United States
Environmental Protection
Agency
Office of Emergency and
Remedial Response
Washington, DC 20460
EPA/54O/8-S1/O14 *
Publication 9200.7-02D
November 1994
Superfund
                       CATALOG   OF
          SUPERFUND    PROGRAM
      INFORMATION   PRODUCTS

-------
                       Invites    You
TO VIEW THE NEW SUPERFUND  EARLY  BIRD
ANNOUNCEMENT WINDOW  ON FEDWORLD(
The National Technical Information Service (NTIS) has joined forces with EPA to ensure that
citizen requests for Superfund information are filled rapidly and at the lowest possible cost.
NTIS is the repository of technical publications for the federal government, the largest single source
for public access to federally produced information, and is equipped to reproduce and distribute
publications on a document-by-document or on a standing order basis. All publicly available
Superfund documents from the Office of Emergency and Remedial Response (OERR) can now
be obtained through NTIS.

The Superfund Early Bird Announcement Window allows you to view a listing of Superfund
documents as soon as they are available. It provides abstracts as well as pricing and
ordering information for each item. In order to keep you current, the Window is updated monthly.
The documents are organized so you can quickly and easily access the information you need most:

•  Introduction (general information)
•  New Documents (listed alphabetically)
•  Current Documents (listed alphabetically)
•  Information On How To Obtain A Listing And
•  Ordering Information For The National Priorities List Sites (by state)

Complete List Of RODs (Records Of Decision - listed by state and then alphabetically by site name)

To connect to FedWorld®: set modem parity to NONE, Data Bits to 8, and Stop Bit to 1 (M-8-1 );
set terminal emulation to ANSI. FedWorld accommodates speeds up to 9600 baud.
To connect to FedWorld through the Internet, telnet to: fedworld.gov. Once you have reached
the main menu, choose "Q" for Quick Bulletins and then type "J" for the Superfund Early Bird
Announcement Window.

-------
                                                       EPA/540/8-91/014
                                                   Publication 9200.7-02D
                                                         November 1994
    SUPERFUND   PROGRAM

INFORIVIATION   PRODUCTS
                          1994
              Office of Emergency and Remedial Response
                 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
                      Washington, DC 20460

-------
       NTIS   &  EPA
The National Technical Information Service (NTIS),
 in cooperation with the Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA), distributes the fact sheets, directives,
 and technical publications needed to respond to
 Superfund legislation and makes them available
  automatically, as they are issued, weeks before
          they are formally announced.

  Superfund material is available in the following
        seven standing order subscriptions:
      • Program Policies and Administration
 •  Environmental Response and Health and Safety
      • Removals and Emergency Response
       • Site Assessment and Remediation
      • Technology and Analytical Services
                •  Enforcement
             •  Records of Decision

   An NTIS Deposit Account is easy to acquire.
        Call (703) 487-4650 for details.

-------
 Title Page	i

 About NTIS and EPA	,	v

 NTIS Products	vi

 How to Order	vjj

 Sample Entry	Viil

 Administrative and Management
    CERCLIS	,	1
    Contracting and Contracts Integrity	3
    Docket and Program Management	15
    Planning and Program Management	,	15
    Special Reports	;	23

 Program Implementation
    Assessment and Listing	57
    Compliance with Other Laws	69
    Community Relations, State and Local, Tag Grants	77
    Enforcement	86
    Federal Facilities	,	167
    Field Health and Safety	168
    Oil Spill and Spill Management	172
    Public Information and Outreach	174
    QA/QC Laboratory Program	182
    Removal Program Management	186
    Risk Management	189
    RI/FS and RODS Process	202
    RD/RA	209
    RQ's and Continuous Release	213
    Treatability Studies	215
    103 (c)	219

Technology Policy and Administration
    Conference Proceedings	222
    Electronic Tools	222
    Miscellaneous Policy and Program Documents	222
                                         III

-------
Technology Program Implementation
    Air Technologies	263
    Bioremediation Technologies	274
    Groundwater Technologies	276
    Incineration and Thermal Technologies	286
    Soil Cleanup Technologies	289
    Solidification Technologies	302
    Surface Water and Sludge Treatment Technologies	308

Indexes
    Subject Index	SU-1
    Number Index	NU-1

Price Schedules	PC

Order forms	OF
                                                  IV

-------
  ABOUT NTIS AND EPA
National Technical Information Service

The National Technical Information Service (NTIS) is a self-
supporting agency within the U.S. Department of Commerce
where scientific, technical, engineering and business-related
information generated by the U.S. government and foreign
sources is collected and made available for purchase by the
general public. As such, NTIS is a partner to the Environ-
mental Protection Agency for the distribution of its reports .
which are publicly releasable.
The NTIS collection, which contains  more than 2.2 million
reports and grows by nearly 1,500 titles each week, includes
information on current technologies, business and manage-
ment studies, and international market research. Additional
findings are available in the fields of energy, health and so-
cial sciences.
As a key participant in the development of advanced infor-
mation products  and  services, NTIS  is able to provide its
reports in various formats  in addition to  paper copy and mi-
crofiche. Much of the collection can be supplied in electronic
formats including datafiles on tape, datafiles on diskette, soft-
ware programs on tape, software programs on diskette, titles
on CD-ROM, audiovisuals, slide sets  and  multimedia kits.
Although a federal agency within the Technology Adminis-
tration of the U.S. Department of Commerce, NTIS is unique
in that it does not receive tax-payer support from Congress.
Instead, operating costs must be recovered from the sale of
its products and services.
The EPA-NTIS Partnership

Superfund is the federal program that protects people and
the environment by cleaning up abandoned or uncontrolled
hazardous waste sites. It was established by Congress in
1980 in response to the growing concern over health and
environmental risks posed by these sites. Administered
nationwide by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
(EPA) and its 10 regional offices, it works in cooperation
with individual states and tribal governments. Cleanup ac-
tivities are funded either by the parties responsible for con-
tamination, or by the Superfund Trust Fund, derived from a
tax on the chemical and petroleum industries.
Since the program's inception, EPA has studied thousands
of hazardous waste sites and gained extensive experience
in technologies  associated with successful removal or re-
mediation. This experience is documented in scores of pro-
gram guidances and technical manuals, fact sheets, soft-
ware and explanatory documents. Production of these prod-
ucts has made the Office of Emergency and Remedial Re-
sponse (OERR), Superfund's home office in EPA, a larger
publishing enterprise than many private sector publishers.
Disseminating this information to program participants who
include  states, local and tribal governments, private con-
tracting firms, potentially responsible parties, law firms, and
citizens groups is a daunting task.
In 1991, The National Technical Information Service (NTIS)
joined in a partnership with EPA under which it serves as
the public clearinghouse for access to this collection, en-
suring that requests for these products are filled rapidly and
at the lowest possible cost. NTIS is the repository of techni-
cal publications for the federal government, and is the larg-
est single source for public access to federally produced
information. It is equipped to reproduce and distribute pub-
lications on demand, or on a standing order basis.
The partnership streamlines public access to  Superfund
publications, and ensures timely, cost-effective  production
of top-quality products.  In keeping with the new emphasis
on streamlining  government, the partnership has enabled
EPA to fully dedicate its resources to  Superfund's mission
of hazardous site cleanup.

-------
 NTIS PRODUCTS
           NTIS ALERT
NTIS Alerts are available in two subscription formats:  prepackaged and
customized.
Prepackaged subscriptions cover the latest developments and information
resources in board subject areas.  NTIS prepares prepackaged subscriptions in
the subjects listed below. All are published twice a month.  For a price list and
sample copies, please write to Subscriptions, NTIS, Springfield, VA 22161 or
call 703-487-4630.
                                       • Agriculture & Food
                                       • Astronomy & Astrophysics
                                       • Biomedical Technology & Human
                                         Factors Engineering
                                       • Building Industry Technology
                                       • Business & Economics
                                       • Civil Engineering
                                       • Combustion, Engines & Propellants
                                       • Communication
                                       • Computers,  Control & Information
                                         Theory
                                       • Detection & Countermeasures
                                       • Electrotechnology
                                       • Energy
                                       • Environmental Pollution & Control
                                      •  Government  Inventions for
                                        Licensing
                                      • Health Care
                                      • Library & Information Sciences
                                      • Manufacturing Technology
                                      > Materials Sciences
                                      • Mathematical Sciences
                                      • Navigation, Guidance & Control
                                      • Ocean Technology & Engineering
                                      • Ordnance
                                      • Photography & Recording Devices
                                      •  Regional & Urban Planning &
                                        Technology
                                      • Space Technology
                                      • Transportation
                                       Customized Alerts are also offered that focus on specific topics. You can choose
                                       from nearly 200 different topics, ideal for staying current in a highly specialized
                                       area of interest. Or, combine several topics to tailor a subscription to your exact
                                       need for information.  Twice a month, your customized set of topical search
                                       criteria will be run against the newest NTIS studies and research reports. Sum-
                                       maries of pertinent material will be assembled into one custom Alert, prepared
                                       just for you. For complete information on  Custom NTIS Alerts please write to
                                       Subscriptions, NTIS, Springfield, VA22161 or call 703-487-4630 and request
                                       PR-797.
             SELECTED
         RESEARCH IN
MICROFICHE (SRIM)
SRIM is a tailored information service that automatically delivers microfiche cop-
ies of complete reports. You design your own subscription parameters, choos-
ing from more than 350 topics.  You than receive all the actual documents in
microfiche at the same time they are being announced in other NTIS information
products. Subject indexes are also available for SRIM. These cumulative in-
dexes are unique to each customer and give ready reference to all of the micro-
fiche received within a calendar year. For complete information on  NTIS SRIM,
please write to Subscriptions, NTIS, Springfield, VA 22161 or call 703-487-4630
and request PR-271.
        A VARIETY OF
PRODUCT FORMATS
The NTIS collection is not limited to printed reports and documents.
Many printed reports and documents are also available on microfiche. NTIS
provides datafiles and software program products! in electronic formats on tape
and floppy diskette, as well as some titles on CD-ROM.
                                                       VI

-------
                           How to  Order
How to order a document from NTIS:

1«  Locate the NTIS order number and Price code for
    a document

    0001 CERCLISCharacterization Project: National Results
    Order numba£gJ92-963331 QDJEDPrice PC A06/MF
    Environmental Protection ^jenc&Washington, D.C. Office 6?
    gency and Remedial Response;
    The report, which is one in a series providingTnfotmation on the
    nature of the sites being evaluated by the SuperfuncfStte^ssessment
    program, characterizes a sample of national  sites in CERCtT
    Separate reports are available for the ten EPA regions.
    Specification: Paper copy available  on Standing Order, deposit
    account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada, and Mexico;
    all others $400). Single copies also available in paper copy or
    microfiche. 108p.
    Subject index keyword: Hazardous materials, Sites, Assessments,
    United States, Superfund, Comprehensive Environmental Response
    Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA), CERCLA Information
    Systems (CERCLIS).
  ice code*
• NTIS order number
2.  Either complete the order form in the back of the
    directory or call NTIS at (703) 487-4650
                               *AII documents are listed with a price code. Schedules to convert the
                               codes into dollar amounts are provided at the back of the catalog.
                                             VII

-------
            Sample  Entry
          Title-
Reference number

NTIS order number




      Summary -



     Price code* •




      Keywords -
§OOj>CERCLIS Characterization Project: National Results
  rder number PB92-963331CDH, Price PO^AOg^MF A02
Environmental Protection Agency.Wasrflngton, D.C. Office of Emer-
gency and Remedial Respon^&rWov 91
The report, which ispperlffa series providing information on the nature
.of the sites bejng-evaluated by the Superfund site assessment pro-
gram.^gbar^cterizes a sample of national sites in CERCLIS. Separate
          available for the ten EPA regions.
Specification: Paper copy available on Standing Order, deposit
account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada, and Mexico;
all others $400). Single copies also available in paper copy or micro-
fiche. 108p.
•Subject index keyword: Hazardous materials, Sites, Assessments,
United States, Superfund, Comprehensive Environmental Response
Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA), CERCLA Information
Systems (CERCLIS).
                 *AII documents are listed with a price code. Schedules to convert the
                 price codes into dollar amounts are provided at the back of the catalog.
                            VIII

-------
ADMINISTRATIVE  &  MANAGEMENT:

CERCLIS

0001  CERCLIS Characterization Project: National Results
  Order Number PB92-963315CDH, price: PC A06/MF A02
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Emergency and Remedial Response; Nov 91
  The report, which is one in a series providing information on
  the nature of the sites being evaluated by the Superfund site
  assessment  program, characterizes a  sample of national
  sites in CERCLIS. Separate reports are available for the ten
  EPA Regions.
  Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
  posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
  and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available  in
  paper copy or microfiche. 108p.
  Subject index keywords:  Hazardous  materials, Sites, As-
  sessments, United States, Superfund, Comprehensive Envi-
  ronmental   Response    Compensation    and    Liability
  Act(CERCLA), CERCLA Information System(CERCLIS).
0002  CERCLIS Characterization Project: Region 1 Results
  Order Number PB92-963316CDH, price: PC A05/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Emergency and Remedial Response; Nov 91
  The publication is one in a series of reports providing infor-
  mation on the nature of the sites being evaluated by the Su-
  perfund  site  assessment  program and  characterizes  a
  sample of Regional sites in CERCLIS. National  and Regional
  NPL (National Priority List) characterization reports cover the
  NPL  characterization project, which provides a snapshot  of
  sites on the NPL as of February 1991.
  Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
  posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
  and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available  in
  paper copy or microfiche. 76p.
  Subject index keywords:  Hazardous  materials, Sites, As-
  sessments,  Superfund,   CERCLA(Comprehensive  Environ-
  mental   Response  Compensation  and   Liability  Act),
  CERCLIS(CERCLA Information System).
0003  CERCLIS Characterization Project: Region 2 Results
  Order Number PB92-963317CDH, price: PC A05/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Emergency and Remedial Response; Nov 91
  The publication is one in a series of reports providing infor-
  mation on the nature of the sites being evaluated by the Su-
  perfund  site  assessment  program and  characterizes  a
  sample of Regional sites in  CERCLIS. National  and Regional
  NPL  (National Priorities  List) characterization reports cover
  the NPL characterization  project, which provides a snapshot
  of sites on the NPL as of February 1991.
  Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
  posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
  and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available  in
  paper copy or microfiche. 76p.
  Subject index keywords:  Hazardous  materials, Sites, As-
  sessments,  Superfund,   CERCLA(Comprehensive  Environ-
  mental   Response  Compensation  and   Liability  Act),
  CERCLIS(CERCLA Information System).
0004  CERCLIS Characterization Project: Region 3 Results
  Order Number PB92-963318CDH, price: PC A05/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Emergency and Remedial Response; Nov 91
  The report, which is one in a series providing information on
  the nature of the sites being evaluated by the Superfund site
  assessment program, characterizes a sample of Region  3
  sites in  CERCLIS.  Separate  reports  are available  for the
  other nine EPA Regions and for the nation as a whole.
  Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
  posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
  and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available  in
  paper copy or microfiche. 88p.
  Subject! index keywords: Hazardous  materials, Sites, As-
  sessments, Superfund, Comprehensive Environmental  Re-
  sponse Compensation  and Liability Act(CERCLA), CERCLA
  Information System(CERCLIS).

0005  CERCLIS Characterization Project: Region 4 Results
  Order Number PB92-963319CDH, price: PC A05/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Emergency and Remedial Response; Nov 91
  The report, which is one in a series providing information on
  the nature of the sites being evaluated by the Superfund site
  assessment program, characterizes a sample of Region  4
  sites in  CERCLIS.  Separate  reports  are available  for the
  other nine EPA regions and for the nation as a whole.
  Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
  posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
  and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available  in
  paper copy or microfiche. 80p.
  Subject index keywords: Hazardous  materials, Sites, As-
  sessments, Superfund,  Comprehensive Environmental  Re-
  sponse Compensation  and Liability Act(CERCLA), CERCLA
  Information System(CERCLIS).
0006  CERCLIS Characterization Project: Region 5 Results
  Order Number PB92-963320CDH, price: PC A05/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Emergency and Remedial Response; Nov 91
  The report, which is one in a series providing information on
  the nature of the sites being evaluated by the Superfund site
  assessment program, characterizes a sample of Region  5
  sites in  CERCLIS.  Separate  reports  are available  for the
  other nine EPA Regions and for the nation as a whole.
  Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
  posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
  and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available  in
  paper copy or microfiche. 80p.
  Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Sites, As-
  sessments, Superfund, US  EPA Region 5, Comprehensive
  Environmental   Response   Compensation   and   Liability
  Act(CERCLA), CERCLA Information System(CERCLIS).
0007  CERCLIS Characterization Project: Region 6 Results
  Order Number PB92-963321CDH, price: PC A05/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Emergency and Remedial Response; Nov 91
  The report, which is one in a series providing  information on
  the nature of the sites being evaluated by the Superfund site
  assessment program, characterizes a  sample of Region  6

-------
ADMINISTRATIVE & MANAGEMENT: CERCLIS
  sites In CERCLIS.  Separate reports are available for the
  other nine EPA Regions and for the nation as a whole.
  Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
  posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
  and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
  paper copy  or microfiche. 80p.
  Subject Index keywords: Hazardous materials, Sites, As-
  sessments,  Superfund, US EPA Region 6,  Comprehensive
  Environmental   Response  Compensation   and   Liability
  Act(CERCLA), CERCLA Information System(CERCLIS).

0008  CERCLIS Characterization Project: Region 7 Results
  Order Number PB92-963322CDH, price: PC A05/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Emergency  and Remedial Response; Nov 91
  The report,  which is one in a series providing information on
  the nature of the sites being evaluated by the Superfund site
  assessment program, characterizes a sample of Region 7
  sites in CERCLIS.  Separate reports are available for the
  other nine EPA Regions and for the nation as a whole.
  Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
  posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
  and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
  paper copy  or microfiche. 80p.
  Subject Index keywords: Hazardous materials, Sites, As-
  sessments,  Superfund, US EPA Region 7,  Comprehensive
  Environmental   Response  Compensation   and   Liability
  Act(CERCLA), CERCLA Information System(CERCLIS).

0009  CERCLIS Characterization Project: Region 8 Results
  Order Number PB92-963323CDH, price: PC A05/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Emergency  and Remedial Response; Nov 91
  The report,  which is one in a series providing information on
  the nature of the sites being evaluated by the Superfund site
  assessment program, characterizes a sample of Region 8
  sites in CERCLIS.  Separate reports are available for the
  other nine EPA Regions and for the nation as a whole.
  Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
  posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
  and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
  paper copy  or microfiche. 80p.
  Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Sites, As-
  sessments,  Superfund, Comprehensive Environmental Re-
  sponse Compensation  and Liability Act(CERCLA),  CERCLA
  Information  System(CERCLIS).

0010  CERCLIS Characterization Project: Region 9 Results
  Order Number PB92-963324CDH, price: PC A05/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Emergency  and Remedial Response; Nov 91
  The report,  which is one in a series providing information on
  the nature of the sites being evaluated by the Superfund site
  assessment program, characterizes a sample of Region 9
  sites in CERCLIS.  Separator reports are available for the
  other nine EPA Regions and for the nation as a whole.
  Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
  posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
  and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
  paper copy  or microfiche. 80p.
  Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Sites, As-
  sessments,  Superfund, Comprehensive Environmental Re-
  sponse Compensation  and Liability Act(CERCLA), CERCLA
  Information System(CERCLIS).

0011  CERCLIS Characterization Project: Region 10
  Results
  Order Number PB92-963325CDH, price: PC A05/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Emergency and Remedial Response; Nov 91
  The report is one in a series  providing  information on the
  nature of the sites being evaluated by the Superfund site as-
  sessment program and characterizing a  sample of  sites in
  CERCLIS. Separate reports are available for the other  nine
  EPA Regions and for the nation as a whole.
  Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
  posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
  and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
  paper copy or microfiche. 80p.
  Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Sites, As-
  sessments,  Superfund, Comprehensive  Environmental  Re-
  sponse Compensation  and Liability Act(CERCLA), CERCLA
  Information System(CERCLIS).

0012  CERCLIS (Comprehensive Environmental Response,
  Compensation, and Liability Information System) Site
  Location Extract
  Order Number PB90-591310CDH, price: Subscription, call for
  price
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Emergency and Remedial Response; 1990
  The file contains data  on  potentially  hazardous waste sites
  that have  been reported  to the  Environmental Protection
  Agency by States, Municipalities, Private  companies  and pri-
  vate persons, pursuant  to Section 103 of  the Comprehensive
  Environmental Response,  Compensation and  Liability Act
  (CERCLA) of 1980, as amended. The file contains informa-
  tion on the  name and  alias names, location, and indicators
  for National Priority status and Federal Facility.
  Specifications: Source tape is  in the  EBCDIC character set.
  This restricts preparation to 9 track, one-half inch tape only.
  Identify recording mode by specifying  density only. For price
  at 6250 bpi density, call NTIS  Computer Products. Price in-
  clude  documentation, PB90-215120. Available  on subscrip-
  tion, NAG  price $880/yr;  individual issue $220; all others
  write for quote. Issued quarterly. Supersedes PB88-914800.
  See also PB90-591300.
  Subject index keywords: Data file, Hazardous  materials,
  Waste disposal, Sites.

0013  CERCLIS Data Handling Support Policy Statement
  Order Number PB90-258328CDH, price: PC A01/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Emergency and Remedial Response; 30 May 90
  The directive updates the policy  statement published on
  March 31, 1986, regarding management of the data handling
  support contract for CERCLIS. The update contains no major
  changes in policy,  but rather presents the information in ac-
  cordance with the current document management standards.
  Specifications:  5p.
  Subject index keywords!:  Regulations, Project management,
  Documentation, Contract administration, Superfund, Office of
  Solid Waste and Emergency Response.

-------
                                                            ADMINISTRATIVE & MANAGEMENT: Contracting &
                                                                                             Contracts Integrity
0014  CERCLIS Listing
  Order Number PB91-921348CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Emergency and Remedial Response; 5 Feb 90
  The directive discusses ways to assure rapid entry into the
  Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and
  Liability Information System (CERCLIS) of locations identified
  to or by the Agency as potential hazardous waste release
  sites. The directive re-emphasizes the use of the Preliminary
  Assessment Petition and provides a copy of the public edu-
  cational bulletin, 'Preliminary Assessment Petition.'
  Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
  posit account required (minimum deposit $150 U.S., Canada,
  and Mexico; all others $300). Single copies also available in
  paper copy or microfiche. 7p.
  Subject index keywords: Superfund,  Waste management,
  Hazardous materials, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
  Response, Preliminary Assessment Petition.

0015  CERCLIS - WasteLAN - CleanLAN
  Order Number PB91-921316CDH, price: PC A01/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Emergency and Remedial Response; Apr 91
  CERCLIS, WasteLAN and CleanLAN  information manage-
  ment systems are an integral component of the Superfund
  program  site  planning  and  management structure  and
  progress reporting. These three integrated  systems provide
  information for Superfund regional program and project man-
  agement as well as reporting activities to EPA management,
  Congress, USAGE and the public.
  Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
  posit account required (minimum deposit $150 U.S., Canada,
  and Mexico; all others $300). Single copies also available in
  paper copy or microfiche. 3p.
  Subject index keywords: Program management,  Informa-
  tion systems, Hazardous materials, Superfund, Comprehen-
  sive Environmental Response Compensation and Liability Act
  of 1980.


ADMINISTRATIVE &  MANAGEMENT:

Contracting  & Contracts Integrity

0016  Abstracts of Phase 1 and Phase 2 Awards: Small
  Business Innovation Research Program 1991
  Order Number PB94-146495CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Research and Development; Feb 92
  Contents: 1991 Phase I abstracts (Drinking  water treatment;
  Municipal and industrial waste water treatment and pollution
  control; Biological sludge treatment for improved  handling
  and disposal;  Solid and hazardous waste  disposal; In situ
  treatment technologies for hazardous and toxic waste  at Su-
  perfund sites; Innovative  restoration technologies removing
  heavy metals at Superfund sites; Control of  acid rain precur-
  sors; Air pollution control; Waste reduction and pollution pre-
  vention;  and, Oil spill prevention cleanup, and  restoration
  technology)  and 1991 Phase II abstracts (Municipal and in-
  dustrial waste water treatment and pollution  control;  Solid
  and hazardous waste disposal; Control of acid rain precur-
  sors; Air pollution control; Waste reduction and pollution pre-
  vention;  and, Oil  spill prevention, cleanup, and  restoration
  technology).
  Specifications:  31 p.
  Subject index  keywords: Superfund,  Research' projects,
  SBIR(Small Business Innovative Research).

0017  Administrative Guidance for the FIT to ARCS (FIT/
  ARCS) Transition
  Order Number PB92-963332CDH, price: PC A06/MF A02
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Emergency and Remedial Response; 29 Nov 91
  The report describes the final  administrative  guidance for
  managing pre-remedial, site assessment work under the Al-
  ternative Remedial Contracting Strategy (ARCS) contracts.
  Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
  posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
  and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
  paper copy or microfiche.  113p.
  Subject index  keywords: Hazardous  materials, Pollution
  control, Project management, Superfund.

0018  Approval of Long Term Contracting Strategy for
  Superfund (Superfund Management  Review:
  Recommendation E.2)
  Order Number PB90-273822CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Emergency and Remedial Response; 31 Aug 90
  The directive summarizes the issues,  findings, analysis and
  recommendations for the Superfund Long-Term Contracting
  Strategy which was developed to analyze the long-term con-
  tract needs of the Superfund Program and to design a port-
  folio of Superfund contracts to meet  those needs over the
  next ten years.
  Specifications:  42p.
  Subject index  keywords: Hazardous  materials,  Project
  management,  Contracts,  Superfund,  Management  reviews,
  Waste management, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
  Response.

0019  ARCS (Alternative Remedial Contract Strategy)
  Contracts Users' Manual
  Order Number PB90-108549CDH, price: PC A05/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Emergency and Remedial Response; Aug 89
  The handbook provides guidance for  EPA Regional person-
  nel with responsibility for  management and  administration of
  Alternative Remedial  Contract Strategy  (ARCS) contracts.
  The ARCS is EPA's approach to obtaining  project manage-
  ment and  technical services to support  remedial response
  activities at National Priorities List sites. Guidance is provided
  on contractor start-up, operational functions and a manage-
  ment plan for multi-regional ARCS contracts.
  Specifications:  90p.
  Subject! index keywords:  Regional planning,  Contract ad-
  ministration, Hazardous materials, Waste disposal, Alterna-
  tive Remedial Contract Strategy, Remedial response, Super-
  fund program.
0020  AFICS Construction Contract Modification
  Procedures
  Order Number PB90-274515CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 89
  The fact sheet describes  the contracting  relationships,  tech-
  nical reviews, and  administrative  procedures  required to

-------
ADMINISTRATIVE & MANAGEMENT: Contracting &
Contracts Integrity
  process supplemental  agreements and  change orders  for
  changed  work  in  Remedial Action construction projects
  which are subcontracts under EPA's ARCS contracts.
  Specifications: 9p.
  Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Construction
  management, Superfund, Waste management, Office of Solid
  Waste and Emergency Response, Remedial action.

0021  ARCS Work Assignment Management: Field Guide
  Order Number PB91-214965CDH, price: PC A07/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Emergency and Remedial Response; Jan  89
  The ARCS Work  Assignment management Field Guide is
  one of the  three  management-assistance  tools currently
  available to help RPMs  in carrying out their  ARCS work  as-
  signment management duties. The guide  is designed specifi-
  cally for RPMs to provide them with quick reference informa-
  tion on the initiation and management of ARCS work assign-
  ments.
  Specifications: 131 p.
  Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
  Hazardous materials, Office of Solid Waste  and Emergency
  Response, Alternative Remedial  Contract Strategy.

0022  Congressional Limits for FY 92 Alternative Remedial
  Contracting Strategy (ARCS) Program Management
  Costs
  Order Number PB92-963260CDH, price: PC A01/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Emergency and Remedial Response; 16 Mar  92
  The directive transmits Congressionally  mandated  targets
  and reporting  requirements for ARCS  contracts  Program
  Management costs.
  Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
  posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
  and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
  paper copy or microfiche. 2p.
  Subject index keywords: Superfund,  Waste management,
  Hazardous materials, Office of Solid Waste  and Emergency
  Response.

0023  Contracting and Subcontracting Guide to the
  Superfund Program
  Order  Number PB92-963274CDH, price: PC Free
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Emergency and Remedial Response; May 92
  The document assists those interested in providing contrac-
  tual services  to the Superfund  program,  describes  current
  Superfund contracts and provides contact points, addresses,
  and telephone numbers of  firms with Superfund contracts.
  Specifications:  Supersedes PB89-233431. 74p.
  Subject index keywords:  Hazardous materials, Contract ad-
  ministration, Subcontracts,  Pollution control, Superfund.
0024  Emergency Response Cleanup Services Contracts
  (ERGS). Users Manual
  Order Number PB90-191966CDH, price: PC A10/MF A02
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Emergency and Remedial Response; Oct 87
  The report provides information  to assist  EPA Headquarters
  and Regional personnel, and  personnel from other Federal
  agencies  (e.g., U.S. Coast Guard)  authorized  to  use the
  ERGS contracts efficiently and  effectively. In addition, the
  users'  manual discusses coordinating the use of the ERGS
  contracts with other entities involved with the Superfund pro-
  gram.
  Specifications:  21 Op.
  Subject index keywords: Emergencies, Hazardous materi-
  als, Contract administration, Cleanup.

0025  Guidance for Organizing ARCS Contract Files
  Order Number PB91-215020CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 3 Jan 89
  The directive provides instructions to the Regions for devel-
  opment of a consistent, yet flexible filing system for organiz-
  ing and managing ARCS Contract files.
  Specifications:  10p.
  Subject index keywords: Superfund,  Waste management,
  Hazardous materials, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
  Response.   ;

0026  Guidance on Program Management Activities under
  ARCS
  Order Number PB93-963280CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 11 Feb 93
  The directive provides guidance on the division of program
  management costs into  administrative support  costs and
  technical cleanup costs and the development of guidance on
  cost management activities.
  Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
  posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
  and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies  also available in
  paper copy or microfiche. 24p.
  Subject index keywords: Superfund,  Waste management,
  Hazardous materials, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
  Response.

0027  Guidelines for Effective Management of the
  Contract Laboratory Program
  Order Number PB90-272568CDH, price: PC A01/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Emergency and Remedial Response; Nov 89
  The fact sheet provides guidance to Superfund Headquarters
  Project Officers (POs) arid Regional deputy Project Officers
  (DPOs). The PO and DPO roles, responsibilities, limitations,
  and interrelationships with other supporting parties are de-
  fined for every stage of the Superfund process.
  Specifications: See also PB90-191545. 4p.
  Subject index keywords: Project management, Superfund,
  Office of Solid Waste and  Emergency Response, Contract
  Laboratory Program.

0028  Guidelines for Effective Management of the
  Contract Laboratory Program. Part 1. Contract Award.
  Part 2. Contract Administration
  Order Number PB90-191545CDH, price: PC A15/MF A02
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Emergency and Remedial Response; Nov 89
  Provides internal guidelines for Superfund Project Officers in
  procuring, administering, managing CLP contracts.
  Specifications: 346p.
  Subject index keywords;: Laboratories, Superfund program,
  Contract Laboratory Program.

-------
                                                             ADMINISTRATIVE & MANAGEMENT: Contracting &
                                                                                              Contracts Integrity
0029  Headquarters Support Contract Management
  Procedures
  Order Number PB91-921335CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Emergency and Remedial Response; 15 Nov 89
  The directive addresses two areas: (1) perceptions that may
  weaken public confidence in the Superfund program and  its
  use of  these contracts; and  (2)  procedures  designed  to
  strengthen controls and effectiveness in the management of
  the contracts. It is  not all inclusive but provides information
  to be applied to OERR work assignments.
  Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
  posit account required (minimum deposit $150 U.S., Canada,
  and Mexico; ail others $300). Single copies also available in
  paper copy or microfiche. 23p.
  Subject index keywords:  Superfund, Waste management,
  Hazardous materials, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
  Response.

0030  Implementation of the Alternative Remedial
  Contracting Strategy (ARCS) Task Force
  Recommendations: Transmittal of the Implementation
  Plan
  Order Number PB92-963258CDH, price: PC A01/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Emergency and Remedial Response; 22 Jan 92   .
  The memorandum transmits the Implementation Plan for the
  recommendations  embodied in the Alternative Remedial
  Contracting Strategy (ARCS) Task Force Report.
  Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
  posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
  and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
  paper copy or microfiche. 5p.
  Subject index keywords:  Hazardous materials,  Pollution
  control, Contract administration,  Superfund.
0031  Implementation of the Decentralized Contractor
  Performance Evaluation and Award Fee Process for
  Selected Remedial Program Contracts
.  Order Number PB91-205492CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 9 Mar 87
  The directive is intended to: (1) further develop Regional in-
  frastructures for managing contracts in  advance of imple-
  mentation  of the  Alternative Remedial Contracts Strategy
  (ARCS); (2) effect the Agency's policy of  decentralizing Su-
  perfund  activities  to the Regions, consistent with other pro-
  gram delegations; (3) focus accountability  for  contractor per-
  formance monitoring on the individuals who are responsible
  for site specific Program operations; (4) allow those most fa-
  miliar  with  a contractor's performance and  determine the
  amount of fee to be awarded; and  (5) increase communica-
  tion between Agency and contractor personnel at all  oper-
  ational and management levels. The Standard Operating Pro-
  cedure (SOP) defines  the roles and responsibilities of key
  Regional, Headquarters, and Contractor personnel and de-
  fines  the basic structure and  operation  of the award fee
  process, as well  as establishes minimum requirements for
  contractor performance evaluations  and award fee decisions.
  Specifications: 14p.
  Subject index  keywords:  Superfund, Waste management,
  Hazardous materials, Remedial action, Office of Solid Waste
  and Emergency Response.
0032  Implementation of the Superfund Alternative
  Remedial Contracting Strategy (ARCS): Report of the
  Administrator's Task Force. Implementation Plan
  Order Number PB92-963201CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Emergency and Remedial Response; 27 Nov 91
  The report includes  results of a Task Force  analysis of the
  criticism the EPA received about the management of the Su-
  perfund  contracting program. EPA was accused of  allowing
  Superfund contractors to spend  an inordinate amount  of
  public funds on activities  other than the direct  clean-up of
  contaminated sites.  The document provides  a summary of
  recommendations, strategies and proposed  milestones to im-
  plement.
  Specifications: Paper copy available  on Standing Order, de-
  posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S.,  Canada,
  and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
  paper copy or microfiche. 32p.
  Subject  index  keywords:  Hazardous materials,  Project
  management, Pollution control, Superfund.

0033  Initiatives to Streamline the Alternative Remedial
  Contracting Strategy (ARCS) Contracts' Award Fee
  Process
  Order Number PB93-963275CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 4 Sep 92
  The directive delineates changes to the Alternative Remedial
  Contracting Strategy (ARCS) award fee process which will
  streamline the system for evaluating contractors'  perform-
  ance.
  Specifications: Paper copy available  on Standing Order, de-
  posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S.,  Canada,
  and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
  paper copy or microfiche. 32p.
  Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
  Hazardous materials, Office  of Solid Waste and Emergency
  Response, Alternative Remedial  Contracting Strategy.
0034  Inorganic Contract Compliance Screening System
  (ICCSS) Software (for Microcomputers)
  Order Number PB90-591700CDH, price: Standing Order, call
  for price
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Emergency and Remedial Response; 12 Feb 90
  Inorganic Contract Compliance  Screening  System  (ICCSS)
  software is a version of a mainframe-based  application de-
  veloped  for the U.S.  Environmental Protection Agency's Na-
  tional Contract Laboratory Program (CLP). ICCSS is designed
  to  automate the determination  of contractural  compliance
  and completeness of data submitted to the EPA under the
  Routine  Analytical Services  (RAS)  programs  of  CERCLA
  (Comprehensive Emergency  Response Clean-up and Liability
  Act) and SARA (Superfund  Amendments and Reauthoriza-
  tion Act). In order to remain consistent with  the mainframe
  system,  the PC version of ICCSS is written in SAS and re-
  quires that SAS/PC  be installed on the host  PC. It will load
  analytical data from  diskettes into SAS file format,  perform
  technical edits on data, produce technical  defect and sum-
  mary reports, and reproduce forms which contain defects. In
  addition,  ICCSS includes  software to  assist in identifying
  these critical structural defects in the data format, to  assist in
  identifying these for  correction prior to performing technical

-------
ADMINISTRATIVE & MANAGEMENT: Contracting &
Contracts integrity
  edits. The 3/90 version of ICCSS software is applicable to
  structural and technical checking of diskette data in either
  format A or B for inorganic analysis under the CLP RAS 2/88
  Statement of Work  (SOW)...Software Description: The pro-
  gram is  written in the SAS programming language for imple-
  mentation on an  IBM/AT.PS/2 or compatible microcomputer
  using MS DOS 3.3 operating system.
  Specifications: The software is contained on 5 1/4-inch dis-
  kettes,  high density  (1.2M), compatible  with the IBM  PC
  microcomputer. The diskettes are in the ASCII format. Price
  includes documentation, PB90-213836. Available on Stand-
  ing Order, Deposit Account  required. North American Conti-
  nent price $200.00; all others write for quote. 1  diskette.
  Subject index keywords: Software, Contract administration,
  Monitoring,  Comprehensive  Emergency Response Clean-up
  and Liability Act(CERCLA), Superfund Amendments and Re-
  authorization Act(SARA).

0035  Inorganic Contract Compliance Screening System
  (ICCSS) Software for the PC (Version 3/90) User Manual
  Order Number PB90-213836CDH, price: PC A07/MF A01
  Viar and Co., Alexandria, VA. Management Services Div.;
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington,  DC. Office of
  Emergency and Remedial Response; Feb 90
  The  document is the user  manual  for Inorganic Contract
  Compliance  Screening  System  (ICCSS) software.  ICCSS
  software is a version of a mainframe-based application  de-
  veloped for the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's Na-
  tional Contract Laboratory Program (CLP). ICCSS is designed
  to automate the determination of contractual compliance and
  completeness of  data submitted to EPA under the Routine
  Analytical Services (RAS) programs of CERCLA  (Compre-
  hensive  Emergency Response Clean-up and Liability Act)
  and  SARA  (Superfund Amendments  and  Reauthorization
  Act).  In  order to  remain  consistent  with  the  mainframe
  system the PC version of ICCSS is written  in SAS and re-
  quires that SAS/PC be installed  on the host PC.  It will load
  analytical data from diskettes into SAS file  format, perform
  technical edits on the data, produce technical  defect and
  summary reports, and reproduce forms which shows defects.
  In addition,  ICCSS includes software to detect critical struc-
  tural defects in the data format, to assist in identifying these
  for correction prior to performing technical edits. The 2/90
  version  of  ICCSS software  is applicable to structural and
  technical checking of diskette data in either format A or B for
  inorganic analysis under the CLP RAS 2/88  Statement of
  Work (SOW).
  Specifications:   For system on diskette, see PB90-591700.
  Sponsored by Environmental Protection Agency, Washington,
  DC. Office of Emergency and Remedial Response. 138p.
  Subject index keywords: Contract administration, Monitor-
  ing, Comprehensive  Emergency Response Clean-up and Li-
  ability Act(CERCLA), Superfund Amendments and Reauthor-
  ization Act(SARA).

0036  Inorganic Contract Compliance Screening System
  (ICCSS) Software (ILM02.1 Version 2) (for
  Microcomputers)
  Order Number PB93-500288CDH, price: D02
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC.
  Hazardous Site Evaluation Div; 1992
  ICCSS software is a version of a mainframe-based applica-
  tion developed for the U.S.  Environmental Protection  Agen-
  cy's National Contract Laboratory Program (CLP). OCCSS is
  designed to automate the determination of contractural com-
  pliance  and  completeness of data submitted  to  the  EPA
  under the Routine Analytical Services (RAS)  programs  of
  CERCLA (Comprehensive Environmental Response Compen-
  sation and Liability Act). In order to remain consistent with
  the mainframe system, the PC version  of ICCSS is written in
  SAS, and requires that SAS/PC be installed on  the host PC.
  It will load analytical data from diskettes into SAS file format,
  perform  technical edits on data, produce technical  defect
  and summary reports, arid reproduce forms  which contain
  defects.  In addition, OCCSS  includes  software to assist in
  identifying these critical structural defects in the data format,
  to assist in identifying these for correction prior to performing
  technical edits.
  Specifications: The software is on one 51/4 inch diskette,
  1.2M high density. File format: Executable Code. Documenta-
  tion included; may be ordered separately as  PB92-145598.
  System:  IBM AT/PS2, or compatible;  MS DOS Version 3.3
  operating system. Language:  Base SAS. Supersedes PB92-
  501519.  Other formats available  as PB93-500270 (OCCSS).
  1 diskette.
  Subject  index keywords: Software,  Waste management,
  Analytical chemistry, Environmental surveys, Inorganic com-
  pounds,  Inorganic Contract Compliance Screening System.

0037  Inorganic Contract Compliance Screening System
  (ICCSS)  Software (ILM02.1 Version 3) (for
  Microcomputers)
  Order Number PB93-505352CDH, price: D02
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC.
  Hazardous Site Evaluation Div; Apr 93
  ICCSS software is a version of a mainframe-based applica-
  tion developed for the U.S. Environmental  Protection Agen-
  cy's National Contract Laboratory Program (CLP).  ICCSS is
  designed to automate the determination of contractural com-
  pliance  and  completeness of data submitted  to  the  EPA
  under the Routine Analytical Services (RAS)  programs  of
  CERCLA (Comprehensive Emergency  Response  Clean-up
  and Liability  Act).  In order  to  remain consistent with the
  mainframe system, the PC version of ICCSS  is written  in
  SAS, and requires that SAS/PC be installed on  the host PC.
  It will load analytical data from diskettes into SAS file format,
  perform  technical edits on data, produce technical  defect
  and summary reports, and reproduce  forms  which contain
  defects.  In addition, ICCSS includes  software  to  assist  in
  identifying these critical structural defects in the  data format,
  to assist in identifying these for correction prior to performing
  technical edits.
  Specifications: The software is on one 51/4 inch diskette,
  360K double density. File  Format:  Executable Code. Docu-
  mentation included; may be  ordered  separately  as  PB92-
  145598.   System:  IBM compatible;   MS  DOS  operating
  system.  Language: Base  SAS.  Supersedes  PB93-500288.
  See also PB92-501519 and PB90-591700. 1 diskette.
  Subject  index keywords: Software, Waste management, In-
  organic compounds, Analytical chemistry, Environmental sur-
  veys, Inorganic Contract Compliance Screening System.

-------
                                                             ADMINISTRATIVE & MANAGEMENT: Contracting &
                                                                                              Contracts Integrity
0038  Inorganic Contract Compliance Screening System
  (ICCSS) Software (ILM02.1 Version 4) (for
  Microcomputers)
  Order Number PB94-500642CDH, price: D02
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC.
  Hazardous Site Evaluation  Div; 1994
  ICCSS software is a version of a mainframe-based applica-
  tion developed for the U.S. Environmental Protection Agen-
  cy's National Contract Laboratory Program (CLP).  ICCSS is
  designed to automate the determination of contractural com-
  pliance  and  completeness of data submitted  to  the  EPA
  under the Routine Analytical Services  (RAS)  programs of
  CERCLA (Comprehensive Emergency Response  Clean-up
  and Liability Act). In order  to  remain  consistent  with  the
  mainframe system, the PC version of ICCSS  is written in
  SAS, and requires that SAS/PC be installed on  the host PC.
  It will load analytical data from diskettes into SAS file format,
  perform technical edits on data,  produce technical defect
  and summary reports, and reproduce forms  which contain
  defects. In  addition, ICCSS  includes software  to  assist in
  identifying these critical structural defects in the data format,
  to assist in identifying these for correction  prior to performing
  technical edits.
  Specifications: The software is on one 5 1/4 inch diskette,
  360K  double density. File format:  Executable  code. Docu-
  mentation included;  may  be  ordered separately as PB92-
  145598.  System: IBM compatible; MS DOS  operating
  system, 585K. Language: Base SAS. 2MB. Hard disk with at
  least 10 MB of available space. Printer with wide carriage or
  ability to compress print. Other software  which  are  memory
  resident will use up base memory and should not be on the
  same  machine as ICCSS.  SAS required, hot available NTIS.
  Supersedes PB93-505352.  See al.  1 diskette.
  Subject  index  keywords: Software, Superfund,  Contract
  management.

0039  Inorganic Contract Compliance Screening System
  (ICCSS) Software (ILM02.1 Version 5) (for
  Microcomputers)
  Order Number PB94-501467CDH, price: D02
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Emergency and Remedial Response; 1994
  ICCSS software is a version of a mainframe-based applica-
  tion developed for the U.S. Environmental Protection Agen-
  cy's National Contract Laboratory Program (CLP). ICCSS is
  designed to automate the determination of contractural com-
  pliance  and  completeness of data submitted  to  the  EPA
  under the Routine Analytical Services  (RAS)  programs of
  CERCLA (Comprehensive  Emergency Response  Clean-up
  and Liability Act). In order  to  remain consistent  with  the
  mainframe system, this PC version of ICGSS  is written in
  SAS, and requires that SAS/PC be installed on  the host PC.
  It will load analytical data from diskettes into SAS file format,
  perform technical edits on data,  produce technical defect
  and summary reports, and reproduce forms  which contain
  defects. In  addition,  ICCSS  includes software  to  assist in
  identifying these critical structural defects in the  data format,
  to assist in identifying these for correction prior to performing
  technical edits.
  Specifications: The software  is on one 5 1/4 inch diskette,
  360K  double density. File format:  Executable  code. Docu-
  mentation included; may be  ordered separately as PB92-
  145598. System: IBM  Compatible; DOS  operating  system,
  585K. Language: Base SAS. 2 mb of RAM with memory over
  640K configured as expanded  memory. Hard  disk with  at
  least 10 mb of available space.  Printer with wide carriage or
  ability to compress print. Other  software which are memory
  resident will use up base memory and should not be on the
  same machine as SAS required, not available  NTIS. 1 dis-
  kette.                  ,
  Subject index keywords:  Software, Inorganic compounds,
  Superfund, Contract management.

0040   Inorganic Contract Compliance Screening System
  (ICCSS) Software (SOW March 1990) (Version 1) (for
  Microcomputers)
  Order Number PB92-501519CDH, price: D02,
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Emergency and Remedial Response; Mar 90
  ICCSS software is a version of  a mainframe-based applica-
  tion developed for the U.S. Environmental  Protection Agen-
  cy's  National Contract Laboratory Program (CLP). ICCSS is
  designed to automate the determination of contractural com-
  pliance and  completeness  of data submitted  to the  EPA
  under the  Routine Analytical Services (RAS) programs  of
  CERCLA (Comprehensive Environmental Response Compen-
  sation and Liability Act). In order to remain consistent with
  the mainframe system, this PC version of ICCSS is written in
  SAS, and requires  that SAS/PC  be installed on the host PC.
  It will load  analytical data from diskettes into SAS file format,
  perform technical  edits on data, produce technical  defect
  and  summary reports, and reproduce forms  which contain
  defects. In addition, ICCSS includes software  to assist  in
  identifying  these critical structural defects in the data format,
  to assist in identifying these for correction prior to performing
  technical edits.
,  Specifications: The software is on one (1) 5  1/4 inch dis-
  kette, 1.2M high density File  format: ASCII. Documentation
  included;  may be ordered  separately  as  PB92-145598.
  System: IBM AT/PS2, or compatible; MS DOS Version 3.3
  operating  system.  Language: Base SAS.  Supersedes PB90-
  591700. 1 diskette.
  Subject index keywords: Software,  Analytical  chemistry,
  Environmental  surveys, Inorganic compounds, Waste man-
  agement,  Inorganic Contract Compliance  Screening System.

0041   Inorganic Contract Compliance Screening System
  Software for the PC (SOW March 1990 Version 1). User
  Manual
  Order Number PB92-145598CDH, price: PC A07/MF A02,
  Viar and Co., Alexandria, VA'. Environmental Services Div.;
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Emergency and Remedial Response; Mar 90
  The  Inorganic  Contract  Compliance  Screening  System
  (ICCSS) software is a version of a mainframe-based applica-
  tion developed for the U.S. Environmental  Protection Agen-
  cy's  National Contract Laboratory Program (CLP). ICCSS is
  designed to automate the determination of contractual com-
  pliance and completeness of  data submitted  to EPA under
  the Routine Analytical Services (RAS) programs of CERCLA
  (Comprehensive  Environmental  Response Compensation
  and  Liability Act) and  SARA  (Superfund Amendments and
  Reauthorization Act). The manual provides the user with in-
  structions for running ICCSS  software on the PC. Descrip-
  tions of and  instructions for each menu ^are detailed in the
  following sections. The user should have a working  knowl-

-------
ADMINISTRATIVE & MANAGEMENT: Contracting &
Contracts Integrity
  edge of PC DOS prior to utilizing this system. The following
  sections present the ICCSS operating environment, describe
  system output (reports), provide instructions for running the
  system and generating  reports, and  specify input data  re-
  quirements. Examples of reports are  contained in Appendix
  A. Appendix B contains descriptions of report  defect codes
  and text. Appendix C is  a listing of defect statements by cri-
  terion with associated SOW references. Data Format A from
  the Inorganic RAS SOW (3/90) is included  as Appendix D.
  Since ICCSS PC software is  implemented using Base SAS
  Software, the 'SAS Language  Guide for Personal Computers'
  from The SAS Institute,  Inc. in Gary, North Carolina may be
  helpful.
  Specifications:  For system on diskette see, PB92-501519.
  Sponsored by Environmental Protection Agency, Washington,
  DC. Office of Emergency and Remedial Response. 143p.
  Subject Index keywords: Analytical chemistry, Environmen-
  tal surveys, Inorganic compounds,  User manuals(Computer
  programs), Waste management, Inorganic Contract Compli-
  ance Screening System.

0042 Long-Term Contracting Strategy for Superfund
  Order Number PB90-274275CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 90
  The fact sheet provides a summary of the Superfund Long-
  Term  Contracting Strategy which was developed to analyze
  the long-term contract needs of the Superfund program.
  Specifications:  6p.
  Subject  Index  keywords:   Hazardous materials,  Project
  management,  Contracts,  Superfund,  Waste  management,
  Office of Solid Waste and Emergency  Response.
0043 Long-Term Contracting Strategy for Superfund -
  implementation
  Order Number PB91-921358CDH, price: PC A01/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Emergency and Remedial Response; Jul 91
  The memorandum clarifies the roles of the Advisory Commit-
  tee and the Regions in implementing the Long-Term Con-
  tracting Strategy for Superfund.
  Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
  posit account required (minimum deposit $150 U.S., Canada,
  and Mexico; all others $300).  Single copies also available in
  paper copy or microfiche. 3p.
  Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste treat-
  ment, Superfund.
0044 Mentor-Protege Program
  Order Number PB93-963251CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Emergency and Remedial Response; Oct 92
  The document presents the conceptual framework and un-
  derstanding of the Mentor-Protege Program being introduced
  and developed within the Environmental Protection Agency
  (EPA) to stimulate the  participation of small disadvantaged
  businesses in EPA contract requirements.
  Specifications: Paper copy available  on Standing Order, de-
  posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
  and Mexico; all others $400).  Single copies also available in
  paper copy or microfiche. 10p.
  Subject Index  keywords:  Contract  administration, Small
  businesses, Environmental Protection Agency.
0045  Model Performance Standards for Superfund
  Project Officers, Deputy Project Officers, and Work
  Assignment Managers/Delivery Order Officers
  Order Number PB90-258336CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Emergency and Remedial Response; 26 Sep 88
  The directive  provides model  performance  standards  and
  suggested weightings to be used by Regions in  developing
  individual performance requirements for personnel serving in
  Superfund contract management positions.
  Specifications:  19p.
  Subject index keywords: Regulations, Project management,
  Performance standards, Contract administration,  Superfund,
  Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response.

0046  OERR Organizational Conflict of Interest Review
  and Approval Program (Superfund Management Review:
  Recommendation No. 46C)
  Order Number PB91-2149I57CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Emergency and Remedial Response; 31 Oct 89
  The directive transmits new procedures to eliminate organi-
  zational  conflicts of interest in  work assignments under Su-
  perfund  Headquarters support contracts and to take appro-
  priate steps to mitigate the perception of conflict wherever
  possible.
  Specifications:  12p.
  Subject index keywords: Superfund,  Waste management,
  Hazardous materials,  Office of  Solid Waste and Emergency
  Response.

0047  Organic Contract Compliance Screening System
  (OCCSS) Software (for Microcomputers)
  Order Number PB90-591690CDH, price: Standing Order, call
  for price     ;
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Emergency and Remedial Response; 12 Feb 90
  Organic  Contract Compliance  Screening  System (OCCSS)
  software  is a version of a mainframe-based application de-
  veloped  for the U.S.  Environmental Protection Agency's Na-
  tional  Contract  Laboratory  Program (CLP).  OCCSS is de-
  signed to automate the determination of contractural compli-
  ance and completeness of data submitted to the  EPA under
  the Routine Analytical Services (RAS) programs of CERCLA
  (Comprehensive Emergency Response Clean-up and Liability
  Act) and SARA (Superfund Amendments and Reauthoriza-
  tion Act). In order to remain consistent with the  mainframe
  system, the PC version of OCCSS is written in SAS and re-
  quires that SAS/PC be installed on the host PC.  It will load
  analytical data from  diskettes into SAS file format, perform
  technical edits on data, produce technical defect and  sum-
  mary reports, and reproduce forms which contain  defects. In
  addition,  OCCSS includes software to assist  in  identifying
  these critical structural defects in the data format,  to assist in
  identifying these for  correction  prior to performing technical
  edits. The 2/90  version of OCCSS software  is applicable to
  structural and technical checking  of diskette data in either
  format A or B.for organic analysis  under the CLP RAS 2/88
  Statement of  Work (SOW)...Software Description: The  pro-
  gram is written in the SAS programming language for imple-
  mentation on an IBM/AT.PS/2  or compatible microcomputer
  using MS DOS 3.3 operating system.

-------
                                                             ADMINISTRATIVE & MANAGEMENT: Contracting &
                                                                                              Contracts Integrity
  Specifications: The software is contained on 5 1/4-inch dis-
  kettes, high density  (1.2M),  compatible  with the IBM PC
  microcomputer. The diskettes are in the ASCII format. Price
  includes documentation,  PB90-213844. Available  on  Stand-
  ing Order, Deposit  Account required. North American Conti-
  nent price $200.00; all others write for quote. Supersedes
  PB89-944900. 1 diskette.
  Subject index keywords: Software, Contract administration,
  Monitoring,  Comprehensive Emergency Response Clean-up
  and Liability Act(CERCLA), Superfund Amendments and Re-
  authorization Act(SARA).

0048 Organic Contract Compliance Screening System
  (OCCSS) Software for the PC (Version 2/90) User Manual
  Order Number PB90-213844CDH, price: PC A08/MF A01
  Viar and Co., Alexandria, VA. Management Services Div.;
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Emergency and Remedial Response; Feb 90
  The document  is the user manual for Organic Contract Com-
  pliance Screening System (OCCSS) software. OCCSS  soft-
  ware is a version of a mainframe-based  application devel-
  oped for the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's Nation-
 . al  Contract  Laboratory Program (CLP). OCCSS is designed
  to  automate the determination of contractual  compliance and
  completeness of data submitted to  EPA under the Routine
  Analytical Services (RAS) programs  of CERCLA (Compre-
  hensive Emergency Response  Clean-up  and Liability  Act)
  and SARA  (Superfund Amendments and  Reauthorization
  Act). In order to  remain  consistent with  the mainframe
  system the PC version of OCCSS is written in SAS and re-
  quires that SAS/PC be installed on the host PC. It will  load
  analytical data  from diskettes into SAS file format, perform
  technical  edits on  the data,  produce  technical defect  and
  summary reports, and reproduce forms which show defects.
  In  addition, OCCSS includes software to detect critical struc-
  tural defects in the  data format, to assist in identifying these
  for correction prior  to performing technical edits.  The 2/90
  version of OCCSS  software is  applicable to structural  and
  technical checking of diskette data in either format A or B for
  Organic analysis under the  CLP  RAS 2/88 Statement of
  Work (SOW).
  Specifications: Supersedes  PB89-167951.  For system on
  diskette, see PB90-591690.  Sponsored  by  Environmental
  Protection Agency,  Washington, DC.  Office  of Emergency
  and Remedial Response.  167p.
  Subject index  keywords: Contract  administration, Monitor-
  ing, Comprehensive Emergency Response Clean-up and Li-
  ability Act(CERCLA), Superfund Amendments and  Reauthor-
  ization Act(SARA).

0049 Organic Contract Compliance Screening System
  (OCCSS) Software  (OLM01.8 Version 2) (for
  Microcomputers)
  Order Number PB92-502202CDH, price: D02
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Emergency and Remedial Response; 1992
  OCCSS software is  a version of a mainframe-based applica-
  tion developed  for the U.S. Environmental Protection Agen-
  cy's National Contract Laboratory Program (CLP). OCCSS is
  designed to  automate the determination of contractural com-
  pliance and  completeness  of data  submitted to the  EPA
  under  the Routine  Analytical  Services (RAS) programs of
  CERCLA (Comprehensive Emergency Response Compensa-
  tion and Liability Act). In order to remain consistent with the
  mainframe system, this PC version of OCCSS is written in
  SAS, and requires that SAS/PC be installed on the host PC.
  It will load analytical data from diskettes into SAS file format,
  perform technical edits on data, produce technical defect
  and summary  reports, and reproduce forms which contain
  defects. In addition, OCCSS  includes software to assist in
  identifying these critical structural defects in the data format,
  to assist in identifying these for correction prior to performing
  technical edits.
  Specifications: The software  is on one (1) 5 1/4 inch dis-
  kette, 1.2M high  density. File format: ASCII. Documentation
  included;  may  be  ordered  separately  as  PB92-169564.
  System: IBM AT/PS2 or compatible; MS DOS Version 3.3
  operating system. Language:  Base SAS. Supercedes PB92-
  501535. Other  formats available as PB92-501519 (ICCSS). 1
  diskette.
  Subject index keywords: Software,  Pollution regulations,
  Organic compounds, Waste management, Organic Contract
  Compliance Screening System.

0050 Organic Contract Compliance Screening System
  (OCCSS) Software (OLM01.8 Version 3) (for
  Microcomputers)
  Order Number PB93-500270CDH, price: D02
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC.
  Hazardous Site Evaluation Div; 1992
  OCCSS software  is a version  of a mainframe-based applica-
  tion developed for the U.S. Environmental  Protection Agen-
  cy's National Contract Laboratory Program (CLP). OCCSS is
  designed to automate the determination of contractural com-
  pliance and  completeness of data submitted to  the  EPA
  under the  Routine Analytical  Services (RAS) programs of
  CERCLA (Comprehensive Environmental Response Compen-
  sation and Liability Act).  In order to remain consistent with
  the mainframe system, the PC version of OCCSS is written in
  SAS, and requires that SAS/PC be installed on the host PC.
  It will load  analytical data from diskettes into SAS file format,
  perform technical edits  on data,  produce  technical defect
  and summary reports,  and reproduce forms which contain
  defects. In addition, OCCSS  includes  software to  assist in
  identifying these critical structural defects in the data format,
  to  assist in identifying these for correction prior to performing
  technical edits.
  Specifications: The software  is on one 51/4 inch diskette,
  1.2M high density. File format: Executable Code. Documenta-
  tion included; may  be ordered separately as PB92-169564.
  System: IBM AT/PS2 or compatible; MS  DOS Version 3.3
  operating system. Language: Base  SAS. Supersedes PB92-
  502202. See also  PB92-501501  (SOW  2/88/Vers. 6/90),
  and PB92-501527 (SOW 3/90). Other formats available as
  PB93-500288 (ICCSS). 1 diskette.
  Subject index  keywords: Software, Environmental surveys,
  Organic compounds, Waste management, Analytical chemis-
  try, Organic Contract Compliance Screening System.

0051  Organic Contract Compliance Screening System
  (OCCSS) Software (OLM01.8 Version 4) (for
  Microcomputers)
  Order Number PB93-505345CDH, price: D02
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC.
  Hazardous Site Evaluation Div; Apr 93
  OCCSS software  is a version of a mainframe-based  applica-
  tion developed  for the U.S. Environmental Protection Agen-

-------
ADMINISTRATIVE & MANAGEMENT: Contracting &
Contracts Integrity
  cy's National Contract Laboratory Program (CLP). OCCSS is
  designed to automate the determination of contractual com-
  pliance  and  completeness of data submitted  to the  EPA
  under the Routine Analytical Services (RAS)  programs of
  CERCLA (Comprehensive  Emergency  Response Clean-up
  and Liability Act). In order to  remain consistent with  the
  mainframe system, the  PC version of OCCSS  is written in
  SAS, and requires that SAS/PC be installed on  the host PC.
  It will load analytical data from diskettes into SAS file format,
  perform technical edits on data, produce technical defect
  and summary reports, and reproduce forms which contain
  defects. In addition, OCCSS  includes software  to assist in
  identifying these critical structural defects in the data format,
  to assist in Identifying these for correction prior to performing
  technical edits.
  Specifications: The software is on one 51/4 inch diskette,
  1.2M high density. Rle format: Executable Code. Documenta-
  tion included; may be ordered separately as PB92-169564.
  System: IBM AT  / PS2 or compatible; MS DOS Version 3.3
  operating system. Language:  Base SAS. Supersedes PB93-
  500270. See  also PB92-501535 and PB92-502202. 1  dis-
  kette.
  Subject index keywords: Software, Superfund,  Solid waste
  management, OCCSS(Organic Contract Compliance Screen-
  ing System).

0052  Organic Contract Compliance Screening  System
  (OCCSS) Software (OLM01.8 Version 5) (for
  Microcomputers)
  Order Number PB93-506053CDH, price: D02
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC.
  Hazardous Site Evaluation Div; Jul 93
  OCCSS software  is a version of a mainframe-based applica-
  tion developed for the U.S. Environmental Protection Agen-
  cy's National Contract Laboratory Program (CLP). OCCSS is
  designed to automate the determination of contractural com-
  pliance  and  completeness of data submitted  to the  EPA
  under the Routine Analytical Services (RAS)  programs of
  CERCLA (Comprehensive  Emergency  Response  Clean-up
  and Liability Act). In order to  remain consistent with  the
  mainframe system, the  PC version of OCCSS  is written in
  SAS, and requires that SAS/PC be installed on  the host PC.
  It will load analytical data from diskettes into SAS file format,
  perform technical edits on data, produce technical defect
  and summary reports, and reproduce forms which contain
  defects. In addition, OCCSS  includes software  to assist in
  identifying  these critical structural defects in the data format,
  to assist in identifying these for correction prior to performing
  technical edits.
  Specifications: The software is one 5 1/4 inch diskette,
  1.2M high density. Rle format: Executable code. Documenta-
  tion included; may be ordered separately as PB92-169564.
  System: IBM AT/PS2 or compatible; MS DOS  Version 3.3
  operating system. Language:  Base SAS. Supersedes PB93-
  505345. 2 megabytes of RAM with memory over 640K con-
  figured  as expanded memory. Hard disk with at  least 10 me-
  gabytes of available space. Printer with wide carriage or abili-
  ty to compress print. This  application  requires a minimum of
  585K of base memory. 1 diskette.
  Subject index keywords: Software, Pollution standards, Or-
  ganic compounds, Superfund.
0053  Organic Contract Compliance Screening System
  (OCCSS) Software (OLM01.8 Version 6) (for
  Microcomputers)
  Order Number PB94-501335CDH, price: D02
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Emergency and Remedial Response; Jan 94
  OCCSS software is a version of a mainframe-based applica-
  tion developed for the  U.S.  Environmental  Protection Agen-
  cy's National Contract Laboratory Program  (CLP). OCCSS is
  designed to automate the determination of contractural com-
  pliance and  completeness of data submitted to  the  EPA
  under the Routine Analytical Services (RAS) programs  of
  CERCLA (Comprehensive Environmental Response  Compen-
  sation and Liability Act). In order to remain consistent with
  the mainframe system, this PC version of OCCSS  is written
  in SAS, and  requires that  SAS/PC be installed on the host
  PC. It will load analytical  data from diskettes into SAS file
  format, perform  technical  edits on data, produce  technical
  defect  and summary reports, and reproduce forms which
  contain  defects.  In  addition, OCCSS  includes software  to
  assist in  identifying  these critical structural defects  in the
  data format, to assist in identifying these for correction prior
  to performing technical  edits.
  Specifications: The software is on one 51/4 inch diskette,
  1.2M high density. File format: Executable code. Documenta-
  tion included; may be  ordered separately as PB92-169564.
  System: IBM AT/PS2 or compatible;  MS DOS Version 3.3
  operating system. Language: Base SAS. 2MB of RAM with
  memory over 640K configured as expanded memory. Hard
  disk with at least 10MB of available space. Printer with wide
  carriage  or ability  to  compress  print. Supersedes  PB93-
  506053. See also PB93-505352 and  PB94-500642.  1 dis-
  kette.
  Subject  index keywords:  Software,  Organic  compounds,
  Waste  management, Contract management, Organic Con-
  tract Compliance  Screening System.
0054  Organic Contract Compliance Screening System
  (OCCSS) Software (SOW  February 1988) (for
  Microcomputers)
  Order Number PB92-501501CDH, price: D02
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Emergency and Remedial Response; Jun 90
  OCCSS software is a version of a mainframe-based applica-
  tion developed for the  U.S.  Environmental  Protection Agen-
  cy's National Contract Laboratory Program  (CLP). OCCSS is
  designed to automate the  determination of contractual com-
  pliance and  completeness of data submitted to  the  EPA
  under the Routine Analytical Services (RAS) programs  of
  CERCLA (Comprehensive Environmental Response  Compen-
  sation and Liability Act). In order to remain consistent with
  the mainframe system, this PC version of OCCSS  is written
  in SAS, and  requires that  SAS/PC be installed on the host
  PC. It will load analytical  data from diskettes into SAS file
  format, perform  technical  edits on data, produce  technical
  defect  and summary reports, and reproduce forms which
  contain  defects.  In  addition, OCCSS  includes software  to
  assist in  identifying  these critical structural defects  in the
  data format, to assist in identifying these for correction prior
  to performing technical  edits.
  Specifications: The software is on one (1) 5 1/4  inch dis-
  kette,  1.2M high  density. File format: ASCII. Documentation
  included; may  be  ordered  separately as  PB92-145580.
10

-------
                                                             ADMINISTRATIVE & MANAGEMENT: Contracting &
                                                                                              Contracts Integrity
  System: IBM AT/PS2  or compatible; MS DOS Version 3.3
  operating system. Language: Base SAS. 1 diskette.
  Subject index  keywords:  Software,  Organic  compounds,
  Environmental   surveys,  Waste  management,  Analytical
  chemistry, Organic Contract Compliance Screening System.
0055  Organic Contract Compliance Screening System
  (OCCSS) Software (SOW March 1990) (Version 1) (for
  Microcomputers)
  Order Number PB92-501527CDH, price: D02
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Emergency and  Remedial Response; Mar 90
  OCCSS software is a version of a mainframe-based applica-
  tion developed for the U.S.  Environmental  Protection Agen-
  cy's National Contract Laboratory Program (CLP). ICCSS is
  designed to automate the determination of contractural com-
  pliance and  completeness  of data submitted to the  EPA
  under the Routine Analytical Services (RAS) programs  of
  CERCLA (Comprehensive Environmental Response Compre-
  hensive and Liability  Act). In order to remain consistent with
  the mainframe system, this  PC version  of OCCSS is written
  in SAS, and requires that SAS/PC be installed  on the  host
  PC. It will load  analytical data from diskettes into SAS file
  format, perform  technical edits on data, produce technical
  defect  and summary reports, and reproduce  forms which
  contain defects. In  addition, ICCSS includes  software  to
  assist in  identifying  these criteria structural defects  in the
  data format, to assist in identifying these for correction  prior
  to performing technical edits.
  Specifications:  The  software is on one (1) 5 1/4 inch dis-
  kette,  1.2M high density.  File format:  ASCII. Documentation
  included;  may  be   ordered  separately as  PB92-145572.
  System: IBM AT / PS2 or compatible;  MS DOS Version 3.3
  operating system. Language: Base SAS. 1 diskette.
  Subject index keywords: Environmental surveys, Software,
  Waste management,  Organic compounds, Analytical chemis-
  try, Organic Contract  Compliance Screening System.
0056  Organic Contract Compliance Screening System
  (OCCSS) Software (SOW OLM01.8 Version January 1992)
  (Version 1) (for Microcomputers)
  Order Number PB92-501535CDH, price:  D02
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Emergency and Remedial Response; Jan 92
  OCCSS software is a version of a mainframe-based applica-
  tion developed for the  U.S.  Environmental Protection Agen-
  cy's National Contract Laboratory Program (CLP). OCCSS is
  designed to automate the determination of contractural com-
  pliance and completeness  of data submitted to the  EPA
  under the  Routine Analytical Services  (RAS)  programs  of
  CERCLA (Comprehensive Environmental Response Compre-
  hensive and Liability  Act). In order to remain consistent with
  the mainframe system, this  PC version of OCCSS is written
  in SAS, and requires that SAS/PC be  installed on the  host
  PC.  It will load analytical data from diskettes into SAS file
  format,  perform  technical edits  on  data, produce technical
  defect  and summary reports, and  reproduce forms  which
  contain defects. In  addition,  OCCSS includes software  to
  assist  in identifying  these critical structural defects in the
  data format, to assist in identifying these for correction prior
  to performing technical edits.
  Specifications: The  software is on one (1) 5 1/4 inch dis-
  kette, 1.2M high density.  File format: ASCII. Documentation
  included;  may   be  ordered  separately as PB92-145564.
  System: IBM AT / PS2 or compatible; MS DOS Version 3.3
  operating system. Language: Base SAS. Supersedes PB90-
  591690. Other formats available as PB92-501519 (ICCSS). 1
  diskette.
  Subject index keywords: Analytical chemistry, Environmen-
  tal surveys, Organic compounds, Software, Waste manage-
  ment, Organic Contract Compliance Screening System.

0057   Organic Contract Compliance Screening System.
  Software for the PC (OLM01.8 Version 1). User Manual
  Order Number PB92-145564CDH, price: PC A06/MF A02
  Viar and Co., Alexandria, VA. Environmental Services Div.;
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington,  DC. Office of
  Emergency and Remedial Response; Jan 92
  The OCCSS software is a version of a mainframe-based ap-
  plication developed for the  EPA's National Contract Labora-
  tory Program (CLP). OCCSS is designed to automate the de-
  termination of contractual compliance  and completeness of
  data submitted to EPA under the RAS  programs of CERCLA
  (Comprehensive  Environmental  Response, Compensation,
  and  Liability Act) and  SARA (Superfund  Amendments and
  Reauthorization Act). The manual provides the user with in-
  structions for running OCCSS software on the  PC. Descrip-
  tions of and instructions for each menu are detailed in the
  following sections. The user should have a working  knowl-
  edge of PC DOS prior to utilizing this system.  The following
  sections present the  OCCSS operating  environment,  de-
  scribe system output (reports), provide instructions for run-
  ning  the system and generating reports,  and  specify input
  data requirements. Examples of reports are contained in Ap-
  pendix A. Appendix B contains descriptions of  sample suffix
  codes and report defect codes.  Appendix C is a  listing of
  defect statements by criterion, with associated SOW refer-
  ences. Appendix D contains data file formats from  Exhibit H
  of the SOW. Since OCCSS PC software  is  implemented
  using Base SAS Software, the 'SAS Language Guide for Per-
  sonal Computers' from The  SAS Institute, Inc. in Gary, North
  Carolina may be helpful.
  Specifications:  For system on diskette see, PB92-501535.
  Sponsored by Environmental Protection Agency, Washington,
  DC. Office  of Emergency and Remedial Response.  117p.
  Subject index keywords: User  manuals(Computer  pro-
  grams), Environmental surveys, Waste management, Analyti-
  cal chemistry, Organic compounds, Organic Contract Compli-
  ance Screening System.

0058  Organic Contract Compliance Screening System.
  Software for the PC (OLM01.8 Version 2) (User Manual)
  Order Number PB92-169564CDH, price: PC A06/MF A02
  Viar and Co., Alexandria, VA. Environmental Services Div.;
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Emergency and Remedial Response; 1992
  The OCCSS software is a version of a  mainframe-based ap-
  plication developed for the EPA's National  Contract Labora-
  tory Program (CLP). OCCSS is designed to automate the de-
  termination of contractual compliance and  completeness of
  data submitted  to EPA  under the  RAS programs of  CERCLA
  (Comprehensive  Environmental  Response, Compensation,
  and Liability  Act) and  SARA (Superfund Amendments and
  Reauthorization Act). The manual provides the user with in-
  structions for running OCCSS software on the PC. Descrip-
  tions of and  instructions for each menu are detailed in the
                                                                                                              11

-------
ADMINISTRATIVE & MANAGEMENT: Contracting &
Contracts Integrity
  following sections. The user should have a working  knowl-
  edge of PC DOS prior to utilizing the system.
  Specifications:  For system on diskette see PB92-502202.
  Sponsored by Environmental Protection Agency, Washington,
  DC. Office of Emergency and Remedial Response. 106p.
  Subject index  keywords: User  manuals(Computer  pro-
  grams),  Pollution  regulations,  Organic  compounds,  Waste
  management,   Organic   Contract  Compliance   Screening
  System.

0059  Organic Contract Compliance Screening System.
  Software for the PC (SOW March  1990, Version 1).  User
  Manual
  Order Number PB92-145572CDH, price: PC A08/MF A02
  Viar and Co., Alexandria, VA. Environmental Services Div.;
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington,  DC. Office of
  Emergency and Remedial Response; Mar 90
  The   Organic  Contract   Compliance  Screening  System
  (OCCSS) software is a version of a mainframe-based appli-
  cation  developed for the  U.S.  Environmental  Protection
  Agency's  National Contract  Laboratory  Program  (CLP).
  OCCSS is designed to automate the determination of con-
  tractual compliance and completeness of data submitted to
  EPA under the Routine Analytical Services (RAS) programs
  of CERCLA (Comprehensive Environmental Response Com-
  pensation  and Liability Act) and SARA (Superfund Amend-
  ments  and Reauthorization Act). The manual provides  the
  user with  instructions for running OCCSS software  on  the
  PC. Descriptions  of and instructions for each  menu are  de-
  tailed in the following sections. The user should have a work-
  ing knowledge of PC  DOS prior to utilizing this system. The
  following sections present the OCCSS operating environ-
  ment, describe system output (reports), provide  instructions
  for running the system and generating  reports, and  specify
  input data requirements.  Examples of reports  are contained
  in Appendix A. Appendix B contains  descriptions of sample
  suffix codes and report defect codes. Appendix C is a listing
  of defect statements by criterion with associated  SOW refer-
  ences. Data Format A and the Agency Standard from  the Or-
  ganic RAS SOW (3/90) are included as Appendix D. Since
  OCCSS PC software  is implemented using Base SAS Soft-
  ware, the 'SAS Language Guide for Personal  Computers'
  from The SAS Institute, Inc. in Gary,  North Carolina may be
  helpful.
  Specifications: For system on diskette see,  PB92-501527.
  Sponsored by Environmental Protection Agency, Washington,
  DC. Office of Emergency and Remedial Response. 174p.
  Subject  index keywords:  User  manuals(Computer pro-
  grams), Analytical chemistry, Environmental surveys, Organic
  compounds, Waste management, Organic Contract Compli-
  ance Screening System.
0060   Organic Contract Compliance Screening System.
  Software for the PC  (Version June 1990). User Manual
  Order Number PB92-145580CDH, price: PC A08/MF A02
  Viar and Co., Alexandria, VA. Environmental Services Div.;
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Emergency and Remedial Response; Jun 90
  The   Organic  Contract  Compliance  Screening  System
  (OCCSS) software is  a version of a mainframe-based appli-
  cation developed by Viar and Company for the U.S. Environ-
  mental  Protection  Agency's National  Contract  Laboratory
  Program (CLP). OCCSS is designed to automate the determi-
  nation of contractual  compliance and completeness  of data
  submitted to EPA under  the  Routine  Analytical Services
  (RAS) programs of CERCLA (Comprehensive Environmental
  Response Compensation and Liability Act) and SARA (Su-
  perfund Amendments and Reauthorization  Act). The manual
  provides the user with instructions for running OCCSS soft-
  ware on the PC. Descriptions  of and instructions for  each
  menu are detailed in the following sections. The user should
  have a working knowledge of PC DOS prior to  utilizing this
  system. The following sections present the  OCCSS operating
  environment, describe system  output (reports), provide  in-
  structions for running the system and generating reports, and
  specify input data requirements. Examples of  reports are
  contained in Appendix A. Appendix B contains descriptions
  of sample suffix codes arid report defect codes. Appendix C
  is a listing of defect statements by  criterion with associated
  SOW references. Data Formats A and B  from the Organic
  RAS SOW (2/88) are included as Appendix D. Since OGCSS
  PC software is implemented using Base SAS Software, the
  'SAS Language Guide for  Personal Computers' from  The
  SAS Institute, Inc. in Gary, North Carolina may be helpful.
  Specifications:  For system on diskette see, PB92-501501.
  Sponsored by Environmental Protection Agency, Washington,
  DC. Office of Emergency and Remedial Response. 159p.
  Subject index  keywords:  Environmental surveys, Waste
  management, Analytical  chemistry,  User manuals(Computer
  programs), Organic compounds, Organic  Contract Compli-
  ance Screening System.

0061   Performance Tracking under ARCS  Contracts
  Order Number PB93-963276CDH, price: PC A01/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 8 Sep 92
  The directive discusses the development of a  non-resource
  intensive method for reporting performance based work allo-
  cation results  under the  ARCS (Alternative Remedial  Con-
  tracting Strategy) contractors.
  Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
  posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
  and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
  paper copy or microfiche. 3p.
  Subject index keywords:  Superfund, Waste management,
  Hazardous materials, Office  of Solid Waste and  Emergency
  Response, Alternative Remedial Contracting Strategy.

0062   Procedures to Ensure that CLP Laboratories Are
  Not Paid for Non-Compliant or Unuseable Data
  Order Number PB94-963214CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 12 Aug 93
  The memo reviews and emphasizes procedures for ensuring
  that  CLP laboratories are not paid  for non-compliant or un-
  useable data.,
  Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
  posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
  and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
  paper copy or microfiche. 32p.
  Subject index keywords:  Superfund, Laboratories, Inspec-
  tion.
 12

-------
                                                             ADMINISTRATIVE & MANAGEMENT: Contracting &
                                                                                              Contracts Integrity
 0063  Reassignment of CLP Transportation Functions
   Order Number PB93-963501CDH, price: PC A01/MF A01
   Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
   Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 19 Jan 93
   The directive discusses the reassignment of the responsibil-
   ity  of providing CLP (Contract Laboratory Program)  sample
   coolers to the regions and their support contractors.
   Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
   posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
   and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
   paper copy or microfiche. 4p.
   Subject index  keywords: Superfund,  Waste management,
   Hazardous materials, Office of Solid  Waste and Emergency
   Response.

 0064   Regional Pilot Projects and Initiatives
   Order Number PB92-963259CDH, price: PC A01/MF A01
   Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
   Emergency and Remedial Response; 28 Jan 92
   The directive discusses the initiation of regional pilot projects
   designed to make NPL site cleanup more effective, efficient,
   and/or equitable.  Pilot projects will demonstrate innovative
   ways to accomplish this objective at NPL and will, if success-
   ful,  offer similar opportunities at other sites.
   Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, De-
   posit account required (minimum  deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
   and Mexico; all  others $400). Single copies also available in
   paper copy or microfiche. 5p.
   Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste  management,
   Hazardous materials, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
   Response.

0065   Required Contracts Management Training for
   Regional Superfund Personnel
  Order Number PB93-963258CDH, price: PC A01/MF A01
   Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC.  Office of
  Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 7 Jul 92
  The memorandum establishes the required training  regarding
  the  management of contracts for all regional Superfund pro-
  gram personnel.
  Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
  posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
  and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also  available in
  paper copy or microfiche.  3p.
  Subject index  keywords: Superfund,  Training,  Contract
  management.

0066   Resources for Preparing Independent Government
  Estimates for Remedial Contracting Work Assignments
  Order Number PB93-963267CDH, price: PC A01/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 5 Aug 92
  The  memorandum provides information regarding the avail-
  ability of tools, data bases, and assistance for developing in-
  dependent government estimates of the cost of  work to be
  performed  by contractors for remedial work assignments.
  Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
  posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
  and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
  paper copy or microfiche. See also PB92-963257. 5p.
  Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste treat-
  ment, Contract administration, Superfund.
 0067  Response Action Contractor Final Indemnification
   Guidelines. Volume 2, Number 1, March 1993
   Order Number PB93-963290CDH, price: PC A01/MF A01
   Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
   Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Mar 93
   The Final Guidelines supersede  EPA's Interim Guidance on
   Indemnification which, since 1987, has prescribed the stand-
   ard terms and conditions for indemnification  agreements with
   Superfund  response  action  contractors  (RACs).  Under
   CERCLA Section 119, EPA has discretionary authority to in-
   demnify RACs for third-party damage claims based on negli-
   gent release during a response action.  The Final Guidelines
   affect all response action contracts, including  ARCS, ERGS,
   TES, and TAT. The Guidelines also impact grants, contracts
   issued by States  under  cooperative  agreements with  EPA,
   closed contracts, and contracts  awarded by the U.S. Army
   Corps of Engineers and  other Federal agencies  operating
   under interagency agreements with  EPA to cleanup Super-
   fund sites.
   Specifications: Paper copy available  on Standing Order, de-
   posit account required (minimum  deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
   and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies  also available in
   paper copy or microfiche. 4p.
   Subject index keywords: Superfund, Hazardous materials,
   Waste disposal.

0068  Revision of Policy Regarding Superfund Project
   Assignment between Alternative Remedial Contracting
   Strategy Contractors and the U.S. Army Corps of
   Engineers
   Order Number PB92-963327CDH, price:  PC A01/MF A01
   Environmental Protection  Agency, Washington,  DC. Office of
   Emergency and Remedial Response; 10 Dec 91
  The report revises the policy for assigning Superfund remedi-
   al  work  to EPA Alternative  Remedial Contracting Strategy
   (ARCs) contractors and the  U.S.  Army Corps of Engineers
   (USAGE).
  Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
  posit account required (minimum deposit $200  U.S., Canada,
  and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
  paper copy or microfiche.  4p.
  Subject  index keywords: Hazardous  materials, Government
  policies,  Waste management, Superfund.

0069  Roles and Responsibilities  of Deputy Project
  Officers and Work Assignment Managers under the
  Technical Enforcement Support (TES) Contracts
  Order Number PB91-139741CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington,  DC. Office of
  Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 17 Feb 88
  The directive provides a list of duties and responsibilities that
  Regional contacts who will now serve as Deputy Project  Offi-
  cers under  Headquarters Project Officers for the TES con-
  tracts, must now  perform in managing and  administering
  these contracts.
  Specifications:  See also PB91-139758. 12p.
  Subject  index keywords: Superfund, Waste  management,
  Hazardous materials, Office of Solid  Waste and Emergency
  Response, Technical  Enforcement Support Contract.
                                                                                                              13

-------
ADMINISTRATIVE & MANAGEMENT: Contracting &
Contracts Integrity
0070  Roles and Responsibilities of Regional Project
  Officers, Zone Project Officers, Work Assignment
  Managers and Contracting Officers for the RCRA
  Enforcement, Permitting and Assistance Contracts
  (REPA)
  Order Number PB94-963614CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington,  DC. Office of
  Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 22 Feb 94
  This directive sets out the roles and  responsibilities of the
  Regional Project Officers (RPOs), Headquarters Zone  Project
  Officers  (ZPOs),  Work Assignment  Managers (WAMs) and
  Contracting Officers (COs) of the RCRA Enforcement  Permit-
  ting and Assistance (REPA) Contracts.
  Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
  posit account required (minimum deposit $200  U.S., Canada,
  and Mexico;  all others $400). Single copies also available in
  paper copy or microfiche. 16p.
  Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste  management,
  Hazardous materials, Contractor personnel, Office of  Solid
  Waste and Emergency Response, REPA contracts.

0071  Sampler's Guide to the Contract Laboratory
  Program
  Order Number PB91-921330CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington,  DC. Office of
  Emergency and Remedial Response; Dec 90
  The Sampler's Guide provides gu idance and  direction to
  program clients. It is designed to clarify sampling procedures
  necessary to submit samples for CLP analysis. The Sam-
  pler's Guide  acts as a reference for the Regions and  sam-
  pling contractors to promote consistency in sampling proce-
  dures throughout the Regions and ensure the  proper adher-
  ence to  CLP requirements.
  Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
  posit account required (minimum deposit  $150  U.S., Canada,
  and Mexico;  all others $300). Single copies also available in
  paper copy or microfiche. 42p.
  Subject  index keywords: Superfund, Guidelines, Sample
  preparation,  Waste  management, Office of Solid Waste and
  Emergency Response, Contract Laboratory Program.
0072   Superfund Contracts Management Issues
  Order Number  PB92-963257CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
  Environmental  Protection Agency, Washington,  DC. Office of
  Emergency and Remedial Response; 31 Jan 92
  The directive initiates new requirements regarding the devel-
  opment  of independent government cost estimates, review of
  contractor invoices, and the appropriate participation on Per-
  formance Evaluation Boards.
  Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
  posit account required (minimum deposit $200  U.S., Canada,
  and Mexico;  all others $400). Single copies also available in
  paper copy or microfiche. 7p.
  Subject  index keywords: Hazardous  materials, Pollution
  control,  Contract  administration, Superfund.

0073   Superfund Program Management Manual, Fiscal
  Year 1994
  Order Number PB94-963247CDH, price: Standing Order, call
  for  price
  Environmental  Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Emergency and Remedial Response; Apr 94
  The information  in  the  Manual is targeted to  Unit, Section,
  and Branch Chiefs. Its primary purpose is to provide: The pri-
  mary program goals and priotities for FY94; and An overview
  of the Superfund program management processes (planning,
  accomplishment reporting  and program evaluation, and re-
  source allocation). The FY 94 Superfund  Program Manage-
  ment Manual consists of information on: Manager's schedule
  of significant events; Program goals and priorities; Program
  planning and reporting requirements; and Financial manage-
  ment  and FTE  distribution.  Appendix A  contains targets/
  measures and definitions for site screening and assessment/
  regional decision, early and long-term actions,  program  sup-
  port activities, enforcement, and Federal Facilities.
  Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order; de-
  posit account required ($100  U.S., Canada, and  Mexico; all
  others $200). Single copies also available  in paper copy or
  microfiche. 249p.
  Subject index keywords: Superfund, Hazardous materials,
  Waste management, Project management.

0074  Superfund Response Action Contracts
  Order Number PB93-963292CDH, price: PC A01/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Solid Waste and Emergency Response; May 93
  The fact sheet discusses the EPA's Response Action Con-
  tracts to provide  professional architect/engineer  services to
  support response planning and oversight of activities,  includ-
  ing  contract services required, contract structure, and the
  procurement process.
  Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
  posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
  and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also  available in
  paper copy or .microfiche. 4p.
  Subject index keywords:: Superfund, US  EPA, Contract ad-
  ministration, Technical assistance, Waste management.

0075  Technical Assistance Team (TAT) Contracts Users'
  Manual
  Order Number PB92-963407CDH, price: PC A09/MF A02
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington,  DC. Office of
  Emergency and Remedial Response; Dec 91
  The report provides information  and guidance on manage-
  ment  and implementation of  EPA's Technical  Assistance
  Team (TAT) for  Emergency Response, Removal, and  Pre-
  vention' contracts. Also, the study  describes the necessary
  procedures and  requirements that  should be followed  in
  managing contracts.
  Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
  posit account required (minimum  deposit $200  U.S., Canada,
  and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also  available in
  paper copy or microfiche. Supersedes PB91-214163. 178p.
  Subject index  keywords: Technical assistance, Contract
  management, Superfund.

0076  Treatability Studies Contractor Work Assignments
  Order Number PB90-273962CDH, price: PC A01/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington,  DC. Office of
  Emergency and Remedial Response; 12 Jul 90
  The directive requires all future remedial  and  removal  work
  assignments involving treatability studies to contain a provi-
  sion requiring the contract or to provide the Agency's Super-
  fund Data Base with a copy of the work products.
  Specifications: 4p.
 14

-------
                                                               ADMINISTRATIVE & MANAGEMENT: Planning &
                                                                                         Program Management
   Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste treat-
   ment, Superfund, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Re-
   sponse, Waste management.

 0077  USEPA Contract Laboratory Program National
   Functional Guidelines for Organic Data Review
   Order Number PB94-963501CDH, price: PC A07/MF A02
   Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
   Emergency and Remedial Response; Feb 93
   The document is intended to assist in the technical review of
   analytical data generated through the CLP. The data review
   process provides  information on analytical  limitations of  a
   data based Quality Control (QC) criteria.
   Specifications:  Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
   posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
   and Mexico; all  others $400). Single  copies also available in
   paper copy or microfiche. 130p.
   Subject index  keywords: Hazardous materials,  Laborato-
   ries, Chemical analysis, Superfund.

 0078  User's Guide to Contract Laboratory Program
   Order Number PB90-186396CDH, price: PC A12/MF A02
   Environmental Protection  Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
   Emergency and  Remedial Response;  Dec 88
   Describes  an organic and inorganic  analytical program and
   outlines CLP protocols implemented  into CLP analysis con-
   tracts in 1987 (inorganic) and 1988 (organic). Contains criti-
   cal information for CLP samplers and user  groups of EPA
   and of the States.
   Specifications:  255p.
   Subject index keywords: Guides(lnstructions), Laboratories,
   Contract administration, Superfund program,  Contract Labo-
   ratory Program.

 0079  User's Guide to the Contract Laboratory Program
   Order Number PB91-214296CDH, price: PC A13/MF A02
   Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
   Emergency and Remedial Response; Dec 86
   The  document was  specifically prepared for the  guidance
   and direction of  program  clients. The organic and  inorganic
   analytical program descriptions  herein outline  the require-
   ments and analytical procedures of the new CLP protocols
   developed  from  technical caucus recommendations.  These
   protocols were implemented into CLP analysis contracts in
   1985. Other analytical programs,  procedures and documenta-
  tion described herein reflect the  status of the program as of
  July 1986.
  Specifications:  278p.
  Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
   Hazardous  materials,  Chemical  analysis, Office  of  Solid
  Waste and Emergency Response, Contract Laboratory Pro-
  gram.

0080  User's Guide to the  Contract Laboratory Program
  Order Number PB91-921278CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Emergency and Remedial  Response; Jan 91
  The report describes an organic and inorganic analytical pro-
  gram and outlines Contract Laboratory Program (CLP) proto-
  cols.  Contains critical .information for CLP samplers and user
  groups in EPA and the states.
  Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
  posit account required (minimum  deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
   and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
   paper copy or microfiche. 75p.
   Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials,  Laborato-
   ries, Superfund.


 ADMINISTRATIVE & MANAGEMENT:

 Docket & Program Management

 0081  Superfund Docket Operations Manual for
 •  Rulemaking Activities
   Order Number PB91-921349CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
   Booz-Allen and Hamilton, Inc., Bethesda, MD.; Environmental
   Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of Emergency
   and Remedial Response; Jul 90
   The directive discusses the purpose of the SDIC Operations
   Manual  for Rulemaking Activities which is to serve  as a pro-
   cedural  guide for SDIC staff  when  a rulemaking  docket is
   prepared.  These procedures are evaluated  on  a regular
   basis, and are revised as needed to keep the SDIC oper-
   ationally efficient and responsive to its users.
   Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
   posit account required (minimum deposit $150 U.S., Canada,
   and Mexico;  all others $300).  Single  copies also available in
   paper copy or microfiche. Sponsored by Environmental Pro-
   tection Agency, Washington,  DC. Office of  Emergency and
   Remedial Response. 73p.
   Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste  management,
   Hazardous materials,  Manuals, Office of Solid Waste and
   Emergency Response, Superfund Docket and Information
   Center.


ADMINISTRATIVE & MANAGEMENT:

Planning  &  Program Management

0082  Accelerated Response at NPL Sites Guidance
  (Superfund Management Review: Recommendation No.
  22)
  Order Number PB90-258302CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Emergency and Remedial Response; 15 Dec 89
  The directive communicates Agency  guidance on accelerat-
  ing responses at National Priorities List (NPS) sites.
  Specifications:  19p.
  Subject  index keywords: Regulations, Superfund,  Prereme-
  dial action, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response,
  National  Priorities List.

0083  Additional Guidance on 'Worst Sites' and 'NPL
  Caliber Sites' to Assist in SACM Implementation
  Order Number PB94-963206CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 26 Aug 93
  The document is intended to  assist  the Regions by giving
  clear guidance as to what constitutes NPL caliber sites and
  to assist in minimizing the  potential  for 'false positive' NPL
  packages. It  also sets forth the actions needed to support
  the  efforts to implement SACM and  encourage appropriate
  data gathering to support NPL listing and RI/FS decisions.
  Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
  posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S.,  Canada,
                                                                                                            15

-------
ADMINISTRATIVE & MANAGEMENT: Planning &
Program Management
  and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
  paper copy or microfiche. 6p.
  Subject index keywords: Superfund, Risk assessment, Re-
  medial action, Site surveys.

0084  Assessing Sites under SACM: Interim Guidance.
  Volume 1, Number 4, Deccember 1992
  Order Number PB93-963265CDH, price: PC A01/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Dec 92
  The purpose  of the Superfund Accelerated Cleanup  Model
  (SACM) is to make Superfund cleanups more timely and effi-
  cient. This will be accomplished through more focus on the
  front end of the process and better integration of all Super-
  fund program components. The bulletin discusses assessing
  sites under SACM.
  Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
  posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
  and Mexico;  all others $400). Single copies also available in
  paper copy or microfiche. 5p.
  Subject index keywords: Site surveys, Superfund, Remedial
  action,  Waste management, Cleanup operations, Superfund
  Accelerated Cleanup Model.

0085  Audit Management Process. Reference Guide
  Order Number PB94-963232CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Emergency and Remedial Response; Mar 94
  Federal law requires Executive and Federal Branch agencies
  to institute programs designed to respond to and follow-up
  on audits issued by the Agency's Office of Inspector General
  (OIG) and the General Accounting  Office (GAO), the two
  main bodies which audit EPA programs and activities. The
  audit management process is comprised of three main activi-
  ties; cooperating with auditors  to provide information,  re-
  sponding to the audits, and implementing audit recommenda-
  tions to correct deficiencies found during the investigation.
  The reference guide is designed to describe the audit man-
  agement process, relevant terms, roles and  responsibilities
  of participants, and helpful hints and tools for full compli-
  ance. General language is used to discuss the overall proc-
  ess within EPA,  but this  guide  is primarily geared toward
  Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response (OSWER)
  and Office of Emergency  and Remedial Response (OERR)
  managers and staff.
  Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
  posit account required (minimum  deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
  and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also  available in
  paper copy or microfiche. 36p.
  Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
  Auditing.
0086 Audits and the Superfund Program Manager
  Order Number PB90-272717CDH, price: PC A01/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Emergency and Remedial Response; Jan 90
  The fact sheet describes why audits of all  parties to Cooper-
  ative Agreements and Superfund State Contracts (SSCs) are
  good business practices and how audits help EPA protect
  the financial integrity of Superfund response agreements.
  Specifications: 4p.
  Subject index keyword:;: Project management, Auditing,
  Superfund, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response,
  Waste management.

0087  Audits and the Superfund Program Manager
  Order Number PB92-963328CDH, price: PC A01/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Emergency and Remedial Response; Oct 91
  The report describes why audits of all parties to Cooperative
  Agreements and Superfund State  Contracts are  good  busi-
  ness practices, and how  audits help EPA protect the finan-
  cial integrity of Superfund response agreements.
  Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
  posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
  and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
  paper copy or microfiche. Supersedes PB90-272717. 2p.
  Subject index  keywords: Hazardous materials,  Pollution
  control, Project management, Auditing, Superfund.

0088  Community Relations: Use of Senior Environmental
  Employees in Superfund (Superfund Management
  Review: Recommendation 43.K.L)
  Order Number PB90-273749CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Emergency and Remedial Response; 31 Aug 90
  The directive describes the use of Senior Environmental Em-
  ployees in the Superfund program and offers guidance on
  their future use.
  Specifications:  6p.
  Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Personnel,
  Elderly persons, Superfund, Community relations, Office of
  Solid Waste and Emergency Response, Citizen participation,
  Waste management.

0089  Early Action and Long-Term Action under SACM:
  Interim Guidance, Volume 1, Number 2, December 1992
  Order Number PB93-963263CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Dec 92
  The purpose of the Superfund Accelerated Cleanup Model
  (SACM) is to make Superfund cleanups more timely and effi-
  cient. This will  be accomplished through more focus on the
  front end of the process and better integration of all Super-
  fund program  components. The  SACM  Bulletin discusses
  early and  long term actions that the Region should consider
  taking under SACM.
  Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
  posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
  and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also  available  in
  paper copy or microfiche. 6p.
  Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
  Remedial  action,  Superfund Accelerated  Cleanup Model,
  Cleanup operations.
0090  Enforcement under SACM: Interim Guidance.
  Volume 1, Number 3, December 1992
  Order Number PB93-963264CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Dec 92
  The  purpose of the Superfund Accelerated Cleanup Model
  (SACM) is to make  Superfund cleanups more timely and effi-
  cient. This will be accomplished through  more focus on the
  front end  of the process and better integration of all Super-
 16

-------
    fund program components. The bulletin discusses major en-
    forcement areas affected by SACM including: The timing and
    methodology of PRP searches; timing and content of negoti-
    ations with  PRPs; notice letters; consultations for early ac-
    tions;  state  involvement in enforcement; de minimis  settle-
    ments; the  availability and  adequacy  of  administrative
    records; and cost recovery and cost documentation.
    Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
    posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U S Canada
    and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
    paper copy or microfiche. 7p.
    Subject index  keywords:  Superfund,  Remedial  action
    Waste management,  Hazardous materials, Superfund Accel-
    erated Cleanup Model.

 0091  Exercising Flexibility through the Superfund
    Accelerated Cleanup Model  (SACM)
    Order Number PB93-963253CDH, price: PC A01/MF A01
    Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
    Emergency and Remedial Response; Oct 92
    The directive reaffirms the Office of Solid Waste and Emer-
    gency Response's commitment to supporting regional offices
    in soundly-based decision-making while implementing the Su-
   perfund Accelerated Cleanup Model.
   Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order de-
   posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S  Canada
   and Mexico;  all others $400).  Single copies also available in
   paper copy or microfiche. See  also PB93-963252. 3p.
   Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management
   Hazardous materials, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
   Response, Superfund Accelerated Cleanup Model.
 0092  Expectations for Full Implementation of SACM
   Order Number PB94-963219CDH, price: PC A01/MF A01
   Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
   Emergency and Remedial Response; 28 Jan 94
   Below are the expectations for implementation of the Super-
   fund  Accelerated Cleanup Model (SACM). They have been
   jointly developed by Headquarters and the Regions. There
   are a few key points to be emphasized: SACM is the usual
   way of doing business at Superfund sites; Regions should
   have an up-to-date site inventory and workplan; and Regions
   substantially reduce the Site  Inspection  Prioritization (SIP)
   backlog.                                            '
   Specifications: Paper  copy available on Standing Order  de-
   posit account required  (minimum deposit $200 U.S. Canada
   and Mexico; all others  $400). Single copies also available in
   paper copy or microfiche. 5p.

  !A!%^ 'ndex keywords: Superfund,  Site characterization,
  SACM(Superfund Accelerated Cleanup Model).

0093  Further Direction on Implementing the Superfund
  Accelerated Cleanup Model (SACM)
  Order Number PB93-963291CDH, price: PC  A02/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  bolid Waste and Emergency Response; 27 Apr 93
  The memorandum provides a summary of progress to date in
  implementing SACM and refines goals and strategies in tran-
  sitionmg to full implementation in FY 1994.
  Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
  posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S. Canada
 and  Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
 paper copy or microfiche. 6p.
                                                                  ADMINISTRATIVE & MANAGEMENT: Planning &
                                                                                            Program Management
    Subject index keywords: Superfund, Hazardous materials,
    Waste  disposal,  SACM(Superfund  Accelerated  Cleanup
    Model).

 0094  Guidance on Implementation of the Superfund
    Accelerated Cleanup Model (SACM) under CERCLA and
    the NCP
    Order Number PB93-963252CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
    Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
    Emergency and Remedial Response; 7 Jul 92
   The directive provides a more precise description of the Su-
   perfund Accelerated Cleanup  Model (SACM)  in  order  to
   ensure its consistent application with CERCLA and the NCP.
   Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
   posit account  required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
   and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
   paper copy or microfiche. 12p.
   Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
   Hazardous materials, Office of  Solid Waste and Emergency
   Response, Superfund Accelerated Cleanup Model.

 0095  Highlights: Superfund Program Management. Fiscal
   Year 1993
   Order Number PB93-963261CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
   Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
   Emergency and Remedial Response; Oct 92
   The manual is targeted to EPA Superfund Division Directors.
   It is intended to provide an  overview of Fiscal Year 1993 Su-
   perfund program goals and management initiatives. Specifi-
   cally the document contains information on strategic planning
   goals and themes, program planning and budgeting, and
   manager's schedule of significant events.
   Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
   posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
   and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
   paper copy or microfiche.  37p.
  Subject index keywords:  Hazardous  materials,  Project
  management, Superfund.

0096  HSIED SACM Report. Volume 1, Number 1, January
  1993
  Order Number PB93-963289CDH, price: PC A01/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Jan 93
  The bulletin is issued by the Hazardous Site  Evaluation Divi-
  sion to keep regional staff up-to-date on program and proce-
  dural changes  resulting  from the  Superfund Accelerated
  Cleanup  Model.
 Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
 posit account required (minimum  deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
 and  Mexico; all  others $400). Single copies also available in
 paper copy or microfiche. 2p.
 Subject Index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste man-
 agement, Remedial action, Superfund Accelerated Cleanup
 Model(SACM), Waste removal.
                                                                                                              17

-------
ADMINISTRATIVE & MANAGEMENT: Planning &
Program Management


0097  Innovative Methods to Increase Public Involvement
  in Superfund Community Relations (Superfund
  Management Review Recommendation No. 43.A)
  Order Number PB91-921344CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Emergency and Remedial Response; 30 Nov 90
  The directive lists six (6) techniques proven effective in in-
  creasing public involvement in the Superfund process. While
  some are recent innovations, others were developed many
  years ago, but new and better ways of using them have bol-
  stered their effectiveness. These techniques are citizen work
  groups, citizen  superfund workshops, bilingual communica-
  tion, citizen awards for participation, increased  interviews,
  and open nous availability sessions. The list does not pre-
  tend to be exhaustive. Instead, it shows some of the out-
  reach vehicles Regions  have found to  be particularly effec-
  tive in encouraging  citizen   participation.  Regions should
  make every effort to integrate as many as possible of these
  activities into the cleanup process.
  Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
  posit  account required (minimum deposit $150 U.S., Canada,
  and Mexico; all others $300). Single copies also available  in
  paper copy or microfiche. 6p.
  Subject index keywords: Superfund,  Waste  management,
  Hazardous materials, Office  of Solid Waste and  Emergency
  Response.
 0098 Integrated Timeline for Superfund Site Management
   (SMR 5,15)
   Order Number PB91-139717CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
   Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
   Emergency and Remedial Response; 11 Jun 90
   The directive displays the key steps and optimum duration of
   phases in moving sites from  identification to remediation. It is
   the authors intention that the duration of key  phases  be
   viewed as goals toward which will jointly work to move the
   program.
   Specifications: 15p.
   Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
   Hazardous materials, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
   Response.
  0099  Involvement of Superfund Program Managers in
   Superfund Response Agreement Audits
   Order Number PB90-249731CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
    Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office  of
    Emergency and Remedial Response; 12 Feb 90
   The directive provides  general reference information  to Su-
    perfund program managers  about the  audit process. The in-
    formation in the  Directive pertains primarily to audits  of Co-
    operative Agreements,  but  may be applied to audits  of Su-
    perfund State Contracts (SSCs).
    Specifications:  20p.
    Subject index keywords: Regulations, State  government,
    Auditing, Superfund,  Remedial action, Office of  Solid Waste
    and Emergency Response, Cooperative agreements.
0100  Making Superfund Documents Available to the
  Public throughout the Cleanup Process, and Discussing
  Site Findings and Decisions as They are Developed
  (Superfund Management Review: No. 43 G, H, Q, R, T)
  Order Number PB91-921322CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington,  DC. Office of
  Emergency and Remedial Response; 5 Nov 90
  The directive  summarizes five recommendations for improv-
  ing Superfund efforts towards timely release of information to
  the public during site cleanup activities. It provides guidance
  for the Regions to  make documents available to the public
  throughout the cleanup process and to discuss site findings
  and decisions as they are  developed for the  sake of more
  fully involving citizens  in the cleanup process and ensuring
  two way communication between Superfund staff and  local
  communities.
  Specifications: Paper copy available on  Standing Order, de-
  posit account required (minimum deposit  $150 U.S., Canada,
  and Mexico; all  others $300). Single copies  also available in
  paper copy or microfiche. 8p.
  Subject index  keywords:  Superfund, Waste management,
  Hazardous materials, Remedial  action, Office of Solid Waste
  and Emergency Response.
 0101  Management  Review of the Superfund  Program
  Order Number PB90-153875CDH, price: PC A09/MF A01
   Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC; 1989
  Contents: A  clear strategy for Superfund; Strengthening en-
  forcement and  maximizing responsible party work at Super-
   fund sites; Accelerating and improving remedial action; Bring-
   ing innovative technologies to bear on pollution at superfund
   sites to strengthen remedy selection; An aggressive program
   of community involvement;  Management and administration:
   Freeing up the skills and tools  to do the job;  Accounting for
   achievement: Communicating progress to the public.
   Specifications: Also available from Supt. of Docs. See also
   PB90-153883. 186p.
   Subject index keywords:  Management, Hazardous materi-
   als, Pollution control, Superfund program.
 0102 Management Review of the Superfund Program:
   Implementation Plan
 • Order Number  PB90-153883CDH, price:  PC A08/MF A01
   Environmental  Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
   Emergency and Remedial Response; 21  Sep 89
   The Superfund 90-Day Study set  forth a  comprehensive
   long-term strategy for the Superfund Program. The basic ele-
   ments of the strategy are  to: Control acute threats immedi-
   ately;  Deal  with the worst sites and worst problems first;
   Carefully monitor and maintain sites over the long term; Em-
   phasize  enforcement to induce private-party  cleanup;  Seek
   new technologies  for more effective cleanup; Improve the ef-
   ficiency of program operations; and Encourage full participa-
   tion by communities.
   Specifications: Also available from Supt. of Docs. See also
    PB90-153875. 173p.
   Subject index keywords: Management, Hazardous materi-
    als, Pollution control, Superfund Program, 90  day study.
  18

-------
                                                                 ADMINISTRATIVE & MANAGEMENT: Planning &
                                                                                           Program Management
  0103  Mandatory Community Relations Training
    Superfund Management Review Implementation Product
    (Recommendation: No. 43.P(i))
    Order Number PB90-272592CDH, price: PC A01/MF A01
    Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
    hmergency and Remedial Response; 1 Dec 89
    The directive formally announces mandatory community rela-
    tions training for Remedial  Project Managers, On-Scene Co-
    ordinators  and  other  Regional  staff and  managers  who
    attend public meetings or deal with the public. The directive
    explains what the requirements are, and why the training is
    necessary.                                        a
    Specifications: 5p.

    Subject index keywords:  Personnel  development, Project
    J?TJ*8fITient' Community  relations,  Superfund,  Office of
    Solid Waste and Emergency Response.

 °1«i..Mandatory Trainin9 Requirements for OCSs and
    RPMs
    Order Number PB90-272584CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
    Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC Office of
    Emergency and Remedial Response; 29 Sep 89
   The directive  formally announces the mandatory training re-
   Pr^rt8MS f°r °nfoore Coord™«>™ (OSCs) and Remedial
   Project Managers (RPMs) at all levels. Addresses Congres-
   8!?V«r    management,  and employee concerns raised
   about the  preparation of OSCs and RPMs to perform their
   JODS.
   Specifications: 6p.

   ^enlinde,Xo^r)rds:  Personnel development, Super-
   fund, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response.

 0105  Minimizing Problems Caused by Staff Turnover
   
-------
ADMINISTRATIVE & MANAGEMENT: Planning &
Program Management
  Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
  posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
  and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
  paper copy or microfiche. 2p.
  Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
  Hazardous materials, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
  Response, Superfund Accelerated Cleanup Model, Pilot pro-
  grams.
0111   SACM Regional Decision Teams: Interim Guidance.
  Volume 1, Number 5, December 1992
  Order Number PB93-963266CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Dec 92
  The purpose of the Superfund Accelerated  Cleanup  Model
  (SACM) is to make Superfund cleanups more timely and effi-
  cient. This will be accomplished through more focus on the
  front end of the process and better integration of all Super-
  fund program components. The bulletin discusses the Re-
  gional Decision Team under SACM. The Regional  Decision
  Team provides for broad participation across all program ele-
  ments while placing emphasis on teamwork and  Regional
  and staff empowerment.
  Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
  posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
  and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
  paper copy or microfiche. 6p.
  Subject Index keywords: Superfund, Waste  management,
   Remedial  action, Regional  Decision Team, Cleanup oper-
   ations, Superfund Accelerated Cleanup Model.
 0112  SRIS System Overview and User's Guide
   Order Number PB94-963233CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
   Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
   Emergency and Remedial Response; Mar 94
   Federal law requires Executive and Federal Branch agencies
   to institute programs designed to respond to  and  follow  up
   on audits issued by the Agency's Office of Inspector General
   (OIG) and the General  Accounting Office  (GAO), the two
   main bodies which audit EPA programs and  activities. The
   audit management process is comprised of three main activi-
   ties; cooperating with auditors to  provide information,  re-
   sponding to audits, and implementing audit recommendations
   to correct deficiencies found  during the investigation. The
   reference guide is  designed to introduce  the audit manage-
   ment process tool  available to the Office of Emergency and
   Remedial Response (OERR) managers and staff, Superfund
   Report Information System (SRIS): a description of SRIS and
   its operation is provided.
   Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order,  de-
   posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
   and Mexico; all others $400).  Single copies also available in
   paper copy or microfiche. 20p.
   Subject index  keywords:  Superfund, Pollution control,  Au-
   diting.
  0113  Status of Key SACM Program Management Issues:
    Interim Guidance, Volume 1, Number 1, December 1992
    Order Number PB93-963262CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
    Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
    Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Dec 92
    The purpose of the Superfund Accelerated Cleanup Model
    (SACM) is to make Superfund cleanups more timely and  effi-
    cient. This will  be accomplished through more focus on the
 fron end of the process and better integration  of all Super-
 fund  program components. The  SACM  Program Manage-
 ment Update describes activities underway, planned, and re-
 cently completed to refocus Superfund's program manage-
 ment systems to support SACM implementation.
 Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
 posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
 and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
 paper copy or microfiche. 6p.
 Subject index  keywords: Superfund, Remedial  action,
 Waste management, Management  planning, Superfund Ac-
 celerated Cleanup Model, Cleanup operations.
0114  status of State Involvement in the Superfund
  Program, FY 80 to FY 89
  Order Number PB90-272725CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Emergency and Remedial Response; Apr 90
  The report summarizes state involvement throughout the Su-
  perfund process since the passage of the  Comprehensive
  Environmental  Response,   Compensation, and Liability Act
  (CERCLA). The report includes the roles and responsibilities
  of States; an overview of the Superfund process and phases
  of response; an historical  perspective  on State involvement
  in each phase of response at Superfund Sites; and a sum-
  mary of State involvement in non-site specific activities.
  Specifications: 37p.
  Subject index  keywords: Project planning,  State govern-
  ment, Superfund.
 0115  Superfund Accelerated Cleanup Bulletin:
  Presumptive Remedies for Municipal Landfill Sites.
  Volume 2, Number 1, February  1993
  Order Number PB93-963269CDH, price: PC A01/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Feb 93
  Since Superfund's inception in 1980, the removal and reme-
  dial programs have  found that  certain categories of sites
  have similar characteristics, such  as  the types of  contami-
   nants present,  past  industrial  use,  or the  environmental
   media that  are affected.  Based on a wealth of  information
   acquired from evaluating and cleaning up these sites, Super-
   fund is undertaking an initiative to develop presumptive rem-
   edies that are appropriate for specific  types  of sites, contami-
   nants,  or both. The  initiative is part of a larger  program
   known as  the  Superfund  Accelerated  Cleanup  Model
   (SACM), which is designed to speed  all aspects of the Su-
   perfund clean-up process. The objective of the presumptive
   remedies initiative is to use clean-up techniques shown to be
   effective in the past at similiarsite in  the future. The  use of
   presumptive remedies will streamline removal  actions, site
   studies, and clean-up actions, thereby improving consistency,
   reducing costs, and  increasing the speed with which hazard-
   ous waste sites are remediated.
   Specifications: Paper copy available  on Standing Order, de-
   posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
   and Mexico; all others $400). Single  copies also available in
   paper copy or microfiche.  2p.
   Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
    Hazardous materials,  Remedial action, Superfund Acceler-
    ated Cleanup Model.
  20

-------
                                                                 ADMINISTRATIVE & MANAGEMENT: Planning &
                                                                                            Program Management
 0116  Superfund Accelerated Cleanup Bulletin:
   Presumptive Remedies for Wood Treatment Facilities
   Volume 1, Number 2, May 1992
   Order Number PB92-963361CDH, price: PC A01/MF A01
   Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
   Emergency and Remedial Response; May 92
   Superfund is undertaking an initiative to develop presumptive
   remedies that are appropriate for specific types of sites, con-
   taminants, or both. The initiative is part of a larger program,
   known as   the  Superfund  Accelerated  Cleanup  Model
   (SACM), which is designed to speed all aspects of the Su-
   perfund clean-up process. The issue of the Superfund Accel-
   erated Cleanup Bulletin describes  presumptive remedies for
   wood treatment facilities.
   Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
   posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada
   and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
   paper copy or microfiche. 2p.
   Subject   index  keywords:  Superfund,  Remedial  action
   Waste management, Wood preservatives, Hazardous materi-
   als, Cleanup operations, Wood treatment facilities.

 0117  Superfund Accelerated Cleanup Bulletin. Volume 1,
   Number 1. Presumptive Remedies for Municipal Landfill
   Sites
   Order Number PB92-963367CDH, price: PC A01/MF A01
   Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
   Emergency and Remedial Response; Apr 92
   The bulletin provides an overview of the presumptive  reme-
   dies initiative. The objective of the presumptive remedies ini-
   tiative is to use clean-up technologies shown to be effective
   in the past at similar sites in the future. The use of presump-
   tive remedies will streamline removal actions, site studies,
   and clean-up  actions, thereby improving consistency, reduc-
   ing  costs,  and increasing  the speed with which  hazardous
  waste sites are remediated.
  Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
  posit account required (minimum deposit $200  U.S., Canada
  and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
  paper copy or microfiche. See also PB92-963371. 1p.
  Subject index keywords: Municipalities, Hazardous materi-
  als, Pollution control, Superfund.

0118  Superfund Accelerated Cleanup Bulletin. Volume 1,
  Number 3. Presumptive Remedies
  Order Number PB92-963371CDH, price: PC A01/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Emergency and Remedial Response; Aug 92
  The bulletin outlines the Superfund  efforts underway for de-
  veloping presumptive remedies for various types of sites. The
  objective of the presumptive remedies initiative  is to use
  clean-up techniques  shown to be  effective  in the  past at
  similar sites in the future. The use of presumptive remedies
  will streamline removal actions, site studies, and clean-up ac-
  tions, thereby improving consistency, reducing costs, and in-
  creasing the speed with which hazardous waste sites are re-
  mediated.
 Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
 posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
 and  Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
 paper copy or microfiche. See also PB92-963367. 2p.
    Subject  index  keywords: Superfund,  Waste management,
    Hazardous materials, Remedial action, Technology assess-
    ment, Cleanup operations.

 0119  Superfund Accelerated Cleanup Model (SACM)
    Order Number PB92-963263CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
    Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
    Emergency and  Remedial Response; Mar 92
    The  document details the Superfund Accelerated  Cleanup
    Model  (SACM),  the Office of Emergency and  Remedial Re-
    sponse's new model for streamlining and accelerating the
    Superfund  program. The concept has been  designed  to
    make Superfund work better and deliver results  the public
   will value: (1) quick reduction of acute risks at all  Superfund
   sites (removal and remedial) and (2) restoration of the  envi-
   ronment over the long term.
   Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing  Order, de-
   posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
   and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
   paper copy or microfiche. 30p.
   Subject index keywords:  Sites, Hazardous  materials, Su-
   perfund, Cleanup.

 0120  Superfund Accelerated Cleanup Model (SACM)
   Coordination Strategy
   Order Number PB94-963201CDH, price: PC A01/MF A01
   Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
   Solid Waste and  Emergency Response; 14 Sep 93
   The memorandum introduces a coordination strategy that  is
   designed  to  promote the implementation of the Superfund
   Accelerated Cleanup Model (SACM).
   Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
   posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
   and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
   paper copy or microfiche. 4p.
   Subject index keywords: Superfund, Hazardous  materials,
   Waste management, Directives, Cleanup.

0121  Superfund Accelerated Cleanup Model (SACM):
   Questions and Answers
   Order Number PB93-963286CDH, price: PC A01/MF A01
   Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC.  Office of
   Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Jul 93
   The bulletin provides answers to issues the Regions have
   raised   on  the  Superfund  Accelerated  Cleanup  Model
   (SACM).
  Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order,  de-
   posit account required (minimum deposit $225 U.S., Canada,
  and Mexico; all others $450). Single copies also available in
  paper copy or microfiche. 5p.
  Subject index keywords: Hazardous  materials, Waste dis-
  posal, Remedial action, SACM(Superfund Accelerated  Clean-
  up Model).

0122  Superfund Accelerated Cleanup  Model (SACM).
  Volume  1, Number 4, November 1992
  Order Number PB92-963287CDH, price: PC A01/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Emergency and Remedial Response; Nov 92
  The U.S. EPA currently is developing  and implementing a
  streamlined way to clean up hazardous waste sites known as
  the  Superfund Accelerated Cleanup  Model,  or  SACM. It is
  designed to make the Superfund Program more efficient by
                                                                                                              21

-------
ADMINISTRATIVE & MANAGEMENT: Planning &
Program Management
  cutting years off of cleanups and quickly reducing risks to
  people and the environment. This bulletin issue provides an
  overview of the Superfund Accelerated Cleanup Model.
  Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
  posit account required (minimum deposit $200, U.S., Canada,
  and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
  paper copy or microfiche. 1 p.
  Subject  index  keywords:  Superfund,  Remedial  action,
  Mathematical models, Waste management, Superfund Accel-
  erated Cleanup Model, Cleanup operations.
0123 Superfund Program and Information Management
  Update. Volume 1, Number 1, November 1993
  Order Number PB94-963208CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
  Environmental  Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Nov 93
  This is the first edition of a new technical bulletin combining
  the information previously found in the SCAP Bulletin, CER-
  CLIS  Connection, SMARTech Signal, and RP2M Reflection.
  Merging  these  publications  into   an all-inclusive  bulletin
  serves  two purposes:  (1)  it conforms  to  recent internal
  Agency direction to ensure that all 'bulletins' be technical in
  nature; and (2) it uses  contractor and EPA funds more effi-
  ciently.
  Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
  posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
  and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
  paper copy or microfiche. 8p.
  Subject index keywords: Superfund, Information manage-
  ment, Program management.
 0124  Superfund Program Implementation Manual, Fiscal
  Year 1994. Volume 1. Program Goals and Planning
   Requirements. Volume 2. Program Implementation
   Procedures
   Order Number PB94-963220CDH, price: PC A24/MF A04
   Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
   Emergency and Remedial Response; Oct 93
   The  Information  in the manual is  targeted to  Information
   Management Coordinators, Remedial Project Managers, and
   On-Scene Coordinators.  Its primary purpose is to provide
   guidance to this audience on management of Superfund pro-
   gram. The FY 94 Superfund Program Implementation Manual
   consists of two volumes. Volume  1 contains information on
   program goals and priorities, program planning and reporting,
   and budget and workload models. Volume 2 includes appen-
   dices providing information  on  specific programs and acts
   and their applicability to Superfund Comprehensive Accom-
   plishments Program (SCAP).
   Specifications: Paper  copy available on Standing Order, de-
   posit account required  (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
   and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies  also available in
   paper copy or microfiche. 565p.
   Subject Index keywords: Superfund, Hazardous materials,
   Waste management.
  0125  Superfund Responsiveness Summaries (Superfund
   Management Review: Recommendation Number 43E)
   Order Number PB90-273731CDH,  price: PC A02/MF A01
   Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
   Emergency and Remedial Response; 4 Jun 90
   The directive describes the  background of responsiveness
   summaries and  outlines a new format intended to provide
   summaries that can deal thoroughly with complicated legal
  and technical  issues while maintaining true responsiveness
  to local communities.
  Specifications:  6p.
  Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials,  Superfund,
  Management review, Office of Solid Waste and  Emergency
  Response, Waste management, Community relations.

0126  Superfund Strategic Plan and Implementation
  Strategy Fiscal Year 1994
  Order Number PB94-963245CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Emergency and  Remedial Response; Jan 94
  This Plan presents the Superfund Program's strategic direc-
  tion for Fiscal  Year 1994. The Vision for the program is:: Build
  public confidence in the Superfund and  Oil  Pollution Re-
  sponse  Programs; The  Mission for the program is: Super-
  fund- dedicated  to reducing risks to people and the environ-
  ment by cleaning up the Nation's hazardous waste problems
  and making polluters pay.
  Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
  posit account required (minimum deposit $200  U.S., Canada,
  and Mexico; all  others $400). Single copies also available in
  paper copy or microfiche. See also PB94-963246. 73p.
  Subject  index keywords:  Hazardous materials, Program
  management, Cleanup,  Pollution control,  Superfund, Strate-
  gic planning.
 0127  Superfund Strategic Plan and Implementation
  Strategy Fiscal Year 1994: Office and  Division Plans
  Order Number PB94-963246CDH, price: PC A06/MF A02
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Emergency and Remedial Response; Jan 94
  The Plan  presents the  Superfund Program's strategic direc-
  tion for Fiscal Year 1994. The Vision for the program is: Build
  public confidence  in the Superfund and Oil  Pollution  Re-
  sponse Programs;  The Mission for the program is:  Super-
  fund: dedicated to  reducing  risks to people and  the environ-
  ment by cleaning up the Nation's hazardous waste problems
  and making polluters pay. Oil Pollution: dedicated to ensuring
  the protection of human health and the environment from oil
  pollution.
  Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
  posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
  and Mexico; all others  $400). Single copies also available in
   paper copy or microfiche. See also PB94-963245. 122p.
  Subject index keywords:  Hazardous  materials, Program
   management, Cleanup, Pollution control,  Superfund, Strate-
   gic planning.
 0128  Using State and Local Officials to Assist in
   Community Relations (Superfund Management Review:
   Recommendation No. 43.K,L)
   Order Number  PB91-921320CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
   Environmental  Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
   Emergency and Remedial Response; 28 Sep 90
   The  report outlines the suggestion and discusses  specific
   methods for using  State and local officials to increase Super-
   fund's  communication  with the public. The study discusses
   recommendations  that describe  the use  of State and  local
   officials to serve as liaisons, to provide and maintain informa-
   tion, and to assist in public meetings.
   Specifications: Paper  copy available on  Standing Order, de-
   posit account required  (minimum deposit  $150 U.S., Canada,
  22

-------
                                                                     ADMINISTRATIVE & MANAGEMENT: Special
                                                                                                          Reports
    and Mexico; all others $300). Single copies also available in
    paper copy or microfiche. 6p.
    Subject index  keywords: Community relations, Hazardous
    materials, Superfund, US EPA.


 ADMINISTRATIVE & MANAGEMENT:
 Special  Reports

 0129   Assurance of Hazardous Waste Capacity, Guidance
   to State Officials. Assistance in Fulfilling the
   Requirements of CERCLA 104(c)(9)
   Order Number PB91-214171CDH, price: PG A05/MF A01
   Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
   Emergency and Remedial Response; Dec 88
   The document supplies guidance to state officials on provid-
   ing assurances required by Section 104(c)(9) of the Compre-
   hensive Environmental  Response, Compensation, and Liabil-
   ity Act, as amended ('CERCLA' or 'Superfund'). This section
   of CERCLA requires states in which remedial actions  may be
   taken to provide assurances, prior to EPA taking or  funding
   such actions, of the availability of hazardous waste treatment
   or disposal  facilities  which  have adequate  capacity  to
   manage  the hazardous wastes  expected within  the state
   over twenty years. The  Guidance Document reflects EPA's
   current understanding of the statutory requirements and de-
   scribes  how  EPA currently  suggests that states implement
   these requirements. The guidance provides substantial infor-
   mation to states, including  suggested language for the con-
   tracts and cooperative agreements to be signed, instructions
   on the preparation of state Capacity Assurance Plans  (CAPs)
   that  can  form a  basis for the  assurances, and a model for
   the interstate agreements or regional agreement or authority
   required when addressing access to capacity in other states.
   Specifications: 81 p.
   Subject index keywords:  Superfund, Waste management
   Hazardous materials, Office of Solid Waste and  Emergency
   Response.

0130  CERCLA/Superfund Orientation Manual
   Order Number PB93-193852CDH, price: PC A09/MF A02
   Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
   Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Oct 92
   The manual serves as a program orientation guide and refer-
   ence document, and it is designed to assist EPA and State
   personnel involved with hazardous waste remediation, emer-
   gency response, and chemical  and emergency prepared-
   ness. The Manual  describes the organizational  and oper-
  ational components of the Superfund Program.
  Specifications:  179p.
  Subject  index keywords: Superfund, Hazardous materials,
  Waste disposal, CERCLA.

0131  CERCLA Waste Capacity Assurance
  Order Number PB90-274507CDH, price: PC A01/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Emergency and Remedial Response; Aug 90
 The fact sheet discusses waste capacity assurance, which is
 one of the five assurances required of  a State by CERCLA
 before the hazardous waste Trust Fund (Superfund) can be
 used for a remedial action. The  sheet describes the statutory
 goals associated with the waste capacity assurance, the Ca-
   pacity Assurance Plan (CAP), and additional sources of infor-
   mation.
   Specifications:  5p.
   Subject index  keywords: Hazardous  materials, Capacity,
   Superfund, Waste management, Office  of Solid Waste and
   Emergency Response, Remedial action.

 0132  Cleaning Up the Nation's Waste Sites: Markets and
   Technology Trends
   Order Number PB93-140762CDH, price: PC$17.50
   Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC.
   Technology Innovation Office.; Department of Defense,
   Washington, DC.**Department of Energy, Washington,  DC-
   Apr 93
   Over the next 20 to 30 years, federal, state, and local gov-
   ernments and private industry will commit billions of dollars
   annually to clean up sites  contaminated  with  hazardous
   waste and  petroleum products. The report captures  informa-
   tion on the future demand for remediation services for all
   major cleanup programs in the U.S., including Superfund, Re-
   source Conservation and Recovery Act  (RCRA) corrective
   action, underground storage tanks, state programs, and fed-
   eral agencies such as the Departments of Defense and
   Energy. The market information should help innovative tech-
   nology vendors,  developers,  and investors direct their re-
   search, development, and commercialization efforts  towards
   pertinent waste programs and problems. The report makes
   this  market information  available  in  one  document.  The
   report provides a compilation of market data that are  current-
   ly  available and  descriptions of national cleanup  programs.
   Improved access to data on domestic markets will help direct
   the development of new technology and strengthen U.S. ca-
   pabilities in environmental  cleanup.  As  companies  acquire
   field experience in this country, they will  be  better equipped
   to  compete  internationally.
   Specifications:  Prepared in cooperation  with Department of
   Defense,  Washington, DC.,  and Department of  Energy,
  Washington, DC. 173p.
  Subject    index   keywords:    Hazardous    materials,
  Wastes(lndustrial),  Sites,  Cleanup  time,   States(United
  States).

0133  Compendium of Good Ideas: Models of Success and
  Lessons Learned. Volume  1. Highlights
  Order Number PB93-963271CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Mar 93
  The entries  in Volume 1  illustrate measures  undertaken in
  each Regional office to improve implementation of the Su-
  perfund Program.
  Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing  Order, de-
  posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
  and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
  paper copy or microfiche. See also Volume 2, PB93-963272
  34p.
  Subject index keywords: Superfund, Program management,
  Improvement.
                                                                                                             23

-------
ADMINISTRATIVE & MANAGEMENT: Special Reports
0134  Compendium of Good Ideas: Models of Success and
  Lessons Learned. Volume 2. Source Book
  Order Number PB93-963272CDH, price: PC A05/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Mar 93
  The report Volume 2 of the Compendium of Good Ideas is
  designed to be a reference document for all personnel in-
  volved in the implementation of Superfund.  It contains nu-
  merous entries that provide the user with some information
  about specific initiatives or activities undertaken in various
  EPA Regional offices.
  Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
  posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
  and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
  paper copy or microfiche. See also Volume 1, PB93-963271.
  77p.
  Subject Index keywords: Superfund, Program management,
  Government employees, Improvement.
 0135  Ecosystem Effects of Superfund. National Priority
  List Sites In Industrial Landscapes: A Framework for
  Policy Decisions
  Order Number PB90-256728CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
  Georgia Univ., Athens. Inst. of Ecology.; Environmental
  Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of Cooperative
  Environmental Management; 1 Dec 89
  The report is part of the National Network for Environmental
  Management Studies under the auspices of the Office of Co-
  operative Environmental Management of the  U.S. Environ-
   mental Protection Agency. In order to comply with Superfund
   legislation for National  Priority List Sites having ecosystem
   effects that are located in industrial settings the study recom-
   mends different perspectives. A review of pertinent literature
   was conducted in order to develop a framework for EPA per-
   sonnel who are developing policy decisions in this  area. It is
   recommended  that a landscape perspective  be taken  in
   order to account for the cumulative, long term effects of the
   industrial setting. Such effects may be much more significant
   than the toxic waste site itself, and thus options such as cre-
   ation  or purchase  of additional  natural acreage elsewhere
   may make more ecological sense. The placing of the Super-
   fund effort in a landscape perspective requires a national,
   multiagency and interdisciplinary  landscape  management
   plan in order to be feasible. Regardless of the decision made
   in dealing with  these types of  NPL sites, a broadened ap-
   proach must be taken that considers long term economic  ef-
   fects, and the overall goal of society. Types of questions that
   need to be considered, as well as possible  approaches that
   can be used to  achieve these ends are given.
   Specifications:   Sponsored  by Environmental  Protection
   Agency, Washington, DC. Office of Cooperative Environmen-
   tal Management. 42p.
   Subject index  keywords: Hazardous materials, Site sur-
   veys, Industrial wastes, Superfund, Ecosystems, Toxic sub-
   stances.
  0136  Forum Focus, August 1993
   Order Number PB93-232684CDH, price: PC  A02/MF A01
   Environmental Protection Agency, Washington,  DC.
   Technology Innovation Office; Aug 93
   Contents: Workgroup Updates; Sampling Workshop; Techni-
    cal Support News; New Technical Forum;  OWPE Risk  As-
    sessment Policy; RD/RA Guidance Development; and Issue
    Paper Update.
  Specifications:  6p.
  Subject index keywords: Superfund,  Hazardous materials,
  Waste disposal, Newsletters.
0137  Guidance for Capacity Assurance Planning.
  Capacity Planning Pursuant to CERCLA Section 104(c)(9)
  Order Number PB93-209898CDH, price: PC A09/MF A02
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Solid Waste and Emergency Response; May 93
  The Guidance document advises states on how to assure
  adequate hazardous waste treatment and disposal capacity
  for  meeting  the  requirements of Section 104(c)(9) of  the
  Comprehensive   Environmental  Response,  Compensation,
  and Liability  Act  (CERCLA  or 'Superfund'), as amended, by
  preparing 1993 Hazardous Waste Capacity Assurance  Plans
  (CAPs)  It supersedes similar guidance documents issued in
  December 1988 and April  1991, and should  be used by
  states  for the 1993 Capacity  Assurance  Planning Process.
  The document includes an overview of the  Capacity Assur-
  ance Planning Process, baseyear data, projections,  and ad-
  dressing shortfalls.
  Specifications:  188p.
  Subject index  keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
  Hazardous materials, Capacity assurance plans.

 0138  Hazardous Waste Superfund Collection: Database
  Thesaurus
  Order Number PB91-131326CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Information Resources Management; Sep 90
  The Hazardous Waste  Superfund Collection Database The-
  saurus provides an index to terminology related to hazardous
  waste and facilitates the use of the  Hazardous Waste Super-
  fund Collection Database. The second edition of the Thesau-
   rus includes several new features. New keywords have been
   added  to ensure that  the  Thesaurus reflects current con-
   cerns  in the field of hazardous waste. The Thesaurus is di-
   vided  into two  parts: the Alphabetical List of Keywords and
   the List of Corporate Sources. The first part lists the Data-
   base  indexing  terms  alphabetically with an  accompanying
   definition. Beneath each term are found other terms that
   have been  classified as  'broader'  (BT),  'narrower' (NT),  or
   'related' (RT) to the listed keyword.  The List of Corporate
   Sources contains a complete list of names and acronyms for
   organizational sources currently indexed within the collection.
   The list will aid users in their search for documents prepared
   by EPA (Environmental Protection  Agency), offices or other
   government agencies. Also included in the edition is a 'Guide
   to the Major Subject Headings' which consists of nine major
   subject areas and their respective second tier terms.
   Specifications: 61 p.
   Subject index keywords: Thesauri, Hazardous materials,
   Terminology, Subject index terms, Superfund data base.

  0139  Index to the Monthly Hotline Report Questions
   (June 1982 to December 1991)
   Order Number PB92-131374CDH, price: PC A07/MF A02
   Booz-Allen and Hamilton, Inc., Bethesda, MD.; Environmental
   Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of Solid Waste
   and Emergency Response; Dec 92
   The document provides  four indices to the question  and
   answer sections of the RCRA/Superfund/Oust Monthly Hot-
   line Reports from  June 1982 through December 1991. The
  24

-------
                                                                    ADMINISTRATIVE & MANAGEMENT: Special
                                                                                                          Reports
  first index is an alphabetical listing of question titles by year
  and month.  The second index organizes  the questions by
  regulatory citation, beginning with 40  CFR  257.  The third
  index  organizes the questions by statuatory citation. Finally,
  the fourth index references the questions by key word or
  subject heading.
  Specifications:  See also  PB92-131242 and PB92-131390.
  Sponsored by Environmental Protection Agency, Washington,
  DC. Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response. 130p.
  Subject index keywords:  Information  management, Waste
  management, Regulations,  Indexes(Documentation),  Hotline
  Reports.

0140  Inside the Hotline: A Compilation of 1991  Monthly
  Hotline Reports
  Order Number PB92-131390CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
  Booz-Allen and Hamilton, Inc., Bethesda, MD.; Environmental
  Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office  of Solid Waste
  and Emergency Response; Mar 92
  The Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA)/Su-
  perfund (SF)/Office  of Underground Storage Tanks (OUST)
  and  Emergency  Planning  and  Community  Right-to-Know
  (EPCRA)  Hotlines were established to respond  to inquiries
  from the  regulated  community and  the  public  concerning
  waste management and disposal  regulations. The  Hotline
  also serves as a referral point on the availability and distribu-
  tion of program related documents and published  materials.
  The document is  a compilation  of questions and answers,
  Federal Register summaries from individual Monthly Hotline
  Reports for the period of January to December 1991. It also
  contains user-friendly indices which are arranged  according
  to subject matter,  regulatory and statory citations. The docu-
  ment can be used by its reader to explore  the application of
  the regulations in different scenarios or to shed light on com-
  plex issues. Neither the questions nor the FR summaries are
  intended to fully represent or be used in place of the regula-
  tions.  For  an understanding of the actual regulatory require-
  ments in any given situation, the reader must consult the ap-
  propriate sections of Title 40 of the Code of Federal Regula-
  tions, pertinent FR and EPA guidance documents, as well as
  relevant State regulations.
  Specifications:   Sponsored by Environmental  Protection
  Agency, Washington, DC. Office of Solid Waste and  Emer-
  gency Response. 72p.
  Subject index keywords:  Information  management, Waste
  management, Regulations.

0141  Inside the Hotline: A Compilation of  1992 Monthly
  Hotline Reports
  Order Number PB93-159572CDH, price: PC A05/MF A01
  Booz-Allen and Hamilton, Inc., Bethesda, MD.; Environmental
  Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of  Solid Waste
  and Emergency Response; Mar 93
  The document is  a  compilation  of questions and answers,
  Federal Register summaries from individual monthly Hotline
  reports for the period of January to  December  1992. It in-
  cludes indices arranged by subject, regulatory citation,  and
  statutory citation. The reader can use the  document to ex-
  plore the application of the  regulations to different  scenarios
  or to shed light on complex issues. Neither the  answers to
  questions nor the  Federal Register summaries are intended
  to fully represent or to be used in place of the  regulations.
  Specifications: See also PB92-131390. Sponsored by Envi-
  ronmental Protection  Agency,  Washington, DC.  Office of
  Solid Waste and Emergency Response. 90p.
  Subject! index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste man-
  agement, Regulations,  Waste disposal.

0142 NACEPT Committee Recommendations to
  Administrator Browner
  Order Number PB94-963211CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 4 Oct 93
  The subgroup was charged  with working on five distinct  but
  interrelated issues:  Community  Involvement/Empowerment;
  Non-Discriminatory Implementation  and Enforcement; Eco-
  nomic  Restoration/Security; Redevelopment  of  Cleanup
  Sites; and Community-wide  Environmental  Quality  Approach
  (Including synergistic effects of multiple source cleanup  ac-
  tivities and risk tradeoffs in remedy selection). The subgroup
  has prepared a set of  statements on each issue. The state-
  ments seek to reflect  the level of agreement and disagree-
  ment on each issue, as well  as present strong minority views
  where appropriate.
  Specifications: Paper  copy  available on Standing Order,  de-
  posit account required  (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
  and Mexico;  all  others  $400). Single copies also available in
  paper copy or microfiche. 42p.
  Subject index keywords: Superfund, Solid waste manage-
  ment, Hazardous materials.

0143 NACEPT Materials for  Meeting Held on September
  20-21, 1993
  Order Number PB94-963209CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Sep 93
  Many affected communities believe their needs are not being
  met by the Superfund (or other environmental) program. This
  is  particularly the  case for Environmental Justice communi-
  ties. In summary,  the following  issues have been raised  re-
  garding scope and established process of the Superfund pro-
  gram: current benefits are generally limited to human and  ec-
  ological health  improvements from site remediation; and  cu-
  mulative risk (from the site  and other sources) is  not often
  considered in risk assessment and remedy selection  at the
  site, which may particularly  affect minority and low income
  communities.
  Specifications: Paper  copy  available on Standing Order, de-
  posit account required  (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
  and Mexico;  all  others  $400). Single copies also available in
  paper copy or microfiche. 53p.
  Subject index keywords: Superfund, Solid waste manage-
  ment, Hazardous materials.
0144 NACEPT Meeting. Held in Crystal City, Virginia  on
  February 11, 1994
  Order Number PB94-963238CDH, price: PC A14/MF A03
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC.  Office  of
  Emergency and  Remedial Response; Feb 94
  The purpose of the  meeting is threefold: Bob Sussman and
  Elliott Laws will  give an overview of  the  Administration's Su-
  perfund bill;  EPA  is interested  in hearing  preliminary reac-
  tions to the bill's provisions; and EPA wants to discuss the
  role of this Committee during the next phase of Superfund
  reauthorization.  The following  document  are  included  for
                                                                                                                25

-------
ADMINISTRATIVE & MANAGEMENT: Special Reports
  review: The Administration's bill; The 'short' summary of the
  bill; The 'regular1 summary; Carol Browner's testimony before
  the Subcommittee on Transportation and Hazardous Materi-
  als; A vision statement which outlines the direction of the Ad-
  ministration's bill; The statement issued by Carol Browner at
  the press conference  held  February 3, 1994; A paper ex-
  plaining the  funding of environmental  insurance resolution
  reform; and A draft agenda for the meeting on February 11.
  Specifications: Paper  copy available on Standing Order, de-
  posit account required  (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
  and Mexico;  all others $400). Single copies also available in
  paper copy or microfiche. 301 p.
  Subject index  keywords: Superfund,  Pollution regulations,
  Meetings.

0145 National Oil and Hazardous Substances Pollution
  Contingency Plan (as Published in the Federal Register,
  March 8, 1990)
  Order Number PB90-160326CDH, price: PC A25/MF A03
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Emergency and Remedial Response; 1990
  The NCP is the major framework regulation for the  Federal
  hazardous substance response program. The NCP includes
  procedures and standards for how EPA, other Federal agen-
  cies, states and private parties respond under the Compre-
  hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
  ity Act (CERCLA) to releases  of hazardous substances and
  under the Clean Water Act to discharges of oil. These revi-
  sions  clarify  the 1985 NCP language,  reorganize the 1985
  NCP to describe more accurately the sequence of response
  actions, and incorporate  changes based on program  experi-
  ence since the 1985 revisions to the NCP.
  Specifications: 577p.
  Subject  index  keywords: Crude oil,  Hazardous  materials,
  Water pollution, National Contingency Plan, Oil spills.

0146 National Oil and Hazardous Substances Pollution
  Contingency Plan (The NCP)
  Order Number PB92-963261CDH, price: PC A15/MF A03
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Emergency and Remedial Response; Jan 92
  The report contains the  National Oil  and Hazardous Sub-
  stances Pollution Contingency Plan  proposed and final rules
  as published in 53 FR 51394 and 55 FR 8664, respectively.
  The NCP document also contains  tables of contents with
  specific Federal Register page references and a key terms
  index.
  Specifications: Available  on  Standing Order,  deposit ac-
  count required  (minimum deposit $200 U.S.,  Canada,  and
  Mexico;  all others $400). Single copies also  available  in
  paper copy or microfiche. 343p.
  Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Oil pollution,
  Pollution abatement, Emergencies, Superfund.

0147 National Priorities List Book Set
  Order Number PB91-238725CDH, price: PC$675.00
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Emergency and Remedial Response; 1991
  The report provides general Superfund background informa-
  tion and descriptions of activities at each State National Pri-
  orities List (NPL.) sites. The set of documents compiles State-
  Specific site summary fact sheets on each site being cleaned
  up under the Superfund program. The individual state sites
  are available as PB91-921207, and PB91-921209 thru PB91-
  921258.
  Specifications:   Set includes  PB91-921207 and PB91-
  921209 through PB91-921258. 4262p-in 51 v.
  Subject index keywords:  Hazardous  materials,  Pollution
  control, Superfund.

0148  National Priorities List Sites: Alabama
  Order Number PB91-921209CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01   ,
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 90
  Together with the companion National Overview volume this
  publication provides general Superfund background  informa-
  tion and descriptions of activities at each State National Pri-
  orities List (NPL) site. The document is intended to clearly
  describe what the problems are, what EPA and others  par-
  ticipating in site cleanups are doing, and how the Nation can
  move ahead  in solving these serious problems.  The State
  volume compiles site  summary fact  sheets  on each State
  site being cleaned up under the Superfund program.
  Specifications: Paper copy available  on Standing Order, de-
  posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada
  and Mexico;  all others $400). Single copies also available in
  paper copy or microfiche. 56p.
  Subject index keywords:  Hazardous  materials,  Pollution
  control, Alabama, Superfund, Cleanup.

0149  National Priorities List Sites: Alabama
  Order Number PB92-963223CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 91
  Together with the companion national overview volume the
  publication provides general Superfund background  informa-
  tion and descriptions of activities at each State National Pri-
  orities List (NPL) site.  The report clearly describes what the
  problems are, what  EPA  and others  participating in  site
  cleanups are doing, and  how the nation can  move ahead in
  solving these serious  problems. Also  included are sites sum-
  mary fact sheets on each State site being  cleaned up under
  the Superfund program.
  Specifications: Available on Standing  Order, deposit ac-
  count required (minimum deposit  $200 U.S., Canada,  and
  Mexico; all  others $400).  Single  copies  also available in
  paper copy or microfiche. Also available as a package con-
  taining 49 NPL Sites Volumes and 1 National  Overview
  Volume, PB92-963253. See also PB91-921209. 64p.
  Subject index keywords:  Hazardous  materials,  Pollution
  control,  Alabama, Superiund, National Priorities List, Clean-
  up.

0150 National Priorities List Sites: Alabama, 1992
  Order Number PB93-963201CDH, price:
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Solid Waste  and Emergency Response; Dec 92
  The publication provides general  Superfund  background in-
  formation and descriptions of activities at each State Nation-
  al Priorities List (NPL) site. It clearly describes what the prob-
  lems are, what EPA and others participating in site cleanups
  are doing, and how the nation can  move ahead in solving
  these serious  problems.  Compiles  site summary fact sheets
  on each State site being cleaned up under the Superfund
  Program. Other individual documents are also available as.
26

-------
                                                                      ADMINISTRATIVE & MANAGEMENT: Special
                                                                                                            Reports
   Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
   posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
   and Mexico;  all others $400). Single copies also available in
   paper copy or microfiche. Also  available as a package con-
   taining 49 NPL Sites, PB93-963250. 49 issues.
   Subject index keywords:  Hazardous materials,  Pollution
   control, Alabama, Superfund, National Priorities List, Clean-
   up.

 0151  National Priorities List Sites: Alaska
   Order Number PB91-921210CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
   Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
   Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 90
   Together with the companion National  Overview volume this
   publication provides general  Superfund background informa-
   tion and descriptions of activities at each State National Pri-
   orities List (NPL)  site. The document  is intended  to clearly
   describe what the problems  are, what EPA and others par-
   ticipating in site cleanups are doing, and how the Nation can
   move ahead  in solving  these serious  problems.  The State
   volume compiles  site summary fact sheets  on each State
   site being  cleaned up under the Superfund program.
   Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
   posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada
   and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
   paper copy or microfiche. 42p.
   Subject index keywords:  Hazardous materials, Pollution
   control, Alaska, Superfund, Cleanup.

 0152  National Priorities  List  Sites: Alaska
   Order Number PB92-963251CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
   Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC.  Office of
   Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 91
   Together with the companion national  overview volume the
   publication provides general  Superfund background informa-
   tion and descriptions of  activities at each State National Pri-
   orities List (NPL) site. The report clearly describes what the
   problems  are, what EPA and  others  participating  in site
   cleanups are  doing,  and how the nation can move ahead in
   solving these serious problems. Also included are sites sum-
   mary fact sheets on each State  site being cleaned up under
   the Superfund program.
   Specifications: Available  on Standing Order, deposit ac-
   count required (minimum deposit  $200 U.S., Canada, and
   Mexico; all others $400). Single  copies  also available  in
   paper copy or microfiche. Also available as a package  con-
  taining 49  NPL  Sites Volumes and 1 National  Overview
  Volume, PB92-963253. See also  PB91-921210, 53p.
  Subject index  keywords:  Hazardous materials,  Pollution
  control,  Alaska, Superfund, National  Priorities List, Cleanup.

0153   National Priorities List Sites: Alaska, 1992
  Order Number PB93-963202CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Dec 92
  The publication  provides general Superfund background in-
  formation and descriptions of activities at each State Nation-
  al Priorities List (NPL) site. It clearly describes  what the prob-
  lems are, what EPA  and others participating in site cleanups
  are doing,  and how the nation can move ahead  in solving
  these serious problems.  Compiles  site  summary fact sheets
  on each State site being cleaned up under the Superfund
  Program.
   Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
   posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
   and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
   paper copy or microfiche. Also  available as a package con-
   taining 49 NPL Sites, PB93-963250. 56p.
   Subject index  keywords:  Hazardous materials,  Pollution
   control, Alaska, Superfund, National Priorities List, Cleanup.

 0154  National Priorities List Sites: American Samoa,
   Guam, and the Trust Territories
   Order Number PB92-963242CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
   Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
   Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 91
   Together with  the companion national overview volume the
   publication provides general  Superfund background informa-
   tion and descriptions of activities at each State National Pri-
   orities List (NPL) site. The report clearly describes what the
   problems  are, what EPA and  others participating in site
   cleanups are doing, and how the nation can move ahead in
   solving these serious problems.  Also included are sites sum-
   mary fact  sheets on each State site  being cleaned up under
   the Superfund program.
   Specifications: Available  on Standing Order, deposit  ac-
   count required  (minimum  deposit $200 U.S., Canada, and
   Mexico; all others  $400). Single copies  also available  in
   paper copy or microfiche. Also available as a package con-
   taining 49 NPL Sites  Volumes and  1  National  Overview
   Volume, PB92-963253. See also PB91-921258. 49p.
   Subject index keywords:  Hazardous materials, Pollution
   control,  American Samoa,  Guam, Superfund,  National Prior-
   ities List, Cleanup.

0155  National Priorities List  Sites: American Samoa,
   Guam and Trust Territories
   Order Number PB91-921258CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
   Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
   Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 90
  Together with the companion National  Overview volume this
  publication provides general  Superfund background  informa-
  tion and descriptions of activities at each State National Pri-
  orities List (NPL) site. The document is intended to clearly
  describe what the problems  are, what  EPA and others par-
  ticipating in site cleanups are doing, and how the Nation can
  move ahead in solving these serious  problems.  The State
  volume  compiles site summary  fact sheets on each State
  site being cleaned up under the Superfund program.
  Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing  Order, de-
  posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada
  and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
  paper copy or microfiche. 36p.
  Subject index  keywords:  Hazardous materials, Pollution
  control, Guam and Trust Territories, Superfund, Cleanup.

0156   National Priorities List Sites: Arizona and Nevada
  Order Number PB91-921211CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 90
  Together with the companion National Overview volume this
  publication  provides  general Superfund background informa-
  tion and descriptions of activities at each State  National Pri-
  orities List  (NPL) site. The document is intended to clearly
  describe what the problems are, what  EPA and others par-
  ticipating in site cleanups are doing, and how the Nation can
                                                                                                                27

-------
ADMINISTRATIVE & MANAGEMENT: Special Reports
  move ahead  in solving these serious problems. The State
  volume  compiles  site  summary fact sheets on each State
  site being cleaned up under the Superfund program.
  Specifications: Paper  copy available on Standing Order, de-
  posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada
  and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
  paper copy or microfiche. 59p.
  Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials,  Pollution
  control,  Nevada, Superfund, Cleanup.

0157  National Priorities List Sites: Arizona and Nevada
  Order Number PB92-963216CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 91
  Together with the companion national overview volume the
  publication  provides general Superfund background informa-
  tion and descriptions of activities at each State National Pri-
  orities List (NPL) site.  The report clearly describes  what the
  problems are,  what EPA  and  others  participating  in site
  cleanups are  doing, and how the nation can move  ahead in
  solving these serious problems. Also included are sites sum-
  mary fact sheets on each State site being cleaned  up under
  the Superfund program.
  Specifications: Available  on Standing Order, deposit ac-
  count required (minimum deposit $200  U.S.,  Canada, and
  Mexico;  all others  $400).  Single copies also available in
  paper copy or microfiche. Also available as a package con-
  taining 49  NPL Sites Volumes  and   1  National Overview
  Volume, PB92-963253. See also PB91-921211. 69p.
  Subject Index keywords: Hazardous materials,  Pollution
  control,  Arizona, Nevada, Superfund, National  Priorities List,
  Cleanup.

0158  National Priorities List Sites: Arizona and Nevada,
  1992
  Order Number PB93-963204CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Dec 92
  The publication provides general Superfund background in-
  formation and descriptions  of activities at each State Nation-
  al Priorities List (NPL) site.  It clearly describes what the prob-
  lems are, what EPA and othersms. Compiles  site  summary
  fact sheets on each State site being  cleaned  up under the
  Superfund Program.
  Specifications: Paper  copy available on Standing Order, de-
  posit account required  (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
  and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
  paper copy or microfiche. Also available as a package con-
  taining 49 NPL Sites, PB93-963250. 74p.
  Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials,  Pollution
  control,  Arizona, Nevada, Superfund, National  Priorities List,
  Cleanup.

0159  National Priorities List Sites: Arkansas
  Order Number PB91-921212CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 90
  Together with the companion National  Overview volume this
  publication  provides general Superfund background informa-
  tion and descriptions of activities at each State National Pri-
  orities List  (NPL)  site.  The document is intended to clearly
  describe what the problems are, what EPA and others par-
  ticipating in site cleanups are doing, and how the Nation can
  move ahead  in solving these serious problems. The State
  volume compiles site summary  fact sheets on each  State
  site being cleaned up under the Superfund program.
  Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
  posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada
  and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
  paper copy or microfiche. 53p.
  Subject index keywords:  Hazardous  materials, Pollution
  control, Arkansas, Superfund, Cleanup.

0160  National Priorities List Sites: Arkansas
  Order Number PB92-963220CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 91
  Together with  the companion national overview volume the
  publication  provides general Superfund background informa-
  tion and descriptions of activities at each State National Pri-
  orities List (NPL) site. The report clearly describes what the
  problems are, what EPA  and  others  participating  in site
  cleanups are doing, and how the nation can move ahead in
  solving these serious problems. Also included  are sites sum-
  mary fact sheets on each State site being cleaned up under
  the Superfund program.
  Specifications: Available on Standing  Order,  deposit ac-
  count required  (minimum deposit  $200 U.S.,  Canada, and
  Mexico; all  others $400).  Single  copies also  available  in
  paper copy or microfiche. Also available as a package con-
  taining 49  NPL Sites  Volumes and  1 National  Overview
  Volume, PB92-963253. See also  PB91-921212. 63p.   •
  Subject index keywords:  Hazardous  materials, Pollution
  control, Arkansas, Superfund, National  Priorities List, Clean-
  up.

0161  National Priorities List Sites: Arkansas, 1992
  Order Number PB93-963205CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
  Environmental  Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Dec 92
  The publication provides general Superfund background in-
  formation and descriptions of activities at each State Nation-
  al Priorities List (NPL) site. It clearly describes what the prob-
  lems are, what EPA and others participating in site cleanups
  are doing, and how the nation can move ahead in solving
  these serious problems. Compiles  site summary fact sheets
  on each State site  being cleaned up under the Superfund
  Program.
  Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
  posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
  and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
  paper copy or microfiche. Also available as a package con-
  taining 49 NPL Sites, PB93-963250. 61 p.
  Subject index keywords:  Hazardous  materials, Pollution
  control, Arkansas, Superfund, National  Priorities List, Clean-
  up.

0162  National Priorities List Sites: California
  Order Number PB91-921213CDH, price: PC A10/MF A02
  Environmental.Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 90
  Together with the companion National Overview volume this
  publication  provides general Superfund background informa-
  tion and descriptions of activities at each State National Pri-
  orities List  (NPL) site. The document is intended  to clearly
  describe what the problems are, what EPA and others par-
  ticipating in site cleanups are doing, and how the Nation can
28

-------
                                                                     ADMINISTRATIVE & MANAGEMENT: Special
                                                                                                            Reports
  move ahead  in solving these serious problems.  The State
  volume  compiles  site summary fact sheets on each State
  site being cleaned up under the Superfund program.
  Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing  Order, de-
  posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada
  and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
  paper copy or microfiche. 222p.
  Subject  index keywords: Hazardous materials, Pollution
  control, California, Superfund, Cleanup.

0163 National Priorities List Sites: California and Hawaii
  Order Number PB92-963239CDH, price: PC A11/MF A03
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 91
  Together with the companion national overview volume the
  publication  provides general Superfund background informa-
  tion and descriptions of activities at each State National Pri-
  orities List  (NPL) site. The report clearly  describes what the
  problems are, what EPA  and  others participating  in site
  cleanups are  doing, and how the nation can move ahead in
  solving these serious problems. Also included are  sites sum-
  mary fact sheets on each State site being cleaned up under
  the Superfund program.
  Specifications: Available  on Standing Order, deposit  ac-
  count required  (minimum deposit $200  U.S.,  Canada, and
  Mexico;  all others  $400).  Single copies also available in
  paper copy or microfiche. Also available  as a package con-
  taining 49  NPL Sites Volumes  and   1  National Overview
  Volume, PB92-963253. See also PB91-921213. 232p.
  Subject  index keywords: Hazardous materials, Pollution
  control, California, Hawaii, Superfund,  National  Priorities List,
  Cleanup.

0164 National Priorities List Sites: California and Hawaii,
  1992
  Order Number PB93-963206CDH, price: PC A12/MF A03
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Dec 92
  The publication provides general Superfund background in-
  formation and descriptions  of activities at each State Nation-
  al  Priorities  List (NPL) site.  It clearly describes what the prob-
  lems are, what EPA and others participating in site cleanups
  are doing, and how the nation can move ahead  in solving
  these serious problems. Compiles site summary fact sheets
  on each  State site  being cleaned up under the  Superfund
  Program.
  Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing  Order, de-
  posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
  and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
  paper copy or microfiche. Also available  as a package con-
  taining 49 NPL Sites, PB93-963250. 261 p.
  Subject  index keywords: Hazardous materials,  Pollution
  control, California, Hawaii, Superfund,  National  Priorities List,
  Cleanup.

0165 National Priorities List Sites: Colorado
  Order Number PB91-921214CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Emergency  and Remedial Response; Sep 90
  Together with the companion National  Overview volume this
  publication  provides general Superfund background informa-
  tion and descriptions of activities at each State National Pri-
  orities List  (NPL) site. The document is  intended to clearly
  describe what the problems are, what EPA and others par-
  ticipating in site cleanups are doing, and how the Nation can
  move ahead  in solving  these serious problems. The State
  volume  compiles  site summary fact sheets on each State
  site being cleaned up under the Superfund program.
  Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
  posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada
  and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
  paper copy or microfiche. 70p.
  Subject:  index keywords: Hazardous materials,  Pollution
  control, Colorado,  Superfund, Cleanup.

0166  National Priorities List Sites: Colorado
  Order Number PB92-963237CDH, price: PC A05/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 91
  Together with  the companion national overview volume the
  publication  provides general Superfund background informa-
  tion and descriptions of activities  at each State National Pri-
  orities List (NPL) site. The report clearly  describes what the
  problems are, what EPA  and others participating  in site
  cleanups are  doing, and how the nation can move ahead in
  solving these serious problems. Also included are sites sum-
  mary fact sheets on each State site being cleaned up under
  the Superfund program.
  Specifications: Available  on Standing Order, deposit ac-
  count required  (minimum deposit $200  U.S.,  Canada, and
  Mexico;  all others  $400).  Single copies also available  in
  paper copy or microfiche. Also available  as a package  con-
  taining 49  NPL Sites Volumes  and   1  National Overview
  Volume, PB92-963253. See also PB91-921214. 79p.
  Subject  index keywords: Hazardous materials,  Pollution
  control,  Colorado, Superfund,  National Priorities List, Clean-
  up.
0167  National Priorities List Sites: Colorado, 1992
  Order Number PB93-963207CDH, price: PC A05/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Dec 92
  The publication provides general  Superfund background in-
  formation and descriptions  of activities  at each State Nation-
  al Priorities  List (NPL) site.  It clearly describes what the prob-
  lems are, what EPA and others participating in site cleanups
  are doing, and how the nation can move ahead  in solving
  these serious problems.  Compiles site summary fact sheets
  on each State site  being  cleaned up  under the Superfund
  Program.
  Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
  posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
  and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
  paper copy or microfiche. Also available  as a package  con-
  taining 49 NPL Sites, PB93-963250. 88p.
  Subject  index keywords: Hazardous materials,  Pollution
  control,  Colorado, Superfund,  National Priorities List, Clean-
  up.
0168  National Priorities List Sites: Connecticut
  Order Number PB91-921215CDH,  price: PC A04/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency,  Washington, DC. Office of
  Emergency  and Remedial Response; Sep 90
  Together with the  companion National  Overview volume this
  publication provides general Superfund background informa-
  tion and descriptions of activities at each State National Pri-
  orities List (NPL) site. The document is  intended to clearly
                                                                                                                 29

-------
ADMINISTRATIVE & MANAGEMENT: Special Reports
  describe what the problems are, what EPA and others par-
  ticipating in site cleanups are doing, and how the Nation can
  move ahead in solving  these  serious problems.  The State
  volume compiles  site summary fact  sheets  on each State
  site being cleaned up under the Superfund program.
  Specifications: Paper copy available  on Standing Order, de-
  posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada
  and  Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
  paper copy or microfiche. 59p.
  Subject index keywords:  Hazardous materials, Pollution
  control, Connecticut, Superfund, Cleanup.
0169  National Priorities  List Sites: Connecticut
  Order Number PB92-963203CDH, price:
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 91
  Together with the companion national overview volume the
  publication provides general Superfund background informa-
  tion  and descriptions of  activities at each State National Pri-
  orities  List (NPL)  site. The report clearly describes what the
  problems  are, what  EPA and others participating  in site
  cleanups are doing, and how the nation can  move ahead in
  solving these serious problems. Also included are sites sum-
  mary fact sheets on each State site being cleaned up under
  the Superfund program.
  Specifications: Available  on  Standing Order, deposit  ac-
  count required  (minimum deposit $200  U.S., Canada, and
  Mexico; all  others $400). Single copies also available in
  paper copy or microfiche. Also available as a package con-
  taining  49 NPL Sites Volumes and  1  National Overview
  Volume, PB92-963253. See also PB91-921215. 49 issues.
  Subject  Index keywords:  Hazardous materials, Pollution
  control,  Connecticut,  Superfund,  National  Priorities  List,
  Cleanup.
0170  National Priorities  List Sites: Connecticut, 1992
  Order Number PB93-963208CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Dec 92
  The  publication provides general Superfund background in-
  formation and descriptions of activities at each State Nation-
  al Priorities List (NPL) site. It clearly describes what the prob-
  lems are, what EPA and others participating in site cleanups
  are doing, and  how the nation can move  ahead in solving
  these serious problems.  Compiles site summary fact sheets
  on each State site being cleaned up under the  Superfund
  Program.
  Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing  Order, de-
  posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
  and  Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
  paper copy or microfiche. Also available as a package con-
  taining 49 NPL Sites, PB93-963250. 73p.
  Subject  index keywords:  Hazardous materials, Pollution
  control, Connecticut,  Superfund, National  Priorities  List,
  Cleanup.
0171  National Priorities  List Sites: Delaware
  Order Number PB91-921216CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 90
  Together with the companion National Overview volume this
  publication provides general  Superfund background informa-
  tion and descriptions of activities at each State National Pri-
  orities List (NPL)  site. The document is intended to clearly
  describe what the problems are, what EPA and  others par-
  ticipating in site cleanups are doing, and how the Nation can
  move ahead  in solving  these serious problems. The State
  volume  compiles site  summary fact sheets on  each State
  site being cleaned up under the Superfund program.
  Specifications: Paper  copy available on Standing Order, de-
  posit account required (minimum deposit $200  U.S., Canada
  and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also  available in
  paper copy or microfiche. 75p.
  Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials,  Pollution
  control,  Delaware, Superfund, Cleanup.

0172 National Priorities List Sites: Delaware
  Order Number PB92-963228CDH, price: PC A05/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 91
  Together with  the companion national overview volume the
  publication  provides general Superfund background informa-
  tion and descriptions of activities at each State National Pri-
  orities List (NPL) site.  The  report clearly  describes  what the
  problems are, what EPA  and others participating  in site
  cleanups are  doing, and how the nation can move  ahead in
  solving these serious problems. Also included are sites sum-
  mary fact sheets on each State site being cleaned  up under
  the Superfund program.
  Specifications: Available  on Standing Order,  deposit ac-
  count required  (minimum deposit  $200  U.S., Canada, and
  Mexico;  all others  $400).  Single  copies also  available  in
  paper copy or microfiche. Also available  as a package con-
  taining 49  NPL Sites  Volumes and  1  National Overview
  Volume, PB92-963253. See also PB91-921216. 82p.
  Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials,  Pollution
  control,  Delaware, Superfund, National Priorities List, Clean-
  up.

0173 National Priorities List Sites: Delaware, 1992
  Order Number PB93-963209CDH, price: PC A05/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Dec 92
  The publication provides general Superfund background in-
  formation and descriptions of activities at each State Nation-
  al  Priorities  List (NPL) site. It clearly describes what the prob-
  lems are, what EPA and others participating in site  cleanups
  are doing, and  how the nation can move ahead in solving
  these  serious problems.  Compiles  site summary fact sheets
  on each State site  being cleaned up  under the Superfund
  Program.
  Specifications: Paper  copy available on Standing Order, de-
  posit account required  (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
  and Mexico; all others  $400). Single copies  also available in
  paper copy or microfiche. Also available  as a package con-
  taining 49 NPL Sites, PB93-963250. 90p.
  Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials,  Pollution
  control,  Delaware, Superfund,  National Priorities List, Clean-
  up.

0174 National Priorities List Sites: Florida
  Order Number PB91-921217CDH, price: PC A07/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Emergency  and Remedial Response; Sep 90
  Together with the companion National Overview volume this
  publication provides general Superfund background informa-
  tion and descriptions of activities at each State National Pri-
30

-------
                                                                     ADMINISTRATIVE & MANAGEMENT: Special
                                                                                                           Reports
  orities List (NPL) site. The document is  intended to clearly
  describe what the problems are,  what EPA and others par-
  ticipating in site cleanups are doing, and how the Nation can
  move ahead  in solving these serious problems. The State
  volume compiles site  summary fact sheets on  each State
  site being cleaned up under the Superfund program.
  Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
  posit account required (minimum deposit  $200 U.S., Canada
  and Mexico; all  others $400). Single copies also available in
  paper copy or microfiche. 147p.
  Subject index  keywords: Hazardous materials,  Pollution
  control, Florida,  Superfund, Cleanup.

0175  National Priorities List Sites: Florida
  Order Number PB92-963250CDH,  price: PC A08/MF A02
  Environmental Protection Agency,  Washington, DC. Office of
  Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 91
  Together with the companion national overview volume the
  publication provides general Superfund background  informa-
  tion and descriptions of activities  at each State National Pri-
  orities List (NPL) site.  The report  clearly  describes what the
  problems are, what EPA  and others participating  in site
  cleanups are  doing, and how the  nation can move ahead in
  solving these serious problems. Also included are sites sum-
  mary fact sheets on each State site being cleaned  up under
  the Superfund program.
  Specifications: Available  on Standing Order, deposit  ac-
  count required  (minimum deposit $200  U.S.,  Canada, and
  Mexico;  all others  $400). Single copies also available  in
  paper copy or microfiche. Also available  as a package  con-
  taining 49  NPL Sites  Volumes  and  1  National Overview
  Volume, PB92-963253. See also PB91-921217. 152p.
  Subject index  keywords: Hazardous materials,  Pollution
  control, Florida, Superfund, National Priorities List,  Cleanup.

0176  National Priorities List Sites: Florida, 1992
  Order Number PB93-963210CDH,  price: PC A08/MF A02
  Environmental Protection Agency,  Washington, DC. Office of
  Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Dec 92
  The publication provides general  Superfund background in-
  formation and descriptions of activities at each State Nation-
  al Priorities List (NPL) site. It clearly describes what the prob-
  lems are, what EPA and others participating in site  cleanups
  are doing, and  how the nation can move ahead in solving
  these serious problems. Compiles site summary fact sheets
  on each State site  being cleaned up under the Superfund
  Program.
  Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
  posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S.,  Canada,
  and Mexico; all  others $400). Single copies also available in
  paper copy or microfiche. Also available  as a package  con-
  taining 49 NPL Sites, PB93-963250. 168p.
  Subject index  keywords: Hazardous materials,  Pollution
  control, Florida, Superfund, National Priorities List,  Cleanup.
0177  National Priorities List Sites: Georgia
  Order Number PB91-921218CDH,  price: PC A04/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency,  Washington, DC. Office of
  Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 90
  Together with the companion National Overview volume this
  publication provides general Superfund background  informa-
  tion and descriptions of activities  at each State National Pri-
  orities List (NPL) site. The document is  intended to clearly
  describe what the problems are,  what EPA and others par-
  ticipating in site cleanups are doing, and how the Nation can
  move ahead  in solving  these serious problems. The State
  volume  compiles site  summary  fact sheets on each State
  site being cleaned up under the Superfund program.
  Specifications: Paper  copy available on Standing Order, de-
  posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada
  and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
  paper copy or microfiche. 59p.
  Subject  index keywords: Hazardous materials,  Pollution
  control,  Georgia, Superfund, Cleanup.

0178  National Priorities List Sites: Georgia
  Order Number PB92-963226CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 91
  Together with the companion national overview volume the
  publication  provides general Superfund background informa-
  tion and descriptions of activities at each State National Pri-
  orities List (NPL) site.  The  report clearly describes what the
  problems are, what EPA  and  others  participating  in site
  cleanups are  doing, and how the nation can move ahead in
  solving these serious problems. Also included are sites  sum-
  mary fact sheets on each State site being cleaned up under
  the Superfund program.
  Specifications: Available  on Standing Order, deposit ac-
  count required  (minimum deposit $200  U.S.,  Canada, and
  Mexico;  all others  $400).  Single copies also available in
  paper copy or microfiche. Also available as  a package  con-
  taining 49  NPL Sites  Volumes  and   1  National Overview
  Volume, PB92-963253. See also  PB91-921218. 68p.
  Subject  index keywords: Hazardous materials,  Pollution
  control,  Georgia, Superfund, National Priorities  List, Cleanup.

0179  National Priorities List Sites: Georgia, 1992
  Order Number PB93-963211CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Dec 92
  The publication provides general Superfund background in-
  formation and descriptions of activities at each State Nation-
  al Priorities  List (NPL) site. It clearly describes what the prob-
  lems are, what EPA and others participating  in site cleanups
  are  doing, and how the nation can move ahead  in solving
  these serious problems. Compiles site summary fact sheets
  on each State site  being cleaned up under the Superfund
  Program.
  Specifications: Paper  copy available on Standing Order, de-
  posit account required  (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
  and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
'. paper copy or microfiche. Also available as  a package  con-
  taining 49 NPL Sites, PB93-963250. 70p.
  Subject  index keywords: Hazardous materials,  Pollution
  control,  Georgia, Superfund, National Priorities  List, Cleanup.

0180  National Priorities List Sites: Hawaii
  Order Number PB91-921219CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 90
  Together with the companion National Overview volume this
  publication  provides general Superfund background informa-
  tion and descriptions of activities at each State National Pri-
  orities List  (NPL) site.  The document is intended to clearly
  describe what the problems are, what EPA  and others par-
  ticipating in site cleanups are doing, and how the Nation can
                                                                                                                 31

-------
 ADMINISTRATIVE & MANAGEMENT: Special Reports
   move ahead in  solving these serious problems. The State
   volume compiles site summary fact sheets  on each State
   site being cleaned up under the Superfund program.
   Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
   posit account required  (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada
   and Mexico; all others  $400). Single copies also available in
   paper copy or microfiche. 43p.
   Subject index  keywords:  Hazardous materials, Pollution
   control, Hawaii, Superfund, Cleanup.

0181  National Priorities List Sites: Idaho
   Order Number PB91-921220CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
   Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
   Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 90
   Together with the companion National Overview volume this
   publication provides general Superfund background informa-
   tion and descriptions of activities at each State National Pri-
   orities  List (NPL) site.  The document is  intended  to clearly
   describe what the problems are, what EPA and others par-
   ticipating in site cleanups are doing, and how the Nation can
   move ahead in  solving these serious problems. The State
   volume compiles site summary fact  sheets  on each State
   site being  cleaned up under the Superfund program.
   Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
   posit account required  (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada
   and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
   paper copy or microfiche. 50p.
   Subject index  keywords:  Hazardous materials, Pollution
   control, Idaho, Superfund, Cleanup.

0182  National Priorities List Sites: Idaho
   Order Number PB92-963219CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
   Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
   Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 91
   Together with the companion national overview volume the
   publication provides general Superfund background informa-
   tion and descriptions of activities at each State National Pri-
   orities List (NPL) site. The report clearly describes what the
   problems  are, what EPA and others participating  in  site
   cleanups are doing, and how the nation can  move ahead in
   solving these serious problems. Also included are sites sum-
   mary fact  sheets on each State site being cleaned up under
   the Superfund program.
   Specifications:  Available  on  Standing Order,  deposit ac-
   count required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada, and
   Mexico; all  others  $400).  Single copies  also available in
   paper copy or microfiche. Also available as a package con-
   taining  49 NPL  Sites  Volumes  and  1  National  Overview
  Volume, PB92-963253. See also PB91-921220. 60p.
   Subject index keywords:  Hazardous materials, Pollution
   control, Idaho, Superfund, National Priorities List, Cleanup.
0183 National Priorities List Sites: Idaho, 1992
   Order Number PB93-963212CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
   Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Solid Waste and  Emergency Response; Dec 92
  The publication provides general Superfund background in-
   formation and descriptions of activities at each State Nation-
   al Priorities List (NPL) site. It clearly describes what the prob-
   lems are, what EPA and others participating in site cleanups
  are doing, and how the nation can move  ahead in solving
  these serious problems. Compiles site summary fact sheets
  on each State site  being cleaned up under  the Superfund
   Program.
  Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
  posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
  and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
  paper copy or microfiche. Also available as a package con-
  taining 49 NPL Sites, PB93-963250. 62p.
  Subject  index keywords: Hazardous materials,  Pollution
  control, Idaho, Superfund, National Priorities List, Cleanup.

0184 National Priorities List Sites: Illinois
  Order Number PB91-921221CDH, price: PC A06/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 90
  Together with the companion National  Overview volume this
  publication provides general Superfund background informa-
  tion and descriptions of activities at each State  National Pri-
  orities  List (NPL)  site. The  document is intended to  clearly
  describe what the problems are, what EPA and others par-
  ticipating in site cleanups are doing, and how the Nation can
  move ahead  in solving these serious  problems. The State
  volume compiles  site  summary  fact sheets on  each State
  site being  cleaned up under the Superfund  program.
  Specifications: Paper  copy available on Standing Order, de-
  posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada
  and Mexico; all  others $400). Single copies also available in
  paper copy or microfiche. 111 p.
  Subject index  keywords: Hazardous materials,  Pollution
  control, Illinois, Superfund, Cleanup.

0185 National Priorities List Sites: Illinois
  Order Number PB92-963248CDH, price: PC A06/MF A02
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 91
  Together with the companion  national  overview volume the
  publication provides general Superfund background informa-
  tion and descriptions of activities at each State  National Pri-
  orities  List (NPL) site.  The report clearly describes what the
  problems  are, what EPA and  others participating  in site
  cleanups are doing, and how the nation can move ahead in
  solving these serious problems. Also included are sites sum-
  mary fact  sheets on each State site being  cleaned up under
  the Superfund program.
  Specifications: Available on  Standing Order,  deposit ac-
  count required  (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada, and
  Mexico; all others  $400). Single copies  also  available  in
  paper copy or microfiche. Also available as a package  con-
  taining 49 NPL Sites Volumes  and   1 National Overview
  Volume, PB92-963253. See also PB91 -921221. 117p.
  Subject index  keywords: Hazardous materials,  Pollution
  control, Illinois, Superfund, National Priorities List, Cleanup.

0186 National Priorities List Sites: Illinois, 1992
  Order Number PB93-963213CDH, price: PC A06/MF A02
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Dec 92
  The publication  provides general Superfund background in-
  formation and descriptions of activities at each State Nation-
  al  Priorities List (NPL) site. It clearly describes what the prob-
  lems are, what EPA and others participating in site cleanups
  are doing, and  how the nation can move ahead in solving
  these  serious problems. Compiles site  summary fact  sheets
  on each State site  being cleaned up  under the Superfund
  Program.
32

-------
                                                                     ADMINISTRATIVE & MANAGEMENT: Special
                                                                                                           Reports
  Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
  posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
  and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
  paper copy or microfiche. Also available as a package con-
  taining 49 NPL Sites, PB93-963250. 120p.
  Subject  index keywords: Hazardous materials,  Pollution
  control, Illinois, Superfund, National Priorities List, Cleanup.
0187  National Priorities List Sites: Indiana
  Order Number PB91-921222CDH, price: PC A06/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 90
  Together with the companion National  Overview volume this
  publication  provides general Superfund background informa-
  tion and descriptions of activities at each State  National Pri-
  orities List  (NPL)  site. The document is intended to  clearly
  describe  what the problems are, what EPA and others par-
  ticipating  in site cleanups are doing, and how the Nation can
  move ahead  in solving these serious  problems. The State
  volume compiles  site  summary fact sheets on  each State
  site being cleaned up under the Superfund  program.
  Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
  posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada
  and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
  paper copy or microfiche. 108p.
  Subject  index keywords: Hazardous materials,  Pollution
  control, Indiana, Superfund, Cleanup.
0188  National Priorities List Sites: Indiana
  Order Number PB92-963249CDH, price: PC A06/MF A02
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 91
  Together with  the companion national  overview volume the
  publication  provides general Superfund background informa-
  tion and descriptions of activities at each State  National Pri-
  orities List (NPL) site.  The  report clearly describes  what the
  problems are, what  EPA  and  others participating  in site
  cleanups are doing, and how the nation can move  ahead in
  solving these serious problems. Also included are sites sum-
  mary fact sheets on each State site being  cleaned  up under
  the Superfund program.
  Specifications: Available  on Standing Order,  deposit ac-
  count required  (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada, and
  Mexico;  all  others $400).  Single copies  also  available in
  paper copy or microfiche. Also available as a package con-
  taining 49  NPL Sites  Volumes  and   1 National Overview
  Volume, PB92-963253. See also PB91-921222. 113p.
  Subject  index keywords: Hazardous materials,  Pollution
  control, Indiana, Superfund, National Priorities List,  Cleanup.
0189  National Priorities List Sites: Indiana, 1992
  Order Number PB93-963214CDH, price: PC A06/MF A02
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Dec 92
  The publication provides general Superfund background in-
  formation and descriptions of activities  at each State Nation-
  al Priorities List (NPL) site. It clearly describes what the prob-
  lems are, what EPA and others participating in site  cleanups
  are  doing, and how the nation can move ahead in solving
  these serious "problems. Compiles site  summary fact  sheets
  on each  State site being cleaned up  under the Superfund
  Program.
  Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
  posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
  and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
  paper copy or microfiche. Also available as a package con-
  taining 49 NPL Sites, PB93-963250. 120p.
  Subject  index keywords: Hazardous materials,  Pollution
  control, Indiana, Superfund, National Priorities List, Cleanup.

0190  National Priorities List Sites: Iowa
  Order Number PB91-921223CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 90
  Together with the companion National  Overview volume this
  publication  provides general Superfund  background informa-
  tion and descriptions of activities at each State  National Pri-
  orities List  (NPL)  site. The  document is intended to clearly
  describe what the problems are, what EPA and others par-
  ticipating  in site cleanups are doing, and how the Nation can
  move ahead  in solving these serious  problems. The State
  volume compiles  site  summary fact sheets on each State
  site being cleaned up under the Superfund program.
  Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
  posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada
  and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
  paper copy or microfiche. 75p.
  Subject  index keywords: Hazardous materials,  Pollution
  control, Iowa, Superfund, Cleanup.

0191  National Priorities List Sites: Iowa
  Order Number PB92-963234CDH, price: PC A05/MF A02
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 91
  Together with  the companion national  overview volume the
  publication  provides general Superfund  background informa-
  tion and descriptions of activities at each State  National Pri-
  orities List (NPL) site.  The report clearly describes what the
  problems are, what  EPA and  others  participating  in site
  cleanups are doing, and how the nation can move ahead in
  solving these serious problems. Also included are sites sum-
  mary fact sheets on each State site being cleaned up under
  the Superfund program.
  Specifications: Available  on Standing Order,  deposit ac-
  count required  (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada, and
  Mexico; all others $400). Single copies  also  available  in
  paper copy or microfiche. Also available as a package con-
  taining 49  NPL Sites  Volumes and   1  National Overview
  Volume, PB92-963253. See also PB91-921223. 80p.
  Subject  index keywords: Hazardous materials,  Pollution
  control, Iowa, Superfund, National Priorities List, Cleanup.
0192  National Priorities List Sites: Iowa, 1992
  Order Number PB93-963215CDH, price: PC A05/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Dec 92
  The publication provides general Superfund background in-
  formation and descriptions of activities  at each State Nation-
  al Priorities List (NPL) site. It clearly describes what the prob-
  lems are, what EPA and others  participating in site cleanups
  are doing, and how the nation  can move ahead  in solving
  these serious problems. Compiles site  summary fact sheets
  on each  State site being cleaned  up  under the Superfund
  Program.
  Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
  posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
  and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
                                                                                                                 33

-------
ADMINISTRATIVE & MANAGEMENT: Special Reports
  paper copy or microfiche. Also available as a package con-
  taining 49 NPL Sites, PB93-963250. 78p.
  Subject  index keywords:  Hazardous materials, Pollution
  control, Iowa, Superfund, National Priorities List, Cleanup.

0193  National Priorities List Sites: Kansas
  Order Number PB91-921224CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 90
  Together with the companion National Overview volume this
  publication provides general  Superfund background informa-
  tion and descriptions of activities at each State National Pri-
  orities  List (NPL)  site. The  document is intended to clearly
  describe what the problems are, what EPA and  others par-
  ticipating in site cleanups are doing, and how the Nation can
  move ahead  in solving these serious problems.  The State
  volume compiles  site summary fact  sheets  on  each State
  site being  cleaned up under the Superfund program.
  Specifications: Paper copy available  on Standing Order, de-
  posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada
  and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also  available in
  paper copy or microfiche. 53p.
  Subject index keywords:  Hazardous materials, Pollution
  control, Kansas, Superfund, Cleanup.

0194  National Priorities List Sites: Kansas
  Order Number PB92-963213CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 91
  Together with  the companion national overview volume the
  publication provides general  Superfund background informa-
  tion and descriptions of activities at each State National Pri-
  orities List (NPL) site. The report clearly describes what the
  problems  are, what EPA and  others participating  in site
  cleanups are doing, and how the nation can  move ahead in
  solving these serious problems. Also included are sites sum-
  mary fact  sheets on each State  site being cleaned up under
  the Superfund program.
  Specifications: Available on Standing Order, deposit ac-
  count required  (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada, and
  Mexico; all others  $400). Single copies also available in
  paper copy or microfiche. Also available as a package con-
  taining 49 NPL Sites  Volumes  and  1  National Overview
  Volume, PB92-963253. See also PB91-921224. 64p.
  Subject index keywords:  Hazardous materials, Pollution
  control, Kansas, Superfund, National Priorities List, Cleanup.
0195  National Priorities List Sites: Kansas, 1992
  Order Number PB93-963216CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
  Environmental  Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Dec 92
  The publication provides general Superfund  background in-
  formation and descriptions of activities at each State Nation-
  al  Priorities List (NPL) site. It clearly describes what the prob-
  lems are, what EPA and others participating in site cleanups
  are doing, and how the nation  can  move  ahead in solving
  these serious problems. Compiles site summary fact sheets
  on each State site  being cleaned up under the  Superfund
  Program.
  Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
  posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
  and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
  paper copy or microfiche. Also available as a package con-
  taining 49  NPL Sites, PB93-963250. 59p.
  Subject  index keywords: Hazardous  materials,  Pollution
  control,  Kansas, Superfund, National Priorities List,  Cleanup.

0196   National Priorities List Sites: Kentucky
  Order Number PB91-921225CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 90
  Together with the companion National Overview volume this
  publication  provides general Superfund background informa-
  tion and descriptions of activities at each State National Pri-
  orities List  (NPL)  site.  The document is  intended to  clearly
  describe what the problems are, what EPA and others par-
  ticipating in site cleanups are doing, and how the Nation can
  move ahead  in solving these serious problems. The State
  volume  compiles  site  summary  fact sheets on each State
  site being cleaned up under the Superfund program.
  Specifications: Paper  copy available on Standing Order, de-
  posit account required  (minimum deposit  $200 U.S., Canada
  and Mexico; all others  $400). Single copies also available in
  paper copy or microfiche. 66p.
  Subject  index keywords: Hazardous  materials,  Pollution
  control, Kentucky, Superfund, Cleanup.

0197   National Priorities List Sites: Kentucky
  Order Number PB92-963227CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 91
  Together with  the companion national overview volume the
  publication  provides general Superfund background informa-
  tion and descriptions of activities at each State National Pri-
  orities List (NPL) site.  The  report clearly  describes  what the
  problems are, what EPA  and  others participating  in site
  cleanups are doing, and how the nation can move  ahead in
  solving these serious problems. Also included are sites sum-
  mary fact sheets on each State site being cleaned  up under
  the Superfund program.
  Specifications: Available  on Standing  Order,  deposit ac-
  count required (minimum deposit $200  U.S., Canada, and
  Mexico;  all others  $400).  Single copies also  available  in
  paper copy or microfiche. Also available  as a package con-
  taining 49  NPL  Sites Volumes  and 1  National Overview
  Volume, PB92-963253. See also  PB91-921225. 75p.
  Subject  index keywords: Hazardous  materials,  Pollution
  control,  Kentucky, Superfund,  National Priorities List,  Clean-
  up.

0198   National Priorities List Sites: Kentucky, 1992
  Order Number PB93-963217CDH, price: PC A05/MF A01
  Environmental  Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Dec 92
  The  publication provides general Superfund background in-
  formation and descriptions of activities at each State Nation-
  al Priorities  List (NPL) site. It clearly describes what the prob-
  lems are, what EPA and others participating in site  cleanups
  are  doing, and how the nation can  move ahead in solving
  these serious problems.  Compiles site summary fact  sheets
  on each  State site  being cleaned up under the Superfund
  Program.
  Specifications: Paper  copy available on Standing Order, de-
  posit account required  (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
  and Mexico; all others  $400). Single copies also available in
  paper copy or microfiche. Also available  as a package con-
  taining 49 NPL Sites, PB93-963250. 82p.
34

-------
                                                                     ADMINISTRATIVE & MANAGEMENT: Special
                                                                                                           Reports
  Subject  index keywords: Hazardous materials, Pollution
  control,  Kentucky, Superfund,  National Priorities List, Clean-
  up.

0199 National Priorities List Sites: Louisiana
  Order Number PB91-921226CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 90
  Together with the companion National Overview volume this
  publication  provides general Superfund background informa-
  tion and descriptions of activities at each State National Pri-
  orities List  (NPL)  site. The  document is  intended to clearly
  describe  what the problems are, what EPA and others par-
  ticipating in site cleanups are doing, and how the Nation can
  move ahead  in solving these serious problems.  The State
  volume compiles  site summary  fact sheets on each State
  site being cleaned up under the Superfund program.
  Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing  Order, de-
  posit account required (minimum deposit  $200 U.S., Canada
  and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
  paper copy or microfiche.  53p.
  Subject  index keywords: Hazardous materials, Pollution
  control, Louisiana, Superfund, Cleanup.
0200 National Priorities List Sites: Louisiana
  Order Number PB92-963222CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 91
  Together with  the companion  national overview volume the
  publication  provides general Superfund background informa-
  tion and descriptions of activities at each State National Pri-
  orities List (NPL) site. The report clearly  describes what the
  problems are, what EPA and  others participating  in site
  cleanups are  doing, and how the nation can move ahead in
  solving these serious problems. Also included are  sites sum-
  mary fact sheets on each State  site being cleaned up under
  the Superfund program.
  Specifications: Available on  Standing Order,  deposit ac-
  count required  (minimum deposit $200  U.S., Canada, and
  Mexico;  all others  $400). Single copies also  available  in
  paper copy or microfiche. Also available  as a package  con-
  taining 49  NPL Sites  Volumes  and  1  National Overview
  Volume, PB92-963253. See also  PB91-921226. 63p.
  Subject  index keywords: Hazardous materials, Pollution
  control, Louisiana, Superfund,  National Priorities List, Clean-
  up.

0201  National Priorities List Sites: Louisiana, 1992
  Order Number PB93-963218CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Dec 92
  The publication provides  general Superfund background in-
  formation and descriptions of activities at each State Nation-
  al Priorities  List (NPL) site. It clearly describes what the prob-
  lems are, what EPA and others participating in site cleanups
  are doing, and how the nation  can  move ahead  in solving
  these serious problems.  Compiles site summary fact sheets
  on each  State site  being cleaned up under the  Superfund
  Program.
  Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing  Order, de-
  posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
  and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
  paper copy or microfiche. Also available  as a package  con-
  taining 49 NPL Sites, PB93-963250. 64p.
  Subject  index keywords: Hazardous materials, Pollution
  control,  Louisiana, Superfund, National Priorities  List, Clean-
  up.

0202  National Priorities List Sites: Maine
  Order Number PB91-921227CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 90
  Together with the companion National  Overview  volume this
  publication  provides general Superfund background informa-
  tion and descriptions of activities at each State National Pri-
  orities List  (NPL) site. The  document is intended to clearly
  describe what the problems are, what EPA and  others par-
  ticipating in site cleanups are doing, and how the Nation can
  move ahead  in solving these serious  problems. The State
  volume compiles site summary  fact sheets on  each State
  site being cleaned up under the Superfund  program.
  Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
  posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada
  and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also  available in
  paper copy or microfiche.  55p.
  Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Pollution
  control, Maine, Superfund, Cleanup.

0203  National Priorities List Sites: Maine
  Order Number PB92-963204CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 91
  Together with  the companion national  overview  volume the
  publication  provides general Superfund background informa-
  tion and descriptions of activities at each State National Pri-
  orities List (NPL) site. The report clearly describes what the
  problems are, what EPA and  others participating  in site
  cleanups are  doing, and how the nation can move ahead in
  solving these serious problems. Also included are sites sum-
  mary fact sheets on each State  site being cleaned up under
  the Superfund program.
  Specifications: Available  on Standing Order,  deposit ac-
  count required  (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada, and
  Mexico;  all others  $400). Single copies  also  available in
  paper copy or microfiche. Also available as a package con-
  taining 49  NPL Sites  Volumes  and  1 National Overview
  Volume, PB92-963253. See also  PB91-921227. 59p.
  Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Pollution
  control, Maine, Superfund, National Priorities List,  Cleanup.

0204  National Priorities List Sites: Maine, 1992
  Order Number PB93-963219CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Dec 92
  The  publication provides  general Superfund background in-
  formation and descriptions of activities at each State Nation-
  al  Priorities  List (NPL) site. It clearly describes what the prob-
  lems are, what EPA and others participating in site cleanups
  are doing, and how the nation  can  move ahead in solving
  these serious problems.  Compiles site  summary  fact sheets
  on each  State site  being cleaned up  under the Superfund
  Program.
  Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
  posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
  and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also  available in
  paper copy or microfiche. Also available as a package con-
  taining 49 NPL Sites, PB93-963250. 64p.
                                                                                                                 35

-------
ADMINISTRATIVE & MANAGEMENT: Special Reports
  Subject  Index keywords: Hazardous materials, Pollution
  control, Maine, Superfund, National Priorities List, Cleanup.

0205   National Priorities List Sites: Maryland
  Order Number PB91-921228CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 90
  Together with the companion National Overview volume this
  publication provides general Superfund background informa-
  tion and descriptions of activities at each State  National Pri-
  orities  List (NPL)  site. The  document  is  intended to clearly
  describe what the problems are, what EPA and others par-
  ticipating in site cleanups are doing, and how  the Nation can
  move ahead  in solving these serious problems. The State
  volume compiles  site summary  fact sheets  on each State
  site being  cleaned up under the Superfund program.
  Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
  posit account required (minimum deposit  $200 U.S., Canada
  and Mexico; all others S400). Single copies also available in
  paper copy or microfiche. 49p.
  Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Pollution
  control, Maryland, Superfund, Cleanup.

0206   National Priorities List Sites: Maryland
  Order Number PB92-963218CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 91
  Together with  the companion national overview volume the
  publication provides general Superfund background informa-
  tion and descriptions of activities at each State  National Pri-
  orities List (NPL) site. The report clearly describes what the
  problems  are, what EPA and  others participating  in site
  cleanups are  doing, and how the nation can  move ahead in
  solving these serious problems. Also included are sites sum-
  mary fact  sheets on each State  site being cleaned up under
  the Superfund program.
  Specifications: Available on Standing Order,  deposit ac-
  count required  (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada, and
  Mexico; all others  $400).  Single copies also  available in
  paper copy or microfiche. Also available as a package  con-
  taining 49 NPL Sites Volumes  and  1  National Overview
  Volume, PB92-963253. See  also  PB91-921228. 67p.
  Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Pollution
  control, Maryland, Superfund, National Priorities List, Clean-
  up.

0207  National Priorities List Sites: Maryland, 1992
  Order Number PB93-963220CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
  Environmental  Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Dec 92
  The publication provides general Superfund background in-
  formation and descriptions of activities at each State Nation-
  al Priorities List (NPL) site. It clearly describes  what the prob-
  lems are, what EPA and others participating in site cleanups
  are  doing, and how the nation  can  move  ahead in solving
  these serious problems.  Compiles site summary fact sheets
  on each State site  being cleaned up under  the Superfund
  Program.
  Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
  posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
  and Mexico; all others $400). Single  copies also available in
  paper copy or microfiche. Also available as a package  con-
  taining 49  NPL Sites, PB93-963250. 68p.
  Subject  index keywords: Hazardous materials,  Pollution
  control,  Maryland, Superfund,  National Priorities List, Clean-
  up.

0208  National Priorities List Sites: Massachusetts
  Order Number PB91-921229CDH, price: PC A05/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 90
  Together with the companion National Overview volume this
  publication  provides general Superfund background informa-
  tion and descriptions of activities at each State National Pri-
  orities List  (NPL)  site. The document is  intended to clearly
  describe what the problems are, what EPA and others par-
  ticipating in site cleanups are doing, and how the Nation can
  move ahead  in solving these serious  problems. The State
  volume compiles  site summary  fact sheets on each State
  site being cleaned up under the Superfund program.
  Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
  posit account required (minimum deposit  $200 U.S., Canada
  and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
  paper copy or microfiche. 90p.
  Subject  index keywords: Hazardous materials,  Pollution
  control, Massachusetts, Superfund, Cleanup.

0209  National Priorities List Sites: Massachusetts
  Order Number PB92-963206CDH, price: PC A05/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 91
  Together with  the companion  national  overview volume the
  publication  provides general Superfund background informa-
  tion and descriptions of activities at each State National Pri-
  orities List (NPL) site. The report clearly  describes what the
  problems are, what EPA and  others participating  in site
  cleanups are doing, and  how the nation can move ahead in
  solving these serious problems. Also included are sites sum-
  mary fact sheets on each State site being cleaned up under
  the Superfund program.
  Specifications: Available on  Standing Order,  deposit ac-
  count required  (minimum deposit $200  U.S., Canada, and
  Mexico;  all others  $400). Single copies also  available  in
  paper copy or microfiche. Also available  as a package con-
  taining 49  NPL Sites Volumes  and  1  National Overview
  Volume, PB92-963253. See also  PB91-921229. 96p.
  Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials,  Pollution
  control,  Puerto  Rico, Superfund,  National Priorities  List,
  Cleanup.

0210  National Priorities List Sites: Massachusetts, 1992
  Order Number PB93-963221CDH, price: PC A06/MF A02
  Environmental  Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Dec 92
  The  publication provides general Superfund background in-
  formation and descriptions of activities at each State Nation-
  al  Priorities  List (NPL) site. It clearly describes what the prob-
  lems are, what EPA and  others participating in site cleanups
  are doing, and how the  nation can move ahead  in solving
  these serious problems.  Compiles site  summary fact sheets
  on each  State site  being cleaned up  under the Superfund
  Program.
  Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
  posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
  and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in

-------
                                                                     ADMINISTRATIVE & MANAGEMENT: Special
                                                                                                           Reports
  paper copy or microfiche. Also available as a package con-
  taining 49 NPL Sites, PB93-963250. 109p.
  Subject  index keywords: Hazardous materials,  Pollution
  control, Massachusetts,  Superfund,  National Priorities List,
  Cleanup.

0211   National Priorities List Sites: Michigan
  Order Number PB91-921230CDH, price: PC A10/MF A02
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 90
  Together with the companion National  Overview volume this
  publication provides general Superfund background informa-
  tion and descriptions of activities at each State National Pri-
  orities  List (NPL)  site. The document is intended to  clearly
  describe what the problems are, what  EPA and others par-
  ticipating in site cleanups are doing, and how the Nation can
  move ahead  in solving these serious  problems. The State
  volume compiles  site  summary fact sheets on each State
  site being cleaned up under the Superfund  program.
  Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
  posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada
  and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
  paper copy or microfiche. 202p.
  Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials,  Pollution
  control, Michigan,  Superfund, Cleanup.
0212   National Priorities List Sites: Michigan
  Order Number PB92-963247CDH, price: PC A10/MF A03
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 91
  Together with  the companion  national  overview volume the
  publication provides general Superfund background informa-
  tion and descriptions of activities at each State National Pri-
  orities  List (NPL) site. The report clearly describes  what the
  problems  are, what EPA and  others participating  in site
  cleanups are doing,  and  how the nation can move  ahead in
  solving these serious problems. Also included are sites sum-
  mary fact sheets on each State  site being  cleaned up under
  the Superfund program.
  Specifications: Available on  Standing Order,  deposit ac-
  count required  (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada, and
  Mexico; all others  $400). Single copies  also  available  in
  paper copy or microfiche. Also available as a package con-
  taining 49  NPL Sites Volumes  and  1 National  Overview
  Volume, PB92-963253. See also PB91-921230. 205p.
  Subject index keywords:  Hazardous materials,  Pollution
  control, Michigan,  Superfund, National  Priorities List,  Clean-
  up.

0213   National Priorities List Sites: Michigan, 1992
  Order Number PB93-963222CDH, price: PC A10/MF A03
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Solid Waste and Emergency Response;  Dec 92
  The publication provides general Superfund  background in-
  formation and descriptions of activities at each State Nation-
  al Priorities List (NPL) site. It clearly describes what the prob-
  lems are, what EPA and  others participating in site cleanups
  are  doing, and how the  nation can  move ahead in solving
  these serious problems.  Compiles site  summary fact  sheets
  on each State site  being cleaned up  under the Superfund
  Program.
  Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
  posit account required  (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
  and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
  paper copy or microfiche. Also available as a package con-
  taining 49 NPL Sites, PB93-963250. 208p.
  Subject  index keywords: Hazardous materials,  Pollution
  control, Michigan, Superfund,  National Priorities List, Clean-
  up.

0214  National Priorities List Sites: Minnesota
  Order Number PB91-921231CDH, price: PC A06/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 90
  Together with the companion National Overview volume this
  publication provides general Superfund background informa-
  tion and descriptions of activities at each State National Pri-
  orities  List (NPL)  site. The  document is intended to clearly
  describe what the problems are, what EPA and others par-
  ticipating in site cleanups are doing, and how the Nation can
  move ahead  in solving these serious problems. The State
  volume compiles  site  summary  fact sheets on each State
  site being  cleaned up under the Superfund  program.
  Specifications: Paper  copy available on Standing Order, de-
  posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada
  and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
  paper copy or microfiche. 122p.
  Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials,  Pollution
  control, Minnesota, Superfund, Cleanup.

0215  National Priorities List Sites: Minnesota
  Order Number PB92-963211CDH, price: PC A07/MF A02
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 91
  Together with the companion  national overview volume the
  publication provides general Superfund background informa-
  tion and descriptions of activities at each State National Pri-
  orities List (NPL) site.  The report clearly describes  what the
  problems  are, what EPA  and  others  participating  in site
  cleanups are doing,  and  how the nation can move  ahead in
  solving these serious problems. Also included are sites sum-
  mary fact  sheets on each State  site being  cleaned  up under
  the Superfund program.
  Specifications: Available on  Standing Order,  deposit ac-
  count required  (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada, and
  Mexico; all others  $400).  Single copies  also  available  in
  paper copy or microfiche. Also available as a package  con-
  taining 49 NPL Sites Volumes  and 1 National  Overview
  Volume, PB92-963253. See also  PB91-921231. 133p.
  Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials,  Pollution
  control, Minnesota, Superfund, National Priorities List, Clean-
  up.

0216 National Priorities List Sites: Minnesota, 1992
  Order Number PB93-963223CDH, price: PC A07/MF A02
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Dec 92
  The publication provides general Superfund background in-
  formation and descriptions of activities at each State Nation-
  al  Priorities List (NPL) site. It clearly describes what the prob-
  lems are, what EPA and  others participating in site  cleanups
  are doing, and  how the  nation can  move ahead in solving
  these serious problems. Compiles site summary fact  sheets
  on each State site  being cleaned up under the Superfund
  Program.
  Specifications: Paper  copy  available on Standing Order, de-
  posit account required  (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
                                                                                                                 37

-------
ADMINISTRATIVE & MANAGEMENT: Special Reports
  and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
  paper copy or microfiche. Also available as a package con-
  taining 49 NPL Sites, PB93-963250. 133p.
  Subject  index keywords: Hazardous  materials,  Pollution
  control, Minnesota, Superfund, National Priorities List, Clean-
  up.

0217 National Priorities List Sites: Mississippi
  Order Number PB91-921232CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 90
  Together with the companion National Overview volume this
  publication  provides general Superfund background informa-
  tion and descriptions of activities at each State National Pri-
  orities List  (NPL)  site. The  document is intended to clearly
  describe  what the problems are, what EPA and others par-
  ticipating in site cleanups are doing, and how  the Nation can
  move ahead in solving these serious problems. The State
  volume compiles  site  summary fact sheets  on each State
  site being cleaned up under the Superfund program.
  Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
  posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada
  and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
  paper copy or microfiche. 35p.
  Subject  index keywords: Hazardous  materials,  Pollution
  control, Mississippi, Superfund, Cleanup.

0218 National Priorities List Sites: Mississippi
  Order Number PB92-963224CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 91
  Together with the companion national overview volume the
  publication  provides general Superfund background informa-
  tion and descriptions of activities at each State National Pri-
  orities List  (NPL)  site. The report clearly describes what the
  problems are,  what EPA and  others  participating  in  site
  cleanups are doing, and how the nation  can  move ahead in
  solving these serious problems.  Also included are sites sum-
  mary fact sheets on each State site being cleaned up under
  the Superfund program.
  Specifications: Available on Standing  Order,  deposit ac-
  count required (minimum deposit $200  U.S., Canada, and
  Mexico; all  others  $400).  Single copies also  available in
  paper copy or microfiche. Also available as a package con-
  taining 49  NPL Sites Volumes and 1  National  Overview
  Volume, PB92-963253. See also PB91-921232. 47p.
  Subject  index keywords: Hazardous  materials,  Pollution
  control, Mississippi, Superfund,  National Priorities List, Clean-
  up.

0219 National Priorities List Sites: Mississippi, 1992
  Order Number PB93-963224CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Dec 92
  The publication provides general Superfund  background in-
  formation and descriptions of activities at each State Nation-
  al Priorities List (NPL) site. It clearly describes what the prob-
  lems are, what EPA and others  participating in site cleanups
  are doing,  and how the  nation  can move ahead in  solving
  these serious  problems. Compiles site summary fact sheets
  on each State site being cleaned  up under the Superfund
  Program.
  Specifications: Paper copy available on  Standing Order, de-
  posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
  and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
  paper copy or microfiche. Also available as a package con-
  taining 49 NPL Sites, PB93-963250. 46p.
  Subject index  keywords: Hazardous  materials,  Pollution
  control, Mississippi, Superfund, National Priorities List, Clean-
  up.

0220  National Priorities List Sites: Missouri
  Order Number PB91-921233CDH, price: PC A05/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 90
  Together with the companion National Overview volume this
  publication  provides general Superfund background informa-
  tion and descriptions of activities at each State National Pri-
  orities List  (NPL)  site. The document is intended to clearly
  describe what the problems are, what EPA and others par-
  ticipating in site cleanups are doing, and how the Nation can
  move ahead  in  solving these serious problems. The State
  volume compiles  site  summary fact sheets on each State
  site being cleaned up under the Superfund  program.
  Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
  posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada
  and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
  paper copy or microfiche. 82p.
  Subject index  keywords: Hazardous  materials,  Pollution
  control, Missouri, Superfund, Cleanup.

0221  National Priorities List Sites: Missouri
  Order Number PB92-963214CDH, price: PC A05/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 91
  Together with the companion national overview volume the
  publication  provides general Superfund background informa-
  tion and descriptions of activities at each State National Pri-
  orities List  (NPL) site.  The report clearly describes what the
  problems are, what  EPA and  others  participating  in site
  cleanups are doing, and how the nation can move ahead in
  solving these serious problems. Also included are sites sum-
  mary fact sheets on each State site being cleaned up under
  the Superfund program.
  Specifications:  Available on Standing  Order,  deposit  ac-
  count required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada, and
  Mexico; all  others $400). Single copies  also  available  in
  paper copy or microfiche. Also available as a package con-
  taining 49  NPL  Sites Volumes and 1  National  Overview
  Volume, PB92-963253. See also PB91-921233. 87p.
  Subject index  keywords: Hazardous  materials,  Pollution
  control, Missouri, Superfund, National Priorities List, Cleanup.

0222   National Priorities List Sites: Missouri, 1992
  Order Number PB93-963225CDH, price: PC A05/MF A02
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Dec 92
  The publication provides general Superfund background  in-
  formation and descriptions of activities at each State Nation-
  al Priorities List (NPL)  site. It clearly describes what the prob-
  lems are, what EPA and others participating in site cleanups
  are doing,  and how the  nation can  move ahead in solving
  these serious problems. Compiles site summary fact sheets
  on  each State site being cleaned up under  the  Superfund
  Program.
  Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
  posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
38

-------
                                                                      ADMINISTRATIVE & MANAGEMENT: Special
                                                                                                            Reports
  and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
  paper copy or microfiche. Also available as a package con-
  taining 49 NPL Sites, PB93-963250. 98p.
  Subject  index keywords:  Hazardous  materials, Pollution
  control, Missouri, Superfund,  National Priorities List, Cleanup.

0223  National Priorities List  Sites: Montana
  Order Number PB91-921234CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 90
  Together with the companion National Overview volume this
  publication provides general  Superfund background informa-
  tion and descriptions of activities at each State National Pri-
  orities  List (NPL)  site. The document is intended to clearly
  describe what the problems  are, what EPA and others par-
  ticipating in site cleanups are doing, and how  the Nation can
  move ahead  in solving these serious problems.  The State
  volume compiles  site summary fact  sheets  on each State
  site being  cleaned up under the Superfund program.
  Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
  posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada
  and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
  paper copy or microfiche. 54p.
  Subject index keywords:  Hazardous materials, Pollution
  control, Montana, Superfund,  Cleanup.

0224  National Priorities List  Sites: Montana
  Order Number PB92-963235CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Emergency and Remedial  Response; Sep 91
  Together with the companion national overview volume the
  publication provides general  Superfund background informa-
  tion and descriptions of activities at each State National Pri-
  orities List (NPL) site. The report clearly  describes what the
  problems  are, what EPA  and  others participating  in  site
  cleanups are doing,  and how the nation can move ahead in
  solving these serious problems. Also included are sites sum-
  mary fact sheets
  Specifications: Available on Standing Order, deposit  ac-
  count required (minimum  deposit  $200  U.S., Canada, and
  Mexico; all others $400). Single  copies also available in
  paper copy or microfiche. Also available  as a package con-
  taining  49 NPL  Sites Volumes and  1  National OverView
  Volume, PB92-963253. See also  PB91-921234. 59p.
  Subject index  keywords:   Hazardous materials, Pollution
  control, Montana,  Superfund, National Priorities List,  Clean-
  up.

0225 National Priorities List Sites: Montana,  1992
  Order Number PB93-963226CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Dec 92
  The publication provides general Superfund background in-
  formation and descriptions of activities at each State Nation-
  al  Priorities List (NPL) site. It clearly describes  what the prob-
  lems are, what EPA  and others participating in site cleanups
  are doing, and how the nation can move ahead in solving
  these serious problems. Compiles  site summary fact  sheets
  on each State site being cleaned up  under  the Superfund
  Program.
  Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
  posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
  and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
  paper copy or microfiche. Also available as a package con-
  taining 49 NPL Sites, PB93-963250. 56p.
  Subject  index keywords:  Hazardous materials, Pollution
  control, Montana, Superfund, National Priorities List, Clean-
  up.

0226  National Priorities List Sites: Nebraska
  Order Number PB91-921236CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 90
  Together with the companion National Overview volume this
  publication provides general  Superfund background informa-
  tion and descriptions of activities at each State National Pri-
  orities  List (NPL)  site. The  document  is intended to clearly
  describe what the problems  are, what EPA and others  par-
  ticipating in site cleanups are doing, and how the Nation can
  move ahead  in solving these serious problems. The State
  volume compiles  site summary fact sheets on each State
  site being  cleaned up under the Superfund program.
  Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
  posit account'required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada
  and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
  paper copy or microfiche. 43p.
  Subject index keywords:  Hazardous materials, Pollution
  control, Nebraska, Superfund, Cleanup.

0227 National Priorities List  Sites: Nebraska
  Order Number PB92-963233CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 91
  Together with the companion national overview volume the
  publication provides general  Superfund background informa-
  tion and descriptions of. activities at each State National Pri-
  orities List (NPL) site. The report clearly describes what the
  problems  are, what EPA  and  others  participating  in  site
  cleanups are doing,  and how the nation can move ahead in
  solving these serious problems. Also included are sites sum-
  mary fact  sheets on each State site being cleaned up under
  the Superfund program.
  Specifications: Available on Standing Order, deposit  ac-
  count required  (minimum  deposit  $200 U.S.,  Canada,  and
  Mexico; all others  $400).  Single  copies also available in
  paper copy or microfiche. Also available as a  package  con-
  taining  49 NPL Sites  Volumes and ,1  National Overview
  Volume, PB92-963253. See also PB9.1-921236. 56p.
  Subject index  keywords:   Hazardous materials, Pollution
  control, Nebraska, Superfund, National Priorities List,  Clean-
  up.

0228 National Priorities List Sites: Nebraska,  1992
  Order Number PB93-963227CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington,  DC. Office of
  Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Dec 92
  The publication provides general Superfund background in-
  formation and descriptions of activities at each State Nation-
  al  Priorities List (NPL) site. It clearly describes what the prob-
  lems are, what EPA  and others participating in site cleanups
  are doing, and how the nation can move ahead in solving
  these serious problems. Compiles  site  summary fact  sheets
  on each State site  being cleaned up  under the Superfund
  Program.
  Specifications:  Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
  posit account required (minimum deposit $200  U.S., Canada,
                                                                                                                 39

-------
ADMINISTRATIVE & MANAGEMENT: Special Reports
  and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
  paper copy or microfiche. Also available as a package con-
  taining 49 NPL Sites, PB93-963250. 60p.
  Subject  index keywords: Hazardous materials,  Pollution
  control, Nebraska, Superfund, National Priorities List, Clean-
  up,

0229 National Priorities List Sites: New Hampshire
  Order Number PB91-921237CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 90
  Together with the companion National Overview volume this
  publication  provides general Superfund background informa-
  tion and descriptions of activities at each State National Pri-
  orities List  (NPL) site. The document is intended to clearly
  describe  what the problems are, what EPA and others par-
  ticipating in site cleanups are doing, and how the Nation can
  move ahead in solving these serious problems. The State
  volume compiles site  summary fact sheets on each State
  site being cleaned up under the Superfund  program.
  Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
  posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada
  and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
  paper copy or microfiche. 65p.
  Subject  index keywords: Hazardous materials,  Pollution
  control, New Hampshire, Superfund, Cleanup.

0230 National Priorities List Sites: New Hampshire
  Order Number PB92-963205CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 91
  Together with the companion national overview volume the
  publication  provides general Superfund background informa-
  tion and descriptions of activities at each State National Pri-
  orities List  (NPL) site.  The report clearly describes what the
  problems are, what  EPA  and  others  participating  in site
  cleanups are doing, and how the nation can move ahead in
  solving these serious problems. Also included are sites sum-
  mary fact sheets on each State site being cleaned up under
  the Superfund program.
  Specifications: Available  on Standing Order,  deposit  ac-
  count required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada, and
  Mexico; all others $400). Single copies  also  available  in
  paper copy or microfiche. Also available as a package con-
  taining 49  NPL  Sites Volumes and  1  National  Overview
  Volume, PB92-963253. See also PB91-921237. 74p.
  Subject  Index keywords: Hazardous materials,  Pollution
  control,  New Hampshire, Superfund, National Priorities List,
  Cleanup.

0231 National Priorities List Sites: New Hampshire,  1992
  Order Number PB93-963228CDH, price: PC A05/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Dec 92
  The publication provides general Superfund background  in-
  formation and descriptions of activities at each State  Nation-
  al Priorities List (NPL)  site.  It clearly describes what the prob-
  lems are, what EPA and others  participating in site cleanups
  are doing,  and how the nation  can move ahead in  solving
  these serious  problems. Compiles site summary fact sheets
  on each State site being  cleaned up under  the  Superfund
  Program.
  Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
  posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
  and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
  paper copy or microfiche. Also available as a package con-
  taining 49 NPL Sites, PB93-963250. 80p.
  Subject index  keywords:  Hazardous  materials,  Pollution
  control,  New Hampshire, Superfund,  National Priorities List,
  Cleanup.

0232  National Priorities List Sites: New Jersey
  Order Number PB91-921235CDH, price: PC A13/MF A02
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 90
  Together with the companion National Overview volume this
  publication  provides general Superfund background informa-
  tion and descriptions of activities at each State National Pri-
  orities List  (NPL) site. The document is intended to clearly
  describe what the problems are, what EPA and others par-
  ticipating in site cleanups are doing, and how the Nation can
  move ahead in  solving these serious problems. The State
  volume  compiles site  summary  fact  sheets on each State
  site being cleaned up under the Superfund program.
  Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
  posit account required (minimum deposit $200  U.S., Canada
  and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
  paper copy or microfiche. 276p.
  Subject index  keywords:  Hazardous  materials,  Pollution
  control,  New Jersey, Superfund, Cleanup.

0233  National Priorities List Sites: New Jersey
  Order Number PB92-963241CDH, price: PC A13/MF A03
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 91
  Together with the companion national overview volume the
  publication  provides general Superfund background informa-
  tion and descriptions of eictivities at each State National Pri-
  orities List  (NPL) site.  The report clearly describes what the
  problems  are, what  EPA  and  others participating in  site
  cleanups are doing, and how the nation can move ahead in
  solving these serious problems. Also included are sites sum-
  mary fact sheets on each State  site being cleaned up under
  the Superfund program.
  Specifications:  Available on Standing Order, deposit  ac-
  count required (minimum deposit  $200 U.S.,  Canada,  and
  Mexico; all  others $400). Single  copies  also available in
  paper copy or microfiche. Also available as a package con-
  taining  49  NPL  Sites Volumes and 1  National Overview
  Volume, PB92-963253. See also PB91-921235.  279p.
  Subject index  keywords:  Hazardous  materials,  Pollution
  control,  New Jersey,  Superfund,  National Priorities  List,
  Cleanup.

0234   National Priorities  List Sites: New Jersey, 1992
  Order Number PB93-963229CDH, price: PC A14/MF A03
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Solid Waste and  Emergency Response; Dec 92
  The publication provides general Superfund background in-
  formation and descriptions of activities at each State Nation-
  al Priorities List (NPL)  site. It clearly describes what the prob-
  lems are, what EPA and others  participating in site cleanups
  are doing,  and how the nation  can  move  ahead in solving
  these serious problems. Compiles  site summary fact sheets
  on  each State site being cleaned up under the  Superfund
  Program.
40

-------
                                                                      ADMINISTRATIVE & MANAGEMENT: Special
                                                                                                            Reports
  Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
  posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
  and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
  paper copy or microfiche. Also available  as a package con-
  taining 49 NPL Sites, PB93-963250. 314p.
  Subject  index keywords:  Hazardous materials, Pollution
  control,  New  Jersey,  Superfund,  National  Priorities List,
  Cleanup.

0235  National Priorities List Sites: New Mexico
  Order Number PB91-921238CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 90
  Together with the companion National  Overview volume this
  publication provides general  Superfund background informa-
  tion and descriptions of activities at each State National Pri-
  orities  List (NPL)  site. The  document  is  intended  to clearly
  describe  what the problems  are, what EPA and others par-
  ticipating in site cleanups are doing, and how  the Nation can
  move ahead  in solving these serious  problems. The State
  volume compiles  site summary fact sheets  on each State
  site being cleaned up under the Superfund program.
  Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
  posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada
  and Mexico; all  others $400). Single copies also available in
  paper copy or microfiche. 51 p.
  Subject  index  keywords:  Hazardous materials, Pollution
  control, New Mexico, Superfund, Cleanup.

0236  National Priorities List  Sites: New Mexico
  Order Number PB92-963232CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 91
  Together with the companion national  overview volume the
  publication provides general  Superfund background informa-
  tion and descriptions of activities at each State National Pri-
  orities List (NPL) site. The report clearly describes what the
  problems  are, what EPA  and  others participating  in site
  cleanups are doing, and how the nation can move ahead in
  solving these serious problems. Also included are sites sum-
  mary fact  sheets on each State site being cleaned up under
  the Superfund program.
  Specifications:  Available on Standing Order, deposit ac-
  count required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada, and
  Mexico; all others  $400).  Single  copies  also available  in
  paper copy or microfiche. Also available as a package con-
  taining 49 NPL  Sites  Volumes and  1  National  Overview
  Volume, PB92-963253. See also PB91-921238. 61 p.
  Subject index  keywords:   Hazardous materials, Pollution
  control,  New Mexico,  Superfund,  National  Priorities List,
  Cleanup.

0237  National Priorities List Sites: New Mexico, 1992
  Order Number PB93-963230CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Dec 92
  The publication  provides general Superfund  background in-
  formation and descriptions of activities  at each State Nation-
  al  Priorities List (NPL) site. It clearly describes  what the prob-
  lems are, what EPA and others participating in site cleanups
  are doing, and how the nation can  move ahead in solving
  these serious problems. Compiles site  summary fact sheets
  on  each State site  being cleaned up  under  the Superfund
  Program.
  Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
  posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
  and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
  paper copy or microfiche. Also available  as a package con-
  taining 49 NPL Sites, PB93-963250. 56p.
  Subject:  index keywords:  Hazardous materials, Pollution
  control,  New  Mexico,  Superfund, National  Priorities List,
  Cleanup.

0238  National Priorities List Sites: New York
  Order Number PB91-921239CDH, price: PC A10/MF A02
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 90
  Together with the companion National  Overview volume this
  publication provides general  Superfund background informa-
  tion and descriptions of activities at each State National Pri-
  orities  List (NPL)  site. The  document  is  intended to clearly
  describe  what the problems are, what EPA and others par-
  ticipating in site cleanups are doing, and how  the Nation can
  move ahead  in solving these serious  problems.  The State
  volume compiles  site summary  fact sheets  on each State
  site being cleaned up under the Superfund program.
  Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
  posit account required (minimum deposit  $200 U.S., Canada
  and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
  paper copy or microfiche. 209p.
  Subject  index keywords:  Hazardous materials, Pollution
  control, New York, Superfund, Cleanup.

0239  National Priorities List Sites: New York
  Order Number PB92-963208CDH, price: PC A10/MF A03
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Emergency and Remedial  Response; Sep 91
  Together with the companion national  overview volume the
  publication provides general  Superfund background informa-
  tion and descriptions of activities at each State National Pri-
  orities List (NPL) site. The report clearly describes what the
  problems  are, what EPA and  others participating  in site
  cleanups are doing,  and how the nation can move ahead in
  solving these serious problems. Also included are  sites sum-
  mary fact  sheets on each State site being cleaned up under
  the Superfund program.
  Specifications: Available on Standing Order, deposit  ac-
  count required  (minimum  deposit  $200 U.S., Canada, and
  Mexico; all others  $400). Single  copies also available  in
  paper copy or microfiche. Also available as a package con-
  taining  49 NPL Sites Volumes and  1  National Overview
  Volume, PB92-963253. See also PB91-921239. 216p.
  Subject  index  keywords:  Hazardous materials, Pollution
  control, New York, Superfund, National Priorities List, Clean-
  up.

0240  National Priorities List Sites: New York, 1992
  Order Number PB93-963231CDH, price: PC A11/MF A03
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Dec 92
  The  publication provides general Superfund  background in-
  formation and descriptions of activities  at  each State Nation-
  al  Priorities List (NPL) site. It clearly describes  what the prob-
  lems are, what EPA  and others participating in site cleanups
  are doing, and how the nation can move ahead  in solving
  these serious problems. Compiles  site  summary fact  sheets
                                                                                                                 41

-------
ADMINISTRATIVE & MANAGEMENT: Special Reports
  on each State site being cleaned up under the Superfund
  Program.
  Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
  posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
  and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
  paper copy or microfiche. Also available as a package con-
  taining 49 NPL Sites,  PB93-963250. 238p.
  Subject  Index keywords: Hazardous  materials,  Pollution
  control, New York, Superfund, National Priorities List, Clean-
  up.

0241  National Priorities List Sites: North and South
  Dakota
  Order Number PB91-921241CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 90
  Together with the companion National Overview volume this
  publication  provides general Superfund background  informa-
  tion and descriptions of activities at each State National Pri-
  orities  List  (NPL)  site. The document is  intended to clearly
  describe what the problems are, what EPA and others par-
  ticipating in site cleanups are doing, and how the Nation can
  move ahead in solving these  serious problems. The State
  volume compiles  site summary fact sheets on each State
  site being cleaned up under the Superfund program.
  Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
  posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada
  and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
  paper copy or microfiche. 42p.
  Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials,   Pollution
  control, North Dakota, South Dakota, Superfund, Cleanup.

0242  National Priorities List Sites: North and South
  Dakota, 1992
  Order Number PB93-963233CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington,  DC. Office of
  Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Dec 92
  The publication provides general Superfund background in-
  formation and descriptions of activities at each State Nation-
  al Priorities List (NPL) site. It clearly describes what the prob-
  lems are, what EPA and others participating in site cleanups
  are doing,  and how  the  nation can move ahead in solving
  these serious problems. Compiles site summary fact sheets
  on each State site being cleaned up under the  Superfund
  Program.
  Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
  posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
  and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
  paper copy or microfiche. Also available as a package con-
  taining 49 NPL Sites, PB93-963250. 51 p.
  Subject index  keywords:  Hazardous  materials,  Pollution
  control,  North  Dakota, South Dakota,  Superfund,  National
  Priorities List, Cleanup.
0243  National Priorities List Sites: North Carolina
  Order Number PB91-921240CDH, price: PC A05/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 90
  Together with the companion National Overview volume this
  publication provides  general Superfund background informa-
  tion and descriptions of activities at each State National Pri-
  orities List (NPL) site. The document is intended  to clearly
  describe what the problems are, what EPA and others par-
  ticipating in site cleanups are doing, and how the Nation can
  move ahead in solving these serious problems. The State
  volume compiles site summary fact  sheets  on each State
  site being cleaned up under the Superfund program.
  Specifications: Paper copy available  on Standing Order, de-
  posit account required  (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada
  and Mexico; all others  $400). Single copies also available in
  paper copy or microfiche. 78p.
  Subject index keywords:  Hazardous materials, Pollution
  control, North Carolina, Superfund, Cleanup.

0244   National Priorities List Sites: North Carolina
  Order Number PB92-963209CDH, price: PC A05/MF A01
  Environmental  Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 91
  Together with  the companion national overview volume the
  publication  provides general Superfund background informa-
  tion and descriptions of activities at each State National Pri-
  orities List (NPL) site. The report clearly describes what the
  problems  are,  what EPA  and others participating  in  site
  cleanups are doing, and how the nation can move ahead in
  solving these serious problems. Also  included are sites sum-
  mary fact sheets on each State site being  cleaned up under
  the Superfund  program.
  Specifications: Available on Standing  Order,  deposit  ac-
  count required (minimum deposit  $200 U.S.,  Canada,  and
  Mexico; all  others  $400).  Single  copies  also  available in
  paper copy or microfiche. Also available as a package con-
  taining 49  NPL Sites  Volumes and 1 National Overview
  Volume, PB92-963253. See also PB91-921240. 87p.
  Subject  index keywords: Hazardous  materials,  Pollution
  control, North Carolina, Superfund,  National Priorities  List,
  Cleanup.
0245  National Priorities List Sites: North Carolina, 1992
  Order Number PB93-963232CDH, price: PC A05/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Dec 92
  The publication provides general Superfund background in-
  formation and descriptions of activities at each State Nation-
  al Priorities List (NPL) site. It clearly describes what the prob-
  lems are, what EPA and others participating  in site cleanups
  are doing,  and how the nation can  move ahead in solving
  these serious  problems. Compiles  site summary fact sheets
  on each State site being cleaned up  under the Superfund
  Program.
  Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
  posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
  and Mexico; all others $400). Single  copies also available in
  paper copy or microfiche. Also available as  a  package con-
  taining 49 NPL Sites, PB93-963250. 96p.
  Subject  index  keywords:  Hazardous materials, Pollution
  control, North  Carolina, Superfund,  National Priorities List,
  Cleanup.
0246  National Priorities List Sites: North Dakota and
  South Dakota
  Order Number PB92-963236CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington,  DC. Office of
  Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 91
  Together  with the  companion national overview volume the
  publication provides general Superfund background  informa-
  tion and descriptions of activities at each  State National Pri-
  orities List (NPL) site. The report clearly describes what the
 42

-------
                                                                      ADMINISTRATIVE & MANAGEMENT: Special
                                                                                                            Reports
   problems are, what  EPA  and others participating in site
   cleanups are doing, and how the  nation can move  ahead in
   solving these serious  problems. Also included are sites sum-
   mary fact sheets on each State site being cleaned up under
   the Superfund program.
   Specifications: Available  on  Standing Order,  deposit ac-
   count required (minimum  deposit $200 U.S., Canada, and
   Mexico; all others $400).  Single copies also  available  in
   paper copy or microfiche. Also available as a package con-
   taining 49  NPL  Sites Volumes and  1 National  Overview
   Volume, PB92-963253. See also PB91-921241. 55p.
   Subject index keywords:  Hazardous  materials,  Pollution
   control,  North Dakota, Superfund,  National  Priorities List,
   Cleanup.

 0247  National  Priorities List Sites: Ohio
   Order Number PB91-921242CDH, price: PC A05/MF A01
   Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
   Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 90
   Together with  the companion National Overview volume this
   publication provides general Superfund background  informa-
   tion and descriptions of activities at each State National Pri-
   orities List (NPL) site. The  document  is intended to clearly
   describe what the problems are, what EPA and others par-
   ticipating in site cleanups are doing, and how the Nation can
   move  ahead in solving these  serious problems. The State
   volume compiles site summary fact sheets  on  each State
   site being cleaned up under the Superfund program.
   Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
   posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada
   and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
   paper copy or  microfiche. 10Op.
   Subject index  keywords:  Hazardous materials, Pollution
   control, Ohio, Superfund, Cleanup.

0248 National Priorities List Sites: Ohio
   Order Number PB92-963246CDH, price: PC A06/MF A02
   Environmental  Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
   Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 91
   Together with  the companion national overview  volume the
   publication provides general  Superfund background  informa-
   tion and descriptions of activities at each State National Pri-
   orities  List (NPL)  site.  The  report clearly describes what the
   problems  are,  what  EPA  and others  participating  in site
   cleanups are doing, and how the nation can move ahead in
   solving these serious problems. Also included are sites sum-
   mary fact sheets on each State site being cleaned up under
   the Superfund program.
   Specifications: Available on Standing Order, deposit  ac-
   count required  (minimum deposit  $200 U.S., Canada, and
   Mexico; all  others $400).  Single  copies also available  in
   paper copy or  microfiche. Also available as a package  con-
  taining 49  NPL Sites  Volumes and 1  National Overview
  Volume, PB92-963253. See also PB91-921242. 111p.
  Subject  index keywords:   Hazardous materials,  Pollution
  control, Ohio, Superfund, National Priorities List, Cleanup.

0249  National Priorities List Sites: Ohio, 1992
  Order Number  PB93-963234CDH, price: PC A06/MF A02
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Dec 92
  The publication provides general Superfund  background in-
  formation and descriptions of activities at each State Nation-
  al Priorities List (NPL) site. It clearly describes what the prob-
   lems are, what EPA and others participating in site cleanups
   are doing, and how the nation can move ahead in solving
   these serious problems. Compiles site summary fact sheets
   on each  State site being  cleaned up under the Superfund
   Program.
   Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
   posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
   and Mexico;  all others $400). Single copies also available in
   paper copy or microfiche.  Also available as a package con-
   taining 49 NPL Sites, PB93-963250. 117p.
   Subject index keywords:  Hazardous  materials,  Pollution
   control, Ohio, Superfund, National Priorities List, Cleanup.

 0250  National Priorities List Sites: Oklahoma
   Order Number PB91-921243CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
   Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
   Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 90
   Together with the companion National Overview  volume this
   publication provides general  Superfund  background  informa-
   tion and descriptions of activities at each State National Pri-
   orities List (NPL)  site. The document is intended to clearly
   describe what the problems  are, what EPA and  others par-
   ticipating in site cleanups are doing, and how the Nation can
   move  ahead  in solving  these  serious problems.  The State
   volume compiles  site summary fact sheets  on  each State
   site being cleaned up under the Superfund program.
   Specifications: Paper copy available on  Standing Order, de-
   posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada
   and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also  available in
   paper copy or microfiche. 51 p.
   Subject  index keywords:  Hazardous  materials, Pollution
   control, Oklahoma, Superfund, Cleanup.

 0251  National Priorities List  Sites: Oklahoma
   Order Number PB92-963221CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
   Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
   Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 91
   Together with the companion national overview volume the
   publication provides general Superfund background  informa-
   tion and descriptions of activities at each State National Pri-
   orities List (NPL) site.  The  report clearly describes what the
   problems  are, what EPA  and others  participating in site
   cleanups are  doing, and how the nation can move ahead in
   solving these  serious problems. Also included are sites sum-
   mary fact  sheets on each State site being cleaned up under
   the Superfund program.
   Specifications: Available  on  Standing  Order, deposit  ac-
   count required (minimum deposit $200  U.S., Canada, and
   Mexico; all others $400).  Single copies also available  in
  paper copy or microfiche. Also available  as a package  con-
  taining 49  NPL  Sites Volumes  and 1  National Overview
   Volume, PB92-963253. See also PB91-921243. 61 p.
  Subject index  keywords: Hazardous  materials,  Pollution
  control, Oklahoma, Superfund, National Priorities List, Clean-
  up.

0252  National Priorities List Sites: Oklahoma, 1992
  Order Number PB93-963235CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Dec 92
  The publication  provides general Superfund background in-
 . formation and descriptions of activities at each State Nation-
  al Priorities List (NPL) site. It clearly describes  what the prob-
                                                                                                                 43

-------
ADMINISTRATIVE & MANAGEMENT: Special Reports
  lems are, what EPA and others participating in site cleanups
  are doing, and how the nation can  move ahead in solving
  these serious problems. Compiles site summary  fact sheets
  on each State site  being cleaned up under  the Superfund
  Program.
  Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
  posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
  and Mexico; all others $400). Single  copies also  available in
  paper copy or microfiche. Also available as a package con-
  taining 49 NPL Sites, PB93-963250. 62p.
  Subject  Index keywords: Hazardous materials, Pollution
  control, Oklahoma, Superfund, National Priorities  List, Clean-
  up.

0253  National Priorities List Sites: Oregon
  Order Number PB91-921244CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 90
  Together with the companion National Overview  volume this
  publication  provides general Superfund background  informa-
  tion and descriptions of activities at each State National Pri-
  orities  List  (NPL)  site. The document is  intended to clearly
  describe what the problems are, what EPA and  others  par-
  ticipating in site cleanups are doing, and how  the Nation can
  move ahead in solving these  serious problems. The State
  volume compiles  site summary fact  sheets  on  each State
  site being cleaned up under the Superfund program.
  Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
  posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada
  and  Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also  available in
  paper copy or microfiche. 46p.
  Subject Index keywords: Hazardous materials,  Pollution
  control, Oregon, Superfund, Cleanup.

0254  National Priorities List Sites: Oregon
  Order Number PB92-963245CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 91
  Together with the companion national overview  volume the
  publication provides general Superfund background informa-
  tion  and descriptions of activities at  each State National Pri-
  orities List (NPL)  site. The report clearly describes what the
  problems are, what EPA  and others participating in  site
  cleanups are doing, and how the nation can  move ahead in
  solving these serious problems. Also included are sites sum-
  mary fact sheets  on each State site being cleaned up under
  the Superfund program.
  Specifications:  Available on  Standing  Order,  deposit ac-
  count required (minimum deposit $200  U.S., Canada,  and
  Mexico; all others  $400).  Single copies also  available in
  paper copy or microfiche. Also available as a package  con-
  taining  49  NPL  Sites Volumes and 1  National Overview
  Volume, PB92-963253. See also PB91-921244. 57p.
  Subject index  keywords: Hazardous  materials,  Pollution
  control, Oregon, Superfund, National Priorities List,  Cleanup.

 0255  National Priorities List Sites: Oregon, 1992
  Order Number PB93-963236CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Dec 92
  The publication  provides general Superfund  background in-
  formation and descriptions of activities at each State Nation-
  al Priorities List (NPL) site. It clearly describes what the prob-
  lems are, what EPA and others participating  in site  cleanups
  are doing, and how the  nation can move ahead in solving
  these serious problems. Compiles site summary fact sheets
  on each State site being cleaned up under the Superfund
  Program.
  Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
  posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
  and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
  paper copy or microfiche. Also available as a package con-
  taining 49 NPL Sites, PB93-963250. 62p.
  Subject index  keywords:  Hazardous  materials,  Pollution
  control, Oregon, Superfund,  National Priorities List,  Cleanup.

0256  National Priorities List Sites: Pennsylvania
  Order Number PB91-921245CDH, price: PC A11/MF A02
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 90
  Together with the companion National Overview volume this
  publication  provides general Superfund background informa-
  tion and descriptions of activities at each State National Pri-
  orities List  (NPL)  site.  The document is intended to clearly
  describe what the problems are, what EPA and others par-
  ticipating  in site cleanups are doing, and how the Nation can
  move ahead in  solving these serious  problems. The  State
  volume compiles  site summary fact sheets on each  State
  site being cleaned up under the Superfund program.
  Specifications: Paper copy  available on Standing Order, de-
  posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada
  and  Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
  paper copy or microfiche. 245p.
  Subject  index  keywords:  Hazardous materials,  Pollution
  control, Pennsylvania, Superfund, Cleanup.

0257  National Priorities List Sites: Pennsylvania
  Order Number PB92-963240CDH, price: PC A11/MF A03
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 91
  Together with the companion national overview volume the
  publication provides general Superfund background informa-
  tion  and descriptions of activities at each State  National Pri-
  orities List  (NPL) site. The report clearly describes what the
  problems  are, what EPA and others  participating in site
  cleanups are doing, and how the nation can move ahead in
  solving these serious problems. Also included are sites sum-
  mary fact sheets on each State site being cleaned up  under
  the Superfund program.
  Specifications:  Available on  Standing Order,  deposit  ac-
  count required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada, and
  Mexico; all others  $400).  Single copies also  available  in
  paper copy or microfiche. Also available as a package con-
  taining 49  NPL  Sites  Volumes and  1  National  Overview
  Volume, PB92-963253. See  also PB91-921245. 250p.
  Subject  index  keywords:  Hazardous materials,  Pollution
  control,  Pennsylvania,  Superfund,  National  Priorities List,
  Cleanup.
0258  National Priorities List Sites:  Pennsylvania, 1992
  Order Number PB93-963237CDH, price: PC A12/MF A03
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC.  Office of
  Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Dec 92
  Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
  posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
  and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
 44

-------
                                                                      ADMINISTRATIVE & MANAGEMENT: Special
                                                                                                            Reports
   paper copy or microfiche. Also available as a package con-
   taining 49 NPL Sites, PB93-963250. 272p.
   Subject index  keywords:  Hazardous  materials,  Pollution
   control,  Pennsylvania, Superfund,  National Priorities List,
   Cleanup.

 0259  National Priorities List Sites: Puerto Rico
   Order Number PB91-921257CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
   Environmental Protection  Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
   Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 90
   Together with the companion National Overview volume this
   publication provides general  Superfund background informa-
   tion and descriptions of activities at each State National Pri-
   orities List (NPL) site.  The document is intended to clearly
   describe what the problems are, what EPA and others par-
   ticipating in site cleanups are doing, and how the Nation can
   move  ahead in  solving these serious problems. The State
   volume compiles site summary fact  sheets  on each State
   site being cleaned up under the Superfund program.
   Specifications: Paper copy available  on Standing Order, de-
   posit account required  (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada
   and Mexico; all others  $400). Single copies also available in
   paper copy or microfiche.  47p.
   Subject  index  keywords:  Hazardous  materials, Pollution
   control, Puerto Rico, Superfund, Cleanup.

0260  National Priorities List  Sites: Puerto Rico
   Order Number PB92-963207CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
   Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
   Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 91
  Together with the companion national overview volume the
  publication provides general  Superfund background informa-
  tion and descriptions of activities at each State National Pri-
  orities List  (NPL) site. The report clearly describes what the
  problems  are, what  EPA and others  participating  in site
  cleanups are doing, and how the nation can move ahead in
  solving these serious problems. Also included are sites sum-
  mary fact sheets on each State site being cleaned up under
  the Superfund program.
  Specifications: Available  on Standing Order,  deposit  ac-
  count required (minimum deposit  $200  U.S., Canada, and
  Mexico; all  others $400). Single  copies also  available  in
  paper copy or microfiche. Also available as a package  con-
  taining 49  NPL  Sites  Volumes and 1  National  Overview
  Volume, PB92-963253. See also PB91-921257. 59p.
  Subject index  keywords:  Hazardous materials, Pollution
  control, Puerto  Rico,  Superfund,  National  Priorities  List,
  Cleanup.

0261   National Priorities List Sites: Puerto Rico and Virgin
  Islands, 1992
  Order Number PB93-963238CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Dec 92
  The publication  provides general  Superfund background in-
  formation and descriptions of activities at each State Nation-
  al Priorities List (NPL) site. It clearly describes what the prob-
  lems are, what EPA and others participating in site cleanups
  are doing, and how the nation can move ahead in solving
  these serious problems. Compiles site summary fact sheets
  on each State site being cleaned up under the Superfund
  Program.
  Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
  posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
   and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
   paper copy or microfiche. Also available as a package con-
   taining 49 NPL Sites, PB93-963250. 57p.
   Subject index  keywords:  Hazardous  materials,  Pollution
   control, Puerto Rico, Virgin Islands, Superfund, National Pri-
   orities List, Cleanup.

 0262  National Priorities List Sites: Rhode Island
   Order Number PB91-921246CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
   Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
   Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 90
   Together with the companion National Overview volume this
   publication provides general  Superfund background informa-
   tion and descriptions of activities at each  State National Pri-
   orities List (NPL) site.  The document is intended  to clearly
   describe what the problems  are, what EPA and others par-
   ticipating in site cleanups are doing, and how the Nation can
   move  ahead  in solving these  serious problems.  The State
   volume compiles site summary fact  sheets  on each State
   site being  cleaned up under the Superfund program.
   Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
   posit account required  (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada
   and Mexico; all others  $400). Single copies also available in
   paper copy or microfiche. 54p.
   Subject index keywords:  Hazardous materials, Pollution
   control, Rhode Island, Superfund, Cleanup.

 0263  National Priorities List  Sites: Rhode  Island
   Order Number PB92-963230CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
   Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC.  Office of
   Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 91
   Together with the companion national overview volume the
   publication provides general  Superfund background informa-
   tion and descriptions of activities at each State National Pri-
   orities  List  (NPL) site. The report clearly describes what the
   problems  are, what  EPA and others  participating  in site
   cleanups are doing, and how the nation can move ahead in
   solving these serious problems. Also included are sites sum-
   mary fact sheets on each State site being cleaned up under
  the Superfund program.
  Specifications: Available on Standing Order, deposit  ac-
  count required (minimum deposit  $200 U.S.,  Canada, and
  Mexico; all others $400). Single  copies  also available  in
  paper copy or  microfiche. Also available as a  package  con-
  taining 49  NPL  Sites  Volumes and 1  National  Overview
  Volume, PB92-963253. See also PB91-921246. 64p.
  Subject index  keywords:  Hazardous materials,  Pollution
  control, Rhode Island,  Superfund, National  Priorities  List,
  Cleanup.

0264   National Priorities List Sites: Rhode Island, 1992
  Order Number PB93-963239CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Dec 92
  The publication  provides  general Superfund background in-
  formation and descriptions of activities at each State Nation-
  al Priorities List (NPL) site. It clearly describes what  the prob-
  lems are, what EPA and others participating in site  cleanups
  are doing,  and how the nation can move  ahead  in solving
  these serious  problems. Compiles site summary fact sheets
  on each State site being cleaned up under the Superfund
  Program.
                                                                                                                 45

-------
ADMINISTRATIVE & MANAGEMENT: Special Reports
  Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
  posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
  and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
  paper copy or microfiche. Also available as a package con-
  taining 49 NPL Sites, PB93-963250. 72p.
  Subject  Index keywords: Hazardous materials,  Pollution
  control,  Rhode Island, Superfund, National  Priorities List,
  Cleanup.

0265  National Priorities List Sites Set (1991)
  Order Number PB92-963253CDH, price: PC$750.00
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Emergency and Remedial Response; 1991
  The publications provide  general Superfund background in-
  formation and descriptions of activities at each State Nation-
  al Priorities List (NPL)  site. The report clearly describes what
  the problems are, what EPA and others participating in Site
  Cleanups are doing, and how the Nation can move ahead in
  solving  these serious problems. (The overview document,
  Superfund:  Focusing on the Nation at  Large (1991), available
  separately order as PB92-953252).
  Specifications: The overview document, Superfund:  Focus-
  ing  on the Nation at  Large (1991), available separately as
  PB92-953252. Set  includes  PB92-963204  through   PB92-
  963251. See also PB91-238725. 4486p-in 49v.
  Subject  index keywords: Hazardous materials,  Pollution
  control,  Superfund, National Priorities List.

0266  National Priorities List Sites: South Carolina
  Order Number PB91-921247CDH, price: PC A05/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 90
  Together with the companion  National Overview volume this
  publication  provides general Superfund background informa-
  tion and descriptions of activities at each State National Pri-
  orities List  (NPL) site. The document is intended to clearly
  describe what the problems are, what EPA  and  others par-
  ticipating in site cleanups are doing, and how the Nation can
  move ahead in solving these serious problems. The State
  volume  compiles site summary fact  sheets on  each State
  site being cleaned up under the Superfund program.
  Specifications: Paper copy available  on Standing Order, de-
  posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada
  and Mexico; all others $400).  Single copies also  available in
  paper copy or microfiche. 78p.
  Subject index  keywords: Hazardous materials, Pollution
  control, South Carolina, Superfund, Cleanup.
0267  National Priorities List Sites: South Carolina
  Order Number PB92-96321OCDH, price: PC A05/MF A01
  Environmental Protection  Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 91
  Together with the companion  national overview  volume the
  publication provides general Superfund background informa-
  tion and descriptions of activities at each State National Pri-
  orities List  (NPL)  site. The report clearly describes what the
  problems are,  what  EPA and others participating  in  site
  cleanups are doing, and  how the nation can move ahead in
  solving  these serious  problems. Also  included are sites sum-
  mary fact sheets on each State site being cleaned up under
  the Superfund program.
  Specifications:  Available on  Standing Order, deposit ac-
  count required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,  and
  Mexico;  all others $400). Single  copies also available in
  paper copy or microfiche. Also available as a package con-
  taining 49  NPL  Sites Volumes and  1 National  Overview
  Volume, PB92-963253. See also PB91-921247. 87p.
  Subject index  keywords:  Hazardous  materials,  Pollution
  control,  South  Carolina,  Superfund, National  Priorities List,
  Cleanup.
0268  National Priorities List Sites: South Carolina, 1992
  Order Number PB93-963240CDH, price: PC A05/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Dec 92
  The publication provides general  Superfund background in-
  formation and descriptions of activities at each State Nation-
  al Priorities List (NPL) site. It clearly describes what the prob-
  lems are, what EPA and others participating in site cleanups
  are doing, and how the nation can move ahead in solving
  these serious problems.  Compiles  site summary fact sheets
  on each State site  being cleaned up under the Superfund
  Program.
  Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order,  de-
  posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
  and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
  paper copy or  microfiche. Also available as a package con-
  taining 49  NPL Sites, PB93-963250. 94p.
  Subject index keywords:  Hazardous  materials,  Pollution
  control,  South  Carolina, Superfund,  National  Priorities  List,
  Cleanup.
0269  National Priorities List Sites: Tennessee
  Order Number PB91-921248CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 90
  Together with the companion National Overview volume this
  publication provides general Superfund background informa-
  tion and descriptions of activities at each State National  Pri-
  orities List (NPL)  site.'The document is intended to clearly
  describe what  the problems are, what EPA and others par-
  ticipating in site cleanups are doing, and how the Nation can
  move ahead in solving  these serious  problems. The State
  volume  compiles  site summary fact sheets on each State
  site being  cleaned up under the Superfund program.
  Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
  posit  account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada
  and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
  paper copy or microfiches. 61 p.
  Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials,  Pollution
  control, Tennessee, Superfund, Cleanup.

0270  National Priorities List Sites: Tennessee
  Order Number PB92-96JI225CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
  Environmental  Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 91
  Together  with  the companion national overview volume the
  publication provides general Superfund background informa-
  tion and descriptions of activities at each State National Pri-
  orities List (NPL)  site. The report clearly describes what the
  problems  are, what EPA and  others  participating  in  site
  cleanups  are doing, and how the nation can move ahead in
  solving  these serious problems. Also included are sites sum-
  mary fact sheets  on each State site being cleaned up under
  the Superfund  program.
  Specifications:  Available  on Standing Order, deposit  ac-
  count required  (minimum deposit $200  U.S.,  Canada,  and
 46

-------
                                                                      ADMINISTRATIVE & MANAGEMENT: Special
                                                                                                            Reports
   Mexico;  all others $400).  Single  copies  also  available  in
   paper copy or microfiche. Also available as a package con-
   taining 49  NPL Sites Volumes and  1 National  Overview
   Volume, PB92-963253. See also PB91-921248. 69p.
   Subject index  keywords:  Hazardous  materials,  Pollution
   control,  Tennessee,  Superfund,  National  Priorities  List,
   Cleanup.

 0271  National Priorities List Sites: Tennessee, 1992
   Order Number PB93-963241CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
   Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
   Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Dec 92
   The publication  provides general Superfund background  in-
   formation and descriptions of activities at each State Nation-
   al Priorities List (NPL)  site. It clearly describes what the prob-
   lems are, what EPA and others participating in site cleanups
   are doing, and  how the  nation  can move ahead in solving
   these serious problems. Compiles site summary fact sheets
   on each State  site being cleaned  up under the Superfund
   Program.
   Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
   posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
   and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available  in
   paper copy  or microfiche. Also available as a package con-
   taining 49 NPL Sites, PB93-963250. 74p.
   Subject  index  keywords:  Hazardous materials, Pollution
   control,  Tennessee,  Superfund,   National  Priorities  List,
   Cleanup.

0272  National Priorities List Sites: Texas
   Order Number PB91-921249CDH, price: PC A05/MF AOi
   Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
   Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 90
   Together with the companion National  Overview volume this
   publication provides general  Superfund background informa-
   tion and descriptions of activities at each State National Pri-
   orities List (NPL) site. The  document is intended to clearly
   describe  what the  problems  are,  what EPA and others par-
  ticipating in site cleanups are doing, and how the Nation can
   move ahead in solving these serious  problems. The State
  volume compiles site  summary  fact sheets on  each State
  site being cleaned up under the Superfund program.
  Specifications:  Paper  copy available on Standing Order, de-
  posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada
  and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
  paper copy or microfiche. 92p.
  Subject  index  keywords:  Hazardous materials,  Pollution
  control, Texas, Superfund, Cleanup.
0273  National Priorities List Sites: Texas
  Order Number PB92-963212CDH, price: PC A06/MF A02
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 91
  Together with the companion national  overview volume the
  publication provides general Superfund background informa-
  tion and descriptions of activities at each State National Pri-
  orities List (NPL) site. The report clearly describes what the
  problems  are, what EPA and others  participating in  site
  cleanups are doing, and how the nation can move ahead  in
  solving these serious problems. Also included are sites sum-
  mary fact sheets on each State site being cleaned up under
  the Superfund program.
  Specifications:  Available on Standing Order,  deposit ac-
  count required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,  and
   Mexico;  all others $400).  Single  copies  also  available  in
   paper copy or microfiche. Also available as a package con-
   taining 49  NPL Sites Volumes and  1 National  Overview
   Volume, PB92-963253. See also PB91-921249. 102p.
   Subject index  keywords:  Hazardous  materials,  Pollution
   control, Texas, Superfund, National Priorities List, Cleanup.

 0274  National Priorities List Sites: Texas,  1992
   Order Number PB93-963242CDH, price: PC A06/MF A02
   Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
   Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Dec 92
   The publication  provides general Superfund background in-
   formation and descriptions of activities at each State Nation-
   al Priorities List (NPL) site. It clearly describes what the prob-
   lems are, what  EPA and others participating in site cleanups
   are doing, and  how  the  nation  can move  ahead in solving
   these  serious problems. Compiles site summary fact sheets
   on each State  site being cleaned  up under the Superfund
   Program.
   Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
   posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
   and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available  in
   paper  copy  or microfiche. Also available as a package con-
   taining 49 NPL Sites, PB93-963250. 106p.
   Subject  index  keywords:  Hazardous materials, Pollution
   control, Texas, Superfund, National Priorities List, Cleanup.

 0275  National Priorities List Sites: The United States
   Territories, 1992
   Order Number PB93-963203CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
   Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
   Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Dec 92
   The publication provides  general Superfund  background in-
   formation and descriptions of activities  at each State Nation-
   al Priorities List  (NPL) site. It clearly describes what the prob-
   lems are, what EPA and others participating in site cleanups
   are doing, and  how the nation can move  ahead in solving
   these serious problems. Compiles site  summary fact sheets
   on  each State site being cleaned  up  under the Superfund
   Program.
  Specifications:  Paper copy  available on Standing Order, de-
  posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
  and Mexico; all  others $400). Single copies also available in
  paper copy or microfiche. Also available as a package con-
  taining 49 NPL Sites, PB93-963250.  52p.
  Subject  index  keywords:   Hazardous materials,  Pollution
  control, American Samoa, Guam, Trust  territories, Superfund,
  National Priorities List, Cleanup.

0276   National Priorities List Sites: Utah
  Order Number PB91-921250CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Emergency and  Remedial  Response; Sep 90
  Together with the companion National Overview volume this
  publication provides general Superfund background informa-
  tion and descriptions of activities at each State National Pri-
  orities'List (NPL) site. The document is intended to clearly
  describe what the problems are, what  EPA  and  others par-
  ticipating in site cleanups are doing, and how the Nation can
  move ahead  in  solving these serious  problems. The  State
  volume compiles site  summary fact sheets on each  State
  site being cleaned up under the Superfund program.
                                                                                                                 47

-------
ADMINISTRATIVE & MANAGEMENT: Special Reports
  Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
  posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada
  and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
  paper copy or microfiche. 54p.
  Subject  index keywords: Hazardous materials,  Pollution
  control, Utah, Superfund, Cleanup.
0277 National Priorities List Sites: Utah
  Order Number PB92-963215CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
  Environmental  Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 91
  Together with  the companion national overview volume the
  publication provides general Superfund background  informa-
  tion and descriptions of activities at each State National Pri-
  orities  List (NPL) site. The report clearly describes what the
  problems  are,  what EPA  and  others participating in  site
  cleanups are doing, and how the nation can  move ahead in
  solving these serious problems. Also included are sites sum-
  mary fact sheets on each  State site being cleaned up under
  the Superfund  program.
  Specifications: Available  on Standing  Order,  deposit ac-
  count  required (minimum  deposit $200 U.S., Canada,  and
  Mexico; all others  $400).  Single copies also  available in
  paper  copy or microfiche.  Also available as a package con-
  taining 49 NPL Sites Volumes and  1 National  Overview
  Volume, PB92-963253. See also PB91-921250. 63p.
  Subject  Index keywords: Hazardous  materials,  Pollution
  control, Utah, Superfund, National Priorities List, Cleanup.
0278  National  Priorities List Sites: Utah, 1992
  Order  Number PB93-963243CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Dec 92
  The publication provides general Superfund  background in-
  formation and descriptions of activities at each State Nation-
  al Priorities List (NPL) site. It clearly describes what the prob-
  lems are, what EPA and others participating  in site cleanups
  are doing, and how the nation can move ahead in solving
  these  serious  problems. Compiles site summary fact sheets
  on each  State site being cleaned up  under the Superfund
  Program.
  Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
  posit account  required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
  and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
  paper copy or microfiche. Also available as  a package con-
  taining 49 NPL Sites, PB93-963250. 64p.
  Subject  Index keywords: Hazardous materials,  Pollution
  control, Utah,  Superfund, National Priorities List, Cleanup.
 0279  National Priorities List Sites: Vermont
   Order Number PB91-921251CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
   Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
   Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 90
  Together with the companion National Overview volume this
   publication provides general Superfund background informa-
   tion and descriptions of activities at each State National Pri-
   orities List (NPL) site. The document is intended to clearly
   describe  what the problems are, what EPA  and others par-
   ticipating in site cleanups are doing, and how the Nation can
   move ahead  in solving these serious problems. The State
   volume  compiles  site summary fact  sheets on each State
   site being cleaned up under the Superfund program.
   Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
   posit  account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada
  and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
  paper copy or microfiche. 45p.
  Subject index  keywords:  Hazardous  materials,  Pollution
  control, Vermont, Superfund, Cleanup.

0280  National Priorities List Sites: Vermont
  Order Number PB92-963231CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 91
  Together with the companion national overview volume  the
  publication provides general Superfund background informa-
  tion and descriptions of activities at each State National  Pri-
  orities List (NPL) site. The report clearly describes what  the
  problems  are, what EPA  and  others participating in  site
  cleanups are doing, and how the nation can move ahead in
  solving these serious problems. Also included are sites sum-
  mary fact  sheets on each State  site being cleaned up under
  the Superfund program.
  Specifications: Available on Standing  Order,  deposit  ac-
  count required (minimum deposit $200  U.S., Canada,  and
  Mexico; all others  $400).  Single copies also  available in
  paper copy or microfiche. Also available  as  a package con-
  taining 49 NPL  Sites Volumes and 1  National  Overview
  Volume, PB92-963253. See also PB91-921251. 57p.
  Subject  index keywords:  Hazardous  materials, Pollution
  control, Vermont, Superfund,  National Priorities List, Cleanup.

0281   National Priorities List Sites: Vermont, 1992
  Order Number PB93-963244CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Solid Waste and  Emergency Response; Dec  92
  The publication provides general  Superfund background in-
  formation  and descriptions of activities at each State Nation-
  al Priorities List (NPL) site. It  clearly describes what the prob-
  lems are,  what EPA and others  participating in site cleanups
  are doing, and how the nation  can move ahead in solving
  these serious problems. Compiles site summary fact sheets
  on each  State site being cleaned up under the Superfund
  Program.
  Specifications: Paper copy available on  Standing Order, de-
  posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
  and Mexico;  all others $400). Single copies  also available in
  paper copy or microfiche. Also  available as a package  con-
  taining 49 NPL Sites, PB93-963250. 58p.
  Subject  index  keywords:  Hazardous  materials, Pollution
  control, Vermont, Superfund, National Priorities List, Cleanup.

 0282  National Priorities List Sites: Virginia
  Order Number PB91-921252CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 90
  Together with the companion National Overview volume this
  publication provides general Superfund  background informa-
  tion and descriptions of activities at each State National Pri-
  orities List (NPL) site. The document is  intended to clearly
  describe  what the problems are, what EPA and others  par-
  ticipating  in site  cleanups are doing, and how the Nation can
   move ahead in  solving these serious problems. The State
  volume compiles site summary fact sheets on each State
   site being cleaned up under the Superfund program.
   Specifications:  Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
   posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada
 48

-------
                                                                       ADMINISTRATIVE & MANAGEMENT: Special
                                                                                                             Reports
    and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
    paper copy or microfiche. 75p.
    Subject index keywords:  Hazardous  materials,  Pollution
    control, Virginia, Superfund, Cleanup.

 0283  National Priorities List Sites: Virginia
    Order Number PB92-963217CDH, price: PC A05/MF A01
    Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
    Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 91
    Together with  the companion national overview volume the
    publication provides general  Superfund background informa-
    tion and descriptions of activities at each State National Pri-
    orities List (NPL) site. The report clearly describes what the
   problems are, what EPA and  others  participating  in  site
   cleanups are doing, and  how the nation can move ahead in
   solving these serious problems. Also included are sites sum-
   mary fact sheets on each State site being cleaned up under
   the Superfund program.
   Specifications: Available  on Standing Order, deposit  ac-
   count required (minimum deposit $200 U.S.,  Canada and
   Mexico;  all others $400). Single copies also available in
   paper copy or  microfiche. Also available as a  package con-
   taining 49 NPL Sites Volumes  and 1  National Overview
   Volume, PB92-963253. See also PB91-921252. 83p.
   Subject index  keywords: Hazardous  materials,  Pollution
   control, Virginia, Superfund, National  Priorities  List, Cleanup.
 0284  National Priorities List Sites: Virginia, 1992
   Order Number PB93-963245CDH, price: PC A05/MF A01
   Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
   Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Dec 92
   The publication provides  general  Superfund background in-
   formation and descriptions of activities at each  State Nation-
   al Priorities List (NPL) site. It clearly describes what the prob-
   lems are, what  EPA and others participating in  site cleanups
   are doing, and how  the nation can move ahead in solving
   these serious problems. Compiles site summary fact sheets
   on each State  site being  cleaned up under the Superfund
   Program.                                        K
   Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
   posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada
   and Mexico; all  others $400).  Single copies also available in
   paper copy or microfiche. Also available as a packaqe con-
  taining 49 NPL Sites, PB93-963250. 92p.
  Subject  index  keywords: Hazardous materials, Pollution
  control, Virginia, Superfund, National Priorities List, Cleanup.
0285 National Priorities List Sites: Washington
  Order Number PB91-921253CDH,  price: PC A07/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Emergency and  Remedial Response; Sep 90
  Together with the companion National  Overview volume this
  publication provides general Superfund background informa-
  tion and descriptions  of activities at each State  National Pri-
  orities List (NPL) site. The document is intended to clearly
  describe what the problems are, what EPA and others par-
  ticipating  in site cleanups are doing, and how the Nation can
  move  ahead in  solving these serious  problems. The State
 volume compiles site summary fact sheets on each  State
 site being cleaned up  under the Superfund program.
 Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order de-
 posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada
 and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available  in
 paper copy or microfiche. 130p.
   Subject index  keywords:  Hazardous  materials,  Pollution
   control, Washington(State), Superfund, Cleanup.

 0286  National Priorities List Sites: Washington
   Order Number PB92-963244CDH, price: PC A07/MF A02
   Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
   Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 91
   Together with the  companion national overview volume the
   publication provides general  Superfund background informa-
   tion and descriptions of activities at each State National Pri-
   orities List (NPL) site. The report clearly describes what the
   problems  are, what EPA and  others participating  in  site
   cleanups are doing, and how the nation  can move ahead in
   solving these serious problems. Also included are sites sum-
   mary fact sheets on each State site being cleaned up under
   the Superfund program.
   Specifications: Available  on Standing  Order, deposit  ac-
   count required (minimum deposit $200  U.S.,  Canada, and
   Mexico;  all  others $400). Single copies also available in
   paper copy or microfiche. Also available as a  package con-
   taining  49  NPL  Sites  Volumes  and  1  National Overview
   Volume, PB92-963253. See also PB91-921253. 139p.
   Subject index  keywords: Hazardous materials, Pollution
   control,  Washington(State),  Superfund,  National  Priorities
   List, Cleanup.

 0287  National Priorities List Sites: Washington, 1992
   Order Number PB93-963246CDH, price: PC A08/MF A02
   Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
   Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Dec 92
   The publication provides general  Superfund  background in-
   formation and descriptions of activities at each  State Nation-
   al Priorities List (NPL) site. It clearly describes what the prob-
   lems are, what EPA and others participating in  site cleanups
   are doing,  and how the nation can move ahead  in solving
   these serious problems. Compiles site summary fact sheets
   on each State site being cleaned up under the Superfund
   Program.
   Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
   posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
   and Mexico; all others $400).  Single copies also available in
   paper copy or microfiche. Also available as a package con-
  taining 49 NPL Sites, PB93-963250. 158p.
  Subject  index keywords: Hazardous materials,  Pollution
  control,  Washington(State),  Superfund,  National  Priorities
  List, Cleanup.

0288 National Priorities List Sites: West Virginia
  Order Number PB91-921254CDH, price:  PC A03/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Emergency  and Remedial Response; Sep 90
  Together with the  companion National Overview volume this
  publication provides  general Superfund background informa-
  tion and descriptions of activities at each State  National Pri-
  orities List (NPL) site. The document is intended to  clearly
  describe what the problems are, what EPA and others par-
  ticipating in  site cleanups are doing, and how the Nation can
  move  ahead in solving these serious problems. The  State
 volume compiles site summary fact sheets on each  State
 site being cleaned up under the Superfund program.
 Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
 posit account  required  (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada
                                                                                                                 49

-------
ADMINISTRATIVE & MANAGEMENT: Special Reports
  and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
  paper copy or microfiche. 39p.
  Subject  index keywords: Hazardous materials, Pollution
  control, West Virginia, Superfund, Cleanup.

0289  National Priorities List Sites: West Virginia
  Order Number PB92-963229CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 91
  Together with the companion national overview volume the
  publication provides general Superfund background  informa-
  tion and descriptions of activities at each State National Pri-
  orities List (NPL) site. The report clearly describes what the
  problems  are,  what EPA  and  others participating in  site
  cleanups are doing, and how the nation  can  move ahead in
  solving these serious problems.  Also included are sites sum-
  mary fact sheets on each State site being cleaned up under
  the Superfund program.
  Specifications: Available on Standing  Order,  deposit ac-
  count required (minimum  deposit  $200  U.S., Canada,  and
  Mexico;  all others  $400).  Single  copies also  available in
  paper copy or  microfiche. Also  available as a package con-
  taining 49  NPL Sites  Volumes and  1  National Overview
  Volume, PB92-963253. See also PB91-921254. 51 p.
  Subject  index keywords: Hazardous  materials,  Pollution
  control,  West  Virginia, Superfund, National  Priorities  List,
  Cleanup.
 0290  National Priorities List Sites: West Virginia, 1992
  Order Number PB93-963247CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
  Environmental  Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Dec 92
  The publication provides general Superfund background in-
  formation and descriptions of activities at each State Nation-
   al Priorities List (NPL) site.  It clearly describes what  the prob-
   lems are, what EPA and others participating  in site  cleanups
   are doing,  and how the nation can move ahead in solving
   these serious problems. Compiles site summary fact sheets
   on each  State site  being  cleaned up under the Superfund
   Program.
   Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
   posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
   and Mexico; all others  $400). Single copies also available in
   paper copy or microfiche.  Also available as  a package con-
   taining 49 NPL Sites, PB93-963250. 54p.
   Subject  Index keywords: Hazardous materials,  Pollution
   control,  West Virginia, Superfund, National Priorities List,
   Cleanup.
 0291   National Priorities List Sites: Wisconsin
   Order Number PB91-921255CDH, price: PC A06/MF A01
   Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC.  Office of
   Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 90
   Together with the companion National Overview volume this
   publication provides general Superfund  background informa-
   tion and descriptions of activities at each State National Pri-
   orities List (NPL) site. The document is intended  to clearly
   describe what the problems are, what  EPA and others par-
   ticipating in site cleanups are doing, and how the Nation can
   move ahead in  solving these  serious  problems. The State
   volume compiles site  summary fact  sheets on each State
   site being cleaned up under the Superfund program.
   Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
   posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada
  and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
  paper copy or microfiche, 117p.
  Subject index  keywords: Hazardous  materials,  Pollution
  control, Wisconsin, Superfund, Cleanup.

0292  National Priorities List Sites: Wisconsin
  Order Number PB92-963243CDH, price: PC A06/MF A02
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 91
  Together with the companion national overview volume  the
  publication provides general Superfund background informa-
  tion and descriptions of activities at each State National  Pri-
  orities List (NPL) site. The report clearly  describes what  the
  problems  are, what EPA and  others participating  in  site
  cleanups are  doing, and how the nation can move ahead in
  solving these serious problems. Also included are sites sum-
  mary  fact  sheets on each State  site being cleaned up under
  the Superfund program.
  Specifications: Available on Standing  Order,  deposit  ac-
  count required  (minimum  deposit $200  U.S.,  Canada,  and
  Mexico; all  others  $400). Single copies also  available in
  paper copy or microfiche. Also available  as a package con-
  taining 49 NPL Sites Volumes and 1  National  Overview
  Volume, PB92-963253. See also PB91-921255. 122p.
  Subject  index keywords:  Hazardous  materials, Pollution
  control, Wisconsin, Superfund, National Priorities List, Clean-
  up.
 0293  National Priorities List Sites: Wisconsin, 1992
  Order Number PB93-963248CDH, price: PC A07/MF A02
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Solid Waste and Emergency  Response; Dec 92
  The  publication provides general Superfund background in-
  formation and descriptions of activities at each State Nation-
  al Priorities List (NPL) site. It clearly describes what the prob-
  lems are, what EPA and others participating in site cleanups
  are doing, and how the nation can  move ahead  in solving
  these serious problems.  Compiles site summary fact sheets
  on each  State site  being cleaned up under the Superfund
   Program.
   Specifications: Paper copy  available on Standing Order, de-
   posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
   and  Mexico; all others $400). Single  copies also available in
   paper copy or microfiche. Also available as a package  con-
   taining 49 NPL Sites, PB93-963250. 127p.
   Subject  index keywords:   Hazardous  materials, Pollution
   control, Wisconsin, Superfund, National Priorities  List, Clean-
   up.
 0294  National Priorities! List Sites: Wyoming
   Order Number PB91-921256CDH, price:  PC A03/MF  A01
   Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
   Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 90
   Together with the companion National Overview volume this
   publication  provides general Superfund  background  informa-
   tion  and  descriptions of  activities at  each State National Pri-
   orities  List  (NPL)  site. The  document is intended to clearly
   describe what the problems are, what EPA and others par-
   ticipating in  site cleanups are doing,  and how the Nation can
   move ahead in solving  these  serious problems.  The  State
   volume compiles  site summary fact sheets on  each  State
   site  being cleaned up under the Superfund program.
  50

-------
                                                                      ADMINISTRATIVE & MANAGEMENT: Specia(
                                                                                                            Reports
    Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order de-
    posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada
    and Mexico;  all others $400). Single copies also available in
    paper copy or microfiche. 35p.
    Subject index keywords:  Hazardous materials, Pollution
    control, Wyoming, Super-fund, Cleanup.

  0295  National Priorities List Sites: Wyoming
    Order Number PB92-963238CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
    Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
    Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 91
    Together with the companion national  overview volume the
    publication provides general Superfund background informa-
    tion and descriptions of activities at each State National Pri-
    orities List  (NPL) site. The report clearly describes what the
    problems  are, what EPA and  others  participating in site
    cleanups are  doing,  and  how the nation can move ahead in
    solving these  serious problems. Also included are sites sum-
    mary fact sheets on each State site being cleaned up under
    the Superfund program.
    Specifications: Available on  Standing Order, deposit ac-
    count required (minimum deposit  $200 U.S., Canada  and
    Mexico; all others $400). Single  copies  also available in
   paper copy or microfiche. Also available as a package con-
   taining 49  NPL Sites Volumes and 1 National  Overview
   Volume, PB92-963253. See also PB91-921256. 47p.
   Subject index  keywords:  Hazardous  materials, Pollution
   control, Wyoming,  Superfund, National Priorities List, Clean-


 0296  National  Priorities List Sites: Wyoming, 1992
   Order Number PB93-963249CDH, price:  PC A03/MF A01
   Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC.  Office of
   Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Dec 92
   The publication provides  general Superfund background in-
   formation and  descriptions of activities at each State Nation-
   al Priorities List (NPL) site. It clearly describes what the prob-
   lems are, what EPA and others participating in site cleanups
   are doing, and how the nation can move  ahead  in solving
   these serious problems. Compiles site summary fact sheets
   on each State site being  cleaned  up under the Superfund
   Program.
   Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
   posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U S  Canada
   and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
   paper copy or  microfiche.  Also available as a package con-
   taining  49 NPL Sites, PB93-963250. 41 p.
  Subject  index keywords: Hazardous  materials,  Pollution
  control,  Wyoming, Superfund, National Priorities list Clean-
  up.                                      •(.-•

0297 National Priorities List Sites (1992)
  Order Number PB93-963250CDH, price: PC$700.00
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 1992
  Specifications:  Package  includes 49  NPL  Sites PB93-
  963201 through PB93-963249. 4835p-in 49v.
  0298  National Superfund Program Priorities, Fiscal Year
    1994
    Order Number PB94-963221CDH, price: PC A01/MF A01
    Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
    Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 31 Jan 94
    The memorandum provides the FY 1994 National Superfund
    Program Priorities for Regions and Headquarters. There are
    nine major  Superfund  priorities:  Accelerated Cleanup  and
    Emergency Response; Enforcement First; Enforcement Fair-
    ness; Military Base Closure; NPL Construction Completions;
    Contracts Management; Environmental Justice and Meaning-
   ful Community Involvement; Enhancement of State Role and
    Development of Deferral  Options; and Innovative Technol-
   ogies.
   Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
   posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S.,  Canada,
   and Mexico; all  others $400). Single copies also available in
   paper copy  or microfiche. 3p.
   Subject index keywords: Superfund, Hazardous materials,
   Waste management.

 0299  Progress Toward Implementing Superfund. Fiscal
   Year 1988
   Order Number PB90-249442CDH, price: PC A21/MF A03
   Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
   Emergency and Remedial Response; Apr 90
   The EPA's Annual Report includes the progress made by the
   Agency during Fiscal Year 1988 in implementin CERCLA (or
   Superfund),  as amended by the Superfund Amendments and
   Reauthorization Act (SARA) of 1986. The report provides an
   overall perspective  on  progress in 1988, and, in addition,
   also contains information that Congress specifically request-
   ed,  including a  detailed description  of  each of the  152
   Records  of Decision (RODs) that were signed in fiscal year
   1988; a report on the status of remedial  actions, including
   enforcement  activity, in  progress  at the end of the fiscal
   year;  and an evaluation of newly  developed feasible  and
  achievable permanent treatment technologies.
  Specifications: See also PB89-233548. 479p.
  Subject index keywords:  National government, Hazardous
  materials, Waste  disposal, Pollution control, Superfund.

0300  Progress Toward Implementing Superfund. Fiscal
  Year 1989
  Order Number PB91-921204CDH, price: PC A16/MF A02
  Environmental Protection  Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Emergency and Remedial Response; Dec 90
  The EPA's Annual Report includes the progress made by the
  Agency in implementing  the national hazardous waste law
  and its amendments (CERCLA and SARA). The reports pro-
  vide an overall perspective  on progress, contain information
  that Congress specifically requested, and an  evaluation  of
  newly developed  feasible and achieveable permanent treat-
  ment technologies.
  Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
  posit account required (minimum deposit $100 U.S., Canada,
  and  Mexico; all others $200). Single copies also available in
  paper  copy or microfiche.  Supersedes PB91-921201 See
  also PB90-249442. 369p.
  Subject index keywords: National government, Hazardous
  materials, Waste disposal, Pollution control, Superfund.
                                                                                                               51

-------
ADMINISTRATIVE & MANAGEMENT: Special Reports
0301  Progress Toward Implementing Superfund, Fiscal
  Year 1990: A Report to the Congress
  Order Number PB92-963256CDH, price: PC E05/MF A04
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Emergency and Remedial Response; Feb 92
  Section 301 (h)  of the Comprehensive Environmental Re-
  sponse, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA, or Super-
  fund), as amended by the  Superfund Amendments  and Re-
  authorization  Act  (SARA) of 1986, requires  the Agency to
  report annually on response activities and accomplishments,
  and to compare  remedial  and enforcement projects with
  those undertaken  in previous fiscal years. The Environmental
  Protection  Agency (EPA),  at  the  end of fiscal year  1990
  (FY90), was well  on its  way toward intensifying the Super-
  fund program. Its  accomplishments indicate the Agency's ac-
  celerated success in implementing the Superfund  program.
  The Agency aggressively seeks potentially responsible party
  (PRP) involvement at every site where PRPs are  identified.
  The Report  contains information  Congress specifically  re-
  quested in Section  301(h)(1),  including an abstract of each
  Record of  Decision  (ROD)  that was signed in FY90; a report
  on the  status of remedial actions,  including enforcement ac-
  tivity in progress at the end of the fiscal year; and an evalua-
  tion of newly developed feasible  and  achievable  treatment
  technologies; and a description of minority firm participation
   in Superfund contracts and efforts to encourage such partici-
   pation.
   Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
   posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
   and Mexico;  all others $400). Single copies  also available in
   paper copy or microfiche. 400p.
   Subject Index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
   Hazardous materials, Pollution regulations.
 0302  Progress Toward  Implementing Superfund,  Fiscal
   Year 1991. Report to Congress
   Order Number PB94-963234CDH, price: PC A22/MF A04
   Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
   Emergency and Remedial  Response; Feb 94
   The Environmental  Protection Agency (EPA) continued  its
   progress in protecting public health, welfare, and the environ-
   ment through  the  Superfund program in fiscal year 1991
   (FY91). As it completed the  eleventh year of the program,
   the Agency  reported clean-up work progress or completion
   at 93  percent of the 1,207  sites on  the National Priorities
   List. The FY91 accomplishments reflect activities initiated by
   the 30-Day Task Force  and continued success in implement-
   ing A  Management Review of the  Superfund Program  (the
   FY89 90-Day Study) (PB90-153883).
   Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing  Order, de-
   posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
   and Mexico; all others  $400). Single copies also available in
   paper copy or microfiche.  522p.
   Subject Index keywords: Superfund, Hazardous materials,
   Waste management.
  0303  RCRA, Superfund Monthly Hot  Line Reports
    Order Number PB92-922400CDH, price: Subscription, call for
    price
    Environmental Protection  Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
    Solid Waste; 1992
    The RCRA/SF Hotline quickly responds to questions related
    to the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA), the
    comprehensive  Environmental Response, Compensation and
 Liability  Act  (CERCLA), Underground Storage Tanks (UST)
 program, the Superfund Amendments  Reauthorization Act
 (SARA)  and the Chemical emergency Preparedness (CEPP)
 Community Right-to-know Act/Title III program. The hotline is
 the mechanism for EPA's response to inquiries  from the
 public and regulated community; the referral  point  for docu-
 ment availability; the dissemination of changing information;
 and  the primary means for answering factual questions on
 EPA regulations and  policies. The Monthly Hotline Reports
 contain  questions posed by the callers  that were either sig-
 nificant  and  required the EPA to resolve the issues or were
 the  most  frequently asked questions. Also included in  the
 Reports are the  Federal Register  summaries, publications
 availabilities, and call statistics.
 Specifications: Available on  subscription, U.S., Canada, and
 Mexico  price $96.00; price for others $192.00. Also available
 individually.  Back  year sets and indexes are available to
 1982. 12 issues.
 Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Government
 policies, Law(Jurisprudence), Pollution abatement,  Periodi-
 cals, Superfund.
0304  SARA (Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization
 Act) Section 313 Roadmaps Data Base. User's Manual.
 Version 2.10
  Order Number PB90-174855CDH, price: PC A05/MF A01
  IGF Inc  Fairfax, VA.; Environmental Protection Agency,
  Washington, DC. Office of Toxic Substances; 14 Jul 89
  EPA has  developed a database of sources of information on
  the chemicals listed in section 313 of the Superfund Amend-
  ments and  Reauthorization Act (SARA). The database is in-
  tended to assist users of section  313 Toxic Release  Invento-
  ry data to perform exposure and risk assessments of these
  chemicals. The Roadmaps system  displays and/or prints in-
  formation for the SARA section 313 chemicals on  health and
  environmental  effects, Federal regulation, and state air and
  water regulations, monitoring data, and state contacts.
  Specifications:  For system on diskettes, see PB90-501487.
  See also PB90-501479. Sponsored by Environmental Protec-
  tion Agency, Washington, DC. Office  of  Toxic Substances.
  87p.
  Subject index keywords: Exposure, Risk, Toxic substances.

 0305  Smart Moves in Superfund - Regional Initiatives.
  Volume  1, Number 1, February 1992
  Order Number PB92-963272CDH, price: PC A01/MF A01
   Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
   Emergency and Remedial Response; Feb 92
   The bulletin serves as an exchange for Regional  information
   in Superfund. The issue has the following contents: region 6
   to cut time between NF'L listing and design; region 4 encour-
   ages PRPs to start remedial designs before consent decree;
   region 3 eliminates statement of work; suggestion box; revi-
   talization team meets on potential pilots; and voice of the re-
   gions.
   Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
   posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
   and Mexico; all  others $400). Single copies also  available in
   paper copy or microfiche. 4p.
   Subject index  keywords: Superfund, Waste  management,
   Hazardous materials, Office of Solid Waste and  Emergency
   Response.
  52

-------
                                                                      ADMINISTRATIVE & MANAGEMENT: Special
                                                                                                           Reports
 0306  Smart Moves in Superfund - Regional Pilots and
   hiitiatives. Volume 1, Number 2, September  1992
   Order Number PB93-963283CDH,  price: PC A01/MF A01
   o  rl^?,"10"*3' Protection Agency,  Washington, DC. Office of
   bolid Waste and Emergency Response; Sep 92
   The  issue of  the Smart  Moves in Superfund  bulletin series
   highlights regional pilots and initiatives to streamline cleanup
   through the Superfund Accelerated Cleanup Model.
   Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order de-
   posit account  required (minimum deposit $200  U.S Canada
   and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
   paper copy or microfiche. 4p.
   Subject index keywords: Waste management, Superfund
   Hazardous materials, Superfund Accelerated Cleanup Model!

 0307  Smart Moves in Superfund - Revitalization One Year
   Later. Volume 1, Number 3, January 1993
   Order Number PB93-963284CDH, price: PC A01/MF A01
   Environmental Protection Agency, Washington,  DC. Office of
   bond Waste and Emergency Response; Jan 93
   The issue  of the  Smart Moves in Superfund bulletin series
   provides an update on the realization effort, highlighting
   National Prionties  List (NPL) construction completions, accel-
   erating  cleanup, the Superfund Accelerated Cleanup Model
   risk assessment/risk management, contracts  management'
   enforcement policy/equity, interagency cooperation,  public
   forms, and  state meetings.
   Specifications: Paper  copy available on Standing Order de-
   posit account required  (minimum deposit $200 U.S. Canada
  and Mexico; all others  $400). Single copies also available in
  paper copy or microfiche. 4p.
  Subject index keywords: Superfund,  Waste management
  Hazardous  materials, Office of Solid  Waste and Emergency
  Response.                                            *

0308  Some  Major Factors important in Establishing Land
  Use Policy for Remediated Superfund Sites
  Order Number PB90-256686CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
  Georgia Univ., Athens.;  Environmental Protection Agency
  Washington, DC. Office of Cooperative Environmental
  Management; Dec  89
  The report is part of the National Network for Environmental
  Management Studies under the auspices of the Office of Co-
  operative Environmental Management of the U.S  Environ-
  mental Protection Agency.  No explicit federal policy address-
  es future land use of remediated Superfund sites. The EPA
  has no official land use  policy for these sites and most states
  have no mechanisms for identifying uncontrolled hazardous
 waste  sites, and no policies or procedures  for guiding  rede-
 velopment of remediated sites. Historically, land  use  deci-
 sions have been made by local governments. However  local
 governments are subject to political pressures which impact
 land use decisions,  and may override  environmental  and
 health  concerns. Thus, federal and state participation is vital
 in devising land  use controls. In the absence of formal policy
 a variety of factors impact  land use decisions. Four general
 concerns are scientific  uncertainty and technological limita-
 tions, cleanup standards and  risk assessment,  institutional
 controls,  and liability for remediation costs.  The report con-
 c udes  that the principal goal of land use policy should be to
 allow the most effective allocation and utilization  of available
 resources to meet the legislative purpose of  health and  envi-
 ronmental protection. Various possible land use policy objec-
 tives are proposed.                                   J
    Specifications:   Sponsored  by  Environmental  Protection
    Agency, Washington, DC. Office of Cooperative Environmen-
    tal Management. 54p.
    Subject index keywords:  Land use, Hazardous materials,
    Waste  disposal,  Law(Jurisprudence),  Superfund, Remedial
    action.

  0309  Status of Regional Superfund Pilots: End-of-Year
    Report
    Order Number PB94-963216CDH, price: PC A07/MF A02
    Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
    Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Dec 93
    In 1991 and 1992, the Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
    Response (OSWER)  began major efforts to streamline and
    accelerate Superfund response activities. In a statement on
    October 2, 1991, the  USEPA Administrator approved the Su-
    perfund 30-Day Task  Force Implementation Plan (October 1,
    1991) which identified aggressive cleanup targets and strate-
    gies for streamlining and 'revitalizing' the Superfund process
    Following this  Introduction, Part II of the  report contains an
    index of pilot activities and key contacts; Part III provides ab-
    stracts on each pilot; and Part IV describes  in detail the
   goals of each pilot, its status, evaluation plan, and results to
   date.

   Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
   posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
   and Mexico;  all others $400). Single copies also available in
   paper copy or microfiche. 133p.
   Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management
   Hazardous materials.

 0310  Superfund Administrative Improvements. Executive
   Summary
   Order Number PB93-963294CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
   Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
   Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 23 Jun 93
   The report focuses on administrative  improvements  to the
   Superfund program  suggested by the Superfund  Administra-
   tive  Improvements Task Force. Specific topics include en-
   hancing  enforcement fairness  and   reducing   transaction
   costs; enhancing cleanup effectiveness and consistency; en-
   hancing meaningful public involvement; and enhancing the
   state role in the Superfund program.
   Specifications:  Paper  copy available on Standing Order, de-
   posit account required  (minimum deposit $225 U.S., Canada,
   and  Mexico; all  others  $450). Single copies also available in
   paper copy or microfiche. See also PB93-963295.  19p.
  Subject index keywords: Superfund, Hazardous materials,
  Waste disposal.

0311   Superfund Administrative Improvements. Final
  Report
  Order Number PB93-963295CDH, price:  PC A04/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 23 Jun 93
  The  report focuses  on administrative improvements to  the
  Superfund program  suggested by the Superfund  Administra-
  tive Improvements Task  Force.  Specific topics include  en-
  hancing enforcement  fairness  and reducing  transaction
  costs; enhancing cleanup effectiveness and consistency;  en-
  hancing meaningful public involvement; and enhancing  the
  state role in the Superfund program.
                                                                                                              53

-------
ADMINISTRATIVE & MANAGEMENT: Special Reports
  Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
  posit account required (minimum deposit $225 U.S., Canada,
  and Mexico; all others $450). Single copies also available in
  paper copy or microfiche. See also PB93-963294. 54p.
  Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste disposal, Haz-
  ardous materials.
0312  Superfund Administrative Improvements:
  Reinventing Superfund
  Order Number PB94-963210CDH, price: PC A01/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Nov 93
  The Superfund Administrative Improvements initiatives are a
  comprehensive package  of administrative changes designed
  to make significant improvements to the Superfund program
  prior to Superfund reauthorization. Announced in June 1993,
  these initiatives have had an immediate impact on improving
  the pace, cost and fairness of Superfund. The fact sheet de-
  scribes the themes, background  and  each initiative of the
  Administrative Improvements effort. The fact sheet also de-
  scribes major activities which  have been completed during
  the  first three months of implementation, as well as those
  that are currently  underway and planned to be  completed
  over the next 12 months.
  Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
   posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
   and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available  in
   paper copy or microfiche. 4p.
   Subject index keywords: Superfund,  Pollution regulations,
   Administrative procedures.
 0313  Superfund Emergency Response Actions:  A
   Summary of Federally-Funded Removals. Fifth  Annual
   Report - Fiscal Year 1990
   Order Number PB92-963403CDH, price: PC A08/MF A02
   Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
   Emergency and Remedial Response; Oct 91
   The Superfund removal  program has achieved significant ac-
   complishments in  responding to environmental emergencies,
   cleaning up hazardous  waste  sites, and making  sites safe.
   For this reason, EPA publishes the  Superfund  Emergency
   Response Actions summary, which provides the public with
   valuable information about Superfund removal actions under-
   taken by EPA. This document is updated annually. The Fifth
   Annual Report, which is the fourth update to the  initial docu-
   ment, summarizes the Superfund removal actions completed
   by EPA between October 1989 and September 1990.
   Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
    posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
    and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
    paper copy or microfiche. See also PB90-921260. 159p.
    Subject index keywords: Superfund,  Hazardous materials,
    Emergency planning, Remedial action, Waste management,
    Emergency Response Program, Remedial response.
  0314 Superfund Emergency Response Actions: A
    Summary of Federally Funded Removals. Fourth Annual
    Report - Fiscal Year 1989
    Order Number PB91-921260CDH, price: PC A07/MF A01
    Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office  of
    Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 90
    Summarizes short-term actions  (removals) undertaken  by
    EPA and the U.S. Coast Guard in response to hazardous
    substance incidents. The documents present an  historical
  perspective of the program and summarize removal actions
  taken.
  Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
  posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
  and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
  paper copy or microfiche. 130p.
  Subject index keywords: Superfund, Emergency  planning,
  Hazardous materials, Waste management,  Remedial  re-
  sponse.
0315  Superfund Emergency Response Actions: A
  Summary of Federally-Funded Removals. Sixth Annual
  Report, Fiscal Year 1991
  Order Number PB92-963421CDH, price: PC A09/MF A02
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC.  Office of
  Emergency and Remedial Response; Oct 92
  The Superfund removal program has achieved significant ac-
  complishments in responding to environmental emergencies,
  cleaning up  hazardous waste sites, and  making sites safe.
  For this reason,  EPA publishes  the Superfund Emergency
  Response Actions summary, which provides the public with
  valuable information about Superfund removal actions under-
  taken by EPA. This document is updated  annually.  The Sixth
  Annual Report, which is the fifth update  to the initial docu-
  ment, summarizes the Superfund removal actions completed
  by EPA between October 1990 and September 1991.
  Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
  posit account required (minimum  deposit  $200 U.S., Canada,
  and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
  paper  copy or microfiche. See also PB92-963403. 192p.
  Subject index keywords: Superfund, Emergency planning,
  Public information, Hazardous materials, Waste management,
   Remedial action.
 0316  Superfund Emergency Response Actions: A
   Summary of Federally-Funded Removals. Volume 1
   Order Number PB90-197310CDH, price: PC A10/MF A02
   Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
   Emergency  and Remedial Response; May 87
   The document is a summary of short-term actions (removals)
   undertaken  by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and
   the U S  Coast Guard in response to hazardous substance
   incidents. The document presents a historical perspective of
   the program, summarizing  short-term  actions  completed
   during the five-year  authorized funding period of the Compre-
   hensive Environmental  Response, Compensation  and Liabil-
   ity Act (CERCLA), December 11, 1980, through  September
   30 1985 and those actions taken during October 1,  1985
   through September 30, 1986 that were funded primarily by
   two special appropriations from Congress.  The Superfund
   Emergency Response Actions summary  is the first document
   to be published aggregating short-term response  information
   for all six years. As the Superfund removal program contin-
   ues, EPA intends to publish annual updates of the document.
   Specifications: See also Volume 2, PB90-197328. 196p.
   Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials,  Waste dis-
   posal, History, Removal, Superfund program, Remedial  ac-
   tions.
   54

-------
                                                                      ADMINISTRATIVE & MANAGEMENT: Special
                                                                                                           Reports
  0317  Superfund Emergency Response Actions: A
    Summary of Federally-Funded Removals. Volume 2
    Order Number PB90-197328CDH, price: PC A06/MF A01
    Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC Office of
    Emergency and Remedial Response; Jun 88
    Serves as the second annual report for public use on short-
    rQ?« reTya aCt'°ns undertaken by EPA between October
    i a«6 and June 1988.

    Specifications:  See also Volume 1, PB90-197310. 11 Op.
    Subject  index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste dis-
    posal, History, Removal, Superfund  program, Remedial ac-


 0318  Superfund Emergency Response Actions- A
   Summary of Federally Funded Removals. Volume 3
   Order Number PB90-214354CDH, price: PC A06/MF A01
   Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
   faolid Waste and Emergency Response; Jun 89
   Volume III summarizes short-term removal activities complet-
   ed during the eighth year of the Superfund program  The
   document is presented as a series of matrices that are orga-
   nized numerically by Region and  alphabetically by State and
   fn nrmT with!n,fach Re9ion- "  contains the same types  of
   nformation included in Volume I and II.  EPA intends to con-
   tinue providing the information in future updates. Inquiries re-
   garding information contained in the document should be re-
   ferred to the appropriate EPA Regional  office. A list of EPA
   Snnaand  **"?? delineatin9 the  States within each
   Region are provided in the report. In addition, the document
   includes a listing  of sites found in Volumes I and II  These
   sites are  listed alphabetically by State within their respective
   Regions.  In the back of the report, there is also an alphabeti-
   cal index of all sites in Volumes I,  II, and III.
   Specifications:  See also PB90-197310.  125p.

  S*]ew, "J016,*  keywords:  Hazardous materials,  Site sur-
  veys, Waste disposal, Superfund  program, Remedial action,
  Emergency plans, Cleanup operations, Land  pollution con-
  trol, Waste management.

0319  Superfund: EPA/ICMA Superfund Revitalization
  Conference. Held in Chicago, Illinois on November 12-13,

  Order Number PB93-963274CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Solid Waste and  Emergency Response; Apr 93
  The summary report outlines the comments made by the in-
  troductory  speakers as well as the conclusions drawn from
 the  group  discussions. The report highlights those  recom-
 mendations that were strongly endorsed  by a large number
 ri fffo t      The ?POrt also identifies P°ints on which the
 different groups could not reach consensus.
 Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order de-
 posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U S  Canada
 and  Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
 paper copy or microfiche. 52p.
 Subject index keywords: Superfund, Hazardous materials
 Waste management, Meetings.
   0320  Superfund: EPA/ICMA Superfund Revitalization
     Conference. Held in San Francisco, California on
     February 1-2, 1993
     Order Number PB94-963202CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
     Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
     bolid Waste and Emergency Response; Oct 93
     The report summarizes comments from the regional confer-
     ence held in San Francisco in  February 1993 on  improvinq
     the Superfund program.
     Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order de-
     posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U S Canada
    and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
    paper copy or microfiche. 52p.
    Subject index keywords: Superfund,  Hazardous materials
    Waste management,  Meetings.

  0321  SUPERFUND: Focusing on the Nation at Large. A
    Decade of Progress at National Priorities List Sites
    Order Number PB91-921202CDH, price: Standing Order, call
    for price
    Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
   • Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Sep 90
    The National volume  of the public document series provides
    a progress report on  the cleanup of Superfund sites, site-by-
    site. The document explains the progress and the challenges
    facing the nations. The  publication describes  sites that are
    deemed to be of national priority and provides information on
    their cleanup progress. In addition to this volume, there will
    be state-specific volumes available during early 1991.
    Specifications: Paper copy available on  Standing Order de-
    posit account required (minimum  deposit $100  U.S  Canada
    and Mexico; all others $200).  Single copies also  available in
    paper copy or microfiche. 102p.
   Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials,  Waste  dis-
   posal, Pollution control, Superfund, Cleanup.

 0322  Superfund: Focusing on the Nation at Large. A
   Decade of Progress at National Priorities List Sites
   Order Number PB91-921207CDH, price: PC A06/MF A01
   Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
   Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 90
   The publication summarizes the progress  made in hazardous
   site clean-up of sites on the National Priorities  List (NPL) It
   also provides a  state-by-state summary  of 422 improved
   sites. 'Superfund: Focusing on  the Nation at Large' is supple-
   mented by  individual State books which contain detailed in-
   formation on all 1,236 NPL sites.
   Specifications: Paper  copy available on Standing Order de-
   posit account required  (minimum deposit $200 U S  Canada
   and Mexico; all others  $400). Single copies also available in
   paper copy  or microfiche. Supersedes  PB91-921202  See
  also PB91-921209 through PB91-921258. 103p.
  Subject index keywords: Superfund, Hazardous materials
  Remedial action,  Pollution control, National Priorities List
  Cleanup.

0323 Superfund: Focusing on the Nation  at Large. 1991
  Update
  Order Number PB92-963252CDH, price: PC A05/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 91
  The report summarizes  the progress made in the cleanup of
  sites on the National Priorities  List (NPL).  It also provides a
                                                                                                              55

-------
ADMINISTRATIVE & MANAGEMENT: Special Reports
  stale-by-state summary of 422 improved sites. Supplemented
  by the individual State books which contain detailed informa-
  tion on all 1245 sites.
  Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
  posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
  and  Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
  paper copy or microfiche. See also PB92-963253 and PB91-
  921207. 88p.
  Subject  index keywords: Hazardous  materials,  Pollution
  contra), Superfund, National Priorities List.
 0324  Superfund Policy  Forum Update, Volume 1, Number
   1. February 1992
   Order Number PB92-963262CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
   Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
   Emergency and Remedial Response; Feb 92
   The purpose of the bulletin is  to keep  all Superfund staff
   members knowledgeable and informed about reauthonzation
   issues and events through periodic newsletter updates.
   Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
   posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
   and Mexico; all others  $400). Single copies also available in
   paper copy or microfiche. 6p.
   Subject index keywords: Government policies,  Hazardous
   materials, Project management, Meetings, Superfund, Com-
   prehensive  Environmental Response Compensation  and Li-
   abilities Act(CERCLA), Reauthorization issues.

 0325   Superfund Progress - Aficionado's Version:
   Progress as of June 30,1992              „,.,,-.„.,
   Order Number PB92-963278CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
   Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
   Emergency and Remedial Response; 30 Jun 92
   The quarterly Superfund Progress reports  on the strides the
   Superfund program is making towards protecting  people and
   the environment from  the  hazards of uncontrolled chemical
   releases. The Aficionado's Version of Superfund Progress
   provides more detailed statistical information.  The Summer
   1992 Superfund Progress highlights the Environmental Re-
   sponse Team,  the Superfund  Accelerated Cleanup Model,
   and the Superfund Progress Report - making polluters pay
   for cleanup.
    Specifications:  Paper  copy available on Standing Order, de-
    posit account required (minimum deposit $200  U.S.,  Canada,
    and Mexico; all  others $400). Single copies also available in
    paper copy or microfiche.  See also PB92-963279 and PB92-
    963265. 16p.
    Subject index keywords: Protection, Hazardous materials.

  0326  Superfund Progress - Aficionado's Version
    (Progress as of March 31, 1992)
    Order Number PB92-963267CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
    Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
    Emergency and Remedial Response; Jun 92
    Superfund is the United States program for cleaning up un-
    controlled hazardous waste sites.  Established by the Com-
    prehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Li-
    ability Act (CERCLA)  of 1980, EPA records in its CERCLIS
    database  every hazardous waste  site considered for a Su-
     perfund cleanup and  every site where  a removal  action  is
     performed. The system tracks the identification, evaluation,
     and if necessary, cleanup of hazardous waste sites. The Re-
     medial  Project  managers in each EPA  Region, who oversee
     cleanup efforts, add information about the sites they manage
 to CERCLIS.  Currently, there are 35,984 sites  in CERCLIS.
 The Superfund Site Tally includes the current status of each
 CERCLIS site.
 Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
 posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
 and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
 paper copy or microfiche. 14p.
 Subject index  keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste dis-
 posal,   Pollution control,  Project management, Superfund,
 Comprehensive Environmental Response.

0327  Superfund Progress. Aficionado's Version.  Progress
  as of September 30, 1892
  Order Number PB93-963255CDH, price:  PC A03/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington,  DC. Office of
  Emergency and Remedial Response; Jan 93
  The issue of Superfund Progress Aficionado's Version pro-
  vides facts and figures as of September 30, 1992, for NPL
  site distribution,  emergency  removals, preliminary assess-
  ments/site inspections/the NPL, remedial investigations/fea-
  sibility studies/RODs, remedial action, and enforcement.
  Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
  posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
  and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
  paper copy or microfiche. 15p.
  Subject index keywords: Superfund,  Waste management,
  Hazardous materials, Office of Solid Waste and  Emergency
  Response.
 0328  Superfund Progress: Fall/Winter 1992
  Order  Number PB93-963254CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
   Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
   Emergency and Remedial Response; Jan 93
   The issue of Superfund Progress provides information on Su-
   perfund training programs, promoting local  involvement in
   Superfund, and a Superfund 1992 progress report.
   Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order de-
   posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
   and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also  available in
   paper copy or microfiche. 17p.
   Subject  index keywords:  Superfund,  Training  devices,
   Waste management, Hazardous materials, Personnel devel-
   opment.
 0329 Superfund Progress, Spring 1992
   Order Number PB92-963265CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
   Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
   Emergency and Remedial Response; May 92
   The report describes the Superfund removal program. The
   duties of the  on-scene coordinators who work at Emergency
   spills are described. Case studies at different  sites are  in-
   cluded and the progress made.
   Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
    posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
    and Mexico;  all others $400). Single  copies also available in
    paper copy or microfiche. 12p.
    Subject index keywords:  Hazardous  materials,  Pollution
    control, Project management, Superfund.
   56

-------
                                                                   PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Assessment i
                                                                                                           Listing
  0330  Superfund Progress, Summer 1992
    Order Number PB92-963279CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
    Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
    Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 92
    The quarterly Superfund  Progress report  reports  on the
    strides the Superfund program is making towards protecting
    people and the environment  from the hazards  of uncon-
    troled chemical releases. It portrays  facets of the program
    that often go unnoticed or unpublicized, reports  new devel-
    opments, and provides figures to  show what the program has
    accomplished. The  Summer 1992 Superfund Progress in-
    XSLnrf^"8 f" !h^ Environmental Response Team, the
    Superfund Accelerated Cleanup  Model, and  the Superfund
    Progress Report - Making Polluters Pay for Cleanup.
    Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order de-
    posit account required (minimum  deposit $200 U.S., Canada
    and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
    paper copy or microfiche. 15p.
    Subject index keywords: Protection, Hazardous materials,
    ouperfund.

 °3u1  Juperfund Reauthorization: NACEPT Subcommittee
    Handbook
    Order Number PB93-963298CDH,  price: PC A05/MF A02
    inr^,mental Protection Agency,  Washington, DC. Office of
   bond Waste and Emergency Response; 18 Jun 93
   The handbook for the NACEPT Subcommittee on Superfund
   reauthonzation  includes overview of  Superfund  regulatory
   framework, program status, background materials from meet-
   ings prior to June 1993, and a selection of critical analyses
   or buperfund.
   Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing  Order de-
   posit account required (minimum deposit $200  U.S., Canada
   and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
   paper copy or microfiche. 100p.

   Handbook"?6*  keywords: SuPerfund,  Pollution regulations,

 0332  Superfund Reform Act of 1994
   Order Number PB94-963239CDH, price: PC A10/MF A03
   Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
   Emergency and Remedial Response; Feb 94
  The legislation which would amend the Comprehensive Envi-
   iQfine^Do,eAP0nSe'JCompensation'  and  Liability Act of
   1980 (CERCLA), was developed through a lengthy process
    *£ °ap'tallzed on the expertise  of the many Superfund
  stakeholders - both inside and outside of government
  Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order  de-
  posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S.  Canada
  and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies  also available in
  paper copy or microfiche. 222p.
  Subject  index keywords: Superfund, Waste  management,
  i—Gcjislcition.

0333  Superfund: Report of the EPA Superfund
  Revitalization Public Meeting Held on June 24, 1992
  Volumes 1 and 2
  Order Number PB92-963288CDH, price: PC A06/MF A02
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC Office of
  Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 92
  On June  24, 1992, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
  and its Superfund Revitalization Office helda meeting to en-
  courage public participation in identifying innovative, non-tra-
  ditional approaches to expedite the  Superfund cleanup proc-
    ess. The agenda was structured to focus on four particular
    topic areas: ways to speed up the Superfund cleanup pro-
    gram; ways to encourage and manage voluntary cleanups by
    potentially responsible parties; effective ways to involve the
    state, the community, and  other interested  parties  in the
    entire Superfund cleanup  process; and ways to realistically
    describe the expectations  of the Superfund program,  meas-
    ure its success  in achieving the program's goals, and com-
    municate these  goals and successes to interested parties.
    The  report, organized along the lines of the topics outlined
    above, documents suggestions that were made by attendees
    at the meeting, as well as written comments that were pre-
    pared specifically to  address  the issues  discussed at the
    meeting. The report also provides a summary of EPA follow-
   up actions currently under consideration.
   Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
   posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
   and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
   paper copy or microfiche. 102p.
   Subject index keywords:  Superfund, Meetings, Citizen par-
   ticipation, Remedial action,  Waste management, Cleanup op-
   erations.

 0334  Superfund Revitalization: Measures of Success
   Order Number PB94-963217CDH, price: PC  A04/MF A01
   Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
   Emergency and Remedial Response; 7 Jan 94
   Table of Contents: Introduction; Valuing Superfund Cleanup-
   Accelerating Superfund Response; Communication Initiatives;
   and Contract Management.
   Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
   posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
   and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies  also available in
   paper copy or microfiche. 72p.
   Subject index keywords:  Superfund, Waste management
   Hazardous materials.


PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION:
Assessment &  Listing

0335  Amendment to Historical Definitions of NPL
  Deletion Start and Completion Dates
  Order Number PB93-963278CDH, price: PC A01/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Solid Waste and Emergency  Response; 8 Oct 92
  The memorandum amends two historical CERCLIS (Compre-
  hensive Environmental Response Compensation and Liability
  Information System) definitions of the NPL (National Priorities
  List) deletion process start and completion dates in the Su-
  perfund  Comprehensive  Accomplishments  Plan (SCAP)
  Manual of FY 1987 and the Superfund Program Management
  Manual of FY 1988.
  Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
  posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
  and  Mexico; all others  $400). Single copies also available in
  paper copy or microfiche. 2p.
  Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
  Hazardous materials, Superfund Comprehensive Accomplish-
  ments  Plan,  Office  of Solid  Waste and Emergency  Re-
  sponse.
                                                                                                            57

-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Assessment & Listing
0336  Clarification of Delegation to Approve Consistency
  Exemptions at NPL Sites
  Order Number PB93-963281CDH, price: PC A01/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Solid Waste and  Emergency Response; 3 Jun 92
  The directive clarifies Regional authority to approve exemp-
  tions from the $2 million statutory limit on Superfund removal
  actions.
  Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
  posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
  and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
  paper or microfiche. 2p.
  Subject Index keywords:  Superfund, Waste management,
  Hazardous materials, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
  Response.
 0337  Closing the NPL Book under the Original MRS
  Order Number PB91-921302CDH, price: PC A01/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Emergency and Remedial Response; Nov 90
  The Fact  Sheet discusses the closing of the Old NPL under
  the original HRS. Since 1982, the U.S. Environmental Protec-
  tion Agency (EPA) has been preparing the  National Priorities
  List (NPL). The list informs the public of uncontrolled hazard-
  ous waste sites that warrant further investigation to  deter-
  mine if they  pose  risks to public health or the environment.
  Such  sites are eligible for long-term  'remedial  action' fi-
  nanced under the Trust Fund established by the Comprehen-
  sive Environmental Response,  Compensation,  and Liability
  Act as amended by the Superfund Amendments and  Reau-
  thorization Act of 1986 (SARA). Sites are placed on the NPL
   primarily  on  the basis of  their  scores under EPA's Hazard
   Ranking System (HRS)  model developed in 1982. EPA has
   now  revised  the HRS in response to SARA. The  revised
   HRS,  which  will become effective late in  February 1991, 90
   days after its publication in the Federal Register, is a more
   comprehensive  and accurate scoring system than the origi-
   nal HRS and will add new types of sites to the NPL.
   Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
   posit account required (minimum deposit $150 U.S., Canada,
   and Mexico; all others $300). Single copies also available in
   paper copy or microfiche. 5p.
   Subject  index  keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
   Hazardous materials, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
   Response, National Priorities List, Hazard Ranking System.
  0338  Compendium of NPL Listing Policies and
   Procedures, 1982 to 1985
   Order Number PB91-921281CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
   Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
   Emergency and Remedial Response; Aug 91
   The compendium  is a collection of NPL listing policy and pro-
   cedure directives issued from 1982 to 1985. The contents in-
   clude: Guidance for Establishing the  National Priorities List,
   February 1982 (9320.1-01);  Guidance for Establishing the
   National Priorities List, June  1982 (9320.1-02); Guidance for
   Proposed NPL Update  No.  3, February  1984 (9320.3-04);
   Guidance for Updating the National Priorities List, May 1983
   (9320.3-01);  Instructions for Promulgating the National  Prior-
   ities  List Update, January 1984 (9320.3-02); National  Prior-
   ities List Categorization, July 1984 (9320.1-04); NPL Informa-
   tion Update  - Update No. 4, April 1985 (9320.3-05); Proce-
    dures for Updating the  National  Priorities List, May  1984,
    (9320.3-03); Promulgation of the National Priorities List, May
  1983  (9320.1-03);  RCRA/NPL Listing  Policy,  September
  1986 (9320.1-05); and  Updating the National Priorities List:
  Update No. 6 Proposal, September 1985 (9320.3-06).
  Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
  posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
  and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
  paper copy or microfiche. 74p.
  Subject index keywords:  Hazardous  materials, Waste  dis-
  posal, Superfund.
0339   Discussions with the  Public Concerning NPL
  Listings
  Order Number PB93-963338CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 30 Apr 93
  The  memorandum briefly outlines EPA's policy  on  site-relat-
  ed discussions prior to and during rulemaking concerning the
  listing of sites on the National Priorities List. Recently some
  Regions, as well  as several  members  of  Congress,  have
  raised the question of  what types of site-related discussions
  are permissible between EPA personnel and the public (e.g.,
  potentially responsible parties (PRPs)  or commenters) prior
  to and during the listing process.
  Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
  posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
  and  Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
  paper copy or microfiche. 20p.
  Subject index keywords:  Waste management, Government
  policies, Hazardous materials, Directives,  National  Priorities
  List, Potentially responsible parties(PRPs).

 0340  FACT BOOK: National Priorities List under the
  Original Hazard Ranking System, 1981-1991
  Order Number PB93-963350CDH, price: PC A05/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington,  DC. Office of
  Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Oct 93
  The report provides an overview of the NPL listing process
  and historical data summaries on  the NPL from 1981-1991.
  Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing  Order, de-
  posit account required  (minimum deposit $200  U.S., Canada,
  and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
   paper copy or microfiche. 78p.
   Subject index keywords: Superfund, Listings, National Pri-
   orities List.
 0341   Guidance for Environmental Priorities Initiative (EPI)
   Facilities in the Superfund Pre-Remedial Program
   Order Number PB91-139980CDH,  price: PC A02/MF A01
   Environmental Protection Agency,  Washington, DC. Office of
   Emergency and Remedial  Response; 31 Jan 89
   The directive provides guidance to the Regions and States
   on  handling Environmental Priorities Initiative facilities by the
   Superfund pre-remedial program.  The directive supplements
   directive no. 9932.0 'Method for Prioritizing CERCLA Prelimi-
   nary Assessments at RCRA Facilities,'  dated  May 31,  1988.
   Specifications: See  also PB91-139972. 10p.
   Subject index keywords: Superfund,  Waste  management,
   Hazardous materials, Office of Solid  Waste and Emergency
   Response,  Resource Conservation and Recovery Act, Envi-
   ronmental priorities initiatives.
  58

-------
           PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Assessment &
                                                   Listing
  °3unde?CERCCLAf0r Perf°rming Preli™nary Assessments
    Order Number PB92-963303CDH, price: PC A13/MF A03
    Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC Office of
    Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 91
    The purpose  of the guidance is to provide instructions  for
    conducting  a  PA  and reporting results. The guidance  dis-
    cusses the information required to evaluate a site and how to
    obtain  it, how to score a site, and reporting requirements
    f he document also provides guidelines and instruction on  PA
    evaluation, scoring, and the use of standard  PA scoresheets
    The overall  goal of the guidance is to assist  PA investigators
    in conducting  high-quality assessments that  result in  correct
    site screening or further  action recommendations on a  na-
    tionally consistent basis.
    Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order  de-
    posit account required (minimum  deposit $200 U.S. Canada
    and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
    paper copy or  microfiche.  Supersedes PB90-183054. 277p
    Subject index keywords: Assessments, Hazardous  materi-
    als, Sites, Superfund.

 03£|  ®"idance for Performing Site Inspections under

    Order Number  PB92-963375CDH, price: PC A11/MF A03
    Environmental  Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
    Emergency and Remedial  Response; Sep  92
   The  guidance  presents EPA's  site inspection strategy The
   strategy discusses  procedural  guidelines  to  investigate po-
   tential Superfund (CERCLA) sites for evaluation pursuant  to
    •l^fzaod Rankin9 System (HRS), revised  in accordance
   ^oL -?u  5?!tund  Amendments and Reauthorization  Act of
   nasb. The HRS is the primary  means by which EPA  evalu-
   ates sites for Superfund's National Priorities List (NPL).
   Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order de-
   posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U S  Canada
   and Mexico;  all others $400). Single copies also available in
   paper copy or microfiche. 244p,
   Subject index  keywords: Superfund, Inspection, Site sur-
   veys, Waste management,  Hazardous materials.
 0344  Guidance  on Setting Priorities for NPL  Candidate
   Sites
   Order Number PB93-963333CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
   onr!Jr(?!?,mental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  bond Waste and Emergency Response; 28 Oct 92
  The guidance document identifies factors that will help EPA
  regions  decide the order in which they should consider sites
  with completed site inspections for inclusion on the NPL (Na-
  tional Priorities List).
  Specifications:  Paper copy available on Standing Order de-
  posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada
  and Mexico; all  others $400). Single copies also available in
  paper copy or microfiche. 7p.
  Subject index  keywords:  Superfund,  Inspection, Site sur-
  veys, National Priorities List.

0345  Guide to Management of Investigation-Derived
  Wastes
  Order Number PB92-963353CDH, price- PC A02
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington,  DC. Office of
  Emergency and Remedial Response; Apr 92
  The fact  sheet presents an overview of possible investiga-
  tion-derived waste management  options, discusses  the pro-
    tectiveness requirements and ARARs associated with these
    options, and outlines general objectives established for IDW
    management under Superfund.
    Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
    posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
    and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
    paper copy or microfiche. 8p.
    Subject index keywords:  Waste  management, Pollution
    regulations, Inspection, Superfund, Office of Solid Waste and
    Emergency Response.

  0346  Hazard Ranking System Guidance Manual
    Order Number PB92-963377CDH, price: PC A22/MF A04
    Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
    Emergency and Remedial Response; Nov 92
    The Hazard Ranking System Guidance Manual provides gen-
    eral and technical guidance for individuals involved in deter-
    mining Hazard Ranking System (HRS) scores and preparing
    HRS scoring packages. The manual clarifies terms and con-
    cepts in the HRS, presents strategies and specific guidance
    for scoring  selected HRS factors, and provides guidelines to
    assist in collecting and organizing relevant data.
    Specifications:  Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
    posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
    and Mexico; all  others $400). Single copies also available in
    paper copy or microfiche. 524p.
   Subject index  keywords:  Superfund,  Hazardous  materials,
   Waste  management,  Manuals,   Hazard Ranking  System,
   Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response.

 0347   Hazard Ranking System Guidance Manual
   Order Number PB93-963356CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
   Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC.  Office of
   Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Sep 93
   The  Hazard Ranking System (HRS) is the scoring method
   EPA uses to assess the relative threat associated with the
   release or potential release of hazardous substances from a
   waste site. The HRS is the primary mechanism used by EPA
   to determine which sites should  be placed  on the National
   Priorities List. The manual is targeted  primarily to HRS scor-
   ers and HRS package preparers,  who frequently are govern-
   ment contractors or State agency staff. Inexperienced scor-
   ers should find it especially helpful as a reference while they
   'learn' the HRS.  Others involved in EPA's  site assessment
   process (e.g., HRS package reviewers)  should also find parts
   of the manual useful.
   Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
   posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
   and  Mexico;  all others $400). Single copies  also available in
   paper copy or microfiche. See also PB92-963377. 6p.
  Subject  index  keywords:  Superfund, Manuals,  Hazard
  Ranking System.

0348   Identification of a Senior Superfund Official for
  Addressing  Special NPL Site-Related  Issues
  Order Number PB93-963279CDH, price: PC A01/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Solid Waste and Emergency Response;  22 May 92
  The directive identifies a senior Superfund official responsible
  for reviewing  and  addressing specific issues at NPL (National
  Priorities List) sites that cannot be resolved  at the Regional
  level and identifies criteria for NPL site referrals to  this offi-
  cial.
                                                     59

-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Assessment & Listing
  Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
  posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
  and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
  paper copy or microfiche. 3p.
  Subject Index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
  Hazardous  materials, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
  Response.
0349   Management of Investigation-Derived Wastes during
  Site Inspections
  Order Number PB91-921331CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Emergency and Remedial Response; May 91
  The guidance presents a general regulatory background and
  options for management of  investigation-derived  wastes
  (IDW)  generated  during  Superfund site  inspections  (Sis).
  These wastes include  soil cuttings,  drilling  muds,  purged
  ground water decontamination fluids (water and other fluids),
  disposable sampling equipment (DE), and disposable person-
  al protective equipment  (PPE). The  National Contingency
  Plan  (NCP) requires that management  of  IDW  generated
  during Sis compiles with all applicable or relevant and appro-
  priate requirements (ARARS) to the extent practicable. In ad-
  dition, other legal and practical consideration may affect the
  handling of IDW. Therefore, site  inspection  managers and
  other involved parties should be familiar with this guidance,
  as well as the requirements of the NCP,  ARARs, and EPA's
  interpretation of these requirements.
  Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
  posit account required (minimum deposit  $150 U.S., Canada,
  and Mexico; all others $300). Single copies also available in
  paper copy or microfiche. 70p.
  Subject index keywords:  Superfund, Waste management,
  Pollution regulations, Inspection, Site surveys, Office of Solid
  Waste and Emergency Response.
 0350  Mining Sites  on the National Priorities List: NPL Site
  Summary Reports. Volume 1 (Aluminum Company of
  America (Vancouver Smelter) to Cleveland Mill)
   Order Number PB92-124767CDH,  price: PC$98.00
  Science Applications International  Corp., Falls Church, VA.;
   Environmental Protection Agency,  Washington, DC. Office of
   Solid Waste; 21 Jun 91
   Volume I  of the Mining Sites on  the National Priorities List
   contains the following NPL Site Summary Reports: Aluminum
   Company  of America  (Vouncouver Smelter),  Anaconda
   Smelter, Atlas Asbestos Mine, Bunker Hill Mining and  Metal-
   lurgical  Complex,  California Gulch,  Carson River,  Celtor
   Chemical  Works,  Cherokee County/Galena  Subsite, Cimar-
   ron Mining Corp., Clear Creek/Central  City, and Cleveland
   Mill.
   Specifications: Also  available in set of 5  reports  PC E99,
   PB92-124759. See also Volume 2, PB92-124775. Portions of
   this document are not fully legible. Sponsored by Environ-
   mental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of Solid
   Waste. 955p.
   Subject index keywords: Mine wastes,  Waste  manage-
   ment, Tailings, National Priorities List.
0351  Mining Sites on the National Priorities List: NPL Site
  Summary Reports. Volume 2 (Commencement Bay
  Nearshore/Tideflats to Kerr McGee) (Kress Creek, Reed-
  Keppler Park, Residential Areas, Sewage Treatment
  Plant)
  Order Number PB92-124775CDH, price: PC$91.00
  Science Applications International Corp., Falls Church, VA.;
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Solid Waste; 21 Jun 91
  Volume II of the Mining  Sites on  the National Priorities List
  contains  the  following  NPL Site  Summary  Reports: Com-
  mencement Bay  Nearshore/Tideflats, Denver Radium, Eagle
  Mine East Helena Smelter,  Eastern Michaud Flats Contami-
  nation   Area,   Glen   Ridge/Montclair/West   Orange/US
  Radium, Homestake Mill, Iron Mountain Mine, Johns-Manville
  Coalinga Asbestos Mill, Kerr-McGee (Kress Creek, Reed-
  Keppler Park, Residential Areas, Sewage Treatment Plant).
  Specifications: Also  available in  set of 5 reports PC E99,
  PB92-124759. See also Volume 1, PB92-124767 and Volume
  3, PB92-124783. Portions of this document are not fully legi-
  ble. Sponsored by Environmental  Protection  Agency, Wash-
  ington, DC. Office of Solid Waste.  850p.
  Subject  index  keywords: Mine  wastes, Waste manage-
  ment, Tailings, National Priorities List.
 0352  Mining Sites on th« National Priorities List: NPL Site
  Summary Reports. Volume 3 (Kerr-McGee Chemical
  Corp. (Soda Springs Plant) to Ormet Corp)
  Order Number PB92-124783CDH, price: PC$98.00
  Science Applications International Corp., Falls Church, VA.;
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Solid Waste; 21 Jun 91
  Volume III of the Mining Sites on the National Priorities List
  contains the following  NPL Site Summary Reports:  Kerr-
   McGee Chemical Corp. (Soda Springs Plant), Lincoln Park,
   Martin Marietta Reduction Facility, Midvale Slag (Valley  Mate-
   rials Slag), Milltown Reservoir Sediments, Monsanto Chemi-
   cal Company, Monticello Mill Site, Monticello Vicinity Proper-
   ties, Mouat Industries, and  Ormet  Corporation.
   Specifications:  Also  available in set of 5 reports PC E99,
   PB92-124759. See also Volume 2, PB92-124775 and Volume
   4, PB92-124791. Portions of this  document are  not fully legi-
   ble. Sponsored  by Environmental Protection Agency, Wash-
   ington, DC. Office of Solid Waste. 907p.
   Subject index  keywoirds: Mine wastes, Waste  manage-
   ment, Tailings, National Priorities List.
 0353   Mining Sites on the National Priorities List: NPL Site
   Summary Reports. Volume 4 (Oronogo-Duenweg Mining
   Belt to Tar Creek)
   Order Number PB92-124791CDH, price: PC$91.00
   Science Applications International Corp., Falls Church, VA.;
   Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office  of
   Solid Waste; 21 Jun 91
   Volume IV of the Mining Sites on the National Priorities List
   contains the following NPL Site Summary Reports: Oronogo-
   Deunweg Mining Belt, Palmerton Zinc, Sharon Steel/Midvale
   Tailings, Silver  Bow Creek/Butte Area Site, Silver Mountain
   Mine, Smuggler Mountain,  St. Louis Airport/Hazelwood Inter-
   im/Futura Coatings,  Sulphur Bank Mercury Mine,  and Tar
   Creek.
   Specifications: Also available in set of  5  reports  PC E99,
   PB92-124759. See also Volume 3, PB92-124783 and Volume
  60

-------
                                                                     PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Assessment A
                                                                                                              Listing
    5, PB92-124809. Portions of this document are not fully legi-
    ble. Sponsored by Environmental Protection Agency Wash-
    ington, DC. Office of Solid Waste. 874p.
    Subject  index keywords: Mine  wastes, Waste manage-
    ment, Tailings, National Priorities List.

 0354  Mining Sites on the National Priorities List: NPL Site
    Summary Reports. Volume 5 (Teledyne Wah Chang to
    Wayne Interim Storage Facility/W.R. Grace)
    Order Number PB92-124809CDH, price: PC$77.00
    Science Applications International Corp., Falls Church, VA •
    Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
   Solid Waste; 21 Jun 91
   Volume V of the Mining Sites on the  National Priorities List
   contains the following NPL site summary  reports: Teledyne
   Wah Chang, Tex-Tin Corp., Torch Lake, United Nuclear Cor-
   poration/Churchrock Site,  U.S.  Tatanium,  Uravan Uranium
   Mill,  Whitewood Creek,  and Wayne  Interim Storage Facility/
   W. R. Grace.

   Specifications: Also available in set  of 5  reports PC E99
   PB92-124759. See also Volume 4, PB92-124791.  Portions of
   this document are  not  fully legible. Sponsored by Environ-
   mental Protection Agency,  Washington, DC. Office of Solid
   Waste. 615p.

   Subject  index  keywords:  Mine wastes,   Waste manage-
   ment, Tailings, National Priorities List.

 0355  NPL Characterization  Project:  National Results
   Order Number PB92-963304CDH, price: PC A07/MF A02
   Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
   Emergency and Remedial Response; Nov 91
   The report is one  in a  series  providing information  on  the
   nature of the sites being evaluated by the Superfund site as-
   sessment program.  It is intended to  provide a 'snapshot' of
   national sites on the NPL as of February 1991.  Separate re-
   ports are available for the ten individual EPA Regions.
   Specifications: Paper copy  available on Standing  Order de-
   posit account required (Minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada
   and Mexico; all others $400). Single  copies also available in
   paper copy or microfiche. 138p.
   Subject index keywords:  Hazardous materials,  Pollution
  control, United States, Superfund, National Priorities List US
  EPA Region 1-10.

0356  NPL Characterization Project: Region 1 Results
  Order Number PB92-963305CDH, price: PC A05/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Emergency and Remedial Response; Nov 91
  The report is one in a series providing information on the
  nature of the sites being  evaluated by the Superfund site as-
  sessment program.  It is intended  to provide a 'snapshot' of
  sites in Region 1  on  the NPL as of February 1991. Separate
  reports are available for the other nine EPA  Regions and for
  the nation as a whole.
  Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
  posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S.  Canada
 and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
 paper copy or microfiche. 96p.
 Subject index keywords:  Hazardous   materials,  Pollution
 control, Superfund, National Priorities List, US EPA Region 1.
  0357  NPL Characterization Project: Region 3 Results
    Order Number PB92-963307CDH, price: PC A05/MF A01
    Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
    Emergency and Remedial Response; Nov 91
    The report is one in a series providing information on the
    nature of the sites being evaluated by the Superfund site as-
    sessment program. It is intended to provide a 'snapshot' of
    sites in Region 3  on the NPL as of February 1991. Separate
    reports are available for the other nine EPA Regions and for
    the nation as a whole.
    Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
    posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
    and  Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also  available in
    paper copy or microfiche. 96p.
    Subject! index keywords:  Hazardous materials, Pollution
    control, Superfund, National Priorities List, US EPA Region 3.

 0358  NPL Characterization Project: Region 4 Results
    Order Number PB92-963308CDH, price: PC A05/MF A01
    Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
    Emergency and Remedial Response; Nov 91
   The  report is one in a series providing information on the
   nature of the sites being evaluated by the Superfund site as-
   sessment program. It is intended to provide a 'snapshot' of
   sites in Region 4 on the NPL as of February 1991. Separate
   reports are available for the other nine EPA regions and for
   the nation as a whole.
   Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
   posit account  required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
   and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
   paper copy  or microfiche. 96p.
   Subject index keywords:  Hazardous materials,  Pollution
   control, Superfund, National Priorities List,  US EPA Region 4.
 0359  NPL Characterization Project: Region 5 Results
   Order Number PB92-963309CDH, price:  PC A05/MF A01
   Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
   Emergency and Remedial Response; Nov 91
   The report  is  one  in  a series providing information on the
   nature of the sites  being evaluated by the Superfund site as-
   sessment program. It is intended to provide a 'snapshot' of
   sites in  Region 5 on the NPL as of February 1991. Separate
   reports are available for the other nine EPA  regions and for
   the nation as a whole.
   Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
   posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
   and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
   paper copy or microfiche. 96p.
  Subject  index keywords: Hazardous  materials,  Pollution
  control, Superfund,  National Priorities List, US EPA Region 5.
0360  NPL, Characterization Project: Region 6 Results
  Order Number PB92-963310CDH, price: PC A05/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Emergency and Remedial Response; Nov 91
  The report is one  in a series providing information on the
  nature of the sites being evaluated by the Superfund site as-
  sessment program.  It is intended to provide a 'snapshot' of
  sites in Region  6 on the NPL as of February 1991. Separate
  reports are available for the other nine EPA regions and for
  the nation as a  whole.
  Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
  posit account required (minimum deposit  $200 U.S., Canada,
                                                                                                                61

-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Assessment & Listing
  and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
  paper copy or microfiche. 96p.
  Subject  Index keywords: Hazardous  materials,  Pollution
  control, Superfund, National Priorities List, US EPA Region 6.
0361  NPL Characterization Project: Region 7 Results
  Order Number PB92-963311CDH, price: PC A05/MF Ap1
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Emergency and Remedial Response; Nov 91
  The report is  one in a series  providing  information on  the
  nature of the sites being evaluated by the Superfund site as-
  sessment program. It is intended to provide a 'snapshot' of
  sites in Region 7 on the NPL as of February 1991. Separate
  reports are available for the other nine EPA regions and for
  the nation as a whole.
  Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
  posit account required (minimum deposit  $200 U.S., Canada,
  and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies  also available in
  paper copy or microfiche. 92p.
  Subject  Index keywords: Hazardous  materials, Pollution
  control, Superfund, National Priorities List, US EPA Region 7.

 0362  NPL Characterization Project: Region 8 Results
  Order Number PB92-963312CDH, price: PC A05/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Emergency and Remedial Response; Nov 91
  The report is one in  a series providing information on the
  nature of the sites being evaluated by the Superfund site as-
  sessment program. It is intended to provide a 'snapshot' of
  sites in Region 8 on the NPL as of February 1991. Separate
  reports are available for the other nine EPA Regions and for
  the nation as a whole.
  Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
   posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
   and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
   paper copy or microfiche. 92p.
   Subject Index keywords: Hazardous  materials,  Pollution
   control,  Superfund, National Priorities List,  US  EPA Region.
 0363   NPL Characterization Project: Region 9 Results
   Order Number PB92-963313CDH, price: PC A05/MF A01
   Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
   Emergency and Remedial Response; Nov 91
   The  report is one in a series providing information on  the
   nature of the sites being evaluated by the Superfund site as-
   sessment program. It is intended to provide a 'snapshot' of
   sites In  Region 9 on the NPL as of February 1991. Separate
   reports  are available for the other nine EPA Regions and for
   the nation as a whole.
   Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
   posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
   and  Mexico; all others $400).  Single copies also available in
   paper copy or microfiche. 96p.
   Subject Index  keywords: Hazardous  materials, Pollution
   control, Superfund, National Priorities List, US EPA Region 9.
  0364  NPL Characterization Project: Region 10 Results
   Order Number PB92-963314CDH, price: PC A05/MF A01
   Environmental Protection Agency, Washington,  DC. Office of
   Emergency and Remedial Response; Nov 91
   The report  is one in a series providing information on the
   nature of the sites being evaluated by the Superfund site as-
   sessment program. It is intended to provide a  'snapshot' of
   sites in Region 10 on the NPL as of February 1991. Separate
  reports are available for the other nine EPA regions and for
  the nation as a whole.
  Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
  posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
  and Mexico;  all others $400). Single copies also available in
  paper copy or microfiche. 96p.
  Subject index  keywords:  Hazardous materials, Pollution
  control, Superfund, National Priorities List.

0365   NPL Construction Completion Definition at
  Bioremediation and Soil Vapor Extraction Sites
  Order Number PB93-963327CDH, price: PC A01/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 21 Jun 93
  The  report discusses EPA's policy for categorizing bioreme-
  diation and soil vapor extraction sites as Construction Com-
  pletions. Technologies addressed are: in-situ soil vapor ex-
  traction, in-situ bioremediation, and ex-situ bioremediation.
  Specifications:  Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
  posit account required (minimum deposit $225 U.S., Canada,
  and  Mexico; all others $450). Single copies also available in
  paper copy or microfiche. 5p.
  Subject index  keywords:  Government policies, Construc-
  tion,  Hazardous  materials,  Superfund, Directives, National
  Priority List.
 0366  PA Review Checklist
  Order Number PB93-963342CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 28 Apr 93
  The preliminary assessment (PA) review checklist was  de-
  signed to evaluate the quality of PA work products. The
  review will ensure that EPA decisions concerning the disposi-
  tion of sites are made in a nationally consistent, scientifically
  based, and  efficient mariner. The order in which information
  is presented in the PA does not  have to be consistent with
  the  checklist, but the PA should be organized in a logical se-
  quence and consistent with PA guidance. The checklist and
  the  PA guidance  manual can be ordered from the  National
  Technical  Information  Service (NTIS) by calling 703-487-
  4650  To order both documents,  the order number is  PB92-
  963303. The checklist by itself is order  number  PB93-
   963342.
   Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
   posit account required  (minimum  deposit $225 U.S., Canada,
   and Mexico; all others $450). Single copies also available in
   paper copy or microfiche. See also PB92-963303. 16p.
   Subject index keywords: Superfund, Hazardous materials,
   Waste disposal, Assessments.
 0367   PA-Score (Preliminary Assessment Score) User's
   Manual and Tutorial. Version 2.1
   Order Number PB93-108322CDH, price: PC A05/MF A01
   Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC.
   Hazardous  Site Evaluation Div; 16 Nov 92
   The PA-Score software package is comprised  of the PA-
   Score  and  PA-Print  computer   programs  and the  users
   manual. The PA-Score software package  has  been devel-
   oped to assist preliminary  assessment (PA) evaluations  by
   generating  an upper bound estimate of the Hazard Ranking
   System (HRS) score  and  associated documentation for a
   site. The PA-Score computer program (PA-Score) assists in-
   vestigators in meeting FA evaluation requirements. PA-Score
  62

-------
                                                                   PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Assessment &
                                                                                                            Listing
   performs PA calculations from raw  data  to  calculate  site
   scores. The  PA-Print computer program (PA-Print) generates
   PA scoresheets and the Potential Hazardous Waste Site Pre-
   liminary  Assessment form. The users manual provides in-
   structions to  install and use PA-Score and PA-Print.
   Specifications: For system on diskette, see  PB93-500346
   and PB93-500353. 82p.
   Subject index keywords:  User  manuals(Computer  pro-
   grams), Super-fund, Waste management, Hazardous materi-
   als, Environmental surveys, Preliminary Assessment.

 0368  PA-Score (Preliminary Assessment Score), Version
   1.0 (for Microcomputers)
   Order Number PB92-500032GDH, price: D02
   Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
   Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 91
   The PA-Score  computer program has been developed to
   assist Superfund  site  assessment  investigations  in  the
   Hazard  Ranking System  (HRS) at  the Preliminary Assess-
   ment stage of site  scoring. The Preliminary Assessment is
   used  to assess the relative threat associated with actual or
   potential  releases of hazardous substances  to ground water
   surface water, soil, and air.
   Specifications: The software is on one, 5 1/4 inch diskette
   1.2M  high density.  File format:  ASCII documentation includ-
   ed; may  be  ordered separately as PB92-963302. System-
   IBM PC or compatible; MS DOS 3.0 operating system 384K
   Language:  Compiled C.  See  also PB92-500024  PB91-
   507509, PB91-506964, PB90-502030,  PB90-501487  PB89-

                                      PB9'-59131'1'
  Subject index keywords: Software, Superfund, Hazardous
  materials, Waste management,  Environmental surveys  Pre-
  liminary Assessment.

0369  PA-Score (Preliminary Assessment Score), Version
  2.1, 3  1/2 inch (for Microcomputers)
  Order  Number PB93-500353CDH, price: D02
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington DC
  Hazardous Site Evaluation  Div; Oct 92
  The PA-Score  computer program has  been developed to
  assist   Superfund  site  assessment  investigations  in' the
  Hazard Ranking System (HRS) at the  Preliminary Assess-
  ment stage of  site  scoring. The Preliminary Assessment is
  used to assess the relative threat associated with actual or
  potential releases of hazardous substances to ground water
  surface water, soil, and air. Version 2.1 is an update that re-
  solves a programming  error in  the scoring of the resident
  population targets for soil exposure.
  Specifications: The software .is  on one 3 1/2 inch diskette
  1.44M  high  density. File format: ASCII. Documentation in-
  cluded; may be  ordered separately as PB93-108322. System-
  IBM  compatible;  MS  DOS operating system, 384K  Lan-
  guage: Compiled C. See also PB92-500024 PB91-507509
  PB91-506964,  PB90-502030, PB90-501487, PB89-186068'
  PB92-592001,   PB91-591331,  PB91-591311,  and  PB90-
 591781. Other  formats available as  5  1/4 inch diskette
 PB93-500346. 1 diskette.
 Subject index keywords:  Software,  Superfund, Waste dis-
 posal,  Hazardous materials, Site surveys,  Hazard Ranking
 System.
  0370  PA-Score (Preliminary Assessment Score), Version
    2.1, 5 1/4 inch (for Microcomputers)
    Order Number PB93-500346CDH, price: D02
    Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC.
    Hazardous Site Evaluation Div; Oct 92
    The PA-Score  computer program has  been developed to
    assist Superfund  site  assessment  investigations  in  the
    Hazard  Ranking System (HRS) at the  Preliminary Assess-
    ment stage of  site  scoring. The  Preliminary Assessment is
    used to assess the relative threat associated with actual or
    potential releases of hazardous substances to ground water,
    surface  water, soil, and air. Version 2.1 is an update that re-
    solves a programming  error in the scoring of the resident
    population targets for soil exposure.
    Specifications: The software is on one (1) 5 1/4 inch  dis-
    kettes, 1.2M high  density. File format: ASCII. Documentation
    included;  may  be  ordered separately as PB93-108322.
    System:  IBM PC or Compatible; MS DOS 3.0 operating
    system,  384K.  Language: Compiled  C.  Supersedes PB92-
    500032.  See  also  PB92-500024,  PB91-507509,  PB91-
   506964, PB90-502030,  PB90-501487, PB89-186068  PB92-
   592001,  PB91-591331,  PB91-591311, and PB90-591781.
   Other formats available as  31/2 inch, 1.44 MB diskette
   PB93-500353.1 diskette.
   Subject index keywords: Software,  Superfund, Waste dis-
   posal, Hazardous  materials, Site  surveys,  Hazard Ranking
   System.

 0371  PA-Score Software, Version 1.0. Users Manual and
   Tutorial
   Order Number PB92-963302CDH, price: ,PC A04/MF A01
   Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
   Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 91
   The PA-Score software package  is comprised of the PA-
   Score and  PA-Print computer programs  and  the  users
   manual.  The PA-Score software package has been  devel-
   oped to  assist preliminary assessment (PA) evaluations by
   generating an upper  bound estimate of the Hazard Ranking
   System (HRS) score and associated documentation for a
   site. The PA-Score computer program (PA-Score) assists in-
   vestigators in meeting PA evaluation requirements. PA-Score
   performs PA calculations from  raw data to calculate  site
   scores. The  PA-Print  computer program (PA-Print) generates
   PA scoresheets and the Potential Hazardous Waste Site Pre-
   liminary Assessment  form. The  users manual provides  in-
   structions to install and use PA-Score and PA-Print.
   Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
   posit account required (minimum  deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
   and Mexico;  all others $400). Single copies also available in
   paper copy or microfiche. For system on diskette, see PB92-
   500032. 73p.   .
  Subject     index     keywords:    Superfund,     User
   manuals(Computer  programs), Hazardous materials,  Waste
  management,  Environmental  surveys,  Preliminary Assess-
  ment.

0372  Preliminary  Ranking Evaluation Score (PREscore)
  Version 1.1 (for Microcomputers)
  Order Number PB92-503507CDH, price: D02
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC.
  Hazardous Site Evaluation Div; Jul 92
  The PREscore computer program  has been developed to
  assist Superfund  site assessment  investigations in Hazard
                                                                                                              63

-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Assessment & Listing
  Ranking System (HRS) site  scoring.  The HRS  is used to
  assess the relative threat  associated with actual or potential
  releases of hazardous substances to  ground water, surface
  water, soil, and air. The HRS is the primary means by which
  EPA evaluates sites for the National Priorities List (NPL), the
  list of the hazardous waste sites that are eligible for remedial
  funding under the Superfund program. PREscore is designed
  to be  user-friendly, operating via hierarchically-dependent
  spreadsheets that allow data to be entered quickly and effi-
  ciently. Significant program features  include:  instant score
  calculation and continuous score  display, multiple site-sce-
  nario testing capability, extensive help screens, and compre-
  hensive documentation ability. PREscore fully automates the
  HRS, allowing for the  entry  and evaluation of all types  of
  site-related information. In addition, PREscore contains HRS-
  related hazardous substance information derived from the
  Agency's Superfund Chemical Data Matrix (SCDM), which in-
  cludes substance characteristics. PREscore  is  accompanied
  by PREprint, a program that produces an extensive docu-
  mentation record for sites evaluated by PREscore.
  Specifications: The software is on one 51/4 inch diskette,
  1.2M high density. Documentation included;  may be ordered
  separately as PB92-963349.  System:  IBM-PC or compatible;
  MS  DOS  3.1 operating system, 384K. Language: Compiled
  'C1. See also PB91-506964, PB92-592291, PB90-591791 and
  PB92-500024.1 diskette.
  Subject  index  keywords:  Models-Simulation,   Superfund,
  Hazardous  materials,  Environmental  impact  assessments,
  Waste disposal, PREscore program, Hazard Ranking System.

 0373  Preliminary Ranking Evaluation Score (PREscore)
  Version 2.0 (for Microcomputers)
  Order Number PB93-505915CDH, price: DOS
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington,  DC.
  Hazardous Site Evaluation Div; May 93
  The PREscore computer  program has been  developed to
  assist  Superfund site  assessment investigations in  Hazard
  Ranking System (HRS) site  scoring.  The HRS  is used to
  assess the relative threat associated  with actual or potential
  releases of hazardous substances to ground water, surface
  water, soil, and air. PREscore is designed to be user-friendly,
  operating  via  hierarchically-dependent  spreadsheets that
  allow data to be entered quickly and efficiently. Significant
  program features include: Instant score calculation and con-
  tinuous score display; Multiple site-scenario testing capability;
   Extensive Help screens; Comprehensive documentation abili-
  ty; PREscore fully automates the HRS, allowing for the entry
  and evaluation of all types of site-related information includ-
   ing  sampling data, waste quantities  and waste characteris-
   tics, physical parameters  of the site, population data, and ad-
   ministrative information. In addition, PREscore  contains  HRS-
   related hazardous  substance information derived from the
   Agency's Superfund Chemical Data Matrix (SCDM), which in-
   cludes substance characteristics such as toxicity and persist-
   ence,  and concentration benchmarks for  the  substances
   commonly encountered at Superfund sites.  PREscore  is ac-
   companied by PREprint,  a program that produces an exten-
   sive documentation record for sites evaluated by PREscore.
   Specifications: Both 31/2 inch and 51/4  inch high density
   diskettes are provided. Documentation included;  may be or-
   dered separately as PB93-192698. System: IBM-PC or com-
   patible;  MS DOS  3.1 operating  system, 384K.  Language:
   Compiled  'C'. Supersedes  PB92-503507.  See  also PB90-
  591791,  PB92-592291,  PB92-501774,  PB93-500742, and
  PB93-500353. 1 diskette.
  Subject index keywords!: Software, Models-simulation, Su-
  perfund, PREscore computer model.

0374  PREscore Software. Users Manual and Tutorial.
  Version 1.0
  Order Number PB92-963349CDH, price: PC A05/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 91
  The manual  serves  as a users  manual and tutorial for the
  PREscore computer program. The PREscore package has
  been developed by EPA Headquarters to assist site assess-
  ment investigations and  Hazard  Ranking System  scoring by
  generating a Preliminary Ranking Evaluation (PRE)score and
  associated  documentation. The users manual  consists of
  three  parts that introduce one to the software package and
  take one through installation procedures, provide a tutorial by
  walking one through  screens,  and provide  instruction for
  using  PREprint to perform printing functions on  PREscore
  site files.
  Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
  posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
  and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available  in
  paper copy or microfiche. 85p.
  Subject  index keywords: Site  surveys, Computer applica-
  tions, Waste management, Hazardous materials,  Superfund,
  HRS(Hazard Ranking System).

0375  PREscore Software: Users Manual and Tutorial
  Version  2.0
  Order Number PB93-192698CDH, price: PC A05/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Solid Waste and Emergency Response; May 93
  The PREscore software package  has been developed  to
  assist  site assessment  investigations  and Hazard Ranking
  System (HRS) scoring by generating a Preliminary Ranking
  Evaluation score and associated documentation.  The users
  manual consists of three parts.  Chapter 1, 'Getting Started',
  introduces you  to  the  software  package  and   takes you
  through the procedures necessary to install PREscore soft-
  ware on your computer. Chapter 2, Tutorial', provides an ini-
  tial step-by-step 'hands-on'  lesson in using PREscore  by
  'walking' you through a  series of screens, entering and edit-
  ing data. Chapter 3, 'Printing', provides instruction for using
  PREprint, which performs printing functions on PREscore site
  files. The manual assumes some familiarity with the IBM PC-
  type  platform.  Actual scoring of  a site with PREscore re-
  quires little,  if any, knowledge of the Disk Operating  System
   (DOS).
  Specifications: For system on diskette,  see PB93-505915.
   91p.
   Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste disposal, Haz-
   ardous materials, PREscore computer model.

 0376  Regional Quality Control Guidance for NPL
   Candidate Sites
   Order Number PB92-963352CDH,  price: PC A04/MF A01
   Environmental Protection Agency,  Washington, DC. Office of
   Emergency and Remedial Response; Dec 91
   The guidance manual provides recommended procedures  for
   a Regional Quality  Control program  for the evaluation of
   Hazard  Ranking System packages. The guidance, intended
 64

-------
                                                                   PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Assessment &
                                                                                                           Listing
   primarily for use by EPA Regional offices,  is to standardize
   Regional QC review and improve HRS package quality. The
   document should serve anyone preparing or reviewing HRS
   packages, and should complement other guidances for con-
   ducting PAs and Sis, and applying the HRS,  to assist Re-
   gions in the site listing process.
   Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
   posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada
   and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
   paper copy or  microfiche. 70p.
   Subject index keywords:  Hazardous  materials, Quality con-
   trol, Ranking, Superfund, US EPA regions, National Priorities
   List.

 0377  Revised Hazard Ranking System: An  Improved Tool
   for Screening Superfund Sites
   Order Number PB91-921307CDH, price: PC A01/MF A01
   Environmental  Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
   Emergency and Remedial Response; Nov 90
   The Fact Sheet discusses the revised HRS which retains the
   same cutoff score and  basic approach as the original HRS
   while incorporating SARA requirements as well as improve-
   ments identified as necessary by EPA and the public. The re-
   vised HRS  retains the ground water, surface water, and  air
   pathways, drops the direct contact and fire/explosion path-
   ways, and adds a fourth pathway, soil exposure. Several key
   provisions of the revised HRS make it more comprehensive
   Other provisions make the  revised HRS more  accurate. The
   complexity and scope of the issues involved in revising the
   HRS required EPA to get widespread  input. The majority of
   the commenters believed that the revised HRS represented
   an improvement over the original HRS. The result is a re-
   vised HRS that is a practical and effective tool in identifying
   the nation's worst hazardous waste sites.
   Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
   posit account required (minimum deposit $150 U.S., Canada,
  and Mexico; all others $300). Single copies also available in
  paper copy or microfiche. 4p.
  Subject index keywords:  Superfund,  Hazardous materials,
  On-site investigations, Waste management,  Office of Solid
  Waste and Emergency Response, Hazard Ranking System.
0378  Revised Hazard Ranking System: Background
  Information
  Order Number PB91 -921303CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Emergency and Remedial Response; Nov 90
  The  Fact  Sheet discusses the Hazard Ranking  System
  (HRS) in response to the Superfund Amendments and Reau-
  thorization Act  of 1986  (SARA). The HRS is the scoring
  system  EPA uses to assess the relative threat associated
  with  the release or potential  release of hazardous sub-
  stances from a  waste site. The HRS score is the primary cri-
  terion EPA  uses to  determine  whether  a  site should be
  placed on the  National Priorities List (NPL). The NPL identi-
  fies sites  that warrant  further investigation  to determine  if
  they pose risks  to public health or the environment. Sites on
  the NPL are eligible for long-term 'remedial action'  financed
  under the Comprehensive Environmental  Response, Com-
  pensation, and  Liability Act of 1980  (CERCLA), as amended
  by SARA. SARA authorizes a 'Hazardous Substances Super-
  fund'  totalling $8.5 billion over 5 years  to  pay costs not as-
  sumed by those responsible for problems at a site. The HRS
  uses  data that  can be collected relatively quickly and  inex-
   pensively, thus allowing most Superfund resources to be di-
   rected to remedial actions at sites on the NPL.
   Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
   posit account required (minimum deposit $150 U.S., Canada,
   and Mexico; all others $300). Single copies also available in
   paper copy or microfiche. 13p.
   Subject index keywords: Superfund, Hazardous materials,
   On-site investigations, Waste management, Hazard Ranking
   System, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response.

 0379  Revised Hazard Ranking System: Evaluating Sites
   After Waste Removals
   Order Number PB92-963326CDH, price: PC A03
   Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
   Emergency and Remedial Response; Oct 91
   The fact  sheet defines  the concept of 'qualifying removal',
   explains how to score sites where qualifying removals have
   been conducted, and discusses some  of  the management
   implications of the removal policy. In addition, the fact sheet
   provides examples of how to score sites where removals
   have occurred.
   Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order,  de-
   posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
   and Mexico; all others $400). Single  copies also  available in
   paper copy or microfiche. 11 p.
   Subject  index  keywords:  Hazardous materials,  Project
   management, Removal, Pollution control, Superfund.

 0380  Revised Hazard Ranking System (HRS): Final Rule
   Order Number PB91-100800CDH, price: PC A16/MF A02
   Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
   Emergency and Remedial Response;  9 Nov  90
   The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has revised
   the Hazard Ranking System (HRS) in response to the Super-
   fund Amendments  and Reauthorization  Act  of 1986 (SARA).
   The HRS is the scoring system EPA uses to assess the rela-
   tive threat associated with the release or potential release of
   hazardous  substances from a waste  site. The HRS score is
   the primary criterion EPA uses to determine whether  a site
   should be placed on the National Priorities List (NPL). The
   NPL identifies sites that warrant further investigation to  deter-
   mine if they pose risks to public health or the environment.
   Sites on the NPL are eligible, for  long-term  'remedial action'
   financed under the  Comprehensive Environmental  Response,
   Compensation  and Liability  Act of  1980 (CERCLA),  as
   amended by SARA. The revised HRS  retains the same  cutoff
   score and basic approach as the original HRS, while incorpo-
   rating SARA requirements as well as improvements identified
   as necessary by EPA  and  the public. The revised HRS re-
  tains the  ground  water,  surface water,  and  air pathways
  drops the direct  contact and fire/explosion pathways, and
  adds a forth pathway, soil exposure.
  Specifications: 352p.
  Subject index keywords: Ranking, Hazardous  materials,
  Pollution control, Superfund.

0381  Revised Hazard Ranking System: Qs and As
  Order Number PB91-921305CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Emergency and Remedial Response; Nov 90
  The  Fact  Sheet  discusses U.S.  Environmental  Protection
  Agency (EPA) revised Hazard Ranking System (HRS)  in re-
  sponse to  the Supertund Amendments  and  Reauthorization
                                                                                                              65

-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Assessment & Listing
  Act (SARA). These  revised HRS Qs and As address the
  SARA requirements for the revised MRS, specific revisions to
  the HRS, the impact of the revised HRS on the site assess-
  ment and remedial processes, and selection of the  cutoff
  score.
  Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
  posit account required (minimum deposit $150 U.S., Canada,
  and Mexico; all others $300). Single copies also available in
  paper copy or microfiche. 8p.
  Subject index keywords:  Superfund, Hazardous  materials,
  Waste management,  Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
  Response, Hazard Ranking System.

0382 Site Assessment Information Directory (SAID)
  Region 1 (for Microcomputers). Date of Coverage:
  October 1991
  Order Number  PB93-506111CDH, price: DOS
  Environmental  Protection Agency, Washington, DC; Oct 91
  The Site Assessment Information Directory (SAID) is a data-
  base  of information sources designed  to support EPA Re-
  gional, state, and contractor staff in data collection efforts for
  site investigation activities. SAID is designed to assist data
  collection activities,  especially during  Preliminary Assess-
  ments (PAs)  and  Site  Inspections  (Sis),  and to support
  Hazard Ranking  system (HRS) package preparation.  SAID
  entries are cross-referenced according to  categories of infor-
  mation and geographical areas and  may be  accessed in a
  variety of ways. The SAID database system is supplemented
  by a User's Guide and EPA region specific 'Phone book' list-
  ing of information sources.
  Specifications: The  datafile is on one 31/2 inch diskette,
  1.44M high density. Documentation included;  may be ordered
  separately as  PB93-192797.  System:  IBM compatible; MS
  DOS  operating system.  480K RAM required  (550— recom-
  mended). See also  Region  1 - PB93-506111, Region 2 -
  PB93-506129, Region 3 -  PB93-506137, Region 4 - PB93-
  506145, Region 5 - PB93-506152,  Region 6  - PB93-506160,
  Region 7 - PB93-506178, Region 8 - PB93-506186, Region 9
  - PB93-506194, Region 10 - PB93-506202. 1  diskette.
  Subject index keywords: Superfund, Data bases, Software,
  SAID(Site Assessment Information Directory).
 0383  Site Assessment Information Directory (SAID)
  Region 2 (for Microcomputers). Date of Coverage:
  October 1991
  Order Number PB93-506129CDH, price: DOS
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC; Oct 91
  The Site Assessment Information Directory (SAID) is a data-
  base of information  sources  designed to support EPA Re-
  gional, state, and contractor staff in data  collection efforts for
  site investigation activities.  SAID is designed to assist data
  collection  activities,  especially during Preliminary Assess-
   ments  (PAs)  and Site Inspections (Sis),  and to support
   Hazard Ranking system (HRS) package preparation. SAID
   entries are cross-referenced according to categories of infor-
   mation and geographical areas and may be accessed in a
  variety of ways. The SAID database system  is supplemented
   by a User's Guide and EPA region specific 'Phone book' list-
   Ing of information sources.
   Specifications: The datafile  is on  one 3 1/2 inch diskette,
   1.44M high density. Documentation included; may be ordered
   separately as PB93-192805. System: IBM  compatible; MS
   DOS operating system. 480K RAM required (550-  recom-
   mended).  See also  Region  1 - PB93-506111,  Region 2 -
  PB93-506129, Region 3 - PB93-506137, Region 4 - PB93-
  506145, Rgion 5 - PB93-506152, Region 6 - PB93-506160,
  Region 7 - PB93-506178, Region 8 - PB93-506186, Region 9
  - PB93-506194, Region 10 - PB93-506202. 1 diskette.
  Subject index keywords: Superfund, Data bases, Software,
  SAID(Site Assessment Information Directory).

0384  Site Assessment Information Directory (SAID)
  Region 3 (for Microcomputers). Date of Coverage:
  October 1991
  Order Number PB93-506137CDH, price: DOS
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC; Oct 91
  The Site Assessment Information Directory (SAID) is a data-
  base of information  sources designed to support EPA  Re-
  gional, state, and contractor staff in data collection efforts for
  site investigation activities. SAID is designed to assist data
  collection  activities,  especially during  Preliminary Assess-
  ments  (PAs)  and Site Inspections  (Sis), and to  support
  Hazard Ranking system (HRS) package  preparation. SAID
  entries are cross-referenced according to categories of infor-
  mation and geographical  areas and may be accessed in a
  variety of ways. The SAID database system is supplemented
  by a User's Guide and EPA region specific 'Phone book' list-
  ing of information sources.
  Specifications: The datafile is on  one 3 1/2 inch diskette,
  1.44M high density. Documentation included; may be ordered
  separately as  PB93-192813.  System: IBM  compatible; MS
  DOS  operating  system. 480K  RAM required (550-  recom-
  mended).  See also  Region 1  - PB93-506111, Region 2 -
  PB93-506129, Region  3 - PB93-506137,  Region 4 -  PB93-
  506145, Region 5 -  PB93-506152,  Region 6 - PB93-506160,
  Region 7 - PB93-506178,  Region 8 - PB93-506186, Region 9
  - PB93-506194, Region  1C) - PB93-506202. 1 diskette.
  Subject index keywords: Superfund, Data bases, Software,
  SAID(Site Assessment Information Directory).

 0385  Site Assessment Information Directory (SAID)
  Region 4 (for Microcomputers). Date of Coverage:
  October 1991
  Order Number PB93-506145CDH, price: DOS
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC; Oct 91
  The Site Assessment Information  Directory (SAID) is a data-
  base of information sources designed to support EPA Re-
  gional, state, and contractor staff in data collection efforts for
  site  investigation activities. SAID is designed to assist  data
  collection activities,  especially during Preliminary Assess-
  ments  (PAs) and Site Inspections  (Sis),  and to  support
  Hazard Ranking system  (HRS) package preparation.  SAID
  entries are cross-referenced according to categories of infor-
  mation and  geographical areas and  may be accessed in a
  variety of ways. The SAID database system is supplemented
  by a User's Guide and  EPA region specific 'Phone book' list-
  ing of information sources.
  Specifications: The datafile is on one 3 1/2  inch diskette,
   1.44M high density.  Documentation included; may be ordered
  separately as  PB93-192821.  System: IBM compatible; MS
   DOS  operating system. 480K  RAM  required (550— recom-
   mended). See  also Region  1 -  PB93-506111, Region 2 -
   PB93-506129,  Region  3  - PB93-506137, Region 4 - PB93-
   506145, Region 5 - PB93-506152, Region 6 -  PB93-506160,
   Region 7 - PB93-506178, Region 8 - PB93-506186,  Region 9
   - PB93-506194, Region 10 - PB93-506202. 1 diskette.
 66

-------
                                                                   PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Assessment &
                                                                                                            Listing
   Subject index keywords: Superfund, Data bases, Software,
   SAID(Site Assessment Information Directory).

 0386  Site Assessment Information Directory (SAID)
   Region 5 (for Microcomputers). Date of Coverage: 1991
   Order Number PB93-506152CDH, price: DOS
   Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC; Oct 91
   The Site Assessment Information Directory  (SAID) is a data-
   base of information sources designed to  support EPA Re-
   gional, state, and contractor staff in data collection efforts for
   site  investigation activities. SAID is designed to assist data
   collection activities, especially  during Preliminary Assess-
   ments (PAs)  and  Site  Inspections  (Sis),  and to  support
   Hazard  Ranking  system (MRS)  package preparation.  SAID
   entries are cross-referenced according to categories of infor-
   mation and geographical areas  and  may be accessed in a
   variety of ways. The SAID database system is supplemented
   by a User's Guide and EPA region specific 'Phone book' list-
   ing of information sources.
   Specifications: The datafile is on one 3 1/2 inch diskette,
   1.44M high density. Documentation included; may be ordered
   separately as PB93-192839. System: IBM  compatible; MS
   DOS operating system. 480K  RAM required (550-  recom-
   mended).  See also Region 1 - PB93-506111, Region 2 -
   PB93-506129, Region 3  -  PB93-506137, Region 4 - PB93-
  506145, Region 5 - PB93-506152,  Region 6 - PB93-506160
  Region 7 - PB93-506178, Region 8 - PB93-506186, Region 9
  - PB93-506194, Region 10 - PB93-506202. 1 diskette.
  Subject index keywords: Superfund, Data bases, Software,
  SAID(Site Assessment Information Directory).

0387  Site Assessment Information Directory (SAID)
  Region 6 (for Microcomputers). Date of Coverage-
  October 1991
  Order Number PB93-506160CDH, price: DOS
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC; Oct 91
  The Site Assessment Information Directory  (SAID) is a data-
  base of information  sources designed to support EPA Re-
  gional, state, and contractor staff in data collection efforts for
  site investigation activities.  SAID is designed to assist  data
  collection  activities,  especially  during Preliminary Assess-
  ments (PAs)  and  Site  Inspections (Sis),  and to support
  Hazard Ranking  system (HRS) package preparation. SAID
  entries are cross-referenced according to categories of infor-
  mation and geographical  areas and may be accessed  in a
  variety of ways. The SAID database system is supplemented
  by a User's Guide and EPA region specific 'Phone book' list-
  ing of information sources.
  Specifications: The  datafile is on one 3 1/2 inch  diskette,
  1.44M high density. Documentation included;  may be ordered
  separately as  PB93-192847. System:  IBM  compatible; MS
  DOS  operating system. 480K RAM required (550- recom-
  mended). See also Region 1  -  PB93-506111,  Region 2 -
  PB93-506129,  Region 3 - PB93-506137,  Region 4 -  PB93-
  506145, Region 5 - PB93-506152, Region 6  - PB93-506160
  Region 7 - PB93-506178, Region 8 - PB93-506186, Region 9
  - PB93-506194, Region 10 -  PB93-506202. 1 diskette.
  Subject index keywords: Superfund, Data bases, Software,
  SAID(Site Assessment Information Directory).
 0388  Site Assessment Information Directory (SAID)
   Region 7 (for Microcomputers). Date of Coverage:
   October 1991
   Order Number PB93-506178CDH, price: DOS
   Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC; Oct 91
   The Site Assessment  Information Directory  (SAID) is a data-
   base of  information sources designed to support EPA Re-
   gional, state, and contractor staff in data collection efforts for
   site  investigation activities. SAID  is designed to assist data
   collection activities, especially during Preliminary Assess-
   ments (PAs)  and  Site  Inspections  (Sis),  and to  support
   Hazard  Ranking system (HRS) package preparation.  SAID
   entries are cross-referenced according to categories of infor-
   mation and geographical areas and  may be accessed in a
   variety of ways. The SAID database system  is supplemented
   by a User's Guide and EPA region specific 'Phone  book' list-
   ing of information sources.
   Specifications: The datafile is on one 3 1/2 inch diskette,
   1.44M high density. Documentation included; may be ordered
   separately as  PB93-192854. System:  IBM  compatible; MS
   DOS operating  system. 480K  RAM required (550—  recom-
   mended). See also Region 1 - PB93-506111, Region 2 -
   PB93-506129,  Region  3  - PB93-506137, Region 4 - PB93-
  506145, Region 5 - PB93-506152, Region 6 - PB93-506160,
  Region 7 - PB93-506178, Region 8 - PB93-506186, Region 9
  - PB93-506194, Region 10 - PB93-506202. 1  diskette.
  Subject index keywords: Superfund, Data bases,  Software,
  SAID(Site Assessment  Information Directory).

0389  Site Assessment Information Directory (SAID)
  Region 8 (for Microcomputers). Date of Coverage:  1991
  Order Number PB93-506186CDH, price: DOS
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC; Oct 91
  The Site Assessment Information Directory (SAID) is a data-
  base of information  sources designed  to support  EPA Re-
  gional, state, and contractor staff in data collection efforts for
  site investigation activities. SAID is designed to assist  data
  collection activities,  especially  during  Preliminary Assess-
  ments (PAs) and  Site Inspections (Sis),  and to support
  Hazard Ranking system (HRS) package preparation. SAID
  entries are cross-referenced according to categories of infor-
  mation and geographical  areas and may be accessed  in a
  variety of ways. The SAID database system is supplemented
  by a User's Guide and EPA region  specific 'Phone book' list-
  ing of information sources.
  Specifications: The  datafile  is on one  3 1/2 inch  diskette,
  1.44M high density. Documentation included;  may be ordered
  separately as  PB93-213817. System:  IBM compatible; MS
  DOS  operating  system. 480K RAM required (550- recom-
  mended).  See also Region 1  - PB93-506111,  Region 2 -
  PB93-506129,  Region 3 - PB93-506137, Region 4 -  PB93-
  506145, Region 5 - PB93-506152,  Region 6  - PB93-506160,
  Region 7 - PB93-506178, Region 8 - PB93-506186, Region 9
  - PB93-506194, Region  10 - PB93-506202. 1 diskette.
  Subject index keywords: Superfund,  Data bases, Software,
  SAID(Site Assessment Information Directory).
                                                                                                              67

-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Assessment & Listing
0390  Site Assessment Information Directory (SAID)
  Region 9 (for Microcomputers). Date of Coverage:
  October 1991
  Order Number PB93-506194CDH, price: DOS
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC; Oct 91
  The Site Assessment Information Directory (SAID) is a data-
  base of information sources designed  to support EPA  Re-
  gional, state, and contractor staff in data collection efforts for
  site investigation activities. SAID is designed to assist data
  collection  activities, especially during  Preliminary  Assess-
  ments  (PAs)  and  Site  Inspections  (Sis),  and to support
  Hazard  Ranking  system (HRS) package preparation. SAID
  entries are cross-referenced according to categories of infor-
  mation and geographical areas and  may be accessed in  a
  variety of ways. The SAID database system is supplemented
  by a User's Guide and EPA region specific 'Phone book' list-
  ing of information sources.
  Specifications: The datafile  is on one 3 1/2 inch  diskette,
  1.44M high density. Documentation included; may be ordered
  separately as  PB93-213825. System:  IBM compatible;  MS
  DOS operating system.  480K RAM required (550- recom-
  mended).  See also Region  1  - PB93-506111, Region 2 -
  PB93-506129,  Region 3 -  PB93-506137, Region 4 - PB93-
  506145, Region 5 - PB93-506152,  Region 6 - PB93-506160,
  Region 7 - PB93-506178, Region 8 - PB93-506186, Region 9
  - PB93-506194, Region 10 - PB93-506202.  1 diskette.
  Subject index keywords:  Superfund, Data bases, Software,
  SAID(Site Assessment Information Directory).

0391  Site Assessment Information Directory (SAID)
  Region 10 (for Microcomputers). Date of Coverage:
  October 1991
  Order Number PB93-506202CDH, price: DOS
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC; Oct 91
  The Site Assessment  Information Directory (SAID) is a data-
  base of information sources designed to  support  EPA Re-
  gional, state, and contractor staff in data collection efforts for
  site  investigation activities. SAID is designed to assist  data
  collection activities,  especially  during Preliminary Assess-
  ments  (PAs) and Site Inspections (Sis), and  to support
  Hazard Ranking system (HRS) package preparation.  SAID
  entries are cross-referenced according to categories of infor-
  mation  and geographical areas and may be accessed in a
  variety of ways. The SAID  database system is supplemented
  by a User's Guide and EPA region specific 'Phone book' list-
  Ing of information sources.
  Specifications: The datafile is on one 31/2  inch diskette,
  1.44M high density. Documentation included; may be ordered
  separately as PB93-213833. System:  IBM  compatible; MS
  DOS operating system. 480K RAM  required (550— recom-
  mended). See  also  Region 1 - PB93-506111,  Region 2 -
  PB93-506129, Region 3 - PB93-506137, Region 4 - PB93-
  506145, Region 5 - PB93-506152, Region 6 - PB93-506160,
  Region 7 - PB93-506178, Region 8 - PB93-506186, Region 9
  - PB93-506194, Region 10 - PB93-506202. 1 diskette.
  Subject index keywords: Superfund,  Data bases,  Software,
  SAID(Site Assessment Information Directory).
0392  Standard Document for Remedial Site Assessment
  Decisions
  Order Number PB93-963288CDH, price: PC A01/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 8 Dec 92
  The National Contingency Plan (NCP) requires the U.S. Envi-
  ronmental Protection  Agesncy (EPA) to assess all releases
  and threatened releases throughout the United States pursu-
  ant to the Comprehensive Environmental Response,  Com-
  pensation and Liability Act of 1980 (CERCLA), as amended.
  In accordance with the NCP, EPA conducts PAs and Sis to
  assess sites  where releases or  threatened releases may
  exist  After evaluating information collected during a PA or
  SI, EPA then  decides on the need for further investigative or
  response action. All Regions document remedial site assess-
  ment  decisions, but procedures vary. To ensure  adequate
  documentation of  such decisions, the site assessment pro-
  gram  has developed a  standard  site assessment decision
  sheet.
  Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
  posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
  and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
  paper copy or microfiche. 4p.
  Subject  index keywords: Superfund, Hazardous  materials,
  Waste disposal.
0393  Superfund Fact Sheet: Exposure Pathways
  Order Number PB93-963306CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Sep 92
  The fact sheet describes exposure pathways, the different
  manners in which people can be exposed to hazardous ma-
  terials. Explanations  of  several pathways involving surface
  waters, ground water,  air, soil, and the food chain are given.
  The fact  sheet is one in a series providing reference informa-
  tion about Superfund issues and is intended for readers with
  no formal scientific training.
  Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
  posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
  and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
  paper copy or microfiche. 8p.
  Subject  index keywords!: Environmental exposure pathway,
  Path of pollutants, Hazardous materials, Public health, Super-
  fund.
 0394  Supplemental Guide to Video on Superfund Site
  Assessment Screening: A National Priority
  Order Number PB93-963323CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Jan 93
  EPA's Superfund  program uses a systematic site assessment
  screening process to determine which hazardous waste sites
  should be considered a national priority. The site assessment
  screening process is  an objective, methodical process that
  follows established procedures and uses a uniform set of de-
  cision-making criteria. The video  is intended for state, EPA,
  or contractor  personnel  who  perform  site  assessment
  screening for Superfund. The video gives an overview of the
   Superfund site assessment screening process and provides
  those performing the  tasks an overall understanding of their
  work.
   Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
   posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
 68

-------
                                                               PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Compliance With
                                                                                                    Other Laws
  and Mexico; ail others $400). Single copies also available in
  paper copy or microfiche. 63p.
  Subject index keywords: Superfund, Site surveys, Risk as-
  sessment.

 0395 Update No. 2 to 'Procedures for Completion and
  Deletion of NPL Sites'
  Order Number PB92-963344CDH, price: PC A01/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Emergency and Remedial Response; 19 Feb 92
  The purpose of the directive is to  revise EPA guidance to
  clarify the distinction between the terms 'site completion' and
  'construction completion.'
  Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
  posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
  and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
  paper copy or microfiche. 5p.
  Subject  index  keywords:  Hazardous materials,  Pollution
  control, Superfund.


 PROGRAM  IMPLEMENTATION:

 Compliance With Other Laws

 0396 ARAR's Q's and A's. Compliance with the Toxicity
  Characteristics Rule. Part 1
  Order  Number PB90-273814CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Emergency and Remedial Response; May  90
  The document is a  part  of a series of fact sheets that pro-
  vide answers to questions that arose  in developing applica-
  ble or relevant and appropriate  requirements  (ARARs) poli-
  cies, training sessions, and in identifying and  complying with
  ARARs at specific sites. The sheet addresses  compliance
  with the recently promulgated Toxicity Characteristics  Rule
  (55 FR 11798, March 29, 1990).
  Specifications: 6p.
  Subject  index keywords: Project management, Hazardous
  materials, Toxicity,  Superfund,  Office  of  Solid Waste and
  Emergency  Response, Waste management, Remedial action.

0397  ARARs Fact Sheet: Compliance  with the Clean Air
  Act and  Associated Air  Quality Requirements
  Order Number PB92-963282CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington,  DC. Office of
  Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Sep 92
  The fact  sheet provides updated guidance on compliance
  with the Clean Air Act, as amended November 1990 (42  USC
  7401 et.  seq.) and related air quality rules under other envi-
  ronmental statutes.  It also addresses  developing  applicable
  or  relevant  and appropriate requirements (ARARs)  policies
  and identifying and complying with ARARs at  specific  sites.
  Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, De-
  posit account required (minimum  deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
  and Mexico; all others $400). Single  copies also available in
  paper copy or microfiche. 30p.
  Subject  index keywords: Superfund,  Waste  management,
  Hazardous materials, Air pollution abatement, Office  of Solid
  Waste  and Emergency Response.
 0398  ARARs Q's and A's
   Order Number PB90-273780CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
   Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
   Emergency and  Remedial Response; May 89
   The document is part of a series of fact sheets that provide
   answers to questions that arose in developing applicable or
   relevant and appropriate  requirements  (ARARs)  policies,
   training sessions, and  in  identifying  and complying with
   ARARs at specific  sites.  Responses  covered in  the fact
   sheet reflect  current program practice and include  policies
   and language from the proposed National Contingency Plan
   (NCP).
   Specifications:  7p.
   Subject index keywords: Project management, Hazardous
   materials,  Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response,
   Superfund, Remedial action,  Remedial   response, Waste
   management.

 0399  ARARS Q's and A's: Compliance with Federal Water
   Quality Criteria
   Order Number PB90-274267CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
   Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
   Emergency and  Remedial Response; Jun 90
   The document is part of a series of fact sheets that provide
   answers to questions that arose in developing  applicable or
   relevant and  appropriate  requirements  (ARARs)  policies,
   training  sessions,  and  in  identifying and complying with
   ARARs  at specific sites. The sheet addresses compliance
   with Federal Water Quality Criteria as ARARs.
   Specifications:  See also PB90-273780. 11 p.
   Subject index  keywords:  Hazardous  materials,  Project
   management,  Water  quality, Superfund, Waste management,
   Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response.
 0400  ARARs Q's and A's Compliance with New SDWA
   National Primary Drinking Water Regulations for Organic
   and Inorganic Chemicals
   Order Number PB91-921363CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
   Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
   Emergency and Remedial Response; Jul 91
  The report provides guidance on questions that arose in de-
  veloping ARAR  policies, and in indentifying and complying
  with ARARs at specific sites concerning the new Safe Drink-
  ing Water Regulations (Phase II), which were promulgated on
  January 30, 1991.
  Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
  posit account required (minimum deposit $150 U.S., Canada,
  and Mexico; all others $300). Single copies also available in
  paper copy or  microfiche. 7p.
  Subject: index  keywords:  Water  quality,  Drinking water,
  Water pollution, Superfund.
0401  ARARs Q's and A's: Genera! Policy, RCRA, CWA,
  SDWA, Post-ROD  Information, and Contingent Waivers
  Order Number PB91-921341CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Emergency and Remedial Response; Jul 91
  These 'ARARs Q's and A's' are part of  a series  of Fact
  Sheets  that provide guidance on a number of question that
  arose in developing ARAR policies, in ARARs  training ses-
  sion, and in identifying and complying with ARARs at specific
  sites. This particular Q's and A's  Fact Sheet updates and re-
  places a Fact Sheet which was first issued in May 1989.
                                                                                                            69

-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Compliance With
Other Laws
  Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
  posit account required (minimum deposit $150 U.S., Canada,
  and Mexico;  all others $300). Single copies also available in
  paper copy or microfiche. 7p.
  Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
  Hazardous materials, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
  Response.

0402  ARARs Q's and A's: State Ground-Water
  Antidegradation Issues
  Order Number PB91-921311CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Emergency and Remedial Response; Jul 90
  The Fact Sheet discusses, section 121(d)(2) of  CERCLA, as
  amended by the 1986  Superfund Amendments and Reau-
  thorization Act (SARA),  requires that remedial actions  must
  at least attain Federal and more stringent State  applicable or
  relevant and appropriate requirements (ARARs) upon com-
  pletion of the remedial action. The Q's and A's  fact sheet is
  designed to  provide guidance on the status of State ground-
  water antidegradation  provisions  as  potential  ARARs for
  CERCLA ground-water and soil remedial actions. The  guid-
  ance  in the  fact sheet reiterates Agency policy already in
  practice In EPA's Regional offices. The goal and policy of the
  Superfund program is to return usable ground water to  its
  beneficial uses within the timeframe that is reasonable, given
  the particular circumstances of the site. In addition to their
  goal of ground-water cleanup, Superfund has a nondegrada-
  tion policy in that they  strive for the prevention of further
  degradation  of the ground water during their  remedial ac-
  tions. However, it should be noted that more stringent State
  standards than those imposed by EPA policy may  be im-
  posed by State antidegradation requirements. Such State re-
  quirements,  if they have been determined to be ARARs for
  the site, would have to be met (e.g., by meeting the dis-
  charge requirements)  or waived (e.g., by the interim remedy
  waiver). Nevertheless, even where temporary degradation of
  the ground water may be required during the remedial action,
  they will provide protection by restricting access or providing
  institutional controls, and EPA response actions will ultimate-
  ly result in restoration of the ground water's beneficial uses.
  Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
  posit  account required (minimum deposit $150 U.S., Canada,
  and Mexico; all others $300). Single copies also available in
  paper copy or microfiche. 9p.
  Subject index keywords: Superfund, Hazardous  materials,
  Water  pollution   abatement, Land  pollution  abatement,
  Ground water, Waste management, Applicable or Relevant
  and  Appropriate  Requirements, Office of Solid Waste and
  Emergency Response.
 0403  ARARs Q's and A's: The Fund-Balancing Waiver
  Order Number PB91-921321CDH, price: PC A01/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Emergency and Remedial Response; Jan 91
  The fact sheet implements the applicable or relevant and ap-
  propriate requirements  (ARARs) provisions  EPA has devel-
  oped guidance and provided training to Regions and States
  on the identification of and compliance with ARARs. It is part
  of a series that provide guidance on a number of  questions
  that arose in developing ARARs policies, in ARARs  training
  sessions,  and  in  identifying  and complying with ARARs at
  specific sites. The fact  sheet addresses the Fund-balancing
  waiver.
  Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
  posit account required (minimum deposit $150 U.S., Canada,
  and Mexico; all others $300). Single copies also available in
  paper copy or microfiche. 5p.
  Subject index keywords:  Superfund, Waste management,
  Hazardous materials, Applicable or Relevant and Appropriate
  Requirements, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Re-
  sponse, Fund-balancing waivers.

0404  CERCLA Compliance with Other Environmental
  Statutes
  Order Number PB91-214098CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 2 Oct 85
  The directive sets forth the Environmental Protection Agency
  (EPA) policy on the applicability of the standards,  criteria,
  advisories, and guidance of other State and Federal environ-
  mental  and public health statutes to actions taken pursuant
  to sections 104 and  106 of the Comprehensive Environmen-
  tal  Response, Compensation,  and  Liability  Act  of  1980
  (CERCLA). The policy addresses considerations for on-site
  and off-site actions taken under CERCLA.
  Specifications:  Portions of this document are not fully legi-
  ble. 22p.
  Subject index keywords:  Superfund, Waste management,
  Hazardous materials, Office of  Emergency and Remedial Re-
  sponse.

0405  CERCLA Compliance with Other Laws Manual:
  CERCLA Compliance wilth State Requirements
  Order Number PB90-272543CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Emergency and Remedial Response; Dec 89
  The fact sheet provides a guide to chapter 6 of Part II of the
  'CERCLA Compliance with Other Laws Manual.' The fifth in a
  series,  this fact sheet discusses CERCLA compliance with
  State requirements, based on  policies in proposed revisions
  to the National Contingency Plan.
  Specifications: See also PB90-272535. 8p.
  Subject index keywords:  Project  management, Superfund,
  Office  of Solid Waste and Emergency Response, National
  contingency plan.

0406   CERCLA Compliance with Other Laws Manual:
  CERCLA Compliance with the CWA and SDWA
  Order Number PB90-273806CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Emergency and Remedial Response; Feb 90
  The fact sheet provides a guide to Chapters 3 and 4 of Part I
  of the  'CERCLA  Compliance  with Other Laws Manual.' The
  sixth in a series,  the fact sheet focuses on CERCLA compli-
  ance with the Clean Water Act (Chapter 3), and Safe Drink-
  ing Water Act (Chapter 4), and discusses other statutes with
  provisions relevant to surface water or drinking water.
  Specifications: 10p.
  Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Guidelines,
  Project management, Superfund, Waste management, Office
  of Solid Waste and Emergency Response.
 70

-------
                                                              PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Compliance With
                                                                                                   Other Laws
0407 CERCLA Compliance with Other Laws Manual:
  Guide to Manual
  Order Number PB90-274242CDH, price: PC A01/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 89
  The document serves as a guide to the use of the 'CERCLA
  Compliance with  Other Laws Manual.' Second in a series,
  the Fact Sheet  discusses implementation of Applicable  or
  Relevant and Appropriate Requirements (ARARs) provisions
  in  the proposed revisions to the National Contingency Plan
  (NCP).
  Specifications:  See also PB90-148461 and PB90-272535
  4p.
  Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Guidelines,
  Project management, Superfund, Waste management, Office
  of  Solid Waste and Emergency Response.

0408 CERCLA Compliance with Other Laws Manual:
  Overview of ARARs - Focus on ARAR Waivers
  Order Number PB90-273798CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Emergency and Remedial Response; Dec 89
  The fact sheet summarizes Chapter I Part I of the 'CERCLA
  Compliance With Other Laws Manual: Part I.' The third in a
  series, the fact sheet provides an overview of Applicable  or
  Relevant and Appropriate Requirements (ARARs) based on
  policies  in proposed revisions to the  National  Contingency
  Plan (NCP).
  Specifications: 8p.
  Subject  index  keywords:  Hazardous materials,  Project
 : management, Superfund, Office of Solid Waste and Emer-
  gency Response, Waste management, Comprehensive Envi-
  ronmental Response Compensation and  Liability Act, Reme-
  dial action.

0409  CERCLA Compliance with Other Laws Manual. Part
  1. Interim Final
  Order Number PB90-272535CDH, price: PC A11/MF A02
  IGF, Inc., Fairfax, VA.; Environmental Protection Agency,
  Washington, DC. Office of Emergency and Remedial  .
  Response; 8 Aug 88
  The manual is developed to provide  guidance to Remedial
  Project Managers  (RPMs), State personnel at State-lead Su-
  perfund sites, On-Scene Coordinators (OSCs), and other per-
  sons  responsible  for planning response actions  under the
  Comprehensive  Environmental   Response,  Compensation,
  and Liability Act  (CERCLA). The guidance is  intended to
  assist in the selection of on-site remedial actions that meet
  the applicable,  or relevant and appropriate  requirements
  (ARARs) of the Resource  Conservation and Recovery Act
  (RCRA),  Clean Water Act (CWA), Safe  Drinking Water Act
  (SDWA), Clean Air Act  (CAA), and other Federal  and  State
  environmental laws as required by CERCLA.
  Specifications:  See also PB90-272550. Sponsored by Envi-
  ronmental  Protection Agency,  Washington, DC.  Office of
  Emergency and Remedial Response. 244p.
  Subject  index keywords: Manuals, Laws, Pollution regula-
  tion, Remedial action, Remedial response, Waste manage-
  ment.
0410  CERCLA Compliance with Other Laws Manual:
  RCRA ARARS-Focus on Closure Requirements
  Order Number PB90-274259CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Emergency and Remedial Response; Oct 89
  The document serves as a guide to the use of the 'CERCLA
  Compliance with  Other  Laws Manual: Parts I  and II.' The
  fourth in a series, the Fact Sheet addresses compliance with
  Subtitle C of the  Resource  Conservation  and Recovery Act
  (RCRA), as amended by the Hazardous and  Solid Waste
  Amendments of 1984, with a focus on the RCRA Subtitle C
  disclosure requirements.
  Specifications: See also PB90-273798. 9p.
  Subject  index  keywords:  Hazardous  materials,  Project
  management, Superfund, Waste management, Office of Solid
  Waste and Emergency  Response, Resource Conservation
  and Recovery Act.

0411  CERCLA Compliance with Other Laws Manual:
  Summary and Part 2. CAA, TSCA, and Other Statutes
  Order Number PB90-272550CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Emergency and Remedial Response; Apr 90
  The fact sheet provides a guide to Chapters 2 and 3 of Part
  II of the  'CERCLA Compliance With  Other  Laws Manual.'
  The sixth  in a  series, this fact sheet focuses  on CERCLA
  compliance with the Clean  Air Act (CAA), the Toxic Sub-
  stances  Control Act (TSCA),  and the Federal Insecticide,
  Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act. In addition,  it discusses
  other  statutes  that set  standards  for radioactive  wastes,
  mining wastes,  and other resource protection statutes that
  are potential Applicable or Relevant  and Appropriate Re-
  quirements (ARARs) for CERCLA actions.
  Specifications: See also PB90-272543. 11 p.
  Subject  index keywords: Project management, Superfund,
  Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response.

0412  CERCLA Compliance with the RCRA Toxicity
  Characteristics (TC) Rule: Part 2
  Order Number PB91-921309CDH, price: PC A01/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Emergency and Remedial Response; Oct 90
  The Fact Sheet discusses CERCLA remedial actions which
  must comply with  the requirements of the  Resource Conser-
  vation and Recovery Act (RCRA) when they are determined
  to  be applicable  or relevant and appropriate requirements
  (ARARs) unless a waiver is justified.  For RCRA Subtitle  C
  hazardous waste requirements to be applicable, the CERCLA
  response  action must constitute  either treatment, storage,
  transport, or disposal of a RCRA hazardous waste. There-
  fore,  to make determinations about the applicability or rel-
  evance and appropriateness of  RCRA requirements, site
  managers  need to  understand how to identify whether  a
  CERCLA waste  is  a RCRA hazardous waste (including  when
  a waste exhibits the newly promulgated toxicity characteris-
  tics (TC)). The purpose of the guide, the second dealing with
  the TC rule (see ARARs Qs  & As, Compliance with the Tox-
  icity Characteristics  Rule: Part  I,  May  1990,  Publication
  9234.2-08FS) is to provide a general framework for  manag-
  ing CERCLA  wastes in accordance with  the new require-
  ments.
  Specifications:  Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
  posit account required (minimum deposit $150 U.S., Canada,
                                                                                                            71

-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Compliance With
Other Laws
  and Mexico; all others $300). Single copies also available in
  paper copy or microfiche. 5p.
  Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
  Hazardous materials, Remedial  action,  Toxic  substances,
  Office of Solid Waste and  Emergency Response,  Compre-
  hensive Environmental Response Compensation and Liability
  Act

0413  CERCLA (Comprehensive Environmental Response,
  Compensation and Liability Act) Compliance with Other
  Laws Manual: Part 2. Clean Air Act and Other
  Environmental Statutes and State Requirements
  Order Number PB90-148461CDH, price: PC A09/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Aug 89
  The purpose of the  CERCLA Compliance with Other Laws
  Manual is to  assist  Remedial  Project Managers (RPMs) in
  identifying and complying with all applicable or relevant and
  appropriate requirements (ARARs) for  remedial actions taken
  at Superfund  sites. This part of the  guidance manual  ad-
  dresses CERCLA compliance  with the Clean Air  Act and
  other environmental statutes for remedial actions.
  Specifications:  176p.
  Subject index keywords: Statutes, Environmental impacts,
  States(United  States).
0414  CERCLA Off-Site Policy - Eligibility of Facilities in
  Assessment Monitoring
  Order Number PB90-249632CDH, price: PC A01/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Emergency and Remedial Response; 28 Jul 86
  The  directive clarifies  application  of the CERCLA off-site
  policy to  RCRA commercial facilities in assessment monitor-
  ing.
  Specifications:  5p.
  Subject index keywords: Regulations, Facilities, Superfund,
  Remedial action,  Office  of Solid Waste and Emergency Re-
  sponse, Assessment monitoring, Businesses.
0415  CERCLA Off-Site Policy: Providing Notice to
  Facilities
  Order Number PB90-249624CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 12 May 86
  The directive assists in providing notice to commercial treat-
  ment, storage, and disposal (TSDs) facilities deemed ineligi-
  ble to  receive CERCLA response  wastes.  Outlines proce-
  dures for facilities to submit written comments on the appli-
  cation of the policy to the conditions  alleged at their facility.
  Specifications:  8p.
  Subject index keywords: Regulations, Waste disposal,  Su-
  perfund, Remedial action, Office of Solid Waste and Emer-
  gency Response.
0416  CERCLA Removal Actions at Methane Release Sites
  Order Number PB91-190850CDH, price: PC A01/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC.  Office of
  Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 23 Jan 86
  The directive clarifies OERR policy on the appropriateness of
  removal actions at methane gas release sites under authority
  of CERCLA. CERCLA responses to  methane gas releases
  should  be carefully evaluated on a case-by-case basis. Al-
  though the proposed  removal action is authorized under
  CERCLA 104(a)(1), the responsible party may not be liable
  under section 107 for removal action costs.
  Specifications:  4p.
  Subject index keywords;: Air  pollution control, Superfund,
  Waste disposal,  Methane, Office of Solid Waste and Emer-
  gency Response.

0417  Compendium of CERCLA ARARs fact sheets and
  directives
  Order Number DE92004878CDH, price: PC A12/MF A03
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Emergency and Remedial Response. USDOE Assistant
  Secretary for Environment, Safety, and Health, Washington,
  DC (United States). Office of Environmental Guidance; Oct
  91
  Section  121  (d) of the Comprehensive Environmental Re-
  sponse Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA) as amend-
  ed by the  Superfund Amendments and  Reauthorization Act
  of 1986 (SARA), requires attainment  of Federal and State
  applicable  and   relevant and  appropriate requirements
  (ARARs). Subparts E,  Section  300.400(g) "Identification  of
  applicable  or relevant and appropriate requirements" of the
  National Oil and Hazardous Substances  Pollution Contingen-
  cy Plan (NCP) (55 CFR 8666, March 8,  1990) describes the
  process for attaining ARARs. The purpose of this compendi-
  um is to provide you with a complete  and current source of
  "Quick Reference Fact Sheets" and Directives on applicable
  and relevant and appropriate requirements (ARARs). These
  fact sheets provide overviews  of  the ARARs for CERCLA
  cleanup actions. The Compendium of  CERCLA ARARs con-
  sists of seven (7) chapters: lists of general fact sheets that
  provide introductory information on ARARs;  Chapter 2 dis-
  cusses air emissions from Superfund air strippers; Chapter 3
  deals with Indian Tribal involvement  in the  Superfund pro-
  gram; Chapter 4 discusses soil lead cleanup levels at Super-
  fund sites; Chapter 5 discusses the risk associated with Su-
  perfund cleanups; Chapter 6 contains  four sections that dis-
  cuss a variety of RCRA ARARs such as general guidance
  topics, land disposal restrictions, Superfund LDR guides, and
  toxicity characteristics; and finally, Chapter 7  contains a vari-
  ety of ARAR fact sheets and directives on Wastewater, Safe
  Drinking Water Act and Groundwater.
  Specifications:  254p.
  Subject index  keywords:  Pollution  Laws,  US  Superfund,
  Remedial Action, Waste Management.

0418  Compliance with Third Third Requirements Under
  the LDRs. Superfund LDR Guide No. 8
  Order Number PB91-921313CDH, price: PC A01/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Emergency and Remedial Response; Oct 90
  The 1984  Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA)
  require EPA to  promulgate  regulations restricting the land
  disposal of RCRA hazardous wastes. EPA previously promul-
  gated regulations restricting the land disposal of solvent- and
  dioxin-containing, California list, First Third, and Second Third
  wastes. The  Guide (the eigth in a series of LDR guides pre-
  pared by the Office of Emergency and  Remedial Response
  (OERR)) summarizes the key provisions of  the Third Third
  LDR rule  and discusses  potential implications for CERCLA
  response  actions. More detailed guidance on Superfund
  compliance with the LDRs is being prepared  by the Office of
  Solid Waste and Emergency Response (OSWER).
72

-------
                                                               PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Compliance With
                                                                                                     Other Laws
  Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
  posit account required (minimum deposit $150 U.S., Canada,
  and Mexico; all others $300). Single copies also  available in
  paper copy or microfiche. 4p.
  Subject index keywords: Superfund, Guidelines, Hazardous
  materials, Waste treatment, Remedial action.

0419 Consideration of ARARs during Removal Actions
  Order Number PB92-963410CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Emergency and Remedial Response; Apr 92
  The fact sheet summarizes  a Superfund Removal Proce-
  dures (SRP) volume entitled  'Guidance on the Consideration
  of ARARs During Removal Actions' which describes the es-
  sential components of applicable or relevant and  appropriate
  requirements (ARARs) for on-site removal actions, including
  identification of potential Federal and State ARARs, determi-
  nation of when compliance with ARARs is not required, and
  documentation of ARARs evaluations.
  Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
  posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
  and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
  paper copy or microfiche. See also PB92-963401. 6p.
  Subject index  keywords: Hazardous materials, Removal,
  Superfund.

0420 Consideration of RCRA Requirements in Performing
  CERCLA Responses  at Mining Waste Sites
  Order Number PB91-214205CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Emergency and Remedial Response; 19 Aug 86
  The directive discusses mining wastes which will not be reg-
  ulated under Subtitle C of RCRA. Mining waste problems will
  be addressed by developing  a program for regulation under
  Subtitle D. In the interim, Superfund will continue to address
  these  mining waste problems through the  RI/FS  and ROD/
  EDO processes taking into account current Subtitle D re-
  quirements  as well as options for addressing risks not ad-
  dressed by Subtitle D requirements.
  Specifications:  Portions of this document are not fully legi-
  ble. 13p.
  Subject  index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
  Mine wastes, Hazardous materials, Office of Solid  Waste and
  Emergency Response.

0421  Discharge of Wastewater from CERCLA Sites into
  POTWS
  Order Number PB90-249616CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Emergency and Remedial Response; 15 Apr 86
  The directive addresses  the concerns and issues unique to
  publicly owned treatment works (POTWs) that must be evalu-
  ated  before the discharge of  CERCLA  wastewater to  a
  POTW.
  Specifications:  8p.
  Subject index keywords: Regulations, Waste water, Waste
  disposal, Superfund, Remedial action, Publicly owned treat-
  ment works, Office of  Solid Waste  and Emergency  Re-
•  sponse.
 0422  Guide to Delisting of RCRA Wastes for Superfund
   Remedial Responses
   Order Number PB90-274374CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
   Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
   Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 90
   The fact sheet discusses the circumstances under which  de-
   listing wastes may be appropriate, and the procedures  for
   delisting a Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA)
   hazardous waste as part of a Superfund remedial response.
   Specifications: 9p.
   Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials,  Guidelines,
   Superfund, Waste management,  Office of Solid  Waste and
   Emergency Response, Remedial response.

 0423 Guide to Discharging CERCLA Aqueous Wastes to
   Publicly Owned Treatment Works (POTWs)
   Order Number PB91-921364CDH, price: PC A01/MF A01
   Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
   Emergency and  Remedial Response; Mar 91
   The guide provides quick reference to the statutory,  policy,
   administrative, and technical factors involved  in discharging
   aqueous wastes generated during  Superfund response  ac-
   tions to  a POTW.
   Specifications:  Paper copy available on Standing Order,  de-
   posit account required (minimum deposit,$150 U.S., Canada,
   and Mexico; all others $300). Single copies also available in
   paper copy or microfiche. 5p.
   Subject index keywords: Waste disposal, Waste treatment,
   Hazardous materials, Superfund.

 0424 Guide to Obtaining No Migration Variances for
   CERCLA Remedial Actions
   Order Number PB91-921367CDH, price: PC A01/MF A01
   Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office  of
   Emergency and Remedial Response; Apr 91
  A  'No Migration' Variance allows land disposal of restricted
  wastes not meeting the LDR treatment standards in a specif-
  ic  unit. The guide outlines procedures for obtaining a No  Mi-
  gration Variance for RCRA hazardous wastes  as part of a
  CERCLA response when the LDRs are ARAR.
  Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
  posit account required (minimum deposit $150 U.S., Canada,
  and Mexico; all others $300). Single copies also available in
  paper copy or microfiche. 5p.
  Subject  index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste dis-
  posal, Waste treatment, Superfund.
0425 Hazardous Waste Operations and Emergency
  Response: Uncontrolled Hazardous Waste Sites and
  RCRA Corrective Actions
  Order Number PB91-921339CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office  of
  Emergency and Remedial Response; Apr 91
  The purpose of the Fact Sheet is to explain the principle  re-
  quirements of the EPA and OSHA worker protection stand-
  ards as  they apply to  employees engaged  in  hazardous
  waste operations at uncontrolled  hazardous waste sites,  in-
  cluding employees who perform corrective actions at RCRA
 TSD facilities.
  Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
  posit account required (minimum deposit $150 U.S.,  Canada,
  and Mexico; all others $300). Single copies also available in
  paper copy or microfiche. 16p.
                                                                                                             73

-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Compliance With
Other Laws
  Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
  Hazardous materials, Occupational safety and health, Office
  of Solid Waste and Emergency Response.

0426  Homeowners Exempted from Superfund Cleanup
  Costs: National Policy Overview
  Order Number PB92-963336CDH, price: PC A01 /MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Emergency and Remedial Response; Nov 91
  The USEPA  has established a national  policy declaring the
  average homeowner will not be required to conduct or pay
  for cleanup when residential property is part of a federal Su-
  perfund site. The national  policy and guideline clarifies Su-
  perfund's liability system which maintains owners and opera-
  tors of properties in need of federal  cleanup action  are po-
  tentially liable for those actions.  EPA may hold homeowners
  liable  for cleanup where their own actions have led to a re-
  lease  or threatened release of hazardous substances requir-
  ing a cleanup of their property, or where the property is used
  for non-residential purpose. The policy is designed to allevi-
  ate concerns about cleanup liability for homeowners, as well
  as parties involved in real estate transactions, such as lend-
  ers and title insurers.
  Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
  posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
  and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available  in
  paper copy or microfiche. 5p.
  Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Residential
  buildings, Liabilities, Pollution control,  Superfund, Cleanup.

0427  Interim RCRA/CERCLA Guidance on Non-
  Contiguous Sites and On-Site Management on Waste
  and Treatment Residue
  Order Number PB90-274317CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Emergency and Remedial Response;  27 Mar 86
  The directive presents interim guidance with respect to com-
  bined treatment of CERCLA waste from non-contiguous loca-
  tions; on-site disposal of  treatment residue; limitations  on
  construction  of  hazardous  waste incinerators for on-site
  CERCLA use, and off-site treatment of waste and  redisposal
  on site.
  Specifications:  11 p.
  Subject index keywords: Hazardous  materials,  Guidelines,
  Project management, Waste treatment,  Superfund, Office  of
  Solid  Waste and Emergency Response, Waste management,
  Remedial action.
0428  Land Disposal Restrictions as  Relevant and
  Appropriate Requirements for CERCLA Contaminated
  Soil and Debris
  Order Number PB91-214973CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Emergency and Remedial Response; 5 Jun 89
  Until  a rulemaking is  completed that establishes treatment
  standards for soil and debris, OSWER has concluded that
  Land Disposal Restrictions (LDRs) generally should not be
  considered as relevant and appropriate for soil or debris that
  does not contain restricted  RCRA wastes. The directive
  gives suggested language to be incorporated into feasibility
  study. For further clarification, the directive has included  as
  an attachment, directive 9347.1-02.
  Specifications:  13p.
  Subject index keywords:  Superfund, Waste  management,
  Hazardous materials,  Land Disposal  Restrictions, Office  of
  Solid Waste and Emergency Response.

0429  Notification of Out-of-State Shipments of Superfund
  Site Wastes
  Order Number PB90-272618CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington,  DC. Office of
  Emergency and Remedial Response; 14 Sep 89
  The directive implements EPA's  policy that prior to the off-
  site shipment of Superfund site wastes to an out-of-State
  management facility,  EPA  Regional  personnel will  provide
  notice to that State's environmental officials.
  Specifications:  6p.
  Subject index keywords: Interstate transportation,  Super-
  fund, Waste management, Office of Solid Waste and Emer-
  gency Response, Hazardous materials transportation.

0430  Obtaining a Soil and Debris Treatability Variance for
  Removal Actions. Superfund LDR Guide No. 6B
  Order Number PB91-921310CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington,  DC. Office of
  Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 90
  The Office of Emergency and Remedial Response  (OERR)
  issued a series of Superfund LDR Guides in July and Decem-
  ber of 1989. Since the issuance of these guides, the Environ-
  mental Protection Agency, with cooperation from outside par-
  ties (e.g., environmental  groups, industry representatives),
  has conducted an analysis of the potential impacts associat-
  ed with  applying  the LDR treatment standards to Superfund
  and RCRA Corrective Action cleanups. As a result of these
  analyses, it was decided that they Agency will promulgate a
  third  set of  treatment  standards (in  addition  to  the
  wastewater and nonwastewater categories currently in effect)
  specifically for soil and debris wastes. In the interim, there is
  the presumption that CERCLA response actions involving the
  placement of soil and  debris contaminated with RCRA  re-
  stricted  wastes will utilize a Treatability Variance to  comply
  with the LDRs and that, under these variances, the treatment
  levels outlined in Superfund LDR Guide 6B will serve as al-
  ternative 'treatment standards' for removal action. The guide
  has been prepared to outline the process for obtaining and
  complying with a Treatability Variance for soil and debris that
  are contaminated with  RCRA hazardous wastes until such
  time that the Agency promulgates  treatment standards  for
  soil and debris.
  Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
  posit account required (minimum deposit $150 U.S., Canada,
  and Mexico; all  others $300). Single  copies also available in
  paper copy or microfiche. 6p.
  Subject index  keywords:  Debris, Superfund, Waste treat-
  ment, Hazardous materials, Guidelines, Remedial action,  Soil
  contamination.

 0431  Off-Site Policy: RFA or Equivalent Investigation
  Requirement at RCRA Treatment and Storage Facilities
  Order Number PB91-139295CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 4 Jan  88
  The directive discusses the modification of   RFA criterion
  (need to have an  RFA completed) for subtitle C treatment
  and storage facilities. The requirements were phased in over
  a period to end 6/1/88.
 74

-------
                                                                 PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Compliance With
                                                                                                      Other Laws
   Specifications: 7p.
   Subject index keywords: Waste management, Superfund,
   Hazardous materials, Office of Solid Waste and Emerqencv
   Response.

 0432  Overview of Selected EPA (Environmental
   Protection Agency) Regulations and Guidance Affecting
   POTW (Publicly Owned Treatment Works) Management
   Order Number PB90-129263CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
   Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
   the Assistant Administrator for Water; Sep 89
   The information in the document is meant only as a summary
   of some of the regulations and guidance that may apply to
   publicly  owned  treatment works  (POTW)  operations.  The
   document does not provide a comprehensive overview of all
   applicable federal requirements. Use of the document should
   not replace reference to official regulations as  published in
   the Federal Register or the Code of Federal Regulations or
   to other  more specific guidance documents. Also, the reader
   should be aware that EPA continuously updates and revises
   its regulations in response to statutory amendments or to  im-
   prove  its regulatory program. Finally, POTWs are reminded
   that the  Clean Water Act allows states and municipalities to
   impose more stringent requirements on National Pollutant
   Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permittees than are
   required  under federal law.  Therefore, EPA suggests that the
   reader contact the appropriate authorities to get sources of
   detailed guidance for specific situations.
   Specifications: 31 p.
   Subject  index keywords:  Hazardous materials,  Sewers,  In-
   dustrial wastes, Pollution regulations, Publicly owned treat-
   ment works, Toxic substances.

0433  Overview of the Off-Site Policy for OSCs and RPMs
   Order Number PB92-963603CDH, price: PC A01/MF A01
   Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
   Emergency and  Remedial Response; Oct 91
   The fact  sheet provides essential information for On Scene
   Coordinators  (OSCs)   and  Remedial   Project  Managers
   (RPMs) for the implementation of the Off-site Policy. The fact
  sheet includes an overview of the Policy, helpful reminders
  and a list of the Regional Off-site contacts.
  Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
  posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
  and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also  available in
  paper copy or microfiche. 2p.
  Subject index keywords:  Superfund, Waste management
  Hazardous materials, Office of Solid Waste  and  Emergency
  Response.

0434  PAST: The Potential ARARs Selection Tool
  Order Number PB92-152941CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
  Computer Sciences Corp., Cincinnati, OH.; Environmental
  Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk Reduction
  Engineering Lab; 1992
  The 1986 Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization Act
  (SARA) specified that  any remedial  actions at Superfund
  sites must comply with applicable or relevant and appropriate
  regulations (ARARS), including Federal, state, and local envi-
  ronmental statutes. Identifying these legal requirements for a
  particular  hazardous waste site can be a complex and time
  consuming process. The EPA Risk Reduction Engineering
  Research  Laboratory is  developing  a  prototype knowledge-
  based  system to aid in screening regulations that determine
   clean-up requirements based on unique site characteristics.
   The decision  logic follows that presented in the EPA docu-
   ments such as CERCLA Compliance with Other Laws Manu-
   als (Part I  and II).  Hence,  it takes  into consideration  the
   chemicals at the site, the particular location features of the
   site, and the proposed remediations methods.
   Specifications:  Pub. in HMCRI's Annual National Confer-
   ence Proceedings (12th), Hazardous Materials Control/Su-
   perfund  '92, December 3-5, 1991, Washington,  DC., p632-
   636.  See also PB90-272535  and PB90-148461. Sponsored
   by Environmental  Protection  Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk
   Reduction Engineering Lab. 7p.
   Subject index keywords: Superfund, Hazardous materials,
   Pollution regulations, Waste  management, Remedial  action,
   Expert  systems,  Applicable  or  Relevant and Appropriate
   Regulations, PAST system.

 0435  Permits and Permit 'Equivalency' Processes for
   CERCLA On-Site Response Actions
   Order Number PB93-963325CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
   Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
   Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 19 Feb 92
   The directive is intended to  clarify the EPA policy with  re-
   spect to  attaining permits for activities  at Comprehensive En-
   vironmental  Response  Compensation   and  Liability  Act
   (CERCLA) sites.
   Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
   posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
   and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
   paper copy or microfiche. 7p.
   Subject  index  keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
   Hazardous materials, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
   Response.

0436 Policy for Superfund Compliance with the RCRA
   Land Disposal  Restrictions
   Order Number PB90-249640CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
   Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
   Emergency and Remedial Response; 17 Apr 89
   The directive assists the regional  removal and remedial staff
   in  making current site decisions about the  Land Disposal Re-
   strictions (LDR). The  memorandum explains:  (1) how to de-
   termine when LDRs are 'applicable' to a Superfund removal
   or remedial action, and (2) the Superfund  approach for com-
   plying with the LDRs  when they are determined to be appli-
  cable.
  Specifications: 12p.
  Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Sites, Waste
  management, Superfund, Land application, Remedial action.

0437 Policy on Floodplains and Wetland  Assessments for
  CERCLA Actions
  Order Number PB91-921329CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Emergency and  Remedial Response; 6  Aug 85
  The directive discusses specific situations requiring prepara-
  tion of a flood plains or wetlands assessment and the factors
  to be considered in preparing such an assessment.
  Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
  posit account required (minimum deposit $150 U.S., Canada,
  and Mexico; all others $300). Single copies also available  in
  paper copy or microfiche. 15p.
                                                                                                              75

-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Compliance With
Other Laws
  Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
  Hazardous materials, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
  Response.
0438  Summary of 'Notification of Out-of-State Shipments
  of Superfund Site Wastes'
  Order Number PB91-228197CDH, price: PC A01/MF Ap1
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Emergency and Remedial Response; May 91
  The Fact Sheet summarizes  EPA's policy that  prior to the
  off-site shipment of Superfund  wastes  to  an  out-of-state
  waste management facility, EPA Regional Personnel will pro-
  vide notice to the receiving state's environmental officials.
  Specifications: 3p.
  Subject index keywords: Superfund,  Waste management,
  Hazardous materials, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
  Response.
0439  Superfund Guide to RCRA Management
  Requirements for Mineral Processing Wastes
  Order Number PB91-921318CDH, price: PC A01/MF A01
  Environmental  Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Emergency and Remedial Response; Jan 91
  The report summarizes recent revisions to  the 1980 mining
  waste exclusion, explains the potential effects of these revi-
  sions on waste management options for mineral processing
  wastes, and  provides a general framework for managing min-
  eral processing wastes at CERCLA sites in accordance with
  RCRA land disposal restrictions (LDRs) and the recently pro-
  mulgated toxicity characteristics (TC) rule.
  Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing  Order, de-
  posit account required  (minimum deposit $150 U.S., Canada,
  and Mexico; all others $300). Single copies also available in
  paper copy or microfiche. 5p.
  Subject index keywords: Mining, Solid waste disposal, Re-
  visions, Hazardous materials, Superfund, Mineral processing
  wastes.
 0440  Superfund LDR Guide No. 1: Overview of RCRA
  Land Disposal Restrictions (LDRs)
  Order Number PB90-274325CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Emergency and Remedial Response; Jul 89
  The fact  sheet summarizes  the major  components  of the
  LDR, outlines the types of restrictions imposed, and presents
  the compliance options specified in the regulation.
  Specifications: 7p.
  Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Guidelines,
  Superfund, Waste  management, Office of  Solid Waste and
   Emergency Response, Land disposal, Remedial action.
 0441  Superfund LDR Guide No. 2: Complying with the
   California List Restrictions under Land Disposal
   Restrictions (LDRs)
   Order Number PB90-274333CDH, price: PC A01/MF A01
   Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
   Emergency and Remedial Response; Jul 89
   The fact sheet defines the California list of wastes, summa-
   rizes their respective restrictions, and discusses their  poten-
   tial to overlap with other LDR treatment standards.
   Specifications: 5p.
   Subject Index keywords: Hazardous materials,  Guidelines,
   Superfund, Waste management, Office  of Solid Waste and
   Emergency  Response, Land disposal, Remedial action.
0442  Superfund LDR Guide No. 3: Treatment Standards
  and Minimum Technology Requirements under Land
  Disposal Restrictions (LDRS)
  Order Number PB90-274341CDH,  price: PC A02/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency,  Washington, DC. Office of
  Emergency and Remedial Response; Jul 89
  The fact sheet summarizes  the types and effective dates of
  treatment standards, and outlines  procedures for compliance
  with  the treatment  standards and minimum technology re-
  quirements set during national capacity extensions.
  Specifications:  7p.
  Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Guidelines,
  Waste  treatment,  Superfund,  Office  of  Solid  Waste and
  Emergency Response, Land disposal, Waste management.

0443   Superfund  LDR Guide No. 4: Complying with the
  Hammer Restrictions under Land Disposal Restrictions
  (LDRs)
  Order Number PB90-274358CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
  Environmental Protection,Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Emergency and Remedial Response; Jul 89
  The fact sheet discusses compliance with Land Disposal Re-
  striction soft  hammer and hard hammer provisions, which are
  restrictions on the disposal of hazardous wastes if EPA does
  not promulgate standards by relevant statutory deadlines.
  Specifications:  7p.
  Subject index keywords:  Hazardous  materials, Guidelines,
  Superfund, Waste management,  Office of Solid Waste  and
  Emergency Response, Remedial action, Land disposal.

0444  Superfund LDR Guide No. 5: Determining When
  Land Disposal Restrictions (LDRs) Are 'Applicable' to
  CERCLA Response Actions
  Order Number PB90-274366CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Emergency and  Remedial Response; Jul 89
  The fact sheet outlines the  process used to  determine
  whether  the Resource  Conservation  and Recovery  Act
  (RCRA) LDRs established  under the Hazardous Waste and
  Solid Waste Amendments  are 'applicable'  to  CERCLA re-
  sponse actions.
  Specifications: 7p.
  Subject index keywords:  Hazardous materials, Guidelines,
  Superfund,  Waste  management,  Office of  Solid Waste and
  Emergency Response, Remedial  response, Land disposal.

 0445  Superfund LDR Guide No.  6A (2nd Edition)
  Obtaining a Soil and Debris Treatability Variance for
   Remedial Actions
   Order Number PB91-921327CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
   Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
   Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 90
   The fact sheet  outlines the process for  obtaining and com-
   plying with a Treatability Variance for soil and debris that are
   contaminated with RCRA hazardous wastes until such time
   that the Agency  promulgates treatment  standards for soil
   and debris.  In the  interim before the Agency promulgates a
   third set  of treatment  standards  specifically  for soil and
   debris wastes,  there is the presumption that  CERCLA re-
   sponse actions involving the  placement of soil and debris
   contaminated with RCRA  restricted  wastes   will  utilize a
   Treatability  Variance to comply with  the  LDRs.  Treatment
 76

-------
                                                                     PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Community
                                                                           Relations, State & Local, Tag Grants
   levels outlined in  the  fact sheet will  serve as  alternative
   'treatment standards'.
   Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order  de-
   posit account required (minimum deposit $150 U.S., Canada,
   and Mexico; all others $300). Single copies also available in
   paper copy or microfiche. 7p.
   Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management
   Remedial action, Waste treatment, Soil treatment, Hazardous
   materials, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response
   Treatability variance.

 0446  Superfund LDR Guide No. 7. Determining When
   Land Disposal Restrictions (LDRs) Are Relevant and
   Appropriate to CERCLA Response Actions
   Order Number PB91-214122CDH, price: PC A01/MF A01
   Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
   Emergency and Remedial Response; Dec 89
   The Fact Sheet outlines the  process used to determine
   whether  the  Resource  Conservation  and  Recovery  Act
   (RCRA) land  disposal restrictions (LDRs) established under
   the Hazardous and Solid  Waste Amendments (HSWA) are
   'relevant and appropriate' to an on-site CERCLA response
   action.
   Specifications: See also PB91-921327. 4p.
   Subject index keywords:  Superfund, Waste management
   Hazardous materials, Office of Solid Waste and Emerqencv
   Response.


 PROGRAM  IMPLEMENTATION:

 Community  Relations,  State & Local,
 Tag  Grants

 0447 Analysis of State Superfund Programs: 50-State
  Study
  Order Number PB90-272733CDH, price: PC A10/MF A02
  Environmental Law Inst, Washington, DC.; Environmental
  Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of Emergency
  and Remedial  Response; Sep 89
  The report examines site cleanup capabilities in all 50 States
  and provides descriptions of statutes, program organization,
  findings, and cleanup  procedures. Also  provides  snapshots
  of state cleanup programs.
  Specifications:   Sponsored  by Environmental  Protection
  Agency, Washington, DC. Office of Emergency and Remedial
  Response. 225p.
  Subject index keywords: States(United States), Hazardous
  materials, Waste disposal, Superfund.

0448  Analysis of State Superfund Programs: 50-State
  Study, 1990 Update
  Order Number PB91-921259CDH, price: PC A11/MF A02
  Environmental  Law Inst, Washington, DC.; Environmental
  Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of Emergency
  and Remedial Response; Sep 90
  Updates a study initially conducted in  1989 by the Environ-
  mental Law Institute for OERR. The study examines site
  cleanup capabilities  in all 50 States and provides descrip-
  tions of statutes, program organization, funding and cleanup
  procedures. This revised version also contains an analysis of
  political subdivision involvement in the cleanup process. The
  report provides detailed information for each State in a 'State
   Summaries'  chapter and  in 50-State  tables that facilitate
   comparisons between States.
   Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
   posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
   and Mexico;  all others $400). Single copies also available in
   paper copy or microfiche. See also PB90-272733. Sponsored
   by Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office
   of Emergency and Remedial Response. 226p.
   Subject index keywords: Superfund,  State programs,  Re-
   medial action, Hazardous materials, Waste management,  Re-
   medial response, US EPA Regions 1-10.

 0449  Analysis of State Superfund Programs: 50-State
   Study. 1991  Update
   Order Number PB92-963418CDH, price: PC A12/MF A03
   Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
   Emergency and Remedial Response; Dec 91
   Under the  Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization  Act
   (SARA)  of 1986, Congress requires the EPA to  involve
   States in the  Superfund program in a 'substantial and mean-
   ingful' way. The State and Local Coordination Branch (SLCB)
   is responsible  for  developing  regulations,  guidance,  and
   policy related to this Congressional mandate. As part of its
   responsibilities, the SLCB tries to maintain comprehensive in-
   formation about State capabilities to contribute to or manage
   cleanups at  hazardous waste  sites. Under a cooperative
   agreement  with EPA, the Environmental  Law Institute  has
   collected, organized, and summarized the information pre-
   sented here on State cleanup programs.
   Specifications: Paper Copy available on Standing Order, de-
   posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
   and Mexico; all  others $400). Single copies also available in
   paper copy or microfiche. See also PB91-921259 and  PB90-
   272733. 267p.
   Subject  index  keywords:  Superfund,  State  programs,
   Waste management,  Hazardous materials.

0450 Authority to Use CERCLA to Provide Enforcement
   Funding  Assistance to States
   Order Number PB91-138909CDH, price: PC A01/MF A01
   Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
   Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 12 Feb 86
   The directive transmits February 13, 1986, Office  of General
   Counsel  opinion  to EPA  Regional  offices,   authorizing
   CERCLA  funding of State negotiation and litigation activities
   at  NPL sites. See also directive no. 9831.3 'EPA State Rela-
  tionship.'
  Specifications:  See also PB91-138891 and  PB91-138917
  5p.
  Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
  Hazardous materials, Office  of Solid Waste and Emergency
  Response.

0451  CERCLA Community Relations Mailing Lists
  Order Number PB91-139527CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Solid Waste and  Emergency  Response; 6 Feb 89
  The directive emphasizes the importance of using community
  relations mailing  lists  to ensure the notification of potentially
  responsible parties.
  Specifications: 6p.
                                                                                                            77

-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Community Relations,
State & Local, Tag Grants
  Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
  Hazardous materials, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
  Response.
0452  Citizen's Guide to Air Sparging
  Order Number PB92-235597CDH, price: PC A01/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Mar 92
  The Fact Sheet contains a description of air sparging; how it
  works; why use this treatment method; will  it always work;
  where air sparging is being used; and how to get more infor-
  mation on this treatment.
  Specifications: 5p.
  Subject index keywords: Superfund,  Hazardous  materials,
  Waste management, Innovative treatment technologies, Air
  sparging, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response.

0453  Citizen's Guide to Bioventing
  Order Number PB92-235571CDH, price: PC A01/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Mar 92
  The Fact Sheet contains a description of bioventing; what it
  is; how it works; why this type  of treatment should be used;
  will bioventing work on the site; where it is being  selected;
  and how to get more information on the subject.
  Specifications: 5p.
  Subject index keywords: Superfund, Hazardous materials,
  Waste management, Innovative treatment technologies, Soil
  venting, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response.
 0454  Citizen's Guide to Glycolate Dehalogenation
  Order Number PB92-233105CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Mar 92
  Glycolate dehalogenation is the process of using a chemical
  reagent (a glycol in this case)  to remove halogen from con-
  taminants, consequently rendering them less hazardous. A
   chemical  reagent  is  a  substance used  to react with and
   change another substance. This dehalogenation process can
   be used on halogenated contaminants such as  PCBs and
   dioxins that may be found in soil and oils.
   Specifications:  6p.
   Subject index keywords: Glycols, Dehalogenation, Hazard-
   ous materials.
 0455  Citizen's Guide to How Innovative Treatment
   Technologies Are Being Successfully Applied at
   Superfund Sites
   Order Number PB92-233071CDH, price: PC A01/MF A01
   Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
   Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Mar 92
   Treatment technologies are processes applied to the  treat-
   ment of hazardous waste or contaminated materias, such as
   soils, sludges, sediments and debris, to  permanently alter
   their  condition  through  chemical,   biological,  or physical
   means. They are used as an alternative to merely containing
   the hazardous substances on site or in a hazardous waste
   landfill that is designed and operated under the Federal Re-
   source  Conservation  Recovery  Act (RCRA)  regulations.
   Today, treatment technologies are being tailored to deal with
   specific hazardous wastes.
   Specifications: 5p.
   Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste treat-
   ment.
0456  Citizen's Guide to In situ Soil Flushing
  Order Number PB92-233113CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Mar 92
  The Fact Sheet contains  a description of what in situ soil
  flushing is; how it works;  why consider in situ soil flushing;
  will soil flushing work at the site; where is it being  selected;
  and how to obtain more information.
  Specifications: 6p.
  Subject index keywords: Superfund, Hazardous materials,
  Waste  management,  Innovative  treatment  technologies,
  Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response, Soil flush-
  ing.
0457  Citizen's Guide to Innovative Treatment
  Technologies for Contaminated Soils, Sludges,
  Sediments and Debris
  Order Number PB92-235563CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC.  Office of
  Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Mar 92
  The Fact Sheet contains-,  what innovative treatment technol-
  ogies are; why they are used; the different types; how the
  treatment technologies are selected  and which are used;
  what happens of a technology does not work; where  innova-
  tive treatment technologies are being selected;  why EPA is
  encouraging the use of these treatments; and how more in-
  formation can be obtained.
  Specifications: 6p.
  Subject index keywords: Superfund,  Waste management,
  Hazardous  materials,  Innovative  treatment technologies,
  Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response.

 0458  Citizen's Guide to Soil Washing
  Order Number PB92-233097CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
  Environmental Protection  Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Mar 92
  Soil washing is a technology that  uses liquids (sometimes
  combined with chemical additives) and a mechanical  process
  to scrub soils. The scrubbing removes hazardous contami-
   nants and concentrates  them into smaller volume. After the
   soil  washing process is  completed, the smaller volume of
   soil, which contains the majority  of the fine silt and clay parti-
   cles, can be further treated by other methods (such as incin-
   eration or bioremediation) or disposed of according  to State
   and Federal regulations.
   Specifications: 6p.
   Subject index keywords: Washing, Soil, Hazardous materi-
   als.
 0459   Citizen's Guide to Solvent Extraction
   Order Number PB92-233089CDH, price: PC A01 /MF A01
   Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
   Solid Waste and Emergency Response;  Mar 92
   Solvent extraction is a treatment technology that uses a sol-
   vent (a fluid that can dissolve  another substance)  to sepa-
   rate   or  remove   hazardous  organic  contaminants  from
   sludges, sediments, or soil. Solvent extraction  does not de-
   stroy contaminants. It concentrates them so they  can be re-
   cycled or destroyed. II:  is used in combination  with other
   technologies to destroy  the separated concentrated  contami-
   nants. When the soil enters an extractor (a tank where the
   contaminated soil is mixed with  the solvent), the soil is sepa-
   rated into three components, or fractions: solvent  with dis-
  78

-------
                                                                       PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Community
                                                                              Relations, State & Local, Tag Grants
   solved contaminants,  solids, and  water. Contaminants are
   concentrated into  each of these  fractions.  For example,
   PCBs (polychlorinated  biphenyls) concentrate in the contami-
   nated solvent  mixture, while metals are left  behind in the
   solids and water.
   Specifications: 5p.
   Subject index keywords: Extraction,  Solvents,  Hazardous
   materials, Waste treatment.

 0460  Citizen's Guide to Thermal Desorption
   Order Number PB92-232396CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
   Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
   Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Mar 92
   Thermal desorption is  an  innovative  treatment technology
   that treats soils  contaminated with hazardous wastes  by
   heating the soil at realtively low temperatures (200-1000 deg
   F) so  that contaminants with low boiling points will vaporize
   (turn into  gas) and, consequently,  separate from the soil.
   There are  three steps  in thermal desorption: (1) heating the
   soil  to vaporize the contaminants; (2) treating  the vaporized
   contaminants; and (3) testing the treated soil.
   Specifications: 6p.
   Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Soils, Waste
   treatment.

 0461  Citizen's Guide to Using Indigenous and Exogenous
   Microorganisms in  Bioremediation
   Order Number PB92-235589CDH, price: PC A01/MF A01
   Environmental Protection Agency, Washington,  DC. Office of
   Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Mar 92
   The  Fact Sheet  contains a description of bioremediation;
   what indigenous and  exogenous microorganisms are; how
   these  microorganisms  are used; what sites can use these
   microorganisms; and how to obtain more information.
   Specifications: 5p.
   Subject index  keywords: Superfund,  Hazardous materials,
   Waste  management,   Innovative  treatment   technologies,
   Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response, Indigenous
   microorganisms.
0462  Citizens' Guidance Manual for the Technical
   Assistance Grant Program
   Order Number PB91-238733CDH, price: PC A14/MF A03
   Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
   Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Jun 88
   The  manual is designed to help citizens' groups apply for
   and manage a technical assistance grant. It is written as a
   self-help  guide  in an easy-to-understand  manner.  Step-by-
   step  instructions for completing various forms are included
  throughout  the manual. In addition, copies of blank forms
  have been included for easy reference.
  Specifications:  325p.
  Subject index keywords: Superfund, Hazardous materials,
  Waste  management, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
  Response, Technical Assistance Grant Program.
0463  Citizens' Guidance Manual for the Technical
  Assistance Grant Program
  Order Number PB92-101435CDH, price: PC A14/MF A03
  ICF Technology, Inc., Fairfax, VA:; Environmental Protection
  Agency, Washington, DC. Office of Emergency and Remedial
  Response; Jun 88
  The  Superfund  Amendments  and  Reauthorization Act of
  1986 (SARA), which  amended CERCLA, provides under sec-
   tion 117(e) an important new component of EPA's communi-
   ty relations activities at Superfund sites-technical assistance
   grants to affected groups. The purpose of these grants is to
   assist citizens' groups in understanding technical information
   that assesses potential hazards and the selection and design
   of  appropriate  response actions at  Superfund sites.  This
   manual outlines Federal policies, procedures, and regulations
   related to the Technical Assistance Grant Program and pro-
   vides instructions on how to complete Federal grant forms. If
   a State administers the Technical Assistance Grant Program,
   the State may have additional procedures and requirements
   that affect citizens' groups applying  for grants within that
   State. Groups,  therefore,  should contact the appropriate
   State representative for specific information. This  manual is
   designed to help citizens'  groups apply  for and manage a
   technical assistance grant. It is written as a self-help guide in
   an  easy-to-understand manner. Step-by-step instructions for
   completing   various forms  are  included  throughout the
   manual.
   Specifications:   Sponsored  by Environmental Protection
  Agency, Washington, DC. Office of Emergency and Remedial
   Response. 320p.
  Subject index keywords: Citizen participation, Technical as-
  sistance, Manuals, Superfund,  Hazardous materials,  Waste
  management, Technical Assistance Grant Program.

0464   Communicating with the Public About Hazardous
  Materials: An Examination of Local Practice. Risk
  Communication Series
  Order Number PB90-235938CDH, price: PC A06/MF A01
  Virginia Polytechnic Inst. and State Univ.,  Blacksburg. Center
  for Environmental and Hazardous Material Studies.;
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC,  Office of
  Policy, Planning and Evaluation; Apr 90
  The study's purpose is to improve the ability of public and
  private sector organizations  to communicate with  members
  of the general public about the risks posed by hazardous ma-
  terials, such as those found  in Superfund or RCRA sites, or
  subject to SARA  Title III. The second  phase included a na-
  tional  survey of  Local  Emergency  Planning  Committees
  (LEPCs) and case studies of selected risk communication ef-
  forts. The survey, conducted in a sample  of ten  states, was
  designed to assess the risk communication efforts of LEPCs
  and to gauge their capacity for promoting  risk communication
  in their communities. Case studies in three communities pro-
  vide examples of  risk communication efforts, with secondary
  case studies in neighboring areas. The purpose was to (earn
  what risk communication techniques had  been tried in these
  cases, to secure suggestions  for risk communication pro-
  grams from  practitioners, and to assess the level of hazard-
  ous  materials  awareness among a sample of the  attentive
  public in each community.
  Specifications: See also PB90-231200. Sponsored by Envi-
  ronmental Protection Agency,  Washington,  DC. Office of
  Policy, Planning and Evaluation. 118p.
  Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Risk, Emer-
  gencies, Environmental exposure, Public education.
                                                                                                                79

-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Community Relations,
State & Local, Tag Grants
0465  Community Relations during Enforcement Activities
  and Development of the Administrative Record
  Order Number PB91-139519CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Emergency and Remedial Response; 3 Nov 88
  The report discusses enforcement community relations. The
  directive, which is Chapter VI of 'Community  Relations in Su-
  perfund: A Handbook,' discusses developing  community rela-
  tions  plans, the  relationship between  the administrative
  record for response selection and community relations, and
  community relations during specific enforcement actions and
  settlements.
  Specifications:  Final version of Chapter 6 for Community
  Relations in Superfund: A Handbook. 31 p.
  Subject  Index keywords: Community relations, Hazardous
  materials, Superfund program.
 0466  Community Relations during Enforcement Activities
  and Development of the Administrative  Record
  Order Number PB92-105469CDH,  price: PC A03/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency,  Washington, DC. Office of
  Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 3 Nov 88
  The directive  discusses enforcement community relations.
  The directive, which is Chapter VI  of 'Community Relations in
  Superfund: A  Handbook,'  discusses developing community
  relations plans, the relationship between the administrative
  record for response selection and community relations, and
  community relations during specific enforcement actions and
  settlements. The  document supersedes directive number
  9836.0 'Interim Guidance on Community Relations in  En-
  forcement,'  dated March  22, 1985,  and directive number
  9836.0-1 a 'Community Relations  Activities at Superfund En-
  forcement Sites,' dated August 8,  1985.
  Specifications: 28p.
  Subject Index keywords: Waste management, Superfund,
   Hazardous materials, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
   Response.
 0467   Community Relations In Superfund: A Handbook
   Order Number PB92-963341CDH, price: PC  A12/MF A03
   Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
   Emergency and Remedial Response; Jan  92
   The  Superfund community relations program promotes two-
   way  communication between members of the public,  includ-
   ing potentially responsible parties (PRPs), and the lead gov-
   ernment agency in charge of response actions. The commu-
   nity relations  activities discussed in this Handbook provide
   the opportunity for interested persons to comment on, and
   provide input to, decisions about  response  actions.  This
   Handbook offers policy and guidance on planning and con-
   ducting Superfund community relations programs. It empha-
   sizes proven approaches and activities derived from years of
   experience in conducting  community relations in Superfund.
   Specifications: Paper copy available on  Standing Order, de-
   posit account required (minimum deposit  $200 U.S., Canada,
   and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
   paper copy or microfiche. Supersedes PB89-180830. 268p.
   Subject Index keywords: Superfund, Community relations,
   Waste management,  Hazardous materials, Handbooks, Re-
   medial response, Cleanup operations.
0468  Counting State-Lead Enforcement NPL Sites Toward
  the CERCLA Section 116(e) Remedial Action Start
  Mandate
  Order Number PB91-138933CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Emergency and Remedial Response; 21  Oct 88
  The directive outlines the criteria and procedures for count-
  ing  State-lead enforcement  National  Priorities List sites
  toward the CERCLA section  116(e) remedial action start
  mandate. The guidance supplements directive no. 9355.0-24
  'OSWER Strategy for Management Oversight of the CERCLA
  RA Start Mandate,' dated December 28, 1987.
  Specifications:  See also PB91-138925. 7p.
  Subject  index keywords: Superfund, Waste  management,
  Hazardous materials, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
  Response.
0469   Criminal Investigations and the Superfund Program
  Order Number PB90-274499CDH, price: PC A01/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 90
  The fact sheet,  directed toward any  one  who  witnesses
  fraudulent activity in  EPA programs, discusses areas in which
  fraud and abuse can occur and provides an understanding of
  the criminal investigation process that results from reports of
  suspicious activity.
  Specifications: 5p.
  Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Criminal  in-
  vestigations, Superfund, Waste management, Office of Solid
  Waste  and  Emergency  Response,  Pollution regulations,
  Fraud.
 0470  Debarment and Suspension
  Order Number PB92-963331CDH, price: PC A01/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office  of
  Emergency and Remedial Response; Oct 91
  The  report  defines debarment and  suspension, and  de-
  scribes causes  and procedures and authorities for pursuing
  them. Also the study includes  requirements of the Drug-Free
  Work Place Act.
  Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
   posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
  and Mexico; all others $400).  Single copies also available in
   paper copy or microfiche. Supersedes PB90-272527. 4p.
   Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Federal law,
   Funds,  Pollution control,  Superfund, Drug Free Work Place
   Act.
 0471 Enhancing State Superfund Capabilities: Nine-State
   Study
   Order Number PB91-242362CDH, price: PC A12/MF A03
   Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
   Emergency and Remedial Response.; Environmental  Law
   Inst., Washington, DC; Dec 90
   Nine (9) state hazardous substance cleanup programs were
   studied in depth in 1989 to determine what elements of fund-
   ing, enforcement, program organization and other factors  are
   important to state capabilities. Those studied were Colorado,
   Illinois, Minnesota, New Hampshire, New Jersey, North Caro-
   lina, Oregon, Pennsylvania, and Texas. The states were  se-
   lected  to provide  a cross-section of  large and small  pro-
   grams,  new  and older programs, geographic diversity,  and
   special program features. The findings of the study, prepared
  80

-------
          Envi™me,ntal Law Institute for the Office of Policy

   Part On9ea,nv tHValUati°nh(OPPE)' are reP°rted in **> P^s
   Part One synthesizes the results across states and draws
   conclusions concerning means of enhancing programs Part

   ±r*ePTSt°n 6aCh °f the States studiedlnd shows how
   program features combine in the context of operating pro-


   ffwTnS3 w"SK P^Paod in cooPeration with Environmental
   Law Inst, Washington, DC. 259p.

   Subject index  keywords: Superfund, Hazardous materials
   Waste management, State programs, Cleanup operations

 ^SuDerfTd1'^ !herAdeqUaCy °f Cost Share Provisions in
   auperfund State Contracts
   Order Number PB93-963336CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
   SMH w"1?*31 Pr°tection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
   Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 29 Mar 93

   ™Lmemora"durn  revests regional offices to  re-examine
   t±r9, Supterfund State Contracts (SSCs) for Fund-financed
   remedial actions to verify  that they adequately reflect in
   curred and projected remedial action costs
   Specifications:  Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
   posit account required (minimum deposit $200 US., Canada

  Daoe^on°: a" 0tnTl$400)-  Sin9|e c°Pies a'so available in'
  paper copy or microfiche. 1 1p.

  Subject index keywords: Superfund, Hazardous materials
  Waste disposal, Contract management.

0473   Final Guidance on Administrative Records for
  Selecting CERCLA  Response Actions
  Order Number PB91-139121CDH, price: PC A06/MF A01
  I^un,metntal Pr°tection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Solid Waste and  Emergency Response; 3 Dec 90
  The directive sets forth the policy and procedures governinq
  he compilation and establishment  of administrativf reco ds
  for selecting (response actions under CERCLA, as amended
  by  SARA. The directive supersedes no. 9833 3A  'Interim
  ?PRnCAep°n  Administr3«ve  Records   for  Selection Tf
  CERCLA Response Actions' dated May 29, 1987.

                         f tWS d°CUmen* are not fullv
 Resonse
                         Superfund, Waste management,
                    Office of Solid Waste and Emergency


     Funding of State Enforcement Related Activities
 Order Number PB91-138891CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
 Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
     Waste and Emergency Response; 23 Jan 85

 QHnrvJ8^-*^110"11098 that funding can be  Provided to
 support a limited number of  enforcement  related activities
 based on the July 20, 1985, Office of General Counsel opin-
 SE'to c «    directive no- 9831.3a, 'CERCLA  Funding of
 rSS, EnforHcetmf "*  Activities  at NPL Sites - Interim  Draft
 Guidance,' dated October 1, 1986.
Specifications:  See also PB91 -138909 7p

H±riCL'nS±r°Dr±LlTen:und' W?ste management,
              PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Community
                     Relations, State & Local, Tag Grants


   0475  Guidance on Site Assessment Cooperative
     Agreements
     Order Number PB92-224385CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
     Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
     Emergency and Remedial Response; Aug 91
     The guidance on site assessment cooperative agreement
     presents generic  SMOA language pertaining to Site  Assess-
     ment activities, a  generic quarterly report format, and generic
     site assessment cooperative agreement application package
     In addition, the appendices  provide  additional sample sched-
     ules, forms, and letters for developing a site assessment co-
    operative agreement.
    Specifications: 40p.

    tDAJe?A,indeX keywords: s'te surveys, State programs, US
    EPA, Waste management,  Superfund,  Cooperative agree-
    ments.
  0476  Guide to Community Involvement for Site
    Assessment Managers
    Order Number PB93-963348CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
    Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
    bolid Waste and Emergency Response; Sep 93
    The report includes information  on community involvement
    initiatives that can be taken during the technical phases of
    site assessment and instructions on how  to take these ac-
    tions for hazardous wastes.
    Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order de-
    posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S.  Canada
    and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
    paper copy or microfiche. 8p.
    Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Community
    relations, Sites, Pollution control.

 0477  Interim Final Guidance Package on Funding
   CERCLA State Enforcement Actions at NPL Sites
   Order Number PB91-138917CDH,  price: PC A03/MF A01
   or!!0.",1716"'3' Protection Agency,  Washington, DC. Office of
   bolid Waste and Emergency Response; 7 Apr 88
   The directive  outlines requirements, conditions,  and limita-
   tions for State funding under a  CERCLA cooperative agree-
   ment of CERCLA enforcement  actions at National Priorities
   o!foHSL        guidance is divided into four subcomponents-
   a«t f f' .^'o3^ d' Tne directive supersedes directive no.
   9831.1-1a CERCLA Funding of State Oversight of Potentially
   Responsible Parties (PRPs),' dated October 1, 1986, and di-
   ToT; "?-• 9831'3 dated Oct°ber 1,  1986 'CERCLA Funding
   of State Enforcement Activities at  NPL Sites,' - Interim Draft
   Guidance.

   Specifications:  See also PB91-138909 and PB91 -138925.

  Subject index keywords: Superfund,  Waste management
  Hazardous materials, Office of Solid  Waste and Emergency
  Response.                                          J

0478  Obligation of Funds under Superfund State
  Contracts
  Order Number PB93-963326CDH, price: PC A01/MF A01
  I"r^0,",™6"*3' Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  bolid Waste  and Emergency Response; 5 Aug 93
  The memorandum clarifies EPA's  interpretation of 40 CFR
  Hart 35, Subpart O, regarding  the relationship between cost
  share assurances in Superfund State Contracts (SSCs) and
  the obligation of remedial action  funds. EPA's policy is that
                                                                                                           81

-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Community Relations,
State & Local, Tag Grants
  remedial design monies may be obligated to another Federal
  agency to initiate the procurement process for a remedial
  action contract before  an  SSC is executed. However, the
  memorandum  also reiterates  Agency policy that an  SSC
  must be in place before funds may be obligated for initiating
  or continuing remedial action.
  Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
  posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
  and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
  paper copy or microfiche. 4p.
  Subject index keywords: Superfund, Contract management,
  State government.
 0479  Political Subdivision Involvement in Superfund
  Order Number PB90-273954CDH, price: PC A01/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Emergency and Remedial Response; Apr 90
  The fact sheet provides guidance to Regions, States and po-
  litical subdivisions  on the  designation of a political subdivi-
  sion  as the  lead agency  for  remedial  response   under
  CERCLA.
  Specifications:  4p.
  Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Superfund,
  Office of Solid Waste and Emergency  Response,  Waste
   management, Remedial response.
 0480 Political Subdivision Involvement in Superfund
   Order Number PB92-963330CDH, price: PC A01/MF A01
   Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
   Emergency and Remedial Response; Oct 91
   The Comprehensive  Environmental Response,  Compensa-
   tion, and Liability Act (CERCLA), as amended, allows EPA to
   provide  funds to  States,  political subdivisions thereof, and
   federally recognized Indian Tribes for Superfund response.
   The definition of  political subdivision varies from State to
   State, since each  State determines what units of government
   meet its legislative definition. A political subdivision can par-
   ticipate  in Superfund cleanup as a lead  or  support agency
   when EPA and the State agree that this enhances the clean-
   up process and results in an efficient, economical, and well-
   coordinated  use of  resources. To determine this, EPA and
   the State assess  the political  subdivision's prior involvement
   and agree that: The political  subdivision  is able to conduct
   the response activities; It is economical and advantageous to
   designate the political subdivision as lead;  and  The political
   subdivision has the authority to enter  into a  Cooperative
   Agreement with the Federal Government and to administer
    Federal dollars.
    Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
    posit account required (minimum deposit  $200 U.S., Canada,
    and Mexico;  all others $400). Single copies also available in
    paper copy or microfiche. Supersedes PB90-273954. 3p.
    Subject Index keywords: Funds, Hazardous materials, Pol-
    lution control, Law(Jurisprudence), Superfund, Cleanup, Com-
    prehensive Environmental Response Compensation  and Li-
    ability Act.
  0481  Public Awareness Signs at Superfund Sites
    Order Number PB91-921306CDH, price:  PC A01/MF A01
    Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
    Emergency and Remedial Response; Oct 90
    The Fact Sheet is designed to inform individuals involved in
    the Superfund program about the need to post signs at every
    Superfund site. Superfund sites have been and will continue
 to be of interest and concern to people in surrounding com-
 munities and to the public in general. Through the posting of
 signs at each site,,the Superfund program can work to pro-
 mote continued interaction with communities  as  well  as
 assure that interested  parties .can  access information  or
 report unusual or criminal activities.
 Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
 posit account required (minimum deposit $150 U.S., Canada,
 and Mexico; all others $300). Single  copies also available in
 paper copy or microfiche. 2p.
 Subject  index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
 Hazardous materials, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
 Response, Signs.

0482  Questions and Answers About the State Role in
 Remedy Selection at Non-Fund-Financed Enforcement
 Sites
  Order Number PB91-187039CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 18 Apr 91
  The directive describes circumstances  under  which States
  may select and implement a  remedy at NPL sites without
  first obtaining EPA concurrence.
  Specifications: 7p.
  Subject index keywords: Waste management, Superfund,
  Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response.

 0483  Reporting and Exchange of Information on State
  Enforcement Actions at National Priorities List Sites
  Order Number PB91-138883CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 14 Mar 86
  The directive outlines  need for EPA Headquarters reporting
  and exchange of information on State-lead enforcement sites
  in order to facilitate Federal oversight and review of State ac-
  tions The memorandum has two attachments: (1) results of
  a survey.on current State-lead enforcement data on  EPA
  systems, and (2) a list of additional data requirements that
  should be addressed.
   Specifications: See also PB91 -138891. 18p.
   Subject index keywords:  Superfund, Waste  management,
   Hazardous materials, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
   Response.

 0484 Revised Interim Final Guidance on Indian
   Involvement in the Superfund Program
   Order Number PB90-249723CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
   Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
   Emergency and Remedial Response; 28 Nov 89
   The directive supplements and references existing documen-
   tation for EPA Regional personnel and highlights issues spe-
   cific to the involvement of federally recognized Indian tribes
   in the Superfund program.
   Specifications: 17p.
   Subject index keywords: Regulations, Superfund, Remedial
   action, Office of  Solid Waste and  Emergency  Response,
   American Indians.
   82

-------
         r°'e °f 9ommunity Interviews in the Development
               ""   Relations Pr°9ram for Remedial
of
     Order Number PB90-273756CDH, price: PC A01/MF
     Env,ronmental Protection Agency,' Washington
     Emergency and Remedial Response; 1 5 Jun 90
     The directive offers guidance in response to recent Reaional
     SSedTv ZVT^ the c^^nity relations inteEj
     required by the National Contingency Plan
     Specifications: 5p
  °4
                   Desk Refere"ce for Municipalities
                                                       *
    The manual is a compilation of existing documents relatina
    to municipalities  and Superfund. The manual's pumose is to
    assist municipalities who have been or might be  EtifTed as
    SSSS& resp°nsit?le P,arties  
-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Community Relations,
State & Local, Tag Grants
  Subject index keywords: Waste disposal, Hazardous mate-
  rials, Site selection, Site surveys, Superfund.

0492  Superfund Fact Sheet: PCBs
  Order Number PB93-963309CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Sep 92
  The fact sheet describes polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs),
  where PCBs can be found and how they can enter the body
  and affect human health. The fact sheet is one in a series
  providing  reference  information about Superfund issues and
  is intended for readers with  no formal scientific training.
  Specifications: Paper copy available on  Standing Order, de-
  posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
  and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies  also available  in
  paper copy or microfiche. 6p.
  Subject Index keywords:  Environmental exposure, Hazard-
  ous materials, Polychlorinated biphenyls,  Superfund.

 0493  Superfund Fact Sheet: Public Involvement
   Order Number PB93-963313CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
   Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
   Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Sep 92
   The fact sheet describes how citizens can participate in the
   decision-making process  regarding Superfund  activities  in
   their communities.  Explanations of how citizens can report
   potential Superfund sites, address public health hazards from
   both the site itself and cleanup activities, and provide input
   to limit the effects of the cleanup on their communities are
   given. The fact sheet is one in  a series providing reference
   information about Superfund  issues and is intended for read-
   ers with no formal scientific training.
   Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
   posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
   and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
   paper copy or microfiche. 6p.
   Subject index keywords: Waste disposal,  Hazardous mate-
   rials, Citizen participation, Superfund.
  0494  Superfund Fact Sheet: The Remedial Program
   Order Number PB93-963315CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
    Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office  of
    Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Sep 92
    The fact sheet describes  what various  actions the EPA can
    take to clean  up  hazardous wastes sites. Explanations of
    how the criteria for environmental and  public health risk  as-
    sessment are determined and the role of state and local gov-
    ernments in site remediation are given.  The fact sheet is one
    in a series providing reference information about Superfund
    issues  and is intended for readers with no formal scientific
    training.
    Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order,  de-
    posit account required (minimum deposit $200  U.S., Canada,
    and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
    paper copy or microfiche. 6p.
    Subject index keywords: Waste disposal, Hazardous mate-
    rials, Superfund.
  0495  Superfund Fact Sheet: The Removal Program
     Order Number PB93-963310CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
     Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
     Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Sep 92
     The fact sheet describes the Superfund Emergency  Re-
     sponse Program,  a program specifically designed to respond
 to multi-media hazardous materials accidents (e.g. illegal dis-
 posal or improper handling of materials, transportation acci-
 dents, chemical fires) that endanger people and/or the envi-
 ronment. Explanations  of how the removal program works
 and how the affected  communities are involved  are given.
 The fact sheet is one in a series providing reference informa-
 tion about Superfund issues and is intended for readers with
 no scientific training.
 Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order  de-
 posit account required  (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada
 and Mexico; all others  $400). Single copies also available in
 paper copy  or microfiche. 6p.
 Subject index keywords: Waste disposal, Hazardous mate-
  rials, Pollution control, Superfund.

0496  Superfund Fact Sheet: Trichloroethylene
  Order Number PB93-963307CDH,  price: PC A02/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency,  Washington, DC. Office of
  Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Sep 92
  The fact sheet describes trichloroethylene (TCE), a chemical
  that can be found in  a variety of products,  including some
  glues,  paints and paint  removers, and  spot removers  and
  cleaners. Explanations of how TCE can get into the body
  and how it  can affect human health are given. The fact sheet
  is one in a series providing reference information about Su-
  perfund issues and is intended for readers with no formal sci-
  entific training.
  Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order de-
  posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
  and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
  paper copy or microfiche. 6p.
  Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Environmen-
  tal exposure, Ethylene/trichloro, Superfund.

 0497  Superfund Information Repositories and
   Administrative Records: Introduction for Librarians
   Order Number PB92-963621CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
   Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
   Emergency and Remedial Response; Aug 92
   The fact sheet discusses two features of EPA's Superfund
   Community Relations Program:  the information  repository
   and the administrative record. The fact sheet describes the
   types of information usually contained in  the information  re-
   pository and administrative record and describes what is in-
   volved in acting as an information repository librarian.
   Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
   posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
   and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
   paper copy or microfiche. 8p.
   Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Information
   centers, Records management, Superfund, Repositories.

 0498  Superfund: Qualified Disadvantaged  Business
    Utilization in State Response
    Order Number PB92-963283CDH, price: PC A01 /MF A01
    Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
    Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Apr 92
    The fact sheet concentrates on  Disadvantaged  Business En-
    terprise utilization in cases where States are managing the
    cleanup of National Priority List sites. It introduces the Super-
    fund process, focuses on disadvantaged business enterprise
    participation and involvement in state Superfund programs,
   84

-------
    provides a  regulatory context for contracting practices, and
    offers additional information sources.
    Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order de-
    posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U S  Canada
    and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
    paper copy  or microfiche. 5p.

    Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste manaqement
    Hazardous materials,  Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
    Hesponse.

  0499  Superfund Technical Assistance Grant (TAG)
    Handbook
    Order Number PB91-238592CDH, price: PC A12/MF A03
    Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC Office of
    Emergency and Remedial Response; Apr 90
    The handbook is designed to guide the reader through the
    nlv nn fifth"    Atsfistance Grant (TAG) Program, from ap-
    plying for the grant to selecting a technical advisor and man-
    aging a TAG project. The handbook explains federal policies
    procedures,  and regulations related to the TAG Program and
    provides detailed instructions on  how to complete necessary
    grant forms.  The handbook is intended for those who have
    already submitted a Letter of Intent.
   Specifications: 268p.

   Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste  management
   Hazardous materials, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
   Response, Technical Assistance Grant Program.

 0500  Superfund Technical Assistance Grant (TAG)
   Handbook: Applying for Your Grant
   Order Number PB93-963352CDH, price:
   l"li"?«mental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
   bolid Waste and Emergency Response; Sep 93

   fTmriJ£ChniCllASSiStance  Grant (TAG> Pr°9ram Provi'des
   funds for qualified citizens'  groups affected by a Superfund
   site to hire independent technical advisors to help interpret
   and  comment on site-related information.  The booklet ex-
   plains the basic program requirements that your group must
   meet to be eligible for a TAG and to successfully complete a
   LnGlQa-PPllcati°n- The TAG  Program is governed by certain
   regulations, which are paraphrased throughout the booklet.
   Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order  de-
   posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S  Canada
   and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies  also available in
   paper copy or microfiche. See also PB93-963353. 24p.
  Subject index keywords: Superfund, Financial assistance,
  Information dissemination.

0501  Superfund Technical Assistance Grant (TAG)
  Handbook: The Application Forms with Instructions
  Order Number PB93-963353CDH, price:
  I^A/metntal Pr°tection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  bolid Waste and Emergency Response; Sep 93
  Contents: Sample Application Forms with Instructions; Letter
  of Intent; Standard Form 424 - General Information; Stand-
  ard Form 424A - Budget Information; Standard Form 424B -
  Assurances; Project  Narrative  Statement; Certification  Re-
  garding Debarment; Drug Free Workplace Certification; Certi-
  fication Regarding Lobbying; Attachments; Attachment 1.A. -
  Statement of Work; Attachment 1.B. - Proposed Schedule of
  Tasks  and Costs for Technical Advisors; and  Attachment
  1 .C. - Detailed Budget.
              PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Community
                    Relations, State & Local, Tag Grants


    Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
    posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada
    and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
    paper copy or microfiche. See also PB93-963352. 11 Op.
    Subject index keywords: Superfund, Financial assistance,
    Information dissemination.

  0502  Superfund Technical Assistance Grants
    Order Number PB90-273772CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
    Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
    Emergency and Remedial Response; Jan 90
    The fact sheet provides background and basic  information
    on the Technical Assistance Grant (TAG) program, which
    provides funds for qualified citizen's groups to hire independ-
    ent technical advisors to  help them understand and com-
    ment on  technical  factors in  cleanup decisions  affectina
    them at nearby sites.
    Specifications:  See also PB90-194721. 9p.
    Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials,  Superfund
    Technical  Assistance  Grant Program,  Waste management!
    Office of Solid Waste  and Emergency  Response, Remedial
    action.

 0503 Superfund Technical Assistance Grants (Fact Sheet)
   Order Number PB93-963301 CDH, price:
   Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
   Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Sep 93
   An important aspect of the Superfund program is citizen in-
   volvement at the local level in decision making  that relates to
   site-specific cleanup  actions. Recognizing the  importance of
   community involvement and the need for citizens living near
   NPL sites to be well  informed, Congress included provisions
   in SARA to  establish a Technical Assistance Grant (TAG)
   Program, intended to promote  public involvement  in deci-
   sions on site-specific cleanup strategies under  Superfund.
   The TAG  Program  provides funds  for qualified citizens'
   groups  affected by a  Superfund site to hire independent
   technical advisors to help them understand and comment on
   site-related information, and thus participate in  cleanup deci-
   sions.
   Specifications: Paper copy available on  Standing Order, de-
   posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
  and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies  also available in
  paper copy or microfiche. 6p.
  Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management
  Remedial action, Office of Solid  Waste and Emergency Re-
  sponse, Technical Assistance Grant Program.

0504  Superfund Technical Assistance Grants Program-
  Regional Guidance Manual
  Order Number PB90-194721 CDH, price: PC A05/MF A01
  IGF, Inc., Fairfax, VA.;  Environmental Protection Agency
  Washington,  DC. Office of Emergency and Remedial
  Response; Jul 88
  Section  117(e)  of the  Comprehensive  Environmental Re-
  sponse, Compensation, and  Liability Act of 1980 (CERCLA),
  as amended, states that technical assistance grants can be
  made to 'any group of individuals which may be affected by
  a release or threatened release at any facility which is listed
  on the National Priorities List (NPL)' Affected groups eligible
  for technical  assistance  grants are those that  can demon-
  strate, among other things, that their members face actual or
  potential health, economic, or environmental threats  arising
                                                                                                               85

-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Enforcement
  from a release or threatened release at a facility listed on the
  NPL or proposed for listing where a response action is un-
  derway. CERCLA, as amended, authorizes a maximum tech-
  nical assistance grant of up to $50,000 per site for the dura-
  tion of site response activities. Citizens' groups are required
  to provide matching funds. Only one grant may be awarded
  for any eligible NPL site. If more than one group intends to
  apply for the available grant at a site,  the groups should be
  encouraged to  consolidate  and  submit  one  application.
  Grants will be used for the purpose of obtaining technical as-
  sistance  to interpret information  related to Superfund re-
  sponse activities at a site.
  Specifications:  Also pub.  as OSWER DIRECTIVE-9230.1-
  04. Sponsored  by  Environmental  Protection Agency, Wash-
  ington, DC. Office of  Emergency and  Remedial Response.
  94p.
  Subject  index  keywords: Pollution control, Hazardous ma-
  terials, Grants, Superfund program.
 0505  Superfund Technical Assistance Grants (TAGs)
   (Pamphlet)
   Order Number PB93-963302CDH, price:
   Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
   Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Sep 93
   The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) believes it is im-
   portant for communities to be involved in decisions related to
   nearby Superfund  sites.  For this reason, community outreach
   activities are underway at each of the 1,200 sites on the Na-
   tional Priorities List (NPL). Congress established the Techni-
   cal Assistance Grant (TAG) Program in 1986 to help affected
   communities understand and comment on site-related infor-
   mation,  and thus participate in cleanup decisions.
   Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
   posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
   and Mexico; all others $400).  Single copies also available in
   paper copy or microfiche. 8p.
   Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
    Remedial action, Technical Assistance Grant Program.
  0506  Supporting State Attorneys General CERCLA
    Remedial and Enforcement Activities at NPL Sites
    Order Number PB91-138925CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
    Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
    Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 21 Jun 88
    The directive reaffirms role of State-lead agency for award of
    cooperative agreements, and states that funds can none-the-
    less be available to State attorneys general via pass through
    from the lead agency. Describes the three types of coopera-
    tive agreements that can be passed through the State-lead
    agency to the State Attorney General. The  guidance supple-
    ments directives  no. 9831.6a-6d  'Interim  Final  Guidance
    Package on Funding CERCLA State Enforcement Actions at
    NPL Sites,' dated April 7, 1988.
    Specifications:  See also  PB91-138933 and  PB91-138917.
    10p.
    Subject index keywords: Superfund,  Waste management,
    Hazardous materials, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
    Response.
0507  Understanding Bioremediation: A Guidebook for
  Citizens                               .„„,,.,- Arn
  Order Number PB93-205870CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Emergency and Remedial Response; Feb 91
  Bioremediation - a process  that uses  microorganisms to
  transform  harmful substances to  nontoxic  compounds -  is
  one  of the  most promising  new technologies for treating
  chemical  spills and hazardous waste problems. In order to
  improve the technology and  better  understand ite capabili-
  ties  the U S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is en-
  couraging field tests and evaluation of waste site cleanups
  using bioremediation.  As bioremediation  is considered more
  frequently as a cleanup alternative, citizens need information
  about this process to help them contribute to informed deci-
  sion-making regarding the cleanup of waste sites in  the.
  communities. The brochure answers some questions  about
  what bioremediation is, where it can be used  effectively, and
  its advantages and disadvantages.
  Specifications:  See  also PB90-216466, PB92-235589 and
  PB93-116143. 23p.
  Subject  index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste treat-
   ment, Biological treatment.
 0508   Understanding Superfund Risk Assessment
   Order Number PB92-963372CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
   Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
   Emergency and Remedial Response; Jul 92
   The fact sheet explains the Superfund risk assessment proc-
   ess in non-technical terms, defining risk  assessment and nsK
   management, and describing the four steps of  risk assess-
   ment Information is also provided on how the public can get
   more involved in Superfund risk assessment and suggestions
   for further reading.
   Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
   posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
   and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies  also available in
   paper copy or microfiche. 8p.
   Subject index  keywords: Superfund, Hazardous materials,
   Waste management,  Office of Solid Waste  and Emergency
   Response.
  PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION:

  Enforcement

  0509  Accelerating Potentially Responsible Party Remedial
    Design Starts: Implementing the 30-Day Study
    Order Number PB92-963608CDH, price: PC A011/MF•AOI
    Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
    Waste Programs Enforcement; 2 Apr 92
    The directive encourages the regions to use all available.op-
    portunities to obtain Potentially Responsible Party (PRP) start
    of the Remedial Design (RD) prior to  entry of a Consent
    Decree. At a minimum, the RD should start at lodging of the
    Consent Decree. Where appropriate, regions should have the
    RD start even  earlier, as soon after signature of the Record
    of Decision (ROD) as possible.
    Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
    posit account required  (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada
    and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
    paper copy or microfiche. See also PB91-139394. 5p.
   86

-------
                                                                     PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Enforcement
    Subject index keywords: Superfund,  Waste management
    Hazardous materials, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
    Response.                                           }

  0510  Administrative Order on Consent for Remedial
    Investigations/Feasibility Study
    Order Number PB91-139378CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
    o"™"16"*3' Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
    Solid Waste and Emergency Response;  5 Feb 90
    The directive  provides a model order that is designed to re-
    £a^,   outdated model order that was issued prior to the
    UhRCLA amendments. The model order is designed to facili-
   tate settlement negotiations by serving as an opening hand-
   position, and to facilitate national consistency. The directive
   supersedes directive no.  9835.3 'Model  Administrative Order
   ?Lcate  Party Conduct f°r RI/FSs,' dated  January 31
   1985, and supplements  directive no. 9835.8 'Model State-
   ment of  Work for  Remedial   Investigations and  Feasibility
   Study Conducted by Potentially Responsible Parties (PRPs)'
 , dated June 2,  1989.                                  ''
   Specifications: 34p.
 ' Subject  index keywords:  Remedial  action,  Superfund
   Waste  management,  Hazardous materials, Office  of Solid
   Waste and Emergency Response.

 0511  Administrative Penalty Procedures
   Order Number PB92-101963CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
   Environmental  Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
   bolid Waste and Emergency Response; 1991
   The directive  discusses administrative penalty  procedures
   r£>nf  Provides that the  administrative assessment  of
   OERCLA Section 109  penalties  and EPCRA  Section 325
   penalties will be governed by  EPA's Consolidated Rules of
   Practice  Governing the Administrative Assessment of Civil
   Penalties and  by supplemental rules relating specifically  to
   penalty  assessments under Section 109 of CERCLA and
  Section 325 of  EPCRA.
  Specifications: 8p.
  Subject index  keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste man-
  agement, Superfund, Office of  Solid Waste  and  Emergency
  Response.                                           *

0512  Arbitration Procedures for Small Superfund Cost
  Recovery Claims
  Order Number PB92-102045CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Emergency and Remedial Response;  22 May 89

  T5prhScti^Jo^!eAments  EPA'S authorityunder Section
  i^(h)(2) of CERCLA, which authorizes the  head of any de-
  partment or agency with authority to undertake a response
  action under CERCLA to use arbitration as a method of set-
  tling CERCLA Section 107(a) claims for recovery of response
  costs  incurred  by the  U.S. pursuant to Section 104 of
  OtHULA.
  Specifications:   18p.
  Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Superfund
 Waste management, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
 Response.                                       a   y
  0513   BEN: A Model to Calculate the Economic Benefit of
    Noncompliance. User's Manual
    Order Number PB92-230358CDH, price: PC A08/MF A02
    Industrial Economics, Inc., Cambridge, MA.; Environmental
    Protection Agency, Washington,  DC. Office of Enforcement-
    1 Oct 92
    The Agency developed the BEN  computer model to calculate
    the  economic benefit a  violator derives from delaying or
    avoiding compliance with environmental statutes. In general,
    the Agency uses the BEN computer model to assist its own
    staff  in developing settlement penalty figures. While the pri-
    mary purpose of the BEN model  is to calculate the economic
    benefit of  noncompliance, the model may also be used to
    calculate the after tax net present value  of a pollution pre-
    vention or mitigation project and to calculate  'cash outs' in
    Superfund  cases. The document, the  BEN User's Manual,
    contains all the  formulas  that make  up the BEN computer
    model and is freely available to the public upon request.
    Specifications:   Sponsored  by Environmental  Protection
    Agency, Washington, DC. Office of Enforcement. 168p.
    Subject  index keywords: Pollution  abatement,  Computer-
    ized  simulation, Benefit cost analysis,  Penalties,  Standards
    compliance, BEN model.

 0514 BEN Model: Calculates Violators' Economic Benefits
   from Noncompliance (Version 4.0) (for Microcomputers)
   Order Number PB94-500998CDH, price: Diskette $140.00
   Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
   Enforcement; Dec 93
   The model  calculates the economic benefit that a company
   gains  by delaying payment necessary  for compliance with
   environmental regulations or permits. While the  primary pur-
   pose of the BEN  model is to calculate the economic benefit
   of  EPA regulation noncompliance, the  model may also be
   used  to calculate the after tax net present value of a pollu-
   tion prevention or mitigation project. BEN is not  limited to
   just environmental regulations;  rather,  it is a cost analysis
   model that  presents savings from delaying or avoiding any
   expenditures. Users are taken through a series of prompts to
   enter  specified costs including  initial  capital  investments,
   nondepreciable expenditures,  annual   expenses,  dates  of
   compliance  and  noncompliance,  date  of penalty  payment,
   useful  life of pollution  control equipment, income  tax rates,
   inflation rate, and discount rate. The savings from not payinq
  are then calculated.
  Specifications: The software is on one 3 1/2 inch diskette,
  720K  double density. Documentation included; may be or-
  dered separately as PB94-141652. Will  be updated  in August
  1994. System: DOS operating system. Requires 232K of hard
  drive space.  Is menu driven. 1  diskette.
  Subject index keywords: Pollution abatement,  Benefit cost
  analysis, Software.

0515  CASHOUT User's Manual for Superfund
  Order Number PB94-141678CDH, price: PC A05/MF A01
  Industrial Economics, Inc., Cambridge, MA.; Environmental
  Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of Enforcement-
  Sep 92
  The U.S. Environmental  Protection Agency (EPA) developed
  the  Superfund CASHOUT computer model  to calculate the
  present value of the cleanup costs at  Superfund sites that
  the government needs to collect from potentially responsible
  parties  (PRPs).  The  CASHOUT  computer model will assist
                                                                                                             87

-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Enforcement
  EPA staff in developing settlement figures for Superfund de
  minimis settlements, commonly referred to as 'cash outs'. De
  minimis settlements entail the early release from liability of
  certain contributors at a Superfund site after they pay their
  fair share  of the total  cleanup costs. Thus, calculating the
  present value of cleanup costs using the CASHOUT comput-
  er model is generally the first step in 'cashing out' PRPs in-
  volved in  a  de minimis settlement. The 'present value' of
  future costs  reflects the fact that a dollar today is different
  (i.e., worth more) than a dollar tomorrow. Cleanup costs to
  be incurred in the future need to  be restated in terms of
  today's dollars to  'cash out' PRPs. Using the present value
  of the total cleanup costs, Agency staff can develop a basis
  from which they can estimate each de minimis contributor's
  share of the total cleanup costs.
  Specifications:  For system on diskette, see PB94-501012.
  Sponsored by Environmental Protection Agency, Washington,
  DC. Office of Enforcement. 76p.
  Subject   index   keywords:   Superfund,  Costs,  User
  manuals(Computer programs).
 0516  CERCLA Enforcement Policy Compendium Update
  Order Number PB92-963623CDH, price: PC$98.00
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Waste Programs Enforcement; Sep 92
  The compendium is a compilation of documents originated
   by the Office of Waste Programs Enforcement, CERCLA En-
  forcement Division. Documents contained  in the 1992 com-
   pendium were issued after August 14, 1990 and are related
   to CERCLA Enforcement The compendium also consists of
   documents  originated by the  Office of  Enforcement and
   Office of Emergency and Remedial Response.
   Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
   posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
   and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
   paper copy or microfiche. 903p.
   Subject Index keywords: Waste management,  Hazardous
   materials. Law enforcement, Superfund.
  0517  CERCLA Implementation of Inspector Training
   Requirements for OSCs/RPMs at the Intermediate Level
   In STEP and First-Line Supervisors
   Order Number PB91-187021CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
   Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
   Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 3 Apr 91
   The directive provides  guidance on how two groups of
   CERCLA staff can meet or be excepted from the training re-
   quirements of EPA Order 3500.1 Inspector Training.
   Specifications:  7p.
   Subject  Index keywords:  Personnel development, Super-
   fund, Waste management, Office of Solid Waste and Emer-
    gency Response, Structured Training  and Evaluation Pro-
    gram.
  0518  CERCLA Implementation of the Training
    Requirements of EPA Order 3500.1. Inspector Training
    Order Number PB91-139659CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
    Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
    Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 19 Oct 89
    The purpose of the directive is to explain how On-Scene Co-
    ordinators  (OSCs) and Remedial Project Managers (RPMs)
    may satisfy  the requirements  for Inspector Training under
    EPA Order 3500.1, or may be granted  an exemption from
    those requirements. An exemption may be granted depend-
 ing on the implementation of the Structured  Training  and
 Evaluation Program (STEP). STEP is a key component of the
 OSC/RPM Support Program created by OSWER. Depending
 on the  various levels in  STEP  -  Basic,  Intermediate,  Ad-
 vanced  or Master - to which  an  OSC/RPM is assigned, an
 exemption may be  granted from the training requirements of
 the Order.
 Specifications: 19p.
 Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste  management.
 Hazardous materials, Personnel development, Office of Solid
 Wastes and  Emergency Response.
0519  Comparative  Analysis of Remedies Selected in the
 Superfund Program during FY 87, FY 88 and FY 89
 Order Number PB91 -139477CDH, price: PC A09/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC.  Office of
  Emergency and Remedial Response; 20 Jun 90
  The  directive  determines  if there are differences between
  remedies selected  at Fund-lead and Enforcement-lead sites.
  For the bulk of the analysis, sites whose  remedial  investiga-
  tion/feasibility study  (RI/FS) was conducted with Superfund
  money (Fund-lead) were compared with those whose Rl/h-b
  was conducted by  potentially responsible parties (PRPs) (En-
  forcement-lead). In addition, sites whose remedial design/re-
  medial action  (RD/RA) is expected to be conducted by PRPs
  were compared with sites where the Fund was expected to
  conduct RD/RA. The  latter  comparison  was developed to
  consider potential  influence where PRPs do not conduct the
  RI/FS, but offer or are expected to conduct the RD/RA.
  Specifications: 179p.
  Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Superfund,
  Waste management, Remedial action, Office of Solid Waste
  and Emergency Response.
 0520  Consent Orders and the Reimbursement Provision
  Under Section 106(b) of CERCLA
  Order  Number PB91-139113CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
   Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
   Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 12 Jun 87
   The directive provides guidance regarding terms of consent
   orders to preclude parties who have signed consent agree-
   ments to subsequently  seek reimbursement under section
   106(b) of CERCLA.
   Specifications:  Portions of this document are not fully legi-
   ble. 6p.
   Subject index keywords: Waste management,  Superfund,
   Hazardous materials,  Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
   Response.
 0521 Consultation on Records of Decision (RODS) for
   Containment-Only Remedies
   Order Number PB91-228734CDH, price: PC A01/MF A01
    Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
    Solid  Waste  and  Emergency Response; 2 Oct 90
    The directive provides Regions  with implementation strategy
    for RODs involving containment.
    Specifications:  5p.
    Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
    Hazardous materials, Office of  Solid Waste and Emergency
    Response.
   88

-------
                                                                     PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Enforcement
 0522  Coordination of EPA and State Actions in Cost
   Recovery
   Order Number PB91-138974CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
   Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
   Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 29 Aug 83
   The directive outlines considerations for promoting Federal/
   State  relations in their  respect cost recovery efforts. Also
   provides  guidance on preparing conditions to cooperative
   agreements.
   Specifications:  Portions of this document are not fully leqi-
   ble. 24p.                                            a
   Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
   Hazardous materials, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
   Response.

 0523  Cost Recovery Actions/Statute of Limitations
   Order  Number PB91-138982CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
   Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
   Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 12 Jun 87
   The directive updates EPA's policy on timing  of cost recov-
   ery action. The directive requests EPA staff to focus atten-
   tion on the accuracy of data being used to  brief Congress on
   the status of cost recovery efforts at sites. In addition, the
   directive encourages the initiation of cost recovery action for
   those  sites where the Statute  of  Limitations date  is ap-
   proaching. The directive  supercedes directive no. 9832.3,
   Timing of CERCLA Cost Recovery Actions,' dated October
   7, 1985.
   Specifications: 6p.
   Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste  management
   Hazardous materials,  Office of Solid  Waste and Emergency
   Response.

 0524 Cost Recovery Actions under CERCLA
   Order Number PB91-138966CDH, price: PC A06/MF A01
   Environmental Protection Agency, Washington,  DC. Office of
   Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 26 Aug 83
   The directive describes the essential  elements that the gov-
   ernment will probably be called upon to prove in  a cost re-
   covery action: the assembly and maintenance of a file, some
   examples  of appropriate documentation for each element of
   the cause  of action, procedures for processing and negotiat-
   ing cost recovery claims, and the mechanics of repayment of
  any recovery to the Fund.
  Specifications:  104p.
  Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste  management
  Hazardous materials, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
  Response.

0525  Cost  Recovery Referrals
  Order Number PB91-138941CDH, price: PC  A02/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 3 Aug 83
  The directive discusses procedures for Regional staff in han-
  dling and documenting upcoming section 107 cost recovery
  referrals in order to meet Department of Justice require-
  ments,  in a memorandum dated August 3,  1983. A second
  memorandum,  dated September 5, 1983, is attached that fur-
  ther clarifies the earlier memorandum. A partial list of docu-
  ments needed to support cost recovery is attached to the
  second memorandum.  These memoranda are supplemented
  by directive no. 9832.0-1 a,  which used to  be  directive no
  9832.4.
   Specifications:  See also PB91-138958. 7p.
  .Subject index keywords:  Superfund, Waste management,
   Hazardous materials, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
   Response.

 0526  Covenants Not to Sue under SARA
   Order Number PB91-139220CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
   Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
   Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 10 Jul 87
   The report updates the Interim Settlement Policy by providing
   guidance  on the implementation  of the mandatory and dis-
   cretionary provisions of SARA in  relation to the use  of cov-
   enants not to sue in consent decrees. Attached to the guid-
   ance is a model covenant not to sue.
   Specifications: 27p.
   Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste treat-
   ment, Liabilities, Superfund Amendments and  Reauthoriza-
   tion Act, Cleanup.

 0527  Endangerment Assessment Guidance
   Order Number PB91-139675CDH,  price: PC A03/MF A01
   Environmental Protection Agency,  Washington, DC.  Office of
   Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 21 Oct 85
  The directive clarifies the requirement that an endangerment
  assessment be  developed to support  all administrative and
  judicial enforcement actions under Section 106  of the Com-
  prehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Li-
  ability Act  (CERCLA) and Section 7003 of the Resource Con-
  servation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Before taking enforce-
  ment action  under these provisions to abate the hazards or
  potential  hazards at a site, the  Environmental Protection
  Agency (EPA) must be able to properly document and justify
  its assertion that an  imminent and substantial endangerment
  to public health or welfare or the environment may exist. The
  endangerment assessment provides the  documentation and
  justification. The endangerment assessment is not necessary
  to support Section 104 actions. It  also  provides guidance on
  the content, timing,  level of detail, format, and resources re-
  quired for the preparation of endangerment assessments.
  Specifications:  Portions of this document are not fully legi-
  ble. 13p.
  Subject index keywords: Superfund,  Waste management,
  Hazardous materials, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
  Response, Endangerment assessment.

0528  Endangerment  Assessment  Guidance
  Order Number PB92-101997CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 22 Nov 85
  The directive clarifies the  requirement that an endangerment
  assessment be developed to support all administrative and
  judicial enforcement actions under Section 106 of the  Com-
  prehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Li-
  ability Act (CERCLA) and Section 7003 of the Resource Con-
  servation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Before taking  enforce-
  ment action under these provisions to abate the hazards or
  potential hazards at a site, the  Environmental  Protection
  Agency (EPA) must be able to properly document and justify
  its assertion that an imminent and  substantial endangerment
  to public health or welfare or the environment may exist. The
  endangerment assessment provides this documentation and
  justification. The endangerment assessment is not necessary
  to support Section 104 actions. It also provides guidance on
                                                                                                              89

-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Enforcement
  the content, timing, level of detail, format, and resources re-
  quired for the preparation of endangerment assessments.
  Specifications:  See also PB92-102144. 20p.
  Subject Index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste man-
  agement, Superfund, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
  Response.
0529 Endangerment Assessment Handbook
  Order Number PB91-139683CDH, price: PC A07/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 22 Nov 85
  The directive provides guidance  on  how to develop an en-
  dangerment assessment and discusses the level of  detail
  that is required. It also addresses how the assessment may
  be affected by various site-specific enforcement concerns.
  Specifications: Portions of this document are not fully legi-
  ble. 141 p.
  Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
  Hazardous materials, Office of Solid Waste and  Emergency
  Response.
0530  Endangerment Assessment Handbook
  Order Number PB92-102144CDH, price: PC A13/MF A03
  PRC Engineering, Inc., Chicago, IL; Life Systems, Inc.,
  Cleveland, OH.*Environmental Protection Agency,
  Washington, DC. Office of Waste Programs Enforcement;
  Aug 85
  Current U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)  policy
  states that an endangerment  assessment is required to sup-
  port all administrative and judicial enforcement actions under
  Section  106(a) of the Comprehensive Environmental Re-
  sponse, Compensation and Liability Act of 1980 (CERCLA)
  and Section 7003 of the Resource Conservation  and Recov-
  ery Act of 1976 (RCRA).  This Handbook provides guidance
  to EPA regional, state and contractor personnel on conduct-
  ing endangerment assessments and preparing the necessary
  documentation. Its primary purpose is to assist individuals in
  the  preparation  of endangerment  assessment  documents
  which will satisfy the enforcement needs of each case. The
  Handbook explains the  use  of  the endangerment  assess-
  ment as an enforcement  tool and  its  relationship to  the re-
  medial investigation (Rl) and  feasibility study (FS) processes
  at a site. It provides guidance on how to develop an  endan-
  germent assessment and discusses the timing, scope and
  level of detail  that are required  and how these factors may
  be affected by site-specific enforcement concerns.
  Specifications:  Also pub. as Life Systems, Inc., Cleveland,
  OH. rept. no. TR-693-24B. See also PB92-101997. Prepared
  in cooperation with Life Systems, Inc., Cleveland, OH. Spon-
  sored by Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC.
  Office of Waste Programs Enforcement. 278p.
  Subject Index keywords: Risk assessment, Hazardous ma-
  terials, Waste management, Superfund, Handbooks, Office of
  Waste Programs Enforcement.
 0531  Enforcement Project Management Handbook
   Order Number PB90-780115CDH, price: PC A22/MF A03
   Booz-Allen and Hamilton, Inc., Bethesda, MD.; Environmental
   Protection Agency, Washington,  DC. Office of Solid Waste
   and Emergency Response; Jul 89
   The publication is a basic reference and training manual to
   assist EPA Superfund field personnel (Remedial Project Man-
   agers and On Scene Coordinators) in planning, negotiating
   and managing potentially responsible party (PRP) searches
  and PRP-lead actions at Superfund sites. It provides an over-
  view of each phase of the Superfund enforcement  process
  and discusses specific roles and responsibilities of the RPM/
  OSC in the process.
  Specifications:  See also PB87-183133 and PB87-183141.
  Sponsored by Environmental Protection Agency, Washington,
  DC. Office of Solid Waste and  Emergency Response.  508p.
  Subject  index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste dis-
  posal.
0532  Enforcement Project Management Handbook
  Order Number PB91-186999CDH, price: PC A23/MF A03
  Booz-Allen and Hamilton,  Inc., Bethesda, MD.; Environmental
  Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of Solid Waste
  and Emergency Response; Jan  91
  The handbook has been  prepared as a basic reference and
  training manual to assist RPMs  (Remedial Project Managers)
  and OSCs (On-Scene Coordinators)  in planning, negotiating
  and managing various enforcement actions.
  Specifications:   Supersedes PB90-780115. Sponsored  by
  Environmental Protection  Agency, Washington,  DC. Office of
  Solid Waste and Emergency Response. 538p.
  Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste dis-
  posal.
0533 Enforcement Project Management Handbook
  Order Number PB93-963602CDH, price: PC A18/MF A04
  Environmental Protection  Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Solid Waste and Emergency Response; May 93
  The Handbook is intended to be a basic reference and train-
  ing manual to assist Remedial Project Managers (RPMs) and
  On-Scene Coordinators (OSCs) in planning, negotiating, and
  managing Potentially Responsible Party (PRP)  searches and
  PRP-lead actions. It provides an  overview of each phase of
  the enforcement process and  discusses specific roles and
  responsibilities of the RPM/OSC in the process. Procedures
  and information contained in the document are based  on ex-
  isting and draft EPA policy and  guidance. Specific documents
  are referenced as sources of  additional  information on par-
  ticular topics.
  Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
  posit  account required (minimum  deposit $200  U.S., Canada,
  and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
  paper copy or microfiche. Supersedes PB91-186999. 404p.
  Subject index  keywords: Superfund, Hazardous materials,
  Waste disposal.
 0534  Entry and Continued Access under CERCLA
  Order Number PB91-138867CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 5 Jun 87
  The directive describes EPA's  policy on entry  and continued
  access  to facilities by EPA officers, employees, and repre-
  sentatives for purposes  of response and civil enforcement
  activities under CERCLA. The policy recommends that EPA
  should seek to obtain access through consent.
  Specifications:  See also PB91-138859. 18p.
  Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
   Hazardous materials, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
   Response.
 90

-------
                                                                    PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Enforcement
 0535   Environmental Compliance Branch, Standard
   Operating Procedures and Quality Assurance Manual
   Revision 1
   Order Number PB91-233650CDH, price: PC A19/MF A04
   Environmental Protection Agency, Athens, GA.
   Environmental Services Div; 1  Feb 91
   The  document contains the field procedures developed by
   US-EPA, Region IV, ESD for investigating hazardous waste
   sites for the FtCRA and Superiund programs, performance of
   NPDES inspection and air monitoring. In particular,  sampling
   of environmental media  and waste,  sample handling  and
   preservation, decontamination of field  equipment, installation
   of monitoring wells, and field quality  assurance procedures
   are  described.  Sampling equipment  is  discussed  and de-
   scribed. Surveying requirements for site  characterization are
   given.
   Specifications: 449p.
   Subject  index keywords:  Hazardous  materials,  Site  sur-
   veys, Waste management, EPA region  4.     •.

 0536  EPA Interim Guidance on Indemnification of
   Superfund Response Action  Contractors Under Section
   119 of SARA
   Order Number PB91-139402CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
   Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
   Emergency and Remedial Response; 6 Oct 87
   The directive provides guidance to EPA  Regional personnel
   on EPA Superfund response  action contractor indemnifica-
   tion, including EPA  interim guidelines, procedures for proc-
   essing indemnification requests, and  model  indemnification
   contract language.
   Specifications: 38p.
   Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management
   Hazardous materials, Office  of Solid Waste and Emergency
   Response.

 0537 Evaluating Mixed Funding Settlements under
   CERCLA
   Order Number PB91-139238CDH, price: PC A03/MF  A01
   Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
   Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 20 Oct 87
   The report provides  guidance  to the Regions for evaluating
   settlement proposals that the Regions  may receive from  po-
   tentially responsible parties for EPA to provide mixed funding
   at CERCLA sites. The  goals of the guidance  are to  encour-
   age, the Regions  to consider mixed  funding  settlements,
   present a method  for mixed funding, and to present criteria
  for evaluating good versus poor candidates.
  Specifications:  20p.
  Subject index keywords: Financing,  Government policies,
  Waste treatment, Superfund, Comprehensive  Environmental
  Response.

0538 Evaluation of, and Additional Guidance on, Issuance
  of Unilateral Administrative Orders (UAOs) for RD/RA
  Order Number PB91-201764CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 20 Jun 91
  The purpose of the directive is to present the  results of a
  recent  evaluation conducted by the Office  of  Waste Pro-
  grams  Enforcement (OWPE) of the  selection process EPA
  uses in issuing  UAOs to  Potentially  Responsible  Parties
  (PRPs) for  RD/RA under  CERCLA; and, based on the eval-
   uation,  to  give  further guidance on  the  process  used to
   select recipients of UAOs.
   Specifications:  6p.
   Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
   Remedial action, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Re-
   sponse,  Record of Decision, Potentially responsible parties.

 0539  Expanded Civil Judicial Referral Procedures
   Order Number PB91-139766CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
   Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
   Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 28 Aug 86
   The directive provides guidance on procedures for civil judi-
   cial referrals to the Department of Justice. The memorandum
   expands the current  direct referral  program,  indicates that
   Headquarters should  not  establish mandatory requirements
   for pre-referral negotiations, mandates use of 'hold action'
   cases only for strategic or tactical  reasons and  offers guid-
   ance on the preparation of bankruptcy cases.
   Specifications: See also PB91-139774. 16p.
   Subject  index keywords: Superfund, Waste  management,
   Hazardous  materials, Office of Solid Waste  and Emergency
   Response.

0540  Expansion of Direct Referral of Cases to the
   Department of Justice
   Order Number PB91-139790CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
   Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
   Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 14 Jan 88
   The  directive provides guidance to EPA Headquarters and
   Regional personnel regarding procedures to follow in imple-
   menting the expanded direct referral agreement. Prior guid-
   ance  on  direct referrals appears in a November 28, 1983,
   memorandum entitiled,  'Implementation of Direct Referrals
  for Civil Cases Beginning December 1, 1983.' That guidance
  is  superseded to the extent that the  current  guidance  re-
  places or changes procedures  set forth therein; otherwise
  the 1983  document remains in effect.
  Specifications:  16p.
  Subject index keywords:  Superfund,  Waste management,
  Hazardous materials, Office of Solid Waste and  Emergericy
  Response.

0541  Final EPA Policy on the Inclusion of Environmental
  Auditing Provisions in Enforcement Settlements
  Order Number PB92-102094CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office  of
  Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 14 Nov 86
  The purpose of the directive is  to provide Agency enforce-
  ment personnel with general criteria for and guidance on se-
  lecting judicial and  administrative  enforcement  cases  in
  which  EPA will seek to include environmental auditing provi-
  sions among terms of any settlement.
  Specifications: 73p.
  Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials,  Superfund,
  Waste management, Office  of Solid Waste and Emergency
  Response.
                                                                                                              91

-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Enforcement
0542  Final Guidance on Preparing Waste-In Lists and
  Volumetric Rankings for Release to Potentially
  Responsible Parties (PRPs) under CERCLA ('Waste-In'
  Guidance)
  Order Number PB91-187005CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 22 Feb 91
  The directive provides guidance on the compilation and re-
  lease of waste-in lists and volumetric rankings to  help Re-
  gions comply with the information release requirements  of
  CERCLA section 122(e) and the information release and ex-
  change policies outlined in OSWER directives 9835.12 and
  9834.10.
  Specifications: 30p.
  Subject index keywords: Waste management, Superfund,
  Notification procedures, Hazardous materials, Office of Solid
  Waste and Emergency Response.
0543   First 125 De Minimis Settlements: Statistics from
  EPA's De Minimis Database
  Order Number PB94-963606CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Oct 93
  Under Section 122(g)  of the Comprehensive Environmental
  Response,  Compensation,  and Liability Act (CERCLA),  EPA
  is encouraged to reach settlements with two types of parties:
  de minimis waste contributors and de minimis landowners.
  Since 1986, when Section  122(g) was passed as part of the
  Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization Act,  EPA has
  entered into about 125 de minimis settlements, thereby re-
  solving the liability of more than 6,000 parties. In an effort to
  facilitate the greater use of de minimis settlements, EPA has
  developed  the De Minimis  Database,  a comprehensive
  system designed to track over 100 data elements for each
  settlement. EPA is using this system to track and analyze all
  finalized  de minimis settlements.  This  report summarizes
  data maintained in the De Minimis Database. The information
  contained in the database is drawn from several sources:
  final  de  minimis  settlement documents  (including  attach-
  ments such as settlor lists and  signature pages); a survey
  questionnaire completed  by EPA Regional personnel for
  each settlement; CERCLIS (the Comprehensive Environmen-
  tal   Response, Compensation,  and  Liability  Information
  System); and the ROD Annual Reports.
  Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
  posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
  and  Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available  in
  paper copy or microfiche. 25p.
  Subject  Index keywords: Hazardous wastes, Waste man-
  agement, Data base management, Office of Solid Waste and
  Emergency Response, De minimis settlements.
 0544  Guidance of the Use of Stipulated Penalties in
  Hazardous Waste Consent Decrees
  Order Number PB91-139360CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 27 Sep 89
  The directive provides guidance on the use of stipulated pen-
  alties in hazardous waste consent  decrees. The  directive
  supplements directive no. 9835.2  'Guidance on Draft Con-
  sent  Decrees in  Hazardous Waste  Cases,' dated May  1,
  1985.
  Specifications: 22p.
  Subject index keyword!}: Superfund, Waste management,
  Hazardous materials, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
  Response.
0545  Guidance on Applicability of EPA Order 3500.1 to
  CERCLA Staff
  Order Number PB91-139642CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 28 Nov 88
  The  directive defines, through guidance to the Regions,
  which CERCLA staff are subject to the requirements of EPA
  order 3500.1. The order established training requirements for
  compliance inspectors and field investigators.
  Specifications: Portions of this document are not fully  legi-
  ble. 6p.
  Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
  Hazardous materials, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
  Response.
0546   Guidance on CERCLA Section 106 Judicial  Actions
  Order Number PB91-139428CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 24 Feb 89
  The  directive provides criteria for consideration in selecting
  and initiating CERCLA section 106 judicial actions. The guid-
  ance also identifies  and discusses issues  that should be  con-
  sidered in preparation of a section 106 referral.
  Specifications: 12p.
  Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste  management,
  Hazardous materials, Office of Solid Waste  and  Emergency
  Response.
0547   Guidance on CERCLA Settlements with De Micromis
  Waste Contributors
  Order Number PB93-963619CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
  Environmental  Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Emergency and Remedial Response; 30 Jul 93
  The purpose of the memorandum is to provide guidance on
  using  CERCLA's  settlement authorities  to resolve   the
  CERCLA liability of parties who have contributed even less
  hazardous substances to a site than the de minimis parties
  the Agency  traditionally pursues. These parties  will  herein-
  after be referred to as 'de micromis' parties. The memoran-
  dum describes the  types of situations in which a Region may
  find  that it is in the public interest to exercise enforcement
  discretion by offering de micromis settlements. The guidance
  also explains how to use EPA's existing  settlement authority
  in an expeditious manner to resolve the  liability of de micro-
  mis  parties and to  grant them the full extent of contribution
  protection available under the statute.
  Specifications: Paper copy available on  Standing Order, de-
  posit account required (minimum deposit $225 U.S., Canada,
  and Mexico; all others $450). Single copies  also available in
  paper copy or microfiche. 18p.
  Subject  index keywords: Superfund, Hazardous materials,
  Waste disposal, Lawsuits.
 92

-------
                                                                    PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Enforcement
 0548  Guidance on CERCLA 106(a) Unilateral
   Administrative Orders for Remedial Designs and
   Remedial Actions
   Order Number PB91-139089CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
   Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
   Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 13 Mar 90
   The directive discusses section 106 unilateral orders and the
   CERCLA remedial program, and statutory requirements and
   policy factors for issuing section 106 unilateral orders for re-
   medial designs and remedial actions. Key provisions of uni-
   lateral orders and specialized forms and use of such orders
   also are discussed. The directive supplements directive no.
   9833.0, entitled  'Guidance on the  Use  and Issuance of Ad-
   ministrative Orders Under Section  106,' dated September 8
   1983,  and  directive no.  9833.0-2b 'Model  Administrative
   Order  for Remedial  Designs and Remedial Action,'  dated
   March 30, 1990.
   Specifications:  See also PB91-139097. 38p.
   Subject index  keywords: Superfund, Hazardous  materials
   Waste management, Office of Solid Waste and Emerqencv
   Response.

 0549  Guidance on Documenting Decisions Not to Take
   Cost Recovery Actions
   Order Number PB91-139048CDH, price:  PC A02/MF A01
   Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
   Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 7 Jun 88
   The  directive provides  information to  Regional  Superfund
   personnel on  the content of  close-out  memoranda  that
   should be written for each site where EPA does not intend,
   on the basis of certain  information, to pursue an action for
   cost recovery of unreimbursed Superfund monies.
   Specifications:  10p.
   Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste  management
   Hazardous materials, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
   Response.

0550   Guidance on Drafting Consent Decrees in
   Hazardous Waste Cases
   Order Number PB91-139345CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
   Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
   Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 1 May 85
   The  directive focuses on  the  consent decree  provisions
  which are vital to settlement in hazardous  waste cases, and
  are handled differently or not at all under other  programs.
  The  directive  supplements directive  no. 9835.0 'Interim
  CERCLA Settlement Policy,' dated December 5, 1984.
  Specifications:  26p.
  Subject index keywords:  Superfund, Waste management
  Hazardous materials, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
  Response.

0551  Guidance on Federal Superfund Liens
  Order Number PB91-139055CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Emergency and Remedial Response; 22 Sep 87
  The directive establishes guidance on the use of Federal
  liens  to enhance  Superfund cost recovery. Section  107(f) of
  the Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization Act of 1986
  adds a new section 107(1)  to CERCLA, which provides for
  the establishment of a Federal  lien in favor of the United
  States upon property that is the subject  of a removal or re-
  medial action. The guidance provides: (1) analysis of statuto-
  ry issues  regarding the  nature and scope to the lien, (2)
   policy on filing  a Federal lien to support a cost recovery
   action, and (3)  procedures  for filing a  notice of lien and
   taking an 'in rem' action to recover the costs of a lien.
   Specifications:  12p.
   Subject index keywords: Superfund,  Waste  management,
   Hazardous materials, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
   Response.

 0552  Guidance on Landowner Liability under  Section
   107(a)(1) of CERCLA, De Minimis Settlements under
   Section 122(g)(1)(B) of CERCLA, and Settlements with
   Prospective Purchasers of Contaminated Property
   Order Number PB91-139444CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
   Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
   Waste Programs Enforcement; 6 Jun 89
   The purpose of the directive is to  provide general guidance
   on landowner liability under the Comprehensive Environmen-
   tal Response,  Compensation, and  Liability  Act of  1980
   ('CERCLA'), as amended by the Superfund Amendments and
   Reauthorization Act of 1986,  Pub.L. No.99-499 ('SARA'), 42
   U.S.C. S9601  et seq., and to provide specific  guidance on
   which  landowners  qualify for de minimis  settlements under
   Section 122(g)(1)(B) and on structuring such settlements. Be-
   cause  the nature of a de minimis settlement with a landown-
   er will  differ substantially from a de minimis settlement with
   waste  contributors,  it will usually be more efficient to draft
   such   agreements   separately.  In   addition, because  the
   Agency has received numerous requests from prospective
   purchasers of  contaminated  property for covenants not to
   sue, the memorandum sets forth Agency policy on this issue.
   Specifications:  Portions of this document are  not fully legi-
   ble. 59p.
   Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
   Hazardous materials, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
   Response.

0553 Guidance on Premium Payments in  CERCLA
   Settlements
   Order Number PB91-139410CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
   Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
   Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 17 Nov 88
   The directive provides guidance on  the use of premium pay-
   ments in CERCLA settlements. It describes the  key features
   of a premium  payment settlement,  considerations regarding
  timing of the settlement, and the factors to be considered in
  deciding if a premium should be accepted.
  Specifications:  19p.
  Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
  Hazardous materials, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
  Response.

0554  Guidance  on Preparing Waste-in Lists and
  Volumetric Rankings for Release to Potentially
  Responsible Parties (PRPs) under CERCLA
  Order Number PB92-963606CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Emergency and Remedial Response; 22 Feb 91
  The directive provides guidance on the  compilation and  re-
  lease of waste-in lists and volumetric rankings  to help Re-
  gions comply with the information  release requirements of
  CERCLA section 122(e) and the information release and ex-
  change policies outlined in OSWER directives 9835.12 and
  9834.10.
                                                                                                             93

-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Enforcement
  Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
  posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
  and Mexico;  all others $400). Single copies also available in
  paper copy or microfiche. 29p.
  Subject index keywords:  Superfund, Waste management,
  Hazardous materials, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
  Response.
0555  Guidance on Procedures for Submitting CERCLA
  Section 106(b) Reimbursement Petitions and on EPA
  Review of Those Petitions
  Order Number PB92-963610CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Waste Programs Enforcement; 29 Jun 92
  The  directive describes the procedures for  submitting a
  CERCLA Section  106(b) petition.  In addition, the  document
  describes EPA's process for reviewing the petitions.
  Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order,  de-
  posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
  and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
  paper copy or microfiche. 21 p.
  Subject Index keywords:  Superfund, Hazardous materials,
  Waste management, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
  Response.
0556   Guidance Regarding  CERCLA Enforcement against
  Bankrupt Parties
  Order Number PB91-139014CDH,  price: PC A03/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency,  Washington,  DC.  Office of
  Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 24 May 84
  The directive assists the Regions  in developing CERCLA en-
  forcement actions against  bankrupt parties. The guidance is
  intended to  encourage  agressive  enforcement against insol-
  vent parties and ensure national  consistency in current  and
  future bankruptcy cases brought  by the Agency. The guid-
  ance is supplemented by directive no. 9832.7-1 a, which used
  to be directive no. 9832.8,  'Revised Hazardous Waste Bank-
  ruptcy Guidance,' dated May 23, 1986.
  Specifications: See also PB91-139022. 47p.
  Subject index keywords: Superfund, Hazardous  materials,
  Waste  management, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
  Response.
 0557  Initiation of PRP-Financed Remedial Design in
  Advance of Consent Decree Entry (Final)
  Order Number PB91-139394CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 18 Nov 88
  The directive addresses a process for expediting the  initi-
  ation of response work by potentially responsible  parties  at
  sites where agreements with PRPs have been reached, but
  where  consent decrees have not yet been entered by the
  court.
  Specifications:  8p.
  Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
   Hazardous materials, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
   Response.
 0558   Interim Cashout Settlement Procedures
   Order Number PB92-963609CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
   Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
   Waste  Programs  Enforcement; 7 Jan 92
   The directive addresses certain issues related to  Superfund
   cashout settlements. These interim procedures provides ap-
                                                   i
  proaches to resolve certain issues which arose in recent ca-
  shout settlements.
  Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
  posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
  and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
  paper copy or microfiche. 15p.
  Subject index keywords: Superfund,  Waste management,
  Hazardous materials, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
  Response, Cashout settlements.

0559  Interim CERCLA Settlement Policy
  Order Number PB91-139329CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 5  Dec 84
  The directive discusses private party cleanup and contribu-
  tion proposals under CERCLA. It is supplemented by direc-
  tives no. 9835.2 and 9834.2.
  Specifications:  Portions of this document are not fully legi-
  ble. 24p.
  Subject index keywords: Superfund,  Waste management,
  Hazardous materials, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
  Response.
0560  Interim Guidance on Notice Letters, Negotiations,
  and Information Exchange
  Order Number PB91-139253CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 19 Oct 87
  The report provides  guidance to  the Regions on issuing
  notice  letters, entering into negotiations,  and  exchanging in-
  formation with potentially responsible parties. The  guidance
  contains a discussion of the  section  122(e) special notice
  procedures and the subsequent negotiation moratorium.
  Specifications: 43p.
  Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste treat-
  ment, Liabilities.
0561  Interim Guidance on Potentially  Responsible Party
  Participation in Remedial Investigations and Feasibility
  Studies
  Order Number PB91-139337CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 16 May 88
  The directive sets forth  policies and  procedures governing
  potentially responsible party participation in the remedial in-
  vestigations and feasibility studies process, including initiation
  of PRP searches,  PRP notifications, development of agree-
  ments, and oversight of  RI/FS activities. The document su-
  persedes directive  no. 9835.1 'Participation of Potentially Re-
  sponsible Parties  in Development  of RIs and FSs  under
  CERCLA,' dated March 3, 1984.
  Specifications:  Portions of this document are not fully legi-
  ble. 42p.
  Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
   Hazardous materials, Remedial action, Office of Solid  Waste
  and Emergency Response, Potentially responsible parties.
 94

-------
                                                                     PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Enforcement
 0562  Interim Guidance on Settlements with De Minimis
   Waste Contributors under Section 122(g) of SARA
   Order Number PB91-139196CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
   Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
   Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 19 Jun 87
   The directive provides interim guidance for determining which
   potentially responsible parties qualify for treatment as de
   minimus waste contributors pursuant to section  122(g)(1)(A)
   of the Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization Act of
   1986,  and to present interim  guidelines for settlement  with
   such de minimus parties pursuant to section 122(g) of SARA.
   The directive is superseded by directive  9834.7-1 A 'Interim
   Model CERCLA Section 122(g)(4) De  Minimus Waste Con-
   tributor Consent Decree and  Administrative Order  on  Con-
   sent,' dated October 19, 1987.
   Specifications: 34p.
   Subject index  keywords: Superfund,  Waste management,
   Hazardous materials, Office of Solid Waste and Emerqency
   Response.

0563   Interim Guidance: Streamlining the  CERCLA
   Settlement Decision Process
   Order Number PB91-139386CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
   Environmental Protection Agency, Washington,  DC. Office of
   Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 12 Feb 87 '
   The  directive provides guidance to  streamline and  improve
   the  CERCLA settlement decision process. The guidance ad-
   dresses three areas of settlement process: (1)  negotiation
   preparation, (2)  management review, and  (3) criteria for ter-
   minating or continuing negotiations.  The directive is supple-
   mented by directive no. 9835.4-1 a.
  Specifications:  Portions of this document are not fully legi-
  ble. 15p.

  Subject index keywords:  Superfund, Hazardous materials,
  Waste  management, Office of  Solid Waste and Emergency
  Response.

0564  Interim Guidelines for Preparing Nonbinding
  Preliminary Allocations of Responsibility
  Order Number PB92-102078CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 1991
  The directive discusses Section 122(e)(3)  of the Superfund
  Amendments and Reauthorization Act of 1986  (SARA), Pub.
  L. No. 99-499, which amended the Comprehensive Environ-
  mental  Response,  Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980
  (CERCLA), 42 U.S.C. Sections  9601  et seq., which requires
  the  Environmental  Protection  Agency (EPA) to  develop
  guidelines for preparing nonbinding preliminary allocations of
  responsibility (NBARs). As defined in Section 122(e)(3)(A), an
  NBAR is an allocation by EPA among potentially responsible
  parties (PRPs) of percentages of total response costs at a
  facility. SARA authorizes EPA to provide NBARs at its discre-
  tion.  NBARs are  a tool EPA may use  in appropriate cases to
  promote remedial settlements.
  Specifications:  11 p.
  Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Superfund
 Waste management, Office  of Solid Waste and Emergency
 Response,  Nonbinding Preliminary Allocations of  Responsi-
 bility.
  0565  Interim Model CERCLA Section 122(g) (4) De
    Minimis Waste Contributor Consent Decree and
    Administrative Order on Consent
    Order Number PB91-139204CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
    Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
    Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 19 Oct 87
    The report provides interim model language to assist the Re-
    gions in drafting de minimi's waste contributor consent de-
    crees and  administrative orders on  consent under section
    122(g)(4) of CERCLA,  as  amended by SARA.  There are
    models attached to the memorandum.
    Specifications: 20p.
    Subject index keywords:  Hazardous materials, Waste dis-
    posal, Law(Jurisprudence), Superfund.

 0566   Interim Policy on Mixed Funding Settlements
    Involving the Preauthorization of States or Political
   Subdivisions
   Order Number PB91-139246CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
   Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
   Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 27 May 88
   The  report  establishes EPA's  interim policy on  the use of
   mixed funding/preauthorization settlements of States or polit-
   ical subdivisions that are potentially responsible  parties. The
   guidance clarified that States and political  subdivisions are
   eligible to file preauthorization claims against the  Fund when
   they are acting pursuing  to settlement agreement. The direc-
   tive supplements directive  No.  9834.9 'Evaluating  Mixed
   Funding  Agreements  Under CERCLA,' dated October 20
   1987.
   Specifications:  6p.
   Subject index keywords:  Government policies, Financing,
   Waste treatment, Superfund.

 0567  Issuance of Administrative Orders for Immediate
   Removal Actions
   Order Number  PB91-139105CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
   Environmental  Protection Agency, Washington,  DC. Office of
   Solid Waste  and Emergency Response; 21 Feb 84
   The directive sets forth  guidance on issuing  administrative
   orders for immediate removal actions under CERCLA. The
   guidance should be used in conjunction with the recently
   issued 'Guidance on the  Use and Issuance of Administrative
   Orders under Section 106(a) of CERCLA,' dated September
   8, 1983.
   Specifications: Portions of  this document are not fully leqi-
   ble. 15p.
  Subject  index keywords: Superfund, Waste  management,
  Hazardous materials, Remedial action, Office of Solid Waste
  and Emergency Response.

0568  Issuance of Administrative Orders Under Section
  3013 of the Resource  Conservation and Recovery Act
  Order Number PB91-140111CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Solid Waste and Emergency  Response; 30 May 86
  Section 17 of the Solid Waste Disposal Act Amendments of
  1980 (P.L 96482) added Section 3013 to the Resource Con-
  servation and Recovery Act  of  1976  (RCRA).  The directive
  provides  guidance on the use of that section  and replaces
  earlier guidance issued September 11, 1981. Under current
  delegation authority Section  3013 Administrative Orders are
  issued by Regional Administrator (RAs) with  the advance
                                                                                                              95

-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Enforcement
  concurrence of the Director, Office of Waste Programs En-
  forcement (OWPE) except in cases of national significance
  or multi-regional cases. Then the director, OWPE, issues the
  Orders.  The Assistant Administrator for  Enforcement and
  Compliance  Monitoring (OECM), consults as requested on
  orders, refers Section 3013 judicial actions to the Depart-
  ment of Justice, and sends notices of such actions to the ap-
  propriate RA and the  Director OWPE. Further redelegation is
  currently under review.
  Specifications: 50p.
  Subject Index keywords:  Waste management, Superfund,
  Hazardous materials,  Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
  Response.
0569  Issuance of Final Revised Guidance on the Use and
  Issuance of Administrative Orders Under Section 7003 of
  the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA)
  Order Number PB91-140129CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 26 Sep 84
  The directive discusses guidance on the use and issuance of
  Administrative Orders under Section 7003 of RCRA  where
  there is an  emiminent  and substantial  endangerment  to
  public health and the environment. In order to  issue a Sec-
  tion 7003 order, the Administrator  must  possess evidence
  'that the handling, storage, treatment, transportation or dis-
  posal of any solid waste  or hazardous waste may present an
  imminent and substantial endangerment to health or the en-
  vironment' (42 U.S.C. Section 6973). Additionally, Section
  7003 requires that the Administrator provide notice to the af-
  fected State prior to issuance of the order. Each of these re-
  quirements is discussed in the directive.
  Specifications:  25p.
  Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
  Hazardous materials, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
  Response.
 0570  Liability of Corporate Shareholders and Successor
  Corporations for Abandoned Sites Under the
  Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation
  and Liability Act
  Order Number PB91-139030CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
   Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 13 Jun 84
  The directive identifies legal principles bearing  on the extent
   to  which corporate shareholders and successor corporations
   may be held liable for response costs that arise as a result
   of  a release at a hazardous waste facility.
   Specifications: 20p.
   Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste  management,
   Hazardous materials, Remedial action, Office of Solid Waste
   and Emergency Response.
 0571 Limiting Lead Transfers to Private Parties during
   Discrete Phases of  the Remedial Process
   Order Number PB92-963602CDH, price: PC A01/MF A01
   Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
   Waste Programs Enforcement; 14 Nov 91
   In order to avoid delays  caused  by remedial process lead
   changes from EPA  to  private parties, this directive  recom-
   mends to Regions that they avoid letting PRPs assume the
   lead In the middle of a discrete phase of the process (e.g.,
   RI/FS,  RD, or RA), and  take preemptive steps to avoid
   delays when making lead  changes between the RD and RA.
  Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
  posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
  and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
  paper copy or microfiche. 5p.
  Subject index keywords;: Superfund,  Waste management,
  Hazardous materials, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
  Response.

0572  Methodologies for Implementation of CERCLA
  Section 122(g) (1) (A) De Minimis Waste Contributor
  Settlements Proposals and Agreements
  Order Number PB91-139212CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 20 Dec 89
  The report provides assistance to the Regional case staff in
  the evaluation  and development of de  minimis contributor
  settlement proposals and agreements. The  methodologies
  presented are general suggestions, recognizing the site-spe-
  cific aspects of each site.
  Specifications: 26p.
  Subject index keywords: Hazardous wastes, Waste dispos-
  al, Waste treatment, Superfund.

0573  Methodology for Early De Minimis Waste
  Contributor Settlements under CERCLA Section 122(g)
  (1) (A)
  Order Number PB92-963607CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
  Environmental  Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Waste Programs Enforcement; 2 Jun 92
  The directive sets forth procedures for identifying early de
  minimis candidates for potential de minimis settlements early
  in the  response process (for example, prior to the signature
  of a Record of Decision), and provides a methodology for
  developing such settlements. The report also provides practi-
  cal assistance in developing early de minimis  settlement pro-
  posals and  agreements.  It supplements OSWER Directive
  9847.7-1 B  'Methodologies for Implementation of CERCLA
  Section 122(g)(1)(A) De  Minimis Waste  Contributor Settle-
  ments', dated December 20, 1989.
  Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
  posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
  and Mexico; all others $400).  Single copies also available in
  paper  copy or microfiche.  See also PB91-139212. 22p.
  Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
   Hazardous materials, Office of Solid Waste and  Emergency
   Response.

 0574  Model Administrative Order on  Consent for
   Removal Actions
   Order Number PB93-963605CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
   Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
   Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Mar 93
   The model  order on consent for removal actions embodies
   the language  that EPA regional offices should use when is-
   suing  removal administrative orders on consent.
   Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
   posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
   and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
   paper copy or microfiche. 29p.
   Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste man-
   agement, Remedial action, Superfund, Record of Decision,
   Waste removal.

-------
                                                                     PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Enforcement
 0575  Model Informational Notice Letter to Local
   Governments
   Order Number PB91-187013CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
   Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
   Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 7 May 91
   The directive  is a model letter which will be used to  notify
   local governments of EPA's activities which will take  place
   within their jurisdiction at a Superfund site.
   Specifications:  8p.
   Subject index keywords:  Local government, Superfund, No-
   tification procedures,  Waste  management, Office  of  Solid
   Waste and Emergency Response.

 0576  Model Litigation Report for CERCLA Sections 106
   and 107 and RCRA Section 7003
   Order Number PB91-139451CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
   Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
   Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 21  Jun 89
   The directive supplements previous Agency guidance entitled
   'Model Litigation Report  Outline and  Guidance'  (OECM,
   August 23, 1984), which addressed the preparation of  a liti-
   gation package under most statutes, but  excluded, among
   others, packages to be prepared for prosecution of civil judi-
   cial actions under CERCLA Sections 106 and 107 and RCRA
   Section 7003.  The model is intended for use in  all civil judi-
   cial cases referred to the Department of Justice for prosecu-
   tion  under CERCLA Sections 106 and 107 and  RCRA  Sec-
   tion  7003. For those actions referred in conjunction with  a
   settlement, a full litigation report is  not required. The docu-
   ment also does not specifically address preparation of litiga-
   tion  reports  for prosecution  of  penalty  actions under
   CERCLA Sections 106(b), 109 or 122(1), although many sec-
   tions of the document may be applicable to the preparation
   of such litigation reports.
   Specifications: 47p.
   Subject index keywords:  Superfund, Waste  management,
   Hazardous  materials, Lawsuits, Office of Solid  Waste and
   Emergency Response.

0577  Model Notice Letters
   Order Number  PB91-139279CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
   Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
   Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 2 Jul 89
  The report includes the model notice letters to  be  used in
  preparing site-specific  notice letters  to PRP's.  The letters
  notify Potential responsible parties of their potential CERCLA
  liability.
  Specifications: 41 p.
  Subject index  keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste treat-
  ment, Liabilities.

0578  Model Statement of Work for a Remedial
  Investigation and Feasibility Study Conducted by
  Potentially Responsible Parties
  Order Number PB91-139436CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC: Office of
  Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 2 Jun 89
  The directive provides potentially responsible parties with di-
  rection  in performing tasks that are required to successfully
  complete a  remedial investigation  and feasibility  study.  The
  model statement of work is used in conjunction with OERR's
  October 1988 RI/FS guidance, and closely follows the model
  RI/FS administrative order on consent. The directive supple-
  ments directive  no. 9355.3-01.
   Specifications: 35p.
   Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste  management,
   Hazardous materials, Remedial action, Office of Solid Waste
   and Emergency Response, Potentially responsible parties.

 0579  Model Unilateral Administrative Order for Removal
   Response Activities
   Order Number PB93-963606CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
   Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
   Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Mar 93
   The directive embodies the language that EPA regional of-
   fices should use when issuing removal unilateral administra-
   tive orders.
   Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
   posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
   and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
   paper copy or microfiche. 23p.
   Subject index keywords:  Hazardous materials, Waste man-
   agement, Superfund, Waste removal.

 0580  Model Unilateral Order for Remedial Design and
   Remedial Action
   Order  Number PB91-139097CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
   Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
   Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 30 Mar 90
   The directive establishes a model order for remedial design
   and remedial action. The purpose of the model  is to improve
   the quality of remedial actions performed by private parties,
   promote consistency among the Regions, and to expedite
   potentially  responsible  parties  (PRP)-lead  cleanups  at
   CERCLA sites.  The  directive  supplements  directive  no.
   9833.0-1 (a) entitled, 'Guidance on CERCLA 106(a) Unilateral
   Administrative Orders  for Remedial Designs and Remedial
   Actions,' dated March 13, 1990.
   Specifications:  See also PB91-139089. 49p.
   Subject index keywords:  Superfund, Waste management,
   Hazardous materials, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
   Response.

0581   Multi-Media Settlements of Enforcement  Claims
   Order Number PB91-139808CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
   Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
   Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 6 Feb 90
  The directive explains EPA policy disfavoring judicial and ad-
   ministrative  settlements which  include  releases of  potential
  enforcement claims.
  Specifications:  9p.
  Subject index keywords:  Superfund,  Waste management,
  Hazardous materials, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
  Response.

0582  Multi-Media Settlements of Enforcement Claims
  Order Number PB92-102136CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 6 Feb 90
  The purpose of the directive is to provide guidance which ex-
  plains (1) EPA policy strongly disfavoring judicial and admin-
  istrative settlements of enforcement cases which include re-
  leases of potential enforcement claims  under statutes which
  are  not named in the complaint and do  not serve as the
  basis for the Agency bringing the enforcement action, and
  (2) how approval for any multi-media settlements of enforce-
                                                                                                              97

-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Enforcement
  merit claims should be obtained in civil judicial enforcement
  cases in the Region and at Headquarters.
  Specifications:  7p.
  Subject index keywords: Hazardous  materials, Superfund,
  Waste management, Office of Solid Waste and  Emergency
  Response.

0583  Municipal Settlements
  Order Number PB91-139311CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 6 Dec 89
  The directive establishes EPA's interim policy on settlements
  involving municipal waste.
  Specifications: 39p.
  Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
  Municipal  wastes,  Remedial  action,  Municipal  Settlement
  Policy, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response.

0584  Policy for Enforcement Actions  against
  Transporters under CERCLA
  Order Number PB91-138859CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 23 Dec 85
  The directive defines parties which are  liable for  response
  costs under section 107(A)(4) of CERCLA, including persons
  who transport hazardous substances to disposal or treatment
  facilities.
  Specifications: See also PB91-138867. 8p.
  Subject Index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
  Hazardous materials, Office  of Solid Waste and Emergency
  Response.
0585   Policy on Recovering Indirect Cost in CERCLA
  Section 107 Cost Recovery Actions
  Order Number PB91-138990CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC.  Office of
  Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 27 Jun 86
  The directive clarifies EPA's policy regarding the recovery of
  indirect costs in CERCLA cost recovery  actions, stating that
  the decision whether to seek indirect costs in existing cases
  will be made by the Regions after consultation with the De-
  partment of Justice and with the concurrence of EPA's Office
  of Enforcement Compliance and Monitoring and  Office of
  Waste Programs Enforcement.
  Specifications: 7p.
  Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
  Hazardous materials, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
  Response.
 0586  Policy Towards Owners of Residential Property at
  Superfund Sites
  Order Number PB91-205476CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Emergency and Remedial Response; 3 Jul 91
  The directive sets forth The Agency's enforcement policy to-
  wards owners of residential  property located  on a Superfund
  Site. Under this policy the Agency, in the exercise of enforce-
   ment discretion will  not pursue owners of residential property
  for performance  of  a  response  action or payment of re-
   sponse costs. This policy does not apply where the  owners'
   activities lead to a release or threat of release of hazardous
   substances,  resulting in the taking of a response action at
   the site. This policy does not apply where the owner fails to
   cooperate with the Agency's response action, fails to cooper-
  ate with institutional controls places on the property, fails to
 .meet other CERCLA obligations, or uses the residential prop-
  erty inconsistent with residential use.
  Specifications: 10p.
  Subject  index keywords: Superfund,  Waste management,
  Hazardous materials, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
  Response.
0587  Policy Towards Owners of Residential Property at
  Superfund Sites
  Order Number PB92-963615CDH, price: PC A01/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Waste Programs Enforcement; 1992
  The  document summarizes the  US  EPA  policy towards
  owners of residential property at Superfund Sites. The policy
  addresses concerns raised by owners of residential property
  located on Superfund sites and provides Regions with a na-
  tionally consistent approach on the issue. The guidance sets
  forth in writing what has been the Agency's past practice to-
  wards owners of residential property located on Superfund
  sites.
  Specifications:  Available  on  Standing Order,  deposit ac-
  count required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada, and
  Mexico;  all others  $400).  Single copies  also  available  in
  paper copy or microfiche. See also PB91-205476. 4p.
  Subject  index  keywords:  Hazardous materials,  Property
  owners,  Residential buildings, Government policies.

0588   Preparation of Hazardous Waste Referrals
  Order Number PB91-139543CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 30 Jul 85
  The directive discusses experience with the implementation
  of the Case Management Handbook. It indicates that filing by
  the Department of Justice has been delayed in  some cases
  by specific problems (as listed in the directive).
  Specifications: 8p.
  Subject  index keywords:  Superfund, Waste management,
  Hazardous materials, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
  Response.
0589  Procedural Guidance on Treatment of Insurers
  under CERCLA
  Order Number PB91-139188CDH, price: PC A05/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 21 Nov 85
  The report provides EPA Regional offices with the appropri-
  ate procedures to follow in issuing notice letters, developing
  referrals, and tracking CERCLA enforcement cases that may
  include insurers as third-party defendants.
  Specifications: 76p.
  Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste dis-
  posal, Law enforcement, Case studies.
 0590  Procedures for Documenting Costs for CERCLA
  Section 107 Actions
  Order Number PB91-138958CDH, price: PC A06/MF A01
   Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 30 Jan 85
  The  directive sets  forth  the procedures  for  documenting
   costs for CERCLA section  107 cost recovery actions.  These
   procedures  require the close cooperation and coordination
   among  Headquarters and Regional program, legal, and finan-

-------
                                                                    PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Enforcement
   cial offices. The procedures manual should be used in con-
   junction with the Case  Development Handbook. The  guid-
   ance supplements directive no. 9832.0, and replaces direc-
   tive no. 9832.4  by  number  only;  the document  has not
   changed.
   Specifications:  See also PB91 -138941. 125p.
   Subject index keywords: Superfund,  Waste management,
   Hazardous materials, Office of Solid Waste and Emerqencv
   Response.

 0591  Procedures for Transmittal of CERCLA and RCRA
   Civil Judicial Enforcement Case Packages to
   Headquarters
   Order Number PB91-139774CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
   Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
   Solid Waste and Emergency Response;  12 Jun 89
   The directive clarifies which CERCLA and RCRA referral and
   settlement  documents are to be sent to whom at Headquar-
   ters. The directive supplements directive no. 9891.1 'Expand-
   ed Civil Judicial Referral Procedures,' dated August 28, 1986.
   Specifications: See  also PB91-139766. 6p.
   Subject index  keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
   Hazardous  materials,  Office of Solid Waste and Emerqencv
   Response.

 0592  PRP Search Supplemental Guidance  for Sites in the
   Superfund Remedial Program
   Order Number PB91-139162CDH, price:  PC  A03/MF A01
   Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
   Emergency and Remedial Response; 16 Jun 89
   The  purpose of the document  is to provide guidance on po-
   tentially responsible parties (PRP) search planning and man-
   agement and on  the content  of PRP  search reports.  The
   guidance applies to sites in the remedial program and it  sup-
   plements the August, 1987 PRP Search Manual.
   Specifications:  38p.
   Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
   Hazardous  materials,  Office of Solid Waste and  Emerqencv
   Response.

 0593  Redelegation of Civil Judicial Settlement Authorities
   under Delegation 14-13-B and 14-14-E
   Order Number PB91-138834CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
   Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
   Emergency  and Remedial Response; 18 Aug 88
  The document  is composed of redelegations and consulta-
  tion on judicial settlements and  de minimis settlements to Di-
  rector of the Office of Waste Programs, from AA/OSWER.
  Specifications:  9p.
  Subject  index keywords: Refuse disposal,  Penalties, Office
  of  Solid  Waste and Emergency  Response, Comprehensive
  Environment Response Compensation and Liability Act.
0594  Releasing Identities of Potentially Responsible
  Parties in Response to FOIA Requests
  Order Number PB91-139147CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 26 Jan 84
  The directive provides  EPA policy on responding to requests
  under the Freedom of  Information Act (FOIA) for the  names
  of potentially responsible  parties  at CERCLA sites, and  ex-
  plains exceptions. The  guidance states that in response to a
  FOIA request, EPA will release the names of PRPs who have
  received  notice letters about CERCLA sites.
   Specifications: 7p.
   Subject index keywords: Superfund,  Hazardous materials,
   Waste management, Office of Solid Waste and  Emergency
   Response.

 0595  Releasing Information to Potentially Responsible
   Parties at CERCLA Sites
   Order Number PB91-139469CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
   Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
   Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 1 Mar 90
   The  directive presents Agency policy on releasing informa-
   tion,  for the purpose of facilitating settlement, to potentially
   responsible parties (PRP) at sites addressed under CERCLA.
   The directive partially supersedes directive no. 9835.0 'Inter-
   im CERCLA Settlement Policy' and supplements directive no.
   9834.0 'Releasing Identities of PRPs in Response to Free-
   dom  of Information Act Requests' and directive no. 9834.10
   'Interim Guidance on Notice Letters, Negotiations and Infor-
   mation Exchange,' dated October 19, 1987.
   Specifications:  9p.
   Subject index  keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
   Hazardous materials, Off ice-of Solid Waste  and Emergency
   Response.

 0596  Report to Congress: Settlements with Municipal
   Waste Generators and Transporters Since 1991 under
   the Comprehensive Environmental Response,
   Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980
   Order Number PB93-963604CDH, price:  PC A02/MF A01
   Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
   Solid  Waste and Emergency Response; 12 Mar 93
   The report to Congress summarizes the status of completed
   settlements and ongoing negotiations with municipal genera-
   tors and transporters of municipal solid waste and municipal
   sewage sludge under the Comprehensive Environmental Re-
   sponse, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980 since 1991.
   Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
   posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
   and Mexico; all others $400).  Single copies also available in
   paper copy or microfiche. 9p.
   Subject index keywords: Municipal wastes,  Hazardous ma-
   terials transportation, Waste management, Sewage sludge,
   Superfund, Settlements.

0597 Revised EPA Guidance on Parallel Proceedings
   Order Number PB91-139667CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
   Environmental Protection  Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
   Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 21 Jun 89
   The directive provides guidance on simultaneous  pursuit of
   criminal prosecutions and civil, judicial, or Agency administra-
   tive actions.
  Specifications:  Portions of this document are not fully legi-
   ble. 27p.
  Subject index keywords: Waste management, Superfund,
  Hazardous materials, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
  Response.

0598  Revised Hazardous Waste Bankruptcy Guidance
  Order  Number PB91-139022CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC.  Office of
  Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 23 May 86
  The directive  supplements the  May 24, 1984,  guidance
  'CERCLA Enforcement Against Bankrupt  Parties' and  the
                                                                                                             99

-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Enforcement
  guidelines  on bankruptcy contained in the Cost Recovery
  Handbook 'Procedures for Documenting Costs for CERCLA
  Section 107 Actions,' directive no. 9832.7, dated January 30,
  1985. The memorandum defines specific criteria for evaluat-
  ing the merits of a potential bankruptcy referral  and elabo-
  rates  on the policy regarding settlement with bankrupt par-
  ties.  It reviews the recent judicial decisions in the areas of
  the automatic stay, abandonment, discharge, and claims of
  administrative expenses, and briefly describes the new en-
  forcement theories that have been asserted by the Agency in
  recent pleadings.
  Specifications:  See also PB91-139014. 28p.
  Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
  Hazardous materials,  Office of Solid Waste and  Emergency
  Response.
0599   Revised Hazardous Waste Bankruptcy Guidance,
  October 7,1991
  Order Number PB92-105485CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
  Corvallis Environmental  Research Lab., OR; 7 Oct 91
  The  Agency's recent experience in  CERCLA  and RCRA
  bankruptcy actions has identified the need for updated and
  revised guidance on the scope of EPA's enforcement actions
  against bankrupt parties. The directive is intended to update
  the May 24, 1984 guidance 'CERCLA  Enforcement  Against
  Bankrupt Parties' and the guidelines on bankruptcy contained
  in the Cost Recovery Handbook 'Procedures for  Document-
  ing Costs for CERCLA Section  107  Actions,' January 30,
  1985. The memorandum defines specific criteria for evaluat-
  ing the  merits of a potential bankruptcy referral; elaborates
  on the policy regarding settlement with bankrupt  parties; re-
  views the recent judicial decisions in the areas of the  auto-
  matic stay, abandonment, discharge, and claims of adminis-
  trative expenses; and briefly describes how new enforcement
  theories which have been asserted by  the Agency in recent
  pleadings.
  Specifications:  Supersedes PB91-139022. 25p.
  Subject index  keywords: Superfund,  Waste management,
  Hazardous materials, Office of Solid Waste and  Emergency
  Response.
 0600   Revised Policy on Discretionary Information
  Release under CERCLA
  Order Number PB93-963610CDH, price: PC A01/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 31 Mar 93
  The  memorandum revises  OSWER  Directive 9835.12, Re-
  leasing Information  to  Potentially Responsible Parties  of
  CERCLA  Sites, with the intention of streamlining and expedit-
  ing the CERCLA settlement process.
  Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
   posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S.,  Canada,
   and Mexico; all others  $400). Single copies also  available in
   paper copy or microfiche. See also PB91-139469. 3p.
   Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
   Potentially responsible parties.
 0601   Revised Procedures for Implementing Off-Site
   Response Actions
   Order Number PB91-139287CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
   Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
   Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 13 Nov 87
   The directive describes procedures that should  be observed
   when a response action under CERCLA or section 7003 of
  RCRA involves the off-site treatment, storage, or disposal of
  CERCLA  waste.  The  directive  supersedes directive  no.
  9300.2-5 'Procedures for Planning and Implementing Off-site
  Response Actions,' directive no. 9330.2-6 'Eligibility of Facili-
  ties in Assessment Monitoring,' and directive no.  9830.2-1
  'Procedures for Planning and Implementing  Off-site  Re-
  sponse Actions under CERCLA,' dated May 6, 1985.
  Specifications: 25p.
  Subject  index keywords: Superfund,  Waste management,
  Hazardous materials, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
  Response.
0602  Revision of CERCLA Civil Judicial Settlement
  Authorities under Delegations 14-13-B and 14-14-E
  Order Number PB91-138818CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Emergency and Remedial Response; 17 Jun 88
  The directive  implements  revisions to  the consultation and
  concurrence requirements of the civil judicial settlement dele-
  gations,  which are designed to streamline the  enforcement
  process  and help achieve Agency remedial  action and  cost
  recovery goals. These revisions expand Regional authority to
  approve CERCLA  settlements. The directive supplements  a
  portion of directive No. 9012.10 'Redelegation of Authority
  Under CERCLA and SARA,' dated May 25, 1988.
  Specifications: 8p.
  Subject index keywords: Refuse disposal, Penalties, Office
  of Solid Waste and Emergency  Response,  Comprehensive
  Environment Response Compensation and Liability Act.

0603  Revisions to the Interim Guidance on PRP
  Participation in Remedial Investigations and Feasibility
  Studies
  Order Number PB91-139352CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 7 Feb 89
  The directive sets forth  policies and procedures governing
  potentially responsible party participation  in  the remedial in-
  vestigations and feasibility studies process, including initiation
  of PRP searches, PRP notification, development  of agree-
  ments and oversight of RI/FS activities. The directive super-
  sedes directive no. 9835.1 'Participation of PRPs in Develop-
  ment of RIs and  FSs under CERCLA'  and  directive no.
  9355.3-01 'Guidance on RI/FS.'
  Specifications: Portions of this document are  not fully legi-
  ble. 42p.
  Subject  index keywords: Superfund,  Waste management,
  Hazardous materials, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
  Response.
 0604  Roles and Responsibilities of Regional Project
  Officers and Headquarters Zone Project Officers for
  Management of TES (TIES 50) Contracts
  Order Number PB91-139758CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 3 Mar 89
  The directive defines the roles and responsibilities of Region-
  al Project Officers (RPO) and  Headquarters  Zone Project Of-
  ficers (ZPO)  managing and administering the Technical En-
  forcement Support (TES) Contracts, six of which were award-
   ed in the second quarter, FY89. These contracts are referred
  to collectively as TES 5—. The directive no. 9871.0, dated
   February 17, 1989, which describes duties and  responsibil-
 100

-------
                                                                     PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Enforcement
   ities of Regional Project Officers and Work Assignment Man-
   agers  under TES 3 and 4 remains in effect with respect to
   those contracts.
   Specifications:  See also PB91-139741. 26p.
   Subject  index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
   Hazardous materials, Office of Solid Waste  and Emergency
   Response.

 0605  Scope of the CERCLA Petroleum Exclusion under
   Sections 101(14) and 104(a)(2)
   Order Number PB91-139550CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
   Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
   Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 31 Jul 87
   The directive discusses whether contaminants in used oil or
   any other petroleum substances are within the petroleum  ex-
   clusion.
   Specifications:  15p.
   Subject  index  keywords: Superfund,  Waste management
   Hazardous materials, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
   Response.

 0606  Site Classification Changes from Enforcement to
   Fund Lead
   Order Number PB91-139600CDH,  price: PC A02/MF A01
   Environmental Protection Agency,  Washington, DC. Office  of
   Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 5 May 87
   The directive explains to the Regions the circumstances and
   procedures to follow for changing National Priorities List site
  classification from enforcement to Fund Lead. The directive
  supplements  directive no. 9200.3-1  'FY 1987 Superfund
  SCAP Manual,' dated September 30, 1987.
  Specifications: 7p.
  Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
  Hazardous materials, Office of Solid Waste  and Emergency
  Response.

0607  Site  Enforcement Tracking System  (SETS):
  Frequency by Party Name Report
  Order Number PB90-242868CDH, price: PC A06/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Waste Programs Enforcement; 2 Aug 90
  When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
  hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and  Liabil-
  ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to  identify  parties
  with potential  financial responsibility for remediation  of un-
  controlled  hazardous waste  sites. EPA regional Superfund
  Waste Management Staff issue a  notice letter to the poten-
  tially responsible party (PRP). Data from this  notice letter is
  used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
  The data  includes PRP name and address, a company con-
  tact person, the  date the notice was issued, and the related
  CERCLA  site  name and identification number. SETS was
  created to track PRP identification  at both  NPL (National Pri-
  ority List)  and non-NPL sites.  SETS does not address the
  range of other administrative duties related  to tracking the
  PRP. These lists (updated quarterly) represent EPA's prelimi-
  nary findings on the identities of potentially responsible par-
  ties. Inclusion on these lists does not constitute a final deter-
  mination concerning the liability  of any party for the hazard  or
  contamination  at any CERCLA  site. The frequency  listing  is
  arranged in the following manner.  The number of sites  asso-
  ciated with the party is indicated in  the site's column. The
  first two characters of the site ID number constitute the state
  abbreviation of the site location.
   Specifications:  119p.
   Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste dis-
   posal, Coordinated procurement, Site Enforcement Tracking
   System, Superfund, Remedial action.

 0608  Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
   Frequency by Party Name Report
   Order Number PB91-130518CDH, price: PC A06/MF A01
   Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
   Waste Programs Enforcement; 19 Dec 90
   When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
   hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
   ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search  to identify parties
   with potential financial  responsibility for remediation of un-
   controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
   Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
   tially responsible party (PRP). Data from this notice letter is
   used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
   This data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
   tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
   CERCLA site name  and  identification  number. SETS was
   created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
   ority List)  and non-NPL sites. SETS does not address the
   range of other administrative duties  related to tracking the
   PRP.
  Specifications: Supersedes PB90-242868. 123p.
  Subject index keywords:  Hazardous materials, Waste dis-
  posal, Coordinated procurement, Directories, Site  Enforce-
  ment  Tracking System,  Superfund, Remedial action, Poten-
  tially responsible parties.

0609  Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
  Frequency by Party Name Report
  Order Number PB91-170423CDH, price: PC A07/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Waste Programs Enforcement; 5 Apr 91
  When  expending  Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
  hensive  Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
  ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
  with potential  financial responsibility for  remediation of un-
  controlled  hazardous  waste sites.  EPA regional Superfund
  Waste Management Staff issued a notice letter to the poten-
  tially responsible party (PRP). Data from  this notice letter is
  used to form the Site  Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
  This data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
  tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
  CERCLA site  name  and identification number.  SETS was
  created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
  ority List) and non-NPL  sites. SETS  does  not address the
  range  of other administrative duties related to tracking the
  PRP.  The  frequency  listing is  arranged  in  the following
  manner. The number of sites associated with the party is in-
  dicated in the  site's column. The first two characters of the
  site ID number constitute the state abbreviation  of  the site
  location.
  Specifications: Supersedes PB91-130518.  142p.
  Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials,  Waste dis-
  posal,  Superfund, Notification procedures,  Directories, Site
  Enforcement Tracking System, Potentially  responsible par-
  ties.
                                                                                                              101

-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Enforcement
0610  Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
  Frequency by PRP Name Report, September 26, 1991
  Order Number PB92-105345CDH, price: PC A08
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Waste Programs Enforcement; 26 Sep 91
  When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
  hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
  ity Act)  site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
  with potential financial  responsibility for remediation of un-
  controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
  Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
  tially responsible party (PRP). Data from the notice letter  is
  used to form  the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
  The data includes PRP name  and address, a company con-
  tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
  CERCLA site name  and identification number. SETS  was
  created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
  ority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS does  not  address the
  range of other administrtive duties related  to  tracking the
  PRP.  The  frequency listing  is arranged  in the following
  manner. The  number of sites associated with the party is in-
  dicated  in the site's column. The first two characters of the
  site ID  number constitute the state abbreviation of the site
  location,
  Specifications: Supersedes PB91-215186. 170p.
  Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste disposal, Direc-
  tories,  Hazardous  materials,  Site  Enforcement  Tracking
  System, Potentially responsible parties, US EPA Regions  1-
  10.
 0611  Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS) (National)
  Order Number PB90-591790CDH, price: Subscription, call for
  price
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Waste Programs Enforcement; 31 Jul 90
  When expending  Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
  hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
  ity Act) site,  EPA must  conduct a search to identify parties
  with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
  controlled  hazardous waste sites.  EPA  regional  Superfund
  Waste  Management  Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
  tially  responsible  party (PRP). Data from this notice letter is
  used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
  This data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
  tact person,  the date the notice was issued, and the related
  CERCLA site name and  identification  number. SETS was
  created by EPA to track PRP identification  at both NPL (Na-
  tional Priority List) and  non-NPL sites. SETS does not ad-
  dress the range of other administrative duties  related  to
  tracking the  PRP. These lists represent EPA's preliminary
  findings on the  identities of PRPs. Inclusion on  these lists
  does not constitute  a final determination concerning the li-
  ability of any party for  the hazard or contamination at any
  CERCLA site.
  Specifications:  Available in 9-track EBCDIC character set,
   1600  bpi. Available on  subscription,  U.S.,  Canada and
   Mexico price $880.00/year; all others  $1760.00/year. Also
   available on demand as PB90-591791, price T02 for either
   1600 or 6250 bpi. Issued quarterly. System: IBM  3090; ESA
   3.1.3 operating system. For system on diskette,  see PB90-
   591780.
  Subject index keywords: Data file,  Hazardous materials,
  Superfund, Remedial action, Regional  analysis, Waste man-
  agement.
0612  Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): National
  Alphabetical Report by PRP Name, September 26, 1991
  Order Number PB92-105360CDH, price: Call for price
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Waste Programs Enforcement; 26 Sep  91
  When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
  hensive Environmental Response, Compensation  and Liabil-
  ity Act)  site, EPA must  conduct a  search to identify parties
  with  potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
  controlled  hazardous waste sites.  EPA regional  Superfund
  Waste Management Staff  issue a notice letter to  the poten-
  tially responsible party (PRP). Data from the notice letter is
  used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
  The data includes PRP  name and address, a company con-
  tact person, the date the notice was issued,  and the related
  CERCLA site name  and  identification number. SETS was
  created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
  ority List)  and non-NPL sites. SETS  does not address the
  range of other administrative duties related  to tracking the
  PRP.
  Specifications: Supersedes PB91-215160. 3746p.
  Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials,  Waste dis-
  posal, Superfund, Remedial action, Directories, Potentially re-
  sponsible parties, Site Enforcement Tracking System.

 0613  Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS) (National)
  (for Microcomputers)
  Order Number PB90-591780CDH, price: Subscription, call for
  price
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Waste Programs Enforcement; 31  Jul 90
  When expending  Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
  hensive Environmental  Response,  Compensation and Liabil-
  ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search  to identify parties
  with potential financial  responsibility  for remediation of un-
  controlled  hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
  Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poteh-
  tially  responsible  party  (PRP). Data from this notice letter is
  used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking  System (SETS).
  This data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
  tact person, the date the  notice was issued, and the related
  CERCLA  site name and  identification  number.  SETS was
  created by EPA  to track PRP identification at both NPL (Na-
  tional Priority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS  does not ad-
  dress the  range of other administrative  duties related  to
  tracking the  PRP. These lists represent  EPA's preliminary
  findings on the  identities  of PRPs. Inclusion on these lists
  does not constitute a final determination  concerning the li-
  ability of any party for the hazard or contamination at any
  CERCLA site.
  Specifications:  The datafile is contained on twelve 1.2M, 5
   1 /4 inch diskettes, high density. File format:  ASCII. Available
   on subscription,  U.S.,  Canada and  Mexico price  $920.00/
  year;  price for  others $1840.00/year.  Also available on
   demand as PB90-591781  for DOS. Issued quarterly. System:
   IBM  PC/AT;  MS DOS  3.3  operating system,  640K. For
   system on magnetic tape, see PB90-591790. 12 diskettes.
 102

-------
                                                                     PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Enforcement
   Subject index keywords: Data file,  Hazardous materials,
   Superfund, Remedial action, Regional  analysis, Waste man-
   agement.

 0614  Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): National
   Frequency by PRP Name Report
   Order Number PB92-173103CDH, price:
   Environmental Protection Agency, Washington,  DC. Office of
   Waste Programs Enforcement; Apr 92
   When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
   hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
   ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search  to identify parties
   with potential financial  responsibility for remediation of un-
   controlled hazardous waste  sites. EPA regional Superfund
   Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter  to the poten-
 ,  tially responsible party (PRP). Data from the notice  letter is
   used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System  (SETS).
   The data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
   tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
   CERCLA site name  and  identification  number.  SETS was
   created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
   orities List) and non-NPL sites. SETS does not address the
   range of other administrative duties  related to tracking the
   PRP. These lists (updated quarterly) represent EPA's prelimi-
   nary findings on the identities of potentially responsible par-
   ties. The site  report is designed to provide PRP information
   linked by the associated site,  which appears according to the
  state where the site is located.
  Specifications: Supersedes PB92-139526. 184p.
  Subject index keywords:  Superfund,  Hazardous materials,
 . Waste disposal, Coordinated  procurement, Remedial action,
  Directories, Site  Enforcement Tracking System, Potentially
  responsible parties.

0615  Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): National
  PRP Listing Alphabetically by PRP Name
  Order Number PB92-173095CDH, price: Call for price
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Waste Programs Enforcement; Apr 92
  When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
  hensive  Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
  ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
  with potential  financial responsibility for remediation of  un-
,  controlled  hazardous waste sites.  EPA regional Superfund
  Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
  tially responsible  party (PRP). Data from the notice letter is
  used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
  The data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
  tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the  related
  CERCLA  site  name and identification  number. SETS was
  created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
  orities  List) and non-NPL sites. SETS does not address the
  range of other administrative duties related to  tracking the
  PRP. These lists (updated quarterly) represent EPA's prelimi-
  nary findings on the identities of potentially responsible par-
  ties. The site report is designed to provide PRP information
  linked by the associated site, which appears according to the
  state where the site is located.
  Specifications: Supersedes PB92-139518. 4770p.
  Subject  index keywords: Superfund,  Hazardous materials,
 Waste disposal, Coordinated procurement, Remedial  action,
  Directories, Site Enforcement Tracking System,  Potentially
 responsible parties.
 0616  Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): National
   PRP Listing Alphabetically by PRP Name
   Order Number PB92-220136CDH, price: Call for price
   Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
   Waste Programs Enforcement; Jul 92
   When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
   hensive  Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
   ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
   with potential  financial responsibility for remediation of un-
   controlled hazardous waste sites.  EPA regional Superfund
   Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
   tially responsible party (PRP).  Data from the notice letter is
   used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
   The data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
   tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
   CERCLA site  name and identification  number. SETS was
 .  created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
   ority List) and non-NPL sites.
   Specifications: Supersedes PB92-173095. 5158p.
   Subject  index keywords: Hazardous  materials, Financial
   management, Law enforcement, Tracking, Superfund, Reme-
   dial Action.

 0617  Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): National
   PRP Listing by Site
   Order  Number PB92-173087CDH, price: Call for price
   Environmental  Protection Agency,  Washington, DC. Office of
   Waste Programs Enforcement; Apr 92
   When  expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
   hensive Environmental  Response, Compensation and Liabil-
   ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify  parties
   with potential financial responsibility for remediation  of un-
   controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
   Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
   tially responsible party (PRP).  Data from the notice letter is
   used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
   The data includes PRP name and address, a company  con-
   tact person, the date the  notice was issued, and the related
   CERCLA  site name and  identification number.  SETS  was
   created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
   orities  List) and non-NPL  sites. SETS does not  address the
   range  of  other administrative duties related to  tracking the
   PRP. These lists (updated quarterly) represent EPA's prelimi-
   nary findings on the identities of potentially responsible par-
   ties. The  site report is designed to provide PRP information
   linked by  the associated site, which appears according to the
  state where-the site is located.
  Specifications:  Supersedes PB92-139500. 5215p.
  Subject index keywords: Superfund, Hazardous materials,
  Waste  disposal, Coordinated procurement, Remedial action,
  Directories, Site  Enforcement  Tracking  System, Potentially
  responsible parties.

0618  Site  Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): National
  PRP Listing by Site
  Order Number PB92-220128CDH, price: Call for price
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Waste Programs Enforcement; Jul 92
  When expending Superfund  monies  at a CERCLA (Compre-
  hensive Environmental Response,  Compensation and  Liabil-
  ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
  with potential financial responsibility  for  remediation of un-
  controlled  hazardous waste sites.  EPA  regional Superfund
                                                                                                              103

-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Enforcement
  Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
  tially responsible party (PRP).  Data from the notice  letter is
  used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System  (SETS).
  The data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
  tact person, the date the notice was  issued,  and the related
  CERCLA site name  and identification number.  SETS was
  created to track PRP identification at  both NPL (National Pri-
  orities List) and non-NPL sites. SETS does not address the
  range of other administrative  duties  related  to  tracking the
  PRP. The listing by site name is organized  in the following
  manner. Sites are sorted by state, as indicated in the site ID
  number. The first two characters of the site  ID number con-
  stitute the state abbreviation of the site location. The listing
  by party name is arranged alphabetically by the  name of the
  party and provides a company contact and  address. Within
  each record,  the sites associated with the  PRP are listed.
  The first two characters of the site ID number constitute the
  state abbreviation of the site location.
  Specifications:  Supersedes PB92-173087. 5611 p.
  Subject  index  keywords: Superfund,   Remedial  action,
  Waste  disposal,  Directories, Hazardous materials,  Site En-
  forcement Tracking System, Potentially responsible parties.

0619 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): National
  PRP Report by Site, September 26,1991
  Order Number PB92-105352CDH, price: Call for price
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Waste Programs Enforcement; 26 Sep 91
  When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
  hensive Environmental Response,  Compensation and Liabil-
  ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search  to identify parties
  with potential financial responsibility for remediation of  un-
  controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
  Waste  Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
  tially responsible party (PRP). Data from the notice letter is
  used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking  System (SETS).
  The data includes PRP name  and address, a company con-
  tact person, the  date the notice was issued, and the related
  CERCLA  site  name and identification number. SETS was
  created to track  PRP identification at both  NPL (National  Pri-
  ority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS does not address  the
  range of other administrative  duties related to tracking  the
  PRP. The site report is designed to provide  PRP information
  linked by the associated site, which appears  according to the
  state where the site is located.
  Specifications:  Supersedes PB91-215178. 3027p.
  Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste disposal, Direc-
  tories,  Hazardous  materials,  Site  Enforcement  Tracking
  System,  Potentially  responsible parties, US  EPA Regions 1-
  10.
0620  Site Enforcement Tracking System  (SETS) (National
  - 3 1/2 Inch Diskette, IBM PS/2 Compatible) (for
  Microcomputers)
  Order Number PB92-592130CDH, price: Subscription, call for
  price
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Waste Programs Enforcement; Oct 91
  When expending Superfund monies  at a CERCLA  (Compre-
  hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and  Liabil-
  ity Act) site,  EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
  with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
  controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
  Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
  tially responsible party (PRP). Data from the notice letter is
  used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
  The data includes  PRP name and address, a company con-
  tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
  CERCLA site name and  identification  number. SETS was
  created by EPA to track PRP identification at both NPL (Na-
  tional  Priority List) and  non-NPL sites.  SETS does not ad-
  dress  the  range  of other administrative duties related to
  tracking  the  PRP. These lists represent EPA's preliminary
  findings  on the identities  of PRPs. Inclusion on these lists
  does not constitute  a final determination concerning the li-
  ability  of any party for the hazard or contamination at any
  CERCLA site.
  Specifications: Available on subscription, U.S., Canada, and
  Mexico price $1,000; price for others $2,000. Issued quarter-
  ly. The datafile is  on ten, 3 1/2 inch diskettes, 1.44M high
  density.  File  format: ASCII. Also available individually; order
  number  PB92-592131, price  DOS. System: IBM PS/2; MS
  DOS 3.3 operating system, 640K. Other formats available as
  IBM (or  compatible) 5 1/4 inch - PB90-591780. 10 diskettes.
  Subject index keywords: Data file, Hazardous materials,
  Waste disposal, Superfund, Remedial  action, Directories, Site
  Enforcement Tracking System, Potentially responsible  par-
  ties.

0621  Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
  Listing by Site for Alabama
  Order Number PB90-243056CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Waste Programs Enforcement; 2 Aug 90
  When expending  Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
  hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
  ity Act)  site, EPA  must conduct a search to identify parties
  with potential financial  responsibility  for remediation of un-
  controlled  hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
  Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
  tially responsible  party (PRP).  Data from this notice letter is
  used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
  The data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
  tact person,  the date the notice  was  issued, and the related
  CERCLA site  name and identification  number. SETS was
  created  to track PRP identification at  both NPL (National Pri-
  ority  List)  and non-NPL sites. SETS does  not address the
  range of other administrative  duties  related to tracking the
  PRP.  These lists (updated quarterly) represent EPA's prelimi-
  nary findings on the identities of potentially responsible par-
  ties. Inclusion on these lists does not constitute a final deter-
  mination concerning the liability of any party for the hazard or
  contamination at  any CERCLA  site.  The  site report is  de-
  signed to  provide PRP information linked by the associated
  site, which appears according to Alabama where the site is
  located.
  Specifications: Also available in set of 8 reports PC E99/
  MF E99, PB90-243049. See also PB90-243064. 12p.
  Subject index keywords: Hazardous  materials,  Alabama,
  Waste disposal,  Coordinated  procurement, Directories, Site
  Enforcement Tracking System, Superfund,  Remedial action.
 104

-------
                                                                    PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION; Enforcement
0622  Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
  Listing by Site for Alabama
  Order Number PB91-130708CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Waste Programs Enforcement; 19 Dec 90
  When expending  Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
  hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and  Liabil-
  ity Act) site, EPA  must  conduct a  search to identify parties
  with potential financial responsibility  for remediation of un-
  controlled hazardous waste sites.  EPA regional  Superfund
  Waste Management  Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
  tially responsible party (PRP) for the state of Alabama. Data
  from this notice letter is used to form the Site Enforcement
  Tracking  System (SETS). This data includes PRP  name and
  address, a company  contact person, the date the notice was
  issued, and the related CERCLA site name and identification
  number. SETS was  created  to track PRP identification  at
  both NPL (National  Priority List) and non-NPL sites.  SETS
  does not address the range of other administrative duties re-
  lated to tracking the PRP.
  Specifications: Also available in set of 8  reports PC E99/
  MF E99,  PB91-130690.  Supersedes PB90-243056. See also
  PB91-131219. 11p.
  Subject index keywords: Hazardous  materials, Alabama,
  Waste disposal, Coordinated  procurement, Directories, Site
  Enforcement Tracking System, Superfund,  Remedial action,
  Potentially responsible parties.

0623  Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
  Listing by Site for Alabama
  Order  Number PB91-170613CDH, price: PC A03/MF  A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Waste Programs Enforcement; 5 Apr 91
  When  expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
  hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and  Liabil-
  ity Act) site, EPA  must conduct a  search to  identify parties
  with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
  controlled hazardous waste sites.  EPA regional Superfund
  Waste Management Staff issued a notice letter to the poten-
  tially responsible party (PRP). Data from this notice  letter is
  used to form the Site Enforcement  Tracking System  (SETS).
  This data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
  tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
  CERCLA  site name  and identification  number. SETS was
  created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
  ority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS  does not address the
  range  of  other  administrative duties related to tracking the
  PRP. The site report is designed to provide PRP information
  linked  by the associated  site, which  appears according to the
  state where the site is located.
  Specifications: Also available in set  of 8 reports PC E99/
  MF E99, PB91-170605. Supersedes PB91-130708. See also
  PB91-170621. 13p.
  Subject index  keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste dis-
  posal,  Superfund,  Notification procedures,  Directories, Ala-
  bama,  Site Enforcement Tracking System, Potentially respon-
  sible parties.
0624  Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
  Listing by Site for American Samoa
 .Order Number PB90-243395CDH, price: PC A01/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Waste Programs Enforcement; 2 Aug 90
  When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
  hensive  Environmental Response, Compensation and  Liabil-
  ity Act) site, EPA  must conduct a  search to identify parties
  with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
  controlled hazardous waste sites.  EPA  regional  Superfund
  Waste Management  Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
  tially responsible party (PRP). Data from this notice letter is
  used to form the Site Enforcement  Tracking System (SETS).
  The data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
  tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
  CERCLA site name  and identification  number. SETS was
  created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
  ority List) and  non-NPL sites. SETS  does not address the
  range of other administrative duties related to tracking the
  PRP. These lists (updated quarterly) represent EPA's prelimi-
  nary findings on the  identities of potentially responsible par-
  ties. Inclusion on these lists does not constitute a final  deter-
  mination concerning the liability of any party for the hazard or
  contamination at any CERCLA site. The site report  is de-
  signed to provide  PRP information  linked by the associated
  site, which appears according to American Samoa where the
  site is located.
  Specifications: Also  available in set of  6 reports PC E99/
  MF E99, PB90-243387. See also PB90-243403. 5p.
  Subject: index keywords: Hazardous  materials, American
  Samoa,  Waste disposal, Coordinated procurement,  Directo-
  ries, Site Enforcement Tracking System, Superfund, Remedi-
  al action.

0625  Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
  Listing by Site for American Samoa
  Order  Number PB91-131086CDH, price: PC A01/MF  A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Waste Programs Enforcement; 19 Dec 90
  When  expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
  hensive  Environmental Response, Compensation and  Liabil-
  ity Act) site,  EPA  must conduct a  search to identify parties
  with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
  controlled hazardous waste sites.  EPA  regional  Superfund
  Waste Management  Staff issue a notice  letter to the poten-
  tially responsible party (PRP) for American Samoa. Data from
  this notice letter is used to form the Site Enforcement Track-
  ing System (SETS).  This data includes PRP name  and ad-
  dress, a company contact person,  the date the notice was
  issued, and the related CERCLA site name and identification
  number.  SETS was  created to track  PRP  identification  at
  both NPL (National  Priority List) and non-NPL sites.  SETS
  does not address the range of other administrative duties re-
  lated to tracking the PRP.
  Specifications: Also  available in set  of  6 reports PC E99/
  MF E99, PB91-131078. Supersedes PB90-243395. See also
  PB91-131094. 4p.
  Subject  index  keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste dis-
  posal,  Coordinated procurement, Directories,  Site Enforce-
  ment Tracking System, Superfund,  Remedial action, Poten-
  tially responsible parties.
                                                                                                              105

-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Enforcement
0626  Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
  Listing by Site for American Samoa
  Order Number PB91-170951CDH, price: PC A01/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Waste Programs Enforcement; 5 Apr 91
  When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
  hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
  ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
  with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
  controlled hazardous waste sites.  EPA regional Superfund
  Waste Management Staff issued a notice letter to the poten-
  tially responsible party (PRP). Data from this notice letter is
  used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
  This data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
  tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
  CERCLA site name and identification number. SETS was
  created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
  ority List) and non-NPL  sites. SETS does not address the
  range  of other administrative duties related to tracking the
  PRP. The site report is designed to provide PRP information
  linked by the associated site, which appears according to the
  state where the site is located.
  Specifications:  Also  available in set of 6 reports PC E99/
  MF E99, PB91-170944. Supersedes PB91-131086. See also
  PB91-170969. 5p.
  Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste  dis-
  posal, Superfund, Notification procedures, Directories, Ameri-
  can Samoa, Site Enforcement Tracking System, Potentially
  responsible parties.
0627  Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
  Listing by Site for Arizona
  Order  Number PB90-243403CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Waste Programs Enforcement; 2 Aug 90
  When  expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
  hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
  ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
  with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
  controlled  hazardous waste sites.  EPA regional Superfund
  Waste Management  Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
  tially responsible party (PRP). Data from this notice letter is
  used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
  The data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
  tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
  CERCLA site name and identification number. SETS was
  created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
  ority List) and non-NPL  sites. SETS does not address the
  range  of other administrative duties related to tracking the
  PRP. These lists (updated quarterly)  represent EPA's prelimi-
  nary findings on the  identities of potentially responsible par-
  ties. Inclusion on these lists does not constitute a final deter-
  mination concerning the liability of any party for the hazard or
  contamination at any CERCLA site. The site report is de-
  signed to provide PRP information  linked by the associated
  site, which appears according to Arizona where the site is lo-
  cated.
  Specifications: Also available in set of 6 reports PC E99/
  MF E99, PB90-243387. See also PB90-243395 and  PB90-
  243411. 16p.
  Subject index  keywords: Hazardous  materials,  Arizona,
  Waste disposal, Coordinated procurement, Directories, Site
  Enforcement Tracking System, Superfund, Remedial action.
0628  Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
  Listing by Site for Arizona
  Order Number PB91-131094CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Waste Programs Enforcement; 19 Dec 90
  When expending  Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
  hensive  Environmental Response, Compensation  and  Liabil-
  ity Act) site, EPA  must  conduct a search to identify parties
  with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
  controlled hazardous waste sites.  EPA regional  Superfund
  Waste Management  Staff issue a notice letter to  the poten-
  tially responsible  party (PRP)  for the state of Arizona. Data
  from this notice letter is used to form the Site Enforcement
  Tracking  System  (SETS). This data includes PRP  name and
  address, a company  contact person, the date the notice was
  issued, and the related CERCLA site name and identification
  number.   SETS was  created  to track PRP identification  at
  both NPL (National  Priority List) and  non-NPL sites.  SETS
  does not address the range of other administrative duties re-
  lated to tracking the PRP.
  Specifications: Also available in set of 6  reports PC  E99/
  MF E99,  PB91-131078.  Supersedes PB90-243403. See also
  PB91-131086 and PB91-131102. 19p.
  Subject   index  keywords:  Hazardous  materials,  Arizona,
  Waste disposal, Coordinated  procurement,  Directories, Site
  Enforcement Tracking System, Superfund,  Remedial action,
  Potentially responsible parties.

0629  Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
  Listing by Site for Arizona
  Order Number PB91-170969CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Waste Programs Enforcement; 5 Apr 91
  When expending  Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
  hensive  Environmental Response, Compensation  and  Liabil-
  ity Act) site, EPA  must  conduct a search to identify parties
  with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
  controlled hazardous waste sites.  EPA regional  Superfund
  Waste Management  Staff issued a notice letter to  the poten-
  tially responsible  party (PRP). Data from this notice letter is
  used to form the  Site Enforcement  Tracking System (SETS).
  This data includes PRP  name and address, a company con-
  tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
  CERCLA site name  and identification  number. SETS was
  created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
  ority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS does not address the
  range of other administrative duties related to tracking the
  PRP. The site report is designed  to provide  PRP information
  linked by the associated site, which  appears according  to the
  state where the site is located.
  Specifications: Also available in set of 6  reports PC  E99/
  MF E99,  PB91-170944.  Supersedes PB91-131094. See also
  PB91-170951 and PB91-170977. 24p.
  Subject  index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste dis-
  posal, Superfund,  Notification  procedures, Directories,  Arizo-
  na,  Site  Enforcement Tracking System, Potentially responsi-
  ble parties.
106

-------
                                                                     PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Enforcement
 0630  Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
  Listing by Site for Arkansas
  Order Number PB90-243213CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Waste Programs Enforcement; 2 Aug 90
  When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
  hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and  Liabil-
  ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
  with potential  financial  responsibility for  remediation  of un-
  controlled hazardous waste  sites. EPA  regional Superfund
  Waste Management Staff issue a notice  letter to the poten-
  tially responsible party (PRP). Data from  this notice letter is
  used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
  The data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
  tact person,  the date the notice was issued, and the related
  CERCLA site  name  and identification number.  SETS was
  created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
  ority List)  and non-NPL  sites. SETS does  not address the
  range of other administrative duties  related to tracking the
  PRP. These  lists (updated quarterly) represent EPA's prelimi-
  nary findings on the identities of potentially responsible par-
  ties. Inclusion on these lists does not constitute a final deter-
  mination concerning the liability of any party for the hazard or
  contamination  at any CERCLA site.  The site report  is de-
  signed to provide PRP information linked by the associated
  site, which appears according to Arkansas where the site is
  located.
  Specifications: Also  available in  set of 5 reports PC  E99/
  MF E99, PB90-243205. See also PB90-243221. 16p.
  Subject index keywords: Hazardous  materials, Arkansas,
  Waste  disposal, Coordinated procurement,  Directories, Site
  Enforcement Tracking System, Superfund, Remedial action.

0631  Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
  Listing by Site for Arkansas
  Order Number  PB91-130906CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
  Environmental  Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Waste Programs Enforcement; 19 Dec 90
  When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
  hensive Environmental Response, Compensation  and  Liabil-
  ity Act) site,  EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
  with potential financial responsibility  for remediation of un-
  controlled  hazardous  waste sites. EPA  regional  Superfund
  Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the 'poten-
  tially responsible party (PRP) for the state of Arkansas. Data
  from this notice letter is used to form the Site Enforcement
  Tracking System (SETS). This data includes PRP name and
  address, a company contact person, the date the notice was
  issued, and the related CERCLA site name and identification
  number. SETS was created  to track PRP  identification at
  both NPL (National Priority List) and non-NPL sites.  SETS
  does not address the range of other administrative duties re-
  lated to tracking the PRP.
  Specifications: Also available in set of 5 reports PC  E99/
  MF E99, PB91-130898. Supersedes PB90-243213. See also
  PB91-130914. 16p.
  Subject index keywords:  Hazardous materials,  Arkansas,
  Waste disposal, Coordinated  procurement, Directories,  Site
  Enforcement  Tracking System, Superfund, Remedial action,
  Potentially responsible parties.
0632  Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
  Listing by Site for Arkansas
  Order Number PB91-170779CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Waste Programs Enforcement; 5 Apr 91
  When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
  hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and  Liabil-
  ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search  to identify parties
  with potential  financial  responsibility for remediation  of un-
  controlled hazardous waste  sites. EPA regional Superfund
  Waste Management Staff issued a notice letter to the poten-
  tially responsible party (PRP). Data from this notice letter is
  used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
  This data  includes PRP name and address, a company con-
  tact person,  the date the notice was issued, and the related
  CERCLA site  name  and identification number. SETS was
  created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
  ority List)  and non-NPL  sites. SETS does  not address the
  range of other administrative duties related to tracking the
  PRP. The  site  report is designed to provide PRP information
  linked by the associated site,  which appears according to the
  state where the site is located.
  Specifications: Also  available in set of 5 reports PC E99/
  MF E99, PB91-170761.  Supersedes PB91-130906. See also
  PB91-170787.  17p.
  Subject index  keywords:  Hazardous materials, Waste dis-
  posal, Superfund, Notification procedures, Directories, Arkan-
  sas, Site Enforcement Tracking System, Potentially responsi-
  ble parlies.

0633  Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
  Listing by Site for California
  Order Number  PB90-243411CDH, price: PC A07/MF A01
  Environmental  Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Waste Programs Enforcement; 2 Aug 90
  When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
  hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
  ity Act) site,  EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
  with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
  controlled  hazardous waste sites. EPA  regional  Superfund
  Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
  tially responsible party (PRP). Data from this notice letter  is
  used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
  The data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
  tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
  CERCLA site name and identification  number. SETS  was
  created to  track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
  ority List) and  non-NPL sites. SETS does not address the
  range  of other administrative duties related to tracking the
  PRP. These lists (updated quarterly) represent EPA's prelimi-
  nary findings on the identities of potentially responsible par-
  ties. Inclusion on these lists does not constitute a final deter-
  mination concerning the liability of any party for the hazard or
  contamination at any CERCLA site. The site report is de-
  signed to provide PRP information linked by the associated
  site, which appears according to California  where the site  is
  located.
  Specifications: Also available in  set of 6 reports  PC  E99/
  MF  E99, PB90-243387.  See  also PB90-243403 and PB90-
  243429. 126p.
  Subject index keywords:  Hazardous materials,  California,
  Waste disposal, Coordinated  procurement, Directories,  Site
  Enforcement  Tracking System, Superfund,  Remedial action.
                                                                                                               107

-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Enforcement
0634  Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
  Listing by Site for California
  Order Number PB91-131102CDH, price: PC A08/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Waste Programs Enforcement; 19 Dec 90
  When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
  hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
  ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
  with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
  controlled hazardous waste sites.  EPA regional Superfund
  Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
  tially responsible  party (PRP) for the state of California. Data
  from this notice letter is  used to form the Site Enforcement
  Tracking  System  (SETS). This data includes PRP name and
  address, a company contact person, the date the notice was
  issued, and the related CERCLA site name and identification
  number.  SETS was created to track PRP identification at
  both NPL (National  Priority List) and non-NPL  sites. SETS
  does not address the range of other administrative duties re-
  lated to tracking the PRP.
  Specifications: Also available in set of 6 reports PC  E99/
  MF E99,  PB91-131078. Supersedes PB90-243411. See also
  PB91-131094and PB91-131110. 157p.
  Subject index keywords:  Hazardous  materials, California,
  Waste disposal, Coordinated procurement,  Directories, Site
  Enforcement Tracking System, Superfund, Remedial action,
  Potentially responsible parties.

0635  Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
  Listing by Site for California
  Order Number PB91:170977CDH, price: PC A10/MF A02
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Waste Programs Enforcement; 5 Apr 91
  When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
  hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
  ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
  with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
  controlled hazardous waste sites.  EPA regional Superfund
  Waste Management Staff issued a notice letter to the poten-
  tially responsible party (PRP).  Data from this notice letter  is
  used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
  This data includes PRP name and address,  a company con-
  tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
  CERCLA site name and identification number. SETS was
  created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
  ority List) and non-NPL  sites. SETS does  not  address the
  range of other administrative  duties related to  tracking the
  PRP. The site report is designed to  provide  PRP information
  linked by the associated site, which appears according to the
  state where the site is located.
  Specifications: Also available in set of 6 reports PC  E99/
  MF E99,  1=891-170944. Supersedes PB91-131102. See also
  PB91-170969 and PB91-170985. 21 Op.
  Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste dis-
  posal, Superfund, Notification procedures,  Directories, Cali-
  fornia, Site Enforcement Tracking System, Potentially respon-
  sible parties.
0636  Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
  Listing by Site for Colorado
  Order Number PB90-243320CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Waste Programs Enforcement; 2 Aug 90
  When expending  Superfund  monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
  hensive  Environmental Response, Compensation  and Liabil-
  ity Act) site, EPA  must  conduct a  search to identify parties
  with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
  controlled hazardous waste sites.  EPA regional  Superfund
  Waste Management  Staff issue a notice letter to  the poten-
  tially responsible  party (PRP). Data from this notice letter is
  used to form the  Site Enforcement  Tracking System (SETS).
  The data includes PRP  name and address, a company con-
  tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
  CERCLA site name  and identification  number. SETS was
  created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
  ority List) and  non-NPL sites. SETS  does not address the
  range of other administrative duties related to tracking the
  PRP. These lists (updated quarterly) represent EPA's prelimi-
  nary findings on the  identities of potentially responsible par-
  ties. Inclusion on these lists does not constitute a final deter-
  mination concerning the liability of any party for the hazard or
  contamination at any CERCLA site. The site report  is de-
  signed to provide  PRP information  linked by the  associated
  site, which appears according to Colorado where the site is
  located.
  Specifications: Also available in set of 6 reports PC E99/
  MF E99, PB90-243312. See also PB90-243338. 65p.
  Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste dis-
  posal, Colorado,  Coordinated procurement, Directories, Site
  Enforcement Tracking System, Superfund, Remedial action.

0637  Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
  Listing by Site for Colorado
  Order Number PB91-131011CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Waste Programs Enforcement; 19 Dec 90
  When expending  Superfund  monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
  hensive  Environmental Response, Compensation  and Liabil-
  ity Act) site, EPA  must  conduct a  search to identify parties
  with potential financial  responsibility for remediation of un-
  controlled hazardous waste sites.  EPA regional  Superfund
  Waste Management  Staff issue a notice letter to  the poten-
  tially responsible  party (PRP) for the state of Colorado. Data
  from this notice letter is used to form the Site Enforcement
  Tracking  System  (SETS). This data includes PRP name and
  address,  a company  contact person, the date the  notice was
  issued, and the related CERCLA site name and identification
  number.  SETS was  created to track PRP identification at
  both NPL (National  Priority  List) and  non-NPL sites. SETS
  does not address the range of other administrative duties re-
  lated to tracking the  PRP.
  Specifications: Also available in set of 6 reports PC  E99/
  MF E99,  PB91-131003.  Supersedes PB90-243320. See also
  PB91-131029. 65p.
  Subject  index keywords:  Hazardous materials, Colorado,
  Waste disposal, Coordinated procurement,  Directories, Site
  Enforcement Tracking System, Superfund, Remedial action,
  Potentially responsible parties.
108

-------
                                                                     PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Enforcement
0638  Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
  Listing by Site for Colorado
  Order Number PB91-170886CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Waste Programs Enforcement; 5 Apr 91
  When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
  hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
  ity Act) site, EPA  must conduct a search to identify parties
  with  potential  financial responsibility for remediation of un-
  controlled hazardous waste sites.  EPA regional Superfund
  Waste Management Staff issued a notice letter to the poten-
  tially responsible party (PRP).  Data from this notice letter is
  used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
  This  data includes PRP name  and address,  a company con-
  tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
  CERCLA site  name  and identification number. SETS was
  created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
  ority  List) and non-NPL  sites. SETS does  not address the
  range of other administrative  duties  related to tracking the
  PRP. The site  report is designed to provide  PRP information
  linked by the associated site, which appears  according to the
  state where the site is located.
  Specifications: Also available in set of 6 reports PC E99/
  MF E99, PB91-170878. Supersedes PB91-131011. See also
  PB91-170894. 68p.
  Subject index keywords:  Hazardous materials, Waste  dis-
  posal, Superfund,  Notification  procedures, Directories, Colo-
  rado, Site Enforcement Tracking System, Potentially respon-
  sible parties.

0639  Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
  Listing by Site for Connecticut
  Order Number PB90-242884CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
  Environmental  Protection Agency, Washington,  DC. Office of
  Waste Programs Enforcement;  2 Aug 90
  When expending Superfund monies  at a CERCLA (Compre-
  hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
  ity Act) site, EPA  must conduct a search to identify parties
  with  potential financial responsibility  for remediation of  un-
  controlled  hazardous waste sites. EPA  regional Superfund
  Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
  tially  responsible party (PRP).  Data from this notice letter is
  used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking  System (SETS).
  The data includes PRP name and address,  a company con-
  tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
  CERCLA  site  name and identification number.  SETS was
  created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National  Pri-
  ority  List) and non-NPL sites.  SETS does not address  the
  range of other administrative duties related to tracking  the
  PRP. These lists (updated quarterly) represent EPA's prelimi-
  nary findings on the identities of potentially  responsible par-
  ties. Inclusion on these lists does not constitute a final deter-
  mination concerning the liability of any party for the hazard or
  contamination at  any CERCLA site.  The site  report is  de-
  signed to provide  PRP information linked by the associated
  site, which appears according to Connecticut where the site
  is located.
  Specifications: Also available in set of 6 reports PC E99/
  MF E99, PB90-242876. See also PB90-242892. 31 p.
  Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Connecticut,
  Waste disposal, Coordinated  procurement,  Directories, Site
  Enforcement Tracking System, Superfund, Remedial action.
0640  Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
  Listing by Site for Connecticut
  Order Number PB91-130534CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Waste Programs Enforcement; 19 Dec 90
  When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
  hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
  ity Act) site, EPA  must conduct a search to identify parties
  with  potential  financial responsibility for remediation of un-
  controlled hazardous waste sites.  EPA regional Superfund
  Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
  tially responsible party (PRP)  for the state of Connecticut.
  Data from this notice letter is used to form the Site Enforce-
  ment Tracking System (SETS). This data includes PRP name
  and address, a company contact person, the date the notice
  was  issued, and the related CERCLA site name and  identifi-
  cation number. SETS was created to track PRP identification
  at both NPL (National Priority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS
  does not address the range of other administrative duties re-
  lated to tracking the PRP.
  Specifications: Also  available in set of 6 reports PC  E99/
  MF E99,  PB91-130526. Supersedes PB90-242884. See also
  PB91-130542. 30p.
  Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Connecticut,
  Waste disposal, Coordinated procurement,  Directories,  Site
  Enforcement Tracking System, Superfund, Remedial action,
  Potentially responsible parties.

0641   Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
  Listing by Site for Connecticut
  Order Number PB91-170449CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
  Environmental  Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Waste Programs Enforcement; 5 Apr 91
  When expending Superfund monies  at a CERCLA (Compre-
  hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
  ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
  with  potential  financial responsibility for remediation of un-
  controlled hazardous waste sites.  EPA  regional Superfund
  Waste Management Staff issued a notice letter to the poten-
  tially  responsible party (PRP). Data from this notice letter is
  used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
  This  data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
  tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the  related
  CERCLA  site   name and identification number. SETS was
  created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
  ority  List) and non-NPL  sites.  SETS does not address the
  range of  other administrative duties related to tracking the
  PRP. The site report is designed to provide PRP information
  linked by the associated site, which appears according to the
  state where the site is located.
  Specifications: Also available in set of  6 reports PC E99/
  MF E99, PB91-170431. Supersedes  PB91-130534. See also
  PB91-170456. 32p.
  Subject index keywords:  Hazardous materials, Waste dis-
  posal, Superfund, Notification procedures, Directories,  Con-
  necticut, Site  Enforcement Tracking System, Potentially re-
  sponsible parties.
                                                                                                              109

-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Enforcement
0642  Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
  Listing by Site for Delaware
  Order Number PB90-242991CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Waste Programs Enforcement; 2 Aug 90
  When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
  hensive  Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
  ity Act) site, EPA  must conduct a  search to identify parties
  with potential financial responsibility for remediation of  un-
  controlled hazardous waste sites.  EPA regional Superfund
  Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
  tially responsible party (PRP).  Data from this notice letter is
  used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
  The data includes PRP name and address,  a company con-
  tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
  CERCLA site name  and identification number.  SETS was
  created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National  Pri-
  ority List) and non-NPL  sites. SETS does  not address  the
  range of other administrative  duties related to tracking  the
  PRP. These lists (updated quarterly) represent EPA's prelimi-
  nary findings on the identities  of potentially responsible par-
  ties. Inclusion on these lists does not constitute a final deter-
  mination concerning the liability of any  party  for the hazard or
  contamination at any CERCLA site. The site  report is  de-
  signed to provide  PRP information linked by the associated
  site, which  appears according  to Delaware where the site is
  located.
  Specifications: Also available  in set  of 5 reports PC  E99/
  MF E99, PB90-242983. See also PB90-243007. 28p.
  Subject  index keywords: Hazardous materials, Delaware,
  Waste disposal, Coordinated procurement,  Directories, Site
  Enforcement Tracking System, Superfund, Remedial action.

0643  Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
  Listing by Site for Delaware
  Order Number PB91-130641CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Waste Programs Enforcement; 19 Dec 90
  When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
  hensive  Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
  ity Act) site, EPA  must conduct a  search to identify parties
  with potential financial responsibility for remediation of  un-
  controlled hazardous waste sites.  EPA regional Superfund
  Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
  tially responsible party (PRP) for the state of Delaware. Data
  from this notice letter is  used  to form the Site Enforcement
  Tracking  System (SETS). This data includes PRP name and
  address, a company contact person, the date the notice was
  issued, and the related CERCLA site name and identification
  number.  SETS was created to track  PRP identification at
  both NPL (National Priority List) and  non-NPL sites. SETS
  does not address the range of other administrative duties re-
  lated to tracking the PRP.
  Specifications: Also available  in set  of 5 reports PC  E99/
  MF E99,  PB91-130633. Supersedes PB90-242991. See also
  PB91-130658. 26p.
  Subject  index keywords: Hazardous materials, Delaware,
  Waste disposal, Coordinated procurement,  Directories, Site
  Enforcement Tracking System, Superfund, Remedial action,
  Potentially responsible parties.
0644  Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
  Listing by Site for Delaware
  Order Number PB91-170555CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Waste Programs Enforcement; 5 Apr 91
  When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
  hensive  Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
  ity Act) site, EPA  must conduct a search to identify parties
  with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
  controlled hazardous waste sites.  EPA regional Superfund
  Waste Management Staff issued a notice letter to the poten-
  tially responsible party (PRP). Data from this notice letter is
  used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
  This data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
  tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
  CERCLA site name  and identification number. SETS was
  created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
  ority  List) and  non-NPL  sites. SETS does not address the
  range of other administrative duties  related to tracking the
  PRP. The site report is designed to provide PRP information
  linked by the associated site, which appears according to the
  state where the site is located.
  Specifications: Also available in set of 5 reports PC E99/
  MF E99,  PB91-170548. Supersedes PB91-130641. See also
  PB91-170563. 33p.
  Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste dis-
  posal, Superfund,  Notification procedures, Directories, Dela-
  ware,  Site Enforcement Tracking System,  Potentially respon-
  sible parties.
0645  Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
  Listing by Site for Florida
  Order Number PB90-243064CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Waste Programs Enforcement; 2 Aug 90
  When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
  hensive  Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
  ity Act) site, EPA  must conduct a search to identify parties
  with  potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
  controlled hazardous waste sites.  EPA regional Superfund
  Waste Management  Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
  tially responsible party (PRP). Data from this notice letter is
  used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
  The data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
  tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
  CERCLA site name  and identification number. SETS was
  created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
  ority  List) and  non-NPL  sites. SETS does not address the
  range of other administrative duties related to tracking the
  PRP. These lists (updated quarterly) represent EPA's prelimi-
  nary findings on the identities of potentially responsible par-
  ties. Inclusion on these lists does not constitute a final deter-
  mination concerning the liability of any party for the hazard or
  contamination at any  CERCLA site. The site report is de-
  signed to provide  PRP information linked by the associated
  site, which appears according to  Florida where the site is lo-
  cated.
  Specifications: Also available in set of 8 reports PC E99/
  MF E99, PB90-243049.  See also PB90-243056 and PB90-
  243072. 37p.
  Subject  index keywords:  Hazardous  materials,   Florida,
  Waste disposal, Coordinated procurement,  Directories,  Site
  Enforcement Tracking System, Superfund, Remedial action.
110

-------
                                                                     PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Enforcement
 0646  Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
   Listing by Site for Florida
   Order Number PB91-131219CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
   Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
   Waste Programs Enforcement; 19 Dec 90
   When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
   hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and  Liabil-
   ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to  identify parties
   with potential  financial  responsibility for  remediation  of un-
   controlled hazardous waste  sites. EPA regional Superfund
   Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
   tially  responsible party (PRP) for the state of Florida.  Data
   from this notice letter is used to form the Site Enforcement
   Tracking System (SETS). This data includes PRP name and
   address, a company contact person, the date  the notice was
   issued, and the related CERCLA site name  and identification
   number.  SETS was created to  track  PRP identification  at
   both NPL (National  Priority List)  and non-NPL sites. SETS
   does not address the range of other administrative duties re-
   lated to tracking the PRP.
   Specifications: Also  available in  set of 8 reports PC  E99/
   MF E99, PB91-130690. Supersedes PB90-243064. See also
   PB91-130708 and PB91-130716. 39p.
  Subject  index keywords:  Hazardous  materials, Florida,
  Waste disposal, Coordinated procurement,  Directories, Site
  Enforcement Tracking System, Superfund,' Remedial action,
  Potentially responsible parties.

0647  Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
  Listing by Site for Florida
  Order Number PB91-170621CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Waste Programs Enforcement; 5 Apr 91
  When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
  hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
  ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
  with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
  controlled hazardous  waste sites.  EPA regional  Superfund
  Waste Management Staff issued a notice letter to the poten-
  tially responsible party (PRP). Data from this notice letter is
  used to form the Site  Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
  This data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
  tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
  CERCLA  site name  and identification  number. SETS  was
  created to track PRP identification at both  NPL (National Pri-
  ority List) and non-NPL  sites. SETS does not address the
  range  of other administrative  duties related to tracking the
  PRP. The site report is designed to provide PRP information
  linked by the associated site, which appears according to the
  state where the site is  located.
  Specifications: Also  available in  set of 8 reports PC  E99/
  MF E99, PB91-170605. Supersedes PB91-131219. See  also
  PB91 -170613 and PB91 -170639. 47p.
  Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste dis-
  posal,  Superfund, Notification  procedures, Directories,  Flori-
  da, Site Enforcement Tracking System, Potentially responsi-
  ble parties.
 0648  Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
   Listing by Site for Georgia
   Order Number PB90-243072CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
   Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
   Waste Programs Enforcement; 2 Aug 90
   When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
   hensive  Environmental Response, Compensation and  Liabil-
   ity Act) site,  EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
   with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
   controlled  hazardous  waste sites. EPA  regional Superfund
   Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
   tially responsible party (PRP). Data from this notice letter is
   used to form the Site  Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
   The data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
   tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
   CERCLA site name  and identification number.  SETS was
   created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
   ority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS does not address the
   range  of other administrative duties related to tracking the
   PRP. These lists (updated quarterly) represent EPA's prelimi-
   nary findings on the identities of potentially responsible par-
   ties. Inclusion on these lists does not constitute a final deter-
   mination  concerning the liability of any party for the hazard or
   contamination at any  CERCLA site. The site report is de-
   signed to provide  PRP information linked by the  associated
   site, which appears according to Georgia where the site is lo-
   cated.
  Specifications: Also available in set of 8 reports PC  E99/
   MF E99, PB90-243049. See also PB90-243064 and PB90-
  243080. 19p.
  Subject  index keywords: Hazardous  materials, Georgia,
  Waste  disposal, Coordinated procurement, Directories,  Site
  Enforcement Tracking  System, Superfund, Remedial action.

0649  Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
  Listing by Site for Georgia
  Order  Number PB91-130716CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Waste Programs Enforcement; 19 Dec 90
  When  expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
  hensive Environmental  Response, Compensation and Liabil-
  ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
  with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
  controlled hazardous waste sites.  EPA  regional  Superfund
  Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
  tially responsible party  (PRP) for the state of Georgia.  Data
  from this  notice letter is used to form the Site Enforcement
  Tracking System (SETS). This data includes PRP  name and
  address, a company contact person, the date the notice was
  issued,  and  the related CERCLA site,name and identification
  number. SETS was created to track  PRP identification at
  both NPL (National Priority  List)  and non-NPL sites. SETS
  does not address the range of other administrative duties re-
  lated to tracking the PRP.
  Specifications: Also available in  set of 8  reports PC E99/
  MF E99, PB91-130690. Supersedes PB90-243072. See also
  PB91-131219 and PB91-130724. 17p.
  Subject index keywords:  Hazardous  materials,  Georgia,
  Waste  disposal, Coordinated procurement, Directories,  Site
  Enforcement Tracking System, Superfund,  Remedial  action,
  Potentially responsible parties.
                                                                                                              111

-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Enforcement
0650  Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
  Listing by Site for Georgia
  Order Number PB91-170639CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Waste Programs Enforcement; 5 Apr 91
  When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
  hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
  ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a  search to identify parties
  with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
  controlled hazardous waste sites.  EPA regional Superfund
  Waste Management  Staff issued a  notice letter to the poten-
  tially responsible party (PRP). Data from this notice letter  is
  used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
  This data includes PRP name and  address, a company con-
  tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
  CERCLA site name  and identification number. SETS  was
  created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
  ority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS does  not  address the
  range of other administrative duties related to  tracking the
  PRP.  The site report is designed to provide PRP information
  linked by the associated  site, which appears according to the
  state where the site is located.
  Specifications: Also available in set of 8 reports PC E99/
  MF E99, PB91-170605. Supersedes PB91-130716. See also
  PB91-170621 and PB91-170647. 20p.
  Subject  Index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste dis-
  posal, Superfund, Notification procedures,  Directories, Geor-
  gia, Site  Enforcement Tracking System, Potentially responsi-
  ble parties.
0651  Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
  Listing by Site for Idaho
  Order Number PB90-243460CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Waste Programs Enforcement; 2 Aug 90
  When expending  Superfund monies at a  CERCLA (Compre-
  hensive Environmental Response,  Compensation and Liabil-
  ity Act) site,  EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
  with potential financial responsibility for  remediation of un-
  controlled  hazardous waste sites.  EPA regional Superfund
  Waste Management Staff issue a  notice letter to the poten-
  tially  responsible  party (PRP). Data from  this notice letter is
  used  to form the  Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
  The data includes PRP name and  address, a company con-
  tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
  CERCLA site name and  identification number. SETS was
  created to track PRP identification  at both NPL (National Pri-
  ority  List) and non-NPL sites. SETS does not  address the
  range of other administrative duties related to  tracking the
  PRP. These lists (updated quarterly) represent EPA's prelimi-
  nary  findings on the identities of potentially responsible par-
  ties. Inclusion on  these lists does not constitute  a final deter-
  mination concerning the liability of any party for the hazard or
  contamination at any CERCLA site. The site report is de-
  signed to provide PRP information linked by the associated
  site, which appears according to Idaho where the site is  lo-
  cated.
  Specifications: Also available in set of 3 reports, PC E99/
  MF E99, PB90-243452. See also PB90-243478. 7p.
  Subject  index   keywords:  Hazardous  materials,  Idaho,
  Waste disposal,  Coordinated procurement, Directories, Site
  Enforcement Tracking System, Superfund, Remedial action.
0652  Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
  Listing by Site for Idaho
  Order Number PB91-131151CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Waste Programs Enforcement; 19 Dec 90
  When expending Superfund  monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
  hensive Environmental Response, Compensation  and  Liabil-
  ity Act)  site, EPA must  conduct a  search to identify parties
  with  potential financial  responsibility for remediation of un-
  controlled hazardous waste sites.  EPA regional  Superfund
  Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to  the poten-
  tially responsible party  (PRP) for the state of Idaho.  Data
  from this notice letter is used to form the  Site Enforcement
  Tracking System (SETS). This data includes PRP name and
  address, a company contact person, the date the  notice was
  issued, and the related CERCLA site name and identification
  number.  SETS was created to track PRP identification at
  both NPL (National  Priority  List) and non-NPL sites. SETS
  does not address the range  of other administrative duties re-
  lated to tracking the  PRP.
  Specifications: Also available in set of 3 reports PC  E99/
  MF E99, PB91-131144.  Supersedes PB90-243460. See also
  PB91-131177. 8p.
  Subject index  keywords: Hazardous   materials,  Idaho,
  Waste disposal,  Coordinated procurement, Directories, Site
  Enforcement Tracking System, Superfund, Remedial action,
  Potentially responsible parties.

0653  Site Enforcement  Tracking System (SETS): PRP
  Listing by Site for Idaho
  Order Number PB91-171025CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Waste Programs Enforcement; 5 Apr 91
  When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
  hensive  Environmental  Response,  Compensation and Liabil-
  ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search  to identify parties
  with potential  financial  responsibility for remediation  of un-
  controlled hazardous waste sites.  EPA regional Superfund
  Waste Management Staff issued a notice letter to the poten-
  tially responsible party  (PRP). Data from this  notice letter is
  used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
  This data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
  tact person, the  date the notice was issued, and the related
  CERCLA site  name and identification number.  SETS was
  created to track  PRP identification  at both  NPL (National Pri-
  ority  List) and non-NPL sites. SETS does not address the
  range of other administrative duties related to tracking the
  PRP. The site report is designed to provide PRP information
  linked by the associated site, which appears according  to the
  state where the site is located.
  Specifications: Also available in set of 3 reports  PC E99/
  MF E99, PB91-171017. Supersedes PB91-131151.  See also
  PB91-171033. 10p.
  Subject index keywords:  Hazardous materials, Waste dis-
  posal, Superfund, Notification procedures,  Directories,  Idaho,
  Site  Enforcement Tracking System,  Potentially  responsible
  parties.
 112

-------
                                                                      PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Enforcement
  0654  Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
   Listing by Site for Illinois
   Order Number PB90-243148CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
   Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
   Waste Programs Enforcement; 2 Aug 90
   When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
   hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
   ity Act) srte, EPA must conduct a search to  identify parties
   with  potential financial responsibility for  remediation of un-
   u?" *° f,  hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
   Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
   tially responsible party (PRP). Data from this  notice  letter is
   used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System  (SETS)
   The data includes PRP name and address, a  company con-
   ^£?rf0n' the date the notice was issued. and the related
   OfcRCLA  site name and  identification number. SETS  was
   created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
   ority  List) and  non-NPL sites.  SETS does not address the
   LnDe-ru    ,er administrative duties related to tracking the
   PRP. These lists (updated  quarterly) represent  EPA's  prelimi-
   nary findings on the  identities of potentially responsible par-
   ties. Inclusion on these lists does not constitute a final deter-
   mination concerning the liability of any party for the hazard or
   contamination at  any CERCLA  site. The site  report is de-
   signed to  provide PRP information  linked  by the associated
   site  which appears according to  Illinois where  the site is lo-
   cated.
       noS: Als° available  in set of 6 reports PC E99/
  MF E99, PB90-243130. See also PB90-243155. 57p.
  Subject  index  keywords:  Hazardous  materials,  Illinois,
  Waste disposal,  Coordinated procurement, Directories, Site
  tnforcement Tracking System,  Superfund, Remedial action.

0655  Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
  Listing by Site for Illinois
  Order Number PB91-1 30781 CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Waste Programs Enforcement; 19 Dec 90
  When expending  Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
  hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
  ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
  with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
  S? I° f,  nazardous  waste sites.  EPA regional Superfund
  Waste Management Staff issue  a notice letter to the poten-
  tially responsible  party (PRP) for the  state of  Illinois  Data
  from this notice letter is used to form the Site  Enforcement
  Tracking System (SETS). This data includes PRP name and
  address, a company contact person, the date the notice was
  issued, and the related CERCLA site name and  identification
  £!£ MD,  ^TS W3S Created to  track  PRP  identification  at
  both NPL (National Priority List) and non-NPL  sites  SETS
  does not address the range of other administrative duties re-
 lated to tracking the PRP.
 Specifications: Also available in set of 6 reports PC E99/
 PRO, ,o PB91'130773- Supersedes PB90-243148. See  also
 * DX?! -\ 30/99. 56p.

 u^l60*,- index  keywords:  Hazardous  materials,  Illinois,
 Waste disposal, Coordinated procurement, Directories  Site
 Enforcement Tracking  System, Superfund,  Remedial action,
 Potentially responsible parties.
 0656  Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)- PRP
   Listing by Site for Illinois
   Order Number PB91-170704CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
   Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
   Waste Programs Enforcement; 5 Apr 91
   When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
   hensive  Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
   ity Act) site, EPA  must conduct a search  to identify parties
   with  potential financial  responsibility for remediation of un-
   controlled  hazardous waste sites. EPA  regional Superfund
   Waste Management Staff issued a notice letter to the poten-
   tially responsible party (PRP). Data from this notice letter is
   used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)
   This data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
   tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
   CERCLA site name and  identification number.  SETS was
   created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
   ority  List) and  non-NPL sites.  SETS does not address the
   range of other administrative duties related to tracking the
   PRP. The site report is designed to provide PRP information
   linked by the associated site, which appears according to the
   state where the site is located.
   Specifications: Also available  in set of 6 reports  PC E99/
   MF E99,  PB91-170696. Supersedes PB91-130781  See also
   PB91-170712. 59p.
  Subject index  keywords: Hazardous  materials,  Waste dis-
  posal, Superfund, Notification procedures,  Directories, Illinois
  Site  Enforcement Tracking System,  Potentially responsible
  parties.

0657  Site  Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)- PRP
  Listing by Site for Indiana
  Order Number PB90-243155CDH, price: PC A07/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Waste Programs Enforcement; 2 Aug 90
  When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
  hensive Environmental Response, Compensation  and Liabil-
  ity Act) site,  EPA must conduct a  search to identify parties
  with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
  controlled hazardous  waste sites.  EPA regional  Superfund
 Waste Management Staff issue  a notice letter to  the poten-
 tially responsible party (PRP). Data from this notice letter is
 used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)
 The  data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
 tact person, the date the notice  was issued, and the related
 CERCLA site  name and identification  number. SETS  was
 created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National  Pri-
 ority List)  and non-NPL sites. SETS does  not address  the
 range of other administrative duties related to tracking  the
 PRP. These lists (updated quarterly) represent EPA's prelimi-
 nary  findings on the identities of potentially responsible par-
 ties. Inclusion on these lists does not constitute a final deter-
 mination concerning  the liability of any party for the hazard or
 contamination  at any CERCLA site. The site report is de-
 signed to provide PRP information linked by the associated
 site, which appears according to Indiana where the site is lo-
 cated.
 Specifications: Also available in  set of 6  reports PC E99/
 MF E99, PB90-243130. See also PB90-243148 and  PB90-
 243163. 137p.
 Subject index keywords:  Hazardous  materials,  Indiana,
 Waste disposal, Coordinated procurement, Directories Site
 Enforcement  Tracking System, Superfund, Remedial action
                                                                                                              113

-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Enforcement
0658  Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
  Listing by Site for Indiana
  Order Number PB91-130799CDH, price: PC A07/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Waste Programs Enforcement; 19 Dec 90
  When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
  hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
  ity Act)  site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
  with potential financial responsibility for remediation  of un-
  controlled hazardous waste  sites. EPA regional Superfund
  Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
  tially responsible party (PRP) for  the state of Indiana. Data
  from this notice letter is used to form the Site Enforcement
  Tracking System (SETS). This data includes PRP  name and
  address, a company contact  person, the date the notice was
  issued,  and the related CERCLA site name and  identification
  number. SETS was  created to track PRP identification  at
  both  NPL (National Priority  List)  and non-NPL sites.  SETS
  does not address the range of other administrative duties re-
  lated to tracking the PRP.
  Specifications: Also available in set of 6 reports PC E99/
   MF E99, PB91-130773. Supersedes PB90-243155. See also
   PB91-130781 and PB91-130807. 137p.
   Subject index keywords:  Hazardous materials,  Indiana,
   Waste  disposal, Coordinated procurement, Directories, Site
   Enforcement Tracking System, Superfund, Remedial action,
   Potentially responsible parties.
 0659  Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
   Listing by Site for Indiana
   Order Number PB91-170712CDH, price: PC A07/MF A01
   Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
   Waste Programs Enforcement; 5 Apr 91
   When  expending  Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
   hensive Environmental Response,  Compensation and Liabil-
   ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
   with potential  financial responsibility for remediation of  un-
   controlled hazardous  waste sites.  EPA regional Superfund
   Waste Management Staff issued a notice letter to the poten-
   tially responsible  party (PRP). Data from this notice letter is
   used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
   This data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
   tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
    CERCLA site name and identification number. SETS was
    created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
    ority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS does not address the
    range of other administrative duties related to tracking the
    PRP. The site report is designed to provide PRP information
    linked by the associated site, which appears according to the
    state where the site is located.
    Specifications: Also available in set  of 6 reports PC E99/
    MF E99, PB91-170696. Supersedes PB91-130799. See also
    PB91-170704 and PB91-170720.140p.
    Subject Index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste dis-
    posal, Superfund, Notification procedures,  Directories, Indi-
    ana, Site Enforcement Tracking System, Potentially responsi-
    ble parties.
0660  Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
  Listing by Site for Iowa
  Order Number PB90-243270CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Waste Programs Enforcement; 2 Aug 90
  When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
  hensive Environmental Response, Compensation  and Liabil-
  ity Act)  site, EPA must conduct  a  search to identify parties
  with potential financial  responsibility  for remediation of un-
  controlled hazardous waste  sites.  EPA  regional  Superfund
  Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to  the poten-
  tially responsible party (PRP). Data from this notice letter is
  used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETb).
  The data includes PRP name and  address, a company con-
  tact person, the date the  notice was  issued, and  the related
  CERCLA site  name and identification number.  SETb was
  created to track PRP identification  at both NPL (National Pri-
  ority  List) and non-NPL sites. SETS  does not address  he
  range of other administrative duties  related to tracking the
  PRP These lists (updated quarterly) represent EPA's prelimi-
  nary findings on the identities of potentially responsible par-
  ties Inclusion on these lists does not constitute a final deter-
   mination concerning the liability of any party for the hazard or
   contamination at any CERCLA  site.  The site report is  de-
   signed to provide PRP information linked by the associated
   site, which appears according to Iowa where the site is locat-
   ed.'
   Specifications:  Also available in  set of  4 reports PC E99/
   MF E99, PB90-243262. See also PB90-243288. 25p.
   Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste  dis-
   posal  Iowa, Coordinated procurement,  Directories, Site En-
   forcement Tracking System, Superfund, Remedial action.

 0661  Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
   Listing by Site  for Iowa                 Ano/MC Am
   Order Number PB91-130963CDH,  price: PC A03/MF A01
   Environmental Protection Agency,  Washington, DC. Office of
   Waste Programs Enforcement; 19 Dec 90
   When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
   hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
   ity Act) site, EPA must  conduct a search to identify parties
   with potential financial responsibility for  remediation  of  un-
   controlled  hazardous  waste sites.  EPA regional Superfund
   Waste Management Staff issue a notice  letter to the poten-
   tially responsible party (PRP) for the state of Iowa. Data from
   this notice letter is used to form the Site Enforcement Track-
    ing System (SETS). This data includes PRP  name and ad-
    dress, a company contact person,  the date the notice was
    issued, and the related CERCLA  site name and  identification
    number. SETS was created to  track  PRP identification at
    both NPL (National  Priority List) and non-NPL sites.  SETb
    does not address the range of other administrative duties re-
    lated to tracking the PRP.
    Specifications: Also  available in set of 4 reports PC E99/
    MF E99, PB91-130955. Supersedes PB90-243270. See  also
    PB91-130971. 23p.
    Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Iowa, Waste
    disposal, Coordinated procurement, Directories,  Site Enforce-
    ment Tracking System, Superfund,  Remedial action, Poten-
    tially responsible parties.
   114

-------
                                                                     PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Enforcement
                                 System (SETS): PRP

   Order Number PB91-170837CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
   Was rpTnl   pefCti°n AS6™* Washington, DC. Office of
   waste Programs Enforcement; 5 Apr 91
   When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-

             VlrEPAmtaltReSPH0nSe' C°mPensat^ aid SL
                r A ™St conduct a search to identify parties
             h   ?fnCial resP°nsibility for remediation of un-
             hazardous waste sites.  EPA  regional Superfund
   Waste Management Staff issued a notice letter to the Doten

    sld tXrm'tt SW* °ata fr°m this ^e^l
   TW- t    ,  f Slte Enforcement Tracking  System  (SETS)
   This data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
   caER£?ASOrVhe  date the  n°tice was issued'  anSe related
   nrno  * *  ,   ,na,me  and identification number. SETS  was
   created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Prf
   ority L.st) and non-NPL sites. SETS does not address the
   paRTT°hfp0t?er administrative duties related  to S£g X
        bv th?3rPO!ltIS^eSigned t0  provide pRP information
                                 .
                 Also Bailable in  set of 4 reports PC
  Subject index keywords:  Hazardous materials, Waste dis-
  Sto  FnfUPerfUnd; Notification procedures, Directories  Iowa
  parties     m     aCking System'  Potentially  responsible

0663  Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
  Listing by Site for Kansas             v=>**9). rnr
  Order Number PB90-243288CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Waste Programs Enforcement; 2 Aug 90
  When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre
  faTZn 5tnV'rcSTental ResP°nse> Compensation and Liabil-
   •th   t   •' I     must c°nduct a search to identify parties
  rnntmi?^ h  financial responsibility for remediation of un-
  controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
  Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten

  3 to lorm'th^ SW^ °ata from this notice le«er is
  used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)
  The data includes PRP name and address a company con-
  PFRrfT °n-     date the notice was issued, and the related
 ™l",  IT* *   .Pame and  identification number.  SETS was
 created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National^
 ority  List) and  non-NPL sites.  SETS  does not address the
 pappeTh  °* ,ert adm|nistrative duties related to tracking the
 PRP. These lists (updated quarterly) represent EPA's prelimi-
 nary findings on the identities nf nnu>nti<,ii., ,.	:,_,_ _
f/,ce c'nnao°ns: Also available in set of 4 reports PC E99/
^43296       "
              k;?yvTds: Hazardous materials, Waste dis-
Enn       t T  C°ordinated  procurement, Directories, Site
Enforcement Tracking  System, Superfund, Remedial action
  0664  Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
    Listing by Site for Kansas
    Order Number PB91-130971CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
    Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC Office of
    Waste Programs Enforcement; 19 Dec 90
    When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
    hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
    ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to  identify parties
   with  potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
   controlled  hazardous  waste sites.  EPA regional Superfund
   Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
   tially responsible party (PRP)  for the  state of  Kansas. Data
   from this notice letter is used to form the Site Enforcement
   Tracking System (SETS). This data includes PRP name and
   address, a company contact person, the date the notice was
   issued, and the related CERCLA site name and identification
   nTbMn,S^TS W3S created to track PRP identification at
   both  NPL (National Priority List) and  non-NPL sites  SETS
   does not address the range of other administrative duties re-
   lated to tracking the PRP.
   Specifications: Also available in set of 4 reports PC E99/
   MF E99, PB91-130955. Supersedes PB90-243288 See also
   PB91-130963 and PB91-130989. 31 p.
  Subject index keywords: Hazardous  materials, Kansas
  Waste disposal, Coordinated procurement, Directories  Site
  Enforcement Tracking System, Superfund,  Remedial  action
  Potentially responsible parties.

0665  Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)- PRP
  Listing by Site for Kansas
  Order Number PB91-170845CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Waste Programs Enforcement; 5 Apr 91
  When expending Superfund monies at  a  CERCLA (Compre-
  hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and  Liabil-
  ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
  with potential financial  responsibility  for remediation of un-
  controlled hazardous waste sites.  EPA regional Superfund
  Waste Management Staff issued a notice letter to the poten-
  tially responsible party (PRP). Data from this notice letter is
  used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)
  This data includes PRP  name and address, a company con-
  t?ct person, the date  the notice was issued, and the related
 CERCLA site name and identification  number. SETS was
 created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
 ority List) and  non-NPL sites. SETS  does not  address the
 range of other administrative duties related to  tracking the
 PRP. The site report is designed to provide PRP information
 linked by the associated  site, which appears according to the
 state where the site is located.
 Specifications: Also available in set  of 4 reports PC  E99/
 MF E99, PB91-170829. Supersedes PB91 -130971. See also
 PB91-170837 and PB91-170852. 34p.
 Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials,  Waste dis-
 posal,   Superfund,  Notification  procedures,  Directories
 Kansas,  Site  Enforcement Tracking System,  Potentially re-
 sponsible parties.
                                                                                                            115

-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Enforcement
0666  Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
  Listing by Site for Kentucky
  Order Number PB90-243080CDH, price: PC A05/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Waste Programs Enforcement; 2 Aug 90
  When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
  hensive Environmental Response,  Compensation and Liabil-
  ity Act)  site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
  with potential  financial responsibility for remediation  of  un-
  controlled hazardous waste sites.  EPA  regional Superfund
  Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
  tially responsible party (PRP). Data from this notice letter is
  used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
  The data includes  PRP name and address, a company con-
  tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
  CERCLA site name and  identification number. SETS was
  created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
  ority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS does not address  the
  range of other administrative duties related to tracking  the
  PRP. These lists (updated quarterly) represent EPA's prelimi-
  nary findings on the identities of potentially responsible  par-
  ties. Inclusion on these lists does not constitute a final deter-
  mination concerning the liability of any  party for the hazard or
  contamination at any CERCLA site. The site  report  is de-
   signed  to provide  PRP information linked by the associated
   site, which appears according to Kentucky where the site is
   located.
   Specifications: Also available in set  of 8 reports PC E99/
   MF E99, PB90-243049. See also PB90-243072 and  PB90-
   243098. 97p.
   Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials,  Kentucky,
   Waste disposal, Coordinated procurement, Directories,  Site
   Enforcement Tracking System, Superfund,  Remedial  action.

 0667  Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
   Listing by Site for Kentucky
   Order Number PB91-130724CDH, price: PC A05/MF A01
   Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
   Waste Programs Enforcement; 19 Dec 90
   When  expending  Superfund  monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
   hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
   ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
   with potential financial responsibility  for remediation of un-
   controlled  hazardous waste sites. EPA regional  Superfund
   Waste  Management Staff issue a notice letter to  the poten-
   tially responsible party (PRP) for the state of Kentucky.  Data
   from this notice letter is  used to form the Site Enforcement
   Tracking System  (SETS). This data includes PRP name and
    address, a company contact person, the date the  notice was
    issued, and the related CERCLA site name and identification
    number. SETS was created to  track PRP identification at
    both NPL  (National Priority List)  and non-NPL sites. SETS
    does not address the range of other administrative duties re-
    lated to tracking the PRP.
    Specifications: Also available in set of 8 reports PC  E99/
    MF E99, PB91-130690. Supersedes  PB90-243098. See also
    PB91-130716 and PB91-130732. 97p.
    Subject Index keywords:  Hazardous materials,  Kentucky,
    Waste disposal,  Coordinated procurement, Directories, Site
    Enforcement Tracking System, Superfund, Remedial action,
    Potentially responsible parties.
0668  Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
  Listing by Site for Kentucky
  Order Number PB91 -170647CDH, price: PC A05/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Waste Programs Enforcement; 5 Apr 91
  When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
  hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
  ity Act)  site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
  with potential financial responsibility for remediation  of un-
  controlled hazardous waste  sites. EPA regional Superfund
  Waste Management Staff issued a notice letter to the poten-
  tially responsible party (PRP). Data from this notice letter is
  used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
  This data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
  tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
  CERCLA  site name and identification number.  SETS was
  created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
  ority List) and  non-NPL sites. SETS  does not address the
  range of  other administrative duties related to tracking the
  PRP  The site report is designed to provide PRP information
  linked by the associated site, which appears according to the
  state where the site is located.
  Specifications: Also available in set of  8  reports PC E99/
  MF E99  PB91 -170605. Supersedes PB91-130724. See also
  PB91-170639 and PB91-170732. 99p.
  Subject index keywords:  Hazardous materials, Waste dis-
   posal Superfund, Notification procedures,  Directories, Ken-
  tucky, Site Enforcement Tracking System, Potentially respon-
   sible parties.
 0669 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
   Listing by Site for Louisiana
   Order Number PB90-243221CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
   Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
   Waste Programs Enforcement; 2 Aug  90
   When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
   hensive Environmental  Response, Compensation and Liabil-
   ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search  to identify  parties
   with potential  financial responsibility for remediation of  un-
   controlled hazardous  waste sites. EPA regional  Superfund
   Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
   tially responsible  party (PRP). Data from this notice  etter is
   used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SET&).
   The data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
   tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
   CERCLA site name and  identification  number. SETS was
   created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
   ority  List) and non-NPL sites. SETS does not address the
   range of other administrative duties related to tracking the
    PRp These lists (updated quarterly)  represent EPA s prelimi-
    nary findings on the identities of potentially responsible  par-
   ties Inclusion on these lists does not constitute a final deter-
    mination concerning the liability of any party for the hazard or
    contamination at any  CERCLA site. The site  report is de-
    signed to provide PRP information linked by the associated
    site, which  appears according to Louisiana where the site is
    located.
    Specifications: Also available in set of 5 reports PC ESS/
    MF E99, PB90-243205. See also PB90-243213  and PB90-
    243239. 26p.
    Subject index keywords:  Hazardous materials, Louisiana,
    Waste disposal, Coordinated procurement, Directories,  Site
    Enforcement Tracking System,  Superfund, Remedial action.
   116

-------
                                                                     PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Enforcement
  0670  Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
    Listing by Site for Louisiana
    Order Number PB91-130914CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01

    wSSf' PfpT tl0n AgenCy' Washington, DC. Office of
    waste Programs Enforcement; 19 Dec 90
    When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-

    itv ATtt SnpV'pSTental ReSP°nSe' ComP^ation and Liabil-
   2th  nV*' , f  mUSt Conduct a search to  ide"«fy parties
   ^ntrni? H^1 ^ ndal "^Po™"* for remediation of un-
   S o M   hazardous waste sites.  EPA regional Superfund
   Waste Management  Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-

   f om thr"? le,P»rty .(PRP) f°r the State of Louisiana' Date
   from his notice letter is used to form the Site Enforcement
   Trackmg System (SETS). This data Includes PRP name and
   address, a company contact person, the date the notice  was

                 re'ate
       NPI  ™ rn       t0 track PRP identification at
   both NPL (National Priority List) and non-NPL sites  SETS
               : Also  available in set of 5 reports PC
                              S^M-  "•"— **".

°6|7\-Sit! Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
  Listing by Site for Louisiana
  Order Number PB91-170787CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
  Ste^nnr31 Pr°tefction ^enc^' Washington, DC. Office of
  waste Programs Enforcement; 5 Apr 91
  When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
            'ppTental ReSP°nSe' ComPensation  and Lia'bl
              PA mUSt C0nduct a search to identify parties
  ™ntr,  n    flt!fncial resPonsibi'ity  for remediation of un-
  controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA  regional  Superfund
  Waste Management Staff issued a notice letter to  the poten
  tally responsible party (PRP). Data from this notice  letter is
  used to  form the Site Enforcement Tracking  System  (SETS?
 This data ,nc udes PRP name and address, a company  con-
 tact person the date the notice was issued,  and the related
 rf R£h t f 6 ," ™e and 'deification number. SETS  was
 created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri
 ority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS  does not address the
             r administrative duties related  to tracking the
              reporVs deigned to provide PRP information
 Specifications: Also available in set of 5 reports PC E99/
 PB9fl7n7?o1"1H°o7D61- ^^des PB91-130P914 See also
 PB91 -1 70779 and PB91 -1 70795.  26p.
 Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste dis-
 ana  SitUFeiJUnd> Notifl^ation Procedures, Directories, Louisl
 bTe p r? Enforcement Trackl'ng System, Potentially responsi-
  0672  Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)- PRP
    Listing by Site for Maine
    Order Number PB90-242892CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
    Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
    Waste Programs Enforcement; 2 Aug 90
    When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
    hensive Environmental Response, Compensation  and Liabil-
    ity Act)  site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
    with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
    controlled hazardous waste sites.  EPA  regional  Superfund
    Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to  the poten-
    tially responsible party (PRP). Data from this notice  letter is
    used to  form the Site Enforcement Tracking  System  (SETS)
   The data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
   !?.£* Person, the date the notice was issued,  and the related
   UERCLA site name and identification number. SETS was
   created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
   ority  List) and non-NPL sites. SETS does not address the
   range of other administrative duties related  to tracking the
   PRP. These lists (updated quarterly) represent EPA's  prelimi-
   nary findings on the identities of potentially responsible par-
   ties. Inclusion on these lists does not constitute a final deter-
   mination  concerning the liability of any party for the  hazard or
   contamination  at any CERCLA site.  The site report  is de-
   signed to provide PRP information linked by  the associated
   site  which appears according to Maine where the  site is lo-
   C3TGC1.

   Specifications: Also  available in  set of 6 reports  PC E99/
   ^oon"'  PB9°-242876- See  also PB90-242884 and  PB90-
   ^.4&yOO. o9p.

   Subject  index  keywords:   Hazardous materials,  Maine
  Waste disposal, Coordinated  procurement, Directories  Site
  Enforcement Tracking System, Superfund, Remedial action.

0673  Site  Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
  Listing by Site for Maine
  Order Number PB91-130542CDH, price: PC A05/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Waste Programs Enforcement; 19 Dec 90
  When  expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
  hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and  Liabil-
  ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
  with potential financial  responsibility for remediation of un-
  controlled  hazardous waste sites. EPA  regional  Superfund
  Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
  tially responsible party  (PRP)  for the  state of Maine.  Data
  from this notice letter is used  to form  the Site Enforcement
 Tracking System (SETS). This  data includes PRP name and
 address, a company contact person, the date the notice was
 issued, and the related CERCLA site name and identification
 h^ MO,  IIs Was  created to track  PRP identification at
 both NPL  (National Priority List) and non-NPL sites SETS
 does not address the range of other administrative duties re-
 lated to tracking the PRP.
 Specifications: Also available  in set of 6 reports PC  E99/
 MF E99, PB91-130526. Supersedes PB90-242892  See also
 PB91-130534 and PB91-130559. 79p.
 Subject index  keywords:  Hazardous  materials,  Maine,
 Waste disposal,  Coordinated procurement, Directories  Site
 Enforcement Tracking System,  Superfund,  Remedial  action
 Potentially responsible parties.
                                                                                                           117

-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Enforcement
0674 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
  Listing by Site for Maine
  Order Number PB91-170456CDH, price: PC A05/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Waste Programs Enforcement; 5 Apr 91
  When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
  hensive Environmental Response,  Compensation and Liabil-
  ity Act)  site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
  with potential  financial responsibility for remediation  of  un-
  controlled hazardous  waste sites.  EPA  regional Superfund
  Waste Management Staff issued a notice letter to the poten-
  tially responsible party (PRP). Data from this notice letter is
  used to form the Site  Enforcement Tracking System (SETb).
  This data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
  tact person, the date  the notice was issued, and the related
  CERCLA site name  and  identification number. SETS was
  created to track PRP  identification at both NPL  (National Pn-
   ority  List) and non-NPL sites. SETS does not address the
   range of other administrative duties  related to tracking the
   PRP. The site report is designed to provide PRP information
   linked by the associated site, which appears according to the
   state where the site is located.
   Specifications: Also  available in set of 6 reports PC E99/
   MF E99i PB91-170431. Supersedes PB91-130542. See also
   PB91-170449 and PB91-170464. 81p.
   Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste dis-
   posal, Superfund, Notification procedures, Directories,  Maine,
   Site  Enforcement Tracking System,  Potentially responsible
   parties.
  0675  Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
    Listing by Site for Maryland
    Order Number PB90-243007CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
    Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
    Waste Programs Enforcement; 2 Aug 90
    When expending Superfund  monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
    hensive Environmental Response, Compensation  and Liabil-
    ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a  search to identify parties
    with  potential financial  responsibility  for remediation of un-
    controlled hazardous waste  sites.  EPA  regional  Superfund
    Waste  Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
    tially responsible party (PRP). Data from this notice  letter is
    used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System  (SETS).
    The  data includes PRP name and  address, a company con-
    tact  person, the date the  notice was  issued, and  the related
    CERCLA  site  name  and identification number.  SETS was
    created to track PRP identification  at both NPL (National Pri-
    ority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS  does not address the
    range  of  other administrative duties  related to tracking the
    pRPi These lists (updated quarterly) represent EPA's prelimi-
    nary findings on the identities of potentially responsible par-
    ties  Inclusion on these lists does not constitute a final  deter-
    mination concerning the liability of any party for the hazard or
    contamination at any CERCLA site.  The site report  is  de-
    signed to provide PRP information linked  by the associated
    site, which appears according to Maryland where the  site  is
    located.
    Specifications: Also available in  set of 5 reports PC E99/
     MF  E99, PB90-242983.  See also PB90-242991 and  PB90-
     243015. 22p.
     Subject  index  keywords:  Hazardous  materials, Maryland,
     Waste disposal, Coordinated procurement, Directories,  Site
     Enforcement Tracking System,  Superfund, Remedial  action.
0676  Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
  Listing by Site for Maryland
  Order Number PB91 -130658CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Waste Programs Enforcement; 19 Dec 90
  When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
  hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
  ity Act)  site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
  with potential financial  responsibility for remediation of un-
  contrSed hazardous waste  sites. EPA regional Superfund
  Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to he poten-
  tially responsible party (PRP) for the state °j. M^f"^*3.
  from this notice letter  is used to form the Site Enforcement
  Tracking System (SETS). This data includes PRP name and
  address a company contact person, the date the notice was
  issued,  and the related CERCLA site name and  ident.f.cat.on
  number. SETS was created to track  W *****»"*
  both  NPL  (National Priority  List) and non-NPL sites  SETS
  does not address the range of other administrative duties re-
   lated to tracking the PRP.
   Specifications:  Also available in set of 5 reports PC E99/
   MFE99 PB91-130633. Supersedes PB90-243007. See also
   PB91-130641  and PB91-130666. 20p.
   Subject index  keywords:  Hazardous materials, Maryland,
   Waste  disposal,  Coordinated procurement, Directories, Site
   Enforcement Tracking System, Superfund, Remed.al action,
   Potentially responsible parties.
 0677  Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
   Listing by Site for Maryland
   Order Number PB91 -170563CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
   Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
   Waste Programs Enforcement; 5 Apr 91
   When  expending Superfund monies at a  CERCLA (Compre-
   hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
   ity Act) site,  EPA must conduct a search to identify  parties
   with potential financial responsibility for  remediation of  un-
   controlled hazardous waste sites.  EPA  regional  Superfund
   Waste Management Staff issued a notice letter to the poten-
   tially responsible party (PRP). Data from th.s notice letter is
    used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETb).
    This data includes PRP name and address,  a company con-
    tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
    CERCLA site name  and identification number SETS was
    created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pn-
    ority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS  does  not address  he
    range of other  administrative duties  related to tracking the
    PRP  The site report is designed to provide PRP information
    linked by the associated site, which appears according to the
    state where the site is located.
    Specifications: Also available in set of 5  reports PC  E99/
    MFE99PB91-170548. Supersedes PB91-130658. See also
    PB91-170555 and PB91-170571. 27p.
    Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste dis-
    posal, Superfund, Notification procedures, Directories, Mary-
    land, Site Enforcement Tracking System, Potentially respon-
    sible parties.
    118

-------
                                                                      PROGRAM IMPLEMENTAT70N: Enforcement
  °6,7*  Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)- PRP
    Listing by Site for Massachusetts
    Order Number PB90-242900CDH, price: PC
    wrth r    r ,  ,                a searc  to identify parties
    control    HanC'al resP°nsibility for remediation of un
    w»S  f? nazardous waste  sites. EPA regional Superfund
    Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the Sen

    used  oTorthe sT/V^' ^ fr°m this "oBoe «£?!






   PRP TheS .ertadmHiStrfiVe duties related to  trackiS he
   HHP These lists (updated quarterly) represent EPA's orelimi
                                 set of 6 reports PC E99/
  242918 219p"	"" "' "^ a'BU PB9°-242892 and PB90-
06,7.9i.Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)- PRP
  L.stmg by Site for Massachusetts            '"
  Order Number PB91-130559CDH, price: PC A10/MF A02

  WasteTroa!»™T?™ A"ncy' Washin9ton, DC. Office of
  waste Programs Enforcement; 20 Dec 90
  When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Comore-

  S A*f ItT'S mualtReSPH0nSe' ComPensation and'SbH-
            '       ust cnduct a search to identify parties
                        sP°ns»y for remediation of un
                     waste sites. EPA  regional Superfund
                   Staff issue a notice 'etter to the poten
                        P) f°r the State of MassachES.


                     ^^^

                          °f
               Also
                            in set of 6 reports PC E99/
Sffw intd^- keywords: Hazardous materials, Massachu-
  0680  Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
   Listing by Site for Massachusetts
   Order Number PB91-170464CDH, price: PC A10/MF A02
   tnvironmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
   Waste  Programs Enforcement; 5 Apr 91
   When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
   hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
   ty Act) site,  EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
   SI P,? !T,lal  '"f ncial resP°nsibility for remediation of un-
   waot  I8/,  hazardous  waste sites. EPA  regional Superfund
   Waste Management Staff issued a notice letter to the poten-
   tially responable party (PRP). Data from this notice  letter is
   used to form  the Site  Enforcement Tracking  System  (SETS)
   This data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
         r°Vhe date the notice was issued-  ar>d the related
          > Sl   ,n!S£ and ider|tif'cation number. SETS  was
          n  H   R^ ldentification at both NPL (National Pri-
          ? 3hnd "°?~NPL Sites' SETS does not address the
       T?   6r adm|mstrative  duties related  to tracking the
       TJ9*    reP°rt is desi9ned to provide PRP information
       »* the associated site, which appears according to the
  state where the site is located.

  f£e^''Cations: Also availab|e in set of 6 reports PC E99/
  PBQ1 9i97n^«91-1J°o4o31- SuPersedes PB91-130559. See alo
  PB91 -170456 and PB91 -170472. 220p.
  Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste dis-
  posal, Superfund, Notification procedures, Directories, Mas-

                                             ' P°tentially
 Order Number PB90-243163CDH, price: PC A08/MF A01
 Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
 Waste Programs Enforcement; 2 Aug 90
 When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
 SvTtf  the date the notice was issued.  and the related
 OhRCLA site name and identification number. SETS was
   3    ° tra°k PRN ,identification at both NPL (National Pri-
           K  nTNPL Sites- SETS does not address the
         Oth1er: administrative duties related  to tracking the
 nf36 llsts ("Pdated quarterly)  represent EPA's prelimi-
 nary findings on the identities of potentially responsible par-
 ties.  Inclusion on these lists does not constitute a final deter-
 mination concerning the liability of any party for the  hazard or
 cpntarmnat,on  at any  CERCLA site.  The site report  is de-
signed to prov.de PRP information linked by  the associated
Seated    appears according to Michigan where the site is
         n: AIS° available in set of 6 reports  PC E99/
               43130> See a'S° PB9°-243155 and PB90-
                                                          wt, keywords: Hazardous materials, Michigan
                                                          Waste disposal, Coordinated procurement, Directories Site
                                                          Enforcement Tracking System, Superfund, Remedial action
                                                                                                            119

-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Enforcement
0682  Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
  Listing by Site for Michigan
  Order Number PB91-130807CDH, price: PC A08/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Waste Programs Enforcement; 19 Dec 90
  When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
  hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
  ity Act)  site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
  with potential  financial responsibility for remediation  of  un-
  controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA  regional Superfund
  Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
  tially responsible party (PRP) for the state of Michigan. Data
  from this notice letter is used to form the Site Enforcement
  Tracking System (SETS). This  data includes PRP name and
   address, a company contact person, the date the notice was
   issued,  and the related CERCLA site name and identification
   number. SETS was  created to track PRP identification at
   both  NPL  (National Priority List) and  non-NPL sites. SETS
   does not address the range of other administrative duties re-
   lated to tracking the PRP.
   Specifications: Also  available in set of 6 reports PC E99/
   MF E99, PB91-130773. Supersedes PB90-243163. See also
   PB91-130799 and PB91-130815. 158p.
   Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials,  Michigan,
   Waste  disposal, Coordinated  procurement, Directories,  Site
   Enforcement Tracking System, Superfund, Remedial action,
   Potentially responsible parties.
  0683  Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
   Listing by Site for Michigan
   Order Number PB91-170720CDH, price: PC A08/MF A01
   Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
   Waste Programs Enforcement; 5 Apr 91
   When  expending  Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
   hensive Environmental Response, Compensation  and Liabil-
   ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
   with potential financial responsibility  for remediation of un-
    controlled  hazardous waste sites.  EPA regional Superfund
    Waste Management Staff  issued a notice letter to the poten-
    tially responsible party (PRP). Data from this notice letter is
    used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
    This data includes PRP name and  address, a company con-
    tact person, the date the  notice was issued, and the related
    CERCLA site name  and identification number.  SETS was
    created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
    ority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS  does  not  address the
    range  of other administrative duties related to  tracking the
    PRP.  The site report is designed to provide PRP information
    linked by the associated site, which appears according to the
    state  where the site is located.
    Specifications:  Also available in set of 6  reports  PC E99/
    MF E99, PB91-170696. Supersedes PB91-130807.  See also
    PB91-170712 and PB91-170738. 167p.
    Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste dis-
     posal Superfund, Notification procedures, Directories,  Michi-
     gan, Site Enforcement Tracking System, Potentially responsi-
     ble parties.
0684  Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
  Listing by Site for Minnesota
  Order Number PB90-243171CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Waste Programs Enforcement; 2 Aug 90
  When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
  hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
  ity Act)  site, EPA must conduct  a search to identify parties
  with potential financial  responsibility  for remediation of un-
  controlled hazardous waste  sites. EPA regional Superfund
  Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to thepoten-
  tially responsible party (PRP). Data from this  notice letter is
  used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETb).
  The data includes PRP name and address  a ^pany con-
  tact person, the date the notice  was issued  and the related
  CERCLA site  name and  identification number  SETSi was
  created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National  Pn-
  oW  List) and  non-NPL sites. SETS  does not address  he
   range of other administrative duties related to tracking  the
   PRP These lists (updated quarterly) represent EPAs prelimi-
   nary'findings on the identities of Potentially responsible par-
   ties Inclusion on these lists does not constitute a f.nalI  deter-
   mination concerning the liability of any party for the hazard or
   contamination  at any CERCLA site  The site.report  is^de-
   signed to provide PRP information linked by the associated
   site, which appears according to Minnesota where the  site is
   located.
   Specifications: Also available in set of 6 reports PC E99/
   MF E99, PB90-243130.  See also PB90-243163 and  PB90-
   243189. 56p.
   Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Minnesota
   Waste disposal, Coordinated procurement, Directories^Site
   Enforcement  Tracking System,  Superfund, Remedial  action.

  0685  Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
    Listing by Site for Minnesota
    Order Number PB91 -130815CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
    Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
    Waste Programs Enforcement; 19 Dec 90
    When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA^Compre-
    hensive Environmental Response, Compensation  and Liabil-
    ity Act) site,  EPA must conduct a search to identify  parties
    with potential financial  responsibility  for remediation of un-
    controlled  hazardous waste sites.  EPA  regional Superfund
    Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the: poten-
    tially responsible party (PRP) for the state of M.nnesota. Data
    from this notice letter is used  to form the Site Enfoi^rnent
    Tracking System (SETS). This data includes PRP name and
    address a company contact person, the date the no  ice was
    fssued, knd the related CERCLA site name  and 'dentification
    number. SETS was  created to track PRP 'dent, icatior, at
    both  NPL (National Priority List) and non-NPL sites SETS
    does not address the range of other administrative duties re-
    lated to tracking the PRP.
    Specifications: Also available in set of 6  reports PC E99/
     MFE99PB91-130773. Supersedes  PB90-243171. See also
     PB91-130807 and PB91-130823. 55p.
     Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Minnesota,
     Waste disposal, Coordinated  procurement  Directories  Site
     Enforcement Tracking  System, Superfund, Remedial action,
     Potentially responsible  parties.
    120

-------
                                                                     PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Enforcement
 0686  Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)- PRP
   Listing by Site for Minnesota
   Order Number PB91-170738CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
   Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
   Waste Programs Enforcement; 5 Apr 91
   When expending Superfund monies  at a CERCLA (Compre-
   hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and  Liabil-
   ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
   with potential  financial responsibility for remediation of un-
   controlled  hazardous  waste  sites. EPA  regional Superfund
   Waste Management Staff issued a notice letter to the poten-
   tially responsible party (PRP)., Data from this notice letter is
   used to form the Site  Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)
   This data includes  PRP name and address, a company con-
   tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
   CERCLA site  name  and identification number. SETS was
   created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
   ority List) and non-NPL  sites. SETS does not address the
   range of other administrative  duties related to tracking the
   PRP. The site  report is designed to provide PRP information
   linked by the associated site, which appears according to the
   state where the site is  located.
   Specifications: Also  available in  set of 6 reports PC  E99/
   MF E99, PB91-170696. Supersedes PB91-130815  See also
   PB91-170720 and PB91-170746. 57p.
  Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste dis-
  posal, Superfund, Notification procedures, Directories, Minne-
  sota, Site Enforcement Tracking System,  Potentially  respon-
  sible parties.

0687 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
  Listing by Site for  Mississippi
  Order Number PB90-243098CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
  Environmental Protection  Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Waste Programs Enforcement; 2 Aug 90
  When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
  hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
  ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
  with potential financial responsibility  for remediation of un-
  controlled hazardous  waste sites.  EPA  regional Superfund
  Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
  tially responsible party  (PRP). Data from this notice letter is
  used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
  The data includes PRP name and address, a company  con-
  tact person, the date the  notice was issued, and the  related
  CERCLA site name and identification  number. SETS  was
  created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
  ority List) and non-NPL sites.  SETS  does not address the
  range of other  administrative duties related to tracking the
  PRP. These  lists (updated quarterly) represent EPA's prelimi-
  nary findings on the identities of potentially responsible  par-
  ties. Inclusion on these lists does not constitute a final deter-
  mination concerning  the liability  of any party for the hazard or
  contamination at any CERCLA site. The  site report is  de-
  signed to provide PRP  information linked by the associated
  site, which appears according to Mississippi where the site is
  located.
  Specifications:  Also available in set  of 8 reports PC E99/
  MF E99,  PB90-243049. See also PB90-243080 and  PB90-
 243106. 16p.
 Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Mississippi,
 Waste  disposal, Coordinated procurement, Directories,  Site
 Enforcement Tracking System,  Superfund, Remedial action.
 0688  Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
   Listing by Site for Mississippi
   Order Number PB91-130732CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
   Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
   Waste Programs Enforcement; 19 Dec 90
   When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
   hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and  Liabil-
   ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
   with potential  financial responsibility for remediation of un-
   controlled  hazardous  waste  sites. EPA regional Superfund
   Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
   tially  responsible  party (PRP) for the state of Mississippi.
   Data from this notice letter is used to form the Site Enforce-
   ment Tracking System (SETS). This data includes PRP  name
   and address, a company contact person, the date the notice
   was issued, and the related CERCLA site name and identifi-
   cation number. SETS was created to track PRP identification
   at both NPL (National  Priority List) and  non-NPL sites. SETS
   does not address the range of other administrative duties re-
   lated to tracking the PRP.
  Specifications: Also  available in  set of 8 reports PC  E99/
   MF E99,  PB91-130690. Supersedes PB90-243098. See'also
  PB91-130724 and PB91-130740. 8p.
  Subject index keywords:  Hazardous materials, Mississippi,
  Waste disposal, Coordinated procurement,  Directories, Site
  Enforcement Tracking  System, Superfund, Remedial action,
  Potentially responsible  parties.

0689  Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
  Listing by Site for  Mississippi
  Order Number PB91-170654CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Waste Programs Enforcement; 5 Apr 91
  When  expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
  hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
  ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify  parties
  with potential  financial responsibility for remediation of un-
  controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA  regional Superfund
  Waste Management Staff issued a notice letter to the poten-
  tially responsible party  (PRP). Data from this notice letter is
  used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking  System (SETS).
  This data includes PRP name and address, a company  con-
  tact person,  the date the  notice was issued, and the  related
  CERCLA site  name and identification  number. SETS  was
  created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
  ority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS does not address the
  range of other  administrative  duties related to tracking the
  PRP. The site report is designed to provide PRP information
  linked by the associated site, which appears according to the
  state where the site is located.
  Specifications: Also available in  set of 8 reports PC E99/
  MF E99,  PB91-170605. Supersedes PB91-130732. See  also
  PB91-170647 and PB91-170662. 10p.
  Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste dis-
  posal, Superfund, Notification procedures, Directories, Missis-
  sippi, Site  Enforcement Tracking System, Potentially respon-
  sible parties.
                                                                                                              121

-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Enforcement
0690  Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
  Listing by Site for Missouri
  Order Number PB90-243296CDH, price: PC A07/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Waste Programs Enforcement; 2 Aug 90
  When expending Superfund monies at  a CERCLA (Compre-
  hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
  ity Act)  site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
  with potential financial  responsibility for remediation of un-
  controlled hazardous waste  sites. EPA regional Superfund
  Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
  tially responsible party (PRP). Data from this  notice letter is
  used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
  The data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
  tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
  CERCLA site name  and identification number.  SETS  was
  created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
  ority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS does  not  address the
  range of other administrative duties related to  tracking the
  PRP. These lists (updated quarterly) represent EPA's prelimi-
  nary findings on  the identities of potentially responsible par-
  ties. Inclusion on these lists does  not constitute a final deter-
  mination concerning the liability of any party for the hazard or
  contamination at any CERCLA site. The site report is de-
  signed to provide PRP information linked by  the associated
  site, which appears according to Missouri where the site is
  located.
  Specifications: Also available in set of 4  reports PC E99/
  MF E99, PB90-243262. See also PB90-243288 and PB90-
  243304. 141 p.
  Subject Index keywords:  Hazardous materials, Waste dis-
  posal, Missouri,  Coordinated procurement, Directories, Site
  Enforcement Tracking System, Superfund,  Remedial action.

 0691  Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
  Listing by Site for Missouri
  Order Number PB91-130989CDH, price: PC A07/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Waste Programs Enforcement; 19 Dec 90
  When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
  hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
  ity Act) site, EPA must conduct  a search to identify parties
  with  potential financial  responsibility for remediation of un-
   controlled  hazardous waste  sites. EPA  regional Superfund
  Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
  tially responsible party (PRP) for the state of Missouri. Data
   from this notice letter is used to form the Site Enforcement
  Tracking System (SETS). This data includes  PRP name and
   address, a company contact person, the  date the notice was
   issued, and the  related CERCLA site name and identification
   number. SETS  was created to  track PRP  identification at
   both NPL (National Priority List)  and non-NPL sites. SETS
   does not address the range of other administrative duties re-
   lated to tracking the PRP.
   Specifications: Also available in set of 4 reports PC E99/
   MF E99, PB91-130955. Supersedes PB90-243296. See also
   PB91-130971 and PB91-130997. 139p.
   Subject  index  keywords: Hazardous  materials, Missouri,
   Waste disposal, Coordinated  procurement, Directories, Site
   Enforcement Tracking System, Superfund, Remedial action,
   Potentially responsible parties.
0692  Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
  Listing by Site for Missouri
  Order Number PB91-170852CDH, price: PC A08/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Waste Programs Enforcement; 5 Apr 91
  When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
  hensive Environmental Response, Compensation  and Liabil-
  ity Act)  site, EPA must  conduct a  search to identify parties
  with  potential financial  responsibility for remediation of un-
  controlled hazardous waste sites.  EPA regional  Superfund
  Waste Management Staff issued a  notice letter to the poten-
  tially responsible party (PRP). Data from this notice letter  is
  used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
  This data includes PRP  name and  address, a company con-
  tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
  CERCLA site name  and  identification number. SETS was
  created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
  ority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS does  not address the
  range of other administrative duties related to tracking the
  PRP. The site report is  designed to provide PRP information
  linked by the associated site, which appears according to the
  state where the site is located.
  Specifications: Also available in set of 4 reports PC E99/
  MF E99, PB91-170829. Supersedes PB91-130989. See also
  PB91-170845 and PB91-170860. 165p.
  Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials,  Waste dis-
  posal, Superfund, Notification procedures,  Directories, Mis-
  souri, Site Enforcement Tracking System, Potentially respon-
  sible parties.
 0693  Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
  Listing by Site for Montana
  Order Number PB90-243338CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Waste Programs Enforcement; 2 Aug 90
  When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
  hensive Environmental  Response, Compensation and Liabil-
  ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
  with  potential  financial responsibility for remediation of  un-
  controlled  hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
  Waste  Management Staff  issue a  notice letter to the poten-
  tially responsible party  (PRP). Data from this notice letter is
  used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
  The data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
  tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
   CERCLA site name and  identification  number.  SETS was
   created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
   ority List)  and  non-NPL sites. SETS does  not address  the
   range of other administrative duties related to tracking  the
   PRP. These lists (updated quarterly) represent EPA's prelimi-
   nary findings on  the identities of potentially responsible par-
   ties. Inclusion on these lists does not constitute a final deter-
   mination concerning the liability of any party for the hazard or
   contamination at any  CERCLA site. The  site report is  de-
   signed to  provide PRP information linked by the associated
   site, which appears according to  Montana where the site is
   located.
   Specifications: Also available in  set of 6 reports PC E99/
   MF E99] RB90-243312. See also PB90-243320 and PB90-
   243346. 13p.
   Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste  dis-
   posal,  Montana, Coordinated procurement, Directories,  Site
   Enforcement Tracking  System,  Superfund,  Remedial action.
  122

-------
                                                                     PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Enforcement
 0694  Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
   Listing by Site for Montana
   Order Number PB91-131029CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
   Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
   Waste Programs Enforcement; 19 Dec 90
   When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
   hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and  Liabil-
   ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
   with potential  financial  responsibility for  remediation  of un-
   controlled  hazardous waste  sites. EPA  regional Superfund
   Waste Management Staff issue a notice  letter to the  poten-
   tially responsible party (PRP) for the state of Montana. Data
   from this notice letter is used to form the Site Enforcement
   Tracking System (SETS). This data includes PRP name and
   address, a  company contact person, the date the notice was
   issued, and the related CERCLA site name and identification
   number.  SETS was created to  track PRP identification at
   both NPL (National  Priority List) and  non-NPL sites.  SETS
   does not address the range of other administrative duties re-
   lated to tracking the PRP.
   Specifications: Also  available in  set of 6 reports PC  E99/
   MF E99, PB91-131003.  Supersedes PB90-243338. See also
   PB91-131011 andPB91-131037. 13p.
  Subject  index keywords:  Hazardous materials,  Montana,
  Waste disposal, Coordinated procurement, Directories, Site
  Enforcement Tracking System, Superfund, Remedial action,
  Potentially responsible parties.

0695  Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
  Listing by Site for Montana
  Order Number PB91-170894CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Waste Programs Enforcement; 5 Apr 91
  When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
  hensive  Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
  ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
  with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
  controlled hazardous  waste sites.  EPA regional  Superfund
  Waste Management Staff issued a notice letter to the poten-
  tially responsible party (PRP). Data from this notice letter is
  used to form the Site  Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
  This data includes  PRP name and address, a company con-
  tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
  CERCLA  site name  and identification  number.  SETS  was
  created to track PRP identification at both  NPL (National Pri-
  ority List) and  non-NPL  sites. SETS does not address the
  range  of other  administrative duties related to tracking the
  PRP. The site report is designed to provide PRP information
  linked by the associated site, which appears according to the
  state where  the site is  located.
  Specifications: Also  available in  set of 6 reports PC  E99/
  MF E99, PB91-170878. Supersedes PB91-131029. See  also
  PB91 -170886 and PB91 -170902. 15p.
  Subject index  keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste dis-
  posal,  Superfund, Notification  procedures, Directories,  Mon-
  tana, Site Enforcement Tracking System, Potentially respon-
  sible parties.
 0696  Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
   Listing by Site for Nebraska
   Order Number PB90-243304CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
   Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
   Waste Programs Enforcement; 2 Aug 90
   When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
   hensive  Environmental Response, Compensation and  Liabil-
   ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to  identify parties
   with potential  financial responsibility for  remediation of un-
   controlled  hazardous  waste  sites. EPA  regional Superfund
   Waste Management Staff issue a notice  letter to the poten-
   tially responsible party (PRP). Data from  this  notice letter is
   used to form the Site  Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
   The data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
   tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
   CERCLA site  name  and identification number.  SETS was
   created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
   ority List) and non-NPL  sites. SETS does  not address the
   range of other administrative duties  related to tracking the
   PRP. These lists (updated quarterly) represent EPA's prelimi-
   nary findings on the identities of potentially responsible par-
   ties. Inclusion on these lists does not constitute a final deter-
   mination concerning the liability of any party for the hazard or
   contamination  at any  CERCLA site.  The site  report is de-
   signed to provide  PRP information linked by the associated
   site, which  appears according to Nebraska where the site is
   located.
   Specifications: Also available in  set of 4 reports PC  E99/
   MF E99,  PB90-243262. See also PB90-243296. 10p.
  Subject index keywords:  Hazardous materials, Waste dis-
  posal, Nebraska, Coordinated procurement, Directories, Site
  Enforcement Tracking  System, Superfund, Remedial action.

0697 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
  Listing by Site for Nebraska
  Order Number PB91-130997CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
  Environmental Protection  Agency, Washington,  DC. Office of
  Waste Programs Enforcement; 19 Dec 90
  When  expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
  hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
  ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
  with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
  controlled hazardous waste sites.  EPA regional  Superfund
  Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
  tially responsible party (PRP) for the state  of Nebraska.  Data
  from this  notice letter is used to form the Site  Enforcement
  Tracking System (SETS).  This data includes PRP name and
  address, a company contact person, the date the notice was
  issued, and  the related CERCLA site name and identification
  number.  SETS  was created to track  PRP  identification at
  both NPL (National Priority List)  and non-NPL sites. SETS
  does not address the range of other administrative duties re-
  lated to tracking the PRP.
  Specifications: Also available in set of 4 reports PC E99/
  MF E99, PB91-130955. Supersedes PB90-243304, See also
  PB91-130989. 8p.
  Subject  index  keywords:  Hazardous  materials, Nebraska,
  Waste  disposal, Coordinated procurement, Directories,  Site
  Enforcement Tracking System, Superfund, Remedial  action,
  Potentially responsible parties.
                                                                                                              123

-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Enforcement
0698  Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
  Listing by Site for Nebraska
  Order Number PB91-170860CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Waste Programs Enforcement; 5 Apr 91
  When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
  hensive Environmental Response, Compensation  and Liabil-
  ity Act) site, EPA must  conduct a  search to identify parties
  with potential financial  responsibility for remediation of un-
  controlled  hazardous waste sites.  EPA regional  Superfund
  Waste Management Staff issued a  notice letter to the poten-
  tially responsible party (PRP). Data from this notice letter  is
  used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
  This data includes PRP  name and  address, a company con-
  tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
  CERCLA site name  and  identification number. SETS was
  created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
  ority List)  and non-NPL sites. SETS does  not address the
  range of other administrative duties related to tracking the
  PRP, The  site report is  designed to provide PRP information
  linked by the associated site, which appears according to the
  state where the site is located.
  Specifications: Also available in set of 4 reports PC E99/
  MF E99, PB91-170829.  Supersedes PB91-130997. See also
  PB91-170852. 10p.
  Subject Index keywords: Hazardous materials,  Waste dis-
  posal, Superfund, Notification procedures, Directories, Ne-
  braska,  Site Enforcement  Tracking  System,  Potentially re-
  sponsible parties.
0699 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
  Listing by Site for Nevada
  Order Number PB90-243429CDH, price: PC A01/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Waste Programs Enforcement; 2 Aug 90
  When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
  hensive Environmental  Response,  Compensation and Liabil-
  ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search  to identify parties
  with potential financial  responsibility for remediation of un-
  controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
  Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
  tially responsible party  (PRP). Data from this notice letter is
  used  to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
  The data includes PRP name and  address, a company con-
  tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
  CERCLA  site  name and identification number.  SETS was
  created to track PRP identification  at both  NPL (National Pri-
  ority  List) and non-NPL sites. SETS does not address the
  range of other administrative duties related to tracking the
  PRP. These lists (updated quarterly) represent EPA's prelimi-
  nary findings on the identities of potentially responsible par-
  ties. Inclusion on these  lists does not constitute a final deter-
  mination concerning the liability of any party for the hazard or
  contamination at any CERCLA site. The  site report is de-
  signed to provide PRP  information linked  by the associated
  site, which appears according to Nevada where the site is  lo-
  cated.
  Specifications: Also available in set of 6 reports  PC E99/
  MF E99,  PB90-243387. See also PB90-243411  and PB90-
  243437. 5p.
  Subject index  keywords: Hazardous materials,   Nevada,
  Waste disposal, Coordinated procurement, Directories, Site
  Enforcement Tracking  System, Superfund, Remedial action.
0700  Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
  Listing by Site for Nevada
  Order Number PB91-131110CDH, price: PC A01/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Waste Programs Enforcement; 19 Dec 90
  When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
  hensive Environmental Response, Compensation  and Liabil-
  ity Act) site, EPA must  conduct a  search to identify parties
  with  potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
  controlled hazardous waste sites.  EPA regional  Superfund
  Waste Management Staff  issue a notice letter to  the poten-
  tially responsible party (PRP) for the state of Nevada.  Data
  from this notice letter is used to form the Site Enforcement
  Tracking  System (SETS). This data includes PRP name and
  address,  a company contact person, the date the  notice was
  issued, and the related CERCLA site name and identification
  number.  SETS was created  to track PRP identification at
  both NPL (National  Priority  List) and non-NPL sites. SETS
  does not address the range of other administrative duties re-
  lated to tracking the  PRP.
  Specifications:  Also available in set of 6 reports PC  E99/
  MF E99, PB91-131078. Supersedes PB90-243429. See also
  PB91-131102 and PB91-131128. 4p.
  Subject  index  keywords:  Hazardous materials,  Nevada,
  Waste disposal,  Coordinated procurement,  Directories, Site
  Enforcement Tracking System,  Superfund, Remedial action,
  Potentially responsible parties.
0701   Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
  Listing by Site for Nevada
  Order Number PB91-170985CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Waste Programs Enforcement; 5 Apr 91
  When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
  hensive Environmental Response,  Compensation and Liabil-
  ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a  search to identify parties
  with potential financial  responsibility for remediation of un-
  controlled hazardous waste  sites.  EPA regional Superfund
  Waste Management Staff issued a  notice letter to the poten-
  tially responsible party (PRP). Data from this notice letter is
  used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
  This data includes PRP name and  address, a company con-
  tact person, the  date the  notice was issued, and  the related
  CERCLA site name and identification number.  SETS was
  created to track  PRP identification  at both NPL (National Pri-
  ority  List) and non-NPL sites. SETS does not address the
  range of other  administrative duties related to tracking the
  PRP. The site report is designed to provide PRP  information
  linked by the associated site, which appears according to the
  state where the site is located.
  Specifications: Also available  in  set of 6 reports PC E99/
  MF E99, PB91-170944. Supersedes PB91-131110. See also
  PB91-170977 and PB91-170993. 7p.
  Subject index  keywords: Hazardous materials,  Waste dis-
  posal,   Superfund,   Notification   procedures,   Directories,
  Nevada, Site Enforcement Tracking System, Potentially re-
  sponsible parties.
 124

-------
                                                                     PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Enforcement
 0702  Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
   Listing by Site for New Hampshire
   Order Number PB90-242918CDH, price: PC A06/MF A01
   Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
   Waste Programs Enforcement; 2 Aug 90
   When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
   hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and  Liabil-
   ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
   with potential  financial responsibility for  remediation  of un-
   controlled  hazardous  waste  sites. EPA  regional Superfund
   Waste Management Staff issue a notice  letter to the  poten-
   tially responsible party (PRP). Data from  this notice letter is
   used to form the Site  Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
   The data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
   tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
   CERCLA site  name  and identification number. SETS was
   created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
   ority List) and non-NPL  sites. SETS does  not address the
   range of other administrative duties related to tracking the
   PRP. These lists (updated quarterly) represent EPA's prelimi-
   nary findings on the identities of potentially responsible par-
   ties. Inclusion on these lists does not constitute a final deter-
   mination concerning the liability of any party for the hazard or
   contamination  at any  CERCLA site. The site report  is de-
   signed to provide  PRP information linked by the associated
   site, which  appears according to New Hampshire where the
   site is located.
   Specifications: Also  available in  set of 6 reports PC  E99/
   MF E99, PB90-242876. See  also PB90-242900 and PB90-
  242926. 109p.
  Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, New Hamp-
  shire, Waste disposal,  Coordinated procurement,  Directories,
  Site  Enforcement Tracking  System,  Superfund, Remedial
  action.

0703  Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
  Listing by Site for New Hampshire
  Order Number PB91-130567CDH, price: PC A06/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Waste Programs Enforcement; 19 Dec 90
  When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
  hensive  Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
  ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
  with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
  controlled hazardous  waste  sites. EPA regional Superfund
  Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
  tially responsible party (PRP) for  the state of New Hamp-
  shire. Data from this notice letter is used to form the  Site En-
  forcement Tracking System (SETS). This data includes  PRP
  name and address, a company contact person, the date the
  notice was issued, and the related CERCLA site name and
  identification number. SETS was created to track PRP identi-
  fication at both NPL  (National  Priority List) and non-NPL
  sites. SETS  does not address the range of other  administra-
  tive duties related to tracking the PRP.
  Specifications: Also available in set of 6 reports PC  E99/
  MF E99,  PB91-130526. Supersedes PB90-242918. See  also
  PB91-130559 and PB91-130575. 109p.
  Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, New Hamp-
  shire, Waste disposal,  Coordinated procurement, Directories,
  Site Enforcement  Tracking System,  Superfund,  Remedial
  action, Potentially responsible parties.
 0704  Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
   Listing by Site for New Hampshire
   Order Number PB91-170472CDH, price: PC A06/MF A01
   Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
   Waste Programs Enforcement; 5 Apr 91
   When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
   hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
   ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search  to identify parties
   with potential  financial  responsibility for remediation  of un-
   controlled hazardous waste  sites. EPA regional Superfund
   Waste Management Staff issued a notice letter to the  poten-
   tially responsible party (PRP). Data from this notice letter is
   used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
   This data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
   tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
   CERCLA site  name  and identification number. SETS was
   created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
   ority List)  and non-NPL  sites. SETS does not address the
   range of other administrative  duties related to tracking the
   PRP. The site  report is designed to provide PRP information
   linked by the associated site, which appears according to the
   state where the site is located.
   Specifications: Also  available in  set of 6 reports PC E99/
   MF E99, PB91-170431. Supersedes PB91-130567. See also
   PB91-130559 and PB91-170480. 109p.
  Subject index keywords:  Hazardous materials, Waste dis-
  posal, Superfund, Notification  procedures,  Directories, New
  Hampshire, Site  Enforcement Tracking  System,  Potentially
  responsible parties.

0705  Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
  Listing by Site for New Jersey
  Order Number PB90-242959CDH, price: PC A07/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Waste Programs Enforcement; 2 Aug 90
  When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
  hensive  Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
  ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
  with potential  financial responsibility for  remediation of un-
  controlled hazardous  waste sites.  EPA regional Superfund
  Waste Management Staff issue a  notice letter to the poten-
  tially responsible party (PRP). Data from  this notice letter is
  used to form the Site  Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
  The data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
  tact person, the date the  notice was issued, and the related
  CERCLA site  name  and identification number.  SETS was
  created to track PRP identification  at both NPL (National Pri-
  ority List) and  non-NPL  sites.  SETS does  not  address the
  range  of other  administrative  duties related to  tracking the
  PRP. These lists (updated quarterly) represent EPA's prelimi-
  nary findings on the identities of potentially responsible par-
  ties. Inclusion on these lists does not constitute a final deter-
  mination concerning the liability of any party for the hazard or
  contamination at  any  CERCLA  site. The site report is de-
  signed to provide PRP information linked by the associated
  site, which appears according  to New Jersey where  the site
  is located.
  Specifications: Also  available in set of 3 reports PC  E99/
  MF E99, PB90-242942. See also  PB90-242942 and PB90-
  242967. 128p.
  Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, New Jersey,
  Coordinated procurement, Directories, Waste disposal, Site
  Enforcement Tracking  System,  Remedial  action, Superfund.
                                                                                                              125

-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Enforcement
0706  Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
  Listing by Site for New Jersey
  Order Number PB91-130609CDH, price: PC A07/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Waste Programs Enforcement; 19 Dec 90
  When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
  hensive Environmental Response, Compensation  and Liabil-
  ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a  search to identify parties
  with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
  controlled  hazardous waste sites.  EPA regional  Superfund
  Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to  the poten-
  tially responsible party (PRP) for the state of New Jersey.
  Data from  this notice letter is used  to form the Site  Enforce-
  ment Tracking System  (SETS). This data includes  PRP name
  and address, a company contact person, the date the 'notice
  was issued, and the related CERCLA site name and identifi-
  cation number. SETS was created to track PRP identification
  at both NPL (National Priority List)  and non-NPL sites. SETS
  does not address the range of other administrative duties re-
  lated to tracking the PRP.
  Specifications: Also available in set of 3  reports PC  E99/
  MF E99, PB91-130591. Supersedes PB90-242959. See also
  PB91-130617. 126p.
  Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, New Jersey,
  Waste disposal,  Coordinated procurement,  Directories, Site
  Enforcement Tracking  System, Superfund,  Remedial action,
  Potentially responsible parties.

0707  Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
  Listing by Site for New Jersey
  Order Number PB91-170514CDH, price: PC A07/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Waste Programs  Enforcement; 5 Apr 91
  When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
  hensive Environmental Response,  Compensation  and Liabil-
  ity Act)  site, EPA must conduct a  search to identify parties
  with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
  controlled  hazardous waste sites.  EPA regional  Superfund
  Waste Management Staff issued a  notice letter to the poten-
  tially responsible party (PRP). Data from this notice letter  is
  used to form the Site Enforcement  Tracking System (SETS).
  This data includes PRP name and  address, a  company con-
  tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
  CERCLA site name and  identification number. SETS was
  created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
  ority List)  and non-NPL sites. SETS does  not address the
  range of other administrative duties related to tracking the
  PRP. The  site report is designed to provide PRP information
  linked by the associated site, which appears according to the
  state where the site is located.
  Specifications: Also available in set of 3  reports PC  E99/
  MF E99, PB91-170506. Supersedes PB91-130609. See also
  PB91-170522. 128p.
  Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste dis-
  posal, Superfund, Notification procedures,  Directories, New
  Jersey,  Site Enforcement Tracking System,  Potentially re-
  sponsible parties.
0708  Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
  Listing by Site for New Mexico
  Order Number PB90-243239CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Waste Programs Enforcement; 2 Aug 90
  When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
  hensive  Environmental Response, Compensation  and Liabil-
  ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
  with  potential financial responsibility for remediation  of  un-
  controlled  hazardous waste sites. EPA  regional  Superfund
  Waste Management  Staff issue a notice letter to  the poten-
  tially responsible party (PRP). Data from this notice letter is
  used ,to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
  The data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
  tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
  CERCLA site name  and identification number.  SETS was
  created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National  Pri-
  ority List)  and  non-NPL sites.  SETS  does not  address  the
  range of other administrative duties related to  tracking  the
  PRP. These lists  (updated quarterly) represent EPA's prelimi-
  nary findings on the identities of potentially responsible par-
  ties. Inclusion on these lists does not constitute a final deter-
  mination concerning the liability of any party for the hazard or
  contamination at any CERCLA site. The site report is  de-
  signed to  provide PRP information linked by the  associated
  site, which appears according to  New Mexico where the  site
  is located.
  Specifications: Also available in set of 5  reports PC E99/
  MF E99, PB90-243205. See also PB90-243221  and PB90-
  243247. 9p.
  Subject   index   keywords:   Hazardous   materials,  New
  Mexico,  Waste disposal, Coordinated  procurement, Directo-
  ries, Site Enforcement Tracking System, Superfund, Remedi-
  al action.

0709  Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
  Listing by Site for New Mexico
  Order Number PB91-130922CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Waste Programs  Enforcement;  19 Dec  90
  When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
  hensive  Environmental Response, Compensation  and  Liabil-
  ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify  parties
  with  potential financial responsibility for remediation of  un-
  controlled  hazardous waste sites.  EPA regional  Superfund
  Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to  the poten-
  tially responsible party (PRP) for the state of New Mexico.
  Data from this notice letter is used to form the Site Enforce-
  ment Tracking System (SETS). This data includes  PRP name
  and address, a company contact person, the date the notice
  was issued, and  the related CERCLA site name and identifi-
  cation number. SETS was created to track  PRP identification
  at both NPL (National Priority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS
  does not address the range of other administrative duties re-
  lated to tracking the  PRP.
  Specifications: Also available in set of 5 reports PC E99/
  MF E99, PB91-130898. Supersedes PB90-243239. See also
  PB91-130914 and PB91-130930. 8p.
  Subject   index   keywords:  Hazardous   materials,   New
  Mexico,  Waste disposal, Coordinated  procurement, Directo-
  ries, Site Enforcement Tracking System,  Superfund, Remedi-
  al action, Potentially  responsible parties.
126

-------
                                                                     PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Enforcement
 0710  Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
   Listing by Site for New Mexico
   Order Number PB91-170795CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
   Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
   Waste Programs Enforcement; 5 Apr 91
   When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
   hensive Environmental  Response, Compensation and Liabil-
   ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search  to identify parties
   with potential  financial  responsibility for remediation of  un-
   controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
   Waste Management Staff issued a notice letter to the poten-
   tially responsible party (PRP).  Data from this notice letter is
   used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
   This data includes PRP name  and address, a company con-
   tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
   CERCLA site  name  and identification number. SETS was
   created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
   ority List)  and non-NPL sites. SETS does not address the
   range of other administrative  duties related  to tracking the
   PRP. The site  report is  designed to provide PRP information
   linked by the associated site, which appears according to the
  state where the site is located.
  Specifications: Also  available in set of 5 reports PC E99/
  MF E99, PB91-170761.  Supersedes PB91-130922. See also
  PB91-170787 and PB91-170803. 9p.
  Subject index keywords:  Hazardous materials, Waste dis-
  posal, Superfund, Notification  procedures, Directories,  New
  Mexico, Site Enforcement  Tracking System, Potentially  re-
  sponsible parties.

0711  Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
  Listing by Site for New York
  Order Number PB90-242967CDH,  price: PC A03/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Waste Programs Enforcement;  2 Aug 90
  When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
  hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
  ity Act) site,  EPA must  conduct a search to identify parties
  with potential financial responsibility for remediation of  un-
  controlled  hazardous  waste sites. EPA regional  Superfund
  Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
  tially responsible party (PRP). Data from this notice letter is
  used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
  The data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
  tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
  CERCLA site  name  and identification number. SETS  was
  created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
  ority List) and  non-NPL sites.  SETS does not  address the
  range of other administrative duties related to  tracking the
  PRP. These lists (updated quarterly) represent EPA's prelimi-
  nary findings on the identities of potentially responsible par-
  ties. Inclusion on these lists does not constitute a final deter-
  mination concerning the liability of any party for the hazard or
  contamination  at  any CERCLA site. The site report is de-
  signed to provide PRP information linked by the associated
  site, which  appears according to New York  where the site is
  located.
  Specifications: Also available  in set of 3 reports  PC E99/
  MF E99, PB90-242942.  See also PB90-242959 and PB90-
  242975. 33p.
  Subject index  keywords: Hazardous materials, New York,
  Coordinated procurement, Directories, Waste disposal, Site
  Enforcement Tracking System,  Remedial action, Superfund.
 0712  Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
   Listing by Site for New York
   Order Number PB91-130617CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
   Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
   Waste Programs Enforcement; 19 Dec 90
   When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
   hensive  Environmental Response, Compensation and  Liabil-
   ity Act) site,  EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
   with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
   controlled  hazardous  waste  sites.  EPA regional Superfund
   Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
   tially responsible party (PRP) for the state of New York. Data
   from this notice letter is used to form the Site Enforcement
   Tracking System (SETS). This data includes PRP name and
   address, a  company contact person, the date the notice was
   issued, and the related CERCLA site name and identification
   number.  SETS was created to track  PRP identification  at
   both NPL  (National Priority List)  and non-NPL sites.  SETS
   does not address the range of other administrative duties re-
   lated to tracking the PRP.
   Specifications: Also available in set of 3  reports PC E99/
   MF E99, PB91-130591. Supersedes PB90-242967. See also
   PB91-130609 and PB91-130625. 30p.
   Subject  index keywords: Hazardous materials,  New York,
   Waste disposal,  Coordinated procurement, Directories, Site
   Enforcement  Tracking System,  Superfund,  Remedial action,
   Potentially responsible parties.

0713 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
   Listing by Site for New York
   Order Number PB91-170522CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
   Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
   Waste Programs Enforcement; 5 Apr 91
  When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
   hensive  Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
   ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search  to identify parties
  with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
  controlled hazardous waste sites.  EPA regional  Superfund
  Waste Management Staff issued a notice letter to the poten-
  tially responsible  party (PRP). Data from this notice  letter is
  used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
  This data includes PRP name and address, a company  con-
  tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
  CERCLA site name and identification  number. SETS  was
  created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
  ority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS does  not address the
  range, of other administrative duties related to tracking the
  PRP. The site report is designed to provide PRP information
,  linked  by the associated site, which appears according to the
  state where the site is located.
  Specifications: Also available in set of 3 reports  PC  E99/
  MF E99,  PB91-170506. Supersedes  PB91-130617. See  also
  PB91-170514  and PB91-170530. 32p.
  Subject  index keywords:  Hazardous  materials, Waste dis-
  posal,  Superfund, Notification procedures, Directories,  New
  York, Site Enforcement Tracking System, Potentially respon-
  sible parties.
                                                                                                              127

-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Enforcement
0714  Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
  Listing by Site for North Carolina
  Order Number PB90-243106CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Waste Programs Enforcement; 2 Aug 90
  When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
  hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
  ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
  with potential financial  responsibility for remediation of un-
  controlled hazardous waste sites.  EPA regional Superfund
  Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
  tially responsible party (PRP).  Data from this notice letter  is
  used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
  The data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
  tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
  CERCLA site name  and identification number. SETS  was
  created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
  ority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS does not  address the
  range of other administrative  duties related  to  tracking the
  PRP. These lists (updated quarterly) represent EPA's prelimi-
  nary findings  on the identities of potentially responsible par-
  ties. Inclusion on these lists does not constitute a final deter-
  mination concerning the liability of any party for the hazard  or
  contamination at any CERCLA site. The site  report is de-
  signed to provide PRP  information linked by the associated
  site, which appears according to North Carolina where the
  site is located.
  Specifications: Also available in set of 8 reports PC E99/
  MF E99, PB90-243049.  See also PB90-243098 and PB90-
  243114. 31 p.
  Subject Index keywords:  Hazardous materials, North Caro-
  lina, Waste disposal. Coordinated  procurement, Directories,
  Site  Enforcement  Tracking  System,  Superfund,  Remedial
  action.

0715 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
  Listing by Site for North Carolina
  Order Number PB91-130740CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Waste Programs Enforcement; 19 Dec 90
  When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
  hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
  ity Act)  site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
  with potential financial  responsibility for remediation of un-
  controlled hazardous waste  sites. EPA regional Superfund
  Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
  tially responsible party (PRP) for the state of North Carolina.
  Data from this notice letter is used to form the Site Enforce-
  ment Tracking System (SETS). This data includes PRP name
  and address,  a company contact person, the date the notice
  was issued, and the related CERCLA site name and identifi-
  cation number. SETS was created to track PRP identification
  at both NPL (National Priority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS
  does not address the range of other administrative duties re-
  lated to tracking the PRP.
  Specifications: Also available in set of 8 reports PC E99/
  MF E99, PB91-130690. Supersedes PB90-243106. See also
  PB91-130732 and PB91-130757. 29p.
  Subject index keywords:  Hazardous materials, North Caro-
  lina, Waste disposal, Coordinated  procurement, Directories,
  Site  Enforcement Tracking  System, Superfund, Remedial
  action, Potentially responsible parties.
0716  Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
  Listing by Site for North Carolina
  Order Number PB91-170662CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Waste Programs Enforcement; 5 Apr 91
  When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
  hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
  ity Act) site, EPA  must  conduct a  search to identify parties
  with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
  controlled hazardous waste sites.  EPA regional Superfund
  Waste Management  Staff issued a notice letter to the poten-
  tially responsible party (PRP). Data from this notice letter is
  used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
  This data includes PRP  name and address, a company con-
  tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
  CERCLA site name  and identification number. SETS  was
  created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
  ority  List) and  non-NPL  sites. SETS does  not address the
  range of other administrative duties related to tracking the
  PRP. The site report is designed to provide PRP information
  linked by the associated site, which appears according to the
  state where the site is located.
  Specifications: Also available in set of 8 reports PC  E99/
  MF E99, PB91-170605.  Supersedes PB91-130740. See  also
  PB91 -170654 and PB91 -170670. 31 p.
  Subject  index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste dis-
  posal, Superfund,  Notification procedures,  Directories, North
  Carolina, Site Enforcement Tracking System, Potentially re-
  sponsible parties.

0717  Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
  Listing by Site for North Dakota
  Order Number PB90-243346CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Waste Programs Enforcement; 2 Aug 90
  When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
  hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
  ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search  to identify parties
  with  potential financial  responsibility for remediation  of un-
  controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
  Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
  tially responsible party (PRP). Data from this  notice  letter is
  used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System  (SETS).
  The data includes PRP  name and  address, a company  con-
  tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
  CERCLA  site  name and identification number.  SETS  was
  created to track PRP identification at both  NPL (National Pri-
  ority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS does not  address the
  range of other administrative duties related to  tracking the
  PRP.  These lists (updated quarterly) represent EPA's prelimi-
  nary findings on the identities of potentially responsible par-
  ties.  Inclusion on these lists does not constitute a final deter-
  mination concerning the liability of any party for the hazard or
  contamination  at  any CERCLA site. The  site report is de-
  signed to provide PRP  information  linked  by the associated
  site, which appears according to North Dakota where the site
  is located.
  Specifications: Also available in set of 6  reports PC E99/
  MF E99,  PB90-243312.  See also  PB90-243338 and PB90-
  243353. 7p.
  Subject  index  keywords:  Hazardous  materials, Waste dis-
  posal, North Dakota, Coordinated procurement,  Directories,
 128

-------
                                                                     PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Enforcement
   Site Enforcement  Tracking  System, Superfund,  Remedial
   action.

 0718  Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
   Listing by Site for North Dakota
   Order Number PB91-131037CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
   Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
   Waste Programs Enforcement; 19 Dec 90
   When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
   hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
   ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a  search  to identify parties
   with potential  financial  responsibility for remediation of un-
   controlled hazardous waste  sites.  EPA regional Superfund
   Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
   tially responsible party (PRP) for the state of North Dakota.
   Data from this notice letter is used to form the Site Enforce-
   ment Tracking System (SETS). This data includes PRP name
   and address, a company contact person, the date the notice
   was issued, and the related CERCLA site name  and identifi-
   cation number. SETS was created to track  PRP identification
   at both NPL (National Priority List) and non-NPL  sites. SETS
   does not address the range of other administrative duties re-
   lated to tracking the PRP.
  Specifications: Also  available in set of 6  reports  PC E99/
   MF E99, PB91-131003.  Supersedes PB90-243346. See also
  PB91-131029  and PB91-131045. 7p.
  Subject  index  keywords:   Hazardous  materials,   North
  Dakota, Waste disposal, Coordinated procurement, Directo-
  ries, Site Enforcement Tracking System, Superfund, Remedi-
  al action, Potentially responsible parties.

0719  Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
  Listing by Site for North Dakota
  Order Number PB91-170902CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Waste Programs Enforcement; 5 Apr 91
  When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
  hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
  ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
  with potential  financial responsibility  for  remediation  of  un-
  controlled  hazardous  waste sites. EPA  regional Superfund
  Waste Management Staff issued a notice letter to the poten-
  tially responsible party (PRP). Data from  this notice letter is
  used to form the Site  Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
  This data  includes PRP name and address, a company con-
  tact person, the date the notice was issued, and  the related
  CERCLA site  name  and identification number.  SETS  was
  created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
  ority List)  and non-NPL sites. SETS  does  not address the
  range of other administrative duties related to tracking the
  PRP. The site  report is designed to provide PRP  information
  linked by the associated site, which appears according to the
  state where the site is located.
  Specifications: Also available in set of 6 reports PC E99/
  MF E99, PB91-170878. Supersedes PB91-131037. See also
  PB91-170894 and PB91-170910. 8p.
  Subject index  keywords: Hazardous materials,  Waste dis-
  posal, Superfund, Notification  procedures, Directories, North
  Dakota, Site Enforcement Tracking  System,  Potentially  re-
  sponsible parties.
 0720  Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
   Listing by Site for Northern Marianas
   Order Number PB90-243437CDH, price: PC A01/MF A01
   Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
   Waste Programs Enforcement; 2 Aug 90
   When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
   hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
   ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search  to identify parties
   with potential  financial  responsibility for remediation of un-
   controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
   Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
   tially responsible party (PRP).  Data from this notice letter is
   used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
   The data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
   tact person,  the date the notice was  issued, and the related
   CERCLA site  name  and  identification number.  SETS was
   created to track PRP identification at  both NPL (National Pri-
   ority List)  and non-NPL sites. SETS does not address the
   range of other administrative duties  related to tracking the
   PRP. These  lists (updated quarterly) represent EPA's prelimi-
   nary findings on the identities of potentially responsible par-
   ties. Inclusion on these lists does not  constitute a final deter-
   mination concerning the liability of any party for the hazard or
   contamination  at any CERCLA site.  The site report is de-
   signed to provide PRP information linked by the associated
   site, which appears  according to Northern Mariana Islands
  where the site is located.
  Specifications: Also  available in  set of 6 reports PC E99/
   MF E99, PB90-243387. See also  PB90-243429 and PB90-
  243445. 5p.
  Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials,  Mariana  Is-
  lands, Waste disposal, Coordinated procurement, Directories,
  Site Enforcement Tracking  System, Superfund,  Remedial
  action.

0721  Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
  Listing by Site for Northern Marianas
  Order Number PB91-131128CDH, price:  PC A01/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Waste Programs Enforcement; 19 Dec 90
  When  expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
  hensive  Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
  ity Act) site,  EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
  with potential financial responsibility for remediation  of un-
  controlled  hazardous  waste  sites.  EPA regional  Superfund
  Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
  tially responsible party (PRP) for the Northern Mariana Is-
  lands.  Data from this notice letter  is  used to form the Site
  Enforcement  Tracking System (SETS). This data includes
  PRP name and address, a company contact person, the date
  the  notice  was issued, and the related CERCLA site name
  and identification number.  SETS  was created to track PRP
  identification at both NPL (National Priority List) and non-NPL
  sites. SETS does not address the range of other administra-
  tive duties related to tracking the PRP.
  Specifications: Also available in set  of 6 reports  PC E99/
  MF E99, PB91-131078. Supersedes PB90-243437. See also
  PB91-131110 and PB91-131136. 4p.
  Subject  index  keywords:  Hazardous materials, Mariana Is-
  lands, Waste  disposal, Coordinated procurement,  Directories,
  Site Enforcement  Tracking System,  Superfund,  Remedial
  action, Potentially responsible parties.
                                                                                                              129

-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Enforcement
0722  Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
  Listing by Site for Northern Marianas
  Order Number PB91-170993CDH, price: PC A01/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Waste Programs Enforcement; 5 Apr 91
  When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
  hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
  ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a  search to identify parties
  with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
  controlled hazardous waste sites.  EPA regional Superfund
  Waste Management Staff issued a notice letter to the poten-
  tially responsible party (PRP). Data from this notice letter  is
  used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
  This data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
  tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
  CERCLA site name  and identification number. SETS  was
  created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
  ority List) and  non-NPL  sites. SETS does  not address the
  range of other administrative duties related to tracking the
  PRP. The site report is designed to provide PRP information
  linked by the associated site, which appears according to the
  state where the site is located.
  Specifications: Also available in set of 6 reports PC  E99/
  MF E99, PB91-170944. Supersedes PB91-131128. See also
  PB91-170985 and PB91-171009. 5p.
  Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste dis-
  posal, Superfund, Notification procedures, Directories,  Mari-
  ana Islands, Site Enforcement Tracking System, Potentially
  responsible parties.

0723  Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
  Listing by Site for Ohio
  Order Number PB90-243189CDH, price: PC A06/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Waste Programs Enforcement; 2 Aug 90
  When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
  hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
  ity Act) site, EPA must conduct  a search to identify parties
  with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
  controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
  Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
  tially responsible party (PRP). Data from this notice letter is
  used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
  The data includes PRP name and  address, a company con-
  tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
  CERCLA  site  name  and identification number.  SETS was
  created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
  ority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS does not  address the
  range of other administrative duties related to  tracking the
  PRP.  These lists (updated quarterly) represent EPA's prelimi-
  nary findings on the  identities of potentially responsible par-
  ties. Inclusion on these lists does not constitute a final deter-
  mination concerning the  liability of any party for the hazard or
  contamination  at any CERCLA site. The site report is de-
  signed to provide PRP information  linked by the associated
  site, which appears according to Ohio where the site is locat-
  ed.
  Specifications: Also available in set of 6  reports PC E99/
  MF E99, PB90-243130. See also  PB90-243171 and PB90-
  243197.  105p.
  Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Ohio, Waste
  disposal, Coordinated procurement, Directories, Site Enforce-
  ment Tracking System, Superfund,  Remedial action.
0724  Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
  Listing by Site for Ohio
  Order Number PB91-130823CDH, price: PC A06/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Waste Programs Enforcement; 19 Dec 90
  When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
  hensive Environmental Response, Compensation  and Liabil-
  ity Act) site, EPA must  conduct a  search to identify  parties
  with  potential financial  responsibility for remediation of un-
  controlled hazardous waste sites.  EPA  regional  Superfund
  Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to  the poten-
  tially responsible party (PRP) for the state of Ohio. Data from
  this notice letter is used to form the Site Enforcement Track-
  ing System (SETS). This data includes PRP name and ad-
  dress, a  company contact person,  the date the notice was
  issued, and the related CERCLA site name and identification
  number.  SETS was created to track PRP identification at
  both NPL (National Priority  List) and  non-NPL sites. SETS
  does not address the range of other administrative duties re-
  lated to tracking the PRP.
  Specifications:  Also available in set of 6 reports PC  E99/
  MF E99, PB91-130773.  Supersedes PB90-243189. See also
  PB91-130815 and PB91-130831. 104p.
  Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Ohio, Waste
  disposal, Coordinated procurement, Directories, Site Enforce-
  ment Tracking System,  Superfund, Remedial  action, Poten-
  tially responsible parties.

0725   Site Enforcement  Tracking System (SETS): PRP
  Listing by Site for Ohio
  Order Number PB91-170746CDH, price: PC A06/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Waste Programs Enforcement; 5 Apr 91
  When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
  hensive Environmental  Response,  Compensation  and Liabil-
  ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a  search to identify parties
  with  potential financial  responsibility for remediation of un-
  controlled hazardous waste sites.  EPA regional  Superfund
  Waste Management Staff issued a  notice letter to the poten-
  tially  responsible party (PRP).  Data from this  notice letter is
  used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
  This data includes PRP name  and  address, a company con-
  tact  person, the date the notice was issued, and  the related
  CERCLA site name and  identification number.  SETS  was
  created to track PRP identification  at both NPL (National Pri-
  ority  List) and non-NPL sites. SETS does  not address the
  range of other  administrative  duties related to tracking the
  PRP. The site report is  designed to provide PRP  information
  linked by the associated site, which appears according to the
  state where the site is located.
  Specifications: Also available  in set  of 6 reports PC  E99/
  MF E99, PB91-170696. Supersedes PB91-130823. See also
  PB91-170738 and PB91-170753. 115p.
  Subject index  keywords: Hazardous materials,  Waste dis-
  posal, Superfund, Notification  procedures, Directories,  Ohio,
  Site  Enforcement  Tracking System, Potentially  responsible
  parties.
 130

-------
                                                                     PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Enforcement
 0726  Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
   Listing by Site for Oklahoma
   Order Number PB90-243247CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
   Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
   Waste Programs Enforcement; 2 Aug 90
   When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
   hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and  Liabil-
   ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to  identify parties
   with potential  financial responsibility for remediation  of un-
   controlled  hazardous  waste  sites. EPA  regional Superfund
   Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
   tially responsible party (PRP). Data from this  notice letter is
   used to form the Site  Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
   The data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
   tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
   CERCLA site  name  and identification  number.  SETS was
   created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
   ority List) and non-NPL  sites. SETS does  not address the
   range of other administrative  duties related to tracking the
   PRP. These lists (updated quarterly) represent EPA's prelimi-
   nary findings on the identities of potentially responsible par-
   ties. Inclusion on these lists does not constitute a final deter-
   mination concerning the liability of any party for the hazard or
   contamination  at any  CERCLA site. The site report  is de-
   signed to provide PRP information linked by the associated
   site, which appears according to Oklahoma  where the site is
   located.
   Specifications: Also  available in  set of 5 reports PC  E99/
   MF E99, PB90-243205. See  also  PB90-243239 and PB90-
  243254. 69p.

  Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials,  Oklahoma,
  Waste disposal, Coordinated  procurement,  Directories, Site
  Enforcement Tracking  System, Superfund, Remedial action.

0727  Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
  Listing by Site for Oklahoma
  Order Number PB91-130930CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington,  DC. Office of
  Waste Programs Enforcement;  19 Dec 90
  When expending  Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
  hensive  Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
  ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
  with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
  controlled hazardous  waste  sites.  EPA  regional  Superfund
  Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
  tially responsible party (PRP) for the state of  Oklahoma.  Data
  from this notice letter is used to form the Site Enforcement
  Tracking System (SETS).  This data includes PRP name and
  address, a company contact person, the date the notice was
  issued, and  the related CERCLA site name and identification
  number.  SETS  was created to track  PRP  identification at
  both NPL (National Priority List)  and non-NPL sites. SETS
  does not address the range of other administrative duties re-
  lated to tracking the PRP.
  Specifications: Also available  in  set of 5 reports PC  E99/
  MF E99, PB91-130898. Supersedes PB90-243247. See  also
  PB91-130922 and PB91-130948. 68p.
  Subject  index  keywords: Hazardous materials, Oklahoma,
  Waste disposal, Coordinated procurement, Directories,  Site
  Enforcement Tracking  System, Superfund, Remedial action,
  Potentially responsible  parties.
 0728  Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
   Listing by Site for Oklahoma
   Order Number PB91-170803CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
   Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
   Waste Programs Enforcement; 5 Apr 91
  .When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
   hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
   ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search  to identify parties
   with potential  financial  responsibility for remediation  of un-
   controlled hazardous waste  sites. EPA regional Superfund
   Waste Management Staff issued a notice letter to the poten-
   tially responsible party (PRP). Data from this notice letter is
   used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
   This data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
   tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
   CERCLA site  name  and identification number. SETS was
   created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
   ority List)  and non-NPL  sites. SETS does not address the
   range of other administrative duties related to tracking the
   PRP. The site  report is designed to provide PRP information
   linked by the associated, site, which appears according to the
   state where the site is located.
  Specifications: Also  available in set of 5 reports PC E99/
   MF E99.PB91-170761. Supersedes PB91-130930. See also
  PB91-170795 and PB91-170811. 69p.
  Subject index keywords:  Hazardous materials, Waste dis-
  posal, Superfund, Notification procedures, Directories, Okla-
  homa, Site Enforcement Tracking System, Potentially respon-
  sible parties.

0729  Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
  Listing by Site for Oregon
  Order Number PB90-243478CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
 .Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Waste Programs Enforcement; 2 Aug 90
  When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
  hensive  Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
  ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
  with potential  financial responsibility for  remediation of un-
  controlled hazardous  waste sites.  EPA regional Superfund
  Waste Management Staff issue  a notice letter to the poten-
  tially responsible party (PRP). Data from  this notice letter is
  used to form the Site  Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
  The data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
  tact person, the date the  notice was issued, and the related
  CERCLA site  name  and identification number.  SETS was
  created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
  ority List) and  non-NPL  sites. SETS does  not  address the
  range  of other  administrative  duties related to  tracking the
  PRP. These lists (updated quarterly) represent EPA's prelimi-
  nary findings on the identities of potentially responsible par-
 ties. Inclusion on these lists  does not constitute a final deter-
 mination concerning the liability of any party for the hazard or
 contamination at any  CERCLA  site. The site  report is de-
 signed to provide PRP information linked by the associated
 site, which appears according to Oregon where the site is lo-
 cated.
 Specifications: Also  available in set of 3 reports PC E99/
 MF E99, PB90-243452. See also  PB90-243460 and PB90-
 243486. 6p.
 Subject  index  keywords:  Hazardous materials,  Oregon,
 Waste disposal, Coordinated procurement,  Directories, Site
 Enforcement Tracking System, Superfund, Remedial action.
                                                                                                              131

-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Enforcement
0730  Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
  Listing by Site for Oregon
  Order Number PB91-131169CDH, price: PC A01/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Waste Programs Enforcement; 19 Dec 90
  When expending Superfund  monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
  hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
  ity Actf site, EPA must conduct a  search to identify parties
  with potential financial  responsibility for remediation of un-
  controlled hazardous waste sites.  EPA regional Superfund
  Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
  tially responsible party (PRP) for the state of Oregon. Data
  from this notice letter is used to form the Site Enforcement
  Tracking System (SETS). This data includes  PRP name and
  address, a company contact person, the date the notice was
  issued, and the related CERCLA site name and identification
  number.  SETS was created to track PRP  identification at
  both NPL (National  Priority  List) and non-NPL  sites. SETS
  does not address the range  of other administrative duties re-
  lated to tracking the  PRP.
  Specifications: Also available in set of 3 report PC E99/MF
  E99,  PB91-131144.  Supersedes  PB90-243478.  See  also
  PB91-131151 and PB91-131177. 5p.
  Subject  index keywords:  Hazardous materials, Oregon,
  Waste disposal,  Coordinated  procurement, Directories, Site
  Enforcement Tracking System, Superfund, Remedial action,
  Potentially responsible parties.

0731 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
  Listing by Site for Oregon
  Order Number PB91-171033CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Waste Programs Enforcement; 5 Apr 91
  When expending  Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
  hensive  Environmental  Response,  Compensation and Liabil-
  ity Act) site, EPA must  conduct a search to identify parties
  with potential  financial responsibility for remediation of un-
  controlled hazardous waste sites.  EPA regional  Superfund
  Waste Management Staff issued a notice letter to the poten-
  tially  responsible  party (PRP). Data from this notice letter is
  used  to form the  Site Enforcement Tracking  System (SETS).
  This data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
  tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
  CERCLA site name and identification  number. SETS was
  created to track PRP identification  at both NPL (National Pri-
  ority  List) and non-NPL sites. SETS does not address the
  range of other administrative duties related to tracking the
  PRP. The site report is designed to provide  PRP information
  linked by the associated site, which appears  according to the
  state where the site is located.
  Specifications: Also available in set of 3 reports PC  E99/
  MF E99, PB91-171017. Supersedes PB91-131169. See also
  PB91-171025 and PB91-171041. 7p.
  Subject Index keywords:  Hazardous materials, Waste dis-
  posal,   Superfund,   Notification   procedures,   Directories,
  Oregon, Site Enforcement  Tracking System, Potentially re-
  sponsible parties.
0732  Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
  Listing by Site for Pennsylvania
  Order Number PB90-243015CDH, price: PC A07/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Waste Programs Enforcement; 2 Aug 90
  When expending Superfund  monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
  hensive Environmental Response, Compensation  and Liabil-
  ity Act)  site, EPA must  conduct a  search to identify parties
  with  potential financial  responsibility for remediation of un-
  controlled hazardous waste sites.  EPA regional  Superfund
  Waste Management Staff  issue a notice letter to  the poten-
  tially responsible party (PRP). Data from this notice letter is
  used to form the Site Enforcement  Tracking System (SETS).
  The data includes PRP  name and  address,  a company con-
  tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
  CERCLA site name  and  identification number. SETS was
  created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
  ority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS does  not address the
  range of other administrative duties related to tracking the
  PRP. These lists (updated quarterly) represent EPA's prelimi-
  nary findings on  the identities of potentially responsible par-
  ties. Inclusion on these  lists  does not constitute a final deter-
  mination concerning the liability of any  party for the hazard or
  contamination at  any CERCLA site.  The site  report is de-
  signed to provide PRP  information linked by the  associated
  site, which appears according to Pennsylvania where the site
  is located.
  Specifications: Also available in set  of 5  reports PC E99/
  MF E99, PB90-242983. See also  PB90-243007  and PB90-
  243023. 140p.
  Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials,  Pennsylva-
  nia,  Waste disposal, Coordinated  procurement,  Directories,
  Site  Enforcement Tracking  System,  Superfund, Remedial
  action.
 0733  Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
  Listing by Site for Pennsylvania
  Order Number PB91-130666CDH, price: PC A10/MF A02
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Waste Programs Enforcement; 19 Dec 90
  When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
  hensive Environmental  Response,  Compensation and Liabil-
  ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search  to identify parties
  with potential financial  responsibility for remediation of  un-
  controlled  hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
  Waste  Management Staff issue  a  notice letter to the poten-
  tially responsible party  (PRP) for the  state of Pennsylvania.
  Data from this notice letter  is used to form the Site Enforce-
  ment Tracking System (SETS). This data includes PRP name
  and address, a company contact person, the date the notice
  was issued, and the related CERCLA site  name and identifi-
  cation number. SETS was created  to track  PRP identification
  at both NPL (National Priority List) and non-NPL  sites. SETS
  does not address the range of other administrative duties re-
  lated to tracking the PRP.
  Specifications:  Also available in  set of 5 reports  PC E99/
   MF E99, PB91-130633. Supersedes PB90-243015. See also
   PB91-130658 and PB91-130674. 208p.
   Subject index keywords:  Hazardous materials, Pennsylva-
   nia, Waste disposal, Coordinated procurement,  Directories,
   Site  Enforcement  Tracking System,  Superfund,  Remedial
   action, Potentially responsible parties.
 132

-------
                                                                     PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Enforcement
 0734  Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
   Listing by Site for Pennsylvania
   Order Number PB91-170571CDH, price: PC A10/MF A02
   Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
   Waste Programs Enforcement; 5 Apr 91
   When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
   hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
   ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search  to identify parties
   with potential  financial  responsibility for remediation  of un-
   controlled hazardous waste  sites. EPA regional Superfund
   Waste Management Staff issued a notice letter to the poten-
   tially responsible party (PRP). Data from this notice letter is
   used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
   This data includes PRP name and address, a company  con-
   tact person, the date the notice  was issued, and the related
   CERCLA site  name  and identification number. SETS  was
   created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
   ority List)  and non-NPL  sites. SETS does not address the
   range of other administrative  duties related to tracking the
   PRP. The site  report is designed to provide PRP information
   linked by the associated site, which appears according to the
   state where the site is located.
   Specifications: Also  available in set of 5 reports PC E99/
   MF E99, PB91-170548. Supersedes PB91-130666. See  also
  PB91-170658 and PB91-170589.  220p.
  Subject index keywords:  Hazardous materials, Waste  dis-
  posal, Superfund, Notification procedures, Directories,  Penn-
  sylvania, Site  Enforcement Tracking System, Potentially re-
  sponsible parties.

0735  Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
  Listing by Site for Puerto Rico
  Order Number PB90-242975CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Waste Programs Enforcement; 2 Aug 90
  When expending  Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
  hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
  ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
  with potential  financial responsibility for  remediation of  un-
  controlled hazardous  waste sites.  EPA regional Superfund
  Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
  tially responsible party (PRP). Data from  this notice letter is
  used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
  The data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
  tact person, the date the  notice was issued, and the related
  CERCLA site  name  and identification number.  SETS was
  created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National  Pri-
  ority List) and  non-NPL  sites.  SETS does  not  address  the
  range  of other  administrative  duties related to  tracking  the
  PRP. These lists (updated quarterly) represent EPA's prelimi-
  nary findings on the identities of  potentially responsible par-
  ties. Inclusion on these lists does  not constitute a final deter-
  mination concerning the liability of any party for the hazard or
  contamination at  any  CERCLA site. The site report is  de-
  signed to provide PRP information linked by the associated
  site, which appears according  to Puerto Rico where  the site
  is located.
  Specifications: Also  available in  set of 3 reports PC  E99/
  MF E99, PB90-242942. See also PB90-242967. 6p.
  Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Puerto  Rico,
  Coordinated procurement, Directories, Waste disposal, Site
  Enforcement Tracking  System,  Remedial  action, Superfund.
 0736  Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
   Listing by Site for Puerto Rico
   Order Number PB91-130625CDH, price: PC A01/MF A01
   Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
   Waste Programs Enforcement; 20 Dec 90
   When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
   hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
   ity Act)  site, EPA must conduct a search  to identify parties
   with potential  financial  responsibility for remediation  of un-
   controlled hazardous waste  sites. EPA regional Superfund
   Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the  poten-
   tially responsible party (PRP) for Puerto Rico. Data from this
   notice letter is used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking
   System  (SETS). This data includes PRP name and address,
   a company contact person,  the date the notice  was issued,
   and  the  related CERCLA  site  name  and  identification
   number. SETS  was created to  track PRP identification at
   both NPL (National  Priority  List)  and non-NPL  sites.  SETS
   does not address the range of other administrative duties re-
   lated to  tracking the PRP.
  Specifications: Also  available in  set of 3 reports PC E99/
   MF E99, PB91-130591. Supersedes PB90-242975. See also
  PB91-130617. 4p.
  Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste  dis-
  posal, Coordinated procurement,  Directories,  Site Enforce-
  ment Tracking System,  Superfund, Remedial action, Poten-
  tially responsible parties.

0737  Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
  Listing by Site for Puerto Rico
  Order Number PB91-170530CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Waste Programs Enforcement; 5 Apr 91
  When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA  (Compre-
  hensive  Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
  ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
  with potential financial responsibility for  remediation of  un-
  controlled hazardous  waste  sites.  EPA  regional Superfund
  Waste Management Staff issued a notice letter to the poten-
  tially responsible party (PRP). Data from  this notice letter is
  used to form the Site  Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
  This data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
  tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
  CERCLA site name  and identification number.  SETS was
  created to track PRP identification  at both NPL (National Pri-
  ority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS  does  not address the
  range  of other administrative duties related to tracking the
  PRP. The site report is designed to provide PRP  information
  linked by the associated site,  which appears according to the
  state where the site is located.
  Specifications: Also  available in set  of 3 reports PC  E99/
  MF E99, PB91-170506. Supersedes PB91-130625. See also
  PB91-170522. 6p.
  Subject  index keywords: Hazardous materials,  Waste dis-
  posal, Superfund, Notification procedures, Directories, Puerto
  Rico, Site Enforcement Tracking System,  Potentially respon-
  sible parties.
                                                                                                              133

-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Enforcement
0738  Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
  Listing by Site for Region 1
  Order Number PB92-173111CDH, price: Call for price
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington,  DC. Office of
  Waste Programs Enforcement; Apr 92
  When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
  hensive Environmental Response, Compensation  and Liabil-
  ity Act) site, EPA must  conduct a search to identify parties
  with potential financial  responsibility for remediation  of un-
  controlled  hazardous waste sites. EPA regional  Superfund
  Waste Managment Staff issue a notice letter to the potential-
  ly  responsible  party (PRP). Data from the notice letter is
  used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
  The data includes PRP  name and address, a company con-
  tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
  CERCLA site name and  identification number.  SETS was
  created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
  orities List) and non-NPL sites.  SETS  does not address the
  range of other administrative duties related to tracking the
  PRP.  The site report is  designed to provide PRP information
  linked by the associated site, which appears according to the
  state  where the site is located.  Region 1 includes Connecti-
  cut, Massachusetts, Maine, New Hampshire,  Rhode Island
  and Vermont.
  Specifications: Supersedes PB92-139534. 874p.
  Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste  disposal,  Haz-
  ardous  materials,  Directories,  Site  Enforcement Tracking
  System, Potentially responsible parties, EPA region 1.

0739 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
  Listing by Site for Region 1
  Order Number PB92-220029CDH, price: Call for price
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Waste Programs Enforcement; Jul 92
  When expending Superfund monies  at a CERCLA (Compre-
  hensive Environmental  Response, Compensation  and  Liabil-
  ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
  with potential financial  responsibility for remediation of un-
  controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional  Superfund
  Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
  tially  responsible party  (PRP). Data from the  notice letter  is
  used  to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
  The data includes PRP name and address, a  company con-
  tact person, the date the notice was issued, and  the related
  CERCLA site  name and identification number.  SETS  was
  created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
  ority List) and non-NPL  sites.
  Specifications:  Supersedes PB92-173111. 882p.
  Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Financial
  management, Law enforcement, Tracking, Superfund, Reme-
  dial Action.
0740  Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
  Listing by Site for Region 1
  Order Number PB93-177145CDH, price: Call for price
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Waste Programs Enforcement; Apr 93
  When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
  hensive Environmental  Response, Compensation and Liabil-
  ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search  to  identify parties
  with  potential  financial responsibility for remediation  of un-
  controlled  hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
  Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the  poten-
  tially  responsible party (PRP). Data from the  notice letter is
  used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
  The data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
  tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
  CERCLA site name and identification number.
  Specifications: Also available in set of 10 reports PC A99,
  PB93-177137. Supersedes  PB93-134203. See also  PB93-
  177152. 1194p.
  Subject index  keywords:  Law enforcement, Superfund,
  Sites, Waste management, Potential responsible party.

0741  Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):  PRP
  Listing by Site for Region 1, January 22, 1992
  Order Number PB92-139534CDH, price: PC A12
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Waste Programs Enforcement; 22 Jan 92
  When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
  hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
  ity Act)  site, EPA must  conduct a search to  identify parties
  with  potential financial responsibility for remediation  of  un^-
  controlled  hazardous  waste sites.  EPA regional  Superfund
  Waste  Management Staff issue a notice letter to the  poten-
  tially responsible party (PRP).  Data from the notice letter is
  used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
  The data includes PRP  name and address, a company con-
  tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
  CERCLA site name and identification number. SETS  was
  created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National  Pri-
  ority List) and non-NPL sites.
  Specifications: Supersedes PB92-105246. 258p.
  Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste  dis-
  posal, Directories,  Superfund, Potentially responsible parties,
  USEPA region 1.

0742  Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
  Listing by Site for Region 1. Volume 1
  Order Number PB93-134203CDH, price: Call for price
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Waste  Programs Enforcement; 9 Dec 92
  When expending Superfund  monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
  hensive Environmental Response, Compensation  and Liabil-
  ity Act) site, EPA  must conduct a  search to identify  parties
  with potential financial  responsibility for remediation of un-
  controlled hazardous waste  sites.  EPA regional  Superfund
  Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to  the poten-
  tially responsible party (PRP). Data from this notice letter is
  used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
  This data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
  tact person, the date the notice was issued,  and the  related
  CERCLA site  name  and identification number. SETS  was
  created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
  ority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS  does not address the
  range  of other administrative duties related  to tracking the
  PRP.
  Specifications: Also available in set of 10 reports PC A99,
  PB93-134195. Supersedes PB92-220029. See also Volume
  2, PB93-134211. 1188p.
  Subject index  keywords:  Superfund,  Remedial  action,
  Waste  disposal,  Directories, Hazardous materials, Site En-
  forcement Tracking System, Potentially responsible parties.
 134

-------
                                                                     PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Enforcement
 0743  Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)- PRP
   Listing by Site for Region 2
   Order Number PB92-173129CDH, price: PC A24
   Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
   Waste Programs Enforcement; Apr 92
   When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
   hensive  Environmental Response, Compensation and  Liabil-
   ity Act) site, EPA  must conduct a search to identify parties
   with  potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
   controlled  hazardous waste sites.  EPA  regional Superfund
   Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
   tially responsible party (PRP). Data from the notice  letter is
   used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System  (SETS)
   The data includes  PRP name and address, a company con-
   tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
   CERCLA  site name and identification number.  SETS was
   created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
   orities List) and nori-NPL sites. SETS does not address the
   range of other administrative duties related to tracking the
   PRP. The site report is designed to provide PRP information
   linked by the associated site, which appears according to the
   state where  the  site is  located.  Region  2 includes   New
   Jersey, New York, Puerto  Rico, and Virgin Islands.
   Specifications: Supersedes PB92-139542. 572p.
   Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste disposal, Haz-
   ardous materials,  Directories, Site  Enforcement Tracking
   System, Potentially responsible parties, EPA region 2.
 0744  Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
   Listing by Site for Region 2
   Order Number PB92-220037CDH, price: PC A25/MF A06
   Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
   Waste Programs Enforcement; Jul 92
   When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
   hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
   ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search  to identify parties
   with potential  financial  responsibility for remediation of un-
   controlled hazardous waste sites.  EPA  regional Superfund
   Waste Management Staff  issue a notice letter to the poten-
   tially responsible party (PRP).  Data from the notice letter is
   used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)
   The data includes PRP name and address, a company  con-
  tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the  related
   CERCLA  site  name  and  identification  number. SETS  was
  created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
  ority List)  and non-NPL sites.
  Specifications: Supersedes PB92-173129. 577p.
  Subject index keywords:  Hazardous  materials, Financial
  management,  Law enforcement, Tracking,  Superfund,  Reme-
  dial Action.

0745  Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
  Listing by Site for Region 2
  Order Number PB93-177152CDH, price: PC A24
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Waste Programs Enforcement; Apr 93
  When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
  hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
  ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search  to identify parties
  with potential  financial responsibility for remediation  of  un-
  controlled hazardous  waste  sites. EPA regional Superfund
  Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the  poten-
  tially responsible party (PRP). Data from the notice letter is
  used to form the Site  Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
   The data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
   tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
   CERCLA site name and identification number.
   Specifications: Also available in set of 10 reports PC A99,
   PB93-177137. Supersedes  PB93-134211. See also  PB93-
   177145 and PB93-177160. 575p.
   Subject index  keywords:  Law  enforcement,  Superfund,
   Sites, Waste management, Potential responsible party.

 0746  Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
   Listing by Site for Region 2, January 22, 1992
   Order Number PB92-139542CDH, price: PC A17
   Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
   Waste Programs Enforcement; 22 Jan 92
   When expending Superfund  monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
   hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and  Liabil-
   ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search  to identify parties
   with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
   controlled hazardous waste  sites. EPA regional Superfund
   Waste  Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
   tially responsible party (PRP). Data from the notice letter is
   used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
   The data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
   tact person,  the date the notice was issued, and the related
   CERCLA site name and  identification  number. SETS was
   created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
   ority List) and non-NPL sites.  Region 2 includes New Jersey,
   New York, Puerto  Rico,  and Virgin  Islands. There are no
  sites in this state/territory at this time.
  Specifications: Supersedes PB92-105253. 387p.
  Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste dis-
  posal, Directories, Superfund, Potentially responsible parties,
  US EPA region 2.

0747  Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
  Listing by Site for Region 2. Volume 2
  Order Number PB93-134211CDH, price: PC A24
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Waste Programs Enforcement; 9 Dec 92
  When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
  hensive  Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
  ity Act) site,  EPA must conduct a search  to identify parties
  with potential financial  responsibility for remediation of un-
  controlled  hazardous waste  sites. EPA regional Superfund
  Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
  tially responsible party (PRP). Data from this  notice letter is
  used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
  This data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
  tact  person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
  CERCLA  site name  and  identification number. SETS was
  created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
  ority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS does  not address the
  range of other  administrative  duties related to tracking the
  PRP.
  Specifications: Also available in set of 10  reports PC  A99,
  PB93-134195. Supersedes PB92-220037. See also Volume
  1, PB93-134203 and Volume 3, PB93-134229. 574p.
  Subject  index  keywords:  Superfund,  Remedial  action,
  Waste  disposal,  Directories, Hazardous  materials, Site  En-
  forcement Tracking System, Potentially responsible  parties.
                                                                                                             135

-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Enforcement
0748  Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
  Listing by Site for Region 3
  Order Number PB92-173137CDH, price: PC A22
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Waste Programs Enforcement; Apr 92
  When expending  Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
  hensive Environmental Response, Compensation  and Liabil-
  ity Act) site, EPA must  conduct a  search to identify parties
  with potential financial  responsibility for remediation of un-
  controlled  hazardous waste sites.  EPA  regional  Superfund
  Waste Management Staff  issue a notice letter to  the poten-
  tially responsible  party (PRP). Data from the notice letter is
  used to form the  Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
  The data includes PRP  name and address, a company con-
  tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
  CERCLA site name  and  identification number. SETS was
  created to track PRP identification at both NPL  (National Pri-
  orities List) and non-NPL  sites. SETS  does not address the
  range of other administrative duties related  to tracking the
  PRP.  The  site report is  designed to provide PRP information
  linked by the associated site, which appears according to the
  state  where the site is located. Region 3 includes Delaware,
  District  of Columbia, Maryland,  Pennsylvania,  Virginia,  and
  West Virginia.
  Specifications: Supersedes PB92-139559. 525p.
  Subject Index keywords: Superfund, Waste disposal,  Haz-
  ardous  materials,  Directories,  Site Enforcement Tracking
  System, Potentially responsible parties, EPA region 3.

 0749  Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
  Listing by Site for Region 3
  Order Number PB93-177160CDH, price: Call for price
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Waste Programs  Enforcement; Apr 93
  When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
  hensive Environmental  Response,  Compensation  and Liabil-
  ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search  to identify parties
  with potential financial  responsibility for remediation of un-
  controlled hazardous waste sites.  EPA regional  Superfund
  Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter  to the poten-
  tially  responsible party  (PRP). Data from the notice letter is
  used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking  System (SETS).
  The data  includes PRP name and  address, a company con-
  tact person, the  date the  notice was issued, and  the related
  CERCLA site name and identification number.
  Specifications: Also available in set of 10 reports PC A99,
  PB93-177137. Supersedes PB93-134229. See also  PB93-
  177152 and PB93-177178. 616p.
  Subject Index  keywords: Law  enforcement,  Superfund,
  Sites, Waste management, Potential responsible party.

 0750  Site  Enforcement Tracking System  (SETS): PRP
  Listing by Site for Region 3, January 22,1992
  Order Number PB92-139559CDH, price: PC A16
  Environmental Protection  Agency, Washington,  DC. Office of
  Waste Programs Enforcement; 22 Jan 92
  When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
   hensive Environmental  Response, Compensation and Liabil-
   ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
  with  potential financial responsibility  for remediation of un-
   controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
   Waste Management Staff issue a  notice letter to the poten-
   tially responsible party (PRP). Data from the notice letter is
   used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
  The data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
  tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
  CERCLA site name and identification number. SETS was
  created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
  ority List) and non-NPL sites. Region 3 includes Delaware,
  District of  Columbia, Maryland, Pennsylvania, Virginia,  and
  West Virginia. There are no sites in the federal district at this
  time.
  Specifications: Supersedes PB92-105261. 372p.
  Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste dis-
  posal, Directories, Superfund, Potentially responsible parties,
  USEPA region 3.

0751  Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
  Listing by Site for  Region 3. Volume 3
  Order Number PB93-134229CDH, price: PC A25
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Waste Programs Enforcement; 9 Dec 92
  When expending Superfund  monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
  hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
  ity Act)  site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
  with potential financial  responsibility for remediation of  un-
  controlled  hazardous waste sites.  EPA regional Superfund
  Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
  tially responsible party (PRP). Data from this notice letter is
  used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
  This data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
  tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
  CERCLA site name and  identification  number. SETS was
  created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
  ority List)  and non-NPL sites.  SETS does not address  the
  range of other administrative duties related to tracking  the
  PRP.
  Specifications: Also available in set of 10 reports PC A99,
  PB93-134195.  Supersedes PB92-220045. See also Volume
  2, PB93-134211 and Volume 4, PB93-134237. 588p.
  Subject index  keywords: Superfund,  Remedial  action,
  Waste disposal,  Directories, Hazardous materials, Site  En-
  forcement Tracking System,  Potentially responsible parties.

 0752  Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
  Listing by Site for Region 4
  Order Number PB92-173145CDH, price: PC A16
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC.  Office of
  Waste Programs Enforcement; Apr 92
  When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA  (Compre-
  hensive Environmental  Response, Compensation and Liabil-
  ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search  to identify parties
  with potential  financial responsibility for remediation of un-
  controlled  hazardous waste sites. EPA regional  Superfund
  Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
  tially  responsible party  (PRP).  Data from  the  notice letter  is
  used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
  The data  includes  PRP name  and address, a company con-
  tact person, the date the  notice  was issued, and the related
  CERCLA  site  name and identification number. SETS  was
  created to track PRP identification at both  NPL (National Pri-
  orities List) and non-NPL sites. SETS does not address the
  range of  other administrative  duties related to tracking the
  PRP. The site report is designed to provide PRP information
  linked by the associated site, which appears according to the
  state where the site is located.  Region 4 includes Alabama,
 136

-------
                                                                     PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Enforcement
   Florida, Georgia, Kentucky, Mississippi, North Carolina, South
   Carolina, and Tennessee.
   Specifications:  Supersedes PB92-139567. 352p.
   Subject index keywords: Superfund,  Waste disposal, Haz-
   ardous materials,  Directories, Site Enforcement  Tracking
   System, Potentially responsible parties, EPA region 4.

 0753  Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
   Listing by Site for Region 4
   Order Number PB92-220052CDH, price: PC A18/MF A04
   Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
   Waste Programs Enforcement; Jul 92
   When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
   hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
   ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search  to identify  parties
   with potential  financial  responsibility for remediation  of  un-
   controlled hazardous waste  sites. EPA regional Superfund
   Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the  poten-
   tially responsible party (PRP). Data from the notice letter is
   used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
   The data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
   tact person,  the date the notice was issued, and the related
   CERCLA site  name  and identification number. SETS was
   created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
   ority List) and non-NPL sites.
   Specifications: Supersedes PB92-173145. 407p.
   Subject  index keywords:  Hazardous  materials, Financial
   management, Law enforcement, Tracking, Superfund, Reme-
   dial Action.

0754  Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
   Listing by Site for Region 4
   Order Number  PB93-177178CDH, price: Call for price
   Environmental  Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office  of
   Waste Programs Enforcement; Apr 93
   When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
   hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and  Liabil-
   ity Act) site,  EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
  with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
   controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
  Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
  tially responsible  party (PRP). Data from the notice letter is
  used to form the  Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
  The data includes PRP name  and  address,  company contact
  person, the  date the  notice was issued,  and  the related
  CERCLA site name and identification number.
  Specifications: Also available in set of 10 reports PC A99,
  PB93-177137.  Supersedes PB93-134237.  See  also  PB93-
  177160 and PB93-177186. 842p.
  Subject index keywords:  Law  enforcement,  Superfund,
  Sites, Waste  management, Potential responsible party.

0755  Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
  Listing by Site for Region 4, January 22, 1992
  Order  Number PB92-139567CDH, price: PC A12
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Waste Programs Enforcement; 22 Jan 92
  When  expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
  hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and  Liabil-
  ity Act) site,  EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
  with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
  controlled hazardous  waste  sites.  EPA  regional Superfund
  Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
  tially responsible party (PRP). Data from the notice letter is
   used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
   The data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
   tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
   CERCLA site name  and identification number.  SETS was
   created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
   ority List)  and non-NPL sites.  These lists for Region 4 in-
   cludes  Alabama,  Florida,  Georgia, Kentucky,  Mississippi,
   North Carolina, South Carolina, and Tennessee.
   Specifications: Supersedes  PB92-105279. 256p.
   Subject index keywords: Waste disposal, Hazardous mate-
   rials, Directories, Superfund.

0756  Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
   Listing by Site for Region 4. Volume 4
   Order Number PB93-134237CDH, price: Call for price
   Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
   Waste Programs Enforcement; 9 Dec 92
   When expending Superfund monies at  a CERCLA (Compre-
   hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
   ity Act) site, EPA  must conduct a search to identify parties
   with potential financial  responsibility for remediation of un-
   controlled  hazardous waste  sites. EPA regional Superfund
   Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
   tially responsible party (PRP). Data from this notice letter is
   used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
  This data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
  tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
  CERCLA site  name and identification  number. SETS was
  created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
  ority List) and non-NPL  sites. SETS does not address the
  range of other administrative duties  related to tracking the
  PRP.
  Specifications: Also available in  set of 10 reports PC A99,
  PB93-134195.  Supersedes  PB92-220052. See also Volume
  3, PB93-134229 and Volume 5, PB93-134245. 656p.
  Subject index keywords:  Superfund,  Remedial  action,
  Waste  disposal, Directories,  Hazardous materials, Site  En-
  forcement Tracking System, Potentially responsible parties.

0757  Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
  Listing by Site for Region  5
  Order Number PB92-173152CDH, price:  Call for price
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Waste Programs Enforcement; Apr 92
  When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
  hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
  ity  Act) site,  EPA must conduct a search to  identify parties
  with potential financial responsibility  for remediation of  un-
  controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional  Superfund
  Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
  tially responsible party (PRP). Data from the  notice letter is
  used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
  The data includes PRP name  and address, a company con-
  tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
  CERCLA site name  and identification  number. SETS was
  created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
  orities List) and non-NPL sites.  SETS does not address the
  range of other administrative  duties related to tracking the
  PRP. The site report is designed to provide PRP information
  linked by the associated site, which appears according to the
  state where the site is located. Region 5 includes Illinois, In-
  diana, Michigan, Minnesota,  Ohio, and Wisconsin.
  Specifications: Supersedes PB92-139575. 1022p.
                                                                                                              137

-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Enforcement
  Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste disposal,  Haz-
  ardous  materials, Directories,  Site  Enforcement Tracking
  System, Potentially responsible parties, EPA region 5.
0758  Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
  Listing by Site for Region 5
  Order Dumber PB92-220060CDH, price: Call for price
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Waste Programs Enforcement; Jul 92
  When expending Superfund  monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
  hensive Environmental Response, Compensation  and Liabil-
  ity Act)  site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
  with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
  controlled  hazardous waste sites.  EPA regional  Superfund
  Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to  the poten-
  tially responsible party (PRP). Data  from the notice letter is
  used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
  The data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
  tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
  CERCLA site name  and  identification number. SETS was
  created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
  ority List) and non-NPL sites.
  Specifications: Supersedes PB92-173152. 1462p.
  Subject index  keywords:  Hazardous materials, Financial
  management, Law enforcement, Tracking, Superfund, Reme-
  dial Action.
0759  Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
  Listing by Site for Region 5
  Order Number PB93-177186CDH, price: Call for price
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Waste Programs Enforcement; Apr 93
  When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
  hensive Environmental Response, Compensation  and Liabil-
  ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
  with potential financial  responsibility for remediation of un-
  controlled hazardous waste sites.  EPA regional  Superfund
  Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to  the poten-
  tially responsible party (PRP). Data from the notice letter  is
  used to form  the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
  The data includes PRP name and address,  a company con-
  tact person, the date the notice was issued, and  the related
  CERCLA site  name and identification number.
  Specifications: Also available  in set of 10  reports  PC A99,
  PB93-177137. Supersedes  PB93-134245. See also  PB93-
  177178 and PB93-177194. 1590p.
  Subject index  keywords:  Law  enforcement,  Superfund,
  Sites, Waste management, Potential responsible party.
  CERCLA  site name and identification  number.  SETS  was
  created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
  ority List)  and non-NPL sites.
  Specifications:  Supersedes PB92-105287. 720p.
  Subject index keywords: Hazardous  materials, Waste dis-
  posal, Directories, Superfund, Potentially responsible parties,
  US EPA region 5.

0761  Site  Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
  Listing by Site for Region 5. Volume  5
  Order Number PB93-134245CDH, price: Call for price
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Waste Programs Enforcement; 9 Dec 92
  When expending Superfund  monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
  hensive Environmental Response, Compensation  and Liabil-
  ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a  search to  identify parties
  with  potential financial  responsibility for remediation  of un-
  controlled hazardous waste sites.  EPA regional  Superfund
  Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to  the poten-
  tially responsible party (PRP). Data from this notice letter is
  used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
  This  data includes PRP name and  address, a company con-
  tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
  CERCLA  site name and identification number. SETS was
  created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
  ority  List) and non-NPL sites. SETS does not address the
  range of  other  administrative duties related to tracking the
  PRP.
  Specifications: Also available in set of 10 reports PC A99,
  PB93-134195.  Supersedes  PB92-220060. See  also Volume
  4, PB93-134237 and Volume 6, PB93-134252. 1128p.
  Subject  index keywords:  Superfund,  Remedial  action,
  Waste disposal, Directories,  Hazardous materials, Site En-
  forcement Tracking System,  Potentially responsible parties.

0762   Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
  Listing by Site for Region 6
  Order Number PB92-173160CDH, price: PC A17
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Waste Programs Enforcement; Apr 92
  When expending Superfund monies at a  CERCLA (Compre-
  hensive Environmental  Response,  Compensation  and  Liabil-
  ity Act) site, EPA  must conduct a search to identify parties
  with  potential financial responsibility for  remediation of un-
  controlled hazardous waste  sites. EPA regional  Superfund
  Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
  tially responsible party  (PRP). Data from  the notice letter  is
  used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
  The  data includes PRP name and  address, a company con-
  tact  person, the date the notice was issued, and  the related
  CERCLA site  name and  identification number.  SETS was
  created to track PRP identification  at both NPL (National Pri-
  orities List) and non-NPL sites. SETS  does not address the
  range of other administrative duties related  to tracking the
  PRP. The site report is designed to provide PRP  information
  linked by the associated site, which appears according to the
  state where the site is  located. Region 6 includes Arkansas,
  Louisiana, New Mexico, Oklahoma, and Texas.
  Specifications: Supersedes PB92-139583. 394p.
  Subject  index  keywords:  Superfund, Waste disposal, Haz-
  ardous  materials,  Directories, Site  Enforcement Tracking
  System,  Potentially responsible parties, EPA region 6.

-------
                                                                     PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Enforcement
 0763  Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
   Listing by Site for Region 6
   Order Number PB92-220078CDH, price: PC A17/MF A04
   Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
   Waste Programs Enforcement; Jul 92
   When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
   hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
   ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search  to identify parties
   with potential  financial  responsibility for remediation of  un-
   controlled  hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
   Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
   tially responsible party (PRP).  Data from the notice letter is
   used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
   The data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
   tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
   CERCLA site  name  and  identification number. SETS  was
   created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
   ority List) and non-NPL sites.
   Specifications: Supersedes PB92-173160. 398p.
   Subject  index keywords: Hazardous  materials, Financial
   management, Law enforcement, Tracking, Superfund, Reme-
   dial Action.

0764 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
   Listing by Site for Region 6
   Order Number  PB93-177194CDH, price: PC A17
   Environmental  Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
   Waste Programs Enforcement; Apr 93
   When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
   hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
   ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a  search to identify parties
   with potential financial responsibility  for remediation of un-
   controlled hazardous waste sites.  EPA  regional Superfund
  Waste Management  Staff issue a notice  letter to the poten-
  tially responsible party (PRP). Data from the notice letter is
   used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
  The data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
  tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
  CERCLA site name and identification number.
  Specifications: Also available  in set of 10 reports PC A99,
  PB93-177137.  Supersedes  PB93-134252.  See  also PB93-
   177186 and PB93-177202. 398p.
  Subject index keywords: Law  enforcement,  Superfund,
  Sites, Waste management, Potential responsible party.
0765  Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
  Listing by Site for Region  6, January 22, 1992
  Order  Number PB92-139583CDH, price: PC A12
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Waste Programs Enforcement; 22 Jan 92
  When  expending Superfund monies at a  CERCLA (Compre-
  hensive Environmental Response,  Compensation and Liabil-
  ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
  with potential financial responsibility for  remediation  of  un-
  controlled hazardous  waste sites.  EPA regional Superfund
  Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
  tially responsible party (PRP). Data from  the notice letter is
  used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
  The data includes PRP name and  address,  a company con-
  tact person, the date the notice was issued, and  the related
  CERCLA  site name  and identification number.  SETS  was
  created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
  ority List) and non-NPL sites.
   Specifications: Supersedes PB92-105295. 269p.
   Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste dis-
   posal,  Directories, Superfund, Potentially responsible parties,
   US EPA region 6.

0766  Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
   Listing by Site for Region 6. Volume 6
   Order Number PB93-134252CDH, price: PC A17
   Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
   Waste  Programs Enforcement; 9 Dec 92
   When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
   hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
   ity Act) site, EPA  must conduct a search to identify parties
   with potential financial  responsibility for remediation of un-
   controlled  hazardous waste sites.  EPA regional  Superfund
   Waste  Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
   tially responsible party (PRP). Data from this notice letter is
   used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
   This data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
   tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
   CERCLA site name  and  identification  number.  SETS was
   created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
   ority List)  and non-NPL sites.  SETS does not address the
   range of other administrative duties related to tracking the
   PRP.
  Specifications: Also  available  in set of 10 reports PC A99,
   PB93-134195. Supersedes PB92-220078. See also  Volume
  5, PB93-134245 and Volume 7, PB93-134260. 396p.
  Subject index  keywords: Superfund,  Remedial   action,
  Waste  disposal, Directories, Hazardous  materials, Site  En-
  forcement Tracking System, Potentially responsible parties.

0767  Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
  Listing by Site for Region 7
  Order Number PB92-173178CDH, price: PC A17
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Waste Programs Enforcement; Apr 92
  When expending Superfund monies at  a CERCLA (Compre-
  hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
  ity  Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify  parties
  with potential  financial responsibility for  remediation  of  un-
  controlled  hazardous  waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
  Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
  tially responsible party (PRP). Data  from the notice letter is
  used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
  The data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
  tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
  CERCLA site  name  and identification  number. SETS  was
  created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
  orities List) and non-NPL sites. SETS does not address the
  range of other administrative duties related  to tracking the
  PRP. The site  report is designed to provide PRP information
  linked by the associated site, which appears according to the
  state where the site is located. Region  7 includes Iowa,
  Kansas, Missouri, and Nebraska.
  Specifications: Supersedes PB92-139591. 398p.
  Subject index keywords: Superfund,  Waste disposal, Haz-
  ardous  materials,  Directories,  Site Enforcement Tracking
  System, Potentially  responsible parties, EPA region 7.
                                                                                                             139

-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Enforcement
0768  Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
  Listing by Site for Region 7
  Order Number PB92-220086CDH, price: PC A18/MF A04
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Waste Programs Enforcement; Jul 92
  When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
  hensive Environmental Response, Compensation  and Liabil-
  ity Act) site, EPA must  conduct a search to identify parties
  with potential financial responsibility for remediation  of un-
  controlled  hazardous waste sites. EPA  regional  Superfund
  Waste Management  Staff issue a notice letter to  the poten-
  tially responsible party (PRP). Data from the notice letter is
  used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking  System (SETS).
  The data includes PRP  name and address, a company con-
  tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
  CERCLA site name  and  identification  number. SETS was
  created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
  ority List) and non-NPL sites.
  Specifications: Supersedes PB92-173178. 404p.
  Subject index  keywords: Hazardous materials, Financial
  management, Law enforcement, Tracking, Superfund,  Reme-
  dial Action.
0769  Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
  Listing by Site for Region 7
  Order Number PB93-177202CDH, price: PC A18
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Waste Programs Enforcement; Apr 93
  When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
  hensive Environmental Response, Compensation  and  Liabil-
  ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify  parties
  with  potential financial  responsibility for remediation of un-
  controlled  hazardous waste sites. EPA  regional  Superfund
  Waste Management Staff  issue a notice letter to  the poten-
  tially responsible party (PRP). Data from the notice letter is
  used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
  The data includes PRP  name and address, a company con-
  tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
  CERCLA site name and identification number.
  Specifications: Also available in set of  10 reports PC A99,
  PB93-177137.  Supersedes PB93-134260.  See also PB93-
  177194 and PB93-177210. 41 Op.
  Subject Index  keywords: Law enforcement,  Superfund,
  Sites, Waste management, Potential responsible party.

0770  Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
  Listing by Site for Region 7, January 22, 1992
  Order Number PB92-139591CDH, price: PC A12
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Waste Programs Enforcement; 22 Jan 92
  When expending Superfund monies  at a CERCLA (Compre-
  hensive Environmental Response, Compensation  and  Liabil-
  ity Act) site, EPA must conduct  a search to identify parties
  with potential financial  responsibility for remediation of un-
  controlled  hazardous waste sites.  EPA regional  Superfund
  Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
  tially responsible party (PRP). Data from the notice letter  is
  used  to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
  The data includes PRP name and address,  a company con-
  tact person, the date the notice was issued, and  the related
  CERCLA site name and  identification number.  SETS was
  created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
  ority List) and non-NPL sites.
  Specifications:  Supersedes PB92-105303. 270p.
  Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste dis-
  posal, Directories, Superfund, Potentially responsible parties,
  USEPA region 7.

0771  Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
  Listing by Site for Region 7. Volume 7
  Order Number PB93-134260CDH, price: PC A17
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Waste Programs Enforcement; 9 Dec 92
  When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
  hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
  ity Act) site, EPA must  conduct a search  to identify parties
  with potential financial responsibility for remediation of  un-
  controlled  hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
  Waste Management  Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
  tially responsible party (PRP). Data from this notice letter is
  used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
  This data includes PRP  name and address, a company con-
  tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
  CERCLA site name and  identification number. SETS was
  created to track PRP identification at both  NPL (National  Pri-
  ority  List)  and  non-NPL sites. SETS  does not address  the
  range of other administrative duties related to tracking  the
  PRP.
  Specifications: Also available in set of 10 reports PC A99,
  PB93-134195. Supersedes PB92-220086.  See  also Volume
  6, PB93-134252 and Volume 8, PB93-134278. 400p.
  Subject  index keywords:  Superfund,  Remedial action,
  Waste disposal, Directories,  Hazardous materials, Site  En-
  forcement Tracking System, Potentially responsible parties.

0772  Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
  Listing by Site for Region 8
  Order Number PB92-173186CDH, price: PC A12
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington,  DC. Office of
  Waste Programs Enforcement; Apr 92
  When expending Superfund  monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
  hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and  Liabil-
  ity Act)  site, EPA must conduct  a search to  identify parties
  with  potential financial  responsibility for remediation of  un-
  controlled hazardous waste sites.  EPA regional  Superfund
  Waste Management Staff  issue a notice letter to the poten-
  tially responsible party (PRP). Data from the  notice letter is
  used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
  The data includes PRP  name and address, a company con-
  tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
  CERCLA  site name and  identification  number. SETS was
  created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
  orities List) and non-NPL sites. SETS does not address the
  range of other  administrative duties related to tracking  the
  PRP.  The site report is  designed to provide PRP information
  linked by the associated site, which appears according  to the
  state  where the site is located. Region 8 includes Colorado,
  Montana,  North Dakota, South Dakota,  Utah, and Wyoming.
  Specifications: Supersedes PB92-139609. 265p.
  Subject index keywords: Superfund, Hazardous materials,
  Waste  disposal,  Directories, Site  Enforcement  Tracking
  System, Potentially responsible parties, EPA region 8.
 140

-------
                                                                     PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Enforcement
 0773  Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
   Listing by Site for Region 8
   Order Number PB92-220094CDH, price: PC A14/MF A03
   Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
   Waste Programs Enforcement; Jul 92
   When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
   hensive Environmental  Response, Compensation and Liabil-
   ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search  to identify parties
   with potential  financial  responsibility for remediation  of un-
   controlled  hazardous waste  sites. EPA regional Superfund
   Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the  poten-
   tially responsible party  (PRP). Data from the notice letter is
   used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
   The data includes PRP name and address, a company  con-
   tact person, the date the notice was issued,  and the related
   CERCLA site  name  and identification number.  SETS  was
   created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
   ority List) and non-NPL sites.
   Specifications: Supersedes PB92-173186. 302p.
   Subject  index keywords: Hazardous materials, Financial
   management, Law enforcement, Tracking, Superfund, Reme-
   dial Action.

0774 Site Enforcement  Tracking System (SETS): PRP
   Listing by Site for Region 8
   Order Number  PB93-177210CDH, price: PC A16
   Environmental  Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
   Waste Programs Enforcement; Apr 93
   When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
   hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and  Liabil-
   ity Act) site, EPA must  conduct a search to  identify parties
   with potential financial  responsibility  for remediation of un-
   controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
   Waste Management  Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
   tially responsible party (PRP). Data from the  notice letter is
   used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
  The data includes PRP  name and address, a company con-
  tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
  CERCLA site name and  identification number.
  Specifications: Also available in set of 10 reports PC A99,
  PB93-177137.  Supersedes  PB93-134278.  See  also PB93-
   177202 and PB93-177228. 359p.
  Subject  index keywords: Law  enforcement,  Superfund,
  Sites, Waste management, Potential responsible party.

0775  Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
  Listing by Site for Region  8, January 22, 1992
  Order Number PB92-139609CDH, price: PC A06
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Waste Programs Enforcement; 22 Jan 92
  When  expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
  hensive Environmental Response,  Compensation and Liabil-
  ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to  identify parties
  with potential financial responsibility for remediation of  un-
  controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional  Superfund
  Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
  tially responsible party (PRP). Data from the  notice letter is
  used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
  The data  includes PRP name and  address,  a  company con-
  tact person, the date the notice was issued, and  the related
  CERCLA  site name  and identification number.  SETS  was
  created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National  Pri-
  ority List) and non-NPL sites.
   Specifications: Supersedes PB92-105311. 117p.
   Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste dis-
   posal,  Directories, Superfund, Potentially responsible parties,
   USEPA region 8.

 0776  Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
   Listing by Site for Region 8. Volume 8
   Order Number PB93-134278CDH, price: PC A15
   Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
   Waste  Programs Enforcement; 9 Dec 92
   When expending Superfund monies at a CERGLA (Compre-
   hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
   ity Act) site, EPA  must conduct a search to identify parties
   with potential financial  responsibility for remediation of un-
   controlled  hazardous waste sites.  EPA  regional  Superfund
   Waste  Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
   tially responsible party (PRP). Data from this notice letter is
   used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
  This data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
  tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
  CERCLA site name  and  identification  number.  SETS was
  created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
  ority List)  and non-NPL sites.  SETS  does not address the
  range of other administrative duties related to tracking the
  PRP.
  Specifications: Also  available  in set of 10 reports PC A99,
  PB93-134195. Supersedes PB92-220094. See also  Volume
  7, PB93-134260 and Volume 9, PB93-134286. 346p.
  Subject index  keywords: Superfund,  Remedial   action,
  Waste  disposal, Directories, Hazardous  materials, Site  En-
  forcement Tracking System, Potentially responsible parties.

0777  Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
  Listing by Site for Region 9
  Order Number PB92-173194CDH, price: PC A17
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Waste Programs Enforcement; Apr 92
  When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
  hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
  ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
  with potential  financial responsibility for  remediation of un-
  controlled  hazardous  waste  sites. EPA regional Superfund
  Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
  tially responsible party (PRP). Data  from  the notice  letter is
  used to form the Site  Enforcement Tracking System  (SETS).
  The data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
  tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
  CERCLA site  name  and identification number. SETS  was
  created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
  orities List) and non-NPL sites. SETS  does not address the
  range of other administrative duties related  to tracking the
  PRP. The site  report is designed to provide PRP information
  linked by the associated site, which appears according to the
  state where the site is located. Region 9 includes American
  Samoa, Arizona, California, Guam, Hawaii, Midway, Nevada,
  Northern Marianas, Pacific  Islands,  Trust Territories,  and
  Wake Island.
  Specifications: Supersedes PB92-139617. 382p.
  Subject index keywords: Superfund,  Waste disposal, Haz-
  ardous  materials,  Directories,  Site Enforcement Tracking
  System, Potentially  responsible parties, EPA region 9.
                                                                                                             141

-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Enforcement
0778  Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
  Listing by Site for Region 9
  Order Number PB92-220102CDH, price: PC A18/MF A04
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Waste Programs Enforcement; Jul 92
  When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
  hensive Environmental Response, Compensation  and Liabil-
  ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a  search to identify parties
  with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
  controlled hazardous waste sites.  EPA regional  Superfund
  Waste Management Staff  issue a notice letter to  the poten-
  tially responsible party (PRP). Data from the notice letter is
  used to form the Site Enforcement  Tracking System (SETS).
  This data includes PRP name and  address, a company con-
  tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
  CERCLA site name  and  identification number. SETS was
  created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
  orities List) and non-NPL sites. SETS does not address the
  range of other administrative duties related to tracking the
  PRP.  Region 9  includes American  Samoa, Arizona, Califor-
  nia, Guam, Hawaii, Midway, Nevada, Northern Marianas, Pa-
  cific Islands, Trust Territories, and Wake Island.
  Specifications: Supersedes PB92-173194. 402p.
  Subject  Index keywords: Superfund, Hazardous materials,
  Waste disposal,  Remedial action,  Directories, Site  Enforce-
  ment  Tracking System, Potentially responsible parties.

0779 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
  Listing by Site for Region 9
  Order Number PB93-177228CDH, price: PC A20
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Waste Programs Enforcement; Apr  93
  When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
  hensive Environmental Response,  Compensation  and Liabil-
  ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a  search to identify parties
  with potential financial responsibility for remediation  of un-
  controlled hazardous waste sites.   EPA regional  Superfund
  Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
  tially  responsible party (PRP). Data from  the notice letter is
  used  to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
  The data includes PRP name and  address, a company con-
  tact person, the date the  notice was issued, and  the related
  CERCLA site name and identification number.
  Specifications: Also available in set of 10 reports  PC A99,
  PB93-177137.  Supersedes PB93-134286.  See also  PB93-
  177210 and PB93-177236. 471 p.
  Subject  Index  keywords:  Law  enforcement,  Superfund,
  Sites, Waste management, Potential responsible party.
0780  Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
  Listing by Site for Region 9, January 22, 1992
  Order Number PB92-139617CDH, price: PC A12
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Waste Programs Enforcement; 22 Jan 92
  When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
  hensive  Environmental Response,  Compensation and Liabil-
  ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify  parties
  with  potential financial responsibility for  remediation of un-
  controlled  hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
  Waste Management  Staff issue a  notice  letter to the poten-
  tially  responsible party (PRP). Data from the notice letter is
  used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
  The data includes PRP name and  address, a company con-
  tact person, the date the  notice was issued, and the  related
  CERCLA  site name and identification  number.  SETS was
  created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
  ority List)  and non-NPL sites. There are no sites in this state/
  territory at this time.
  Specifications: Supersedes PB92-105329. 261 p.
  Subject index keyword:;:  Hazardous materials, Waste  dis-
  posal, Directories, Superfund, Potentially responsible parties,
  US EPA region 9.

0781  Site  Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
  Listing by Site for Region  9. Volume 9
  Order Number PB93-134286CDH, price: PC A18
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Waste Programs Enforcement; 9 Dec 92
  When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
  hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and  Liabil-
  ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
  with  potential financial responsibility  for remediation of un-
  controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional  Superfund
  Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
  tially responsible party (PRP). Data from this notice letter is
  used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
  This  data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
  tact person, the date the notice was  issued, and the related
  CERCLA  site  name  and identification  number. SETS was
  created to track PRP identification at  both NPL (National Pri-
  ority  List) and non-NPL sites. SETS does  not address the
  range of  other administrative duties  related to tracking the
  PRP.
  Specifications: Also available in set of 10 reports PC A99,
  PB93-134195.  Supersedes  PB92-220102. See  also Volume
  8, PB93-134278 and Volume 10, PB93-134294. 415p.
  Subject  index keywords:  Superfund, Remedial  action,
  Waste disposal, Directories,  Hazardous materials, Site En-
  forcement Tracking System, Potentially responsible parties.

0782   Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
  Listing by Site for Region 10
  Order Number PB92-173202CDH, price: PC A12
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Waste Programs Enforcement; Apr 92
  When expending Superfund monies at  a CERCLA (Compre-
  hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
  ity Act) site, EPA  must conduct a search to identify parties
  with  potential  financial responsibility for remediation  of un-
  controlled hazardous waste  sites. EPA regional Superfund
  Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the  poten-
  tially  responsible party (PRP). Data from the notice letter  is
  used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
  The  data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
  tact  person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
  CERCLA site  name and  identification  number. SETS  was
  created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
  orities List) and non-NPL sites. SETS does not address the
  range of other administrative duties related to tracking the
  PRP. The site report is designed to  provide PRP information
  linked by the associated site, which appears according to the
  state where the site is located.  Region 10 includes Alaska,
  Idaho, Oregon, and Washington.
  Specifications: Supersedes PB92-139625. 271 p.
  Subject  index keywords:  Superfund, Waste disposal, Haz-
  ardous  materials,  Directories,  Site  Enforcement  Tracking
  System,  Potentially responsible parties, EPA region 10.
 142

-------
                                                                     PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Enforcement
 0783  Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
   Listing by Site for Region 10
   Order Number PB92-220110CDH, price: PC A12/MF A03
   Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
   Waste Programs Enforcement; Jul 92
   When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
   hensive  Environmental Response, Compensation and  Liabil-
   ity Act) site,  EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
   with potential financial responsibility for  remediation  of un-
   controlled  hazardous  waste sites. EPA  regional Superfund
   Waste Management Staff issue a notice  letter to the  poten-
   tially responsible party (PRP). Data from the notice letter is
   used to form the Site  Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
   The data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
   tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
   CERCLA  site name  and identification number. SETS was
   created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
   ority List) and non-NPL sites.
   Specifications: Supersedes PB92-173202.  274p.
   Subject  index keywords: Hazardous  materials,  Financial
   management, Law enforcement, Tracking, Superfund, Reme-
   dial Action.

0784 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
   Listing by Site for Region 10
   Order Number PB93-177236CDH, price: PC A14
   Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC.  Office of
   Waste Programs Enforcement; Apr 93
   When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA  (Compre-
   hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and  Liabil-
   ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a  search to identify parties
   with potential financial responsibility  for remediation of un-
   controlled hazardous waste sites.  EPA regional Superfund
  Waste  Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
  tially responsible party (PRP).  Data from the notice letter is
  used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
  The data includes PRP name and address,  a company con-
  tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
  CERCLA site name and identification number.
  Specifications: Also available in set of 10  reports PC A99
  PB93-177137.  Supersedes  PB93-134294.  See also PB93-
  177228. 312p.
  Subject  index keywords: Law  enforcement,  Superfund,
  Sites, Waste management, Potential responsible party.
0785  Site Enforcement Tracking System  (SETS): PRP
  Listing by Site for Region  10, January 22,  1992
  Order Number PB92-139625CDH, price: PC A13
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Waste Programs Enforcement; 22 Jan 92
  When  expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
  hensive Environmental  Response,  Compensation and Liabil-
  ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
  with potential  financial responsibility for remediation of un-
  controlled  hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
  Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
  tially responsible party  (PRP). Data from the notice letter is
  used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking  System (SETS).
  The data  includes PRP name and  address, a company  con-
  tact person, the date the  notice was issued, and  the related
  CERCLA  site  name  and  identification number.  SETS  was
  created to track PRP identification at both  NPL (National Pri-
  ority List) and non-NPL sites. Region 10 includes Alaska,
   Idaho, Oregon, and Washington. There are no sites in this
   state/territory at this time.
   Specifications: Supersedes PB92-105337. 282p.
   Subject  index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste dis-
   posal, Directories, Superfund, Potentially responsible parties,
   US EPA region 10.

 0786  Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
   Listing by Site for Region 10. Volume 10
   Order Number PB93-134294CDH, price: PC A12
   Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
   Waste Programs Enforcement; 9 Dec 92
   When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
   hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
   ity Act) site, EPA  must conduct a search  to identify parties
   with potential  financial  responsibility for remediation of un-
   controlled hazardous waste  sites. EPA regional Superfund
   Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
   tially responsible party (PRP). Data from this notice letter is
   used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
   This data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
   tact person, the date the notice was  issued, and the related
   CERCLA  site  name and  identification  number. SETS was
   created to track PRP identification at  both NPL  (National Pri-
   ority List)  and non-NPL sites. SETS does not address the
   range of  other administrative duties  related  to tracking the
   PRP.
  Specifications: Also available in set of 10 reports PC A99,
  PB93-134195.  Supersedes PB92-220110. See  also Volume
  9, PB93-134286. 274p.
  Subject  index keywords:  Superfund,  Remedial  action,
  Waste disposal, Directories,  Hazardous  materials, Site  En-
  forcement Tracking System, Potentially responsible parties.

0787  Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
  Listing by Site for Rhode Island
  Order Number PB90-242926CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Waste Programs Enforcement; 2 Aug 90
  When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
  hensive Environmental  Response, Compensation and Liabil-
  ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
  with potential  financial responsibility for  remediation  of  un-
  controlled  hazardous waste sites. EPA regional  Superfund
  Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the  poten-
  tially responsible party (PRP). Data from this notice letter is
  used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
  The data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
  tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
  CERCLA site  name  and identification number.  SETS  was
  created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
  ority List)  and non-NPL sites. SETS  does  not  address the
  range  of other administrative  duties  related to  tracking the
  PRP. These lists (updated quarterly) represent EPA's prelimi-
  nary findings on the identities of potentially responsible par-
  ties. Inclusion on these lists does  not constitute a final deter-
  mination concerning the liability of any party for the hazard or
  contamination  at any CERCLA site.  The site report  is de-
  signed to provide PRP  information linked by the associated
  site, which appears according to Rhode Island where the site
  is located.
                                                                                                              143

-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Enforcement
  Specifications: Also available in set of 6 reports PC E99/
  MF E99, PB90-242876. See  also PB90-242918 and PB90-
  242934. 32p.
  Subject  index  keywords:  Hazardous  materials,  Rhode
  Island, Waste  disposal, Coordinated procurement, Directo-
  ries, Site Enforcement Tracking System, Superfund, Remedi-
  al action.

0788  Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
  Listing by Site for Rhode Island
  Order Number  PB91-130575CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
  Environmental  Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Waste Programs Enforcement; 19 Dec 90
  When expending Superfund monies at  a CERCLA (Compre-
  hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
  ity Act)  site, EPA must  conduct a search to identify parties
  with potential  financial  responsibility for remediation of un-
  controlled hazardous waste  sites.  EPA regional Superfund
  Waste Management Staff  issue a notice letter to the poten-
  tially responsible party (PRP) for the state of Rhode Island.
  Data from this  notice letter is used to form the Site Enforce-
  ment Tracking  System (SETS). This data includes PRP name
  and address, a company contact person, the date the notice
  was issued, and the related CERCLA site name and identifi-
  cation number. SETS was created to track PRP identification
  at both  NPL (National Priority List) and  non-NPL sites. SETS
  does not address the range of other administrative duties re-
  lated to tracking the PRP.
  Specifications: Also available  in set of 6 reports PC E99/
  MF E99, PB91-130526. Supersedes PB90-242926. See also
  PB91-130567 and PB91-130583. 38p.
  Subject index  keywords:  Hazardous materials,  Rhode
  Island,  Waste  disposal, Coordinated procurement, Directo-
  ries, Site Enforcement Tracking System, Superfund, Remedi-
  al action, Potentially responsible parties.

0789 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
  Listing by Site for Rhode Island
  Order Number PB91-170480CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
  Environmental  Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Waste Programs Enforcement; 5 Apr 91
  When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
  hensive Environmental  Response, Compensation and Liabil-
  ity  Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
  with potential  financial  responsibility for remediation of un-
  controlled  hazardous waste  sites. EPA regional  Superfund
  Waste Management Staff issued a notice letter to the poten-
  tially responsible party  (PRP). Data from this notice letter is
  used  to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
  This data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
  tact person, the date the  notice was issued, and the related
  CERCLA  site  name and identification number. SETS was
  created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
  ority List) and non-NPL sites.  SETS does not address the
  range of other administrative duties related to tracking the
  PRP. The site report is designed to provide  PRP information
  linked by the associated site, which appears according to the
  state where the site is located.
  Specifications:  Also available in set of 6 reports PC  E99/
  MF E99, PB91-170431. Supersedes PB91-130575. See also
  PB91-170472  and PB91-170498. 40p.
  Subject index keywords: Hazardous  materials, Waste dis-
  posal, Superfund, Notification procedures, Directories, Rhode
  Island,  Site  Enforcement Tracking  System,  Potentially re-
  sponsible parties.

0790  Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
  Listing by Site for South Carolina
  Order Number PB90-243114CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Waste Programs Enforcement; 2 Aug 90
  When expending Superfund monies  at a CERCLA (Compre-
  hensive Environmental Response, Compensation  and Liabil-
  ity Act) site, EPA must  conduct a search to  identify parties
  with  potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
  controlled hazardous waste sites.  EPA  regional  Superfund
  Waste  Management Staff issue a notice letter to  the poten-
  tially responsible party (PRP). Data from this notice letter is
  used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
  The data includes PRP  name and address, a company con-
  tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
  CERCLA site name  and identification number. SETS was
  created to track PRP identification at both NPL  (National Pri-
  ority List) and  non-NPL  sites. SETS does not address the
  range of other administrative duties related to tracking the
  PRP. These lists (updated quarterly) represent EPA's prelimi-
  nary findings on  the identities of potentially responsible par-
  ties. Inclusion on these lists does not constitute a  final deter-
  mination  concerning the liability of any  party for the hazard or
  contamination at  any CERCLA site. The  site  report is de-
  signed to provide PRP  information linked by the  associated
  site, which appears according to South Carolina  where the
  site is located.
  Specifications: Also available in set  of 8 reports PC  E99/
  MF E99, PB90-243049.  See also PB90-243106  and PB90-
  243122. 24p.
  Subject index keywords: Hazardous  materials, South Caro-
  lina, Waste disposal, Coordinated  procurement, Directories,
  Site Enforcement Tracking System,  Superfund,  Remedial
  action.
 0791  Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
  Listing by Site for South Carolina
  Order Number PB91-130757CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Waste Programs Enforcement; 19 Dec 90
  When  expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
  hensive Environmental  Response, Compensation and Liabil-
  ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search  to identify parties
  with potential financial  responsibility for remediation of un-
  controlled  hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
  Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter  to the poten-
  tially responsible party (PRP) for the state  of South Carolina.
  Data from this notice letter is used to  form the Site Enforce-
  ment Tracking System (SETS). This data includes PRP  name
  and address, a company contact person, the date the notice
  was issued, and the related CERCLA  site  name and identifi-
  cation number. SETS was created to track PRP identification
  at both NPL (National Priority List) and non-NPL sites.  SETS
  does not address the range of other administrative duties re-
  lated to tracking the PRP.
  Specifications:  Also available in set  of 8 reports PC E99/
  MF E99, PB91-130690. Supersedes PB90-243114. See also
  PB91-130740 and PB91-130765. 23p.
  Subject index keywords: Hazardous  materials, South  Caro-
  lina, Waste disposal, Coordinated procurement,  Directories,
 144

-------
                                                                      PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Enforcement
   Site Enforcement  Tracking  System, Superfund, Remedial
   action, Potentially responsible parties.

 °7.9.2  Sitf Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
   Listing by Site for South Carolina
   Order Number PB91-170670CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
   Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
   Waste Programs Enforcement; 5 Apr 91
   When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
   hens.ve  Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-

   2th  nLo?' i ,  ™S>  C0nduct a  search to identify Parties
   with  potential financial responsibility  for remediation of un-
   controlled  hazardous waste sites.  EPA  regional Superfund
   Waste Management Staff issued a notice letter to the poten-
   lally responsible party (PRP). Data from this notice letter is
   used to form the Site Enforcement  Tracking System (SETS)
   This data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
   ^lo£?rA °n' the date the notice was issued, and the related
   UERCLA site name and identification number.  SETS was
   created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
   ority  List) and  non-NPL sites.  SETS  does not address the
   DDDSTU    •    administrative duties related to tracking the
   L^HK  ^'t6 rep°? is desi9ned to provide PRP  information
   linked by the associated site, which appears according to the
   state where the site  is located.
               s: Also available in set of 8 reports PC E99/
  PRQ-I i™«R;1~1?S?«; SuPersedes PB91-130757. See also
  PB91-170654 and PB91 -170688. 26p.
  Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials,  Waste dis-
  posal, Superfund, Notification procedures, Directories South
  Carolina, Site Enforcement Tracking System, Potentially re-
  sponsible parties.

0793   Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
  Listing by Site for South Dakota
  Order Number PB90-243353CDH, price: PC A01/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Waste Programs Enforcement; 2 Aug 90
  When expending  Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
  hensive Environmental Response, Compensation  and Liabil-
  »ri»,  nV11?' ,EP-A must cond"ct a search to  identify parties
  with  Potential  financial responsibility for remediation of un-
  controlled hazardous  waste  sites.  EPA  regional  Superfund
  Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to  the poten-
  lally  responsible party (PRP). Data from this  notice  letter is
  used  to form the Site  Enforcement Tracking System  (SETS)
  The data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
  ocn^f/f°n- the date the notice was issued, and the  related
  otHOLA site  name  and identification number. SETS was
  created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
  ority List)  and non-NPL sites. SETS does  not address the
  nanDe-rK  °th,er administrative duties related to tracking the
  PRP These lists (updated quarterly) represent EPA's prelimi-
  nary findings on the identities of potentially responsible par-
 ties. Inclusion on these lists does not constitute a final deter-
 mination concerning the liability of any party for the hazard or
 contamination  at any  CERCLA site. The site report  is de-
 signed to provide  PRP information linked by the associated
 site, which appears according to South  Dakota where the
 site is  located.
             s: Also avai|able in set of 6 reports PC E99/
      ,9'  PB9°-243312- See  also PB90-243346 and PB90-
 243361. 4p.
    Subject  index  keywords:  Hazardous  materials,  South
    Dakota, Waste disposal, Coordinated procurement, Directo-
    ries, Site Enforcement Tracking System, Superfund, Remedi-
    al action.

  0794   Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
    Listing by Site for South Dakota
    Order Number PB91-131045CDH, price: PC A01/MF A01
    Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
    Waste Programs Enforcement; 19 Dec 90
    When expending  Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
    hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and  Liabil-
    ity Act) site, EPA must conduct  a search to identify parties
    with  potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
    controlled hazardous waste sites.  EPA  regional Superfund
    Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
    tially responsible party (PRP) for  the state of South Dakota.
    Data from this notice letter  is used to form the Site Enforce-
    ment Tracking System (SETS).  This data includes PRP name
    and  address, a company contact  person, the date the notice
    was  issued,  and the related CERCLA site name and identifi-
    cation number. SETS was created to track PRP identification
    at both NPL (National Priority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS
    does not address the range of other administrative duties re-
    lated to tracking the PRP.
    Specifications: Also available  in  set of 6 reports PC  E99/
    MF E99, PB91-131003. Supersedes PB90-243353. See also
    PB91-131037 and  PB91-131052. 4p.
   Subject  index  keywords: Hazardous materials,  South
   Dakota, Waste disposal, Coordinated procurement, Directo-
   ries,  Site Enforcement Tracking System, Superfund, Remedi-
   al action, Potentially  responsible parties.

 0795  Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
   Listing by Site for South  Dakota
   Order Number PB91-170910CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
   Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
   Waste Programs Enforcement; 5 Apr 91
   When expending Superfund  monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
   hensive Environmental Response,  Compensation  and Liabil-
   ity Act) site,  EPA must conduct a search to  identify parties
   with potential financial responsibility  for remediation of un-
   controlled hazardous waste  sites. EPA regional  Superfund
   Waste Management Staff issued a notice letter to  the poten-
   tially responsible party (PRP). Data from this  notice letter is
   used to form  the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)
  This data includes PRP name and  address, a company con-
  tact person, the date the notice  was  issued, and the related
  CERCLA site  name  and identification number. SETS  was
  created to track PRP identification  at  both NPL (National Pri-
  ority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS  does not address the
  range of other  administrative duties  related to tracking the
  PRP. The site report is designed to provide PRP information
  linked by the associated site,  which appears according to the
  state where the site is located.
  Specifications: Also  available in set  of 6 reports PC E99/
  MF  E99, PB91-170878. Supersedes PB91-131045. See also
  PB91-170902 and PB91-170928. 6p.
  Subject index keywords:  Hazardous materials, Waste  dis-
  posal,  Superfund, Notification procedures, Directories, South
.  Dakota, Site Enforcement  Tracking System, Potentially re-
  sponsible parties.
                                                                                                              145

-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Enforcement
0796  Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
  Listing by Site for Tennessee
  Order Number PB90-243122CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Waste Programs Enforcement; 2 Aug 90
  When expending Superfund monies at  a CERCLA (Compre-
  hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
  ity Act)  site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
  with potential financial responsibility for remediation  of un-
  controlled hazardous waste  sites. EPA regional Superfund
  Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the  poten-
  tially responsible party (PRP). Data from this  notice letter is
  used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
  The data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
  tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
  CERCLA site name and identification number. SETS was
  created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
  ority List) and  non-NPL sites. SETS does not  address the
  range of other administrative duties related to  tracking the
  PRP. These lists (updated quarterly) represent EPA's prelimi-
  nary findings on the identities of  potentially responsible par-
  ties. Inclusion on these lists does not constitute  a final deter-
  mination concerning the liability of any party for the hazard or
  contamination at any CERCLA site. The site report  is de-
  signed  to provide PRP information linked by the associated
  site, which appears according to Tennessee where the site is
  located.
   Specifications: Also  available in set of 8 reports PC E99/
   MF E99, PB90-243049. See also  PB90-243114.  9p.
   Subject index keywords: Hazardous  materials, Tennessee,
   Waste disposal, Coordinated procurement,  Directories, Site
   Enforcement Tracking System, Superfund, Remedial  action.

 0797  Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
   Listing by Site for Tennessee
   Order Number PB91-130765CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
   Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
   Waste Programs Enforcement; 19 Dec 90
   When  expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
   hensive Environmental  Response, Compensation and Liabil-
   ity Act) site. EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
   with potential  financial responsibility for remediation of  un-
   controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional  Superfund
   Waste Management Staff issue  a notice letter to the poten-
   tially  responsible party  (PRP) for the state of Tennessee.
   Data from this notice letter is used to form the Site Enforce-
   ment Tracking System (SETS). This data includes PRP name
   and address, a company contact person, the date the notice
   was issued, and the  related  CERCLA site name and identifi-
   cation number. SETS was created to track PRP identification
   at both NPL (National Priority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS
   does not address the range of other administrative duties re-
    lated to tracking the PRP.
    Specifications:  Also available in set of 8 reports PC E99/
    MF E99, PB91-130690. Supersedes PB90-243122. See also
    PB91-130757. 9p.
    Subject index keywords:  Hazardous materials, Tennessee,
    Waste disposal, Coordinated procurement,  Directories,  Site
    Enforcement Tracking System,  Superfund,  Remedial action,
    Potentially responsible parties.
0798  Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
  Listing by Site for Tennessee
  Order Number PB91-170688CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Waste Programs Enforcement; 5 Apr 91
  When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
  hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
  ity Act)  site, EPA must conduct a  search to identify parties
  with potential financial  responsibility for remediation  of un-
  controlled  hazardous waste  sites.  EPA regional Superfund
  Waste Management Staff issued a  notice letter to the poten-
  tially responsible party (PRP). Data from this notice letter is
  used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
  This data  includes PRP name and  address, a company con-
  tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
  CERCLA  site  name and identification number.  SETS was
  created to track PRP identification  at both NPL (National Pri-
  ority List)  and non-NPL sites. SETS does not  address the
  ranqe of  other administrative duties related to  tracking the
  PRp  The site report is designed to provide PRP information
  linked by the associated site, which appears according to the
  state where the site is located.
  Specifications: Also available in set of 8  reports  PC E99/
  MF E99,  PB91-170605. Supersedes PB91-130765. See also
  PB91-170670. 11 p.
  Subject index keywords:  Hazardous materials, Waste dis-
   posal Superfund, Notification procedures,  Directories, Ten-
   nessee, Site Enforcement  Tracking System, Potentially re-
   sponsible parties.
 0799  Site  Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
   Listing by Site for Texas
   Order Number PB90-243254CDH,  price: PC A05/MF A01
   Environmental Protection Agency,  Washington, DC. Office of
   Waste Programs Enforcement; 2 Aug 90
   When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
   hensive Environmental  Response, Compensation and Liabil-
   ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search  to identify parties
   with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
   controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
   Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter  to the poten-
   tially responsible party  (PRP). Data from this notice letter is
   used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
   The data includes  PRP name and address, a company con-
   tact person, the date the  notice was issued, and the related
   CERCLA site  name and  identification number. SETS  was
   created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
   ority  List) and non-NPL sites. SETS  does not address  the
   range of other administrative  duties related to tracking  the
   PRP These lists (updated quarterly) represent EPA's prelimi-
   nary findings on the identities of  potentially responsible par-
   ties Inclusion on these lists does not constitute a final deter-
    mination concerning the liability of any party for the hazard or
    contamination at any  CERCLA site.  The site report is de-
    signed to provide  PRP information linked by the  associated
    site, which appears according to  Texas where the site is lo-
    cated.
    Specifications: Also  available in set of 5 reports PC E99/
    MF E99, PB90-243205. See also  PB90-243247. 89p.
    Subject  index  keywords:  Hazardous  materials,  Texas,
    Waste disposal, Coordinated procurement, Directories,  Site
    Enforcement Tracking System, Superfund, Remedial action.
   146

-------
                                                                     PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Enforcement
   Order Number PB91-130948CDH, price: PC A05/MF A01

   wSnSmPr?TUOn Agen°y' Washin9ton- DC. Office of
   waste Programs Enforcement; 19 Dec 90
   When expending  Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-

   fe TSS |™r°"menta' ReSp°nse' ^^Pensation and UaW-
   ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to  identify
                                     °r rem        on-
             hazardous  waste sites.  EPA regional Superfund
   Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten
   tally responsible  party (PRP) for the state  of Texas Date
   from this notice letter is used to form the Site Enforcement
   Tracking System (SETS). This data includes  PRP name and
   address, a  company contact person, the date the notice was
   numSr'sETS w^ ^ ^ ""» -d ^enEaS
   both  NPI  ™ ,-   f rfeated *°  track PRP  identification at
   both  NPL (National Priority List) and  non-NPL sites  SETS

                            °f °ther
               : Also  available in set of 5 reports PC E99/

               slT98' SUPerSSdeS PB90-243254' ^ a'S°
  Subject  index keywords:  Hazardous  materials,  Texas
          SP t8?'' C°ordinated Procurement, Directories, stte
                              superfund> Remediai
                                       (SETS): PRP
      ~»* — *  •—-..» • vi i «^yv«o
  Order Number PB91-170811CDH, price- PC A05/MF A01
  WaS"SJ' Pr°tefction A9ency, Washington, DC. Office of
  waste Programs Enforcement; 5 Apr 91

  ^sL^ESn9 ^fn "d m°nieS at a CERCLA Compre-
  hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
             =PA  must conduct a search to identify parties
              financial responsibility  for remediation of un-
 Wai""»T  nazardous waste sites. EPA  regional Superfund
 Waste Management Staff issued a notice letter to the poten
 used oTrm'th6 Party - Data from this notice  letteMs
 used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking  System  (SETS)
 This data includes PRP name and address a company con-
 rpRr?T°V   date the notice was issued.  and the related
 Xt   A t S*   ,name and identification number.  SETS was

 offty U^Sc\non^PLnSeT°SEfsb^ ^ (Nati°nal P^
 ^^°^^^^'^^tedto fraSg ISe
 PRP. The site report is designed to provide PRP  information
                   ,toH 0i*Q  ...N;^ appears ,       ....
E99/
 a,so
             89p
                                 t °f 5
                                 PB91-130948'
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste dis-
posal Superfund Notification procedures, Directories, Texas,
parties             aCkin9  SyStem'  P°tentially  responsible
  0802  Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)- PRP
    Listing by Site for Trust Territories
    Order Number PB90-243445CDH, price: PC A01/MF A01
    Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
    Waste Programs Enforcement; 2 Aug 90
    When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
    hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
    ity Act)  site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
    with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
    u?" tr° »d hazardous waste sites. EPA  regional Superfund
    Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
    tially responsible party (PRP). Data from this notice letter is
    used to  form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)
   The data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
   ^oR??0"' the date the notice was issued, and the related
   OhRCLA site name and  identification number.  SETS was
   created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
   ority  List) and non-NPL sites. SETS  does  not address the
   Lpie-r£    ,er administrative duties related to tracking the
   PRP. These lists (updated quarterly) represent EPA's prelimi-
   nary findings on the identities of potentially responsible par-
   ties. Inclusion on these lists does not constitute a final deter-
   mination concerning the liability of any party for the hazard or
   contamination  at  any CERCLA  site.  The site report  is de-
   signed to provide PRP information linked by the  associated
   site, which appears according to Trust Territories where the
   site is located.

   f£e^f'Cations: Also  available in set of 6 reports PC E99/
   MF E99, PB90-243387. See also  PB90-243437. 5p.
   Subject index keywords:  Hazardous  materials, Trust Terri-
  tory of the Pacific Islands, Waste disposal, Coordinated pro-
  curement  Directories, Site  Enforcement  Tracking  System
  Superfund, Remedial action.

0803  Site  Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
  Listing by Site for Trust Territories
  Order Number PB91-131136CDH, price: PC A01/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Waste Programs Enforcement; 19 Dec 90
  When expending Superfund monies at  a CERCLA (Compre-
  hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
  ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
  with potential financial  responsibility for remediation of un-
  w  1° f,  hazardous waste  sites. EPA regional  Superfund
  Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
  tially responsible party (PRP) for  the Trust Territories  Data
  from this notice letter is used to form  the Site Enforcement
  Tracking System (SETS). This data includes PRP name and
  address, a company contact person, the date  the notice was
 issued, and the related CERCLA site name  and identification
 hn£ MO!  iTS,- Waf ^reated  to track  PRP identification at
 both NPL  (National Priority List) and non-NPL sites SETS
 does not address the range of other administrative duties re-
 lated to tracking the PRP.
                       Also ava'lable in set of 6 reports PC E99/
                      13107a SuPersedes PB90-243445. See also
                    . 4p.
        Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Trust Terri-
        tories Waste disposal, Coordinated procurement, Directories
        Site Enforcement  Tracking System,  Superfund,  Remediai
        action, Potentially responsible parties, Trust Territory  of the
        Pacific Islands.
                                                                                                            147

-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Enforcement
0804  Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
  Listing by Site for trust Territories          ,.„-.„,
  Order Number PB91-171009CDH, price: PC A01/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Waste Programs Enforcement; 5 Apr 91
  When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
  hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
  ity Act)  site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
  with potential  financial responsibility for remediation  of  un-
  controlled hazardous waste sites.  EPA  regional Superfund
  Waste Management Staff issued a notice letter to the poten-
  tially responsible party (PRP). Data from this notice letter is
  used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
  This data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
  tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
  CERCLA site name and  identification  number. SETS was
  created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
  ority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS  does not address the
  range of other administrative duties related to tracking the
   PRP. The site report is designed to provide PRP information
   linked by the associated site, which appears according to the
   state where the site is located.
   Specifications: Also available in set of 6  reports PC E99/
   MF E99, PB91 -170944. Supersedes PB91-131136. See also
   PB91-170993. 5p.
   Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste dis-
   posal, Superfund, Notification procedures,  Directories, Trust
   territory of the Pacific Islands,  Site Enforcement Tracking
   System, Potentially responsible parties.
 0805  Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
   Listing by Site for Utah
   Order Number PB90-243361CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
   Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
   Waste Programs Enforcement; 2 Aug 90
   When  expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
   hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
   ity Act) site,  EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
   with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
   controlled  hazardous waste sites. EPA regional  Superfund
   Waste Management Staff issue  a notice letter to the poten-
   tially responsible party (PRP). Data from this notice letter is
   used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
   The data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
   tact person,  the date the notice was issued, and the related
    CERCLA site name and identification number. SETS was
    created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
    ority List)  and non-NPL  sites. SETS does not address the
    range of other administrative duties related to tracking the
    PFIP, These lists (updated quarterly) represent EPA's prelimi-
    nary findings on the identities of potentially responsible par-
    ties. Inclusion on these lists does  not constitute a final deter-
    mination concerning the liability of any party for the hazard or
    contamination at  any CERCLA site. The site report is de-
    signed to provide PRP information linked  by the associated
    site, which appears according to Utah  where the site is locat-
    ed.
     Specifications: Also available in set of 6  reports PC E99/
     MF E99,  PB90-243312. See  also PB90-243353 and PB90-
     243379.14p.
     Subject index keywords:  Hazardous materials, Waste  dis-
     posal, Utah, Coordinated procurement, Directories, Site  En-
     forcement Tracking System, Superfund, Remedial action.
0806  Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
  Listing by Site for Utah
  Order Number PB91-131052CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Waste Programs Enforcement; 19 Dec 90
  When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
  hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
  ity Act)  site, EPA must conduct a  search to identify parties
  with potential financial  responsibility for remediation  of un-
  controlled hazardous waste  sites.  EPA regional Superfund
  Waste Management Staff issue a notice letterto the poten-
  tially responsible party (PRP) for the state of Utah. Data from
  this notice letter is used to form the Site Enforcement Track-
  ing System  (SETS). This data includes PRP  name and ad-
  dress, a company contact person, the  date the notice was
  issued,  and  the related CERCLA site name and identification
  number. SETS was  created  to track PRP  identification  at
  both  NPL (National Priority  List)  and non-NPL sites  SETb
  does not address the range of other administrative duties re-
  lated to tracking the PRP.
  Specifications: Also available in set of 6 reports  PC E99/
   MF E99, PB91-131003. Supersedes PB90-243361. See also
   PB91-131045 and PB91-131060. 14p.
   Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Utah, Waste
   disposal, Coordinated procurement, Directories, Site Enforce-
   ment Tracking System, Superfund, Remedial  action, Poten-
   tially responsible parties.
 0807  Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
   Listing by Site for Utah
   Order Number PB91-170928CDH,  price: PC A03/MF A01
   Environmental Protection Agency,  Washington, DC. Office of
   Waste Programs Enforcement; 5 Apr 91
   When  expending Superfund monies at a  CERCLA (Compre-
   hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
   ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to  identify parties
   with potential  financial responsibility for  remediation of  un-
   controlled  hazardous  waste sites.  EPA  regional  Superfund
   Waste Management Staff issued a notice letter to the poten-
   tially responsible party (PRP). Data from this notice etter is
   used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
   This data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
   tact person, the date  the notice was issued, and the related
    CERCLA site name  and  identification number. SETS was
    created to track PRP  identification at both NPL (National Pri-
    ority List)  and non-NPL sites. SETS does not address the
    range  of other  administrative duties related  to tracking the
    PRP The  site report  is designed to provide PRP information
    linked by the associated site, which appears according to the
    state where the site is located.
    Specifications: Also available in set  of 6 reports PC  E99/
    MF E99, PB91-170878. Supersedes PB91-131052. See  also
    PB91-170910 and PB91-170936. 16p.
    Subject index  keywords: Hazardous materials,  Waste dis-
    posal  Superfund, Notification procedures, Directories,  Utah,
    Site Enforcement Tracking System,  Potentially responsible
    parties.
   148

-------
                                                                      PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Enforcement
  0808  Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)- PRP
    Listing by Site for Vermont
    Order Number PB90-242934CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
    \A/naVc!t0Tental Protection Aaency, Washington, DC. Office of
    Waste Programs Enforcement; 2 Aug 90
    When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
    itTAct? SrFpTental ResP°nse' Compensation and Liabil-
    Jy Act)  site EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
    SSrSTJ? fTCial resP°nsibility *>r remediation of un
    controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA  regional Superfund
    Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten
    any  esDons,ble party (PRP). Data from this notice letter is
   used to  form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS?
   The data mcludes PRP name and address a company con-
    aC°"'tthe ^ the n°tice was issued> anSTe related
          t     ?a£? and  iderrtifica«on number.  SETS was
          ?  H   PRM identification at both NPL (National P?
          ? ?£  nTNPL SitSS- SETS  does not address the
   PRP  Thl   ,ertadm!?iStrative duties related to ^king the
   PRP. These lists (updated quarterly) represent EPA's orelimi
   nary findings on the identities of poten'afy Iponsib'e S-"
   ^Inclusion on these lists does not constitute a final deter-
   rnmat,on concernmg the liability of any party for the hazard or
   contam.nat.on  at  any CERCLA  site.  The site report  is de-
   11  1  hPr°Vlde PRP information linked by the  associated
   Seated   aPPearS accordin9 to Vermont where the site  is
          oS: Also availab'e in set of 6 reports PC E99/
        9, PB90-242876. See also PB90-242926 Up

               , **yw°rds:  Hazardous materials,  Vermont,
  Enfo        T ' Coordinated Procurement, Directories, Site
  Enforcement Tracking System, Superfund, Remedial action.

0809  Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
  Listing by Site for Vermont                IOM-KK
  Order Number PB91-130583CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
  Wa^nnS' Pr°t€fion A9ency- Washington, DC. Office of
  waste Programs Enforcement; 19 Dec 90
  When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
  £AC? lrrFPAenta' ResP°nse' Compensation and Liabil-
  2th nn^nr , *   "^ C°nduct a search to iden«fy Parties
  ^ntrnM  H  h   'T^' resPonsibility for remediation of un-
  controlled  hazardous waste sites.  EPA regional Superfund
  Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten
  mm  hcP°nf 'e,Party (PRP)  for the state of Vermont Data
 Si  %n0tT 'etter JS US6d to form the Site Enforcement
 Tracking System (SETS). This data includes PRP name and
 Sn  H ' 3H ct°mpany contact Person,  the date the notice was
                   ed °ERCLA Site name and identification
      NPI ™ *•     nreated to track  PRP identification  at
        t  (Nat,onal Pnority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS

      to°
 PB9
              : Also avai|able  in set of 6 reports PC E99/
                                              See alo
              , keywords:  Hazardous materials, Vermont
              '  C,Oordinated Procurement,  Directories, S"te
               °^9 SyStem>  SuPerfund- Remedial action,
          responsible parties.
  0810  Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)- PRP
    Listing by Site for Vermont
    Order Number PB91-170498CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
    Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC Office of
    Waste Programs Enforcement; 5 Apr 91
    When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
    hensive Environmental Response, Compensation  and Liabil-
    ity Act)  site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
   with  potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
   controlled  hazardous waste sites.  EPA  regional  Superfund
   Waste Management Staff issued a notice letter to  the poten-
   tially responsible party (PRP). Data from this notice  letter is
   used to  form the Site Enforcement Tracking  System  (SETS)
   This data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
   ^L£??°n' the date tne notice was issued-  and the related
   OhRCLA site name  and identification number. SETS was
   created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
   ority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS does not address the
   range of other administrative duties related  to tracking the
   PRP  The site report is designed to  provide PRP information
   linked by the associated site, which appears according to the
   state where the site is located.
   Specifications: Also  available in set of 6 reports  PC  E99/
   MF E99, PB91-170431. Supersedes PB91-130583.  See also
   PB91-170480. 11 p.
   Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste dis-
   posal, Superfund, Notification procedures, Directories  Ver-
   mont, Site Enforcement Tracking System, Potentially respon-
  sible parties.

0811  Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)- PRP
  Listing by Site for Virginia
  Order Number PB91-130674CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Waste Programs Enforcement; 19 Dec 90
  When expending  Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
  hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and  Liabil-
  ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
  with potential financial  responsibility  for remediation of un-
  controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA  regional Superfund
  Waste  Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
  tially responsible party (PRP) for  the state of  Virginia.  Data
  from this notice letter is  used  to form the Site Enforcement
 Tracking System (SETS). This data includes PRP name and
 address, a company contact person, the date the notice was
 issued, and the related CERCLA site name and identification
 JUUU MO,  ^!~S W3S °reated to track  PRP identification at
 both NPL  (National Priority List) and non-NPL sites SETS
 does not address the range of other administrative duties re-
 lated to tracking the PRP.
 Specifications: Also available  in set of 5 reports PC  E99/
 MF E99, PB91-130633. Supersedes PB90-243023. See also
 PB91 -130666 and PB91 -130682. 25p.
 Subject  index  keywords: Hazardous materials,  Virginia
 Waste disposal,  Coordinated procurement,  Directories  Site
 Enforcement Tracking System,  Superfund, Remedial  action,
 Potentially responsible parties.
                                                                                                            149

-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Enforcement
0812  Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
  Listing by Site for Virginia                  ,..,-*„,
  Order Number PB91-170589CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Waste Programs Enforcement; 5 Apr 91
  When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
  hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
  ity Act)  site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
  with potential  financial responsibility for remediation  of  un-
  controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA  regional Superfund
  Waste Management Staff issued a notice letter to the poten-
  tially responsible party (PRP). Data from this notice letter is
  used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
  This data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
  tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
  CERCLA site name and  identification  number. SETS was
  created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
  ority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS does not address the
  range of other administrative duties related to tracking the
   PRP. The site report is designed to provide PRP information
   linked by the associated site, which appears according to the
   state where the site is located.
   Specifications: Also available in set of 5  reports PC E99/
   MF E99, PB91-170548. Supersedes PB91-130674. See also
   PB91-170571 and PB91-170597. 32p.
   Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste dis-
   posal, Superfund,  Notification procedures, Directories, Virgin-
   ia, Site Enforcement Tracking System, Potentially responsible
   parties.
 0813  Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
   Listing by Site for Washington
   Order Number PB90-243486CDH, price: PC A06/MF A01
   Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
   Waste Programs Enforcement; 2 Aug 90
   When  expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
   hensive Environmental Response, Compensation  and Liabil-
   ity Act) site,  EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
   with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
   controlled hazardous waste sites.  EPA  regional  Superfund
   Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to  the poten-
   tially responsible party (PRP). Data from this notice letter  is
   used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
   The data includes PRP name and address,  a company con-
   tact person, the date the notice was issued, and  the related
    CERCLA site  name  and  identification number.  SETS was
    created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
    ority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS does  not address the
    range of other administrative duties related to tracking the
    PRp. These  lists (updated quarterly) represent EPA's prelimi-
    nary findings on the identities of potentially responsible par-
    ties. Inclusion on these lists does not constitute a final deter-
    mination concerning the liability of any party for the hazard  or
    contamination at  any CERCLA site. The site report  is de-
    signed to provide PRP information linked by the associated
    site, which appears according to Washington  where the site
    is located.
    Specifications: Also available  in set of 3  reports PC E99/
    MF E99, PB90-243452. See also PB90-243478. 119p.
    Subject   index    keywords:    Hazardous   materials,
    Washington(State),  Waste  disposal,  Coordinated procure-
    ment, Directories, Site Enforcement Tracking System, Super-
    fund, Remedial action.
0814  Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
  Listing by Site for Washington
  Order Number PB91-131177CDH, price: PC A06/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Waste Programs Enforcement; 19 Dec 90
  When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
  hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
  ity Act)  site, EPA must conduct a  search to identify parties
  with potential financial  responsibility for remediation  of un-
  controlled hazardous waste  sites.  EPA regional Superfund
  Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
  tially  responsible  party (PRP) for the state  of Washington.
  Data  from this notice letter is used to form the Site Enforce-
  ment Tracking System (SETS). This data includes PRP name
  and address, a company contact person, the date the notice
  was issued, and the related CERCLA site name and .dentifi-
  cation number. SETS was created to track PRP identification
  at both NPL (National Priority List)  and non-NPL sites. SETS
  does not address the range of other administrative duties re-
  lated to tracking the PRP.
  Specifications: Also available in set of 3 reports  PC E99/
   MF E99, PB91-131144. Supersedes PB91-243486. See also
   PB91-131169. 120p.
   Subject    index   keywords:     Hazardous    materials,
   Washington(State),  Waste  disposal, Coordinated  procure-
   ment Directories, Site  Enforcement Tracking System, Super-
   fund, Remedial action,  Potentially responsible parties.

 0815  Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
   Listing by Site for Washington
   Order Number PB91-171041CDH,  price: PC A07/MF A01
   Environmental Protection Agency,  Washington, DC. Office of
   Waste Programs Enforcement; 5 Apr 91
   When  expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
   hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
   ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
   with potential financial responsibility for  remediation of  un-
   controlled  hazardous  waste sites.  EPA regional Superfund
   Waste Management Staff issued a notice letter to the poten-
   tially responsible party (PRP). Data from  this notice etter is
   used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
   This data includes PRP name and address,  a company con-
   tact person, the date  the notice was issued, and the related
    CERCLA site name  and  identification number. SETS was
    created to track PRP  identification at both NPL (National Pri-
    ority List)  and non-NPL sites. SETS does  not address the
    range of other administrative duties related to tracking the
    PRP The  site report is designed to provide PRP information
    linked by the associated site, which appears according to the
    state where the site is located.
    Specifications: Also available in set  of 3 reports PC  E99/
    MF E99, PB91-171017. Supersedes PB91-131177. See also
    PB91-171033. 147p.
    Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials,  Waste dis-
    posal   Superfund,   Notification   procedures,  Directories,
    Washington(State), Site  Enforcement Tracking System, Po-
    tentially responsible parties.
   150

-------
                                                                      PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION:
  0816  Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)- PRP
    Listing by Site for West Virginia
    Order Number PB90-243031CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01

    WaV^n^n«LPrrtefCti°n Agency' Washington, DC. Office of
    waste Programs Enforcement; 2 Aug 90
    When expending Superfund monies at a  CERCLA (Comore
    nensive Environmental Response, Compensation
    Il?±±' ,EPA ™st conduct a_ search to ic
                       waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
               -  ,     Staff issue a notice letter to the poten
         esfonsib'e Party (PRP). Data from this notice letter is
        to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System SETS?
   The data includes PRP name and address a company con

               he ^ thS n°tiCe WaS iSSUed' aSTe related
          t     ,nanme and  identification  number.  SETS was
          to track PRP identification at both NPL (National^
   onty  List) and  non-NPL sites. SETS  does not address the
                                           °
        TheSe,t                                       e
       . These lists (updated quarterly) represent EPA's orelimi
   nary findings on the identities of potentially responsible S-"
   tes. Inclusion on these lists does not constitute a final dete -
   rn.nat.on concerning the liability of any party for the hazard or
   contamination  at any  CERCLA site. Ths ?£ report ?s £

        hchParnnde PRP in?rmati°n linked *V ^ associated
      eated       S according to West Vir9jnia where the site
          r      Also available in set of 5 reports PC E99/
        9, PB90-242983. See also PB90-243023 14p
  Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, West Virgin-
  Site  EnL^fv Co°rdinated Procurement  Directories,
  action                 m9  SyStem' SuPerfund,  Remedial

0817  Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
  Listing by Site for West Virginia
  Order Number PB91-130682CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01

  Srp^o™^0" A9enCy' Washington, DC. Office of
  waste Programs Enforcement; 19 Dec 90
  When expending Superfund monies at a  CERCLA fComore
            'ppr^1 ReSp°nSe' C°mpensatSn and TS-"
              ,A mUSt C°nduct a search to identify parties
           h  f"^anCial resP0nsib»ity for  remediation of un-
       M  hazardous waste sites. EPA  regional Superfund
 Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten

 Da a fZTf S tPartV (PRP) f°r tne State of West vESSta.
 Data from  this notice letter  is used to form the Site  Enforce-

 Tnd Jdf  9 SyStem (SETS)- This data i^ludes PRP name
 was fssued flnHC?hmPa7 COntaCt person' the date ^ notice
 was issued and the related CERCLA site name and identifi-

 at boVSpLTNaStETS.WpaS CrSated t0 traCk PRP identiSon
        NpL Nl Priority List) and non-NPL sites SETS
               Also avai|able  in set of 5 reports PC E99/
                      Supersedes PB90-243P031 See also
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, West Virgin-
Site En Ll'mPOStalV C°ordinated Procurement,  Directories,
                ^
  0818  Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
    Listing by Site for West Virginia
    Order Number PB91-170597CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
    Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
    Waste Programs Enforcement; 5 Apr 91
    When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
    hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
    ity Act)  site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
   w.th  potential financial responsibility  for remediation of un-
   S?T »  hazardous waste sites. EPA  regional Superfund
   Waste Management Staff issued a notice letter to the poten-
   tially responsible party (PRP). Data from this notice letter is
   used to  form the Site Enforcement Tracking  System (SETS)
   This data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
   r^??0"' the date the notice was issued>  and the related
   CERCLA site name  and identification number.  SETS was
   created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
   ority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS  does not address the
   Daoie-ru °ther administrative duties related  to tracking the
   i-T'^I  tu'te report is des'gned to provide PRP  information
   linked by the associated site, which appears according to the
   state where the site is located.

   ?£e|!?Cations: Also ava'lable in set of 5 reports PC  E99/
   PRa^Tn^o1:170548- SuPersedes PB91-130682. See also
   rnkn-1 /Uoo9. 15p.

   Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste dis-
   posal, Superfund, Notification procedures, Directories  West
  Virginia  Site  Enforcement Tracking System,  Potentially re-
  sponsible parties.

0819  Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
  Listing by Site for Wisconsin
  Order Number PB90-243197CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Waste Programs Enforcement; 2 Aug 90
  When expending  Superfund monies at  a CERCLA (Compre-
  hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
  1L ^t3  !•' ,EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
  with potential financial  responsibility for remediation of un-
  wllt  M  hazardous waste  sites. EPA regional Superfund
  Waste  Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
  lally responsible party (PRP). Data from this notice letter is
  used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)
 The data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
 ^!L£??°n> the date the notice was issued- and the related
 CERCLA  site name and  identification  number. SETS  was
 created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
 ority  List)  and  non-NPL sites. SETS does not address  the
 DaDDe-ru °th,er administrative  duties related to tracking  the
 PRP. These lists (updated quarterly) represent EPA's prelimi-
 nary findings on the identities of potentially responsible par-
 ties. Inclusion on these lists does not constitute a final deter-
 mination concerning the liability of any party for  the hazard or
 contamination  at any CERCLA  site. The site  report is de-
 signed to  provide PRP information linked by the associated
 site, which  appears according  to Wisconsin where the site is
 located.
..v ,_ 	s: Also available in set of 6 reports PC  E99/
MF E99, PB90-243130. See also PB90-243189 44p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Wisconsin
Waste  disposal, Coordinated procurement,  Directories  Site
Enforcement Tracking System, Superfund, Remedial action
                                                                                                            151

-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Enforcement
0820  Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
  Listing by Site for Wisconsin
  Order Number PB91-130831CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Waste Programs Enforcement; 19 Dec 90
  When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
  hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
  ity Act)  site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
  with potential financial responsibility for remediation  of un-
  controlled hazardous waste  sites. EPA regional Superfund
  Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
  tially responsible party (PRP) for the state of Wisconsin. Data
  from this notice letter is used to form the Site Enforcement
  Tracking System (SETS). This data includes PRP name and
  address, a company contact person, the date the notice was
  issued,  and the related CERCLA site name and  identification
   number. SETS was  created to track PRP  identification  at
   both  NPL  (National Priority  List) and non-NPL sites. SETS
   does not address the range of other administrative duties re-
   lated to tracking the PRP.
   Specifications: Also  available in set of 6 reports PC E99/
   MF E99, PB91-130773. Supersedes PB90-243205. See also
   PB91-130823. 54p.
   Subject Index keywords: Hazardous  materials, Wisconsin,
   Waste  disposal,  Coordinated procurement,  Directories, Site
   Enforcement Tracking System, Superfund, Remedial action,
   Potentially responsible parties.
  0821  Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
   Listing by Site for Wisconsin
   Order Number PB91-170753CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
   Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
   Waste Programs Enforcement; 5 Apr 91
   When  expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
    hensive Environmental Response, Compensation  and Liabil-
    ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
    with potential financial responsibility for remediation of  un-
    controlled hazardous waste sites.  EPA  regional Superfund
    Waste Management Staff issued a notice letter to the poten-
    tially responsible party (PRP). Data from this notice letter is
    used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
    This data includes PRP name and  address, a company con-
    tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
    CERCLA site name  and identification number.  SETS was
    created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
    ority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS  does  not address the
    range  of other administrative duties related to tracking the
    PRP.  Tna Site report is designed to provide PRP information
    linked by the associated site, which appears according to the
    state where the site is located.
    Specifications: Also available  in set of 6  reports  PC E99/
    MF E99, PB91-170696. Supersedes PB91-130831.  See  also
    PB91-170746. 58p.
    Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste  dis-
     posal, Superfund,  Notification procedures, Directories,  Wis-
     consin, Site Enforcement Tracking System,  Potentially re-
     sponsible parties.
0822  Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
  Listing by Site for Wyoming
  Order Number PB90-243379CDH, price: PC A01 /MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Waste Programs Enforcement; 2 Aug 90
  When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
  hensive Environmental Response, Compensation  and Liabil-
  ity Act)  site, EPA must conduct  a search to identify parties
  with potential financial  responsibility  for remediation of un-
  controlled hazardous waste  sites. EPA  regional  Superfund
  Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter tc.the^poten-
  tially responsible party (PRP). Data from this  no ice letter s
  used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
  The data includes PRP name and address  a company con-
  tact person, the date the  notice  was issued  and  the related
  CERCLA  site  name and identification number  SETS was
  created to track PRP identification at both  NPL (National Pn-
  ority  List) and non-NPL sites. SETS does not address  he
   range of  other administrative duties related f ^ta"9  *f
   PRP These lists (updated quarterly) represent EPAs prelimi-
   nary findings on the identities of V*^*™**^^
   ties Inclusion on these lists does not constitute a final deter-
   mination concerning the liability of any party for the hazard or
   examination at any CERCLA site  The s,t e report is.de-
   signed to provide PRP information linked by the associated
   site, which appears according to Wyoming where the site is
   located.
   Specifications: Also available in set of 6 reports PC E99/
   MF E99,  PB90-243312. See also PB90-243361. 5p.
   Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste  dis-
   posal,  Wyoming, Coordinated procurement  Directories,  Site
   Enforcement Tracking System,  Superfund, Remedial action.
  0823  Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
    Listing by Site for Wyoming
    Order Number PB91-131060CDH, price: PC A01/MF A01
    Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
    Waste Programs Enforcement; 19 Dec 90
    When expending  Superfund  monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
    hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
    ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
    with potential financial  responsibility for remediation of  un-
    controlled hazardous waste sites.  EPA  regional Superfund
    Waste  Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
    tially responsible  party (PRP) for the state of Wyoming. Data
    from this notice letter is used to form the Site•Entawrnert
    Tracking  System (SETS). This data includes PRP name  and
    aSess9  a company contact person, the date the no ice  was
    fssued, and the related CERCLA site name and identification
    number.  SETS was  created to track PRP identi,cation at
    both NPL (National Priority List)  and  non-NPL  sites  SETS
    does not address the range of other administrative duties re-
    lated to tracking the PRP.
    Specifications: Also available  in set  of 6  reports PC E99/
     MFE99, PB91-131003. Supersedes PB90-243379. See  also
     PB91-131052. 5p.
     Subject index keywords: Hazardous  materials,  Wyoming
     Waste disposal, Coordinated  procurement, Directories, Site
     Enforcement Tracking System, Superfund,  Remedial  action,
     Potentially responsible parties.
    152

-------
                                                                      PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Enforcement
  0824  Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)- PRP
    Listing by Site for Wyoming
    Order Number PB91-170936CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
    Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
    Waste Programs Enforcement; 5 Apr 91
    When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
    hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
    ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to  identify parties
    with potential  financial  responsibility for  remediation  of un-
    controlled hazardous waste  sites. EPA regional Superfund
    Waste Management Staff issued a notice letter to the poten-
    tially responsible party (PRP). Data from this  notice letter is
    used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)
    This data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
    tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
    QERCLA site  name  and identification number. SETS  was
    created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
    ority List) and non-NPL  sites. SETS does not address the
    range of other administrative  duties related to tracking the
   PRP. The site report is designed to provide PRP information
   linked by the associated site, which appears according to the
   state where the site is located.
   Specifications: Also  available in  set of  6 reports PC  E99/
   MF E99, PB91-170878. Supersedes PB91-131060. See  also
   PB91-170928. 7p.
   Subject index keywords:  Hazardous  materials, Waste dis-
   posal, Superfund, Notification procedures, Directories, Wyo-
   ming, Site Enforcement Tracking  System, Potentially respon-
   sible parties.

 0825  Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
   National Frequency by Party Name, January 22,1992
   Order Number PB92-139518CDH, price: Call for price
   Environmental Protection Agency, Washington,  DC. Office of
   Waste Programs Enforcement; 22 Jan 92
   When  expending Superfund monies at a  CERCLA (Compre-
   hensive  Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
   ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
   with potential  financial responsibility for  remediation of un-
   controlled hazardous  waste sites.  EPA regional Superfund
   Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
   tially responsible party (PRP). Data from  the notice  letter is
   used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System  (SETS)
   The data includes PRP name and address, a company  con-
   tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
   CERCLA site  name  and identification number.  SETS  was
   created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
   ority List) and non-NPL  sites. SETS does not address  the
   range of other  administrative duties related  to tracking  the
   PRP.
  Specifications: Supersedes PB92-105360. 4130p.
  Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste dis-
  posal, Directories, Site Enforcement Tracking System, Poten-
  tially responsible parties, Superfund.

0826  Site Enforcement Tracking System  (SETS): PRP
  National  Listing Alphabetically by Party  Name
  Order Number PB90-242850CDH, price:  Call for price
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Waste Programs Enforcement; 2 Aug 90
  When expending Superfund  monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
  hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
  ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
  with potential  financial responsibility for remediation of un-
   controlled hazardous waste  sites. EPA regional Superfund
   Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
   tially responsible party (PRP). Data from this notice letter is
   used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking  System (SETS).
   The data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
   tact person, the date the notice was  issued, and the related
   CERCLA site  name  and identification number.  SETS was
   created to track PRP identification at  both NPL (National Pri-
   ority List)  and non-NPL  sites. SETS does  not address the
   range of other administrative duties  related to tracking the
   PRP. These lists (updated quarterly) represent EPA's prelimi-
   nary findings on the identities of potentially responsible par-
   ties. Inclusion on these lists does not  constitute a final deter-
   mination concerning the liability of any party for the hazard or
   contamination at any CERCLA site. The alpha report lists the
   PRPs  in alphabetical order and links the records  with the
   site(s) where potential liability  is associated.
   Specifications: 2395p.
   Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste dis-
   posal, Industries, Coordinated procurement,  Directories, Site
   Enforcement Tracking System, Superfund, Remedial action.

 0827  Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
   National Listing Alphabetically by Party Name
   Order Number PB91-130492CDH, price: Call for price
   Environmental Protection  Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
   Waste Programs Enforcement; 19 Dec 90
   When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
   hensive  Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
   ity Act) site,  EPA must conduct a search  to  identify parties
   with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
   controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional  Superfund
   Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
   tially responsible party (PRP).  Data  from this notice letter is
   used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
   This data includes PRP name  and address, a company con-
   tact  person, the date the  notice was issued,  and the related
   CERCLA site name  and identification number. SETS  was
   created to track PRP  identification at both NPL (National Pri-
   ority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS does not address the
   range of other  administrative  duties related  to tracking the
   PRP.
  Specifications: Supersedes PB90-242850. 2565p.
  Subject  index  keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste dis-
  posal, Coordinated procurement,  Directories, Site  Enforce-
  ment Tracking System, Superfund, Remedial  action, Poten-
  tially responsible parties.

0828   Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
  National Listing Alphabetically by Party Name
  Order Number PB91-170415CDH, price: Call for price
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Waste Programs Enforcement;  5 Apr 91
  When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
  hensive  Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
  ity Act) site,  EPA must conduct a search to  identify parties
  with  potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
  controlled hazardous  waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
  Waste Management Staff issued a notice letter to the poten-
  tially  responsible party (PRP). Data from this notice letter is
  used  to -form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
  This data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
  tact person, the  date the notice was issued, and,the related
                                                                                                               153

-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Enforcement
  CERCLA site name and  identification number. SETS was
  created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
  ority List)  and non-NPL sites. SETS does" not address the
  range of other administrative duties related to tracking the
  PRP. The alpha report lists the PRPs in alphabetical order
  and links the records with the site(s) where potential liability
  is associated.
  Specifications: Supersedes PB91-130492. 2753p.
  Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste dis-
  posal,  Superfund, Notification procedures,  Directories,  Site
  Enforcement Tracking System.
0829  Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
  National Listing Alphabetically by Party Name
  Order Number PB93-134187CDH, price: Call for price
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Waste Programs Enforcement; 8 Dec 92
  When  expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
  hensive Environmental Response,  Compensation and Liabil-
  ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search  to identify parties
  with potential financial responsibility for remediation  of un-
  controlled hazardous  waste sites.  EPA regional Superfund
  Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
  tially responsible party (PRP). Data from this  notice letter is
  used to form the Site  Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
  This data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
  tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
  CERCLA  site name  and identification  number.  SETS was
  created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
  ority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS  does not address the
  range  of  other administrative duties related to tracking the
  PRP.
  Specifications:  Supersedes PB92-220136. 5887p.
  Subject  index  keywords:  Superfund,  Remedial  action,
  Waste disposal, Directories, Hazardous materials, Site En-
  forcement Tracking System, Potentially responsible parties.

 0830  Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
   National Listing Alphabetically by Party Name
   Order Number PB93-177129CDH, price: Call for price
   Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
   Waste Programs Enforcement; Apr 93
   When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
   hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
   ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
   with potential financial responsibility  for remediation of un-
   controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
   Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
   tially responsible party (PRP). Data from the notice letter is
   used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
   The data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
   tact person, the date the notice was  issued,  and the related
   CERCLA site name and identification  number.
   Specifications: Supersedes PB93-134187. SOOOp.
   Subject  index keywords:  Law enforcement, Hazardous ma-
   terials, Sites, Superfund, Waste management, Potential re-
   sponsible party.
0831  Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
  National Listing Alphabetically by Party Name, January
  22, 1992
  Order Number PB92-139526CDH, price: PC A09
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Waste Programs Enforcement; 22 Jan 92
  When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
  hensive Environmental Response, Compensation  and Liabil-
  ity Act)  site, EPA must  conduct a  search to identify parties
  with  potential financial  responsibility for remediation of un-
  controlled  hazardous waste sites.  EPA  regional  Superfund
  Waste Management Staff  issue a notice letter to the poten-
  tially responsible party (PRP). Data from the notice letter is
  used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
  The data includes PRP  name and  address, a company con-
  tact person, the date the notice was issued, and  the related
  CERCLA site  name  and  identification number.  SETS was
  created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
  ority List) and non-NPL sites.
  Specifications: Supersedes PB92-105345. 184p.
  Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials,  Waste dis-
  posal, Directories, Superfund, Potentially responsible parties,
  USEPA regions 1-10.
 0832  Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
  National Listing by Site
  Order Number PB90-242843CDH, price: Call for price
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Water
  and Land Div;  2 Aug 90
  When expending  Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
  hensive Environmental  Response,  Compensation and Liabil-
  ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search  to identify parties
  with  potential  financial  responsibility for remediation  of un-
  controlled  hazardous waste  sites.  EPA regional Superfund
  Waste  Management  Staff issue a  notice letter to the poten-
  tially responsible  party  (PRP). Data from this notice letter is
   used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
  The data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
  tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
   CERCLA  site name and identification  number.  SETS was
   created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
   ority List)  and non-NPL sites.  SETS does not address the
   range of other administrative duties related to tracking the
   PRP. These lists  (updated quarterly) represent EPA's prelimi-
   nary findings on the identities of potentially responsible par-
   ties.  Inclusion on these lists does not constitute a final deter-
   mination concerning the liability of  any party for the  hazard or
   contamination at any  CERCLA site. The  site report  is de-
   signed to  provide PRP information linked by the associated
   site, which appears  according to the state where the  site is
   located.
   Specifications: 2290p.
   Subject index keywords:  Hazardous materials, Waste dis-
   posal,  Coordinated  procurement,   Directories, Site Enforce-
   ment Tracking System, Superfund, Remedial action.

  0833  Site Enforcement Tracking  System (SETS): PRP
   National Listing by Site
   Order  Number PB91-131334CDH,  price: Call for price
   Environmental Protection Agency,  Washington, DC. Office  of
   Waste Programs Enforcement; 19 Dec 90
   When expending Superfund monies at  a  CERCLA (Compre-
   hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
  154

-------
                                                                       PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Enforcement
    ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
    with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
    controlled  hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
    Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
    tially responsible party (PRP). Data from this notice letter is
    used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)
    This data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
    r^L£?rf°n' the date the notice was issued- and the related
    OERCLA  site name and identification  number. SETS was
    created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
    ority List) and  non-NPL sites.  SETS does not address the
    Daoie-ru    er administrative duties related to tracking the
    PRP. These lists (updated quarterly) represent EPA's prelimi-
    nary findings on the identities of potentially responsible par-
    ties. Inclusion on these lists does not constitute a final deter-
    mination concerning the liability of any party for the hazard or
    contamination at any CERCLA site.
    Specifications: Supersedes PB90-242843. 2446p.
    Subject index  keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste dis-
    posal, Coordinated procurement, Directories, Alabama  Site
    Enforcement  Tracking  System,  Superfund,  Potentially  re-
   sponsible parties, Remedial action.

 0834  Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
   National Listing by Site
   Order Number PB91 -170407CDH, price: Call for price
   Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
   Waste Programs Enforcement; 5 Apr 91
   When expending Superfund  monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
   hensive  Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
   ity Act) site,  EPA must conduct a search to  identify parties
   with potential financial responsibility  for remediation of un-
   controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA  regional Superfund
   Waste Management Staff issued a notice letter to the poten-
   tially responsible party (PRP). Data from this  notice letter is
   used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)
   This data includes PRP name and address, a company  con-
   ^LR?rf°n' the date tne notice was issued- and the related
   OERCLA site  name  and  identification number.  SETS  was
   created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
   ority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS  does not  address  the
   range of other administrative duties related to  tracking  the
   r i  -,I   Slte  report  is des'gned to provide PRP information
   linked by the associated site, which appears according to the
   state where the site is located.
   Specifications:  Supersedes PB91-131334. 2620p.
  Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials,  Waste dis-
  posal, Superfund, Notification procedures, Directories  Site
  Enforcement Tracking System, Potentially responsible  par-
  ties.

0835   Site  Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
  National Listing by Site
  Order Number PB93-134195CDH, price: Call for price
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington,  DC. Office of
  Waste Programs Enforcement; Dec 92
  When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
  hensive Environmental Response, Compensation  and Liabil-
  ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a  search to identify parties
  with potential  financial responsibility for remediation of  un-
  controlled hazardous  waste sites.  EPA regional  Superfund
  Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
  tially  responsible  party (PRP). Data from this notice letter is
  used  to form the  Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)
   This data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
   tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
   CERCLA site  name  and identification number.  SETS was
   created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
   ority List) and non-NPL  sites. SETS does  not address the
   range of other administrative  duties related to trackinq the
   PRP.

   Specifications:  Set includes PB93-134203 through  PB93-
   134294. Supersedes PB92-220128. 11542p-in 10v.
   Subjeclt  index  keywords:  Superfund,  Remedial  action,
   Waste  disposal,  Directories, Hazardous materials, Site En-
   forcement Tracking System, Potentially responsible parties.

 0836   Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
   National Listing by Site
   Order Number PB93-177137CDH, price: Call  for price
   Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
   Waste Programs Enforcement; Apr 93
   When expending  Superfund monies  at a CERCLA (Compre-
   hensive  Environmental Response,  Compensation and Liabil-
   ity Act)  site,  EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
   with potential financial responsibility for remediation  of un-
   controlled hazardous  waste  sites. EPA regional  Superfund
   Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the  poten-
   tially  responsible party (PRP). Data from the notice letter is
   used  to form the. Site Enforcement Tracking  System (SETS).
   The data includes PRP name and  address, a company  con-
   tact person,  the date the notice was issued,  and the related
   CERCLA site name and identification  number.
   Specifications:  Set includes PB93-177145 through  PB93-
   177236. Supersedes PB93-134195. 6767p-in  10v.
  Subject  index keywords:  Law  enforcement, Superfund,
  Sites, Waste management, Potential responsible party.

0837  Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
  National Listing by Site, January 22, 1992
  Order Number PB92-139500CDH, price: Call for price
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC.  Office of
  Waste Programs Enforcement; 22 Jan 92
  When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA  (Compre-
  hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
  ity Act) site,  EPA must conduct a search to  identify parties
  with potential financial responsibility  for remediation  of un-
  controlled  hazardous  waste  sites.  EPA  regional Superfund
  Waste Management Staff issue  a notice  letter to the poten-
  tially responsible party (PRP). Data from the  notice letter is
  used to form  the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
  The data  includes PRP name and address, a company con-
  tact person, the  date the notice  was issued, and the related
  CERCLA  site  name and identification number. SETS  was
  created to track  PRP identification at both NPL (National  Pri-
  ority List) and non-NPL sites.
  Specifications:  Supersedes PB92-105352. 3346p.
  Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste dis-
  posal,  Directories, Superfund, Potentially responsible parties
  USEPA regions 1-10.
                                                                                                              155

-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Enforcement
0838  Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
  Report by Site for Region 1, September 26,1991
  Order Number PB92-105246CDH, price: PC A21
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Waste Programs Enforcement; 26 Sep 91
  When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
  hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
  ity Act)  site, EPA must conduct a  search to identify parties
  with potential financial  responsibility for remediation  of un-
  controlled hazardous waste sites.  EPA regional Superfund
  Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the  poten-
  tially responsible party (PRP). Data from the notice letter  is
  used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
  The data includes PRP name and  address, a company con-
  tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
  CERCLA site name  and identification number.  SETS was
  created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
  ority List) and non-NPL sites.  SETS does not  address the
  range of other  administrative duties related to  tracking the
  PRP. The site report is designed to provide PRP information
  linked by the associated site, which appears according to the
  state where the site is  located. Region 1 includes Connecti-
  cut, Massachusetts, Maine, New  Hampshire, Rhode Island
  and Vermont.
  Specifications:   Supersedes  PB92-215194 through PB91-
  215244 and PB91-215806. See also PB92-105337. 499p.
  Subject Index  keywords: Superfund,  Waste disposal, Haz-
  ardous  materials,  Directories,  Site  Enforcment  Tracking
  System, Potentially responsible parties, EPA region 1.

 0839  Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
   Report by Site for Region 2, September 26, 1991
   Order Number PB92-105253CDH, price: PC A09
   Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
   Waste Programs Enforcement;  26 Sep 91
   When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
   hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
   ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
   with  potential financial  responsibility for remediation of un-
   controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
   Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
   tially responsible party (PRP).  Data from the notice  letter is
   used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System  (SETS).
   The  data includes PRP name  and address, a company con-
   tact  person, the date the notice was issued,  and the related
   CERCLA site name and identification number. SETS was
   created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
   ority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS does not address the
   range  of other  administrative  duties related to tracking the
   PRP. The site report is designed to provide PRP information
   linked by the associated site, which appears according to the
   state where the site is located. Region 2 includes New
   Jersey, New York, Puerto Rico, and Virgin Islands.
   Specifications:   Supersedes PB91-215251  through PB91-
   215277 and PB91-170530. See also PB92-105246. 196p.
   Subject index  keywords: Superfund, Waste disposal, Haz-
   ardous materials, Directories, Site Enforcement  Tracking
   System, Potentially responsible parties, EPA region 2.
                                                   i  'i<
0840  Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
  Report by Site for Region 3, September 26, 1991
  Order Number PB92-105261CDH, price: PC A16
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Waste Programs Enforcement; 26 Sep 91
  When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
  hensive Environmental Response, Compensation  and Liabil-
  ity Act) site, EPA must  conduct a  search to identify parties
  with potential financial  responsibility for remediation of  un-
  controlled  hazardous waste sites.  EPA  regional  Superfund
  Waste Management Staff  issue a notice letter to  the poten-
  tially responsible party (PRP). Data from the notice letter  is
  used to form the Site Enforcement  Tracking System (SETS).
  The data includes PRP  name and  address, a company con-
  tact person, the date the notice was issued, and  the related
  CERCLA site name  and  identification number.  SETS was
  created to track PRP identification  at both NPL (National Pri-
  ority List)  and non-NPL sites. SETS does not address the
  range of other  administrative duties related to tracking the
  PRP. The site report is  designed to provide PRP  information
  linked by the associated site,  which appears according to the
  state where the site is located. Region 3 includes Delaware,
  District of Columbia*, Maryland, Pennsylvania, Virginia,  and
  West Virginia.
  Specifications:   Supersedes PB91-215285 through  PB91-
  215335. See also PB92-105253. 357p.
  Subject index  keywords: Superfund, Waste disposal, Haz-
  ardous materials, Directories,  Site Enforcement  Tracking
  System, Potentially responsible parties, EPA region 3.

 0841  Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
   Report by Site for Region 4, September 26, 1991
   Order Number PB92-105279CDH, price:  PC A11
   Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
   Waste Programs Enforcement; 26 Sep 91
   When expending Superfund  monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
   hensive Environmental  Response,  Compensation and Liabil-
   ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
   with  potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
   controlled  hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
   Waste Management Staff issue a  notice letter to the poten-
   tially responsible party (PRP). Data from the notice letter is
   used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
   The  data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
   tact person, the date the  notice was issued, and the related
   CERCLA site  name and identification  number. SETS was
   created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
   ority List)  and non-NPL  sites. SETS does not  address the
   range of other administrative duties  related to  tracking the
   PRP. The site  report is designed to provide PRP information
   linked by the associated site, which appears according to the
   state where the  site is located. Region 4 includes Alabama,
   Florida, Georgia, Kentucky, Mississippi, North Carolina, South
   Carolina, and Tennessee.
   Specifications:   Supersedes PB91-215343 through  PB91-
   215426. See also PB92-105261. 248p.
   Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste disposal, Haz-
   ardous materials,  Directories, Site  Enforcement  Tracking
   System, Potentially responsible parties,  EPA region 4.
  156

-------
                                                                     PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Enforcement
 0842  Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
   Report by Site for Region 5, September 26, 1991
   Order Number PB92-105287CDH, price: Call for price
   Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
   Waste Programs Enforcement; 26 Sep 91
   When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
   hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
   ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
   with potential  financial  responsibility for remediation of un-
   controlled hazardous waste  sites. EPA regional Superfund
   Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
   tially responsible party (PRP). Data from the notice letter is
   used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)
   The data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
   tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
   CERCLA site  name  and  identification number. SETS was
   created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
   ority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS does not address the
   range of other administrative duties related to tracking the
   PRP. The site report is designed to provide PRP information
   linked by the associated site, which appears according to the
   state where the site is located. Region 5 includes Illinois, In-
   diana, Michigan, Minnesota, Ohio, and Wisconsin.
  Specifications:  Supersedes  PB91-215434 through PB91-
  215491. See also PB92-105279. 639p.
  Subject index keywords: Superfund,  Waste disposal, Haz-
  ardous  materials, Directories, Site Enforcement  Tracking
  System, Potentially responsible parties, EPA region 5.

0843  Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
  Report by Site for Region 6, September 26, 1991
  Order  Number PB92-105295CDH, price: PC A12
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Waste Programs Enforcement; 26 Sep 91
  When  expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
  hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
  ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search  to identify parties
  with potential  financial responsibility for remediation  of un-
  controlled hazardous waste sites.  EPA regional Superfund
  Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
  tially responsible party (PRP).  Data from the notice letter is
  used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
  The data includes PRP name  and address, a company con-
  tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
  CERCLA site  name and identification number. SETS was
  created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
  ority List) and non-NPL  sites. SETS does not address the
  range of other administrative  duties related to tracking the
  PRP. The site report is designed to provide PRP information
  linked by the associated site, which appears according to the
  state where the site  is located. Region  6 includes Arkansas,
  Louisiana, New Mexico, Oklahoma, and Texas.
  Specifications:  Supersedes  PB91-215509 through PB91-
  215558. See also PB92-105287. 270p.
  Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste disposal, Haz-
  ardous materials, Directories,  Site  Enforcement  Tracking
 System, Potentially responsible parties, EPA region 6.
 0844  Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
   Report by Site for Region 7, September 26, 1991
   Order Number PB92-105303CDH, price: PC A12
   Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
   Waste Programs Enforcement; 26 Sep 91
   When expending Superfund  monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
   hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
   ity Act) site, EPA  must conduct a search to identify parties
   with  potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
   controlled hazardous waste sites.  EPA  regional  Superfund
   Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
   tially responsible party (PRP). Data from the notice letter is
   used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
   The data includes  PRP name and address, a company con-
   tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
   CERCLA  site name and identification number.  SETS was
   created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
   ority  List) and non-NPL sites. SETS does not address the
   range of  other administrative duties related to tracking the
   PRP. The site report is designed to provide PRP  information
   linked by the associated site, which appears according to the
   state where  the site is  located. Region 7 includes Iowa,
   Kansas, Missouri, and Nebraska.
   Specifications:  Supersedes PB91-215566 through PB91-
   215608. See also PB92-105295. 261 p.
   Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste disposal, Haz-
   ardous materials,  Directories, Site  Enforcement Tracking
   System, Potentially responsible parites, EPA region 7.

 0845  Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
   Report by Site for Region 8, September 26, 1991
   Order Number PB92-105311CDH, price: PC A06
   Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
   Waste Programs Enforcement; 26 Sep 91
   When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
   hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
   ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
   with potential  financial responsibility for remediation  of un-
   controlled hazardous waste sites.  EPA  regional  Superfund
   Waste Management Staff  issue a notice letter to the  poten-
  tially responsible party (PRP).  Data from the notice letter is
   used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
  The data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
  tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the  related
  CERCLA site name and identification number.
  Specifications:  Supersedes  PB91-215616 through  PB91-
  215673. See also PB92-105303. 112p.
  Subject index keywords:  Sites, Hazardous materials.
0846  Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
  Report by Site for  Region 9, September 26, 1991
  Order Number PB92-105329CDH, price: PC A12
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Waste Programs Enforcement; 26 Sep 91
  When expending Superfund monies at a  CERCLA (Compre-
  hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and  Liabil-
  ity  Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify  parties
  with potential  financial responsibility for remediation  of  un-
  controlled  hazardous  waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
  Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the  poten-
  tially responsible party (PRP). Data from  the notice letter is
  used to form the Site  Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
  The data includes PRP name  and address, a company con-
                                                                                                             157

-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Enforcement
  tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
  CERCLA site name and  identification number. SETS was
  created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
  ority List)  and non-NPL sites. SETS does not address the
  range of other administrative duties related to tracking the
  PRP. The  site report is designed to provide PRP information
  linked by the associated site, which appears according to the
  state where the site is located. Region 9 includes American
  Samoa, Arizona, California, Guam, Hawaii, Midway, Nevada,
  Northern Marianas,  Pacific  Islands*,  Trust Territories,  and
  Wake Island.
  Specifications:  Supersedes  PB91-215681 through  PB91-
  215749. See also PB92-105311. 269p.
  Subject Index keywords: Superfund, Waste  disposal, Haz-
  ardous  materials,  Directories,  Site  Enforcement  Tracking
  System, Potentially responsible parties, EPA region 9.

0847  Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
  Report by Site for Region 10, September 26, 1991
  Order Number PB92-105337CDH, price: PC A09
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Waste Programs Enforcement; 26 Sep 91
  When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
  hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
  ity Act) site,  EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
  with potential financial  responsibility for remediation  of  un-
  controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional  Superfund
  Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
  tially responsible party (PRP). Data from the  notice letter is
  used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
  The data  includes PRP name  and address, a company con-
  tact person, the date the  notice was issued, and the related
  CERCLA  site name and identification  number.  SETS was
  created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
  ority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS  does not address  the
  range  of  other administrative  duties related to tracking  the
  PRP. The site report is designed to provide PRP information
  linked by the associated site, which appears according to the
  state where the site is located. Region  10 includes Alaska*,
  Idaho, Oregon, and  Washington.
  Specifications:     Supersedes  PB91-215756  and  PB91-
  215772 through PB91-215798. See also PB92-105329. 180p.
  Subject Index keywords: Superfund, Waste disposal, Haz-
  ardous materials,   Directories,  Site  Enforcement Tracking
  System, Potentially responsible parties, EPA region 10.  ,

 0848  Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP Site
  Listing by Site for Virginia
  Order Number PB90-243023CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
  Environmental Protection  Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Waste Programs Enforcement; 2 Aug 90
  When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
  hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and  Liabil-
  ity Act) site, EPA must conduct  a search to  identify parties
  with potential financial responsibility  for remediation of un-
  controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
  Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
   tially responsible party (PRP). Data from this notice letter  is
   used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
  The data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
   tact person,  the date the notice was  issued, and the related
   CERCLA site name and identification number.  SETS  was
   created to track PRP identification at  both NPL (National Pri-
   ority List) and  non-NPL  sites. SETS does not address the
  range  of other administrative duties related to tracking the
  PRP. These lists (updated quarterly) represent EPA's prelimi-
  nary findings on the identities of potentially responsible par-
  ties. Inclusion on these lists does not constitute a final deter-
  mination concerning the liability of any party for the hazard or
  contamination at any CERCLA site. The site report is de-
  signed to provide PRP information linked by the assocjated
  site, which appears according to Virginia where the site is lo-
  cated.
 , Specifications: Also available in set of  5 reports PC E99/
  MF E99,  PB90-242983. See  also PB90-243015 and PB90-
  243031. 24p.
  Subject index  keywords: Hazardous  materials, Virginia,
  Waste disposal, Coordinated procurement, Directories, Site
  Enforcement Tracking  System, Superfund, Remedial  action.

0849  Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS) (Region 1
  - 3 1/2 Inch Diskette IBM PS/2 Compatible) (for
  Microcomputers)
  Order Number PB92-500131CDH, price: D01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Waste Programs Enforcement; Oct 91
  When expending Superfund monies  at a CERCLA (Compre-
  hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and  Liabil-
  ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
  with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
  controlled hazardous waste  sites.  EPA  regional  Superfund
  Waste Management Staff  issue a notice letter to the poten-
  tially responsible party (PRP). Data  from the notice letter is
  used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
  The data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
  tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
  CERCLA site name  and  identification number. SETS was
  created by EPA to track PRP identification at both NPL (Na-
  tional Priority List)  and non-NPL sites. SETS does not ad-
  dress the  range of  other .administrative  duties  related to
  tracking the PRP. These  lists (updated  quarterly) represent
  EPA's  preliminary findings on the identities of PRPs. Inclu-
  sion on these lists does not constitute a final determination
  concerning the  liability of any party for the  hazard or con-
  tamination at any CERCLA site. Region 1 includes Connecti-
  cut, Maine,  Massachusetts, New  Hampshire,  Rhode Island,
  and Vermont.
 , Specifications: The datafile  is on one,  3  1/2 inch  diskette,
   1.44M high density. File format ASCII.  System:  IBM PS/2;
   MS DOS  3.3 operating system, 640K. Other formats avail-
   able as IBM (or compatible) 5 1/4 inch -  PB90-502618. 1 dis-
   kette.
   Subject  index keywords: Data file, Hazardous materials,
   Waste disposal, Superfund, Remedial action, Directories, Site
   Enforcement Tracking System, Potentially responsible  par-
   ties, EPA region  1.

 0850  Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS) (Region
   1) (for Microcomputers)
   Order Number PB90-502618CDH, price:  D01
   Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
   Waste Programs Enforcement; Aug 90
   When expending Superfund  monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
   hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
   ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to  identify  parties
   with potential  financial responsibility for remediation of  un-
   controlled  hazardous waste sites.  EPA regional Superfund
 158

-------
                                                                     PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Enforcement
  Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
  tially responsible party (PRP). Data from this notice letter is
  used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking  System (SETS).
  This data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
  tact person, the date the notice was issued,  and the related
  CERCLA site  name  and identification number.  SETS was
  created by  EPA to track PRP identification at both NPL (Na-
  tional Priority List)  and non-NPL  sites. SETS does not ad-
  dress the  range of  other administrative  duties related to
  tracking the PRP.  These lists represent EPA's  preliminary
  findings on the identities of  PRPs. Inclusion on these lists
  does not constitute a final determination concerning the li-
  ability of any party for the hazard or contamination at any
  CERCLA site. Region 1 includes Connecticut, Maine, Massa-
  chusetts, New Hampshire, Rhode Island, and  Vermont.
  Specifications: The datafile is contained on two 1.2M, 51/4
  inch diskettes,  high density. File format: ASCII. System: IBM
  PC/AT; MS DOS 3.3 operating system, 640K. 2 diskettes.
  Subject index keywords: Data  file, Hazardous materials,
  Superfund,  Remedial  action, Region 1,  Waste management.

0851  Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS) (Region 2
  - 3 1/2 Inch Diskette IBM PS/2 Compatible) (for
  Microcomputers)
  Order Number PB92-500149CDH, price: D01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Waste Programs Enforcement; Oct 91
  When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
  hensive Environmental Response, Compensation  and Liabil-
  ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to  identify parties
  with potential financial responsibility  for remediation of un-
  controlled hazardous  waste sites.  EPA regional  Superfund
  Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to  the poten-
  tially responsible party (PRP). Data from the  notice letter is
  used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
  The data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
  tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
  CERCLA  site name and identification  number. SETS was
  created by EPA to track PRP  identification at both NPL (Na-
  tional Priority List)  and non-NPL sites.  SETS does not ad-
  dress the range of other  administrative  duties  related to
  tracking the PRP. These lists (updated quarterly) represent
  EPA's  preliminary findings on the identities of PRPs. Inclu-
  sion on these lists does not constitute a final determination
  concerning the liability of any party for the hazard  or con-
  tamination at any  CERCLA site.  Region  2  includes  New
  Jersey,  New York, Puerto Rico, and Virgin  Islands*.  There
  are no sites  in this territory at this time.
  Specifications: The datafile is on one,  3 1 /2 inch diskette,
  1.44M  high  density. File format: ASCII.  System: IBM PS/2;
  MS DOS 3.3 operating system, 640K. Other formats avail-
  able as IBM  (or compatible) 5 1/4 inch -  PB90-502626. 1 dis-
  kette.
  Subject index  keywords:  Data file, Hazardous  materials,
  Waste disposal, Superfund, Remedial action, Directories, Site
  Enforcement Tracking System, Potentially  responsible par-
  ties, EPA region 2.
 0852  Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS) (Region
   2) (for Microcomputers)
   Order Number PB90-502626CDH, price: D01
   Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
   Waste Programs Enforcement; Aug 90
   When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
   hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
   ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to  identify parties
   with potential  financial  responsibility for  remediation of un-
   controlled hazardous waste  sites. EPA  regional Superfund
   Waste Management Staff issue a notice  letter to the poten-
   tially responsible party (PRP). Data from  this  notice  letter is
   used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System  (SETS).
   This data includes PRP name and address, a company  con-
   tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
   CERCLA site  name  and identification number.  SETS  was
   created by EPA to track  PRP identification at  both NPL  (Na-
   tional Priority List)  and non-NPL  sites. SETS does  not ad-
   dress the range of  other administrative duties related to
  tracking the PRP.  These lists represent EPA's  preliminary
  findings on the identities of  PRPs.  Inclusion  on these  lists
   does  not constitute a final determination concerning the li-
  ability of any party for the hazard or contamination at any
  CERCLA site.  Region 2 includes New Jersey,  New York,
   Puerto Rico, and the Virgin Islands.
  Specifications: The datafile is contained on one 1.2M, 5 1/4
  inch diskette,  high density. File format: ASCII. System:  IBM
  PC/AT; MS DOS 3.3 operating system, 640K. 1 diskette.
  Subject index  keywords: Data .file, Hazardous materials,
  Superfund, Remedial action, Region 2, Waste management.

0853  Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS) (Region 3
  - 3 1/2 Inch Diskette IBM PS/2 Compatible) (for
  Microcomputers)
  Order Number PB92-500156CDH, price: D01
  Environmental Protection  Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Waste Programs Enforcement; Oct 91
  When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
  hensive Environmental Response, Compensation  and Liabil-
  ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
  with potential  financial responsibility  for remediation of un-
  controlled hazardous  waste sites. EPA regional  Superfund
  Waste Management Staff issue a  notice letter to  the poten-
  tially responsible party (PRP). Data from the notice letter is
  used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
  The data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
  tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the  related
  CERCLA site  name and identification  number.  SETS was
  created by EPA to track PRP  identification at both NPL (Na-
  tional Priority List) and non-NPL sites.  SETS  does  not  ad-
  dress  the range  of other  administrative duties  related to
  tracking the PRP. These lists (updated quarterly) represent
  EPA's preliminary findings on the identities of PRPs. Inclu-
  sion on these  lists does not constitute a final  determination
  concerning the liability of any party for the hazard  or con-
  tamination at any CERCLA site. Region 3 includes Delaware,
  District of Columbia*, Maryland, Pennsylvania, Virginia and
  West Virginia.  *There are no  sites in this federal district at
  this time.
  Specifications: The datafile is on one,  3  1/2  inch diskette,
  1.44M  high density. File format: ASCII. System:  IBM PS/2;
  MS DOS 3.3 operating system, 640K. Other formats avail-
                                                                                                              159

-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Enforcement
  able as IBM (or compatible) 51/4 inch - PB90-502634. 1 dis-
  kette.
  Subject Index keywords: Data file, Hazardous materials,
  Waste disposal, Superfund, Remedial action, Directories, Site
  Enforcement Tracking System, Potentially responsible  par-
  ties. EPA region 3.

0854  Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS) (Region
  3) (for Microcomputers)
  Order Number PB90-502634CDH, price: D01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Waste Programs Enforcement; Aug 90
  When expending  Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
  hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
  ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a  search to identify parties
  with  potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
  controlled hazardous waste sites.  EPA regional Superfund
  Waste Management Staff Issue a notice letter to the poten-
  tially responsible  party (PRP).  Data from this notice letter is
  used to form the  Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
  This  data includes PRP name  and  address, a company con-
  tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
  CERCLA site name  and identification number. SETS  was
  created by EPA to track PRP identification at both NPL (Na-
  tional Priority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS does not ad-
  dress the range  of  other administrative  duties related to
  tracking the PRP. These lists represent EPA's preliminary
  findings on the identities of PRPs. Inclusion on these lists
  does not constitute a final determination concerning the li-
  ability of any party for the hazard  or contamination at any
  CERCLA site. Region 3 includes Delaware, District of Colum-
  bia, Maryland, Pennsylvania, Virginia, and West Virginia.
  Specifications: The datafile is contained on one 1.2M, 51/4
  inch  diskette, high density. File format: ASCII.  System: IBM
  PC/AT; MS DOS 3.3 operating system, 640K. 1  diskette.
  Subject Index keywords: Data file, Hazardous materials,
  Superfund, Remedial action, Region 3, Waste management.

0855   Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS) (Region 4
  - 3 1/2 Inch Diskette IBM PS/2 Compatible) (for
  Microcomputers)
  Order Number PB92:500164CDH, price: D01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Waste Programs  Enforcement; Oct 91
  When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
  hensive Environmental Response,  Compensation and Liabil-
  ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
  with  potential financial responsibility for remediation  of un-
  controlled hazardous waste sites.  EPA regional Superfund
  Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter  to the poten-
  tially responsible party (PRP). Data from  the notice letter is
  used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
  The  data includes PRP name  and  address, a company con-
  tact person, the date the notice was issued,  and the related
  CERCLA site name  and identification number. SETS was
  created by EPA to track PRP  identification at both NPL (Na-
  tional Priority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS  does  not ad-
  dress the range  of  other administrative  duties related  to
  tracking the PRP. These lists  (updated quarterly) represent
  EPA's  preliminary findings on the  identities  of  PRPs.  Inclu-
  sion on these lists does not  constitute a final  determination
  concerning the liability of any party for the  hazard  or con-
  tamination at any CERCLA site. Region 4 includes Alabama,
  Florida, Georgia, Kentucky, Mississippi, North Carolina, South
  Carolina, and Tennessee.
  Specifications: The datafile is on one, 3 1/2 inch diskette,
  1.44M high density.  File format:  ASCII. System: IBM PS/2;
  MS DOS 3.3  operating system,  640K.  Other formats avail-
  able as IBM (or compatible) 5 1/4 inch - PB90-502642. 1 dis-
  kette.
  Subject index keywords: Data file,  Hazardous materials,
  Waste disposal, Superfund, Remedial action, Directories, Site
  Enforcement Tracking  System,  Potentially responsible par-
  ties, EPA region 4.

0856  Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS) (Region
  4) (for Microcomputers)
  Order Number PB90-502642CDH, price: D01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Waste Programs Enforcement; Aug 90
  When expending  Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
  hensive  Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
  ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
  with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
  controlled hazardous waste sites.  EPA regional Superfund
  Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
  tially responsible  party (PRP). Data from this notice letter is
  used to form the  Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
  This data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
  tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
  CERCLA site name and identification  number. SETS was
  created by EPA to track  PRP identification at both NPL (Na-
  tional  Priority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS does not ad-
  dress the range of other administrative  duties related  to
  tracking the PRP. These lists represent EPA's preliminary
  findings on the identities of PRPs. Inclusion on these lists
  does not constitute  a  final determination concerning the li-
  ability of any party for the hazard or contamination at any
  CERCLA site. Region 4 includes Alabama, Florida, Georgia,
  Kentucky, Mississippi,  North Carolina,  South  Carolina, and
  Tennessee.
  Specifications: The datafile is contained on one 1.2M, 5 1 /4
  inch diskette, high density. File format: ASCII.  System: IBM
  PC/AT; MS DOS  3.3 operating system, 640K. 1  diskette.
  Subject  index keywords:  Data file,  Hazardous materials,
  Superfund,  Region 4, Remedial action,  Waste management.

0857 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS) (Region 5
  - 3 1/2 Inch Diskette IBM PS/2 Compatible) (for
  Microcomputers)
  Order Number PB92-500172CDH, price: D01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Waste Programs  Enforcement; Oct 91
  When expending Superfund monies at  a CERCLA  (Compre-
  hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
  ity Act)  site, EPA must conduct  a search to identify parties
  with potential financial responsibility  for  remediation of un-
  controlled hazardous waste  sites.  EPA regional Superfund
  Waste  Management Staff issue a notice letter  to the poten-
  tially responsible party (PRP). Data from the notice  letter is
  used to form  the Site Enforcement Tracking System  (SETS).
  The data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
  tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
  CERCLA site name and identification number. SETS was
  created by EPA to track PRP identification at both  NPL (Na-
  tional Priority List)  and non-NPL sites. SETS  does  not ad-
 160

-------
                                                                     PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Enforcement
   dress  the range of other administrative duties  related to
   tracking the PR P. These lists  (updated quarterly) represent
   EPA's preliminary findings on  the identities of PRPs. Inclu-
   sion on these lists does not constitute a final determination
   concerning the liability of  any  party for the hazard or con-
   tamination at any CERCLA site. Region 5 includes Illinois, In-
   diana, Michigan, Minnesota, Ohio, and Wisconsin.
   Specifications: The datafile is on one, 3 1/2 inch diskette,
   1.44M high  density.  File format:  ASCII. System: IBM  PS/2;
   MS  DOS 3.3 operating system, 640K. Other  formats avail-
   able as IBM (or compatible) 5 1/4 inch - PB90-502659. 1  dis-
   kette.
   Subject index keywords: Data file, Hazardous materials,
   Waste disposal, Superfund, Remedial action, Directories, Site
   Enforcement Tracking System, Potentially responsible par-
   ties, EPA region 5.

 0858  Site Enforcement Tracking  System (SETS) (Region
   5) (for Microcomputers)
   Order Number PB90-502659CDH, price: D01
   Environmental Protection Agency, Washington,  DC. Office of
   Waste Programs Enforcement; Aug 90
   When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
   hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
   ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
   with potential financial  responsibility for remediation  of  un-
   controlled hazardous waste  sites. EPA regional Superfund
   Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the  poten-
   tially responsible party (PRP). Data from this notice letter is
   used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
   This data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
   tact person,  the date the notice was issued, and the related
   CERCLA site name  and  identification number. SETS was
   created by EPA to track PRP identification at both NPL (Na-
   tional Priority List) and non-NPL  sites. SETS  does not  ad-
   dress the range  of  other administrative  duties related  to
   tracking the PRP. These lists  represent EPA's preliminary
  findings on the identities of  PRPs.  Inclusion  on these lists
   does not constitute a final determination concerning  the li-
   ability of any party for the hazard or contamination at any
  CERCLA site. Region 5 includes  Illinois, Indiana,  Michigan,
   Minnesota, Ohio, and Wisconsin.
  Specifications: The datafile is contained on two 1.2M, 5 1/4
  inch diskettes, high density. File format: ASCII. System: IBM
  PC/AT; MS DOS 3.3 operating system, 640 K. 2 diskettes.
  Subject index keywords: Data  file, Hazardous  materials,
  Superfund, Region 5, Remedial action, Waste management.

0859  Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS) (Region 6
  - 3 1/2 Inch  Diskette IBM PS/2 Compatible) (for
  Microcomputers)
  Order Number PB92-500180CDH, price: D01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Waste Programs Enforcement; Oct 91
  When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
  hensive  Environmental Response, Compensation and  Liabil-
  ity Act) site,  EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
  with potential financial responsibility  for remediation of un-
  controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA  regional Superfund
  Waste Management Staff issue  a  notice letter to the poten-
  tially responsible  party (PRP). Data from the notice letter is
  used to form the  Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
  The data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
  tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
   CERCLA  site name and  identification  number. SETS was
   created by EPA to track PRP identification at both NPL (Na-
   tional  Priority List) and non-NPL sites.  SETS does not ad-
   dress  the range  of other administrative duties  related to
   tracking the  PRP. these lists (updated quarterly) represent
   EPA's preliminary findings on the identities of PRPs. Inclu-
   sion on these lists does not constitute a final determination
   concerning the liability of  any party for the hazard or con-
   tamination at any CERCLA site. Region 6 includes Arkansas,
   Louisiana, New Mexico, Oklahoma, and Texas.
   Specifications: The datafile is on one,  3 1/2 inch diskette,
   1.44M high  density.  File format:  ASCII. System: IBM  PS/2;
   MS DOS  3.3  operating system, 640K. Other  formats avail-
   able as IBM (or compatible) 51/4 inch - PB90-502667. 1  dis-
   kette.
   Subject index keywords: Data file, Hazardous materials,
   Waste disposal, Superfund, Remedial action, Directories, Site
   Enforcement Tracking System, Potentially  responsible par-
   ties, EPA  region 6.

 0860  Site Enforcement Tracking  System (SETS) (Region
   6) (for Microcomputers)
   Order Number PB90-502667CDH, price: D01
   Environmental Protection Agency, Washington,  DC. Office of
   Waste Programs Enforcement; Aug 90
   When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
   hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
   ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
   with potential  financial  responsibility for remediation  of  un-
   controlled  hazardous waste  sites. EPA regional Superfund
   Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the  poten-
   tially responsible party (PRP). Data from this notice letter is
   used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
   This data  includes PRP name and address, a company con-
   tact person,  the date the notice was issued, and the related
   CERCLA  site  name  and  identification number. SETS was
   created by EPA to track PRP identification at both NPL (Na-
   tional  Priority List) and non-NPL  sites. SETS  does not  ad-
   dress the  range  of  other administrative duties related to
  tracking the PRP. These lists represent EPA's preliminary
  findings on the identities of  PRPs.  Inclusion  on these lists
  does not  constitute a final determination concerning  the li-
  ability of any party for the hazard or contamination at any
  CERCLA site.  Region 6 includes  Arkansas, Louisiana, New
   Mexico, Oklahoma, and Texas.
  Specifications: The datafile is contained on one 1.2M, 5 1 /4
  inch diskette, high density. File format: ASCII.  System: IBM
  PC/AT; MS DOS 3.3 operating system, 640K. 1  diskette.
  Subject index keywords: Data  file, Hazardous  materials,
  Superfund, Remedial action, Waste management, Region 6.

0861  Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS) (Region 7
  - 3 1/2 Inch  Diskette IBM PS/2 Compatible) (for
  Microcomputers)
  Order Number PB92-500198CDH, price: D01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Waste Programs Enforcement; Oct 91
  When expending Superfund  monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
  hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and  Liabil-
  ity Act) site,  EPA  must conduct a search to identify parties
  with potential financial responsibility  for remediation of un-
  controlled  hazardous waste sites.  EPA  regional  Superfund
  Waste Management Staff issue a  notice letter to the poten-
                                                                                                               161

-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Enforcement
  tlally responsible party (PRP). Data from this notice letter is
  used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
  This data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
  tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
  CERCLA  site name  and  identification number. SETS was
  created by EPA to track PRP identification at both NPL (Na-
  tional Priority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS does not ad-
  dress the range of  other administrative  duties  related to
  tracking the  PRP. These  lists (updated quarterly)  represent
  EPA's  preliminary findings on the identities of PRPs. Inclu-
  sion on these lists does not constitute a final determination
  concerning the  liability  of any party for the hazard or con-
  tamination at any CERCLA  site. Region  7 includes Iowa,
  Kansas, Missouri, and Nebraska.
  Specifications: The datafile is on one, 31/2 inch diskette,
  1.44M  high density. File format: ASCII. System: IBM PS/2;
  MS D0S 3.3 operating system, 640K. Other formats avail-
  able as IBM (or compatible) 5 1/4 inch - PB90-502675. 1 dis-
  kette.
  Subject Index  keywords: Data file,  Hazardous  materials,
  Waste disposal, Superfund, Remedial action, Directories, Site
  Enforcement Tracking  System, Potentially responsible  par-
  ties, EPA region 7.
0862  Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS) (Region
  7) (for Microcomputers)
  Order Number PB90-502675CDH, price: D01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Waste Programs Enforcement; 31 Jul 90
  When  expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
  hensive Environmental  Response, Compensation and Liabil-
  ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
  with potential financial responsibility for remediation  of  un-
  controlled hazardous waste  sites. EPA regional Superfund
  Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
  tially responsible party  (PRP). Data from this notice letter is
  used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
  This data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
  tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
  CERCLA site  name and  identification number.  SETS was
  created by EPA to track PRP identification at both NPL (Na-
  tional  Priority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS  does not  ad-
  dress  the range of other administrative duties related  to
  tracking the PRP. These lists represent  EPA's preliminary
  findings on the identities of  PRPs. Inclusion on these lists
  does not constitute a final determination concerning the li-
  ability  of any party  for the hazard or contamination  at any
  CERCLA site. Region 7 includes Iowa,  Kansas, Missouri, and
  Nebraska.
  Specifications: The datafile is contained on one 1.2M, 51/4
  inch diskette, high density. File format: ASCII. System: IBM
  PC/AT; MS DOS 3.3 operating system, 640K. 1 diskette.
  Subject  index keywords: Data file,  Hazardous materials,
  Superfund, Remedial action,  Waste management, Region 7.
 0863  Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS) (Region 8
  - 3 1/2 Inch Diskette IBM PS/2 Compatible) (for
  Microcomputers)
  Order Number PB92-500206CDH, price: D01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Waste Programs Enforcement; Oct 91
  When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
  hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and  Liabil-
  ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
  with potential  financial responsibility for remediation of un-
  controlled hazardous  waste sites.  EPA  regional Superfund
  Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
  tially responsible party (PRP). Data from this notice letter is
  used to form the Site  Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
  The data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
  tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
  CERCLA site  name and identification  number. SETS was
  created by EPA to track PRP identification at both NPL (Na-
  tional  Priority  List) and  non-NPL sites.  SETS does not ad-
  dress  the  range  of other  administrative duties related to
  tracking  the PRP. These lists (updated quarterly) represent
  EPA's preliminary findings on the identities of PRPs. Inclu-
  sion on  these lists does not constitute a final determination
  concerning the liability of any party for  the hazard or con-
  tamination at any CERCLA site. Region  8 includes Colorado,
  Montana, North Dakota, South Dakota,  Utah, and Wyoming.
  Specifications: The datafile is on one, 31/2 inch  diskette,
  1.44M high density. File format: ASCII. System: IBM PS/2;
  MS DOS 3.3  operating system, 640K.  Other formats avail-
  able as IBM (or compatible) 5 1/4 inch - PB90-502683. 1 dis-
  kette.
  Subject index keywords: Data file,  Hazardous materials,
  Waste disposal, Superfund,  Remedial action, Directories, Site
  Enforcement Tracking System, Potentially responsible  par-
  ties, EPA region 8.

0864  Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS) (Region
  8) (for Microcomputers)
  Order Number PB90-502683CDH, price: D01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC.  Office of
  Waste Programs Enforcement; 31 Jul 90
  When expending  Superfund monies at a CERCLA  (Compre-
  hensive  Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
  ity Act)  site, EPA must conduct a  search to identify parties
  with potential financial  responsibility for remediation  of un-
  controlled  hazardous  waste  sites.  EPA regional Superfund
  Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
  tially responsible  party (PRP). Data from this  notice letter is
  used to  form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
  This data includes PRP name and  address, a company con-
  tact person, the date  the notice was issued, and the related
  CERCLA site  name  and identification number. SETS was
  created  by EPA to track PRP identification at both NPL (Na-
  tional  Priority List)  and non-NPL sites. SETS does not ad-
  dress the  range of  other administrative  duties related  to
  tracking the PRP.  These lists  represent EPA's preliminary
  findings on the identities of  PRPs. Inclusion on these lists
  does  not constitute a final determination concerning the li-
  ability of any party for the  hazard or contamination  at any
  CERCLA site. Region 8 includes Colorado,  Montana,  North
  Dakota, South Dakota, Utah, and Wyoming.
  Specifications: The datafile is contained on one 1.2M, 5 1/4
  inch  diskette, high density. File format:  ASCII. System: IBM
  PC/AT;  MS DOS 3.3 operating system, 640K.  1 diskette.
  Subject index keywords:  Data file,  Hazardous  materials,
  Superfund, Region 8, Waste management,  Remedial action.
 162

-------
                                                                     PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Enforcement
 0865  Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS) (Region 9
   - 3 1/2 Inch Diskette IBM PS/2 Compatible) (for
   Microcomputers)
   Order Number PB92-500214CDH, price: D01
   Environmental Protection Agency, Washington,  DC. Office of
   Waste Programs Enforcement; Oct 91
   When expending  Superfund monies  at a CERCLA (Compre-
   hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
   ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
   with potential  financial responsibility for  remediation of un-
   controlled hazardous  waste  sites. EPA  regional Superfund
   Waste Management Staff issue a notice  letter to the poten-
   tially responsible party (PRP). Data from  this notice letter is
   used to form the Site  Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
   The data includes PRP name and address, a company  con-
   tact person, the data the notice was issued, and the related
   CERCLA site  name  and identification number.  SETS  was
   created by EPA to track PRP identification at both NPL  (Na-
   tional Priority List) and non-NPL  sites. SETS  does  not ad-
   dress the range  of  other administrative duties related  to
   tracking the PRP. These lists (updated quarterly) represent
   EPA's preliminary findings  on the identities of PRPs. Inclu-
   sion on these  lists does not  constitute a final  determination
   concerning the liability of any party  for the hazard  or  con-
   tamination at any  CERCLA site. Region 9 includes-American
   Somoa,  Arizona,   California,  Guam*,  Hawaii*,  Midway*,
   Nevada,  Northern Marianas,  Pacific  Islands*,  Trust Territo-
   ries, and Wake Island*. *There are no sites in the state/terri-
   tory at this time.
   Specifications: The datafile is on  one, 3  1/2  inch  diskette,
   1.44M high density. .File format: ASCII. System:  IBM PS/2;
  MS DOS 3.3  operating system, 640K.  Other formats avail-
  able as IBM (or compatible) 5 1/4 inch - PB90-502691 1  dis-
  kette.
  Subject index keywords: Data  file, Hazardous materials,
  Waste disposal, Superfund,  Remedial action, Directories,  Site
  Enforcement Tracking System, Potentially  responsible  par-
  ties, EPA region 9.

0866  Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS) (Region
  9) (for Microcomputers)
  Order  Number PB90-502691CDH, price: D01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Waste Programs Enforcement; Aug 90
  When  expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
  hensive  Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
  ity Act) site, EPA  must conduct a search to identify parties
  with potential  financial responsibility  for remediation of  un-
  controlled  hazardous  waste sites.  EPA regional  Superfund
  Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
  tially responsible party (PRP). Data from this notice letter is
  used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
  This data includes  PRP name and address,  a. company con-
  tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
  CERCLA  site  name and identification  number. SETS  was
  created by EPA to track PRP  identification at both NPL (Na-
  tional Priority List) and non-NPL sites.  SETS does  riot  ad-
  dress  the  range  of other  administrative  duties  related ,to
  tracking  the PRP.  These lists represent  EPA's preliminary
  findings on the identities of PRPs. Inclusion on these lists
  does not constitute a final  determination  concerning the li-
  ability of any party for the  hazard  or contamination  at  any
  CERCLA site. Region  9 includes American Somoa, Arizona,
   California,  Guam,  Hawaii, Midway, Nevada,  Northern Mari-
   anas, Pacific Islands, Trust Territories, and Wake Island.
   Specifications: The datafile is contained on one 1.2M, 5 1/4
   inch diskette, high  density. File format: ASCII.  System:  IBM
   PC/AT; MS DOS 3.3 operating system, 640K. 1  diskette.
   Subject index keywords: Data  file,  Hazardous materials,
   Superfund, Remedial action, Region 9, Waste management.

 0867  Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS) (Region
   10-31/2 Inch Diskette IBM PS/2 Compatible) (for
  ' Microcomputers)
   Order Number PB92-500222CDH, price: D01
   Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
   Waste Programs Enforcement; Oct 91
   When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
   hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
   ity Act) site,  EPA must conduct a search to  identify parties
   with potential financial  responsibility for  remediation of  un-
   controlled hazardous waste  sites. EPA  regional Superfund
   Waste Management Staff issue a notice  letter to the poten-
  tially responsible party (PRP). Data from the  notice  letter is
   used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System  (SETS).
  The data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
  tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
  CERCLA site name and identification number. SETS  was
  created by EPA to  track PRP  identification at  both NPL (Na-
  tional Priority List)  and non-NPL  sites. SETS does  not  ad-
  dress the range of other administrative duties related  to
  tracking the PRP. These lists (updated  quarterly) represent
  EPA's preliminary findings on the identities of  PRPs. Inclu-
  sion on these lists  does not  constitute a final determination
  concerning  the liability of any party  for the hazard  or con-
  tamination at any CERCLA site. Region 10 includes Alaska*,
  Idaho, Oregon, and Washington. *There are no sites in this
  state at this time.
  Specifications: The datafile is on one, 3 1/2 inch diskette,
  1-.44M high density. File format: ASCII. System: IBM PS/2;
  MS DOS 3.3 operating system,  640K. Other formats avail-
  able as IBM (or compatible) 5 1 /4 inch - PB90-502709. 1 dis-
  kette.
  Subject index keywords: Data  file, Hazardous materials,
  Waste disposal, Superfund, Remedial action, Directories, Site
  Enforcement  Tracking System, Potentially  responsible par-
  ties, EPA region 10.

0868  Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS) (Region
  10) (for Microcomputers)
  Order Number PB90-502709CDH, price: D01
 '. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office  of
  Waste Programs Enforcement; 31 Jul 90
  When  expending  Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
  hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
  ity Act) site,  EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
  with potential financial responsibility  for remediation of un-
  controlled hazardous waste sites.  EPA regional Superfund
  Waste Management Staff issue a  notice  letter to the poten-
  tially responsible party (PRP).  Data from this notice letter is
  used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
  This data includes PRP name and address,  a  company con-
  tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the  related
  CERCLA  site name and  identification number.  SETS was
  created by EPA to track PRP  identification at both NPL (Na-
  tional Priority  List) and non-NPL sites. SETS  does not ad-
                                                                                                              163

-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Enforcement
  dress  the  range of other administrative duties  related to
  tracking the  PRP. These lists represent EPA's preliminary
  findings on the  identities of  PRPs. Inclusion on these  lists
  does not constitute a final determination concerning the li-
  ability  of any party for the hazard or contamination at any
  CERCLA site. Region  10 includes Alaska, Idaho,  Oregon,
  and Washington.
  Specifications: The datafile is contained on one 1 .2M, 5 1 /4
  inch diskette, high density. File format: ASCII.  System:  IBM
  PC/AT; MS DOS 3.3 operating system, 640K. 1  diskette.
  Subject index  keywords:  Data file, Hazardous materials,
  Superfund, Waste management, Region 10,  Remedial action.

0869  Small Cost Recovery Referrals
  Order Number PB91-139006CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 12 Jul 85
  The directive clarifies EPA policy on referring CERCLA cost
  recovery cases valued at less than $200,000. There are two
  memoranda  attached, the first of which is entitled 'Prepara-
  tion of Hazardous Waste Referrals,' dated July 30, 1985. The
  memorandum provides guidance  on  preparing  referral  pack-
  ages  meeting   Department  of Justice requirements.  The
  second memorandum, entitled 'Small Cost Recovery Refer-
  rals,' dated July 12, 1985, states that although the Agency
  places nigh  priority on  larger cases, there are situations  in
  which cost recovery of small  cases is appropriate.
  Specifications: 10p.
  Subject index  keywords: Superfund, Waste  management,
  Hazardous materials, Office  of Solid Waste and  Emergency
  Response.
 0870 Streamlined Approach for Settlements with De
  Minimis Waste Contributors under CERCLA Section
   Order Number PB93-963617CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
   Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
   Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 30 Jul 93
   The guidance sets forth the Agency's new approach to com-
   pleting de  minimis settlements. The  memorandum expands
   upon the information provided in the 'Superfund Administra-
   tive Improvements - Final Report (June 23,  1993)'. Under
   Section 122(g) of CERCLA the Agency may  settle with per-
   sons who  contributed  to a facility  hazardous  substances
   which are  minimal,  both in terms of volume and toxicity or
   other hazardous  effects, relative to other hazardous  sub-
   stances at  a site. De minimis settlements may only address a
   minor amount of response costs at a site.
   Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
   posit account  required (minimum deposit $225 U.S., Canada,
   and Mexico; all others $450). Single copies also available in
   paper copy or microfiche. See also PB92-963607. 10p.
   Subject index keywords: Superfund, Hazardous  materials,
   Waste disposal, Liabilities.

 0871  Submittal of Ten-Point Settlement Analyses for
   CERCLA Consent Decrees
   Order Number PB91-139485CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
   Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
   Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 11  Aug 89
   The directive memorandum provides guidance to help ensure
   the adequacy of information provided in the 'ten-point' analy-
   ses of proposed CERCLA settlements.
  Specifications:  Portions of this document are not fully legi-
  ble. 33p.
  Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
  Hazardous materials, Office of  Solid Waste and Emergency
  Response.
0872  Summary of 'Guidance of Landowner Liability under
  Section 107(a)1 of CERCLA, De Minimis Settlements
  under Section 122(g)(1)(b) of CERCLA, and Settlements
  with Prospective Purchasers of Contaminated Property'
  Order Number PB91-228288CDH, price: PC A01/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Solid Waste and Emergency Response; May 91
  The Fact Sheet summarizes  when landowners may be eligi-
  ble for a release from liability and when a landowner may  be
  eligible for a  de minimis  settlement.  It also describes the
  agency's policy on  prospective purchasers of contaminated
  property.
  Specifications: 4p.
  Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
  Hazardous materials,  Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
  Response.
0873 Summary of 'Guidance on CERCLA Section 106(a)
  UAOs for RD/RA'
  Order Number PB91-228312CDH, price: PC A01/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office  of
  Solid Waste and Emergency Response; May 91
  The Fact Sheet summarizes the procedures for issuing uni-
  lateral orders  and includes statutory requirements of section
  106 orders, possible recipients of  orders, case-specific con-
  siderations, procedures for issuing  unilateral  orders, and
  what to do in the case of non-compliance with an order.
  Specifications: 4p.
  Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
  Hazardous materials, Office  of Solid Waste  and Emergency
  Response.
0874  Summary of 'Guidance on Documenting Decisions
  Not to Take Cost Recovery Actions'
  Order Number PB91-228338CDH, price: PC A01/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Solid Waste and Emergency Response; May 91
  The Fact Sheet summarizes procedures for documenting a
  decision not to pursue cost recovery actions.
  Specifications: 3p.
  Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
  Hazardous materials, Office of Solid  Waste and Emergency
  Response.
 0875  Summary of Interim Guidance: Streamlining the
  CERCLA Settlement Decision Process'
  Order Number PB91-228270CDH,  price: PC A01/MF A01
   Environmental Protection Agency,  Washington, DC.  Office of
   Solid Waste and Emergency Response; May 91
  The  Fact  Sheet  summarizes the  three  areas  in  which
   changes will  help  improve  and  streamline  the  process for
   conducting settlement discussions. The three areas are  ne-
   gotiation preparation, review  of  settlement decisions,  and
   deadline management.
   Specifications: 4p.
 164

-------
                                                                    PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Enforcement
   Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management
   Hazardous materials, Office of Solid Waste and Emerqencv
   Response.

 0876 Summary of 'Interim Guidelines for Preparinq
   NBARs'
   Order Number PB91-228304CDH, price: PC A01/MF A01
   Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
   Solid Waste and Emergency Response; May 91
   The Fact Sheet  summarizes  the procedures for  preparing
   NBARs, including when to use NBARs, how to prepare them
   and offers bases on NBARs.
   Specifications:  4p.
   Subject index keywords:  Superfund, Waste management,
   Hazardous materials, Office of Solid Waste and Emerqencv
   Response.

 0877  Summary of 'Interim  Policy on CERCLA Settlements
   Involving Municipalities and Municipal Wastes'
   Order Number PB91-228262CDH, price: PC A01/MF A01
   Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC.  Office of
   Solid Waste and Emergency Response; May 91
   The Fact Sheet  addresses a consistent agency-wide  ap-
   proach for addressing municipalities and municipal wastes in
   the Superfund settlement process. The policy also addresses
   settlements with private generators and transporters of haz-
   ardous waste trash derived from a commercial, institutional
   or industrial process or activity.
   Specifications: 4p.
   Subject index keywords:  Superfund, Waste  management,
   Hazardous materials, Office of Solid Waste and  Emerqencv
   Response.

 0878  Summary of 'Methodologies for Implementation of
   CERCLA Section 122(g)(1)(a)  De Minimis Waste
   Contributor Settlements'
   Order Number PB91-227959CDH, price: PC A01/MF A01
   Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
   Solid Waste and Emergency Response; May 91
   The Fact Sheet summarizes the basic steps in forming set-
   tlements with PRPs at a site who are minimal contributors to
   the waste in comparison with other PRPs.  It lists  the criteria
   for eligibility, communication  procedures, timing costs, premi-
   ums, reopeners, and settlement options.
  Specifications:  4p.
  Subject index keywords:  Superfund, Waste management,
  Hazardous materials, Office of  Solid Waste and Emergency
  Response.

0879  Summary of 'PRP Search Supplemental Guidance
  for Sites in the Superfund  Remedial Program'
  Order Number PB91-228320CDH, price: PC A01/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Emergency and Remedial Response; May 91
  The Fact Sheet summarizes the steps involved in a thorough
  PRP Search, including determination of liability, PRP Search
  Planning,  the  PRP Search Process and compilinq  PRP
  Search Reports.
  Specifications: 4p.
  Subject  index keywords: Superfund, Waste  management
  Hazardous  materials, Office  of Solid  Waste and Emergency
  Response.
 0880  Summary of 'Releasing Information to Potentially
   Responsible Parties at CERCLA Sites'
   Order Number PB91-228296CDH, price: PC A01/MF A01
   Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
   Solid Waste and Emergency Response; May 91
   The  Fact Sheet summarizes  EPA's policy on releasing infor-
   mation to PRP's.
   Specifications:  3p.
   Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
   Hazardous materials, Office of  Solid Waste and Emergency
   Response.

 0881   Superfund and Small Waste Contributors
   Order Number PB94-96361OCDH, price: PC A01/MF A01
   Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
   Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Aug 93
   When Congress enacted Superfund, it intended to make the
   polluters pay for  the costs of  cleaning  up these sites. To
   achieve this goal, EPA seeks to hold those parties who con-
   tributed to the contamination  responsible for the cost of
   cleanup. Such parties may be asked to help pay for the
   cleanup of a site even if they acted  in full accordance with
   the law at the time they disposed of the waste.  Superfund
   encourages EPA to settle with these responsible parties out-
   side of court, but also authorizes the Agency to bring actions
   in court to require responsible parties to pay for (or perform)
   the cleanup.
   Specifications: Paper copy available  on Standing  Order, de-
   posit  account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
   and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
   paper copy or microfiche. 2p.
   Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste dis-
   posal, Cleanup, Superfund, Potentially responsible parties.

0882 Superfund Cost Recovery Strategy
   Order Number PB91-139063CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
   Environmental Protection  Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
   Emergency and Remedial Response; 29 Jul 88
   The Superfund cost recovery  strategy provides a framework
   for planning and initiating actions to  recover Federal funds
   expended  in CERCLA response actions. The  directive dis-
   cusses general cost recovery program priorities and provides
   guidelines for setting case priorities for the most efficient use
  of cost recovery resources.
  Specifications:  55p.
  Subject index  keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
  Hazardous materials, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
  Response.

0883  Superfund Enforcement Strategy and
  Implementation Plan
  Order Number PB91-138842CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC.  Office of
.  Emergency and Remedial  Response; 12 Apr 90
  The directive reflects a review of recent studies of the Super-
  fund program, as well as on going management initiatives in-
  volving EPA and the Department of Justice, including the Su-
  perfund Settlement Incentives and Disincentives Workgroup
  and the Superfund Enforcement Management Issues Work-
  group. A list of issues raised in various studies and  reports is
  included as Appendix B.
 Specifications: 67p..
                                                                                                            165

-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Enforcement
  Subject Index keywords:  Superfund, Waste management,
  Hazardous materials, Office of Solid Waste and  Emergency
  Response.
0884  Superfund Information Repositories and
  Administrative Records
  Order Number PB92-963622CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Waste Programs Enforcement; Aug 92
  The fact sheet  discusses two features of EPA's Superfund
  Community Relations  Program:  the  information repository
  and the administrative  record. The fact sheet describes the
  types of information usually contained in the information re-
  pository and  administrative record and  describes how  the
  public can access that information.
  Specifications: Paper copy available  on Standing Order, de-
  posit account required  (minimum deposit  $200 U.S., Canada,
  and Mexico; all  others  $400). Single copies also available in
  paper copy or microfiche. 9p.
  Subject index  keywords:  Superfund, Hazardous materials,
  Waste management, Office of Solid  Waste and Emergency
  Response.
0885  Supplemental Guidance on Federal Superfund Liens
  Order Number PB93-963618CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Emergency and Remedial Response;  29 Jul 93
  The purpose  of the guidance document is to supplement the
  'Guidance  on  Federal Superfund  Liens'  (PB91 -139055)
  issued on September 22, 1987. The Supplement is in addi-
  tion to, and does not supersede the 1987 document, which
  provided criteria for the decision to file  liens under Section
  107 (1) of the Comprehensive  Environmental  Response,
  Compensation,  and Liability Act of 1980 (CERCLA). The Sup-
  plement outlines procedures for Regional staff  to follow to
  provide notice and opportunity to be heard to potentially re-
  sponsible parties on whose property  liens are to be perfect-
  ed.
  Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
  posit account required (minimum deposit $225 U.S., Canada,
  and Mexico;  all others $450). Single  copies also available in
  paper copy or microfiche! See also PB91-139303. 17p.
  Subject index keywords: Superfund, Hazardous materials,
  Waste management, Liens.
 0886  Timely Initiation of Responsible Party Searches,
   Issuance of Notice Letters, and Release of Information
   (Attachment XXII)
   Order Number PB92-102060CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
   Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
   Solid Waste and Emergency  Response; 18 Sep 91
   The directive re-emphasizes the importance of early identifi-
   cation of potentially responsible parties (PRPs) and timely is-
   suance of notice letters for the RI/FS. These actions support
   the Agency's policy to secure cleanup by responsible parties
   In lieu of Superfund use, where such cleanup can be accom-
   plished in a  timely and effective manner. The  sooner PRPs
   are identified and notified  about their potential  responsibility,
   the more time they have  to organize themselves to assure
   responsibility for the  RI/FS and cleanup. It  also clarifies
   Agency policy on release of  site-specific information to PRPs
   and others. It supplements the information release section of
   the Interim CERCLA Settlement Policy (December 5, 1984).
   The  clarification is  designed to facilitate  information  ex-
  change in order to encourage effective negotiation and coa-
  lescing by PRPs among themselves. Effective PRP negotia-
  tions and coalescing are likely to engender effective settle-
  ment discussions with the government.
  Specifications: 7p.
  Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste  man-
  agement, Superfund, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
  Response.
0887  Transmittai of Guidance on Use and Enforcement of
  CERCLA Information Requests and Administrative
  Subpoenas
  Order Number PB91-139170CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 25 Aug 88
  The directive provides an overview of the information gather-
  ing tools under CERCLA section 104(e)  and  122(e)(3), and
  focuses on the steps to be taken throughout the  information
  gathering process to ensure that EPA is in the strongest po-
  sition possible  to enforce the  information gathering or sub-
  poena.  The  guidance replaces existing guidance entitled,
  'Policy  on  Enforcing  Information  Requests  in  Hazardous
  Waste Cases,'  dated September 10, 1984, to the extent that
  the previous guidance addresses information gathering  under
  CERCLA section  104(e), directive no. 9834.4.
  Specifications: 52p.
  Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
  Hazardous materials, Office  of Solid Waste and  Emergency
  Response.
0888   Transmittai of Model Consent Decree for CERCLA
  Section 104(e) Information Request Enforcement Actions
  Order Number  PB91-193417CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
  Environmental  Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Solid Waste and  Emergency Response; 1991
  The directive  is a guidance  document -  Model Consent
  Decree developed to further support the  CERCLA 104(e) Ini-
  tiative.
  Specifications:  17p.
  Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
  Hazardous  materials, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
  Response, Consent orders.
 0889  Transmittai of the Final Waste Oil Interim
  Enforcement Guidance Document
  Order Number PB91-140202CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 30 Dec 86
  The Office of Solid Waste and Emergency response has de-
  veloped the Waste Oil Interim Enforcement Guidance Docu-
  ment. The purpose of the document is to provide information
  to the Regions about the technology of the waste oil industry
  as well as strategies for enforcement.  Waste  oil is  a very
  complex environmental issue owing in large part to the diffi-
  culty  of tracing  waste derived fuels  through  a  complex
  system of waste oil dealers. The guidance was developed to
  assist those enforcing the waste oil regulations to better un-
   derstand the important issues. It is interim guidance because
  the  regulations for used oil management have not been com-
   pleted. As the regulations become complete or changes in
   policy or technology occur, the document will be amended
   accordingly.
   Specifications:  66p.
  166

-------
                                                                PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Federal Facilities
   Subject index keywords:  Superfund, Waste management
   Hazardous materials, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
   Response.

  0890  United States Environmental Protection Agency
   Model CERCLA RD/RA Consent Decree
   Order Number PB91-201673CDH, price: PC A05/MF A01
   Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
   Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 1991
   .The  directive is  a Guidance Document -  Model Consent
   Decree (CERCLA RD/RA)  to further support Sections 106
   and 107 of CERCLA.
   Specifications:  82p.
   Subject index keywords:  Superfund, Waste management
   Hazardous materials, Office of Solid  Waste  and Emerqencv
   Response.

 0891   Use of CERCLA Section 106 Unilateral Enforcement
   for Remedial Design and Remedial Action: Strategy for
   Fiscal Year 1990
   -Order Number PB91-139733CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
   Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
   Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 14 Feb 90
  • The directive describes FY90 strategy for enhancing  use of
   CERCLA section  106 authorities, focusing  significantly on
   Unilateral Administrative Orders (UAOs) for remedial designs
   and remedial actions (RD/RA). The directive supersedes di-
   rective no.  9870.1 'CERCLA Section  106 Unilateral RD/RA
   Enforcement: Accomplishments  through 2nd Quarter  and
   Strategy for the Remainder of FY 1989,' dated July 11, 1989.
   Specifications: 11 p.
   Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste  management
   Hazardous materials, Office  of Solid Waste and Emerqencv
   Response.

 0892  Waiver of Concurrence on  De Minimis Generator
   Settlements
   Order Number PB91-138826CDH, price: PC A01/MF A01
   Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
   Emergency and Remedial Response; 15 Jul 88
   The directive authorizes Region I at Type Level 2 of the re-
   vised CERCLA civil judicial settlement authorities under Dele-
   gation 14-13-B and 14-14-E,  providing the Region with dele-
   gated authority to transmit de minimis settlements under sec-
   tion 122(g)(1)(A) to the Department of Justice, with  Head-
   quarters consultation. The directive supplements a portion of
   directive No. 9012.10-a 'Revision of CERCLA Judicial Settle-
   ment  Authorities Under  Delegations  14-13-B  and  14-14-E'
   dated June 17, 1988.                              .  '
  Specifications:  5p.
  Subject index keywords: Refuse disposal, Penalties,  Office
  of  Solid Waste and Emergency Response, Comprehensive
  Environment Response Compensation and Liability Act Gen-
  erator settlements.

0893  Waiver of Headquarters Approval for Issuance  of
  RD/RA Special Notice Letters at the Time of ROD
  Signature from OERR and OWPE
  Order Number PB91-139261CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 26 Sep 88
  The report informs  the Regions that it will no longer be nec-
  essary to obtain prior written  approval  from Headquarters to
  issue special notice letters at record of decision signature
   Specifications:  6p.
   Subject index keywords: Hazardous wastes,  Waste treat-
   ment, Law enforcement, Superfund, Record of Decision.

 0894  Written Demand for CERCLA Cost Recovery
   Order Number PB91-204628CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
   Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
   Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 21 Mar 91
   The directive provides updated guidance on the use and is-
   suance of written demands.  Written  demands  are used to
   formalize  the  demand  for payment of incurred costs plus
   future expenditures, to inform potential defendants  of the
   dollar  amount of those costs, and to establish  that interest
   begins to accrue  on  expenditures.  The guidance  helps
   assure that the written demand is made early to maximize re-
   covery. The directive supplements directive 9832.1 'Cost Re-
   covery Actions Under the Comprehensive Environmental Re-
   sponse, Compensation,  and Liability Act of 1980  (CERCLA)',
   dated August 26, 1983.
   Specifications: 33p.
   Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
   Hazardous materials,  Office of Solid Waste and  Emergency
   Response. •

 0895  Written Demand for Recovery of Costs Incurred
   Under the Comprehensive Environmental Response,
   Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA)
   Order Number PB91-228742CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
   Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
   Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 26  Mar 91
   The directive was written to  formalize  the demand  for pay-
   ment of costs; to inform potential determines of the dollar
   amount of these costs; and to establish that interest begins
   to accrue.                           .     ,
   Specifications: 31 p.
  Subject index keywords: Superfund,  Waste management,
   Hazardous materials, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
  Response.


PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION:

Federal  Facilities

0896  Compendium of Federal Facilities Directives,  1984
  and 1983
  Order Number PB91-921280CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Emergency and Remedial Response; Aug 91
  The compendium  is a collection of Federal Facilities direc-
  tives issued in 1984 and 1985. The contents includes: Feder-
  al Facilities (9272.0-04); Implementation of CERCLA Strategy
  at Federal  Facilities (9272.0-01); Initial  Guidance  on  Federal
  Facilities CERCLA Sites (9272.0-02);  Responsibilities for
  Federal Facilities (9272.0-03);  and  Responsibilities for Feder-
  al Facilities (9272.0-05).
  Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
  posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
  and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
  paper copy or microfiche. 13p.
  Subject index  keywords: Federal  government,  Facilities,
  Superfund.                 .
                                                                                                           167

-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Field Health & Safety
0897  Future Land Use Scenarios for Federal Facilities
  Order Number PB92-182427CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Seattle, WA. Region X; Jul
  92
  The paper provides background information for predicting (1)
  the time required to transfer a Federal property to new own-
  ership, and (2) the likely future of a Federal property after
  transfer. Making these predictions is a necessary part of the
  baseline risk assessment which must be performed on each
  Superfund site in compliance with Federal  regulations. Key
  Issues that are unresolved by current guidance are also dis-
  cussed, including the parceling of Superfund  properties, the
  wauranty of  cleanup operations,  liability, the  use of  institu-
  tional controls, and occupant protection. The paper empha-
  sizes that transfer times and future uses are  highly depend-
  ent upon the politics of  the specific site,  the oversight
  agency, and the local community. Some suggestions for site
  specific surveys are presented.
  Specifications: 61 p.
  Subject index keywords:  Land  management, Military facili-
  ties, Land ownership, Risk assessment, Land pollution.

 0898  Guidance for Federal Facilities on Release
  Notification Requirements under CERCLA and SARA
  Title  III
  Order Number PB93-963412CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Nov 90
  The document is intended as guidance for federal facilities to
  better understand CERCLA and  SARA Title II release notifi-
  cation requirements.
  Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
  posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
  and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
  paper copy or microfiche. 29p.
  Subject index keywords: Superfund, Pollution regulations,
  Federal facilities.
 0899   Military Base Closures: Guidance on EPA
  Concurrence in the Identification of  Uncontaminated
  Parcels under CERCLA Section 120(h)(4)
   Order Number PB94-963249CDH, price: Standing Order, call
  for price
   Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
   Emergency and Remedial Response; 19 Apr 94
   The memorandum is intended to provided guidance concern-
   ing the implementation of CERCLA section 120(h)(4). Specifi-
   cally, it addresses the approach  EPA should use in determin-
   ing whether to concur that a parcel has been properly identi-
   fied by the military service  as 'uncontaminated' and therefore
   transferrable pursuant to CERCLA 120(h)(4).
   Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
   posit account required ($100 U.S., Canada,  and Mexico; all
   others $200). Single copies also available in paper  copy or
   microfiche. 4p.
   Subject index keywords: Military base closings, Hazardous
   materials, Land pollution detection.
0900  Regional Oversight of Federal Facility Clean-ups
  under CERCLA
  Order Number PB91-138875CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 25 Nov 85
  The directive  reemphasizes the importance of oversight of
  Federal facilities. The memorandum outlines Regional roles
  and responsibilities for Federal facilities oversight, and refers
  to the draft 'Federal Facilities Program Manual for Implemen-
  tation of CERCLA Responsibilities of Federal Agencies.'
  Specifications: 9p.
  Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
  Hazardous materials, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
  Response.


 PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Field

 Health  & Safety

 0901   Compendium of ERT Air Sampling Procedures
  Order Number PB92-963406CDH, price: PC A07/MF A02
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Emergency and Remedial Response; May 92
  The directive  provides guidelines for ERT air sampling proce-
  dures including SUMMA Canister Cleaning, SUMMA Canister
  Sampling, GC/MS  Analysis of  Tenax/CMS Cartridges  and
  SUMMA Canisters,  Preparation of SUMMA  Canister Field
  Standards, Low Level Methane Analysis for SUMMA Canister
  Gas Samples,  Asbestos Sampling,  Tedlar Bag  Sampling,
  Charcoal Tube Sampling, Tenax Tub  Sampling, and Polyure-
  thane Foam Sampling.
  Specifications: Paper copy available  on  Standing Order,  de-
  posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
  and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
  paper copy or microfiche. 128p.
  Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
  Hazardous materials, Air pollution sampling, SUMMA canis-
  ters, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response.

 0902  Compendium of ERT Field Analytical Procedures
   Order Number PB92-963405CDH, price: PC A05/MF A01
   Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
   Emergency and Remedial Response;  May 92
   The directive provides standard  operating procedures for
   field analytical procedures,  including the use of Sentex Scen-
   tograph  Gas Chromatograph; Portable XRF Analyzer;  Pho-
   toionization Detector - HNU; Photovac 10A10 Portable Gas
   Chromatograph  Operation;  Photovac  10S50,  10S55,  and
   10S70 Gas Chromatograph Operation; Photovac GC Analysis
   for Air,  Soil Gas, Water, and Soil; and Micromonitor M200.
   Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
   posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
   and Mexico;  all others  $400). Single  copies also available in
   paper copy or microfiche. 84p.
   Subject index keywords:  Superfund, Waste management,
   Hazardous materials, Air pollution detection, Gas analysis,
   Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response.
  168

-------
 0903  Compendium of ERT Groundwater Sampling
   Procedures
   Order Number PB91-921275CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
   Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
   Emergency and Remedial Response; Jan 91
   The Compendium  of Groundwater Sampling Procedures de-
   scribes methods used for  preventing or reducing cross-con-
  , lamination,  and provides  general  guidelines for  sampling
   equipment  decontamination  procedures at a hazardous
   waste site.  Preventing or  minimizing cross-contamination  in
   sampled media and  in samples is  important for preventing
   the introduction of  error into sampling results and for protect-
   ing the health and safety of site personnel.
   Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
   posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
   and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available  in
   paper copy or microfiche. 69p.
   Subject index keywords:  Ground water, Hazardous materi-
   als, Waste disposal, Superfund.

 0904  Compendium of ERT Soil Sampling and Surface
   Geophysics Procedures
   Order Number PB91-921273CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
   Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
   Emergency and Remedial Response; Jan 91
   The compendium  of  soil sampling  and surface geophysics
   procedures describes methods used for preventing or reduc-
   ing cross-contamination, and provides general guidelines for
  sampling equipment decontamination procedures at hazard-
  pus waste site. Preventing or minimizing cross-contamination
  in  sampled media and in  samples is important for preventing
  the introduction of eror into sampling results and for protect-
  ing the health and safety of site personnel.
  Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
  posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
  and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
  paper copy or microfiche. 43p.
  Subject index keywords: Sampling, Soils, Hazardous mate-
  rials, Superfund.

0905  Compendium of ERT Surface Water and Sediment
  Sampling Procedures
  Order Number PB91-921274CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Emergency and Remedial Response; Jan 91
  The Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) describes methods
  used for  preventing or reducing cross-contamination,  and
  provides general guidelines for sampling  equipment decon-
  tamination  procedures at a hazardous waste site. Preventing
  or minimizing cross-contamination in sampled media and in
  samples is important for preventing the  introduction of error
  into sampling results and for protecting the health and safety
  of site personnel.
  Specifications: Paper  copy  available on Standing Order, de-
  posit account required  (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
  and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
  paper copy or microfiche. 30p.
  Subject  index keywords:  Hazardous  materials,  Surface
  waters, Sediments, Superfund.
          PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Reid Health &
                                                  Safety


 0906  Compendium of ERT Toxicity Testing Procedures
   Order Number PB91-921271CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
   Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
   Emergency and Remedial Response; Jan 91
   The compendium documents the procedure for conducting a
   standard reference toxicity  test using  sodium pentachloro-
   phenate (NaPCP) as the toxicant and larval Pimephales pro-
   melas (fathead minnows) as the test organism. The test esti-
   mates the fitness, condition, and sensitivity of the organisms
   used in a definitive toxicity test. It allows for inter- and intrala-
   boratory comparisons of toxicity information and provides an
   experimental control.
   Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
   posit account required (minimum deposit $200  U.S., Canada,
   and  Mexico; all others $400). Single copies  also available in
   paper copy or microfiche. 49p.
   Subject index keywords: Tests,  Hazardous materials, Tox-
   icity, Superfund.

 0907   Compendium of ERT Waste Sampling Procedures
   Order Number PB91-921276CDH, price:  PC A04/MF A01
   Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
   Emergency and Remedial Response; Jan 91
   The  compendium of waste  sampling procedures describes
   methods used  for preventing or reducing cross-contamina-
   tion,  and provides general guidelines for sampling  equipment
   decontamination procedures  at a hazardous waste site. Pre-
   venting or  minimizing cross-contamination  in sampled media
   and in samples is important for preventing the introduction of
   error into sampling results and for protecting the health and
   safety of site personnel.
   Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing  Order, de-
   posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
   and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
   paper copy or microfiche. 58p.
   Subject index  keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste dis-
   posal, Superfund.

0908  Establishing Work Zones at Uncontrolled Hazardous
   Waste Sites
   Order Number PB91-921342CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
   Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
   Emergency and Remedial Response; Apr 91
   The purpose of the Fact Sheet is to summarize the proce-
   dures and  requirements  for  establishing  and  maintaining
   work  zones, including Support Zones at  hazardous waste
   sites.
   Specifications: Paper copy available  on  Standing Order, de-
   posit account required (minimum deposit $150 U.S., Canada,
  and Mexico; all  others  $300). Single copies also available in
  paper copy  or microfiche. 12p.
  Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
  Hazardous materials, Occupational  safety and health, Office
  of Solid Waste and Emergency Response.

0909  Field Certification Tracking System (FCTS).  User's
  Guide. Version  2.1
  Order Number PB93-963415CDH, price: PC  A04/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC.  Office of
  Emergency and Remedial Response; Jul 93
  The document provides step by step guidelines  for installing
  the  Field Certification Tracking System (FCTS),  Version 2.1.
                                                                                                             169

-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Field Health & Safety
  Hardware needs are described as well as where to call for
  help.
  Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
  posit account required (minimum deposit $225 U.S., Canada,
  and Mexico; all others $450). Single copies also available in
  paper copy or microfiche. 55p.
  Subject Index keywords: Installation manuals, Superfund,
  FCTS(Field Certification Tracking System).
0910  Field Standard Operating Procedures for Air
  Surve|llance F.S.O.P. No. 8
  Order Number PB91-213843CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Emergency and Remedial Response; 1 Jan 85
  The directive describes air monitoring procedures for use by
  field  personnel in obtaining  air monitoring data required to
  minimize the risk of exposure to personnel at hazardous sub-
  stance release sites.
  Specifications:  27p.
  Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste  management,
  Hazardous materials, Occupational safety and health, Air pol-
  lution monitoring,  Risk  assessment,  Office  of  Solid Waste
  and Emergency Response.
0911  Reid Standard Operating Procedures for
  Establishing Work Zones (F.S.O.P. 6)
  Order Number PB91-213827CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 1 Apr 85
  The directive describes procedures to be used by field  per-
  sonnel In establishing work zones for control of hazardous
  materials to minimize the risk of exposure to workers at haz-
  ardous release sites.
  Specifications:  23p.
  Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
  Hazardous  materials,  Risk assessment, Occupational  safety
  and health, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response.
0912  Field Standard Operating Procedures for
  Preparation of a Site Safety Plan F.S.O.P.  No. 9
  Order Number PB91:213835CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 1 Apr 85
  The  directive establishes requirements for protecting  health
  and safety of field personnel during all activities conducted at
  the site of  an incident. The manual contains safety informa-
  tion, instructions, and procedures to cover a variety of situa-
  tions commonly encountered in this type of field work.
  Specifications: 30p.
  Subject index keywords: Occupational safety and health,
  Superfund, Waste management, Hazardous materials,  Risk
  assessment, Office of  Solid Waste and  Emergency Re-
  sponse.
0913  Field Standard Operating Procedures for the
  Decontamination of Response Personnel  F.S.O.P. No. 7
  Order Number PB91-213850CDH,  price: PC A03/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Emergency and Remedial Response; 1 Jan 85
  The directive describes approved operating procedures for
  decontamination  of response personnel  and equipment  at
  hazardous  substance release sites.
  Specifications: 33p.
  Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
  Hazardous materials,  Decontamination,  Occupational safety
  and health, Equipment, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
  Response.

0914  Hazardous Waste Operations and Emergency
  Response: RCRA TSD and Emergency Response Without
  Regard to Location
  Order Number PB91-921340CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Emergency and Remedial Response; Apr 91
  The purpose of the Fact Sheet is to explain  the principle re-
  quirements of the EPA and OSHA worker protection stand-
  ards as they apply to employees who perform emergency re-
  sponse operations  irrespective  of  location  and employees
  who perform hazardous waste operations  at RCRA TSD fa-
  cilities.
  Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
  posit account required (minimum deposit $150 U.S., Canada,
  and Mexico;  all others $300).  Single copies also available in
  paper copy or microfiche. 12p.
  Subject index keywords:  Superfund, Waste management,
  Hazardous materials,  Occupational  safety  and health, Office
  of Solid Waste and  Emergency Response.

0915  Hazmat Team Planning Guidance
  Order Number PB90-274523CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 90
  The manual will  assist local fire departments in identifying,
  acquiring, and maintaining the hazardous materials response
  equipment and trained personnel appropriate for their locale.
  The manual  offers guidance in the following areas: Determin-
  ing  actual hazmat  response  requirements;  Establishing the
  goals and levels of expertise  needed to meet those require-
  ments; Estimating  the costs and  developing  a budget to
  meet your goals; and  Preparing  response plans and standard
  operating procedures (SOPs) to include the entire local re-
  sponse community.
  Specifications: 60p.
  Subject index keywords:  Hazardous materials, Directories,
  Fire departments.

0916   Health  and Safety Audit Guidelines: SARA Title I,
  Section 126
  Order Number PB90-204157CDH, price: PC A06/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Emergency and Remedial Response; Dec  89
  The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Audit Guidelines
  provide step-by-step guidance for assessing preliminary eval-
  uations, health and safety plans (HASPs), and off-site emer-
  gency response programs required under the  Occupational
  Safety and  Health Administration (OSHA) and EPA worker
  protection standards.  Employees affected by the EPA stand-
  ards will  primarily be  those State and local  government em-
  ployees engaged in hazardous waste operations at  hazard-
  ous waste sites  and  State and local off-site emergency re-
  sponse personnel. The Guidelines address two major  com-
  ponents  of  the OSHA/EPA  worker protection standards:
  health and safety provisions at uncontrolled  hazardous waste
  sites and off-site emergency response.
  Specifications:  109p.
 170

-------
                                                                   PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Field Health &
                                                                                                            Safety
   Subject index keywords: Auditing,  Safety, Environmental
   surveys, Occupational safety and  health, Toxic substances,
   Emergency preparedness.

 0917  Health and Safety Plan (HASP) User's Guide
   (Version 3.0/4.0)
   Order Number PB93-963414CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
   Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
   Emergency and Remedial Response; Jul 93
   HASP (Health and Safety Planner) Version 3.0/4.0  is a soft-
   ware program that generates a site-specific safety plan using
   an automated decision-making process. HASP recommends
   the required levels of protection (such as respirators and per-
   sonal protective equipment) based on the tasks being  per-
   formed and the chemicals that will  be encountered. HASP in-
   cludes standard protocols for 'typical' waste remediation and
   assessment activities, and the health and safety plan format
   is consistent with OSHA's 29 CFR 1910.120  and U.S. EPA's
   40 CFR 311 requirements. The HASP is  a mobile, field-
   usable instrument, containing a  database of information on
   110 commonly occurring chemicals. The chemical database
   used in developing the HASP also contains information on
   an additional 2,500 chemicals.
   Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
   posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
   and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
   paper copy or microfiche. 29p.
   Subject index  keywords: Superfund, Occupational  safety
   and health, Remediation.

0918  Health and Safety Roles and Responsibilities at
   Remedial Sites
   Order Number PB91-921362CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
   Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
   Emergency and Remedial Response; Apr 91
  The purpose of the fact sheet is to define the major compo-
   nents of the health and safety program and  to delineate the
   health and safety roles and  responsibilities for Remedial
   Project Managers (RPMs),  lead  parties/agencies, and con-
  tractors  during  the remedial  action  phase  of Superfund
  cleanups. It addresses the various  roles of all parties in the
  overall health and safety program  for  a site, with emphasis
  on  Occupational  Safety and  Health  Act/Agency  (OSHA)
  compliance.
  Specifications:  Paper copy available on Standing Order,  de-
  posit account required (minimum  deposit $150 U.S., Canada,
  and Mexico; all others $300). Single copies also available in
  paper copy or microfiche. 6p.
  Subject index keywords: Safety,  Public health, Hazardous
  materials, Superfund.

0919  Importance of Quality for Collection of
  Environmental Samples. Planning, Implementing, and
  Assessing Field Sampling Quality at CERCLA Sites
  Order Number PB91-218941CDH, price: PC A03/MF  A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Quality
  Assurance Management  Staff; 26 Jun 91
  The most neglected aspects of environmental data collection
  operations have been in the areas of  sampling design and
  sample collection.  For years, most major environmental data
  QA/QC efforts have focused on the laboratory operations,
  with either the tacit assumption that sampling activities had
  been properly designed  and implemented, or with very little
  attention given at all to the quality of field or sampling oper-
   ations. Infrequent data quality analyses did result in the rec-
   ognition that major error sources were undoubtedly associat-
   ed with the sampling components of environmental data col-
   lection. However,  little was generally done to address or
   remedy these recognized data quality shortfalls. The paper
   will illustrate the importance of adequate planning, implemen-
   tation, and assessment of field sampling work in the context
   of  the  Environmental  Protection Agency's Superfund  pro-
   gram.
   Specifications: 12p.
   Subject  index keywords:  Superfund,  Sampling, Site  sur-
   veys, Waste disposal, Management planning.

 0920  OSWER Integrated Health and Safety Policy
   Order Number PB90-258344CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
   Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
   Emergency and Remedial Response; 16 Aug 88
   The policy articulates the requirement for all EPA employees
   to comply with Occupational Health and Safety Administra-
   tion (OSHA) as well as EPA Health and  Safety Directives.
   The 27-page manual  outlines the conditions of this policy
   and the roles and  responsibilities of  EPA employees in meet-
   ing them.  The  policy applies to all Office of Solid Waste and
   Emergency Response (OSWER) employees engaged in haz-
   ardous substances response activities.
   Specifications: 35p.
   Subject index keywords: Regulations, Project management,
   Occupational safety and health, Superfund, Office of Solid
   Waste and Emergency Response, Environmental Protection
   Agency.

 0921   OSWER Integrated Health and Safety Standard
   Operating Practices
   Order Number PB93-963401 CDH, price: PC A01/MF A01
   Environmental  Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
   Solid Waste and Emergency  Response; Feb 93
   The directive implements the OSWER (Office of Solid Waste
   and  Emergency Response)  Integrated  Health and Safety
   Standards Operating Practices in conjunction with the OSHA
   (Occupational  Safety  and  Health  Act)  Worker  Protection
   Standards, replacing the OSWER  Integrated  Health and
   Safety Policy.
   Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
   posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
  and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
  paper copy or microfiche. 2p.
  Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
  Hazardous materials, Occupational safety and health, Office
  of Solid Waste  and Emergency Response.
0922  Personal Air Sampling  and Air Monitoring
  Requirements under 29 CFR 1910.120
  Order Number PB93-963420CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Aug 93
  The Hazardous Waste Operations and Emergency Response
  (HAZWOPER)  provides a general overview of the worker
  protection  standards as they apply to operations conducted
  at uncontrolled hazardous waste sites. The purpose of the
  Fact Sheet is to summarize  the HAZWOPER air monitoring
  and sampling aspects of these requirements. The Fact Sheet
  is composed of five parts: (1) Introduction  to Air Monitoring
  and Air Sampling; (2) Air Monitoring  Requirements Upon Ini-
                                                                                                              171

-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Oil Spill & Spill
Management
  tial Entry; (3) Air Monitoring Requirements After Initial Entry;
  (4) Conducting Air Monitoring and Sampling; and (5) Informa-
  tion Sources and Contacts.
  Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
  posit account required (minimum deposit $225 U.S., Canada,
  and Mexico; all others $450). Single copies also available in
  paper copy or microfiche. 16p.
  Subject Index keywords: Air pollution monitors, Hazardous
  materials, Occupational exposure.

0923  Priority for Health and Safety Requirements,
  Especially Medical Surveillance Requirements, for EPA
  Employees Who Support OSWER Programs
  Order Number PB91-921346CDH, price: PC A01/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Emergency and Remedial Response; 1 Mar 90
  The directive reminds employees that EPA must comply with
  OSHA's hazardous waste and emergency response worker
  protection rule (29 CFR 1910.120), EPA health and safety
  policies contained  in EPA 1440 Directives, and OSWER Di-
  rective  9285.8-02,  'U.S. Environmental  Protection  Agency
  Health  and Safety Audit Manual.' The directive gives some
  specific details  regarding medical surveillance, sometimes
  called medical monitoring requirements.
  Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
  posit account required (minimum  deposit $150 U.S., Canada,
  and Mexico; all others $300). Single copies also available in
  paper copy or microfiche. 4p.
  Subject Index keywords: Superfund, Waste  management,
  Hazardous materials, Occupational safety and  health, Office
  of Solid Waste and Emergency Response.

0924   Standard Operating Safety Guides
  Order Number PB90:249590CDH, price: PC A07/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington,  DC. Office of
  Emergency and Remedial' Response; Jul 88
  The report includes the Occupational Safety and Health Ad-
  ministration (OSHA) regulations as they might apply to haz-
  ardous waste workers involved in incident response. The edi-
  tion updates the November 1984 edition of Standard Operat-
  ing Safety Guides.
  Specifications: 137p.
  Subject index  keywords:  Workers, Hazardous materials,
  Safety, Superfund,  Occupational  Safety and Health Adminis-
  tration.

0925  Standard Operating Safety Guides
  Order Number PB92-963414CDH, price: PC A09/MF A03
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Emergency and Remedial Response; Jun 92
  The guides provide information on health and safety and are
  to complement professional judgment and experience, and to
  supplement existing Regional Office safety procedures. The
  document provides guidance for ensuring health and safety
  of site  personnel  who  work  with hazardous substances or
  who work at uncontrolled hazardous waste sites. The guid-
  ance is intended for federal,  state, and local managers and
  personnel at sites where hazardous materials are  present.
  The SOSG is intended to provide a comprehensive overview
  of the information needed by employers to meet their re-
  sponsibility to assure the health and safety of employees en-
  gaged  in operations at hazardous waste sites.
  Specifications: Available on  Standing  Order, deposit  ac-
  count  required  (minimum deposit $200  U.S., Canada, and
  Mexico;  all  others $400). Single copies also available in
  paper copy or microfiche. 194p.
  Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Safety, Pol-
  lution control, Public health, Superfund.


PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Oil

Spill & Spill Management

0926  CERCLA Notifications: Emergency Response
  Notification System (ERNS) Fact Sheet
  Order  Number PB92-963411CDH, price: PC A01/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Emergency and Remedial Response; Apr 92
  The Emergency Response Notification System (ERNS) pro-
  vides  a mechanism  for documenting and verifying release
  notification information as initially  reported to the National
  Response Center (NRG), the  U.S. Environmental Protection
  Agency  (EPA),  and,  to  a limited extent, to the U.S.  Coast
  Guard (USCG) for response decisions. The initial  notification
  data may be followed up by various Federal,  State and local
  response authorities, as appropriate. ERNS  contains data
  that can be used to  analyze release notifications and spills,
  support emergency  planning efforts,  and assist decision
  makers  in developing spill prevention  programs. The  fact
  sheet  provides summary information on notifications  of re-
  leases of hazardous substances regulated under the Com-
  prehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Li-
  ability Act of 1980 (CERCLA), as amended.
  Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
  posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
  and Mexico; all others $400).  Single copies also available  in
  paper copy or microfiche. 2p.
  Subject index keywords:  Superfund,  Waste management,
  Hazardous materials, Office of Solid Wastes and  Emergency
  Response, Emergency Response Notification System.

0927 Emergency Response Notification System
  Order Number PB90-249715CDH, price:  PC A02
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Emergency and Remedial Response; Aug 89
  The pamphlet provides general information for the public de-
  scribing the Emergency Response Notification System, the
  national computer database and retrieval system that is used
  to store information  on releases of oil  and  hazardous  sub-
  stances.
  Specifications: 7p.
  Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Environmen-
  tal surveys, Superfund, Emergency Response  Notification
  System, ERNS system, Oil spills, Waste management, Data
  bases.
 172

-------
                                                                   PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Oil Spill & Spill
                                                                                                      Management
 0928  Exxon Valdez Oil Spill. A Report to the President
   Order Number PB91-213819CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
   Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
   Emergency and Remedial Response.; Department of
   Transportation, Washington, DC. Office of the
   Secretary.**National Response Team, Washington, DC; May
   89
   Prepared by the National Response Team, the report was re-
   quested by the President and undertaken by Secretary  of
   Transportation Samuel K. Skinner and Environmental Protec-
   tion  Agency Administrator William K.  Reilly. The report ad-
   dresses the preparedness for, the response to, and early les-
   sons learned from the Exxon Valdez incident. The President
   has also asked Secretary Skinner to coordinate the efforts of
   all federal agencies involved in the cleanup and  Administra-
   tor Reilly to coordinate the long-term recovery of the affected
   areas of the Alaskan environment. The efforts are ongoing.
   Specifications: Prepared in cooperation  with Department of
   Transportation, Washington, DC. Office of the Secretary, and
   National Response Team, Washington,  DC. 75p.
   Subject index keywords: Oil spills, Water pollution effects,
   Prince William Sound, Oil pollution, Exxon Valdez, Cleanup
   operations.

0929  Facility Response Plans
  Order Number PB93-963408CDH, price: PC A01/MF A01
   Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Feb 93
  The fact sheet provides general information on EPA's intend-
  ed implementation of the Clean Water Act Section 311 re-
  quirements regarding facility response plans.
  Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
  posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
  and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available  in
  paper copy or microfiche. 4p.
  Subject index keywords: Oil  spills, Regulations, Facilities
  management, Oil Pollution Act, Facility Response Plan.

0930   Oil Notifications: Emergency Response Notification
  System (ERNS) Fact Sheet
  Order Number PB92-963413CDH, price: PC A01/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Emergency and Remedial Response; Apr 92
  The  Emergency Response Notification  System  (ERNS)  is  a
  national computer  database which provides the only central-
  ized mechanism for documenting and verifying incident notifi-
  cation information  as initially reported  to  the National  Re-
  sponse Center (NRC),  the U.S. Environmental  Protection
  Agency (EPA), and to a limited extent, the U.S.  Coast Guard
  (USCG). The initial notification data may be followed up with
  updated information from various Federal,  State  and local re-
  sponse authorities,  as appropriate. ERNS  contains data  that
  can be used to analyze release notifications, support emer-
  gency planning efforts, and assist decision makers in devel-
  oping spill  prevention programs. The  fact sheet provides
  summary information  on  notifications of releases of oil re-
  ported  in  accordance with the Clean Water  Act (CWA).
  Under Section 311  of the  CWA, discharges of oil which: (1)
  cause a sheen to appear on the surface of the water; (2)  vio-
  late applicable water quality standards;  or (3) cause sludge
  or  emulsion  to be deposited  beneath the surface  of  the
  water or adjoining  shoreline, must be reported  to the NRC.
   Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
   posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
   and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
   paper copy or microfiche. 2p.
   Subject index keywords: Superfund, Oil spills, Water pollu-
   tion, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response, Emer-
   gency Response Notification System.

 0931  Oil Spill Contingency Planning: National Status. A
   Report to the President
   Order Number PB91-921282CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
   Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
   Emergency and Remedial Response; Oct 90
   In response to the Exxon Valdez oil disaster, President Bush
   directed the National Response Team (NRT) to take  a fresh
   look at  America's readiness to respond to oil spills of nation-
   al significance in the countries' major ports and inland water-
   ways. The report was done in  a compressed timeframe to
   provide  a representative picture of oil spill planning and pre-
   paredness across the country. To accomplish this task, the
   United States Coast Guard and the United States Environ-
   mental  Protection Agency provided a leadership role  for the
   NRT  which  directed federal,  regional, and local  offices to
   evaluate the effectiveness of their oil spill contingency plans.
   The report represents the combined efforts of hundreds of
   individuals, including Coast Guard and EPA On-Scene Coor-
   dinators.
   Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing  Order, de-
   posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
   and Mexico; all others $400).  Single copies also available in
   paper copy or microfiche. 69p.
   Subject index keywords: Oil  pollution, Pollution control, Su-
   perfund.

0932 Oil Spill Prevention, Control, and Countermeasures
   Program. Task Force Report
   Order Number PB91-213868CDH, price: PC A06/MF A01
   Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
   Emergency and Remedial Response;  13 May 88
  The study was initiated in response to the January 2, 1988,
  release  of approximately one million gallons of diesel fuel
  from the Ashland Oil Facility in Floreffe, PA, and the  subse-
  quent contamination of the  Monongahela  and  the Ohio
  Rivers. The spill was caused by the tank flowed over the sur-
  rounding dike and found its way into the Monongahela and
  Ohio Rivers. As  a result of the spill, fifteen  water intakes
  were shut down, water supplies to  over 2.7 million residents
  were disrupted, schools and  businesses were closed,  and
  thousands of fish and waterfowl were destroyed.
  Specifications:  104p.
  Subject index keywords: Oil  spills, Water pollution control,
  Water pollution abatement, Contingency planning.
0933  OPA Q's and A's: Overview of the Oil Pollution Act
  of 1990
  Order Number PB92-963348CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Emergency and Remedial Response; Dec 91
  The OPA Q's and A's are part of a series of fact sheets that
  provide  up-to-date information on EPA's  implementation of
  the OPA. The first fact sheet provides an overview  of the
  various provisions of the OPA  and the Agency's responsibil-
  ities under the new law.
                                                                                                               173

-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Public Information &
Outreach
  Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
  posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
  and Mexico;  all others $400). Single copies also available in
  paper copy or microfiche. 7p.
  Subject index keywords: Pollution laws, Oil pollution, Water
  pollution abatment, Superfund.

0934  OPA Update: Implementation of the Oil Pollution Act
  of 1990. Volume 2, Number 1
  Order Number PB92-96342QCDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Emergency and Remedial Response; Aug 92
  The issue includes information on facility response plans, the
  Environmental  Response Team,  mechanical containment
  and recovery of oil, and the recent designation  of Areas
  under the OPA.
  Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
  posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
  and Mexico;  all others $400). Single copies also available in
  paper copy or microfiche. 8p.
  Subject index keywords: Oil pollution, Monongahela River.

0935  Overview of ERNS: Emergency Response
  Notification  System (ERNS) Fact Sheet
  Order Number PB92-963412CDH, price: PC A01/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Emergency and Remedial Response; Apr 92
  The fact sheet provides an overview  of the Emergency Re-
  sponse Notification System (ERNS), a national computer da-
  tabase used  to store information on releases of oil and haz-
  ardous substances.
  Specifications:  Paper copy available  on Standing Order, de-
  posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
  and Mexico;  all others $400). Single copies also available in
  paper copy or microfiche. 4p.
  Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste  management,
  Hazardous materials, Oil spills,  Water pollution,  Office  of
  Solid  Waste and  Emergency  Response, Emergency Re-
  sponse Notification System.

0936  Update on Implementation of the Oil Pollution Act
  of 1990. Volume 1, Number  1, February 1991
  Order Number PB91-921370CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC.  Office of
  Emergency and  Remedial Response; Feb 91
  The report is one of a series of bulletins intended to provide
  up-to-date information on EPA's implementation of the vari-
  ous provisions of the Oil Pollution Act of 1990 (OPA).  Each
  'Update' highlights activities  of EPA  headquarters and field
  staff as they develop and enforce the regulations and poli-
  cies of the high-priority oil pollution program. The 'Update' in-
  cludes notes from  the  Regional Workgroup meeting  in Gal-
  veston,  questions and answers concerning  OPA, a timeline
  of major EPA activities/deadlines associated with  the  OPA,
  and a list of  EPA Implementation Workgroups.
  Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
  posit account required (minimum deposit $150 U.S., Canada,
  and Mexico; all  others $300). Single copies  also available in
  paper copy or microfiche. 6p.
  Subject index keywords: Oil pollution, Pollution control, Su-
  perfund.
0937  Update on Implementation of the Oil Pollution Act
  of 1990. Volume  1, Number 2, April 1991
  Order Number PB91-921371CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Emergency and Remedial Response; Apr 91
  This is one of a series of bulletins intended to provide up-to-
  date information on EPA's implementation of the various pro-
  visions of the Oil  Pollution Act of 1990 (OPA). Each 'Update'
  highlights activities of EPA headquarters  and  field staff as
  they develop and enforce the regulations and policies of the
  high-priority oil pollution  program. The 'Update' includes a
  spill exercise in Baltimore, MD, practical issues on spill plan-
  ning/response, the  San Diego  Oil Spill  Conference, the
  Exxon Valdez (Lessons Learned and What If), oil spills re-
  ported in the U.S. (1988-1990), and interim guidelines for
  bioremediation.
  Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
  posit account  required (minimum deposit $150 U.S., Canada,
  and Mexico; all others $300). Single copies also available in
  paper copy or microfiche. 6p.
  Subject index keywords: Oil pollution, Pollution control, Su-
  perfund.
0938  Update on Implementation of the Oil Pollution Act
  of 1990. Volume 1, Number 3, June 1991
  Order Number PB91-921372CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Emergency and Remedial Response; Jun 91
  The report is one of a series of bulletins  intended to provide
  up-to-date information on EPA's implmenetation of the vari-
  ous provisions of the Oil Pollution Act of  1990 (OPA). Each
  'Update' highlights activities of EPA headquarters and field
  staff as  they develop and enforce  the regulations and poli-
  cies of the high-priority oil pollution program. The 'Update' in-
  cludes  an overview of EPA's Oil Spill  Prevention and Re-
  sponse Program, the Bioremediation Spill Response Plan, a
  roundtable on the National  Contingency Plan (NCP), and oil
  spill statistics.
  Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
  posit account required (minimum deposit  $150  U.S., Canada,
  and Mexico; all others  $300). Single copies also available in
  paper copy or microfiche. 6p.
  Subject index keywords: Oil pollution, Pollution control, Su-
  perfund.


PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Public

Information & Outreach

0939  Integrating  Removal and Remedial Site Assessment
  Investigations
  Order Number PB93-963341CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Solid Waste and  Emergency Response; Sep 93
  Increased efficiency and shorter response times are the pri-
  mary objectives of integrating  removal and remedial site as-
  sessment investigations under the Superfund Accelerated
  Cleanup  Model (SACM). This is based  on the assumption
  that there is duplication of effort between the programs. The
  fact sheet examines areas of duplication and key differences
  between the two types of investigations, and describes some
  approaches for integrating assessments. The  primary audi-
 174

-------
                                                             PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Public Information &
                                                                                                         Outreach
   ence for this information is the site assessment community
   which includes EPA On-Scene Coordinators (OSCs) and Site
   Assessment Managers (SAMs), their counterparts in state or
   other federal agencies, and assessment contractors.
   Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
   posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
   and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
   paper copy or microfiche. 8p.
   Subject index  keywords: Superfund, Site characterization,
   Risk assessment.

 0940  Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Cleanup
   Efforts Nationwide (Bog Creek Farm)
   Order Number PB92-963612CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
   Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
   Waste Programs Enforcement; 1992
   The Superfund at Work bulletin series  profiles hazardous
   waste cleanup efforts nationwide. This issue profiles the Bog
   Creek Farm site,  a chicken farm in Howell Township, New
   Jersey,  where chemical  solvents and  other wastes  were
   dumped between 1973 and 1974.
   Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order,  de-
   posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
   and Mexico; all  others $400). Single copies also available in
   paper copy or microfiche. 8p.
   Subject index keywords: Superfund,  Waste management,
   Hazardous  materials, Office of  Solid Waste and Emergency
   Response.

 0941  Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Cleanup
   Efforts Nationwide (City Industries)
   Order Number PB92-963619CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
   Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
   Waste Programs Enforcement; 1992
   The Fact Sheet profiles the EPA's successful cleanup of City
   Industries, a former waste handling facility. Because of quick
   and effective cooperation  between the U.S.  Environmental
   Protection Agency (EPA) and the Florida Department of Envi-
   ronmental Regulation (FDER) eliminated  the  threats posed
   by the City  Industries hazardous waste site in the community
   of Goldenrod, Florida. The decisive actions  taken by EPA
   and FDER  at City Industries illustrate  Superfund's commit-
   ment to protecting  citizens and the environment, as  well as
  the Agency's diligence  in making polluters pay  for cleaning
  up the environmental damage they have caused.
  Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
  posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
  and Mexico; all others  $400). Single copies also available in
  paper copy  or microfiche. 7p.
  Subject index keywords: Superfund, Hazardous materials,
  Waste management, Office  of Solid  Waste and Emergency
  Response.

0942  Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Cleanup
  Efforts Nationwide, Fail 1992. (American Thermostat
  Corporation, New York)
  Order Number PB92-963627CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 1992
  EPA's Superfund program  decisively mitigated dangerously
  high levels of toxic  chemicals at New York's American Ther-
  mostat Corporation (ATC) hazardous waste site. Superfund
  staff: quickly sampled area drinking wells and treated over 10
  million gallons of contaminated ground water; used innova-
  tive  technologies to  reduce on-site soil and ground water
  contamination; secured a permanent alternate water supply
  for affected residents; and  initiated a public outreach effort
  which  gained support for cleanup  activities.  The American
  Thermostat site is a prime example of EPA's commitment to
  preserve the health and welfare of  citizens and the environ-
  ment.
  Specifications: Paper copy  available on Standing Order, de-
  posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
  and  Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
  paper copy or microfiche. 6p.
  Subject  index  keywords:  Hazardous materials,  Remedial
  action, Waste  management,  Superfund,  South Cairo(New
  York), Cleanup operations.

0943  Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Cleanup
  Efforts Nationwide, Fall 1992. (Celanese Corporation Site
  Profile)
  Order Number PB92-963617CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 1992
  The  fact  sheet discusses the Superfund site Celanese Cor-
  poration  in Shelby, NC.  The U.S.  Environmental Protection
  Agency's (EPA) Superfund program  has reached some major
  milestones at a hazardous waste site in Shelby, North Caroli-
  na. The site's success is underscored by the fact that the
  polluter, Hoechst-Celanese Corporation, took the initiative to
  perform the  cleanup of the  hazardous waste found on their
  property.
  Specifications:  Paper copy  available on Standing Order, de-
  posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
  and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
  paper copy or microfiche. 8p.
  Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
  Hazardous materials.

0944  Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Cleanup
  Efforts Nationwide, Fall 1992. (Ciba-Geigy Corporation,
  Mclntosh, Alabama)
  Order Number PB92-963630CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Solid Waste and Emergency  Response; 1992
  On March  31,  1992, the  U.S.  Environmental  Protection
  Agency (EPA) reached an agreement with Ciba-Geigy Corpo-
  ration in  Mclntosh, Alabama to clean  up soil and ground
  water contaminated by DDT, herbicides, and chemicals. The
  agreement is one of the largest  private party settlements in
  Sdperfund history, valued at  approximately $120 million. EPA
  activities at the site included: conducting preliminary contami-
  nation investigations jointly with the Alabama Environmental
  Health  Administration, beginning  in 1979; designing a multi-
  phased cleanup that is responsive to the complex  nature of
  the contamination and  reduces  potential risk  to the local
  population and environment;  and awarding a grant to a com-
  munity  group to help  them participate  in cleanup decisions.
  Ciba-Geigy, like  EPA,  has made consistent efforts to build
  and maintain good  relations  with the community. These ef-
  forts  demonstrate  the increasing trend toward cooperation
  between industries, local communities,  and EPA at Super-
  fund sites.
  Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order,  de-
  posit  account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
                                                                                                               175

-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Public Information &
Outreach
  and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
  paper copy or microfiche. 6p.
  Subject  index  keywords:  Superfund,  Remedial  action,
  Waste      management,       Hazardous      materials,
  MclntoshfAlabama), Cleanup operations.
0945  Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Cleanup
  Efforts Nationwide, Fall 1992. (Krysowaty Farm,
  Hillsborough, New Jersey)
  Order Number PB92-963629CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 1992
  The one-acre dump at Krysowaty Farm  was small in  size
  compared to some other Superfund sites. But five  years of
  dumping proved to be a challenge when designing an appro-
  priate cleanup. Nevertheless,  the U.S.  Environmental Protec-
  tion Agency (EPA) quickly  and  efficiently alleviated immedi-
  ate and potential dangers to the community of Hillsborough,
  New  Jersey. In less  than five  months, Superfund  staff:
  worked closely  with community members and Hillsborough
  Township  officials to ensure an effective solution;  funded a
  permanent alternate water supply for residents threatened by
  contaminated well water; and completed a permanent clean-
  up of hazardous wastes at the site.  Krysowaty Farm  is a
  good  example of how an  active community, coupled  with
  EPA responsiveness and expertise, can  eliminate the dan-
  gers posed by the unauthorized dumping of hazardous sub-
  stances.
  Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
  posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
  and Mexico; all  others $400). Single copies also available in
  paper copy or microfiche. 6p.
  Subject index keywords:  Superfund, Hazardous materials,
  Remedial   action,   Waste    management,   Hillsborough
  Township(New Jersey), Cleanup operations.
0946  Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Cleanup
  Efforts Nationwide, Fall 1992.  (Lansdowne Radioactive
  Residence Site Profile)
  Order Number PB92-963625CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC.  Office of
  Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 1992
  The fact sheet gave a general overview of the Superfund
  clean-up of a Lansdowne, PA house, the only residential site
  placed on the EPA's National Priorities List and the first non-
  federal radiation site cleaned  up under Superfund. The base-
  ment  of the house had been Dr. Dicran  Kabakjian's unregu-
  lated  radium processing laboratory from 1924 to 1944. The
  house and the  soil  surrounding it had to  be completely
  cleared away because both were seriously contaminated with
  radon gas and gamma radiation. As a result, the EPA estab-
  lished the precedent for setting radiation levels in residential
  areas, applying  moire stringent  levels  than those set by the
  Uranium Mill Tailings Radiation Control Act of 1978.
  Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
  posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
  and Mexico; all  others $400). Single copies also available in
  paper copy or microfiche. 10p.
  Subject index keywords:  Pennsylvania,  Radioactive wastes,
  Waste disposal, Superfund, Lansdowne(Pennsylvania).
0947  Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Cleanup
  Efforts Nationwide, Fall 1992. (Valley of the Drums,
  Bullitt County, Kentucky)
  Order Number PB92-963618CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Solid Waste and Emergency Response;  1992
  The Superfund program was  designed  to mitigate the dan-
  gers posed by improper disposal of hazardous  waste. The
  A.L. Taylor site, also known  as 'Valley of the Drums', was
  one of the first challenges to Superfund. Valley of the Drums
  was the scene of one of  the largest drum removals  in the
  history of the program. The successful  cleanup was accom-
  plished through some notable achievements, including: a sig-
  nificant reduction of risks  to  local citizens and the environ-
  ment due to several emergency removal actions;  use  of
  state-of-the-art cleanup  technologies; combined efforts be-
  tween the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and
  the Kentucky Department of Natural  Resources and Environ-
  mental  Protection (KDNREP);  and recovery of $1.8 million of
  EPA's cleanup costs from polluters. The cooperative effort
  among  EPA, State and local groups  culminated in a cleanup
  of tremendous proportions and a  safe community and envi-
  ronment.
  Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
  posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
  and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
  paper copy or microfiche. 8p.
  Subject index keywords: Superfund, Hazardous materials,
  Remedial  action,  Drums(Containers),  Waste  management,
  Bullitt County(Kentucky), Cleanup operations.

0948 Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Cleanup
  Efforts Nationwide, Fall 1992. (Wide Beach Section of
  Brant, New York)
  Order Number PB92-963628CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Solid Waste and Emergency Response;  1992
  Wide-spread  contamination  of   polychlorinated biphenyls
  (PCBs) threatened  the  Wide Beach section of  Brant, New
  York, a popular vacation  resort. EPA's Superfund program
  effectively completed a permanent cleanup of Wide Beach in
  the span of  one year. Other  highlights  included: a new and
  innovative technology to remove PCB contamination;  reduc-
  tion of PCBs to one-fifth of acceptable levels; temporary relo-
  cation of residents who were concerned for their health while
  cleanup activities took place; newly paved roads and drive-
  ways, re-landscaped yards, and a new  storm sewer system;
  and  restoration of  ecologically  sensitive wetlands.  EPA's
  achievements significantly reduced PCB risks at Wide Beach,
  and left a satisfied community in Brant.
  Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
  posit account required (minimum  deposit $200  U.S., Canada,
  and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
  paper copy or microfiche. 8p.
  Subject index keywords:  Superfund, Remedial  action, Haz-
  ardous materials, Waste management,  Oil spills, Brant(New
  York), Cleanup operations.
 176

-------
                                                              PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Public Information &
                                                                                                           Outreach
  0949  Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Cleanup
    Efforts Nationwide, Fall 1993 (Big D Campground Site
    Profile, Ashtabula County, Kingsville, Ohio)
    Order Number PB94-963608CDH, price: Standing Order, call
    for price
    f n^r°n,mental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
    bond Waste and Emergency Response; 1993
    A quarter mile from the old Big  D Campground, a sand and
    gravel quarry in Ashtabula County, Ohio served as a landfill
    for solvents, caustic chemicals  and oily substances. High-
    lights of the overall effort included:  Destruction  of  93 000
    cubic yards and 14,000 drums of hazardous materials- Ex-
    traction  and treatment of ground water, including a 30-year
    monitoring  program; and An  interactive community relations
    program  that fostered  public participation  in  the cleanup
    process.
   Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
   posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S  Canada
   and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available  in
   paper copy or microfiche. 6p.
   Subject index keywords:  Superfund, Hazardous  materials
   Waste management.

 0950  Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Cleanup
   Efforts Nationwide, Fall 1993 (Brown Wood Preserving
   Site Profile, Suwanee County, Florida)
   Order Number PB94-963601CDH, price: Standing Order call
   for price
   Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
   bolid Waste and Emergency Response; 1993
   The Superfund at Work bulletin  series  profiles  hazardous
   waste cleanup efforts nationwide. This issue  profiles  the
   Brown Wood Preserving Site  near Live Oak, Florida, where
   creosote and other toxic chemicals used for pressure-treat-
   ing lumber and other wood products  polluted 55 acres of
   Suwanee  County, Florida. Much of the  indigenous  wildlife
   disappeared from the area due to progressive soil and sur-
   Sff W5er contaminat'on. Cleanup activities costing nearly
   $2.8 million were funded by the facility owners under a coop-
   erative settlement agreement, called a consent decree.
   Specifications: Paper copy  available on Standing Order, de-
   posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada
   and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
   paper copy or microfiche. 6p.
  Subject index keywords: Superfund, Hazardous  materials
  Waste management.

0951  Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Cleanup
  Efforts Nationwide, Fall 1993 (Bunker Hill Site Profile
  Silver Valley, Northern Idaho)
  Order Number PB94-963604CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
  Environmental Protection  Agency, Washington, DC.  Office of
  bolid Waste and Emergency Response;  1993
  Residents  in  the communities  surrounding  the Bunker Hill
  smelter facility in northern Idaho faced a dangerous problem-
  extensive lead contamination from decades of refining mined
  ores. Stack emissions caused a variety of environmental and
  human  health problems.  Other organizations intervened  to
  conduct a variety of activities including: A lead health screen-
  ing and education program; Removal and  replacement  of
  contaminated soil at public parks and playgrounds; Removal
  and replacement of contaminated residential yard  soil; and
  Efforts to  rebuild the local economy following the  facility's
  closure.                        ,
   Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
   posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
   and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
   paper copy or microfiche. 6p.
   Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste dis-
   posal, Cleanup, Superfund, Northern Region(ldaho).

 0952  Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Cleanup
   Efforts Nationwide, Fall 1993 (Johns-Manville Site Profile,
   Illinois)
   Order Number PB94-963602CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
   Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
   Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 1993
   The Superfund  at Work Bulletin  senes profiles hazardous
   waste cleanup efforts nationwide. This issue profiles the
   Johns-Manville  Superfund  site. Manufacturing  wastes laden
   with asbestos and toxic  substances were dumped  for more
   than 70 years into pits forming an enormous landfill. Industri-
   al wastewater pooled into  acres of settling  ponds. Airborne
   asbestos  endangered workers and  threatened ecological
   habitat in  an adjacent state park and along Lake Michigan.
   Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
   posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
   and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
   paper copy or microfiche. 6p.
  Subject index  keywords:  Hazardous materials, Asbestos,
   Cleanup,   Superfund, Pollution   control,   Heavy   metals,
  Profile(lllinois).

0953  Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Cleanup
  Efforts Nationwide (McKin Company)
  Order Number PB92-963620CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
  Environmental Protection  Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Waste Programs Enforcement;  1992
  The Fact Sheet profiles the McKin Company Site,  a waste
  collection,  transfer, and disposal facility in Gray, Maine, and
  that site's  successful cleanup. The McKin site is hailed as
  one of the  most successful  Superfund cleanups in New Eng-
  land and the nation. The site has proven to  be a landmark
  achievement in public and private cooperation since its dis-
  covery over ten years ago. The U.S. Environmental Protec-
  tion  Agency  (EPA), the State  of Maine, local officials,  and
  companies  responsible for contributing to the contamination
  worked closely together to identify threats to  the community
  and the surrounding area, remove hazardous liquids,  and de-
  contaminate  12,000 cubic yards of polluted  soil. The resi-
  dents of Gray, Maine  can now rest assured that hazardous
  waste at the McKin site no longer threatens their community.
  Specifications: Paper copy  available on Standing Order, de-
  posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
  and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
 paper copy  or microfiche. 9p.
 Subject index keywords: Superfund, Hazardous materials,
 Waste  management, Office  of Solid Waste and Emergency
 Response.
                                                                                                              177

-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Public Information &
Outreach
0954  Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Cleanup
  Efforts Nationwide, Spring 1993 (French Limited Site
  Profile, Harris County, Texas)
  Order Number PB93-963609CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 1993
  The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) negotiated
  a major cleanup at the French Limited site,  working with the
  Texas Water Commission (TWC)  and the French  Limited
  Task Group (FLTG). EPA's Superfund program: employed an
  innovative technology to clean  up 300,000 cubic yards  of
  hazardous waste;  negotiated an agreement,  known as a  con-
  sent decree,  in which FLTG pays  for all cleanup  costs and
  future oversight expenses; ensured the planting and preser-
  vation of 23  acres of wetlands  near the site; and awarded
  the nation's 75th Superfund Technical Assistance Grant to a
  local group so that the community is kept informed. Coopera-
  tion  between all  parties demonstrates how  the  Superfund
  program cleans up hazardous waste sites.
  Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing  Order, de-
  posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
  and  Mexico;  all others $400). Single copies also available in
  paper copy or microfiche. 6p.
  Subject index keywords: Superfund, Texas,  Hazardous ma-
  terials, Waste disposal, Remedial action, Cleanup operations,
  Bioremedlation.
 0955  Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste  Cleanup
  Efforts Nationwide, Spring 1993  (Fulton Terminals Site
  Profile, Oswego  County, NY)
  Order Number PB93-963616CDH,  price: PC A02/MF A01
   Environmental  Protection Agency,  Washington, DC. Office of
   Solid Waste  and Emergency Response; 1993
   The  U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) achieved
   some unique successes at the Fulton Terminals hazardous
   waste site in New York. After 35 years as a manufacturing
   facility, millions of gallons of waste oils and sludges were im-
   properly stored here enroute to  an incinerator. Tank  leaks
   and  spillage  contaminated  soil, ground  water  and  the
   Oswego River. EPA's Superfund program: Settled with  59 of
   60 hazardous  waste contributors to conduct a comprehen-
   sive $4 million cleanup and reimburse EPA $500,000 for past
   costs; Created an unprecedented financial arrangement that
   guaranteed payments from both major and minor parties, en-
   suring the timely cleanup of the site; and  Worked with area
   citizens to  award  a Technical Assistance  Grant,  ensuring
   their participation in the selection of the remedy and in the
   oversight of  cleanup operations.
   Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
   posit account  required (minimum  deposit $225 U.S., Canada,
   and Mexico; all others $450). Single copies also  available in
   paper copy or microfiche. 6p.
   Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste disposal, Haz-
   ardous materials, Pollution control, Fulton(New York).
  0956  Superfund  at Work: Hazardous Waste Cleanup
   Efforts Nationwide, Spring 1993 (Harvey and Knott Drum
   Site, New Castle County, Delaware)
   Order Number PB93-963614CDH, price: PC A01/MF A01
   Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
   Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 1993
   From 1963  to 1969, two acres of the Harvey and Knott Drum
   site in  New Castle  County, Delaware served as an  open
   dump and burning area for sanitary, municipal, and industrial
 wastes. Sludge,  paint pigment, and  solvents contaminated
 the site until the State of Delaware and the U.S. Environmen-
 tal Protection Agency (EPA) intervened in 1981. Site condi-
 tions required a combination of traditional  cleanup measures.
 After the immediate  health threats posed by the  site were
 eliminated,  EPA  reached an innovative, 'mixed funding  set-
 tlement for  long-term cleanup with two parties responsible
 for the site contamination. The following actions highlight the
 success of the Superfund program: An emergency removal
 of  contaminants reduced  immediate  environmental  and
 public  health effects; A rapid assessment of ground water
 safeguarded drinking water  supplies; and The full coopera-
 tion of General Motors (GM) expedited implementation of the
 cleanup, valued at $3.2 million.
 Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
 posit account required (minimum deposit $225 U.S., Canada,
 and Mexico; all others $450).  Single  copies also available in
 paper  copy or microfiche. 5p.
 Subject index keywords: Superfund, Hazardous materials,
 Waste  disposal,  Water  pollution  control,  New  Castle
 County (Delaware).
0957  Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Cleanup
  Efforts Nationwide, Spring 1993 (Old Midland Products
  Site Profile, Yell County, Arkansas)
  Order Number PB93-963608CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 1993
  The Old Midland Products site in Yell County, Arkansas was
  contaminated by hazardous chemicals from operations of a
  wood  preserving plant. The  U.S. Environmental  Protection
  Aqency (EPA) worked closely with the Arkansas Department
  of Pollution Control and Ecology (ADPCE) to select a clean-
  up plan to remediate the site, allowing  unrestricted use by
  1998. EPA and ADPCE actions consisted of: treating over 11
  million gallons of contaminated surface water and lagoon liq-
  uids; employing a highly efficient, transportable incinerator to
  destroy more  than  85,000 tons of contaminated  soil and
  lagoon sludges over a short  period  of time; installing recov-
  ery wells to treat an estimated 450,000 gallons of  contami-
  nated ground water; and maintaining effective community re-
  lations with local residents to address their concerns and in-
  volve them in the cleanup process. The site serves as an ex-
  ample of how EPA, state agencies, and local residents can
  work  together to restore the environment polluted by hazard-
  ous waste.
  Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
  posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
  and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also  available in
  paper copy or microfiche. 6p.
  Subject index keywords: Superfund, Arkansas, Waste dis-
  posal, Remedial action, Hazardous materials, Cleanup oper-
  ations.
 0958   Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Cleanup
   Efforts Nationwide, Spring  1993 (Powersville Site Profile,
   Peach County, Georgia)                      „_.„.,
   Order Number PB93-963611CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
   Environmental  Protection Agency, Washington, DC.  Office of
   Solid Waste and Emergency  Response;  1993
   The  U.S.  Environmental  Protection Agency  (EPA) encoun-
   tered much more than a municipal landfill at  the Powersville
   site in Peach County, Georgia. Contamination from improper-
  178

-------
                                                              PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Public Information &
                                                                                                           Outreach
    ly dumped hazardous wastes and pesticides tainted an old
    quarry used for household garbage. Chemicals migrating into
    ^JZ^  r^ threatened toca" drinking watlr supples
    To  address  these ,ssues, EPA's Superfund program de-
          LCHeahUP StrfSgy that included: negotiating" with the
          and chemical companies  to contain  the  hazardous
           °"sltf. underneath a protective cover; investigating
    h£?1nkir!? W«er contamination and extending munic-
    pal  water Imes to affected residents; and  conducting a tai-
    Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order de-
    posit account required (minimum deposit $225 U S  Canada
                  keywords:  Georgia, Earth fills,  Pesticides,


        Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Cleanup
        rts Nationwide, Spring 1993 (Radium Chemical Site
         >, Queens, New York)
   Order Number PB93-963612CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
   Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
   Solid Waste and Emergency Response;  1993
   The Radium Chemical hazardous waste site in Queens  New
   York was contaminated with radium, posing a grave potential
   Anp™ °/Pp^COTTty- The U'S- Environmental Protection
   Agency (EPA) used the Superfund program to design a long-
   te m  cleanup  for the site using input from citizeni  and the
   business  community.  Superfund  staff:  Mobilized a  quick
   cleanun action to remove 10,000 small containers of radium-
          ed a streamlined approach to long-term cleanup- Se-
        the site to reduce the possibility of radiation exposure
   to the  local residents; Cooperated  with the community to
             I-prganized emergency response plan; and Edu-
             citizens about site hazards, incorporating commu-
               into the  cleanup process.  The Radium Chemi-
   cal site is a clear example of EPA's effective  management
   and problem-solving strategies at Superfund sites.  a9ement
   Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order de-
   posit account required  (minimum deposit $225 U.S Canada
   and Mexico; all others  $450). Single copies also available in
  paper copy or microfiche. 6p.

  mS!t?inRfmkHeyW°rtdS: New York' Superfund, Radioactive
  materials, Remedial action.

°9!« JU£,e7-Und % W°rk: Hazardous Waste Cleanup
  IKaSaT   ' SPri"9 1"3 
-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Public Information &
Outreach
  Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste dis-
  posal, Cleanup, Superfund, York County(Virginia).

0964  Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Cleanup
  Efforts Nationwide, Summer 1993 (Coal Creek Site
  Profile, Chehalis, Washington)
  Order Number PB94-963609CDH, price: Standing Order, call
  for price
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 1993
  The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) designed a
  remedy that will permanently remove polychlorinated biphen-
  yls  (PCBs), lead, and copper from the Coal Creek  site in
  Chehalis, Washington. Through careful negotiations, EPA se-
  cured the participation of all 86 waste  contributors to con-
  duct the  cleanup, valued between $13 and $15 million. The
  Coal Creek site illustrates the need for a federal enforcement
  program  to ensure that waste contributors conduct compre-
  hensive cleanups that protect citizens and the environment.
  EPA took the lead in coordinating cleanup activities, an im-
  portant intervention at a time when the state did not yet have
  its own hazardous waste cleanup law.
  Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing  Order, de-
  posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
  and Mexico;  all others $400). Single copies also available in
  paper copy or microfiche. 6p.
  Subject  index keywords:  Superfund, Hazardous materials,
  Waste management.
 0965  Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Cleanup
   Efforts Nationwide, Summer 1993 (Common Steps in the
   Removal Process)
   Order Number PB93-963631CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
   Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
   Solid Waste  and Emergency Response; 1993
   The  Superfund at  Work bulletin  series profiles  hazardous
   waste cleanup efforts nationwide. This issue profiles removal
   efforts in Region 1. The removal team quickly responds to
   hazardous waste emergencies and undertakes  early actions
   at abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous waste sites. These
   activities generally cost  less than $2 million and last no more
   than 12 months.
   Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
   posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
   and  Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
   paper copy or microfiche. 6p.
   Subject  Index keywords: Hazardous  materials,  Waste dis-
   poSal, Cleanup, Superfund, Boston(Massachusetts).

  0966  Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Cleanup
   Efforts Nationwide, Summer 1993 (Eastern Diversified
   Metals Site  Profile, Schuylkiil County, Pennsylvania)
   Order Number PB93-963628CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
   Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
   Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 1993
   The Superfund  at Work bulletin series profiles  hazardous
   waste  cleanup efforts   nationwide. This issue profiles the
   Eastern  Diversified Metals Site in Rush Township, Schuylkiil
   County,  PA, where more than  350  million pounds of plastic
   insulation was found forming an enormous mountain on the
   property. This was the firs
   Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
   posit account required  (minimum deposit $200  U.S., Canada,
  and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
  paper copy or microfiche. 6p.
  Subject index keywords: Hazardous  materials, Waste dis-
  posal,  Cleanup, Superfund,  Rush  Township(Pennsylvania),
  Schuylkiil County(Pennsylvania).

0967  Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Cleanup
  Efforts Nationwide, Summer 1993 (Fike/Artel Chemical
  Site Profile, Nitro, West Virginia)
  Order Number PB93-963626CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Solid Waste and Emergency  Response; 1993
  The Superfund  at  Work bulletin  series profiles  hazardous
  waste  cleanup  efforts  nationwide.  The issue profiles  the
  Fike/Artel Chemical Site in Nitro,  West Virginia, where  a
  composite of highly toxic and  potentially explosive contami-
  nants were dumped. The site is a good  example of how
  EPA's  Superfund program responds to emergency situations
  by taking quick  actions as well as cleaning up large volumes
  of hazardous  waste.
  Specifications: Paper copy  available on Standing Order, de-
  posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
  and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
  paper copy or microfiche. 6p.
  Subject index  keywords: Hazardous  materials,  Waste dis-
  posal,  Cleanup, Superfund, Nitro(West  Virginia).

 0968  Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Cleanup
  Efforts Nationwide, Summer 1993 (Northside Landfill Site
  Profile, Spokane, Washington)
  Order  Number PB94-963611CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 1993
  Cleanup of the Northside Landfill in Spokane, Washington is
  an example  of effective collaboration with  state and local
  governments in addressing a Superfund  hazardous waste
  site. City officials recognized that the landfill had reached ca-
  pacity  local wells were contaminated,  and ground water
   needed thorough treatment. EPA  and Ecology worked with
  Spokane's Department of Solid Waste Management to: Pro-
   vide a clean source of drinking water and construct a state-
   of-the-art plastic cover to cap the landfill  and guard against
   the further spread  of contaminants.
   Specifications: Paper copy available  on Standing Order, de-
   posit account required  (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
   and Mexico; all others  $400). Single copies  also available in
   paper copy or microfiche. 6p.
   Subject index keywords:  Hazardous materials, Waste dis-
   posal, Cleanup, Superfund,  Spokane(Washington State).

  0969 Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Cleanup
   Efforts Nationwide, Summer 1993 (Rogue Valley/Ditch
   Creek Ranch Site Profile,  Wimer, Oregon)
   Order Number PB93-963629CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
   Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
   Solid  Waste and Emergency Response; 1993
   The Superfund at Work  bulletin  series  profiles hazardous
   waste cleanup efforts nationwide. This  issue  profiles  the
   Rogue  Valley/Ditch Creek Ranch Site in  Wimer, Oregon,
   where a company president used his own  rach to illegally
   dump industrial wastes generated at his electroplating facility
   in a nearby town.  The  contamination  spread over 18 acres of
   the Ditch Creek Ranch, endangering local water supplies and
  180

-------
                                                               PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Public Information &
                                                                                                           Outreach
    wildlife This case was the largest criminal action ever taken
    in tne State of Oregon for environmental pollution.
    Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order de-
    posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U S  Canada
    and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
    paper copy or microfiche. 6p.
    Subject index keywords: Hazardous wastes, Waste dispos-
    al, Cleanup, Superfund, Wimer(Oregon).

  0970  Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Cleanup
    Efforts Nationwide, Summer 1993 (Tri-State Plating Site
    Profile, Columbus, Indiana)
    Order Number PB93-963615CDH, price: PC A02
    InrLr^,mental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
    bond Waste and Emergency Response; 1993
    The U.S. Environmental  Protection Agency (EPA) cleans up
    hazardous wastes on land, in the air, and in water Each Su-
    perfund site is uniquely problematic, therefore every cleanup
    selected must meet the specific needs of the community At
    the Tri-State Plating site in Columbus, Indiana, EPA removed
    27 barrels of electroplating waste from this quiet neighbor-
    hood site; demolished on-site buildings and removed  more
    than 2,400 cubic yards of contaminated soil; and accessed a
    municipal wastewater treatment plant to treat polluted ground
   water, saving approximately $700,000 in costs. In addition to
   trimming five years off the cleanup schedule, EPA addressed
   community  concerns regarding the actions beinq taken to
   remedy the site for future use.
   Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order de-
   posit account required  (minimum deposit $225 U.S., Canada
   and Mexico; all others  $450). Single copies also available in
   paper copy or microfiche. 6p.
   Subject index keywords: Superfund, Remedial action,  Haz-
   ardous materials, Waste  management,  Water pollution  con-
   trol, Cleanup operations.

 0971  Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Cleanup
   Efforts Nationwide (White Chemical)
   Order Number PB92-963611CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
   Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
   Waste Programs Enforcement; 1992
   The Superfund at Work  Bulletin  series profiles  hazardous
   waste cleanup efforts  nationwide. This issue  profiles  the
   White Chemical site, a former chemical  processing facility in
   Newark, New Jersey, where nearly 11,000 drums of hazard-
   ous  waste and  chemical  contaminants were stored from
   1984 to 1989.
   Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order de-
   posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U S  Canada
   and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
   paper copy or microfiche. 8p.
  Subject index keywords: Superfund, Hazardous  materials
  Waste management,  Office of Solid Waste and Emerqencv
  Response.                                        a    y

0972  Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Cleanup
  Efforts Nationwide, Winter 1993. (Wells G  and H Site
  Woburn, Massachusetts)
  Order Number PB93-963601CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC.  Office of
  Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 1993
  The document profiles the Superfund cleanup of the Weils G
  and H site in Woburn, Massachusetts. One  year later com-
  prehensive cleanup  activities have begun at four of the site's
   five property areas. Contamination of the wells was discov-
   ered in 1979 when local residents suspected that an unusu-
   ally high incidence of childhood leukemia was linked to  drink-
   ing water.  EPA's Superfund enforcement efforts yielded a
   resolution in which:  settling parties  agreed to a cleanup
   worth approximately $70 million, the largest Superfund settle-
   ment in New England. The agreement directs cleanup of four
   properties simultaneously; EPA achieved the record settle-
   ment in only four months of  negotiations; and initially recalci-
   trant polluters realized they  were  better off cooperating with
   the Superfund proces, and  are working with both EPA and
   the community as partners.
   Specifications: Paper copy  available on Standing Order, de-
   posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
   and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
   paper copy or microfiche. 6p.
   Subject  index  keywords:  Superfund,  Remedial  action,
   Waste management, Hazardous materials, Cleanup.

 0973  Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Cleanup
   Efforts Nationwide, Winter  1994  (Bailey Waste Disposal
   Site Profile, Texas)
   Order Number PB94-963613CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
   Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
   Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 1994
   The U.S. Environmental  Protection Agency (EPA), the Texas
   Natural  Resource Conservation Commission  (TNRCC), and
   10 private companies have succeeded  in suspending serious
   environmental damage at the Bailey  Waste  Disposal  Site.
   Through EPA's Superfund program, the cleanup will prevent
   the spread of hazardous petroleum  compounds and heavy
   metals into valuable wetlands leading to the Gulf of Mexico.
   Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
   posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
   and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
   paper copy or microfiche. 6p.
  Subject index keywords: Hazardous  materials, Waste  dis-
  posal, Cleanup, Superfund.

0974  Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Cleanup
  Efforts Nationwide, Winter 1994 (New Brighton Site
  Profile, Minneapolis/St.  Paul, Minnesota)
  Order Number PB94-963615CDH, price: Standing Order, call
  for price
  Environmental Protection  Agency, Washington,  DC. Office of
  Solid Waste and Emergency Response;  1994
  Billions  of rounds  of small-arms ammunition were manufac-
  tured at the Twin  Cities Army Ammunition Plant  (TCAAP),
  supporting the military in three major wars. During the course
  of production, solvents and hazardous  chemical wastes  mi-
  grated into area ground water, contaminating municipal  and
  private wells. Highlights of the overall cleanup effort have in-
  cluded^ removal of nearly 232,000  pounds of solvents from
  soil  using an  innovative  technology, soil vapor extraction;
  treatment of more than six billion  gallons of  ground water
  from TCAAP extraction wells;  and construction of two treat-
  ment plants to purify municipal water supplies in neighboring
  cities. The TCAAP property includes wetlands and undis-
  turbed natural  habitat supporting an  extensive variety of wild-
  life. Related cleanup efforts will protect a sensitive ecosys-
  tem currently sustained as a refuge  despite increasing urban
  pressures.
                                                                                                               181

-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION; QA/QC Laboratory
Program
  Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing order, de-
  posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
  and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
  paper copy or microfiche. 6p.
  Subject Index keywords: Superfund,  Hazardous materials,
  Waste management.
0975  Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Cleanup
  Efforts Nationwide, Winter 1994 (Seymour Recycling Site
  Profile, Seymour, Indiana)
  Order Number  PB94-963612CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
  Environmental  Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 1994
  Leaking barrels of chemicals reacted and erupted into spon-
  taneous fires and explosions at the Seymour Recycling Cor-
  poration  in  the 1970s. The  poorly managed  and overbur-
  dened hazardous waste storage and incineration facility pol-
  luted  soil and  ground water with solvents,  acids, and  heavy
  metals. With help from the  Indiana Department of Environ-
  mental Management (IDEM) and the City of Seymour, coop-
  erative efforts  lead to an effective remediation of the site in-
  cluding: an  immediate removal of  drums, tanks and soil; a
  comprehensive ground water treatment system and exten-
  sion of the municipal water supply to affected residents; and
  use of two  innovative technologies, bioremediation and soil
  vapor extraction.
  Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
  posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
  and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
  paper copy or microfiche. 6p.
  Subject  Index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste dis-
  posal, Cleanup, Superfund, Semour(lndiana).
 0976  Superfund: Environmental Progress
  Order Number PB93-206209CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Emergency and Remedial Response; Nov 90
  While Superfund has made many gains in terms of protection
   of  human health arid the environment, to date  little attention
   has been  paid to any measures other than the number of
   sites deleted from the National Priorities List. The report ex-
   plains some of Superfund's environmental progress in terms
   of  new measures called environmental indicators. These indi-
   cators relate to: (1) Controlling Acute  Threats to People and
   the Environment; (2) Achieving Long-Term Cleanup Goals for
   Sites; and  (3) Removing  Contamination from  the Environ-
   ment.
   Specifications: See also PB91-921203. 14p.
   Subject index keywords:  Superfund, Project management,
   Progress.
 0977  Superfund Program: Ten Years of Progress
   Order Number PB91-921286CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
   Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
   Emergency and Remedial Response; Jun 91
   The  review provides a candid self-evaluation of past program
   activities and achievements, identifies conflicting mandates
   and  needs for program enhancements, and makes a commit-
   ment to following a practical plan for the future. This plan is
   based  on a set of eight strategic goals.  The contents  are:
   Legislative and  Regulatory Framework;  Removal  Actions;
   Site Assessment  Activities; Remedial Activity;  The Enforce-
   ment Program;  Public Participation In Decisionmaking; Roles
   of States  and Indian  Tribes; Management  Infrastructure;
  Future Directions and Challenges; EPA Superfund Offices;
  and For More Information.
  Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
  posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
  and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
  paper copy or microfiche. 52p.
  Subject  index  keywords:  Hazardous  materials,  Project
  management, US EPA, Reviews, Superfund.

0978  Understanding Oil  Spills and Oil Spill Response
  Order Number PB93-963409CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Emergency and Remedial Response; Oct 93
  The volume contains individual sections that outline what oil
  spills are, their  potential effects on the environment,  how
  they are cleaned up, and how various agencies prepare for
  spills before they happen.
  Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
  posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
  and Mexico;  all others $400). Single copies also available  in
  paper copy or microfiche. 56p.
  Subject  index  keywords: Environmental protection, Oil
  spills, Water  pollution effects.


 PROGRAM  IMPLEMENTATION; QA/

 QC Laboratory Program

 0979  Data Quality Objectives Decision Error Feasibility
  Trials (DEFT) Beta Version 1.01. User's Guide
  Order Number PB94-963222CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Emergency and Remedial Response; 2 Aug 93
  One of the most intensive steps in the Data Quality Objec-
  tives (DQO)  Process is the final step, Optimize the Design.
  During this step, the entire set of DQO outputs are incorpo-
  rated into a  sampling design. If the DQO constraints are not
  feasible,  it may be necessary to iterate through one or  more
  of the earlier steps of  the DQO Process to identify a  sam-
  pling design that will meet the budget and generate data that
  are adequate for the decision. The proposed PC  package
  should reduce the intensiveness of this step by allowing a
  decision  maker  or member of the DQO  planning team  to
  generate information about several simple sampling designs
  based on the DQO constraints. Through this process, the de-
  cision maker can evaluate whether these constraints are ap-
   propriate or feasible before the sampling and analysis design
   team begins identifying  a sampling design.
   Specifications:  Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
   posit account required  (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
   and Mexico; all  others  $400). Single copies also available in
   paper copy or microfiche. 9p.
   Subject index  keywords:  Superfund, Pollution sampling,
   Data Quality Objectives.
  182

-------
                                                                PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION; QA/QC Laboratory
                                                                                                           Program
  0980  Data Quality Objectives for Remedial Response
    Activities: Development Process. Example Scenario- Rl/
    FS Activities at a Site with Contaminated Soils and "
    Ground Water
    Order Number PB90-272634CDH, price: PC A13/MF A02
    COM Federal Programs Corp., Annandale, VA •
    Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC Office of
    Emergency and Remedial Response; Mar 87
    The two volumes provide guidance for developing data qual-
    ity  objectives  (DQOs)  for site-specific Remedial Investiga-
    tion/Feasibility Study (RI/FS) activities. Qualitative and quan-
   titative  standards required to support RI/FS activities are
    specified. A formal approach to the development of DQOs in
    the sampling/analytical plan to improve the quality and cost-
    effectiveness of data collection and analysis activities is pro-
    vided.

    Specifications:   Also pub.  as  Environmental  Protection
    Agency, Washington, DC. Office of Emergency and Remedial
    onloTIf rept n0" OSWER DIRECTIVE-9355.0-7B. See also
    PB88-131370 and PB88-131388. Sponsored by Environmen-
   tal Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of Emergency
   and Remedial Response. 287p.
   Subject index keywords: Waste disposal, Guidelines  US
   EPA Regions 1-10, Remedial action, Remedial response  Su-
   perfund.

 0981  Data Quality Objectives Process for Superfund
   Order Number PB94-963205CDH, price: PC  A01/MF A01
   Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
   Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 93
   The fact sheet  describes the Interim Final Guidance on the
   ?olo,Q^'ty 0bJectives Process for Superfund (September
   1993). The new guidance supersedes previous 1987 Super-
   fund  guidance  on Data Quality Objectives  (DQOs)  Data
   Quality Objectives for Remedial Response Activities- Devel-
   opment  Process,  EPA/540/G-87/003  (PB88-131370)  The
   fact sheet also introduces the Guidance for Conducting Envi-
   ronmental Data  Quality Assessment and the DQO Decision
   Error Feasibility Trials software.
  Specifications:  Paper copy available on Standing Order de-
  posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U S  Canada
  and Mexico;  all others $400). Single copies  also available in
  paper copy or microfiche. 4p.
  Subject index keywords:  Superfund, Hazardous  materials,
  Data Quality Objectives.

0982  Data Quality  Objectives Process for Superfund
  Order Number PB94-963207CDH, price: PC A01/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Emergency and Remedial Response; Nov 93
  The pamphlet describes the Data Quality Objectives Process
  for Superfund.
  Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order  de-
  posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S  Canada
  and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
  paper copy or microfiche. 2p.
  Subject index keywords: Superfund,  Data quality, Pollution
  sampling.
 0983   Data Quality Objectives Process for Superfund:
   Interim Final Guidance
   Order Number PB94-963203CDH, price: PC A07/MF A02
   Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
   Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 93
   This document provides guidance on developing Data Quality
   Objectives (DQOs) for  Superfund  sites. This guidance re-
   places EPA/540/G-87/003, Data Quality Objectives for Re-
   medial Response Activities: Development Process  (PB90-
   272634).  The DQO Process is a series of planning steps
   based on the Scientific Method that is designed to  ensure
   that the type, quantity, and quality of enviromental data used
   in decision making are appropriate for the intended applica-
   tion.  The DQO  Process was  developed by  EPA to  help
   Agency personnel collect data that are important to decision
   making. The process allows decision  makers  to define  their
   data requirements and acceptable levels of decision errors
   during planning, before any data are collected. Application of
   the DQO  Process should result in data collection designs
   that will yield  results of appropriate quality for  defensible de-
   cision making.
   Specifications: Paper  copy available on Standing Order, de-
   posit account required  (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada
   and Mexico; all others  $400). Single copies  also available in
  paper copy or microfiche. 136p.
  Subject index  keywords:  Superfund,  Pollution  sampling
  Data Quality Objectives.

0984  Data Quality Objectives Process for Superfund-
  Workbook
  Order  Number PB94-963204CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington,  DC. Office of
  Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 93
  The workbook assists  the user in  implementing the Data
  Quality Objective (DQO) Process for Superfund by providing
  concise descriptions of each of the seven steps as well as
  space  to document the outputs of  the current study. The
  workbook is organized  in a sequential, step-by-step fashion
  to help the user consider all aspects  in the DQO planning
  Process. The steps described are as follows: State the Prob-
  lem; Identify the Decision; Identify the Inputs to the Decision;
  Define  the Boundaries  of the Study;  Develop a Decision
  Rule; Specify Limits on Decision Errors; and  Optimize the
 Design. Each step  is one  component in the DQO Process.
 The first section of  this workbook provides a summary of the
 purpose  of each step.  If  more detailed information  is  re-
 quired,  the reader  should  refer to 'Data Quality Objectives
 Process for Superfund:  Interim  Final  Guidance,' EPA540-R-
 93-071  (PB94-963203).  Following the summaries, each step
 is discussed in detail, listing all the activities that should be
 considered to complete that step.
 Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
 posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
 and Mexico; all others $400).  Single copies also available in
 paper copy or microfiche. 42p.
 Subject index keywords: Superfund, Pollution sampling
 Data Quality Objectives.
                                                                                                             183

-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION; QA/QC Laboratory
Program
0985  Decentralization of Superfund Bottle Repository
  Functions
  Order Number PB90-249558CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Emergency and Remedial Response; 1 Sep 89
  The directive provides guidance for decentralizing the acqui-
  sition of Superfund sampling bottles from OERR to the Re-
  gions and their support contractors. It reiterates and expands
  on  information  previously provided  to the  Environmental
  Services Division personnel responsible for bottle acquisition.
  Specifications: 43p.
  Subject       index       keywords:        Regulations,
  Decentralization(Dispersal),  Superfund,  Bottle  repositories,
  Preremedial action,  Sampling bottles, Office of Solid Waste
  and Emergency Response.
 0986  Extending the Tracking of Analytical Services to
  Potentially Responsible Party-Lead Superfund Sites
  (Supplemental Guidance on OSWER Directive 9240.0-2A)
  Order Number PB93-963502CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 6 Jul 92
  The memorandum provides procedures for tracking Potential-
  ly Responsible Party (PRP) analytical services on a national
  basis In accordance with EPA policy.
  Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
   posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
   and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available  in
   paper copy or microfiche. 24p.
   Subject Index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
   Hazardous materials, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
   Response, Potentially responsible  parties.
 0987  Guidance on Applying the Data Quality Objectives
   Process for Ambient Air Monitoring Around Superfund
   Sites (Stage 3)
   Order Number PB90-204611CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
   Research  Triangle Inst, Research Triangle Park, NC.;
   Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park,
   NO. Office of Air Quality Planning  and Standards; Mar 90
   The document along with a previous document (EPA-450/4-
   89-015, August 1989) covering Stages I and II, provides an
   illustration of how the data quality objectives (DQO) process
   is used to design an ambient air monitoring  system that will
   be adequate for the intended use of the data. The two docu-
   ments combined are intended to  serve as a bridge between
   the  Quality Assurance Management  Staff's  (QAMS1) DQO
   guidance  and an actual application of the DQO process at a
   Superfund site. The document illustrates the process of de-
   veloping a monitoring system for volatile organic compounds
   in the ambient air to the point of submitting the design to the
    decision maker for approval.
    Specifications: See also PB90-204603.  Sponsored by Envi-
    ronmental Protection Agency,  Research Triangle Park, NC.
    Office of  Air Quality Planning and Standards. 66p.
    Subject index keywords: Monitoring, Air pollution, Hazard-
    ous materials, Superfund.
0988  Guidance on Applying the Data Quality Objectives
  Process for Ambient Air Monitoring Around Superfund
  Sites (Stages 1 and 2)
  Order Number PB90-204603CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
  Research Triangle Inst., Research Triangle Park, NC.;
  Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park,
  NC. Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards; Aug  89
  The document provides direction and assistance on how the
  data quality objectives process is used to design an ambient
  air monitoring system around a Superfund site. Examples are
  given for Stage I  (preliminary decision) and Stage II  (refine-
  ment of the decision and requirements) for monitoring during
  remedial action at a hypothetical Superfund site.
  Specifications: See also PB90-204611. Sponsored by Envi-
  ronmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, NC.
  Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards. 52p.
  Subject index keywords: Monitoring,  Air  pollution, Hazard-
  ous materials,  Superfund.
 0989  Harmonization of QA Procedures for Environmental
  Data Operations: Development of a National Consensus
  Standard for Quality Assurance for Environmental
  Programs
  Order Number PB91-240523CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
   Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park,
   NC  Quality Assurance Management Staff.; Bechtel
   Environmental, Inc., San Francisco, CA.**MAC Technical
   Services,  Germantown, MD.; Oct 91
   Decisions on where and how to clean-up Federally-owned fa-
   cilities contaminated by mixtures  of hazardous chemical  and
   radioactive wastes requires that  quality environmental data
   be obtained. The Federal Government is currently using sev-
   eral different standards or sets of requirements for establish-
   ing the quality assurance and quality control (QA/QC) proce-
   dures associated with  environmental  data  operations for
   these sites. These standards defined the  criteria for the QA
   activities  and documentation required,  the content  and
   format of the  documentation, and who was  responsible for
   implementation. Shortcomings in these standards of require-
   ments led in 1989 to efforts by several  public and private
   sector groups to 'harmonize' the multiple sets of standards
   and requirements into a single set. These efforts are being
   conducted under the auspices of the American Society for
   Quality Control (ASQC) and involve  participation by the Envi-
   ronmental Protection Agency (EPA),  Department of Energy
   (DOE) Department of  Defense  (DOD), Nuclear  Regulatory
   Commission (NRG), and others in the contractor and regulat-
   ed  communities. The  paper  describes the progress toward
   establishing a national consensus standard for QA for envi-
   ronmental  programs  through  the  ASQC standard-setting
   process.
    Specifications:   Pub. in the Proceedings of the Annual
    Energy Division  Conference  (19th)  of the American Society
    for  Quality Control, Oct 91.  Prepared in cooperation with
    Bechtel  Environmental, Inc., San Francisco, CA., and  MAO
    Technical Services, Germantown, MD. 21 p.
    Subject  index   keywords: Waste  management,  Federal
    agencies, Hazardous materials, Radioactive wastes, Environ-
    mental issues, Cleanup operations.
   184

-------
                                                               PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION; QA/QC Laboratory
                                                                                                          Program
 0990  Quality and Environmental Protection: The EPA QA
   Program
   Order Number PB92-143791CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
   Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Quality
   Assurance Management Staff; 1992
   Formalized quality assurance (QA) program requirements for
   the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) have been
   established for more than ten years. During this period, the
   environmental issues and concerns addressed  by the EPA
   have  changed.  Other  issues,  such  as  hazardous  waste
   clean-up and clean air,  remain a focus of national environ-
   mental concerns.  As environmental  issues in  the  1980s
   evolved, the QA  program of  the EPA  was  transformed
   through the use of Total Quality Management (TQM) princi-
   ples to meet the needs of the 1990s and beyond. The QA
   program is structured to provide the necessary management
   and technical processes to effectively  plan,  implement, and
   assess the results of work performed in environmental pro-
   grams.
   Specifications:  See also PB91 -240523. 9p.
   Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste man-
   agement, Quality assurance, Superfund.

 0991  Quality Assurance for Superfund Environmental
   Data Collection Activities
   Order Number PB93-963273CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
   Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
   Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Feb 93
   The fact sheet provides Superfund program participants with
   an overview of  Superfund  QA requirements for data collec-
   tion activities. The information is pertinent to all Superfund
   site managers, including  remedial project managers (RPMs),
   site assessment managers (SAMs), and on-scene coordina-
   tors (OSCs). The information also applies to Agency contrac-
   tors, states, and potentially responsible parties (PRPs) and
   their contractors. The fact sheet  addresses three primary
   areas:  (1)  the  mandatory QA  requirements  specified  in
   Agency policy documents; (2) QA management  for Super-
   fund; and (3) the process for developing SAPs for Superfund
   activities. References are identified after each primary sec-
   tion to provide  additional information  on discussion topics.
   These  reference materials contain guidance on the appropri-
   ate quality control (QC) considerations site  managers should
   include as part of the QA program.
  Specifications:  Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
   posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
  and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
  paper copy or microfiche. 12p.
  Subject index keywords: Superfund,  Hazardous materials,
  Waste disposal.

0992 Quality Assurance for the SITE (Superfund
  Innovative Technology Evaluation) Program
  Demonstrations
  Order Number PB90-159872CDH, price:  PC A02/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk
  Reduction Engineering Lab.; Maxwell Labs.,  Inc., San Dieqo
  CA;c1989
  The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency has implemented
  a rigorous quality assurance (QA) program to ensure that the
  performance data generated during their Superfund Innova-
  tive Technology  Evaluation (SITE) Demonstration projects
  are of known and adequate quality to support decisions to
  use such technologies for hazardous waste site characteriza-
   tions or remediations. A general overview of the ways in
   which the  QA program has been conducted and of the re-
   sults it has produced is presented.
   Specifications:  Pub. in Air and Waste Management Asso-
   ciation, v39 n4  p431-436  Apr 89. Prepared in cooperation
   with Maxwell Labs., Inc., San Diego, CA. 9p.
   Subject index keywords: Hazardous  materials,  Waste dis-
   posal, SITE program.

 0993  Quality Assurance/Quality Control Guidance for
   Removal Activities: Sampling QA/QC Plan and  Data
   Validation Procedures
   Order Number PB90-274481CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
   Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
   Emergency and Remedial Response; Apr 90
   This  document  provides  guidance for establishing,  imple-
   menting, and using Quality Assurance/Quality Control  (QA/
   QC) protocols in data collection activities performed under
   the Removal program. Also provides guidance in reviewing
   laboratory data packages according to the guidance estab-
   lished by the QA/QC protocols.
   Specifications:  66p.
   Subject index keywords:  Hazardous materials,  Guidelines,
   Quality  assurance, Quality control, Superfund,  Remedial
   action, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response.

 0994  Specifications and Guidance for  Contaminant-Free
   Sample Containers
   Order Number PB93-963316CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
   Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
   Solid Waste and  Emergency Response;  Dec 92
   The document revises specifications and provides a single
   source of standardized specifications and guidance on ap-
   propriate cleaning procedures for preparing contaminant-free
   containers that meet all Contract Laboratory Program  (CLP)
   detection/quantification limits,  including those for low  con-
   centration analyses.
   Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
   posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
   and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
   paper copy or microfiche. 32p.
   Subject  index  keywords: Pollution  control, Containers,
   Equipment specifications, Cleaning, Superfund.

0995 Superfund Analytical  Review and Oversight
  Order Number PB90-249541CDH, price:  PC A02/MF A01
   Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
   Emergency and Remedial Response; 18 Oct 88
  The directive outlines procedures and responsibilities related
  to review and oversight of Superfund analytical data.
  Specifications:  7p.
  Subject index keywords:  Regulations, Supervision, Super-
  fund, Preremedial action, Office of Solid Waste and Emer-
  gency Response.

0996  Total Quality Management (TQM)  and Quality
  Assurance  (QA) in  Superfund
  Order Number PB91-921333CDH, price:  PC A01/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Emergency and Remedial Response; 5 Dec 90
  The directive discusses the  support of Total Quality Manage-
  ment and Quality Assurance by the Director of the Office of
  Emergency and Remedial Response. It focuses especially on
                                                                                                              185

-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Removal Program
Management
  TQM as it relates to Super-fund's QA Program and the devel-
  opment of Data Quality Objective (DQOs) for the RI/FS and
  RD/RA processes.
  Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
  posit account required (minimum deposit $150 U.S., Canada,
  and Mexico; all others $300). Single copies also available in
  paper copy or microfiche. 4p.
  Subject index keywords: Superfund,  Waste management,
  Hazardous materials, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
  Response.
0997  USEPA Contract Laboratory Program National
  Functional Guidelines for Inorganic Data Review
  Order Number PB94-963502CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Emergency and Remedial Response; Feb 94
  This document is designed to  offer guidance on EPA  Con-
  tract Laboratory  Program (CLP)  inorganic analytical  data
  evaluation and review. In some applications it may be  used
  as a Standard Operating Procedure (SOP). In other, more
  subjective areas,  only general guidance is offered due to the
  complexities and  uniqueness of data relative to specific  sam-
  ples. This document  is  intended to assist in the technical
  review of analytical data generated through the CLP. Deter-
  mining contract compliance is  not the  intended objective of
  these guidelines.  The data review process provides informa-
  tion on analytical limitations of data based on specific quality
  control (QC) criteria. In order to provide more specific usabi-
  lity  statements, the reviewer must have a  complete under-
  standing of the intended use of the data. For this reason, it is
  recommended that whenever  possible the reviewer obtain
  usability issues from  the user  prior to reviewing the  data.
  When this is npt  possible, the user should be encouraged to
  communicate any questions to the reviewer.
  Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
  posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
  and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
  paper copy or microfiche" 46p.
  Subject Index keywords: Inorganic compounds, Superfund,
  Waste  management,  Land pollution, Office of Solid Waste
  and Emergency Response, Contract Laboratory Program.


 PROGRAM  IMPLEMENTATION:

 Removal  Program Management

 0998  Authorization for Regional Administrators to
  Approve Consistency Exemptions at NPL Sites
  Order Number PB92-963343CDH, price: PC A01/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Emergency and Remedial Response; 24 Feb 92
  The purpose of the directive is to provide Regional Adminis-
  trators with limited authority to approve exemptions from the
  $2,000,000 statutory limit on CERCLA removal actions. This
  authority is limited to consistency exemptions at proposed
  and final National Priorities List (NPL) sites.
  Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
  posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
  and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
  paper copy or microfiche. 3p.
  Subject Index keywords: Authorizations, Administrative per-
  sonnel, Hazardous materials, Directives, Superfund, National
  Priorities List.
0999  Conducting Non-Time-Critical Removal Actions
  under CERCLA
  Order Number PB93-963422CDH, price: PC A01/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Emergency and Remedial Response; Dec 93
  The fact sheet summarizes a document entitled 'Guidance
  on Conducting Non-Time-Critical  Removal Actions  Under
  CERCLA' (Oswer  Directive 9360.0-32). The guidance  de-
  scribes the essential  components of the  Non-Time-Critical
  Removal Action Process with particular emphasis placed on
  conducting the Engineering Evaluation/Cost Analysis (EE/
  CA).  The guidance is  to be used in conjunction with EPA's
  Emergency  Response Division  (ERD) Superfund  Removal
  Procedure (SRP) manual.
  Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
  posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
  and Mexico;  all others $400). Single copies also available in
  paper copy or microfiche. 4p.
  Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste  dis-
  posal, Cleanup, Superfund.

1000   Determination of Imminent and Substantial
  Endangerment for Removal Actions
  Order Number PB93-963416CDH, price: PC A01/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 19 Aug 93
  The memorandum clarifies the process for making endanger-
  ment determinations for removal actions pursuant to Delega-
  tion of Authority 14-14-A under Section 106 of CERCLA.
  Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
  posit account required (minimum deposit $225 U.S., Canada,
  and Mexico;  all others $450). Single copies also available in
  paper copy or microfiche. 2p.
  Subject index keywords: Superfund, Hazardous  materials,
  Risk assessment.
1001   Emergency Responders Agreements for Fund-Lead
  Remedial Actions
  Order Number PB93-963418CDH, price: Standing Order, call
  for price
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Emergency and Remedial Response; Mar 94
  The  Superfund program's contractors frequently rely on re-
  sponders from the local community  to provide emergency
  support during remedial action.  The fact sheet outlines rec-
  ommended procedures to establish site specific agreements
  with local  emergency  responders  for fund-lead remedial
  sites.
  Specifications: Paper copy available  on Standing Order, de-
  posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
  and  Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available  in
  paper copy or microfiche. 4p.
  Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Superfund,
  Emergency services, Lead(Metal), Remedial action.

 1002  Exemptions from the Statutory Limits on Removal
  Actions
  Order Number PB91-921304CDH, price: PC A01/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Emergency and Remedial Response; Nov 90
  The Fact Sheet summarizes two exemptions from the statu-
  tory time and dollar limits on removal actions provided for in
  section 104(c) of CERCLA. The first is the 'emergency' ex-
 186

-------
                                                               PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Removal Program
                                                                                                     Management
   emption for when a response action isimmediately required
   to protect public health or welfare or the  environment. The
   second is the 'consistency' exemption for when further re-
   sponse actions are appropriate and consistent.
   Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
   posit account required (minimum deposit $150 U.S., Canada,
   and  Mexico; all others $300). Single copies also available in
   paper copy or microfiche. 2p.
   Subject  index  keywords:  Superfund,   Remedial  action,
   Waste management, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
   Response,  Comprehensive Environmental Response Com-
   pensation and Liability Act.

 1003  Expedited Response Actions
   Order Number PB93-963410CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
   Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
   Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Jul 86
   The  document summarizes response action procedures in an
   attempt to clarify the distinction between expedited response
   actions and remedial actions.
   Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
   posit account required (minimum  deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
   and  Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
   paper copy or microfiche. 6p.
   Subject index keywords:  Superfund, Hazardous materials,
   Waste disposal, Expedited response action.

1004   Final Guidance on Implementation of the
  'Consistency' Exemption to the Statutory Limits on
  Removal Actions
  Order Number PB90-274465CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Emergency and Remedial Response; 12 Jun 89
  The  directive provides final guidance to Regions on the im-
  plementation of  the SARA $2  million/12-month  statutory
  limits on removal actions and exemption from the statutory
  limits for 'actions otherwise appropriate and consistent with
  the remedial action to be taken' (consistency exemption).
  Specifications:  8p.
  Subject index  keywords: Hazardous materials,  Guidelines,
  Superfund, Waste management,  Office of  Solid  Waste and
  Emergency Response, Remedial action.

1005  Guidance on Conducting Non-Time-Critical Removal
  Actions under CERCLA
  Order Number PB93-963402CDH, price: PC  A04/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Aug 93
  The purpose of the guidance is to provide information on the
  procedures and activities the U.S. Environmental Protection
  Agency (EPA) uses in  conducting non-time-critical removal
  actions under the Comprehensive Environmental Response,
  Compensation, and  Liability Act (CERCLA)  and the National
  Oil and Hazardous  Substances Pollution Contingency Plan
  (NCP). On-Scene Coordinators (OSCs) and Remedial Project
  Managers (RPMs) should use this guidance to ensure that
  non-time-critical removal actions  are conducted  in accord-
  ance  with applicable laws,  regulations, and  EPA policy. The
  guidance focuses primarily  on those aspects of the removal
  process that are unique to non-time-critical  removal actions.
  Specifications: Paper copy  available on Standing Order, de-
  posit  account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
   and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
   paper copy or microfiche. 67p.
   Subject index keywords: Superfund, Remediation, Risk as-
   sessment.

 1006  Guide to Removal Enforcement
   Order Number PB92-963419CDH, price: PC A01/MF A01
   Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office  of
   Emergency and Remedial Response; Jul 92
   The fact sheet  summarizes a Superfund Removal Proce-
   dures volume entitled 'Removal Enforcement Guidance  for
   On-Scene Coordinators' describing the essential components
   of  the  removal enforcement  process along with recent
   Agency enforcement initiatives  stemming from the Manage-
   ment Review of the Superfund Program (the '90-Day Study').
   Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
   posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
   and Mexico; all  others $400). Single copies also available in
   paper copy or microfiche. See also PB92-963409. 4p. '
   Subject index keywords: Superfund,  Waste management,
   Hazardous materials, Office of  Solid Waste and Emergency
   Response.

 1007  Guidelines for the Cleanup of Clandestine Drug
   Laboratories
   Order Number PB90-272709CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
   Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
   Emergency and Remedial Response.; Drug Enforcement
  Administration, Washington, DC.**Coast Guard, Washington,
  DC; Mar 90
  The document provides guidelines  proposed by the Joint
  Task Force on illegal/clandestine  drug laboratories to assist
  State and local law enforcement and health agencies devel-
  op a framework for cleaning up clandestine drug laboratories.
  The  guidelines contain  an overview of recommended en-
  forcement  procedures,  as well as safety  guidelines  and
  cleanup strategies.
  Specifications:  Prepared in cooperation with Drug Enforce-
  ment  Administration,  Washington, DC.,  and Coast Guard,
  Washington, DC. 46p.
  Subject index keywords: Chemical laboratories, Drug indus-
  try,  Drugs, Manufacturing,  Toxic  substances, Occupational
  safety and health.                                   ;

1008  Policy on Management of Post-Removal Site Control
  Order Number PB91-921326CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Emergency and Remedial Response;  3 Dec 90
  The directive transmits the OSWER  policy on management
  of post-removal site control for Fund-financed  removal activi-
  ties and communicating decisions to States on the use of in-
  stitutional controls.  It provides  procedures to ensure that,
  when necessary and to the extent practicable, provision for
  post-removal site control at both National Priorities List (NPL)
  and non-NPL  sites  is made prior to initiation of a  Fund-fi-
  nanced removal action.  Procedures are also provided for
  communicating decisions to States on the use of institutional
  controls  when waste is left on-site following  a  removal
  action.
  Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
  posit account required (minimum deposit $150 U.S., Canada,
  and Mexico; all others $300). Single copies also available  in
  paper copy or microfiche. 16p.
                                                                                                             187

-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Removal Program
Management
  Subject Index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
  Hazardous materials, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
  Response.
1009  Removal Cost Management System: Version 3.2
  Order Number PB90-272691CDH, price: PC A10/MF A02
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Emergency and Remedial Response; May 90
  The user's guide for the Removal Cost Management System
  (RCMS) is specifically designed to serve  as a  reference
  manual for software used to perform cost projections and
  daily cost  tracking. The guide can also  be used  to create
  Cost Projection reports,  the  1900-55  Form, a Daily  Cost
  Summary, an Incident Obligation Log, and Site Summary Re-
  ports.
  Specifications:  Also available from Supt. of Docs. See also
  PB90-153891.211p.
  Subject Index keywords: Guidelines, Hazardous  materials,
  Superfund,  Waste  management,  User  manuals(Computer
  programs).
1010  Removal Program Representative Sampling
  Guidance. Volume 1. Soil
  Order Number PB92-963408CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Emergency and Remedial Response; Nov 91
  This Is the first volume in a series of guidance documents
  that  assist Removal  Program On-Scene Coordinators and
  other field staff in obtaining  representative samples at re-
  moval sites. The objective of representative sampling is to
  ensure that a sample or a group of samples accurately char-
  acterizes site conditions. The document specifically address-
  es representative sampling for soil.
  Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
  posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
  and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
  paper copy or microfiche. 56p.
  Subject index keywords:  Hazardous materials, Soils, Re-
  moval,  Superfund, Representative sampling.

1011   Site-Specific Contracting for Removals
  Order Number PB91-215053CDH, price: PC  A02/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 10 Apr 89
  The  directive  provides direction on  the use of site-specific
  contracting in as many removal actions as circumstances
  allow and lists the criteria needed to do so.
  Specifications: 6p.
  Subject Index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
  Hazardous materials, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
  Response.

1012  Superfund Removal Procedures: Action
  Memorandum Guidance
  Order Number PB9Q-274473CDH, price: PC  A04/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 90
  The directive provides  guidance  for Action Memorandum,
  which are concise written records  of the decisions selecting
  removal actions,  arid the  primary  decision  documents to
  select and authorize such actions. The document is the first
  volume of a ten-volume series of guidance documents col-
  lectively titled the  'Superfund  Removal Procedures.' These
  stand-alone volumes update and  replace OSWER Directive
  9360.0-3B, the single-volume 'Superfund  Removal  Proce-
  dures' manual issued in February 1988.
  Specifications: 59p.
  Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Guidelines,
  Removal,  Superfund, Waste management, Office of Solid
  Waste and Emergency Response, Remedial response, Re-
  medial action.

1013  Superfund Removal Procedures: Guidance on the
  Consideration of ARARS during Removal Actions
  Order Number PB92-963401CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Emergency and Remedial Response; Aug 91
  The document  is part  of a ten-volume  series  of guidance
  documents collectively titled the Superfund Removal Proce-
  dures. The specific document presents  information  recom-
  mendations, and examples to aid On Scene Coordinators in
  identifying potential Federal and State ARARs, determining
  the extent to which compliance with ARARs is practicable,
  and documenting  ARAR evaluations. The guidance also may
  be used by potentially responsible parties  (PRPs) when  po-
  tential ARARs are being assembled by the PRP.
  Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
  posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
  and Mexico;  all others $400). Single copies also available in
  paper copy or microfiche. 39p.
  Subject index keywords:  Removal, Hazardous materials,
  Superfund.
1014  Superfund Removal Procedures: Public Participation
  Guidance for On-Scene Coordinators: Community
  Relations and the Administrative Record
  Order Number PB92-963416CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Emergency and Remedial Response; Jul 92
  The document is  part of a ten-volume  series of guidance
  documents collectively titled the Superfund Removal Proce-
  dures. Each volume in the series is dedicated to a particular
  aspect of the removal process. The document summarizes
  the relevant  public participation guidance  and  statutory au-
  thorities for conducting community relations and administra-
  tive record activities.
  Specifications: Available  on Standing  Order, deposit  ac-
  count required (minimum deposit  $200  U.S., Canada, and
  Mexico;  all  others $400). Single  copies  also available in
  paper copy or microfiche. Supersedes PB90-192055. 43p.
  Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials,  Removal,
  Pollution control, Superfund.
1015  Superfund Removal Procedures: Removal
  Enforcement Guidance for On-Scene Coordinators
  Order Number PB92-9634fJ9CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Emergency and Remedial Response; Apr 92
  The  document is part of  a ten-volume series of guidance
  documents collectively titled the Superfund Removal Proce-
  dures.  These  stand-alone  volumes update  and  replace
  OSWER Directive 9360.0-3B, the single-volume Superfund
  Removal Procedures manual, issued in February 1988. Each
  volume in the series is dedicated to a particular  aspect of the
  removal process and  includes  a volume-specific Table of
  Contents, Reference List, and Key Words Index.  The series
  comprises the following nine procedural volumes. The docu-
 188

-------
                                                               PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Risk Management
  ment summarizes the relevant guidance and statutory au-
  thorities for conducting enforcement activities during removal
  actions.
  Specifications: Available on  Standing  Order, deposit ac-
  count required (minimum deposit $200  U.S., Canada, and
  Mexico; all others $400).  Single copies also available in
  paper copy or microfiche. See also PB90-192055. 41 p.
  Subject index keywords: Hazardous  materials, Removal,
  Pollution control, Superfund.

1016   Use of Office of Research and Development's
  Bioremediation Expertise in Superfund Removal
  Program
  Order Number PB90-249798CDH, price: PC A01/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Emergency and Remedial Response; 12 Mar 90
  The directive establishes a formal mechanism for accessing
  and using the Office of Research and Development's (ORD)
  capabilities in the area of bioremediation of oil spills, hazard-
  ous substance spills, and Superfund removal  actions.
  Specifications:  5p.
  Subject index keywords: Regulations, Hazardous materials,
  Microorganisms, Superfund, Oil spills,  Remedial action, Bior-
  emediation, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response.


PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Risk

Management

1017  Achieving Greater Consistency between Subjective
  and Objective Risks
  Order Number PB90-229832CDH, price: PC A07/MF A01
  Pennsylvania State Univ., University Park. Environmental
  Resources  Research Inst.; Environmental Protection Agency,
  Washington, DC. Office of Policy, Planning and Evaluation;
  Nov 89
  In the context  of  a hypothetical Superfund site (or aban-
  doned hazardous waste facility), the research examines strat-
  egies for achieving a closer match between risk estimates by
  citizens and those  by scientists. A stratefied sample was
  interviewed to  represent environmental  groups,  business,
  civic activists, elected officials,  and general  population.  Re-
  spondents  were given  a scenario about  contamination of
  drinking water from the Superfund site. The scenarios varied
  in that some included an uncertainty disclaimer.  The other
  variation was  in terms  of how much citizen participation
  would  be  involved in decisions about remedial  action, or
  whether the state would purchase homes that could not be
  sold at a price representing market value before discovery of
  the site. Respondents were asked about their level of con-
  cern, their perceived risk, and any actions they would take if
  they lived near the hypothetical site.
  Specifications:   Sponsored by  Environmental  Protection
  Agency, Washington, DC. Office of Policy, Planning and Eval-
  uation. 128p.
  Subject index keywords: Risk, Water pollution, Hazardous
  materials, Superfund program.
 1018  ATSDR Health Consultations under CERCLA
  Order Number PB93-963334CDH, price: PC A01/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 21 Nov 91
  The memorandum clarifies issues related to Agency for Toxic
  Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR) health  consulta-
  tions requested under CERCLA by the Superfund removal,
  remedial, and site assessment programs.
  Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
  posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
  and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also  available in
  paper copy or microfiche. 3p.
  Subject index keywords: Superfund,  Hazardous materials,
  Waste disposal, Risk assessment.

 1019  ECO Update: Ecological Assessment of Superfund
  Sites. An Overview. Volume 1, Number 2, December 1991
  Order Number PB92-963335CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Emergency and Remedial Response; Dec 91
  The document is an  updated framework for  ecological as-
  sessment in the Superfund Program. It offers a description of
  ecological assessment components and a discussion of how
  they fit into the Remedial Investigation and Feasibility Study
  process. ECO Updates are  a series of Intermittent Bulletins
  intended to facilitate ecological  assessment of Superfund
  sites. Individual bulletins may discuss either technical meth-
  ods or the  management of ecological assessments. These
  bulletins serve as supplements to Risk Assessment Guid-
  ance for Superfund  Volume 2:  Environmental  Evaluation
  Manual (9285.7-01).
  Specifications: Please type  43B  message. See also PB90-
  155599. 10p.
  Subject index keywords: Sites, Hazardous materials, Ecolo-
  gy, Pollution control, Superfund.

1020  ECO Update: The Role  of BTAGs in Ecological
  Assessment. Volume 1, Number 1, September 1991
  Order Number PB92-963337CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 91
  Most EPA Regions have established groups of scientists to
  advise and assist site managers with ecological studies pro-
  duced in conjunction with Remedial Investigations  and Feasi-
  bility Studies and Removal  Actions at Superfund sites. In
  general, these groups  are known as Biological Technical As-
  sistance Groups or BTAGs,  although some regions use dif-
  ferent names.  The bulletin summarizes the STAG structure
  and function in the Superfund process. Its purpose is to help
  site managers understand how BTAGs can assist with the
  collection and  evaluation of site information and ensure that
  ecological effects are properly considered. ECO Updates are
  a series of Intermittent Bulletins intended to facilitate ecologi-
  cal assessment of Superfund sites. These bulletins serve as
  supplements to Risk  Assessment  Guidance for  Superfund
  Volume 2: Environmental Evaluation Manual (9285.7-01).
  Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing  Order, de-
  posit account required (minimum deposit $200  U.S., Canada,
  and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
  paper copy or microfiche. See also PB90-155599. 6p.
                                                                                                            189

-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Risk Management
  Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Sites, Ecolo-
  gy, Pollution control, Superfund, Biological Technical Assist-
  ance Groups.
1021  ECO Update. Volume 1, Number 3. The Role of
  Natural Resource Trustees  In the Superfund Process
  Order Number PB92-963369CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Emergency and Remedial Response; Mar 92
  The bulletin |s intended to help Remedial Project Managers
  and dn-Scene Coordinators work with natural resource trust-
  ees during site assessment and remediation. It explains  the
  authority and responsibilities  of trustees, and the  responsibil-
  ities of RPMs and OSCs with respect to  trustee issues. The
  goal  of this document is to  help reduce delays and ensure
  compliance with relevant statutes by increasing understand-
  ing of trustee issues  as they pertain to  the Superfund pro-
  gram.
  Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order,  de-
  posit account required (minimum deposit  $200 U.S., Canada,
  and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also  available in
  paper copy or microfiche. See also PB92-963370. 12p.
  Subject Index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
  Hazardous  materials,  Remedial  action, Natural  resource
  trustees, Cleanup operations.
1022  ECO Update. Volume 1, Number 4. Developing a
  Work Scope for Ecological Assessments
  Order Number PB92-963370CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Emergency and Remedial Response; May 92
  The  bulletin  is  intended for Remedial  Project Managers
  (RPMs), to help them plan and manage ecological assess-
  ments of sites as part of the  Remedial Investigation and Fea-
  sibility  Study (RI/FS) process. As used here,  the generic
  term work scope describes the process of specifying  the
  work to be done for  the ecological assessment, as part of
  the overall Rl Work  Plan.  The term encompasses project
  scoping, development and approval of the Work Plan, and
  preparation of the Statement of Work (SOW) for contractors
  (at Fund-lead sites). The outcome of a successfully executed
  work scope should  be an  ecological assessment that in-
  cludes  four essential  components: problem formulation,  ex-
  posure assessment, ecological effects assessment, and  risk
  characterization.
  Specifications: Paper copy available on  Standing Order, de-
  posit account required (minimum deposit  $200 U.S., Canada,
  and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
  paper copy or microfiche. See also PB92-963369. 16p.
  Subject Index keywords:  Superfund, Waste management,
  Hazardous materials,  Remedial action, Ecology, Cleanup op-
  erations, Work scope.
1023   ECO Update. Volume 1, Number 5, August 1992.
  Briefing the BTAG: Initial Description of Setting, History,
  and Ecology of a Site
  Order Number PB92-963374CDH,  price: PC A03/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC.  Office of
  Emergency and Remedial Response; Aug 92
  The  ECO  Update is a bulletin series on ecological assess-
  ment of Superfund sites. The issue highlights the  Biological
  Technical  Assistance Groups (BTAGs) that assist  Remedial
  Project Managers in managing assessments of whether eco-
  logical  harm has occurred or may occur  at a Superfund site.
  Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
  posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
  and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
  paper copy or microfiche. 11 p.
  Subject index keywords: Ecology, Hazardous materials, As-
  sessments.

1024  Ecological Risk Assessment Methods: A Review and
  Evaluation of Past Practices in the Superfund and RCRA
  (Resource Conservation and Recovery Act) Programs
  (Executive Summary Included)
  Order Number PB90-137324CDH, price: PC A10/MF A02
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Policy, Planning and Evaluation; Jun 89
  Substances released from sites subject to  the Comprehen-
  sive  Environmental Response, Compensation, and  Liability
  Act and the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act have
  the potential to cause adverse effects to human  health and
  the environment. Although there are numerous examples of
  adverse ecological impacts being caused by releases of haz-
  ardous  substances and wastes, programs have focused pri-
  marily on identification, analysis, and mitigation of potential
  adverse effects to human  health. As  a consequence of the
  program emphasis, relatively little  information  is available
  concerning the overall extent of ecological  impacts at sites.
  EPA/OPA initiated a study of the nature and extent of eco-
  logical impacts at CERCLA and RCRA sites re. the methods
  that have been or could be used to evaluate ecological im-
  pacts at these sites,  and  past ecological  risk management
  decisions and issues at OSWER waste sites.
  Specifications:  21 Op.
  Subject index  keywords:  Hazardous  materials,  Ecology,
  Public health.

1025   Ecological Risk Management in the Superfund and
  RCRA (Resource Conservation and  Recovery Act)
  Programs
  Order Number PB90-137332CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Policy, Planning and Evaluation; Jun 89
  The report discusses the extent to which ecological concerns
  have been used  as  a  basis for  decisionmaking  in the
  CERCLA and RCRA programs. For each program, the report
  first  identifies areas in which  ecological impacts could be
  considered, and then examines the  manner and extent to
  which ecological concerns have, in fact, been taken into ac-
  count in program activities. The report concludes with discus-
  sion of the major ecological risk management  issues that
  should  be addressed by  the Agency if  ecological concerns
  are to  be fully considered in the RCRA/CERCLA decision-
  making.
  Specifications:  45p.
  Subject index keywords: Ecology, Hazardous materials.

1026  Effect of OSHA's Bloodborne Pathogens Standard
  on Hazardous Waste Cleanup Activities
  Order Number PB93-963419CDH, price:  PC A02/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Aug 93
  Bloodborne pathogens are microorganisms that are present
  in human blood and  can  cause disease in humans. These
  pathogens include, but are not limited  to,  hepatitis B virus
  (HBV) and  human immunodeficiency  virus (HIV). In addition
 190

-------
                                                               PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Risk Management
  to healthcare workers, the standard also may affect workers
  who handle waste  potentially  contaminated with blood or
  other potentially infectious  material  during response actions
  at uncontrolled hazardous  waste sites. The  purpose of the
  Fact Sheet is to describe  the  additional planning, training,
  and  medical surveillance requirements that the new OSHA
  standard on bloodborne pathogens imposes upon On-Scene
  Coordinators   (OSCs)  and  Remedial  Project  Managers
  (RPMs) during a Superfund  response action.
  Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
  posit account required (minimum deposit $225 U.S., Canada,
  and Mexico; all others $450). Single copies also available in
  paper copy or microfiche. 7p.
  Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Occupation-
  al exposure, Medical wastes, Superfund.

1027   Environmental Asbestos Assessment Manual.
  Superfund Method for the Determination of Asbestos in
  Ambient Air. Part 1. Method
  Order Number PB90-274283CDH, price: PC A06/MF A01
  Environmental  Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Emergency and Remedial Response; May 90
  The report provides a sampling  and analysis  method for the
  determination  of asbestos in the air to provide results suita-
  ble for supporting risk assessments at Superfund sites. Part
  2 presents the technical background and considerations ad-
  dressed during the development of the  method.
  Specifications: See also Part 2, PB90-274291.  121 p.
  Subject index keywords:  Asbestos,  Hazardous materials,
  Air pollution, Superfund.

1028  Environmental Asbestos Assessment Manual.
  Superfund Method for the Determination of Asbestos in
  Ambient Air. Part 2. Technical  Background Document
  Order Number  PB90-274291CDH, price: PC A06/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Emergency and Remedial Response; May 90
  The report provides a sampling  and analysis method for the
  determination  of asbestos in the air to provide results suita-
  ble for supporting risk assessments at Superfund sites. Part
  1  presents the  method to be used.
.  Specifications: See also Part 1, PB90-274283. 106p.
  Subject index  keywords:  Asbestos,  Hazardous materials,
  Chemical analysis, Air pollution, Superfund.

1029  Guidance for Coordinating ATSDR Health
  Assessment Activities with the Superfund Remedial
  Process
  Order Number PB91-214080CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Emergency and Remedial Response; 22 Apr 87
  The directive  discusses  SARA  which mandates  that the
  Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR)
  perform  specific public  health  activities  associated  with
  actual or potential exposure to toxic substances identified at
  hazardous waste sites. The  document (1) provides guidance
  to support ATSDR in meeting  its health assessment require-
  ments as outlined in Section  110 under SARA; (2) summa-
  rizes the various EPA response activities for which consulta-
  tion  with ATSDR  may  be  requested; and (3)   outlines
,  ATSDR's management process for citizen petitions.
  Specifications:  24p.
   Subject  index keywords: Superfund,  Waste management,
   Hazardous materials, Toxic substances, Public health, Office
   of Solid Waste and Emergency Response.

 1030  Guidance for Data Useability in Risk Assessment
   Order Number PB91-921312CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
   Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  • Emergency and Remedial Response;  Sep 90
   EPA is establishing national guidance for minimum data qual-
   ity requirements to optimize the useability of data collected
 ' under the  Comprehensive Environmental  Response, Com-
   pensation, and Liability Act of 1980 (CERCLA). Data useabi-
   lity is the process of assuring or determining that the quality
   of data generated meets the intended use. The guidance is
  •designed to provide data users with a nationally-consistent
   basis for making decisions about the minimum quality and
   quantity of environmental analytical data that are sufficient to
   support  Superfund  decisions, regardless  of which  parties
   conduct the investigation. EPA  workgroups are defining the
   current uses and associated  quality requirements of Super-
   fund data,  and developing minimum  requirements for  each
   data use category. The fact sheet provides an overview of
   Guidance for Data Useability in Risk Assessment (ERA/540/
 . ; G-90/008), highlights key: points of the manual, and details
   where additional guidance is found.
   Specifications: Paper copy available  on Standing Order, de-
   posit account required (minimum deposit $150 U.S;, Canada,
   and Mexico; all others $300). Single copies also available in
   paper copy or microfiche. 8p.   .
   Subject index keywords: Public health, Hazardous  materi-
   als, Data  acquisition, Management planning, Superfund, Risk
 .  assessment.

"1031  Guidance for Data Useability in Risk Assessment
  Order Number PB92-963363CDH, price:  PC A02/MF A01
   Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
   Emergency and Remedial Response; Jun 92
  The fact sheet provides an overview of Part A and Part B of
  the Guidance for Data Useability in Risk Assessment.  It high-
  lights key points of  the documents and states where addi-
  tional  information  can be found. The  Guidance  for  Data
 , Useability in Risk Assessment provides risk assessors ,and
  RPMs with nationally-consistent procedures  to  plan  and
  assess sampling and analysis of useable environmental data
  for baseline human health risk assessments, and addresses
  the useability  of radioanalytical data for  baseline  human
  health risk assessment.
  Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
  posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
  and Mexico; all others $400).  Single copies also available in
  paper copy or microfiche. 8p.
  Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
  Hazardous materials, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
  Response.          "

1032  Guidance for Data Useability in Risk Assessment.
  Interim Report
  Order Number PB91-921208CDH, price: PC A12/MF A02
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Emergency and Remedial Response; Oct 90
  The Environmental  Protection Agency has  established a
  Data  Useability Workgroup to develop national guidance for
  minimum  data quality requirements to  increase the useability
                                                                                                              191

-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Risk Management
  of environmental analytical data in the cleanup of hazardous
  waste sites  under the Comprehensive Environmental Re-
  sponse,  Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980 as amend-
  ed in the Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization Act of
  1986  (SARA). The  guidance  manual  prvides direction  for
  planning and assessing analytical data collection activities for
  the baseline human health risk  assessment, conducted as
  part of the remedial investigation (Rl) process. The guidance
  does not address the use of environmental data for purposes
  other than baseline risk asssessment for human health.
  Specifications: Paper  copy available on Standing Order, de-
  posit account required  (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
  and Mexico;  all others  $400). Single  copies also available in
  paper copy or microfiche. 272p.
  Subject  index  keywords:  Hazardous  materials,  Public
  health, Data acquisition, Management  planning, Superfund,
  Risk assessment.

1033  Guidance for Data Useability in Risk Assessment
  (Part A)
  Order Number PB92-963356CDH, price: PC A13/MF A03
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Emergency and Remedial  Response; Apr 92
  The document is the first part (Part A)  of the two-part Guid-
  ance for Data Useability in  Risk Assessment. The guidance
  provides direction  for planning and assessing analytical data
  collection activities for the  baseline human health  risk  as-
  sessment, conducted  as  part of the remedial investigation
  (Rl) process. It provides risk assesors and RPMs with nation-
  ally-consistent procedures to plan and  assess sampling and
  analysis of  useable  environmental data. Although the guid-
  ance addresses the baseline assessment within the Rl, it is
  apprdpriate for use In the  new Superfund Accelerated Clean-
  up Model where data needs for risk assessment are consid-
  ered at the onset of site evaluation.
  Specifications: Paper  copy available on Standing Order,  de-
  posit account required  (minimum deposit $200  U.S., Canada,
  and Mexico;  all others $400). Single copies also available in
  paper copy  or microfiche.  Supersedes PB91-921208. See
  also PB92-963362, 290p.
  Subject Index keywords: Superfund, Risk assessment, Haz-
  ardous materials, Waste management, Public health.
1034  Guidance for Data Useability in Risk Assessment
  (PartB)
  Order Number PB92-963362CDH, price: PC A05/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Emergency and Remedial Response; May 92
  Part B of Guidance for Data Useability in Risk Assessment
  provides supplemental information regarding the useability of
  analytical data for performing  a baseline risk assessment at
  sites with radioactivity. While Part A  focuses primarily on
  chemical contamination, much of the information presented
  also applies to the risk assessment process for radioactive
  contamination. The guidance offered in Part B is intended as
  an overview  of the key differences between chemical and ra-
  dionuclide risk  assessments, and not  as  a comprehensive,
  stand-alone document to assess the risks  posed by radionu-
  clide exposures. Part A of the guidance should be used side
  by side with this document.
  Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
  posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
  and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
  paper copy or microfiche. Supersedes  PB91-921208. See
  also PB92-963356. 85p.
  Subject index  keywords:  Risk assessment,  Radioactive
  materials, Public health.

1035  Health Effects Assessment for Benzene
  Order Number PB90-142381CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH.
  Environmental Criteria and Assessment Office; Aug 89
  The report summarizes and evaluates information relevant to
  a preliminary interim assessment of adverse health effects
  associated with specific chemicals or compounds. The Office
  of Emergency  and  Remedial Response (Superfund)  uses
  these documents  in preparing  cost-benefit analyses under
  Executive Order 12991  for decision-making under CERCLA.
  All estimates of acceptable intakes and carcinogenic potency
  presented in the document should be  considered as prelimi-
  nary  and reflect limited  resources allocated to  the  project.
  The intent in the assessments is to suggest acceptable ex-
  posure levels whenever sufficient data are available. The in-
  terim values presented  reflect the relative degree of hazard
  associated  with exposure or risk  to the  chemical(s) ad-
  dressed. Whenever possible, two categories of values have
  been  estimated for  systemic toxicants (toxicants for which
  cancer is not the  endpoint  of concern).  The first, RfDS or
  subchronic  reference dose,  is an estimate of an exposure
  level that would not be expected to cause adverse effects
  when exposure occurs during a limited time interval. The RfD
  is an estimate of an exposure level that would not be expect-
  ed to cause adverse effects  when exposure occurs for a sig-
  nificant portion of the lifespan.
  Specifications:  67p.
  Subject index keywords: Benzenes, Hazardous materials,
  Industrial hygiene,  Toxicology, Environmental surveys, Occu-
  pational safety and health, Toxic substances, Environmental
  health.

1036   Health Effects  Assessment for Cadmium
  Order Number PB90-142399CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH.
  Environmental Criteria and Assessment Office.; Syracuse
  Research Corp., NY; Aug 88
  The report summarizes  and evaluates  information relevant to
  a preliminary interim assessment of adverse health effects
  associated with specific chemicals or compounds. The Office
  of Emergency and  Remedial Response  (Superfund)  uses
  these documents  in preparing  cost-benefit  analyses under
  Executive Order 12991 for decision-making under CERCLA.
  All estimates of acceptable intakes and carcinogenic potency
  presented in the document should be considered as prelimi-
  nary and reflect limited resources allocated to the project.
  The  intent in the assessments is to suggest acceptable ex-
  posure levels whenever sufficient data are available. The in-
  terim values presented reflect the relative degree of hazard
  associated  with exposure or risk  to the  chemical(s) ad-
  dressed. Whenever  possible, two categories of values have
  been estimated for  systemic toxicants (toxicants for which
  cancer is not the endpoint  of concern).  The first, RfDS or
  subchronic  reference dose,  is an estimate of an exposure
  level that would not be expected to  cause  adverse effects
  when exposure occurs during a limited time interval. The RfD
  is an estimate of an  exposure level that would not be expect-
192

-------
                                                                PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Risk Management
  ed to cause adverse effects when exposure occurs for a sig-
  nificant portion of the lifespan.
  Specifications: Prepared  in cooperation with Syracuse Re-
  search Corp., NY. 60p.
  Subject index  keywords:  Cadmium,  Hazardous materials,
  Industrial hygiene, Toxicology, Environmental  surveys, Occu-
  pational safety and health, Toxic substances, Environmental
  health.

1037   Health Effects Assessment for Carbon Tetrachloride
  Order Number PB90-142407CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH.
  Environmental Criteria and Assessment Office.; Syracuse
  Research Corp., NY; Aug 89
  The report summarizes and evaluates information relevant to
  a preliminary interim  assessment of adverse health effects
  associated with specific chemicals or compounds. The Office
  of Emergency and  Remedial  Response  (Superfund)  uses
  these documents  in  preparing cost-benefit analyses under
  Executive Order 12991  for decision-making under CERCLA.
  All estimates of acceptable intakes and carcinogenic potency
  presented in the document should be considered as prelimi-
  nary and reflect limited resources allocated  to the project.
  The intent in  the assessments is to  suggest  acceptable ex-
  posure levels whenever sufficient data  are available. The in-
  terim values presented reflect the relative degree of hazard
  associated  with exposure or  risk  to  the chemical(s) ad-
  dressed. Whenever possible, two categories of  values have
  been estimated for systemic  toxicants (toxicants for which
  cancer is not the endpoint of concern).  The first, RfDS  or
  subchronic  reference dose, is an  estimate of an exposure
  level that would not be expected to cause adverse effects
  when exposure occurs during a limited time interval. The RfD
  is an estimate of an exposure level that would  not be expect-
  ed to cause adverse effects when exposure occurs for a sig-
  nificant portion of the  lifespan.
  Specifications:  Prepared in cooperation with Syracuse Re-
  search Corp., NY. 54p.
  Subject index keywords: Carbon tetrachloride, Hazardous
  materials, Industrial hygiene, Toxicology,  Environmental sur-
  veys, Occupational safety and health, Toxic substances, En-
  vironmental health.

1038  Health Effects Assessment for Chlordane
  Order Number PB90-142415CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH.
  Environmental Criteria and Assessment Office.; Syracuse
  Research Corp., NY; Jul 88
  The report summarizes and evaluates information relevant  to
  a preliminary  interim  assessment of adverse  health effects
  associated with specific chemicals or compounds. The Office
  of Emergency and Remedial  Response  (Superfund)  uses
  these documents in  preparing cost-benefit analyses under
  Executive Order 12991 for decision-making under CERCLA.
  All estimates of acceptable intakes and carcinogenic potency
  presented in the document should be considered as prelimi-
  nary  and reflect limited resources allocated to  the project.
  The intent in the assessments is to suggest acceptable ex-
  posure levels whenever sufficient data are available. The in-
  terim values presented reflect the relative degree of hazard
  associated  with exposure  or  risk  to  the chemical(s) ad-
  dressed. Whenever possible, two categories of  values have
  been estimated  for systemic toxicants (toxicants  for which
  cancer is not the endpoint  of  concern).  The  first, RfDS  or
  subchronic reference dose, is an estimate of an  exposure
  level that would not be expected to cause adverse effects
  when exposure occurs during a limited time interval. The RfD
  is an estimate of an exposure level that would not be expect-
  ed to cause adverse effects when exposure occurs for a sig-
  nificant portion of the lifespan.
  Specifications:  Prepared in cooperation with Syracuse Re-
  search Corp., NY. 44p.
  Subject: index  keywords: Chlordane,  Hazardous materials,
  Industrial hygiene, Toxicology, Environmental  surveys, Occu-
  pational  safety and health, Toxic substances, Environmental
  health.

1039   Health Effects Assessment for Chlorobenzene
  Order Number  PB90-142514CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
  Environmental  Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH.
  Environmental Criteria and Assessment Office.; Syracuse
  Research Corp., NY; Jan 89
  The report summarizes  and evaluates information relevant to
  a preliminary interim assessment of adverse health effects
  associated with specific chemicals or compounds. The Office
  of  Emergency   and Remedial  Response  (Superfund) uses
  these documents in preparing cost-benefit analyses  under
  Executive Order 12991  for decision-making under CERCLA.
  All estimates of acceptable intakes and carcinogenic potency
  presented in the document should be considered as prelimi-
  nary and reflect limited resources allocated  to the project.
  The intent in the assessments is to suggest  acceptable ex-
  posure levels whenever sufficient data are available. The in-
  terim values presented  reflect the relative degree of hazard
  associated  with exposure or  risk  to  the chemical(s) ad-
  dressed. Whenever possible, two categories of  values have
  been estimated for systemic toxicants (toxicants for which
  cancer is not the endpoint of  concern).  The first, RfDS  or
  subchronic  reference dose, is  an estimate of an  exposure
  level that would not be expected to cause adverse effects
  when exposure occurs during a limited time interval. The RfD
  is an estimate of an exposure level that would  not be expect-
  ed to cause adverse effects when exposure occurs for a sig-
  nificant portion  of the lifespan.
  Specifications:  Prepared in cooperation with Syracuse Re-
  search Corp., NY. 47p.
  Subject  index keywords: Chlorobenzenes, Hazardous ma-
  terials, Industrial hygiene, Toxicology, Environmental surveys,
  Occupational safety and health, Toxic  substances, Environ-
  mental health.

1040  Health Effects Assessment for Chloroform
  Order Number PB90-142423CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH.
  Environmental Criteria and Assessment Office.; Syracuse
  Research Corp., NY; Apr 88
  The report summarizes and evaluates information relevant to
  a preliminary interim assessment of adverse  health effects
  associated with  specific chemicals or compounds. The Office
  of  Emergency  and Remedial  Response  (Superfund) uses
  these documents in preparing cost-benefit analyses under
  Executive Order 12991  for decision-making under CERCLA.
  All estimates of acceptable intakes and  carcinogenic potency
  presented in the document should be considered as prelimi-
  nary  and reflect limited resources allocated to  the project.
  The intent in the assessments  is to suggest acceptable ex-
  posure levels whenever sufficient data are available. The in-
                                                                                                                193

-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Risk Management
  terim values presented reflect the relative degree of hazard
  associated  with  exposure or risk to the chemical(s)  ad-
  dressed. Whenever possible, two categories of values have
  been estimated for systemic toxicants (toxicants for which
  cancer is not the endpoint of concern).  The first, RfDS or
  subchrpnic  reference dose, is an estimate of an exposure
  level that would  not be expected to  cause adverse effects
  when exposure occurs during a limited time interval. The RfD
  Is an estimate of an exposure level that would not be expect-
  ed to cause adverse effects when exposure occurs for a  sig-
  nificant portion of the lifespan.
  Specifications:   Prepared in cooperation with Syracuse  Re-
  search Corp., NY. 48p.
  Subject index keywords: Chloroform, Hazardous materials,
  Industrial hygiene, Toxicology, Environmental surveys, Occu-
  pational safety and health, Toxic substances, Environmental
  health,

1041  Health Effects Assessment for  DDT
  Order Number PB90-142431CDH, price: PC A04/MF  A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH.
  Environmental Criteria and Assessment Office.; Syracuse
  Research Corp., NY; Nov 88
  The report summarizes and evaluates  information relevant to
  a preliminary interim assessment of adverse health effects
  associated with specific chemicals or compounds. The Office
  of Emergency and Remedial Response  (Superfund) uses
  these documents in preparing cost-benefit analyses under
  Executive Order  12991 for decision-making under CERCLA.
  All estimates of acceptable intakes and carcinogenic potency
  presented In the document should be considered as prelimi-
  nary and reflect limited resources allocated  to  the project.
  The intent in the assessments is to suggest  acceptable ex-
  posure levels whenever sufficient data are available. The in-
  terim values presented reflect the relative degree of hazard
  associated  with  exposure or risk to the chemical(s)  ad-
  dressed. Whenever possible, two categories of values have
  been estimated for systemic toxicants (toxicants for which
  cancer is not the endpoint of concern).  The first, RfDS or
  subchfonic  reference dose, is an estimate of an exposure
  level that would  not be expected to  cause adverse effects
  when exposure occurs during a limited time interval. The RfD
  is an estimate of an exposure level that would not be expect-
  ed to cause adverse effects when exposure occurs for a  sig-
  nificant portion of the lifespan.
  Specifications:   Prepared in cooperation with Syracuse  Re-
  search Corp., NY. 58p.
  Subject index keywords: DDT,  Hazardous materials, Indus-
  trial hygiene, Toxicology, Environmental surveys, Occupation-
  al safety and health, Toxic substances, Environmental health.
1042  Health Effects Assessment for  Methyl Ethyl Ketone
  Order Number PB90-142456CDH, price: PC A03/MF  A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH.
  Environmental Criteria and Assessment Office.; Syracuse
  Research Corp., NY; Feb 89
  The report summarizes and evaluates  information relevant to
  a preliminary interim  assessment of  adverse health effects
  associated with specific chemicals or compounds. The Office
  of Emergency and  Remedial Response  (Superfund) uses
  these documents in  preparing cost-benefit analyses under
  Executive Order  12991 for decision-making under CERCLA.
  All estimates of acceptable intakes and carcinogenic potency
  presented in the document should be considered as prelimi-
  nary and reflect  limited resources allocated to the project.
  The intent in the assessments is to suggest acceptable ex-
  posure levels whenever sufficient data are available. The in-
  terim values presented reflect the relative degree of hazard
  associated  with  exposure or risk  to  the chemical(s)  ad-
  dressed. Whenever possible, two categories of values have
  been estimated for systemic toxicants (toxicants for which
  cancer is not the endpoint  of concern).  The first, RfDS or
  subchronic  reference dose,  is an estimate of an exposure
  level that would  not be expected to cause adverse effects
  when exposure occurs during a limited time interval. The RfD
  is an estimate of  an exposure level that would not be expect-
  ed to cause adverse effects  when exposure occurs for a sig-
  nificant portion of the lifespan.
  Specifications:  Prepared in cooperation with Syracuse Re-
  search Corp., NY. 31 p.
  Subject index keywords: Methyl ethyl  ketone,  Hazardous
  materials, Industrial hygiene, Toxicology,  Environmental sur-
  veys, Occupational safety and health, Toxic substances,  En-
  vironmental health.

1043   Health Effects Assessment for Methylene Chloride
  Order Number PB90-142449CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH.
  Environmental Criteria and Assessment Office.; Syracuse
  Research Corp., NY; Aug 89
  The report summarizes and evaluates information relevant to
  a preliminary interim assessment of adverse health effects
  associated with specific chemicals or compounds. The Office
  of Emergency and  Remedial Response (Superfund)  uses
  these documents in preparing  cost-benefit analyses under
  Executive Order  12991  for decision-making under CERCLA.
  All estimates of acceptable intakes and carcinogenic potency
  presented in the  document should be  considered as prelimi-
  nary and reflect  limited resources allocated to the project.
  The intent in the assessments is to suggest acceptable ex-
  posure levels whenever sufficient data are available. The in-
  terim values presented reflect the relative degree of hazard
  associated  with  exposure or risk  to  the chemical(s)  ad-
  dressed. Whenever possible, two categories of values have
  been estimated for  systemic toxicants (toxicants for which
  cancer is not the endpoint  of concern).  The first, RfDS or
  subchronic  reference dose,  is an estimate of an exposure
  level that would  not be expected to cause adverse effects
  when exposure occurs during a limited time interval. The RfD
  is an estimate of  an exposure level that would not be expect-
  ed to cause adverse effects  when exposure occurs for a sig-
  nificant portion of the lifespan.
  Specifications:  Prepared in cooperation with Syracuse  Re-
  search Corp., NY. 73p.
  Subject index keywords: Chloromethanes, Hazardous ma-
  terials, Industrial  hygiene, Toxicology, Environmental surveys,
  Occupational safety  and health, Toxic substances, Environ-
  mental health.

1044   Health Effects Assessment for Naphthalene
  Order Number PB90-142464CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH.
  Environmental Criteria and Assessment Office.; Syracuse
  Research Corp., NY; May 88
  The report summarizes and evaluates information relevant to
  a preliminary  interim assessment of adverse health effects
  associated with specific chemicals or compounds. The Office
194

-------
                                                                PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Risk Management
  of Emergency  and Remedial  Response (Superfund)  uses
  these documents in preparing cost-benefit analyses under
  Executive Order 12991 for decision-making under CERCLA.
  All estimates of acceptable intakes and carcinogenic potency
  presented in the document should be considered as prelimi-
  nary and  reflect limited resources  allocated to  the  project.
  The intent in the assessments is to suggest acceptable ex-
  posure levels whenever sufficient data are available. The in-
  terim values presented reflect the relative degree of hazard
  associated with exposure or  risk  to the  chemical(s) ad-
  dressed.  Whenever possible, two categories of values  have
  been estimated for systemic toxicants  (toxicants for which
  cancer is not the endpoint of  concern). The first, RfDS or
  subchronic reference dose, is  an estimate  of an exposure
  level that would not be expected to cause adverse effects
  when exposure occurs during a limited time interval. The RfD
  is an estimate of an exposure level that would not be expect-
  ed to cause adverse effects when exposure occurs for a sig-
  nificant portion of the lifespan.
  Specifications: Prepared in cooperation with Syracuse Re-
  search Corp., NY. 35p.
  Subject index keywords: Naphthalene, Hazardous materi-
  als, Industrial hygiene, Toxicology, Environmental  surveys,
  Occupational safety and health, Toxic substances,  Environ-
  mental health.

1045  Health Effects Assessment for Phenol
  Order Number PB90-142472CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH.
  Environmental Criteria and Assessment Office.; Syracuse
  Research Corp., NY; Jul 89
  The report summarizes and evaluates information relevant to
  a preliminary interim assessment of adverse health  effects
  associated with specific chemicals or compounds. The Office
  of  Emergency  and  Remedial  Response  (Superfund)  uses
  these  documents  in preparing  cost-benefit  analyses under
  Executive Order 12991  for decision-making under CERCLA.
  All estimates of acceptable intakes and carcinogenic potency
  presented in the document should be considered as prelimi-
  nary and  reflect limited resources allocated  to the project.
  The intent in the assessments  is to suggest acceptable ex-
  posure levels whenever sufficient data are available. The in-
  terim values presented  reflect the relative degree of hazard
  associated  with exposure  or risk  to  the  chemical(s) ad-
  dressed. Whenever possible, two categories of values have
  been estimated  for  systemic toxicants (toxicants for which
  cancer is not  the  endpoint of concern).  The first, RfDS  or
  subchronic reference dose,  is an estimate of an exposure
  level that would not be expected to cause adverse effects
  when exposure occurs during a  limited time interval. The RfD
  is an estimate of an exposure level that would not be expect-
  ed to cause adverse effects when exposure occurs for a sig-
  nificant portion of the lifespan.
  Specifications:  Prepared in cooperation with Syracuse Re-
  search Corp., NY. 36p.
  Subject index keywords: Phenols,  Hazardous materials, In-
  dustrial hygiene, Toxicology, Environmental surveys, Occupa-
  tional safety and health, Toxic substances,  Environmental
  health.
1046  Health Effects Assessment for Styrene
  Order Number PB90-142357CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH.
  Environmental Criteria and Assessment Office; Aug 89
  The report summarizes  and evaluates information relevant to
  a  preliminary interim assessment  of  adverse health effects
  associated with specific chemicals or compounds. The Office
  of Emergency  and Remedial  Response (Superfund)  uses
  these documents in preparing cost-benefit analyses under
  Executive Order 12991  for decision-making under CERCLA.
  All estimates of acceptable intakes and carcinogenic potency
  presented in the document should be considered as prelimi-
  nary and  reflect limited resources allocated to  the  project.
  The intent in  the assessments is to  suggest acceptable ex-
  posure levels whenever sufficient data are available. The in-
  terim values presented  reflect the relative degree of hazard
  associated with exposure  or  risk to the  chemical(s) ad-
  dressed.  Whenever possible, two categories of values have
  been estimated for systemic toxicants  (toxicants for which
  cancer is not  the endpoint of  concern). The first, RfDS or
  subchronic reference dose, is  an estimate  of an exposure
  level that would not be expected to  cause adverse effects
  when exposure occurs during a limited time interval. The RfD
  is an estimate of an exposure level that would not be expect-
  ed to cause adverse effects when exposure occurs for a sig-
  nificant portion of the lifespan.
  Specifications: 70p.
  Subject index keywords: Styrene, Hazardous materials, In-
  dustrial hygiene, Toxicology, Environmental surveys, Occupa-
  tional  safety and health, Toxic substances, Environmental
  health.

1047  Health Effects Assessment for Tetrachloroethylene
  Order Number PB90-142480CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH.
  Environmental Criteria and Assessment Office.; Syracuse
  Research Corp., NY; Feb 88
  The report summarizes and evaluates information relevant to
  a preliminary  interim assessment of  adverse health  effects
  associated with specific  chemicals or  compounds. The Office
  of  Emergency and  Remedial  Response  (Superfund)  uses
  these  documents in preparing  cost-benefit  analyses under
  Executive Order 12991  for decision-making under CERCLA.
  All estimates of acceptable intakes and carcinogenic potency
  presented in the document should be considered as prelimi-
  nary and reflect limited resources allocated  to the project.
  The intent in the assessments  is to .suggest acceptable ex-
  posure levels whenever sufficient data are available. The in-
  terim values presented reflect the  relative degree of hazard
  associated  with  exposure or risk to the chemical(s) ad-
  dressed. Whenever possible, two categories of values have
  been estimated for  systemic toxicants (toxicants for which
  cancer is not the endpoint  of concern).  The first, RfDS or
  subchronic reference dose,  is an  estimate of an exposure
  level  that would not be expected to cause  adverse  effects
  when exposure occurs during a limited time interval. The RfD
  is an estimate of an exposure level that would not be expect-
  ed  to cause adverse effects when exposure occurs for a sig-
  nificant, portion of the lifespan.
  Specifications: Prepared in cooperation with Syracuse Re-
  search Corp., NY. 61 p.
  Subject  index  keywords: Tetrachloroethylene,  Hazardous
  materials, Industrial hygiene, Toxicology,  Environmental sur-
                                                                                                                195

-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Risk Management
  veys, Occupational safety and health, Toxic substances, En-
  vironmental health.
1048  Health Effects Assessment for Trichloroethylene
  Order Number PB90-142498CDH, price: PC A05/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH.
  Environmental Criteria and Assessment Office.; Syracuse
  Research Corp., NY; Feb 88
  The report summarizes and evaluates information relevant to
  a preliminary interim assessment of adverse health  effects
  associated with specific chemicals or compounds. The Office
  of Emergency and Remedial  Response  (Superfund)  uses
  these documents in preparing cost-benefit analyses under
  Executive Order  12991  for decision-making under CERCLA.
  All estimates of acceptable intakes and carcinogenic potency
  presented in the  document should be considered as  prelimi-
  nary and reflect  limited  resources allocated  to the  project.
  The intent in the assessments is to  suggest  acceptable ex-
  posure levels whenever sufficient data are available.  The in-
  terim values presented  reflect the relative degree of  hazard
  associated  with  exposure or  risk to the chemical(s) ad-
  dressed. Whenever possible, two categories  of values  have
  been estimated for systemic  toxicants  (toxicants for which
  cancer is not the endpoint of concern). The first, RfDS or
  subchronic  reference dose, is an estimate of an  exposure
  level that would  not be expected to cause adverse  effects
  when exposure occurs during a limited time interval. The RfD
  is an estimate of an exposure level that would not be  expect-
  ed to cause adverse effects when exposure occurs for a sig-
  nificant portion of the lifespan.
  Specifications:  Prepared in cooperation with Syracuse Re-
  search Corp., NY. 77p.
  Subject Index  keywords: Hazardous  materials,  Industrial
  hygiene,  Toxicology, Environmental  surveys, Occupational
  safety and  health, Toxic substances, Environmental  health,
  Trichloroethylene.

1049   Health Effects Assessment for Xylenes
  Order Number PB90:1425C)6CDH, price:  PC A04/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH.
  Environmental Criteria and Assessment Office.; Syracuse
  Research Corp., NY; Aug 89
  The report summarizes  and evaluates information relevant to
  a preliminary interim assessment of  adverse health  effects
  associated with specific chemicals or compounds. The Office
  of Emergency and Remedial  Response  (Superfund)  uses
  these documents iq preparing cost-benefit analyses under
  Executive Order  12991  for decision-making under  CERCLA.
  All estimates of acceptable intakes and carcinogenic potency
  presented in the document should be considered as  prelimi-
  nary and reflect limited resources allocated  to the  project.
  The intent in the assessments is to suggest  acceptable ex-
  posure levels whenever sufficient data are available.  The in-
  terim values presented reflect the relative degree of hazard
  associated  with  exposure or  risk to the chemical(s) ad-
  dressed. Whenever possible, two categories  of values  have
  been estimated  for systemic  toxicants  (toxicants for which
  cancer is not the  endpoint of concern). The first, RfDS or
  subchronic reference dose, is an estimate of an  exposure
  level that would  not be expected to cause adverse effects
  when exposure occurs during a limited time interval. The RfD
  is an estimate of an exposure level that would not be  expect-
  ed to cause adverse effects when exposure occurs for a sig-
  nificant portion of the lifespan.
  Specifications: Prepared in cooperation with Syracuse Re-
  search Corp., NY. 52p.
  Subject index keywords: Xylenes,  Hazardous materials, In-
  dustrial hygiene, Toxicology, Environmental surveys, Occupa-
  tional  safety and  health, Toxic substances,  Environmental
  health.

1050  Health Effects Assessment for 2,4,5-
  Trichlorophenoxy Acetic Acid (2,4,5-T)
  Order Number PB90-142365CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH.
  Environmental Criteria and Assessment Office; Aug 89
  The report summarizes and evaluates information relevant to
  a preliminary interim assessment of adverse health effects
  associated with specific chemicals or compounds. The Office
  of Emergency and  Remedial  Response (Superfund) uses
  these documents  in preparing cost-benefit analyses under
  Executive Order 12991  for decision-making under CERCLA.
  All estimates of acceptable intakes and carcinogenic potency
  presented in the document should be considered as prelimi-
  nary and reflect limited  resources allocated to the project.
  The intent in the assessments is to suggest acceptable ex-
  posure levels whenever sufficient data are available. The in-
  terim values presented  reflect the relative degree of hazard
  associated  with exposure or  risk  to the  chemical(s)  ad-
  dressed. Whenever possible, two categories of values have
  been  estimated for systemic  toxicants (toxicants for which
  cancer is not the endpoint of concern).  The first, RfDS or
  subchronic  reference dose, is an estimate of an  exposure
  level that would not be expected to cause adverse effects
  when exposure occurs during a limited time interval. The RfD
  is an estimate of an exposure level that would not be expect-
  ed to cause adverse effects when exposure occurs for a sig-
  nificant portion of the lifespan.
  Specifications: 49p.
  Subject index keywords: Acetic acid, Hazardous materials,
  Industrial hygiene, Toxicology, Environmental surveys, Occu-
  pational safety and health, Toxic substances, Environmental
  health.

1051   Health Effects Assessment Summary Tables
  Order Number PB92-921100CDH, price: Standing Order, call
  for price
  Environmental  Protection Agency, Washington, DC;  1992
  The document is an excellent 'pointer' system to identify cur-
  rent  literature  or changes in assessment criteria  for many
  chemicals of interest to Superfund. It was prepared for Su-
  perfund use by the Environmental  Criteria and Assessment
  Office (ECAO- Gin) in EPA's  Office of Health and Environ-
  mental Assessment. Chemicals  considered  are  those for
  which Health  Effects  Assessment  Documents, Health and
  Environmental  Effects  Profiles,  Health Assessment Docu-
  ments or Air Quality Criteria Documents have been prepared
  by ECAO. Radionuclides considered are those believed to be
  most  common at  Superfund sites.  Tables summarize refer-
  ence  doses (RfDs) for  toxicity from subchronic and chronic
  inhalation, oral exposure, slope factors and unit risk values
  for carcinogenicity  based on lifetime inhalation  and oral ex-
  posure, and radionuclide carcinogenicity.
  Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, De-
  posit Account required (Minimum  deposit $100 U.S., Canada,
  and  Mexico; all others $200). Single copies also  available.
196

-------
                                                               PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Risk Management
  Issued and superseded quarterly. Supersedes PB91-921100 .
  4 issues.
  Subject index keywords:  Public health,  Hazardous materi-
  als, Radioactive  wastes, Chemical compounds,  Superfund
  program,  Environmental impact assessments, Biological  ef-
  ifects, Health hazards.

1052  Health Effects Assessment Summary Tables
  Order Number PB93-921100CDH, price: Standing Order, call
  for price
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC; 1993
  The document is an excellent 'pointer' system to identify cur-
  rent literature or changes  in assessment criteria for many
  chemicals of interest to Superfund. It was prepared for Su-
  perfund use  by the Environmental Criteria and Assessment
  Office (ECAO- Cin) in  EPA's Office of Health and Environ-
  mental  Assessment. Chemicals considered are  those  for
  which Health Effects Assessment Documents, Health and
  Environmental Effects  Profiles,  Health Assessment  Docu-
  ments or  Air Quality Criteria Documents have been prepared
  by ECAO. Radionuclides considered are those believed to be
  most common at Superfund sites. Tables summarize refer-
  ence doses (RfDs) for toxicity from subchronic and  chronic
  inhalation, oral exposure, slope factors and unit  risk values
  for carcinogenicity based on lifetime  inhalation and oral ex-
  posure, and radionuclide carcinogenicity.
  Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing  Order, De-
  posit Account required (Minimum deposit $100 U.S., Canada,
  and Mexico; all  others $200). Single copies also available.
  Issued and superseded quarterly. Supersedes PB92-921100 .
  4 issues.
  Subject index keywords:  Public health,  Hazardous materi-
  als, Radioactive  wastes, Chemical compounds,  Superfund
  program,  Environmental impact assessments, Biological  ef-
  fects, Health hazards.

1053  Health Effects Assessment Summary Tables
  Order Number PB94-921100CDH, price: Standing Order, call
  for price
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC; 1994
  The document is an excellent 'pointer' system to identify cur-
  rent literature or changes  in assessment criteria for many
  chemicals of interest to Superfund. It was prepared for Su-
  perfund use  by the Environmental Criteria and Assessment
  Office (ECAO- Cin) in  EPA's Office of  Health and Environ-
  mental  Assessment. Chemicals considered are  those  for
  which Health Effects Assessment Documents, Health and
  Environmental Effects  Profiles,  Health Assessment  Docu-
  ments or  Air Quality Criteria Documents have been prepared
  by ECAO. Radionuclides considered are those believed to be
  most common at Superfund sites. Tables summarize refer-
  ence doses (RfDs) for toxicity from subchronic and  chronic
  inhalation, oral exposure, slope factors and unit  risk values
  for carcinogenicity based on lifetime  inhalation and oral ex-
  posure, and radionuclide carcinogenicity.
  Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing  Order, De-
  posit Account required (Minimum deposit $100 U.S., Canada,
  and Mexico;  all  others $200). Single copies also available.
  Issued and superseded quarterly. Supersedes PB93-921100 .
  4 issues.
  Subject index keywords:  Public health,  Hazardous materi-
  als, Radioactive  wastes, Chemical compounds,  Superfund
  program,  Environmental impact assessments, Biological  ef-
  fects, Health hazards.
1054  Health Effects Assessment Summary Tables Fourth
  Quarter FY 1989
  Order Number PB90-921100CDH, price: Standing Order, call
  for price
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC; Oct 89
  The document is an excellent 'pointer' system to identify cur-
  rent literature or changes  in assessment criteria for many
  chemicals  of interest to Superfund.  It was prepared for Su-
  perfund  use  by  the Environmental  Criteria and Assessment
  Office (ECAO- Cin) in  EPA's Office of Health and Environ-
  mental Assessment. Chemicals considered are those for
  which Health Effects Assessment  Documents,  Health and
  Environmental Effects  Profiles,  Health  Assessment  Docu-
  ments or Air Quality Criteria Documents have been prepared
  by ECAO. Radionuclides considered are those believed to be
  most common at Superfund sites.  Tables summarize refer-
  ence doses (RfDs) for toxicity from subchronic and chronic
  inhalation,  oral exposure, slope factors and unit risk values
  for carcinogenicity based on lifetime inhalation and oral ex-
  posure, and radionuclide carcinogenicity.
  Specifications:  Paper copy available on Standing Order, De-
  posit Account required  (Minimum deposit $100 North Ameri-
  can Continent; all others $200). Single copies also available.
  Issued and superseded quarterly. 1p.
  Subject index keywords:  Public health,  Hazardous materi-
  als, Radioactive wastes, Chemical  compounds,  Superfund
  program, Environmental impact assessments, Biological ef-
  fects,  Health hazards.

1055  Identification of SARA (Superfund Amendments and
  Reauthorization Act) Compounds in Adipose Tissue
  Order Number PB90-132564CDH, price: PC A07/MF A01
  Midwest Research Inst., Kansas City, MO.; Environmental
  Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of Toxic
  Substances; 31 Aug 89
  The National Human Adipose Tissue Survey  (NHATS), ad-
  ministered  by EPA/OTS, is an on-going chemical monitoring
  network designed to detect levels and  prevalences of toxic
  substances in the adipose tissue of the general U.S. popula-
  tion. Adipose specimens collected in fiscal  year 1982 were
  analyzed as composites for volatile and semivolatile organic
  compounds via  HRGC/MS  as  part of a previous effort. The
  data files were then processed to determine the occurrence
  of  compounds selected from  the  Superfund Amendments
  and Reauthorization Act (SARA) Title III Toxic Chemical List-
  ing, and from the SARA Section 110 CERCLA listing of 100
  hazardous  substances.  A total of 61 volatile and 120 semivo-
  latile target compounds were selected for analysis from the
  listings based on their predicted suitability to the analytical
  method. Application of target compound analysis (TCA) to 46
  composited adipose tissue samples resulted in the identifica-
  tion of 13 volatile and 19 semivolatile compounds. Frequency
  of occurrence data was compiled with respect to three age
  groups, four census regions and nine census divisions.
  Specifications:   Sponsored  by Environmental  Protection
  Agency, Washington, DC. Office of  Toxic  Substances. 139p.
  Subject index  keywords: Superfund program, Hazardous
  substances, Adipose tissue.
                                                                                                               197

-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Risk Management
1056  Implementing the Deputy Administrator's Risk
  Characterization Memorandum
  Order Number PB93-963317CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 26 May 92
  The directive implements the Superfund program recommen-
  dations of the Deputy Administrator, dated February 26, 1992
  Guidance on Risk Characterization for Risk  Managers and
  Risk Assessors.
  Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
  posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
  and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
  paper copy or microfiche. 47p.
  Subject index keywords: Waste management, Superfund,
  Hazardous materials, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
  Response.

1057  Interim Guidance for Soil Ingestion Rates
  Order Number PB91-139709CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 27 Jan 89
  The directive provides guidance to the Regions on soil inges-
  tion rate assumptions recommended for  use in developing
  exposure scenarios for Superfund-lead  and enforcement-lead
  site risk assessments. The purpose of the guidance is to en-
  hance consistency among Regional risk assessments and
  reconrtmend an ingestion rate for soil initiated by Headquar-
  ters, the directive supersedes 'Superfund Public Health Eval-
  uation Manual,' directive no. 9285.4-01 dated October 1986,
  only with reference to soil ingestion rates.
  Specifications: See also PB87-183125. 7p.
  Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
  Hazardous materials, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
  Response.

1058  Limited-Use Chemical Protective Clothing for EPA
  Superfund Activities
  Order Number PB92-143494CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
  Uttle (Arthur D.), Ina, Cambridge, MA. New York State Coll.
  of Human Ecology, Ithaca.  Dept. of Design and
  Environmental Science.; Environmental Protection Agency,
  Cincinnati, OH.  Risk Reduction Engineering Lab;  Feb 92
  Because contractor  field  personnel complained about the
  poor durability and  fit  of limited-use chemical  protective
  clothing (CPC) most commonly used at hazardous waste site
  operations, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency  (EPA)
  initiated a study to: characterize use of CPC; determine prob-
  lems,  and communicate results in publications and procure-
  ment  guidelines. Personnel  at  two Superfund hazardous
  waste sites were surveyed about CPC problems. Poor fit of
  coveralls and lack of fabric durability resulted  in  garment fail-
  ures, especially in the seat, crotch, and underarms.  Some
  fabrics were  identified that provided improved performance.
  The commercial market was surveyed, and commercial fab-
  rics for limited-use CPC were identified and obtained.  Avail-
  able standards and specifications describing size and fit pa-
  rameters for limited-use CPC  were  identified and  reviewed
  relative to  EPA Superfund  CPC needs. None of the stand-
  ards were  found to be  fully acceptable. American National
  Standards Institute (ANSI)  Standard 101-1985, however, pro-
  vided  a satisfactory baseline for further  standards develop-
  ment.  Problems  with CPC were analyzed and suggested
  changes to ANSI  101 were developed as a proposed pro-
  curement guideline. The information was presented to the In-
  dustrial Safety Equipment Association, which developed the
  ANSI standard.
  Specifications:   Prepared  in  cooperation with New York
  State Coll. of Human Ecology, Ithaca. Dept.  of Design and
  Environmental Science. Sponsored by Environmental Protec-
  tion Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk Reduction Engineering Lab.
  46p.
  Subject index keywords: Protective clothing,  Superfund,
  Chemical compounds, Hazardous  materials,  Occupational
  safety and protection, Waste disposal.

1059  Meeting Summary: National Advisory Council on
  Environmental Policy and Technology (1st).
  Subcommittee on Radiation Cleanup Regulation. Held in
  Washington, DC. on October 18-19, 1993
  Order Number PB94-136678CDH, price: PC A05/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Radiation and Indoor Air; Jan 94
  The National Advisory Council  for Environmental Policy and
  Technology (NACEPT) Subcommittee on Radiation Cleanup
  Regulations is a committee chartered under the Federal Ad-
  visory Committee Act to provide advice and counsel to the
  Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)
  on issues associated with the management of environmental
  problems.  NACEPT  initiated this  Subcommittee  to  advise
  EPA on the development of a Radiation Cleanup Regulation.
  The purpose of the  meeting was to convene the NACEPT
  Subcommittee, discuss the  radiation cleanup regulation rule
  making and the Subcommittee's work, provide background
  briefings on key issues, and discuss and offer comment  to
  EPA on those issues. The three key issues EPA is currently
  exploring as they begin the development of a draft rule on
  radiation cleanup regulations  are: questions  about cleanup
  levels/risk levels; future land use/state  and local statutes;
  and site-specific public involvement.
  Specifications:  See also PB94-112349. 79p.
  Subject index keywords: Radioactive waste management,
  Meetings, Pollution regulations.

1060  Nature and Extent of Ecological Risks at Superfund
  Sites and RCRA (Resource Conservation and Recovery
  Act) Facilities (Executive Summary Included)
  Order Number PB90-137316CDH, price: PC A10/MF A02
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Policy, Planning and Evaluation; Jun 89
  The Office of Policy  Analysis within EPA has been conduct-
  ing a study of the ecological risks posed by Superfund Sites
  and RCRA Facilities. In June 1989, OPA completed the first
  phase of the study  and the report presents the  results  of
  OPA's efforts to characterize the nature and extent of eco-
  logical  risks at  Superfund  sites and  RCRA facilities. The
  report is divided into  two main parts: Part I addresses Super-
  fund sites and Part II  addresses RCRA facilities.
  Specifications:  219p.
  Subject index keywords: Ecology,  Hazardous  materials,
  Risk.
198

-------
                                                              PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Risk Management
1061  New Policy on Performance of Risk Assessments
  during Remedial Investigation Feasibility Studies (RI/FS)
  Conducted by Potentially Responsible Parties (PRPs)
  Order Number PB93-963620CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 1  Sep 93
  The memorandum announces EPA's new policy on conduct-
  ing risk assessments at Superfund sites where potentially re-
  sponsible parties (PRPs) are conducting the remedial investi-
  gation/feasibility studies (RI/FS)  and the Agency's reasons
  for adopting the policy.
  Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
  posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
  and Mexico; all others $400).  Single copies also available in
  paper copy or microfiche. 6p.
  Subject index keywords: Superfund, Risk assessment, Haz-
  ardous materials.

1062  OSWER Comparative Risk Project. Executive
  Summary and  Overview
  Order Number PB90-272501CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Emergency and Remedial Response; Nov 89
  The document  discusses the study undertaken by the Office
  of Solid Waste and Emergency Response (OSWER) to ex-
  plore the comparative risks posed by various waste manage-
  ment practices regulated by and/or under OSWER purview.
  It describes the study's position as an early step in the larger
  strategic planning process, undertaken to gain experience in
  performing comparative analysis.
  Specifications: 72p.
  Subject index keywords: Project management,  Research
  projects, Waste management, Office of  Solid Waste  and
  Emergency Response, Risk assessment.

1063  Quantifying Effects in Ecological Site Assessments:
  Biological and Statistical Considerations
  Order Number PB91-129189CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
  Corvallis Environmental Research Lab., OR.; NSI Technology
  Services Corp., Corvallis, OR; 1990
  The United States Environmental Protection  Agency is  re-
  sponsible for developing methods to control potentially harm-
  ful chemicals entering the environment. The determination  of
  harm is often based on laboratory toxicity tests of chemicals
  using plants and animals. The  vast number of toxicity tests of
  single chemicals that have been produced to date provide an
  extensive data base to help determine potential  harm  of
  chemicals to humans and the environment. At Corvallis, the
  authors have been working on various toxicity test methods
  and on site characterization/assessment methods for some
  time. Slightly more than two years ago, ERL-Corvallis began
  to address ways of integrating methods to achieve meaning-
  ful ecological assessments of hazardous waste sites. Exam-
  ples of research activities in Corvallis are presented.
  Specifications: Presented at OPPE Workshop on Statistical
  Issues for Superfund, Crystal  City, VA., February 1990. Pre-
  pared in cooperation with NSI Technology Services Corp.,
  Corvallis, OR. 31 p.
  Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste dis-
  posal, Toxicity,  Meetings, Superfund.
1064  Recent Advances in Risk Reduction Engineering
  Order Number PB90-129339CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk
  Reduction Engineering Lab;  1989    ,            .
  Contemporary environmental legislation such as the Compre-
  hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
  ity Act of 1980  and the  Superfund Amendment and Reau-
  thorization  Act of  1986 emphasize the reduction  of risk of
  damage to the environment and human health  as the  basis
  of environmental management.  There is a hierarchy of ap-
  proaches  to risk reduction including  source  control, reuse
  and recycle, treatment and exposure  minimization.  Recent
  examples of these approaches, which were evaluated by the
  Risk Reduction  Engineering Laboratory, are presented  in-
  cluding:  Superfund innovative  technology demonstrations,
  waste reduction techniques, protective  clothing and  an
  expert system to assess risk.
  Specifications:  Presented  at Pan Pacific Cooperative Sym-
  posium (1st), on Industrialization and Emerging  Environmen-
  tal Health Issues, Kitakyushu, Japan, October 2-6, 1989. 14p.
  Subject index keywords:  Public health, Hazardous materi-
  als, Risk  assessment,  Environment management, Waste
  management.
1065  Risk Assessment Guidance for Superfund. Volume
  1. Human Health Evaluation Manual. Part A
  Order Number PB90-155581CDH, price: PC A13/MF A02
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Dec 89
  The document is part of a two-manual  set entitled 'Risk As-
  sessment Guidance for Superfund.' One manual,  the 'Envi-
  ronmental Evaluation Manual,' provides guidance for ecologi-
  cal  assessment  at Superfund sites; the other, the 'Human
  Health Evaluation Manual,'  provides guidance for health risk
  assessment of these sites.  The  'Risk Assessment Guidance
  for Superfund' manuals were developed to be used during
  the Removal  and Remedial  Investigation/Feasibility Study
  (RI/FS) processes at Superfund sites. The analytical frame-
  work and specific methods described in the manuals, howev-
  er,  may also be  applicable to evaluations  of hazardous
  wastes and hazardous materials for other purposes. The two
  manuals in the  set have  somewhat different target  audi-
  ences. The 'Environmental  Evaluation Manual'  primarily ad-
  dresses Remedial Project Managers (RPMs and  On-Scene
  Coordinators (OSCs)), who are responsible for ensuring  a
  thorough evaluation  of  potential  environmental  effects at
  sites. The  'Human Health  Evaluation Manual'  provides for
  the risk assessor - Updated procedures and policies, specific
  equations and variable values for estimating exposure, and a
  hierarchy of toxicity data sources.
  Specifications:  See also Volume 2, PB90-155599. 290p.
  Subject index keywords: Toxicology, Risk assessment, Su-
  perfund program.
1066  Risk Assessment Guidance for Superfund. Volume
  1. Human Health Evaluation Manual. Part A, April 1990
  Order Number PB90-273830CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Emergency and Remedial Response; Apr 90
  The fact sheet designed to  alert RPMs and other personnel
  to (1) new aspects of the Human Health Evaluation  Manual
  (Part A), (2) the purpose  and steps of the baseline risk as-
  sessment, and (3) where additional help can be obtained.
                                                                                                              199

-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Risk Management
  Specifications: See also PB90-155581. 9p.
  Subject  Index  keywords:  Hazardous  materials,  Public
  health, Guidelines, Superfund,  Office of Solid  Waste and
  Emergency Response,  Waste  management,  Risk assess-
  ment.
1067  Risk Assessment Guidance for Superfund. Volume
  1. Human Health Evaluation Manual (Part B)
  Order Number PB92-963339CDH,  price: PC A02/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency,  Washington,  DC. Office of
  Emergency and Remedial Response; Dec 91
  EPA's Human Health Evaluation Manual, which describes the
  process of gathering information  and assessing the risk to
  human health, and the Environment Evaluation Manual com-
  prise a two-volume set called Risk Assessment Guidance for
  Superfund (RAGS). The HHEM has three main parts: Part A,
  Which discusses the  baseline  risk assessment, Part B, Devel-
  opment of Risk-based Preliminary Remediation  Goals, and
  Part C,  Risk  Evaluation  of Remedial Alternatives. The fact
  sheet is  designed to introduce remedial project managers
  and other personnel to  the information that is  available in
  RAGS/HHEM Part B on developing risk-based preliminary
  remediation goals for chemicals of concern at CERCLA sites.
  Specifications: Paper copy available  on Standing Order, de-
  posit account required (minimum deposit $200  U.S., Canada,
  and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
  paper copy or microfiche. 7p.
  Subject  Index  keywords:  Toxicity,  Hazardous  materials,
  Public  health, Pollution control,  Superfund,  Remediation
  goals.
1068 Risk Assessment Guidance for Superfund. Volume
  1. Human Health Evaluation  Manual (Part B, Development
  of Risk-Based Preliminary Remediation Goals)
  Order Number PB92-963333CDH,  price: PC A04/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency,  Washington,  DC. Office of
  Emergency and Remedial Response; Dec 91
  The document is one of  a three-part  series. Part B provides
  guidance on using USEPA toxicity values and exposure infor-
  mation to derive risk-based preliminary remedial goals  (PRG)
  for a CERCLA site. Initially developed at the scoping  phase
  using readily available information, risk-based PRGs general-
  ly are modified based on site-specific data gathered during
  the remedial  investigation/feasibility study.  The  guidance
  does not discuss the risk  management decisions  that are
  necessary at a CERCLA site. The potential users  of Part B
  are those involved in the remedy  selection and implementa-
  tion process,  including risk assessors,  risk assessment re-
  viewers,  remedial project  managers, and  other  decision-
  makers.
  Specifications: Paper copy available  on Standing Order, de-
  posit account required (minimum deposit $200  U.S., Canada,
  and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
  paper copy or microfiche. See also PB92-963334. 66p.
  Subject  Index  keywords:  Hazardous  materials,  Public
  health, Pollution control, Superfund.
1069 Risk Assessment Guidance for Superfund. Volume
  1. Human Health Evaluation  Manual (Part C)
  Order Number PB92-963340CDH,  price: PC A02/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Emergency and Remedial Response; Dec 91
  EPA's Human Health Evaluation Manual, which describes the
  process of gathering information  and assessing the risk to
  human health, and the Environment Evaluation Manual com-
  prise a two-volume set called Risk Assessment Guidance for
  Superfund (RAGS). The HHEM has three main parts: Part A,
  which discusses the baseline risk assessment, Part B, Devel-
  opment of Risk-based Preliminary Remediation Goals, and
  Part  C, Risk Evaluation of Remedial Alternatives. The fact
  sheet is designed to introduce remedial  project managers
  and other personnel to the information that is available in
  RAGS/HHEM Part C on using human health risk information
  to evaluate remedial alternatives.
  Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
  posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
  and Mexico; all others $400). Single  copies also available in
  paper copy or microfiche. 8p.
  Subject index  keywords:  Toxicity, Hazardous  materials,
  Public health, Pollution control, Superfund, Risk assessment.

1070  Risk Assessment Guidance for Superfund. Volume
  1. Human Health Evaluation Manual (Part C, Risk
  Evaluation of Remedial Alternatives)
  Order Number PB92-963334CDH, price: PC A05/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Emergency and Remedial Response; Dec 91
  The document is one of a three-part series.  Part C provides
  guidance  on the  human health risk  evaluations of  remedial
  alternatives that are conducted during the feasibility study,
  during selection and documentations  of a remedy, and during
  and after remedy implementation. Part  C provides  general
  guidance  to  assist  in  site-specific risk  evaluations and to
  maintain flexibility in  the analysis and decision-making proc-
  ess. The  potential users of Part  C are  persons involved in
  the remedy selection and  implementation  process, including
  risk assessors, risk assessment reviewers, remedial project
  managers, and other decision-makers.
  Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
  posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
  and Mexico; all others $400). Single  copies also available in
  paper copy or microfiche. See also PB92-963333. 77p.
  Subject  index   keywords:  Hazardous  materials,  Public
  health, Pollution control, Superfund.

1071  Risk Assessment Guidance for Superfund. Volume
  1. Human Health Evaluation Manual. Supplemental
  Guidance: 'Standard Default Exposure Factors'
  Order Number PB91-921314CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Emergency and Remedial Response; 25 Mar  91
  The document supplements the Risk Assessment Guidance
  for Superfund (RAGS): Human  Health  Evaluation Manual,
  Part A. Where exposure factors  presented in  the guidance
  differ from those in Part A, the values found  in the guidance
  supersede those in  Part A. The guidance  was developed to
  encourage a consistent approach to characterizing  potential
  human exposures at Superfund sites. The exposure factors
  presented  in the document  are  generally considered most
  appropriate for estimating  Reasonable Maximum Exposures
  (RME), and should be used  in  baseline  risk  assessments
  unless alternate or site-specific values can be clearly justified
  by supporting data.
  Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
  posit account required (minimum deposit $150 U.S., Canada,
  and Mexico; all others $300). Single  copies also available in
  paper copy or microfiche. See also PB90-155581. 28p.
200

-------
                                                              PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Risk Management
  Subject index keywords: Public health, Humans, Exposure,
  Hazardous materials, Superfund, Risk assessment.

1072  Risk Assessment Guidance for Superfund. Volume
  2. Environmental Evaluation Manual
  Order Number PB90-155599CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Mar 89
  The document is part of a two-manual set entitled 'Risk As-
  sessment Guidance for Superfund.' One manual, the 'Envi-
  ronmental Evaluation Manual,' provides guidance for ecologi-
  cal assessment at Superfund sites; the other, the 'Human
,  Health  Evaluation Manual,' provides guidance for health risk
  assessment of these sites. The 'Risk Assessment Guidance
  for Superfund' manuals were developed to  be used  during
  the  Removal  and Remedial  investigation/Feasibility Study
  (RI/FS) processes at Superfund sites. The  analytical frame-
  work and  specific methods described in the manuals, howev-
  er, may also be  applicable  to evaluations of  hazardous
  wastes and hazardous materials for other purposes. The two
  manuals in the set have somewhat different target audi-
  ences.  The 'Environmental Evaluation  Manual' primarily  ad-
  dresses Remedial  Project Managers (RPMs) and On-Scene
  Coordinators (OSCs)), who are responsible for ensuring a
 .thorough  evaluation of potential  environmental  effects at
 -sites. The 'Environmental Evaluation Manual' is not a  de-
  tailed  'how-to'  type  of guidance, and  it does not provide
  'cookbook' approaches for evaluation.
  Specifications:  See also Volume 1, PB90-155581. 63p.
  Subject index keywords: Ecology, Superfund program, Risk
  assessment.

1073  Risk Assessment in Superfund: A Primer. First
  Edition, September 1990
  Order Number PB91-214197CDH, price:  PC A05/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Emergency and Remedial Response; Apr 91
  The document is an introduction to risk assessment for  Su-
  perfund Remedial  Project Managers (RPMs) and On-Scene
  Coordinators (OSCs). This is  an internal training document.
  Specifications:  87p.
  Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
  Hazardous materials, Risk assessment, Office of Solid Waste
  and Emergency Response.

1074  Role of Health Research in Support of EPA's
  Regulatory Programs
  Order Number PB91-211912CDH, price:  PC A06/MF A01
  Eastern Research Group, Inc., Arlington, MA.; Environmental
  Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of Health
  Research; Jun 90
  The document highlights the  ongoing role of environmental
  health  research in support of the Environmental Protection
  Agency's regulatory programs. It summarizes the key legisla-
  tion, emphasizing the uses of health research, and identifies
  the most  important research  needs for each program office.
  The document shows the key role played by environmental
  health  research in EPA's regulatory activities and points out
  that certain research  needs are common across all the pro-
  grams.
  Specifications:    Sponsored by  Environmental  Protection
  Agency, Washington, DC. Office of Health  Research.  104p.
  Subject index  keywords:  Health  risk, Environmental  re-
  search, Pollution regulations,  Public health.
1075  Role of the Baseline Risk Assessment in Superfund
  Remedy Selection Decisions
  Order Number PB91-921359CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Emergency and Remedial Response; Apr 91
  The objective of the memorandum is to provide further guid-
  ance on how to use the  baseline risk assessment to make
  risk management decisions such  as determining whether re-
  medial action under CERCLA Sections 104 or 106 is neces-
  sary. The memorandum also clarifies the use of the base line
  risk assessment  in  selecting appropriate remedies  under
  CERCLA  Section 121, promotes consistency in preparing
  site-specific risk assessments, and helps ensure  that appro-
  priate documentation from the baseline risk assessment is in-
  cluded in Superfund remedy selection documents.
  Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
  posit account required (minimum deposit $150 U.S., Canada,
  and Mexico; all others $300). Single copies also  available in
  paper copy or microfiche.  11 p.
  Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Risk assess-
  ment, Superfund.

1076  Site Assessment: Evaluating Risks at Superfund
  Sites
  Order Number PB93-963347CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Sep 93
  The report includes an overview of the site assessment proc-
  ess within the  Superfund program and answers commonly
  asked questions.
  Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
  posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
  and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also  available in
  paper copy or microfiche.  8p.
  Subject index keywords: Superfund, Hazardous materials,
  Waste disposal, Pollution control.

1077  Summary of Ecological Risks, Assessment Methods,
  and Risk Management Decisions in Superfund  and RCRA
  (Resource Conservation and Recovery Act)
  Order Number PB90-137340CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Policy, Planning and Evaluation; Jun 89
  In developing and implementing  programs under the  Com-
  prehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Li-
  ability Act (CERCLA), EPA has focused primarily  on analysis
  and mitigation of human health risks and less emphasis has
  been placed on analysis and mitigation of ecological threats
  at Superfund sites.  As an initial step in investigating  issues
  related to ecological threats at Superfund sites, EPA's Office
  of Policy Analysis has conducted a study  of three broad
  topics:  (1) the nature and extent  of ecological threats at Su-
  perfund sites: (2) the ecological assessment methods that
  have been  used in the Superfund  program: and  (3)  the
  extent to which ecological concerns have been used as a
  basis for decision making at Superfund sites.
  Specifications:  45p.
  Subject index  keywords: Ecology, Hazardous materials,
  Public health.
                                                                                                             201

-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: RI/FS & RODS
Process
1078  Supplemental Guidance on Performing Risk
  Assessments in Remedial Investigation/Feasibility
  Studies (RI/FSs). Conducted by Potentially Responsible
  Parties (PRPs)
  Order lumber PB91-205526CDH, price: PC A06/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Solid V/aste and Emergency Response; 1991
  The purpose of the directive is to provide additional guidance
  on implementing the policy that EPA will not enter into settle-
  ment agreements under which PRPs perform the risk assess-
  ment components of the RI/FS, as discussed by the Agency
  in  OSWER  Directive No.  9835.15 (August  28, 1990).  The
  memorandum  provides guidance on coordinating  the  site
  characterization tasks and feasibility study  prepared by the
  PRP wjth the baseline risk assessment performed by EPA.
  Specifications:  102p.
  Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
  Hazardous materials, Risk assessment, Office of Solid Waste
  and Emergency Response, Potentially responsible parties.

1079  Supplemental Guidance to RAGS: Calculating the
  Concentration Term. Volume 1, Number 1, May 1992
  Order Number PB92:963373CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Emergency and Remedial Response;  May 92
  The bulletin  explains the concentration term in the exposure/
  intake equation to remedial project managers, risk assessors,
  statisticians, and other personnel. This bulletin presents the
  general intake equation as presented in RAGS/HHEM  Part
  A,  discusses basic concepts concerning the concentration
  term, describes generally  how to calculate the concentration
  term,  presents  examples  to   illustrate  several  important
  points, and identifies where to get additional help.
  Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
  posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
  and Mexico; all others $400). Single  copies also available in
  paper copy or microfiche.  10p.
  Subject index keywords: Superfund, Hazardous materials,
  Waste  management, Environmental  health,  Office of Solid
  Waste  and  Emergency Response,  Risk Assessment Guid-
  ance for Superfund.

1080  Updated Health Effects Assessment for Acetone
  Order Number PB90-142373CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati,  OH.
  Environmental Criteria and Assessment Office.; Syracuse
  Research Corp., NY; Apr 88
  The report summarizes and evaluates information relevant to
  a preliminary interim assessment of adverse health effects
  associated with specific chemicals or compounds. The Office
  of  Emergency  and Remedial  Response  (Superfund) uses
  these documents  in preparing  cost-benefit  analyses under
  Executive Order 12991 for decision-making  under CERCLA.
  All estimates of acceptable intakes and carcinogenic potency
  presented in the document should be considered as prelimi-
  nary and  reflect limited resources allocated to the  project.
  The intent in the assessments is to  suggest acceptable ex-
  posure levels whenever sufficient data are available. The in-
  terim values presented reflect the relative degree of hazard
  associated with exposure or  risk  to  the  chemical(s)  ad-
  dressed. Whenever possible, two categories of values have
  been estimated for systemic toxicants (toxicants for which
  cancer is not the  endpoint of concern). The first,  RfDS or
  subchronic reference dose, is an estimate  of an exposure
  level that would not be expected to cause adverse effects
  when exposure occurs during a limited time interval. The RfD
  is an estimate of an exposure level that would not be expect-
  ed to cause adverse effects when exposure occurs for a sig-
  nificant portion of the lifespan.
  Specifications:  Prepared in cooperation with Syracuse Re-
  search Corp., NY. 32p.
  Subject index keywords: Acetone,  Hazardous materials, In-
  dustrial hygiene, Toxicology, Environmental surveys, Occupa-
  tional safety and health, Toxic substances,  Environmental
  health.

1081  Use of IRIS Values in Superfund Risk Assessment
  Order Number PB93-963360CDH, price: PC A01/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Emergency and Remedial Response; 21 Dec 93
  The memorandum clarifies the  policy stated at section  7.4.1
  of the December 1988 Risk Assessment Guidance for Super-
  fund (Volume I) Human Health Evaluation Manual  (Part A)
  (RAGS) on  the  use of Integrated Risk  Information System
  (IRIS) values in performing health risk assessments. Recent
  litigation has called  attention to the need for all persons in-
  volved in the Superfund risk assessment and  remedy selec-
  tion processes to be fully aware of the role of IRIS values in
  those processes.
  Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
  posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
  and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
  paper copy or microfiche. 3p.
  Subject index  keywords:  Superfund,  Risk assessment,
  Toxicology.


PROGRAM  IMPLEMENTATION: RI/FS

& RODS  Process

1082  Accessing the $50 Million Set-Aside in the Remedial
  Action Budget for Quick Response at National Priorities
  List Sites
  Order Number PB92-963342CDH, price: PC A01/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Emergency and Remedial Response; 20 Feb 92
  The  memorandum  establishes  the  procedures required  to
  access the  $50 million that has been  set aside from the
  FY92 Remedial Action budget for quick response at National
  Priorities sites.
  Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
  posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
  and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
  paper copy or microfiche. 4p.
  Subject index keywords: Federal  budgets, Hazardous ma-
  terials, Directives, Superfund, Remedial action.

1083  Compendium of ROD Language for FY  1993 Focus
  Areas
  Order Number PB93-963328CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Apr 93
  The  compendium covers  five major areas  of focus for
  Record of Decision (ROD) language. These include: Ration-
  ale for the  selected remedy, Clean-up  levels,  Eco-risk as-
  sessment, Applicable or Relevant and Appropriate  Require-
202

-------
                                                                   PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: RI/FS & RODS
                                                                                                          Process
  ments  (ARARs), and Enforcement Activities. Examples of
  good documentation of each of the five ROD areas of focus
  are presented in the compendium.
  Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
  posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
  and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
  paper copy or microfiche. 61 p.
  Subject index keywords: Waste  management, Superfund,
  Remedial action, Hazardous materials, Record of Decision.

1084  Conducting Remedial Investigations/Feasibility
  Studies for CERCLA Municipal Landfill Sites
  Order Number PB91-921205CDH, price: PC A14/MF A02
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Emergency and Remedial Response; Feb 91
  The study  aids in  the development of methodologies  and
  tools to assist in streamlining the  Remedial  Investigations/
  Feasibility Studies (RI/FS) and selection of remedy process
  for landfills. The study: (1) develops tools to assist in scoping
  the RI/FS for  municipal  landfill sites, (2) defines  strategies
  for characterizing municipal landfill sites that are on the NPL,
  and (3) identifying practicable remedial action alternatives for
  addressing these types of sites.
  Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
  posit account required (minimum deposit $100 U.S., Canada,
  and Mexico; all others $200). Single copies also available in
  paper copy or microfiche. 307p.
  Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste  dis-
  posal, Earth fills, Municipalities, Superfund.

1085  Cost of Remedial Action Model
  Order Number PB93-963304CDH, price: PC A01/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Solid Waste and Emergency Response; May 91
  The Cost of Remedial Action (CORA) model  is a computer-
  ized expert advisor used to  select remedial actions for Su-
  perfund hazardous  waste sites  and estimate  their costs.  It
  may also be used for RCRA corrective actions. The model is
  used for both current site-specific estimates, and  for program
  budgeting and planning.
  Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
  posit account required (minimum deposit $225 U.S., Canada,
  and Mexico; all others $450). Single copies also available in
  paper copy or microfiche. 4p.
  Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste disposal, Haz-
  ardous  materials, CORA(Cost of Remedial Action).

1086  Cost of Remedial Actions (CORA) Model:  Overview
  and Applications
  Order Number PB93-963318CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Apr 89
  The Cost of Remedial Actions (CORA) model estimates site-
  specific remedial action costs for hazardous waste sites. The
  model is microcomputer-based and has two components: an
  expert  system  to recommend a range of remedial technol-
  ogies, and a cost system. The  expert system interacts with
  the user and develops  ranges  of recommended remedial
  action technologies. The cost system contains algorithms ca-
  pable of developing order-of-magnitude cost estimates for 40
  demonstrated technologies. The model was used by the U.S.
  EPA for the outyear Superfund remedial action budgeting for
  FY 1989, FY 1990,  and  FY 1991 budgeting. The model was
  also used to develop U.S. Navy Installation Program budgets
  for FY 1989, 1990, and 1991.
  Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
  posit account required (minimum deposit $225 U.S., Canada,
  and Mexico; all others $450). Single copies also available in
  paper copy or microfiche. Presented  at HAZMACON  '89,
  Santa Clara, CA., April 1989. 11 p.
  Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste dis-
  posal, Superfund, Cost estimates.

1087  Draft Record of Decision for the Aluminum Smelter
  Conservation/Modernization Program
  Order Number DE87001323CDH, price:  PC A09/MF A01
  Bonneville Power Administration, Portland, OR. Div. of
  Commercial and Industrial Programs.; Department of Energy,
  Washington, DC; May 86
  The program would be available for a 2-year period, with an
  option for BPA to extend it for 1 additional year. The program
  would be available to  all ten Northwest primary aluminum
  smelters for qualifying projects on a first come, first consid-
  ered  basis.  The total program budget over the 10-year pay-
  ment term  would be limited  to $100  million, with annual
  budget expenditures not to exceed $10 million (in 1985 dol-
  lars). The incentive would be a direct payment, for a 10-year
  term, based on the difference in required kWh/lb of alumi-
  num production before and after plant modernization. An in-
  centive of 5 mill/saved  kWh  for plant  production  efficiency
  improvements would be paid  to qualifying projects. The alu-
  minum  companies would propose modernization projects to
  BPA. Minimum criteria would  be described by BPA  in a Re-
  quest  for Proposals. A  reduction in total  power entitlement
  (contract  demand)  would be  required from  the aluminum
  companies  in return for BPA financial participation. The re-
  duction in contract  demand would be equal to the reduction
  in power  requirements resulting from the energy  efficiency
  improvements. Projects selected by BPA would need to dem-
  onstrate actual electric energy electric energy utilization effi-
  ciency improvement (reduced kWhs/lb  of aluminum produc-
  tion) to qualify for  BPA incentive payments. Simple curtail-
  ment of electric energy use would not qualify. Protecting pro-
  prietary information contained in proposals submitted by the
  respective companies would be a condition of the conserva-
  tion/modernization program. BPA will work together with the
  aluminum companies to  establish requirements for proprie-
  tary information and to develop  protective procedures.  BPA
  would conduct an ongoing evaluation of the conservation/
  modernization program and assess the findings on an annual
  basis. If the evaluation suggests that programmatic features
  should be modified  or added to secure additional benefits for
  BPA and the region, BPA would initiate changes in the  pro-
  gram. (ERA citation 12:000688)
  Specifications: Portions  of this document  are illegible in
  microfiche products. 178p.
  Subject index keywords: Aluminium, Metal Industry, Smelt-
  ers.

1088  Feasibility Study: Detailed Analysis of  Remedial
  Action Alternatives
  Order Number PB90-272675CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Emergency  and Remedial Response; Mar 90
  The document is the fourth and final document in a series of
  fact sheets describing the remedial investigation/feasibility
                                                                                                               203

-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: RI/FS & RODS
Process
  study (RI/FS). The fact sheet is a synopsis of Chapter 6 of
  'The Guidance for Conducting  Remedial Investigations and
  Feasibility Studies Under CERCLA' (Directive No. 9355.3-01)
  which addresses the detailed analysis of remedial action  al-
  ternatives. Additionally, the fact  sheet  provides Remedial
  Project  Managers (RPMs) with  information  on  how  to
  manage this phase of the FS efficiently and effectively.
  Specifications:  7p.
  Subject Index keywords: Hazardous materials, Superfund,
  Office of Solid Waste  and Emergency Response, Remedial
  action, Waste management, Preremedial actions.

1089   Feasibility Study: Development and Screening of
  Remedial Action Alternatives
  Order Number PB90-274416CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Emergency and Remedial Response; Nov 89
  The fact sheet provides a summary of Chapter 4 of the 'In-
  terim Final Guidance for Conducting Remedial Investigations
  and Feasibility Studies Under CERCLA' which discusses the
  development and screening of alternatives for Remedial
  Action. The fact sheet also provides information intended to
  assist the  Remedial Project Manager in  managing this por-
  tion of the Feasibility Study efficiently and effectively.
  Specifications:  See also PB90-272675. 7p.
  Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Superfund,
  Waste management, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
  Response, Remedial action.

1090   final Policy on Setting RI/FS Priorities
  Order Number PB91-921324CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Emergency and Remedial Response; 27 Dec 90
  The  directive summarizes the final policy on setting RI/FS
  prioritization. The policy's goal is to demonstrate Super-fund's
  compliance with the Worst  Problems First Policy at the earli-
  est stage of the remedial process. It outlines the specific ob-
  jectives  and goals of the new policy and offers guidance to
  the regions on how best to implement the policy.
  Specifications: Paper  copy available on Standing Order, de-
  posit account required  (minimum deposit $150 U.S.,  Canada,
  and Mexico; all others  $300). Single copies also available in
  paper copy or microfiche. 10p.
  Subject Index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
  Hazardous materials, Remedial action, Office of Solid Waste
  and Emergency Response.

1091   FY 1992 Themes for Regional Coordination to
  Support Continuous Improvements of Superfund's
  Remedial Program
  Order Number PB92-963368CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Emergency and Remedial Response; Dec 91
  The directive outlines the FY 92 themes  for regional coordi-
  nation to support continuous improvements of Superfund's
  remedial program. Themes represent critical program areas
  that  require  special emphasis by Regional management,
  staff, and Regional Coordinators. This effort will improve the
  efficiency and quality of the Superfund program which fur-
  thers their commitment to Total  Quality Management. Re-
  gional Coordinators  will promote  guidance awareness and
  national consistency!
  Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
  posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
  and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
  paper copy or microfiche. 6p.
  Subject index keywords:  Superfund, Waste management,
  Hazardous materials, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
  Response.

1092  Getting Ready: Scoping the RI/FS
  Order Number PB90-274390CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Emergency and Remedial Response; Nov 89
  The fact  sheet summarizes Chapter  Two of 'Interim Final
  Guidance for Conducting Remedial  Investigations and Feasi-
  bility Studies Under CERCLA.' The  Fact Sheet also provides
  information on how to manage the scoping phase of the Rl/
  FS process.
  Specifications: 9p.
  Subject  index  keywords: Hazardous  materials,  Project
  management, Superfund, Waste management, Office of Solid
  Waste and Emergency Response, Remedial action.

1093  Guidance on Implementation of the 'Contribute to
  Remedial Performance' Provision
  Order Number PB93-963413CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Apr 87
  The provision promotes  the performance of removal actions
  that address threats more efficiently by considering the over-
  all site  cleanup before the  start of the action. To the maxi-
  mum extent practicable,  removal actions should be desigend
  to avoid wasteful, repetitive, short-term actions that do not
  contribute to the efficient, cost-effective performance of long-
  term remedial actions to be  taken by the EPA, State, or other
  party. The major  objective  of this requirement is to provide
  maximum protection of public health and  the environment at
  minimal cost by avoidance  of removal restarts. The focus of
  this provision is on avoidance of  restarts that are due to re-
  curring  threats that were not adequately abated in the origi-
  nal removal action, and  threats from deteriorating site condi-
  tions that should have been foreseen.
  Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
  posit account required (minimum deposit $225 U.S., Canada,
  and Mexico; all others $450).  Single copies also available in
  paper copy or microfiche. 6p.
  Subject index keywords:  Superfund,  Hazardous materials,
  Waste disposal, Remedial action.

1094  Guidance on Oversight of Potentially Responsible
  Party Remedial Investigations and Feasibility Studies.
  Volume 1
  Order Number PB91-228361CDH, price: PC A07/MF A02
  PRC Environmental Management, inc., McLean, VA.;
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Jun 91
  Volume 1 of the  document addresses oversight of remedial
  investigations and feasibility studies (RI/FSs) conducted  by
  potentially responsible parties (PRPs) at enforcement-lead
  sites addressed  under  the Comprehensive  Environmental
  Response,  Compensation  and Liability  Act, as  amended
  (CERCLA). It parallels activities described in the 'Guidance
  for Conducting Remedial Investigations and Feasibility Stud-
  ies Under CERCLA' (OSWER Directive No. 9355.3-01, Octo-
204
                  llUliiiiHlll
                                                                                                             I A,

-------
                                                                  PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Rl/FS & RODS
                                                                                                        Process
  ber, 1988, referred to here as the 'RI/FS Guidance') and the
  'Model Statement of Work for a Remedial Investigation and
  Feasibility Study Conducted  by Potentially Responsible Par-
  ties' (OSWER Directive No. 9835.8, June 2, 1989, referred to
  here as the 'Model SOW for PRP-lead  RI/FSs'). It provides
  project managers with  the procedures  required to organize
  and perform appropriate oversight duties and responsibilities.
  The document is guidance only; it is not a binding set of re-
  quirements and does not create rights for any party.
  Specifications:     Also pub.  as  OSWER   DIRECTIVE-
  9835.1 (C). See also Volume  2, PB91-228379. Sponsored by
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Solid Waste and Emergency Response. 127p.
  Subject index keywords: Remedial action,  Hazardous ma-
  terials, Waste management, Superfund,  Potentially responsi-
  ble parties, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response.

1095  Guidance on Oversight of Potentially Responsible
  Party Remedial Investigations and Feasibility Studies.
  Volume 2. Appendices
  Order Number PB91-228379CDH, price:  PC A09/MF A03
  PRC Environmental  Management, Inc., McLean, VA.;
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Jun 91
  Volume 2  of the document describes the oversight of sam-
  pling and analysis activities (Appendix B1) and of well drilling
  and installation activity (Appendix C1)  conducted  during  a
  Remedial Investigation  (Rl) by potentially responsible  parties
  (PRPs) at Enforcement-lead sites addressed under the Com-
  prehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Li-
  ability Act, as amended (CERCLA). Checklists to assist in the
  documentation of sampling  and analysis activities  are con-
  tained  in Appendix  B2 while documentation of well  drilling
  and installation activities are  contained in Appendix C2. The
  information presented in Volume 2 is consistent with the ref-
  erences listed at the end of Appendices B and C.
  Specifications:     Also  pub.  as  OSWER  DIRECTIVE-
  9835.1(D). See also Volume  1, PB91-228361. Sponsored by
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington,  DC.  Office of
  Solid Waste and Emergency Response. 196p.
  Subject index keywords: Remedial action,  Hazardous ma-
  terials, Waste management, Superfund,  Potentially responsi-
  ble parties, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response.
1096  Guide to Addressing Pre-ROD and Post-ROD
  Changes
  Order Number PB91-921351CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Emergency and Remedial Response; Apr 91
  The Fact Sheet outlines the methods  of categorizing  pre-
  and post-ROD changes and the  ways in which  changes
  should be documented. More detailed guidance for pre-ROD
  changes and  both  significant and fundamental post-ROD
  changes can be found  in chapters 5 and 8,  respectively, of
  the Interim Final Guidance on Preparing Superfund  Decision
  Documents (OSWER Directive 9355.3-02).
  Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
  posit account required (minimum deposit $150 U.S., Canada,
  and Mexico; all others $300). Single copies also available in
  paper copy or microfiche. 7p.
  Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
  Hazardous materials, Office of Solid  Waste and Emergency
  Response.
1097  Guide to Developing Action Memorandums
  Order Number PB91-921317CDH, price: PC A01/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Emergency and Remedial Response; Dec 90
  The fact sheet describes the essential components  of Action
  memorandums  used to  initiate a removal  action, as well as
  special cases like  enforcement-lead removals  and special
  circumstances such as actions that require additional funds,
  a change in the scope of response, or an exemption to the
  statutory limits  under section 104(c) of CERCLA. EPA pre-
  pares Action  Memos for  all Fund-lead  removal actions.
  Action  Memos describe a  site's  history,  current activities,
  health and environmental threats, and proposed actions and
  costs.
  Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
  posit account required (minimum deposit $150 U.S., Canada,
  and Mexico; all others $300). Single copies also available in
  paper copy or microfiche. 5p.
  Subject index  keywords: Superfund,  Hazardous materials,
  Waste management, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
  Response.

1098  Guide to Developing Superfund No  Action, Interim
  Action, and Contingency Remedy RODs
  Order Number PB91-921350CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Emergency and Remedial Response; Apr 91
  The guide  provides quick reference to  the essential compo-
  nents  of Records of Decision (RODs)  that are  prepared to
  document three specific types of remedial action decisions:
  (1) no action; (2) interim actions; and (3) contingency reme-
  dies. In preparing one of these three types of RODs, Reme-
  dial Project Managers (RPMs) should  modify the format of
  the 'standard ROD' for final response actions as indicated in
  the guide.
  Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
  posit account required (minimum deposit $150 U.S., Canada,
  and Mexico; all others $300). Single copies also available in
  paper  copy or microfiche. Available separately or as part of
  PB91-921265. 7p.
  Subject index  keywords: Superfund,  Waste management,
  Hazardous materials, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
  Response, Record of Decision.
1099  Guide to Developing Superfund Proposed Plans
  Order Number PB90-273855CDH, price: PC A01/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Emergency and Remedial Response; Nov 89
  The fact sheet outlines the major components of the Super-
  fund Proposed Plan and  suggests effective ways in which the
  various sections can be presented.
  Specifications:  6p.
  Subject index  keywords: Guidelines,  Hazardous materials,
  Superfund, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response,
  Waste management.

1100  Guide to Selecting Superfund Remedial Actions
  Order Number PB90-273863CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Emergency and Remedial Response; Apr 90
  The fact  sheet describes  the statutory  requirements for
  CERCLA remedies at hazardous waste sites and the process
  EPA has established in the 1990 revised National Contingen-
                                                                                                             205

-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: RI/FS & RODS
Process
  cy Plan (NCP) for meeting those requirements. This process
  is a general framework for reaching a judgement as to the
  most appropriate method of achieving protection of human
  health and the environment at a particular site.
  Specifications:  9p.
  Subject Index keywords: Guidelines, Hazardous materials,
  Superfund,  Remedial action, Waste management, Office of
  Solid Waste and Emergency Response.

1101  Management Systems Review of the Superfund Rl/
  FS: Opportunities for Streamlining
  Ordeir Number PB90-264136CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
  Research Triangle Inst, Research Triangle Park, NC.;
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Quality
  Assurance Management Staff; c1990
  The Management Systems Review (MSR) is an important
  component of EPA's quality assurance  program to assess
  the effectiveness of environmental data  operations and the
  quality assurance/quality control activities  designed to sup-
  port those operations. MSRs inform managers about aspects
  of the environmental data operation  that  are working well
  and those which may warrant  some improvement. A recent
  review of  the  Superfund remedial  investigation/feasibility
  study  (RI/FS) has shown that the MSR  is an excellent tool
  for providing a systematic definition of complex environmen-
  tal data operations and for enabling a thorough  analysis of
  these operations. The MSR  utilized  information gathered
  from interviews of Regional personnel  and from case studies
  of recently completed Rl/FSs. The findings indicated that en-
  vironmental data play an important role in  most  RI/FS deci-
  sions and that thorough and structured scoping  is critical to
  the effectiveness of the RI/FS. Analysis of the RI/FS proc-
  ess Using a comprehensive flow diagram  identified  several
  opportunities for changes that  may  increase efficiency in
  data collection and the reliability of RI/FS decisions. These
  changes  provide for  more effective  scoping activities,  a
  streamlined feasibility study, and increased use of treatability
  studies during the Rl. A pilot demonstration of these process
  changes is being planned  for  a Regional RI/FS. (Copyright
  (c) 1990-Air and Waste Management Association.)
  Specifications:   Pub.  in Jnl. of the Air  and Work Manage-
  ment Association, v40 n5 p753-737 May 90. Sponsored by
  Environmental Protection  Agency, Washington,  DC. Quality
  Assurance Management Staff. 7p.
  Subject index keywords: Waste management,  Superfund,
  Remedial action.
1102  Performance of Risk Assessments in Remedial
  Investigation/Feasibility Studies (Rl/FSs) Conducted by
  Potentially Responsible Parties (PRPs)
  Order Number PB91-139493CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 28 Aug 90
  The purpose of the directive is to provide initial guidance on
  implementing the recent decision that in the future  EPA will
  develop all risk assessments for sites remediated  under
  CERGLA. It focuses on the applicability of  the decision to
  new and existing orders or decrees for Rl/FSs conducted by
  PRPs.,In essence,  EPA or a State (whose oversight of the
  PRP is Federally funded) will develop the risk assessment for
  all new  orders or decrees. For existing orders  or decrees
  that specify that the PRP prepares the risk assessment, the
  PRP will be given an  opportunity under the terms of the
  order or decree to  complete an  acceptable risk  assessment
  under stringent oversight and without undue delay. The term
  'risk assessment' in the directive is meant to include environ-
  mental  assessments  as well  as  assessments  of risks  to
  human health.
  Specifications:  8p.
  Subject index keywords:  Superfund, Waste management,
  Hazardous materials, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
  Response.

1103  Presumptive Remedies: Policy and Procedures
  Order Number PB93-963345CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Sep 93
  The objective of the presumptive remedies  initiative is to use
  the  program's past experience to streamline  site investiga-
  tions and speed up selection of cleanup actions. Over time
  presumptive remedies are expected to  ensure  consistency in
  remedy selection and reduce the cost and time required to
  clean up similar types of sites.  Presumptive remedies are ex-
  pected  to be used at all appropriate sites  except under un-
  usual site-specific circumstances.  EPA plans to develop  a
  series of directives on presumptive  remedies  for various
  types of sites. The directive serves as an overall guide to the
  presumptive remedies initiative and its effect on site cleanup.
  Through a question and  answer format, it explains, in general
  terms, ways in which presumptive remedies will streamline or
  change the remedial and removal processes  from the con-
  ventional processes and how certain Superfund  policies will
  be affected by the initiative.
  Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
  posit account required (minimum deposit  $200 U.S., Canada,
  and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
  paper copy or microfiche. 8p.
  Subject index keywords:  Superfund,  Government policies,
  Administrative procedures.

1104  Presumptive Remedies: Site Characterization and
  Technology Selection for  CERCLA Sites  with Volatile
  Organic Compounds in Soils
  Order Number PB93-963346CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Sep 93
  Presumptive   remedies   are  preferred  technologies  for
  common categories of sites, based  on historical patterns of
  remedy selection and EPA's scientific  and  engineering eval-
  uation of performance data on technology implementation.
  The directive identifies  the  presumptive  remedies for Com-
  prehensive Environmental Response, Compensation,  and Li-
  ability Act (CERCLA) sites with soils  contaminated by volatile
  organic  compounds (VOCs).  Soil  vapor  extraction   (SVE),
  thermal  desorption,  and incineration  are  the presumptive
  remedies for Superfund  sites with VOC-contaminated soil as-
  suming the site characteristics  meet certain criteria.
  Specifications: Paper copy available on  Standing Order, de-
  posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
  and Mexico;  all others $400). Single copies also available  in
  paper copy or microfiche. 26p.
  Subject index keywords:  Site characterization, Technology
  assessment, Soil contamination, Superfund.
206

-------
                                                                  PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION; RI/FS & RODS
                                                                                                         Process
 1105  Presumptive Remedy for CERCLA Municipal Landfill
  Sites
  Order Number PB93-963339CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Sep 93
  The directive establishes containment as the presumptive
  remedy for CERCLA municipal landfills. The framework for
  the presumptive  remedy for these  sites  is presented in  a
  streamlining manual entitled Conducting Remedial  Investiga-
  tions/Feasibility Studies for CERCLA Municipal Landfill Sites,
  February 1991 (OSWER Directive 9355. 3-11). The directive
  highlights and emphasizes the importance of certain stream-
  lining principles related to the scoping (planning) stages of
  the remedial investigation/feasibility  study (RI/FS) that were
  identified in the manual. The directive also provides clarifica-
  tion of and  additional guidance in the following areas: (1) the
  level of detail appropriate for risk assessment  of  source
  areas at municipal landfills and (2) the characterization of hot
  spots.
  Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing  Order, de-
  posit account  required (minimum deposit $200  U.S., Canada,
  and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
  paper copy  or microfiche. 15p.
  Subject index keywords: Superfund, Landfills, Remediation.

 1106  Remedial Investigation: Site Characterization and
  Treatability Studies
  Order Number PB90-274408CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington,  DC. Office of
  Emergency  and Remedial Response; Nov 89
  The fact sheet summarizes Chapters 3 and 5 of the 'Interim
  Final Guidance for Conducting Remedial  Investigations and
  Feasibility Studies Under CERCLA.' The document also dis-
  cusses site characteristics and treatability studies, and in-
  cludes  information on how to manage these aspects of the
  Rl.
  Specifications:  7p.
  Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste treat-
  ment, Superfund,  Waste management, Office of Solid  Waste
  and Emergency Response, Remedial action.

1107 Revisions to OMB Circular A-94 on Guidelines  and
  Discount Rates for Benefit-Cost Analysis
  Order Number PB93-963297CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Emergency and Remedial Response; 25 Jun 93
  The memorandum revises the discount rate used in cost esti-
  mation  for  Superfund activities to 7%. This discount rate
  should  be used in  estimating the present worth value for po-
  tential  alternatives in the  remedial investigation/feasibility
  study and for remedial actions.
  Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
  posit account required (minimum deposit $225 U.S., Canada,
  and Mexico; all others $450).  Single  copies also available in
  paper copy or  microfiche. See also PB89-184626. 31 p.
  Subject index keywords: Superfund,  Hazardous  materials,
  Waste disposal, Interest rate.

1108  RI/FS Improvements
  Order Number PB90-272642CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
  Environmental  Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Emergency and Remedial Response;  23 Jul 87
  The directive identifies methods of reducing overall project
  schedules and costs while retaining  a  quality product. Four
   major points are included: phased Remedial Investigations/
   Feasibility Studies (RI/FS),  streamlined project  planning,
   management of handoffs, and Remedial Investigation/Feasi-
   bility Study (RI/FS) control reviews.
   Specifications: 14p.
   Subject index keywords: Superfund, Office of Solid Waste
   and Emergency Response.

 1109  RI/FS Improvements Follow-Up
   Order Number PB90-249657CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
   Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
   Emergency and Remedial Response; 25 Apr  88
   The reports directive delineates improvements developed for
   more effective  Remedial  Investigations/Feasibility Studies
   (RI/FS).
   Specifications: 18p.
   Subject  index keywords:  Hazardous  materials, Project
   management, Superfund, Remedial investigations.

 1110  RI/FS Streamlining
   Order Number PB91-214981CDH, price:-PC A04/MF A01
   Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
   Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 14 Feb 89
   The directive presents a second set of recommendations for
   streamlining measures that will reduce the cost and duration
   of RI/FS's. Recommendations include those related to tech-
   nical issues, procurement enhancement,  program  manage-
   ment, State coordination and enforcement.
   Specifications:  51 p.
   Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
   Hazardous materials,  Office of Solid Waste  and Emergency
   Response.

 1111  ROD Annual Report, FY 1989
   Order Number PB90-258484CDH, price: PC A17/MF A02
   Environmental Protection  Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
   Emergency and Remedial Response; Apr 90
  Provides the Regions and Headquarters with summary  data
  on FY 89 Records  of Decision (RODs), and consists of the
  following sections: Introduction - highlights  specific accom-
  plishments in the  ROD  process; ROD Summaries ~ de-
  scribes site conditions and key contaminants, selected reme-
  dial actions,  specific remedy performance  standards  and
  goals, and institutional controls for each FY  89 ROD; FY 89
  ROD Summary  Table -  summarizes. all  remedial  actions,
  capital operation and  maintenance costs, and contaminated
  media; FY 82-FY 88 ROD Summary Table - summarizes all
  RODs from FY 82 through FY 88; ROD Keyword List ~ pro-
  vides major keyword categories and their subcategories for
  all RODs approved to date.   '
  Specifications:  See also report for FY88, PB89-235212.
  379p.
  Subject index  keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste dis-
  posal, Waste treatment, Superfund, Remedial action, Record
  of decision.

1112  ROD Annual Report, FY 1990
  Order Number PB91-921277CDH, price: PC A24/MF A03
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Emergency and Remedial Response; Jul 91
  The report presents the  Regional  arid Headquarters  staff
  with summary data on RODs. The report features specific ac-
  complishments  in  the ROD process  and summarizes the
                                                                                                             207

-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: RI/FS & RODS
Process
  year's RODs by describing site conditions and key contami-
  nants, selected  remedial actions,  specific remedy perform-
  ance standards and goals, and institutional controls.
  Specifications: Pager copy available on Standing Order, de-
  posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
  and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
  paper copy or microfiche. See also PB90-258484. 557p.
  Subject Index keywords: Groundwater, Hazardous  materi-
  als, Waste disposal, Superfund.
1113  ROD Annual Report, FY1991. Volume 1
  Order Number PB92-963359CDH, price: PC$77.00
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Emergency and Remedial Response; Apr 92
  The ROD Annual Report FY 1991 is a reference publication
  designed to provide Headquarters, Regions, and the public
  with summary information on Superfund RODs. RODs docu-
  ment the remedy decision for a site or operable unit. RODs
  certify that the  remedy selection  process followed  require-
  ments of CERCLA, and discuss the major technical  compo-
  nents of the remedy. Volume 1  highlights specific information
  about the  RODs signed during FY  1991. It includes  exhibits
  of the types of  RODs, treatment vs. containment remedies,
  treatment technologies used for remedies, treatment trains,
  and estimates for remedy costs. ROD abstracts and  a list of
  RODs signed in FY 1991 describe  site history, key contami-
  nants, the selected remedial action, performance standards,
  institutional controls, and estimated cost for each remedy.
  Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
  posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
  and Mexico;  all others $400). Single copies also available in
  paper copy or microfiche. See  also Volume 2, PB92-963360
  andPB91-921277. 652p.
  Subject Index keywords: Ground  water,  Hazardous materi-
  als, Waste disposal, Superfund.
1114  ROD Annual Report, FY1991. Volume 2
  Order Number PB92-963360CDH, price: PC A18/MF  A04
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Emergency and Remedial Response; Apr 92
  The ROD Annual Report FY 1991  is a reference publication
  designed to  provide Headquarters, Regions,  and  the public
  with summary information on Superfund RODs. This  year the
  report is in two volumes. Volume 2 contains the FY 1982  -
  1990 ROD Summary Table which lists the remedial action
  site name and date of ROD signature,  and summarizes the
  threat or problem, waste volume components of the  selected
  remedy, cleanup goals,  and estimated costs for each FY
  1982 - 1990 ROD. Volume 2  also contains a list of RODs
  signed to date, a keyword list for all FY 1982 -1990  RODs, a
  list of ROD Amendments, and  a list of ROD Explanations of
  Significant Differences.
  Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
  posit account required  (minimum deposit $200 U.S.,  Canada,
  and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
  paper copy or microfiche. See also Volume 1, PB92-963359
  and PB91-921277. 406p.
  Subject Index keywords: Ground water, Hazardous materi-
  als. Waste disposal, Superfund, Record of Decision.
1115  ROD Annual Report, FY 1992
  Order Number PB93-963349CDH, price: PC A22/MF A04
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Emergency and Remedial Response; Dec 93
  The Records of Decision (RODs) highlighted in the  annual
  report document compliance with SARA mandates for the re-
  medial  program  in FY 1992. One hundred  sixty-four (164)
  RODs and eight (8) ROD Amendments, including Fund-lead,
  Enforcement, and Federal Facility RODs were signed during
  FY 1992. The lead breakdown for the RODs is as follows: 53
  Fund-lead plus 65 Enforcement-lead,  equals 118; 118 plus
  46 Federal Facility-lead equals 164 RODs. The eight Amend-
  ments consist of 3 Fund-lead and 5 Enforcement-lead RODs.
  119 of the 172 RQDs addressed source control remediation,
  and 28  RODs addressed ground-water-only remediation. The
  remaining 25 RODs were no action/no further action reme-
  dies. Of the total 119 source control RODs, 85 addressed  a
  final  source  control  remedy, and 34  addressed an  interim
  source  control remedy. 78 of the 119 source control  RODs
  selected both source control and ground water remediation
  components.
  Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
  posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
  and Mexico;  all others $400). Single copies also available in
  paper copy or microfiche. See also PB92-963359 and PB92-
  963360. 516p.
  Subject index keywords: Superfund,  Remedial action, Haz-
  ardous  materials, Record of Decision.

1116   Role of Expedited Response Actions under SARA
  Order Number PB91-214221CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Emergency and Remedial Response; 21 Apr 87
  The  directive serves as a follow-up to OSWER Directive
  9360.0-10 (July  8, 1986) entitled 'Expedited Response Ac-
  tions,' and updates the basic tenets of expedited response
  actions (ERAs) and their role in the Superfund Remedial Pro-
  gram.
  Specifications:  Portions of this document are not fully legi-
  ble. 13p.
  Subject index keywords:  Superfund, Waste management,
  Hazardous materials, Office of Solid Waste  and Emergency
  Response.
1117  Scoper's Notes: An RI/FS Costing Guide. Bringing in
  a Quality RI/FS on Time and Within  Budget
  Order Number PB90-258369CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Feb 90
  The  guide outlines the tasks and sub-tasks typically conduct-
  ed as part of a  Remedial Investigation/Feasibility Study (Rl/
  FS), and presents a strate  gy based on site complexity and
  task difficulty for estimating a project's cost. It provides cost
  guidelines which can be used  to estimate funding needs  in
  advance of  issuing  work assignments and  evaluating con-
  tractor  proposals.
  Specifications:  29p.
  Subject index  keywords: Guidelines, Cost estimates, Re-
  medial  action, Superfund, Waste management.
 208

-------
                                                                            PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: R1VBA
  1118  Streamlining the RI/FS for CERCLA Municipal
   Landfill Sites
   Order Number PB90-274424CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
   Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
   Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 90
   The fact sheet discusses streamlining the RI/FS for munici-
   pal landfills with respect to site characterization, risk assess-
   ment, and the development of remedial action alternatives.
   Streamlining is possible since approximately 20% of the sites
   on the NPL are municipal landfills which typically share simi-
   lar characteristics.
   Specifications:  7p.
   Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Earth fills
   Superfund, Waste management, Office of Solid Waste and
   Emergency Response, Remedial action.

 1119  Streamlining the RI/FS for CERCLA Municipal
   Landfill Sites
   Order Number PB91-921301CDH, price: PC A01/MF A01
   Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
   Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 90
   Approximately 20 percent of the sites on the National Prior-
   ities List (NPL) are municipal landfills which typically share
   similar characteristics.  Because of the similarity the Super-
   fund  Program anticipates that their remediation will involve
   similar waste management approaches. As stated in the Na-
   tional Contingency Plan, EPA expects that containment tech-
   nologies will generally be appropriate for waste that  poses a
   relatively low long-term threat or where treatment is impracti-
   cable  (Sec. 300.430(a)(1)(iii)(B),55FR8846(March 8,  1990)).
   In addition, EPA expects treatment to be considered for iden-
   tifiable areas of highly toxic and/or mobile material that con-
   stitute the  principal  threat(s)  posed  by  the site  (Sec
   300.430(a)(1)(iii)(A)). The similarity  in landfill characteristics
   and the NCP expectations make it possible to streamline the
   RI/FS for municipal  landfills with respect to site characteriza-
   tion, risk assessment, and the development  of  remedial
   action  alternatives. The fact sheet outlines available stream-
   lining  techniques for each of these three phases of an Rl/
   FS. Additional information, including tools to assist in  scoping
   activities, will be included in the document Conducting Re-
   medial Investigations/Feasibility Studies for CERCLA Munici-
   pal Landfill Sites (November 1990, Directive No. 9355.3-11).
  The document will be available from the Center for Environ-
   mental Research Information  (FTS 684-7562  or 513-569-
  7562).
  Specifications: Paper  copy available on Standing Order de-
  posit account required  (minimum deposit $150 U.S., Canada,
  and Mexico; all others  $300). Single copies also available in
  paper copy or microfiche. 5p.
  Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
  Remedial action,  Municipal wastes, Earth fills, Office of Solid
  Waste  and  Emergency Response, Comprehensive Environ-
  mental Response Compensation and Liability Act.

1120  Structure and Components of Five-Year Reviews
  Order Number PB91-921368CDH, price: PC A01/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Emergency and Remedial Response; Aug 91
  The fact sheet provides guidance for planning and conduct-
  ing five-year reviews. These include:  initiation and termination
  of reviews; responsibilities and funding; content; and docu-
  menting results of reviews. The goal of this fact sheet is to
  help assure that  reviews are implemented in  a consistent
   manner nationally, with appropriate consideration of local
   concerns and widely varying site conditions.
   Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
   posit account required (minimum deposit $150 U.S., Canada,
   and Mexico; all others $300). Single copies also available in
   paper copy or microfiche. 3p.
   Subject index keywords: Waste disposal, Hazardous mate-
   rials, Superfund.

 1121  Structure and Components of Five-Year Reviews
   Order Number PB91-921369CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
   Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
   Emergency and Remedial Response; May 91
   The directive provides guidance primarily on the implementa-
   tion of five-year reviews and the issues associated with im-
   plementation. These include: triggering points for reviews, re-
   sponsibilities and funding, content, and results of reviews.
   The goal of this directive is to assure that reviews are imple-
   mented in a consistent manner nationally, with appropriate
   consideration of local concerns and widely varying site condi-
   tions.
   Specifications:  Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
   posit account required (minimum deposit $150 U.S., Canada,
   and Mexico; all others $300). Single copies also available in
   paper copy or microfiche. 16p.
   Subject index  keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste dis-
   posal, Superfund.

 1122  Technology Selection Guide for Wood Treater Sites
   Order Number PB93-963329CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
   Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
   Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 26 May 93
  The purpose of the memorandum is to transmit the Technol-
  ogy Selection Guide for Wood Treater Sites. The fact sheet
  is  part of a  series of guidance documents being developed
  on presumptive remedies at various categories of sites. The
  technology selection guide provides information  on specific
  technologies and performance data. The information includes
  a procedural outline, practical considerations, and treatment
  technology tables for sludge, soil, sediment, and ground and
  surface water.
  Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
  posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
  and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
  paper copy or microfiche. 10p.
  Subject index keywords: Superfund,  Wood preservatives,
  Waste disposal,  Pollution control.


PROGRAM  IMPLEMENTATION: RD/
RA

1123  Cost Estimating Systems for Remedial Action
  Projects
  Order Number PB91-231191CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk
  Reduction Engineering Lab.; Corps of Engineers, Omaha,
  NE. Missouri River Div; 1991
  The paper details the  ongoing  collaboration between  the
  U.S. EPA and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers in the devel-
  opment of complementary microcomputer based cost esti-
  mating systems for hazardous waste remediations. The U.S.
                                                                                                              209

-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: RD/RA
  EPA system,  'Remedial  Action Cost  Estimating System'
  (RACES), is a technology based application. Estimates gen-
  erated  by RACES are based upon cost  engineering relation-
  ships, the estimates are designed for use in the early stages
  of remediation design. The U.S. Army  Corps of Engineers
  system, 'Micro-Computer  Aided Cost Engineering System'
  (M-CACES), is a  'bottoms-up' system for  use in situations
,  where  detailed design information  is available. While both
  systems will stand alone,  they have been designed to allow
  the transfer of estimates  generated by  RACES directly into
  the M-CACES system.
  Specifications: Prepared in cooperation with Corps of Engi-
  neers,  Omaha, NE. Missouri River Div. 6p.
  Subject Index keywords: Remedial  action, Cost estimates,
  Hazardous materials, Waste management, Superfund, Reme-
  dial  Action Cost Estimating System, Micro-Computer Aided
  Cost Engineering System.
 1124  EPA Oversight of Remedial Designs and Remedial
  Actions performed by PRPs
  Order Number PB91-921357CDH, price:  PC A02/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Emergency and Remedial Response;  Feb 90
  The Fact Sheet presents  an overview of EPA's guidance for
  oversight of enforcement  lead projects in which a Potentially
  Responsible Party (PRP) conducts the Remedial Design (RD)
  and Remedial Action (RA). PRP oversight is to ensure that
  selected remedies are protective of public health and the en-
  vironment and are in compliance with the Settlement Agree-
  merit.  For further  information, refer to Interim Final Guidance
  on EPA Oversight of  Remedial Designs and Remedial  Ac-
  tions Performed by  Potentially Responsible Parties,  OSWER
  Directive 9355.5-Q1, February 1990.
  Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
  posit account required (minimum deposit $150 U.S., Canada,
  and Mexico; all others $300). Single  copies also available  in
   paper  copy or microfiche. 8p.
  Subject index keywords: Superfund,  Waste management,
   Hazardous materials, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
   Response.
 1125  EPA/U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Payment
   Process, Direct Cite/Revised Reimbursement Methods
   Order  Number PB91-921347CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
   Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
   Emergency and Remedial Response; 21 Mar 90
   The directive transmits new procedures for the disbursement
   of funds to the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USAGE) under
   EPA lead Superfund projects.
   Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order," de-
   posit account required (minimum deposit $150 U.S., Canada,
   and Mexico; all others $300). Single copies also available  in
   paper copy or microfiche. 7p.
   Subject index keywords: Superfund,  Waste  management,
   Hazardous materials, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
   Response.
 1126 EPA/USACE Payment Process: Direct Cite/Revised
   Reimbursement Methods
   Order Number PB90-273897CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
   Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
   Emergency and Remedial Response; May 90
   The fact sheet announces a new procedure for paying the
   U.S. Army Corps of Engineers for their  Superfund related ac-
 tivities. It describes  the current procedure and outlines the
 changes the Office of Emergency and Remedial Response,
 Office of  the  Comptroller,  Office  of Administration  and
 USAGE are implementing.
 Specifications: 7p.
 Subject index  keywords: Hazardous materials, Salary ad-
 ministration, Superfund, Office of Solid Waste and Emergen-
 cy Response, Army Corps of Engineers, Waste management,
 Reimbursements.
1127  Expediting Remedial Construction
 Order Number PB90-272683CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
 Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
 Emergency and Remedial Response; Oct 89
 The fact sheet examines activities to be considered in Reme-
 dial Management Strategies to accelerate remedial  construc-
 tion.
 Specifications: 9p.
 Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Construction
  management,   Superfund,  Remedial action,  Preremedial
 action, Waste management, Office of Solid Waste and Emer-
  gency Response.
1128  Guidance on EPA Oversight of Remedial Designs
  and Remedial Actions Performed by Potentially
  Responsible Parties
  Order Number PB90-226069CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Emergency and Remedial Response; Apr 90
  The Interim Final Guidance on EPA Oversight of  Remedial
  Designs and Remedial Actions Performed by Potentially Re-
  sponsible Parties was issued in order to ensure that selected
  remedies being conducted are protective of public health and
  the environment, and that the Remedial  Actions are in com-
  pliance with the  applicable performance  standards. It pro-
  vides guidance for  oversight when  EPA  is the lead agency
  on  a project in which a Potentially  Responsible Party con-
  ducts the Remedial Design and Remedial Action.  The  guid-
  ance does hot cover projects when the Remedial Design and
  Remedial  Action is performed with Superfund  monies  in
  which the  EPA or the State is the lead agency. This will be
  the subject of future guidance documents.
  Specifications: 56p.
  Subject index keywords: Guidelines, Hazardous materials,
  Project management, Remedial action, Cleanup operations,
  Superfund.
 1129  Guidance on Expediting Remedial  Design and
  Remedial Action
  Order Number PB90-273871CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Emergency and Remedial Response; Aug 90
  This document examines ways to expedite remedial design
  and remedial action so that cleanup activities can be com-
  pleted more quickly. Intended for  use  by remedial project
  managers, remedial design contractors, and others involved
  in  planning remediation activities.  It should  be used as a
  means to  evaluate  whether a project is  suited for expediting
  and to determine the methods that could  be used.
  Specifications: 57p.
  Subject index keywords: Guidelines, Hazardous  materials,
  Superfund, Remedial designs, Remedial  action, Waste man-
  agement.
  210

-------
                                                                           PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: RD7RA
 1130  Guidance on Oversight of PRP Performed RD/RA
   Order Number PB90-249707CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
   Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
   Emergency and Remedial Response; 14 Feb 90
   The directive provides interim  final guidance on EPA over-
   sight of Remedial  Designs (RD) and Remedial Actions  (RA)
   performed  by Potentially Responsible Parties (PRP). Insures
   that remedies being conducted  by PRPs are protective of the
   public health and  environment, and are in compliance  with
   applicable performance standards.
   Specifications: 56p.
   Subject  index keywords:  Regulations,  Supervision, Guid-
   ance, Superfund, Remedial action, Office of Solid Waste and
   Emergency Response, Remedial designs, Potentially respon-
   sible parties.

 1131  Procedure for Use of USAGE  Preplaced Contracts
   to Expedite Superfund Cleanup Tasks
   Order Number PB94-963243CDH, price: Standing Order call
   for price
   Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
   Emergency and Remedial Response; Apr 94
   The  U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USAGE) has procured
   preplaced indefinite delivery  contracts to  provide the EPA
  with  streamlined,  flexible access to  engineering, removal,
  and remedial services at selected Superfund sites. The docu-
  ment describes each contract in terms of scope, applicability,
  criteria for use, response time, and procedures for accessing
  the contract;
  Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
  posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
  and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
  paper copy and microfiche. 4p.
  Subject index keywords:  Corps of Engineers,  Superfund,
  Contract management.

1132  Procuring Innovative Technologies at Remedial
  Sites: Q's and A's and Case Studies
  Order Number PB92-232388CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Apr 92
  The fact sheet is designed to assist EPA Remedial Project
  Managers (RPMs)  and Contracting Officers (CDs) with  the
  procurement of  innovative  treatment  technologies. RPMs,
  COs, and U.S. Army Corps  of  Engineers (COE)  personnel
  were interviewed to obtain information on their experiences
  in procuring innovative technologies. EPA's Technology Inno-
  vation  Office (TlO)has documented case histories of exper-
  ences  with acquiring innovative  technologies in the Super-
  fund program. Remedial  sites chosen  for inclusion in the
  review were Fund-lead  sites  that had started or completed
 the procurement of an innovative technology, including biore-
  mediation, thermal  desorption, vacuum extraction, chemical
 treatment, chemical extraction, and in situ  soil flushing. The
 results of these interviews are presented in a question and
 answer  format  In addition, specific detailed information  on
 each site is presented in tabular form.
 Specifications: 24p.
 Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste treat-
 ment, Superfund.
 1133   Real Estate Acquisition Procedures for USAGE
   Projects
   Order Number PB91 -921355CDH, price: PC A01 /MF A01
   Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
   Emergency and Remedial Response; Feb 90
   The USACE, because of extensive experience in real estate
   activities is an appropriate supporting agency for Superfund
   cleanup when a health based relocation is not required. EPA
   is authorized  to acquire  by purchase,  lease, donation,  con-
   demnation, or otherwise any real property needed to conduct
   a remedial action. The fact sheet addresses the areas of ini-
   tial planning,  request and approval process, acquisition, sum-
   mary of the major roles and responsibilities, and the timeta-
   ble for 104(j)  acquisitions. The role of the Remedial Project
   Manager (RPMs) is discussed.
   Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
   posit account required (minimum deposit $150 U.S., Canada,
   and Mexico; all others $300). Single copies also available in
   paper copy or microfiche. 5p.
   Subject index keywords: Superfund,  Waste management,
   Hazardous materials, Real estate, Office of Solid Waste and
   Emergency Response.

 1134  Remedial Action Report: Documentation for
   Operable Unit Completion
   Order Number PB92-963364CDH, price: PC A01/MF A01
   Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
   Emergency and Remedial Response; Jun 92
   The progress  in moving a site toward the ultimate goal of de-
   letion from  the NPL typically involves several operable units
   or multiple  phases of construction over a period of  several
   years. The purpose of the Remedial Action Report is to doc-
   ument the activities that occur under each specific remedial
   action operable unit at a site. The report provides documen-
  tation that a particular operable unit has met its objectives as
  well as summary information for subsequent  inclusion in the
  Superfund Site Close Out Report. It also serves as a source
  of lessons  learned for  project managers and designers of
  future remedial action projects.
  Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
  posit account  required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
  and Mexico; all others $400).  Single copies also available in
  paper copy or microfiche. 4p.
  Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
  Hazardous materials,  Office of Solid Waste  and Emergency
  Response.

1135  Remedial Action, Treatment, and Disposal of
  Hazardous Waste. Proceedings of the Annual Hazardous
  Waste Research Symposium (17th). Held in Cincinnati,
  Ohio on April 9-11, 1991
  Order Number PB91-233627CDH, price: PC$84.00
  JACA Corp., Fort Washington,  PA.; Science Applications
  International Corp., Cincinnati, OH.*Environmental Protection
  Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk Reduction Engineering Lab; Apr
  y i
  The Seventeenth Annual RREL Research Symposium  on Re-
  medial Action,  Treatment and  Disposal of Hazardous  Waste
 was held in Cincinnati, Ohio, April 9-11, 1991. The purpose
 of the Symposium  was to present the latest significant  re-
 search  findings from ongoing  and  recently  completed
 projects funded by the Risk Reduction Engineering Laborato-
 ry (RREL). These Proceedings are  organized  in three sec-
                                                                                                             211

-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: RD/RA
  tions: Sessions A and B consist of paper presentations. Ses-
  sion C contains the poster abstracts. Subjects include reme-
  dial action treatment and control technologies for waste dis-
  posal, landfill  liner and cover systems, underground storage
  tanks, and demonstration and development of innovative/al-
  ternative treatment technologies for hazardous waste. Alter-
  native technology  subjects  include thermal  destruction  of
  hazardous wastes, field evaluations,  existing treatment op-
  tions,  emerging  treatment processes,  waste minimization,
  and biosystems for hazardous waste destruction.
  Specifications:  See also PB91-148379. Prepared in coop-
  eration with Science Applications International Corp., Cincin-
  nati,  OH.  Sponsored by Environmental Protection  Agency,
  Cincinnati, OH. Risk Reduction Engineering Lab. 708p.
  Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste treat-
  ment, Waste disposal, Remedial action, Meetings, Research
  and development.

 1136 Super-fund Remedial Action Decision Process:
  Database for Selected FY87 Records of Decision
  Order Number DE89010163CDH, price: PC A06/MF A01
  Oak Ridge National Labi, TN.; Department of Energy,
  Washington, DC; 1989
  This report was  prepared by Oak  Ridge National Laborato-
  ry's Office of Risk Analysis (ORNL/ORA) for the Regulatory
  Integration Division of EPA's Office of Policy Analysis (OPA).
  The  purpose of  the  report is to present data  compiled  for
  analysis of the Superfund decision-making process and char-
  acterization of the role of risk assessment in this  process.
  Data presented are compiled from FY87 Records of Decision
  (RODs) and  their corresponding  support documents. The
  present report includes data from a total of 50 RODs from all
  EPA regions. These data are summarized and analyzed in a
  complementary report (Doty and Travis, 1989). In  addition,
  although no computerized database has been developed, the
  data presented will be useful for addressing further research
  questions related to  the Superfund remedial action decision
  process. (ERA citation 14:025341)
  Specifications:  Portions of this document are illegible  in
  microfiche products. 106p.
  Subject index keywords: Ground Water, Superfund, Reme-
  dial  Action,  Risk Assessment, Waste disposal,  Water pollu-
  tion.
 1137  Superfund  Remedial Program Financial Management
  Authority, Responsibilities and Procedures
  Order Number PB91-214106CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
   Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
   Emergency and  Remedial Response; 21 Sep 84
  The directive discusses the Superfund delegations approved
   April 16, 1984, the Regional Offices have additional authority
   and responsibilities  for significant portions  of the remedial
   program. This includes both programmatic and administrative
   authority and responsibilities,  described in detail in the vari-
   ous Superfund  remedial program guidance packages,  and
   specific financial management authority, responsibilities and
   procedures described in the document.
   Specifications:  28p.
   Subject index  keywords: Superfund, Waste  management,
   Hazardous materials, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
   Response.
1138  U.S. Bureau of Reclamation Assistance to the
  Superfund Program
  Order Number PB91-921319CDH, price: PC A01/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Emergency and Remedial Response; Dec 90
  The fact sheet outlines assistance available from the Depart-
  ment of the Interior's Bureau of Reclamation's Denver Office
  and the five Regional Offices. Reclamation has developed
  expertise in  total  project  management,  including planning,
  engineering design, research, construction management, and
  in project operation and maintenance. Under an Interagency
  Agreement (IAG) entitled 'Superfund Management and Sup-
  port Activities,' funding has been authorized for a number of
  activities relating to Reclamation's  assistance  in Superfund.
  Specifications:  Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
  posit account required (minimum deposit $150 U.S., Canada,
  and Mexico; all  others $300). Single copies also available in
  paper copy or microfiche. 5p.
  Subject index  keywords: Superfund, Waste  management,
  Hazardous materials,  Bureau of Reclamation, Office of Solid
  Waste  and Emergency Response.
 1139   USAGE Preplaced and Rapid Response Contracts
  Order Number PB90-273889CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Emergency and  Remedial Response; Dec 89
  The  fact sheet describes the  Preplaced  Remedial Action
  (PRA)  and Rapid Response (RR) programs and contracts.  It
  includes an overview of the contract processes, the  roles
  and  responsibilities of USAGE and EPA, and resource and
  contract management.
  Specifications: 6p.
  Subject  index keywords:  Hazardous materials,  Project
  management, Contract administration, Superfund,  Remedial
  action,  Office  of  Solid Waste and Emergency Response,
  Waste management.
 1140  Use of Removal Approaches to Speed Up Remedial
  Action Projects
  Order  Number PB90-274382CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Emergency and Remedial Response; 7 Jul 89
  The directive defines the basic requirements to be met when
  a Region chooses to use removal authorities and contracting
  methods to  speed up remedial projects on  National Priorities
  List (NPL) sites where surface cleanups  may result in a total
  site cleanup or  completion of a major portion of the site.
  Specifications: 10p.
  Subject index  keywords: Hazardous materials,  Superfund,
  Waste management, Office of  Solid Waste and Emergency
   Response, Remedial action.
 1141  Use of Time and Materials and Cost Reimbursement
   Subcontracts for Remedial Actions under the Alternative
   Remedial Contracting Strategy Contracts
   Order Number PB93-963282CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
   Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
   Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 29 Jul 92
   The directive is intended  to establish agency guidance on
   the use of time and materials and cost reimbursement con-
   tracts for remedial actions in general and to provide specific
   instruction regarding the use of these approaches in subcon-
 212

-------
                                                             PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: RQ's & Continuous
                                                                                                        Release
   tracting under the Alternative Remedial Contracting Strategy
   (ARCS) contracts.
   Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
   posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada
   and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
   paper copy or microfiche. 6p.
   Subject  index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
   Hazardous materials, Office of Solid  Waste and Emergency
   Response, Altrnative Remedial Contracting Strategy.


 PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION:  RQ's

 & Continuous Release

 1142  Assessing Reports of Continuous Releases of
   Hazardous Substances: A Guide for EPA Regions
   Order Number P891-921315CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
   Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
   Emergency and Remedial Response; Oct 90
   Reporting continuous releases of hazardous substances that
   equal or exceed a reportable quantity (RQ)  has been  re-
   quired under the Comprehensive Environmental Response,
   Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA) since its enact-
   ment in 1980. Section 103(f)(2) of CERCLA provides that re-
   leases of hazardous substances that are  continuous  and
   stable in  quantity and  rate may be  reported  annually or
   whenever there is a statistically significant increase (SSI).
   The  purpose of the guidance document is to provide assist-
   ance to the EPA Regions by discussing and making  recom-
   mendations regarding the options available for evaluating re-
  ports of continuous releases. The effective implementation of
  the continuous release reporting regulation will  depend large-
  ly on whether the EPA Regions are able to fully and easily
  evaluate the continuous release reports they receive.
  Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
  posit account required (minimum deposit $200  U.S., Canada
  and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also  available iri
  paper copy or microfiche. 18p.
  Subject index  keywords:  Hazardous materials,  Guidelines
  Reporting requirements,  Superfund,  US EPA Regions 1-10,
  Comprehensive Environmental  Response Compensation and
  Liability Act, Superfund.

1143  Continuous Release-Emergency Response
  Notification System and Priority Assessment Model:
  Model Documentation
  Order Number PB91-168468CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Emergency and Remedial Response; 13 Feb 91
  The purpose of the model documentation is to  provide a de-
  tailed description of the modeling and risk analysis proce-
  dures used in CR-ERNS/PAM to assist OSCs and other Su-
  perfund decision-makers in  interpreting the system results.
  PAM  is a  screening-level model; to properly interpret PAM's
  outputs, the user must understand the  limitations  and uncer-
  tainties in  the equations and data used to generate these re-
  sults.  Chapter 2 presents the  system's fate  and transport
  models and describes the assumptions associated with these
  equations. Chapter 3  describes PAM's auxiliary data  bases
  and provides the source(s) of each parameter and the meth-
  ods by which values were selected. Chapter 4 explains the
  methods and exposure assumptions used to estimate expo-
  sures  to hazardous substances and to evaluate  the risks and
   hazards associated with these  exposures. Chapter 5 pre-
   sents examples of reports generated by PAM and explains
   the meaning of the 'flags' assigned to hazardous substances,
   media, and facilities. Appendix A contains versions of the
   fate and transport equations used for radionuclides. Appen-
   dix B contains copies of PAM's reports.
   Specifications:  See also PB91-168450 and PB90-249715
   75p.
   Subject index keywords: Computerized simulation, Hazard-
   ous  materials, Superfund,  Environmental  surveys,  Waste
   management,  Documentation, Emergency Response Notifi-
   cation System, Priority Assessment Model.

 1144  Continuous Release-Emergency Response
   Notification System and Priority Assessment Model:
   User's Manual for EPA Regions
   Order Number PB91-168450CDH, price: PC A05/MF A01
   Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
   Emergency and Remedial Response; Oct 90
   The user's manual provides EPA Regional personnel with in-
   formation and detailed instructions on how to use the Contin-
   uous   Release-Emergency Response  Notification  System
   (CR-ERNS) and Priority Assessment  Model (PAM), an inte-
   grated database management system and screening-level
   risk assessment model.
   Specifications:  See also PB90-249715 and PB91-168468.
   88p.
   Subject  index keywords:   User  manuals(Computer pro-
   grams), Computerized simulation,  Hazardous materials, Su-
   perfund, Environmental surveys, Waste management, Emer-
   gency Response Notification System, Priority Assessment
   Model.

1145  Continuous Release - Emergency Response
   Notification System. User's Manual for Industry
   Order Number PB91-921287CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
   Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
   Emergency and Remedial Response; Mar 91
  The report announces the availability of the Agency's 'Con-
  tinuous Release-Emergency  Response Notification  System:
   User's manual  for Industry' and the accompanying  diskette.
  The diskette contains the Continuous Release-Emergency
  Response  Notification System (CR-ERNS). The  purpose of
  the  User's Manual is to assist industry in reporting  continu-
  ous releases of hazardous substances using CR-ERNS.
  Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
  posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S.,  Canada,
  and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
  paper  copy or microfiche. 36p.
  Subject index  keywords: Hazardous materials,  Waste dis-
  posal,  Superfund.

1146  Methodology for Evaluating Potential
  Carcinogenicity in Support of Reportable Quantity
  Adjustments Pursuant to CERCLA Section 102
  Order Number PB93-230027CDH, price: PC A04/MF  A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Health and Environmental  Assessment; Jun 88
  The Agency's Human Health Assessment Group (HHAG) has
  developed  a  methodology for ranking  CERCLA hazardous
  substances for the purpose of establishing reportable quanti-
  ties  (RQs) based on the primary criteria of potential carcino-
  genicity. The methodology combines the weight of evidence
                                                                                                           213

-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: RQ's & Continuous
Release
  and potency factor to determine a  hazard ranking of high,
  medium, or low which corresponds to an RQ of 1, 10, or 100
  pounds, respectively. An appendix is included which lists 194
  compounds that were evaluated for  potential carcinogenicity
  along with their respective weight-of-evidence categories, po-
  tency factors, and hazard rankings. Profiles for each of these
  194 chemicals are available as separate documents.
  Specifications:  See also PB89-181366. 59p.
  Subject index keywords: Superfund, Hazardous  materials,
  Health  hazards, Risk assessment.

1147   Notification of Hazardous Substance Sites (Section
  103(c))
  Order Number PB82-191990CDH, price: T02
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC; Jan 82
  The  Comprehensive  Environmental  Response,  Compensa-
  tion, and Liability Act (CERCLA) of  1980 PL 96-510 (com-
  monly  known as Superfund) mandates in Section 103(c) that
  certain  persons  notify the U.S.  Environmental Protection
  Agency (EPA) by June  9, 1981,  of the  existence of sites
  where  hazardous substances from  industries,  businesses,
  governments, hospitals, and other sources are stored, treat-
  ed, or  disposed of. This magnetic tape contains records of
  8664 notifications of hazardous substance sites that were re-
  ported  as of the  notification deadline date, (June 9, 1981).
  For  each  notification the  tape summarizes the  location,
  person required to notify, amount and type of any hazardous
  substance  to be  found, and  any  known or  suspected re-
  leases  of hazardous substances on the  site reported. The
  notifications were compiled to help EPA and State and local
  governments remedy problems created by uncontrolled haz-
  ardous substance disposal. The tape is sequenced alphabeti-
  cally by state and site name within  each  state,  respectively.
  Specifications: Source  tape is in  EBCDIC  character  set.
  Character set restricts preparation to 9 track, one-half inch
  tape only. Identify recording mode by specifying  density only.
  Call NTIS Computer Products if you have questions.
  Subject Index  keywords: Data file,  Hazardous  materials,
  Solid waste disposal.

 1148  Notification Requirements for Continuous Releases
  of Hazardous Substances
  Order  Number PB92-963422CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 92
  The fact sheet is designed to make facilities more familiar
  with the Continuous Releases Final Rule (55 FR 30166, July
  24,  1990), which permits reduced  reporting  of releases  of
  CERCLA hazardous substances when the releases are 'con-
  tinuous and stable in quantity and rate.' It also discusses the
  requirements of the continuous release reporting regulations
  and addresses  many key questions concerning their scope
  and applicability,  and answers questions about compliance
  with the reduced reporting  regime permitted for this type of
  release.
  Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
  posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
  and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
  paper  copy or microfiche. 9p.
  Subject index  keywords: Superfund, Hazardous materials,
  Waste management, Office of Solid Waste  and Emergency
  Response.
1149  Questions and Answers on Release Notification
  Requirements and Reportable Quantity Adjustments
  Order Number PB93-963411CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Oct 89
  The document answers  questions for the regulatory commu-
  nity concerning CERCLA and SARA Title III release notifica-
  tion requirements and reportable quantity adjustments.
  Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
  posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
  and Mexico;  all others $400). Single copies also available in
  paper copy or microfiche. 28p.
  Subject index  keywords:  Superfund,  Reporting  require-
  ments,  Pollutant releases.

1150   Reporting Requirements for Continuous  Releases of
  Hazardous Substances: A Guide for Facilities and
  Vessels on Compliance
  Order Number PB91-167593CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC.  Office of
  Emergency and Remedial Response; Oct 90
  The purpose of the Guide is to help you understand the defi-
  nitions  and requirements contained  in the U.S. Environmental
  Protection Agency's (EPA) regulation on reporting continuous
  releases of  hazardous substances (see  55 FR  30166; July
  24, 1990). The effective date of the regulation was Septem-
  ber 24, 1990. The continuous release reporting regulation
  allows  reduced reporting for facilities or vessels that release
  hazardous substances in a continuous and stable manner.
  The Guide has been  designed to provide information neces-
  sary to successfully comply with the regulation.  The Guide is
  divided into  two  parts. The first  part provides general infor-
  mation in a question and answer format regarding the contin-
  uous release reporting  regulation and your responsibility to
  report  releases of hazardous  substances. The  second  part
  contains detailed  instructions on how to prepare continuous
  release reports that include all  required information.
  Specifications: 43p.
  Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Superfund,
  Reporting requirements, Waste management,   Comprehen-
  sive Environmental  Response Compensation  and Liability
  Act.

 1151  Superfund Guide: Clean Air Act Hazardous Air
  Pollutants Added to the List  of CERCLA Hazardous
  Substances
  Order Number PB93-963425CDH, price: PC A01/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Sep 93
  The fact sheet identifies the 52 CAA hazardous air pollutants
  that have been added to the list of CERCLA hazardous sub-
  stances and that are now subject  to CERCLA  requirements;
  describes the reporting requirements and exemptions under
  CERCLA; and examines reporting  exemptions  in relation to
  releases of ethylene glycol.
  Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing  Order, de-
  posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
  and Mexico; all others  $400).  Single copies also available in
  paper  copy or microfiche. 5p.
  Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Air pollution,
   Identifying, Superfund.
 214

-------
                                                              PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Treatebility Sludies
 1152  Superfund Guide: Reportable Quantity Adjustment
   for Methyl Isocyanate (MIC)
   Order Number PB93-963424CDH, price: PC A0.1/MF A01
   Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
   Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Sep 93
   The fact sheet contains a discussion of the reportable quan-
   tity (RQ) adjustment and release reporting process, the basis
   for the current RQ adjustment to 10 pounds for methyl iso-
   cyanate (MIC),  and  information  about  the facilities  that
   handle MIC.
   Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
   posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S  Canada
   and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
   paper copy or microfiche. 4p.
   Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials,  Volatile  or-
   ganic compounds, Pollution control,  Superfund, Methyl  iso-
   cyanate.                                        *


 PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION:

 Treatability  Studies

 1153  Chemical Dehalogenation Treatability Studies under
   CERCLA: An Overview
   Order Number PB92-231299CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
   IT Corp., Sharonville, OH.; Environmental Protection Agency,
   Cincinnati, OH. Risk Reduction Engineering Lab; May 92
   The fact sheet provides a summary of information to facili-
   tate the planning and execution of chemical dehalogenation
   treatabihty studies in support of the RI/FS process. Detailed
   information on these pre-ROD treatability studies is provided
   m the  Guide  for Conducting Treatability  Studies  Under
   CERCLA: Chemical  Dehalogenation,  EPA/540/R-92/013a,
   May 1992. The technology-specific guide was designed to be
   used in conjunction with the final generic Guide for Conduct-
  ing Treatability Studies Under CERCLA, which provides gen-
  eral information on the planning and execution of pre- and
  post-ROD treatability studies.  Although some information on
  post-ROD chemical dehalogenation testing is provided here
  the focus of the fact sheet and the chemical dehalogenation
  guide is on pre-ROD treatability studies.
  Specifications:  See also PB92-169275. Sponsored by Envi-
  ronmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk Reduction
  Engineering Lab. 10p.
  Subject index keywords:  Hazardous materials, Chemical
  analysis, Waste treatment, Superfund, Dehalogenation.

1154  Guide for Conducting Treatability Studies under
  CERCLA
  Order Number PB90-249772CDH, price: PC A07/MF A01
  PEI Associates, Inc., Cincinnati, OH.; Environmental
  Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of Emergency
  and Remedial Response; Dec 89
  The guide describes an approach for conducting treatability
  studies  that consists  of laboratory screening, bench-scale
 testing,  and pilot-scale testing. The  guide also presents  a
 stepwise approach or protocol for conducting  treatability
 studies for determination of the effectiveness of a technology
 (or combination of technologies) in remediating a CERCLA
 site.
 Specifications:   Sponsored  by Environmental  Protection
 Agency, Washington, DC. Office of Emergency and Remedial
 Response. 134p.
   Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Superfund,
   Remedial  action, Comprehensive Environmental  Response
   Compensation and Liability Act.

 1155  Guide for Conducting Treatability Studies under
   CERCLA
   Order Number PB93-126787CDH, price: PC A05/MF A01
   Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
   Emergency and Remedial Response; Nov 92
   Systemically conducted, well-documented treatability studies
   are an important component of the removal process, remedi-
   al investigation/feasibility study (RI/FS) process and the re-
   medial design/remedial action (RD/RA) process under the
   Comprehensive  Environmental  Response,  Compensation,
   and Liability Act  (CERCLA). The guide describes  a three-
   tiered  approach for conducting treatability studies that con-
   sists of (1) remedy screening, (2) remedy-selection testing,
   and (3) RD/RA testing.
   Specifications: See also PB91-249772. 83p.
   Subject index keywords:  Hazardous materials, Waste treat-
   ment, Superfund, Remedial action.

 1156  Guide for Conducting Treatability Studies under
   CERCLA: Aerobic Biodegradation Remedy Screening
   Order Number PB92-109073CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
   Science Applications International Corp., Cincinnati, OH.;
   Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk
   Reduction Engineering Lab; Jul 91
   The fact sheet provides a summary of information  to facili-
   tate the  planning  and execution of aerobic biodegradation
   remedy screening  treatability studies in support of the RI/FS
   and the remedial  design/remedial action (RD/RA) process-
   es. The fact sheet follows the organization of the 'Guide for
   Conducting Treatability Studies Under CERCLA: Aerobic Bio-
   degradation Remedy Screening,  Interim  Guidance  (PB92-
   109065),  July 1991. Detailed information  on designing and
   implementing remedy screening and remedy selection treat-
   ability studies for  aerobic biodegradation is provided in the
   guidance document. The guidance discusses only screening
  of biological treatment. Remedy selection guidance for aero-
  bic biodegradation  is currently in the planning stages.
  Specifications:  See  also  PB92-109065 and PB90-249772.
  Sponsored  by Environmental  Protection Agency, Cincinnati,
  OH. Risk Reduction Engineering Lab. 9p.
  Subject index keywords:  Superfund, Waste management,
  Hazardous  materials,  Biodeterioration,  Aerobic  processes,
  Office of  Solid Waste and  Emergency Response, Prereme-
  dial actions.

1157  Guide for Conducting Treatability Studies under
  CERCLA: Aerobic Biodegradation Remedy Screening.
  Interim Guidance
  Order Number PB92-109065CDH,  price: PC A03/MF A01
  Science Applications International  Corp., Cincinnati, OH.;
  Environmental Protection Agency,  Washington, DC. Office of
  Emergency and Remedial Response; Jul 91
  Systematically conducted, well-documented treatability stud-
  ies are  an important component  of remedy evaluation and
 selection under the Superfund program. The manual focuses
 on aerobic biodegradation remedy screening treatability stud-
 ies conducted in support  of remedy selection that is conduct-
 ed prior to the Record of Decision (ROD). The manual pre-
 sents a standard guide for designing and implementing an
                                                                                                            215

-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Treatability Studies
  aerobic  biodegradation remedy screening treatability study.
  The manual presents a description of and discusses the ap-
  plicability and limitations of aerobic biodegradation technol-
  ogies and defines the prescreening and field measurement
  data needed to determine if treatability testing is required. It
  also  presents an overview of the  process of conducting
  treatabiiity tests and the applicability of tiered treatability test-
  ing for evaluation aerobic biodegradation technologies. The
  specific  goals of each tier of testing are defined and perform-
  ance levels are presented that should be met at the remedy
  screening level before additional tests are conducted at the
  next tier. The elements of a treatability  study work plan are
  also  defined  with detailed  discussions  on  the  design  and
  execution of the remedy screening treatability study.
  Specifications:  See also PB90-249772 and PB92-109073.
  Sponsored by Environmental Protection Agency, Washington,
  DC. Office of Emergency and Remedial Response. 43p.
  Subject Index keywords:  Superfund, Waste management,
  Hazardous materials, Biodeterioration,  Aerobic processes,
  Preremedial actions.
 1158  Guide for Conducting Treatability Studies under
  CERCLA: Aerobic Biodegradation Remedy Screening.
  Quick Reference Fact Sheet
  Order Number PB92-224377CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Solid Waste and Emergency Response;  Jul 91
  The fact sheet provides a  summary  of information  to  facili-
  tate the planning and execution  of  aerobic biodegradation
  remedy screening treatability studies in  support of the reme-
  dial  investigation/feasibility study  (RI/FS) and  the  remedial
  design/remedial action (RD/RA) processes. This fact  sheet
  follows  the organization of the 'Guide for Conducting Treat-
  ability  Studies  Under  CERCLA: Aerobic  Biodegradation
  Remedy Screening, Interim Guidance,' EPA/540/2-91/013A,
  July 1991. Detailed information on designing and implement-
  ing remedy screening and remedy selection treatability stud-
  ies for  aerobic biodegradation  is provided in  the guidance
  document. This guidance discusses only screening of biologi-
  cal treatment. Remedy selection guidance for aerobic biode-
  gradation is currently in the planning stages.
   Specifications: See also PB92-109065. 9p.
   Subject index keywords: Superfund,  Waste  management,
   Hazardous materials,  Aerobic  processes, Biodeterioration,
   Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response.
 1159   Guide for Conducting Treatability Studies under
   CERCLA: Biodegradation Remedy Selection. Interim
   Guidance
   Order Number PB94-117470CDH, price: PC A05/MF A01
   Science Applications International Corp., Cincinnati, OH.;
   Environmental Protection Agency, Washington,  DC. Office of
   Emergency and Remedial Response; 1993
   The primary purpose of the guide is to provide standard guid-
   ance for designing and implementing a biodegradation treat-
   ability study  In support of remedy selection testing. Addition-
   ally, it  describes a three-tiered  approach that consists of (1)
   rerrtedy screening  testing,  (2) remedy  selection testing, and
   (3) remedial design/remedial action  testing. It  also presents
   a guide for conducting treatability studies in a systematic and
   stepwise  fashion  for determination  of the effectiveness of
   biodegradation in remediating a site. The intended audience
   for the guide includes Remedial Project Managers, On-Scene
  Coordinators,  Potentially Responsible Parties, consultants,
  contractors, and technology vendors.
  Specifications:  See also PB93-126787.  Sponsored by Envi-
  ronmental  Protection Agency,  Washington,  DC.  Office of
  Emergency and Remedial Response. 85p.
  Subject index keywords:  Superfund, Hazardous  materials,
  Bioremediation.
1160  Guide for Conducting Treatability  Studies under
  CERCLA: Biodegradation Remedy Selection. Quick
  Reference Fact Sheet
  Order Number PB94-144136CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Aug 93
  This fact sheet provides a summary  of  information to facili-
  tate the planning and execution  of  biodegradation  remedy
  selection treatability studies in support of the remedial inves-
  tigation/feasibility study (RI/FS) and the  remedial design/re-
  medial action (RD/RA) processes. It is  intended to provide
  Remedial Project Managers (RPMs), On  Scene Coordinators
  (OSCs), Potentially Responsible Parties (PRPs), and other in-
  terested  persons  with  enough  information to  determine
  whether biodegradation  treatability studies may  be consid-
  ered  in the remedy selection  phase of the RI/FS for the
  Comprehensive Environmental Response Compensation and
  Liability Act (CERCLA) site  of interest. This fact sheet follows
  the organization of the 'Guide for  Conducting  Treatability
  Studies Under CERCLA: Biodegradation Remedy Selection,
  'EPA/540/R-93/514A', 1993. Detailed information on design-
  ing and implementing remedy selection treatability studies for
  biodegradation is provided in the guidance document.
  Specifications:  See also PB94-117470. 11 p.
  Subject index keywords:  Superfund, Waste management,
  Hazardous materials, Biodeterioration, Office of Solid Waste
  and Emergency Response.
 1161  Guide for Conducting Treatability Studies under
  CERCLA: Chemical Dehalogenation
  Order Number PB92-169044CDH, price:  PC A05/MF A01
  IT Corp., Sharonville, OH.; Environmental Protection Agency,
  Cincinnati, OH. Risk Reduction  Engineering Lab; May 92
  Systematically conducted,  well-documented  treatability stud-
  ies are an important  component of the remedial  investiga-
  tion/feasibility  study  (RI/FS)  process and  the  remedial
  design/remedial action (RD/RA) process under the  Compre-
  hensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liabil-
  ity Act (CERCLA). The guide, which presents information on
  treatability studies involving chemical dehalogenation of soils
  and sludges, is intended to supplement  the information in the
  final  generic guide. The guide describes a three-tiered ap-
  proach for conducting treatability studies, which consists  of
   (1) remedy screening, (2) remedy selection, and (3) remedial
   design/remedial action. The purpose  of remedy-screening
   studies for chemical dehalogenation technologies is to deter-
   mine if the technology is chemically feasible for the contami-
   nants/matrix of concern.  The  guide also presents detailed,
   technology-specific information on the preparation of a Work
   Plan and a Sampling  and  Analysis Plan for  chemical dehalo-
   genation  treatability studies. Elements discussed include test
   objectives, experimental design and procedures, equipment
   and  materials, sampling and analysis procedures, quality as-
   surance/quality control procedures, and data analysis and in-
   terpretation.
  216

-------
                                                               PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Treatability Studies
   Specifications:  See also  PB92-169275 and  PB91-228031.
   Sponsored by  Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati,
   OH. Risk Reduction Engineering Lab. 80p.
   Subject index keywords:  Waste management, Superfund,
   Environmental surveys, Hazardous materials, Chemical treat-
   ment, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response.

 1162  Guide for Conducting Treatability Studies under
   CERCLA: Chemical Dehalogenation. Final Report
   Order Number PB92-231307CDH, price: PC A05/MF A01
   IT Corp., Sharonville, OH.; Environmental Protection Agency,
   Cincinnati, OH.  Risk Reduction Engineering Lab; May 92
   Systematically conducted, well-documented treatability stud-
   ies are an important component of the remedial investiga-
   tion/feasibility  study  (RI/FS)  process  and  the  remedial
   design/remedial action (RD/RA) process under the Compre-
   hensive Environmental Response,  Compensation, and Liabil-
   ity  Act  (CERCLA).  The guide describes a three-tiered  ap-
   proach for conducting treatability studies, which consists of
   (1)  remedy screening, (2) remedy selection, and (3) remedial
   design/remedial action. The  purpose  of  remedy-screening
   studies for chemical dehalogenation technologies is to deter-
   mine if the technology is chemically feasible for the contami-
   nants/matrix  of concern. Remedial  design/remedial  action
   studies, which  are  performed post-ROD, provide detailed
   design and operating data necessary to scale up and imple-
   ment the technology.
   Specifications:  See also PB92-169044. Sponsored by Envi-
   ronmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk Reduction
   Engineering Lab. 81 p.
   Subject index  keywords:  Waste  management, Hazardous
   materials, Superfund.

 1163  Guide for Conducting  Treatability Studies under
   CERCLA: Soil Vapor Extraction. Interim Guidance
   Order Number PB92-227271CDH, price: PC A05/MF A01
   Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
   Emergency and  Remedial Response; Sep 91
   Section  121(b)  of the Comprehensive Environmental  Re-
   sponse,  Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980 (CERCLA)
   mandates the U.S. Environmental  Protection Agency  (EPA)
  to select remedies that 'utilize permanent solutions and alter-
  native treatment technologies or resource recovery technol-
  ogies to the maximum extent practicable'. Treatability studies
  conducted during the RI/FS phase indicate whether a given
  technology can meet the expected cleanup goals for the site.
  The document refers  to three levels or tiers of treatability
  studies:  remedy  screening,  remedy selection,  and remedy
  design.
  Specifications:  See also PB92-224401. 83p.
  Subject  index keywords:  Hazardous  materials, Recovery
  Waste treatment, Soils.

1164  Guide for Conducting Treatability Studies under
  CERCLA: Soil Vapor Extraction. Quick Reference Fact
  Sheet
  Order Number PB92-224401CDH, price:  PC A02/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Solid Waste and Emergency  Response; Sep 91
  The fact sheet provides a summary of  information to  facili-
  tate the planning and execution of soil vapor extraction
  (SVE)  remedy screening and  remedy  selection treatability
  studies in  support  or'the  remedial  investigation/feasibility
  study (RI/FS) and the remedial design/remedial action (RD/
   RA) processes. Detailed information on designing and imple-
   menting remedy screening and remedy selection treatability
   studies for SVE  is provided in  the  'Guide for Conducting
   Treatability Studies Under CERCLA:  Soil Vapor Extraction,'
   Interim Guidance, EPA/540/2-91/019A, September 1991.
   Specifications:  10p.
   Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste  management,
   Hazardous materials, Office  of Solid Waste and Emergency
   Response, Soil vapor extraction.

 1165  Guide for Conducting Treatability Studies under
   CERCLA: Soil Washing. Interim Guidance
   Order Number PB92-170570CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
   Science Applications International Corp., Cincinnati,  OH.;
   Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk
   Reduction Engineering Lab; Sep 91
   Systematically conducted,  well-documented treatability stud-
   ies are an important component of the  remedial investiga-
   tion/feasibility study  (RI/FS)  process  and the  remedial
   design/remedial action (RD/RA) process  under the Compre-
   hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
   ity Act (CERCLA). The studies provide valuable site-specific
   data necessary to aid in the selection and implementation of
   the remedy. The manual focuses on soil  washing treatability
   studies conducted in support of remedy selection prior to de-
   veloping the Record of Decision.  The manual presents guid-
   ance for designing and implementing a soil washing treatabil-
   ity study. The manual gives an overview of general informa-
   tion for determining whether soil washing  technology may be
   effective guidance in designing and conducting soil washing
   treatability studies for remedy selection, assistance in inter-
   preting data obtained from  remedy selection treatability stud-
   ies, and guidance to estimate costs associated with remedy
   design and full-scale  soil  washing  remedial  action.  The
   manual is not intended to serve as a substitute for communi-
   cation with  reports or regulators nor  as the sole basis for the
  selection of soil washing as a particular remediation technol-
  ogy.  Soil washing must be used in conjunction with other
  treatment  technologies since it  generates  residuals.  The
  manual is designed to be used in  conjunction with the Guide
  for Conducting Treatability  Studies  Under CERCLA; Interim
  Final.
  Specifications: See also  PB89-132674,  PB89-212757 and
  PB90-249772.  Sponsored   by   Environmental   Protection
  Agency, Cincinnati,  OH.  Risk Reduction  Engineering Lab.
  47p.
  Subject index keywords: Superfund, Remedial action, Land
  pollution control, Soil treatment, Comprehensive Environmen-
  tal Response Compensation and  Liability  Act, Soil washing.

1166  Guide  for Conducting Treatability Studies under
  CERCLA: Soil Washing: Quick Reference Fact Sheet
  Order Number PB92-170588CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
  Science Applications International Corp., Cincinnati, OH.;
  Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk
  Reduction Engineering Lab;  Sep 91
  The fact sheet provides a summary of information to facili-
  tate the planning and execution of soil washing remedy se-
  lection treatability studies in  support of the RI/FS and the re-
  medial design/remedial action (RD/RA) processes. The fact
  sheet follows the organization of the  'Guide for the 'Conduct-
  ing Treatability Studies Under CERCLA: Soil Washing,' Inter-
  im Guidance, (PB92-170570) September 1991. Detailed infor-
                                                                                                              217

-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Treatability Studies
  matron on  designing  and implementing  remedy  selection
  treatability studies for  soil  washing is provided in  the guid-
  ance cJocument.
  Specifications: See also PB92-170570. Sponsored by Envi-
  ronmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk Reduction
  Engineering Lab. 9p.
  Subject index keywords: Superfund, Remedial action, Land
  pollution control, Soil treatment, Comprehensive Environmen-
  tal Response Compensation  and Liability Act, Soil  washing,
  Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response.

1167  Guide for Conducting Treatability Studies under
  CERCLA Solvent Extraction. Interim Guidance
  Order Number PB92-239581CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
  Science Applications International Corp., Cincinnati,  OH.;
  Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk
  Reduction Engineering Lab; Aug 92
  Systematically conducted, well-documented treatability stud-
  ies  are  an  important component of remedy  evaluation and
  selection under the Superfund program. This manual focuses
  on  solvent extraction  treatability studies.  This manual pre-
  sents a standard  guide for designing and implementing sol-
  vent extraction treatability studies. The manual presents  a
  description  of and discusses the applicability  and limitations
  of solvent extraction technologies and defines the prescreen-
  ing  and field measurement data needed to determine if treat-
  ability testing is required. It also  presents an overview of the
  process of conducting treatability  tests and the applicability
  of tiered treatability testing for evaluation solvent extraction
  technologies. The specific goals of each  tier of testing are
  defined and performance levels are presented that should be
  met at the remedy screening level before additional tests are
  conducted at the next tier.
  Specifications:   Sponsored by  Environmental  Protection
  Agency,  Cincinnati, OH.  Risk Reduction Engineering  Lab.
  47p.
  Subject index keywords: Waste  management, Hazardous
  materials, Superfund, Office  of Solid Waste and Emergency
  Response.
1168   Guide for Conducting Treatability Studies under
  CERCLA: Solvent Extraction Quick Reference Fact Sheet
  Order Number PB92-239599CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
  Science Applications International Corp., Cincinnati, OH.;
  Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk
  Reduction Engineering Lab; Aug 92
  Systematically conducted,  well-documented treatability  stud-
  ies are an important component  of remedy  evaluation and
  selection under the Superfund Program. This fact sheet fo-
  cuses  on solvent extraction treatability  studies,  and  is  a
  highly abridged version of the guide which bears  the same
  title. This fact sheet presents an abbreviated guide for de-
  signing  and implementing solvent extraction treatability  stud-
  ies. The fact sheet presents a description of and  discusses
  the applicability and limitations of solvent extraction technol-
  ogies and defines the prescreening and field measurement
  data needed  to determine if treatability testing is required.
  Specifications: See also  PB92-239581. Sponsored by Envi-
  ronmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH.  Risk  Reduction
  Engineering Lab. 9p.
  Subject index keywords: Waste management, Hazardous
  materials, Superfund, Office  of Solid Waste and Emergency
  Response.
1169  Guide for Conducting Treatability Studies under
  CERCLA: Thermal Desorption Quick Reference Fact
  Sheet
  Order Number PB93-12132^CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
  Science Applications International Corp., Cincinnati, OH.;
  Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk
  Reduction Engineering Lab; Sep 92
  Systematically conducted, well  documented treatability stud-
  ies are  an important component of  remedy evaluation and
  selection under the  Superfund  program. This fact sheet fo-
  cuses on  thermal desorptibn  remedy selection treatability
  studies conducted in support of remedy selection that is con-
  ducted  prior to the  Record  of Decision  (ROD).  This fact
  sheet presents a brief overview of how to design and imple-
  ment  a thermal  desorption  remedy  screening treatability
  study. It also discusses the applicability of tiered treatability
  testing for evaluation of thermal desorption technologies.
  Specifications:   Sponsored  by Environmental Protection
  Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk Reduction Engineering Lab. 9p.
  Subject index  keywords: Waste  management, Superfund,
  Hazardous materials, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
  Response.

1170  Guide for Conducting Treatability Studies under
  CERCLA: Thermal Desorption Remedy Selection. Interim
  Guidance
  Order Number PB93-126597CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
  Science Applications International Corp., Cincinnati, OH.;
  Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk
  Reduction Engineering Lab; Sep 92
  Systematically  conducted, well-documented treatability stud-
  ies  are  an important component of remedy evaluation and
  selection under the Superfund program. The manual  focuses
  on thermal desorption remedy selection treatability studies
  conducted in support of remedy selection that is conducted
  prior to  the Record of Decision (ROD). The manual presents
  a standard guide  for designing and  implementing a thermal
  desorption remedy  selection treatability study.  The manual
  presents a description of arid discusses and defines  the pre-
  screening and  field  measurement data needed  to determine
  if treatability testing is required. It also presents an overview
  of the process  of conducting treatability tests and the appli-
  cability  of tiered treatability testing for evaluation of thermal
  desorption technologies. The  specific goals of each tier of
  testing  are defined and performance levels  are  presented
  that should be met at the remedy screening level before ad-
  ditional  tests are conducted at  the next tier. The elements of
  a treatability study work plan  are also defined  with  detailed
  discussions  on the  design and execution  of the  remedy
  screening treatability study.
  Specifications: See also PB93-121325. Sponsored  by Envi-
  ronmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk Reduction
  Engineering  Lab. 47p.
  Subject index keywords: Heat treatment,  Superfund,  Re-
  medial  action,  Waste management,  Organic  compounds,
  Thermal desorption.
 218

-------
                                                                           PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: 103(C)
 1171  Inventory of Treatability Study Vendors. Volume 1
   Order Number PB91-228395CDH, price: PC A14/MF A03
   PEI Associates, Inc., Arlington, VA.; Environmental Protection
   Agency, Washington, DC. Office of Emergency and Remedial
   Response; Mar 90
   The document was developed to facilitate the  performance
   of treatability studies by ensuring that requests for proposals
   (RFPs)  for  treatability studies  are  made available to the
   broadest subset  of contractors who can perform  such stud-
   ies. The listing is not a pre-qualification of contractors and all
   RFPs must be done in accordance with the Federal Acquisi-
   tions  Regulations. The information contained in the inventory
   has been organized into two volumes. Volume I  provides list-
   ings of treatability  study vendors organized  by technology
   and contaminant groups. The intended  users of the docu-
   ment  are Superfund remedial project managers  and  contrac-
   tors who are involved in a  procurement process to obtain a
   treatability study. Volume II  provides vendor specific  informa-
   tion, i.e., permit status and scale of studies conducted. The
   information can be obtained by contacting the  vendors identi-
   fied in Volume I. Volume II is not available.  Both Volume  I
   and II are being updated.
   Specifications:  Sponsored by  Environmental  Protection
   Agency, Washington, DC. Office of Emergency and Remedial
   Response. 302p.
   Subject index keywords: Hazardous  materials, Remedial
   action, Waste treatment, Superfund, Vendors.
 1172  Treatability  Studies Under CERCLA: An Overview
   Order Number PB90-273970CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
   Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
   Emergency and Remedial Response; Dec 89
   The fact sheet provides a synopsis of information to facilitate
   the  planning and execution of treatability studies  in  support
   of the RI/FS and  the RD/RA processes.
   Specifications:  8p.
   Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste treat-
   ment,  Superfund,  Waste management, Office of  Solid Waste
  and Emergency  Response, Comprehensive  Environmental
   Response Compensation and Liability Act.


PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION:  103(c)

1173  Notification  of Hazardous Waste Sites Required
  Under Section 103(c) of the Comprehensive
  Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability
  Act (CERCLA) of 1980
  Order  Number PB82-213984CDH,  price: PC$351.00
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington,  DC; Mar 82
  Specifications:  Set includes PB82-213992 through  PB82-
  214081.3180p-in  10v.

1174  Notification of Hazardous Waste Sites Required
  Under Section 103(c) of the Comprehensive
  Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability
  Act  (CERCLA) of 1980: EPA Region 1
  Order Number PB82-213992CDH, price: PC A08/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington,  DC;  Mar 82
  The  Comprehensive  Environmental Response,  Compensa-
  tion, and Liability  Act (CERCLA) of 1980  PL  96-510 (com-
  monly  known as Superfund)  mandates in Section 103(c) that
  certain  persons  notify  the  U.S.  Environmental  Protection
  Agency (EPA) by June 9,  1981  of the existence of sites
   where hazardous wastes from industries,  businesses, gov-
   ernment, hospitals, and other sources are stored, treated or
   disposed of. This document comprises a listing of 8,755 noti-
   fications of hazardous waste sites. For each notification, the
   listing summarizes the  location, the persons  required  to
   notify, the amount and type of any hazardous waste to be
   found on the site  reported, and any known or suspected re-
   leases of hazardous wastes. The CERCLA 103(c) notification
   was mandated to help EPA and State and local governments
   remedy problems  created by uncontrolled  hazardous  waste
   disposal. This document contains ten volumes, one for each
   EPA  region. Within each volume, the notifications are pre-
   sented  alphabetically  by  state  and site name within each
   state, respectively.
   Specifications: Also  available in set of 10 reports PC E99,
   PB82-213984. See also PB82-214008. 170p.
   Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste dis-
   posal, Comprehensive environmental response, Toxic sub-
   stances, EPA region 1.

 1175  Notification of Hazardous Waste Sites Required
   Under Section 103(c) of the Comprehensive
   Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability
   Act (CERCLA) of  1980: EPA Region 2
   Order Number PB82-214008CDH, price: PC A14/MF A01
   Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC; Mar 82
   The  Comprehensive  Environmental  Response,  Compensa-
   tion,  and Liability Act  (CERCLA) of 1980 PL 96-510 (com-
   monly known  as Superfund) mandates in Section 103(c) that
   certain persons notify the U.S.  Environmental Protection
   Agency (EPA) by  June 9, 1981 of the existence of sites
   where hazardous wastes  from  industries, businesses, gov-
   ernment, hospitals, and other sources are stored, treated or
   disposed of. This document comprises a listing of 8,755 noti-
   fications of hazardous waste sites. For each notification, the
   listing summarizes  the location, the  persons required  to
   notify, the amount and type of  any  hazardous waste to  be
  found on the site reported, and  any known or suspected  re-
   leases of hazardous wastes. The CERCLA 103(c) notification
  was mandated to help EPA and State and local governments
  remedy problems created by uncontrolled hazardous waste
  disposal. This document contains ten volumes, one for each
  EPA  region. Within each volume, the  notifications are pre-
  sented alphabetically  by state and  site  name  within  each
  state, respectively.
  Specifications: Also available in set of 10  reports PC E99,
  PB82-213984. See also  PB82-213992, and  PB82-214016.
  311 p.
  Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste dis-
  posal, Comprehensive  environmental response, Toxic sub-
  stances, EPA region 2.

1176  Notification of Hazardous  Waste Sites Required
  Under Section 103(c)  of the Comprehensive
  Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability
  Act (CERCLA) of 1980: EPA Region 3
  Order Number PB82-214016CDH, price: PC A16/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington,  DC; Mar 82
  The Comprehensive Environmental  Response,  Compensa-
  tion, and Liability Act  (CERCLA)  of 1980 PL  96-510  (com-
  monly  known as Superfund) mandates in Section 103(c) that
  certain  persons  notify the U.S. Environmental  Protection
  Agency (EPA) by June 9, 1981  of  the existence of  sites
                                                                                                            219

-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: 103(c)
  where hazardous wastes from industries, businesses, gov-
  ernment, hospitals, and other sources are stored, treated or
  disposed of. This document comprises a listing of 8,755 noti-
  fications of hazardous waste sites. For each notification, the
  listing summarizes  the  location,  the  persons required to
  notify, the amount and type of any  hazardous waste to be
  found on the site reported,  and any  known or suspected re-
  leases of hazardous wastes. The CERGLA 103(c) notification
  was mandated to help EPA  and State and local governments
  remedy problems created by uncontrolled hazardous waste
  disposal. This document contains ten volumes, one for each
  EPA region.  Within each volume, the  notifications are pre-
  sented alphabetically by state and  site name within each
  state, respectively.
  Specifications:  Also available in set of 10 reports PC E99,
  PB82-213984. See also PB82-214008,  and PB82-214024.
  367p.
  Subject index keywords:  Hazardous  materials, Waste dis-
  posal. Comprehensive environmental response,  Toxic sub-
  stances, EPA region 3.
       lid , • I •        ' I    , I!'  '       •  •        •     •
1177   Notification of Hazardous Waste Sites Required
  Under Section 103(c) of the Comprehensive
  Environmental Response,  Compensation and Liability
  Act (CERCLA) of 1980: EPA Region 4
  Order Number PB82-214024CDH, price: PC A20/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC; Mar 82
  The  Comprehensive Environmental  Response,  Compensa-
  tion, and Liability Act (CERCLA) of 1980 PL 96-510 (com-
  monly known as Superfund) mandates in Section 103(c) that
  certain persons notify  the U.S.  Environmental  Protection
  Agency (EPA)  by June 9,  1981  of the existence of sites
  where hazardous wastes from industries, businesses, gov-
  ernment,  hospitals, and  other sources are stored, treated or
  disposed of.  This document comprises a listing of 8,755 noti-
  fications of hazardous waste sites. For each notification,  the
  listing summarizes  the  location,  the  persons  required to
  notify, the amount and type of any hazardous waste to be
  found on the site reported,  and any known or suspected re-
  leases of hazardous wastes. The CERCLA 103(c) notification
  was mandated to help EPA and State and local governments
  remedy problems created by uncontrolled  hazardous waste
  disposal. This document contains ten volumes, one for each
  EPA region.  Within each volume, the notifications are pre-
  sented alphabetically by state and site name within each
  state, respectively.
  Specifications:  Also available in set of 10 reports PC E99,
  PB82-213984. See also PB82-214016,  and  PB82-214032.
  474p.
  Subject index keywords:  Hazardous materials, Waste dis-
  posal, Comprehensive environmental response, Toxic sub-
  stances, EPA region 4.
1178   Notification of Hazardous Waste Sites Required
  Under Section  103(c) of the Comprehensive
  Environmental  Response, Compensation and Liability
  Act (CERCLA) of 1980: EPA Region 5
  Order Number PB82-214032CDH, price: PC$84.00
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC; Mar 82
  The Comprehensive  Environmental Response,  Compensa-
  tion, and Liability Act (CERCLA)  of 1980 PL 96-510 (com-
  monly known as Superfund) mandates in Section 103(c) that
  certain persons notify  the U.S. Environmental Protection
  Agency (EPA)  by June  9, 1981  of the existence of sites
  where hazardous wastes from industries, businesses, gov-
  ernment, hospitals, and other sources are stored, treated or
  disposed of. This document comprises a listing of 8,755 noti-
  fications of hazardous waste sites. For each notification, the
  listing summarizes  the  location, the persons  required to
  notify, the amount and type of any hazardous waste to be
  found on the site reported, and any known or suspected re-
  leases of  hazardous wastes. The CERCLA 103 (c) notifica-
  tion was mandated to help EPA and State and  local govern-
  ments remedy problems created by uncontrolled hazardous
  waste disposal. This document contains  ten volumes, onefor
  each  EPA region. Within each volume, the notifications are
  presented alphabetically by state and  site name within each
  state, respectively.
  Specifications: Also available in set of  10 reports PC E99,
  PB82-213984. See  also  PB82-214024,  and PB82-214040.
  Portions of this document are not fully  legible. 719p.
  Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste dis-
  posal, Comprehensive environmental  response, Toxic sub-
  stances, EPA region 5.

1179  Notification of Hazardous Waste Sites Required
  Under Section 103(c) of the Comprehensive
  Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability
  Act (CERCLA) of 1980: EPA Region 6
  Order Number PB82-214040CDH, price: PC A17/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC; Mar 82
  The  Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensa-
  tion,  and  Liability Act (CERCLA) of 1980 PL 96-510 (com-
  monly known as Superfund) mandates in Section 103(c) that
  certain  persons  notify the U.S.  Environmental Protection
  Agency (EPA)  by June 9,  1981 of the existence of sites
  where hazardous wastes from industries, businesses, gov-
  ernment, hospitals,  and other  sources are stored, treated or
  disposed of. This document comprises a listing  of 8,755 noti-
  fications of hazardous waste sites. For each notification,  the
  listing summarizes  the location,  the  persons required to
  notify, the amount and type  of any hazardous waste to be
  found on the site reported, and any known or suspected re-
  leases of hazardous wastes. The CERCLA 103(c) notification
  was mandated to help EPA and State  and local governments
  remedy problems created  by  uncontrolled hazardous waste
  disposal. This document contains ten  volumes, one for each
  EPA  region.  Within each volume,  the notifications are pre-
  sented alphabetically by state and site name within each
  state, respectively.
  Specifications: Also available in set  of 10 reports PC E99,
  PB82-213984. See also PB82-214032,  and  PB82-214057.
  Portions of this document are not fully legible. 379p.
  Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste dis-
  posal, Comprehensive environmental response,  Toxic  sub-
  stances, EPA region 6.

1180   Notification of Hazardous Waste Sites Required
  Under Section 103(c) of the Comprehensive
  Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability
  Act (CERCLA) of 1980: EPA Region  7
  Order Number PB82-214057CDH, price:  PC A10/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC; Mar 82
  The  Comprehensive  Environmental  Response, Compensa-
  tion,  and  Liability Act (CERCLA) of 1980 PL 96-510  (com-
  monly known as Superfund) mandates in Section 103(c) that
  certain persons  notify  the  U.S.  Environmental  Protection
220

-------
                                                                            PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: 103(C)
   Agency  (EPA)  by June 9, 1981 of the existence of sites
   where hazardous wastes  from  industries, businesses, gov-
   ernment, hospitals, and other sources are stored, treated or
   disposed of. This document comprises a listing of 8,755 noti-
   fications of hazardous waste sites. For each notification,  the
   listing summarizes  the location, the  persons required  to
   notify, the  amount and type of  any hazardous waste to be
   found on the site reported, and  any known or  suspected re-
   leases of hazardous wastes. The CERCLA 103(c) notification
   was mandated to help EPA and State and local governments
   remedy problems created  by  uncontrolled hazardous waste
   disposal. This document contains ten volumes, one for each
   EPA  region. Within  each volume, the notifications are pre-
   sented  alphabetically  by  state and site  name within  each
   state, respectively.
   Specifications: Also available in set of 10 reports PC E99
   PB82-213984. See  also  PB82-214040, and  PB82-214065'
   211p.
   Subject  index  keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste dis-
   posal, Comprehensive  environmental  response, Toxic sub-
   stances,  EPA region 7.

 1181   Notification of Hazardous Waste Sites Required
   Under Section  103(c) of the Comprehensive
   Environmental  Response, Compensation and Liability
   Act (CERCLA) of 1980: EPA Region 8
   Order Number PB82-214065CDH, price: PC A06/MF A01
   Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC; Mar 82
   The Comprehensive  Environmental Response, Compensa-
   tion, and Liability  Act  (CERCLA) of 1980  PL 96-510  (com-
   monly known  as Superfund) mandates  in Section 103(c) that
   certain persons notify the U.S. Environmental  Protection
   Agency (EPA) by June 9, 1981  of the existence of sites
   where hazardous  wastes  from industries,  businesses,  gov-
   ernment, hospitals, and other sources are stored, treated or
   disposed of. This document comprises a listing of 8,755 noti-
   fications of  hazardous waste sites. For each notification, the
   listing summarizes the location, the  persons required  to
   notify, the amount and type of any  hazardous waste to  be
  found on the site reported, and any known or suspected re-
   leases of hazardous wastes. The CERCLA 103(c) notification
  was mandated to help EPA and State and local governments
  remedy problems created by uncontrolled  hazardous waste
  disposal.  This document contains ten volumes, one for each
  EPA region. Within each volume, the  notifications are pre-
  sented alphabetically by state and  site name within  each
  state,  respectively.
  Specifications:  Also available  in set of 10 reports PC E99
  PB82-213984. See also PB82-214057, and  PB82-214073'
  123p.
  Subject index keywords:  Hazardous materials, Waste dis-
  posal, Comprehensive  environmental response, Toxic sub-
  stances, EPA region 8.

1182  Notification of Hazardous Waste Sites Required
  Under Section 103(c) of the Comprehensive
  Environmental Response, Compensation and  Liability
  Act (CERCLA) of 1980: EPA Region 9
  Order  Number PB82-214073CDH, price: PC A13/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC; Mar 82
  The Comprehensive  Environmental Response, Compensa-
  tion, and  Liability Act (CERCLA)  of 1980  PL 96-510 (com-
  monly  known as  Superfund) mandates in Section 103(c) that
  certain persons  notify the U.S. Environmental Protection
  Agency (EPA) by June  9, 1981  of  the existence of  sites
  where  hazardous wastes from industries,  businesses,  gov-
  ernment, hospitals, and other sources are stored, treated or
  disposed of. This document comprises a listing of 8,755 noti-
  fications of hazardous waste sites. For each notification, the
  listing  summarizes the  location,  the persons  required  to
  notify,  the amount and  type of any hazardous waste to be
  found on the site reported, and any known or suspected re-
  leases  of hazardous wastes. The CERCLA 103(c) notification
  was mandated to help EPA and State and local governments
  remedy problems  created by uncontrolled  hazardous waste
  disposal. This document contains ten  volumes, one for each
  EPA region. Within each volume, the notifications are  pre-
  sented alphabetically by state  and site name within each
  state, respectively.
  Specifications: Also available in set  of 10 reports PC  E99,
  PB82-213984. See also PB82-214065, and  PB82-214081.
  284p.
  Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste dis-
  posal, Comprehensive  environmental  response,  Toxic  sub-
  stances, EPA region 9.

1183  Notification of Hazardous Waste Sites Required
  Under Section 103(c) of the Comprehensive
  Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability
  Act (CERCLA) of 1980: EPA Region  10
  Order Number PB82-214081CDH, price: PC A07/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC; Mar 82
  The Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensa-
  tion, and  Liability Act (CERCLA) of 1980 PL 96-510 (com-
  monly known as Superfund) mandates in Section 103(c)  that
  certain  persons notify the U.S.  Environmental Protection
  Agency (EPA) by  June  9, 1981 of the  existence of sites
  where hazardous wastes from industries, businesses, gov-
  ernment, hospitals, and other sources are stored, treated or
  disposed of. This document comprises a listing of 8,755 noti-
  fications of hazardous waste sites. For each notification, the
  listing  summarizes the  location, the  persons  required to
  notify, the amount and type of any hazardous waste to be
  found on the site reported, and any known or suspected re-
  leases of hazardous wastes. The CERCLA 103(c) notification
  was mandated to help EPA and State and local governments
  remedy  problems  created by uncontrolled hazardous waste
  disposal. This document contains ten volumes, one for each
  EPA region. Within each  volume, the notifications are pre-
  sented alphabetically by  state and site name within each
  state, respectively.
  Specifications: Also available in set of 10 reports PC E99,
  PB82-213984. See also PB82-214073.  142p.
  Subject index keywords: Hazardous  materials, Waste  dis-
  posal, Comprehensive environmental  response, Toxic sub-
  stances, EPA region 10.
                                                                                                             221

-------
TECHNOLOGY POLICY & ADMINISTRATION:
Conference Proceedings
TECHNOLOGY POLICY &

ADMINISTRATION: Conference

proceedings

1184  Annual RREL Research Symposium (20th) Abstract
  Proceedings. Held in Cincinnati, Ohio on March 15-17,
  1994
  Order Number PB94-159092CDH, price: PC A12/MF A03
  Science Applications International Corp., Fort Washington,
  PA.; Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk
  Reduction Engineering Lab; Mar 94
  The Twentieth Annual Risk Reduction Engineering  Laborato-
  ry (RREL) Research Symposium was held in Cincinnati, Ohio,
  March 15-17, 1994. The purpose of this Symposium was to
  present the latest significant research findings from ongoing
  and recently completed projects funded by the Risk Reduc-
  tion Engineering Laboratory. These  Proceedings  are orga-
  nized into two  sections. Part One contains extended  ab-
  stracts of the paper presentations. Part Two contains  ab-
  stracts of the poster displays. Subjects include pollution pre-
  vention demonstrations and life cycle analysis;  remediation
  technologies from the SITE Program,  RREL technologies,
  and oil spills remediation  technologies; drinking water and
  wastewater technologies; municipal solid waste technologies;
  and hazardous waste technologies.
  Specifications: See also PB92-166859. Sponsored by Envi-
  ronmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk Reduction
  Engineering Lab. 255p.
  Subject Index keywords:  Hazardous materials, Waste man-
  agement, Meetings.


TECHNOLOGY POLICY &

ADMINISTRATION: Electronic Tools

1185  Accessing Federal Data Bases for Contaminated
  Site Clean-Up Technologies (Third Edition)
  Order Number PB94-144540CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
  Federal Remediation Technologies Roundtable.;
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC.
  Technology Innovation Office; Oct 93
  Table of Contents: Alternative Treatment Technology Infor-
  mation Center (ATTIC);  Case Study  Data System; Cleanup
  Information Bulletin Board System (CLU-IN); Cost of Remedi-
  al Action (CORA) Mode); Defense Environmental  Electronic
  Bulletin Board System (DEEBBS); Defense RDT&E Online
  System (DROLS); Energy  Science  and  Technology Data
  Base; Environmental Technical  Information  System (ETIS);
  Environmental Technologies Remedial  Actions  Data  Ex-
  change (EnviroTRADE);  Environmental Technology Informa-
  tion System (TIS); Hazardous Waste Superfund  Collection
  Data Base (HWSFD); Installation Restoration Data Manage-
  ment Information System; National  Technical  Information
  Service (NTIS)  Bibliographic Data Base; New  Technology
  from DOE (NTD); Prospective Technology (ProTech) and the
  Technology Catalogue; Records of Decision System (RODS);
  ReOpt: Electronic Encyclopedia of Remedial Action Options;
  Research in  Progress (RIP) Data Base;  RREL Treatability
  Data Base; Soil Transport  and Fate Data Base; Technology
  Integration  System  Support (TISS);  Vendor  Information
  System for Innovative Treatment Technologies (VISITT); and
  Waste Management Information System.
  Specifications:  Supersedes  PB93-145647. Sponsored by
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Technol-
  ogy Innovation Office. 48p.
  Subject index keywords: Waste management,  Technology
  innovation, Pollution control.


TECHNOLOGY POLICY &

ADMINISTRATION: Miscellaneous

Policy & Program Documents

1186  Abstract Proceedings: Forum on Innovative
  Hazardous Waste Treatment Technologies; Domestic
  and International (2nd). Held in Philadelphia,
  Pennsylvania on May 15-17, 1990
  Order Number PB91-145649CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 90
  Contents:  Physical  Chemical Treatment Methods; Thermal
  Treatment; Biological Treatment; Solidification/Stabilization
  Treatment; and Poster Presentations.
  Specifications: Also available from Supt. of Docs. 65p.
  Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste treat-
  ment, Meetings.

1187  Abstract Proceedings: Superfund Technical Support
  Project General Meeting. Held in Athens, Georgia on
  December 3-6, 1990
  Order Number PB93-205862CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
  Environmental Management Support, Silver Spring, MD.;
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Emergency and Remedial Response; May 91
  Contents:  RCRA's  New  Ground-Water Monitoring  Regula-
  tions;  Remedial  Response Construction Cost  Estimating
  System (RACES); The Data Base Analyzer and Parameter
  Estimator  (DBAPE);  Superfund Technical Liaison Program;
  Causes and Effects of Well Turbidity; Characterizing Hetero-
  geneous Hazardous Wastes; Superfund Innovative Technolo-
  gy Evaluation (SITE) Program; Computer-Aided Assessment
  of Contaminated Sites; Remedy Screening; New  Engineering
  Forum Issue Papers; Fourier Transform  Infrared Spectrosco-
  py (FT-IR); Metal Partitioning From Incineration of Soils and
  Debris; Treatability Assistance Program Update;  Data Gaps
  in  Remedial Design; The Pre-Design  Technical Summary;
  Remedial  Design  Schedule Management;  Fate Constants
  and Pathway Analysis; Identification  of non-Target Analytes;
  Dense Non-Aqueous Phase Liquids; MINTEQA2  Geochemi-
  cal Equilibrium Model; Corps of Engineers  Laboratory Sup-
  port to  EPA Regions; Subsurface Characterization and Mobi-
  lization Processes (SCAMP); Overview of Athens' Modeling
  Capabilities; Predicting Chemical Reactivity by Computer; Ra-
  diation  Technical Support to Regional  Superfund Programs;
  Design of  Groundwater Monitoring Networks.
  Specifications: See also PB92-205657. Sponsored by Envi-
  ronmental  Protection Agency,  Washington,  DC. Office  of
  Emergency and Remedial Response. 40p.
  Subject index keywords: Meetings, Superfund, Waste man-
  agement, Water pollution, Hazardous materials.
222

-------
                                                                    TECHNOLOGY POLICY & ADMINISTRATION:
                                                                    Miscellaneous Policy & Program Documents
1188  Accessing Federal Data Bases for Contaminated
  Site Clean-Up Technologies
  Order Number PB91-921288CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Emergency and Remedial Response; May 91
  The document is a reference tool  that provides information
  on those systems maintaining data  on remedial technologies.
  It may be used by Project Managers as a pointer to reposi-
  tories of technical information, or  as a source  of contacts
  that may be useful to future system design. Each data base
  profile  contains information  on  specific  data  elements,
  system  uses,  hardware and software requirements,  and
  access. The profiles also include Agency contacts for each
  system should more detailed information be required.
  Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
  posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
  and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
  paper copy or microfiche. 29p.
  Subject index keywords: Sites, Hazardous  materials, Data
  aquisition, Pollution control, Superfund.

1189   Accessing Federal Data Bases for Contaminated
  Site Clean-Up Technologies (Second Edition)
  Order Number PB93-145647CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
  Federal Remediation Technologies  Roundtable.;
  Environmental  Protection Agency, Washington, DC.
  Technology Innovation Office; Aug 92
  The  Federal  Remediation Technologies Roundtable  devel-
  oped this publication to provide information on accessing
  Federal data bases that contain data on  innovative remedi-
  ation technologies. This document  updates and expands in-
  formation  presented in  the  first edition published in 1991.
  This document is a reference too!  that provides information
  on those systems maintaining data  on remedial technologies.
  It may  be used by project managers as a pointer to reposi-
  tories of  technical information, or  as a source of contacts
  that may be useful to future  system design. Each data base
  profile contains information on data elements, system uses,
  hardware and software  requirements, and access. The pro-
  files also contain contacts for each  system. A matrix showing
  system characteristics of the data bases included in this doc-
  ument is provided.
  Specifications: See also PB91-921288. Sponsored by Envi-
  ronmental Protection  Agency, Washington, DC. Technology
  Innovation Office. 52p.
  Subject index keywords: Remedial action,  Technology in-
  novation,  Information systems,  Waste management,  Data
  bases, Cleanup operations.
1190  Accutech Pneumatic Fracturing Extraction and Hot
  Gas Injection, Phase 1. Applications Analysis Report
  Order Number PB94-117439CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
  Science Applications International Corp., Hackensack, NJ.;
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Emergency and Remedial Response; Mar 93
  The report summarizes and analyzes the SITE demonstration
  of Accutech's Pneumatic Fracturing Extraction (PFE) process
  at an industrial park in NJ. Based on the results of 4-hr tests
  before and after fracturing, extracted air flow rate increased
  an average 600% and trichloroethene (TCE) mass removal
  rate increased about 675%, primarily due to the increased air
  flow. The  radius for effective vapor extraction also is en-
  larged by fracturing; extracted air flow rates increased 700%
  to 1,400% in wells at a  10 ft radius and 200% to 1,100% in
  wells 20 ft from the fracture well. With passive air inlets, the
  extracted air flow rate increased about  19,500%,  and TCE
  mass removal rate increased 2,300%. The estimated cost for
  full-scale remediation  of  the  site  with  PFE  was $307/kg
  ($140/lb) of TCE removed based on the  SITE  demonstration
  experience and information provided by the developer. Major
  contributing factors were: Labor (29%); Capital Equipment
  (22); and  Emissions  Collection/disposal (19%).  Numerous
  assumptions were used in arriving at this  cost.  Results of two
  Hot Gas Injection (HGI) tests were inconclusive.
  Specifications:   Sponsored  by  Environmental  Protection
  Agency, Washington, DC. Office of Emergency and  Remedial
  Response. 59p.
  Subject index keywords: Pneumatic fracturing extraction,
  Gas injection, Superfund, Trichloroethylene,  Superfund Inno-
 .vative Technology Evaluation.

1191  Advancing the Use of Treatment Technologies for
  Superfund Remedies
  Order Number PB90-272659CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington,  DC. Office of
  Emergency and Remedial Response; 21 Feb 89
 .The directive reaffirms the use of treatment technologies at
  Superfund sites and  summarizes  guidance  documents  and
  activities that  encourage and support the use of innovative
  treatment technologies.
  Specifications:  10p.
  Subject index .keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste treat-
  ment, Superfund, Waste management, Office of Solid Waste
  and Emergency Response, Remedial action.

1192  Alternating Current Electrocoagulation  for
  Superfund Site Remediation
  Order Number PB93-205144CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
  Electro-Pure Systems, Inc., Amherst, NY.; Environmental
  Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk Reduction
  Engineering Lab; c1993
  The technical and economical feasibility of alternating  current
  electrocoagulation (ACE) was evaluated for  a  2-year  period.
  ACE is  an electrochemical technology where highly-charged
  aluminum polyhydroxide species are introduced into aqueous
  media for the removal  of suspended solids, oil droplets,  and
  soluble  ionic pollutants. ACE can break stable aqueous  col-
  loidal suspensions of up to 10% total solids and stable emul-
  sions containing up to 5% oil. Major • operating  parameters
  have been defined for different classes of effluents based on
  experimental results using complex synthetic soil slurries  and
  metals.  Test results indicate that ACE produces aqueous  and
  solid separations comparable to those produced by chemical
  flocculent additions,  but with  reduced filtration times  and
  sludge  volumes. The  technology has application where re-
  moval of soluble and  suspended pollutants from effluents is
  required, and in the recovery of fine-grained  products from
  process streams. The  technology however, has not yet been
  demonstrated  at  full-scale for Superfund site remediation.
  Summarized are the principal  results of  the SITE  research
  program and results  of ACE  treatment  on some different
  classes of industrial effluents, not part of the SITE  Program.
  Specifications:  Pub.  in Jnl. of Air and Waste Management
  Association, 1993. See also PB-143 652.  Sponsored by Envi-
  ronmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk Reduction
  Engineering Lab. 8p.
                                                                                                               223

-------
TECHNOLOGY POLICY & ADMINISTRATION:
Miscellaneous Policy & Program Documents
  Subject  Index keywords:  Electrocoagulation,  Hazardous
  materials, Waste treatment.
1193  American Combustion Pyretron Destruction System.
  Applications Analysis Report
  Order Number PB90-258427CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
  Acurex Corp., Jefferson, AR.; Environmental Protection
  Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk Reduction Engineering Lab; Jun
  89
  The report analyzes American Combustion's Pyretron oxygen
  enhanced burner  system. The  report discusses  information
  on the economical advantages of this type of incineration for
  use in assessments at uncontrolled hazardous waste sites.
  Specifications: See  also PB89-167894. Sponsored by Envi-
  ronmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk Reduction
  Engineering Lab. 54p.
  Subject index keywords: Incinerators, Waste disposal, Haz-
  ardous materials, Kilns, Superfund program, Remedial action.
1194  Application of a Plant Test System in the
  Identification of Potential Genetic Hazards at Chemical
  Waste Sites
  Order Number PB92-124551CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
  Health Effects Research Lab., Research Triangle Park, NC.
  Genetic Toxicology Div. Environmental Health Research and
  Testing, Inc., Research Triangle Park, NC; 1991
  The authors utilized  the  Tradescantia micronucleus  (Trad-
  MCN) assay for evaluating genetic  hazards  at  a chemical
  waste site contaminated with agricultural insecticides sched-
  uled for clean-up  under the Superfund program. The chemi-
  cal analysis of soil samples from the site indicates presence
  of lindane (17 mg/kg), beta BHC (13 mg/kg), and heptachlor
  (0.4 mg/kg)  in the subsurface  sample.  Tradescantia plants
  were planted at five locations to evaluate  the mutagenic ef-
  fects of the total environment, i.e., soil, water, and air. In ad-
  dition, stem cuttings were also  placed at these locations to
  sample the genetic impact of vapor phase organics in the at-
  mosphere. The surface and subsurface samples were  ob-
  tained from these locations for  their chemical and  biological
  analysis in the laboratory. The  results of the Tradescantia
  planted  on the site, as well as the stem cuttings exposed on
  the test site, showed significantly higher frequencies of mi-
  cronuclei from contaminated plots before remediation; but no
  genetic  activity was detected after the remedial action. The
  plants exposed to the soil samples  in the  laboratory yielded
  nonsignificant  results except for one  subsurface sample
  before remediation and two  surface samples after remedi-
  ation.
  Specifications:  Pub. in American  Society for Testing and
  Materials - Plants  for  Toxicity Assessment: Philadelphia, PA.,
  pp309-317 1991. Prepared in cooperation with Environmental
  Health Research and Testing, Inc.,  Research Triangle Park,
  NC. 11 p.
  Subject    index   keywords:    Toxicity,     Mutagens,
  Plants(Botany), Chemical waste sites.
1195  Application of Tradescantia Micronucleus Assay for
  In situ Evaluation of Potential Genetic Hazards from
  Exposure to Chemicals at a Wood-Preserving Site
  Order Number PB92-217231 CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
  Health Effects Research Lab., Research Triangle Park, NC.
  Genetic Toxicology Div. Environmental Health Research and
  Testing, Inc., Research Triangle Park, NC; c1991
  In situ evaluation of biological hazards from wood preserving
  chemicals at a hazardous waste site using the Tradescantia
  micronucleus assay (Trad-MCN) is reported in the study. The
  chemical  analysis of soil samples from the site showed high
  contamination with arsenic (1,292 mg/kg), chromium  (1,444
  mg/kg) and copper (924 mg/kg) on the surface of the drip
  area where wood was allowed  to dry after the treatment. Ex-
  posure  of Tradescantia plants grown within or adjacent to
  the  drip area showed significantly (P=0.05) higher frequen-
  cies  of  micronuclei when  compared to  plants  grown  in
  nearby control plots. After remediation, the levels of arsenic,
  chromium, and copper were substantially reduced and con-
  comitantly no  genotoxic  activity  was observed  in  plants
  grown on-site or in  plants exposed in the laboratory to a
  slurry of soil samples from the  site. The results from the pilot
  study show that simple plant assays such as Trad-MCN can
  be used as a sentinel for environmental contamination and
  to assess the efficacy of clean-up efforts.
  Specifications:   Pub. in Hazardous Waste and  Hazardous
  Materials, v8 n3 p257-262  Sep 91.  Prepared in cooperation
  with Environmental Health  Research and Testing, Inc., Re-
  search Triangle Park, NC. 8p.
  Subject index keywords: Wood preservatives, Superfund,
  Waste disposal, Biological effects, Bioassay, Hazardous ma-
  terials.
1196  Applications Analysis Report: SITE Program, CF
  Systems  Organics Extraction System, New Bedford,
  Massachusetts
  Order Number PB91-113845CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
  Science Applications International Corp., McLean, VA.;
  Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk
  Reduction Engineering Lab; Aug 90
  The report summarizes the results of a Superfund Innovative
  Technology Evaluation (SITE) demonstration of the CF Sys-
  tems critical fluid organics extraction system at the New Bed-
  ford Harbor, Mass., Superfund  site.  It also provides a  review
  of those conditions which this  technology is best suited for,
  as well as comments by CF Systems Corp. The technology
  depends  on the ability of organic pollutants to solubilize in
  the  process solvent,  a liquified  gas. The pollutants treated in-
  clude polychlorinated biphenyls (PCB's) and polynuclear aro-
  matic hydrocarbons.
  Specifications:    Sponsored  by  Environmental Protection
  Agency,  Cincinnati,  OH. Risk Reduction  Engineering Lab.
  74p.
  Subject index keywords: Organic compounds,  Hazardous
  materials, Extraction, New Bedford Harbor, Superfund.
224

-------
                                                                    TECHNOLOGY POLICY & ADMINISTRATION;
                                                                    Miscellaneous Policy & Program Documents
1197  Assessment of International Technologies for
  Superfund Applications: Technology Review and Trip
  Report Results
  Order Number PB90-106428CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
  Alliance Technologies Corp., Bedford, MA.; Environmental
  Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of Solid Waste
  and Emergency Response; Sep 88
  Several international technologies were identified and investi-
  gated for their applicability to hazardous waste site remedi-
  ation in the United States. The field team visited with twelve
  research  groups, consultants and manufacturers at 15 loca-
  tions in The  Netherlands, Belgium and the Federal Republic
  of Germany  (FRG).  Results  of the individual site visits are
  summarized  and  a capsule summary of each technology in-
  cludes a brief process description, discussion of process limi-
  tations, performance data, costs, and status of process de-
  velopment. Identified were site cleanup technologies not cur-
  rently used  in the U.S., as  well as unique applications of
  techniques used  in the U.S. Among the most important find-
  ings were five different  soil  washing techniques in Holland
,  and the the  FRG. Another key finding was the High Temper-
  ature Slagging Incinerator technology reviewed in Belgium. In
  addition,  the field team  reviewed unique applications of in
  situ biological treatment and composting techniques, vacuum
  extraction and in situ air  stripping, in situ extraction of cadmi-
  um from  soils, application  of rotating biological contractors,
  and electrochemical dehalogenation techniques.
  Specifications:  See also PB89-205959. Sponsored by Envi-
  ronmental Protection Agency, Washington,  DC.  Office of
  Solid Waste  and  Emergency Response. 53p.
  Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Technology
  assessment, Waste disposal, Foreign technology, Superfund
  program, Remedial action, Environmental research.
1198 Assessment of Technologies for the Remediation of
  Radioactively Contaminated Superfund Sites
  Order Number PB90-204140CDH, price: PC A06/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Emergency and Remedial Response; Jan 90
  The report is a screening evaluation of information needs for
  the development of generic treatability studies for the reme-
  diation of Superfund Radiation Sites on the National Priorities
  List (NPL). It presents a categorization of  the 25 radiation
  sites currently proposed  or listed on the NPL, and provides  a
  rating system for evaluating  technologies that may be used
  to remediate these  sites. It  also identifies  gaps in site as-
  sessment and  technology  data and  provides information
  about and recommendations for technology development.
  Specifications:  116p.
  Subject  index  keywords: Radioactive wastes,  Hazardous
  materials, Waste disposal, Superfund program.

1199  Assessment of Tentatively Identified Compounds in
  Superfund Samples
  Order Number PB90-253816CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
  Environmental Research Lab., Athens, GA; Jun 90
  Stored mass spectral data for  27 semivolatile samples ana-
  lyzed by 7 private laboratories under contract with the U.S.
  Environmental Protection Agency were reanalyzed at the En-
  vironmental  Research Laboratory, Athens,  GA (AERL). Re-
  sults of the  reanalysis were compared with the original con-
  tract laboratory data. In  instances where specific compound
  identifications had  been  made  by a contract  laboratory,
  AERL identifications agreed 36% of the time, disagreed with
  the identification 11 % of the time, disagreed on the presence
  of the GC peak 19% of the time,  or concluded  that data
  were insufficient for identification 34% of the time.
  Specifications:  9p.
  Subject index keywords:  Site surveys, Hazardous materi-
  als, Chemical analysis, Waste disposal, Superfund, Tentative-
  ly identified compounds.

1200  Asymmetric Loss Function for Superfund
  Remediation Decisions
  Order Number PB93-106763CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
  Environmental Monitoring Systems Lab., Las Vegas, NV;
  1992
  At a  Superfund  remediation site the decision is a classifica-
  tion problem,  discriminating between polluted blocks to be
  remediated and  background blocks to be left untreated.  The
  concentration  of the  pollutant  in a block is estimated from
  sampling. The more samples taken the better the estimates,
  but what is the optimum sample size. The errors are comput-
  ed by subtracting the estimate from the block averages of an
  exhaustive sampling.  The time-honored least squares algo-
  rithm is the obvious way to  evaluate a given sample size, but
  least squares assumes a symmetric loss function. Superfund
  remediation has an asymmetric cost-plus-loss function; false
  positives  (clean  blocks judged dirty) have  a relatively small
  fixed cost while  false  negative (polluted blocks judged clean)
  have public-health-losses  that increase with concentration.
  Minimizing an asymmetric cost-plus-loss function will find a
  different optimum sample size than would the traditional least
  squares approach.
  Specifications:  See also PB90-155581. 8p.
  Subject index keywords: Superfund, Remedial action, Envi-
  ronmental monitoring, Sampling, Waste  management, Loss
  function.

1201  AutoMOUSE: An Improvement to the MOUSE
  Computerized Uncertainty Analysis System Operational
  Manual
  Order Number PB93-100113CDH, price: PC A10/MF A03
  Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk
  Reduction Engineering Lab; Aug 92
  Under a mandate of national environmental laws, the agency
  strives to formulate and implement actions  leading to a com-
  patible  balance  between human activities  and the ability of
  natural systems to support  and nurture life. The Risk Reduc-
  tion Engineering Laboratory is responsible for planning, im-
  plementing, and managing  research development, and dem-
  onstration programs to provide an authoritative, defensible
  engineering basis  in support of the policies, programs,  and
  regulations  of  the  EPA  with  respect  to drinking  water,
  wastewater, pesticides,  toxic substances, solid and hazard-
  ous wastes, and Superfund-related activities. The publication
  is one of the  products of that research and provides a vital
  communication  link between the researcher  and  the  user
  community. The manual describes a system, called MOUSE
  (for Modular Oriented Uncertainty SystEm), for dealing  with
  the  computational problems of uncertainty,  specifically  in
  models that consist of a set of one or more equations. Since
  such models are frequently encountered in the fields of envi-
  ronmental science, risk analysis,  economics, and engineer-
  ing,  the  system  has broad  application  throughout these
  fields. An important  part  of the MOUSE system is Auto-
  MOUSE  which  actually writes the computer programs re-
                                                                                                                225

-------
 TECHNOLOGY POLICY & ADMINISTRATION:
 Miscellaneous Policy & Program Documents
  quired for the uncertainty analysis computations. Thus, no
  prior  programming knowledge is  needed  to  learn or use
  MOUSE  and,  because of its transportability and compact-
  ness, the system can be run on a wide variety of personal
  computers  available  to  the  U.S.  Environmental  Protection
  Agency and/or its contractors and grantees.
  Specifications:  For system  on diskette, see PB93-500007.
  21 Op.
  Subject  index  keywords:  Environmental  impact  assess-
  ments, Environmental engineering, Risk assessment, User
  manuals(Computer programs), AutoMOUSE system, Modular
  Oriented  Uncertainty System.

 1202   AWD Technologies Integrated AquaDetox (Trade
  Name)/SVE Technology: Applications Analysis Report
  Order Number PB92-218379CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH.  Risk
  Reduction Engineering Lab; Oct 91
  In support  of the  U.S.  Environmental Protection Agency's
  (EPA)  Superfund Innovative  Technology  Evaluation  (SITE)
  Program, the report evaluates the AWD Technologies,  Inc.,
  integrated AquaDetox/SVE treatment system for simultane-
  ous on-site treatment of  contaminated groundwater and soil-
  gas. The AWD  technology uses  an AquaDetox moderate
  vacuum  steam  stripping system  to  treat  contaminated
  groundwater and a soil vapor extraction (SVE) system that
  uses granular activated carbon (GAG) beds to treat soil-gas.
  The  t^vo systems  are looped together  to  form a closed
  system with no  emissions. The report evaluates both the
  treatment efficiency and economic  data  based  on results
  from the SITE demonstrated and describes  several  case
  studies,
  Specifications: See also PB92-124387. 68p.
  Subject  index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
  Land  pollution control, Water  pollution control,  Hazardous
  materials, AquaDetox/SVE treatment system.

 1203   Babcock and Wilcox Cyclone Furnace Vitrification.
  Technology Demonstration Summary
  Order Number PB93-145621CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk
  Reduction Engineering Lab; Sep 92
  A Superfund Innovative Technology Evaluation (SITE) Dem-
  onstration of the  Babcock and Wilcox Cyclone Furnace Vitri-
  fication Technology was  conducted in November  1991. This
  Demonstration occurred  at the Babcock and Wilcox (B and
  W) Alliance Research  Center (ARC) in Alliance, OH. The B
  and W cyclone furnace may be used for thermal treatment of
  soils contaminated with organics, metals, and radionuclides.
  The cyclone furnace is designed to destroy organic contami-
  nants and to immobilize  metals and radionuclides in a vitri-
  fied soil matrix (slag).
  Specifications:  See also PB92-222215, PB92-222223, and
  PB93-122315. 8p.
  Subject index keywords: Technology innovation, Soil treat-
  ment, Hazardous materials, Vitrification, Radioactive materi-
  als, Superfund Innovative Technology Evaluation Program, B
  and W cyclone furnace.
1204  Behavior of Arsenic in a Rotary Kiln Incinerator
  (Journal Version)
  Order Number PB92-179845CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
  Acurex Corp., Jefferson, AR.; Environmental Protection
  Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk Reduction Engineering Lab;
  C1992
                           ii
  A series of pilot scale incineration tests were performed at
  EPA's  Incineration  Researcfi Facility (IRF) to evaluate the
  fate of arsenic when fed to a rotary kiln incinerator. In  addi-
  tion to  parametric tests, an arsenic-containing soil from a Su-
  perfund site was also fed to the same incinerator. The oper-
  ation of the incinerator and the resulting test conditions  were
  similar. The data showed that arsenic when incinerated tends
  to partition to the bottom ash.  However, as the temperature
  in the kiln rises, the amount of  arsenic partitioning to the ash
  decreases.  With  regard  to  the  Superfund soil, the TCLP
  values  for arsenic went down as the oxygen level  in the kiln
  increased.  Afterburner temperature and  chlorine concentra-
  tion in  the waste did not appear to have any effect on the
  partitioning of arsenic.
  Specifications:  Pub. in Jnl. of Air and Waste Management
  Association,  v42 n2 p179-184 Feb 92. See also PB91-
  131656. Sponsored by  Environmental  Protection  Agency,
  Cincinnati, OH. Risk Reduction  Engineering Lab. 8p.
  Subject index keywords: Arsenic, Waste disposal, Inciner-
  ators.

1205  BEN: A Model to Calculate the Economic Benefits of
  Noncompliance. User's Manual (Revised)
  Order Number PB94-141652CDH, price: PC A10/MF A03
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Enforcement; Dec 93
  The manual  is to  be used  with  the BEN computer model
  which calculates the economic  benefit a violator derives from
  delaying or avoiding compliance with environmental statutes.
  In general, EPA  uses the BEN computer model to  assist its
  staff in developing settlement penalty figures. While the pri-
  mary purpose of the BEN  model is to calculate the after tax
  net  present  value  of a pollution  prevention or  mitigation
  project and to calculate 'cash outs' in Superfund cases.
  Specifications:  Supersedes PB92-230358. 201 p.
  Subject index keywords: Pollution abatement,  Superfund,
  Benefit cost analysis.

1206  Bibliography of Federal Reports and Publications
  Describing Alternative and Innovative Treatment
  Technologies for Corrective Action and Site
  Remediation
  Order Number PB91-921293CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Emergency and Remedial Response; May 91
  The Federal Remediation Technologies Roundtable devel-
  oped this bibliography to publicize the accessibility of Federal
  documents pertaining to innovative and  alternative  technol-
  ogies to treat hazardous wastes. The bibliography contains
  references for documents and reports from the U.S.  Environ-
  mental  Protection Agency (EPA), the U.S. Army,  the  U.S.
  Army Corps of Engineers, the U.S. Navy, the  U.S. Air Force,
  the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), and the U.S. Depart-
  ment of Interior (DOI), Bureau  of Reclamation. The publica-
  tion contains references and| order information for reports on
  research concerning the application of innovative and alter-
226

-------
                                                                     TECHNOLOGY POLICY & ADMINISTRATION:
                                                                     Miscellaneous Policy & Program Documents
  native hazardous waste treatment options. The bibliography
  is scheduled to undergo periodic revisions.
  Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
  posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
  and Mexico; all  others $400). Single copies also available in
  paper copy or microfiche. 29p.
  Subject index  keywords: Sites, Hazardous materials, Re-
  search management, Bibliographies.

1207  Carver-Greenfield Process (Trade Name) Dehydro-
  Tech Corporation. Applications Analysis Report
  Order Number PB93-101152CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
  PRC Environmental Management, Inc., Cincinnati, OH.;
  Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk
  Reduction Engineering Lab; Sep 92
  The  report  evaluates  the  Dehydro-Tech Corporation's
  Carver-Greenfield (C-G) Process and focuses on the technol-
  ogy's ability to separate waste mixtures into their constituent
  solid, organic and water fractions while producing a solid re-
  sidual that  meets  applicable  disposal  requirements.  The
  report presents performance and economic data from the
  U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Superfund Innovative
  Technology Evaluation (SITE) demonstration and three case
  studies. The C-G Process demonstration was conducted as a
  part of the SITE Program at the Risk Reduction Engineering
  Laboratory's Releases Control Branch facility in Edison,  New
  Jersey, using drilling mud waste from the  PAB Oil Superfund
  site jn Abbeville, Louisiana. The system generated a treated
  solids product that passed Toxicity Characteristic Leaching
  Procedure  (TCLP)  criteria for volatiles,  semivolatiles  and
  metals. Potential wastes that might be treated by the tech-
  nology include  industrial  residues,  Resource Conservation
  and Recovery  Act  wastes,  Superfund  wastes and  other
 •wastes contaminated  with organic compounds. Economic
  analyses  indicate that  the cost of using the C-G process is
  about  $523/ton of which $302 is for site-specific expenses.
  Specifications:  See also PB92-217462. Sponsored by Envi-
  ronmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk Reduction
  Engineering Lab. 49p.
  Subject  index  keywords:  Waste  treatment,  Separation
  processes,  Solvent extraction, Hazardous materials,  Innova-
  tive treatment technologies, Carver-Greenfield process.

1208  CASHOUT Model: Calculates Current Value of
  Superfund  Cleanup Costs (Version 1.2)  (for
  Microcomputers)
  Order Number PB94-501012CDH, price: D02
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Enforcement; Dec 93
  CASHOUT  determines in  current year dollars what all the
  future clean-up costs of a Superfund site will be. Since those
  costs could be as much as 50 years in the future, this allows
  the enforcement professionals in the Superfund  program to
  quickly determine what the total current  cost of a clean-up
  would be. Then they can use that number to  'cashout' of the
  case the  small contributors. The small  contributors just pay
  an appropriate portion of the CASHOUT number, and then
  they are out of the case. The other contributors usually are
  responsible for the site for a substantial amount of time.
  Specifications:  The software is on one 3 1/2 inch diskette,
  720K double density.  Documentation included;  may be or-
  dered  separately as PB94-141678. Software valid through
  August 1994 when an  updated  issue  will be released.
  System: DOS operating system. Requires 69K of hard drive
  space. 1 diskette.
  Subject index keywords: Superfund, Costs, Software.

1209  Chemical Dehalogenation Treatabiiity Studies under
  CERCLA: An Overview
  Order Number PB92-169275CDH, price: PC  A03/MF A01
  IT Corp., Sharonville, OH.; Environmental Protection Agency,
  Cincinnati, OH. Risk Reduction Engineering Lab; May 92
  Systematically conducted, well-documented treatability stud-
  ies  are an  important component of remedy evaluation and
  selection under the Superfund  program. The fact sheet fo-
  cuses on chemical dehalogenation treatability studies con-
  ducted in support of remedy selection that is conducted prior
  to the Record of Decision (ROD). The fact  sheet presents  a
  standard guide for designing and implementing  a chemical
  dehalogenation treatability study. The manual presents a de-
  scription of and discusses the applicability and limitations of
  chemical dehalogenation technologies and  defines the pre-
  screening and field measurement data needed to determine
  if treatability testing is required. It also presents an overview
  of the process of conducting treatability tests and the appli-
  cability of tiered treatability testing for evaluation of chemical
  dehalogenation technologies. The specific goals of each tier
  of testing are defined and performance levels are presented
  that should be met at the remedy screening level before ad-
  ditional tests are conducted at the next tier.  The elements of
  a treatability study work  plan are also defined with detailed
  discussions on  the design and execution of the treatability
  study.
  Specifications: See also PB92-169044. Sponsored by Envi-
  ronmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk Reduction
  Engineering Lab. 10p.
  Subject index keywords: Waste management, Environmen-
  tal surveys, Hazardous materials, Superfund, Office of Solid
  Waste and Emergency Response.

1210  Chemical Dehalogenation Treatment: APEG
  Treatment
  Order Number PB91-228031CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
  Science Applications International Corp., Cincinnati, OH.;
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 90
  The chemical dehalogenation system discussed in the report
  is alkaline metal hydroxide/polyethylene glycol (APEG) which
  is applicable to aromatic halogenated compounds. The metal
  hydroxide that has been most  widely  used for this reagent
  preparation is potassium hydroxide (KOH) in conjunction with
  polyethylene  glycol (PEG)   (typically,   average  molecular
  weight of 400 Daltons) to form a polymeric  alkoxide referred
  to as KPEG. However, sodium hydroxide has also been used
  in the past and most  likely will find increasing  use  in the
  future because of patent applications that have been filed for
  modification  to this technology. This  new approach will
  expand the technology's applicability and efficacy and should
  reduce chemical costs by facilitating the use of less costly
  sodium hydroxide. A variation of  this reagent is the use of
  potassium   hydroxide  or  sodium  hydroxide/tetraethylene
  glycol, referred to as ATEG, that is more effective on haloge-
  nated aliphatic compounds. In some KPEG  reagent formula-
  tions, dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) is  added to enhance reac-
  tion rate kinetics, presumably by improving rates of extraction
  of the haloaromatic contaminants. Previously developed de-
                                                                                                               227

-------
TECHNOLOGY POLICY & ADMINISTRATION:
Miscellaneous Policy & Program Documents
  halogenation reagents involved dispersion of metallic sodium
  In oil or the use of highly reactive organosodium compounds.
  The reactivity of  metallic sodium and these other reagents
  with water  presented a serious  limitation to treating  many
  waste matrices; therefore, these other reagents are not dis-
  cussed in this bulletin  and are not considered APEG proc-
  esses.
  Specifications:   Sponsored by  Environmental  Protection
  Agency, Washington, DC. Office of Emergency  and Remedial
  Response. 8p.
  Subject Index keywords: Waste treatment, Dehalogenation,
  Aromatic compounds, Halogen organic compounds, Chemi-
  cal treatment

1211  Chemical Oxidation Treatment. Engineering Bulletin
  Order Number PB92-180066CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington,  DC. Office of
  Emergency and Remedial Response; Oct 91
  Oxidation destroys hazardous contaminants by  chemically
  converting them to nonhazardous or less toxic compounds
  that are ideally more stable, less mobile, and/or inert. How-
  ever, under some conditions, other  hazardous compounds
  may be formed. The oxidizing agents most commonly used
  for the treatment of hazardous contaminants are ozone, hy-
  drogen peroxide,  hypochlorites,  chlorine, and  chlorine diox-
  ide. Current research has shown the combination of  these
  reagents or ultraviolet  (UV) light and an oxidizing agent(s)
  makes  the  process more effective. Treatability studies  are
  necessary to  document the applicability and performance of
  chemical  oxidation systems technology for a specific site.
  The bulletin provides information on the technology applica-
  bility, limitations,  a technology description, the types of re-
  siduals produced, site  requirements, current performance
  data, status of the technology, and sources of further infor-
  mation.
  Specifications: See also PB90-198177. 10p.
  Subject index keywords: Oxidation, Waste treatment, Haz-
  ardous materials,  Remedial action, Water pollution control,
  Superfund, Chemical treatment.
       ,:' '        '   ij'ii  , '•«!
1212  Chemical Stabilization of Mixed Organic and Metal
  Compounds. EPA SITE Program Demonstration of the
  Silicate Technology Corporation Process
  Order Number PB93-131787CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk
  Reduction Engineering Lab; c1992
  In  November 1990, the Silicate Technology  Corporation's
  (STC) proprietary process for treating soil contaminated with
  toxic semivolatile  organic and inorganic contaminants was
  evaluated in a Superfund  Innovative  Technology  Evaluation
  (SITE) field demonstration at the Selma Pressure Treatment
  (SPT) wood preserving  site in Selma, California. The SPT site
  was contaminated principally with pentachlorophenol  (PCP)
  and arsenic,  as well as jesser amounts of chromium and
  copper.  Because of their  importance when selecting a
  remedy for  the site, PCP and arsenic were identified as criti-
  cal  analytes  to  evaluate  the effectiveness  of  treatment.
  (Copyright (c) 1992 Air & Waste Management Association.)
  Specifications: Pub. in Jnl.  of the Air and Waste Manage-
  ment Association, v42 n5 p724-728 May 92. 7p.
  Subject index keywords: Superfund, Soil treatment, Reme-
  dial action,  Wood preservatives, Waste treatment, Innovative
  treatment technologies.
1213  Chemical Waste Management, Inc. PO*WW*ER
  (Trade Name) Evaporation-Catalytic Oxidation
  Technology. Technology Evaluation Report. Volume 1
  Order Number PB94-160637CDH, price: PC A08/MF A02
  PRC Environmental Management, Inc., Chicago, IL;
  Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk
  Reduction Engineering Lab; Sep 92
  As part of the Superfund Innovative Technology Evaluation
  (SITE) Program, the U.S. Environmental Protection  Agency
  (EPA) demonstrated  the Chemical Waste  Management, Inc.
  (CWM), PO*WW*ER(tm)  technology. The SITE demonstra-
  tion was  conducted in September 1992 at CWM's  Lake
  Charles Treatment Center (LCTC) site in Lake Charles,  Lou-
  isiana.  During   the  demonstration,  the  PO*WW*ER(tm)
  system treated landfill leachate contaminated with volatile or-
  ganic compounds (VOC), semivolatile  organic  compounds
  (SVOC), metals,  ammonia, cyanide,  and  other inorganic  con-
  taminants. SITE demonstration results show that during treat-
  ment in the PO*WW*ER(tm) system, the volume of the land-
  fill leachate was  significantly reduced. A total solids (TS)  con-
  centration ratio of 32 to 1 was achieved.  The SITE  demon-
  stration results also  show that the  PO*WW*ER(tm) system
  effectively  removed  sources  of toxicity such  as VOCs,
  SVOCs, metals, ammonia, and cyanide.  Concentrations of
  VOCs and  SVOCs  in  product  condensate  exiting  the
  PO*WW*ER(tm) system were below their respective detec-
  tion limits of 5 to 10 micrograms per liter (micrograms/L) and
  10 to 130 micrograms/L.
  Specifications:  See also PB94-124658,  PB91-127415 and
  Volume 2, PB94-160660. Sponsored by Environmental  Pro-
  tection Agency,  Cincinnati, OH. Risk Reduction Engineering
  Lab. 167p.
  Subject  index  keywords:  Chemical  wastes,  Superfund,
  Waste treatment,  Water pollution   control,  Liquid  wastes,
  PO*WW*ER System, Innovative treatment technologies.

1214  Chemical Waste Management, Inc. PO*WW*ER
  (Trade Name) Evaporation-Catalytic Oxidation
  Technology. Technology Evalution Report. Volume 2
  Order Number PB94-160660CDH, price: PC A21/MF A04
  PRC Environmental Management, Inc., Chicago, IL.;
  Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk
  Reduction Engineering Lab; Nov 93
  The PRC SITE Team conducted sampling and analysis for
  the  SITE demonstration  of  the  Chemical Waste Manage-
  ment, Inc.  (CWM) PO*WW*ER process  at the Lake  Charles
  Treatment Center in Carlyss, Louisiana.  Samples were col-
  lected on  September  24, 25, 26,  28,  29,  and  30, 1992.
  During the  first three  days  of sampling, the PO*WW*ER
  process operated with natural (unspiked) feed waste. For the
  last three days of sampling, the feed waste was spiked with
  sulfate salts of cadmium, copper, nickel,  iron and mercury,
  and with phenol, toluene, tetrachloroethene, and methylene
  chloride. This report  presents results and  quality assurance/
  quality control (QA/QC) data for samples analyzed by  Engi-
  neering-Science, Inc., along with vent gas emission rate and
  volumetric concentration results calculated from Ross analyt-
  ical  data. Analytical results are presented in Section 2.0. QA/
  QC  results  are presented in Section 3.0. Re-extraction and
  reanalysis  results for brine samples are presented and dis-
  cussed in Section 4.0. Appendix A contains chain of  custody
  forms associated with the samples,  and Appendix B contains
  a key to sample  identification.
228

-------
                                                                    TECHNOLOGY POLICY & ADMINISTRATION:
                                                                    Miscellaneous Policy & Program Documents
  Specifications:  See also Volume  1, PB94-160637. Spon-
  sored by Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH.
  Risk Reduction Engineering Lab. 500p.
  Subject  index keywords: Chemical  wastes,  Superfund,
  Waste  treatment,  Liquid wastes,  Water pollution sampling,
  PO*WW*ER System, Innovative treatment technologies.
1215   Cleanup Information Bulletin Board System Users
  Guide. (CLU-IN: Cleanup Information Bulletin Board)
  Order Number PB93-194025CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Feb 93
  The  Cleanup Information (CLU-IN)  Bulletin  Board System
  (BBS) is designed for hazardous waste cleanup professionals
  to use  for finding information  about  innovative technologies,
  consulting with one another  online,  and accessing  data-
  bases.  CLU-IN is used by those involved in the cleanup of
  Superfund and  Resource Conservation  and Recovery  Act
  corrective action sites,  including EPA, other Federal Agency
  and  State personnel, consulting engineers, technology ven-
  dors,  remediation  contractors,  researchers,  community
  groups, and individual citizens.
  Specifications: 36p.
  Subject  index  keywords: Hazardous materials,  Cleanup,
  Data acquisition, Telecommunications, Superfund.
1216   Comparison of a Revised Area Source Algorithm for
  the Industrial Source Complex Short Term Model  and
  Wind Tunnel Data
  Order Number PB93-226751CDH, price: PC A08/MF A02
  Pacific  Environmental Services, Inc., Research Triangle Park,
  NC.; Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle
  Park, NC. Technical Support Div; Oct 92
  The report summarizes the results of comparison between a
  new numerical integration algorithm for modeling area source
  dispersion, as implemented in the  Industrial Source Complex
  Short Term (ISCST2) model using wind tunnel data collected
  in the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's Fluid Modeling
  Facility.  Area sources referred to can be characterized  as
  low level releases with  little buoyance due to either  momen-
  tum or temperature such as landfills or lagoons that are com-
  monly found  at superfund  sites. The results of the analyses
  show that the new ISCST2 area  source  algorithm  predicts
  the  concentration distribution  with relatively good accuracy,
  especially for  ground-level area  sources. The  conclusion
  seems  also valid for the various source shapes and orienta-
  tions thus suggesting the  ability of the model to  accurately
  depict the plume shape for complex  source-receptor geome-
  tries.
  Specifications:  See also PB93-226777 and PB92-232446.
  Sponsored by Environmental  Protection Agency, Research
  Triangle Park, NC. Technical Support Div. 175p.
  Subject  index  keywords: Air pollution  dispersion,  Algo-
  rithms, Mathematical models.
1217   Comparison: Organic Emissions from Hazardous
  Waste Incinerators versus the 1990 Toxics Release
  Inventory Air Releases
  Order Number PB92-206267CDH, price: PC A03/MF  A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk
  Reduction Engineering Lab; cFeb 92
  Incineration is often the preferred technology for disposing of
  hazardous waste and remediating Superfund sites.  The ef-
  fective implementation of the technology is frequently imped-
  ed by strong public  opposition to hazardous waste inciner-
  ation (HWI). One of  the reasons cited for the opposition is
  the perception that the emission of organics pose an unrea-
  sonable threat to human health. While numerous risk assess-
  ments for these facilities has demonstrated these risks are
  very low, this has not totally allayed some of the concerns. In
  order to put organic emissions in perspective, the mass of
  these  emissions from the incineration of hazardous waste
  has been estimated  using 'reasonable worst-case' assump-
  tions and compared  to the 1990  Toxics  Release  Inventory
  (TRI) air releases. Comparisons were made for 15 carcino-
  genic organic  compounds and 17 non-carcinogenic organic
  compounds. Ratios for all but one of these compound-specif-
  ic  HWI emissions to their corresponding TRI air releases
  ranged from 0.0003% to 0.746%.  The total mass emissions
  (121.7 tons) of all  32 specific organics from HWIs was less
  than  0.03%  of  the  corresponding 1990 TRI air releases
  (431,600 tons).
  Specifications:  Pub. in Jnl. of the Air and Waste Manage-
  ment Association,  V92-42.01  p1-15. See  also PB85-129492,
  PB87-228508, PB92-155381 and PB92-501816. Presented at
  the Annual Meeting and Exhibition (85th), Kansas City, MO.,
  June 21-26, 1992.  17p.
  Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Air pollution
  sampling, Incineration, Organic compounds, Waste disposal.

1218  Computer Models Used to Support Cleanup
  Decision-Making at Hazardous and Radioactive Waste
  Sites
  Order Number PB93-183333CDH, price: PC A06/MF A02
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Radiation and Indoor  Air.; Department of Energy,
  Washington, DC. Nuclear Regulatory Commission,
  Washington, DC. Office of Nuclear  Material Safety and
  Safeguards; Mar 93
  To identify computer models actually being used to support
  decision-making  at hazardous and radioactive waste  sites,
  EPA, DOE, and NRC  jointly funded a study. The purpose was
  to  identify models  being used for hazardous and  radioactive
  waste   site  assessment and  describe  and classify these
  models. Approximately  550 surveys were mailed  to people
  engaged in cleanups at  hazardous and  radioactive waste
  sites. Responses were received from 87. The respondents
  identified  127 computer  models  used  at EPA  Superfund,
  DOE and  NRC  sites. The  models included  multi-media
  models, ground  water  models,  air  models,  engineering
  models, surface water models, geochemical models, and util-
  ity  models. The responses revealed that few models were
  used across a large number of sites. In contrast, the results
  suggested that most cleanup efforts employed  site-specific
  models.
  Specifications:  Prepared  in cooperation  with Department of
  Energy, Washington,  DC.,  and Nuclear Regulatory Commis-
  sion, Washington, DC. Office of Nuclear Material  Safety and
  Safeguards. 113p.
  Subjecf: index keywords: Hazardous materials, Radioactive
  wastes, Computer programs.
                                                                                                              229

-------
TECHNOLOGY POLICY & ADMINISTRATION:
Miscellaneous Policy & Program Documents
1219  Contingency Analysis Modeling for Superfund Sites
  and Other Sources
  Order Number PB93-169126CDH, price: PC A13/MF A03
  Science Applications International Corp., Reston, VA.;
  Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park,
  NC. Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards; Jan 93
  The report provides information on contingency modeling for
  a wide range of different accidental release scenarios of haz-
  ardous air pollutants that might take place at Superfund and
  other sites. The scenarios are used to illustrate how atmos-
  pheric  dispersion  models,  including dense  gas  models,
  should be applied.  Particular emphasis is  made on the input
  data that is needed for proper applications of models. Flow
  charts direct the user to specific sections where various sce-
  narios are discussed. A check list of items  that should be
  discussed before running the model is provided. Several ex-
  amples are provided  to specifically show how to apply the
  models so as to produce a credible analysis for a particular
  release scenario.
  Specifications:  See also  PB86-245248, PB89-134340 and
  PB91-141820.  Sponsored  by Environmental  Protection
  Agency, Research  Triangle Park, NC. Office of Air Quality
  Planning and Standards. 291 p.
  Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Air pollution
  control, Contingency planning, Waste management,  Comput-
  erized simulation.

1220  Control Technologies for Defunct lead Battery
  Recycling Sites: Overview and Recent Developments.
  Volume 3
  Order Dumber PB92-1504.16CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
  Foster Wheeler Enviresponse,  inc., Edison, NJ.;
  Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk
  Reduction Engineering Lab; 1992
  At least 29 lead battery recycling sites  are or  have  been
  slated for Investigation  and possible remediation under the
  Superfund program. The paper condenses  information re-
  garding the characteristics and remediation  of these  sites.
  The information provided includes:  (1) description  of  oper-
  ations commonly conducted, and wastes generated; (2) tech-
  nologies implemented or selected for site  remediation; (3)
  case studies  of treatability studies on common wastes; (4)
  past experience regarding the  recyclability of  materials found
  at the sites, and (5) profiles of potentially applicable innova-
  tive treatment technologies.
  Specifications:  Presented in International Seminar on Bat-
  tery Waste Management (3rd), Deerfield, FL, November 4-6,
  1991,  v3 p1-22. See also PB92-114537. Sponsored by Envi-
  ronmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk Reduction
  Engineering Lab. 25p.
  Subject Index  keywords: Waste  management, Lead acid
  batteries, Waste treatment, Superfund, Remedial action.
1221  Control Technologies for Remediation of
  Contaminated Soil and Waste Deposits at Superfund
  Lead Battery Recycling Sites
  Order Number PB92-227388CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
  Foster Wheeler Enviresponse,  Inc., Edison, NJ.;
  Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk
  Reduction Engineering Lab; c1992
  The paper primarily addresses remediation of contaminated
  soils and waste deposits at defunct lead-acid  battery recy-
  cling sites (LBRS) via immobilization and separation  process-
  es. Metallic lead and lead compounds are generally the prin-
  cipal contaminants of concern in  soils and waste deposits.
  Other metals (e.g., cadmium, copper, arsenic, antimony, and
  selenium) are often present at LBRS. The article is primarily
  based on experience gained from: (1) Superfund site investi-
  gation,  removal, and remedial actions, and (2) development
  and demonstration of control technologies  under the Super-
  fund Innovative Technology Evaluation (SITE) Program. The
  primary remedial options  for lead contaminated soils and
  waste deposits include: (1) no action, (2) off-site disposal, (3)
  containment, (4) immobilization, (5) separation with resource
  recovery,  and (6) separation without resource recovery.
  Specifications:  Pub. in Jnl. of the Air and Waste Manage-
  ment Association,  v42 n7 p970-980 Jul 92. Sponsored by
  Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH.  Risk Re-
  duction Engineering Lab. 14p.
  Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Electric bat-
  teries, Soils, Pollution control, Superfund.

1222  Control Technology: Estimating Innovative
  Technology Costs for the SITE Program
  Order Number PB91-163758CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk
  Reduction Engineering Lab; c1990
  The paper provides the reader with  an overview of the cost
  estimation approach employed by the Superfund Innovative
  Technology Evaluation (SITE) Program. The paper identifies
  4 areas of concern which confront  the cost analyst as the
  question of technology cost is considered. These  concerns
  are then addressed through a 5 part cost methodology sub-
  sequently employed on all SITE technology demonstrations.
  The final  section of the paper review the cost data gathered
  from the first nine technology demonstrations completed and
  reported on.
  Specifications:  Pub. in Jnl. of the Air and Waste Manage-
  ment Association, v40 n7 Jul 90. 7p.
  Subject index keywords: Superfund, Cost estimates, Waste
  treatment, Waste disposal, Hazardous materials, Superfund
  Innovative Technology Evaluation Program.

1223  Control Technology: 1992 Update of U.S. EPA's
  Superfund Innovative Technology Evaluation (SITE)
  Emerging Technology Program
  Order Number PB93-150159CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC.  Office of
  Emergency and Remedial Response; c1992
  The  Superfund Innovative Technology Evaluation  (SITE)
  Emerging Technology Program (ETP) has encouraged and fi-
  nancially supported further development of bench-  and pilot-
  scale testing and evaluation of innovative technologies suita-
  ble for use at hazardous waste sites for five years. The ETP
  was established under the Superfund Amendments and Re-
  authorization Act (SARA)  of 1986. The  ETP complies with
  the goal  of the SITE Program to  promote, accelerate and
  make commercially available the development of alternative/
  innovative treatment technologies for use at Superfund sites.
  Technologies are submitted to the ETP through yearly solici-
  tations  for Preprosals.  Facilities, equipment, data collection,
  performance and development are monitored throughout the
  project. The  U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) and the U.S.
  Air Force (USAF) are participants in the ETP. DOE has co-
  funded ETP projects since 1990 and the USAF since 1991. A
  primary goal of the ETP is to move developed  technologies
  to the field-demonstration stage. Therefore, a developer may
230

-------
                                                                    TECHNOLOGY POLICY & ADMINISTRATION:
                                                                    Miscellaneous Policy & Program Documents
  be considered for  participation in the SITE Demonstration
  Program  provided  performance in  the ETP indicates the
  technology is field-ready for demonstration and evaluation.
  Specifications: Pub. in Jnl. of the  Air and Waste Manage-
  ment Association, v42 n12  p1644-1656 Dec 92.  See also
  PB92-224294. 14p.
  Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Technology
  innovation, Waste management, Superfund Innovative Tech-
  nology  Evaluation  Program,  Innovative treatment  technol-
  ogies.

1224  Criteria for Choosing Indicator Species for
  Ecological Risk Assessments at Superfund Sites (90-
  6402)
  Order Number PB91-204321CDH,  price: PC A04/MF A01
  North Carolina Univ. at Chapel  Hill. Dept. of Environmental
  Sciences and Engineering.; Environmental Protection
  Agency, Washington, DC. Office of Cooperative
  Environmental Management; Dec 90
  The purpose of the paper is to develop criteria for choosing
  indicator  species for ecological risk assessments at Super-
  fund sites. The paper begins with  an introduction of the indi-
  cator species concept and a brief review of the indicator spe-
  cies  in  terrestrial  and  aquatic environments.  Criteria for
  choosing  species are then outlined and explained.
  Specifications:  Sponsored  by  Environmental Protection
  Agency, Washington, DC. Office of Cooperative Environmen-
  tal Management. 57p.
  Subject  index keywords: Risk  assessment, Superfund,
  Land pollution,  Indicator species, Waste disposal, Water pol-
  lution effects.

1225  CWM PO*WW*ER (Trade Name) Evaporation-
  Catalytic Oxidation Technology: Applications Analysis
  Report
  Order Number PB94-124658CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk
  Reduction Engineering Lab;  Sep 93
  This report evaluates the Chemical Waste Management, Inc.
  (CWM), PO*WW*ER(TM) technology's ability to remove vola-
  tile organic compounds  (VOC), semivolatile organic com-
  pounds (SVOC), ammonia,  cyanide, metals, and other inor-
  ganic contaminants from aqueous wastes. This evaluation is
  based on treatment  performance and cost data obtained
  from the Superfund Innovative  Technology Evaluation (SITE)
  demonstration and 11 case  studies conducted by CWM. The
  PO*WW*ER(TM) system reduces the volume of an aqueous
  waste and catalytically oxidizes volatile contaminants. The
  PO*WW*ER(TM)  system  consists primarily of (1) an evapo-
  rator that reduces influent wastewater volume, (2) a catalytic
  oxidizer that oxidizes  the volatile contaminants in the vapor
  stream from the evaporator, (3) a scrubber that removes acid
  gases formed during oxidation,  and (4) a condenser that con-
  denses the  vapor stream leaving the scrubber. This  report
  also  discusses  the applicability  of  the  PO*WW*ER(TM)
  system  based on compliance  with regulatory requirements,
  implementability, short-term impact, and long-term  effective-
  ness. In addition, factors influencing the  technology's per-
  formance in meeting these criteria and evaluation limitations
  are discussed.
  Specifications: 75p.
  Subject index keywords: Liquid wastes,  Waste treatment,
  Hazardous  materials,  Superfund,  Water  pollution control,
  PO*WW*ER system, Innovative treatment technologies.

1226  Demonstration of a Trial Excavation at the McColl
  Superfund Site
  Order Number PB93-100121CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
  IT Corp., Cincinnati, OH.; Environmental Protection Agency,
  Cincinnati, OH. Risk Reduction Engineering Lab; Oct 92
  The project describes  the trial excavation  performed  at the
  McColl Hazardous Waste Site. Excavation  at this site pre-
  sents  unique problems due to the  high potential for release
  of sulfur dioxide and volatile odorous compounds contained
  in the  waste. The excavation demonstration was  used to
  obtain information on the utilization of an enclosure and as-
  sociated air treatment systems around the excavation to min-
  imize air emissions and the use of  foam vapor suppressants
  to reduce emissions from the waste during excavation. In ad-
  dition, information was obtained  on processing the tar frac-
  tion of this waste by mixing it with cement and fly ash. The
  demonstration is documented in two reports: (1) a Technolo-
  gy Evaluation Report describing the field activities and labo-
  ratory  results;  and  (2) this  Applications  Analysis Report,
  which interprets the data and discusses the potential applica-
  bility of the technology.
  Specifications:  See also PB92-226448. Sponsored by Envi-
  ronmental Protection Agency,  Cincinnati, OH. Risk Reduction
  Engineering Lab. 61 p.
  Subject index keywords: Superfund, Hazardous materials,
  Air  pollution control,  Remedial action,  Waste  treatment,
  Fullerton(California).

1227  Demonstration of Hazardous Waste Site Treatment
  Technologies
  Order Number PB91-176909CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk
  Reduction Engineering  Lab; 1989
  The SITE Program is intended to accelerate the use of new
  and innovative  treatment processes that provide permanent
  control of hazardous waste as well as evaluate innovative
  measurement and  monitoring techniques  and  pursue  an
  active technology transfer program. Within the SITE Pro-
  gram,  the Demonstration Program  and the Emerging  Tech-
  nology Program are responsible for alternative technology
  development. The SITE Demonstration Program has  as its
  major  thrust the documentation of  reliable  performance and
  cost information for innovative alternative technologies. The
  demonstration projects identify limitations of the technology,
  the  need for pre- or  post-treatment of wastes,  applicable
  wastes and waste media,  potential operating problems, and
  the approximate cost of applying the technology.
  Specifications:  Pub. in Berlin Recycling Congress Proceed-
  ings, Berlin, Germany, November 1989, p1-8. 10p.
  Subject index keywords: Demonstration programs, Hazard-
  ous materials, Waste treatment, Superfund Innovative Tech-
  nology Evaluation.
                                                                                                               231

-------
TECHNOLOGY POJJCY & ADMINISTRATION:
Miscellaneous Policy & Program Documents
1228  Demonstration of Microfiltration Technology
  Order Number PB92-136936CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk
  Reduction Engineering Lab.; PRC Environmental
  Management, Inc., Chicago, IL; c1991
  The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, under the Super-
  fund Innovative Technology Evaluation (SITE) program in co-
  operation with E.I.  DuPont de Nemours and Company, Inc.
  (DuPont) and the Oberlin Filter Company (Oberlin), undertook
  a field demonstration project to evaluate microfiltration tech-
  nology for removal  of zinc  and  suspended solids from
  wastewater.  The microfiltration system utilized  DuPont's
  Tyvek T-980 membrane filter media in conjunction with the
  Ofaerlin automatic pressure filter. The project was undertaken
  at the Palmerton Zinc Superfund site in April, 1990. Analysis
  of the treated filtrate indicated that the system removed pre-
  cipitated  zinc and  other suspended solids  at an  efficiency
  greater  than 99.9 percent.  (Copyright  (c) 1991-Air and
  Waste Management Association.)
  Specifications:  Pub. in Jnl. of Air and Waste Management,
  v12 p1653-1657 Dec 91. See also PB92-119023. Prepared in
  cooperation with PRC Environmental Management, Inc., Chi-
  cago,  IL. 7p.
  Subject index  keywords: Water pollution control, Super-
  fund, Waste treatment,  Liquid wastes, Land pollution control,
  Microfiltration,   DuPont/Oberlin  Microfiltration   Treatment
  System.

1229  Demonstration of Waste Treatment Technologies
  Order Number PB92.-179670CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk
  Reduction Engineering Lab; 1991
  The need for long-term, permanent treatment schemes as al-
  ternatives to land disposal has been highlighted by legislation
  such as the  Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments of the
  Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) and the
  Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization Act (SARA)  of
  1986, SARA directed  the U.S. Environmental  Protection
  Agency  to establish an 'Alternative or Innovative Treatment
  Technology Research and  Demonstration Program' to identi-
  fy promising waste treatment technologies, assist with their
  evaluation, and  promote their use  at Superfund  sites. In  re-
  sponse to this directive the Superfund Innovative Technology
  Evaluation (SITE) Program was formed. Twenty technology
  demonstrations have been  completed in the SITE Program to
  date. Those completed within the past year include  microfil-
  tration (DuPont and the Oberlin Filter Company), waste exca-
  vation and  emissions  control  (EPA Region  9), integrated
  vapor1 extraction and steam vacuum stripping (AWD Technol-
  ogies), solidification of contaminated soil  (Silicate Technology
  Corporation), and flame reactor recovery of lead (Horsehead
  Resource Development Company).
  Specifications:  Presented at the Engineering and Technolo-
  gy Conference  (1st) on Waste Management Technology,
  Technology Transfer  and Training, San Juan, PR., April 24-
  26,  1991. See also PB90-216516. 7p.
  Subject index keywords: Waste treatment, Hazardous ma-
  terials, Remedial action, Superfund Innovative  Technology
  Evaluation Program.
1230  Demonstration Projects Under the U.S. EPA
  Superfund Innovative Technology Evaluation Program
  Order Number PB91-176891CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk
  Reduction Engineering  Lab; 1991
  The U.S.  Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is engaged
  in an  initiative  called the  Superfund Innovative Technology
  Evaluation (SITE) program. This program offers a mechanism
  for  conducting  joint technology  demonstration/evaluation
  projects between the private sector and EPA. The purpose of
  the  program is to provide an  opportunity for developers to
  demonstrate the performance of their technologies on actual
  hazardous waste materials, and provide reliable  and accurate
  information  for future cleanup activities at Superfund sites.
  Currently  there are 38 active projects  in the Demonstration
  Program.  Eight of these projects involve solidification/stabili-
  zation, nine concentrate on thermal processes, five are bio-
  logical processes, and the remaining  16 include  separation
  techniques,  chemical treatment, and in-place vitrification. The
  paper briefly describes the active program and highlights
  those demonstrations which have been completed.
  Specifications: Pub. in the Annual Army Environmental Re-
  search and  Development  Symposium (14th)  Proceedings,
  November 14-16, 1989, p25-32. 10p.
  Subject index  keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste treat-
  ment, Demonstration programs, Superfund Innovative Tech-
  nology Evaluation Program.
1231  Development of Emerging Technologies within the
  SITE Program
  Order Number PB92-217322CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk
  Reduction Engineering Lab; 1992
  The SITE Program is formed by five research programs: The
  Demonstration  Program, The Emerging Technology Program,
  the  Measurement and Monitoring Technology  Development
  Program,  the Innovative Technology Program, and the Tech-
  nology Transfer  Program.  The Emerging  Technology   (ET)
  Program  has been in existence for five years and has devel-
  oped several innovative technologies that have  shown prom-
  ise in being  applicable to  clean-up activities related to  haz-
  ardous waste problems. Technologies  are eligible for the ET
  Program  when sufficient research  data exists validating the
  technologies' basic concepts. The  EPA contributes  funds to
  support developers for one or two  years. Developers are re-
  sponsible for conducting research and  providing additional fi-
  nancial support in the cooperative research effort. Generally,
  technologies are categorized into six areas: Thermal, chemi-
  cal, biological, materials handling, physical, and  solidification/
  stabilization.
  Specifications:  See also PB90-249756 and PB92-150663.
  Presented at the Annual Conference on Contaminated Land:
  Policy, Regulation, and Technology (3rd), London,  England,
  February  6-7, 1992. 26p.
  Subject  index keywords:  Hazardous materials, Site  sur-
  veys, Superfund.
232

-------
                                                                    TECHNOLOGY POLICY & ADMINISTRATION:
                                                                    Miscellaneous Policy & Program Documents
1232  Emerging Technology Report: Metals Treatment at
  Superfund Sites by Absorptive Filtration
  Order Number PB93-231165CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
  Washington Univ., Seattle.; Environmental Protection Agency,
  Cincinnati, OH. Risk Reduction Engineering Lab; Jun 93
  The project evaluated an innovative approach for removing
  inorganic contaminants from the liquid phase at Superfund
  Sites.  In the adsorptive filtration process metals are collected
  by attachment to a thin layer of ferrihydrite (Iron Oxide) that
  has been immobilized on the surface of sand grains. The
  modification of the sand surface allows the grains to simulta-
  neously adsorb soluable heavy  metals and remove  particu-
  late metals by filtration from a wastewater. The metals stud-
  ied were Cd, Cu, and Pb present at 0.5 or 5  mg/L each, in
  synthetic solutions.
  Specifications:  Sponsored  by Environmental Protection
  Agency,  Cincinnati,  OH.  Risk  Reduction Engineering  Lab.
  52p.
  Subject index  keywords: Superfund, Metals, Water  pollu-
  tion control.

1233  Engineering Bulletin: Landfill Covers
  Order Number PB94-105426CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk
  Reduction Engineering Lab; Feb  93
  Landfill covers are  used at Superfund sites to minimize sur-
  face water infiltration and to prevent exposure to the waste.
  In many cases,  covers are used in conjunction with  other
  waste treatment technologies, such as slurry walls,  ground-
  water pump- and treat-systems, and  in situ treatment. The
  bulletin discusses various aspects of landfill covers, their ap-
  plicability, and limitations on their use  and describes innova-
  tive techniques, site requirements, performance data, current
  status, and sources of further information regarding the tech-
  nology.
  Specifications:   See  also  PB87-119483,  PB87-191656,
  PB89-233480 and PB90-179664. 9p.
  Subject  index  keywords:  Landfills,  Coverings, Waste dis-
  posal.

1234  Engineering Bulletin: Pyrolysis Treatment
  Order Number PB93-105583CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Emergency and Remedial Response; Oct 92
  The  Engineering Bulletins are a series  of documents that
  summarize the latest information available on selected treat-
  ment  and site remediation technologies  and  related issues.
  Pyrolysis is formally defined as chemical decomposition in-
  duced in organic materials by heat in the  absence of oxygen.
  Pyrolysis is a thermal process that transforms hazardous or-
  ganic materials  into gaseous components and a solid residue
  (coke) containing fixed carbon  and ash. Upon cooling, the
  gaseous components condense, leaving an  oil/tar  residue.
  Pyrolysis is applicable to a wide range of organic wastes and
  is generally not used in treating wastes consisting primarily of
  inorganics and  metals. The bulletin provides  information on
  the technology applicability, the types of residuals resulting
  from the use of the technology,  the latest performance data,
  site requirements, the status of the technology, and where to
  go for further information.
  Specifications:  8p.
  Subject  index  keywords:  Superfund,  Remedial  action,
  Waste treatment, Pyrolysis, Hazardous materials, Soil treat-
  ment.

1235  Engineering Bulletin: Slurry Walls
  Order Number PB93-105575CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Emergency and Remedial Response; Oct 92
  Slurry walls are used at Superfund sites to contain the waste
  or contamination  and to reduce the potential of future migra-
  tion of waste constituents. In many cases slurry walls  are
  used in conjunction with other waste treatment technologies,
  such as covers and ground water pump-and-treat systems.
  This bulletin discusses various aspects of slurry walls includ-
  ing their applicability, limitations on their use, a description of
  the technology including innovative techniques, and materials
  of construction including new alternative barrier materials,
  site requirements,  performance data,  the  status of these
  methods, and sources of further information.
  Specifications: 10p.
  Subject: index keywords: Superfund, Containment, Waste
  treatment, Hazardous materials, Slurry walls.

1236  Engineering Bulletins: Aids to the Development of
  Remedial Alternatives
  Order Number  PB94-101797CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
  Science Applications International Corp., Cincinnati, OH.;
  Environmental  Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH.  Risk
  Reduction Engineering Lab; c1991
  The paper provides the background for an introduction to the
  new series of EPA documents called 'Engineering Bulletins.'
  Engineering Bulletins summarize the latest information avail-
  able on selected waste treatment and contaminated site re-
  mediation technologies and related issues. A description of
  the document series is given  and a  summary of the informa-
  tion contained in  the first ten bulletins is provided.
  Specifications:  Pub. in Jnl.  of the Air and Waste Manage-
  ment Association, v41  n10 p1393-1396 Oct 91.  Sponsored
  by Environmental Protection  Agency,  Cincinnati, OH.  Risk
  Reduction Engineering Lab. 6p.
  Subject index keywords: Documents, Technology assess-
  ment, Remedial action, Superfund.

1237   Environmental Characteristics of EPA, NRC, and
  DOE Sites Contaminated with Radioactive Substances
  Order Number  PB93-185551CDH, price: PC A05/MF A01
  Environmental  Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Radiation and Indoor Air. Department of Energy, Washington,
  DC. Office of Environmental Restoration. Nuclear  Regulatory
  Commission, Washington, DC. Office of Nuclear Material
  Safety and Safeguards; Mar 93
  The U.S. EPA  offices of Radiation and Indoor Air and Solid
  Waste and Emergency Response, the  US  Department of
  Energy Office of Environmental Restoration and Waste Man-
  agement,  and  the Nuclear Regulatory Commission Office of
  Nuclear Material Safety and  Safeguards  initiated preliminary
  efforts to  promote  the more  appropriate  and consistent  use
  of computer models in remediating sites contaminated by ra-
  dioactive substances and managed by the participating fed-
  eral agencies. As a baseline for these efforts, the nature  and
  types of problems present at these sites must be under-
  stood. The report responds to this need.  It presents in textu-
  al, tabular, and graphical formats: a list  of the 45 EPA  Na-
                                                                                                                233

-------
TECHNOLOGY POLICY & ADMINISTRATION:
Miscellaneous Policy & Program Documents
  tionai Priorities List Superfund sites and the 38 NRC Site De-
  commissioning Management Plan sites containing radioactive
  waste, materials, the types of waste found at each site, a de-
  scription of the physical form of the waste, physical charac-
  teristics of the site, and demographic characteristics of the
  region surrounding the site.
  Specifications:  See also DE90013615. Prepared in coop-
  eration with  Department of Energy, Washington, DC. Office
  of Environmental Restoration, and Nuclear Regulatory Com-
  mission, Washington, DC. Office of Nuclear Material Safety
  and Safeguards. 93p.
  Subject index keywords: Superfund, Radioactive wastes,
  Radioactive contamination, Waste management.

1238  Environmental Monitoring Methods Index (EMMI),
  Version 1.0 (5 - User LAN) (for Microcomputers)
  Order Number PB92-504257CDH, price: Diskette $995.00
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Science and Technology; Dec 91
  EPA's  Environmental  Monitoring  Methods  Index  System
  (EMMJ)  is an easy to use PC information data base on all
  EPA-regulated substances, methods for their analysis, and
  regulatory and office-based lists on which they appear. EMMI
  combines  rapid look-up  with a user-friendly  interface and
  easily accessible data. The EMMI System aids in the selec-
  tion of the appropriate analytical methods for  environmental
  monitoring studies.  The EMMI database includes information
  on more than 2600 substances from over 50 regulatory and
  non-regulatory lists and more than 900 analytical methods.
  EMMI includes substances from the Clean Water Act (CWA),
  Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and
  Liability  Act  (CERCLA),  Superfund  Amendments and Reau-
  thorizaUon Act (SARA),  Resource Conservation  and Recov-
  ery Act (RCRA), Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA), and Clean
  Air Act (CAA), as well as substances from other Agency and
  State lists. The database provides a comprehensive cross-
  reference  between substances  and analytical methods and
  contains information on related laws and organizations and
  additional databases for further information.
  Specifications: The software  and database are contained
  on three 5 1/2 inch, 1.2M high density and three 3 1/2 inch,
  1.44M high density diskettes. File format: Compressed. Doc-
  umentation included; may be ordered separately as PB92-
  169648. For single user,  order PB92-503093,  for unlimited
  user LAN, order PB92-504265. System: IBM PC or compati-
  ble; MS DOS operating system, 512K. Language: System 'J'
  Software.  System 'J' Software  is included in the package.
  Decompression  software  included. See also  PB92-592290
  (RCRIS),  PB91-591310   (CERCLIS),  and   PB92-501774
  (SARA). 6 diskettes.
  Subject index keywords: Software, Environmental monitor-
  ing, lridexes(Documentati6n).

1239  Environmental Monitoring Methods Index (EMMI),
  Version 1.6 (for Microcomputers)
  Order Number PB92-503093CDH, price: Diskette $385.00
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Science and Technology; Dec 91
  EPA's  Environmental  Monitoring  Methods  Index  System
  (EMMI) is  an easy to use PC  information data  base on  all
  EPA-regulated substances, methods  for their analysis, and
  regulatory and office-based lists on which they appear. EMMI
  combines  rapid look-up  with a user-friendly  interface and
  easily accessible data. The EMMI System aids in the selec-
  tion of the appropriate analytical  methods for environmental
  monitoring studies. The EMMI database includes information
  on more than 2600 substances from over 50 regulatory and
  non-regulatory lists and more than 900 analytical methods.
  EMMI includes substances from the Clean Water Act (CWA),
  Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and
  Liability Act (CERCLA), Superfund Amendments and Reau-
  thorization Act (SARA), Resource Conservation and Recov-
  ery Act (RCRA), Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA), and Clean
  Air Act (CAA), as well as substances from other Agency and
  State lists.
  Specifications: The software and database are contained
  on three 51/4 inch, 1.2M high density and three 31/2 inch,
  1.44M high density diskettes. File format: Compressed. Doc-
  umentation included; may be ordered separately as PB92-
  169648.  For 2-5 user LAN, order  PB92-504257, for unlimited
  user LAN, order PB92-504265. System:  IBM PC or compati-
  ble;  MS DOS operating system, 512K. Language: System 'J'
  Software. System  'J'  Software is included in the package.
  Decompression software  included. See  also PB92-592290
  (RCRIS),   PB91-591310   (CERCLIS),   and  PB92-501774
  (SARA). 6 diskettes.
  Subject  index keywords: Software, Environmental monitor-
  ing, Indexes(Documentation).

1240  Environmental Monitoring Methods Index (EMMI),
  Version  1.0 (Unlimited User LAN) (for Microcomputers)
  Order Number PB92-504265CDH,  price: Diskette $1995.00
  Environmental Protection Agency,  Washington, DC. Office of
  Science and Technology; Dec 91
  EPA's Environmental  Monitoring Methods  Index  System
  (EMMI) is an easy to use PC information data base on all
  EPA-regulated substances,  methods for their analysis,  and
  regulatory and office-based lists on which they appear. EMMI
  combines  rapid look-up with a  user-friendly interface  and
  easily  accessible data. The EMMI System aids in the selec-
  tion  of the appropriate analytical  methods for environmental
  monitoring studies. The EMMI database includes information
  on more than 2600 substances from over 50 regulatory and
  non-regulatory lists and more than 900 analytical  methods.
  EMMI  includes substances from the Clean Water Act (CWA),
  Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and
  Liability Act (CERCLA), Superfund Amendments and Reau-
  thorization Act (SARA), Resource Conservation and Recov-
  ery Act (RCRA), Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA), and Clean
  Air Act (CAA), as well as substances from other Agency and
  State  lists. The database provides a  comprehensive cross-
  reference between  substances and analytical methods  and
  contains information on related laws and  organizations  and
  additional databases for further information.
  Specifications: The software and  database are contained
  on three 51/4 inch, 1.2M high density and three 31/2 inch
  1.44M high density and diskettes. File format: Compressed.
  Documentation included;  may be ordered  separately  as
  PB92-169648. For  single  user, order number PB92-503093,
  for 2-5 user  LAN,  order PB92-504257.  System: IBM PC or
  compatible; MS  DOS operating  system,  512K. Language:
  System 'J' Software. System 'J' Software is included in the
  package.  Decompression software included. See also PB92-
  592290  (RCRIS),   PB91-591310   (CERCLIS),  and   PB92-
  501774 (SARA). 6 diskettes.
  Subject index keywords: Software, Environmental  monitor-
  ing.
234

-------
                                                                    TECHNOLOGY POLICY & ADMINISTRATION:
                                                                    Miscellaneous Policy & Program Documents
1241  EPA/Navy CERCLA Remedial Action Technology
  Guide
  Order Number PB94-138948CDH, price: PC A13/MF A03
  Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH.; Naval
  Facilities Engineering Service Center, Port Hueneme, CA;
  Nov93
  The guide is a collection of (1) Engineering  Bulletins pro-
  duced by the EPA's Technical Support Branch in Cincinnati,
  OH and (2) Remedial Action Tech Data Sheets produced by
  the  Naval  Energy and  Environmental Support Activity
  (NEESA)  in Port  Hueneme, CA. These documents compre-
  hensively summarize  the  latest  information obtainable  on
  many of the best available remedial technologies. The intent
  is to convey information (based on previous applications) to
  help  remedial  project  managers,  engineers in charge, on-
  scene coordinators, Navy resident officers in charge of con-
  struction,  and contractors decide if a  technology should  be
  used at a hazardous waste site and if  so, what are the rele-
  vant  design, implementation, and  cost considerations. Ad-
  denda will be issued periodically to update the original bulle-
  tins  and tech data sheets, and other  technologies may  be
  added.
  Specifications:  Prepared in cooperation with  Naval  Facili-
  ties Engineering Service Center, Port Hueneme, CA. 288p.
  Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials,  Remedial
  action,  Superfund.

1242  EPA SITE Demonstration of the  Horsehead
  Resource Development Company Flame Reactor
  Technology
  Order Number PB92-139401CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
  Versar, Inc., Springfield, VA.; PRC Environmental
  Management, Inc., Houston, TX.*Environmental Protection
  Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk Reduction Engineering Lab;
  1992
  The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's Superfund Inno-
  vative Technology  Evaluation  (SITE) program selected the
  Horsehead  Resource  Development Company, Inc.  (HRD)
  Flame  Reactor technology  for evaluation by demonstration
  which took place in March  1991. A series of test  runs was
  conducted  at  the  HRD facility  in Monaca,  Pennsylvania,
  using 72 tons of secondary lead smelter slag (SLSS) from a
  Superfund site  in  Atlanta, Georgia. The SLSS contained zinc,
  iron, cadmium, and many other metals and inorganic com-
  pounds. The HRD Flame Reactor  technology  is a patented
  high-temperature  thermal process  designed to safely treat
  wastes containing metals. During processing, the waste is in-
  troduced to the hottest portion of  the  HRD Flame Reactor,
  where it is  subjected to greater than 2000 C  reducing gas.
  The waste material  reacts rapidly, producing  a nonhazardous
  vitrified effluent slag and gases,  including steam and metal
  vapors. The metal vapors react in  the combustion chamber
  to produce the metal-enriched oxides that are  collected in a
  baghouse. The SITE program evaluated the  HRD Flame Re-
  actor for its effectiveness in treating a  Superfund site waste,
  which is hazardous (by Toxicity Characteristic)  for  cadmium
  and lead, to form  a recyclable metal oxide and a vitrified slag
  that is nonleachable.
  Specifications:  Presented  at  HMCRI's  Annual   National
  Conference and Exhibition (12th), Washington, DC., Decem-
  ber 3-5, 1991,  p675-678. Prepared in cooperation  with PRC
  Environmental  Management,  Inc.,  Houston, TX. Sponsored
  by Environmental  Protection  Agency, Cincinnati, OH.  Risk
  Reduction Engineering Lab. 7p.
  Subject index keywords: Thermal reactors, Thermal recov-
  ery methods, Pollution control equipment, Slags, Waste treat-
  ment,  Performance evaluation,  Superfund  Innovative Tech-
  nology Evaluation Program.

1243  EPA Site Demonstration of the Terra Vac In situ
  Vacuum Extraction Process in Groveland,
  Massachusetts. (Site Program  Update: Part VII)
  Order  Number PB91-182097CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk
  Reduction Engineering Lab; c1989
  The paper presents an EPA evaluation of the patented Terra
  Vac, Inc.'s in situ vacuum extraction process that was field-
  demonstrated on a trichloroethylene (TCE) contaminated soil
  in  Groveland, MA, under the  EPA Superfund  Innovative
  Technology Evaluation (SITE) program. The Terra Vac proc-
  ess employs vacuum for removal and venting of volatile or-
  ganic compounds (VOCs), such  as TCE, from the subsurface
  soil without excavation. The demonstration site was a proper-
  ty of an operating  machine shop in Groveland, MA. The site
  was contaminated with VOCs, mainly TCE, which had been
  used as a degreasing solvent.  The Terra  Vac system was
  designed, installed, and operated by Terra  Vac,  Inc. Evalua-
  tion of the  process was performed  by EPA based on the re-
  sults from an extensive sampling and analytical program and
  on daily observation of the operations.
  Specifications:  Pub. in Jnl. of  the Air Pollution Control As-
  sociation, v39 n8 p1054-1062 Aug 89. 10p.
  Subject index keywords: Remedial action, Land  pollution
  control,  Volatile  organic compounds,  Superfund Innovative
  Technology Evaluation  Program, Terra Vac System, Soil
  vacuum extraction.

1244  Estimation of the Cost of  Using Chemical Protective
  Clothing
  Order  Number PB93-168805CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
  Little (Arthur D.), Inc., Cambridge, MA.; Environmental
  Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk Reduction
  Engineering Lab; 1993
  The U.S. Environmental Protection  Agency, either directly or
  through its Superfund contractors, is a major user  of chemi-
  cal protective clothing. The purpose of the study was to de-
  velop estimates  for the cost of using this clothing. These es-
  timates can be  used  to guide purchase decisions  and  use
  practices. For example, economic guidelines would assist in
  decisions pertinent to single-use versus  reusable  clothing.
  Eight cost elements were considered: (1) purchase cost, (2)
  the number of times an item is used, (3) the number of items
  used per day, (4) cost of decontamination, (5) cost of inspec-
  tion, (6) cost of maintenance,  (7)  cost of storage, and (8)
  cost of disposal. Estimates or  assumed inputs  for each of
  these  elements  were developed based on  labor costs, fixed
  costs,  and  recurring costs. The cost elements were com-
  bined  into an economic  (mathematical) model having  the
  single  output of  cost/use.  By comparing cost/use for various
  use scenarios, conclusions are readily reached as to the op-
  timum economics for purchase,  use, and reuse of the cloth-
  ing. In general,  clothing should  be considered disposable if
  its purchase cost is less than its average cost/use per use
  for the anticipated  number of times  it will be reused.
                                                                                                              235

-------
TECHNOLOGY POLICY & ADMINISTRATION:
Miscellaneous Policy & Program Documents
  Specifications:  Pub. in Proceedings of the Performance of
  Protective Clothing, v4 p972-981. Sponsored by Environmen-
  tal Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk Reduction Engi-
  neering Lab. 11 p.
  Subject index keywords: Cost estimates, Protective cloth-
  ing, Chemical compounds, Economic analysis, Occupational
  safety and health, Industrial safety.

1245   Evaluation of Cleanup Levels for Remedial Action at
  CERCLA (Comprehensive Environmental Response,
  Compensation and Liability Act) Sites Based on a
  Review of EPA (Environmental Protection Agency)
  Records of Decision
  Order Number DE89007900CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
  Oak Ridge National Lab., TN.; Department of Energy,
  Washington, DC; Jan 89
  The review revealed that the record  of decision (ROD) is an
  imperfect instrument for examining the issue of how clean is
  clean. The expectation of finding cleanup goals in each ROD
  was  not fulfilled  for at least  four reasons. First, many sites
  are cleaned up in discrete steps or operable units; hence, a
  ROD  may not cover the full  remedy. Second, the technical
  feasibility of cleaning up  a site is  often  unknown.  In such
  cases, cleanup levels are defined after implementation of the
  remedy and not before. Third, the EPA often designs flexibil-
  ity into the remedy selection process. In such cases,  the
  ROD does not make a decision on waste  treatment technol-
  ogy and, hence, the cleanup  goal.  Finally, some RODs  are
  simply deficient, lacking clarity, pertinent text, or substantive
  Information. This review makes it clear that most Superfund
  cleanup goals fall short of  returning sites to a pristine condi-
  tion. However, the EPA has been consistent in its remedy
  selection. Details  may vary, but  the  gross features of reme-
  dies  are largely  consistent and  predictable. Uniform stand-
  ards are not achieved in  each cleanup because  most sites
  present complex and often unique cleanup problems. Reme-
  dies to reduce the toxicity, volume,  or mobility of hazardous
  wastes without land disposal are expensive, technically diffi-
  cult,  and sometimes  unavailable. As a result, the EPA opts
  for practical solutions and  defends  its actions with carefully
  crafted narratives intended to  minimize regulatory, legal, and
  bureaucratic entanglements. Hence,  "clean" becomes what-
  ever can be done at a reasonable cost with the technology
  available and that will be accepted by the public.  18  refs., 2
  figs., 20 tabs. (ERA citation 14:017155)
  Specifications: Portions  of  this document  are  illegible in
  microfiche products. 51 p.
  Subject Index keywords:  Abandoned Sites, Hazardous Ma-
  terials, Pollution Laws, Superfund, Remedial Action.
1246  Evaluation of Exposure  Markers
  Order Number PB91-144675CDH, price: PC A06/MF A01
  Integrated Lab. Systems, Research Triangle Park, NC.;
  Environmental Monitoring Systems Lab., Las Vegas,
  NV.*Army Biomedical Research and Development Lab., Fort
  Detrick, MD; Dec 90
  The primary purpose of the research has been to determine
  the suitability of the single cell gel (SCG) assay technique for
  detecting DNA damage induced  by genotoxic pollutants in
  cells sampled from  various organs of rodents  and in cells
  sampled from humans. The  major  chemicals  evaluated  in-
  clude acrylamide,  trichloroethylene, and dimethylbenzanthra-
  cene. The focus of the research has been on: (1) evaluating
  the specificity and sensitivity of the technique by determining
  the magnitude and kinetics of DNA damage induced in cul-
  tured mammalian cells by a variety of genotoxic chemicals;
  (2)  developing appropriate methods for  isolating individual
  cells from organs of rodents; (3) evaluating the kinetics of
  DNA damage induced in various organs of male mice; (4) ex-
  amining the applicability of the assay to peripheral blood leu-
  kocytes obtained from humans exposed to genotoxic agents;
  and (5) comparing the levels of DNA damage in the organs
  of mice collected at an EPA Superfund site. Based on the
  results  obtained, the technique will provide, with  greater sen-
  sitivity than any other method currently available, data on the
  induction  and  persistence  of  organ-specific levels of DNA
  damage resulting from environmental exposure to genotoxic
  pollutants.
  Specifications:   Sponsored  by  Environmental  Monitoring
  Systems  Lab., Las Vegas, NV., and Army  Biomedical Re-
  search  and Development Lab., Fort Detrick, MD.  109p.
  Subject index keywords: Toxicity,  Mutagenicity tests, DNA
  damage, Biological markers, Environmental pollutants, Single
  gel electrophoresis.

1247  Evaluation of Modifications to Extraction
  Procedures  Used in Analysis of Environmental Samples
  from Superfund Sites
  Order Number PB90-103516CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
  Lockheed Engineering and Sciences Co., Inc., Las Vegas,
  NV.; Environmental Protection Agency, Las Vegas, NV;
  C1989
  Recoveries from an aqueous sample of the  semi-volatile an-
  alytes listed  on the EPA  Target  Compound List are com-
  pared using 6 different methylene chloride extraction proce-
  dures. Four experimental designs incorporating a continuous
  extraction apparatus are evaluated,  and 2 experimental de-
  signs using separatory funnel methods are  tested. In addi-
  tion, 2 concentration procedures are compared, and the loss
  of analytes associated with both  extraction  and concentra-
  tion procedures are determined. These studies indicate that
  the most  efficient and economical technique for the extrac-
  tion of these compounds from an  aqueous matrix is a single
  continuous extraction  procedure performed at 2 pH.
  Specifications: Pub. in Jnl. of the Association of Official An-
  alytical  Chemists, v72 n4 p602-608 1989. Sponsored by En-
  vironmental Protection Agency, Las Vegas, NV. 9p.
  Subject index keywords: Chemical analysis, Waste dispos-
  al, Site  surveys, Solvent extraction, Superfund program.

1248  Evaluation of Personal Cooling Devices for Dioxin
  Clean-Up Operation
  Order Number PB92-206895CDH, price: PC A05/MF A01
  Little (Arthur  D.), Inc.,  Cambridge, MA.; Multi-Tech, Inc.,
  Natick,  MA.*Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati,
  OH. Risk Reduction Engineering Lab; 7 Sep 88
  The study investigated  the  use  of  personal coolers to in-
  crease  worker productivity and safety while  working at ele-
  vated, ambient temperatures cleaning up  dioxin  contaminat-
  ed soil. The  study included laboratory tests  to measure the
  thermal characteristics of the chemical  protective clothing
  worn and the performance of ice vest and vortex personal
  coolers. In addition,  field tests were conducted at a dioxin
  clean-up site to evaluate the performance  of these two types
  of personal coolers. The use of personal  coolers was found
  to be an effective method of reducing the  risk of heat stress.
  In addition, workers  were able to work continuously in hot
236

-------
                                                                    TECHNOLOGY POLICY & ADMINISTRATION:
                                                                    Miscellaneous Policy & Program Documents
  weather without following the procedure normally used to de-
  crease heat stress, i.e., working one hour followed by one
  hour of resting. Both types of personal coolers were accepta-
  ble for the task being performed.
  Specifications:  See also  PB86-236122 and PB86-176344.
  Prepared in cooperation with  Multi-Tech, Inc., Natick, MA.
  Sponsored  by  Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati,
  OH. Risk Reduction Engineering Lab. 84p.
  Subject index keywords: Dioxin, Protective equipment, Per-
  sonal cooling devices, Superfund sites.

1249   Evaluation of Terrestrial Indicators for Use in
  Ecological Assessments at Hazardous Waste Sites
  Order Number PB93-100865GDH, price: PC A12/MF A03
  ManTech Environmental Technology, Inc., Corvallis, OR.;
  Missouri Univ.-Columbia.**Battelle Pacific Northwest Labs.,
  Richland, WA.*Corvallis Environmental Research Lab., OR;
  24 Sep 92
  The  target  audience for  the compendium includes regional
  project managers and biological technical assistance groups.
  The methods summarized are grouped according to their po-
  tential target or receptor classification;  animal,  plant, or mi-
  crobial. Methods which assess soils directly are emphasized
  here but additional methods applicable to wetlands  soils or
  sediments have also been included to complement those
  methods readily available for aquatic and sediment toxicity
  assessment. Some of the methods summarized  represent
  consensus standards that have previously been identified as
  methods applicable to soil testing, while others are less well
  characterized but remain  potential candidate  methods for bi-
  ological  evaluation of soil contamination.  Tabular guides to
  the selection of tests methods applicable to various habitats
  and toxicity endpoints are summarized to help potential users
  select the most appropriate biological  assessment tool for
  the site under consideration.
  Specifications: See also  PB89-205967.  Prepared in coop-
  eration with Missouri  Univ.-Columbia,  and   Battelle  Pacific
  Northwest Labs., Richland, WA. Sponsored by Corvallis Envi-
  ronmental Research Lab., OR. 255p.
  Subject index keywords: Terrestrial  ecosystems, Hazard-
  ous materials, Waste disposal, Superfund, Biological effects.

1250   Factors Affecting the Applicability of Plasma
  Systems to the Cleanup of Superfund Sites
  Order Number PB91-162784CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk
  Reduction Engineering Lab; 1991
  For the  past ten years,  the U.S. Environmental Protection
  Agency  (EPA)  has been evaluating plasma-based thermal
  treatment systems for  hazardous waste. Although many at-
  tempts have been made to  evaluate these devices, very little
  performance data have been gathered. EPA is still  interested
  in  evaluating the  usefulness  of plasma  based  hazardous
  waste treatment and routinely receives  proposals for testing
  new  and different plasma systems.  Unfortunately, however,
  elements of many  of  these proposals suggest  that these
  studies would be a little more successful than previous ones.
  Part  of the reason for this may be that the developers of
  plasma systems do not clearly understand what is required
  of  a  hazardous  waste treatment   system,   especially one
  which will be used to  treat hazardous wastes onsite. The
  paper discusses factors that,  based on EPA's  experience,
  are key to the successful implementation of  a plasma-based
  waste treatment process.
  Specifications: Presented at Annual Conference on Plasma
  Applications, (1st) Idaho Falls, ID., January 15-17, 1991. 11 p.
  Subject index keywords: Superfund, Remedial action, Haz-
  ardous materials, Waste treatment, Plasma heating, Cleanup.

1251  Field Applications of Robotic Systems in Hazardous
  Environments, p1-29 1993. See also PB86-176344 and
  PB92-166743
  Order Number PB93-229755CDH,  price: PC A03/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency,  Cincinnati, OH. Risk
  Reduction Engineering Lab; c1993
  The chapter addresses field applications of robotic systems
  at hazardous waste sites and in handling hazardous materi-
  als. Included are an overview of EPA's  current programs, as
  they relate  to robotic technology  at hazardous waste sites;
  potential application of robotics at those waste sites; exam-
  ples of EPA's robotics projects; and the benefits  of robotics
  to EPA.
  Specifications: 34p.
  Subject index keywords: Robots, Hazardous materials, Oc-
  cupational safety and health.

1252  Forum on Innovative Hazardous Waste Treatment
  Technologies: Domestic and International. Held in
  Atlanta, Georgia on June 19-21,  1989. Abstract
  Proceedings
  Order Number PB90-268509CDH,  price: PC A04/MF A01
  JACA Corp., Fort Washington, PA.; Environmental  Protection
  Agency, Washington, DC. Office of Emergency and Remedial
  Response; Sep 89
  On  June 19-21, 1989, the U.S.  Environmental  Protection
  Agency's Office of Program  Management and Technology
  hosted an  international conference in  Atlanta,  GA, to ex-
  change  solutions to hazardous waste  treatment problems.
  During the conference, scientists and engineers representing
  government  agencies,  industry, and academia  attended  30
  presentations describing successful case studies of physical/
  chemical,  biological,  thermal,  and stabilization  treatment
  methods. In addition, domestic and  international scientists
  and vendors presented over 40 posters  explaining their treat-
  ment methods and results.
  Specifications: See also PB90-183799. Sponsored by Envi-
  ronmental  Protection  Agency,  Washington,  DC. Office  of
  Emergency  and Remedial Response. 56p.
  Subject index keywords: Ground water, Hazardous wastes,
  Waste treatment, Meetings, Superfund.

1253  Forum on Innovative Hazardous Waste Treatment
  Technologies: Domestic and International. Held in
  Atlanta, Georgia on June 19-21, 1989. Technical Papers
  Order Number PB90-183799CDH, price: PC A15/MF A02
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Solid Waste and Emergency Response;  Sep 89
  As a result  of the high level of interest  in innovative hazard-
  ous waste control technologies, U.S. EPA's  Office of Solid
  Waste and  Emergency Response  and Risk Reduction Engi-
  neering  Laboratory jointly  conducted this conference. The
  conference  consisted of presentations of technical papers
  and posters by international and domestic vendors of tech-
  nologies for the treatment of waste, sludge, and contaminat-
  ed soils at uncontrolled hazardous waste disposal sites. The
  purpose of  the 21/2 day conference was two-fold:  to help
  introduce promising international technologies through tech-
                                                                                                               237

-------
 TECHNOLOGY POLICY & ADMINISTRATION:
 Miscellaneous Policy & Program Documents
   nical paper and poster displays; and to showcase results of
   the U.S. EPA Superfund Innovative Technology Evaluation
   program technologies in addition to other domestic innova-
   tive technologies. Both were aimed at  increasing awareness
   of the user community in technologies ready for application.
   The compendium does not include all papers that were pre-
   sented; only those that were made  available by authors and
   their institutions are included.
   Specifications: 328p.
   Subject Index keywords:  Meetings,  Hazardous  materials,
   Waste  treatment,  Pollution  control, Technology  utilization,
   Land pollution.

 1254 Forum on Innovative Hazardous Waste Treatment
   Technologies (3rd): Domestic and International. Held in
   Dallas, Texas on June 11-13, 1991. Technical Papers
   Order Number PB92-219732CDH, price: PC A22/MF A04
   Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
   Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Sep 91
   On June 11-13,  1991,  the  U.S. Environmental Protection
   Agency's Technology  Innovation Office and Risk Reduction
   Engineering Laboratory hosted an international conference in
   Dallas, TX, to exchange solutions to hazardous waste treat-
   ment problems. This conference, the Third Forum on Innova-
   tive Hazardous Waste Treatment  Technologies:  Domestic
   and International,  was attended by approximately 750 repre-
   sentatives  from  the  U.S.  and several foreign  countries.
   During the conference, scientists and engineers representing
   government agencies, industry, and academia  attended 37
   presentations describing domestic and  international technol-
   ogies for the  treatment of waste, sludges, and contaminated
   soils at uncontrolled hazardous waste  disposal sites. Tech-
   nologies included  physical/chemical, biological, thermal, and
   stabilization techniques presented by EPA and other federal
   government agency contractors. Domestic and  international
   scientists and vendors presented  over  50 posters explaining
   their treatment methods and results.
   Specifications: See also PB91-145649. 514p.
   Subject index  keywords:  Meetings,  Hazardous  materials,
   Waste treatment, Technology innovation.
 1255 Furthering the Use of Innovative Treatment
   Technologies In OSWER Programs
   Order Number PB91-921336CDH,  price: PC A03/MF A01
   Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
   Emergency and Remedial Response; 10 Jun 91
  The  Office  of Solid  Waste  and  Emergency Response
   (OSWER), in  this  directive, is seeking  to further the use of
  innovative treatment technologies  in  order  to (1)  better
   pursue  its statutory and regulatory mandates  to  promote
  treatment to the maximum extent practicable; (2) speed the
  availability of performance data regarding newly developed
  treatment technologies to many constituencies  facing  man-
  dates  to clean contaminated  sites; (3) broaden the inventory
  of accepted treatment-based solutions; and (4) increase the
  likelihood the remediation costs can be lowered in  the near
  term through  the demonstration of a larger number of engi-
  neering options to solve site remediation problems.
  Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
  posit account required (minimum deposit $150 U.S., Canada,
  and Mexico; all others $300). Single copies also available in
  paper copy or microfiche. 22p.
  Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
  Waste treatment, Hazardous materials, Office of Solid Waste
  and Emergency Response.

1256  Furthering the Use of Innovative Treatment
  Technologies in  OSWER  Programs
  Order Number PB91-921366CDH, price: PC A01/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Emergency and Remedial Response; Aug 91
  The fact sheet provides an overview of directive  9380.0-17,
  Furthering  the Use of Innovative Treatment Technologies in
  OSWER Programs. The Office of Solid Waste and Emergen-
  cy Response (OSWER) is  seeking to further the use of inno-
  vative treatment technologies in order to (1) better pursue its
  statutory and regulatory mandates to  promote treatment to
  the maximum extent practicable, (2) speed the availability of
  performance data regarding newly developed treatment tech-
  nologies to many constituencies facing mandates to clean
  contaminated sites, (3)  broaden the inventory of accepted
  treatment-based solutions  and (4) increase the likelihood the
  remediation costs can be lowered.
  Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
  posit account required (minimum deposit $150 U.S., Canada,
  and Mexico; all others $300). Single copies also  available in
  paper copy or microfiche. 5p.
  Subject index keywords:  Hazardous materials, Waste treat-
  ment, Superfund,  Clean up.

1257  Future of  Expert Systems in the Environmental
  Protection Agency
  Order Number PB91-162727CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH.  Risk
  Reduction  Engineering Lab.; Computer Sciences Corp.,
  Cincinnati,  OH;  c1989
  As in other organizations, the history of expert systems in the
  Environmental Protection Agency is very short. Approximate-
  ly five years ago, the focus of the expert systems activities
  was to assess the feasibility and utility as  environmental de-
  cision aids. Last year the Agency approved a five year fund-
  ing initiative to support development of a number of systems
  to  assist in management  and implementation of  Superfund
  activities. Whereas initial systems were limited to  a few engi-
  neering and technical issues, the scope of todays systems
  includes legal, regulatory and administrative issues. Notwith-
  standing this rapid evolution  in scope and funding, expert
  systems are not currently  mainstream decision making tools
  in  the  Environmental  Protection  Agency. Many decision
  makers are either not familiar  with expert systems or are
  skeptical  that  they  can  provide  meaningful and  reliable
  advice.  Since expert systems are  so new and have not yet
  been proved for wide spread application in regulatory envi-
  ronment, their future is uncertain. With this background, the
  paper will  propose one  or more scenarios for the future of
  expert systems in the Environmental Protection Agency.
  (Copyright  (c) 1990 American Chemical Society.)
  Specifications:  Presented at the American Chemical Socie-
  ty Conference, Miami, FL.,  September 10-15, 1989. Prepared
  in  cooperation  with Computer  Sciences  Corp.,  Cincinnati,
  OH. 10p.
  Subject index keywords:  Environmental tests, US EPA, En-
  vironmental management, Expert systems.
238

-------
                                                                    TECHNOLOGY POLICY & ADMINISTRATION:
                                                                    Miscellaneous Policy & Program Documents
1258  Granular Activated Carbon Treatment. Engineering
  Bulletin
  Order Number PB92-180058CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Emergency and Remedial Response; Oct 91
  Granular  activated carbon (GAC)  treatment  is a physico-
  chemical  process that removes a  wide variety of contami-
  nants by  adsorbing them from  liquid and gas streams.  The
  treatment is most commonly  used  to separate organic con-
  taminants  from  water or air;  however, it can  be used to
  remove a limited number of inorganic contaminants. In most
  cases, the contaminants are collected in concentrated form
  on the GAC, and further treatment is required.  Site-specific
  treatability studies are generally necessary to  document the
  applicability and  potential  performance  of  a  GAC system.
  The bulletin provides  information on the technology applica-
  bility, technology  limitations,  a technology description,  the
  types  of  residuals produced, site  requirements, latest  per-
  formance data, status of the technology, and sources for fur-
  ther information.
  Specifications:   See also  PB87-110656 and  PB89-132674.
  9p.
  Subject index keywords: Waste treatment, Granular activat-
  ed carbon treatment, Hazardous materials, Water pollution
  control, Remedial action.

1259  Guidance Documents Relating to Landfills and
  Contaminants
  Order Number PB90-261835CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk
  Reduction Engineering Lab; 1990
  The Environmental Protection Agency is developing and up-
  dating a series of Technical Guidance Documents to provide
  best engineering control technology to meet the needs of the
  Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) and  the
  Comprehensive Environmental Response Compensation  and
  Liability Act (CERCLA), respectively.  These documents  are
  the compilation  of the research efforts to  date relating to
  containment of pollutants from waste disposal to the land as
  relates  to residuals management.  The specific areas  of re-
  search being conducted under the  RCRA land disposal pro-
  gram relates to laboratory, pilot and field validation  studies in
  cover systems, waste leaching and solidification,  liner sys-
  tems and disposal facility evaluation. The specific areas of
  research being conducted  under the CERCLA uncontrolled
  waste sites (Superfund) program relate to in situ treatment,
  solidification/stabilization  for treating hazardous waste, com-
  bustion technologies,  best demonstrated available  technolo-
  gy (BOAT), on-site treatment technologies, emerging biosys-
  tems,  expert systems, personnel  health protection  equip-
  ment, and site and situation assessment. The Guidance Doc-
  uments are intended to assist both  the regulated community
  and  the permitting authorities, as well  as the  Program  Of-
  fices, and Regions, as well as the states and other interested
  parties, with the latest information relevant to waste manage-
  ment.
  Specifications:   Presented at  the Annual  Recycling Con-
  gress (6th), Berlin, Germany, November 28-30, 1989. Up.
  Subject index keywords: Guidelines, Earth fills, Hazardous
  materials,  Best technology, Land disposal.
1260  Guidance on Remedial Actions for Superfund Sites
  with PCIB Contamination
  Order Number PB91-145466CDH, price: PC A08/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Emergency and Remedial Response; Aug 90
  The  document  describes the recommended approach  for
  evaluating and  remediating  Superfund  sites  with PCB con-
  tamination.  It provides starting point cleanup levels for vari-
  ous media  that may  become contaminated  and identifies
  other  considerations  important  to ensuring  protection of
  human health and the  environment that these cleanup levels
  may not address. The guidance also describes how to devel-
  op remedial alternatives for PCB  contaminated materials that
  are consistent with Superfund  program  expectations  and re-
  quirements. The guidance concludes with a discussion of
  considerations unique to PCBs that should be considered in
  the nine criteria evaluation and likely tradeoffs between op-
  tions that are likely to occur.
  Specifications:  Also available from Supt. of Docs. 151 p.
  Subject  index  keywords: Chlorine organic compounds,
  Hazardous materials, Pollution control, Superfund.

1261  Guidance on Remedial Actions for Superfund Sites
  with PCI3 Contamination
  Order Number PB91-921206CDH, price: PC A07/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Emergency and  Remedial Response; Aug 90
  The document describes the recommend approach for evalu-
  ating and remediating  Superfund  sites with PCB contamina-
  tion.  It should be used  as  aguide  in the investigation  and
  remedy selection process for  PCB-contaminated Superfund
  sites.  The guidance provides preliminary remediation goals
  for various  media that may be contaminated and identifies
  other  considerations important  to ensuring  protection of
  human health and the  environment. In addition, potential ap-
  plicable or relevant  and appropriate requirements (ARARs)
  and 'to-be-considered' criteria pertinent to Superfund sites
  with PCB contamination and their integration  into the RI/FS
  and remedy selection  process are summarized. The guid-
  ance also describes how to develop remedial  alternatives for
  PCB contaminated materials that are consistent with Super-
  fund program expectations and ARARs.  To identify the areas
  for which a response action should be  considered,  starting
  point  concentrations (preliminary cleanup goals)  for each
  media are identified.
  Specifications:  Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
  posit account required  (minimum  deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
  and Mexico;  all others  $400). Single copies also available in
  paper copy or microfiche. 148p.
  Subject index keywords: Public health, Hazardous  materi-
  als, Pollution control, Superfund, Polychlorinated biphenyl.

1262  Guide on Remedial Actions at Superfund Sites with
  PCB Contamination
  Order Number PB90-274432CDH, price:  PC A02/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Emergency and Remedial Response; Aug 90
  The fact  sheet  summarizes pertinent considerations in the
  development,  evaluation, and selection of remedial actions at
  Superfund sites with  PCB contamination. It provides a gener-
  al framework for determining cleanup levels, identifying treat-
  ment  options, and assessing necessary management con-
  trols for residuals.                       ,
                                                                                                              239

-------
TECHNOLOGY POLICY & ADMINISTRATION:
Miscellaneous Policy & Program Documents
  Specifications: 8p.
  Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Guidelines,
  Superfund, Waste management, Office of Solid Waste and
  Emergency Response, Remedial action, Polychlorinated  bi-
  phenyls.

1263  Horsehead Resource Development Company, Inc.
  Flame Reactor Technology: Applications Analysis Report
  Order Number PB92-213214CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
  PRC Environmental Management, Inc., Chicago, IL;
  Horsehead Resource Development Co., Inc., Monaca,
  PA.*Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk
  Reduction Engineering Lab; May 92
  A SfTE demonstration of the Horsehead Resource Develop-
  ment  (HRD)  Company, Inc.  Flame Reactor Technology was
  conducted in March 1991 at  the HRD facility in Monaca,
  Pennsylvania. For the demonstration, secondary lead smelter
  soda  slag was treated to produce  a potentially recyclable
  lead-  and zinc-enrichecl oxide  product and a nonhazardous
  (based on the regulatory requirements of the Toxicity Char-
  acteristic test) effluent slag. The lead and zinc in the oxide
  product were concentrated about threefold  from  the feed
  concentrations. The effluent slag was determined to be non-
  hazardous based qn extraction by the Toxicity Characteristic
  Leaching Procedure. Potential  wastes that might be  treated
  include industrial residues, Resource Conservation and Re-
  covery Act wastes, Superfund wastes, and other wastes con-
  taminated with metals and organic wastes.
  Specifications:  See also PB92-139401 and PB92-505822.
  Prepared in cooperation with Horsehead Resource Develop-
  ment  Co., Inc., Monaca,  PA.  Sponsored  by Environmental
  Protection Agency,  Cincinnati,  OH. Risk Reduction Engineer-
  ing Lab. 70p.
  Subject Index keywords: Thermal reactors, Materials recov-
  ery, Waste treatment, Superfund Innovative Technology Eval-
  uation Program, Horsehead Resource Development Compa-
  ny.
1264 Horsehead Resource Development Company, Inc.,
  Flame Reactor Technology. Technology Demonstration
  Summary
  Order Number PB93-145639CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk
  Reduction Engineering Lab; Oct 92
  Under the  Superfund Innovative  Technology  Evaluation
  (SITE) program, the Horsehead  Resource  Development
  Company, Inc., (HRD)  Flame Reactor was evaluated during a
  series of test runs. The tests were conducted at the HRD fa-
  cility in Monaca, PA, using 72 tons of secondary lead smelter
  soda  slag (waste feed) from the National Smelting and Refin-
  ing Company, Inc.,  site in Atlanta, GA. The waste feed con-
  tained lead,  zinc, iron, and many other metals  and inorganic
  compounds. This summary includes  an overview of the dem-
  onstration, a technology description,  analytical results, and
  conclusions.
  Specifications: See also PB92-213214. 8p.
  Subject  index keywords: Waste treatment, Technology in-
  novation, Slags,  Hazardous materials, Superfund Innovative
  Technology Evaluation Program, HRD flame reactor.
1265  Hydraulic Fracturing Technology: Technology
  Evaluation Report and Application Analysis Report
  Order Number PB94-100161CDH, price: PC A08/MF A02
  PRC Environmental Management, Inc., Rolling Meadows, IL;
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Emergency and Remedial Response; Aug 93
  Two pilot-scale demonstrations of the hydraulic fracturing
  technology for enhancing  the permeability of contaminated
  silty clays have been evaluated under the Superfund Innova-
  tive Technology Evaluation  (SITE) Program. The  hydraulic
  fracturing technology was demonstrated in 1991  and 1992 at
  a extraction site in Oak Brook, Illinois, and at a bioremedia-
  tion site near Dayton, Ohio. The technology was jointly de-
  veloped by the University of Cincinnati (UC) and the Risk Re-
  duction Engineering Laboratory. Tests were also conducted
  at UC  Center Hill  Solid  and  Hazardous Waste Research
  (Center Hill)  Facility by UC.  These tests were conducted  to
  determine the factors affecting soil vapor flow through sand-
  filled hydraulic fractures.
  Specifications:  Sponsored by  Environmental Protection
  Agency, Washington, DC. Office of Emergency and Remedial
  Response. 150p.
  Subject index  keywords: Hydraulic fracturing, Superfund,
  Remedial action.
1266   Implementation Plan for the Record of Decision for
  Disposal of Hanford Defense High-Level, Transuranic,
  and Tank Wastes
  Order Number DE89010128CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
  Department of Energy, Ricfiland, WA. Richland Operations
  Office.; Department of Energy, Washington, DC; Jun 88
  The Record  of  Decision concludes one phase  and initiates
  another leading to the disposal of  two thirds (by radioactivity)
  of the defense waste at Hanford.  It also commits to continu-
  ing  evaluations for  most of the remaining one third before
  final disposal or remediation decisions are made.  The US
  Department of Energy (DOE) has decided to implement the
  preferred alternative. The  preferred alternative recommends
  disposal  of  double-shell  tank  waste,  and  encapsulated
  cesium and  strontium waste. Also to be disposed of is the
  only solid waste site from before 1970 suspected of being
  contaminated with  transufanic  elements  and not on  Han-
  ford's central plateau. This site is near the commercial nucle-
  ar power plant operated  by the  Washington  Public Power
  Supply System  (WNP-2). Disposal costs stated in  this plan,
  including  costs for  construction  of  disposal  facilities, are
  taken from the HDW-EIS. Schedules for disposal activities
  are from the Hanford Waste Management Plan (DOE/RL 87-
  13). Schedules for development and evaluation  activities are
  from the  Hanford  Waste  Management  Technology  Plan
  (DOE/RL 87-14). Estimated  costs and schedules are subject
  to change as activities proceed, implementing requirements
  of environmental regulations are  further defined,  more de-
  tailed studies are performed, policy decisions are  made  af-
  fecting work scope (e.g., the decision to place N Reactor in
  cold standby), and funding levels are  defined through the
  Federal budgeting process. The Hanford Waste Management
  Plan and the Hanford Waste Management Technology Plan
  are revised annually to provide updated information on costs
  and schedules for disposal  and development  activities.
  These  or their successors should be referred to for current
  information on disposal plans, costs, and schedules.  Dispos-
  al operations will be conducted in compliance with all appli-
 240

-------
                                                                     TECHNOLOGY POLICY & ADMINISTRATION*.
                                                                     Miscellaneous Policy & Program Documents
  cable environmental regulations, standards, and permit  re-
  quirements. (ERA citation 14:024166)
  Specifications:  Portions of this document are  illegible in
  microfiche products. 29p.
  Subject  index keywords:  High-Level Radioactive  Wastes,
  Planning, Radioactive Waste Management.

1267  Incineration Data on Arsenic and Lead Emissions
  Order Number PB92-179043CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
  Kennesaw State Coll., Marietta, GA.; Environmental
  Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk Reduction
  Engineering Lab; 1992
  Since 1988, nine test programs have been conducted at the
  Environmental Protection Agency Incineration Research Fa-
  cility aimed at evaluating the fate of trace metals in the rotary
  kiln incineration of hazardous wastes and Superfund  site ma-
  terials. Results of six of those test programs have been  re-
  ported to date. Of these six, two were parametric test series
  using a synthetic hazardous waste formulation and four  were
  incineration treatability test programs  using contaminated Su-
  perfund  site materials. Results of these  six text programs
  show remarkably consistent arsenic and lead partitioning be-
  havior  among the  incinerator system  discharge streams.
  Overall test programs lead exhibits relatively nonvolatile be-
  havior over a  kiln temperature range from nominally 815 C
  (1,500 F) to 980 C (1.800F) provided no chlorine is present
  in the feed material. Arsenic also exhibits relatively nonvola-
  tile behavior over the same  temperature range regardless of
  whether the feed contains chlorine at levels up to nominally
  8 percent. Arsenic may be more volatile in the incineration of
  environmental samples such as Superfund site wastes than it
  is from a synthetic waste in which arsenic is introduced  as
  As2O3 in aqueous solution.  However, even with environmen-
  tal samples, behavior is relatively nonvolatile. Lead  volatility
  significantly increases at all kiln  temperatures as feed chlo-
  rine content increases from 0 to as high as 8 percent.
  Specifications:   Sponsored  by Environmental  Protection
  Agency,  Cincinnati,  OH.  Risk Reduction Engineering  Lab.
  14p.
  Subject index keywords: Waste disposal,  Incineration, Air
  pollution control equipment, Arsenic, Lead(Metal).

1268  Incineration Treatment of Arsenic-Contaminated
  Soil
  Order Number  PB91-183541CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
  Acurex Corp.,  Mountain View, CA.; Environmental Protection
  Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk Reduction Engineering Lab:
  c1991
  An incineration test program was conducted at the US Envi-
  ronmental Protection Agency's Incineration Research Facility
  to evaluate the potential of incineration as a treatment option
  for contaminated soils at the Baird and McGuire Superfund
  site in Holbrook, Massachusetts. The purpose of these tests
  was to evaluate the incinerability  of these soils in terms  of
  the fate of arsenic and lead and  the destruction of  organic
  contaminants during the incineration  process. The test  pro-
  gram consisted of a series of bench-scale experiments  with
  a muffle furnace and a series of incineration tests in a pilot-
  scale rotary kiln incinerator system. The study reported in the
  paper was funded by the Environmental  Protection  Agency
  under Contract 68-C9-0038 to Acurex Corporation.  It  has
  been subjected to the Agency's review and has been ap-
  proved for publication. Mention of trade names or commer-
  cial products does not constitute endorsement or recommen-
  dation for use.
  Specifications:  Pub. in Remediation, p227-237 Spring 1991.
  Sponsored by Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati,
  OH. Risk Reduction Engineering Lab. 13p.
  Subject index keywords: Incineration, Remedial action, Soil
  contamination, Waste  management, Superfund, Air pollution
  control.

 1269 Innovative Operational Treatment Technologies for
  Application to Superfund Site: Nine Case Studies
  Order Number PB90-202656CDH, price: PC A07/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Solid Waste and  Emergency Response; Apr 90
  Nine case studies are presented in a report that was de-
  signed to  identify and obtain operational data from ongoing
  and completed remediation efforts. The case studies are pre-
  sented as appendices, and provide process  descriptions,
  performance, operational  and cost data. The nine appendi-
  ces present case studies on the following topics. Incineration
  of Explosives and Contaminated soils. Groundwater  Extrac-
  tion with Air Stripping, Groundwater Biodegradation Treat-
  ment System, Ground Extraction and Treatment, Groundwat-
  er Extraction with Air Stripping and Soil Vacuum  Extraction,
  Groundwater Extraction with  Physical Chemical and Biologi-
  cal Treatment, and Chemical Treatment of Groundwater and
  Soil Flushing.
  Specifications:  147p.
  Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste treat-
  ment.

1270 Innovative Technology: BEST Solvent Extraction
  Process
  Order Number PB90-274218CDH, price: PC A01/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Emergency and Remedial Response; Nov 89
  The fact sheet provides technology description, site charac-
  teristics affecting treatment feasibility,  technology consider-
  ations, and technology status for the BEST solvent extraction
  process. The sheet describes  the  BEST  process as using
  one or more secondary or tertiary amines to separate toxic
  wastes and oils from sludges or soils.
  Specifications:  5p.
  Subject index keywords:  Hazardous materials, Solvent ex-
  traction, Superfund, Waste  management,  Office of Solid
  Waste and Emergency Response, Best technology.

1271  Innovative Technology: Slurry-Phase
  Biodegradation
  Order Number PB90-274200CDH, price: PC A01/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Emergency and Remedial Response; Nov 89
  The fact sheet provides technology description, site charac-
  teristics affecting treatment feasibility, technology consider-
  ations, and technology  status for Slurry Phase  Biodegrada-
  tion (SPB). The sheet describes how SPB is potentially effec-
  tive in treating various organic contaminants.
  Specifications:  5p.
  Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Biodeterior-
  ation, Slurries, Waste treatment, Superfund, Waste manage-
  ment, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response, Re-
  medial action.
                                                                                                               241

-------
TECHNOLOGY POLICY & ADMINISTRATION:
Miscellaneous Policy & Program Documents
1272   Innovative Treatment Technologies: Overview and
  Guide to Information Sources
  Order Number PB92-1791)01 CDH, price: PC A20/MF A04
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Oct 91
  Content: The  document is a compilation of information on in-
  novative treatment technologies being used in the Superfund
  program and is intended to assist site project managers, con-
  sultants, responsible parties, and owner/operators in their ef-
  forts  to identify current literature on innovative treatment
  technologies for hazardous waste remediation on corrective
  action. The technologies addressed in the guide include the
  following:  Incineration,  Thermal  Desorption,  Soil  Washing,
  Solvent Extraction, Dechlorination, Bioremediation,  Vacuum
  Extraction, Vitrification,  and Ground Water Treatment.  Also
  included in the guide for the user's reference are  summary
  statistics of EPA's selection and application  of innovative
  treatment technologies  between 1982 and 1990. In addition
  the guide provides for  each technology  a detailed descrip-
  tion, status of development and application, strengths, weak-
  nesses and materials handling considerations. A comprehen-
  sive bibliography  for each technology can be  found within
  each chapter.
  Specifications: 460p.
  Subject Index keywords: Superfund, Hazardous  materials,
  Waste treatment,  Remedial action, Waste disposal.
 1273  Innovative Treatment Technologies: Semi-Annual
  Status Report (Fourth Edition)
  Order Number PB93-133387CDH, price: PC A05/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC.
  Technology Innovation Office; Oct 92
  The twice yearly  report contains site-specific information on
  Superfund sites (both remedial and emergency  response ac-
  tions) and non-Superfund sites  (within the  Departments of
  Defense and Energy)  where innovative treatment technol-
  ogies have been or are  being  used. Innovative  treatment
  technologies are  treatment technologies for which a lack of
  dat£j on cost and  performance makes their selection and use
  at Superfund sites more difficult. The report documents the
  use of the following innovative treatment  technologies to
  treat ground water in situ, soils, sediments, sludge,  and solid-
  matrix  wastes; bioremediation (ex situ),  bioremediation (in
  situ), chemical treatment,  dechlorination, in situ flushing,  in
  situ vitrification, soil  vapor extraction, soil washing, solvent
  extraction, thermal desorption, and other technologies.
   Specifications: See also PB92-173210. 87p.
   Subject Index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste treat-
   ment. Ground water, Soils, Superfund, Remedial action.
 1274   Innovative Treatment Technologies: Semi-Annual
   Status Report, January 1991. First Issue
   Order Number PB91-921290CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
   Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
   Emergency and Remedial Response;  Jan 91
   The document was developed to provide information on spe-
   cific sites that have selected  or used innovative treatment
   technologies. The information serves  several purposes: (1) to
   track the progress of innovative technology use; (2) to pro-
   vide market information to technology vendors; and (3) to fa-
   cilitate communication among innovative technology users.
   Specifications: Paper  copy available on Standing  Order, de-
   posit account required  (minimum deposit $200  U.S., Canada,
  and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
  paper copy or microfiche. 30p.
  Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste treat-
  ment, Superfund.

1275  Innovative Treatment Technologies: Semi-Annual
  Status  Report. (Third Edition)
  Order Number PB92-173210CDH, price: PC A05/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Apr 92
  The twice-yearly report  contains site-specific information on
  Superfund sites  (both remedial and emergency response ac-
  tions) where innovative treatment technologies have been or
  are being  used. Innovative treatment technologies are treat-
  ment technologies for which a lack of data on cost and per-
  formance  makes their selection and  use at Superfund sites
  more difficult. The report documents the use of the following
  innovative treatment technologies to  treat ground water in
  situ, soils, sediments, sludge, and solid-matrix wastes; biore-
  mediation  (ex situ), bioremediation (in situ),  chemical treat-
  ment, dechlorination, in situ flushing, in situ vitrification, soil
  vapor extraction, soil washing, solvent extraction, thermal de-
  sorption, and other technologies. The  report  includes  infor-
  mation on 210 applications of innovative  treatment technol-
  ogies for Superfund remedial actions and  18 applications for
  emergency response actions. The April 1992 issue updates
  the status of each project  listed in the  September  1991
  report.  Additions to the report include 70  innovative  treat-
  ment technologies selected for remedial  actions  in Fiscal
  Year 1991 Superfund Records of Decision (RODs) and more
  detailed information on completed projects.
  Specifications: Supersedes PB91-921290. 91 p.
  Subject index  keywords: Superfund,  Remedial action,
  Waste  treatment, Water  pollution  control,  Innovative  treat-
  ment technologies.

 1276  Installation Restoration Program. Technical Support
  Document for Record  of Decision,  Cape Newenham, AFS
  Order Number AD-A193 502/2CDH, price: PC A05/MF A01
  Woodward-Clyde Consultants, Anchorage, AK; 18 Jan 88
  This record of decision and supplemental support document
  applies to six potential  hazardous waste sites identified at
  Cape Newenham AFS. The recommendations for all six sites
  are the same; therefore, a single document for the entire in-
  stallation  is warranted. Information presented in  this  docu-
  ment supports a finding that there is  no significant impact on
  human health or the environment from  suspected or con-
  firmed past contamination at the Cape Newenham AFS. The
  recommended remedy is no further action with  regard to in-
  vestigation or clean-up of six (6) sites identified as possible
  areas of contamination  at the Air Force station.
  Specifications:  76p.
  Subject index keywords:  Hazardous materials, Waste dis-
  posal.
 1277  Installation Restoration Program Technical Support
  Document for  Record of Decision, Tatalina Air Force
  Station LRRS Site
  Order  Number AD-A202 315/8CDH, price: PC A05/MF A01
  Woodward-Clyde Consultants, Anchorage, AK; 29 Feb 88
  The Tatalina Air Force Station (AFS), located in the  south-
  central interior  of Alaska, was investigated under Phase I of
  the Installation Restoration  Program  (IRP). The  findings of
 242

-------
                                                                     TECHNOLOGY POLICY & ADMINISTRATION:
                                                                     Miscellaneous Policy & Program Documents
   that study indicated eleven potentially contaminated hazard-
   ous waste areas at the installation. The report recommended
   follow-up action for all sites. A 1987  field visit verified that
   clean up has occurred at several sites. No evidence of signif-
   icant contamination was observed  at the sites where cleanup
   activities had not occurred. The following document presents
   the  information collected in  support of no further action at
   Tatalma AFS. Keywords: Solid waste disposal, Risk screen-
   ing.  (KR)
   Specifications:  79p.
   Subject index keywords: Air Force facilities, Waste dispos-
   al, Inspection.

 1278  International  Conference on New Frontiers for
   Hazardous Waste Management (Third) Proceedings. Held
   in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania on September 10-13,1989
   Order Number PB90-127200CDH, price: Call for price
   PEI Associates, Inc., Cincinnati, OH.;  IT Corp., Knoxville
   TN.*Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk
   Reduction Engineering Lab.*United Nations Environment
   Programme, Paris (France).*World  Federation of Engineering
   Organizations, Pasadena, CA; c1989
   The  Third  International  Conference on  New Frontiers for
   Hazardous Waste  Management  was  held  at  Pittsburgh
   Pennsylvania,  September 10-13, 1989. The  purpose of the
   conference was to examine  the state of technology for the
   disposal of hazardous waste. Emphasis was  placed on the
   presentation of papers that summarized important new tech-
   nological developments and concepts with broad internation-
   al application.  Sessions were held  in the areas of:  (1)  Ther-
   mal Treatment, (2)  Physical/Chemical Treatment, (3) Biologi-
   cal Treatment, (4) Land Disposal, (5) Solidification/Stabiliza-
  tion,  (6) Waste Minimization, and (7) Waste Management.
  Specifications: Also available from Supt. of Docs. Prepared
  in cooperation with IT Corp., Knoxville, TN. Sponsored by
  Environmental  Protection Agency,  Cincinnati,  OH. Risk Re-
  duction Engineering Lab., United Nations  Environment Pro-
  gramme,  Paris (France),  and  World Federation of Engineer-
  ing Organizations, Pasadena,  CA. 612p.
  Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials,  Pollution,
  Meetings.

1279  International Symposium on  Field Screening
  Methods for Hazardous Wastes and Toxic Chemicals
  (2nd), Proceedings. Held in Las Vegas, Nevada on
  February 12-14, 1991
  Order Number PB92-125764CDH, price: PC$98.00
  Department of Energy, Washington,  DC.; Environmental
  Monitoring Systems  Lab., Las  Vegas, NV.*Army Toxic and
  Hazardous Materials Agency, Aberdeen Proving Ground
  MD.* Department of  the Air Force, Washington, DC.*Florida
  State Univ., Tallahassee; Dec  91
  The document  presents the technical papers that were pre-
  sented  at the  Second  International Symposium on  Field
  Screening Methods  for Hazardous Wastes and Toxic Chemi-
  cals. Sixty platform presentations were made and included in
  one  of ten  sessions:  chemical  sensors; ion  mobility spec-
  trometry; robotics; QA and study design; air pathway monitor-
  ing at Superfund sites; field  mobile GC/MS techniques;  port-
  able gas chromatography; field screening methods for worker
  safety; x-ray fluorescence;  and,  Fourier transform  infrared
  spectrometry and other spectroscopy methods. In addition,
  sixty poster presentations were made and each  presenter
  submitted a four-page  extended abstract for inclusion in the
   proceedings. The poster  presentations  covered the same
   topics as those mentioned above and other topics such as
   immunoassay techniques,  sample  preparation  techniques,
   and case studies of technology application.
   Specifications:   See also  PB90-132572 and PB89-134159.
   Sponsored by Environmental Monitoring Systems  Lab.,  Las
   Vegas, NV.,  Army Toxic and Hazardous Materials Agency,
   Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD., Department of the Air Force,
   Washington, DC., and Florida State Univ., Tallahassee. 850p.
   Subject index  keywords: Hazardous  wastes, Meetings,
   Waste management, Site characterization, Chemical analysis,
   Environmental monitoring.

 1280  Issues Paper on Radiation Site Cleanup Regulations
   Order Number PB94-112349CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
   Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
   Air and Radiation; Sep 93
   EPA prepared the document to present issues,  approaches,
   and  preliminary analyses related to its development of radi-
   ation site  cleanup  regulations.  It  focuses exclusively  on
   issues  and approaches related to developing cleanup regula-
   tions; it does not address issues specific to waste manage-
   ment regulations,  which will  be addressed in a separate doc-
   ument.  The first three chapters discuss Significant  Issues,
   Regulatory Approaches,  and Summary and Next Steps. Ap-
   pendix  A presents  background information on  radioactive
   waste and provides additional details of EPA coordination of
   its rulemaking effort. Appendix B discusses  statutory authori-
  ties upon which EPA may base its  cleanup regulations. Ap-
  pendix  C is a copy of the EPA/NRG MOU. Appendix D dis-
  cusses  the issues raised in NRC's  Enhanced Participatory
   Rulemaking on Radiological Criteria for Decommissioning, in
  which EPA participated.  Appendix E is  a list of acronyms,
  and Appendix F is a glossary of terms used throughout the
  document.
  Specifications: 67p.
  Subject index keywords: Radioactive wastes, Risk assess-
  ment, Superfund.

1281  Literature Survey of Innovative Technologies for
  Hazardous Waste Site Remediation, 1987-1991
  Order Number PB93-105617CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Solid Waste and Emergency  Response; Jul 92
  EPA's Office of Solid  Waste and Emergency Response is
  seeking  to  further the use  of innovative hazardous  waste
  treatment technologies in its programs. In order to achieve
  more permanent  remedies, the Agency  is encouraging the
  use of  new or innovative technologies that are capable  of
  treating contaminated soils/sludges and ground water more
  effectively, less expensively,  and in a manner more accepta-
  ble to the public than existing  conventional methods. The
  bibliography is intended  to  increase the efficiency of the
  technology evaluation process. The  document is not meant
  to be comprehensive in scope nor is it meant to convey an
  endorsement of the citations.  It is meant to provide a survey
  of publications which could  be useful when  innovative tech-
  nologies are investigated. As a research aid,  the bibliography
  can help provide insights into current developments and pro-
  vide references which may serve as a basis for further inves-
  tigations.
  Specifications: Also available from Supt. of  Docs. 50p.
                                                                                                              243

-------
TECHNOLOGY POLICY & ADMINISTRATION:
Miscellaneous Policy & Program Documents
  Subject index  keywords: Hazardous materials,  Remedial
  action, Waste treatment, Soil treatment, Bibliographies, Inno-
  vative treatment technologies.
1282  Metals Testing Report: Metal Content of
  Environmental Samples from Region 4
  Order Number PB90-187105CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
  Corvallis Environmental  Research Lab., OR.; NSI Technology
  Services Corp., Corvallis, OR; Dec 89
  The report summarizes  the procedures used to analyze se-
  lected aquatic and emergent plant, aquatic insect, and fish
  samples for specific metals; and presents the results of the
  analyses along  with some interpretation. Samples were re-
  ceived from  Region 4,  Environmental  Services  Division,
  Athens,  Georgia, under an agreement in which the ERL-C
  Site Assessment Team would determine the metal content of
  the samples,  lead  being the primary metal of interest,  and
  forward  the results to  Region 4 to aid in the site assess-
  ments. Samples were collected from two Superfund sites in
  the southeast United States,  the  Kassouf-Kimerling site in
  Tampa,  FL, and the Schuylkill site in Plant City, FL.  Both
  were 'battery  cracking'  sites. The samples were acid digest-
  ed to reduce them  to inorganic constituents which were then
  analyzed with ICP-AES (inductively-coupled plasma-atomic
  emission spectroscopy). Metals  assessed  included calcium,
  magnesium,  sodium, potassium,  phosphorous, zinc,  alumi-
  num,  iron, manganese, copper, chromium,  nickel, arsenic,
  lead, boron, cobalt, and molybdenum.
  Specifications: Prepared in cooperation with NSI Technolo-
  gy Services Corp., Corvallis, OR. 16p.
  Subject Index keywords: Water pollution, Water chemistry,
  Metals, Ions, Quantitative analysis.
 1283  OSWER Source Book: Training and Technology
  Transfer Resources
  Order Number PB92-102169CDH, price: PC A13/MF A03
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Solid Waste and Emergency Response; May 91
  The "OSWER Source Book consolidates information on the
  numerous training  and  other technology transfer  resources
  sponsored by EPA's Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
  Response (OSWER) and others. The OSWER Source  Book
  provides descriptions of training courses, videos and publica-
  tions of interest to Federal and State personnel working  in
  solid  and hazardous  waste management.  The  OSWER
  Source Book should be especially useful to Federal person-
  nel working  in  programs  under authorities of the RCRA,
  CERCLA, SARA, or other similar Federal environmental man-
  agement and restoration programs.
  Specifications: 297p.
  Subject  index  keywords: Technology transfer,  Hazardous
  materials, Waste management, Superfund, Training, Office of
  Solid Waste and Emergency Response.
 1284  OSWER Source Book. Volume 1. Training and
  Technology Transfer Resources, 1992-1993
  Order Number PB93-143980CDH, price:  PC A10/MF A03
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Sep 92
  Volumes I and  II of The OSWER Source Book provide infor-
  mation  on the  many training courses, publications, video-
  tapes, and information systems and software available  to
  support EPA staff, State and local agencies, and others in-
  volved in managing the Nation's hazardous and solid waste
  programs. The Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Re-
  sponse's (OSWER) Technology Innovation Office (TIO) has
  compiled listings of the most significant training and technol-
  ogy transfer resources available to assist individuals with the
  responsibility for accomplishing OSWER's mission. Volume I
  of The Source Book contains listings of OSWER and other
  office training courses, publications, videotapes,  information
  systems  and  software,  and support programs devoted  to
  hazardous and solid waste issues.
  Specifications:   See  also  Volume 2,  PB93-144129 and
  PB92-102169. 206p.
  Subject  index keywords: Technology transfer,  Hazardous
  materials, Waste management, Superfund, Training,  Bibliog-
  raphies, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response.

1285  OSWER Source Book. Volume 2. Training and
  Technology Transfer Resources, 1992-1993
  Order Number PB93-144129CDH, price: PC A11/MF A03
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Sep 92
  Volumes I and II of The OSWER Source Book provide infor-
  mation  on the  many training  courses, publications, video-
  tapes, and  information  systems and software  available  to
  support EPA staff, State and local  agencies, and others  in-
  volved in managing the Nation's hazardous and  solid  waste
  programs. The  Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Re-
  sponse's (OSWER) Technology Innovation Office (TIO) has
  compiled listings of the most significant training and technol-
  ogy transfer resources available to assist individuals with the
  responsibility for accomplishing OSWER's mission. Volume II
  contains frequently  requested OSW publications, including
  those that address municipal solid waste and recycling. This
  second volume  of The Source Book is new for this edition,
  and provides much  additional  information compared to  the
  earlier version.
  Specifications: See also Volume 1, PB93-143980. 236p.
  Subject index  keywords: Technology transfer, Hazardous
  materials, Waste management, Superfund, Training, Bibliog-
  raphies,  Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response.

1286  Personnel Protection through Reconnaissance
  Robotics at Superfund Remedial Sites
  Order Number PB92-166743CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk
  Reduction Engineering Lab; c1992
  Investigation,  mitigation, arid clean-up of hazardous materials
  at Superfund sites normally require on-site workers  to per-
  form hazardous and sometimes potentially dangerous func-
  tions. Such  functions include site surveys and the reconnais-
  sance for airborne and buried toxic environmental contami-
  nants. Workers  conducting on-site air monitoring  risk dermal,
  ocular and inhalation exposure to hazardous chemicals, while
  those performing excavations also risk in  addition the  poten-
  tial exposure to fire, explosion, and other  physical  injury.
  EPA's current  efforts  to protect its workers and  mitigate
  these risks  include the  use of robotic devices. Using  robots
  offers the  ultimate in personnel protection by removing the
  worker from  the site of potential exposure.  The paper de-
  scribes the  demonstration of a commercially-available robotic
  platform modified and equipped for air monitoring  and the
  ongoing research for the development of a ground penetrat-
  ing radar  (GPR)  system to  detect  buried chemical  waste
  drums. These robotic devices can be ultimately routinely de-
 244

-------
                                                                      TECHNOLOGY POLICY & ADMINISTRATION:
                                                                      Miscellaneous Policy & Program Documents
   ployed  in the field for the  purpose of conducting inherently
   safe reconnaissance activities during Superfund/SARA reme-
   dial operations.
   Specifications:  Pub. in Jnl. of Air and Waste Management
   Association,  v42 n3 p341-345  Mar  92.  See  also  PB90-
   134164. 6p.
   Subject index keywords: Superfund,  Robotics, Occupation-
   al safety and health, Air pollution monitoring, Hazardous ma-
   terials.

 1287  Physical/Chemical Treatment of Hazardous Waste
   Sites: Speaker Slide Copies and Supporting Information
   Order Number PB91-145433CDH, price: PC A11/MF A02
   PEER Consultants, Inc., Dayton, OH.; Environmental
   Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Center for Environmental
   Research Information; Apr 90
   Contents: Process-Based Treatment Decision Making; Treat-
   ability Studies and Data Quality Objectives; Material Handling
   Including Debris Separation and Decontamination; Separa-
  tion of Inorganic  Contaminants from Soils and Sludges; Sep-
  aration  and Treatment of Inorganics in Aqueous Matrices-
  Separation  of Organic Contaminants from Soils and Sludges-
  Separation  and Treatment of Organics in Liquids; Collection
  and Treatment of Gases; Databases Supporting Technology
  Selections.
  Specifications:  Also available from Supt.  of Docs.  Spon-
  sored by Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH
  Center for Environmental Research Information. 243p.
  Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials,  Separation
  Waste treatment, Meetings.

1288  Pilot-Scale Incinerability Evaluation of Arsenic-and
  Lead-Contaminated Soils from Two Superfund Sites
  Order Number PB91-226308CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
  Acurex Corp., Jefferson, AR.; Environmental Protection
  Agency,  Cincinnati, OH. Risk Reduction Engineering Lab;
  199"!
  Two incineration test programs were conducted at EPA's In-
  cineration Research  Facility  to evaluate the  suitability  of in-
  cineration as an option to treat contaminated Superfund site
  soils. The soils from the Purity Oil Sales site  in Region 9 are
  contaminated with lead, up to several percent sulfur, and, to
  a lesser extent,  hazardous  organic constituents. The soil
  from the Baird and McGuire Superfund site in  Region 1  is
  contaminated  with  pesticides,  arsenic, and,  to a  lesser
  extent, lead. Incineration could  be considered applicable to
  the treatment of the three Purity Oil Sales site soils tested
  based on effective semivolatile organic decontamination, in-
  compliance  (with  federal  standards) paniculate  emissions,
  and  low  SO2/SO3 emissions. However, these tests results
  suggest that the resulting kiln ash would be a toxicity charac-
 teristic hazardous waste due to its  teachable lead content.
 Similarly, for the Baird and McGuire site soils, organic decon-
 tamination of the tested materials was effective. Between 36
 and  76  percent of the measured arsenic and between 69
 and 94 percent of the measured lead were discharged in the
 kiln bottom  ash depending  on kiln  temperature. The low
 TCLP teachability of the lead in the kiln bottom ash was not
 affected by the test variables kiln temperatures and kiln exit
 flue gas  O2. However, the ash  arsenic resulting from high
 excess air operation was  significantly less teachable  than
 that from low excess air operation, and was somewhat more
 teachable at  high temperature than at low temperature.
   Specifications: Proceedings of the Incineration Conference,
   Knoxville, TN., May 13-17,  1991. Sponsored by Environmen-
   tal Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk Reduction Engi-
   neering Lab. 12p.
   Subject index keywords: Waste  disposal, Soil contamina-
   tion, Incineration, Superfund, Air pollution control.

 1289  Pilot-Scale Incineration of Contaminated Sludges
   from the Bofors-Nobel Superfund Site
   Order Number PB93-141034CDH, price: PC A17/MF A03
   Acurex Environmental Corp., Jefferson, AR.; Environmental
   Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk Reduction
   Engineering Lab; Jan 93
   A detailed  test program was performed at the U.S. EPA In-
   cineration Research Facility to help determine the effective-
   ness  of incineration  in treating two  contaminated lagoon
   sludges from the Bofors-Nobel Superfund Site in Muskegon,
   Ml. The sludges tested were contaminated with various or-
   ganic contaminants  and trace metals.  Three incineration
   tests were conducted for each sludge, for a total of six tests,
   in the facility's rotary kiln incineration system.  Test results
   suggested that incineration  under the conditions tested  rep-
   resented an effective treatment option for both sludges.  Par-
  ticulate emissions at the scrubber exit were high during incin-
  eration of one of the sludges while cadmium and lead collec-
  tion efficiencies were low. This suggested the wet scrubber
  system may not be an appropriate choice  for  air  pollution
  control.
  Specifications:   Sponsored by Environmental Protection
  Agency,  Cincinnati,  OH. Risk  Reduction Engineering  Lab.
  378p.
  Subject  index keywords: Sludge,  Incinerators,  Pilot plants,
  Waste treatment, Incineration Research Facility, Superfund.

1290  Pilot-Scale Incineration of Contaminated Soil from
  the Purity Oil Sales and McColl Superfund Sites
  Order Number PB92-105857CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
  Acurex Corp., Jefferson, AR.; Environmental Protection
  Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk Reduction  Engineering Lab;
  Nov 91
  An incineration test program was conducted at the U.S. Envi-
  ronmental Protection Agency's Incineration Research Facility
  to evaluate the potential of incineration  as an option to treat
  contaminated soils at the Purity  Oil Sales Superfund site in
  Fresno, California, and the McColl Superfund site in Fuller-
  ton, California. The soils from these sites are  contaminated
  with up to several percent sulfur and with some hazardous
  organic contaminates. The Purity site has lead contamination
  from 760  to  10,200 mg/kg.  The tests were  conducted in a
  pilot-scale rotary kiln using a single stage ionizing wet scrub-
  ber for exhaust particulate control. Test results suggest that
  incineration would be an acceptable treatment option for the
  McColl site materials.
  Specifications:  See also PB88-239223 and PB89-148076.
  Sponsored by Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati,
  OH. Risk Reduction Engineering Lab. 74p.
 Subject index keywords: Soils, Incinerators,  Waste treat-
  ment, Hazardous materials.
                                                                                                               245

-------
TECHNOLOGY POLICY & ADMINISTRATION:
Miscellaneous Policy & Program Documents
1291  Pilot-Scale Incineration of PCB-Contaminated
  Sediments from the Hot Spot of the New Bedford
  Harbor Superfund Site
  Order Number PB92-227321CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
  Acurex Corp., Jefferson, AR. Incineration Research Facility.;
  Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk
  Reduction Engineering Lab; 1992
  Testing was performed at  the  EPA's Incineration Research
  Facility (IRF)  to determine  the  incinerability of contaminated
  marine sediment  from the Hot Spot in the New Bedford
  Harbor Superfund Site, the contaminants at this site were
  PCBs, at concentrations up to  > 200,000 mg/kb, and metals,
  chiefly cadmium, chromium, copper, and lead, at concentra-
  tions up to several hundred mg/kg. Sediments were inciner-
  ated without dewatering. Tests were run on sediments spiked
  with pure PCS transformer fluid and a brief period of oper-
  ation  with native  sediment alone,  or  unspiked. Test  results
  suggest that incineration would be an effective treatment
  option for the site sediments. However, sediment dewatering
  prior  to  incineration and/or incinerating  for a  longer kiln
  solids residence time might be  required to produce a treated
  sedijrient not contaminated by PCBs.
  Specifications:  Proceedings  of the 1992 Incineration Con-
  fererjce,  Alburquerque,  NM.,  May 11-14,  1992.  See  also
  PB92-178953.  Sponsored by  Environmental   Protection
  Agency,  Cincinnati, OH.  Risk Reduction Engineering  Lab.
  10p.
  Subject Index keywords:  Superfund, Sediments, Waste dis-
  posal, Incineration.
 1292  Pilot-Scale  Incineration of PCB-Contaminated
  Sediments from the New Bedford Harbor Hot Spot
  Superfund Site
  Order Number PB92-178953CDH, price: PC A09/MF A03
  Acurex Corp., Jefferson, AR. Incineration Research Facility.;
  Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk
  Reduction Engineering Lab; Apr 92
  Testing was  performed at the EPA's Incineration Research
  Facility (IRF) to determine the incinerability of contaminated
  marine  sediment from the Hot Spot in  the  New  Bedford
  Harbor Superfund Site.  The contaminants at the site were
  PCBs, at concentrations up to <200,000 mg/kg, and  metals,
  chiefly cadmium,  chromium, copper, and lead, at  concentra-
  tions up  to several hundred mg/kg. Sediments were  inciner-
  ated without dewatering. Tests were run on sediments spiked
  with pure PCS transformer fluid and  a brief period of oper-
  ation with native sediment alone,  or  unspiked. Kiln exit gas
  temperature was varied from  824 to 984C (1515  to 1803F).
  Greater than 99.9999% Destruction and Removal Efficiency
  was^ achieved at  both kiln temperatures with the afterburner
  operated  at  1200C (2206F),  but  the treated sediment was
  still PCB-contaminated. The kiln ash accounted for about  80
  to  90% of the discharged amount of copper and chromium
  at  both kiln temperatures. Kiln ash discharge accounted  for
  53% (low kiln temperature) and 20% (high kiln temperature)
  of  the lead and  61% (low kiln temperature) and 10 to 20%
  (high kiln temperature) of the cadmium. Test results suggest
  that incineration would be an  effective treatment option  for
  the site sediments. However, sediment dewatering prior to in-
  cineration and/or incinerating for a  longer kiln solids resi-
  dence time might be  required to produce a treated sediment
  not contaminated by PCBs.
  Specifications:  See also PB84-128677,  PB87-120291 and
  PB91-120006.  Sponsored   by  Environmental   Protection
  Agency, Cincinnati,  OH. Risk Reduction Engineering  Lab.
  194p.
  Subject index keywords: Waste disposal, Incineration, Haz-
  ardous materials, Superfund, Sediments.

1293  Potential for Joint Research between EPA and the
  U.S. Army
  Order Number PB93-149227CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk
  Reduction Engineering Lab; 1992
  The environmental problems being faced by the US Environ-
  mental Protection Agency (EPA) and the US Army are close-
  ly related, and the  research needed  to address them  over-
  laps in many areas. The paper presents an overview of the
  hazardous waste site remediation research programs being
  conducted by EPA's Risk Reduction  Engineering  Laboratory
  (RREL) and proposes a number of areas where joint efforts
  between the two agencies could be mutually beneficial. EPA
  has established a policy of encouraging the use of innovative
  technologies that both reduce the quantity of contaminant to
  be handled and also destroy harmful contaminants.  Several
  technologies,  including  soil washing, soil vapor  extraction,
  thermal desorption, solvent extraction and soil flushing are of
  special interest. The RREL has established capabilities for
  treatability  studies  and other research  endeavors  at  a
  number of its locations.  EPA also continues to foster the use
  of innovative technologies  through its Superfund Innovative
  Technology Evaluation (SITE) program. In addition, EPA has
  established a technology transfer  program available to other
  agencies involving  both manuals/documents  and  training
  personnel. The authors welcome future  contacts by  Army
  personnel interested in sharing environmental projects.
  Specifications:  See also  PB90-182486, PB90-249772 and
  PB92-166859.  Presented at the 1992  U.S. Army Annual  R
  and D Symposium,  Williamsburg, VA., June 1992. 26p.
  Subject  index keywords: Hazardous materials, Remedial
  action, Research,  Waste management, Technology transfer.

 1294  Resources Conservation Company B.E.S.T. (Trade
  Name) Solvent Extraction Technology: Application
  Analysis Report
  Order Number PB94-105434CDH, price: PC A04/MF  A01
  Science Applications International Corp., Cincinnati, OH.;
  Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH.  Risk
  Reduction Engineering Lab; Jun 93
  The report summarizes the findings  of an evaluation of the
  Basic Extractive Sludge Treatment (B.E.S.T.) solvent extrac-
  tion technology developed  by Resources  Conservation Com-
  pany (RCC).  During the demonstration  test, the  B.E.S.T.
  system was used  to treat composited sediments from two
  areas of the  Grand Calumet River. Contaminant concentra-
  tion  reductions of  96 percent for total polynuclear aromatic
  hydrocarbons  (PAHs) and  greater than 99 percent  for total
  polychlorinated biphenyls  (PCBs) were  achieved for Sedi-
  ment  A. Contaminant  concentration reductions of greater
  than  99 percent for total PAHs and  greater  than 99 percent
  for total  PCBs were achieved for Sediment B. Removal effi-
  ciencies  in excess of 98 percent were realized for both sedi-
  ments for oil and grease (O&G).
 246

-------
                                                                     TECHNOLOGY POLICY & ADMINISTRATION:
                                                                     Miscellaneous Policy & Program Documents
   Specifications:   Sponsored  by Environmental Protection
   Agency, Cincinnati,  OH. Risk Reduction  Engineering Lab.
   o9p.

   Subject index keywords:  Solvent extraction, Sludge treat-
   ment, Hazardous materials.

 1295  Retech, Inc.,  Plasma Centrifugal Furnace:
   Applications Analysis Report
   Order Number PB92-218791CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
   Science Applications International Corp., San Diego, CA.;
   Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk
   Reduction Engineering Lab;  Jun 92
   The document is an evaluation of the performance of the
   Retech  Inc.  Plasma Centrifugal Furnace (PCF) and its appli-
   cability as a treatment technique  for soils contaminated with
   organic  and/or inorganic compounds. Both the technical and
   economic aspects of the technology were examined. A dem-
   onstration of the Retech furnace was conducted under the
   Superfund Innovative Technology Evaluation Program at the
   Department  of  Energy's Component Development and  Inte-
   gration  Facility in  Butte, Montana.  Operational data, along
   with sampling  and  analysis  information, were carefully com-
   piled to  establish a data base against which other available
   data, as well as the vendor's claims for the technology, have
   been compared and evaluated. Conclusions concerning the
  technology's suitability for use  in immobilizing  contaminants
  in the feed soil were reached,  and  extrapolations regarding
  applications  at  other sites with different contaminants and
  soil types were made.
  Specifications:  See also PB92-216035 and PB92-216043.
  Sponsored by  Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati
  OH. Risk Reduction Engineering Lab. 52p.
  Subject  index keywords:  Plasma  furnaces, Incinerators,
  Waste disposal, Hazardous materials, Combustion efficiency
  Technology utilization.

1296  Risk Reduction Engineering Laboratory Site
  Remediation Technical Support Program: FY92 Annual
  Report
  Order Number PB93-217651CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
  Science Applications International Corp., Cincinnati, OH.;
  Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk
  Reduction Engineering Lab; Mar 93
  The Risk Reduction  Engineering Laboratory is responsible for
  planning,  implementing, and managing  research, develop-
  ment, and demonstration programs to provide an authorita-
  tive, defensible engineering basis in  support of the policies
  programs, and regulations of the EPA with respect to drink-
  ing water, wastewater, pesticides, toxic substances, solid and
  hazardous wastes, and Superfund-related activities. The pub-
  lication is one of the products of that research and provides
  a vital communication link between the researcher and  the
  user community. The report  summarizes the activities and
  accomplishments of the Laboratory  in providing technical
  support to EPA  Regional Offices and others on contaminated
  soil site remediation  engineering problems.
  Specifications:   Sponsored by Environmental  Protection
 Agency,  Cincinnati,  OH.  Risk Reduction  Engineering Lab.
  19p.
 Subject index  keywords: US  EPA, Hazardous  materials
 Test facilities,  Risk Reduction  Engineering Laboratory.
  1297  Rotating Biological Contactors. Engineering Bulletin
   Order Number PB92-235936CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
   Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
   Emergency and Remedial Response; Oct 92
   Rotating biological contactors employ aerobic fixed-film treat-
   ment to degrade either  organic and/or  nitrogenous (ammo-
   nia-nitrogen) constituents present in aqueous waste streams.
   Fixed-film  systems  provide a surface to which the biomass
   can adhere. Treatment is achieved as the waste passes by
   the media, enabling fixed-film systems to acclimate biomass
   capable of degrading organic waste. Fixed-film rotating bio-
   logical contactor reactors provide a surface to which soil or-
   ganisms can adhere; many indigenous soil organisms are ef-
   fective degraders of hazardous wastes. The bulletin provides
   information on the technology  applicability,  the technology
   limitations, a description  of the  technology, the types of re-
   siduals produced, site  requirements, the latest performance
   data, the status  of the  technology, and sources of further in-
   formation.
   Specifications:  See also PB87-146296.  10p.
   Subject index keywords: Biological treatment, Superfund,
   Waste treatment, Liquid  wastes, Rotating biological contac-
   tors.

 1298  Selection of Control Technologies for  Remediation
   of Lead Battery Recycling Sites. (Engineering Bulletin)
   Order Number PB93-121333CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
   Foster Wheeler Enviresponse, Inc., Edison, NJ.;
   Environmental Protection  Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk
   Reduction Engineering Lab; Sep  92
   The objective of this bulletin is to provide remedial project
   managers  (RPMs),  potentially  responsible parties  (PRPs),
   and their supporting contractors with information to facilitate
   the selection of  treatment alternatives and cleanup services
   at lead battery  recycling sites  (LBRS).  This bulletin  con-
   denses  and updates the  information presented in  the  EPA
   technical resource document (TRD) entitled, 'Selection of
   Control Technologies for Remediation of Lead Battery Recy-
   cling Sites,' PB92-114537, July  1991. This bulletin  consoli-
   dates useful information on LBRS, such as the following: de-
   scription  of types of operations  commonly conducted, and
  wastes generated at LBRS; technologies implemented or se-
   lected for LBRS remediation; case studies of treatability stud-
  ies on LBRS wastes; past experience regarding the recycla-
  bility of materials that are  found at LBRS; and profiles of po-
  tentially applicable innovative treatment technologies.
  Specifications: See also PB92-114537. Sponsored by Envi-
  ronmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk Reduction
  Engineering Lab.  20p.
  Subject  index  keywords:  Superfund,  Remedial  action,
  Waste management,  Lead acid batteries, Waste treatment.

1299  SITE Demonstration of the American Combustion
  Pyretron Oxygen-Enhanced Burner
  Order Number PB91-196246CDH,  price: PC A02/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency,  Cincinnati, OH. Risk
  Reduction Engineering Lab; c1989
  A demonstration of the American  Combustion  Pyretron (TM)
  oxygen-enhanced burner was conducted  under the Super-
  fund Innovative Technology  Evaluation (SITE)  program.  The
  Demonstration was conducted at the U.S. EPA's Combustion
  Research Facility (CRF) in  Jefferson, Arkansas. An eight
  week test series  was conducted  which involved burning a
                                                                                                              247

-------
TECHNOLOGY POLICY & ADMINISTRATION:
Miscellaneous Policy & Program Documents
  mixture of listed waste K087 with contaminated soil from the
  Stringfellow Acid Pits under both oxygen enhancement and
  air-only conditions. Performance under both modes of oper-
  ation was compared. Results show that the Pyretron operat-
  ing with oxygen enhancement could meet RCRA  emissions
  (imitations at a throughput rate  double that for air-only oper-
  ation. Scrubber liquor and kiln ash from the tests  contained
  no detectable  levels  of contaminants from  either waste
  stream. (Copyright (c) 1989 Air and Waste Management As-
  sociation.)
  Specifications:  Pub. in Jnl. of the Air and Waste Manage-
  ment Association, v39 n2 p149-153 Feb 89. 7p.
  Subject  index keywords: Incinerators, Air pollution abate-
  ment, Waste disposal, Air pollution control equipment, Super-
  fund  Innovative Technology Evaluation  Program, Pyretron
  burners.
 1300  SITE Demonstration of the Basic Extractive Sludge
  Treatment Process
  Order Number PB94-101805CDH, price: PC A02/MF  A01
  Science Applications International Corp., Cincinnati, OH.;
  Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk
  Reduction Engineering Lab; c1993
  The Superfund Innovative Technology Evaluation (SITE) Pro-
  gram planned and executed a pilot-scale evaluation of the
  B.E.S.T.  process on sediment samples obtained from  the
  Grand Calumet River. Two separate sampling locations were
  selected based upon previous data. One location had sedi-
  ments with total  polychlorinated biphenyl (PCB)  concentra-
  tions averaging 10 mg/kg, and total polynuclear aromatic hy-
  drocarbon (PAH) concentrations averaging 520 mg/kg. The
  other location  had sediments with average  total PCB and
  PAH concentrations of 427 mg/kg and 72,000  mg/kg  re-
   spectively. Results showed that, of the samples  which had
   low original contamination concentrations, 96% of the PAHs
   and 99%  of the  PCBs were  removed following  seven se-
   quential  extractions. Treated samples which had high original
   contaminant concentrations were found to have removal effi-
   ciencies of 99%  for  both  PAHs and PCBs. (Copyright  (c)
   1993 Air & Waste Management Association.)
   Specifications:  P=ub. in Jnl. of Air and Waste Management
   Association,  v43  n9 p1274-1279 Sep  93. See also PB93-
   131795.  Sponsored by Environmental  Protection  Agency,
   Cincinnati, OH. Risk Reduction Engineering Lab. 8p.
   Subject index keywords: Superfund,  Water pollution con-
   trol, Sludge treatment.
 1301  SITE Demonstration of the CF Systems Organics
   Extraction System
   Order Number PB91-145110CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
   Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati,  OH.  Risk
   Reduction Engineering Lab.; Science Applications
   International Corp., McLean, VA.**Vermont Agency of
   Natural  Resources, Waterbury; c1990
   The CF Systems  Organic Extraction System was  used to
   remove PCBs from contaminated sediment dredged from the
   New Bedford Harbor. This work was done as part  of a field
   demonstration under the Superfund Innovative  Technology
   Evaluation (SITE) program. The purpose of the SITE program
   is to provide an independent  and objective evaluation of in-
   novative processes. The purpose of this paper is to present
   the results of the SITE demonstration of this technology.  Re-
   sults of the demonstration tests show that the system, which
   uses high pressure liquefied propane,  successfully removed
 PCBs from contaminated sediments in New Bedford Harbor.
 Removal efficiencies for all test runs exceeded 70%. Some
 operational  problems   occured  during  the  demonstration
 which  may  have  affected the efficiency with which PCBs
 were removed from the dredged sediment. Large amounts of
 residues were generated from the demonstration. Costs for
 using this process are estimated  to be  between $150/ton
 and $450/ton. (Copyright (c) 1990-Air & Waste Management
 Association.)
 Specifications:  Pub.  in Jnl. of Air and Waste Management
 Association, v40 n6 p926-931 Jun 90. Prepared in coopera-
 tion with Science Applications International  Corp., McLean,
 VA., and Vermont Agency of Natural Resources, Waterbury.
 8p.
 Subject index  keywords:  Superfund,  Waste  treatment,
 Dredge spoil, Water pollution control, Solvent extraction, Pol-
 ychlorinated biphenyls.
1302  Site Emerging Technologies: Bioscrubber for
 Removing Hazardous Organic Emissions from Soil,
 Water and Air Decontamination Processes
 Order Number PB93-227205CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
 Aluminum Co. of America, Pittsburgh, PA.; Environmental
  Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk Reduction
  Engineering Lab; Aug  93
  An engineered biofilter was developed to digest hazardous
  organic  emissions from soil, water and air  decontamination
  processes.  A bench   scale unit  was tested for over 11
  months  for the removal of low levels of toluene in air under
  the SITE  Emerging Technology Program. The  bioscrubber
  contains a selected activated carbon medium to support mi-
  crobial growth. The bioscrubber was designed for large vol-
  umes of  air streams containing trace volatile organics.
  Almost complete removal of hazardous organics was demon-
  strated. Comparing with other biofilters  using  compost or
  other naturally occurred media, the  use  of  activated carbon
  in the bioscrubber enhanced the degradation efficiency sub-
  stantially for the test performed.
  Specifications:   Sponsored  by Environmental Protection
  Agency,  Cincinnati,  OH. Risk  Reduction  Engineering Lab.
  70p.
  Subject index keywords:  Filtration, Microorganisms, Scrub-
  bers, Air pollution control.
 1303  SITE Emerging  Technologies Project: Babcock and
  Wilcox Cyclone Vitrification
  Order Number PB93-163038CDH, price: PC  A07/MF A02
  Babcock and Wilcox Co., Alliance, OH. Contract Research
  Div.; Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk
  Reduction Engineering Lab; Mar 93
  The Babcock and Wilcox 6 million  Btu/hr  pilot cyclone fur-
  nace was successfully used in a 2-year SITE Emerging  Tech-
  nology  project  to melt and vitrify  and  EPA Synthetic Soil
  Matrix (SSM) spiked  with 7,000 ppm lead, 1,000 ppm cadmi-
  um, and 1,500  ppm  chromium. An  advantage  of vitrification
  over other thermal treatment technologies is that in addition
  to destruction of organic wastes, the resulting vitrified prod-
   uct captures and does not leach non-volatile heavy metals.
   Indeed, when operated at  50 to 150 Ib/hr  of dry SSM feed,
   and from 100-300 Ib/hr of wet SSM feed, the cyclone tech-
   nology was  able to  produce  a  non-leachable  product (as
   measured by TCLP)  from the hazardous soil. From 95 to 97
   percent of the dry,  input SSM was incorporated within the
  248

-------
                                                                      TECHNOLOGY POLICY & ADMINISTRATION:
                                                                      Miscellaneous Policy & Program Documents
   slag.  Stable cyclone operation was achieved during the 2-
   year project which processed over 6 tons of clean, unspiked
   SSM  and 5 tons of spiked SSM.  During the thermal vitrifica-
   tion process, the  heavy metals in the slag was found to in-
   crease with  increasing  feed  rate  and with decreasing metal
   volatility. The treatment of the synthetic soil  matrix resulted
   in a volume reduction of 25-35 percent (dry basis)  Vitrifica-
   tion results in an easily-crushed, glassy product.
   Specifications:  See also PB90-172545,  PB91-120006 and
   PB93-145621.   Sponsored   by   Environmental   Protection
   Agency,  Cincinnati, OH.  Risk Reduction Engineering  Lab.
   loTp.
   Subject  index keywords:  Waste  treatment, Vitrification
   Hazardous materials, Remedial action, Heat  treatment Su-
   perfund Innovative Technology Evaluation Program, Innova-
   tive treatment technologies.

 1304  Small Systems Meet Superfund Challenge with
   Pomt-of-Entry Treatment Units
   Order Number PB93-141109CDH,  price: PC A02/MF A01
   Environmental Protection Agency,  Cincinnati, OH. Risk
   */,? **nl°n En9'neering Lab.; NSF International, Ann Arbor,
   Ml.  PSARA Technologies, Inc., Cincinnati, OH; Dec 91
   Several small systems and individual homeowners have been
   faced  with the task of  treating their groundwater that has
   been  contaminated with various organic  contaminants. Con-
   tamination is such that the locations described in this presen-
   tation  have been designated Federal Superfund sites under-
   going  emergency or remedial actions. These sites have uti-
   lized  pomt-of-entry water treatment  devices  to  treat their
   groundwater.  The  devices used  include:  single  and dual
   granular activated  carbon (GAG)  columns; air stripping in
   series  with GAG; and ozone/UV followed by GAG. Cost (cap-
   ital and operating) contaminant removal  performance  GAG
   breakthrough  and  disinfection byproduct formation  will be
   discussed for several Superfund or state led cleanup actions.
   Specifications:  Proceedings of  the Hazardous  Materials
  Control/Superfund  Conference, Washington, DC., December
  3-5 1991. See also  PB89-195010. Prepared in cooperation
  with NSF International, Ann Arbor,  Ml., and PSARA Technol-
  ogies, Inc., Cincinnati, OH. 9p.
  Subject index keywords: Superfund, Water treatment, Pota-
  ble water, Waste disposal, Hazardous materials, Small sys-
  tems, Point of entry treatment.

1305  Solvent Extraction  Processes: A Survey of Systems
  in the SITE Program
  Order Number PB93-131795CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk
  Reduction Engineering Lab.; Science Applications
  International Corp., Cincinnati, OH; c1992
  Solvent extraction of contaminated soils,  sludges and sedi-
  ments has been successfully completed at a number of Su-
  perfund sites.  Each  commercialized process uses a unique
  operating  system to  extract   organic contaminants  from
  solids.   These  operating systems may' be classified by the
  properties  of the solvents each utilizes:  (1) standard  sol-
  vents,  (2) near-critical fluids/liquified  gases, and (3) critical
  solution temperature solvents. The  paper discusses  pretreat-
  ment and posttreatment requirements, and discusses the op-
  erating  systems of the solvent  extraction system currently in
  the Superfund Innovative  Technology Evaluation (SITE) Pro-
  gram. Future demonstrations of these technologies by the
  U.S. EPA's Superfund Innovative Technology Evaluation Pro-
   gram will provide additional information regarding the efficacy
   of these processes. Copyright (c)  1992 Air and Waste Man-
   agement Association).
   Specifications:  Pub. in Jnl. of the Air and Waste Manage-
   ment Association, v42 n8 p1118-1121 Aug 92. Prepared in
   cooperation with  Science Applications International  Corp.,
   Cincinnati, OH. 7p.
   Subject  index keywords: Solvent  extraction,  Superfund,
   Soil treatment, Waste treatment, Organic compounds.

 1306   Solvent Extraction Treatment
   Order Number PB91-228015CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
   Science Applications International Corp., Cincinnati, OH.;
   Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
   Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 90
   Solvent extraction does not destroy wastes, but is  a means
   of separating hazardous  contaminants from soils, sludges,
   and sediments, thereby reducing the volume of the hazard-
   pus waste that must be treated. Generally it is used as one
   in a  series of  unit operations,  and can reduce the overall
   cost for managing a particular site. It is applicable to organic
   wastes and is generally not used for treating inorganics and
   metals. The technology uses an organic chemical as a sol-
   vent  and differs  from soil washing,  which generally  uses
   water or water with wash improving additives. During  1989,
   the technology was one of the selected remedies at six Su-
   perfund sites. Commercial-scale units are in operation. There
   is  no clear solvent extraction technology leader by  virtue of
   the solvent  employed,  type of equipment used, or mode of
   operation. The final determination of the lowest cost alterna-
   tive will be more site specific than process equipment domi-
   nated. Vendors should be contacted to determine the  avail-
   ability of a unit for a particular site. The bulletin provides in-
   formation on the technology applicability, the types of residu-
   als produced, the latest performance data, site requirements,
   the status of the technology, and  sources for further informa-
  tion.
  Specifications:   Sponsored  by  Environmental  Protection
  Agency, Washington, DC. Office of Emergency and Remedial
  Response. 10p.
  Subject  index  keywords: Solvent extraction,  Hazardous
  materials, Waste treatment, Materials recovery, Organic com-
  pounds.

1307  Summary of GIS Support to Superfund
  Order Number PB93-963506CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency,  Washington, DC. Office of
  Solid Waste and Emergency Response;  Jun  93
  The document describes four Superfund-related projects in-
  volving the development of Geographic Information  System
  applications.  It identifies the role of GIS  technology within the
  overall Superfund process and discusses the components of
  GIS and integration with the Superfund process.
  Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
  posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
  and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies  also available in
 paper copy or microfiche. 62p.
 Subject index keywords: Superfund,  Geographic informa-
 tion systems, Site surveys.
                                                                                                               249

-------
TECHNOLOGY POLICY & ADMINISTRATION:
Miscellaneous Policy & Program Documents
1308  Superfund Engineering Issue: Issues Affecting the
  Applicability and Success of Remedial/Removal
  Incineration Projects
  Order Number PB92-109081CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
  PEI Associates, Inc., Cincinnati, OH.; Environmental
  Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of Emergency
  and Remedial Response; Feb 91
  Incineration has been a recommended method for disposing
  of hazardous materials, and its use in the Superfund Program
  is increasing rapidiyi It has  become one of the most often
  selected  methods for treating  hazardous constituents  found
  at Superfund sites. Because of the increased reliance of Su-
  perfund decision  makers on  incineration, the Engineering
  Forum has identified the informed  evaluation of incineration
  as a remedy, and the issues inherent in its implementation
  as a high priority. The paper was prepared by RREL's Engi-
  neering and Treatment Technical Support Center, under the
  technical direction of Laurel Staley (RREL) and Paul Leonard
  {Region  III), with the  support of the Superfund Technical
  Support Project.
  Specifications;   Sponsored  by Environmental  Protection
  Agency, Washington, DC. Office of Emergency and Remedial
  Response. 30p.
  Subject index keywords: Superfund,  Remedial action, Haz-
  ardous, materials, Waste disposal, Incineration.

 1309  Superfund Innovative Technology Evaluation
  Program: Annual Report to Congress 1992
  Order Number PB94-123874CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk
  Reduction Engineering Lab; Oct 93
  The SITE Program was  created to  meet the  increased
  demand  for alternative hazardous waste treatment technol-
  ogies and was the first major program for demonstrating and
  evaluating  full-scale, innovative treatment  technologies at
  hazardous waste sites. The report discusses the Program's
  progress and accomplishments over the past fiscal year, out-
  lines the Program's impact, and catalogues current projects
  being  undertaken.
  Specifications:  See also PB93-126613. 56p.
  Subject index  keywords: Superfund,  Demonstration  pro-
   grams, SITE(Superfund Innovative Technology Evaluation).

 1310  Superfund Innovative Technology Evaluation
   Program Demonstration Plan for Westinghouse Bio-
   Analytic Systems Pentachlorophenol Immunoassays
   Order Number PB92-170190CDH, price:  PC A08/MF A02
   Lockheed Engineering and Sciences Co., Inc., Las Vegas,
   NV.; Environmental Monitoring Systems Lab., Las Vegas,
   NV.* Environmental Protection Agency, Las Vegas, NV; 14
   Apr 92
   The plan provides  a detailed design  and description of the
   demonstration and evaluation program for the Westinghouse
   Bio-Analytic Systems immunoassay technologies specific for
   the analysis of pentachlorophenol. The immunoassays meas-
   ure parts per billion concentrations of pentachlorophenol in
   water. The demonstration is being conducted under the Su-
   perfund Innovative Technology Evaluation (SITE) Program. It
   is expected that proper execution of the demonstration plan
   will provide information  that enables data users  and  review-
   ers to assess the performance of the technology in terms of
   its usefulness and limitations for the Superfund Program. The
   main  focus of the demonstration is to evaluate on site a se-
   miquantitative immunoassay field analysis kit for its utility as
 a  rapid field screening tool. The results obtained from the
 field kit analyses will be compared to those obtained from a
 quantitative  high-sample-capacity plate  immunoassay  also
 developed by Westinghouse  Bio-Analytic Systems. In  addi-
 tion, both immunoassay techniques will be compared to the
 standard gas chromatography/mass spectrometry procedure
 for pentachlorophenol determination. The quality assurance
 plan for the demonstration is provided in an appendix.
 Specifications:  Prepared in cooperation with Environmental
 Monitoring Systems Lab., Las Vegas, NV. Sponsored by En-
 vironmental Protection Agency, Las Vegas, NV. 157p.
 Subject index  keywords: Superfund,  Pentachlorophenol,
 Immunoassay,  Westinghouse, Chemical water pollutants, Su-
 perfund Innovative Technology Evaluation Program(SITE).

1311  Superfund Innovative Technology Evaluation
 Program: Progress and Accomplishments, Fiscal Year
  1989. A Third Report to Congress
 Order  Number PB90-216516CDH, price: PC A05/MF A01
 Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
 Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Mar 90
 This is the third Report to  Congress on the Superfund  Inno-
 vative  Technology Evaluation  (SITE) Program. The report
 summarizes the progress,  accomplishments, and  results of
 the SITE Program through 1989. Field demonstrations for
  eight projects  have been completed since publication of the
  first report. The second Report  to Congress focuses on the
  completed demonstrations and provides performance  data
  and results. The process used to assess the economic  feasi-
  bility of each  demonstration  is  presented.  The report de-
  scribes the progress  of the  components that were initiated
  during the first year of the  program and the two components
  implemented during  the past year. Another difference be-
  tween the two  reports is that the second Report to Congress
  identifies the   impediments encountered during the first 3
  years  of the  program and describes the  refinements that
  EPA has implemented to  address these problems and im-
  prove the effectiveness of the SITE Program.
  Specifications: See also PB89-215214. 83p.
  Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste treat-
  ment, Superfund Innovative Technology Evaluation Program,
  Waste management, Remedial action.

 1312 Superfund Innovative Technology Evaluation
  Program: Progress and Accomplishments, Fiscal Year
  1990. A Fourth Report to Congress
  Order Number PB92-224799CDH, price: PC A05/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 91
  The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) established
  the Superfund Innovative Technology Evaluation (SITE) Pro-
  gram  in  1986, following passage of  the Superfund Amend-
  ments  and Reauthorization Act  (SARA).  The  Program's
  progress and accomplishments for Fiscal Year 1990 are pre-
  sented in four sections in this Fourth  Report  to Congress.
  Section 1 presents an overview of the SITE Program includ-
  ing the statutory authority and history of the program and the
  four program  components and goals.  Section 2  discusses
  the use of innovative alternative technologies for hazardous
  waste site  remediation and  the impact the  SITE  Program is
  having on their increased use. Section 3 presents the SITE
   Program's progress and accomplishments over the past year
  and specific goals for the coming year. Section 4 proposes
  250

-------
   various   program  changes   and  recommends  statutory
   changes  that can enhance SITE'S ability to meet its overall
   objectives. Several examples  of program  products are ap-
   pended to this report to highlight the technology transfer as-
   pects of the SITE Program.
   Specifications: See also PB90-216516.  86p.
   Subject  index  keywords: Hazardous materials, Remedial
   action, Technology innovation, Waste treatment, Superfund
   Innovative Technology Evaluation Program, Innovative treat-
   ment technologies.

 1313  Superfund Innovative Technology Evaluation
   Program: Progress and Accomplishments Fiscal Year
   1991. A 5th Report to Congress
   Order Number PB93-126613CDH, price: PC A05/MF A01
   Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk
   Reduction Engineering Lab; Oct 92
   The Superfund Innovative Technology Evaluation (SITE) pro-
   gram was the first major program for  demonstrating and
   evaluating full-scale  innovative treatment  technologies at
   hazardous waste sites. Having concluded its fifth year, the
   SITE program is recognized as a leading advocate of innova-
   tive technology development and commercialization for haz-
   ardous waste treatment and remediation.  In  addition, through
   the demonstration of innovative monitoring and measurement
   technologies,  EPA is  promoting faster, more cost-effective
   site  characterization and  post-cleanup monitoring methods
  for Superfund and Resource Conservation and Recovery Act
   (RCRA) corrective action sites. The fifth report to Congress
  documents the impact of the SITE program  through discuss-
  ing the program's progress and accomplishments over the
  past year.  The report also sets goals for the coming years
  and  makes specific recommendations on  achieving  these
  goals.
  Specifications: See also PB92-224799. 82p.
  Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste treat-
  ment, Remedial  action, Innovative  treatment technologies
  Superfund  Innovative Technology Evaluation  Program.

1314  Superfund Innovative Technology Evaluation
  Program: Spring Update to the Technology Profiles
  Fourth Edition
  Order Number PB92-233121CDH, price:  PC A03/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Emergency and Remedial Response; Apr 92
  The SITE  Program promotes the development  and  imple-
  mentation  of  innovative treatment technologies  that  (1)
  reduce the toxicity, mobility, or volume of hazardous waste,
  and (2) monitor the nature and extent  of hazardous waste
  site contamination. To accomplish these tasks, the SITE Pro-
  gram consists  of four interrelated  programs: Demonstration
  Program; Emerging Technology  Program; Monitoring  and
  Measurement Technologies Program; and Technology Trans-
  fer  Program.
 Specifications: See also;PB92-224294. 22p.
 Subject index  keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste treat-
 ment, Superfund.
           TECHNOLOGY POLICY & ADMINISTRATION:
           Miscellaneous Policy & Program Documents


 1315  Superfund Innovative Technology Evaluation
   Program: Technology Profiles, Fifth Edition
   Order Number PB93-163053CDH, price: PC A18/MF A04
   Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk
   Reduction Engineering Lab; Nov 92
   The Superfund Innovative Technology Evaluation (SITE) Pro-
   gram evaluates new  and promising treatment technologies
   for cleanup of hazardous waste sites. The program was cre-
   ated to encourage the development and routine use of inno-
   vative treatment technologies.  The document, prepared  be-
   tween June and October, 1992, is intended as a guide for
   decisionmakers and others interested in technologies in  the
   SITE Demonstration, Emerging Technology, and Monitoring
   and Measurement Technologies Programs. Reference tables
   of SITE Program participants precede the individual profiles
   and contain EPA and developer contacts. Inquiries about a
   specific SITE technology or the SITE Program should be di-
   rected to an EPA Project Manager. The two-page profiles are
   presented by name of the developer in alphabetical  order.
   Each profile contains (1)  a technology developer and proc-
   ess name, (2) a technology description, (3) a discussion of
   waste  applicability,  (4)  a project  status report, (5)  EPA
   Project Manager and developer contacts, and (6) a schemat-
   ic diagram or photograph of the process.  The profiles also
   include summaries of demonstration results if available. New
  features of this edition include  a Table of Media Applicability
  and a complete Index organized by Waste Media and Con-
  taminant.
  Specifications:  See also PB92-224294. 413p.
  Subject index  keywords: Hazardous  materials, Remedial
  action,  Waste treatment,  Superfund Innovative Technology
  Evaluation Program, Innovative  treatment technologies.

1316  Superfund Innovative Technology Evaluation
  Program: Technology Profiles, Fourth Edition
  Order Number PB92-224294CDH, price: PC A14/MF A03
  Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk
  Reduction Engineering Lab; Nov 91
  The Superfund Innovative Technology Evaluation (SITE) Pro-
  gram, now in its sixth year, is an integral part of EPA's re-
  search into alternative cleanup methods for hazardous waste
  sites  around the nation.  Under the SITE Program,  EPA
 enters into cooperative agreements with  innovative technolo-
 gy developers. The document profiles  129 demonstration,
 emerging, and  monitoring and  measurement technologies
 being evaluated  under  the SITE Program. Each technology
 profile contains a description of the technology, a discussion
 of its applicability to various wastes,  an update on its devel-
 opment or demonstration status, any  available demonstration
 results,  and demonstration and technology contacts.  This
 document is intended for environmental decision makers and
 other interested individuals involved in hazardous waste site
 cleanup.
 Specifications: See also PB90-249756. 216p.
 Subject index keywords:  Waste management,  Technology
 innovation, Remedial action, Superfund Innovative Technolo-
 gy Evaluation Program, Cleanup  operations.
                                                                                                             251

-------
TECHNOLOGY POLICY & ADMINISTRATION:
Miscellaneous Policy & Program Documents
1317  Superfund Innovative Technology Evaluation
  Program: Technology Profiles, November 1989
  Ordej Number PB?p-249756CDH, price: PC A07/MF A01
  PRClfinvlrpnmentaj Management, Inc., McLean, VA.;
  Environmental 'Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Emergency and Remedial Response; Nov 89
  The document profiles fifty-two demonstration and emerging
  technologies being evaluated under the SITE program. Each
  technology profile contains a description of the technology; a
  discussion of its applicability  to various wastes; and  update
  on its development or demonstration  status; and any avail-
  able demonstration results. The document is intended for
  EPA regional decision-makers and other interested  individ-
  uals Involved In hazardous waste site cleanups.
  Specifications:   See also  report for 1988,  PB90-132690.
  Sponsored by Environmental Protection Agency, Washington,
  DC. Office of Emergency and Remedial Response. 129p.
  Subject index keywords:  Hazardous  materials,  Site sur-
  veys, Superfund,  Remedial action, Technology assessment,
  Waste management,  Superfund Innovative Technology Eval-
  uation Program, SITE program.
 1318  Superfund Innovative Technology Evaluation
  Program: Technology Profiles, Sixth Edition
  Order Number PB94-123858CDH, price: PC A19/MF A04
  PRO Environmental Management, Inc., Cincinnati, OH.;
  Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk
  Reduction Engineering Lab; Nov 93
  The Superfund Innovative Technology Evaluation (SITE) Pro-
  gram, now in its eighth year, is an integral part of EPA's re-
  search into alternative cleanup methods for hazardous waste
  sites  around the nation.  Under the  SITE Program, EPA
  enters into cooperative agreements with technology develop-
  ers. These developers refine their innovative technologies at
  bench- or  pilot-scale and may  demonstrate them, with sup-
  port from EPA, at hazardous waste sites. The document pro-
  files 170 demonstration,  emerging, and monitoring and meas-
   urement technologies being  evaluated under the SITE  Pro-
   gram. Each  profile describes the technology; discusses  its
   applicability to various wastes;  discusses its development or
   demonstration status and demonstration results, if available;
   and provides demonstration and technology contacts.
   Specifications: See also PB89-132690. Sponsored  by Envi-
   ronmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH.  Risk Reduction
   Engineering Lab. 438p.
   Subject index keywords: Superfund, Hazardous materials,
   Waste  treatment, SITE(Superfund  Innovative  Technology
   Evaluation).
 1319   Superfund innovative Technology Evaluation (SITE):
   Demonstration Bulletin. Flame Reactor, Horsehead
   Resource Development Company, Inc
   Order Number PB92-235613CDH, price: PC A01 /MF A01
   Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
   Emergency and Remedial Response; Aug 91
   The  Horsehead  Resource  Development  Company,   Inc.
   (HRD) Flame Reactor is a patented and proven high temper-
   ature thermal process designed to safely treat industrial resi-
   dues and wastes containing metals. During processing, the
   waste material is introduced into the hottest portion of the
   Flame Reactor, where the wastes are subjected to a very hot
   reducing gas (greater than 2000 C) produced from the com-
   bustion of solid or gaseous  hydrocarbon fuels in oxygen-en-
   riched air. The metal vapors  further  react and  cool in the
  252
  combustion chamber and cooling system to produce a metal-
  enriched oxide that is collected in a baghouse. The resulting
  metal oxides can be recycled to  recover the metals. The
  amount of waste reduction to slag and oxide depends on the
  chemical and physical properties of the waste material.
  Specifications:  4p.
  Subject index keywords:  Thermal reactors, Waste treat-
  ment, High  temperature tests, Slags, Superfund innovative
  technology evaluation.
1320  Superfund  Innovative Technology Evaluation (SITE)
  Program Evaluation Report for Antox BTX Water Screen
  (BTX Immunoassay)
  Order Number PB93-218337CDH, price: PC A06/MF A02
  Lockheed Engineering and Sciences Co., Las Vegas, NV.;
  Environmental Monitoring Systems Lab.,  Las Vegas, NV; Jun
  93
  The results of a demonstration of  a  portable immunoassay
  for the detection of benzene,  toluene,  and  xylene(s) (BTX)
  are described in the report. Seventy-nine field samples were
  obtained from monitoring wells at several sites with gasoline
  contaminated ground water. Sample splits were analyzed on-
  site by the  BTX immunoassay and in the laboratory by gas
  chromatography (GC) using EPA Method 8020. The BTX im-
  munoassay was rapid and simple to use. It performed well in
  identifying high level contamination and  gasoline contaminat-
  ed samples having BTX concentrations greater than 100
  ppb.  It  did not fully meet the claims of the developer of iden-
  tifying contamination levels down to 25 ppb BTX.  Two field
  samples determined by GC to have between 25 and 100 ppb
  BTX  failed  to be  classified correctly by the immunoassay.
  Results from quality assurance samples with BTX concentra-
  tions of 2.5, 25,  and 100 ppb also showed that false negative
  results would be expected at higher than a 5  percent rate
  when BTX  contamination levels were between  25 and 100
  ppb.  However, for  samples with higher BTX levels, the im-
  munoassay gave excellent results. Two  field samples yielded
  false positive results compared to GC values, but these sam-
  ples  showed signs of low-level gasoline  contamination.
  Specifications:   Sponsored  by  Environmental  Monitoring
  Systems Lab., Las Vegas, NV. 103p.
  Subject index keywords: Water pollution detection, Ground
  water,  Immunoassay.
 1321  Superfund Innovative Technology Evaluation (Site)
  Report for the Westinghouse Bio-Analytic Systems
  Pentachlorophenol (PCP) Immunoassays
  Order  Number PB92-188/13CDH, price: PC A06/MF A02
  Lockheed Engineering  ancl Sciences Co., Inc., Las Vegas,
  NV.  Environmental Programs Office.; Environmental
  Monitoring  Systems Lab., Las Vegas, NV; May 92
  The results of the demonstration of two Westinghouse Bio-
  Analytic Systems (WBAS) immunoassay technologies are de-
  scribed in the report. The  immunoassays measure parts per
  billion  concentrations of pentachlorophenol  in environmental
  water  samples. The study was conducted under the Super-
  fund innovative Technology Evaluation (SITE)  Program and
   designed to evaluate  the  ruggedness  and  utility of a  semi-
   quantitative immunoassay field kit. Results obtained from the
   field kit were compared to those  obtained from  a quantita-
   tive, high-sample-capacity plate immunoassay. The results of
   the  WBAS immunoassay demonstration support the conclu-
   sion that  the field immunoassay is a  useful screening tool.

-------
                                                                      TECHNOLOGY POLJCY & ADMIN)STRATK>N:
                                                                      Miscellaneous Policy & Program Documents
    The demonstration verified that the method can provide qual-
    itative or semiquantitative  screening information.  Although
    the  results were  more variable than had been  anticipated
    the  incorporation of additional  procedural precautions and
    carefully chosen quality control acceptance criteria for  on-
    site  analysis could improve performance substantially Both
    immunoassays  produced results biased high  compared  to
    the GC/MS results, but the tendency was not large and may
    have been partly due to loss during sample extraction (EPA
    Method 3510) prior to analysis by gas chromatography/mass
    spectrometry. The  detection  of structurally  related  com-
    pounds by the immunoassays may have also contributed to
   the high bias. The results indicate that the plate immunoas-
   say is an accurate and precise method for quantitating pen-
   tachlorophenol in water.
   Specifications:    Sponsored  by Environmental  Monitorinq
   Systems Lab., Las Vegas, NV.  109p.
   Subject index keywords: Pentachlorophenol.

 1322   Superfund Innovative Technology Evaluation- The
   Delaware SITE Study, 1989
   Order Number PB92-125749CDH, price: PC A08/MF A02
   NSI Technology Services Corp., Research Triangle Park
   NC.;  Battelle Columbus Labs., OH.*Environmental  Protection
   Agency, Washington, DC. Office of Emergency and Remedial
   Response; Jan 92
   The 1989  Delaware Superfund Innovative Technology  Eval-
   uation (SITE) Field Study was  a cooperative  effort between
   the Atmospheric Research and Exposure Assessment Labo-
   ratory and the Environmental Monitoring Systems  Laboratory
   located in Las Vegas, NV. The SITE was established to sat-
   isfy the mandate of the Superfund Amendments and Reau-
   tnonzation Act of 1986 to demonstrate alternative or innova-
   tive  treatment and site  characterization technologies. As
   such, the program provides for the predemonstration testing
   of new monitoring technologies.  A number of new technol-
   ogies including  sector  sampling, temporal profile analysis
   open  air long path monitoring, and fence-line dosimetry were
   employed in the  1989 study. The report documents the suc-
   cessful use of these techniques and shows their potential to
   provide the Agency and others with improved, cost-effective
   means to monitor the air exposure pathway during Superfund
   site assessment and remediation.
  Specifications:   Prepared in cooperation with  Battelle Co-
   lumbus  Labs., OH. Sponsored  by Environmental Protection
  Agency, Washington, DC. Office of Emergency and Remedial
  Response. 174p.
  Subject index keywords: Superfund, Air pollution sampling,
  Air pollution detection, Waste disposal, Volatile organic com-
  pounds.

1323  Survey of Materials-Handling Technologies  Used at
  Hazardous Waste Sites
  Order Number PB91-921283CDH,  price: PC A11/MF A02
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC.  Office of
  Emergency and Remedial Response; Jun 91
  The study summarizes the types of debris, material, and con-
  taminants found at Superfund and other hazardous  waste
  sites and the materials-handling equipment and general pro-
  cedures  used to perform  site restoration  and  cleanup The
  report provides the U.S.  Environmental Protection Agency
  (EPA)  with information on state-of-the-art materials-handling
  equipment and procedures  useful for addressing difficult
  site-specific, materials-handling problems.
   Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
   posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
   and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also  available in
   paper copy or microfiche. 226p.
   Subject  index keywords: Hazardous materials, Materials
   handling, Site surveys, Technology utilization.

 1324  Synopses of Federal Demonstrations of Innovative
   Site Remediation Technologies
   Order Number PB93-144111CDH,  price: PC A11/MF A03
   Federal Remediation Technologies Roundtable.;
   Environmental Protection Agency,  Washington, DC.
   Technology Innovation Office; Aug 92
   The collection of abstracts, compiled by the  Federal Remedi-
   ation Technology Roundtable, describes field demonstrations
   of innovative technologies to treat hazardous waste. This
   document updates and expands information  presented in the
   first  edition  of the collection which  was published in 1991.
   The collection is intended  to be an  information resource for
   hazardous waste site  project managers for assessing the
   availability and viability of innovative  technologies for treating
   contaminated ground water, soils, and sludge. This document
   represents a starting  point in the  review  of technologies
   available for application to  hazardous waste  sites. This com-
   pendium should not be looked upon as a sole source for this
   information - it does not  represent all innovative technol-
   ogies nor  all technology demonstrations performed by these
   agencies.  Only Federally sponsored  studies  and demonstra-
   tions that  have  tested innovative remedial technologies with
   site specific wastes under realistic conditions as a part of
   large  pilot- or full-scale field demonstrations are included.
  Those  studies included represent  all that  were provided to
  the Federal Remediation Technology Roundtable at the  time
  of publication. Information collection efforts are ongoing.
  Specifications:  See also PB91-921284. Sponsored by Envi-
  ronmental  Protection  Agency, Washington, DC. Technology
  Innovation Office. 233p.
  Subject index keywords: Technology  innovation, Remedial
  action,  Hazardous  materials,  Waste treatment,   Innovative
  treatment technologies.

1325  Tech  Trends Number 3, December 1990
  Order Number PB93-206357CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC.
  Technology Innovation Office; Dec 90
  The edition of Tech Trends contains an insert, 'Innovations
  in Monitoring and  Measurement Technologies'. In it, EPA's
  Environmental Monitoring Systems  Laboratory in Las Vegas
  showcases three portable monitoring  systems. The EPA En-
  vironmental Research Laboratory in  Athens,  Georgia, high-
  lights a multispectral  identification  technique for  nontarget
  analytes that improves  upon  the  current  low  resolution
  system. The Athens lab also presents information on alterna-
 tives to the Eh Probe for measuring mobility of heavy metals.
 Ada introduces BIOPLUME II.
 Specifications: See also PB93-206381. 12p.
 Subject index keywords: Superfund, Technology invention,
 Remedial action,  Trends, News media.
                                                                                                              253

-------
TECHNOLOGY POLICY & ADMINISTRATION:
Miscellaneous Policy & Program Documents
1326  Tech Trends Number 4, March 1991
  Order Number PB93:206365CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC.
  Technology Innovation Office; Mar 91
  To meet the challenge of cleanup of Superfund sites at fed-
  eral facilities, the U.S. Army Toxic and Hazardous Materials
  Agency is devising innovative ways to treat wastes on site. In
  this issue of Tech Trends, Cpt. Craig Myler tells about an in-
  nova|iye  Low  Temperature  Thermal Stripping process to
  treat soil  contaminated with cleaning solvents and fuels. The
  process expends less energy and is lower in cost than incin-
  eratioji.
  Specifications: See also PB93-206373. 6p.
  Subject Index keywords: Superfund, Technology invention,
  Remedial action, Trends, News media.
1327  Tech Trends Number 5, May 1991
  Order Number PB93-206373CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington,  DC.
  Technology Innovation Office; May 91
  The 'applied technologies journal for Superfund removals and
  remedial  actions and RCRA corrective actions contains arti-
  cles on:  Nitrate Enhanced Bioremediation;  Debris  Washing;
  Air Emissions  from Soil Excavation; and Chemical Reagent
  at Lee Farm.
  Specifications: See also PB93-206357. 6p.
  Subject Index keywords: Superfund, Technology invention,
  Remedial action, Trends.
 1328  Tech Trends (Number 8)
  Order Number PB92-221985CDH, price: PC A01/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC.  Office of
  Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Mar  92
  The Department of  Energy  (DOE) has developed and dem-
  onstrated an in situ air stripping technique that utilizes hori-
  zontal wells to remove volatile organic solvents from soil and
  groiirtdwater. The demonstration was part of the DOE's Sa-
  vannah River  Integrated Demonstration  Program. At the site,
   an abandoned process sewer line  leaked  trichloroethylene
   and tetrachloroethylene Into soil and groundwater.
   Specifications:  5p.
   Subject index keywords:  Strippers,  Ground water,  Water
   wells.
 1329   Tech Trends Number 9, June 1992
   Order Number PB93-206381CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
   Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC.
   Tecfino(ogy Innovation Office; Jun 92
   The applied technologies journal for Superfund removals and
   remedial actions arid RCRA corrective actions. In  the issue,
   the authors let you know about upcoming SITE demonstra-
   tions you can visit this summer.
   Specifications:   See  also PB93-206365,  PB92-221985,
   PB93-157626 and PB93:203958. 6p.
   Subject Index keywords: Superfund, Technology invention,
   Remedial action, Trends,  News media.
 1330  Tech Trends (Number 10)
   Order Number PB93-203958CDH, price: PC  A02/MF A01
   Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
   Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Oct 92
   Contents:  Natural Biodegradation of Fuel Vapors in  Unsatu-
   rated Zone;  Soil Washing Technology Demo at Toronto
  Harbor; RCRA Treatability Study Opportunities; ATTIC Yields
  Abundant Bioremediation Information; and an insert consist-
  ing of a notice on Innovative Thermal Treatment Technol-
  ogies: Uses and Applications  for Site Remediation  (two 4-
  hour seminars).
  Specifications:  See also PB92-221985 and PB93-157627.
  Errata sheet inserted. 8p.
  Subject index  keywords:  Superfund,  Remedial  action,
  Waste treatment, Land pollution control, Innovative treatment
  technologies.

1331  Tech Trends (Number 11)
  Order Number PB93-157626CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC.
  Technology Innovation Office; Jan 93
  Contents:  Extraction process  separates   organics  from
  sludges, soils and sediments; Organics desorbed from soil
  with  low temperature thermal  treatment; Evaporation/oxida-
  tion system treats a variety of wastewater contaminants; An-
  aerobic thermal  processor completes second PCS  remedi-
  ation.
  Specifications:  See also PB92-221985. 6p.
  Subject index keywords: Superfund, Technology invention,
  Remedial action, Trends, Resource Conservation and Recov-
  ery Act.
1332  Tech Trends: The Applied Technologies Journal for
  Superfund Removals and Remedial Actions and RCRA
  Corrective Actions, December 1993
  Order Number PB94-149879CDH, price: PC A01/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Dec 93
  Contents:  Pneumatic fracturing  increases volatile organic
  compound (VOC) extraction rate; Soil washing technology re-
  moves organics from fine and coarse grained soil, and; Elec-
  tro-osmosis holds promise for in-situ extraction.
  Specifications: See also PB93-223196. 5p.
  Subject  index  keywords:  Superfund,  Remedial  action,
  Treatment innovation.

 1333  Tech Trends: The Applied Technologies Journal for
  Superfund Removals and Remedial Actions and RCRA
  Corrective Actions. May 1993
  Order.Number PB93-223196CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Solid Waste and Emergency Response; May 93
  Both the U.S. EPA and  Environment Canada have programs
  that support emerging  innovative  technology development
  and technical evaluation  demonstrations. EPA's Superfund
  Innovative Technology Evaluation (SITE) Program and Envi-
  ronment Canada's Development and Demonstration of Site
  Remediation  Technologies (DESRT) Program are described
  in the study. The X*TRAX(TM) Model 200 Thermal Desorp-
  tion System  developed  by Chemical Waste Management,
  Inc., is a low-temperature process designed to separate or-
  ganic contaminants from soils,  sludges  and other solid
  media.
  Specifications:  See also PB93-206381 and PB93-157626.
   10p.
  Subject index  keywords: Superfund, Technology invention,
   Remedial action, Waste treatment, Thermal desorption.
  254

-------
                                                                      TECHNOLOGY POLICY & ADMINISTRATION:
                                                                      Miscellaneous Policy & Program Documents
  1334  Technical Guidance Document: Construction Quality
    Management for Remedial Action and Remedial Design
    Waste Containment Systems
    Order Number PB93-105625CDH, price: PC A05/MF A02
    Hazen and Sawyer, Raleigh, NC.; Environmental Protection
    Agency, Washington, DC. Office of Emergency and Remedial
    Response; Oct 92
    The Technical Guidance Document is intended to  augment
    the numerous construction  quality control and  construction
    quality assurance (CQC and CQA)  documents that are avail-
    able for  materials associated with  waste containment sys-
    tems  developed  for Superfund site remediation. In general
    DD^an ual 'S °riented to the remediation project manager
    (RPM) who must administer these projects.  This document
    reviews the significant physical properties associated  with
    the construction  materials used in waste containment de-
    signs  and reviews the sampling and acceptance strategies
    required  for  Construction Quality  Management. The  first
    chapter reviews  the  minimum  Federal regulatory  require-
    ments  for  waste containment systems.  Key  elements of
   these systems are identified.  The  second chapter reviews
   the key physical  properties and  conformance tests  required
   to verify these properties. The third chapter reviews samplinq
   methods.and  acceptance  criteria that are  used to verify key
   physical properties during construction.
   Specifications:  See also PB88-113295. Sponsored by Envi-
   ronmental  Protection  Agency, Washington,  DC Office of
  •Emergency and Remedial Response. 100p.
   Subject index keywords: Remedial action, Hazardous ma-
   Sties? UnPserfund' Waste management, Containment, Reme-

 1335  Technical Support Services for Superfund Site
   Remediation.  Second Edition
  Order Number PB91-921285CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
  Environmental  Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Emergency and Remedial Response; Nov 90

  I£n-*Dire?t?!L(,!oCOnd Edition)  uPdates and highlights the
  significant OSWER and ORD technical assistance programs
  that have procedures in place to process requests such as
  answering a technical question, providing staff to work on a
  problem, or referring callers to the appropriate source.
  Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order de-
  posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S Canada
  and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
  paper copy or microfiche. 73p.
  Subject index  keywords:  Sites, Hazardous materials,  Solid
  waste disposal, Superfund.

1336  Technology Demonstration  Summary, DuPbnt/
  Oberlm Microfiltration System, Palmerton, Pennsylvania.
  April-May 1992
  Order Number PB92-224351CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Center for
  hnvironmental Research Information;  Mar 92
  In April and May  1990, the U.S.  Environmental  Protection
  Agency (EPA),  under the Superfund Innovative Technology
  Eyaluation  (SITE) program, demonstrated DuPont/Oberlin's
  microfiltration system at the Palmerton Zinc Superfund (PZS)
  site  in Palmerton,  Pennsylvania.  The microfiltration system
  demonstrated at the PZS  site  was evaluated primarily  in
  terms of its ability to remove metals (mainly zinc) and  partic-
  ulates from the  contaminated groundwater on site,  while pro-
    ducing a dry filter cake and filtrate that meet applicable dis-
    posal requirements.
    Specifications: See also PB92-153410. 9p.
    Subject index keywords:  Superfund, Water pollution con-
    trol, Remedial action, Zinc, Hazardous materials,  Microfiltra-
    tion, DuPont/Oberlin Microfiltration Treatment.

  1337  Technology Evaluation Report: Babcock and Wilcox
    Cyclone Furnace Vitrification Technology. Volume 1
    Order Number PB92-222215CDH, price: PC A06/MF A02
    Science Applications International Corp., Cincinnati, OH.;
    Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk
    Reduction Engineering Lab;  Sep 92
    The project consists  of an analysis of the Babcock,and
    Wilcox (B&W)  Cyclone Furnace  Vitrification process.  The
    SITE  Demonstration took place at the B&W Research and
    Development Division in Alliance, Ohio. The vitrification proc-
    ess was performed on a synthetic soil matrix (SSM) that was
    spiked  with known concentrations of semivolatile  organic
    compounds, metals, and simulated radionuclides. The Dem-
    onstration effort was directed at obtaining information on the
    performance and cost of the process for  use at other sites.
    Documentation will consist of  two reports. This Technology
    Evaluation Report (TER) is contained in two volumes and de-
   scribes the field activities and laboratory results.
   Specifications:  See also Volume 2, PB92-222223. Spon-
   sored  by Environmental Protection  Agency,  Cincinnati,  OH
   Risk Reduction Engineering Lab. 108p.
   Subject index keywords: Soil treatment, Vitrification,  Haz-
   ardous materials, Waste management, Cyclone combustors,
   Innovative  treatment  technologies,  Superfund  Innovative
   Technology Evaluation.

 1338  Technology Evaluation Report: Babcock and Wilcox
 .  Cyclone Furnace Vitrification  Technology. Volume 2
   Order Number PB92-222223CDH, price: PC A15/MF A03
 .  Science Applications International Corp., Cincinnati, OH.;
   Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk
   Reduction Engineering Lab; Sep 92
   The Babcock & Wilcox (B&W)  Cyclone Furnace Vitrification
   Technology is a treatment process for contaminated soils.
   The process was evaluated to determine its ability to destroy
   semivolatile organics and to isolate  metals  and simulated ra-
   dionuclides into a non-leachable slag material. The feed ma-
  terial for the system was a  prepared synthetic soil  matrix
  (SSM) that was spiked with two organic compounds and six
  metals. This volume contains the appendices.
  Specifications:  See also Volume  1,  PB92-222215.  Spon-
  sored by Environmental  Protection  Agency, Cincinnati, OH.
  Risk Reduction Engineering Lab. 328p.
  Subject index keywords: Soil  treatment,  Vitrification, Haz-
  ardous  materials, Waste  management, Cyclone combustors,
  Innovative  treatment  technologies,  Superfund  Innovative
  Technology Evaluation.

1339  Technology Evaluation Report CHEMFIX
  Technologies, Inc., Solidification/Stabilization Process,
  Clackamas, Oregon. Volume 2
  Order Number PB90-274127CDH, price: PC A21/MF A03
  Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk
  Reduction Engineering Lab; Sep 90
 The project is a  field demonstration under the  Superfund In-
 novative Technology Evaluation  program  and designed  to
                                                                                                             255

-------
TECHNOLOGY POLICY & ADMINISTRATION:
Miscellaneous Policy & Program Documents
  analyze the  Chemfix Technologies, Inc. solidification/stabili-
  zation technology. The technology uses a proprietary mixture
  of silicate and cementious reagents to solidify and stabilize
  the wastes.  The technology demonstration took place at a
  former recycling facility in Clackamas, Oregon. The wastes
  consisted primarily of lead, copper, and polychlorinated  bi-
  phenyls. The demonstration effort was directed at obtaining
  information on the performance and cost of the technology
  for assessing its use at  this  as well  as other uncontrolled
  hazardous waste sites. Documentation consists of the report
  that describes the field activities and laboratory results, pro-
  vides §n interpretation of "the data, and discusses the poten-
  tial applicability of trie technology.
  Specifications:  485p.
  Subject Index  keywords: Waste treatment, Solidification,
  Chemical stabilization,  Land  pollution  control,  CHEMFIX
  process, Superfund.
 1340  Technology Evaluation Report of Retech, Inc.,
  Plasma Centrifugal Furnace. Volume 1
  Order Number PB92-216035CDH, price: PC A09/MF A02
  Science Applications International Corp., San Diego, CA.;
  Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk
  Reduction Engineering tab; Jul 92
  A demonstration of the Retech,  Inc. Plasma Centrifugal Fur-
  nace (PCF) was conducted under the Superfund Innovative
  Technology Evaluation (SITE) Program at the  Department of
   Energy's (DOE's) Component Development and Integration
   Facility in Butte, Montana. The  furnace uses heat generated
   from a plasma arc to melt and vitrify solid feed material. The
   feed soil was a mixture of Silver Bow Creek soil and  10% by
   weight No. 2 diesel oil,  spiked to provide 28,000 ppm zinc
   oxide and 1000 ppm hexachlorobenzene in the soil/oil mix-
   ture. Pre-treatment soil and scrubber liquor/makeup sampling
   was performed to characterize the  material inputs  to  the
   process. Following  treatment,  the vitrified  soil,  scrubber
   liquor, and stack gas were sampled to determine the technol-
   ogy's suitability for use  in destroying and immobilizing con-
   taminants in the test soil. The results from the test were
   used  to draw conclusions on  the  technology.  The conclu-
   sions derived from the test results are presented.
   Specifications: See also PB92-216043 and DE91015815.
   Sponsored by  Environmental Protection  Agency, Cincinnati,
   OH. Risk Reduction Engineering Lab. 190p.
   Subject index keywords:  Plasma  furnaces,  Incinerators,
   Waste disposal, Hazardous materials.
  1341  Technology Evaluation Report of Retech, Inc.,
   Plasma Centrifugal Furnace. Volume 2
   Order Number  PB92-216043CDH, price: PC A15/MF A03
   Science Applications International Corp., San Diego, CA.;
    Envfronmenta!  Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk
    Reduction  Engineering Lab; Jul 92
    A demonstration of the  Retech, Inc.  Plasma Centrifugal Fur-
    nace (PCF) was conducted  under the Superfund Innovative
    Technology Evaluation (SITE) Program at the Department of
    Energy's (DOE's) Component Development  and Integration
    Facility  in  Butte, Montana. The following conclusions were
    derived from  the  test  results: (1) the treated  soil  did not
    leach any  metals at levels above the regulatory limits; (2) the
    process achieved  a Destruction  and  Removal  Efficiency
    (DRE) of greater than 99.99% for the Principal Organic  Haz-
    ardous  Constituent (POHC);  (3)  the  air pollution control
    system  did not reduce  the  level of particulate emissions to
 below the RCRA limit;  (4) a high percentage of the metals
 fed to the furnace are  encapsulated in the treated soil; (5)
 the PCF is advantageous over other incinerator technologies
 in that  it  can successfully immobilize  heavy metals in the
 slag; however, this treatment option can be more expensive
 than conventional incineration. The  report is  the second
 volume  of the two-volume series. This  volume contains the
 appendixes for the demonstration of the plasma centrifugal
 furnace.
 Specifications:  See also PB92-216035. Sponsored by Envi-
 ronmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk Reduction
 Engineering Lab. 331 p.
 Subject index  keywords:  Plasma furnaces,  Incinerators,
 Waste disposals, Hazardous materials.

1342  Technology Evaluation Report of Retech's Plasma
 Centrifugal Furnace. Volume  1
 Order Number PB93-115160CDH, price: PC A09/MF A02
  Science Applications International Corp., San Diego, CA.;
  Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk
  Reduction Engineering  Lab; Apr 92
  A demonstration of the Retech, Inc. Plasma Centrifugal Fur-
  nace (PCF) was conducted under  the  Superfund Innovative
  Technology Evaluation (SITE)  Program at the Department of
  Energy's  (DOE's) Component Development and Integration
  Facility in Butte, Montana. The furnace uses heat generated
  from a plasma arc to melt and vitrify solid  feed material. The
  feed soil was a mixture of Silver Bow Creek soil and 10 per-
  cent by weight No. 2 diesel oil, spiked to provide 28,000 ppm
  zinc oxide and  1000 ppm hexachlorobenzene in the soil/oil
  mixture. Pre-treatment soil and scrubber liquor/makeup sam-
  pling was performed to characterize  the  material  inputs to
  the process. Following treatment,  the  vitrified soil, scrubber
  liquor,  and stack gas were sampled to determine the technol-
  ogy's suitability for use in destroying and immobilizing con-
  taminants in  the  test soil.  The results from the test were
  used to draw conclusions on the technology.
  Specifications: See  also Volume 2, PB93-115178.  Spon-
  sored  by Environmental  Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH.
  Risk Reduction Engineering Lab. 190p.
  Subject index keywords: Heat treatment, Waste treatment,
  Soil treatment,  Superfund, Innovative treatment technologies,
   Plasma centrifugal furnaces.
 1343  Technology Evaluation  Report of Retech's Plasma
   Centrifugal Furnace. Volume 2
   Order  Number  PB93-115178CDH,  price: PC A15/MF A03
   Science Applications International  Corp., San Diego, CA.;
   Environmental  Protection Agency,  Cincinnati, OH. Risk
   Reduction Engineering Lab; Apr 92
   The volume contains the appendices for volume 1. The
   report contains TCLP  data; particulates data; stack gas data;
   feed soil data; treated soil data; pretest scrubber liquor data;
   posttest scrubber liquor data; scrubber make-up data; contin-
   uous emission monitors data; physical results data; gas sam-
   pling logs; audit reports; and equipment operations data.
   Specifications:  See also Volume 1, PB93-115160. Spon-
   sored by Environmental Protection  Agency,  Cincinnati, OH.
   Risk Reduction Engineering Lab. 348p.
   Subject index keywords: Heat treatment, Waste treatment,
   Soil treatment, Superfund, Innovative treatment technologies,
   Plasma centrifugal furnaces.
  256

-------
                                                                     TECHNOLOGY POLICY & ADMINISTRATION:
                                                                     Miscellaneous Policy & Program Documents
 1344  Technology Evaluation Report: Ogden Circulating
   Bed Combustor at the McColl Superfund Site
   Order Number PB92-227289CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
   Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk
   Reduction Engineering Lab; Jan 92
   The Superfund Innovative Technology Evaluation (SITE) Pro-
   gram was authorized in the  1986 Superfund amendments.
   The report provides documentation of a pilot-scale treatability
   study  and demonstration of  an  innovative  technology that
   took place in San  Diego, California at the  Ogden  Environ-
   mental Services (OES) Research facility.  Observation and
   sampling  of a  research-scale circulating  bed combustor
   (CBC) took place during a preliminary  test sponsored under
   an agreement  between the SITE Program and OES. The
   treatability study was conducted on a minimal amount of rep-
   resentative McColl  Site waste to determine if a full SITE
   Demonstration is feasible.
   Specifications:  69p.
   Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste treat-
   ment, Superfund, Circulating bed combustor.

 1345  Technology Evaluation Report: Perox-Pure (Trade
   Name) Chemical Oxidation Technology
   Order Number PB93-213528CDH, price: PC A06/MF A02
   PRC Environmental  Management, Inc., Chicago, IL;
   Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati,  OH. Risk
   Reduction Engineering Lab; Aug 93
   The report evaluates the perox-pure chemical oxidation tech-
   nology's ability to remove volatile organic compounds (VOC)
   and  other organic contaminants present in liquid wastes. The
   report also presents economic data from the Superfund Inno-
   vative Technology Evaluation (SITE) demonstration and three
   cases studies. The perox-pure chemical oxidation technology
   was developed by Peroxidation Systems Inc. (PSI),  to de-
   stroy dissolved organic contaminants in water. The technolo-
   gy uses ultraviolet (UV) radiation  and hydrogen peroxide  to
   oxidize organic compounds present in water at parts  per mil-
   lion levels or less. This treatment technology produces no air
   emissions and generates no sludge or  spent media  that re-
   quire further  processing,  handling, or disposal. The  perox-
   pure chemical oxidation technology was demonstrated under
  the SITE Program at Lawrence Livermore National Laborato-
  ry Site 300 in Tracy,  CA. Over a 3-week period in September
   1992, about 40,000 gallons of VOC contaminated  ground
  water was treated in the perox-pure system. For the SITE
  demonstration, the perox-pure system achieved trichloroeth-
  ene (TCE) and tetrachloroethene (PCE) removal efficiencies
  of about 99.7  & 97.1  percent, respectively.
  Specifications:   Sponsored  by  Environmental  Protection
  Agency, Cincinnati,  OH.  Risk Reduction Engineering Lab
  113p.
  Subject index keywords: Waste  treatment,  Water pollution
  control,  Volatile organic compounds, Oxidation, Perox-pure
  chemical oxidation technology.

1346  Technology Evaluation Report: SITE Program. CF
  Systems Organics Extraction System, New Bedford,
  Massachusetts. Volume 1
  Order Number PB90-186495CDH, price:  PC A06/MF A01
  Science Applications International Corp., McLean, VA.;
  Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk
  Reduction Engineering  Lab; Jan 90
  The report summarizes the results of a Superfund Innovative
  Technology Evaluation (SITE) demonstration of the CF Sys-
   tems critical fluid organics extraction system at the New Bed-
   ford Harbor,  Massachusetts Superfund site. The technology
   depends on  the ability of organic pollutants to solubilize in
   the process  solvent, a liquefied gas. The pollutants treated
   include polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) and polynuclear ar-
   omatic hydrocarbons. The report examines the performance
   of the process in terms of PCB extraction efficiency,  variation
   in process operating conditions, potential health and safety
   impacts, equipment  and  handling problems, and projected
   system economics. Volume I covers process design, field ac-
   tivities, sampling and analytical program, and results and dis-
   cussion.
   Specifications:  See also  Volume 2, PB90-186503. Spon-
   sored  by Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH.
   Risk Reduction Engineering Lab. 106p.
   Subject index keywords: Solvent extraction, Waste dispos-
   al,  Sediments, Water pollution  control, Hazardous materials,
   Aromatic  polycyclic   hydrocarbons,  Superfund Innovative
   Technology Evaluation, Technology utilization, Marine  dis-
   posal,  Cleanup operations, Polychlorinated biphenyls.

 1347 Technology Evaluation Report: SITE Program. CF
   Systems Organics Extraction  System, New Bedford,
   Massachusetts.  Volume 2
   Order Number PB90-186503CDH, price: PC A08/MF  A01
   Science Applications  International Corp., McLean, VA.;
   Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk
   Reduction Engineering Lab; Jan 90
   The report summarizes the results of a Superfund Innovative
   Technology Evaluation (SITE) demonstration of the CF Sys-
   tems critical fluid organics extraction system at the New Bed-
   ford Harbor, Massachusetts Superfund site.  The technology
   depends on the  ability of organic pollutants to solubilize in
   the process solvent,  a liquefied gas. The pollutants treated
   include polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) and polynuclear ar-
   omatic hydrocarbons. The report examines the performance
   of the process in terms of  PCB  extraction efficiency, variation
   in process operating  conditions, potential health and safety
   impacts, equipment  and handling problems, and projected
  system economics. Volume II contains  sampling and analyti-
  cal reports and operating log data.
  Specifications:   See also Volume  1,  PB90-186495. Spon-
  sored  by Environmental Protection Agency,  Cincinnati, OH.
  Risk Reduction Engineering Lab. 173p.
  Subject index keywords: Solvent extraction, Waste  dispos-
  al, Sediments, Water  pollution control,  Hazardous materials,
  Aromatic polycyclic hydrocarbons, Chemical  analysis, Pollu-
  tion monitoring, Superfund  Innovative Technology Evaluation,
  Technology Utilization, Marine  disposal, Polychlorinated  bi-
  phenyls.

1348  Technology Evaluation Report: SITE Program
  Demonstration. EPA  RREL's Mobile Volume Reduction
  Unit
  Order Number PB94-136264CDH, price: PC A07/MF A02
  Science Applications International Corp., Cincinnati, OH.;
  Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk
  Reduction Engineering Lab; Dec 93
  The document provides a detailed description of the U.S. En-
  vironmental Protection Agency (EPA) Risk Reduction Labora-
  tory's (RREL's) Volume Reduction Unit (VRU) process and
  system.  Detailed  results from a demonstration of the VRU
  was conducted in the fall  of  1992 using RREL's pilot-scale
                                                                                                              257

-------
TECHNOLOGY POLICY & ADMINISTRATION:
Miscellaneous Policy & Program Documents
  unit at the Escambia Treating Company Superfund  Site in
  Pensacola, Florida, the technological effectiveness and the
  economics of the process are assessed on the basis of ex-
  tensive  analytical and  quality assurance programs.  Quality
  assurance of the sampling and analysis effort is an integral
  part of  this document. Operational data and sampling and
  analysis information were carefully compiled to establish  a
  database against which other available data, as well as the
  developer's claims, could  be compared and evaluated.
  Specifications:   Sponsored  by  Environmental  Protection
  Agency,  Cincinnati, OH.  Risk Reduction Engineering  Lab.
  130p.
  Subject index keywords: Superfund, Hazardous materials,
  Soil pollution,  Wood  preservatives, PCP(Pentachlorophenol).

1349 technology Evaluation Report: Site" Program
  Demonstration of a  Trial Excavation at the McColl
  Superfund Site
  Order Number PB92-226448CDH, price: PC A10/MF A03
  IT Corp., Cincinnati, OH.;  Environmental Protection Agency,
  Cincinnati, OH. Risk Reduction Engineering Lab; Sep 92
  A trial excavation of approximately 137 cubic yards of waste
  was performed at the McColl Superfund Site in Fullerton, CA,
  to better determine the nature of the waste, any treatment
  needed  to  improve  its  handling  characteristics, and the
  exteril of air emissions that might occur during excavation.
  The type of information is necessary to plan full-scale reme-
  diatiqrl of the highly acidic petroleum refinery waste buried  at
  the site. The trial excavation was conducted within a tempo-
  rary enclosure with air exhausted from the enclosure  through
  a sodium  hydroxide-based  wet  scrubber and activated-
  carbon  bed adsorber to reduce air emissions of sulfur dioxide
  and organic compounds. Foam was  used in an attempt  to
  suppress atmospheric releases from the raw  waste during
  excavation, storage,  and processing. The air  exhaust was
  monitored for total hydrocarbons and sulfur dioxide before
  and after the air emission  control system. In addition, total
  hydrocarbons and sulfur dioxide were monitored along the
  site perimeter to determine potential  impact of air emissions
  on the nearby community.
  Specifications: See also PB92-105857. Sponsored by Envi-
  ronmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati,  OH. Risk Reduction
  Engineering Lab. 212p.
  Subject index  keywords: Soils, Incinerators, Waste  treat-
  ment. Hazardous materials, Superfund, Fulierton(California).

 1350  Technology Evaluation Report: SITE Program
  Demonstration of the DuPont/Oberlin Microfiltration
  Technology
  Order Number PB92-153410CDH, price: PC A06/MF  A02
   PRC Environmental Management, Inc., Chicago, IL;
   Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk
   Reduction Engineering Lab; Mar 92
   In April and  May 1990, the U.S. Environmental  Protection
   Agency (EPA),  under  the Superfund Innovative Technology
   Evaluation  (SITE) program, demonstrated Dupont/Oberlin's
   microfiltration system at  the Pamerton Zinc Superfund  (PZS)
   site in  Palmerton, Pennsylvania. The microfiltration system
   combines Dupont's  Tyvek  T-980 filter media with Oberlin's
   automatic pressure  filter and is designed to remove  solids
   larger than 0.1  micron in diameter from liquid wastes. The
   microfiltration system demonstrated at the  PZS site was
   evaluated primarily in terms  of  its ability to remove metals
   (mainly zinc) and particulates from the contaminated ground-
  water on site, while producing a  dry filter cake and filtrate
  that meet applicable disposal requirements.
  Specifications:  See also PB92-119023. Sponsored by Envi-
  ronmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk Reduction
  Engineering Lab. 109p.
  Subject index keywords: Water pollution control,  Land pol-
  lution  control,  Hazardous  materials,  Superfund,  Remedial
  action,  Liquid wastes, Microfiltration, DuPont/Oberlin Microfil-
  tration Treatment.

1351  Technology Evaluation Report: SITE Program
  Demonstration of the Ultrox International Ultraviolet
  Radiation/Oxidation Technology
  Order Number PB90-198177CDH,  price: PC A07/MF A01
  PRC Environmental Management,  Inc., Chicago, IL.;
  Environmental Protection Agency,  Cincinnati, OH. Risk
  Reduction Engineering Lab; Jan 90
  The document presents the field evaluation  results of the ul-
  traviolet  radiation  (UV)/oxidation  technology developed by
  Ultrox International, Santa  Ana, California. The field evalua-
  tion of the  technology was performed at the Lorentz Barrel
  and Drum (LB&D) site in San Jose, California, under the Su-
  perfund Innovative Technology  Evaluation (SITE) program
  from February 27 through March 10, 1989. The UV/oxidation
  technology  uses UV radiation, ozone, and hydrogen peroxide
  to oxidize  organic contaminants present in water. At the
  LB&D site,  this technology was evaluated in treating ground
  water contaminated with volatile organic compounds (VOCs).
  The  Ultrox system achieved VOC  removals greater  than
  90%. The majority  of VOC's were removed through chemical
  oxidation. However, for a few VOC's, such as 1,1,1-trichlor-
  oethane (1,1,1-TCA) and 1,1-dichloroethane (1,1-DCA) strip-
  ping also contributed toward removal.  The treated ground
  water met  the applicable discharge standards (NPDES) for
  disposal into a local waterway  at  95% confidence  level.
  There were no harmful air emissions from the Ultrox system
  into the atmosphere.
  Specifications:    Sponsored by  Environmental  Protection
  Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk  Reduction Engineering  Lab.
  141p.
  Subject index  keywords: Waste,  Hazardous  materials,
  Water  pollution control, Ground  water, Ultraviolet radiation,
  Oxidation, Superfund Innovative Technology Evaluation Pro-
  gram, Ultrox treatment, Volatile organic compounds.

 1352  Technology Evaluation Report: Site Program
  Demonstration Test. Accutech Pneumatic Fracturing
  Extraction and Hot Gas Injection, Phase 1. Volume 1
  Order Number PB93-216596CDH, price: PC A08/MF A02
  Science Applications International Corp., Hackensack, NJ.;
  Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk
  Reduction Engineering Lab; Jul 93
  The Pneumatic Fracturing  Extraction  (PFE)  process  devel-
  oped by Accutech Remedial Systems, Inc.  makes it possible
  to use vapor extraction to  remove volatile  organics at  in-
  creased rates from a broader range of vadose zones. The
  low permeability of silts, clays, shales,  etc. would otherwise
  make such formations unsuitable for cost-effective vapor ex-
  traction and require more costly approaches. Pneumatic frac-
  turing  provides an  innovative means of increasing  the perme-
  ability  of a formation  and  thus extending the radius of influ-
  ence so that contaminants  can  be effectively  extracted.  In
  the PFE process, fracture  wells are drilled in the contaminat-
 258

-------
                                                                     TECHNOLOGY POLICY & ADMINISTRATION:
                                                                     Miscellaneous Policy & Program Documents
   ed vadose zone and left open bore (uncased)  for most of
   their depth. A packer system is used to isolate small  (2 ft)
   intervals so that short bursts (- 20 sec) of compressed air
   (less than 500 psig) can  be injected into the interval to frac-
   ture the formation. The process is repeated for each interval.
   The fracturing extends and enlarges existing fissures and/or
   introduces new fractures, primarily in the horizontal direction.
   When fracturing has  been completed, the formations  then
   subjected to vapor extraction.
   Specifications:    Sponsored  by Environmental  Protection
   Agency, Cincinnati, OH.  Risk Reduction Engineering  Lab.
   165p.
   Subject index  keywords: Land pollution control,  Remedial
   action,  Soil  treatment, Volatile organic compounds,   Soil
   vapor extraction, Pneumatic fracturing extraction.

 1353  Technology Evaluation Report: SITE Program
   Demonstration Test Horsehead Resource Development
   Company, Inc., Flame Reactor Technology, Monaca,
   Pennsylvania
   Order Number PB92-205855CDH, price: PC A07/MF A02
   PRC Environmental Management, Inc., Houston, TX.;
   Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH.  Risk
   Reduction Engineering Lab; Jul 92
   A SITE demonstration of  the Horsehead Resource Develop-
   ment (HRD) Company, Inc. Flame Reactor Technology was
   conducted in March  1991 at the HRD facility in Monaca,
   Pennsylvania. For the demonstration, secondary lead smelter
   soda  slag was  treated to produce a  potentially  recyclable
   lead-  and  zinc-enriched oxide product and a nonhazardous
   (based on the regulatory  requirements of the Toxicity Char-
   acteristic test) effluent slag. The lead and zinc in the oxide
  product were concentrated about threefold from  the feed
  concentrations. The effluent slag was determined to be non-
  hazardous based on extraction by the Toxicity Characteristic
  Leaching Procedure. Potential  wastes that might be treated
  include industrial residues, Resource Conservation and Re-
  covery Act wastes, Superfund wastes, and other wastes con-
  taminated with metals and organic wastes.
  Specifications:    Sponsored  by Environmental  Protection
  Agency, Cincinnati, OH.  Risk Reduction  Engineering Lab
  128p.
  Subject index keywords: Hight temperature tests, Industrial
  waste treatment, SITE program, Superfund.

1354  Technology Transfer Needs Assessment, 1990
  Order Number PB91 -125674CDH, price: PC A06/MF A01
  IGF, Inc., Fairfax, VA.;  Environmental Management Support,
  Silver Spring, MD.*Environmental Protection Agency
  Washington, DC. Office of  Solid Waste and Emergency
  Response;  Apr 90
  The report summarizes the results of the Office  of Solid
  Waste  and Emergency Response (OSWER)  Technology
  Transfer Needs Assessment of FY 1990. The effort extends
  and updates a 1986 needs assessment conducted for  the
  Superfund program and previous ORD studies  on Regional
  research and technology transfer needs. It encompasses the
  Superfund (CERCLA), Hazardous Waste (RCRA), and Under-
  ground Storage Tank (UST) programs, including OSWER en-
  forcement.  Regional Environmental Service Divisions (ESDs)
  and  Superfund Technical  Support  Project  Forum members
  were also included in the survey. The study attempts to  ex-
  plore actual and future needs, to the extent possible and  fur-
  ther provides guidance for selecting technology transfer  de-
   livery  methods,  including  electronic  and other advanced
   media for information distribution, based on specific  needs
   and audience characteristics. The results indicate the priority
   of technical needs across program areas and Regions, and
   provide previously unavailable  data regarding OSWER audi-
   ences.
   Specifications: Prepared in cooperation with Environmental
   Management Support, Silver Spring, MD. Sponsored by Envi-
   ronmental Protection Agency,  Washington,  DC. Office of
   Solid Waste and Emergency Response. 112p.
   Subject index keywords: Hazardous  materials,  Technology
   transfer, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response,
   Waste management.

 1355  Terra Vac In situ Vacuum Extraction System:
   Applications Analysis Report
   Order Number PB90-119744CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
   Foster Wheeler Enviresponse, Inc., Livingston, NJ.;
   Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH.  Risk
   Reduction Engineering Lab; Jul  89
   The report analyzes the results from the SITE Program's 56-
   day demonstration at the Valley Manufactured Product Com-
   pany's site in  Groveland, Massachusetts. Conclusions were
   reached concerning the technology's suitability for use in re-
   mediations involving  both  similar and  different materials at
   other sites. Operational data and sampling and analysis infor-
   mation were monitored  carefully to  establish a database
   against which  vendor's claims  for the technology could be
   evaluated. Additional  data  on the technology's performance
   at other sites is also discussed.  The conclusions from the re-
   sults of the Groveland demonstration  test and  from  other
   available data  are: the process can be used to remediate a
   site contaminated with VOCs; the process can remove VOCs
  from soils with permeabilities as low as 10 to the 8th power
  cm/s; the process operates well in all weather  conditions;
  and  the process  implementation costs can be  as  low as
  $20/ton, depending on various site-specific conditions.
  Specifications:   Sponsored by Environmental  Protection
  Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk  Reduction  Engineering  Lab.
  65p.
  Subject index keywords: Site surveys, Hazardous materi-
  als, Vacuum apparatus, Extraction, Water pollution  control,
  Volatile organic compounds, Superfund program,  Remedial
  action, Waste management.

1356  Terra Vac In situ Vacuum  Extraction System:
  Applications Analysis Report
  Order Number PB90-126665CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
  Foster Wheeler Enviresponse, Inc., Edison, NJ.;
  Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk
  Reduction  Engineering Lab; Jul 89
  The document is an evaluation  of the  Terra Vac  in  situ
  vacuum extraction system and its applicability as a treatment
  method for waste site cleanup.  The report analyzes  the re-
  sults  from  the  Superfund Innovative Technology  Evaluation
  (SITE) Program's 56-day demonstration at the Valley Manu-
  factured  Product Company's site in Groveland,  Massachu-
  setts  and  data from  other  applications.  Conclusions were
  reached concerning the technology's suitability for use in re-
  mediations involving both  similar and different  materials at
  other sites. Operational data and sampling and analysis infor-
  mation were monitored carefully to  establish  a database
  against which vendor's claims for the  technology could be
                                                                                                              259

-------
TECHNOLOGY POLICY & ADMINISTRATION:
Miscellaneous Policy & Program Documents
  evaluated. The conclusions from the results of the Groveland
  demonstration test and from other available data are: (1) the
  process can be used to remediate a site contaminated with
  VOCs; (2) the process can remove VOCs from soils with per-
  meabilities as low as 10 to the minus eighth power cm/s; (3)
  the process operates well in all weather conditions; and (4)
  the process implementation costs can be as low as $10/ton,
  depending on various site-specific conditions.
  Specifications:  Color illustrations reproduced  in black and
  white.  Sponsored by Environmental Protection Agency, Cin-
  cinnati, OH. Risk Reduction Engineering Lab. 65p.
  Subject  index keywords: Hazardous  materials, Waste  dis-
  posal,  Site surveys, Clean-up operations, Superfund program,
  Groveland(Massachusetts), Terra Vac in situ vacuum extrac-
  tion systems.
 1357  Thermal Desorption Treatment
  Order  Number PB91-228080CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
  Science Applications International Corp., Cincinnati, OH.;
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Emergency and Remedial Response; May 91
  Thermal  desorption is an ex situ means to physically sepa-
  rate volatile and  some semivolatile contaminants from soil,
  sediments, sludges, and filter cakes. For wastes containing
  up to10% organics or less, thermal desorption can be used
  alone  for site remediation. It also may find  applications  in
  conjunction with other technologies or be appropriate to spe-
  cific operable units  at a site.  Site-specific treatability studies
  may be necessary to document the applicability and perform-
  ance of  a thermal desorption system. Thermal desorption is
  applicable to organic wastes and generally is not  used for
  treating metals and other inorganics. Depending on the spe-
  cific  thermal  desorption vendor  selected, the technology
  heats contaminated  media between 200-1000  F, driving off
  water and volatile contaminants. Offgases  may be burned in
  an afterburner, condensed  to reduce the volume to be dis-
  posed, or captured by carbon adsorption beds. The bulletin
  provides  information on the  technology applicability, limita-
  tlonSj  the types  of residuals produced, the  latest perform-
  ance  data,  site  requirements, the status  of the technology,
  and sources for further information.
  Specifications:   Sponsored  by Environmental Protection
  Agency, Washington, DC. Office of Emergency and Remedial
   Response. 10p.
   Subject Index keywords: Waste treatment,  Hazardous ma-
   terials. Thermal environments, Desorption.
 1358 foxlcologlcai Assessment of Hazardous Wastes
   Order Number AD-P006 468/3CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
   Environmental Protection Agency, Seattle, WA. Office of
   Research and Development; Mar 92
   Section  121  of the Comprehensive Environmental Response,
   Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980 (SUPERFUND) calls
   for hazardous waste site  remediations which permanently
   and significantly reduce the volume,  toxicity,  or mobility of
   hazardous substances, pollutants, and contaminants. Tradi-
   tional engineering technology has concentrated on reduction
   in volume and  mobility  as assessed  by  chemical  and  geo-
   physical  measures.  It was  assumed that accomplishment of
   volume  and mobility reduction would  lead to reductions in
   toxicity. Environmental  scientists  long  have argued that this
   assumption might not be the case. However, lack of consen-
   sus on  how complex hazardous waste mixtures  should  be
   measured lexicologically hampered integrated assessments.
 Therefore, a battery of aquatic and terrestrial bioassays was
 assembled and evaluated  comparatively  against several
 chemicals and waste  site chemical mixtures. The bioassays
 were then applied to  a mobility reduction  demonstration to
 assess its overall chemical, physical, and biological perform-
 ance.  Results indicated that, while the primary objective of
 mobility reduction seemed to be achieved, undesirable sec-
 ondary effects (toxicity) were introduced.  These trade-offs
 must be considered in the holistic sense when remediation
 measures are being implemented.
 Specifications:  This article is from 'Managment of Bottom
 Sediments Containing Toxic Substances: Proceedings  of the
 US/Japan Experts Meeting (14th) Held in Yokohama,  Japan
 on 27 February-1 March  1990,'  AD-A250 148,  p260-271.
 12p.
 Subject index keywords: Toxicity, Waste  management, Su-
 perfund.

1359  Toxicological Implementations of Remediating
 Hazardous Wastes
 Order Number PB92-124171CDH,  price: PC A03/MF A01
 Corvallis Environmental Research  Lab., OR; 1991
 Section  121  of the amendments  (1986) to the Comprehen-
 sive  Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability
 Act of 1980 (SUPERFUND) calls for hazardous waste site re-
  mediations that will permanently and  significantly  reduce the
 volume, toxicity, or mobility of hazardous substances,  pollut-
  ants,  and contaminants. Traditional engineering  technology
  has concentrated on  reduction in  volume and mobility as as-
  sessed  by chemical  and  geophysical measures, assuming
  that  reduction  in volume and mobility would  lead to  reduc-
  tions  in toxicity. Environmental scientists  long have argued
  that this might not be the case. However,  lack of consensus
  on how complex hazardous waste mixtures should be meas-
  ured  toxicologically has hampered integrated assessments.
  Therefore, new work was  initiated to  assemble a battery of
  aquatic  and  terrestrial bioassays to be evaluated compara-
  tively against several  individual chemicals,  mixtures of  chemi-
  cals, and actual waste site chemical mixtures. The bioassays
  were then applied to a mobility  reduction demonstration to
  help assess  its overall chemical, physical,  and biological per-
  formance. Results indicated that although  remediation  ac-
  complished the primary objective of  mobility reduction, it  in-
  troduced undesirable  secondary effects  (toxicity).  These
  trade-offs must  be  considered  in the holistic  sense  with
  regard to the implementation and evaluation of  remediation
  measures.
  Specifications:  Pub. in Proceedings, International Confer-
  ence of the Protection of the Environment,  Lublin, Poland,
  September  16-19, 1991   and  International Conference  on
  Bioindication of  Reg. Deterioration (6th), Ceske Budejovic,
  Czechoslovakia, September 15-21,  1991. See  also PB88-
  125430. 20p.
  Subject index keywords: Toxicology, Remedial  action, Haz-
  ardous materials, Bioassay, Toxic substances.

 1360  Toxicological Profile for Benzo(b)Fluoranthene
  Order Number PB90-247651CDH, price: PC A05/MF A01
  ICF-Clement, Washington, DC.; Agency for Toxic  Substances
  and Disease Registry, Atlanta, GA.*Environmental Protection
  Agency, Washington, DC; Mar 90
  The Toxicological Profile for Benzo(b)fluoranthene is intend-
  ed to characterize the toxicological and health effects infor-
 260
                                  , Imli , [\lSt\i\ Ill'ilnil,	 :i
                                                                 in! .Ml	MI,!	! M,i|i!!i;i,,'!'i'	Li ill

-------
                                                                     TECHNOLOGY POLICY & ADMINISTRATION:
                                                                     Miscellaneous Policy & Program Documents
   mation for the substance. It identifies and reviews the key lit-
   erature  that describes the substance's toxicological proper-
   ties. Other literature is presented but described in less detail.
   The profile begins with a public health statement, which de-
   scribes  in nontechnical  language the substance's  relevant
   toxicoiogical properties.  Following the statement is  material
   that presents levels  of significant human exposure and,
   where known, significant health effects.
   Specifications:  Sponsored by Agency for Toxic Substances
   and Disease Registry, Atlanta, GA., and Environmental Pro-
   tection Agency, Washington, DC. 76p.
   Subject  index  keywords:  Hazardous materials, Toxicity,
   Public health, Superfund, Benzofluoranthene.

1361   Toxicological Profile for Trichloroethylene
   Order Number PB90-127523CDH, price: PC A07/MF A01
  Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry, Atlanta,
   GA.; Syracuse Research Corp., NY.**Oak Ridge National
   Lab., TN.*Environmental Protection Agency, Washington,
   DC; Oct 89
  The ATSDR Toxicological Profile for Trichloroethylene is in-
  tended to characterize succinctly the toxicological and health
  effects information for the  substance.  It  identifies  and re-
  views the key literature that describes the substances's toxi-
  cological properties.  Other literature  is presented  but de-
  scribed in less detail. The profile is not intended to be an ex-
  haustive  document;  however,  more comprehensive sources
  of specialty information  are referenced. The profile  begins
  with a public health statement, which describes in nontechni-
  cal  language  the substance's relevant toxicological  proper-
  ties. Following the statement is material that presents  levels
  of significant human exposure and, where known, significant
  health effects. The adequacy of information to determine the
  substance's health effects is  described. Research gaps  in
  nontoxic  and  health effects information are described. Re-
  search gaps that are of significance  to the  protection of
  public health will  be identified in a separate  effort. The focus
  of the document is on health and toxicological information.
  Specifications:  Prepared in cooperation with Syracuse Re-
  search Corp.,  NY., and Oak Ridge National Lab., TN. Spon-
  sored by Environmental Protection Agency,  Washington, DC.
  146p.
  Subject index keywords: Toxicology, Trichloroethylene.

1362  Tracking Toxic Substances at Industrial  Facilities:
  Engineering Mass Balance versus Materials Accounting
  Order Number PB92-223213CDH, price: PC A09/MF A02
  National Research Council, Washington, DC.; Environmental
  Protection Agency, Washington, DC;  1990
  In response to a congressional mandate, this book examines
  whether  knowing the amounts of toxic substances entering
  and leaving manufacturing facilities is useful in evaluating
  chemical  releases to the  environment,  waste  reduction
  progress, and  chemical  management  practices. Tracking
  these substances with rigorous engineering data is compared
  with  a less  resource-intensive alternative to determine the
  feasibility and potential usefulness to the public  and the gov-
  ernment.
  Specifications:   Library  of Congress catalog card no. 89-
  62948.  Sponsored by  Environmental  Protection Agency,
  Washington, DC. 191 p.
  Subject index keywords: Toxic substances, Environmental
  surveys,  Industrial  wastes,  Mass balance, Waste manage-
  ment.

1363   U.S. EPA SITE Demonstration of AWD Technologies'
  AquaDetox/SVE System
  Order Number PB92-124387CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk
  Reduction Engineering Lab; c1991
  The  report covers  the results  of the Superfund  Innovative
  Technology Evaluation Program's demonstration of the AWD
  Technologies AquaDetox/SVE. The  system  combines a
  vacuum assisted steam stripping unit and a soil vapor gas
  extraction system into an  integrated unit.  The demonstration
  was  conducted during September  1990  at the  Lockheed
  Aeronautical System Corp. in Burbank, CA. The results of a
  2-week demonstration confirmed the ability of the system to
  meet regulatory discharge requirements for the contaminants
  of concern, TCE and PCE.
  Specifications: Pub. in Jnl. of Air Waste Management Asso-
  ciation, v41 n11 p1519-1523 Nov 91. 7p.
  Subject index keywords: Superfund,  Land pollution control,
  Water pollution control,  Remedial action, Waste  manage-
  ment, Volatile organic  compounds, AquaDetox/SVE  treat-
  ment system.

1364   Ultrox International Ultraviolet Radiation/Oxidation
  Technology: Applications Analysis Report
  Order Number PB91-129759CDH, price: PC A05/MF A01
  PRC  Environmental  Management, Inc.,  Chicago, IL;
  Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk
  Reduction Engineering Lab; Sep 90
  In support of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's
  (EPA) Superfund Innovative  Technology  Evaluation (SITE)
  Program,  the report evaluates both treatment efficiency and
  economic cost from the SITE demonstration and seven case
  studies. The Ultrox  technology simultaneously uses ultravio-
  let (UV)  radiation, ozone,  and hydrogen peroxide to oxidize
  dissolved  organic  contaminants found in groundwater  or
  wastewater. Under the SITE Program,  the Ultrox technology
  demonstration was  conducted  at the Lorentz  Barrel and
  Drum (LB&D) site,  San  Jose,  California, in  February and
  March of  1989. During the demonstration, the Ultrox system
  achieved volatile organic compound  (VOC) removals greater
  than  90  percent  The majority  of VOCs were removed
  through chemical oxidation. However,  stripping also contrib-
  uted  toward removal of a few VOCs, such as 1,1,1-trichlor-
  oethane  (1,1,1-TCA) and 1,1-dichloroethane (1,1-DCA). The
  treated  groundwater met  the applicable  National Pollutant
  Discharge  Elimination System (NPDES) standards for dis-
  charge  into a local  waterway.  In addition, there were  no
  harmful air emissions  to  the atmosphere from  the Ultrox
  system, which is equipped with an off-gas treatment unit.
  Specifications:   Sponsored by  Environmental  Protection
  Agency,  Cincinnati,  OH.  Risk Reduction  Engineering  Lab.
  79p.
  Subject  index keywords: Water treatment, Waste water,
  Ground  water,  Ultrox technology, Technology assessment,
  Remedial action, Superfund.
                                                                                                               261

-------
if Ff  ' ' :  limn 1!.
TECHNOLOGY PQUCY& ADMINISTRATION:
Miscellaneous Policy & Program Documents
 1365  Use of a Fourier Transform Spectrometer as a
   Remote Sensor at Superfund Sites
   Order Number PB91-199844CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
   Northrop Services, Inc., Research Triangle Park, NC.; MDA
   Scientific, Inc., Norcrpss, GA.**ManTech Environmental
   Technology, Inc., Research Triangle Park,
   NO.* Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle
   Park, NC. Atmospheric Research and  Exposure Assessment
   Lab; 1991
   A Fourier transform  infrared  remote  sensor (FTIR-RS) was
   used to measure chemical emissions at the Shaver's Farm
   Superfund site in northwestern Georgia. The system was bis-
   tatic with a source/receiver at one end of a 250 m path and
   a retroreflector at the other end. The source/receiver was a
   Nicole] Model 730 FJIR system coupled to a telescope with
   the appropriate  transfer optics. The average concentrations
   of target gases along the path are inferred by matching field
   spectra with reference spectra of precisely measured quanti-
   ties qf the target  gases. Measurements indicated that ben-
   zonilrle and benzaldehyde concentrations  at the site were
   lower than the FTIR-RS detection limits of 70 and 16 ppm-m,
   respectively. Background IR radiation was successfully elimi-
   nated by modulating the IR beam before it was transmitted
   along the path. Quality assurance measurements to establish
   the  precision and  accuracy  of known gas burdens (ppm-m)
   were carried out using a 15-cm cell containing high concen-
   trations of several  gases.
   Specifications: Prepared in cooperation with MDA Scientif-
   ic, Ina, Norcrpss, GA., and ManTech  Environmental Technol-
   ogy,  Inc., Research  Triangle Park, NC. Sponsored by Envi-
   ronmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle  Park, NC.
   Atmospheric Research and Exposure Assessment Lab.  15p.
   Subject index  keywords:  Air pollution  detection,  Remote
   sensing, Superfund,  Waste disposal,  Fourier transform spec-
   trometers.
 1366   Use of Electrokinetics for Hazardous Waste Site
   Remediation
   Order Number PB91-171694CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
   Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk
   Reduction Engineering Lab.; PEER Consultants, Inc., Dayton,
   OH; 01990
   The S'uperfund  Innovative Technology Evaluation (SITE) pro-
   gram was authorized as part of the 1986 amendments to the
   Superfund legislation. It represents a joint effort between the
   U.S. EPA's Office of Research and Development and Office
   of Solid Waste and Emergency Response. The program is
   designed to assist and encourage the development of waste
   treatment technologies that  would contribute to more solu-
   tions to  our hazardous  waste problems.  Recently, EPA,
   through the SITE program, issued  a work assignment to
   assess the 'state-of-the-art' of electrokinetically enhanced
   contaminant removal from soils. Prior research efforts, both
   laborator and  field, have demonstrated  the electo-osmosis
   has the potential to be effective in facilitating the removal of
   certain types of hazardous wastes from soils. Particularly en-
   couraging results  have been achieved with inorganics in fine
   grained soils where more traditional  removal alternatives are
   less effective. Although the results of various studies suggest
   that electrokinetics is a promising technology, further testing
   is needed at both the laboratory and field levels to fully de-
   velop  this technology for site remediation. A conceptual test
   program is presented based on best available data which in-
   corporates system design and operating parameters used in
  previous applications of this technology in the use of electro-
  kinetics treatment as a remediation technique at hazardous
  waste sites. (Copyright (c)  1990-Air & Waste Management
  Association.
  Specifications:  Pub. in Jnl. of Air Waste Management Asso-
  ciation, v40 n12 p1670-1676  Dec 90.  Prepared  in coopera-
  tion with PEER Consultants, Inc., Dayton, OH. 9p.
  Subject index keywords:  Superfund, Hazardous materials,
  Remedial action, Soil contamination, Electrodynamics.

1367  Use of 'Selenastrum capricornutum' to Assess the
  Toxicity Potential of Surface and  Ground Water
  Contamination Caused by Chromium Waste
  Order Number PB90-108242CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
  Corvallis Environmental Research Lab., OR.; Northrop
  Services, Inc., Corvallis, OR; c1988
  United Chrome Products,  Inc.  (Corvallis,  OR), discharged
  liquid  chrome-plating wastes into  an  on-site dry well from
  1957 to 1977. Samples were  collected from ground and sur-
  face waters during February and December 1984 and evalu-
  ated for toxicity potential using 96-h Selenastrum capricornu-
  tum bioassays.  Bioassays of the   February samples were
  used to calculated predicted  EC50 values  for different chro-
  mium  concentrations, which  were  then compared  with  the
  chromium concentrations  measured in the December sam-
  ples and with the results  of  S. capricornutum bioassays on
  these samples. An  excellent correlation was obtained  be-
  tween the predicted  EC50 values and the actual  bioassay re-
  sponse values for ground water and drainage ditch samples.
  However, no  correlation was obtained with the off-site sur-
  face water samples. These results  could not be  explained by
  changes in chromium  valence,  and they  demonstrate that,
  even in simple systems, toxicity cannot readily  be predicted
  based solely on chemical analysis.
  Specifications:   Pub. in  Environmental  Toxicology  and
  Chemistry, v7 p35-39 1988. Prepared  in cooperation  with
  Northrop Services, Inc., Corvallis, OR. 7p.
  Subject index keywords: Chromium plating, Water pollution,
  Toxicity,  Industrial wastes, Selenastrum capricornutum.

 1368  Using the DNA Alkaline Unwinding Assay to Detect
  DMA Damage in Laboratory and Environmentally
  Exposed Cells and Tissues
  Order Number PB90-245770CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
  Science Applications International Corp., Narragansett, Rl.;
  Environmental Research Lab., Narragansett, Rl;  c1990
  The DNA alkaline unwinding assay is being evaluated for use
  in the detection of DNA damage in marine animals exposed
  to  environmental  pollutants. In preliminary work,  DNA  un-
  winding  methods were used with in  vitro  cell systems to
  demonstrate  DNA strand breaks. Cultured  mammalian fibrob-
  lasts and sperm from marine fish and invertebrates (Pseudo-
  pleuronectes, Arbacia and Mytilus) showed concentration-de-
  pendent increases  in  DNA  strand breaks after brief expo-
  sures to alkylating  agents.  DNA  unwinding methods were
  also used on DNA extracted from marine animals injected
  with genotoxicants  and from animals exposed  in situ at an
  estuarine site. Gills from  blue  mussels caged at the New
  Bedford Harbor Superfund Site (MA, USA) highly contaminat-
  ed with  many organic (e.g. PCBs) and inorganic contami-
  nants, were  also examined. A significant increase  in  DNA
  strand breaks was seen in gill  tissues  of animals held in the
  contaminated site for as  little as  3 days. Although not as
  262

-------
                                                               TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION; Air
                                                                                                    Technologies
  severe, an increase in strand breaks was also seen in ani-
  mals held at the control site for 28 days. (Copyright (c) 1990,
  Elsevier Science Publishers Ltd., England.)
  Specifications: Pub. in Marine Environmental Research 28,
  P333-337 1989. Sponsored by Environmental Research Lab.,
  Narragansett, Rl. 6p.
  Subject  index keywords: Marine biology, DNA unwinding
  proteins, Water pollution effects(Animals), DNA damage, Mu-
  tagenicity tests.

1369 Vendor Information Form to be Completed for
  Participation in the: Vendor Information System for
  Innovative Treatment Technologies (VISITT)
  Order Number PB91-921289CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Emergency and Remedial Response; Jun 91
  The Vendor  Information System  for  Innovative Treatment
  Technologies (VISITT)  is an automated database developed
  for use by those responsible for site remediation,  including
  state,  federal, and  private  sector professionals responsible
  for site cleanup of  the nation's hazardous waste sites. The
  Technology Innovation Office (TIO) and the  Office of Solid
  Waste  and Emergency Response (OSWER) is  conducting
  the Invitation for Submittals for developers and providers of
  innovative treatment technologies.  The information submitted
  will be  entered into the database. EPA expects that VISITT
  will be  used as a tool to screen technologies for remediation
  of these sites.
  Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
  posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
  and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
  paper copy or microfiche. 48p.
  Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste treat-
  ment, Superfund.

1370  Vendor Information System for Innovative
  Treatment Technologies (VISITT). Number 1
  Order Number PB92-224716CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Jun 92
  The bulletin highlights  facts about the Vendor Information
  System for Innovative Treatment Technologies (VISITT). This
  database contains information on vendors of innovative tech-
  nologies to treat ground water in situ, soils, sludges and sedi-
  ments.  It includes technologies at all  stages of develop-
  ment-bench, pilot,  or  full.  VISITT provides  environmental
  professionals with rapid access to  up-to-date  information on
  155 innovative technologies and the 97 companies that offer
  them. Once the database  identifies the technologies  and
  vendors meeting the user's requirements, the user can then
  review such information as available equipment, performance
  data, and experience.
  Specifications: See also PB91-921289. 8p.
  Subject index keywords:  Ground water, Soils, Pollution
  control,  Remedial action, Information systems.
TECHNOLOGY  PROGRAM

IMPLEMENTATION: Air Technologies

1371   Air Stripping of Aqueous Solutions. Engineering
  Bulletin
  Order Number PB92-180033CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Emergency and Remedial Response; Oct 91
  Air stripping is a means to transfer contaminants from aque-
  ous solutions to air. Contaminants are not destroyed by air
  stripping but are physically separated from the aqueous solu-
  tions. Contaminant vapors are transferred into the air stream
  and, if necessary, can  be treated by incineration, adsorption,
  or oxidation. Most frequently, contaminants are collected in
  carbon adsorption systems and then treated or destroyed in
  this concentrated form. The concentrated contaminants may
  be recovered, incinerated for  waste  heat  recovery, or  de-
  stroyed by other treatment technologies. Generally, air strip-
  ping is used as one in a series  of unit operations,and  can
  reduce the overall  cost  for  managing a particular  site. Air
  stripping is applicable  to volatile and semivolatile  organic
,  compounds. It is not applicable for treating metals and inor-
  ganic compounds. The bulletin provides information  on  the
  technology applicability, the technology limitations, a  descrip-
  tion of the technology,  the types of residuals produced,  site
  requirements,  the latest performance data, the status of the
  technology, and  sources of further information.
  Specifications:  See also PB88-106166 and  DE89015653.
  9p,
  Subject index keywords: Liquid wastes, Waste  treatment,
  Air pollution control, Water pollution control,  Air stripping.

1372  Air/Superfund National Technical Guidance Series.
  Superfund Air Pathway Analyses Review Criteria
  Checklists
  Order Number PB90-182544CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
  Radian Corp., Austin, TX.; Environmental Protection Agency,
  Research Triangle Park, NC. Office of Air Quality Planning
  and Standards; 17 Jan 90
  The EPA has  responsibility for assessment and  cleanup of
  superfund  sites. Because air  emissions pose a potential
  human health  risk at these sites, the EPA has developed a
  set of procedures for evaluating these risks. The four check-
  lists presented provide  a systematic approach for air review-
  ers to apply the air pathway assessment procedures. The
  background, purpose, and application  of the  checklists are
  discussed.
  Specifications:   See  also  PB90-113374,  PB89-18.0053,
  PB89-180061 and PB90-113382. Sponsored by Environmen-
  tal Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park,  NC. Office of
  Air Quality Planning and Standards. 63p.
  Subject index keywords: Waste  disposal, Hazardous mate-
  rials,  Risk  assessment,  Path  of pollutants,  Air pollution
  effects(Humans), Superfund program, Air pollution sampling.
                                                                                                             263

-------
TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Air
Technologies
1373  Air/Superfund National Technical Guidance Study
  Series. Air Emissions from Area Sources: Estimating Soil
  and Soli-Gas Sample Number Requirements
  Order Number PB93-173995CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
  Pacific Environmental Services, Inc., Herndon, VA.;
  Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park,
  NC. Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards; Mar 93
  The document  provides guidance regarding the necessary
  number of soil  gas or soil samples needed to estimate air
  emissions from  area sources. The Manual relies heavily on
  statistical methods discussed in  Appendix C of Volume II  of
  Air/Superfund National  Technical  Guidance  Study  Series
  (EPA  1990) and Chapter 9 of SW-846  (EPA 1986). The tech-
  niques in the manual are based on recognizing the inhom-
  geniety  of an area,  by  observation or screening samples,
  before samples are taken. Each of the identified zones are
  then sampled, using random sampling  techniques, and statis-
  tics calculated  separately for each zone before combining
  the statistics to provide an estimate for the entire area. The
  statistical techniques presented may also be used to analyze
  other types  of  data  and provide measures such as mean,
  variance, and standard deviation. The methods presented in
  the Manual are based on small sample methods. Application
  of the methods to data which are appropriately analyzed  by
  large  sample methods or to data which is not normally dis-
  tributed will give erroneous results.
  Specifications: See also PB90-270588. Sponsored by Envi-
  ronmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, NC.
  Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards. 52p.
  Subject index keywords: Air pollution sampling, Soil gases,
  Soil surveys, Sampling, Hazardous materials.
 1374  Air/Superfund National Technical Guidance Study
  Series. Air Stripper Design Manual
  Order Number PB91-125997CDH, price: PC A06/MF A01
  Research Triangle Inst., Research Triangle Park, NC.;
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Emergency and Remedial Response; May 90
  A computer model package 'ASPAIR' was developed in the
  project  to describe the air stripping process along with proc-
  esses for controlling the air emissions. The package is inte-
  grated with a commercially available process simulator called
  ASPEN to design and cost  an air stripper and emission con-
  trol system  for specific  applications. The applicability of the
  ASPAIR model package was demonstrated through several
  case studies which highlighted the effect of important param-
  eters such as, Henry's Law constant,  gas to liquid ratio, VOC
  removal efficiency, and  wastewater throughput. The results
  of these case  studies are presented in a graphical form to
  allow quick 'short-cut' estimates of the performance and cost
  of an air stripper and associated air emissions control  units.
  Two  figures are  provided in the manual that illustrate the
  capital  and annuaiized  costs as a function  of wastewater
  flow  rate and Henry's Law constant  for  a desired VOC  re-
  moval efficiency of 90%. Two additional figures are provided
  that illustrate a similar cost correlation for a desired VOC re-
   moval rate efficiency of  99%. The manual also provides cap-
  ital and annuaiized costs graphs for catalytic oxidation and
   carbon adsorption units used to control the emissions from
   air strippers.
   Specifications: See also PB90-207317. Sponsored by Envi-
   ronmental Protection Agency,  Washington,  DC.  Office  of
   Emergency and Remedial Response.  112p.
  Subject index keywords: Manuals, Computerized simula-
  tion, Strippers, Superfund, Remedial action, Water pollution
  control equipment, Volatile organic compounds.

1375  Air/Superfund National Technical Guidance Study
  Series: Applicability of Open Path Monitors for
  Superfund
  Order Number PB93-138154CDH, price: PC A07/MF A02
  Radian Corp., Austin, TX.; Environmental Protection Agency,
  Research Triangle Park, NC. Office of Air Quality Planning
  and Standards; May 92
  The  document  provides  guidance  on the  applicability of
  Open Path Monitors (OPMs) for ambient air monitoring at Su-
  perfund sites. The relatively limited use of these devices for
  ambient air monitoring has led to many questions concerning
  their applicability, reliability, and sensitivity for these applica-
  tions. Information is provided as to the general capabilities of
  OPMs. The compounds that each method is capable of de-
  tecting are tabulated. The detection limits of each type of in-
  strument are discussed  and compared to the detection limits
  achievable  using  conventional  techniques  such  as EPA
  Method TO-14 as well as to short-term and long-term health-
  based action  levels. The data turnaround time and the ability
  to resolve temporal variations in emissions are also  dis-
  cussed.
  Specifications:   See  also  PB89-180061, PB89-180053,
  PB90-113382 and PB90-113374. Sponsored by Environmen-
  tal Protection Agency, Research Triangle  Park,  NC.  Office  of
  Air Quality Planning and Standards. 136p.
  Subject index keywords:  Superfund, Remedial action, Path
  of pollutants,  Air pollution monitors, Hazardous materials,
  Open Path Monitors.
 1376   Air/Superfund National Technical Guidance Study
  Series. Comparisons of Air Stripper Simulations and
  Field Performance Data
  Order Number PB90-207317CDH, price: PC A06/MF A01
  PEI Associates, Inc., Cincinnati, OH.; Environmental
  Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, NC. Office of Air
  Quality Planning and Standards; Feb 90
  One of the more common problems noted at Superfund sites
  is the contamination of  ground water by volatile organic com-
  pounds (VOCs). One remedial  alternative that is used  to
  reduce or remove the VOC contamination from water is air
  stripping  in a tower that uses either packing media or trays.
  The ability to strip a compound from the water depends on
  several factors, including the air/water ratio, the packing  or
  tray type, and the Henry's Law value for the compounds of
  interest.  The  objective  is to remove the VOCs  from the
  water. When being considered for remediation  purposes, the
  air stripper design should be evaluated for removal efficiency
  and cost of operation. The purpose of the project was to col-
  lect available design  and  operating  data  on  operating  air
  strippers and to input the design and operating parameters
  into the ASPEN simulator through a user interface program.
  The results from the ASPEN simulator were compared to the
  operating data gathered for the sites to  determine the  rela-
  tive accuracy of the ASPEN model  results when compared
  with the actual performance data.
  Specifications:  See also PB90-182544.  Sponsored by Envi-
  ronmental Protection Agency,  Research Triangle Park, NC.
  Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards. 112p.
 264

-------
                                                               TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Air
                                                                                                     Technologies
  Subject index keywords: Ground water, Computerized sim-
  ulation, Strippers, Superfund program, Remedial action, Vola-
  tile organic compounds, Water pollution control equipment.

1377  Air/Superfund National Technical Guidance Study
  Series: Compilation of Information on Real-Time Air
  Monitoring for Use at Superfund Sites
  Order Number PB93-199222CDH, price: PC A05/MF A02
  Radian Corp., Austin, TX.; Environmental Protection Agency,
  Dallas, TX. Region VI; May 93
  The report summarizes the  results of a U.S. Environmental
  Protection Agency  (EPA)-sponsored  study  to compile and
  evaluate  information on commercially-available real-time air
  monitoring equipment for use at Superfund sites. In the docu-
  ment, real-time (RT) and near real-time (NRT) monitors are
  broadly defined as those instruments or methods that pro-
  vide information either instantaneously or within a relatively
  short time period (i.e., <30 minutes). The objectives of the
  study were to review the available literature on real-time (RT)
  air monitoring; compile a comprehensive list of real-time and
  near real-time (NRT)  air sampling techniques, equipment,
  and vendors; contact vendors and users to  collect informa-
  tion on the technical specifications of their applicable instru-
  ments; and prepare a guidance document that summarizes
  the results of the study. The  available literature was reviewed
  to  identify the most current methods for real-time or  near
  real-time  measurement of ambient air concentrations of toxic
  pollutants commonly found at Superfund sites.
  Specifications:  Sponsored  by Environmental  Protection
  Agency, Dallas, TX. Region VI. 99p.
  Subject index keywords: Superfund,  Hazardous  materials,
  Waste disposal, Air pollution monitors, Real-time air moni-
  tors.

1378  Air/Superfund National Technical Guidance Study
  Series. Contingency Plans  at Superfund Sites Using Air
  Monitoring
  Order Number PB91-102129CDH, price: PC A06/MF A01
  PEI Associates, Inc., Cincinnati, OH.; Environmental
  Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of Emergency
  and Remedial Response; Sep 90
  Air emissions from remedial or removal activities  at Super-
  fund  sites can potentially have a significant impact on  the
  health arid safety of the individuals living and working around
  the site. Contingency planning,  as defined in the document,
  encompasses the air program established to protect offsite
  populations.  Monitors for this purpose are usually located at
  the site perimeter or within  the community. The purpose of
  the document  is to: (1) illustrate  contingency air monitoring
  with examples from past projects, and (2)  describe how a
  contingency air monitoring program may be established. The
  document is illustrative  in nature  because the application of
  this type  of monitoring is not consistently prescribed  in rules
  and regulations, but is based on professional judgment ap-
  plied in an analysis of individual sites and particular  circum-
  stances.
  Specifications: See also PB90-207317. Sponsored by Envi-
  ronmental Protection Agency,  Washington,  DC.  Office of
  Emergency and Remedial Response. 107p.
  Subject index keywords: Guidelines,  Superfund,  Air pollu-
  tion monitoring, Contingency planning.
1379  Air/Superfund National Technical Guidance Study
  Series. Database of Emission Rate Measurement
  Projects
  Order Number PB91-222059CDH, price: PC A06/MF A02
  Radian Corp., Austin, TX.; Environmental Protection Agency,
  Washington, DC. Office of Emergency and Remedial
  Response; Jun 91
  A compilation and evaluation of Volatile Organic Compound
  (VOC) emission rate data was performed. The three primary
  objectives were (1) to determine typical averages and ranges
  of emissions for various types of sources; (2) to determine
  the degree of correlation between emission rate results from
  different sampling methods; and (30 to examine the effects
  of different  variables on  measured emission  rates. Emission
  rate data are presented for 33 studies covering 13 types of
  emission sources. The sources include landfills, surface im-
  poundments, waste water treatment systems, leaking  under-
  ground storage tanks, soil piles and landfarms. The emission
  rate data were obtained by using the Emission Isolation  Flux
  Chamber, Downhole Emissions Isolation Flux Chamber,  the
  Concentration Profile method and the  Transect method.  For
  each source, the total non-methane hydrocarbon and ben-
  zene emission rates  are reported along with three other com-
  pounds that had the highest emission rate. Source concen-
  tration data  (e.g. concentration in soil or waste water)  are
  also  reported  for comparison to the measured emission
  rates.
  Specifications:  Sponsored  by Environmental Protection
  Agency, Washington, DC. Office of Emergency and Remedial
  Response. 119p.
  Subject index keywords: Superfund,  Air pollution sampling,
  Emission factors, Waste disposal, Sewage treatment, Land
  pollution.

1380  Air/Superfund  National Technical Guidance Study
  Series. Development of Example Procedures for
  Evaluating the Air Impacts of Soil Excavation Associated
  with Superfund Remedial Actions
  Order Number PB90-255662CDH, price: PC A05/MF A01
  PEI Associates,  Inc., Cincinnati, OH.; Radian Corp., Austin,
  TX.*Environmental Protection Agency,  Research Triangle
  Park, NC. Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards; Jul
  90
  The purpose of the project was  to identify  and define  the
  computation requirements or estimating the air impacts from
  the remediation of Superfund  sites. Two example sites  em-
  ploying soil excavation were selected  because they repre-
  sent  a complex emission  source. The  procedures  for  the
  evaluation of the ambient impacts were divided into several
  subtasks. These included site characterization,  selection of
  remedial alternatives, definition of remedial activities, estima-
  tion  of emission rates  for each remedial activity, determina-
  tion of ambient concentrations fromdispersion modeling,  and
  evaluation of carcinogenic and noncarcinogenic risks based
  on dispersion modeling results. The calculation  of emission
  rates were used to estimate ambient impacts through disper-
  sion models. The purpose was to outline a set of procedures
  that could be used, with  existing tools, to assist in the eval-
  uation of air-pathway effects.
  Specifications:  Also pub. as Radian Corp., Austin, TX. rept.
  no.  DCN-90-203-080-61-02.  Prepared  in cooperation  with
  Radian Corp., Austin, TX. Sponsored by Environmental  Pro-
                                                                                                               265

-------
TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Air
technologies
  tectfon Agency, Research Triangle Park,  NC. Office of Air
  Quality Planning and Standards. 80p.
  Subject Index keywords: Soils,  Excavation, Air  pollution,
  Remedial  action,  Volatile  organic  compounds,  Emission
  rates.

1381   Air/Superfund National Technical Guidance  Study
  Series. Emission Factors for Superfund Remediation
  Technologies
  Order Number PB9,1:19.Q975CDH, price: PC A05/MF A01
  Radian Corp., Austin, TX.; Environmental Protection  Agency,
  Washington, DC. Office of Emergency and Remedial
  Response; Mar 91
  The  report contains procedures and example calculations for
  estimating air emissions that occur from treating contaminat-
  ed material at Superfund sites. Emission factors for six treat-
  ment technologies are presented. These are: (1) Thermal
  Treatment, (2) Air Stripping, (3) Soil Vapor  Extraction,  (4) So-
  lidification and Stabilization, (5) Physical and Chemical Treat-
  ment, and (6) Biotreatment and Land Treatment. For each of
  the six technologies, a literature review was conducted to de-
  velopa flow diagram and identify emission points, as  well  as
  to analyze available air emissions data. For most of the tech-
  nologies examined, emission factors were based on available
  data  as  well as  assumed  'typical' operating  conditions.
  Where possible, however, emission  factors were presented
  on actual operating data from the site studies. Emission fac-
  tors  are  presented for volatile  organic compounds  (VOC),
  metals, particulate  matter, SO2,  NOx, CO,  HCI, and HF. The
  report also  contains  an extensive  bibliography related  to
  waste treatment technologies.
  Specifications:   Sponsored  by  Environmental Protection
  Agency, Washington, DC. Office  of Emergency and  Remedial
  Response. 91 p.
  Subject index keywords: Superfund, Emission factors, Re-
  medial action, Waste treatment, Air pollution, Superfund.

1382   Atr/Superfund National Technical Guidance  Study
  Series: Estimation of Air Impacts for Air Stripping of
  Contaminated Water
  Order Number PB91-211888CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
  Radian Corp., Austin, TX.; Environmental Protection  Agency,
  Washington, DC. Office of Emergency and  Remedial
  Response; May 91
  Analysis of the air impacts associated with the alternatives to
  clearing  up  Superfund sites is frequently  required for  plan-
  ning purposes prior to actual cleanup. Such analyses depend
  on estimates rather than on field measurements. The report
  provides  procedures  for estimating the emissions and ambi-
  ent air concentrations associated with air stripping - a widely
  used technique  for  removing volatile organic compounds
  (VOC) from contaminated water.  Procedures are  given  to
  evaluate  the effect of the concentration of contaminants in
  water, the stripping efficiency and the stripping rate  on the
  emission rates and on the ambient air concentrations at se-
  lected distances from the air stripper. Henry's Law constants
  are |5fov!ded for over 130 compounds to assist in  determin-
  ing stripping efficiencies. Health-based action  levels are also
  provided  for the 130 compounds for comparison to the esti-
  mated ambient air  concentrations. Action levels are also ex-
  pressed in terms of water concentrations using conservative
  estimates of emissions and dispersion.
  Specifications: See also PB91-190975. Sponsored by Envi-
  ronmental  Protection Agency,  Washington, DC.  Office of
  Emergency and Remedial Response. 36p.
  Subject index  keywords:  Superfund,  Remedial  action,
  Water pollution control, Air pollution effects(Humans), Toxic
  substances, Public health.

1383  Air/Superfund National Technical Guidance Study
  Series: Estimation of Air Impacts for Soil Vapor
  Extraction (SVE) Systems
  Order Number  PB92-143676CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
  Radian Corp., Austin, TX.; Environmental Protection Agency,
  Research Triangle Park, NC. Office of Air Quality Planning
  and Standards; Jan 92
  The  U.S.  Environmental Protection Agency's Office of Air
  Quality Planning and Standards and the Regional Air Offices
  have been given  the responsibility to  evaluate air impacts
  from Superfund sites. The  report provides procedures for
  roughly estimating the ambient air concentrations associated
  with  soil vapor extraction (SVE). The  procedures for  SVE
  systems are analogous to procedures  for air strippers that
  have previously been published. SVE is also known as soil
  venting, vacuum extraction, aeration, or  in-situ volatilization. It
  is a widely used technique for removing volatile organic com-
  pound (VOC) vapors from contaminated soil. Procedures are
  given to evaluate the effect of the concentration of the  con-
  taminants in the soil-gas and the extraction rate on the emis-
  sion rates  and  on the ambient air concentrations at selected
  distances from  the SVE system.
  Specifications:  See also PB89-159396,  PB91-168476, and
  PB91-211888.   Sponsored  by   Environmental  Protection
  Agency, Research Triangle  Park,  NC.  Office of  Air Quality
  Planning and Standards. 44p.
  Subject index keywords: Air pollution abatement, Environ-
  mental impacts,  Hazardous  materials,  Superfund, Remedial
  action, Soil vapor extraction, Volatile organic compounds.

1384  Air Superfund National Technical Guidance Study
  Series. Estimation of Air Impacts for the Excavation of
  Contaminated Soil
  Order Number  PB92-171925CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
  Radian Corp., Austin, TX.; Environmental Protection Agency,
  Research Triangle Park, NC. Office of Air Quality Planning
  and Standards; 18 Mar 92
  Analysis of the air impacts associated  with cleaning up Su-
  perfund sites is frequently required prior to actual cleanup.
  Such  analyses depend  on  estimates  rather than on  field
  measurements. This report provides procedures for estimat-
  ing the emissions of volatile organic compounds (VOC) and
  the  ambient air concentrations associated with the  excava-
  tion of contaminated soil. Excavation is  an integral part of
  any Superfund site remediation that involves removal or ex-
  situ treatment such as incineration, thermal desorption, biore-
  mediation, or solidification/stabilization. The report contains
  procedures to evaluate the effect of the concentration of the
  contaminants in the soil and the excavation rate on the emis-
  sion  rates  and  on the ambient air concentrations  at selected
  distances from the excavation site. Health-based ambient air
  action levels are also provided for comparison to the estimat-
  ed ambient concentrations.
  Specifications:  See also PB92-171917  and PB92-171909.
  Sponsored by  Environmental  Protection  Agency, Research
266

-------
                                                               TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Air
                                                                                                     Technologies
  Triangle Park, NO. Office of Air Quality Planning and Stand-
  ards. 59p.
  Subject index keywords: Superfund, Air pollution sampling,
  Toxic substances, Waste management, Remedial action.

1385  Air/Superfund National Technical Guidance Study
  Series: Estimation of Air Impacts from Area Sources of
  Particulate Matter Emissions at Superfund Sites
  Order Number PB93-215648CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
  Radian Corp., Austin, TX.; Environmental Protection Agency,
  Research Triangle Park, NC. Office of Air Quality Planning
  and Standards; Apr 93
  The report provides procedures for estimating the ambient
  air concentrations associated with emissions of particulate
  matter from soils handling operations at Superfund sites. Ma-
  terials handling  operations are necessary at any site where
  ex-situ treatment is  performed. In addition, soils handling op-
  erations, such as excavation or grading, are frequently per-
  formed as part  of site preparation. Procedures are given to
  evaluate the effect  of  the  handling  rate  and contaminant
  concentration on the emission rates and on the ambient air
  concentrations   at selected  distances from the treatment
  area. Health-based ambient air action levels are also provid-
  ed for comparison to the estimated ambient concentrations.
  Specifications:  See also PB93-215655. Sponsored by Envi-
  ronmental  Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, NC.
  Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards. 44p.
  Subject index keywords: Superfund,  Remediation, Ambient
  air quality,  Particulates.

1386  Air/Superfund  National Technical Guidance Study
  Series: Evaluation of Short-Term Air Action Levels for
  Superfund Sites
  Order Number PB93-200913CDH, price: PC A14/MF A03
  Radian Corp., Austin, TX.; Environmental Protection Agency,
  Washington, DC. Office of Emergency and Remedial
  Response; May 93
  The report summarizes  the  results  of an EPA-sponsored
  study to compile and evaluate information  on  short-term air
  action levels (AALs)  used at Superfund sites. Because there
  is no simple or  widely accepted method for estimating the
  risks of short-term exposures, there are no  uniformly accept-
  ed short-term air action  levels for emissions from Superfund
  sites. Air action  levels have been established in a variety of
  ways, depending on waste types at the site, state guidelines,
  the potential for air  emissions, cost, and  individual  project
  manager  discretion.  State  and local  guidelines are  often
  based on occupational exposure limits (e.g., Threshold Limit
  Values) that have been divided by a safety factor to account
  for the  differences  in population and exposure of workers
  and residents. Some states are adopting other approaches,
  including the use of U.S. EPA-developed  inhalation  Refer-
  ence Concentrations  (RfCs).
  Specifications:   Sponsored by  Environmental  Protection
  Agency, Washington, DC. Office of Emergency and Remedial
  Response. 305p.
  Subject  index  keywords:  Air pollution monitoring,  Super-
  fund,  Hazardous materials, Waste disposal, Air action levels,
  Short term exposure.
 1387  Air/Superfund National Technical Guidance Study
  Series. Guideline for Predictive Baseline Emissions
  Estimation Procedures for Superfund Sites
  Order Number PB92-171909CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
  Environmental Quality Management, Inc., Durham, NC.;
  Environmental Protection Agency, New York.  Region II; Jan
  92
  The purpose of the project was to develop a guideline for
  using the preferred EPA-approved predictive models to esti-
  mate air pathway  exposure  point concentrations for input to
  Superfund site Baseline Risk Assessments. The document
  provides the sequential series of steps necessary to accom-
  plish the  baseline air pathway analysis by predictive means.
  Specifications:  See also PB92-171917, PB92-171925 and
  PB92-143676.  Sponsored  by   Environmental  Protection
  Agency, New York. Region II. 30p.
  Subject index keywords: Air pollution sampling, Superfund,
  Waste management, Remedial action, Toxic substances.

 1388   Air/Superfund National Technical  Guidance Study
  Series. Models for Estimating Air Emission Rates from
  Superfund Remedial Actions
  Order Number PB93-186807CDH, price: PC A08/MF A02
  Radian Corp., Austin, TX.;  Environmental  Protection Agency,
  Washington,  DC. Office of Emergency and Remedial
  Response; Mar 93
  The report is a compendium of models  (equations) for esti-
  mating air emissions from Superfund sites undergoing reme-
  diation. These models predict emission  rates of volatile  or-
  ganic compounds  (VOC's) and particulate matter (PM) from
  both area and point sources. The following remedial process-
  es are covered: air stripping,  soil  vapor extraction, thermal
  desorption,  thermal destruction  (incineration),  excavation,
  dredging,  solidification/stabilization,  and   bioremediation.
  Emission estimation methods are also  presented for landfills,
  lagoons, and  spills/leaks/open waste  pits. The models con-
  tained in  the compendium will not accurately predict emis-
  sions for all possible scenarios.
  Specifications:    Sponsored  by  Environmental  Protection
  Agency, Washington, DC. Office of  Emergency and Remedial
  Response. 163p.
  Subject  index keywords:  Volatile  organic  compounds,
  Emissions, Air pollution control, Mathematical models, Super-
  fund.

1389  Air Superfund National Technical Guidance Study
  Series. Screening Procedures for Estimating the Air
  Impacts of Incineration at Superfund Sites
  Order Number PB92-171917CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
  International Technology Corp., Durham, NC.;  Environmental
  Protection Agency, New York. Region II; Feb 92
  The purpose of the project was to  develop screening proce-
  dures for estimating the air impacts of incineration at Super-
  fund sites. The document  outlines procedures for estimating
  uncontrolled  and controlled emission rates of hydrocarbons,
  particulate matter, metals, acid  gases and  other contami-
  nants as well as screening procedures for estimating ambient
  air concentrations of these contaminants. The document also
  provides screening evaluation procedures  for  compliance
  with  applicable  or relevant and  appropriate requirements
  (ARARs) and for health effects.
                                                                                                               267

-------
TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Air
Technologies
  Specifications:  See also PB92-171925 and PB92-171909.
  Sponsored by  Environmental Protection Agency,  New York.
  Region II. 70p.
  Subject index keywords: Air pollution sampling,  Superfund,
  Toxic substances, Waste management, Remedial action.

1390   Air/Superfund National Technical Guidance Study
  Series. Volume 1. Application of Air Pathway Analyses
  for Superfund Activities
  Order Number  P^B9g::113§74CDH, price: PC A06/MF A01
  NUS Cprp., Gaithersburg, MD.; Radian Corp., Sacramento,
  GA.*Environmental  Protection Agency, Research Triangle
  Park, NC, Office of  Air Quality Planning and Standards; Jul
  89
  The  report is  one  in a  series  of  manuals dealing with air
  pathway analysis at hazardous waste sites. The document
  was  developed for the  Office  of  Air Quality Planning and
  Standards in cooperation with the  Office of  Emergency and
  Remedial Response (Superfund). The document is an interim
  final  manual offering technical guidance for  use by a diverse
  audience including  EPA Air and  Superfund Regional  and
  Headquarters staff, State air and  Superfund program  staff,
  Federal and State remedial and removal contractors, and po-
  tentially responsible parties in analyzing air pathways at haz-
  ardous waste sites. The  manual provides for flexibility in tai-
  loring the  air pathway analysis to  the specific conditions  of
  each site.
  Specifications:  See also Volume 2,  PB89-180053. Prepared
  in cooperation with Radian Corp., Sacramento,  CA. Spon-
  sored by Environmental  Protection Agency, Research Trian-
  gle Park, NC.  Office of  Air Quality Planning and Standards.
  118p.
  Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Air pollution,
  Waste disposal.

1391   Air/Superfund National Technical Guidance Study
  Series. Volume 1.  Overview of Air Pathway Assessments
  for Superfund Sites (Revised)
  Ordern Number PB93;173987CDH, price: PC A05/MF A01
  Radian Corp., AustinJ TX.;' Environmental Protection Agency,
  Research Triangle  Park,  NC. Office of Air Quality Planning
  and  Standards; Npv 92
  The  document introduces and provides an overview of  air
  pathway assessments for Superfund sites.  The specific ob-
  jectives of the document are to (1)  introduce the basic ele-
  ments of air pathway assessments (APA) for Superfund sites;
  (2) identify and discuss the key issues related to APA work;
  and  (3) identify  the best sources of  published  information
  and  guidance  for each typical component of APA work. An
  APA is a systematic evaluation of the potential or actual  ef-
  fects on air quality of an emission source such as a Super-
  fund site.  The APA may involve modeling  or monitoring  to
  estimate these effects. The primary  components of  an APA
  are:  characterization of  air emission sources; determination
  of the effects of atmospheric processes such as transport
  and  dilution; and evaluation of the exposure potential  at  re-
  ceptors of interest.
  Specifications:  Supersedes PB90-113374. Sponsored  by
  Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park,
  NC. Office of Air Quality  Planning and Standards.  86p.
  Subject index keywords: Superfund, Environmental  expo-
  sure pathway, Risk assessment, Air pollution monitoring.
 268
1392  Air/Superfund National Technical Guidance Study
  Series. Volume 2. Estimation of Baseline Air Emissions
  at Superfund Sites (Revised)
  Order Number PB90-270588CDH, price: PC A17/MF A03
  Radian Corp., Austin, TX.; Environmental Protection Agency,
  Research Triangle Park, NC. Office of Air Quality Planning
  and Standards; Aug 90
  The  report presents  available  methods  for estimating air
  emissions  at Superfund hazardous waste sites prior to any
  remedial action. The report revises  and  expands an earlier
  report, Procedures For Conducting Air Pathway Analyses For
  Superfund Activities, Volume II,  Estimation  Of Baseline Air
  Emissions At Superfund Sites, EPA-450/1-89-002. The pur-
  pose of the report is to assist EPA  Air and  Superfund  staff,
  State Air Superfund program staff, Federal and State remedi-
  al and removal contractors, potentially  responsible parties
  and others in designing, conducting, and  reviewing  air path-
  way analyses at undisturbed hazardous waste sites.
  Specifications: See also PB89-180053. Sponsored by  Envi-
  ronmental Protection  Agency,  Research Triangle Park,  NC.
  Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards. 390p.
  Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Air pollution.

1393   Air/Superfund National Technical Guidance Study
  Series. Volume 4. Guidance for Ambient Air Monitoring
  at Superfund Sites (Revised)
  Order Number PB93-199214CDH, price: PC A08/MF A02
  Radian Corp., Austin, TX.; Environmental Protection Agency,
  Research Triangle Park, NC. Office of Air Quality Planning
  and Standards; May 93
  The  report presents the results of an EPA-sponsored study
  to develop guidance  for designing  and conducting ambient
  air monitoring at  Superfund sites. By law, all exposure  path-
  ways - including the air pathway - must be evaluated for
  every Superfund  site;  therefore, some level of ambient air
  monitoring usually is necessary at each  site. The document
  offers technical guidance for use by a diverse  audience, in-
  cluding EPA Air and  Superfund  Regional and Headquarters
  staff, State Air and Superfund staff, federal and state remedi-
  al and removal contractors, and potentially responsible par-
  ties. The manual is written to serve the needs  of individuals
  with various  levels of scientific training and experience in se-
  lecting and using ambient air monitoring methods in support
  of air pathway assessments.
  Specifications:  Supersedes PB90-113382. See  also PB89-
  180061. Sponsored by Environmental Protection Agency, Re-
  search Triangle Park, NC. Office of Air Quality Planning and
  Standards. 172p.
  Subject index keywords: Air pollution  monitoring, Hazard-
  ous materials, Waste disposal, Superfund.

1394  Air/Superfund National Technical Guidance Study
  Series. Volume 4. Procedures for  Dispersion Modeling
  and Air Monitoring for Superfund  Air Pathway Analysis
  Order Number PB90-113382CDH, price: PC A14/MF A01
  NUS Corp., Gaithersburg, MD.; Radian Corp., Sacramento,
  CA.*Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle
  Park, NC. Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards; Jul
  89
  The report is  one in  a series of manuals dealing with air
  pathway analysis at hazardous  waste sites. The document
  was developed for the  Office of Air Quality  Planning and
  Standards in cooperation with the Office of Emergency and

-------
                                                                TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Air
                                                                                                      Technologies
   Remedial Response (Superfund). The document is an interim
   final manual offering technical guidance for use by a diverse
   audience including  EPA Air and Superfund  Regional  and
   Headquarters staff,  State Air and Superfund program staff,
   Federal and State remedial and removal contractors, and po-
   tentially responsible parties in analyzing air pathways at haz-
   ardous waste sites. The manual provides for flexibility in tai-
   loring the air pathway analysis to the specific conditions of
   each site, the relative risk posed by this and  other pathways,
   and the program resource constraints.
   Specifications:  See also Volume 1, PB90-113374. Prepared
   in cooperation with Radian Corp.,  Sacramento, CA. Spon-
   sored by Environmental  Protection Agency, Research Trian-
   gle Park, NC. Office of Air Quality  Planning  and Standards.
   309p.
   Subject  index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste  dis-
   posal, Air pollution.

1395  Assessing Potential Indoor Air Impacts for
   Superfund Sites. Air/Superfund National Technical
   Guidance Study Series
   Order Number PB93-122257CDH, price: PC A09/MF A03
   Pacific Environmental Services, Inc., Herndon, VA.;
   Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park,
   NC. Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards; Sep 92
  The manual for assessing indoor air impacts was developed
  to be used for buildings proximate to Superfund sites. The
  procedures and methods may also be applied to other  as-
  sessments  of hazardous wastes and hazardous  materials.
  The purpose is to provide information on methods and tech-
  niques that can be used to  assess the potential or actual
  impact a Superfund site may have on the indoor air quality of
  buildings  proximate to  the site in order that the risk to  the
  occupants from this source may be estimated. The manual is
  designed to provide the tools needed to assist in the identifi-
  cation and resolution of indoor air quality concerns at Super-
  fund site.
  Specifications:    Sponsored by Environmental  Protection
  Agency,  Research Triangle  Park, NC. Office of Air Quality
  Planning and Standards. 196p.
  Subject index keywords: Superfund, Indoor air pollution, Air
  pollution  monitoring,  Hazardous materials,  Environmental
  impact assessments.

1396  Canister-Based Method for Monitoring Toxic VOCs
  in Ambient Air
  Order Number PB92-206432CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
  Environmental Protection  Agency, Research Triangle Park,
  NC. Atmospheric Research and Exposure Assessment Lab.;
  ManTech Environmental Technology, Inc., Research Triangle
  Park, NC.**BatteIle Memorial Inst., Columbus,
  OH.**Engineering Science, Gary, NC; c1991
  The availability of reliable, accurate and precise monitoring
  methods for toxic volatile organic compounds  (VOCs) is a
  primary need for  state and local  agencies addressing daily
  monitoring requirements related to odor complaints, fugitive
  emissions, and trend monitoring. The canister-based monitor-
  ing method  for VOCs is a viable and widely used approach
  that is based on research and evaluation performed  over the
  past several years. The activity has involved the testing of
  sample stability of VOCs in canisters and the design of time-
  integrative samplers. The development of procedures for
  analysis of samples in canisters, including the procedure for
  VOC preconcentration from whole air, the treatment of water
   vapor in the sample, and the selection of an appropriate ana-
   lytical finish  has  been accomplished. The  canister-based
   method was initially summarized in the EPA Compendium of
   Methods for the Determination of Toxic Organic Compounds
   in Ambient Air as Method TO-14.  Modifications and refine-
   ments are being added to Method TO-14 in order to obtain a
   Statement  of  Work for the  Superfund Contract Laboratory
   Program for  Air. The paper  discusses the developments
   leading to the current status of the canister-based method
   and provides a critique of the method using results obtained
   in EPA monitoring networks. (Copyright (c) 1991 - Air and
   Waste Management Association.)
   Specifications:  Pub.  in Jnl. of the Air and Waste Manage-
   ment Association, v41  n10 Oct 91. See also PB90-127374.
   Prepared in cooperation with ManTech Environmental Tech-
   nology, Inc., Research Triangle Park, NC., Battelle Memorial
   Inst., Columbus, OH.,   and Engineering Science, Gary, NC.
   13p.
   Subject index keywords: Volatile organic compounds, Air
   pollution monitoring, Air samplers, Cans, Air pollution detec-
   tion.

1397  Comparison of Organic Emissions from Hazardous
   Waste Incinerators versus the 1990 Toxic Release
   Inventory Air Releases
   Order Number PB94-112836CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
   Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk
   Reduction Engineering Lab; 1993
   Incineration is often the preferred technology for disposing of
   hazardous waste  and  remediating Superfund sites.  The ef-
  fective implementation  of the  technology is frequently imped-
  ed by strong  public opposition to hazardous  waste inciner-
  ation (HWI). One  of the reasons  cited  for this opposition is
  the perception that the emission of organics pose an unrea-
  sonable threat to human health. In order to put organic emis-
  sions in perspective, the mass of these emissions from the
  incineration of hazardous waste on a national scale has been
  estimated  using  'reasonable worst-case'  assumptions  and
  compared to the 1990  Toxics Release Inventory (TRI) air re-
  leases. Comparisons were made for 15 carcinogenic organic
  compounds and 17 non-carcinogenic  organic compounds.
  (Copyright (c) 1993 - Air and Waste Management Associa-
  tion.)
  Specifications: Pub. in Jnl.  of the Air and Waste Manage-
  ment Association, v43 p1374-1379 Oct 93. 8p.
  Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Incinerators,
  Organic compounds, Combustion products.

1398  Control of Air Emissions from Materials Handling
  during Remediation. Engineering Bulletin
  Order Number PB92-180041CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Emergency and Remedial Response; Oct 91
  The bulletin presents an overview  discussion  on the impor-
  tance of and methods  for controlling emissions into the air
  from  materials handling processes at  Superfund or other
  hazardous waste sites.  It also describes several techniques
  used for dust and vapor suppression that have been  applied
  at Superfund sites. The bulletin provides  information on the
  applicability of air emission controls for materials handling at
  Superfund sites, limitations of  the current systems, a descrip-
  tion of the control  methods that have  found  application to
  date, site requirements, a summary of the performance expe-
                                                                                                               269

-------
TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Air
Technologies
  rience, the status of the existing techniques and identification
  of future development expectations, and sources of addition-
  al information.
  Specifications:  See also PB85-124881 and PB90-113374.
  9p.
  Subject index keywords: Air  pollution  control,  Materials
  handling, Remedial action, Waste management,  Hazardous
  materials.
1399  Control of Air Emissions from Superfund Air
  Strippers at Superfund Groundwater Sites
  Order Number PB90-272667CDH, price:  PC A02/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Emergency and Remedial Response; 15 Jun 89
  The directive establishes guidance on  control of  air emis-
  sions from  air strippers used at Superfund sites for ground-
  water treatment. The joint memorandum from Office Direc-
  tors, OERR, and Air Quality Planning and Standards, estab-
  lishes procedures for implementation.
  Specifications: 8p.
  Subject index keywords: Air pollution control  equipment,
  Hazardous  materials, Strippers, Superfund,  Office of  Solid
  Waste and  Emergency Response, Waste management.

1400  Control of Air Emissions from Superfund Sites
  Order Number PB93-215614CpH, price:  PC A08/MF A02
  Radian Corp., Austin, TX".'; Environmental Protection Agency,
  Cincinnati, OH. Center for Environmental Research
  Information; Nov 92
  The Intended audience for the handbook are engineers and
  scientists involved  in preparing Remedial Design (RD) plans
  for Superfund sites The handbook contains a summary of
  existing information and an overview of  the topic of air emis-
  sion controls  is presented.  The handbook  contains back-
  ground information to familiarize the user with the technical
  basis for each control technology.  Specific guidance is pro-
  vided to assist the user  in limiting the choices of potential
  control technologies and in selecting a specific set of control
  technologies for a given application. References are included
  for users seeking more  detailed guidance. The handbook is a
  screening tool and is not intended to provide  detailed techni-
  cal specifications for preparing bid packages.
  Specifications:  See also PB86-151677. Sponsored by Envi-
  ronmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Center for En-
  vironmental Research Information. 163p.
  Subject index keywords: Superfund,  Air pollution  control
  equipment, Hazardous materials, Remediation.
1401  Control of Transient Incinerator Emissions with an
  Oxygen Based Combustion System
  Order Number PB91-182725CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
  Union Carbide Industrial Gases, Inc., Tarrytown, NY.; Foster
  Wheeler Enviresponse,  inc., Edison, NJ.*Environmental
  Protec,tion Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk  Reduction
  Engineering Lab; 1990
  The subject of the paper is the experience with a novel and
  field-proven method  for  the enhanced control of transient
  emissions from rotary kiln incinerators  using oxygen enrich-
  ment. When high-BTU content wastes are fed into rotary kiln
  incinerators in an intermittent mode (typical of ram feed sys-
  tems), the  transient combustion behavior of  these materials
  creates unsteady releases of combustible gases which may
  momentarily deplete the oxygen content of kiln gases. These
  temporary  oxygen-deficient conditions  could  cause  the  re-
  lease of products of incomplete combustion (PICs). Release
  of PICs from incinerators has raised public concern and has
  been the subject of research projects sponsored by the EPA.
  The enhanced control of transient emissions was demon-
  strated  by the field operation of the EPA Mobile  Incineration
  System  (MIS)  at  the  Denney Farm  Superfund Site in
  McDowell,  Missouri. During the field operation of the MIS,
  large quantities of  high-BTU content wastes were burned pe-
  riodically. These materials were ram-fed into the rotary kiln at
  a frequency of about twice a minute. To respond to the tran-
  sient oxygen demand resulting from the burning of these ma-
  terials,  a unique oxygen  feedforward-feedback control logic
  was designed into the LINDE Oxygen Combustion System
  (OCS) which was retrofitted into the MIS in  1987.  After imple-
  mentation of the OCS, transient upset conditions were signifi-
  cantly reduced during the operation of the MIS.  Low NOx
  emissions were also achieved.
  Specifications:  Presented at the  Haztech International '90
  held in  Houston, TX. on  May 8-10, 1990. Prepared in coop-
  eration  with Foster Wheeler Enviresponse, Inc.,  Edison, NJ.
  Sponsored by Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati,
  OH. Risk Reduction Engineering Lab. 25p.
  Subject index keywords: Air pollution control, Incineration,
  Kilns, Combustion efficiency, Waste disposal, Oxygen com-
  bustion system.

1402  Design Considerations for Ambient Air Monitoring
  at Superfund Sites. Engineering Bulletin
  Order Number PB94-102407CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Emergency and Remedial Response; Nov 92
  The Engineering Bulletin  is intended to help the RPM design
  the  site-specific air monitoring program needed  before, and
  during site remediation. The types of AAM activities of inter-
  est at Superfund sites are selecting the most appropriate ap-
  proach, establishing the data quality objectives, and selecting
  the  proper  sampling and analytical techniques.  Key design
  considerations, limitations, a procedure for designing the air
  monitoring program, and  other relevant technical information
  regarding AAM at Superfund sites are presented. The bulletin
  also provides a point of contact for further information.
  Specifications: 9p.
  Subject index keywords: Air pollution sampling, Superfund,
  Documents.

1403   Engineered Biofilter for Removing Organic
  Contaminants in Air
  Order Number PB94-163532CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
  Aluminum Co. of America, Pittsburgh, PA.; Environmental
  Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk Reduction
  Engineering Lab; cMar 94
  Biofiltration is an  established economic air pollution control
  technology for removing  organic contaminants in air. An en-
  gineered biofilter  using synthetic media, such as activated
  carbon, has  been  developed that shows improvements in re-
  moval  efficiency,  biodegradation  and space  requirements
  over the existing filters. This carbon filter has been operated
  for  > 11 months in a bench-top unit, accomplishing > or =
  90 percent removal efficiency consistently in a  stream con-
  taining  10 to 20 ppm of toluene. The mass transfer zone re-
  mained stationary  and extremely short (1 to 4 seconds of
  empty  bed contact time) during the entire operating  period.
  Compared with existing filters, this  engineered filter showed
 270

-------
                                                                TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Air
                                                                                                      Technologies
   40 to 80 times greater biodegradation efficiency  u.nder the
   selected conditions, resulting in a decreased space require-
   ment and other advantages in equipment sizing.  (Copyright
   (c) 1994 - Air & Water Management Association.)
   Specifications: Pub. in Jnl. of the  Air and Waste Manage-
   ment, v44 n3 p299-303, Mar 94. Sponsored by Environmen-
   tal Protection Agency,  Cincinnati, OH. Risk Reduction Engi-
   neering Lab. 7p.
   Subject index  keywords: Filtration, Scrubbers, Air pollution
   control.

 1404  Engineering Bulletin: Air Pathway Analysis
   Order Number PB93-163046CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
   Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk
   Reduction Engineering Lab; Nov 92
   The  bulletin presents  information  on  estimating toxic  air
   emissions from Superfund sites. The focus is on the collec-
   tion of air emissions data during the site  inspection and re-
   medial investigation/feasibility  study and  the  use of these
   data for the selection or implementation  of treatment tech-
   nologies. Emissions of  volatile compounds and  paniculate
   matter during site disturbances, such as excavation, may be
   several orders of magnitude greater than the emissions level
   of an undisturbed site.  The potential air emissions from the
   undisturbed  and disturbed site must be  considered before
   developing a site mitigation strategy.
   Specifications:   See  also  PB89-180053,  PB89-180061
   PB90-113374, PB90-113382 and PB92-180033. 1.0p.   :
   Subject index  keywords: Superfund, Toxic substances, Air
   pollution, Waste disposal, Air Pathway Analysis.

1405 Engineering Bulletin: Technology Preselection Data
   Requirements
   Order Number PB93-105591CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
   Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
   Emergency and  Remedial Response;  Oct 92
   The bulletin  provides a listing of soil,  water, and contaminant
   data elements needed to evaluate the potential applicability
   of technologies for  treating contaminated soils and water.
   With this base set of data in hand, experts familiar with the
   applicability  of  treatment technologies can better  focus the
   advice and assistance they give to those involved at Super-
  fund sites. The  data compiled should permit preselection of
  applicable treatment methods and the direct elimination of
  others. This  bulletin emphasizes the site physical and chemi-
  cal  soil and water characteristics for which observations and
  measurements should be compiled. Gathering and analyzing
  the information  called for in this bulletin  prior to  extensive
  field investigations will facilitate streamlining and targeting of
  the sampling and analytical objectives of the overall  program.
  Specifications:  9p.
  Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste treatment, Soil
  treatment, Hazardous materials, Water pollution,   Data re-
  quirements.

1406  Estimating VOC Emissions from Superfund Sites in
  the Houston-Galveston Texas Area. (NNEMS Project No.
  1302)                                         J
  Order Number PB92-196013CDH, price: PC A06
  Environmental Protection Agency, Dallas, TX. Region VI; Aug
  90
  The purpose  of the report focused on estimating the volatile
  organic compound (VOC) emissions from Superfund sites in
.  the  Houston-Galveston-Brazoria Consolidated  Metropolitan
   Statistical Area and the Buemont-Port Artur Metropolitan Sta-
   tistical Area. Research of available data in the Environmental
   Protection Agency Region VI files is expanded over a three
   month time period. The intention of the project was to esti-
   mate a tons per year VOC emissions rate. All the data and
   information presented in the paper on VOC emissions from
   Superfund  sites   was  obtained   from   publicly  available
   sources.
   Specifications:  Portions of this document are not fully legi-
   ble. 107p.
   Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Air pollution,
   Standard Metropolitan Statistical Areas, Texas, Superfund.

 1407  Estimation of Air Impacts for Bioventing Systems
   Used at Superfund Sites. Air/Superfund National
   Technical Guidance  Study Series
   Order Number PB93-215655CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
   Radian Corp., Austin,  TX.; Environmental Protection Agency,
   Washington, DC. Office of Emergency and  Remedial
   Response; Apr 93
   The report provides  procedures for estimating  the ambient
   air concentrations  associated with bioventing.  Bioventing is
   an insitu remediation  process where oxygen is  introduced to
  the contaminated  subsurfaces to  enhance biodegradation
   rates of the  organic contaminants.  Procedures are given  to
  evaluate the effect of exhaust gas flow rate and contaminant
  concentration on the  emission rates and on the ambient air
  concentrations at  selected distances from the area. Health-
  based ambient air  action levels are also provided for compar-
  ison to the estimated ambient concentrations.
  Specifications: See  also PB93-215622. Sponsored by Envi-
  ronmental  Protection Agency,  Washington, DC.  Office  of
  Emergency and Remedial Response. 54p.
  Subject index keywords: Superfund, Remediation, Ambient
  air quality, Bioventing.

1408  Estimation of Air Impacts for Solidification and
  Stabilization Processes Used at Superfund Sites. Air/
  Superfund National Technical Guidance Study Series
  Order Number PB93-215622CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
  Radian Corp., Austin, TX.; Environmental Protection Agency,
  Washington, DC. Office of Emergency and Remedial
  Response; Apr 93
  The report provides procedures for estimating  the ambient
  air concentrations  associated with solidification/stabilization
  of  contaminated soil or  sludge. Solidification/stabilization
  processes are used to immobilize toxic and hazardous con-
  stituents in the contaminated soil or sludge. Procedures are
  given to evaluate the  effect of the treatment rate  and con-
  taminant concentration on the emission rates and on the am-
  bient air concentrations at selected distances from  the treat-
  ment  area. Health-based ambient air action levels are also
  provided for comparison to the estimated ambient concentra-
  tions.
  Specifications:  See  also PB93-215630, PB87-116745 and
  PB93-186807.   Sponsored   by  Environmental  Protection
  Agency, Washington, DC. Office of Emergency and Remedial
  Response. 54p.
  Subject index keywords: Superfund, Remediation, Ambient
  air quality, Stabilization, Solidification.
                                                                                                               271

-------
TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Air
Technologies
1409   Estimation of Air Impacts for Thermal Desorption
  Units Used at Superfund Sites. Air/Superfund National
  Technical Guidance Study Series
  Order Number PB93-215630CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
  Radian Corp., Austin, TX.; Environmental Protection Agency,
  Washington, DC. Office of Emergency and Remedial
  Response; Apr 93
  The report provides procedures for  estimating  the ambient
  air concentrations associated with thermal desorption. Ther-
  mal Sesorption is a treatment process where heat is used to
  physically  remove  organic  compounds  from soils  and
  sludges.  Procedures are given to evaluate the  effect of the
  treafjirient rate and contaminant concentration on the emis-
  sion rates and on the ambient air concentrations at selected
  distances from the treatment area. Health-based ambient air
  action levels are also provided for comparison to the estimat-
  ed ambient concentrations.
  Specifications:  See also PB93-215648. Sponsored by Envi-
  ronmental  Protection Agency, Washington,  DC. Office  of
  Emergency and Remedial Response. 54p.
  Subject  Index keywords: Superfund, Remediation, Ambient
  air quality, Thermal desorption.
 1410  Evaluation of Emission Factors for  Formaldehyde
  from Certain Wood Processing Operations. Final Report,
  May-August 1989
  Order Number PB90-254988CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
  Radian Corp., Research Triangle Park, NC.; Environmental
  Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, NC. Air and
  Energy Engineering Research Lab; Jun 90
  The report gives results of a search  for information on form-
  aldehyde emissions from wood veneer operations, to devel-
  op emission  factors for the industry. Formaldehyde releases
  of  246 kg were reported under Title III  of the Superfund
  Amendments and  Reauthprization Act (SARA)  of 1986 from
  a large plywood plant in Mississippi. However,  existing data
  found during the study period were  insufficient to allow reli-
  able emission factors to be calculated.
  Specifications: See also PB88-118492. Sponsored by Envi-
  ronmental Protection Agency,  Research Triangle Park, NC.
  Air and Energy Engineering Research Lab. 33p.
  Subject index keywords: Formaldehyde, Air pollution con-
   trol, Emission factors, Wood products industry.
 1411   Foam Scrubbing (Chapter 9)
   Order Number PB93-236560CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
   Foster Wheeler Enviresponse, Inc., Livingston, NJ.;
   Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk
   Reduction Engineering Lab; 15 Sep 93
   Aqueous foam is  a mixture of air (or other gas), surfactant
   and water. Foam can be used in at  least  two ways for emis-
   sion control: foam  blanketing  and foam scrubbing. Foam
   scrubbing differs from blanketing in that the  foam  (usually
   high-expansion) is blown using the contaminated air that is to
   be treated. Thus, in foam scrubbing the contaminant is inside
   the foam bubbles. While the release is contained  in  this
   manner, a scrubbing process can take place. The foam solu-
   tion can be formulated to include an appropriate reagent that
   can 'neutralize1 the absorbed gases, if necessary (for exam-
   ple, an acidic additive to neutralize ammonia). Potential appli-
   cations  of foam scrubbing for emergency control are many:
   the chemical industry (ammonia, hydrogen  chloride, sulfuric
   acid, etc.), municipalities  (chlorine tanks  at water treatment
   facilities), and emergency responders (chemical spills, tank
 truck accidents, etc.) Foam scrubbing could also be used at
 Superfund sites during excavation to safeguard workers and
 surrounding  communities from releases of volatile toxic ma-
 terials. The chapter summarizes the available information on
 foam scrubbing, including  results of an EPA  research pro-
 gram on the subject. Although  largely still in the research
 stage, the information available to date is encouraging.
 Specifications:  Pub. in Prevention and Control  of Acciden-
 tal Releases of Hazardous Gases,  p232-252 Jun 93. See
 also  PB82-227117. Sponsored by Environmental Protection
 Agency, Cincinnati,  OH.  Risk Reduction Engineering  Lab.
 22p.
 Subject index keywords: Air pollution control, Foam, Fugi-
 tive emissions, Foam scrubbing.

1412   Instructional Package on Regulatory Air Quality
  Modeling. Part 1: Videos on the 'Guideline on Air Quality
  Models (Revised)' and the Model Clearinghouse (Video)
  Order Number PB94-780012CDH, price: Call for price
  Pacific  Environmental Services, Inc., Research Triangle Park,
  NC.;  Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle
  Park, NC. Technical Support Div; Jun 92
  Video tape  presentations  describe the  major regulatory air
  modeling guidance document, the  'Guideline  on Air Quality
  Models (Revised),' and the Agency's focal point for reviewing
  the use of dispersion modeling techniques, the Model Clear-
  inghouse. The intended audience for these materials is those
  professionals who have some technical experience  using a
  personal  computer (PC) and  whose  responsibilities  now in-
  clude running  EPA's air quality models (1)  to assess the
  impact of emissions from new  or modified sources or air
  toxics releases, or (2) to replicate the model  results submit-
  ted  in  conjunction with such  regulatory programs as New
  Source Review (NSR), Prevention of Significant Deterioration
  (PSD),  National Ambient Air  Quality Standard (NAAQS) at-
  tainment demonstrations, Superfund (SARA), and others.
  Specifications: This VHS video is 1/2 inch, color, stereo
  sound, playing time of 60 minutes with instructions sheets in-
  cluded in package.  Part 2 (Diskette Version)  is available as
  PB94-500626.  Sponsored  by Environmental   Protection
  Agency, Research Triangle Park, NC. Technical  Support Div.
  1 VHS video.
  Subject index keywords: Air pollution dispersion, Pollution
  regulations, Models.
 1413  Long-Path FTIR Measurements of Volatile Organic
  Compounds in an Industrial Setting (July 1989-April
  1991)
  Order  Number PB92-206424CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
  NSl Technology Services Corp.,  Research Triangle Park,
  NC.; MDA Scientific, Inc., Norcross, GA.**Nicolet Instrument
  Corp.,  Madison, WI.*Environmental Protection Agency,
  Research Triangle Park, NC. Atmospheric Research and
  Exposure Assessment Lab; c1991
  As  part  of  a Superfund  Innovative Technology  Evaluation
  (SITE) field  program, a  Fourier transform  infrared (FTIR)
  spectrometer was used to make open path measurements of
  volatile organic  compounds  in  the  New Castle, Delaware,
  area. The SITE  program  requires  that  new  technologies be
  compared with more mature measurement techniques. In this
  case,  a canister-based sampling and analytical  methodology
  was chosen to compare with the FTIR measurements. Whole
  air samples were collected in the canisters as they were re-
  272

-------
                                                                 TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Air
                                                                                                      Technologies
    peated y transported along the open measurement path of
    the FTIR spectrometer. FTIR spectra were co-added for 32-
    min sampling intervals. Conclusions were: (1) that the FTIR
    system as it is currently configured can be used as a reliable
    monitoring  instrument when the concentrations are greater
    han about 50 ppbv; (2) that transporting the canisters along
    the path is a viable technique for comparing long-path and
    point-sampler measurements.
    Specifications:  Pub.  in Jnl. of the Air and Waste Manage-
    ment  Association, v41 n8  p1062-1066 Aug 91. Prepared in
    cooperation with MDA Scientific, Inc., Norcross, GA. and Ni-
    coiet  Instrument Corp., Madison, Wl. Sponsored by Environ-
    mental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park  NC  At-
    mospheric Research and Exposure Assessment Lab. 7p.
    Subject index keywords: Volatile organic compounds Infra-
    red spectrometers, Hazardous materials, Superfund.

 1414  Measurement of Volatile Organic Compounds during
   Start-Up of Bioremediation of French Limited Superfund
   Site in Crosby Texas Using Wind Dependent Whole-Air
   Sampling
   Order Number PB93-168821CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
   Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park
   NC. Atmospheric Research  and  Exposure Assessment Lab •
   P.3?  ^*vnVi?nmental Tecnnol°gy. lnc-  Research Triangle
   Park, NC.'XonTech, Inc., Van Nuys, CA; 1993
   Whole-air sampling was performed before and after the start-
   up of  the  bioremediation  of an industrial (primarily  petro-
   chemical) waste lagoon in Crosby Texas, near Houston Four
    bector Samplers' were deployed at the four corners of the
   French Limited Superfund Site. These samplers collect  air
   into one of two SUMMA polished canisters depending upon
   wind direction and speed. When the wind  blows at  the sam-
   pler from across  the waste lagoon, air is  routed to the 'IN'
   sector canister, otherwise sample is collected in the 'OUT'
   sector  canister.  As such,  each sampler  provides  its own
   background sample, and,  upon  gas  chromatographic analy-
   sis, individual compounds can be associated with the waste
   lagoon. Five sets  of 24-hour sector samples were taken- the
   first set was collected prior to the start of the bioremediation
   effort and the remaining four sets were taken sequentially for
   four 24-hour periods after the start-up of the procedure.
   Specifications:  See also PB92-206432. Prepared  in coop-
  eration with  ManTech Environmental  Technology  Inc  Re-
  searchJTriangle Park, NC. Sponsored by XonTech, Inc.,' Van

  Subject index keywords: Volatile organic compounds Bio-
  logical  treatment,  Remedial  action,  Superfund, Air  pollution
  sampling, Waste management.

1415  Options for Developing and Evaluating Mitigation
  strategies for Indoor Air Impacts at CERCLA Sites  Air/
  Superfund National Technical Guidance Study Series
  Report ASF-36                                     '
  Order Number PB94-110517CDH, price: PC A08/MF  A02
  Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle  Park
  NC. Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards; Sep 93 '
  The purpose of the document is  to present and analyze ap-
  proaches that may be used  to mitigate the Comprehensive
  ^Z°^eo^' ResPonse> Compensation, and Liability Act of
  1980 (CERCLA) site impacts on the indoor air  quality  of
  nearby structures.  The document is designed to provide in-
 formation that may assist in resolution  of indoor air quality
 concerns at CERCLA sites.  The procedures  and methods
    however, may also be useful in developing mitigation strate-
    gies for indoor air impacts from other hazardous wastes and
    hazardous materials sources. The document focuses primari-
    ly on mitigation methods that may be applied in the immedi-
    ate  vicinity  of  the   impacted   or  potentially  impacted
    structure(s). Reference is made to CERCLA site remediation
    methods that may also have a beneficial impact on indoor air
    quality, but these are not discussed in detail. The document
    includes summary level information on technical methods to
    prevent or reduce the intrusion of site related chemicals into
   the indoor environment and institutional methods to restrict
   the use of  developed and  undeveloped  property to the
   extent necessary to reduce risks to acceptable levels.
   Specifications: See also PB93-122257.  167p.
   Subject index  keywords: Superfund, Indoor air  pollution
   Remedial action.

 1416  Review and Evaluation of Area Source Dispersion
   Algorithms for Emission Sources at Superfund Sites
   Order Number PB90-142753CDH, price: PC A06/MF A01
   Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park,
   NC. Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards.; TRC
   Environmental Consultants, Inc., East Hartford, CT; Nov 89
   The report examines air quality dispersion modeling algo-
   rithms and related technical issues associated with  estimat-
   ing ambient concentrations from area  sources at Superfund
   sites. The report describes the area source emission charac-
   teristics associated with Superfund sites and provides a
   review of existing, available techniques  for modeling area
   sources. It also describes the results of applying five short-
   term and three long-term area source models to a number of
   example applications and  one field data base in  order to
   compare the magnitude of concentration predictions and test
   whether concentration estimates are consistent with mathe-
   matical and physical principles. The report provides conclu-
   sions and recommendations.
  Specifications:  Prepared in cooperation with TRC  Environ-
  mental Consultants, Inc., East Hartford,  CT. 124p.
  Subject index keywords: Atmospheric diffusion, Hazardous
  materials, Mathematical models, Air quality, Superfund pro-
  gram, Environmental transport, Air pollution sampling.

1417  Sector Sampling for VOC's during Remediation of
  Superfund Site at Shaver's Farm, Georgia
  Order Number PB91-182840CDH, price: PC A03/MF  A01
  ManTech Environmental Technology, Inc.,  Research Triangle
  Park, NC.; Environmental Protection Agency, Research
  Triangle Park, NC. Atmospheric Research and Exposure
  Assessment Lab;  1991
  The sector sampling approach for  the  determination of the
  spatial  contributions of volatile  organic compounds  to the
  ambient air was employed at a Superfund  site under remedi-
  ation. Two canister based sampling  systems were deployed
  and whole air samples were collected at the Shaver's Farm
  Superfund Site in  northwest Georgia near Chattanooga, Ten-
  nessee, while chemical waste drums were excavated and re-
  packaged. The  method is based upon the collection of a
  constant stream of air into one of two SUMMA polished can-
  isters depending on wind direction; when the wind comes to-
 wards  the  sampler from  the  suspected  emissions  area,
 sample  is routed into the  'IN'  sector  canister, otherwise,
 sample is collected in the 'OUT' sector canister. Upon analy-
 sis, the comparison between the IN and  OUT sample results
                                                                                                              273

-------
TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION:
Bioremediation Technologies
  indicates compounds that are emitted  from  the suspected
  source area. Data from the week-long  Shaver's Farm field
  study are presented along, with a mathematical method for
  Interpretation.
  Specifications:  Sponsored by  Environmental  Protection
  Agency, Research Triangle Park, NC. Atmospheric Research
  and Exposure Assessment Lab. 18p.
  Subject index keywords: Air pollution sampling, Superfund,
  Waste disposal, Waste storage, Volatile organic compounds,
  Remedial action.


TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM

IMPLEMENTATION: Bioremediation

Technologies

1418  Alternative Biological Treatment  Processes for
  Remediation of Crepsote-and PCP-Contaminated
  Materials: Bench-Scale Treatability Studies
  Order Number PB91-179085CDH, price: PC A05/MF A01
  Southern BioProducts, Inc., Pendleton, SC.; Technical
  Resources, Inc., Gulf Breeze, FL.*Environmental Research
  Lab., Gulf Breeze, FL; Mar 91
  Bench-scale biotreatability studies were performed to deter-
  mine the most  effective of  two bioremediation  application
  strategies to  ameliorate creosote-  and pentachlorophenol
   (PCP)-contaminated soils present at the American Creosote
  Wo/ks Superfund site, Pensacola, Florida: solid-phase biore-
   meolation or slurry-phase bioremediation. When indigenous
   microorganisms were employed as biocatalysts, solid-phase
   bioremediation was slow and ineffective (8-12 weeks re-
   quired to biodegrade >50% of resident organics). Biodegra-
   dation  was  limited to  lower-molecular-weight constituents
   rather  than  the more hazardous,  higher-molecular-weight
   (HMW) compounds; PCP and HMW polycyclic aromatic hy-
   drocarbons (PAHs) containing 4 or more fused rings resisted
   biological attach. Moreover, supplementation  with aqueous
   solution of inorganic nutrients had little effect on the overall
   effectiveness of the treatment strategy. Alternatively, slurry-
   phase bioremediation was much more effective: >50% of
   targeted organics were biodegraded in 14 days. Again,  how-
   ever, more persistent contaminants, such as PCP and HMW
   PAHs, were not extensively degraded when  subjected to the
   action of indigenous microorganisms.
   Specifications: Prepared in cooperation with Technical Re-
   sources, Inc., Gulf Breeze, FL. Sponsored by  Environmental
   Research Lab., Gulf Breeze, FL. 97p.
   Subject index keywords:  Biological  treatment,  Remedial
   action, Creosote,  Superfund, Waste disposal, Phenol/pen-
   tachloro.
  1419  Bench-Scale Evaluation of Alternative Biological
   Treatment Processes for the Remediation of
   Pentachlorophenol- and Creosote-Contaminated
   Materials: Slurry-Phase Bioremediation
   Order Number PB92-129683CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
   Environmental Research Lab., Gulf Breeze, FL; c1991
   Performance data on slurry-phase bioremediation of pentach-
   lorophenol (PCP)- and creosote-contaminated sediment and
   surface soil were generated at the bench-scale level. Aque-
   ous slurries,  containing 0.05% Triton  X-100 to facilitate the
   soil washing process  and to help  stabilize  the suspensions,
 were  prepared from sediment and surface soil freshly ob-
 tained from the American Creosote Works Superfund site at
 Pensacola, Florida.  Excluding  PCP,  benzo(b)fluoranthene,
 benzo(k)-fluoranthene  and   indeno(123-cd)pyrene,  slurry-
 phase bioremediation of highly contaminated  sediment (pH
 adjusted) resulted in rapid and extensive biodegradation (3-5
 days to biodegrade > 50% of targeted compounds) of moni-
 tored constituents. Data suggest that slurry-phase bioreme-
 diation strategies  can be effectively employed to remediate
 creosote-contaminated materials.
 Specifications:  Pub. in Environmental Science  and Tech-
 nology,  v25 n6 p1055-1061  1991. See also  PB91-179085.
 9p.
 Subject  index keywords:  Biological  treatment,  Remedial
 action, Waste disposal, Creosote, Superfund, Phenol/pen-
 tachloro.
1420  Bench-Scale Evaluation of Alternative Biological
 Treatment Processes for the Remediation of
  Pentachlorophenol- and Creosote-Contaminated
  Materials: Solid-Phase Bioremediation
  Order Number PB92-129725CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
  Environmental Research Lab., Gulf Breeze, FL; c1991
  Bench-scale  biotreatability studies were performed to evalu-
  ate potential  for a solid-phase  bioremediation  process to
  ameliorate pentachlorophenol (PCP)- and  creosote-contami-
  nated sediment  and surface soil at  the American Creosote
  Works Superfund site,  Pensacola, Florida.  Surface soil and
  sediment were contaminated with approximately 1 and 7%
  (weight basis) organic pollutants, respectively, but the more
  recalcitrant creosote constituents (i.e., high-molecular-weight
  polycyclic aromatic  hydrocarbons)  were  proportionately
  higher in the surface soil indicative  of creosote  weathering.
  Data suggest that full-scale site remediation employing solid-
  phase bioremediation strategies may not effectively meet ac-
  ceptable treatment standards in the time defining these stud-
  ies.
  Specifications:   Pub.  in Environmental Science and Tech-
  nology,  y25  n6  p1045-1055 1991.  See also PB89-109920
  and  PB88-174446. 13p.
  Subject  index  keywords:  Biological  treatment, Remedial
  action, Creosote, Waste management, Phenol/pentachloro,
  Superfund.
 1421  Bioremediation: An Information Update on Applying
  Bioremediation to Site Cleanup
  Order Number PB93-126175CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Mar 92
  The Bioremediation Field Initiative was established to provide
  the  U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and State
  Project Managers, consulting engineers,  and industry  with
  timely information regarding new developments  in the appli-
  cation of bioremediation at hazardous waste  sites. The initia-
  tive provides evaluation of the performance  of selected full-
   scale field applications; provides technical assistance to Re-
   medial  Project  Managers (RPMs) and On-Scene Coordina-
   tors (OSCs), through the Technical Support  Centers; and is
   developing a data base on  the field applications of bioreme-
   diation, which is summarized in this  bulletin.
   Specifications: See  also  PB92-224708 and PB92-224807.
   34p.
  274

-------
                                                                     TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION:
                                                                                      Bioremediation Technologies
      t             keywords:  Biological  treatment,  Remedial
    action  Waste  management,  Hazardous materials, Cleanup
    osr
  1422  Bioremediation in the Field. An Information Update
    on 'Applying Bioremediation to Site Clean-Up. Number 3
    Order Number PB92-224807CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
    cnr!??n,mental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
    bond Waste and Emergency Response; Aug 91
    not Blo[f mediation Fie|d Initiative was  established to provide
    lnrin«SP  fh3!0 P,r°jef Mana9ers- consulting engineers  and
    industry with timely information regarding new developments
    in the application of bioremediation at hazardous waste sites
    The initiative will fully evaluate the performance of selected
    DDM0    J'H aPP|icati°ns, provide  technical assistance to
    RPMs and  OSCs, and develop a treatability database to be
    available through the Alternative Treatment Technologies In-
    ormation Center (ATTIC).  Six sites have currently been se-
    tected for field evaluation of bioremediation: Libby Superfund
   ?£L   ftr M°ntana;  Park  City Pipeline  Spill,  Park City,
   Kansas; Allied  Signal Superfund Site, St. Joseph,  Michigan
   Eielson Air Force Base, Alaska; Hill Air Force Base,  Utah:
   and Brookhaven Superfund Site, Brookhaven, MS.
   Specifications: 25p.
   Subject index  keywords: Biological  treatment,  Remedial
   action  Hazardous  materials,  Waste  management, Cleanup
   operations.

 1423  Bioremediation in the Field: An Information  Update
   on Applying Bioremediation to Site Cleanup. (Number 4)
   Order Number PB92-224708CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
   Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC.  Office  of
   bond waste and Emergency Response;  Dec 91
   Contents: Update on the Bioremediation Field Initiative; Bior-
   emediation Being Evaluated at the Brookhaven Wood Pre-
   serving Facility; Bioremediation Action Committee-  1991 Ac-
   complishments; Interim Guidelines Issued for Preparing Bior-
   emediation Spill Response Plans; FTTA Offers Opportunities
   for Cooperative Biosystems R&D with EPA; 1991  Bioreme-
   diation Field Projects;  RREL Provides Technical Support for
   Bioremediation of Superfund Sites; Bioremediation Field Initi-
   ative  Contacts;   EPA   Bioremediation   Publications;   EPA
  Athens Lab  and GLNPO Demonstrate  Anaerobic Degrada-
  tion of PCBs; Cleanup Information Bulletin Board; Field Appli-
  cations of Bioremediation; Bioremediation Live Satellite Sem-
  iri£ir.
  Specifications:  29p.
  Subject index  keywords:  Biological treatment, Remedial
  action, Hazardous materials, Waste management, Bioreme-
  diation, Cleanup.

14fo0oB'°remediation in tne Field: Number 1, November
  1990
  Order Number PB93-206340CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
  !nr!f?n,mental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  bond Waste and Emergency  Response; Nov 90
  The Bioremediation  Field Initiative is designed to  provide
  tPA and State project  managers,  consulting engineers, and
  industry with timely information regarding new developments
  in the application of bioremediation. These applications in-
  clude the cleanup of abandoned waste sites, industrial facili-
  ties, leaking underground storage tanks and ground water
  ™f /T,™°m th~Se S0urces- Tne Technology Innovation
  Office  (TIO), an office within the Office of Solid Waste and
    Emergency  Response (OSWER),  in conjunction  with  the
    Office of Research and  Development's (ORD) Office  of
    Technology  Transfer and  Regulatory Support,  will produce
    the bulliten on a regular basis to serve as the principal infor-
    mation transfer mechanism for the Bioremediation Field Initi-
    ative.

    Specifications:  See also PB92-224708 and PB92-224807
    18p.

   Subject  index keywords: Biological treatment, Remedial
   action, Hazardous materials, Waste management.

 1425   Bioremediation Resource Guide and Bioremediation
   Resource Matrix
   Order Number PB94-112307CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
   Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
   Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Sep 93
   The Bioremediation  Resource Guide is intended to support
   decision-making by  Regional  and State Corrective Action
   permit  writers,  Remedial   Project  Managers  (RPMs),  On-
   Scene Coordinators,  contractors, and other involved in evalu-
   ating cleanup alternatives by directing readers to  bioremedia-
   tion  resource documents,  databases, hotlines, and dockets
   as well as identifying regulatory mechanisms (e.g., Research
   Development and Demonstration  Permits) that have the po-
   tential to ease the implementation of bioremediation at haz-
   ardous waste sites. The Guide provides  abstracts of repre-
   sentative examples of over  80 bioremediation bibliographies,
   guidance,  workshop reports, overview documents, study/test
   results,  and test designs/protocols. The Bioremediation Re-
   source Matrix, which accompanies the Guide, identifies  the
   technology, media, and  contaminants covered in each  ab-
   stracted document. The included documents focus for  the
   most  part on soil and  ground water and on  in-situ, slurry
   phase, and land treatment bioremediation.
  Specifications:  32p.
  Subject index  keywords:  Superfund,  Waste processing
  Bioremediation.

1426  Pilot-Scale Demonstration of a Slurry-Phase
  Biological Reactor for Creosote-Contaminated Soil.
  Applications Analysis Report
  Order Number PB94-124039CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
  IT Corp., Cincinnati, OH.; Environmental Protection Agency,
  Cincinnati,  OH. Risk Reduction  Engineering Lab; Jan 93
  IT Corporation  in  conjunction with  ECOVA Corporation
  (ECOVA)  evaluated  ECOVA's  slurry-phase bioremediation
 technology  under  U.S.  Environmental Protection  Agency's
 (EPA)  Superfund Innovative Technology  Evaluation (SITE)
 program. The purpose of this report is to present information
 from the SITE  demonstration and from three case studies to
 evaluate the technical and  economic applicability  of slurry-
 phase  bioremediation  technology to the remediation of  soil-
 and sludge-bound hazardous  contaminants.
 Specifications:   Sponsored by Environmental  Protection
 Agency,  Cincinnati,  OH.  Risk  Reduction  Engineering Lab.
 /op.

 Subject index keywords: Soil treatment, Hazardous materi-
 als, Superfund, Waste treatment, Creosote, Slurry bio-reac-
 tors, Innovative treatment technologies.
                                                                                                              275

-------
TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION:
Groundwater Technologies
1427  Respirometric Methods for Determination of
  Blodegradablllty and Biodegradation Kinetics for
  Hazardous Organic Pollutant Compounds
  Order Number PB92-217108CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk
  Reduction Engineering Lab.; Cincinnati Univ., OH. Dept. of
  Chemical and Nuclear Engineering; 1992
  The purpose of the study was to obtain  information on bio-
  logical treatafaility of the benzene, phenol,  phthalate and
  ketone organics and of the Superfund CERCLA organics
  bearing wastes in wastewater treatment systems  which will
  support development of an EPA technical guidance  docu-
  ment oh the discharge of the above organics to POTWs. The
  study was to  generate basic  information on the fate  of
  CERCLA leachate organics during on-site treatment and bio-
  degradation and inhibition data for pollutants found in Super-
  fund  site  wastewater that could be discharged to POTWs.
  Resplrometric  biodegradability, biokinetic and  inhibition data
  were generated for the selected RCRA benzene, phenolic,
  phthalate and ketone compounds.
  Specifications:  Presented at the ACS Environmental Chem-
  istry Division Symposium  on Chemical and Biochemical De-
  toxification of  Hazardous  Wastes II, Miami Beach, FL., Sep-
  tember 10-15, 1989.  Prepared in cooperation with Cincinnati
  Univ., OH. Dept. of Chemical and Nuclear Engineering. 39p.
  Subject  Index keywords: Waste disposal,  Biodeterioration,
   Organic  compounds, Kinetics, Sewage treatment, Biological
   treatment, Electrolytic respirometry.

 1428  Slurry Biodegradation
   Order Number PB91-228049CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
   Science Applications International Corp., Cincinnati, OH.;
   Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
   Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 90
   In a slurry biodegradation system, an aqueous slurry is cre-
   ated by combining soil or  sludge with water. This slurry is
   then biodegraded aerobically using a self-contained reactor
   or in a lined lagoon. Thus, slurry biodegradation can be com-
   pated to an activated sludge process or an  aerated lagoon,
   depending on the case. There are two main objectives for
   using the technology: to destroy the organic contaminant
   and, equally important, to reduce the volume of  contaminat-
   ed material. Slurry biodegradation can be the sole treatment
   technology in a complete cleanup system, or it can be used
   in conjunction with other biological,  chemical, and  physical
   treatment. It may be demonstrated in the Superfund Innova-
   tive  Technology  Evaluation  (SITE)  program. Commercial-
   scale units are in operation. Vendors should be contacted to
   determine the availability of a unit for a particular site. The
   bulletin  provides information on the technology  applicability,
   the types of residuals produced, the latest performance data,
   site requirements, the status of the technology, and sources
   for further information.
   Specifications:   Sponsored  by Environmental Protection
   Agency, Washington, DC. Office of Emergency and Remedial
    Response. 10p.
    Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Biodeterior-
    ation, Waste  treatment, Slurries, Soil treatment.
TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM

IMPLEMENTATION:  Groundwater

Technologies

1429  Advanced Oxidation Technologies for the
  Treatment of Contaminated Groundwater
  Order Number PB94-137353CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk
  Reduction Engineering Lab.; PRC Environmental
  Management, Inc., Chicago, IL; 1994
  The paper presents information on two pilot-field applications
  of advanced oxidation technologies for contaminated ground-
  water with organics. The Ultrox technology was demonstrat-
  ed  in 1989 with the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency s
  Superfund Innovative Technology Evaluation (SITE) program
  at the Lorentz Barrel and Drum (LB&D) site in San  Jose
  California. Peroxidation  Systems technology was applied at
  the Old  O-Field  site located  within  the Aberdeen Proving
  Ground  in Maryland. The information presented includes a
  description of the technologies, factors affecting the technol-
  ogies, and results from the two pilot-scale studies of the UV/
  oxidation treatment system applications.
  Specifications:  Pub. in Chemical Oxidation - Technologies
  for the Nineties,  v2 p406-417. Prepared in cooperation with
   PRC Environmental Management, Inc., Chicago, IL.  14p.
   Subject  index keywords:  Ground  water,  Water  pollution
   control, Oxidation.
 1430   Applicability of Land Disposal  Restrictions to RCRA
   and CERCLA Ground Water Treatment Reinjection
   Superfund Management Review: Recommendation No.
   26
   Order Number PB91-921332CDH, price: PC A01/MF A01
   Environmental Protection  Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
   Emergency and Remedial Response; 27 Dec 89
   The  directive discusses whether or  not ground water con-
   taminated with restricted  RCRA hazardous  wastes, which  is
   extracted during RCRA  corrective  action  or CERCLA re-
   sponse  action must meet the best  demonstrated  available
   technology (BOAT) identified for that waste under the ROHA
   land disposal restrictions (LDRs)  prior to  each  remjection.
   The directive explains EPA's  interpretation of whether the
   LDRs are applicable or  (under CERCLA  response actions
   only) relevant and appropriate to such reinjections or to the
   remediation as a whole.
   Specifications: Paper  copy available on Standing  Order, de-
   posit account required  (minimum deposit $150 U.S., Canada,
   and Mexico; all  others $300). Single copies also available in
   paper copy or microfiche. 5p.
   Subject index  keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
   Hazardous materials, Office of Solid Waste and  Emergency
   Response, Land Disposal Restrictions.

  1431  Basic Concepts of Contaminant Sorption at
    Hazardous Waste Sites (Ground Water Issue)
    Order Number PB91-191007CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
    Robert  S. Kerr Environmental Research Lab., Ada, OK; Oct
    90
    The Regional Superfund Ground Water Forum is  a group of
    ground-water scientists,  representing EPA's Regional Super-
    fund Offices, organized  to exchange  up-to-date information
  276

-------
                                                                    TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION:
                                                                                        Groundwater Technologies
   related to ground-water remediation of Superfund sites  One
   of the major .ssues of concern to the Forum is the transport
   and fate of contaminants in soil and ground water as related
   to  subsurface remediation.  Processes  which influence the
   behavior of  contaminants in  the subsurface must be consid-
   ered both in evaluating the potential for movement as well as
   m designing remediation activities at hazardous waste sites
   buch factors not only tend to regulate the mobility of con-
   taminants, but also their form and stability. Sorption is often
   the paramount process controlling  the behavior of contami-
   nants in the subsurface. The paper summarizes the basic
   concepts of  sorption  in soil and  ground water with emphasis
   on nonpolar  organic contaminants.
   Specifications:  9p.
   Subject index keywords: Ground water, Hazardous materi-
  als  Sorption, Superfund, Remedial action, Waste  disposal
  Water pollution control.

1432   Biodegradation of Creosote and Pentachlorophenol
  in Contaminated Groundwater: Chemical and Bioloqical
  Assessment
  Order Number PB92-129659CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
  Environmental Research Lab., Gulf Breeze, FL; Southern
  BioProducts,  Inc., Pendleton, SC; c1991
  Shake flask studies examined the rate and extent of biode-
  gradation of pentachlorophenol (POP) and 42 components of
  coal-tar creosote present in  contaminated  groundwater  re-
  covered from the American Creosote Works Superfund site
  Pensacola, Fla. The ability of indigenous soil microorganisms
  to remove these  contaminants from aqueous solutions was
  determined by gas  chromatographic analysis of organic ex-
  tracts of biotreated groundwater. Changes in potential envi-
  ronmental and human health hazards associated with  the
  biodegradation of the  material were determined at intervals
  by Microtox assays  and fish toxicity and teratogenicity tests
  After 14  days of  incubation at 30 C, indigenous microorga-
  nisms effectively  removed  100,  99, 94,  88, and 87%  of
  measured phenolic and lower-molecular-weight polycyclic ar-
  omatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) and  S-heterocyclic, N-heterocy-
 clic, and O-heterocyclic constituents of creosote, respective-
 ly. However, only  53% of the  higher-molecular-weight PAHs
 were degraded; PGP was not removed. Despite the removal
 of a  majority  of the organic contaminants through biotreat-
 ment, only a slight decrease in the toxicity and teratogenicity
 of biotreated groundwater was observed. Data suggest that
 toxicity and teratogenicity are associated with compounds
 difficult to treat biologically and that one may not necessarily
 rely on  indigenous  microorganisms to  effectively remove
 these compounds  in a  reasonable time span; to this end  al-
 ternative or supplemental approaches may be  necessary
 Similar measures of the toxicity and teratogenicity of treated
 material may offer  a simple, yet important, guide to bioreme-
 diation effectiveness. (Copyright (c)  1991, American Society
 for Microbiology.)
 Specifications:  Pub. in Applied and  Environmental Microbi-
 ology, v57  n5  P1277-1285 May 91. See also PB90-129552
 Prepared  in cooperation with  Southern  BioProducts  Inc
 Pendleton, SC. 11 p.                               '     '
Subject index keywords: Biodeterioration,  Water pollution
control, Biological  treatment, Hazardous materials, Ground
water, Creosote, Phenol/pentachloro
 1433  Biological Treatment of Wood Preserving Site
   Groundwater by BioTrol, Inc. Applications Analysis
   Report
   Order Number PB91-227983CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
   Science Applications International Corp., Paramus, NJ.;
   Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk
   Reduction Engineering Lab; Sep 91
   The report  is an  evaluation  of the BioTrol,  Inc. Aqueous
   Treatment  System  (BATS), a fixed-film,  aerobic  biological
   treatment process for contaminated  groundwaters and other
   wastewaters. It summarizes and analyzes the  results of the
   Superfund  Innovative Technology   Evaluation  (SITE)  Pro-
   gram's six week demonstration at the MacGillis and Gibbs
   Company wood preserving site in New Brighton,  MN. The
   conclusions  from  the pilot scale demonstration study and
   other available data are: (1) the fixed film aerobic process is
  capable of degrading pentachlorophenol (PGP) and other or-
  ganic pollutants to more than 95% removal.
  Specifications: See also PB92-110048. Sponsored by Envi-
  ronmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk Reduction
  Engineering Lab. 51 p.
  Subject index keywords: Wood preservatives, Waste treat-
  ment.

1434  Chemical Enhancements to Pump-and-Treat
  Remediation. Ground Water Issue
  Order Number PB92-180074CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC.  Office of
  Emergency and Remedial Response. Oregon  Graduate Inst.
  of Science and Technology, Beaverton. Dept.  of
  Environmental Science and  Engineering; Jan 92
  Conventional pump-and-treat technologies are  among  the
  most widely used systems for the remediation of contaminat-
  ed ground-water. Within recent  years it has become  recog-
  nized that these systems can require protracted periods of
  time to make significant  reductions in the quantity of con-
  taminants associated with both  the liquid and solid phases
  which constitute the subsurface  matrix. Evaluating the effec-
  tiveness of pump-and-treat remediations at Superfund sites,
 as well as attempting to  improve this effectiveness,  are
 issues identified by the  Regional Superfund  Ground  Water
 Forum as a  concern of Superfund  decision makers. The
 Forum is a group of ground-water scientists and engineers
 representing EPA's  Regional  Superfund Offices, organized to
 exchange the most  recent  information related to  ground-
 water remediation at Superfund  sites. Recent research has
 led to a better  understanding of the  processes involved in
 the transport and transformation  of contaminants in the sub-
 surface. While some of these processes are not readily ame-
 nable to enhance removal by ground-water extraction, others
 suggest that there are available  techniques to increase the
 efficiency of these types of remediation systems. The  intent
 of the document is to explore the use  of chemical enhance-
 ment to improve ground-water remediation efficiencies  using
 pump-and-treat technologies, and point out arenas of con-
 tamination where such techniques are not practical.
 Specifications:   See also  PB86-122561,   PB87-169090
 PB90-274549  and PB92-114461. Prepared in cooperation
 with Oregon Graduate Inst. of Science and Technology, Bea-
 verton.  Dept.  of  Environmental  Science and Engineering.

 Subject index keywords: Ground  water,  Water pollution
 control, Remedial action, Superfund.
                                                                                                              277

-------
TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION:
Groundwater Technologies
1435  Compendium of Federal Financial Assistance
  Programs: Targeting Programs for State and Local
  Ground-Water Protection
  Order Number PB93-116069CDH, price: PC A06/MF A02
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Ground-Water Protection; Sep 90
  Contents; Agricultural  Conservation;  Agricultural Education/
  Technical Assistance;  Agricultural Pollution Control; Agricul-
  tural  Research;  Community Development; Drinking  Water
  Protection; Emergency Water Assistance;  Environmental Pro-
  tection; Farm Ownership Credit; Hazardous Waste Manage-
  ment;  Pesticides  Control; Rural Development; Solid  Waste
  Management;  Superfund; Toxic  Substances;  Underground
  Storage  Tanks;  Water  Pollution Control;  and Water Re-
  sources Development.
  Specifications:  102p.
  Subject Index keywords:  Ground  water, Economic  assist-
  ance,  Project management, Water pollution control, Drinking
  water,
 1436  Considerations in Ground Water Remediation  at
   Superfund Sites
   Order Number PB91-238584CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
   Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
   Emergency and Remedial Response; 18 Oct 89
   The directive transmits findings from a study of several sites
   where ground water extraction is being conducted to  contain
   or reduce levels of contaminants in the ground water. The
   memorandum also presents several  recommendations for
   modifying the Superfund approach to  ground water  remedi-
   ation.
   Specifications:  10p.
   Subject  index keywords: Superfund, Hazardous materials,
   Waste management, Water pollution control, Office of Solid
   Waste and Emergency Response.
  •1437  Considerations in Ground-Water Remediation at
   Superfund Sites and RCRA Facilities: Update
   Order Number PB92-963358CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
   Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
   Emergency and Remedial Response; 27 May 92
   The updated directive clarifies and expands OSWER's gener-
   al  policy concerning  remediation   of contaminated  ground
   water, especially with  regard to nonaqueous phase liquid
    (NAPL) contaminants. The document  promotes a consistent
    and sound approach to ground water remediation at both Su-
    perfund  sites and  RCRA facilities and  reinforces OSWER's
    commitment to clean up ground  water contamination  at
    these sites.
    Specifications: Paper copy available  on Standing Order, de-
    posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S.,  Canada,
    and  Mexico; all  others $400). Single copies  also available in
    paper copy or microfiche. 13p.
    Subject Index  keywords: Ground water, Pollution  control,
    Government policies, Superfund, Remedial action.
  1438  Detoxification of PentachJorophenol and Creosote
     Contaminated Groundwater by Physical Extraction:
     Chemical and Biological  Assessment
     Order Number PB92-129733CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
     Environmental Research Lab., Gulf Breeze, FL; c1991
     Chemical analyses revealed that  polycyclic aromatic hydro-
     carbons (PAH's) and other organic compounds were present
     In a perennial  freshwater stream that flowed  through the
 abandoned American Creosote Works, designated for Super-
 fund cleanup by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.
 A study was conducted to determine efficacy of ultrafiltration
 for removal of these organics from groundwater at the Su-
 perfund site. Ultrafiltration reduced the concentration of total
 identified  organics from 210.0 mg/L in groundwater to 1.5
 mg/L in the post-filtration permeate. Tests for toxicity/terato-
 genicity in embryonic  inland silversides,  Menidia  beryllina;
 and Microtox were conducted with: streamwater, untreated
 groundwater, feedwater used in the ultrafiltration system and
 permeate  water  that  passed  through  the  ultrafiltration
 system. A concentration of 100% streamwater caused  signif-
 icant (alpha <  or = 0.05) teratogenic responses in fish em-
 bryos and larvae. Groundwater and feedwater caused signifi-
 cant embryo toxic or teratogenic responses at concentrations
 of 100 10 and 1%; Microtox ECSO's were 0.85 and 0.48/o,
 respectively. In contrast, only 100% permeate water caused
 significant increases in terata.
 Specifications:  Pub. in Archives Environmental Contamina-
 tion and  Toxicology, v21 P233-244 1991. See also  PB87-
 174934 and PB86-208543. 9p.
 Subject index keywords: Water pollution control,  Creosote,
 Ground water, Phenol/pentachloro, Water pollution effects,
 Superfund.
1439  Emerging Technologies: Bio-Recovery Systems
 Removal and Recovery of Metal Ions from Groundwater
 Order Number PB90-252594CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
  Bio-Recovery Systems, Inc., LasCruces, NM.; Environmental
  Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk Reduction
  Engineering Lab; Aug 90
  A series of laboratory tests and an on-site pilot scale demon-
  stration of Bio-Recovery Systems' AlgaSORB technology for
  the removal and recovery of mercury-contaminated ground-
  water  were conducted  under the SITE  program.  Optimum
  conditions were  determined for mercury binding to Alga-
  SORB  Conditions  under which  mercury could be stripped
  from AlgaSORB were developed. On-site, pilot scale demon-
  strations with  a portable waste treatment system incorporat-
  ing columns containing two different AlgaSORB preparations
  confirmed laboratory tests.  Over 500 bed volumes of mercu-
  ry-contaminated  groundwater could  be successfully  treated
  before regeneration of the system was required. Mercury was
  removed to levels below  the discharge limit of 10 micro-
  gram/L.
  Specifications:  See also  Appendices, PB90-252602. Spon-
  sored by Environmental Protection Agency,  Cincinnati,  OH.
  Risk Reduction Engineering Lab. 55p.
  Subject index keywords: Mercury(Metal),  Water pollution
  control, Ground water, Superfund, Biological recovery.

 1440  Emerging Technologies: Bio-Recovery Systems
   Removal and Recovery of Metal Ions from Groundwater.
   AppondiCGS
   Order Number PB90-252602CDH, price:  PC A06/MF  A01
   Bio-Recovery Systems, lnc:, LasCruces,  NM.; Environmental
   Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk Reduction
   Engineering Lab; Aug 90
   Now in its fourth year, the Superfund Innovative Technology
   Evaluation (SITE) Program is  part of  EPA's research into
   cleanup methods for hazardous waste  sites around  the
   nation.  Through cooperative agreements with developers, al-
   ternative or innovative technologies are  refined at the bench-
   278

-------
                   HVe' Td then demonstrated at actual sites.
     each tp"d eva|uates extensive performance data on
     h^r,£n     f t0  "** In remedjation  decision-making for
     hazardous waste sites. The appendices include the laborato-
     IrP n^  TU'r! fr°m two '"^Pendent laboratories that
     were provided split samples from Bio-Recovery Systems Inc
     during the on-site pilot testing of Bio-Recoverys techndogy f
           trhemSH°f fmMrCUry,fr°m c<»nated groundwaters
           the period of November 7, 1989 to December 1  1989
                        a'SO PB9°-252594.  Sponsored by

                                ^^ °H' R'S

    ™       "de>:, keywords:  Mercury(Metal),  Water pollution
    control, Ground water, Superfund, Biological recovery
  1441   EPA Site Demonstration of BioTrol Aqueous
    Treatment System
    ?rten^Tbf P+B91-182279CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
    Science Applications International Corp., Paramus NJ •
    cSa?hASMkapM,NoEnvir°nmental Pr°te*ion Agency,
    Cincinnati, OH. Risk Reduction Engineering Lab- c1991
    BioTrors pilot scale, fixed-film  biological system was evaluat-
    ed, under the  EPA's  SITE program, for its effectiveness at
    SoVr?9wLentaCrfhIOrOPHhen°l fr°m g^ndwaterSe demon-
    stration was  performed  in the summer of 1989  at a  wood
    Preserving site in New Brighton, Minnesota. The system em
    ploys indigenous  microorganisms amended with a specific
    WPH nn t°h0phfn0|-de?rading bacte™™- Groundwater from a
    weH on the s.te was fed to the system at 1, 3, and 5 qpm
    with no pretreatment other than pH adjustment, nutrient  addT-
    ninft fmperature  control. Each flowrate was maintained
   for abou two weeks while samples were collected for exten
                    f T't(!he SyStem W3S ^Pable of elimlnat-
                    nt of the Pentachiorophenol in the ground-
           t  pr°duf'ng effluent with Pentachlorophenol  concen-
           to about 1  ppm.  At the lower  flows (1  and 3 gpm)
    ornnho T ***** ^^ " P6rCent>  and effluent PerS
   lorophenol  concentrations were well  below 05  ppm  The
   K?h~» «Stent!y prSdU°ed a comP'etely nontoxic  effluent
   T-n? L2•  t T?^ Review of other data Provided by Bio-
   T.ol indicates  that the  process  is also effective on other hy-
   drocarbons, mcluding  solvents  and fuels. The  system  ap-
   t^mfn !°^   a ?omPact and cost-effective treatment for  con-
   once 2SiZHW?nerS reT™9 minimal °Peratin9 atten*on
   mem AssSS./00^19111 (C)  1"1"Air & WaSte Ma™^
  Specifications:  Pub. in Jnl. of  the Air  Pollution Control As-
  sociation  v41  n2 P228-233 Feb 91. Prepared in cooperation
  with BioTrol, Chaska, MN. Sponsored bj' Environmental Pro-
  LabI. 9np  9enCy>  Cincinnati' OH-  R|sk Reduction Engineering

  S^oV"?6n  keywords: Biological treatment, Water pollu-
  ton control, Ground water, Waste disposal, BioTrol aqueous

  Sn Program     '   ^^ 'nn°VatiVe Technol°9y EvaS-

1442  Estimating Potential for Occurrence of DNAPL at
  ouperfund Sites
  Order Number PB92-963338CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Emergency and Remedial Response; Jan 92
  The presence of Dense  Nonaqueous Phase  Liquids (DNAPL)
  n soi s and aquifers can control  the ultimate success or fail-
  ure of remediation at a hazardous waste  site. Because of the
                                                                      TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION:
                                                                                          Groundwater Technologies
   complex nature of  DNAPL transport  and  fate,  however
   DNAPL may often be undetected by direct methods, leading
   to incomplete site assessments and inadequate remedial de-
   signs. Sites affected  by DNAPL may require a different con-
   ceptual  framework to develop effective  characterization and
   remedial actions. To help site personnel  determine if DNAPL-
   based characterization strategies should be employed at  a
   particular site, a guide for estimating the potential for DNAPL
   occurrence was developed. The approach, which uses histor-
   ical site  use information and site characterization data  is de-
   scribed in the fact sheet.
   Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order de-
   posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S  Canada
   and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
   paper copy or microfiche. 11 p.
   Subject  index  keywords:  Hazardous  materials,  Pollution
   control, Superfund, Dense nonaqueous phase liquids.

1443  Evaluating the Effectiveness of Ground Water
   Extraction Systems
   Order Number PB91-177386CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
   Robert S. Kerr Environmental Research Lab Ada OK •
  CH2M/HHI, Reston, VA; C1991
  The most common process for remediating  contaminated
  ground water is extraction and treatment. Data from 19 on-
  going and completed ground water extraction systems  were
  collected and analyzed to evaluate the effectiveness of this
  process in achieving cleanup concentration goals for ground
  water. This analysis indicated several trends including: con-
  tainment of ground water plumes was usually achieved; con-
  taminant  concentrations dropped  significantly initially fol-
  lowed by a leveling out;  after the  period of initial rapid de-
  cline, the continued decreases in concentration were usually
  slower than anticipated; and  certain data important  to  opti-
  mizing system design and operation had often not been col-
  lected during the site characterization phase. Factors limiting
  the achievement of cleanup concentration goals fell into four
  basic categories: hydrogeological factors; contaminant-relat-
  ed factors; continued  migration  from source areas and the
  size  of the plume itself; and system design factors. The find-
  ings of the study indicate that ground water extraction is an
 effective method for preventing  additional migration of con-
 taminant plumes  and achieving risk reduction. However the
 findings indicate that in  many situations,  it  may not be practi-
 cable to rely solely on ground water extraction and treatment
 to achieve health-based cleanup concentrations throughout
 the contaminated  zone  and fulfill the primary goal of return-
 ing ground water to beneficial use. This suggests several
 recommendations for improving ground  water response ac-
tions  including:  actions to  contain contaminant  plumes
should be initiated early; data on vertical variation of hydrau-
lic conductivity, distribution of the  contaminant  mass, and
partitioning of contaminants to soil or a stationary phase in
the saturated zone should generally be collected as part of
the site characterization  process; remedial actions  should be
implemented in  stages to better utilize information on aquifer
response as the system  is being designed and implemented-
remedial actions should be monitored and modified  during
operation to optimize system efficiency; and methods  to en-
hance extraction effectiveness and efficiency  should be con-
sidered.
                                                                                                               279

-------
TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION:
Groundwater Technologies
  Specifications:  Pub.  in Ground Water Monitoring  Review,
  v11 n1  p119-124, Winter 1991. Sponsored  by CH2M/Hill,
  Reston, VA. 8p.
  Subject Index keywords: Water pollution control, Ground
  water, Extraction, Cleanup operations.
 1444 Evaluation of Ground-Water Extraction Remedies:
  Phase 2. Volume "f. Summary Report
  Order Number PB92-963346CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Emergency and Remedial Response; Feb 92
  The report is the second phase of a study to evaluate the
  effectiveness of ground-water extraction systems being used
  to remediate ground-water contamination at hazardous waste
  sites. The report was prepared in  two volumes. Volume 1
  contains an executive summary and chapters which discuss
  the purpose, methodologies, and conclusion of the project.
  Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
  posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
  and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
   paper  copy or microfiche.  Supersedes PB90-183583. See
   also PB92-963347. 38p.
   Subject Index keywords: Ground water, Hazardous materi-
   als, Remedial action, Water  pollution control, Extraction,
   Cleanup operations.
 1445 Evaluation of Ground-Water Extraction Remedies:
   Phase 2. Volume 2. Case Studies and Updates
   Order Number PB92-963347CDH, price: PC A19/MF A04
   Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC.  Office of
   Emergency and Remedial Response; Feb 92
   The  report  is the second phase of a study to evaluate the
   effectiveness of ground-water extraction systems being used
   to remediate ground-water contamination at hazardous waste
   sites. The report was  prepared in two volumes. Volume 2 dis-
   cusses the case studies-individual analyses of each  of the
   24 sites associated with the project.
   Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
   posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
   and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
   paper copy or microfiche.  Supersedes PB90-274440. See
   also PB92-963346. 450p.
   Subject Index keywords: Ground water, Hazardous  materi-
   als, Remedial  action,  Water pollution control,  Extraction,
   Cleanup operations.
  1446  Evaluation of Ground-Water Extraction Remedies.
    Volume 2. Case Studies 1-19
    Order Number PB90-274440CDH, price: PC A19
    CH2M Hill Southeast, inc.,  Reston, VA.; Environmental
    Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of Emergency
    arid Remedial Response; Oct 89
    The  volume  was prepared  as  part of  an  evaluation  of
    ground-water extraction remedies  completed under EPA
    Contract No. 68-W8-0098.  It presents 19 case studies of in-
    dividual sites where ground-water extraction  systems have
    been implemented. The case studies present site character-
    istics and discuss factors that have  influenced the success
    of the remedial activities.
    Specifications:   See  also  PB90-183583  and  Volume 3,
     PB90-274457. Portions of this document are not fully legible.
    Sponsored by Environmental Protection Agency, Washington,
     DC. Office of Emergency and Remedial Response. 599p.
  Subject index keywords: Ground water, Hazardous materi-
  als, United States, Extraction, Waste treatment, Superfund.

1447  Evaluation of Ground-Water Extraction Remedies.
  Volume 3. General Site Data: Data Base Reports
  Order Number PB90-274457CDH, price: PC A06/MF A01
  CH2M Hill Southeast, Inc., Reston, VA.; Environmental
  Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of Emergency
  and Remedial Response; Oct 89
  The volume is the third of a three-volume report document-
  ing the results of an evaluation  of ground-water extraction
  remedies at hazardous waste sites. It consists of a collection
  of 112 data base reports presenting general information on
  sites where ground-water extraction systems are in various
  stages of planning or implementation.
  Specifications:   See  also Volume 2, PB90-274440 Spon-
  sored by Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DO.
  Office of Emergency and Remedial Response. 121 p.
  Subject index keywords: Ground water, Hazardous materi-
  als, Extraction, Water pollution control, Superfund.

 1448  Evaluation of the Likelihood of DNAPL Presence at
  NPL Sites: National Results
  Order Number PB93-963343CDH, price: PC A06/MF A02
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Sep 93
  The document presents the  results of a survey undertaken
  by the  U.S.  Environmental  Protection  Agency's  (EPAs)
  Office of Emergency  and Remedial  Response  (Superfund).
  The survey was designed to estimate the  proportion of Na-
  tional  Priorities List (NPL) sites where  Dense Nonaqueous
   Phase Liquids (DNAPLs) may be present.  Earlier studies by
   OERR  suggested that DNAPLs  may be more  common  at
   hazardous waste sites than previously thought, and may act
   as a continuing source of contamination thus reducing the
   ability of pump-and-treat systems to  attain  cleanup  goals
   within expected  timeframes (Evaluation of Ground Water Ex-
   traction  Remedies, Phase II, EPA 9355.4-05).  The study rep-
   resents  the first systematic nation-wide review of NPL sites
   designed to  estimate the extent of subsurface  DNAPL con-
   tamination.
   Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
   posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
   and Mexico; all  others $400). Single copies also available in
   paper copy or microfiche. 119p.
   Subject index  keywords: Superfund, Hazardous  materials,
   Liquid wastes.
  1449  Evaluation of Unsaturated/Valdose Zone Models for
   Superfund Sites                        .„„„„,- Ano
    Order Number PB94-157765CDH, price: PC A09/MF A03
    Oklahoma Agricultural Experiment Station, Stillwater.; Robert
    S. Kerr Environmental Research Lab., Ada, OK;  Mar 94
    Mathematical models of water  and chemical  movement in
    soils are being used as decision aids for defining ground-
    water protection  practices  for  Superfund sites.  Numerous
    transport models exist for predicting movement and degrada-
    tion of hazardous chemical through soils. Many of these re-
    quire extensive input parameters which  include uncertainty
    due  to soil variability  and  unknown  future weather.  The
    impact of uncertain model parameters upon the model output
    is  not  known.  Model users need an  understanding  of this
    impact so  they can  measure the appropriate parameters for
   280
                                                                                                       i, ,',lli:,,.i,iii, < It1 iliiU'l1

-------
                                                                    TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION:
                                                                                        Groundwater Technologies
   the site and incorporate the model prediction uncertainty into
   their decisions. The report  summarizes research findings
   which address the sensitivity and uncertainty of model output
   due to uncertain input parameters. The objective of the re-
   search was to determine the sensitivity and uncertainty of
   travel time, concentration,  mass loading and pulse width of
   contaminants  at the water table  due to uncertainty  in soil
   properties such as  organic  carbon  content,  bulk density,
   water content, and hydraulic conductivity. Chemical proper-
   ties, such as organic carbon  partition coefficient and  degra-
   dation half-life, were also examined. The four models select-
   ed for this analysis were RITZ, VIP, CMLS and HYDRUS.
   Specifications:    See  also  PB94-157773.  Sponsored  by
   Robert S. Kerr Environmental  Research  Lab., Ada, OK. 197p.
   Subject index keywords:  Hazardous materials, Water flow,
   Sediment transport, Ground water, Superfund.

 1450  Extraction of Mercury from  Groundwater Using
   Immobilized Algae
   Order Number PB92-121367CDH, price:  PC A02/MF A01
   Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk
   Reduction Engineering Lab; c1991
   Bio-recovery Systems Inc., conducted  a project under the
   Emerging Technology portion of the United States  Environ-
   mental  Protection  Agency's  (EPAs)  Superfund  Innovative
   Technology Evaluation (SITE)  Program to evaluate the ability
   of immobilized algae to absorb mercury from contaminated
   groundwater in laboratory studies  and pilot-scale field tests.
   Algae biomass was incorporated  in a permeable polymeric
   matrix. The product, AlgaSORB, packed into absorption col-
   umns^ exhibited excellent flow characteristics, and functioned
   as a  'biological'  ion exchange resin. A  sequence of eleven
   laboratory tests demonstrated the ability of the product to
   absorb mercury from groundwater  that contained high  levels
   of total dissolved solids and hard water components. Howev-
   er, use of a single AlgaSORB preparation yielded non-repeat-
   able results with samples collected at different times of the
   year. The strategy of extracting the groundwater through two
   columns containing different times of the year. The  strategy
   of extracting the groundwater through two columns  contain-
   ing different preparations of AlgaSORB  was developed and
   proved successful  in laboratory and  pilot-scale field  tests.
   Field test  results indicate that  AlgaSORB could be economi-
   cally competitive with ion  exchange resins  for removal of
   mercury, with the advantage  that  hardness and other dis-
  solved solids do not  appear to compete with heavy metals
  for binding capacity. (Copyright (c) 1991-Air and Waste Man-
  agement Association.)
  Specifications: Pub. in  Jnl. of Air and  Waste Management
  Association, v41 n10 p1387-1393 Oct 91. 9p.
  Subject   index   keywords:   Water   pollution   control
  Mercury(Metal),      Biological     treatment,     Algae,
  Absorption(Biology), Ground water,  AlgaSORB.

1451  Facilitated Transport. Series  of Issue Papers (3rd)
  Order Number PB91-133256CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
  Robert S. Kerr Environmental Research Lab.,  Ada, OK; Aug
  89
  Facilitated transport is an issue identified  by the Regional Su-
  perfund Ground-Water Forum as a concern of Superfund de-
  cision-makers. The issue  paper presents  the various facilitat-
  ed transport mechanisms that have been verified in laborato-
  ry experiments. Additionally, the practical  considerations con-
   cerning the potential role of facilitated transport at Superfund
   sites are presented.
   Specifications:  7p.
   Subject index keywords: Ground water, Hazardous materi-
   als, Water pollution, Superfund, Environmental transport.

 1452  Field Demonstration of the UV/Oxidation
   Technology to Treat Ground Water Contaminated with
   VOCs
   Order Number PB91-163741CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
   Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk
   Reduction Engineering Lab.; PRC Environmental
   Management, Inc., Chicago, IL; c1990
   The  paper  presents the field evaluation results of the ultra-
   violet  radiation  (UV)/oxidation  technology  developed  by
   Ultrox  International,  Santa Ana,  California. The field evalua-
   tion was performed at the Lorentz Barrel & Drum (LB&D) site
   in San Jose, California under the Superfund Innovative Tech-
   nology Evaluation program in February and March of 1989.
   The  UV/oxidation technology uses UV radiation, ozone, and
   hydrogen peroxide to oxidize organic contaminants in water.
   At the LB&D  site, this technology was evaluated in treating
   ground water contaminated with volatile organic compounds
   (VOCs). The Ultrox system achieved VOC removals greater
   than  90 percent. Most VOCs were removed through chemical
   oxidation. However,  for a few VOCs,  such as 1,1,1-trichlor-
   oethane  and  1,1-dichloroethane, stripping  also contributed
  toward removal. The treated ground water met the applicable
  discharge standards for discharge into a local  waterway  at
  95 percent confidence level. There were no harmful air emis-
  sions to  the atmosphere from  the Ultrox system,  which  is
  equipped with an off-gas treatment unit. (Copyright (c) 1990--
  Air & Waste Management Association.)
  Specifications: Pub. in Jnl. of the Air and Waste Manage-
  ment Association, v40 n4, Apr 90. Prepared in cooperation
  with PRC Environmental Management, Inc., Chicago,  IL.  10p.
  Subject index keywords: Water pollution control,  Volatile
  organic compounds,  Ground water, Ultraviolet radiation,  Oxi-
  dation,  Ultrox system.

1453  Field Evaluation of the UV/Oxidation Technology to
  Treat Contaminated Groundwater. Proceedings of the
  National Conference (10th). Held in Washington, DC. on
  November 27-29,  1989
  Order Number PB90-221672CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk
  Reduction Engineering Lab.; PRC Engineering, Inc., Chicago,
  IL;c1990
  The paper presents the field evaluation results  of the ultra-
  violet  radiation  (UV)Xoxidation   technology  developed  by
  Ultrox International, Santa Ana,  California. The field  evalua-
  tion of the technology was performed at the Lorentz Barrel
  and Drum (LB and D) site in San Jose, California, under the
  Superfund Innovative Technology Evaluation (SITE) program
  from February 27 through March 10, 1989. The UV/oxidation
  technology uses UV radiation, ozone, and hydrogen peroxide
  to oxidize organic contaminants  present in water. At the LB
  and D site, this technology was evaluated in treating  ground
  water contaminated with volatile organic compounds (VOCs).
  The Ultrox system achieved VOC removals greater than 90
  percent. The majority of VOCs were removed through chemi-
  cal oxidation. The  treated ground water met the applicable
  discharge standards (NPDES) for disposal  into Coyote Creek
                                                                                                               281

-------
TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION:
Groundwater Technologies
  at 90 percent confidence level. There were no harmful air
  emissions from the Ultrox system into the atmosphere.
  Specifications: Prepared in cooperation with PRC Engineer-
  ing, Inc., Chicago,  IL 10p.
  Subject Index keywords: Ground water, Hazardous materi-
  als, Water treatment.
1454  Filtration of Ground Water Samples for Metals
  Analysis
  Order Number PB90-185182CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
  Robert S. Kerr Environmental Research Lab., Ada, OK.;
  Illinois State Water Survey Div., Champaign. Aquatic
  Chemistry Section; c1989
  The filtration of a  ground water samples with 0.45 microme-
  ter filters for  determination of 'dissolved' metals is not only
  Inaccurate for distinguishing between  dissolved and particu-
  late phases, but if used for estimates  of mobile contaminant
  loading in a given aquifer, may result in significant underesti-
  matfons.
  Specifications:  Pub. in Hazardous Waste and  Hazardous
  Materials, v6  n4 p385-393 Nov 89. Prepared in cooperation
  with Illinois State Water Survey Div., Champaign.  Aquatic
  Chemistry Section. 11 p.
  Subject  index keywords:  Hazardous  materials, Filtration,
  Water analysis, Ground water, Metals, Waste disposal, Water
  pollution  sampling, Water pollution detection.
1455  Ground-Water Issue: Characterizing Soils for
  Hazardous Waste Site Assessments
  Order Number PB91-921294CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington,  DC. Office of
  Emergency and Remedial Response; Mar 91
  The Regional Superfund Ground  Water  Forum is a group of
  ground-water scientists representing EPA's Regional Offices,
  organized  to  exchange  up-to-date information  related  to
  ground-water  remediation  at  hazardous  waste  sites. Soil
  characterization at hazardous waste sites is an issue identi-
  fied by the forum" as a concern of CERCLA decision-makers.
  Soil characterization  provides  data types required for deci-
  sionmaking in three distinct RI/FS tasks: (1)  Determination
  of the nature and extent of soil  contamination. (2) Risk as-
  sessment,  and determination of risk-based  soil  clean-up
  levels. (3) Determination of the potential effectiveness of soil
  remediation alternatives.
  Specifications: Paper copy available  on Standing  Order, de-
  posit account required (minimum  deposit $200  U.S., Canada,
  and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
  paper copy or microfiche. 17p.
  Subject  index keywords: Ground water, Soil classification,
  Hazardous materials, Superfund.
 1456  Ground-Water Issue: Potential Sources  of Error in
  Ground-Wafer Sampling at Hazardous Waste Sites
  Order Number PB§4-12i688CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
  Nevada Univ. System, Las Vegas. Desert Research Inst;
  Environmental Monitoring Systems Lab., Las Vegas, NV; Aug
  92
  The paper is intended to familiarize RPMs, OSCs, and field
  personnel with the sources of error inherent to ground-water
  sampling, and the relative impact of these errors on sample
  representativeness. Elements of typical  sampling  protocol
  will be discussed in relation  to how  these sources of error
  can be identified and minimized. Some of the elements of
  sampling protocol to be addressed include monitoring well
  drilling, design, construction, and purging, sample collection
  methods and devices, sample  filtration, equipment decon-
  tamination,  sample transport and storage,  and analytical
  methods.
  Specifications:  See also PB91-181776. Sponsored by Envi-
  ronmental Monitoring Systems Lab., Las Vegas, NV. 29p.
  Subject index keywords: Superfund, Water pollution sam-
  pling, Ground water.

1457  Ground-Water Issue: The  Effects of Well Casing
  Material on Ground Water-Quality
  Order Number PB92-224724CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Solid Waste and Emergency Response. Army Engineer
  Waterways Experiment Station, Vicksburg, MS. Geotechnical
  Lab; Oct 91
  The Regional Superfund Ground Water Forum is a group of
  ground-water scientists representing U.S. Environmental Pro-
  tection Agency's (U.S. EPA's) Regional Offices, organized to
  exchange up-to-date information related to ground-water re-
  mediation at hazardous waste  sites. Well casing materials
  used at hazardous waste sites  is an issue identified by the
  forum as a concern of CERCLA decision makers. All aspects
  of a ground-water  sampling program  have the  potential to
  affect the composition of a  ground-water sample. The high
  degree of accuracy (parts per billion (ppb) range) required of
  some chemical analysis dictates that  all potential sources of
  error of a ground-water sampling  program be identified and
  sources of error in such aspects be minimized.  Selection of
  the proper casing material  for  monitoring wells  has been a
  subject of much controversy since the publication of the U.S.
  Specifications: Prepared in cooperation with Army Engineer
  Waterways Experiment Station,  Vicksburg, MS. Geotechnical
  Lab. 17p.
  Subject index  keywords:  Coverings, Water wells,  Water
  pollution, Superfund.

1458  Ground-Water Modeling Compendium. Model Fact
  Sheets, Descriptions, Applications and Assessment
  Framework
  Order Number PB93-207504CDH,  price: PC A08/MF A02
  Environmental Protection Agency,  Washington, DC. Office of
  Solid Waste and Emergency Response.; Wisconsin Univ.-
  Madison.**lnternational Ground Water Modeling Center,
  Indianapolis, IN; Oct 92
  Models can  be used  to guide and complement  field investi-
  gations, thereby improving  the  understanding of the conse-
  quences of  site-specific hydrogeologic conditions. However,
  models should not be used in lieu of field investigations and
  care must be taken to ensure that models are not misused.
  The intention of the Compendium is to: promote the  appro-
  priate  use of models by increasing users' awareness about
  the strengths, weaknesses and  inherent uncertainties associ-
  ated with ground-water models  and modeling in  general; and
  support model  users and decision-makers  by providing a
  convenient source of information  on  how to oversee model-
  ing projects, how certain models have been applied in  the
  context of  hazardous waste/Superfund programs, and  the
  characteristics of four specific ground-water models.
  Specifications:   Prepared  in  cooperation  with Wisconsin
  Univ.-Madison,  and  International  Ground  Water Modeling
  Center, Indianapolis, IN. 157p.
 282

-------
                                                                   TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION:
                                                                                       Groundwater Technologies
   Subject index keywords: Ground water movement, Path of
   pollutants, Model studies.

 1459  Ground Water Sampling for Metals Analyses.
   Superfund Ground Water Issue
   Order Number PB91-133249CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
   Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
   Emergency and Remedial Response; Mar 89
   Filtration of ground-water samples for metals analysis is an
   issue  identified by  the  Regional Superfund  Ground Water
   Forum  as  a  concern  of  Superfund  decision-makers.
   RSKERL-Ada and EMSL-Las Vegas  convened a technical
   committee of experts in the areas of ground-water geochem-
   istry, inorganic chemistry,  colloidal  transport and ground-
   water sampling technology to examine the issue and provide
   technical  guidance  based on current scientific information.
   The findings  and recommendations of the committee were
   that use of a 0.45 micron filter was not useful, appropriate or
   reproducible  in providing information  on metals mobility in
   ground-water systems, nor was it appropriate for determina-
   tion of truly 'dissolved' constituents in ground water. A  dual
   sampling  approach  was  recommended, with  collection of
   both filtered and unfiltered samples. This means that  added
   emphasis  is placed on appropriate well  construction meth-
   ods, materials and ground-water sampling procedures.
   Specifications: 8p.
   Subject index keywords: Ground water, Hazardous materi-
   als, Water pollution, Superfund.

1460  Guidance for Evaluating the Technical
   Impracticability of Ground-Water Restoration
   Order Number PB93-963507CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
   Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Sep 93
  The  document  outlines EPA's approach to evaluating  the
  technical impracticability of  attaining  requiredground-water
  cleanup levels and establishing alternative,  protective  reme-
  dial strategies where restoration is determined to be techni-
  cally impracticable.
  Specifications:  Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
  posit account  required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
  and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies  also available in
  paper copy or microfiche. 30p.
  Subject index  keywords:  Ground  water,  Water pollution
  control, Feasibility.

1461  Guide on Remedial Actions for Contaminated
  Ground Water
  Order Number PB90-272576CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Emergency and Remedial Response; Apr 89
  The fact sheet summarizes  the key issues  in the develop-
  ment, evaluation, and selection of ground  water Remedial
  Actions at Superfund sites, including CERCLA requirements,
  project planning, and remedial action objectives as presented
  in the comprehensive guidance.
  Specifications:  9p.
  Subject index keywords:  Ground water, Water  pollution,
  Superfund,  Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response.
 1462  Guide to Pump and Treat Groundwater Remediation
   Technology
   Order Number PB91-921356CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
   Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
   Emergency and Remedial Response; Nov 90
   The fact sheet summarizes how to use available hydrogeolo-
   gical and chemical data to determine when, where, and how
   pump-and-treat technology can be used successfully to con-
   tain and remediate contaminant plumes. It is based on Office
   of Research  and Development's Basics of Pump-and-Treat
   Ground-Water Remediation Technology, EPA/600/8-90/003.
   Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing  Order, de-
   posit account required (minimum deposit $150 U.S., Canada,
   and Mexico; all others $300). Single copies also available in
   paper copy or microfiche. 6p.
   Subject index  keywords: Superfund,  Waste management,
   Hazardous materials, Water pollution control,  Office  of Solid
   Waste and Emergency Response.

 1463  Hydrogeology and Results of Aquifer Tests in the
   Vicinity of a  Hazardous-Waste Disposal Site Near Byron,
   Illinois
   Order Number PB90-130188CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
   Geological Survey, Reston, VA. Water Resources Div.;
   Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC; Jul 89
   The  U.S. Geological Survey, in cooperation with the U.S. En-
   vironmental Protection Agency,  conducted  a  hydrogeologic
   investigation of a Superfund Site  near Byron, Illinois.  The
   purpose of the investigation was to determine  the hydrogeo-
   logic properties that control the movement of  water through
   the Galena-Platteville and St. Peter aquifers. These  are the
   primary domestic  water-supply aquifers  in the area. Move-
   ment of water in the dolomites is mainly through joints, frac-
   tures, and solution openings. Ground-water flow in  the study
   area is  from  the  salvage yard  northwestward to  the Rock
   River. Ground water recharges from the dolomite to the St.
   Peter aquifer beneath the salvage yard  and  discharges from
  the Quaternary alluvial aquifer at the river.  Analysis of the
  Galena-Platteville aquifer-test data indicates that the calculat-
  ed  aquifer transmissivity  ranges  from 490  to   670  feet
  squared per day,  and the  calculated specific yield  ranges
  from 0.017 to 0.140.
  Specifications:  Prepared in cooperation with Environmental
  Protection Agency, Washington, DC. 65p.
  Subject index keywords:  Hazardous materials, Hydrogeo-
  logy,  Waste disposal, Superfund site.

1464  Identification and Compilation of  Unsaturated/
  Vadose Zone Models
  Order Number PB94-157773CDH, price: PC A07/MF A02
  Colorado School of Mines, Golden. International Ground
  Water Modeling Center.; Robert S. Kerr Environmental
  Research Lab., Ada, OK; Mar 94
  The present report contains the result of research and infor-
  mation processing  activities supporting evaluation of the ca-
  pabilities  of various  unsaturated zone  flow and  transport
  models  in predicting  the  movement of hazardous  chemical
  through  soils to ground water.  It provides  an overview of
  major types of models applicable to problems in the unsatu-
  rated zone of the subsurface. As chemical transport in soils
  is often  driven by the movement of water, both flow  and
  chemical transport  models are included. To manage the rap-
  idly growing amount of information,  IGWMC  maintains a de-
                                                                                                              283

-------
TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION:
Groundwater Technologies
  scriptive model information system, MARS (Model Annotation
  Search and Retrieval  System). Detailed  information  on the
  reviewed models is presented in a series of tables.
  Specifications:   See also PB94-157765. Sponsored  by
  Robert S. Kerr Environmental Research Lab., Ada, OK. 137p.
  Subject Index keywords: Hazardous materials, Water flow,
  Sediment transport, Ground water, Superfund.

1465  in-situ Bioremedlation of Contaminated Ground
  Water
  Order Number PB92-224336CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington,  DC. Office of
  Solid Waste and Ertiergency Response; Feb 92
  In-situ bioremediation,  where applicable, appears to be a po-
  tential cost-effective and environmentally acceptable remedi-
  ation technology. Suflita  (1989) identified characteristics of
  the ideal candidate site for successful implementation of in-
  situ bioremediation. These characteristics included: (1) a ho-
  mogeneous and permeable aquifer;  (2) a contaminant origi-
  nating from a single source; (3) a low ground-water gradient;
  (4) no free product; (5)  no soil  contamination;  and (6) an
  easily degraded, extracted, or immobilized contaminant. Ob-
  viously, few sites meet these characteristics. However, devel-
  opment of information concerning site specific geological and
  microbiological  characteristics of the aquifer, combined with
  knowledge concerning potential chemical, physical, and bio-
  chemical fate of the wastes present, can be used to develop
  a bioremediation strategy for a less-than-ideal site.
  Specifications:  See also PB89-219976.  13p.
  Subject index keywords: Water pollution control, Biological
  treatment! Ground water,  Remedial action.
 1466  In situ Treatment of Contaminated Ground Water:
  An Inventory of Research and Field Demonstrations and
  Strategies for Improving Ground Water Remediation
  Technologies
  Order Number PB93-193720CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Jan 93
  The predominance of ground-water contamination at hazard-
  ous waste  sites and the dearth of methods to efficiently treat
  this contamination Is a problem that the U.S.  Environmental
  Protection  Agency  (EPA)  is examining.  The contaminated
  ground water found at most Superfund sites is  often the limit-
  ing factor for complete site remediation. The purpose of the
  document  is to  describe recent research, development and
  application of  technologies that  either treat ground-water
  contaminants  in place or improve the solubility and  mobility
  of contaminants to enhance pump-and-treat remediation ef-
  fectiveness. The report discusses techniques that can be ap-
  pliedin situ and excludes pumping methodologies or surface
  treatment systems. In addition, the publication presents con-
  clusions based on observations of the survey. Finally, strate-
  gies for  action  for  stakeholders  concerned with  in  situ
  ground-water  technology development  are presented. The
  study has not defined the extent or activities of research and
  development outside of EPA-supported groups.
  Specifications: See  also PB92-224336. 22p.
  Subject index keywords: Ground water, Water  pollution
  control,  Remedial aption, Waste disposal, Hazardous materi-
  als, In-situ processing.
1467  Measurement of Hydraulic Conductivity
  Distributions: A Manual of Practice
  Order Number PB91-211938CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
  Auburn Univ., AL. Dept. of Civil Engineering.; Geological
  Survey, Denver, CO.*Robert S. Kerr Environmental Research
  Lab., Ada, OK;  Mar 90
  The ability of hydrologists to  perform field measurements of
  aquifer hydraulic  properties must be enhanced in order to
  significantly improve the capacity to solve ground water con-
  tamination problems at Superfund  and other sites. The  pri-
  mary purpose of the manual is to provide new methodologies
  for  measuring  K(z), the distribution of  horizontal hydraulic
  conductivity  in  the vertical direction in  the vicinity of a test
  well. Measurements in nearby wells can then  be used to esti-
  mate  three-dimensional distributions. As dispersion-dominat-
  ed models  (particularly two-dimensional, vertically-averaged
  models) approach their limitations, it is becoming increasingly
  important to develop two-dimensional vertical profile or fully
  three-dimensional advection-dominated transport  models in
  order to significantly increase the  ability to  understand  and
  predict contaminant transport,  reaction, and degradation in
  the field. Such models require the measurement of hydraulic
  conductivity  distributions, K(z), rather than vertically averaged
  values in the  form  of transmissivities.  Three devices  for
  measuring  K(z)  distributions (the  impeller  flowmeter,  the
  heat-pulse flowmeter, and a  multi-level  slug test apparatus)
  are described  in detail, along with  application and data re-
  duction procedures. Results of the various methods are com-
  pared with each  other and with  the results of tracer studies.
  The flowmeter approach emerged  as the best candidate for
  routine K(z) measurements.  Impeller meters are  now avail-
  able commercially, and the more sensitive flowmeters (heat
  pulse and electromagnetic) are expected to be available in
  the near future.
  Specifications:   Prepared in cooperation  with Geological
  Survey, Denver,  CO. Sponsored by Robert  S. Kerr Environ-
  mental Research Lab., Ada, OK. 73p.
  Subject index keywords: Water pollution, Hydraulic conduc-
  tivity, Aquifers.
 1468  Membrane Treatment of Wood Preserving Site
  Groundwater  by SBP Technologies, Inc. Applications
  Analysis Report
  Order Number PB94-131646CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk
  Reduction Engineering Lab; Aug 93
  The document provides an evaluation of the SBP Technol-
  ogies, Inc.  (SBP)  formed-in-place  membrane hyperfiltration
  process. The  purpose of the technology is to reduce the
  volume of waste  requiring  further treatment through such
  techniques as  immobilization or destruction.  In hyperfiltration,
  pollutants are  separated  on the basis  of molecular weight,
  molecular size, polarity, or charge. The report  summarizes
  the utility and  application of  SBP's membrane system to the
  treatment of organic contaminated wastewater. This analysis
  utilizes information from the  Superfund  Innovative Technolo-
  gy Evaluation  (SITE) Program's demonstration at the  Ameri-
  can Creosote Works wood preserving site in Pensacola,  Flor-
  ida as well as data from other SBP investigations. Conclu-
  sions were  reached concerning the technological effective-
  ness and economics of the process and its  suitability for use
  at other sites and with other  waste waters.
  Specifications:  56p.
 284

-------
                                                                   TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION:
                                                                                      Groundwater Technologies
  Subject index  keywords: Superfund, Water pollution con-
  trol, Filtration, Membranes.

 1469  Methods for Evaluating the Attainment of Cleanup
  Standards. Volume 2. Ground Water
  Order Number PB94-138815CDH, price: PC A16/MF A03
  Westat, Inc., Rockville, MD. Research Div.; Dynamac Corp
  Rockville, MD.**SRA Technologies, Inc., Alexandria,
  VA.*Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC
  Statistical Policy Branch; Jul 92
  The reference document provides regional project managers,
  on-site coordinators, and their contractors with sampling and
  analysis methods for evaluating whether ground  water reme-
  diation has met  pre-established cleanup standards for one or
  more chemical contaminants at a hazardous waste site. The
  verification of cleanup by evaluating a site relative to a clean-
  up standard  or an applicable  or relevant and appropriate re-
  quirement (ARAR) is mandated in Section 121 of the Super-
  fund  Amendments and  Reauthorization  Act (SARA). The
  document, the second  in a series, provides  sampling and
  data analysis methods for the purpose of verifying attainment
  of a cleanup standard in ground water. The first volume ad-
  dresses evaluating  attainment in soils  and solid  media.
  Volume 2 presents statistical methods which can be used to
  address the uncertainty of whether a site  has met a cleanup
  standard.
  Specifications:  See also Volume 1, PB89-234959. Prepared
  in cooperation with Dynamac Corp., Rockville, MD., and SRA
  Technologies, Inc., Alexandria, VA.  Sponsored  by Environ-
  mental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Statistical  Policy
  Branch. 358p.
  Subject index keywords:  Hazardous materials, Standards,
  Ground water, Pollution control.
1470  New Approach and Methodologies  for
  Characterizing the Hydrogeologic Properties of Aquifers
  Order Number PB90-187063CDH, price: PC A11/MF A02
  Auburn Univ., AL Dept. of Civil Engineering.; Robert S.  Kerr
  Environmental Research Lab., Ada, OK; Jan 90
  In the authors' opinion, the ability of hydrologists to perform
  field measurements of  aquifer hydraulic properties must be
  enhanced if they are to  improve significantly the capacity to
  solve ground water  contamination problems  at Superfund
  and other sites. Therefore, the primary purpose of the report
  is to provide  motivation and new methodology  for measuring
  K(z), the distribution of horizontal hydraulic conductivity in the
  vertical direction in the vicinity  of a test well. Measurements
  in nearby wells can then be used to build up three-dimen-
  sional  distributions. For completeness, and to enhance the
  usefulness of the report as a field manual,  existing methodol-
  ogy for the  measurement  of  effective porosity,  vertical hy-
  draulic conductivity, storativity  and hydraulic head, are pre-
  sented also.  It is argued that dispersion-dominated models,
  particularly    two-dimensional,   vertically-averaged   (areal)
  models, have been pushed about as far as they can go, and
  that two-dimensional vertical profile or fully three-dimensional
  advection-dominated transport models are necessary if they
  are to increase significantly the ability to understand and pre-
  dict contaminant transport, reaction, and degradation in the
  field.  Such models require the measurement of hydraulic
  conductivity distributions, K(z), rather than vertically averaged
  values in the form of transmissivities.
  Specifications:  Sponsored by  Robert S. Kerr Environmental
  Research Lab., Ada, OK. 237p.
  Subject index keywords: Aquifers, Hydrogeology, Water
  pollution,  Waste  disposal,  Ground water,  Mathematical
  models, Environmental transport.

 1471  Performance Evaluations of Pump-and-Treat
  Remediations
  Order Number PB92-114461CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
  Keely (Joseph F.), Portland, OR.; Robert S. Kerr
  Environmental Research Lab., Ada, OK; Oct 89
  The report contains an overview of the processes affecting
  the mobility of contaminants through the subsurface, and the
  ability to pump the contaminants from the subsurface  for
  treatment. It points out the limitations of pump-and-treat re-
  mediation techniques and stresses the importance of proper
  site characterization and the relevance of computer modeling
  as a performance evaluation technique.
  Specifications:   See  also  PB90-274549.  Sponsored  by
  Robert S. Kerr Environmental Research Lab., Ada, OK. 21 p.
  Subject  index keywords: Water pollution, Ground water,
  Water treatment.

 1472  Potential Sources of Error in Ground-Water
  Sampling at Hazardous Waste Sites. Ground  Water Issue
  Order Number PB94-134376CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Center for
  Environmental Research Information; Aug 92
  The  Regional Superfund Ground Water Forum  is a group of
  ground-water scientists representing the U.S.  EPA's Regional
  Superfund Offices  that was organized to exchange up-to-
  date information related  to ground-water remediation  at Su-
  perfund  sites.  The paper  is intended to familiarize  RPMs,
  OSCs, and field personnel with the sources of error inherent
  to ground-water sampling,  and the relative impact of these
  errors on sample  representativeness.  Elements of  typical
  sampling protocol will be discussed in relation to how these
  sources  of error can be identified and minimized.
  Specifications: See also  DE88014685, PB91-133249, and
  PB92-114503. 30p.
  Subject   index keywords: Hazardous  materials, Ground
  water, Sampling.

1473   Remediation Completed: But Is the Groundwater
  Meeting the Safe Drinking Water Act Requirements.
  Haztech International 90. Held in Houston, Texas on May
  8-10, 1990
  Order Number PB90-262999CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk
  Reduction Engineering Lab; May 90
  Groundwater treatment is a theme that runs through several
  of EPA's programs including Drinking Water, Superfund, Un-
  derground Storage Tanks, RCRA, etc. Frequently the same
  terms are used in the different programs with quite different
  meanings. For example, the phrase 'pump and  treat' means
  one thing when one is considering treating groundwater for
  potable purposes and something quite different for superfund
  remediation.  Another  confusing term  is 'site  remediation'.
  Site  remediation can  mean  different things  to different
  people depending on their particular point-of-view.  Still an-
  other problem is the development of technology under one
  program  that could  be used effectively in another program.
  Institutional barriers  frequently limit the transfer  of useful re-
  search between programs.  The purpose of the paper is to
                                                                                                              285

-------
TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION:
Incineration & Thermal Technologies
  discuss  technology research being conducted in drinking
  water that might be useful to some of these other programs.
  Specifications:  22p.
  Subject index  keywords:  Ground water,  Potable  water,
  Drinking water.

1474  Subsurface Contamination Reference Guide
  Order Number PB91-921292CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Emergency and Remedial Response; Oct 90
  The guide was developed to provide a source of information
  pertaining to important fate and transport properties for a va-
  riety of contaminants commonly found in ground water at Su-
  perfund  sites. The information may help to focus site investi-
  gation  efforts and identify  early-on potential  remediation
  strategies. Information pertaining to contaminat  fate  and
  transport properties have been presented in  tabular form and
  provided as separately published charts for easy reference.
  Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
  posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
  and Mexico;  all others $400). Single copies also available in
  paper copy or microfiche. Package includes  three parts: Ref-
  erence Guide; Reference Tables 1  and 2  (EPA/540/2-90/
  011A); Reference Table 3 (EPA/540/2-90/011B). 26p.
  Subject index keywords: Ground water, Hazardous materi-
  als, Superfund.

1475  Suggested ROD Language for Various Ground
  Water Remediation Options
  Order Number PB91-921325CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Emergency and Remedial Response; 10 Oct 90
  The directive provides supplemental guidance to the October
  18, 1989 OSWER directive 9355.4-03, entitled 'Consideration
  in Ground Water Remediation at Superfund  Sites,' which ex-
  arn'irSId  the role of ground water remediation  in Superfund
  cleanups and recommends modifications to the current ap-
  proach.  It offers suggested language for Records of Decision
  corresponding to the recommendations 1  and 2 from the
  OSWER Directive. The recommendations are: (1) initiation of
  early or interim response measures; and  (2)  provision for
  changes in the reriedy during implementation in the Record
  of Decision. The Directive offers standard language that may
  be employed, when appropriate, to correspond to site-specif-
  ic remediation scenarios.  Language is suggested for Final
  Actions, Contingency Measures/Goals, and Interim Actions.
  Specifications:  Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
  posit account required (minimum deposit $150 U.S., Canada,
  and Mexico; all others $300). Single copies also available in
  paper copy or microfiche. 10p.
  Subject index keywords:  Superfund, Waste management,
  Hazardous  materials,  Water pollution  control,  Remedial
  action,   Office of  Solid  Waste  and Emergency Response,
  Records of Decision.

1476  Superfund Ground Water  Issue: Accuracy of Depth
  to Water Measurements. 2nd in Series of  Issue Papers
  Order Number PB96-149840CDH, price: PC A01/MF A01
  Robert S. Kerr Environmental Research Lab., Ada,  OK; Aug
  89
  The accuracy of depth to water measurements is an issue
  identified by the Regional Superfund Ground Water forum as
  a cqncern of Superfund decision-makers as they attempt to
  determine direction of ground-water flow, areas of recharge
  or discharge, the hydraulic characteristics of aquifers, or the
  effects of manmade  stresses on the ground-water system.
  The wetted graduated steel tape, electrical and air line meth-
  ods are  discussed along with frequency of measurements.
  The graduated  steel  tape method is considered to  be the
  most accurate for  measuring the water level  in nonflowing
  wells.
  Specifications: 5p.
  Subject  index  keywords:  Ground water,  Water  levels,
  Water quality management, Water pollution, Superfund pro-
  gram.
1477  Superfund Ground Water Issue. Contaminant
  Transport in Fractured Media: Models for Decision
  Makers
  Order Number PB90-268517CDH, price:  PC A02/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington,  DC. Office of
  Emergency and Remedial Response; Aug 89
  The Regional Superfund Ground Water  Forum is a group of
  ground-water technical  specialists, representing EPA's Re-
  gional Superfund Offices, organized to  exchange up-to-date
  information related to ground-water remediation at Superfund
  sites. Mathematical models have a potentially  useful role to
  play in arriving  at  a  decision on the remedial action to be
  taken  at a contaminated site. Where there is a need for  a
  quantitative  estimate  of the threat to public health resulting
  from a particular course of action, of the estimated cost and
  time of clean-up for  a particular  remediation strategy, or of
  the results of other actions to be taken at a contaminated
  site, mathematical models have a greater potential to provide
  the needed  information than any other approach  to the prob-
  lem. For contaminated sites in  fractured rock, however, this
  potential has yet to be realized.
  Specifications:  10p.
  Subject  index keywords: Ground water, Hazardous materi-
  als, Superfund.


TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM

IMPLEMENTATION: Incineration &

Thermal  Technologies

1478  Evaluation of Commercially-Available Portable Gas
  Chromatographs
  Order Number PB93-121051CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
  IIT Research Inst.,  Chicago, IL; ManTech Environmental
  Technology, Inc., Research Triangle Park,
  NC.* Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle
  Park, NC. Atmospheric Research and Exposure Assessment
  Lab; 1992
  Six commercially-available portable  gas  Chromatographs
  (PGC) were evaluated at a Superfund site during startup of
  bioremediation.  Concentrations  of  volatile   organic  com-
  pounds  (VOC)  were slightly  above ambient  background
  levels. Concurrent colocated  grab  samples were collected
  periodically  in Summa-polished canisters. They were  ana-
  lyzed by Method TO-14 using a mass-sensitive detector. The
  grab samples served as  standards to assess the accuracy of
  data reported by the PGCs.
  Specifications:  See also PB88-211701. Prepared  in coop-
  eration with ManTech Environmental Technology, Inc., Re-
  search Triangle Park, NC. Sponsored by Environmental Pro-
286
                                                                                       ill	.viiii, ii.,;, iHitiiiii.	

-------
                                                                   TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION:
                                                                             Incineration & Thermal Technologies
  tection Agency,  Research Triangle Park, NC.  Atmospheric
  Research and Exposure Assessment Lab. 8p.
  Subject  index  keywords:  Chromatographic analysis,  Haz-
  ardous materials, Superfund.

1479  Evaluation of Portable Gas Chromatographs
  Order Number PB93-168813CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
  IIT Research Inst, Chicago, IL; ManTech Environmental
  Technology, Inc., Research Triangle Park, NC.**Battelle
  Columbus Labs., OH.*Environmental Protection Agency,
  Research Triangle Park, NC. Atmospheric Research and
  Exposure Assessment Lab; 1993
  Limits of detection, linearity of responses, and stability of re-
  sponse  factors  and  retention  times for five commercially-
  available portable  gas Chromatographs (PGC)  were deter-
  mined during laboratory evaluation. The PGCs were also op-
  erated  at the French  Limited  Superfund  site near Houston,
  TX during startup of bioremediation. Concentrations of vola-
  tile organic  compounds (VOC)  at the site were slightly above
  ambient background levels. Concurrent collocated grab sam-
  ples  were collected periodically in canisters and analyzed by
  Method TO-14  using a  mass-selective  detector. Canister
  data were taken  to indicate correct concentrations and were
  used to assess the accuracy of PGC data. Durability, reliabil-
  ity, and complexity  of  operation of PGCs were also evaluat-
  ed. The principal goal of the study was to determine the best
  way to use  each instrument as a monitor for airborne VOCs.
  Specifications:   See  also PB90-127374  and PB93-121051.
  Prepared in cooperation with ManTech Environmental Tech-
  nology, Inc., Research Triangle Park,  NC., and  Battelle Co-
  lumbus Labs., OH. Sponsored by Environmental  Protection
  Agency, Research Triangle Park, NC. Atmospheric Research
  and Exposure Assessment Lab. 14p.
  Subject index keywords: Gas chromatography, Volatile or-
  ganic compounds, Air pollution, Portable equipment.
1480  Mobile Incineration: An Analysis of the Industry
  Order Number PB90-255449CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
  Management Associates, Natick, MA.; Versar, Inc.,
  Springfield,  VA.* Environmental Protection Agency,
  Washington, DC.  Office of Solid Waste; 30 Jun 89
  The report examines the mobile incineration industry, includ-
  ing the supply of and demand  for mobile incineration arid an
  assessment of  the incineration  market.  It was prepared
  based on a  need to examine mobile incineration that became
  apparent during the  Environmental  Protection  Agency's
  (EPA) analysis of hazardous waste treatment capacity.  EPA
  wanted to evaluate whether mobile incinerators can absorb
  the demand that other treatment facilities,  such as fixed-
  based incinerators,  cannot handle.
  Specifications:   Prepared in  cooperation with Versar,  Inc.,
  Springfield,  VA.  Sponsored   by  Environmental Protection
  Agency, Washington, DC. Office of Solid Waste. 67p.
  Subject index keywords: Incinerators,  Mobile  equipment,
  Waste disposal, Hazardous materials.
1481  Mobile/Transportable Incineration Treatment
  Order Number PB91-228023CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
  Science Applications International Corp., Cincinnati, OH.;
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Emergency  and Remedial Response; Sep 90
  Incineration  treats organic contaminants in solids and liquids
  by subjecting them to temperatures typically  greater than
  10OOF in  the presence of. oxygen, which causes the volatili-
  zation, combustion, and  destruction  of  these  compounds.
  The bulletin describes mobile/transportable incineration sys-
  tems that can be moved to and subsequently removed from
  Superfund and other hazardous waste sites. It does not ad-
  dress other thermal  processes that operate at lower tem-
  peratures or those that operate at very  high temperatures,
  such as plasma arc. It is applicable to  a wide range of organ-
  ic wastes and  is generally not used treating inorganics and
  metals.  Mobile/transportable incinerators exhibit essentially
  the same  environmental  performance as  their  stationary
  counterparts. To date, 49 of  the  95 records of decision
  (RODs)  designating  thermal remedies at  Superfund sites
  have selected onsite incineration as an integral part of a pre-
  ferred treatment alternative. There are 22 commercial-scale
  units in  operation. The bulletin provides the latest perform-
  ance data,  site requirements, the status  of  the technology,
  and where to go for further information.
  Specifications:   Sponsored  by Environmental  Protection
  Agency, Washington,  DC. Office of Emergency and Remedial
  Response. 10p.
  Subject index keywords: Incineration, Portable equipment,
  Hazardous  materials, Waste treatment, Organic compounds.

1482  Operations and Research at the U.S. EPA
  Incineration Research Facility: Annual Report for FY89
  Order Number PB90-186339CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
  Acurex Corp., Jefferson, AR.; Environmental Protection
  Agency,  Cincinnati, OH. Risk Reduction Engineering Lab;  -
  Mar 90
  The  Environmental  Protection  Agency's Incineration Re-
  search Facility  in Jefferson, Arkansas,  is an experimental fa-
  cility which  houses two pilot-scale incinerators and the  asso-
  ciated waste handling emission control, process control, and
  safety equipment,  as well as  onsite laboratory facilities.
  During Fiscal Year  1989,  a major facility  expansion  and re-
  configuration construction effort was completed. Upon com-
  pletion of the construction, incineration testing at the Facility
  was resumed. Hazardous waste incinerator trace metal  emis-
  sion regulation  development for the Office  of Solid Waste
  and a Superfund site remediation treatability study for Region
  I and the Office of Emergency and Remedial  Response were
  major program support activities in Fiscal Year 1989.
  Specifications:  Sponsored  by Environmental Protection
  Agency,   Cincinnati,  OH.   Risk  Reduction  Engineering Lab.
  73p.
  Subject   index  keywords: Research  projects,  Test cham-
  bers, Hazardous materials, Waste disposal, Air pollution con-
  trol equipment, Soils, US EPA, Incineration, Air pollution sam-
  pling.

1483  Operations and Research at the U.S. EPA
  Incineration Research Facility: Annual Report for FY90
  Order Number PB91-182493CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
  Acurex Corp., Jefferson, AR.; Environmental Protection
  Agency,  Cincinnati, OH. Risk Reduction Engineering Lab; Apr
  91                                                .
  The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's Incineration Re-
  search Facility in Jefferson, Arkansas,  is an experimental fa-
  cility that houses two pilot-scale incinerators and the associ-
  ated waste  handling,  emission control, process  control, and
  safety equipment;  as well as  onsite laboratory facilities.
  During fiscal year 1990, two major test programs were com-
  pleted at the facility: an  evaluation of the thermal-stability-
                                                                                                               287

-------
TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION:
Incineration & Thermal Technologies
  based  principal organic hazardous constituent incinerability
  ranking for the Office of Solid Waste (OSW), and an incinera-
  bility evaluation  of five  contaminated materials  from the
  Purity Oil Sales and the McColl Superfund sites for Region 9
  and  the  Office  of  Emergency  and  Remedial  Response
  (OERR). In addition, results of two test programs completed
  In  FY89 were reported: an evaluation of the fate of  trace
  metals fed to a rotary kiln incinerator equipped with a single-
  stage ionizing wet scrubber for air pollution control for OSW,
  and an Incinerability evaluation of arsenic and pesticide con-
  taminated soils from the  Baird and McGuire Superfund site
  for Region 1 and OERR. Several facility and equipment con-
  structjpn and upgrade efforts were also completed.
  Specifications:  See also report for FY89, PB90-186339.
  Sponsored by Environmental  Protection Agency, Cincinnati,
  OH. Risk Reduction Engineering  Lab. 67p.
  Subject Index keywords: Incineration, Waste disposal, Haz-
  ardous materials, Air pollution control equipment, Environ-
  mental research.

1484 Operations and Research  at the U.S. EPA
  Incineration Research Facility: Annual Report for FY91
  Order Number PB92:239540CDH, price: PC A06/MF A02
  Acurqjc Corp., Mountain View, CA. Environmental Systems
  Div.; Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk
  Reduction Engineering Lab; Mar 92
  The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's Incineration Re-
  search Facility (IRF) in Jefferson, Arkansas, is an experimen-
  tal facility that houses two pilot-scale incinerators and the as-
  sociated waste handling, emission  control,  process control,
  and safety equipment; as well as onsite laboratory facilities.
  During  fiscal year 1991, five major test programs were com-
  pleted  at the facility: tests to establish residue characteristics
  from the incineration of spent potliners from aluminum pro-
  duction (K088) for the Office of Solid Waste (OSW); an eval-
  uation  of the incinerability of five contaminated soils from the
  Drake  Chemical  Superfund site  for Region 3; an evaluation
  of the  Incinerability of  PCB-contaminated  marine sediments
  from the New Bedford Harbor Superfund site for Region 1; a
  parametric evaluation of the fate of trace metals in a rotary
  kiln incinerator equipped with a Calvert high-efficiency scrub-
  ber system; and an evaluation of incinerability of arsenic-con-
  taminated soil from the Chemical Insecticide Corporation Su-
  perfund site for Region 2.
  Specifications:  See also PB91-182493. Sponsored by Envi-
  ronmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk Reduction
  Engineering  Lab. 117p.
  Subject Index keywords: Hazardous materials, Incinerators,
  Waste  disposal, Air pollution control.
1485 Operations and Research at the U.S. EPA
  Incineration Research Facility: Annual Report for FY92
  Order Number PB94:114659CDH, price: PC A06/MF A02
  Acurex Environmental Corp., Jefferson, AR.; Environmental
  Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk Reduction
  Engineering  Lab; Jun 93
  The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's Incineration Re-
  search Facility (IRF) in Jefferson, Arkansas, is an experimen-
  tal facility that houses two pilot-scale incinerators and the as-
  sociated waste handling, emission  control,  process control,
  and safety equipment;  as well as onsite laboratory facilities.
  During fiscal year  1992,  three  major test  programs  were
  completed at the facility: an evaluation of the incinerability of
  two contaminated sludges from  the Bofors-Nobel Superfund
  site for Region 5, an evaluation of the incinerability of PCB-
  contaminated soil from the Scientific  Chemical Processing
  Superfund site for Region 2, and an evaluation of the  effects
  of repeated incinerator waste feed cutoffs on incinerator par-
  ticulate,  HCI, trace metal, and organic constituent emissions
  for the Office of Solid Waste and the EPA incinerator permit
  writers.
  Specifications:  See also PB92-239540. Sponsored by Envi-
  ronmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk Reduction
  Engineering Lab.  120p.
  Subject index keywords: Incineration, Hazardous materials,
  Research projects.

1486  Potential Surrogate Metals for Incinerator Trial
  Burns
  Order Number PB94-162716CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
  Acurex Environmental Corp., Jefferson, AR.; Environmental
  Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk Reduction
  Engineering Lab;  1994
  Over the past four years, the research program at the Envi-
  ronmental Protection Agency's (EPA's) Incinerator Research
  Facility (IRF) has developed an  extensive body of  metals
  partitioning data from pilot-scale incineration tests using syn-
  thetic hazardous wastes, actual listed hazardous wastes, and
  contaminated materials  from  Superfund sites.  Because
  metals volatility  dominates  partitioning, surrogates can be
  used and  the choice of surrogates is simplified. The paper
  discusses the results of three extensive parametric test pro-
  grams performed at  the IRF  using  synthetic  hazardous
  wastes containing both hazardous constituent and potential
  surrogate  metals. These results  show  that surrogates parti-
  tion in the same manner as selected hazardous constituent
  metals. Thus, the use of surrogates deserves consideration,
  if not  in  actual trial burns, then at least in scoping tests used
  to guide the formal trial burn.
  Specifications:    Pub.  in Proceedings  of  the  1993 Inciner-
  ation  Conference, Knoxville, TN., May  3-7, 1993, p434-440.
  See also  PB90-263864,  PB90-263872,  PB91 -223388 and
  PB91 -223396. Sponsored   by   Environmental  Protection
  Agency, Cincinnati,  OH.  Risk Reduction  Engineering  Lab.
  Subject index keywords: Incinerators, Scrubbers, Hazard-
  ous materials, Air pollution control equipment, Meetings, Trial
  burn, Metal partitioning.

1487  Thermal Desorption Treatment (February 1994)
  Order Number PB94-160603CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
  Science Applications International Corp., Cincinnati, OH.;
  Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk
  Reduction Engineering Lab; Feb 94
  The bulletin discusses various aspects of the thermal de-
  sorption technology including applicability, limitations of its
  use,  residuals produced,  performance data,  site require-
  ments, status of the technology, and sources of further infor-
  mation.  The document is an  update of the original bulletin
  published in May 1991 (PB92-228080).
  Specifications:  See  also PB91 -228080,  PB93-1 26597  and
  PB93-1 33387.  Sponsored   by  Environmental  Protection
  Agency, Cincinnati, OH.  Risk Reduction  Engineering  Lab.
  Subject  index  keywords: Superfund,  Waste  treatment,
  Thermal desorption.
288

-------
                                                             TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Soil
                                                                                          Cleanup Technologies
TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM

IMPLEMENTATION: Soil Cleanup

Technologies

1488  Analysis of Treatability Data for Soil and Debris:
  Evaluation of Land Ban Impact on Use of Superfund
  Treatment Technologies
  Order Number PB90-258476CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Emergency and Remedial Response; 30 Nov 89
  The  directive summarizes the effectiveness of treatment
  technologies for contaminated soil and debris and provides
  support for decisions by the Regions to  use  treatability var-
  iances for complying with the RCRA Land Ban Disposal Re-
  strictions.
  Specifications:  25p.
  Subject index keywords: Regulations, Superfund, Remedial
  action, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency  Response, Soil
  contamination, Land Disposal Restrictions.
1489  Aseptic Sampling of Unconsolidated Heaving Soils
  in Saturated Zones
  Order Number PB91-216218CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
  Robert S. Kerr Environmental Research Lab., Ada, OK; 1991
  Collecting  undisturbed subsurface soil  samples in noncohe-
  sive,  heaving sandy environments  below the water table has
  been  extremely difficult using conventional soil  sampling
  equipment. Several modifications of the conventional hollow-
  stem auger coring procedures were adapted, which allowed
  collection of depth-discreet soil samples in very fluid, heaving
  sands. These methods  were used where  accurate subsur-
  face  characterization  of the contamination  of  RCRA and
  CERCLA sites was essential. Cohesionless cores were con-
  sistently retrieved, aseptically extruded from the core  barrel
  inside an anaerobic environmental chamber,  and preserved
  in the field. The physical, chemical, and biological integrity of
  discreet soil intervals was maintained for laboratory analysis.
  Statistical  analysis of repeated collection of soil samples
  from the same depth intervals in nearby boreholes was docu-
  mented.
  Specifications:  17p.
  Subject  index keywords:  Subsurface  investigations, Soil
  analysis, Land pollution, Waste disposal,  Soil contamination.
1490  BioGenesis (Trade Name) Soil Washing Technology:
  Innovative Technology Evaluation Report
  Order Number PB94-120045CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
  PRC Environmental Management, Inc., Rolling Meadows, IL;
  Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk
  Reduction Engineering Lab; 2 Sep 93
  Soil washing technologies  are designed to  transfer contami-
  nants from soil to a liquid phase. The BioGenesis Soil Wash-
  ing Technology uses soil washing with a proprietary surfac-
  tant solution  to transfer organic contaminants from soils to
  wastewater. The BioGenesis  soil washing process was evalu-
  ated under the SITE  program at a refinery  where soils were
  contaminated with crude oil. Results of chemical  analyses
  show that levels of total recoverable petroleum hydrocarbons
  (TRPH), an indicator of degraded crude oil, decreased  by 65
  to 73  percent in washed soils. The TRPH in residual soils
  were  allowed to  biodegrade  for an additional 120 days. Re-
  sults  indicate that soil washing and biodegradation removed
  85 to 88 percent of TRPH in treated soils. The Innovative
  Technology Evaluation Report provides information  on the
  technology applicability, economic analysis, technology limi-
  tations, a technology description, process residuals, site re-
  quirements, latest performance data, the technology status,
  vendors claims, and the source of further information.
  Specifications:    Sponsored by  Environmental  Protection
  Agency, Cincinnati,  OH. Risk Reduction Engineering  Lab.
  72p.
  Subject index keywords: Land pollution control, Superfund,
  Soil washing.

1491  Biological Assessment of Toxicity Caused by
  Chemical Constituents Eluted from Site Soils Collected
  at the Drake Chemical Superfund Site, Lock Haven,
  Clinton Co., Pennsylvania
  Order Number PB91-186965CDH, price: PC A20
  Corvallis Environmental Research Lab., OR; Feb 91
  The site  was used  to manufacture specialty intermediate
  chemicals for the producers of dyes, Pharmaceuticals,  cos-
  metics, herbicides,  and  pesticides.  The  herbicide  Fenac
  (2,3,6-trichlorophenylacetic acid) is a major on-  and  off-site
  contaminant. One-hundred-twenty-eight soils were collected.
  Elutriates were prepared for toxicity  evaluation of water ex-
  tractable constituents. The chemical nature of the elutriates
  was so complex that it was impossible to determine chemical
  cause/biological effect  relationships based on chemical anal-
  yses alone. Bioassays  identified locations of  toxicity  on the
  site without identifying  the causative agents;  important be-
  cause numerical  criteria are not available for  many organic
  chemicals and there is little understanding of  the affects of
  mixtures of chemicals in complex wastes on test organisms
  or the environment.  The measured response represents an
  actual assessment of any synergistic or antagonistic interac-
  tions.  Fifty-nine percent of the 128  elutriates  were toxic to
  the  algae Selenastrum capricornutum and  43  percent were
  toxic to Daphnia magna. Both organisms indicated that toxic
  sample numbers increased with depth of sampling. The Toxi-
  chromotest (bacteria) revealed toxicity  in 2.3%  of the 128
  elutriates; all  had been identified by algae and Daphnia. Ten
  elutriates were toxic only to Daphnia  and 30 only to S. capri-
  cornutum. Fifty-one were toxic to  both algae  and Daphnia,
  but  Daphnia was most sensitive in only 8 elutriates. If one
  test was used, 10 to 30 toxic elutriates would  have not been
  identified, depending  on the test organism selected.
  Specifications:  Portions of this document are not fully legi-
  ble. 456p.
  Subject index keywords: Biological effects, Chemical com-
  pounds, Superfund, Land pollution,  Waste disposal.

1492  BioTrol Soil Washing System for Treatment of a
  Wood Preserving Site: Applications Analysis Report
  Order Number PB92-115245CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
  Science Applications International Corp., Paramus, NJ.;
  Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk
  Reduction Engineering Lab; Mar 92
  The report analyzes the results of the SITE Program demon-
  stration of BioTrol's Soil Washing System at the MacGillis &
  Gibbs wood treatment facility in New Brighton,  MN. The con-
  taminants of  primary interest are pentachlorophenol (penta)
  and polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs). From tests
  with two soils (130 mg/kg and 680 mg/kg penta), it is  con-
  cluded that the soil  washer effectively segregates contami-
                                                                                                              289

-------
TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Soil
Cleanup Technologies
  nated soil into a large fraction of relatively uncontaminated
  washed soil, a small fraction  of  fine  clay and silt retaining
  about 30% of the original penta contamination, contaminated
  woody debris and contaminated process water. Biotreatment
  of the process water from the two soil washing tests degrad-
  ed 91-94% of the penta; removal of PAHs could not be de-
  termined. While steady state was not achieved, the biological
  treatment of the contaminated fines in a Slurry Bio-Reactor
  suggested that >90% removal of penta and PAHs could be
  achieved with a fully acclimated system. Combined operating
  and capital costs for an integrated, full-scale system are esti-
  mated to be $168/ton of soil treated; incineration  of the
  woody debris is a major cost factor.
  Specifications:  See also PB92-115302 and PB92-150655.
  Sponsored by Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati,
  OH. Risk Reduction Engineering Lab. 67p.
  Subject  index keywords: Wood preservatives, Soil treat-
  ment, Waste management, Biological treatment, Soil wash-
  ing, BioTrol soil washers.

1493  Characterization of Contaminated Soil from the
  Montclair/Glen Ridge, New Jersey, Superfund Sites
  Order Number PB90:168Q63CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
  Office of Radiation Programs, Washington, DC; Sep 89
  The Report describes the soil characterization phase conduct-
  ed  at the EPA  Eastern Environmental Radiation  Facility
  (EERF) In Montgomery,  Alabama. The identification of the
  spatial distribution of the radium within the soil and its asso-
  ciation with specific  minerals or materials is shown to relate
  to the later implementation phase. Procedures developed in
  the  investigation have application to other radioactively con-
  taminated Superfund sites.
  Specifications:  61 p.
  Subject index keywords: Radioactive isotopes, Soil proper-
  ties, Pollution.
1494  Characterization Protocol for Radioactive
  Contaminated Soils
  Ordei Nurriber PB92-963354CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Emergency and Remedial Response; May 92
  The fact sheet presents the soil characterization process ap-
  plicable in the RI/FS stages of  the  Superfund  process  to
  support the development  of technologies for  on-site volume
  reduction of radioactive soils by physical separation technol-
  ogies.
  Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
  posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
  and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also  available in
  paper copy or microfiche. 8p.
  Subject  index  keywords: Hazardous materials,  Pollution
  control, Radioactive waste disposal, Superfund.

1495  Characterizing soils for hazardous waste site
  assessments
  Order Number DE91014097CDH,  price: PC A03/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Solid Waste  and Emergency Response.; Department of
  Energy, Washington, DC; 1991
  The purpose of this paper is to provide guidance to Remedial
  Project Managers  (RPM) and On-Scene Coordinators (OSC)
  concerning soil characterization data types required for deci-
  sion-making  in the CERCLA RI/FS process  related to risk
  assessment  and remedial alternative evaluation for contami-
  nated soils. The information presented in  this paper is  a
  compilation of current information from  the  literature and
  from experience combined  to meet the purpose  of this
  paper. This paper addresses  two  concerns related to soil
  characterization  for CERCLA  remedial response. The first
  concern  is the  applicability  of traditional soil  classification
  methods to CERCLA soil characterization. The second is the
  identification of soil characterization data types required for
  CERCLA risk  assessment and analysis of remedial alterna-
  tives. These concerns are related, in that the Data Quality
  Objective (DQO) process addresses both. The DQO process
  was developed, in part, to assist CERCLA decision-makers  in
  identifying  the data types, data quality, and data quantity re-
  quired to support decisions that must be made during the Rl/
  FS process. This process as it relates to CERCLA soil char-
  acterization is discussed in the Data Quality Objective sec-
  tion of this paper. 99 refs., 2 figs., 4 tabs.
  Specifications:  Sponsored by Department of Energy, Wash-
  ington, DC. 26p.
  Subject  index keywords: Remedial  Action, Hazardous Ma-
  terials, Remedial Project Managers,  On-scene Coordinates,
  Soil characterization, Waste management.

1496  Control of Aromatic Waste Air  Streams by Soil
  Bioreactors
  Order Number PB92-144021CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
  Robert S. Kerr Environmental Research Lab., Ada, OK.;
  Oklahoma  Univ., Norman. Environmental and Ground Water
  Inst; C1991
  Contamination of groundwater resources is a  serious envi-
  ronmental  problem which is  continuing  to increase in occur-
  rence in the United States. It has been reported that leaking
  underground gasoline storage tanks may pose the most seri-
  ous threat  of all sources  of groundwater contamination. Gas-
  olines are  comprised of  a variety  of aliphatic and  aromatic
  hydrocarbons. The aromatic portion consists primarily of ben-
  zene, toluene,  ethylbenzene,  and  xylenes  (BTEX com-
  pounds). BTEX  compounds  are also among  the  most  fre-
  quency identified substances at Superfund sites.  Pump and
  treat well systems are the most common and frequently used
  technique  for aquifer restoration.  Treatment is often in the
  form of air stripping to remove the volatile components from
  the contaminated water. Additionally,  soil ventilation process-
  es have been used to remove volatile components from the
  vadose zone.  Both air stripping and soil ventilation produce a
  waste gas stream  containing  volatile compounds  which  is
  normally treated by carbon  adsorption or incineration.  Both
  treatment processes require a substantial capital investment
  and continual operation and maintenance expenditures. The
  objective of the study was to examine the potential of using
  soil bioreactors to treat a waste gas  stream produced by air
  stripping or soil ventilation  process.  Previous  studies have
  shown that various hydrocarbons can be successfully treated
  with  soils.  The study examined the removal of BTEX com-
  pounds within soil columns  and the influence of soil type,
  inlet concentration, and  inlet flow  rate on the removal effi-
  ciency.
  Specifications:   Pub. in Environmental Progress,  v10  n4
  p300-306  Nov 91.  Prepared in cooperation with Oklahoma
  Univ., Norman. Environmental and Ground Water Inst. 9p.
  Subject index  keywords:  Soil  treatment, Land  pollution
  control,  Water  pollution  control,   Biodegradation,  Aromatic
  compounds.
290

-------
                                                              TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Soil
                                                                                           Cleanup Technologies
1497  Determining Soil Response Action Levels Based on
  Potential Contaminant Migration to Ground Water: A
  Compendium of Examples
  Order Number PB90-183575CDH, price: PC A07/MF A01
  Booz-Allen and Hamilton, Inc., Washington, DC.;
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Emergency and Remedial Response; Oct 89
  The  document  presents case  studies illustrating  various
  methods that have been used at Superfund sites to calculate
  soil cleanup levels based on the  potential for hazardous con-
  stituents to migrate to and contaminate ground water. In ad-
  dition, several methods for which case studies could not be
  identified have been included in a separate section. The pur-
  pose of the  document  is not to recommend specific meth-
  ods; none of the  methods  or example analyses have been
  verified over the  long-term. The  compendium should  be
  viewed as  a  resource which illustrates the importance of as-
  sessing the impact of soil contaminants on ground water and
  the effects various parameters have on contaminant migra-
  tion through the unsaturated zone.
  Specifications:   Also  available  from Supt. of Docs.  Spon-
  sored  by Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC.
  Office of Emergency and Remedial Response. 145p.
  Subject index  keywords: Ground water, Environmental
  transport, Soils, Hazardous materials, Superfund, Cleanup.

1498  Development of Electro-Acoustic Soil
  Decontamination  (ESD) Process for In situ Applications
  Order  Number PB90-204728CDH, price: PC A07/MF A01
  Battelle Columbus  Labs., OH.; Environmental Protection
  Agency, Cincinnati, OH.  Risk Reduction Engineering Lab; Apr
  90
  The technical feasibility  of electro-acoustic soil decontamina-
  tion process  through lab experiments demonstrated the re-
  moval/concentration of  heavy metals such as cadmium and
  zinc. Results  of the decane contaminated soils were, howev-
  er, inconclusive.  The ESD process is based on the applica-
  tion of a d.c. electric field and acoustic field in the presence
  of a conventional hydraulic gradient to contaminated soils to
  enhance the  transport  of liquid  and metal  ions through the
  soils.  Electrodes (one or more anodes and a cathode) and
  an acoustic  source  were placed in contaminated  soils to
  apply an electric field and an acoustic field  to the soil. This
  process works  especially well  with  clay-type  soils  having
  small  pores  or capillaries,  where hydraulic permeability is
  very low.  The  development program included  a  literature
  review, soil characterization, design  and construction of the
  laboratory  ESD unit, and lab scale experiments with  soils
  contaminated with  decane, zinc  and  cadmium. Evaluation of
  the experimental results indicated that application of the field
  sources reduced the heavy metals zinc and cadmium more
  than 90% in the treated cake. Tests  yielded  10-20% decane
  removal.
  Specifications:    Sponsored by  Environmental Protection
  Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk  Reduction Engineering  Lab.
  141 p.
  Subject index keywords: Soils,  Pollution control, Remedial
  action, Heavy metals, Electroacoustic waves.
 1499  Developments in Chemical Treatment of
  Contaminated Soil
  Order Number PB92-152933CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk
  Reduction Engineering Lab; 1992
  The U.S.  Environmental Protection Agency's Office of Re-
  search and Development (ORD) is examining processes for
  remedial action  at Superfund sites, and corrective action at
  operating  disposal sites. Recent legislation emphasizes  de-
  struction and  detoxification of contaminants, rather than con-
  tainment or storage of contaminated soils. Chemical treat-
  ment appears promising because it can destroy or greatly
  change many contaminants. Oxidation, reduction, neutraliza-
  tion, hydrolysis, dehalogenation,  and  UV/photolysis   are
  chemical processes currently used for aboveground treat-
  ment. Temperature and physical and chemical characteristics
  of soil are some operating parameters that control the effec-
  tiveness of these processes. Excalibur catalytic ozone tech-
  nology, Exxon and Rio Linda cyanide destruction, and Trinity
  ultrasonic  detoxification  are  innovative  technologies  that
  have been, or are currently being considered for pilot-scale
  demonstrations.
  Specifications:   Presented  at Panamerican  Chemical Con-
  gress (2nd), San Juan, Puerto Rica, September 24-29, 1991.
  See also PB90-155607. 22p.
  Subject index keywords: Soil treatment,  Waste treatment,
  Remedial action, Superfund, Chemical treatment.

1500  Distribution of DRAFT Soil Screening Level
  Guidance
  Order Number PB93-963508CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 30 Sep 93
  The memorandum transmits a second review draft of the Soil
  Screening Levels Guidance to be used as a 'working draft' in
  discussions with the  Regions, States, and other stakeholders
  as we  refine  and finalize the guidance by the summer of
  1994. Only minor changes have been made  to the August
  19,1993 draft for clarification with the exception of Table 1;
  this table has  been changed to reflect newly obtained chemi-
  cal-specific information. The more significant technical  and
  policy issues  raised  during the August comment period will
  be addressed in FY  '94 through  a series of technical analy-
  ses, Regional  pilot studies, and outreach efforts.
  Specifications:  Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
  posit account  required (minimum  deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
  and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
  paper copy or microfiche. 17p.
  Subject index  keywords:  Superfund, Soil  contamination,
  Hazardous materials.

1501  EPA Engineering Issue: Technology Alternatives for
  the Remediation of  PCB-Contaminated Soil and
  Sediment
  Order Number PB94-144250CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
  Science Applications International Corp., McLean, VA.;
  Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk
  Reduction  Engineering Lab; Oct 93
  The document is intended to familiarize On-scene Coordina-
  tors (OSCs) and Remedial Project Managers (RPMs) with
  issues important to the successful selection of technology al-
  ternatives available for the remediation of soil and sediment
  contaminated with PCBs at Superfund sites. The primary pur-
                                                                                                              291

-------
TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Soil
Cleanup Technologies
  pose of the report is to provide OSCs and RPMs with infor-
  mation on established, demonstrated, and emerging technol-
  ogy alternatives for remediating PCB-contaminated soil and
  sediment. The secondary purpose is to provide basic infor-
  mation  on characteristics of PCBs, regulations governing
  PCB remediation,  sampling and data collection  methods ap-
  plicable to PCB contamination, analytical methods and tech-
  nologies used to  quantify  PCB contamination,  treatability
  studies, and sources of further information.
  Specifications:  See also PB86-232774 and PB91-921206.
  Sponsored by Environmental  Protection Agency, Cincinnati,
  OH. Risk Reduction Engineering Lab. 27p.
  Subject index keywords: Polychlorinated biphenyls, Soil
  contamination, Remediation.

1502  EPA SITE Demonstration of the BioTrol Soil
  Washing Process
  Order Number PB92-150655CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk
  Reduction Engineering Lab.; Science Applications
  International Corp., Paramus, NJ; c1992
  A pilot-scale soil washing process, patented by BioTrol, was
  demonstrated on soil that was contaminated by wood treat-
  ing waste. The BioTrol Soil  Washing was demonstrated in a
  treatment train sequence with two other pilot-scale units of
  BioTrol technologies for treatment of waste streams from the
  soil washer. The  three technologies of  the treatment train
  were: The BioTrol 'Soil Washer  (BSW), the BioTrol Aqueous
  Trealrnent System (BATS), and the  Slurry Bioreactor (SBR).
  The BioTrol processes were evaluated on pentachlorophenol
  (PGP) and polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), which
  were  the primary soil contaminants at the site. The sandy
  site soil, consisting of less than 10% of fines, was well suited
  for treatment by soil washing. The BSW successfully separat-
  ed the feed soil (100% by weight) into 83% of washed soil,
  10%  of woody residues,  and 7% of fines. The soil washer
  achieved  up to 89% removal of PCP and PAHs,  based on
  the difference between their levels in the feed soil and in the
  washed soil. The BATS degraded up to  94% of PCP in the
  process water from soil  washing. The SBR achieved over
  90%  removals of PCP and 70-90% removals  of  PAHs,  re-
  spectively from the soil washing. Cost of a commercial-scale
  soil washing, assuming use of all three technologies, was es-
  timated to be S168 per ton of treated soil.
  Specifications:  Pub. in Jnl. of Air and Waste  Management
  Association, v42 n1  p96-103 1991. See  also PB91-182279
  and PB91-228056. Prepared in cooperation with Science Ap-
  plications International Corp., Paramus, NJ. 29p.
  Subject index keywords:  Biological  industrial  waste treat-
  men!,  Soils,  Land  pollution, Wood preservatives,  BioTrol
  aqueous treatment system, BioTrol  soil washers, Slurry bio-
  reactors, Superfund.
 1503  Evaluation and Testing of a Protocol to Determine
  the Aerobic Degradation Potential of Hazardous Waste
  Constituents in Soil
  Order Number PB91-233296CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
  Environmental Protection  Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk
  Reduction Engineering Lab. Agricultural Research Service,
  BeltsyiHe, MD. Beltsyille Agricultural Research Center; 1990
  The U.S.  Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) in conjunc-
  tion with the U.S. Department of Agriculture is currently test-
  Ing a protocol for determining the 'Aerobic Degradation Po-
  tential of Hazardous Organic Constituents in Soil' to ensure
  its reliability, accuracy, cost effectiveness, and ease of use.
  This protocol is part of EPA's Office of Research and Devel-
  opment efforts to provide  Federal and State EPA offices as
  well as consultants and industries with guidelines  and en-
  couragement for conducting standardized treatability studies.
  Testing of the protocol  has been initiated with standardized
  soil (obtained from EPA's  Synthetic Soil Matrix, Edison, NJ).
  Two surrogate pollutants,  toluene, a volatile,  and phenol, a
  sernivolatile, are being tested  as representative, easily biode-
  gradable compounds.  Critical  aspects of the protocol involv-
  ing the configuration of the test  reactor and procedures  for
  trapping the volatiles  have been  identified. Once fine tuning
  of the process is completed, testing of combinations of com-
  pounds in a variety of  soil matrices is  planned.
  Specifications:  Presented at the Air  and  Waste  Manage-
  ment Association Annual Meeting and Exhibition (83rd) held
  in Pittsburgh, PA. on June 24-29, 1990.  Prepared in  coopera-
  tion with Agricultural Research Service,  Beltsville,  MD. Belts-
  ville Agricultural Research  Center. 9p.
  Subject  index  keywords:   Hazardous materials,   Aerobic
  processes,  Biological  treatment,  Land pollution   control,
  Waste management, Biodeterioration.

1504  Evaluation of Alternative Treatment Technologies
  for CERCLA Soils and Debris (Summary of Phase 1 and
  Phase 2)
  Order Number PB91-240572CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
  PEI Associates, Inc., Cincinnati, OH.; International
  Technology Corp., Knoxville, TN.**Bruck, Hartman and
  Esposito, Inc., Cincinnati, OH.*Environmental Protection
  Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk Reduction  Engineering  Lab;
  Sep 91
  The study was conducted  in two  phases. In the first phase, a
  synthetic  soil matrix was prepared as a theoretical composite
  of  Superfund soils  nationwide. In the  second phase, soils
  from  actual Superfund  sites  were treated.  Three treatment
  technologies were  evaluated  in  both phases: (1)  chemical
  treatment (KPEG), (2) physical treatment (soils washing), and
  (3) low-temperature thermal  desorption. The  Phase I study
  also included the evaluation of incineration  and stabilization.
  Comparison of results obtained in the treatment of Superfund
  soils  and the synthetic soils reveals that the trend in con-
  taminant  removals was similar for both types of soils. The
  percentage removal,  however, was higher for synthetic soils
  than for actual Superfund soils. This  can be attributed to the
  fact that  the synthetic soils were spiked and tested without
  allowing much time for sorption of the contaminant onto the
  soils. In contrast, the actual  Superfund  soils had weathered
  for long  periods of time before treatment was  attempted;
  therefore, contaminant removal was  shown to be more diffi-
  cult on the actual soils.
  Specifications:  Prepared in cooperation with International
  Technology Corp.,  Knoxville, TN., and  Bruck, Hartman and
  Esposito, Inc., Cincinnati, OH. Sponsored by Environmental
  Protection Agency,  Cincinnati, OH. Risk Reduction  Engineer-
  ing Lab. 71 p.
  Subject  index keywords: Soil treatment, Waste treatment,
  Superfund, Remedial  action.
 292

-------
                                                               TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Soil
                                                                                            Cleanup Technologies
 1505  Evaluation of Soil Venting Application. Ground
   Water Issue
   Order Number PB92-235605CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
   Environmental Protection  Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
   Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Apr 92
   The Regional Superfund  Ground-Water Forum is a group of
   scientists,  representing EPA's Regional Superfund Offices,
   organized  to exchange  up-to-date information  related to
   ground-water remediation at Superfund sites. One of the
   major issues of concern  to  the Forum is the transport and
   fate of contaminants in soil  and ground water as related to
   subsurface remediation. The ability of soil venting to inexpen-
   sively remove large amounts of volatile organic  compounds
   (VOCs)  from contaminated soils is  well established. Howev-
   er, the time required using venting  to remediate  soils to low
   contaminant levels often  required by state and federal regu-
   lators has  not  been adequately investigated.  Discussion is
   presented to aid in evaluating the feasibility of venting appli-
   cation. Methods to optimize venting application are also dis-
   cussed.
   Specifications:  9p.
   Subject  index  keywords: Waste management,  Superfund,
   Hazardous  materials, Water pollution control, Ground water,
   Soil venting, Innovative treatment technologies.

 1506  Extraction and Recovery of Lead Species from Soil
   Order Number PB93-150142CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
   Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH.  Risk
   Reduction Engineering Lab; c1992
   The remediation of lead contaminated soil at Superfund and
   urban soil is  a  serious concern, given the grave effects of
   lead exposure and the pervasive nature of the threat. The
   lead species of interest  are elemental lead,  lead sulfate,
   basic carbonate of lead  and lead dioxide.  These  species
  were solubilized in a three step process, using pure chemi-
  cals and  the total lead was recovered as lead sulfate. Bench
  scale experiment were done using a soil that was dosed with
  varying amounts of the contaminants (Total lead  from 1,000
  to 10,000 ppm.). Better than 80%  of the contaminants was
  recovered as  lead sulfate, using the three step process. The
  treated soil passed the TCLP test with 3.0 ppm of  lead,
  showing that  it  could be  redeposited on site.  A pilot  plant
  scale-up is being explored.
  Specifications:    Pub. in  Environmental  Progress, v11  n4
  P256-260 Nov 92. See also PB87-142378. 8p.
  Subject  index keywords: Soil treatment, Lead(Metal), Re-
  medial action, Land pollution control, Lead  inorganic  com-
  pounds.

1507  Ground-Water Issue: Soil sampling and analysis for
  volatile organic compounds
  Order Number DE91016758CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
  Environmental Monitoring Systems Lab., Las Vegas, NV; Feb
  91
  The Regional  Superfund Ground Water Forum is  a group of
  ground-water scientists that  represents EPA's Regional Su-
  perfund Offices.  The forum was  organized to exchange up-
  to-date information related  to groundwater remediation at Su-
  perfund sites. Sampling of  soils for volatile  organic com-
  pounds (VOCs)  is an issue identified by the Ground Water
  Forum as a concern of Superfund decision makers. Con-
  cerns over data  quality have  raised  many questions related
  to sampling  soils for VOCs. This paper was prepared in  re-
  sponse to some  of these questions and concerns  expressed
   by Remedial Project Managers (RPMs) and On-Scene Coor-
   dinators (OSCs). 53 refs., 6 figs.,  12 tabs.
   Specifications: 34p.
   Subject index keywords: Organic Compounds, Soils, US
   EPA,  Land  pollution,  Water pollution  control,  Remedial
   action.

 1508  Guide: Methods for Evaluating the Attainment of
   Cleanup Standards for Soils and Solid Media
   Order Number PB91-921365CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
   Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
   Emergency and Remedial Response; Jul 91
   The fact sheet highlights  statistical  concepts and methods
   used in  the evaluation of the attainment of cleanup stand-
   ards. It provides an example of a basic procedure for deter-
   mining sample size  required  to  obtain a given confidence
   level focusing on a cleanup standard specified as  a mean
   concentration with a specified confidence. It does not pro-
   vide policy on specification of cleanup  levels but should be
   considered a technical reference  guide for using some of the
   more common methodologies.
   Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
   posit account required (minimum  deposit $150 U.S., Canada,
   and Mexico; all others $300).  Single  copies also available in
   paper copy or microfiche. 8p.
   Subject  index  keywords: Hazardous  materials, Waste  dis-
   posal, Superfund.

 1509  In situ Bioremediation of Contaminated Unsaturated
   Subsurface Soils
   Order Number PB93-234565CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
   Utah State  Univ., Logan.; Robert S. Kerr Environmental
   Research Lab., Ada, OK; May 93
   An emerging technology for the  remediation  of unsaturated
   subsurface  soils involves the  use of microorganisms to  de-
   grade contaminants which  are present in such soils. Under-
   standing  the processes which drive in situ bioremediation, as
   well as the effectiveness and efficiency of the  utilization of
   these systems, are issues which have been identified by  the
   Regional Superfund Engineering  Forum as concerns  of  Su-
   perfund decision makers. Although in  situ bioremediation has
   been used for a number of years  in the restoration of ground
  water contaminated by petroleum hydrocarbons, it has only
   been in recent years that in situ systems have been directed
  toward contaminants in  unsaturated subsurface soils.  Re-
  search has contributed greatly to understanding the biotic,
  chemical, and hydrologic parameters which contribute to or
  restrict the application of in-situ bioremediation and has been
  successful at a number of  locations in  demonstrating its ef-
  fectiveness  at field scale.
  Specifications:  Sponsored by Robert S. Kerr Environmental
  Research Lab., Ada, OK.  18p.
  Subject index  keywords: Superfund, Soil chemistry, Micro-
  organisms control(Water), Water  pollution  control, Bioreme-
  diation.

1510   In situ  Soil Flushing. Engineering Bulletin
  Order Number PB92-180025CDH,  price: PC A02/MF A01
  Environmental Protection  Agency,  Washington, DC. Office  of
  Emergency and Remedial Response; Oct 91
  In situ soil flushing is the extraction of contaminants from the
  soil with water or other suitable aqueous solutions. Soil flush-
  ing is accomplished by passing the extraction fluid through
                                                                                                               293

-------
TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Soil
Cleanup Technologies
  In-place soils using ah injection or infiltration process. Extrac-
  tion fluids must be recovered and, when possible, are recy-
  cled! the method is potentially applicable to all types of soil
  contgrnlnants. Soil flushing enables removal of contaminants
  from the soil and  Is most effective in permeable soils. An ef-
  fective collection  system is required to prevent migration of
  contaminants and potentially toxic extraction fluids to uncon-
  taminated areas of the  aquifer. Soil flushing, in conjunction
  with in situ bioremediatign, may be a cost-effective means of
  soil remediation at certain sites. Typically, soil  flushing  is
  used in conjunction with other treatments that destroy con-
  taminants or remove them from the  extraction fluid  and
  groundwater.
  Specifications:  See also PB87-146007, PB90-155607, and
  PB9Q-274Q93. 10p.
  Subject index keywords: In-situ processing, Soil treatment,
  Land pollution control, Waste management, Hazardous mate-
  rials, Soil flushing.
1511  In situ Soil Vapor Extraction Treatment
  Order Number PB91-228P72CPH, price: PC A03/MF A01
  Science Applications International Corp., Cincinnati, OH.; FW
  Energy Applications, inc.; Livingston, NJ.*Environmental
  Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of Emergency
  and Remedial Response; May 91
  Soil vapor extraction (SVE) is designed to physically remove
  volatile compounds, generally from the vadose or unsaturat-
  ed zone. It is an  in situ process employing vapor extraction
  wells alone or in combination with air injection wells. Vacuum
  blowers supply the motive force, inducing  air flow  through
  the soil matrix. The air strips the volatile compounds from the
  soil and carries them  to the  screened extraction well. Air
  emissions from the systems are typically  controlled  by ad-
  sorption of the volatiles onto activated carbon, thermal de-
  struction (incineration or catalytic oxidation), or condensation
  by refrigeration. SVE is a developed technology that has
  been used in commercial operations for several  years. The
  final determination of the lowest cost alternative will be more
  site-specific than  process equipment dominated. The bulletin
  provides information on the technology applicability, the limi-
  tations of  the  technology, the technology description,  the
  types of residuals produced, site requirements, the latest per-
  formance data,  the status of the  technology, and  sources for
  further information.
  Specifications:   Prepared in  cooperation  with  FW  Energy
  Applications, Inc., Livingston, NJ. Sponsored by Environmen-
  tal Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of  Emergency
  and Remedial Response. 12p.
  Subject index keywords: Soil treatment, Hazardous materi-
  als, Air flow, Extraction, In-situ processing,  Soil vapor, extrac-
  tion.
1512  In situ Steam Extraction Treatment
  Order Number PB91-228064CDH, price: PC A02/MF  A01
  Science Applications International Corp., Cincinnati, OH.;
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Emergency and Remedial Response; May 91
  In situ steam extraction removes volatile  and  semivolatile
  hazardous contaminants from soil  and groundwater  without
  excavation of the hazardous waste. Waste constituents are
  removed in situ by the technology and are not actually treat-
  ed. The use of steam enhances  the stripping of volatile con-
  taminants from soil and can be used to displace  contaminat-
  ed groundwater under some conditions. The resultant con-
  densed liquid contaminants can be recycled or treated prior
  to disposal. The steam extraction process is applicable to or-
  ganic wastes but has not been used for removing insoluble
  inorganics and metals. Steam is injected into the ground to
  raise the soil temperature and drive off volatile contaminants.
  Alternatively, steam can be injected to form a displacement
  front by steam  condensation to displace groundwater. The
  contaminated liquid and steam condensate  are then collect-
  ed for further treatment. Two  types of systems are discussed
  in  the  document:  the  mobile system  and  the  stationary
  system. The bulletin provides information on the technology
  applicability,  limitations,  a description  of  the  technology,
  types of residuals produced, site requirements, the latest per-
  formance data, the status of the technology, and sources for
  further information.
  Specifications:   Sponsored by Environmental  Protection
  Agency, Washington, DC. Office of Emergency and Remedial
  Response. 9p.
  Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, In-situ proc-
  essing, Water pollution control, Ground water, Soil treatment,
  Extraction.
1513  Innovative Technology: Glycolate Dehalogenatibn
  Order Number PB90-274226CDH, price: PC  A01/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Emergency and Remedial Response; Nov 89
  The fact  sheet provides technology description, site charac-
  teristics affecting  treatment feasibility,  technology consider-
  ations, and technology status for Glycolate  Dehalpgenation.
  The sheet describes the process as being  potentially effec-
  tive in detoxifying specific types of aromatic organic contami-
  nants, particularly dioxins and PCBs.
  Specifications: 5p.
  Subject index  keywords: Hazardous  materials, Superfund,
  Waste management,  Office  of Solid Waste and Emergency
  Response, Dehalogenation, Glycolic acid.

1514 Innovative Technology: In-situ Vitrification
  Order Number PB90-274192CDH, price: PC  A01/MF A01
  Environmental  Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Emergency and Remedial Response; Nov 89
  The fact  sheet provides technology description, site charac-
  teristics affecting  treatment  feasibility,  technology consider-
  ations, and technology status for In-Situ Vitrification (ISV).
  The sheet describes how ISV can be used  to treat soils and
  sludges contaminated with mixtures of various waste types
  (e.g. radioactive, inorganic and/or organic).
  Specifications: 5p.
  Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Vitrification,
  Superfund, Waste  management,  Office of  Solid Waste  and
  Emergency Response, In-situ processing.

1515 Innovative Technology: Soil Washing
  Order Number PB90-274184CDH, price: PC A01/MF Apt
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Emergency and Remedial Response; Nov 89
  The fact sheet provides technology description, site  charac-
  teristics affecting  treatment  feasibility, technology consider-
  ations, and technology status  for  soil  washing. The  fact
  sheet describes how soil washing can be potentially benefi-
  cial in the separation/segregation and volumetric reduction
  of hazardous materials in solids,  sludges, and sediments.
  Specifications: 5p.
 294

-------
                                                               TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Soil
                                                                                            Cleanup Technologies
  Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Decontami-
  nation,  Super-fund,  Waste management,  Office  of  Solid
  Waste and Emergency Response, Soil treatment.

 1516  Interim Guidance on Establishing Soil Lead Cleanup
  Levels at Superfund Sites. Supplement to Interim
  Guidance on Establishing Soil Lead Cleanup Levels at
  Superfund Sites
  Order Number PB91-921352CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Emergency and Remedial Response; 1990
  The purpose of the directive (9355.4-02) is to set forth an in-
  terim soil  cleanup level for total lead, at 500 to 1000 ppm,
  which the Office of Emergency and Remedial Response and
  the Office of Waste Programs Enforcement consider protec-
  tive for direct contact at residential settings. This range is to
  be used at both  Fund-lead and Enforcement-lead  CERCLA
  sites. Further guidance will be developed  after the Agency
  has developed a verified Cancer Potency Factor and/or a
  Reference  Dose for lead. The  purpose  of  the  directive
  (9355.4-02A) is to reiterate that OSWER Directive 9355.4-02
  is a guidance document and not a regulation. As is  the case
  with other guidance documents, the guidance should not be
  used as a regulation.
  Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
  posit account required (minimum deposit $150 U.S.,  Canada,
  and Mexico; all others $300). Single copies also available in
  paper copy or microfiche. 6p.
  Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management
  Hazardous  materials, Public health,  Office of Solid Waste
  and Emergency Response.

1517  International Evaluation of In-situ Biorestoration of
  Contaminated Soil  and Groundwater (September  1990)
  Order Number PB93-207553CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 90
  The philosophy of in-situ biorestoration is to stimulate the  in-
  digenous  soil  microorganisms  to  degrade  contaminants  ,by
  improving the environmental conditions  in  the soil  using a
  water recirculation system. The objective of the project is to
  show the possibilities for application of the technique in rela-
  tion with contaminants,  soil conditions and other site-specific
  circumstances by means of integration and evaluation of re-
  sults of in-situ biorestoration projects. The  project is limited
  to the Netherlands, West Germany and the  USA. Experience
  has especially been gained with in-situ biorestoration at hy-
  drocarbon-contaminated petrol stations and industrial  sites.
  The system generally  consists  of  a  water  recirculation
  system, aboveground water treatment and conditioning  of
  the infiltrating  water with  nutrients and  an oxygen  source.
  However, there is no one-and-only application method for  in-
  situ biorestoration. The  remediation, which can last from ap-
  proximately six months  to  several  years, can reach  residual
  concentrations below the  B-value of the Netherlands exami-
  nation framework.
  Specifications: Pub. in Proceedings of NATO/CCMS  Inter-
  national  Conference,  Demonstration  of  Remedial Action
  Technologies for Contaminated Land and Groundwater (3rd),
  Montreal,  Canada, November  6-9, 1989. See also PB91-
  143198. 30p.
 .Subject index keywords: Remedial action, Soil contamina-
 tion, Water pollution control, Ground water, Foreign technolo-
 gy.
 1518  Literature Review Summary of Metals Extraction
   Processes Used to Remove Lead from Soils
   Order Number PB94-140613CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
   IT Corp., Cincinnati, OH.; Environmental Protection Agency,
   Cincinnati, OH. Risk Reduction Engineering Lab; Jan 94
   Numerous Superfund sites throughout the United States are
   contaminated  with  toxic metals.  Battery reclamation, lead
   smelting,  and  lead-based paint manufacturing are examples
   of  processes  that could result in lead-contaminated soils.
   Metals, unlike many hazardous organic constituents, cannot
   be  degraded or readily detoxified. This report presents infor-
   mation on metals extraction technologies that are currently in
   various stages of development, soil characteristics that affect
   metals extraction, chelating agents used in the  soil  washing
   of lead-contaminated soils, and membranes used to separate
   metal  cations. The information presented  in this report was
   obtained from a  literature search conducted to investigate
   metals extraction processes for removing lead from soils.
   Specifications:   Sponsored by  Environmental  Protection
   Agency,  Cincinnati, OH. Risk Reduction  Engineering Lab.
   62p.
   Subject  index keywords:  Soil  treatment, Land pollution
   control, Lead(Metal), Extraction, Remedial action.

 1519   On-Site Engineering Report for the Low-
   Temperature Thermal Desorption Pilot-Scale Test on
   Contaminated Soil
   Order Number PB92-216936CDH, price: PC A07/MF A02
   IT Environmental Programs, Inc., Cincinnati, OH.; IT Corp.,
   Knoxville, TN.*Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati,
   OH. Risk Reduction Engineering Lab; Jul 92
   Performance of the thermal desorption process for removal
   of organic contaminants, mostly polynuclear aromatic hydro-
   carbons (PAHs), from  soils was evaluated. The Superfund
   Site soil tested was a fine sandy soil contaminated with creo-
   sote. An optimum operating temperature of 550 C and an op-
   timum  operating residence time of 10 min,  determined from
   bench  studies, were used in the  pilot-scale desorber. Con-
  taminants removed from  the soil were captured or destroyed
  in the associated air pollution control equipment. Test results
  showed that greater than 99% of  the PAHs were removed
  from the soil.  The  concentration  of total  PAHs averaged
  4629 mg/Kg in the pretreated soils and were below detec-
  tion in the posttreated soils.
  Specifications:   Prepared  in  cooperation  with  IT  Corp.,
  Knoxville,  TN.  Sponsored   by Environmental  Protection
  Agency, Cincinnati,  OH. Risk Reduction  Engineering Lab.
  134p.
  Subject index  keywords:  Soil treatment,  Land pollution
  control, Thermal degradation,  Desorption.

1520  On-Site Engineering Report of the Slurry-Phase
  Biological Reactor for Pilot-Scale Testing on
  Contaminated  Soil
  Order Number PB93-178259CDH, price: PC A09/MF A02
  IT Environmental Programs, Inc., Cincinnati, OH.;  ECOVA
  Corp., Redmond, WA.*Environmental Protection Agency,
  Cincinnati, OH.  Risk Reduction Engineering Lab; Apr 93
  A pilot-scale test of the slurry-phase bioremediation technol-
  ogy  was performed by  ECOVA Corporation (ECOVA)  at the
  U.S.  EPA  Test and Evaluation (T&E) facility from  May  8
  through July 10, 1991 (12 weeks). The slurry-phase bioreac-
  tors  were tested  on a  creosote-contaminated soil from the
                                                                                                              295

-------
TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Soil
Cleanup Technologies
  Burlington Northern Superfund Site in Brainerd, Minnesota.
  The results of the bench-scale study (performed by ECOVA
  prior to the pilot-scale study) were used to optimize a pilot-
  scale bioreactor system containing 64 liters of 30 percent
  slurry (soihwater, w/v). The pilot-scale phase utilized an ino-
  culum of indigenous polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbon (PAH)
  degraders (9.3 x  10 to the 7th  power per gram of soil), an
  inorganic nitrogen supplement in the form of NH(4-)N, and a
  media  broth  containing  potassium,  phosphate, magnesium,
  calcium, and  iron  to achieve an  overall reduction. During the
  study,  levels  of sol-bound and  liquid-phase PAHs, total pe-
  troleum  hydrocarbons  (TPHs),  nutrients,  pH,  dissolved
  oxyg'e'h,  temperature, toxicity, and microbial activity were
  monitored.
  Specifications:  Prepared in cooperation with ECOVA Corp.,
  Redmond,  WA.  Sponsored  by  Environmental  Protection
  Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk Reduction  Engineering Lab.
  185p.
  Subject index keywords: Creosote, Soils, Bioreactors, Slur-
  ries.

 1521  On-Site Methods for Assessing Chemical Impact on
  the poll Environment Using Earthworms: A Case Study
  ai the Baird  and  McGuire Superfund Site, Holbrook,
  Massachusetts
  Order Number PB92-108166CDH,  price: PC A03/MF A01
  Corvallis Environmental Research  Lab., OR.; Menzie-Cura
  and Associates, Inc., Chelmsford, MA. NSI Technology
  Services Corp., Corvallis, OR. Environmental Research Lab;
  C199J
  Five Lumbricus terrestns Linneaus were placed  into enclo-
  sures at a field site and evaluated after 7 d. The enclosures
  were distributed in transects throughout areas of high and
  low contamination and in a reference area. Observations of
  earthworm responses for mortality, morbidity (coiling,  stiffen-
  ing,  swelling, lesions)  and whole body burden  were com-
  pared  to chemical measurements  in corresponding soil sam-
  ples. Nine  chemicals  (DDT, DDE,  ODD alpha chlordane,
  gamma-chlordane,  chlordene,  gamma-chlordene,   endrin,
  nonachlor) were measured in the  whole body of earthworms
  and soil samples. Various levels of impact were described by
  scoring  earthworm  responses  from  sampling  locations
  throughout the field site. A ranking of the sample  locations
  from low to high impact by the earthworm response variables
  is directly correlated to the  ranking of these locations for
  concentrations of total chlordane and  total DDT  in  corre-
  spofiding soil samples.  Results  show acute toxicity to earth-
  worms placed on-site and suggest that whole body concen-
  trations could impact earthworm  predators.  In addition, the
  on-site method eliminates the need to transport soils to off-
  site laboratories, thus preventing subsequent disposal issues.
  (Copyright (c) 1991 SETAC.)
  Specifications:   Pub.  in  Environmental  Toxicology and
  Chemistry, v10 p817-826 1991. Prepared in cooperation with
  Menzie-Cura and Associates, Inc., Chelmsford,  MA., and NSI
  Technology Services Corp., Corvallis, OR. Environmental Re-
  search Lab. 12p.
  Subject index keywords: Land  pollution, Biological indica-
  tors, Pesticides,  Environmental impact assessments, Anne-
   lids, Chemical compounds.
1522  Pilot-Scale Incineration of Comtaminated Soils from
  the Drake Chemical Superfund Site
  Order Number PB93-163004CDH, price: PC A12/MF A03
  Acurex Corp., Jefferson, AR. Incineration Research Facility.;
  Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk
  Reduction Engineering Lab; Mar 93
  A series  of pilot-scale incineration tests  were performed at
  the U.S.  Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA's) Inciner-
  ation  Research  Facility to evaluate the potential of inciner-
  ation as an option to treat contaminated soils from the Drake
  Chemical Superfund site in  Lock Haven, Pennsylvania. The
  soils at the Drake site are  reported to be contaminated to
  varying degrees with various organic constituents and sever-
  al  hazardous constituent  trace metals. The purpose of the
  test program was to evaluate the incinerability of selected
  site soils in terms of the destruction of contaminant organic
  constituents and the fate of  contaminant trace metals.  All
  tests were conducted in the rotary kiln incineration system at
  the IRF.  Test results show that greater than 99.995 percent
  principal  organic hazardous constituent (POHC) destruction
  and removal  efficiencies (DRE) can be achieved at kiln exit
  gas temperatures of nominally 816 C  (1,500 F) and 538 C
  (1,000 F). Complete soil decontamination of semivolatile  or-
  ganics was achieved; however, kiln ash levels of three  vola-
  tile organic constituents remained comparable to soil levels.
  Specifications:  See also PB91-186965. Sponsored by  Envi-
  ronmental Protection Agency,  Cincinnati, OH.  Risk Reduction
  Engineering Lab. 272p.
  Subject  index keywords: Superfund, Incinerators,  Land pol-
  lution control, Soil  treatment, Hazardous materials, Waste
  disposal.
 1523  Pilot-Scale Incineration  of Contaminated Soil from
  the Chemical Insecticide Corporation Superfund Site
  Order Number PB93-155968CDH, price: PC A09/MF A02
  Acurex Corp., Jefferson, AR.; Environmental Protection
  Agency,  Cincinnati, OH. Risk Reduction Engineering Lab;
  Feb 93
  An incineration test program was conducted at the U.S.  Envi-
  ronmental Protection Agency's Incinerator Research Facility
  to evaluate the potential of  incineration as an option to treat
  contaminated soils at the Chemical Insecticide Corporation
  Site. The test data show  that: The organochlorine pesticides
  were destroyed  to non-detectable quantities  in the ash,  the
  state-of-the-art  scrubber  removed  arsenic  to the 99.95%
  level, lime addition did not  improve the arsenic removal effi-
  ciency,  toxicity  characteristic  leaching   procedure  (TCLP)
  values for ash  metals varied, lime addition reduced TCLP
  leachability of metals, particulate and HCI levels were within
  accepted limits.  Incineration data that can be used for  other
  purposes was also collected for the soil tested.
  Specifications:  See also PB92-193382. Sponsored by Envi-
  ronmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk  Reduction
  Engineering Lab. 192p.
  Subject index keywords: Superfund, Soil treatment, Inciner-
  ation, Air pollution control, Insecticides, Metals.
 296

-------
                                                              TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION; Soil
                                                                                            Cleanup Technologies
1524  Presentations EPA-State Soil Standards Conference.
  Held in Crystal City, Virginia on January 29, 1991
  Order Number PB92-963350CDH, price: PC A08/MF A02
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Emergency and Remedial Response; Jan 92
  The first U.S. EPA-sponsored national conference on estab-
  lishing  soil cleanup  criteria that  would be protective of
  ground-water quality was held on January 29, 1991. Included
  in the publication are questions and answers from panel dis-
  cussions, as well  as text from the presentations.
  Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
  posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
  and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies  also available in
  paper copy or microfiche. 162p.
  Subject index keywords: Soils, Water pollution standards,
  Ground  water,  Hazardous  materials,  Meetings,  Superfund,
  Cleanup.

1525  Prospects for In situ Chemical Treatment for
  Contaminated  Soil
  Order Number PB92-126929CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk
  Reduction Engineering Lab; Dec 91
  Treating large  volumes of contaminated  soil at Superfund
  sites is costly. These factors have led the U.S. EPA's Super-
  fund Program to consider in situ chemical treatment as an al-
  ternative technology for treatment of  contaminated soil. Oxi-
  dation, reduction, neutralization, hydrolysis,  dehalogenation,
  and UV/photolysis are chemical processes currently used for
  above-ground treatment. Temperature, physical and chemical
  characteristics  of soil, are some operating  parameters that
  control the effectiveness of these processes. Improvements
  in mixing treatment materials in soil, and methods for recov-
  ering unreacted  material reaction products,  are  needed to
  allow wider application of these treatments in situ. Excalibur
  catalytic ozone technology, Exxon and Rio Linda cyanide de-
  struction, and Trinity ultrasonic detoxification are innovative
  technologies that  are being considered.
  Specifications:   See  also  PB87-146007.  Presented  at
  HMCRI's Annual  National Conference and Exhibition (12th),
  Washington, DC.,  December 3-5, 1991. 9p.
  Subject index  keywords: Hazardous materials,  Soil proper-
  ties, Waste treatment, In situ treatment, Superfund.
1526  Rationale for the Assessment of Errors in the
  Sampling of Soils
  Order Number PB90-242306CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
  Environmental Monitoring Systems Lab., Las Vegas, NV.;
  Nevada Univ., Las Vegas. Environmental Research Center;
  Jul90
  The sampling of  soils in RCRA and  Superfund monitoring
  programs  requires associated quality assurance programs.
  One objective of  any quality assurance program is to assess
  and document the quality of the study data to ensure that it
  satisfies the needs of the users. The purpose of  the docu-
  ment is to describe the nature and function of certain quality
  assurance samples in the assessment and documentation of
  bias and precision in sampling studies of  inorganic pollutant
  concentrations  in soils. The  document has been developed
  to provide people who plan, implement, or oversee RCRA or
  Superfund soil  sampling  studies with information on quality
  assessment samples so that they will have a better basis for
  decisions concerning the employment of such  samples in
  their quality assurance programs.
  Specifications: Prepared in cooperation with Nevada Univ.,
  Las Vegas. Environmental Research Center. 66p.
  Subject index keywords: Soils,  Sampling,  Quality  assur-
  ance.

1527   Reductive Dehalogenation of Organic Contaminants
  in Soils and Ground Water. Ground Water Issue
  Order Number  PB91-191056CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
  Robert S. Kerr  Environmental Research Lab., Ada, OK; Jan
  91
  Introduction and large  scale production of synthetic haloge-
  nated organic chemicals over the last 50 years has resulted
  in a group of contaminants which tend to persist in the envi-
  ronment and resist both biotic and  abiotic degradation. The
  low solubility of these types of contaminants, along with their
  toxicity and tendency  to accumulate in food chains, make
  them  particularly relevant targets for remediation activities.
  Although the processes involved in dechlorination of many of
  these organic compounds are well understood in the fields of
  chemistry  and  microbiology,  technological  applications of
  these processes to environmental  remediation are relatively
  new-particularly at pilot or field scale. It is well established,
  however,  that there are several mechanisms which result in
  dehalogenation of some classes of organic contaminants,
  often  rendering them less offensive environmentally. These
  include; stimulation of metabolic sequences through introduc-
  tion of electron donor and acceptor combinations; addition of
  nutrients to meet the  needs of dehalogenating  microorga-
  nisms; possible use of  engineered micro-organisms; and use
  of enzyme systems  capable of catalyzing reductive dehalo-
  genation.
  Specifications: 15p.
  Subject index keywords: Land pollution control, Water pol-
  lution control, Remedial  action, Superfund,  Waste disposal,
  Dehalogenation.

1528  Regional Guide: Issuing Site-Specific Treatability
  Variances for Contaminated Soils and Debris from Land
  Disposal Restrictions  (LDRs)
  Order Number PB92-963284CDH, price: PC A01/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Jan 92
  The fact sheet highlights the delegation of land disposal re-
  strictions (LDR) site-specific treatability variances to regional
  offices by describing both the procedures and requirements
  for issuance.
  Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
  posit account required  (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
  and Mexico; all others  $400). Single copies  also available in
  paper copy or microfiche. 4p.
  Subject index keywords: Superfund,  Waste management,
  Hazardous materials, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
  Response.
1529  Remediation of Contaminated Soils by Solvent
  Flushing
  Order Number PB94-162740CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
  Florida Univ., Gainesville. Dept. of Soil and Water Science.;
  Robert S. Kerr  Environmental Research Lab., Ada,
  OK.*Electric Power Research Inst,  Palo Alto, CA; C1994
  Solvent flushing is a potential  technique for remediating a
  waste disposal/spill  site contaminated with  organic chemi-
  cals. This technique involves the injection of a solvent mix-
                                                                                                               297

-------
TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Soil
Cleanup Technologies
  ture  (e.g., water plus  alcohols)  that enhances  contaminant
  solubility, reduces the retardation factor, and increases the
  release rates of the contaminants. A simulation  model is de-
  veloped to predict contaminant elution curves during solvent
  flushing for the case of one-dimensional, steady flow through
  a contaminated medium. Column experiments are conducted
  with  a Eustis fine  sand  that is  initially  equilibrated with an
  aqueous  naphthalene solution, and then eluted with different
  methanol-water mixtures  to  remove the  naphthalene. The
  model simulations,  based on  parameter values  estimated
  from literature data agree well with the measured elution pro-
  files, Solvent flushing experiments, where the soil was initially
  equilibrated with a solution of naphthalene and anthracene,
  show that compounds with different retardation factors are
  separated at low cqsolvent contents, while coelution of the
  compounds  occurs at higher contents. (Copyright (c) ASCE
  1994.)
  Specifications:  Pub. in  Jnl. of Environmental  Engineering,
  V120hi  p42-57 Jah/Feb 94.  See also  PB92-180025 and
  PB92-180074. Sponsored by Robert S.  Kerr Environmental
  Research Lab., Ada, OK. and Electric Power Research Inst.,
  Palo Alto, CA,18p.
  Subject  index  keywords: Waste disposal, Volatile organic
  compounds, Ground water, Water  pollution control, Super-
  fund.
1530  Removal of Creosote from Soil by Thermal
  Desorptlon
  Order Number PB92:126838CDH, price:  PC A02/MF A01
  International Technology Corp., Knoxville, TN.; Environmental
  Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk Reduction
  Engineering  Lab; 1991
  Performance of the thermal desorption  process for removal
  of organic contaminants,  mostly polynuclear aromatic hydro-
  carbons  (PAHs), from  soils was evaluated. A  Superfund Site
  Soil  that was contaminated with creosote was tested. An op-
  erating temperature of 550  C and  an  operating residence
  time of 10 minutes at temperature,  determined from  bench
  studies, were used in the pilot  scale desorber. Test results
  showed  that greater than 99%  of the PAHs were removed
  from the test sop. The concentrations of total  PAHs in the
  soil  before and  after  treatment averaged 4629 mg/kg and
  below detection limits  respectively.
  Specifications:   See also  PB91-228080.  Proceedings of
  HMCRI's Annual National Conference and Exhibition (12th),
  Washington, DC., December 3-5, 1991, p362-368. Sponsored
  by Environmental  Protection  Agency, Cincinnati,  OH. Risk
  Reduction Engineering Lab. 9p.
  Subject  index keywords: Soil treatment, Hazardous materi-
  als. Creosote, Thermal environments, Desorption.

 1531  Removal of Radionuclides by Electrokinetic Soil
  Processing
  Order Number PB93-222875CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
  Environmental Prqt§ctipQ Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk
  Reduction Engineering Lab; c1993
  Electrokinetics promises to be an innovative treatment proc-
  ess  for in-situ treatment of soils and groundwater contami-
  nated with  heavy  metals and  radionuclides. Electrokinetics
  refers to the movement of ionic liquids and charged particles
  relative to one another under the action of an applied direct
  current electric field.  The paper summarizes the  results of
  laboratory tests for the  removal  of uranium,  thorium, and
  radium, conducted  from February 28, 1991  to  March 30,
  1991 and a review of progress to date.
  Specifications:  Pub. in Jnl. of the National Technical Asso-
  ciation, v66 n2 p43-46 Spring 1993. 6p.
  Subject index keywords: Radioactive materials, Electrokin-
  etics, Soil contamination.

1532  Soil Washing Treatment
  Order Number PB91-228056CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
  Science Applications International Corp., Cincinnati, OH.;
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 90
  Soil washing is  a water-based  process  for  mechanically
  scrubbing soils ex-situ to remove undesirable contaminants.
  The process removes contaminants from soils in one of two
  ways: by dissolving  or suspending them in the wash solution
  (which is later treated by conventional wastewater treatment
  methods) or  by concentrating them into a smaller volume of
  soil through simple  particle size separation techniques (simi-
  lar to  those used in sand and gravel  operations). Soil wash-
  ing systems  incorporating both removal techniques offer the
  greatest promise for application to soils contaminated with a
  wide variety  of heavy metal and organic contaminants. The
  concept of reducing soil contamination through  the  use of
  particle size  separation  is based on the finding that most or-
  ganic and inorganic contaminants tend to bind, either chemi-
  cally  or physically,  to  clay  and silt  soil  particles.  At the
  present time, soil washing is used extensively in Europe and
  has had limited  use in the United States. During 1986-1989,
  the technology was one of the selected source control reme-
  dies at eight  Superfund sites. The bulletin  provides informa-
  tion on the technology applicability, the types of residuals re-
  sulting from  the  use of the technology, the latest perform-
  ance  data, site  requirements, the status of the technology,
  and where to go for further information.
  Specifications:   Sponsored by Environmental  Protection
  Agency, Washington, DC. Office of Emergency and Remedial
  Response. 13p.
  Subject index keywords:  Soil  treatment,  Washing, Waste
  management, Soil washing]
1533  Summary of Treatment Technology Effectiveness
  for Contaminated  Soil
  Order Number PB92-963351CDH, price: PC  A23/MF A04
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Emergency and Remedial Response; Jun 90
  The document presents the results of a study conducted by
  the Office of Emergency and Remedial Response that col-
  lected soil treatment data and analyzed the effectiveness of
  treatment technologies  on  contaminant treatability groups.
  The document presents the recommendations developed for
  the treatment of contaminated soil.
  Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
  posit  account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
  and Mexico; all  others $400). Single copies also available in
  paper copy or microfiche. 532p.
  Subject index keywords: Hazardous  materials, Soils, Waste
  treatment, Superfund, Remedial response.
 298
                                                 Hilllli.	if j! ..illlii,i i, I,,

-------
                                                              TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION- Soil
                                                                                           Cfeanup Technologies
1534  Superfund Engineering Issue: Considerations for
  Evaluating the Impact of Metals Partitioning during the
  Incineration of Contaminated Soils from Superfund Sites
  Order Number PB93-121341CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
  Science Applications International Corp., Cincinnati, OH.;
  Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk
  Reduction Engineering Lab; Sep 92
  A significant amount of research  has been conducted on the
  incineration of contaminated materials. Although  historically
  the primary focus has been on the destruction of organics,
  increased  emphasis is being placed in the fate  of  metals.
  Unlike  the  organic portion,  the  metal fraction may  change
  form but is not destroyed. Metals  can remain with the ash
  when discharged from  the  primary combustion  chamber.
  They can also volatilize or oxidize to form fumes or fine par-
  ticulates and pass through the  incineration system. Metal
  vapors, fumes, or particles can be collected by the APCDs,
  exit out the stack, or be deposited along the walls of the
  combustion chamber and remain in the incineration system.
  Potential pathways for metals are illustrated. This distribution
  of  metals into the various incinerator system components is
  called 'partitioning.' A number of factors affect how  various
  metals will partition, or behave, during incineration.
  Specifications:   See also  PB89-233423,  PB90-132812 and
  PB90-186339. Sponsored  by  Environmental   Protection
  Agency, Cincinnati,  OH. Risk Reduction Engineering  Lab.
  17p.
  Subject index keywords: Superfund,  Incinerators,  Metals,
  Soil treatment, Waste management, Metal  partitioning.

1535  Superfund Engineering Issue: Treatment of Lead-
  Contaminated Soils
  Order Number PB91-921291CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
  Environmental Protection  Agency, Washington,  DC. Office of
  Emergency and Remedial Response; Apr 91
  The bulletin summarizes the contents of a seminar on treat-
  ment of lead-contaminated soils presented on Aug. 28, 1990,
  to Region V Superfund and RCRA personnel by members of
  EPA's  Engineering  and  Treatment  Technology  Support
  Center located in the Risk Reduction Engineering Laboratory
  (RREL) in  Cincinnati, Ohio. The bulletin is intended to  sum-
  marize the  information presented during the seminar and it
  should not be viewed as a  definitive treatise on lead treat-
  ment technologies.
  Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing  Order, de-
  posit account required (minimum  deposit $200  U.S., Canada,
  and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
  paper copy or microfiche. 11 p.
  Subject index keywords: Lead(Metal), Hazardous materials,
  Waste treatment, Meetings, Superfund.

1536  Superfund Soils Data Management System
  Order Number PB92-139476CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
  COM Federal Programs Corp., Fairfax, VA.; Environmental
  Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk Reduction
  Engineering Lab; 1992
  The paper describes  the Superfund Soil Data Management
  System (DMS), a PC-based data system being  developed by
  the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) in its effort
  to manage and evaluate treatment and performance data for
  contaminated  soil, sludge,  and debris. The system  will be
  used to support  two basic  EPA objectives: (1) technology
  transfer; and (2) support for the development of RCRA  land
  disposal restrictions (LDRs) for contaminated soil and debris.
  COM Federal Programs Corporation is supporting EPA in the
  development of this data base. EPA is compiling and evalu-
  ating soil, sludge, and debris treatment data from a variety of
  sources such as: EPA Superfund remedial and removal ac-
  tions, RCRA and UST corrective actions, SITE program dem-
  onstrations,  and other research  programs;  Department of
  Energy (DOE); Department of Defense (DOD); treatment ven-
  dors; private contractors;  and  research organizations. This
  influx of data has created the information management need
  addressed by  the  Superfund Soil DMS. Written in  dBASE
  III— (a popular PC-based data base language), the Super-
  fund Soil DMS stores: Quantitative and qualitative data on
  ex-situ soil, sludge, and debris treatment technologies, Qual-
  ity control  (QC) data (such as blank, spike  recoveries, surro-
  gate recoveries, etc.), Bibliographic and site information, and
  Abstracts and extensive comments regarding treatment per-
  formance,  successes and problems, design and operating in-
  formation,  and recommendations for additional research.
  Specifications: Presented at HMCRI Annual National Con-
  ference and  Exhibition (12th), Washington, DC., December 3-
  5,  1991.  Sponsored by Environmental  Protection  Agency,
  Cincinnati, OH. Risk Reduction Engineering  Lab. 7p.
  Subject index  keywords:  Superfund, Waste management,
  Data base  management, Information  systems, Superfund
  Soils Data Management System.

1537  Technical Background Document for Draft Soil
  Screening Level Guidance
  Order Number PB94-963503CDH, price: Standing Order, call
  for price
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Emergency and Remedial Response; Mar 94
  The document provides technical details of the derivation of
  the September 30,  1993, draft Soil Screening  Levels (SSLs)
  Guidance  for Superfund (PB93-963508). The document is
  presented  in two sections.  Section  I defines  SSL  and pro-
  vides background  information on  the development of SSLs
  and their application and implementation at Superfund sites,
  including sampling schemes for  measuring SSL attainment.  It
  also provides draft SSLs developed for  30 chemicals. Sec-
  tion II provides the technical basis  for the development of
  SSLs addressing direct ingestion  of soil, inhalation of vola-
  tiles and fugitive dust, and the soil-to-ground-water  exposure
  pathway, including  the assumptions and theories  used  the
  their development.
  Specifications: Paper copy available on  Standing Order, de-
  posit account required  ($100 U.S., Canada, and Mexico; all
  others $200). Single copies  also available  in  paper copy or
  microfiche. 324p.
  Subject index keywords: Superfund, Hazardous materials,
  Soil contamination.

1538  Technology Demonstration Summary: Bio Trol Soil
  Washing System for Treatment of a Wood Preserving
  Site
  Order Number PB92-224393CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk
  Reduction Engineering Lab; Mar 92
  The Superfund Innovative Technology Evaluation (SITE) Pro-
  gram was instituted in 1986 to promote the development and
  application of innovative technologies to the  remediation of
  Superfund  and other  sites  contaminated with hazardous
  wastes. The Project Summary  highlights the  results of an
                                                                                                              299

-------
TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Soil
Cleanup Technologies
  evaluation of a specific arrangement of the  three technol-
  ogies of the BSWS. The system consists of multiple stages
  of physical abrasion, attrition, flotation, and washing of exca-
  vated soil  In the BSW. The site selected for the evaluation is
  a wood preserving facility in New Brighton, MM, where creo-
  sote and pentachlqrophenol were used for several decades.
  Specifications: See also PB92-115245. 7p.
  Subject Index keywords: Superfund,  Hazardous materials,
  Remedial action, Soil treatment, Waste management, BioTrol
  soil washing system.

1539   Technology Evaluation Report: Biotrol Soil Washing
  System for Treatment of a Wood Preserving Site.
  Volume 1
  Order Number PB92-115310CDH, price: PC A13/MF A03
  Science Applications International Corp., McLean, VA.;
  Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk
  Reduction Engineering Lab; Dec 91
  The report presents and evaluates the extensive database
  from the SITE Program demonstration at the MacGillis and
  Gibbs;  wood  treatment facility in New Brighton, MN. Soil
  washing and segregation, biotreatment of contaminated proc-
  ess water, and biodegradation  of a slurry of the contaminat-
  ed fines from the soil washing were evaluated over several
  weeks of operation. The contaminants  of concern were pen-
  tachlorophenol  (penta) and polynuclear  aromatic hydrocar-
  bons (PAHs). The results indicate that the soil washer effec-
  tively segregates contaminated soil into coarse, relatively un-
  oontamlnated sand constituting the largest  output fraction
  and a  much smaller fraction of fine clay/silt particles retain-
  ing about 30%  of the original contamination. Penta removal
  efficiency  from  the feed  soil  is 87%-89% (vendor's  claim:
  90%). Contaminated  woody  material is also segregated.
  Operational  variations and  their  impact on output qualities
  and quantities are described. Biotreatment  of process water
  from the soil washing successfully degraded  91-94% of the
  penta. The results for the slurry biological  treatment of the
  contaminated fines indicated that >90% removal of penta
  and PAHs probably can be achieved with a fully acclimated
  system operating at steady state. Combined operating and
  capital equipment cost for an integrated system are estimat-
  ed  tQ.be $168/ton of soil treated. Incineration of the woody
  debris is  a ma|or cost factor.  Costs are also presented  by
  process since specific applications may require different con-
  figurations of the three units.
  Specifications: Also available in set of 3 reports, PC E99/
  MF  E99,  PB92-115302. See also Volume  2, Part  A,  PB92-
  115328.  Sponsored by  Environmental Protection Agency,
  Cincinnati, QH. Risk Reduction  Engineering  Lab. 276p.
  Subject index  keywords: Soil treatment,  Land pollution
  control, Waste management, Wood preservatives, Biological
  treatment, Superfund,  Soil washing,  BioTrol soil washing
  system.
 1540  Technology Evaluation Report: Biotrol Soil Washing
  System for treatment of a Wood Preserving Site.
  Volume 2, Part A
  Order Number PB92-115328CDH, price: PC A17/MF A04
  Science Applications International Corp., McLean, VA.;
  Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk
  Reduction Engineering Lab; Dec 91
  The SITE Program demonstration of one configuration of the
  BioTfol Soil Washing  System (BSWS)  was conducted to
  obtain reliable performance and cost data  that can be used
 to evaluate the potential applicability of the technology as a
 remediation alternative for sites contaminated with hazardous
 wastes. The BSWS treatment train used in the study consists
 of three technologies: a soil washer; an aqueous treatment
 system; and a slurry bio-reactor. The demonstration was car-
 ried out at the MacGillis and Gibbs Superfund site in New
 Brighton, MN. The report analyzes the results from the SITE
 demonstration. It includes discussion of the operation  of the
 three separate treatment technologies (SW, SBR, and BATS)
 evaluated in the test and provides flow diagrams, a summary
 of the sampling and analytical programs, an economic  analy-
 sis, and a quality assurance/quality control evaluation  of the
 data. The volume, consisting of several appendices, presents
 key analytical data and the quality control and quality  assur-
 ance studies that were carried out as part of the demonstra-
 tion evaluation. Additional  supporting data is  archieved in
 EPA's Edison, New Jersey laboratory.
 Specifications: Also available in  set of 3 reports  PC E99/
 MF E99, PB92-115302. See  also Volume 1,  PB92-115310
 and Volume 2, Part B, PB92-115336. Sponsored by Environ-
 mental  Protection  Agency, Cincinnati,  OH. Risk Reduction
 Engineering Lab. 387p.
 Subject index keywords: Soil  treatment, Land pollution
 control, Waste management, Wood preservatives, Biological
 treatment, Superfund,  Soil washing,  BioTrol   soil washing
 system.

1541  Technology Evaluation Report: Biotrol Soil Washing
 System for Treatment of a Wood Preserving Site.
 Volume 2, Part B
 Order Number PB92-115336CDH, price: PC A15/MF A03
 Science Applications International Corp., McLean, VA.;
  Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk
  Reduction Engineering Lab; Dec 91
 The SITE Program demonstration  of one configuration of the
  BioTrol  Soil  Washing  System  (BSWS) was  conducted to
  obtain reliable performance and cost data that can be used
 to  evaluate the potential applicability of the technology as a
  remediation alternative for sites contaminated with hazardous
 wastes. The  BSWS treatment train used in the  study consists
  of  three technologies: a soil washer; an  aqueous  treatment
  system; and  a slurry bio-reactor. The demonstration was car-
  ried out at the MacGillis and Gibbs Superfund site in New
  Brighton, MN. The report analyzes the results  from the SITE
  demonstration. It Includes discussion of the operation of the
  three separate treatment technologies (SW, SBR, and  BATS)
  evaluated in  the test and provides flow diagrams, a summary
  of  the sampling and analytical programs, an economic analy-
  sis, and a quality assurance/quality control evaluation of the
  data. Conclusions were reached concerning the technology's
  suitability for use in  remediations involving both similar and
  different materials at other sites.
  Specifications: Also  available in set of 3 reports PC E99/
  MF E99, PB92-115302. See  also Volume 2,  Part A,  PB92-
  115328.  Sponsored  by  Environmental Protection Agency,
  Cincinnati, OH. Risk Reduction Engineering Lab. 334p.
  Subject  index keywords: Soil  treatment,  Land pollution
  control, Waste management,  Wood preservatives,  Biological
  treatment, Superfund, Soil washing, BioTrol  soil washing
  system.
 300

-------
                                                               TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Soil
                                                                                            Cleanup Technologies
 1542  Technology Evaluation Report: Pilot-Scale
  Demonstration of a Slurry-Phase Biological Reactor for
  Creosote-Contaminated Soil. Volume 1
  Order Number PB93-205532CDH, price: PC A09/MF A02
  IT Corp., Cincinnati, OH.; Environmental Protection Agency,
  Cincinnati, OH. Risk Reduction Engineering Lab; Mar 93
  The report documents a pilot-scale test of a slurry-phase bio-
  logical reactor for treatment of creosote-contaminated soil.
  The technology  used was a reactor system in which  an
  aqueous slurry of soil was mixed with appropriate nutrients
  and seeded with micro-organisms to enhance the biodegra-
  dation process. In the 12-wk study, a creosote-contaminated
  soil from the Burlington Northern Superfund Site  in Brainerd,
  MN, was used to test the  slurry-phase reactors.  The results
  of a previously-performed  bench-scale study were  used  to
  optimize a pilot-scale reactor system. Each reactor contained
  64  I of 30% slurry (soil: water,  w/v). The pilot-scale phase
  utilized an inoculum of indigenous polynuclear aromatic hy-
  drocarbon (PAH)  degraders (9.3  x 10 to the 7th power CPU/
  g of soil), an inorganic nitrogen supplement  in the form  of
  NH4(-N), and  a  media  broth containing  potassium, phos-
  phate, magnesium, calcium, and iron. The reduction of total
  PAHs exceeded 87%. The report presents detailed informa-
  tion concerning the operation, sampling and analysis, and re-
  sults achieved with the pilot-scale slurry-phase bioremedia-
  tion system.
  Specifications: See also PB92-129683. Sponsored by Envi-
  ronmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk Reduction
  Engineering Lab.  181 p.
  Subject index keywords: Biological treatment, Creosote,
  Soils, Superfund,  Waste treatment.

1543  Technology Evaluation Report: Toronto Harbour
  Commissioners (THC) Soil Recycle Treatment Train
  Order Number PB93-216067CDH, price: PC A07/MF A02
  Science Applications International Corp., Buffalo, NY.;
  Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH.  Risk
  Reduction Engineering Lab; Jul 93
  The report summarizes the results and activities of the dem-
  onstration testing  of Toronto Harbor  Commissioners (THC)
  Soil Recycle Treatment Train. The Demonstration was con-
  ducted at a site within the Port Industrial District (PID) in To-
  ronto, Ontario, Canada under the Superfund  Innovative Tech-
  nology Evaluation (SITE) Program developed by the U.S. En-
  vironmental Protection Agency (EPA). The demonstration ex-
  amined a part of THC's on-going evaluation of the treatment
  train during the first nine months of 1992. EPA elected  to
  sample the  process during the  processing of Soil B, which
  based on field sampling, was expected  to  exhibit relatively
  high organic (oil and grease, PAH compounds) and inorganic
  (heavy metals) contaminants.
  Specifications:    Sponsored  by Environmental  Protection
  Agency,  Cincinnati, OH. Risk Reduction Engineering Lab.
  148p.
  Subject  index keywords:  Land pollution control, Chemical
  treatment, Biological treatment, Toronto(Canada).
1544  Toronto Harbour Commissioners (THC) Soil Recycle
  Treatment Train. Applications Analysis Report
  Order Number PB94-124674CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
  Science Applications International Corp., Cincinnati, OH.;
  Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk
  Reduction Engineering Lab; Apr 93
  This project consists of a demonstration of the Toronto Har-
  bour Commissioners (THC)  Soil Recycle  Treatment  Train.
  The treatment train consists of three  processes. The first
  process utilizes an attrition soil wash process to separate rel-
  atively  uncontaminated soil from a more heavily contaminat-
  ed  fine slurry. The  contaminated fine  slurry  is then further
  processed in a metals removal process or a bioslurry reactor
  process or both to remove organic  contaminants and  heavy
  metals  contamination. The Toronto Harbour Commissioners
  conducted a long-term evaluation of this treatment train at a
  55 tons per day pilot plant at 185 Cherry Street in the port of
  Toronto, located in Toronto, Ontario, Canada. The Superfund
  Innovative Technology Evaluation (SITE) Program conducted
  a demonstration project that examined  in detail the process-
  ing  of soil from one  of the sites being evaluated in the over-
  all project. The goals of this study were to evaluate the tech-
  nical effectiveness and economics  of  a treatment process
  sequence  and to assess the potential applicability of the
  process to other wastes and/or other Superfund and hazard-
  ous waste sites.
  Specifications: See also PB93-216067. Sponsored by Envi-
  ronmental  Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk Reduction
  Engineering Lab. 68p.
  Subject index keywords: Soil treatment, Waste treatment,
  Hazardous materials, Superfund,  Foreign technology, Innova-
  tive treatment technologies, Soil washing, Soil Recycle Treat-
  ment Train.

1545  Toxic Treatments 'In-situ' Steam/Hot-Air Stripping
  Technology. Applications Analysis Report
  Order Number PB91-181768CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
  Science Applications International Corp., San Diego, CA.;
  Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk
  Reduction Engineering Lab; Mar 91
  A SITE Demonstration of the Toxic Treatment (USA) Inc. in-
  situ steam/hot-air  stripping technology  (Detoxifier) was con-
  ducted  beginning in the fall of 1989  at the  GATX Annex Ter-
  minal site located  in San  Pedro, CA. The chemical storage
  and transfer facility was contaminated with various solvents
  due to  spillage and  a fire. Contamination extended into the
  salt water table (1.8 meters). Based  on the SITE Demonstra-
  tion and other data, it was  concluded that 85% of the volatile
  organic compounds  and  50% of the  semivolatile organic
  compounds were removed from  the soil.  Fugitive air emis-
  sions are very low, and lateral and downward migration of
  contaminants due  to the treatment  were minimal. Finally, it
  was concluded that  this in-situ process  is cost competitive.
  Specifications:    Sponsored by  Environmental  Protection
  Agency, Cincinnati,  OH.  Risk Reduction  Engineering Lab.
  49p.
  Subject index keywords: Superfund, Soil treatment,  Land
  pollution control,  Waste  management,  Stripping,  Remedial
  action, TTUSA process.
                                                                                                               301

-------
TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION:
Solidification Technologies
1546  Toxlcity Bioassay and Eluate Heavy Metals Analysis
  Results of the Bench Scale Stabilization Study of Soils
  from the United Chrome Superfund NPL (National
  Priority List) Site Corvallis, Oregon
  Order Number PB90-120049CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
  Corvallis Environmental Research Lab., OR; Oct 89
  In support of Environmental Protection Agency Region  10
  and their United Chrome studies, the staff at Environmental
  Research Laboratory-Corvallis performed toxicity bioassays
  and selected chemical analyses. Direct toxicity tests (i.e.
  using soil as the medium) and indirect toxicity tests (i.e. using
  eluates  obtained from the samples) were  performed. The
  report presents  test results for toxicity bioassays and chemi-
  cal analyses for heavy metals.
  Specifications: 21 p.
  Subject index keywords:  Metals, Toxicity,  Chemical analy-
  sis, Chromium,  Soil  contamination,   Superfund  program,
  BencJi-scale experiments.
1547 Treatment of Nonhazardous Petroleum-
  Contaminated Soils by Thermal Desorption Technologies
  Order Number PB94:135118CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
  Focus Environmental, Ina, Knoxville, TN.; Foster Wheeler
  Envifesponse, Inc., Edison,  NJ.*Environmental Protection
  Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk Reduction Engineering Lab;
  Nov 93
  Spills, leaks, and accidental discharges of  petroleum prod-
  ucts have contaminated soil  at thousands of sites in the
  United States. One remedial action technique for treating pe-
  troleum contaminated soil  is the use of thermal desorption
  technologies. The  paper describes  the types, mechanical
  and operating characteristics of thermal desorption technol-
  ogies that are commercially available to treat petroleum-con-
  taminated soils. It  also provides step-by-step procedures to
  rate the critical  success factors influencing the general appli-
  cability  of thermal desorption at a particular site. Key factors
  that determine  process  economics  are identified, and esti-
  mated cost  ranges for treating petroleum-contaminated soils
  are presented. Spreadsheets are provided that can be used
  for performing cost analyses for specific applications.
  Specifications:  Pub. in Jnl. of the Air and Waste Manage-
  ment Association, v43 p1512-1525 Nov 93. Prepared in co-
  operation with  Foster Wheeler Enviresponse,  Inc.,  Edison,
  NJ. Sponsored  by  Environmental Protection Agency, Cincin-
  nati, OH. Risk Reduction Engineering Lab. 14p.
  Subject index keywords:  Petroleum products, Chemical
  spills, Superfund.
 1548  Will Soil Working Work for the Sand Creek
  Superfund Site
  Order Number PB94-112828CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
  Foster Wheeler Energy Corp.,  Livingston, NJ.; Environmental
  Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk Reduction
  Engineering Lab; 1993
  The 1987 Sand Creek Operable Unit 5 Record of Decision
  (ROD) Identified soil washing  as the selected remedy to re-
  mediate soils contaminated with high levels of organochlor-
  Ine pesticides,  2,  4-D herbicides and  metals.  Twenty-three
  experimental runs were conducted over a two week period in
  late September 1992, using a pilot scale device called  the
  Volume Reduction Unit (VRU). The experimental design eval-
  uated the effect of two wash temperatures, two pH levels,
  three surfactant types and  four surfactant concentrations,
  and two liquid to soil ratios on the contaminant removal effi-
  ciency of the soil washing process. Site soils from three
  depth classifications were used in the study.
  Specifications:   Presented  at  the  Hazardous Waste  Re-
  search Conference, Manhattan, Kansas, May  25-26, 1993.
  Sponsored by Environmental  Protection Agency, Cincinnati,
  OH. Risk Reduction Engineering  Lab. 13p.
  Subject index keywords: Pesticides, Land pollution control,
  Superfund, Soil washing.

1549  X-ray Fluorescence Survey of Lead Contaminated
  Residential Soils in Leadville, Colorado: A Case Study
  Order Number PB93-203156CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
  Lockheed Environmental Systems and Technologies Co., Las
  Vegas, NV.; Nevada Univ., Las Vegas. Harry Reid Center for
  Environmental Studies.*Environmental Monitoring Systems
  Lab., Las Vegas, NV; Mar 93
  The California Gulch Superfund Site in Leadville, Colorado
  was added to the National Priority List (NPL) in 1983. It is an
  historic mining and smelting site that is currently the focus of
  extensive studies on soil  lead contamination and bioavailabi-
  lity. Studies of ground and surface water impacts are also in
  progress.  Personnel  from  the Environmental Protection
  Agencies (EPA) Environmental Monitoring Systems Laborato-
  ry  at Las  Vegas (EMSL-LV), the Denver office of Roy F.
  Weston, Inc., and  Geostat Systems, Inc. (GSI) used field-
  portable X-ray fluorescence (FPXRF) to determine the spatial
  distribution  of lead concentrations in residential soils.  The
  report details the FPXRF program sample collection, prepa-
  ration, and analysis procedures, database management, and
  program quality assurance efforts at Leadville. The program
  clearly demonstrates that small, field portable XRF instru-
  mentation can produce large quantities of acceptable quality
  data in a timely and cost-efficient manner when used proper-
  ly.
  Specifications:  Prepared in cooperation with  Nevada Univ.,
  Las Vegas.  Harry  Reid  Center for Environmental  Studies.
  Sponsored  by Environmental Monitoring Systems Lab., Las
  Vegas, NV. 31 p.
  Subject index keywords: Lead(Metal), X-ray fluorescence
  analysis, Soil contamination.


TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM

IMPLEMENTATION: Solidification

Technologies

1550 Applications Analysis Report: Silicate Technology
  Corporation's Solidification/Stabilization Technology for
  Organic and Inorganic Contaminants in Soils
  Order Number PB93-172948CDH, price: PC A07/MF A02
  PRC Environmental Management, Inc., McLean, VA.;
  Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk
  Reduction Engineering Lab; Dec 92
  The STC demonstration was conducted under EPA's Super-
  fund Innovative Technology Evaluation (SITE)  Program in
  November,  1990,  at the  Selma  Pressure Treating  (SPT)
  wood preserving site in Selma,  California. The SPT site was
  contaminated with  both organics, predominantly pentachloro-
  phenol  (PCP),  inorganics, mainly arsenic,  chromium, and
  copper.  Extensive sampling and analyses were performed on
  the waste both before and after treatment to compare physi-
  cal, chemical, and leaching characteristics of raw and treated
 302
       lllltilhLlilii	'.JiPI'l	;,iiiii',v'!,!l.ii',i,

-------
                                                                    TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION:
                                                                                       Solidification Technologies
  wastes. STC's contaminated  soil  treatment  process was
  evaluated  based on contaminant mobility measured by nu-
  merous leaching tests, structural integrity of the solidified ma-
  terial, measured by physical and engineering tests and mor-
  phological examinations; and economic analysis,  using cost
  information supplied  by STC and  the  results of  the  SITE
  demonstration, the vendor's design and test data, and other
  laboratory and  field applications of the technology. It dis-
  cusses the advantages, disadvantages, and limitations,  as
  well as estimated costs of the technology.
  Specifications: See also PB93-131787. Sponsored by  Envi-
  ronmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk Reduction
  Engineering Lab. 150p.
  Subject index keywords: Soil treatment, Solidification, Sta-
  bilization,  Hazardous  materials, Waste  treatment, Silicate
  Technology Corporation.

1551  Chemfix Technologies, Inc. Solidification/
  Stabilization Process. Application Analysis Report
  Order Number PB91-187054CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
  PRC Environmental Management, Inc., Chicago, IL;
  Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati,  OH. Risk
  Reduction Engineering Lab; May 91
  The  Chemfix Solidification/Stabilization  treatment  process
  was evaluated under EPA's SITE program. The process re-
  duced  leaching levels of lead  and copper.  Physical testing
  results were acceptable. Appropriate applications and proc-
  ess limitations are discussed in the report.
  Specifications:   Sponsored  by Environmental  Protection
  Agency, Cincinnati,  OH.  Risk  Reduction Engineering  Lab.
  44p.
  Subject index keywords: Solidification, Stabilization, Super-
  fund, Waste treatment, Hazardous  materials, Chemfix proc-
  ess, Superfund Innovative Technology Evaluation Program.

1552  Description of EPA SITE Demonstration of the
  HAZCON Stabilization Process at the Douglassville,
  Pennsylvania Superfund Site
  Order Number PB90-216334CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati,  OH. Risk
  Reduction  Engineering Lab; c1989
  One technology field tested  under the SITE research pro-
  gram was  the  HAZCON stabilization process. This process
  treats the  waste by mixing it with Portland cement, water (if
  needed) and chloranan, a proprietary chemical. By compar-
  ing the chemical and physical properties of the waste before
  and after treatment, this field demonstration  developed  data
  on the strength and leaching potential  expected after treat-
  ment from  a range of waste characteristics. Six wastes at the
  Douglassville, PA Superfund Site, containing up to 25% or-
  ganics and 2% lead, were treated and evaluated. The physi-
  cal strength (200 to 1500 psi)  and durability, i.e., long-term
  stability, of the stabilized wastes were good.  Even in wastes
  with high levels of organics (25%),  stabilization of lead was
  very successful. Leaching results determined that lead  con-
  centrations dropped by factors between 100 and 1000  after
  treatment.  Stabilization of organics,  however,  achieved mixed
  results. Leachate  concentrations generally did  not change
  between treated and untreated  samples. It could not be de-
  termined if this was a failure of the treatment process or an
  anomaly of the test procedure. (Copyright  (c)  1989 AJr  &
  Waste Management Association.)
  Specifications:  Pub. in Jnl. of the Air and Waste Manage-
  ment Association, p282-286 Mar 89. 8p.
  Subject  index keywords: Waste treatment,  Stabilization,
  Solidification,  Hazardous  materials,  Superfund  Innovative
  Technology Evaluation, Encapsulation, Land pollution, Clean-
  up operations.

1553   EPA SITE Demonstration of the International Waste
  Technologies/Geo-Con In situ Stabilization/Solidification
  Process
  Order Number PB91-171686CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk
  Reduction Engineering Lab.; Foster Wheeler Enviresponse,
  Inc., Edison, NJ; cNov 90
  The paper presents an EPA evaluation of the first field dem-
  onstration of an in situ stabilization/solidification process for
  contaminated soil  under the EPA Superfund Innovative Tech-
  nology Evaluation (SITE)  program. Demonstration  of  the
  process  was  a joint effort of two vendors:  International
  Waste Technologies'  (IWT) of Wichita, Kansas, who provided
  the  treatment  process, specifically the proprietary  additive
  called HWT-20, and Geo-Con, Inc., of Pittsburgh, Pennsylva-
  nia, who  provided both engineering and hardware for the in
  situ  soil  treatment. The field demonstration  took place in
  April, 1988 at a site contaminated mainly with polychlorinated
  biphenyls (PCBs).  EPA tested the soil before and after treat-
  ment and the EPA evaluation of the process is based on re-
  sults from the testing. A year later, in April 1989, EPA tested
  again the treated  soil and  results  of that testing were com-
  pared to those of the demonstration. Results of the  EPA
  evaluation of the  IWT  process, the Geo-Con performance,
  and treatment  costs are discussed separately. (Copyright (c)
.  1990~Air & Waste Management Association.)
  Specifications: Pub. in Jnl. of Air and Waste Management
  Association,  v40 n11  p1569-1576 Nov 90. See also PB89-
  194161  and  PB89-194179. Prepared  in  cooperation  with
  Foster Wheeler Enviresponse, Inc., Edison, NJ. 10p.
  Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials,  Stabilization,
  Solidification, Remedial action, Soil treatment,  Land pollution,
  Superfund Innovative  Technology Evaluation Program.

1554   Evaluation of Waste Stabilized by the Soliditech
  SITE Technology
  Order Number  PB92-136878CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
  Environmental  Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk
  Reduction Engineering Lab; c1990
  The Soliditech technology  demonstration was conducted at
  the  Imperial  Oil Company/Champion Chemicals Superfund
  Site in Monmouth  County, New Jersey. Contamination at the
  site  includes PCBs, lead (with various other metals) and oil
  and grease. The process mixes the waste material with pro-
  prietary additives, pozzolanic materials, and water, in a batch
  mixer. Technical criteria used to evaluate its effectiveness in-
  clude (1) short-term  extraction  and engineering tests;  (2)
  long-term extraction and and leaching tests; (3)  petrographic
  examination;  and (4)  structural  integrity observations. Three
  different waste types-contaminated soil, waste filter cake ma-
  terial and oily sludge-and a sand blank were treated. Neither
  PCBs nor volatile  organic compounds were detected in the
  extracts of treated wastes.  Significantly reduced amounts of
  metals were detected in the extracts of treated wastes com-
  pared to untreated.
  Specifications: Pub. in Jnl. of Air and Waste Management
  Association, v40 n3 p310-316 1990. See also PB91-129817.
  9p.
                                                                                                                303

-------
TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION:
Solidification Technologies
  Subject Index keywords: Chemical  stabilization, Solidifica-
  tion,Waste   disposal.  Waste  treatment,  Superfund,
  Monrnouth(New Jersey).

1555   Immobilization Technology Seminar: Speaker Slide
  Copies and Supporting Information
  Order Number PB90-127473CDH, price: PC A09/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Center for
  Environmental Research Information; Oct 89
  Solidification/stabilization technology  is  being  utilized as a
  treatment technology for Resource Conservation and Recov-
  ery Act RCRA listed waste and waste from uncontrolled haz-
  ardqus yvaste sites.  Several Best Demonstrated  Available
  Technology (BDATQ levels for Resource Conservation and
  Recovery Act (RCRA) waste codes are  based on  solidifica-
  tion/stabilization  technology.  Vitrification   technology  is
  emerging as an alternative technology for hazardous waste.
  Approximately 25 percent of the Records of Decision (RODs)
  for  Fiscal Year 1988 for the Superfund Program involved so-
  lidification/stabilization.
  Specifications: Also available from Supt. of Docs.  183p.
  Subject Index keywords: Meetings,  Solidification, Stabiliza-
  tion, Waste  treatment,  Hazardous  materials,  Vitrification,
  Technology utilization.

1556   In-situ Stabilization/Solidification of PCB
  (Polychtorinated Biphenyls)-Contaminated Soil
  Order Number PB90-113291CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
  Foster Wheeler Enviresponse, Inc., Edison, NJ.;
  Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk
  Reduction Engineering Lab; 1989
  An  evaluation was performed of  the  International  Waste
  Technologies HWT-20 additive and the Geo-Con, Inc. deep-
  soii-mixing  equipment for an  in situ stabilization/solidification
  process and its applicability  as an  onsite treatment method
  for  waste site cleanup. A demonstration was held at a Gen-
  eral Electric Co.  electric  service shop in  Hialeah,  Florida
  which provided the bulk of the  information for the technology
  evaluation. Conclusions were reached concerning the tech-
  nology's  suitability for  use in  cleanups  of various  contami-
  nants and  at different locations: immobilization of polychlori-
  nated biphenyls (PCBs) appears likely, although due to  low
  leachate concentrations for  both the treated  and  untreated
  soils, a  result of the low soil concentrations encountered in
  most of the tests, it cannot be confirmed; heavy metals can
  probably be immobilized; volatile organics can be reduced to
  low concentrations in treated soil leachates, but the ability to
  Immobilize  is not clear; a small volume increase on the order
  of magnitude of 5%-10% can be expected; the solidified ma-
  terial shows satisfactory physical properties, with high uncon-
  fined compressive strengths, moderately low  permeabilities,
  and satisfactory Integrity for  the wet/dry samples, but unsat-
  isfactory integrity for the freeze/thaw samples; and micros-
  tructural results indicate a dense, low-porosity, homogeneous
  mass, indicating a potential for long-term durability.
  Specifications:  Presented  at International Conference for
  New Frontiers for Hazardous Waste Management (3rd), held
  in  Pittsburgh,  Pennsylvania on September   10-13,  1989.
  Sponsored by Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati,
  OH. Risk Reduction Engineering Lab.  13p.
  Subject  Index keywords:  Hazardous materials,  Solidifica-
  tion, Site surveys, Waste disposal, Stabilization,  Collecting
  methods,  Land pollution,  Polychlorinated  biphenyls,  Super-
  fund program,  Internationa Waste Technology, Cleanup op-
  erations, Remedial action.

1557   International Waste Technplogies/Geo-Con In situ
  Stabilization/Solidification: Applications Analysis Report
  Order Number  PB90-269085CDH, price: PC A05/MF A01
  Foster Wheeler Enviresponse, Inc., Edison, NJ.;
  Environmental  Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk
  Reduction Engineering Lab; Aug 90
  An  evaluation  was performed of  the  International  Waste
  Technologies (IWT) HWT-20  additive and the  Geo-Con, Inc.
  deep-soil-mixing equipment for an in situ stabilization/solidifi-
  cation process and its applicability as an on-site treatment
  method for waste site cleanup. A demonstration was held at
  a General Electric Co. electric service shop in  Hialeah,  Flori-
  da.  Conclusions  were reached concerning the technology's
  suitability for use in cleanups of various contaminants and at
  different locations. The conclusions drawn from the available
  data are that:  (1) immobilization of polychlorinated biphenyls
  (PCBs) appears likely, although due to low leachate concen-
  trations for both the treated and untreated soils as a result of
  the  low PCB concentrations  in soil encountered in most of
  the  tests, it cannot be confirmed;  (2) heavy metals can  prob-
  ably be immobilized;  (3) volatile organics can be reduced to
  low concentrations in treated soil  leachates,  but the ability to
  immobilize  is not clear; and (4) a small volume increase on
  the  order of magnitude of 5%-10% can be expected.
  Specifications:  See also PB90-269077. Sponsored by  Envi-
  ronmental Protection  Agency,  Cincinnati, OH. Risk Reduction
  Engineering Lab. 92p.
  Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste dis-
  posal, Earth fills, Waste treatment, Superfund, Polychlorinat-
  ed biphenyls.

1558   Results from  the Stabilization Technologies
  Evaluated by  the Site Program.  New England
  Environmental Expo 90
  Order Number  PB91-162479CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
  Environmental  Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk
  Reduction Engineering Lab; 1990
  The Superfund Innovative Technology Evaluation (SITE) Pro-
  gram was developed  to assist the development of hazardous
  waste treatment technologies necessary to implement new
  cleanup standards  which  require  greater reliance on perma-
  nent remedies. As part of the SITE program, four stabilization
  and solidification processes have been performed, six  treat-
  ability studies  are underway, and five demonstrations are  in
  the planning and site selection phase. During  these demon-
  strations, the  effectiveness of the stabilization/solidification
  processes  was evaluated by measuring  the  chemical and
  physical characteristics before and after treatment. An  over-
  all  conclusion, from  the completed SITE demonstration on
  Stabilization Processes, is that a Treatability study should be
  required before selecting a remediation technology. Also, it
  appears that each stabilization process has similar capabili-
  ties to treat metals and inorganics, and significantly different
  capabilities to  handle organics.
  Specifications:  Proceedings of  the New England Environ-
  mental Expo  90,  Hynes  Convention Center,   Boston,  MA.,
  April 10-12, 1990. 16p.
  Subject index keywords: Superfund, Hazardous materials,
  Waste treatment, Stabilization, Remedial action.
304

-------
 15ff u-f:'TE Demonstra«°n of the CHEMFIX Solidification/
   Stabilization Process at the Portable Equipment Salvage
   Company Site
   Order Number PB90-217621CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
   Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk
   Reduction Engineering Lab; C1990
   A  demonstration of the CHEMFIX  solidification/stabilization
   process was conducted under  the United  States Environ-
   mental  Protection  Agency's (EPA)  Superfund  Innovative
   Technology  Evaluation  (SITE) program. The demonstration
   was conducted  in  March 1989, at the Portable Equipment
   Salvage Company (PESC) uncontrolled hazardous waste site
   in  Ciackamas, Oregon.  Waste containing lead, copper,  and
   polychlonnated biphenyls (PCBs) from four different areas of
   the site were treated. Results showed substantial  reduction
   of  teachable lead and  copper between  the untreated waste
   and treated waste  utilizing the EPA Toxicity Characteristics
   Leaching Procedure (TCLP)  test. The effectiveness  of  this
   process for immobilizing PCBs could not be determined since
   the raw waste did not leach PCBs at high concentrations  uti-
   lizing the TCLP test. Data from other leaching tests for lead
   and copper would need to be utilized as input into a site spe-
   cific groundwater model to determine  whether solidification/
   stabilization would  be  an acceptable remedy for  the  site
   Physical testing results indicated  durability in exposed condi-
  tions. (Copyright (C) 1990-Air  and Waste Management Asso-
  ciation.)

  Specifications:  Pub. in Jnl. of the  Air and Waste  Manage-
  ment Association, p166-170 1990. 7p.
  Subject index keywords: Waste disposal, Hazardous mate-
  rials, Solidification, Stabilization, Waste treatment, Superfund
  Innovative Technology Evaluation, Encapsulation CHEMFIX
  process, Remedial action.

1560  Solidification/Stabilization: Is It Always Appropriate
  Order Number PB92-191188CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk
  Reduction Engineering Lab.; American Society for Testinq
  and Materials, Philadelphia, PA; c1992
  The increasing use  of solidification/stabilization  (S/S) tech-
  nologies in  the United States, especially for remediation of
  sites under the Superfund program, has raised several ques-
  tions about the overall  appropriateness  of S/S. For many
  types of  hazardous  waste,  notably  for heavy metals, S/S
  usually  gives  excellent results for long-term  immobilization
 as  measured  by  existing physical and chemical protocols
  However, results of several studies, as well as data  from re-
 mediation of several Superfund sites, have raised concerns
 about whether S/S is a valid technology for treating  organic-
 bearing  wastes. Furthermore, studies also provide evidence
 that tests other than the regulatory extraction tests (for ex-
 ample, toxicity characteristic leaching procedure (TCLP)) will
 be required  to evaluate the effectiveness of S/S, especially
 when applied to organic wastes. Suggestions are offered for
 improving treatability  studies used  for evaluating S/S applied
 to selected metals. Approaches are also provided for deter-
 mining the appropriateness of S/S applied to organic con-
 taminants. The paper will  focus  on  evaluating chemical
 leaching behavior as  a measure of S/S effectiveness A de-
 cision tree is presented for determining  the suitability of S/S
 treatment for wastes  containing organic contaminants, which
 can be more difficult than  metals to immobilize.
          TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION:
                             Solidification Technologies


   Specifications:   Pub.  in Stabilization  and Solidification  of
   Hazardous,  Radioactive,  and Mixed Wastes,  v2 STP1123
   P18-32. See also  PB91-182741 and PB90-116773. Prepared
   in cooperation with American Society for Testing and Materi-
   als, Philadelphia, PA. 18p.
   Subject index keywords:  Hazardous  materials, Solidifica-
   tion, Stabilization, Waste treatment,  Remedial action.

 1561  Solidification/Stabilization of Organics and
   Inorganics
   Order Number PB94-106333CDH, price:  PC A03/MF A01
   Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk
   Reduction Engineering Lab; Sep 92
   The engineering bulletin on solidification refers to techniques
   that encapsulate hazardous waste  into a  solid material of
   high structural integrity.  Encapsulation  involves either  fine
   waste particles (microencapsulation) or a large block or con-
   tainer of wastes (macroencapsulation). Stabilization refers to
   techniques that treat hazardous waste by converting it into a
   less soluble,  mobile, or toxic form. Solidification/Stabilization
   processes utilize one or both of these techniques. The bulle-
   tin provides information on the technology applicability,  the
   technology limitations, a description of  the technology,  the
   types of residuals produced, site requirements, the latest per-
  formance data, the status of the technology, and sources of
  further information.
  Specifications:  See also PB87-116745, PB90-179656 and
  PB93-172948. 15p.
  Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Stabilization,
  Solidification,  Waste treatment, Remedial action, Solid waste
  disposal.

1562  Soliditech, Inc. Solidification/Stabilization Process:
  Applications  Analysis Report
  Order Number PB91-129817CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk
  Reduction Engineering Lab; Sep 90
  The Soliditech process mixes  and chemically  treats waste
  material  with Urrichem (a proprietary reagent), additives, poz-
  zolanic  materials or cement, and  water, in  aten-cubic  yard
  batch concrete mixer  to form a more stable material.  This
  technology was demonstrated in December  1988 at the Im-
  perial Oil Company/Champion Chemical Company Superfund
  site  in Morganville, New Jersey.  Contaminated soil, waste
  filter cake material, and oily sludge, containing PCBs, various
  metals, and  petroleum  hydrocarbons were treated. The proc-
  ess was  evaluated based on contaminant mobility, measured
  by leaching and permeability tests; structural and integrity of
  the solidified  material, measured  by physical,  engineering,
  and morphological tests; and economic analysis, using cost
  information  supplied  by Soliditech,  Inc.  The  conclusions
 drawn were: (1) process can solidify waste materials contain-
 ing  high  oil  and grease concentrations; (2) heavy metals
 such as  arsenic, cadmium, lead, and zinc are  successfully
 immobilized;  (3) short-term physical  stability of the treated
 waste was high; (4) some long-term tests  of  the treated
 wastes indicate  a potential for physical  degradation, while
 others indicate stability; (5) treatment  results in a 22 percent
 average volume increase and an  average bulk density  in-
 crease of 33 percent; and (6) the process is economical.
 Specifications: 59p.
                                                                                                                305

-------
                            IMPLEMENTATION:
Solidification Technologies
  Subject index keywords: Chemical stabilization, Solidifica-
  tion, Superfund,  Remedial action, Technology assessment,
  Soltdjteeh process.
1563  Sorption, Important in Stabilized/Solidified Waste
  Forms
  Order Number PB94-155256CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
  Dames and Moore, Cincinnati, OH.; Cincinnati Univ., OH. •
  Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering.*Environmental
  Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk Reduction
  Engineering Lab; c1994
  Sorption  is one of the  important fixation mechanisms  of
  metals in stabilized/solidified waste forms. In the present
  work, the sorption-desorption processes  active  in cement-
  based waste forms in acetic acid solutions were investigated.
  Experimental  results indicated that the extent of sorption of a
  metal ion was strongly "jp'H dependent. Cement-based waste
  forms  had similar  sorption characteristics as  amphorous
  silica gel. The pH of the sorption edge is 5 to 6.5 for Pb(2-)
  and As(3-), 6 to 8.5 for Cd(2-), and 8 to 12 for Ca(2-). In
  addition, almost 90%  of the lead and cadmium were leach-
  able at pH 4.5, while nearly 30% of arsenic  remained un-
  leached  at the  same pH. (Copyright (c)  Hazardous Waste
  and Hazardous Materials 1992.)
  Specifications:   Pub. in Hazardous Waste and  Hazardous
  Materials, v9  n3 p289-296  1992. See also  PB90-127473.
  Prepared in cooperation with Cincinnati Univ., OH. Dept. of
  Civil and Environmental Engineering. Sponsored by Environ-
  meifal  Protection Agency,  Cincinnati,  OH. Risk Reduction
  Engineering Lab. lip.
  Subject index keywords: Sorption, Waste treatment, Solidi-
  fication,  Stabilization, Superfund, Remedial action, Stabilized/
  solidified waste.
 1564  Superfund Innovative  Technology Evaluation
  Technology Demonstration Summary: Chemfix
  Solidification/Stabilization Process, Clackamas, Oregon
   Order Number PB91-921373CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
   Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
   Emergency and Remedial Response; Dec 90
   The document  summarizes  the  demonstration of Chemfix's
   patented stabilization/solidification technology at the Porta-
   ble Equipment Salvage Company (PESC) site in Ciackamas,
   Oregon, as a part of the Superfund Innovative Technology
   Evaluation (SITE)  Program. The chemfix process is designed
   to solidify and stabilize  hazardous wastes in liquids, sludges,
   soils, and ashes using proprietary additives.
   Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
   posit account required (minimum deposit  $150 U.S., Canada,
   an4 Mexico; all others $300). Single copies also available in
   paper copy or microfiche. 6p.
   Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Stabilization,
   Waste treatment, Superfund, Clackamas(Oregon).
  1565  Technical Resource Document: Solidification/
   Stabilization and Its Application to Waste Materials
   Order Number PB93-237535CDH, price: PC A16/MF A03
   Battelle, Columbus, OH.; Environmental Protection Agency,
   Cincinnati, OH. Risk Reduction Engineering Lab; Jun  93
   Stabilization/solidification (S/S) processes are  effective in
   treating a variety of  difficult to  manage  waste  materials for
   reuse or disposal. S/S has been identified as the Best Dem-
   onstrated Available Technology for treating a wide range of
   Resource Conservation  and Recovery  Act  (RCRA)  non-
 wasfewater hazardous waste subcategories. S/S  has been
 selected as the treatment technology of choice for 26% of
 the remedial  actions complete at Superfund sites through
 fiscal year 1992.  The standard bulk  material handling and
 mixing equipment used  in many S/S processes  make the
 technology appear simple. The  morphology and chemistry of
 S/S-treated waste are complex. Selection  of the  binder re-
 quires an understanding of the chemistry of the bulk material,
 the contaminants, and the binder. Battelle, under the direc-
 tion  of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, has pre-
 pared the Technical Resources Document (TRD) as a re-
 source for the S/S user community and a  guide to promote
 the best future application of S/S processes.
 Specifications:   Sponsored  by  Environmental  Protection
 Agency, Cincinnati,  OH. Risk  Reduction  Engineering Lab.
 369p.
 Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste man-
 agement, Waste treatment.

1566  Technology Evaluation Report: Chemfix
 Technologies, Inc.  Solidification/Stabilization Process,
 Clackamas, Oregon. Volume 1
 Order Number PB91-127696CDH, price: PC A07/MF A01
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 90
 The CHEMFIX solidification/stabilization  process was evalu-
  ated in the  U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's SITE
  program. Waste from an uncontrolled hazardous  waste site
  was treated by the CHEMFIX process and subjected to a va-
  riety of physical and chemical test methods. Physical testing
  on the treated material  indicated durability in exposed envi-
  ronmental conditions. The treated waste exhibited adequate
  physical properties. The treated waste generally met the reg-
  ulatory  leaching  criteria established  for the demonstration.
  Volume I provides a comprehensive  description of the tech-
  nology and the procedures used in the SITE demonstration,
  a complete description of the analytical results from the SITE
  demonstration, and an evaluation of  the cost of the CHEM-
  FIX technology. Volume II contains the analytical data, QA/
  QC data, and other information related to this SITE  demon-
  stration.
  Specifications: See also Volume 2,  PB90-274127. 133p.
  Subject index  keywords: Waste treatment,  Solidification,
  Chemical stabilization, Superfund, Land pollution  abatement,
  CHEMFIX process.
 1567  Technology Evaluation Report: International Waste
  Technologies/Geo-Con In situ Stabilization/
  Solidification. Volume 3. Update Report
  Order Number PB90-269069CDH, price: PC A04/MF  A01
  Foster Wheeler Enviresponse, Inc., Edison, NJ.;
  Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk
  Reduction Engineering Lab; Sep 90
  The long-term performance tests provide  information on the
  first follow-up sampling and analysis on  the SITE  program
  demonstration of the International Waste Technologies addi-
  tive, and the Geo-Con deep soil mixing equipment. The sam-
  ples containing  PCBs,  were  collected one year after  the
  demonstration,  and the chemical and  physical  test results
  were compared to those obtained during  the demonstration.
  This was the first part of a 5-year monitoring program on this
   in-situ stabilization/solidification process. The demonstration
  was performed in  April 1988 at an  electric service  shop in
  306

-------
    Hfaleah, FL Volume 3 discusses the results of the long-term

    SonstmtioT ^ h°W they C°mpare to the results °f *he
                   .w   3|SO PB9°-269085  and Volume  2,
                 and Volume 4,  PB90-269077. Sponsored by
   Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk Re
   auction Engineering Lab. 54p.

       f °n !?u^ keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste dis-
       l, Earth fills,  Waste treatment, Superfund.
   TY^hnT"1-*""/'^ Evaluatlon Report: International Waste
   Technologies/Geo-Con In situ Stabilization/
   Solidification. Volume 4. Update Report
   Order Number PB90-269077CDH, price: PC A16/MF A02
   Foster Wheeler Enviresponse,  Inc., Edison, NJ •
   Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk
   Reduction Engineering Lab; Sep 90

   IS iong"term Performance tests provide information on the
   first follow-up sampling and analysis  on the  SITE program
   tto •nSfo0' !^e lnjternational Waste Technologies addi-
   tve, and the Geo-Con deep soil mixing equipment. The sam-
   ples  containing PCBs, were collected  one  year after  the
   demonstration, and the chemical and physical  test results
   Thi^^Tlh3^ !° th°S?  obtained dljring the demonstration.
   This was the first part of a 5-year monitoring program on this
   m-situ stabilization/solidification process. The> demonstration
   was Performed in April 1988 at an  electric service shop in
   Hialeah FL Volume 4 contains the technical operating data-
   logs, laboratory analyses,  and microstructural analyses.

   PRQn'SQn^81 e See  alSO  PB90-269085 and  Volume 3,
   payu-269069   Sponsored   by  Environmental   Protection
  Agency, Cincinnati,  OH.  Risk  Reduction Engineering  Lab.


         , '2d!K,kIfyT,?rds: Hazardous materials, Solid waste
         I, Earth fills, Waste treatment.

1569  Technology Evaluation Report SITE Program
  Demonstration Test, HAZCON Solidification,
  Douglassville,  Pennsylvania. Volume 1
  Order Number PB89-158810CDH, price: PC A07/MF A01
  Enviresponse Inc  Livingston, NJ.; Environmental  Protection
  Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Office of Research and
  Development; Feb 89

  The major objectives of the HAZCON Solidification SITE Pro-
  gram Demonstration  Test  were  to develop reliable perform-
  ance and cost information. The  HAZCON  process  mixes  he
  hazardous waste material with cement, a proprietary additive
  canea  uiioranan and water.  The Chloranan is claimed to
 t^ hvrirfti!!?6 irjhibitin9 etlect that organics normally have on
 the hydration of cement. The technical criteria used to evalu-

 nLnt mrfh^h6"6^  °f !he HAZCON  process were contami-
 nant mobility, based on leaching and  permeability tests; and
 potential integrity of solidified soils, based  on measurements
 of physical and microstructural  properties.  Extensive sam-
 pling and analyses were performed showing the concentra-
 nnJL t U8 °!\ganics were the same in the leachates of the
 2ES f H trf ^ S,°ilS'  heavy metals reductions were
 !2 T ',And !,tructural properties of  the  solidified cores
 were found to indicate good long-term  stability.
 Specifications:  See also PB89-158828. Sponsored by Envi-
 ^1?ltntaLPn0tef''°n A9encv'  Cincinnati, OH. Office of Re-
 search and Development. 131 p.
          TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION:
                              Solidification Technologies


    Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Cost analy-
    sis,  Encapsulating,  Oil  wastes,  Solidification,  Superfund
    project,  SITE program, HAZCON solidification process  Oil
    pollution.

  1570  Technology Evaluation Report: SITE Program
    Demonstration Test, Soliditech, Inc., Solidification/
    Stabilization Process. Volume 1
    Order Number PB90-191750CDH, price: PC A07/MF A01
    PRC Environmental Management, Inc., Chicago, IL;
    Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk
    Reduction Engineering Lab; Feb 90
   The primary objective of the Soliditech, Inc. solidification/sta-
   bilization demonstration was to develop reliable performance
   and cost information. The demonstration took place at the
   Imperial Oil  Company/Champion Chemical Company Super-
   fund site in  Morganville, New Jersey. Contamination at this
   site includes PCBs, various metals, and oil and grease The
   Soliditech process mixes the waste material with Urrichem  a
   proprietary reagent; proprietary additives; pozzolanic  materi-
   als or cement (cement was used for the demonstration); and
   water, in an open-topped concrete mixer. The technical crite-
   ria used to evaluate the effectiveness of the Soliditech proc-
   ess were contaminant mobility, based upon leaching and per-
   meability  tests;  and the structural  integrity of  the solidified
   material, based  upon physical and morphological tests  The
   treated wastes had significant structural integrity, low perme-
   ability, and higher bulk density than the untreated wastes pH
   values of the treated wastes were highly influenced by alka-
   linity of the Portland cement added  during treatment  Docu-
   mentation will consist of two reports. This one is the Tech-
   nology Evaluation  Report that describes the field activities
   and  laboratory results.
   Specifications:  See  also Volume 2, PB90-191768  Spon-
   sored by  Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH.
   Hisk Reduction Engineering Lab. 138p.
  Subject index keywords: Waste treatment, Hazardous ma-
  terials,  Solidification, Stabilization, Technology utilization  Su-
  perfund Innovative Technology Evaluation Program, Solidi-
  tech  process.

1571  Technology Evaluation Report: SITE Program
  Demonstration Test, Soliditech, Inc. Solidification/
  Stabilization Process. Volume 2
  Order Number PB90-191768CDH, price: PC$77.00
  PRC  Environmental Management, Inc., Chicago, IL;
  Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk
  Reduction Engineering Lab; Feb 90
  The primary objective of the Soliditech, Inc. solidification/sta-
  bilization demonstration was to develop reliable performance
  and cost information. The demonstration took place at the
  Imperial Oil Company/Champion Chemical Company Super-
  fund site in Morganville,  New Jersey.  Contamination at this
  site includes PCBs,  various metals, and oil and grease. The
  Soliditech process mixes the waste material with  Urrichem a
  proprietary  reagent;  proprietary additives;  pozzolanic materi-
 als or cement  (cement was used for the demonstration); and
 water, in an open-topped concrete mixer. The technical crite-
 ria used to  evaluate the effectiveness of the Soliditech proc-
 ess were contaminant mobility, based upon leaching and per-
 meability tests; and the  structural integrity of the solidified
 material, based upon physical and morphological tests  The
 treated wastes had significant structural integrity,  low perme-
                                                                                                               307

-------
TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION:
Surface Water & Sludge Treatment Technologies


  ability, and higher fc>ulk density than the untreated wastes. pH
  values  of the treated wastes were highly influenced by alka-
  linity of the portland cement added during treatment. Docu-
  mentation will consist of two reports. This one is the Applica-
  tion Analysis  Report that provides an interpretation  of  the
  data!"'and discusses the potential applicability of the technol-
  ogy.
  Specifications: See also Volume 1, PB90-191750. Portions
  of this  document are no! fully legible. Sponsored by Environ-
  mental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH.  Risk  Reduction
  Engineering Lab. 675p.
  Subject index keywords: Waste treatment, Hazardous ma-
  terials, Solidification, Stabilization, Technology utilization, Su-
  perfund Innovative Technology Evaluation Program, Solidi-
  tech process.


TECHNOLOGY  PROGRAM

IMPLEMENTATION: Surface Water &

Sludge Treatment Technologies

1572  Acid Volatile Sulfide Predicts the Acute Toxicity of
  Cadmium and Nickel in Sediments
  Order  Number P193-222107CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
  Manhattan Coll., Bronx, NY.; Science Applications
  International Corpl, Narragansett, RI.*Environmental
  Research Lab., Narragansett, Rl; c1991
  Laboratory toxicity tests using amphipods, oligochaetes, and
  snals  with spiked freshwater and marine sediments and with
  conj^mjnated  sediments collected from an EPA Superfund
  site demonstrate  that  no significant mortality occurs relative
  to controls if the molar concentration of acid volatile sulfide
   (AVS) In the sediment is greater than the molar concentra-
   tion of simultaneously extracted cadmium and/or nickel. Al-
   though it is well-known that these metals can form insoluble
   sulfides, It apparently has not been realized  that AVS is a re-
   active pool of solid-phase sulfide that  is available  to  bind
   metals and render that portion  unavailable and  nontoxic to
   biota.  Thus, the AVS concentration of a sediment establishes
   the Boundary below which these metals cease to exhibit an
   acute toxicity in freshwater and marine sediments. (Copyright
   (c) 1991 American Chemical Society.)
   Specifications:  Pub.  in Environmental Science and Tech-
   nology, v26 n1 p96-101 1992. Prepared in  cooperation with
   Science Applications  International Corp.,  Narragansett, Rl.
   Sponsored  by Environmental Research Lab.,  Narragansett,
   Rl. 8p.
   Subject index keywords: Toxicity, Cadmium,  Nickel, Water
   pollution effects(Animals), Acid volatile sulfides.
  1573 Application of a Water Quality Assessment
   Modeling System at a Superfund Site
   Orcler Number PB92-164490CDH, price: PC A05/MF A01
   ASci Corp., Athens, GAl; Environmental Research Lab.,
   Athens, GA. Office of Research and Development; Aug 91
   Water quality modeling and related exposure assessments at
   a Superfund site, Silver Bow Creek-Clark Fork River in  Mon-
   tana,  demonstrate the capability to predict the  fate  of mining
   waste pollutants in the environment.  A linked  assessment
   system  - consisting of hydrology and erosion, river hydrau-
   lics, surface water quality, metal speciation, non-point source
   and groundwater mixing and transport models - has  been
 applied at the site to show the applicability of such modeling
 schemes and the complexities involved in  the application.
 Some of the models had to be modified to match the re-
 quirements  of this project.  Graphs of the water quality pa-
 rameters show good fit between the measured and predicted
 concentrations at some stations whereas  substantial devi-
 ations are observed at other stations along the course of the
 stream.
 Specifications:  See also  PB88-144167 and PB88-185095.
 Sponsored  by Environmental  Research Lab., Athens, GA.
 Office of Research and Development. 94p.
 Subject  index  keywords:  Mine wastes, Hydrology, Water
 quality,  Water  pollution effects,  Superfund,  Mathematical
 models.
1574  Application of 'Real-Time' Monitoring in Decision
 Making: The New Bedford Harbor Pilot Dredging Project
 Order Number PB94-130747CDH, price: PC A01/MF A01
 Environmental Research Lab.,  Narragansett, Rl; 1994
 A decision-making framework  was  established for assessing
 the  impacts of a pilot  dredging study at the New Bedford
  Harbor, MA, Superfund site. Concern over possible environ-
  mental impacts due to dredging at the site necessitated that
 a monitoring program be implemented to ensure that unac-
  ceptable water  quality  impacts did  not occur during the
  project. A committee of environmental managers from Feder-
  al and state government was established with the  authority
  to assess and modify the operation on a daily basis. Finally,
  a 'real-time' monitoring  plan was implemented in which water
  samples were collected, analyzed within 16 hours, and the
  data supplied to the management  committee  in  order to
  assess the environmental impact of the previous days' oper-
  ation. The combined use of site-specific criteria and a 'real-
  time' decision making management process allowed for suc-
  cessful completion  of the project with a minimal  effect on
  water quality.
  Specifications:  Pub. in Canadian Technical Report Fisher-
  ies  and Aquatic Sciences,  v1(1774) p76-79 1991.  Proceed-
  ings of the Annual Toxicology Workshop (17th), Vancouver,
  BC (Canada). 5p.
  Subject index keywords: Dredging, Water pollution monitor-
  ing, Polychlorinated biphenyls.
 1575  CERCLA Site Discharges to POTWS CERCLA Site
  Sampling Program: Detailed Data Report
  Order Number PB91-921270CDH, price: PC A12/MF A02
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC.  Office of
  Emergency and Remedial  Response; Aug 90
  The document contains wastewater data obtained from sam-
  pling  at  seventeen  CERCLA  sites  during a   study  of
  wastewater discharges from CERCLA sites to publicly owned
  treatment works (POTWs). The document serves  as an ap-
  pendix to the report summarizing the findings of the CERCLA
  site sampling  program in Section 3  (CERCLA  Site Data
  Report) in the USEPA  CERCLA Site Discharges to POTWs
  Treatability Manual.
  Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing  Order, de-
  posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
  and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
   paper copy or microfiche.  251 p.
   Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
   Hazardous materials, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
   Response, Publicly Owned Treatment Works.
  308

-------
 1576  CERCLA Site Discharges to POTWs: Guidance
   Manual
   Order Number PB90-274531CDH, price: PC A11/MF A02
   hnwonmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC Office of
   Emergency and Remedial Response; Aug 90
   The purpose of the guidance manual is to provide the cur-
   n?^69  f°^ framework and technical and administrative
   guidance that is necessary for a Feasability Study (FS) evalu-
   ating the  remedial  alternative  of discharging wastes  from
   Comprehensive  Environmental  Response,  Compensation
   and Liability Act (CERCLA) sites to POTWs. The  remedial a^
   ternative .s to  be evaluated and compared to other alterna-

          6edhin thS FS" The POTW dischar9e alternate
         <    discharging untreated or pretreated wastes to a
         A   .*reatment and  disposal. Aqueous wastes  from
        r  S|tes can  constitute a majority of  waste treated
        remedial clean-up efforts. These wastes can include
  groundwater, leachate, surface runoff, and other aqueous
  VVclSlSS.
  Specifications: Also available from Supt. of Docs. 226p.
  Subject index keywords: Water pollution, Ground  water
        trfa*ment' Waste  water  disposal,  Industrial  waste
         es          act'0ns' Sewa9e treatment plants,  Site

15Manuaf RCLA Site Discharges to POTWS Treatability

  Order Number PB91-921269CDH, price: PC$77 00
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
  Emergency and Remedial Response; Aug 90
  The CERCLA Site Discharges to POTWs Treatability Manual
  SPThPared f°r  the U'S- EPA under Contract No. 68-03-
  mttL   tma,nua is.a comPilat'on of mostly technical infor-
  tmatl°n a treatability  data obtained in a study  conducted by
  the Office  of Water Regulations and  Standards Industrial
  Techno ogy Division  (OWRS-ITD) on Comprehensive Envi-
  rppri"!    RfsP°nse'  Compensation,  and  Liability   Act
  k SJ waf ew5ter  discharges to POTWs.  The information
  is provided  to aid  in  the evaluation of the feasibility of  dis-
                    .
 Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order de-
 posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada
 and Mexico;  all others $400). Single copies also available in
 paper copy or microfiche. 631 p.
 Subject index  keywords: Superfund,  Waste management
 Hazardous materials,  Manuals, Office  of  Solid Waste  and
 Emergency Response, Publicly Owned Treatment Works.
                     Bay Nearshore/Tideflats Feasibility
 Study Development of Sediment Cleanup Goals
 Order Number PB93-181253CDH, price: PC A05/MF A01
 S£    ^ln*;;,BeueVue' WA'; PTI Environmental Services,
 Bellevue, WA.*Washington State Dept. of Ecology
 Olympia.*Environmental Protection Agency, Seattle WA
 Region X; Feb 89
 The document develops  and evaluates  sediment  cleanup
 goals for the implementation of sediment remedial action al-
 ternatives in  identified problem areas of Commencement
 Bay. Tasks incorporated in the report are: compilation of in-
 terim sediment cleanup goals (including identification of avail-
™i   Sfd'men,t  clualitv values and development of additional
values , development of options for cleanup goals that relate
to applicable regulatory mandates, and refinement of Com-
                                                                   TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION-
                                                               Surface Water & Sludge Treatment Technologies
   mencement Bay remedial investigation guidelines for prioritiz-
   ing problem chemicals for use in evaluating the  need for
   source control actions.
   Specifications:  See also PB93-181220. Sponsored by PTI
   Environmental Services,  Bellevue, WA., Washington  State
   Dept.  of Ecology,  Olympia, and  Environmental Protection
   Agency, Seattle, WA. Region X. 91 p.
   Subject index keywords: Sediments, Commencement Bay,
   Remedial action, Water pollution control, Superfund, Waste
   disposal, Cleanup operations.

 1579  Commencement Bay Nearshore/Tideflats Feasibility
   Study. Executive Summary
   Order Number PB93-181220CDH, price: PC A06/MF A02
   Tetra Tech, Inc., Bellevue, WA.; Washington State Dept. of
   Ecology, Olympia.'Environmental Protection Agency, Seattle
   WA. Region X; Dec 88
   The report summarizes the findings of the feasibility study
   prepared for the waterways/shoreline portion of the Com-
   mencement  Bay  Nearshore/Tideflats Superfund  site  in
   Tacoma, Washington.  The purpose of the feasibility study
   was to develop and evaluate the most appropriate remedial
   strategies for correcting the human  health and environmental
   impacts associated  with contaminated sediments in the site.
  Specifications:    See also  PB93-181238,   PB86-104551
  through  PB86-104601. Sponsored by  Washington  State
  Dept. of Ecology, Olympia, and  Environmental  Protection
  Agency, Seattle, WA. Region X. 108p.
  Subject index  keywords: Sediments, Water pollution  con-
  trol,  Remedial  action, Commencement  Bay,  Superfund,
  Waste disposal, Cleanup operations.

1580  Commencement Bay Nearshore/Tideflats Feasibility
  Study. Volume 1
  Order Number PB93-181238CDH, price: PC A25/MF A06
  Tetra Tech, Inc., Bellevue, WA.;  Washington State Dept of
  Ecology, Olympia.*Environmental Protection Agency Seattle
  WA. Region X; Dec 88
  The report documents the feasibility study prepared  for the
  waterways/shoreline  portion  of the  Commencement  Bay
  Nearshore/Tideflats Superfund site in Tacoma, Washington.
  The purpose of  the  feasibility  study was to develop  and
  evaluate the most appropriate remedial strategies for correct-
  ing the documented  biological,  human health and environ-
  mental impacts associated with contaminated sediments in
 the site. Given the large study area, the multiplicity of con-
 taminant  sources, and  the diversity  of ongoing  activities
 within the site, the development of the recommended reme-
 dial strategies differ in many respects from the reports and
 implementation strategies at more traditional Superfund sites.
 Specifications:   See  also PB93-181246.  Sponsored by
 Washington State Dept. of Ecology, Olympia,  and Environ-
 mental Protection Agency, Seattle, WA. Region X. 592p.
 Subject  index keywords: Sediments, Water pollution con-
 trol,  Commencement  Bay,  Remedial  action, Superfund
 Waste disposal, Cleanup operations.
                                                                                                           309

-------
TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION:
Surface Water & Sludge Treatment Technologies
1581   Commencement Bay Nearshore/Tideflats Feasibility
  Study. Volume 2. Appendices
  Order, Number PB93-181246CDH, price: PC A18/MF A04
  Tetra tech, Inc., Bellevue, WA.; Washington State Dept. of
  Ecology, Olympia.*Environmental Protection Agency, Seattle,
  WA. Region X; Dec 88
  The report documents the feasibility study prepared for the
  waterways/shoreline portion  of  the Commencement Bay
  Nearshore/Tideflats Superfund site in Tacoma, Washington.
  The purpose  of the  feasibility  study was to develop and
  evaluate the most appropriate remedial strategies for correct-
  Ing the documented biological, human health and environ-
  mental  Impacts associated with contaminated sediments in
  the site. Given the  large study area, the  multiplicity of con-
  taminant  sources,  and  the diversity  of  ongoing activities
  within the site, the development of the recommended reme-
  dial strategies differ in many respects from the reports and
  implementation strategies at more traditional Superfund sites.
  Volume 2 contains the  following  appendices: evaluation of
  sediment recovery^details of dredging and capping technol-
  ogies, specifications of major ARARs and  TCBs, methods for
  estimating costs  of sediment remedial alternatives, source
   loading data, sampling  station locations, field survey data
   repcSrt- May  1986.
   Specifications:   See  also PB93-181253.  Sponsored  by
   Washington  State Dept. of Ecology, Olympia, and Environ-
   mental Protection Agency, Seattle, WA. Region X. 408p.
   Subject index keywords: Sediments, Water pollution con-
   trol,  Commencement  Bay,  Remedial   action,  Superfund,
   Waste disposal, Cleanup operations.
 1582 Dealing with Toxic Polluted Sediments in the Great
   Lakes Basin
   Order Number AD-P006 908/8CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
   Envjronmental Protection Agency, Chicago, IL. Great Lakes
   National Program Office; Apr 92
   The United  States and  Canada signed the Great  Lakes
   Water Quality Agreement  in 1972. In 1978, the Agreement
   was expanded to cover pollution  from toxic chemicals. Since
   1973 the Great Lakes Water Quality Board  has identified
   spe'cific areas such as  harbors, river mouths, and connecting
   channels as geographic  areas of concern. Now the major
   problem In  the majority of these areas  is in-place polluted
   sediments. The Water Quality Board instituted a new  ranking
   system for  these  areas in 1985. The purpose  of the new
   system is to encourage progress and to allow the Board to
   report the status of investigatory and remedial activities ac-
   curately. The United States and Canada have banned  pro-
   duction and use of certain toxic compounds such as DDT,
   diejdrln,  and PCB's. The concentrations of  these chemicals
   In fish have decrease! over the  last several years. Now the
   concentrations seem to be leveling-off,  probably due to the
    continuing reservoir in  the sediments. The highest concentra-
    tions of PCB's, up to 520,000 ppm, are found in Waukegan
    Harbor.  The design of the proposed remedial action, under
    the United  States Superfund authority, has been completed
    for Waukegan.
    Specifications: this article is from 'Management of Bottom
    Sediments  Containing  Toxic Substances: Proceedings of the
    U.S./Japan Experts Meeting (12th) Held  in Yokohama, Japan
    on11-14 November 1986', AD-A253 002, p257-267. 11 p.
    Subject index keywords: Great lakes,  Pollution, Sediments,
    Bas!ns(Geographic), Toxic hazards.
1583  Development and Use of Site-Specific Chemical and
  Biological Criteria for Assessing New Bedford Harbor
  Pilot Dredging Project
  Order Number PB91-182329CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
  Environmental Research Lab., Narragansett, Rl; c1991
  Numerical site-specific chemical and biological criteria were
  established to assess  the impact  of a pilot dredging project
  on water quality at the New Bedford Harbor, Massachusetts,
  USA  Superfund  site. Because most existing  chemical con-
  centrations in the water  column  and  indigenous biota ex-
  ceeded federal and  state water quality limits, the derivation
  of site-specific criteria was required. Prior to any operational
  phases of the project (i.e., dike construction, dredging), crite-
  ria values were developed from background  concentrations
  of PCBs and metals in water and biota, as well as for the
  toxic effects of water quality on the biota. During each oper-
  ational  phase of the project, water samples were collected,
  analyzed within 16  h, and the data supplied to a manage-
  ment committee  in order to assess the environmental impact
  of the previous days operation. The ambient unfiltered water
  concentration of PCBs and metals were the only chemical or
  biological criteria exceeded. Modification  of  the next days
  operations resulted  in a return of these concentrations to
  background levels. The combined use  of site-specific criteria
  and a  real-time decision making management  process  al-
  lowed for successful completion of the project with a minimal
  effect on water  quality. (Copyright (c) 1991  Springer-Verlag
   New York Inc.)
  Specifications:  Pub. in Environmental Management, v15 n1
   p105-112 1991.  10p.
   Subject index keywords: Water quality management, Water
   pollution, Dredging, Biological effects,  Water  chemistry, New
   Bedford Harbor.
 1584   DuPont/Oberlin Microfiltration Technology.
   Applications Analysis Report
   Order Number PB92-119023CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
   PRC Environmental Management, Inc., Chicago,  IL.;
   Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati,  OH. Risk
   Reduction Engineering Lab; Oct 91
   The DuPont/Oberlin microfiltration technology demonstration
   was conducted under the SITE  program at the  Palmerton
   Zinc Superfund site in Palmerton, Pennsylvania, in April and
   May  1990. During  the  demonstration, the  microfiltration
   system achieved zinc and total  suspended  solids (TSS) re-
   moval efficiencies  of about 99.95 percent, and a filter cake
   solids content of 41 percent. The filter cake contained no
   free liquids, and a  composite sample from all the demonstra-
   tion runs passed both the extraction procedure toxicity char-
   acteristic leaching  procedure (TCLP) test. The filtrate met ap-
    plicable  National  Pollutant  Discharge Elimination System
    permit limits for metals and TSS.
    Specifications: See also PB84-128677 and  PB90-144155.
    Sponsored by  Environmental  Protection Agency, Cincinnati,
    OH. Risk Reduction Engineering Lab.  62p.
    Subject index keywords: Water pollution  control, Hazard-
    ous materials,  Land pollution control, Superfund, Liquid fil-
    ters, Liquid wastes, Microfiltration, DuPont/Oberlin Microfiltra-
    tion Treatment System.
   310

-------
                                                                    TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION:
                                                                 Surface Water & Sludge Treatment Technologies
  1585  EPA/ORD (Environmental Protection Agency/Office
   of Research and Development) Role and Perspective in
   Sediment Research
   Order Number PB90-113093CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
   Environmental  Research Lab.-Duluth, MM; 1989
   Most chemical contaminants and organic  wastes in aquatic
   ecosystems  eventually accumulate in sediments where they
   may adversely affect  the benthic biota, become a source of
   contamination in the water column, accumulate in biological
   tissues, and  enter pelagic and human food chains. Contami-
   nated sediments now appear to be the main source of toxic
   pollutants  in  many bays, lakes, and rivers. Because of their
   potential adverse impacts, the long periods of time associat-
   ed with natural assimilation of many in-place pollutants, and
   the high costs of mitigation, sediments have become a focus
   of concern for many  of EPA's  research and regulatory pro-
   grams. Programs in which sediment quality assessments are
   currently required include ocean dumping, NEPA review, Su-
   perfund, and  estuarine protection. The documents addresses
   regulatory  applications,  current and future sediment  quality
   criteria needs, and both chemical specific  and nonchemical
   specific sediment quality  evaluations. Mitigation/prevention
   of sediment quality problems  are identified and five kinds of
   predictive methods are suggested, as well as future research
   to develop more sensitive testing .capabilities.
   Specifications:  13p.
   Subject  index  keywords: Sediments,  Research projects
   Water pollution, US EPA, Sediment-water interfaces.

 1586  Evaluating Amphibian Responses in  Wetlands
   Impacted by Mining Activities in the Western United
   States
   Order Number PB91-191106CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
   Corvallis Environmental Research Lab., OR.; ManTech
   Environmental Technology, Inc., Corvallis, OR; 1991
   An increasing awareness of declining amphibian populations
   in the United  States requires that the authors develop strate-
   gies for evaluating anthropogenic impacts  on  wetlands and
   the biota dependent upon these  habitats. For example,  in the
   western United States, mining activities may impact a wet-
   land and its biota directly through habitat destruction or run-
   off of sediments and contaminants  generated  during mining
   operations. Amphibians  which frequent  these   transition
   zones between terrestrial and aquatic habitats may be key
   biological indicators of a wetland's status. Through a demon-
   stration  project located  in  the  mining  regions of western
   Montana, the  authors are currently using laboratory and field
  methods for a wetland evaluation required within  a Super-
  fund ecological risk assessment.
  Specifications:  Pub.  in  Proceedings: Thorne Symposium
  Apr 91. Prepared in cooperation with ManTech Environmen-
  tal Technology, Inc., Corvallis, OR. 41 p.
  Subject index  keywords:  Mining,  Environmental  impacts,
  Amphibia, Habitability, Water pollution, Wetlands.

1587  Framework for Real-Time Decision-Making: New
  Bedford Harbor Pilot Dredging Study
  Order Number PB90-150822CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
  Environmental Research Lab., Narragansett,  Rl; Nov 89
  New Bedford Harbor is located along Buzzards  Bay between
  the cities of New Bedford  and Fairhaven, Mass. Since the
  1940s, electronics and  manufacturing companies in  the area
  have discharged effluents containing polychlorinated biphen-
  yls (PCBs) into the Acushnet River and the harbor. Over the
   past 15  years, nearly 18,000 acres  of  PCB-  and heavy
   metals-contaminated  sediment have been  identified,  with
   PCB concentrations as  high  as  100,000 parts  per million
   (ppm) in  some areas of  the upper harbor. In 1982,  the site
   was added to the Environmental  Protection Agency's (EPA)
   National  Priorities List of hazardous waste sites slated for
   cleanup under the Superfund Act.  A feasibility study conduct-
   ed by EPA in 1984 proposed several alternatives for the re-
   mediation of NBH including  dredging  contaminated  sedi-
   ments out of the harbor. Federal, State, and local  officials, as
   well as the public, expressed  concern  over dredging. Many
   believed that sediments resuspended during dredging would
   cause the release  of contaminants that would affect biota in-
   habiting both the harbor and Buzzards Bay. Others cited po-
   tential pollution problems from contaminated water (leachate)
   leaking from the proposed disposal site. In order  to address
   these  concerns, the EPA decided to pre-test dredging  and
   possible disposal options.
   Specifications:  14p.
   Subject index keywords: Decision  making,  New  Bedford
   Harbor, Dredging, Waste disposal,  Real time operations, Risk
   assessment, Water pollution  sampling,  Polychlorinated  bi-
   phenyls, Heavy metals, Cleanup operations.

 1588  Handbook for Constructed Wetlands Receiving Acid
   Mine Drainage
   Order Number PB93-233914CDH, price: PC A13/MF A03
   Colorado School of Mines, Golden.; Knight Piesold and Co.,
   Denver, CO.**Camp, Dresser and McKee, Inc., Denver,
   CO.*Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk
   Reduction Engineering Lab; Sep 93
   In the summer of 1987, a pilot constructed wetland was built
   at the Big  Five Tunnel in Idaho Springs, Colorado.  The report
   details the theory,  design and  construction of wetlands re-
   ceiving acid mine drainages, based on the  second and third
   year of operation of this wetland,  which  was  funded  by  the
   U.S. Environmental  Protection Agency  under  the  SITE
   Emerging Technologies Program. The text is divided into two
   broad sections: Part A - Theoretical Development, and Part B
   - Design Consideration. In the latter sections  of Part A and
  through all of Part  B the  focus is  on removal of  metals by
  precipitation of sulfides through the activity of sulfate reduc-
  ing bacteria.
  Specifications:   See also PB93-190734. Prepared in coop-
  eration  with Knight Piesold and Co., Denver, CO., and  Camp,
  Dresser and McKee, Inc., Denver,  CO. Sponsored by Envi-
  ronmental  Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk  Reduction
  Engineering Lab. 252p.
  Subject Index keywords: Acid mine drainage,  Wetlands,
  Water pollution control, Created  wetlands.

1589  Handbook: Responding to Discharges of Sinking
  Hazardous Substances
  Order Number PB91-228346CDH, price: PC A13/MF A03
  Science Applications International Corp., McLean, VA.;
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington,  DC.  Office of
  Emergency and Remedial Response.*Coast Guard,
  Washington, DC; Sep 87
  The document provides guidance on the response to spills of
  chemicals that sink  in water bodies and contaminate bottom
  materials. It describes the decisionmaking process associat-
  ed with defining  spill parameters and impacts  and selecting
  appropriate response measures. It also describes the clean-
                                                                                                               311

-------
TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION:
Surface Water & Sludge Treatment Technologies
  up arid mitigative technologies that may be used, including
  containment, removal, treatment, disposal, and in situ tech-
  niques. The document provides governmental and industrial
  technical personnel with the means to respond to  bottom
  material contamination situations, whether for quick response
  or for long-term remediation.
  Specifications:   Sponsored by Environmental Protection
  Agency, Washington, DC. Office of Emergency and Remedial
  Response, and Coast Guard, Washington, DC.  290p.
  Subject Index keyworls: Handbooks, Hazardous materials
  spills, Water pollution effects, Bottom sediments, Waste dis-
  posal, Remedial response.
 1590   New Methods for Modeling the Transport of Metals
  froiri Mineral Processing Wastes into Surface Waters
  Order Number PB91-2i9097CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
  AScI Corp., Athens, GA.; Environmental Research Lab.,
  Athens, GA; c1991
  The estimation of contaminant  fluxes  into and within river
  basins is the aim of the research.  These new methods for
  estimating contaminant loadings and fate on  a comprehen-
  sive basin scale based on assembled subsite behaviors have
  been demonstrated for a collection  of Superfund sites in  the
  Upper Clark Fork River basin in Montana. This portion of the
  demonstration illustrates a new set of techniques for  estimat-
  ing the overland and surface water movement of mine waste
  constituents. A linked assessment system-consisting of con-
  taminant transformation, nonpoint source and groundwater
  mixing and transport, surface hydrology and erosion,  and sur-
  face water quality  models-has been developed,  written,
  tested, and applied at the site.  Principal portions of the as-
  sessment system are described. The object of the project is
  to show the importance of comparing phenomenological hy-
  potheses with field observations for  large-scale exposure
  models.  Graphs of the  river copper concentration  show  a
  good fit between the measured and predicted concentrations
  at  some stations,  whereas substantial deviations from field
   measurements are"  observed at  other  stations  along  the
  course of the river. (Copyright  (c)  1991 by Marcel  Dekker,
   Inc.)
   Specifications:   Pub. in Jnl. of Environmental Science  and
   Health, vA26  n2  p157-203 Feb 91. Sponsored by  Environ-
   mental Research  Lab., Athens, GA. 49p.
   Subject Index keywords: Metals, Water pollution, Mathe-
   matical models, Path of pollutants, Mine wastes.
 1591   SITE-Emerging Technologies: Laser Induced
   Photochemical Oxldative Destruction of Toxic Organics
   In  Leachates and Groundwaters
   Order Number PB93-131431CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
   Energy and Environmental Engineering, Inc., Somerville, MA.
   Research and Development Div.; Environmental Protection
   Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk Reduction Engineering  Lab;
   Dec 92
   The technology described in the report has been developed
   under the Emerging  Technology Program of the Superfund
   Innovative Technology Evaluation (SITE) Program to  photo-
   chemically oxidize organic compounds in wastewater  by ap-
   plying ultraviolet radiation  using  an  excimer laser. The energy
   supplied by the laser is sufficient to stimulate photochemical
   reactions between the organics and hydrogen peroxide em-
   ployed as a chemical oxidant, causing photooxidation and/or
   phototransformation of the toxic species to  carbon dioxide,
   water and the corresponding halogenated acid. The  photo-
 chemical reaction is capable of producing the complete de-
 struction of low to moderate concentrations of toxic organics
 in water. Optimum conditions for the complete destruction of
 several different classes of compounds were developed and
 demonstrated in the laboratory.
 Specifications:   Sponsored  by Environmental Protection
 Agency, Cincinnati, OH.  Risk Reduction Engineering Lab.
 58p.
 Subject index keywords: Water pollution control, Organic
 compounds, Oxidation, Photochemical reactions, Superfund
 Innovative  Technology Evaluation Program, Laser induced
 reactions.
1592  SITE Program Demonstration of the SBP
 Technologies, Inc., Membrane Filtration System on
 Creosote-Contaminated Water
 Order Number PB93-228567CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
 Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk
 Reduction Engineering Lab.; Science Applications
  International Corp., Hackensack, NJ; c1993
 The formed-in-place membrane filtration system offered by
  SBP Technologies,  Inc. of Stone Mountain, GA was evaluat-
  ed by the USEPA SITE Program. The SITE Program Demon-
  stration was accomplished at the American Creosote Works
  site in Pensacola, FL in October 1991. The system effective-
  ly performed an 82% volume reduction, and removed greater
  than 95% of higher molecular weight PAHs and 92% of total
  PAHs  from the permeate stream. The permeate stream
  SVOC concentration averaged 22.8 mg/L over the six-day
  period. This stream was determined to be acceptable for dis-
  charge to the local POTW. The  membrane system tested
  was not very effective at removing lower molecular weight
  compounds (ca. 18%) such as phenolics. Of the total SVOCs
  present, ca. 75% removals were achieved. For each 2000
  gallons treated, ca. 200 gallons of wash water were utilized;
  ca. 8% of contaminants were distributed to the washwater.
  Estimates of capital and operating costs are between $202
  and $675 per 1000 gallons treated  (not including costs of
  final disposal).
  Specifications:  Pub. in Jnl. of the Air and Waste Manage-
  ment Association, v43 n3 p367-370 Mar 93. Prepared in co-
  operation  with Science  Applications  International  Corp.,
  Hackensack, NJ. 7p.
  Subject index keywords: Superfund, Membranes, Filtration,
  Water pollution control,  SITE(Superfund Innovative Technolo-
  gy Evaluation).
 1593  Technology Evaluation Report. SITE Program
  Demonstration, Resources Conservation Company,
  Basic Extractive Sludge Treatment (B.E.S.T. (Trade
  Name)), Grand Calumet River, Gary, Indiana. Volume 1
  Order Number PB93-227122CDH, price: PC A08/MF A02
  Science Applications International Corp., McLean, VA.;
   Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk
   Reduction Engineering Lab; Jul 93
   The report summarizes the findings  of an evaluation of the
   Basic Extractive Sludge Treatment (B.E.S.T.) solvent extrac-
   tion technology developed by Resources Conservation Com-
   pany  (RCC).  During the  demonstration test, the B.E.S.T.
   system was  used to treat composited  sediments from two
   areas of the Grand Calumet River. Contaminant  concentra-
   tion reductions of 96 percent for total polynuclear aromatic
   hydrocarbons (PAHs) and greater than 99 percent for total
  312

-------
                                                                   TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION:
                                                               Surface Water & Sludge Treatment Technologies
   polychiorinated biphenyls (PCBs)  were achieved for  Sedi-
   ment A. Contaminant  concentration  reductions of greater
   than 99 percent for total PAHs and greater than 99 percent
   for total PCBs were achieved for Sediment B. Removal effi-
   ciencies in excess of 98 percent were realized for both sedi-
   ments for oil and grease (O&G).
   Specifications: Also available in set  of 4 reports PC  E99/
   MF E99, PB93-227114. See also  Volume 2, Part 1, PB93-
   227130.  Sponsored  by Environmental  Protection  Agency,
   Cincinnati, OH. Risk Reduction Engineering Lab. 154p.
   Subject index keywords: Pollution control, Solvent extrac-
   tion, Superfund.

 1594  Technology Evaluation Report. SITE Program
   Demonstration, Resources Conservation Company,
   Basic Extractive Sludge Treatment (B.E.S.T. (Trade
   Name)), Grand Calumet River, Gary, Indiana. Volume 2.
   Part 1
   Order Number PB93-227130CDH, price: PC A24/MF A04
   Science Applications International Corp., McLean, VA.;
   Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk
   Reduction Engineering Lab; Jul 93
   The report  summarizes  the findings of an evaluation of the
   Basic Extractive Sludge Treatment (B.E.S.T.) solvent extrac-
   tion technology developed by Resources Conservation Com-
   pany (RCC).  During  the  demonstration  test, the  B.E.S.T.
   system was used to treat composited sediments from two
   areas of the Grand  Calumet  River. Contaminant concentra-
  tion reductions of 96 percent for total polynuclear aromatic
   hydrocarbons (PAHs) and greater than 99 percent for  total
   polychiorinated biphenyls  (PCBs) were achieved for Sedi-
   ment A.  Contaminant concentration reductions of greater
  than 99 percent for total PAHs and greater than 99 percent
  for total  PCBs were  achieved for Sediment B. Removal effi-
  ciencies in excess of 98 percent were realized for both sedi-
  ments for oil and grease (O&G).
  Specifications: Also available in set of 4 reports PC E99/
  MF E99,  PB93-227114. See  also  Volume 1, PB93-227122
  and Volume 2, Part 2, PB93-227148. Sponsored by Environ-
  mental  Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH.  Risk  Reduction
  Engineering Lab. 556p.
  Subject  index keywords: Pollution control, Solvent extrac-
  tion, Superfund.

1595  Technology Evaluation Report. SITE Program
  Demonstration, Resources Conservation Company,
  Basic Extractive Sludge Treatment (B.E.S.T. (Trade
  Name)), Grant Calumet  River, Gary, Indiana. Volume 2.
  Part 2 i
  Order Number PB93-227148CDH, price: PC$119.00
  Science Applications  International Corp., McLean, VA.;
  Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk
  Reduction Engineering Lab; Jul 93
  The report summarizes the findings of an evaluation of the
  Basic Extractive Sludge Treatment (B.E.S.T.) solvent extrac-
  tion technology developed by Resources Conservation Com-
  pany  (RCC).  During  the  demonstration test, the  B.E.S.T.
  system was used to  treat composited sediments from two
  areas of the Grand Calumet River. Contaminant concentra-
  tion reductions of 96 percent for total polynuclear aromatic
  hydrocarbons (PAHs) and greater than 99 percent  for total
  polychiorinated biphenyls  (PCBs) were achieved for Sedi-
  ment  A.  Contaminant concentration reductions of greater
  than 99 percent for total PAHs and greater than 99 percent
  for total PCBs were achieved for Sediment B. Removal effi-
  ciencies in excess of 98 percent were realized for both sedi-
  ments for oil and grease (O&G).
  Specifications: Also available in set of 4  reports PC E99/
  MF E99,  PB93-227114. See  also Volume  2, Part 1, PB93-
  227130 and Volume  2, Part 3, PB93-227155. Sponsored by
  Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk Re-
  duction Engineering Lab. 726p.
  Subject index keywords: Pollution control, Solvent extrac-
  tion, Superfund.

1596  Technology Evaluation Report. SITE Program
  Demonstration, Resources Conservation Company,
  Basic Extractive Sludge Treatment (B.E.S.T. (Trade
  Name)), Grand Calumet River, Gary, Indiana. Volume 2.
  Parts
  Order Number PB93-227155CDH, price: PC A11/MF A03
  Science Applications International Corp., McLean, VA.;
  Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk
  Reduction Engineering Lab; Jul 93
  The report summarizes the findings of an evaluation of the
  Basic Extractive Sludge Treatment (B.E.S.T.) solvent extrac-
  tion technology developed  by  Resources Conservation Com-
  pany (RCC). During  the demonstration  test,  the  B.E.S.T.
  system was used to treat composited sediments from two
  areas of the Grand Calumet River.  Contaminant concentra-
  tion reductions of 96 percent for total  polynuclear aromatic
  hydrocarbons (PAHs) and  greater than 99  percent for total
  polychiorinated biphenyls (PCBs) were achieved for Sedi-
  ment A.  Contaminant concentration reductions of  greater
  than 99 percent for total PAHs and greater than 99  percent
  for total PCBs were achieved  for Sediment  B. Removal effi-
  ciencies in excess of 98 percent were realized for both sedi-
  ments for oil and grease (O&G).
  Specifications: Also available in  set of 4 reports PC E99/
  MF E99, PB93-227114. See also Volume 2, Part 2, PB93-
  227148. Sponsored by  Environmental Protection Agency,
  Cincinnati, OH. Risk Reduction Engineering Lab. 230p.
  Subject index keywords:  Pollution control, Solvent  extrac-
 tion, Superfund.
                                                                                                             313

-------

-------

-------
ii:i*ii»	la^^                               IIIIM^^^	niiiin^^^^	iiiiiiiB^^^^^                                 L:;!,I s
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                             iniiiiii'i
                                                                                                                                                                                        !iii:iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiniii!!::ii!!:i;itii!fi!!i!
                                          ''HlEliiiillPlliiill'ihill!	ii	iillpiiiLilpllilllpiplPlllljlllPIPIIC'iinLPI	lllllllllll'liiUtiiiP'PliillliniipTlllliEI'i;  llllllllllillllilllll'lilillllllll'I'ILill''''!^!'!'!!!!!''!!!!!!!''!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!	IllPilm1
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           I'l'              'I,
I'll ..... I  |
          ...... I .....   l .....  I  |   ...... |  I
         Hill   III 1111 III II ..... Ill   I
 111   III  I     III III! JII III I! II    III III ill  Hill     II nilllllllllllll

  nun  i mi in     n  in nil ill i  |      n in nn in in i    i mini in

l|  III   IInil  I    iillilllillll   III    Illlllllll ill   ill  I III  i
                         I
                                                                                                                                                                                  n  n i in   in inn in  n  11   inn  11   nn     n  n in inn in iininni   i   n  i nn nn nil  n  n  nn   nn inn i

                                                                                                                                                                                   i    i niii  in n ii i  ii    i    ii  n i   in  i     in n i inn  i ill i   in HIM  in iiiiinn    n   n  nn  inn
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                          in    iiiiiiiini  i  iiiinnn i
                                                                                                                                                                                  I   III  II
                                                                                                                                                                                                                          I  111  III  I Illlllllll   11   V  11111  H    Illlllllll     Illlllllll

-------
Subject Index

-------
        Subject  Index Sample  Entry
                         Documents in this index are listed alphabetically
                         under various subjects.
            Subject Heading -

                  Title -

           Reference number •
•Acetic Acid
. Health Effects Assessment for 2,4,5-Trichlorophenoxy Acedic
Acid (2,4,5-T)
-See 1050
iiiiiiiL ;i
-------
                                                    SUBJECT  INDEX
 90 DAY STUDY
     Management Review of the Superfund Pro-
     gram: Implementation Plan.
     See 0102
 ABANDONED SITES
     Evaluation of Cleanup  Levels for Remedial
     Action at CERCLA (Comprehensive Environ-
     mental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
     ity Act)  Sites Based on a Review  of  EPA
     (Environmental  Protection Agency) Records
     of Decision.
     See 1245
 ABSORPTION (BIOLOGY)
     Extraction  of  Mercury from  Groundwater
     Using Immobilized Algae.
     See 1450
 ACETIC ACID
     Health Effects Assessment for 2,4,5-Trichlor-
     ophenoxy Acetic Acid (2,4,5-T).
     See 1050
 ACETONE
     Updated  Health  Effects Assessment for Ace-
     tone.
     See 1080
 ACID MINE DRAINAGE
     Handbook for Constructed Wetlands  Receiv-
     ing Acid Mine Drainage.
     See 1588
 ACID VOLATILE SULFIDES
     Acid Volatile Sulfide Predicts the Acute Tox-
     icity of Cadmium and Nickel  in Sediments.
     See 1572
 ADIPOSE TISSUE
     Identification of SARA  (Superfund Amend-
     ments and  Reauthorization Act) Compounds
     in Adipose Tissue.
     See 1055
 ADMINISTRATIVE PERSONNEL
     Authorization for Regional Administrators to
     Approve  Consistency Exemptions  at  NPL
     Sites.
     See 0998
 ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES
     Presumptive Remedies: Policy and  Proce-
     dures.
     See 1103
     Superfund  Administrative   Improvements:
     Reinventing Superfund.
    See 0312
 AEROBIC PROCESSES
     Evaluation and Testing of a Protocol to  De-
    termine the Aerobic Degradation Potential of
    Hazardous Waste Constituents in Soil.
    See 1503
    Guide for  Conducting Treatability  Studies
    under  CERCLA:  Aerobic  Biodegradation
    Remedy Screening.
    See 1156
    Guide for  Conducting Treatability  Studies
    under  CERCLA:  Aerobic  Biodegradation
    Remedy Screening. Interim Guidance.
    See 1157
    Guide for Conducting Treatability  Studies
    under   CERCLA:  Aerobic  Biodegradation
    Remedy  Screening.  Quick Reference Fact
    Sheet.
    See 1158
AIR ACTION LEVELS
    Air/Superfund National Technical Guidance
    Study  Series: Evaluation of Short-Term Air
    Action Levels for Superfund Sites.
    See 1386
AIR FLOW
    In situ  Soil Vapor Extraction Treatment.
    See 1511
 AIR FORCE FACILITIES
     Installation Restoration  Program Technical
     Support  Document for Record of Decision,
     Tatalina Air Force Station LRRS Site.
     See 1277
 AIR PATHWAY ANALYSIS
     Engineering Bulletin: Air Pathway Analysis.
     See 1404
 AIR POLLUTION
     Air/Superfund National Technical Guidance
     Study Series. Development of Example Pro-
     cedures  for Evaluating the Air  Impacts of
     Soil Excavation Associated with Superfund
     Remedial Actions.
     See 1380
     Air/Superfund National Technical Guidance
     Study Series.  Emission  Factors for Super-
     fund Remediation Technologies.
     See 1381
     Air/Superfund National Technical Guidance
     Study Series. Volume 1. Application  of Air
     Pathway  Analyses for Superfund Activities.
     See 1390
     Air/Superfund National Technical Guidance
     Study Series.  Volume 2. Estimation of Base-
     line Air Emissions at Superfund Sites (Re-
    vised).
     See 1392
    Air/Superfund  National Technical Guidance
    Study Series.  Volume 4. Procedures for Dis-
     persion Modeling and Air Monitoring for Su-
    perfund Air Pathway Analysis.
    See 1394
    Engineering Bulletin:  Air Pathway Analysis.
    See 1404
    Environmental    Asbestos    Assessment
    Manual. Superfund Method for the Determi-
    nation of Asbestos in Ambient Air. Part 1.
    Method.
    See 1027
    Environmental     Asbestos    Assessment
    Manual. Superfund Method for the Determi-
    nation of Asbestos in Ambient Air. Part 2.
    Technical Background Document.
    See 1028
    Estimating VOC Emissions from Superfund
    Sites  in the Houston-Galveston Texas Area.
    (NNEMS Project No.  1302).
    See 1406
    Evaluation of Portable Gas Chromatographs.
    See 1479
    Guidance on Applying the Data Quality Ob-
    jectives Process for Ambient Air Monitoring
    Around Superfund Sites (Stage 3).
    See 0987
    Guidance on Applying the Data Quality Ob-
    jectives Process for Ambient Air Monitoring
    Around Superfund Sites (Stages 1  and 2).
    See 0988
    Superfund Guide: Clean Air  Act Hazardous
    Air  Pollutants Added  to the List of CERCLA
    Hazardous Substances.
    See 1151
AIR POLLUTION ABATEMENT
    Air/Superfund  National Technical Guidance
    Study Series:  Estimation of Air Impacts for
    Soil Vapor Extraction  (SVE) Systems.
    See 1383
    ARARs Fact  Sheet:  Compliance  with  the
    Clean Air Act and Associated Air Quality Re-
    quirements.
    See 0397
    SITE Demonstration of the  American Com-
    bustion Pyretron Oxygen-Enhanced Burner.
    See 1299
AIR POLLUTION CONTROL
    Air Stripping of Aqueous Solutions. Engineer-
    ing Bulletin.
    See 1371
     Air/Superfund  National  Technical Guidance
     Study  Series.   Models  for Estimating  Air
     Emission  Rates from Superfund Remedial
     Actions.
     See 1388
     CERCLA Removal Actions at Methane Re-
     lease Sites.
     See 0416
     Contingency Analysis Modeling  for Super-
     fund Sites and  Other Sources.
     See 1219
     Control of Air Emissions from Materials Han-
     dling during Remediation. Engineering Bulle-
     tin.
     See 1398
     Demonstration  of a Trial Excavation at the
     McColl Superfund Site.
     See 1226
     Evaluation of Emission  Factors for Formal-
     dehyde from Certain Wood Processing Oper-
     ations.  Final Report, May-August 1989.
     See 1410
     Operations and Research at the U.S. EPA
     Incineration  Research    Facility:   Annual
     Report for FY91.
     See 1484
     Pilot-Scale Incineration of Contaminated Soil
    from the Chemical Insecticide  Corporation
    Superfund Site.
    See 1523
    Control of Transient  Incinerator Emissions
    with an Oxygen Based Combustion System.
    See 1401
    Engineered Biofilter for  Removing  Organic
    Contaminants in Air.
    See 1403
    Foam Scrubbing (Chapter 9).
    See 1411
    Incineration Treatment of Arsenic-Contami-
    nated Soil.
    See 1268
    Pilot-Scale Incinerability  Evaluation  of  Ar-
    senic-and  Lead-Contaminated   Soils  from
    Two Superfund  Sites.
    See 1288
    Site Emerging Technologies: Bioscrubber for
    Removing Hazardous  Organic  Emissions
    from Soil, Water and Air Decontamination
    Processes.
    See 1302
AIR POLLUTION CONTROL  EQUIPMENT
    Control  of Air Emissions  from Superfund Air
    Strippers  at Superfund Groundwater Sites.
    See 1399
    Control  of Air  Emissions from  Superfund
    Sites.
    See 1400
    Incineration Data on Arsenic and Lead Emis-
    sions.
    See 1267
    Operations and Research at the U.S. EPA
    Incineration  Research.   Facility:   Annual
    Report for FY89.
    See 1482
    Operations and Research at the U.S. EPA
    Incineration   Research   Facility:   Annual
    Report for FY90.
    See 1483
    Potential  Surrogate  Metals for  Incinerator
   Trial Burns.
    See 1486
   SITE Demonstration of the American Com-
    bustion  Pyretron Oxygen-Enhanced  Burner.
   See 1299
                                                                                                                              SU-1

-------
AIR POLLUTION DETECTION
                                                        SUBJECT INDEX
AIR POLLUTION DETECTION
  ;;  Compendium of ERT Bald Analytical Proce-
    dure*.
    See 0902
  •  Canister-Based Method for Monitoring Toxic
    VOCs In Ambient Air.
    Soe 1396
    Superfund Innovative Technology  Evalua-
    tion: The Delaware SITE Study, 1989.
    See 1322
    Use of a Fourier Transform Spectrometer as
    a Remote Sensor at Superfund Sites.
    Sea 1365
AIR POLLUTION DISPERSION
  ir Comparison of ¥ Revised Area Source Algo-
    rithm for  the industrial Source  Complex
    Short Term Model and  Wind Tunnel Data.
    Soe 1216
    Instructional   Package on  Regulatory  Air
    Quality  Modeling. Part  1:  Videos on  the
    'Guideline on Air Quality Models (Revised)'
    and the  Model Clearinghouse (Video).
    Soe 1412
AIR POLLUTION EFFECTS (HUMANS)
    Afr/Superfund National Technical Guidance
    Series.  Superfund Air  Pathway  Analyses
    Review Criteria Checklists.
    See 1372
    Alr/Superfund National Technical Guidance
  ;: Study Series: Estimation of Air Impacts for
  	  Air Stripping of Contaminated Water.
    Sea 1382
AIR POLLUTION MONITORING
    Air/Superfund National Technical  Guidance
  :  Study Series. Contingency  Plans at Super-
    fund Sites Using Air Monitoring.
    See 1378
    Alr/Superfund National Technical  Guidance
    Study Series: Evaluation of Short-Term Air
    Action Levels for  Superfund Sites.
    See 1386
    Alr/Superfund National Technical  Guidance
    Study Series. Volume 1. Overview  of Air
    Pathway Assessments for  Superfund Sites
    (Revised).
    See 1391
  •  Alr/Superfund National Technical  Guidance
  : i Study Series. Volume 4. Guidance for Ambi-
  	ent Air  Monitoring at Superfund Sites  (Re-
  VTvWed).        	
    See 1393
    Assessing Potential  Indoor Air Impacts for
    Superfund  Sites.  Air/Superfund  National
    Technical Guidance Study Series.
  ,.  S««1395
    Field Standard Operating Procedures for Air
    Surveillance F.S.6.P. No. 8.
    See 0910
    Canistor-Based Method for Monitoring Toxic
    VOCs (n Ambient Air.
    See 1396
    Personnel  Protection through Reconnais-
    sance   Robotics  at  Superfund  Remedial
  "-  Sites,
    See 1286
 AIR POLLUTION MONITORS
    Ak/Suporfund National  Technical Guidance
    Study  Series: Applicability  of Open  Path
    Monitors for Superfund.
    See 1375
  •  Air/Superfund National  Technical Guidance
    Study Series: Compilation of Information on
    Real-Time tor Monitoring for Use at Super-
    fund Sites.
    See 1377
     Personal  Air Sampling and  Air Monitoring
     Requirements under 29 CFR 1910.120.
    See 0922
AIR POLLUTION SAMPLING
    Air/Superfund  National Technical Guidance
    Series.  Superfund  Air  Pathway Analyses
    Review Criteria Checklists.
    See 1372
    Air/Superfund  National Technical Guidance
    Study  Series.  Air  Emissions  from  Area
    Sources:   Estimating  Soil   and  Soil-Gas
    Sample Number Requirements.
    See 1373
    Air/Superfund  National Technical Guidance
    Study Series.  Database of  Emission Rate
    Measurement Projects.
    See 1379
    Air Superfund  National Technical Guidance
    Study Series.  Estimation of Air  Impacts for
    the Excavation of Contaminated Soil.
    See 1384
    Air/Superfund  National Technical Guidance
    Study Series.  Guideline for Predictive Base-
    line Emissions Estimation Procedures for Su-
    perfund Sites.
    See 1387
    Air Superfund National Technical Guidance
    Study Series. Screening Procedures for Esti-
    mating the Air Impacts of Incineration at Su-
    perfund Sites.
    See 1389
    Compendium  of ERT Air Sampling Proce-
    dures.
    See 0901
    Design Considerations for Ambient Air Moni-
    toring at Superfund Sites. Engineering Bulle-
    tin.
    See 1402
    Measurement  of   Volatile   Organic  Com-
    pounds during Start-Up of Bioremediation of
    French Limited  Superfund  Site in Crosby
    Texas  Using  Wind Dependent Whole-Air
    Sampling.
    See 1414
    Operations and  Research at the U.S. EPA
    Incineration   Research  Facility:  Annual
    Report for FY89.
    See 1482
    Comparison: Organic Emissions from  Haz-
    ardous Waste Incinerators versus the  1990
    Toxics Release Inventory Air Releases.
    See 1217
    Review and Evaluation of Area Source Dis-
    persion Algorithms  for Emission Sources at
    Superfund Sites.
    See 1416
    Sector Sampling for VOC's  during Remedi-
    ation  of Superfund Site at  Shaver's Farm,
    Georgia.
    See 1417
    Superfund  Innovative  Technology Evalua-
    tion: The Delaware  SITE Study, 1989.
    See 1322
 AIR QUALITY
    Review and Evaluation of Area Source Dis-
    persion Algorithms for Emission Sources at
    Superfund Sites.
    See 1416
 AIR SAMPLERS
    Canister-Based Method for Monitoring  Toxic
    VOCs  in Ambient Air.
    See 1396
 AIR SPARGING
    Citizen's Guide to Air Sparging.
    See 0452
 AIR STRIPPING
    Air Stripping of Aqueous Solutions. Engineer-
    ing Bulletin.
    See 1371
 ALABAMA
    National Priorities List Sites: Alabama.
    See 0148
    National Priorities List Sites: Alabama.
    See 0149
    National Priorities List Sites: Alabama, 1992.
    See 0150
    Site Enforcement Tracking System  (SETS):
    PRP Listing by Site for Alabama.
    See 0621
    Site Enforcement Tracking System  (SETS):
    PRP Listing by Site for Alabama.
    See 0622
    Site Enforcement Tracking System  (SETS):
    PRP Listing by Site for Alabama.
    See 0623
    Site Enforcement Tracking System  (SETS):
    PRP National Listing by Site.
    See 0833
ALASKA
    National Priorities List Sites: Alaska.
    See 0151
    National Priorities List Sites: Alaska.
    See 0152
    National  Priorities List Sites: Alaska, 1992.
    See 0153
ALGAE
    Extraction  of Mercury  from  Groundwater
    Using Immobilized Algae.
    See 1450
ALGASORB
    Extraction  of Mercury  from  Groundwater
    Using Immobilized Algae.
    See 1450
ALGORITHMS
    Comparison of a Revised Area Source Algo-
    rithm  for  the Industrial Source  Complex
    Short Term Model and  Wind Tunnel  Data.
    See 1216
ALTERNATIVE REMEDIAL CONTRACT
STRATEGY
    ARCS (Alternative Remedial Contract Strate-
    gy) Contracts Users' Manual.
    See 0019
    ARCS Work Assignment Management: Field
    Guide.
    See 0021
ALTERNATIVE REMEDIAL CONTRACTING
STRATEGY
    Initiatives to Streamline  the Alternative  Re-
    medial Contracting Strategy  (ARCS) Con-
    tracts' Award Fee Process.
    See 0033
    Performance  Tracking   under  ARCS Con-
    tracts.
    See 0061
ALTRNATIVE REMEDIAL CONTRACTING
STRATEGY
    Use of Time and Materials and Cost  Reim-
    bursement Subcontracts for Remedial  Ac-
    tions under the Alternative Remedial Con-
    tracting Strategy Contracts.
    See 1141
ALUMINIUM
    Draft Record of Decision for the Aluminum
    Smelter  Conservation/Modernization   Pro-
    gram.
    See 1087
AMBIENT AIR QUALITY
    Air/Superfund National  Technical  Guidance
    Study Series: Estimation of Air Impacts from
    Area  Sources of  Particulate Matter  Emis-
    sions at Superfund Sites.
    See 1385
    Estimation of Air Impacts for Bioventing  Sys-
    tems Used at Superfund Sites. Air/Super-
    fund  National Technical Guidance  Study
    Series.
    See 1407
 SU-2
  iiiti'
        	,,	uii,	;;	!	iiiilL 'ail .J,,.,,,,^ .":
                                                                             : i::,",(!•:	nil JiiiiliLsi	ti;

-------
                                                        SUBJECT INDEX
                                                                                                                    ASSESSMENTS
    Estimation of Air Impacts for  Solidification
    and Stabilization Processes Used at Super-
    fund Sites. Air/Superfund National Technical
    Guidance Study Series.
    See 1408
    Estimation of Air Impacts for Thermal De-
    sorption Units Used at Superfund Sites. Air/
    Superfund  National  Technical  Guidance
    Study Series.
    See 1409
AMERICAN INDIANS
    Revised Interim Final Guidance on Indian In-
    volvement in the Superfund Program.
    See 0484
AMERICAN SAMOA
    National  Priorities   List  Sites:  American
    Samoa, Guam, and the Trust Territories.
    See 0154
    National  Priorities  List  Sites:  The  United
    States Territories, 1992.
    See 0275
    Site Enforcement Tracking System  (SETS):
    PRP  Listing by Site for  American  Samoa.
    See 0624
    Site Enforcement Tracking System  (SETS):
    PRP  Listing by Site for  American  Samoa.
    See 0626
AMPHIBIA
    Evaluating Amphibian Responses  in Wet-
    lands Impacted by Mining Activities in the
    Western United States.
    See 1586
ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY
    Inorganic Contract  Compliance Screening
    System (ICCSS) Software (ILM02.1  Version
    2) (for Microcomputers).
    See 0036
    Inorganic Contract  Compliance Screening
    System (ICCSS) Software (ILM02.1 Version
    3) (for Microcomputers).
    See 0037
    Inorganic Contract  Compliance Screening
    System  (ICCSS)  Software  (SOW   March
    1990) (Version 1) (for Microcomputers).
    See 0040
    Inorganic Contract  Compliance Screening
    System Software for the PC (SOW  March
    1990 Version 1). User Manual.
    See 0041
    Organic  Contract  Compliance  Screening
    System (OCCSS) Software (OLM01.8 Ver-
    sion 3) (for Microcomputers).
    See 0050
    Organic  Contract  Compliance  Screening
    System (OCCSS) Software (SOW February
    1988) (for Microcomputers).
    See 0054
    Organic  Contract  Compliance  Screening
    System   (OCCSS) Software  (SOW   March
    1990) (Version 1) (for Microcomputers).
    See 0055
    Organic  Contract  Compliance  Screening
    System  (OCCSS) Software (SOW OLM01.8
    Version  January  1992)   (Version  1)  (for
    Microcomputers).
    See 0056
    Organic  Contract  Compliance  Screening
    System. Software for the  PC (OLM01.8 Ver-
    sion 1). User Manual.
    See 0057
    Organic  Contract  Compliance  Screening
    System. Software for the PC (SOW  March
    1990, Version 1). User Manual.
    See 0059
    Organic  Contract  Compliance  Screening
    System. Software for  the PC (Version June
    1990). User Manual.
    See 0060
 ANNELIDS
     On-Site Methods for  Assessing  Chemical
     Impact on the Soil Environment Using Earth-
     worms:  A  Case Study  at  the  Baird and
     McGuire Superfund Site, Holbrook,  Massa-
     chusetts.
     See 1521
 APPLICABLE OR RELEVANT AND
 APPROPRIATE REGULATIONS
     PAST: The Potential ARARs Selection Tool.
     See 0434
 APPLICABLE OR RELEVANT AND
 APPROPRIATE REQUIREMENTS
     ARARs  Q's and A's:  State  Ground-Water
     Antidegradation Issues.
     See 0402
     ARARs  Q's and A's:  The Fund-Balancing
     Waiver.
     See 0403
 AQUADETOX/SVE TREATMENT SYSTEM
     AWD Technologies  Integrated  AquaDetox
     (Trade Name)/SVE Technology: Applications
     Analysis Report.
     See 1202
     U.S. EPA SITE Demonstration of AWD Tech-
     nologies' AquaDetox/SVE System.
     See 1363
 AQUIFERS
     Measurement of Hydraulic Conductivity Dis-
     tributions: A Manual of Practice.
     See 1467
     New Approach and Methodologies for Char-
     acterizing  the Hydrogeologic  Properties  of
     Aquifers.
     See 1470
 ARIZONA
     National Priorities List Sites: Arizona and
     Nevada.
     See 0157
     National Priorities List Sites: Arizona and
     Nevada, 1992.
     See 0158
     Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
     PRP Listing by Site for Arizona.
    See 0627
    Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
     PRP Listing by Site for Arizona.
    See 0628
    Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
    PRP Listing by Site for Arizona.
    See 0629
ARKANSAS
    National Priorities List Sites: Arkansas.
    See 0159
    National Priorities List Sites: Arkansas.
    See 0160
    National Priorities List Sites: Arkansas, 1992.
    See 0161
    Site  Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
    PRP Listing by Site for Arkansas.
    See 0630
    Site  Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
    PRP Listing by Site for Arkansas.
    See 0631
    Site  Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
    PRP Listing by Site for Arkansas.
    See 0632
    Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Clean-
    up Efforts Nationwide, Spring 1993 (Old Mid-
    land Products Site Profile, Yell County, Ar-
    kansas).
    See 0957
ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
    EPA/USACE Payment Process: Direct Cite/
    Revised Reimbursement Methods.
    See 1126
 AROMATIC COMPOUNDS
    Chemical Dehalogenation Treatment: APEG
    Treatment.
    See 1210
    Control of Aromatic  Waste Air Streams by
    Soil Bioreactors.
    See 1496
 AROMATIC POLYCYCLIC HYDROCARBONS
    Technology Evaluation  Report: SITE  Pro-
    gram.  CF  Systems Organics  Extraction
    System,  New   Bedford,   Massachusetts.
    Volume 1.
    See 1346
    Technology Evaluation  Report: SITE  Pro-
    gram.  CF  Systems Organics  Extraction
    System,  New   Bedford,   Massachusetts.
    Volume 2.
    See 1347
 ARSENIC
    Incineration Data on Arsenic and Lead Emis-
    sions.
    See 1267
    Behavior of Arsenic in a Rotary Kiln Inciner-
    ator (Journal Version).
    See 1204
    Superfund Fact Sheet: Arsenic.
    See 0488
 ASBESTOS
    Environmental    Asbestos    Assessment
    Manual. Superfund Method for the Determi-
    nation of Asbestos in Ambient Air. Part 1.
    Method.
    See 1027
    Environmental    Asbestos    Assessment
    Manual. Superfund Method for the Determi-
    nation of Asbestos in Ambient Air. Part 2.
    Technical Background Document.
    See 1028
    Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Clean-
    up Efforts Nationwide,  Fall  1993  (Johns-
    Manville Site Profile, Illinois).
    See 0952
ASSESSMENT MONITORING
    CERCLA Off-Site Policy - Eligibility of Facili-
    ties in Assessment Monitoring.
    See 0414
ASSESSMENTS
    CERCLIS  Characterization  Project: National
    Results.
    See 0001
    CERCLIS Characterization Project: Region 1
    Results.
    See 0002
    CERCLIS Characterization Project: Region 2
    Results.
    See 0003
    CERCLIS Characterization Project: Region 3
    Results.
    See 0004
    CERCLIS Characterization Project: Region 4
    Results.
    See 0005
    CERCLIS Characterization Project: Region 5
    Results.
    See 0006
    CERCLIS Characterization Project: Region 6
    Results.
    See 0007
    CERCLIS Characterization Project: Region 7
    Results.
    See 0008
    CERCLIS Characterization Project: Region 8
    Results.
    See 0009
    CERCLIS Characterization Project Region 9
    Results.
    See 0010
                                                                                                                             SU-3

-------
ATMOSPHERIC DIFFUSION
          SUBJECT INDEX
    CERCLIS Characterization Project:  Region
    10 Results.
    S090011
    ECO Update. Volume  1, Number 5. August
    1992. Briefing the BTAG: Initial  Description
    ot Setting, History, and  Ecology of a Site.
    See 1023
    Guidance for Performing  Preliminary Assess-
    ments under CERCLA.
    S«e 0342
   "PA Review Checklist
    See 0366
ATMOSPHERIC DIFFUSION
    Review and Evaluation of Area Source Dis-
   , persion Algorithms for Emission  Sources at
   ;> Supotfund Sites.
    Seo 1416
AUDITING
    Audit  Management  Process.  Reference
   	Guide,
    Se«OOS5
    Audits and the Superfund Program Manager.
    SaeOOee
    Audits and the Superfund Program Manager.
    See 0087
   	Health  and Safety Audit Guidelines: SARA
    Title I, Section 126.
    See 0916
   • Involvement of Superfund Program  Manag-
   !	ars  In  Superfund  Response  Agreement
    Audits.
    Sea 0099
    SRIS System Overview and User's Guide.
    Soe0112
AUTHORIZATIONS  '[    	"
   liAutjwrizatkOT for Regional Administrators to
    Approve  Consistency Exemptions  at  NPL
   -Sites.
    Sea 0998
AUTOMOUSE SYSTEM
    AutoMOUSE:   An  Improvement   to  the
   I MOUSE Computerized Uncertainty Analysis
    System Operational  Manual.
    See  1201
B AND W CYCLONE FURNACE
    Babcock and Wllcox Cyclone Furnace Vitrifi-
    cation. Technology Demonstration Summary.
    Sea 1203
BASINS  (GEOGRAPHIC)
    Dealing with Toxic Polluted Sediments in the
   1 Great Lakes Basin.
    S«e 1582
BEN MODEL
   i BEN: A Model to Calculate the Economic
   !' Benefit of  Noncompliahce. User's  Manual.
    Se«0513
BENCH-SCALE EXPERIMENTS
   	Toxicfty Bloassay and Eluate Heavy Metals
    Analysis Results of the  Bench Scale Stabili-
    zation  Study  of  Soils from  the  United
    Chrome  Superfund  NPL (National  Priority
   • Usl) Site Corvaltis, Oregon.
    Sea 1546
BENEFIT COST ANALYSIS
    BEN: A  Model to  Calculate the Economic
    Benefit of  Noncompliance. User's  Manual.
    Seo 0513
   : BEN: A  Model to  Calculate the Economic
   ii; Benefits  of Noncompliance. User's  Manual
    (Revised).
    See 1205
    BEN Model: Calculates Violators' Economic
    Benefits from  Noncompliance (Version 4.0)
    (for  Microcomputers).
    See 0514
 BENZENE
    Superfund Fact Sheet: Benzene.
    Seo 0489
BENZENES
    Health Effects Assessment for Benzene.
    See 1035
BENZOFLUORANTHENE
    Toxicological          Profile          for
    Benzo(b)Fluoranthene.
    See 1360
BEST TECHNOLOGY
    Guidance Documents Relating  to  Landfills
    and Contaminants.
    See 1259
    Innovative  Technology: BEST Solvent Ex-
    traction Process.
    See 1270
BIBLIOGRAPHIES
    Bibliography of Federal Reports and Publica-
    tions Describing Alternative and Innovative
    Treatment   Technologies   for   Corrective
    Action and Site Remediation.
    See 1206
    Literature Survey of Innovative Technologies
    for  Hazardous  Waste  Site Remediation,
    1987-1991.
    See 1281
    OSWER Source Book. Volume  1. Training
    and Technology Transfer Resources, 1992-
    1993.
    See 1284
    OSWER Source Book. Volume  2. Training
    and Technology Transfer Resources, 1992-
    1993.
    See 1285
BIOASSAY
    Application of  Tradescantia  Micronucleus
    Assay for in  situ Evaluation of Potential Ge-
    netic Hazards from Exposure to Chemicals
    at a Wood-Preserving Site.
    See 1195
    Toxicological Implementations of Remediat-
    ing Hazardous Wastes.
    See 1359
BIODEGRADATION
    Control  of Aromatic Waste Air Streams by
    Soil Bioreaotors.
    See 1496
BIODETERIORATION
    Evaluation and Testing of a Protocol to De-
    termine the Aerobic Degradation Potential of
    Hazardous Waste Constituents in Soil.
    See 1503
    Guide  for Conducting Treatability  Studies
    under   CERCLA:  Aerobic Biodegradation
    Remedy Screening.
    See 1156
    Guide  for Conducting Treatability  Studies
    under   CERCLA:  Aerobic  Biodegradation
    Remedy Screening. Interim Guidance.
    See 1157
    Guide  for Conducting Treatability  Studies
    under   CERCLA:  Aerobic  Biodegradation
    Remedy Screening. Quick Reference Fact
    Sheet.
    See 1158
    Guide  for Conducting Treatability Studies
    under CERCLA: Biodegradation Remedy Se-
    lection. Quick Reference Fact Sheet.
    See 1160
    Innovative Technology: Slurry-Phase Biode-
    gradation.
    See 1271
    Biodegradation of Creosote and Pentachlor-
    ophenol  in  Contaminated  Groundwater:
    Chemical and Biological Assessment.
    See 1432
    Respirometric Methods for Determination of
    Biodegradability and Biodegradation Kinetics
    for  Hazardous  Organic   Pollutant  Com-
    pounds.
    See 1427
    Slurry Biodegradation.
    See 1428
BIOLOGICAL EFFECTS
    Biological Assessment of Toxicity Caused by
    Chemical Constituents Eluted from Site Soils
    Collected at the Drake Chemical Superfund
    Site, Lock Haven, Clinton Co., Pennsylvania.
    See 1491
    Evaluation of Terrestrial Indicators for Use in
    Ecological   Assessments  at   Hazardous
    Waste Sites.
    See 1249
    Health   Effects   Assessment   Summary
    Tables.
    See 1051
    Health   Effects   Assessment   Summary
    Tables.
    See 1052
    Health   Effects   Assessment   Summary
    Tables.
    See 1053
    Health Effects Assessment Summary Tables
    Fourth Quarter FY 1989.
    See 1054
    Application  of Tradescantia  Micronuoleus
    Assay for In situ Evaluation of Potential Ge-
    netic Hazards from Exposure  to Chemicals
    at a Wood-Preserving Site.
    See 1195
    Development  and   Use  of   Site-Specific
    Chemical and Biological  Criteria for  Assess-
    ing  New  Bedford  Harbor Pilot Dredging
    Project.
    See 1583
 BIOLOGICAL INDICATORS
    On-Site  Methods for Assessing Chemical
    Impact on the Soil Environment Using Earth-
    worms:  A  Case Study  at the Baird  and
    McGuire Superfund Site, Holbrook, Massa-
    chusetts.
    See 1521
 BIOLOGICAL INDUSTRIAL WASTE
 TREATMENT
    EPA SITE  Demonstration of the BioTrol Soil
    Washing Process.
    See 1502
 BIOLOGICAL MARKERS
    Evaluation of Exposure Markers.
    See 1246
 BIOLOGICAL RECOVERY
    Emerging Technologies: Bio-Recovery  Sys-
    tems  Removal and Recovery  of Metal  Ions
    from Groundwater.
    See 1439
    Emerging Technologies: Bio-Recovery  Sys-
    tems  Removal and Recovery  of Metal  Ions
    from Groundwater. Appendices.
    See 1440
 BIOLOGICAL TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE
 GROUPS
    ECO Update: The Role of BTAGs in Ecologi-
    cal Assessment. Volume 1, Number 1,  Sep-
    tember  1991.
    See 1020
 BIOLOGICAL TREATMENT
    Alternative  Biological Treatment Processes
    for Remediation of Creosote-and PCP-Con-
    taminated  Materials: Bench-Scale Treatabil-
    ity Studies.
    See 1418
    Bioremediation: An  Information Update on
    Applying Bioremediation to Site Cleanup.
    See 1421
 SU-4

-------
                                                    SUBJECT INDEX
                                                                               CERCLA
 Bioremediation in the Field. An Information
 Update on Applying Bioremediation to Site
 Clean-Up. Number 3.
 See 1422
 Bioremediation in the Field: An Information
 Update on Applying Bioremediation to Site
 Cleanup. (Number 4).
 See 1423
 Bioremediation in the Field: Number 1, No-
 vember 1990.
 See 1424
 BioTrol Soil Washing  System for Treatment
 of  a Wood  Preserving Site: Applications
 Analysis Report.
 See 1492
 Evaluation and Testing of a Protocol to De-
 termine the Aerobic Degradation Potential of
 Hazardous Waste Constituents in Soil.
 See 1503
 In-situ   Bioremediation   of  Contaminated
 Ground Water.
 See 1465
 Measurement  of Volatile   Organic  Com-
 pounds during Start-Up of Bioremediation of
 French  Limited  Superfund   Site  in  Crosby
 Texas  Using Wind  Dependent  Whole-Air
 Sampling.
 See 1414
 Bench-Scale  Evaluation of  Alternative  Bio-
 logical  Treatment Processes for the Remedi-
 ation of Pentachlorophenol- and Creosote-
 Contaminated Materials: Slurry-Phase Biore-
 mediation.
 See 1419
 Bench-Scale  Evaluation of   Alternative  Bio-
 logical  Treatment Processes for the Remedi-
 ation of  Pentachlorophenol- and Creosote-
 Contaminated Materials: Solid-Phase  Biore-
 mediation.
 See 1420
 Biodegradation of Creosote and Pentachlor-
 ophenol   in  Contaminated  Groundwater:
 Chemical and Biological Assessment.
 See 1432
 EPA Site Demonstration of  BioTrol Aqueous
 Treatment System.
 See 1441
 Extraction  of  Mercury  from Groundwater
 Using Immobilized Algae.
 See 1450
 Respirometric Methods for  Determination of
 Biodegradability and Biodegradation Kinetics
 for   Hazardous   Organic   Pollutant  Com-
 pounds.
 See 1427
 Rotating  Biological Contactors. Engineering
 Bulletin.
 See 1297
 Technology Evaluation Report: Biotrol  Soil
Washing System  for Treatment of  a  Wood
 Preserving Site. Volume 1.
 See 1539
Technology Evaluation Report: Biotrol  Soil
Washing System  for Treatment of  a  Wood
 Preserving Site. Volume 2, Part A.
 See 1540
Technology Evaluation Report: Biotrol  Soil
Washing System  for Treatment of  a  Wood
 Preserving Site. Volume 2, Part B.
See 1541
Technology Evaluation  Report:  Pilot-Scale
 Demonstration of a Slurry-Phase Biological
 Reactor  for  Creosote-Contaminated  Soil.
Volume 1.
See 1542
Technology Evaluation Report: Toronto Har-
bour Commissioners  (THC) Soil  Recycle
Treatment Train.
See 1543
 Understanding Bioremediation: A Guidebook
for Citizens.
See 0507
BIOREACTORS
    On-Site  Engineering Report of the Slurry-
    Phase  Biological  Reactor  for  Pilot-Scale
    Testing on Contaminated Soil.
    See 1520
BIOREMEDIATION
    Bioremediation in the Field: An Information
    Update on Applying Bioremediation to Site
    Cleanup. (Number 4).
    See 1423
    Bioremediation Resource Guide and Biore-
    mediation Resource Matrix.
    See 1425
    Guide for Conducting Treatability Studies
    under CERCLA: Biodegradation Remedy Se-
    lection. Interim Guidance.
    See 1159
    In situ Bioremediation of  Contaminated Un-
    saturated Subsurface Soils.
    See 1509
    Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Clean-
    up Efforts Nationwide, Spring 1993 (French
    Limited Site  Profile,  Harris  County, Texas).
    See 0954
    Use  of Office of  Research and  Develop-
    ment's  Bioremediation  Expertise in Super-
    fund Removal Program.
    See 1016
BIOTROL AQUEOUS TREATMENT SYSTEM
    EPA Site  Demonstration of BioTrol Aqueous
    Treatment System.
    See 1441
    EPA SITE Demonstration  of the BioTrol Soil
    Washing Process.
    See 1502
BIOTROL SOIL WASHERS
    BioTrol Soil Washing System for Treatment
    of a Wood   Preserving  Site:  Applications
    Analysis Report.
    See 1492
    EPA SITE Demonstration  of the BioTrol Soil
    Washing Process.
    See 1502
BIOTROL SOIL WASHING SYSTEM
    Technology  Demonstration  Summary: Bio
    Trol Soil Washing System for Treatment of a
    Wood Preserving Site.
    See 1538
    Technology Evaluation  Report:  Biotrol Soil
    Washing System for Treatment of  a Wood
    Preserving Site. Volume 1.
    See 1539
    Technology Evaluation  Report:  Biotrol Soil
    Washing System for Treatment of  a Wood
    Preserving Site. Volume 2, Part A.
    See 1540
    Technology Evaluation  Report:  Biotrol Soil
    Washing System for Treatment of  a Wood
    Preserving Site. Volume 2, Part B.
    See 1541
BIOVENTING
    Estimation of Air Impacts for Bioventing Sys-
    tems Used  at Superfund Sites. Air/Super-
    fund  National  Technical  Guidance Study
    Series.
    See 1407
BOSTON (MASSACHUSETTS)
    Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Clean-
    up  Efforts   Nationwide,   Summer  1993
    (Common Steps in  the Removal Process).
    See 0965
BOTTLE REPOSITORIES
    Decentralization of Superfund Bottle Reposi-
    tory Functions.
    See 0985
BOTTOM SEDIMENTS
    Handbook: Responding  to  Discharges  of
    Sinking Hazardous Substances.
    See 1589
BRANT (NEW YORK)
    Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Clean-
    up  Efforts  Nationwide,  Fall 1992.  (Wide
    Beach Section of Brant, New York).
    See 0948
BULLITT COUNTY (KENTUCKY)
    Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Clean-
    up Efforts Nationwide, Fall 1992. (Valley of
    the Drums, Bullitt County, Kentucky).
    See 0947
BUREAU OF RECLAMATION
    U.S. Bureau of  Reclamation Assistance to
    the Superfund Program.
    See 1138
BUSINESSES
    CERCLA  Off-Site Policy  - Eligibility of  Facili-
    ties in Assessment Monitoring.
    See 0414
CADMIUM
    Health Effects Assessment for Cadmium.
    See 1036
    Acid Volatile Sulfide Predicts the Acute Tox-
    icity of Cadmium and Nickel in Sediments.
    See 1572
CALIFORNIA
    National Priorities List Sites: California.
    See 0162
    National Priorities  List Sites: California and
    Hawaii.
    See 0163
    National Priorities  List Sites: California and
    Hawaii, 1992.
    See 0164
    Site Enforcement Tracking System  (SETS):
    PRP Listing by Site for California.
    See 0633
    Site Enforcement Tracking System  (SETS):
    PRP Listing by Site for California.
    See 0634
    Site Enforcement Tracking System  (SETS):
    PRP Listing by Site for California.
    See 0635
CANS
    Canister-Based Method for Monitoring  Toxic
    VOCs in Ambient Air.
    See 1396
CAPACITY
    CERCLA Waste Capacity Assurance.
    See 0131
CAPACITY ASSURANCE PLANS
    Guidance  for Capacity Assurance Planning.
    Capacity Planning Pursuant to CERCLA Sec-
    tion 104(c)(9).
    See 0137
CARBON TETRACHLORIDE
    Health Effects Assessment for  Carbon Tet-
    rachloride.
    See 1037
CARVER-GREENFIELD PROCESS
    Carver-Greenfield  Process (Trade  Name)
    Dehydro-Tech   Corporation.   Applications
    Analysis Report.
    See 1207
CASE STUDIES
    Procedural Guidance on  Treatment of  Insur-
    ers under  CERCLA.
    See 0589
CASHOUT SETTLEMENTS
    Interim Cashout Settlement Procedures.
    See 0558
CERCLA
    CERCLA/Superfund Orientation  Manual.
    See 0130
                                                                                                                           SU-5

-------
CERCLA (COMPREHENSIVE ENVIRONMENTAL
RESPONSE COMPENSATION AND LIABILITY ACT)
    ('.'Lit  '!'  '    ":•  '''.T.H '  • .L
                                                       SUBJECT INDEX
CERCLA (COMPREHENSIVE
ENVIRONMENTAL RESPONSE
COMPENSATION AND LIABILITY ACT)
    CERCLIS Characterization Project: Region 1
    Results,
    See 0002
    CERCLIS Characterization Project: Region 2
    Results.
    See 0003
CERCLA INFORMATION SYSTEM (CERCLIS)
    CERCLIS Characterization Project: National
    Results,
    Sea 0001
    CERCLIS Characterization Project Region 3
    Results,
    Sao 0004
    CERCLIS Characterization Project: Region 4
    Results.
    SooOOOS
    CERCLIS Characterization Project: Region 5
    Results.
    Sea 0006
    QERCLIS Characterization Project: Region 6
    Results.
    See 0007
    CERCLIS Characterization Project Region 7
    Results,
    SoaOOOS
    OERCLIS Characterization Project Region 8
    Results.
    See 0009
    CERCLIS Characterization Project: Region 9
    Rosuils.
    Sea 0010
    CERCLIS Characterization Project Region
    10 Results.
    See 0011
CERCLIS (CERCLA INFORMATION SYSTEM)
    CERCLIS Characterization Project Region 1
    Results,
    Sea 0002
    CERCLIS Characterization Project: Region 2
    Results.
    Sea 0003
CHEMFIX PROCESS
    Chemflx Technologies,  Inc. Solidification/
    Stabilization  Process. Application Analysis
    See 1551
    SJTE, Demonstration of the CHEMFIX Solidi-
    (icafon/Stabilization Process at the Portable
    Equipment Salvage Company Site.
    Soe 1559
    Technology  Evaluation  Report  CHEMFIX
    Technologies,  Inc.,  Solidification/Stabiliza-
    tion Process, Clackamas, Oregon. Volume 2.
    Soo 1339
    Technology  Evaluation  Report:  Chemfix
    Technologies, Inc. Solidification/Stabilization
    Process, Clackamas, Oregon. Volume 1.
    See 1566
 CHEMICAL ANALYSIS
    Assessment of Tentatively Identified  Com-
    pounds in Superfund Samples.
    Sea 1199
    Chemical Dehalogenation  Treatability Stud-
    ies under CERCLA: An Overview.
    See 1153
    Etivlfonmental    Asbestos    Assessment
    Manual. Superfund Method for the Determi-
    nation of Asbestos In Ambient Air. Part 2.
    .Technical Background Document.
    See 1028
    International Symposium on Reid Screening
    Methods for Hazardous Wastes  and Toxic
    'Chemicals (2nd), Proceedings. Held in  Las
    Vegas, Nevada on February 12-14, 1991.
    Sea 1279
    Evaluation of Modifications to Extraction Pro-
    cedures Used  in Analysis of Environmental
    Samples from Superfund Sites.
    See 1247
    Technology  Evaluation  Report: SITE  Pro-
    gram.  CF  Systems Organics  Extraction
    System,   New  Bedford,  Massachusetts.
    Volume 2.
    See 1347
    Toxicity Bioassay and Eluate Heavy Metals
    Analysis Results of the Bench Scale Stabili-
    zation  Study  of  Soils  from  the  United
    Chrome Superfund  NPL  (National  Priority
    List) Site Corvallis, Oregon.
    See 1546
    USEPA Contract Laboratory Program Nation-
    al  Functional  Guidelines for Organic Data
    Review.
    See 0077
    User's Guide to the Contract Laboratory Pro-
    gram.
    See 0079
CHEMICAL COMPOUNDS
    Biological Assessment of Toxicity Caused by
    Chemical Constituents Eluted from Site Soils
    Collected at the Drake Chemical Superfund
    Site, Lock Haven, Clinton Co., Pennsylvania.
    See 1491
    Health   Effects   Assessment  Summary
    Tables.
    See 1051
    Health   Effects   Assessment  Summary
    Tables.
    See 1052
    Health   Effects   Assessment  Summary
    Tables.
    See 1053
    Health Effects Assessment Summary Tables
    Fourth Quarter FY 1989.
    See 1054
    Limited-Use Chemical Protective Clothing for
    EPA Superfund Activities.
    See 1058
    Estimation  of  the Cost of Using  Chemical
    Protective Clothing.
    See 1244
    On-Site Methods for  Assessing  Chemical
    Impact on the  Soil Environment Using Earth-
    worms: A  Case  Study  at the Baird  and
    McGuire Superfund Site,  Holbrook, Massa-
    chusetts.
    See 1521
CHEMICAL LABORATORIES
    Guidelines for the Cleanup of Clandestine
    Drug Laboratories.
    See 1007
CHEMICAL PROPERTIES
    Superfund Fact Sheet: Arsenic.
    See 0488
CHEMICAL SPILLS
    Treatment of Nonhazardous Petroleum-Con-
    taminated   Soils  by  Thermal Desorption
    Technologies.
    See 1547
CHEMICAL STABILIZATION
    Evaluation of Waste Stabilized by the Solidi-
    tech SITE Technology.
    See 1554
    Soliditech,  Inc.   Solidification/Stabilization
    Process: Applications Analysis Report.
    See 1562
    Technology  Evaluation  Report  CHEMFIX
    Technologies,  Inc.,  Solidification/Stabiliza-
    tion Process, Clackamas, Oregon. Volume 2.
    See 1339
    Technology   Evaluation  Report:   Chemfix
    technologies, Inc. Solidification/Stabilization
    Process, Clackamas, Oregon. Volume 1.
    See 1566
CHEMICAL TREATMENT
    Chemical Dehalogenation Treatment: APEG
    Treatment.
    See 1210
    Chemical Oxidation Treatment.  Engineering
    Bulletin.
    See 1211
    Developments in Chemical  Treatment .of
    Contaminated Soil.
    See 1499
    Guide for  Conducting  Treatability Studies
    under CERCLA: Chemical Dehalogenation.
    See 1161
    Technology Evaluation Report: Toronto Har-
    bour Commissioners  (THC)  Soil  Recycle
    Treatment Train.
    See 1543
CHEMICAL WASTE SITES
    Application of a  Plant Test System in the
    Identification of Potential Genetic Hazards at
    Chemical Waste Sites.
    See 1194
CHEMICAL WASTES
    Chemical    Waste    Management,    Inc.
    PO*WW*ER  (Trade   Name)  Evaporation-
    Catalytic Oxidation Technology.  Technology
    Evaluation Report. Volume 1.
    See 1213
    Chemical    Waste    Management,    Inc.
    PO*WW*ER  (Trade   Name)  Evaporation-
    Catalytic Oxidation Technology.  Technology
    Evalution Report. Volume 2.
    See 1214
CHEMICAL WATER POLLUTANTS
    Superfund Innovative  Technology Evaluation
    Program Demonstration  Plan for Westing-
    house  Bio-Analytic   Systems Pentachloro-
    phenol Immunoassays.
    See 1310
CHLORDANE
    Health Effects Assessment for Chlordane.
    See 1038
CHLORINE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS
    Guidance on Remedial Actions for Super-
    fund Sites with PCB Contamination.
    See 1260
CHLOROBENZENES
    Health Effects Assessment for Chloroben-
    zene.
    See 1039
CHLOROFORM
    Health Effects Assessment for Chloroform.
    See 1040
CHLOROMETHANES
    Health Effects Assessment  for  Methylene
    Chloride.
    See 1043
CHROMATOGRAPHIC ANALYSIS
    Evaluation of Commercially-Available Porta-
    ble Gas Chromatographs.
    See 1478
CHROMIUM
    Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Clean-
    up Efforts Nationwide, Spring 1993 (United
    Chrome Products Site Profile).
    See 0961
    Toxicity Bioassay and Eluate Heavy Metals
    Analysis Results of the Bench Scale Stabili-
    zation Study of  Soils  from  the  United
    Chrome Superfund  NPL  (National  Priority
    List) Site Corvallis, Oregon.
    See 1546
 SU-6

-------
                                                           SUBJECT INDEX
                                                                                                                                 CLEANUP
 CHROMIUM PLATING
     Use  of   'Selenastrum  capricornutum'  to
     Assess the Toxicity Potential of Surface and
     Ground Water Contamination  Caused  by
     Chromium Waste.
     See 1367
 CIRCULATING BED COMBUSTOR
     Technology Evaluation Report: Ogden Circu-
     lating  Bed Combustor at the  McColl Super-
     fund Site.
     See 1344
 CITIZEN PARTICIPATION
     Citizens' Guidance Manual for the Technical
     Assistance Grant Program.
     See 0463
     Community Relations: Use of Senior  Envi-
     ronmental  Employees in Superfund (Super-
     fund Management Review:  Recommendation
     43.K.L).
     See 0088
     Proposed Method to  Evaluate the Effective-
     ness of Community  Involvement in  Super-
     fund (Superfund Management Review:  Rec-
     ommendation Number 43.A).
     See 0109
     Role of Community Interviews in the Devel-
     opment of a Community Relations Program
     for Remedial Response.
     See 0485
     Superfund  Fact Sheet: Public Involvement.
     See 0493
     Superfund:  Report of the EPA  Superfund
     Revitalization Public Meeting Held on June
     24,1992. Volumes 1 and 2.
     See 0333
 CLACKAMAS (OREGON)
     Superfund Innovative Technology Evaluation
     Technology Demonstration Summary: Chem-
     fix Solidification/Stabilization Process, Clack-
     amas, Oregon.
     See 1564
CLEAN UP
     Furthering the Use of Innovative Treatment
     Technologies in OSWER Programs.
     See 1256
CLEAN-UP OPERATIONS
     Terra Vac In situ Vacuum Extraction System:
    Applications Analysis Report.
     See 1356
CLEANING
    Specifications  and  Guidance  for Contami-
    nant-Free Sample Containers.
    See 0994
CLEANUP
    Bioremediation in the  Field: An Information
    Update  on  Applying Bioremediation to  Site
    Cleanup. (Number 4).
    See 1423
    Cleanup Information Bulletin Board System
    Users Guide. (CLU-IN: Cleanup Information
    Bulletin Board).
    See 1215
    Conducting  Non-Time-Critical  Removal  Ac-
    tions under CERCLA.
    See 0999
    Covenants Not to Sue under SARA.
    See 0526
    Determining  Soil  Response Action  Levels
    Based on Potential Contaminant Migration to
    Ground Water: A Compendium of Examples.
    See 1497
    Emergency   Response  Cleanup  Services
    Contracts (ERGS). Users Manual.
    See 0024
    Homeowners  Exempted  from  Superfund
    Cleanup Costs: National Policy Overview.
    See 0426
  National Priorities List Sites: Alabama.
  See 0148
  National Priorities List Sites: Alabama.
  See 0149
  National Priorities List Sites: Alabama, 1992.
  See 0150
  National Priorities List Sites: Alaska.
  See 0151
  National Priorities List Sites: Alaska.
  See 0152
  National Priorities  List Sites: Alaska, 1992.
  See 0153
  National  Priorities   List  Sites:  American
  Samoa, Guam, and the Trust Territories.
  See 0154
  National  Priorities   List  Sites:  American
  Samoa, Guam and Trust Territories.
  See 0155
  National Priorities  List  Sites: Arizona and
  Nevada.
  See 0156
  National Priorities  List  Sites: Arizona and
  Nevada.
  See 0157
  National Priorities  List  Sites: Arizona and
  Nevada, 1992.
  See 0158
  National Priorities List Sites: Arkansas.
  See 0159
  National Priorities List Sites: Arkansas.
  See 0160
  National Priorities List Sites: Arkansas, 1992.
 See 0161
  National Priorities List Sites: California.
 See 0162
  National  Priorities List Sites:  California and
 Hawaii.
 See 0163
 National  Priorities List Sites:  California and
 Hawaii, 1992.
 See 0164
 National Priorities List Sites: Colorado.
 See 0165
 National Priorities List Sites: Colorado.
 See 0166
 National Priorities List Sites: Colorado, 1992.
 See 0167
 National Priorities List Sites: Connecticut.
 See 0168
 National Priorities List Sites: Connecticut.
 See 0169
 National  Priorities List Sites:  Connecticut,
 1992.
 See 0170
 National Priorities List Sites: Delaware.
 See 0171
 National Priorities List Sites: Delaware.
 See 0172
 National Priorities List Sites: Delaware, 1992.
 See 0173
 National Priorities List Sites: Florida.
 See 0174
 National Priorities List Sites: Florida.
 See 0175
 National Priorities List Sites: Florida,  1992.
 See 0176
 National Priorities List Sites: Georgia.
 See 0177
 National Priorities List Sites: Georgia.
 See 0178
 National Priorities List Sites: Georgia,  1992.
 See 0179
 National Priorities List Sites: Hawaii.
 See 0180
 National Priorities List  Sites: Idaho.
 See 0181
 National Priorities List Sites: Idaho.
See 0182
National Priorities List Sites: Idaho, 1992.
See 0183
  National Priorities List Sites: Illinois.
  See 0184
  National Priorities List Sites: Illinois.
  See 0185
  National Priorities List Sites:  Illinois,  1992.
  See 0186
  National Priorities List Sites: Indiana.
  See 0187
  National Priorities List Sites: Indiana.
  See 0188
  National Priorities  List Sites:  Indiana,  1992.
  See 0189
  National Priorities List Sites: Iowa.
  See 0190
  National Priorities List Sites: Iowa.
  See 0191
  National Priorities List Sites: Iowa, 1992.
  See 0192
  National Priorities List Sites: Kansas.
  See 0193
  National Priorities List Sites: Kansas.
  See 0194
  National Priorities List Sites: Kansas,  1992.
  See 0195
  National Priorities List Sites: Kentucky.
  See 0196
  National Priorities List Sites: Kentucky.
  See 0197
  National Priorities List Sites: Kentucky,  1992.
 See 0198
  National Priorities List Sites: Louisiana.
 See 0199
 National Priorities List Sites: Louisiana.
 See 0200
 National Priorities List Sites: Louisiana,  1992.
 See 0201
 National Priorities List Sites: Maine.
 See 0202
 National Priorities List Sites: Maine.
 See 0203
 National  Priorities List Sites:  Maine, 1992.
 See 0204
 National Priorities List Sites: Maryland.
 See 0205
 National Priorities List Sites: Maryland.
 See 0206
 National Priorities List Sites: Maryland, 1992.
 See 0207
 National Priorities List Sites: Massachusetts.
 See 0208
 National Priorities List Sites: Massachusetts.
 See 0209
 National Priorities List Sites: Massachusetts,
 1992.
 See 0210
 National Priorities List Sites: Michigan.
 See 0211
 National Priorities List Sites: Michigan.
 See 0212
 National Priorities List Sites: Michigan, 1992.
 See 0213
 National Priorities List Sites: Minnesota.
 See 0214
 National Priorities List Sites: Minnesota.
 See 0215
 National  Priorities  List  Sites:  Minnesota,
 1992.
 See 0216
 National Priorities List Sites: Mississippi.
 See 0217
 National Priorities List Sites: Mississippi.
 See 0218
 National  Priorities  List Sites:  Mississippi,
 1992.
See 0219
National Priorities List Sites: Missouri.
See 0220
National Priorities List Sites: Missouri.
See 0221
                                                                                                                                   SU-7

-------
           CLEANUP
                                                                      SUBJECT INDEX
               National Priorities Ust Sites: Missouri, 1992.
               Sea 0222
               National Priorities Ust Sites: Montana.
               Sea 0223
               National Priorities List Sites: Montana.
               Sea 0224
               National Priorities Ust Sites: Montana, 1992.
               Sea 0225
               National Priorities Ust Sites: Nebraska.
               Sea 0226
               National Priorities Ust Sites: Nebraska.
               Sea 0227
               National  Priorities,  List  Sites:  Nebraska,
               '^992,
               See 0228
               .National Priorities  Ust Sites:  New Hamp-
               shire,
               Sea 0229
                National Priorities  List Sites:  New Hamp-
                shire.
                See 0230
                National Priorities  Ust Sites:  New Hamp-
                shire, 1992.
                Sea 0231
                National Priorities Ust Sites: New Jersey.
                See 0232
                National Priorities Ust Sites: New Jersey.
               "Sa«0233  	
                National  Priorities  Ust Sites:  New Jersey,
                1992.
                See 0234
                National Priorities  Ust_Sites:  New Mexico.
                See 0235
                National  Priorities  Ust Sites:  New Mexico.
                See 0236
                National  Priorities  Ust Sites:  New Mexico,
                1992,
                Sea 023?
                National Priorities Ust Sites: New York.
                Sea 0238
                National Priorities Ust Sites: New York.
                See 0239
                National  Priorities  Ust  Sites: New  York,
               L.1.882.
                See 0240       	
               	National  Priorities  Ust  Sites:  North  and
                South Dakota.
                Sea 0241
                National  Priorities  Ust  Sites:  North  and
                South Dakota, 1992.
                See 0242
                National Priorities List Sites: North Carolina.
                Sea 0243
                National Priorities Ust Sites: North Carolina.
                See 0244
                National Priorities Ust Sites: North Carolina,
                1992.
                See 0245
                National Priorities Ust Sites:  North Dakota
               ! and South Dakota!
                See 0246
                National Priorities Ust Sites: Ohio.
                Sea 0247
                National Priorities Ust Sites: Ohio.
                See 0248
                National Priorities List Sites: Ohio,  1992.
               "Sod 0249
                National Priorities List Sites: Oklahoma.
                Sea 0250
                 National Priorities Ust Sites: Oklahoma.
                Sea 0251
                 National  Priorities  Ust  Sites:  Oklahoma,
                 1992,
                 Sea 0252
                , National Priorities Ust Sites: Oregon.
                 See 0253
                 National Priorities Ust Sites: Oregon.
                 SOT 0254
                 National  Priorities Ust Sites:  Oregon,  1992.
                 See 0255


             SU-8
National  Priorities  Ust Sites: Pennsylvania.
See 0256
National  Priorities  List Sites: Pennsylvania.
See 0257
National  Priorities  List Sites: Pennsylvania,
1992.
See 0258
National Priorities List Sites: Puerto Rico.
See 0259
National Priorities List Sites: Puerto Rico.
See 0260
National Priorities List Sites: Puerto Rico and
Virgin Islands, 1992.
See 0261
National  Priorities  List Sites: Rhode Island.
See 0262
National  Priorities  List Sites: Rhode Island.
See 0263
National  Priorities  List Sites: Rhode Island,
1992.
See 0264
National  Priorities List Sites: South Carolina.
See 0266
National  Priorities List Sites: South Carolina.
See 0267
National  Priorities List Sites: South Carolina,
1992.
See 0268
National  Priorities List Sites: Tennessee.
See 0269
National Priorities Ust Sites: Tennessee.
See 0270
National  Priorities  Ust  Sites:  Tennessee,
1992.
See 0271
National Priorities List Sites: Texas.
See 0272
National Priorities List Sites: Texas.
See 0273
National Priorities List Sites: Texas,  1992.
See 0274
 National  Priorities List  Sites:  The  United
States Territories,  1992.
See 0275
 National Priorities List Sites: Utah.
 See 0276
 National Priorities List Sites: Utah.
 See 0277
 National Priorities  List Sites: Utah, 1992.
 See 0278
 National Priorities  List Sites: Vermont.
 See 0279
 National Priorities  List Sites: Vermont.
 See 0280
 National Priorities List Sites: Vermont, 1992.
 See 0281
 National Priorities List Sites: Virginia.
 See 0282
 National Priorities List Sites: Virginia.
 See 0283
 National Priorities List Sites: Virginia, 1992.
 See 0284
 National Priorities Ust Sites: Washington.
 See 0285
 National Priorities List Sites: Washington.
 See 0286
 National  Priorities  Ust Sites:  Washington,
 1992.
 See 0287
 National Priorities Ust Sites: West Virginia.
 See 0288
 National Priorities List Sites: West Virginia.
 See 0289
 National Priorities Ust Sites: West Virginia,
 1992.
 See 0290
 National Priorities List Sites: Wisconsin.
 See 0291
 National Priorities List Sites: Wisconsin.
 See 0292
National' Priorities  List  Sites:  Wisconsin,
1992.
See 0293
National Priorities List Sites: Wyoming.
See 0294
National Priorities List Sites: Wyoming.
See 0295
National Priorities List Sites: Wyoming,  1992.
See 0296
Political Subdivision  Involvement in Super-
fund.
See 0480
Presentations   EPA-State  Soil   Standards
Conference. Held in  Crystal City, Virginia on
January 29,1991.
See 1524
Factors Affecting the Applicability of Plasma
Systems to the Cleanup of Superfund  Sites.
See 1250
Superfund   Accelerated  Cleanup   Model
(SACM).
See 0119
Superfund
                                   Model
| iillll	I*...	|iili||i::i  .ijni,,
                                             ...... :, v , i Hi! ........ i iiii, unB ...... limn L  ;,ii: ;,; ; 1,5.; ; ..... •
                                                                            i. iim ....... ,„ ...... m,; .................... . ,1 „ lijiiiiiiiii,. liijiiaiiii .iiiiinHiiii, ,15 iaiiiiyiii!, ,i
__,	   Accelerated   Cleanup
(SACM) Coordination Strategy.
See 0120
Superfund and Small Waste Contributors.
See 0881
Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Clean-
up Efforts Nationwide, Fall 1993 (Bunker Hill
Site  Profile, Silver Valley,  Northern Idaho).
See 0951
Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Clean-
up  Efforts  Nationwide, Fall  1993  (Johns-
Manville Site Profile, Illinois).
See 0952
Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Clean-
up Efforts Nationwide, Summer 1993 (Army
Creek Landfill Site Profile,  New Castle, Dela-
ware).
See 0962
Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Clean-
up Efforts Nationwide, Summer 1993 (Chis-
man Creek  Site Profile, York County, Virgin-
ia).
See 0963
Superfund at Work:  Hazardous Waste Clean-
up  Efforts   Nationwide,  Summer   1993
(Common Steps in  the Removal  Process).
See 0965
Superfund at Work:  Hazardous Waste Clean-
up Efforts  Nationwide, Summer 1993 (East-
ern Diversified  Metals Site Profile, Schuylkill
County, Pennsylvania).
See 0966
Superfund at Work:  Hazardous Waste Clean-
up Efforts  Nationwide, Summer 1993 (Fike/
Artel Chemical Site  Profile, Nitro,  West Vir-
ginia).
See 0967
Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Clean-
up Efforts Nationwide, Summer 1993 (North-
side Landfill Site Profile,  Spokane, Washing-
ton).
See 0968
Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Clean-
 up Efforts Nationwide, Summer 1993 (Rogue
Valley/Ditch  Creek  Ranch  Site  Profile,
Wimer, Oregon).
 See 0969
 Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Clean-
 up Efforts Nationwide, Winter 1993. (Wells G
 and H Site, Woburn, Massachusetts).
 See 0972
 Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Clean-
 up Efforts  Nationwide, Winter  1994 (Bailey
 Waste Disposal Site Profile, Texas).
 See 0973
                                                                                                                liiniiifa,;,ii II-,!|	Iiii I liJId ;iiliii,! ij!,ij, ihlil.„Hi	imillliliil ,il 1	K . i1 ZMiii, II	iij; ..ii'iiiBI!!.:	liiiilill. .iiiil' III

-------
                                                        SUBJECT INDEX
                                                                                                            COMMUNITY RELATIONS
    Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Clean-
    up  Efforts  Nationwide,  Winter  1994 (Sey-
    mour Recycling Site Profile, Seymour, Indi-
    ana).
    See 0975
    SUPERFUND:  Focusing  on the Nation at
    Large. A Decade of Progress  at  National
    Priorities List Sites.
    See 0321
    Superfund: Focusing  on the Nation at Large.
    A Decade of Progress at National  Priorities
    List Sites.
    See 0322
    Superfund Strategic  Plan and Implementa-
    tion Strategy Fiscal Year 1994.
    See 0126
    Superfund Strategic  Plan and Implementa-
    tion Strategy Fiscal Year 1994: Office and
    Division Plans.
    See 0127
CLEANUP OPERATIONS
    Accessing Federal Data Bases for Contami-
    nated Site Clean-Up  Technologies  (Second
    Edition).
    See 1189
    Assessing Sites under SACM: Interim Guid-
    ance. Volume  1,  Number 4,  Deccember
    1992.
    See 0084
    Bioremediation: An Information  Update on
    Applying Bioremediation to Site Cleanup
    See 1421
    Bioremediation  in the Field. An  Information
    Update on Applying  Bioremediation to Site
    Clean-Up. Number 3.
    See 1422
    Commencement  Bay  Nearshore/Tideflats
    Feasibility Study. Development of Sediment
    Cleanup Goals.
    See 1578
    Commencement  Bay  Nearshore/Tideflats
    Feasibility Study. Executive Summary.
    See 1579
    Commencement  Bay  Nearshore/Tideflats
    Feasibility Study. Volume 1.
    See 1580
    Commencement Bay  Nearshore/Tideflats
    Feasibility Study. Volume 2. Appendices.
    See 1581
    Community Relations  in Superfund: A Hand-
    book.
    See 0467
    Early Action and Long-Term Action under
    SACM: Interim Guidance, Volume 1, Number
    2, December 1992.
    See 0089
    ECO  Update. Volume 1, Number  3. The
    Role  of Natural  Resource Trustees in the
   Superfund Process.
   See  1021
   ECO Update. Volume 1, Number 4. Develop-
   ing  a Work  Scope for Ecological Assess-
   ments.
   See 1022
   Enhancing   State Superfund  Capabilities:
   Nine-State Study.
   See 0471
   Evaluation of Ground-Water Extraction Rem-
   edies: Phase 2. Volume 1.  Summary Report.
   See 1444
   Evaluation of Ground-Water Extraction Rem-
   edies: Phase 2. Volume 2. Case Studies and
   Updates.
   See 1445
   Exxon  Valdez Oil Spill.  A Report  to the
   President.
   See 0928
   Framework for Real-Time  Decision-Making:
   New  Bedford Harbor  Pilot Dredging Study.
   See 1587
  Guidance on EPA Oversight of Remedial De-
  signs and  Remedial Actions Performed by
  Potentially Responsible Parties.
  See 1128
  Harmonization of QA Procedures  for Envi-
  ronmental Data Operations: Development of
  a National  Consensus Standard for Quality
  Assurance for Environmental Programs.
  See 0989
  In-situ  Stabilization/Solidification  of  PCB
  (Polychlorinated    Biphenyls)-Contaminated
  Soil.
  See 1556
  Description of EPA SITE Demonstration of
  the  HAZCON  Stabilization Process at the
  Douglassville, Pennsylvania Superfund Site.
  See 1552
  Evaluating  the  Effectiveness  of  Ground
  Water Extraction Systems.
  See 1443
  SACM Regional  Decision Teams: Interim
  Guidance. Volume  1, Number  5, December
  1992.
  See 0111
  Status of Key SACM Program  Management
  Issues: Interim Guidance, Volume 1, Number
  1, December 1992.
  See 0113
  Superfund  Accelerated  Cleanup  Bulletin:
  Presumptive Remedies for Wood Treatment
  Facilities. Volume  1, Number 2,  May 1992.
 See 0116
 Superfund  Accelerated  Cleanup  Bulletin.
 Volume  1,  Number 3. Presumptive Reme-
 dies.
 See 0118
 Superfund  Accelerated   Cleanup   Model
 (SACM). Volume 1, Number 4,  November
 1992.
 See 0122
 Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Clean-
 up Efforts Nationwide, Fall  1992. (American
 Thermostat Corporation, New York).
 See 0942
 Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Clean-
 up Efforts Nationwide, Fall 1992. (Ciba-Geigy
 Corporation, Mclntosh, Alabama).
 See 0944
 Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Clean-
 up Efforts Nationwide, Fall 1992. (Krysowaty
 Farm, Hillsborough, New Jersey).
 See 0945
 Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Clean-
 up Efforts Nationwide, Fall  1992. (Valley of
 the Drums, Bullitt County, Kentucky).
 See 0947
 Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Clean-
 up  Efforts  Nationwide,  Fall 1992. (Wide
 Beach Section of Brant, New York).
 See 0948
 Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Clean-
 up Efforts Nationwide, Spring 1993  (French
 Limited Site Profile, Harris  County,  Texas).
 See 0954
 Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Clean-
 up Efforts Nationwide, Spring 1993 (Old Mid-
 land Products Site Profile, Yell  County, Ar-
 kansas).
 See 0957
 Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Clean-
 up Efforts Nationwide, Spring 1993  (United
 Chrome Products Site Profile).
 See 0961
 Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Clean-
 up Efforts Nationwide,  Summer 1993 (Tri-
 State Plating Site  Profile, Columbus,  Indi-
 ana).
 See 0970
 Superfund Emergency Response Actions: A
Summary  of Federally Funded  Removals.
Volume 3.
See 0318
     Superfund Innovative Technology Evaluation
     Program: Technology Profiles,  Fourth  Edi-
     tion.
     See 1316
     Superfund:  Report of  the  EPA Superfund
     Revitalization  Public Meeting Held on  June
     24, 1992. Volumes 1 and 2.
     See 0333
     Technology Evaluation  Report: SITE  Pro-
     gram.  CF  Systems  Organics  Extraction
     System,  New   Bedford,  Massachusetts.
     Volume 1.
     See 1346
 CLEANUP TIME
     Cleaning Up the Nation's Waste Sites:  Mar-
     kets and Technology Trends.
     See 0132
 COLLECTING METHODS
     In-situ  Stabilization/Solidification  of  PCB
     (Polychlorinated    Biphenyls)-Contaminated
     Soil.
     See 1556

 COLORADO
     National Priorities List Sites: Colorado.
     See 0165
     National Priorities List Sites: Colorado.
     See 0166
     National Priorities List Sites:  Colorado, 1992.
     See 0167
     Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
     PRP Listing by Site for Colorado.
     See 0636
     Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
     PRP Listing by Site for Colorado.
     See 0637
     Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
     PRP Listing by Site for Colorado.
     See 0638
 COMBUSTION EFFICIENCY
     Control  of  Transient Incinerator Emissions
     with an  Oxygen Based Combustion System.
     See 1401
     Retech, Inc.,  Plasma  Centrifugal Furnace:
     Applications Analysis Report.
     See 1295
 COMBUSTION PRODUCTS
     Comparison of Organic Emissions from Haz-
     ardous Waste Incinerators versus the 1990
     Toxic Release Inventory Air Releases.
     See 1397
 COMMENCEMENT BAY
    Commencement  Bay  Nearshore/Tideflats
     Feasibility Study.  Development of Sediment
    Cleanup Goals.
    See 1578
    Commencement  Bay  Nearshore/Tideflats
    Feasibility Study. Executive Summary.
    See 1579
    Commencement  Bay  Nearshore/Tideflats
    Feasibility Study. Volume 1.
    See 1580
    Commencement  Bay  Nearshore/Tideflats
    Feasibility Study. Volume 2. Appendices.
    See 1581
COMMUNITY RELATIONS
    Community  Relations during Enforcement
    Activities and Development of the Adminis-
    trative Record.
    See 0465
    Community Relations in Superfund: A Hand-
    book.
    See 0467
                                                                                                                              SU-9

-------
COMPREHENSIVE EMERGENCY RESPONSE
CLEAN-UP AND LIABILITY ACT (CERCLA)

    Community Relations: Use of Senior Envi-
   jrpnmental Employees In Superfund (Super-
    tuna Management Review:  Recommendation
    43.K.L).
    S««0088
   ; Gutda  to  Community Involvement for Site
   '", Assessment Managers.
    Sea 0476
   (Mandatory Community  Relations Training.
   ; Suparfund Management Review Implementa-
   ' fon Product (Recommendation: No. 43.P(i)).
    S«e 0103
   • planning for Sufficient Community Relations
   ! (Superfund Management Review: No. 43A),
   J"Se«0108
   ii| .proposed  MaUxxTio Evaluate the Effective-
   jf'nass o) Community Involvement in  Super-
   !,"tund (Superfund Management Review: Rec-
    ommendation Number 43.A).
    See 0109
    Role ol Community Interviews in  the Devel-
    opment of a  Community Relations Program
    (or Remedial Response.
    Sea 0485
   :Superfund Responsiveness Summaries (Su-
   " perfund Management Review: Recommen-
   , datkm Number 43E).
    Sea 0125
    Using  State and Local Officials to Assist in
    Community Relations (Superfund Manage-
   ' rinent Review: Recommendation No. 43.K.L).
    Soe0128
COMPREHENSIVE EMERGENCY RESPONSE
CLEAN-UP AND LIABILITY ACT (CERCLA)
    inorganic   Contract  Compliance  Screening
   ji System (ICCSS) Software  (for Microcomput-
   	etsl          	
    See 0034
   ii Inorganic  Contract  Compliance  Screening
    System (tCCSS) Software for the PC  (Ver-
    sion 3/90) User Manual.
    Sea 0035
    Organic  Contract   Compliance  Screening
   | System (OCCSS) Software  (for  Microcom-
   I'putdrs),       	
    Sea 0047
   	Organic  Contract   Compliance  Screening
    System (OCCSS) Software for the PC (Ver-
    sion 2/90) User Manual.
    See 0048
 COMPREHENSIVE ENVIRONMENT RESPONSE
 COMPENSATION AND LIABILITY ACT
    Redelegation of Cfvit Judicial Settlement Au-
    thorities under Delegation 14-13-B and 14-
    14-E.
    See 0593
    Revision  of  CERCLA Civil  Judicial Settle-
    ment  Authorities under Delegations  14-13-B
    and 14-14-E.
    See 0602
    Waiver of Concurrence on Da Minimis Gen-
    erator Settlements.
    See 0892
 COMPREHENSIVE ENVIRONMENTAL
 RESPONSE
    Evaluating Mixed Funding Settlements under
    CEHOA
    Se«0537
    Notification of Hazardous Waste Sites Re-
    quired Under Section 103(c) of the Compre-
   ;, hensfve Environmental  Response, Compen-
   l-i-satton and Uablly Act (CERCLA) of 1980:
    EPA Region 1.
    Soe 1174
   "'Notification of 'Hazardous Waste Sites Re-
   » quired Under Section 103(c) of the Compre-
    hensive Environmental  Response,  Compen-
   	satlbn and Liability Act (CERCLA) of 1980:
     EPA Region 2.
     S*«1175
         SUBJECT INDEX
   Notification of Hazardous Waste Sites Re-
   quired Under Section  103(c) of the Compre-
   hensive Environmental Response, Compen-
   sation and Liability Act (CERCLA) of 1980:
   EPA Region 3.
   See 1176
   Notification of Hazardous Waste Sites Re-
   quired Under Section  103(c) of the Compre-
   hensive Environmental Response, Compen-
   sation and Liability Act (CERCLA) of 1980:
   EPA Region 4.
   See 1177
   Notification of Hazardous Waste Sites Re-
   quired Under Section  103(c) of the Compre-
   hensive Environmental Response, Compen-
   sation and Liability Act (CERCLA) of 1980:
   EPA Region 5.
   See 1178
   Notification of Hazardous Waste Sites Re-
   quired Under Section  103(c) of the Compre-
   hensive Environmental Response, Compen-
   sation and Liability Act (CERCLA) of 1980:
   EPA Region 6.
   See 1179
   Notification  of Hazardous Waste Sites Re-
   quired Under Section  103(c) of the Compre-
   hensive Environmental Response, Compen-
   sation and Liability Act (CERCLA) of 1980:
   EPA Region 7.
   See 1180
   Notification  of Hazardous Waste Sites Re-
   quired Under Section  103(c) of the Compre-
   hensive Environmental Response, Compen-
   sation and Liability Act (CERCLA) of 1980:
   EPA Region 8.
   See 1181
   Notification  of Hazardous Waste Sites Re-
   quired Under Section 103(c) of the Compre-
   hensive Environmental Response, Compen-
   sation and Liability Act (CERCLA) of 1980:
   EPA Region 9.
   See 1182
   Notification  of Hazardous Waste  Sites Re-
   quired Under Section 103(c) of the Compre-
   hensive  Environmental  Response, Compen-
   sation and  Liability Act (CERCLA) of 1980:
   EPA Region 10.
   See 1183
   Superfund Progress  - Aficionado's  Version
   (Progress as of March 31, 1992).
   See 0326
COMPREHENSIVE ENVIRONMENTAL
RESPONSE COMPENSATION AND
LIABILITIES ACT (CERCLA)
   Superfund Policy Forum Update, Volume 1,
   Number 1, February 1992.
   See 0324
COMPREHENSIVE ENVIRONMENTAL
RESPONSE COMPENSATION AND LIABILITY
ACT
   Assessing Reports of Continuous Releases
   of Hazardous Substances: A  Guide  for EPA
    Regions.
    See 1142
    CERCLA  Compliance  with  Other  Laws
    Manual: Overview of ARARs - Focus  on
    ARAR Waivers.
    See 0408
    CERCLA Compliance with the RCRA Toxici-
    ty Characteristics (TC) Rule: Part 2.
    See 0412
    Exemptions from the Statutory Limits on Re-
    moval Actions.
    See 1002
    Guide for  Conducting  Treatability  Studies
    under CERCLA.
    See 1154
    Guide for  Conducting  Treatability  Studies
    under CERCLA: Soil Washing. Interim Guid-
    ance.
    See 1165
    Guide  for Conducting Treatability  Studies
    under CERCLA: Soil Washing: Quick Refer-
    ence Fact Sheet.
    See 1166
    Political Subdivision  Involvement  in  Super-
    fund.
    See 0480
    Reporting Requirements for Continuous Re-
    leases of Hazardous  Substances: A Guide
    for Facilities and Vessels on Compliance.
    See 1150
    Streamlining the RI/FS for CERCLA Munici-
    pal Landfill Sites.
    See 1119
    Treatability  Studies   Under  CERCLA:  An
    Overview.
    See 1172
COMPREHENSIVE ENVIRONMENTAL
RESPONSE COMPENSATION AND LIABILITY
ACT (CERCLA)
    CERCL1S Characterization Project: National
    Results.
    See 0001
    CERCLJS Characterization Project: Region 3
    Results.
    See 0004
    CERCLIS Characterization Project: Region 4
    Results.
    See 0005
    CERCLIS Characterization Project: Region 5
    Results.
    See 0006
    CERCLIS Characterization Project: Region 6
    Results.
    See 0007
    CERCLIS Characterization Project: Region 7
    Results.
    See 0008
    CERCLIS Characterization Project: Region 8
    Results.
    See 0009
    CERCLIS Characterization Project: Region 9
    Results.
    See 0010
    CERCLIS Characterization  Project:  Region
    10 Results.
    See 0011
COMPREHENSIVE ENVIRONMENTAL
RESPONSE COMPENSATION AND LIABILITY
ACT OF 1980
    CERCLIS - WasteLAN - CleanLAN.
    See 0015
COMPUTER APPLICATIONS
    PREscore Software. Users Manual and Tuto-
    rial. Version 1.0.
    See 0374
COMPUTER PROGRAMS
    Computer Models Used to  Support Cleanup
    Decision-Making at Hazardous and Radioac-
    tive Waste Sites.
    See 1218
COMPUTERIZED SIMULATION
    Air/Superfund National Technical Guidance
    Study Series. Air Stripper Design  Manual.
    See 1374
    Air/Superfund National Technical Guidance
    Study Series. Comparisons of Air  Stripper
    Simulations and Field Performance Data.
    See  1376
    BEN: A Model  to Calculate the Economic
    Benefit of Noncompliance. User's  Manual.
    See 0513
    Contingency  Analysis Modeling  for Super-
    fund Sites and Other Sources.
     See 1219
 SU-10

-------
                                                        SUBJECT INDEX
                                                                                                    COORDINATED PROCUREMENT
     Continuous Release-Emergency  Response
     Notification System and Priority Assessment
     Model: Model Documentation.
     See 1143
     Continuous Release-Emergency  Response
     Notification System and Priority Assessment
     Model: User's Manual for EPA Regions
     See 1144
 CONNECTICUT
     National Priorities List Sites: Connecticut
     See 0168
     National Priorities List Sites: Connecticut.
     See 0169
     National Priorities  List Sites: Connecticut,
     1992.
     See 0170
     Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
     PRP Listing by Site for Connecticut.
     See 0639
     Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
     PRP Listing by Site for Connecticut.
     See 0640
     Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
     PRP Listing by Site for Connecticut.
     See 0641
 CONSENT ORDERS
     Transmittal of Model Consent Decree for
     CERCLA  Section  104(e) Information Re-
     quest Enforcement Actions.
     See 0888
 CONSTRUCTION
     NPL Construction Completion  Definition  at
     Bioremediation and Soil  Vapor  Extraction
     Sites.
     See 0365
 CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT
     ARCS  Construction Contract  Modification
     Procedures.
     See 0020
     Expediting Remedial Construction.
     See 1127
 CONTAINERS
     Specifications  and  Guidance for  Contami-
     nant-Free Sample Containers.
     See 0994
 CONTAINMENT
     Engineering Bulletin: Slurry Walls.
    See 1235
    Technical Guidance Document:  Construction
    Quality Management  for  Remedial Action
    and Remedial  Design Waste Containment
    Systems.
    See 1334
 CONTINGENCY PLANNING
    Air/Superfund  National Technical Guidance
    Study Series. Contingency Plans at Super-
    fund Sites Using Air Monitoring.
    See 1378
    Contingency Analysis  Modeling for Super-
    fund Sites and Other Sources.
    See 1219
    Oil  Spill Prevention, Control, and  Counter-
    measures Program. Task Force Report.
    See 0932
CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION
    ARCS (Alternative Remedial Contract Strate-
    gy) Contracts Users' Manual.
    See 0019
    CERCLIS  Data  Handling  Support Policy
    Statement.
    See 0013
    Contracting and Subcontracting Guide to the
    Superfund Program.
    See 0023
    Emergency  Response  Cleanup  Services
    Contracts  (ERGS). Users Manual.
    See 0024
     Implementation of the Alternative Remedial
     Contracting Strategy  (ARCS)  Task Force
     Recommendations: Transmittal of the Imple-
     mentation Plan.
     See 0030
     Inorganic Contract Compliance Screening
     System (ICCSS) Software (for Microcomput-
     ers).
     See 0034
     Inorganic Contract Compliance Screening
     System (ICCSS) Software for the PC (Ver-
     sion 3/90) User Manual.
     See 0035
     Mentor-Protege Program.
     See 0044
     Model Performance Standards for Superfund
     Project Officers, Deputy Project Officers, and
     Work Assignment Managers/Delivery Order
     Officers.
     See 0045
     Organic  Contract Compliance  Screening
     System (OCCSS) Software  (for Microcom-
     puters).
     See 0047
     Organic  Contract Compliance  Screening
     System (OCCSS) Software for the PC (Ver-
     sion 2/90) User Manual.
     See 0048
     Resources for Preparing  Independent Gov-
     ernment Estimates for Remedial Contracting
     Work Assignments.
     See 0066
     Superfund Contracts Management Issues.
     See 0072
     Superfund Response Action Contracts.
     See 0074
     USAGE  Preplaced and  Rapid  Response
     Contracts.
     See 1139
     User's  Guide to Contract Laboratory Pro-
     gram.
     See 0078
CONTRACT LABORATORY PROGRAM
     Guidelines for Effective Management of  the
     Contract Laboratory Program.
     See 0027
     Guidelines for Effective Management of  the
     Contract  Laboratory Program. Part 1. Con-
    tract Award. Part 2. Contract Administration.
    See 0028
    Sampler's Guide to the Contract Laboratory
    Program.
    See 0071
    USEPA Contract Laboratory Program Nation-
    al Functional Guidelines for Inorganic Data
    Review.
    See 0997
    User's  Guide  to  Contract Laboratory Pro-
    gram.
    See 0078
    User's Guide to the Contract Laboratory Pro-
    gram.
    See 0079
CONTRACT MANAGEMENT
    Ensuring the Adequacy of  Cost Share Provi-
    sions in Superfund State Contracts.
    See 0472
    Inorganic  Contract  Compliance  Screening
    System (ICCSS) Software  (ILM02.1 Version
    4) (for Microcomputers).
    See 0038
    Inorganic  Contract  Compliance  Screening
    System  (ICCSS) Software  (ILM02.1 Version
    5) (for Microcomputers).
    See 0039
    Obligation of Funds under Superfund State
    Contracts.
    See 0478
     Organic  Contract  Compliance  Screening
     System (OCCSS) Software  (OLM01.8 Ver-
     sion 6) (for Microcomputers).
     See 0053
     Procedure for Use of USAGE  Preplaced
     Contracts to Expedite  Superfund  Cleanup
     Tasks.
     See 1131
     Required  Contracts Management  Training
     for Regional  Superfund Personnel.
     See 0065
     Technical Assistance Team (TAT) Contracts
     Users' Manual.
     See 0075
 CONTRACTOR PERSONNEL
     Roles  and  Responsibilities  of  Regional
     Project Officers, Zone Project Officers, Work
     Assignment Managers and Contracting Offi-
     cers for the  RCRA Enforcement, Permitting
     and Assistance Contracts (REPA).
     See 0070
 CONTRACTS
     Approval of Long Term Contracting Strategy
    for   Superfund   (Superfund  Management
     Review: Recommendation E.2).
    See 0018
    Long-Term Contracting Strategy for Super-
    fund.
    See 0042
 COOPERATIVE AGREEMENTS
    Guidance on Site Assessment  Cooperative
    Agreements.
    See 0475
    Involvement of Superfund Program  Manag-
    ers   in Superfund  Response  Agreement
    Audits.
    See 0099
COORDINATED PROCUREMENT
    Site Enforcement Tracking  System (SETS):
    Frequency by Party Name Report.
    See 0607
    Site Enforcement Tracking  System (SETS):
    Frequency by Party Name Report.
    See 0608
    Site Enforcement  Tracking  System (SETS):
    National Frequency  by  PRP Name  Report.
    See 0614
    Site Enforcement  Tracking  System (SETS): '
    National PRP Listing Alphabetically by PRP
    Name.
    See 0615
    Site Enforcement  Tracking  System (SETS):
    National PRP  Listing  by Site.
    See 0617
    Site  Enforcement  Tracking  System (SETS):
    PRP Listing by Site for Alabama.
    See 0621
    Site Enforcement  Tracking System (SETS):
    PRP Listing by Site for Alabama.
    See 0622
    Site Enforcement  Tracking System (SETS):
    PRP Listing by Site for American Samoa.
    See 0624
    Site Enforcement  Tracking System (SETS):
    PRP Listing by Site for American  Samoa.
    See 0625
   Site Enforcement Tracking System  (SETS);
   PRP Listing by Site for Arizona.
   See 0627
   Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
   PRP Listing by Site for Arizona.
   See 0628
   Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
   PRP Listing by Site for Arkansas.
   See 0630
                                                                                                                           SU-11

-------
COORDINATED PROCUREMENT
      SUBJECT INDEX
  11 Stte Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
    PRP Listing by Site for Arkansas.
    Soa0631
    Site Enforcementtracking System (SETS):
  ! PRP Listing by Site for California.
    Seo0633
  : Stte Enfofcemont Tracking System (SETS):
    PRP Listing by Site for California.
    Sea 0634
    SHe Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
    PRP Listing by Site for Colorado.
    See 0636
    Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
    PRP Listing by Site for Colorado.
    See 0637
    SHa Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
    PRP Listing by Site for Connecticut.
    See 0639
  ; Sjta Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
  I- PRP Listing by sle for Connecticut.
    See 0640
    Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
    PRP Listing by SKe for Delaware.
    See 0642
  I Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
    PRP Listing by Site for Delaware.
    Sea 0643
    Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
  ! PRP Listing by Stta for Florida.
    See 0645
    Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
  : PRP Listing by Site for Florida.
    See 0646
    SHe Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
    PRP Listing by Sfte for Georgia.
    See 0648
    Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
    PRP Listing by Site for Georgia.
    Sea 0649
    Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
    PRP Listing by Site for Idaho.
    See 0651
    Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
    PRP Listing by Site for Idaho.
    See 0652
    Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
    PRP Listing by Site for Illinois.
    Sea 0654
  " Site Enforcement Tracking System  (SETS):
    PRP Listing by Site for Illinois.
    See 0655
  i Site Enforcement Tracking System  (SETS):
  ji PRP Listing by Site for Indiana.
    See 0657
    Site Enforcement Tracking System  (SETS):
    PRP Listing by Site for Indiana.
    See 0658
    Site Enforcement Tracking System  (SETS):
    PRP Listing by Site for Iowa.
    See 0660
    Site Enforcement Tracking System  (SETS):
    PRP Listing by Site for Iowa.
    See 0661
    Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
    PRP Listing by Site for Kansas.
    See 0663
    Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
    PRP UsUng by Site for Kansas.
    See 0664
  : Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
     PRP Listing by Site for Kentucky.
    See 0666
    Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
     PRP Listing by Site for Kentucky.
    See 0667
     Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
     PRP Listing by Site for Louisiana,
     See 0669
     Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
  	PRP Listing by Site for Louisiana.
     See 0670
 gU-12
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Maine.
See 0672
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Maine.
See 0673
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Maryland.
See 0675
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Maryland.
See 0676
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Massachusetts.
See 0678
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Massachusetts.
See 0679
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Michigan.
See 0681
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Michigan.
See 0682
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Minnesota.
See 0684
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Minnesota.
See 0685
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Mississippi.
See 0687
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Mississippi.
See 0688
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Missouri.
See 0690
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Missouri.
See 0691
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Montana.
See 0693
Site Enforcement Tracking System  (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Montana.
See 0694
Site Enforcement Tracking System  (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Nebraska.
See 0696
Site Enforcement Tracking  System  (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Nebraska.
See 0697
Site Enforcement Tracking  System  (SETS):
 PRP Listing by Site for Nevada.
See 0699
Site Enforcement Tracking  System (SETS):
 PRP Listing by Site for Nevada.
See 0700
 Site Enforcement Tracking  System (SETS):
 PRP Listing by Site for New Hampshire.
 See 0702
 Site Enforcement Tracking  System (SETS):
 PRP Listing by Site for New Hampshire.
 See 0703
 Site Enforcement Tracking  System (SETS):
 PRP Listing by Site for New Jersey.
 See 0705
 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
 PRP Listing by Site for New Jersey.
 See 0706
 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
 PRP Listing by Site for New Mexico.
 See 0708
 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
 PRP Listing by Site for New Mexico.
 See 0709
 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
 PRP Listing by Site for New York.
 See 0711
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for New York.
See 0712
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for North Carolina.
See 0714
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for North Carolina.
See 0715
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for North Dakota.
See 0717
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for North Dakota.
See 0718
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by  Site for Northern Marianas.
See 0720
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by  Site for Northern Marianas.
See 0721
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Ohio.
See 0723
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Ohio.
See 0724
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Oklahoma.
See 0726
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Oklahoma.
See 0727
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Oregon.
See 0729
Site Enforcement Tracking System  (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Oregon.
See 0730
Site Enforcement Tracking System  (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Pennsylvania.
See 0732
Site Enforcement Tracking System  (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Pennsylvania.
See 0733
Site Enforcement Tracking System  (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Puerto Rico.
See 0735
Site Enforcement Tracking System  (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Puerto Rico.
See 0736
Site Enforcement Tracking System  (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Rhode Island.
See 0787
 Site Enforcement Tracking System  (SETS):
 PRP Listing by Site for Rhode Island.
 See 0788
 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
 PRP Listing by Site for South Carolina.
 See 0790
 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
 PRP Listing by Site for South Carolina.
 See 0791
 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
 PRP Listing by Site for South Dakota.
 See 0793
 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
 PRP Listing by Site for South Dakota.
 See 0794
 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
 PRP Listing by Site for Tennessee.
 See 0796
 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
 PRP Listing by Site for Tennessee.
 See 0797
 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
 PRP Listing by Site for Texas.
 See 0799
     |                           .     .

-------
                                                          SUBJECT INDEX
                                                                                                                           DATA BASES
      Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)-
      PRP Listing by Site for Texas.
      See 0800
      Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
      PRP Listing by Site for Trust Territories.
      See 0802
      Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
      PRP Listing by Site for Trust Territories
      See 0803
      Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)-
      PRP Listing by Site for Utah.
      See 0805
      Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
      PRP Listing by Site for Utah.
      See 0806
      Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)-
      PRP Listing by Site for Vermont.
      See 0808
      Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)-
      PRP Listing by Site for Vermont.
      See 0809
      Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
      PRP Listing by Site for Virginia.
      See 0811
      Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)-
      PRP Listing by Site for Washington.   -
      See 0813
    -Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
      PRP Listing by Site for Washington.   -
      See 0814
     Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
      PRP Listing by Site for West Virginia
     See 0816
     Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)-
     PRP Listing by Site for West Virginia.
     See 0817
     Site Enforcement Tracking System  (SETS):
     PRP Listing by Site for Wisconsin.
     See 0819
     Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)-
     PRP Listing by Site for Wisconsin.
     See 0820
     Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
     PRP Listing by Site for Wyoming.
     See 0822
     Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)-
     PRP Listing by Site for Wyoming.
     See 0823
     Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
     PRP National  Listing Alphabetically by Party
     Name.
     See 0826
     Site Enforcement Tracking  System (SETS):
     PRP National Listing Alphabetically by Party
     Name.
     See 0827
     Site Enforcement Tracking  System (SETS):
     PRP National Listing by Site.
     See 0832
     Site Enforcement Tracking  System (SETS)-
     PRP National Listing by Site.
    See 0833
    Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
    PRP Site Listing by Site for Virginia.
    See 0848
CORA (COST OF REMEDIAL ACTION)
    Cost of Remedial Action Model.
    See 1085
CORPS OF ENGINEERS
    Procedure for Use of USAGE Preplaced
    Contracts to Expedite Superfund  Cleanup
    Tasks.
    See 1131
COST ANALYSIS
    Technology Evaluation  Report SITE Program
    Demonstration Test, HAZCON  Solidification,
    Douglassville, Pennsylvania. Volume 1
    See 1569
 COST ESTIMATES
     Cost of Remedial Actions (CORA) Model:
     Overview and Applications.
     See 1086
     Control  Technology: Estimating  Innovative
     Technology Costs for the SITE Program.
     See 1222
     Cost  Estimating  Systems  for  Remedial
     Action Projects.
     See 1123
     Estimation  of the  Cost of  Using Chemical
     Protective Clothing.
     See 1244
     Scoper's Notes: An  RI/FS Costing Guide.
     Bringing  in a Quality RI/FS on  Time and
     Within Budget.
     See 1117
 COSTS
     CASHOUT  Model: Calculates Current Value
     of Superfund Cleanup Costs  (Version  1.2)
     (for Microcomputers).
     See 1208
     CASHOUT User's Manual for Superfund.
     See 0515
 COVERINGS
     Engineering Bulletin: Landfill Covers.
    See 1233
    Ground-Water Issue:  The  Effects of Well
    Casing Material on Ground Water-Quality.
    See 1457
CREATED WETLANDS
    Handbook for Constructed Wetlands  Receiv-
    ing Acid Mine  Drainage.
    See 1588
CREOSOTE
    Alternative Biological  Treatment  Processes
    for Remediation of Creosote-and PCP-Con-
    taminated Materials: Bench-Scale  Treatabil-
    ity Studies.
    See 1418
    On-Site Engineering Report of the  Slurry-
    Phase  Biological  Reactor  for Pilot-Scale
    Testing on Contaminated Soil.
    See 1520
    Pilot-Scale Demonstration of a  Slurry-Phase
    Biological Reactor for Creosote-Contaminat-
    ed Soil. Applications Analysis Report.
    See 1426
    Bench-Scale Evaluation  of  Alternative Bio-
    logical Treatment Processes for the Remedi-
    ation of Pentachlorophenol-  and  Creosote-
    Contaminated  Materials: Slurry-Phase Biore-
    mediation.
    See 1419
    Bench-Scale Evaluation of Alternative Bio-
    logical Treatment Processes for the Remedi-
    ation of Pentachlorophenol- and Creosote-
    Contaminated  Materials: Solid-Phase Biore-
    mediation.
   See  1420
    Biodegradation of Creosote and Pentachlor-
   ophenol   in  Contaminated  Groundwater:
   Chemical and Biological Assessment.
   See 1432
   Detoxification of Pentachlorophenol and Cre-
   osote Contaminated Groundwater  by  Physi-
   cal Extraction:  Chemical and Biological As-
   sessment.
   See 1438
   Removal of Creosote from Soil  by Thermal
   Desorption.
   See 1530
   Technology Evaluation  Report: Pilot-Scale
   Demonstration  of a  Slurry-Phase Biological
   Reactor for Creosote-Contaminated  Soil.
   Volume 1.
   See 1542
 CRIMINAL INVESTIGATIONS
     Criminal Investigations and  the Superfund
     Program.
     See 0469
 CRUDE OIL
     National Oil and Hazardous Substances Pol-
     lution Contingency Plan (as Published in the
     Federal Register, March 8,  1990).
     See 0145
 CYCLONE COMBUSTORS
     Technology Evaluation Report: Babcock and
     Wilcox  Cyclone  Furnace  Vitrification  Tech-
     nology. Volume 1.
     See 1337
     Technology Evaluation Report: Babcock and
     Wilcox Cyclone  Furnace Vitrification  Tech-
     nology. Volume 2.
     See 1338
 DATA ACQUISITION
     Cleanup  Information Bulletin  Board System
     Users Guide. (CLU-IN: Cleanup  Information
     Bulletin Board).
     See 1215
     Guidance for Data Useability in Risk Assess-
     ment.
     See 1030
     Guidance for Data Useability in Risk Assess-
     ment. Interim Report.
     See 1032
DATA AQUISITION
    Accessing Federal Data Bases for Contami-
    nated Site Clean-Up Technologies.
    See 1188
DATA BASE MANAGEMENT
    First 125 De Minimis Settlements: Statistics
    from EPA's De Minimis Database.
    See 0543
    Superfund Soils Data Management System.
    See 1536
DATA BASES
    Accessing Federal Data Bases for Contami-
    nated Site Clean-Up Technologies  (Second
    Edition).
    See 1189
    Emergency Response Notification System.
    See 0927
    Site  Assessment  Information   Directory
    (SAID) Region 1 (for Microcomputers).  Date
    of Coverage: October 1991.
    See 0382
    Site  Assessment  Information   Directory
    (SAID) Region 2 (for Microcomputers).  Date
    of Coverage: October 1991.
    See 0383
    Site  Assessment  Information   Directory
    (SAID) Region 3 (for Microcomputers).  Date
    of Coverage: October 1991.
    See 0384
    Site  Assessment  Information  Directory
    (SAID) Region 4 (for Microcomputers).  Date
    of Coverage: October 1991.
    See 0385
    Site   Assessment  Information  Directory
    (SAID) Region 5 (for Microcomputers). Date
   of Coverage: 1991.
   See 0386
   Site   Assessment  Information  Directory
   (SAID) Region 6 (for Microcomputers). Date
   of Coverage: October 1991.
   See 0387
   Site   Assessment  Information  Directory
   (SAID) Region 7 (for Microcomputers). Date
   of Coverage: October 1991.
   See 0388
                                                                                                                              SU-13

-------
DATA FILE
                                                        SUBJECT  INDEX
    Site   Assessment   Information   Directory
    (SAID) Region 8 (for Microcomputers). Date
    of Coverage: 1991.
    Sea 0389
    Site   Assessment   Information   Directory
    (SAID) Region 9 (for Microcomputers). Date
    of Coverage: October 1991.
    See 0390
    Site   Assessment   Information   Directory
    (SAID) Region 10 (for Microcomputers). Date
    of Coverage: October 1991.
    Soo 0391
DATA FILE
    CERCLIS  (Comprehensive   Environmental
    Response, Compensation, and Liability infor-
    mation System) Site Location Extract.
    Soo 0012
    NotilicaUon of  Hazardous Substance  Sites
    (Section 103(c».
    See 1147
   :' S(te Enforcement Tracking System  (SETS)
    (National),
    Sea 0611
    Site Enforcement Tracking System  (SETS)
    (National) (for Microcomputers).
    S900613
    Site Enforcement Tracking System  (SETS)
    (National - 3 1/2 Inch  Diskette, IBM  PS/2
    Compatible) (for Microcomputers).
    See 0620
    Site Enforcement Tracking System  (SETS)
    (Region 1-31/2  Inch Diskette IBM  PS/2
    Compatible) (for Microcomputers).
    See 0849
    Site Enforcement Tracking System  (SETS)
    (Region 1) (for Microcomputers).
    See 0850
    Site Enforcement Tracking System  (SETS)
    (Region 2 -  3  1/2  Inch Diskette IBM  PS/2
    Compatible) (for Microcomputers).
    Sea 0851
   , Site Enforcement Tracking System  (SETS)
    (Rogton 2) (for Microcomputers).
    Sea 0852
    Site Enforcement Tracking System  (SETS)
    (Region 3-31/2  Inch Diskette IBM PS/2
    Compatible) (for Microcomputers).
                    "    ......
                     ,
   1 Site Enforcement Tracking  System (SETS)
    (Region 3) (for Microcomputers).
    Soe 0854
   ....... Site Enforcement Tracking  System (SETS)
    (Region 4-31/2 Inch  Diskette IBM PS/2
    Compatible) (for Microcomputers).
    Sea 0855
    Site Enforoemerjt Tracking  System (SETS)
    (Region 4) (for Microcomputers).
    See 0856
   1 Site Enforcement Tracking  System (SETS)
    (Region 5-31/2 Inch  Diskette IBM PS/2
    Compatible) (for Microcomputers).
    See 0857
   "Site Enforcement Tracking  System (SETS)
    (Region 5) (for Microcomputers).
    See 0858
   - Site Enforcement Tracking  System (SETS)
    (Region 6-3 1/2 Inch  Diskette IBM PS/2
   : Compatible) (for Microcomputers).
    Sea 0859
   i Site Enforcement Tracking  System (SETS)
    (Region 6) (for Microcomputers).
    See 0860
    Site Enforcement Tracking  System (SETS)
   ....... (Region 7 - 3 1/2 Inch  Diskette IBM PS/2
   ; Compatible) (for Microcomputers).
    See 0861
   ' Site Enforcement Tracking  System (SETS)
    (Region 7) (for Microcomputers).
    See 0862
 SU-14
   Site Enforcement Tracking  System (SETS)
   (Region 8-3 1/2 Inch Diskette IBM PS/2
   Compatible) (for Microcomputers).
   See 0863
   Site Enforcement Tracking  System (SETS)
   (Region 8) (for Microcomputers).
   See 0864
   Site Enforcement Tracking  System (SETS)
   (Region 9-31/2 Inch Diskette IBM PS/2
   Compatible) (for Microcomputers).
   See 0865
   Site Enforcement Tracking  System (SETS)
   (Region 9) (for Microcomputers).
   See 0866
   Site Enforcement Tracking  System (SETS)
   (Region 10 -  3 1/2 Inch Diskette  IBM PS/2
   Compatible) (for Microcomputers).
   See 0867
   Site Enforcement Tracking  System (SETS)
   (Region 10) (for Microcomputers).
   See 0868
DATA QUALITY
   Data Quality  Objectives Process for Super-
   fund.
   See 0982
DATA QUALITY OBJECTIVES
   Data Quality  Objectives Decision Error Fea-
   sibility Trials  (DEFT) Beta Version  1.01.
   User's Guide.
   See 0979
    Data Quality  Objectives  Process for Super-
   fund.
   See 0981
    Data Quality  Objectives  Process for Super-
   fund: Interim Final Guidance.
   See 0983
    Data Quality  Objectives  Process for Super-
   fund: Workbook.
    See 0984
DATA REQUIREMENTS
    Engineering  Bulletin: Technology  Preselec-
    tion Data Requirements.
    See 1405
DDT
    Health Effects Assessment for DDT.
    See 1041
DE MINIMIS SETTLEMENTS
    First 125 De Mlnlmis Settlements: Statistics
    from EPA's De Minimis Database.
    See 0543
DEBRIS
    Obtaining a Soil and Debris Treatability Vari-
    ance for Removal Actions. Superfund LDR
    Guide No. 6B.
    See 0430
DECENTRALIZATION (DISPERSAL)
    Decentralization of Superfund Bottle Reposi-
    tory Functions.
    See 0985
DECISION MAKING
    Framework for  Real-Time  Decision-Making:
    New Bedford Harbor Pilot Dredging  Study.
    See 1587
DECONTAMINATION
    Field Standard Operating Procedures for the
    Decontamination of  Response   Personnel
    F.S.O.P. No.  7.
    See 0913
    Innovative Technology: Soil Washing.
    See 1515
DEHALOGENATION
    Chemical Dehalogenation Treatability  Stud-
    ies under CERCLA: An Overview.
    See 1153
    Chemical Dehalogenation Treatment: APEG
    Treatment.
    See 1210
    Citizen's Guide to Glycolate Dehalogenation.
    See 0454
    Innovative  Technology:  Glycolate  Dehalo-
    genation.
    See 1513
    Reductive Dehalogenation of  Organic Con-
    taminants  in  Soils  and Ground  Water.
    Ground Water Issue.
    See 1527
DELAWARE
    National Priorities List Sites: Delaware.
    See 0171
    National Priorities List Sites: Delaware.
    See 0172
    National Priorities List Sites: Delaware, 1992.
    See 0173
    Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
    PRP Listing by Site for Delaware.
    See 0642
    Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
    PRP Listing by Site for Delaware.
    See 0643
    Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
    PRP Listing by Site for Delaware.
    See 0644
DEMONSTRATION PROGRAMS
    Demonstration  of Hazardous Waste Site
    Treatment Technologies.
    See 1227
    Demonstration Projects Under the U.S. EPA
    Superfund Innovative Technology Evaluation
    Program.
    See 1230
    Superfund Innovative Technology Evaluation
    Program: Annual Report  to Congress 1992.
    See 1309
DENSE NONAQUEOUS PHASE LIQUIDS
    Estimating  Potential   for  Occurrence  of
    DNAPL at Superfund Sites.
    See 1442
DESORPTION
    On-Site Engineering  Report  for  the  Low-
    Temperature Thermal  Desorption Pilot-Scale
    Test on Contaminated Soil.
    See 1519
    Removal of Creosote from Soil by Thermal
    Desorption.
    See 1530
    Thermal Desorption Treatment.
    See 1357
DIOXIN
    Evaluation of Personal Cooling Devices  for
    Dioxin Clean-Up Operation.
    See 1248
DIRECTIVES
    Accessing the $50 Million Set-Aside in the
    Remedial Action Budget for Quick Response
    at National Priorities List Sites.
    See 1082
    Authorization for Regional Administrators to
    Approve Consistency  Exemptions at NPL
    Sites.
    See 0998
    Discussions with the Public Concerning NPL
    Listings.
    See 0339
    NPL  Construction Completion Definition at
    Bioremediation  and Soil Vapor  Extraction
    Sites.
    See 0365
    Superfund   Accelerated  Cleanup  Model
    (SACM) Coordination Strategy.
    See 0120
 DIRECTORIES
    Hazmat Team Planning Guidance.
    See 0915
                                                                                                      I
                            i ?ill.'fl j,'!i, ..dlllKfi l!:l !',< wLllijLHiiilii/'iliL nil
                                                        iplllfanlliiini! iiUII itihl!	,,11:  ji	i,li,,' ,,i', ',;,	
                                                                                Hill ii'lil	,,,,11;, ,,"„! li'liaili	|, j ij	Ilia, .idlliiliMlljlidl I	II.'Li!	,1'	i,11!
                                                                                                                          ..iiini'jliil 'i	jiji	Illl^PliilliailliilJ.!;!!!!,!, ijlillliul „

-------
                                                      SUBJECT INDEX
                                                                                                                     DIRECTORIES
 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
 Frequency by Party Name Report.
 See 0608
 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
 Frequency by Party Name Report.
 See 0609
 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
 Frequency by PRP Name Report, September
 26,1991.
 See 0610
 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
 National Alphabetical Report by PRP Name,
 September 26,1991.
 See 0612
 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
 National Frequency by PRP Name Report.
 See 0614
 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
 National PRP Listing Alphabetically by PRP
 Name.
 See 0615
 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
 National PRP Listing by Site.
 See 0617
 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
 National PRP Listing by Site.
 See 0618
 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
 National PRP Report by Site, September 26,
 1991.
 See 0619
 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)
 (National - 3 1/2 Inch Diskette, IBM PS/2
 Compatible) (for Microcomputers).
 See 0620
 Site Enforcement Tracking  System (SETS):
 PRP Listing by Site for Alabama.
 See 0621
 Site Enforcement Tracking  System (SETS):
 PRP Listing by Site for Alabama.
 See 0622
 Site Enforcement Tracking  System (SETS):
 PRP Listing by Site for Alabama.
 See 0623
 Site Enforcement Tracking  System (SETS):
 PRP Listing by Site for American Samoa.
 See 0624
 Site Enforcement Tracking  System (SETS):
 PRP Listing by Site for American Samoa.
 See 0625
 Site Enforcement Tracking  System (SETS):
 PRP Listing by Site for American Samoa.
 See 0626
 Site Enforcement Tracking  System (SETS):
 PRP Listing by Site for Arizona.
 See 0627
 Site Enforcement Tracking  System (SETS):
 PRP Listing by Site for Arizona.
 See 0628
 Site Enforcement Tracking  System (SETS):
 PRP Listing by Site for Arizona.
 See 0629
 Site Enforcement Tracking  System (SETS):
 PRP Listing by Site for Arkansas.
 See 0630
 Site  Enforcement Tracking  System (SETS):
 PRP Listing by Site for Arkansas.
 See 0631
 Site  Enforcement  Tracking  System (SETS):
 PRP Listing by Site for Arkansas.
 See 0632
 Site  Enforcement  Tracking System (SETS):
 PRP Listing by Site for California.
 See 0633
 Site  Enforcement  Tracking System (SETS):
 PRP Listing by Site for California.
See 0634
Site  Enforcement  Tracking System (SETS):
 PRP Listing by Site for California.
See 0635
 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
 PRP Listing by Site for Colorado.
 See 0636
 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
 PRP Listing by Site for Colorado.
 See 0637
 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
 PRP Listing by Site for Colorado.
 See 0638
 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
 PRP Listing by Site for Connecticut.
 See 0639
 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
 PRP Listing by Site for Connecticut.
 See 0640
 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
 PRP Listing by Site for Connecticut.
 See 0641
 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
 PRP Listing by Site for Delaware.
 See 0642
 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
 PRP Listing by Site for Delaware.
 See 0643
 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
 PRP Listing by Site for Delaware.
 See 0644
 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
 PRP Listing by Site for Florida.
 See 0645
 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
 PRP Listing by Site for Florida.
 See 0646
 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
 PRP Listing by Site for Florida.
 See 0647
 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
 PRP Listing by Site for Georgia.
 See 0648
 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
 PRP Listing by Site for Georgia.
 See 0649
 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
 PRP Listing by Site for Georgia.
 See 0650
 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
 PRP Listing by Site for Idaho.
 See 0651
 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
 PRP Listing by Site for Idaho.
 See 0652
 Site Enforcement Tracking  System (SETS):
 PRP Listing by Site for Idaho.
 See 0653
 Site Enforcement Tracking  System (SETS):
 PRP Listing by Site for Illinois.
 See 0654
 Site Enforcement Tracking  System (SETS):
 PRP Listing by Site for Illinois.
 See 0655
 Site Enforcement Tracking  System (SETS):
 PRP Listing by Site for Illinois.
 See 0656
 Site Enforcement Tracking  System (SETS):
 PRP Listing by Site for Indiana.
 See 0657
 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
 PRP Listing by Site for Indiana.
 See 0658
 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
 PRP Listing by Site for Indiana.
See 0659
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
 PRP Listing by Site for Iowa.
See 0660
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
 PRP Listing by Site for Iowa.
See 0661
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Iowa.
See 0662
 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
 PRP Listing by Site for Kansas.
 See 0663
 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
 PRP Listing by Site for Kansas.
 See 0664
 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
 PRP Listing by Site for Kansas.
 See 0665
 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
 PRP Listing by Site for Kentucky.
 See 0666
 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
 PRP Listing by Site for Kentucky.
 See 0667
 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
 PRP Listing by Site for Kentucky.
 See 0668
 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
 PRP Listing by Site for Louisiana.
 See 0669
 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
 PRP Listing by Site for Louisiana.
 See 0670
 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
 PRP Listing by Site for Louisiana.
 See 0671
 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
 PRP Listing by Site for Maine.
 See 0672
 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
 PRP Listing by Site for Maine.
 See 0673
 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
 PRP Listing by Site for Maine.
 See 0674
 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
 PRP Listing by Site for Maryland.
 See 0675
 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
 PRP Listing by Site for Maryland,
 See 0676
 Site Enforcement Tracking  System (SETS):
 PRP Listing by Site for Maryland.
 See 0677
 Site Enforcement Tracking  System (SETS):
 PRP Listing by Site for Massachusetts.
 See 0678
 Site Enforcement Tracking  System (SETS):
 PRP Listing by Site for Massachusetts.
 See 0679
 Site Enforcement Tracking  System (SETS):
 PRP Listing by Site for Massachusetts.
See 0680
Site Enforcement Tracking  System (SETS):
 PRP Listing by Site for Michigan.
See 0681
Site Enforcement Tracking  System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Michigan.
See 0682
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Michigan.
See 0683
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Minnesota.
See 0684
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Minnesota.
See 0685
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Minnesota.
See 0686
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Mississippi.
See 0687
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Mississippi.
See 0688
                                                                                                                           SU-15

-------
DIRECTORIES
                                                        SUBJECT INDEX
    Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
    PRP Listing by Sits for Mississippi.
    Sea 0689
   ' Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
   t	PRP Listing by Sits for Missouri.
    See 0690
   ~ Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
    PRP Listing by Site for Missouri.
    See 0691
   , SHa Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
   '. PRP Usting by Site for Missouri.
    See 0692
   !! Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
    PRP Listing by Site for Montana.
    See 0693
   ; Sfta Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
    PRP Listing by Site for Montana.
    Sea 0694
   ;, Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
    PRP Listing by Site for Montana.
    Sea 0695
    Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
    PRP Listing by Site for Nebraska.
    Sea 0696
    Stte Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
    PRP Listing by Site for Nebraska.
    See 0697
    Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
    PRP Usting by Site for Nebraska.
    Sea 069B
   ! Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
   ; PRP Listing by Site for Nevada.
    Sea 0699
   ; Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
   , PR? Listing by Site for Nevada.
    Seo 0700
    SHa Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
    PRP Usting by Sits for Nevada.
    See 0701
    Sita Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
    PRP Usting by Site for New Hampshire.
    Soa 0702
    Sfte Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
    PRP Usting by Site for New Hampshire.
    Se« 0703
    Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
   " PRP Usting by Stte for New Hampshire.
    Soa 0704
    Stte Enforcement Tracking  System (SETS):
    PRP Usting by Site for New Jersey.
    Sea 0705
    Sits Enforcement Tracking  System (SETS):
    PRP Usting by Site for New Jersey.
    Sea 0706
    Stta Enforcement Tracking  System (SETS):
    PRP Usting by SRe for New Jersey.
    See 0707
    Sita Enforcement Tracking  System (SETS):
   ; PRP Listing by Stte for New Mexico.
    Sea 0708
    Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
    PRP Listing by Site for New Mexico.
    See 0709
   1 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
   1 PRP Listing by Site for New Mexico.
    Sea 0710
    Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
    PRP Listing by Sfte for New York.
    Sea 0711
    Site Enforcement  Tracking System (SETS):
    PRP Listing by Site for New York.
    Sao 0712
    Stte Enforcement  Tracking System (SETS):
    PRP Usting by Site for New York.
    Sea 0713
    Site Enforcement  Tracking System (SETS):
    PRP Usting by Site for North Carolina.
    Sea 0714
    Site Enforcement  Tracking System (SETS):
   i PRP Usting by Site for North Carolina.
    Sea 0715
Site Enforcement Tracking  System (SETS):
PRP Usting by Site for North Carolina.
See 0716
Site Enforcement Tracking  System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for North Dakota.
See 0717
Site Enforcement Tracking  System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for North Dakota.
See 0718
Site Enforcement Tracking  System (SETS):
PRP Usting by Site for North Dakota.
See 0719
Site Enforcement Tracking  System (SETS):
PRP Usting by Site for Northern  Marianas.
See 0720
Site Enforcement Tracking  System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Northern  Marianas.
See 0721
Site Enforcement Tracking  System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Northern  Marianas.
See 0722
Site Enforcement Tracking  System (SETS):
PRP Usting by Site for Ohio.
See 0723
Site Enforcement Tracking  System (SETS):
PRP Usting by Site for Ohio.
See 0724
Site Enforcement Tracking  System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Ohio.
See 0725
Site Enforcement Tracking  System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Oklahoma.
See 0726
Site Enforcement Tracking  System (SETS):
PRP Usting by Site for Oklahoma.
See 0727
Site Enforcement Tracking  System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Oklahoma.
See 0728
Site Enforcement Tracking  System (SETS):
PRP Usting by Site for Oregon.
See 0729
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Usting by Site for Oregon.
See 0730
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Usting by Site for Oregon.
See 0731
Site Enforcement Tracking System  (SETS):
PRP Usting by Site for Pennsylvania.
See 0732
Site Enforcement Tracking System  (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Pennsylvania.
See 0733
Site Enforcement Tracking System  (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Pennsylvania.
See 0734
Site Enforcement Tracking System  (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Puerto Rico.
See 0735
Site Enforcement  Tracking System  (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Puerto Rico.
See 0736
Site Enforcement  Tracking System  (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Puerto Rico.
See 0737
Site Enforcement Tracking System  (SETS):
 PRP Usting by Site for Region 1.
See 0738
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
 PRP  Usting by Site for Region 1,  January
22, 1992.
See 0741
 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
 PRP Usting by Site for  Region 1. Volume 1.
 See 0742
 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
 PRP Listing by Site for Region 2.
 See 0743
Site Enforcement Tracking  System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 2, January
22, 1992.
See 0746
Site Enforcement Tracking  System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 2. Volume 2.
See 0747
Site Enforcement Tracking  System (SETS):
PRP Usting by Site for Region 3.
See 0748
Site Enforcement Tracking  System (SETS):
PRP Usting by Site for Region 3, January
22, 1992.
See 0750
Site Enforcement Tracking  System (SETS):
PRP Usting by Site for Region 3. Volume 3.
See 0751
Site Enforcement Tracking  System (SETS):
PRP Usting by Site for Region 4.
See 0752
Site Enforcement Tracking  System (SETS):
PRP Usting by Site for Region 4, January
22,1992.
See 0755
Site Enforcement Tracking  System (SETS):
PRP Usting by Site for Region 4. Volume 4.
See 0756
Site Enforcement Tracking  System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 5.
See 0757
Site Enforcement Tracking  System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region  5, January
22, 1992.
See 0760
Site Enforcement Tracking  System (SETS):
PRP Usting by Site for Region 5. Volume 5.
See 0761
Site Enforcement Tracking  System (SETS):
PRP Usting by Site for Region 6.
See 0762
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Usting by  Site for Region  6, January
22, 1992.
See 0765
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Usting by Site for Region 6. Volume 6.
See 0766
Site Enforcement  Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Usting by Site for Region 7.
See 0767
Site Enforcement  Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Usting by Site for Region  7, January
22,1992.
See 0770
Site Enforcement  Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 7. Volume 7.
See 0771
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Usting by Site for Region 8.
See 0772
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Usting by Site for  Region, 8, January
22, 1992.
See 0775
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
 PRP Usting by Site for Region 8. Volume 8.
 See 0776
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
 PRP Usting by Site for Region 9.
 See 0777
 Site Enforcement Tracking System  (SETS):
 PRP Listing by Site for Region 9.
 See 0778
 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
 PRP  Listing  by Site for Region 9, January
 22, 1992.
 See 0780
 SU-16

-------
                                                      SUBJECT INDEX
                                                                                                                      DIRECTORIES
  Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
  PRP Listing by Site for Region 9. Volume 9.
  See 0781
  Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
  PRP Listing by Site for Region 10.
  See 0782
  Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
  PRP Listing by Site for Region 10, January
  22, 1992.
  See 0785
  Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
  PRP Listing by Site for Region 10. Volume
  10.
  See 0786
  Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
  PRP Listing by Site for Rhode Island.
  See 0787
  Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
  PRP Listing by Site for Rhode Island.
  See 0788
  Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
  PRP Listing by Site for Rhode Island.
  See 0789
  Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
  PRP Listing by Site for South Carolina.
 See 0790
 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
  PRP Listing by Site for South Carolina.
 See 0791
 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
 PRP Listing by Site for South Carolina.
 See 0792
 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
 PRP Listing by Site for South Dakota.
 See 0793
 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
 PRP Listing by Site for South Dakota.
 See 0794
 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
 PRP Listing by Site for South Dakota.
 See 0795
 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)-
 PRP Listing by Site for Tennessee.
 See 0796
 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
 PRP Listing by Site for Tennessee.
 See 0797
 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
 PRP Listing by Site for Tennessee.
 See 0798
 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
 PRP Listing by Site for Texas.
 See 0799
 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
 PRP Listing by Site for Texas.
 See 0800
 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
 PRP Listing by Site for Texas.
 See 0801
 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
 PRP Listing by Site for Trust Territories.
 See 0802
 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
 PRP Listing by Site for Trust Territories.
 See 0803
 Site Enforcement  Tracking System (SETS):
 PRP Listing by Site for Trust Territories.
 See 0804
 Site Enforcement  Tracking System (SETS):
 PRP Listing by Site for Utah.
See 0805
Site Enforcement  Tracking System (SETS)-
 PRP Listing by  Site for Utah.
See 0806
Site Enforcement  Tracking System (SETS)-
PRP Listing by  Site for Utah.
See 0807
Site Enforcement  Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by  Site for Vermont.
See 0808
  Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
  PRP Listing by Site for Vermont.
  See 0809
  Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
  PRP Listing by Site for Vermont.
  See 0810
  Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
  PRP Listing by Site for Virginia.
  See 0811
  Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
  PRP Listing by Site for Virginia.
  See 0812
  Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
  PRP Listing by Site for Washington.
  See 0813
  Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
  PRP Listing by Site for Washington.
  See 0814
  Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
  PRP Listing by Site for Washington.
  See 0815
  Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
  PRP Listing by Site for West Virginia.
  See 0816
  Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
  PRP Listing by Site for West Virginia.
  See 0817
  Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
  PRP Listing by Site for West Virginia.
 See 0818
 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
 PRP Listing by Site for Wisconsin.
 See 0819
 Site Enforcement Tracking System  (SETS):
 PRP Listing by Site for Wisconsin.
 See 0820
 Site Enforcement Tracking System  (SETS):
 PRP Listing by Site for Wisconsin.
 See 0821
 Site Enforcement Tracking System  (SETS):
 PRP Listing by Site for Wyoming.
 See 0822
 Site Enforcement Tracking System  (SETS):
, PRP Listing by Site for Wyoming.
 See 0823
 Site Enforcement  Tracking System (SETS):
 PRP Listing by Site for Wyoming:
 See 0824
 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
 PRP National  Frequency  by Party Name,
 January 22, 1992.
 See 0825
 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
 PRP National  Listing Alphabetically by Party
 Name.
 See 0826
 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
 PRP National  Listing Alphabetically by Party
 Name.
 See 0827
 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
 PRP National Listing Alphabetically by Party
 Name.
 See 0828
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
 PRP National Listing Alphabetically by Party
Name.
See 0829
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP National Listing Alphabetically by Party
Name, January 22, 1992.
See 0831
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP National Listing by Site.
See 0832
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP National Listing by Site.
See 0833
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP National Listing by Site.
See 0834
 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
 PRP National Listing by Site.
 See 0835
 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
 PRP National Listing  by  Site,  January  22,
 1992.
 See 0837
 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
 PRP Report by Site for Region 1, September
 26, 1991.
 See 0838
 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
 PRP Report by Site for Region 2, September
 26, 1991.
 See 0839
 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
 PRP Report by Site for Region 3, September
 26, 1991.
 See 0840
 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
 PRP Report by Site for Region 4, September
 26, 1991.
 See 0841
 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
 PRP Report by Site for Region 5, September
 26, 1991.
 See 0842
 Site Enforcement Tracking System  (SETS):
 PRP Report by Site for Region 6, September
 26, 1991.
 See 0843
 Site Enforcement Tracking System  (SETS):
 PRP Report by Site for Region 7, September
 26, 1991.
 See 0844
 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
 PRP Report by Site for Region 9, September
 26, 1991.
 See 0846
 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
 PRP Report by Site for Region 10,  Septem-
 ber 26, 1991.
 See 0847
 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
 PRP Site Listing by Site for Virginia.   '
 See 0848
 Site Enforcement  Tracking System  (SETS)
 (Region 1-31/2 Inch Diskette IBM PS/2
 Compatible) (for Microcomputers).
 See 0849
 Site Enforcement Tracking System  (SETS)
 (Region 2-31/2 Inch Diskette IBM PS/2
 Compatible) (for Microcomputers).
 See 0851
 Site Enforcement Tracking System  (SETS)
 (Region 3-31/2 Inch Diskette IBM PS/2
 Compatible) (for Microcomputers).
 See 0853
 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)
 (Region 4-31/2 Inch Diskette IBM PS/2
 Compatible) (for Microcomputers).
 See 0855
 Site Enforcement Tracking  System (SETS)
 (Region 5-31/2 Inch Diskette IBM PS/2
 Compatible) (for Microcomputers).
 See 0857
 Site Enforcement Tracking  System (SETS)
 (Region  6-31/2 Inch Diskette IBM PS/2
 Compatible) (for Microcomputers).
 See 0859
 Site Enforcement Tracking  System (SETS)
 (Region  7-3  1/2 Inch Diskette  IBM PS/2
 Compatible) (for Microcomputers).
See 0861
Site Enforcement Tracking System  (SETS)
(Region  8-31/2 Inch Diskette IBM PS/2
Compatible) (for Microcomputers).
See 0863
                                                                                                                           SU-17

-------
DNA DAMAGE
                                                       SUBJECT INDEX
    Site Enforcement Tracking System  (SETS)
    (Region 9-31/2 Inch Diskette IBM PS/2
    Compatible) (for Microcomputers).
    See 0865
  :  Sit* Enforcement Tracking System  (SETS)
    (Region 10 - 3 1/2 Inch Diskette IBM PS/2
    Compatible) (for Microcomputers).
    See 0887
DNA DAMAGE
  I  Evaluation of Exposure Markers.
    See 1246
    Using the DNA Alkaline Unwinding Assay to
    Detect DNA Damage In Laboratory and Envi-
    ronmentally Exposed Cells and Tissues.
    Sea 1368
DNA UNWINDING PROTEINS
    Using, tha DNA Alkaline Unwinding Assay to
    Detect DNA Damage in Laboratory and Envi-
  	 ronmenlatly Exposed Cells and Tissues.
  :: Saa 136«	
DOCUMENTATION
    CERCLIS  Data   Handling Support  Policy
    Statement
    So«Q013
    Continuous Release-Emergency Response
    Notification System and Priority Assessment
    Model; Model Documentation.
  :	See 1143
DOCUMENTS
    Design Considerations for Ambient Air Mom-
  s''- torirtg at Superfund Sites. Engineering Bulle-
  •	"tin;
    See 1402
    Engineering Bulletins:  Aids to the Develop-
  "„  rnefii of Remedial Alternatives.
  |^3ew 1236
DREDGE SPOIL
    SITE Demonstration of the CF  Systems Or-
  •  ganfcs Extraction System.
    S« 1301
DREDGING
    Framework for Real-Time Decision-Making:
    New Bedford Harbor  Pilot Dredging Study.
    See 1587
    Application of 'Real-Time' Monitoring in De-
  '": tislon Making:  The  New Bedford  Harbor
    Pitot Dredging Project.
    See 1574
    Development  and  Use  of  Site-Specific
    Chemical and Biological Criteria for Assess-
  '  ing New Bedford  Harbor  Pilot  Dredging
  :  Project
  	 See, 1583
 DRiNKING WATER
    ARARs  Q's and A's Compliance with  New
  i  ! SDWA National Primary Drinking Water Reg-
    ulations  for  Organic and  Inorganic Chemi-
  	' cals.
    See 0400	
    Compendium  of Federal  Rnancial Assist-
    ance  Programs:  Targeting  Programs for
    State and Local Ground-Water Protection.
    See 1435
     Remediation Completed: But Is the Ground-
    water Meeting tha Safe Drinking Water Act
     Requirements.  Haztech   International  90.
     Held in  Houston, Texas on May 8-10, 1990.
  :-,! See 1473
 DRUG FREE WORK PLACE ACT
  ij,, Dobarmont and Suspension.
    .                     n
 rifiUG INDUSTRY
   ":'Guidelines for the Cleanup of Clandestine
     Drug Laboratories.
     See 1007

 SU-18
DRUGS
    Guidelines  for the Cleanup  of  Clandestine
    Drug Laboratories.
    See 1007
DRUMS  (CONTAINERS)
    Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Clean-
    up Efforts Nationwide, Fall 1992. (Valley of
    the Drums, Bullitt County, Kentucky).
    See 0947
DUPONT/OBERLIN MICROFILTRATION
TREATMENT
    Technology   Demonstration    Summary,
    DuPont/Oberlin Miorofiltration System, Pai-
    merton, Pennsylvania. April-May  1992.
    See 1336
    Technology Evaluation Report:  SITE Pro-
    gram Demonstration of the  DuPont/Oberlin
    Microfiltration Technology.
    See 1350
DUPONT/OBERLIN MICROFILTRATION
TREATMENT SYSTEM
    DuPont/Oberlin  Microfiltration  Technology.
    Applications Analysis Report.
    See 1584
    Demonstration of Microfiltration  Technology.
    See 1228
EARTH  FILLS
    Conducting Remedial Investigations/Feasi-
    bility Studies  for CERCLA Municipal Landfill
    Sites.
    See 1084
    Guidance  Documents Relating  to Landfills
    and Contaminants.
    See 1259
    international  Waste Technologies/Geo-Con
    In  situ  Stabilization/Solidification: Applica-
    tions Analysis Report.
    See 1557
    Streamlining the RI/FS for CERCLA Munici-
    pal  Landfill Sites.
    See 1118
    Streamlining the RI/FS for CERCLA Munici-
    pal  Landfill Sites.
    See 1119
    Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Clean-
    up Efforts Nationwide, Spring 1993 (Powers-
    ville Site Profile, Peach County,  Georgia).
    See 0958
    Technology Evaluation Report:  International
    Waste Technologies/Geo-Con In situ Stabili-
    zation/Solidification.   Volume  3.  Update
    Report.
    See 1567
    Technology Evaluation Report:  International
    Waste Technologies/Geo-Con In situ Stabili-
    zation/Solidification.   Volume  4.  Update
    Report.
    See 1568
 ECOLOGY
    ECO Update: Ecological Assessment of Su-
    perfund  Sites.  An  Overview.  Volume  1,
    Number 2, December 1991.
    See 1019
    ECO Update: The Role of BTAGs in Ecologi-
    cal Assessment. Volume 1, Number 1, Sep-
    tember  1991.
    See 1020
    ECO Update. Volume 1, Number 4. Develop-
    ing a Work Scope  for Ecological Assess-
    ments.
    See 1022
     ECO Update. Volume 1, Number 5, August
     1992. Briefing the STAG: Initial Description
    of  Setting, History, and  Ecology of a Site.
     See 1023
   Ecological Risk Assessment Methods: A
   Review and Evaluation of Past Practices in
   the Superfund and RCRA (Resource Conser-
   vation and Recovery Act) Programs (Execu-
   tive Summary Included).
   See 1024
   Ecological Risk  Management in the Super-
   fund and RCRA (Resource Conservation and
   Recovery Act) Programs.
   See 1025
   Nature and Extent of Ecological Risks at Su-
   perfund  Sites and RCRA (Resource Conser-
   vation and Recovery Act) Facilities (Execu-
   tive Summary Included).
   See 1080
   Risk Assessment Guidance  for Superfund.
   Volume  2. Environmental Evaluation Manual.
   See 1072
   Summary of Ecological Risks, Assessment
 •  Methods, and Risk Management Decisions
   in Superfund and RCRA (Resource Conser-
   vation and Recovery Act).
   See 1077
ECONOMIC ANALYSIS
   Estimation of the  Cost of  Using  Chemical
   Protective Clothing.
   See 1244
ECONOMIC ASSISTANCE
   Compendium of Federal  Financial  Assist-
   ance  Programs: Targeting  Programs  for
   State and Local Ground-Water Protection.
   See 1435
ECOSYSTEMS
   Ecosystem Effects of Superfund.  National
   Priority  List Sites in Industrial Landscapes: A
   Framework for Policy Decisions.
   See 0135
ELDERLY PERSONS
   Community Relations: Use of Senior  Envi-
    ronmental Employees in Superfund (Super-
   fund Management Review: Recommendation
   43.K.L).
    See 0088
ELECTRIC  BATTERIES
    Control Technologies for  Remediation  of
    Contaminated Soil  and Waste  Deposits at
    Superfund Lead Battery Recycling Sites.
    See 1221
ELECTROACOUSTIC WAVES
    Development of Electro-Acoustic Soil  De-
    contamination (ESD) Process for In situ Ap-
    plications.
    See 1498
ELECTROCOAGULATION
    Alternating  Current  Electrocoagulation for
    Superfund Site Remediation.
    See 1192
 ELECTRODYNAMICS
    Use of Electrokinetics for Hazardous Waste
    Site Remediation.
    See 1366
 ELECTROKINETICS
    Removal of Radionuclides by Electrokinetic
    Soil Processing.
    See 1531
 ELECTROLYTIC RESPIROMETRY
    Respirometric Methods for Determination  of
    Biodegradability and Biodegradation Kinetics
    for   Hazardous Organic  Pollutant   Com-
    pounds.
    See 1427

-------
                                                       SUBJECT INDEX
                                                                                                     ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
 EMERGENCIES
     Communicating with the Public About Haz-
     ardous  Materials: An Examination of Local
     Practice. Risk Communication Series.
     See 0464
     Emergency  Response  Cleanup  Services
     Contracts (ERGS). Users Manual.
     See 0024
     National Oil and Hazardous Substances Pol-
     lution Contingency Plan (The NCP).
     See 0146
 EMERGENCY PLANNING
     Superfund Emergency Response Actions: A
     Summary  of Federally-Funded  Removals.
     Fifth Annual Report - Fiscal Year 1990.
     See 0313
     Superfund Emergency Response Actions: A
     Summary of  Federally Funded  Removals.
     Fourth Annual Report - Fiscal Year 1989
     See 0314
     Superfund Emergency Response Actions: A
     Summary  of  Federally-Funded  Removals.
     Sixth Annual Report, Fiscal  Year 1991.
     See 0315
 EMERGENCY PLANS
     Superfund Emergency Response Actions: A
     Summary of  Federally Funded  Removals.
     Volume 3.
     See 0318
 EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS
     Health and Safety Audit Guidelines: SARA
     Title I, Section 126.
     See 0916
 EMERGENCY RESPONSE NOTIFICATION
 SYSTEM
     CERCLA  Notifications:  Emergency  Re-
    sponse  Notification   System  (ERNS) Fact
    Sheet.
    See 0926
    Continuous Release-Emergency  Response
    Notification System and Priority Assessment
    Model: Model Documentation.
    See 1143
    Continuous Release-Emergency  Response
    Notification System and Priority Assessment
    Model: User's Manual for EPA Regions.
    See 1144
    Emergency Response Notification System.
    See 0927
    Oil Notifications: Emergency Response Noti-
    fication System (ERNS) Fact Sheet.
    See 0930
    Overview of ERNS: Emergency  Response
    Notification System (ERNS) Fact Sheet.
    See 0935
EMERGENCY RESPONSE PROGRAM
    Superfund Emergency Response Actions: A
    Summary of   Federally-Funded  Removals.
    Fifth Annual Report - Fiscal Year 1990.
    See 0313
EMERGENCY SERVICES
    Emergency Responders Agreements   for
    Fund-Lead Remedial Actions.
    See 1001
EMISSION FACTORS
    Air/Superfund National Technical  Guidance
    Study Series.   Database of  Emission Rate
    Measurement Projects.
    See 1379
    Air/Superfund  National Technical  Guidance
    Study Series.  Emission  Factors for Super-
    fund Remediation Technologies.
    See 1381
    Evaluation of  Emission Factors for Formal-
    dehyde from Certain Wood Processing Oper-
    ations. Final Report, May-August 1989.
    See 1410
 EMISSION RATES
     Air/Superfund National Technical Guidance
     Study Series. Development of Example Pro-
     cedures for  Evaluating the Air  Impacts of
     Soil Excavation  Associated with Superfund
     Remedial Actions.
     See 1380
 EMISSIONS
     Air/Superfund National Technical Guidance
     Study  Series.  Models for Estimating  Air
     Emission Rates from Superfund Remedial
     Actions.
     See 1388
 ENCAPSULATING
     Technology Evaluation Report SITE Program
     Demonstration Test, HAZCON Solidification,
     Douglassville, Pennsylvania Volume 1.
     See 1569
 ENCAPSULATION
     Description of EPA SITE  Demonstration of
     the  HAZCON Stabilization Process at  the
     Douglassville, Pennsylvania Superfund Site.
     See 1552
     SITE Demonstration of the CHEMFIX Solidi-
    fication/Stabilization Process at the Portable
     Equipment Salvage Company Site.
    See 1559
 ENDANGERMENT ASSESSMENT
     Endangerment Assessment Guidance.
    See 0527
 ENVIRONMENT MANAGEMENT
    Recent Advances in Risk Reduction Engi-
    neering.
    See 1064
 ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING
    AutoMOUSE:   An   Improvement   to  the
    MOUSE Computerized Uncertainty Analysis
    System Operational Manual.
    See 1201
 ENVIRONMENTAL EXPOSURE
    Communicating with the Public About Haz-
    ardous  Materials: An Examination of Local
    Practice. Risk Communication Series.
    See 0464
    Superfund Fact Sheet: Benzene.
    See 0489
    Superfund Fact Sheet: PCBs.
    See 0492
    Superfund Fact Sheet: Trichloroethylene.
    See 0496
ENVIRONMENTAL EXPOSURE PATHWAY
    Air/Superfund National Technical Guidance
    Study Series.  Volume 1.  Overview  of Air
    Pathway Assessments for Superfund Sites
    (Revised).
    See 1391
    Superfund Fact Sheet: Exposure Pathways.
    See 0393
ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH
    Health Effects Assessment  for Benzene.
    See 1035
    Health Effects Assessment  for Cadmium.
    See 1036
    Health Effects Assessment for  Carbon Tet-
    rachloride.
    See 1037
    Health Effects Assessment  for Chlordane.
    See 1038
    Health Effects Assessment for Chloroben-
    zene.
    See 1039
    Health Effects Assessment for Chloroform.
    See 1040
    Health Effects  Assessment for DDT.
    See 1041
    Health Effects Assessment for Methyl Ethyl
    Ketone.
    See 1042
     Health Effects Assessment  for Methylene
     Chloride.
     See 1043
     Health Effects Assessment for Naphthalene.
     See 1044
     Health Effects Assessment for Phenol.
     See 1045
     Health Effects Assessment for Styrene.
     See 1046
     Health Effects Assessment for Tetrachlor-
     oethylene.
     See 1047
     Health Effects Assessment for Trichloroethy-
     lene.
     See 1048
     Health Effects Assessment for Xyienes.
     See 1049
     Health Effects Assessment for 2,4,5-Trichlor-
     ophenoxy Acetic Acid (2,4,5-T).
     See 1050
     Supplemental Guidance to RAGS: Calculat-
     ing  the  Concentration Term.  Volume  1,
     Number 1, May 1992.
     See 1079
     Updated Health Effects Assessment for Ace-
     tone.
     See 1080
 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENTS
     Assessing Potential Indoor Air  Impacts for
     Superfund Sites.  Air/Superfund  National
    Technical Guidance Study Series.
     See 1395
    AutoMOUSE:  An   Improvement  to  the
     MOUSE Computerized Uncertainty Analysis
    System Operational Manual.
    See 1201
    Health   Effects   Assessment   Summary
    Tables.
    See 1051
    Health   Effects   Assessment   Summary
    Tables.
    See 1052
    Health   Effects   Assessment   Summary
    Tables.
    See 1053
    Health Effects Assessment Summary Tables
    Fourth Quarter FY 1989.
    See 1054
    Preliminary  Ranking   Evaluation   Score
    (PREscore) Version 1.1 (for  Microcomput-
    ers).
    See 0372
    On-Site Methods for Assessing Chemical
    Impact on the Soil Environment Using Earth-
    worms:  A Case Study at the  Baird and
    McGuire Superfund Site, Holbrook,  Massa-
    chusetts.
    See 1521
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
    Air/Superfund National Technical Guidance
    Study Series:  Estimation of Air Impacts for
    Soil Vapor Extraction (SVE) Systems.
    See 1383
    CERCLA (Comprehensive Environmental Re-
    sponse, Compensation  and  Liability  Act)
    Compliance with Other Laws Manual: Part 2.
    Clean Air Act and Other Environmental Stat-
    utes and State Requirements.
    See 0413
    Evaluating Amphibian Responses in Wet-
    lands Impacted  by  Mining  Activities in  the
    Western United States.
    See 1586
                                                                                                                        SU-19

-------
ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES
ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES
    ^armpdzafton of QA  Procedures for Envi-
    fen'mpntal Data Operations: Development of
    a National Consensus Standard for Quality
    Assurance for Environmental Programs.
    Sea 0989
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
    Future of Expert Systems In the Environmen-
    tal Protection Agency.
    Sae 1257
ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING
    SnvironmantaJ  Monitoring  'Methods Index
    (EMMI).  Version  1.0  (5 - User LAN)  (for
    Microcomputers).
    SM123B
    Environmental  Monitoring  Methods Index
    (EMMI), Version 1.0 (for Microcomputers).
    Sea 1239
    Environmental  Monitoring  Methods Index
    (EMM!),  Version  W (Unlimited  User  LAN)
    ((or Microcomputers).
    Sea 1240
    International Symposium on Reid Screening
    Methods for Hazardous Wastes and Toxic
    Chemicals (2nd), Proceedings. Held in Las
    Vegas, Nevada on February 12-14,1991.
    Sea 1279
    Asymmetric Loss Function for Superfund Re-
    m
-------
                                                         SUBJECT INDEX
                                                                                                                          FACILITIES
 EPA REGION 2
     Notification of Hazardous Waste Sites Re-
     quired Under Section 103(c) of the Compre-
     hensive Environmental Response, Compen-
     sation and Liability Act (CERCLA) of 1980-
     EPA Region 2.
     See 1175
     Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)-
     PRP Listing by Site for Region 2.
     See 0743
     Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
     PRP Report by Site for Region 2, September
     26, 1991.
     See 0839
     Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)
     (Region 2-3 1/2 Inch Diskette IBM PS/2
     Compatible) (for Microcomputers).
     See 0851
 EPA REGION 3
     Notification of Hazardous Waste Sites  Re-
     quired Under Section  103(c) of the Compre-
     hensive Environmental Response, Compen-
     sation  and Liability Act (CERCLA) of 1980:
     EPA Region 3.
     See 1176
     Site Enforcement Tracking  System (SETS):
     PRP Listing by Site for Region 3.
     See 0748
     Site Enforcement Tracking  System (SETS):
     PRP Report by Site for Region 3, September
     26, 1991.
     See 0840
     Site Enforcement Tracking  System (SETS)
 •    (Region 3-31/2 Inch  Diskette  IBM PS/2
     Compatible) (for Microcomputers).
     See 0853
 EPA REGION 4
     Environmental Compliance Branch, Standard
     Operating Procedures and Quality Assurance
     Manual, Revision  1.
     See 0535
     Notification  of Hazardous Waste  Sites Re-
    quired Under Section 103(c) of the Compre-
     hensive Environmental Response, Compen-
    sation and  Liability Act (CERCLA) of 1980:
    EPA Region 4.
    See 1177
    Site Enforcement Tracking System  (SETS):
    PRP Listing by Site for Region 4.
    See 0752
    Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
    PRP Report by Site for Region 4, September
    26, 1991.
    See 0841
    Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)
    (Region 4-31/2 Inch Diskette IBM PS/2
    Compatible) (for Microcomputers).
    See 0855
EPA REGION 5
    Notification of Hazardous Waste Sites  Re-
    quired Under Section 103(c)  of the Compre-
    hensive Environmental Response, Compen-
    sation and  Liability Act (CERCLA) of 1980:
    EPA Region 5.
    See 1178
    Site Enforcement  Tracking System (SETS)-
    PRP Listing by Site for Region 5.
    See 0757
    Site Enforcement  Tracking System (SETS):
    PRP Report by Site for Region 5, September
    26, 1991.
    See 0842
    Site Enforcement  Tracking System (SETS)
    (Region 5 -  3 1/2 Inch Diskette IBM PS/2
    Compatible) (for Microcomputers).
    See 0857
  EPA REGION 6
     Notification of Hazardous Waste Sites  Re-
     quired Under Section 103(c) of the Compre-
     hensive Environmental Response, Compen-
     sation and Liability Act (CERCLA) of 1980:
     EPA Region 6.
     See 1179
     Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
     PRP Listing by Site for Region 6.
     See 0762
     Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
     PRP Report by Site for Region 6, September
     26, 1991.
     See 0843
     Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)
     (Region  6-3 1/2 Inch Diskette  IBM PS/2
     Compatible) (for Microcomputers).
     See 0859
 EPA REGION 7
     Notification of Hazardous  Waste  Sites Re-
     quired Under Section 103(c) of the Compre-
     hensive  Environmental  Response, Compen-
     sation and Liability Act (CERCLA) of 1980:
     EPA Region 7.
     See 1180
     Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
     PRP Listing by Site for Region 7.
     See 0767
     Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
     PRP Report by Site for Region 7, September
     26, 1991.
     See 0844
     Site Enforcement Tracking System  (SETS)
     (Region 7-31/2 Inch Diskette IBM PS/2
     Compatible) (for Microcomputers).
     See 0861
 EPA REGION 8
     Notification of Hazardous Waste Sites  Re-
     quired Under Section 103(c) of the Compre-
     hensive Environmental Response,  Compen-
     sation and  Liability Act (CERCLA) of 1980:
     EPA Region 8.
     See 1181
     Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
     PRP Listing by Site for Region 8.
     See 0772
     Site Enforcement  Tracking System (SETS)
     (Region 8-31/2 Inch Diskette IBM PS/2
     Compatible) (for Microcomputers).
     See 0863
 EPA REGION 9
     Notification  of  Hazardous Waste Sites Re-
     quired Under Section 103(c) of the Compre-
     hensive Environmental  Response,  Compen-
     sation and  Liability Act  (CERCLA)  of  1980:
     EPA Region 9.
     See 1182
     Site  Enforcement Tracking  System (SETS):
     PRP Listing  by Site for Region 9.
    See 0777
    Site  Enforcement Tracking  System (SETS):
    PRP Report by Site for Region 9, September
    26, 1991.
    See 0846
    Site  Enforcement Tracking  System (SETS)
    (Region 9-3 1/2 Inch  Diskette IBM  PS/2
    Compatible) (for Microcomputers).
    See 0865
EQUIPMENT
    Reid Standard Operating Procedures for the
    Decontamination  of  Response  Personnel
    F.S.O.P. No. 7.
    See 0913
EQUIPMENT SPECIFICATIONS
    Specifications  and Guidance  for Contami-
    nant-Free Sample Containers.
    See 0994
  ERNS SYSTEM
     Emergency Response Notification System.
     See 0927
  ETHYLENE/TRICHLORO
     Superfund Fact Sheet: Trichloroethylene.
     See 0496
  EXCAVATION
     Air/Superfund National Technical Guidance
     Study Series. Development of Example Pro-
     cedures for Evaluating the Air Impacts of
     Soil Excavation  Associated with  Superfund
     Remedial Actions.
     See 1380
  EXPEDITED RESPONSE ACTION
     Expedited Response Actions.
     See 1003
  EXPERT SYSTEMS
     Future of Expert Systems in the Environmen-
     tal Protection Agency.
     See 1257
     PAST: The Potential ARARs Selection Tool.
     See 0434
 EXPOSURE
     Risk Assessment Guidance for Superfund.
     Volume 1. Human Health Evaluation Manual.
     Supplemental Guidance: 'Standard  Default
     Exposure Factors'.
     See 1071
     SARA  (Superfund Amendments and  Reau-
     thorization Act) Section 313 Roadmaps Data
     Base. User's Manual. Version 2.10.
     See 0304
 EXTRACTION
     Applications Analysis Report: SITE Program,
     CF  Systems Organics  Extraction  System,
     New Bedford, Massachusetts.
     See  1196
     Citizen's Guide to Solvent Extraction.
     See 0459
     Evaluation of Ground-Water Extraction Rem-
     edies: Phase 2. Volume 1. Summary Report.
     See  1444
     Evaluation of Ground-Water Extraction Rem-
     edies: Phase 2. Volume 2. Case Studies and
     Updates.
     See 1445
     Evaluation of Ground-Water Extraction Rem-
     edies. Volume 2. Case Studies 1-19.
     See 1446
     Evaluation of Ground-Water Extraction Rem-
     edies. Volume 3. General Site Data:  Data
     Base Reports.
     See 1447
     In situ Soil Vapor Extraction Treatment
     See 1511
     In situ Steam Extraction Treatment.
     See 1512
     Literature Review Summary  of Metals Ex-
    traction Processes Used  to  Remove Lead
    from  Soils.
    See 1518
    Evaluating  the  Effectiveness   of Ground
    Water Extraction Systems.
    See 1443
    Terra Vac In situ Vacuum Extraction System:
    Applications Analysis  Report
    See 1355
EXXON VALDEZ
    Exxon Valdez Oil Spill. A  Report to the
    President.
    See 0928
FACILITIES
    CERCLA Off-Site Policy - Eligibility of Facili-
    ties in Assessment Monitoring.
    See 0414
                                                                                                                           SU-21

-------
FAP1UTIES MANAGEMENT
                                                       SUBJECT INDEX
    Compendium of Federal Facilities Directives,
    1984 and 1985.
   |Se« 0696      ,,;
FACILITIES MANAGEMENT
    Facility Response Plans.
    See 0929
FACILITY RESPONSE PLAN
    Facility Response Plans.
    See 0929
FCfS (FIELD CERTIFICATION TRACKING
SYSTEM)
    FJaid Certification Tracking System (FCTS).
    User's Guide, Version 2.1.
    Sea 0909
FEASIBILITY
   I Guidance (or  Evaluating the Technical Im-
   , practicability of Ground-Water Restoration.
    Se«1460
FEDERAL AGENCIES
    Harmonization of QA Procedures for Envi-
    ronmental Data Operations:  Development of
    a National Consensus Standard for Quality
    Assurance for Environmental Programs.
    Sea 0989
FEDERAL BUDGETS
   	Accessing the $50 Million Set-Aside in the
    Remedial Action Budget for Quick Response
    at National Priorities List Sites.
   	Sa«1082
FEDERAL FACILITIES
    Guidance for  Federal Facilities on Release
    Nojftoatkm  Requirements  under  CERCLA
    and SARA TiUelii;
    Sea 0898
FEDERAL GOVERNMENT
   • Compendium of Federal Facilities Directives,
   :: 1964 and 198&	
   "" So° °896
FEDERAL'LAW   '  	"
    Dobarmont and Suspension.
    See 0470
FILTRATION
   	 Membrane  Treatment of Wood  Preserving
    Sfte Groundwater by SBP Technologies, Inc.
    Applications Analysis Report
   	 See 1468     ,  „
    Engineered Btofilter for Removing Organic
    Contaminants in Air.
    Sea 1403
    RHratton of  Ground  Water Samples  for
    Metals Analysis.
    See 1454
    StTE Program  Demonstration of the SBP
    Technologies,  Inc.,  Membrane  Filtration
    System on Creosote-Contaminated Water.
    See 1592
    Site Emerging Technologies: Bioscrubber for
   ;  Removing  Hazardous  Organic  Emissions
   1 from Soft,  Water  and Air  Decontamination
     Processes.
   Ii::S«1302     	
 FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE
     Suporfund   Technical   Assistance   Grant
     (TAG) Handbook: Applying  for Your Grant.
     See 0500
   '  Supertax!   Technical   Assistance   Grant
   !  (TAG)  Handbook: The  Application  Forms
     wMh Instructions.
     Sw0501
 FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT
   i,:•' Site Enforcement Tracking  System  (SETS):
   !	l!l National PRP Osting Alphabetically  by PRP
     Name.
     SCO 0616
     Sfte Enforcement Tracking System  (SETS):
     PRP Listing by Site for Region 1.
     Se«b739
   Site  Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
   PRP Listing by Site for Region 2.
   See 0744
   Site  Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
   PRP Listing by Site for Region 4.
   See 0753
   Site  Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
   PRP Listing by Site for Region 5.
   See 0758
   Site  Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
   PRP Listing by Site for Region 6.
   See 0763
   Site  Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
   PRP Listing by Site for Region 7.
   See 0768
   Site  Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
   PRP Listing by Site for Region 8.
   See  0773
   Site  Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
   PRP Listing by Site for Region 10.
   See 0783
FINANCING
    Evaluating Mixed Funding Settlements under
    CERCLA.
    See 0537
    Interim Policy on Mixed Funding Settlements
    Involving the Preauthorization  of States or
    Political Subdivisions.
    See 0566
FIRE DEPARTMENTS
    Hazmat Team Planning Guidance.
    See 0915
FLORIDA
    National Priorities List Sites: Florida.
    See 0174
    National Priorities List Sites: Florida.
    See 0175
    National Priorities List Sites: Florida, 1992.
    See 0176
    Site  Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
    PRP Listing by Site for Florida.
    See 0645
    Site  Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
    PRP Listing by Site for Florida.
    See 0646
    Site  Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
    PRP Listing by Site for Florida.
    See 0647
FOAM
    Foam Scrubbing (Chapter 9).
    See  1411
FOAM SCRUBBING
    Foam Scrubbing (Chapter 9).
    See 1411
FOREIGN TECHNOLOGY
    Assessment  of International  Technologies
    for  Superfund   Applications:  Technology
    Review and Trip Report Results.
    See 1197
    International Evaluation of In-situ Biorestora-
    tion  of Contaminated Soil and Groundwater
    (September 1990)~Translation.
    See 1517
    Toronto Harbour Commissioners (THC) Soil
    Recycle Treatment Train. Applications Analy-
    sis Report.
    See 1544
 FORMALDEHYDE
    Evaluation of Emission  Factors  for Formal-
    dehyde from Certain Wood Processing Oper-
    ations. Final Report, May-August 1989.
    See 1410
 FOURIER TRANSFORM SPECTROMETERS
    Use of a Fourier Transform Spectrometer as
    a Remote Sensor at Superfund Sites.
    See 1365
FRAUD
    Criminal  Investigations and  the  Superfund
    Program.
    See 0469
FUGITIVE EMISSIONS
    Foam Scrubbing (Chapter 9).
    See 1411
FULLERTOM (CALIFORNIA)
    Demonstration of a Trial Excavation at the
    McColl Superfund Site.
    See 1226
    Technology Evaluation Report: Site Program
    Demonstration of a Trial Excavation at the
    McColl Superfund Site.
    See 1349
FULTON (NEW YORK)
    Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Clean-
    up Efforts Nationwide, Spring 1993  (Fulton
    Terminals Site Profile, Oswego County, NY).
    See 0955
FUND-BALANCING WAIVERS
    ARARs  Q's and A's: The  Fund-Balancing
    Waiver.
    See 0403
FUNDS
    Debarment and Suspension.
    See 0470
    Political  Subdivision  Involvement in Super-
    fund.
    See 0480
GAS ANALYSIS
    Compendium of ERT Field Analytical Proce-
    dures.
    See 0902
GAS CHROMATOGRAPHY
    Evaluation of Portable Gas Chromatographs.
    See 1479
GAS INJECTION
    Accutech  Pneumatic Fracturing  Extraction
    and Hot Gas Injection, Phase 1. Applications
    Analysis Report.
    See 1190
 GENERATOR SETTLEMENTS
    Waiver of Concurrence on De Minlmis Gen-
    erator Settlements.
    See 0892
 GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEMS
    Summary of GIS Support to Superfund.
    See 1307
 GEORGIA
     National Priorities List Sites: Georgia.
     See 0177
     National Priorities List Sites: Georgia.
     See 0178
     National Priorities  List Sites: Georgia, 1992.
     See 0179
     Site Enforcement  Tracking System (SETS):
     PRP Listing by Site for Georgia.
     See 0648
     Site Enforcement  Tracking System (SETS):
     PRP Listing by Site for Georgia.
     See 0649
     Site Enforcement  Tracking System (SETS):
     PRP Listing by Site for Georgia.
     See 0650
     Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Clean-
     up Efforts Nationwide, Spring 1993 (Powers-
     ville Site Profile, Peach County, Georgia).
     See 0958
 GLYCOLIC ACID
     Innovative  Technology:  Glycolate  Dehalo-
     genation.
     See 1513
  SU-22

-------
                                                          SUBJECT INDEX
                                                                                                                      GROUND WATER
   GLYCOLS
      Citizen's Guide to Glycolate Dehalogenation
      See 0454
   GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES
      Compendium of Good Ideas: Models of Suc-
      cess  and  Lessons  Learned.  Volume  2
      Source Book.
      See 0134
   GOVERNMENT POLICIES
      Considerations  in  Ground-Water Remedi-
      ation at Superfund  Sites and RCRA Facili-
      ties: Update.
      See 1437
      Discussions with the Public Concerning NPL
      Listings.
      See 0339
      Evaluating Mixed Funding Settlements under
      CERCLA.
      See 0537
      Interim Policy on Mixed Funding Settlements
      Involving the Preauthorization of States or
      Political Subdivisions.
      See 0566
      NPL Construction Completion Definition at
      Bioremediation  and  Soil  Vapor  Extraction
      Sites.
      See 0365
      Policy Towards Owners of Residential Prop-
      erty at Superfund Sites.
     See 0587
      Presumptive  Remedies: Policy and  Proce-
     dures.
     See 1103
     RCRA, Superfund Monthly Hot Line Reports
     See 0303
     Revision  of  Policy  Regarding  Superfund
     Project Assignment between Alternative Re-
     medial Contracting Strategy Contractors and
     the US. Army Corps of Engineers.
     See 0068
     Superfund Policy Forum Update, Volume 1
     Number 1, February 1992.
     See 0324
 GRANTS
     Superfund Technical Assistance Grants Pro-
     gram: Regional Guidance Manual.
     See 0504
 GRANULAR ACTIVATED  CARBON
 TREATMENT
    Granular Activated Carbon Treatment. Engi-
    neering Bulletin.
    See 1258
GREAT LAKES
    Dealing with Toxic Polluted Sediments in the
    Great Lakes Basin.
    See 1582
GROUND WATER
    Air/Superfund  National Technical Guidance
    Study  Series.  Comparisons of Air  Stripper
    Simulations and Field Performance Data
    See 1376
    ARARs Q's and A's: State Ground-Water
    Antidegradation Issues.
    See 0402
    Basic Concepts of  Contaminant Sorption at
    Hazardous  Waste   Sites  (Ground Water
    Issue).
    See 1431
    CERCLA  Site Discharges to POTWs- Guid-
   ance Manual.
   See 1576
   Chemical  Enhancements to  Pump-and-Treat
   Remediation. Ground Water  Issue
   See 1434
   Compendium of ERT Groundwater Samplina
   Procedures.
   See 0903
    Compendium of  Federal Financial Assist-
    ance  Programs:  Targeting  Programs  for
    State and Local Ground-Water Protection
    See 1435
    Considerations  in  Ground-Water  Remedi-
    ation at Superfund Sites and RCRA Facili-
    ties: Update.
    See 1437
    Determining  Soil  Response  Action Levels
    Based on Potential Contaminant Migration to
    Ground Water: A Compendium of Examples
    See 1497
    Emerging Technologies: Bio-Recovery Sys-
   tems Removal and Recovery of Metal Ions
   from Groundwater.
   See 1439
   Emerging Technologies: Bio-Recovery  Sys-
   tems Removal and Recovery of Metal Ions
   from Groundwater. Appendices.
   See 1440
   Evaluation of Ground-Water Extraction Rem-
   edies: Phase 2. Volume 1. Summary Report.
   See 1444
   Evaluation of Ground-Water Extraction Rem-
   edies: Phase 2. Volume 2. Case Studies and
   Updates.
   See 1445
   Evaluation of Ground-Water Extraction Rem-
   edies. Volume 2. Case Studies 1-19
   See 1446
   Evaluation of Ground-Water Extraction Rem-
   edies. Volume 3.  General  Site Data: Data
   Base Reports.
   See 1447
   Evaluation  of Soil  Venting Application.
  Ground Water Issue.
  See 1505
  Evaluation  of  Unsaturated/Valdose  Zone
  Models for Superfund Sites.
  See 1449
  Facilitated Transport. Series of Issue Papers
  (3rd).
  See 1451
  Forum  on  Innovative   Hazardous  Waste
  Treatment   Technologies:   Domestic  and
  International. Held in Atlanta, Georgia  on
  June 19-21, 1989. Abstract Proceedings.
  See 1252
  Ground-Water Issue: Characterizing Soils for
  Hazardous Waste Site Assessments
  See 1455
  Ground-Water  Issue: Potential Sources of
  Error in Ground-Water Sampling at Hazard-
  ous Waste Sites.
  See  1456
  Ground Water Sampling for Metals  Analyses.
  Superfund Ground Water Issue
 See  1459
 Guidance for Evaluating  the Technical Im-
 practicability of Ground-Water Restoration
 See 1460
 Guide on Remedial Actions for Contaminat-
 ed Ground Water.
 See 1461
 Identification  and Compilation of Unsaturat-
 ed/Vadose Zone Models.
 See 1464
 In-situ  Bioremediation  of  Contaminated
 Ground Water.
 See 1465
 In situ Steam Extraction Treatment.
 See 1512
 In situ Treatment of Contaminated Ground
 Water: An Inventory of Research and  Field
 Demonstrations and Strategies for Improving
 Ground Water Remediation Technologies.
See 1466
Innovative Treatment Technologies: Semi-
Annual Status Report (Fourth Edition).
See 1273
    International Evaluation of In-situ Biorestora-
    tion of Contaminated Soil and Groundwater
    (September 1990)-Translation.
    See 1517
    Methods for  Evaluating  the  Attainment of
    Cleanup  Standards.   Volume  2.  Ground
    Water.
    See 1469
    New Approach and Methodologies for Char-
    acterizing the  Hydrogeologic  Properties of
    Aquifers.
    See 1470
    Performance Evaluations of Pump-and-Treat
   Remediations.
   See 1471
   Potential Sources of Error in  Ground-Water
   Sampling  at Hazardous Waste  Sites. Ground
   Water Issue.
   See 1472
   Presentations   EPA-State  Soil   Standards
   Conference. Held in Crystal City, Virginia on
   January 29,1991.
   See 1524
   Remediation Completed: But Is the Ground-
   water Meeting the Safe Drinking Water Act
   Requirements.  Haztech  International  90.
   Held in Houston, Texas on May 8-10, 1990
   See 1473
   Advanced Oxidation Technologies for the
   Treatment of Contaminated Groundwater
   See 1429
   Biodegradation of Creosote and Pentachlor-
  ophenol  in   Contaminated  Groundwater:
  Chemical and Biological Assessment.
  See 1432
  Detoxification of Pentachlorophenol and Cre-
  osote Contaminated Groundwater by Physi-
  cal  Extraction: Chemical and Biological As-
  sessment.
  See 1438
  EPA Site Demonstration of BioTrol Aqueous
  Treatment System.
  See 1441
  Evaluating  the  Effectiveness  of  Ground
  Water Extraction Systems.
  See 1443
  Extraction  of  Mercury  from Groundwater
  Using Immobilized Algae.
  See 1450
  Field Demonstration  of the UV/Oxidation
  Technology to Treat Ground Water Contami-
  nated with VOCs.
  See  1452
  Field  Evaluation of the  UV/Oxidation Tech-
  nology to Treat Contaminated Groundwater.
 Proceedings of  the  National  Conference
 (10th). Held in Washington,  DC.  on Novem-
 ber 27-29, 1989.
 See 1453
 Filtration  of Ground  Water  Samples  for
 Metals Analysis.
 See 1454
 Remediation of Contaminated Soils by Sol-
 vent Flushing.
 See 1529
 ROD Annual Report, FY1991. Volume 1
 See 1113
 ROD Annual Report, FY1991. Volume 2.
 See 1114
 Subsurface Contamination Reference Guide
 See 1474
 Superfund Ground Water Issue: Accuracy of
 Depth  to Water  Measurements.  2nd  in
 Series of Issue Papers.
 See 1476
 Superfund Ground Water  Issue. Contaminant
Transport In Fractured  Media: Models for
 Decision Makers.
See 1477
                                                                                                                            SU-23

-------
GROUND WATER MOVEMENT
                                                       SUBJECT INDEX
    Supwfund Innovative Technology Evaluation
    (SITE) Program Evaluation Report for Antox
   i BTX Water Screen (BTX Immunoassay).
    St« 1320
    Supotfund  Remedial Action Decision  Proc-
   : «8s: Database for Selected FY87 Records of
    Decision,
    Sm»1136
    Tech Trends (Number 8).
    S««1328  .............
    Technology Evaluation Report: SITE  Pro-
    gram  Demonstration of the Ultrox  Interna-
    tional Ultraviolet  Radiation/Oxidation Tech-
    nology.
    Seo 1351
    Ultrox International Ultraviolet Radiation/Oxi-
    dation  Technology: Applications Analysis
    Report.
    Sea 1364
    Vandor  Information System for Innovative
    Treatment Technologies (VISITT). Number 1.
    Sea 1370
 GROUND WATER MOVEMENT
   ....... Ground-Water   Modeling    Compendium.
    Model Fact Sheets,  Descriptions,  Applica-
   - ilons and Assessment Framework.
    Soa 1458
 GROUNOWATER
    ROD Annual Report, FY 1990.
    See 1112
 GBOVELAND  (MASSACHUSETTS)
   : ....... Terra Vac In situ Vacuum Extraction System:
   ::: Applications Analysis Report.
     See 1356
          '               '
     National  Priorities  List  Sites:  American
     Samoa, Guam, and the Trust Territories.
     Sea 0154
     National  Priorities List  Sites:  The  United
   is  States Territories, 1992.
     See 0275
  GUAM AND tRUST TERRITORIES
     National  Priorities  List Sites:  American
     Samoa, Guam and Trust Territories.
     S«« 0155
  GUIDANCE
     Guidance on Oversight of  PRP  Performed
     RD/HA.
   ^ ........ Sea 1130
  dSilDEL'lNES
     Air/Superfund National Technical Guidance
   i  Study Series. Contingency  Plans at Super-
   ;  food Sites Using Air Monitoring.
     See 137S
     Assessing Reports of Continuous Releases
     of Hazardous Substances: A Guide for EPA
   is ....... Regions.
     Soe 1142
   ...... i CERCLA  Compliance  with   Other Laws
     Manual: CERCLA Compliance with the CWA
     and SOWA.
      Sea 0406
      CERCLA  Compliance  with   Other Laws
      Manual: Guide to Manual.
      See 0407
      Compliance with Third Third Requirements
      Under the LDRs, Superfund LDR Guide No.
      8.
      Sea 0418
      Data Quality  Objectives for  Remedial  Re-
   ::'  sponso Activities: Development Process. Ex-
      ample Scenario: RI/FS Activities at a Site
      with  Contaminated Soils and  Ground Water.
      Soe 0980
      Final Guidance on  Implementation of the
      'Consistency" Exemption to  the  Statutory
      limits on Removal Actions.
      See  1004
 Guidance  Documents Relating to Landfills
 and Contaminants.
 See 1259
 Guidance on EPA Oversight of Remedial De-
 signs  and Remedial Actions  Performed by
 Potentially Responsible Parties.
 See 1128
 Guidance  on Expediting Remedial  Design
 and Remedial Action.
 See 1129
 Guide on Remedial Actions  at  Superfund
 Sites  with  PCB Contamination.
 See 1262
 Guide to Delisting of RCRA Wastes for Su-
 perfund Remedial Responses.
 See 0422
 Guide to  Developing Superfund  Proposed
 Plans.
 See 1099
 Guide to Selecting Superfund Remedial Ac-
 tions.
  See 1100
  Interim RCRA/CERCLA Guidance on  Non-
  Contiguous  Sites  and On-Site Management
  on Waste and Treatment Residue.
  See 0427
  Obtaining a Soil and Debris Treatability Vari-
  ance for  Removal Actions. Superfund LDR
  Guide No. 6B.
  See  0430
  Quality Assurance/Quality Control Guidance
  for   Removal Activities: Sampling  QA/QC
  Plan and  Data Validation Procedures.
  See  0993
  Removal  Cost Management System: Version
  3.2.
  See  1009
  Risk Assessment Guidance  for Superfund.
  Volume 1. Human Health Evaluation Manual.
  Part A, April 1990.
  See 1066
  Sampler's Guide  to the Contract Laboratory
  Program.
  See 0071
  Scoper's Notes:  An RI/FS  Costing Guide.
  Bringing  in  a  Quality  RI/FS on Time and
  Within Budget.
  See 1117
  Superfund  LDR  Guide No.  1: Overview of
   RCRA Land Disposal Restrictions (LDRs).
   See 0440
   Superfund  LDR Guide No. 2: Complying with
   the  California  List Restrictions  under Land
   Disposal Restrictions (LDRs).
   See 0441
   Superfund  LDR  Guide  No. 3: Treatment
   Standards  and  Minimum Technology Re-
   quirements under Land Disposal Restrictions
   (LDRS).
   See 0442
   Superfund LDR Guide  No. 4: Complying with
   the Hammer  Restrictions under Land Dis-
   posal Restrictions (LDRs).
   See 0443
   Superfund  LDR  Guide No. 5: Determining
   When Land Disposal Restrictions (LDRs) Are
   'Applicable' to CERCLA Response Actions.
   See 0444
   Superfund  Removal   Procedures:  Action
   Memorandum Guidance.
   See 1012
GUIDES (INSTRUCTIONS)
   User's  Guide to Contract  Laboratory Pro-
   gram.
   See 0078
HABITABILITY
    Evaluating Amphibian Responses in  Wet-
    lands Impacted  by Mining  Activities  in the
   Western United States.
    See 1586
HALOGEN ORGANIC COMPOUNDS
    Chemical Dehalogenation Treatment: APEG
    Treatment.
    See 1210
HANDBOOKS
    Community Relations in Superfund: A Hand-
    book.
    See 0467
    Endangerment Assessment Handbook.
    See 0530
    Handbook:  Responding to Discharges  of
    Sinking Hazardous Substances.
    See 1589
    Superfund  Reauthorization: NACEPT  Sub-
    committee Handbook.
    See 0331
HAWAII
    National Priorities List  Sites: California and
    Hawaii.
    See 0163
    National Priorities List  Sites: California and
    Hawaii, 1992.
    See 0164
    National Priorities List Sites: Hawaii.
    See 0180
 HAZARD RANKING SYSTEM
    Closing the NPL Book under the  Original
    HRS.
    See 0337
    Hazard Ranking  System  Guidance  Manual.
    See 0346
    Hazard Ranking  System  Guidance  Manual.
    See 0347
     PA-Score  (Preliminary Assessment Score),
    Version 2.1,  3 1/2 inch  (for Microcomput-
    ers).
     See 0369
     PA-Score  (Preliminary Assessment Score),
     Version 2.1,  5  1/4 inch  (for Microcomput-
     ers).
     See 0370
     Preliminary   Ranking   Evaluation   Score
     (PREscore) Version  1.1   (for Microcomput-
     ers).
     See 0372
     Revised Hazard Ranking System: An Im-
     proved Tool  for Screening Superfund Sites.
     See 0377
     Revised  Hazard  Ranking  System:  Back-
     ground Information.
     See 0378
     Revised Hazard Ranking System: Qs and
     As.
     See 0381
  HAZARDOUS MATERIALS
     Abstract Proceedings: Forum on Innovative
     Hazardous Waste Treatment Technologies;
     Domestic  and International  (2nd).  Held  in
     Philadelphia,  Pennsylvania on  May 15-17,
     1990.
     See 1186
     Abstract  Proceedings: Superfund Technical
     Support Project General Meeting. Held  in
      Athens, Georgia on December 3-6, 1990.
      See 1187
      Accelerating  Potentially  Responsible  Party
      Remedial  Design Starts: Implementing the
      30-Day Study.
      See 0509
      Accessing Federal Data Bases  for Contami-
      nated Site Clean-Up Technologies.
      See 1188
      Accessing the $50  Million Set-Aside in the
      Remedial Action Budget for Quick Response
      at National Priorities List Sites.
      See 1082
   SU-24

-------
                                                       SUBJECT INDEX
                                                                                                          HAZARDOUS MATERIALS
   Achieving   Greater  Consistency   between
   Subjective and Objective Risks
   See 1017
   Administrative Guidance for the FIT to ARCS
   (FIT/ARCS) Transition.
   See 0017
   Administrative Order on Consent for Reme-
   dial Investigations/Feasibility Study
   See 0510
   Administrative Penalty Procedures
   See 0511
   Advancing  the Use of Treatment  Technol-
   ogies for Superfund Remedies
   See 1191
   Air/Superfund National Technical Guidance
   Series.  Superfund  Air Pathway  Analyses
   Review Criteria Checklists.
   See 1372
   Air/Superfund National  Technical Guidance
   Study  Series. Air  Emissions from  Area
   Sources:  Estimating  Soil  and   Soil-Gas
   Sample Number Requirements.
   See 1373
   Air/Superfund  National  Technical Guidance
   Study  Series:  Applicability of  Open  Path
   Monitors for Superfund
   See 1375
  Air/Superfund National Technical Guidance
  Study Series: Compilation of Information on
  Real-Time Air Monitoring for Use at Suoer-
  fund Sites.
  See 1377
  Air/Superfund National Technical Guidance
  Study Series: Estimation of Air Impacts for
  Soil Vapor Extraction (SVE) Systems.
  See 1383
  Air/Superfund National Technical Guidance
  Study Series: Evaluation of Short-Term  Air
  Action Levels for Superfund Sites.
  See 1386
  Air/Superfund National Technical Guidance
  Study Series. Volume 1. Application of Air
  Pathway Analyses  for Superfund Activities
  See 1390
  Air/Superfund National Technical Guidance
  Study Series. Volume 2. Estimation of Base-
  line  Air Emissions  at Superfund Sites (Re-
  vised).
  See 1392
  Air/Superfund National Technical Guidance
  Study Series. Volume 4. Guidance for Ambi-
  ent Air Monitoring at Superfund Sites (Re-
 vised).
 See 1393
 Air/Superfund National Technical Guidance
 Study Series. Volume 4. Procedures for Dis-
 persion Modeling and Air Monitoring  for Su-
 perfund Air Pathway Analysis.
 See 1394
 Amendment to Historical  Definitions of NPL
 Deletion Start and Completion Dates.
 See 0335
 American Combustion Pyretron  Destruction
 System. Applications Analysis Report.
 See 1193
 Analysis of State Superfund Programs: 50-
 State Study.
 See 0447
 Analysis of State Superfund Programs- 50-
 State Study, 1990 Update.
 See 0448
 Analysis of State Superfund Programs- 50-
State Study. 1991 Update.
See 0449
Annual RREL  Research Symposium  (20th)
Abstract  Proceedings.  Held  in  Cincinnati,
Ohio on March 15-17, 1994
See 1184
    Applicability of Land Disposal Restrictions to
    RCRA and CERCLA Ground Water Treat-
    ment  Reinjection  Superfund  Management
    Review: Recommendation No. 26
    See 1430
    Applications Analysis Report: Silicate Tech-
    nology Corporation's Solidification/Stabiliza-
    tion  Technology  for Organic and Inorganic
    Contaminants in Soils.
    See  1550
    Applications Analysis Report: SITE Program,
    CF Systems  Organics  Extraction  System
    New Bedford,  Massachusetts.
    See 1196
   Approval  of Long Term Contracting Strategy
   for  Superfund   (Superfund   Management
   Review: Recommendation E.2).
   See 0018
   ARAR's Q's and  A's. Compliance with  the
   Toxicity Characteristics Rule. Part 1.
   See 0396
   ARARs Fact  Sheet: Compliance  with  the
   Clean Air  Act and Associated Air Quality  Re-
   quirements.
   See 0397
   ARARs Q's and A's.
   See 0398
   ARARS Q's and A's: Compliance with Fed-
   eral Water Quality  Criteria.
   See 0399
   ARARs Q's and A's: General Policy, RCRA
   CWA,  SDWA,  Post-ROD Information, and
   Contingent Waivers.
   See 0401
   ARARs  Q's and  A's: State  Ground-Water
   Antidegradation Issues.
   See 0402
   ARARs  Q's and  A's: The Fund-Balancinq
  Waiver.
  See 0403
  Arbitration  Procedures for Small Superfund
  Cost Recovery Claims.
  See 0512
  ARCS (Alternative Remedial Contract Strate-
  gy) Contracts Users' Manual.
  See 0019
  ARCS  Construction  Contract  Modification
  Procedures.
  See 0020
  ARCS Work Assignment Management: Field
  Guide.
  See 0021
  Assessing  Potential Indoor Air Impacts for
  Superfund  Sites.  Air/Superfund  National
  Technical Guidance Study  Series
  See 1395
  Assessing Reports  of Continuous Releases
  of Hazardous Substances: A Guide for EPA
  Regions.
  See 1142
,  Assessment of  International Technologies
  for  Superfund   Applications:   Technology
  Review and Trip  Report Results.
  See  1197
 Assessment of Technologies for the Reme-
 diation  of Radioactively Contaminated Su-
 perfund Sites.
 See 1198
 Assessment of Tentatively Identified Com-
 pounds in Superfund Samples.
 See 1199
 Assurance of Hazardous  Waste  Capacity
 Guidance to State  Officials. Assistance in
 Fulfilling  the  Requirements  of  CERCLA
 104(c)(9).
 See 0129
 ATSDR   Health   Consultations   under
 CERCLA.
 See 1018
 Audits and the Superfund Program Manaqer
 See 0087
   Authority to Use  CERCLA to Provide En-
   forcement Funding Assistance to States.
   See 0450
   Authorization for Regional Administrators to
   Approve  Consistency  Exemptions  at  NPL
   Sites.
   See 0998
   AWD  Technologies  Integrated  AquaDetox
   (Trade Name)/SVE Technology: Applications
   Analysis Report.
   See 1202
   Babcock and Wilcox Cyclone Furnace Vitrifi-
   cation. Technology Demonstration Summary.
   See 1203
   Basic  Concepts of Contaminant Sorption at
   Hazardous  Waste  Sites  (Ground  Water
   Issue).
   See 1431
   Bibliography of Federal Reports and Publica-
   tions Describing Alternative and Innovative
   Treatment   Technologies  for  Corrective
   Action and Site Remediation.
   See 1206
   Bioremediation:  An Information Update  on
   Applying Bioremediation to Site Cleanup.
   See 1421
   Bioremediation in the Field. An Information
   Update on  Applying Bioremediation  to Site
   Clean-Up. Number 3.
  See 1422
  Bioremediation in the Field: An Information
  Update on  Applying Bioremediation to Site
  Cleanup. (Number 4).
  See 1423
  Bioremediation in the Field: Number 1, No-
  vember 1990.
  See 1424
  Carver-Greenfield Process  (Trade  Name)
  Dehydro-Tech  Corporation.   Applications
  Analysis Report.
  See 1207
  CERCLA Community Relations Mailing Lists.
  See 0451
  CERCLA  Compliance  with  Other  Environ-
  mental Statutes.
  See 0404
  CERCLA  Compliance  with Other   Laws
  Manual: CERCLA Compliance with the CWA
 and SDWA.
 See 0406
 CERCLA  Compliance  with Other   Laws
 Manual: Guide to Manual.
 See 0407
 CERCLA  Compliance   with  Other  Laws
 Manual: Overview of ARARs - Focus on
 ARAR Waivers.
 See 0408
 CERCLA  Compliance   with  Other  Laws
 Manual:  RCRA ARARS-Focus on  Closure
 Requirements.
 See 0410
 CERCLA Compliance with the RCRA Toxici-
 ty Characteristics (TC) Rule: Part 2.
 See 0412
 CERCLA Enforcement Policy Compendium
 Update.
 See 0516
 CERCLA Implementation  of the Training Re-
 quirements of EPA Order 3500.1. Inspector
 Training.
 See 0518
 CERCLA   Notifications:   Emergency   Re-
 sponse Notification  System  (ERNS)  Fact
 Sheet.
 See 0926
 CERCLA  Site  Discharges  to   POTWS
 CERCLA Site  Sampling  Program: Detailed
 Data Report.
See 1575
                                                                                                                         SU-25

-------
              HAZARDOUS MATERIALS
                                                                      SUBJECT INDEX
                  CERCLA Site Discharges to POTWS Treat-
                  ability Manual.
                  Sea 1577
                  CERCLA/Superfund Orientaflon Manual.
                  Seo0130
                  5ERCLA Waste Capacity Assurance.
                  fee 0131 ..................
                  SEROUS Characterization Project National
                  Results.
                  See 0001
                  CERCUS Characterization Project Region 1
                                   ..........
                  Sea 0002
                  CERCUS Characterization Project Region 2
                              '     ""    ""
                                   ,.,     „
                   Sao 0003
                   CERCUS Characterization Project: Region 3
                   Results.
                   See 0004
                   CERCUS Characterization Project Region 4
                   Results.
                   S000005
                   CERCUS Characterization Project Region 5
                   Results.
                   S«a0006
                   CERCUS Characterization Project Region 6
                   Results,
                  "sWOfJO? ...................
                   CERCUS Characterization Project: Region 7
                   Results.
                   Sao 0008
                   QERCUS Characterization Project Region 8
                  "'Metuits,
                   See 0009
                   CERCUS Characterization Project Region 9
                   Remits.
                   Sea 0010
                   CERCUS  Characterization  Project  Region
                   10 Results.
                   SN 0011
                   CERCJUS   (Comprehensive  Environmental
                   Response, Compensation, and Uability Infor-
                   malion System) Stte Location Extract.
                   Sea 0012
                   CERCUS  Listing.
                   Sea 0014
                   CERCUS  - WasteLAN - CleanLAN.
                   Ses 0015
                   Characterization   Protocol  for Radioactive
                   Contaminated Soils.
                    Sea 1484
                    Characterizing soils for  hazardous waste site
                    assessments.
                    See 1495
                    Chemftx  Tachnotogles, Inc.  Solidification/
                  1 Stabilization  Process.  Application  Analysis
                    Report.
                    See 1551
                  ;  Chamteal pahalpgenatlon  Treatability Stud-
                    ies under CERCTAt An  Overview.
                    Sea 1153
                    Chamicai Dehalogenaflon  Treatability Stud-
                    ies under CERCLA: An  Overview.
                    Sea 1209
                  :  Chsmfcal Oxidation  Treatment. Engineering
                    Bulletin.
                    Sea 1211
                    Citizen's Guide to Air Sparging.
                    So* 0452
                    Citizen's  Guide to Bioventing.
                    Sea 0453
                    Citizen's  Guide  to Glycolate Dehalogenation.
                    Sao 0454
                    Citizen's Guide  to How Innovative Treatment
                    Technologies Are Being  Successfully Ap-
                    plied  at Superiund Sites.
                    Sea 0455
                    Qllzon's Guide  to In situ Soil Flushing.
                  ' Se«0456""   ..... "
Citizen's  Guide  to  Innovative  Treatment
Technologies   for   Contaminated   Soils,
Sludges, Sediments and Debris.
See 0457
Citizen's Guide to Soil Washing.
See 0458
Citizen's Guide to Solvent Extraction.
See 0459
Citizen's Guide to Thermal Desorption.
See 0460
Citizen's Guide to Using Indigenous and Ex-
ogenous  Microorganisms in Bioremediation.
See 0461
Citizens' Guidance Manual for the Technical
Assistance Grant Program.
See 0462
Citizens' Guidance Manual for the Technical
Assistance Grant Program.
See 0463
Clarification of Delegation to Approve Con-
sistency Exemptions at NPL Sites.
See 0336
Cleaning Up the Nation's Waste Sites: Mar-
 kets and Technology Trends.
 See 0132
 Cleanup Information Bulletin Board System
 Users Guide. (CLU-IN: Cleanup Information
 Bulletin Board).
 See 1215
 Closing the NPL Book under the Original
 MRS.
 See 0337
 Communicating with the  Public About  Haz-
 ardous Materials: An  Examination of Local
 Practice. Risk Communication Series.
 See 0464
 Community Relations during  Enforcement
 Activities and Development of the Adminis-
 trative Record.
 See 0465
 Community Relations during  Enforcement
 Activities and Development of the Adminis-
 trative Record.
 See 0466
 Community Relations  in Superfund: A Hand-
 book.
 See 0467
 Community Relations: Use of Senior  Envi-
 ronmental Employees in Superfund (Super-
 fund  Management Review: Recommendation
 43.K.L).
 See 0088
  Comparative Analysis of Remedies Selected
  in the Superfund Program during FY 87, FY
  88 and FY 89.
  See 0519
  Compendium of ERT Air Sampling Proce-
  dures.
  See  0901
  Compendium of ERT Field Analytical Proce-
  dures.
  See  0902
  Compendium of ERT Groundwater Sampling
  Procedures.
  See  0903
  Compendium of ERT Soil Sampling  and Sur-
  face Geophysics Procedures.
  See  0904
  Compendium  of  ERT Surface Water and
  Sediment Sampling Procedures.
  See 0905
  Compendium of ERT Toxicity Testing Proce-
  dures.
  See 0906
  Compendium of ERT Waste Sampling Pro-
  cedures.
  See 0907
  Compendium of  NPL Listing  Policies and
   Procedures, 1982  to 1985.
   See 0338
Compendium of ROD Language for FY 1993
Focus Areas.
See 1083
Compliance with  Third Third  Requirements
Under the LDRs.  Superfund LDR Guide No.
8.
See 0418
Computer Models Used to Support Cleanup
Decision-Making at Hazardous and Radioac-
tive Waste Sites.
See 1218
Conducting Non-Time-Critical Removal  Ac-
tions under CERCLA.
See 0999
Conducting  Remedial  Investigations/Feasi-
bility Studies for  CERCLA Municipal  Landfill
Sites.
See 1084
Congressional  Limits  for FY  92 Alternative
Remedial Contracting Strategy (ARCS) Pro-
gram Management Costs.
See 0022
Consent  Orders and the  Reimbursement
 Provision Under Section 106(b) of CERCLA.
 See 0520
 Consideration of ARARs during Removal Ac-
 tions.
 See 0419
 Consideration  of RCRA Requirements  in
 Performing CERCLA Responses at Mining
 Waste Sites.
 See 0420
 Considerations in  Ground  Water  Remedi-
 ation at Superfund Sites.
 See 1436
 Consultation  on   Records  of   Decision
 (RODS) for Containment-Only Remedies.
 See 0521
 Contingency Analysis Modeling  for Super-
 fund Sites and Other Sources.
 See  1219
  Continuous Release-Emergency Response
  Notification System and Priority Assessment
  Model: Model Documentation.
  See 1143
  Continuous  Release-Emergency Response
  Notification System and Priority Assessment
  Model: User's Manual for EPA Regions.
  See 1144
  Continuous Release - Emergency Response
  Notification System.  User's Manual for In-
  dustry.
  See 1145
  Contracting and Subcontracting Guide to the
  Superfund Program.
  See 0023
  Control of Air Emissions from Materials Han-
  dling during Remediation. Engineering Bulle-
  tin.
  See 1398                       _«.,..
  Control of Air Emissions from Superfund Air
  Strippers at  Superfund  Groundwater  Sites.
  See 1399
  Control of  Air Emissions  from Superfund
  Sites.
  See 1400
  Coordination of EPA and State Actions in
  Cost Recovery.
  See 0522
  Cost of Remedial Action Model.
  See 1085
  Cost  of Remedial  Actions (CORA) Model:
  Overview and Applications.
  See 1086
  Cost  Recovery Actions/Statute  of Limita-
  tions.
   See 0523
   Cost Recovery Actions under CERCLA.
   See 0524
                 SU-26
I     	iiitl	i	Li
                                                                      ,i.:li,, IKltii, ili	'

-------
                                                      SUBJECT INDEX
                                                                                                         HAZARDOUS MATERIALS
  Cost Recovery Referrals.
  See 0525
  Counting State-Lead Enforcement NPL Sites
  Toward  the CERCLA Section 116(e) Reme-
  dial Action Start Mandate.
  See 0468
  Covenants Not to Sue under SARA.
  See 0526
  Criminal Investigations and  the  Superfund
  Program.
  See 0469
  CWM  PO*WW*ER  (Trade Name)  Evapora-
  tion-Catalytic Oxidation Technology: Applica-
  tions Analysis Report.
  See 1225
  Data Quality Objectives  Process for  Super-
  fund.
  See 0981
  Debarment and Suspension.
  See 0470
  Demonstration of a Trial Excavation  at the
  McColl Superfund Site.
  See 1226
  Demonstration of Waste Treatment Technol-
  ogies.
  See 1229
  Determination of  Imminent and Substantial
  Endangerment for Removal Actions.
  See 1000
  Determining Soil  Response  Action  Levels
  Based on Potential Contaminant Migration to
  Ground Water: A Compendium of Examples.
  See 1497
  Development  of  Emerging  Technologies
  within the SITE Program.
  See 1231
  Discussions with the Public Concerning NPL
  Listings.
  See 0339
  Distribution  of DRAFT Soil Screening Level
  Guidance.
  See 1500
  DuPpnt/Oberlin  Microfiltration Technology.
 Applications Analysis Report.
 See 1584
 ECO Update:  Ecological Assessment of Su-
 perfund  Sites. An  Overview.  Volume  1,
 Number 2, December 1991.
 See 1019
 ECO Update: The Role of BTAGs in Ecologi-
 cal  Assessment. Volume 1, Number 1  Sep-
 tember1991.
 See 1020
 ECO Update. Volume 1, Number  3. The
 Role of Natural Resource Trustees in the
 Superfund Process.
 See 1021
 ECO Update. Volume 1, Number 4. Develop-
 ing  a Work Scope for Ecological Assess-
 ments.
 See 1022
 ECO Update. Volume  1, Number 5, August
 1992. Briefing the  STAG: Initial Description
 of Setting, History, and Ecology of a Site
 See 1023
 Ecological Risk  Assessment  Methods: A
 Review  and  Evaluation of Past Practices in
 the Superfund and RCRA (Resource Conser-
 vation and Recovery Act)  Programs (Execu-
 tive Summary Included).
 See 1024
 Ecological Risk Management in the Super-
 fund and RCRA (Resource Conservation and
 Recovery Act) Programs.
 See 1025
 Ecosystem Effects of Superfund. National
 Priority List Sites in Industrial Landscapes: A
 Framework for Policy Decisions.
See 0135
  Effect  of  OSHA's Bloodborne  Pathogens
  Standard on Hazardous Waste Cleanup Ac-
  tivities.
  See 1026
  Emergency  Responders  Agreements  for
  Fund-Lead Remedial Actions.
  See 1001
  Emergency  Response  Cleanup  Services
  Contracts (ERGS).  Users Manual.
  See 0024
  Emergency Response Notification System.
  See 0927
  Endangerment Assessment Guidance.
  See 0527
  Endangerment Assessment Guidance.
  See 0528
  Endangerment Assessment Handbook.
  See 0529
  Endangerment Assessment Handbook.
  See 0530
  Enforcement Project  Management  Hand-
  book.
  See 0531
  Enforcement Project  Management  Hand-
  book.
  See 0532
  Enforcement Project  Management  Hand-
  book.
  See 0533
  Enforcement under SACM:  Interim  Guid-
  ance. Volume 1, Number 3, December 1992.
  See 0090
  Engineering Bulletin: Pyrolysis Treatment.
  See 1234
  Engineering Bulletin: Slurry Walls.
  See 1235
  Engineering  Bulletin: Technology  Preselec-
  tion Data Requirements.
  See 1405
  Enhancing  State   Superfund  Capabilities:
  Nine-State Study.
 See 0471
  Ensuring the Adequacy of Cost Share  Provi-
 sions in Superfund State Contracts.
 See 0472
 Entry and Continued Access under CERCLA.
 See 0534
 Environmental    Asbestos    Assessment
 Manual. Superfund Method for the Determi-
 nation of Asbestos  in Ambient Air. Part  1.
 Method.
 See 1027
 Environmental    Asbestos    Assessment
 Manual. Superfund Method for the Determi-
 nation of Asbestos  in Ambient Air. Part  2.
 Technical Background Document.
 See 1028
 Environmental Compliance Branch,  Standard
 Operating Procedures and Quality Assurance
 Manual, Revision 1.
 See 0535
 EPA Interim Guidance on Indemnification of
 Superfund  Response  Action  Contractors
 Under Section 119 of SARA.
 See 0536
 EPA/Navy CERCLA  Remedial Action Tech-
 nology Guide.
 See 1241
 EPA Oversight of Remedial Designs and Re-
 medial Actions Performed by PRPs.
 See 1124
 EPA/U.S. Army Corps of Engineers  Payment
 Process,   Direct  Cite/Revised  Reimburse-
 ment Methods.
 See 1125
 EPA/USACE Payment Process: Direct Cite/
 Revised Reimbursement Methods
See 1126
 Establishing  Work Zones at Uncontrolled
Hazardous Waste Sites.
See 0908
  Estimating  Potential  for  Occurrence  of
  DNAPL at Superfund Sites.
  See 1442
  Estimating VOC Emissions from  Superfund
  Sites in the Houston-Galveston Texas Area.
  (NNEMS Project No. 1302).
  See 1406
  Evaluation and Testing of a Protocol to De-
  termine the Aerobic Degradation Potential of
  Hazardous Waste Constituents in Soil.
  See 1503
  Evaluation of Cleanup Levels for Remedial
  Action at CERCLA (Comprehensive Environ-
  mental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
  ity Act) Sites  Based on a  Review  of  EPA
  (Environmental  Protection Agency) Records
  of Decision.
  See 1245
  Evaluation  of Commercially-Available Porta-
  ble Gas Chromatographs.
  See 1478
  Evaluation of Ground-Water Extraction Rem-
  edies: Phase 2. Volume 1. Summary Report.
  See 1444
  Evaluation of Ground-Water Extraction Rem-
  edies: Phase 2. Volume 2. Case Studies and
  Updates.
  See 1445
  Evaluation of Ground-Water Extraction Rem-
  edies. Volume 2. Case Studies 1-19.
  See 1446
  Evaluation of Ground-Water Extraction Rem-
  edies. Volume  3. General Site Data:  Data
  Base Reports.
  See 1447
  Evaluation  of   Soil  Venting   Application.
  Ground Water Issue.
  See 1505
  Evaluation of Terrestrial Indicators for Use in
 Ecological   Assessments   at  Hazardous
 Waste Sites.
 See 1249
 Evaluation of the Likelihood of DNAPL Pres-
 ence at NPL Sites: National Results.
 See 1448
 Evaluation   of  Unsaturated/Valdose  Zone
 Models for Superfund Sites.
 See 1449
 Exercising Flexibility through  the Superfund
 Accelerated Cleanup Model (SACM).
 See 0091
 Expanded Civil Judicial Referral Procedures.
 See 0539
 Expansion of Direct Referral of Cases to the
 Department of Justice.
 See 0540
 Expedited Response Actions.
 See 1003
 Expediting Remedial  Construction.
 See 1127
 Extending the Tracking of Analytical Serv-
 ices to  Potentially Responsible  Party-Lead
 Superfund Sites (Supplemental Guidance on
 OSWER Directive 9240.0-2A).
 See 0986
 Facilitated Transport. Series of Issue Papers
 (3rd).
 See 1451
 Feasibility Study: Detailed Analysis of Reme-
dial Action Alternatives.
See 1088
Feasibility Study: Development and  Screen-
ing  of Remedial Action Alternatives.
See 1089
Field Applications of Robotic Systems in
Hazardous Environments, p1-29  1993. See
also PB86-176344 and PB92-166743.
See 1251
                                                                                                                         SU-27

-------
HAZARDOUS MATERIALS
                                                        SUBJECT INDEX
    Field Standard Operating Procedures for Air
    Surveillance F.S.O.P. No. 8.
    Sco 0910
    FteW Standard Operating Procedures for Es-
    tablishing Work Zones (F.S.O.P. 6).
    Soo0911
    Reid  Standard  Operating Procedures for
    Preparation of a Site Safety Plan  F.S.O.P.
   'So, 9.      .......................
    See 0912
    Field Standard Operating Procedures for the
    Decontamination of  Response  Personnel
    F.S.O.P. No. 7.
    See 0913
   .Final EPA Policy on the  Inclusion of Environ-
   • "mortal Auditing Provisions in Enforcement
    Settlements.
    Se« 0541
    Final  Guidance on  Administrative  Records
    for Selecting CERCLA Response Actions.
    Se« 0473
    Final  Guidance on  Implementation of the
    'Consistency' Exemption to  the  Statutory
   ..... limits on Removal Actions.
    Sat 1004 .................
   i Final Guidance  on Preparing Waste-In Lists
    and Volumetric  Rankings for Release to Po-
    tentially Responsible Parties (PRPs) under
    CERCLA ('Waste-In' Guidance).
    Soa 0542
    Final Policy on Setting RI/FS Priorities.
    Soa 1090
    Forum Focus, August 1993.
    Soa 0136
    Forum  on   Innovative  Hazardous  Waste
    Treatment   Technologies:  Domestic  and
   Mntofnational. Held  in  Atlanta, Georgia on
   ..... Juna 19-21, 1989. Technical Papers.
    Sea 1253
    Forum  on   Innovative  Hazardous  Waste
    Treatment Technologies (3rd): Domestic and
    International. Held In Dallas, Texas on June
     11-13, 1991.  Technical  Papers.
    Sea 1254
    funding of State Enforcement Related Ac-
          '
     Sea 0474
   3 Further Direction on Implementing the Su-
   ,. perfund Accelerated Cleanup Model (SACM).
     See 0093
     Furthering the Dse of Innovative Treatment
     Technologies In OSWER Programs.
     See 1255
     Furthering the Use of Innovative Treatment
     Technologies in OSWER Programs.
     Sea 1256
     FY 1992 Themes for Regional Coordination
     to Support Continuous Improvements of Su-
     perfund's Remedial Program.
     Sea 1091
     Getting Ready: Scoping the RI/FS.
     See 1092
     Granular Activated Carbon Treatment Engi-
     neering Bulletin.
     Sea 1258
     Ground-Water issue: Characterizing Soils for
     Hazardous Waste Site Assessments.
     See 1455
     Ground Water Sampling for Metals Analyses.
     Supertund Ground Water Issue.
     See 1459
   ;  Guidance Documents  Relating to Landfills
     and Contaminants.
   '  See 1259 ..................
     Guidance for Capacity~Assurance  Planning.
   ;  Capacity Planning Pursuant to CERCLA Sec-
     36n 104(c)(9).
     See 0137
   -"Guidance for  Coordinating ATSDR  Health
     Assessment Activities with the  Superfund
     Remedial Process.
     Sea 1029
  SU-28
Guidance for Data Useability in Risk Assess-
ment.
See 1030
Guidance for Data Useability in Risk Assess-
ment.
See 1031
Guidance for Data Useability in Risk Assess-
ment. Interim Report.
See 1032
Guidance for Data Useability in Risk Assess-
ment (Part A).
See 1033
Guidance for Environmental Priorities Initia-
tive (EPI) Facilities in the Superfund Pre-Re-
medial Program.
See 0341
Guidance  for Organizing  ARCS  Contract
Files.
See 0025
Guidance for Performing Preliminary Assess-
ments under CERCLA.
See 0342
Guidance  for Performing  Site   Inspections
under CERCLA.
See  0343
Guidance of the Use  of Stipulated Penalties
in Hazardous Waste Consent Decrees.
See 0544
Guidance on Applicability  of  EPA Order
3500.1 to CERCLA Staff.
See 0545
Guidance on Applying the Data Quality Ob-
jectives Process for Ambient Air Monitoring
Around Superfund Sites (Stage 3).
See 0987
 Guidance on Applying the Data Quality Ob-
jectives Process for Ambient Air Monitoring
Around Superfund Sites (Stages 1  and 2).
 See 0988
 Guidance on CERCLA Section 106 Judicial
 Actions.
 See 0546
 Guidance on CERCLA Settlements with De
 Micromis Waste Contributors.
 See 0547
 Guidance on CERCLA 106(a) Unilateral Ad-
 ministrative  Orders  for Remedial  Designs
 and Remedial Actions.
 See 0548
 Guidance on Documenting Decisions Not to
 Take Cost Recovery Actions.
 See 0549
 Guidance on Drafting Consent Decrees  in
 Hazardous Waste Cases.
 See 0550
 Guidance on EPA Oversight of  Remedial De-
 signs and Remedial Actions Performed by
 Potentially Responsible Parties.
 See 1128
 Guidance  on  Expediting  Remedial Design
 and Remedial Action.
 See 1129
 Guidance on Federal Superfund Liens.
 See 0551
 Guidance on Implementation of the 'Contrib-
 ute to Remedial Performance' Provision.
 See 1093
 Guidance  on Implementation  of the Super-
 fund  Accelerated Cleanup  Model  (SACM)
 under CERCLA and the NCP.
 See 0094
 Guidance on Landowner Liability under Sec-
 tion 107(a)(1)  of CERCLA, De Minimis Set-
 tlements  under  Section   122(g)(1)(B)   of
 CERCLA, and Settlements with Prospective
 Purchasers of Contaminated Property.
 See 0552
 Guidance on  Oversight of Potentially Re-
 sponsible Party Remedial Investigations and
 Feasibility Studies. Volume 1.
 See 1094
Guidance on  Oversight of Potentially Re-
sponsible Party Remedial Investigations and
Feasibility Studies.  Volume 2. Appendices.
See 1095
Guidance on Premium Payments in CERCLA
Settlements.
See 0553
Guidance on  Preparing Waste-in Lists and
Volumetric Rankings for Release to Poten-
tially  Responsible  Parties  (PRPs)  under
CERCLA.
See 0554
Guidance  on  Procedures for  Submitting
CERCLA Section 106(b) Reimbursement Pe-
titions and  on EPA Review of Those Peti-
tions.
See 0555
Guidance on Program Management Activi-
ties under ARCS.
See 0026
Guidance on Remedial Actions  for Super-
fund Sites with PCB Contamination.
See  1260
Guidance on Remedial Actions  for Super-
fund Sites with PCB Contamination.
See  1261
Guidance Regarding  CERCLA Enforcement
against Bankrupt Parties.
See 0556
Guide for  Conducting Treatability  Studies
under CERCLA.
See 1154
Guide for  Conducting Treatability  Studies
under CERCLA.
See 1155
Guide for  Conducting Treatability  Studies
under  CERCLA:  Aerobic   Biodegradation
 Remedy Screening.
 See 1156
 Guide  for  Conducting Treatability  Studies
 under  CERCLA:  Aerobic   Biodegradation
 Remedy Screening. Interim Guidance.
 See 1157
 Guide  for  Conducting Treatability Studies
 under  CERCLA:  Aerobic   Biodegradation
 Remedy Screening.  Quick  Reference  Fact
 Sheet.
 See 1158
 Guide  for Conducting Treatability Studies
 under CERCLA: Biodegradation Remedy Se-
 lection. Interim Guidance. .
 See 1159
 Guide  for Conducting Treatability Studies
 under CERCLA: Biodegradation Remedy Se-
 lection. Quick Reference Fact Sheet.
 See 1160
 Guide  for  Conducting  Treatability  Studies
 under CERCLA: Chemical Dehalogenation.
 See 1161
 Guide  for  Conducting  Treatability  Studies
 under  CERCLA: Chemical  Dehalogenation.
 Final Report.
 See 1162
 Guide  for  Conducting  Treatability  Studies
 under CERCLA: Soil Vapor Extraction.  Inter-
 im Guidance.
 See 1163
 Guide  for  Conducting  Treatability  Studies
 under CERCLA: Soil Vapor Extraction. Quick
 Reference Fact Sheet.
 See 1164
 Guide  for Conducting  Treatability  Studies
 under  CERCLA  Solvent Extraction. Interim
 Guidance.
 See 1167
 Guide for Conducting Treatability Studies
 under CERCLA:  Solvent Extraction Quick
  Reference Fact Sheet.
  See 1168
       !l

-------
                                                       SUBJECT INDEX
                                                                                                         HAZARDOUS MATERIALS
   Guide for  Conducting  Treatability  Studies
   under CERCLA:  Thermal Desorption Quick
   Reference Fact Sheet.
   See 1169
   Guide: Methods  for  Evaluating the Attain-
   ment of  Cleanup Standards for Soils  and
   Solid Media.
   See 1508
   Guide on Remedial  Actions at Superfund
   Sites with PCB Contamination.
   See 1262
   Guide  to Addressing Pre-ROD and Post-
   ROD Changes.
   See 1096
   Guide  to Community Involvement  for Site
  Assessment Managers.
  See 0476
  Guide to  Delisting of RCRA Wastes for Su-
  perfund Remedial Responses.
  See 0422
  Guide to  Developing Action Memorandums.
  See 1097
  Guide to  Developing Superfund No  Action,
  Interim Action, and Contingency  Remedy
  RODs.
  See 1098
  Guide to  Developing  Superfund Proposed
  Plans.
  See 1099
  Guide  to  Discharging CERCLA Aqueous
  Wastes to Publicly Owned Treatment Works
  (POTWs).
  See 0423
  Guide to  Obtaining No Migration Variances
  for CERCLA Remedial Actions.
  See 0424
  Guide to Pump and Treat Groundwater Re-
  mediation  Technology.
  See 1462
  Guide to Removal  Enforcement.
  See 1006
  Guide to Selecting Superfund Remedial Ac-
  tions.
  See 1100
  Harmonization  of  QA Procedures for Envi-
  ronmental  Data Operations: Development of
  a National Consensus  Standard for  Quality
 Assurance for Environmental Proqrams
 See 0989
 Hazard Ranking System Guidance Manual.
 See 0346
 Hazardous Waste Operations and Emergen-
 cy   Response:  Uncontrolled  Hazardous
 Waste Sites  and RCRA Corrective Actions.
 See 0425
 Hazardous  Waste Operations and Emergen-
 cy Response: RCRA TSD  and Emergency
 Response Without Regard to Location   '
 See 0914
 Hazardous  Waste Superfund Collection: Da-
 tabase Thesaurus.
 See 0138
 Hazmat Team Planning Guidance.
 See 0915
 Headquarters Support Contract Management
 Procedures.
 See 0029
 Health and  Safety Roles and Responsibilities
 at Remedial Sites.
 See 0918
 Health Effects Assessment for Benzene
 See 1035
 Health Effects Assessment for Cadmium
 See 1036
 Health Effects Assessment for Carbon Tet-
 rachloride.
 See 1037
 Health Effects Assessment for Chlordane
See 1038
 Health Effects Assessment for Chloroben-
zene.
See 1039
   Health Effects Assessment for Chloroform.
   See 1040
   Health Effects Assessment for DDT.
   See 1041
   Health Effects Assessment for Methyl Ethyl
   Ketone.
   See 1042
   Health Effects Assessment  for Methylene
   Chloride.
   See 1043
   Health Effects Assessment for Naphthalene
   See 1044
   Health Effects Assessment for Phenol
   See 1045
   Health Effects Assessment for Styrene.
  See 1046
   Health Effects Assessment  for Tetrachlor-
  oethylene.
  See 1047
  Health Effects Assessment for Trichloroethy-
  lene.
  See 1048
  Health Effects Assessment for Xylenes.
  See 1049
  Health Effects Assessment for 2,4,5-Trichlor-
  ophenoxy Acetic Acid (2,4,5-T).
  See 1050
  Health   Effects   Assessment   Summary
  Tables.
  See 1051
  Health   Effects   Assessment   Summary
  Tables.
  See 1052
  Health   Effects   Assessment   Summary
  Tables.                               y
  See 1053
  Health Effects Assessment Summary Tables
  Fourth Quarter FY 1989.
  See 1054
  Highlights: Superfund Program Management.
  Fiscal Year 1993.
  See 0095
  Homeowners   Exempted  from  Superfund
  Cleanup Costs: National Policy Overview.
  See 0426
  Horsehead Resource Development Compa-
  ny,  Inc., Flame Reactor Technology.  Tech-
  nology Demonstration Summary.
 See 1264
 HSED SACM  Report. Volume 1, Number 1,
 January 1993.
 See 0096
 Hydrogeology  and  Results of Aquifer  Tests
 in the Vicinity of a Hazardous-Waste Dispos-
 al Site Near Byron, Illinois.
 See 1463
 Identification and Compilation of Unsaturat-
 ed/Vadose Zone Models.
 See 1464
 Identification of a Senior Superfund Official
 for  Addressing  Special NPL  Site-Related
 Issues.
 See 0348
 Immobilization  Technology Seminar: Speaker
 Slide Copies and Supporting Information.
 See 1555
 Implementation of the Alternative Remedial
 Contracting  Strategy (ARCS)  Task  Force
 Recommendations:  Transmittai of the Imple-
 mentation Plan.
 See  0030
 Implementation of  the  Decentralized  Con-
 tractor Performance Evaluation and Award
 Fee  Process for Selected Remedial Program
 Contracts.
 See 0031
 Implementation of the Superfund Alternative
 Remedial   Contracting  Strategy  (ARCS):
Report of the  Administrator's  Task Force.
Implementation Plan.
See 0032
   Implementing  the  Deputy  Administrator's
   Risk Characterization Memorandum.
   See 1056
   In situ Soil Flushing. Engineering Bulletin.
   See 1510
   In situ Soil Vapor Extraction Treatment.
   See 1511
   In-situ Stabilization/Solidification  of  PCB
   (Polychlorinated    Biphenyls)-Contaminated
   Soil.
   See 1556
   In situ Steam Extraction Treatment.
   See 1512
   In situ Treatment of Contaminated Ground
  Water: An Inventory of Research and Field
  Demonstrations and Strategies for Improving
  Ground Water Remediation Technologies.
  See 1466
  Initiation of PRP-Financed Remedial Design
  in Advance of Consent Decree Entry (Final).
  See 0557
  Initiatives  to Streamline the Alternative  Re-
  medial Contracting Strategy (ARCS)  Con-
  tracts' Award Fee Process.
  See 0033
  Innovative Methods  to Increase Public  In-
  volvement in  Superfund  Community  Rela-
  tions (Superfund Management Review Rec-
  ommendation No. 43.A).
  See 0097
  Innovative  Operational  Treatment Technol-
  ogies for Application to  Superfund Site: Nine
  Case Studies.
  See 1269
  Innovative  Technology: BEST Solvent Ex-
  traction Process.
  See 1270
  Innovative  Technology: Glycolate  Dehalo-
  genation.
  See 1513
  Innovative  Technology: In-situ Vitrification.
  See 1514
  Innovative  Technology:  Slurry-Phase Biode-
  gradation.
  See 1271
 Innovative Technology: Soil Washing.
 See 1515
 Innovative  Treatment Technologies: Over-
 view and Guide to Information Sources.
 See 1272
 Innovative  Treatment Technologies: Semi-
 Annual Status Report (Fourth Edition).
 See 1273
 Innovative  Treatment Technologies: Semi-
 Annual Status Report, January 1991. First
 Issue.
 See 1274
 Inside the  Hotline:  A Compilation of  1992
 Monthly Hotline Reports.
 See 0141
 Installation  Restoration Program.  Technical
 Support Document for Record of Decision,
 Cape Newenham, AFS.
 See 1276
 Integrated Timeline for Superfund Site Man-
 agement (SMR 5,15).
 See 0098
 Interim Cashout Settlement  Procedures.
 See 0558
 Interim CERCLA Settlement Policy.
 See 0559
 Interim Final Guidance Package on Funding
 CERCLA State Enforcement Actions at NPL
 Sites.
See 0477
 Interim Guidance for Soil  Ingestion  Rates.
See 1057
                                                                                                                         SU-29

-------
HAZARDOUS MATERIALS
                                                         SUBJECT INDEX
    Interim Guidance on  Establishing Soil Lead
    Cleanup Levels at Superfund Sites. Supple-
    mont  to  Interim Guidance  on Establishing
    Sot!  Lead  Cleanup  Levels at  Superfund
    Sites.
    S«al516
   : Interim Guidance on Notice Letters, Negotia-
    tions, and Information Exchange.
    Soe 0560
    Interim Guidance on Potentially Responsible
    Party Participation in Remedial Investigations
    and Feasibility Studies.
    See 0561
   	Interim Guidance on Settlements with De
    Mlnjmis Waste Contributors under Section
    I22(g)of SARA.
    Sea 0562
   iii interim Guidance: Streamlining the CERCLA
    Settlement Decision Process.
    SOQ0563
    Interim Guidelines for Preparing Nonbinding
    Preliminary Allocations of Responsibility.
    Sea 0564
   : Worim Modal CERCLA Section 122(g)  (4)
   1 Da  Minimis  Waste "Contributor  Consent
   ", Decree and  Administrative Order on  Con-
    sent
    Sea 0565
    interim RCRA/CERCLA Guidance on  Non-
   ;, Contiguous Sites and On-Site Management
   ! on Waste and Treatment Residue.
    Soa 0427
   : International  Conference on New Frontiers
    tor Hazardous Waste  Management (Third)
    Proceedings, Held  in Pittsburgh, Pennsylva-
    nia on September 10-13,1989.
    Sea 1278
    International  Waste  Technologies/Geo-Con
   . In  situ  Stabilization/Solidification: Applica-
    tions Analysis Report.
    Se« 1557
    Inventory of Treatability  Study Vendors.
    Votumel.
    Sea 1171
    Issuance of Administrative Orders for Imme-
    diata Removal Actions.
    Sea 0567
    Issuance of  Administrative  Orders  Under
    Section 3013 of the Resource Conservation
    and Recovery Act
    See 0568
     Issuance of  Final Revised  Guidance on the
   £  Usa  and Issuance  of Administrative Orders
   :,	Under Section 7003 of the Resource Con-
   ; Tservation and Recovery Act (RCRA).
     See 0569
   	Land Disposal Restrictions as Relevant and
     Appropriate Requirements for CERCLA Con-
   L laminated Soil and Debris.
     Sea 0428
     Liability of Corporate Shareholders and Suc-
     cessor Corporations for  Abandoned Sites
     Under  the  Comprehensive  Environmental
     Response, Compensation  and  Liability Act.
     See 0570
     Umitod-Uso  Chemical Protective Clothing for
     EPA Superfund Activities.
     Sea 1058
     Limiting Lead Transfers to  Private  Parties
     during  Discrete  Phases  of the  Remedial
   ;  process.
     Saa 0571
     Literature Survey of Innovative Technologies
   "" for   Hazardous Waste Site  Remediation,
     1987-1991.
     See 1281
     Long-Term  Contracting Strategy for Super-
     fund,
     See 0042
   , , Long-term Contracting Strategy for Super-
   1  fund - Implementation.
     See 0043


 SU-30
Making Superfund  Documents Available to
the Public throughout the Cleanup Process,
and Discussing Site Findings and Decisions
as They are Developed (Superfund Manage-
ment Review: No. 43 G, H, Q, R, T).
See 0100
Management Review of the Superfund Pro-
gram.
See 0101
Management Review of the Superfund Pro-
gram: Implementation Plan.
See 0102
Methodology for Early De Minimis Waste
Contributor Settlements under CERCLA Sec-
tion 122(g) (1) (A).
See 0573
Methodology for Evaluating  Potential Car-
cinogenicity in Support of  Reportabie Quanti-
ty Adjustments Pursuant to CERCLA Section
102.
See 1146
Methods for Evaluating  the  Attainment of
Cleanup   Standards.  Volume  2.   Ground
Water.
See 1469
Military Base Closures:  Guidance  on EPA
Concurrence in the Identification of Unconta-
minated  Parcels under  CERCLA  Section
120(h)(4).
See 0899
Minimizing Problems Caused  by Staff Turn-
over (Superfund Management Review: Rec-
ommendation No. 43, M, N, O).
See 0105
Mobile Incineration: An Analysis of the In-
dustry.
See 1480
Mobile/Transportable   Incineration   Treat-
ment.
See 1481
Model Administrative Order on Consent for
Removal Actions.
See 0574
Model Litigation Report  for  CERCLA Sec-
tions 106 and 107 and RCRA Section 7003.
See 0576
 Model Notice Letters.
 See 0577
 Model Statement of Work for a Remedial
 Investigation and Feasibility Study Conduct-
 ed by Potentially Responsible Parties.
 See 0578
 Model Unilateral Administrative Order for Re-
 moval Response Activities.
 See 0579
 Model Unilateral Order for  Remedial Design
 and Remedial Action.
 See 0580
 Multi-Media  Settlements  of  Enforcement
 Claims.
 See 0581
 Multi-Media  Settlements  of  Enforcement
 Claims.
 See 0582
 NACEPT  Committee  Recommendations to
 Administrator Browner.
 See 0142
 NACEPT Materials for Meeting Held on Sep-
 tember 20-21, 1993.
 See 0143
 National Oil and Hazardous Substances Pol-
 lution Contingency Plan  (as Published in the
 Federal Register, March  8,  1990).
 See 0145
 National Oil and Hazardous Substances Pol-
 lution Contingency Plan (The NCP).
 See 0146
 National Priorities List Book Set.
 See 0147
 National Priorities List Sites: Alabama.
 See 0148
National Priorities List Sites: Alabama.
See 0149
National Priorities List Sites: Alabama, 1992.
See 0150
National Priorities List Sites: Alaska.
See 0151
National Priorities List Sites: Alaska.
See 0152
National Priorities List Sites: Alaska, 1992.
See 0153
National   Priorities  List  Sites:  American
Samoa, Guam, and the Trust Territories.
See 0154
National   Priorities  List  Sites:  American
Samoa, Guam and Trust Territories.
See 0155
National  Priorities  List Sites:  Arizona  and
Nevada.
See 0156
National  Priorities  List Sites:  Arizona  and
Nevada.
See 0157
National  Priorities  List Sites:  Arizona  and
Nevada, 1992.
See 0158
National Priorities List Sites: Arkansas.
See 0159
National Priorities List Sites: Arkansas.
See 0160
National Priorities List Sites: Arkansas, 1992.
See 0161
National Priorities List Sites: California.
See 0162
National  Priorities  List  Sites: California and
Hawaii.
See 0163
National  Priorities  List  Sites: California and
Hawaii, 1992.
See 0164
National Priorities List Sites: Colorado.
See 0165
National Priorities List Sites: Colorado.
See 0166
National Priorities List Sites: Colorado, 1992.
See 0167
 National Priorities List Sites: Connecticut.
 See 0168
 National Priorities List Sites: Connecticut.
 See 0169
 National  Priorities  List Sites: Connecticut,
 1992.
 See 0170
 National Priorities List Sites: Delaware.
 See 0171
 National Priorities List Sites: Delaware.
 See 0172
 National Priorities List Sites: Delaware, 1992.
 See 0173
 National Priorities List Sites: Florida.
 See 0174
 National Priorities List Sites: Florida.
 See 0175
 National  Priorities List Sites:  Florida, 1992.
 See 0176
 National Priorities List Sites: Georgia.
 See 0177
 National Priorities List Sites: Georgia.
 See 0178
 National Priorities List Sites: Georgia, 1992.
 See 0179
 National Priorities List Sites: Hawaii.
 See 0180
 National Priorities List Sites: Idaho.
 See 0181
 National Priorities  List Sites: Idaho.
 See 0182
 National Priorities  List Sites: Idaho, 1992.
 See 0183
       I      '                          -,;

-------
                                                          SUBJECT  INDEX
                                                                                                                 HAZARDOUS MATERIALS
  National Priorities List Sites: Illinois.
  See 0184
  National Priorities List Sites: Illinois.
  See 0185
  National  Priorities List Sites:  Illinois, 1992
  See 0186
  National Priorities List Sites: Indiana
  See 0187
  National Priorities List Sites: Indiana.
  See 0188
  National  Priorities List Sites: Indiana, 1992.
  See 0189
  National Priorities List Sites: Iowa.
  See 0190
  National Priorities List Sites: Iowa.
  See 0191
  National Priorities List Sites: Iowa, 1992.
  See 0192
  National Priorities List Sites: Kansas
  See 0193
  National Priorities List Sites: Kansas.
  See 0194
  National Priorities List Sites: Kansas, 1992.
  See 0195
  National Priorities List Sites: Kentucky.
  See 0196
  National Priorities List Sites: Kentucky.
  See 0197
  National Priorities List Sites: Kentucky 1992
  See 0198
  National Priorities List Sites: Louisiana.
  See 0199
  National Priorities List Sites: Louisiana.
  See 0200
  National Priorities List Sites: Louisiana, 1992
  See 0201
  National Priorities List Sites: Maine.
 See 0202
  National Priorities List Sites: Maine.
 See 0203
 National Priorities List Sites: Maine,  1992.
 See 0204
 National Priorities List Sites: Maryland.
 See 0205
 National Priorities List Sites: Maryland.
 See 0206
 National Priorities List Sites: Maryland, 1992.
 See 0207
 National Priorities List Sites: Massachusetts.
 See 0208
 National Priorities List Sites: Massachusetts.
 See 0209
 National Priorities List Sites: Massachusetts
 1992.
 See 0210
 National Priorities List Sites:  Michigan.
 See 0211
 National Priorities List Sites: Michigan.
 See 0212
 National Priorities List Sites: Michigan, 1992.
 See 0213
 National Priorities List Sites: Minnesota.
 See 0214
 National Priorities List Sites: Minnesota.
 See 0215
 National  Priorities List  Sites:  Minnesota
 1992.
 See 0216
 National Priorities List Sites: Mississippi.
 See 0217
 National Priorities List Sites: Mississippi.
See 0218
 National Priorities List Sites:   Mississippi,
 1992.
See 0219
National Priorities List Sites: Missouri
See 0220
National Priorities List Sites: Missouri.
See 0221
National Priorities List Sites:  Missouri,  1992
See 0222
  National Priorities List Sites: Montana.
  See 0223
  National Priorities List Sites: Montana.
  See 0224
  National Priorities List Sites: Montana, 1992.
  See 0225
  National Priorities List Sites: Nebraska.
  See 0226
  National Priorities List Sites: Nebraska.
  See 0227
  National   Priorities   List  Sites:  Nebraska,
  1992.
  See 0228
  National  Priorities List  Sites:  New Hamp-
  shire.
  See 0229
  National  Priorities List  Sites:  New Hamp-
  shire.
  See 0230
  National  Priorities List  Sites:  New Hamp-
  shire, 1992.
  See 0231
  National Priorities List Sites: New Jersey.
  See 0232
  National Priorities List Sites: New Jersey.
  See 0233
  National Priorities  List Sites:  New Jersey,
  1992.
  See 0234
  National Priorities List Sites: New  Mexico.
  See 0235
  National Priorities List Sites: New  Mexico.
  See 0236
  National Priorities List Sites: New  Mexico,
  1992.
 See 0237
  National Priorities List Sites: New York.
 See 0238
 National Priorities List Sites: New York.
 See 0239
 National Priorities  List  Sites:  New York,
 1992.
 See 0240
 National Priorities  List  Sites:  North  and
 South Dakota.
 See 0241
 National Priorities  List  Sites:  North  and
 South Dakota, 1992.
 See 0242
 National Priorities List Sites: North Carolina.
 See 0243
 National Priorities List Sites: North Carolina.
 See 0244
 National Priorities List Sites: North Carolina,
 1992.
 See 0245
 National Priorities  List Sites: North  Dakota
 and South Dakota.
 See 0246
 National Priorities List Sites: Ohio.
 See 0247
 National Priorities List Sites: Ohio.
 See 0248
 National Priorities List Sites: Ohio, 1992.
 See 0249
 National Priorities List Sites: Oklahoma.
 See 0250
 National Priorities List Sites: Oklahoma.
 See 0251
 National  Priorities  List  Sites:  Oklahoma,
 1992.
 See 0252
 National Priorities List Sites: Oregon.
 See 0253
 National Priorities List Sites: Oregon.
See 0254
 National Priorities List Sites: Oregon, 1992.
See 0255
 National Priorities List  Sites: Pennsylvania.
See 0256
  National  Priorities List Sites:  Pennsylvania.
  See 0257
  National  Priorities List Sites:  Pennsylvania,
  1992.
  See 0258
  National Priorities List Sites: Puerto Rico.
  See 0259
  National Priorities List Sites: Puerto Rico.
  See 0260
  National Priorities List Sites: Puerto Rico and
  Virgin Islands, 1992.
  See 0261
  National Priorities List  Sites: Rhode Island.
  See 0262
  National Priorities List  Sites: Rhode Island.
  See 0263
  National Priorities List  Sites: Rhode Island,
  1992.
  See 0264
  National Priorities List Sites Set (1991).
  See 0265
  National Priorities List Sites:  South Carolina.
  See 0266
  National Priorities List Sites:  South Carolina.
  See 0267
  National Priorities List Sites:  South Carolina,
  1992.
  See 0268
  National Priorities List Sites: Tennessee.
  See 0269
  National Priorities List Sites: Tennessee.
  See 0270
  National  Priorities  List  Sites:  Tennessee,
  1992.
  See 0271
  National Priorities List Sites: Texas.
 See 0272
  National Priorities List Sites: Texas.
 See 0273
 National Priorities List  Sites: Texas, 1992.
 See 0274
 National Priorities  List Sites:  The United
 States Territories, 1992.
 See 0275
 National Priorities List Sites: Utah.
 See 0276
 National Priorities List Sites: Utah.
 See 0277
 National Priorities List Sites: Utah, 1992.
 See 0278
 National Priorities List Sites: Vermont.
 See 0279
 National Priorities List Sites: Vermont.
 See 0280
 National Priorities List Sites: Vermont, 1992.
 See 0281
 National Priorities List Sites: Virginia.
 See 0282
 National Priorities List Sites: Virginia.
 See 0283
 National Priorities List Sites:  Virginia,  1992.
 See 0284
 National Priorities List Sites: Washington.
 See 0285
 National Priorities List Sites: Washington.
 See 0286
 National Priorities List  Sites: Washington,
 1992.
 See 0287
 National Priorities List Sites:  West Virginia.
 See 0288
 National Priorities List Sites:  West Virginia.
 See 0289
 National Priorities List Sites:  West Virginia,
 1992.
See 0290
 National Priorities List Sites: Wisconsin.
See 0291
                                                                                                                                   SU-31

-------
HAZARDOUS MATERIALS
                                                        SUBJECT  INDEX
    National Priorities List Sites: Wisconsin.
    See 0292
    National  Priorities  Ust  Sites: Wisconsin,
       J0293
    National Priorities List Sites: Wyoming.
    See 0294
    National Priorities Ust Sftes: Wyoming.
    See 0295
    National Priorities Ust Sites: Wyoming, 1992.
    See 0296
    National Superfund Program Priorities, Fiscal
    Year 1994.
    See 0298
    Nature and Extent of Ecological Risks at Su-
    porfund Sites and "RCRA (Resource Conser-
    vation and Recovery Act) Facilities (Execu-
   ' tiva Summary Included).
    See 1060
    Nowf Policy on Performance of Risk Assess-
   (' merits  during Remedial Investigation  Feas-
   ibility Studies (RI/FS) Conducted by Poten-
    tially Responsible Parties (PRPs).
    See 1061
    Notification of Hazardous  Substance  Sites
    (Section 103{c)).
    Sea 1147
    Notification of Hazardous Waste Sites Re-
    quired  Under Section 103(c) of the Compre-
    hensive Environmental Response, Compen-
    sation  and Liability Act (CERCLA) of  1980:
    EPA Region  1.
    See 1174
   : Notification of Hazardous Waste Sites Re-
    quired  Under Section 103(o) of the Compre-
   ss hensfva Environmental Response, Compen-
    sation  and Uability Act (CERCLA) of  1980:
    EPA Region 2.
    See 1175
    Notification  of Hazardous Waste  Sites Re-
    quired Under Section 103(c) of the Compre-
    hensive Environmental Response, Compen-
   ;:: satfon and Uability Act (CERCLA)  of  1980:
    EPA Rogton3.
    See 1176
   :• Notification  of Hazardous  Waste  Sites Re-
    quired Under Section 103(c) of the Compre-
    hensive Environmental  Response, Compen-
    sation and Uability Act (CERCLA) of 1980:
    EPA Region 4.
    Se« 1177
    Notification  of Hazardous  Waste Sites Re-
    quired Under Section 103(c) of the Compre-
   ii, hor.stvo Environmental  Response, Compen-
    sation and  Uablty Act  (CERCLA) of 1980:
    EPA Region 5,
    Sea 1178
    Notification  of Hazardous  Waste Sites Re-
    quired Under Section 103(c) of the Compre-
    hensive Environmental Response, Compen-
    sation and  Liability  Act  (CERCLA) of 1980:
   ..... EPA Region 6.
     See 1179
   ...... Notification  of Hazardous Waste Sites Re-
     quired Under Section 103(c) of the Compre-
   ...... hensfye Environmental Response, Compen-
   "  Sattori and  Uablty  AH (CERCLA) of 1980:
     EPA Region 7.
     See 1180
   :  Notification  of Hazardous Waste Sites  Re-
     quired Under Section 103(c) of the Compre-
     hensive Environmental Response, Compen-
     sation  and  Liability  Act (CERCLA) of 1980:
     EPA Region 8.
     Sea 1181
     Notification  of Hazardous Waste Sites Re-
     quired Under SecUon 103(c) of the Compre-
     hensive Environmental Response, Compen-
     sation and  Uability Act (CERCLA) of 1980:
     EPA Region 9.
     See 1182
Notification of  Hazardous Waste Sites  Re-
quired Under Section 103(c) of the Compre-
hensive  Environmental Response, Compen-
sation and Uability Act (CERCLA) of 1980:
EPA Region 10.
See 1183
Notification Requirements  for Continuous
Releases of Hazardous Substances.
See 1148
NPL Characterization Project:  National  Re-
sults.
See 0355
NPL Characterization  Project: Region 1  Re-
sults.
See 0356
NPL Characterization  Project: Region 3 Re-
sults.
See 0357
NPL Characterization  Project: Region 4 Re-
sults.
See 0358
NPL Characterization Project: Region 5 Re-
sults.
See 0359
NPL Characterization Project: Region 6 Re-
sults.
See 0360
NPL Characterization Project: Region 7 Re-
sults.
See 0361
NPL Characterization Project: Region 8 Re-
sults.
See 0362
NPL Characterization Project:  Region 9 Re-
sults.
See 0363
NPL Characterization Project: Region 10 Re-
sults.
See 0364
NPL  Construction Completion  Definition  at
Bioremediation and  Soil  Vapor  Extraction
Sites.
See 0365
Obtaining a Soil and Debris Treatability Vari-
ance for  Removal Actions. Superfund  LDR
Guide No. 6B.
See 0430
OERR  Organizational  Conflict  of  Interest
 Review and  Approval  Program (Superfund
 Management Review: Recommendation No.
 46C).
 See 0046
 Off-Site Policy: RFA or Equivalent Investiga-
 tion Requirement at RCRA Treatment and
 Storage Facilities.
 See 0431
 Operations and Research at  the U.S. EPA
 Incineration   Research   Facility:   Annual
 Report for FY89.
 See 1482
 Operations and Research at  the U.S. EPA
 Incineration   Research   Facility:   Annual
 Report for FY90.
 See 1483
 Operations and Research at the U.S. EPA
 Incineration   Research   Facility:   Annual
 Report for FY91.
 See 1484
 Operations and Research at the U.S. EPA
 Incineration   Research   Facility:   Annual
 Report for FY92.
 See 1485
 OSWER  Integrated Health and Safety Stand-
 ard Operating Practices.
 See 0921
 OSWER  Source  Book: Training and Tech-
 nology Transfer Resources.
 See 1283
 OSWER  Source Book. Volume  1. Training
 and Technology  Transfer Resources, 1992-
 1993.
 See 1284
       I!        '                      ,:  : "
OSWER1 Source  Book. Volume 2. Training
and Technology Transfer Resources, 1992-
1993.
See 1285
Overview of ERNS: Emergency Response
Notification System (ERNS) Fact Sheet.
See 0935
Overview of Selected  EPA  (Environmental
Protection Agency) Regulations  and Guid-
ance  Affecting  POTW  (Publicly  Owned
Treatment Works) Management.
See 0432
Overview of the Off-Site Policy for OSCs and
RPMs.
See 0433
Overview  of  the Outyear  Liability  Model
(OLM).
See 0106
PA Review Checklist.
See 0366
PA-Score  (Preliminary Assessment  Score)
User's Manual and Tutorial. Version 2.1.
See 0367
PA-Score  (Preliminary Assessment Score),
Version 1.0 (for Microcomputers).
See  0368
PA-Score  (Preliminary Assessment Score),
Version 2.1, 3  1/2 inch (for Microcomput-
ers).
See  0369
PA-Score  (Preliminary Assessment Score),
Version 2.1,  5  1/4 inch (for Microcomput-
ers).
See 0370
PA-Score  Software,  Version   1.0.  Users
Manual and Tutorial.
See 0371
Performance of Risk Assessments in Reme-
dial   Investigation/Feasibility  Studies  (Rl/
FSs) Conducted by Potentially Responsible
 Parties (PRPs).
See 1102
 Performance  Tracking under  ARCS  Con-
tracts.
 See 0061
 Permits and Permit 'Equivalency' Processes
 for CERCLA On-Site Response Actions.
 See 0435
 Personal  Air Sampling and Air Monitoring
 Requirements under 29 CFR 1910.120.
 See 0922
 Physical/Chemical Treatment of Hazardous
 Waste  Sites:  Speaker  Slide  Copies and Sup-
 porting Information.
 See 1287
 Pilot-Scale Demonstration of a Slurry-Phase
 Biological Reactor for Creosote-Contaminat-
 ed Soil. Applications Analysis Report.
 See 1426
 Pilot-Scale  Incineration  of  Comtaminated
 Soils  from the Drake Chemical Superfund
 Site.
 See 1522
 Pilot-Scale Incineration of Contaminated Soil
 from the Purity Oil Sales and McColl Super-
 fund Sites.
 See 1290
 Pilot-Scale Incineration of  PCB-Contaminat-
 ed Sediments from the New Bedford Harbor
 Hot Spot Superfund Site.
 See 1292
 Policy  for  Enforcement   Actions  against
 Transporters under CERCLA.
 See 0584
 Policy for Superfund Compliance with the
 RCRA Land  Disposal  Restrictions.
 See 0436
 SU-32

-------
                                                      SUBJECT INDEX
                                                                                                         HAZARDOUS MATERIALS
 Policy on  Rpodplains and Wetland Assess-
 ments for CERCLA Actions.
 See 0437
 Policy on Management of Post-Removal Site
 Control.
 See 1008
 Policy  on  Recovering  Indirect Cost  in
 CERCLA Section 107 Cost  Recovery Ac-
 tions.
 See 0585
 Policy Towards Owners of Residential Prop-
 erty at Superfund Sites.
 See 0586
 Policy Towards Owners of Residential Prop-
 erty at Superfund Sites.
 See 0587
 Political Subdivision  Involvement in  Super-
 fund.
 See 0479
 Political Subdivision  Involvement in  Super-
 fund.
 See 0480
 Potential for Joint Research  between EPA
 and the U.S. Army.
 See 1293
 Potential Sources of Error in  Ground-Water
 Sampling at Hazardous Waste Sites. Ground
 Water Issue.
 See 1472
 Preliminary   Ranking   Evaluation   Score
 (PREscore) Version  1.1  (for  Microcomput-
 ers).                   ,
 See 0372
 Preparation of Hazardous Waste Referrals.
 See 0588
 PREscore Software. Users Manual and Tuto-
 rial. Version 1.0.
 See 0374
 PREscore Software: Users Manual and Tuto-
 rial Version 2.0.
 See 0375
 Presentations EPA-State  Soil  Standards
 Conference. Held in Crystal  City,  Virginia on
 January 29, 1991.
 See 1524
 Priority for  Health and Safety Requirements,
 Especially  Medical  Surveillance Require-
 ments,  for EPA  Employees Who Support
 OSWER Programs.
 See 0923
 Procedural  Guidance  on Treatment of Insur-
 ers under CERCLA.
 See 0589
 Procedures   for   Documenting   Costs  for
 CERCLA Section 107 Actions.
 See 0590
 Procedures for Transmittal of CERCLA and
 RCRA Civil Judicial Enforcement Case Pack-
 ages to  Headquarters.
 See 0591
 Procuring Innovative Technologies at Reme-
 dial  Sites: Q's and A's and Case Studies.
 See 1132
 Progress Toward Implementing Superfund.
 Fiscal Year 1988.
 See 0299
 Progress Toward Implementing Superfund.
 Fiscal Year 1989.
 See 0300
 Progress Toward Implementing Superfund,
 Fiscal Year 1990: A Report to the Congress.
See 0301
 Progress Toward Implementing Superfund,
 Fiscal Year 1991. Report to Congress.
See 0302
Proposed Method to Evaluate the Effective-
ness of Community Involvement  in Super-
fund (Superfund Management Review: Rec-
ommendation Number 43.A).
See 0109
 Prospects for In situ Chemical Treatment for
 Contaminated Soil.
 'See 1525
 PRP  Search  Supplemental  Guidance  for
 Sites in the Superfund Remedial Program.
 See 0592
 Public Awareness Signs at Superfund Sites.
 See 0481
 Quality and  Environmental Protection:  The
 EPA QA Program.
 See 0990
 Quality Assurance for  Superfund  Environ-
 mental Data Collection Activities.
 See 0991
 Quality Assurance/Quality Control Guidance
 for  Removal Activities:  Sampling QA/QC
 Plan and Data Validation Procedures.
 See 0993
 Quantifying Effects  in Ecological Site  As-
 sessments: Biological and Statistical Consid-
 erations.
 See 1063
 RCRA, Superfund Monthly Hot Line Reports.
 See 0303
 Real  Estate   Acquisition  Procedures  for
 USAGE Projects.
 See 1133
 Reassignment of CLP Transportation Func-
 tions.
 See 0063
 Recent Advances in Risk Reduction Engi-
 neering.
 See 1064
 Regional Guide: Issuing Site-Specific Treat-
 ability Variances for Contaminated Soils  and
 Debris from  Land   Disposal Restrictions
 (LDRs).
 See 1528
 Regional Oversight of Federal  Facility Clean-
 ups under CERCLA.
 See 0900
 Regional Pilot Projects and Initiatives.
 See 0064
 Regional  Pilots and  Applications of  Super-
 fund Accelerated Cleanup Model (SACM).
 See 0110
 Regional Quality Control Guidance for NPL
 Candidate Sites.
 See 0376
 Releasing Identities of Potentially Responsi-
 ble Parties in Response to FOIA Requests.
 See 0594
 Releasing Information to Potentially Respon-
 sible Parties at CERCLA Sites.
 See 0595
 Remedial  Action Report Documentation for
 Operable Unit Completion.
 See 1134
 Remedial Action, Treatment, and Disposal of
 Hazardous Waste.  Proceedings of   the
 Annual Hazardous Waste Research Sympo-
 sium (17th). Held in Cincinnati,  Ohio on April
 9-11,1991.
 See 1135
 Remedial Investigation: Site Characterization
 and Treatability Studies.
 See 1106
 Removal Cost Management System: Version
 3.2.
 See 1009
 Removal  Program Representative Sampling
 Guidance. Volume 1. Soil.
 See  1010
 Reporting  and Exchange of Information  on
 State Enforcement Actions  at National Prior-
 ities  List Sites.
See 0483
 Reporting Requirements for Continuous Re-
leases of  Hazardous  Substances: A  Guide
for Facilities and Vessels on Compliance.
See  1150
 Alternating  Current Electrocoagulation  for
 Superfund Site Remediation.
 See 1192
 Application  of  Tradescantia  Micronucleus
 Assay for In situ Evaluation of Potential Ge-
 netic Hazards from Exposure  to Chemicals
 at a Wood-Preserving Site.
 See 1195
 Bipdegradation of Creosote and Pentachlor-
 ophenol  in  Contaminated   Groundwater:
 Chemical and Biological Assessment.
 See 1432
 Comparison of Organic Emissions from Haz-
 ardous Waste Incinerators versus the 1990
 Toxic Release Inventory Air Releases.
 See 1397
 Comparison: Organic Emissions  from Haz-
 ardous Waste Incinerators versus the 1990
 Toxics Release Inventory Air Releases.
 See 1217
 Control  Technologies  for  Remediation  of
 Contaminated  Soil  and Waste Deposits at
 Superfund Lead  Batten/ Recycling Sites.
 See 1221
 Control  Technology: Estimating  Innovative
 Technology Costs for the SITE  Program.
 See 1222
 Control Technology: 1992  Update of U.S.
 EPA's  Superfund  Innovative  Technology
 Evaluation (SITE) Emerging Technology Pro-
 gram.
 See 1223
 Cost  Estimating  Systems  for   Remedial
 Action Projects.
 See 1123 .
 Demonstration  of  Hazardous  Waste Site
 Treatment Technologies.
 See 1227
 Demonstration Projects Under the U.S. EPA
 Superfund Innovative Technology Evaluation
 Program.
 See 1230
 Description of EPA SITE Demonstration  of
 the  HAZCON  Stabilization Process  at the
 Douglassville, Pennsylvania Superfund Site.
 See 1552
 EPA SITE Demonstration of the International
 Waste Technologies/Geo-Con In situ Stabili-
 zation/Solidification Process.
 See 1553
 Factors,Affecting the Applicability of Plasma
 Systems to the Cleanup of Superfund  Sites.
 See 1250
 Field Evaluation  of the  UV/Oxidation  Tech-
 nology to Treat Contaminated Groundwater.
 Proceedings of  the National  Conference
 (10th). Held in Washington, DC. on Novem-
 ber 27-29, 1989.
 See 1453
 Filtration  of Ground  Water Samples  for
 Metals Analysis.
 See 1454
 Long-Path FTIR  Measurements of Volatile
 Organic Compounds in an Industrial Setting
 (July 1989-April 1991).
 See 1413
 PAST: The Potential ARARs Selection Tool.
 See  0434
 Personnel Protection  through  Reconnais-
 sance  Robotics  at Superfund  Remedial
 Sites.
See  1286
 Potential  Surrogate  Metals  for Incinerator
Trial Burns.
See  1486
Quality Assurance for the SITE (Superfund
 Innovative Technology Evaluation)  Program
Demonstrations.
See 0992
                                                                                                                           SU-33

-------
HAZARDOUS MATERIALS
      SUBJECT INDEX
    Removal of Creosote from Soil by Thermal
    Desorptkxi.
    S4H1S30
    Results from the Stabilization Technologies
    Evaluated by the Site  Program. New Eng-
    land Environmental Expo 90.
    S*e 1558
    SITE Demonstration of  the CHEMFIX Solidi-
    fication/Stabilization Process at the Portable
    Equipment Salvage Company Site.
    S««1559
   'Smalt Systems  Meet Superfund  Challenge
    Wtth Point-of-Entry Treatment Units.
    Sea 1304
    SoUdificaOon/Stabifization: Is It Always Ap-
    propriate.
    Sea 1560
    Use of Electrokinetics for Hazardous Waste
    Site Remediation.
    See 1366
    Resources Conservation Company B.E.S.T.
   i (Trade  Name) Solvent  Extraction Technolo-
    gy: Application Analysis Report.
   ;jBee.1294   ........ ..................
   .Resources for Preparing Independent Gov-
    ernment Estimates for Remedial Contracting
   « Work Assignments
    Sea 0066
    Response Action Contractor Final Indemnifi-
    cation  Guidelines.  Volume Z,  Number  1,
    Ma«h 1993.
    S«e0067
    Retech, Inc.,  Plasma  Centrifugal  Furnace:
    Applications Analysis Report.
    Review and Evaluation of Area Source Dis-
    persion Algorithms for Emission Sources at
    Suportund Sites.
    See 1416
   : Revised EPA Guidance on Parallel Proceed-
    ings,
    See 0597
    Revised Hazard  Ranking System: An  Im-
   : proved Tool for Screening Superfund Sites.
    See 0377
   Jftevjaad  Hazard, Ranking  System:  Back-
    ground Information.
    See 037S
    Revised Hazard Ranking System: Evaluating
   '"Sftes After Waste "Removals.
    See 0379
   ! Revised  Hazard Ranking  System  (HRS):
    RnalRule.
    Sea 0380
    Revised Hazard  Ranking System: Qs and
    As. .......
    Soe 0381
    Revised Hazardous  Waste Bankruptcy Guid-
    ance,
    See 0598
    Revised Hazardous  Waste Bankruptcy Guid-
    ance, October 7, 1991.
    See 0599
    Revised Procedures  for  Implementing Off-
    Site Response Actions.
    Sea 0601
    Revision of Policy  Regarding  Superfund
    Project Assignment  between Alternative Re-
    medial Contracting Strategy Contractors and
    the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers.
    See 0068
   : '...Revisions to OMB  Circular A-94 on Guide-
   j ,"|nos  and Discount Rates for Benefit-Cost
   • Analysis.
    &HS1107
    Revisions to the Interim  Guidance on PRP
    Participation in Remedial Investigations and
   ;• feasibility Studies.
    Seo0603
   ;;::; RI/FS improvements Follow-Up.
    Sea 1109
RI/FS Streamlining.
See 1110
Risk Assessment  Guidance  for Superfund.
Volume 1. Human Health Evaluation Manual.
Part A, April 1990.
See 1066
Risk Assessment  Guidance  for Superfund.
Volume 1. Human  Health Evaluation Manual
(Part B).
See 1067
Risk Assessment  Guidance  for Superfund.
Volume 1. Human  Health Evaluation Manual
(Part B, Development of Risk-Based Prelimi-
nary Remediation Goals).
See 1068
Risk Assessment  Guidance  for Superfund.
Volume 1. Human  Health Evaluation Manual
(Part C).
See 1069
Risk Assessment  Guidance  for Superfund.
Volume 1. Human  Health Evaluation Manual
(Part C, Risk Evaluation of Remedial Alterna-
tives).
See 1070
Risk Assessment  Guidance  for Superfund.
Volume 1. Human  Health Evaluation Manual.
Supplemental Guidance:  'Standard Default
Exposure Factors'.
See 1071
Risk Assessment  in Superfund: A Primer.
First Edition, September 1990.
See 1073
Risk Reduction Engineering  Laboratory Site
Remediation  Technical  Support  Program:
FY92 Annual Report.
See 1296
ROD Annual Report, FY 1989.
See 1111
ROD Annual Report, FY 1990.
See 1112
ROD Annual Report, FY1991. Volume 1.
See 1113
ROD Annual Report, FY1991. Volume 2.
See 1114
ROD Annual Report, FY 1992.
See 1115
Role of Community Interviews in the Devel-
opment of a Community  Relations Program
for Remedial Response.
See 0485
Role of Expedited Response Actions under
SARA.
See 1116
Role  of the  Baseline  Risk  Assessment in
Superfund Remedy Selection Decisions.
See 1075
Roles and Responsibilities of Deputy Project
Officers and Work Assignment  Managers
under the Technical Enforcement Support
(TES) Contracts.
See 0069
Roles  and   Responsibilities  of  Regional
Project Officers, Zone Project Officers, Work
Assignment Managers  and Contracting Offi-
cers for the RCRA Enforcement,  Permitting
and Assistance Contracts (REPA).
See 0070
Roles  and   Responsibilities  of  Regional
Project  Officers   and  Headquarters  Zone
Project  Officers  for Management of TES
(TES 5) Contracts.
See 0604
Scope of the CERCLA Petroleum Exclusion
under Sections 101 (14) and 104(a)(2).
See 0605
Site Assessment:  Evaluating  Risks at Super-
fund Sites.
See 1076
Site Classification Changes from  Enforce-
ment to Fund Lead.
See 0606
SITE Emerging Technologies Project: Bab-
cock and Wilcox Cyclone Vitrification.
See 1303
Site  Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
Frequency by Party Name Report.
See 0607
Site  Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
Frequency by Party Name Report.
See 0608
Site  Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
Frequency by Party Name Report.
See 0609
Site  Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
Frequency by PRP Name Report, September
26, 1991.
See 0610
Site  Enforcement Tracking  System (SETS)
(National).
See 0611
Site  Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
National Alphabetical Report by PRP Name,
September 26,1991.
See 0612
Site  Enforcement Tracking  System (SETS)
(National) (for Microcomputers).
See 0613
Site  Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
National Frequency by PRP Name Report.
See 0614
Site  Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
National PRP Listing Alphabetically by PRP
Name.
See 0615
Site  Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
National PRP Listing Alphabetically by PRP
Name.
See 0616
Site  Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
National PRP Listing by Site.
See 0617
Site  Enforcement Tracking  System (SETS):
National PRP Listing by Site.
See 0618
Site  Enforcement Tracking  System (SETS):
National PRP Report by Site, September 26,
1991.
See  0619
Site  Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)
(National - 3  1/2  Inch Diskette, IBM PS/2
Compatible) (for Microcomputers).
See  0620
Site  Enforcement Tracking  System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Alabama.
See  0621
Site  Enforcement Tracking  System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Alabama.
See  0622
Site  Enforcement Tracking  System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Alabama.
See  0623
Site  Enforcement Tracking  System (SETS):
PRP  Listing by Site  for American Samoa.
See  0624
Site  Enforcement Tracking  System (SETS):
PRP  Listing by Site  for American Samoa.
See  0625
Site  Enforcement Tracking  System (SETS):
PRP  Listing by Site  for American Samoa.
See  0626
Site  Enforcement Tracking  System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Arizona.
See 0627
Site  Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Arizona.
See 0628
Site  Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Arizona.
See 0629
 SU-34
                                                                                                   •-I	-

-------
                                                     SUBJECT INDEX
                                                          HAZARDOUS MATERIALS
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Arkansas.
See 0630
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Arkansas.
See 0631
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Arkansas.
See 0632
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for California.
See 0633
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for California.
See 0634
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for California.
See 0635
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Colorado.
See 0636
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Colorado.
See 0637
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Colorado.
See 0638
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Connecticut.
See 0639
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Connecticut.
See 0640
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Connecticut.
See 0641
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Delaware.
See 0642
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Delaware.
See 0643
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Delaware.
See 0644
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Florida.
See 0645
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Florida.
See 0646
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Florida.
See 0647
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Georgia.
See 0648
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Georgia.
See 0649
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Georgia.
See 0650
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Idaho.
See 0651
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Idaho.
See 0652
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Idaho.
See 0653
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Illinois.
See 0654
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Illinois.
See 0655
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Illinois.
See 0656
Site  Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Indiana.
See 0657
Site  Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Indiana.
See 0658
Site  Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Indiana.
See 0659
Site  Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Iowa.
See 0660
Site  Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Iowa.
See 0661
Site  Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Iowa.
See 0662
Site  Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Kansas.
See 0663
Site  Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Kansas.
See 0664
Site  Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Kansas.
See 0665
Site  Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Kentucky.
See 0666
Site  Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Kentucky.
See 0667
Site  Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Kentucky.
See 0668
Site  Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Louisiana.
See 0669
Site  Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Louisiana.
See 0670
Site  Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Louisiana.
See 0671
Site  Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Maine.
See 0672
Site  Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Maine.
See 0673
Site  Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Maine.
See 0674
Site  Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Maryland.
See 0675
Site  Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Maryland.
See 0676
Site  Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Maryland.
See 0677
Site  Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Massachusetts.
See 0678
Site  Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Massachusetts.
See 0679
Site  Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Massachusetts.
See 0680
Site  Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Michigan.
See 0681
Site  Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Michigan.
See 0682
Site  Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Michigan.
See 0683
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Minnesota.
See 0684
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Minnesota.
See 0685
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Minnesota.
See 0686
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Mississippi.
See 0687
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Mississippi.
See 0688
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Mississippi.
See 0689
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Missouri.
See 0690
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Missouri.
See 0691
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Missouri.
See 0692
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Montana.
See 0693
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Montana.
See 0694
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Montana.
See 0695
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Nebraska.
See 0696
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Nebraska.
See 0697
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Nebraska.
See 0698
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Nevada.
See 0699
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Nevada.
See 0700
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Nevada.
See 0701
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for New Hampshire.
See 0702
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for New Hampshire.
See 0703
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for New Hampshire.
See 0704
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for New Jersey.
See 0705
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for New Jersey.
See 0706
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for New Jersey.
See 0707
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for New Mexico.
See 0708
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for New Mexico.
See 0709
                                                                                                                           SU-35

-------
HAZARDOUS MATERIALS
       SUBJECT INDEX
   "Sfte Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
    PRP listing by Site for New Mexico.
    Sea 0710
    Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
    PRP Listing by Site for New York.
    Sea 0711
    Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
    PRP Listing by Site for New York.
    Sea 0712
    Site Enforcemont tracking System (SETS):
    PRP Listing by Site for New York.
    Sea 0713
    Stte Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
    PRP Listing by Site for North Carolina.
    S<30 0714
    SKa Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
    PRP Listing by Site for North Carolina.
    Sea 0715
    Slta Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
    PRP Listing by Site for North Carolina.
    Sea 0716
   .Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
    PRP Listing by Site for North Dakota.
   ,§« 0717
   :SJta Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
    PRP Usttng by Site for North Dakota.
    Sea 0718
    Stta Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
    RRP Listing by Site for North Dakota.
    See 0719
   ;Slte Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
    PRP Listing by Site for Northern Marianas.
    Sea 0720
    Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
    PRP Listing by SJta for Northern Marianas.
    Sea 0721
    Stta Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
    PRP Listing by Site for Northern Marianas.
    Sea 0722
    Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
    PRP Listing by Site for Ohio.
    Soe 0723
    Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
    PRP Listing fay Site for Ohio.
    Sea 0724
    §lte Enforcement tracking System (SETS):
    PRP Listing by Site for Ohio.
    Sea 0725
    Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
    PRP Listing by Site for Oklahoma.
    See 0726
    Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
    PRP Usttng by Site for Oklahoma.
    Sea 0727
    Site Enforcement Jrackjng System (SETS):
   IPflP Listing by Site for Oklahoma.
    See 0728
    Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
    PRP Listing by Site for Oregon.
   ::See 07,29
    Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
    PRP Listing by Site for Oregon.
    See 0730
    Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
    PRP Listing by Site for Oregon.
    See 0731
    Sfta Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
    PRP Listing by Site for Pennsylvania.
    See 0732
    Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
    PRP Listing by Site for Pennsylvania.
    See 0733
    Stte Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
    PRP Listing by Site for Pennsylvania.
    See 0734
    Stte Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
    PRP Listing by Site for Puerto Rico.
    See 0735
    Stte Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
    PRP Listing by Site for Puerto Rico.
    Sea 0736
Site  Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Puerto Rico.
See 0737
Site  Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 1.
See 0738
Site  Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 1.
See 0739
Site  Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by  Site for Region  1, January
22, 1992.
See 0741
Site  Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 1. Volume 1.
See 0742
Site  Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 2.
See 0743
Site  Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 2.
See 0744
Site  Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by  Site for Region  2, January
22, 1992.
See 0746
Site  Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 2. Volume 2.
See 0747
Site  Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 3.
See 0748
Site  Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by  Site for Region  3, January
22,1992.
See 0750
Site  Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 3. Volume 3.
See 0751
Site  Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 4.
See 0752
Site  Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 4.
See 0753
Site  Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by  Site for Region  4, January
22, 1992.
See 0755
Site  Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 4. Volume 4.
See 0756
Site  Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 5.
See 0757
Site  Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 5.
See 0758
Site  Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by  Site for Region  5, January
22, 1992.
See 0760
Site  Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 5. Volume 5.
See 0761
Site  Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 6.
See 0762
Site  Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 6.
See 0763
Site  Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by  Site for Region  6, January
22, 1992.
See 0765
Site  Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 6. Volume 6.
See 0766
Site  Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 7.
See 0767
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 7.
See 0768
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing  by  Site for Region 7, January
22,1992.
See 0770
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 7. Volume 7.
See 0771
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 8.
See 0772
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 8.
See 0773
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing  by  Site for Region 8, January
22, 1992.
See 0775
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 8. Volume 8.
See 0776
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 9.
See 0777
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 9.
See 0778
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing  by  Site for Region 9, January
22, 1992.
See 0780
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 9. Volume 9.
See 0781
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 10.
See 0782
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 10.
See 0783
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 10, January
22, 1992.
See 0785
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 10. Volume
10.
See 0786
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Rhode Island.
See 0787
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Rhode Island.
See 0783
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Rhode Island.
See 0789
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for South Carolina.
See 0790
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for South Carolina.
See 0791
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for South Carolina.
See 0792
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for South Dakota.
See 0793
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for South Dakota.
See 0794
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for South Dakota.
See 0795
SU-36
                                                                                                 	.::::	'I:,

-------
                                                    SUBJECT INDEX
                                                          HAZARDOUS MATERIALS
Site  Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Tennessee.
See 0796
Site  Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Tennessee.
See 0797
Site  Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Tennessee.
See 0798
Site  Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Texas.
See 0799
Site  Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Texas.
See 0800
Site  Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Texas.
See 0801
Site  Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Trust Territories.
See 0802
Site  Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Trust Territories.
See 0803
Site  Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Trust Territories.
See 0804
Site  Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Utah.
See 0805
Site  Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Utah.
See 0806
Site  Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Utah.
See 0807
Site  Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Vermont.
See 0808
Site  Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Vermont.
See 0809
Site  Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Vermont.
See 0810
Site  Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Virginia.
See 0811
Site  Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Virginia.
See 0812
Site  Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Washington.
See 0813
Site  Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Washington.
See 0814
Site  Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Washington.
See 0815
Site  Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for West Virginia.
See 0816
Site  Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for West Virginia.
See 0817
Site  Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for West Virginia.
See 0818
Site  Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Wisconsin.
See 0819
Site  Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Wisconsin.
See 0820
Site  Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Wisconsin.
See 0821
Site  Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Wyoming.
See 0822
Site  Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Wyoming.
See 0823
Site  Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Wyoming.
See 0824
Site  Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP National  Frequency by  Party Name,
January 22,1992.
See 0825
Site  Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP National Listing Alphabetically by Party
Name.
See 0826
Site  Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP National Listing Alphabetically by Party
Name.
See 0827
Site  Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP National Listing Alphabetically by Party
Name.
See 0828
Site  Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP National Listing Alphabetically by Party
Name.
See 0829
Site  Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP National Listing Alphabetically by Party
Name.
See 0830
Site  Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP National Listing Alphabetically by Party
Name, January 22,1992.
See 0831
Site  Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP National Listing by Site.
See 0832
Site  Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP National Listing by Site.
See 0833
Site  Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP National Listing by Site.
See 0834
Site  Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP National Listing by Site.
See 0835
Site  Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP National Listing by Site, January 22,
1992.
See 0837
Site  Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Report by Site for Region  1, September
26,1991.
See 0838
Site  Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Report by Site for Region  2, September
26,1991.
See 0839
Site  Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Report by Site for Region  3, September
26, 1991.
See 0840
Site  Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Report by Site for Region  4, September
26,1991.
See 0841
Site  Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Report by Site for Region  5, September
26, 1991.
See 0842
Site  Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Report by Site for Region  6, September
26,1991.
See 0843
Site  Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Report by Site for Region  7, September
26, 1991.
See 0844
Site  Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Report by Site for Region  8, September
26, 1991.
See 0845
Site  Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Report by Site for Region 9, September
26, 1991.
See 0846
Site  Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Report by Site for Region 10, Septem-
ber 26, 1991.
See 0847
Site  Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Site Listing by  Site for Virginia.
See 0848
Site  Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)
(Region 1  -.3 1/2  Inch Diskette IBM PS/2
Compatible) (for Microcomputers).
See 0849
Site  Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)
(Region 1) (for Microcomputers).
See 0850
Site  Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)
(Region 2-31/2  Inch Diskette IBM PS/2
Compatible) (for Microcomputers).
See 0851
Site  Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)
(Region 2) (for Microcomputers).
See 0852
Site  Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)
(Region 3-3 1/2  Inch Diskette IBM PS/2
Compatible) (for Microcomputers).
See 0853
Site  Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)
(Region 3) (for Microcomputers).
See 0854
Site  Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)
(Region 4-31/2  Inch Diskette IBM PS/2
Compatible) (for Microcomputers).
See 0855
Site  Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)
(Region 4) (for Microcomputers).
See 0856
Site  Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)
(Region 5-31/2  Inch Diskette IBM PS/2
Compatible) (for Microcomputers).
See 0857
Site  Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)
(Region 5) (for Microcomputers).
See 0858
Site  Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)
(Region 6-31/2  Inch Diskette IBM PS/2
Compatible) (for Microcomputers).
See 0859
Site  Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)
(Region 6) (for Microcomputers).
See 0860
Site  Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)
(Region 7-31/2  Inch Diskette IBM PS/2
Compatible) (for Microcomputers).
See 0861
Site  Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)
(Region 7) (for Microcomputers).
See 0862
Site  Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)
(Region 8-31/2  Inch Diskette IBM PS/2
Compatible) (for Microcomputers).
See 0863
Site  Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)
(Region 8) (for Microcomputers).
See 0864
Site  Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)
(Region 9-31/2  Inch Diskette IBM PS/2
Compatible) (for Microcomputers).
See 0865
Site  Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)
(Region 9) (for Microcomputers).
See 0866
Site  Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)
(Region 10 - 3 1/2 Inch Diskette IBM PS/2
Compatible) (for Microcomputers).
See 0867
                                                                                                                          SU-37

-------
HAZARDOUS MATERIALS
       SUBJECT INDEX
    Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)
    (Rogten 10) ((or Microcomputers).
    Sea 0868
    Site-Specific Contracting for Removals.
    S091011
    Slurry Btodegradatlon.
    S<301428
    Small Cost Recovery Referrals.
    See 0869 	
    Smart Moves In Superfund - Regional Initia-
    tives, Volume  1, Number 1, February 1992.
    Soo0305
    Smart Moves in Superfund - Regional Pilots
   * and Initiatives. Volume 1, Number 2, Sep-
    tember 1992.
    See 0306
    Smart Moves  hi Superfund - Revitalization
    One Year Later. Volume 1, Number 3, Janu-
    ary 1993.
    See 0307
   ; SoWiflcatlon/Stabpizatipn of Organics and
    Inorganics.
    Seo 1561
   ''Solvent Extraction Treatment
    Seo 1306
   ', Some Major Factors Important in Establish-
    ing Land lisa  Policy for Remediated Super-
    fund Sites.
    See 0308
   'Standard Document for Remedial Site As-
    sessment Decisions.
    Seo 0392
    Standard Operating  Safety Guides.
    See 0924
    Standard Operating  Safety Guides.
    Seo 0925
    Status of Regional Superfund Pilots: End-of-
    Year Report.
    S4W0309
    StremmBnod Approach  for Settlements with
    Da  Mirimis  Waste  Contributors  under
    CERCLA Section 122(g)(1)(A).
    Seo 0870
    Streamlining the RI/FS for CERCLA Munici-
    pal Landfill Sites.
    See 1118
    Structure and  Components of Five-Year Re-
    views.
    Sea 1120
    Structure and  Components of Five-Year Re-
    views.
    Soo1121
    Submittal of Ten-Point Settlement Analyses
    for CERCLA Consent Decrees.
    Soe0871
    Subsurface Contamination Reference Guide.
    See 1474
    Suggested  ROD   Language  for  Various
    Ground Water Remediation Options.
    See 1475
    Summary of Ecological Risks, Assessment
   : Methods, and Risk Management Decisions
    hi  Superfund and RCRA (Resource Conser-
    vation and Recovery Act).
    See 1077
    Summary of 'Guidance of Landowner Liabil-
    ity under Section 107(a)1 of CERCLA, De
    Mlnimte    Settlements    under   Section
    122(gX1)(b) of CERCLA,  and  Settlements
   • with Prospective Purchasers of  Contaminat-
    ed Property'.
    Sea 0672
    Summary of 'Guidance on CERCLA Section
    106
-------
                                                     SUBJECT INDEX
                                                                                                       HAZARDOUS MATERIALS
 Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Glean-
 up Efforts Nationwide, Summer 1993 (Fike/
 Artel Chemical Site Profile, Nitro, West Vir-
 ginia).
 See 0967
 Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Clean-
 up Efforts  Nationwide, Summer 1993 (North-
 side Landfill Site Profile, Spokane, Washing-
 ton).
 See 0968
 Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Clean-
 up Efforts Nationwide, Summer 1993  (Tri-
 State  Plating Site Profile,  Columbus,  Indi-
 ana).
 See 0970
 Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Clean-
 up Efforts Nationwide (White Chemical).
 See 0971
 Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Clean-
 up Efforts Nationwide, Winter 1993. (Wells G
 and H Site, Woburn, Massachusetts).
 See 0972
 Superfund  at Work: Hazardous Waste Clean-
 up Efforts  Nationwide, Winter 1994 (Bailey
 Waste Disposal Site Profile, Texas).
 See 0973
 Superfund  at Work: Hazardous Waste Clean-
 up Efforts Nationwide, Winter 1994 (New
 Brighton Site  Profile, Minneapolis/St.  Paul,
 Minnesota).
 See 0974
 Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Clean-
 up Efforts Nationwide, Winter 1994 (Sey-
 mour Recycling Site  Profile,  Seymour,  Indi-
 ana).
 See 0975
 Superfund Contracts Management Issues.
 See 0072
 Superfund Cost Recovery Strategy.
 See 0882
 Superfund  Desk Reference  for  Municipali-
 ties.
 See 0486
 Superfund  Docket Operations  Manual  for
 Rulemaking Activities.
 See 0081
 Superfund  Emergency Response Actions: A
 Summary  of  Federally-Funded  Removals.
 Fifth Annual Report - Fiscal Year 1990.
 See 0313
 Superfund Emergency Response Actions: A
 Summary of  Federally  Funded  Removals.
 Fourth Annual Report -  Fiscal Year 1989
 See 0314
 Superfund Emergency Response Actions: A
 Summary of  Federally-Funded  Removals.
 Sixth Annual Report, Fiscal Year 1991.
 See 0315
 Superfund Emergency Response  Actions: A
 Summary of  Federally-Funded  Removals.
 Volume 1.
 See 0316
 Superfund Emergency Response  Actions: A
 Summary of  Federally-Funded  Removals.
 Volume 2.
 See 0317
 Superfund Emergency Response  Actions: A
 Summary of  Federally  Funded  Removals.
 Volume 3.
 See 0318
 Superfund Enforcement Strategy and Imple-
 mentation Plan.
 See 0883
 Superfund Engineering Issue: Issues Affect-
ing the Applicability and Success of Remedi-
al/Removal Incineration Projects.
See 1308
Superfund Engineering Issue: Treatment of
Lead-Contaminated Soils.
See 1535
 Superfund: EPA/ICMA Superfund Revitaliza-
 tion Conference. Held in Chicago, Illinois on
 November 12-13, 1992.
 See 0319
 Superfund: EPA/ICMA Superfund Revitaliza-
 tion  Conference.  Held  in  San  Francisco,
 California on February 1-2, 1993.
 See 0320
 Superfund Fact Sheet: An Overview.
 See 0487
 Superfund Fact Sheet: Benzene.
 See 0489
 Superfund Fact Sheet: Community  Inter-
 views.
 See 0490
 Superfund Fact Sheet:  Exposure Pathways.
 See 0393
 Superfund Fact Sheet: Identifying Sites.
 See 0491
 Superfund Fact Sheet: PCBs.
 See 0492
 Superfund Fact  Sheet Public  Involvement.
 See 0493
 Superfund Fact  Sheet: The  Remedial  Pro-
 gram.
 See 0494
 Superfund Fact  Sheet: The Removal  Pro-
 gram.
 See 0495
 Superfund Fact Sheet: Trichloroethylene.
 See 0496
 SUPERFUND:  Focusing on  the  Nation at
 Large. A Decade  of Progress at National
 Priorities List Sites.
 See 0321
 Superfund: Focusing on the Nation at Large.
 A Decade of Progress at National Priorities
 List Sites.
 See 0322
 Superfund: Focusing on the Nation at Large.
 1991  Update.
 See 0323
 Superfund Ground Water Issue. Contaminant
 Transport in Fractured Media: Models for
 Decision Makers.
 See 1477
 Superfund Guide: Clean Air Act Hazardous
 Air Pollutants Added to  the List of CERCLA
 Hazardous Substances.
 See 1151
 Superfund  Guide: Reportable  Quantity  Ad-
 justment for Methyl  Isocyanate (MIC).
 See 1152
 Superfund Guide to RCRA Management Re-
 quirements for Mineral  Processing Wastes.
 See 0439
 Superfund Information Repositories and Ad-
 ministrative Records: Introduction for Librar-
 ians.
 See 0497
 Superfund Information Repositories and Ad-
 ministrative Records.
 See 0884
 Superfund Innovative Technology Evaluation
 Program:  Progress  and Accomplishments,
 Fiscal Year  1989. A Third  Report to Con-
 gress.
 See 1311
 Superfund Innovative Technology Evaluation
 Program:  Progress  and Accomplishments,
 Fiscal Year 1990. A Fourth Report to Con-
 gress.
 See 1312
 Superfund Innovative Technology Evaluation
 Program:  Progress  and Accomplishments
 Fiscal Year 1991. A 5th Report to Congress.
See 1313
Superfund Innovative Technology Evaluation
 Program: Spring Update to  the  Technology
Profiles. Fourth  Edition.
See 1314
 Superfund Innovative Technology Evaluation
 Program: Technology Profiles, Fifth Edition.
 See 1315
 Superfund Innovative Technology Evaluation
 Program:  Technology  Profiles,   November
 1989.
 See 1317
 Superfund Innovative Technology Evaluation
 Program: Technology Profiles, Sixth Edition.
 See 1318
 Superfund Innovative Technology Evaluation
 Technology Demonstration Summary: Chem-
 fix Solidification/Stabilization Process, Clack-
 amas, Oregon.
 See 1564
 Superfund LDR  Guide No. 1: Overview of
 RCRA Land Disposal Restrictions (LDRs).
 See 0440
 Superfund LDR Guide No. 2: Complying with
 the  California List Restrictions under Land
 Disposal Restrictions (LDRs).
 See 0441
 Superfund LDR  Guide  No.  3:  Treatment
 Standards and  Minimum  Technology  Re-
 quirements under Land Disposal Restrictions
 (LDRS).
 See 0442
 Superfund LDR Guide No. 4: Complying with
 the  Hammer  Restrictions under Land  Dis-
 posal Restrictions (LDRs).
 See 0443
 Superfund  LDR  Guide  No. 5: Determining
 When Land Disposal Restrictions  (LDRs) Are
 'Applicable' to CERCLA  Response Actions.
 See 0444
 Superfund  LDR Guide No. 6A (2nd  Edition)
 Obtaining a Soil and Debris Treatabilrty Vari-
 ance for Remedial Actions.
 See 0445
 Superfund  LDR  Guide  No. 7. Determining
 When Land Disposal Restrictions  (LDRs) Are
 Relevant and Appropriate to CERCLA  Re-
 sponse Actions.
 See 0446
 Superfund Policy Forum Update,  Volume 1,
 Number 1, February 1992.
 See 0324
 Superfund Program Implementation Manual,
 Fiscal Year 1994. Volume 1. Program Goals
 and Planning  Requirements. Volume 2. Pro-
 gram Implementation Procedures.
 See 0124
 Superfund  Program   Management  Manual,
 Fiscal Year 1994.
 See 0073
 Superfund Program: Ten Years of Progress.
 See 0977
 Superfund Progress  - Aficionado's Version:
 Progress  as of June 30,1992.
 See 0325
 Superfund Progress  - Aficionado's Version
 (Progress as of March 31, 1992).
 See 0326
 Superfund  Progress.  Aficionado's Version.
 Progress as of September 30, 1992.
 See 0327
 Superfund Progress: Fall/Winter 1992.
 See 0328
 Superfund Progress, Spring 1992.
See 0329
Superfund Progress, Summer 1992.
See 0330
Superfund:  Qualified  Disadvantaged Busi-
 ness Utilization in State Response.
See 0498
Superfund Remedial Program Financial Man-
agement Authority, Responsibilities and Pro-
cedures.
See 1137
                                                                                                                         SU-39

-------
HAZARDOUS MATERIALS
   !i',;:, :  i       "'    '"im:	if
      SUBJECT INDEX
    Suporfund  Removal   Procedures:  Action
    Momorandum Guidance.
    Sea 1012
    Suporfund Removal Procedures:  Guidance
   i;pn the Consideration of ARABS during Re-
    moval Actions.
    See 1013
    Suporfund Removal Procedures: Public Par-
   : Scipatton Guidance for On-Scene  Coordina-
    tors: Community Relations and the Adminis-
    trative Record.
    See 1014
    Suporfund Removal Procedures:  Removal
    Enforcement Guidance for On-Scene Coordi-
    nators.
    See 1015
    Suporfund Responsiveness Summaries (Su-
    porfund Management  Review: Recommen-
    dation Number 43E),
    See 0125
    Suporfund Revltafeation: Measures of Suc-
   • pass.           .....
    Soo 0334
    Suporfund Strategic Plan and Implementa-
    tion Strategy Fiscal Year 1 994.
   ..... See 0126 .............................
    Suportund Strategic Plan and Implementa-
    tion Strategy Fiscal Year 1994: Office and
    Division Plans.
    Sao 0127
    Suporfund   Technical   Assistance   Grant
    (TAG) Handbook.
    Soe 0499
    Superfund Technical Assistance Grants.
   i'&M 0502 .   .  . ...... ........ ..........
   « SoperiurkJ Technical Assistance Grants Pro-
    gram: Regional Guidance Manual.
    Seo0504
        lemental Guidance on Federal Super-
              ...............
    Supplemental Guidance on Performing  Risk
    Assessments in Remedial Investlgatlon/Fea-
    sibifity Studies (Rl/FSs). Conducted by Po-
    tentially Responsible Parties (PRPs).
    See 1078
    Supplemental Guidance to RAGS: Calculat-
    ing  th» Concentration  Term.  Volume  1,
    Number 1, May 1992.
   -gee, 1079, .................
    Supporting    State   Attorneys   General
   '""CERCLA pemegla! and Enforcement Activi-
   ties at NPL Sites'. ..................
    Soo 0506
    Survey of  Materials-Handling Technologies
    Used at Hazardous Waste Sites.
   ........ See 1323
    Synopses of Federal Demonstrations of In-
    novative Site Remediation Technologies.
    See 1324
    Technical Background  Document for Draft
    SQ^ Screening Level Guidance.
    See 1537
    Technical Guidance Document: Construction
   ''Qualify Management  for  Remedial  Action
   " ami Remedial  Design  Waste Containment
    Systems.
    Soo 1334
   l/Tacftnteal  Resource Document: Solldifica-
   jj* tton/Stabilizatlori  and  Its   Application  to
   .Waste Materials.
    See 1565
    Technical  Support  Services  for Superfund
    Site Remediation. Second Edition.
    See 1335
    Technology  Demonstration  Summary:  Bio
    Trol Soil Washing System for Treatment of a
    Wood Preserving Site.
     Sea 1633
Technology    Demonstration    Summary,
DuPont/Oberlin  Microfiltration System, Pal-
merton, Pennsylvania. April-May 1992.
See 1336
Technology Evaluation Report: Babcock and
Wilcox Cyclone Furnace Vitrification Tech-
nology. Volume 1.
See 1337
Technology Evaluation Report: Babcock and
Wilcox Cyclone Furnace Vitrification Tech-
nology. Volume 2.
See 1338
Technology Evaluation Report: International
Waste Technologies/Geo-Con In situ Stabili-
zation/Solidification.   Volume  3.   Update
Report.
See 1567
Technology Evaluation Report: International
Waste Technologies/Geo-Con In situ Stabili-
zation/Solidification.   Volume  4.   Update
Report.
See 1568
Technology  Evaluation  Report of  Retech,
Inc., Plasma Centrifugal Furnace. Volume 1.
See 1340
Technology  Evaluation  Report of  Retech,
Inc., Plasma Centrifugal Furnace. Volume 2.
See 1341
Technology Evaluation Report: Ogden Circu-
lating Bed Combustor at the McColl Super-
fund Site.
See 1344
Technology  Evaluation  Report:  SITE Pro-
gram.  CF  Systems  Organics   Extraction
System,   New  Bedford,   Massachusetts.
Volume 1.
See 1346
Technology  Evaluation  Report:  SITE Pro-
gram.  CF  Systems  Organics   Extraction
System,   New  Bedford,   Massachusetts.
Volume 2.
See 1347
Technology  Evaluation  Report:  SITE Pro-
gram Demonstration. EPA  RREL's Mobile
Volume Reduction Unit.
See 1348
Technology Evaluation Report: Site  Program
Demonstration of a Trial  Excavation at  the
McColl Superfund Site.
See 1349
Technology  Evaluation Report:  SITE  Pro-
gram Demonstration of the DuPont/Oberlin
Microfiltration Technology.
See 1350
Technology  Evaluation Report:  SITE  Pro-
gram Demonstration of the Ultrox Interna-
tional  Ultraviolet Radiation/Oxidation Tech-
nology.
See 1351
Technology Evaluation Report SITE Program
 Demonstration Test, HAZCON Solidification,
 Douglassville, Pennsylvania. Volume 1.
See 1569
Technology Evaluation Report:  SITE  Pro-
 gram  Demonstration Test,  Soliditech,  Inc.,
 Solidification/Stabilization  Process. Volume
 1.
 See 1570
 Technology Evaluation Report: SITE  Pro-
 gram  Demonstration Test, Soliditech,  Inc.
 Solidification/Stabilization Process. Volume
 2.
 See 1571
 Technology  Transfer  Needs Assessment,
 1990.
 See 1354
 Terra Vac In situ Vacuum Extraction System:
 Applications Analysis Report.
 See 1355
 Terra Vac In situ Vacuum Extraction System:
 Applications Analysis Report.
 See 1356
Thermal Desorption Treatment.
See 1357
Timely  Initiation   of   Responsible  Party
Searches,  Issuance of  Notice Letters, and
Release of Information (Attachment XXII).
See 0886
Toronto Harbour Commissioners (THC) Soil
Recycle Treatment Train. Applications Analy-
sis Report.
See 1544
Total Quality Management (TQM) and Qual-
ity Assurance (QA) in Superfund.
See 0996
Toxicological Implementations of Remediat-
ing Hazardous Wastes.
See 1359
Toxicological           Profile          for
Benzo(b)Fluoranthene.
See 1360
Transmittal of  Guidance on Use and  En-
forcement of CERCLA Information Requests
and Administrative Subpoenas.
See 0887
Transmittal of  Model Consent Decree  for
CERCLA  Section  104(e)  Information  Re-
quest Enforcement Actions.
See 0888
Transmittal of  the Final Waste Oil Interim
Enforcement Guidance Document.
See 0889
Treatability Studies Contractor Work Assign-
ments.
See 0076
Treatability  Studies  Under  CERCLA:   An
Overview.
See 1172
U.S. Bureau of  Reclamation Assistance to
the Superfund Program.
See 1138
Understanding Bioremediation: A Guidebook
for Citizens.
See 0507
Understanding Superfund Risk  Assessment.
See 0508
United  States  Environmental  Protection
Agency Model  CERCLA  RD/RA Consent
Decree.
See 0890
Update No. 2 to 'Procedures for Completion
and Deletion of NPL Sites'.
See 0395
 Updated Health Effects  Assessment for Ace-
tone.
See 1080
 USAGE  Preplaced and   Rapid  Response
Contracts.
 See 1139
 Use of CERCLA Section  106 Unilateral  En-
 forcement for Remedial Design and  Remedi-
 al Action:  Strategy for Fiscal Year 1990.
 See 0891
 Use  of Office of Research and Develop-
 ment's Bioremediation  Expertise in Super-
 fund Removal  Program.
 See 1016
 Use of Removal Approaches to Speed  Up
 Remedial Action Projects.
 See 1140
 Use of Time and  Materials and Cost Reim-
 bursement Subcontracts for Remedial  Ac-
 tions  under the Alternative  Remedial Con-
 tracting Strategy Contracts.
 See 1141
 USEPA Contract Laboratory Program Nation-
 al  Functional  Guidelines  for Organic  Data
 Review.
 See 0077
 SU-40

-------
                                                       SUBJECT INDEX
                                                                                                                          ILLINOIS
     User's Guide to the Contract Laboratory Pro-
     gram.
     See 0079
     User's Guide to the Contract Laboratory Pro-
     gram.
     See 0080
     Using State and Local Officials to Assist in
     Community Relations (Superfund  Manage-
     ment  Review: Recommendation No. 43.K.L).
     See 0128
     Vendor Information Form to  be Completed
     for Participation in the:  Vendor Information
     System for Innovative Treatment  Technol-
     ogies  (VISITT).
     See 1369
     Written Demand for  CERCLA Cost Recov-
     ery.
     See 0894
     Written Demand for  Recovery of Costs In-
     curred Under the  Comprehensive Environ-
     mental Response, Compensation, and Liabil-
     ity Act (CERCLA).
     See 0895
HAZARDOUS MATERIALS SPILLS
     Handbook:  Responding to Discharges of
     Sinking Hazardous Substances.
     See 1589
HAZARDOUS MATERIALS TRANSPORTATION
     Notification of Out-of-State Shipments of Su-
     perfund Site Wastes.
     See 0429
     Report to Congress: Settlements with Munic-
   'ipal Waste Generators and  Transporters
    Since  1991  under the Comprehensive Envi-
     ronmental Response, Compensation, and Li-
    ability  Act of 1980.
    See 0596
HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES
     Identification  of  SARA (Superfund Amend-
     ments and Reauthorization Act)  Compounds
    in Adipose Tissue.
    See 1055
HAZARDOUS WASTES
    First 125 De Minimis Settlements: Statistics
    from EPA's De Minimis Database.
    See 0543
    Forum  on  Innovative  Hazardous  Waste
    Treatment   Technologies:  Domestic   and
    International.  Held  in Atlanta,  Georgia  on
    June 19-21, 1989. Abstract Proceedings.
    See 1252
    International Symposium on Field Screening
    Methods for  Hazardous  Wastes and Toxic
    Chemicals  (2nd), Proceedings. Held in Las
    Vegas, Nevada on February 12-14,1991.
    See 1279
    Methodologies   for   Implementation   of
    CERCLA Section 122(g)  (1) (A) De Minimis
    Waste  Contributor Settlements Proposals
    and Agreements.
    See 0572
    Superfund at Work:  Hazardous Waste Clean-
    up Efforts Nationwide, Summer 1993 (Rogue
    Valley/Ditch  Creek  Ranch  Site   Profile,
    Wimer, Oregon).
    See 0969
    Waiver of Headquarters  Approval for  Issu-
    ance of RD/RA Special Notice Letters at the
    Time of ROD Signature from  OERR and
    OWPE.
    See 0893
HAZCON SOLIDIFICATION PROCESS
    Technology Evaluation Report SITE Program
    Demonstration Test, HAZCON Solidification,
    Douglassville, Pennsylvania. Volume 1.
    See 1569
HEALTH HAZARDS
    Health   Effects  Assessment   Summary
   Tables.
   See 1051
    Health   Effects   Assessment   Summary
    Tables.
    See 1052
    Health   Effects   Assessment   Summary
    Tables.
    See 1053
    Health Effects Assessment Summary Tables
    Fourth Quarter FY 1989.
    See 1054
    Methodology for  Evaluating  Potential Car-
    cinogenicity in Support of Reportable Quanti-
    ty Adjustments Pursuant to CERCLA Section
    102.
    See 1146
 HEALTH RISK
    Role  of  Health  Research in Support  of
    EPA's Regulatory  Programs.
    See 1074
 HEAT TREATMENT
    Guide for Conducting  Treatability  Studies
    under   CERCLA:   Thermal    Desorption
    Remedy Selection. Interim Guidance.
    See 1170
    SITE Emerging Technologies  Project:  Bab-
    cock and  Wilcox Cyclone Vitrification.
    See 1303
    Technology Evaluation  Report of Retech's
    Plasma Centrifugal Furnace. Volume 1.
    See 1342
    Technology Evaluation  Report of Retech's
    Plasma Centrifugal Furnace. Volume 2.
    See 1343
 HEAVY  METALS
    Development of  Electro-Acoustic Soil De-
  •  contamination (ESD) Process for In situ Ap-
    plications.
    See 1498
    Framework for Real-Time  Decision-Making:
    New Bedford Harbor Pilot Dredging Study.
    See 1587
    Superfund at Work: Hazardous  Waste Clean-
    up  Efforts Nationwide, Fall  1993  (Johns-
    Manville Site Profile, Illinois).
    See 0952
 HIGH-LEVEL RADIOACTIVE WASTES
    Implementation Plan for the Record of Deci-
    sion for Disposal  of Hanford Defense High-
    Level, Transuranic, and Tank Wastes.
    See 1266
HIGH  TEMPERATURE TESTS
    Superfund Innovative Technology Evaluation
    (SITE): Demonstration Bulletin.  Flame Reac-
    tor,   Horsehead  Resource   Development
    Company, Inc.
    See 1319
HIGHT TEMPERATURE TESTS
    Technology  Evaluation  Report: SITE  Pro-
    gram Demonstration  Test  Horsehead Re-
    source Development Company, Inc., Flame
    Reactor Technology, Monaoa, Pennsylvania.
    See 1353
HILLSBOROUGH TOWNSHIP (NEW JERSEY)
    Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Clean-
    up Efforts Nationwide, Fall 1992. (Krysowaty
    Farm, Hillsborough, New Jersey).
    See 0945
HISTORY
    Superfund Emergency Response Actions: A
    Summary  of Federally-Funded Removals.
    Volume 1.
    See 0316
    Superfund Emergency Response Actions: A
    Summary  of Federally-Funded Removals.
    Volume 2.
    See 0317
 HORSEHEAD RESOURCE DEVELOPMENT
 COMPANY
    Horsehead Resource Development Compa-
    ny, Inc. Flame Reactor Technology: Applica-
    tions Analysis Report.
    See 1263
 HOTLINE REPORTS
    Index to the Monthly Hotline Report Ques-
    tions (June 1982 to December 1991).
    See 0139
 HRD FLAME REACTOR
    Horsehead Resource Development Compa-
    ny, Inc., Flame Reactor Technology. Tech-
    nology Demonstration Summary.
    See 1264
 HRS (HAZARD RANKING SYSTEM)
    PREscore Software. Users Manual and Tuto-
    rial. Version 1.0.
    See 0374
 HUMANS
    Risk  Assessment Guidance for  Superfund.
    Volume 1. Human Health Evaluation Manual.
    Supplemental Guidance: 'Standard  Default
    Exposure Factors'.
    See 1071
 HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY
    Measurement of Hydraulic Conductivity Dis-
    tributions: A Manual of Practice.
    See 1467
 HYDRAULIC FRACTURING
    Hydraulic Fracturing Technology: Technolo-
    gy Evaluation Report and Application  Analy-
    sis Report.
    See 1265
 HYDROGEOLOGY
    Hydrogeology and Results of Aquifer Tests
    in the Vicinity of a Hazardous-Waste Dispos-
    al Site Near Byron, Illinois.
    See 1463
    New Approach and Methodologies for Char-
    acterizing  the Hydrogeologic Properties  of
    Aquifers.
    See 1470
HYDROLOGY
    Application of a  Water  Quality Assessment
    Modeling System at a Superfund Site.
    See 1573
IDAHO
    National Priorities List Sites: Idaho.
    See 0181
    National Priorities List Sites: Idaho.
    See 0182
    National Priorities List Sites: Idaho, 1992.
    See 0183
    Site Enforcement Tracking  System (SETS):
    PRP Listing by Site for Idaho.
    See 0651
    Site Enforcement Tracking  System (SETS):
    PRP Listing by Site for Idaho.
    See 0652
    Site Enforcement Tracking  System (SETS):
    PRP Listing by Site for Idaho.
    See 0653
IDENTIFYING
    Superfund Guide: Clean Air  Act  Hazardous
    Air Pollutants  Added to the List of CERCLA
    Hazardous Substances.
    See 1151
ILLINOIS
    National Priorities List Sites: Illinois.
    See 0184
    National Priorities List Sites: Illinois.
    See 0185
    National Priorities List Sites: Illinois,  1992.
    See 0186
                                                                                                                          SU-41

-------
                                                                                                                                  ll!!','Si illiiliilllllll'illill'i ''SB': fll!1
IMMUNOASSAY
                                                        SUBJECT INDEX
    Site Enforcement Tracking  System (SETS):
    PRP Listing by Site for Illinois.
    Sea 0654
    Stte Enforcement Tracking  System (SETS):
    PRP Listing by Site for Illinois.
    Sea 0855
    Site Enforcement Tracking  System (SETS):
    PRP Listing by Site for Illinois.
    S0656
IMMUNOASSAY ............................
    Suporfund Innovative Technology Evaluation
    Program  Demonstration  Plan  for Westing-
    house  Bio-Analytic  Systems  Pentachloro-
    phonol Immunoassays.
    Sea 1310
    Suporfund Innovative Technology Evaluation
    (SITE) Program Evaluation Report for Antox
    BTX Water Screen (BTX Immunoassay).
    S««1320  ..............
IMPROVEMENT
    Compendium of Good Ideas: Models of Suc-
    cess and Lessons Learned. Volume 1. High-
    tights,
    S*»0133
    Compendium of Good Ideas: Models of Suc-
    cess  and  Lessons  Learned. Volume 2.
   •-Source Book.
    508 °134
IN-SITU PROCESSING
    In situ Soil Flushing. Engineering Bulletin.
    Soe 1510
    In situ Soil Vapor Extraction Treatment
    S«« 1511
    in sttu Stoam Extraction Treatment
    SoeiSii ...................
    In «itu Treatment of Contaminated Ground
    Water; An Invfnjory of Research and Field
    Demonstrations arid Strategies for Improving
    Ground Water Remediation Technologies.
   . ..... See 1466
    Innovative Technology: In-situ Vitrification.
    Se«1514
IN smj TREATMENT
    Prospocis for in situ Chemical Treatment for
    Contaminated Soil,
   ..... Sea 1525
INCINERATION
   I Incineration Data on Arsenic and Lead Emis-
    ,,               ..........
    Se« 1267
    Mobile/Transportable   Incineration  Treat-
   "•jnerit
    See 1481
    Operations and Research at the U.S.  EPA
    Incineration  Research   Facility:   Annual
    Report for FY89.
    Sea 1482
    Operations and Research at the U.S.  EPA
    Incineration  Research   Facility:   Annual
    Report for FY90.
    S«*1483
    Operations and Research at the U.S.  EPA
   : Incineration  Research   Facility:   Annual
    Report for FY92.
    Sea 1485
    Pilot-Scale Incineration of Contaminated Soil
    from the Chemical Insecticide  Corporation
    Superfund Site.
    Sea 1523
   '.: Ptot-Scaie Incineration of PCB-Contaminat-
    «d Sedimenls from the New Bedford Harbor
    Hot Spot Superfund Site.
     Sea 1292
     Comparison: Organic Emissions from  Haz-
     ardous Waste Incinerators versus the  1990
     Toxics Release Inventory Air Releases.
     Se« 1217
     Control  of Transient Incinerator Emissions
     with an  Oxygen Based Combustion System.
     See 1401


 SU-42
    Incineration  Treatment  of Arsenic-Contami-
    nated Soil.
    See 1268
    Pilot-Scale Incinerability Evaluation  of  Ar-
    senic-and  Lead-Contaminated  Soils from
    Two Superfund Sites.
    See 1288
    Pilot-Scale Incineration  of PCB-Contaminat-
    ed Sediments from the Hot Spot of the New
    Bedford Harbor Superfund Site.
    See 1291
    Superfund Engineering Issue: Issues Affect-
    ing the Applicability and Success of Remedi-
    al/Removal  Incineration Projects.
    See 1308
INCINERATION RESEARCH FACILITY
    Pilot-Scale  Incineration  of Contaminated
    Sludges  from the Bofors-Nobel  Superfund
    Site.
    See 1289
INCINERATORS
    American Combustion  Pyretron Destruction
    System. Applications Analysis Report.
    See 1193
    Mobile Incineration: An  Analysis  of the  In-
    dustry.
    See 1480
    Operations  and  Research at the U.S. EPA
    Incineration   Research  Facility:   Annual
    Report for FY91.
    See 1484
    Pilot-Scale  Incineration  of Comtarninated
    Soils  from  the  Drake  Chemical  Superfund
    Site.
    See 1522
    Pilot-Scale  Incineration  of  Contaminated
    Sludges from the  Bofors-Nobel  Superfund
    Site.
    See 1289
    Pilot-Scale Incineration of Contaminated Soil
    from the Purity Oil Sales and McColl Super-
    fund Sites.
    See 1290
    Behavior of Arsenic in a Rotary Kiln Inciner-
    ator (Journal Version).
    See 1204
    Comparison of Organic Emissions from Haz-
    ardous Waste Incinerators  versus the 1990
    Toxic Release Inventory Air Releases.
    See 1397
    Potential Surrogate Metals for  Incinerator
    Trial Burns.
    See 1486
    SITE  Demonstration of the American Com-
    bustion  Pyretron Oxygen-Enhanced Burner.
    See 1299
    Retech,  Inc., Plasma  Centrifugal  Furnace:
    Applications Analysis Report.
    See 1295
    Superfund Engineering Issue: Considerations
    for Evaluating the Impact of Metals Partition-
    ing during the Incineration  of  Contaminated
    Soils  from Superfund Sites.
    See 1534
    Technology Evaluation Report  of  Retech,
    Inc.,  Plasma Centrifugal Furnace. Volume 1.
    See 1340
    Technology Evaluation Report  of  Retech,
    Inc.,  Plasma Centrifugal Furnace. Volume 2.
    See 1341
    Technology Evaluation Report: Site  Program
    Demonstration of a Trial Excavation at the
    McColl Superfund Site.
    See 1349
 INDEXES (DOCUMENTATION)
    Environmental  Monitoring  Methods  Index
    (EMMI),  Version  1.0  (5 - User LAN)  (for
     Microcomputers).
    See 1238
    Environmental  Monitoring  Methods  Index
    (EMMI), Version 1.0 (for Microcomputers).
    See 1239
    Index to the Monthly Hotline Report Ques-
    tions (June 1982 to December 1991).
    See 0139
INDIANA
    National Priorities List Sites: Indiana.
    See 0187
    National Priorities List Sites: Indiana.
    See 0188
    National Priorities List Sites: Indiana,  1992.
    See 0189
    Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
    PRP Listing by Site for Indiana.
    See 0657
    Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
    PRP Listing by Site for Indiana.
    See 0658
    Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
    PRP Listing by Site for Indiana.
    See 0659
INDICATOR SPECIES
    Criteria for Choosing  Indicator  Species for
    Ecological Risk Assessments at Superfund
    Sites (90-6402).
    See 1224
INDIGENOUS MICROORGANISMS
    Citizen's Guide to Using Indigenous and Ex-
    ogenous  Microorganisms in  Bioremediation.
    See 0461
INDOOR AIR POLLUTION
    Assessing Potential Indoor Air  Impacts for
    Superfund  Sites.   Air/Superfund  National
    Technical Guidance Study  Series.
    See 1395
    Options for Developing and  Evaluating Miti-
    gation  Strategies for  Indoor Air Impacts at
    CERCLA   Sites.  Air/Superfund  National
    Technical  Guidance Study  Series, Report
    ASF-36.
    See 1415
INDUSTRIAL HYGIENE
    Health Effects Assessment for Benzene.
    See 1035
    Health Effects Assessment for Cadmium.
    See 1036
    Health Effects Assessment for  Carbon Tet-
    rachloride.
    See 1037
    Health Effects Assessment for Chlordane.
    See 1038
    Health Effects  Assessment for Chloroben-
    zene.
    See 1039
    Health Effects  Assessment for  Chloroform.
    See 1040
    Health Effects  Assessment for DDT.
    See 1041
    Health Effects Assessment for  Methyl Ethyl
    Ketone.
    See 1042
    Health  Effects Assessment  for  Methyiene
    Chloride.
    See 1043
     Health Effects Assessment for Naphthalene.
    See 1044
     Health Effects Assessment for Phenol.
     See 1045
     Health Effects Assessment for Styrene.
     See 1046
     Health  Effects Assessment for Tetrachlor-
     oethylene.
     See 1047
     Health Effects Assessment for Trichloroethy-
     lene.
     See 1048
          i|

-------
                                                        SUBJECT INDEX
                                                                                                                        INSPECTION
    Health Effects Assessment for Xylenes.
    See 1049
    Health Effects Assessment for 2,4,5-Trichlor-
    ophenoxy Acetic Acid (2,4,5-T).
    See 1050
    Updated Health Effects Assessment for Ace-
    tone.
    See 1080
 INDUSTRIAL SAFETY
    Estimation of the Cost of  Using  Chemical
    Protective Clothing.
    See 1244
 INDUSTRIAL WASTE TREATMENT
    CERCLA Site Discharges to POTWs: Guid-
    ance Manual.
    See 1576
    Technology  Evaluation  Report: SITE Pro-
    gram  Demonstration Test  Horsehead Re-
    source Development Company, Inc., Flame
    Reactor Technology, Monaca, Pennsylvania.
    See 1353
 INDUSTRIAL WASTES
    Ecosystem  Effects of  Superfund. National
    Priority List Sites in Industrial Landscapes: A
    Framework for Policy Decisions.
    See 0135
    Overview of Selected  EPA  (Environmental
    Protection Agency) Regulations and  Guid-
    ance  Affecting  POTW  (Publicly  Owned
    Treatment Works) Management.
    See 0432
    Use  of  'Seienastrum  capricornutum' to
    Assess the Toxicity Potential of Surface and
    Ground  Water Contamination Caused by
    Chromium Waste.
    See 1367
    Tracking Toxic  Substances at Industrial Fa-
    cilities: Engineering  Mass Balance  versus
    Materials Accounting.
    See 1362
INDUSTRIES
    Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
    PRP National Listing Alphabetically by Party
    Name.
    See 0826
INFORMATION CENTERS
    Superfund Information Repositories and Ad-
    ministrative Records: Introduction for Librar-
    ians.
    See 0497
INFORMATION DISSEMINATION
    Superfund  Technical   Assistance  Grant
    (TAG)  Handbook: Applying for Your Grant
    See 0500
    Superfund  Technical   Assistance  Grant
    (TAG)   Handbook:  The  Application  Forms
    with Instructions.
    See 0501
INFORMATION MANAGEMENT
    Index  to the  Monthly Hotline Report Ques-
    tions (June 1982 to December 1991).
    See 0139
    Inside  the Hotline:  A Compilation  of  1991
    Monthly Hotline Reports.
    See 0140
    Superfund Program and  Information  Man-
    agement Update. Volume 1, Number 1, No-
    vember 1993.
    See 0123
INFORMATION SYSTEMS
    Accessing Federal  Data Bases for Contami-
    nated  Site Clean-Up Technologies  (Second
    Edition).
    See 1189
    CERCLIS - WasteLAN - CleanLAN.
    See 0015
    Superfund Soils Data Management System.
    See 1536
    Vendor Information System  for Innovative
    Treatment Technologies (VISITT). Number 1.
    See 1370
INFRARED SPECTROMETERS
    Long-Path  FTIR Measurements of  Volatile
    Organic Compounds in an Industrial Setting
    (July 1989-April 1991).
    See 1413
INNOVATIVE TREATMENT TECHNOLOGIES
    Carver-Greenfield   Process  (Trade  Name)
    Dehydro-Tech  Corporation.   Applications
    Analysis Report.
    See 1207
    Chemical    Waste   Management,    Inc.
    PO*WW*ER  (Trade   Name)  Evaporation-
    Catalytic Oxidation Technology. Technology
    Evaluation Report. Volume 1.
    See 1213
    Chemical    Waste   Management,    Inc.
    PO*WW*ER  (Trade   Name)  Evaporation-
    Catalytic Oxidation Technology. Technology
    Evalution Report. Volume 2.
    See 1214
    Citizen's Guide to Air Sparging.
    See 0452
    Citizen's Guide to Bioventing.
    See 0453
    Citizen's Guide to In situ Soil Flushing.
    See 0456
    Citizen's  Guide to Innovative  Treatment
    Technologies   for  Contaminated   Soils,
    Sludges, Sediments and Debris.
    See 0457
    Citizen's Guide to  Using Indigenous and Ex-
    ogenous  Microorganisms in Bioremediation.
    See 0461
    CWM PO*WW*ER (Trade  Name) Evapora-
    tion-Catalytic Oxidation Technology: Applica-
    tions Analysis Report.
    See 1225
    Evaluation  of  Soil  Venting  Application.
    Ground Water Issue.
    See 1505
    Innovative Treatment  Technologies:  Semi-
    Annual Status Report. (Third Edition).
    See 1275
    Literature Survey of Innovative Technologies
    for  Hazardous  Waste Site Remediation,
    1987-1991.
    See 1281
    Pilot-Scale Demonstration of a Slurry-Phase
    Biological Reactor for Creosote-Contaminat-
    ed Soil. Applications Analysis Report.
    See 1426
    Chemical Stabilization of Mixed Organic and
    Metal Compounds. EPA SITE Program Dem-
    onstration of the Silicate Technology Corpo-
    ration Process.
    See 1212
    Control Technology: 1992  Update  of U.S.
    EPA's  Superfund   Innovative  Technology
    Evaluation (SITE) Emerging Technology Pro-
    gram.
    See 1223
    SITE Emerging  Technologies Project: Bab-
    cock and Wilcox Cyclone Vitrification.
   See 1303
   Superfund Innovative Technology Evaluation
    Program:  Progress and  Accomplishments,
    Fiscal Year 1990.  A Fourth Report  to Con-
   See 1312
   Superfund Innovative Technology Evaluation
   Program:  Progress  and Accomplishments
   Fiscal Year 1991. A 5th Report to Congress.
   See 1313
   Superfund Innovative Technology Evaluation
   Program: Technology Profiles, Fifth Edition.
   See 1315
    Synopses of Federal  Demonstrations of In-
    novative Site Remediation Technologies.
    See 1324
    Tech Trends (Number 10).
    See 1330
    Technology Evaluation Report: Babcock and
    Wilcox Cyclone Furnace Vitrification  Tech-
    nology. Volume 1.
    See 1337
    Technology Evaluation Report: Babcock and
    Wilcox Cyclone Furnace Vitrification  Tech-
    nology. Volume 2.
    See 1338
    Technology Evaluation Report of Retech's
    Plasma Centrifugal Furnace. Volume 1.
    See 1342
    Technology Evaluation Report of Retech's
    Plasma Centrifugal Furnace. Volume 2.
    See 1343
    Toronto Harbour Commissioners  (THC) Soil
    Recycle Treatment Train. Applications Analy-
    sis Report.
    See 1544
INORGANIC COMPOUNDS
    Inorganic  Contract Compliance  Screening
    System (ICCSS) Software  (1LM02.1 Version
    2) (for Microcomputers).
    See 0036
    Inorganic  Contract Compliance  Screening
    System (ICCSS) Software  (ILM02.1 Version
    3) (for Microcomputers).
    See 0037
    Inorganic  Contract Compliance  Screening
    System (ICCSS) Software  (ILM02.1 Version
    5) (for Microcomputers).
    See 0039
    Inorganic  Contract Compliance  Screening
    System  (ICCSS)  Software  (SOW  March
    1990) (Version 1) (for Microcomputers).
    See 0040
    Inorganic  Contract Compliance  Screening
    System Software for  the PC (SOW March
    1990 Version 1). User Manual.
    See 0041
    USEPA Contract Laboratory Program Nation-
    al Functional Guidelines for  Inorganic Data
    Review.
    See 0997
INORGANIC CONTRACT COMPLIANCE
SCREENING SYSTEM
    Inorganic  Contract Compliance  Screening
    System (ICCSS) Software  (ILM02.1 Version
    2) (for Microcomputers).
    See 0036
    Inorganic  Contract Compliance  Screening
    System (ICCSS) Software  (ILM02.1 Version
    3) (for Microcomputers).
    See 0037
    Inorganic  Contract Compliance  Screening
    System  (ICCSS)  Software  (SOW  March
    1990) (Version 1) (for Microcomputers).
    See 0040
    Inorganic  Contract Compliance  Screening
    System Software for the PC (SOW March
    1990 Version 1). User Manual.
    See 0041
INSECTICIDES
    Pilot-Scale Incineration of Contaminated Soil
    from the  Chemical Insecticide Corporation
    Superfund Site.
    See 1523
INSPECTION
    Guidance for  Performing  Site Inspections
    under CERCLA.
    See 0343
                                                                                                                            SU-43

-------
        INSTALLATION MANUALS
          ! Guidance on Sailing Priorities for NPL Can-
           didate Sites.
           Sea 0344
           Gukte to Management of Investigation-De-
           rivod Wastes.
           Sea 0345
          - Installation  Restoratton Program Technical
          , Support  Document for Record  of Decision,
           Tataltna Air Force "Station LRRS Site.
           Sea 1277
           Management    of    Investigation-Derived
           Wastes during Site Inspections.
           See 0349
           Procedures to Ensure that CLP Laboratories
           Are Not  Paid for Non-Compliant or Unuse-
           ablaData.
           Sea 0062
        INSTALLATION MANUALS
           Reid  CertiflcaUon Tracking System  (FCTS).
           User's GukJe. Version 2.1.
          ::;See 0909
        INTEREST RATE
          : Revisions to OMB Circular A-94 on Guide-
           Bnfis  and Discount Rates for  Benefit-Cost
           Analysis,
           Sea 1107
        INTERNATIONAL WASTE TECHNOLOGY
           In-situ  Stabilization/Solidification  of  PCB
           (Polyohlorinated   Biphenyls)-Contaminated
           Soil,
           Sea 1556
        INTERSTATE TRANSPORTATION
           Notification of bu¥bf-State Shipments of Su-
           porfund Site Wastes.
           See 0429
        INTERVIEWS
          =; Ro(a pf  Cornmuqjty Interviews in the Devel-
           opment oJ a Community  Relations Program
            for Remedial Response.
            S080485
            Superfund   Fact  Sheet:  Community Inter-
          «!" views.
            Sea 0490
        IONS  "'   '_	|. . ',  '"^   '	[  t
            Metals Testing  Report: Metal Content of En-
            vironmental Samples from Regton 4.
            See 1282
        IOWA"'1  ' '""      ""	"":
            National Priorities List Sites: Iowa.
            Sea 0190
          :: National Priorities List Sites: Iowa.
          "Sea 0191
           "National PrioritiesUst'Sites: Iowa, 1992.
            Sea 0192
          jj Site  Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
            PRP Listingi by  site for Iowa.
            See 0660
            Site  Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
            PRP Listing by  Site for Iowa.
            Sea 0661
            Sita  Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
            PRP UsUng by  Site for Iowa.
            Sea 0662
        KANSAS
            National Priorities List Sites: Kansas.
            Soa 0193
            National Priorities List Sites: Kansas.
            See 0194
            National Priorities List Sites: Kansas, 1992.
            See  0195
          I  Sita  Enforcement Tracking System  (SETS):
            PHP Listing by Site for Kansas.
            See  0663
            Site  Enforcement Tracking System  (SETS):
            PRP Listing by Sita for Kansas.
            See 0664
            Site  Enforcement Tracking System  (SETS):
            PRP Listing by Site for Kansas.
            See 0665
          SUBJECT INDEX
KENTUCKY
    National Priorities List Sites: Kentucky.
    See 0196
    National Priorities List Sites: Kentucky.
    See 0197
    National Priorities List Sites: Kentucky, 1992.
    See 0198
    Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
    PRP Listing by Site for Kentucky.
    See 0666
    Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
    PRP Listing by Site for Kentucky.
    See 0667
    Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
    PRP Listing by Site for Kentucky.
    See 0668
KILNS
    American Combustion  Pyretron Destruction
    System. Applications Analysis Report.
    See 1193
    Control of transient  Incinerator Emissions
    with an Oxygen Based Combustion System.
    See 1401
KINETICS
    Respirometric Methods for Determination of
    Biodegradability and Biodegradation Kinetics
    for  Hazardous  Organic  Pollutant  Com-
    pounds.
    See 1427
LABORATORIES
    Guidelines for Effective Management of the
    Contract Laboratory Program.  Part  1. Con-
    tract Award.  Part 2. Contract Administration.
    See 0028
    Procedures to Ensure that CLP Laboratories
    Are Not Paid for Non-Compliant or Unuse-
    able Data.
    See 0062
    USEPA Contract Laboratory Program Nation-
    al Functional Guidelines  for Organic Data
    Review.
    See 0077
    User's Guide  to Contract Laboratory Pro-
    gram.
    See 0078
    User's Guide to the Contract Laboratory Pro-
    gram.
    See 0080
 LAND APPLICATION
    Policy  for Superfund Compliance with the
    RCRA Land  Disposal Restrictions.
    See 0436
 LAND DISPOSAL
    Guidance  Documents Relating to  Landfills
    and Contaminants.
    See 1259
    Superfund LDR Guide  No.  1: Overview of
    RCRA Land  Disposal Restrictions (LDRs).
    See 0440
    Superfund LDR Guide No. 2: Complying with
    the California  List  Restrictions under Land
    Disposal Restrictions (LDRs).
    See 0441
    Superfund  LDR Guide  No.  3:  Treatment
    Standards  and  Minimum Technology Re-
    quirements under Land Disposal Restrictions
    (LDRS).
    See 0442
    Superfund LDR Guide No. 4: Complying with
    the Hammer Restrictions under  Land Dis-
    posal Restrictions (LDRs).
    See 0443
    Superfund  LDR Guide No. 5: Determining
    When Land  Disposal Restrictions (LDRs) Are
    'Applicable'  to  CERCLA Response Actions.
    See 0444
LAND DISPOSAL RESTRICTIONS
    Analysis of Treatability  Data for  Soil and
    Debris: Evaluation of  Land Ban Impact on
    Use of Superfund Treatment Technologies.
    See 1488
    Applicability of Land Disposal Restrictions to
    RCRA and CERCLA  Ground Water Treat-
    ment  Reinjection  Superfund  Management
    Review: Recommendation No. 26.
    See 1430
    Land Disposal Restrictions as Relevant and
    Appropriate Requirements for CERCLA Con-
    taminated Soil and Debris.
    See 0428
LAND MANAGEMENT
    Future Land Use Scenarios for Federal  Fa-
    cilities.
    See 0897
LAND OWNERSHIP
    Future Land Use Scenarios for Federal  Fa-
    cilities.
    See 0897
LAND POLLUTION
    Air/Superfund National Technical  Guidance
    Study Series. Database  of  Emission Rate
    Measurement Projects.
    See 1379
    Biological Assessment of Toxicity Caused by
    Chemical Constituents Eluted from Site Soils
    Collected at the Drake Chemical Superfund
    Site, Lock Haven, Clinton Co., Pennsylvania.
    See 1491
    Criteria for Choosing Indicator Species  for
    Ecological Risk Assessments at Superfund
    Sites (90-6402).
    See 1224
    Forum  on  Innovative  Hazardous  Waste
    Treatment  Technologies:  Domestic   and
    International.  Held In Atlanta, Georgia  on
    June 19-21,1989. Technical Papers.
    See 1253
    Future Land Use Scenarios for Federal Fa-
    cilities;
    See 0897
    Ground-Water Issue: Soil sampling and anal-
    ysis for volatile organic compounds.
    See 1507
    In-situ  Stabilization/Solidification  of PCB
    (Polychlorinated    Biphenyls)-Contaminated
    Soil.
    See 1556
    Aseptic Sampling of Unconsolidated Heaving
    Soils  in Saturated Zones.
    See 1489
    Description of EPA SITE Demonstration of
    the HAZCON  Stabilization Process  at the
    Douglassville, Pennsylvania  Superfund Site.
    See 1552
    EPA SITE Demonstration of the BioTrol Soil
    Washing Process.
    See 1502
    EPA SITE Demonstration of the International
    Waste Technologies/Geo-Con In situ Stabili-
    zation/Solidification Process.
    See 1553
    On-Site  Methods  for Assessing Chemical
    Impact on the Soil Environment Using Earth-
    worms: A Case Study at  the  Baird  and
    McGuire Superfund Site, Holbrook, Massa-
    chusetts.
    See 1521
    USEPA Contract Laboratory Program Nation-
    al Functional Guidelines for  Inorganic Data
    Review.
    See 0997
         SU-44
,. Hi* ...... t> i , jl
                ...... j ..... iiiiiil ......... ,: ii ..... i ....... MIMIi ............... IlillPi J Uui .ia1 vi
                                                        • . iin-iii ......... '.- ........ :,i i; : ....... ......... i ...... iiiiJI! A,, ........ ............ it' ...... .1- . ..... ife ........ L
                                                                                                              lii'iiniuil;	iiiiHiililili,'..,	,1	IIIJ	iJi;	'!:.

-------
                                                        SUBJECT INDEX
                                                                                                                          LAWSUITS
LAND POLLUTION ABATEMENT
    ARARs Q's  and A's:  State Ground-Water
    Antidegradation Issues.
    See 0402
    Technology  Evaluation  Report:  Chemfix
    Technologies, Inc. Solidification/Stabilization
    Process, Clackamas, Oregon. Volume 1.
    See 1566
LAND POLLUTION CONTROL
    AWD  Technologies  Integrated  AquaDetox
    (Trade Name)/SVE Technology: Applications
    Analysis Report.
    See 1202
    BioGenesis  (Trade  Name)  Soil  Washing
    Technology: Innovative Technology Evalua-
    tion Report.
    See 1490
    DuPont/Oberlin  Microfiltration  Technology.
    Applications Analysis Report.
    See 1584
    Evaluation and Testing  of a Protocol  to De-
    termine the Aerobic Degradation Potential of
    Hazardous Waste Constituents in Soil.
    See 1503
    Guide  for  Conducting  Treatability Studies
    under CERCLA: Soil Washing. Interim Guid-
    ance.
    See 1165
    Guide  for  Conducting  Treatability Studies
    under CERCLA: Soil Washing: Quick  Refer-
    ence Fact Sheet.
    See 1166
    In situ Soil Flushing. Engineering Bulletin.
    See 1510
    Literature Review Summary of Metals Ex-
    traction Processes  Used  to Remove Lead
    from Soils.
    See 1518
    On-Site Engineering  Report  for the  Low-
    Temperature Thermal Desorption Pilot-Scale
    Test on Contaminated Soil.
    See 1519
    Pilot-Scale  Incineration  of Comtaminated
    Soils from  the Drake Chemical Superfund
    Site.
    See 1522
    Reductive Dehalogenation of Organic Con-
    taminants  in   Soils  and  Ground  Water.
    Ground Water Issue.
    See 1527
    Control  of Aromatic  Waste Air  Streams  by
    Soil Bioreactors.
    See 1496
    Demonstration of Microfiltration Technology.
    See 1228
    EPA Site Demonstration of the Terra Vac In
   situ Vacuum  Extraction Process in Grove-
    land, Massachusetts. (Site Program Update:
    Part VII).
   See 1243
    Extraction and Recovery  of Lead  Species
   from Soil.
   See 1506
   U.S. EPA SITE Demonstration of AWD Tech-
   nologies' AquaDetox/SVE System.
   See 1363
   Will Soil Working Work  for the Sand  Creek
   Superfund Site.
   See 1548
   Superfund Emergency Response Actions: A
   Summary of  Federally  Funded Removals.
   Volume 3.
   See 0318
   Tech Trends (Number 10).
   See 1330
   Technology  Evaluation Report:  Biotrol Soil
   Washing System for Treatment  of a Wood
   Preserving Site. Volume 1.
   See 1539
     Technology  Evaluation  Report: Biotrol Soil
     Washing System for Treatment of a Wood
     Preserving Site. Volume 2, Part A.
     See 1540
     Technology  Evaluation  Report: Biotrol Soil
     Washing System for Treatment of a Wood
     Preserving Site. Volume 2, Part B.
     See 1541
     Technology  Evaluation  Report  CHEMFIX
     Technologies,  Inc., Solidification/Stabiliza-
     tion Process, Clackamas, Oregon. Volume 2.
     See 1339
     Technology  Evaluation  Report:  SITE Pro-
     gram Demonstration of the DuPont/Oberlin
     Microfiltration Technology.
     See 1350
     Technology Evaluation Report: Site Program
     Demonstration  Test.  Accutech  Pneumatic
     Fracturing Extraction and Hot Gas Injection,
     Phase 1. Volume 1.
     See 1352
     Technology Evaluation Report: Toronto Har-
     bour  Commissioners  (THC)  Soil  Recycle
     Treatment Train.
     See 1543
     Toxic Treatments  'In-situ'  Steam/Hot-Air
     Stripping Technology. Applications Analysis
     Report.
     See 1545
LAND POLLUTION DETECTION
     Military  Base Closures: Guidance  on EPA
    Concurrence in the Identification of Unconta-
    minated   Parcels  under CERCLA Section
     120(h)(4).
    See 0899
LAND USE
    Some Major  Factors Important in Establish-
    ing  Land Use Policy for Remediated Super-
    fund Sites.
    See 0308
LANDFILLS
    Engineering Bulletin: Landfill Covers.
    See 1233
    Presumptive  Remedy for CERCLA  Municipal
    Landfill Sites.
    See 1105
LANSDOWNE (PENNSYLVANIA)
    Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Clean-
    up  Efforts Nationwide,  Fall  1992.  (Lans-
    downe Radioactive  Residence  Site Profile).
    See 0946
LASER INDUCED REACTIONS
    SITE-Emerging Technologies: Laser Induced
    Photochemical  Oxidative  Destruction   of
    Toxic  Organics in  Leachates  and Ground-
    waters.
    See 1591
LAW ENFORCEMENT
    CERCLA  Enforcement Policy  Compendium
    Update.
    See 0516
    Procedural Guidance on  Treatment of Insur-
    ers under CERCLA.
    See 0589
    Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
    National  PRP Listing Alphabetically by PRP
    Name.
    See 0616
    Site Enforcement Tracking System  (SETS):
    PRP Listing by Site for Region 1.
    See 0739
    Site Enforcement Tracking System  (SETS):
    PRP Listing by Site for Region 1.
    See 0740
    Site Enforcement Tracking System  (SETS):
    PRP Listing by Site for Region 2.
    See 0744
    Site Enforcement Tracking System  (SETS):
    PRP Listing by Site for Region 2.
    See 0745
     Site Enforcement Tracking System  (SETS):
     PRP Listing by Site for Region 3.
     See 0749
     Site Enforcement Tracking System  (SETS):
     PRP Listing by Site for Region 4.
     See 0753
     Site Enforcement Tracking System  (SETS):
     PRP Listing by Site for Region 4.
     See 0754
     Site Enforcement Tracking System  (SETS):
     PRP Listing by Site for Region 5.
     See 0758
     Site Enforcement Tracking System  (SETS):
     PRP Listing by Site for Region 5.
     See 0759
     Site Enforcement Tracking System  (SETS):
     PRP Listing by Site for Region 6.
     See 0763
     Site Enforcement Tracking System  (SETS):
     PRP Listing by Site for Region 6.
     See 0764
     Site Enforcement Tracking System  (SETS):
     PRP Listing by Site for Region 7.
     See 0768
     Site Enforcement Tracking System  (SETS):
     PRP Listing fay Site for Region 7.
     See 0769
     Site Enforcement Tracking System  (SETS):
     PRP Listing by Site for Region 8.
     See 0773
     Site Enforcement Tracking System  (SETS):
     PRP Listing by Site for Region 8.
     See 0774
     Site Enforcement Tracking System  (SETS):
     PRP Listing by Site for Region 9.
     See 0779
     Site Enforcement Tracking System  (SETS):
     PRP Listing by Site for Region 10.
     See 0783
     Site Enforcement Tracking System  (SETS):
     PRP Listing by Site for Region 10.
     See 0784
    Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
    PRP National  Listing Alphabetically by Party
     Name.
    See 0830
    Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
    PRP National Listing by Site.
    See 0836
    Waiver of Headquarters Approval for Issu-
    ance of RD/RA Special Notice Letters at the
    Time of  ROD Signature  from  OERR and
    OWPE.
    See 0893
LAW (JURISPRUDENCE)
    Interim  Model CERCLA Section 122(g) (4)
    De  Minimis   Waste  Contributor  Consent
    Decree and Administrative Order on Con-
    sent.
    See 0565
    Political Subdivision Involvement in  Super-
    fund.
    See 0480
    RCRA, Superfund Monthly  Hot Line Reports.
    See 0303
    Some Major Factors Important in Establish-
    ing  Land  Use  Policy for Remediated  Super-
    fund Sites.
    See 0308
LAWS
    CERCLA  Compliance with  Other   Laws
    Manual. Part 1. Interim Final.
    See 0409
LAWSUITS
    Guidance  on CERCLA Settlements with De
    Micromis Waste Contributors.
    See 0547
                                                                                                                            SU-45

-------
LEAD ACID BATTERIES
                                                       SUBJECT INDEX
   :Modo) Litigation Report for CERCLA Bec-
    kons 106 and 107 and RCRA Section 7003.
    Se«0576
LEAD ACID BATTERIES  '""';
    Control Technologies for Defunct lead Bat-
    tocy Recycling Sites:  Overview and Recent
    Developments. Volume 3.
    Soo 1220
   , Selection of Control Technologies for Reme-
   : dtotlon of Lead Battery Recycling Sites. (En-
    glncoring Bulletin).
    Sao 1296
LEAD INORGANIC COMPOUNDS
    Extraction  and Recovery of Lead Species
    frornSoH.
    See 1506
LEAD (METAL)
    Emergency Responders  Agreements   for
   1 Fund-Lead Remedial Actions.
    Sea 1001
    Incineration Data on Arsenic and Lead Emis-
    sions.
    Sea 1267
    Literature  Review  Summary of Metals  Ex-
    traction  Processes Used to Remove Lead
    from Soils.
    See 1518
   ! Extraction  and Recovery of Lead  Species
    fromSotl.
   	Sea 1506
    Superfund Engineering issue: Treatment of
    Load-Contaminated Soils.
    Sea 1535
    X-ray Fluorescence Survey of Lead Contami-
   L" "rated Residential Soils In  LeadviHe, Colora-
    do: A Case Study.
   :' Sea 1549
LEllSLATtOfJ	"	'""
    Suporfund Reform Act of 1994.
    See 0332
LIABILITIES
    Covenants Not to Sue under SARA.
    See 0526
    Homeowners   Exempted  from  Superfund
   	Cleanup Costs: National Policy Overview.
    See 0426
    Interim Guidance on Notice Letters, Negotia-
    tions, and Information Exchange.
    See 0560
    Mode) Notes Letters.
    Sea 0577
    Streamlined Approach for Settlements with
   :::„ De  Mtnimls   Waste   Contributors  under
    CERCLA Section 122(g)(1)(A).
    Sett 0870
 LIENS,
    Supplemental Guidance on Federal Super-
    fund Uens.
    See 0885
 LIQUID FILTERS
    DuPont/Oberlln Microfiltration  Technology.
   !' Applications Analysis Report.
    See 1584
 LIQUID WASTES
    Air Stripping of Aqueous Solutions. Engineer-
    ing Bulletin.
    See 1371	
    Chemical    Waste    Management,    Inc.
   „ PO*WW'ER  grade  Name)  Evaporatlon-
   *•'• Catalytic Oxidation Technology. Technology
     Evaluation Report. Volume 1.
    See 1213
    Chemical    Waste    Management,    Inc.
     PQ'WWER   (Trade  Name)   Evaporation-
   ',  Catalytic Oxidation Technology. Technology
   I  Evolution  Report Volume 2.
    Sea 1214
   CWM PO*WW*ER  (Trade Name) Evapora-
   tion-Catalytic Oxidation Technology: Applica-
   tions Analysis Report.
   See 1225
   DuPont/Oberlin  Microfiltration  Technology.
   Applications Analysis Report.
   See 1584
   Evaluation of the Likelihood of DNAPL Pres-
   ence at NPL Sites: National Results.
   See 1448
   Demonstration of Microfiltration Technology.
   See 1228
   Rotating Biological  Contactors.  Engineering
   Bulletin.
   See 1297
   Technology Evaluation Report:  SITE  Pro-
   gram Demonstration of the DuPont/Oberlin
   Microfiltration Technology.
   See 1350
LISTINGS
   FACT  BOOK: National Priorities List under
   the Original Hazard Ranking System, 1981-
   1991.
   See 0340
LOCAL GOVERNMENT
   Model Informational Notice Letter to Local
   Governments.
   See 0575
LOSS FUNCTION
   Asymmetric Loss Function for Superfund Re-
    mediation Decisions.
   See 1200
LOUISIANA
    National Priorities List Sites: Louisiana.
    See 0199
    National Priorities List Sites: Louisiana.
    See 0200
    National Priorities List Sites: Louisiana, 1992.
    See 0201
    Site Enforcement Tracking System  (SETS):
    PRP Listing by Site for Louisiana.
    See 0669
    Site Enforcement Tracking System  (SETS):
    PRP Listing by Site for Louisiana.
    See 0670
    Site Enforcement Tracking System  (SETS):
    PRP Listing by Site for Louisiana.
    See 0671
MAINE
    National Priorities List Sites: Maine.
    See 0202
    National Priorities List Sites: Maine.
    See 0203
    National Priorities  List Sites:  Maine, 1992.
    See 0204
    Site Enforcement Tracking System  (SETS):
    PRP Listing by Site for Maine.
    See 0672
    Site Enforcement  Tracking System  (SETS):
    PRP Listing by Site for Maine.
    See 0673
    Site Enforcement  Tracking System  (SETS):
    PRP Listing by Site for Maine.
    See 0674
 MANAGEMENT
    Management Review  of the Superfund Pro-
    gram.
    See 0101
    Management Review  of the Superfund Pro-
    gram: Implementation Plan.
    See 0102
 MANAGEMENT PLANNING
    Guidance  for Data Useability in Risk Assess-
    ment.
    See 1030
    Guidance  for Data Useability in Risk Assess-
    ment. Interim Report.
    See 1032
    Importance of Quality for Collection of Envi-
    ronmental Samples. Planning, Implementing,
    and Assessing  Field Sampling  Quality  at
    CERCLA Sites.
    See 0919
    Status of Key SACM  Program Management
    Issues: Interim Guidance, Volume 1, Number
    1, December 1992.
    See 0113
MANAGEMENT REVIEW
    Planning for Sufficient Community Relations
    (Superfund Management Review: No. 43A).
    See 0108
    Superfund Responsiveness Summaries (Su-
    perfund  Management Review: Recommen-
    dation Number 43E).
    See 0125
MANAGEMENT REVIEWS
    Approval of Long Term Contracting Strategy
    for  Superfund   (Superfund   Management
    Review: Recommendation E.2).
    See 0018
MANUALS
    Air/Superfund National  Technical Guidance
    Study Series. Air Stripper Design Manual.
    See 1374
    CERCLA  Compliance  with  Other  Laws
    Manual.  Part 1. Interim Rnal.
    See 0409
    CERCLA Site Discharges to POTWS Treat-
    ability Manual.
    See 1577
    Citizens' Guidance Manual for the Technical
    Assistance Grant Program.
    See 0463
    Hazard  Ranking System Guidance Manual.
    See 0346
    Hazard  Ranking System Guidance Manual.
    See 0347
    Superfund Desk  Reference  for Municipali-
    ties.
    See 0486
    Superfund Docket  Operations Manual  for
    Rulemaking Activities.
    See 0081
 MANUFACTURING
    Guidelines for  the Cleanup  of Clandestine
    Drug Laboratories.
    See 1007
 MARIANA ISLANDS
    Site  Enforcement Tracking  System (SETS):
    PRP Listing by Site  for Northern Marianas.
    See 0720
    Site  Enforcement Tracking  System (SETS):
    PRP Listing by Site  for Northern Marianas.
    See 0721
    Site  Enforcement Tracking  System (SETS):
    PRP Listing by Site for Northern Marianas.
    See 0722
 MARINE BIOLOGY
    Using the DNA Alkaline Unwinding Assay to
    Detect DNA Damage in Laboratory and Envi-
    ronmentally Exposed Cells and Tissues.
    See 1368
 MARINE DISPOSAL
    Technology  Evaluation  Report:  SITE  Pro-
    gram.   CF  Systems  Organics  Extraction
    System,  New   Bedford,   Massachusetts.
    Volume 1.
    See 1346
    Technology  Evaluation Report:  SITE  Pro-
    gram.   CF  Systems  Organics  Extraction
    System,  New  Bedford,   Massachusetts.
    Volume 2.
    See 1347
 SU-46

-------
                                                         SUBJECT INDEX
                                                                                                                              METALS
 MARYLAND
     National Priorities List Sites: Maryland.
     See 0205
     National Priorities List Sites: Maryland.
     See 0206
     National Priorities List Sites: Maryland, 1992
     See 0207
     Site Enforcement Tracking  System (SETS):
     PRP Listing by Site for Maryland.
     See 0675
     Site Enforcement Tracking  System (SETS):
     PRP Listing by Site for Maryland.
     See 0676
     Site Enforcement Tracking  System (SETS):
     PRP Listing by Site for Maryland.
     See 0677
 MASS BALANCE
     Tracking Toxic Substances  at Industrial Fa-
     cilities:  Engineering Mass  Balance  versus
     Maten'als Accounting.
     See 1362
 MASSACHUSETTS
     National Priorities List Sites: Massachusetts
     See 0208
     National Priorities List Sites: Massachusetts,
     1992.
     See 0210
     Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
     PRP Listing by Site for Massachusetts.
     See 0678
     Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
     PRP Listing by Site for Massachusetts.
     See 0679
     Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
     PRP Listing by Site for Massachusetts.
    See 0680
 MATERIALS HANDLING
    Control of Air Emissions from Materials Han-
    dling during Remediation. Engineering Bulle-
    tin.
    See 1398
    Survey of Materials-Handling Technologies
    Used at Hazardous Waste Sites.
    See 1323
MATERIALS RECOVERY
    Horsehead Resource Development Compa-
    ny, Inc. Flame Reactor Technology: Applica-
    tions Analysis Report.
    See 1263
    Solvent Extraction Treatment.
    See 1306
MATHEMATICAL MODELS
    Air/Superfund National  Technical Guidance
    Study Series.  Models  for  Estimating  Air
    Emission  Rates from Superfund Remedial
    Actions.
    See 1388
    Application of a Water Quality Assessment
    Modeling System at a Superfund Site.
    See 1573
    Comparison of a Revised Area Source Algo-
    rithm for the  Industrial Source  Complex
    Short Term Model and  Wind Tunnel  Data
    See 1216
    New Approach and Methodologies for Char-
    acterizing  the Hydrogeologic Properties of
    Aquifers.
    See 1470
    New Methods for Modeling the Transport of
    Metals from Mineral Processing Wastes into
    Surface Waters.
    See 1590
    Review and Evaluation of Area Source Dis-
    persion Algorithms for Emission Sources at
    Superfund Sites.
    See 1416
    Superfund  Accelerated  Cleanup   Model
    (SACM). Volume  1,  Number 4, November
    1992.
    See 0122
MCINTOSH (ALABAMA)
    Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Clean-
    up Efforts Nationwide, Fall 1992. (Ciba-Geigy
    Corporation, Mclntosh, Alabama).
    See 0944
MEDICAL WASTES
    Effect of OSHA's  Bloodborne  Pathogens
    Standard on  Hazardous Waste Cleanup Ac-
    tivities.
    See 1026
MEETINGS
    Abstract Proceedings: Forum on Innovative
    Hazardous Waste Treatment Technologies;
    Domestic and International (2nd).  Held in
    Philadelphia,  Pennsylvania  on  May 15-17,
    1990.
    See 1186
    Abstract Proceedings: Superfund Technical
    Support  Project  General Meeting.  Held in
    Athens, Georgia on December 3-6, 1990.
    See 1187
    Annual  RREL Research Symposium (20th)
    Abstract Proceedings.  Held in  Cincinnati,
    Ohio on March 15-17,1994.
    See 1184
    Forum  on  Innovative  Hazardous  Waste
    Treatment  Technologies:   Domestic  and
    International.  Held in Atlanta,  Georgia on
    June 19-21, 1989. Abstract Proceedings.
    See 1252
    Forum  on  Innovative  Hazardous  Waste
    Treatment  Technologies:   Domestic  and
    International.  Held  in Atlanta,  Georgia on
    June 19-21,1989. Technical Papers.
    See 1253
    Forum  on  Innovative  Hazardous  Waste
   Treatment Technologies (3rd): Domestic and
    International. Held in Dallas, Texas on June
    11-13, 1991. Technical Papers.
   See 1254
    Immobilization Technology Seminar: Speaker
   Slide Copies and Supporting Information.
   See 1555
   International  Conference on New Frontiers
   for  Hazardous Waste Management (Third)
   Proceedings. Held in  Pittsburgh,  Pennsylva-
   nia on September 10-13, 1989.
   See 1278
   International Symposium on Field Screening
   Methods  for  Hazardous Wastes and Toxic
   Chemicals (2nd),  Proceedings.  Held in  Las
   Vegas, Nevada on February 12-14,1991.
   See 1279
   Meeting Summary: National Advisory Council
   on  Environmental Policy and  Technology
   (1st). Subcommittee  on  Radiation Cleanup
   Regulation. Held in Washington,  DC. on  Oc-
   tober 18-19, 1993.
   See 1059
   NACEPT  Meeting. Held in Crystal City,  Vir-
   ginia on February 11,1994.
   See 0144
   Physical/Chemical Treatment of Hazardous
   Waste Sites: Speaker Slide Copies and Sup-
   porting Information.
   See 1287
   Presentations   EPA-State  Soil   Standards
   Conference. Held  in Crystal City, Virginia on
   January 29, 1991.
   See 1524
   Quantifying Effects  in  Ecological  Site As-
   sessments: Biological and Statistical Consid-
   erations.
   See 1063
   Remedial Action, Treatment, and Disposal of
   Hazardous Waste.   Proceedings   of  the
   Annual Hazardous Waste Research Sympo-
   sium (17th). Held in Cincinnati, Ohio on April
   9-11, 1991.
   See  1135
     Potential  Surrogate  Metals  for  Incinerator
     Trial Burns.
     See 1486
     Superfund Engineering Issue: Treatment of
     Lead-Contaminated Soils.
     See 1535
     Superfund: EPA/ICMA Superfund Revitaliza-
     tion Conference. Held in Chicago, Illinois on
     November 12-13, 1992.
     See 0319
     Superfund: EPA/ICMA Superfund Revitaliza-
     tion Conference.   Held  in  San  Francisco,
     California on February 1-2, 1993.
     See 0320
     Superfund  Policy Forum Update,  Volume 1,
     Number 1,  February 1992.
     See 0324
     Superfund: Report of the EPA  Superfund
     Revitalization Public Meeting Held on June
     24,1992. Volumes  1 and 2.
     See 0333
 MEMBRANES
     Membrane  Treatment of Wood  Preserving
     Site Groundwater by SBP Technologies, Inc.
     Applications Analysis Report.
     See 1468
     SITE Program  Demonstration of the SBP
     Technologies,   Inc.,  Membrane   Filtration
     System on Creosote-Contaminated Water.
     See 1592
 MERCURY (METAL)
     Emerging Technologies:  Bio-Recovery Sys-
     tems Removal and Recovery of Metal Ions
     from Groundwater.
     See 1439
     Emerging Technologies:  Bio-Recovery Sys-
     tems Removal and Recovery of Metal Ions
     from Groundwater. Appendices.
     See 1440
     Extraction   of  Mercury  from  Groundwater
     Using Immobilized Algae.
     See 1450
 METAL INDUSTRY
     Draft Record of Decision for  the  Aluminum
    Smelter  Conservation/Modernization  Pro-
    gram.
    See 1087
 METAL PARTITIONING
    Potential Surrogate Metals  for Incinerator
    Trial Burns.
    See 1486
    Superfund Engineering Issue: Considerations
    for Evaluating the Impact of Metals Partition-
    ing  during the Incineration of  Contaminated
    Soils from Superfund Sites.
    See 1534
METALS
    Emerging Technology  Report:  Metals Treat-
    ment at Superfund Sites by Absorptive Filtra-
    tion.
    See 1232
    Metals Testing Report: Metal Content of En-
    vironmental Samples from Region 4.
    See 1282
    Pilot-Scale Incineration of Contaminated Soil
    from the Chemical  Insecticide Corporation
    Superfund Site.
    See 1523
    Filtration of  Ground  Water  Samples  for
    Metals Analysis.
    See 1454
    New Methods for Modeling the Transport  of
    Metals from Mineral Processing Wastes into
    Surface Waters.
    See 1590
                                                                                                                             SU-47

-------
METHANE
                                                        SUBJECT INDEX
    Superfund Engineering Issue: Considerations
    (or Evaluating the impact of Metals Partition-
    ing during the Incineration of Contaminated
    Soils from Superfund Sites.
 •   See 1534
    Toxtelly Btoassay and Eluate~ Heavy Metals
   jl .Analysis Results of the Bench Scale Stabili-
    zation  Study  of  Soils  from  the  United
    dhrom* Superfund rM.  (National  Priority
    List) Site Corvailis, Oregon.
    See 1546
METHANE
    CERCLA Removal Actions at Methane Re-
    loase Sftes.
    Saa 0416
METHYL ETHYL KETONE
   : Wealth  Effects Assessment for Methyl Ethyl
    Kotons.
    Sea 1042
METHYL ISOCYANATE
    Superfund  Guide: Reportable Quantity Ad-
    justment for Methyl Isocyanate (MIC).
    Sea 1152
MICHIGAN
    National Priorities List Sites: Michigan.
    Sea 0211
    National Priorities List Sites: Michigan.
    Sea Q212
    National Priorities Ust Sites: Michigan, 1992.
    Saa 0213
    Sit*  Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
    PRP Listing by Site for Michigan.
    Stta Enforoemeni Tracking System (SETS):
    FRP Listing by Sle for Michigan.
    Soe 0682
    Sits Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
    PRP Listing by Site for Michigan.
    See 0683
 MICRO-COMPUTER AIDED COST
 ENGINEERING SYSTEM      '
   :: Cost   Estimating  Systems   for  Remedial
    Action Projects.
    See 1123
 HICROFILTRATION
    DuPont/Oberlln  Mlcroflltratton Technology.
    Applications Analysis Report.
   •".Sff 1584
   " Demonstration of Mfcrbflltration Technology.
    So* 1228
    Technology    Demonstration    Summary,
   ; DuPont/Oberlln Mterofiltration System, Pal-
    rrwrton, Pennsylvania. April-May 1992.
    Saa 1336
    Technology  Evaluation Report  SITE  Pro-
    gram Demonstration of the DuPont/Oberlin
    Mtcroflilration Technology.
    See 1350
 MICROORGANISMS
    Site Emerging Technologies: Bioscrubber for
   , Removing   Hazardous  Organic  Emissions
   i from Soil, Water and  Air Decontamination
    Processes.
    See 1302
   ; ..... U^B  of  Office ..... of Research and Develpp-
   ii ' ..... mont's "Bloremediation1 ........ Expertise "in' Super-
    fund Removal Program.
    See 1016
 MICROORGANISMS CONTROL (WATER)
     In situ Bforemediatton of Contaminated Un-
     saturatod Subsurface Soils.
     See 1509
 MILITARY BASE CLOSINGS
   ;;  Mftary  Base Closures: Guidance on EPA
     Concurrence in the Identification  of Unconta-
     minatod Parcels under  CERCLA  Section
     Sao 0899
MIUTARY FACILITIES
    Future Land Use Scenarios for Federal Fa-
    cilities.
    See 0897
MINE WASTES
    Application of a Water Quality Assessment
    Modeling System at a Superfund Site.
    See 1573
    Consideration  of  RCRA Requirements  in
    Performing CERCLA Responses  at Mining
    Waste Sites.
    See 0420
    Mining Sites  on the National Priorities List:
    NPL Site Summary Reports. Volume 1 (Alu-
    minum  Company  of  America  (Vancouver
    Smelter) to Cleveland Mill).
    See 0350
    Mining Sites  on the National Priorities List:
    NPL Site  Summary  Reports.  Volume  2
    (Commencement Bay Nearshore/Tideflats to
    Kerr McGee) (Kress  Creek,  Reed-Keppler
    Park, Residential Areas, Sewage Treatment
    Plant).
    See 0351
    Mining Sites  on the National Priorities List:
    NPL Site Summary Reports. Volume 3 (Kerr-
    McGee Chemical Corp. (Soda Springs Plant)
    to Ormet Corp).
    See 0352
    Mining Sites on the National Priorities List:
    NPL  Site Summary  Reports. Volume 4
    (Oronogo-Duenweg  Mining  Belt  to  Tar
    Creek).
    See 0353
    Mining Sites on the National Priorities List:
    NPL Site Summary Reports. Volume 5 (Tele-
    dyne Wah Chang to Wayne Interim Storage
    Facility/W.R. Grace).
    See 0354
    New Methods for Modeling the Transport of
    Metals from  Mineral Processing Wastes into
    Surface Waters.
    See 1590
 MINERAL PROCESSING WASTES
    Superfund Guide to RCRA  Management Re-
    quirements for  Mineral  Processing Wastes.
    See 0439
 MINING
     Evaluating Amphibian Responses in Wet-
     lands Impacted by Mining Activities in the
    Western United States.
     See 1586
     Superfund Guide to RCRA  Management Re-
     quirements for  Mineral  Processing Wastes.
     See 0439
 MINNESOTA
     National Priorities List Sites: Minnesota.
     See 0214
     National Priorities List Sites: Minnesota.
     See 0215
     National  Priorities List Sites:  Minnesota,
     1992.
     See 0216
     Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
     PRP Listing by Site for Minnesota.
     See 0684
     Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
     PRP Listing by Site for Minnesota.
     See 0685
     Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
     PRP Listing by Site for Minnesota.
     See 0686
 MISSISSIPPI
     National Priorities List Sites: Mississippi.
     See 0217
     National Priorities List Sites: Mississippi.
     See 0218
     National  Priorities  List Sites:  Mississippi,
     1992.
     See 0219
    Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
    PRP Listing by Site for Mississippi.
    See 0687
    Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
    PRP Listing by Site for Mississippi.
    See 0688
    Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
    PRP Listing by Site for Mississippi.
    See 0689
MISSOURI
    National Priorities List Sites: Missouri.
    See 0220
    National Priorities List Sites: Missouri.
    See 0221
    National Priorities List Sites: Missouri,  1992.
    See 0222
    Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
    PRP Listing by Site for Missouri.
    See 0690
    Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
    PRP Listing by Site for Missouri.
    See 0691
    Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
    PRP Listing by Site for Missouri.
    See 0692
MOBILE EQUIPMENT
    Mobile Incineration: An  Analysis of the In-
    dustry.
    See 1480
MODEL STUDIES
    Ground-Water    Modeling    Compendium.
    Model  Fact  Sheets, Descriptions, Applica-
    tions and Assessment Framework.
    See 1458
MODELS
    Instructional  Package   on  Regulatory Air
    Quality  Modeling. Part  1:  Videos on the
    'Guideline on Air Quality Models (Revised)'
    and the Model Clearinghouse (Video).
    See 1412
MODELS-SIMULATION
    Preliminary    Ranking   Evaluation   Score
    (PREscore) Version 1.1 (for Microcomput-
    ers).
    See 0372
    Preliminary    Ranking   Evaluation   Score
    (PREscore) Version 2.0 (for Microcomput-
    ers).
    See 0373
 MODULAR ORIENTED UNCERTAINTY
 SYSTEM
    AutoMOUSE:  An   Improvement  to  the
    MOUSE Computerized  Uncertainty Analysis
    System Operational Manual.
    See 1201
 MONITORING
    Guidance on Applying the Data Quality Ob-
    jectives Process for Ambient Air Monitoring
    Around Superfund Sites (Stage 3).
    See 0987
    Guidance on Applying the Data Quality Ob-
    jectives Process for Ambient Air Monitoring
    Around Superfund  Sites (Stages 1  and 2).
    See 0988
     Inorganic  Contract  Compliance Screening
    System (ICCSS) Software (for Microcomput-
    ers).
     See 0034
     Inorganic  Contract  Compliance Screening
     System (ICCSS) Software for the PC (Ver-
     sion 3/90) User Manual.
     See 0035
     Organic Contract   Compliance  Screening
     System (OCCSS) Software (for Microcom-
     puters).
     See 0047
 SU-48

-------
                                                           SUBJECT INDEX
                                                                                                            NATIONAL PRIORITIES LIST
      Organic   Contract  Compliance  Screening
      System (OCCSS) Software for the PC (Ver-
      sion 2/90) User Manual.
      See 0048
  MONMOUTH (NEW JERSEY)
      Evaluation of Waste Stabilized by the Solidi-
      tech SITE Technology.
      See 1554
  MONONGAHELA RIVER
      OPA Update: Implementation of the Oil Pol-
      lution Act of 1990. Volume 2, Number 1
      See 0934
  MONTANA
      National Priorities List Sites: Montana
      See 0223
      National Priorities List Sites: Montana.
      See 0224
      National Priorities List Sites: Montana, 1992
     See 0225
     Site Enforcement Tracking System  (SETS):
     PRP Listing by Site for Montana.
     See 0693
     Site Enforcement Tracking System  (SETS):
     PRP Listing by Site for Montana.
     See 0694
     Site Enforcement Tracking System  (SETS)-
     PRP Listing by Site for Montana.
     See 0695
 MUNICIPAL SETTLEMENT POLICY
     Municipal Settlements.
     See 0583
 MUNICIPAL WASTES
     Municipal Settlements.
     See 0583
     Report to Congress: Settlements with Munic-
     ipal  Waste  Generators  and  Transporters
     Since 1991 under the Comprehensive Envi-
     ronmental Response, Compensation, and Li-
     ability Act of 1980.
     See 0596
     Streamlining the RI/FS for CERCLA Munici-
     pal Landfill Sites.
     See 1119
     Superfund Desk  Reference  for Municipali-
     ties.
     See 0486
 MUNICIPALITIES
     Conducting  Remedial Investigations/Feasi-
     bility Studies  for CERCLA Municipal  Landfill
     Sites.
     See 1084
     Superfund  Accelerated   Cleanup   Bulletin.
     Volume 1, Number 1. Presumptive Remedies
     for Municipal Landfill Sites.
     See 0117
 MUTAGENICITY TESTS
     Evaluation of Exposure Markers.
    See 1246
     Using the  DNA Alkaline Unwinding  Assay to
     Detect DNA Damage in Laboratory and Envi-
    ronmentally Exposed Cells and Tissues.
    See 1368
 MUTAGENS
    Application of  a  Plant Test System  in the
    Identification of Potential Genetic Hazards at
    Chemical Waste Sites.
    See 1194
NAPHTHALENE
    Health Effects Assessment for Naphthalene.
    See 1044
NATIONAL CONTINGENCY PLAN
    CERCLA   Compliance   with   Other   Laws
    Manual: CERCLA Compliance with State Re-
    quirements.
    See 0405
    National Oil and Hazardous Substances Pol-
    lution Contingency Plan (as Published in the
    Federal Register, March 8,1990).
    See 0145
NATIONAL GOVERNMENT
    Progress  Toward  Implementing  Superfund.
    Fiscal Year 1988.
    See 0299
    Progress  Toward  Implementing  Superfund.
    Fiscal Year 1989.
    See 0300
NATIONAL PRIORITIES LIST
    Accelerated Response at NPL Sites Guid-
    ance (Superfund Management Review: Rec-
    ommendation No. 22).
    See 0082
    Authorization for Regional Administrators to
    Approve Consistency  Exemptions at NPL
    Sites.
    See 0998
    Closing the NPL Book under the Original
    HRS.
    See 0337
    Discussions with the Public Concerning NPL
    Listings.
    See 0339
    FACT  BOOK:  National Priorities  List under
    the Original Hazard Ranking System, 1981-
    1991.
    See 0340
    Guidance on Setting Priorities for NPL Can-
    didate  Sites.
    See 0344
    Mining Sites on the National  Priorities List:
    NPL Site Summary Reports. Volume 1 (Alu-
    minum  Company of  America  (Vancouver
    Smelter) to Cleveland Mill).
    See 0350
    Mining Sites on the National  Priorities List
    NPL  Site  Summary  Reports.  Volume  2
    (Commencement Bay Nearshore/Tideflats to
    Kerr McGee) (Kress Creek,  Reed-Keppler
    Park, Residential Areas, Sewage Treatment
    Plant).
   See 0351
   Mining  Sites on the National  Priorities List:
   NPL Site Summary Reports. Volume 3 (Kerr-
   McGee Chemical Corp. (Soda Springs. Plant)
   to Ormet Corp).
   See 0352
   Mining  Sites on the National Priorities List:
   NPL Site   Summary Reports.  Volume  4
   (Oronogo-Duenweg  Mining  Belt   to  Tar
   Creek).
   See 0353
   Mining  Sites on the National Priorities List:
   NPL Site Summary Reports. Volume 5 (Tele-
   dyne Wah Chang to Wayne Interim  Storage
   Facility/W.R. Grace).
   See 0354
   National Priorities List Sites: Alabama.
   See 0149
   National Priorities List Sites: Alabama, 1992.
   See 0150
   National Priorities List Sites: Alaska.
   See 0152
   National Priorities List Sites: Alaska, 1992.
   See 0153
   National  Priorities   List  Sites: American
   Samoa, Guam, and the Trust Territories.
   See 0154
   National Priorities  List Sites:  Arizona and
   Nevada.
   See 0157
   National Priorities  List Sites:  Arizona and
   Nevada, 1992.
   See 0158
   National Priorities List Sites: Arkansas.
   See 0160
  National Priorities List Sites: Arkansas, 1992.
  See 0161
  National Priorities  List Sites:  California and
  Hawaii.
  See 0163
  National Priorities  List Sites:  California and
  Hawaii, 1992.
  See 0164
  National Priorities List Sites: Colorado.
  See 0166
  National Priorities List Sites: Colorado, 1992.
  See 0167
  National Priorities List Sites: Connecticut.
  See 0169
  National Priorities  List  Sites: Connecticut,
  1992.
  See 0170
  National Priorities List Sites: Delaware.
  See 0172
  National Priorities List Sites: Delaware, 1992.
  See 0173
  National Priorities List Sites: Florida.
  See 0175
  National Priorities List Sites:  Florida,  1992.
  See 0176
  National Priorities List Sites: Georgia.
  See 0178
  National Priorities List Sites: Georgia,  1992.
  See 0179
  National Priorities List Sites: Idaho.
  See 0182
  National Priorities List Sites: Idaho, 1992.
  See 0183
  National Priorities List Sites: Illinois.
 See 0185
  National  Priorities List Sites:  Illinois,  1992.
 See 0186
 National Priorities List Sites: Indiana.
 See 0188
 National  Priorities List Sites: Indiana,  1992.
 See 0189
 National Priorities List Sites: Iowa.
 See 0191
 National Priorities List Sites: Iowa, 1992.
 See 0192
 National Priorities List Sites: Kansas. '
 See 0194
 National Priorities List Sites: Kansas, 1992.
 See 0195
 National Priorities List Sites: Kentucky.
 See 0197
 National Priorities List Sites: Kentucky, 1992.
 See 0198
 National Priorities List Sites: Louisiana.
 See 0200
 National Priorities List Sites: Louisiana, 1992.
 See 0201
 National Priorities List Sites: Maine.
 See 0203
 National Priorities List Sites: Maine,  1992.
 See 0204
 National Priorities List Sites: Maryland.
 See 0206
 National Priorities List  Sites: Maryland, 1992.
 See 0207
 National Priorities List Sites: Massachusetts.
 See 0209
 National Priorities List Sites: Massachusetts,
 1992.
 See 0210
 National Priorities List Sites: Michigan.
 See 0212
 National Priorities List Sites: Michigan, 1992.
 See 0213
 National Priorities List Sites: Minnesota.
See 0215
National  Priorities  List Sites:  Minnesota,
 1992.
See 0216
                                                                                                                                SU-49

-------
NATIONAL PRIORITY LIST
       SUBJECT INDEX
   • National Priorities List Sites: Mississippi.
    See 0218
    National  Priorities  Ust  Sites:  Mississippi,
    1992.
    Sea 0219
    National Priorities Ust Sites: Missouri.
    See 0221
    National Priorities Ust Sites: Missouri, 1992.
    See 0222
    National Priorities Ust Sites: Montana.
    Soft 0224
    National Priorities Ust Sites: Montana, 1992.
    S090225
   1 National Priorities Ust Sites: Nebraska.
    See 0227
    National  Priorities  Ust  Sites:  Nebraska,
    1992.
    Sea 0228
    National  Priorities  Ust Sites:  New Hamp-
   ; shire.      ...............
    Sea 0230
   •••• National  Priorities  Ust Sites:  New Hamp-
   i»" shire, 1992.
    Sea 0231
    National Priorities Ust Sites: New Jersey.
    Sea 0233
    National  Priorities  Ust Sites:  New Jersey,
    1992.
    Se* 0234
   I;: National  Priorities  Ust Sites: New Mexico.
    See 0236
    National  Priorities  Ust Sites: New Mexico,
   ...... 1992.
   '-'See 0237,
   1! ,' National Priorities'Ust Sites: New York.
   '. See 0239 ...................
    National Priorities  Ust Sites:  New York,
    1992.
    See 0240
    National Priorities  Ust  Sites: North  and
    South Dakota, 1992.
    See 0242
   ' National Priorities" List" Sites: North Carolina.
    See 0244
    National Priorities Ust Sites: North Carolina,
    1992.
    See 0245
    National Priorities Ust Sites: North Dakota
    and South  Dakota.
    See 0246
    National Priorities Ust Sites: Ohio.
    See 0248
    National Priorities Ust Sites: Ohio,  1992.
    See 0249
   ;;; National Priorities Ust Sites: Oklahoma.
    See 0251
     National  Priorities  Ust  Sites:  Oklahoma,
            ............
     Sea 0252
     National Priorities Ust Sites: Oregon.
     See 0254
     National Priorities Ust Sites: Oregon, 1992.
     See 0255
     National Priorities Ust  Sites: Pennsylvania.
     Sea 0257
     National Priorities Ust  Sites: Pennsylvania,
     1992.
     Sea 0258
     National Priorities Ust Sites: Puerto Rico.
     See 0260
     National "Priorities Ust Sites: Puerto Rico and
     Virgin Islands, 1992.
     See 0261
     National Priorities Ust  Sites: Rhode Island.
     Sea 0263
     National Priorities List  Sites: Rhode Island,
     1992.
     See 0264
     National Priorities Ust Sites Set (1 991 ).
     See 0265
National Priorities List Sites: South Carolina.
See 0267
National Priorities List Sites: South Carolina,
1992.
See 0268
National Priorities Ust Sites: Tennessee.
See 0270
National  Priorities  List  Sites: Tennessee,
1992.
See 0271
National Priorities List Sites: Texas.
See 0273
National Priorities  List  Sites:  Texas,  1992.
See 0274
National  Priorities  Ust  Sites: The  United
States Territories, 1992.
See 0275
National Priorities Ust Sites: Utah.
See 0277
National Priorities Ust Sites: Utah, 1992.
See 0278
National Priorities Ust Sites: Vermont.
See 0280
National Priorities Ust Sites: Vermont, 1992.
See 0281
National Priorities Ust Sites: Virginia.
See 0283
National Priorities  List Sites: Virginia, 1992.
See 0284
National Priorities Ust Sites: Washington.
See 0286
National  Priorities  List  Sites: Washington,
1992.
See 0287
National  Priorities  List  Sites:  West Virginia.
See 0289
National  Priorities  List  Sites:  West Virginia,
1992.
See 0290
National Priorities List Sites: Wisconsin.
See 0292
National  Priorities List  Sites:  Wisconsin,
 1992.
See 0293
 National Priorities List Sites: Wyoming.
See 0295
 National Priorities List Sites: Wyoming, 1992.
 See 0296
 NPL  Characterization  Project: National Re-
 sults.
 See 0355
 NPL Characterization Project: Region 1 Re-
 sults.
 See 0356
 NPL Characterization Project: Region 3 Re-
 sults.
 See 0357
 NPL Characterization  Project: Region 4 Re-
 sults.
 See 0358
 NPL Characterization  Project: Region 5 Re-
 sults.
 See 0359
 NPL Characterization Project: Region 6 Re-
 sults.
 See 0360
 NPL Characterization Project: Region 7 Re-
 sults.
 See 0361
 NPL Characterization Project: Region 8 Re-
 sults.
 See 0362
 NPL Characterization Project: Region 9 Re-
 sults.
 See 0363
 NPL Characterization Project: Region 10 Re-
 sults.
 See 0364
 Regional Quality  Control Guidance for NPL
 Candidate Sites.
 See 0376
    Superfund: Focusing on the Nation at Large.
    A Decade of Progress at National Priorities
    List Sites.
    See 0322
    Superfund: Focusing on the Nation at Large.
    1991 Update.
    See 0323
NATIONAL PRIORITY LIST
    NPL  Construction Completion Definition at
    Bioremediation and Soil  Vapor Extraction
    Sites.
    See 0365
NATURAL RESOURCE TRUSTEES
    ECO Update.  Volume  1,  Number  3.  The
    Role of Natural  Resource Trustees in the
    Superfund Process.
    See 1021

NEBRASKA
    National Priorities List Sites: Nebraska.
    See 0226
    National Priorities List Sites: Nebraska.
    See 0227
    National   Priorities  List  Sites:  Nebraska,
    1992.
    See 0228
    Site  Enforcement Tracking System  (SETS):
    PRP Listing by Site for Nebraska.
    See 0696
    Site  Enforcement Tracking System  (SETS):
    PRP Listing by Site for Nebraska.
    See 0697
    Site  Enforcement Tracking System  (SETS):
    PRP Listing by Site for Nebraska.
    See 0698
 NEVADA
    National  Priorities List  Sites: Arizona and
    Nevada.
    See 0156
    National  Priorities List  Sites: Arizona and
    Nevada.
    See 0157
    National  Priorities List  Sites: Arizona and
    Nevada,  1992.
    See 0158
    Site Enforcement Tracking System  (SETS):
    PRP Listing by Site for Nevada.
    See 0699
    Site Enforcement  Tracking System  (SETS):
    PRP Listing by Site for Nevada.
    See 0700
    Site Enforcement  Tracking System  (SETS):
     PRP Listing by Site for Nevada.
     See 0701
 NEW BEDFORD HARBOR
     Applications Analysis Report: SITE  Program,
     CF  Systems  Organics Extraction   System,
     New Bedford, Massachusetts.
     See 1196
     Framework  for  Real-Time  Decision-Making:
     New Bedford Harbor Pilot Dredging Study.
     See 1587
     Development  and   Use  of  Site-Specific
     Chemical and Biological Criteria for Assess-
     ing  New  Bedford  Harbor  Pilot  Dredging
     Project.
     See 1583
 NEW CASTLE COUNTY (DELAWARE)
     Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Clean-
     up Efforts Nationwide, Spring 1993 (Harvey
     and  Knott Drum  Site,  New Castle County,
     Delaware).
     See 0956
  SU-50

-------
                                                          SUBJECT INDEX
                                                                                                        NOTIFICATION PROCEDURES
  NEW CASTLE (DELAWARE)
      Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Clean-
      up Efforts Nationwide, Summer 1993 (Army
      Creek Landfill Site Profile, New Castle  Dela-
      ware).
      See 0962
  NEW HAMPSHIRE
      National Priorities  List Sites: New Hamp-
      shire.
      See 0229
      National Priorities  List Sites: New Hamp-
      shire.                                K
      See 0230
      National Priorities  List Sites: New Hamp-
      shire, 1992.
      See 0231
      Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)-
      PRP Listing by Site for New Hampshire.
      See 0702
      Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)-
      PRP Listing by Site for New Hampshire.
      See 0703
      Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)-
      PRP Listing by Site for New Hampshire.
     See 0704
 NEW JERSEY
     National Priorities List Sites: New Jersey
     See 0232                         y
     National Priorities List Sites: New Jersey
     See 0233
     National Priorities List Sites: New Jersey
     1992.
     See 0234
     Site Enforcement Tracking  System  (SETS)-
     PRP Listing by Site for New Jersey
     See 0705
     Site Enforcement Tracking System  (SETS)-
     PRP Listing by Site for New Jersey
     See 0706
     Site Enforcement Tracking System  (SETS)-
     PRP Listing by Site for New Jersey.
     See 0707                    y
 NEW MEXICO
     National  Priorities List Sites: New Mexico.
     See 0235
     National  Priorities List Sites: New Mexico
     See 0236
     National  Priorities List Sites: New Mexico
     1992.
     See 0237
    Site  Enforcement  Tracking  System (SETS)-
    PRP Listing by Site for New Mexico.
    See 0708
    Site  Enforcement  Tracking  System  (SETS)-
    PRP Listing by Site for New Mexico.
    See 0709
    Site  Enforcement Tracking System  (SETS)-
    PRP Listing by Site for New Mexico
    See 0710
NEW YORK
    National Priorities List Sites: New York
    See 0238
    National Priorities List Sites: New York.
    See 0239
    National   Priorities  List  Sites:  New York
    1992.
    See 0240
    Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)-
    PRP Listing by Site  for New York.
    See 0711
    Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)-
    PRP Listing by Site  for New York.
    See 0712
    Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)-
    PRP Listing by Site for New York
    See 0713
   Superfund at Work:  Hazardous Waste Clean-
   up Efforts  Nationwide, Spring  1993 (Radium
   Chemical Site Profile, Queens,  New  York)
   See 0959
   NEWS MEDIA
      Tech Trends Number 3, December 1990
      See 1325
      Tech Trends Number 4, March 1991.
      See 1326
      Tech Trends Number 9, June 1992
      See 1329
  NEWSLETTERS
      Forum Focus, August 1993.
      See 0136
  NICKEL
      Acid Volatile  Sulfide Predicts the Acute Tox-
      icity of Cadmium and Nickel in Sediments
      See 1572
  NITRO (WEST VIRGINIA)
      Superfund at  Work: Hazardous Waste Clean-
      up Efforts Nationwide, Summer 1993 (Fike/
      Artel Chemical Site Profile, Nitro, West Vir-
      ginia).
      See 0967
  NONBINDING PRELIMINARY ALLOCATIONS
  OF RESPONSIBILITY
      Interim Guidelines for Preparing Nonbinding
      Preliminary Allocations of Responsibility.
      See 0564
  NORTH CAROLINA
      National Priorities List Sites: North Carolina
      See 0243
      National Priorities List Sites: North Carolina
      See 0244
      National Priorities List Sites: North Carolina,
      1992.
      See 0245
     Site  Enforcement Tracking  System (SETS)-
     PRP Listing by Site for North Carolina.
     See 0714
     Site  Enforcement Tracking  System (SETS):
     PRP Listing by Site for North Carolina.
     See 0715
     Site  Enforcement Tracking  System (SETS):
     PRP Listing by Site for North Carolina.
     See 0716
 NORTH DAKOTA
     National  Priorities  List  Sites:   North  and
     South Dakota.
     See 0241
     National  Priorities  List  Sites:  North  and
    South Dakota,  1992.
    See 0242
    National Priorities List Sites: North Dakota
    and South Dakota.
    See 0246
    Site Enforcement  Tracking System (SETS)-
    PRP Listing by  Site for North Dakota.
    See 0717
    Site Enforcement  Tracking System (SETS)-
    PRP Listing by  Site for North Dakota.
    See 0718
    Site Enforcement  Tracking System (SETS)-
    PRP Listing by Site for North  Dakota.
    See 0719
NORTHERN REGION (IDAHO)
    Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Clean-
    up Efforts Nationwide, Fall  1993 (Bunker Hill
    Site Profile, Silver Valley,  Northern Idaho)
    See 0951
NOTIFICATION PROCEDURES
    Final Guidance  on Preparing Waste-In Lists
    and Volumetric  Rankings for Release to Po-
    tentially Responsible Parties (PRPs)  under
    CERCLA ('Waste-In' Guidance).
    See 0542
    Model Informational Notice  Letter to  Local
    Governments.
    See 0575
    Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)-
    Frequency by Party Name Report.
    See 0609
   Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)-
   PRP Listing by Site for Alabama.
   See 0623
   Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
   PRP Listing by  Site for  American Samoa.
   See 0626
   Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
   PRP Listing by Site for Arizona.
   See 0629
   Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
   PRP Listing by Site for Arkansas.
   See 0632
   Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
   PRP Listing by Site for California.
   See 0635
   Site Enforcement Tracking System  (SETS):
   PRP Listing by Site for Colorado.
   See 0638
   Site Enforcement Tracking System  (SETS):
   PRP Listing by Site for Connecticut.
   See 0641
   Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
   PRP Listing by Site for Delaware.
  See 0644
  Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
  PRP Listing by Site for Florida.
  See 0647
  Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
  PRP Listing by Site for Georgia.
  See 0650
  Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
  PRP Listing by Site for Idaho.
  See 0653
  Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
  PRP Listing by Site for Illinois.
  See 0656
  Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
  PRP Listing by Site for Indiana.
  See 0659
  Site Enforcement Tracking System  (SETS):
  PRP Listing by Site for Iowa.
  See 0662
  Site Enforcement  Tracking System  (SETS):
  PRP Listing by Site for Kansas.
  See 0665
  Site Enforcement  Tracking System (SETS):
  PRP Listing by Site for Kentucky.
  See 0668
  Site Enforcement  Tracking  System (SETS)-
 PRP Listing by Site for Louisiana.
 See 0671
 Site  Enforcement  Tracking  System (SETS)-
 PRP Listing by Site for Maine.
 See 0674
 Site Enforcement Tracking  System (SETS):
 PRP Listing by Site for Maryland.
 See 0677
 Site Enforcement Tracking  System (SETS):
 PRP Listing by Site for Massachusetts.
 See 0680
 Site Enforcement Tracking  System (SETS)-
 PRP Listing by Site for Michigan.
 See 0683
 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
 PRP Listing by Site for Minnesota.
 See 0686
 Site Enforcement  Tracking System  (SETS):
 PRP Listing by Site for Mississippi.
 See 0689
 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
 PRP Listing by Site  for Missouri.
 See 0692
 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)-
 PRP Listing by Site for Montana.
See 0695
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)-
PRP Listing by Site for Nebraska.
See 0698
                                                                                                                            SU-51

-------
OClSS (ORGANIC CONTRACT COMPLIANCE
SCREENING SYSTEM)
          SUBJECT INDEX
    Site Enforcement tracking System (SETS):
    PRP Listing by Site for Nevada.
    Sea 0701
    Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
    PRP Ustlng by Site for New Hampshire.
    Soa 0704
    Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
    PRP Listing by Site for New Jersey.
    Soa 0707
    Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
   , PflP Listing by Site for New Mexico.
    See 0710
    Site Enforcement'Tracking System (SETS):
    PRP Listing fay Site for New York.
    Sea 0713
   [Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
   ! PRP Listing by Site for North Carolina.
    S«e 0716
    SHo Enforcement Tracking System  (SETS):
   in PRP Listing by Site for North Dakota.
    See 0719
    Site Enforcement Tracking System  (SETS):
   - Pftt* Listing  by  Site for Northern Marianas.
    See 0722
    Site Enforcement  tracking System (SETS):
    PRP Listing by Site for Ohio.
    See 0725
   : Site  Enforcement  Tracking  System (SETS):
   = PRP Listing by Site for Oklahoma.
    See 0728
    Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
    PRP Listing by Site for Oregon.
    See 0731
    Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
    PRP Listing by Site for Pennsylvania.
    See 0734
   :;: Site Enforcement Tracking System  (SETS):
   iii PRP Listing by Site for Puerto Rico.
    See 0737
     Site Enforcement Tracking System  (SETS):
   i!	PRP Listing by Site for Rhode Island.
     See 0789
     SHe Enforcement Tracking System  (SETS):
     PRP Listing  by Site for South Carolina.
     See 0792
     Site Enforcement Tracking System  (SETS):
     PRP Listing by Site for South Dakota.
     Soa 0795
     Site Enforcement Tracking System  (SETS):
     PRP Listing by Site for Tennessee.
     See 0790
   	Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
     PRP Listing by  Site for Texas.
   !:::: see 0601
     Site  Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
     PRP Listing by Site for Trust Territories.
     Sea 0804
     Site  Enforcement Tracking  System (SETS):
     PRP Listing by Site for Utah.
     Sea 0807
    /Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
     PRP Listing by Site for Vermont
     See 0810
     Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
      PRP Listing by Site for Virginia.
      Sen 0812                         r_re,x
      Sita Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
      PRP Listing by Site for Washington.
      See 0815
      Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
      PRP Listing by Site for West Virginia.
      See 0818
      SHe Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
      PRP Listing by Site for Wisconsin.
      See 0821
   i  Slta Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
      PRP Listing by Site for Wyoming.
      See 0824
      Site Enforcement tracking  System (SETS):
   '::  PPP National Dsting Alphabetically by Party
      Name.
      See 0828
    Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
    PRP National Listing by Site.
    See 0834
OCCSS (ORGANIC CONTRACT COMPLIANCE
SCREENING SYSTEM)
    Organic  Contract  Compliance  Screening
    System  (OCCSS) Software (OLM01.8 Ver-
    sion 4) (for Microcomputers).
    See 0051
OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURE
    Effect of  OSHA's  Bloodborne  Pathogens
    Standard on Hazardous Waste Cleanup Ac-
    tivities.
    See 1026
    Personal Air  Sampling and  Air Monitoring
    Requirements under 29 CFR 1910.120.
    See 0922
OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH
    Establishing  Work  Zones at Uncontrolled
    Hazardous Waste Sites.
    See 0908
    Field  Applications  of Robotic Systems  in
    Hazardous  Environments,  p1-29 1993. See
    also PB86-176344 and PB92-166743.
    See 1251
    Reid Standard Operating Procedures for Air
    Surveillance F.S.O.P. No. 8.
    See 0910
    Field Standard Operating Procedures for Es-
    tablishing Work Zones (F.S.O.P. 6).
    See 0911
    Field  Standard  Operating Procedures for
    Preparation of a Site Safety Plan  F.S.O.P.
    No. 9.
    See 0912
    Field Standard Operating Procedures for the
    Decontamination of  Response  Personnel
    F.S.O.P. No. 7.
    See 0913
    Guidelines for the Cleanup of Clandestine
     Drug Laboratories.
     See 1007
     Hazardous Waste Operations and Emergen-
     cy  Response:   Uncontrolled   Hazardous
     Waste  Sites and RCRA Corrective Actions.
     See 0425
     Hazardous Waste Operations and Emergen-
     cy Response: RCRA TSD and  Emergency
     Response Without  Regard to Location.
     See 0914
     Health and Safety Audit Guidelines: SARA
     Title I, Section 126.
     See 0918
     Health and Safety  Plan (HASP) User's Guide
     (Version 3.0/4.0).
     See 0917
     Health Effects Assessment for Benzene.
     See 1035
     Health Effects Assessment for Cadmium.
     See 1036
     Health Effects Assessment for Carbon Tet-
     rachloride.
     See 1037
      Health Effects Assessment for Chlordane.
     See 1038
      Health Effects  Assessment for Chloroben-
      zene.
      See 1039
      Health Effects  Assessment for Chloroform.
      See 1040
      Health Effects Assessment for DDT.
      See 1041
      Health Effects Assessment  for  Methyl Ethyl
      Ketone.
      See 1042
      Health Effects Assessment for  Methylene
      Chloride.
      See 1043
       Health Effects Assessment for Naphthalene.
       See 1044
   Health Effects Assessment for Phenol.
   See 1045
   Health Effects Assessment for Styrene.
   See 1046
   Health Effects  Assessment for  Tetrachlor-
   oethylene.
   See 1047
   Health Effects Assessment for Trichloroethy-
   lene.
   See 1048
   Health Effects Assessment for Xylenes.
   See 1049
   Health Effects Assessment for 2,4,5-Trichlor-
   ophenoxy Acetic Acid (2,4,5-T).
   See 1050
   OSWER Integrated Health and Safety Policy.
   See 0920
   OSWER Integrated Health and Safety Stand-
   ard Operating Practices.
   See 0921
   Priority for Health and Safety Requirements,
   Especially  Medical  Surveillance  Require-
   ments, for EPA Employees Who  Support
   OSWER Programs.
   See 0923
   Estimation of the Cost of  Using  Chemical
   Protective Clothing.
   See 1244
   Personnel  Protection  through  Reconnais-
   sance  Robotics  at  Superfund  Remedial
   Sites.
   See 1286
   Updated Health Effects Assessment for Ace-
   tone.
   See 1080
OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH
ADMINISTRATION
   Standard Operating Safety Guides.
   See 0924
OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND PROTECTION
    Limited-Use Chemical Protective Clothing for
    EPA Superfund Activities.
    See 1058
OFFICE OF EMERGENCY AND REMEDIAL
RESPONSE
    CERCLA Compliance with Other Environ-
    mental Statutes.
    See 0404
OFFICE OF SOLID WASTE AND EMERGENCY
RESPONSE
    Accelerated Response at NPL Sites Guid-
    ance (Superfund Management Review: Rec-
    ommendation  No. 22).
    See 0082
    Accelerating  Potentially Responsible  Party
    Remedial Design  Starts:  Implementing the
    30-Day Study.
    See 0509
    Administrative Order on Consent for Reme-
    dial Investigations/Feasibility Study.
    See 0510
    Administrative Penalty Procedures.
    See 0511
     Advancing the Use of Treatment Technol-
     ogies for Superfund Remedies.
     See 1191
     Amendment to Historical  Definitions of NPL
     Deletion Start and Completion  Dates.
     See 0335
     Analysis  of Treatability Data for Soil and
     Debris:  Evaluation of Land Ban  Impact on
     Use  of  Superfund Treatment  Technologies.
     See 1488
   SU-52

-------
  Applicability of Land Disposal Restrictions to
  RCRA and  CERCLA Ground Water Treat-
  ment  Reinjection  Superfund  Management
  Review: Recommendation No. 26.
  See 1430
  Approval of Long Term Contracting Strategy
  for  Superfund  (Superfund   Management
  Review: Recommendation E.2).
  See 0018
  ARAR's Q's and A's. Compliance  with the
  Toxicity Characteristics Rule. Part 1.
  See 0396
  ARARs Fact Sheet:  Compliance  with  the
  Clean Air Act and Associated Air Quality Re-
  quirements.
  See 0397
  ARARs Q's and A's.
  See 0398
  ARARS Q's  and A's: Compliance with Fed-
  eral Water Quality Criteria.
  See 0399
  ARARs Q's and A's: General  Policy, RCRA
  CWA,  SDWA,  Post-ROD Information, and
  Contingent Waivers.
  See 0401
  ARARs Q's  and A's: State  Ground-Water
  Antidegradation Issues.
  See 0402
  ARARs Q's  and A's: The Fund-Balancing
  Waiver.
  See 0403
  Arbitration  Procedures for Small Superfund
  Cost Recovery Claims.
 See 0512
 ARCS  Construction Contract  Modification
  Procedures.
 See 0020
 ARCS Work Assignment Management: Field
 Guide.
 See 0021
 Assurance  of Hazardous  Waste  Capacity
 Guidance  to  State  Officials. Assistance in
 Fulfilling the  Requirements  of  CERCLA
 104(c)(9).
 See 0129
 Audits and the Superfund Program Manager
 See 0086
 Authority to Use CERCLA  to Provide En-
 forcement Funding Assistance to States.
 See 0450
 CERCLA Community Relations  Mailing Lists.
 See 0451
 CERCLA  Compliance  with  Other  Laws
 Manual: CERCLA Compliance with State Re-
 quirements.
 See 0405
 CERCLA  Compliance with Other  Laws
 Manual: CERCLA Compliance with the CWA
 and SDWA.
 See 0406
 CERCLA  Compliance with  Other  Laws
 Manual: Guide to Manual.
 See 0407
 CERCLA  Compliance  with  Other  Laws
 Manual: Overview of ARARs -  Focus on
 ARAR Waivers.
 See 0408
 CERCLA  Compliance  with  Other  Laws
 Manual: RCRA  ARARS-Focus on  Closure
 Requirements.
 See 0410                   :
 CERCLA Compliance  with  Other  Laws
 Manual: Summary and Part 2.  CAA,  TSCA,
 and Other Statutes.
See 0411
CERCLA Compliance with the RCRA Toxici-
ty Characteristics (TC) Rule: Part 2.
See 0412
                                                     SUBJECT INDEX
   CERCLA Implementation of Inspector Train-
   ing Requirements for OSCs/RPMs at the In-
   termediate Level in STEP and First-Line Su-
   pervisors.
   See 0517
   CERCLA Off-Site Policy - Eligibility of Facili-
   ties in Assessment Monitoring.
   See 0414
   CERCLA Off-Site Policy: Providing Notice to
   Facilities.
   See 0415
   CERCLA Removal Actions at Methane Re-
   lease Sites.
   See 0416
   CERCLA  Site  Discharges  to  POTWS
   CERCLA Site Sampling  Program: Detailed
   Data Report.
   See 1575
   CERCLA Site Discharges to POTWS Treat-
   ability Manual.
   See 1577
  CERCLA Waste Capacity Assurance.
  See 0131
  CERCLIS  Data  Handling Support  Policy
  Statement.
  See 0013
  CERCLIS Listing.
  See 0014
  Chemical Dehalogenation Treatability Stud-
  ies under CERCLA: An Overview.
  See 1209
  Citizen's Guide to Air Sparging.
  See 0452
  Citizen's Guide to Bioventing.
  See 0453
  Citizen's Guide to In situ Soil Flushing.
  See 0456
  Citizen's Guide  to Innovative  Treatment
  Technologies  for   Contaminated   Soils,
  Sludges, Sediments and Debris.
  See 0457
  Citizen's Guide to Using Indigenous and Ex-
  ogenous Microorganisms in Bioremediation.
.  See 0461
  Citizens' Guidance Manual for the Technical
  Assistance Grant  Program.
  See 0462
  Clarification of Delegation to Approve Con-
  sistency Exemptions at NPL Sites.
  See 0336
  Closing  the  NPL Book  under the Original
  HRS.
  See 0337
  Community  Relations during  Enforcement
  Activities and Development of the Adminis-
  trative Record.
  See 0466
 Community  Relations: Use of Senior Envi-
  ronmental Employees in Superfund (Super-
 fund Management Review: Recommendation
 43.K.L).
 See 0088
 Comparative Analysis of  Remedies Selected
 in the Superfund Program during FY 87, FY
 88 and FY 89.
 See 0519
 Compendium  of ERT Air  Sampling Proce-
 dures.
 See 0901
 Compendium of ERT Field Analytical Proce-
 dures.
 See 0902
 Congressional Limits for FY 92 Alternative
 Remedial Contracting Strategy (ARCS) Pro-
 gram Management Costs.
 See 0022
 Consent   Orders  and the Reimbursement
 Provision  Under Section  106(b) of CERCLA
 See 0520
             OFFICE OF SOLID WASTE
         AND EMERGENCY RESPONSE

  Consideration  of RCRA Requirements  in
  Performing CERCLA Responses  at  Mining
  Waste Sites.
  See 0420
  Considerations  in Ground Water Remedi-
  ation at Superfund Sites.
  See 1436
  Consultation  on  Records   of  Decision
  (RODS) for Containment-Only Remedies.
  See 0521
  Control of Air Emissions  from Superfund Air
  Strippers at Superfund Groundwater Sites.
  See 1399
  Coordination of EPA and State Actions in
  Cost Recovery.
  See 0522
  Cost Recovery  Actions/Statute of  Limita-
  tions.
  See 0523
  Cost Recovery Actions under CERCLA.
  See 0524
  Cost Recovery Referrals.
  See 0525
  Counting State-Lead Enforcement NPL Sites
  Toward the CERCLA Section  116(e)  Reme-
  dial Action Start Mandate.
 See 0468
 Criminal  Investigations and the Superfund
 Program.
 See 0469
 Decentralization of Superfund Bottle Reposi-
 tory Functions.
 See 0985
 Discharge  of  Wastewater  from   CERCLA
 Sites into POTWS.
 See 0421
 Endangerment Assessment Guidance.
 See 0527
 Endangerment Assessment Guidance.
 See 0528
 Endangerment Assessment Handbook.
 See 0529
 Entry and Continued Access under CERCLA.
 See 0534
 EPA Interim Guidance on  Indemnification of
 Superfund  Response Action  Contractors
 Under Section 119 of SARA.
 See 0536
 EPA Oversight of Remedial Designs and Re-
 medial Actions Performed by PRPs.
 See 1124
 EPA/U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Payment
 Process,  Direct  Cite/Revised  Reimburse-
 ment Methods.
 See 1125
 EPA/USAGE Payment Process: Direct Cite/
 Revised Reimbursement Methods.
 See 1126
 Establishing  Work  Zones at  Uncontrolled
 Hazardous Waste Sites.
 See 0908
 Evaluation of, and Additional  Guidance on,
 Issuance of Unilateral  Administrative Orders
 (UAOs) for RD/RA.
 See 0538
 Exemptions from the Statutory Limits on Re-
 moval Actions.
 See 1002
 Exercising Flexibility through  the Superfund
 Accelerated Cleanup Model (SACM).
 See 0091
 Expanded Civil Judicial Referral Procedures.
See 0539
Expansion of Direct Referral of Cases to the
Department of Justice.
See 0540
 Expediting Remedial Construction.
See 1127
                                                                                                                        SU-53

-------
    OFFICE OF SOLID WASTE
AND EMERGENCY RESPONSE

    fxtending the Tracking of  Analytical Serv-
    ices to Potentially Responsible Party-Lead
    Soporfund Sites (Supplemental Guidance on
    OSWER Directive 9240.0-2A).
    See 0906
    Feasibility Study: Detailed Analysis of Reme-
    dial Action Alternatives.
    See 1083
    Feasibility Study:  Development and Screen-
    Ing o( Remedial Action Alternatives.
    Saa 1089
    Field Standard Operating Procedures for Air
    Surveillance F.S.O.P. No. 8.
    See 0910
    Field Standard Operating Procedures for Es-
    tablishing Work Zones (F.S.O.P. 6).
    See 0911
    FteW  Standard  Operating  Procedures for
    Preparation of a Site Safety Plan  F.S.O.P.
    No. 9.
    SC90912
    Ftold Standard Operating Procedures for the
    Decontamination  of  Response  Personnel
    F.S.O.P. No. 7.
    See 0913
   I Final EPA Policy on the Inclusion of Environ-
    montal Auditing  Provisions in Enforcement
    Settlements.
    Sea 0541
     Ftnal  Guidance on  Administrative  Records
    for Selecting CERCLA Response Actions.
    Sa«0473
   I  Final  Guidance  on  Implementation of the
   '  ^Consistency' Exemption  to  the Statutory
     Limits on Removal Actions.
     S«*1004
   i  Final Guidance on Preparing Waste-In Lists
   |  and Volumetric Rankings for  Release to Po-
   !  Jentfafiy  Responsible Parties  (PRPs) under
     CERCLA fWasta-In1 Guidance).
     Sao 0542
   '  Final Policy on Setting Ri/FS Priorities.
   !  Sea 1090
   ;  First iiS Da Minimis Settlements: Statistics
   :'  from EPA's De Minimis Database.
     Sea 0543
     Funding  of  State Enforcement Related Ac-
   :  ttritfes.
     Sea 0474
   I  Furthoring the Use  of Innovative Treatment
   |  Technologies In OSWER Programs.
     Sea 1255
   :  FY 1992 Themes for Regional Coordination
   •  to Support Continuous improvements of Su-
     porlund's Remedial  Program.
     Sea 1091
     Getting Ready: Scoping the Rl/FS.
     Sea 1092
   ;  Guidance for Coordinating  ATSDR Health
     Assessment Activities with  the Superfund
     Remedial Process.
     See 1029
   ;;,"' Guidance for Data Useability in Risk Assess-
   "  nrwnt
     See 1031
     Guidance for Environmental  Priorities Initia-
   •  live (EPI) Facilities  in the Superfund Pre-Re-
   •  modial Program.
     Soa0341
     Guidance  for  Organizing  ARCS  Contract
   ;:  Fttes.
     See 002S
     Guidance of the Use of Stipulated Penalties
     In Hazardous Waste Consent Decrees.
     SC90544
     Guidance  on  Applicability  of  EPA Order
     3500.1 to CERCLA Staff.
     S»a0545	
   !i!  Guidance on CERCLA Section 106 Judicial
     Actions.
   ';•„ Sea 0546     ,"     '_	


  SU-54
       SUBJECT INDEX
Guidance on CERCLA 106(a) Unilateral Ad-
ministrative Orders for  Remedial  Designs
and Remedial Actions.
See 0548
Guidance on Documenting Decisions Not to
Take Cost Recovery Actions.
See 0549
Guidance  on Drafting Consent Decrees in
Hazardous Waste Cases.
See 0550
Guidance on Federal Superfund Liens.
See 0551
Guidance  on Implementation of the Super-
fund Accelerated  Cleanup  Model  (SACM)
under CERCLA and the NCP.
See 0094
Guidance on Landowner Liability under Sec-
tion 107{a)(1) of CERCLA, De Minimis  Set-
tlements  under  Section  122(g)(1)(B)  of
CERCLA,  and Settlements with Prospective
Purchasers of Contaminated Property.
See 0552
Guidance  on Oversight of Potentially Re-
sponsible  Party  Remedial  Investigations and
Feasibility Studies. Volume 1.
See 1094
Guidance  on Oversight of Potentially Re-
sponsible  Party  Remedial  Investigations and
Feasibility Studies. Volume 2. Appendices.
See 1095
Guidance  on Oversight of PRP Performed
RD/RA.
See 1130
Guidance on Premium Payments in CERCLA
Settlements.
See 0553
Guidance on Preparing Waste-in Lists and
Volumetric Rankings for Release to Poten-
tially   Responsible  Parties  (PRPs)  under
CERCLA.
See 0554
 Guidance  on  Procedures  for  Submitting
 CERCLA Section  106(b) Reimbursement Pe-
 titions and on  EPA Review of Those Peti-
 tions.
 See 0555
 Guidance on Program  Management Activi-
 ties under ARCS.
 See 0026
 Guidance Regarding CERCLA Enforcement
 against Bankrupt Parties.
 See 0556
 Guide  for  Conducting Treatability Studies
 under  CERCLA:  Aerobic  Biodegradation
 Remedy Screening.
 See 1156
 Guide  for  Conducting Treatability Studies
 under  CERCLA:  Aerobic  Biodegradation
 Remedy  Screening. Quick Reference Fact
 Sheet.
 See 1158
 Guide for  Conducting Treatability  Studies
 under CERCLA: Biodegradation Remedy Se-
 lection. Quick Reference  Fact Sheet.
 See 1160
 Guide for Conducting Treatability  Studies
 under CERCLA: Chemical Dehalogenation.
 See 1161
 Guide for Conducting Treatability  Studies
 under CERCLA: Soil Vapor Extraction. Quick
 Reference Fact Sheet.
 See 1164
 Guide for Conducting  Treatability Studies
 under CERCLA:  Soil Washing: Quick  Refer-
  ence Fact Sheet.
  See 1166
  Guide for Conducting  Treatability Studies
  under CERCLA  Solvent Extraction.  Interim
  Guidance,
  See 1167
Guide for Conducting Treatability Studies
under CERCLA:  Solvent  Extraction  Quick
Reference Fact Sheet.
See 1168
Guide for Conducting Treatability Studies
under CERCLA: Thermal  Desorption  Quick
Reference Fact Sheet.
See 1169
Guide on  Remedial Actions at Superfund
Sites with PCB Contamination.
See 1262
Guide on Remedial Actions for Contaminat-
ed Ground Water.
See 1461
Guide to  Addressing  Pre-ROD and Post-
ROD Changes.
See 1096
Guide to Delisting of RCRA Wastes for Su-
perfund  Remedial Responses.
See 0422
Guide to Developing Action Memorandums.
See 1097
Guide to Developing  Superfund No Action,
Interim  Action,  and  Contingency  Remedy
RODS.
See 1098
Guide  to  Developing  Superfund Proposed
Plans.
See 1099
Guide to  Management of Investigation-De-
rived Wastes.
See 0345
Guide jo Pump and Treat Groundwater Re-
mediation Technology.
See 1462
Guide to Removal Enforcement.
See 1006
Guide to Selecting Superfund Remedial Ac-
tions.
See 1100
 Guidelines for Effective Management of the
 Contract Laboratory Program.
 See 0027
 Hazard Ranking System  Guidance Manual.
 See 0346
 Hazardous Waste Operations and  Emergen-
 cy  Response:   Uncontrolled   Hazardous
 Waste  Sites and RCRA Corrective Actions.
 See 0425
 Hazardous Waste Operations and Emergen-
 cy Response: RCRA TSD and Emergency
 Response Without Regard to Location.
 See 0914
 Headquarters Support Contract Management
 Procedures.
 See 0029
 Identification of a Senior Superfund Official
 for  Addressing  Special  NPL  Site-Related
 Issues.
 See 0348
 Implementation  of the  Decentralized  Con-
 tractor Performance  Evaluation and Award
 Fee Process for Selected Remedial Program
 Contracts.
 See 0031
 Implementing  the  Deputy  Administrator's
 Risk Characterization Memorandum.
 See 1056
  Initiation of PRP-Financed Remedial Design
 in Advance of Consent Decree Entry (Final).
  See 0557
  Initiatives to Streamline  the Alternative  Re-
  medial Contracting Strategy (ARCS) Con-
  tracts' Award Fee Process.
  See 0033
      I
                                                                                                  :,	i.

-------
  Innovative  Methods to Increase  Public In-
  volvement  in  Superiund  Community  Rela-
  tions (Superfund Management Review Rec-
  ommendation No. 43.A).
  See 0097
  Innovative  Technology: BEST  Solvent Ex-
  traction Process.
  See 1270
  Innovative  Technology:  Glycolate Dehalo-
  genation.
  See 1513
  Innovative Technology: In-situ Vitrification.
  See 1514
  Innovative Technology: Slurry-Phase Biode-
  gradation.
  See 1271
  Innovative Technology: Soil Washing
  See 1515
  Integrated Timeline for Superfund Site Man-
  agement (SMR 5,15).
  See 0098
  Interim Cashout Settlement Procedures.
  See 0558
  Interim CERCLA Settlement Policy
  See 0559
  Interim Final Guidance Package on Funding
  CERCLA State Enforcement  Actions at NPL
  Sites.
  See 0477
  Interim Guidance for  Soil Ingestion Rates.
 See 1057
  Interim Guidance on Establishing Soil Lead
 Cleanup Levels at Superfund Sites. Supple-
 ment to Interim Guidance on Establishing
 Soil  Lead  Cleanup Levels   at Superfund
 Sites.
 See 1516
 Interim Guidance on Potentially Responsible
 Party Participation in Remedial Investigations
 and Feasibility Studies
 See 0561
 Interim Guidance on  Settlements  with  De
 Minimis Waste Contributors  under  Section
 122(g)ofSARA.
 See 0562
 Interim Guidance: Streamlining the CERCLA
 Settlement Decision Process.
 See 0563
 Interim Guidelines for Preparing  Nonbinding
 Preliminary Allocations of Responsibility.
 See 0564
 Interim RCRA/CERCLA Guidance on  Non-
 Contiguous Sites and On-Site Management
 on Waste and Treatment Residue
 See 0427
 Involvement  of  Superfund  Program  Manag-
 ers  in Superfund  Response  Agreement
 Audits.
 See 0099
 Issuance of Administrative Orders for Imme-
 diate Removal Actions.
 See 0567
 Issuance of  Administrative  Orders Under
 Section 3013 of the Resource Conservation
 and Recovery Act.
 See 0568
 Issuance of Final Revised Guidance on the
 Use and Issuance of Administrative Orders
 Under Section  7003 of the Resource Con-
 servation and Recovery Act (RCRA).
 See 0569
 Land  Disposal Restrictions  as Relevant and
 Appropriate Requirements for CERCLA Con-
taminated Soil and Debris.
See 0428
 Liability of Corporate Shareholders and Suc-
cessor Corporations for Abandoned Sites
 Under the  Comprehensive  Environmental
Response, Compensation and Liability Act
See 0570
                                                      SUBJECT INDEX
  Limiting  Lead Transfers to Private  Parties
  during  Discrete  Phases  of the Remedial
  Process.
  See 0571
  Long-Term Contracting Strategy for  Super-
  fund.
  See 0042
  Making Superfund  Documents  Available to
  the Public throughout the Cleanup Process,
  and Discussing Site Findings and Decisions
  as They are Developed (Superfund Manage-
  ment Review: No. 43 G, H, Q, R, T).
  See 0100
  Management    of    Investigation-Derived
  Wastes during Site Inspections.
  See 0349
  Mandatory  Community  Relations Training.
  Superfund Management Review  Implementa-
  tion Product (Recommendation:  No. 43.P(i)).
  See 0103
  Mandatory Training Requirements for OCSs
  and RPMs.
  See 0104
  Methodology  for  Early  be  Minimis Waste
  Contributor Settlements under CERCLA Sec-
  tion 122(g) (1) (A).
  See 0573
  Minimizing Problems Caused by Staff Turn-
  over (Superfund Management Review:  Rec-
 ommendation No. 43, M, N, O)
 See 0105
 Model  Informational Notice Letter to  Local
 Governments.
 See 0575
 Model  Litigation Report for  CERCLA  Sec-
 tions 106 and 107 and RCRA Section  7003.
 See 0576
 Model Performance Standards for Superfund
 Project Officers, Deputy Project Officers, and
 Work Assignment Managers/Delivery Order
 Officers.
 See 0045
 Model Statement  of Work for a Remedial
 Investigation and  Feasibility Study Conduct-
 ed by Potentially Responsible  Parties.
 See 0578
 Model Unilateral Order for Remedial Design
 and Remedial Action.
 See 0580
 Multi-Media  Settlements of  Enforcement
 Claims.
 See 0581
 Multi-Media  Settlements of  Enforcement
 Claims.
 See 0582
 Municipal Settlements.
 See 0583
 Notification of Out-of-State Shipments of Su-
 perfund Site Wastes.
 See 0429
 Notification  Requirements  for  Continuous
 Releases of Hazardous Substances.
 See 1148
 OERR   Organizational  Conflict  of Interest
 Review  and Approval  Program  (Superfund
 Management Review: Recommendation No
 46C).
 See 0046
 Off-Site  Policy: RFA or Equivalent Investiga-
 tion Requirement at RCRA Treatment  and
 Storage Facilities.
 See 0431
 Oil Notifications: Emergency Response Noti-
fication System (ERNS) Fact Sheet.
See 0930
OSWER Comparative Risk Project. Execu-
tive Summary and Overview.
See 1062
OSWER Integrated Health and Safety Policy.
See 0920
             OFFICE OF SOLID WASTE
         AND EMERGENCY RESPONSE

  OSWER Integrated Health and Safety Stand-
  ard Operating Practices.
  See 0921
  OSWER Source Book: Training and  Tech-
  nology Transfer Resources.
  See 1283
  OSWER Source Book. Volume 1. Training
  and Technology Transfer Resources,  1992-
  1993.
  See 1284
  OSWER Source Book. Volume 2. Training
  and Technology Transfer Resources,  1992-
  1993.
  See 1285
  Overview  of  ERNS:  Emergency Response
  Notification System (ERNS) Fact Sheet.
  See 0935
  Overview of the Off-Site Policy for OSCs and
  RPMs.
  See 0433
  Overview  of  the Outyear  Liability Model
  (OLM).
  See 0106
  Performance of Risk Assessments in Reme-
  dial  Investigation/Feasibility  Studies  (Rl/
  FSs) Conducted  by Potentially Responsible
  Parties (PRPs).
 See 1102
  Performance  Tracking under  ARCS  Con-
 tracts.
 See 0061
 Permits and Permit 'Equivalency' Processes
 for CERCLA On-Site Response Actions.
 See 0435
 Policy for  Enforcement  Actions  against
 Transporters under CERCLA.
 See 0584
 Policy on Floodplains  and Wetland  Assess-
 ments for CERCLA Actions.
 See 0437
 Policy on Management of Post-Removal Site
 Control.
 See 1008
 Policy on  Recovering   Indirect Cost  in
 CERCLA  Section 107 Cost Recovery Ac-
 tions.
 See 0585
 Policy Towards Owners of  Residential Prop-
 erty at Superfund Sites.
 See 0586
 Political Subdivision Involvement in Super-
 fund.
 See 0479
 Preparation of Hazardous Waste Referrals.
 See 0588
 Priority for Health and  Safety Requirements,
 Especially  Medical  Surveillance Require-
 ments, for EPA Employees  Who Support
 OSWER Programs.
 See 0923
 Procedures  for  Documenting  Costs  for
 CERCLA  Section 107 Actions.
 See 0590
 Procedures for Transmittal  of CERCLA  and
 RCRA Civil Judicial Enforcement Case Pack-
 ages to Headquarters.
 See 0591
 Proposed Method to Evaluate the Effective-
 ness of Community Involvement  in  Super-
fund (Superfund Management Review: Rec-
ommendation Number 43.A).
See 0109
 PRP  Search  Supplemental  Guidance  for
Sites  in the Superfund Remedial Program.
See 0592
Public Awareness Signs at  Superfund Sites.
See 0481
                                                                                                                         SU-55

-------
    OFFICE Of SOLID WASTE
AND EMERGENCY RESPONSE
   ii111'         i     li'ii'i1:!   i  '«
   : Quality Assurance/Quality Control Guidance
   I for  Removal AcKyities: Sampling  QA/QC
   i Pfan and Data Validation Procedures.
    &H} ,0993
    Questions  and Answers About  the  State
   [Role In Remedy Selection at Non-Fund-Fi-
    nanced Enforcement Sites.
    See 0482
   • Real  Estate  Acquisition  Procedures  for
    USAGE Projects.
   | See 1133
   : Reassignment of CLP transportation  Func-
   hfans.         ......
    See 0063
    Rodelegation of Eh/11 Judicial Settlement Au-
   ..... tbofitles under  Delegation 14-13-B  and 14-
    14-E.
    See 0593
   ||| Regional  Guide: issuing Site-Specific  Treat-
   i .ability Variances for Contaminated Soils and
   "ris from  Land Disposal  Restrictions
              ........ .........
    Sea 1528
   , Regional Oversight of Federal Facility Clean-
    ups under CERCLA.
    See 0900
    Regional Pitot Projects and Initiatives.
    Soo0064
    Regional Pilots and Applications of Super-
    fund Accelerated Cleanup Model (SACM).
    Sea Olio
    Releasing Identities of  Potentially Responsi-
    ble Parties  in Response to FOIA Requests.
    See 0594
    Releasing Information to Potentially Respon-
    sible Parties at CERCLA Sites.
    See 0595
    Remedial Action Report: Documentation for
    Operable Unit Completion.
    S*a1134
    Remedial Investigation: Site Characterization
    and Treatability Studies.
    Sea 1106
    Reporting and Exchange  of  Information on
    State Enforcement Actions at National Prior-
    ities List Sites.
    See 0483
    Revised EPA Guidance on Parallel  Proceed-
   : ings.
    See 0597
    Revised Hazard Ranking System: An  Im-
    proved Tool for Screening Superfund Sites.
    Sea 0377
    Revised Hazard  Ranking  System:   Back-
    ground Information.
    See 0378
     Revised Hazard Ranking System: Qs and
     As.
     See 0381
     Revised Hazardous Waste Bankruptcy Guid-
     ance.
     Sea 0598
     Revised Hazardous Waste Bankruptcy Guid-
     ance, October 7, 1991.
     See 0599
   I ,  Ravlsed Interim Hnar Guidance on Indian In-
     voh/flment In the Superfund Program.
     See 0484
   jf  Revised Procedures for  Implementing  Off-
    ., Sit* Response Xctions.""
     See 0601
     R«ivisbn  of  C|RCLA Civil  Judicial Settle-
     ment Authorities under Delegations 14-13-B
   !  and 14-14-E.
     See 0602
   I  Revisions  to the Interim Guidance on PRP
   i  Participation in Remedial Investigations and
   ' • .Feasibility Studies.
   [" ! See 0603
   ii" • '• ,R(/FS Improvements.
     See  1108
      SUBJECT INDEX
RI/FS Streamlining.
See 1110
Risk Assessment  Guidance for Superfund.
Volume 1. Human Health Evaluation Manual.
Part A, April 1990.
See 1066
Risk Assessment  in  Superfund: A  Primer.
First Edition, September 1990.
See 1073
Role of Community Interviews in the Devel-
opment of a Community Relations Program
for Remedial Response.
See 0485
Role of  Expedited Response Actions under
SARA.
See 1116
Roles and Responsibilities of Deputy Project
Officers  and  Work  Assignment Managers
under the Technical  Enforcement Support
(TES) Contracts.
See 0069
Roles  and  Responsibilities  of  Regional
Project Officers, Zone Project Officers, Work
Assignment Managers and Contracting Offi-
cers for the RCRA Enforcement, Permitting
and Assistance Contracts (REPA).
See 0070
Roles  and  Responsibilities  of  Regional
Project  Officers  and  Headquarters Zone
Project  Officers  for  Management of TES
(TES 5) Contracts.
See 0604
Sampler's Guide to the Contract Laboratory
Program.
See 0071
Scope of the CERCLA Petroleum Exclusion
under Sections 101(14) and 104(a)(2).
See 0605
Site Classification Changes from  Enforce-
ment to Fund Lead.
See 0606
Site-Specific Contracting for Removals.
See 1011
Small Cost Recovery Referrals.
See 0869
Smart Moves in Superfund - Regional Initia-
 tives. Volume  1, Number 1, February 1992.
 See 0305
 Smart Moves  in  Superfund - Revitalization
 One Year Later. Volume 1, Number 3, Janu-
 ary 1993.
 See 0307
 Streamlining the RI/FS for CERCLA Munici-
 pal Landfill Sites.
 See 1118
 Streamlining the RI/FS for CERCLA Munici-
 pal Landfill Sites.
 See 1119
 Submittal of Ten-Point Settlement Analyses
 for CERCLA Consent Decrees.
 See 0871
 Suggested  ROD  Language  for  Various
 Ground Water Remediation Options.
 See 1475
 Summary of 'Guidance of Landowner Liabil-
 ity under Section 107(a)1  of CERCLA,  De
 Minimis   Settlements   under   Section
 122(g)(1)(b)  of  CERCLA,  and  Settlements
 with Prospective Purchasers of Contaminat-
 ed Property'.
 See 0872
 Summary of 'Guidance on  CERCLA Section
 106(a) UAOs for  RD/RA'.
 See 0873
 Summary of 'Guidance on Documenting De-
 cisions Not to Take Cost Recovery Actions'.
 See 0874
 Summary of 'Interim Guidance: Streamlining
 the CERCLA Settlement Decision  Process'.
 See 0875
Summary of 'Interim Guidelines for Preparing
NBARs'.
See 0876
Summary of 'Interim Policy on CERCLA Set-
tlements Involving Municipalities  and Munici-
pal Wastes'.
See 0877
Summary of 'Methodologies for Implementa-
tion  of  CERCLA  Section  122(g)(1)(a)  De
Minimis Waste Contributor Settlements'.
See 0878
Summary  of  'Notification  of Out-of-State
Shipments of Superfund Site Wastes'.
See 0438
Summary  of  'PRP  Search  Supplemental
Guidance for Sites in the Superfund  Remedi-
al Program'.
See 0879
Summary of 'Releasing Information to Poten-
tially Responsible Parties at CERCLA Sites'.
See 0880
Superfund Analytical Review and Oversight.
See 0995
Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Clean-
up Efforts Nationwide (Bog Creek Farm).
See 0940
Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Clean-
up Efforts Nationwide (City Industries).
See 0941
Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Clean-
up Efforts Nationwide (McKin Company).
See 0953
Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Clean-
up Efforts Nationwide,  Spring 1993 (Triana/
Tennessee River Site, Alabama).
See 0960
Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Clean-
up Efforts Nationwide (White Chemical).
See 0971
Superfund Cost Recovery Strategy.
See 0882
Superfund  Docket  Operations  Manual  for
Rulemaking Activities.
See 0081
Superfund Enforcement Strategy and Imple-
mentation Plan.
See 0833
Superfund Information Repositories and Ad-
 ministrative Records.
 See 0884
 Superfund  LDR Guide No. 1:  Overview  of
 RCRA Land Disposal Restrictions (LDRs).
 See 0440
 Superfund LDR Guide No. 2: Complying with
 the  California List Restrictions under Land
 Disposal Restrictions (LDRs).
 See 0441
 Superfund LDR  Guide No. 3: Treatment
 Standards and Minimum  Technology Re-
 quirements under Land Disposal Restrictions
 (LDRS).
 See 0442
 Superfund LDR Guide No. 4: Complying with
 the Hammer  Restrictions  under Land Dis-
 posal Restrictions (LDRs).
 See 0443
 Superfund LDR Guide  No. 5:  Determining
 When Land Disposal Restrictions (LDRs) Are
  'Applicable' to CERCLA Response Actions.
  See 0444
  Superfund LDR Guide No. 6A (2nd Edition)
  Obtaining a Soil and Debris Treatability Vari-
  ance for Remedial Actions.
  See 0445
  Superfund  LDR  Guide No. 7. Determining
  When Land Disposal Restrictions (LDRs) Are
  Relevant and  Appropriate  to  CERCLA Re-
  sponse Actions.
  See 0446
  SU-56

-------
                                                      SUBJECT INDEX
                                                                                                        ON-SITE INVESTIGATIONS
   Superfund  Progress. Aficionado's  Version.
   Progress as of September 30, 1992.
   See 0327
   Superfund:  Qualified Disadvantaged  Busi-
   ness Utilization in State Response
   See 0498
   Superfund Remedial Program Financial Man-
   agement Authority, Responsibilities and Pro-
   cedures.
   See 1137
   Superfund  Removal  Procedures:  Action
   Memorandum Guidance
   See 1012
   Superfund Responsiveness  Summaries (Su-
   perfund Management Review: Recommen-
   dation Number 43E).
  See 0125
  Superfund  Technical   Assistance   Grant
  (TAG) Handbook.
  See 0499
  Superfund Technical Assistance Grants.
  See 0502
  Superfund  Technical  Assistance  Grants
  (Fact Sheet).
  See 0503
  Supplemental  Guidance on  Performing  Risk
  Assessments in Remedial Investigation/Fea-
  sibility Studies (RI/FSs). Conducted by Po-
  tentially Responsible Parties  (PRPs).
  See 1078
  Supplemental Guidance to RAGS: Calculat-
  ing  the Concentration  Term.  Volume 1,
  Number 1, May 1992.
  See 1079
  Supporting   State    Attorneys   General
  CERCLA Remedial and Enforcement Activi-
  ties at NPL Sites.
  See 0506
  Technology  Transfer  Needs  Assessment
  1990.
  See 1354
  Timely   Initiation  of  Responsible  Party
  Searches, Issuance  of Notice Letters,  and
  Release of Information (Attachment XXII).
  See  0886
  Total Quality Management (TQM) and Qual-
  ity Assurance (QA) in Superfund.
  See 0996
 Transmittal of  Guidance  on Use and  En-
 forcement of CERCLA Information Requests
 and Administrative Subpoenas.
 See 0887
 Transmittal of  Model Consent  Decree for
 CERCLA Section  104(e)  Information   Re-
 quest Enforcement Actions.
 See 0888
 Transmittal of the Final Waste  Oil Interim
 Enforcement Guidance Document
 See 0889
 Treatability Studies Contractor Work Assign-
 ments.
 See 0076
 Treatability Studies  Under  CERCLA:   An
 Overview.
 See 1172
 U.S.  Bureau of Reclamation  Assistance to
 the Superfund Program.
 See 1138
 Understanding Superfund Risk Assessment
 See 0508
 United  States   Environmental  Protection
 Agency Model  CERCLA  RD/RA Consent
 Decree.
 See 0890
 USAGE Preplaced and Rapid  Response
 Contracts.
 See 1139
 Use of CERCLA Section 106  Unilateral  En-
forcement for Remedial Design and Remedi-
al Action: Strategy for Fiscal Year  1990
See 0891
      Use of Office  of  Research and Develop-
      ment's  Bioremediation  Expertise  in Super-
      fund Removal Program.
      See 1016
      Use of  Removal Approaches to Speed Up
      Remedial Action Projects.
      See 1140
      Use of Time and Materials and Cost Reim-
      bursement  Subcontracts for Remedial  Ac-
      tions under the Alternative  Remedial Con-
      tracting Strategy Contracts.
      See 1141
      USEPA Contract Laboratory Program Nation-
      al Functional Guidelines for Inorganic Data
      Review.
      See 0997
      User's Guide to the  Contract Laboratory Pro-
      gram.
      See 0079
     Waiver of Concurrence on De Minimis Gen-
     erator Settlements.
     See 0892
     Written Demand for CERCLA Cost  Recov-
     ery.
     See 0894
     Written  Demand for Recovery of Costs In-
     curred Under the Comprehensive Environ-
     mental Response, Compensation, and Liabil-
     ity Act (CERCLA).
     See 0895
 OFFICE OF SOLID WASTES AND
 EMERGENCY RESPONSE
     CERCLA Implementation of the Training Re-
     quirements of EPA Order 3500.1. Inspector
     Training.
     See 0518
     CERCLA  Notifications:   Emergency  Re-
     sponse  Notification  System  (ERNS) Fact
     Sheet.
     See 0926
 OFFICE  OF WASTE PROGRAMS
 ENFORCEMENT
     Endangerment Assessment Handbook.
     See  0530
 OHIO
     National Priorities List Sites: Ohio.
     See  0247
     National Priorities List Sites: Ohio.
     See 0248
     National Priorities List Sites: Ohio, 1992
     See 0249
    Site  Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
     PRP Listing by Site for Ohio.
    See 0723
    Site  Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
    PRP  Listing by Site for Ohio.
    See 0724
    Site  Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
    PRP  Listing by Site for Ohio.
    See 0725
OIL POLLUTION
    Exxon Valdez Oil Spill.  A Report to the
    President.
    See 0928
    National Oil and Hazardous Substances Pol-
    lution Contingency Plan (The NCP).
    See 0146
    Oil Spill  Contingency Planning:  National
    Status. A Report to the President.
    See 0931
    OPA Q's and A's: Overview of the Oil Pollu-
    tion Act of 1990.
    See 0933
    OPA Update:  Implementation of the Oil Pol-
    lution Act  of 1990. Volume 2, Number 1.
    See 0934
   Technology Evaluation Report SITE Program
    Demonstration Test, HAZCON  Solidification,
   Douglassville,  Pennsylvania. Volume 1.
   See 1569
      Update on Implementation of the Oil Pollu-
      tion Act of 1990. Volume 1, Number  1, Feb-
      ruary 1991.
      See 0936
      Update on Implementation of the Oil Pollu-
      tion Act of 1990. Volume 1, Number 2, April
      1991.
      See 0937
      Update on Implementation of the Oil Pollu-
      tion Act of 1990. Volume 1, Number 3. June
      1991.
      See 0938
  OIL POLLUTION ACT
      Facility Response Plans.
      See 0929
  OIL SPILLS
      Emergency Response Notification System.
      See 0927
      Exxon  Valdez Oil  Spill. A  Report  to the
      President.
      See 0928
      Facility Response Plans.
      See 0929
      National Oil and Hazardous Substances Pol-
      lution Contingency Plan (as Published  in the
      Federal Register, March 8, 1990).
      See 0145
     Oi|  Notifications: Emergency Response Noti-
     fication System (ERNS) Fact Sheet.
     See 0930
     Oil  Spill Prevention, Control,  and Counter-
     measures Program. Task Force Report.
     See 0932
     Overview of  ERNS: Emergency Response
     Notification System (ERNS) Fact Sheet.
     See 0935
     Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Clean-
     up  Efforts Nationwide,   Fall  1992.   (Wide
     Beach Section of Brant, New York).
     See 0948
     Understanding Oil Spills  and  Oil Spill Re-
     sponse.
     See 0978
     Use of Office  of Research  and Develop-
     ment's  Bioremediation Expertise in Super-
     fund Removal Program.
     See 1016
 OIL WASTES
     Technology Evaluation Report SITE Program
     Demonstration  Test, HAZCON  Solidification,
     Douglassville, Pennsylvania. Volume 1.
     See 1569
 OKLAHOMA
     National Priorities List Sites: Oklahoma.
     See  0250
     National Priorities List Sites: Oklahoma.
     See  0251
     National  Priorities  List  Sites:  Oklahoma,
     1992.
     See 0252
     Site  Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
     PRP Listing by Site for Oklahoma.
    See 0726
    Site  Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
    PRP Listing by Site for Oklahoma.
    See 0727
    Site  Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
    PRP  Listing by Site for Oklahoma.
    See 0728
ON-SCENE COORDINATES
    Characterizing soils for hazardous waste site
    assessments.
    See 1495
ON-SITE  INVESTIGATIONS
    Revised  Hazard Ranking  System: An  Im-
    proved Tool for Screening Superfund Sites.
    See 0377
                                                                                                                        SU-57

-------
OPEN PATH MONITORS
                                                       SUBJECT INDEX
    Ravteed Hazard  Ranking  System:  Back-
    ground Information.
    Sae 0378
OPEN PATH MONITORS
    Afr/Supwfund National Technical Guidance
   ; Sjudy Series:  Applicability of Open Path
   • Monitors for Superfund.
    S«a 1375
OREGON
    National Priorities List Sites: Oregon.
    SOB 0253
   ;' National Priorities Ust Sites: Oregon.
   it-Son 0254
   i National Priorities Ust Sites: Oregon, 1992.
    Saa 0255
   ' Sita  Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
    PRP Listing by Site for Oregon.
    Sea 0729
    Site  Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
    PRP Listing by Site for Oregon.
    Sea 0730
    SKa  Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
    PRP Listing by Site for Oregon.
    Sea 0731
 ORGANIC COMPOUNDS
    Applications Analysis Report: SITE Program,
    OF  Systems  Organics Extraction  System,
    New Badford, Massachusetts.
    Sea 1196
   •i Ground-Water Issue: Soil sampling and anai-
   : ysls for volatile organic compounds.
    Soa 1507
   I Guide for Conducting Treatabllity  Studies
    undor   CGRCLA:    Thermal   Desorption
     Remedy Selection. Interim Guidance.
     Saa 1170
     MoWto/Transportable   Incineration   Treat-
     ment
     Sea 1481
     Organic  Contract   Compliance  Screening
     System (OCCSS) Software (OLM01.8  Ver-
     sion 2) (for Microcomputers).
     Sea 0049
     Organic  Contract  Compliance  Screening
     System (OOCSS)  Software (OLM01.8  Ver-
     stort 3) (for Microcomputers).
     Sea 0050
     Organic  Contract  Compliance  Screening
     System (OCCSS)  Software (OLM01.8 Ver-
     sion 5) (for Microcomputers).
     Sea 0052
     Organic  Contract  Compliance  Screening
     System (OCCSS)  Software  (OLM01.8 Ver-
     sion 6) (for Microcomputers).
     See 0053
     Organic  Contract  Compliance  Screening
     System (OCCSS)  Software (SOW February
     1888) (for Microcomputers).
     Sea 0054
     Organic  Contract  Compliance  Screening
     System  (OCCSS)  Software  (SOW March
      1990) (Version 1) (for Microcomputers).
     See 0055
      Organic  Contract  Compliance  Screening
      System (OCCSS)  Software (SOW OLM01.8
      Vsrston  January   1992)  (Version  1)  (for
      Microcomputers).
      See 0056
      Organic  Contract  Compliance  Screening
      System.  Software for the PC (OLM01.8 Ver-
      ston 1). User Manual.
      See 0057
      Organic   Contract  Compliance   Screening
      System. Software for the PC (OLM01.8 Ver-
      sion 2) (User Manual).
      Sea 0058
      Organic  Contract  Compliance  Screening
      System, Software  for the PC (SOW March
   ;;;   1990, Version 1). User Manual.
      Sae 0059
   Organic  Contract  Compliance  Screening
   System. Software for the PC (Version June
   1990). User Manual.
   See 0060
   Comparison of Organic Emissions from Haz-
   ardous Waste Incinerators versus the 1990
   Toxic Release Inventory Air Releases.
   See 1397
   Comparison:  Organic  Emissions from Haz-
   ardous Waste Incinerators versus the 1990
   Toxics Release Inventory Air Releases.
   See 1217
   Solvent Extraction Processes: A Survey  of
   Systems in the SITE Program.
   See 1305
   Respirometric Methods for Determination  of
   Biodegradability and Biodegradation Kinetics
   for  Hazardous  Organic  Pollutant  Com-
   pounds.
   See 1427
   SITE-Emerging Technologies: Laser Induced
   Photochemical  Oxidative  Destruction  of
   Toxic Organics in  Leachates and  Ground-
   waters.
   See 1591
   Solvent Extraction Treatment.
   See 1306
ORGANIC CONTRACT COMPLIANCE
SCREENING SYSTEM
   Organic   Contract  Compliance  Screening
   System (OCCSS) Software  (OLM01.8 Ver-
   sion 2) (for Microcomputers).
   See 0049
   Organic   Contract  Compliance  Screening
   System (OCCSS) Software  (OLM01.8 Ver-
    sion 3) (for Microcomputers).
    See 0050
    Organic   Contract  Compliance Screening
    System (OCCSS)  Software  (OLM01.8 Ver-
    sion 6) (for Microcomputers).
    See 0053
    Organic   Contract Compliance Screening
    System (OCCSS) Software  (SOW  February
    1988) (for Microcomputers).
    See 0054
    Organic   Contract  Compliance  Screening
    System  (OCCSS)  Software (SOW March
    1990) (Version 1) (for Microcomputers).
    See 0055
    Organic  Contract  Compliance  Screening
    System (OCCSS) Software  (SOW  OLM01.8
    Version   January  1992) (Version  1)  (for
    Microcomputers).
    See 0056
    Organic  Contract  Compliance  Screening
    System. Software for the PC (OLM01.8 Ver-
    sion 1). User Manual.
    See 0057
    Organic  Contract  Compliance  Screening
    System. Software  for the PC (OLM01.8 Ver-
    sion 2) (User Manual).
    See 0058
    Organic  Contract  Compliance  Screening
    System.  Software for  the PC  (SOW March
     1990, Version 1). User Manual.
    See 0059
     Organic  Contract  Compliance  Screening
     System.  Software for the PC (Version June
     1990). User Manual.
     See 0060
 OUTYEAR LIABILITY MODEL
     Overview  of  the  Outyear Liability  Model
     (OLM).
     See 0106
     Overview  of  the Outyear Liability  Model
     (OLM).
     See 0107
 OXIDATION
     Chemical  Oxidation Treatment. Engineering
     Bulletin.
     See 1211
   Advanced  Oxidation Technologies  for the
   Treatment of Contaminated Groundwater.
   See 1429
   Field  Demonstration of the  UV/Oxidation
   Technology to Treat Ground Water Contami-
   nated with VOCs.
   See 1452
   SITE-Emerging Technologies: Laser Induced
   Photochemical  Oxidative   Destruction   of
   Toxic Organics in Leachates and  Ground-
   waters.
   See 1591
   Technology Evaluation  Report: Perox-Pure
   (Trade Name) Chemical  Oxidation Technolo-
   gy.
   See 1345
   Technology  Evaluation  Report: SITE Pro-
   gram Demonstration of the Ultrox Interna-
   tional Ultraviolet Radiation/Oxidation  Tech-
   nology.
   See 1351
OXYGEN COMBUSTION SYSTEM
   Control of Transient Incinerator Emissions
   with an Oxygen Based  Combustion System.
   See 1401
PARTICULATES
   Air/Superfund National  Technical  Guidance
    Study Series: Estimation of Air Impacts from
    Area Sources  of Paniculate  Matter Emis-
    sions at Superfund Sites.
    See 1385
PAST SYSTEM
    PAST: The Potential ARARs Selection Tool.
    See 0434
PATH OF POLLUTANTS
    Air/Superfund National Technical Guidance
    Series.  Superfund  Air Pathway  Analyses
    Review Criteria Checklists.
    See  1372
    Air/Superfund National Technical  Guidance
    Study  Series: Applicability of Open Path
    Monitors for Superfund.
    See 1375
    Ground-Water   Modeling    Compendium.
    Model Fact Sheets, Descriptions, Applica-
    tions and Assessment Framework.
    See 1458
    New Methods for Modeling the Transport of
    Metals from Mineral Processing Wastes  into
    Surface Waters.
    See 1590
    Superfund Fact Sheet: Exposure Pathways.
    See 0393
 PGP (PENTACHLOROPHENOL)
    Technology  Evaluation Report:  SITE  Pro-
    gram  Demonstration.  EPA  RREL's Mobile
    Volume Reduction Unit.
     See 1348
 PENALTIES
     BEN:  A Model to Calculate the  Economic
     Benefit of Noncompliance.  User's  Manual.
     See 0513
     Redelegation of Civil Judicial Settlement Au-
     thorities under Delegation 14-13-B  and 14-
     14-E.
     See 0593
     Revision  of CERCLA Civil Judicial Settle-
     ment Authorities under Delegations  14-13-B
     and 14-14-E.
     See 0602
     Waiver of Concurrence on De Minimis  Gen-
     erator Settlements.
     See 0892
  PENNSYLVANIA
      National  Priorities List Sites: Pennsylvania.
      See 0256
   SU-58

-------
                                                        SUBJECT INDEX
                                                                                                          POLLUTION ABATEMENT
     National  Priorities List Sites: Pennsylvania.
     See 0257
     National  Priorities List Sites: Pennsylvania,
     1992.
     See 0258
     Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
     PRP Listing by Site for Pennsylvania.
     See 0732
     Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
     PRP Listing by Site for Pennsylvania.
     See 0733
     Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
     PRP Listing by Site for Pennsylvania.
     See 0734
     Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Clean-
     up  Efforts Nationwide, Fall  1992.  (Lans-
     downe Radioactive  Residence  Site Profile).
     See 0946
 PENTACHLOROPHENOL
     Superfund Innovative Technology Evaluation
     Program  Demonstration Plan for  Westing-
     house  Bio-Analytic Systems  Pentachloro-
     phenol Immunoassays.
     See 1310
     Superfund Innovative Technology Evaluation
     (Site) Report for the Westinghouse Bio-Ana-
     lytic Systems Pentachlorophenol (PGP) Im-
     munoassays.
     See 1321
 PERFORMANCE EVALUATION
     EPA SITE Demonstration of the Horsehead
     Resource Development Company Flame Re-
    actor Technology.
    See 1242
 PERFORMANCE STANDARDS
    Model Performance Standards for Superfund
    Project Officers, Deputy Project Officers, and
    Work Assignment Managers/Delivery Order
    Officers.
    See 0045
 PERIODICALS
    RCRA,  Superfund Monthly Hot Line Reports.
    See 0303
 PEROX-PURE CHEMICAL OXIDATION
TECHNOLOGY
    Technology Evaluation  Report: Perox-Pure
    (Trade Name) Chemical Oxidation Technolo-
    gy.
    See 1345
PERSONAL COOLING DEVICES
    Evaluation of Personal  Cooling  Devices for
    Dioxin Clean-Up Operation.
    See 1248
PERSONNEL
    Community Relations: Use of Senior Envi-
    ronmental Employees in Superfund (Super-
    fund Management Review: Recommendation
    43.K.L).
    See 0088
PERSONNEL DEVELOPMENT
    CERCLA Implementation of Inspector Train-
    ing Requirements for OSCs/RPMs at the In-
    termediate Level in STEP and First-Line Su-
    pervisors.
    See 0517
    CERCLA Implementation of the Training Re-
    quirements of EPA Order 3500.1. Inspector
    Training.
    See 0518
    Mandatory Community  Relations Training.
    Superfund Management Review Implementa-
    tion  Product (Recommendation: No. 43.P(i)).
    See 0103
    Mandatory Training Requirements for OCSs
    and  RPMs.
    See 0104
    Superfund Progress: Fall/Winter 1992.
    See 0328
 PESTICIDES
     On-Site  Methods for Assessing  Chemical
     Impact on the Soil Environment Using Earth-
     worms:  A  Case Study  at  the  Baird and
     McGuire Superfund  Site, Holbrook,  Massa-
     chusetts.
     See 1521
     Will Soil Working Work for the Sand Creek
     Superfund Site.
     See 1548
     Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Clean-
     up Efforts Nationwide, Spring 1993 (Powers-
     ville Site Profile, Peach County, Georgia).
     See 0958
 PETROLEUM PRODUCTS
     Treatment of  Nonhazardous  Petroleum-Con-
     taminated  Soils by  Thermal  Desorption
     Technologies.
     See 1547
 PHENOL/PENTACHLORO
     Alternative  Biological Treatment  Processes
     for Remediation of Creosote-and PGP-Con-
     taminated Materials:  Bench-Scale Treatabil-
     ity Studies.
     See 1418
     Bench-Scale  Evaluation of Alternative Bio-
     logical Treatment Processes for the Remedi-
     ation of Pentachlorophenol-  and Creosote-
     Contaminated Materials: Slurry-Phase Biore-
     mediation.
     See 1419
     Bench-Scale Evaluation of Alternative Bio-
     logical Treatment Processes for the Remedi-
     ation of Pentachlorophenol-  and Creosote-
     Contaminated Materials: Solid-Phase Biore-
     mediation.
     See 1420
     Biodegradation of Creosote and Pentachlor-
     ophenol  in  Contaminated   Groundwaten
     Chemical and  Biological Assessment.
     See 1432
     Detoxification of Pentachlorophenol and Cre-
     osote Contaminated  Groundwater by Physi-
     cal Extraction: Chemical and Biological As-
     sessment.
     See 1438
PHENOLS
     Health Effects Assessment for Phenol.
    See 1045
PHOTOCHEMICAL REACTIONS
    SITE-Emerging Technologies: Laser Induced
     Photochemical  Oxidatiye  Destruction  of
    Toxic Organics in Leachates and Ground-
    waters.
    See 1591
PILOT PLANTS
    Pilot-Scale  Incineration  of  Contaminated
    Sludges  from  the  Bofors-Nobel Superfund
    Site.
    See 1289
PILOT PROGRAMS
    Regional Pilots and  Applications of Super-
    fund Accelerated Cleanup Model (SACM).
    See 0110
PLANNING
    Implementation Plan for the Record of Deci-
    sion for Disposal of Hanford  Defense High-
    Level, Transuranic, and Tank Wastes.
    See 1266
PLANTS (BOTANY)
    Application of  a  Plant Test System  in the
    Identification of Potential Genetic Hazards at
    Chemical Waste Sites.
    See 1194
PLASMA CENTRIFUGAL  FURNACES
    Technology  Evaluation  Report of Retech's
    Plasma Centrifugal Furnace. Volume 1.
    See 1342
     Technology  Evaluation  Report of Retech's
     Plasma Centrifugal Furnace. Volume 2.
     See 1343
 PLASMA FURNACES
     Retech,  Inc., Plasma  Centrifugal Furnace:
     Applications  Analysis Report.
     See 1295
     Technology  Evaluation  Report  of Retech,
     Inc., Plasma Centrifugal Furnace. Volume 1.
     See 1340
     Technology  Evaluation  Report  of Retech,
     Inc., Plasma Centrifugal Furnace. Volume 2.
     See 1341
 PLASMA HEATING
     Factors Affecting the Applicability of Plasma
     Systems  to the Cleanup of Superfund Sites.
     See 1250
 PNEUMATIC  FRACTURING EXTRACTION
     Accutech  Pneumatic  Fracturing  Extraction
     and Hot Gas Injection, Phase 1. Applications
     Analysis Report.
     See 1190
     Technology Evaluation Report: Site Program
     Demonstration  Test.  Accutech   Pneumatic
     Fracturing Extraction and Hot Gas Injection,
     Phase 1.  Volume 1.
     See 1352
 PO*WW*ER SYSTEM
     Chemical     Waste    Management,    Inc.
     PO*WW*ER  (Trade  Name)  Evaporation-
     Catalytic  Oxidation Technology. Technology
     Evaluation Report. Volume 1.
     See 1213
     Chemical     Waste    Management,    Inc.
     PO*WW*ER  (Trade  Name)  Evaporation-
     Catalytic  Oxidation Technology. Technology
     Evalution  Report. Volume 2.
     See 1214
    CWM PO*WW*ER (Trade Name)  Evapora-
    tion-Catalytic  Oxidation Technology: Applica-
    tions Analysis Report.
    See 1225
 POINT OF ENTRY TREATMENT
    Small Systems Meet Superfund  Challenge
    with Point-of-Entry Treatment Units.
    See 1304
 POLLUTANT RELEASES
    Questions and Answers on Release Notifica-
    tion Requirements and  Reportable Quantity
    Adjustments.
    See 1149
 POLLUTION
    Characterization of Contaminated Soil from
    the Montclair/Glen Ridge, New Jersey,  Su-
    perfund Sites.
    See 1493
    Dealing with Toxic Polluted Sediments in the
    Great Lakes Basin.
    See 1582
    International Conference on New Frontiers
    for  Hazardous Waste  Management (Third)
    Proceedings.  Held in Pittsburgh, Pennsylva-
    nia on September 10-13,1989.
    See 1278
    Superfund Fact Sheet: Arsenic.
    See 0488
POLLUTION ABATEMENT
    BEN: A Model to Calculate the Economic
    Benefit  of Noncompliance. User's Manual.
    See 0513
    BEN: A Model to Calculate the Economic
    Benefits of Noncompliance.  User's Manual
    (Revised).
    See 1205
                                                                                                                          SU-59

-------
POLLUTION CONTROL
       SUBJECT INDEX
   ;;; BEN Model: Calculates Violators' Economic
    Benefits from  Noncompliance (Version 4.0}
    (for Microcomputers).
    Sao 0514
    National OX and Hazardous Substances Pol-
    lution Contingency Plan (The NCP).
    See 0146
    RCRA, Soparfund Monthly Hot Una Reports.
   ,j'3^0303'
POLLUTION CONTROL
    Accessing Federal Data Bases for Contami-
    nated  Site  Clean-Up  Technologies (Third
   "Edition).     	
    See 1185
   i Accessing Federal Data Bases for Contami-
   Jftated Site Clean-Up Technologies.
    See 1188
   i; Administrative Guidance for the FIT to ARCS
   • (FIT/ARCS) Transition.	
    See 0017
    Audits and the Superfund Program Manager.
    Sea 0087
    Characterization  Protocol  for  Radioactive
    Contaminated Sons.
    Sea 1494
    Considerations in  Ground-Water  Remedi-
    ation at Superfund  Sites  and RCRA Facili-
    ties: Update.
    Sea 1437
    Contracting and Subcontracting Guide to the
    Suportund Program.
    Sea 0023
    Dobarmont and Suspension.
    Soo0470
    Development  of  Electro-Acoustic  Soil  De-
    contamination  (ESD) Process for In situ Ap-
    plications.
    Sea 1498
    ECO Update: Ecological Assessment of Su-
    perfund  Sites. An  Overview.  Volume  1,
    Number 2, December 1991.
    Sea 1019
    ECO Update: The Role of BTAGs in Ecologi-
    cal Assessment Volume 1,  Number 1, Sep-
    tember 1991.
    See 1020
   ': Estimating  Potential  for  Occurrence  of
    DNAPL at Superfund Sites.
    Sea 1442
    Forum  on  Innovative  Hazardous  Waste
    Treatment  Technologies:  Domestic   and
    International.  Held  in Atlanta,  Georgia  on
    June 19-21,1989. Technical Papers.
    See 1253
    Guidance on  Remedial  Actions for Super-
    fund Sites with PCB Contamination.
    Sea 1260
    Guidance on  Remedial  Actions for Super-
    fund Sites with PCB Contamination.
    Se«1261
    Guide  to Community involvement  for  Site
   !!" Assessment Managers.
    Sea 0476
    Homeowners   Exempted  from   Superfund
   ; Cleanup Costs: National Policy Overview.
   '" Sea 0426	
    Implementation of the Alternative  Remedial
    Contracting  Strategy  (ARCS)  Task  Force
    Recommendations: Transmittal of the  Imple-
    mentation Plan.
    Sea 0030
    Implementation of the Superfund Alternative
    Remedial  Contracting  Strategy   (ARCS):
   , R«port of the Administrator's Task Force.
    Implementation Plan.
    See 0032
    Management  Review of the Superfund  Pro-
    gram.
    See 0101
Management Review of the Superfund Pro-
gram: Implementation Plan.
See 0102
Methods for Evaluating the  Attainment  of
Cleanup  Standards.  Volume  2.  Ground
Water.
See 1469
National Priorities List Book Set.
See 0147
National Priorities List Sites: Alabama.
See 0148
National Priorities List Sites: Alabama.
See 0149
National Priorities List Sites: Alabama, 1992.
See 0150
National Priorities List Sites: Alaska.
See 0151
National Priorities List Sites: Alaska.
See 0152
National  Priorities  List Sites:  Alaska,  1992.
See 0153
National   Priorities  List  Sites:  American
Samoa, Guam, and the Trust Territories.
See 0154
National   Priorities  List  Sites:  American
Samoa, Guam and Trust Territories.
See 0155
National  Priorities  List  Sites: Arizona and
Nevada.
See 0156
National  Priorities  List  Sites: Arizona and
Nevada.
See 0157
National Priorities List  Sites: Arizona and
Nevada, 1992.
See 0158
National Priorities List Sites: Arkansas.
See 0159
National Priorities List Sites: Arkansas.
See 0160
National Priorities List Sites: Arkansas, 1992.
See 0161
National Priorities List Sites: California.
See 0162
National Priorities  List Sites:  California and
Hawaii.
See 0163
National Priorities  List Sites:  California and
Hawaii, 1992.
See 0164
National Priorities List Sites: Colorado.
See 0165
National Priorities List Sites: Colorado.
See 0166
National Priorities List Sites: Colorado, 1992.
See 0167
National Priorities List Sites: Connecticut.
See 0168
National Priorities List Sites: Connecticut.
See 0169
National Priorities  List Sites:  Connecticut,
1992.
See 0170
National Priorities List Sites: Delaware.
See 0171
National Priorities List Sites: Delaware.
See 0172
National Priorities List Sites: Delaware, 1992.
See 0173
National Priorities List Sites: Florida.
See 0174
National Priorities List Sites: Florida.
See 0175
 National Priorities List Sites: Florida, 1992.
See 0176
National Priorities List Sites: Georgia.
See 0177
 National Priorities  List Sites: Georgia.
See 0178
 National Priorities List Sites:  Georgia, 1992.
 See 0179
National Priorities List Sites: Hawaii.
See 0180
National Priorities List Sites: Idaho.
See 0181
National Priorities List Sites: Idaho.
See 0182
National Priorities List Sites: Idaho, 1992.
See 0183
National Priorities List Sites: Illinois.
See 0184
National Priorities List Sites: Illinois.
See 0185
National Priorities  List Sites: Illinois, 1992.
See 0186
National Priorities List Sites: Indiana.
See 0187
National Priorities List Sites: Indiana.
See 0188
National Priorities  List  Sites:  Indiana, 1992.
See 0189
National Priorities List Sites: Iowa.
See 0190
National Priorities List Sites: Iowa.
See 0191
National Priorities List Sites: Iowa,  1992.
See 0192
National Priorities List Sites: Kansas.
See 0193
National Priorities List Sites: Kansas.
See 0194
National Priorities  List  Sites:  Kansas, 1992.
See 0195
National Priorities List Sites: Kentucky.
See 0196
National Priorities List Sites: Kentucky.
See 0197
National Priorities List Sites: Kentucky, 1992.
See 0198
National Priorities List Sites: Louisiana.
See 0199
National Priorities List Sites: Louisiana.
See 0200
National Priorities List Sites: Louisiana, 1992.
See 0201
National Priorities List Sites: Maine.
See 0202
National Priorities List Sites: Maine.
See 0203
National  Priorities  List  Sites: Maine,  1992.
See 0204
National Priorities List Sites: Maryland.
See 0205
National Priorities List Sites: Map/land.
See 0206
National Priorities List Sites: Maryland, 1992.
See 0207
National Priorities  List Sites:  Massachusetts.
See 0208
National Priorities  List Sites:  Massachusetts.
See 0209
National Priorities  List Sites:  Massachusetts,
1992.
See 0210
National Priorities List Sites: Michigan.
See 0211
National Priorities List Sites: Michigan.
See 0212
National Priorities  List Sites: Michigan, 1992.
See 0213
 National Priorities List Sites: Minnesota.
See 0214
National Priorities List Sites: Minnesota.
See 0215
National  Priorities List  Sites:   Minnesota,
 1992.
 See 0216
 National Priorities  List Sites: Mississippi.
 See 0217
 SU-60
     iilliiliilililli  	tililiiiililii	iiiilM^^^	lilliiiil	iiiiiiliti. iitllll	Illii	i/iiLi,,:!	ii,ili,ilii,i,	Hi	aiiiJIilli!:	.I,1	lii	iiiiiilil	I!-' iliiii	I	in:,-,1;	ill,!.;iii,	ill.;	i,i;

-------
                                                         SUBJECT INDEX
                                                                                                                  POLLUTION CONTROL
  National Priorities List Sites: Mississippi.
  See 0218
  National  Priorities  List  Sites:  Mississippi
  1992.
  See 0219
  National Priorities List Sites: Missouri.
  See 0220
  National Priorities List Sites: Missouri
  See 0221
  National Priorities List Sites: Missouri, 1992
  See 0222
  National Priorities List Sites: Montana
  See 0223
  National Priorities List Sites: Montana
  See 0224
  National Priorities List Sites: Montana, 1992
  See 0225
  National Priorities List Sites: Nebraska
  See 0226
  National Priorities List Sites: Nebraska.
  See 0227
  National  Priorities  List  Sites:  Nebraska
  1992.
  See 0228
  National Priorities List Sites:  New Hamp-
  shire.
  See 0229
  National Priorities  List Sites:  New Hamp-
  shire.
  See 0230
  National Priorities  List Sites:  New Hamp-
  shire, 1992.
  See 0231
  National Priorities List Sites: New Jersey.
  See 0232
  National Priorities List Sites: New Jersey.
 See 0233
 National Priorities List  Sites:  New  Jersey
  1992.
 See 0234
 National Priorities List Sites:  New  Mexico.
 See 0235
 National Priorities List Sites:  New  Mexico.
 See 0236
 National Priorities List Sites:  New  Mexico,
 1992.
 See 0237
 National Priorities List Sites: New York.
 See 0238
 National Priorities List Sites: New York.
 See 0239
 National Priorities  List Sites:  New  York
 1992.
 See 0240
 National  Priorities  List Sites:  North  and
 South Dakota.
 See 0241
 National  Priorities  List Sites:  North  and
 South Dakota, 1992.
 See 0242
 National Priorities List Sites:  North Carolina
 See 0243
 National Priorities List Sites:  North Carolina.
 See 0244
 National Priorities List Sites:  North Carolina,
 1992.
 See 0245
 National Priorities List Sites: North  Dakota
 and South Dakota.
 See 0246
 National Priorities List Sites: Ohio.
 See 0247
 National Priorities List Sites: Ohio.
 See 0248
 National Priorities List Sites: Ohio, 1992
 See 0249
 National Priorities List Sites: Oklahoma.
See 0250
 National Priorities List Sites: Oklahoma.
See 0251
  National  Priorities  List  Sites:  Oklahoma,
  1992.
  See 0252
  National Priorities List Sites: Oregon.
  See 0253
  National Priorities List Sites: Oregon.
  See 0254
  National  Priorities List Sites: Oregon,  1992
  See 0255
  National  Priorities  List Sites: Pennsylvania
  See 0256
  National  Priorities  List Sites: Pennsylvania.
  See 0257
  National  Priorities  List Sites: Pennsylvania,
  1992.
  See 0258
  National Priorities List Sites: Puerto Rico.
  See 0259
  National Priorities List Sites: Puerto Rico.
  See 0260
  National Priorities List Sites: Puerto Rico and
  Virgin Islands, 1992.
  See 0261
  National Priorities List Sites: Rhode Island.
  See 0262
  National Priorities List Sites: Rhode Island.
  See 0263
  National Priorities List Sites: Rhode Island,
  1992.
  See 0264
  National Priorities List Sites Set (1991).
  See 0265
  National Priorities List Sites: South Carolina.
  See 0266
  National Priorities List Sites: South Carolina.
 See 0267
  National Priorities List Sites: South Carolina,
  1992.
 See 0268
 National Priorities List Sites: Tennessee.
 See 0269
 National Priorities List Sites: Tennessee.
 See 0270
 National Priorities  List Sites:  Tennessee,
 1992.
 See 0271
 National Priorities List Sites: Texas.
 See 0272
 National Priorities List Sites: Texas.
 See 0273
 National Priorities  List Sites: Texas, 1992.
 See 0274
 National  Priorities List  Sites: The  United
 States Territories, 1992.
 See 0275
 National Priorities List Sites: Utah.
 See 0276
 National Priorities List Sites: Utah.
 See 0277
 National Priorities List Sites: Utah, 1992.
 See 0278
 National Priorities List Sites: Vermont.
 See 0279
 National Priorities List Sites: Vermont.
 See 0280
 National Priorities List Sites: Vermont, 1992.
 See 0281
 National Priorities List Sites: Virginia.
 See 0282
 National Priorities List Sites: Virginia.
 See 0283
 National Priorities List Sites: Virginia, 1992.
 See 0284
 National Priorities List Sites: Washington.
 See 0285
 National Priorities List Sites: Washington.
See 0286
National Priorities  List Sites:  Washington,
 1992.
See 0287
  National  Priorities  List Sites: West Virginia.
  See 0288
  National  Priorities  List Sites: West Virginia.
  See 0289
  National  Priorities  List Sites: West Virginia,
  1992.
  See 0290
  National Priorities List Sites: Wisconsin.
  See 0291
  National Priorities List Sites: Wisconsin.
  See 0292
  National  Priorities  List  Sites:  Wisconsin,
  1992.
  See 0293
  National Priorities List Sites: Wyoming.
  See 0294
  National Priorities List Sites: Wyoming.
  See 0295
  National Priorities List Sites: Wyoming, 1992.
  See 0296
  NPL  Characterization  Project:  National Re-
  sults.
  See 0355
  NPL Characterization Project: Region 1 Re-
  sults.
  See 0356
  NPL Characterization Project: Region 3 Re-
  sults.
  See 0357
  NPL Characterization Project: Region 4 Re-
  sults.
  See 0358
  NPL Characterization Project: Region 5 Re-
 sults.
 See 0359
  NPL Characterization Project: Region 6 Re-
 sults.
 See 0360
 NPL Characterization Project:  Region 7 Re-
 sults.
 See 0361
 NPL Characterization Project: Region 8  Re-
 sults.
 See 0362
 NPL Characterization Project: Region 9  Re-
 sults.
 See 0363
 NPL Characterization Project: Region 10 Re-
 sults.
 See 0364
 Oil  Spill  Contingency  Planning:  National
 Status. A Report to the President.
 See 0931
 Political  Subdivision  Involvement  in  Super-
 fund.
 See 0480
 Progress Toward  Implementing Superfund.
 Fiscal Year 1988.
 See 0299
 Progress Toward  Implementing Superfund.
 Fiscal Year 1989.
 See 0300
 Control  Technologies for  Remediation of
 Contaminated Soil and Waste  Deposits at
 Superfund  Lead Battery Recycling Sites.
 See 1221
 Revised  Hazard Ranking System: Evaluating
 Sites After Waste Removals.
 See 0379
 Revised  Hazard  Ranking  System  (HRS):
 Final Rule.
 See 0380
 Risk Assessment  Guidance  for Superfund.
Volume 1.  Human  Health Evaluation  Manual
 (Part B).
See 1067
                                                                                                                                 SU-61

-------
                                                                         • If'WU |ni »'! .|!'.111, i
POLLUTION CONTROL EQUIPMENT
                                                       SUBJECT INDEX
    Risk  Assessment Guidance for Superfund.
    Volume 1. Human Health Evaluation Manual
    CPart B, Development of Risk-Based Prelimi-
    nary Remediation Goals).
    See 1068
   liRisk  Assessment Guidance for Superfund.
   h Volume 1. Human "Health Evaluation Manual
    (PartC).
    See 1069
    Risk  Assessment Guidance for Superfund.
    Volume 1. Human Health Evaluation Manual
    (Part C, Risk Evaluation of Remedial Alterna-
    tives).
    Sea 1070
    Site Assessment Evaluating Risks at Super-
    fund  Sites.
   '	See 1076 	1,"   1,1
    Specifications and  Guidance  for Contami-
    nant-Free Sample Containers.
    Sea 0994
    SRJS System Overview and User's Guide.
   f^e? 0112
   ""Standard Operating Safety Guides.
    Sea 0925
    Superfund  Accelerated" Cleanup  Bulletin.
   - Volume 1, Number 1. Presumptive Remedies
   11	forMurfclpalUndfill Sites.
    See 0117
    Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Clean-
    up Efforts  Nationwide, Fall  1993  (Johns-
    Manville Site Profile, Illinois).
    See  0952
    Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Clean-
    up Efforts Nationwide, Spring  1993 (Fulton
    Terminals Site Profile, Oswego County, NY).
   ,	See 0955
    Superfund Contracts Management Issues.
    Sea 0072
   •:l|Supfflrfund  Fact Sheet: The Removal Pro-
   ' "gram.
    Sea 0495
    SUPERFUND: Focusing on the Nation at
    Large. A Decade  of  Progress at National
    Priorities Ust Sites.
    Sea 0321
   ;	Superfund:  Focusing on the Nation at Large.
   :=:'= "A Decade of Progress at National Priorities
   '!'','LNst Sites.	
    Sea 0322
   P Superfund: Focusing on the Nation at Large.
   ill 1991 Update.
    See 0323
   .';„' SuporfutKl  Guide:  Reportable Quantity Ad-
    1 iustrnwrt for Methyl Isocyanate (MIC).
     See 1152
     Superfund  Progress -  Aficionado's Version
   	(Progress as of March 31,1992).
     See 0326
     Superfund Progress, Spring 1992.
     S«0329
     Superfund  Removal Procedures: Public Par-
   " UcipaSon Guidance for On-Soene Coordina-
   :  tors: Community Relations and the Adminis-
     trative Record.
     See 1014
   "  Superfund  Removal   Procedures:  Removal
     Enforcement Guidance for On-Scene Coordi-
     nators.
     See 1015
     Superfurid  Strategic  Plan and Implementa-
     tion Strategy Fiscal Year 1994.
     See 0126
     Superfund Strategic  Plan and Implementa-
     tion Strategy Fiscal Year 1994: Office and
     Division Plans.
     Soo 0127
   I'., Superfund Technical Assistance Grants Pro-
   f1 ,i! gram: Regional Guidance Manual.
     See 0504
   Technology  Evaluation  Report.  SITE Pro-
   gram Demonstration, Resources Conserva-
   tion  Company,  Basic   Extractive  Sludge
   Treatment (B.E.S.T. (Trade  Name)),  Grand
   Calumet River, Gary, Indiana. Volume 1.
   See 1593
   Technology  Evaluation  Report.  SITE Pro-
   gram Demonstration, Resources Conserva-
   tion  Company,  Basic   Extractive  Sludge
   Treatment (B.E.S.T. (Trade  Name)),  Grand
   Calumet River, Gary, Indiana. Volume 2. Part
   1.
   See 1594
   Technology  Evaluation  Report.  SITE Pro-
   gram Demonstration, Resources Conserva-
   tion  Company,  Basic  Extractive  Sludge
   Treatment  (B.E.S.T. (Trade Name)), Grant
   Calumet River, Gary, Indiana. Volume 2. Part
   2.
   See 1595
   Technology Evaluation Report.  SITE Pro-
   gram Demonstration, Resources Conserva-
   tion  Company,  Basic  Extractive   Sludge
   Treatment  (B.E.S.T. (Trade Name)), Grand
   Calumet River, Gary, Indiana. Volume 2. Part
   3.
   See 1596
   Technology Selection Guide for Wood Treat-
   er Sites.
   See 1122
   Update No. 2 to 'Procedures for Completion
   and Deletion of NPL Sites'.
   See 0395
   Update on  Implementation of the Oil Pollu-
   tion Act of 1990. Volume 1, Number  1, Feb-
   ruary 1991.
   See 0936
   Update on  Implementation of the Oil Pollu-
   tion Act of 1990. Volume 1, Number 2, April
   1991.
   See 0937
   Update on  Implementation of the Oil Pollu-
   tion Act of 1990. Volume 1, Number 3, June
   1991.
   See 0938
   Vendor Information  System for Innovative
   Treatment Technologies (VISITT). Number 1.
   See 1370
POLLUTION CONTROL EQUIPMENT
   EPA SITE Demonstration of the Hbrsehead
   Resource Development Company Flame Re-
   actor Technology.
   See 1242
POLLUTION LAWS
   Compendium  of   CERCLA  ARARs  fact
   sheets and directives.
   See 0417
   Evaluation  of Cleanup Levels for Remedial
   Action at CERCLA (Comprehensive Environ-
    mental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
    ity Act) Sites  Based on a Review  of  EPA
    (Environmental  Protection Agency) Records
   of Decision.
    See 1245
    OPA Q's and A's: Overview of the Oil Pollu-
    tion Act of 1990.
    See 0933
    Superfund  Fact Sheet: An Overview.
    See 0487
POLLUTION MONITORING
    Technology Evaluation  Report: SITE  Pro-
    gram.  CF  Systems  Organics  Extraction
    System,   New   Bedford,   Massachusetts.
    Volume 2.
    See 1347
POLLUTION REGULATION
    CERCLA   Compliance  with  Other  Laws
    Manual. Part 1. Interim Final.
    See 0409
POLLUTION REGULATIONS
    Criminal Investigations  and the Superfund
    Program.
    See 0469
    Guidance for Federal Facilities on Release
    Notification  Requirements  under CERCLA
    and SARA Title III.
    See 0898
    Guide to  Management of  Investigation-De-
    rived Wastes.
    See 0345
    Instructional  Package  on  Regulatory  Air
    Quality Modeling.  Part  1:  Videos  on the
    'Guideline on Air Quality Models (Revised)'
    and the Model Clearinghouse (Video).
    See 1412
    Management    of    Investigation-Derived
    Wastes during Site Inspections.
    See 0349
    Meeting Summary: National Advisory Council
    on  Environmental Policy  and  Technology
    (1st). Subcommittee  on Radiation Cleanup
    Regulation.  Held in Washington, DC. on Oc-
    tober 18-19, 1993.
    See 1059
    NACEPT Meeting. Held in Crystal City, Vir-
    ginia on February 11, 1994.
    See 0144
    Organic  Contract  Compliance  Screening
    System (OCCSS)  Software  (OLM01.8 Ver-
    sion 2) (for  Microcomputers).
    See 0049
    Organic  Contract  Compliance  Screening
    System. Software for the PC (OLM01.8 Ver-
    sion 2) (User Manual).
    See 0058
    Overview of Selected EPA (Environmental
    Protection  Agency) Regulations and Guid-
    ance  Affecting  POTW  (Publicly   Owned
    Treatment Works) Management.
    See 0432
    Progress Toward Implementing  Superfund,
    Fiscal Year 1990: A Report to the Congress.
    See 0301
    PAST: The Potential ARARs Selection Tool.
    See 0434
    Role  of Health  Research in Support of
    EPA's Regulatory Programs.
    See 1074
    Superfund   Administrative   Improvements:
     Reinventing Superfund.
    See 0312
     Superfund  Reauthorization: NACEPT Sub-
     committee  Handbook.
     See 0331
 POLLUTION SAMPLING
     Data Quality Objectives Decision Error Fea-
     sibility Trials  (DEFT)  Beta Version  1.01.
     User's Guide.
     See 0979
     Data Quality Objectives Process for Super-
     fund.
     See 0982
     Data Quality Objectives Process for Super-
     fund: interim Final Guidance.
     See 0983
     Data  Quality Objectives Process for Super-
     fund: Workbook.
     See 0984
 POLLUTION STANDARDS
     Organic  Contract  Compliance  Screening
     System  (OCCSS) Software  (OLM01.8  Ver-
     sion 5) (for Microcomputers).
     See 0052
 POLYCHLORINATED BIPHENYL
     Guidance  on Remedial Actions for Super-
     fund Sites with PCB Contamination.
     See 1261
  SU-62

-------
                                                         SUBJECT INDEX
                                                                                              POTENTIALLY RESPONSIBLE PARTIES
 POLYCHLORINATED BIPHENYLS
     EPA Engineering Issue: Technology Alterna-
     tives  for the Remediation  of PCB-Contami-
     nated Soil and Sediment.
     See 1501
     Framework  for Real-Time  Decision-Making:
     New Bedford  Harbor Pilot Dredging Study
     See 1587
     Guide  on Remedial  Actions at Superfund
     Sites with PCB Contamination.
     See 1262
     In-situ   Stabilization/Solidification   of  PCB
     (Polychlorinated    Biphenyls)-Contaminated
     Soil.
     See 1556
     International Waste Technologies/Geo-Con
     In  situ  Stabilization/Solidification:  Applica-
     tions Analysis Report.
     See 1557
     Application of 'Real-Time' Monitoring in De-
     cision  Making:  The  New  Bedford Harbor
     Pilot Dredging Project.
     See 1574
     SITE Demonstration of the CF Systems Or-
     ganics Extraction System.
     See 1301
     Superfund Fact Sheet: PCBs.
     See 0492
     Technology  Evaluation  Report: SITE Pro-
     gram.  CF   Systems  Organics  Extraction
     System,  New   Bedford,  Massachusetts.
     Volume 1.
     See 1346
     Technology  Evaluation  Report: SITE Pro-
     gram.  CF   Systems  Organics  Extraction
     System,  New   Bedford,  Massachusetts.
    Volume 2.
    See 1347
PORTABLE EQUIPMENT
    Evaluation of Portable Gas Chromatographs
    See 1479
    Mobile/Transportable   Incineration  Treat-
    ment.
    See 1481
POTABLE WATER
    Remediation  Completed: But Is the Ground-
    water Meeting the Safe  Drinking Water Act
    Requirements.  Haztech  International  90.
    Held in Houston, Texas on May 8-10, 1990.
    See 1473
    Small  Systems Meet  Superfund Challenge
    with Point-of-Entry Treatment Units.
    See 1304
POTENTIAL RESPONSIBLE PARTY
    Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
    PRP Listing by Site for Region 1.
    See 0740
    Site Enforcement Tracking System  (SETS):
    PRP Listing by Site for Region 2.
    See 0745
    Site Enforcement Tracking System  (SETS):
    PRP Listing by Site for Region 3.
    See 0749
    Site Enforcement Tracking System  (SETS):
    PRP Listing by Site for Region 4.
    See 0754
    Site Enforcement Tracking System  (SETS)-
    PRP Listing by Site for Region 5.
    See 0759
    Site Enforcement Tracking System  (SETS):
    PRP Listing by Site for Region 6.
    See 0764
    Site Enforcement Tracking System  (SETS):
    PRP Listing by Site for Region 7.
    See 0769
    Site Enforcement Tracking System  (SETS):
    PRP Listing by Site for Region 8.
    See 0774
    Site Enforcement Tracking System  (SETS)-
    PRP Listing by Site for Region 9.
    See 0779
    Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
    PRP Listing by Site for Region 10.
    See 0784
    Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
    PRP National Listing Alphabetically by Party
    Name.
    See 0830
    Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
    PRP National Listing by Site.
    See 0836
POTENTIALLY RESPONSIBLE PARITES
    Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
    PRP Report by Site for Region 7, September
    26, 1991.
    See 0844
POTENTIALLY RESPONSIBLE PARTIES
    Evaluation  of, and Additional  Guidance  on,
    Issuance of Unilateral Administrative Orders
    (UAOs) for RD/RA.
    See 0538
    Extending the Tracking  of Analytical  Serv-
    ices to Potentially Responsible Party-Lead
    Superfund Sites (Supplemental Guidance on
    OSWER Directive 9240.0-2A).
    See 0986
    Guidance on  Oversight of Potentially Re-
    sponsible Party Remedial Investigations and
    Feasibility Studies. Volume 1.
    See 1094
    Guidance on  Oversight of Potentially Re-
    sponsible Party Remedial Investigations and
    Feasibility Studies. Volume 2.  Appendices.
    See 1095
    Guidance on Oversight  of  PRP Performed
    RD/RA.
    See 1130
    Interim Guidance on Potentially Responsible
    Party Participation in Remedial Investigations
    and Feasibility Studies.
    See 0561
    Model  Statement  of  Work for  a  Remedial
    Investigation and Feasibility Study Conduct-
    ed by Potentially Responsible Parties.
    See 0578
    Revised Policy on Discretionary Information
    Release under CERCLA.
    See 0600
   Site  Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
    Frequency by Party Name Report.
   See 0608
   Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
   Frequency by Party Name Report.
   See 0609
   Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
   Frequency by PRP Name Report, September
   26, 1991.
   See 0610
   Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
   National Alphabetical Report by PRP Name,
   September 26, 1991.
   See 0612
   Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
   National Frequency by PRP Name Report.
   See 0614
   Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
   National PRP Listing Alphabetically by  PRP
   Name.
   See 0615
   Site Enforcement Tracking  System (SETS):
   National PRP Listing by Site.
   See 0617
   Site Enforcement Tracking  System (SETS):
   National  PRP Listing by Site.
   See 0618
   Site Enforcement Tracking  System (SETS):
   National  PRP Report by Site, September 26,
   1991.
   See 0619
  Site Enforcement Tracking  System (SETS)
  (National - 3 1/2 Inch Diskette, IBM  PS/2
  Compatible) (for Microcomputers).
  See 0620
  Site Enforcement Tracking System  (SETS):
  PRP Listing by Site for Alabama.
  See 0622
  Site Enforcement Tracking System  (SETS):
  PRP Listing by Site for Alabama.
  See 0623
  Site Enforcement Tracking System  (SETS):
  PRP Listing by Site  for American  Samoa.
  See 0625
  Site Enforcement Tracking System  (SETS):
  PRP Listing by Site  for American  Samoa.
  See 0626
  Site Enforcement Tracking System  (SETS):
  PRP Listing by Site for Arizona.
  See 0628
  Site Enforcement Tracking System  (SETS):
  PRP Listing by Site for Arizona.
  See 0629
  Site Enforcement Tracking System  (SETS):
  PRP Listing by Site for Arkansas.
  See 0631
 Site Enforcement  Tracking System  (SETS):
 PRP Listing by Site for Arkansas.
 See 0632
 Site Enforcement  Tracking System (SETS):
 PRP Listing by Site for California.
 See 0634
 Site Enforcement  Tracking System (SETS):
 PRP Listing by Site for California.
 See 0635
 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
 PRP Listing by Site for Colorado.
 See 0637
 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
 PRP Listing by Site for Colorado.
 See 0638
 Site Enforcement Tracking  System (SETS):
 PRP Listing by Site for Connecticut.
 See 0640
 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
 PRP Listing by Site for Connecticut.
 See 0641
 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
 PRP Listing by Site for Delaware.
 See 0643
 Site Enforcement Tracking System  (SETS):
 PRP Listing by Site for Delaware.
 See 0644
 Site Enforcement Tracking System  (SETS):
 PRP Listing by Site for Florida.
 See 0646
 Site Enforcement Tracking System  (SETS):
 PRP Listing by Site for Florida.
 See 0647
 Site Enforcement Tracking System  (SETS):
 PRP Listing by Site for Georgia.
 See 0649
 Site Enforcement Tracking System  (SETS):
 PRP Listing by Site for Georgia.
 See 0650
 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
 PRP Listing by Site for Idaho.
 See 0652
 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
 PRP Listing by Site for Idaho.
 See 0653
 Site Enforcement  Tracking System (SETS):
 PRP Listing by Site for  Illinois.
See 0655
Site Enforcement  Tracking System (SETS):
 PRP Listing by Site for  Illinois.
See 0656
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Indiana.
See 0658
                                                                                                                             SU-63

-------
POTENTIALLY RESPONSIBLE PARTIES
      SUBJECT INDEX
    Site Enforcement Tracking  System (SETS):
    PRP Listing by Site for Indiana.
   "See 0659
    Site Enforcement Tracking  System (SETS):
    PHP Usting by Site for Iowa.
             .................................
    Site Enforcement Tracking  System (SETS):
    PRP UstSng by Site for Iowa.
    Soa 0662
    Site Enforcement Tracking  System (SETS):
    PRP Usting by Site for Kansas.
    See 0664
   "Die '.Enforcement" Tracking  System "(SETS):
    PRP, Usting by Site for Kansas.
    Seo0665
    Site Enforcement Tracking  System (SETS):
    PRP UsSng by Site for Kentucky.
    See 0667
    Site Enforcement Tracking  System (SETS):
    PRP Usting by Site for Kentucky.
    See 0668
    Site Enforcement Tracking  System (SETS):
   ' ERP Usting by Site for Louisiana.
    Soe 0670
   ! Site Enforcement Tracking  System (SETS):
   i EBP Usting by Site for Louisiana.
    See 0671
    Site Enforcement Tracking  System (SETS):
    PRP Usting by Site for Maine.
    See 0673
    Site Enforcement Tracking  System (SETS):
    PRP Usting by Site for Maine.
    See 0674
    Site Enforcement Tracking  System (SETS):
    PRP Usting by Site for Maryland.
    See 0676
    Site Enforcement Tracking  System (SETS):
    PRP Usting by Site for Maryland.
    See 0677
   iSite, Enforcement ..... Tracking  System (SETS):
    _ „ usling by site for Massachusetts.
    See 0679
    Site Enforcement Tracking  System (SETS):
    PRP Usting by Site for Massachusetts.
    Sec 0680
   11 Site Enforcement Tracking  System (SETS):
    ERP Ltetjng by Site for Michigan.
   !' See 0682
   ['Sjte Enforcement Trackjng  System (SETS):
   11 ..... PR p'Usting "by Site for Michigan.
   •See 0683 ............................
   i ate Enforcement tracking System (SETS):
    PRP Usting by Site for Minnesota.
    See 0685
    Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
    PRP Usting by Site for Minnesota.
    See 0686
    Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
    PRP Usting by Site for Mississippi.
    Sea 0688
    Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
    PRP Ustfng by Site for Mississippi.
    See 0689
   1 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
    PRP Usting by Site for Missouri.
    See 0691
    Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
    PRP Usting by Site for Missouri.
    See 0692
    Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
    PRP Usting by Site for Montana.
    See 0694
    Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
    PRP Usting by Site for Montana.
    See 0695
    Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
    PRP Usting by Site for Nebraska.
    Sea 0697
   - Site, Enforcement Trackjng System (SETS):
   5 PRP "Usting by "Site for Nebraska.
    See 0698
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Usting by Site for Nevada.
See 0700
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Usting by Site for Nevada.
See 0701
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for New Hampshire.
See 0703
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for New Hampshire.
See 0704
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for New Jersey.
See 0706
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Usting by Site for New Jersey.
See 0707
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for New Mexico.
See 0709
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for New Mexico.
See 0710
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Usting by Site for New York.
See 0712
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Usting by Site for New York.
See 0713
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for North Carolina.
See 0715
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Usting by Site for North Carolina.
See 0716
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for North Dakota.
See 0718
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for North Dakota.
See 0719
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by  Site for Northern Marianas.
See 0721
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by  Site for Northern Marianas.
See 0722
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Usting by Site for Ohio.
See 0724
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Ohio.
See 0725
Site Enforcement  Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Oklahoma.
See 0727
Site Enforcement  Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Oklahoma.
See 0728
Site Enforcement  Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Oregon.
See 0730
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Oregon.
See 0731
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Pennsylvania.
See 0733
Site Enforcement Tracking System  (SETS):
PRP Usting by Site for Pennsylvania.
See 0734
Site Enforcement Tracking System  (SETS):
PRP Usting by Site for Puerto Rico.
See 0736
Site Enforcement Tracking System  (SETS):
 PRP Listing by Site for Puerto Rico.
See 0737
Site Enforcement Tracking System  (SETS):
 PRP Listing by Site for Region 1.
See 0738
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing  by  Site for Region 1, January
22, 1992.
See 0741
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 1. Volume 1.
See 0742
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 2.
See 0743
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing  by  Site for Region 2, January
22,1992.
See 0746
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 2. Volume 2.
See 0747
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 3.
See 0743
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing  by  Site for Region 3, January
22,1992.
See 0750
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 3. Volume 3.
See 0751
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 4.
See 0752
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 4. Volume 4.
See 0756
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 5.
See 0757
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region  5, January
22, 1992.
See 0760
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing  by Site for Region 5. Volume 5.
See 0761
Site Enforcement  Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Usting by Site for Region 6.
See 0762
Site Enforcement  Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region  6, January
22, 1992.
See 0765
Site Enforcement  Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 6. Volume 6.
See 0766
Site Enforcement  Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Usting by Site for Region 7.
See 0767
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 7, January
22, 1992.
See 0770
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Usting by  Site for Region 7. Volume 7.
See 0771
Site Enforcement Tracking System  (SETS):
 PRP Listing by Site for Region 8.
See 0772
 Site Enforcement Tracking System  (SETS):
 PRP Listing by Site for Region 8, January
 22, 1992.
 See 0775
 Site Enforcement Tracking System  (SETS):
 PRP Listing by  Site for Region 8. Volume 8.
 See 0776
 Site Enforcement Tracking System  (SETS):
 PRP Listing by Site for Region 9.
 See 0777
 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
 PRP Listing by Site for Region 9.
 See 0778
 SU-64

-------
                                                     SUBJECT  INDEX
                                                                                                         PREREMEDIAL ACTIONS
 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
 PRP Listing by Site for Region 9, January
 22,1992.
 See 0780
 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
 PRP Listing by Site for Region 9. Volume 9.
 See 0781
 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
 PRP Listing by Site for Region 10.
 See 0782
 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
 PRP Listing by Site for Region 10, January
 22,1992.
 See 0785
 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
 PRP Listing by Site for Region 10. Volume
 10.
 See 0786
 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
 PRP Listing by Site for Rhode Island.
 See 0788
 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
 PRP Listing by Site for Rhode Island.
 See 0789
 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
 PRP Listing by Site for South Carolina.
 See 0791
 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
 PRP Listing by Site for South Carolina.
 See 0792
 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
 PRP Listing by Site for South Dakota.
 See 0794
 Site Enforcement Tracking  System (SETS):
 PRP Listing by Site for South Dakota.
 See 0795
 Site Enforcement Tracking  System (SETS):
 PRP Listing by Site for Tennessee.
 See 0797
 Site Enforcement Tracking  System (SETS):
 PRP Listing by Site for Tennessee.
 See 0798
 Site Enforcement Tracking  System (SETS):
 PRP Listing by Site for Texas.
 See 0800
 Site Enforcement Tracking  System (SETS):
 PRP Listing by Site for Texas.
 See 0801
 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
 PRP Listing by Site for Trust Territories.
 See 0803
 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
 PRP Listing by Site for Trust Territories.
 See 0804
 Site Enforcement  Tracking System (SETS):
 PRP Listing by Site for Utah.
 See 0806
 Site  Enforcement  Tracking System (SETS):
 PRP Listing by Site for Utah.
 See 0807
 Site  Enforcement  Tracking System  (SETS):
 PRP Listing by Site for Vermont.
 See 0809
 Site  Enforcement  Tracking System  (SETS):
 PRP Listing by Site for Vermont.
 See 0810
 Site  Enforcement  Tracking System  (SETS):
 PRP Listing by Site for Virginia.
 See 0811
 Site  Enforcement Tracking System  (SETS):
 PRP Listing by Site for Virginia.
See 0812
Site  Enforcement Tracking System  (SETS):
 PRP Listing by Site for Washington.
See 0814
Site  Enforcement Tracking System  (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Washington.
See 0815
Site  Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for West Virginia.
See 0817
 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
 PRP Listing by Site for West Virginia.
 See 0818
 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
 PRP Listing by Site for Wisconsin.
 See 0820
 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
 PRP Listing by Site for Wisconsin.
 See 0821
 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
 PRP Listing by Site for Wyoming.
 See 0823
 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
 PRP Listing by Site for Wyoming.
 See 0824
 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
 PRP National Frequency  by Party  Name,
 January 22,1992.
 See 0825
 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
 PRP National Listing Alphabetically by Party
 Name.
 See 0827
 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
 PRP National Listing Alphabetically by Party
 Name.
 See 0829
 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
 PRP National Listing Alphabetically by Party
 Name, January 22, 1992.
 See 0831
 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
 PRP National Listing by Site.
 See 0833
 Site Enforcement Tracking System  (SETS):
 PRP National Listing by Site.
 See 0834
 Site Enforcement Tracking System  (SETS):
 PRP National Listing by Site.
 See 0835
 Site Enforcement Tracking System  (SETS):
 PRP National Listing by Site, January 22,
 1992.
 See 0837
 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
 PRP Report by Site for Region 1, September
 26, 1991.
 See 0838
 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
 PRP Report by Site for Region 2, September
 26, 1991.
 See 0839
 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
 PRP Report by Site for Region 3, September
 26, 1991.
 See 0840
 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
 PRP Report by Site for Region 4, September
 26, 1991.
 See 0841
 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
 PRP Report by Site for Region 5, September
 26, 1991.
 See 0842
 Site Enforcement Tracking  System (SETS):
 PRP Report by Site for Region 6, September
 26, 1991.
 See 0843
 Site Enforcement Tracking  System (SETS):
 PRP Report by Site for Region 9,  September
 26, 1991.
 See 0846
 Site Enforcement Tracking  System (SETS):
 PRP Report by Site for Region 10, Septem-
 ber 26, 1991.
 See 0847
Site Enforcement Tracking System  (SETS)
 (Region 1-31/2 Inch Diskette IBM PS/2
Compatible) (for Microcomputers).
See 0849
     Site Enforcement Tracking  System (SETS)
     (Region 2-31/2 Inch  Diskette IBM PS/2
     Compatible) (for Microcomputers).
     See 0851
     Site Enforcement Tracking  System (SETS)
     (Region 3-3 1/2 Inch  Diskette IBM PS/2
  ,   Compatible) (for Microcomputers).
     See 0853
     Site Enforcement Tracking  System (SETS)
     (Region 4-31/2 Inch  Diskette IBM PS/2
     Compatible) (for Microcomputers).
     See 0855
     Site Enforcement Tracking  System (SETS)
     (Region 5-31/2 Inch  Diskette IBM PS/2
     Compatible) (for Microcomputers).
     See 0857
     Site Enforcement Tracking  System (SETS)
     (Region 6-31/2 Inch  Diskette IBM PS/2
     Compatible) (for Microcomputers).
     See 0859
     Site Enforcement Tracking  System (SETS)
     (Region 7-3 1/2 Inch  Diskette IBM PS/2
     Compatible) (for Microcomputers).
     See 0861
     Site Enforcement Tracking  System (SETS)
     (Region 8-31/2 Inch  Diskette IBM PS/2
     Compatible) (for Microcomputers).
     See 0863
     Site Enforcement Tracking  System (SETS)
     (Region 9-31/2 Inch Diskette IBM  PS/2
     Compatible) (for Microcomputers).
     See 0865
     Site Enforcement Tracking  System (SETS)
     (Region 10 - 3 1/2 Inch  Diskette IBM PS/2
     Compatible) (for Microcomputers).
     See 0867
     Superfund and Small Waste Contributors.
     See 0881
     Supplemental  Guidance on Performing Risk
     Assessments in Remedial Investigation/Fea-
    sibility Studies (RI/FSs).  Conducted by Po-
     tentially Responsible Parties (PRPs).
     See 1078
POTENTIALLY RESPONSIBLE PARTIES
(PRPS)
     Discussions with the Public Concerning NPL
    Listings.
    See 0339
PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT
    PA-Score  (Preliminary Assessment Score)
    User's Manual and Tutorial. Version 2.1.
    See 0367
    PA-Score  (Preliminary Assessment Score),
    Version 1.0 (for Microcomputers).
    See 0368
    PA-Score  Software,  Version  1.0.  Users
    Manual and Tutorial.
    See 0371
PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT PETITION
    CERCLIS Listing.
    See 0014
PREREMEDIAL ACTION
    Accelerated Response at NPL Sites Guid-
    ance (Superfund Management Review: Rec-
    ommendation No. 22).
    See 0082
    Decentralization of Superfund Bottle Reposi-
    tory Functions.
    See 0985
    Expediting  Remedial Construction.
    See 1127
    Superfund  Analytical Review and Oversight.
    See 0995
PREREMEDIAL ACTIONS
    Feasibility Study: Detailed Analysis of Reme-
    dial Action  Alternatives.
    See 1088
                                                                                                                          SU-65

-------
PRESCORE COMPUTER MODEL
                                                      SUBJECT INDEX
    Gujda  for  Conducting Treatability  Studies
    Jiflder  CERCLA:	Aerobic  Btodegradation
    Rbmody Screening!	
    SCO 1156
    Guide  for  Conducting Treatability  Studies
    Wider  ' CERpLA:	Aerpbjc  BIpdegradation
    Romody Screening! Interim Guidance.
    See 1157
PRESCORE COMPUTER MODEL
    Prtllmtnary   Ranking   Evaluation   Score
    (PREscore) Version 2.0  (for Microcomput-
    ers),
    S4W0373
    PREscor* Software: Users Manual and Tuto-
    rial Version 2.0.
    S«wb375
PRESCORE PROGRAM
    Preliminary   Ranking   Evaluation   Score
    (PREscore) Version 1.1  (for Microcomput-
    ers).
    S0S0372
PRINCE WILLIAM SOUND
    Exxon Vaktez OM Spill. A Report to  the
    President
    5000928
PRKJRITY ASSESSMENT MODEL,
    Continuous  Release-Emergency Response
    Notification System and Priority Assessment
    Model; Model Documentation.
    Sea 1143
    Continuous  Release-Emergency Response
    Notification System and Priority Assessment
    Modal; User's Manual for EPA Regions.
    8001144
PROFILE (ILLINOIS)
    Suporfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Clean-
    up  Efforts Nationwide,  Fall 1993  (Johns-
    Manville Site Profile, Illinois).
    See 0352 	
PROGRAM MANAGEMENT
    CERCLIS - WasteLAN - CleanLAN.
    Sao 0015
    Compendium of Good Ideas: Models of Suc-
    cess and Lessons Learned. Volume 1. High-
    lights.
    §f»a0133	
    '	Compendium of Good Ideas: Models of Suc-
    csss  and  Lessons Learned.  Volume 2.
    '"'Source Book.
    Sea 0134
    Suportund Program  and Information Man-
    Jiigamont Update. Volume 1, Number 1, No-
    vember 1993.
    Soa 0123
    Superfund Strategic Plan  and  Implementa-
    tion Strategy Fiscal Year 1994.
    See 0126
    Suparfund Strategic Plan  and  Implementa-
    tion Strategy  Fiscal Year  1994: Office  and
    ;; Division Plans.
    SM 0127
 PROGRESS
    < Suporfund: Environmental Progress.
    Sea 0976
 PROJECT MANAGEMENT
    Administrative Guidance for the FIT to ARCS
    (FIT/ARCS) Transition.
    See 0017
    Approval of Long Term Contracting Strategy
    for  Superfund   (Superfund   Management
    Review: Recommendation E.2).
    Sea 0018
    , ARAR's Q's and A's. Compliance with the
    i	Tpxfcity Characteristics Rule. Part 1.
    See 0396
    ARARs Q's and A's.
    Soo 0398
ARARS Q's and A's: Compliance with Fed-
eral Water Quality Criteria.
See 0399
Audits and the Superfund Program Manager.
See 0086
Audits and the Superfund Program Manager.
See 0087
CERCLA  Compliance  with  Other  Laws
Manual: CERCLA Compliance with State Re-
quirements.
See 0405
CERCLA  Compliance  with  Other  Laws
Manual: CERCLA Compliance with the CWA
and SDWA.
See 0406
CERCLA  Compliance  with  Other  Laws
Manual: Guide to Manual.
See 0407
CERCLA  Compliance  with  Other  Laws
Manual:  Overview of ARARs - Focus  on
ARAR Waivers.
See 0408
CERCLA  Compliance  with  Other  Laws
Manual:  RCRA  ARARS-Focus  on Closure
Requirements.
See 0410
CERCLA  Compliance  with  Other  Laws
Manual: Summary and Part 2. CAA,  TSCA,
and Other Statutes.
See 0411
CERCLIS  Data  Handling Support  Policy
Statement.
See 0013
Compendium  of Federal  Financial  Assist-
ance  Programs:  Targeting  Programs  for
State and Local  Ground-Water Protection.
See 1435
Getting Ready: Scoping the RI/FS.
See 1092
Guidance on EPA Oversight of Remedial De-
signs and Remedial Actions Performed by
Potentially Responsible Parties.
See 1128
Guidelines for Effective Management of the
Contract Laboratory Program.
See 0027
Highlights: Superfund Program Management.
Fiscal Year 1993.
See 0095
Implementation  of the Superfund Alternative
Remedial   Contracting  Strategy  (ARCS):
Report of the  Administrator's Task  Force.
Implementation  Plan.
See 0032
Interim RCRA/CERCLA Guidance on Non-
Contiguous Sites and On-Site Management
on Waste and Treatment Residue.
See 0427
Long-Term  Contracting Strategy for  Super-
fund.
See 0042
 Mandatory  Community  Relations Training.
Superfund Management Review Implementa-
tion Product (Recommendation: No. 43.P(i)).
See 0103
 Model Performance Standards for Superfund
 Project Officers, Deputy Project Officers, and
 Work Assignment Managers/Delivery Order
 Officers.
 See 0045
 OSWER  Comparative  Risk  Project.  Execu-
 tive Summary and Overview.
 See 1062
 OSWER  Integrated Health and Safety Policy.
 See 0920
 Planning for Sufficient Community Relations
 (Superfund Management Review:  No. 43A).
 See 0108
 Revised  Hazard Ranking System: Evaluating
 Sites After Waste Removals.
 See 0379
   RI/FS Improvements Follow-Up.
   See 1109
   Superfund: Environmental Progress.
   See 0976
   Superfund Policy Forum Update, Volume 1,
   Number 1, February 1992.
   See 0324
   Superfund Program  Management Manual,
   Fiscal Year 1994.
   See 0073
   Superfund Program: Ten Years of Progress.
   See 0977
   Superfund Progress - Aficionado's Version
   (Progress as of March 31,1992).
   See 0326
   Superfund Progress, Spring 1992.
   See 0329
   USAGE Preplaced and Rapid  Response
   Contracts.
   See 1139
PROJECT PLANNING
   Status of State Involvement in the Superfund
   Program, FY 80 to FY 89.
   See 0114
PROPERTY OWNERS
   Policy Towards Owners  of Residential Prop-
   erty at Superfund Sites.
   See 0587
PROTECTION
   Superfund Progress - Aficionado's Version:
   Progress as of June 30,1992.
   See 0325
   Superfund Progress, Summer 1992.
   See 0330
PROTECTIVE CLOTHING
   Limited-Use Chemical Protective Clothing for
   EPA Superfund Activities.
   See 1058
    Estimation of the Cost of Using Chemical
    Protective Clothing.
   See 1244
PROTECTIVE EQUIPMENT
    Evaluation of Personal  Cooling Devices for
    Dioxin Clean-Up Operation.
    See 1248
PUBLIC EDUCATION
    Communicating with the Public About Haz-
    ardous Materials:  An Examination of Local
    Practice. Risk Communication Series.
    See 0464
PUBLIC HEALTH
    Air/Superfund National  Technical Guidance
    Study Series: Estimation of Air Impacts for
    Air Stripping of Contaminated Water.
    See 1382
    Ecological Risk   Assessment  Methods: A
    Review and Evaluation  of Past Practices in
    the Superfund and RCRA (Resource Conser-
    vation and Recovery Act) Programs  (Execu-
    tive Summary Included).
    See 1024
    Guidance for Coordinating  ATSDR  Health
    Assessment  Activities  with the Superfund
    Remedial Process.
    See 1029
    Guidance for Data Useability in Risk Assess-
    ment.
    See 1030
    Guidance for Data Useability in Risk Assess-
    ment. Interim Report.
    See 1032
    Guidance for Data Useability in Risk Assess-
    ment (Part A).
    See 1033
 SU-66

-------
                                                       SUBJECT INDEX
                                                                                                                     REAL ESTATE
    Guidance for Data Useability in Risk Assess-
    ment (Part B).
    See 1034
    Guidance on  Remedial  Actions for  Super-
    fund Sites with PCB Contamination.
    See 1261
    Health and Safety Roles and Responsibilities
    at Remedial Sites.
    See 0918
    Health    Effects   Assessment   Summary
    Tables.
    See 1051
    Health    Effects   Assessment   Summary
    Tables.
    See 1052
    Health    Effects   Assessment   Summary
    Tables.
    See 1053
    Health Effects Assessment Summary Tables
    Fourth Quarter FY 1989.
    See 1054
    Interim  Guidance on  Establishing Soil Lead
    Cleanup Levels at Superfund Sites. Supple-
    ment to  Interim Guidance on  Establishing
    Soil  Lead  Cleanup  Levels  at Superfund
    Sites.
    See 1516
    Recent Advances in Risk Reduction  Engi-
    neering.
    See 1064
    Risk Assessment Guidance for Superfund.
    Volume 1. Human Health Evaluation Manual.
    Part A, April 1990.
    See 1066
    Risk Assessment Guidance for Superfund.
    Volume 1. Human Health Evaluation Manual
    (Part B).
    See 1067
    Risk Assessment Guidance for Superfund.
    Volume 1. Human Health Evaluation Manual
    (Part B, Development of Risk-Based Prelimi-
    nary Remediation Goals).
    See 1068
    Risk Assessment Guidance for Superfund.
    Volume 1. Human Health Evaluation Manual
    (Part C).
    See 1069
    Risk  Assessment Guidance for Superfund.
    Volume 1. Human Health Evaluation Manual
    (Part C, Risk Evaluation of Remedial Alterna-
    tives).
    See, 1070
    Risk Assessment Guidance for Superfund.
    Volume 1. Human Health Evaluation Manual.
    Supplemental  Guidance: 'Standard Default
    Exposure Factors'.
    See 1071
    Role of  Health Research  in  Support  of
    EPA's Regulatory Programs.
    See 1074
    Standard Operating Safety Guides.
    See 0925
    Summary  of Ecological Risks,  Assessment
    Methods,  and  Risk Management Decisions
    in Superfund and RCRA  (Resource Conser-
    vation and Recovery Act).
    See 1077
    Superfund Fact Sheet: Exposure Pathways.
    See 0393
    Toxicological         Profile          for
    Benzo(b)Fluoranthene.
    See 1360
PUBLIC INFORMATION
    Superfund Emergency Response Actions: A
    Summary  of  Federally-Funded  Removals.
    Sixth Annual Report, Fiscal Year 1991.
    See 0315
PUBLICLY OWNED TREATMENT WORKS
    CERCLA  Site   Discharges  to  POTWS
    CERCLA Site Sampling Program: Detailed
    Data Report.
    See 1575
    CERCLA Site Discharges to POTWS Treat-
    ability Manual.
    See 1577
    Discharge  of Wastewater  from  CERCLA
    Sites into POTWS.
    See 0421
    Overview of Selected  EPA  (Environmental
    Protection  Agency) Regulations and Guid-
    ance  Affecting   POTW  (Publicly  Owned
    Treatment Works) Management.
    See 0432
PUERTO RICO
    National Priorities List Sites: Massachusetts.
    See 0209
    National Priorities List Sites: Puerto Rico.
    See 0259
    National Priorities List Sites: Puerto Rico.
    See 0260
    National Priorities List Sites: Puerto Rico and
    Virgin Islands, 1992.
    See 0261
    Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
    PRP Listing by Site for Puerto Rico.
    See 0735
    Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
    PRP Listing by Site for Puerto Rico.
    See 0737
PYRETRON BURNERS
    SITE Demonstration of the  American Com-
    bustion Pyretron Oxygen-Enhanced Burner.
    See 1299
PYROLYSIS
    Engineering Bulletin: Pyrolysis Treatment.
    See 1234
QUALITY ASSURANCE
    Quality and Environmental Protection: The
    EPA QA Program.
    See 0990
    Quality Assurance/Quality Control Guidance
    for Removal  Activities: Sampling QA/QC
    Plan and Data Validation Procedures.
    See 0993
    Rationale for  the Assessment of Errors in
    the Sampling of Soils.
    See 1526
QUALITY CONTROL
    Quality Assurance/Quality Control Guidance
    for Removal  Activities: Sampling QA/QC
    Plan and Data Validation Procedures.
    See 0993
    Regional Quality Control Guidance for NPL
    Candidate Sites.
    See 0376
QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS
    Metals Testing Report: Metal Content of En-
    vironmental Samples from Region 4.
    See 1282
RADIOACTIVE CONTAMINATION
    Environmental Characteristics of EPA, NRG,
    and DOE Sites Contaminated with Radioac-
    tive Substances.
    See 1237
RADIOACTIVE ISOTOPES
    Characterization of Contaminated Soil from
    the Montclair/Glen Ridge, New Jersey,  Su-
    perfund Sites.
    See 1493
RADIOACTIVE MATERIALS
    Babcock and Wilcox Cyclone Furnace Vitrifi-
    cation. Technology Demonstration Summary.
    See 1203
    Guidance for Data Useability in Risk Assess-
    ment (Part B).
    See 1034
    Removal  of Radionuclides by Electrokinetic
    Soil Processing.
    See 1531
    Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Clean-
    up Efforts Nationwide, Spring 1993 (Radium
    Chemical Site Profile, Queens, New York).
    See 0959
RADIOACTIVE WASTE DISPOSAL
    Characterization   Protocol  for  Radioactive
    Contaminated Soils.
    See 1494
RADIOACTIVE WASTE MANAGEMENT
    Implementation Plan for the Record of Deci-
    sion for Disposal  of Hanford  Defense High-
    Level, Transuranic, and Tank Wastes.
    See 1266
    Meeting Summary: National Advisory Council
    on  Environmental Policy  and  Technology
    (1st).  Subcommittee  on  Radiation Cleanup
    Regulation. Held in Washington, DC. on Oc-
    tober 18-19, 1993.
    See 1059
RADIOACTIVE WASTES
    Assessment of Technologies  for the  Reme-
    diation of  Radioactively  Contaminated Su-
    perfund Sites.
    See 1198
    Computer Models Used to Support Cleanup
    Decision-Making at Hazardous and Radioac-
    tive Waste Sites.
    See 1218
    Environmental Characteristics of EPA, NRC,
    and DOE Sites Contaminated with Radioac-
    tive Substances.
    See 1237
    Harmonization of  QA Procedures for Envi-
    ronmental Data Operations: Development of
    a National Consensus Standard for Quality
    Assurance for Environmental Programs.
    See 0989
    Health   Effects  Assessment   Summary
    Tables.
    See 1051
    Health   Effects  Assessment   Summary
    Tables.
    See 1052
    Health   Effects  Assessment   Summary
    Tables.
    See 1053
    Health Effects Assessment Summary Tables
    Fourth Quarter FY 1989.
    See 1054
    Issues  Paper on Radiation  Site  Cleanup
    Regulations.
    See 1280
    Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Clean-
    up Efforts Nationwide,  Fall  1992.  (Lans-
    downe Radioactive Residence Site Profile).
    See 0946
RANKING
    Regional Quality Control  Guidance for NPL
    Candidate Sites.
    See 0376
    Revised  Hazard  Ranking  System (HRS):
    Final Rule.
    See 0380
REAL ESTATE
    Real   Estate  Acquisition  Procedures for
    USAGE Projects.
    See 1133
                                                                                                                           SU-67

-------

REAL-TIME AIR MONITORS
          SUBJECT INDEX
REAL-TIME AIR MONITORS
    Alr/Suporfund National Technical Guidance
    Study Series: Compilation of Information on
    Real-Time Air Monitoring for Use at Super-
    fund Sites.
   JSM1377      ,'„;,   ,  ":	
REAL TIME OPERATIONS	'"  '	'
   tffarjiewprk, for' Real-Tlme  Decision-Making:
  "-"New  Bedford  HaSpr Hot Dredging Study.
    Sue 1587
REAUTHORIZATION ISSUES
    Suporfund Policy Forum Update, Volume 1,
    Number 1, February 1992.
    See 0324
RECORD OF DECISION
    Compendium of ROD Language for FY 1993
   ;„ Focus Aieas,  	I'"  '„",	
    $M JQ&3.	
    Evaluation  of, and Additional Guidance on,
    Issuance of Unilateral Administrative Orders
    (JJAOa) for RD/RA.
    See 0538
    Gutdo to Developing Superfund No Action,
   '	Ipejfm  Action,, and  Contingency  Remedy
   TROOs.
    Sao 1098
    Model Administrative Order on  Consent for
    Removal Actions.
    Sea 0574
    ROD Annual Report, FY 1989.
    See 1111
    ROD Annual Report, FY1991. Volume 2.
    See 1114
    BOO Annual Report, FY 1992.
    Soo 1115
    Waiver  of Headquarters Approval for  Issu-
    ance of RD/RA Special Notice Letters at the
    Thne of ROD Signature from  OERR  and
    OWE.
    See 0893
RECORDS MANAGEMENT
    Superfund Information Repositories and Ad-
 i   mlnislrative Records: Introduction for Librar-
    ians.    "'    '	   	'"
   ;,§§«, 0497
REggRDS Op,DECISION ^"n^
   ;"§uggested'	 ROD	Language  for  Various
    Ground Water Remediation Options.
    See 1476
RECOVERY
    Guide for  Conducting  Treatability Studies
    under CERCLA: Soil Vapor Extraction.  Inter-
    im Guidance.
    See 1163
REFUSE DISPOSAL
    Redetegatlon of Civil Judicial Settlement Au-
    thorities under Delegation  14-13-B and 14-
    14-E
    See 0593
    .Revision of CERCLA Civil Judicial Settje-
   ' merit Authorities under Delegations 14-13-B
    and 14-14-E.
    See 0602
    Waiver  of Concurrence on  De Minimis Gen-
    erator Settlements.
   	See 0892
REGION 1  ,"       '.'.	"I    .    '	'  .
   : Site Enforcement Tracking System  (SETS)
    (Region 1) (for Microcomputers).
    See 0850      	       	
REGION 10
   = Sjle Enforcement Trackjng System  (SETS)
    (Region 10) (for Microcomputers).
    See 0868
REGION 2
   iSfte Enforcement Tracking System  (SETS)
    (Region 2) (lor Microcomputers).
    See 0852
REGION 3
    Site Enforcement Tracking System  (SETS)
    (Region 3) (for Microcomputers).
    See 0854
REGION 4
    Site Enforcement Tracking System  (SETS)
    (Region 4) (for Microcomputers).
    See 0856
REGION 5
    Site Enforcement Tracking System  (SETS)
    (Region 5) (for Microcomputers).
    See 0858
REGION 6
    Site Enforcement Tracking System  (SETS)
    (Region 6) (for Microcomputers).
    See 0860
REGION 7
    Site Enforcement Tracking System  (SETS)
    (Region 7) (for Microcomputers).
    See 0862
REGION 8
    Site Enforcement Tracking System  (SETS)
    (Region 8) (for Microcomputers).
    See 0864
REGION 9
    Site Enforcement Tracking System  (SETS)
    (Region 9) (for Microcomputers).
    See 0866
REGIONAL ANALYSIS
    Site Enforcement Tracking System  (SETS)
    (National).
    See 0611
    Site Enforcement Tracking System  (SETS)
    (National) (for Microcomputers).
    See 0613
REGIONAL DECISION TEAM
    SACM Regional Decision Teams:  Interim
    Guidance. Volume 1, Number 5, December
    1992.
    See 0111
REGIONAL PLANNING
    ARCS (Alternative Remedial Contract Strate-
    gy) Contracts Users'Manual.
    See 0019
REGULATIONS
    Accelerated  Response at NPL Sites Guid-
    ance (Superfund Management Review: Rec-
    ommendation No. 22).
    See 0082
    Analysis  of  Treatability Data for Soil and
    Debris: Evaluation of Land Ban Impact  on
    Use of Superfund Treatment Technologies.
    See 1488
    CERCLA Off-Site Policy - Eligibility of Facili-
    ties in Assessment Monitoring.
    See 0414
    CERCLA Off-Site Policy: Providing Notice to
    Facilities.
    See 0415
    CERCLIS Data Handling  Support  Policy
    Statement.
    See 0013
    Decentralization of Superfund Bottle  Reposi-
    tory Functions.
    See 0985
    Discharge of  Wastewater  from CERCLA
    Sites into POTWS.
    See 0421
    Facility Response Plans.
    See 0929
    Guidance on Oversight of PRP Performed
    RD/RA.
    See 1130
    Index  to the Monthly Hotline Report Ques-
    tions (June 1982 to December 1991).
    See 0139
    Inside the  Hotline: A Compilation of 1991
    Monthly Hotline Reports.
    See 0140
    Inside the  Hotline: A Compilation of 1992
    Monthly Hotline Reports.
    See 0141
    Involvement of Superfund Program Manag-
    ers  in  Superfund  Response  Agreement
    Audits.
    See 0099
    Model Performance Standards for Superfund
    Project Officers, Deputy Project Officers, and
    Work Assignment Managers/Delivery  Order
    Officers.
    See 0045
    OSWER  Integrated Health and Safety Policy.
    See 0920
    Planning for Sufficient Community Relations
    (Superfund Management  Review: No. 43A).
    See 0108
    Revised Interim Final Guidance on Indian In-
    volvement in the Superfund Program.
    See 0484
    Superfund Analytical Review and Oversight.
    See 0995
    Use of Office of Research and Develop-
    ment's Bioremediation Expertise in  Super-
    fund Removal Program.
    See 1016
REIMBURSEMENTS
    EPA/USACE Payment Process:  Direct Cite/
    Revised Reimbursement Methods.
    See 1126
REMEDIAL ACTION
    Accessing Federal Data Bases for Contami-
    nated  Site  Clean-Up Technologies (Second
    Edition).
    See 1189
    Accessing the $50 Million Set-Aside in the
    Remedial Action Budget for Quick Response
    at National Priorities List Sites.
    See 1082
    Additional Guidance on  'Worst Sites' and
    'NPL Caliber Sites' to Assist in SACM Imple-
    mentation.
    See 0083
    Administrative  Order on Consent for Reme-
    dial Investigations/Feasibility Study.
    See 0510
    Advancing  the Use  of Treatment Technol-
    ogies for Superfund Remedies.
    See 1191
    Air/Superfund  National Technical Guidance
    Study Series. Air Stripper  Design Manual.
    See 1374
    Air/Superfund  National Technical Guidance
    Study  Series:  Applicability of  Open Path
    Monitors for Superfund.
    See 1375
    Air/Superfund  National Technical Guidance
    Study  Series.  Comparisons of  Air Stripper
    Simulations and Field Performance Data.
    See 1376
    Air/Superfund  National Technical Guidance
    Study Series. Development of Example Pro-
    cedures  for Evaluating the Air Impacts  of
    Soil Excavation Associated with Superfund
    Remedial Actions.
    See 1380
    Air/Superfund  National Technical Guidance
    Study  Series.  Emission Factors for Super-
    fund Remediation Technologies.
    See 1381
    Air/Superfund  National Technical Guidance
    Study  Series:  Estimation  of Air  Impacts for
    Air Stripping of Contaminated Water.
    See 1382
SU-68

-------
                                                     SUBJECT INDEX
                                                                                                               REMEDIAL ACTION
 Air/Superfund National Technical  Guidance
 Study Series: Estimation  of Air Impacts for
 Soil Vapor Extraction (SVE) Systems.
 See 1383
 Air Superfund National Technical  Guidance
 Study Series. Estimation  of Air Impacts for
 the Excavation of Contaminated Soil.
 See 1384
 Air/Superfund National Technical  Guidance
 Study Series. Guideline for Predictive Base-
 line Emissions Estimation  Procedures for Su-
 perfund Sites.
 See 1387
 Air Superfund National Technical  Guidance
 Study Series. Screening Procedures for Esti-
 mating the Air Impacts of Incineration at Su-
 perfund Sites.
 See 1389
 Alternative Biological  Treatment Processes
 for Remediation of Creosote-and PGP-Con-
 taminated Materials: Bench-Scale  Treatabil-
 ity Studies.
 See 1418
 American Combustion Pyretron Destruction
 System. Applications Analysis Report.
 See 1193
 Analysis of State Superfund Programs:  50-
 State Study, 1990 Update.
 See 0448
 Analysis of Treatability Data for  Soil and
 Debris: Evaluation of  Land Ban Impact on
 Use of Superfund Treatment Technologies.
 See 1488
 ARAR's Q's  and A's. Compliance with the
 Toxiclty Characteristics Rule. Part 1.
 See 0396
 ARARs Q's and A's.
 See 0398
 ARCS Construction  Contract  Modification
 Procedures.
 See 0020
 Assessing Sites  under SACM: Interim Guid-
 ance.  Volume  1,  Number 4, Deccember
 1992.
 See 0084
 Assessment  of  International  Technologies
 for  Superfund  Applications:  Technology
 Review and Trip Report Results. •
 See  1197
 Basic Concepts of Contaminant Sorption at
 Hazardous  Waste  Sites  (Ground  Water
 Issue).
 See 1431
 Bioremediation: An  Information Update  on
 Applying Bioremediation to Site Cleanup.
 See 1421
 Bioremediation in the Field. An Information
 Update on  Applying Bioremediation to Site
 Clean-Up. Number 3.
 See 1422
 Bioremediation in the Field: An Information
 Update on  Applying Bioremediation to Site
 Cleanup. (Number 4).
 See 1423
 Bioremediation in the Field: Number  1, No-
 vember 1990.
 See 1424
 CERCLA  Compliance  with   Other   Laws
 Manual: Overview of ARARs  - Focus  on
 ARAR Waivers.
 See 0408
 CERCLA   Compliance  with   Other   Laws
 Manual. Part 1. Interim Final.
 See 0409
 CERCLA Compliance with  the RCRA Toxici-
ty Characteristics (TC) Rule: Part 2.
See 0412
CERCLA Off-Site Policy - Eligibility of Facili-
ties in Assessment Monitoring.
See 0414
 CERCLA Off-Site Policy: Providing Notice to
 Facilities.
 See 0415
 CERCLA Waste Capacity Assurance.
 See 0131
 Characterizing soils for hazardous waste site
 assessments.
 See 1495
 Chemical Enhancements to Pump-and-Treat
 Remediation. Ground Water Issue.
 See 1434
 Chemical Oxidation Treatment.  Engineering
 Bulletin.
 See 1211
 Commencement  Bay   Nearshore/Tideflats
 Feasibility Study.  Development of  Sediment
 Cleanup Goals.
 See 1578
 Commencement  Bay   Nearshore/Tideflats
 Feasibility Study. Executive Summary.
 See 1579
 Commencement  Bay   Nearshore/Tideflats
 Feasibility Study. Volume 1.
 See 1580
 Commencement  Bay  Nearshore/Tideflats
 Feasibility Study. Volume 2. Appendices.
 See 1581
 Comparative Analysis of Remedies Selected
 in the Superfund Program during FY 87, FY
 88 and FY 89.
 See 0519
 Compendium  of  CERCLA  ARARs  fact
 sheets and directives.
 See 0417
 Compendium of ROD Language for FY 1993
 Focus Areas.
 See 1083
 Compliance with Third Third  Requirements
 Under the LDRs. Superfund LDR Guide No.
 8.
 See 0418
 Considerations  in  Ground-Water  Remedi-
 ation  at Superfund Sites and RCRA Facili-
 ties: Update.
 See 1437
 Control of Air Emissions from Materials Han-
 dling during Remediation. Engineering Bulle-
 tin.
 See 1398
 Control Technologies for Defunct lead Bat-
 tery Recycling Sites:  Overview and Recent
 Developments. Volume 3.
 See 1220
 Data  Quality  Objectives for Remedial  Re-
 sponse Activities: Development Process. Ex-
 ample Scenario: RI/FS Activities at a Site
 with Contaminated Soils and Ground Water.
 See 0980
 Demonstration of a Trial Excavation at the
 McColl Superfund Site.
 See 1226
 Demonstration of Waste Treatment Technol-
 ogies.
 See 1229
 Development  of Electro-Acoustic Soil  De-
 contamination (ESD) Process for In situ Ap-
 plications.
See 1498
 Developments in  Chemical  Treatment  of
Contaminated Soil.
See 1499
 Discharge of  Wastewater  from CERCLA
Sites into POTWS.
See 0421
Early  Action and  Long-Term Action under
SACM: Interim Guidance, Volume 1, Number
2, December 1992.
See 0089
ECO  Update. Volume 1, Number  3. The
Role of Natural Resource  Trustees in  the
Superfund Process.
See 1021
 ECO Update. Volume 1, Number 4. Develop-
 ing a Work Scope  for Ecological  Assess-
 ments.
 See 1022
 Emergency  Responders  Agreements  for
 Fund-Lead Remedial Actions.
 See 1001
 Enforcement  under  SACM:  Interim  Guid-
 ance. Volume 1, Number 3, December 1992.
 See 0090
 Engineering Bulletin: Pyrolysis Treatment.
 See 1234
 EPA/Navy CERCLA  Remedial Action  Tech-
 nology Guide.
 See 1241
 Evaluation of Alternative Treatment Technol-
 ogies for CERCLA Soils and Debris (Summa-
 ry of Phase 1 and Phase 2).
 See 1504
 Evaluation of, and Additional  Guidance on,
 Issuance of Unilateral Administrative Orders
 (UAOs) for RD/RA.
 See 0538
 Evaluation of  Cleanup  Levels for Remedial
 Action at CERCLA (Comprehensive  Environ-
 mental Response, Compensation and  Liabil-
 ity  Act) Sites  Based on a Review of EPA
 (Environmental Protection Agency) Records
 of Decision.
 See 1245
 Evaluation of Ground-Water Extraction Rem-
 edies: Phase 2. Volume 1. Summary Report.
 See 1444
 Evaluation of Ground-Water Extraction Rem-
 edies: Phase 2. Volume 2. Case Studies and
 Updates.
 See 1445
 Exemptions from the Statutory Limits on Re-
 moval Actions.
 See 1002
 Expediting Remedial Construction.
 See 1127
 Feasibility Study: Detailed Analysis of Reme-
 dial Action Alternatives.
 See 1088
 Feasibility Study: Development and  Screen-
 ing of Remedial Action Alternatives.
 See 1089
 Final  Guidance on  Implementation of the
 'Consistency'  Exemption  to  the Statutory
 Limits on Removal Actions.
 See 1004
 Final Policy on Setting RI/FS Priorities.
 See 1090
 Funding of State  Enforcement Related Ac-
 tivities.
 See 0474
 Getting Ready: Scoping the RI/FS.
 See 1092
 Granular Activated Carbon  Treatment.  Engi-
 neering Bulletin.
 See 1258
 Ground-Water Issue: Soil sampling and anal-
 ysis for volatile organic compounds.
 See 1507
 Guidance on EPA Oversight of Remedial De-
 signs and Remedial Actions Performed by
 Potentially Responsible Parties.
 See 1128
 Guidance  on  Expediting Remedial  Design
 and Remedial Action.
 See 1129
 Guidance on Implementation of the 'Contrib-
 ute  to Remedial Performance' Provision.
 See 1093
 Guidance  on Oversight  of  Potentially  Re-
sponsible Party Remedial Investigations and
 Feasibility Studies. Volume 1.
 See 1094
                                                                                                                          SU-69

-------
REMEDIAL ACTION
       SUBJECT INDEX
   Ihiiili   i    •      C «'1i   in1,,;:!!!!::!,        „  i ',    i '"'
    Guidance on  Oversight of  Potentially  Re-
    sponsible Party Remedial Investigations and
    Feasibility Studies. Volume  2. Appendices.
   ,8691095	
    fiuldance on  Oversight of PRP Performed
    RD/RA.
    Sea 1130
    Guide  for Conducting Treatability  Studies
    under CERCLA.
    See 1154
    Guide  for Conducting Treatability  Studies
   "uodof CERCLA.
    Sea 1155
    Guide  for Conducting Treatability  Studies
    under CERCLA: Soil Washing. Interim Guid-
    anot.
    See 1165
    Guide  for Conducting Treatability  Studies
    under CERCLA: Sofl Washing: Quick Refer-
   ""ence Fact Sheet.	
    S«a1166
    GuWa  for Conducting Treatability  Studies
    under   CERCLA;   Thefmal   Desorption
    Remedy Selection. Interim Guidance.
    Soa 1170
    Guide  on Remedial Actions at Superfund
    Sites with PCS Contamination.
    Sea 1282
    Guide to Selecting Superfund Remedial Ac-
    tions,
    Sea 1100
    HSEO SACM  Report. Volume 1. Number 1,
    January 1993.
    See 0096
    Hydraulic Fracturing Technology: Technolo-
    gy Evaluation Report and  Application Analy-
    sis Report.
   	See 1265,
    Implementation of  the Decentralized Con-
    tractor  Performance Evaluation  and Award
    Fee Process for Selected Remedial Program
    Contracts.
    See 0031
    in-sflu   Btoremediatton  of  Contaminated
    Ground Water.
    See 1465	
    Sh-sfcj   Stabilization/Solidification  of  PCS
    (Potychlorinated    Biphenyls)-Contaminated
    Sod.
   	See 1556	
    In situ Treatment of Contaminated Ground
   , Water:  An Inventory of Research and Reid
    Demonstrations and Strategies for Improving
    Ground Water Remediation Technologies.
    See 1466
    Innovative Technology: Slurry-Phase Biode-
   - gradation.'
    See 1271
    Innovative Treatment  Technologies:  Over-
    view and Guide to Information Sources.
    See 1272
    Innovative Treatment  Technologies:  Semi-
    Annual Status Report (Fourth Edition).
    Sea 1273
   I Innovative Treatment  Technologies:  Semi-
    Annual Status Report. (Third Edition).
    See 1275
   Jf)tertm GuWanc¥on Potentially Responsible
   " "Party Participation1 in Remedial Investigations
    and Feasibility Studies.
    See 0561
    Interim RCRA/CERCLA  Guidance on  Non-
   11; Contiguous Sites and  On-Slte Management
    on Waste and Treatment Residue.
    See 0427
    International Evaluation of In-situ Biorestora-
    tion  of Contaminated Soil and Groundwater
   ! (September 1990)-Translation.
    See 1517
    inventory  of  Treatability  Study  Vendors.
    Volume 1.
    Soa 1171


 SU-70
Involvement  of Superfund Program Manag-
ers  in  Superfund  Response  Agreement
Audits.
See 0099
Issuance of Administrative Orders for  Imme-
diate Removal Actions.
See 0567
Liability of Corporate Shareholders and Suc-
cessor Corporations  for Abandoned  Sites
Under  the  Comprehensive  Environmental
Response, Compensation and Liability Act.
See 0570
Literature  Review Summary of Metals Ex-
traction  Processes Used to Remove Lead
from Soils.
See 1518
Literature Survey of Innovative Technologies
for Hazardous  Waste  Site  Remediation,
1987-1991.
See 1281
Making  Superfund Documents Available to
the Public throughout the Cleanup Process,
and Discussing Site  Findings and Decisions
as They are Developed (Superfund Manage-
ment Review: No. 43 G, H, Q, R, T).
See 0100
Measurement  of Volatile  Organic   Com-
pounds during Start-Up of Bioremediation of
French  Limited Superfund  Site in Crosby
Texas  Using Wind  Dependent  Whole-Air
Sampling.
See  1414
Model Administrative Order on Consent for
Removal Actions.
See 0574
Model  Statement of Work  for a Remedial
Investigation and Feasibility Study Conduct-
ed by Potentially Responsible Parties.
See 0578
Municipal Settlements.
See  0583
Obtaining a Soil and Debris Treatability Vari-
ance for Removal Actions. Superfund LDR
Guide No. 6B.
See  0430
Options for  Developing and Evaluating Miti-
gation  Strategies for Indoor Air Impacts at
CERCLA   Sites.  Air/Superfund  National
Technical  Guidance Study Series,  Report
ASF-36.
See 1415
Policy  for  Superfund  Compliance with the
RCRA Land Disposal Restrictions.
See 0436
Potential for Joint Research between EPA
and the U.S. Army.
See 1293
Quality Assurance/Quality Control Guidance
for  Removal Activities: Sampling  QA/QC
Plan and Data Validation Procedures.
See 0993
Reductive Dehalogenation of  Organic Con-
taminants  in  Soils  and  Ground  Water.
Ground Water Issue.
See 1527
Remedial  Action, Treatment, and Disposal of
Hazardous  Waste.   Proceedings  of  the
Annual  Hazardous Waste Research Sympo-
sium (17th). Held in  Cincinnati, Ohio on April
9-11,1991.
See 1135
Remedial Investigation: Site Characterization
and Treatability Studies.
See 1106
Asymmetric Loss Function for Superfund Re-
mediation Decisions.
See 1200
Bench-Scale Evaluation of Alternative  Bio-
logical Treatment Processes for the Remedi-
ation of Pentachiorophenol- and Creosote-
Contaminated Materials: Slurry-Phase Biore-
mediation.
See 1419
Bench-Scale Evaluation of Alternative  Bio-
logical Treatment Processes for the Remedi-
ation of Pentachiorophenol- and Creosote-
Contaminated Materials: Solid-Phase Biore-
mediation.
See 1420
Chemical Stabilization of Mixed Organic and
Metal Compounds. EPA SITE Program Dem-
onstration of the Silicate Technology Corpo-
ration Process.
See 1212
Cost  Estimating  Systems for  Remedial
Action Projects.
See 1123
Engineering Bulletins: Aids to  the  Develop-
ment of Remedial Alternatives.
See 1236
EPA SITE Demonstration of the International
Waste Technologies/Geo-Con  In situ Stabili-
zation/Solidification Process.
See 1553
EPA Site Demonstration of the Terra Vac In
situ Vacuum  Extraction Process in Grove-
land, Massachusetts. (Site  Program Update:
Part VII).
See 1243
Extraction and  Recovery of Lead  Species
from Soil.
See 1506
Factors Affecting the Applicability of Plasma
Systems to the  Cleanup of Superfund Sites.
See 1250
Incineration Treatment of  Arsenic-Contami-
nated Soil.
See 1268
Management Systems Review of the Super-
fund RI/FS: Opportunities  for Streamlining.
See  1101
PAST:  The Potential ARARs Selection Tool.
See 0434
Results from  the Stabilization Technologies
Evaluated by the Site Program. New  Eng-
land Environmental Expo 90.
See  1558
SITE Demonstration of the CHEMFIX Solidi-
fication/Stabilization Process at the Portable
Equipment Salvage Company Site.
See 1559
Solidification/Stabilization:  Is It Always Ap-
propriate.
See 1560
Sorption,  Important  in Stabilized/Solidified
Waste Forms.
See 1563
U.S. EPA SITE Demonstration  of AWD Tech-
nologies' AquaDetox/SVE System.
See 1363
Use of Electrokinetics for Hazardous Waste
Site Remediation.
See 1366
Revised Interim Final Guidance on Indian In-
volvement in the Superfund Program.
See 0484
 ROD Annual Report, FY 1989.
See 1111
 ROD Annual Report, FY 1992.
See1115
 SACM  Regional  Decision Teams:  Interim
 Guidance. Volume 1, Number 5, December
 1992.
 See 0111

-------
                                                     SUBJECT INDEX
                                                                                                                REMEDIAL ACTION
 Scoper's  Notes: An RI/FS Costing Guide.
 Bringing in  a Quality RI/FS  on Time  and
 Within Budget.
 See 1117
 Sector Sampling for VOC's during  Remedi-
 ation of Superfund Site at Shaver's  Farm,
 Georgia.
 See 1417
 Selection of Control Technologies for Reme-
 diation of Lead Battery Recycling Sites. (En-
 gineering Bulletin).
 See 1298
 SITE Emerging Technologies Project: Bab-
 cock and Wilcox Cyclone Vitrification.
 See 1303
 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
 Frequency by Party Name Report.
 See 0607
 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
 Frequency by Party Name Report.
 See 0608
 Site Enforcement Tracking  System (SETS)
 (National).
 See 0611
 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
 National Alphabetical Report by PRP Name,
 September 26, 1991.
 See 0612
 Site Enforcement Tracking  System (SETS)
 (National) (for Microcomputers).
 See 0613
 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
 National Frequency by PRP Name Report.
 See 0614
 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
 National PRP Listing Alphabetically by PRP
 Name.
 See 0615
 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
 National  PRP Listing Alphabetically by PRP
 Name.
 See 0616
 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
 National PRP Listing by Site.
 See 0617
 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
 National PRP Listing by Site.
 See 0618
 Site Enforcement Tracking  System (SETS)
 (National - 3 1/2 Inch Diskette,  IBM  PS/2
 Compatible) (for Microcomputers).
 See 0620
 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
 PRP Listing by Site for Alabama.
 See 0621
 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
 PRP Listing by Site for Alabama.
 See 0622
 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
 PRP Listing  by Site for American  Samoa.
 See 0624
 Site Enforcement Tracking System  (SETS):
 PRP Listing  by Site for American  Samoa.
 See 0625
 Site Enforcement Tracking System  (SETS):
 PRP Listing by Site for Arizona.
 See 0627
 Site Enforcement Tracking System  (SETS):
 PRP Listing by Site for Arizona.
 See 0628
 Site Enforcement  Tracking System  (SETS):
 PRP Listing by Site for Arkansas.
 See 0630
 Site Enforcement Tracking System  (SETS):
 PRP Listing by Site for Arkansas.
See 0631
Site Enforcement Tracking System  (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for California.
See 0633
Site Enforcement Tracking System  (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for California.
See 0634
 Site Enforcement Tracking  System (SETS):
 PRP Listing by Site for Colorado.
 See 0636
 Site Enforcement Tracking  System (SETS):
 PRP Listing by Site for Colorado.
 See 0637
 Site Enforcement Tracking  System (SETS):
 PRP Listing by Site for Connecticut.
 See 0639
 Site Enforcement Tracking  System (SETS):
 PRP Listing by Site for Connecticut.
 See 0640
 Site Enforcement Tracking  System (SETS):
 PRP Listing by Site for Delaware.
 See 0642
 Site Enforcement Tracking  System (SETS):
 PRP Listing by Site for Delaware.
 See 0643
 Site Enforcement Tracking  System (SETS):
 PRP Listing by Site for Florida.
 See 0645
 Site Enforcement Tracking  System (SETS):
 PRP Listing by Site for Florida.
 See 0646
 Site Enforcement Tracking  System (SETS):
 PRP Listing by Site for Georgia.
 See 0648
 Site Enforcement Tracking  System (SETS):
 PRP Listing by Site for Georgia.
 See 0649
 Site Enforcement Tracking  System (SETS):
 PRP Listing by Site for Idaho.
 See 0651
 Site Enforcement Tracking  System (SETS):
 PRP Listing by Site for Idaho.
 See 0652
 Site Enforcement Tracking  System (SETS):
 PRP Listing by Site for Illinois.
 See 0654
 Site Enforcement Tracking  System (SETS):
 PRP Listing by Site for Illinois.
 See 0655
 Site Enforcement Tracking  System (SETS):
 PRP Listing by Site for Indiana.
 See 0657
 Site Enforcement Tracking  System (SETS):
 PRP Listing by Site for Indiana.
 See 0658
 Site Enforcement Tracking  System (SETS):
 PRP Listing by Site for Iowa.
 See 0660
 Site Enforcement Tracking  System  (SETS):
 PRP Listing by Site for Iowa.
 See 0661
 Site Enforcement Tracking  System  (SETS):
 PRP Listing by Site for Kansas.
 See 0663
 Site Enforcement Tracking  System  (SETS):
 PRP Listing by Site for Kansas.
 See 0664
 Site Enforcement Tracking  System  (SETS):
 PRP Listing by Site for Kentucky.
 See 0666
 Site Enforcement Tracking  System  (SETS):
 PRP Listing by Site for Kentucky.
 See 0667
 Site Enforcement Tracking System  (SETS):
 PRP Listing by Site for Louisiana.
 See 0669
 Site Enforcement Tracking System  (SETS):
 PRP Listing by Site for Louisiana.
 See 0670
 Site Enforcement Tracking System  (SETS):
 PRP Listing by Site for Maine.
See 0672
Site Enforcement Tracking System  (SETS):
 PRP Listing by Site for Maine.
See 0673
Site Enforcement Tracking System  (SETS):
 PRP Listing by Site for Maryland.
See 0675
 Site Enforcement Tracking  System (SETS):
 PRP Listing by Site for Maryland.
 See 0676
 Site Enforcement Tracking  System (SETS):
 PRP Listing by Site for Massachusetts.
 See 0678
 Site Enforcement Tracking  System (SETS):
 PRP Listing by Site for Massachusetts.
 See 0679
 Site Enforcement Tracking  System (SETS):
 PRP Listing by Site for Michigan.
 See 0681
 Site Enforcement Tracking  System (SETS):
 PRP Listing by Site for Michigan.
 See 0682
 Site Enforcement Tracking  System (SETS):
 PRP Listing by Site for Minnesota.
 See 0684
 Site Enforcement Tracking  System (SETS):
 PRP Listing by Site for Minnesota.
 See 0685
 Site Enforcement Tracking  System (SETS):
 PRP Listing by Site for Mississippi.
 See 0687
 Site Enforcement Tracking  System (SETS):
 PRP Listing by Site for Mississippi.
 See 0688
 Site Enforcement Tracking  System (SETS):
 PRP Listing by Site for Missouri.
 See 0690
 Site Enforcement Tracking  System (SETS):
 PRP Listing by Site for Missouri.
 See 0691
 Site Enforcement Tracking  System (SETS):
 PRP Listing by Site for Montana.
 See 0693
 Site Enforcement Tracking  System (SETS):
 PRP Listing by Site for Montana.
 See 0694
 Site Enforcement Tracking  System (SETS):
 PRP Listing by Site for Nebraska.
 See 0696
 Site Enforcement Tracking  System (SETS):
 PRP Listing by Site for Nebraska.
 See 0697
 Site Enforcement Tracking  System (SETS):
 PRP Listing by Site for Nevada.
 See 0699
 Site Enforcement Tracking  System (SETS):
 PRP Listing by Site for Nevada.
 See 0700
 Site Enforcement Tracking  System (SETS):
 PRP Listing by Site for New Hampshire.
 See 0702
 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
 PRP Listing by Site for New Hampshire.
 See 0703
 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
 PRP Listing by Site for New Jersey.
 See 0705
 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
 PRP Listing by Site for New Jersey.
See 0706
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
 PRP Listing by Site for New Mexico.
See 0708
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
 PRP Listing by Site for New Mexico.
See 0709
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
 PRP Listing by Site for New York.
See 0711
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for New York.
See 0712
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for North Carolina.
See 0714
                                                                                                                           SU-71

-------
REMEDIAL ACTION
       SUBJECT INDEX
    SJta Enforcement Tracking  System (SETS):
    PRP LfstJng by Site for North Carolina.
    Soe0715
    Site Enforcement Tracking  System (SETS):
    PRP Listing by Site for North Dakota.
    Sea 0717
    Site Enforcement Tracking  System (SETS):
    PRP Listing by Site for North Dakota.
  |, Se« Q718	
  I Site Enforcement "Tracing'System (SETS):
  !  PRP Listing by Site for Northern Marianas.
    Sea 0720
    Site Enforcement Tracking  System (SETS):
  1  PRP Listing by Site for Northern Marianas.
    Soe0721
    Site Enforcement Tracking  System (SETS):
    PRP Listing by Site for Ohto.
    See 0723
  ".Slta Enfo|pe,rnent Irackjrig  System (SETS):
  ""  PRP Listing'by'SJtefofOhto.
    Sea 0724
    Site Enforcement Tracking  System (SETS):
    PRP Listing by Site for Oklahoma.
    Sea 0726
    Sfta Enforcement Tracking  System (SETS):
    PRP Listing by Site for Oklahoma.
    Sea 0727
  i  SHa Enforcement Tracking  System (SETS):
    PRP Usting by Site for Oregon.
    See 0729
    Site Enforcement Tracking  System (SETS):
    PRP Usting by SHe for Oregon.
    See 0730
    Site Enforcement Tracking  System (SETS):
    PRP Usflng by Site for Pennsylvania.
    See 0732
    Site Enforcement Tracking  System (SETS):
    PRP Listing by Site for Pennsylvania.
    Sea 0733
    Sjte Enforcement Tracking  System (SETS):
    PRP Listing by Site for Puerto Rico.
    Sea 0735
    Site Enforcement Tracking  System (SETS):
    PflP Listing by Site for Puerto Rico.
    See 0736
    Stta Enforcement Tracking  System (SETS):
    PRP Listing by Site for Region 1.
    See 0739
    Site Enforcement Tracking  System (SETS):
    PRP Listing by Site for Region 1. Volume 1.
    Sea 0742
    Site Enforcement Tracking  System (SETS):
    PRP Usting by Site for Region 2.
    Sea 0744
    SWa Enforcement Tracking  System (SETS):
    PRP Usjing by Site for Region 2. Volume 2.
    8680747,
  1  Site Enforcement Tracking  System (SETS):
    PRP Listing by Site for Region 3. Volume 3.
    Sea 0751
    Site Enforcement Tracking  System (SETS):
    PRP Usting by Stte for Region 4.
  |j" Sea OJSIJ	
    Site Enforcement tracking  System (SETS):
    PRP Usting by Stte for Region 4. Volume 4.
    Sea 075$
    Slta Enforcement Tracking  System (SETS):
    PRP Usting by Site for Region 5.
    Sea 0758
    Slta Enforcement Tracking  System (SETS):
  	PRP Listing by Site for Region 5. Volume 5.
    See 0761
    Site Enforcement Trackjpg  System (SETS):
  .IPR:i?"UsUng"by"slte for Region 6.
    Sea 0763
  " Sita Enforcement Tracking  System (SETS):
    PRP Usting by Site for Region 6. Volume 6.
    See 0766
    Site Enforcement Tracking  System (SETS):
    PRP Listing by Site for Region 7.
    See 0768


SO-72
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 7. Volume 7.
See 0771
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Usting by Site for Region 8.
See 0773
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 8. Volume 8.
See 0776
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 9.
See 0778
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Usting by Site for Region 9. Volume 9.
See 0781
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 10.
See 0783
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Usting by Site for Region 10. Volume
10.
See 0786
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Usting by Site for Rhode Island.
See 0787
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Rhode Island.
See 0788
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Usting by Site for South Carolina.
See 0790
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Usting by Site for South Carolina.
See 0791
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for South Dakota.
See 0793
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for South Dakota.
See 0794
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Usting by Site for Tennessee.
See 0796
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Usting by Site for Tennessee.
See 0797
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Texas.
See 0799
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Usting by Site for Texas.
See 0800
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Trust Territories.
See 0802
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Usting by Site for Trust Territories.
See 0803
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Usting by Site for Utah.
See 0805
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Utah.
See 0806
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Usting by Site for Vermont.
See 0808
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Usting by Site for Vermont.
See 0809
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Virginia.
See 0811
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Usting by Site for Washington.
See 0813
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Usting by Site for Washington.
See 0814
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Usting by Site for West Virginia.
See 0816
Site Enforcement Tracking  System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for West Virginia.
See 0817
Site Enforcement Tracking  System (SETS):
PRP Usting by Site for Wisconsin.
See 0819
Site Enforcement Tracking  System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Wisconsin.
See 0820
Site Enforcement Tracking  System (SETS):
PRP Usting by Site for Wyoming.
See 0822
Site Enforcement Tracking  System (SETS):
PRP Usting by Site for Wyoming.
See 0823
Site Enforcement Tracking  System (SETS):
PRP National Usting Alphabetically by Party
Name.
See 0826
Site Enforcement Tracking  System (SETS):
PRP National Usting Alphabetically by Party
Name.
See 0827
Site Enforcement Tracking  System (SETS):
PRP National Usting Alphabetically by Party
Name.
See 0829
Site Enforcement Tracking  System (SETS):
PRP National Listing by Site.
See 0832
Site Enforcement Tracking  System (SETS):
PRP National Usting by Site.
See 0833
Site Enforcement Tracking  System (SETS):
PRP National Listing by Site.
See 0835
Site Enforcement Tracking  System (SETS):
PRP Site Usting by Site for Virginia.
See 0848
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)
(Region 1-31/2  Inch Diskette IBM PS/2
Compatible) (for Microcomputers).
See 0849
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)
(Region 1) (for Microcomputers).
See 0850
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)
(Region 2-31/2  Inch Diskette IBM PS/2
Compatible) (for Microcomputers).
See 0851
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)
(Region 2) (for Microcomputers).
See 0852
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)
(Region 3-31/2  inch Diskette IBM PS/2
Compatible) (for Microcomputers).
See 0853
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)
(Region 3) (for Microcomputers).
See 0854
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)
(Region 4-31/2  Inch Diskette IBM PS/2
Compatible) (for Microcomputers).
See 0855
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)
(Region 4) (for Microcomputers).
See 0856
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)
(Region 5-31/2  Inch Diskette IBM PS/2
Compatible) (for Microcomputers).
See 0857
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)
(Region 5) (for Microcomputers).
See 0858
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)
(Region 6-3 1/2  Inch Diskette IBM PS/2
Compatible) (for Microcomputers).
See 0859

-------
                                                    SUBJECT INDEX
                                                                                                              REMEDIAL ACTION
 Site Enforcement Tracking  System (SETS)
 (Region 6) (for Microcomputers).
 See 0860
 Site Enforcement Tracking  System (SETS)
 (Region 7-31/2 Inch Diskette IBM  PS/2
 Compatible) (for Microcomputers).
 See 0861
 Site Enforcement Tracking  System (SETS)
 (Region 7) (for Microcomputers).
 See 0862
 Site Enforcement Tracking  System (SETS)
 (Region 8-31/2 Inch Diskette IBM  PS/2
 Compatible) (for Microcomputers).
 See 0863
 Site Enforcement Tracking  System (SETS)
 (Region 8) (for Microcomputers).
 See 0864
 Site Enforcement Tracking  System (SETS)
 (Region 9-3 1/2 Inch Diskette IBM  PS/2
 Compatible) (for Microcomputers).
 See 0865
 Site Enforcement Tracking  System (SETS)
 (Region 9) (for Microcomputers).
 See 0866
 Site Enforcement Tracking  System (SETS)
 (Region 10 - 3 1/2 Inch Diskette IBM  PS/2
 Compatible) (for Microcomputers).
 See 0867
 Site Enforcement Tracking  System (SETS)
 (Region 10) (for Microcomputers).
 See 0868
 Solidification/Stabilization  of Organics  and
 Inorganics.
 See 1561
 Soliditech,  Inc.   Solidification/Stabilization
 Process: Applications Analysis Report.
 See 1562
 Some Major Factors Important in Establish-
 ing Land Use Policy for Remediated Super-
 fund Sites.
 See 0308
 Status of Key SACM Program Management
 Issues: Interim Guidance, Volume 1, Number
 1, December 1992.
 See 0113
 Streamlining the RI/FS for CERCLA Munici-
 pal Landfill Sites.
 See 1118
 Streamlining the RI/FS for CERCLA Munici-
 pal Landfill Sites.
 See 1119
 Suggested  ROD   Language  for  Various
 Ground Water Remediation Options.
 See 1475
 Superfund  Accelerated  Cleanup  Bulletin:
 Presumptive Remedies for Municipal Landfill
 Sites. Volume 2, Number 1,  February 1993.
 See 0115
 Superfund  Accelerated  Cleanup  Bulletin:
 Presumptive Remedies for Wood Treatment
 Facilities. Volume  1, Number 2, May 1992.
 See 0116
 Superfund  Accelerated  Cleanup  Bulletin.
Volume  1,  Number  3. Presumptive Reme-
 dies.
 See 0118
 Superfund  Accelerated   Cleanup   Model
 (SACM): Questions and Answers.
See 0121
Superfund  Accelerated   Cleanup   Model
(SACM). Volume   1, Number 4,  November
 1992.
See 0122
Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Clean-
up Efforts Nationwide, Fall 1992. (American
Thermostat Corporation, New York).
See 0942
Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Clean-
up Efforts Nationwide, Fall 1992. (Ciba-Geigy
Corporation, Mclntosh, Alabama).
See 0944
 Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Clean-
 up Efforts Nationwide, Fall 1992. (Krysowaty
 Farm, Hillsborough, New Jersey).
 See 0945
 Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Clean-
 up Efforts Nationwide, Fall 1992. (Valley of
 the Drums, Bullitt County, Kentucky).
 See 0947
 Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Clean-
 up  Efforts  Nationwide,  Fall  1992.  (Wide
 Beach Section of Brant, New York).
 See 0948
 Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Clean-
 up Efforts Nationwide, Spring  1993 (French
 Limited  Site Profile, Harris County, Texas).
 See 0954
 Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Clean-
 up Efforts Nationwide, Spring 1993 (Old Mid-
 land Products Site Profile,  Yell County, Ar-
 kansas).
 See  0957
 Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Clean-
 up Efforts Nationwide, Spring 1993 (Radium
 Chemical  Site Profile, Queens, New York).
 See  0959
 Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Clean-
 up Efforts Nationwide, Spring  1993 (United
 Chrome Products Site Profile).
 See  0961
 Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Clean-
 up Efforts Nationwide,  Summer 1993 (Tri-
 State Plating Site Profile,  Columbus, Indi-
 ana).
 See  0970
 Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste  Clean-
 up Efforts Nationwide, Winter 1993. (Wells G
 and  H Site, Woburn, Massachusetts).
 See  0972
 Superfund Emergency Response Actions: A
 Summary  of Federally-Funded  Removals.
 Fifth Annual  Report - Fiscal Year 1990.
 See  0313
 Superfund Emergency Response Actions: A
 Summary  of Federally-Funded  Removals.
 Sixth Annual Report, Fiscal Year 1991.
 See  0315
 Superfund Emergency Response Actions: A
 Summary  of Federally  Funded  Removals.
 Volume 3.
 See  0318
 Superfund Engineering Issue: Issues Affect-
 ing the Applicability and Success of Remedi-
 al/Removal Incineration Projects.
 See  1308
 Superfund: Focusing on the Nation at Large.
 A  Decade of Progress at National  Priorities
 List Sites.
 See  0322
 Superfund Innovative Technology Evaluation
 Program:  Progress and  Accomplishments,
 Fiscal Year  1989. A  Third  Report to Con-
 gress.
 See  1311
 Superfund Innovative Technology Evaluation
 Program: Progress and  Accomplishments,
 Fiscal Year 1990.  A Fourth Report to Con-
 gress.
 See  1312
Superfund Innovative Technology Evaluation
 Program:  Progress and Accomplishments
 Fiscal Year 1991. A 5th Report to Congress.
See  1313
Superfund Innovative Technology Evaluation
 Program: Technology  Profiles,  Fifth Edition.
See  1315
Superfund Innovative Technology Evaluation
Program: Technology Profiles,  Fourth Edi-
tion.
See  1316
  Superfund Innovative Technology Evaluation
  Program:  Technology  Profiles,  November
  1989.
  See 1317
  Superfund LDR Guide  No.  1: Overview of
  RCRA Land Disposal Restrictions (LDRs).
  See 0440
  Superfund LDR Guide No. 2: Complying with
  the  California  List  Restrictions under Land
  Disposal Restrictions (LDRs).
  See 0441
  Superfund LDR Guide No. 4: Complying with
  the  Hammer  Restrictions under Land  Dis-
  posal Restrictions (LDRs).
  See 0443
  Superfund LDR Guide No. 6A (2nd  Edition)
  Obtaining a Soil and Debris Treatability Vari-
  ance for Remedial Actions.
  See 0445
  Superfund Remedial Action  Decision Proc-
  ess: Database for Selected FY87 Records of
  Decision.
  See 1136
  Superfund  Removal  Procedures:   Action
  Memorandum Guidance.
  See 1012
  Superfund:  Report  of the EPA Superfund
  Revitalization Public Meeting Held on June
  24, 1992. Volumes 1 and 2.
  See 0333
  Superfund Technical Assistance Grants.
  See 0502
  Superfund  Technical   Assistance  Grants
  (Fact Sheet).
  See 0503
  Superfund  Technical   Assistance  Grants
  (TAGs) (Pamphlet).
  See 0505
  Synopses of Federal Demonstrations of In-
  novative Site Remediation Technologies.
  See 1324
  Tech Trends Number 3, December 1990.
  See 1325
  Tech Trends Number 4, March 1991.   .
  See 1326
  Tech Trends Number 5, May  1991.
  See 1327
  Tech Trends Number 9, June 1992.
  See 1329
  Tech Trends (Number 10).
  See 1330
  Tech Trends (Number 11).
'  See 1331
  Tech Trends:  The Applied Technologies
  Journal for Superfund Removals and Reme-
  dial Actions and RCRA Corrective Actions,
  December 1993.
  See 1332
  Tech Trends:  The Applied  Technologies
  Journal for Superfund Removals and Reme-
  dial Actions and RCRA Corrective Actions.
  May 1993.
  See 1333
 Technical Guidance Document: Construction
  Quality  Management for  Remedial  Action
  and  Remedial  Design Waste  Containment
  Systems.
  See 1334
 Technology Demonstration  Summary:  Bio
 Trol Soil Washing System for Treatment of a
 Wood Preserving Site.
 See 1538
 Technology    Demonstration    Summary,
  DuPont/Oberlin Microfiltration System, Pal-
  merton, Pennsylvania. April-May 1992.
 See 1336
                                                                                                                         SU-73

-------
REMEDIAL ACTION COST ESTIMATING SYSTEM     SUBJECT INDEX
   'technology  Evaluation  Report  SITE Pro-
    gram Demonstration of the DuPont/Oberlin
   ; Mksrofiltratfon Technology.
    Soo1350
    Technology Evaluation Report Site Program
   ^Demonstration ,,Test Accu}ech , Pneumatic
    Fracturing Extraction arid Hot Gas injection,
    Phase 1. Volume 1.
   iSea'1352
    Ten* Vac In situ Vacuum Extraction System:
    Applications Analysis Report
    See 1355
    Toxic  Treatments Mn-situ1   Steam/Hot-Air
    Stripping Technology. Applications Analysis
    Roport.
    Sea 1545
    Toxloologlcal  Implementations of Remediat-
    ing Hazardous Wastes.
    See 1359
    Ultrox Intornational Ultraviolet  Radiation/Oxi-
    dation  technology:  Applications Analysis
    Report.
    See 1364
    USAGE  Proplacod  and  Rapid  Response
    Contracts.
    See 1139
    Use of Office  of Research  and Develop-
    ment's Btofemedtetion  Expertise in  Super-
    rood Removal Program.
    See 1016
    Use of Removal Approaches to Speed Up
    Remeotai Action Projects.
    See 1140
    Vendor Information  System  for Innovative
    Treatment Technologies (VISITT). Number 1.
    See 1370
REMEDIAL ACTION COST ESTIMATING
SYflEM
   'Cost  Estimating  Systems   for  Remedial
    Action Projects.
    See 1123
REMEDIAL ACTIONS
    CERCtA Site Discharges to  POTWs: Guid-
    ance Manual.
    s«> 1676  ;    ;;.;;.   .';;;;
    Suporfund Emergency Response Actions: A
    Summary of  Federally-Funded  Removals.
    Volume 1.
    See 0316
    Suporfund Emergency Response Actions: A
    Summary of  Federally-Funded  Removals.
    See 0317 ..................
REMEDIAL DESIGNS
   [Guidance pri  Expediting  Remedial  Design
    and Remedial Action.
    See 1129
    Guidance on Oversight of PRP Performed
    RD/RA.
    See 1130
    Technical Guidance Document Construction
    Quality Management for Remedial Action
    and Remedial Design Waste Containment
    Systems.
    See 1334
REMEDIAL INVESTIGATIONS
    RI/FS Improvements Follow-Up.
    See 1109 .........................
REMEDIAL PROJECT MANAGERS
   • Characterizing  soils for hazardous waste site
    assessments.
   ..... Sea 1495
REMEDIAL RESPONSE
    Snalysfs  of State Superfund  Programs: 50-
    Stat» Study. 1990 Update.
    See 0448
    ARARs Q's and A's.
    See 0393
   ARCS (Alternative Remedial Contract Strate-
   gy) Contracts Users' Manual.
   See 0019
   CERCLA  Compliance  with  Other  Laws
   Manual. Part 1. Interim Final.
   See Q409
   Community Relations  in Superfund: A Hand-
   book.
   See 0467
   Data  Quality Objectives  for Remedial Re-
   sponse Activities: Development Process. Ex-
   ample Scenario:  RI/FS  Activities at a Site
   with Contaminated Soils and Ground Water.
   See 0980
   Guide to Delisting of  RCRA Wastes  for Su-
   perfund  Remedial Responses.
   See 0422
   Handbook: Responding  to  Discharges  of
   Sinking Hazardous Substances.
   See 1589
   Political  Subdivision  Involvement in  Super-
   fund.
   See 0479
   Role  of  Community Interviews in the Devel-
   opment  of a Community  Relations Program
   for Remedial Response.
   See 0485
   Summary of Treatment  Technology Effec-
   tiveness for Contaminated Soil.
   See 1533
   Superfund Emergency Response Actions: A
   Summary of Federally-Funded Removals.
   Fifth Annual Report - Fiscal Year 1990.
   See 0313
   Superfund Emergency Response Actions: A
   Summary of Federally  Funded Removals.
   Fourth Annual Report -  Fiscal Year 1989.
   See 0314
   Superfund  LDR Guide No.  5: Determining
   When Land Disposal Restrictions (LDRs) Are
   'Applicable' to CERCLA  Response Actions.
   See 0444
   Superfund   Removal  Procedures:   Action
   Memorandum Guidance.
   See 1012
REMEDIATION
   Air/Superfund National Technical Guidance
   Study Series: Estimation of Air Impacts from
   Area  Sources of Particulate Matter Emis-
   sions at Superfund Sites.
   See 1385
   Control  of Air  Emissions  from Superfund
   Sites.
   See 1400
   EPA Engineering Issue: Technology Alterna-
   tives  for the Remediation of PCB-Contami-
   nated Soil and Sediment.
   See 1501
   Estimation of Air Impacts for Bioventlng Sys-
   tems  Used  at Superfund Sites. Air/Super-
   fund  National Technical Guidance  Study
   Series.
   See 1407
   Estimation of Air Impacts  for  Solidification
   and Stabilization  Processes Used at Super-
   fund Sites. Air/Superfund National Technical
   Guidance Study Series.
   See 1408
   Estimation of Air Impacts for Thermal De-
   sorption Units Used at Superfund Sites. Air/
   Superfund   National  Technical  Guidance
   Study Series.
   See 1409
   Guidance on Conducting Non-Time-Critical
   Removal Actions under CERCLA.
   See 1005
   Health and Safety Plan (HASP) User's Guide
   (Version 3.0/4.0).
   See 0917
    Presumptive Remedy for CERCLA Municipal
    Landfill Sites.
    See 1105
REMEDIATION GOALS
    Risk Assessment Guidance for Superfund.
    Volume 1. Human Health Evaluation Manual
    (Part B).
    See 1067
REMOTE SENSING
    Use of a Fourier Transform Spectrometer as
    a Remote Sensor at Superfund Sites.
    See 1365
REMOVAL
    Consideration of ARARs during Removal Ac-
    tions.
    See 0419
    Removal Program Representative Sampling
    Guidance. Volume 1. Soil.
    See 1010
    Revised Hazard Ranking System: Evaluating
    Sites After Waste Removals.
    See 0379
    Superfund Emergency Response Actions: A
    Summary of  Federally-Funded  Removals.
    Volume 1.
    See 0316
    Superfund Emergency Response Actions: A
    Summary of  Federally-Funded  Removals.
    Volume 2.
    See 0317
    Superfund   Removal  Procedures:   Action
    Memorandum Guidance.
    See 1012
    Superfund  Removal  Procedures: Guidance
    on the Consideration of ARARS during  Re-
    moval Actions.
    See 1013
    Superfund Removal Procedures: Public Par-
    ticipation Guidance for On-Scene Coordina-
    tors; Community Relations and the Adminis-
    trative Record.
    See 1014
    Superfund  Removal Procedures:  Removal
    Enforcement Guidance for On-Scene Coordi-
    nators.
    See 1015
REPA CONTRACTS
    Roles  and  Responsibilities  of  Regional
    Project Officers, Zone Project Officers, Work
    Assignment Managers and Contracting Offi-
    cers for  the RCRA Enforcement, Permitting
    and Assistance Contracts (REPA).
    See 0070
REPORTING REQUIREMENTS
    Assessing Reports of Continuous Releases
    of Hazardous Substances: A Guide  for EPA
    Regions.
    See 1142
    Questions and Answers on Release  Notifica-
    tion Requirements and Reportable  Quantity
    Adjustments.
    See 1149
    Reporting Requirements for Continuous  Re-
    leases of Hazardous Substances: A Guide
    for Facilities and Vessels on Compliance.
    See 1150
REPOSITORIES
    Superfund Information Repositories  and Ad-
    ministrative Records: Introduction for Librar-
    ians.
    See 0497
REPRESENTATIVE SAMPLING
    Removal Program Representative Sampling
    Guidance. Volume 1. Soil.
    See1010
SU-74

-------
                                                       SUBJECT  INDEX     RISK REDUCTION ENGINEERING LABORATORY
RESEARCH
    Potential for Joint Research between EPA
    and the U.S. Army.
    See 1293
RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT
    Remedial Action, Treatment, and Disposal of
    Hazardous  Waste.  Proceedings  of  the
    Annual Hazardous Waste Research Sympo-
    sium (17th). Held in Cincinnati, Ohio on April
    9-11,1991.
    See 1135
RESEARCH MANAGEMENT
    Bibliography of Federal Reports and Publica-
    tions Describing Alternative and Innovative
    Treatment   Technologies   for  Corrective
    Action and Site Remediation.
    See 1206
RESEARCH PROJECTS
    Abstracts of Phase 1 and Phase 2 Awards:
    Small Business  Innovation  Research Pro-
    gram 1991.
    See 0016
    EPA/ORD    (Environmental    Protection
    Agency/Office of  Research  and Develop-
    ment) Role and Perspective in Sediment Re-
    search.
    See 1585
    Operations and Research at the  U.S. EPA
    Incineration   Research   Facility:   Annual
    Report for FY89.
    See 1482
    Operations and Research at the  U.S. EPA
    Incineration   Research   Facility:   Annual
    Report for FY92.
    See 1485
    OSWER  Comparative Risk  Project. Execu-
    tive Summary and Overview.
    See 1062
RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS
    Homeowners  Exempted  from  Superfund
    Cleanup Costs: National Policy Overview.
    See 0426
    Policy Towards Owners of Residential Prop-
    erty at Superfund Sites.
    See 0587
RESOURCE CONSERVATION AND
RECOVERY ACT
    CERCLA  Compliance  with  Other  Laws
    Manual:  RCRA ARARS-Focus  on Closure
    Requirements.
    See 0410
    Guidance for Environmental Priorities Initia-
    tive (EPI) Facilities in the Superfund Pre-Re-
    medial Program.
    See 0341
    Tech Trends (Number 11).
    See 1331
REVIEWS
    Superfund Program: Ten Years  of Progress.
    See 0977
REVISIONS
    Superfund Guide to RCRA Management Re-
    quirements for Mineral  Processing Wastes.
    See 0439
RHODE ISLAND
    National  Priorities List Sites: Rhode Island.
    See 0262
    National  Priorities List Sites: Rhode Island.
    See 0263
    National  Priorities List Sites: Rhode Island,
    1992.
    See 0264
    Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
    PRP Listing by Site for Rhode Island.
    See 0737
    Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
    PRP Listing by Site for Rhode Island.
    See 0788
    Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
    PRP Listing by Site for Rhode Island.
    See 0789
RISK
    Achieving  Greater  Consistency  between
    Subjective and Objective Risks.
    See 1017
    Communicating with the Public About Haz-
    ardous  Materials: An Examination  of Local
    Practice. Risk Communication Series.
    See 0464
    Nature and Extent of Ecological Risks at Su-
    perfund Sites and RCRA (Resource Conser-
    vation and Recovery Act) Facilities (Execu-
    tive Summary Included).
    See 1060
    SARA (Superfund  Amendments and  Reau-
    thorization Act) Section 313 Roadmaps Data
    Base. User's Manual. Version 2.10.
    See 0304
RISK ASSESSMENT
    Additional Guidance  on 'Worst Sites' and
    'NPL Caliber Sites' to Assist in SACM Imple-
    mentation.
    See 0083
    Air/Superfund  National  Technical Guidance
    Series.  Superfund Air Pathway Analyses
    Review Criteria Checklists.
    See 1372
    Air/Superfund  National  Technical Guidance
    Study  Series.  Volume  1. Overview  of  Air
    Pathway Assessments for Superfund Sites
    (Revised).
    See 1391
    ATSDR   Health   Consultations    under
    CERCLA.
    See 1018
    AutoMOUSE:  An  Improvement  to  the
    MOUSE Computerized Uncertainty Analysis
    System Operational Manual.
    See 1201
    Criteria for Choosing Indicator  Species  for
    Ecological Risk Assessments at Superfund
    Sites (90-6402).
    See 1224
    Determination  of  Imminent and Substantial
    Endangerment for Removal Actions.
    See 1000
    Endangerment Assessment Handbook.
    See 0530
    Field Standard Operating Procedures  for  Air
    Surveillance F.S.O.P. No. 8.
    See 0910
    Field Standard Operating Procedures for Es-
    tablishing Work Zones (F.S.O.P.  6).
    See 0911
    Field Standard  Operating  Procedures  for
    Preparation of a Site Safety Plan  F.S.O.P.
    No. 9.
    See 0912
    Framework for Real-Time Decision-Making:
    New Bedford  Harbor Pilot Dredging  Study.
    See 1587
    Future Land Use Scenarios  for Federal Fa-
    cilities.
    See 0897
    Guidance for Data Useability in Risk Assess-
    ment.
    See 1030
    Guidance for Data Useability in Risk Assess-
    ment Interim Report.
    See 1032
    Guidance for Data Useability in Risk Assess-
    ment (Part A).
    See 1033
    Guidance for Data Useability in Risk Assess-
    ment (Part B).
    See 1034
    Guidance on  Conducting Non-Time-Critical
    Removal Actions under CERCLA.
    See 1005
    Integrating Removal and Remedial Site As-
    sessment Investigations.
    See 0939
    Issues  Paper on  Radiation Site  Cleanup
    Regulations.
    See 1280
    Methodology for  Evaluating  Potential Car-
    cinogenicity in Support of Reportable Quanti-
    ty Adjustments Pursuant to CERCLA Section
    102.
    See 1146
    New Policy on Performance of Risk Assess-
    ments during Remedial Investigation Feasi-
    bility Studies (RI/FS) Conducted by  Poten-
    tially Responsible Parties (PRPs).
    See 1061
    OSWER Comparative Risk  Project. Execu-
    tive Summary and Overview.
    See 1062
    Recent Advances  in Risk Reduction Engi-
    neering.
    See 1064
    Risk Assessment Guidance for Superfund.
    Volume 1. Human Health Evaluation Manual.
    Part A.
    See 1065
    Risk Assessment Guidance for Superfund.
    Volume 1. Human Health Evaluation Manual.
    Part A, April 1990.
    See 1066
    Risk Assessment Guidance for Superfund.
    Volume 1. Human Health Evaluation Manual
    (Part C).
    See 1069
    Risk Assessment Guidance for Superfund.
    Volume 1. Human Health Evaluation Manual.
    Supplemental Guidance:  'Standard Default
    Exposure Factors'.
    See 1071
    Risk Assessment Guidance for Superfund.
    Volume 2. Environmental Evaluation Manual.
    See 1072
    Risk Assessment in Superfund: A Primer.
    First Edition, September 1990.
    See 1073
    Role of the  Baseline Risk  Assessment in
    Superfund Remedy Selection Decisions.
    See 1075
    Superfund  Remedial Action  Decision  Proc-
    ess: Database for Selected FY87 Records of
    Decision.
    See 1136
    Supplemental Guidance on Performing Risk
    Assessments in Remedial Investigation/Fea-
    sibility  Studies (RI/FSs). Conducted by Po-
    tentially Responsible Parties (PRPs).
    See 1078
    Supplemental Guide to Video on Superfund
    Site Assessment Screening: A  National Pri-
    ority.
    See 0394
    Use of IRIS Values in Superfund  Risk As-
    sessment.
    See 1081
RISK ASSESSMENT GUIDANCE FOR
SUPERFUND
    Supplemental Guidance to RAGS:  Calculat-
    ing  the Concentration  Term.  Volume  1,
    Number 1, May 1992.
    See 1079
RISK REDUCTION ENGINEERING
LABORATORY
    Risk Reduction  Engineering  Laboratory Site
    Remediation  Technical  Support  Program:
    FY92 Annual Report.
    See 1296
                                                                                                                            SU-75

-------
ROBOTICS
          SUBJECT INDEX
ROBOTICS
    Personnel  Protection  through  Reconnais-
    sance  Robotics  at  Superfund  Remedial
    Sites.
    S««1286
ROBOTS   '       ........... "
    HeM AppticatJons  of  Robotic  Systems in
    Hazardous Environments,  p1-29 1993. See
    •ISO PB86-1 76344 and PB92-166743.
   ^Sae, 12,51  , ,   ,,,, ............... .......
ROTATING BIOLOGICAL CONTACTORS
    Rotating Biological Contactors.  Engineering
    Bulletin.
   ,8991297
RUSH TOWNSHIP (PENNSYLVANIA)
   '""Suporfund" at Work: Hazardous Waste Clean-
    up Efforts Nationwide, Summer  1993 (East-
    am Diversified Metals Site Profile, Schuylkill
    County, Pennsylvania),
    see 0966
SACM (SUPERFUND ACCELERATED
CLEANUP MODEL)
    Expectations  for   Full  Implementation  of
    SACM,
    See 0092
    Further Direction on  Implementing the Su-
    perfund Accelerated Cleanup Model (SACM).
    See 0093
    Suporfund   Accelerated  Cleanup   Model
    (SACM): Questions and Answers.
   , ..... See 0121
SAFETY'
    Health  and  Safety Audit Guidelines:  SARA
    Tjtto I. Section 126.
    Sea 0916
   'Health and Safety Roles and Responsibilities
    at Remedial Sites.
    ,,
    Standard Operating Safety Guides.
    Soa0924
    Standard Operating Safety Guides.
    See 0925
SAID (SITE ASSESSMENT INFORMATION
DIRECTORY)
    Site   Assessment  Information  Directory
    (SAID) Region 1 (for Microcomputers). Date
    oT Coverage: October 1991.
    See 0382
   iSlta   Assessment  Information  Directory
    (SAID) Region 2 (for Microcomputers). Date
    o( Coverage: October 1991.
    Sea 0383
   ;,SJt8   Assessment  Information  Directory
    (SAID) Region 3 (for Microcomputers). Date
    of Coverage: October 1991.
    See 0384
    SKe   Assessment  Information  Directory
    (SAID) Region 4 (for Microcomputers). Date
    of Coverage: October 1991.
    See 0385
    Site   Assessment  Information  Directory
   i, (SAID) Region 5 (for Microcomputers). Date
    of Coverage: 1991.
   '•See 0386 .......................................
    Sita   Assessment  Information  Directory
   I $SAID) Region 6 (for Microcomputers). Date
   ..... of Coverage: October 1991.
    See 0387
    Site   Assessment  Information  Directory
    (SAID) Region 7 (for Microcomputers). Date
    of Coverage: October 1991.
    See 0388
    Site   Assessment  Information  Directory
    (SAID) Region 8 (for Microcomputers). Date
    of Coverage: 1991.
    See 0389
    Site   Assessment  Information  Directory
    (SAID) Region 9 (for Microcomputers). Date
    of" Coverage: October 1991.
    See 0390
    Site  Assessment  Information   Directory
    (SAID) Region 10 (for Microcomputers). Date
    of Coverage: October 1991.
    See 0391
SALARY ADMINISTRATION
    EPA/USACE  Payment  Process: Direct Cite/
    Revised Reimbursement Methods.
    See 1126
SAMPLE PREPARATION
    Sampler's Guide to the Contract Laboratory
    Program.
    See 0071
SAMPLING
    Air/Superfund National Technical  Guidance
    Study  Series.  Air  Emissions  from  Area
    Sources:  Estimating  Soil  and  Soil-Gas
    Sample Number Requirements.
    See 1373
    Compendium  of ERT Soil Sampling and Sur-
    face Geophysics Procedures.
    See 0904
    Importance of Quality for Collection of Envi-
    ronmental Samples.  Planning, Implementing,
    and Assessing  Field  Sampling Quality  at
    CERCLA Sites.
    See 0919
    Potential Sources  of Error in Ground-Water
    Sampling at Hazardous Waste Sites. Ground
    Water Issue.
    See 1472
    Rationale for the  Assessment of  Errors in
    the Sampling  of Soils.
    See 1526
    Asymmetric Loss Function for Superfund Re-
    mediation Decisions.
    See 1200
SAMPLING BOTTLES
    Decentralization of Superfund Bottle Reposi-
    tory Functions.
    See 0985
SBIR (SMALL BUSINESS INNOVATIVE
RESEARCH)
    Abstracts of Phase 1 and Phase 2 Awards:
    Small  Business Innovation  Research  Pro-
    gram 1991.
    See 0016
SCHUYLKILL COUNTY (PENNSYLVANIA)
    Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Clean-
    up Efforts Nationwide,  Summer 1993 (East-
    ern Diversified Metals  Site Profile,  Schuylkill
    County, Pennsylvania).
    See 0966
SCRUBBERS
    Engineered Biofilter for  Removing Organic
    Contaminants in Air.
    See 1403
    Potential  Surrogate  Metals  for Incinerator
    Trial Burns.
    See 1486
    Site Emerging Technologies: Bioscrubber for
    Removing  Hazardous  Organic  Emissions
    from Soil, Water  and Air Decontamination
    Processes.
    See 1302
SEDIMENT TRANSPORT
    Evaluation of  Unsaturated/Valdose  Zone
    Models for Superfund Sites.
    See 1449
    Identification  and  Compilation of Unsaturat-
    ed/Vadose Zone Models.
    See 1464
SEDIMENT-WATER INTERFACES
    EPA/ORD   (Environmental    Protection
    Agency/Office of Research  and  Develop-
    ment) Role and Perspective in Sediment Re-
    search.
    See 1585
SEDIMENTS
    Commencement  Bay  Nearshore/Tideflats
    Feasibility Study. Development of Sediment
    Cleanup Goals.
    See 1578
    Commencement  Bay  Nearshore/Tideflats
    Feasibility Study. Executive Summary.
    See 1579
    Commencement  Bay  Nearshore/Tideflats
    Feasibility Study. Volume 1.
    See 1580
    Commencement  Bay  Nearshore/Tideflats
    Feasibility Study. Volume 2. Appendices.
    See 1581
    Compendium of  ERT Surface  Water and
    Sediment Sampling Procedures.
    See 0905
    Dealing with Toxic Polluted Sediments in the
    Great Lakes Basin.
    See 1582
    EPA/ORD    (Environmental    Protection
    Agency/Office of Research and Develop-
    ment) Role and Perspective in Sediment Re-
    search.
    See 1585
    Pilot-Scale Incineration of PCB-Contaminat-
    ed Sediments from the New Bedford Harbor
    Hot Spot Superfund Site.
    See 1292
    Pilot-Scale incineration of PCB-Contaminat-
    ed Sediments from the Hot Spot of the New
    Bedford Harbor Superfund Site.
    See 1291
    Technology Evaluation  Report:  SITE Pro-
    gram.   CF  Systems  Organics  Extraction
    System,  New   Bedford,   Massachusetts.
    Volume 1.
    See 1346
    Technology Evaluation  Report:  SITE Pro-
    gram.   CF  Systems  Organics  Extraction
    System,  New   Bedford,   Massachusetts.
    Volume 2.
    See 1347
SELENASTRUM CAPRICORNUTUM
    Use  of  'Selenastrum   capricornutum'   to
    Assess the Toxicity Potential of Surface and
    Ground  Water  Contamination  Caused  by
    Chromium Waste.
    See 1367
SEMOUR (INDIANA)
    Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Clean-
    up  Efforts Nationwide,  Winter  1994 (Sey-
    mour Recycling Site  Profile, Seymour, Indi-
    ana).
    See 0975
SEPARATION
    Physical/Chemical Treatment of Hazardous
    Waste Sites: Speaker Slide Copies and Sup-
    porting Information.
    See 1287
SEPARATION PROCESSES
    Carver-Greenfield  Process  (Trade  Name)
    Dehydro-Tech  Corporation.   Applications
    Analysis Report.
    See 1207
SETTLEMENTS
    Report to Congress: Settlements with Munic-
    ipal Waste Generators and  Transporters
    Since  1991 under the Comprehensive Envi-
    ronmental Response, Compensation, and Li-
    ability Act of 1980.
    See 0596
SU-76

-------
                                                        SUBJECT INDEX
                                                                                          SITE ENFORCEMENT TRACKING SYSTEM
 SEWAGE SLUDGE
    Report to Congress: Settlements with Munic-
    ipal  Waste  Generators  and  Transporters
    Since 1991 under the Comprehensive Envi-
    ronmental Response, Compensation, and Li-
    ability Act of 1980.
    See 0596
 SEWAGE TREATMENT
    Air/Superfund National Technical  Guidance
    Study Series. Database  of  Emission Rate
    Measurement Projects.
    See 1379
    Respirometrio Methods for Determination of
    Biodegradability and Biodegradation Kinetics
    for  Hazardous   Organic  Pollutant  Com-
    pounds.
    See 1427
 SEWAGE TREATMENT PLANTS
    CERCLA Site Discharges to POTWs: Guid-
    ance Manual.
    See 1576
 SEWERS
    Overview of Selected  EPA  (Environmental
    Protection Agency) Regulations and Guid-
    ance  Affecting   POTW  (Publicly  Owned
    Treatment Works) Management
    See 0432
 SHORT TERM EXPOSURE
    Air/Superfund National Technical  Guidance
    Study Series:  Evaluation  of  Short-Term Air
    Action Levels for Superfund Sites.
    See 1386
 SIGNS
    Public Awareness Signs at Superfund Sites.
    See 0481
 SILICATE TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION
    Applications Analysis Report: Silicate Tech-
    nology  Corporation's Solidification/Stabiliza-
    tion Technology for Organic and  Inorganic
    Contaminants in Soils.
    See 1550
 SINGLE GEL ELECTROPHORESIS
    Evaluation of Exposure Markers.
    See 1246
 SITE CHARACTERIZATION
    Expectations for  Full  Implementation   of
    SACM.
    See 0092
    Integrating Removal and Remedial Site  As-
    sessment Investigations.
    See 0939
    International Symposium on Field Screening
    Methods for Hazardous Wastes and Toxic
    Chemicals (2nd),  Proceedings.  Held  in  Las
    Vegas, Nevada on February 12-14,1991.
    See 1279
    Presumptive Remedies: Site Characterization
    and Technology Selection for CERCLA Sites
    with Volatile Organic Compounds in Soils.
    See 1104
SITE DISCHARGES
    CERCLA Site Discharges  to  POTWs: Guid-
    ance Manual.
    See 1576
SITE ENFORCEMENT TRACKING SYSTEM
    Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
    Frequency by Party Name Report.
    See 0607
    Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
    Frequency by Party Name Report.
    See 0608
    Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
    Frequency by Party Name Report.
    See 0609
    Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
    Frequency by PRP Name Report, September
    26, .1991.
    See 0610
 Site Enforcement Tracking System  (SETS):
 National Alphabetical Report by PRP Name,
 September 26, 1991.
 See 0612
 Site Enforcement Tracking System  (SETS):
 National Frequency by PRP  Name  Report.
 See 0614
 Site Enforcement Tracking System  (SETS):
 National PRP Listing Alphabetically  by PRP
 Name.
 See 0615
 Site Enforcement Tracking System  (SETS):
 National PRP Listing by Site.
 See 0617
 Site Enforcement Tracking System  (SETS):
 National PRP Listing by Site.
 See 0618
 Site Enforcement Tracking System  (SETS):
 National PRP Report by Site, September 26,
 1991.
 See 0619
 Site Enforcement Tracking System  (SETS)
 (National - 3 1/2 Inch Diskette, IBM PS/2
 Compatible) (for Microcomputers).
 See 0620
 Site Enforcement Tracking System  (SETS):
 PRP Listing by Site for Alabama.
 See 0621
 Site Enforcement Tracking System  (SETS):
 PRP Listing by Site for Alabama.
 See 0622
 Site Enforcement Tracking System  (SETS):
 PRP Listing by Site for Alabama.
 See 0623
 Site Enforcement Tracking System  (SETS):
 PRP Listing by Site  for American  Samoa.
 See 0624
 Site Enforcement Tracking System  (SETS):
 PRP Listing by Site  for American  Samoa.
 See 0625
 Site Enforcement Tracking System  (SETS):
 PRP Listing by Site  for American  Samoa.
 See 0626
 Site Enforcement Tracking System  (SETS):
 PRP Listing by Site for Arizona.
 See 0627
 Site Enforcement Tracking System  (SETS):
 PRP Listing by Site for Arizona.
 See 0628
 Site Enforcement Tracking System  (SETS):
 PRP Listing by Site for Arizona.
 See 0629
 Site Enforcement Tracking System  (SETS):
 PRP Listing by Site for Arkansas.
 See 0630
 Site Enforcement Tracking System  (SETS):
 PRP Listing by Site for Arkansas.
 See 0631
 Site Enforcement Tracking System  (SETS):
 PRP Listing by Site for Arkansas.
 See 0632
 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
 PRP Listing by Site for California.
 See 0633
 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
 PRP Listing by Site for California.
 See 0634
 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
 PRP Listing by Site for California.
 See 0635
 Site Enforcement  Tracking System (SETS):
 PRP Listing by Site for Colorado.
 See 0636
 Site Enforcement  Tracking System (SETS):
 PRP Listing by Site for Colorado.
See 0637
Site Enforcement  Tracking System (SETS):
 PRP Listing by Site for Colorado.
See 0638
Site Enforcement  Tracking System (SETS):
 PRP Listing by Site for Connecticut.
See 0639
 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
 PRP Listing by Site for Connecticut.
 See 0640
 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
 PRP Listing by Site for Connecticut.
 See 0641
 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
 PRP Listing by Site for Delaware.
 See 0642
 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
 PRP Listing by Site for Delaware.
 See 0643
 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
 PRP Listing by Site for Delaware.
 See 0644
 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
 PRP Listing by Site for Florida.
 See 0645
 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
 PRP Listing by Site for Florida.
 See 0646
 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
 PRP Listing by Site for Florida.
 See 0647
 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
 PRP Listing by Site for Georgia.
 See 0648
 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
 PRP Listing by Site for Georgia.
 See 0649
 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
 PRP Listing by Site for Georgia.
 See 0650
 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
 PRP Listing by Site for Idaho.
 See 0651
 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
 PRP Listing by Site for Idaho.
 See 0652
 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
 PRP Listing by Site for Idaho.
 See 0653
 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
 PRP Listing by Site for Illinois.
 See 0654
 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
 PRP Listing by Site for Illinois.
 See 0655
 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
 PRP Listing by Site for Illinois.
 See 0656
 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
 PRP Listing by Site for Indiana.
 See 0657
 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
 PRP Listing by Site for Indiana.
 See 0658
 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
 PRP Listing by Site for Indiana.
 See 0659
 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
 PRP Listing by Site for Iowa.
 See 0660
 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
 PRP Listing by Site for Iowa.
See 0661
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
 PRP Listing by Site for Iowa.
See 0662
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
 PRP Listing by Site for Kansas.
See 0663
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Kansas.
See 0664
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Kansas.
See 0665
                                                                                                                             SU-77

-------
SITE ENFORCEMENT TRACKING SYSTEM
                    II i   lli'l'lili"
    Site Enforcement tracking System (SETS):
    'PRP Listing by Site for Kentucky.
    Sea 0666
    Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
    PRP Listing by Site for Kentucky.
    SM0667
    SKa Enforcement Tracking System CSETS):
    PRP Listing by Site for Kentucky.
    See 0668
    Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
    PRP Listing by Site for Louisiana.
    Sea 0669
    :Sjto Enforcement	Tracking System (SETS):
    PfiP 'Gsilng by Site'fbr Louisiana.
    Sea 0670
    SJta Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
    PRP Listing by Site for Louisiana.
    Sea 0671
    Site Enforoomont Tracking System (SETS):
    PRP Listing by Site for Maine.
    Sea 0672	
    Sfta Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
    PRP Listing by Site" for Maine.
    Sea 0673
    ;Sjta Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
    "p'&P Listing by Site'for Maine.
    Sea 0674	
    Stta Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
    ,PRP Listing by Site for Maryland.
    Sea 0675
    Sfta Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
    £RP Lisjing by Site for Maryland.
    Seo0676
    Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
    PRP Listing by Site for Maryland.
    S4M0677
    Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
    .PRP Listing by Site for Massachusetts.
    §•00678
    Stta Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
    PRP Listing by Site for Massachusetts.
    Seo 0679
    Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
    PRP Listing by Site for Massachusetts.
    See 0680
    Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
    PRP Listing by Site for Michigan.
    Sea 0681
    Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
    PRP Listing by Site for Michigan.
    Sea 0682
    Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
    PRP Listing by Site for Michigan.
    Soa 0683
    Sta Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
    PRP Listing by Site for Minnesota.
    Sea 0684
    Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
    PRP Listing by Site for Minnesota.
    See 0685
    ,Sjte Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
    PRP Listing by Site for Minnesota.
    Sea 0686
    Stta Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
    PRP Listing by Site for Mississippi.
    Sea 0687
    Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
    PRP Listing by Site for Mississippi.
    Sea 0688
    Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
    ERR Listing by Site for Mississippi.
    Sea 0689
    Stta Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
    PRP Usting by Site for Missouri.
    See 0690
    ;Sjte EnforcementTracking System (SETS):
    ",PfiP" Listing by Site for Missouri.
    8060691
    Stta Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
    PRP Usting by Site for Missouri.
    8090692


sU-78            !:	'!
                                                                        SUBJECT INDEX
                                                                 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
                                                                 PRP Listing by Site for Montana.
                                                                 See 0693
                                                                 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
                                                                 PRP Listing by Site for Montana.
                                                                 See 0694
                                                                 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
                                                                 PRP Listing by Site for Montana.
                                                                 See 0695
                                                                 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
                                                                 PRP Listing by Site for Nebraska.
                                                                 See 0696
                                                                 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
                                                                 PRP Listing by Site for Nebraska.
                                                                 See 0697
                                                                 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
                                                                 PRP Listing by Site for Nebraska.
                                                                 See 0698
                                                                 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
                                                                 PRP Listing by Site for Nevada.
                                                                 See 0699
                                                                 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
                                                                 PRP Listing by Site for Nevada.
                                                                 See 0700
                                                                 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
                                                                 PRP Listing by Site for Nevada.
                                                                 See 0701
                                                                 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
                                                                 PRP Listing by Site for New Hampshire.
                                                                 See 0702
                                                                 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
                                                                 PRP Listing by Site for New Hampshire.
                                                                 See 0703
                                                                 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
                                                                 PRP Listing by Site for New Hampshire.
                                                                 See 0704
                                                                 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
                                                                 PRP Listing by Site for New Jersey.
                                                                 See 0705
                                                                 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
                                                                 PRP Listing by Site for New Jersey.
                                                                 See 0706
                                                                 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
                                                                 PRP Listing by Site for New Jersey.
                                                                 See 0707
                                                                 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
                                                                 PRP Listing by Site for New Mexico.
                                                                 See 0708
                                                                 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
                                                                 PRP Listing by Site for New Mexico.
                                                                 See 0709
                                                                 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
                                                                 PRP Listing by Site for New Mexico.
                                                                 See 0710
                                                                 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
                                                                 PRP Listing by Site for New York.
                                                                 See 0711
                                                                 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
                                                                 PRP Listing by Site for New York.
                                                                 See 0712
                                                                 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
                                                                 PRP Listing by Site for New York.
                                                                 See 0713
                                                                 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
                                                                 PRP Listing by Site for North Carolina.
                                                                 See 0714
                                                                 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
                                                                 PRP Listing by Site for North Carolina.
                                                                 See 0715
                                                                 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
                                                                 PRP Listing by Site for North Carolina.
                                                                 See 0716
                                                                 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
                                                                 PRP Usting by Site for North Dakota.
                                                                 See 0717
                                                                 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
                                                                 PRP Usting by Site for North Dakota.
                                                                 See 0718
                                                                 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
                                                                 PRP Listing by Site for North Dakota.
                                                                 See 0719
                                       [    ,   •'    .               ''     i

                               Site Enforcement Tracking System  (SETS):
                               PRP Listing by Site for  Northern Marianas.
                               See 0720
                               Site Enforcement Tracking System  (SETS):
                               PRP Listing by Site for  Northern Marianas.
                               See 0721
                               Site Enforcement Tracking System  (SETS):
                               PRP Listing by Site for  Northern Marianas.
                               See 0722
                               Site Enforcement Tracking System  (SETS):
                               PRP Usting by Site for Ohio.
                               See 0723
                               Site Enforcement Tracking System  (SETS):
                               PRP Listing by Site for Ohio.
                               See 0724
                               Site Enforcement Tracking System  (SETS):
                               PRP Listing by Site for Ohio.
                               See 0725
                               Site Enforcement Tracking System  (SETS):
                               PRP Usting by Site for Oklahoma.
                               See 0726
                               Site Enforcement Tracking System  (SETS):
                               PRP Usting by Site for Oklahoma.
                               See 0727
                               Site Enforcement Tracking System  (SETS):
                               PRP Listing by Site for Oklahoma.
                               See 0728
                               Site Enforcement Tracking System  (SETS):
                               PRP Listing by Site for Oregon.
                               See 0729
                               Site Enforcement Tracking System  (SETS):
                               PRP Listing by Site for Oregon.
                               See 0730
                               Site Enforcement Tracking System  (SETS):
                               PRP Usting by Site for Oregon.
                               See 0731
                               Site Enforcement Tracking System  (SETS):
                               PRP Listing by Site for Pennsylvania.
                               See 0732
                               Site Enforcement Tracking System  (SETS):
                               PRP Listing by Site for Pennsylvania.
                               See 0733
                               Site Enforcement Tracking System  (SETS):
                               PRP Usting by Site for Pennsylvania.
                               See 0734
                               Site Enforcement Tracking System  (SETS):
                               PRP Listing by Site for Puerto Rico.
                               See 0735
                               Site Enforcement Tracking System  (SETS):
                               PRP Listing by Site for Puerto Rico.
                               See 0736
                               Site Enforcement Tracking System  (SETS):
                               PRP Usting by Site for Puerto Rico.
                               See 0737
                               Site Enforcement Tracking System  (SETS):
                               PRP Usting by Site for Region 1.
                               See 0738
                               Site Enforcement Tracking System  (SETS):
                               PRP Usting by Site for Region  1. Volume 1.
                               See 0742
                               Site Enforcement Tracking System  (SETS):
                               PRP Usting by Site for Region 2.
                               See 0743
                               Site Enforcement Tracking System  (SETS):
                               PRP Listing by Site for Region  2. Volume 2.
                               See 0747
                               Site Enforcement Tracking System  (SETS):
                               PRP Listing by Site for Region 3.
                               See 0748
                               Site Enforcement Tracking System  (SETS):
                               PRP Usting by Site for Region  3. Volume 3.
                               See 0751
                               Site Enforcement Tracking System  (SETS):
                               PRP Listing by Site for Region 4.
                               See 0752
                               Site Enforcement Tracking System  (SETS):
                                PRP Usting by Site for Region  4. Volume 4.
                               See 0756
I             	iiii,!,,
                                                   .  , ..
                                               ii,,,,:!!.;;!:,!;!	ii
riLJ	.j	liftliii!^	ii	Ilii	ftiiLu;:ili.i

-------
                                                     SUBJECT INDEX
                                                                                       SITE ENFORCEMENT TRACKING SYSTEM
 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
 PRP Listing by Site for Region 5.
 See 0757
 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
 PRP Listing by Site for Region 5. Volume 5.
 See 0761
 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
 PRP Listing by Site for Region 6.
 See 0762
 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
 PRP Listing by Site for Region 6. Volume 6.
 See 0766
 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
 PRP Listing by Site for Region 7.
 See 0767
 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
 PRP Listing by Site for Region 7. Volume 7.
 See 0771
 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
 PRP Listing by Site for Region 8.
 See 0772
 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
 PRP Listing by Site for Region 8. Volume 8.
 See 0776
 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
 PRP Listing by Site for Region 9.
 See 0777
 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
 PRP Listing by Site for Region 9.
 See 0778
 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
 PRP Listing by Site for Region 9. Volume 9.
 See 0781
 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
 PRP Listing by Site for Region 10.
 See 0782
 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
 PRP Listing by Site for Region 10. Volume
 10.
 See 0786
 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
 PRP Listing by Site for Rhode Island.
 See 0787
 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
 PRP Listing by Site for Rhode Island.
 See 0788
 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
 PRP Listing by Site for Rhode Island.
 See 0789
 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
 PRP Listing by Site for South Carolina.
 See 0790
 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
 PRP Listing by Site for South Carolina.
 See 0791
 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
 PRP Listing by Site for South Carolina.
 See 0792
 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
 PRP Listing by Site for South Dakota.
 See 0793
 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
 PRP Listing by Site for South Dakota.
 See 0794
 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
 PRP Listing by Site for South Dakota.
 See 0795
 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
 PRP Listing by Site for Tennessee.
 See 0796
 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
 PRP Listing by Site for Tennessee.
See 0797
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Tennessee.
See 0798
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
 PRP Listing by Site for Texas.
See 0799
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Texas.
See 0800
 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
 PRP Listing by Site for Texas.
 See 0801
 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
 PRP Listing by Site for Trust Territories.
 See 0802
 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
 PRP Listing by Site for Trust Territories'.
 See 0803
 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
 PRP Listing by Site for Trust Territories.
 See 0804
 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
 PRP Listing by Site for Utah.
 See 0805
 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
 PRP Listing by Site for Utah.
 See 0806
 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
 PRP Listing by Site for Utah.
 See 0807
 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
 PRP Listing by Site for Vermont.
 See 0808
 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
 PRP Listing by Site for Vermont.
 See 0809
 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
 PRP Listing by Site for Vermont.
 See 0810
 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
 PRP Listing by Site for Virginia.
 See 0811
 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
 PRP Listing by Site for Virginia.
 See 0812
 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
 PRP Listing by Site for Washington.
 See 0813
 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
 PRP Listing by Site for Washington.
 See 0814
 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
 PRP Listing by Site for Washington.
 See 0815
 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
 PRP Listing by Site for West Virginia.
 See 0816
 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
 PRP Listing by Site for West Virginia.
 See 0817
 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
 PRP Listing by Site for West Virginia.
 See 0818
 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
 PRP Listing by Site for Wisconsin.
 See 0819
 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
 PRP Listing by Site for Wisconsin.
 See 0820
 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
 PRP Listing by Site for Wisconsin.
 See 0821
 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
 PRP Listing by Site for Wyoming.
 See 0822
 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
 PRP Listing by Site for Wyoming.
 See 0823
 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
 PRP Listing by Site for Wyoming.
 See 0824
 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
 PRP National  Frequency by  Party Name,
January 22, 1992.
See 0825
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
 PRP National Listing Alphabetically by  Party
 Name.
See 0826
 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
 PRP National Listing Alphabetically by Party
 Name.
 See 0827
 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
 PRP National Listing Alphabetically by Party
 Name.
 See 0828
 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
 PRP National Listing Alphabetically by Party
 Name.
 See 0829
 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
 PRP National Listing by Site.
 See 0832
 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
 PRP National Listing by Site.
 See 0833
 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
 PRP National Listing by Site.
 See 0834
 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
 PRP National Listing by Site.
 See 0835
 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
 PRP Report by Site for Region 2, September
 26, 1991.
 See 0839
 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
 PRP Report by Site for Region 3, September
 26, 1991.
 See 0840
 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
 PRP Report by Site for Region 4, September
 26, 1991.
 See 0841
 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
 PRP Report by Site for Region 5, September
 26, 1991.
 See 0842
 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
 PRP Report by Site for Region 6, September
 26, 1991.
 See 0843
 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
 PRP Report by Site for Region 7, September
 26, 1991.
 See 0844
 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
 PRP Report by Site for Region 9, September
 26,1991.
 See 0846
 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
 PRP Report by Site  for Region 10, Septem-
 ber 26, 1991.
 See 0847
 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
 PRP Site Listing by Site for Virginia.
 See 0848
 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)
 (Region 1 - 3 1/2 Inch Diskette IBM PS/2
 Compatible) (for Microcomputers).
 See 0849
 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)
 (Region 2-3 1/2 Inch Diskette IBM PS/2
 Compatible) (for Microcomputers).
 See 0851
 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)
 (Region 3-31/2 Inch Diskette IBM PS/2
 Compatible) (for Microcomputers).
 See 0853
 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)
 (Region 4-3 1/2 Inch Diskette IBM PS/2
Compatible) (for Microcomputers).
See 0855
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)
 (Region 5-31/2 Inch Diskette IBM PS/2
Compatible) (for Microcomputers).
See 0857
                                                                                                                          SU-79

-------
SITE ENFORCWE(4T TICKING SYSTEM
          SUBJECT INDEX
    Stte  Enforcement Tracking System  (SETS)
   i (Region 6-31/2 Inch Diskette IBM PS/2
   • Compatible) (for Microcomputers).
   ;;, See, 0859
   : Site  Enforcement tracking System  (SETS)
    (Ragtort 7-31/2 Inch Diskette IBM PS/2
    Compatible) (for Microcomputers).
    See 0861
    Site  Enforcement Tracking System  (SETS)
    (Regton 8-31/2 Inch Diskette IBM PS/2
    Compatible) (for Microcomputers).
    Sea 0863
    Site  Enforcement Tracking System  (SETS)
    (Region 9-31/2 Inch Diskette IBM PS/2
    Compatible) (for Microcomputers).
    Sea 0865
   '. Sit*  Enforcement Tracking System  (SETS)
   £ {Region 10-3 1/2 Inch Diskette IBM PS/2
   i: CoropatWa) (for Microcomputers).
   ;;See, 06,67
Srf| oiFOftCMEffT f RA^
   I, 'Sits"  Enforcement Tracking System" (SETS):
   : PRP Report by Site for Region 1, September
    26, 1991.
    2880838
SITE PROGRAM
   ...... Quality Assurance for the SITE (Superfund
    Innovative Technology Evaluation) Program
    Demonstrations.
    See 0992 ......................
   11 Superfund Innovative Technology Evaluation
    Program:  Technology Profiles,  November
    1989.
   I See 1317 .................................
    Technology  Evaluation Report: StTE Pro-
   - gram Demonstration  Test Horsehead  Re-
    source Development  Company, Inc.,  Flame
    Reactor Technology, Monaca, Pennsylvania.
    See 1353
   i Technology Evaluation Report SITE Program
    Demonstration Test, HAZCON Solidification,
   i Dooglassvflta, Pennsylvania. Volume 1.
    See 1569
StTE SELECTION
    Superfund Fact Sheet: Identifying Sites.
    See 0491
SITE (SUPERFUND INNOVATIVE
                             ............
   =-SITE  Program" Demonstration of the' SBP
   I leohnotogies,  Inc.,  Membrane   Filtration
   • System on Creosote-Contaminated Water.
    See 1S92
    Superfund Innovative Technology Evaluation
   " Program: Annual Report to Congress 1992.
    See 1309
   I Superfund Innovative Technology Evaluation
....... Program: Technology Profiles, Sixth Edition.
 .......... See 1318 ..................
SITE SURVEYS
   : ..... Kdolikmal Guidance oh 'Worst  Sites'  and
   :J!|II;?«H. Caliber Sites; to Assist in SACM Imple-
   11 ..... rrwntaibrl
    S000083
    Assessing Sites under SACM: Interim Guid-
    ance,  Volume 1,  Number 4, Deccember
   ;=:1992.
    See 0084
    Assessment of Tentatively Identified Com-
    pounds in Superfund Samples.
    See 1199
    Development  of  Emerging   Technologies
    within the SITE Program.
    See 1231 ...............................
    Ecosystem  Effects  of  Superfund.  National
    Priority List Sites in Industrial  Landscapes: A
    Framework for Policy Decisions.
    Sea 0135
    Environmental Compliance Branch, Standard
    Operating Procedures and Quality Assurance
    Manual, Revision 1.
    866,0535
    Guidance for Performing  Site  Inspections
    under CERCLA.
    See 0343
    Guidance on Setting Priorities for NPL Can-
    didate Sites.
    See 0344
    Guidance on Site Assessment Cooperative
    Agreements.
    See 0475
    Importance of Quality for Collection of Envi-
    ronmental Samples. Planning,  Implementing,
    and Assessing Field  Sampling Quality  at
    CERCLA Sites.
    See 0919
    In-situ  Stabilization/Solidification of  PCB
    (Polychlorinated    BiphenylsJ-Contaminated
    Soil.
    See 1556
    Management    of    Investigation-Derived
    Wastes during Site Inspections.
    See 0349
    PA-Scpre (Preliminary Assessment  Score),
    Version 2.1,  31/2 inch (for Microcomput-
    ers).
    See 0369
    PA-Score (Preliminary Assessment  Score),
    Version 2.1,  51/4 inch (for Microcomput-
    ers).
    See 0370
    PREscore Software. Users Manual and Tuto-
    rial. Version 1.0.
    See 0374
    Evaluation of Modifications to Extraction Pro-
    cedures Used in Analysis of Environmental
    Samples from Superfund Sites.
    See 1247
    Summary of GIS Support to Superfund.
    See 1307
    Superfund Emergency Response Actions: A
    Summary of Federally Funded Removals.
    Volume 3.
    See 0318
    Superfund Fact Sheet: Identifying Sites.
    See 0491
    Superfund Innovative Technology Evaluation
    Program:  Technology  Profiles,  November
    1989.
    See 1317
    Supplemental Guide to Video on Superfund
    Site Assessment Screening: A National Pri-
    ority.
    See 0394
    Survey  of Materials-Handling Technologies
    Used at Hazardous Waste Sites.
    See 1323
    Terra Vac In situ Vacuum Extraction System:
    Applications Analysis Report.
    See 1355
    Terra Vac In situ Vacuum Extraction System:
    Applications Analysis Report.
    See 1356
SITES
    Accessing Federal Data Bases for Contami-
    nated Site Clean-Up Technologies.
    See 1188
    Bibliography of Federal Reports and Publica-
    tions Describing Alternative and Innovative
    Treatment  Technologies   for   Corrective
    Action and Site Remediation.
    See 1206
    CERCLIS Characterization  Project: National
    Results.
    See 0001
    CERCLIS Characterization Project: Region 1
    Results.
    See 0002
CERCLIS Characterization Project: Region 2
Results.
See 0003
CERCLIS Characterization Project: Region 3
Results".
See 0004
CERCLIS Characterization Project: Region 4
Results.
See 0005
CERCLIS Characterization Project: Region 5
Results.
See 0006
CERCLIS Characterization Project: Region 6
Results.
See 0007
CERCLIS Characterization Project: Region 7
Results.
See 0008
CERCLIS Characterization Project: Region 8
Results.
See 0009
CERCLIS Characterization Project: Region 9
Results.
See 0010
CERCLIS  Characterization  Project:  Region
10 Results.
See 0011
CERCLIS  (Comprehensive   Environmental
Response, Compensation, and Liability Infor-
mation System) Site Location Extract.
See 0012
Cleaning Up  the Nation's Waste Sites: Mar-
kets and Technology Trends.
See 0132
ECO Update: Ecological Assessment of Su-
perfund Sites.  An  Overview.  Volume  1,
Number 2, December 1991.
See 1019
ECO Update: The Role of BTAGs in Ecologi-
cal Assessment. Volume  1,  Number 1, Sep-
tember 1991.
See 1020
Guidance for Performing Preliminary Assess-
ments under CERCLA.
See 0342
Guide  to  Community  Involvement for Site
Assessment  Managers.
See 0476
Policy  for Superfund Compliance with the
RCRA Land Disposal Restrictions.
See 0436
Site Enforcement Tracking  System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 1.
See 0740
Site Enforcement Tracking  System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 2.
See 0745
Site Enforcement Tracking  System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 3.
See 0749
Site Enforcement Tracking  System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 4.
See 0754
Site Enforcement Tracking  System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 5.
See 0759
Site Enforcement Tracking  System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 6.
See 0764
Site Enforcement Tracking  System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 7.
See 0769
Site Enforcement Tracking  System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 8.
See 0774
Site Enforcement Tracking  System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for  Region 9.
See 0779
SU-80

-------
                                                         SUBJECT INDEX
                                                                                                                    SOIL CHEMISTRY
     Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
     PRP Listing by Site for Region 10.
     See 0784
     Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
     PRP National Listing Alphabetically by Party
     Name.
     See 0830
     Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
     PRP National Listing by Site.
     See 0836
     Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
     PRP Report by Site for Region 8, September
     26, 1991.
     See 0845
     Superfund  Accelerated  Cleanup  Model
     (SACM).
     See 0119
     Technical Support Services  for Superfund
     Site Remediation. Second Edition.
     See 1335
 SLAGS
     Horsehead Resource Development Compa-
     ny, Inc., Flame Reactor Technology. Tech-
     nology Demonstration Summary.
     See 1264
     EPA SITE Demonstration of the Horsehead
     Resource Development Company Flame Re-
     actor Technology.
     See 1242
     Superfund Innovative Technology Evaluation
     (SITE): Demonstration Bulletin. Flame Reac-
     tor,  Horsehead  Resource  Development
     Company, Inc.
     See 1319
 SLUDGE
     Pilot-Scale  Incineration  of  Contaminated
     Sludges  from the  Bofors-Nobel Superfund
     Site.
     See 1289
 SLUDGE TREATMENT
     SITE Demonstration of the Basic Extractive
     Sludge Treatment Process.
     See 1300
     Resources  Conservation  Company B.E.S.T.
     (Trade  Name) Solvent Extraction Technolo-
     gy: Application Analysis Report.
     See 1294
 SLURRIES
     Innovative Technology: Slurry-Phase Biode-
     gradation.
     See 1271
     On-Site  Engineering Report of the Slurry-
     Phase  Biological  Reactor for  Pilot-Scale
    Testing on Contaminated Soil.
    See 1520
    Slurry Biodegradation.
    See 1428
 SLURRY BIO-REACTORS
     Pilot-Scale Demonstration of a Slurry-Phase
    Biological Reactor for Creosote-Contaminat-
    ed Soil. Applications Analysis Report.
    See 1426
    EPA SITE Demonstration of the  BioTrol Soil
    Washing Process.
    See 1502
SLURRY WALLS
    Engineering Bulletin: Slurry Walls.
    See 1235
SMALL BUSINESSES
    Mentor-Protege Program.
    See 0044
SMALL SYSTEMS
    Small Systems Meet Superfund Challenge
    with Point-of-Entry Treatment Units.
    See 1304
SMELTERS
    Draft Record of Decision for the Aluminum
    Smelter   Conservation/Modernization  Pro-
    gram.
    See 1087
SOFTWARE
    BEN Model: Calculates Violators' Economic
    Benefits  from  Noncompliance (Version 4.0)
    (for Microcomputers).
    See 0514
    CASHOUT Model:  Calculates Current Value
    of  Superfund  Cleanup  Costs  (Version 1.2)
    (for Microcomputers).
    See 1208
    Environmental  Monitoring  Methods  Index
    (EMMI),  Version 1.0 (5 - User  LAN) (for
    Microcomputers).
    See 1238
    Environmental  Monitoring  Methods  Index
    (EMMI), Version 1.0 (for Microcomputers).
    See 1239
    Environmental  Monitoring  Methods  Index
    (EMMI),  Version 1.0 (Unlimited  User LAN)
    (for Microcomputers).
    See 1240
    Inorganic Contract  Compliance  Screening
  ,  System (ICCSS) Software (for Microcomput-
    ers).
    See 0034
    Inorganic Contract  Compliance  Screening
    System (ICCSS)  Software (ILM02.1  Version
    2) (for Microcomputers).
    See 0036
    Inorganic Contract  Compliance  Screening
    System (ICCSS)  Software (ILM02.1  Version
    3) (for Microcomputers).
    See 0037
    Inorganic Contract  Compliance  Screening
    System (ICCSS)  Software (ILM02.1  Version
    4) (for Microcomputers).
    See 0038
    Inorganic Contract  Compliance  Screening
    System (ICCSS)  Software (ILM02.1  Version
    5) (for Microcomputers).
    See 0039
    Inorganic Contract  Compliance  Screening
    System  (ICCSS)  Software (SOW   March
    1990) (Version 1) (for Microcomputers).
    See 0040
    Organic  Contract  Compliance   Screening
    System (OCCSS) Software  (for Microcom-
    puters).
    See 0047
    Organic  Contract  Compliance   Screening
    System (OCCSS) Software  (OLM01.8 Ver-
    sion 2)  (for Microcomputers).
    See 0049
    Organic  Contract  Compliance   Screening
    System (OCCSS) Software  (OLM01.8 Ver-
    sion 3)  (for Microcomputers).
    See 0050
    Organic  Contract  Compliance   Screening
    System (OCCSS) Software  (OLM01.8 Ver-
    sion 4)  (for Microcomputers).
   See 0051
   Organic  Contract  Compliance   Screening
   System (OCCSS) Software (OLM01.8 Ver-
   sion 5)  (for Microcomputers).
   See 0052
   Organic  Contract  Compliance  Screening
   System (OCCSS) Software (OLM01.8 Ver-
   sion 6)  (for Microcomputers).
   See 0053
   Organic  Contract  Compliance  Screening
   System (OCCSS) Software (SOW February
   1988) (for Microcomputers).
   See 0054
   Organic  Contract  Compliance  Screening
   System  (OCCSS) Software (SOW  March
   1990) (Version 1) (for Microcomputers).
   See 0055
     Organic  Contract  Compliance  Screening
     System (OCCSS) Software (SOW OLM01.8
     Version  January  1992)  (Version  1)  (for
     Microcomputers).
     See 0056
     PA-Score (Preliminary Assessment Score),
     Version 1.0 (for Microcomputers).
     See 0368
     PA-Score (Preliminary Assessment Score),
     Version 2.1, 3  1/2 inch  (for  Microcomput-
  .   ers).
     See 0369
     PA-Score (Preliminary Assessment Score),
     Version 2.1, 5  1/4 inch  (for  Microcomput-
     ers).
     See 0370
     Preliminary  Ranking  Evaluation   Score
     (PREscore) Version  2.0  (for  Microcomput-
     ers).
     See 0373
     Site  Assessment   Information  Directory
     (SAID) Region  1 (for Microcomputers). Date
     of Coverage: October 1991.
     See 0382
     Site  Assessment   Information  Directory
     (SAID) Region  2 (for Microcomputers). Date
     of Coverage: October 1991.
     See 0383
     Site  Assessment   Information  Directory
     (SAID) Region  3 (for Microcomputers). Date
     of Coverage: October 1991.
     See 0384
     Site  Assessment  Information  Directory
     (SAID) Region  4 (for Microcomputers). Date
     of Coverage: October 1991.
     See 0385
     Site  Assessment  Information  Directory
     (SAID) Region  5 (for Microcomputers). Date
     of Coverage: 1991.
     See 0386
     Site  Assessment  Information  Directory
     (SAID) Region  6 (for Microcomputers). Date
     of Coverage: October 1991.
     See 0387
     Site  Assessment  Information  Directory
     (SAID) Region 7 (for Microcomputers). Date
     of Coverage: October 1991.
     See 0388
    Site  Assessment  Information  Directory
     (SAID) Region 8 (for Microcomputers). Date
    of Coverage: 1991.
    See 0389
    Site  Assessment  Information  Directory
    (SAID) Region 9 (for Microcomputers). Date
    of Coverage: October 1991.
    See 0390
    Site  Assessment  Information  Directory
    (SAID) Region 10 (for Microcomputers). Date
    of Coverage: October 1991.
    See 0391
SOIL
    Citizen's Guide to Soil Washing.
    See 0458
SOIL ANALYSIS
    Aseptic Sampling of Unconsolidated Heaving
    Soils in Saturated Zones.
    See 1489
SOIL CHARACTERIZATION
    Characterizing soils for hazardous waste site
    assessments.
    See 1495
SOIL CHEMISTRY
    In  situ Bioremediation of Contaminated Un-
    saturated Subsurface Soils.
    See 1509
                                                                                                                              SU-81

-------
SOIL CLASSIFICATION
          SUBJECT INDEX
SQIL CLASSIFICATION
    Ground-Water Issue: Characterizing Soils for
    Hazardous Waste Site Assessments.
  	Sea 1455      	
S
-------
                                                           SUBJECT INDEX
                                                                                                                        SOLIDIFICATION
  SOIL VACUUM EXTRACTION
      EPA Site Demonstration of the Terra Vac In
      situ  Vacuum Extraction Process in  Grove-
      land, Massachusetts. (Site Program Update-
      Part VII).
      See 1243
  SOIL VAPOR EXTRACTION
      Air/Superfund  National Technical Guidance
      Study Series: Estimation of Air Impacts for
      Soil Vapor Extraction (SVE) Systems
      See 1383
      Guide  for  Conducting Treatability  Studies
      under CERCLA: Soil Vapor Extraction. Quick
      Reference Fact Sheet.
      See  1164
      In situ Soil Vapor Extraction Treatment
     See 1511
     Technology Evaluation Report: Site Program
     Demonstration  Test.  Accutech Pneumatic
     Fracturing Extraction and Hot Gas Injection
     Phase 1. Volume 1.
     See 1352
 SOIL VENTING
     Citizen's Guide to Bioventing.
     See 0453
     Evaluation  of   Soil   Venting  Application.
     Ground Water Issue.
     See 1505
 SOIL WASHING
     BioGenesis  (Trade  Name) Soil Washing
     Technology:  Innovative Technology Evalua-
     tion Report.
     See 1490
     BioTrol Soil Washing System for Treatment
     of  a Wood Preserving Site:   Applications
     Analysis Report.
     See 1492
     Guide for Conducting  Treatability Studies
     under CERCLA: Soil Washing, interim Guid-
     ance.
     See 1165
     Guide for  Conducting  Treatability Studies
     under CERCLA: Soil Washing: Quick Refer-
     ence Fact Sheet.
     See 1166
     Will Soil Working  Work for the Sand Creek
     Superfund Site.
     See 1548
     Soil Washing Treatment.
     See 1532
     Technology  Evaluation  Report:  Biotrol Soil
     Washing System for Treatment  of a Wood
     Preserving Site. Volume 1.
     See 1539
     Technology  Evaluation  Report:  Biotrol Soil
    Washing System for Treatment  of a Wood
     Preserving Site. Volume 2, Part A.
    See 1540
    Technology  Evaluation  Report  Biotrol Soil
    Washing  System for Treatment  of a Wood
    Preserving Site. Volume 2, Part B.
    See 1541
    Toronto Harbour Commissioners (THC) Soil
    Recycle Treatment Train. Applications Analy-
    sis Report.
    See 1544
SOILS
    Air/Superfund National  Technical Guidance
    Study Series. Development of Example  Pro-
    cedures for  Evaluating  the  Air  Impacts of
    Soil Excavation  Associated with Superfund
    Remedial Actions.
    See 1380
    Citizen's Guide to Thermal Desorption.
    See 0460
    Compendium of ERT Soil Sampling and Sur-
    face Geophysics Procedures.
    See 0904
     Determining Soil  Response Action  Levels
     Based on Potential Contaminant Migration to
     Ground Water: A Compendium of Examples.
     See 1497
     Development of Electro-Acoustic Soil  De-
     contamination (ESD) Process for  In situ Ap-
     plications.
     See 1498
     Ground-Water Issue: Soil sampling and anal-
     ysis for volatile organic compounds.
     See 1507
     Guide  for  Conducting  Treatability  Studies
     under CERCLA: Soil Vapor Extraction. Inter-
     im Guidance.
     See 1163
     Innovative Treatment  Technologies:  Semi-
     Annual Status Report (Fourth Edition).
     See 1273
     On-Site Engineering Report of the  Slurry-
     Phase  Biological  Reactor  for  Pilot-Scale
     Testing on Contaminated Soil.
     See 1520
     Operations and  Research at the  U.S. EPA
     Incineration   Research   Facility:   Annual
     Report for FY89.
     See 1482
     Pilot-Scale Incineration  of Contaminated Soil
     from the Purity Oil Sales and McColl Super-
     fund Sites.
     See 1290
     Presentations   EPA-State  Soil  Standards
     Conference. Held in Crystal City, Virginia on
     January 29, 1991.
     See 1524
     Rationale for the Assessment of Errors in
     the Sampling of Soils.
     See 1526
     Removal  Program  Representative  Sampling
     Guidance. Volume 1. Soil.
     See 1010
     Control Technologies  for  Remediation  of
     Contaminated  Soil and  Waste Deposits at
     Superfund Lead Battery Recycling Sites.
     See 1221
     EPA SITE Demonstration of the  BioTrol Soil
     Washing Process.
     See 1502
     Summary of  Treatment Technology Effec-
     tiveness for Contaminated Soil.
     See 1533
     Technology  Evaluation   Report:  Pilot-Scale
     Demonstration of a Slurry-Phase Biological
     Reactor  for  Creosote-Contaminated  Soil.
     Volume 1.
     See 1542
    Technology Evaluation Report: Site Program
     Demonstration  of a  Trial Excavation at  the
     McColl Superfund Site.
    See 1349
    Vendor  Information  System  for Innovative
    Treatment Technologies (VISITT). Number 1.
    See 1370
SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL
    Notification of  Hazardous Substance  Sites
    (Section 103(c)).
    See 1147
    Solidification/Stabilization  of  Organics and
    Inorganics.
    See 1561
    Superfund Guide to RCRA Management Re-
    quirements for Mineral Processing Wastes
    See 0439
    Technical  Support Services  for  Superfund
    Site Remediation. Second Edition.
    See 1335
    Technology Evaluation Report: International
    Waste Technologies/Geo-Con In situ Stabili-
    zation/Solidification.  Volume  4.   Update
    Report.
    See 1568
SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT
    NACEPT Committee Recommendations  to
    Administrator Browner.
    See 0142
    NACEPT Materials for Meeting Held on Sep-
    tember 20-21, 1993.
    See 0143
    Organic  Contract  Compliance   Screening
    System  (OCCSS)  Software  (OLM01.8 Ver-
    sion 4) (for Microcomputers).
    See 0051
SOLIDIFICATION
    Applications  Analysis Report: Silicate Tech-
    nology Corporation's Solidification/Stabiliza-
    tion Technology for Organic and Inorganic
    Contaminants in Soils.
    See 1550
    Chemfix Technologies,  Inc.  Solidification/
    Stabilization  Process. Application  Analysis
    Report.
    See 1551
    Estimation  of Air Impacts for Solidification
    and Stabilization Processes Used at Super-
    fund Sites. Air/Superfund National Technical
    Guidance Study Series.
    See 1408
    Immobilization Technology Seminar: Speaker
    Slide Copies and Supporting Information.
    See 1555
    In-situ   Stabilization/Solidification  of  PCB
    (Polychlorinated    Biphenyls)-Contaminated
    Soil.
    See 1556
    Description of EPA SITE Demonstration  of
    the HAZCON Stabilization Process at the
    Douglassville, Pennsylvania Superfund Site.
    See 1552
    EPA SITE Demonstration of the International
    Waste  Technologies/Geo-Con In situ Stabili-
    zation/Solidification Process.
    See 1553
    Evaluation of  Waste Stabilized by the Solidi-
    tech SITE Technology.
    See 1554
   SITE Demonstration of the CHEMFIX Solidi-
   fication/Stabilization  Process at the Portable
    Equipment Salvage Company Site.
   See 1559
   Solidification/Stabilization: Is  It Always Ap-
   propriate.
   See 1560
   Sorption, Important  in  Stabilized/Solidified
   Waste Forms.
   See 1563
   Solidification/Stabilization of  Organics  and
   Inorganics.
   See 1561
   Soliditech,  Inc.   Solidification/Stabilization
   Process: Applications Analysis Report.
   See 1562
   Technology  Evaluation   Report  CHEMFIX
   Technologies,   Inc.,  Solidification/Stabiliza-
   tion Process, Clackamas, Oregon. Volume 2.
   See 1339
   Technology   Evaluation  Report:   Chemfix
   Technologies,  Inc. Solidification/Stabilization
   Process, Clackamas,  Oregon. Volume 1.
   See 1566
   Technology Evaluation Report  SITE Program
   Demonstration Test,  HAZCON Solidification,
   Douglassville, Pennsylvania. Volume 1.
   See 1569
   Technology  Evaluation Report: SITE  Pro-
   gram Demonstration  Test, Soliditech,  Inc.,
   Solidification/Stabilization  Process. Volume
   1.
   See 1570
                                                                                                                               SU-83

-------
SOLIDITECH PROCESS
   i Technology Evaluation  Report: SITE  Pro-
    gram  Demonstration Test, Soliditech, Inc.
    Solidification/Stabilization Process.  Volume
   ""'2'.             	"
    Sea 1571
SOilblfECH PROCESS
    Solklltach.   Inc.   Solidification/Stabilization
    Process: Applications Analysis Report
    See 1562
    Technology Evaluation  Report: SITE Pro-
    gram  Demonstration Test, Soliditech, Inc.,
    Solidification/Stabilization  Process. Volume
   ! 1,  '          	
    See 1570
   • Technology Evaluation  Report: SITE Pro-
    gram  Demonstration  Test, Soliditech,  Inc.
    Solidification/Stabilization  Process. Volume
    2.
    See 1571
SOJ.VENT EXTRACTION
  " :=::'''CarW-Grefl'nfield	Process' (Trade  Name)
    behydro-tech   Corporation.    Applications
    Analysts Report.
    See 1207
   ,	Innovative Technology: BEST  Solvent Ex-
   	'.' (faction Process.	
    See 1270
    Evaluation of Modifications to  Extraction Pro-
    cedures Used in Analysis of Environmental
    Samples from Superfund Sites.
    See 1247
    SITE  Demonstration of the CF Systems Or-
    gantes Extraction System.
    See 1301
    Solvent Extraction Processes:  A  Survey  of
    Systems In the StTE Program.
   	See 1305
   	Resources Conservation Company  B.E.S.T.
    (Trade Name)' Solvent  Extraction Technolo-
    gy: Application Analysis Report.
    See 1294
    Solvent Extraction Treatment
    See 1306
    Technology Evaluation Report SITE Pro-
     gram.  CF  Systems   Organics  Extraction
     System,  New   Bedford,   Massachusetts.
     Volume 1.
     See 1346
   -'Technology Evaluation  Report SITE Pro-
   	  gram.  CF  Systems   Organics  Extraction
     System,  New   Bedford,   Massachusetts.
     Volume 2.
     See  1347
   I,.'technology  Evaluation" Report.  SITE Pro-
     gram Demonstration,  Resources Conserva-
     tion  Company,  Basic  Extractive  Sludge
     Treatment (B.E.S.T.  (Trade  Name)),  Grand
     Calumet River, Gary, Indiana. Volume 1.
     See  1593
     Technology  Evaluation Report.  SITE Pro-
     gram Demonstration, Resources Conserva-
     tton  Company,  Baste  Extractive  Sludge
     Treatment (B.E.S.T. (Trade  Name)), Grand
     Calumet River, Gary, Indiana. Volume 2. Part

     See  1594
   	-Technology  Evaluation Report  SITE Pro-
   	.., gram Demonstration, Resources Conserva-
   	i tton   Company,  Baste  Extractive   Sludge
     Treatment (g.E-S.T.  (Trade  Name)), Grant
     Calumet River, Gary, Indiana. Volume 2. Part
     2.
     See 1595
     Technology  Evaluation  Report.  SITE  Pro-
     gram Demonstration,  Resources  Conserva-
     tion   Company,  Basic  Extractive  Sludge
     Treatment  (B.E.S.T.  CTrade Name)), Grand
   	'"' Calumet River, Gary, Indiana. Volume 2. Part
     3.
     See 1596
                                                        SUBJECT  INDEX
                                              SOLVENTS
                                                  Citizen's Guide to Solvent Extraction.
                                                  See 0459
                                              SORPTION
                                                  Basic Concepts  of Contaminant Sorption at
                                                  Hazardous  Waste  Sites  (Ground  Water
                                                  Issue).
                                                  See 1431
                                                  Sorption, Important  in  Stabilized/Solidified
                                                  Waste Forms.
                                                  See 1563
                                              SOUTH CAIRO (NEW YORK)
                                                  Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Clean-
                                                  up Efforts Nationwide, Fall  1992. (American
                                                  Thermostat Corporation, New York).
                                                  See 0942
                                              SOUTH CAROLINA
                                                  National Priorities List Sites: South Carolina.
                                                  See 0266
                                                  National Priorities List Sites: South Carolina.
                                                  See 0267
                                                  National Priorities List Sites: South Carolina,
                                                  1992.
                                                  See 0268
                                                  Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
                                                  PRP Listing by Site for South Carolina.
                                                  See 0790
                                                  Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
                                                  PRP Listing by Site for South Carolina.
                                                  See 0791
                                                  Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
                                                  PRP Listing by Site for South Carolina.
                                                  See 0792
                                               SOUTH DAKOTA
                                                  National Priorities   List Sites:  North  and
                                                  South Dakota.
                                                  See 0241
                                                  National Priorities   List Sites:  North  and
                                                  South Dakota, 1992.
                                                  See 0242
                                                  Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
                                                  PRP Listing by Site for South Dakota.
                                                  See 0793
                                                  Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
                                                   PRP Listing by Site for South Dakota.
                                                   See 0794
                                                   Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
                                                   PRP Listing by Site for South Dakota.
                                                   See 0795
                                               SPOKANE (WASHINGTON STATE)
                                                   Superfund at Work:  Hazardous Waste Clean-
                                                   up Efforts Nationwide, Summer 1993 (North-
                                                   side Landfill Site Profile, Spokane, Washing-
                                                   ton).
                                                   See 0968
                                               STABILIZATION
                                                   Applications Analysis Report: Silicate Tech-
                                                   nology Corporation's Solidification/Stabiliza-
                                                   tion  Technology for Organic  and Inorganic
                                                   Contaminants in Soils.
                                                   See 1550
                                                   Chemfix  Technologies,  Inc.   Solidification/
                                                   Stabilization Process.  Application  Analysis
                                                   Report.
                                                   See 1551
                                                   Estimation  of  Air  Impacts for  Solidification
                                                   and Stabilization Processes Used at Super-
                                                   fund Sites. Air/Superfund  National Technical
                                                   Guidance Study Series.
                                                   See 1408
                                                   Immobilization  Technology Seminar: Speaker
                                                   Slide Copies and Supporting Information.
                                                   See 1555
                                                   In-situ  Stabilization/Solidification  of   PCB
                                                   (Polychlorinated    BiphenylsJ-Contaminated
                                                   Soil.
                                                   See 1556
   Description of EPA SITE Demonstration of'
   the  HAZCON Stabilization  Process  at the
   Douglassville, Pennsylvania Superfund Site.
   See 1552
   EPA SITE Demonstration of the International
   Waste Technologies/Geo-Con In situ Stabili-
   zation/Solidification Process.
   See 1553
   Results from the Stabilization Technologies
   Evaluated by the  Site Program.  New Eng-
   land Environmental Expo 90.
   See 1558
   SITE Demonstration of the CHEMFIX Solidi-
   fication/Stabilization Process at the Portable
   Equipment Salvage Company Site.
   See 1559
   Solidification/Stabilization:  Is  It Always Ap-
   propriate.
   See 1560
   Sorption, Important  in  Stabilized/Solidified
   Waste Forms.
   See 1563
   Solidification/Stabilization  of  Organics and
   Inorganics.
   See 1561
   Superfund Innovative Technology Evaluation
   Technology Demonstration Summary: Chem-
   fix Solidification/Stabilization Process, Clack-
   amas, Oregon.
   See 1564
   Technology  Evaluation Report:  SITE Pro-
   gram  Demonstration  Test, Soliditech, Inc.,
   Solidification/Stabilization  Process.  Volume
   1.
   See 1570
   Technology  Evaluation Report:  SITE Pro-
   gram Demonstration Test, Soliditech,  Inc.
   Solidification/Stabilization  Process.  Volume
   2.
   See 1571
STABILIZED/SOLIDIFIED WASTE
   Sorption,  Important  in Stabilized/Solidified
   Waste Forms.
   See 1563
STANDARD METROPOLITAN STATISTICAL
AREAS
    Estimating  VOC  Emissions from Superfund
    Sites in the Houston-Galveston Texas Area.
    (NNEMS Project No. 1302).
    See 1406
STANDARDS
    Methods  for Evaluating  the Attainment  of
    Cleanup  Standards.  Volume  2.  Ground
    Water.
    See  1469
STANDARDS COMPLIANCE
    BEN: A Model to Calculate the Economic
    Benefit of  Noncompliance.  User's Manual.
    See  0513
STATE GOVERNMENT
    Involvement of Superfund Program Manag-
    ers  in Superfund  Response   Agreement
    Audits.
    See  0099
    Obligation of Funds under Superfund State
    Contracts.
    See 0478
    Status of State Involvement in the Superfund
    Program, FY 80 to FY 89.
    See 0114
 STATE PROGRAMS
    Analysis  of State Superfund Programs:  50-
    State Study, 1990 Update.
    See 0448
    Analysis  of State Superfund Programs:  50-
    State Study. 1991 Update.
     See 0449
  SU-84

-------
                                                          SUBJECT INDEX
                                                                                                                           SUPERFUND
      Enhancing  State  Superfund   Capabilities-
      Nine-State Study.
      See 0471
      Guidance on  Site Assessment  Cooperative
      Agreements.
      See 0475
  STATES (UNITED STATES)
      Analysis of State Superfund Programs- 50-
      State Study.
      See 0447
      CERCLA (Comprehensive Environmental Re-
      sponse,  Compensation and  Liability  Act)
      Compliance with Other Laws Manual: Part 2.
      Clean Air Act and Other Environmental  Stat-
      utes and State Requirements.
      See 0413
      Cleaning Up the Nation's Waste Sites:  Mar-
      kets and Technology Trends
      See 0132
  STATUTES
      CERCLA   (Comprehensive   Environmental
      Response,  Compensation and Liability  Act)
      Compliance with Other Laws Manual: Part 2.
      Clean Air Act and Other Environmental Stat-
      utes and State Requirements
      See 0413
  STRATEGIC PLANNING
      Superfund Strategic Plan and Implementa-
      tion Strategy Fiscal Year 1994.
      See 0126
      Superfund Strategic Plan and Implementa-
      tion  Strategy  Rscal  Year 1994:  Office  and
      Division Plans.
      See 0127
 STRIPPERS
     Air/Superfund National  Technical Guidance
     Study Series. Air Stripper Design Manual
     See 1374
     Air/Superfund National Technical Guidance
     Study Series. Comparisons of Air Stripper
     Simulations and Field Performance Data
     See 1376
     Control of Air Emissions from Superfund Air
     Strippers  at Superfund  Groundwater Sites.
     See 1399
     Tech Trends (Number 8).
     See 1328
 STRIPPING
     Toxic Treatments  'In-situ'  Steam/Hot-Air
     Stripping Technology. Applications Analysis
     Report.
     See 1545
 STRUCTURED TRAINING AND EVALUATION
 PROGRAM
     CERCLA Implementation of Inspector Train-
     ing Requirements for OSCs/RPMs at the In-
     termediate Level in STEP and First-Line Su-
     pervisors.
     See 0517
 STYRENE
     Health Effects Assessment for Styrene
     See 1046
 SUBCONTRACTS
     Contracting and Subcontracting Guide to the
    Superfund Program.
    See 0023
 SUBJECT INDEX TERMS
    Hazardous Waste Superfund Collection: Da-
    tabase Thesaurus.
    See 0138
SUBSURFACE INVESTIGATIONS
    Aseptic Sampling of Unconsolidated Heaving
    Soils in Saturated Zones.
    See 1489
SUMMA CANISTERS
    Compendium of ERT Air Sampling Proce-
    dures.
    See 0901
SUPERFUND
    Abstract Proceedings: Superfund Technical
    Support Project General Meeting.  Held  in
    Athens, Georgia on December 3-6, 1990
    See 1187
    Abstracts of Phase 1 and Phase 2  Awards:
    Small  Business Innovation  Research  Pro-
    gram 1991.
    See 0016
    Accelerated Response at NPL Sites Guid-
    ance (Superfund Management Review: Rec-
    ommendation No. 22).               L
    See 0082
    Accelerating  Potentially  Responsible Party
    Remedial Design Starts: Implementing the
    30-Day Study.
    See 0509
    Accessing  Federal Data Bases for Contami-
    nated Site Clean-Up Technologies.
    See 1188
   Accessing  the $50 Million Set-Aside in the
    Remedial Action Budget for Quick Response
   at National Priorities List Sites.
   See 1082
   Additional Guidance on  'Worst  Sites' and
   'NPL Caliber Sites' to Assist in SACM Imple-
   mentation.
   See 0083
   Administrative Guidance for the FIT to ARCS
   (FIT/ARCS) Transition.
   See 0017
   Administrative Order on Consent for Reme-
   dial  Investigations/Feasibility Study.
   See 0510
   Administrative Penalty Procedures.
   See 0511
   Advancing the Use of  Treatment Technol-
   ogies for Superfund Remedies.
   See 1191
   Air/Superfund  National Technical Guidance
   Study Series. Air Stripper Design Manual.
   See 1374
   Air/Superfund  National Technical Guidance
   Study Series:  Applicability of  Open Path
   Monitors for Superfund.
   See  1375
   Air/Superfund  National Technical Guidance
   Study Series: Compilation  of Information  on
   Real-Time Air Monitoring for Use at Super-
  fund Sites.
  See  1377
  Air/Superfund National Technical Guidance
  Study Series. Contingency Plans at Super-
  fund  Sites Using Air Monitoring.
  See  1378
  Air/Superfund National Technical  Guidance
  Study Series. Database of Emission Rate
  Measurement Projects.
  See 1379
  Air/Superfund National Technical Guidance
  Study Series. Emission Factors for  Super-
  fund  Remediation Technologies.
  See 1381
  Air/Superfund National Technical Guidance
  Study Series: Estimation of Air Impacts for
  Air Stripping of Contaminated Water.
  See 1382
  Air/Superfund National Technical Guidance
  Study Series: Estimation of Air Impacts for
  Soil Vapor Extraction (SVE) Systems
  See 1383
  Air Superfund National Technical Guidance
  Study Series. Estimation of Air Impacts for
  the Excavation of Contaminated Soil.
  See 1384
  Air/Superfund National Technical  Guidance
  Study Series:  Estimation of  Air  Impacts from
  Area  Sources of Particulate  Matter  Emis-
  sions  at Superfund Sites.
  See 1385
   Air/Superfund  National Technical Guidance
   Study Series:  Evaluation of Short-Term Air
   Action Levels for Superfund Sites.
   See 1386
   Air/Superfund  National Technical Guidance
   Study Series. Guideline for Predictive Base-
   line Emissions  Estimation Procedures for Su-
   perfund Sites.
   See 1387
   Air/Superfund  National Technical Guidance
   Study Series.  Models for  Estimating  Air
   Emission Rates  from  Superfund Remedial
   Actions.
   See 1388
   Air  Superfund  National  Technical Guidance
   Study Series. Screening Procedures for Esti-
   mating the Air Impacts  of Incineration at Su-
   perfund Sites.
   See 1389
   Air/Superfund National Technical Guidance
   Study Series. Volume  1.  Overview of Air
   Pathway Assessments  for Superfund Sites
   (Revised).
   See 1391
   Air/Superfund National Technical Guidance
   Study Series. Volume 4. Guidance for Ambi-
   ent  Air Monitoring at Superfund  Sites  (Re-
   vised).
   See 1393
   Alternative Biological Treatment  Processes
   for Remediation of Creosote-and PCP-Con-
   taminated Materials: Bench-Scale Treatabil-
   ity Studies.
   See 1418
   Amendment to Historical Definitions of NPL
   Deletion Start and Completion Dates.
   See 0335
   Analysis of State  Superfund  Programs: 50-
   State Study.
   See 0447
   Analysis of State  Superfund  Programs: 50-
   State Study, 1990 Update.
   See 0448
  Analysis of State  Superfund  Programs: 50-
  State Study. 1991 Update.
  See 0449
  Analysis of Treatability  Data for Soil and
  Debris: Evaluation of Land Ban  Impact  on
  Use of Superfund Treatment  Technologies.
  See 1488
  Applicability of Land Disposal Restrictions to
  RCRA and CERCLA Ground Water Treat-
  ment  Reinjection  Superfund  Management
  Review: Recommendation No.  26.
  See 1430
  Application of a Water Quality Assessment
  Modeling System at a Superfund Site.
  See 1573
  Applications Analysis Report: SITE Program,
 • CF Systems Organics  Extraction System,
  New Bedford, Massachusetts.
  See 1196
  Approval of Long Term Contracting Strategy
  for   Superfund  (Superfund   Management
  Review: Recommendation E.2).
  See 0018
  ARAR's Q's and A's. Compliance with the
  Toxicity Characteristics Rule. Part 1.
  See 0396
  ARARs Fact Sheet:  Compliance  with  the
  Clean Air Act and Associated Air Quality Re-
  quirements.
  See 0397
 ARARs Q's and A's.
 See 0398
. ARARS Q's and  A's: Compliance  with Fed-
 eral Water Quality Criteria.
 See 0399
                                                                                                                             SU-85

-------
 SOPERFUND
                                                        SUBJECT INDEX
    ARARs Q's and A's Compliance with New
   !! SOWA National Primary Drinking Water Reg-
   I lilailons for Organic and Inorganic Chemi-
   ! cal*.     '      	           	
    See 0400
    ARARs Q's and A's: General Policy, RCRA,
    CWA,  SDWA,  Post-ROb  Information,  and
   	Contingent Waivers.
    See 0401
    ARARs Q's and  A's:  State Ground-Water
    Anlfdogradatlon Issues.
    Sea 0402
    ARARs Q's and  A's:  The Fund-Balancing
    Waiver.      	lll"l="   "	
    SM 0403
   |M Arbitration  Proceduresfor Small Superfund
    Cost'Recovery CTaims'^	
    See 0512
    ARCS  Construction Contract  Modification
    Procedures,
    See 0020
    ARCS Work Assignment Management: Field
     Guide.
     See 0021
     Assessing  Potential  Indoor Air  Impacts for
   I  Suporfund   Sites.  Air/Superfund National
   	  technical Guidance Study Series.
     S««1395
   -,'. AssossJng  Reports of Continuous Releases
   "•' of Hazardous Substances: A Guide for EPA
   "'•' Regions.
   	'SM.114.2
   I" Assessing  Sites under  SACM: Interim Guid-
     ance.  Volume 1,  Number  4,  Deocember
     1902.
     See 0084
     Assessment o( Tentatively Identified Com-
     pounds in  Superfund Samples.
     Sea 1199
     Assurance of Hazardous Waste Capacity,
     Guidance  to  State  Officials. Assistance in
     Fulfilling   the  Requirements of CERCLA
     104(o)(9).
     See 0129
     ATSDR    Health   Consultations   under
     CERCLA.
     S«e1018
     Audit  Management  Process.   Reference
     Guide.
     See 0085
     Audits and the Superfund Program Manager.
     See 0086
     Audits and the Superfund Program Manager.
     See 0087
     Authority  to  Use CERCLA  to  Provide En-
     forcement Funding Assistance to States.
     See 0450
     Authorization for Regional Administrators to
     Approve  Consistency  Exemptions at  NPL
     Sites.
     S000998
     AWD  Technologies Integrated AquaDetox
      (Trade Name)/SVE Technology: Applications
      Analysis Report.
      Sao 1202
      Basic Concepts  of Contaminant Sorption at
      Hazardous  Waste Sites  (Ground  Water
      Issue).
      Sea 1431
      BEN:  A Model  to  Calculate the Economic
      Benefits of Nonoompliance. User's Manual
      (Revised).
      Sea 1205
      Bfotilohesis  (Trade Name) Soil  Washing
      Technology:  Innovative  Technology Evalua-
      tion Report.
      See 1490
      Btotogteal Assessment of Toxicity Caused by
      Chemical Constituents Eluted from Site Soils
      Collected at the Drake  Chemical Superfund
      Site, Lock Haven, Clinton Co., Pennsylvania.
      See 1491
                           Bioremediation Resource Guide and Biore-
                           mediation Resource Matrix.
                           See 1425
                           CASHOUT Model: Calculates Current Value
                           of Superfund Cleanup Costs (Version 1.2)
                           (for Microcomputers).
                           See 1208
                           CASHOUT User's Manual for Superfund.
                           See 0515
                           CERCLA Community Relations Mailing Lists.
                           See 0451
                           CERCLA Compliance  with  Other  Environ-
                           mental Statutes.
                           See 0404
                           CERCLA  Compliance  with  Other  Laws
                           Manual: CERCLA Compliance with State Re-
                           quirements.
                           See 0405
                           CERCLA  Compliance  with  Other  Laws
                           Manual: CERCLA Compliance with the CWA
                           and SDWA.
                           See 0406
                           CERCLA  Compliance  with  Other  Laws
                           Manual: Guide to Manual.
                           See 0407
                           CERCLA  Compliance  with  Other   Laws
                           Manual: Overview  of  ARARs -  Focus  on
                           ARAR Waivers.
                           See 0408
                           CERCLA  Compliance  with  Other   Laws
                            Manual:  RCRA ARARS-Focus on Closure
                            Requirements.
                           See 0410
                            CERCLA  Compliance  with  Other   Laws
                            Manual: Summary  and Part 2. CAA, TSCA,
                            and Other Statutes.
                            See 0411
                            CERCLA Compliance with the RCRA Toxici-
                            ty Characteristics (TC) Rule: Part 2.
                            See 0412
                            CERCLA  Enforcement Policy Compendium
                            Update.
                            See 0516
                            CERCLA Implementation of Inspector Train-
                            ing Requirements for OSCs/RPMs at the In-
                            termediate Level in STEP and First-Line Su-
                            pervisors.
                            See 0517
                            CERCLA Implementation of the Training  Re-
                            quirements  of EPA Order  3500.1. Inspector
                            Training.
                            See 0518
                            CERCLA   Notifications:   Emergency   Re-
                            sponse  Notification  System  (ERNS)  Fact
                            Sheet.
                            See 0926
                            CERCLA Off-Site Policy - Eligibility of Facili-
                            ties in Assessment Monitoring.
                            See 0414
                            CERCLA Off-Site Policy: Providing Notice to
                            Facilities.
                            See 0415
                            CERCLA Removal Actions at Methane Re-
                            lease Sites.
                            See 0416
                            CERCLA   Site   Discharges  to  POTWS
                            CERCLA Site Sampling Program: Detailed
                            Data  Report.
                            See 1575
                            CERCLA Site Discharges to POTWS Treat-
                            ability Manual.
                            See 1577
                             CERCLA/Superfund Orientation Manual.
                             See 0130
                             CERCLA Waste Capacity Assurance.
                             See 0131
                             CERCLIS Characterization Project: National
                             Results.
                             See 0001
                             CERCLIS Characterization  Project: Region 1
                             Results.
                             See 0002
CERCLIS Characterization Project: Region 2
Results.
See 0003
CERCLIS Characterization Project: Region 3
Results.
See 0004
CERCLIS Characterization Project: Region 4
Results.
See 0005
CERCLIS Characterization Project: Region 5
Results.
See 0006
CERCLIS Characterization Project: Region 6
Results.
See 0007
CERCLIS Characterization Project: Region 7
Results.
See 0008
CERCLIS Characterization Project: Region 8
Results.
See 0009
CERCLIS Characterization Project: Region 9
Results.
See 0010
CERCLIS  Characterization  Project:  Region
10 Results.
See 0011
CERCLIS  Data  Handling  Support  Policy
Statement.
See 0013
CERCLIS Listing.
See 0014
CERCLIS - WasteLAN - CleanLAN.
See 0015
Characterization  Protocol  for   Radioactive
 Contaminated Soils.
See 1494
Chemfix Technologies,  Inc. Solidification/
 Stabilization  Process.  Application  Analysis
 Report.
 See 1551
 Chemical  Dehalogenation Treatability Stud-
 ies under CERCLA: An Overview.
 See 1153
 Chemical Dehalogenation Treatability Stud-
 ies under CERCLA: An Overview.
 See 1209
 Chemical Enhancements to Pump-and-Treat
 Remediation. Ground Water Issue.
 See 1434
 Chemical Oxidation Treatment.  Engineering
 Bulletin.
 See 1211
 Chemical    Waste    Management,   Inc.
 PO*WW*ER  (Trade   Name)  Evaporation-
 Catalytic Oxidation Technology. Technology
 Evaluation Report. Volume 1.
 See 1213
 Chemical    Waste    Management,   Inc.
 PO*WW*ER  (Trade  Name)  Evaporation-
 Catalytic  Oxidation Technology. Technology
 Evalution Report. Volume 2.
 See 1214
 Citizen's Guide to Air Sparging.
 See 0452
 Citizen's Guide to Bioventing.
 See 0453
 Citizen's Guide to In  situ Soil Flushing.
 See 0456
 Citizen's Guide  to  Innovative Treatment
 Technologies   for   Contaminated   Soils,
 Sludges, Sediments and Debris.
 See 0457
 Citizen's Guide to Using Indigenous  and Ex-
 ogenous Microorganisms in Bioremediation.
 See 0461
 Citizens' Guidance Manual for the Technical
 Assistance Grant Program.
  See 0462
   SU-86
,
 iKiBIII  ,i ,j. ,.<;  .. ' .....  ..Jili.  ;.,.;.    ,.  .      : si1,.,., •; ( '  , . ......
.1111,^^                   ...... ill ....... iil ..... jj ......... .jijij ........... iliiliilir fcii ...... mi ....... tlMiliiii....!.!!;.
                                                                          ...    jit  i,. ...... i ., .ilid ii< (. ii ...... jil.  -I,;;.; ,:» i,,,, •('.'
                                                                                 ..... iiliiiitii ...... ;.:, ..... .illM^^^          ..... lUiiiiiHlnili, .....

-------
                                                       SUBJECT INDEX
                                                                                                                      SUPERFUND
   Citizens' Guidance Manual for the Technical
   Assistance Grant Program
   See 0463
   Clarification of Delegation to Approve Con-
   sistency Exemptions at NPL Sites
   See 0336
   Cleanup Information Bulletin  Board  System
   Users  Guide. (CLU-IN: Cleanup Information
   Bulletin Board).
   See 1215
   Closing the NPL  Book under the Oriqinal
   HRS.
   See 0337
   Commencement  Bay  Nearshore/Tideflats
   Feasibility Study. Development of  Sediment
   Cleanup Goals.
   See 1578
   Commencement  Bay  Nearshore/Tideflats
   Feasibility Study. Executive Summary
   See 1579
   Commencement  Bay  Nearshore/Tideflats
   Feasibility Study. Volume 1
  See 1580
  Commencement  Bay  Nearshore/Tideflats
  Feasibility Study. Volume 2. Appendices
  See 1581
  Community  Relations during  Enforcement
  Activities and Development of the  Adminis-
  trative Record.
  See 0466
  Community Relations in Superfund: A Hand-
  book.
  See 0467
  Community Relations: Use of Senior Envi-
  ronmental Employees in Superfund (Super-
  fund Management Review: Recommendation
  43.K.L).
  See 0088
  Comparative Analysis of Remedies Selected
  in the Superfund Program during FY 87 FY
  88 and FY 89.
  See 0519
  Compendium  of  ERT Air  Sampling Proce-
  dures.
  See 0901
  Compendium of ERT  Field Analytical Proce-
  dures.
  See 0902
 Compendium of ERT Groundwater Sampling
  Procedures.
 See 0903
 Compendium of ERT Soil Sampling and Sur-
 face Geophysics Procedures.
 See 0904
 Compendium  of  ERT Surface Water and
 Sediment Sampling Procedures
 See 0905
 Compendium of ERT Toxicity Testing Proce-
 dures.
 See 0906
 Compendium of  ERT  Waste Sampling  Pro-
 cedures.
 See 0907
 Compendium of Federal Facilities Directives
 1984 and 1985.
 See 0896
 Compendium of Good Ideas: Models  of Suc-
 cess and Lessons Learned. Volume 1 Hiah-
 lights.
 See 0133
 Compendium of Good Ideas:  Models of Suc-
 cess  and  Lessons   Learned.  Volume  2
 Source Book.
 See 0134
 Compendium  of  NPL  Listing Policies  and
 Procedures, 1982 to 1985
See 0338
Compendium of ROD Language for FY 1993
Focus Areas.
See 1083
   Compliance with Third Third Requirements
   Under the LDRs. Superfund LDR Guide No.
   8.
   See 0418
   Conducting  Non-Time-Critical Removal Ac-
   tions under CERCLA.
   See 0999
   Conducting  Remedial  Investigations/Feasi-
   bility Studies for CERCLA Municipal Landfill
   Sites.
   See 1084
   Congressional  Limits for FY 92 Alternative
   Remedial Contracting Strategy (ARCS) Pro-
   gram Management Costs.
   See 0022
   Consent  Orders and  the Reimbursement
   Provision Under Section 106(b) of CERCLA.
   See 0520
   Consideration of ARARs during Removal Ac-
   tions.
   See 0419
   Consideration  of  RCRA  Requirements  in
   Performing CERCLA Responses  at Mining
  Waste Sites.
  See 0420
  Considerations  in  Ground  Water  Remedi-
  ation at Superfund Sites.
  See 1436
  Considerations  in  Ground-Water  Remedi-
  ation at Superfund Sites and RCRA Facili-
  ties: Update.
  See 1437
  Consultation  on  Records  of  Decision
  (RODS) for Containment-Only Remedies.
  See 0521
  Continuous  Release-Emergency  Response
  Notification System and Priority Assessment
  Model: Model Documentation
  See 1143
  Continuous Release-Emergency  Response
  Notification System and Priority Assessment
  Model: User's Manual for EPA Regions
  See 1144
  Continuous Release - Emergency Response
  Notification System.  User's  Manual  for In-
  dustry.
  See 1145
  Contracting and  Subcontracting Guide to the
  Superfund Program.
 See 0023
 Control of Air Emissions from Superfund Air
 Strippers at Superfund  Groundwater Sites.
 See 1399
 Control  of  Air  Emissions from Superfund
 Sites.
 See 1400
 Control Technologies  for Defunct lead Bat-
 tery Recycling Sites: Overview and Recent
 Developments. Volume 3.
 See 1220
 Coordination of  EPA  and State  Actions in
 Cost Recovery.
 See 0522
 Cost of Remedial Action Model
 See 1085
 Cost  of  Remedial Actions (CORA)  Model:
 Overview and Applications.
 See 1086
 Cost  Recovery  Actions/Statute  of  Limita-
 tions.
 See 0523
 Cost Recovery Actions under CERCLA.
 See 0524
 Cost Recovery Referrals.
 See 0525
 Counting  State-Lead Enforcement NPL Sites
 Toward the CERCLA Section 116(e) Reme-
 dial Action Start Mandate.
 See 0468
Criminal Investigations and  the Superfund
 Program.
See 0469
   Criteria for Choosing  Indicator Species for
   Ecological  Risk Assessments  at Superfund
   Sites (90-6402).
   See 1224
   CWM  PO*WW*ER (Trade  Name) Evapora-
   tion-Catalytic Oxidation Technology: Applica-
   tions Analysis Report.
   See 1225
   Data Quality Objectives Decision Error Fea-
   sibility Trials  (DEFT)  Beta Version  1.01.
   User's Guide.
   See 0979
   Data Quality  Objectives for Remedial  Re-
   sponse Activities: Development Process. Ex-
   ample  Scenario:  RI/FS Activities at a  Site
   with Contaminated Soils and Ground Water.
   See 0980
   Data Quality Objectives Process for Super-
   fund.
   See 0981
   Data Quality Objectives Process for Super-
  fund.
  See 0982
  Data Quality Objectives Process for Super-
  fund: Interim Final Guidance.
  See 0983
  Data Quality Objectives Process for  Super-
  fund: Workbook.
  See 0984
  Debarment and Suspension.
  See 0470
  Decentralization of Superfund Bottle Reposi-
  tory Functions.
  See 0985
  Demonstration  of  a  Trial Excavation  at the
  McColl Superfund Site.
  See 1226
  Design Considerations for Ambient Air Moni-
  toring at Superfund Sites. Engineering Bulle-
  tin.
  See 1402
  Determination of Imminent and  Substantial
  Endangerment for Removal Actions.
  See 1000
  Determining  Soil Response  Action  Levels
  Based on Potential Contaminant  Migration to
  Ground Water: A Compendium of Examples.
 See 1497
 Development  of  Emerging   Technologies
 within the SITE  Program.
 See 1231
 Developments  in  Chemical  Treatment  of
 Contaminated Soil.
 See 1499
 Discharge  of Wastewater  from CERCLA
 Sites into POTWS.
 See 0421
 Distribution of DRAFT Soil Screening  Level
 Guidance.
 See 1500
 DuPont/Oberlin  Microfiltration Technology.
 Applications Analysis Report.
 See 1584
 Early Action  and  Long-Term Action  under
 SACM: Interim Guidance, Volume 1, Number
 2, December 1992.
 See 0089
 ECO Update: Ecological Assessment of Su-
 perfund  Sites.  An  Overview.  Volume  1,
 Number 2, December 1991.
 See 1019
 ECO Update: The Role of BTAGs  in Ecologi-
 cal Assessment. Volume  1, Number 1,  Sep-
 tember 1991.
 See 1020
 ECO  Update. Volume 1, Number 3.  The
 Role  of Natural  Resource Trustees  in  the
Superfund Process.
See 1021
                                                                                                                        SU-87

-------
SUPERFUND
    ECO Update. Volume 1, Number 4. Develop-
    ing a Work Soop«  for Ecological Assess-
    monts.
    "S«*1022
    Ecosystem Effects of Superfund.  National
    Priority List-Sites In Industrial Landscapes: A
    Framework for Policy Decisions.
    See 0135
    Effect of  OSHA's  Bloodborne  Pathogens
    Standard on Hazardous Waste Cleanup Ac-
    tivities.
    Sea 1026
    Emefgancy  Rospondera   Agreements  for
    "fJjod-Lsad Remedial Actions.
    i;§fa'WJ   ',1   'II   I"   "    .
    Emergency Response Notification System.
    Seo 0927
    Emerging  technologies: Bio-Recovery Sys-
    tems Removal and Recovery  of Metal Ions
    ' from Grouodwater.
    Soe 1439
    Emerging Technologies: Bio-Recovery Sys-
    ""1«ms Romoval and Recovery  of Metal Ions
    from  Grourtdwater. Appendices.
    Soa1440
    Errwging Technology Report Metals Treat-
    Storjlat Suporfund Sites by Absorptive Filtra-
    JSto,".:   ,':,   :"::   ::::   :
    See 1232
     Endangefment Assessment Guidance.
    Sea 0527
    !" Endangerment Assessment Guidance.
     Soa0528
     Endangwmont Assessment Handbook.
     Soa 0529
    a Endartgerment Assessment Handbook.
     SMI 0530
    	Enforcement  Project  Management  Hand-
    ,.890533
     Enforcement  under  SACM:  Interim  Guid-
     ance, Volume 1, Number 3, December 1992.
     Sea 0090
     Engineering Bulletin: Air Pathway Analysis.
     Sea 1404
     Engineering Bulletin: Pyrolysis Treatment.
     Sea 1234
    ..... Engineering Bulletin: Slurry Walls.
     Soa 1235
     Engineering Bulletin: Technology  Preselec-
     tion Data Requirements.
     Sco 1405
     Enhancing  State   Superfund  Capabilities:
     Nine-State Study.
     Sea 0471
     Ensuring the Adequacy of Cost Share Provi-
     sions In Superfund State Contracts.
    "" ...... See 0472 .........................................
      Entry and Continued Access under CERCLA.
     Sea 0534
      Environmental     Asbestos    Assessment
      Manual. Superfund Method for the Determi-
      nation of Asbestos In Ambient Air. Part  1.
     ''    .....       .....   .......... '"
              ,,,      .                   ,
    It Sea 1027
      Environmental     Asbestos    Assessment
      Manual. Superfund Method for the Determi-
      nation  of Asbestos in Ambient Air. Part 2.
      Technical Background Document
      Soe 1028
      Environmental Characteristics of EPA, NRC,
      and DOS Sites  Contaminated with Radioac-
      tive Substances,
      See 1237
    ,"„ EPA Interim Guidance on Indemnification of
    :::! Superfund   Response  Action  Contractors
      Under Section 1 1 9 of SARA.
      Sea 0536
      EPA/Navy CERCLA  Remedial Action Tech-
      nology Guide,
      Soa 1241
                                                        SUBJECT INDEX
EPA Oversight of Remedial Designs and Re-
medial Actions Performed by PRPs.
See 1124
EPA/U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Payment
Process,  Direct  Cite/Revised  Reimburse-
ment Methods.
See 1125
EPA/USACE Payment Process: Direct Cite/
Revised Reimbursement Methods.
See 1126
Establishing  Work  Zones  at Uncontrolled
Hazardous Waste Sites.
See 0908
Estimating  Potential  for  Occurrence  of
DNAPL at Superfund Sites.
See 1442
Estimating VOC  Emissions from Superfund
Sites  in the Houston-Galveston Texas Area.
(NNEMS Project  No. 1302).
See 1406
Estimation of Air Impacts for Bioventing Sys-
tems  Used at Superfund Sites. Air/Super-
fund  National  Technical  Guidance  Study
Series.
See 1407
Estimation  of Air Impacts for Solidification
and Stabilization Processes Used at Super-
fund Sites. Air/Superfund National Technical
Guidance Study Series.
See 1408
 Estimation of Air Impacts for Thermal  De-
 sorption Units Used at Superfund Sites. Air/
 Superfund  National  Technical   Guidance
 Study Series.
 See 1409
 Evaluating Mixed Funding Settlements under
 CERCLA.
 See 0537
 Evaluation of Alternative Treatment Technol-
 ogies for CERCLA Soils and Debris (Summa-
 ry of Phase 1 and Phase 2).
 See  1504
 Evaluation of, and  Additional Guidance on,
 Issuance of  Unilateral Administrative Orders
 (UAOs) for RD/RA.
 See  0538
 Evaluation of Cleanup Levels for  Remedial
 Action at CERCLA  (Comprehensive Environ-
 mental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
 ity Act) Sites Based on a  Review of  EPA
 (Environmental  Protection Agency)  Records
 of Decision.
 See 1245
 Evaluation of Commercially-Available Porta-
 ble Gas Chromatographs.
 See 1478
 Evaluation of Ground-Water Extraction Rem-
 edies. Volume 2. Case Studies 1-19.
 See 1446
  Evaluation of Ground-Water Extraction Rem-
  edies. Volume  3.  General  Site Data:  Data
  Base Reports.
  See 1447
  Evaluation  of  Soil  Venting  Application.
  Ground Water issue.
  See 1505
  Evaluation of Terrestrial Indicators for Use in
  Ecological  Assessments   at   Hazardous
  Waste Sites.
  See 1249
  Evaluation of the Likelihood of DNAPL Pres-
  ence at NPL Sites: National Results.
  See 1448
  Evaluation  of Unsaturated/Valdose  Zone
  Models for Superfund Sites.
  See 1449
  Exemptions from the Statutory Limits on  Re-
  moval Actions.
  See 1002
  Exercising  Flexibility through the  Superfund
  Accelerated Cleanup Model (SACM).
  See 0091
Expanded Civil Judicial Referral Procedures.
See 0539
Expansion of Direct Referral of Cases to the
Department of Justice.
See 0540
Expectations  for  Full  Implementation  of
SACM.
See 0092
Expedited Response Actions.
See 1003
Expediting Remedial Construction.
See 1127
Extending the Tracking of Analytical  Serv-
ices  to Potentially Responsible Party-Lead
Superfund Sites (Supplemental Guidance on
OSWER Directive 9240.0-2A).
See 0986
Facilitated Transport. Series of Issue Papers
(3rd).
See 1451
FACT BOOK: National Priorities  List  under
the Original Hazard Ranking  System,  1981-
 1991.
 See 0340
 Feasibility Study: Detailed Analysis of Reme-
 dial Action Alternatives.
 See 1088
 Feasibility  Study:  Development and Screen-
 ing of Remedial Action Alternatives.
 See 1089
 Field Certification Tracking System (FCTS).
 User's Guide. Version 2.1.
 See 0909
 Field Standard Operating Procedures for Air
 Surveillance F.S.O.P. No. 8.
 See 0910
 Field Standard Operating Procedures for Es-
 tablishing Work Zones (F.S.O.P. 6).
 See  0911
 Field Standard Operating   Procedures  for
 Preparation of a Site  Safety Plan F.S.O.P.
 No. 9.
 See 0912
 Field Standard Operating Procedures for the
 Decontamination  of  Response  Personnel
 F.S.O.P. No. 7.
 See 0913
 Final EPA Policy on the Inclusion of Environ-
 mental  Auditing  Provisions  in Enforcement
 Settlements.
 See 0541
 Final Guidance  on Administrative Records
 for Selecting CERCLA Response Actions.
 See 0473
  Final Guidance  on Implementation  of the
  'Consistency1  Exemption to  the Statutory
  Limits on  Removal Actions.
  See 1004
  Final Guidance on Preparing Waste-In Lists
  and Volumetric Rankings for Release to Po-
  tentially Responsible  Parties (PRPs) under
  CERCLA ('Waste-In' Guidance).
  See 0542
  Final Policy on Setting RI/FS Priorities.
  See 1090
  Forurn Focus, August 1993.
  See 0136
  Forum   on  Innovative  Hazardous Waste
  Treatment  Technologies:   Domestic   and
  International.  Held in Atlanta,  Georgia  on
  June 19-21,1989. Abstract  Proceedings.
  See 1252
  Funding  of State Enforcement Related  Ac-
  tivities.
  See 0474
  Further Direction  on Implementing  the  Su-
  perfund Accelerated Cleanup Model  (SACM).
  See 0093
   SU-88

-------
                                                       SUBJECT INDEX
                                                                                                                        SUPERFUND
   Furthering the Use of Innovative Treatment
   Technologies in OSWER Programs
   See 1255
   Furthering the Use of Innovative Treatment
   Technologies in OSWER Programs
   See 1256
   FY 1992 Themes for Regional Coordination
   to Support Continuous Improvements of Su-
   perfund's Remedial Program
   See 1091
   Getting Ready: Scoping the RI/FS.
   See 1092
   Ground-Water Issue: Characterizing Soils for
   Hazardous Waste Site Assessments
   See 1455
   Ground-Water  Issue: Potential Sources of
   Error in Ground-Water Sampling at Hazard-
   ous Waste  Sites.
   See 1456
   Ground-Water  Issue: The  Effects of Well
   Casing Material on Ground Water-Qualitv
   See 1457
   Ground Water Sampling for Metals Analyses
   Superfund Ground Water Issue
   See 1459
   Guidance for Capacity Assurance Planning.
   Capacity Planning Pursuant to CERCLA Sec-
   tion 104(c)(9).
  See 0137
  Guidance for Coordinating ATSDR  Health
  Assessment Activities  with  the  Superfund
  Remedial Process.
  See 1029
  Guidance for Data Useability in Risk Assess-
  ment.
  See 1030
  Guidance for Data Useability in Risk Assess-
  ment.
  See 1031
  Guidance for Data Useability in Risk Assess-
  ment. Interim Report.
  See 1032
  Guidance for Data Useability in Risk Assess-
  ment (Part A).
  See 1033
  Guidance for Environmental Priorities Initia-
  tive (EPI) Facilities in the Superfund Pre-Re-
  medial Program.
  See 0341
  Guidance for Federal Facilities on Release
  Notification  Requirements  under CERCLA
  and SARA Title III.
  See 0898
  Guidance  for Organizing  ARCS  Contract
  Files.
 See 0025
 Guidance for Performing Preliminary Assess-
 ments under CERCLA.
 See 0342
 Guidance for Performing  Site Inspections
 under CERCLA.
 See 0343
 Guidance of the Use of Stipulated Penalties
 in Hazardous Waste Consent Decrees
 See 0544
 Guidance on Applicability  of  EPA Order
 3500.1 to CERCLA  Staff.
 See 0545
 Guidance on  Applying the Data Quality Ob-
 jectives Process for Ambient Air Monitoring
 Around Superfund Sites (Stage 3)
 See 0987
 Guidance on  Applying the Data Quality Ob-
 jectives Process for Ambient Air Monitoring
 Around  Superfund Sites  (Stages 1  and  2)
 See 0988
 Guidance on  CERCLA Section  106 Judicial
Actions.
See 0546
Guidance on  CERCLA Settlements with De
Micromis Waste Contributors
See 0547
   Guidance on CERCLA 106(a) Unilateral Ad-
   ministrative Orders for Remedial  Designs
   and Remedial Actions.
   See 0548
   Guidance on  Conducting  Non-Time-Critical
   Removal Actions under CERCLA.
   See 1005
   Guidance on Documenting Decisions Not to
   Take Cost Recovery Actions
   See 0549
   Guidance on Drafting Consent Decrees in
   Hazardous Waste Cases
   See 0550
   Guidance on EPA Oversight of Remedial De-
   signs and Remedial Actions Performed by
   Potentially Responsible Parties
   See 1128
   Guidance  on Expediting  Remedial Design
   and Remedial Action.
   See 1129
   Guidance on Federal Superfund Liens
   See 0551
   Guidance on Implementation of the 'Contrib-
   ute to Remedial Performance' Provision
   See 1093
   Guidance on Implementation of the Super-
  fund Accelerated  Cleanup  Model (SACM)
  under CERCLA and the NCP.
  See 0094
  Guidance on Landowner Liability under Sec-
  tion 107(a)(1) of CERCLA,  De Minimis Set-
  tlements  under  Section   122(g)(1)(B)  of
  CERCLA, and Settlements with Prospective
  Purchasers of Contaminated Property.
  See 0552
  Guidance on  Oversight of Potentially  Re-
  sponsible Party Remedial Investigations and
  Feasibility Studies. Volume 1
  See 1094
  Guidance on Oversight of Potentially Re-
  sponsible Parry Remedial Investigations and
  Feasibility Studies. Volume 2.  Appendices
  See 1095
  Guidance on Oversight of  PRP Performed
  RD/RA.
  See 1130
  Guidance on Premium Payments in CERCLA
  Settlements.
  See 0553
  Guidance on  Preparing  Waste-in Lists  and
  Volumetric Rankings for  Release to Poten-
 tially  Responsible  Parties  (PRPs)  under
 CERCLA.
 See 0554
 Guidance  on  Procedures   for Submitting
 CERCLA Section 106(b)  Reimbursement Pe-
 titions and on EPA Review of Those  Peti-
 tions.
 See 0555
 Guidance on Program  Management Activi-
 ties under ARCS.
 See 0026
 Guidance on Remedial  Actions for Super-
 fund Sites with PCB Contamination.
 See 1260
 Guidance  on Remedial Actions for  Super-
 fund Sites with PCB Contamination
 See 1261
 Guidance  on Setting Priorities for NPL Can-
 didate Sites.
 See 0344
 Guidance  on Site Assessment Cooperative
 Agreements.
 See 0475
 Guidance  Regarding CERCLA Enforcement
against Bankrupt Parties.
See 0556
Guide  for Conducting Treatability Studies
under CERCLA.
See 1154
   Guide  for Conducting Treatability Studies
   under CERCLA.
   See 1155
   Guide  for Conducting Treatability Studies
   under  CERCLA:  Aerobic   Biodegradation
   Remedy Screening.
   See 1156
   Guide  for Conducting Treatability Studies
   under  CERCLA:  Aerobic   Biodegradation
   Remedy Screening. Interim Guidance.
   See 1157
   Guide for Conducting Treatability Studies
   under  CERCLA: Aerobic   Biodegradation
   Remedy Screening.  Quick Reference Fact
   Sheet.
   See 1158
   Guide for  Conducting Treatability  Studies
   under CERCLA: Biodegradation Remedy Se-
   lection. Interim Guidance.
   See 1159
   Guide  for  Conducting  Treatability  Studies
   under CERCLA: Biodegradation Remedy Se-
   lection. Quick Reference Fact  Sheet.
   See 1160
   Guide for  Conducting  Treatability  Studies
  under CERCLA: Chemical Dehalogenation.
  See 1161
  Guide for  Conducting  Treatability  Studies
  under CERCLA:  Chemical Dehalogenation.
  Final Report.
  See 1162
  Guide for Conducting Treatability Studies
  under CERCLA: Soil Vapor Extraction. Quick
  Reference Fact Sheet.
  See 1164
  Guide for Conducting Treatability Studies
  under CERCLA: Soil Washing. Interim Guid-
  ance.
  See 1165
  Guide  for Conducting Treatability Studies
  under CERCLA: Soil Washing: Quick Refer-
  ence Fact Sheet.
  See 1166
  Guide  for  Conducting  Treatability  Studies
  under CERCLA Solvent Extraction. Interim
  Guidance.
  See 1167
  Guide  for  Conducting  Treatability  Studies
  under  CERCLA:  Solvent Extraction Quick
  Reference Fact Sheet.
 See 1168
 Guide  for Conducting  Treatability  Studies
 under CERCLA: Thermal Desorption Quick
 Reference Fact Sheet.
 See 1169
 Guide for Conducting  Treatability Studies
 under   CERCLA:   Thermal    Desorption
 Remedy Selection. Interim Guidance.
 See 1170
 Guide:  Methods for Evaluating the Attain-
 ment of Cleanup  Standards for  Soils and
 Solid Media.
 See 1508
 Guide on  Remedial Actions at Superfund
 Sites with  PCB Contamination.
 See 1262
 Guide on  Remedial Actions for  Contaminat-
 ed Ground Water.
 See 1461
 Guide  to  Addressing  Pre-ROD and  Post-
 ROD Changes.
 See 1096
Guide to Delisting of RCRA Wastes for Su-
perfund Remedial Responses.
See 0422
Guide to Developing Action Memorandums.
See 1097
                                                                                                                         SU-89

-------
SUPERFUND
                                                        SUBJECT INDEX
    Guide to Developing  Superfund  No Action,
    Interim  Action,  and  Contingency  Remedy
    PODS.
    feoa 1098
   , QukJa  to  Developing  Superfund Proposed
   : Plans,
    Sea 1099
   I Guide  to  Discharging CERCLA  Aqueous
    Wastes to Publicly Owned Treatment Works
    (POTWs).
    Soa 0423
    Qulda  to  Management of  Investigation-De-
    rived Wastes.
   :::;"S««634"S ...............
    Guide  to Obtaining No Migration Variances
    for CERCLA Remedial Actions.
   ........... Se«0424 .............................
    Gukte to Pump and Treat Groundwater Re-
   !": mediation Technology.
   • ..... ::         ...................
     Guide to Removal Enforcement.
   !:!: See 1006' ...............................
     Gukte to Selecting Superfund Remedial Ac-
   ;;;; Boris.
     Sea 1100
     Guidelines for Effective Management of the
     Contract Laboratory Program.
     Sw 0027
     Hazard Ranking System  Guidance Manual.
     S«e 0346
     Hazard Ranking System  Guidance Manual.
     See 0347
   .......... Hazardous Waste Operations and Emergen-
     cy   Response:  Uncontrolled   Hazardous
     Waste  Sites and RCRA  Corrective Actions.
     Soa 0425
     Hazardous Waste Operations and Emergen-
     cy Response:  RCRA TSD and  Emergency
     Response Without Regard to Location.
     See  091 4
     Headquarters Support Contract Management
     Procedures.
     See  0029
   i ; Health and Safety Plan (HASP) User's Guide
     O/ersiori 3.0/4.0).
     S««0917
     Health and Safety Roles  and Responsibilities
     at Remedial Sites.
     See 0918
   I!'  Highlights: Superfund Program Management.
     Fiscal Year 1993.
     See 0095
     Homeowners  Exempted  from  Superfund
     Cleanup Costs: National  Policy Overview.
     See 0426
     Hydraulte Fracturing Technology: Technolo-
     gy Evaluation  Report and Application Analy-
      sts Report,
      Sea 1265
      Identification and Compilation of Unsaturat-
      ed/Vadose Zone Models.
     'Se«146'4
      Identification of a Senior Superfund Official
   *''•: for  Addressing Special NPL  Site-Related
      Issues.
      See 0348
      Implementation of the Alternative Remedial
      Contracting Strategy (ARCS)  Task Force
      Recommendations: Transmittal of the Imple-
      mentation Plan.
      Soo 0030
      Implementation of the  Decentralized Con-
      tractor Performance  Evaluation and Award
      Fee Process for Selected Remedial Program
      Contracts.
      See 0031
   :;  , Implementation of the Superfund Alternative
      Remedial   Contracting   Strategy   (ARCS):
      Report  of  the Administrator's  Task Force.
   :   Implementation Plan.
      See 0032
Implementing  the  Deputy  Administrator's
Risk Characterization Memorandum.
See 1056
Importance of Quality for Collection of Envi-
ronmental  Samples. Planning, Implementing,
and  Assessing  Field  Sampling  Quality at
CERCLA Sites.
See 0919
In situ Bioremediation of Contaminated Un-
saturated Subsurface Soils.
See 1509
Initiation of PRP-Financed Remedial Design
in Advance pf Consent Decree Entry (Final).
See 0557
Initiatives  to Streamline the Alternative Re-
medial  Contracting  Strategy (ARCS) Con-
tracts' Award Fee Process.
See 0033
Innovative Methods to Increase Public In-
volvement in  Superfund  Community  Rela-
tions (Superfund Management Review Rec-
ommendation No. 43.A).
See 0097
Innovative Technology:  BEST  Solvent  Ex-
traction Process.
See 1270
innovative Technology:  Glycolate  Dehalo-
genation.
See 1513
 Innovative Technology: In-situ Vitrification.
 See 1514
 Innovative Technology: Slurry-Phase  Biode-
 gradation.
 See 1271
 Innovative Technology: Soil Washing.
 See 1515
 Innovative Treatment Technologies: Over-
 view and  Guide to Information Sources.
 See 1272
 Innovative Treatment Technologies: Semi-
 Annual Status Report (Fourth Edition).
 See 1273
 Innovative Treatment Technologies: Semi-
 Annual Status Report,  January 1991.  First
 Issue.
 See 1274
 Innovative  Treatment Technologies: Semi-
 Annual Status Report. (Third Edition).
 See 1275
  Inorganic Contract  Compliance  Screening
  System (ICCSS) Software (ILM02.1  Version
  4) (for Microcomputers).
  See 0038
  Inorganic Contract   Compliance  Screening
  System  (ICCSS) Software  (ILM02.1 Version
  5) (for Microcomputers).
  See 0039
  Integrated Timeline  for  Superfund Site  Man-
  agement (SMR 5,15).
  See 0098
  Integrating Removal and Remedial  Site As-
  sessment Investigations.
  See 0939
  Interim Cashout Settlement  Procedures.
  See 0558
  Interim CERCLA Settlement Policy.
  See 0559
  Interim Final Guidance Package on  Funding
  CERCLA State Enforcement Actions at NPL
  Sites.
  See 0477
   Interim  Guidance  for Soil  Ingestion Rates.
  See 1057
   Interim  Guidance on Establishing Soil Lead
   Cleanup Levels at  Superfund  Sites. Supple-
   ment to Interim Guidance on Establishing
   Soil  Lead  Cleanup Levels   at Superfund
   Sites.
   See 1516
Interim Guidance on Potentially Responsible
Party Participation in Remedial Investigations
and Feasibility Studies.
See 0561
Interim Guidance on Settlements  with  De
Minimis Waste  Contributors under  Section
122(g)ofSARA.
See 0562
Interim Guidance: Streamlining the CERCLA
Settlement Decision Process.
See 0563
Interim Guidelines for Preparing  Nonbinding
Preliminary Allocations of Responsibility.
See 0564
Interim  Model  CERCLA Section 122(g) (4)
De  Minimis  Waste  Contributor  Consent
Decree and Administrative  Order  on Con-
sent.
See 0565
Interim Policy on Mixed Funding Settlements
Involving  the Preauthorization of States or
Political Subdivisions.
See 0566
 Interim RCRA/CERCLA Guidance on  Non-
Contiguous Sites and On-Site Management
on Waste and Treatment Residue.
 See 0427
 International  Waste Technologies/Geo-Con
 In situ Stabilization/Solidification:  Applica-
 tions Analysis Report.
 See 1557
 Inventory  of  Treatability Study  Vendors.
 Volume 1.
 See 1171
 Involvement of  Superfund Program Manag-
 ers  in   Superfund  Response  Agreement
 Audits.
 See 0099
 Issuance of Administrative Orders for Imme-
 diate Removal Actions.
 See 0567
 Issuance  of  Administrative  Orders Under
 Section 3013 of the Resource Conservation
 and  Recovery Act.
 See 0568
 Issuance of Final Revised Guidance on the
 Use and Issuance of  Administrative Orders
 Under Section  7003 of the Resource  Con-
 servation and Recovery Act (RCRA).
 See 0569
  Issues  Paper  on Radiation Site  Cleanup
  Regulations.
  See 1280
  Land Disposal  Restrictions as Relevant and
  Appropriate Requirements for CERCLA Con-
  taminated Soil and Debris.
  See 0428
  Liability of Corporate Shareholders and Suc-
  cessor  Corporations  for Abandoned  Sites
  Under  the Comprehensive Environmental
  Response, Compensation  and Liability Act.
  See 0570
  Limited-Use Chemical Protective Clothing for
  EPA Superfund Activities.
  See 1058
  Limiting  Lead  Transfers to Private  Parties
  during  Discrete  Phases  of  the  Remedial
   Process.
   See 0571
   Long-Term Contracting Strategy for Super-
   fund.
   See 0042
   Long-Term Contracting Strategy  for Super-
   fund - Implementation.
   See 0043
   SU-90

-------
                                                        SUBJECT INDEX
                                                                                                                           SUPERFUND
 Making  Superfund Documents Available  to
 the Public throughout the  Cleanup Process,
 and Discussing Site Findings and Decisions
 as They are Developed (Superfund Manage-
 ment Review: No. 43 G, H, Q, R, T).
 See 0100
 Management    of    Investigation-Derived
 Wastes during Site Inspections.
 See 0349
 Mandatory  Community  Relations  Training.
 Superfund Management Review Implementa-
 tion Product (Recommendation: No. 43.P(i)).
 See 0103
 Mandatory Training Requirements for OCSs
 and RPMs.
 See 0104
 Measurement  of  Volatile  Organic  Com-
 pounds during Start-Up of  Bioremediation  of
 French  Limited  Superfund Site  in Crosby
 Texas  Using  Wind  Dependent   Whole-Air
 Sampling.
 See 1414
 Membrane  Treatment of Wood  Preserving
 Site Groundwater by SBP Technologies, Inc.
 Applications Analysis Report.
 See 1468
 Methodologies   for   Implementation    of
 CERCLA Section  122(g) (1)  (A) De Minimis
 Waste  Contributor  Settlements   Proposals
 and Agreements.
 See 0572
 Methodology  for  Early De  Minimis Waste
 Contributor Settlements under CERCLA Sec-
 tion 122(g) (1) (A).
 See 0573
 Methodology  for  Evaluating Potential Car-
 cinogenicity in Support of Reportable Quanti-
 ty Adjustments Pursuant to CERCLA Section
 102.
 See 1146
 Minimizing Problems Caused by Staff Turn-
 over (Superfund Management Review: Rec-
 ommendation No. 43,  M, N, O).
 See 0105
 Model Administrative  Order on Consent for
 Removal Actions.
 See 0574
 Model Informational Notice Letter to Local
 Governments.
 See 0575
 Model Litigation  Report  for  CERCLA  Sec-
 tions 106 and 107 and RCRA Section 7003.
 See 0576
 Model Performance Standards for Superfund
 Project Officers, Deputy Project Officers, and
 Work Assignment Managers/Delivery  Order
 Officers.
 See 0045
 Model Statement  of  Work for a  Remedial
 Investigation  and Feasibility Study Conduct-
 ed by Potentially Responsible Parties.
 See 0578
 Model Unilateral Administrative Order for Re-
 moval Response Activities.
 See 0579
 Model  Unilateral Order for Remedial Design
 and Remedial Action.
 See 0580
 Multi-Media   Settlements   of  Enforcement
 Claims.
 See 0581
 Multi-Media   Settlements  of  Enforcement
Claims.
See 0582
 Municipal  Settlements.
See 0583
 NACEPT  Committee  Recommendations to
Administrator Browner.
See 0142
NACEPT Materials for Meeting Held on Sep-
tember 20-21, 1993.
See 0143
 NACEPT Meeting. Held in Crystal  City, Vir-
 ginia on February 11, 1994.
 See 0144
 National Oil and Hazardous Substances Pol-
 lution Contingency Plan (The  NCP).
 See 0146
 National Priorities List Book Set.
 See 0147
 National Priorities List Sites: Alabama.
 See 0148
 National Priorities List Sites: Alabama.
 See 0149
 National Priorities List Sites: Alabama,  1992.
 See 0150
 National Priorities List Sites: Alaska.
 See 0151
 National Priorities List Sites: Alaska.
 See 0152
 National  Priorities List  Sites:  Alaska,  1992.
 See 0153
 National  Priorities   List  Sites:  American
 Samoa, Guam, and the Trust Territories.
 See 0154
 National  Priorities   List  Sites:  American
 Samoa, Guam and Trust Territories.
 See 0155
 National  Priorities List Sites:  Arizona and
 Nevada.
 See 0156
 National  Priorities List Sites:  Arizona and
 Nevada.
 See 0157
 National  Priorities  List Sites:  Arizona and
 Nevada, 1992.
 See 0158
 National Priorities List Sites: Arkansas.
 See 0159
 National Priorities List Sites: Arkansas.
 See 0160
 National Priorities List Sites: Arkansas, 1992.
 See 0161
 National Priorities List Sites: California.
 See 0162
 National Priorities List Sites:  California and
 Hawaii.
 See 0163
 National Priorities List Sites:  California and
 Hawaii, 1992.
 See 0164
 National Priorities List Sites: Colorado.
 See 0165
 National Priorities List Sites: Colorado.
 See 0166
 National Priorities List Sites: Colorado, 1992.
 See 0167
 National Priorities List Sites: Connecticut.
 See 0168
 National Priorities List Sites: Connecticut.
 See 0169
 National  Priorities  List  Sites:  Connecticut,
 1992.
 See 0170
 National Priorities List Sites: Delaware.
 See 0171
 National Priorities List Sites: Delaware.
 See 0172
 National Priorities List Sites: Delaware, 1992.
 See 0173
 National Priorities List Sites: Florida.
 See 0174
 National Priorities List Sites: Florida.
See 0175
 National  Priorities  List Sites:  Florida,  1992.
 See 0176
 National Priorities List Sites: Georgia.
See 0177
 National Priorities List Sites: Georgia.
See 0178
National Priorities List Sites: Georgia,  1992.
See 0179
 National Priorities List Sites: Hawaii.
 See 0180
 National Priorities List Sites: Idaho.
 See 0181
 National Priorities List Sites: Idaho.
 See 0182
 National Priorities List Sites: Idaho, 1992.
 See 0183
 National Priorities List Sites: Illinois.
 See 0184
 National Priorities List Sites: Illinois.
 See 0185
 National Priorities List  Sites: Illinois, 1992.
 See 0186
 National Priorities List Sites: Indiana.
 See 0187
 National Priorities List Sites: Indiana.
 See 0188
 National Priorities List Sites: Indiana, 1992.
 See 0189
 National Priorities List Sites: Iowa.
 See 0190
 National Priorities List Sites: Iowa.
 See 0191
 National Priorities List Sites: Iowa, 1992.
 See 0192
 National Priorities List Sites: Kansas.
 See 0193
 National Priorities List Sites: Kansas.
 See 0194
 National Priorities List Sites: Kansas, 1992.
 See 0195
 National Priorities List Sites: Kentucky.
 See 0196
 National Priorities List Sites: Kentucky.
 See 0197
 National Priorities List Sites: Kentucky, 1992.
 See 0198
 National Priorities List Sites: Louisiana.
 See 0199
 National Priorities List Sites: Louisiana.
 See 0200
 National Priorities List Sites: Louisiana, 1992.
 See 0201
 National Priorities List Sites: Maine.
 See 0202
 National Priorities List Sites: Maine.
 See 0203
 National Priorities List Sites: Maine,  1992.
 See 0204
 National Priorities List Sites: Maryland.
 See 0205
 National Priorities List Sites: Maryland.
 See 0206
 National Priorities List Sites: Maryland, 1992.
 See 0207
 National Priorities List Sites: Massachusetts.
 See 0208
 National Priorities List Sites: Massachusetts.
 See 0209
 National Priorities List Sites: Massachusetts,
 1992.
 See 0210
 National Priorities List Sites: Michigan.
 See 0211
 National Priorities List Sites: Michigan.
 See 0212
 National Priorities List Sites: Michigan,  1992.
See 0213
 National Priorities List Sites: Minnesota.
See 0214
 National Priorities List Sites: Minnesota.
See 0215
National Priorities  List  Sites:   Minnesota,
 1992.
See 0216
National Priorities List Sites: Mississippi.
See 0217
                                                                                                                               SU-91

-------
SUPERFUND
                                                           SUBJECT INDEX
   TfJatlonal Priorities list Sites: Mississippi.
    §000218       ;.."    'I
    National  Priorities  List  Sites:  Mississippi,
   	J,?92,	
    Soo 0219
    National Priorities Ust Sites: Missouri.
    Sea 0220
    National Priorities Ust Sites: Missouri.
    See 0221
    National  Priorities Ust Sites: Missouri, 1992.
    Soo 0222
   ;;; National Priorities List Sites: Montana.
    See 0223
   -'"National'Pfiontfes'Dsigiies: Montana.
    Sw 0224
    Nafionaf  Priorities "list Sites: Montana, 1992.
    See 0225
   i National Priorities Ust Sites: Nebraska.
    Soe0226
    NatJoriai Priorities Ust Sites: Nebraska.
    See 0227
   I'tilaSofiaf ' Priorities	 List" Sites:  Nebraska,
    1992.
    See 0228
    National  Priorities  Ust Sites:  New Hamp-
    shire.
    See 0229
   lii"National  Priorities  List Sites:  New Hamp-
   ,,	shiro.
    See 0230
    National  Priorities  Ust Sites:  New Hamp-
    shire, 1992.
    See 0231
    National Priorities Ust Sites: New Jersey.
    See 0232
    National Priorities Ust Sites: New Jersey.
    See 0233
    National Priorities  List Sites:  New Jersey,
    1992.
    Sea 0234
    National Priorities  Ust Sites: New  Mexico.
    See 0235
   -National Priorities  Ust Sites: New  Mexico.
    Sea 0236
    National Priorities  Ust Sites: New  Mexico,
     1992.
    See 0237
    National Priorities Ust Sites: New York.
    See 0238
    National Priorities Ust Sites: New York.
    See 0239
   "National  Priorities  List  Sites:  New  York,
     1992.
    See 0240
     National  Priorities  List  Sites: North  and
    South Dakota.
    See 0241
   "" National  Priorities  List  Sites: North  and
     South Dakota, 1992.
     See 0242
     National Priorities Ust Sites: North Carolina.
     Se«0243
   :; National Priorities Ust Sites: North Carolina.
   ="Sea0244  	
     National Priorities Ust Sites: North Carolina,
     1992.
     See 0245
     National Priorities List Sites: North Dakota
     and South Dakota.
     See 0246
     National Priorities Ust Sites: Onto.
     See 0247
     National Priorities List Sites: Ohio.
     See 0248
     National Priorities Ust Sites: Ohio, 1992.
     See 0249
   •- National Priorftiei Ust Sites: Oklahoma.
     See 02SO
   : National Priorities List Sites: Oklahoma.
     Sea 0251
National  Priorities  List  Sites:  Oklahoma,
1992.
See 0252
National Priorities Ust Sites: Oregon.
See 0253
National Priorities List Sites: Oregon.
See 0254
National  Priorities Ust  Sites:  Oregon, 1992.
See 0255
National  Priorities List Sites:  Pennsylvania.
See 0256
National  Priorities List Sites:  Pennsylvania.
See 0257
National  Priorities List Sites:  Pennsylvania,
1992.
See 0258
National Priorities Ust Sites: Puerto Rico.
See 0259
National Priorities List Sites: Puerto Rico.
See 0260
National Priorities List Sites: Puerto Rico and
Virgin Islands, 1992.
See 0261
National  Priorities List Sites: Rhode Island.
See 0262
National  Priorities List Sites: Rhode Island.
See 0263
National  Priorities Ust Sites: Rhode Island,
1992.
See 0264
National  Priorities List Sites Set (1991).
See 0265
National  Priorities List  Sites: South Carolina.
See 0266
National  Priorities List  Sites: South Carolina.
See 0267
National  Priorities List  Sites: South Carolina,
1992.
See 0268
National Priorities List Sites: Tennessee.
See 0269
National Priorities List Sites: Tennessee.
See 0270
National  Priorities   List  Sites:  Tennessee,
1992.
See 0271
National Priorities List Sites: Texas.
See 0272
National Priorities List Sites: Texas.
See 0273
National Priorities List Sites: Texas,  1992.
See 0274
National  Priorities   List  Sites:  The  United
States Territories, 1992.
See 0275
 National Priorities List Sites: Utah.
See 0276
 National Priorities List Sites: Utah.
See 0277
 National Priorities Ust Sites: Utah, 1992.
See 0278
 National Priorities List Sites: Vermont.
 See 0279
 National Priorities List  Sites: Vermont.
 See 0280
 National Priorities Ust Sites: Vermont, 1992.
 See 0281
 National Priorities List  Sites: Virginia.
 See 0282
 National Priorities List  Sites: Virginia.
 See 0283
 National Priorities List Sites: Virginia, 1992.
 See 0284
 National Priorities Ust Sites: Washington.
 See 0285
 National Priorities List Sites: Washington.
 See 0286
 National Priorities  Ust  Sites:  Washington,
 1992.
 See 0287
National  Priorities List Sites: West  Virginia.
See 0288
National  Priorities List Sites: West  Virginia.
See 0289
National  Priorities List Sites: West  Virginia,
1992.
See 0290
National Priorities List Sites: Wisconsin.
See 0291
National Priorities List Sites: Wisconsin.
See 0292
National   Priorities  List  Sites:  Wisconsin,
1992.
See 0293
National Priorities List Sites: Wyoming.
See 0294
National Priorities List Sites: Wyoming.
See 0295
National  Priorities Ust Sites: Wyoming, 1992.
See 0296
National  Superfund  Program Priorities, Fiscal
Year 1994.
See 0298
New Policy on Performance of Risk Assess-
ments during Remedial Investigation Feasi-
bility Studies (RI/FS) Conducted by Poten-
tially Responsible Parties (PRPs).
See 1061
Notification of Out-of-State Shipments of Su-
perfund Site Wastes.
See 0429
Notification  Requirements  for  Continuous
Releases of Hazardous Substances.
See 1148
NPL Characterization  Project: National Re-
sults.
See 0355
NPL Characterization Project: Region 1 Re-
sults.
See 0356
NPL Characterization Project: Region 3 Re-
sults.
See 0357
NPL Characterization Project: Region 4 Re-
sults.
See 0358
NPL Characterization Project: Region 5 Re-
sults.
See 0359
NPL Characterization Project: Region 6 Re-
sults.
See 0360
 NPL Characterization Project: Region 7 Re-
sults.
See 0361
 NPL Characterization  Project: Region 8 Re-
 sults.
 See 0362
 NPL Characterization Project: Region 9 Re-
 sults.
 See 0363
 NPL Characterization Project: Region 10 Re-
 sults.
 See 0364
 NPL Construction  Completion Definition  at
 Bioremediation  and  Soil  Vapor  Extraction
 Sites.
 See 0365
 Obligation of Funds under Superfund State
 Contracts.
 See 0478
 Obtaining a Soil and Debris Treatability Vari-
 ance  for Removal Actions.  Superfund LDR
 Guide No. 6B.
 See 0430
 SU-92

-------
                                                     SUBJECT INDEX
                                                                        SUPERFUND
 OERR  Organizational Conflict  of  Interest
 Review and Approval Program  (Superfund
 Management Review: Recommendation No.
 46C).
 See 0046
 Off-Site Policy: RFA or Equivalent Investiga-
 tion Requirement at RCRA Treatment and
 Storage Facilities.
 See 0431
 Oil Notifications:  Emergency Response Noti-
 fication System (ERNS) Fact Sheet.
 See 0930
 Oil  Spill  Contingency   Planning:  National
 Status. A Report  to the President.
 See 0931
 OPA Q's and A's: Overview of the Oil Pollu-
 tion Act of 1990.
 See 0933
 Options for Developing and Evaluating Miti-
 gation  Strategies for Indoor Air  Impacts  at
 CERCLA  Sites.   Air/Superfund  National
 Technical Guidance  Study Series, Report
 ASF-36.
 See 1415
 Organic  Contract  Compliance  Screening
 System (OCCSS) Software (OLM01.8 Ver-
 sion 4) (for Microcomputers).
 See 0051
 Organic  Contract  Compliance  Screening
 System (OCCSS) Software (OLM01.8 Ver-
 sion 5) (for Microcomputers).
 See 0052
 OSWER Integrated Health and Safety Policy.
 See 0920
 OSWER Integrated Health and Safety Stand-
 ard Operating Practices.
 See 0921
 OSWER  Source  Book: Training  and Tech-
 nology Transfer Resources.
 See 1283
 OSWER  Source  Book. Volume  1. Training
 and Technology  Transfer Resources, 1992-
 1993.
 See 1284
 OSWER  Source  Book. Volume  2. Training
 and Technology  Transfer Resources, 1992-
 1993.
 See 1285
 Overview of ERNS:  Emergency Response
 Notification System (ERNS) Fact Sheet.
 See 0935
 Overview of the Off-Site Policy for OSCs and
 RPMs.
 See 0433
 Overview  of  the  Outyear  Liability Model
 (OLM).
 See 0106
 Overview  of  the  Outyear  Liability Model
 (OLM).
 See 0107
 PA Review Checklist.
 See 0366
 PA-Score  (Preliminary Assessment Score)
 User's Manual and Tutorial. Version 2.1.
See 0367
 PA-Soore  (Preliminary Assessment  Score),
Version 1.0 (for Microcomputers).
See 0368
PA-Score  (Preliminary Assessment  Score),
Version 2.1, 3 1/2 inch  (for Microcomput-
ers).
See 0369
 PA-Score  (Preliminary Assessment  Score),
Version 2.1, 5 1/4 inch  (for Microcomput-
ers).
See 0370
PA-Score  Software,  Version 1.0.  Users
Manual and Tutorial.
See 0371
 Performance of Risk Assessments in Reme-
 dial  Investigation/Feasibility Studies  (Rl/
 FSs) Conducted by Potentially  Responsible
 Parties (PRPs).
 See 1102
 Performance  Tracking  under ARCS Con-
 tracts.
 See 0061
 Permits and Permit 'Equivalency'  Processes
 for CERCLA On-Site Response Actions.
 See 0435
 Pilot-Scale  Demonstration of a Slurry-Phase
 Biological Reactor for Creosote-Contaminat-
 ed Soil. Applications Analysis Report.
 See 1426
 Pilot-Scale  Incineration  of  Comtarninated
 Soils from  the  Drake Chemical  Superfund
 Site.
 See 1522
 Pilot-Scale  Incineration  of  Contaminated
 Sludges  from the  Bofors-Nobel  Superfund
 Site.
 See 1289
 Pilot-Scale  Incineration of Contaminated Soil
 from the Chemical  Insecticide  Corporation
 Superfund Site.
 See 1523
 Pilot-Scale  Incineration of PCB-Contaminat-
 ed Sediments from the New Bedford Harbor
 Hot Spot Superfund Site.
 See 1292
 Planning for Sufficient Community Relations
 (Superfund  Management Review:  No. 43A).
 See 0108
 Policy  for  Enforcement Actions  against
 Transporters under CERCLA.
 See 0584
 Policy  for  Superfund Compliance with the
 RCRA Land Disposal Restrictions.
 See 0436
 Policy on Floodplains and Wetland Assess-
 ments for CERCLA Actions.
 See 0437
 Policy on Management of Post-Removal Site
 Control.
 See 1008
 Policy  on  Recovering  Indirect  Cost in
 CERCLA Section 107 Cost  Recovery Ac-
 tions.
 See 0585
 Policy Towards Owners of Residential Prop-
 erty at Superfund Sites.
 See 0586
 Political Subdivision Involvement  in  Super-
 fund.
 See 0479
 Political Subdivision Involvement  in  Super-
 fund.
 See 0480
 Preliminary   Ranking    Evaluation   Score
 (PREscore)  Version 1.1  (for Microcomput-
 ers).
 See 0372
 Preliminary   Ranking    Evaluation   Score
 (PREscore)  Version 2.0  (for Microcomput-
 ers).
 See 0373
 Preparation  of  Hazardous Waste  Referrals.
See 0588
 PREscore Software. Users Manual and Tuto-
 rial. Version 1.0.
See 0374
 PREscore Software: Users Manual and Tuto-
 rial Version  2.0.
See 0375
 Presentations   EPA-State  Soil    Standards
Conference. Held in Crystal City, Virginia on
January 29,  1991.
See 1524
 Presumptive Remedies:  Policy  and   Proce-
dures.
See 1103
 Presumptive Remedies: Site Characterization
 and Technology Selection for CERCLA Sites
 with Volatile  Organic  Compounds in Soils.
 See 1104
 Presumptive Remedy for CERCLA Municipal
 Landfill Sites.
 See 1105
 Priority for Health and Safety Requirements,
 Especially  Medical  Surveillance  Require-
 ments, for EPA  Employees Who Support
 OSWER Programs.
 See 0923
 Procedure  for Use  of  USAGE  Preplaced
 Contracts to Expedite Superfund Cleanup
 Tasks.
 See 1131
 Procedures  for   Documenting  Costs   for
 CERCLA Section 107 Actions.
 See 0590
 Procedures for Transmittal of CERCLA and
 RCRA Civil Judicial Enforcement Case Pack-
 ages to Headquarters.
 See 0591
 Procedures to Ensure that CLP  Laboratories
 Are Not Paid for Non-Compliant or Unuse-
 able Data.
 See 0062
 Procuring Innovative Technologies at Reme-
 dial Sites: Q's and A's  and  Case Studies.
 See 1132
 Progress Toward Implementing Superfund.
 Fiscal Year 1988.
 See 0299
 Progress Toward Implementing Superfund.
 Fiscal Year 1989.
 See 0300
 Progress Toward Implementing Superfund,
 Fiscal Year 1990: A Report to the Congress.
 See 0301
 Progress Toward Implementing Superfund,
 Fiscal Year 1991. Report to Congress.
 See 0302
 Proposed Method to Evaluate the Effective-
 ness  of Community Involvement in Super-
 fund (Superfund Management Review: Rec-
 ommendation Number 43.A).
 See 0109
 Prospects for In situ Chemical Treatment for
 Contaminated Soil.
 See 1525
 PRP  Search Supplemental  Guidance  for
 Sites  in the Superfund Remedial Program.
 See 0592
 Public Awareness Signs at Superfund Sites.
 See 0481
 Quality and  Environmental Protection:  The
 EPA QA Program.
 See 0990
Quality Assurance for  Superfund  Environ-
 mental Data Collection Activities.
 See 0991
 Quality Assurance/Quality Control Guidance
for  Removal  Activities:  Sampling QA/QC
 Plan and Data Validation Procedures.
 See 0993
 Quantifying  Effects  in Ecological Site  As-
 sessments:  Biological and Statistical Consid-
 erations.
See 1063
Questions and  Answers  About the  State
 Role in  Remedy Selection at Non-Fund-Fi-
 nanced Enforcement Sites.
See 0482
Questions and Answers on Release Notifica-
tion Requirements and Reportable Quantity
Adjustments.
See 1149
RCRA, Superfund Monthly Hot Line Reports.
See 0303
                                                                                                                          SU-93

-------
              SUPERFUND
       SUBJECT INDEX
                  Real  Estate  Acquisition  Procedures  for
                  USAGE Projects.
                  See 1133
                  Reassignment of CLP Transportation Func-
                ;;:, • {tons.
                ,, Sea 0063     ..................... '
                i  Reductive Dchatogonation of Organic Con-
                i.  taniinants  in  Soils  and Ground  Water.
                ii. Ground Water Issue,
                " §e« 1527 .'   ,.„"    ""
                ||j  fiegtonal Guide: issuing Site-Specific Treat-
                !  abllfty Variances for Contaminated Soils and
                !  Debris  from  Land  Disposal  Restrictions
                  (LDRs).
                  SCO 1528
                  Regional Oversight of Federal Facility Clean-
                  ups under CEROLA.
                  Sea 0900
                ...... Regional pilot Projects and Initiatives.
                ii; SCO 0064
                  Regional Pilots and Applications of Super-
                  fund Accelerated Cleanup Model (SACM).
                  SeeOIIQ
                  Regional Quality Control  Guidance  for NPL
                  Candidate Sites,
                  Sea 0376
                  Releasing Identities of Potentially Responsi-
                  ble Parties in Response to FOIA Requests.
                  See 0594
                  Releasing information to Potentially  Respon-
                  sible Parties at CERCLA Sites.
                  Sea 0595
                  Remedial Action Report:  Documentation for
                  Operable Unit Completion.
                   Remedial Investigation: Site Characterization
                ,:: ....... and Treatability Studies.
                "Sea 1106
                "-Removal Cost Management System: Version
                   3.2.
                ........ SMIOO? ..........................
                ............. Removal Program Representative Sampling
                   Guidance, Volume 1. Soil.
                   Sea 1010
                   Report to Congress: Settlements with Munic-
                   Ipal Waste  Generators  and  Transporters
                   Slnc« 1991  under the Comprehensive  Envi-
                   ronmental Response, Compensation, and Li-
                   ability Act of 1980.
                   See 0596
                   Reporting and Exchange of Information on
                   State Enforcement Actions at National Prior-
                   ities List Sites.
                   See 0483
                   Reporting Requirements for Continuous Re-
                ;,;;,, teases, of ..... Hazardous ...... Substances;  A Guide,,
                "-for Facilities and Vessels on Compliance.
                "- See 1150 .......................
                '.",' Aooufoch Pneumatic  Fracturing Extraction
                "!!  and Hot Gas Injection, Phase 1. Applications
                   Analysts Report.
                   See 1190
                   Application  of  Tradescantia  Micronucleus
                j'l Assay for In situ Evaluation of Potential Ge-
                   netic Hazards from Exposure to Chemicals
                   at a Wood-Preserving Site.
                   Soa1195
                   Asymmetric Loss .Function for Superfund Re-
                   mediation Decisions.
                   Sae 1200
                   Bench-Scale Evaluation of Alternative  Bio-
                   logical Treatment Processes for the Remedi-
                   ation of Pentachlorophenpl- and Creosote-
                   Contaminated Materials: Slurry-Phase Biore-
                   modlatton.
                   Soo1419
                   Bench-Scale Evaluation of Alternative  Bio-
                   logical Treatment Processes for the Remedi-
                ""/Mbn of Pantachlorpphenol- and Creosote-
                ;™; Contaminated Materials:  Solid-Phase_Biqre-
                ........... imtdtatfon. .......................
                   8091420
Chemical Stabilization of Mixed Organic and
Metal Compounds. EPA SITE Program Dem-
onstration of the Silicate Technology Corpo-
ration Process.
See 1212
Control  Technologies  for  Remediation of
Contaminated Soil  and Waste Deposits at
Superfund Lead Battery Recycling Sites.
See 1221
Control  Technology:  Estimating Innovative
Technology Costs for the SITE Program.
See 1222
Cost  Estimating  Systems  for  Remedial
Action Projects.
See 1123
Demonstration of Microfiltration Technology.
See 1228
Detoxification of Pentachlorophenol and Cre-
osote Contaminated Groundwater by Physi-
cal Extraction: Chemical and Biological As-
sessment.
See 1438
Engineering  Bulletins: Aids to the  Develop-
ment of Remedial Alternatives.
See 1236
EPA  SITE Demonstration of the BioTrol Soil
Washing Process.
See 1502
Evaluation of Waste Stabilized by the Solidi-
tech  SITE Technology.
See 1554
Factors Affecting the Applicability of Plasma
Systems to the Cleanup of Superfund Sites.
See 1250
Incineration  Treatment  of  Arsenic-Contami-
nated Soil.
See 1268
Long-Path FTIR Measurements of Volatile
Organic Compounds in an  Industrial Setting
(July 1989-April 1991).
See 1413
Management Systems  Review of the Super-
fund  RI/FS: Opportunities  for Streamlining.
See 1101
PAST:  The  Potential ARARs Selection Tool.
See 0434
Personnel  Protection   through  Reconnais-
sance   Robotics  at   Superfund  Remedial
Sites.
See 1286
Pilot-Scale  Incinerability Evaluation  of Ar-
senic-and  Lead-Contaminated Soils  from
Two  Superfund Sites.
See 1288
Pilot-Scale  Incineration of  PCB-Contaminat-
ed Sediments from the  Hot Spot of the New
Bedford Harbor Superfund Site.
See 1291
Remediation of Contaminated Soils by Sol-
vent Rushing.
See  1529
Results from the Stabilization Technologies
Evaluated by the Site  Program. New  Eng-
land Environmental Expo 90.
See  1558
SITE Demonstration of the Basic Extractive
Sludge Treatment Process.
See  1300
SITE Demonstration of the CF Systems Or-
ganics Extraction System.
See  1301
SITE Program  Demonstration  of  the  SBP
Technologies,  Inc.,   Membrane  Filtration
System on Creosote-Contaminated Water.
See  1592
Small  Systems Meet  Superfund Challenge
with  Point-of-Entry Treatment Units.
See  1304
Solvent Extraction  Processes:  A Survey of
Systems in  the SITE Program.
See  1305
Sorptipn, Important in  Stabilized/Solidified
Waste Forms.
See 1563
Superfund Soils Data Management System.
See 1536
Treatment of Nonhazardous Petroleum-Con-
taminated   Soils  by Thermal  Desorption
Technologies.
See 1547
U.S. EPA SITE Demonstration of AWD Tech-
nologies' AquaDetox/SVE System.
See 1363
Use of Electrokinetics for Hazardous Waste
Site Remediation.
See 1366
Will Soil Working Work  for the Sand Creek
Superfund Site.
See 1548
Required Contracts Management Training
for Regional Superfund Personnel.
See 0065
Resources  for Preparing Independent Gov-
ernment Estimates  for Remedial Contracting
Work Assignments.
See 0066
Response Action Contractor Final Indemnifi-
cation  Guidelines.  Volume 2, Number  1,
March 1993.
See 0067
Revised EPA Guidance  on  Parallel Proceed-
ings.
See 0597
Revised  Hazard Ranking  System:  An  Im-
proved Tool for Screening  Superfund Sites.
See 0377
Revised  Hazard  Ranking   System:  Back-
ground Information.
See 0378
Revised Hazard Ranking System:  Evaluating
Sites After Waste Removals.
See 0379
Revised  Hazard  Ranking   System  (HRS):
Final Rule.
See 0380
Revised Hazard Ranking System: Qs and
As.
See 0381
Revised Hazardous Waste  Bankruptcy Guid-
ance.
See 0598
Revised Hazardous Waste  Bankruptcy Guid-
ance, October 7, 1991.
See 0599
Revised Interim Final Guidance on Indian In-
volvement in the Superfund Program.
See 0484
Revised Policy  on  Discretionary Information
Release under CERCLA.
See 0600
Revised  Procedures for Implementing Off-
Site Response Actions.
See 0601
Revision  of  Policy  Regarding  Superfund
Project Assignment between Alternative  Re-
medial Contracting Strategy Contractors and
the U.S. Army Corps of  Engineers.
See 0068
Revisions to OMB Circular A-94  on Guide-
lines and  Discount Rates for Benefit-Cost
Analysis.
See 1107
Revisions to the Interim Guidance on  PRP
Participation in  Remedial Investigations  and
Feasibility Studies.
See 0603
RI/FS Improvements.
See 1108
RI/FS Improvements Follow-Up.
See 1109
               SU-94
i,'I	iSil!	JCtlilL
                       i,i	KIM 	I	ill	,  Sllli !	liik	i  ",» i,,;  »!*•• 	i.il!iiii :
                                                                         	ii II
                                                                                                                                            ]	i>l	.;!	,1 iiilE

-------
                                                    SUBJECT INDEX
                                                                       SUPERFUND
RI/FS Streamlining.
See 1110
Risk Assessment Guidance for  Superfund.
Volume 1. Human Health Evaluation Manual.
Part A, April 1990.
See 1066
Risk Assessment Guidance for  Superfund.
Volume 1. Human Health Evaluation Manual
(Part B).
See 1067
Risk Assessment Guidance for  Superfund.
Volume 1. Human Health Evaluation Manual
(Part B, Development of Risk-Based Prelimi-
nary Remediation Goals).
See 1068
Risk Assessment Guidance for  Superfund.
Volume 1. Human Health Evaluation Manual
(Part C).
See 1069
Risk Assessment Guidance for  Superfund.
Volume 1. Human Health Evaluation Manual
(Part C, Risk Evaluation of Remedial Alterna-
tives).
See 1070
Risk Assessment Guidance for  Superfund.
Volume 1. Human Health Evaluation Manual.
Supplemental Guidance: 'Standard  Default
Exposure Factors'.
See 1071
Risk Assessment in  Superfund: A  Primer.
First Edition, September 1990.
See 1073
ROD Annual Report, FY 1989.
See 1111
ROD Annual Report, FY 1990.
See 1112
ROD Annual Report, FY1991. Volume 1.
See 1113
ROD Annual Report, FY1991. Volume 2.
See 1114
ROD Annual Report, FY 1992.
See 1115
Role of Community Interviews in the Devel-
opment of a Community Relations Program
for Remedial Response.
See 0485
Role of Expedited Response Actions under
SARA.
See 1116
Role of the  Baseline Risk Assessment in
Superfund Remedy Selection Decisions.
See 1075
Roles and Responsibilities of Deputy Project
Officers and  Work  Assignment Managers
under the Technical  Enforcement  Support
(TES) Contracts.
See 0069
Roles  and  Responsibilities  of  Regional
Project Officers, Zone Project Officers, Work
Assignment Managers and Contracting Offi-
cers for the RCRA Enforcement, Permitting
and Assistance Contracts (REPA).
See 0070
Roles  and  Responsibilities  of  Regional
Project Officers  and Headquarters Zone
Project Officers  for  Management  of  TES
(TES 5) Contracts.
See 0604
Rotating Biological Contactors.  Engineering
Bulletin.
See 1297
SACM  Regional  Decision  Teams:  Interim
Guidance.  Volume 1,  Number 5, December
1992.
See 0111
Sampler's  Guide to the Contract Laboratory
Program.
See 0071
Scope of the CERCLA Petroleum Exclusion
under Sections 101(14) and 104(a)(2).
See 0605
Scoper's Notes:  An RI/FS  Costing Guide.
Bringing in a Quality  RI/FS on Time  and
Within Budget.
See 1117
Sector Sampling  for VOC's  during  Remedi-
ation of Superfund Site  at  Shaver's Farm,
Georgia.
See 1417
Selection of Control Technologies for Reme-
diation of Lead Battery Recycling Sites.  (En-
gineering Bulletin).
See 1298
Site Assessment: Evaluating  Risks at Super-
fund Sites.
See 1076
Site   Assessment   Information  Directory
(SAID)  Region 1  (for Microcomputers). Date
of Coverage: October 1991.
See 0382
Site   Assessment   Information  Directory
(SAID)  Region 2  (for Microcomputers). Date
of Coverage: October 1991.
See 0383
Site   Assessment   Information  Directory
(SAID)  Region 3  (for Microcomputers). Date
of Coverage: October 1991.
See 0384
Site   Assessment   Information  Directory
(SAID)  Region 4  (for Microcomputers). Date
of Coverage: October 1991.
See 0385
Site   Assessment   Information  Directory
(SAID)  Region 5  (for Microcomputers). Date
of Coverage: 1991.
See 0386
Site   Assessment   Information  Directory
(SAID)  Region 6  (for Microcomputers). Date
of Coverage: October 1991.
See 0387
Site   Assessment   Information  Directory
(SAID)  Region 7  (for Microcomputers). Date
of Coverage: October 1991.
See 0388
Site   Assessment   Information  Directory
(SAID)  Region 8  (for Microcomputers). Date
of Coverage: 1991.
See 0389
Site   Assessment   Information  Directory
(SAID)  Region 9  (for Microcomputers). Date
of Coverage: October 1991.
See 0390
Site   Assessment   Information  Directory
(SAID) Region 10 (for Microcomputers). Date
of Coverage: October 1991.
See 0391
Site Classification Changes  from Enforce-
ment to Fund Lead.
See 0606
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
Frequency by Party Name Report
See 0607
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
Frequency by Party Name Report.
See 0608
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
Frequency by Party Name Report.
See 0609
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
Frequency by PRP Name  Report, September
26, 1991.
See 0610
Site Enforcement Tracking System  (SETS)
(National).
See 0611
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
National Alphabetical Report  by PRP Name,
September 26, 1991.
See 0612
Site Enforcement Tracking System  (SETS)
(National) (for Microcomputers).
See 0613
Site  Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
National Frequency by  PRP Name Report.
See 0614
Site  Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
National PRP Listing Alphabetically by PRP
Name.
See 0615
Site  Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
National PRP Listing Alphabetically by PRP
Name.
See 0616
Site  Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
National PRP Listing by Site.
See 0617
Site  Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
National PRP Listing by Site.
See 0618
Site  Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
National PRP Report by Site, September 26,
1991.
See 0619
Site  Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)
(National -  3 1/2 Inch  Diskette, IBM PS/2
Compatible) (for Microcomputers).
See 0620
Site  Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Alabama.
See 0621
Site  Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Alabama.
See 0622
Site  Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Alabama.
See 0623
Site  Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for American Samoa.
See 0624
Site  Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for American Samoa.
See 0625
Site  Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for American Samoa.
See 0626
Site  Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Arizona.
See 0627
Site  Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Arizona.
See 0628
Site  Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Arizona.
See 0629
Site  Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Arkansas.
See 0630
Site  Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Arkansas.
See 0631
Site  Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Arkansas.
See 0632
Site  Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for California.
See 0633
Site  Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for California.
See 0634
Site  Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for California.
See 0635
Site  Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Colorado.
See 0636
Site  Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Colorado.
See 0637
Site  Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Colorado.
See 0638
                                                                                                                          SU-95

-------
                 SUPERFUND
                                                       SUBJECT INDEX
Hi;
,, Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
  PRP Listing by Site for Connecticut
  Soa 0639
  Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
  PRP Listing by Site for Connecticut
  Sea 0640
••Sita Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
ii  PRP Listing by Site for Connecticut
  Saa 0641
  Sita Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
i  PRP Listing by Site for Delaware.
^Sm 064.2
  Site EnfOTcement Jraiking System (SETS):
6 P;RP Usting by Site for Delaware.
  Sea 0643
  Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
  PRP UsSng by Site for Delaware.
  Sea 0644
	Site Enforcement Jraekjng System (SETS):
;,' PR? Listing by Site for Florida.
  See 0645
:  Sita Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
I PRP Listing by Site for Florida.
  Seo 0646
  Sita Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
;; £PP Ustfng by Site for Florida.
  Saa 0647
:  Sita Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
i...fpR Listing by Site for Georgia.
  Sea 0648
„  Sita Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
"  PRP Listing by Site for Georgia.
  See 0649
  Sita Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
  PHP Listing by Site for Georgia.
  See 0650
I  SRa Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
'  PRP Usling by Site for Idaho.
  See 0651
  Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
i  PRP Listing by Site for Idaho.
  Sea 0652
  Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
  PRP LisUng by Site for Idaho.
  Sea 0653
  Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
1  PRP Listing by Site for Illinois.
  Sea 0654
  Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
  PRP Listing by Site for Illinois.
  Sea 0655
!  Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
  PRP Listing by Site for Illinois.
i, See 0656
lijtal Enforcement"tracking  System (SETS):
  PRP Listing by Site for Indiana.
 See 0657
! Sjte]" Enforcemeni	Irackjpg  System (SETS):
] P.RP (Jstlng by Site for Indiana.
 Saa 0658
I S(te Enforcement Tracking  System (SETS):
; PPP Listing by Site for Indiana.
!§ee065f	„
 Stta Enforcement Tracking  System (SETS):
 PRP Listing by Site for Iowa.
,,§000660	
 Sita Enforcement tracking  System (SETS):
1 PRP Listing by Site for Iowa.
 See 0661
 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
 PRP Listing by Site for Iowa.
 See 0662
•Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
 PHP Listing by Site for Kansas.
, See 0663	
 Site Enforcement tracking System (SETS):
; EPE Listing by Site for Kansas.
 See 0664
 Stta Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
 PRP Listing by Site for Kansas.
 SQQ 0665
 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
 PRP Listing by Site for Kentucky.
 See 0666
 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
 PRP Listing by Site for Kentucky.
 See 0667
 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
 PRP Listing by Site for Kentucky.
 See 0668
 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
 PRP Listing by Site for Louisiana.
 See 0669
 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
 PRP Listing by Site for Louisiana.
 See 0670
 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
 PRP Listing by Site for Louisiana.
 See 0671
 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
 PRP Listing by Site for Maine.
 See 0672
 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
 PRP Listing by Site for Maine.
 See 0673
 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
 PRP Listing by Site for Maine.
 See 0674
 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
 PRP Listing by Site for Maryland.
 See 0675
 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
 PRP Listing by Site for Maryland.
 See 0676
 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
 PRP Listing by Site for Maryland.
 See 0677
 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
 PRP Listing by Site for Massachusetts.
 See 0678
 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
 PRP Listing by Site for Massachusetts.
 See 0679
 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
 PRP Listing by Site for Massachusetts.
 See 0680
 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
 PRP Listing by Site for Michigan.
 See 0681
 Site Enforcement Tracking  System (SETS):
 PRP Listing by Site for Michigan.
 See 0682
 Site Enforcement Tracking  System (SETS):
 PRP Listing by Site for Michigan.
 See 0683
 Site Enforcement Tracking  System (SETS):
 PRP Listing by Site for Minnesota.
 See 0684
 Site Enforcement Tracking  System (SETS):
 PRP Listing by Site for Minnesota.
 See 0685
 Site Enforcement Tracking  System (SETS):
 PRP Listing by Site for Minnesota.
 See 0686
 Site Enforcement Tracking  System (SETS):
 PRP Listing by Site for Mississippi.
 See 0687
 Site Enforcement Tracking  System (SETS):
 PRP Listing by Site for Mississippi.
See 0688
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
 PRP Listing by Site for Mississippi.
See 0689
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
 PRP Listing by Site for Missouri.
See 0690
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Missouri.
See 0691
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Missouri.
See Q692
 Site Enforcement Tracking  System (SETS):
 PRP Listing by Site for Montana.
 See 0693
 Site Enforcement Tracking  System (SETS):
 PRP Listing by Site for Montana.
 See 0694
 Site Enforcement Tracking  System (SETS):
 PRP Listing by Site for Montana.
 See 0695
 Site Enforcement Tracking  System (SETS):
 PRP Listing by Site for Nebraska.
 See 0696
 Site Enforcement Tracking  System (SETS):
 PRP Listing by Site for Nebraska.
 See 0697
 Site Enforcement Tracking  System (SETS):
 PRP Listing by Site for Nebraska.
 See 0698
 Site Enforcement Tracking  System (SETS):
 PRP Listing by Site for Nevada.
 See 0699
 Site Enforcement Tracking  System (SETS):
 PRP Listing by Site for Nevada.
 See 0700
 Site Enforcement Tracking  System (SETS):
 PRP Listing by Site for Nevada.
 See 0701
 Site Enforcement Tracking  System (SETS):
 PRP Listing by Site for New Hampshire.
 See 0702
 Site Enforcement Tracking  System (SETS):
 PRP Listing by Site for New Hampshire.
 See 0703
 Site Enforcement Tracking  System (SETS):
 PRP Listing by Site for New Hampshire.
 See 0704
 Site Enforcement Tracking  System (SETS):
 PRP Listing by Site for New Jersey.
 See 0705
 Site Enforcement Tracking  System (SETS):
 PRP Listing by Site for New Jersey.
 See 0706
 Site Enforcement Tracking  System (SETS):
 PRP Listing by Site for New Jersey.
 See 0707
 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
 PRP Listing by Site for New Mexico.
 See 0708
 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
 PRP Listing by Site for New Mexico.
 See 0709
 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
 PRP Listing by Site for New Mexico.
 See 0710
 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
 PRP Listing by Site for New York.
 See 0711
 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
 PRP Listing by Site for New York.
 See 0712
 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
 PRP Listing by Site for New York.
 See 0713
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
 PRP Listing by Site for North Carolina.
See 0714
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
 PRP Listing by Site for North Carolina.
See 0715
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for North Carolina.
See 0716
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for North Dakota.
See 0717
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for North Dakota.
See 0718
                SU-96

-------
                                                     SUBJECT INDEX
                                                                        SUPERFUND
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for North Dakota.
See 0719
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Northern Marianas.
See 0720
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Northern Marianas.
See 0721
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Northern Marianas.
See 0722
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Ohio.
See 0723
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Ohio.
See 0724
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Ohio.
See 0725
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Oklahoma.
See 0726
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Oklahoma.
See 0727
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Oklahoma.
See 0728
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Oregon.
See 0729
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Oregon.
See 0730
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Oregon.
See 0731
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Pennsylvania.
See 0732
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Pennsylvania.
See 0733
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Pennsylvania.
See 0734
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Puerto Rico.
See 0735
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Puerto Rico,
See 0736
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Puerto Rico.
See 0737
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 1.
See 0738
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 1.
See 0739
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 1.
See 0740
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site  for Region 1, January
22, 1992.
See 0741
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 1. Volume 1.
See 0742
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 2.
See 0743
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 2.
See 0744
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 2.
See 0745
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing  by Site for Region  2, January
22, 1992.
See 0746
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 2. Volume 2.
See 0747
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 3.
See 0748
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 3.
See 0749
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing  by Site for Region  3, January
22, 1992.
See 0750
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 3. Volume 3.
See 0751
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 4.
See 0752
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 4.
See 0753
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 4.
See 0754
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing  by Site for Region  4, January
22, 1992.
See 0755
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 4. Volume 4.
See 0756
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 5.
See 0757
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 5.
See 0758
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 5.
See 0759
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing  by Site for Region  5, January
22, 1992.
See 0760
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 5. Volume 5.
See 0761
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 6.
See 0762
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 6.
See 0763
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 6.
See 0764
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region  6, January
22, 1992.
See 0765
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 6. Volume 6.
See 0766
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 7.
See 0767
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 7.
See 0768
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 7.
See 0769
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for  Region  7, January
22,  1992.
See 0770
 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
 PRP Listing by Site for Region 7. Volume 7.
 See 0771
 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
 PRP Listing by Site for Region 8.
 See 0772
 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
 PRP Listing by Site for Region 8.
 See 0773
 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
 PRP Listing by Site for Region 8.
. See 0774
 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
 PRP Listing by Site for  Region 8, January
 22, 1992.
 See 0775
 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
 PRP Listing by Site for Region 8. Volume 8.
 See 0776
 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
 PRP Listing by Site for Region 9. -
 See 0777
 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
 PRP Listing by Site for Region 9.
 See 0778
 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
 PRP Listing by Site for Region 9.
 See 0779
 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
 PRP Listing by Site for  Region 9, January
 22, 1992.
 See 0780
 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
 PRP Listing by Site for Region 9. Volume 9.
 See 0781
 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
 PRP Listing by Site for Region 10.
 See 0782
 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
 PRP Listing by Site for Region 10.
 See 0783
 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
 PRP Listing by Site for Region 10.
 See 0784
 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
 PRP Listing by  Site for Region 10, January
 22, 1992.
 See 0785
 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
 PRP Listing by Site for Region 10. Volume
 10.
 See 0786
 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
 PRP Listing by Site for Rhode Island.
 See 0787
 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
 PRP Listing by Site for Rhode Island.
 See 0788
 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
 PRP Listing by Site for Rhode Island.
 See 0789
 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
 PRP Listing by Site for South Carolina.
 See 0790
 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
 PRP Listing by Site for South Carolina.
 See 0791
 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
 PRP Listing by Site for South Carolina.
 See 0792
 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
 PRP Listing by Site for South Dakota.
 See 0793
 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
 PRP Listing by Site for South Dakota.
 See 0794
 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
 PRP Listing by Site for South Dakota.
 See 0795
                                                                                                                            SU-97

-------
 SUPERFUND
       SUBJECT  INDEX
     She Enforcement Tracking System  (SETS):
     PRP Usting by Site for Tennessee.
     See 0796
     Site Enforcement Tracking System  (SETS):
     PRP Listing by Site for Tennessee.
     Sea 0797
     Site Enforcement Tracking System  (SETS):
     PRP Usting by Site for Tennessee.
     See 0798
     Site Enforcement Tracking System  (SETS):
     PRP Usting by Site for Texas.
     See 0799
     Stt« Enforcement Tracking System  (SETS):
     PRP Usting by Sfte for Texas.
     See 0800
     SWa Enforcement Tracking System  (SETS):
     PRP Usting by Site for Texas.
     See 0801
     Site Enforcement Tracking System  (SETS):
     PRP Usting by Site for Trust Territories.
    ,308,0802 ....................................
     Site Enforcement tracking System  (SETS):
     PRP Usting by Site for Trust Territories.
     See 0803
     Site Enforcement tracking System  (SETS):
    II, PRP Usting by Site for trust Territories.
     SooOOCM
    jjite Enforcernenl Tracking System  (SETS):
     PRP Usting by Site for Utah.
     See 0805
    : Site Enforcement Tracking System  (SETS):
     PRP Usting by Site for Utah.
     Sea 0806
    "Site Enforcement tracking System  (SETS):
     PRP Usting by Site for Utah.
     See 0807
    •§|te Enforcement Tracking System  (SETS):
     PRP Usting by Site for Vermont.
     Sea 0808
     §tta Enforcement tracking System  (SETS):
    ; PRP Usting by Site for Vermont.
     Saa0809
     Site Enforcement Tracking System  (SETS):
    ! PRP Usting by Site for Vermont.
     See 0910
     Site Enforcement Tracking System  (SETS):
     PRP Listing by Site for Virginia.
        | Enforcement tracking System (SETS):
   iJ?PP Listing by Site for Virginia.
   '•'See 0612
   'Site Enforcement tracking System (SETS):
    PRP Usting by Site for Washington.
    See 0813
    Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
    PRP Usting by Site for Washington.
    Sea Q814
   fSfte Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
    PRP Usting by Site for Washington.
        Ehf
-------
                                                    SUBJECT INDEX
                                                                       SUPERFUND
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)
(Region 10) (for Microcomputers).
See 0868
Site-Specific Contracting for Removals.
See 1011
Small Cost Recovery Referrals.
See 0869
Smart Moves in  Superfund - Regional Initia-
tives. Volume  1, Number 1,  February 1992.
See 0305
Smart Moves in  Superfund - Regional Pilots
and Initiatives. Volume  1, Number 2,  Sep-
tember 1992.
See 0306
Smart  Moves  in Superfund  - Revitalization
One Year Later.  Volume 1, Number 3, Janu-
ary 1993.
See 0307
Soliditech,  Inc.   Solidification/Stabilization
Process: Applications Analysis Report.
See 1562
Some Major Factors Important in Establish-
ing Land Use  Policy for Remediated Super-
fund Sites.
See 0308
Specifications and  Guidance for Contami-
nant-Free Sample Containers.
See 0994
SRIS  System Overview and User's Guide.
See 0112
Standard Document for Remedial  Site As-
sessment Decisions.
See 0392
Standard Operating Safety Guides.
See 0924
Standard Operating Safety Guides.
See 0925
Status of Key SACM Program Management
Issues: Interim Guidance, Volume 1, Number
1, December 1992.
See 0113
Status of Regional Superfund Pilots: End-of-
Year Report.
See 0309
Status of State Involvement in the Superfund
Program, FY 80  to FY 89.
See 0114
Streamlined Approach for Settlements with
De  Minimis  Waste   Contributors  under
CERCLA Section 122(g)(1)(A).
See 0870
Streamlining the RI/FS  for CERCLA Munici-
pal Landfill Sites.
See 1118
Streamlining the RI/FS  for CERCLA Munici-
pal Landfill Sites.
See 1119
Structure and Components of Five-Year Re-
views.
See 1120
Structure and Components of Five-Year Re-
views.
See 1121
Submittal  of Ten-Point Settlement Analyses
for CERCLA Consent Decrees.
See 0871
Subsurface Contamination Reference Guide.
See 1474
Suggested ROD  Language   for  Various
Ground Water Remediation Options.
See 1475
Summary of GIS Support to Superfund.
See 1307
Summary of 'Guidance  of Landowner Liabil-
ity under Section 107(a)1  of CERCLA, De
Minimis    Settlements    under    Section
122(g)(1)(b) of  CERCLA,  and Settlements
with Prospective Purchasers of Contaminat-
ed Property'.
See 0872
Summary of 'Guidance on CERCLA Section
106(a) UAOs for RD/RA'.
See 0873
Summary of 'Guidance on Documenting De-
cisions Not to Take Cost Recovery Actions'.
See 0874
Summary of 'Interim Guidance: Streamlining
the CERCLA Settlement Decision Process'.
See 0875
Summary of 'Interim Guidelines for Preparing
NBARs'.
See 0876
Summary of 'Interim Policy on CERCLA Set-
tlements Involving Municipalities and Munici-
pal Wastes'.
See 0877
Summary of 'Methodologies for Implementa-
tion  of CERCLA Section 122(g)(1)(a) De
Minimis Waste Contributor Settlements'.
See 0878
Summary  of  'Notification of Out-of-State
Shipments of Superfund Site Wastes'.
See 0438
Summary  of  'PRP  Search  Supplemental
Guidance for Sites in the Superfund Remedi-
al Program'.
See 0879
Summary of 'Releasing Information to Poten-
tially Responsible Parties at CERCLA Sites'.
See 0880
Summary  of Treatment Technology Effec-
tiveness for Contaminated Soil.
See 1533
Superfund  Accelerated   Cleanup Bulletin:
Presumptive Remedies for Municipal Landfill
Sites. Volume 2, Number 1, February  1993.
See 0115
Superfund  Accelerated   Cleanup Bulletin:
Presumptive Remedies for Wood  Treatment
Facilities. Volume 1, Number 2,  May  1992.
See 0116
Superfund  Accelerated   Cleanup Bulletin.
Volume 1, Number 1. Presumptive Remedies
for Municipal Landfill Sites.
See 0117
Superfund  Accelerated   Cleanup Bulletin.
Volume 1, Number 3.  Presumptive Reme-
dies.
See 0118
Superfund  Accelerated  Cleanup   Model
(SACM).
See 0119
Superfund   Accelerated  Cleanup   Model
(SACM) Coordination Strategy.
See 0120
Superfund   Accelerated  Cleanup   Model
(SACM).  Volume 1, Number 4,  November
1992.
See 0122
Superfund  Administrative Improvements. Ex-
ecutive Summary.
See 0310
Superfund   Administrative   Improvements.
Final Report.
See 0311
Superfund   Administrative   Improvements:
Reinventing Superfund.
See 0312
Superfund  Analytical Review and Oversight.
See 0995
Superfund and Small Waste Contributors.
See 0881
Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Clean-
up Efforts Nationwide (Bog Creek  Farm).
See 0940
Superfund  at Work: Hazardous Waste Clean-
up Efforts Nationwide (City Industries).
See 0941
Superfund  at Work: Hazardous Waste Clean-
up Efforts  Nationwide, Fall 1992. (American
Thermostat Corporation, New York).
See 0942
Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Clean-
up Efforts Nationwide, Fall 1992. (Celanese
Corporation Site Profile).
See 0943
Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Clean-
up Efforts Nationwide, Fall 1992. (Ciba-Geigy
Corporation, Mclntosh, Alabama).
See 0944
Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Clean-
up Efforts Nationwide, Fail 1992. (Krysowaty
Farm, Hillsborough, New Jersey).
See 0945
Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Clean-
up  Efforts  Nationwide,  Fall  1992. (Lans-
downe Radioactive  Residence Site Profile).
See 0946
Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Clean-
up Efforts Nationwide, Fall  1992. (Valley of
the Drums,  Bullitt County, Kentucky).
See 0947
Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Clean-
up  Efforts  Nationwide,  Fall  1992.  (Wide
Beach Section of Brant, New York).
See 0948
Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Clean-
up  Efforts  Nationwide,  Fall  1993 (Big D
Campground Site Profile, Ashtabula County,
Kingsville, Ohio).
See 0949
Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Clean-
up  Efforts  Nationwide,  Fall  1993 (Brown
Wood  Preserving  Site  Profile,  Suwanee
County, Florida).
See 0950
Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Clean-
up Efforts Nationwide, Fall 1993 (Bunker Hill
Site  Profile, Silver Valley, Northern Idaho).
See 0951
Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Clean-
up  Efforts  Nationwide,  Fall  1993 (Johns-
Manville Site Profile,  Illinois).
See 0952
Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Clean-
up Efforts Nationwide (McKin Company).
See 0953
Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Clean-
up Efforts Nationwide, Spring 1993 (French
Limited Site Profile, Harris County, Texas).
See 0954
Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Clean-
up Efforts  Nationwide, Spring  1993 (Fulton
Terminals Site Profile, Oswego County,  NY).
See 0955
Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Clean-
up Efforts  Nationwide, Spring 1993 (Harvey
and  Knott  Drum Site, New Castle County,
Delaware).
See 0956
Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Clean-
up Efforts Nationwide, Spring 1993  (Old Mid-
land Products Site Profile, Yell County, Ar-
kansas).
See 0957
Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Clean-
up Efforts Nationwide, Spring 1993 (Powers-
ville Site Profile, Peach County, Georgia).
See 0958
Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Clean-
up Efforts  Nationwide, Spring 1993 (Radium
Chemical Site Profile, Queens, New York).
See 0959
Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Clean-
up Efforts  Nationwide, Spring 1993 (Triana/
Tennessee River Site, Alabama).
See 0960
Superfund  at Work: Hazardous Waste Clean-
up Efforts  Nationwide,  Spring 1993 (United
Chrome Products Site Profile).
See 0961
                                                                                                                          SU-99

-------
 SUPERFUND
   1" Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Clean-
    up Efforts Nationwide. Summer 1993 (Army
    Crook Landfill Site Profile, New Castle, Dela-
    ware).
   ........          , .....   _   ........ „   ............. :
    SupWfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Clean-
   : up Efforts Nationwide, Summer 1993 (Chis-
   " man Crock Site Profile, York County, Virgin-
    ia).
    Sea 0963
    Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Clean-
    up Efforts Nationwide, Summer 1993  (Coal
    Creek Site Profile, Chehalis, Washington).
    Sea 0964
   ..... Suporfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Clean-
   | Op  Efforts   Nationwide,  Summer   1993
    (Common Steps in the Removal Process).
    See 0965
    Suporfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Clean-
    up Efforts Nationwide, Summer 1993 (East-
    am Diversified Metals Site Profile, Schuylkill
    County, Pennsylvania).
    See 0966
    Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Clean-
    up Efforts Nationwide, Summer 1993 (Fike/
   -Mel Chemical Site Profile, Nitro, West Vir-
    Sea 0967 ...........................
   '- Supoffund at Work: Hazardous Waste Clean-
   !!! up Efforts Nationwide, Summer 1993 (North-
   ; side Landfill Site Pjofile, Spokane, Washing-
   ; ton).
    See 0968
   i Suportund at Work: Hazardous Waste Clean-
   i Op Efforts Nationwide, Summer 1993 (Rogue
    Valtey/Ditcn  Creek  Ranch   Site  Profile,
   t Winter, Oregon).
    8000969
   | Suporfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Clean-
   flip  Efforts  Nationwide, Summer 1993  (Tri-
   ..... -State  Plating Site  Profile,  Columbus,  Indi-
   ilrta).
   ,-,'See, 0970
   , Suporfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Clean-
    up Efforts Nationwide (White Chemical).
    See 0971
    Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Clean-
   : up Efforts Nationwide, Winter 1993. (Wells G
    and H Site, Wobum, Massachusetts).
    Soe 0972
    Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Clean-
    up Efforts Nationwide, Winter 1994 (Bailey
    Waste Disposal Site Profile, Texas).
    See 0973
    Sgporfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Clean-
    up  Efforts  Nationwide, Winter  1994 (New
    Brighton  Site Profile, Minneapolis/St.  Paul,
    Minnesota).
    Sea 0974
    Superfund at Work; Hazardous Waste Clean-
    up  Efforts  Nationwide, Winter  1994 (Sey-
    mour Recycling  Site Profile, Seymour, Indi-
    ana),
    See 0975
    Suporfund Contracts Management Issues.
    Sea 0072 [[[
   ""Superfund" Cost Recovery Strategy."
   Sea 0882
    Superfund Desk Reference for Municipali-
   "tl0t.
   !_Sf«0486
    Supwfund  Docket  Operations  Manual for
    Rutemaktng Activities.
    Sea 0081
    Suporfund Emergency Response Actions: A
   ..... Surnmary  of  Federally-Funded Removals.
    Fifth Annual Report - Fiscal Year 1990.
   Sea 0313
   Suporfund Emergency Response Actions: A
   -Surnrrtary  of  Federally Funded Removals.
   Fourth  Annual Report -  Fiscal  Year 1989.
   See 0314
       SUBJECT  INDEX
 Superfund Emergency Response Actions: A
 Summary of  Federally-Funded  Removals.
 Sixth Annual Report, Fiscal Year 1991.
 See 0315
 Superfund Enforcement Strategy and Imple-
 mentation Plan.
 See 0883
 Superfund Engineering Issue: Considerations
 for Evaluating the Impact of Metals Partition-
 ing during the Incineration' of Contaminated
 Soils from Superfund Sites.
 See 1534
 Superfund Engineering Issue: Issues Affect-
 ing the Applicability and Success of Remedi-
 al/Removal Incineration Projects.
 See 1308
 Superfund Engineering  Issue: Treatment of
 Lead-Contaminated Soils.
 See 1535
 Superfund: Environmental Progress.
 See 0976
 Superfund: EPA/ICMA Superfund Revitaliza-
 tion Conference. Held in Chicago, Illinois on
 November 12-13, 1992.
 See 0319
 Superfund: EPA/ICMA Superfund Revitaliza-
 tion Conference.  Held in San  Francisco,
 California on February 1-2, 1993.
 See 0320
 Superfund Fact Sheet: An Overview.
 See 0487
 Superfund Fact Sheet: Arsenic.
 See 0488
 Superfund Fact Sheet: Benzene.
 See 0489
 Superfund  Fact Sheet: Community  Inter-
 views.
 See 0490
 Superfund Fact Sheet: Exposure Pathways.
 See 0393
 Superfund Fact Sheet: Identifying Sites.
 See 0491
 Superfund Fact Sheet: PCBs.
 See 0492
 Superfund Fact Sheet: Public Involvement.
 See 0493
 Superfund Fact Sheet: The Remedial Pro-
 gram.
 See 0494
 Superfund Fact Sheet: The Removal Pro-
 gram.
 See 0495
 Superfund Fact Sheet: Trichloroethylene.
 See 0496
 SUPERFUND:  Focusing  on the Nation at
 Large.  A Decade of Progress  at  National
 Priorities List Sites.
 See 0321
 Superfund: Focusing on the Nation at Large.
 A  Decade of Progress at  National  Priorities
 List Sites.
 See 0322
 Superfund: Focusing on the Nation at Large.
 1991 Update.
 See 0323
 Superfund Ground Water Issue. Contaminant
 Transport in Fractured Media:  Models for
 Decision Makers.
 See 1477
 Superfund Guide: Clean Air  Act  Hazardous
 Air Pollutants Added to the List of CERCLA
 Hazardous Substances.
 See 1151
 Superfund Guide: Reportable Quantity Ad-
justment for Methyl Isocyanate (MIC).
See  1152
Superfund Guide to RCRA Management Re-
quirements for Mineral Processing  Wastes.
See 0439
                             .
Superfund Information Repositories and Ad-
ministrative Records:  Introduction for Librar-
ians.
See 0497
Superfund Information Repositories and Ad-
ministrative Records.
See 0884
Superfund Innovative  Technology Evaluation
Program: Annual Report to Congress 1992.
See 1309
Superfund Innovative  Technology Evaluation
Program Demonstration  Plan  for Westing-
house   Bio-Analytic  Systems  Pentachloro-
phenol Immunoassays.
See 1310
Superfund Innovative  Technology Evaluation
Program: Spring  Update to the Technology
Profiles. Fourth Edition.
See 1314
Superfund Innovative  Technology Evaluation
Program:  Technology  Profiles,  November
1989.
See 1317
Superfund Innovative  Technology Evaluation
Program: Technology  Profiles,  Sixth  Edition.
See 1318
Superfund Innovative  Technology Evaluation
Technology Demonstration Summary: Chem-
fix Solidification/Stabilization Process, Clack-
amas, Oregon.
See 1564
Superfund  Innovative Technology  Evalua-
tion: The Delaware SITE Study, 1989.
See 1322
Superfund LDR Guide No. 1: Overview of
RCRA Land Disposal Restrictions (LDRs).
See 0440
Superfund LDR Guide No. 2: Complying with
the California List Restrictions under Land
Disposal Restrictions (LDRs).
See 0441
Superfund  LDR  Guide  No.  3:  Treatment
Standards and  Minimum Technology  Re-
quirements under Land Disposal Restrictions
(LDRS).
See 0442
Superfund LDR Guide No. 4: Complying with
the Hammer  Restrictions under Land Dis-
posal Restrictions (LDRs).
See 0443
Superfund LDR Guide  No. 5:  Determining
When Land Disposal Restrictions (LDRs) Are
'Applicable' to CERCLA  Response Actions.
See 0444
Superfund LDR Guide No. 6A  (2nd  Edition)
Obtaining a Soil and Debris Treatability Vari-
ance for Remedial Actions.
See 0445
Superfund LDR Guide  No. 7.  Determining
When Land Disposal Restrictions (LDRs) Are
Relevant and Appropriate to  CERCLA  Re-
sponse Actions.
See 0446
Superfund Policy Forum  Update, Volume 1,
Number 1, February 1992.
See 0324
Superfund Program and Information Man-
agement Update. Volume 1, Number 1, No-
vember 1993.
See 0123
Superfund Program Implementation Manual,
Fiscal Year 1994. Volume 1. Program Goals
and Planning Requirements. Volume  2. Pro-
gram Implementation Procedures.
See 0124

-------
                                                    SUBJECT INDEX
                                                                       SUPERFUND
Superfund Program: Ten Years of Progress.
See 0977
Superfund Progress  - Aficionado's  Version
(Progress as of March 31,1992).
See 0326
Superfund Progress. Aficionado's  Version.
Progress as of September 30,1992.
See 0327
Superfund Progress: Fall/Winter 1992.
See 0328
Superfund Progress, Spring 1992.
See 0329
Superfund Progress, Summer 1992.
See 0330
Superfund:  Qualified  Disadvantaged Busi-
ness Utilization in State Response.
See 0498
Superfund Reauthorization: NACEPT Sub-
committee Handbook.
See 0331
Superfund Reform Act of 1994.
See 0332
Superfund Remedial Action Decision Proc-
ess: Database for Selected FY87 Records of
Decision.
See 1136
Superfund Remedial Program Financial Man-
agement Authority, Responsibilities and Pro-
cedures.
See 1137
Superfund  Removal  Procedures:   Action
Memorandum Guidance.
See 1012
Superfund Removal  Procedures: Guidance
on the Consideration of ARARS  during  Re-
moval Actions.
See 1013
Superfund Removal Procedures: Public Par-
ticipation Guidance for On-Scene Coordina-
tors: Community Relations and the Adminis-
trative Record.
See 1014
Superfund  Removal Procedures: Removal
Enforcement Guidance for On-Scene Coordi-
nators.
See 1015
Superfund: Report of  the  EPA Superfund
Revitalization Public  Meeting  Held  on June
24,1992. Volumes 1  and 2.
See 0333
Superfund Response Action Contracts.
See 0074
Superfund Responsiveness Summaries (Su-
perfund Management Review: Recommen-
dation Number 43E).
See 0125
Superfund Revitalization:  Measures of Sue-
See 0334
Superfund Strategic Plan and Implementa-
tion Strategy Fiscal Year 1994.
See 0126
Superfund Strategic Plan and Implementa-
tion Strategy Fiscal  Year 1994:  Office and
Division Plans.
See 0127
Superfund   Technical  Assistance  Grant
(TAG) Handbook.
See 0499
Superfund   Technical  Assistance  Grant
(TAG)  Handbook: Applying for Your Grant.
See 0500
Superfund   Technical  Assistance ' Grant
(TAG)  Handbook:  The  Application  Forms
with Instructions.
See 0501
Superfund Technical Assistance Grants.
See 0502
Superfund   Technical  Assistance  Grants
(Fact Sheet).
See 0503
Superfund  Technical  Assistance   Grants
(TAGs) (Pamphlet).
See 0505
Supplemental Guidance on Federal Super-
fund Liens.
See 0885
Supplemental Guidance on Performing Risk
Assessments in Remedial Investigation/Fea-
sibility Studies (RI/FSs). Conducted by Po-
tentially Responsible Parties (PRPs).
See 1078
Supplemental Guidance to RAGS: Calculat-
ing  the  Concentration Term.  Volume  1,
Number 1, May 1992.
See 1079
Supplemental Guide to Video on Superfund
Site Assessment  Screening: A National Pri-
ority.
See 0394
Supporting    State    Attorneys   General
CERCLA  Remedial  and Enforcement Activi-
ties at NPL Sites.
See 0506
Tech Trends Number 3, December 1990.
See 1325
Tech Trends Number 4, March 1991.
See 1326
Tech Trends Number 5, May 1991.
See 1327
Tech Trends Number 9, June 1992.
See 1329
Tech Trends (Number 10).
See 1330
Tech Trends (Number 11).
See 1331
Tech  Trends: The Applied  Technologies
Journal for Superfund Removals and Reme-
dial Actions  and  RCRA Corrective  Actions,
December 1993.
See 1332
Tech  Trends: The Applied  Technologies
Journal for Superfund Removals and Reme-
dial Actions  and  RCRA Corrective  Actions.
May 1993.
See 1333
Technical Assistance Team (TAT) Contracts
Users' Manual.
See 0075
Technical  Background Document for  Draft
Soil Screening Level Guidance.
See 1537
Technical Guidance Document: Construction
Quality Management for  Remedial Action
and  Remedial Design Waste' Containment
Systems.
See 1334
Technical  Support  Services for Superfund
Site Remediation. Second Edition.
See 1335
Technology  Demonstration  Summary: Bio
Trol Soil Washing System for Treatment of a
Wood Preserving  Site.
See 1538
Technology    Demonstration    Summary,
DuPont/Oberlin  Microfiltration System, Pal-
merton, Pennsylvania. April-May 1992.
See 1336
Technology  Evaluation Report: Biotrol Soil
Washing  System for Treatment of  a Wood
Preserving Site. Volume 1.
See 1539
Technology  Evaluation Report: Biotrol Soil
Washing  System for Treatment of  a Wood
Preserving Site. Volume 2, Part A.
See 1540
Technology  Evaluation Report: Biotrol Soil
Washing  System for Treatment of  a Wood
Preserving Site. Volume 2, Part B.
See 1541
Technology  Evaluation  Report  CHEMFIX
Technologies,  Inc.,  Solidification/Stabiliza-
tion Process, Clackamas, Oregon. Volume 2.
See 1339
Technology  Evaluation  Report:,  Chemfix
Technologies, Inc. Solidification/Stabilization
Process, Clackamas, Oregon. Volume 1.
See 1566
Technology Evaluation Report: International
Waste Technologies/Geo-Con In situ Stabili-
zation/Solidification.   Volume  3.  Update
Report.
See 1567
Technology Evaluation  Report of Retech's
Plasma Centrifugal Furnace. Volume 1.
See 1342
Technology Evaluation  Report of Retech's
Plasma Centrifugal Furnace. Volume 2.
See 1343
Technology Evaluation Report: Ogden Circu-
lating Bed Combustor at the McColl Super-
fund Site.
See 1344
Technology  Evaluation  Report:  Pilot-Scale
Demonstration  of a  Slurry-Phase Biological
Reactor  for  Creosote-Contaminated  Soil.
Volume 1.
See 1542
Technology  Evaluation  Report:  SITE  Pro-
gram  Demonstration. EPA RREL's Mobile
Volume Reduction Unit.
See 1348
Technology Evaluation Report: Site  Program
Demonstration  of a  Trial Excavation at the
McColl Superfund Site.
See 1349
Technology  Evaluation  Report:  SITE  Pro-
gram Demonstration of the DuPont/Oberlin
Microfiltration Technology.
See 1350
Technology  Evaluation Report:  SITE  Pro-
gram  Demonstration Test Horsehead  Re-
source Development Company, Inc., Flame
Reactor Technology, Monaca, Pennsylvania.
See 1353
Technology  Evaluation Report.  SITE  Pro-
gram  Demonstration, Resources Conserva-
tion  Company,  Basic  Extractive  Sludge
Treatment (B.E.S.T.  (Trade  Name)), Grand
Calumet River, Gary, Indiana. Volume 1.
See 1593
Technology  Evaluation Report.  SITE  Pro-
gram  Demonstration, Resources Conserva-
tion  Company,  Basic  Extractive  Sludge
Treatment (B.E.S.T.  (Trade  Name)), Grand
Calumet River, Gary, Indiana. Volume 2. Part
1.
See 1594
Technology  Evaluation Report.  SITE  Pro-
gram  Demonstration, Resources Conserva-
tion  Company,  Basic  Extractive  Sludge
Treatment (B.E.S.T. (Trade Name)), Grant
Calumet River, Gary, Indiana. Volume 2. Part
2.
See 1595
Technology  Evaluation Report.  SITE Pro-
gram  Demonstration, Resources Conserva-
tion  Company,  Basic  Extractive  Sludge
Treatment (B.E.S.T. (Trade  Name)), Grand
Calumet River, Gary, Indiana. Volume 2. Part
3.
See 1596
Technology Selection Guide for Wood Treat-
er Sites.
See 1122
Thermal  Desorption  Treatment  (February
1994).
See 1487
                                                                                                                        SU-101

-------
 SUf ERFUND ACCELERATED CLEANUP MODEL      SUBJECT INDEX
    Tlmoly  Initiation  of  Responsible   Party
    Soafcbes,  Issuance of Notice Letters, and
    RelMM of Information (Attachment XXII).
    Toronto Harbour Commissioners (THC) Soil
   I .Recycle treatment Train. Applications Analy-
   ijajs Report
   ';€•• 1544
    Total Quality Management (TQM) and Qual-
   i tty Assurance (QA) in Superfund.
    3090996
   'Tbxte   Treatments  'In-situ'  Steam/Hot-Air
    Stripping Technology, Applications Analysis
    Report.
    See 1545
    Toxfcologteal  Assessment  of  Hazardous
   : Wastes.
    SCO 1358
    Toxicologtcal          Profile         for
    B«nzo(b}Flooranthene.
    Sa«1360
    transmittal  of Guidance  on Use  and En-
   ;_fOfC8mflnt of CERCLA.Mprmation Requests
   I and .AdrnWstrativi Subpoenas.
    See 0887
    Transmittal  of Model Consent Decree for
    CERCLA Section  104(e)  Information  Re-
    quest Enforcement Actons.
   •See 0888 .....................
    Transmittal  of the Rnal Waste Oil Interim
    Enforcement Outdance Document.
    See 0889
    Treatability Studtes Contractor Work Assign-
    ments.
    §«e 0076
   fffeataWty  Studtes  Under  CERCLA: An
    Overview.
    Se«1172
    U.S. Bureau of Reclamation Assistance to
    the Superfund Program.
    Soa 1138
    Ultrox International Ultraviolet Radiation/Oxi-
    dation  Technology:  Applications  Analysis
    Report.
    SC91364
    Undorstanding Superfund  Risk Assessment.
    See 0508
    Unitod   States  Environmental  Protection
    Agency  Model CERCLA  RD/RA  Consent
    Decree.
   ""§900890
    Update No.  2 to 'Procedures for Completion
    arid Dotation of NPL Sites'.
    S«(I 0395
    Update on Implementation of the Oil Pollu-
    tion Act of 1990. Volume 1, Number 1, Feb-
    ruary 1991.
    See 0936
    Update on Implementation of the Oil Pollu-
    tion Act of 1990. Volume 1, Number 2, April
    1991.
   .SM.0937
    Update on Implementation of the Oil Pollu-
    tion Act of 1990. Volume 1, Number 3, June
    1991.
    Sou 0938
    USACe  Preptaced  and  Rapid Response
    Contracts.
    Sea 1139
    Use of a Fourier Transform Spectrometer as
    a Remote Sensor at Superfund Sites.
    Seo 1365
    Uso of  CERCLA Section 106 Unilateral En-
    forcement for Remedial Design and Remedi-
    al Action: Strategy for Fiscal Year 1990.
    Soo 0891
   :P«e of  IRIS Values In Superfund Risk As-
    sessment.
    Soo 1081


SU-102
    Use  of Office  of  Research  and Develop-
    ment's  Bioremediation Expertise in Super-
    fund Removal Program.
    See 1016
    Use of Removal Approaches to Speed Up
    Remedial Action Projects.
    See 1140
    Use of Time and Materials and Cost Reim-
    bursement Subcontracts for  Remedial  Ac-
    tions under the Alternative Remedial Con-
    tracting Strategy Contracts.
    See 1141
    USEPA Contract Laboratory Program Nation-
    al  Functional Guidelines for  Organic Data
    Review.
    See 0077
    USEPA Contract Laboratory Program Nation-
    al  Functional Guidelines for Inorganic Data
    Review.
    See 0997
    User's Guide to the Contract Laboratory Pro-
    gram.
    See 0079
    User's Guide to the Contract Laboratory Pro-
    gram.
    See 0080
    Using State and Local Officials to Assist in
    Community  Relations (Superfund Manage-
    ment Review: Recommendation No. 43.K.L).
    See 0128
    Vendor Information Form to be Completed
    for Participation in  the:  Vendor Information
    System for  Innovative Treatment Technol-
    ogies (VISITT).
    See 1369
    Waiver  of Headquarters Approval for Issu-
    ance of RD/RA Special Notice Letters at the
    Time of ROD  Signature from  OERR and
    OWPE.
    See 0893
    Written  Demand for CERCLA  Cost  Recov-
    ery.
    See 0894
    Written  Demand for Recovery of Costs In-
    curred Under the Comprehensive Environ-
    mental Response, Compensation, and Liabil-
    ity Act (CERCLA).
    See 0895
SUPERFUND ACCELERATED CLEANUP
MODEL 	
    Assessing Sites under SACM: interim Guid-
    ance.  Volume  1,  Number 4,  Deccember
    1992.
    See 0084
    Early Action and Long-Term  Action  under
    SACM: Interim Guidance, Volume 1, Number
    2, December 1992.
    See 0089
    Enforcement  under SACM:  Interim  Guid-
    ance. Volume 1, Number 3, December 1992.
    See 0090
    Exercising Flexibility through the Superfund
    Accelerated Cleanup Model (SACM).
    See 0091
    Guidance  on Implementation of the  Super-
    fund  Accelerated Cleanup  Model  (SACM)
    under CERCLA and  the NCP.
    See 0094
    Regional Pilots  and Applications of  Super-
    fund Accelerated Cleanup Model (SACM).
    See 0110
    SACM  Regional Decision  Teams:  Interim
    Guidance. Volume 1,  Number 5, December
    1992.
    See 0111
    Smart Moves in Superfund - Regional Pilots
    and Initiatives.  Volume 1,  Number 2, Sep-
    tember 1992.
    See 0306
    Status of Key SACM Program Management
    Issues: Interim Guidance, Volume 1, Number
    1, December 1992.
    See 0113
    Superfund Accelerated  Cleanup  Bulletin:
    Presumptive Remedies for Municipal Landfill
    Sites. Volume 2, Number 1, February 1993.
    See 0115
    Superfund  Accelerated  Cleanup  Model
    (SACM).  Volume  1, Number 4,  November
    1992.
    See 0122
SUPERFUND ACCELERATED CLEANUP
MODEL (SACM)
    HSED SACM Report. Volume 1,  Number 1,
    January 1993.
    See 0096
SUPERFUND AMENDMENTS AND
REAUTHORIZATION ACT
    Covenants Not to Sue under SARA.
    See 0526
SUPERFUND AMENDMENTS AND
REAUTHORIZATION ACT (SARA)
    Inorganic Contract  Compliance  Screening
    System (ICCSS) Software (for Microcomput-
    ers).
    See 0034
    Inorganic Contract  Compliance  Screening
    System (ICCSS)  Software for the PC (Ver-
    sion 3/90) User Manual.
    See 0035
    Organic   Contract  Compliance  Screening
    System (OCCSS) Software  (for  Microcom-
    puters).
    See 0047
    Organic   Contract  Compliance  Screening
    System (OCCSS) Software for the PC (Ver-
    sion 2/90) User Manual.
    See 0048
SUPERFUND COMPREHENSIVE
ACCOMPLISHMENTS PLAN
    Amendment to Historical Definitions of NPL
    Deletion Start and Completion Dates.
    See 0335
SUPERFUND DATA BASE
    Hazardous Waste Superfund Collection: Da-
    tabase Thesaurus.
    See 0138
SUPERFUND DOCKET AND INFORMATION
CENTER
    Superfund  Docket Operations Manual  for
    Rulemaking Activities.
    See 0081
SUPERFUND INNOVATIVE TECHNOLOGY
EVALUATION
    Accutech Pneumatic Fracturing  Extraction
    and Hot Gas Injection, Phase 1. Applications
    Analysis Report.
    See 1190
    Demonstration of  Hazardous Waste  Site
    Treatment Technologies.
    See 1227
    Description of EPA SITE Demonstration of
    the  HAZCON  Stabilization  Process at the
    Douglassville, Pennsylvania Superfund Site.
    See 1552
    SITE Demonstration of the CHEMFIX Solidi-
    fication/Stabilization Process at the Portable
    Equipment Salvage Company Site.
    See 1559
    Superfund Innovative Technology  Evaluation
    (SITE): Demonstration Bulletin. Flame Reac-
    tor,  Horsehead   Resource  Development
    Company, Inc.
    See 1319

-------
                                                        SUBJECT INDEX
                                                                SUPERFUND PROJECT
    Technology Evaluation Report: Baboock and
    Wilcox  Cyclone  Furnace Vitrification Tech-
    nology. Volume 1.
    See 1337
    Technology Evaluation Report: Babcock and
    Wilcox  Cyclone  Furnace Vitrification Tech-
    nology. Volume 2.
    See 1338
    Technology Evaluation  Report: SITE  Pro-
    gram.   CF  Systems  Organics  Extraction
    System,  New  Bedford,  Massachusetts.
    Volume 1.
    See 1346
    Technology Evaluation  Report: SITE  Pro-
    gram.   CF  Systems  Organics  Extraction
    System,  New  Bedford,  Massachusetts.
    Volume 2.
    See 1347
SUPERFUND INNOVATIVE TECHNOLOGY
EVALUATION PROGRAM
    Babcock and Wilcox Cyclone Furnace Vitrifi-
    cation. Technology Demonstration Summary.
    See 1203
    Chemfix Technologies,  Inc.  Solidification/
    Stabilization  Process. Application Analysis
    Report.
    See 1551
    Demonstration of Waste  Treatment Technol-
    ogies.
    See 1229
    Horsehead Resource Development Compa-
    ny, Inc. Flame Reactor Technology: Applica-
    tions Analysis Report.
    See 1263
    Horsehead Resource Development Compa-
    ny, Inc., Flame Reactor Technology. Tech-
    nology Demonstration Summary.
    See 1264
    Control  Technology: Estimating  Innovative
    Technology Costs for the SITE Program.
    See 1222
    Control Technology: 1992  Update of  U.S.
    EPA's  Superfund  Innovative  Technology
    Evaluation  (SITE) Emerging Technology Pro-
    gram.
    See 1223
    Demonstration Projects Under the  U.S. EPA
    Superfund  Innovative Technology Evaluation
    Program.
    See 1230
    EPA Site Demonstration  of BioTrol Aqueous
    Treatment System.
    See 1441
    EPA SITE  Demonstration of the Horsehead
    Resource Development Company Flame Re-
    actor Technology.
    See 1242
    EPA SITE Demonstration of the International
    Waste Technologies/Geo-Con In situ Stabili-
    zation/Solidification Process.
    See 1553
    EPA Site Demonstration  of the Terra Vac In
    situ Vacuum Extraction  Process in  Grove-
    land, Massachusetts. (Site Program Update:
    Part VII).
    See 1243
    SITE Demonstration of the American Com-
    bustion Pyretron Oxygen-Enhanced Burner.
    See 1299
    SlTE-Emerging Technologies: Laser Induced
    Photochemical   Oxidative  Destruction   of
    Toxic  Organics in  Leachates and  Ground-
    waters.
    See 1591
    SITE Emerging Technologies Project:  Bab-
    cock and Wilcox Cyclone Vitrification.
    See 1303
    Superfund  Innovative Technology Evaluation
    Program: Progress and Accomplishments,
    Fiscal Year 1989. A Third  Report to Con-
    gress.
    See 1311
    Superfund Innovative Technology Evaluation
    Program:  Progress  and  Accomplishments,
    Fiscal Year  1990. A Fourth Report to Con-
    gress.
    See 1312
    Superfund Innovative Technology Evaluation
    Program:  Progress   and  Accomplishments
    Fiscal Year 1991. A  5th Report to Congress.
    See 1313
    Superfund Innovative Technology Evaluation
    Program: Technology Profiles, Fifth Edition.
    See 1315
    Superfund Innovative Technology Evaluation
    Program: Technology Profiles, Fourth  Edi-
    tion.
    See 1316
    Superfund Innovative Technology Evaluation
    Program:  Technology  Profiles,  November
    1989.
    See 1317
    Technology  Evaluation Report:  SITE  Pro-
    gram  Demonstration of the  Ultrox Interna-
    tional Ultraviolet Radiation/Oxidation Tech-
    nology.
    See 1351
    Technology  Evaluation Report:  SITE  Pro-
    gram  Demonstration Test, Soliditech,  Inc.,
    Solidification/Stabilization  Process. Volume
    1.
    See 1570
    Technology  Evaluation Report:  SITE  Pro-
    gram  Demonstration Test,  Soliditech,  Inc.
    Solidification/Stabilization  Process. Volume
    2.
    See 1571
SUPERFUND INNOVATIVE TECHNOLOGY
EVALUATION PROGRAM (SITE)
    Superfund Innovative Technology Evaluation
    Program Demonstration Plan for  Westing-
    house  Bio-Analytic   Systems Pentachloro-
    phenol Immunoassays.
    See 1310
SUPERFUND PROGRAM
    Achieving  Greater   Consistency  between
    Subjective and Objective Risks.
    See 1017
    Air/Superfund National Technical  Guidance
    Series. Superfund  Air  Pathway  Analyses
    Review Criteria Checklists.
    See 1372
    Air/Superfund National Technical  Guidance
    Study Series. Comparisons of Air Stripper
    Simulations and Field Performance  Data.
    See 1376
    American Combustion  Pyretron  Destruction
    System. Applications Analysis Report.
    See 1193
    ARCS (Alternative Remedial Contract Strate-
    gy) Contracts Users' Manual.
    See 0019
    Assessment  of  International  Technologies
    for   Superfund  Applications:   Technology
    Review and Trip  Report Results.
    See 1197
    Assessment of Technologies for the Reme-
    diation of Radioactively Contaminated Su-
    perfund Sites.
    See 1198
    Community  Relations  during Enforcement
    Activities and Development of the Adminis-
    trative Record.
    See 0465
    Guidelines for Effective Management of the
    Contract Laboratory Program. Part 1.  Con-
    tract Award. Part 2. Contract Administration.
    See 0028
    Health  Effects   Assessment    Summary
    Tables.
    See 1051
    Health   Effects   Assessment   Summary
   . Tables.
    See 1052
    Health   Effects   Assessment   Summary
    Tables.
    See 1053
    Health Effects Assessment Summary Tables
    Fourth Quarter FY 1989.
    See 1054
    Identification  of  SARA (Superfund  Amend-
    ments and Reauthorization Act) Compounds
    in Adipose Tissue.
    See 1055
    In-situ  Stabilization/Solidification  of  PCS
    (Polychlorinated    BiphenylsJ-Contaminated
    Soil.
    See 1556
    Management Review of the Superfund Pro-
    gram.
    See 0101
    Management Review of the Superfund Pro-
    gram: Implementation Plan.
    See 0102
    Evaluation of Modifications to Extraction Pro-
    cedures  Used in Analysis of Environmental
    Samples from Superfund Sites.
    See 1247
    Review and Evaluation of Area Source Dis-
    persion Algorithms for Emission Sources at
    Superfund Sites.
    See 1416
    Risk  Assessment Guidance  for Superfund.
    Volume 1. Human Health Evaluation Manual.
    Part A.
    See 1065
    Risk  Assessment Guidance  for Superfund.
    Volume 2. Environmental Evaluation Manual.
    See 1072
    Superfund Emergency Response Actions: A
    Summary  of  Federally-Funded Removals.
    Volume 1.
    See 0316
    Superfund Emergency Response Actions: A
    Summary  of  Federally-Funded Removals.
    Volume 2.
    See 0317
    Superfund Emergency Response Actions: A
    Summary of Federally Funded Removals.
    Volume 3.
    See 0318
    Superfund Ground Water Issue: Accuracy of
    Depth  to  Water  Measurements.  2nd  in
    Series of Issue Papers.
    See 1476
    Superfund Technical Assistance Grants Pro-
    gram: Regional Guidance Manual.
    See 0504
    Terra Vac In situ Vacuum Extraction System:
    Applications Analysis Report.
    See 1355
    Terra Vac In situ Vacuum  Extraction System:
    Applications Analysis Report.
    See 1356
    Toxicity  Bioassay and Eluate Heavy Metals
    Analysis Results of the Bench Scale Stabili-
    zation  Study of  Soils  from   the  United
    Chrome  Superfund NPL (National  Priority
    List) Site Corvallis, Oregon.
    See 1546
    User's  Guide to Contract  Laboratory Pro-
    gram.
    See 0078
SUPERFUND PROJECT
    Technology Evaluation Report SITE Program
    Demonstration Test, HAZCON Solidification,
    Douglassville, Pennsylvania. Volume 1.
    See 1569
                                                                                                                            SU-103

-------
SUPERFUND SITE
SUPERFUND SITE
    Hydfogeotogy and Results of Aquifer Tests
    Jo the Vicinity of a Hazardous-Waste Dispos-
    al Sita Near Byron, Illinois.
    Sea 1463
SUPERFUND SITES
    Evaluation  of Personal Cooling Devices for
    Dioxin C!oan-Up Operation.
   ,S
-------
                                                       SUBJECT INDEX
                                                                 TOXIC SUBSTANCES
    National Priorities List  Sites:  Tennessee,
    1992.
    See 0271
    Site Enforcement Tracking System  (SETS):
    PRP Listing by Site for Tennessee.
    See 0796
    Site Enforcement Tracking System  (SETS):
    PRP Listing by Site for Tennessee.
    See 0797
   , Site Enforcement Tracking System  (SETS):
    PRP Listing by Site for Tennessee.
    See 0798
TENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS
    Assessment of Tentatively Identified Com-
    pounds in Superfund Samples.
    See 1199
TERMINOLOGY
    Hazardous  Waste Superfund  Collection: Da-
    tabase Thesaurus.
    See 0138
TERRA VAC IN SITU VACUUM EXTRACTION
SYSTEMS
    Terra Vac In situ Vacuum Extraction  System:
    Applications Analysis Report.
    See 1356
TERRA VAC SYSTEM
    EPA Site Demonstration  of the Terra Vac In
    situ Vacuum  Extraction  Process  in Grove-
    land, Massachusetts. (Site Program  Update:
    Part VII).
    See 1243
TERRESTRIAL ECOSYSTEMS
    Evaluation of Terrestrial Indicators for Use in
 ,i.  Ecological   Assessments   at   Hazardous
    Waste Sites.
    See 1249
TEST CHAMBERS
    Operations and  Research at the U.S. EPA
    Incineration  Research   Facility:   Annual
    Report for FY89.
    See 1482
TEST FACILITIES
    Risk Reduction Engineering Laboratory Site
    Remediation  Technical  Support Program:
    FY92 Annual Report.
    See 1296
TESTS
    Compendium of ERT Toxicity Testing Proce-
    dures.
    See 0906
TETRACHLOROETHYLENE
    Health  Effects  Assessment  for Tetrachlor-
    oethylene.
    See 1047
TEXAS
    Estimating  VOC Emissions from Superfund
    Sites in the Houston-Galveston Texas Area.
    (NNEMS Project No. 1302).
    See 1406
    National Priorities List Sites: Texas.
    See 0272
    National Priorities List Sites: Texas.
   ' See 0273
    National Priorities List  Sites: Texas, 1992.
    See 0274
    Site Enforcement Tracking System  (SETS):
    PRP Listing by Site for Texas.
    See 0799
    Site Enforcement Tracking System  (SETS):
    PRP Listing by Site for Texas.
    See 0800
    Site Enforcement Tracking System  (SETS):
    PRP Listing by Site for Texas.
    See 0801
    Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Clean-
    up Efforts  Nationwide, Spring 1993  (French
    Limited Site Profile, Harris County, Texas).
    See 0954
THERMAL DEGRADATION
    On-Site  Engineering  Report for  the  Low-
    Temperature Thermal Desorption Pilot-Scale
    Test on Contaminated Soil.
    See 1519
THERMAL DESORPTION
    Estimation of Air Impacts for Thermal De-
    sorption  Units Used at Superfund Sites. Air/
    Superfund  National   Technical  Guidance
    Study Series.
    See 1409
    Guide for Conducting Treatability  Studies
    under   CERCLA:   Thermal   Desorption
    Remedy Selection. Interim Guidance.
    See 1170
    Tech  Trends:  The  Applied  Technologies
    Journal for Superfund Removals and Reme-
    dial Actions and  RCRA Corrective Actions.
    May 1993.
    See 1333
    Thermal  Desorption   Treatment  (February
    1994).
    See 1487
THERMAL ENVIRONMENTS
    Removal of Creosote  from Soil by Thermal
    Desorption.
    See 1530
    Thermal Desorption Treatment.
    See 1357
THERMAL REACTORS
    Horsehead Resource Development  Compa-
    ny, Inc. Flame Reactor Technology: Applica-
    tions Analysis Report.
    See 1263
    EPA SITE Demonstration of  the Horsehead
    Resource Development Company Flame Re-
    actor Technology.
    See 1242
    Superfund Innovative Technology Evaluation
    (SITE): Demonstration Bulletin. Flame Reac-
    tor,  Horsehead   Resource  Development
    Company, Inc.
    See 1319
THERMAL RECOVERY METHODS
    EPA SITE Demonstration of  the Horsehead
    Resource Development Company Flame Re-
    actor Technology.
    See 1242
THESAURI
    Hazardous Waste Superfund Collection: Da-
    tabase Thesaurus.
    See 0138
TORONTO (CANADA)
    Technology Evaluation Report Toronto Har-
    bour Commissioners  (THC)  Soil  Recycle
    Treatment Train.
    See 1543
TOXIC HAZARDS
    Dealing with Toxic Polluted Sediments in the
    Great Lakes Basin.
    See 1582
TOXIC SUBSTANCES
    Air/Superfund National Technical Guidance
    Study Series: Estimation  of Air Impacts for
    Air Stripping of Contaminated Water.
    See 1382
    Air  Superfund National Technical Guidance
    Study Series. Estimation  of Air Impacts for
    the Excavation of Contaminated Soil.
    See 1384
    Air/Superfund National Technical Guidance
    Study Series. Guideline for Predictive Base-
    line Emissions Estimation Procedures for Su-
    perfund Sites.
    See 1387
Air Superfund National Technical. Guidance
Study Series. Screening Procedures for Esti-
mating the Air Impacts of Incineration at Su-
perfund Sites.
See 1389
CERCLA Compliance with the RCRA Toxici-
ty Characteristics (TG) Rule: Part 2.
See 0412
Ecosystem  Effects  of  Superfund.  National
Priority List Sites in Industrial Landscapes: A
Framework for Policy Decisions.
See 0135
Engineering Bulletin: Air  Pathway  Analysis.
See 1404
Guidance  for Coordinating ATSDR  Health
Assessment  Activities  with  the Superfund
Remedial Process.
See 1029
Guidelines for the Cleanup  of  Clandestine
Drug Laboratories.
See 1007
Health and Safety Audit Guidelines: SARA
Title I, Section 126.
See 0916
Health Effects Assessment for Benzene.
See 1035
Health Effects Assessment for Cadmium.
See 1036
Health Effects Assessment for Carbon Tet-
rachloride.
See 1037
Health Effects Assessment for Chlordane.
See 1038
Health  Effects Assessment  for Chloroben-
zene.
See 1039
Health Effects Assessment for  Chloroform.
See 1040
Health Effects Assessment for DDT.
See 1041
Health Effects Assessment for Methyl  Ethyl
Ketone.
See 1042
Health  Effects  Assessment for Methylene
Chloride.
See 1043
Health Effects Assessment for Naphthalene.
See 1044
Health Effects Assessment for Phenol.
See 1045
Health Effects Assessment for Styrene.
See 1046
Health  Effects Assessment for Tetrachlor-
oethylene.
See 1047
Health Effects Assessment for Trichloroethy-
lene.
See 1048
Health Effects Assessment for Xylenes.
See 1049
Health Effects Assessment for 2,4,5-Trichlor-
ophenoxy Acetic Acid (2,4,5-T).
See 1050
Notification of Hazardous Waste Sites Re-
quired Under Section 103(c) of the Compre-
hensive  Environmental Response,  Compen-
sation and Liability  Act  (CERCLA) of 1980:
EPA Region 1.
See 1174
Notification of Hazardous Waste Sites Re-
quired Under Section 103(c) of the Compre-
hensive  Environmental Response,  Compen-
sation and Liability  Act  (CERCLA) of 1980:
EPA Region 2.
See 1175
                                                                                                                           SU-105

-------
 TOXICITY
           SUBJECT INDEX
   , Notification of Hazardous Waste Sites Re-
    quired Under Section 103(c) of the Compre-
   i hensive Environmental Response, Compen-
   j satlon and liabipty Act (CERCLA) of 1980:
    EPARegton'3. ......
    See 1176
   j .Notification of Hazardous Waste Sites Re-
    quired Under Section 103{c) of the Compre-
   . .hensive Envjrqnmental Response, Compen-
    sation and liability Act (CERCLA) of 1980:
    EPA Region 4.
    See 1177
    Notification of Hazardous Waste Sites Re-
    quired Under Section 103(c) of the Compre-
    hensive Environmental Response, Compen-
    sation and liability Act (CERCLA) of 1980:
    EPA Region 5.
    See 1178
    Notification of Hazardous Waste Sites Re-
    quired Under Section I03(c) of the Compre-
   : hensive Environmental Response, Compen-
    sation and Liability Act (CERCLA) of 1980:
    EPA Region 6.
    Sea 1179
    Notification of Hazardous Waste Sites Re-
    quired Under Section 103(o) of the Compre-
    hensive Environmental Response, Compen-
    sation and Liability Act (CERCLA) of 1980:
    EPA Region 7.
   ...... Notification of  Hazardous Waste Sites  Re-
    quired Under Section l'03(c) of the cbmpre-
   ........ nerwive environmental Response, Compen-
    sation and Liability Act (CERCLA) of 1980:
    EPA Region 8.
                              ...........
   .......... Notification of  Hazardous Waste Sites  Re-
    quired Under Section 103(c) of the Compre-
   • hensivo Environmental Response, Compen-
    sation and Liability Act (CERCLA) of 1980:
    EPA Region 9.
    Soo1182
    Notification of  Hazardous Waste Sites  Re-
    quired Under Section 103(c) of the Compre-
    hensive Environmental Response, Compen-
    sation and liability Act (CERCLA) of 1980:
    EPA Region 10.
    See 1183
    OvervlQW  of Selected  EPA (Environmental
    Protection |  Agency) Regulations  and Guid-
   :i*nca  Affecting  POTW   (Publicly   Owned
    Treatment  Works) Management.
    Sao 0432
    SARA (Supertax)  Amendments and  Reau-
    tttorization  Act) Section 313 Roadmaps Data
    Bas«. User's Manual. Version 2.10.
    S«e 0304
    Twdcotogtcal Implementations of Remediat-
    ing Hazardous Wastes.
    See 1359
    Tracking Toxic Substances at Industrial  Fa-
    cilities;  Engineering  Mass  Balance  versus
    Materials Accounting.
    See 1362
    Updated Health Effects Assessment for Ace-
    tone. ..............................
    Sea 1080
TOXICITY
    ARAR's Q's and A's. Compliance with  the
    Toxiclty Characteristics Rule. Part 1.
    See 0396
    Compendium of ERT Toxiclty Testing Proce-
    dures,'
    See 0906
    Evaluation  of Exposure Markers.
    See 1246
    Quantifying Effects in  Ecological Site  As-
    sessments: Biological and Statistical Consid-
    erations.
    Sea 1063
    Acid Volatile Sulfide Predicts the Acute Tox-
    icity of Cadmium and Nickel in Sediments.
    See 1572
    Application  of a  Plant Test System in  the
    Identification of Potential Genetic Hazards at
    Chemical Waste Sites.
    See 1194
    Use  of  'Selenastrum  capricornutum'   to
    Assess the Toxicity Potential of Surface and
    Ground  Water Contamination  Caused   by
    Chromium Waste.
    See 1367
    Risk Assessment  Guidance for Superfund.
    Volume 1. Human Health Evaluation Manual
    (Part B).
    See 1067
    Risk Assessment  Guidance for Superfund.
    Volume 1. Human Health Evaluation Manual
    (Part C).
    See 1069
    Toxicity Bioassay and Eluate Heavy Metals
    Analysis Results of the Bench Scale Stabili-
    zation  Study  of  Soils  from  the  United
    Chrome  Superfund NPL (National  Priority
    List) Site Corvallis, Oregon.
    See 1546
    Toxicological  Assessment   of  Hazardous
    Wastes.
    See 1358
    Toxicological          Profile          for
    Benzo(b)Fluoranthene.
    See 1360
TOXICOLOGY
    Health Effects Assessment for Benzene.
    See 1035
    Health Effects Assessment for Cadmium.
    See 1036
    Health Effects Assessment  for  Carbon Tet-
    rachloride.
    See 1037
    Health Effects Assessment for Chlordane.
    See 1038
    Health Effects  Assessment  for Chloroben-
    zene.
    See 1039
    Health Effects Assessment for Chloroform.
    See 1040
    Health Effects Assessment for DDT.
    See 1041
    Health Effects Assessment  for  Methyl Ethyl
    Ketone.
    See 1042
    Health Effects  Assessment for Methylene
    Chloride.
    See 1043
    Health Effects Assessment for Naphthalene.
    See 1044
    Health Effects Assessment for Phenol.
    See 1045
    Health Effects Assessment for Styrene.
    See 1046
    Health Effects  Assessment  for Tetrachlor-
    oethylene.
    See 1047
    Health Effects Assessment for Trichloroethy-
    lene.
    See 1048
    Health Effects Assessment for Xylenes.
    See 1049
    Health Effects Assessment for 2,4,5-Trichlor-
    ophenoxy Acetic Acid (2,4,5-T).
    See 1050
    Risk Assessment Guidance  for Superfund.
    Volume 1. Human Health Evaluation Manual.
    Part A.
    See 1065
    Toxicological Implementations of Remediat-
    ing Hazardous Wastes.
    See 1359
    Toxicological Profile for Trichloroethylene.
    See 1361
    Updated Health Effects Assessment for Ace-
    tone.
    See 1080
    Use of IRIS Values in Superfund Risk  As-
    sessment.
    See 1081
TRACKING
    Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
    National PRP Listing Alphabetically by PRP
    Name.
    See 0616
    Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
    PRP Listing by Site for Region 1.
    See 0739
    Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
    PRP Listing by Site for Region 2.
    See 0744
    Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
    PRP Listing by Site for Region 4.
    See 0753
    Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
    PRP Listing by Site for Region 5.
    See 0758
    Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
    PRP Listing by Site for Region 6.
    See 0763
    Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
    PRP Listing by Site for Region 7.
    See 0768
    Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
    PRP Listing by Site for Region 8.
    See 0773
    Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
    PRP Listing by Site for Region 10.
    See 0783
TRAINING
    OSWER Source Book: Training and Tech-
    nology Transfer Resources.
    See 1283
    OSWER Source Book. Volume  1. Training
    and Technology Transfer Resources, 1992-
    1993.
    See 1284
    OSWER Source Book. Volume  2. Training
    and Technology Transfer Resources, 1992-
    1993.
    See 1285
    Required  Contracts  Management Training
    for Regional Superfund Personnel.
    See 0065
TRAINING DEVICES
    Superfund Progress: Fall/Winter 1992.
    See 0328
TREATABILITY VARIANCE
    Superfund  LDR Guide No. 6A (2nd Edition)
    Obtaining a Soil and Debris Treatability Vari-
    ance for Remedial Actions.
    See 0445
TREATMENT INNOVATION
    Tech Trends:  The  Applied Technologies
    Journal for Superfund Removals and Reme-
    dial Actions and RCRA Corrective Actions,
    December 1993.
    See 1332
TRENDS
    Tech Trends Number 3, December 1990.
    See 1325
    Tech Trends Number 4, March 1991.
    See 1326
    Tech Trends Number 5, May 1991.
    See 1327
    Tech Trends Number 9, June  1992.
    See 1329
    Tech Trends (Number 11).
    See 1331
SU-106

-------
                                                        SUBJECT INDEX
                                                                     USEPA REGION 8
TRIAL BURN
    Potential  Surrogate Metals for Incinerator
    Trial Burns.
    See 1486
TRICHLOROETHYLENE
    Health Effects Assessment for Trichloroethy-
    lene.
    See 1048
    Accutech Pneumatic  Fracturing  Extraction
    and Hot Gas Injection, Phase 1. Applications
    Analysis Report.
    See 1190
    Toxicological Profile for Trichloroethylene.
    See 1361
TRUST TERRITORIES
    National  Priorities List  Sites: The  United
    States Territories, 1992.
    See 0275
    Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
    PRP Listing  by Site for Trust Territories.
    See 0803
TRUST TERRITORY OF THE PACIFIC
ISLANDS
    Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
    PRP Listing  by Site for Trust Territories.
    See 0802
    Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
    PRP Listing  by Site for Trust Territories.
    See 0803
  '  Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
    PRP Listing  by Site for Trust Territories.
    See 0804
TTUSA PROCESS
    Toxic  Treatments  'In-situ'  Steam/Hot-Air
    Stripping Technology. Applications Analysis
    Report.
    See 1545
ULTRAVIOLET RADIATION
    Field  Demonstration  of the  UV/Oxidation
    Technology  to Treat Ground Water Contami-
    nated with VOCs.
    See 1452
    Technology   Evaluation  Report: SITE Pro-
    gram Demonstration of  the  Ultrox Interna-
    tional  Ultraviolet  Radiation/Oxidation  Tech-
    nology.
    See 1351
ULTROX SYSTEM
    Field  Demonstration  of the  UV/Oxidation
    Technology  to Treat Ground Water Contami-
    nated with VOCs.
    See 1452
ULTROX TECHNOLOGY
    Ultrox International Ultraviolet Radiation/Oxi-
    dation  Technology:  Applications  Analysis
    Report.
    See 1364
ULTROX TREATMENT
    Technology   Evaluation  Report: SITE Pro-
    gram Demonstration of  the  Ultrox Interna-
    tional  Ultraviolet  Radiation/Oxidation  Tech-
    nology.
    See 1351
UNITED STATES
    CERCLIS Characterization  Project: National
    Results.
    See 0001
    Evaluation of Ground-Water Extraction Rem-
    edies. Volume 2. Case Studies 1-19.
    See 1446
    NPL Characterization  Project: National Re-
    sults.
    See 0355
US EPA
    EPA/ORD     (Environmental     Protection
    Agency/Office of  Research  and  Develop-
    ment) Role and Perspective in Sediment Re-
    search.
    See 1585
    Ground-Water Issue: Soil sampling and anal-
    ysis for volatile organic compounds.
    See 1507
    Guidance on Site  Assessment Cooperative
    Agreements.
    See 0475
    Operations and Research at the U.S. EPA
    Incineration   Research   Facility:  Annual
    Report for FY89.
    See 1482
    Future of Expert Systems in the Environmen-
    tal Protection Agency.
    See 1257
    Risk Reduction Engineering Laboratory Site
    Remediation  Technical  Support  Program:
    FY92 Annual Report.
    See 1296
    Superfund  Program: Ten Years of Progress.
    See 0977
    Superfund Response Action Contracts.
    See 0074
    Using State and Local Officials to Assist in
    Community  Relations  {Superfund Manage-
    ment Review: Recommendation No. 43.K.L).
    See 0128
US EPA REGION
    NPL Characterization Project: Region 8 Re-
    sults.
    See 0362
US EPA REGION 1
    NPL Characterization Project: Region 1 Re-
    sults.
    See 0356
US EPA REGION 1-10
    NPL Characterization Project: National Re-
    sults.
    See 0355
US EPA REGION 10
    Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
    PRP Listing by Site for Region 10, January
    22, 1992.
    See 0785
US EPA REGION 2
    Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
    PRP Listing by Site for Region 2, January
    22, 1992.
    See 0746
US EPA REGION 3
    NPL Characterization Project: Region 3 Re-
    sults.
    See 0357
US EPA REGION 4
    NPL Characterization Project: Region 4 Re-
    sults.
    See 0358
US EPA REGION 5
    CERCLIS Characterization Project Region 5
    Results.
    See 0006
    NPL Characterization Project: Region 5 Re-
    sults.
    See 0359
    Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
    PRP Listing  by Site for Region 5, January
    22, 1992.
    See 0760
US EPA REGION 6
    CERCLIS Characterization Project: Region 6
    Results.
    See 0007
    NPL Characterization Project: Region 6 Re-
    sults.
    See 0360
    Site Enforcement Tracking System  (SETS):
    PRP  Listing by Site for Region 6,  January
    22, 1992.
    See 0765
US EPA REGION 7
    CERCLIS Characterization Project: Region 7
    Results.
    See 0008
    NPL Characterization Project: Region 7 Re-
    sults.
    See 0361
US EPA REGION 9
    NPL Characterization Project: Region 9 Re-
    sults.
    See 0363
    Site Enforcement Tracking System  (SETS):
    PRP  Listing by Site for Region 9,  January
    22,1992.
    See 0780
US EPA REGIONS
    Regional Quality Control Guidance for NPL
    Candidate Sites.
    See 0376
US EPA REGIONS 1-10
    Analysis of State Superfund Programs: 50-
    State Study, 1990 Update.
    See 0448
    Assessing  Reports of Continuous Releases
    of Hazardous Substances: A Guide  for EPA
    Regions.
    See 1142
    Data  Quality Objectives for Remedial  Re-
    sponse Activities: Development  Process. Ex-
    ample Scenario: Rl/FS Activities at a  Site
    with Contaminated Soils and Ground Water.
    See 0980
    Site Enforcement Tracking System  (SETS):
    Frequency by PRP Name Report, September
    26, 1991.
    See 0610
    Site Enforcement Tracking System  (SETS):
    National PRP Report by Site, September 26,
    1991.
    See 0619
US SUPERFUND
    Compendium  of  CERCLA  ARARs  fact
    sheets and directives.
    See 0417
USEPA REGION 1
    Site Enforcement Tracking System  (SETS):
    PRP  Listing by Site for Region 1,  January
    22, 1992.
    See 0741
USEPA REGION 3
    Site Enforcement Tracking System  (SETS):
    PRP  Listing by Site for Region 3,  January
    22, 1992.
    See 0750
USEPA REGION 7
    Site Enforcement Tracking System  (SETS):
    PRP  Listing by Site for Region 7,  January
    22, 1992.
    See 0770
USEPA REGION 8
    Site Enforcement Tracking System  (SETS):
    PRP  Listing by Site for Region 8,  January
    22, 1992.
    See 0775
                                                                                                                            SU-107

-------
 USEPA REGIONS 1-10
           SUBJECT INDEX
 UqEPA REGIONS 1-10,
   f Site Enfgrcamenf Tracjcjng System  (SETS):
    PRP National Listing Alphabetically by Party
    Nama, January 22,1992.
   	Sfl«p831	
   •;' ,$19 Enjofoarnorjt Tracjjing System  (SETS):
   I PRP National  Listing by  Site,  January  22,
    1992.
    Sea 0837
 USER MANUALS (COMPUTER PROGRAMS)  '
   jit^utoMtXJSE: ' An	  Improvement "  to   the
   • MOUSE Computerized Uncertainty Analysis
    System Operational Manual.
    Soa1201
   ICASHOUT User's Manual for Superfund.
    Sea 0515
    Continuous  Release-Emergency Response
    Notification System and Priority Assessment
    Modal: User's Manual for EPA Regions.
    Seta 1144
    Inorganic  Contract  Compliance Screening
    System Software for the  PC (SOW March
    1990 Version 1). User Manual.
    Sea 0041
   ' Organic  Contract Compliance Screening
   ! System. Software for the PC (OLM01.8 Ver-
    sion 1). User Manual.
    Sea 0057  '   . ™  „'!
   !'Organic  Contract Compliance Screening
   I System. Software for the PC (OLM01.8 Ver-
    sion 2) (Usor Manual).
    Sao 0058
    Organic  Contract Compliance Screening
    System. Software for the  PC (SOW March
    1990, Verston 1). User Manual.
    Sea 0059
    Ofgtnte  Contract Compliance Screening
   "System. Software for the  PC (Version June
    1990), User Manual.
    Soo0060
    PA-Soore  (Preliminary Assessment  Score)
    User's Manual and Tutorial. Version 2.1.
    Soo0367
    PA-Soora  Software,  Version  1.0.  Users
    Manual and Tutorial.
   	Se«b37i	
   	Removal Cost Management System:  Version
   L3.2.,,          	
    Soo 1009
 UTAH
    National Priorities List Sites: Utah.
    See 0276
    National Priorities List Sites: Utah.
    Soo 0277
    National Priorities List Sites: Utah, 1992.
    Soo 0278
    Site Enforcement Tracking System  (SETS):
    PRP Listing by Sfte for Utah.
    See 0805
    Site Enforcement Tracking System  (SETS):
    PRP Listing by Site for Utah.
    Sea 0806
    Site Enforcement Tracking System  (SETS):
    PRP Listing by Site for Utah.
    Sea 0807
VACUUM APPARATUS
    Torm Vac In situ Vacuum Extraction System:
    Applications Analysis Report,
   	Sea 1355
VENDORS   "    ,",'   .'".'.'!
    inventory  of Treatability   Study  Vendors.
    Volume 1.
    Sea 1171
VEfjMONT   ,  ,   	
    National Priorities List Sites: Vermont.
    See 0279
    National Priorities List Sites: Vermont.
    Soe0280
    National Priorities List Sites: Vermont, 1992.
    See 0281
    Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
    PRP Listing by Site for Vermont.
    See 0808
    Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
    PRP Listing by Site for Vermont.
    See 0809
    Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
    PRP Listing by Site for Vermont.
    See 0810
VIRGIN ISLANDS
    National Priorities List Sites: Puerto Rico and
    Virgin  Islands, 1992.
    See 0261
VIRGINIA
    National Priorities List Sites: Virginia.
    See 0282
    National Priorities List Sites: Virginia.
    See 0283
    National Priorities List Sites: Virginia, 1992.
    See 0284
    Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
    PRP Listing by Site for Virginia.
    See 0811
    Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
    PRP Listing by Site for Virginia.
    See 0812
    Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
    PRP Site Listing by Site for Virginia.
    See 0848
VITRIFICATION
    Babcock and Wilcox Cyclone Furnace Vitrifi-
    cation. Technology Demonstration Summary.
    See 1203
    Immobilization Technology Seminar: Speaker
    Slide Copies and Supporting Information.
    See 1555
    Innovative Technology: In-situ Vitrification.
    See 1514
    SITE  Emerging Technologies Project:  Bab-
    cock and Wilcox Cyclone Vitrification.
    See 1303
    Technology Evaluation Report: Babcock and
    Wilcox Cyclone Furnace Vitrification  Tech-
    nology. Volume 1.
    See 1337
    Technology Evaluation Report: Babcock and
    Wilcox Cyclone Furnace Vitrification  Tech-
    nology. Volume 2.
    See 1338
VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS
    Air/Superfund National Technical Guidance
    Study  Series. Air Stripper Design Manual.
    See 1374
    Air/Superfund National Technical Guidance
    Study  Series. Comparisons of Air Stripper
    Simulations and Field Performance Data.
    See 1376
    Air/Superfund National Technical Guidance
    Study  Series. Development of Example Pro-
    cedures for Evaluating the Air Impacts of
    Soil Excavation Associated with Superfund
    Remedial Actions.
    See 1380
    Air/Superfund National Technical Guidance
    Study  Series:  Estimation  of Air  Impacts for
    Soil Vapor Extraction (SVE) Systems.
    See 1383
    Air/Superfund National Technical Guidance
    Study  Series.  Models for  Estimating  Air
    Emission Rates from Superfund Remedial
    Actions.
    See 1388
    Evaluation of Portable Gas Chromatographs.
    See 1479
    Measurement  of  Volatile  Organic  Com-
    pounds during Start-Up of Bioremediation of
    French Limited Superfund Site  in  Crosby
    Texas  Using Wind  Dependent  Whole-Air
    Sampling.
    See 1414
    Canister-Based Method for Monitoring Toxic
    VOCs in Ambient Air.
    See 1396
    EPA Sjte Demonstration of the Terra Vac In
    situ Vacuum Extraction Process in  Grove-
    land, Massachusetts. (Site Program Update:
    Part VII).
    See 1243
    Field  Demonstration of  the UV/Oxidation
    Technology to Treat Ground Water Contami-
    nated with  VOCs.
    See 1452
    Long-Path  FTIR Measurements of Volatile
    Organic Compounds  in an Industrial  Setting
    (July 1989-April 1991).
    See 1413
    Remediation of Contaminated Soils by Sol-
    vent Flushing.
    See 1529
    U.S. EPA SITE Demonstration of AWD Tech-
    nologies' AquaDetox/SVE System.
    See 1363
    Sector Sampling for  VOC's during Remedi-
    ation of Superfund Site at Shaver's Farm,
    Georgia.
    See 1417
    Superfund  Guide:  Reportable Quantity Ad-
    justment for Methyl Isocyanate (MIC).
    See 1152
    Superfund   Innovative  Technology  Evalua-
    tion: The Delaware SITE Study,  1989.
    See 1322
    Technology  Evaluation Report: Perox-Pure
    (Trade Name) Chemical Oxidation Technolo-
    gy-
    See 1345
    Technology  Evaluation Report: SITE Pro-
    gram Demonstration  of the  Ultrox  Interna-
    tional  Ultraviolet Radiation/Oxidation  Tech-
    nology.
    See 1351
    Technology Evaluation Report: Site Program
    Demonstration  Test.  Accutech Pneumatic
    Fracturing  Extraction  and  Hot Gas Injection,
    Phase 1. Volume 1.
    See 1352
    Terra Vac In situ Vacuum  Extraction System:
    Applications Analysis Report.
    See 1355
WASHING
    Citizen's Guide to Soil Washing.
    See 0458
    Soil Washing Treatment.
    See 1532
WASHINGTON (STATE)
    National Priorities List Sites: Washington.
    See 0285
    National Priorities List Sites: Washington.
    See 0286
    National  Priorities  List Sites:  Washington,
    1992.
    See 0287
    Site Enforcement Tracking System  (SETS):
    PRP Listing by Site for Washington.
    See 0813
    Site Enforcement Tracking System  (SETS):
    PRP Listing by Site for Washington.
    See 0814
    Site Enforcement Tracking System  (SETS):
    PRP Listing by Site for Washington.
    See 0815
SU-108

-------
                                                        SUBJECT INDEX
                                                                 WASTE DISPOSAL
WASTE
    Technology Evaluation  Report:  SITE Pro-
    gram Demonstration of the Ultrox Interna-
    tional  Ultraviolet  Radiation/Oxidation  Tech-
    nology.
    See 1351
WASTE DISPOSAL
    Air/Superfund National Technical Guidance
    Series.  Superfund  Air  Pathway Analyses
    Review Criteria Checklists.
    See 1372
    Air/Superfund National Technical Guidance
    Study Series:  Compilation of Information  on
    Real-Time Air Monitoring for Use at Super-
    fund Sites.
    See 1377
    Air/Superfund National Technical Guidance
    Study Series. Database  of Emission  Rate
    Measurement Projects.
    See 1379
    Air/Superfund National Technical Guidance
    Study Series: Evaluation of Short-Term  Air
    Action Levels for Superfund Sites.
    See 1386
    Air/Superfund National Technical Guidance
    Study Series. Volume  1. Application  of  Air
    Pathway Analyses for Superfund Activities.
    See 1390
    Air/Superfund National Technical Guidance
    Study Series.  Volume 4. Guidance for Ambi-
    ent Air Monitoring at Superfund Sites (Re-
    vised).
    See 1393
    Air/Superfund National Technical Guidance
    Study Series. Volume 4. Procedures for Dis-
    persion Modeling and Air Monitoring for Su-
    perfund Air Pathway Analysis.
    See 1394
    Alternative Biological Treatment Processes
    for Remediation of Creosote-and PGP-Con-
    taminated  Materials: Bench-Scale Treatabil-
    ity Studies.
    See 1418
    American Combustion Pyretron  Destruction
    System. Applications Analysis Report.
    See 1193
    Analysis of State Superfund Programs: 50-
    State Study.
    See 0447
    ARCS (Alternative Remedial Contract Strate-
    gy) Contracts  Users' Manual.
    See 0019
    Assessment  of  International Technologies
    for   Superfund   Applications:   Technology
    Review and Trip Report Results.
    See 1197
    Assessment of Technologies for the Reme-
    diation of Radioactively  Contaminated Su-
    perfund Sites.
    See 1198
    Assessment  of  Tentatively Identified  Com-
    pounds in Superfund Samples.
    See 1199
    ATSDR    Health   Consultations   under
    CERCLA.
    See 1018
    Basic Concepts of Contaminant  Sorption at
    Hazardous  Waste  Sites  (Ground  Water
    Issue).
    See 1431
    Biological Assessment of Toxicity Caused by
    Chemical Constituents Eluted from Site Soils
    Collected at  the  Drake Chemical Superfund
    Site, Lock Haven, Clinton Co., Pennsylvania.
    See 1491
    CERCLA Off-Site Policy:  Providing Notice to
    Facilities.
    See 0415
    CERCLA Removal Actions at Methane Re-
    lease Sites.
    See 0416
CERCLA/Superfund Orientation Manual.
See 0130
CERCLIS  (Comprehensive   Environmental
Response, Compensation, and Liability Infor-
mation System) Site Location Extract.
See 0012
Commencement  Bay  Nearshore/Tideflats
Feasibility  Study. Development of Sediment
Cleanup Goals.
See 1578
Commencement  Bay  Nearshore/Tideflats
Feasibility Study. Executive Summary.
See 1579
Commencement  Bay  Nearshore/Tideflats
Feasibility Study. Volume 1.
See 1580
Commencement  Bay  Nearshore/Tideflats
Feasibility Study. Volume 2. Appendices.
See 1581
Compendium of ERT Groundwater Sampling
Procedures.
See 0903
Compendium of ERT Waste  Sampling Pro-
cedures.
See 0907
Compendium  of  NPL Listing Policies and
Procedures, 1982 to 1985.
See 0338
Conducting Non-Time-Critical Removal Ac-
tions under CERCLA.
See 0999
Conducting Remedial Investigations/Feasi-
bility Studies for CERCLA Municipal Landfill
Sites.
See 1084
Continuous Release - Emergency Response
Notification System. User's  Manual for In-
dustry.
See 1145
Cost of Remedial Action Model.
See 1085
Cost  of Remedial Actions (CORA) Model:
Overview and Applications.
See 1086
Criteria for Choosing Indicator  Species for
Ecological Risk Assessments at Superfund
Sites  (90-6402).
See 1224
Data  Quality  Objectives for  Remedial Re-^
sponse Activities: Development Process. Ex-"
ample Scenario:  RI/FS  Activities at  a Site
with Contaminated Soils and  Ground Water.
See 0980
Discharge  of  Wastewater  from  CERCLA
Sites  into POTWS.
See 0421
Enforcement  Project  Management  Hand-
book.
See 0531
Enforcement  Project  Management  Hand-
book.
See 0532
Enforcement  Project  Management  Hand-
book.
See 0533
Engineering  Bulletin:  Air Pathway  Analysis.
See 1404
Engineering Bulletin: Landfill Covers.
See 1233
Ensuring the Adequacy  of Cost Share  Provi-
sions in Superfund State Contracts.
See 0472
Evaluation of Terrestrial Indicators for Use in
Ecological   Assessments   at   Hazardous
Waste Sites.
See 1249
Expedited Response Actions.
See 1003
Forum Focus, August 1993.
See 0136
Framework for Real-Time Decision-Making:
New Bedford Harbor Pilot Dredging  Study.
See 1587
Further Direction on Implementing the Su-
perfund Accelerated Cleanup Model (SACM).
See 0093
Guidance on CERCLA Settlements with  De
Micromis Waste Contributors.
See 0547
Guidance on Implementation of the 'Contrib-
ute to Remedial Performance' Provision.
See 1093
Guide: Methods  for Evaluating the  Attain-
ment  of Cleanup Standards  for Soils and
Solid Media.
See 1508
Guide  to   Discharging  CERCLA  Aqueous
Wastes to Publicly Owned Treatment Works
(POTWs).
See 0423
Guide to  Obtaining No  Migration Variances
for CERCLA Remedial Actions.
See 0424
Handbook:  Responding  to  Discharges of
Sinking Hazardous Substances.
See 1589
Hydrogeology and Results of Aquifer Tests
in the Vicinity of a Hazardous-Waste Dispos-
al Site Near Byron, Illinois.
See 1463
Importance of Quality for Collection of Envi-
ronmental  Samples. Planning, Implementing,
and  Assessing Field Sampling  Quality at
CERCLA Sites. .
See 0919
In-situ  Stabilization/Solidification   of PCB
(Polychlorinated   BiphenylsJ-Contaminated
Soil.
See 1556
In situ Treatment of  Contaminated Ground
Water: An  Inventory of  Research  and Field
Demonstrations and Strategies for Improving
Ground Water Remediation Technologies.
See 1466
Incineration Data on Arsenic and Lead Emis-
sions.
See 1267
Innovative  Treatment Technologies:  Over-
view and Guide to Information Sources.
See 1272
Inside the  Hotline: A Compilation of 1992
Monthly Hotline Reports.
See 0141
Installation  Restoration  Program.  Technical
Support Document for Record of Decision,
Cape Newenham, AFS.
See 1276
Installation  Restoration  Program  Technical
Support Document for Record of Decision,
Tatalina Air Force Station LRRS Site.
See 1277
Interim Model  CERCLA  Section 122(g) (4)
De  Minimis  Waste  Contributor  Consent
Decree and Administrative Order  on Con-
sent.
See 0565
International Waste  Technologies/Geo-Con
In situ  Stabilization/Solidification: Applica-
tions Analysis Report.
See 1557
Limited-Use Chemical Protective Clothing for
EPA Superfund Activities.
See 1058
Methodologies   for   Implementation  of
CERCLA Section  122(g) (1) (A) De Minimis
Waste Contributor  Settlements  Proposals
and Agreements.
See 0572
                                                                                                                              SU-109

-------
WASTE DISPOSAL
       SUBJECT INDEX
   J,Jpb(|a  Incineration: Ar) Analysis of the  In-
    dustry,
    Soo 1480
    New Approach and Methodologies for Char-
    acterizing tha  Hydrogeologic Properties  of
    Sea 1470
    Notification  oJ Hazardous Waste Sites Re-
    quired Under Section 103(c) of the Compre-
    henslve Environmental  Response, Compen-
    sation and Uablty Act (CERCLA) of 1980:
    EPA Region 1.
    Sea 1174
   jJJotifjcattgn,  of Hazardous, Waste, Sites ..... Re-,
    'quired Under Section 103(c) of trie" Compre-
    hensive Environmental  Response, Compen-
    sation and Liability Act (CERCLA) of 1980:
    EPA Ragton 2.
    See 1175
    Notification  of Hazardous Waste Sites Re-
    quired Under Section 103{c) of the Compre-
    hensive Environmental  Response, Compen-
    sation and Liability Act (CERCLA) of 1980:
    EPA Region 3.
    Soo 1176
    Notification  of Hazardous Waste Sites Re-
    quired Under Section 103(c) of the Compre-
    honsivo Envifonmental  Response, Compen-
    sation and Liability Act (CERCLA) of 1980:
    EPARsgk>n4.
    Sea 1177
    Notification  of Hazardous Waste Sites Re-
    quired Under Section 103(c) of the Corripre-
    honsr.'o Environmental  Response, Compen-
    sation and Uability Act (CERCLA) of 1980:
    EPA Region 5.
    §981178
    Notification  of Hazardous Waste Sites Re-
    quired Under Section 1 03(c) of the Compre-
    hensive Environmental  Response, Compen-
    sation and Liability Act (CERCLA) of 1980:
    EPA Region 6.
    See 1179
    Notification  of Hazardous Waste Sites Re-
   ..... cprad Under "Section i03(c) of the Compre-
    rionsive Environmontal  Response, Compen-
    sation and Liability Act (CERCLA) of 1980:
   ..... EPA Region 7. ......
    See 1180 ..................................
    Notification  of Hazardous Waste Sites Re-
    quired Under Section 103(c) of the Compre-
    hensive Envifonmental  Response, Compen-
    sation and Uability Act (CERCLA) of 1980:
    EPA Rogton 8.
    Sea 1181
    Notification  of Hazardous Waste- Sites Re-
    quirod Under Section 103(c) of the Compre-
    hensive Environmental  Response, Compen-
    sation and Liability Act (CERCLA) of 1980:
    EPA Region 9.
    Sea 1182
    Notification  of Hazardous Waste Sites Re-
    quired Under Section 103(c) of the Compre-
    hensive Environmental  Response, Compen-
    sation and Liability Act (CERCLA) of 1980:
    EPA Region 10.
   .See ,1,183
    Operations and  Research at  the U.S. EPA
    Incineration  Research   Facility:   Annual
    Rupert for FY89.
    Seo 1482
    Operations  and  Research at  the U.S. EPA
    Incineration  Research   Facility:   Annual
    Report for FY90.
    Sea 1483
    Operations  and  Research at  the U.S. EPA
    Incineration  Research   Facility:   Annual
    Report for FY91.
    Sea 1484
    PA Review Checklist.
    See 0366
PA-Score  (Preliminary Assessment  Score),
Version  2.1, 3 1/2 Inch (for Microcomput-
ers).
See 0369
PA-Score  (Preliminary Assessment  Score),
Version  2.1, 5 1/4 inch (for Microcomput-
ers).
See 0370
Pilot-Scale  Incineration  of Comtaminated
Soils from  the Drake Chemical Super-fund
Site.
See 1522
Pilot-Scale  Incineration of PCB-Contaminat-
ed Sediments from the New Bedford Harbor
Hot Spot Superfund Site.
See 1292
Preliminary  Ranking   Evaluation   Score
(PREscore) Version  1.1  (for Microcomput-
ers).
See 0372
PREscore Software: Users Manual and Tuto-
rial Version 2.0.
See 0375
Procedural Guidance on Treatment of Insur-
ers  under CERCLA.
See 0589
Progress Toward  Implementing  Superfund.
Rscal Year 1988.
See 0299
Progress Toward  Implementing  Superfund.
Fiscal Year 1989.
See 0300
Quality  Assurance for Superfund Environ-
mental Data Collection Activities.
See 0991
Quantifying Effects in Ecological Site As-
sessments: Biological  and Statistical  Consid-
erations.
See 1063
Reductive  Dehalogenation  of Organic Con-
taminants   in  Soils  and  Ground  Water.
Ground Water Issue.
See 1527
Remedial Action, Treatment, and Disposal of
Hazardous  Waste.   Proceedings   of  the
Annual Hazardous Waste Research  Sympo-
sium (17th). Held in Cincinnati, Ohio  on April
9-11, 1991.
See 1135
Application of Tradescantia  Micronucleus
Assay for In situ Evaluation of Potential Ge-
netic Hazards from Exposure to Chemicals
at a Wood-Preserving  Site.
See 1195
Aseptic Sampling of Unconsolidated Heaving
Soils in Saturated Zones.
See 1489
Behavior of Arsenic in a  Rotary Kiln Inciner-
ator (Journal Version).
See 1204
Bench-Scale Evaluation  of  Alternative  Bio-
logical Treatment Processes for the Remedi-
ation  of Pentachlorophenol- and Creosote-
Contaminated Materials: Slurry-Phase Biore-
mediation.
See 1419
Comparison: Organic Emissions from Haz-
ardous Waste Incinerators versus the 1990
Toxics Release Inventory Air Releases.
See 1217
Control  of Transient  Incinerator  Emissions
with an  Oxygen Based Combustion  System.
See 1401
Control  Technology:  Estimating  Innovative
Technology Costs for  the SITE Program.
See 1222
EPA Site Demonstration of BioTrol Aqueous
Treatment System.
See 1441
Evaluation of Modifications to Extraction Pro-
cedures Used in Analysis of  Environmental
Samples from Superfund Sites.
See 1247
Evaluation of Waste Stabilized by the Solidi-
tech SITE Technology.
See 1554
Filtration  of Ground  Water  Samples  for
Metals Analysis.
See 1454
Pilot-Scale  Incinerability  Evaluation of  Ar-
senic-and  Lead-Contaminated  Soils from
Two Superfund Sites.
See 1288
Pilot-Scale Incineration of PCB-Contaminat-
ed Sediments from the Hot Spot of the New
Bedford Harbor Superfund Site.
See 1291
Quality Assurance for the SITE (Superfund
Innovative Technology Evaluation)  Program
Demonstrations.
See 0992
Remediation of  Contaminated Soils by Sol-
vent Flushing.
See 1529
SITE  Demonstration  of the American Com-
bustion Pyretron Oxygen-Enhanced Burner.
See 1299
SITE Demonstration of the CHEMFIX Solidi-
fication/Stabilization Process at the Portable
Equipment Salvage Company Site.
See 1559
Small Systems  Meet  Superfund Challenge
with Point-of-Entry Treatment Units.
See 1304
Respirometric Methods for Determination of
Biodegradability and Biodegradation Kinetics
for   Hazardous  Organic  Pollutant  Com-
pounds.
See 1427
Response Action Contractor Final  Indemnifi-
cation Guidelines.  Volume  2,  Number 1,
March 1993.
See 0067
Retech, Inc., Plasma Centrifugal  Furnace:
Applications Analysis Report.
See 1295
Revisions  to OMB Circular A-94 on Guide-
lines  and  Discount  Rates  for Benefit-Cost
Analysis.
See 1107
ROD Annual Report, FY 1989.
See 1111
ROD Annual Report, FY 1990.
See 1112
ROD Annual Report, FY1991. Volume 1.
See 1113
ROD Annual Report, FY1991.  Volume 2.
See 1114
Sector Sampling for VOC's during Remedi-
ation  of Superfund Site  at Shaver's Farm,
Georgia.
See 1417
Site Assessment: Evaluating Risks at Super-
fund Sites.
See 1076
Site  Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
Frequency by Party Name Report.
See 0607
Site  Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
Frequency by Party Name Report.
See 0608
Site  Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
Frequency by Party Name Report.
See 0609
Site  Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
Frequency by PRP Name Report, September
26, 1991.
See 0610
SU-110

-------
                                                     SUBJECT INDEX
                                                                  WASTE DISPOSAL
Site Enforcement  Tracking System  (SETS):
National Alphabetical Report by PRP Name,
September 26, 1991.
See 0612
Site Enforcement  Tracking System  (SETS):
National Frequency  by PRP  Name Report.
See 0614
Site Enforcement  Tracking System  (SETS):
National PRP Listing Alphabetically  by PRP
Name.
See 0615
Site Enforcement  Tracking System  (SETS):
National PRP Listing by Site.
See 0617
Site Enforcement  Tracking System  (SETS):
National PRP Listing by Site.
See 0618
Site Enforcement  Tracking System  (SETS):
National PRP Report by Site,  September 26,
1991.
See 0619
Site Enforcement  Tracking System (SETS)
(National - 3 1/2  Inch Diskette, IBM PS/2
Compatible) (for Microcomputers).
See 0620
Site Enforcement  Tracking System  (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Alabama.
See 0621
Site Enforcement  Tracking System  (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Alabama.
See 0622
Site Enforcement  Tracking System  (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Alabama.
See 0623
Site Enforcement  Tracking System  (SETS):
PRP  Listing by Site for  American  Samoa.
See 0624
Site Enforcement  Tracking System  (SETS):
PRP  Listing by Site for  American  Samoa.
See 0625
Site Enforcement  Tracking System  (SETS):
PRP  Listing by Site for  American  Samoa.
See 0626
Site Enforcement  Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Arizona.
See 0627
Site  Enforcement  Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Arizona.
See 0628
Site  Enforcement  Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Arizona.
See 0629
Site  Enforcement  Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Arkansas.
See 0630
Site  Enforcement  Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Arkansas.
See 0631
Site  Enforcement  Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Arkansas.
See 0632
Site  Enforcement  Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for California.
See 0633
Site  Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for California.
See 0634
Site  Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for California.
See 0635
Site  Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Colorado.
See 0636
Site  Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Colorado.
See 0637
Site  Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Colorado.
See 0638
Site  Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Connecticut.
See 0639
Site Enforcement  Tracking System  (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Connecticut.
See 0640
Site Enforcement  Tracking System  (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Connecticut.
See 0641
Site Enforcement  Tracking System  (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Delaware.
See 0642
Site Enforcement  Tracking System  (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Delaware.
See 0643
Site Enforcement  Tracking System  (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Delaware.
See 0644
Site Enforcement  Tracking System  (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Florida.
See 0645
Site Enforcement  Tracking System  (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Florida.
See 0646
Site Enforcement  Tracking System  (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Florida.
See 0647
Site Enforcement  Tracking System  (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Georgia.
See 0648
Site Enforcement  Tracking System  (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Georgia.
See 0649
Site Enforcement  Tracking System  (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Georgia.
See 0650
Site Enforcement  Tracking System  (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Idaho.
See 0651
Site Enforcement  Tracking System  (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Idaho.
See 0652
Site Enforcement  Tracking System  (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Idaho.
See 0653
Site Enforcement  Tracking System  (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Illinois.
See 0654
Site Enforcement  Tracking System  (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Illinois.
See 0655
Site Enforcement  Tracking System  (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Illinois.
See 0656
Site Enforcement  Tracking System  (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Indiana.
See 0657
Site Enforcement  Tracking System  (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Indiana.
See 0658
Site Enforcement  Tracking System  (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Indiana.
See 0659
Site Enforcement  Tracking System  (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Iowa.
See 0660
Site Enforcement Tracking System  (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Iowa.
See 0661
Site Enforcement Tracking System  (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Iowa.
See 0662
Site Enforcement Tracking System  (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Kansas.
See 0663
Site Enforcement Tracking System  (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Kansas.
See 0664
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Kansas.
See 0665
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Kentucky.
See 0666
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Kentucky.
See 0667
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Kentucky.
See 0668
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Louisiana.
See 0669
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Louisiana.
See 0670
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Louisiana.
See 0671
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Maine.
See 0672
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Maine.
See 0673
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Maine.
See 0674
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Maryland.
See 0675
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Maryland.
See 0676
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Maryland.
See 0677
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Massachusetts.
See 0678
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Massachusetts.
See 0679
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Massachusetts.
See 0680
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Michigan.
See 0681
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Michigan.
See 0682
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Michigan.
See 0683
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Minnesota.
See 0684
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Minnesota.
See 0685
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Minnesota.
See 0686
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Mississippi.
See 0687
Site Enforcement Tracking System  (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Mississippi.
See 0688
Site Enforcement Tracking System  (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Mississippi.
See 0689
Site Enforcement Tracking System  (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Missouri.
See 0690
Site Enforcement Tracking System  (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Missouri.
See 0691
Site Enforcement Tracking System  (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Missouri.
See 0692
                                                                                                                           SU-111

-------
WASTE DISPOSAL
       SUBJECT INDEX
   • Site  Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
    PRP Listing by Site for Montana.
    Sea 0693
   I Site  Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
    PRP Listing by Site for Montana.
    Saa 0694
    Sit*  Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
    PRP Listing by Site for Montana.
    Sea 0695
    Sita  Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
    PRP Listing by Site for Nebraska.
    Sea 0696
    Stte  Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
    PRP Usfing by Site for Nebraska.
    See 0697
    Stta  Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
    PRP Listing by Site for Nebraska.
    Sea 0698
    Sita  Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
    PRP Usting by Site for Nevada.
    See 0699
    Site  Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
   :, FHP Listing by Site for Nevada.
    See 0700
   : Site  Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
    PRP Listing by Sita for Nevada.
    Sea 0701
    Site  Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
    PHP U»ttng by Site for New Hampshire.
    See 0702
    Site  Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
    PRP Usting by Site for New Hampshire.
    See 0703
    Site  Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
    PRP Usting by Sita for New Hampshire.
    See 0704
    Site  Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
    PRP Listing by Site for New Jersey.
    See 0705
    Site  Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
    PRP Ltetlng by Site for New Jersey.
    See 0706
    Site  Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
    PRP Usting by Site for New Jersey.
    Sea 0707
    Site  Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
    PRP Usting by Site for New Mexico.
    Sea 0708
    Site  Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
    PRP Usting by Site for New Mexico.
    See 0709
    Site  Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
    PRP Usting by Site for New Mexico.
    Sea 0710
    Site  Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
    PRP Usting by Site for New York.
    See 0711
    Site  Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
    PRP Usting by Site for New York.
    See 0712
    Site  Entorcemanl Tracking System (SETS):
    PRP Usting fay Site for New York.
    See 0713
    Site  Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
    PRP Usting by Site for North Carolina.
    See 0714
   .SjJeEnfgrcemenJ Tracking System (SETS):
   LPRP Usting by Site for North Carolina.
    See 0715
    Site  Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
    PRP Usting by Site for North Carolina.
    See 0716
    Site  Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
   ; PRP Usting by Site for North Dakota.
    See 0717
    Site  Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
    PRP Usting by Site for North Dakota.
    Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
    £RP Usting by Site for North Dakota.
    See 0719
Site  Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Northern  Marianas.
See 0720
Site  Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Northern  Marianas.
See 0721
Site  Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Northern  Marianas.
See 0722
Site  Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Ohio.
See 0723
Site  Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Ohio.
See 0724
Site  Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Ohio.
See 0725
Site  Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Oklahoma.
See 0726
Site  Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Oklahoma.
See 0727
Site  Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Usting by Site for Oklahoma.
See 0728
Site  Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Oregon.
See 0729
Site  Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Oregon.
See 0730
Site  Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Oregon.
See 0731
Site  Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Pennsylvania.
See 0732
Site  Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Usting by Site for Pennsylvania.
See 0733
Site  Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Pennsylvania.
See 0734
Site  Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Puerto Rico.
See 0735
Site  Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Puerto Rico.
See 0736
Site  Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Puerto Rico.
See 0737
Site  Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 1.
See 0738
Site  Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 1, January
22, 1992.
See 0741
Site  Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 1. Volume 1.
See 0742
Site  Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 2.
See 0743
Site  Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 2, January
22, 1992.
See 0746
Site  Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 2. Volume 2.
See 0747
Site  Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 3.
See 0748
Site  Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 3, January
22, 1992.
See 0750
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 3. Volume 3.
See 0751
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 4.
See 0752
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing  by  Site for Region 4, January
22, 1992.
See 0755
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 4. Volume 4.
See 0756
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 5.
See 0757
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing  by  Site for Region 5, January
22, 1992.
See 0760
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 5. Volume 5.
See 0761
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 6.
See 0762
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing  by  Site for Region 6, January
22, 1992.
See 0765
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 6. Volume 6.
See 0766
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 7.
See 0767
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing  by  Site for Region 7, January
22, 1992.
See 0770
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 7. Volume 7.
See 0771
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 8.
See 0772
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing  by  Site for Region 8, January
22, 1992.
See 0775
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 8. Volume 8.
See 0776
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 9.
See 0777
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Usting by Site for Region 9.
See 0778
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing  by  Site for Region 9, January
22, 1992.
See 0780
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 9. Volume 9.
See 0781
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 10.
See 0782
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 10, January
22, 1992.
See 0785
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 10. Volume
10.
See 0786
SU-112

-------
                                                    SUBJECT INDEX
                                                                 WASTE DISPOSAL
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Rhode Island.
See 0787
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Rhode Island.
See 0788
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Rhode Island.
See 0789
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for South Carolina.
See 0790
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for South Carolina.
See 0791
Site Enforcement tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for South Carolina.
See 0792
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for South Dakota.
See 0793
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for South Dakota.
See 0794
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for South Dakota.
See 0795
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Tennessee.
See 0796
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Tennessee.
See 0797
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Tennessee.
See 0798
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Texas.
See 0799
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Texas.
See 0800
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Texas.
See 0801
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Trust Territories.
See 0802
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Trust Territories.
See 0803
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Trust Territories.
See 0804
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Utah.
See 0805
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Utah.
See 0806
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Utah.
See 0807
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Vermont.
See 0808
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Vermont.
See 0809
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Vermont.
See 0810
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Virginia.
See 0811
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Virginia.
See 0812
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Washington.
See 0813
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Washington.
See 0814
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Washington.
See 0815
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for West Virginia.
See 0816
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for West Virginia.
See 0817
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for West Virginia.
See 0818
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Wisconsin.
See 0819
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Wisconsin.
See 0820
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Wisconsin.
See 0821
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Wyoming.
See 0822
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Wyoming.
See 0823
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Wyoming.
See 0824
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP National Frequency  by  Party Name,
January 22, 1992.
See 0825
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP National Listing Alphabetically by Party
Name.
See 0826
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP National Listing Alphabetically by Party
Name.
See 0827
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP National Listing Alphabetically by Party
Name.
See 0828
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP National Listing Alphabetically by Party
Name.
See 0829
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP National Listing Alphabetically by Party
Name,  January 22, 1992.
See 0831
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP National Listing by Site.
See 0832
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP National Listing by Site.
See 0833
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP National Listing by Site.
See 0834
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP National Listing by Site.
See 0835
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP National Listing by  Site, January  22,
1992.
See 0837
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Report by Site for Region 1, September
26, 1991.
See 0838
Site  Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Report by Site for Region 2, September
26, 1991.
See 0839
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Report by Site for Region 3, September
26, 1991.
See 0840
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Report by Site for Region 4, September
26, 1991.
See 0841
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Report by Site for Region 5, September
26, 1991.
See 0842
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Report by Site for Region 6, September
26, 1991.
See 0843
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Report by Site for Region 7, September
26, 1991.
See 0844
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Report by Site for Region 9, September
26, 1991.
See 0846
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Report by Site for Region  10, Septem-
ber 26, 1991.
See 0847
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Site Listing by  Site for Virginia.
See 0848
Site Enforcement  Tracking System (SETS)
(Region 1  - 3  1/2  Inch Diskette IBM  PS/2
Compatible) (for Microcomputers).
See 0849
Site Enforcement  Tracking System (SETS)
(Region 2-31/2  Inch Diskette IBM  PS/2
Compatible) (for Microcomputers).
See 0851
Site Enforcement  Tracking System (SETS)
(Region 3-31/2  inch Diskette IBM  PS/2
Compatible) (for Microcomputers).
See 0853
Site Enforcement  Tracking System (SETS)
(Region 4-31/2  Inch Diskette IBM  PS/2
Compatible) (for Microcomputers).
See 0855
Site Enforcement  Tracking System (SETS)
(Region 5-31/2  Inch Diskette IBM  PS/2
Compatible) (for Microcomputers).
See 0857
Site Enforcement  Tracking System (SETS)
(Region 6-3  1/2  Inch Diskette IBM  PS/2
Compatible) (for Microcomputers).
See 0859
Site Enforcement  Tracking System (SETS)
(Region 7-3  1/2  Inch Diskette IBM  PS/2
Compatible) (for Microcomputers).
See 0861
Site  Enforcement  Tracking System (SETS)
(Region 8-31/2  Inch Diskette IBM  PS/2
Compatible) (for Microcomputers).
See 0863
Site  Enforcement  Tracking System (SETS)
(Region 9-31/2 Inch Diskette IBM  PS/2
Compatible) (for Microcomputers).
See 0865
Site  Enforcement  Tracking System (SETS)
(Region 10 - 3 1/2 Inch Diskette IBM  PS/2
Compatible) (for Microcomputers).
See 0867
Some Major Factors  Important  in Establish-
ing Land Use  Policy for Remediated Super-
fund Sites.
See 0308
Standard Document for Remedial Site As-
sessment Decisions.
See 0392
                                                                                                                         SU-113

-------
 WASTE DISPOSALS
       SUBJECT INDEX
     Streamlined Approach for Settlements with
     D«  Minimis  Waste  Contributors   under
     CERCLA Section 122(g)(1)(A).
  ;,  Sea 0870	
  =  Structure and Components of Five-Year Re-
     S«e 1120
     Structure and Components of Five-Year Re-
     Views.
     See 1121
     Suporfund   Accelerated   Cleanup   Model
     (SACM): Questions and Answers.
     Sea 0121
     Suporiund[Administrative Improvements. Ex-
     acutiva Summary.
     See 0310
   .! Suportond   Administrative   Improvements.
   ,:.pn>|Report
     Sea 0311
     Superfund and Small Waste Contributors.
     Sea 0881
     Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Clean-
     up Efforts.Nationwide.  Fall 1992.  (Lans-
     downa Radioactive Residence Site  Profile).
     See 0946
     Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Clean-
     up Efforts Nationwide, Fall 1993 (Bunker Hill
     Sits Profile, Silver Valley,  Northern Idaho).
     See 0951
     Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Clean-
     up Efforts Nationwide, Spring 1993  (French
     Umitod Site Profile, Harris County,  Texas).
     Sea 0954
     Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Clean-
     up Efforts Nationwide, Spring 1993 (Fulton
     Terminals Site Profile, Oswego County, NY).
     Sea 0955
     Suportund at Work: Hazardous Waste Clean-
     up Efforts Nationwide, Spring 1993  (Harvey
     and  Knott Drum Site, New Castle  County,
     Delaware),
     Sea  0956
     Suporfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Clean-
     up Efforts Nationwide, Spring 1993 (Old Mid-
     land Products  Site Profile,  Yell County, Ar-
     kansas).
     Sea 0957
     Suporiund at Work: Hazardous Waste Clean-
   ;up Efforts Nationwide,  Summer 1993 (Army
     Creek Landfill Site Profile, New Castle, Dela-
    ware),     	:	:"  :	:	:	
     S000962
    Suporfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Clean-
    up Efforts Nationwide,  Summer 1993 (Chis-
     rnan Creek Site Profile, York County, Virgin-
    la).
    See 0963
    Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Clean-
    up  Efforts   Nationwide,   Summer  1993
    (Common  Steps in the Removal  Process).
    See 0965	
    Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Clean-
    up Efforts Nationwide, Summer  1993 (East-
    ern Diversified  Metals Site Profile, Schuylkill
    County, Pennsylvania).
    Sea 0966
    Suporfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Clean-
    up Efforts Nationwide, Summer  1993 (Fike/
    Artet Chemical Site Profile, Nitro, West Vir-
    oMa).
    Sea 0967
    Suporiund at Work: Hazardous Waste Clean-
    up Efforts Nationwide, Summer 1993 (North-
    side Landfill Site Profile, Spokane. Washing-
    ton).
    See 0968
    Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Clean-
    up Efforts Nationwide, Summer 1993  (Rogue
    Vatiey/Dttch  Creek  Ranch  Site   Profile,
    Wimar, Oregon).
    S09 0969
 Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Clean-
 up Efforts  Nationwide,  Winter 1994  (Bailey
 Waste Disposal Site Profile, Texas).
 See 0973
 Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Clean-
 up Efforts Nationwide, Winter 1994 (Sey-
 mour Recycling Site Profile,  Seymour,  Indi-
 ana).
 See 0975
 Superfund Emergency Response Actions: A
 Summary of  Federally-Funded  Removals.
 Volume 1.
 See 0316
 Superfund Emergency Response Actions: A
 Summary of  Federally-Funded  Removals.
 Volume 2.
 See 0317
 Superfund Emergency Response Actions: A
 Summary of Federally Funded  Removals.
 Volume 3.
 See 0318
 Superfund Engineering Issue: Issues  Affect-
 ing the Applicability and Success of Remedi-
 al/Removal Incineration Projects.
 See 1308
 Superfund Fact Sheet: An Overview.
 See 0487
 Superfund  Fact Sheet: Community  Inter-
 views.
 See 0490
 Superfund Fact Sheet: Identifying Sites.
 See 0491
 Superfund Fact Sheet: Public Involvement.
 See 0493
 Superfund Fact Sheet: The  Remedial  Pro-
 gram.
 See 0494
 Superfund Fact Sheet: The  Removal  Pro-
 gram.
 See 0495
 SUPERFUND:  Focusing  on  the Nation at
 Large. A Decade of Progress at  National
 Priorities List Sites.
 See 0321
 Superfund  Innovative Technology Evalua-
 tion: The Delaware SITE Study, 1989.
 See 1322
 Superfund Progress - Aficionado's Version
 (Progress as of March 31, 1992).
 See 0326
 Superfund Remedial  Action  Decision Proc-
 ess: Database for Selected FY87 Records of
 Decision.
 See 1136
 Technology Evaluation Report: International
 Waste Technologies/Geo-Con In situ Stabili-
 zation/Solidification.   Volume 3.  Update
 Report.
 See 1567
 Technology  Evaluation  Report of  Retech,
 Inc., Plasma Centrifugal Furnace. Volume 1.
 See 1340
 Technology  Evaluation  Report: SITE  Pro-
 gram.  CF  Systems  Organics  Extraction
 System,  New   Bedford,  Massachusetts.
 Volume 1.
 See 1346
 Technology  Evaluation  Report: SITE  Pro-
 gram.  CF  Systems  Organics  Extraction
 System,  New   Bedford,  Massachusetts.
 Volume 2.
See 1347
Technology Selection Guide for Wood Treat-
 er Sites.
See 1122
Terra Vac In situ Vacuum Extraction System:
Applications Analysis Report.
See 1356
 Use of a Fourier Transform Spectrometer as
a Remote Sensor at Superfund Sites.
See 1365
WASTE DISPOSALS
    Technology Evaluation  Report  of  Retech,
    Inc., Plasma Centrifugal  Furnace. Volume 2.
    See 1341
WASTE MANAGEMENT
    Abstract Proceedings: Superfund Technical
    Support Project General Meeting.  Held in
    Athens, Georgia oh December 3-6,1990.
    See 1187
    Accelerating  Potentially  Responsible  Party
    Remedial Design Starts: Implementing  the
    30-Day Study.
    See 0509
    Accessing Federal Data  Bases for Contami-
    nated  Site  Clean-Up Technologies (Third
    Edition).
    See 1185
    Accessing Federal Data  Bases for Contami-
    nated  Site Clean-Up Technologies (Second
    Edition).
    See 1189
    Administrative  Order on  Consent for Reme-
    dial Investigations/Feasibility Study.
    See 0510
    Administrative  Penalty Procedures.
    See 0511
    Advancing the Use of Treatment Technol-
    ogies for Superfund Remedies.
    See 1191
    Air Superfund  National Technical Guidance
    Study  Series.  Estimation of Air  Impacts for
    the Excavation of Contaminated Soil.
    See 1384
    Air/SUperfund  National Technical Guidance
    Study  Series. Guideline for Predictive Base-
    line Emissions  Estimation Procedures for Su-
    perfund Sites.
    See 1387
    Air Superfund  National Technical Guidance
    Study Series. Screening Procedures for Esti-
    mating the Air  Impacts of Incineration at Su-
    perfund Sites.
    See 1389
    Amendment to Historical Definitions of NPL
    Deletion Start and Completion Dates.
    See 0335
    Analysis of State Superfund  Programs: 50-
    State Study, 1990 Update.
    See 0448
    Analysis of State Superfund  Programs: 50-
    State Study. 1991  Update.
    See 0449
    Annual  RREL  Research  Symposium (20th)
    Abstract Proceedings. Held  in   Cincinnati,
    Ohio on March 15-17, 1994.
    See 1184
    Applicability of  Land Disposal  Restrictions to
    RCRA and CERCLA Ground Water Treat-
    ment  Reinjection Superfund  Management
    Review: Recommendation No. 26.
    See 1430
    Approval of Long Term Contracting Strategy
    for  Superfund  (Superfund   Management
    Review: Recommendation E.2).
    See 0018
    ARAR's Q's and  A's.  Compliance with the
    Toxicity Characteristics Rule. Part 1.
    See 0396
    ARARs Fact Sheet:  Compliance with  the
    Clean Air Act and Associated Air  Quality Re-
    quirements.
    See 0397
    ARARs Q's and A's.
    See 0398,
    ARARS Q's  and A's: Compliance with  Fed-
    eral Water Quality Criteria.
    See 0399
•"•::,!:•     .              „        .. ;;
SU-114

-------
                                                    SUBJECT INDEX
                                                                                                         WASTE MANAGEMENT
 ARARs Q's and A's: General Policy, RCRA,
 CWA,  SDWA, Post-ROD Information, and
 Contingent Waivers.
 See 0401
 ARARs Q's and  A's:  State  Ground-Water
 Antidegradation Issues.
 See 0402
 ARARs Q's and  A's:  The Fund-Balancing
 Waiver.
 See 0403
 Arbitration Procedures  for Smalt Superfund
 Cost Recovery Claims.
 See 0512
 ARCS   Construction Contract Modification
 Procedures.
 See 0020
 ARCS Work Assignment Management: Field
 Guide.
 See 0021
 Assessing Sites under  SACM: Interim Guid-
 ance.  Volume 1, Number  4,  Deccember
 1992.
 See 0084
 Assurance  of  Hazardous Waste  Capacity,
 Guidance  to  State Officials.  Assistance  in
 Fulfilling the  Requirements  of  CERCLA
 104(c)(9).
 See 0129
 Audit  Management  Process.   Reference
 Guide.
 See 0085
 Audits and the Superfund Program Manager.
 See 0086
 Authority to  Use  CERCLA to Provide En-
 forcement Funding Assistance to States.
 See 0450
 AWD Technologies  Integrated  AquaDetox
 (Trade  Name)/SVE Technology: Applications
 Analysis Report.
 See 1202
 Bioremediation: An Information  Update on
 Applying Bioremediation to Site Cleanup.
 See 1421
 Bioremediation in  the Field. An  Information
 Update  on Applying  Bioremediation to Site
 Clean-Up. Number 3.
 See 1422
 Bioremediation in  the Field: An  Information
 Update  on Applying  Bioremediation to Site
 Cleanup. (Number 4).
 See 1423
 Bioremediation in the Field: Number 1, No-
 vember 1990.
 See 1424
 BioTrol  Soil Washing System  for Treatment
 of  a Wood  Preserving  Site:  Applications
 Analysis Report.
 See 1492
 CERCLA Community Relations Mailing Lists.
 See 0451
 CERCLA Compliance with Other Environ-
 mental  Statutes.
 See 0404
 CERCLA  Compliance  with  Other  Laws
 Manual: CERCLA Compliance with the CWA
 and SDWA.
 See 0406
 CERCLA  Compliance  with  Other  Laws
 Manual: Guide to Manual.
 See 0407
 CERCLA  Compliance  with  Other  Laws
 Manual: Overview of ARARs -  Focus  on
ARAR Waivers.
 See 0408
CERCLA  Compliance  with  Other  Laws
 Manual. Part 1. Interim Final.
See 0409
CERCLA  Compliance  with  Other  Laws
 Manual: RCRA ARARS-Focus on Closure
 Requirements.
See 0410
 CERCLA Compliance with the RCRA Toxici-
 ty Characteristics (TC) Rule: Part 2.
 See 0412
 CERCLA Enforcement Policy Compendium
 Update.
 See 0516
 CERCLA Implementation of Inspector Train-
 ing Requirements for OSCs/RPMs at the In-
 termediate Level in STEP and First-Line Su-
 pervisors.
 See 0517
 CERCLA Implementation of the Training Re-
 quirements of EPA Order 3500.1. Inspector
 Training.
 See 0518
 CERCLA  Notifications:   Emergency   Re-
 sponse  Notification System  (ERNS)  Fact
 Sheet.
 See 0926
 CERCLA  Site   Discharges  to   POTWS
 CERCLA Site Sampling  Program:  Detailed
 Data Report.
 See 1575
 CERCLA Site Discharges to POTWS  Treat-
 ability Manual.
 See 1577
 CERCLA Waste  Capacity Assurance.
 See 0131
 CERCLIS Listing.
 See 0014
 Characterizing soils for hazardous waste site
 assessments.
 See 1495
 Chemical Dehalogenation Treatability Stud-
 ies under CERCLA: An Overview.
 See 1209
 Citizen's Guide to Air Sparging.
 See 0452
 Citizen's Guide to Bioventing.
 See 0453
 Citizen's Guide to In situ  Soil Flushing.
 See 0456
 Citizen's Guide  to Innovative   Treatment
 Technologies   for  Contaminated   Soils,
 Sludges, Sediments and Debris.
 See 0457
 Citizen's Guide to Using  Indigenous and Ex-
 ogenous Microorganisms in Bioremediation.
 See 0461
 Citizens' Guidance Manual for the Technical
 Assistance Grant Program.
 See 0462
 Citizens' Guidance Manual for the Technical
 Assistance Grant Program.
 See 0463
 Clarification of Delegation to Approve Con-
 sistency Exemptions at NPL Sites.
 See 0336
 Closing  the  NPL Book  under the  Original
 HRS.
 See 0337
 Community  Relations during Enforcement
Activities and Development of the Adminis-
trative Record.
 See 0466
Community Relations in Superfund: A Hand-
 book.
See 0467
Community Relations: Use  of Senior Envi-
 ronmental Employees in  Superfund (Super-
fund Management Review: Recommendation
43.K.L).
See 0088
Comparative  Analysis of  Remedies Selected
in the Superfund Program during FY 87, FY
88 and FY 89.
See 0519
Compendium  of  CERCLA  ARARs  fact
sheets and directives.
See 0417
Compendium of  ERT  Air Sampling Proce-
dures.
See 0901
Compendium of ERT Field Analytical Proce-
dures.
See 0902
Compendium of ROD Language for FY 1993
Focus Areas.
See 1083
Congressional  Limits for FY 92 Alternative
Remedial Contracting Strategy (ARCS) Pro-
gram Management Costs.
See 0022
Consent  Orders  and  the  Reimbursement
Provision Under Section 106(b) of  CERCLA.
See 0520
Consideration  of  RCRA Requirements  in
Performing  CERCLA Responses at Mining
Waste Sites.
See 0420
Considerations in Ground  Water Remedi-
ation at Superfund Sites.
See 1436
Consultation  on   Records  of  Decision
(RODS) for Containment-Only Remedies.
See 0521
Contingency Analysis  Modeling for  Super-
fund Sites and Other Sources.
See 1219
Continuous  Release-Emergency  Response
Notification System  and Priority Assessment
Model: Model Documentation.
See 1143
Continuous  Release-Emergency  Response
Notification System  and Priority Assessment
Model: User's Manual for EPA Regions.
See 1144
Control of Air Emissions from Materials Han-
dling during Remediation. Engineering Bulle-
tin.
See 1398
Control of  Air Emissions from Superfund Air
Strippers  at Superfund Groundwater  Sites.
See 1399
Control Technologies for Defunct lead Bat-
tery Recycling  Sites: Overview and Recent
Developments. Volume  3.
See 1220
Coordination of EPA and State Actions  in
Cost Recovery.
See 0522
Cost Recovery  Actions/Statute of  Limita-
tions.
See 0523
Cost Recovery Actions under CERCLA.
See 0524
Cost Recovery Referrals.
See 0525
Counting State-Lead Enforcement NPL Sites
Toward the CERCLA Section 116(e)  Reme-
dial Action Start Mandate.
See 0468
Criminal  Investigations  and the Superfund
Program.
See 0469
Discussions with the Public Concerning NPL
Listings.
See 0339
Early Action and Long-Term  Action under
SACM: Interim Guidance, Volume 1, Number
2, December 1992.
See 0089
ECO Update. Volume  1,  Number 3.  The
Role of  Natural Resource Trustees  in the
Superfund Process.
See 1021
                                                                                                                       SU-115

-------
WASTE MANAGEMENT
       SUBJECT INDEX
  ;;;;,ECO,,, Update, Vojume 1, Number 4. Develop-
    ing  a  Work  Scope for Ecological  Assess-
    ments.
    SM1022
    Emergency Response Notification System.
    Sea 0927
  	 Endangermont Assessment Guidance.
    Soa 0527
    Endangorment Assessment Guidance.
    Sea 0528
  	' Endangerment Assessment Handbook.
    See OS29
    Endanoerment Assessment Handbook.
    Seo0530
    Enforcement under  SACM:  Interim  Guid-
    ance. Volume 1, Number 3, December 1992.
    Soo0090
    Enhancing  State  Superfund   Capabilities:
    Nine-State Study.
    Ssa 0471
    Entry and Continued Access under CERCLA.
    Sea 0534
  : Envtronmental Characteristics of EPA, NRC,
    and DOE Sites Contaminated with Radioac-
    livo Substances.
    Sea 1237
    Environmental Compliance Branch, Standard
    Operating Procedures and Quality Assurance
    Manual, Revision 1.
    See 0535
    EPA Interim Guidance  on  Indemnification of
    Superfund  Response  Action  Contractors
    Under Section 119 of SARA.
    Saa 0536
    EPA Oversight of Remedial Designs and Re-
    medial Actions Performed by PRPs.
  -;§f« 11,24	
  :: i E'PA/O.S. Army Corps" of Engineers Payment
  i Process,  Direct  Cite/Revised  Reimbursa-
  ',, mont Methods.
    See 1125	
  	i EPA/USACE Payment  Process: Direct Cite/
    Revised Reimbursement Methods.
  ::Seail26	
    Establishing  Work  Zones at Uncontrolled
  	" "Hazardous Waste Sites.
    Sea 0908
  : Evaluation and Testing of a Protocol to De-
    tormino tho Aerobic Degradation Potential of
  	Hazardous Waste Constituents in Soil.
  -	See 1503	
    Evaluation of, and Additional Guidance on,
    Issuance  of Unilateral Administrative Orders
    (UAOs) for RD/RA.
    Sea 0538
    Evaluation  of  Soil   Venting  Application.
    Ground Water Issue.
    See 1505
    Exemptions from the Statutory Limits on Re-
    moval Actions.
  ,. .Sea 1002	
  i Exercising Flexibility through the Superfund
  - Accelerated Cleanup Model (SACM).
  «. Sea 0091
  •" Expanded Civil Judicial	Referral Procedures.
  "S«9'b5"39
  i! Expansion of Direct Referral of Cases to the
  ::: Department of Justice.
    Sea 0540
  :- Expediting Remedial Construction.
    Sea 1127
    Extending the  tracking of Analytical Serv-
    ices to Potentially Responsible Party-Lead
  i Superfund Sites (Supplemental Guidance on
    OSWER Directive 9240.0-2A).
  !:;;; Se«p?86 	
  • Feasibility Study: Detailed Analysis of Reme-
  	 dial Action Alternatives.
  ""Saa, 1,088
  IK1' Faisftiliy" Study:	Development  arid Screen-
    ing of Remedial Action Alternatives.
    See 1089
Field Standard Operating Procedures for Air
Surveillance F.S.O.P. No. 8.
See 0910
Field Standard Operating Procedures for Es-
tablishing Work Zones (F.S.O.P. 6).
See 0911
Field  Standard Operating Procedures for
Preparation of a Site Safety Plan  F.S.O.P.
No. 9.
See 0912
Field Standard Operating Procedures for the
Decontamination of  Response  Personnel
F.S.O.P. No. 7.
See 0913
Final EPA Policy on the  Inclusion of Environ-
mental Auditing Provisions in Enforcement
Settlements.
See 0541
Final  Guidance on Administrative  Records
for Selecting CERCLA Response Actions.
See 0473
Final  Guidance on  Implementation of the
'Consistency'  Exemption  to  the  Statutory
Limits on Removal Actions.
See 1004
Rnal Guidance on Preparing  Waste-In Lists
and Volumetric Rankings for Release to Po-
tentially Responsible  Parties (PRPs) under
CERCLA ('Waste-In' Guidance).
See 0542
Final Policy on Setting RI/FS Priorities.
See 1090
First 125 De  Minimis Settlements: Statistics
from EPA's De Minimis Database.
See 0543
Funding of State Enforcement Related Ac-
tivities.
See 0474
Furthering the Use of Innovative Treatment
Technologies  in OSWER Programs.
See 1255
FY 1992 Themes for Regional Coordination
to Support Continuous Improvements of Su-
perfund's Remedial Program.
See 1091
Getting Ready: Scoping  the RI/FS.
See 1092
Guidance for  Capacity  Assurance Planning.
Capacity Planning Pursuant to CERCLA Sec-
tion 104(c)(9).
See 0137
Guidance for Coordinating ATSDR Health
Assessment  Activities  with  the Superfund
Remedial Process.
See 1029
Guidance for  Data Useability in Risk Assess-
ment.
See 1031
Guidance for  Data Useability in Risk Assess-
ment (Part A).
See 1033
Guidance for Environmental  Priorities  Initia-
tive (EPI) Facilities in the Superfund Pre-Re-
medial Program.
See 0341
Guidance for  Organizing  ARCS  Contract
Files.
See 0025
Guidance for Performing  Site Inspections
under CERCLA.
See 0343
Guidance of the Use of Stipulated  Penalties
in Hazardous  Waste Consent Decrees.
See 0544
Guidance on Applicability of  EPA  Order
3500.1 to CERCLA Staff.
See 0545
Guidance" on  CERClA  Section  106 Judicial
Actions.
See 0546
Guidance on CERCLA  106(a) Unilateral Ad-
ministrative Orders for Remedial  Designs
and Remedial Actions.
See 0548
Guidance on Documenting Decisions Not to
Take Cost Recovery Actions.
See 0549
Guidance  on  Drafting  Consent Decrees in
Hazardous Waste Cases.
See 0550
Guidance  on Expediting Remedial  Design
and Remedial Action.
See 1129
Guidance on Federal Superfund Liens.
See 0551
Guidance  on Implementation of the Super-
fund Accelerated  Cleanup  Model  (SACM)
under CERCLA and the NCP.
See 0094
Guidance on Landowner Liability under Sec-
tion 107(a)(1) of CERCLA,  De Minimis Set-
tlements   under Section  122(g)(1KB)  of
CERCLA, and Settlements  with Prospective
Purchasers of Contaminated Property.
See 0552
Guidance  on Oversight of  Potentially  Re-
sponsible Party  Remedial Investigations and
Feasibility  Studies. Volume 1.
See 1094
Guidance  on Oversight of  Potentially  Re-
sponsible Party  Remedial Investigations and
Feasibility  Studies. Volume  2. Appendices.
See 1095
Guidance on Premium Payments in CERCLA
Settlements.
See 0553
Guidance  on Preparing Waste-in  Lists and
Volumetric Rankings for Release to Poten-
tially  Responsible  Parties   (PRPs)  under
CERCLA.
See 0554
Guidance  on   Procedures  for  Submitting
CERCLA Section 106(b) Reimbursement Pe-
titions and on EPA Review of Those Peti-
tions.
See 0555
Guidance  on Program  Management Activi-
ties under ARCS.
See 0026
Guidance  on Site Assessment Cooperative
Agreements.
See 0475
Guidance  Regarding CERCLA Enforcement
against Bankrupt Parties.
See 0556
Guide  for Conducting  Treatability  Studies
under  CERCLA:   Aerobic   Biodegradation
Remedy Screening.
See 1156
Guide  for Conducting  Treatability  Studies
under  CERCLA:   Aerobic   Biodegradation
Remedy Screening. Interim Guidance.
See 1157
Guide  for Conducting  Treatability  Studies
under  CERCLA:   Aerobic   Biodegradation
Remedy  Screening. Quick  Reference Fact
Sheet.
See 1158
Guide  for Conducting  Treatability  Studies
under CERCLA: Biodegradation Remedy Se-
lection. Quick Reference Fact Sheet.
See 1160
Guide  for Conducting  Treatability  Studies
under CERCLA: Chemical Dehalogenation.
See 1161
Guide  for Conducting Treatability  Studies
under  CERCLA: Chemical  Dehalogenation.
Final Report.
See 1162
 SU-116

-------
                                                     SUBJECT INDEX
                                                                                                           WASTE MANAGEMENT
 Guide  for  Conducting  Treatability  Studies
 under CERCLA: Soil Vapor Extraction. Quick
 Reference Fact Sheet.
 See 1164
 Guide  for  Conducting  Treatability  Studies
 under CERCLA Solvent Extraction. Interim
 Guidance.
 See 1167
 Guide  for  Conducting  Treatability  Studies
 under CERCLA: Solvent  Extraction Quick
 Reference Fact Sheet.
 See 1168
 Guide  for  Conducting  Treatability  Studies
 under CERCLA: Thermal Desorption Quick
 Reference Fact Sheet.
 See 1169
 Guide  for  Conducting  Treatability  Studies
 under   CERCLA:  , Thermal   Desorption
 Remedy Selection. Interim Guidance.
 See 1170
 Guide on  Remedial Actions  at  Superfund
 Sites with PCB  Contamination.
 See 1262
 Guide to  Addressing Pre-ROD and Post-
 ROD Changes.
 See 1096
 Guide to Delisting  of RCRA Wastes for Su-
 perfund Remedial Responses.
 See 0422
 Guide to Developing Action Memorandums.
 See 1097
 Guide to Developing Superfund No Action,
 Interim Action,  and Contingency  Remedy
 RODS.                  .         ,
 See 1098
 Guide to Developing  Superfund  Proposed
 Plans.
 See 1099
 Guide to  Management of Investigation-De-
 rived Wastes.
 See 0345
 Guide to Pump and Treat Groundwater Re-
 mediation Technology.
 See 1462
 Guide to Removal Enforcement.
 See 1006
 Guide to Selecting  Superfund  Remedial Ac-
 tions.
 See 1100
 Harmonization of QA Procedures for Envi-
 ronmental Data Operations: Development of
 a  National  Consensus Standard for Quality
 Assurance for Environmental Programs.
 See 0989
 Hazard Ranking System Guidance  Manual.
 See 0346
 Hazardous  Waste Operations and Emergen-
 cy  Response:  Uncontrolled   Hazardous
 Waste Sites and RCRA  Corrective Actions.
 See 0425
 Hazardous Waste Operations and  Emergen-
 cy  Response:  RCRA TSD and Emergency
 Response Without Regard to Location.
 See 0914
 Headquarters Support Contract Management
 Procedures.
 See 0029
 HSED  SACM Report. Volume 1, Number 1,
 January 1993.
 See 0096
 Identification of  a Senior Superfund Official
for  Addressing  Special  NPL  Site-Related
 Issues.
 See 0348
 Implementation  of  the  Decentralized Con-
tractor Performance Evaluation and  Award
 Fee Process for Selected Remedial Program
Contracts.
See 0031
 Implementing the  Deputy  Administrator's
Risk Characterization Memorandum.
See 1056
 In situ Soil Flushing. Engineering Bulletin.
 See 1510
 Index to the Monthly Hotline Report Ques-
 tions (June 1982 to December 1991).
 See 0139
 Initiation of PRP-Financed Remedial Design
 in Advance of Consent Decree Entry (Final).
 See 0557
 Initiatives to  Streamline the Alternative Re-
 medial Contracting Strategy (ARCS)  Con-
 tracts' Award Fee Process.
 See 0033
 innovative  Methods to  Increase Public  In-
 volvement  in Superfund Community Rela-
 tions (Superfund Management  Review Rec-
 ommendation No. 43.A).
 See 0097
 Innovative  Technology:  BEST  Solvent Ex-
 traction Process.
 See 1270
 Innovative  Technology:  Glycolate  Dehalo-
 genation.
 See 1513
 Innovative Technology: In-situ Vitrification.
 See 1514
 Innovative  Technology: Slurry-Phase Biode-
 gradation.
 See 1271
 Innovative Technology: Soil Washing.
 See 1515
 Inorganic  Contract Compliance  Screening
 System (ICCSS) Software (ILM02.1  Version
 2) (for Microcomputers).
 See 0036
 Inorganic  Contract Compliance  Screening
 System (ICCSS) Software (ILM02.1  Version
 3) (for Microcomputers).
 See 0037
 Inorganic  Contract Compliance  Screening
 System (ICCSS)   Software  (SOW  March
 1990) (Version 1) (for Microcomputers).
 See 0040
 Inorganic  Contract Compliance  Screening
 System Software  for the PC (SOW March
 1990 Version 1). User Manual.
 See 0041
 Inside  the  Hotline: A  Compilation of 1991
 Monthly Hotline Reports.         "  •
 See 0140
 Inside  the  Hotline: A  Compilation of 1992
 Monthly Hotline Reports.
 See 0141
 Integrated Timeline for Superfund Site Man-
 agement (SMR 5,15).
 See 0098
 Interim Cashout Settlement Procedures.
 See 0558
 Interim CERCLA Settlement Policy.
 See 0559
 Interim Final Guidance Package on Funding
 CERCLA State Enforcement Actions at NPL
 Sites.
 See 0477
 Interim Guidance  for Soil Ingestion  Rates.
 See 1057
 Interim Guidance on Establishing Soil Lead
 Cleanup Levels at Superfund Sites. Supple-
 ment  to Interim Guidance on  Establishing
 Soil  Lead  Cleanup Levels  at Superfund
 Sites.
 See 1516
 Interim Guidance on Potentially  Responsible
 Party Participation in Remedial Investigations
and Feasibility Studies.
See Q561
 Interim Guidance  on Settlements with De
 Minimis Waste  Contributors  under Section
122(g)of SARA.
See 0562
Interim Guidance: Streamlining the CERCLA
Settlement Decision Process.
See 0563
  Interim Guidelines for Preparing Nonbinding
  Preliminary Allocations of Responsibility.
  See 0564
  Interim RCRA/CERCLA Guidance on Non-
  Contiguous Sites and On-Site  Management
  on Waste and Treatment Residue.
  See 0427
  International Symposium on Field Screening
  Methods for  Hazardous Wastes  and Toxic
  Chemicals (2nd), Proceedings.  Held in Las
  Vegas, Nevada on February 12-14, 1991.
  See 1279
  Issuance of Administrative  Orders for Imme-
  diate Removal Actions.
  See 0567
  Issuance  of  Administrative  Orders Under
  Section 3013 of  the Resource Conservation
  and Recovery Act.
  See 0568
  Issuance of Final Revised  Guidance on the
  Use and Issuance of Administrative Orders
  Under  Section 7003  of the Resource Con-
  servation and Recovery Act (RCRA).
  See 0569
  Land Disposal Restrictions as Relevant and
  Appropriate Requirements for CERCLA Con-
  taminated Soil and Debris.
  See 0428
  Liability of Corporate Shareholders and Suc-
  cessor Corporations  for Abandoned  Sites
  Under  the Comprehensive  Environmental
  Response,  Compensation and  Liability Act.
  See 0570
  Limiting Lead  Transfers to Private Parties
  during  Discrete  Phases of  the  Remedial
  Process.
  See 0571
  Long-Term Contracting  Strategy for Super-
  fund.
  See 0042
  Making Superfund Documents  Available to
  the Public throughout the Cleanup Process,
  and Discussing Site Findings and  Decisions
  as They are Developed  (Superfund Manage-
  ment Review:  No..43 G,  H, Q, R, T).
  See 0100
  Management     of    Investigation-Derived
  Wastes during Site Inspections.
  See 0349
  Measurement   of Volatile   Organic  Com-
  pounds during Start-Up of Bioremediation of
  French Limited Superfund Site in Crosby
 Texas  Using  Wind  Dependent  Whole-Air
. Sampling.
 See 1414
  Methodology for   Early  De  Minimis Waste
 Contributor Settlements under CERCLA Sec-
 tion 122(g) (1) (A).
 See 0573
 Minimizing Problems Caused by Staff Turn-
 over (Superfund Management Review: Rec-
 ommendation No. 43, M, N,  O).
 See 0105
 Mining  Sites on the National Priorities List:
 NPL Site  Summary Reports. Volume 1 (Alu-
 minum  Company of  America  (Vancouver
 Smelter) to Cleveland Mill).
 See 0350
 Mining Sites on the National Priorities List:
 NPL Site Summary  Reports.  Volume  2
 (Commencement  Bay Nearshore/Tideflats to
 Kerr McGee)  (Kress  Creek,  Reed-Keppler
 Park, Residential  Areas, Sewage Treatment
 Plant).
 See 0351
                                                                                                                         SU-117

-------
WASTE MANAGEMENT
      SUBJECT INDEX
    Mining Sites on the National Priorities List:
    NPt Sita Summary Reports. Volume 3 (Kerr-
    McGee Chemical Corp. (Soda Springs Plant)
    to Ormet Corp).
    See 0352
    Mining Sites on the National Priorities List:
    NPL  Site  Summary  Reports.  Volume  4
    (Oronogo-Duenweg  Mining  Belt  to Tar
    Creak).
    Sea 0353
    Mining Sites on the National Priorities List:
    NPL Site Summary Reports. Volume 5 (Tele-
    dyne Wan Chang to Wayne Interim Storage
    Fac«ty/W.R. Grace).
    See 0354
    Model Administrative Order on Consent for
    Removal Actions.
    Sea 0574
    Model Informational Notice Letter to Local
    Governments.
    See 0575
    Mode! Litigation Report for CERCLA Sec-
    lions 106 and  107 and RCRA Section 7003.
    See 0576
    Model Statement of Work for a Remedial
    Investigation and Feasibility Study Conduct-
    ed by Potentially Responsible Parties.
    Scs 0578
 ;:  Model Unilateral Administrative Order for Re-
    moval Response Activities.
 	Sea 0579	
    Model Unilateral Order for Remedial Design
    and Remedial Action.
    See 0580
    Multi-Media  Settlements  of  Enforcement
    Claims.
    Sea 0581
    Multi-Madia  Settlements  of  Enforcement
    Claims.
    Sea 0582
    Municipal Settlements.
    Sea 0583
    National  Superfund Program Priorities, Fiscal
    Year 1994.
    Soe 0298
    Notification of  Out-of-State Shipments of Su-
    pertund Site Wastes.
    Sea 0429
    Notification  Requirements  for  Continuous
 	 Releases of Hazardous Substances.
 ;r;.: See 1148
    OERR  Organizational  Conflict  of  Interest
    Revtow and Approval  Program (Superfund
    Management Review:  Recommendation No.
    46C),
    See 0046
    Off-Site Policy: RFA or Equivalent Investiga-
    tion Requirement at RCRA Treatment and
    Storage Facilities.
    Sea 0431
    Organic  Contract  Compliance  Screening
    System  (OCCSS) Software (OLM01.8 Ver-
    sion 2) (for Microcomputers).
    Sea 0049
    Organic  Contract  Compliance  Screening
    System  (OCCSS) Software (OLM01.8 Ver-
    sion 3) (for Microcomputers).
    See 0050
    Organic  Contract  Compliance  Screening
    System  (OCCSS) Software (OLM01.8 Ver-
    sion 6) (for Microcomputers).
    See 0053
    Organic  Contract  Compliance  Screening
    System (OCCSS) Software (SOW February
    1988) (for Microcomputers).
    See 0054
    Organic  Contract  Compliance  Screening
    System  (OCCSS) Software (SOW March
 •  1990) (Vorston 1) (for Microcomputers).
    See 0055
Organic  Contract  Compliance  Screening
System (OCCSS) Software  (SOW OLM01.8
Version  January  1992)  (Version  1)  (for
Microcomputers).
See 0056
Organic  Contract  Compliance  Screening
System. Software for the PC (OLM01.8 Ver-
sion 1). User Manual.
See 0057
Organic  Contract  Compliance  Screening
System. Software for the PC (OLM01.8 Ver-
sion 2) (User Manual).
See 0058
Organic  Contract  Compliance  Screening
System. Software  for the PC (SOW March
1990, Version 1). User Manual.
See 0059
Organic  Contract  Compliance  Screening
System. Software for the PC (Version June
1990). User Manual.
See 0060
OSWER Comparative Risk Project. Execu-
tive Summary and Overview.
See 1062
OSWER Integrated Health and Safety Stand-
ard Operating Practices.
See 0921
OSWER Source Book: Training  and Tech-
nology Transfer Resources.
See 1283
OSWER Source Book. Volume 1. Training
and Technology Transfer Resources, 1992-
1993.
See 1284
OSWER Source Book. Volume 2. Training
and Technology Transfer Resources, 1992-
1993.
See 1285
Overview of ERNS: Emergency Response
Notification System (ERNS) Fact Sheet.
See 0935
Overview of the Off-Site Policy for OSCs and
RPMs.
See 0433
Overview of  the  Outyear  Liability Model
(OLM).
See 0106
Overview of  the  Outyear  Liability Model
(OLM).
See 0107
PA-Score (Preliminary Assessment  Score)
User's Manual and Tutorial. Version 2.1.
See 0367
PA-Score (Preliminary Assessment Score),
Version 1.0  (for Microcomputers).
See 0368
PA-Score  Software,  Version   1.0.  Users
Manual and Tutorial.
See 0371
Performance of Risk Assessments in Reme-
dial   Investigation/Feasibility  Studies  (Rl/
FSs)  Conducted by  Potentially Responsible
Parties (PRPs).
See 1102
Performance  Tracking under  ARCS  Con-
tracts.
See 0061
Permits and Permit 'Equivalency' Processes
for CERCLA On-Site  Response Actions.
See 0435
Policy for   Enforcement  Actions against
Transporters under CERCLA.
See 0584
Policy for Superfund Compliance with the
RCRA Land Disposal Restrictions.
See 0436
Policy on Floodplains and Wetland Assess-
ments for CERCLA Actions.
See 0437
Policy on Management of Post-Removal Site
Control.
See 1008
Policy  on  Recovering  Indirect  Cost  in
CERCLA  Section  107 Cost Recovery Ac-
tions.
See 0585
Policy Towards Owners of Residential Prop-
erty-at Superfund Sites.
See 0586
Political  Subdivision  Involvement in  Super-
fund.
See 0479
Potential  for Joint Research between  EPA
and the U.S. Army.
See 1293
Preparation of  Hazardous Waste Referrals.
See 0588
PREscore Software. Users Manual and Tuto-
rial. Version 1.0.
See 0374
Priority for Health and Safety Requirements,
Especially  Medical  Surveillance  Require-
ments, for  EPA Employees Who  Support
OSWER Programs.
See 0923
Procedures  for  Documenting  Costs  for
CERCLA Section 107 Actions.
See 0590
Procedures for Transmittal of  CERCLA and
RCRA Civil Judicial Enforcement Case Pack-
ages to Headquarters.
See 0591
Progress  Toward  Implementing Superfund,
Fiscal Year 1990: A Report to the Congress.
See 0301
Progress  Toward  Implementing Superfund,
Fiscal Year 1991. Report to Congress.
See 0302
Proposed Method to Evaluate the Effective-
ness of Community Involvement in Super-
fund (Superfund Management Review:  Rec-
ommendation Number 43.A).
See 0109
PRP  Search Supplemental Guidance for
Sites  in the Superfund Remedial  Program.
See 0592
Public Awareness Signs at Superfund Sites.
See 0481
Quality and  Environmental Protection: The
EPA QA Program.
See 0990
Questions and  Answers  About the State
Role in  Remedy Selection at  Non-Fund-Fi-
nanced Enforcement Sites.
See 0482
Real  Estate  Acquisition  Procedures  for
USAGE Projects.
See 1133
Reassignment of CLP Transportation Func-
tions.
See 0063
Recent Advances in  Risk Reduction Engi-
neering.
See 1064
Regional  Guide: Issuing Site-Specific Treat-
ability Variances for Contaminated Soils and
Debris from   Land  Disposal   Restrictions
(LDRs).
See 1528
Regional  Oversight of Federal Facility Clean-
ups under CERCLA.
See 0900
Regional  Pilot Projects and Initiatives.
See 0064
Regional  Pilots and Applications of Super-
fund Accelerated Cleanup Model (SACM).
See 0110
Releasing Identities of Potentially Responsi-
ble Parties in Response to FOIA Requests.
See 0594
SU-118

-------
                                                      SUBJECT INDEX
                                                                                                            WASTE MANAGEMENT
 Releasing Information to Potentially Respon-
 sible Parties at CERCLA Sites.
 See 0595
 Remedial Action Report: Documentation for
 Operable Unit Completion.
 See 1134
 Remedial Investigation: Site Characterization
 and Treatability Studies.
 See 1106
 Removal Cost Management System: Version
 3.2.
 See 1009
 Report to Congress: Settlements with Munic-
 ipal  Waste  Generators  and  Transporters
 Since 1991 under the Comprehensive  Envi-
 ronmental Response, Compensation, and Li-
 ability Act of 1980.
 See 0596
 Reporting  and  Exchange of Information on
 State  Enforcement Actions at National Prior-
 ities List Sites.
 See 0483
 Reporting Requirements for Continuous Re-
 leases of  Hazardous  Substances: A Guide
 for Facilities and Vessels on Compliance.
 See 1150
 Asymmetric Loss Function for Superfund Re-
 mediation Decisions.
 See 1200
 Bench-Scale Evaluation of Alternative  Bio-
 logical Treatment Processes for the Remedi-
 ation  of Pentachlorophenol- and Creosote-
 Contaminated  Materials: Solid-Phase Biore-
 mediation.
 See 1420
 Control Technology:  1992  Update of  U.S.
 EPA's  Superfund  Innovative Technology
 Evaluation (SITE) Emerging Technology Pro-
 gram.
 See 1223
 Cost  Estimating  Systems  for   Remedial
 Action Projects.
 See 1123
 Incineration Treatment  of  Arsenic-Contami-
 nated Soil.
 See 1268
 Management Systems Review of the Super-
 fund RI/FS: Opportunities  for Streamlining.
 See 1101
 PAST: The Potential ARARs Selection Tool.
 See 0434
 Superfund Soils  Data Management System.
 See 1536
 U.S. EPA SITE Demonstration of AWD Tech-
 nologies' AquaDetox/SVE System.
 See 1363
 Revised EPA Guidance on Parallel  Proceed-
 ings.
 See 0597
 Revised  Hazard Ranking System:  An  Im-
 proved Tool for Screening  Superfund Sites.
 See 0377
 Revised  Hazard  Ranking   System:  Back-
 ground Information.
 See 0378
 Revised  Hazard  Ranking System:  Qs  and
As.
 See 0381
 Revised Hazardous Waste Bankruptcy Guid-
ance.
See 0598
 Revised Hazardous Waste Bankruptcy Guid-
ance, October 7, 1991.
See 0599
Revised Policy on Discretionary Information
Release under CERCLA.
See 0600
Revised Procedures for  Implementing  Off-
Site Response Actions.
See 0601
 Revision of  Policy  Regarding  Superfund
 Project Assignment between Alternative Re-
 medial Contracting Strategy Contractors and
 the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers.
 See 0068
 Revisions to the Interim Guidance on PRP
 Participation in Remedial Investigations and
 Feasibility Studies.
 See 0603
 RI/FS Streamlining.
 See 1110
 Risk Assessment Guidance for  Superfund.
 Volume  1. Human Health Evaluation Manual.
 Part A, April 1990.
 See 1066
 Risk Assessment in  Superfund: A  Primer.
 First Edition, September 1990.
 See 1073
 Role of  Community Interviews in the Devel-
 opment  of a Community Relations Program
 for Remedial Response.
 See 0485
 Role of  Expedited Response Actions under
 SARA.
 See 1116
 Roles and Responsibilities of Deputy Project
 Officers  and  Work  Assignment Managers
 under the  Technical  Enforcement  Support
 (TES) Contracts.
 See 0069
 Roles   and  Responsibilities  of  Regional
 Project Officers, Zone Project Officers, Work
 Assignment Managers and Contracting Offi-
 cers for  the RCRA Enforcement, Permitting
 and Assistance Contracts (REPA).
 See 0070
 Roles   and  Responsibilities  of  Regional
 Project   Officers  and  Headquarters  Zone
 Project  Officers for  Management of  TES
 (TES 5) Contracts.
 See 0604
 SACM  Regional  Decision Teams:  Interim
 Guidance. Volume 1, Number 5,  December
 1992.
 See 0111
 Sampler's Guide to the Contract Laboratory
 Program.
 See 0071
 Scope of the CERCLA Petroleum Exclusion
 under Sections 101(14) and 104(a)(2).
 See 0605
 Scoper's Notes:  An  RI/FS  Costing  Guide.
 Bringing  in  a  Quality RI/FS on  Time and
 Within Budget.
 See 1117
 Selection of  Control Technologies for Reme-
 diation of Lead Battery Recycling Sites. (En-
 gineering Bulletin).
 See 1298
 Site Classification Changes from Enforce-
 ment to Fund Lead.
 See 0606
 Site Enforcement Tracking System  (SETS)
 (National).
 See 0611
 Site Enforcement Tracking System  (SETS)
 (National) (for Microcomputers).
 See 0613
 Site Enforcement  Tracking System (SETS):
 PRP Listing by Site for Region 1.
 See 0740
 Site  Enforcement  Tracking System (SETS):
 PRP Listing by Site for Region 2.
See 0745
Site  Enforcement  Tracking System (SETS):
 PRP Listing by Site for Region 3.
See 0749
Site  Enforcement  Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 4.
See 0754
 Site Enforcement Tracking System  (SETS):
 PRP Listing by Site for Region 5.
 See 0759
 Site Enforcement Tracking System  (SETS):
 PRP Listing by Site for Region 6.
 See 0764
 Site Enforcement Tracking System  (SETS):
 PRP Listing by Site for Region 7.
 See 0769
 Site Enforcement Tracking System  (SETS):
 PRP Listing by Site for Region 8.
 See 0774
 Site Enforcement Tracking System  (SETS):
 PRP Listing by Site for Region 9.
 See 0779
 Site Enforcement Tracking System  (SETS):
 PRP Listing by Site for Region 10.
 See 0784
 Site Enforcement Tracking System  (SETS):
 PRP National Listing Alphabetically by Party
 Name.
 See 0830
 Site Enforcement Tracking System  (SETS):
 PRP National Listing by Site.
 See 0836
 Site Enforcement Tracking System  (SETS)
 (Region 1) (for Microcomputers).
 See 0850
 Site Enforcement Tracking System  (SETS)
 (Region 2) (for Microcomputers).
 See 0852
 Site Enforcement Tracking System  (SETS)
 (Region 3) (for Microcomputers).
 See 0854
 Site Enforcement Tracking System  (SETS)
 (Region 4) (for Microcomputers).
 See 0856
 Site Enforcement  Tracking System  (SETS)
 (Region 5) (for Microcomputers).
 See 0858
 Site Enforcement  Tracking System  (SETS)
 (Region 6) (for Microcomputers).
 See 0860
 Site Enforcement Tracking System  (SETS)
 (Region 7) (for Microcomputers).
 See 0862
 Site Enforcement Tracking System  (SETS)
 (Region 8) (for Microcomputers).
 See 0864
 Site Enforcement Tracking System  (SETS)
 (Region 9) (for Microcomputers).
 See 0866
 Site Enforcement Tracking System  (SETS)
 (Region 10) (for Microcomputers).
 See 0868
 Site-Specific Contracting for Removals.
 See 1011
 Small Cost Recovery Referrals.
 See 0869
 Smart Moves in Superfund - Regional Initia-
 tives. Volume 1, Number 1, February 1992.
 See 0305
 Smart Moves in Superfund - Regional Pilots
 and Initiatives. Volume 1,  Number 2, Sep-
 tember 1992.
 See 0306
 Smart Moves  in Superfund -  Revitalization
 One Year Later. Volume 1, Number 3, Janu-
 ary 1993.
 See 0307
 Soil Washing Treatment.
See 1532
Status of Key SACM Program  Management
 Issues: Interim Guidance, Volume 1, Number
 1, December 1992.
See 0113
Status of Regional Superfund Pilots: End-of-
Year Report.
See 0309
                                                                                                                         SU-119

-------
WASTE MANAGEMENT
  IS'SlreamHnJng the RI/FS for CERCLA Munlci-
  '	pal Land (ill Sites.
  '=;'§«« 1118      	
    Streamlining tha Rl/FS (or CERCLA Munici-
    pal Landfill Sites.
    S®8 1119
  ii  Submittal of Ten-Point Settlement Analyses
    (or CERCLA Consent Decrees.
  !:J"Sa9087i	;.   	
    Suggested  ROD  Language   for  Various
  :  Ground Water Remediation Options.
    Sea 1475
    Summary of 'Guidance of Landowner  Liabil-
    ity under Section  107(a)1  of  CERCLA, De
    MWmis    Settlements    under   Section
    122(gHD(b) ol CERCLA,  and  Settlements
    with Prospective Purchasers of  Contaminat-
  	«d Property'.
    Sea 0872
    Summary o( 'Guidance on CERCLA Section
    106(8) UAOs for RD/RA'.
  •	SW0873
    Summary of 'Guidance on Documenting be-
    dskxis Not to Take Cost Recovery Actions'.
    See 0874
    Summary of 'Interim Guidance:  Streamlining
    th« CERCLA Settlement Decision Process'.
    So« 0875
  : Summary of 'Interim Guidelines for Preparing
  	..NBAfls1,	
    S08 0876
    Summary of 'Interim Policy on CERCLA Set-
    tlements Involving Municipalities and Munici-
    pal Wastes'.
    S»9 0877
    Summary of 'Methodologies for Implementa-
    tion  of  CERCLA Section  122(g)(1)(a) De
    Minimis Waste Contributor Settlements'.
    Sea 0878
    Summary  of  'Nbtificalbn  of  Out-of-State
    Shipments of Superfund Site Wastes'.
    Sea 0438
  iii: Summary  of 'PRP  Search  Supplemental
    Guidance for Sites in the Superfund Remedi-
   " *l Program'.
  •	' Sea 0879
  !:;, Summary ot 'Releasing Information to  Poten-
  ;; ttalty Responsible Parties at CERCLA Sites'.
  f Sea 0880
  j.-i 'Superfund  Accelerated  Cleanup  Bulletin:
  i	Presumptlya R"emedies"fPr Municipal Landfill
  t'. .Sites. Volume 2," Number 1, February 1993.
  !,'; See 0115     ,;~	I'
    Suportund  Accelerated  Cleanup  Bulletin:
  ' Presumptive Remedies for Wood Treatment
  f Facllies. Volume; 1, 'Number 2, May 1992.
  i" See 0116  	
  •  Superfund  Accelerated  Cleanup  Bulletin.
  ,  Volume 1, Number 3. Presumptive  Reme-
  •  dies.
    S«00118
                Accelerated  Cleanup   Model
            Coordlriilon Strategy.
        0120"	
    Superfund   Accelerated  Cleanup   Model
    (SACM). Volume 1,  Number  4,  November
    1992.
    Sea 0122
    Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Clean-
    up Efforts Nationwide (Bog Creek Farm).
    Sea 0940
    Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Clean-
    up Efforts Nationwide (City Industries).
    Sea 0941
    Suporfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Clean-
    up Efforts Nationwide, Fall 1992. (American
    Thormostat Corporation, New York).
    Se«0942
    Suporfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Clean-
    up Efforts Nationwide, Fall 1992. (Celanese
    Corporation Site> Profile)^
    Sea 0943
      SUBJECT INDEX
Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Clean-
up Efforts Nationwide, Fall 1992. (Ciba-Geigy
Corporation, Mclntosh, Alabama).
See 0944
Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Clean-
up Efforts Nationwide, Fall 1992. (Krysowaty
Farm, Hillsborough, New Jersey).
See 0945
Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Clean-
up Efforts Nationwide, Fall  1992. (Valley of
the Drums, Bullitt County, Kentucky).
See 0947
Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Clean-
up  Efforts  Nationwide,  Fall  1992.  (Wide
Beach Section of Brant, New York).
See 0948
Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Clean-
up  Efforts  Nationwide, Fall  1993 (Big D
Campground Site Profile, Ashtabula County,
Kingsville, Ohio).
See 0949
Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Clean-
up  Efforts  Nationwide, Fall  1993  (Brown
Wood  Preserving  Site  Profile,  Suwanee
County, Florida).
See 0950
Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Clean-
up Efforts Nationwide (McKin Company).
See 0953
Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Clean-
up Efforts Nationwide, Spring 1993 (Triana/
Tennessee River Site, Alabama).
See 0960
Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Clean-
up Efforts Nationwide, Spring  1993 (United
Chrome Products Site Profile).
See 0961
Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Clean-
up Efforts Nationwide, Summer 1993  (Coal
Creek Site Profile, Chehalis, Washington).
See 0964
Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Clean-
up  Efforts  Nationwide, Summer 1993  (Tri-
State Plating Site  Profile, Columbus,  Indi-
ana).
See 0970
Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Clean-
up Efforts Nationwide (White Chemical).
See 0971
Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Clean-
up Efforts Nationwide, Winter 1993. (Wells G
and H Site, Woburn,  Massachusetts).
See 0972
Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Clean-
up Efforts  Nationwide, Winter 1994  (New
Brighton Site Profile,  Minneapolis/St.  Paul,
Minnesota).
See 0974
Superfund Cost Recovery Strategy.
See 0882
Superfurid  Desk Reference for Municipali-
ties.
See 0486
Superfund  Docket  Operations Manual for
 Rulemaking Activities.
See 0081
Superfund Emergency Response Actions: A
Summary of  Federally-Funded Removals.
 Fifth Annual Report - Fiscal Year 1990.
See 0313
 Superfund Emergency Response Actions: A
Summary of Federally  Funded Removals.
 Fourth Annual  Report - Fiscal Year  1989.
 See 0314
 Superfund Emergency Response Actions: A
 Summary of  Federally-Funded Removals.
 Sixth Annual Report, Fiscal Year 1991.
 See 0315
 Superfund Emergency Response Actions: A
 Summary of Federally  Funded Removals.
 Volume 3.
 See 0318
Superfund Enforcement Strategy and
mentation Plan.
See 0883
Superfund Engineering Issue: Considerations
for Evaluating the Impact of Metals Partition-
ing during the Incineration of Contaminated
Soils from Superfund Sites.
See 1534
Superfund: EPA/ICMA Superfund Revitaliza-
tion Conference. Held in Chicago, Illinois on
November 12-13, 1992.
See 0319
Superfund: EPA/ICMA Superfund Revitaliza-
tion  Conference.  Held  in  San  Francisco,
California on February 1-2, 1993.
See 0320
Superfund Information Repositories  and Ad-
ministrative Records.
See 0884
Superfund Innovative Technology Evaluation
Program:  Progress  and  Accomplishments,
Fiscal 'Year  1989. A Third Report  to  Con-
gress.
See 1311
Superfund Innovative Technology Evaluation
Program: Technology Profiles,  Fourth Edi-
tion.
See 1316
Superfund Innovative Technology Evaluation
Program:  Technology Profiles,  November
1989.
See 1317
Superfund LDR Guide No.  1: Overview of
RCRA Land Disposal Restrictions (LDRs).
See 0440
Superfund LDR Guide No. 2: Complying with
the California List Restrictions  under  Land
Disposal Restrictions (LDRs).
See 0441
Superfund  LDR  Guide  No. 3: Treatment
Standards  and  Minimum  Technology  Re-
quirements under Land Disposal Restrictions
(LDRS).
See 0442
Superfund LDR Guide No. 4: Complying with
the Hammer Restrictions under Land Dis-
posal Restrictions (LDRs).
See 0443
Superfund  LDR Guide  No. 5:  Determining
When Land Disposal Restrictions (LDRs) Are
'Applicable'  to CERCLA  Response Actions.
See 0444
Superfund LDR Guide No. 6A (2nd Edition)
Obtaining a Soil and Debris Treatability Vari-
ance for Remedial Actions.
See 0445
Superfund  LDR  Guide  No. 7.  Determining
When Land Disposal Restrictions (LDRs) Are
Relevant  and Appropriate  to CERCLA Re-
sponse Actions.
See 0446
Superfund Program Implementation Manual,
Fiscal Year  1994. Volume 1. Program Goals
and Planning Requirements. Volume 2. Pro-
gram Implementation Procedures.
See 0124
 Superfund Program  Management  Manual,
 Fiscal Year 1994.
 See 0073
 Superfund Progress. Aficionado's Version.
 Progress as of September 30, 1992.
 See 0327
 Superfund Progress: Fall/Winter 1992.
 See 0328
 Superfund:  Qualified  Disadvantaged  Busi-
 ness Utilization in State Response.
 See 0498
 Superfund Reform Act of 1994.
 See 0332
 SU-120
  r

-------
                                                      SUBJECT INDEX
                                                                                                              WASTE TREATMENT
  Superfund Remedial Program Financial Man-
  agement Authority,  Responsibilities and Pro-
  cedures.
  See 1137
  Superfund  Removal   Procedures:   Action
  Memorandum Guidance.
  See 1012
  Superfund:  Report  of the EPA Superfund
  Revitalization  Public Meeting Held on June
  24,1992. Volumes 1 and 2.
  See 0333
  Superfund Response Action Contracts.
  See 0074
  Superfund Responsiveness Summaries (Su-
  perfund Management Review:  Recommen-
  dation Number 43E).
  See 0125
  Superfund Revitalization: Measures of Suc-
  cess.
  See 0334
  Superfund  Technical  Assistance   Grant
  (TAG) Handbook.
  See 0499
  Superfund Technical Assistance Grants.
  See 0502
  Superfund  Technical   Assistance  Grants
  (Fact Sheet).
  See 0503
  Superfund  Technical  Assistance  Grants
  (TAGs) (Pamphlet).
  See 0505
  Supplemental  Guidance on Federal  Super-
  fund Liens.
  See 0885
  Supplemental  Guidance  on Performing Risk
  Assessments in Remedial Investigation/Fea-
  sibility Studies (RI/FSs). Conducted by Po-
  tentially Responsible Parties (PRPs).
  See 1078
  Supplemental  Guidance  to RAGS: Calculat-
  ing  the  Concentration  Term.  Volume  1,
  Number 1, May 1992.
  See 1079
  Supporting   State    Attorneys   General
  CERCLA  Remedial and Enforcement Activi-
  ties at NPL Sites.
  See 0506
  Technical Guidance  Document: Construction
  Quality  Management  for  Remedial  Action
  and Remedial Design Waste Containment
  Systems.
  See 1334
  Technical Resource Document:  Solidifica-
  tion/Stabilization   and  Its  Application  to
  Waste Materials.
  See 1565
  Technology  Demonstration Summary: Bio
  Trol Soil Washing System for Treatment of a
  Wood Preserving Site.
  See 1538
  Technology Evaluation  Report: Babcock and
  Wilcox Cyclone Furnace Vitrification  Tech-
  nology. Volume 1.
  See 1337
  Technology Evaluation  Report: Babcock and
  Wilcox Cyclone Furnace Vitrification  Tech-
  nology. Volume 2.
  See 1338
  Technology Evaluation Report:  Biotrol Soil
  Washing System  for Treatment of a  Wood
•  Preserving Site. Volume 1.
  See 1539
  Technology Evaluation Report:  Biotrol Soil
  Washing System  for Treatment of a  Wood
  Preserving Site. Volume 2, Part A.
  See 1540
  Technology Evaluation Report:  Biotrol Soil
  Washing  System  for Treatment of a  Wood
  Preserving Site. Volume 2, Part B.
  See 1541
 Technology  Transfer  Needs  Assessment,
 1990.
 See 1354
 Terra Vac In situ Vacuum Extraction System:
 Applications Analysis Report.
 See 1355
 Timely  Initiation   of   Responsible  Party
 Searches,  Issuance of  Notice Letters,  and
 Release of Information (Attachment XXII).
 See 0886
 Total Quality Management (TQM) and Qual-
 ity Assurance (QA) in Superfund.
 See 0996
 Toxic  Treatments  'In-situ'  Steam/Hot-Air
 Stripping Technology. Applications Analysis
 Report.
 See 1545
 Toxicological  Assessment  of  Hazardous
 Wastes.
 See 1358
 Tracking Toxic Substances at Industrial  Fa-
 cilities:  Engineering  Mass Balance  versus
 Materials Accounting.
 See 1362
 Transmittal of  Guidance on Use  and  En-
 forcement of CERCLA Information  Requests
 and Administrative Subpoenas.
 See 0887
 Transmittal of  Model Consent  Decree  for
 CERCLA  Section  104(e)  Information  Re-
 quest Enforcement Actions.
 See 0888
 Transmittal of the Final Waste Oil  Interim
• Enforcement Guidance Document.
 See 0889
 Treatability Studies Contractor Work Assign-
 ments.
 See 0076
 Treatability  Studies  Under  CERCLA:  An
 Overview.
 See 1172
 U.S. Bureau  of Reclamation Assistance to
 the Superfund Program.
 See 1138
 Understanding Superfund Risk Assessment.
 See 0508
 United  States  Environmental  Protection
 Agency Model  CERCLA RD/RA  Consent
 Decree.
 See 0890
 USAGE  Preplaced  and  Rapid Response
 Contracts.
 See 1139
 Use of CERCLA Section 106 Unilateral En-
 forcement for Remedial Design and Remedi-
 al Action: Strategy for Fiscal Year 1990.
 See 0891
 Use of  Removal Approaches to Speed  Up
 Remedial Action Projects.
 See 1140
 Use of Time and Materials and Cost Reim-
 bursement Subcontracts for  Remedial Ac-
tions under the Alternative Remedial Con-
tracting Strategy Contracts.
See 1141
USEPA Contract Laboratory Program Nation-
al  Functional  Guidelines  for Inorganic Data
Review.
See 0997
User's Guide to the Contract Laboratory Pro-
gram.
See 0079
Written Demand for CERCLA Cost Recov-
ery.
See 0894
Written Demand for Recovery of Costs  In-
curred  Under the  Comprehensive  Environ-
mental Response, Compensation, and  Liabil-
ity Act (CERCLA).
See 0895
WASTE PROCESSING
    Bioremediation Resource Guide and Biore-
    mediation Resource Matrix.
    See 1425
WASTE REMOVAL
 .   HSED SACM  Report. Volume 1, Number 1,
    January 1993.
    See 0096
    Model Administrative Order on Consent for
    Removal Actions.
    See 0574
    Model Unilateral Administrative Order for Re-
    moval Response Activities.
    See 0579
WASTE STORAGE
    Sector Sampling for VOC's during Remedi-
    ation of Superfund  Site at Shaver's Farm,
    Georgia.
    See 1417
WASTE TREATMENT
    Abstract Proceedings: Forum on Innovative
    Hazardous Waste Treatment Technologies;
    Domestic  and  International (2nd). Held  in
    Philadelphia,  Pennsylvania on  May  15-17,
    1990.
    See 1186
    Advancing  the  Use  of Treatment  Technol-
    ogies for Superfund Remedies.
    See 1191
    Air Stripping of Aqueous Solutions. Engineer-
    ing Bulletin.
    See 1371
    Air/Superfund  National Technical Guidance
    Study Series.  Emission Factors for Super-
    fund Remediation Technologies.
    See 1381
    Applications Analysis Report: Silicate Tech-
    nology Corporation's Solidification/Stabiliza-
    tion Technology for Organic and Inorganic
    Contaminants in Soils.
    See 1550
    Biological  Treatment  of Wood  Preserving
    Site Groundwater by BioTrol,  Inc.  Applica-
    tions Analysis Report.
    See 1433
    Carver-Greenfield  Process  (Trade  Name)
    Dehydro-Tech   Corporation.   Applications
    Analysis Report.
    See 1207
    Chemfix Technologies, Inc.  Solidification/
    Stabilization Process.  Application  Analysis
    Report.
    See 1551
    Chemical Dehalogenation  Treatability Stud-
    ies under CERCLA: An Overview.
    See 1153
    Chemical Dehalogenation Treatment: APEG
    Treatment.
    See 1210
    Chemical Oxidation Treatment.  Engineering
    Bulletin.
    See 1211
    Chemical   Waste     Management,    Inc.
    PO*WW*ER  (Trade  Name)  Evaporation-
   Catalytic Oxidation Technology.  Technology
    Evaluation Report. Volume 1.
   See 1213
   Chemical   Waste     Management,    Inc.
   PO*WW*ER  (Trade  Name)  Evaporation-
   Catalytic Oxidation Technology. Technology
   Evalution Report. Volume 2.
   See 1214
   Citizen's Guide to How Innovative Treatment
   Technologies  Are Being Successfully  Ap-
   plied at Superfund Sites.
   See 0455
   Citizen's Guide to Solvent Extraction.
   See 0459
                                                                                                                         SU-121

-------
WftSTE TREATMENT
       SUBJECT INDEX
    Citizen's Guide to Thermal Desorption.
    Sea 0460
    Compliance with Third Third Requirements
  '•'• Under the LDRs. Superfund LDR Guide No.
  =:8.	
    Sue 0418
    Control Technologies for Defunct lead Bat-
    tery Recycling Sites:  Overview  and Recent
    Developments. Volume 3.
    See 1220
    Covenants Not to Sue under SARA.
    Sea 0526
    CWM  PO'WW'ER (Trade Name) Evapora-
    tion-Catalytic Oxidation Technology: Applica-
  Jlif jtotjs. Analysis Report.
    Sea 1225
  «; Demonstration of  a Trial  Excavation at the
  1  McColl Supeifund Site.
    Sea 1226
    Demonstration of Waste Treatment Technol-
    ogies.
    Sao 1229
    Developments In  Chemical Treatment  of
    Contaminated Soil.
    See 1499
    Engineering Bulletin: Pyrolysis Treatment
    See 1234
    Engineering Bulletin: Slurry Walls.
    Sea 1235
    Engineering  Bulletin:  Technology Preselec-
  •i (Ion Data Requirements.
  I!:'." Sea 1405
    Evaluating Mixed Funding Settlements under
  i'.CERCLA.
    Sea 0537
  I"; EvaluaHorj of Alternative, Treatment Technol-
    ogies for CERCLA Soils and Debris (Summa-
    ry of Phase 1 and Phase 2).
  i; Sea 1504
  	'" Evaluatkjj} of GigurK^Water^ Extraction Rem-
  , i'edtes. yoibma'arCase'Studles''.!-!^.
  p see 1446;.	; ~  l"I   ',	,,,',  !
  Iri Forum  on  Innovative  Hazardous  Waste
  I  Treatment   Techhotogjes:  Domestic  and
    International Held In Atlanta,  Georgia  on
    June 19-21,1989. Abstract Proceedings.
  ;  See 1252	
    Forum  on  Innovative  Hazardous  Waste
    Treatment   Technologies:  Domestic  and
    International. Held in Atlanta,  Georgia  on
    June 19-21,1989. Technical Papers.
    5*41253
    Forum  on  Innovative  Hazardous  Waste
  ::  Treatment Technologies (3rd): Domestic and
    International, Held In Dallas, Texas on June
    11-13,1991. Technical Papers.
    Sea 1254
    Furthering the Use of Innovative Treatment
  •  Technologies in OSWER Programs.
    See 1255
    Furthering the Use of Innovative Treatment
    Technologies in OSWER Programs.
    See 1256
    Granular Activated Carbon Treatment. Engi-
  ii  Hearing Bulletin.
    S«» 1258	;	
    Guide for Conducting Testability Studies
    under CERCLA.
    See 1155
    Guide for Conducting Treatability Studies
    under CERCLA: Soil  Vapor Extraction. Inter-
    im Guidance.
    See 1163
    Guide  to  Discharging  CERCLA Aqueous
    Wastes to Publicly Owned Treatment Works
    (POTWs),
    See 0423
    Guide to Obtaining No Migration Variances
    for CERCLA Remedial Actions.
    See 6424	
Horsehead  Resource Development Compa-
ny, Inc. Flame Reactor Technology: Applica-
tions Analysis Report.
See 1263
Horsehead  Resource Development Compa-
ny, Inc., Flame  Reactor Technology. Tech-
nology Demonstration Summary.
See 1264
Immobilization Technology Seminar: Speaker
Slide Copies and Supporting Information.
See 1555
Innovative Operational  Treatment Technol-
ogies for Application to Superfund Site: Nine
Case Studies.
See 1269
Innovative Technology:  Slurry-Phase  Biode-
gradation.
See 1271
Innovative  Treatment Technologies: Over-
view and Guide to Information Sources.
See 1272
Innovative  Treatment Technologies: Semi-
Annual Status Report (Fourth Edition).
See 1273
Innovative  Treatment Technologies: Semi-
Annual  Status Report,  January  1991. First
Issue.
See 1274
Innovative  Treatment Technologies: Semi-
Annual Status Report. (Third Edition).
See 1275
Interim Guidance on Notice Letters, Negotia-
tions, and Information Exchange.
See 0560
Interim Policy on Mixed Funding Settlements
Involving the Preauthorizatlon of States or
Political Subdivisions.
See 0566
Interim  RCRA/CERCLA Guidance  on Non-
Contiguous Sites  and On-Site Management
on Waste and Treatment Residue.
See 0427
International Waste  Technologles/Geo-Con
In situ  Stabilization/Solidification:  Applica-
tions Analysis Report.
See  1557
Inventory   of  Treatability  Study  Vendors.
Volume 1.
See  1171
Literature Survey of Innovative Technologies
for  Hazardous  Waste  Site  Remediation,
1987-1991.
See 1281
Long-Term Contracting Strategy for Super-
fund - Implementation.
See 0043
Methodologies    for   Implementation   of
CERCLA Section 122(g) (1) (A) De Minimis
Waste  Contributor  Settlements  Proposals
and Agreements.
See 0572
Mobile/Transportable  Incineration  Treat-
ment
See 1481
Model Notice Letters.
See 0577
Obtaining a Soil and Debris Treatability Vari-
ance for Removal Actions. Superfund LDR
Guide No. 6B.
See 0430
 Physical/Chemical Treatment of Hazardous
Waste Sites: Speaker Slide Copies and Sup-
 porting Information.
See 1287
 Pilot-Scale Demonstration  of a Slurry-Phase
 Biological Reactor for Creosote-Contaminat-
 ed Soil. Applications Analysis Report.
 See 1426
 Pilot-Scale  Incineration  of  Contaminated
 Sludges from the  Bofors-Nobel Superfund
 Site.
 See 1289
Pilot-Scale' Incineration of Contaminated Soil
from the Purity Oil Sales and McColl Super-
fund Sites.
See 1290
Procuring Innovative Technologies at Reme-
dial Sites: Q's and  A's and Case Studies.
See 1132
Prospects for In situ Chemical Treatment for
Contaminated Soil.
See 1525
Remedial Action, Treatment, and Disposal of
Hazardous   Waste.   Proceedings  of   the
Annual Hazardous Waste Research Sympo-
sium (17th). Held in Cincinnati, Ohio on April
9-11,1991.
See 1135
Remedial Investigation: Site Characterization
and Treatability Studies.
See 1106
Alternating  Current Electrocoagulation  for
Superfund Site Remediation.
See 1192
Chemical Stabilization of Mixed Organic and
Metal Compounds. EPA SITE Program Dem-
onstration of the Silicate Technology Corpo-
ration Process.
See 1212
Control Technology: Estimating  Innovative
Technology Costs for the SITE Program.
See 1222
Demonstration  of  Hazardous  Waste  Site
Treatment Technologies.
See 1227
Demonstration of Microfiltration Technology.
See 1228
Demonstration Projects Under the  U.S. EPA
Superfund Innovative Technology Evaluation
Program.
See 1230
Description of EPA SITE Demonstration of
the HAZCON Stabilization  Process  at  the
Douglassvllle,  Pennsylvania Superfund  Site.
See 1552
EPA SITE Demonstration of the Horsehead
Resource Development Company Flame Re-
actor Technology.
See 1242
Evaluation of Waste Stabilized by the Solidi-
tech SITE Technology.
See 1554
Factors Affecting the Applicability of Plasma
Systems to the Cleanup of Superfund Sites.
See 1250
Results from the Stabilization Technologies
Evaluated by  the Site Program. New  Eng-
land Environmental Expo 90.
See 1558
SITE Demonstration of the  CF Systems Or-
ganics Extraction System.
See 1301
SITE Demonstration of the CHEMFIX Solidi-
fication/Stabilization Process at the Portable
 Equipment Salvage Company Site.
See 1559
 Solidification/Stabilization:  Is  It Always Ap-
 propriate.
 See 1560
 Solvent  Extraction  Processes: A  Survey of
 Systems in the SITE Program.
 See 1305
 Sorption,  Important in  Stabilized/Solidified
 Waste Forms.
 See 1563
 Resources for Preparing  Independent Gov-
 ernment Estimates for Remedial Contracting
 Work Assignments.
 See 0066
 ROD Annual Report, FY 1989.
 See 1111
 SU-122

-------
                                                      SUBJECT INDEX
                                                                                                               WATER POLLUTION
 Rotating Biological  Contactors.  Engineering
 Bulletin.
 See 1297
 Selection of Control Technologies for Reme-
 diation of Lead Battery Recycling Sites. (En-
 gineering Bulletin).
 See 1298
 SITE Emerging Technologies Project:  Bab-
 cock and Wilcox Cyclone Vitrification.
 See 1303
 Slurry Biodegradation.
 See 1428
 Solidification/Stabilization of Organics and
 Inorganics.
 See 1561
 Solvent Extraction Treatment.
 See 1306
 Summary of Treatment Technology Effec-
 tiveness for Contaminated Soil.
 See 1533
 Superfund  Engineering Issue: Treatment of
 Lead-Contaminated Soils.
 See 1535
 Superfund Innovative Technology Evaluation
 Program: Progress  and  Accomplishments,
 Fiscal Year 1989. A Third  Report to Con-
 gress.
 See 1311
 Superfund Innovative Technology Evaluation
 Program: Progress  and  Accomplishments,
 Fiscal Year 1990. A Fourth Report to Con-
 gress.
 See 1312
 Superfund Innovative Technology Evaluation
 Program:  Progress  and Accomplishments
 Fiscal Year 1991. A  5th Report to Congress.
 See 1313
 Superfund Innovative Technology Evaluation
 Program: Spring Update to  the  Technology
 Profiles. Fourth Edition.
 See 1314
 Superfund Innovative Technology Evaluation
 Program: Technology Profiles, Fifth Edition.
 See 1315
 Superfund Innovative Technology Evaluation
 Program: Technology Profiles, Sixth Edition.
 See 1318
 Superfund Innovative Technology Evaluation
 (SITE): Demonstration Bulletin. Flame Reac-
 tor,   Horsehead  Resource  Development
 Company, Inc.
 See 1319
 Superfund Innovative Technology Evaluation
 Technology Demonstration Summary: Chem-
 fix Solidification/Stabilization Process, Clack-
 amas, Oregon.
 See 1564
 Superfund  LDR  Guide  No. 3:  treatment
 Standards  and  Minimum Technology  Re-
 quirements  under Land Disposal Restrictions
 (LDRS).
 See 0442
 Superfund LDR  Guide No. 6A (2nd Edition)
 Obtaining a Soil and Debris Treatability Vari-
 ance for Remedial Actions.
 See 0445
 Synopses of Federal Demonstrations of In-
 novative Site Remediation Technologies.
 See 1324
Tech Trends (Number 10).
 See 1330
Tech  Trends:  The  Applied Technologies
Journal for Superfund Removals and Reme-
dial Actions and RCRA Corrective Actions.
 May 1993.
See 1333
Technical  Resource  Document:  Solidifica-
tion/Stabilization  and  Its   Application  to
Waste Materials.
See 1565
 Technology  Evaluation  Report  CHEMFIX
 Technologies,  Inc.,  Solidification/Stabiliza-
 tion Process, Clackamas, Oregon. Volume 2.
 See 1339
 Technology  Evaluation  Report:   Chemfix
 Technologies, Inc. Solidification/Stabilization
 Process, Clackamas, Oregon. Volume 1.
 See 1566
 Technology Evaluation Report: International
 Waste Technologies/Geo-Con In situ Stabili-
 zation/Solidification.   Volume   3.   Update
 Report.
 See 1567
 Technology Evaluation Report: International
 Waste Technologies/Geo-Con In situ Stabili-
 zation/Solidification.   Volume   4.   Update
 Report.
 See 1568
 Technology Evaluation Report of Retech's
 Plasma Centrifugal Furnace. Volume 1.
 See 1342
 Technology Evaluation Report of Retech's
 Plasma Centrifugal Furnace. Volume 2.
 See 1343
 Technology Evaluation Report: Ogden Circu-
 lating Bed  Combustor at  the McColl Super-
 fund Site.
 See 1344
 Technology Evaluation Report: Perox-Pure
 (Trade Name) Chemical Oxidation Technolo-
 gy-
 See 1345
 Technology Evaluation Report: Pilot-Scale
 Demonstration of a Slurry-Phase  Biological
 Reactor for  Creosote-Contaminated  Soil.
 Volume 1.
 See 1542
 Technology Evaluation Report: Site Program
 Demonstration of a Trial  Excavation at the
 McColl Superfund Site.
 See 1349
 Technology Evaluation Report: SITE  Pro-
 gram Demonstration Test,  Soliditech,  Inc.,
 Solidification/Stabilization  Process. Volume
 1.
 See 1570
 Technology Evaluation Report: SITE  Pro-
 gram Demonstration Test,  Soliditech,  Inc.
 Solidification/Stabilization  Process. Volume
 2.
 See 1571
 Thermal Desorption Treatment.
 See 1357
 Thermal Desorption Treatment  (February
 1994).
 See 1487
 Toronto Harbour Commissioners (THC) Soil
 Recycle Treatment Train. Applications Analy-
 sis Report.
 See 1544
 Treatability  Studies Contractor Work Assign-
 ments.
 See 0076
 Treatability  Studies  Under  CERCLA:  An
 Overview.
 See 1172
 Understanding Bioremediation: A Guidebook
 for Citizens.
 See 0507
 Vendor  Information Form  to be Completed
 for Participation in the: Vendor  Information
 System  for Innovative Treatment  Technol-
 ogies (VISITT).
 See 1369
Waiver of Headquarters Approval  for Issu-
ance of  RD/RA Special Notice Letters at the
Time  of ROD Signature  from  OERR  and
OWPE.
See 0893
 WASTE WATER
    Discharge  of  Wastewater  from  CERCLA
    Sites into POTWS.
    See 0421
    Ultrox International  Ultraviolet Radiation/Oxi-
    dation  Technology:  Applications  Analysis
    Report.
    See 1364
 WASTE WATER DISPOSAL
    CERCLA Site Discharges to  POTWs:  Guid-
    ance Manual.
    See 1576
 WASTES (INDUSTRIAL)
    Cleaning Up the Nation's Waste Sites: Mar-
    kets and Technology Trends.
    See 0132
 WATER ANALYSIS
    Filtration  of Ground  Water  Samples  for
    Metals Analysis.
    See 1454
 WATER CHEMISTRY
    Metals Testing Report: Metal Content of En-
    vironmental Samples from Region 4.
    See 1282
    Development and   Use of  Site-Specific
    Chemical and Biological Criteria for Assess-
    ing  New  Bedford  Harbor  Pilot  Dredging
    Project.
    See 1583
WATER FLOW
    Evaluation  of  Unsaturated/Valdose  Zone
    Models for Superfund Sites.
    See 1449
    Identification and Compilation of Unsaturat-
    ed/Vadose Zone Models.
    See 1464
WATER LEVELS
    Superfund Ground Water Issue: Accuracy of
    Depth to  Water  Measurements.  2nd  in
    Series of Issue Papers.
    See 1476
WATER POLLUTION
    Abstract  Proceedings:  Superfund Technical
    Support  Project General Meeting.  Held in
    Athens, Georgia on December 3-6, 1990.
    See 1187
    Achieving  Greater   Consistency   between
    Subjective and Objective Risks.
    See 1017
    ARARs Q's and A's Compliance with  New
    SDWA National Primary Drinking Water  Reg-
    ulations for Organic and Inorganic Chemi-
    cals.
    See 0400
    CERCLA Site Discharges to  POTWs: Guid-
    ance Manual.
    See 1576
    Engineering  Bulletin: Technology Preselec-
    tion Data Requirements.
    See 1405
    EPA/ORD    (Environmental     Protection
    Agency/Office of Research  and Develop-
    ment) Role and Perspective in Sediment Re-
    search.
    See 1585
    Evaluating  Amphibian  Responses  in Wet-
    lands Impacted by  Mining Activities in the
    Western United States.
    See 1586
    Facilitated Transport. Series of Issue Papers
    (3rd).
    See 1451
    Ground-Water Issue: The Effects  of  Well
    Casing Material on Ground Water-Quality.
    See 1457
                                                                                                                         SU-123

-------
WATER POLLUTION ABATEMENT
       SUBJECT INDEX
  	Ground Water Sampling for Metals Analyses.
    Suoof'und Ground Water Issue.
    S
-------
                                                        SUBJECT  INDEX
                                                              WOOD PRESERVATIVES
    Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Clean-
    up Efforts Nationwide, Spring 1993 (Harvey
    and Knott Drum  Site, New  Castle County,
    Delaware).
    See 0956
    Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Clean-
    up Efforts Nationwide, Spring 1993 (Triana/
    Tennessee River Site, Alabama).
    See 0960
    Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Clean-
    up Efforts Nationwide, Summer  1993 (Tri-
    State  Plating Site Profile, Columbus,  Indi-
    ana).
    See 0970
    Technology    Demonstration    Summary,
    DuPont/Oberlin Microfiltration System, Pal-
    merton, Pennsylvania. April-May 1992.
    See 1336
    Technology Evaluation Report:  Perox-Pure
    (Trade Name) Chemical Oxidation Technolo-
    gy-
    See 1345
    Technology  Evaluation Report: SITE  Pro-
    gram.   CF  Systems Organics  Extraction
    System,  New   Bedford,  Massachusetts.
    Volume 1.
    See 1346
    Technology  Evaluation Report: SITE  Pro-
    gram.   CF  Systems Organics  Extraction
    System,  New   Bedford,  Massachusetts.
    Volume 2.
    See 1347
    Technology  Evaluation Report: SITE  Pro-
    gram  Demonstration  of the DuPont/Oberlin
    Microfiltration Technology.
    See 1350
    Technology  Evaluation Report: SITE  Pro-
    gram  Demonstration  of the  Ultrox Interna-
    tional  Ultraviolet  Radiation/Oxidation Tech-
    nology.
    See 1351
    Terra Vac In situ Vacuum  Extraction System:
    Applications Analysis  Report.
    See 1355
WATER POLLUTION  CONTROL EQUIPMENT
    Air/Superfund National Technical Guidance
    Study  Series. Air Stripper Design Manual.
    See 1374
    Air/Superfund National Technical Guidance
    Study  Series. Comparisons of Air Stripper
    Simulations and Field Performance Data.
    See 1376
WATER POLLUTION  DETECTION
    Filtration  of  Ground Water  Samples  for
    Metals Analysis.
    See 1454
    Superfund Innovative Technology  Evaluation
    (SITE) Program Evaluation Report for Antox
    BTX Water Screen (BTX Immunoassay).
    See 1320
WATER POLLUTION  EFFECTS
    Application of a Water Quality Assessment
    Modeling  System  at a Superfund Site.
    See 1573
    Criteria for Choosing Indicator Species for
    Ecological Risk Assessments at  Superfund
    Sites (90-6402).
    See 1224
    Exxon  Valdez Oil Spill.  A  Report to  the
    President.
    See 0928
    Handbook: Responding  to  Discharges  of
    Sinking Hazardous Substances.
    See 1589
    Detoxification of Pentachlorophenol and Cre-
    osote  Contaminated  Groundwater by Physi-
    cal Extraction: Chemical and Biological  As-
    sessment.
    See 1438
    Understanding Oil Spills  and Oil  Spill  Re-
    sponse.
    See 0978
WATER POLLUTION EFFECTS (ANIMALS)
    Acid Volatile Sulfide Predicts the Acute Tox-
    icity of Cadmium and Nickel in Sediments.
    See 1572
    Using the DNA Alkaline Unwinding Assay to
    Detect DNA Damage in Laboratory and Envi-
    ronmentally Exposed Cells and Tissues.
    See 1368
WATER POLLUTION MONITORING
    Application of 'Real-Time' Monitoring in  De-
    cision  Making:  The New Bedford  Harbor
    Pilot Dredging Project.
    See 1574
WATER POLLUTION SAMPLING
    Chemical   Waste   Management,    Inc.
    PO*WW*ER  (Trade  Name)  Evaporation-
    Catalytic Oxidation Technology. Technology
    Evalution Report. Volume  2.
    See 1214
    Framework  for Real-Time Decision-Making:
    New Bedford  Harbor Pilot Dredging Study.
    See 1587
    Ground-Water Issue:  Potential Sources of
    Error in  Ground-Water Sampling at Hazard-
    ous Waste Sites.
    See 1456
    Filtration  of Ground Water Samples  for
    Metals Analysis.
    See 1454
WATER POLLUTION STANDARDS
    Presentations  EPA-State Soil  Standards
    Conference. Held in Crystal City, Virginia on
    January 29,1991.
    See 1524
WATER QUALITY
    Application of a Water Quality Assessment
    Modeling System at a Superfund Site.
    See 1573
    ARARS Q's and A's: Compliance with Fed-
    eral Water Quality Criteria.
    See 0399
    ARARs Q's and A's Compliance with New
    SDWA National Primary Drinking Water Reg-
    ulations  for Organic and Inorganic Chemi-
    cals.
    See 0400
WATER QUALITY MANAGEMENT
    Development  and   Use   of  Site-Specific
    Chemical and Biological Criteria for Assess-
    ing  New Bedford  Harbor  Pilot  Dredging
    Project.
    See 1583
    Superfund Ground Water  Issue: Accuracy of
    Depth to  Water  Measurements.  2nd  in
    Series of Issue Papers.
    See 1476
WATER TREATMENT
    CERCLA Site Discharges to POTWs: Guid-
    ance Manual.
    See 1576
    Performance Evaluations  of Pump-and-Treat
    Remediations.
    See 1471
    Field Evaluation  of the UV/Oxidation  Tech-
   'nology to Treat Contaminated Groundwater.
    Proceedings  of  the  National Conference
    (10th). Held in Washington, DC. on Novem-
    ber 27-29, 1989.
    See 1453
    Small  Systems  Meet Superfund  Challenge
    with Point-of-Entry Treatment Units.
    See 1304
    Ultrox International Ultraviolet Radiation/Oxi-
    dation Technology:  Applications  Analysis
    Report.
    See 1364
WATER WELLS
    Ground-Water Issue:  The  Effects  of  Well
    Casing Material on Ground Water-Quality.
    See 1457
    Tech Trends (Number 8).
    See 1328
WEST VIRGINIA
    National Priorities  List Sites: West Virginia.
    See 0288
    National Priorities  List Sites: West Virginia.
    See 0289
    National Priorities  List Sites: West Virginia,
    1992.
    See 0290
    Site Enforcement Tracking  System (SETS):
    PRP Listing by Site for West Virginia.
    See 0816
    Site Enforcement Tracking  System (SETS):
    PRP Listing by Site for West Virginia.
    See 0817
    Site Enforcement Tracking  System (SETS):
    PRP Listing by Site for West Virginia.
    See 0818
WESTINGHOUSE
    Superfund  Innovative Technology Evaluation
    Program Demonstration Plan for Westing-
    house  Bio-Analytic  Systems  Pentachloro-
    phenol Immunoassays.
    See 1310
WETLANDS
    Evaluating  Amphibian  Responses  in  Wet-
    lands  Impacted  by Mining  Activities in the
    Western United States.
    See 1586
    Handbook for Constructed Wetlands Receiv-
    ing Acid Mine Drainage.
    See 1588
WIMER (OREGON)
    Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Clean-
    up Efforts Nationwide, Summer 1993 (Rogue
    Valley/Ditch  Creek   Ranch  Site   Profile,
    Wimer, Oregon).
    See 0969
WISCONSIN
    National Priorities List Sites:  Wisconsin.
    See 0291
    National Priorities List Sites:  Wisconsin.
    See 0292
    National Priorities  List Sites:  Wisconsin,
    1992.
    See 0293
    Site Enforcement Tracking  System (SETS):
    PRP Listing by Site for Wisconsin.
    See 0819
    Site Enforcement Tracking  System (SETS):
    PRP Listing by Site for Wisconsin.
    See 0820
    Site Enforcement Tracking  System (SETS):
    PRP Listing by Site for Wisconsin.
    See 0821
WOOD PRESERVATIVES
    Biological  Treatment  of  Wood  Preserving
    Site Groundwater by BioTrol, Inc.  Applica-
    tions Analysis Report.
    See 1433
    BioTrol Soil Washing System for Treatment
    of a  Wood  Preserving Site:  Applications
    Analysis Report.
    See 1492
    Application  of   Tradescantia  Micronucleus
    Assay for In situ Evaluation  of Potential Ge-
    netic Hazards from Exposure to Chemicals
    at a Wood-Preserving Site.
    See 1195
                                                                                                                            SU-125

-------
WOOD PRODUCTS INDUSTRY
   it i1 in,   i      ' , i •  nil!'1.'   „  " i
          SUBJECT INDEX
    Chemical Stabilization of Mixed Organic and
    Metal Compounds. EPA SITE Program Dem-
    onstration ol the Silicate Technology Corpo-
    ration Process.
    See 1212
  :! EPA SITE Demonstration of the BioTrol Soil
    Washing Process.
    See 1502
  < Suporfund  Accelerated  Cleanup  Bulletin:
    Presumptive Remedies for  Wood Treatment
    Facilities. Volume 1, Number 2,  May 1992.
    See 0116
    Technology Evaluation  Report: Btotrol  Soil
    Washing System  for Treatment of a Wood
    Preserving Site. Volume 1.
    50*1539
    Technology Evaluation  Report: Biotrol  Soil
    Washing System  for Treatment of a Wood
    Preserving Sits. Volume 2. Part A.
    s«« 1540      .;;;;"   ".^	
  II Technology Evaluation  Report: Biotrol  Soil
  'Washing System  for Treatment of a Wood
  j Preserving Site, Volume 2, Part B.
  I See 1541  '^  ~~[   '"'^
  " Technology Evaluation Report  SITE  Pro-
    gram Demonstration. EPA RREL's Mobile
    Volume Reduction Unit
    Sea 1348
    Technology Selection Guide for Wood Treat-
    er Sites.
    See 1122
WOOD PRODUCTS INDUSTRY
    Evaluation of Emission Factors for Formal-
    dehyde from Certain Wood Processing Oper-
    ations. Final Report, May-August 1989.
    See 1410
WOOD TREATMENT FACILITIES
    Superfund  Accelerated  Cleanup  Bulletin:
    Presumptive Remedies for Wood Treatment
    Facilities. Volume 1, Number 2,  May 1992.
    See 0116
WORK SCOPE
    ECO Update. Volume 1, Number 4. Develop-
    ing  a Work Scope for Ecological  Assess-
    ments.
    See 1022
WORKERS
    Standard Operating Safety Guides.
    See 0924
WYOMING
    National Priorities List Sites: Wyoming.
    See 0294
    National Priorities List Sites: Wyoming.
    See 0295
    National Priorities List Sites: Wyoming, 1992.
    See 0296
                                                                                                            Site Enforcement Tracking  System (SETS):
                                                                                                            PRP Listing by Site for Wyoming.
                                                                                                            See 0822
                                                                                                            Site Enforcement Tracking  System (SETS):
                                                                                                            PRP Listing by Site for Wyoming.
                                                                                                            See 0823
                                                                                                            Site Enforcement Tracking  System (SETS):
                                                                                                            PRP Listing by Site for Wyoming.
                                                                                                            See 0824
                                                                                                         X-RAY FLUORESCENCE ANALYSIS
                                                                                                            X-ray Fluorescence Survey of Lead Contami-
                                                                                                            nated Residential Soils in Leadville, Colora-
                                                                                                            do: A Case Study.
                                                                                                            See 1549
                                                                                                         XYLENES
                                                                                                            Health Effects Assessment for Xylenes.
                                                                                                            See 1049
                                                                                                         YORK COUNTY (VIRGINIA)
                                                                                                            Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Clean-
                                                                                                            up Efforts Nationwide,  Summer 1993  (Chis-
                                                                                                            man Creek Site Profile, York County, Virgin-
                                                                                                            ia).
                                                                                                            See 0963
                                                                                                         ZINC
                                                                                                            Technology    Demonstration    Summary,
                                                                                                            DuPont/Oberlin  Microfiltration  System, Pal-
                                                                                                            merton, Pennsylvania. April-May 1992.
                                                                                                            See 1336
SU-126
li   | .:   ,,,;       lift1    :•   ; ;   . i|f;
ill i •• ..... iii:: , ........ i tiir ,;, ....... • ....... •. , JiiiiiL ii,^
      ...... in ....... iSiaai ...... b;,, ..... ...... iti, ......... fe!:i,:iiJ;iii ..... ..... iii ......... lii ........ 181111 ..... M^^     ..... K
                                                                                                            i. ii^        .•

-------

-------
                                                      	i	!	j""!	
	PI	
    i
h	
                                                                                                                                                                                                                              •IIHinliII1!ill  IIIII" III lillll'I'll"1 nil I  Hlllllil
                                                                                                  I	Hi.	i	
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                   iniiiiiiiiiNHiiiniPiiiii MIII    muni

-------
Number Index

-------
Number Index Sample Entry
Performing Organization
     report number •
CERI-90-16
          T|t]e     ' Physical/Chemical Treatment of Hazardous Waste Sites:
                  Speaker Slide Copies and Supporting Information
   NT1S Order number	PB91 -145433CDH

   Reference number	See 1287

-------
                                                  NUMBER  INDEX
AD-A193 502/2/CDH
  Installation  Restoration  Program.  Technical
  Support  Document  for Record  of  Decision,
  Cape Newenham, AFS.
  AD-A193 502/2/CDH             See 1276
AD-A202 315/8/CDH
  Installation  Restoration  Program  Technical
  Support Document for Record of Decision, Ta-
  talina Air Force Station LRRS Site.
  AD-A202 315/8/CDH             See 1277
AD-P006 468/3/CDH
  Toxicological  Assessment  of  Hazardous
  Wastes.
  AD-P006 468/3/CDH
                                 See 1358
AD-P006 908/8/CDH
  Dealing with Toxic Polluted Sediments in the
  Great Lakes Basin.
  AD-P006 908/8/CDH             See 1582
ATSDR/TP-88/06
  Toxicoiogical Profile for Benzo(b)Fluoranthene.
  PB90-247651/CDH               See 1360
ATSDR/TP-88/24
  Toxicological Profile for Trichloroethylene.
  PB90-127523/CDH               See 1361
CERCLA-005/1091
  Compendium of  CERCLA ARARs fact sheets
  and directives.
  DE92004878/CDH               See 0417
CERI-89-222
  Immobilization Technology Seminar:  Speaker
  Slide Copies and Supporting Information.
  PB90-127473/CDH               See 1555
CERI-90-16
  Physical/Chemical  Treatment  of  Hazardous
  Waste Sites: Speaker Slide Copies and  Sup-
  porting Information.
  PB91-145433/CDH                See 1287
CONTRIB-721
  Bench-Scale Evaluation of Alternative Biologi-
  cal Treatment Processes for the Remediation
  of Pentachlorophenol- and Creosote-Contami-
  nated Materials:  Slurry-Phase Bioremediation.
  PB92-129683/CDH                See 1419
CONTRIB-722
  Bench-Scale Evaluation of Alternative Biologi-
  cal Treatment Processes for the Remediation
  of Pentachlorophenol- and Creosote-Contami-
  nated Materials:  Solid-Phase Bioremediation.
  PB92-129725/CDH                See 1420
CONTRIB-728
  Biodegradation of Creosote and Pentachloro-
  phenol in Contaminated Groundwater: Chemi-
  cal and Biological Assessment.
  PB92-129659/CDH                See 1432
CONTRIB-732
  Detoxification of Pentachlorophenol and Creo-
  sote  Contaminated Groundwater by Physical
  Extraction:  Chemical  and Biological Assess-
  ment.
  PB92-129733/CDH                See 1438
 DCN-90-203-080-61-02
  Air/Superfund  National  Technical Guidance
  Series.  Superfund  Air   Pathway  Analyses
  Review Criteria Checklists.
  PB90-182544/CDH               See 1372
 DE87001323/CDH
  Draft Record of Decision  for the Aluminum
  Smelter Conservation/Modernization  Program.
  DE87001323/CDH                See 1087
 DE89007900/CDH
   Evaluation  of  Cleanup Levels for  Remedial
  Action at CERCLA (Comprehensive Environ-
  mental Response, Compensation and Liability
  Act) Sites Based on a Review of EPA (Envi-
  ronmental Protection Agency) Records of De-
  cision.
  DE89007900/CDH                See 1245
DE89010128/CDH
  Implementation  Plan for the Record of Deci-
  sion for  Disposal of Hanford  Defense,  High-
  Level, Transuranic, and Tank Wastes.
  DE89010128/CDH                See 1266
DE89010163/CDH
  Superfund Remedial Action Decision Process:
  Database for Selected FY87 Records of Deci-
  sion.
  DE89010163/CDH                See 1136
DE91014097/CDH
  Characterizing soils  for hazardous waste site
  assessments.
  DE91014097/CDH
See 1495
DE91016758/CDH
  Ground-Water Issue: Soil sampling and analy-
  sis for volatile organic compounds.
  DE91016758/CDH               See 1507
DE92004878/CDH
  Compendium of CERCLA ARARs fact sheets
  and directives.
  DE92004878/CDH               See 0417
DOE/BP-673
  Draft  Record of Decision for the Aluminum
  Smelter Conservation/Modernization Program.
  DE87001323/CDH               See 1087
DOE/RL-88-13
  Implementation Plan  for the  Record  of Deci-
  sion for Disposal of Hanford Defense High-
  Level, Transuranic, and Tank Wastes.
  DE89010128/CDH               See 1266
EPA/DF/DK-90/021A
  SARA (Superfund Amendments and Reauthor-
  ization Act) Section 313 Roadmaps Data Base.
  User's Manual. Version 2.10.
  PB90-174855/CDH               See 0304
EPA/DF/DK-90/044
  Site Enforcement Tracking  System  (SETS)
  (Region 1) (for Microcomputers).
  PB90-502618/CDH               See 0850
EPA/DF/DK-90/045
  Site Enforcement Tracking  System  (SETS)
  (Region 2) (for Microcomputers).
  PB90-502626/CDH               See 0852
EPA/DF/DK-90/046
  Site Enforcement Tracking  System  (SETS)
  (Region 3) (for Microcomputers).
  PB90-502634/CDH               See 0854
EPA/DF/DK-90/047
  Site  Enforcement Tracking  System  (SETS)
  (Region 4) (for Microcomputers).
  PB90-502642/CDH                See 0856
EPA/DF/DK-90/048
  Site  Enforcement Tracking  System  (SETS)
  (Region 5) (for Microcomputers).
  PB90-502659/CDH                See 0858
EPA/DF/DK-90/049
  Site  Enforcement Tracking  System  (SETS)
  (Region 6) (for Microcomputers).
  PB90-502667/CDH                See 0860
EPA/DF/DK-90/050
  Site  Enforcement Tracking  System  (SETS)
  (Region 7) (for Microcomputers).
  PB90-502675/CDH                See 0862
EPA/DF/DK-90/051
  Site  Enforcement  Tracking System (SETS)
  (Region 8) (for Microcomputers).
  PB90-502683/CDH               See 0864
EPA/DF/DK-90/052
  Site  Enforcement  Tracking System (SETS)
  (Region 9) (for Microcomputers).
  PB90-502691 /CDH               See 0866
EPA/DF/DK-90/033
  Site  Enforcement  Tracking System (SETS)
  (Region 10) (for Microcomputers).
  PB90-502709/CDH               See 0868
EPA/DF/DK-91/005
  Site  Enforcement  Tracking System (SETS)
  (Region  2-31/2 Inch  Diskette  IBM PS/2
  Compatible) (for Microcomputers).
  PB92-500149/CDH               See 0851
EPA/DF/DK-92/004
  Site  Enforcement  Tracking System  (SETS)
  (Region  1-31/2 Inch  Diskette  IBM PS/2
  Compatible) (for Microcomputers).
  PB92-500131/CDH               See 0849
EPA/DF/DK-92/006
  Site  Enforcement  Tracking System  (SETS)
  (Region  3-31/2 Inch  Diskette  IBM PS/2
  Compatible) (for Microcomputers).
  PB92-500156/CDH                See 0853
EPA/DF/DK-92/007
  Site  Enforcement  Tracking  System  (SETS)
  (Region  4-31/2 Inch  Diskette  IBM PS/2
  Compatible) (for Microcomputers).
  PB92-500164/CDH                See 0855
EPA/DF/DK-92/008
  Site  Enforcement  Tracking  System  (SETS)
  (Region  5-31/2 Inch  Diskette  IBM PS/2
  Compatible) (for Microcomputers).
  PB92-500172/CDH                See 0857
EPA/DF/DK-92/009
  Site  Enforcement  Tracking  System  (SETS)
  (Region  6-31/2 Inch  Diskette  IBM PS/2
  Compatible) (for Microcomputers).
  PB92-500180/CDH                See 0859
EPA/DF/DK-92/010
  Site  Enforcement Tracking  System  (SETS)
  (Region 7-31/2 Inch Diskette  IBM PS/2
  Compatible) (for Microcomputers).
  PB92-500198/CDH                See 0861
EPA/DF/DK-92/011
  Site  Enforcement Tracking  System  (SETS)
  (Region 8-3 1/2 Inch Diskette IBM PS/2
  Compatible) (for Microcomputers).
  PB92-500206/CDH                See 0863
EPA/DF/DK-92/012
  Site  Enforcement Tracking  System  (SETS)
  (Region 9-31/2 Inch Diskette IBM PS/2
  Compatible) (for Microcomputers).
  PB92-500214/CDH               See 0865
 EPA/DF/DK-92/013
  Site  Enforcement Tracking  System  (SETS)
  (Region 10 - 3 1/2 Inch Diskette IBM PS/2
  Compatible) (for Microcomputers).
  PB92-500222/CDH               See 0867
 EPA/DF/DK-93/076
  Site  Assessment Information Directory (SAID)
  Region  1 (for Microcomputers). Date of Cover-
  age: October 1991.
  PB93-506111 /CDH               See 0382
                                                                                                                             NU-1

-------
    I!	I
  EPA/DF/DK-93/077
    I "              '"I

  EPA/DF/DK-93/077
    Slt« Assessment Information Directory (SAID)
    Ragten 2 (for Microcomputers). Date of Cover-
    age: October 1991.
    PS93-506129/CDH               See 0383
  EPA7DF/DK-93/078
    Sitf Asspssme,ot Information Directory (SAID)
    Region 3 (for Microcomputers). Date of Cover-
    tip: October 1991.
    FB83.506137/CQH               See 038*
  EPA/DF/DK-93/079 ..... ........... ' ..... ..... "  ' '  " ........ ......
    Sfto Assessmont InformaHon Directory (SAID)
    Region 4 (for Microcomputers). Date of Cover-
    ag*; Octobef 1991.
    PB93-506145/CDH                See 0385
  EPA/DF/DK-93/080
    Sit* Assessment Information Directory (SAID)
    Region 5 (for Microcomputers).  Date of Cover-
    age: 1391.
    PB93-506152/CDH               See 0386
  EPA/DF/DK-93/081
   3H«  Assessment Information  Directory (SAID)
   Region 6 (for Microcomputers). Date of Cover-
   age: October 1991.
   PBi3.506160/CDH               See 0387
  EPA/DF/OIC-93/Oa2 ""   """"""'        .....
   Sfia Assessmont Information  Directory (SAID)
   Region 7 (for Microcomputers). Date of Cover-
   age' October 1991.
   P893.506178/QOH               See 0388
 EPA/DF/DK-93/083
   Sto Assessment Information  Directory (SAID)
   Region 8 (for Microcomputers). Date of Cover-
   age 1991.
   P893-506186/CDH               See 0389
 EPA/DF/DK-93/084
                  InformaHon Directory (SAID)
   R«gton 9 (for Microcomputers). Date of Cover-
   age; October 1991.
   PB83-506194/CDH               See 0390
 EPA/pF/pK-93/085
   Siia Assessmont Information Directory (SAID)
   Region 10 (for Microcomputers). Date of Cov-
   erage: October 1991.
   P893-506202/CDH               See 0391
 EPA/DF-82/014
   Nofflteatlon  of  Hazardous Substance  Sites
   (Section 103(c)).
   P882-191990/CDH               See 1147
 EPA/IMSD-90/013
   Hazardous Waste Superfund Collection: Data-
   base Thesaurus.
   PB91-131326/COH              See 0138
 EPA/SW/DK-90/025A
   Organic  Contract  Compliance  Screening
   System (OCCSS) Software for the PC (Version
   2/90) Usar Manual.
   PB90.213844/CPH               See 0048
 EPA/SW/DK-90/026A
   Inorganic  Contract  Compliance  Screening
  System (ICCSS) Software for the PC (Version
  3/90) Usor Manual.
  PBSO-213836/CDH               See 0035
 EPA/SW/DK-92/002
  PA-Sopre  (Preliminary  Assessment   Score),
  Version 1.0 (for Microcomputers).
  P892-500032/CDH               See 0368
 EPA/SW/DK-92/002A
  PA:Sopr« Software, Version 1.0. Users Manual
  ana Tutorial.
  PB92-963302/CDH               See 0371
            NUMBER INDEX
  EPA/SW/DK-92/031
   Organic  Contract   Compliance  Screening
   System (OCCSS)  Software  (SOW OLM01.8
   Version January 1992)  (Version 1) (for Micro-
   computers).
   PB92-501535/CDH               See 0056
  EPA/SW/DK-92/031A
   Organic  Contract   Compliance  Screening
   System. Software for the PC (OLM01.8 Version
   1). User Manual.
   PB92-145564/CDH               See 0057
  EPA/SW/DK-92/032
   Organic  Contract   Compliance   Screening
   System (OCCSS) Software (SOW March 1990)
   (Version 1) (for Microcomputers).
   PB92-501527/CDH               See 0055
  EPA/SW/DK-92/032A
   Organic  Contract   Compliance   Screening
   System. Software for the  PC (SOW March
   1990, Version 1). User Manual.
   PB92-145572/CDH               See 0059
 EPA/SW/DK-92/033
   Inorganic   Contract   Compliance  Screening
   System (ICCSS) Software (SOW March 1990)
   (Version 1) (for Microcomputers).
   PB92-5P1519/CDH               See 0040
 EPA/SW/DK-92/033A
   Inorganic  Contract   Compliance   Screening
   System Software for the PC (SOW March 1990
   Version 1). User Manual.
   PB92-145598/CDH               See 0041
 EPA/SW/DK-92/034
   Organic   Contract  Compliance   Screening
   System (OCCSS) Software (SOW February
   1988) (for  Microcomputers).
   PB92-501501/CDH               See 0054
 EPA/SW/DK-92/034A
   Organic   Contract  Compliance   Screening
   System. Software  for the PC (Version June
   1990). User Manual.
   PB92-145580/CDH               See 0060
 EPA/SW/DK-92/043
   Organic   Contract  Compliance   Screening
   System  (OCCSS) Software (OLM01.8  Version
   2) (for Microcomputers).
   PB92-502202/CDH                See 0049
 EPA/SW/DK-92/043A
   Organic   Contract   Compliance   Screening
   System. Software for the PC (OLM01.8  Version
   2) (User Manual).
   PB92-169564/CDH                See 0058
 EPA/SW/DK-92/046
   Environmental  Monitoring  Methods   Index
   (EMMI), Version 1.0 (for Microcomputers).
   PB92-503093/CDH                See 1239
 EPA/SW/DK-92/048
   Preliminary Ranking Evaluation Score  (PREs-
  oore) Version 1.1 (for  Microcomputers).
  PB92-503507/CDH                See 0372
 EPA/SW/DK-92/050
  Environmental  Monitoring  Methods   Index
  (EMMI), Version 1.0 (5 - User LAN) (for Micro-
  computers).
  PB92-504257/CDH                See 1238
EPA/SW/DK-92/051
  Environmental  Monitoring  Methods   Index
  (EMMI), Version 1.0 (Unlimited  User LAN) (for
  Microcomputers).
  PB92-504265/CDH               See 1240
EPA/SW/DK-92/053A
  AutoMOUSE:  An Improvement to the MOUSE
  Computerized  Uncertainty Analysis  System
  Operational Manual.
  PB93-100113/CDH                See 1201
                                                       I
  EPA/SW/DK-93/002
   Organic  Contract   Compliance  Screening
   System (OCCSS) Software (OLM01.8 Version
   3) (for Microcomputers).
   PB93-500270/CDH               See 0050
  EPA/SW/DK-93/003
   Inorganic  Contract  Compliance  Screening
   System (ICCSS) Software (ILM02.1 Version 2)
   (for Microcomputers).
   PB93-500288/CDH               See 0036
  EPA/SW/DK-93/008
   PA-Score  (Preliminary  Assessment  Score),
   Version 2.1, 5 1/4 inch (for Microcomputers).
   PB93-500346/CDH               See 0370
  EPA/SW/DK-93/009
   PA-Score  (Preliminary  Assessment  Score),
   Version 2.1, 3 1/2 inch (for Microcomputers).
   PB93-500353/CDH               See 0369
 EPA/SW/DK-93/046
   Organic   Contract   Compliance   Screening
   System (OCCSS) Software (OLM01.8  Version
   4) (for Microcomputers).
   PB93-505345/CDH               See 0051
 EPA/SW/DK-93/047
   Inorganic  Contract   Compliance  Screening
   System (ICCSS) Software (ILM02.1 Version 3)
   (for Microcomputers).
   PB93-505352/CDH               See 0037
 EPA/SW/DK-93/066
   Preliminary Ranking  Evaluation Score (PREs-
   core) Version 2.0 (for Microcomputers).
   PB93-505915/CDH               See 0373
 EPA/SW/DK-93/066A
   PREscore Software: Users Manual and Tutorial
   Version 2.0.
   PB93-192698/CDH               See 0375
 EPA/SW/DK-93/073
   Organic   Contract  Compliance  Screening
   System (OCCSS) Software (OLM01.8 Version
   5) (for Microcomputers).
   PB93-506053/CDH               See 0052
 EPA/SW/DK-94/072
   Inorganic  Contract   Compliance  Screening
   System (ICCSS) Software (ILM02.1 Version 4)
   (for Microcomputers).
   PB94-500642/CDH              See 0038
 EPA/SW/DK-94/084
   Organic    Contract  Compliance  Screening
   System (OCCSS) Software (OLM01.8 Version
   6) (for Microcomputers).
   PB94-501335/CDH              See 0053
 EPA/SW/DK-94/085
   Inorganic   Contract  Compliance  Screening
  System (ICCSS) Software (ILM02.1 Version 5)
  (for Microcomputers).
  PB94-501467/CDH               See 0039
 EPA/101/F-90/027
  Some Major Factors Important in  Establishing
  Land  Use  Policy for  Remediated Superfund
  Sites.
  PB90-256686/CDH               See 0308
EPA/101/F-90/031
  Ecosystem Effects of Superfund. National Pri-
  ority  List  Sites  in Industrial  Landscapes:  A
  Framework for Policy Decisions.
  PB90-256728/CDH               See 0135
EPA/101/F-90/051
  Criteria for Choosing Indicator Species for  Eco-
  logical Risk Assessments at Superfund Sites
  (90-6402).
  PB91-204321/CDH               See 1224
NU-2

-------
                                                       NUMBER INDEX
                                                                   EPA/451/R-93/003
EPA/171/R-92/005
  Estimating  VOC  Emissions  from  Superfund
  Sites in  the  Houston-Galveston Texas Area.
  (NNEMS Project No. 1302).
  PB92-196013/CDH                See 1406
EPA/171/R-92/017
  Future Land Use Scenarios for Federal Facili-
  ties.
  PB92-182427/CDH                See 0897
EPA/230/03-89/043
  Nature and Extent of Ecological Risks at Su-
  perfund Sites and RCRA (Resource Conserva-
  tion and  Recovery Act)  Facilities (Executive
  Summary Included).
  PB90-137316/CDH                See 1060
EPA/230/03-89/044
  Ecological   Risk  Assessment  Methods:   A
  Review and Evaluation of Past Practices in the
  Superfund  and RCRA (Resource Conservation
  and Recovery Act) Programs (Executive Sum-
  mary Included).
  PB90-137324/CDH                See 1024
EPA/230/03-89/045
  Ecological  Risk Management in the Superfund
  and RCRA (Resource  Conservation and  Re-
  covery Act) Programs.
  PB90-137332/CDH                See 1025
EPA/230/03-89/046
  Summary  of  Ecological  Risks,  Assessment
  Methods, and  Risk Management Decisions in
  Superfund and RCRA (Resource Conservation
  and Recovery Act).
  PB90-137340/CDH                See 1077
EPA/230/04-90/077
  Communicating with the Public About Hazard-
  ous Materials: An Examination of Local Prac-
  tice. Risk Communication Series.
  PB90-235938/CDH               See 0464
EPA/230/11-89/071
  Achieving  Greater Consistency between Sub-
  jective and Objective Risks.
  PB90-229832/CDH               See 1017
EPA/230/R-92/014
  Methods  for  Evaluating  the  Attainment  of
  Cleanup Standards. Volume  2. Ground Water.
  PB94-138815/CDH               See 1469
EPA/300/B-94/002
  BEN: A Model to Calculate the Economic Ben-
  efits of Noncompliance. User's  Manual  (Re-
  vised).
  PB94-141652/CDH               See 1205
EPA/402/R-92/005
  Computer Models  Used to  Support  Cleanup
  Decision-Making at Hazardous and Radioactive
  Waste Sites.
  PB93-183333/CDH               See 1218
 EPA/402/R-93/011
  Environmental Characteristics  of EPA, NRG,
  and DOE  Sites Contaminated with Radioactive
  Substances.
  PB93-185551/CDH               See 1237
 EPA/402/R-93/084
  Issues Paper on Radiation Site Cleanup Regu-
  lations.
   PB94-112349/CDH               See 1280
 EPA/402/S-94/001
   Meeting Summary: National Advisory Council
  on Environmental Policy and Technology (1st).
  Subcommittee on  Radiation Cleanup  Regula-
  tion. Held in  Washington, DC. on October 18-
   19, 1993.
   PB94-136678/CDH                See 1059
EPA/430/09-89/008
  Overview of Selected EPA (Environmental Pro-
  tection Agency) Regulations and Guidance Af-
  fecting  POTW  (Publicly Owned  Treatment
  Works) Management.
  PB90-129263/CDH                See 0432
EPA/440/6-90/008
  Compendium of Federal Financial  Assistance
  Programs:  Targeting Programs for State and
  Local Ground-Water Protection.
  PB93-116069/CDH                See 1435
EPA/450/1-89/001
  Air/Superfund  National  Technical  Guidance
  Study Series.  Volume 1.  Application  of Air
  Pathway Analyses for Superfund Activities.
  PB90-113374/CDH                See 1390
EPA/450/1-89/001A
  Air/Superfund  National  Technical  Guidance
  Study Series. Volume  1.  Overview of Air Path-
  way  Assessments  for Superfund  Sites (Re-
  vised).
  PB93-173987/CDH                See 1391
EPA/450/1-89-002A
  Air/Superfund  National  Technical  Guidance
  Study Series. Volume 2. Estimation of Baseline
  Air Emissions at Superfund Sites (Revised).
  PB90-270588/CDH                See 1392
EPA/450/1-89/004
  Air/Superfund  National  Technical  Guidance
  Study Series. Volume 4. Procedures for Disper-
  sion Modeling and Air Monitoring for Superfund
  Air Pathway Analysis.
  PB90-113382/CDH                See 1394
EPA/450/1-90/001
  Air/Superfund  National  Technical  Guidance
  Series.  Superfund  Air   Pathway   Analyses
  Review Criteria Checklists.
  PB90-182544/CDH                See 1372
EPA/450/1-90/002
  Air/Superfund  National  Technical Guidance
  Study Series. Comparisons of Air Stripper Sim-
  ulations and Field Performance Data.
  PB90-207317/CDH               See 1376
EPA/450/1-90/003
  Air/Superfund  National Technical Guidance
  Study Series. Air Stripper Design Manual.
  PB91-125997/CDH               See 1374
EPA/450/1-90/005
  Air/Superfund  National Technical  Guidance
  Study Series. Contingency Plans at Superfund
  Sites Using Air Monitoring.
  PB91-102129/CDH               See 1378
EPA/450/1-91/001
  Air/Superfund  National Technical  Guidance
  Study Series. Emission  Factors for Superfund
  Remediation Technologies.
  PB91-190975/CDH                See 1381
 EPA/450/1-91/002
  Air/Superfund National  Technical  Guidance
  Study Series: Estimation of Air Impacts for Air
  Stripping of Contaminated Water.
   PB91-211888/CDH                See 1382
 EPA/450/1-91/003
  Air/Superfund  National  Technical  Guidance
   Study  Series.  Database   of  Emission  Rate
   Measurement Projects.
   PB91-222059/CDH               See 1379
 EPA/450/1-92/001
   Air/Superfund  National  Technical  Guidance
   Study Series: Estimation of Air Impacts for Soil
   Vapor Extraction (SVE) Systems.
   PB92-143676/CDH               See 1383
EPA/450/1-92/002
  Air/Superfund National  Technical  Guidance
  Study Series. Guideline for Predictive Baseline
  Emissions  Estimation  Procedures  for Super-
  fund Sites.
  PB92-171909/CDH                See 1387
EPA/450/1-92/003
  Air Superfund  National  Technical  Guidance
  Study Series. Screening Procedures for Esti-
  mating the Air Impacts of Incineration at Su-
  perfund Sites.
  PB92-171917/CDH                See 1389
EPA/450/1-92/004
  Air Superfund  National  Technical  Guidance
  Study Series. Estimation  of Air Impacts for the
  Excavation of Contaminated Soil.
  PB92-171925/CDH                See 1384
EPA/450/4-89/015
  Guidance on Applying the Data Quality Objec-
  tives  Process  for  Ambient  Air  Monitoring
  Around Superfund Sites (Stages 1 and 2).
  PB90-204603/CDH                See 0988
EPA/450/4-89/020
  Review and Evaluation of Area Source Disper-
  sion Algorithms for Emission Sources at Super-
  fund  Sites.
  PB90-142753/CDH                See 1416
EPA/450/4-90/005
  Guidance on Applying the Data Quality Objec-
  tives  Process  for  Ambient  Air   Monitoring
  Around Superfund Sites (Stage 3).
  PB90-204611 /CDH                See 0987
EPA/450/4-90/014
  Air/Superfund  National  Technical Guidance
  Study Series. Development of Example Proce-
  dures for  Evaluating  the Air  Impacts of Soil
  Excavation Associated with Superfund  Reme-
  dial Actions.
  PB90-255662/CDH                See 1380
EPA/450/R-93/505
  Hydraulic  Fracturing Technology:  Technology
  Evaluation  Report  and  Application Analysis
  Report.
  PB94-100161 /CDH                See 1265
EPA/451/R-92/001
  Air/Superfund  National  Technical Guidance
  Study Series: Applicability of Open Path Moni-
  tors for Superfund.
  PB93-138154/CDH                See 1375
EPA/451/R-92/002
  Assessing Potential Indoor Air Impacts for Su-
  perfund Sites. Air/Superfund  National Techni-
  cal Guidance Study Series.
  PB93-122257/CDH                See 1395
EPA/451/R-93/001
  Air/Superfund  National  Technical Guidance
  Study Series. Models for Estimating Air Emis-
  sion Rates from Superfund Remedial Actions.
  PB93-186807/CDH               See 1388
 EPA/451/R-93/002
  Air/Superfund  National  Technical  Guidance
  Study  Series.  Air  Emissions  from   Area
  Sources: Estimating Soil and  Soil-Gas Sample
   Number Requirements.
   PB93-173995/CDH               See 1373
 EPA/451/R-93/003
   Estimation of Air Impacts for Bioventing Sys-
   tems Used  at Superfund  Sites. Air/Superfund
   National Technical Guidance Study Series.
   PB93-215655/CDH                See 1407
                                                                                                                              NU-3

-------
 EPA/451/R-93/004
            NUMBER INDEX
 EPA/4S1/R-93/004
   Alr/Suporfund  National Technical  Guidance
   Study Series: Estimation of Air Impacts from
   Area Sources of Particulate Matter Emissions
   at Sufxxfund Sites.
   PB93-215648/COH                See 1385
 EPi/451/R-93/005
   Estimation of Air Impacts for Thermal Desorp-
   tlbn Uoits Used at Superfund Sites. Air/Super-
   furjd  National Technical  Guidance  Study
   Series.
   P,B93-21563q/CDH                See 1409
 EPA/451/R-93/006
   EsSmation'of Air Impacts for Solidification and
   Stabifeaiion  Processes Used  at Superfund
   SUm,  AJr/Superfund National Technical Guid-
   aixsa Study Swtes.
   PS93-215622/CDH                See 1408
 EPA/4S1/R-93/007 	
   Ajr/Supflrfund	Nattonal "Technical  Guidance
   Study Series. Volume 4. Guidance for Ambient
   Air Monitoring at Superfund Sites (Revised).
   P893-199214/COH                See 1393
 EPA/451/R.93/008  ""'   ' ""
   Alr/Suporfund National  Technical  Guidance
   Study  Series: Compilation  of  Information on
   Resl-TJma Air Monitoring for Use at Superfund
   Sitos.
   P§|3-199222/CDH                See 1377
 EPA/4S1/R-93/009
   Atr/Suporfund National Technical  Guidance
   Study  S«ries: Evaluation  of Snort-Term Air
   Action Lavote for Superfund Sites.
   PB93-200913/CDH               See 1386
 EPA/451/R-93/P12
   Options for Developing  and Evaluating Mitiga-
   tfon  Strategies for Indoor Air  Impacts  at
   CERCLA Sttas, Alr/Superfund National Techni-
   cal Guidance Study Series, Report ASF-36.
   PS94-110517/COH               See 1415
 EPA/454/R-92/014
   Comparison  of a Revised Area Source Algo-
   rithm for the  Industrial Source Complex Short
   Term Model and Wind Tunnel Data.
   PS83-226751/CDH               See 1216
 EPA/454/R-93/001	
   Contingency Analysis Modeling  for Superfund
   Sites and Other Sources.
   PB93-169126/CDH               See1219
 EPA/4'54/V-92-002" ,""","'   """'  \      ".'!,.!'
   Instructional Package on Regulatory Air Quality
   Modfling. Part 1: Videos on the 'Guideline on
  Air Quality Models (Revised)' and the Model
  Clearinghouse (Video).
   PS84-780012/C0H                See 1412
 EPA/6pO/B-92/p06	
  Ground-Water Modeling  Compendium. Model
  Fad Sheets, Descriptions, Applications and
  Aitflismf rjt Framtwork.
  P|g3i.207504/CDHi;;'   „,;,„,„  '     366,145?,
 EPA/600/K-93/001
  In situ treatment'"of' Contaminated  Ground
  Watw;  An Inventory of Research and  Reid
  D«monstrations and  Strategies  for Improving
  Ground Water Remediation Technologies.
  P893.193720/CDH                See 1466
EPA/520/1-89/012
  Ctwacterizatkin of Contaminated Son from the
  MonlcWr/Gton Ridge, New Jersey, Superfund
       168063/CDH
                                  See 1493
 EPA/520/F-92/001
   Superfund Information  Repositories  and Ad-
   ministrative Records:  Introduction for  Librar-
   ians.
   PB92-963621/CDH                See 0497
 EPA/520/F-92/002
   Superfund Information  Repositories  and Ad-
   ministrative Records.
   PB92-963622/CDH                See 0884
 EPA/520/F-92/003
   Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Cleanup
   Efforts Nationwide (White Chemical).
   PB92-963611/CDH                See 0971
 EPA/520/F-92/004
   Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Cleanup
   Efforts Nationwide (Bog Creek Farm).
   PB92-963612/CDH                See 0940
 EPA/520/F-92/005
   Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Cleanup
   Efforts Nationwide, Fall 1992. (Celanese Cor-
   poration Site Profile).
   PB92-963617/CDH                See 0943
 EPA/520/F-92/006
   Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Cleanup
   Efforts Nationwide, Fall 1992. (Valley of the
   Drums, Bullitt County, Kentucky).
   PB92-963618/CDH               See 0947
 EPA/520/F-92/007
   Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Cleanup
   Efforts Nationwide (City  Industries).
   PB92-963619/CDH               See 0941
 EPA/520/F-92/008
   Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Cleanup
   Efforts Nationwide (McKin Company).
   PB92-963620/CDH               See 0953
 EPA/520/F-92/009
   Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Cleanup
   Efforts Nationwide, Fall  1992. (American Ther-
   mostat Corporation, New York).
   PB92-963627/CDH               See 0942
 EPA/526/F-92/010
   Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Cleanup
   Efforts Nationwide, Fall 1992.  (Wide Beach
   Section of Brant, New York).
   PB92-963628/CDH               3660948
 EPA/520/F-92/011
   Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Cleanup
	Efforts  Nationwide,  Fall  1992,  (Krysowaty
   Farm, Hillsbprqugh, New Jersey).
   PB92-963629/CDH                See 0945
 EPA/520/F-92/015
   Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste  Cleanup
   Efforts Nationwide, Winter 1993. (Wells G and
   H Site, Woburn, Massachusetts).
   PB93-963601/CDH                See 0972
 EPA/520/F-92/016
   Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Cleanup
   Efforts Nationwide, Fall 1992. (Lansdowne Ra-
   dioactive Residence Site Profile).
   PB92-963625/CDH                See 0946
 EPA/520/F-92/017
   Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Cleanup
   Efforts Nationwide, Fall 1992. (Ciba-Geigy Cor-
   poration, Mclntosh, Alabama).
   PB92-963630/CDH                See 0944
 EPA/520/F-93/001
  Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Cleanup
  Efforts Nationwide, Spring 1993 (Triana/Ten-
  nessee River Site, Alabama).
  PB93-963603/CDH                See 0960
  EPA/520/F-93/002
    Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Cleanup
    Efforts   Nationwide,   Spring  1993   (United
    Chrome Products Site Profile).
    PB93-963607/CDH               See 0961
  EPA/520/F-93/003
    Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Cleanup
    Efforts Nationwide, Spring 1993 (Old Midland
    Products Site Profile, Yell County, Arkansas).
    PB93-963608/CDH               See 0957
  EPA/520/F-93/004
    Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Cleanup
    Efforts Nationwide, Spring 1993 (French Limit-
    ed Site Profile, Harris County, Texas).
    PB93-963609/CDH               See 0954
  EPA/520/F-93/005
    Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Cleanup
    Efforts Nationwide, Spring 1993 (Powersville
    Site Profile, Peach County, Georgia).
    PB93-963611 /CDH               See 0958
  EPA/520/F-93/006
    Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Cleanup
    Efforts  Nationwide,   Spring   1993   (Radium
    Chemical Site Profile, Queens, New York).
    PB93-963612/CDH               See 0959
  EPA/520/F-93/007
    Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste  Cleanup
    Efforts Nationwide, Spring 1993 (Harvey and
    Knott Drum Site, New Castle County, Dela-
    ware).
    PB93-963614/CDH               See 0956
  EPA/520/F-93/008
    Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste  Cleanup
    Efforts Nationwide, Spring 1993 (Fulton Termi-
    nals Site Profile, Oswego County, NY).
    PB93-963616/CDH               See 0955
  EPA/520/F-93/009
    Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste  Cleanup
    Efforts Nationwide, Summer  1993 (Tri-State
    Plating Site Profile, Columbus, Indiana).
    PB93-963615/CDH               See 0970
  EPA/520/F-93/010
    Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Cleanup
    Efforts Nationwide, Summer  1993  (Fike/Artel
    Chemical Site Profile, Nitro, West Virginia).
    PB93-963626/CDH                See 0967
  EPA/520/F-93/011
   Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Cleanup
    Efforts Nationwide, Summer 1993 (Coal Creek
   Site Profile, Chehalis, Washington).
    PB94-963609/CDH                See 0964
  EPA/520/F-93/013
   Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Cleanup
   Efforts  Nationwide,  Summer  1993  (Rogue
   Valley/Ditch  Creek Ranch Site Profile, Wimer,
   Oregon).
   PB93-963629/CDH               See 0969
  EPA/520/F-93/014
   Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Cleanup
   Efforts Nationwide,  Summer  1993 (Common
   Steps in the Removal Process).
	PB93-963631/CPH,     „   ,       See 0965 	
 EPA/520/F-93/015
   Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Cleanup
   Efforts Nationwide, Summer 1993 (Army Creek
   Landfill Site Profile, New Castle, Delaware).
   PB93-963627/CDH               See 0962
 EPA/520/F-93/016
   Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Cleanup
   Efforts Nationwide,  Summer  1993 (Chisman
   Creek Site Profile, York County, Virginia).
   PB94-963607/CDH               See 0963
NU-4

-------
                                                       NUMBER  INDEX
                                                                    EPA/540/2-90/011
EPA/520/F-93/017
  Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Cleanup
  Efforts  Nationwide, Summer  1993 (Northside
  Landfill Site Profile, Spokane, Washington).
  PB94-963611/CDH               See 0968
EPA/520/F-93/018
  Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Cleanup
  Efforts Nationwide, Summer 1993  (Eastern Di-
  versified Metals Site Profile, Sohuylkill County,
  Pennsylvania).
  PB93-963628/CDH               See 0966
EPA/520/F-93/019
  Superfund and Small Waste Contributors.
  PB94-963610/CDH               See 0881
EPA/520/F-94/001
  Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Cleanup
  Efforts  Nationwide, Fall 1993 (Brown  Wood
  Preserving Site Profile, Suwanee County, Flori-
  da).
  PB94-963601/CDH               See 0950
EPA/520/F-94/002
  Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Cleanup
  Efforts  Nationwide, Fall 1993  (Johns-Manville
  Site Profile, Illinois).
  PB94-963602/CDH               See 0952
EPA/520/F-94/003
  Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Cleanup
  Efforts  Nationwide, Fall 1993 (Big D Camp-
  ground Site Profile, Ashtabula County,  Kings-
  ville, Ohio).
  PB94-963608/CDH               See 0949
EPA/520/F-94/004
  Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Cleanup
  Efforts Nationwide, Fall 1993  (Bunker Hill Site
  Profile, Silver Valley, Northern Idaho).
  PB94-963604/CDH               See 0951
EPA/520/F-94/005
  Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Cleanup
  Efforts Nationwide, Winter 1994 (Seymour Re-
  cycling Site Profile, Seymour, Indiana).
  PB94-963612/CDH               See 0975
EPA/520/F-94/006
  Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Cleanup
  Efforts Nationwide, Winter 1994 (Bailey Waste
  Disposal Site Profile, Texas).
  PB94-963613/CDH               See 0973
EPA/520/F-94/007
  Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Cleanup
  Efforts Nationwide, Winter 1994 (New Brighton
  Site Profile,  Minneapolis/St. Paul,  Minnesota).
  PB94-963615/CDH               See 0974
EPA/520/R-93/001
  Report to Congress: Settlements  with Munici-
  pal Waste Generators  and Transporters Since
  1991 under the Comprehensive Environmental
  Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of
  1980.
  PB93-963604/CDH               See 0596
EPA/530/R-92/014M
  Inside the Hotline: A Compilation of 1992
  Monthly Hotline Reports.
  PB93-159572/CDH               See 0141
EPA/530/R-93/012
  Technical Resource Document: Solidification/
  Stabilization and Its Application to Waste Ma-
  terials.
  PB93-237535/CDH               See 1565
EPA/530/R-93/014
  Guidance for  Capacity  Assurance  Planning.
  Capacity Planning Pursuant to CERCLA Sec-
  tion 104(c)(9).
  PB93-209898/CDH               See 0137
EPA/530/SW-90/076
  Mobile Incineration: An Analysis of the  Indus-
  try.
  PB90-255449/CDH               See 1480
EPA/530/SW-91/065A
  Mining Sites on the  National Priorities List
  NPL Site Summary Reports. Volume 1 (Alumi-
  num Company of America (Vancouver Smelter)
  to Cleveland Mill).
  PB92-124767/CDH               See 0350
EPA/530/SW-91/065B
  Mining Sites on the  National Priorities List
  NPL Site Summary Reports. Volume  2  (Com-
  mencement Bay Nearshore/Tideflats to Kerr
  McGee)  (Kress  Creek, Reed-Keppler  Park,
  Residential Areas,  Sewage Treatment  Plant).
  PB92-124775/CDH               See 0351
EPA/530/SW-91/065C
  Mining Sites on the  National Priorities List:
  NPL Site Summary Reports. Volume 3 (Kerr-
  McGee Chemical Corp. (Soda Springs Plant) to
  Ormet Corp).
  PB92-124783/CDH               See 0352
EPA/530/SW-91/065D
  Mining Sites on the  National Priorities List:
  NPL Site Summary Reports. Volume  4  (Oron-
  ogo-Duenweg Mining Belt to Tar Creek).
  PB92-124791/CDH               See 0353
EPA/530/SW-91/065E
  Mining Sites on the  National Priorities List:
  NPL Site Summary Reports. Volume  5  (Tele-
  dyne Wan  Chang to  Wayne Interim Storage
  Facility/W.R. Grace).
  PB92-124809/CDH               See 0354
EPA/530/SW-91/093N
  Inside the  Hotline: A Compilation  of  1991
  Monthly Hotline Reports.
  PB92-131390/CDH               See 0140
EPA/530/SW-91/094
  Index to the Monthly Hotline Report Questions
  (June 1982 to December 1991).
  PB92-131374/CDH               See 0139
EPA/540/1-89/001
  Risk  Assessment  Guidance for  Superfund.
  Volume 2.  Environmental Evaluation  Manual.
  PB90-155599/CDH               See 1072
EPA/540/1-89/002
  Risk  Assessment  Guidance for  Superfund.
  Volume 1.  Human  Health Evaluation Manual.
  Part A.
  PB90-155581/CDH               See 1065
EPA/540/1-89/003
  OSWER  Comparative  Risk Project. Executive
  Summary and Overview.
  PB90-272501/CDH               See 1062
EPA/540/2-87/001
  Handbook:  Responding to Discharges of Sink-
  ing Hazardous Substances.
  PB91-228346/CDH               See 1589
EPA/540/2-88/003
  Assessment of International Technologies for
  Superfund  Applications: Technology Review
  and Trip Report Results.
  PB90-106428/CDH               See 1197
EPA/540/2-89/054B
  Evaluation of Ground-Water Extraction Reme-
  dies. Volume 2. Case Studies 1-19.
  PB90-274440/CDH               See 1446
EPA/540/2-89/054C
  Evaluation of Ground-Water Extraction Reme-
  dies. Volume 3. General Site Data: Data Base
  Reports.
  PB90-274457/CDH               See 1447
EPA/540/2-89/055
  Forum on Innovative Hazardous Waste Treat-
  ment Technologies:  Domestic and Internation-
  al. Held in Atlanta, Georgia on June 19-21,
  1989. Abstract Proceedings.
  PB90-268509/CDH               See 1252
EPA/540/2-89/056
  Forum on Innovative Hazardous Waste Treat-
  ment Technologies:  Domestic and Internation-
  al. Held in Atlanta, Georgia on June 19-21,
  1989. Technical Papers.
  PB90-183799/CDH               See 1253
EPA/540/2-89/057
  Determining  Soil   Response  Action  Levels
  Based on Potential  Contaminant Migration to
  Ground Water: A Compendium of Examples.
  PB90-183575/CDH               See 1497
EPA/540/2-89/058
  Guide  for  Conducting  Treatability  Studies
  under CERCLA.
  PB90-249772/CDH               See 1154
EPA/540/2-90/001
  Assessment of Technologies for the Remedi-
  ation of Radioactively Contaminated Superfund
  Sites.
  PB90-204140/CDH               See 1198
EPA/540/2-90/003A
  Inventory   of  Treatability  Study  Vendors.
  Volume 1.
  PB91-228395/CDH               See 1171
EPA/540/2-90/004
  Bioremediation in the Field: Number 1, Novem-
  ber 1990.
  PB93-206340/CDH               See 1424
EPA/540/2-90/005A
  Environmental Asbestos  Assessment Manual.
  Superfund Method for the Determination of As-
  bestos in Ambient Air. Part 1. Method.
  PB90-274283/CDH               See 1027
EPA/540/2-90/005B
  Environmental Asbestos  Assessment Manual.
  Superfund Method for the Determination of As-
  bestos in Ambient Air. Part 2. Technical Back-
  ground Document.
  PB90-274291/CDH               See 1028
EPA/540/2-90/006
  Innovative  Operational  Treatment  Technol-
  ogies for Application to  Superfund Site:  Nine
  Case Studies.
  PB90-202656/CDH               See 1269
EPA/540/2-90/007
  CERCLA Site Discharges to POTWS Treatabil-
  ity Manual.
  PB91-921269/CDH               See 1577
EPA/540/2-90/008
  CERCLA Site Discharges to  POTWS CERCLA
  Site Sampling Program: Detailed Data  Report.
  PB91-921270/CDH               See 1575
EPA/540/2-90/009
  Abstract Proceedings: Forum on  Innovative
  Hazardous  Waste  Treatment  Technologies;
  Domestic  and International  (2nd). Held  in
  Philadelphia,   Pennsylvania  on  May  15-17,
  1990.
  PB91-145649/CDH               See 1186
EPA/540/2-90/011
  Subsurface Contamination Reference Guide.
  PB91-921292/CDH               See 1474
                                                                                                                             NU-5

-------
EPA/540/2-90/012
           NUMBER INDEX
EPA754d/2-90/bl2
  International  Evaluation  of  In-situ Biorestora-
  «on of Contaminated Soiland Groundwater
  (September 1990)-TransiaUon.
  PB93-207553/COH                See 1517
EPA/540/2-90/013
  Sotvont Extraction Treatment
  PB91-228015/CDH                See 1306
EPA/540/2-90/014
  Mobite/Transportable Incineration Treatment
  PB91-228023/COH                See 1481
EPA/540/2-90/015
  Chemical  Dehalogenatlon Treatment:  APEG
  Treatment.
  PB91-228031/CDH                See 1210
EPAV540/2-90/016
  Slurry Biodegradation.
  PS91-228049/CDH                See 1428
EPA7540/2-96/017
  Sol Washing Treatment.
  PB91-228056/CDH                See 1532
EPA/540/2-90/018       1,1
  Gokla to Pump and Treat Groundwater Reme-
  diation Technology,
  PB91-921356/COH                See 1462
EPA/S40/2-91/001
  Irijjovatlva  , Treatment   technologies:  Semi-
  Ajjrjual Status  Report,  January 1991. First
  Issua.
  P&91.921290/CDH                See 1274
  IfiSbvalva  Treatment   Technologies:  Semi-
  Annua) Status Report. (Third Edition).
  PB92-173210/CPH                See 1275
EPA/S46/2-91/002
  Understanding  Bioremedfation:  A  Guidebook
  for Citizens,
  PB93.20587p/O>i                See 0507
EP/K40/2-91/004',, "''   .'!"'           "   |  '
  Suportund  Engineering Issue: Issues Affecting
  tha Applicability and Success of Remedial/Re-
  moval Incineration Projects.
  PB92-109081/CDH                See 1308
EPA/540/2-91/005
  In itu Steam Extraction Treatment
  PB91-228064/CDH                See 1512
EPA/540/2-91/006
  In situ Son  Vapor Extraction Treatment.
  PB91-228072/COH                See 1511
EPA7540/2-9i/008
  Thormal Dssorptlon Treatment
  PB91-228060/CDH                See 1357
EPA|540/2-91/(H)9'  ",   " ~
  Supwfund  Engineering  Issue:  Treatment of
  Lead-Contaminated Soils.
  PB91-921291/CDH                See 1535
EPA/5"4Q/2-91/p10	"'   '"™  ,'        ,„'   ,',
  Survey of  Materials-Handling   Technologies
  Usc-d at Hazardous Waste Sites.
  P|il-92i203/CbHiii	~m   "     See 1323
EPA/540/2-91/011
   llniki  , f      ",   ,'ivi: .   'lii'Liin!'   '      ,  ',
  Vgpdor Information Form to be Completed for
  Participation in the: Vendor Information System
  fo?	 Innovative "  Treatment	Technologies
  (vTstrf).
  PS91-921289/CDH                See 1369
EPA/540/2-91/013A
  GukJa  for  Conducting  Treatability  Studies
  under  CERCLA:   Aerobic   Biodegradation
  Remedy Screening. Interim Guidance.
  PB92.109065/CDH                See 1157
EPA/540/2-91/013B
  Guide  for  Conducting  Treatability  Studies
  under  CERCLA:   Aerobic   Biodegradation
  Remedy Screening.
  PB92-109073/CDH                See 1156
  Guide  for  Conducting  Treatability  Studies
  under  CERCLA:   Aerobic   Biodegradation
  Remedy  Screening.  Quick  Reference  Fact
  Sheet.
  PB92-224377/CDH                See 1158
EPA/540/2-91/015
  Forum on Innovative Hazardous Waste Treat-
  ment Technologies (3rd): Domestic  and  Inter-
  national. Held in Dallas, Texas on June 11-13,
  1991. Technical Papers.
  PB92-219732/CDH                See 1254
EPA/540/2-91/018
  Bioremediation  in  the  Field.  An Information
  Update on  Applying Bioremediation  to  Site
  Clean-Up. Number 3.
  PB92-224807/CDH                See 1422
EPA/540/2-91/019A
  Guide  for  Conducting  Treatability  Studies
  under CERCLA:  Soil Vapor Extraction. Interim
  Guidance.
  PB92-227271/CDH                See 1163
EPA/540/2-91/019B
  Guide  for  Conducting  Treatability  Studies
  under CERCLA:  Soil Vapor Extraction. Quick
  Reference Fact Sheet.
  PB92-224401/CDH                See 1164
EPA/540/2-91/020A
  Guide  for  Conducting  Treatability  Studies
  under CERCLA:  Soil Washing.  Interim  Guid-
  ance.
  PB92-170570/CDH                See 1165
EPA/540/2-91/020B
  Guide  for  Conducting  Treatability  Studies
  under CERCLA:  Soil Washing:  Quick  Refer-
  ence Fact Sheet.
  PB92-170588/CDH                See 1166
EPA/540/2-91/021
  in situ Soil Flushing. Engineering Bulletin.
  PB92-180025/CDH                See 1510
EPA/540/2-91/022
  Air Stripping of Aqueous Solutions. Engineering
  Bulletin.
  PB92-180Q33/CDH                See 1371
EPA/540/2-91/p23
  Control of Air Emissions from Materials Han-
  dling during  Remediation. Engineering Bulletin.
  PB92-180041/CDH                See 1398
EPA/540/2-91/024
  Granular Activated Carbon  Treatment.  Engi-
  neering Bulletin.
  PB92-180058/CDH                See 1258
EPA/540/2-91/025
  Chemical  Oxidation  Treatment  Engineering
  Bulletin.
  PB92-180066/CDH                See 1211
EPA/540/2-91/027
  Bioremediation  in  the  Field:  An Information
  Update on  Applying Bioremediation  to  Site
  Cleanup. (Number 4).
  PB92-224708/CDH                See 1423
EPA/540/4-89/001
  Ground Water Sampling for Metals  Analyses.
  Superfund Ground Water Issue.
  PB91-133249/CDH                See 1459
EPA/540/4-89/002
  Superfund Ground  Water Issue: Accuracy of
  Depth to Water  Measurements. 2nd in Series
  of Issue Papers.
  PB90-149840/CDH                See 1476
EPA/540/4-89/003
  Facilitated  Transport. Series  of Issue Papers
  (3rd).
  PB91-133256/CDH                See 1451
EPA/540/4-89/004
  Superfund  Ground Water Issue. Contaminant
  Transport in Fractured Media: Models for Deci-
  sion Makers.
  PB90-268517/CDH                See 1477
EPA/540/4-89/005
  Performance Evaluations of Pump-and-Treat
  Remediations.
  PB92-114461/CDH                See 1471
EPA/540/4-90/002
  National Priorities List Sites: Alabama.
  PB91-921209/CDH                See 0148
EPA/540/4-90/003
  National Priorities List Sites: Alaska.
  PB91-921210/CDH                See 0151
EPA/540/4-90/004
  National Priorities  List  Sites: Arizona  and
  Nevada.
  PB91-921211/CDH                See 0156
EPA/540/4-90/005
  National Priorities List Sites: Arkansas.
  PB91 -921212/CDH                See 0159
EPA/540/4-90/006
  National Priorities List Sites: California.
  PB91-921213/CDH                See 0162
EPA/540/4-90/007
  National Priorities List Sites: Colorado.
  PB91-921214/CDH                See 0165
EPA/540/4-90/008
  National Priorities List Sites: Connecticut.
  PB91 -921215/CDH                See 0168
EPA/540/4-90/009
  National Priorities List Sites: Delaware.
  PB91-921216/CDH                See 0171
EPA/540/4-90/010
  National Priorities List Sites: Florida.
  PB91-921217/CDH                See 0174
EPA/540/4-90/011
  National Priorities List Sites: Georgia.
  PB91 -921218/CDH                See 0177
EPA/540/4-90/012
  National Priorities List Sites: Hawaii.
  PB91-921219/CDH                See 0180
EPA/540/4-90/013
  National Priorities List Sites: Idaho.
  PB91-921220/CDH                See 0181
EPA/540/4-90/014
  National Priorities List Sites: Illinois.
  PB91-921221/CDH                See 0184
EPA/540/4-90/015
  National Priorities List Sites: Indiana.
  PB91-921222/CDH                See 0187
EPA/540/4-90/016
  National Priorities List Sites: Iowa.
  PB91-921223/CPH                See 0190
EPA/540/4-90/017
  National Priorities List Sites: Kansas.
  PB91 -921224/CDH                See 0193
EPA/540/4-90/018
  National Priorities List Sites: Kentucky.
  PB91-921225/CDH                See 0196
EPA/540/4-90/019
  National Priorities List Sites: Louisiana.
  PB91 -921226/CDH                See 0199
NU-6

-------
                                                        NUMBER  INDEX
                                                                   EPA/540/5-91/003B
EPA/540/4-90/020
  National Priorities List Sites: Maine.
  PB91 -921227/CDH                See 0202
EPA/540/4-90/021
  National Priorities List Sites: Maryland.
  PB91 -921228/CDH                See 0205
EPA/540/4-90/022
  National Priorities List Sites: Massachusetts.
  PB91-921229/CDH                See 0208
EPA/540/4-90/023
  National Priorities List Sites: Michigan.
  PB91-921230/CDH                See 0211
EPA/540/4-90/024
  National Priorities List Sites: Minnesota.
  PB91-921231/CDH                See 0214
EPA/540/4-90/025
  National Priorities List Sites: Mississippi.
  PB91-921232/CDH                See 0217
EPA/540/4-90/026
  National Priorities List Sites: Missouri.
  PB91-921233/CDH                See 0220
EPA/540/4-90/027
  National Priorities List Sites: Montana.
  PB91-921234/CDH                See 0223
EPA/540/4-90/028
  National Priorities List Sites: Nebraska.
  PB91-921236/CDH                See 0226
EPA/540/4-90/029
  National Priorities List Sites:  New Hampshire.
  PB91-921237/CDH                See 0229
EPA/540/4-90/030
  National Priorities List Sites: New Jersey.
  PB91-921235/CDH                See 0232
EPA/540/4-90/031
  National Priorities List Sites: New Mexico.
  PB91-921238/CDH                See 0235
EPA/540/4-90/032
  National Priorities List Sites: New York.
  PB91-921239/CDH                See 0238
EPA/540/4-90/033
  National Priorities List  Sites:  North Carolina.
  PB91-921240/CDH                See 0243
EPA/540/4-90/034
  National Priorities List Sites: North and South
  Dakota.
  PB91-921241/CDH                See 0241
EPA/540/4-90/035
  National Priorities List Sites: Ohio.
  PB91-921242/CDH                See 0247
EPA/540/4-90/036
  National Priorities List Sites: Oklahoma.
  PB91-921243/CDH                See 0250
EPA/540/4-90/037
  National Priorities List Sites: Oregon.
  PB91-921244/CDH                See 0253
EPA/540/4-90/038
  National Priorities List Sites: Pennsylvania.
  PB91-921245/CDH                See 0256
EPA/540/4-90/039
  National Priorities List Sites: Rhode Island.
  PB91-921246/CDH                See 0262
EPA/540/4-90/040
  National Priorities List  Sites:  South Carolina.
  PB91-921247/CDH                See 0266
EPA/540/4-90/042
  National Priorities List Sites: Tennessee.
  PB91-921248/CDH                See 0269
EPA/540/4-90/043
  National Priorities List Sites: Texas.
  PB91-921249/CDH                See 0272
EPA/540/4-90/044
  National Priorities List Sites: Utah.
  PB91-921250/CDH                See 0276
EPA/540/4-90/045
  National Priorities List Sites: Vermont.
  PB91-921251/CDH                See 0279
EPA/540/4-90/046
  National Priorities List Sites: Virginia.
  PB91-921252/CDH                See 0282
EPA/540/4-90/047
  National Priorities List Sites: Washington.
  PB91-921253/CDH                See 0285
EPA/540/4-90/048
  National Priorities List Sites: West Virginia.
  PB91 -921254/CDH                See 0288
EPA/540/4-90/049
  National Priorities List Sites: Wisconsin.
  PB91-921255/CDH                See 0291
EPA/540/4-90/050
  National Priorities List Sites: Wyoming.
  PB91 -921256/CDH                See 0294
EPA/540/4-90/051
  National Priorities List Sites: Puerto Rico.
  PB91-921257/CDH                See 0259
EPA/540/4-90/052
  National Priorities List Sites: American Samoa,
  Guam and Trust Territories.
  PB91-921258/CDH                See 0155
EPA/540/4-90/053
  Basic  Concepts of Contaminant Sorption at
  Hazardous Waste Sites (Ground Water  Issue).
  PB91-191007/CDH                See 1431
EPA/540/4-90/054
  Reductive Dehalogenation of Organic Contami-
  nants  in Soils  and  Ground  Water. Ground
  Water Issue.
  PB91-191056/CDH                See 1527
EPA-540/4-91/001
  Ground-Water Issue: Soil  sampling and analy-
  sis for volatile organic compounds.
  DE91016758/CDH                 See 1507
EPA/540/4-91/003
  Ground-Water Issue: Characterizing Soils  for
  Hazardous Waste Site Assessments.
  PB91-921294/CDH                See 1455
EPA/540/4-91/005
  Ground-Water  Issue:  The Effects  of Well
  Casing Material on Ground Water-Quality.
  PB92-224724/CDH                See 1457
EPA/540/5-89/001A
  Technology Evaluation  Report SITE Program
  Demonstration  Test, HAZCON  Solidification,
  Douglassville, Pennsylvania. Volume 1.
  PB89-158810/CDH                See 1569
EPA/540/5-89/004C
  Technology  Evaluation Report:  International
  Waste Technologies/Geo-Con In situ Stabiliza-
  tion/Solidification. Volume 3.  Update Report.
  PB90-269069/CDH                See 1567
EPA/540/5-89/004D
  Technology  Evaluation Report:  International
  Waste Technologies/Geo-Con In situ Stabiliza-
  tion/Solidification. Volume 4.  Update Report.
  PB90-269077/CDH                See 1568
EPA/540/5-89/005A
  Technology Evaluation  Report: SITE Program
  Demonstration Test, Soliditech, Inc., Solidifica-
  tion/Stabilization Process.  Volume 1.
  PB90-191750/CDH                See 1570
EPA/540/5-89/005B
  Technology Evaluation  Report: SITE Program
  Demonstration Test, Soliditech, Inc. Solidifica-
  tion/Stabilization Process. Volume 2.
  PB90-191768/CDH                See 1571
EPA/540/5-89/011 A
  Technology Evaluation  Report: Chemfix Tech-
  nologies,  Inc. Solidification/Stabilization  Proc-
  ess, Clackamas, Oregon. Volume 1.
  PB91-127696/CDH                See 1566
EPA/540/5-89/011B
  Technology Evaluation Report CHEMFIX Tech-
  nologies,  Inc., Solidification/Stabilization  Proc-
  ess, Clackamas, Oregon. Volume 2.
  PB90-274127/CDH                See 1339
EPA/540/5-89/012
  Technology Evaluation  Report: SITE Program
  Demonstration of the Ultrox International  Ultra-
  violet Radiation/Oxidation Technology.
  PB90-198177/CDH                See 1351
EPA/540/5-89/013
  Superfund Innovative Technology Evaluation
  Program:   Technology   Profiles,  November
  1989.
  PB90-249756/CDH                See 1317
EPA/540/5-90/001
  Superfund Innovative Technology Evaluation
  Program:   Progress  and Accomplishments,
  Fiscal Year 1989. A Third Report to Congress.
  PB90-216516/CDH                See 1311
EPA/540/5-90/002
  Technology Evaluation  Report: SITE  Program.
  CF Systems Organics Extraction System, New
  Bedford, Massachusetts. Volume 1.
  PB90-186495/CDH                See 1346
  Technology Evaluation  Report SITE  Program.
  CF Systems Organics Extraction System, New
  Bedford, Massachusetts. Volume 2.
  PB90-186503/CDH                See 1347
EPA/540/5-90/004
  Development of Electro-Acoustic  Soil Decon-
  tamination (ESD) Process for In situ Applica-
  tions.
  PB90-204728/CDH                See 1498
EPA/540/5-90/005A
  Emerging  Technologies:   Bio-Recovery  Sys-
  tems Removal and Recovery of  Metal Ions
  from Groundwater.
  PB90-252594/CDH                See 1439
EPA/540/5-90/005B
  Emerging  Technologies:   Bio-Recovery  Sys-
  tems Removal and Recovery of  Metal Ions
  from Groundwater. Appendices.
  PB90-252602/CDH                See 1440
EPA/540/5-90/007
  Technology Evaluation  Report SITE Program
  Demonstration of the DuPont/Oberlin Microfil-
  tration Technology.
  PB92-153410/CDH                See 1350
EPA/540/5-91/003A
  Technology  Evaluation  Report:  Biotrol  Soil
  Washing System for Treatment of a Wood Pre-
  serving Site. Volume 1.
  PB92-115310/CDH                See 1539
EPA/540/5-91 /003B
  Technology  Evaluation  Report:  Biotrol  Soil
  Washing System for Treatment of a Wood Pre-
  serving Site. Volume 2, Part A.
  PB92-115328/CDH                See 1540
                                                                                                                              NU-7

-------
• Jif! !
                        t!l!!h
...... 5'f '"' ;1
          ' R! W
EPA/540/5-91/003C
                                                     NUMBER INDEX
EPA/540/S-91/003C
  Technology evaluation  Report  Bfotrol  Soil
  Washing System for Treatment of a Wood Pre-
  serving Site. Volume 2, Part B.
  P892-115336/CDH                See 1541
  SupWfund innovative Technology Evaluation
  Program:  Progress  and  Accomplishments,
  Fiscal Year 1990. A Fourth Report to Con-
  P8B2.224799/CDH                See 1312
EPA7S46/S-91/6u5 .............................. ......
  Technology Evaluation  Report SITE Program
  Demonstration Test Horsehead Resource De-
  velopment  Company,  Inc.,  Rame  Reactor
  Technology, Monaca, Pennsylvania.
  PB92-205855/CDH                See 1353
EPA/S40/5-91/007A
  Technology Evaluation Report of Retech, Inc.,
  Plasma Centrifugal Furnace. Volume 1.
  PB92-216035/CDH                See 1340
  Tichnotogy Evaluation  Report of Retech's
  Pfeiima Centrifugal Furnace. Volume 1.
  PS93-115160/COH                See 1342
EPA/S40/5-91/007B
  Technology Evaluation Report of Retech, Inc.,
  Plasma Centrifugal Furnace. Volume 2.
  P892-216043/CDH                See 1341
  Technology Evaluation  Report of Retech's
  Plasma Centrifugal Furnace. Volume 2.
  P893-1 1 51 78/CDH                See 1343
EPA/iw/5-91/Op8 ~:   "|T^  "  ,       ' '
  Supwfund Innovative Technology Evaluation
  Program:  Technology Profiles, Fourth  Edition.
  P|a2-224294/CDH  '. ......................     See 1316
EPA/540/5-91/009 ...........................................
  Technology  Evaluation  Report  Pilot-Scale
  Demonstration of a gurry-Phase Biological Re-
  acfjx for Crepspta-Qgntamlnated Soil. Volume

  PB93-205532/CDH                See 1542
EPA/540/8-89/005 M  , £ ..... ..........
  Soporfund Emergency  Response  Actions: A
  Summary  of  Federally  Funded  Removals.
  Vofems 3.
  Pf|6>2143S4/CDH                See 0318
EPA/640/8-89/006
  ROD Annual Report, FY 1989.
  PB90-258484/CDH                See 1111
EPA'7140/8-89/009
  MarMebmont R'evJew "of the Superfund Pro-
  gram: implementation Plan.
  P890-153883/CDH                See 0102
EPA/540/8-89/U11
  Anafysis of State  Superfund Programs: 50-
  Stata Study.
  P880-272733/CDH                See 0447
EPA/540/8-89/012
  Usw's Guide to  Contract Laboratory Program.
  PB90.186396/CDH                See 0078
EPA/S40/8-90/004
  Pfogross  Toward  Implementing  Superfund.
  Fiscal Year 1988.
  P890-249442/CDH                See 0299
EPA/540/8-90/005
  Status of State Involvement in the Superfund
  Program. FY 80 to FY 89.
  PB90-272725/CDH                See 0114
                    ""    ™
                   ...... ......... ,
  Technology  Transfer  Needs  Assessment,
  1090,  "'
  PS9Ii-125674/CDH                See 1354

NU-8
                                          EPA/540/8-90/009
                                            SUPERFUND:  Focusing  on  the  Nation  at
                                            Large. A Decade of Progress at National Prior-
                                            ities List Sites.
                                            PB91-921202/CDH                See 0321
                                            Superfund: Focusing on the Nation at Large. A
                                            Decade of Progress at National Priorities List
                                            Sites.
                                            PB91-921207/CDH                See 0322
                                          EPA/540/8-90/011
                                            Technical Support Services for Superfund Site
                                            Remediation. Second Edition.
                                            PB91-921285/CDH                See 1335
                                          EPA/540/8-90/014
                                            Superfund Emergency  Response Actions: A
                                            Summary  of Federally  Funded  Removals.
                                            Fourth Annual Report - Fiscal Year 1989.
                                            PB91-921260/CDH                See 0314
                                          EPA/540/8-90/017
                                            Progress  Toward  Implementing  Superfund.
                                            Fiscal Year 1989.
                                            PB91-921204/CDH                See 0300
                                          EPA/540/8-90/101
                                            Superfund: Environmental Progress.
                                            PB93-206209/CDH                See 0976
                                          EPA/540/8-91/002
                                            Analysis  of  State  Superfund Programs:  50-
                                            State Study, 1990 Update.
                                            PB91-921259/CDH                See 0448
                                          EPA/540/8-91/003
                                           .Superfund Program: Ten  Years of Progress.
                                            PB91-921286/CDH                See 0977
                                          EPA/540/8-91/004
                                            Progress  Toward  Implementing  Superfund,
                                            Fiscal Year 1990: A Report to the Congress.
                                            PB92-963256/CDH                See 0301
                                          EPA/540/8-91/007
                                            Bibliography  of Federal Reports and Publica-
                                            tions  Describing Alternative  and  Innovative
                                            Treatment Technologies for Corrective  Action
                                            and Site Remediation.
                                            PB91-921293/CDH                See 1206
                                          EPA/540/8-91/008
                                            Accessing Federal Data Bases for Contaminat-
                                            ed Site Clean-Up Technologies.
                                            PB91-921288/CDH                See 1188
                                          EPA/540/8-91/016
                                            Superfund: Focusing  on the  Nation at  Large.
                                            1991 Update.
                                            PB92-963252/CDH                See 0323
                                          EPA/540/8-91/017
                                            National Priorities List Sites: Alabama.
                                            PB92-963223/CDH                See 0149
                                          EPA/540/8-91/018
                                            National Priorities List Sites: Alaska.
                                            PB92-963251/CDH                See 0152
                                          EPA/540/8-91/019
                                            National  Priorities  List Sites:  Arizona and
                                            Nevada.
                                            PB92-963216/CDH                See 0157
                                          EPA/540/8-91/020
                                            National Priorities List Sites: Arkansas.
                                            PB92-963220/CDH                See 0160
                                          EPA/540/8-91/021
                                            National  Priorities  List Sites: California and
                                            Hawaii.
                                            PB92-963239/CDH                See 0163
                                          EPA/54b/8-91/022
                                            National Priorities List Sites: Colorado.
                                            PB92-963237/CDH                See 0166
EPA/540/8-91/023
  National Priorities List Sites: Connecticut.
  PB92-963203                    See 0169
EPA/540/8-91/024
  National Priorities List Sites: Delaware.
  PB92-963228/CDH               See 0172
EPA/540/8-91/025
  National Priorities List Sites: Florida.
  PB92-963250/CDH               See 0175
EPA/540/8-91/026
  National Priorities List Sites: Georgia.
  PB92-963226/CDH               See 0178
EPA/540/8-91/027
  National Priorities List Sites: Idaho.
  PB92-963219/CDH               See 0182
EPA/540/8-91/028
  National Priorities List Sites: Illinois.
  PB92-963248/CDH               See 0185
EPA/540/8-91/029
  National Priorities List Sites: Indiana.
  PB92-963249/CDH               See 0188
EPA/540/8-91/030
  National Priorities List Sites: Iowa.
  PB92-963234/CDH               See 0191
EPA/540/8-91/031
  National Priorities List Sites: Kansas.
  PB92-963213/CDH               See 0194
EPA/540/8-91/032
  National Priorities List Sites: Kentucky.
  PB92-963227/CDH               See 0197
EPA/540/8-91/033
  National Priorities List Sites: Louisiana.
  PB92-963222/CDH               See 0200
EPA/540/8-91/034
  National Priorities List Sites: Maine.
  PB92-963204/CDH               See 0203
EPA/540/8-91/035
  National Priorities List Sites: Maryland.
  PB92-963218/CDH               See 0206
EPA/540/8-91/036
  National Priorities List Sites: Massachusetts.
  PB92-963206/CDH               See 0209
EPA/540/8-91/037
  National Priorities List Sites: Michigan.
  PB92-963247/CDH               See 0212
EPA/540/8-91/038
  National Priorities List Sites: Minnesota.
  PB92-963211 /CDH               See 0215
EPA/540/8-91/039
  National Priorities List Sites: Mississippi.
  PB92-963224/CDH               See 0218
EPA/540/8-91/040
  National Priorities List Sites: Missouri.
  PB92-963214/CDH               See 0221
EPA/540/8-91/041
  National Priorities List Sites: Montana.
  PB92-963235/CDH               See 0224
EPA/540/8-91/042
  National Priorities List Sites: Nebraska.
  PB92-963233/CDH               See 0227
EPA/540/8-91/043
  National Priorities List Sites: New Hampshire.
  PB92-963205/CDH               See 0230
EPA/54b/8-9;i>d44
  National Priorities List Sites: New Jersey.
  PB92-963241/CDH               See 0233
                   Ml-

                  •it

-------
                                                         NUMBER INDEX
                                                                                                                EPA/540/A5-91/001
 EPA/540/8-91/045
   National Priorities List Sites: New Mexico.
   PB92-963232/CDH                See 0236
 EPA/540/8-91/046
   National Priorities List Sites: New York.
   PB92-963208/CDH                See 0239
 EPA/540/8-91/047
   National Priorities List Sites: North Carolina.
   PB92-963209/CDH                See 0244
 EPA/540/8-91/048
   National Priorities List Sites: North Dakota and
   South Dakota.
   PB92-963236/CDH                See 0246
 EPA/540/8-91/049
   National Priorities List Sites: Ohio.
   PB92-963246/CDH                See 0248
 EPA/540/8-91/050
   National Priorities List Sites: Oklahoma.
   PB92-963221/CDH                See 0251
 EPA/540/8-91/051
   National Priorities List Sites: Oregon.
   PB92-963245/CDH                See 0254
 EPA/540/8-91/052
   National Priorities List Sites: Pennsylvania.
   PB92-963240/GDH                See 0257
 EPA/540/8-91/053
   National Priorities List Sites: Rhode Island.
   PB92-963230/CDH                See 0263
 EPA/540/8-91/054
   National Priorities  List Sites:  South Carolina.
   PB92-963210/CDH                See 0267
 EPA/540/8-91/055
   National Priorities List Sites: Tennessee.
   PB92-963225/CDH                See 0270
 EPA/540/8-91/056
   National Priorities List Sites: Texas.
   PB92-963212/CDH                See 0273
 EPA/540/8-91/057
   National Priorities List Sites: Utah.
   PB92-963215/CDH                See 0277
 EPA/540/8-91/058
   National Priorities List Sites: Vermont.
   PB92-963231/CDH                See 0280
 EPA/540/8-91/059
   National Priorities List Sites: Virginia.
   PB92-963217/CDH                See 0283
 EPA/540/8-91/060
   National Priorities List Sites: Washington.
   PB92-963244/CDH                See 0286
 EPA/540/8-91/061
   National Priorities List Sites: West Virginia.
   PB92-963229/CDH                See 0289
 EPA/540/8-91/062
  National Priorities List Sites: Wisconsin.
  PB92-963243/CDH                See 0292
 EPA/540/8-91/063
  National Priorities List Sites: Wyoming.
  PB92-963238/CDH                See 0295
EPA/540/8-91/064
  National Priorities List Sites: American Samoa,
  Guam, and the Trust Territories.
  PB92-963242/CDH                See 0154
EPA/540/8-91/065
  National Priorities List Sites: Puerto Rico.
  PB92-963207/CDH                See 0260
EPA/540/8-91/069
  NPL Characterization  Project: National Results.
  PB92-963304/CDH                See 0355
 EPA-540/8-91/070
   NPL  Characterization  Project: Region 1  Re-
   sults.
   PB92-963305/CDH                See 0356
 EPA/540/8-91/072
   NPL  Characterization  Project: Region 3  Re-
   sults.
   PB92-963307/CDH                See 0357
 EPA/540/8-91/073
   NPL  Characterization  Project: Region 4  Re-
   sults.
   PB92-963308/CDH                See 0358
 EPA/540/8-91/074
   NPL  Characterization  Project: Region 5  Re-
   sults.
   PB92-963309/CDH                See 0359
 EPA/540/8-91/075
   NPL  Characterization  Project: Region 6  Re-
   sults.
   PB92-963310/CDH                See 0360
 EPA/540/8-91/076
   NPL  Characterization  Project: Region 7  Re-
   sults.
   PB92-963311 /CDH                See 0361
 EPA/540/8-91/077
   NPL  Characterization  Project: Region 8  Re-
   sults.
   PB92-963312/CDH                See 0362
 EPA/540/8-91/078
   NPL  Characterization  Project: Region 9  Re-
   sults.
   PB92-963313/CDH                See 0363
 EPA/540/8-91/079
   NPL Characterization Project: Region 10  Re-
   sults.
   PB92-963314/CDH               See 0364
 EPA/540/8-91/080
   CERCLIS  Characterization  Project:   National
   Results.
   PB92-963315/CDH               See 0001
 EPA/540/8-91/081
   CERCLIS Characterization Project: Region 1
   Results.
   PB92-963316/CDH               See 0002
 EPA/540/8-91/082
   CERCLIS Characterization Project: Region 2
   Results.
   PB92-963317/CDH               See 0003
 EPA/540/8-91/083
   CERCLIS Characterization Project: Region 3
   Results.
   PB92-963318/CDH               See 0004
 EPA/540/8-91/084
  CERCLIS Characterization Project: Region 4
  Results.
  PB92-963319/CDH               See 0005
 EPA/540/8-91/085
  CERCLIS Characterization Project: Region 5
  Results.
  PB92-963320/CDH               See 0006
 EPA/540/8-91/086
  CERCLIS Characterization Project: Region 6
  Results.
  PB92-963321/CDH               See 0007
EPA/540/8-91/087
  CERCLIS Characterization Project: Region 7
  Results.
  PB92-963322/CDH               See 0008
EPA/540/8-91/088
  CERCLIS Characterization Project: Region 8
  Results.
  PB92-963323/CDH               See 0009
 EPA/540/8-91/089
   CERCLIS Characterization  Project: Region  9
   Results.
   PB92-963324/CDH               See 0010
 EPA/540/8-91/090
   CERCLIS Characterization Project  Region 10
   Results.
   PB92-963325/CDH               See 0011
 EPA/540/8-91/093
   Superfund  Emergency Response Actions: A
   Summary of Federally-Funded Removals. Fifth
   Annual Report - Fiscal Year 1990.
   PB92-963403/CDH               See 0313
 EPA/540/9-91/001
   OSWER  Source Book: Training and Technolo-
   gy Transfer Resources.
   PB92-102169/CDH               See 1283
 EPA/540/9-91/002
   Innovative Treatment Technologies: Overview
   and Guide to Information Sources.
   PB92-179001/CDH               See 1272
 EPA/540/A5-89/003
   Terra Vac In situ  Vacuum Extraction  System:
   Applications Analysis Report.
   PB90-119744/CDH               See 1355
   Terra Vac In situ  Vacuum Extraction  System:
   Applications Analysis Report.
   PB90-126665/CDH               See 1356
 EPA/540/A5-89/004
   International Waste Technologies/Geo-Con In
   situ   Stabilization/Solidification:   Applications
   Analysis Report.
   PB90-269085/CDH               See 1557
 EPA/540/A5-89/005
   Soliditech, Inc. Solidification/Stabilization Proc-
   ess: Applications Analysis Report.
   PB91-129817/CDH               See 1562
 EPA/540/A5-89/008
  American  Combustion  Pyretron Destruction
  System. Applications Analysis Report.
   PB90-258427/CDH               See 1193
 EPA/540/A5-89/011
  Chemfix Technologies, Inc. Solidification/Stabi-
  lization Process. Application Analysis  Report.
  PB91-187054/CDH               See 1551
 EPA/540/A5-89/012
  Ultrox International Ultraviolet Radiation/Oxida-
  tion Technology: Applications Analysis Report.
  PB91-129759/CDH               See 1364
 EPA/540/A5-90/002
  Applications Analysis  Report: SITE Program,
  CF Systems Organics Extraction System, New
  Bedford, Massachusetts.
  PB91 -113845/CDH                See 1196
EPA/540/A5-90/007
  DuPont/Oberlin Microfiltration Technology. Ap-
  plications Analysis Report.
  PB92-119023/CDH                See 1584
EPA/540/A5-90/008
  Toxic Treatments 'In-situ'  Steam/Hot-Air Strip-
  ping Technology. Applications Analysis Report.
  PB91-181768/CDH                See 1545
EPA/540/A5-91/001
  Biological Treatment of Wood Preserving Site
  Groundwater  by  BioTrol,  Inc.   Applications
  Analysis Report.
  PB91-227983/CDH                See 1433
                                                                                                                             NU-9

-------
                                                        NUMBER INDEX
EPA/540/A5-91/002
  AWD   Technologies  Integrated   AquaDetox
  JTrada Narne)/SVE Technology:  Applications
  i^naiysfe1 Report. ..................................
  |S@92.2i8379/CDH                See 1202
EPA/540/A5-91/qp2
  BtoTrol SoH Washing System for Treatment of
  a Wood Preserving  Site: Applications Analysis
  Report,
  PB92-115245/CbH                See 1492
EPA/540/A5-91/005
  Hofsohoad Resource Development Company,
  Inc. Flame  Reactor Technology:  Applications
  Analysts Report.
  P892-213214/CDH                See 1263
EPA/540/A5-91/007
  Roloch, Inc., Plasma Centrifugal Furnace: Ap-
  pHcattons Analysis Report.
  PB92-218791/CDH                See 1295
EPA/540/A5-91/009
  Pftoi-Scala Domonstration of a Slurry-Phase Bi-
  ological Roactor for  Creosote-Contaminated
  Soil. Applications Analysis Report.
  PB94-i24039/CpH                See 1426
EPA/540/AR-92/602
  Carvor-Groonfield Process  (Trade  Name) De-
  hydro-tech Corporation. Applications Analysis
  P«P°rt.
                        ...... ,  ...     ,8661207
                        '          "'
  lIppKcaUons"Analyis Report Silicate Technol-
  ogy  Corporation's  Solidification/Stabilization
  Technology for  Organic and Inorganic Con-
  taminants in Soils.
  P893-172948/CDH                See 1550
EPA/540/AR-92/01^
  Mombfana Treatment of Wood Preserving Site
  Groundwator by  SBP Technologies,  Inc. Appli-
"  cations Analysis  Report,
                  ........ ., .......  .....   ,,
EPA/540/AR-92/015
  Demonstration  of a Trial  Excavation at the
  McCdl Superfund Site.
  PB93-100121/CDH                See 1226
EPA/540/AR-92/079
  Resources  Conservation Company  B.E.S.T.
  (Trade Name} Solvent Extraction Technology:
  Application Analysis Report.
  P894-105434/CDH                See 1294
E|*A/540/AR-93/506
  CWM PO'WW'ER (Trade Name) Evaporation-
  Catalytic  Oxidation  Technology:  Applications
  Analysis Report.
  PB94-124658/COH                See 1225
EPA/540/AR-93/509
  Aocutoch  Pnoumatte Fracturing Extraction and
  Hot Gas Injection. Phase 1. Applications Analy-
  sis Report.
  {^-117431(00^,  ,.,,.         See 1190
EPA/540/C-93/002
  Hsafth and  Safely  Plan (HASP)  User's Guide
  fVirston 3.6/4.6).
  e893-963414/CDH                See 0917
EPA/540/C-93/003
  field' Certi'flcaUon ..... Tracking  System (FCTS).
  Pier's GuJda, Version 2.1 1"
  P893.96341S/ODH                See 0909
EPA/540/F-93/004
  Raquirod  Contracts  Management Training for
  Regional Superfund Personnel.
  P883-963258/CDH                See 0065
EPA/540/F-93-005
  Extending the Tracking of Analytical Services
  to Potentially  Responsible Party-Lead Super-
  fund  Sites   (Supplemental  Guidance  on
  OSWER Directive 9240.0-2A).
  PB93-963502/CDH               See 0986
EPA/546/F-93/U06
  Reassignment of CLP Transportation  Func-
  tions.
  PB93-963501/CDH               See 0063
EPA/540/F-93-007
  OSWER Integrated Health and Safety Stand-
  ard Operating Practices.
  PB93-963401/CDH               See 0921
EPA/540/F-93/009
  Permits and Permit 'Equivalency' Processes for
  CERCLA On-Site Response Actions.
  PB93-963325/CDH               See 0435
EPA/540/F-93/010
  Use of Time  and Materials and  Cost  Reim-
  bursement Subcontracts for  Remedial Actions
  under the Alternative  Remedial  Contracting
  Strategy Contracts.
  PB93-963282/CDH               See 1141
EPA/540/F-93/011
  Clarification of Delegation  to Approve Consist-
  ency Exemptions at NPL Sites.
  PB93-963281/CDH               See 0336
EPA/540/F-93/012
  Guidance on Program Management Activities
  under ARCS.
  PB93-963280/CDH               See 0026
EPA/540/F-93/013
  Amendment to Historical  Definitions of NPL
  Deletion Start and Completion Dates.
  PB93-963278/CDH               See 0335
EPA/540/F-93/014
  Identification of a Senior Superfund Official for
  Addressing  Special NPL Site-Related  Issues.
  PB93-963279/CDH               See 0348
EPA/540/F-93/015
  Performance Tracking under ARCS Contracts.
  PB93-963276/CDH               See 0061
EPA/540/F-93/016
  Initiatives to Streamline the Alternative Reme-
  dial Contracting  Strategy (ARCS) Contracts'
  Award Fee Process.
  PB93-963275/CDH               See 0033
EPA/540/F-93/017
  Resources for Preparing Independent Govern-
  ment Estimates for Remedial Contracting Work
  Assignments.
  PB93-963267/CDH               See 0066
EPA/540/F-93/019
  NPL Construction  Completion Definition  at
  Bioremediation and Soil Vapor Extraction Sites.
  PB93-963327/CDH               See 0365
EPA/540/F-93/020
  Technology Selection Guide  for Wood Treater
  Sites.
  PB93-963329/CDH               See 1122
EPA/540/F-93/024
  Superfund   Accelerated    Cleanup    Model
  (SACM): Questions and Answers.
  PB93-963286/CDH               See 0121
EPA/540/F-93/029
  Facility Response Plans.
  PB93-963408/CDH               See 0929
EPA/540/F-93/030
  Guidance on Setting  Priorities  for  NPL Candi-
  date Sites.
  PB93-963333/CDH               See 0344
EPA/540/F-93/032
  Questions and Answers on Release  Notifica-
  tion Requirements and Reportable  Quantity
  Adjustments.
  PB93-963411/CDH               See 1149
EPA/540/F-93/033
  Expedited Response Actions.
  PB93-963410/CDH
See 1003
EPA/540/F-93/035
  Presumptive Remedy  for CERCLA  Municipal
  Landfill Sites.
  PB93-963339/CDH
                                 See 1105
EPA/540/F-93/038
  Integrating Removal  and Remedial Site  As-
  sessment Investigations.
  PB93-963341/CDH               See 0939
EPA/540/F-93/039
  Determination of Imminent and Substantial En-
  dangerment for Removal Actions.
  PB93-963416/CDH               See 1000
EPA/540/F-93/041
  Emergency Responders Agreements for Fund-
  Lead Remedial Actions.
  PB93-963418/CDH               See 1001
EPA/540/F-93/042
  Revisions to OMB Circular A-94 on Guidelines
  and Discount Rates for Benefit-Cost Analysis.
  PB93-963297/CDH               See 1107
EPA/540/F-93/047
  Presumptive Remedies: Policy and Procedures.
  PB93-963345/CDH               See 1103
EPA/540/F-93/048
  Presumptive Remedies:  Site Characterization
  and Technology Selection for CERCLA Sites
  with Volatile Organic Compounds in Soils.
  PB93-963346/CDH               See 1104
EPA/540/F-93/049
  Data Quality Objectives Process for Superfund.
  PB94-963207/CDH               See 0982
EPA/540/F-93/050
  Superfund Program  and  Information Manage-
  ment Update. Volume 1, Number 1, November
  1993.
  PB94-963208/CDH               See 0123
EPA/540/F-94/009
  Conducting Non-Time-Critical Removal Actions
  under CERCLA.
  PB93-963422/CDH               See 0999
EPA/540/F-94/015
  Procedure for Use of USAGE Preplaced Con-
  tracts to  Expedite Superfund Cleanup Tasks.
  PB94-963243/CDH               See 1131
EPA/540/F-94/32
  Military Base Closures: Guidance on EPA Con-
  currence in the Identification of  Uncontaminat-
  ed Parcels under CERCLA Section 120(h)(4).
  PB94-963249/CDH               See 0899
EPA/540/G-87/003
  Data Quality  Objectives for  Remedial  Re-
  sponse  Activities: Development Process.  Ex-
  ample Scenario:  RI/FS Activities at a Site with
  Contaminated Soils and Ground Water.
  PB96-272634/CDH               See 6980
EPA/540/G-87/004
  Data Quality  Objectives for  Remedial  Re-
  sponse  Activities: Development Process.  Ex-
  ample Scenario:  RI/FS Activities at a Site with
  Contaminated Soils and Ground Water.
  PB90-272634/CDH               See 0980
NU-10

-------
                                                        NUMBER INDEX
                                                                 EPA/540/R-92/016A
 EPA/540/G-88/001
   Citizens' Guidance Manual for the Technical
-   Assistance Grant Program.
   PB92-101435/CDH               See 0463
   Superfund Technical Assistance Grant (TAG)
   Handbook.
   PB91-238592/CDH               See 0499
 EPA/540/G-89/006
   CERCLA Compliance with Other Laws Manual.
   Part 1. Interim Final.
   PB90-272535/CDH               See 0409
 EPA/540/G-89/008
   ARCS (Alternative  Remedial Contract Strategy)
   Contracts Users' Manual.
   PB90-108549/CDH               See 0019
 EPA/540/G-89/009
   CERCLA (Comprehensive  Environmental Re-
   sponse, Compensation and Liability Act) Com-
   pliance with Other Laws Manual: Part 2. Clean
   Air Act and Other Environmental Statutes and
   State Requirements.
   PB90-148461 /CDH               See 0413
 EPA/540/G-89/010
   Health and Safety Audit Guidelines: SARA Title
   I, Section 126.
   PB90-204157/CDH               See 0916
 EPA/540/G-90/001
   Guidance on EPA Oversight of Remedial De-
   signs and Remedial Actions Performed by Po-
   tentially Responsible Parties.
   PB90-226069/CDH               See 1128
 EPA/540/G-90/002
   Scoper's Notes: An  RI/FS  Costing  Guide.
   Bringing in a Quality RI/FS on Time and Within
   Budget.
   PB90-258369/CDH               See 1117
 EPA/540/G-90/003
   Hazmat Team Planning Guidance.
   PB90-274523/CDH               See 0915
 EPA/540/G-90/004
   Quality  Assurance/Quality  Control Guidance
   for Removal Activities:  Sampling QA/QC Plan
   and Data Validation Procedures.
   PB90-274481/CDH               See 0993
 EPA/540/G-90/005
   CERCLA Site Discharges to POTWs: Guidance
   Manual.
   PB90-274531/CDH               See 1576
 EPA/540/G-90/006
   Guidance on Expediting Remedial  Design and
   Remedial Action.
   PB90-273871/CDH               See 1129
 EPA/540/G-90/007
   Guidance on Remedial Actions for Superfund
   Sites with PCB Contamination.
   PB91-145466/CDH               See 1260
   Guidance on Remedial Actions for Superfund
   Sites with PCB Contamination.
   PB91-921206/CDH               See 1261
 EPA/540/G-90/008
   Guidance for Data Useability in Risk Assess-
   ment. Interim Report.
   PB91-921208/CDH                See 1032
 EPA/540/G-91/001
   Continuous Release-Emergency Response No-
   tification  System  and  Priority Assessment
   Model: User's Manual for EPA Regions.
   PB91-168450/CDH                See 1144
 EPA/540/G-91/002
   Assessing Reports of Continuous Releases of
   Hazardous Substances: A Guide for EPA Re-
  gions.
  PB91-921315/CDH
                                  See 1142
EPA/540/G-91/003
  Reporting  Requirements for Continuous  Re-
  leases of Hazardous Substances: A Guide for
  Facilities and Vessels on Compliance.
  PB91-167593/CDH                See 1150
EPA/540/G-91/004
  Continuous Release-Emergency Response No-
  tification  System  and  Priority Assessment
  Model: Model Documentation.
  PB91-168468/CDH                See 1143
EPA/540/G-91/005
  Continuous Release -  Emergency Response
  Notification System. User's Manual for  Indus-
  try.
  PB91-921287/CDH                See 1145
EPA/540/G-91/010A
  Guidance on Oversight of Potentially Respon-
  sible Party Remedial Investigations  and  Feasi-
  bility Studies. Volume 1.
  PB91-228361/CDH                See 1094
EPA/540/G-91/010B
  Guidance on Oversight of Potentially Respon-
  sible Party Remedial Investigations  and  Feasi-
  bility Studies. Volume 2. Appendices.
  PB91-228379/CDH                See 1095
EPA/540/G-91/012
  Contracting and Subcontracting Guide to the
  Superfund  Program.
  PB92-963274/CDH                See 0023
EPA/540/K-93/001
  Superfund  Technical Assistance Grants (Fact
  Sheet).
  PB93-963301                     See 0503
EPA/540/K-93/002
  Superfund    Technical   Assistance   Grants
  (TAGS) (Pamphlet).
  PB93-963302                    See 0505
EPA/540/K-93/003
  Superfund  Technical Assistance Grant  (TAG)
  Handbook: Applying  for Your Grant.
  PB93-963352                   See 0500
  Understanding  Oil  Spills  and  Oil  Spill  Re-
  sponse.
  PB93-963409/CDH                See 0978
EPA/540/K-93/004
  Superfund  Technical Assistance Grant  (TAG)
  Handbook: The Application Forms with Instruc-
  tions.
  PB93-963353                     See 0501
EPA/540/M5-91/005
  Superfund  Innovative  Technology  Evaluation
  (SITE): Demonstration Bulletin. Flame Reactor,
  Horsehead Resource Development Company,
  Inc.
  PB92-235613/CDH          •     See 1319
EPA/540/M-90/010
  Tech Trends Number 3, December 1990.
  PB93-206357/CDH               See 1325
EPA/540/M-91/001
  Tech Trends Number 4, March 1991.
  PB93-206365/CDH               See 1326
EPA/540/M-91/002
  Tech Trends Number 5, May 1991.
  PB93-206373/CDH               See 1327
EPA/540/M-91/003
  Abstract  Proceedings:  Superfund  Technical
  Support  Project  General  Meeting. Held  in
  Athens, Georgia on December 3-6, 1990.
  PB93-205862/CDH               See 1187
EPA/540/N-92/001
  Bioremediation: An Information Update on  Ap-
  plying Bioremediation to Site Cleanup.
  PB93-126175/CDH               See 1421
EPA/540/P-90/003
  Removal  Cost  Management System: Version
  3.2.
  PB90-272691/CDH               See 1009
EPA/540/P-90/005
  Guidelines for the Cleanup of Clandestine Drug
  Laboratories.
  PB90-272709/CDH               See 1007
EPA/540/P-90/006
  Sampler's Guide to the Contract  Laboratory
  Program.
  PB91-921330/CDH               See 0071
EPA/540/P-91/001
  Conducting Remedial Investigations/Feasibility
  Studies for CERCLA Municipal Landfill Sites.
  PB91-921205/CDH               See 1084
EPA/540/P-91/002
  User's Guide to the Contract Laboratory Pro-
  gram.
  PB91-921278/CDH               See 0080
EPA/540/P-91/013
  Guidance on Site  Assessment Cooperative
  Agreements.
  PB92-224385/CDH               See 0475
EPA/540/R-92/001
  Technology Evaluation Report: Ogden Circulat-
  ing  Bed Combustor at the McColl Superfund
  Site.
  PB92-227289/CDH               See 1344
EPA/540/R-92/005
  Presentations EPA-State Soil Standards Con-
  ference. Held in Crystal City, Virginia on Janu-
  ary 29, 1991.
  PB92-963350/CDH               See 1524
EPA/540/R-92/009
  Community Relations in  Superfund: A  Hand-
  book.
  PB92-963341/CDH               See 0467
EPA/540/R-92/012
  Superfund  Innovative  Technology  Evaluation
  Program:  Spring Update  to the  Technology
  Profiles. Fourth Edition.
  PB92-233121/CDH               See 1314
EPA/540/R-92/013A
  Guide  for  Conducting  Treatability  Studies
  under CERCLA: Chemical Dehalogenation.
  PB92-169044/CDH               See 1161
  Guide  for  Conducting  Treatability  Studies
  under CERCLA:  Chemical Dehalogenation.
  Final Report.
  PB92-231307/CDH               See 1162
EPA/540/R-92/013B
  Chemical  Dehalogenation Treatability Studies
  under CERCLA: An Overview.
  PB92-231299/CDH               See 1153
  Chemical  Dehalogenation Treatability Studies
  under CERCLA: An Overview.
  PB92-169275/CDH               See 1209
EPA/540/R-92/015
  Technology  Evaluation Report:  Site Program
  Demonstration of a Trial Excavation  at the
  McColl Superfund Site.
  PB92-226448/CDH               See 1349
EPA/540/R-92/016A
  Guide  for  Conducting  Treatability  Studies
  under CERCLA Solvent  Extraction.  Interim
  Guidance.
  PB92-239581/CDH               See 1167
                                                                                                                          NU-11

-------
 EPA/540/R-92/016B
           NUMBER INDEX
 EPA/540/R-92/016B
   Gukte  for  Conducting  Treatability Studies
   under CERCLA: Solvent Extraction Quick Ref-
   erence Fact Sheet
   P892-239599/CDH                See 1168
 EPA7540/R-S2/617A
   Technology Evaluation  Report: Babcock and
   WBcox Cyclone Furnace Vitrification Technolo-
   gy. Volume 1.
   PB92-222215/CDH                See 1337
 EPA/540/R-92/020
   Suporfund  Emergency Response  Actions: A
   Summary of Federally-Funded Removals. Sixth
   Annual Report, Fiscal Year 1991.
   P892-963421/CDH                See 0315
 EPA/640/R-92/021
   Guidance  for  Performing  Site   Inspections
   under GERCLA.
                        " ,'",         See0343
   Hazard Raning System Guidance Manual.
   PB92-9e3377/CDH                See 0346
                                   See 0044
             |     ..........................
   ffintof-Protoge Program. .....
   PB83-963251/CDH
 EPA/E40/R-92/071A
   Guide  for  Conducting  Treatability  Studies
   undor CERCLA.
   PB93-126787/CDH                See 1155
 EPA/640/R-92/073
   technical Guidance  Document: Construction
   Quality Management  for Remedial Action and
   Remedial Design Waste Containment Systems.
   PB93-105625/CDH                See 1334
 EPA/540/R-92/074A
   Gukie  (or  Conducting  Treatability  Studies
   under' CERCLA: Thermal Desorptton Remedy
   Selection. Interim Guidance.
   P93-126597/CDH                See 1170
                        ,,        .       ,
   Glde  for  Conducting  Treatabiiity  Studies
   ufKhw CERCLA:  Thermal  Desorption Quick
   Reference Fact Sheet.
   PB93-121325/COH                See 1169
 EPA/540/R-92/076
   Superfund Innovativa  Technology Evaluation
   Program:   Progress   and   Accomplishments
   Fiscal Year 1991. A 5th Report to Congress.
.•  raas-iaesja./cwi ............... .....  see 13,1,3
 EPA764b/R-92/077
   Supertuod Innovative  Technology Evaluation
   Program: Technology Profiles, Fifth Edition.
   PB93-163053/CDH                See 1315
 EPA/540/R-92/079A
   technology Evaluation Report. SITE Program
   Demonstration, Resources Conservation Com-
   pany,  Baste  Extractive  Sludge  Treatment
   (B.E.S.T. (Trade Name)), Grand Calumet River,
   Gary, Indiana. Volume  1.
   PB93.227122/CDH                See 1593
   Technology Evaluation Report. SITE Program
   Demonstration, Resources Conservation Com-
   pany,  Basic  Extractive  Sludge  Treatment
   (8,ES.t. (trade Name)), Grand Calumet River,
   Gary, Indiana. Volume 2. Part 1.
   PB93-227130/CDH                See 1594
 EPA/540/R-92/079C
   Technology Evaluation Report. SITE Program
   Demonstration, Resources Conservation Com-
   pany,  Baste  Extractive  Sludge  Treatment
   (B.E.S.T. (Trade Name)), Grant Calumet River,
   Gary, Indiana. Volume 2. Part 2.
   PB93-227148/COII                See 1595
EPA/540/R-92/079D
  Technology Evaluation Report. SITE  Program
  Demonstration,  Resources Conservation Com-
  pany,  Basic  Extractive  Sludge  Treatment
  (B.E.S.T. (Trade Name)), Grand Calumet River,
  Gary, Indiana. Volume 2. Part 3.
  PB93-227155/CDH               See 1596
EPA/540/R-92/080
  SITE-Emerging  Technologies:  Laser  Induced
  Photochemical Oxidative Destruction  of Toxic
  Organics in Leachates and Groundwaters.
  PB93-131431/CDH               See 1591
EPA/540/R-93/001
  National  Priorities List Sites: Alabama, 1992.
  PB93-963201                    See 0150
EPA/540/R-93/002
  National Priorities List Sites: Alaska, 1992.
  PB93-963202/CDH               See 0153
EPA/540/R-93/003
  National   Priorities  List  Sites:   Arizona  and
  Nevada, 1992.
  PB93-963204/CDH               See 0158
EPA/540/R-93/004
  National  Priorities List Sites: Arkansas, 1992.
  PB93-963205/CDH               See 0161
EPA/540/R-93/005
  National  Priorities  List Sites:  California  and
  Hawaii, 1992.
  PB93-963206/CDH               See 0164
EPA/540/R-93/006
  National  Priorities List Sites: Colorado, 1992.
  PB93-963207/CDH               See 0167
EPA/540/R-93/007
  National   Priorities  List  Sites:  Connecticut,
  1992.
  PB93-963208/CDH               See 0170
EPA/540/R-93/008
  National  Priorities List Sites: Delaware, 1992.
  PB93-963209/CDH               See 0173
EPA/540/R-93/009
  National Priorities List Sites: Florida, 1992.
  PB93-963210/CDH               See 0176
EPA/540/R-93/010
  National Priorities List Sites: Georgia, 1992.
  PB93-963211 /CDH               See 0179
EPA/540/R-93/011
  National Priorities List Sites: Idaho, 1992.
  PB93-963212/CDH               See 0183
EPA/540/R-93/012
  National Priorities List Sites: Illinois, 1992.
  PB93-963213/CDH               See 0186
EPA/540/R-93/013
  National Priorities List Sites: Indiana, 1992.
  PB93-963214/CDH               See 0189
EPA/540/R-93/014
  National Priorities List Sites: Iowa, 1992.
  PB93-963215/CDH               See 0192
EPA/540/R-93/015
  National Priorities List Sites: Kansas, 1992.
  PB93-963216/CDH               See 0195
EPA/540/R-93/016
  National  Priorities List Sites: Kentucky, 1992.
  PB93-963217/CDH               See 0198
EPA/540/R-93/017
  National  Priorities List Sites: Louisiana, 1992.
  PB93-963218/CDH               See 0201
EPA/540/R-93/018
  National Priorities List Sites: Maine, 1992.
  PB93-963219/CDH               See 0204
EPA/540/R-93/019
  National Priorities List Sites: Maryland, 1992.
  PB93-963220/CDH                See 0207
EPA/540/R-93/020
  National Priorities  List  Sites:  Massachusetts,
  1992.
  PB93-963221/CDH                See 0210
EPA/540/R-93/021
  National Priorities List Sites: Michigan, 1992.
  PB93-963222/CDH                See 0213
EPA/540/R-93/022
  National Priorities List Sites: Minnesota, 1992.
  PB93-963223/CDH                See 0216
EPA/540/R-93/023
  National Priorities List Sites: Mississippi, 1992.
  PB93-963224/CDH                See 0219
EPA/540/R-93/024
  National Priorities  List  Sites:  Missouri, 1992f
  PB93-963225/CDH                See 0222
EPA/540/R-93/025
  National Priorities List Sites: Montana, 1992.
  PB93-963226/CDH                See 0225
EPA/540/R-93/026
  National Priorities List Sites: Nebraska, 1992.
  PB93-963227/CDH                See 0228
EPA/540/R-93/027
  National Priorities List Sites: New Hampshire,
  1992.
  PB93-963228/CDH                See 0231
EPA/540/R-93/028
  National Priorities List Sites: New Jersey, 1992.
  PB93-963229/CDH                See 0234
EPA/540/R-93/029
  National  Priorities List  Sites:  New Mexico,
  1992.
  PB93-963230/CDH                See 0237
EPA/540/R-93/030
  National Priorities List Sites: New York, 1992.
  PB93-963231/CDH                See 0240
EPA/540/R-93/031
  National Priorities  List  Sites:  North Carolina,
  1992.
  PB93-963232/CDH                See 0245
EPA/540/R-93/032
  National Priorities List Sites: North and South
  Dakota, 1992.
  PB93-963233/CDH                See 0242
EPA/540/R-93/033
  National Priorities List Sites: Ohio, 1992.
  PB93-963234/CDH                See 0249
EPA/540/R-93/034
  National Priorities List Sites: Oklahoma, 1992.
  PB93-963235/CDH                See 0252
EPA/540/R-93/035
  National Priorities List Sites: Oregon, 1992.
  PB93-963236/CDH                See 0255
EPA/540/R-93/036
  National  Priorities List  Sites: Pennsylvania,
  1992.
  PB93-963237/CDH                See 0258
EPA/540/R-93/037
  National  Priorities  List Sites: Rhode Island,
  1992.
  PB93-963239/CDH                See 0264
EPA/540/R-93/038
  National Priorities  List  Sites:  South Carolina,
  1992.
  PB93-963240/CDH                See 0268
 Ny-12
                                                                                                	ii:

-------
                                                       NUMBER INDEX
                                                                   EPA/540/R-94/018
EPA/540/R-93/039
  National Priorities List Sites: Tennessee, 1992.
  PB93-963241/CDH               See 0271
EPA/540/R-93/040
  National Priorities List Sites: Texas, 1992.
  PB93-963242/CDH               See 0274
EPA/540/R-93/041
  National Priorities List Sites: Utah, 1992.
  PB93-963243/CDH               See 0278
EPA/540/R-93/042
  National Priorities List Sites: Vermont,  1992.
  PB93-963244/CDH               See 0281
EPA/540/R-93/043
  National Priorities List Sites: Virginia, 1992.
  PB93-963245/GDH               See 0284
EPA/540/R-93/044
  National  Priorities  List  Sites:  Washington,
  1992.
  PB93-963246/CDH               See 0287
EPA/540/R-93/045
  National Priorities  List Sites: West  Virginia,
  1992.
  PB93-963247/CDH         ,      See 0290
EPA/540/R-93/046
  National Priorities List  Sites: Wisconsin, 1992.
  PB93-963248/CDH               See 0293
EPA/540/R-93/047
  National Priorities List Sites:  Wyoming,  1992.
  PB93-963249/CDH               See 0296
EPA/540/R-93/048
  National Priorities List  Sites:  Puerto Rico and
  Virgin Islands, 1992.
  PB93-963238/CDH               See 0261
EPA/540/R-93/049
  National Priorities List Sites: The United States
  Territories, 1992.
  PB93-963203/CDH               See 0275
EPA/540/R-93/051
  Specifications and Guidance for Contaminant-
  Free Sample Containers.
  PB93-963316/CDH               See 0994
EPA/540/R-93/053
  Compendium of Good Ideas: Models of Suc-
  cess and Lessons Learned. Volume  1. High-
  lights.
  PB93-963271/CDH        ,       See 0133
EPA/540/R-93/054
  Compendium of Good Ideas: Models of Suc-
  cess and Lessons Learned. Volume 2. Source
  Book.
  PB93-963272/CDH               See 0134
EPA/540/R-93/055
  Superfund:  EPA/ICMA Superfund Revitaliza-
  tion Conference. Held in  Chicago, Illinois on
  November 12-13, 1992.
  PB93-963274/CDH               See 0319
EPA/540/R-93/057
  Guidance on Conducting Non-Time-Critical Re-
  moval Actions under CERCLA.
  PB93-963402/CDH               See 1005
EPA/540/R-93/059
  Compendium of ROD  Language for  FY 1993
  Focus Areas.
  PB93-963328/CDH               See 1083
EPA/540/R-93/067
  Superfund Administrative Improvements. Exec-
  utive Summary.
  PB93-963294/CDH               See 0310
EPA/540/R-93/068
  Superfund Administrative Improvements. Final
  Report.
  PB93-963295/CDH               See 0311
EPA/540/R-93/071
  Data Quality Objectives Process for Superfund.
  PB94-963205/CDH               See 0981
  Data Quality Objectives Process for Superfund:
  Interim Final Guidance.
  PB94-963203/CDH               See 0983
EPA/540/R-93/072
  Superfund Reauthorization: NACEPT Subcom-
  mittee Handbook.
  PB93-963298/CDH               See 0331
EPA/540/R-93/073
  Evaluation of the Likelihood of DNAPL Pres-
  ence at NPL Sites: National Results.
  PB93-963343/CDH               See 1448
EPA/540/R-93/077
  Superfund: EPA/ICMA Superfund  Revitaliza-
  tion Conference. Held in San Francisco, Cali-
  fornia on February 1-2, 1993.
  PB94-963202/CDH               See 0320
EPA/540/R-93/078
  Data Quality Objectives Process for Superfund:
  Workbook.
  PB94-963204/CDH               See 0984
EPA/540/R-93/079
  FACT BOOK: National Priorities List under the
  Original Hazard  Ranking System, 1981-1991.
  PB93-963350/CDH               See 0340
EPA/540/R-93/080
  Guidance for Evaluating the Technical Imprac-
  ticability of Ground-Water Restoration.
  PB93-963507/CDH               See 1460
EPA/540/R-93/084
  Superfund  Revitalization:  Measures of  Suc-
  cess.
  PB94-963217/CDH               See 0334
EPA/540/R-93/501
  Technology   Evaluation  Report:  Perox-Pure
  (Trade Name) Chemical Oxidation Technology.
  PB93-213528/CDH               See 1345
EPA/540/R-93/506A
  Chemical     Waste    Management,     Inc.
  PO*WW*ER  (Trade Name) Evaporation-Cata-
  lytic Oxidation Technology. Technology Eval-
  uation Report. Volume 1.
  PB94-160637/CDH               See 1213
EPA/540/R-93/506B
  Chemical     Waste    Management,     Inc.
  PO*WW*ER  (Trade Name) Evaporation-Cata-
  lytic Oxidation Technology. Technology Evalu-
  tion Report. Volume 2.
  PB94-160660/CDH               See 1214
EPA/540/R-93/507
  SITE Emerging Technologies Project: Babcock
  and Wilcox Cyclone Vitrification.
  PB93-163038/CDH               See 1303
EPA/540/R-93/508
  Technology Evaluation Report:  SITE Program
  Demonstration.  EPA  RREL's Mobile  Volume
  Reduction Unit
  PB94-136264/CDH               See 1348
EPA/540/R-93/509
  Technology  Evaluation  Report:  Site Program
  Demonstration  Test.  Accutech  Pneumatic
  Fracturing Extraction  and Hot  Gas  Injection,
  Phase 1. Volume 1.
  PB93-216596/CDH               See 1352
EPA/540/R-93/510
  BioGenesis (Trade Name) Soil Washing Tech-
  nology:  Innovative   Technology  Evaluation
  Report.
  PB94-120045/CDH               See 1490
EPA/540/R-93/515
  Emerging Technology Report:  Metals Treat-
  ment at Superfund Sites by Absorptive Filtra-
  tion.
  PB93-231165/CDH               See 1232
EPA/540/R-93/517
  Technology Evaluation  Report: Toronto  Har-
  bour Commissioners (THC) Soil Recycle Treat-
  ment Train.
  PB93-216067/CDH               See 1543
  Toronto Harbour Commissioners (THC)  Soil
  Recycle Treatment Train. Applications Analysis
  Report.
  PB94-124674/CDH               See 1544
EPA/540/R-93/518
  Superfund  Innovative Technology  Evaluation
  (SITE)  Program  Evaluation Report for Antox
  BTX Water Screen (BTX Immunoassay).
  PB93-218337/CDH               See 1320
EPA/540/R-93/519A
  Guide   for  Conducting  Treatability  Studies
  under  CERCLA:  Biodegradation  Remedy Se-
  lection. Interim Guidance.
  PB94-117470/CDH               See 1159
EPA/540/R-93/519B
  Guide   for  Conducting  Treatability  Studies
  under  CERCLA:  Biodegradation  Remedy Se-
  lection. Quick Reference Fact Sheet.
  PB94-144136/CDH               See 1160
EPA/540/R-93/521
  Site Emerging Technologies: Bioscrubber for
  Removing Hazardous Organic Emissions from
  Soil, Water and Air Decontamination Process-
  es.
  PB93-227205/CDH               See 1302
EPA/540/R-93/523
  Handbook for Constructed Wetlands Receiving
  Acid Mine Drainage.
  PB93-233914/CDH               See 1588
EPA/540/R-93/525
  Superfund  Innovative Technology  Evaluation
  Program: Annual  Report to Congress 1992.
  PB94-123874/CDH               See 1309
EPA/540/R-93/526
  Superfund  Innovative Technology  Evaluation
  Program: Technology Profiles, Sixth Edition.
  PB94-123858/CDH               See 1318
EPA/540/R-94/012
  USEPA Contract Laboratory Program National
  Functional   Guidelines   for   Organic  Data
  Review.
  PB94-963501/CDH               See 0077
EPA/540/R-94/013
  USEPA Contract Laboratory Program National
  Functional   Guidelines  for  Inorganic  Data
  Review.
  PB94-963502/CDH               See 0997
EPA/540/R-94/014
  Audit Management Process. Reference Guide.
  PB94-963232/CDH               See 0085
EPA/540/R-94/015
  SRIS System Overview and  User's Guide.
  PB94-963233/CDH               See 0112
EPA/540/R-94/016
  Progress  Toward  Implementing  Superfund,
  Fiscal Year 1991. Report to  Congress.
  PB94-963234/CDH               See 0302
EPA/540/R-94/018
  Technical Background Document for Draft Soil
  Screening Level Guidance.
  PB94-963503/CDH               See 1537
                                                                                                                          NU-13

-------
EPA/540/R-94/021
           NUMBER INDEX
EPA/54Q/R-94/P21
  Suporfund  Program  Management  Manual,
  Fiscal Year 1994.
  PB94-963247/CDH                See 0073
EPA/540/S5-89/011
  Suporfund Innovative Technology Evaluation
  Technology Demonstration Summary: Chemfix
  SolidincaUon/Stabilization Process, Clackamas,
  Oregon.
  PB91-921373/CDH                See 1564
EPA/S40/S5-90/007
  Technology Demonstration Summary, DuPont/
  Cjjeflin""  Microfiltrajon  System,  Palmerton,
  Pennsylvania. April-May 1992.
  PB92-224351/COH                See 1336
EPA/540/S5-91/003
  Technology Demonstration Summary: Bio Trol
  So» Washing System for Treatment of a Wood
  Preserving Site.
  P892.224393/a}H                See 1538
EP|/54Q;/g5.9J;/OQi5,	
  'florsefiead Resource  Development Company,
  Inc., Ram* Reactor Technology. Technology
  Demonstration Summary.
  P893.14S639/CDH                See 1264
EPA/540/S-92/001
  Chemical Enhancements to  Pump-and-Treat
  Remediation. Ground Water Issue.
  PB92-180074/COH                See 1434
EPA/S40/S-92/OQ3
   lil.«
-------
                                                       NUMBER INDEX
                                                                   EPA/600/A-92/079
EPA/542/R-92/012
  Cleaning Up the Nation's Waste Sites: Markets
  and Technology Trends.
  PB93-140762/GDH               See 0132
EPA/560/2-90/001
  SARA (Superfund Amendments and Reauthor-
  ization Act) Section 313 Roadmaps Data Base.
  User's Manual. Version 2.10.
  PB90-174855/CDH               See 0304
EPA/560/S-89/003
  Identification  of SARA (Superfund  Amend-
  ments and Reauthorization Act) Compounds in
  Adipose Tissue.
  PB90-132564/CDH               See 1055
EPA/600/2-90/002
  New Approach and Methodologies for Charac-
  terizing  the  Hydrogeologic  Properties   of
  Aquifers.
  PB90-187063/CDH               See 1470
EPA/600/2-91/050
  Evaluation of Alternative Treatment Technol-
  ogies for CERCLA Soils and Debris (Summary
  of Phase 1 and Phase 2).
  PB91-240572/CDH               See 1504
EPA/600/2-91/058
  Pilot-Scale Incineration of  Contaminated Soil
  from  the  Purity Oil Sales and McColl Super-
  fund Sites.
  PB92-105857/CDH               See 1290
EPA/600/3-89/074
  Toxicity  Bioassay and Eluate Heavy Metals
  Analysis Results of the Bench Scale Stabiliza-
  tion Study of Soils from the  United Chrome
  Superfund NPL (National Priority List) Site Cor-
  vallis, Oregon.
  PB90-120049/CDH               See 1546
EPA/600/3-90/015
  Metals Testing Report: Metal Content of Envi-
  ronmental Samples from Region 4.
  PB90-187105/CDH               See 1282
EPA/600/3-91/011
  Biological Assessment of Toxicity Caused  by
  Chemical Constituents Eluted  from Site Soils
  Collected at the  Drake Chemical  Superfund
  Site,  Lock Haven,  Clinton  Co., Pennsylvania.
  PB91-186965/CDH               See 1491
EPA/600/3-91/046
  Application  of a  Water Quality Assessment
  Modeling System at a Superfund Site.
  PB92-164490/CDH               See 1573
EPA/600/3-91/071
  Superfund Innovative  Technology Evaluation:
  The Delaware SITE Study, 1989.
  PB92-125749/CDH               See 1322
EPA/600/4-90/013
  Rationale for the Assessment of Errors in the
  Sampling of Soils.
  PB90-242306/CDH               See 1526
EPA/600/4-90/034
  Evaluation of Exposure Markers.
  PB91-144675/CDH               See 1246
EPA/600/4-91/028
  Superfund Innovative  Technology  Evaluation
  Program Demonstration Plan for Westinghouse
  Bio-Analytic Systems  Pentachlorophenol  Im-
  munoassays.
  PB92-170190/CDH               See 1310
EPA/600/8-88/054
  Health Effects Assessment for Styrene.
  PB90-142357/CDH               See 1046
EPA/600/8-88/058
  Health Effects Assessment for 2,4,5-Trichloro-
  phenoxy Acetic Acid (2,4,5-T).
  PB90-142365/CDH               See 1050
EPA/600/8-89/053
  Methodology for Evaluating Potential Carcino-
  genicity in Support of Reportable Quantity Ad-
  justments Pursuant to CERCLA  Section 102.
  PB93-230027/CDH               See 1146
EPA/600/8-89/084
  Framework  for  Real-Time  Decision-Making:
  New Bedford Harbor Pilot Dredging Study.
  PB90-150822/CDH               See 1587
EPA/600/8-89/085
  Updated Health Effects Assessment for Ace-
  tone.
  PB90-142373/CDH               See 1080
EPA/600/8-89/086
  Health Effects Assessment for Benzene.
  PB90-142381/CDH               See 1035
EPA/600/8-89/087
  Health Effects Assessment for Cadmium.
  PB90-142399/CDH               See 1036
EPA/600/8-89/088
  Health Effects Assessment for Carbon Tetra-
  chloride.
  PB90-142407/CDH               See 1037
EPA/600/8-89/089
  Health Effects Assessment for Chlordane.
  PB90-142415/CDH               See 1038
EPA/600/8-89/090
  Health Effects Assessment for Chloroform.
  PB90-142423/CDH               See 1040
EPA/600/8-89/091
  Health Effects Assessment for DDT.
  PB90-142431/CDH               See 1041
EPA-600/8-89/092
  Health  Effects  Assessment  for  Methylene
  Chloride.
  PB90-142449/CDH               See 1043
EPA/600/8-89/093
  Health  Effects Assessment for  Methyl Ethyl
  Ketone.
  PB90-142456/CDH               See 1042
EPA/600/8-89/094
  Health  Effects Assessment for  Naphthalene.
  PB90-142464/CDH               See 1044
EPA/600/8-89/095
  Health Effects Assessment for Phenol.
  PB90-142472/CDH               See 1045
EPA/600/8-89/096
  Health Effects Assessment for Tetrachloroeth-
  ylene.
  PB90-142480/CDH               See 1047
EPA/600/8-89/097
  Health  Effects Assessment for Trichloroethy-
  lene.
  PB90-142498/CDH               See 1048
EPA/600/8-89/098
  Health Effects Assessment for Xylenes.
  PB90-142506/CDH               See 1049
EPA/600/8-89/099
  Health Effects Assessment for Chlorobenzene.
  PB90-142514/CDH               See 1039
EPA/600/8-90/046
  Measurement of Hydraulic Conductivity Distri-
  butions: A Manual of Practice.
  PB91-211938/CDH               See 1467
EPA/600/8-90/052
  Evaluation of Emission Factors for Formalde-
  hyde from Certain  Wood  Processing  Oper-
  ations. Final Report, May-August 1989.
  PB90-254988/CDH               See 1410
EPA-600/8-91/008
  Characterizing soils for hazardous waste site
  assessments.
  DE91014097/CDH                See 1495
EPA/600/9-89/072
  International Conference on New Frontiers for
  Hazardous Waste  Management (Third) Pro-
  ceedings. Held in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania on
  September 10-13,1989.
  PB90-127200/CDH               See 1278
EPA/600/9-90/012
  Operations and Research at the U.S. EPA In-
  cineration Research Facility: Annual Report for
  FY89.
  PB90-186339/CDH               See 1482
EPA/600/9-90/034
  Role of Health Research in Support of  EPA's
  Regulatory Programs.
  PB91-211912/CDH               See 1074
EPA/600/9-91/010
  Operations and Research at the U.S. EPA In-
  cineration Research Facility: Annual Report for
  FY90.
  PB91-182493/CDH               See 1483
EPA/600/9-91/028
  International  Symposium on  Field Screening
  Methods  for  Hazardous Wastes and  Toxic
  Chemicals (2nd), Proceedings. Held in Las
  Vegas, Nevada on February 12-14, 1991.
  PB92-125764/CDH               See 1279
EPA/600/9-91/049
  Abstracts of  Phase 1 and Phase 2  Awards:
  Small Business Innovation Research  Program
  1991.
  PB94-146495/CDH               See 0016
EPA/600/A-92/003
  EPA SITE Demonstration of  the Horsehead
  Resource Development Company Flame  Reac-
  tor Technology.
  PB92-139401/CDH               See 1242
EPA/600/A-92/010
  Superfund Soils Data Management System.
  PB92-139476/CDH               See 1536
EPA/600/A-92/012
  Quality and   Environmental  Protection: The
  EPA QA Program.
  PB92-143791 /CDH               See 0990
EPA/600/A-92/019
  Control Technologies for Defunct lead Battery
  Recycling Sites: Overview and Recent Devel-
  opments. Volume 3.
  PB92-150416/CDH               See 1220
EPA/600/A-92/030
  Developments in Chemical Treatment of Con-
  taminated Soil.
  PB92-152933/CDH               See 1499
EPA/600/A-92/031
  PAST: The Potential ARARs  Selection Tool.
  PB92-152941 /CDH               See 0434
EPA/600/A-92/079
  Incineration Data on  Arsenic and Lead  Emis-
  sions.
  PB92-179043/CDH               See 1267
                                                                                                                           NU-15

-------
 EPA/6QO/A-92/091
                      NUMBER INDEX
EPA/600/A-92/091
  Demonstration  of Waste Treatment Technol-
  oglos,
  PB92:179670{CDH, ..... , ................... See 1229
EPA7600/A-92/174
  Bospirometrtc Methods  for Determination of
  Bfextegradability and  Blodegradatfon  Kinetics
  for Hazardous  Organic Pollutant Compounds.
  P892-217108/CDH                See 1427
EPA/$00/A-92/183
  Devstopment of Emerging Technologies within
  fb« SITE Program.
  PS92.217322/CH                See 1231
                                  .........
  '(Sot-Scale Incineration "of" PCB-Contaminated
  Sediments from the Hot Spot of the New Bed-
  ford Harbor Superfund Site.
  P882:227321/CDH                See 1291
EPA/600M42/207
  Asymmetric Loss Function for Superfund Re-
  mediation Decisions.
  PB93.106763/CDH                See 1200
EPA/600/A-92/2X9
  Evaluation of Commercially-Available Portable
  Gas Chromatographs.
  PS93-121051/CDH                See 1478
EPA/600/A-92/28S
  Small Systems Meet Superfund Challenge with
  Point-of-Entry Treatment Units.
  PB83-1411Q8/CDH                See 1304
EPA/600/A-93/007
  Postal for Joint Rgsearch between EPA and
  ttjf U.S. Anjiy.
  PB83.149227/CDH                See 1293
EPA/600/A-93/052
  Estimation of the Cost of Using Chemical Pro-
  t9ctiv-8 Clothing.
  PB93-168805/CDH                See 1244
EPA/600/A-93/053
  Evaluation of Portable Gas Chromatographs.
   B93-168813/CDH                See 147,9
                 '
See 1411
            ni of Volatile Srgante Compounds
  during Start-Up of Bloromediation of French
  United Supoflund Site in Crosby Texas Using
  Wind Dependent Whole-Air Sampling.
  PS93-168821/CDH                See 1414
EPA/80p/A:93/227 ....................
  Foam Scrubbing (Chapter 9).
  Pl93.2365eb/CDH
EPA/eOO/A-93/249
  iSi Sol Working "Work "for'  the Sand Creek
  Supoffund Site.
  PB94-112828/CDH                See 1548
EPA/600/A-94/002
  Application of 'Real-Time'  Monitoring in  Deci-
  sion  Making: The  New  Bedford Harbor Pilot
  Dredging Project,
  PBS4-130747/CDH                See 1574
EPA/600/A-94/005
  Advanced  Oxidation  Technologies  for  the
  Treatment of Contaminated Groundwater.
  PB94-137353/CDH                See 1429
EPi/60p/A:94/<}68 ............................
  Potential Surrogate Metals  for Incinerator Trial
  Bums.
  PB94-162716/CDH                See 1486
EPA/600/D-89/119
  lo-s!tu Stabilization/Solidification of PCB (Poly-
  cWortnated BiphenylsJ-Contaminated Soil.
  P890-1 13291 /CDH                See 1556
EPA/600/D-89/135
  EPA/ORD (Environmental Protection Agency/
  Office of Research  and Development) Role
  and Perspective in Sediment Research.
  PB90-113093/CDH                See 1585
EPA/600/D-89/250
  Recent Advances in Risk Reduction Engineer-
  ing.
  PB90-129339/CDH                See 1064
EPA/600/D-90/015
  Field Evaluation of the UV/Oxidation Technol-
  ogy to Treat Contaminated Groundwater. Pro-
  ceedings of  the  National Conference  (10th).
  Held in Washington, DC. on November 27-29,
  1989.
  PB90-221672/CDH                See 1453
EPA/600/D-90/088
  Guidance Documents Relating to Landfills and
  Contaminants.
  PB90-261835/CDH                See 1259
EPA/600/D-90/089
  Remediation  Completed:  But  Is the Ground-
  water Meeting the Safe Drinking Water Act Re-
  quirements. Haztech  International 90. Held in
  Houston, Texas on May 8-10,1990.
  PB90-262999/CPH                See 1473
EPA/600/D-90/152
  Quantifying Effects in  Ecological Site Assess-
  ments:   Biological  and  Statistical  Consider-
  ations.
  PB91-129189/CDH                See 1063
EPA/600/D-90/232
  Results  from the Stabilization Technologies
  Evaluated by the  Site Program. New England
  Environmental Expo 90.
  PB91-162479/CDH                See 1558
EPA/600/D-91/008
  Future of Expert Systems in the Environmental
  Protection Agency.
  PB91-162727/CDH                See 1257
EPA/600/D-91/014
  Factors  Affecting  the Applicability of Plasma
  Systems to the Cleanup of Superfund Sites.
  PB91-162784/CDH                See 1250
EPA/600/D-91/036
  Demonstration  Projects Under the  U.S. EPA
  Superfund  Innovative  Technology Evaluation
  Program.
  PB91-176891/CDH                See 1230
EPA/600/D-91/037
  Demonstration of Hazardous Waste Site Treat-
  ment Technologies.
  PB91-176909/CDH                See 1227
EPA/600/D-91/059
  Control of Transient Incinerator Emissions with
  an Oxygen Based  Combustion System.
  PB91-182725/CDH                See 1401
EPA/600/D-91/072
  Sector Sampling for VOC's during Remediation
  of Superfund Site at  Shaver's Farm, Georgia.
  PB91-182840/CDH                See 1417
EPA/600/D-91/097
  Evaluating Amphibian Responses  in Wetlands
  Impacted by  Mining Activities  in the Western
  United States.
  PB91-191106/CDH                See 1586
EPA/600/D-91/115
  Use of a Fourier Transform Spectrometer as a
  Remote Sensor at Superfund Sites.
  PB91-199844/CDH                See 1365
                                                        EPA/600/D-91/130
                                                          Aseptic Sampling of Unconsolidated Heaving
                                                          Soils in Saturated Zones.
                                                          PB91-216218/CDH                See 1489
                                                        EPA/600/D-91/141
                                                          Importance of Quality for Collection of Environ-
                                                          mental Samples. Planning, Implementing, and
                                                          Assessing Field Sampling Quality at CERCLA
                                                          Sites.
                                                          PB91-218941/CDH                See 0919
                                                        EPA/600/D-91/176
                                                          Pilot-Scale Incinerability Evaluation of Arsenic-
                                                          and Lead-Contaminated Soils from Two Super-
                                                          fund Sites.
                                                          PB91-226308/CDH                See 1288
                                                        EPA/600/D-91/201
                                                          Cost Estimating Systems for Remedial Action
                                                          Projects.
                                                          PB91-231191/CDH                See 1123
                                                        EPA/600/D-91/211
                                                          Evaluation and Testing of a Protocol to Deter-
                                                          mine the Aerobic Degradation Potential of Haz-
                                                          ardous Waste Constituents in Soil.
                                                          PB91-233296/CDH                See 1503
                                                        EPA/600/D-91/221
                                                          Harmonization of QA Procedures for Environ;
                                                          mental Data Operations: Development of a Na-
                                                          tional  Consensus Standard for Quality Assur-
                                                          ance for Environmental Programs.
                                                          PB91-240523/CDH                See 0989
                                                        EPA/600/D-91/267
                                                          Toxlcological Implementations of Remediating
                                                          Hazardous Wastes.
                                                          PB92-124171 /CDH                See 1359
                                                        EPA/600/D-91/275
                                                          Application of a Plant Test System in the Iden-
                                                          tification of  Potential  Genetic   Hazards  at
                                                          Chemical Waste Sites.
                                                          PB92-124551/CDH                See 1194
                                                        EPA/600/D-91/276
                                                          Removal of Creosote from Soil by Thermal De-
                                                          sorption.
                                                          PB92-126838/CDH                See 1530
                                                        EPA/600/D-91/285
                                                          Prospects for In situ Chemical Treatment for
                                                          Contaminated Soil.
                                                          PB92-126929/CDH
                                                                                         See 1525
EPA/600/J-88/426
  Use of 'Selenastrum capricornutum' to Assess
  the Toxicity Potential of Surface and Ground
  Water Contamination  Caused  by  Chromium
  Waste.
  PB90-108242/CDH               See 1367
EPA/600/J-89/003
  Quality Assurance for the SITE (Superfund In-
  novative  Technology  Evaluation)   Program
  Demonstrations.
  PB90-159872/CDH               See 0992
EPA/600/J-89/061
  Evaluation  of Modifications to Extraction Pro-
  cedures  Used in Analysis  of  Environmental
  Samples from Superfund Sites.
  PB90-103516/CDH               See 1247
EPA/600/J-89/278
  Filtration of Ground Water Samples for Metals
  Analysis.
  PB90-185182/CDH               See 1454
EPA/600/J-89/325
  Description of EPA SITE Demonstration  of the
  HAZCON Stabilization Process at  the  Doug-
  lassville, Pennsylvania Superfund Site.
  PB90-216334/CDH               See 1552
NU-16

-------
                                                       NUMBER INDEX
                                                                    EPA/600/J-93/512
EPA/600/J-89/419
  Using  the DMA Alkaline Unwinding Assay to
  Detect DNA Damage in Laboratory and Envi-
  ronmentally Exposed Cells and Tissues.
  PB90-245770/CDH                See 1368
EPA/600/J-89/520
  EPA Site Demonstration of the Terra Vac In
  situ Vacuum Extraction Process in Groveland,
  Massachusetts. (Site  Program Update:  Part
  VII).
  PB91-182097/CDH                See 1243
EPA/600/J-89/532
  SITE Demonstration of the American Combus-
  tion Pyretron Oxygen-Enhanced Burner.
  PB91-196246/CDH                See 1299
EPA/600/J-90/021
  SITE Demonstration of the CHEMFIX Solidifi-
  cation/Stabilization Process  at  the Portable
  Equipment Salvage Company Site.
  PB90-217621/CDH                See 1559
EPA/600/J-90/117
  Management Systems  Review of the  Super-
  fund RI/FS: Opportunities for Streamlining.
  PB90-264136/CDH                See 1101
EPA/600/J-90/275
  SITE Demonstration of the  CF Systems  Organ-
  ics Extraction System.
  PB91-145110/CDH                See 1301
EPA/600/J-90/360
  Field  Demonstration  of  the  UV/Oxidation
  Technology to Treat Ground Water Contami-
  nated with VOCs.
  PB91 -163741 /CDH                See 1452
EPA/600/J-90/361
  Control  Technology:   Estimating  Innovative
  Technology Costs for the SITE Program.
  PB91-163758/CDH                See 1222
EPA/600/J-90/413
  EPA SITE Demonstration  of the International
  Waste Technologies/Geo-Con In situ Stabiliza-
  tion/Solidification Process.
  PB91-171686/CDH                See 1553
EPA/600/J-90/414
  Use of  Electrokinetics for Hazardous  Waste
  Site Remediation.
  PB91-171694/CDH                See 1366
EPA/600/J-91/010
  Evaluating the Effectiveness of Ground Water
  Extraction Systems.
  PB91-177386/CDH                See 1443
EPA/600/J-91/012
  Incineration Treatment of  Arsenic-Contaminat-
  ed Soil.
  PB91-183541/CDH                See 1268
EPA/600/J-91/029
  Development and Use of Site-Specific  Chemi-
  cal and Biological Criteria for Assessing  New
  Bedford Harbor Pilot Dredging Project.
  PB91-182329/CDH                See 1583
EPA/600/J-91/034
  EPA Site Demonstration of BioTrol Aqueous
  Treatment System.
  PB91-182279/CDH                See 1441
EPA/600/J-91/153
  New  Methods for Modeling the  Transport  of
  Metals from Mineral Processing Wastes into
  Surface Waters.
  PB91-219097/CDH                See 1590
EPA/600/J-91/227
  On-Site  Methods  for  Assessing Chemical
  Impact on the Soil Environment Using Earth-
  worms:  A  Case  Study  at the  Baird  and
  McGuire Superfund Site, Holbrook, Massachu-
  setts.
  PB92-108166/CDH                See 1521
EPA/600/J-91/279
  Extraction of Mercury from Groundwater Using
  Immobilized Algae.
  PB92-121367/CDH                See 1450
EPA/600/J-91/300
  U.S. EPA SITE Demonstration of AWD Tech-
  nologies' AquaDetox/SVE System.
  PB92-124387/CDH                See 1363
EPA/600/J-91/328
  Biodegradation of Creosote and Pentachloro-
  phenol in Contaminated Groundwater: Chemi-
  cal and Biological Assessment.
  PB92-129659/CDH                See 1432
EPA/600/J-91/331
  Bench-Scale Evaluation of Alternative Biologi-
  cal Treatment Processes for the Remediation
  of Pentachlorophenol- and Creosote-Contami-
  nated Materials: Slurry-Phase Bioremediation.
  PB92-129683/CDH                See 1419
EPA/600/ J-91/335
  Bench-Scale Evaluation of Alternative Biologi-
  cal Treatment Processes for the Remediation
  of Pentachlorophenol- and Creosote-Contami-
  nated Materials: Solid-Phase Bioremediation.
  PB92-129725/CDH                See 1420
EPA/600/J-91/336
  Detoxification  of Pentachlorophenol and  Creo-
  sote Contaminated  Groundwater by Physical
  Extraction:  Chemical  and Biological Assess-
  ment.
  PB92-129733/CDH                See 1438
EPA/600/J-92/003
  Evaluation of  Waste Stabilized by the Solidi-
  tech SITE Technology.
  PB92-136878/CDH                See 1554
EPA/600/J-92/009
  Demonstration of Microfiltration Technology.
  PB92-136936/CDH                See 1228
EPA/600/J-92/030
  Control of Aromatic Waste Air Streams by Soil
  Bioreactors.
  PB92-144021/CDH                See 1496
EPA/600/J-92/051
  EPA SITE  Demonstration of the BioTrol Soil
  Washing Process.
  PB92-150655/CDH                See 1502
EPA/600/J-92/140
  Personnel Protection through Reconnaissance
  Robotics at Superfund Remedial Sites.
  PB92-166743/CDH                See 1286
EPA/600/J-92/158
  Behavior of Arsenic in a Rotary Kiln Incinerator
  (Journal Version).
  PB92-179845/CDH                See 1204
EPA/600/J-92/205
  Solidification/Stabilization: Is It Always Appro-
  priate.
  PB92-191188/CDH                See 1560
EPA/600/J-92/246
  Comparison: Organic  Emissions from Hazard-
  ous Waste  Incinerators versus the 1990 Toxics
  Release Inventory Air Releases.
  PB92-206267/CDH                See 1217
EPA/600/J-92/262
  Long-Path FTIR Measurements of Volatile Or-
  ganic Compounds in an Industrial Setting (July
  1989-April 1991).
  PB92-206424/CDH                See 1413
EPA/600/J-92/263
  Canister-Based Method  for Monitoring Toxic
  VOCs in Ambient Air.
  PB92-206432/CDH                See 1396
EPA/600/J-92/282
  Application   of  Tradescantia   Micronucleus
  Assay for In situ Evaluation of Potential Genet-
  ic Hazards from Exposure to Chemicals at a
  Wood-Preserving Site.
  PB92-217231/CDH                See 1195
EPA/600/J-92/296
  Control Technologies for Remediation of Con-
  taminated Soil and Waste Deposits at Super-
  fund Lead Battery Recycling Sites.
  PB92-227388/CDH                See 1221
EPA/600/J-92/403
  Chemical Stabilization of Mixed Organic and
  Metal Compounds. EPA SITE Program Demon-
  stration of the Silicate Technology Corporation
  Process.
  PB93-131787/CDH                See 1212
EPA/600/J-92/404
  Solvent  Extraction  Processes:  A  Survey of
  Systems in the SITE Program.
  PB93-131795/CDH                See 1305
EPA/600/J-93/006
  Extraction and Recovery of Lead Species from
  Soil.
  PB93-150142/CDH
See 1506
EPA/600/J-93/007
  Control  Technology:  1992  Update of  U.S.
  EPA's Superfund Innovative Technology Eval-
  uation (SITE)  Emerging Technology Program.
  PB93-150159/CDH                See 1223
EPA/600/J-93/231
  Alternating Current Electrocoagulation for Su-
  perfund Site Remediation.
  PB93-205144/CDH                See 1192
EPA/600/J-93/272
  Acid Volatile Sulfide Predicts the Acute Toxici-
  ty of Cadmium and Nickel in Sediments.
  PB93-222107/CDH                See 1572
EPA/600/J-93/296
  Removal of Radionuclides  by  Electrokinetic
  Soil Processing.
  PB93-222875/CDH                See 1531
EPA/600/J-93/324
  SITE Program  Demonstration  of the  SBP
  Technologies,   Inc.,   Membrane   Filtration
  System on Creosote-Contaminated Water.
  PB93-228567/CDH                See 1592
EPA/600/ J-93/428
  Engineering Bulletins: Aids to the Development
  of Remedial Alternatives.
  PB94-101797/CDH                See 1236
EPA/600/J-93/429
  SITE Demonstration of the Basic Extractive
  Sludge Treatment Process.
  PB94-101805/CDH                See 1300
EPA/600/J-93/453
  Comparison of  Organic Emissions from  Haz-
  ardous  Waste  Incinerators versus the  1990
  Toxic Release Inventory Air Releases.
  PB94-112836/CDH                See  1397
EPA/600/J-93/512
  Treatment  of  Nonhazardous Petroleum-Con-
  taminated Soils by Thermal  Desorption Tech-
  nologies.
  PB94-135118/CDH                See  1547
                                                                                                                            NU-17

-------
      EPA/600/J-94/140
      EPA/600/J-94/140
       Sorptfon,  Important  In  Stabilized/Solidified
       Waste Forms.
       P18MSS256/CDH               See 1563
      EPA/600/J-94/169
       Renwdtation of Contaminated Soils by Solvent
       Flushing.
       PS94-162740/CDH               Sea 1529
      EPA/600/ J-94/174
       Engineered Btofitter  for Removing  Organic
  i     Contaminants In Air.
       PB94-163532/CDH               See 1403
      EPA/eOO/M-89/030
       Aswssnwrt of Tentatively  Identified Com-
       pound* In Supariund Samples.
       PB90-253816/CDH               See 1199
      EPA/600/R-92/014
       Umitod-Usa Chemical Protective  Clothing  for
       EPA Suparfund Activities.
       PB92-143494/CDH               See 1058
      EPA/epq/R-92/032 ...........................................
 ;      Suporfund Innovative Technology Evaluation
      , (Site)  Report for the Westjnghouse Bio-Analyt-
 ?   :  ; to Systems Pontachtorophenol  (PCP)  Immun-
      ' o*|sayk  [[[
       P§92-188713/CDH               See 1321
      EPA/600/R-92/051
       Operations and Research at the U.S. EPA In-
       cineration Research Facility: Annual Report for
       FY91.
       PS92-239540/CDH               See 1484
      EPA/§pq/R.92/g68  ..................................... ....................
       Pfet-Scate Incineration of PCB-Contaminated
       Sediments from the New Bedford Harbor Hot
       Spot Suporfund Site.
       f>Bi2.i78853/CDH               See 1292
      EPA/600/R-92/t37
      , Evgluattpji pj, Porspnaj  Cooling  Devices  for
 ;'.:    ' Dtoxin C!ean-Up Operation.
       pgi2.206895/COH               See 1248
      EPA/600/R-92/142
       Oh-8lt» Engineering Report for the Low-Tem-
       perature Thermal Desorption Pilot-Scale Test
       on Contaminated Son.
.;,,    / P8J2-2le93e/CDH               See 1519
                        ~  ™ ...... ' "  " " ......... ' ' '
       AufoMQUSE: An Improvement to the MOUSE
       Computorized  Uncertainty  Analysis System
       OpentiixMl Manual.
       P893-100113/COH                See 1201
                        ........................................ "
       Pilot-Scale  Incineration   of   Contaminated
       Sludges from the Bofors-Nobel Superfund Site.
       PBa3-141034/COH               See 1289
     EPA/S&0/R-93/036 "'™l   'm^,,.,,     !  ','   ,
     •  Pfi-Scala Incineration  of ....... Contaminated Soil
       from th« Chemical Insecticide Corporation Su-
       pedund Stte.
       P883-155968/CDH               See 1523
     EPA/eoq/R.93/047
       F*pt-Sc«l« "incinora'tton of Comtaminated Soils
       fro™ fha Drako Chemical Superfund Site.
       PBQ3-163004/COH               See 1522
     EPA/600/R-93/066
       Oo-Stt«  Engineering  Report  of  the  Slurry-
       Ph«s« Btdogfcal Reactor for Pilot-Scale Test-
       Ing on Contaminated Soil.
       PS93.1782S9/CDH               See 1520
     EPA/6QO/R-93/073
       X-ray Fkxxcsconce Survey of Lead  Contami-
       nated Residential  Sods In Leadville, Colorado:
       A Case Study.
       P883-203156/COH               See 1549
           NUMBER  INDEX
 EPA/600/R-93/087
  Operations and Research at the U.S. EPA In-
  cineration Research Facility: Annual Report for
  FY92.
  PB94-114659/CDH                See 1485
 EPA/600/R-93/133
  Risk Reduction Engineering  Laboratory  Site
  Remediation Technical Support Program: FY92
  Annual Report.
  PB93-217651/CDH                See 1296
 EPA/600/R-93/184
  Evaluation  of  Unsaturated/Valdose  Zone
  Models for Superfund Sites.
  PB94-157765/CDH                See 1449
 EPA/600/R-94/006
  Literature  Review Summary of Metals Extrac-
  tion  Processes Used  to  Remove  Lead from
  Soils.
  PB94-140613/CDH                See 1518
 EPA/600/R-94/011
  Annual RREL  Research Symposium (20th) Ab-
  stract Proceedings. Held in Cincinnati, Ohio on
  March 15-17, 1994.
  PB94-159092/CDH                See 1184
 EPA/600/R-94/028
  Identification and Compilation of Unsaturated/
  Vadose Zone Models.
  PB94-157773/CDH                See 1464
 EPA/600/X-93/062
  Summary of GIS Support to Superfund.
  PB93-963506/CDH                See 1307
 EPA/625/R-92/012
  Control of Air  Emissions from Superfund Sites.
  PB93-215614/CDH                See 1400
 EPA/650/R-92/017B
  Technology Evaluation  Report: Babcock  and
  Wilcox Cyclone Furnace Vitrification Technolo-
  gy. Volume 2.
  PB92-222223/CDH               See 1338
 EPA/910/9-89/031A
  Commencement Bay Nearshore/Tideflats Fea-
  sibility Study. Executive Summary.
  PB93-181220/CDH               See 1579
 EPA/910/9-89/031B
  Commencement Bay Nearshore/Tideflats Fea-
  sibility Study. Volume 1.
  PB93-181238/CDH               See 1580
 EPA/910/9-89/031C
  Commencement Bay Nearshore/Tideflats Fea-
  sibility Study. Volume 2. Appendices.
  PB93-181246/CDH               See 1581
 EPA/910/9-89/032
  Commencement Bay Nearshore/Tideflats Fea-
  sibility Study. Development of Sediment Clean-
  up Goals.
  PB93-181253/CDH               See 1578
 EPA/9012.10-A
  Revision of CERCLA Civil Judicial  Settlement
  Authorities under Delegations 14-13-B and 14-
  14-E.
  PB91-138818/CDH               See 0602
EPA/9012.10-A-I
  Waiver of Concurrence on De Minimis Genera-
  tor Settlements.
  PB91-138826/CDH               See 0892
EPA/9012.10-B
  Redelegation of Civil Judicial  Settlement  Au-
  thorities under Delegation  14-13-B and 14-14-
  E.
 , PB91-138834/CDH               See 0593
                                                                                                         I
 EPA/9200.1-12A
  Superfund  Progress  -  Aficionado's  Version
  (Progress as of March 31, 1992).
  PB92-963267/CDH                See 0326
 EPA/9200.2-02
  Accelerated Response at NPL Sites Guidance
  (Superfund  Management Review: Recommen-
  dation No. 22).
  PB90-258302/CDH                See 0082
 EPA/9200.5-004
  OSWER Comparative Risk  Project. Executive
  Summary and Overview.
  PB90-272501/CDH                See 1062
 EPA/9200.5-250/FS
  Innovative Technology: Soil Washing.
  PB90-274184/CDH                See 1515
 EPA/9200.5-251/FS
  Innovative Technology: In-sltu Vitrification.
  PB90-274192/CDH                See 1514
 EPA/9200.5-252/FS
  Innovative Technology: Slurry-Phase Biodegra-
  dation.
  PB90-274200/CDH                See 1271
 EPA/9200.5-253/FS
  Innovative Technology: BEST Solvent Extrac-
  tion Process.
  PB90-274218/CDH                See 1270
 EPA/9200.5-254/FS
  Innovative Technology: Glycolate Dehalogena-
  tion.
  PB90-274226/CDH                See 1513
 EPA/9200.5-702
  National Priorities List Sites: Alabama.
  PB91-921209/CDH                See 0148
 EPA/9200.5-703
  National Priorities List Sites: Alaska.
  PB91-921210/CDH                See 0151
 EPA/9200.5-704
  National  Priorities  List  Sites:   Arizona and
  Nevada.
  PB91 -921211 /CDH                See 0156
 EPA/9200.5-705
  National Priorities List Sites: Arkansas.
  PB91-921212/CDH               See 0159
 EPA/9200.5-706
  National Priorities List Sites: California.
  PB91-921213/CDH               See 0162
 EPA/9200.5-707
  National Priorities List Sites: Colorado.
  PB91-921214/CDH               See 0165
 EPA/9200.5-708
  National Priorities List Sites: Connecticut.
  PB91-921215/CDH               See 0168
 EPA/9200.5-709
  National Priorities List Sites: Delaware.
  PB91-921216/CDH               See 0171
EPA/9200.5-710
  National Priorities List Sites: Florida.
  PB91 -921217/CDH               See 0174
EPA/9200.5-711
  National Priorities List Sites: Georgia.
  PB91-921218/CDH               See 0177
EPA/9200.5-712
  National Priorities List Sites: Hawaii.
  PB91 -921219/CDH               See 0180
EPA/9200.5-713

-------
                                                       NUMBER INDEX
                                                                       EPA/9240.0-03
EPA/9200.5-714
  National Priorities List Sites: Illinois.
  PB91-921221/CDH               See 0184
EPA/9200.5-715
  National Priorities List Sites: Indiana.
  PB91-921222/CDH               See 0187
EPA/9200.5-716
  National Priorities List Sites: Iowa.
  PB91-921223/CDH               See 0190
EPA/9200.5-717
  National Priorities List Sites: Kansas.
  PB91-921224/CDH               See 0193
EPA/9200.5-718
  National Priorities List Sites: Kentucky.
  PB91 -921225/CDH               See 0196
EPA/9200.5-719
  National Priorities List Sites: Louisiana.
  PB91 -921226/CDH               See 0199
EPA/9200.5-720
  National Priorities List Sites: Maine.
  PB91 -921227/GDH               See 0202
EPA/9200.5-721
  National Priorities List Sites: Maryland.
  PB91 -921228/CDH               See 0205
EPA/9200.5-722
  National Priorities List Sites: Massachusetts.
  PB91-921229/CDH               See 0208
EPA/9200.5-723
  National Priorities List Sites: Michigan.
  PB91-921230/CDH               See 0211
EPA/9200.5-724
  National Priorities List Sites: Minnesota.
  PB91-921231/CDH               See 0214
EPA/9200.5-725
  National Priorities List Sites: Mississippi.
  PB91-921232/CDH               See 0217
EPA/9200.5-726
  National Priorities List Sites: Missouri.
  PB91-921233/CDH               See 0220
EPA/9200.5-727
  National Priorities List Sites: Montana.
  PB91-921234/CDH               See 0223
EPA/9200.5-728
  National Priorities List Sites: Nebraska.
  PB91 -921236/CDH               See 0226
EPA/9200.5-729
  National Priorities List Sites:  New Hampshire.
  PB91-921237/CDH               See 0229
EPA/9200.5-730
  National Priorities List Sites: New Jersey.
  PB91-921235/CDH               See 0232
EPA/9200.5-731
  National Priorities List Sites: New Mexico.
  PB91-921238/CDH               See 0235
EPA/9200.5-732
  National Priorities List Sites: New York.
  PB91-921239/CDH               See 0238
EPA/9200.5-733
  National Priorities  List Sites:  North Carolina.
  PB91-921240/CDH               See 0243
EPA/9200.5-734
  National Priorities List Sites:  North and South
  Dakota.
  PB91 -921241 /CDH               See 0241
EPA/9200.5-735
  National Priorities List Sites: Ohio.
  PB91 -921242/CDH               See 0247
EPA/9200.5-736
  National Priorities List Sites: Oklahoma.
  PB91-921243/CDH                See 0250
EPA/9200.5-737
  National Priorities List Sites: Oregon.
  PB91 -921244/CDH               See 0253
EPA/9200.5-738
  National Priorities List Sites: Pennsylvania.
  PB91-921245/CDH               See 0256
EPA/9200.5-739
  National Priorities List Sites: Rhode Island.
  PB91 -921246/CDH               See 0262
EPA/9200.5-740
  National Priorities List Sites: South Carolina.
  PB91 -921247/CDH               See 0266
EPA/9200.5-741
  National Priorities List Sites: Tennessee.
  PB91-921248/CDH               See 0269
EPA/9200.5-742
  National Priorities List Sites: Texas.
  PB91-921249/CDH               See 0272
EPA/9200.5-743
  National Priorities List Sites: Utah.
  PB91-921250/CDH               See 0276
EPA/9200.5-744
  National Priorities List Sites: Vermont.
  PB91 -921251 /CDH               See 0279
EPA/9200.5-745
  National Priorities List Sites: Virginia.
  PB91-921252/CDH               See 0282
EPA/9200.5-746
  National Priorities List Sites: Washington.
  PB91-921253/CDH               See 0285
EPA/9200.5-747
  National Priorities List Sites: West Virginia.
  PB91-921254/CDH               See 0288
EPA/9200.5-748
  National Priorities List Sites: Wisconsin.
  PB91-921255/CDH               See 0291
EPA/9200.5-749
  National Priorities List Sites: Wyoming.
  PB91-921256/CDH               See 0294
EPA/9200.5-750
  National Priorities List Sites: American  Samoa,
  Guam and Trust Territories.
  PB91-921258/CDH               See 0155
EPA/9200.5-751
  National Priorities List Sites: Puerto Rico.
  PB91-921257/CDH               See 0259
EPA/9221.0-02A
  CERCLIS Data Handling Support Policy State-
  ment.
  PB90-258328/CDH               See 0013
EPA/9230.0-06
  Superfund Responsiveness Summaries (Super-
  fund Management Review: Recommendation
  Number 43E).
  PB90-273731/CDH               See 0125
EPA/9230.0-08
  Planning  for Sufficient Community  Relations
  (Superfund Management Review: No. 43A).
  PB90-249533/CDH               See 0108
EPA/9230.0-09
  Community  Relations: Use of Senior Environ-
  mental Employees  in  Superfund (Superfund
  Management    Review:    Recommendation
  43.K.L).
  PB90-273749/CDH               See 0088
EPA/9230.0-15
  Role of Community Interviews in the Develop-
  ment  of a Community  Relations Program  for
  Remedial Response.
  PB90-273756/CDH               See 0485
EPA/9230.0-19
  Proposed Method to Evaluate  the  Effective-
  ness of Community Involvement in Superfund
  (Superfund Management Review: Recommen-
  dation Number 43.A).
  PB90-273764/CDH                See 0109
EPA/9230.1-05/FS
  Superfund Technical Assistance Grants.
  PB90-273772/CDH                See 0502
EPA/9234.0-02
  CERCLA Compliance with Other Environmen-
  tal Statutes.
  PB91-214098/CDH                See 0404
EPA/9234.0-04
  Consideration of RCRA Requirements in Per-
  forming CERCLA Responses at Mining Waste
  Sites.
  PB91-214205/CDH                See 0420
EPA/9234.1-01
  CERCLA Compliance with Other Laws Manual.
  Part 1. Interim Final.
  PB90-272535/CDH                See 0409
EPA/9234.2-01/FS
  ARARs Q's and A's.
  PB90-273780/CDH                See 0398
EPA/9234.2-02/FS
  CERCLA Compliance with Other Laws Manual:
  Guide to Manual.
  PB90-274242/CDH                See 0407
EPA/9234.2-03/FS
  CERCLA Compliance with Other Laws Manual:
  Overview of ARARs - Focus on ARAR Waiv-
  ers.
  PB90-273798/CDH                See 0408
EPA/9234.2-04/FS
  CERCLA Compliance with Other Laws Manual:
  RCRA  ARARS-Focus  on   Closure  Require-
  ments.
  PB90-274259/CDH                See 0410
EPA/9234.2-05/FS
  CERCLA Compliance with Other Laws Manual:
  CERCLA Compliance with State Requirements.
  PB90-272543/CDH                See 0405
EPA/9234.2-06/FS
  CERCLA Compliance with Other Laws Manual:
  CERCLA   Compliance  with  the  CWA  and
  SDWA.
  PB90-273806/CDH                See 0406
EPA/9234.2-07/FS
  CERCLA Compliance with Other Laws Manual:
  Summary and Part 2. CAA, TSCA, and Other
  Statutes.
  PB90-272550/CDH                See 0411
EPA/9234.2-08/FS
  ARAR's Q's and A's. Compliance with the Tox-
  icity Characteristics Rule. Part 1.
  PB90-273814/CDH                See 0396
EPA/9234.2-09/FS
  ARARS Q's and A's: Compliance with Federal
  Water Quality Criteria.
  PB90-274267/CDH                See 0399
EPA/9234.2-11/FS
  ARARs Q's and A's: State Ground-Water Anti-
  degradation Issues.
  PB91-921311/CDH                See 0402
EPA/9240.0-03
  Superfund  Analytical Review and Oversight.
  PB90-249541/CDH                See 0995
                                                                                                                           NU-19

-------
    I!	I!'!!!"1
                       'llli  "SI*!'31 	W!	H	'(ME	I	!» ',
1 it J:i<:i ; i;1 -
";s i is : • I  Hi ..... :< "
                                               1 ''liif iIJSf I'
                                                                                                                      : 'Si"' If
                                                                                                                                    iliiilK!	«!1
 EPA/9240.0-04-1
           NUMBER INDEX
 EPA/9240.0-04-1
   Guidelines (or Effective Management of the
   Contract Laboratory Program.
   PBBO-272568/CDH               See 0027
 EPA/9240,0-05
   Dscentrallzatlon of Superfund  Bottle Reposi-
   tory Functions.
   PggO-249559/Cbli,;; ....... ',,^  \   '   See 0985
 EPA/9242.5-02
   Model Performanca Standards for Superfund
   Project Officers, Deputy Project Officers, and
   Work Assignment  Managers/Delivery  Order
   Officers.
   PB90-258336/CDH               See 0045
 EPA/9242.6-07
   Approval of  Long Term Contracting Strategy
   for   Superfund   (Superfund   Management
   Review: RocommendaOon E.2).
   FlB8b-273822/CDH               Seeoois
 EPA/9242.6-07/FS
   Long-Term Contracting Strategy for Superfund.
   PS9P.274275/CDH., ..... „,   •  • ......  .    -  See 0042
  Gufcte on Remedial Actions for Contaminated
  Ground Water.
  PB§r>272576/CDH                See 1461
EPA/9285.0-01
  OSWER Integrated  Health and Safety Policy.
  P880-25B344/CDH                See 0920
EPA/9285.1-01C
  Standard Operating Safety Guides.
 , Pg90-24S590/CDHrr ..... „  ..... ............ See P924
EPA/9285.2-02 ,   ".^ ...... ' .....  ' ...... ...... '.
  Field Standard  Operating Procedures for the
  Dggontaminatlori  of   Response   Personnel
  F.S.O,P, No. 7.
 , F|g1 f 1 3850/CDy ..... , ............. .......      See 0913 ,
EPA7928&2-03
  FtoW Standard  Operating Procedures for Air
  Surveiance F.S.O.P. No. 8.
  P891-213843/COH                See 0910
EPA79285.2-05
  FWd Standard Operating Procedures for Prep-
  aration of a Site Safety Plan F.S.O.P. No. 9.
  Enyironm«ntal Asbestos .Assessment Manual,
  Superfund Method for the Determination of As-
  bestos in Ambient Air. Part 1. Method.
  P|90-274283/CpH                See 1027
EPA/9285.5-02-2 ......................................
  Environmental A8bJst°s Assessment Manual.
  Sgperfund Method for the Determination of As-
  bisfos in Ambient AE Part 2. Technical Back-
  ground Document.
  PB80-274291/COH                See 1028
EPA/9285.7-01/FS
  Risk Assessment  Guidance  for Superfund.
  VoKim«  1. Human  Health Evaluation Manual.
  PartA,Aprt1990.
  P890-273830/CDH                See 1066
EPA/9285.7-05/FS
  G;ujdtno9 for .Data, ...... Useabfty in Risk Assess-

  Pl|i-|2i3i2/CDH                See 1030
EPA/9285,9-05
  Mandatory Training Requirements  for OCSs
  and RPMs.
  PB80-272S84/CDH               See 0104
 EPA/9285.9-06
  Mandatory Community Relations Training. Su-
  perfund Management Review Implementation
  Product (Recommendation: No. 43.P(i)).
  PB90-272592/CDH                See 0103
 EPA/9320.7-01/FS
  Revised Hazard Ranking System: An Improved
  Tool for Screening Superfund Sites.
  PB91-921307/CDH                See 0377
 EPA/9320.7-02/FS
  Revised Hazard  Ranking System: Qs and As.
  PB91-921305/CDH                See 0381
 EPA/9320.7-03/FS
  Revised Hazard  Ranking System: Background
  Information.
  PB91-921303/CDH                See 0378
 EPA/9320.7-04/FS
  Closing the NPL Book under the Original HRS.
  PB91-921302/CDH                See 0337
 EPA/9330.2-04
  Discharge of Wastewater from CERCLA Sites
  into PQTWS.
  PB9b-249616/CbH                See 0421
 EPA/9330.2-06
  CERCLA Off-Site Policy - Eligibility of Facilities
  in Assessment Monitoring.
  PB90-249632/CDH                See 0414
 EPA/9330.2-07
  Notification of Out-of-State Shipments of  Su-
  perfund Site Wastes.
  PB90-272618/CDH                See 0429
 EPA/9330.2-11
  CERCLA Site Discharges to POTWS Treatabil-
  ity Manual.
  PB91-921269/CDH                See 1577
 EPA/9330.2-12
  CERCLA Site Discharges to POTWS CERCLA
  Site Sampling Program: Detailed  Data Report.
  PB91-921270/CDH                See 1575
 EPA/9335.3-02/FS-2
  Guide  to  Developing  Superfund  Proposed
  Plans.
  PB90-273855/CDH                See 1099
 EPA/9347.0-01
  Interim RCRA/CERCLA Guidance  on  Non-
  Contiguous Sites and On-Site Management on
  Waste and Treatment Residue.
  PB90-274317/CDH                See 0427
 EPA/9347.1-02
  Policy for Superfund Compliance  with  the
  RCRA Land Disposal Restrictions.
  PB90-249640/CDH               See 0436
 EPA/9347.3-01/FS
  Superfund  LDR  Guide No.  1:  Overview of
  RCRA Land Disposal Restrictions (LDRs).
  PB90-274325/CDH               See 0440
EPA/9347.3-02/FS
  Superfund LDR Guide No.  2: Complying with
  the California List Restrictions under Land Dis-
  posal Restrictions (LDRs).
  PB90-274333/CDH               See 0441
EPA/9347.3-03/FS
  Superfund LDR Guide No. 3: Treatment Stand-
  ards  and  Minimum Technology Requirements
  under Land Disposal Restrictions (LDRS).
  PB90-274341/CDH               See 0442
EPA/9347.3-04/FS
  Superfund LDR Guide No.  4: Complying with
  the Hammer Restrictions under Land Disposal
  Restrictions (LDRs).
  PB90-274358/CDH               See 0443
                        EPA/9347.3-05/FS
                          Superfund  LDR  Guide No.  5:  Determining
                          When Land Disposal  Restrictions (LDRs) Are
                          'Applicable' to CERCLA Response Actions.
                          PB90-274366/CDH                See 0444
                        EPA/9347.3-06B/FS
                          Obtaining a Soil  and  Debris Treatability Vari-
                          ance for Removal  Actions. Superfund LDR
                          Guide No. 6B.
                          PB91-921310/CDH                See 0430
                        EPA/9347.3-08/FS
                          Compliance with Third Third Requirements
                          Under the LDRs.  Superfund LDR Guide No. 8.
                          PB91-921313/CDH                See 0418
                        EPA/9347.3-09/FS
                          Guide to Delisting of RCRA Wastes for Super-
                          fund Remedial Responses.
                          PB90-274374/CDH                See 0422
                        EPA/9347.3-11/FS
                          CERCLA Compliance  with  the RCRA  Toxicity
                          Characteristics (TC) Rule: Part 2.
                          PB91-921309/CDH                See 0412
                        EPA/9355.0-20
                          RJ/FS Improvements.
                          PB90-272642/CDH                See 1108
                        EPA/9355.0-25A
                          Use of Removal Approaches to Speed Up Re-
                          medial Action Projects.
                          PB90-274382/CDH                See 1140
                        EPA/9355.0-26
                          Advancing the Use of  Treatment Technologies
                          for Superfund Remedies.
                          PB90-272659/CDH                See 1191
                        EPA/9355.0-27/FS
                          Guide to Selecting  Superfund Remedial Ac-
                          tions.
                          PB90-273863/CDH                See 1100
                        EPA/9355.0-28
                          Control  of Air Emissions from Superfund Air
                          Strippers at  Superfund  Groundwater Sites.
                          PB90-272667/CDH                See 1399
                        EPA/9355.3-01/FS
                          Remedial Investigation: Site Characterization
                          and Treatability Studies.
                          PB90-274408/CDH                See 1106
                        EPA/9355.3-01/FS1
                          Getting Ready: Scoping the RI/FS.
                          PB90-274390/CDH                See 1092
                        EPA/9355.3-01/FS-3
                          Feasibility Study:  Development and Screening
                          of Remedial Action Alternatives.
                          PB90-274416/CDH                See 1089
                        EPA/9355.3-01/FS-4
                          Feasibility Study: Detailed Analysis of Remedi-
                          al Action Alternatives.
                          PB90-272675/CDH                See 1088
                        EPA/9355.3-05
                          RI/FS Improvements Follow-Up.
                          PB90-249657/CDH                See 1109
                        EPA/9355.3-11/FS
                          Streamlining the RI/FS for  CERCLA Municipal
                          Landfill Sites.
                          PB90-274424/CDH                See 1118
                         Streamlining the RI/FS for  CERCLA Municipal
                          Landfill Sites.
                          PB91 -921301 /CDH                See 1119
                        EPA/9355.4-01/FS
                         Guide on Remedial Actions at Superfund Sites
                         with PCS Contamination.
                          PB90-274432/CDH               See 1262
NU-20

-------
                                                       NUMBER INDEX
                                                                      OERR-9360.8-02
EPA/9355.4-03-VOL-2
  Evaluation of Ground-Water Extraction Reme-
  dies. Volume 2. Case Studies 1-19.
  PB90-274440/CDH               See 1446
EPA/9355.4-03-VOL-3
  Evaluation of Ground-Water Extraction Reme-
  dies. Volume 3. General Site Data: Data Base
  Reports.
  PB90-274457/CDH               See 1447
EPA/9355.5-01
  Guidance on Oversight of PRP Performed RD/
  RA.
  PB90-249707/CDH               See 1130
EPA/9355.5-01/FS
  ARCS Construction Contract Modification Pro-
  cedures.
  PB90-274515/CDH               See 0020
EPA/9355.5-02
  Guidance on Expediting Remedial Design and
  Remedial Action.
  PB90-273871 /CDH               See 1129
EPA/9355.5-02/FS
  Expediting Remedial Construction.
  PB90-272683/CDH               See 1127
EPA/9355.5-05/FS
  USAGE Preplaced and Rapid Response Con-
  tracts.
  PB90-273889/CDH               See 1139
EPA/9355.5-14/FS
  EPA/USACE  Payment Process:  Direct Cite/
  Revised Reimbursement Methods.
  PB90-273897/CDH               See 1126
EPA/9360.0-02C
  Removal Cost Management System: Version
  3.2.
  PB90-272691/CDH               See 1009
EPA/9360.0-12A
  Final Guidance on Implementation of the 'Con-
  sistency' Exemption to the Statutory Limits on
  Removal Actions.
  PB90-274465/CDH               See 1004
EPA/9360.0-12/FS
  Exemptions from the Statutory Limits on Re-
  moval Actions.
  PB91-921304/CDH               See 1002
EPA/9360.0-15
  Role of Expedited Response Actions under
  SARA.
  PB91-214221/CDH               See 1116
EPA/9360.0-21
  Emergency Response Notification System.
  PB90-249715/CDH               See 0927
EPA/9360.3-01
  Superfund Removal Procedures: Action Memo-
  randum Guidance.
  PB90-274473/CDH               See 1012
EPA/9360.4-01
  Quality  Assurance/Quality  Control  Guidance
  for Removal Activities: Sampling QA/QC Plan
  and Data Validation Procedures.
  PB90-274481/CDH               See 0993
EPA/9360.5-00
  Guidelines for the Cleanup of Clandestine Drug
  Laboratories.
  PB90-272709/CDH               See 1007
EPA/9360.6-05
  Superfund  Emergency Response Actions:  A
  Summary of  Federally  Funded  Removals.
  Fourth Annual Report - Fiscal Year 1989.
  PB91-921260/CDH               See 0314
EPA/9360.7-06
  Guidance for Federal Facilities on Release No-
  tification Requirements under CERCLA and
  SARA Title 111.
  PB93-963412/CDH               See 0898
EPA/9375.5-02A
  Revised Interim Final Guidance on Indian In-
  volvement in the Superfund Program.
  PB90-249723/CDH               See 0484
EPA/9375.5-04
  Involvement of  Superfund Program Managers
  in Superfund Response Agreement Audits.
  PB90-249731/CDH               See 0099
EPA/9375.5-04/FS
  Audits and the Superfund Program Manager.
  PB90-272717/CDH               See 0086
EPA/9375.5-08/FS
  Criminal Investigations and the Superfund Pro-
  gram.
  PB90-274499/CDH               See 0469
EPA/9375.5-09/FS
  CERCLA Waste Capacity Assurance.
  PB90-274507/CDH               See 0131
EPA/9375.5-10/FS
  Public Awareness Signs at  Superfund  Sites.
  PB91-921306/CDH               See 0481
EPA/9375.6-04
  Status of State Involvement in the Superfund
  Program, FY 80 to FY 89.
  PB90-272725/CDH         •      See 0114
EPA/9375.6-08
  Analysis of State  Superfund  Programs: 50-
  State Study.
  PB90-272733/CDH               See 0447
EPA/9380.0-27
  Guide  for  Conducting  Treatability  Studies
  under CERCLA.
  PB90-249772/CDH               See 1154
EPA/9380.3-01
  Treatability Studies Contractor Work Assign-
  ments.
  PB90-273962/CDH               See 0076
EPA/9380.3-02/FS
  Treatability Studies Under CERCLA: An Over-
  view.
  PB90-273970/CDH               See 1172
EPA/9380.3-04
  Analysis of Treatability Data for Soil and
  Debris:  Evaluation of Land Ban Impact on Use
  of Superfund Treatment Technologies.
  PB90-258476/CDH               See 1488
EPA/9380.4-01
  Use of  Office of Research and Development's
  Bioremediation Expertise in Superfund Remov-
  al Program.
  PB90-249798/CDH               See 1016
EPA/9387.5-03/FS
  Political Subdivision Involvement in Superfund.
  PB90-273954/CDH               See 0479
ER-8902
  Achieving Greater Consistency between Sub-
  jective and Objective Risks.
  PB90-229832/CDH               See 1017
ERLN-TT02
  Framework  for  Real-Time  Decision-Making:
  New Bedford Harbor Pilot Dredging Study.
  PB90-150822/CDH               See 1587
ERLN-1033
  Using the DNA Alkaline Unwinding Assay  to
  Detect  DNA Damage in Laboratory and Envi-
  ronmentally Exposed Cells and Tissues.
  PB90-245770/CDH               See 1368
ERLN-1090
  Development and Use of Site-Specific Chemi-
  cal and Biological Criteria for Assessing New
  Bedford Harbor Pilot Dredging Project.
  PB91-182329/CDH               See 1583
ERLN-1173
  Acid Volatile Sulfide Predicts the Acute Toxici-
  ty of Cadmium and Nickel in Sediments.
  PB93-222107/CDH               See 1572
ERLN-1197
  Application of 'Real-Time' Monitoring in Deci-
  sion Making: The New Bedford Harbor Pilot
  Dredging Project.
  PB94-130747/CDH               See 1574
ISBN-0-16-036223-7
  Inside  the Hotline: A  Compilation of 1991
  Monthly Hotline Reports.
  PB92-131390/CDH               See 0140
ISBN-0-16-036253-9
  Literature Survey of Innovative Technologies
  for Hazardous Waste Site Remediation, 1987-
  1991.
  PB93-105617/CDH               See 1281
ISBN-0-309-040868
  Tracking Toxic Substances at Industrial  Facili-
  ties: Engineering Mass Balance  versus Materi-
  als Accounting.
  PB92-223213/CDH               See 1362
MISC-91025
  Characterizing soils  for hazardous  waste site
  assessments.
  DE91014097/CDH               See 1495
MRI-3862-A
  Identification  of   SARA  (Superfund  Amend-
  ments and Reauthorization Act)  Compounds in
  Adipose Tissue.
  PB90-132564/CDH               See 1055
OERR-9200.6-02
  Superfund Docket Operations Manual for Rule-
  making Activities.
  PB91 -921349/CDH               See 0081
OERR-9240.0-04-1
  Guidelines  for Effective  Management of the
  Contract Laboratory Program. Part 1. Contract
  Award. Part 2. Contract Administration.
  PB90-191545/CDH               See 0028
OERR-9240.0-04-2
  Guidelines  for Effective  Management of the
  Contract Laboratory Program. Part 1. Contract
  Award. Part 2. Contract Administration.
  PB90-191545/CDH               See 0028
OERR-9246.0-05
  Guidance on  Site  Assessment Cooperative
  Agreements.
  PB92-224385/CDH               See 0475
OERR-9295.2-04
  EPA/U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Payment
  Process, Direct Cite/Revised Reimbursement
  Methods.
  PB91-921347/CDH               See 1125
OERR-9355.0-32
  Handbook: Responding to Discharges of Sink-
  ing Hazardous Substances.
  PB91-228346/CDH               See 1589
OERR-9360.8-02
  Oil Spill Prevention, Control, and Countermeas-
  ures Program. Task Force Report.
  PB91-213868/CDH               See 0932
                                                                                                                          NU-21

-------
               OERR-9360.8-03
                                                       NUMBER INDEX
IS! • i
               OERR-9380.8JJ3 ...........................
                 Exxon Vaidaz'ON Spin. A Report to the Presi-
                 dent
                 P891-213819/CDH               See 0928
               OERR-9380.3-03
                 Inventory  of  freitablty  Study  Vendors.
                 \M»njei.    .................
                 P891-228395/CDH               See 1171
               OHEA-C-073^   h™   II  '.",   ...... ,    "',„
                 r^tho^lojogy for Evaluating Potential  Carcino-
                 genicKy in Support of Reportabla Quantity Ad-
                 justments Pursuant to OERCLA Section 102.
                 P893-230027/CDH               See 1146
               ORNL/M-781 .................................... .................... ,
                 Suporfund Remedial Action Decision  Process:
                 Database (or Seiected FY87 Records of DeCl-
  qe89010163/COH               See 1136
ORNL-6479 [[[
  Evaluation of Cleanup Levels for Remedial
  Action  at CERCLA (Comprehensive  Environ-
  mcnial  Response, ..... Compensation and Liability
  Act) Sites Based on a Review of EPA  (Envi-
  ronmental Protection ..... Agency) Records of  De-
  cfgfofi. ..... '
  DE89007900/CpH ..........................   See 1245
OSWi,R-D-9842.2
  CERCLA  Implementation of Inspector Training
  Requirements for OSCs/RPMs at the  Interme-
  dltta Level (n STEP and First-Line Supervisors.
  PMH87021/CDH               See 0517
OSWER DIRECTIVE-9010.00
  ^sjuranc* ...... of  Hazardous .....  Waste ..... Capacity,
  Guidance to State Officials. Assistance in  Ful-
  filling the  Requirements of CERCLA 104(c)(9).
  PB91-214171/CDH               See 0129
OSlER-DIREQTIVE-9010.02
  Gut-ianca for Capacity Assurance Planning.
  Cipaqity Planning Pursuant  to CERCLA Sec-
  tion 104(cM9).
  PJ83-20S898/CDH .............. : ............. See 0137
Os5fER-blRlcTIVE-9-230.'H)3 ....................
  Cttizens' Guidance Manual for the Technical
  Asitotmooe Grant Program"! ....................
  PB92-101435/CDH               See 0463
  Soporfund Technical Assistance Grant  (TAG)
  Handbook.
  PB91-238592/CDH               See 0499
OSW;ER, P|R;E;CTIV&9234.1-p2
  ClRCLA ' (Comprehensive ....... Environmental  Re-
  sponsa, CompensaUgn and Liability Act) Com-
  pline*  Wttn" Other Laws Manual: Part 2.  Clean
  Air Act  and  Other Environmental Statutes  and
  Slata Requirements.
  PB1KM48461/CDH               See 0413
OSWER DIRECTIVE 9242.2-01B
  Emwaency Response Cleanup Services Con-
  tracts (ERGS). Users Manual.
  PB90-191966/CDH               See 0024
OSWER DIRECTIVE-9242.2-02
  Slf-Spadffc Contracting for Removals.
  PB91.215053/CDH               See 1011
OSWER DlRECTlVE-9242.3-07
  Implementation of the Decentralized Contrac-
  tor Performance  Evaluation and  Award  Fee
  Process for Selected Remedial  Program Con-
  <**?!«•
  Pl9i-gOS492/CDK ..... I"'   '„!"'  ,    '  See 0031
OSWJR P1RECTIVE-9242.6J)1
  ARCS  Work Assignment  Management: Reid
         "
                                 See 0021
                 Fg91-2i49§5/COH t
OSWER DIRECTIVE-9242.6-02
  Guidance for Organizing ARCS Contract Files.
  PB91-215020/CDH               See 0025
OSWER DIRECTIVE-9242.6-04
  OERR  Organizational  Conflict  of  Interest
  Review  and Approval Program  (Superfund
  Management Review: Recommendation No.
  46CJ.
  PB91-214957/CDH               See 0046
OSWER DIRECTIVE-9275.2-01
  Superfund Remedial  Program  Financial Man-
  agement Authority, Responsibilities and Proce-
  dures.
  PB91-214106/CDH               See 1137
OSWER DIRECTIVE-9285.2-02
  Field Standard  Operating  Procedures for the
  Decontamination  of  Response   Personnel
  F.S.O.P. No. 7.
  PB91-213850/CbH               See 0913
OSWER DIRECTIVE-9285.2-03
  Field Standard  Operating  Procedures  for Air
  Surveillance F.S.O.P. No. 8.
  PB91-213843/CDH               See 0910
OSWER DIRECTIVE-9285.2-04
  Field Standard  Operating  Procedures for Es-
  tablishing Work Zones (F.S.O.P. 6).
  PB91-213827/CDH               See 0911
OSWER DIRECTIVE-9285.2-05
  Field Standard Operating Procedures for Prep-
  aration of a Site Safety Plan F.S.O.P. No.  9.
  PB91-213835/CDH               See 0912
OSWER DIRECTIVE-9285.3-05
  Hazmat Team Planning Guidance.
  PB90-274523/CDH               See 0915
OSWER DIRECTIVE-9285.4-02
  Guidance for Coordinating ATSDR Health As-
  sessment Activities with the Superfund Reme-
  dial Process.
  PB91-214080/CDH               See 1029
OSWER D1RECTIVE-9330.2-05
  CERCLA  Off-Site  Policy: Providing Notice  to
  Facilities.
  PB90-249624/CDH               See 0415
OSWER DIRECTIVE-9330.2-07FS
  Summary of 'Notification of Out-of-State Ship-
  ments of Superfund Site Wastes'.
  PB91-228197/CDH               See 0438
OSWER DIRECTIVE-9347.2-01
  Land Disposal  Restrictions as Relevant and
  Appropriate  Requirements for  CERCLA Con-
  taminated Soil and Debris.
  PB91-214973/CDH               See 0428
OSWER DIRECTIVE09355.3-06
  RI/FS Streamlining.
  PB91-214981/CDH               See 1110
OSWER DIRECTIVE-9355.3-11
  Conducting Remedial Investigations/Feasibility
  Studies for CERCLA Municipal Landfill Sites.
  PB91-921205/CDH               See 1084
OSWER DIRECTIVE-9355.4-01
  Guidance on Remedial Actions for Superfund
  Sites with PCB Contamination.
  PB91-921206/CDH               See 1261
OSWER DlRECTIVE-9355.4-03
  Considerations in  Ground  Water  Remediation
  at Superfund Sites.
  PB91-238584/CDH               See 1436
OSWER DIRECT(Vlf-936Q,p-08
  CERCLA  Removal Actions at Methane Re-
  lease Sites.
  PB91-190850/CDH               See 0416
OSWER DIRECTIVE-9360.7-01
  Reporting Requirements for  Continuous Re-
  leases of Hazardous Substances: A Guide for
  Facilities and Vessels on Compliance.
  PB91 -167593/CDH               See 1150
OSWER DIRECTIVE-9360.7-03
  Continuous Release-Emergency Response No-
  tification  System  and  Priority  Assessment
  Model: Model Documentation.
  PB91-168468/CDH               See 1143
OSWER DIRECTIVE-9360.7-04
  Assessing Reports of Continuous Releases of
  Hazardous Substances: A Guide for EPA Re-
  gions.
  PB91-921315/CDH               See 1142
OSWER DIRECTIVE-9360.7-05
  Continuous Release-Emergency Response No-
  tification  System  and  Priority  Assessment
  Model: User's Manual for EPA Regions.
  PB91-168450/CDH               See 1144
OSWER DIRECTIVE-9375.6-09
  Enhancing State Superfund Capabilities: Nine-
  State Study.
  PB91-242362/CDH               See 0471
OSWER DIRECTIVE-9380.3-10
  Guide  for  Conducting  Treatability  Studies
  under CERCLA.
  PB93-126787/CDH               See 1155
OSWER DIRECTIVE-9800.0
  Superfund Enforcement  Strategy  and Imple-
  mentation Plan.
  PB91-138842/CDH               See 0883
OSWER DIRECTIVE-9829.0
  Policy for Enforcement Actions against Trans-
  porters under CERCLA.
  PB91 -138859/CDH               See 0584
OSWER DIRECTIVE-9829.2
  Entry and Continued Access  under CERCLA.
  PB91-138867/CDH               See 0534
OSWER DIRECTIVE-9830.2
  Regional Oversight of  Federal Facility Clean-
  ups under CERCLA.
  PB91-138875/CDH               See 0900
OSWER DIRECTIVE-9831.2
  Reporting and  Exchange of  Information  on
  State Enforcement Actions at National Prior-
  ities List Sites.
  PB91-138883/CDH               See 0483
OSWER DIRECTIVE-9831.4
  Funding of State Enforcement Related Activi-
  ties.
  PB91 -138891 /CDH               See 0474
OSWER DIRECTIVE-9831.5
  Authority to  Use CERCLA to Provide Enforce-
  ment Funding Assistance to States.
  PB91-138909/CDH               See 0450
OSWER DIRECTIVE-9831.6A-6D
  Interim  Final Guidance Package on  Funding
  CERCLA State Enforcement  Actions at NPL
  Sites.
  PB91-138917/CDH               See 0477
OSWER DIRECTIVE-9831.7
  Supporting State Attorneys General  CERCLA
  Remedial  and  Enforcement Activities at NPL
  Sites.
  PB91-138925/CDH               See 0506
OSWER DIRECTIVE-9831.8
  Counting State-Lead Enforcement NPL Sites
  Toward the CERCLA Section  116(e) Remedial
  Action Start Mandate.
  PB91-138933/CDH               See 0468

-------
                                                       NUMBER INDEX
                                                          OSWER DIRECTIVE-9835.2
OSWER DIRECTIVE-9831.9
  Questions and Answers About the State Role
  in  Remedy Selection  at Non-Fund-Financed
  Enforcement Sites.
  PB91-187039/CDH               See 0482
OSWER DIRECTIVE-9832.0
  Cost Recovery Referrals.
  PB91 -138941 /CDH               See 0525
OSWER DIRECTIVE-9832.0-1A
  Procedures   for   Documenting   Costs   for
  CERCLA Section 107 Actions.
  PB91-138958/CDH               See 0590
OSWER DIRECTIVE-9832.1
  Cost Recovery Actions under CERGLA.
  PB91 -138966/CDH               See 0524
OSWER DIRECTIVE-9832.2
  Coordination of EPA and State Actions in Cost
  Recovery.
  PB91-138974/CDH               See 0522
OSWER DIRECTIVE-9832.3-1A
  Cost Recovery Actions/Statute of Limitations.
  PB91-138982/CDH               See 0523
OSWER DIRECTIVE-9832.5
  Policy on Recovering Indirect Cost in CERCLA
  Section 107 Cost Recovery Actions.
  PB91-138990/CDH               See 0585
OSWER DIRECTIVE-9832.6
  Small Cost Recovery Referrals.
  PB91-139006/CDH               See 0869
OSWER DIRECTIVE-9832.7
  Guidance  Regarding  CERCLA  Enforcement
  against Bankrupt Parties.
  PB91-139014/CDH               See 0556
OSWER DIRECTIVE-9832.7-1A
  Revised  Hazardous Waste Bankruptcy Guid-
  ance.
  PB91-139022/CDH               See 0598
OSWER DIRECTIVE-9832.8
  Revised  Hazardous Waste Bankruptcy Guid-
  ance, October 7, 1991.
  PB92-105485/CDH               See 0599
OSWER DIRECTIVE-9832.10
  Liability of  Corporate Shareholders and Suc-
  cessor Corporations  for Abandoned  Sites
  Under the Comprehensive Environmental Re-
  sponse, Compensation and Liability Act.
  PB91-139030/CDH               See 0570
OSWER DIRECTIVE-9832.11
  Guidance  on Documenting Decisions Not to
  Take Cost Recovery Actions.
  PB91-139048/CDH               See 0549
OSWER DIRECTIVE-9832.12
  Guidance on Federal Superfund Liens.
  PB91-139055/CDH               See 0551
OSWER DIRECTIVE-9832.13
  Superfund Cost Recovery Strategy.
  PB91-139063/CDH               See 0882
OSWER DIRECTIVE-9832.17
  Arbitration  Procedures  for Small Superfund
  Cost Recovery Claims.
  PB92-102045/CDH               See 0512
OSWER DIRECTIVE-9832.18
  Written Demand for CERCLA Cost Recovery.
  PB91-204628/CDH               See 0894
OSWER DIRECTIVE-9833.0-1A
  Guidance on CERCLA 106(a) Unilateral Admin-
  istrative Orders for Remedial Designs and Re-
  medial Actions.
  PB91-139089/CDH               See 0548
OSWER DIRECTIVE-9833.0-1A-FS
  Summary of 'Guidance on  CERCLA Section
  106(a) UAOs for RD/RA'.
  PB91-228312/CDH               See 0873
OSWER DIRECTIVE-9833.0-2B
  Model Unilateral Order for  Remedial  Design
  and Remedial Action.
  PB91-139097/CDH               See 0580
OSWER DIRECTIVE-9833.0-2C
  Evaluation of, and Additional Guidance on, Is-
  suance  of  Unilateral Administrative  Orders
  (UAOs) for RD/RA.
  PB91 -201764/CDH               See 0538
OSWER DIRECTIVE-9833.1
  Issuance of Administrative Orders for Immedi-
  ate Removal Actions.
  PB91 -139105/CDH               See 0567
OSWER DIRECTIVE-9833.2
  Consent Orders and the Reimbursement Provi-
  sion Under Section 106(b) of CERCLA.
  PB91 -139113/CDH               See 0520
OSWER DIRECTIVE-9833.3A-1
  Final Guidance  on Administrative Records for
  Selecting CERCLA Response Actions.
  PB91 -139121 /CDH               See 0473
OSWER DIRECTIVE-9834.0
  Releasing Identities of Potentially Responsible
  Parties in Response to FOIA Requests.
  PB91 -139147/CDH               See 0594
OSWER DIRECTIVE-9834.2
  Timely   Initiation   of  Responsible   Party
  Searches, Issuance of Notice Letters, and Re-
  lease of  Information (Attachment XXII).
  PB92-102060/CDH               See 0886
OSWER DIRECTIVE-9834.3-2A
  PRP Search Supplemental Guidance for Sites
  in the Superfund Remedial  Program.
  PB91 -139162/CDH               See 0592
OSWER DIRECTIVE-9834.3-2A-FS
  Summary of 'PRP Search  Supplemental Guid-
  ance for Sites in the Superfund Remedial Pro-
  gram'.
  PB91-228320/CDH               See 0879
OSWER DIRECTIVE-9834.4A
  Transmittal of Guidance on Use and Enforce-
  ment of CERCLA  Information  Requests  and
  Administrative Subpoenas.
  PB91 -139170/CDH               See 0887
OSWER DIRECTIVE-9834.5
  Procedural Guidance on Treatment of Insurers
  under CERCLA.
  PB91 -139188/CDH               See 0589
OSWER DIRECTIVE-9834.6
  Policy Towards Owners of Residential Property
  at Superfund Sites.
  PB91-205476/CDH               See 0586
OSWER DIRECTIVE-9834.7
  Interim Guidance on Settlements with De Mini-
  mis Waste Contributors under Section 122(g)
  of SARA.
  PB91-139196/CDH               See 0562
OSWER DIRECTIVE-9834.7-1A
  Interim Model CERCLA Section  122(g) (4) De
  Minimis  Waste  Contributor  Consent Decree
  and Administrative Order on Consent.
  PB91 -139204/CDH               See 0565
OSWER DIRECTIVE-9834.7-1B
  Methodologies for Implementation of CERCLA
  Section 122(g) (1) (A) De Minimis Waste Con-
  tributor  Settlements  Proposals  and  Agree-
  ments.
  PB91 -139212/CDH               See 0572
OSWER DIRECTIVE-9834.7-1B-FS
  Summary of 'Methodologies for Implementa-
  tion of CERCLA Section 122(g)(1)(a) De Mini-
  mis Waste Contributor Settlements'.
  PB91-227959/CDH               See 0878
OSWER DIRECTIVE-9834.8
  Covenants Not to Sue under SARA.
  PB91-139220/CDH               See 0526
OSWER DIRECTIVE-9834.9
  Evaluating Mixed Funding  Settlements under
  CERCLA.
  PB91 -139238/CDH               See 0537
OSWER DIRECTIVE-9834.9A
  Interim Policy on Mixed Funding Settlements
  Involving the Preauthorization of States or Po-
  litical Subdivisions.
  PB91-139246/CDH               See 0566
OSWER DIRECTIVE-9834.10
  Interim Guidance on Notice Letters, Negotia-
  tions, and Information Exchange.
  PB91-139253/CDH               See 0560
OSWER DIRECTIVE-9834.10-1A
  Waiver of Headquarters Approval for Issuance
  of RD/RA Special Notice Letters at the Time
  of ROD Signature from OERR and OWPE.
  PB91 -139261 /CDH               See 0893
OSWER DIRECTIVE-9834.10-1B
  Model Notice Letters.
  PB91 -139279/CDH               See 0577
OSWER DIRECTIVE-9834.11
  Revised  Procedures for Implementing Off-Site
  Response Actions.
  PB91-139287/CDH               See 0601
OSWER DIRECTIVE-9834.11 A
  Off-Site Policy: RFA or Equivalent Investigation
  Requirement at RCRA  Treatment and Storage
  Facilities.
  PB91-139295/CDH               See 0431
OSWER DIRECTIVE-9834.13
  Municipal Settlements.
  PB91 -139311 /CDH               See 0583
OSWER  DIRECTIVE-9834.13-FS
  Summary of  'Interim Policy on CERCLA Settle-
  ments Involving  Municipalities  and Municipal
  Wastes'.
  PB91-228262/CDH               See 0877
OSWER  DIRECTIVE-9834.14
  Transmittal  of  Model  Consent Decree for
  CERCLA Section 104(e) Information Request
  Enforcement Actions.
  PB91 -193417/CDH               See 0888
OSWER  DIRECTIVE-9834.16
  Model  Informational Notice Letter to Local
  Governments.
  PB91 -187013/CDH               See 0575
OSWER  DIRECTIVE-9835.0
  Interim CERCLA Settlement Policy.
  PB91-139329/CDH               See 0559
OSWER  DIRECTIVE-9835.1A
  Interim Guidance on  Potentially Responsible
  Party Participation in  Remedial  Investigations
  and Feasibility Studies.
  PB91-139337/CDH               See 0561
OSWER  DIRECTIVE-9835.2
  Guidance on Drafting Consent Decrees in Haz-
  ardous Waste Cases.
  PB91-139345/CDH               See 0550
                                                                                                                         NU-23

-------
               OSWER DIRECTIVE-9835.2A
               OSWER DIRECT IVE-9835.2A
                 Rljfjslons to,th8jntg£jm, Guidance on PRP Par-
               "  Bepatlpn In Remedial Investigations and Feasi-
                 bility Studies.
                 PBSl-139352/CDH               See 0603
                 Guidance of the Use of Stipulated Penalties in
                 Hazardous Waste Consent Decrees.
                 PBS1-139360/COH               See 0544
               OSWER plRECT)VE-9i3S.3:1A    ........ „
                ,A|iynj§tfatiy« Order, on Consent for Remedial
                 Investigations/Feasibility Study.
                 PB9M39378/CDH               Se e 0510
               OSWER DIRECT1VE-9835.3-2A
                 Suppterrtental Guidance  on Performing Risk
                 A«$owinwnts in Remedial Investigation/Feasi-
                 bSty Studies (RI/FSs). Conducted by Potential-
                 ly Responsibla Parties (PRPs).
                 PB91-20S526/CDH               See 1078
               OSWER DIRECT1VE-9835.4
                 Interim  Guidance: Streamlining the CERCLA
                 Settlement Decision Process.
                 PB91-139386/CDH               See 0563
               OSWER DIRECTIVE-9835.4-2A
                 Initiation of PRP-Flnanced Remedial Design in
                 Advance of Consent Decree Entry (Rnal).
                 PgJJ.}3Jf384fCOfl ...................... .....    See 055,7
               OSWER DIRECTIVE-9835.5
                 EPA  Iritorim Guidance on Indemnification of
                 Suportund Response Action Contractors Under
                 Section 119 of SARA.
                 PB91-139402/CDH               See 0536
               OSWER DIRECTIVE-9835.6
                         on Premium Payments in CERCLA
                Statements.
                                  , „   , ..... „ ..... u   ,  ...... See 0553
               OSWER DIRECTIVE-9835.7
                 Gukiano* on CERCLA Secflon 1 06 Judicial Ac-
                 tions.
                 PB91-139428/CDH                See 0546
               OSWER pIRECTlVE-f 835.8
                 MoArf Statement of Work for a Remedial  In-
                 vestigation and Feasibility Study Conducted by
                 Potentially Responsible Parties.
                 PS9I-139436/CDH                See 0578
               OSWER D1RECTIVE-9835.9FS
                 Summary of 'Guidance of Landowner Liability
                 undtr Section 107(a}1 of CERCLA, De Minimjs
                 Selemflnts  wider  Section   122(g)(1)(b)  of
                 CEHCLA, and Settlements with Prospective
                 Purchasers of Contaminated. Property'.
                 PB81.228288/COH                See 0872
                MooX  itigation Report for CERCLA Sections
                106 and 107 and RCRA Section 7003.
                re91-138451/CDH                See 0576
              OSWER DIRECtlVE-9i35.i2
                Rfiftaslng Information to Potentially Responsi-
                W» Parties at CERCLA Sitei"
                P8$i-139469/CDH                See 0595
              OSWER DIRECTIVE-9835.12FS
                Summary of 'Releasing Information to Poten-
                Mjiy Responsible Parties at CERCLA Sites'.
                                 .          .
              OSWER DIRECTIVE-9835.13
                Comparative Analysts of Remedies Selected in
                the Superfund Program during FY  87, FY 88
                and FX 89.
           NUMBER INDEX
 OSWER DIRECTIVE-9835.14
  Submitted of Ten-Point Settlement Analyses for
  CERCLA Consent Decrees.
  PB91-139485/CDH                See 0871
 OSWER D1RECTIVE-9835.15
  Performance of Risk Assessments in Remedial
  Investigation/Feasibility Studies (RI/FSs) Con-
  ducted  by  Potentially  Responsible  Parties
  (PRPs).
  PB91-139493/CDH                See 1102
 OSWER DIRECTIVE-9835.15A
  Supplemental Guidance on  Performing Risk
  Assessments in  Remedial Investigation/Feasi-
  bility Studies (RI/FSs). Conducted by Potential-
  ly Responsible Parties (PRPs).
  PB91-205526/CDH                See 1078
 OSWER DIRECTIVE-9835.17
  United   States   Environmental   Protection
  Agency  Model  CERCLA  RD/RA Consent
  Decree.
  PB91-201673/CDH                See 0890
 OSWER DIRECTIVE-9836.0-1A
  Community Relations during Enforcement  Ac-
  tivities and Development of the Administrative
  Record.
  PB91 -139519/CDH                See 0465
  Community Relations during Enforcement  Ac-
 • tivities and Development of the Administrative
  Record.
  PB92-105469/CDH                See 0466
 OSWER DIRECTIVE-9836.2
  CERCLA Community Relations Mailing Lists.
  PB91-139527/CDH                See 0451
 OSWER DIRECTIVE-9837.1
  Preparation of Hazardous Waste Referrals.
  PB91-139543/CDH                See 0588
 OSWER-DIRECTIVE-9837.2
  Enforcement Project  Management  Handbook.
  PB90-780115/CDH                See 0531
 OSWER-DIRECTIVE-9837.2-A
  Enforcement Project  Management  Handbook.
  PB91-186999/CDH                See 0532
 OSWER DIRECTIVE-9838.1
  Scope of  the CERCLA Petroleum  Exclusion
  under Sections 101(14) and 104(a)(2).
  PB91-139550/CDH                See 0605
 OSWER D1RECTIVE-9839.1
  Interim  Guidelines for  Preparing  Nonbinding
  Preliminary Allocations of Responsibility.
  PB92-102078/CDH                See 0564
 OSWER DIRECTIVE-9840.3
  Site Classification Changes from Enforcement
  to Fund Lead.
  PB9i-13960"b/CDH               See 0606
 OSWER DIRECTIVE-9841.1A
  Administrative Penalty Procedures.
  PB92-101963/CDH               See 0511
 OSWER DIRECTIVE-9842.0
  Guidance on Applicability of EPA Order 3500.1
  to CERCLA Staff.
  PB91-139642/CDH               See 0545
OSWER DIRECTIVE-9842.1
  CERCLA Implementation of the Training Re-
  quirements of EPA  Order  3500.1.  Inspector
  Training.
  PB91-139659/CDH               See 0518
OSWER DIRECTIVE-9843.0
  Revised  EPA Guidance on Parallel Proceed-
                Coniiuttatior  on Records of Decision (RODS)
                lot Containment-Only Remedies.
                PB91-228734/CDH               See 0521
  PB91-139667/CDH               See 0597
OSWER DIRECT!VE-9850.0-1
  Endangerment Assessment Guidance.
  PB91-139675/CDH               See 0527
OSWER DIRECTIVE-9850.1
  Endangerment Assessment Handbook.
  PB91-139683/CDH               See 0529
OSWER DIRECTIVE-9850.4
  Interim Guidance for Soil Ingestion Rates.
  PB91-139709/CDH               See 1057
OSWER DIRECTIVE-9851.3
  Integrated  Timeline  for Superfund  Site Man-
  agement (SMR 5,15).
  PB91-139717/CDH               See 0098
OSWER DIRECTIVE-9870.1A
  Use  of CERCLA Section 106  Unilateral En-
  forcement for Remedial Design  and Remedial
  Action: Strategy for Fiscal Year 1990.
  PB91-139733/CDH               See 0891
OSWER DIRECTIVE-9871.0
  Roles and Responsibilities of Deputy Project
  Officers  and Work Assignment  Managers
  under the  Technical  Enforcement  Support
  (TES) Contracts.
  PB91 -139741 /CDH               See 0069
OSWER DIRECTIVE-9871.0-1A
  Roles and  Responsibilities of Regional Project
  Officers and Headquarters Zone Project  Offi-
  cers  for Management of TES (TES 5) Con-
  tracts.
  PB91-139758/CDH               See 0604
OSWER DIRECTIVE-9891.1
  Expanded Civil Judicial Referral Procedures.
  PB91-139766/CDH               See 0539
OSWER DIRECTIVE-9891.1-1A
  Procedures  for Transmittal  of  CERCLA  and
  RCRA Civil Judicial  Enforcement Case Pack-
  ages to Headquarters.
  PB91 -139774/CDH               See 0591
OSWER DIRIECTIVE-9891.3
  Final EPA Policy on the Inclusion of Environ-
  mental Auditing Provisions in Enforcement Set-
  tlements.
  PB92-102094/CDH               See 0541
OSWER DIRECTIVE-9891.5A
  Expansion  of Direct  Referral of  Cases to the
  Department of Justice.
  PB91-139790/CDH               See 0540
OSWER DIRECTIVE-9891.6
  Multi-Media   Settlements  of   Enforcement
  Claims.
  PB91-139808/CDH               See 0581
  Multi-Media   Settlements  of   Enforcement
  Claims.
  PB92-102136/CDH               See 0582
OSWER DIRECT!VE-9932.1
  Guidance for Environmental Priorities Initiative
  (EPI) Facilities in the Superfund  Pre-Remedial
  Program.
  PB91 -139980/CDH               See 0341
OSWER DIRECTIVE-9940.1
  Issuance of Administrative Orders Under Sec-
  tion 3013 of the Resource Conservation  and
  Recovery Act.
  PB91-140111/CDH               See 0568
OSWER DIRECT!VE-9940.2
  Issuance of Final Revised Guidance  on the
  Use  and  Issuance  of  Administrative Orders
  Under Section 7003  of the Resource Conser-
  vation and Recovery  Act (RCRA).
  PB91 -140129/CDH               See 0569
OSWER DIRECTIVE-9951.1
  Transmittal of the Final  Waste Oil Interim En-
  forcement Guidance Document.
  PB91-140202/CDH               See 0889
™i!

-------
                                                       NUMBER INDEX
                                                                  OSWER-9200.5-715A
OSWER-9200.0-14-1
  Superfund Administrative Improvements. Exec-
  utive Summary.
  PB93-963294/CDH                See 0310
OSWER-9200.0-15FS
  Superfund Administrative Improvements:  Rein-
  venting Superfund.
  PB94-963210/CDH                See 0312
OSWER-9200.1-09I-VOL-1-NO-1
  Superfund  Policy Forum  Update,  Volume 1,
  Number 1, February 1992.
  PB92-963262/CDH                See 0324
OSWER-9200.1-11
  Accessing the $50 Million Set-Aside in the Re-
  medial  Action Budget for Quick Response at
  National Priorities List Sites.
  PB92-963342/CDH                See 1082
OSWER-9200.1-12
  Superfund Progress, Spring 1992.
  PB92-963265/CDH                See 0329
OSWER-9200.1-12-2
  Superfund Progress, Summer 1992.
  PB92-963279/CDH                See 0330
OSWER-9200.1-12-3
  Superfund Progress: Fall/Winter 1992.
  PB93-963254/CDH                See 0328
OSWER-9200.1-12B
  Superfund  Progress - Aficionado's Version:
  Progress as of June 30,1992.
  PB92-963278/CDH                See 0325
OSWER-9200.1-12C
  Superfund   Progress.  Aficionado's  Version.
  Progress as of September 30,1992.
  PB93-963255/CDH                See 0327
OSWER-9200.1-14
  Superfund  Reauthorization: NACEPT Subcom-
  mittee Handbook.
  PB93-963298/CDH                See 0331
OSWER-9200.2-13
 . Progress   Toward  Implementing  Superfund,
  Fiscal Year 1990: A Report  to the Congress.
  PB92-963256/CDH                See 0301
OSWER-9200.2-14
  National Oil and Hazardous Substances Pollu-
  tion Contingency Plan (The NCP).
  PB92-963261 /CDH                See 0146
OSWER-9200.2-15FS
  Overview of the Outyear Liability Model  (OLM).
  PB93-963259/CDH                See 0106
OSWER-9200.2-16FS
  Quality Assurance for Superfund Environmen-
  tal Data Collection Activities.
  PB93-963273/CDH               See 0991
OSWER-9200.2-17
  Progress   Toward  Implementing  Superfund,
  Fiscal Year 1991. Report to Congress.
  PB94-963234/CDH               See 0302
OSWER-9200.2-19A
  Superfund Strategic  Plan and  Implementation
  Strategy Fiscal Year 1994.
  PB94-963245/CDH               See 0126
OSWER-9200.2-19B
  Superfund Strategic  Plan and  Implementation
  Strategy Fiscal Year 1994: Office and Division
  Plans.
  PB94-963246/CDH               See 0127
OSWER-9200.2-20FS
  Overview of the Outyear Liability Model (OLM).
  PB94-963215/CDH               See 0107
OSWER-9200.3-01H-3
  Highlights:  Superfund  Program Management.
  Fiscal Year 1993.
  PB93-963261/CDH                See 0095
OSWER-9200.3-11
  Final Policy on Setting RI/FS Priorities.
  PB91-921324/CDH                See 1090
OSWER-9200.3-14-1
  Superfund  Program Implementation Manual,
  Fiscal Year 1994. Volume 1.  Program Goals
  and  Planning  Requirements. Volume 2. Pro-
  gram Implementation Procedures.
  PB94-963220/CDH                See 0124
OSWER-9200.3-14-2
  Superfund   Program  Management  Manual,
  Fiscal Year 1994.
  PB94-963247/CDH                See 0073
OSWER-9200.3-15I-VOL-1-NO-1
  Superfund  Program and Information Manage-
  ment Update. Volume 1, Number 1, November
  1993.
  PB94-963208/CDH                See 0123
OSWER-9200.5-01B
  Superfund  Program: Ten Years of Progress.
  PB91-921286/CDH                See 0977
OSWER-9200.5-105
  Understanding  Oil  Spills  and Oil  Spill Re-
  sponse.
  PB93-963409/CDH                See 0978
OSWER-9200.5-1151
  OPA Update: Implementation of the Oil  Pollu-
  tion Act of 1990. Volume 2, Number 1.
  PB92-963420/CDH                See 0934
OSWER-9200.5-115I-VOL-1-NO-1
  Update on Implementation of the Oil Pollution
  Act of 1990. Volume  1, Number 1, February
  1991.
  PB91 -921370/CDH                See 0936
OSWER-9200.5-115I-VOL-1-NO-2
  Update on Implementation of the Oil Pollution
  Act of 1990. Volume 1, Number 2, April  1991.
  PB91-921371/CDH                See 0937
OSWER-9200.5-115I-VOL-1-NO-3
  Update on Implementation of the Oil Pollution
  Act of 1990. Volume 1, Number 3, June 1991.
  PB91-921372/CDH                See 0938
OSWER-9200.5-208FS-A
  Debarment and Suspension.
  PB92-963331/CDH                See 0470
OSWER-9200.5-402A
  Contracting and  Subcontracting Guide to the
  Superfund Program.
  PB92-963274/CDH               See 0023
OSWER-9200.5-701A
  Superfund:  Focusing on the Nation  at Large.
  1991 Update.
  PB92-963252/CDH               See 0323
OSWER-9200.5-702A
  National Priorities List Sites: Alabama.
  PB92-963223/CDH               See 0149
OSWER-9200.5-702B
  National Priorities List Sites:  Alabama,  1992.
  PB93-963201                     See 0150
OSWER-9200.5-703A
  National Priorities List Sites: Alaska.
  PB92-963251/CDH                See 0152
OSWER-9200.5-703B
  National Priorities List Sites: Alaska, 1992.
  PB93-963202/CDH                See 0153
OSWER-9200.5-704A
  National  Priorities  List  Sites: Arizona  and
  Nevada.
  PB92-963216/CDH                See 0157
OSWER-9200.5-704B
  National  Priorities  List  Sites: Arizona  and
  Nevada, 1992.
  PB93-963204/CDH                See 0158
OSWER-9200.5-705A
  National Priorities List Sites: Arkansas.
  PB92-963220/CDH                See 0160
OSWER-9200.5-705B
  National Priorities List Sites: Arkansas, 1992.
  PB93-963205/CDH                See 0161
OSWER-9200.5-706A
  National  Priorities List Sites: California  and
  Hawaii.
  PB92-963239/CDH                See 0163
OSWER-9200.5-706B
  National  Priorities List Sites: California  and
  Hawaii, 1992.
  PB93-963206/CDH                See 0164
OSWER-9200.5-707A
  National Priorities List Sites: Colorado.
  PB92-963237/CDH                See 0166
OSWER-9200.5-707B
  National Priorities List Sites: Colorado, 1992.
  PB93-963207/CDH                See 0167
OSWER-9200.5-708A
  National Priorities List Sites: Connecticut.
  PB92-963203                     See 0169
OSWER-9200.5-708B
  National  Priorities  List  Sites:   Connecticut,
  1992.
  PB93-963208/CDH                See 0170
OSWER-9200.5-709A
  National Priorities List Sites: Delaware.
  PB92-963228/CDH                See 0172
OSWER-9200.5-709B
  National Priorities List Sites: Delaware,  1992.
  PB93-963209/CDH                See 0173
OSWER-9200.5-710A
  National Priorities List Sites:  Florida.
  PB92-963250/CDH                See 0175
OSWER-9200.5-710B
  National Priorities List Sites:  Florida, 1992.
  PB93-963210/CDH                See 0176
OSWER-9200.5-711A
  National Priorities List Sites:  Georgia.
  PB92-963226/CDH                See 0178
OSWER-9200.5-711B
  National Priorities List Sites:  Georgia, 1992.
  PB93-963211 /CDH                See 0179
OSWER-9200.5-713A
  National Priorities List Sites: Idaho.
  PB92-963219/CDH                See 0182
OSWER-9200.5-713B
  National Priorities List Sites: Idaho, 1992.
  PB93-963212/CDH                See 0183
OSWER-9200.5-714A
  National Priorities List Sites: Illinois.
  PB92-963248/CDH                See 0185
OSWER-9200.5-714B
  National Priorities List Sites: Illinois, 1992.
  PB93-963213/CDH                See 0186
OSWER-9200.5-715A
  National Priorities List Sites: Indiana.
  PB92-963249/CDH                See 0188
                                                                                                                            NU-25

-------
                OSWER-9200.5-715B
                                                        NUMBER INDEX
Hf
!' I'!;
                OSWER-9200.5-715B
                  National Priorities Ust Sites: Indiana, 1992.
                  PB93-963214/CDH                See 0189
                OSWER-9200.5-716A
                  Nationai Priorities List Sites: Iowa.
                  p§82:963234/CDH	See 0191
                OSWER-9200.5-716B
                  liiatiftrjal Priorities Ust Sites: Iowa, 1992.
                  P893-963215/CDH                See 0192
                OSWER-9200.5-717A
                  National Priorities Ust Sites: Kansas.
                  PS92.963213/CDH                See 0194
                OS.WER-9200.5-717B
                  National Priorities Ust Sites: Kansas, 1992.
                  PB93.963216/CDH                See 0195
                OSWER-9200.5-718A
                  National Priorities Ust Sites: Kentucky!
                  PJ92-963227/CDH                See 0197
                OSWER-9200.5-718B
                  National Priorities Ust Sites: Kentucky, 19921
                  PB93-963217/CDH                See 0198
                OSWER.9200.5-719A
                  National Priorities Ust Sites: Louisiana.
                  Pja2-963222/OOH                See 0200
                                         .....
                  National Priorities List Sites: Louisiana, 1992.
                  P,B93-963218/Cp|j .................. n|       ,  366020,1
                                   ..........
 ' National Priorities Ust Sites: Maine.
  PB92-963204/CDH                See 0203
OSWER-9200.S-720B
  Nationai Priorities List Sites: Maine, 19921
  PB93-963219/CDH                See 0204
OSWER-9200.5-721A
  National Priorities Ust Sites: Maryland.
  PJ92-963218/CDIJ ........   i ......        See 0206
OSWER-9200.5-721B
  National Priorities List Sites: Maryland, 1992.
  P893-963220/CDH                See 0207
OSWER-9200.5-722A
  National Priorities Ust Sites; Massachusetts.
  PB92-963206/CDH                See 0209
OSWER-9200.5-722B
   I M,,      | LI    II I III II    II  I       ' i .......  . • ' ', i 'i
  Nat|ona( Priorities Ust Sites: Massachusetts,
  1992.
                                  .         ,
                OSWER-9200.5-723A
                  National Priorities Ust Sites: Michigan.
                  PB92-963247/CDH                See 0212
                OSWER-9200.5-723B
                  NatkmaJ Priorities Ust Sites: Michigan, 1992.
                  P893-963222/CDH                See 0213
                OSWER.9200.5-724A
                  Nationai Priorities Ust Sites: Minnesota.
                  PB92-96321 1 /COM                See 0215
                OSWER-9200.5-724B
                  National Priorities  Ust Sites: Minnesota, 1992.
                  PB03-963223/ODH                See 0216
                OSWER-9200.5-725A ..........................
                  National Priories" ..... Si Sites: Mississippi.
                  RB82-9e3224/COH                See 0218
                O8\fVER-9200,5-725B
                  National Priorilies  Ust Sites: Mississippi, 1992.
                  PB93-963224/CDH                See 02J9
                OSWfER-9200,5-726A
                  National Priorities List Sites: Missouri.
                  PB92-963214/CDH                See 0221
                OSWER-9200.5-726B
                  Nationai Prforitios Ust Sites: Missouri,  199a
                  P893-963225/CDH                See 0222

                NU-26
  OSWER-9200.5-727A
    National Priorities Ust Sites: Montana.
    PB92-963235/CDH                See 0224
  OSWER-9200.5-727B
    National Priorities List  Sites: Montana, 1992.
    PB93-963226/CDH                See 0225
  OSWER-9200.5-728A
    National Priorities List Sites: Nebraska.
    PB92-963233/CDH                See 0227
  OSWER-9200.5-728B
    National Priorities List Sites:  Nebraska, 1992.
    PB93-963227/CDH                See 0228
  OSWER-9200.5-729A
    National Priorities Ust Sites:  New Hampshire.
    PB92-963205/CDH                See 0230
  OSWER-9200.5-729B
    National Priorities List Sites:  New Hampshire,
  1111  1992.
    PB93-963228/CDH                See 0231
  OSWER-9200.5-730A
    National Priorities Ust Sites: New Jersey.
    PB92-963241/CDH                See 0233
  OSWER-9200.5-730B
    National Priorities List Sites: New Jersey, 1992.
	PB93-9632297cbH	See 0234
  OSVVER:92qp=?5-73s1A
    National Priorities List Sites: New Mexico.
    PB92-963232/CDH                See 0236
  OSWER-9200.5-731B
    National Priorities List  Sites:  New  Mexico,
    1992.
  	  PB93-96323Q/CPH                See 0237
  PSWER-92PQ.5-732A
    National Priorities List Sites: New York.
, 	  PB92-9632Q8/CDH                See 0239
  OSWER-9200.5-732B
    Nationai Priorities List Sites: New York, 1992.
    PB93-963231/CDH                See 0240
  OSWER-9200.5-733A
    National Priorities List  Sites: North Carolina.
    PB92-963209/CDH                See 0244
  OSWER-9200.5-733B
    National Priorities  List  Sites: North Carolina,
    1992.
    PB93-963232/CDH                See 0245
  OSWER-9200.5-734A
    National Priorities List Sites: North Dakota and
    South Dakota.
    PB92-963236/CDH                See 0246
  OSWER-9200.5-734B
    National Priorities List Sites: North and South
    Dakota, 1992.
    PB93-963233/CDH                See 0242
  OSWER-9200.5-735A
    National Priorities List Sites: Ohio.
    PB92-963246/CDH                See 0248
  OSWER-9200.5-735B
    National Priorities List Sites: Ohio, 1992.
    PB93-963234/CDH                See 0249
  OSWER-9200.5-736A
	  National Priorities List Sites: Oklahoma.
    PB92-963221/CDH                See 0251
  pSWER-92p0.5:736B
  'National Priorities List Sites: Oklahoma, 1992.
    PB93-963235/CbH                See 0252
  pSWER-920p.5-737A
    National Priorities List Sites: Oregon.
    PB92-963245/CDH                See 0254
  OSWER-9200.5-737B
    National Priorities List Sites: Oregon, 1992.
    PB93-963236/CDH                See 0255
  OSWER-9200.5-738A
    National Priorities Ust Sites: Pennsylvania.
    PB92-963240/CDH                See 0257
  OSWER-9200.5-738B
    National  Priorities  List  Sites:  Pennsylvania,
    1992.
    PB93-963237/CDH                See 0258
  OSWER-9200.5-739A
    National Priorities List Sites: Rhode Island.
    PB92-963230/CDH                See 0263
  OSWER-9200.5-739B
    National  Priorities List Sites:  Rhode  Island,
    1992.
    PB93-963239/CDH                See 0264
  OSWER-9200.5-740A
    National Priorities  List Sites:  South  Carolina.
    PB92-963210/CDH                See 0267
  OSWER-9200.5-740B
    National Priorities  Ust Sites:  South  Carolina,
    1992.
    PB93-963240/CDH                See 0268
  OSWER-9200.5-741A
    National Priorities List Sites: Tennessee.
    PB92-963225/CDH                See 0270
  OSWER-9200.5-741B
    National Priorities List Sites: Tennessee, 1992.
    PB93-963241/CDH                See 0271
  OSWER-9200.5-742A
    Natjonal Priorities Ust Sites: Texas.
	PB92-963212/CbH	S'ee"0273	
  OSWER-9200.5-742B
    National Priorities Ust Sites: Texas, 1992.
    PB93-963242/CDH                See 0274
  OSWER-9200.5-743A
    National Priorities List Sites: Utah.
    PB92-963215/CDH                See 0277
  OSWER-9200.5-743B
    National Priorities List Sites: Utah, 1992.
    PB93-963243/CDH                See 0278
  OSWER-9200.5-744A
    National Priorities List Sites: Vermont.
    PB92-963231/CDH                See 0280
  OSWER-9200.5-744B
    National Priorities  List Sites:  Vermont, 1992.
    PB93-963244/CDH                See 0281
  OSWER-9200.5-745A
    National Priorities List Sites: Virginia.
    PB92-963217/CDH                See 0283
  OSWER-9200.5-745B
    National Priorities List Sites: Virginia, 1992.
    PB93-963245/CDH                See 0284
  OSWER-9200.5-746A
    National Priorities List Sites: Washington.
    PB92-963244/CDH                See 0286
  OSWER-9200.5-746B
    National  Priorities  List   Sites:   Washington,
    1992.	           	
    PB93-963246/CDH                See 0287
  OSWER-9200.5-747A
    National Priorities List Sites: West Virginia.
    PB92-963229/CDH    ^           See 0289
  OSWER-9200.5-747B
 ,,  National Priorities  List Sites: West Virginia,
	1992.	
    PB93-963247/CDH                See 0290

-------
                                                       NUMBER INDEX
                                                                  OSWER-9230.0-03C
OSWER-9200.5-748A
  National Priorities List Sites: Wisconsin.
  PB92-963243/CDH               See 0292
OSWER-9200.5-748B
  National Priorities  List Sites: Wisconsin, 1992.
  PB93-963248/CDH               See 0293
OSWER-9200.5-749A
  National Priorities List Sites: Wyoming.
  PB92-963238/CDH               See 0295
OSWER-9200.5-749B
  National Priorities  List Sites: Wyoming, 1992.
  PB93-963249/CDH               See 0296
OSWER-9200.5-750A
  National Priorities List Sites: American Samoa,
  Guam, and the Trust Territories.
  PB92-963242/CDH               See 0154
OSWER-9200.5-750B
  National Priorities List Sites: The United States
  Territories, 1992.
  PB93-963203/CDH               See 0275
OSWER-9200.5-751A
  National Priorities List Sites: Puerto Rico.
  PB92-963207/CDH               See 0260
OSWER-9200.5-751B
  National Priorities  List Sites: Puerto Rico and
  Virgin Islands, 1992.
  PB93-963238/CDH               See 0261
OSWER-9200.8-05
  Audit Management Process. Reference Guide.
  PB94-963232/CDH               See 0085
OSWER-9200.8-05-1
  SRIS System Overview and User's Guide.
  PB94-963233/CDH               See 0112
OSWER-9200.9-02
  Procedures to Ensure that CLP Laboratories
  Are Not Paid for Non-Compliant or Unuseable
  Data.
  PB94-963214/CDH               See 0062
OSWER-9201.0-01
  Implementation of the Superfund  Alternative
  Remedial Contracting Strategy (ARCS): Report
  of the Administrator's Task Force. Implementa-
  tion Plan.
  PB92-963201/CDH               See 0032
OSWER-9201.0-02
  National Superfund Program Priorities, Fiscal
  Year 1994.
  PB94-963221/CDH               See 0298
OSWER-9202.1-01
  Regional Pilot Projects and Initiatives.
  PB92-963259/CDH               See 0064
OSWER-9202.1-02I-VOL-1-NO-1
  Smart  Moves  in Superfund - Regional Initia-
  tives. Volume 1,  Number 1, February 1992.
  PB92-963272/CDH               See 0305
OSWER-9202.1-02I-VOL-1-NO-2
  Smart  Moves  in Superfund - Regional Pilots
  and  Initiatives. Volume 1, Number 2, Septem-
  ber 1992.
  PB93-963283/CDH                See 0306
OSWER-9202.1-02I-VOL-1-NO-3
  Smart Moves in Superfund - Revitalization One
  Year Later. Volume  1,  Number 3, January
  1993.
  PB93-963284/CDH                See 0307
OSWER-9202.1-02I-VOL-2-NO-1
  Response Action Contractor Final Indemnifica-
  tion  Guidelines. Volume 2, Number 1, March
  1993.
  PB93-963290/CDH                See 0067
OSWER-9202.1-03FS
  Regional Pilots and Applications of Superfund
  Accelerated Cleanup Model (SACM).
  PB92-963273/CDH               See 0110
OSWER-9202.1-04
  Identification of a Senior Superfund Official for
  Addressing Special NPL Site-Related Issues.
  PB93-963279/CDH               See 0348
OSWER-9202.1-05
  Required Contracts Management Training for
  Regional Superfund Personnel.
  PB93-963258/CDH               See 0065
OSWER-9202.1-06
  Initiatives to Streamline the Alternative Reme-
  dial Contracting  Strategy (ARCS)  Contracts'
  Award Fee Process.
  PB93-963275/CDH               See 0033
OSWER-9202.1-07
  Superfund: Report of the EPA Superfund Revi-
  talization  Public  Meeting  Held on June  24,
  1992. Volumes 1 and 2.
  PB92-963288/CDH               See 0333
OSWER-9202.1-09
  Guidance on Program Management Activities
  under ARCS.
  PB93-963280/CDH               See 0026
OSWER-9202.1-10-1
  Compendium of Good Ideas: Models of Suc-
  cess and Lessons Learned. Volume  1. High-
  lights.
  PB93-963271/CDH               See 0133
OSWER-9202.1-10-2
  Compendium of Good Ideas: Models of Suc-
  cess and Lessons Learned. Volume 2. Source
  Book.
  PB93-963272/CDH               See 0134
OSWER-9202.1-11
  Superfund:  EPA/ICMA Superfund  Revitaliza-
  tion Conference. Held in  Chicago, Illinois on
  November 12-13, 1992.
  PB93-963274/CDH               See 0319
OSWER-9202.1-15A
  Status  of  Regional Superfund Pilots: End-of-
  Year Report.
  PB94-963216/CDH               See 0309
OSWER-9202.1-16
  Superfund:  EPA/ICMA Superfund  Revitaliza-
  tion Conference. Held in San Francisco,  Cali-
  fornia on February 1-2,1993.
  PB94-963202/CDH               See 0320
OSWER-9202.1-19
  Superfund Revitalization:  Measures  of  Suc-
  cess.
  PB94-963217/CDH               See 0334
OSWER-9203.1-01
  Superfund   Accelerated    Cleanup   Model
  (SACM).
  PB92-963263/CDH               See 0119
OSWER-9203.1-02I-VOL-1-NO-1
  Superfund  Accelerated   Cleanup  Bulletin.
  Volume 1, Number  1. Presumptive Remedies
  for Municipal Landfill Sites.
  PB92-963367/CDH               See 0117
OSWER-9203.1-02I-VOL-1-NO-2
  Superfund Accelerated Cleanup  Bulletin: Pre-
  sumptive Remedies for Wood Treatment Facili-
  ties. Volume 1, Number 2, May 1992.
  PB92-963361/CDH               See 0116
OSWER-9203.1-02I-VOL-1-NO-3
  Superfund  Accelerated   Cleanup  Bulletin.
  Volume 1, Number 3. Presumptive Remedies.
  PB92-963371 /CDH               See 0118
OSWER-9203.1-02I-VOL-1-NO-4
  Superfund   Accelerated   Cleanup   Model
  (SACM). Volume  1, Number 4,  November
  1992.
  PB92-963287/CDH               See 0122
OSWER-9203.1-02I-VOL-2-NO-1
  Superfund Accelerated Cleanup Bulletin:  Pre-
  sumptive Remedies for Municipal Landfill Sites.
  Volume 2, Number 1, February 1993.
  PB93-963269/CDH               See 0115
OSWER-9203.1-03
  Guidance on Implementation of the Superfund
  Accelerated Cleanup  Model (SACM) under
  CERCLA and the NCP.
  PB93-963252/CDH               See 0094
OSWER-9203.1-03A
  Exercising Flexibility through the Superfund Ac-
  celerated Cleanup Model (SACM).
  PB93-963253/CDH               See 0091
OSWER-9203.1-05I-VOL-1-NO-1
  Status  of Key  SACM Program Management
  Issues: Interim Guidance, Volume 1, Number 1,
  December 1992.
  PB93-963262/CDH               See 0113
OSWER-9203.1-05I-VOL-1-NO-2
  Early  Action and  Long-Term  Action under
  SACM: Interim Guidance, Volume 1, Number 2,
  December 1992.
  PB93-963263/CDH               See 0089
OSWER-9203.1-05I-VOL-1-NO-3
  Enforcement under  SACM: Interim Guidance.
  Volume 1, Number 3, December 1992.
  PB93-963264/CDH               See 0090
OSWER-9203.1-05I-VOL-1-NO-4
  Assessing  Sites under SACM:  Interim Guid-
  ance. Volume 1, Number 4, Deccember 1992.
  PB93-963265/CDH               See 0084
OSWER-9203.1-05I-VOL-1-NO-5
  SACM Regional Decision Teams: Interim Guid-
  ance.  Volume 1, Number  5, December 1992.
  PB93-963266/CDH               See 0111
OSWER-9203.1-06
  Guidance on Setting Priorities for NPL Candi-
  date Sites.
  PB93-963333/CDH               See 0344
OSWER-9203.1-07I-VOL-1-NO-1
  HSED  SACM  Report Volume  1,  Number 1,
  January 1993.
  PB93-963289/CDH               See 0096
OSWER-9203.1-08
  Further Direction on Implementing the Super-
  fund Accelerated Cleanup Model (SACM).
  PB93-963291/CDH               See 0093
OSWER-9203.1-10FS
  Superfund    Accelerated   Cleanup   Model
  (SACM): Questions and Answers.
  PB93-963286/CDH               See 0121
OSWER-9203.1-11
  Superfund Accelerated Cleanup Model (SACM)
  Coordination Strategy.
  PB94-963201/CDH               See 0120
OSWER-9203.1-13
  Expectations for Full Implementation of SACM.
  PB94:963219/CDH               See 0092
OSWER-9221.2-01FS
  CERCLIS - WasteLAN - CleanLAN.
  PB91-921316/CDH               See 0015
OSWER-9230.0-03C
  Community Relations  in Superfund: A Hand-
  book.
  PB92-963341/CDH               See 0467
                                                                                                                          NU-27

-------
 OSWER-9230.0-05FSA
                      NUMBER INDEX
 OSWER-9230.0-05FSA
   Suparfund Fact Sheet Arsenic.
   PS93-963305/CDH               See 0488
 OSWER-9230.0-05FSB
   Supwfund Fact Sheet; Exposure Pathways.
   PB93-963306/CDH               See 0393
 OSWER-9230.0-05FSC
   Superfund Fact Shoot: Trichloraethylene.
   FgB3-9633q7/pC>H ........................     See 0496
See 0489
   Superfond Fact Sheet Benzene.
   P893-963306/CDH
 OSWER-9230.0-05FSF
   Suporfund Fact Sheet: PCBs.
   PB93-963309/CDH               See 0492
 OSWER-9230.0.05FSG
   Suportund Fact Sheet The Removal Program.
   PB93-963310/CDH               See 0495
 OSWER:9230.(W35FSH
   Suporfund Fact Sheet An Overview.
   PB93-96331 1 /CDH               See 0487
 OSWER-9230.0-05FSI
   Suporfund Fact Sheet: Community Interviews.
   P883-963312/CDH               See 0490
 OSWER-9230.0-05FSJ
   Superfund Fact Sheet Public Involvement.
   PBS3-963313/CDH               See 0493
 OSWER-9230.0-05FSK
   Superfund Fact Sheet Identifying Sites.
   PB93-963314/CDH               See 0491
 OSWER-9230.0-05FSM
   Supetfund Fact Sheet The Remedial Program.
   P893-963315/CDH               See 0494
 OSWER-9230.0-13
   Minimizing Problems Caused by Staff Turnover
   (Suporfund Management Review: Recommen-
   dalfcm No. 43, M, N. O).
   P19J.8g134,5/CpH ....................................  See 0105
 OSWER-9230,0-16
   MSffifl Suporfund  Documents Available to the
   Public throughout  the Cleanup Process, and
   Discussing  Site Findings  and  Decisions  as
   They aro Devefoped (Superfund Management
   Review No. 43 G, H, Q, R. T).
   PS91-921322/CDH               See 0100
 O8WER-9230.0-17
   Using State and  Local Officials to Assist in
   Community Relations (Superfund Management
   Rgvtew: Recommendation, fijp. 43.K.L).
   r^j-iaisao/ppp;;;;,;  ;,;;,,;;; : ' ; ...... see 0121
 OSWpR-9230.0-20 .........................................
  InnoyaKva Mothods to Increase Public Involve-
  nip ,,]0 Superfund Community Relations (Su-
  pgund Management  Review Recommenda-
  tfcm No. 43.A).
  PB81-921344/CDH                See 0097
 OSWER.9230.0-23FS
  Homeowners Exempted from Superfund Clean-
  up Costs: National Pojtcy Overview.
  PB92.963336/CQH                See 0426
 OSWER-9230.1-OS/FSA
  Superfund Technical Assistance  Grants (Fact
  Shcal)
  PB93-963301                     See 0503
 OSlrfSR-9230.1-08
  SujjMmd  technical   Assistance   Grants
  (TAGs) (Pamphlet).
  PB93-963302                    See 0505
                 ,
  Suporfund Technical Assistance Grant (TAG)
  Handbook Applying for Your Grant.
  P8S3-963352                    See 0500
 OSWER-9230.1-09B
   Superfund Technical Assistance Grant (TAG)
   Handbook: The Application Forms with Instruc-
   tions.
   PB93-963353                    See 0501
 OSWER-9234.1-06
   Applicability  of Land Disposal  Restrictions to
   RCRA and CERCLA Ground Water Treatment
   Reinjection  Superfund  Management Review:
   Recommendation No. 26.
   PB91-921332/CDH               See 1430
 OSWER-9234.2-01 FS-A
   ARARs Q's  and A's: General  Policy, RCRA,
   CWA, SDWA, Post-ROD Information, and Con-
   tingent Waivers.
   PB91-921341/CDH               See 0401
 OSWER-9234.2-13FS
   ARARs Q's  and A's:  The  Fund-Balancing
   Waiver.
   PB91-921321/CDH               See 0403
 OSWER-9234.2-15FS
   ARARs Q's  and  A's Compliance with New
   SDWA National Primary Drinking Water Regu-
   lations for Organic and Inorganic  Chemicals.
   PB91-921363/CDH               See 0400
 OSWER-9234.2-22FS
   ARARs Fact  Sheet: Compliance with the Clean
   Air Act and  Associated Air Quality  Require-
   ments.
   PB92-963282/CDH               See 0397
 OSWER-9234.2-25
   Guidance for Evaluating the Technical Imprac-
   ticability of Ground-Water Restoration.
   PB93-963507/CDH              See 1460
 OSWER-9240.0-01A
   User's  Guide to the Contract Laboratory Pro-
   gram.
   PB91-214296/CDH              See 0079
 OSWER-9240.0-01D
   User's  Guide to the Contract Laboratory Pro-
   gram.
   PB91-921278/CDH               See 0080
 OSWER-9240.0-02B
   Extending the Tracking of Analytical  Services
  to Potentially Responsible  Party-Lead Super-
  fund  Sites   (Supplemental  Guidance  on
  OSWER Directive 9240.0-2A).
  PB93-963502/CDH               See 0986
 OSWER-9240.0-05A
  Specifications and Guidance for Contaminant-
  Free Sample  Containers.
  PB93-963316/CDH               See 0994
 OSWER-9240.0-06
  Sampler's  Guide  to the Contract  Laboratory
  Program.
  PB91-921330/CDH               See 0071
 OSWER-9240.0-25
  Reassignment of  CLP  Transportation  Func-
  tions.
  PB93-963501/CDH               See 0063
OSWER-9240.1-05
  USEPA Contract Laboratory  Program  National
  Functional  Guidelines   for  Organic   Data
  Review.
  PB94-963501/CDH               See 0077
OSWER-9240.1-05-01
  USEPA Contract Laboratory  Program  National
  Functional  Guidelines  for   Inorganic  Data
  Review.
  PB94-963502/CDH               See 0997
 OSWER-9242.2-03
   Administrative Guidance for the FIT to ARCS
   (FIT/ARCS) Transition.
   PB92-963332/CDH               See 0017
 OSWER-9242.2-05
   Implementation  of the  Alternative  Remedial
   Contracting Strategy (ARCS) Task Force Rec-
   ommendations: Transmittal of the Implementa-
   tion Plan.
   PB92-963258/CDH               See 0030
 OSWER-9242.2-06
   Superfund Contracts Management Issues.
   PB92-963257/CDH               See 0072
 OSWER-9242.2-06A
   Resources for Preparing Independent Govern-
   ment Estimates for Remedial Contracting Work
   Assignments.
   PB93-963267/CDH               See 0066
 OSWER-9242.2-08FS
   Superfund Response Action Contracts.
   PB93-963292/CDH               See 0074
 OSWER-9242.3-08
   Revision   of  Policy  Regarding  Superfund
   Project Assignment between Alternative Reme-
   dial Contracting  Strategy Contractors and the
   U.S. Army Corps of Engineers.
   PB92-963327/CDH               See 0068
 OSWER-9242.3-09
   Use of Time and Materials and Cost  Reim-
   bursement Subcontracts for Remedial Actions
   under the Alternative Remedial Contracting
   Strategy Contracts.
   PB93-963282/CDH               See 1141
 OSWER-9242.3-10
   Congressional Limits for FY 92 Alternative Re-
   medial  Contracting  Strategy (ARCS) Program
   Management Costs.
   PB92-963260/CDH                See 0022
 OSWER-9242.6-05
   Headquarters Support Contract  Management
   Procedures.
   PB91-921335/CDH               See 0029
 OSWER-9242.6-08
  Total Quality Management  (TQM) and Quality
  Assurance (QA) In Superfund.
   PB91-921333/CDH               See 0996
 OSWER-9242.6-10
  Long-Term Contracting Strategy for Superfund
  - Implementation.
  PB91-921358/CDH               See 0043
 OSWER-9242.6-12
  Mentor-Protege Program.
  PB93-963251/CDH               See 0044
 OSWER-9242.6-13
  Performance Tracking under ARCS Contracts.
  PB93-963276/CDH               See 0061
 OSWER-9272.0-06
  Compendium of  Federal  Facilities Directives,
  1984 and 1985.
  PB91-921280/CDH               See 0896
OSWER-9280.0-02
  Policy on Floodplains and Wetland Assess-
  ments for CERCLA Actions.
  PB91-921329/CDH               See 0437
OSWER-9283.1-03
  Suggested ROD Language for Various Ground
  Water Remediation Options.
  PB91-921325/CDH               See 1475
NU-28

-------
                                                       NUMBER INDEX
                                                                   OSWER-9345.1-08
OSWER-9283.1-06
  Considerations in Ground-Water Remediation
  at  Superfund  Sites  and  RCRA Facilities:
  Update.
  PB92-963358/CDH               See 1437
OSWER-9285.0-01A
  OSWER  Integrated Health and  Safety Stand-
  ard Operating Practices.
  PB93-963401/CDH               See 0921
OSWER-9285.1-02
  Health and Safety Roles and Responsibilities
  at Remedial Sites.
  PB91-921362/CDH               See 0918
OSWER-9285.1-03
  Standard Operating Safety Guides.
  PB92-963414/CDH               See 0925
OSWER-9285.2-06FS
  Establishing Work Zones at Uncontrolled Haz-
  ardous Waste Sites.
  PB91-921342/CDH               See 0908
OSWER-9285.2-07FS
  Hazardous Waste Operations and Emergency
  Response: RCRA TSD and  Emergency Re-
  sponse Without Regard to Location.
  PB91-921340/CDH               See 0914
OSWER-9285.2-08FS
  Hazardous Waste Operations and Emergency
  Response: Uncontrolled  Hazardous  Waste
  Sites and RCRA Corrective Actions.
  PB91-921339/CDH    '           See 0425
OSWER-9285.3-03
  Field Certification Tracking  System  (FCTS).
  User's Guide. Version 2.1.
  PB93-963415/CDH               See 0909
OSWER-9285.3-06
  Priority for Health and Safety Requirements,
  Especially Medical Surveillance Requirements,
  for EPA Employees Who Support OSWER Pro-
  grams.
  PB91-921346/CDH               See 0923
OSWER-9285.4-06
  ATSDR Health Consultations  under CERCLA.
  PB93-963334/CDH               See 1018
OSWER-9285.6-03
  Risk  Assessment Guidance  for Superfund.
  Volume 1. Human Health Evaluation  Manual.
  Supplemental Guidance: 'Standard Default Ex-
  posure Factors'.
  PB91-921314/CDH               See 1071
OSWER-9285.6-04FS
  Emergency Responders Agreements for Fund-
  Lead Remedial Actions.
  PB93-963418/CDH               See 1001
OSWER-9285.7-01B
  Risk  Assessment Guidance  for Superfund.
  Volume 1. Human Health Evaluation Manual
  (Part B,  Development of Risk-Based Prelimi-
  nary Remediation Goals).
  PB92-963333/CDH               See 1068
OSWER-9285.7-01BFS
  Risk  Assessment Guidance  for Superfund.
  Volume 1. Human Health Evaluation Manual
  (Part B).
  PB92-963339/CDH               See 1067
OSWER-9285.7-01C
  Risk  Assessment Guidance  for Superfund.
  Volume 1. Human Health Evaluation Manual
  (Part C, Risk Evaluation of Remedial  Alterna-
  tives).
  PB92-963334/CDH               See 1070
OSWER-9285.7-01CFS
  Risk  Assessment  Guidance for Superfund.
  Volume 1. Human Health Evaluation Manual
  (Part C).
  PB92-963340/CDH               See 1069
OSWER-9285.7-05
  Risk Assessment in Superfund: A Primer.  First
  Edition, September 1990.
  PB91-214197/CDH               See 1073
OSWER-9285.7-08FS
  Understanding Superfund Risk Assessment.
  PB92-963372/CDH               See 0508
OSWER-9285.7-08I-VOL-1-NO-1
  Supplemental Guidance to RAGS: Calculating
  the Concentration Term. Volume 1, Number 1,
  May 1992.
  PB92-963373/CDH               See 1079
OSWER-9285.7-09A
  Guidance for Data Useability in Risk Assess-
  ment (Part A).
  PB92-963356/CDH               See 1033
OSWER-9285.7-09B
  Guidance for Data Useability in Risk Assess-
  ment (Part B).
  PB92-963362/CDH               See 1034
OSWER-9285.7-09FS
  Guidance for Data Useability in Risk Assess-
  ment
  PB92-963363/CDH               See 1031
OSWER-9285.7-13
  Implementing the Deputy Administrator's  Risk
  Characterization Memorandum.
  PB93-963317/CDH               See 1056
OSWER-9285.7-16
  Use of IRIS Values in Superfund Risk Assess-
  ment.
  PB93-963360/CDH               See 1081
OSWER-9285.8-01
  Health and Safety Plan (HASP) User's Guide
  (Version 3.0/4.0).
  PB93-963414/CDH               See 0917
OSWER-9320.1-10
  Compendium of NPL Listing  Policies and  Pro-
  cedures, 1982 to 1985.
  PB91 -921281 /CDH               See 0338
OSWER-9320.1-11
  Discussions with the  Public Concerning  NPL
  PB93-963338/CDH               See 0339
OSWER-9320.2-3C
  Update No. 2 to  'Procedures for Completion
  and Deletion of NPL Sites'.
  PB92-963344/CDH               See 0395
OSWER-9320.2-05
  Amendment to Historical  Definitions  of  NPL
  Deletion Start and Completion Dates.
  PB93-963278/CDH               See 0335
OSWER-9320.2-06
  NPL Construction Completion  Definition  at
  Bioremediation and Soil Vapor Extraction Sites.
  PB93-963327/CDH               See 0365
OSWER-9320.2-07
  Additional Guidance on 'Worst Sites' and 'NPL
  Caliber Sites' to Assist in  SACM Implementa-
  tion.
  PB94-963206/CDH               See 0083
OSWER-9320.3-08
  CERCLIS Listing.
  PB91-921348/CDH               See 0014
OSWER-9320.7-08
  FACT BOOK: National Priorities List under the
  Original Hazard Ranking System, 1981-1991.
  PB93-963350/CDH               See 0340
OSWER-9330.2-13FS
  Guide  to   Discharging  CERCLA  Aqueous
  Wastes to Publicly Owned Treatment Works
  (POTWs).
  PB91-921364/CDH               See 0423
OSWER-9345.0-01A
  Guidance for Performing Preliminary  Assess-
  ments under CERCLA.
  PB92-963303/CDH               See 0342
OSWER-9345.0-05I-VOL-1-NO-1
  ECO Update: The Role of BTAGs in Ecological
  Assessment. Volume  1, Number 1, September
  1991.
  PB92-963337/CDH               See 1020
OSWER-9345.0-05I-VOL-1-NO-2
  ECO Update: Ecological Assessment of Super-
  fund Sites. An Overview. Volume 1, Number 2,
  December 1991.
  PB92-963335/CDH               See 1019
OSWER-9345.0-05I-VOL-1-NO-3
  ECO Update. Volume 1, Number 3. The Role
  ,of Natural Resource Trustees in the Superfund
  Process.
  PB92-963369/CDH               See 1021
  ECO Update. Volume  1, Number 4. Developing
  a Work Scope for Ecological Assessments.
  PB92-963370/CDH               See 1022
OSWER-9345.0-05I-VOL-1-NO-5
  ECO Update. Volume 1,  Number 5, August
  1992. Briefing the BTAG: Initial Description  of
  Setting, History,  and Ecology of a Site.
  PB92-963374/CDH               See 1023
OSWER-9345.0-07
  Standard Document for Remedial Site Assess-
  ment Decisions.
  PB93-963268/CDH               See 0392
OSWER-9345.0-08
  PA Review Checklist.
  PB93-963342/CDH               See 0366
OSWER-9345.0-09
  Military Base Closures: Guidance on EPA Con-
  currence in the  Identification of Uncontaminat-
  ed Parcels under CERCLA Section 120(h)(4).
  PB94-963249/CDH               See 0899
OSWER-9345.1-03FS
  Revised  Hazard Ranking  System:  Evaluating
  Sites After Waste Removals.
  PB92-963326/CDH               See 0379
OSWER-9345.1-04
  PREscore Software. Users Manual and Tutori-
  al. Version 1.0.
  PB92-963349/CDH               See 0374
OSWER-9345.1-05
  Guidance for  Performing Site  Inspections
  under CERCLA.
  PB92-963375/CDH               See 0343
OSWER-9345.1-07
  Hazard Ranking System Guidance Manual.
  PB92-963377/CDH               See 0346
OSWER-9345.1-07FS
  Hazard Ranking System Guidance Manual.
  PB93-963356/CDH               See 0347
OSWER-9345.1-08
  Regional Quality Control  Guidance for  NPL
  Candidate Sites.
  PB92-963352/CDH               See 0376
                                                                                                                         NU-29

-------
 OSWER-9345.1-09-0
                                                       NUMBER INDEX
 OSWER-9346.1-09-0
   NPL Characterization Project National Results.
   PB82-963304/CDH                Sea 0355
 OSWER-9345.1-09-1
   NPt Characterization Project Region  1  Re-
   suds.
   RB92-963305/CDH                See 0356
 OSWER-9345.1-09-3
   NPL Characterization Project Region  3 Re-
   SUjta,
   PB92-963307/CDH                See 0357
                 , ................ , ......... , ......... .,.. ,  , .. ..... ,, .........
  NPL Characterization  Project: Region 4  Re-
  sutts.
  PB92.963308/COH                See 0358
OSWER-9345.1-09-5
  NPL Characterization  Project Region 5  Re-
  suits,
  PB92-963309/CDH                See 0359
OSWER-9345.1-09-6
  NPL Characterization  Project Region 6  Re-
  sWts,
  PB92-963310/CDH                See 0360
OSWER.9345.1-09-7
  NPL Characterization  Project Region 7  Re-
  suits.
  PB82-96331 1 /CDH                Sea 0361
OSWER-9345.1-03-8
  NPL Characterization  Project Region 8  Re-

, ' PB92-963312/CDH ...........................
O8WER-9345.1-09-9
  NPL Characterization  Project Region 9  Re-
  SUHS,   .........................
  PB92-963313/CDH                See 0363
                                   See 0362
                    i .........
   NfL' Characterization'1 Project  Region  10 Re-
   sjljjs. "
   P|8?.$63314/COH"""""  ...... !' ......   See 0364
 OS|(|R-9345,1^p-0 "~ ;  '„'''"        ,"'    I,
   CpRCLtS Characterization  Project:  National
   Ffe*s.,;   ' " ...... '::;  ,;;; ........
   PB92.963315/CDH               See 0001
 OSWER-934S.1.10-1
   CERCLIS Characterization Project: Region 1
   Results,
   P892.963316/CDH               Sea 0002
 OSWER-9345.1-10-2
   CfeRCLIS Characterization Project Region 2
   Results.
   PB92-963317/COH               See 0003
 OSWER-9345.1-10-3
   CERCLIS Characterization Project Region 3
   Results.
   PB92.963318/CDH               See 0004
 O8l|R-9345lt-lb4l I"  "„,""  .' ', ............. ." . ,' .....
   ciRCLIS Characjerizatton Project Region 4
   Results.
   P892-963319/CDH „ ..... ............ r   ,    See 0005
" <5SWER-9345.1-10-5 ...................
   CiRCLtS Characterization Project: Region 5
   Results. ........................................
   P|82-963320/CbH               See 0006
 OSWER-9345.1-10-6
   CERCLIS Characterization Project Region 6
   Results.
   P892-963321/CDH               See 0007
 OSWER-9345.1-10-7
   CERCLIS Characterization Project Region 7
   Results.
   P|92-963322/CDH               See OOQ8
OSWER-9345.1-10-8
  CERCLIS Characterization Project  Region  8
  Results.
  PB92-963323/CDH                See 0009
OSWER-9345.1-10-9
  CERCLIS Characterization Project  Region  9
  Results.
  PB92-963324/CDH                See 0010
OSWER-9345.1-10-10
  CERCLIS Characterization Project: Region 10
  Results.
  PB92-963325/CDH                SeeP°11
OSWER-9345.1-11 ..............................................
  PA-Score Software, Version 1.0. Users Manual
  and Tutorial.
  PB92-963302/CDH                See 0371
OSWER-9345.1-14
  Supplemental  Guide  to  Video  on Superfund
  Site Assessment Screening: A National Priori-
  ty.
  PB93-963323/CDH                See 0394
OSWER-9345.1-16FS
  Integrating Removal  and Remedial Site As-
  sessment Investigations.
  PB93-963341/CDH                See 0939
OSWER-9345.3-02
  Management of Investigation-Derived Wastes
  during Site Inspections.
  PB91-921331/CDH                See 0349
OSWER-9345.3-03FS
  Guide to Management of Investigation-Derived
  Wastes.
  PB92-963353/CDH                See 0345
OSWER-9345.4-02FS
  Guide to Community  Involvement for Site As-
  sessment Managers.
.  PB93-963348/CDH        '        See 0476
OSWER-9345i!4-03FS
  Site Assessment Evaluating  Risks  at Super-
  fund Sites.
'                      '         ""          "
                                             OSWER-9347.3-06FS                 '
                                              Superfund LDR Guide No. 6A (2nd  Edition)
                                              Obtaining a Soil  and Debris Treatability Vari-
                                              ance for Remedial Actions.
                                              PB91-921327/CDH                Sea 0445
                                             OSWER-9347.3-08FS
                                              Superfund LDR  Guide No.  7.  Determining
                                              When Land Disposal Restrictions (LDRs) Are
                                              Relevant and  Appropriate  to CERCLA  Re-
                                              sponse Actions.
                                              PB91-214122/CDH                See 0446
                                             OSWER-9347.3-10FS
                                              Guide to Obtaining No Migration Variances for
                                              CERCLA Remedial Actions.
                                              PB91-921367/CDH                See 0424
                                             OSWER-9347.3-12FS
                                              Superfund Guide to  RCRA Management Re-
                                              quirements for Mineral Processing Wastes.
                                              PB91 -921 31 8/CDH                See 0439
                                             OSWER-9355.0-30
                                              Role of the Baseline Risk Assessment in Su-
                                              perfund Remedy Selection Decisions.
                                              PB91-921359/CDH                See 1075
                                             OSWER-9355.0-36
                                              FY 1992 Themes for Regional Coordination to
                                              Support Continuous  Improvements  of Super-
                                              fund's Remedial Program.
                                              PB92-963368/CDH                See 1091
                                             OSWER-9355.0-39FS
                                              Remedial Action Report: Documentation  for
                                              Operable Unit Completion.
                                              PB92-963364/CDH                See 1134
OSWER-9355.0-47FS
  Presumptive Remedies: Policy and Procedures.
  PB93-963345/CDH                See 1103
OSWER-9355.0-48FS
  Presumptive  Remedies: Site Characterization
  and Technology Selection for CERCLA Sites
  with Volatile Organic Compounds in Soils.
  PB93-963346/CDH                See 1104
OSWER-9355.0-49FS
  Presumptive  Remedy for CERCLA Municipal
  Landfill Sites.
  PB93-963339/CDH                See 1105
OSWER-9355.3-02FS-3
  Guide to Developing  Superfund No Action, In-
  terim Action, and Contingency  Remedy RODs.
  PB91-921350/CDH                See 1098
OSWER-9355.3-02FS-4
  Guide to Addressing  Pre-ROD and Post-ROD
  Changes.
  PB91-921351/CDH                See 1096
OSWER-9355.3-17
  Compendium of ROD Language for FY  1993
  Focus Areas.
  PB93-963328/CDH                See 1083
OSWER-9355.3-20
  Revisions to OMB Circular A-94 on Guidelines
  and Discount Rates for Benefit-Cost Analysis.
  PB93-963297/CDH                See 1107
OSWER-9355.4-02
  Interim Guidance on  Establishing Soil  Lead
  Cleanup Levels at Superfund Sites. Supple-
  ment to Interim Guidance on Establishing Soil
  Lead Cleanup Levels at Superfund Sites.
  PB91-921352/CDH                See 1516
OSWER-9355.4-02A
  interim Guidance on  Establishing Soil  Lead
  Cleanup Levels at Superfund Sites. Supple-
  ment to Interim Guidance on Establishing Soil
  Lead Cleanup Levels at Superfund Sites.
  PB91-921352/CDH                See 1516
OSWER-9355.4-04FS
  Guide:  Methods for Evaluating the Attainment
  of Cleanup  Standards  for Soils  and  Solid
  Media.
  PB91-921365/CDH                See 1508
OSWER-9355.4-05
  Evaluation  of Ground-Water Extraction Reme-
  dies: Phase  2. Volume 1. Summary Report.
  PB92-963346/CDH                See 1444
OSWER-9355.4-05A
  Evaluation  of Ground-Water Extraction Reme-
  dies: Phase 2.  Volume 2. Case Studies  and
  Updates.
  PB92-963347/CDH                See 1445
OSWER-9355.4-06
  Summary of Treatment Technology Effective-
  ness for Contaminated Soil.
  PB92-963351/CDH               See 1533
OSWER-9355.4-07FS
  Estimating  Potential for Occurrence of DNAPL
  at Superfund Sites.
  PB92-963338/CDH               See 1442
OSWER-9355.4-13
  Evaluation  of the Likelihood of DNAPL Pres-
  ence at NPL Sites: National Results.
  PB93-963343/CDH               See 1448
OSWER-9355.4-14-1
  Technical Background Document for Draft Soil
  Screening Level Guidance.
  PB94-963503/CDH               See 1537
                  lii/xllilllli „  lliilHIU
                                  '• '"fli,,,:1 :
-------
                                                      NUMBER INDEX
                                                                OSWER-9360.7-13FS
OSWER-9355.4-14FS
  Distribution of DRAFT Soil  Screening Level
  Guidance.
  PB93-963508/CDH               See 1500
OSWER-9355.5-05FSA
  Procedure for Use of USAGE Prepiaced Con-
  tracts to Expedite Superfund Cleanup Tasks.
  PB94-963243/CDH               See 1131
OSWER-9355.5-07FS
  Real Estate Acquisition Procedures for USAGE
  Projects.
  PB91-921355/CDH               See 1133
OSWER-9355.5-16FS
  EPA Oversight of Remedial  Designs and Re-
  medial Actions Performed by  PRPs.
  PB91-921357/CDH               See 1124
OSWER-9355.6-04
  ROD Annual Report, FY 1990.
  PB91-921277/CDH               See 1112
OSWER-9355.6-05-1
  ROD Annual Report, FY1991. Volume 1.
  PB92-963359/CDH               See 1113
OSWER-9355.6-05-2
  ROD Annual Report, FY1991. Volume 2.
  PB92-963360/CDH               See 1114
OSWER-9355.6-06
  ROD Annual Report, FY 1992.
  PB93-963349/CDH               See 1115
OSWER-9355.7-02
  Structure  and  Components  of Five-Year Re-
  views.
  PB91-921369/CDH               See 1121
OSWER-9355.7-02FS1
  Structure  and  Components  of Five-Year Re-
  views.
  PB91-921368/CDH               See 1120
OSWER-9355.7-03
  Permits and Permit 'Equivalency' Processes for
  CERCLA On-Site Response Actions.
  PB93-963325/CDH               See 0435
OSWER-9355.9-01
  Data Quality Objectives Process for Superfund:
  Interim Final Guidance.
  PB94-963203/CDH               See 0983
OSWER-9355.9-01A
  Data Quality Objectives Process for Superfund:
  Workbook.
  PB94-963204/CDH               See 0984
OSWER-9355.9-01FS
  Data Quality Objectives Process for Superfund.
  PB94-963205/CDH               See 0981
OSWER-9355.9-03
  Data Quality Objectives Process for Superfund.
  PB94-963207/CDH               See 0982
OSWER-9355.9-04A
  Data Quality Objectives Decision Error Feasi-
  bility Trials (DEFT) Beta Version 1.01. User's
  Guide.
  PB94-963222/CDH               See 0979
OSWER-9355.15FS
  U.S. Bureau of Reclamation  Assistance to the
  Superfund Program.
  PB91-921319/CDH               See 1138
OSWER-9360.0-10
  Expedited Response Actions.
  PB93-963410/CDH               See 1003
OSWER-9360.0.13
  Guidance on Implementation of the 'Contribute
  to Remedial Performance' Provision.
  PB93-963413/CDH               See 1093
OSWER-9360.0-22FS
  Oil Notifications: Emergency Response Notifi-
  cation System (ERNS) Fact Sheet.
  PB92-963413/CDH               See 0930
OSWER-9360.0-23FS
  CERCLA Notifications: Emergency  Response
  Notification System (ERNS) Fact Sheet.
  PB92-963411/CDH               See 0926
OSWER-9360.0-29FS
  Overview of ERNS: Emergency Response No-
  tification System (ERNS) Fact Sheet.
  PB92-963412/CDH               See 0935
OSWER-9360.0-31FS
  Effect  of  OSHA's  Bloodborne  Pathogens
  Standard on Hazardous Waste Cleanup Activi-
  ties.
  PB93-963419/CDH               See 1026
OSWER-9360.0-32
  Guidance on Conducting Non-Time-Critical Re-
  moval Actions under CERCLA.
  PB93-963402/CDH               See 1005
OSWER-9360.0-32FS
  Conducting Non-Time-Critical Removal Actions
  under CERCLA.
  PB93-963422/CDH               See 0999
OSWER-9360.0-34
  Determination of Imminent and Substantial En-
  dangerment for Removal Actions.
  PB93-963416/CDH               See 1000
OSWER-9360.0-46FS
  Technology Selection Guide for Wood Treater
  Sites.
  PB93-963329/CDH               See 1122
OSWER-9360.2-02
  Policy on Management of Post-Removal Site
  Control.
  PB91-921326/CDH               See 1008
OSWER-9360.2-04
  Authorization for Regional  Administrators  to
  Approve  Consistency  Exemptions  at NPL
  Sites.
  PB92-963343/CDH               See 0998
OSWER-9360.2-04A
  Clarification of Delegation to Approve Consist-
  ency Exemptions at NPL Sites.
  PB93-963281/CDH               See 0336
OSWER-9360.3-01FS
  Guide to Developing Action Memorandums.
  PB91-921317/CDH ,              See 1097
OSWER-9360.3-02
  Superfund  Removal Procedures: Guidance on
  the Consideration of  ARARS during Removal
  Actions.
  PB92-963401/CDH               See 1013
OSWER-9360.3-02FS
  Consideration  of ARARs during Removal Ac-
  tions.
  PB92-963410/CDH    '           See 0419
OSWER-9360.3-Q5
  Superfund  Removal Procedures: Public Partici-
  pation  Guidance  for  On-Scene Coordinators:
  Community Relations  and the Administrative
  Record.
  PB92-963416/CDH               See 1014
OSWER-9360.3-06
  Superfund  Removal Procedures: Removal En-
  forcement  Guidance  for On-Scene Coordina-
  tors.
  PB92-963409/CDH               See 1015
OSWER-9360.3-06FS
  Guide to Removal Enforcement.
  PB92-963419/CDH               See 1006
OSWER-9360.4-02
  Compendium of ERT Soil Sampling and Sur-
  face Geophysics Procedures.
  PB91-921273/CDH               See 0904
OSWER-9360.4-03
  Compendium of ERT Surface Water and Sedi-
  ment Sampling Procedures.
  PB91 -921274/CDH               See 0905
OSWER-9360.4-04
  Compendium of ERT Field Analytical  Proce-
  dures.
  PB92-963405/CDH               See 0902
OSWER-9360.4-05
  Compendium of ERT Air Sampling Procedures.
  PB92-963406/CDH               See 0901
OSWER-9360.4-06
  Compendium of ERT Groundwater Sampling
  Procedures.
  PB91-921275/CDH               See 0903
OSWER-9360.4-07
  Compendium of ERT Waste Sampling  Proce-
  dures.
  PB91-921276/CDH               See 0907
OSWER-9360.4-08
  Compendium of ERT Toxicity Testing  Proce-
  dures.
  PB91-921271/CDH               See 0906
OSWER-9360.4-10
  Removal  Program Representative Sampling
  Guidance. Volume 1. Soil.
  PB92-963408/CDH               See 1010
OSWER-9360.6-06
  Superfund  Emergency Response  Actions:  A
  Summary of Federally-Funded Removals. Fifth
  Annual Report - Fiscal Year 1990.
  PB92-963403/CDH               See 0313
OSWER-9360.6-08
  Technical Assistance Team (TAT) Contracts
  Users' Manual.
  PB92-963407/CDH               See 0075
OSWER-9360.6-09
  Superfund  Emergency Response  Actions:  A
  Summary of Federally-Funded Removals. Sixth
  Annual Report, Fiscal Year 1991.
  PB92-963421/CDH               See 0315
OSWER-9360.7-02
  Continuous  Release - Emergency Response
  Notification  System. User's Manual for Indus-
  try.
  PB91-921287/CDH               See 1145
OSWER-9360.7-08FS
  Notification  Requirements for Continuous Re-
  leases of Hazardous Substances.
  PB92-963422/CDH               See 1148
OSWER-9360.7-11
  Questions  and Answers  on Release Notifica-
  tion  Requirements and  Reportable Quantity
  Adjustments.
  PB93-963411/CDH               See 1149
OSWER-9360.7-12FS
  Superfund  Guide: Clean Air Act Hazardous Air
  Pollutants Added to the List of CERCLA Haz-
  ardous Substances.
  PB93-963425/CDH               See 1151
OSWER-9360.7-13FS
  Superfund  Guide: Reportable Quantity  Adjust-
  ment for Methyl Isocyanate (MIC).
  PB93-963424/CDH               See 1152
                                                                                                                         NU-31

-------
 OSWER-9360.8-01FS
            NUMBER INDEX
OSWER.9366.8-01FS	
  OPA Q's and A's: Overview of tha Oil Pollution
  Act of 1990.
  PB92-963348/CPH                See 0933
OsiiR-9360.8-05
  09 Spf Contingency Planning: National Status.
  Aj.B'eport to the President,
  P|9J-f 21282/COHl'.	I'I,        See 0931
08WER.9360.84)6FS
  Faciity Response Plans.
  PB93-963406/CDH                See 0929
OSWER-9360.8-17FS	
  Personal Air Sampling and Air Monitoring Re-
  qutramonta under 29 CFR 1910.120.
  PS93-963420/CDH                See 0922
OSWER-9375.5-03FS-A
  Potitfcal Subdivision involvement in Superfund.
  P892-963330/CDH                See 0480
OSWER.9375.5-P4FS-A
  Audits and tha Superfund  Program  Manager.
  PI92-963328/CDH	      See 0087
OSWER-9375.5-06A/FS  '^_  '	     ',,
  dS ol Reinetiial'Aclon Model.
  PB93-963304/CDH                See 1085
  Supodund: Qualified '" Disadvantaged ' Business
  Ujjfzatiqn, in State Response.
  PB92-963283/CDH                See 0498
OSiSER-9375.S-i9
  Cost  of  Remedial  Actions (CORA)  Model:
  Ovwvtow and Applications.
  PB93-963318/CDH                See 1086
OSWER-9375.6-08B
  Analysis of  Stats Superfund Programs: 50-
  Stata Study. 1991 Update.
  PB92-963418/CDH                See 0449
OSWER-9375.7-01
  Ensuring tha Adequacy of Cost Share Provi-
  sions In Suporfund Stats Contracts.
  PS93-963336/CDH                Sea 0472
OSWER-9375.7-02
  Obfigation  of Funds under Superfund  State
  Contracts.
  PS03-963326/COH                See 0478
OSVVER-9380.0-17,, ,1 ........ '  ,11      .  '"..  .'
  Furthering "tha  Use of innovative Treatment
  Technotogtas in OSWER Programs.
  P691-921336/COH                See 1255
OSWER-9380.0-17FS
  Furthering  tha  Use of Innovative Treatment
  Techncjogtes In OSWER Programs.
  P§|i-921366/CDH                See 1256
OSWER-9380.6-19
  Innovative  Troatmont  Technologies:   Semi-
  Annual Status  Report, January  1991.  Rrst
  PS91-921290/CDH               See 1274
OSWER-9380.0-48
  Suporfuod  Innovative  Technology  Evaluation
  Technology Demonstration Summary: Chemfix
  SoWfieaUon/Stabiiizatlon Process, Clackamas,
  Oregon.
  PS91-921373/CDH               See 1564
OSf 16^380.1-07 III  ',"~  ........ ',',  1'" ."
  Accessing Fedora! Data Bases for Contaminat-
  ad Site Qoan-Up Technologies.
  PS91-821288/CDH               See 1188
OSWER-9380.1-OS
  Btbjography of Federal Reports and Publica-
  tions  Describing  Alternative  and  Innovative
   Treatment Technologies for Corrective Action
   and Site Remediation.
   PB91-921293/CDH               See 1206
 OSWER-9380.1-10FS
   Characterization Protocol for Radioactive Con-
   taminated Soils.
   PB92-963354/CDH               See 1494
 OSWER-9380.1-12
   Vendor Information Form to be Completed for
   Participation in the: Vendor Information System
   for   Innovative   Treatment   Technologies
   (VISITT).
   PB91-921289/CDH               See 1369
 OSWER-9380.1-13
   Survey   of  Materials-Handling  Technologies
   Used at Hazardous Waste Sites.
   PB91-921283/CDH               See 1323
 OSWER-9380.1-14
   Technical Support Services for Superfund Site
   Remediation. Second Edition.
   PB91-921285/CDH               Sea 1335
 OSWER-9380.3-08FS
   Regional Guide: Issuing Site-Specific Treatabil-
   ity Variances  for Contaminated  Soils  and
   Debris from Land Disposal Restrictions (LDRs).
   PB92-963284/CDH               See 1528
 OSWER-9380.7-01FS
   Guide to Pump and Treat Groundwater Reme-
   diation Technology.
   PB91-921356/CDH               See 1462
 OSWER-9380.7/03A
   Superfund  Engineering Issue: Treatment  of
   Lead-Contaminated Soils.
   PB91-921291/CDH               See 1535
 OSWER-9800.1-01
   Limiting  Lead Transfers  to Private  Parties
   during Discrete Phases of the Remedial Proc-
   ess.
   PB92-963602/CDH               See 0571
 OSWER-9800.3
   Superfund Desk Reference for Municipalities.
   PB91-193409/CDH               See 0486
 OSWER-9832.11FS
   Summary of 'Guidance on Documenting Deci-
   sions Not to Take Cost Recovery Actions'.
   PB91-228338/CDH               See 0874
 OSWER-9832.12-1A
   Supplemental Guidance on Federal Superfund
   Liens.
   PB93-963618/CDH               See 0885
 OSWER-9832.18
   Written  Demand for  Recovery of Costs  In-
   curred Under the Comprehensive Environmen-
   tal Response, Compensation, and  Liability Act
   (CERCLA).
   PB91-228742/CDH               See 0895
 OSWER-9832.22
   Interim Cashout Settlement Procedures.
   PB92-963609/CDH               See 0558
 OSWER-9833.5
   Guidance  on  Procedures  for   Submitting
   CERCLA Section 106(b) Reimbursement Peti-
   tions  and on EPA Review of Those Petitions.
   PB92-963610/CDH               See 0555
 OSWER-9833.06
:   Model Administrative Order on Consent for Re-
   moval Actions.
   PB93-963605/CDH               See 0574
 OSWER-9833.07
   Model Unilateral Administrative Order for Re-
   moval Response Activities.
   PB93-963606/CDH               See 0579
                                                                                         OSWER-9834.6FS
                                                                                           Policy Towards Owners of Residential Property
                                                                                           at Superfund Sites.
                                                                                           PB92-963615/CDH                See 0587
                                                                                         OSWER-9834.7-1C
                                                                                           Methodology for Early Da Minimis Waste Con-
                                                                                           tributor Settlements  under  CERCLA Section
                                                                                                                          See 0573
                                                                                           PB92-963607/CDH
OSWER-9834.7-1D
  Streamlined Approach for Settlements with De
  Minimis  Waste Contributors under CERCLA
  Section 122(g)(1)(A).
  PB93-963617/CDH               See 0870
OSWER-9834.11FS
  Overview of the Off-Site Policy for OSCs and
  RPMs.
  PB92-963603/CDH               See 0433
OSWER-9834.17
  Guidance on CERCLA Settlements with De Mi-
  cromis Waste Contributors.
  PB93-963619/CDH               See 0547
OSWER-9835.4-2B
  Accelerating Potentially Responsible Party Re-
  medial Design Starts: Implementing the 30-Day
  Study.
  PB92-963608/CDH               See 0509
OSWER-9835.4FS
  Summary of 'Interim  Guidance: Streamlining
  the CERCLA Settlement Decision Process'.
  PB91-228270/CDH               See 0875
OSWER-9835.9
  Guidance on Landowner Liability under Section
  107(a)(1)  of CERCLA, De Minimis Settlements
  under Section  122(g)(1)(B)  of CERCLA, and
  Settlements with  Prospective Purchasers  of
  Contaminated Property.
  PB91-139444/CPH               See 0552
OSWER-9835.12-01A
  Revised  Policy on  Discretionary Information
  Release under CERCLA.
  PB93-963610/CDH               See 0600
OSWER-9835.15B
  New Policy on  Performance of Risk  Assess-
  ments during Remedial Investigation Feasibility
  Studies (RI/FS) Conducted by Potentially Re-
  sponsible Parties (PRPs).
  PB93-963620/CDH               See 1061
OSWER-9835.16
  Guidance on Preparing Waste-in Lists and Vol-
  umetric Rankings for Release to Potentially
  Responsible Parties (PRPs) under CERCLA.
  PB92-963606/CDH               See 0554
OSWER-9837.2B
  Enforcement Project  Management Handbook.
  PB93-963602/CDH               See 0533
OSWER-9839.1FS
  Summary of 'Interim  Guidelines for Preparing
  NBARs'.
  PB91-228304/CDH               See 0876
OSWER-9850.0-1
  Endangerment Assessment Guidance.
  PB92-101997/CDH               See 0528
OSWER-9850.1
  Endangerment Assessment Handbook.
  PB92-102144/CDH               See 0530
OSWER-9972.00
  Roles and Responsibilities of Regional  Project
  Officers,  Zone Project Officers, Work Assign-
  ment Managers and  Contracting  Officers  for
NU-32

-------
                                                       NUMBER INDEX
                                                                   PB90-142373/CDH
  the RCRA Enforcement, Permitting and Assist-
  ance Contracts (REPA).
  PB94-963614/CDH               See 0070
OSWR DIRECTIVE-9200.31
  Superfund  Emergency Response Actions: A
  Summary  of  Federally-Funded   Removals.
  Volume 1.
  PB90-197310/CDH               See 0316
OWPE-92-CE-001C
  CERCLA Enforcement  Policy Compendium
  Update.
  PB92-963623/CDH               See 0516
PB82-191990/CDH
  Notification  of   Hazardous  Substance Sites
  (Section 103(c)).
  PB82-191990/CDH               See 1147
PB82-213984/CDH
  Notification  of  Hazardous Waste Sites  Re-
  quired Under Section 103(c) of the  Compre-
  hensive  Environmental Response, Compensa-
  tion and Liability Act (CERCLA) of 1980.
  PB82-213984/CDH               See 1173
PB82-213992/CDH
  Notification  of  Hazardous Waste Sites  Re-
  quired Under Section 103(c) of the  Compre-
  hensive  Environmental Response, Compensa-
  tion and Liability Act (CERCLA) of 1980: EPA
  Region 1.
  PB82-213992/CDH               See 1174
PB82-214008/CDH
  Notification  of   Hazardous Waste Sites  Re-
  quired Under Section 103(c) of the  Compre-
  hensive Environmental Response, Compensa-
  tion and Liability Act (CERCLA) of 1980: EPA
  Region 2.
  PB82-214008/CDH                See 1175
PB82-214016/CDH
  Notification of   Hazardous Waste Sites  Re-
  quired  Under Section 103(c) of the  Compre-
  hensive Environmental Response, Compensa-
  tion and Liability Act (CERCLA) of 1980: EPA
  Region 3.
  PB82-214016/CDH                See 1176
PB82-214024/CDH
  Notification  of  Hazardous Waste Sites  Re-
  quired  Under Section 103(c)  of the  Compre-
  hensive Environmental Response, Compensa-
  tion and Liability Act (CERCLA) of 1980:  EPA
  Region 4.
  PB82-214024/CDH                See 1177
PB82-214032/CDH
  Notification  of  Hazardous  Waste Sites  Re-
  quired  Under Section 103(c)  of the Compre-
  hensive Environmental Response, Compensa-
  tion and Liability Act (CERCLA) of 1980:  EPA
  Region  5.
  PB82-214032/CDH                See 1178
 PB82-214040/CDH
  Notification  of  Hazardous  Waste Sites Re-
  quired Under Section 103(c)  of the Compre-
  hensive Environmental Response, Compensa-
  tion and Liability Act (CERCLA) of 1980:  EPA
  Region  6.
   PB82-214040/CDH                See 1179
 PB82-214057/CDH
   Notification  of  Hazardous  Waste  Sites Re-
   quired  Under Section 103(c)  of  the Compre-
   hensive Environmental Response, Compensa-
   tion and Liability Act (CERCLA) of 1980: EPA
   Region 7.
   PB82-214057/CDH                See 1180
 PB82-214065/CDH
   Notification  of  Hazardous  Waste Sites Re-
   quired  Under Section 103(c) of the  Compre-
  hensive Environmental Response, Compensa-
  tion and Liability Act (CERCLA) of 1980: EPA
  Region 8.
  PB82-214065/CDH               See 1181
PB82-214073/CDH
  Notification  of  Hazardous Waste  Sites  Re-
  quired Under Section  103(o) of the Compre-
  hensive Environmental Response, Compensa-
  tion and Liability Act (CERCLA) of 1980: EPA
  Region 9.
  PB82-214073/CDH               See 1182
PB82-214081/CDH
  Notification  of  Hazardous Waste  Sites  Re-
  quired Under Section  103(c) of the Compre-
  hensive Environmental Response, Compensa-
  tion and Liability Act (CERCLA) of 1980: EPA
  Region 10.
  PB82-214081/CDH               See 1183
PB89-158810/CDH
  Technology Evaluation Report  SITE  Program
  Demonstration  Test,   HAZCON  Solidification,
  Douglassville, Pennsylvania. Volume 1.
  PB89-158810/CDH               See 1569
PB90-103516/CDH
  Evaluation of Modifications to Extraction  Pro-
  cedures Used  in  Analysis of  Environmental
  Samples from Superfund Sites.
  PB90-103516/CDH               See 1247
PB90-106428/CDH
  Assessment of International Technologies for
  Superfund  Applications:  Technology  Review
  and Trip Report Results.
  PB90-106428/CDH               See 1197
PB90-108242/CDH
  Use of 'Selenastrum capricornutum' to Assess
  the Toxicity Potential  of  Surface and Ground
  Water Contamination  Caused  by Chromium
  Waste.
  PB90-108242/CDH                See 1367
PB90-108549/CDH
  ARCS (Alternative Remedial Contract  Strategy)
  Contracts Users' Manual.
  PB90-108549/CDH                See 0019
PB90-113093/CDH
  EPA/ORD  (Environmental Protection Agency/
  Office of Research  and  Development)  Role
  and Perspective in Sediment Research.
  PB90-113093/CDH               See 1585
PB90-113291/CDH
  In-situ Stabilization/Solidification of PCB (Poly-
  chlorinated Biphenyls)-Contaminated Soil.
  PB90-113291/CDH               See 1556
PB90-113374/CDH
  Air/Superfund  National  Technical  Guidance
  Study Series.  Volume  1. Application of Air
  Pathway Analyses for  Superfund Activities.
  PB90-113374/CDH               See  1390
 PB90-113382/CDH
  Air/Superfund  National  Technical   Guidance
  Study Series. Volume  4. Procedures for Disper-
  sion Modeling and Air Monitoring for Superfund
  Air Pathway Analysis.
   PB90-113382/CDH               See  1394
 PB90-119744/CDH
  Terra Vac In situ Vacuum Extraction System:
   Applications Analysis Report.
   PB90-119744/CDH                See  1355
 PB90-120049/CDH
   Toxicity  Bioassay and Eluate  Heavy Metals
   Analysis Results of the Bench Scale Stabiliza-
   tion Study of  Soils  from the  United Chrome
   Superfund NPL (National Priority List) Site Cor-
   vallis, Oregon.
   PB90-120049/CDH                See 1546
PB90-126665/CDH
  Terra Vac In situ Vacuum Extraction System:
  Applications Analysis Report.
  PB90-126665/CDH               See 1356
PB90-127200/CDH
  International Conference on New Frontiers for
  Hazardous Waste Management (Third)  Pro-
  ceedings. Held in Pittsburgh,  Pennsylvania on
  September 10-13, 1989.
  PB90-127200/CDH               See 1278
PB90-127473/CDH
  Immobilization Technology Seminar:  Speaker
  Slide Copies and Supporting Information.
  PB90-127473/CDH               See 1555
PB90-127523/CDH
  Toxicological Profile for Trichloroethylene.
  PB90-127523/CDH               See 1361
PB90-129263/CDH
  Overview of Selected EPA (Environmental Pro-
  tection Agency) Regulations and Guidance Af-
  fecting  POTW  (Publicly Owned  Treatment
  Works) Management.
  PB90-129263/CDH                See 0432
PB90-129339/CDH
  Recent Advances in Risk Reduction Engineer-
  ing.
  PB90-129339/CDH                See 1064
PB90-130188/CDH
  Hydrogeology and Results of Aquifer Tests in
  the Vicinity  of a Hazardous-Waste  Disposal
  Site Near Byron, Illinois.
  PB90-130188/CDH                See 1463
PB90-132564/CDH
  Identification of  SARA  (Superfund Amend-
  ments and Reauthorization Act) Compounds in
  Adipose Tissue.
  PB90-132564/CDH                See 1055
PB90-137316/CDH
  Nature and Extent of Ecological Risks at Su-
  perfund Sites and RCRA (Resource Conserva-
  tion  and Recovery Act) Facilities (Executive
  Summary Included).
  PB90-137316/CDH               See 1060
PB90-137324/CDH
  Ecological   Risk  Assessment  Methods:  A
  Review and Evaluation of Past Practices in the
  Superfund and RCRA (Resource Conservation
  and  Recovery Act) Programs (Executive Sum-
  mary Included).
  PB90-137324/CDH               See 1024
PB90-137332/CDH
  Ecological Risk Management in the Superfund
  and  RCRA  (Resource Conservation and Re-
  covery Act) Programs.
  PB90-137332/CDH               See 1025
 PB90-137340/CDH
  Summary of Ecological Risks, Assessment
  Methods, and Risk Management Decisions in
  Superfund and RCRA (Resource Conservation
  and Recovery Act).
   PB90-137340/CDH               See 1077
 PB90-142357/CDH
   Health Effects Assessment for Styrene.
   PB90-142357/CDH               See 1046
 PB90-142365/CDH
   Health  Effects Assessment for 2,4,5-Trichloro-
   phenoxy Acetic Acid (2,4,5-T).
   PB90-142365/CDH                See 1050
 PB90-142373/CDH
   Updated Health  Effects Assessment for  Ace-
   tone.
   PB90-142373/CDH                See 1080
                                                                                                                            NU-33

-------
       PB90-142381/CDH
                                                              NUMBER INDEX
       P890-142361/CDH
         Health Effocts Assessment for Benzene.
         PB90-142381/CDH               See 1035
       PB90-142399/CDH
         Htwlth Effects Assessment for Cadmium.
         Pl9b-142399/CDH               See 1036
       PB90-142407/CDH
         Haalth Effects  Assessment for Carbon Tetra-
         cMorkta,
         PB90-142407/COH               See 1037
       PB90-142415/CDH
         Health Effects Assessment for Chlordane.
         PB90-142415/CDH               See 1038
     •  PSHM42423/CDH , ........ „_    n ;              ' .
        ' Hflajih' Effects Assessment'fpr Chloroform.
         P|W42423/CDH               See 1040
                       '                 '   "  .....
             ,                 „„ ;  „    ,,,.
        Hciirith Effect* Assessment W DDT.
        PB90-142431/COH
                                        See 1041
        Health  Effects  Assessment  for  Methylene
        CWorkJ*,
        PSSO-142449/CDH                See 1043
      PB90.142456/CDH
        Health Effocts Assessment for  Methyl  Ethyl
        Ketono.
        Pt90-142456/COH                See 1042
                                '
                     ;  .............................
        Hwtih  Effects  Assessment for Naphthalene.
        PB90-142464/CDH               See 1044
      PB90-142472/CDH
        Health Effocts Assessment for Phenol.
        PB80-142472/CDH               See 1045
      PB90-142480/CDH
        Hwith Effects Assessment for Tetrachloroeth-
        yfeno.
        PBJ.14984d/CDH               See 1476
       Franwwork  for Real-Time  Decision-Making:
       New, Bedford Harbor PJIpt Dredging Study.
,'',;  " PBgOjISOfag/COH	,	       See1S87
,!"';::*  PB9Q:i53875/CPH
       Maoagament Review  of the Superfund Pro-
       gram,
       PB90-1S3875/CDH                See 0101

     NU-34
  PB90-153883/CDH
   Management Review  of  the Superfund Pro-
   gram: Implementation Plan.
   PB90-153883/CDH                See 0102
  PB90-155581/CDH
   Risk  Assessment Guidance for  Superfund.
   Volume  1. Human Health Evaluation Manual.
   Part A.
   PB90-155581 /CDH                See 1065
  PB90-155599/CDH
   Risk  Assessment Guidance for  Superfund.
   Volume  2. Environmental Evaluation Manual.
   PB90-155599/CDH                See 1072
  PB90-159872/CDH
   Quality Assurance for the  SITE (Superfund In-
   novative  Technology  Evaluation)  Program
   Demonstrations.
   PB90-159872/CDH                See 0992
 PB90-160326/CDH
   National  Oil and  Hazardous Substances Pollu-
   tion Contingency Plan  (as  Published  in the
   Federal Register, March 8, 1990).
   PB90-160326/CDH                See 0145
 PB90-168063/CDH
   Characterization of Contaminated Soil from the
   Montclair/GIen Ridge, New Jersey, Superfund
   Sites.
   PB90-168063/CDH               See 1493
 PB90-174855/CDH
   SARA (Superfund Amendments and Reauthor-
   ization Act) Section 313  Roadmaps Data Base.
   User's Manual. Version 2.10.
   PB90-174855/CDH               See 0304
 PB90-182544/CDH
   Air/Superfund  National Technical  Guidance
   Series.   Superfund  Air Pathway   Analyses
   Review Criteria Checklists.
   PB9P-182544/CDH               See 1372
 PB90-183575/CDH
   Determining  Soil Response Action  Levels
   Based on Potential Contaminant Migration to
   Ground Water: A Compendium of Examples.
   PB90-183575/CDH               See 1497
 PB90-183799/CDH
   Forum on Innovative Hazardous Waste Treat-
   ment Technologies: Domestic and Internation-
   al.  Held  in Atlanta, Georgia on June  19-21,
   1989. Technical Papers.
   PB90-183799/CDH                See 1253
 PB90-185182/CDH
   Filtration of Ground Water Samples for Metals
  Analysis.
   PB90-185182/CDH                See 1454
 PB90-186339/CDH
  Operations and Research at the  U.S. EPA In-
  cineration Research Facility: Annual Report for
  FY89.
  PB90-186339/CDH                See 1482
 PB90-186396/CDH
  User's Guide to Contract Laboratory Program.
  PB90-186396/CDH                See 0078
 PB90-186495/CDH
  Technology Evaluation Report: SITE Program.
  CF Systems Organics Extraction System, New
  Bedford, Massachusetts. Volume 1.
  PB90-186495/CDH               See 1346
PB90-186503/CDH
  Technology Evaluation Report: SITE Program.
  CF Systems Organics Extraction System, New
  Bedford, Massachusetts. Volume 2.
  PB90-186503/CDH               See 1347
 PB90-187063/CDH
   New Approach and Methodologies for Charac-
   terizing  the  Hydrogeologic  Properties   of
   Aquifers.
   PB90-187063/CDH               See 1470
 PB90-187105/CDH
   Metals Testing Report: Metal Content of Envi-
   ronmental Samples from Region 4.
   PB90-187105/CDH               See 1282
 PB90-191545/CDH
   Guidelines  for Effective  Management of the
   Contract Laboratory Program. Part 1. Contract
   Award. Part 2. Contract Administration.
   PB90-191545/CDH               See 0028
 PB90-191750/CDH
   Technology Evaluation Report: SITE Program
   Demonstration Test, Soliditech, Inc., Solidifica-
   tion/Stabilization  Process. Volume 1.
   PB90-191750/CDH               See 1570
 PB90-191768/CDH
   Technology Evaluation Report: SITE Program
   Demonstration Test, Soliditech, Inc. Solidifica-
   tion/Stabilization  Process. Volume 2.
   PB90-191768/CDH               See 1571
 PB90-191966/CDH
   Emergency Response Cleanup Services Con-
   tracts (ERCS). Users Manual.
   PB90-191966/CDH               See 0024
 PB90-194721/CDH
   Superfund  Technical Assistance  Grants Pro-
   gram: Regional Guidance Manual.
   PB90-194721 /CDH               See 0504
 PB90-197310/CDH
   Superfund  Emergency  Response Actions:  A
   Summary   of  Federally-Funded   Removals.
   Volume 1,
   PB90-197310/CDH               See 0316
 PB90-197328/CDH
   Superfund  Emergency  Response Actions:  A
   Summary   of  Federally-Funded   Removals.
   Volume 2.
   PB90-197328/CDH               See 0317
 PB90-198177/CDH
   Technology Evaluation Report:  SITE Program
   Demonstration of  the Ultrox International Ultra-
   violet Radiation/Oxidation Technology.
   PB90-198177/CDH                See 1351
 PB90-202656/CDH
   Innovative  Operational  Treatment  Technol-
   ogies for Application to Superfund Site: Nine
   Case Studies.
   PB90-202656/CDH               See 1269
 PB90-204140/CDH
  Assessment of Technologies for the Remedi-
  ation of Radioactively Contaminated Superfund
  Sites.
  PB90-204140/CDH               See 1198
 PB90-204157/CDH
  Health and Safety Audit Guidelines: SARA Title
  I, Section 126.
  PB90-204157/CDH               See 0916
 PB90-204603/CDH
  Guidance on Applying the  Data Quality Objec-
  tives  Process for  Ambient Air  Monitoring
  Around Superfund Sites (Stages 1 and 2).
  PB90-204603/CDH               See 0988
PB90-204611/CDH
  Guidance on Applying the  Data Quality Objec-
  tives Process for  Ambient Air  Monitoring
  Around Superfund  Sites (Stage 3).
  PB90-2Q4611 /CDH               See 0987

-------
                                                       NUMBER INDEX
                                                                   PB90-243270/CDH
PB90-204728/CDH
  Development of Electro-Acoustic Soil Decon-
  tamination (ESD) Process for In situ Applica-
  tions.
  PB90-204728/CDH               See 1498
PB90-207317/CDH
  Air/Superfund National  Technical Guidance
  Study Series. Comparisons of Air Stripper Sim-
  ulations and Field Performance Data.
  PB90-207317/CDH               See 1376
PB90-213836/CDH
  Inorganic  Contract  Compliance  Screening
  System (ICCSS) Software for the PC (Version
  3/90) User Manual.
  PB90-213836/CDH               See 0035
PB90-213844/CDH
  Organic   Contract   Compliance  Screening
  System (OCCSS) Software for the PC (Version
  2/90) User Manual.
  PB90-213844/CDH               See 0048
PB90-214354/CDH
  Superfund  Emergency  Response Actions: A
  Summary  of Federally  Funded  Removals.
  Volume 3.
  PB90-214354/CDH               See 0318
PB90-216334/CDH
  Description of EPA SITE Demonstration of the
  HAZCON Stabilization  Process at the Doug-
  lassville, Pennsylvania Superfund Site.
  PB90-216334/CDH               See  15S2
PB90-216516/CDH
  Superfund  Innovative Technology Evaluation
  Program:  Progress  and  Accomplishments,
  Fiscal Year 1989. A Third Report to Congress.
  PB90-216516/CDH               See  1311
PB90-217621/CDH
  SITE Demonstration  of the  CHEMFIX  Solidifi-
  cation/Stabilization  Process at the Portable
  Equipment Salvage Company Site.
  PB90-217621/CDH               See 1559
PB90-221672/CDH
  Field Evaluation of the  UV/Oxidation Technol-
  ogy to Treat Contaminated  Groundwater. Pro-
  ceedings of the  National Conference (10th).
  Held in Washington,  DC. on November 27-29,
  1989.
  PB90-221672/CDH                See 1453
PB90-226069/CDH
  Guidance on EPA Oversight of Remedial De-
  signs and Remedial Actions Performed by Po-
  tentially Responsible Parties.
  PB90-226069/CDH                See 1128
PB90-229832/CDH
  Achieving  Greater Consistency between Sub-
  jective and Objective Risks.
  PB90-229832/CDH                See 1017
PB90-235938/CDH
  Communicating with  the Public About Hazard-
  ous Materials: An Examination  of Local  Prac-
  tice. Risk Communication Series.
  PB90-235938/CDH                See 0464
PB90-242306/CDH
  Rationale for the Assessment of Errors in the
  Sampling of Soils.
  PB90-242306/CDH               See 1526
PB90-242843/CDH
  Site Enforcement Tracking System  (SETS):
  PRP National Listing by Site.
   PB90-242843/CDH               See 0832
 PB90-242850/CDH
  Site Enforcement Tracking System  (SETS):
   PRP National Listing  Alphabetically by  Party
   Name.
   PB90-242850/CDH               See 0826
PB90-242868/CDH
  Site Enforcement Tracking System  (SETS):
  Frequency by Party Name Report.
  PB90-242868/CDH               See 0607
PB90-242884/CDH
  Site Enforcement Tracking System  (SETS):
  PRP Listing by Site for Connecticut.
  PB90-242884/CDH               See 0639
PB90-242892/CDH
  Site Enforcement Tracking System  (SETS):
  PRP Listing by Site for Maine.
  PB90-242892/CDH               See 0672
PB90-242900/CDH
  Site Enforcement Tracking System  (SETS):
  PRP Listing by Site for Massachusetts.
  PB90-242900/CDH               See 0678
PB90-242918/CDH
  Site Enforcement Tracking System  (SETS):
  PRP Listing by Site for New Hampshire.
  PB90-242918/CDH               See 0702
PB90-242926/CDH
  Site Enforcement Tracking System  (SETS):
  PRP Listing by Site for Rhode Island.
  PB90-242926/CDH               See 0787
PB90-242934/CDH
  Site Enforcement Tracking System  (SETS):
  PRP Listing by Site for Vermont.
  PB90-242934/CDH               See 0808
PB90-242959/CDH
  Site  Enforcement Tracking System  (SETS):
  PRP Listing by Site for New Jersey.
  PB90-242959/CDH               See 0705
PB90-242967/CDH
  Site  Enforcement Tracking System  (SETS):
  PRP Listing by Site for New York.
  PB90-242967/CDH               See 0711
PB90-242975/CDH
  Site  Enforcement  Tracking System  (SETS):
  PRP Listing by Site for Puerto Rico.
  PB90-242975/CDH               See 0735
PB90-242991/CDH
  Site  Enforcement  Tracking System  (SETS):
  PRP Listing by Site for Delaware.
  PB90-242991/CDH               See 0642
PB90-243007/CDH
  Site  Enforcement Tracking System  (SETS):
  PRP Listing by Site for Maryland.
  PB90-243007/CDH               See 0675
PB90-243015/CDH
  Site  Enforcement Tracking System  (SETS):
  PRP Listing by Site for Pennsylvania.
  PB90-243015/CDH               See 0732
PB90-243023/CDH
  Site  Enforcement Tracking System  (SETS):
  PRP Site Listing by Site for Virginia.
  PB90-243023/CDH               See 0848
PB90-243031/CDH
  Site  Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
  PRP Listing by Site for West Virginia.
  PB90-243031/CDH                See 0816
PB90-243056/CDH
  Site  Enforcement Tracking  System (SETS):
  PRP Listing by Site for Alabama.
  PB90-243056/CDH                See 0621
PB90-243064/CDH
  Site  Enforcement Tracking  System (SETS):
  PRP Listing by Site for Florida.
  PB90-243064/CDH                See 0645
PB90-243072/CDH
  Site  Enforcement Tracking  System (SETS):
  PRP Listing by Site for Georgia.
  PB90-243072/CDH                See 0648
PB90-243080/CDH
  Site  Enforcement Tracking System  (SETS):
  PRP Listing by Site for Kentucky.
  PB90-243080/CDH               See 0666
PB90-243098/CDH
  Site  Enforcement Tracking System  (SETS):
  PRP Listing by Site for Mississippi.
  PB90-243098/CDH               See 0687
PB90-243106/CDH
  Site  Enforcement Tracking System  (SETS):
  PRP Listing by Site for North Carolina.
  PB90-243106/CDH               See 0714
PB90-243114/CDH
  Site  Enforcement Tracking System  (SETS):
  PRP Listing by Site for South Carolina.
  PB90-243114/CDH               See 0790
PB90-243122/CDH
  Site  Enforcement Tracking System  (SETS):
  PRP Listing by Site for Tennessee.
  PB90-243122/CDH               See 0796
PB90-243148/CDH
  Site  Enforcement Tracking System  (SETS):
  PRP Listing by Site for Illinois.
  PB90-243148/CDH               See 0654
PB90-243155/CDH
  Site  Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
  PRP  Listing by Site for Indiana.
  PB90-243155/CDH                See 0657
PB90-243163/CDH
  Site  Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
  PRP  Listing by Site for Michigan.
  PB90-243163/CDH                See 0681
PB90-243171/CDH
  Site  Enforcement  Tracking System (SETS):
  PRP  Listing by Site for Minnesota.
  PB90-243171/CDH                See 0684
PB90-243189/CDH
  Site  Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
  PRP Listing by Site for Ohio.
  PB90-243189/CDH                See 0723
PB90-243197/CDH
  Site  Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
  PRP Listing by Site for Wisconsin.
  PB90-243197/CDH                See 0819
PB90-243213/CDH
  Site  Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
  PRP Listing by Site for Arkansas.
  PB90-243213/CDH                See 0630
PB90-243221/CDH
  Site  Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
  PRP Listing by Site for Louisiana.
  PB90-243221/CDH                See 0669
PB90-243239/CDH
  Site  Enforcement Tracking  System (SETS):
  PRP Listing by Site for New Mexico.
  PB90-243239/CDH                See 0708
PB90-243247/CDH
  Site  Enforcement Tracking  System (SETS):
  PRP Listing by Site for Oklahoma.
  PB90-243247/CDH                See 0726
 PB90-243254/CDH
  Site  Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
  PRP Listing by Site for Texas.
  PB90-243254/CDH                See 0799
 PB90-243270/CDH
  Site Enforcement Tracking System  (SETS):
  PRP Listing by Site for Iowa.
  PB90-243270/CDH                See 0660
                                                                                                                           NU-35

-------
                PBSo-i243288/CDHil"
           NUMBER INDEX
                PB90-243288/CDH
                  Site  Enforcement  Tracking System  (SETS):
                  PRP Listing by Site for Kansas,
                  PB90-243288/CDH               See 0663
 PB90-245770/CDH
   Using the DNA Alkaline Unwinding Assay to
   Detect DNA Damage in Laboratory and Envi-
   ronmentally Exposed Cells and Tissues.
                             .
                  Sis  Enforcement  tracking System  (SETS):
                  PRP Ustlng by Site for Missouri.
                  PS90-243296/CDH               See 0690
                PB80-243304/CDH
                  Sita  Enforcement  Tracking System  (SETS):
                  PRP Ustlng by Site for Nebraska.
                  PB90-243304/CDH               See 0696
                PB90-243320/CDH
                  Sits  Enforcement  Tracking System  (SETS):
                  PHP Usting by Site for Colorado.
                  PB80-243320/COH               See 0636
                PB90-243338/CDH
                  Sla  Enforcement  Tracking System  (SETS):
                  PRP Usting by Site for Montana.
                  P890-243338/COH               Sea 0693
                PB90-243346/CDH
                  Stta  Enforcement  Tracking System  (SETS):
                  PHP Listing by Stta for North Dakota.
                  PB90-243348/CDH               See 0717
                PB90-243353/CDH
                  Stta  Enforcement  Tracking System  (SETS):
                  PRP Listing by Site for South Dakota.
              ..   PBOT-243353/CpJi ......................   See 0793
                PB90-243361/CDH
                  Sit* Enforcement  Tracking System  (SETS):
                  PRP Usting by Sila for Utah.
                  PBBO-243361/CDH               See 0805
                PB9j}-2-243486/COH               Sea 0813

               NU-36
 PB90-247651/CDH
  Toxicological Profile for Benzo(b)Fluoranthene.
  PB90-247651/CDH               See 1360
 PB90-249442/CDH
  Progress  Toward  Implementing  Superfund.
  Rscal Year 1988.
  PB90-249442/CDH               See 0299
 PB90-249533/CDH
  Planning for Sufficient Community Relations
  (Superfund Management Review: No. 43A).
  PB90-249533/CDH               See 0108
 PB90-249541/CDH
  Superfund Analytical Review and Oversight.
  PB90-249541/CDH               See 0995
 PB90-249558/CDH
  Decentralization  of Superfund Bottle  Reposi-
  tory Functions.
  PB90-249558/CDH               See 0985
 PB90-249590/CDH
  Standard Operating Safety Guides.
  PB90-249590/CDH               See 0924
 PB90-249616/CDH
  Discharge  of Wastewater from CERCLA Sites
  into POTWS.
  PB90-249616/CDH               See 0421
 PB90-249624/CDH
  CERCLA Off-Site Policy: Providing Notice  to
  Facilities.
  PB90-249624/CDH               See 0415
 PB90-249632/CDH
  CERCLA Off-Site Policy - Eligibility of Facilities
  in Assessment Monitoring.
  PB90-249632/CDH               See 0414
 PB90-249640/CDH
  Policy for Superfund Compliance with the
  RCRA Land Disposal Restrictions.
  PB9p-249640/CDH               See 0436
 PB90-249657/CDH .............. JI.M ........................ ,
  RI/FS Improvements Follow-Up.
  PB90-249657/CDH               See 1109
 PB90-249707/CDH
  Guidance on Oversight of PRP Performed RD/
  RA.
  PB90-249707/CDH               See 1130
 PB90-249715/CDH
  Emergency Response Notification System.
  PB90-249715/CDH               See 0927
 PB90-249723/CDH
  Revised  Interim  Final Guidance on "Indian" in- """
  volvement in the  Superfund Program.
  PB90-249723/CDH               See 0484
 PB90-249731/CDH
  Involvement of Superfund  Program Managers
  in Superfund Response Agreement Audits.
  PB90-249731/CDH               See 0099
PB90-249756/CDH
  Superfund  Innovative Technology Evaluation
  Program:   Technology  Profiles,  November
  1989.
  PB90-249756/CDH               See 1317
PB90-249772/CDH .....
  Guide  for Conducting Treatability  Studies
  under CERCLA.
  PB90-249772/CDH               See 1154
  PB90-249798/CDH
   Use of Office of Research and Development's
   Bioremediation Expertise in Superfund Remov-
   al Program.
   PB.9Q-24.9798/CpH.  . .         ,  See 1.016	
  PB90-252594/CDH
   Emerging  Technologies:  Bio-Recovery Sys-
   tems  Removal  and Recovery of Metal Ions
   from Groundwater.
   PB90-252594/CDH               See 1439
  PB90-252602/CDH
   Emerging  Technologies:  Bio-Recovery Sys-
   tems  Removal  and Recovery of Metal Ions
   from Groundwater. Appendices.
   PB90-252602/CDH               See 1440
  PB90-253816/CDH
   Assessment  of  Tentatively  Identified Com-
   pounds in Superfund Samples.
   PB90-253816/CDH               See 1199
  PB90-254988/CDH
   Evaluation of Emission Factors for Formalde-
   hyde  from Certain  Wood  Processing Oper-
   ations. Final Report, May-August 1989.
   PB90-254988/CDH               See 1410
  PB90-255449/CDH
   Mobile Incineration: An Analysis of the Indus-
   try.
   PB90-255449/CDH               See 1480
  PB90-255662/CDH
   Air/Superfund  National  Technical  Guidance
   Study  Series. Development of Example Proce-
   dures  for Evaluating  the Air  Impacts of Soil
   Excavation Associated with Superfund  Reme-
   dial Actions.
   PB90-255662/CDH               See 1380
  PB90-256686/CDH
   Some  Major Factors Important in Establishing
   Land  Use Policy for  Remediated  Superfund
   Sites.
   PB90-256686/CDH               See 0308
	PB90-256723/CDH	
   Ecosystem Effects of Superfund.  National Pri-
   ority List Sites  in Industrial  Landscapes:  A
   Framework for Policy Decisions.
 11 pB9p-256"728/CpH               SeeOJ35
" "PB 9'6-258302/CDH""""   		
   Accelerated Response at NPL Sites Guidance
   (Superfund Management Review:  Recommen-
   dation  No. 22).
   PB90-258302/CDH               See 0082
 PB90-258328/CDH
   CERCLIS Data Handling Support Policy State-
   ment.
   PB90-258328/CDH
                                  See 0013
 PB90-258336/CDH
.......  Model Performance  Standards for Superfund
   Project Officers, Deputy Project Officers, and
   Work  Assignment  Managers/Delivery  Order
   Officers.
   PB90-258336/CDH                See 0045
 PB9b-258344/CDH
   OSWER Integrated  Health and Safety Policy.
   PB90-258344/CDH                See 0920
 PB90-258369/CDH
   Scoper's  Notes: An RI/FS  Costing Guide.
   Bringing in a Quality RI/FS on Time and Within
   Budget.
   PB90-258369/CDH                See 1117
   American  Combustion  Pyretron  Destruction
   System. Applications Analysis Report.
   PB9P-258427/CDH    ........     See.,1193,,,
     "•  't" I1!:'1 :'•:''   ' '- '     '•      ' "*' '••- '!' .....

-------
                                                      NUMBER INDEX
                                                                  PB90-273962/CDH
PB90-258476/CDH
  Analysis  of Treatability  Data for  Soil  and
  Debris: Evaluation of Land Ban Impact on Use
  of Superfund Treatment Technologies.
  PB90-258476/CDH                See 1488
PB90-258484/CDH
  ROD Annual Report, FY 1989.
  PB90-258484/CDH                See 1111
PB90-261835/CDH
  Guidance Documents Relating to Landfills and
  Contaminants.
  PB90-261835/CDH                See 1259
PB90-262999/CDH
  Remediation Completed:  But Is the Ground-
  water Meeting the Safe Drinking Water Act Re-
  quirements. Haztech International 90.  Held in
  Houston, Texas on May 8-10, 1990.
  PB90-262999/CDH                See 1473
PB90-264136/CDH
  Management Systems Review of the Super-
  fund RI/FS: Opportunities for Streamlining.
  PB90-264136/CDH                See 1101
PB90-268509/CDH
  Forum on Innovative Hazardous Waste Treat-
  ment Technologies:  Domestic and Internation-
  al. Held in Atlanta, Georgia on June 19-21,
  1989. Abstract Proceedings.
  PB90-268509/CDH                See 1252
PB90-268517/CDH
  Superfund  Ground  Water Issue. Contaminant
  Transport in Fractured Media: Models for Deci-
  sion Makers.
  PB90-268517/CDH                See 1477
PB90-269069/CDH
  Technology Evaluation  Report:  International
  Waste Technologies/Geo-Con In situ Stabiliza-
  tion/Solidification. Volume 3. Update Report.
  PB90-269069/CDH               See 1567
PB90-269077/CDH
  Technology Evaluation  Report:  International
  Waste Technologies/Geo-Con In situ Stabiliza-
  tion/Solidification. Volume 4. Update Report.
  PB90-269077/CDH               See 1568
PB90-269085/CDH
  International Waste Technologies/Geo-Con In
  situ  Stabilization/Solidification:  Applications
  Analysis Report.
  PB90-269085/CDH               See 1557
PB90-270588/CDH
  Air/Superfund National  Technical  Guidance
  Study Series. Volume 2. Estimation of Baseline
  Air Emissions at Superfund Sites (Revised).
  PB90-270588/CDH               See 1392
PB90-272501/CDH
  OSWER Comparative Risk Project. Executive
  Summary and Overview.
  PB90-272501/CDH               See 1062
PB90-272535/CDH
  CERCLA Compliance with Other Laws Manual.
  Part 1. Interim Final.
  PB90-272535/CDH               See 0409
PB90-272543/CDH
  CERCLA Compliance with Other Laws Manual:
  CERCLA Compliance with State Requirements.
  PB90-272543/CDH               See 0405
PB90-272550/CDH
  CERCLA Compliance with Other Laws Manual:
  Summary and Part  2. CAA, TSCA, and Other
  Statutes.
  PB90-272550/CDH               See 0411
PB90-272568/CDH
  Guidelines  for Effective Management of the
  Contract Laboratory Program.
  PB90-272568/CDH               See 0027
PB90-272576/CDH
  Guide on Remedial Actions for Contaminated
  Ground Water.
  PB90-272576/CDH               See 1461
PB90-272584/CDH
  Mandatory  Training  Requirements  for QCSs
  and RPMs.
  PB90-272584/CDH               See 0104
PB90-272592/CDH
  Mandatory  Community Relations Training. Su-
  perfund Management Review Implementation
  Product (Recommendation: No. 43.P(i)).
  PB90-272592/CDH               See 0103
PB90-272618/CDH
  Notification of Out-of-State Shipments of Su-
  perfund Site Wastes.
  PB90-272618/CDH               See 0429
PB90-272634/CDH
  Data  Quality  Objectives  for  Remedial  Re-
  sponse Activities: Development Process. Ex-
  ample Scenario: RI/FS Activities at a Site with
  Contaminated Soils and Ground Water.
  PB90-272634/CDH               See 0980
PB90-272642/CDH
  RI/FS Improvements.
  PB90-272642/CDH               See 1108
PB90-272659/CDH
  Advancing  the Use of Treatment Technologies
  for Superfund Remedies.
  PB90-272659/CDH               See 1191
PB90-272667/CDH
  Control of  Air Emissions  from Superfund Air
  Strippers at Superfund Groundwater Sites.
  PB90-272667/CDH               See 1399
PB90-272675/CDH
  Feasibility Study: Detailed Analysis of Remedi-
  al Action Alternatives.
  PB90-272675/CDH               See 1088
PB90-272683/CDH
  Expediting  Remedial Construction.
  PB90-272683/CDH               See 1127
PB90-272691/CDH  ,
  Removal Cost Management System: Version
  3.2.
  PB90-272691/CDH               See 1009
PB90-272709/CDH
  Guidelines for the Cleanup of Clandestine Drug
  Laboratories.
  PB90-272709/CDH               See 1007
PB90-272717/CDH
  Audits and the Superfund Program Manager.
  PB90-272717/CDH               See 0086
PB90-272725/CDH
  Status of State Involvement in the Superfund
  Program, FY 80 to FY 89.
  PB90-272725/CDH               See 0114
PB90-272733/CDH
  Analysis of  State Superfund Programs:  50-
  State Study.
  PB90-272733/CDH               See 0447
PB90-273731/CDH
  Superfund  Responsiveness Summaries (Super-
  fund  Management Review: Recommendation
  Number 43E).
  PB90-273731/CDH               See 0125
PB90-273749/CDH
  Community Relations: Use of Senior Environ-
  mental Employees  in Superfund  (Superfund
  Management    Review:    Recommendation
  43.K.L).
  PB90-273749/CDH               See 0088
PB90-273756/CDH
  Role of Community Interviews in the Develop-
  ment of a Community Relations  Program for
  Remedial Response.
  PB90-273756/CDH               See 0485
PB90-273764/CDH
  Proposed Method to Evaluate the Effective-
  ness of Community Involvement in  Superfund
  (Superfund Management Review: Recommen-
  dation Number 43.A).
  PB90-273764/CDH               See 0109
PB90-273772/CDH
  Superfund Technical Assistance Grants.
  PB90-273772/CDH               See 0502
PB90-273780/CDH
  ARARs Q's and A's.
  PB90-273780/CDH               See 0398
PB90-273798/CDH
  CERCLA Compliance with Other Laws  Manual:
  Overview of ARARs - Focus on  ARAR Waiv-
  ers.
  PB90-273798/CDH               See 0408
PB90-273806/CDH
  CERCLA Compliance with Other Laws  Manual:
  CERCLA  Compliance with  the  CWA  and
  SDWA.
  PB90-273806/CDH               See 0406
PB90-273814/CDH
  ARAR's Q's and A's. Compliance with the Tox-
  icity Characteristics Rule. Part 1.
  PB90-273814/CDH               See 0396
PB90-273822/CDH
  Approval  of Long Term Contracting Strategy
  for   Superfund   (Superfund   Management
  Review: Recommendation E.2).
  PB90-273822/CDH               See 0018
PB90-273830/CDH
  Risk Assessment Guidance for  Superfund.
  Volume  1. Human Health Evaluation  Manual.
  Part A, April 1990.
  PB90-273830/CDH               See 1066
PB90-273855/CDH
  Guide  to  Developing  Superfund  Proposed
  Plans.
  PB90-273855/CDH               See 1099
PB90-273863/CDH
  Guide to Selecting Superfund  Remedial Ac-
  tions.
  PB90-273863/CDH               See 1100
PB90-273871/CDH
  Guidance on Expediting Remedial Design and
  Remedial Action.
  PB90-273871/CDH               See 1129
PB90-273889/CDH
  USAGE Preplaced and Rapid Response Con-
  tracts.
  PB90-273889/CDH               See 1139
PB90-273897/CDH
  EPA/USACE  Payment Process: Direct Cite/
  Revised Reimbursement Methods.
  PB90-273897/CDH              . See 1126
PB90-273954/CDH
  Political Subdivision Involvement in Superfund.
  PB90-273954/CDH               See 0479
PB90-273962/CDH
  Treatability Studies Contractor Work Assign-
  ments.
  PB90-273962/CDH               See 0076
                                                                                                                         NU-37

-------
 PB90-273970/CDH
 PBSO-273970/CDH
   Testability Studies Under CERCLA: An Over-
   view.
                       ,;,; ..... ;;   ,.    see 117?
   Technology Evaluation Report CHEMFIX Tech-
   notefltes, Inc., SoWiffcatton/StabiHzation Proc-
   «s», Ctackamas. Oregon. Volume 2.
   PB80-274127/CDH               See 1339
 P890-274184/CDH
   looovatlva technology: SoM Washing.
   PB90-274184/CDH               See 1515
                 ........................................
   Innovative Technology: In-situ Vitrification.
   PB80-274192/CDH               See 1514
 PB90-274200/CDH
   Inoovativtt f echnotogy: Slurry-Phase Biodegra-
   djfori,'  .,     " ; .........................
   P880-274200/CDH               See 1271
 PB90-274218/CDH
   Innovative Technology: BEST Solvent Extrac-
   tion Process.
   PBDO-274218/CDH               See 1270
 P890-274226/COH
   Innovative Technology: Glyoolate Dehalogena-
   tkm.
                    ;    . ^   . ', "   See 1513
                 [[[
   CERCLA CfinipliarKja with Other Laws Manual:
   Gokte to Manual.
   PB9b-274242/ODH                See 0407
 PB9g-274259/CDH           /     /  ^   ".'
   CgFfCLA CormJllanca with Other Laws Manual:
   BalA  ARABS-Focus  on  Closure Require-
   rrHnJs,,  [[[
   PB§0-274259/CDH                See 0410
                   ™         '     ''"''
                     ,              .
  ABARS Q's and A's: Compiance with Federal
  Water Quality Criteria.
  PB90.274267/CDH               See 0399
 PB90-274275/CDH
  Long-Term Contracting Strategy for Superfund.
  PS90-274275/CDH               See 0042
               Asbestos Assessment Manual.
  Superfund Method for the Determination of As-
  bestos In Ambient Air. Part 1 . Method.
  PB90-274283/COH               See 1027
PB90-274291/CDH
  Environmental Asbestos Assessment Manual.
  Suportund Method for the Determination of As-
  bttta In Ambtont Afr. Part 2. Technical Back-
  ground Document.
  PB90-274291/CDH               See 1028
PB9S274317/CDH
  intwlm RCRA/CERCLA Guidance  on Non-
  Contiguous Sites and On-Site Management on
  Wasta and Treatment Residue.
  PB90-274317/CDH               See 0427
P890-274325/CDH
  Suparfund  LDR  Guide No.  1: Overview of
  RCRA Land DJsposal Restrictions (LDRs).
  PBao.274325/CDH               See 04/40
PB8S274333/CDH
  Su|3flrfund LDR Guide No^  2: Complying  with
  thj ..... Calfprnja List ResblctiODS under Land Dis-
       RestricHons (LDRs).
                        t ......... ,  ,    5,6,60441
  Suptrfund LDR Guide No. 3: Treatment Stand-
  ards and Minimum Technology Requirements
  toxior Land Disposal Restrictions (LDRS).
  P890-274341/CDH               See 0442
            NUMBER INDEX
 PB90-274358/CDH
   Superfund LDR Guide No. 4: Complying with
   the Hammer Restrictions under Land Disposal
   Restrictions (LDRs).
   PB90-274358/CDH               See 0443
 PB90-274366/CDH
   Superfund  LDR  Guide  No.  5:  Determining
   When Land  Disposal Restrictions (LDRs)  Are
   'Applicable' to CERCLA Response Actions.
   PB9Q-274366/CDH               See 0444
 PB90-274374/CDH
   Guide to Delisting of RCRA Wastes for Super-
   fund Remedial Responses.
   PB90-274374/CDH               See 0422
 PB90-274382/CDH
   Use of Removal Approaches to Speed Up  Re-
   medial Action Projects.
   PB90-274382/CDH               See 1140
 PB90-274390/CDH
   Getting Ready: Scoping the RI/FS.
   PB90-274390/CDH                See 1092
 PB90-274408/CDH
   Remedial  Investigation:  Site  Characterization
   and Treatability Studies.
   PB90-274408/CDH                See 1106
 PB90-274416/CDH
   Feasibility Study: Development and Screening
   of Remedial Action Alternatives.
   PB90-274416/CDH
 PB90-274424/CDH
   Streamlining the RI/FS for CERCLA  Municipal
   Landfill Sites.
   PB90-274424/CDH               See 1118
 PB90-274432/CDH
   Guide on Remedial Actions at Superfund Sites
   with PGB Cgntam|nation,
   PB90-274432/CDH               See 1262
 PB90-274440/CDH
   Evaluation of Ground-Water Extraction Reme-
   dies. Volume 2. Case Studies 1-19.
   PB90-274440/CDH               See 1446
 PB90-274457/CDH
   Evaluation of Ground-Water Extraction Reme-
   dies. Volume 3. General Site Data: Data Base
   Reports.
   PB90-274457/CDH               See 1447
 PB90-274465/CDH
   Final Guidance on Implementation of the 'Con-
   sistency' Exemption to the Statutory Limits on
   Removal Actions.
   PB90-274465/CDH               See 1004
 PB90-274473/CDH
  Superfund Removal Procedures: Action Memo-
  randum Guidance.
  PB90-274473/CDH               See 1012
 PB90-274481/CDH
  Quality Assurance/Quality Control  Guidance
  for Removal Activities: Sampling QA/QC Plan
  and Data Validation Procedures.
  PB90-274481/CDH               See 0993
 PB90-274499/CDH
  Criminal Investigations and the Superfund Pro-
  gram.
  PB90-274499/CDH              See 0469
PB90-274507/CDH
  CERCLA Waste Capacity Assurance.
  PB90-274567/CbH               See 0131
PB90-274515/CDH
  ARCS  Construction Contract Modification Pro-
  cedures.
  PB90-274515/CDH               See 0020
            PB90-274523/CDH
             Hazmat Team Planning Guidance.
             PB90-274523/CDH               See 0915
            PB90-274531/CDH
             CERCLA Site Discharges to POTWs: Guidance
             Manual.
             PB90-274531/CDH               See 1576
            PB90-502618/CDH
             Site  Enforcement  Tracking System  (SETS)
             (Region 1) (for Microcomputers).
             PB90-502618/CDH               See 0850
            PB90-502626/CDH
             Site  Enforcement  Tracking System  (SETS)
             (Region 2) (for Microcomputers).
             PB90-502626/CDH               See 0852
            PB90-502634/CDH
             Site  Enforcement  Tracking System  (SETS)
             (Region 3) (for Microcomputers).
             PB90-502634/CDH               See 0854
            PB90-502642/CDH
             Site  Enforcement  Tracking System  (SETS)
             (Region 4) (for Microcomputers).
             PB90-502642/CDH               See 0856
            PB90-502659/CDH
             Site  Enforcement  Tracking System  (SETS)
             (Region 5) (for Microcomputers).
             PB90-502659/CDH               See 0858
See 1089   PB90-502667/CDH
             Site  Enforcement Tracking  System  (SETS)
             (Region 6) (for Microcomputers).
             PB90-502667/CDH               See 0860
           PB90-502675/CDH
             Site  Enforcement Tracking  System  (SETS)
             (Region 7) (for Microcomputers).
             PB90-502675/CDH               See 0862
           PB9u:562683/CbH
             Site  Enforcement Tracking  System  (SETS)
             (Region 8) (for Microcomputers).
             PB90-502683/CDH               See 0864
           PB90-502691/CDH
             Site  Enforcement Tracking  System  (SETS)
             (Region 9) (for Microcomputers).
             PB90-502691/CDH               See 0866
           PB90-502709/CDH
             Site  Enforcement Tracking  System  (SETS)
             (Region 10) (for Microcomputers).
             PB90-502709/CDH               See 0868
           PB90-591310/CDH
             CERCLIS (Comprehensive  Environmental Re-
             sponse, Compensation, and Liability Informa-
             tion System) Site Location Extract.
             PB90-591310/CDH               See 0012
           PB90-591690/CDH
             Organic  Contract  Compliance  Screening
             System  (OCCSS) Software (for Microcomput-
             ers).
             PB90-591690/CDH               See 0047
           PB90-591700/CDH
             Inorganic  Contract  Compliance  Screening
             System  (ICCSS)  Software  (for Microcomput-
             ers).
             PB90-591700/CDH               See 0034
           PB90-591780/CDH
             Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)
             (National) (for Microcomputers).
             PB90-591780/CDH               See 0613
           PB90-591790/CDH

-------
                                                       NUMBER INDEX
                                                                   PB91-131037/CDH
PB90-780115/CDH
  Enforcement Project Management Handbook.
  PB90-780115/CDH               See 0531
PB90-921100/CDH
  Health Effects Assessment Summary  Tables
  Fourth Quarter FY 1989.
  PB90-921100/GDH               See 1054
PB91-100800/CDH
  Revised Hazard Ranking System (HRS): Final
  Rule.
  PB91-100800/CDH               See 0380
PB91-102129/CDH
  Air/Superfund  National  Technical Guidance
  Study Series. Contingency Plans at Superfund
  Sites Using Air Monitoring.
  PB91-102129/CDH               See 1378
PB91-113845/CDH
  Applications Analysis Report:  SITE Program,
  CF Systems Organics Extraction System, New
  Bedford, Massachusetts.
  PB91 -113845/CDH               See 1196
PB91-125674/CDH
  Technology  Transfer  Needs  Assessment,
  1990.
  PB91-125674/CDH               See 1354
PB91-125997/CDH
  Air/Superfund National  Technical  Guidance
  Study Series. Air Stripper Design Manual.
  PB91-125997/CDH               See 1374
PB91-127696/CDH
  Technology Evaluation Report: Chemfix Tech-
  nologies,  Inc. Solidification/Stabilization Proc-
  ess, Clackamas, Oregon. Volume 1.
  PB91-127696/CDH               See 1566
PB91-129189/CDH
  Quantifying Effects in Ecological Site Assess-
  ments: Biological and  Statistical  Consider-
  ations.
  PB91-129189/CDH                See 1063
PB91-129759/CDH
  Ultrox International Ultraviolet Radiation/Oxida-
  tion Technology: Applications Analysis Report.
  PB91-129759/CDH                See 1364
PB91-129817/CDH
  Soliditech, Inc. Solidification/Stabilization Proc-
  ess:  Applications Analysis Report.
  PB91-129817/CDH                See 1562
PB91-130492/CDH
  Site  Enforcement Tracking System  (SETS):
  PRP National Listing  Alphabetically by  Party
  Name.
  PB91 -130492/CDH                See 0827
PB91-130518/CDH
  Site  Enforcement Tracking System  (SETS):
  Frequency by Party Name Report.
  PB91-130518/CDH                See 0608
PB91-130534/CDH
  Site  Enforcement Tracking System  (SETS):
  PRP Listing by Site for Connecticut.
  PB91-130534/CDH                See 0640
PB91-130542/CDH
  Site  Enforcement Tracking System  (SETS):
  PRP Listing by Site for Maine.
  PB91-130542/CDH                See 0673
PB91-130559/CDH
  Site  Enforcement Tracking System  (SETS):
  PRP Listing by Site for Massachusetts.
  PB91-130559/CDH                See 0679
 PB91-130567/CDH
  Site Enforcement Tracking System  (SETS):
  PRP Listing by Site for New Hampshire.
  PB91-130567/CDH               See 0703
PB91-130575/CDH
  Site  Enforcement  Tracking System  (SETS):
  PRP Listing by Site for Rhode Island.
  PB91-130575/CDH               See 0788
PB91-130583/CDH
  Site  Enforcement  Tracking System  (SETS):
  PRP Listing by Site for Vermont.
  PB91-130583/CDH               See 0809
PB91-130609/CDH
  Site  Enforcement  Tracking System  (SETS):
  PRP Listing by Site for New Jersey.
  PB91-130609/CDH               See 0706
PB91-130617/CDH
  Site  Enforcement  Tracking System  (SETS):
  PRP Listing by Site for New York.
  PB91 -130617/CDH               See 0712
PB91-130625/CDH
  Site  Enforcement  Tracking System  (SETS):
  PRP Listing by Site for Puerto Rico.
  PB91 -130625/CDH               See 0736
PB91-130641/CDH
  Site  Enforcement  Tracking System  (SETS):
  PRP  Listing by Site for Delaware.
  PB91 -130641 /CDH               See 0643
PB91-130658/CDH
  Site  Enforcement  Tracking System  (SETS):
  PRP  Listing by Site for Maryland.
  PB91-130658/CDH               See 0676
PB91-130666/CDH
  Site  Enforcement  Tracking System  (SETS):
  PRP  Listing by Site for Pennsylvania.
  PB91-130666/CDH              See 0733
PB91-130674/CDH
  Site  Enforcement  Tracking System  (SETS):
  PRP Listing by Site for Virginia.
  PB91-130674/CDH              See 0811
PB91-130682/CDH
  Site  Enforcement Tracking System  (SETS):
  PRP Listing by Site for West Virginia.
  PB91-130682/CDH              See 0817
PB91-130708/CDH
  Site  Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
  PRP Listing by Site for Alabama.
  PB91-130708/CDH               See 0622
PB91-130716/CDH
  Site  Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
  PRP Listing by Site for Georgia.
  PB91 -130716/CDH               See 0649
PB91-130724/CDH
  Site  Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
  PRP Listing by Site for Kentucky.
  PB91-130724/CDH               See 0667
PB91-130732/CDH
  Site  Enforcement Tracking  System (SETS):
  PRP Listing by Site for Mississippi.
  PB91-130732/CDH               See 0688
PB91-130740/CDH
  Site  Enforcement Tracking  System (SETS):
  PRP Listing by Site for North Carolina.
  PB91 -130740/CDH               See 0715
PB91-130757/CDH
  Site  Enforcement Tracking  System  (SETS):
  PRP Listing by Site for South Carolina.
  PB91-130757/CDH               See 0791
 PB91-130765/CDH
  Site  Enforcement Tracking System  (SETS):
  PRP Listing by Site for Tennessee.
   PB91 -130765/CDH               See 0797
 PB91-130781/CDH
  Site Enforcement Tracking System  (SETS):
   PRP Listing by Site for Illinois.
   PB91-130781/CDH               See 0655
PB91-130799/CDH
  Site  Enforcement Tracking System  (SETS):
  PRP Listing by Site for Indiana.
  PB91-130799/CDH               See 0658
PB91-130807/CDH
  Site  Enforcement Tracking System  (SETS):
  PRP Listing by Site for Michigan.
  PB91-130807/CDH               See 0682
PB91-130815/CDH
  Site  Enforcement Tracking System  (SETS):
  PRP Listing by Site for Minnesota.
  PB91 -130815/CDH               See 0685
PB91-130823/CDH
  Site  Enforcement Tracking System  (SETS):
  PRP Listing by Site for Ohio.
  PB91-130823/CDH               See 0724
PB91-130831/CDH
  Site  Enforcement Tracking System  (SETS):
  PRP Listing by Site for Wisconsin.
  PB91-130831/CDH               See 0820
PB91-130906/CDH
  Site  Enforcement Tracking  System  (SETS):
  PRP  Listing by Site for Arkansas.
  PB91 -130906/CDH               See 0631
PB91-130914/CDH
  Site  Enforcement  Tracking  System  (SETS):
  PRP  Listing by Site for Louisiana.
  PB91-130914/CDH               See 0670
PB91-130922/CDH
  Site  Enforcement  Tracking  System  (SETS):
  PRP  Listing by Site for New Mexico.
  PB91 -130922/CDH               See 0709
PB91-130930/CDH
  Site  Enforcement Tracking  System  (SETS):
  PRP  Listing by Site for Oklahoma.
  PB91-130930/CDH               See 0727
PB91-130948/CDH
  Site  Enforcement Tracking  System  (SETS):
  PRP Listing by Site for Texas.
  PB91-130948/CDH               See 0800
PB91-130963/CDH
  Site  Enforcement Tracking  System  (SETS):
  PRP Listing by Site for Iowa.
  PB91-130963/CDH               See 0661
PB91-130971/CDH
  Site  Enforcement Tracking  System (SETS):
  PRP Listing by Site for Kansas.
  PB91-130971/CDH                See 0664
PB91-130989/CDH
  Site  Enforcement Tracking  System (SETS):
  PRP Listing by Site for Missouri.
  PB91-130989/CDH                See 0691
PB91-130997/CDH
  Site  Enforcement Tracking  System (SETS):
  PRP Listing by Site for Nebraska.
  PB91-130997/CDH                See 0697
PB91-131011/CDH
  Site  Enforcement Tracking  System (SETS):
  PRP Listing by Site for Colorado.
  PB91-131011/CDH                See 0637
 PB91-131029/CDH
  Site  Enforcement Tracking  System (SETS):
  PRP Listing by Site for Montana.
  PB91-131029/CDH                See 0694
 PB91-131037/CDH
  Site  Enforcement Tracking  System  (SETS):
   PRP Listing by Site for North  Dakota.
   PB91-131037/CDH               See 0718
                                                                                                                           NU-39

-------
               P?9t-131045/CDH
                                                       NUMBER INDEX
ism
S4i
 PB91-131045/CPH
  S|«  Enfproement Irackftifl System  (SETS):
  Pig Listing by Site for South Dakota.
  Pa91-131045/COH               Sea 0794
 pBii-131052/CDH
  Sfto  Enforesmsnt Tracking System  (SETS):
  PHP Ustlng by Site for Utah.
  PB91-131052/CDH               See 0806
 PB9M31060/CDH
  Stt«  Enforcement Tracking System  (SETS):
  PRP Listing by SIta for Wyoming.
  PB91-131060/CDH               See 0823
 PB91-131086/CDH
  Stta  Enforcement Tracking System  (SETS):
  PRP Listing by Sfta for American Samoa.
  PB91-131088/CDH               See 0625
 PB91-131094/CDH
  S«s  Enforcement Tracking System  (SETS):
  PfiP Listing by Site for Arizona.
  PB0M31094/CDH               See 0628
 PB91-131102/CDH
  pHs  Enforcement Tracking System  (SETS):
  PRP Usting by Stta for California.
  PB9M31102/CDH               See 0634
 PB41-131110/CDH
  Sfto  Enforcoment Tracking System  (SETS):
  PRP  Ustlng by Stta for Nevada,
  PB91-131110/CDH               See 0700
PB9M31128/CDH
  Site  Enforcement  Tracking System  (SETS):
  PRP Listing by Site for Northern Marianas.
  PB91-131128/COH               See 0721
PB91-131136/CDH
  Stt*  Enforcement Tracking System  (SETS):
  PRP Listing by Site for Trust Territories.
 P9l-i31136/CDH               SeeOBOS
                Sflt ' EnfCfoonTent Bracking System "(SETS):
                PQP Listing by Site for Idaho.
                P891-131151/COH               Sea 0652
               PB91-131169/CDH
                SKe Enforcement Tracking System  (SETS):
                PRP Listing by Site for Oregon.
                PS91-131169/COH               See 0730
               PB9M31177/CDH
                S|* Enforcement Tracking System  (SETS):
                PRP Listing by Site for Washington.
                PB91-131177/CDH               See 0814
               PB91-131219/CDH
                Site Enforcement Tracking System  (SETS):
                PRP Ustlng by Site for Florida.
                PB91-131219/CDH               See 0646
               PB91-131326/CDH
                Hazardous Waste Superfund Collection: Data-
                base Thesaurus,.
               .....
              PB9I-131334/CDH "I  "I     .    ,! ..... ,"
                8j»  Enforcement  Tracking System  (SETS):
                PRP National Listing by Site.
                PB91-131334/CDH ...... ..........................       See 0833
              PB91-133249/CDH
                Ground Water Sampling for Metals Analyses.
                Suporfund Ground Water Issue.
                PB91-133249/CDH               See 1459
              PB91-133256/CDH
                Facilitated Transport. Series of Issue Papers
                (3rd).
                PB91-133258/CDH               See 1451

              NU-40
 PB91-138818/CDH
   Revision of CERCLA Civil Judicial Settlement
   Authorities under Delegations 14-13-B and 14-
   14:E.
   PB91-138818/CDH               See 0602
 PB91-138826/CDH
   Waiver of Concurrence on De Minimis Genera-
   tor Settlements.
   PB91-138826/CDH               See 0892
 PB91-138834/CDH
   Redelegation  of Civil Judicial  Settlement  Au-
   thorities under Delegation 14-13-B and 14-14-
   E.
   PB91 -138834/CDH               See 0593
 PB91-138842/CDH
   Superfund Enforcement  Strategy and Imple-
   mentation Plan.
   PB91-138842/CDH               See 0883
 PB91-1388S9/CDH
   Policy for Enforcement Actions against Trans-
   porters under CERCLA.
   PB91-138859/CDH               See 0584
 PB91-138867/CDH
   Entry and Continued Access under CERCLA.
   PB91-138867/CDH               See 0534
 PB91-138875/CDH
   Regional Oversight of Federal Facility Clean-
   ups under CERCLA.
   PB91-138875/CDH               See 0900
 PB91-138883/CDH
   Reporting and Exchange  of Information  on
   State Enforcement Actions at National Prior-
   ities List Sites.
   PB91-138883/CDH               See 0483
 PB91-138891/CDH
   Funding  of State Enforcement Related Activi-
   ties.
   PB91-138891/CDH                See 0474
 PB91-138909/CDH
   Authority to  Use CERCLA to Provide Enforce-
   ment Funding Assistance to States.
   PB91-1389P9/CDH                See 0450
 PB91-138917/CDH
   Interim  Final Guidance  Package  on Funding
   CERCLA State Enforcement Actions at NPL
   Sites.
   PB91-138917/CDH               See 0477
 PB91-138925/CDH
  Supporting State Attorneys General CERCLA
   Remedial and Enforcement Activities at NPL
  Sites.
   PB91-138925/CDH               See 0506
 PB91-138933/CDH
  Counting  State-Lead Enforcement NPL Sites
  Toward the CERCLA Section 116(e)  Remedial
  Action Start Mandate.
  PB91-138933/CDH               See 0468
 PB91-138941/CDH
  Cost Recovery Referrals.
  PB91 -138941 /CDH               See 0525
 PB91-138958/CDH
  Procedures  for   Documenting   Costs   for
  CERCLA Section 107 Actions.
  PB91-138958/CDH               See 0590
PB91-138966/CDH
  Cost Recovery Actions under CERCLA.
  PB91-138966/CDH               See 0524
PB91-138974/CDH
  Coordination of EPA and State Actions in Cost
  Recovery.
  PB91-138974/CDH               See 0522
 PB91-138982/CDH
   Cost Recovery Actions/Statute of Limitations.
   PB91 -138982/CDH                See 0523
 PB91-138990/CDH
   Policy on Recovering Indirect Cost in CERCLA
   Section 107 Cost Recovery Actions.
   PB91-138990/CDH                See 0585
 PB91-13900S/CDH
   Small Cost Recovery Referrals.
   PB91-139006/CDH                See 0869
 PB91-139014/CDH
   Guidance  Regarding  CERCLA  Enforcement
   against Bankrupt Parties.
   PB91 -139014/CDH                See 0556
 PB91-139022/CDH
   Revised Hazardous Waste  Bankruptcy Guid-
   ance.
   PB91 -139022/CDH                See 0598
 PB91-139030/CDH
   Liability of Corporate Shareholders  and Suc-
   cessor  Corporations  for  Abandoned  Sites
   Under the Comprehensive  Environmental Re-
   sponse, Compensation and Liability Act.
   PB91-139030/CDH                See 0570
 PB91-139048/CDH
   Guidance on  Documenting  Decisions  Not to
   Take Cost Recovery Actions.
   PB91-139048/CDH                See 0549
 PB91-139055/CDH
   Guidance on Federal Superfund Liens.
   PB91-139055/CDH                See 0551
 PB91-139063/CDH
   Superfund Cost Recovery Strategy.
   PB91-139063/CDH               See 0882
 PB91-139089/CDH
   Guidance on CERCLA 106(a) Unilateral Admin-
   istrative Orders for Remedial Designs and Re-
   medial Actions.
   PB91 -139089/CDH               See 0548
 PB91-139097/CDH
   Model Unilateral Order for  Remedial Design
  and Remedial Action.
  PB91 -139097/CDH               See 0580
 PB91-139105/CDH
  Issuance of Administrative Orders for Immedi-
  ate Removal Actions.
  PB91-139105/CDH               See 0567
 PB91-139113/CDH
  Consent Orders and  the Reimbursement Provi-
  sion Under Section 106(b) of CERCLA.
  PB91 -139113/CDH               See 0520
 PB91-139121/CDH
  Final Guidance on Administrative Records for
  Selecting CERCLA Response Actions.
  PB91 -139121 /CDH               See 0473
 PB91-139147/CDH
  Releasing Identities of Potentially Responsible
  Parties in Response to FOIA Requests.
  PB91-139147/CDH                See 0594
PB91-139162/CDH
  PRP Search Supplemental Guidance for Sites
  in the Superfund Remedial Program.
  PB91 -139162/CDH                See 0592
PB91-139170/CDH
  Transmittal of Guidance on  Use and Enforce-
  ment of  CERCLA Information  Requests and
  Administrative Subpoenas.
  PB91-139170/CDH                See 0887
                                 111    111
                                                                                                                               	Illll'i

-------
                                                      NUMBER INDEX
                                                                   PB91-139808/CDH
PB91-139188/CDH
  Procedural Guidance on Treatment of Insurers
  under CERCLA.
  PB91-139188/CDH               See 0589
PB91-139196/CDH
  Interim Guidance on Settlements with De Mini-
  mis Waste Contributors under Section  122(g)
  of SARA.
  PB91-139196/CDH               See 0562
PB91-139204/CDH
  Interim Model CERCLA Section 122(g)  (4) De
  Minimis Waste Contributor  Consent Decree
  and Administrative Order on Consent.
  PB91 -139204/CDH               See 0565
PB91-139212/CDH
  Methodologies for Implementation of CERCLA
  Section 122(g) (1) (A)  De Minimis Waste Con-
  tributor Settlements   Proposals  and  Agree-
  ments.
  PB91 -139212/CDH               See 0572
PB91-139220/CDH
  Covenants Not to Sue  under SARA.
  PB91-139220/CDH               See 0526
PB91-139238/CDH
  Evaluating Mixed Funding  Settlements under
  CERCLA.
  PB91-139238/CDH               See 0537
PB91-139246/CDH
  Interim Policy on Mixed Funding Settlements
  Involving  the Preauthorization of States or Po-
  litical Subdivisions.
  PB91-139246/CDH                See 0566
PB91-139253/CDH
  Interim Guidance on Notice Letters, Negotia-
  tions, and Information Exchange.
  PB91-139253/CDH  .              See 0560
PB91-139261/CDH
  Waiver of Headquarters Approval for Issuance
  of RD/RA Special Notice Letters at the Time
  of ROD Signature from OERR and OWPE.
  PB91 -139261 /CDH                See 0893
PB91-139279/CDH
  Model Notice Letters.
  PB91 -139279/CDH                See 0577
PB91-139287/CDH
  Revised  Procedures for Implementing  Off-Site
  Response Actions.
  PB91-139287/CDH               See 0601
 PB91-139295/CDH
  Off-Site Policy: RFA or Equivalent Investigation
  Requirement at RCRA Treatment and  Storage
  Facilities.
  PB91-139295/CDH               See 0431
 PB91-139311/CDH
   Municipal Settlements.
   PB91-139311/CDH               See 0583
 PB91-139329/CDH
   Interim CERCLA Settlement Policy.
   PB91-139329/CDH               See 0559
 PB91-139337/CDH
   Interim  Guidance on  Potentially Responsible
   Party Participation in Remedial Investigations
   and Feasibility Studies.
   PB91-139337/CDH               See 0561
 PB91-139345/CDH
   Guidance on Drafting  Consent Decrees in Haz-
   ardous Waste Cases.
   PB91 -139345/CDH               See 0550
 PB91-139352/CDH
   Revisions to the Interim Guidance on PRP Par-
   ticipation in Remedial Investigations and Feasi-
   bility Studies.
   PB91-139352/CDH               See 0603
PB91-139360/CDH
  Guidance of the Use of Stipulated Penalties in
  Hazardous Waste Consent Decrees.
  PB91-139360/CDH               See 0544
PB91-139378/CDH
  Administrative Order on Consent for Remedial
  Investigations/Feasibility Study.
  PB91 -139378/CDH               See 0510
PB91-139386/CDH
  Interim Guidance: Streamlining the  CERCLA
  Settlement Decision Process.
  PB91-139386/CDH               See 0563
PB91-139394/CDH
  Initiation of PRP-Financed Remedial Design in
  Advance of Consent Decree Entry (Final).
  PB91-139394/CDH               See 0557
PB91-139402/CDH
  EPA Interim Guidance on Indemnification of
  Superfund Response Action Contractors Under
  Section 119 of SARA.
  PB91-139402/CDH               See 0536
PB91-139410/CDH
  Guidance on Premium Payments  in CERCLA
  Settlements.
  PB91 -139410/CDH               See 0553
PB91-139428/CDH
  Guidance on CERCLA Section 106 Judicial Ac-
  tions.
  PB91 -139428/CDH               See 0546
PB91-139436/CDH
  Model Statement of Work for a Remedial In-
  vestigation and Feasibility Study Conducted by
  Potentially Responsible Parties.
  PB91 -139436/CDH               See 0578
PB91-139444/CDH
  Guidance on Landowner Liability under Section
  107(a)(1) of CERCLA, De Minimis Settlements
  under Section  122{g)(1)(B)  of CERCLA,  and
  Settlements with Prospective Purchasers of
  Contaminated Property.
  PB91-139444/CDH                See 0552
 PB91-139451/CDH
  Model Litigation Report  for CERCLA Sections
  106 and 107 and  RCRA Section 7003.
  PB91 -139451 /CDH                See 0576
 PB91-139469/CDH
  Releasing Information to Potentially Responsi-
  ble Parties at CERCLA Sites.
  PB91-139469/CDH                See 0595
 PB91-139477/CDH
  Comparative Analysis of Remedies Selected  in
  the Superfund Program during FY 87, FY 88
  and FY 89.
  PB91-139477/CDH                See 0519
 PB91-139485/CDH
  Submittal of Ten-Point Settlement Analyses for
  CERCLA Consent Decrees.
   PB91-139485/CDH                See 0871
 PB91-139493/CDH
   Performance of Risk Assessments in  Remedial
   Investigation/Feasibility  Studies (RI/FSs) Con-
   ducted  by Potentially  Responsible Parties
   (PRPs).
   PB91-139493/CDH               See 1102
 PB91-139519/CDH
   Community Relations during Enforcement Ac-
   tivities and Development of the Administrative
   Record.
   PB91 -139519/CDH                See 0465
 PB91-139527/CDH
   CERCLA  Community Relations Mailing Lists.
   PB91-139527/CDH                See 0451
PB91-139543/CDH
  Preparation of Hazardous Waste Referrals.
  PB91-139543/CDH               See 0588
PB91-139550/CDH
  Scope of the  CERCLA Petroleum Exclusion
  under Sections 101(14) and 104(a)(2).
  PB91-139550/CDH               See 0605
PB91-139600/CDH
  Site Classification Changes from Enforcement
  to Fund Lead.
  PB91-139600/CDH               See 0606
PB91-139642/CDH
  Guidance on Applicability of EPA Order 3500.1
  to CERCLA Staff.
  PB91-139642/CDH               See 0545
PB91-139659/CDH
  CERCLA  Implementation of the Training Re-
  quirements  of EPA Order 3500.1.  Inspector
  Training.
  PB91-139659/CDH               See 0518
PB91-139667/CDH
  Revised EPA  Guidance on Parallel Proceed-
  ings.
  PB91-139667/CDH               See 0597
PB91-139675/CDH
  Endangerment Assessment Guidance.
  PB91-139675/CDH               See 0527
PB91-139683/CDH
  Endangerment Assessment Handbook.
  PB91-139683/CDH               See 0529
PB91-139709/CDH
  Interim Guidance for Soil Ingestion Rates.
  PB91-139709/CDH                See 1057
PB91-139717/CDH
  Integrated Timeline for Superfund Site Man-
  agement (SMR 5,15).
  PB91 -139717/CDH                See 0098
PB91-139733/CDH
  Use of CERCLA Section  106 Unilateral  En-
  forcement for Remedial Design and Remedial
  Action: Strategy for Fiscal Year 1990.
  PB91-139733/CDH                See 0891
 PB91-139741/CDH
  Roles  and Responsibilities of Deputy Project
  Officers  and  Work  Assignment  Managers
  under  the Technical  Enforcement  Support
  (TES) Contracts.
  PB91-139741/CDH                See 0069
 PB91-139758/CDH
  Roles and Responsibilities of Regional Project
  Officers  and Headquarters Zone  Project Offi-
  cers for Management of  TES (TES  5) Con-
  tracts.
   PB91 -139758/CDH                See 0604
 PB91-139766/CDH
   Expanded Civil Judicial Referral Procedures.
   PB91-139766/CDH               See 0539
 PB91-139774/CDH
   Procedures for Transmittal of CERCLA  and
   RCRA Civil Judicial  Enforcement Case Pack-
   ages to Headquarters.
   PB91-139774/CDH               See 0591
 PB91-139790/CDH
   Expansion of Direct Referral  of Cases to the
   Department of Justice.
   PB91-139790/CDH               See 0540
 PB91-139808/CDH
   Multi-Media  Settlements  of   Enforcement
   Claims.
   PB91-139808/CDH                See 0581
                                                                                                                           NU-41

-------
               PB91-139980/CDH
                                                                     NUMBER INDEX
 PB91.139980/CDH
   Guidance tor Environmental Priorities initiative
   (EP|J FacilfSes in the Superfund Pro-Remedial
   Program.
•   P891-139880/CDH               see 0341
 PB9J-I4Q1J1/PPH ;',"",;' ' ~~  " ........... ...... ^'.,  '"„""
   Istuance o( Administrative Orders Under Sec-
   ftffl 3Q13 of tha 'Resource Conservation and
   Recovery Act.
   PB91-14011VCDH               See 0568
 PB91-140129/CDH
   Issuance of Final Revised Guidance  on the
   Usa and  Issuance of Administrative  Orders
   Umtor Section 7003 of the Resource Conser-
   vation and Recovery Act (RCRA).
   P881-140129/CDH               See 0569
 P80J-140202/CDH .............................................
   Tiwmlttaiof the .FlnaJ Waste Oil Interim En-
   (ofcomont Guidance Document.
   PB9,t-140202/CDH               See 0889
 PB91-144675/COH
   Evaluation of Exposure Markers.
   P89f-144875/CbH
PB91-145110/CDH
   SITE Demonstration of the CF Systems Organ-
   fes Extraction System.
   PS91-145110/CDH               See 1301
PB91-145433/CDH
   Physical/Chemical Treatment  of Hazardous
  Waste Sites: Speaker Slide Copies  and Sup-
   porting Information.
   P89M45433/COH                See 1287
                                               See 1246
                                                     ,
                Guidance on Remedial Actions for Superfund
                Sites with PCS Contamination.
                P691-145466/CDH               See
                    ii!"1    •• '   fi        " '»'  "  »"°
  f   :     	Abstwcl Proceedings: Forum  on  Innovative
                Hazardous  Waste Treatment  Technologies;
                pomjrte  and  International (2nd). Held  in
                PhfteWphia,  Pennsylvania  on  May  15-17,
                ism        	
                P89H4S649/CRH               See 1186
           i   PB91-182479/CDH	
                RfflMJlts from the Stabilization  Technologies
  	     Evaluated by the Site Program. New England
                Environmental Expo 90.
                P891.162479/CDH               See 1558
              PB91-162727/CPH	,	
                Future of Expert Systems in the Environmental
                Protection Agency.
                PB9M63727/CDH               See 1257
              PB91-182784/CDH
                Factors Affecting the Applicability of  Plasma
	Hi !' *!•    f     Systems to tha Cleanup of Superfund Sites,
  , ; .;;   ,.,.     PB§J-J627e4/COH	See 1250
              PB91-163741/CDH
                Field   Demonstration  of  the  UV/OxIdation
                Technology to Treat Ground Water Contami-
                nated wfthVOCs.
                P891-163741/CDH                See 1452
              PB91-J63758/CDH
                Control Technology:  Estimating  Innovative
                Technology Costs for the SITE Program.
                PB9M63758/CDH                See 1222
              PB9M67593/CDH
                Reporting Requirements  for Continuous  Re-
               te»»s  o( Hazardous Substances:  A Guide for
               FaoSWes and Vessels on Compliance.
               PB91-T67593/COH                See 1150

             NU-42
 PB91-168450/CDH
   Continuous Release-Emergency Response No-
   tification  System  and  Priority  Assessment
   Model: User's Manual for EPA Regions.
   PB91-16845p/CpH               3861144
 PB91-168468/CDH
   Continuous Release-Emergency Response No-
   tification  System  and  Priority  Assessment
   Model: Model Documentation.
   PB91-168468/CDH               See 1143
 PB91-170407/CDH
   Site  Enforcement  Tracking System  (SETS):
   PRP National Listing by Site.
   PB91 -170407/CDH               See 0834
 PB91-170415/CDH
   Site  Enforcement  Tracking System  (SETS):
   PRP National Listing Alphabetically by Party
   Name.
   PB91 -170415/CDH               See 0828
 PB91-170423/CDH
   Site  Enforcement  Tracking System  (SETS):
   Frequency by Party Name Report.
   PB91-170423/CDH               See 0609
 PB91-170449/CDH
   Site Enforcement  Tracking System  (SETS):
   PRP Listing by Site for Connecticut.
   PB91 -170449/CDH               See 0641
 PB91-170456/CDH
   Site Enforcement  Tracking System  (SETS):
   PRP Listing by Site for Maine.
   PB91-170456/CDH               See 0674
 PB91-170464/CDH
   Site Enforcement Tracking System  (SETS):
  i PRP Listing by Site for Massachusetts.
   PB91-170464/CDH               See 0680
 PB91-170472/CDH
   Site Enforcement Tracking System  (SETS):
 i;  PRP Listing by Site for New  Hampshire.
   PB91-170472/CDH               See 0704
 PB91-170480/CDH
   Site Enforcement Tracking System  (SETS):
   PRP Listing by Site for Rhode Island.
   PB91-170480/CDH                See 0789
 PB91-170498/CDH
   Site Enforcement Tracking  System  (SETS):
   PRP Listing by Site for Vermont.
   PB91-170498/CDH                See 0810
 PB91-170514/CDH
   Site Enforcement Tracking  System  (SETS):
   PRP Listing by Site for New Jersey.
   PB91 -170514/CDH                See 0707
 PB91-170522/CDH
  Site Enforcement Tracking  System (SETS):
  PRP Listing by Site for New York.
  PB91-170522/CDH                See 0713
 PB91-170530/CDH
  Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
  PRP Listing by Site for Puerto Rico.
  PB91-170530/CDH                See 0737
 PB91-170555/CDH
  Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
  PRP Listing by Site for Delaware.
 ,,, PB91-170555/CDH                See 0644
 PB91-170563/CDH
  Site  Enforcement  Tracking System (SETS):
  PRP Listing by Site for Maryland.
  PB91-170563/CDH               See 0677
PB91-170571/CDH
  Site  Enforcement  Tracking  System (SETS):
  PRP Listing by Site for Pennsylvania.
  PB91 -170571 /CDH               See 0734
  PB91-170589/CDH
    Site  Enforcement Tracking  System  (SETS):
    PRP Listing by Site for Virginia.
    PB91-170589/CDH               See 0812
  PB91-170597/CDH
    Site  Enforcement Tracking  System  (SETS):
    PRP Listing by Site for West Virginia.
    PB91-170597/CDH               See 0818
  PB91-170613/CDH
    Site  Enforcement Tracking  System  (SETS):
    PRP Listing by Site for Alabama.
    PB91 -170613/CDH               See 0623
  PB91-170621/CDH
    Site  Enforcement Tracking  System  (SETS):
    PRP Listing by Site for Florida.
    PB91 -170621 /CDH               See 0647
  PB91-170639/CDH
    Site Enforcement Tracking  System  (SETS):
    PRP Listing by Site for Georgia.
    PB91-170639/CDH               See 0650
  PB91-170647/CDH
    Site Enforcement Tracking  System  (SETS):
    PRP Listing by Site for Kentucky.
    PB91-170647/CDH               See 0668
  PB91-170654/CDH
    Site Enforcement Tracking  System (SETS):
    PRP Listing by Site for Mississippi.
    PB91-170654/CDH               See 0689
  PB91-170662/CDH
    Site Enforcement Tracking  System (SETS):
    PRP Listing by Site for North Carolina.
    PB91-170662/CDH                See 0716
  PB91-170670/CDH
    Site Enforcement Tracking  System (SETS):
    PRP Listing by Site for South Carolina.
    PB91 -170670/CDH                See 0792
  PB91-170688/CDH
    Site Enforcement Tracking  System (SETS):
    PRP Listing by Site for Tennessee.
    PB91-170688/CDH               See 0798
  PB91-170704/CDH
   Site  Enforcement  Tracking  System  (SETS):
   PRP Listing by Site for Illinois.
   PB91-170704/CDH               See 0656
 PB91-170712/CDH
   Site  Enforcement  Tracking System  (SETS):
   PRP Listing by Site for Indiana.
   PB91 -170712/CDH               See 0659
 PB91-170720/CDH
   Site Enforcement  Tracking System  (SETS):
   PRP Listing by Site for Michigan.
   PB91-170720/CDH               See 0683
 PB91-170738/CDH
   Site Enforcement  Tracking System  (SETS):
   PRP Listing by Site for Minnesota.
   PB91-170738/CDH               See 0686
 PB91-170746/CDH
   Site Enforcement  Tracking System  (SETS):
   PRP Listing by Site for Ohio.
   PB91-170746/CDH               See 0725
	PB91-170753/CDH	'
   Site Enforcement  Tracking System  (SETS):
   PRP Listing by Site for Wisconsin.
   PB91-170753/CDH               See 0821
 PB91-170779/CDH
   Site Enforcement  Tracking System  (SETS):
   PRP Listing by Site for Arkansas.
   PB91-170779/CDH               See 0632
                                 Kin,

-------
                                                       NUMBER INDEX
                                                                                                                PB91-193409/CDH
PB91-170787/CDH
  Site  Enforcement  Tracking System  (SETS):
  PRP Listing by Site for Louisiana.
  PB91-170787/CDH               See 0671
PB91-170795/CDH
  Site  Enforcement  Tracking System  (SETS):
  PRP  Listing by Site for New Mexico.
  PB91-170795/CDH               See 0710
PB91-170803/CDH
  Site  Enforcement  Tracking System  (SETS):
  PRP  Listing by Site for Oklahoma.
  PB91-170803/CDH               See 0728
PB91-170811/CDH
  Site  Enforcement  Tracking System  (SETS):
  PRP  Listing by Site for Texas.
  PB91 -170811 /CDH               See 0801
PB91-170837/CDH
  Site  Enforcement  Tracking System (SETS):
  PRP Listing by Site for Iowa.
  PB91 -170837/CDH               See 0662
PB91-170845/CDH
  Site  Enforcement Tracking  System (SETS):
  PRP Listing by Site for Kansas.
  PB91-170845/CDH               See 0665
PB91-170852/CDH
  Site  Enforcement Tracking  System (SETS):
  PRP Listing by Site for Missouri.
  PB91-170852/CDH               See 0692
 PB91-170860/CDH
  Site  Enforcement Tracking  System  (SETS):
  PRP Listing by Site for Nebraska.
   PB91-170860/CDH               See 0698
 PB91-170886/CDH
   Site Enforcement Tracking  System  (SETS):
  ' PRP Listing by Site for Colorado.
   PB91-170886/CDH               See 0638
 PB91-170894/CDH
   Site Enforcement Tracking  System  (SETS):
   PRP Listing by Site for Montana.
   PB91-170894/CDH               See 0695
 PB91-170902/CDH
   Site Enforcement Tracking  System  (SETS):
   PRP Listing by Site for North Dakota.
   PB91-170902/CDH               See 0719
 PB91-170910/CDH
   Site  Enforcement Tracking  System   (SETS):
   PRP Listing by Site for South Dakota.
   PB91-170910/CDH               See 0795
 PB91-170928/CDH
   Site Enforcement Tracking  System  (SETS):
   PRP Listing by Site for Utah.
   PB91-170928/CDH              . See 0807
 PB91-170936/CDH
   Site Enforcement Tracking  System  (SETS):
   PRP Listing by Site for Wyoming.
   PB91 -170936/CDH                See 0824
  PB91-170951/CDH
   Site Enforcement Tracking  System  (SETS):
   PRP Listing by Site for American Samoa.
   PB91 -170951 /CDH                See 0626
  PB91-170969/CDH
   Site Enforcement Tracking  System  (SETS):
   PRP Listing by Site for Arizona.
   PB91-170969/CDH               See 0629
  PB91-170977/CDH
   Site Enforcement  Tracking   System  (SETS):
    PRP Listing by Site for California.
    PB91-170977/CDH               See 0635
  PB91-170985/CDH
    Site Enforcement  Tracking   System  (SETS):
    PRP Listing by Site for Nevada.
    PB91-170985/CDH               See 0701
PB91-170993/CDH
  Site  Enforcement  Tracking System  (SETS):
  PRP Listing by Site for Northern Marianas.
  PB91-170993/CDH               See 0722
PB91-171009/CDH
  Site  Enforcement  Tracking System  (SETS):
  PRP Listing by Site for Trust Territories.
.  PB91-171009/CDH               See 0804
PB91-171025/CDH
  Site  Enforcement  Tracking System  (SETS):
  PRP Listing by Site for Idaho.
  PB91 -171025/CDH               See 0653
PB91-171033/CDH
  Site  Enforcement  Tracking System  (SETS):
  PRP  Listing by Site for Oregon.
  PB91 -171033/CDH              See 0731
PB91-171041/CDH
  Site  Enforcement Tracking System  (SETS):
  PRP Listing by Site for Washington.
  PB91-171041/CDH              See 0815
PB91-171686/CDH
  EPA SITE Demonstration  of the International
  Waste Technologies/Geo:Con In situ  Stabiliza-
  tion/Solidification Process.
  PB91-171686/CDH           ,    See 1553
PB91-171694/CDH
  Use  of Electrokinetics for Hazardous Waste
  Site  Remediation.
  PB91-171694/CDH               See 1366
 PB91-176891/CDH
  Demonstration Projects Under the U.S.  EPA
  Superfund Innovative  Technology Evaluation
  Program.
  PB91-176891/CDH               See 1230
 PB91-176909/CDH
   Demonstration of Hazardous Waste Site Treat-
   ment Technologies.
   PB91-176909/CDH                See 1227
 PB91-177386/CDH
   Evaluating the Effectiveness of Ground Water
   Extraction Systems.
   PB91-177386/CDH                See 1443
 PB91-179085/CDH
   Alternative Biological Treatment Processes for
   Remediation of Creosote-and  PCP-Contaminat-
   ed Materials: Bench-Scale Treatability Studies.
   PB91-179085/CDH                See  1418
 PB91-181768/CDH
   Toxic Treatments 'In-situ' Steam/Hot-Air Strip-
   ping Technology.  Applications Analysis Report.
   PB91-181768/CDH                See 1545
 PB91-182097/CDH
   EPA Site Demonstration  of the Terra Vac In
   situ Vacuum Extraction Process in Groveland,
   Massachusetts.  (Site  Program  Update:  Part
   VII).
   PB91-182097/CDH                See 1243
 PB91-I82279/CDH
   EPA Site Demonstration of  BioTrol Aqueous
   Treatment System.
   PB91-182279/CDH                See 1441
  PB91-182329/CDH
   Development and Use of Site-Specific Chemi-
   cal and Biological Criteria for Assessing  New
   Bedford Harbor Pilot Dredging Project.
   PB91-182329/CDH               See 1583
  PB91-182493/CDH
   Operations  and  Research at the U.S. EPA In-
   cineration Research Facility:  Annual Report for
    FY90.
    PB91-182493/CDH               See 1483
PB91-182725/CDH
  Control of Transient Incinerator Emissions with
  an Oxygen Based Combustion System.
  PB91-182725/CDH               See 1401
PB91-182840/CDH
  Sector Sampling for VOC's'during Remediation
  of Superfund Site at  Shaver's Farm, Georgia.
  PB91-182840/CDH               See 1417
PB91-183541/CDH
  Incineration Treatment of Arsenic-Contaminat-
  ed Soil.
  PB91 -183541 /CDH               See 1268
PB91-186965/CDH
  Biological Assessment of Toxicity Caused  by
  Chemical Constituents Eluted from Site Soils
  Collected at the Drake Chemical Superfund
  Site, Lock Haven, Clinton Co., Pennsylvania.
  PB91-186965/CDH               See 1491
PB91-186999/CDH
  Enforcement Project Management Handbook.
  PB91-186999/CDH               See 0532
 PB91-187005/CDH
   Final  Guidance on Preparing Waste-In Lists
   and Volumetric Rankings for Release to Poten-
   tially   Responsible  Parties  (PRPs)  under
   CERCLA ('Waste-In' Guidance).
   PB91-187005/CDH               See 0542
 PB91-187013/CDH
   Model Informational Notice Letter to  Local
   Governments.
   PB91 -187013/CDH               See 0575
 PB91-187021/CDH
   CERCLA Implementation of Inspector Training
   Requirements for OSCs/RPMs at the  Interme-
   diate Level in STEP and First-Line Supervisors.
   PB91-187021/CDH               See 0517
 PB91-187039/CDH
   Questions and Answers About the State Role
   in  Remedy Selection  at Non-Fund-Financed
   Enforcement Sites.
   PB91-187039/CDH               See 0482
 PB91-187054/CDH
   Chemfix Technologies, Inc. Solidification/Stabi-
   lization Process. Application Analysis Report.
   PB91-187054/CDH               See 1551
 PB91-190850/CDH
   CERCLA Removal  Actions at  Methane  Re-
   lease Sites.
   PB91-190850/CDH                See 0416
 PB91-190975/CDH
   Air/Superfund  National  Technical  Guidance
   Study Series.  Emission Factors for Superfund
   Remediation Technologies.
   PB91-190975/CDH                See 1381
 PB91-191007/CDH
   Basic Concepts  of Contaminant Sorption at
   Hazardous Waste Sites (Ground Water Issue).
   PB91-191007/CDH                See 1431
 PB91-191056/CDH
   Reductive Dehalogenation of Organic Contami-
   nants  in Soils and  Ground  Water. Ground
   Water Issue.
   PB91-191056/CDH                See 1527
  PB91-191106/CDH
   Evaluating Amphibian Responses in  Wetlands
   Impacted by  Mining Activities in the Western
   United States.
   PB91 -191106/CDH                See 1586
  PB91-193409/CDH
    Superfund  Desk  Reference for Municipalities.
    PB91-193409/CDH                See 0486
                                                                                                                            NU-43

-------
                 PB91-193417/CDH
                                                                       NUMBER INDEX
I;I":  I:
   PB91-193417/CDH
    SffBSmittal  of  Model  Consent  Decree for
    OERCLA Section 104(e) Information Request
    Enforcement Actions.
    ESHd WT/COfJ	h	,  See 0888
  PB9M98246/CDH
    SfTE Demonstration of the American Combus-
    tion Pyrolron Oxygen-Enhanced Burner.
    P,891r196246/C0H         ,.  ,,,,,,§661299
  PB91-199844/CDH
    Us« of a Fourier Transform Spectrometer as a
    Remote Sensor at Superfund Sites.
    P891-199844/CDH               See 1365
  PB91-201673/CDH
    United   States   Environmental   Protection
    Agency  Modol  CERCLA  RD/RA  Consent
    Decree.
    PB91-201673/CDH               See 0890
  PB91-201764/CDH
    Evaluation of, and Additional Guidance on. Is-
    suance of  Unilateral  Administrative Orders
    (UAOs) for RD/RA.
    P881-201764/CDH               See 0538
  PB91-204321/CDH
    QiSSrf*Jtef.Choosing Indicator Species for Eco-
    logical Ri»k  Assessments at Superfund  Sites
    (90-6402).
    PB91-204321/CDH                See 1224
  PB91-204628/CDH
   Wffifen""Demand for CERClA Cost Recovery
   PB9^2Q4§28/CPH                See  0894
  PB91-206476/CDH
   Pojcy Towards Owners of Residential Property
   at Suporfund Sttes.
   PB91-205476/CDH               See 0586
 PB9J;20J492/C,PH
   toiJSmwntaiion of the Decentralized Contrac-
   tc? Performance  Evaluation  and Award  Fee
   Procoss for Selected Remedial Program Con-
   tracts.
   PB91-205492/CDH               See 0031
 PB91-205526/CDH
  , Suppiomontal Guidance  on  Performing  Risk
   Ass»ssnwnts In Remedial InvestigaBon/Feasi-
   b% Studies (RI/FSs). Conducted by Potential-
   ly Responsible Parties (PRPs).
   P891-205526/CDH               See 1078
 PB91-211888/CDH
   Aif/Superfund  National Technical  Guidance
   Study Series:  Estimation of Air Impacts for Air
  Stripping of Contaminated Water.
  PB91-211888/CDH               See 1382
 PB91-211912/CDH
  Rote of Health Research  in Support of EPA's
  Regulatory Programs.
  PSJ|;2J191?/CDH 	      See 1074
 PB91-211938/CDH
  Measurement  o< Hydraulic Conductivity Distri-
  butions: A Manual of Practice.
  PB91-211938/CDH              See 1467
 PB91-213819/CDH
  Exxon Vaktoz  CHI Spill. A Report to the Presi-
  dent
  P89I-213819/CDH               See 0928
 PB91:213827/<;PH  .'.'I.   '.,,        	,	' ,-„
  FtoW Standard Operating  Procedures for  Es-
  tabtohJng Work Zones (F.S.O.P. 6).
  PB9I-213827/CDH               See 0911
PB91-213835/CpH
  F^Hstindard Qperatiog Procedures for Prep-
  a*a|gn of a SftQ Safety Plan  F.S.O.P. No. 9.
  PB9i-213835/CDH               See 0912
   PB91-213843/CDH
    Reid  Standard Operating Procedures for Air
    Surveillance F.S.O.P. No. 8.
    PB91-213843/CDH               See 0910
   PB91-213850/CDH
    Field Standard Operating Procedures for the
    Decontamination  of  Response  Personnel
    F.S.O.P. No. 7.
    PB91-21385Q/CDH               See 0913
   PB9J-213868/CDH
    Oil Spill Prevention, Control, and Countermeas-
    ures Program. Task Force Report.
    PB91-213868/CDH               See 0932
  PB91-214080/CDH
    Guidance for Coordinating ATSDR Health As-
    sessment Activities with the Superfund Reme-
    dial Process.
    PB91-214080/CDH               See 1029
  PB91-214098/CDH
    CERCLA Compliance with Other Environmen-
    tal Statutes.
    PB91-214098/CDH               See 0404
  PB91-214106/CDH
    Superfund Remedial Program Financial  Man-
    agement Authority, Responsibilities and Proce-
    dures.
    PB91-214106/CDH               See 1137
  PB91-214122/CDH
    Superfund LDR  Guide  No. 7.  Determining
    When Land Disposal Restrictions (LDRs) Are
    Relevant and  Appropriate to  CERCLA  Re-
    sponse Actions.
    PB91-214122/CDH                See  0446
  PB91-214171/CDH
   Assurance of  Hazardous Waste  Capacity,
   Guidance to State Officials. Assistance in Ful-
   filling the Requirements of CERCLA  104(c)(9).
   PB91-214171/CDH               See 0129
 PB91-214197/CDH
   Risk Assessment in Superfund: A Primer.  First
   Edition, September 1990.
   PB91-214197/CDH               See 1073
 PB91-214205/CDH
   Consideration of RCRA Requirements in  Per-
   forming CERCLA Responses at  Mining Waste
   Sites.
   PB91-214205/CDH               See 0420
 PB91-214221/CDH
   Role of  Expedited Response Actions under
   SARA.
   PB91-214221/CDH               See 1116
 PB91-214296/CDH
   User's  Guide to the Contract Laboratory  Pro-
   gram.
   PB91-214296/CDH              See 0079
 PB91-214957/CDH
   OERR   Organizational  Conflict   of  Interest
   Review  and  Approval  Program  (Superfund
   Management Review: Recommendation  No.
   46C).
   PB91-214957/CDH               See 0046
 PB91-214965/CDH
  ARCS Work Assignment  Management: Field
  Guide.
  PB91-214965/CDH               See 0021
 PB91-214973/CDH
  Land Disposal Restrictions as Relevant and
  Appropriate Requirements for CERCLA Con-
  taminated Soil and Debris.
  PB91-214973/CD1-I               See 0428
PB91-214981/CDH
  RI/FS Streamlining.
  PB91-214981/CDH               See 1110
  PB91-215020/CDH
    Guidance for Organizing ARCS Contract Files.
    PB91-215020/CDH               See 0025
  PB91-215053/CDH
    Site-Specific Contracting for Removals.
    PB91-215053/CDH               See 1011
  PB91-216218/CDH
    Aseptic Sampling  of  Unconsolidated Heaving
    Soils in Saturated Zones.
    PB91-216218/CDH               See 1489
  PB91-218941/CDH
    Importance of Quality for Collection of Environ-
    mental Samples. Planning, Implementing,  and
    Assessing Field Sampling Quality at CERCLA
    Sites.
    PB91-218941/CDH               See 0919
  PB91-219097/CDH
    New Methods  for  Modeling the Transport of
    Metals from Mineral Processing Wastes  into
    Surface Waters.
    PB91-219097/CDH               See 1590
  PB91-222059/CDH
    Air/Superfund  National  Technical  Guidance
    Study  Series.  Database  of  Emission Rate
    Measurement Projects.
    PB91-222059/CDH                See 1379
  PB91-226308/CDH
    Pilot-Scale Incinerability Evaluation of Arsenic-
    and Lead-Contaminated Soils from Two Super-
    fund Sites.
    PB91-226308/CDH                See 1288
  PB91-227959/CDH
   Summary of 'Methodologies for Implementa-
   tion of CERCLA Section 122(g)(1)(a) De Mini-
   mis Waste Contributor Settlements'.
   PB91-227959/CDH               See 0878
 PB91-227983/CDH
   Biological Treatment of Wood  Preserving Site
   Groundwater by BioTrol,  Inc.  Applications
   Analysis Report.
   PB91-227983/CDH                See 1433
 PB91-228015/CDH
   Solvent Extraction Treatment.
   PB91-228015/CDH                See 1306
 PB91-228023/CDH
   Mobile/Transportable Incineration Treatment.
  PB91-228023/CDH                See 1481
 PB91-228031/CDH
  Chemical  Dehalogenation  Treatment: APEG
  Treatment.
  PB91-228031/CDH                See  1210
 PB91-228049/CDH
  Slurry Biodegradation.
  PB91-228049/CDH                See  1428
 PB91-228056/CDH
  Soil Washing Treatment.
  PB91-228056/CDH               See  1532
 PB91-228064/CDH
  In situ Steam Extraction Treatment.
  PB91-228064/CDH               See 1512
 PB91-228072/CDH
  In situ Soil Vapor Extraction Treatment.
  PB91-228072/CDH               See 1511
PB91-228080/CDH
  Thermal Desorption Treatment.
  PB91-228080/CDH               See 1357
PB91-228197/CDH
  Summary of 'Notification of Out-of-State Ship-
  ments of Superfund Site Wastes'.
  PB91-228197/CDH               See 0438

-------
                                                       NUMBER INDEX
                                                                    PB91-921230/CDH
PB91-228262/CDH
  Summary of 'Interim Policy on CERCLA Settle-
  ments Involving  Municipalities and  Municipal
  Wastes'.
  PB91-228262/CDH                See 0877
PB91-228270/CDH
  Summary of 'Interim Guidance: Streamlining
  the CERCLA Settlement Decision Process'.
  PB91-228270/CDH                See 0875
PB91-228288/CDH
  Summary of 'Guidance  of Landowner Liability
  under Section 107(a)1 of CERCLA, De Minimis
  Settlements under Section  122(g)(1)(b)  of
  CERCLA, and  Settlements  with Prospective
  Purchasers of Contaminated Property'.
  PB91-228288/CDH                See 0872
PB91-228296/CDH
  Summary of 'Releasing Information  to Poten-
  tially Responsible  Parties at CERCLA  Sites'.
  PB91-228296/CDH                See 0880
PB91-228304/CDH
  Summary of 'Interim  Guidelines  for  Preparing
  NBARs'.
  PB91-228304/CDH                See 0876
PB91-228312/CDH
  Summary of 'Guidance  on  CERCLA Section
  106(a) UAOs for RD/RA'.
  PB91 -228312/CDH                See 0873
PB91-228320/CDH
  Summary of 'PRP Search Supplemental Guid-
  ance for Sites in the Superfund Remedial Pro-
  gram'.
  PB91-228320/CDH                See 0879
PB91-228338/CDH
  Summary of 'Guidance  on Documenting Deci-
  sions Not to Take Cost Recovery Actions'.
  PB91-228338/CDH               See 0874
PB91-228346/CDH
  Handbook: Responding to Discharges of Sink-
  ing Hazardous Substances.
  PB91-228346/CDH               See 1589
PB91-228361/CDH
  Guidance on Oversight of Potentially Respon-
  sible Party Remedial  Investigations and Feasi-
  bility Studies. Volume 1.
  PB91-228361/CDH               See 1094
PB91-228379/CDH
  Guidance on Oversight of Potentially Respon-
  sible Party Remedial  Investigations and Feasi-
  bility Studies. Volume 2. Appendices.
  PB91-228379/CDH               See 1095
PB91-228395/CDH
  Inventory   of  Treatability   Study  Vendors.
  Volume 1.
  PB91-228395/CDH               See 1171
PB91-228734/CDH
  Consultation on Records of  Decision (RODS)
  for Containment-Only Remedies.
  PB91-228734/CDH               See 0521
PB91-228742/CDH
  Written  Demand  for Recovery of  Costs  In-
  curred Under the Comprehensive Environmen-
  tal Response, Compensation, and Liability Act
  (CERCLA).
  PB91-228742/CDH               See 0895
PB91-231191/CDH
  Cost Estimating Systems for Remedial Action
  Projects.
  PB91-231191/CDH               See 1123
PB91-233296/CDH
  Evaluation and Testing of a Protocol to Deter-
  mine the Aerobic Degradation Potential of Haz-
  ardous Waste Constituents in Soil.
  PB91-233296/CDH               See  1503
PB91-233627/CDH
  Remedial Action, Treatment,  and Disposal of
  Hazardous Waste. Proceedings of the Annual
  Hazardous  Waste   Research   Symposium
  (17th). Held in Cincinnati, Ohio on April  9-11,
  1991.
  PB91-233627/CDH               See  1135
PB91-233650/CDH
  Environmental Compliance Branch, Standard
  Operating Procedures and Quality Assurance
  Manual, Revision 1.
  PB91-233650/CDH               See  0535
PB91-238584/CDH
  Considerations in Ground Water Remediation
  at Superfund Sites.
  PB91-238584/CDH               See  1436
PB91-238592/CDH
  Superfund Technical Assistance Grant (TAG)
  Handbook.
  PB91-238592/CDH               See  0499
PB91-238725/CDH
  National Priorities List Book Set.
  PB91-238725/CDH               See  0147
PB91-238733/CDH
  Citizens' Guidance  Manual for the Technical
  Assistance Grant Program.
  PB91-238733/CDH               See 0462
PB91-240523/CDH
  Harmonization of QA Procedures for Environ-
  mental Data Operations: Development of  a Na-
  tional  Consensus Standard for Quality Assur-
  ance for Environmental  Programs.
  PB91-240523/CDH               See 0989
PB91-240572/CDH
  Evaluation of Alternative Treatment  Technol-
  ogies for CERCLA Soils and  Debris (Summary
  of Phase 1 and Phase 2).
  PB91-240572/CDH                See 1504
PB91-2423S2/CDH
  Enhancing State Superfund Capabilities:  Nine-
  State Study.
  PB91-242362/CDH                See047t
PB91-921202/CDH
  SUPERFUND:  Focusing on  the Nation at
  Large. A Decade of Progress at National  Prior-
  ities List Sites.
  PB91-921202/CDH                See 0321
PB91-921204/CDH
  Progress  Toward  Implementing  Superfund.
  Fiscal Year 1989.
  PB91-921204/CDH                See 0300
PB91-921205/CDH
  Conducting Remedial Investigations/Feasibility
  Studies  for CERCLA Municipal  Landfill  Sites.
  PB91-921205/CDH                See 1084
PB91-921206/CDH
  Guidance on Remedial Actions  for Superfund
  Sites with PCB Contamination.
  PB91-921206/CDH                See 1261
PB91-921207/CDH
  Superfund:  Focusing on the Nation at Large. A
  Decade of  Progress at National Priorities List
  Sites.
  PB91-921207/CDH                See 0322
PB91-921208/CDH
  Guidance for Data  Useability in Risk Assess-
  ment. Interim Report.
  PB91-921208/CDH                See 1032
PB91-921209/CDH
  National Priorities List Sites: Alabama.
  PB91-921209/CDH                See 0148
PB91-921210/CDH
  National Priorities List Sites: Alaska.
  PB91-921210/CDH                See 0151
PB91-921211/CDH
  National  Priorities List  Sites: Arizona and
  Nevada.
  PB91 -921211 /CDH                See 0156
PB91-921212/CDH
  National Priorities List Sites: Arkansas.
  PB91-921212/CDH                See 0159
PB91-921213/CDH
  National Priorities List Sites: California.
  PB91 -921213/CDH                See 0162
PB91-921214/CDH
  National Priorities List Sites: Colorado.
  PB91-921214/CDH                See 0165
PB91-921215/CDH
  National Priorities List Sites: Connecticut.
  PB91-921215/CDH                See 0168
PB91-921216/CDH
  National Priorities List Sites: Delaware.
  PB91-921216/CDH                See 0171
PB91-921217/CDH
  National Priorities List Sites: Florida.
  PB91-921217/CDH                See 0174
PB91-921218/CDH
  National Priorities List Sites: Georgia.
  PB91-921218/CDH                See 0177
PB91-921219/CDH
  National Priorities List Sites: Hawaii.
  PB91-921219/CDH                See 0180
PB91-921220/CDH
  National Priorities  List Sites: Idaho.
  PB91-921220/CDH                See 0181
PB91-921221/CDH
  National Priorities  List Sites: Illinois.
  PB91-921221/CDH                See 0184
PB91-921222/CDH
  National Priorities List Sites: Indiana.
  PB91-921222/CDH                See 0187
PB91-921223/CDH
  National Priorities List Sites: Iowa.
  PB91-921223/CDH                See 0190
PB91-921224/CDH
  National Priorities List Sites: Kansas.
  PB91-921224/CDH                See 0193
PB91-921225/CDH
  National Priorities List Sites: Kentucky.
  PB91-921225/CDH                See 0196
PB91-921226/CDH
  National Priorities List Sites: Louisiana.
  PB91-921226/CDH                See 0199
PB91-921227/CDH
  National Priorities List Sites: Maine.
  PB91-921227/CDH                See 0202
PB91-921228/CDH
  National Priorities List Sites: Maryland.
  PB91-921228/CDH                See 0205
PB91-921229/CDH
  National Priorities List Sites: Massachusetts.
  PB91-921229/CDH                See 0208
PB91-921230/CDH
  National Priorities List Sites: Michigan.
  PB91-921230/CDH                See 0211
                                                                                                                            NU-45

-------
                PB91-921231/CDH
           NUMBER  INDEX
                PB91-921231/CDH
                 National Priorities Ust Sites: Minnesota.
                 PB91-921231/COH               See 0214
                PB91-921232/CDH
                 National Priorities Ust Sites: Mississippi.
                . P891-921232/CDH               See 0217
                PB9 j^9||233/Cp'H ,'"'   '"~   ''„'"," _',,"',"' '\ "~r""
                 Natbnal'priprifes 'Ust Site's; Missouri.'"
El
  National Prlorltlos Ust Sites: Montana.
  PB91-921234/CDH                See 0223
PB9I-921235/CDH
  Nattona) Prioritlos Ust Sites: New Jersey.
  PB91-821235/CDH                See 0232

      flOSl. Priorities Usl Sftes: Nebraska.
      'I^IMe^CDf-j,,	^	         See 0226,
'PBl|-92t 237/CDH	'""1  "'I   ,   ,  I,""""',. „"""..
  rlatlonal Prioriti'os Ust Sites:' New Hampshire.
  FS91-921237/COH                See 0229
PB91-921238/CDH
  National Priorities Ust Sites: New Mexico.
  Pi91-821238/CDH                See 0235
PB91-921239/CDH
  National PrioriUes Ust Sites: New York.
  Pi81-S2123,9/CDH	;     .    See 0238
PB§i.921240/CDH
  Natkxwl Prioritlos Ust Sites: North Carolina.
  PB91-921240/CDH                See 0243
PB91-921241/COH
  National Priorities Ust Sites: North  and  South
  Dakota.
  PB91-921241/CDH                See 0241
PB91-921242/CDH
  National Priorities Ust Sites: Ohio.
  P,i9J-?21242/CDH                See 0247
PB91-921243/COH
  National  Priorities Ust Sites: Oklahoma.
  PB91-921243/CDH                See 0250
PB91-921244/CDH
  NaMonal  Priorities Ust Sites; Oregon.
  P8ll-921244/CbH                See 0253
PB91-921245/CDH
  National Priorities Ust Sites: Pennsylvania.
  PB91-921245/CDH                See 0256
PB91-921246/CDH
  Naikmal Priorities Ust Sites: Rhode Island.
  PB91-821246/COH                See 0262
PB91-921247/CDH
  Nattenal  Priorities Ust Sites: South Carolina.
  PS91-S21247/CDH               See 0266
PB91-921248/CDH
  National Priorities Ust Sites: Tennessee.
  P891-921248/CDH               See 0269
PB91-921249/CDH
  National Prforitlos Ust Sites: Texas.
  PB91-921249/CDH               See 0272
PB9^-921250/CDH
  Nakkmal Priorities Ust Sites: Utah.
  P891-921250/COH               See 0276
PB91-921251/CDH
  N|atlonal Priorities dst Sites:' Vermont.	
  PB91-9212S1/CDH               See 0279
PB91-921252/CPH
  Naikmal Priorities Usl Sites; .Virginia.
  PB91-921252/CDH               See 0282
PB91-921253/CDH
  National Prioritlos Uat Sites: Washington.
  PS91-921253/CDH               See 0285
 PB91-921254/CDH
   National Priorities List Sites: West Virginia.
   PB91-921254/CDH               See 0288
 PB91-921255/CDH
   National Priorities List Sites: Wisconsin.
   PB91-921255/CDH               See 0291
vlpB9i-921256/CDH  '  ','	',.  "  ",  '.,'". " ""
   National Priorities Ust Sites: Wyoming.
   PB91-921256/CpH	   3660294	
 PB91-921257/CDH  	-	
   National Priorities Ust Sites: Puerto Rico.
   PB91-921257/CDH               See 0259
 PB91-921258/CDH
   National Priorities List Sites: American Samoa,
   Guam and Trust Territories.
   PB91-921258/CDH               See 0155
 '	  , : I!',  !' :' "; fj V, ;.;:,:;! 'ill J ".|  " -  •    ' 'u;  ' ill',;	„, i||/,:,i|',l||	llti JJ;;;
 PB91-921259/CDH
   Analysis  of  State Superfund Programs:  50-
   State Study, 1990 Update.
   PB91-921259/CDH               See 0448
 PB91-921260/CDH
   Superfund Emergency  Response Actions: A
   Summary  of Federally  Funded  Removals.
   Fourth Annual Report - Fiscal Year 1989.
   PB91-921260/CDH               See 0314
 PB91-921269/CDH
   CERCLA Site Discharges to POTWS Treatabil-
   ity Manual.
   PB91-921269/CDH               See 1577
 PB91-921270/CDH
   CERCLA Site Discharges to POTWS CERCLA
   Site  Sampling Program: Detailed Data Report.
   PB91-921270/CDH               See 1575
 PB91-921271/CDH
   Compendium of ERT Toxiclty Testing Proce-
   dures.
   PB91-921271/CDH               See 0906
 PB91-921273/CDH
   Compendium of ERT Soil Sampling and Sur-
   face Geophysics Procedures.
   PB91-921273/CDH               See 0904
 PB91-921274/CDH
   Compendium of  ERT Surface Water and Sedi-
   ment Sampling Procedures.
   PB91-921274/CDH               See 0905
 PB91-921275/CDH
   Compendium of ERT Groundwater Sampling
   Procedures.
   PB91-921275/CDH               See 0903
 PB91-921276/CDH
   Compendium of  ERT Waste  Sampling Proce-
   dures.
   PB91-921276/CDH                See 0907
 PB91-921277/CDH
   ROD Annual Report, FY 1990.
   PB91-921277/CDH                See 1112
 PB91-921278/CDH
   User's Guide to  the  Contract Laboratory Pro-
   gram.
   PB91-921278/CDH                See 0080
 PB91-921280/CDH
   Compendium of  Federal Facilities  Directives,
   1984 and 1985.
 , i  PB91 -921280/CDH                See 0896
 PB91-921281/CDH
   Compendium of  NPL Listing Policies and Pro-
   cedures, 1982 to 1985.
   PB91 -921281 /CDH               See 0338
 PB91-921282/CDH
   Oil Spill Contingency Planning: National Status.
  A Report to the President.
   PB91-921282/CDH               See 0931
 PB91-921283/CDH
  Survey  of  Materials-Handling  Technologies
  Used at Hazardous Waste Sites.
  PB91:921283/CDH               See1323
 PB91-921285/CDH
  Technical Support Services for Superfund Site
  Remediation. Second Edition.
  PB91-921285/CDH               See 1335
 PB91-921286/CDH
  Superfund Program:  Ten Years of Progress.
  PB91-921286/CDH               See 0977
 PB91-921287/CDH
  Continuous  Release  -  Emergency Response
  Notification  System. User's Manual for Indus-
  try.
	PB91-921287/CDH               See 1145
 PB91-921288/CDH
  Accessing Federal Data Bases for Contaminat-
  ed Site Clean-Up Technologies.
  PB91-921288/CDH               See 1188
 PB91-921289/CDH
  Vendor Information Form to  be  Completed for
  Participation in the: Vendor Information System
  for   Innovative   Treatment   Technologies
  (VISITT).
  PB91-921289/CDH               See 1369
 PB91-921290/CDH
  Innovative  Treatment  Technologies:  Semi-
  Annual  Status  Report,  January  1991. First
  Issue.
  PB91-921290/CDH               See 1274
 PB91-921291/CDH
  Superfund Engineering Issue:  Treatment of
  Lead-Contaminated Soils.
  PB91-921291/CDH               See 1535
 PB91-921292/CDH
  Subsurface Contamination Reference Guide.
  PB91-921292/CDH               See 1474
 PB91-921293/CDH
  Bibliography of  Federal Reports and Publica-
  tions Describing  Alternative and  Innovative
  Treatment Technologies for  Corrective  Action
  and Site Remediation.
  PB91-921293/CDH               See 1206
 PB91-921294/CDH
  Ground-Water Issue:  Characterizing Soils  for
  Hazardous Waste Site Assessments.
  PB91-921294/CDH               See 1455
 PB91-921301/CDH
  Streamlining the RI/FS for CERCLA Municipal
  Landfill Sites.
  PB91-921301/CDH               See 1119
 PB91-921302/CDH
  Closing the NPL Book under  the Original HRS.
  PB91-921302/CDH               See 0337
 PB91-921303/CDH
  Revised Hazard Ranking System: Background
  Information.
  PB91-921303/CDH               See 0378
 PB91-921304/CDH
  Exemptions  from the Statutory  Limits on  Re-
  moval Actions.
  PB91-921304/CDH               See 1002
 PB91-921305/CDH
  Revised Hazard Ranking System: Qs and As.
  PB91-921305/CDH               See 0381
PB91-921306/CDH
  Public Awareness Signs at  Superfund Sites.
  PB91-921306/CDH               See 0481
               NU-46

-------
                                                      NUMBER INDEX
                                                                                                              PB91-921365/CDH
PB91-921307/CDH
  Revised Hazard Ranking System: An Improved
  Tool for Screening Superfund Sites.
  PB91-921307/CDH               See 0377
PB91-921309/CDH
  CERCLA Compliance with the  RCRA Toxicity
  Characteristics (TC) Rule: Part 2.
  PB91-921309/CDH               See 0412
PB91-921310/CDH
  Obtaining a Soil and Debris Treatability Vari-
  ance for Removal  Actions. Superfund LDR
  Guide No. 6B.
  PB91 -921310/CDH               See 0430
PB91-921311/CDH
  ARARs Q's and A's: State Ground-Water Anti-
  degradation Issues.
  PB91 -921311 /CDH               See 0402
PB91-921312/CDH
  Guidance for Data Useability in Risk Assess-
  ment.
  PB91-921312/CDH               See 1030
PB91-921313/CDH
  Compliance with Third  Third  Requirements
  Under the LDRs. Superfund LDR Guide No. 8.
  PB91-921313/CDH               See 0418
PB91-921314/CDH
  Risk Assessment Guidance  for  Superfund.
  Volume  1. Human Health Evaluation Manual.
  Supplemental Guidance:  'Standard Default Ex-
  posure Factors'.
  PB91-921314/CDH               See 1071
PB91-921315/CDH
  Assessing Reports of Continuous Releases of
  Hazardous Substances: A Guide for EPA  Re-
  gions.
  PB91-921315/CDH               See 1142
PB91-921316/CDH
  CERCLIS - WasteLAN - CleanLAN.
  PB91-921316/CDH               See 0015
PB91-921317/CDH
  Guide to Developing Action Memorandums.
  PB91-921317/CDH               See 1097
PB91-921318/CDH
  Superfund Guide to RCRA Management  Re-
  quirements for Mineral Processing Wastes.
  PB91-921318/CDH               See 0439
PB91-921319/CDH
  U.S. Bureau of Reclamation Assistance to the
  Superfund Program.
  PB91-921319/CDH               See 1138
 PB91-921320/CDH
  Using State and Local  Officials to Assist in
  Community Relations (Superfund Management
  Review: Recommendation No.  43.K.L).
  PB91-921320/CDH              See 0128
 PB91-921321/CDH
  ARARs Q's  and  A's:  The  Fund-Balancing
  Waiver.
   PB91 -921321 /CDH               See 0403
 PB91-921322/CDH
   Making Superfund Documents Available to the
   Public throughout the  Cleanup Process,  and
   Discussing Site  Findings and Decisions as
   They are  Developed (Superfund Management
   Review: No. 43 G, H, Q, R, T).
   PB91-921322/CDH               See 0100
 PB91-921324/CDH
   Final Policy on Setting RI/FS Priorities.
   PB91-921324/CDH               See 1090
 PB91-921325/CDH
   Suggested ROD  Language for Various Ground
   Water Remediation Options.
   PB91-921325/CDH               See 1475
PB91-921326/CDH
  Policy on Management of Post-Removal Site
  Control.
  PB91-921326/CDH               See 1008
PB91-921327/CDH
  Superfund LDR Guide No. 6A (2nd  Edition)
  Obtaining a  Soil and Debris Treatability Vari-
  ance for Remedial Actions.
  PB91-921327/CDH               See 0445
PB91-921329/CDH
  Policy on Floodplains and Wetland  Assess-
  ments for CERCLA Actions.
  PB91-921329/CDH               See 0437
PB91-921330/CDH
  Sampler's Guide  to the Contract Laboratory
  Program.
  PB91-921330/CDH               See 0071
PB91-921331/CDH
  Management of Investigation-Derived Wastes
  during Site Inspections.
  PB91-921331/CDH               See 0349
PB91-921332/CDH
  Applicability of Land Disposal Restrictions to
  RCRA and CERCLA Ground Water Treatment
  Reinjection  Superfund Management  Review:
  Recommendation No. 26.
  PB91-921332/CDH               See 1430
PB91-921333/CDH
  Total Quality Management (TQM) and Quality
  Assurance (QA) in Superfund.
  PB91-921333/CDH               See 0996
PB91-921335/CDH
  Headquarters  Support Contract Management
  Procedures.
  PB91-921335/CDH               See 0029
PB91-921336/CDH
  Furthering the Use  of Innovative Treatment
  Technologies in OSWER Programs.
  PB91-921336/CDH               See 1255
PB91-921339/CDH
  Hazardous Waste Operations  and Emergency
  Response:  Uncontrolled   Hazardous Waste
  Sites and RCRA Corrective Actions.
  PB91-921339/CDH                See 0425
 PB91-921340/CDH
  Hazardous Waste Operations  and Emergency
  Response:  RCRA TSD  and  Emergency Re-
  sponse Without Regard to Location.
  PB91-921340/CDH                See 0914
 PB91-921341/CDH
  ARARs Q's and A's: General Policy, RCRA,
  CWA, SDWA, Post-ROD Information, and Con-
  tingent Waivers.
  PB91 -921341 /CDH                See 0401
 PB91-921342/CDH
   Establishing Work Zones  at Uncontrolled Haz-
   ardous Waste Sites.
   PB91 -921342/CDH                See 0908
 PB91-921344/CDH
   Innovative Methods to Increase Public Involve-
   ment in Superfund  Community Relations (Su-
   perfund Management Review Recommenda-
   tion No. 43.A).
   PB91-921344/CDH               See 0097
 PB91-921345/CDH
   Minimizing Problems Caused by Staff Turnover
   (Superfund Management  Review: Recommen-
   dation No. 43, M, N, O).
   PB91-921345/CDH               See 0105
 PB91-921346/CDH
   Priority for Health  and Safety Requirements,
   Especially Medical  Surveillance Requirements,
  for EPA Employees Who Support OSWER Pro-
  grams.
  PB91 -921346/CDH               See 0923
PB91-921347/CDH
  EPA/U.S.  Army Corps of Engineers Payment
  Process, Direct Cite/Revised Reimbursement
  Methods.
  PB91-921347/CDH               See 1125
PB91-921348/CDH
  CERCLIS Listing.
  PB91-921348/CDH
See 0014
PB91-921349/CDH
  Superfund Docket Operations Manual for Rule-
  making Activities.
  PB91-921349/CDH               See 0081
PB91-921350/CDH
  Guide to Developing Superfund No Action, In-
  terim Action, and Contingency Remedy RODs.
  PB91-921350/CDH               See 1098
PB91-921351/CDH
  Guide to Addressing  Pre-ROD and Post-ROD
  Changes.
  PB91-921351/CDH               See 1096
PB91-921352/CDH
  Interim Guidance on  Establishing Soil Lead
  Cleanup Levels at Superfund Sites. Supple-
  ment to  Interim Guidance on  Establishing Soil
  Lead Cleanup Levels at Superfund Sites.
  PB91-921352/CDH               See 1516
PB91-921355/CDH
  Real Estate Acquisition Procedures for USAGE
  Projects.
  PB91-921355/CDH               See 1133
PB91-921356/CDH
  Guide to Pump and Treat Groundwater Reme-
  diation Technology.
  PB91-921356/CDH               See 1462
PB91-921357/CDH
  EPA Oversight of Remedial Designs  and  Re-
  medial Actions Performed by PRPs.
  PB91-921357/CDH                See 1124
PB91-921358/CDH
  Long-Term Contracting Strategy for Superfund
  - Implementation.
  PB91-921358/CDH                See 0043
PB91-921359/CDH
  Role of the Baseline  Risk Assessment in Su-
  perfund Remedy Selection Decisions.
  PB91-921359/CDH                See 1075
 PB91-921362/CDH
  Health and Safety Roles and Responsibilities
  at Remedial Sites.
  PB91-921362/CDH               See 0918
 PB91-921363/CDH
  ARARs Q's and A's Compliance with New
  SDWA National Primary Drinking  Water Regu-
   lations for Organic and  Inorganic Chemicals.
   PB91-921363/CDH               See 0400
 PB91-921364/CDH
   Guide  to  Discharging  CERCLA  Aqueous
   Wastes to Publicly Owned Treatment Works
   (POTWs).
   PB91-921364/CDH               See 0423
 PB91-921365/CDH
   Guide: Methods for  Evaluating the Attainment
   of Cleanup Standards  for  Soils and Solid
   Media.
   PB91-921365/CDH               See 1508
                                                                                                                          NU-47

-------
                PB91-921366/CDH
                                                       NUMBER INDEX
 I ,*
ft i
en:
il'fT
                PB91-921366/CDH
                  Furthering th» Use of  Innovative Treatment
                  Technologfes in OSWER Programs.
                  P89i-921366/CDH               See 1256
                PBfll-921367/CDH         /,'",;  ". ""',,," "',' ""', "
                  Gukte to Obtaining No Migration Variances for
                  CERCLA Remedial Actions.
                  PB91-921367/COH               See 0424
                PB91-921368/CDH
                  Structure and  Components of Five-Year Re-
                           '    "
                                             PB92-102169/CDH
                                               OSWER Source Book: Training and Technolo-
                                               gy Transfer Resources.
                                               PB92-1p2169/CH               See 1283
                                                                                   ''
       ,.   .     .   ................        ............
  ,PJ91:@?13g8/CpH ......................... See 1120
                                   '
                                     .•• ... ......     .. .....
                 Structure and Components of  Five-Year Re-
                 vtaws,
                 fB91.921369/CDH                See 1121
                PB91-921370/CDH
                 Update on Implementation of the Oil Pollution
                 Act of 1990. Volume 1, Number 1,  February
                 1991.
                 PB91.92137P/CPH                See 0936
                PB91-921371/CDH
                 Update on Implementation of the Oil Pollution
                 Act ol 1996. Volume 1. Number 2, April 1991.
                 P891-921371/CDH                See 0937
                                             '    '
                            ,        ,
  Update on Implementation of the Oil  Pollution
  Act of 1990, Volume 1. Number 3, June 1991.
  PB91:921372/CPH               See 0938
 PB91-921373/CDH
  Superfund Innovative Technology  Evaluation
  Technology Demonstration Summary: Chemfix
  SojfdMcatlon/StfibijIzatlon Process, Clackamas,
  Oregon.
  P891-921373/CDH               See 1564
 PB92-101435/CDH
  atoms' Guidance Manual for the Technical
  Ajsjstanca, Grant Program.
  PB92-101435/CDH               See 0463
 PB92-101963/CDH
  Adm!nlstrajiy,e perjajty Procedures.
  PS92-1 01 963/CDH               See 051 1
 PBp-10i997/CDH ........................................
  Eniferigerment Assessment Guidance. .....
  PB92-101997/CDH               See 0528
 PB92-102045/CDH
  Arbitration  Procedures  for  Small  Superfund
  Co« Recovery Claims.
  PJ92.102045/CDH ......................   §ee05J2
 PBi2:10206p/CDH ...... ~   ™ .  \ ..... ' ' , ', ........ . "," ,"''','
  Timaly  Initiation   of   Responsible   Party
  Searches. Issuance of Notice Letters,  and Re-
  l«iM of InfamjatjQfi (Attachment XXII).
  PS92.Jp2060/5fjli ......................................  See 0886
 PB92-102078/CDH
  tejeriro Guidelines for  Preparing Nonblnding
  Prttlminary Allocations of Responsibility.
  PB92-102078/CDH               See 0564
 PB92-iq2094/CDH [[[
  .Fjjgrt.EPA ,P°Woy on, the Inclusion of Enyiron-
  montal Auditing Provisions  in Enforcement Set-
  Uemorits.
; PB9,2-3,p2p94/CDH ........................     See 0541
 PB92-102136/CDH
  r^itU-MwSa   Settlements   of   Enforcement
  Cteim*.
  PB92-102136/CDH               See 0582
PB9,2-102144/CpH_r ...............
  E^nflwrientAssessmentHandbook.
  P892-102144/COH               See 0530
           .•.:•• .'   s, Jill ..... ir   'ail   i  ,   •   r   ,;r-
                                ,.   ,
  Site Enforcement Tracking  System  (SETS):
  PRP Report by Site for Region 1, September
  26, 1991.
  PB92-105246/CDH               See 0838
 PB92-105253/CDH
  Site Enforcement Tracking  System  (SETS):
  PRP Report by Site for Region 2, September
  26, 1991.
„ PB92-1Q5253/CPH               See 0839
 PB92-105261/CDH
  Site Enforcement Tracking  System  (SETS):
  PRP Report by Site for Region 3, September
  26, 1991.
  PB92-1 05261 /CDH               See 0840
 PB92-105279/CDH
  Site Enforcement Tracking  System  (SETS):
  PRP Report by Site for Region 4, September
  26, 1991.
  PB92-105279/CDH               See 0841
 PB92-105287/CDH
  Site Enforcement Tracking  System  (SETS):
  PRP Report by Site for Region 5, September
  26, 1991.
  PB92-105287/CDH               See 0842
 PB92-105295/CDH
  Site Enforcement Tracking  System  (SETS):
  PRP Report by Site for Region 6, September
  26, 1991.
  PB92-105295/CDH               See 0843
 PB92-105303/CDH
  Site Enforcement Tracking  System  (SETS):
  PRP Report by Site for Region 7, September
  26, 1991.
  PB92-105303/CDH               See 0844
 PB92-105311/CDH
  Site Enforcement Tracking  System  (SETS):
  PRP Report by Site for Region 8, September
  26, 1991.
  PB92-1 0531 1 /CDH               See 0845
PB92-105329/CDH
  Site Enforcement Tracking  System  (SETS):
  PRP Report by Site for Region 9, September
  26, 1991.
  PB92-105329/CDH               See 0846
PB92-105337/CDH
  Site  Enforcement Tracking  System  (SETS):
  PRP Report by Site for  Region 10, September
  26, 1991.
  PB92-105337/CDH               See 0847
PB92-105345/CDH
  Site  Enforcement Tracking  System  (SETS):
  Frequency by PRP Name Report, September
  26, 1991.
  PB92-105345/CDH               See 0610
PB92-105352/CDH
  Site  Enforcement Tracking System  (SETS):
  National  PRP Report by Site, September 26,
  1991.
  PB92-105352/CDH               See 0619
PB92-105360/CDH
  Site  Enforcement Tracking System  (SETS):
  National  Alphabetical Report by PRP  Name,
  September 26, 1991.
  PB92-105360/CDH               See 0612
PB92-105469/CDH
  Community Relations during Enforcement Ac-
  tivities and Development of the Administrative
  Record.
  PB92-105469/CDH               See 0466
 PB92-105485/CDH
   Revised Hazardous Waste Bankruptcy  Guid-
   ance, October?, 1991.
	,,^892-105485/00^,  	       	  362,0599	
 PB92-105857/CDH
   Pilot-Scale Incineration  of Contaminated Soil
   from the  Purity Oil Sales and McColl Super-
   fund Sites.
   PB92-105857/CDH               See 1290
 PB92-108166/CDH
   On-Site  Methods  for  Assessing  Chemical
   Impact  on the Soil Environment Using Earth-
   worms: A Case  Study at  the  Baird  and
   McGuire Superfund Site, Holbrook, Massachu-
   setts.
   PB92-108166/CDH               See 1521
 PB92-109065/CDH
   Guide  for  Conducting  Treatability  Studies
   under  CERCLA:   Aerobic   Biodegradation
   Remedy Screening. Interim Guidance.
   PB92-109065/CDH               See 1157
 PB92-109073/CDH
   Guide  for  Conducting  Treatability  Studies
   under  CERCLA:   Aerobic   Biodegradation
   Remedy Screening.
   PB92-109073/CDH               See 1156
 PB92-109081/CDH
   Superfund Engineering Issue:  Issues Affecting
   the Applicability and Success of Remedial/Re-
   moval Incineration  Projects.
   PB92-109081/CDH               See 1308
 PB92-114461/CDH
   Performance  Evaluations of  Pump-and-Treat
   Remediations.
   PB92-114461/CDH               See 1471
 PB92-115245/CDH
   BioTrol Soil Washing System for Treatment of
   a Wood Preserving Site: Applications Analysis
   Report.
   PB92-115245/CDH               See 1492
 PB92-115310/CDH
   Technology  Evaluation  Report: Biotrol  Soil
   Washing System for Treatment of a Wood Pre-
   serving Site. Volume 1.
   PB92-115310/CDH               See 1539
 PB92-115328/CDH
   Technology  Evaluation  Report: Biotrol  Soil
   Washing System for Treatment of a Wood Pre-
   serving Site. Volume 2, Part A.
   PB92-115328/CDH               See 1540
 PB92-115336/CDH
   Technology  Evaluation  Report: Biotrol  Soil
   Washing System for Treatment of a Wood Pre-
   serving Site. Volume 2, Part B.
   PB92-115336/CDH               See  1541
 PB92-119023/CDH
   DuPont/Oberlin Microfiltration Technology. Ap-
   plications Analysis  Report.
   PB92-119023/CDH               See  1584
 PB92-121367/CDH
   Extraction  of Mercury from Groundwater Using
   Immobilized Algae.
   PB92-121367/CDH               See  1450
 PB92-124171/CDH
   Toxicological Implementations of Remediating
   Hazardous Wastes.
   PB92-124171/CDH                See  1359
 PB92-124387/CDH
   U.S. EPA SITE Demonstration of AWD Tech-
   nologies' AquaDetox/SVE System.

-------
                                                       NUMBER INDEX
                                                                   PB92-152933/CDH
PB92-124551/CDH
  Application of a Plant Test System in the Iden-
  tification of  Potential  Genetic  Hazards  at
  Chemical Waste Sites.
  PB92-124551/CDH               See 1194
PB92-124767/CDH
  Mining  Sites on the National Priorities  List:
  NPL Site Summary Reports. Volume 1 (Alumi-
  num Company of America (Vancouver Smelter)
  to Cleveland Mill).
  PB92-124767/CDH               See 0350
PB92-124775/CDH
  Mining  Sites on the National Priorities  List:
  NPL Site Summary Reports. Volume 2 (Com-
  mencement Bay Nearshore/Tideflats to  Kerr
  McGee) (Kress  Creek,  Reed-Keppler  Park,
  Residential Areas,  Sewage Treatment Plant).
  PB92-124775/CDH               See 0351
PB92-124783/CDH
  Mining  Sites on the National Priorities  List:
  NPL Site Summary Reports. Volume 3 (Kerr-
  McGee Chemical Corp. (Soda Springs Plant) to
  Ormet Corp).
  PB92-124783/CDH               See 0352
PB92-124791/CDH
  Mining  Sites on the National Priorities  List:
  NPL Site Summary Reports. Volume 4 (Oron-
  ogo-Duenweg Mining Belt to Tar Creek).
  PB92-124791/CDH               See 0353
PB92-124809/CDH
  Mining  Sites on the National Priorities  List:
  NPL Site Summary Reports. Volume 5 (Tele-
  dyne Wah Chang to Wayne Interim Storage
  Facility/W.R. Grace).
  PB92-124809/CDH               See 0354
PB92-125749/CDH
  Superfund  Innovative Technology Evaluation:
  The Delaware SITE Study, 1989.
  PB92-125749/CDH               See 1322
PB92-125764/CDH
  International Symposium on  Field Screening
  Methods for  Hazardous  Wastes and  Toxic
  Chemicals  (2nd), Proceedings. Held in  Las
  Vegas, Nevada on February 12-14,1991.
  PB92-125764/CDH               See 1279
PB92-126838/CDH
  Removal of Creosote from Soil by Thermal De-
  sorption.
  PB92-126838/CDH               See 1530
PB92-126929/CDH
  Prospects  for  In situ Chemical Treatment for
  Contaminated Soil.
  PB92-126929/CDH               See 1525
PB92-129659/CDH
  Biodegradation of Creosote and  Pentachloro-
  phenol in Contaminated  Groundwater: Chemi-
  cal and Biological Assessment.
  PB92-129659/CDH               See 1432
PB92-129683/CDH
  Bench-Scale Evaluation of Alternative Biologi-
  cal Treatment Processes for the Remediation
  of Pentachlorophenol- and Creosote-Contami-
  nated  Materials: Slurry-Phase Bioremediation.
  PB92-129683/CDH               See 1419
PB92-129725/CDH
  Bench-Scale Evaluation of Alternative Biologi-
  cal Treatment Processes for the Remediation
  of Pentachlorophenol- and Creosote-Contami-
  nated  Materials: Solid-Phase Bioremediation.
  PB92-129725/CDH                See 1420
PB92-129733/CDH
  Detoxification of Pentachlorophenol and Creo-
  sote  Contaminated  Groundwater  by Physical
  Extraction:  Chemical  and Biological  Assess-
  ment.
  PB92-129733/CDH               See 1438
PB92-131374/CDH
  Index to the Monthly Hotline Report Questions
  (June 1982 to December 1991).
  PB92-131374/CDH               See 0139
PB92-131390/CDH
  Inside the Hotline:  A  Compilation  of 1991
  Monthly Hotline Reports.
  PB92-131390/CDH               See 0140
PB92-136878/CDH
  Evaluation  of Waste  Stabilized  by the Solidi-
  tech SITE Technology.
  PB92-136878/CDH               See 1554
PB92-136936/CDH
  Demonstration of Microfiltration Technology.
  PB92-136936/CDH               See 1228
PB92-139401/CDH
  EPA  SITE Demonstration of the Horsehead
  Resource Development Company Flame Reac-
  tor Technology.
  PB92-139401/CDH               See 1242
PB92-139476/CDH
  Superfund Soils Data Management System.
  PB92-139476/CDH               See 1536
PB92-139500/CDH
  Site  Enforcement Tracking System  (SETS):
  PRP National Listing by Site, January 22,1992.
  PB92-139500/CDH               See 0837
PB92-139518/CDH
  Site  Enforcement Tracking System  (SETS):
  PRP National Frequency by Party Name, Janu-
  ary 22, 1992.
  PB92-139518/CDH               See 0825
PB92-139526/CDH
  Site  Enforcement Tracking System  (SETS):
  PRP  National Listing Alphabetically by Party
  Name, January 22, 1992.
  PB92-139526/CDH               See 0831
PB92-139534/CDH
  Site  Enforcement Tracking System  (SETS):
  PRP  Listing by Site for  Region  1, January 22,
  1992.
  PB92-139534/CDH               See 0741
PB92-139542/CDH
  Site  Enforcement Tracking System  (SETS):
  PRP  Listing by Site for  Region  2, January 22,
  1992.
  PB92-139542/CDH               See 0746
PB92-139559/CDH
  Site  Enforcement Tracking System  (SETS):
  PRP  Listing by Site for  Region  3, January 22,
  1992.
  PB92-139559/CDH               See 0750
PB92-139567/CDH
  Site  Enforcement Tracking System  (SETS):
  PRP  Listing by Site for  Region  4, January 22,
  1992.
  PB92-139567/CDH               See 0755
PB92-139575/CDH
  Site  Enforcement Tracking System  (SETS):
  PRP  Listing by Site for  Region  5, January 22,
  1992.
  PB92-139575/CDH               See 0760
PB92-139583/CDH
  Site  Enforcement Tracking System  (SETS):
  PRP  Listing by Site for  Region  6, January 22,
  1992.
  PB92-139583/CDH               See 0765
PB92-139591/CDH
  Site Enforcement Tracking System  (SETS):
  PRP Listing by Site for Region 7, January 22,
  1992.
  PB92-139591 /CDH               See 0770
PB92-139609/CDH
  Site Enforcement Tracking System  (SETS):
  PRP Listing by Site for Region 8, January 22,
  1992.
  PB92-139609/CDH               See 0775
PB92-139617/CDH
  Site Enforcement Tracking System  (SETS):
  PRP Listing by Site for Region 9, January 22,
  1992.
  PB92-139617/CDH               See 0780
PB92-139625/CDH
  Site Enforcement Tracking System  (SETS):
  PRP Listing by Site for Region 10, January 22,
  1992.
  PB92-139625/CDH               See 0785
PB92-143494/CDH
  Limited-Use Chemical Protective Clothing for
  EPA Superfund Activities.
  PB92-143494/CDH               See 1058
PB92-143676/CDH
  Air/Superfund  National  Technical  Guidance
  Study Series: Estimation of Air Impacts for Soil
  Vapor Extraction (SVE) Systems.
  PB92-143676/CDH               See 1383
PB92-143791/CDH
  Quality and  Environmental Protection:  The
  EPA QA Program.
  PB92-143791 /CDH               See 0990
PB92-144021/CDH
  Control of Aromatic Waste Air Streams by Soil
  Bioreactors.
  PB92-144021/CDH               See 1496
PB92-145564/CDH
  Organic   Contract  Compliance   Screening
  System. Software for the PC (OLM01.8 Version
  1). User Manual.
  PB92-145564/CDH               See 0057
PB92-145572/CDH
  Organic   Contract  Compliance   Screening
  System.  Software for the PC  (SOW March
  1990, Version 1). User Manual.
  PB92-145572/CDH               See 0059
PB92-145580/CDH
  Organic   Contract  Compliance   Screening
  System.  Software for the PC (Version June
  1990). User Manual.
  PB92-145580/CDH               See 0060
PB92-145598/CDH
  Inorganic   Contract  Compliance  Screening
  System Software for the PC (SOW March 1990
  Version 1). User Manual.
  PB92-145598/CDH               See 0041
PB92-150416/CDH
  Control Technologies for Defunct lead Battery
  Recycling Sites: Overview and Recent Devel-
  opments. Volume 3.
  PB92-150416/CDH               See 1220
PB92-150655/CDH
  EPA  SITE Demonstration of the BioTrol  Soil
  Washing Process.
  PB92-150655/CDH               See 1502
PB92-152933/CDH
  Developments in Chemical Treatment of  Con-
  taminated Soil.
  PB92-152933/CDH               See 1499
                                                                                                                          NU-49

-------
PB92-152941/CDH
            NUMBER INDEX
PB92-152941/CDH
  PAST: Tha Potential  ARARs Selection  Tool.
  PB92-1 52941 /CDH                See 0434
PB92-153410/CDH
  Technology Evaluation Report SITE Program
  Demonstration of the  DuPont/Oberiin Microfil-
  teation Technology.
  PB92-153410/CDH                See 1350
PB92-164490/CDH
  Application  of  a Water  Quality  Assessment
  Modeling System at a Superfund Site.
  P892-164490/CDH                See 1573
PB32-16S743/CDH
           Protection through Reconnaissance
  Robotics at Superfund Remedial Sites.
PB92-1690X4/CDH
  Guide  for  Conducting  Treatability  Studies
  under CERCLA: Chemical Dehatogenatton.
  PB92-169044/CDH                See 1161
PB92-169275/CDH
  Cfwmlcal Dohatogenatfon Treatability  Studies
  under CGRCtA: An Overview.
  PB92-169275/CDH                See 1209
PB92-169564/COH
  Organic  Contract   Compliance  Screening
  System, Software for the PC (OLM01 .8 Version
  2) (User Manual).
  ES92-189564/CDH                See n°58
PB92-170190/CDH
  Superfund Innovative  Technology Evaluation
  Program Demonstration Plan for Westinghouse
  Bio-Analytic Systems  Pentachlorophenol Im-
  Puncissays. ........................ ..................... " ................... ' .........
  PB92-170190/CDH                See 1310
PBS2-170570/CDH
  Guide  for  Conducting  Treatability  Studies
  CBder CSRCtA: SoH Washing.  Interim Guid-
  ance.
  PB92-170570/CDH                See 1165
PB,9;2-17Q58«/CpH;;,, ........... ,   _, ............ „  ..  ,  ,  , _,„_,
 1 gjjjy^  jo,. ' Cond'ucBng ........... Treatability"  Studies
  UftdOr CERCLA: Soil Washing:  Quick  Refer-
  ence Fact Sheet.
 , P892-1705§8/Cp|| ............................ See 1166
PB92-171909/cbH
  AWSuparfund National Technical  Guidance
  Study Series. Guideline for Predictive Baseline
  EmJstiorts Estimation  Procedures  for Super-
  fund Sites.
  PB92-171909/COH                See 1387
PB92-171917/CDH
  Air  Suporiund  National Technical  Guidance
  Study Series. Screening Procedures for Esti-
  mating  the Air Impacts of Incineration at Su-
  perfund Sites.
  PB92-171917/CDH                See 1389
PB92-171925/CDH
  Air  Superfund  National Technical  Guidance
  Study Series. Estimation of Air Impacts for the
  Excavation of Contaminated Soil.
  P892-17192S/CDH                See 1384
PB»2;173087/CpH
  QRJt  Enfofcomeni  Tracking System (SETS):
  (aaUpnai PRP,, Using by Site.
  P892-173087/CDH                Sae0617
PB5Z-173095/CDH ....................................
  SJlf  Enforcement  Irackjng System (SETS):
  National PRP Listing  Alphabetically by PRP
  Mama.
  PB92-173095/CDH               See 0615
 PB92-173103
   Site  Enforcement  Tracking System  (SETS):
   National Frequency by PRP Name Report.
   PB92-173103                    See 0614
 PB92-173111/CDH
   Site  Enforcement  Tracking System  (SETS):
   PRP Listing by Site for Region 1.
   PB92-173111 /CDH               See 0738
 PB92-173129/CDH
   Site  Enforcement  Tracking System  (SETS):
   PRP Listing by Site for Region 2.
   PB92-173129/CDH               See 0743
 PB92-173137/CDH
   Site  Enforcement  Tracking System  (SETS):
   PRP Listing by Site for Region 3.
   PB92-173137/CDH               See 0748
 PB92-173145/CDH
   Site  Enforcement  Tracking System  (SETS):
   PRP Listing by Site for Region 4.
   PB92-173145/CDH               See 0752
 PB92-173152/CDH
,.,  Site  Enforcement  Tracking System  (SETS):
   PRP Listing by Site for Region 5.
   PB92-173152/CDH               See 0757
 PB92-173160/CDH
   Site  Enforcement  Tracking System  (SETS):
   PRP Listing by Site for Region 6.
   PB92-173160/CDH               See 0762
 PB92-173178/CDH
   Site  Enforcement  Tracking System  (SETS):
   PRP Listing by Site for Region 7.
   PB92-173178/CDH               See 0767
 PB92-173186/CDH
   Site  Enforcement  Tracking System  (SETS):
   PRP Listing by Site for Region 8.
   PB92-173186/CDH               See 0772
 PB92-173194/CDH
   Site  Enforcement  Tracking System  (SETS):
   PRP Listing by Site for Region 9.
   PB92-173194/CDH               See 0777
 PB92-173202/CDH
   Site  Enforcement  Tracking System  (SETS):
   PRP Listing by Site for Region 10.
   PB92-173202/CDH               See 0782
 PB92-173210/CDH
   Innovative  Treatment  Technologies:   Semi-
   Annual Status Report. (Third Edition).
   PB92-173210/CDH               See 1275
 PB92-178953/CDH
   Pilot-Scale Incineration  of  PCB-Contaminated
   Sediments from the New Bedford Harbor Hot
   Spot Superfund Site.
   PB92-178953/CDH               See 1292
 PB92-179001/CDH
   Innovative Treatment Technologies: Overview
   and Guide to Information Sources.
   PB92-179001/CDH               See 1272
 PB92-179043/CDH
   Incineration Data on Arsenic and Lead  Emis-
   sions.
   PB92-179043/CDH               See 1267
 PB92-179670/CDH
   Demonstration of  Waste Treatment Technol-
   PB92-17967U/CDH               See 1229
 PB92-179845/CDH
   Behavior of Arsenic in a Rotary Kiln Incinerator
   (Journal Version).
   PB92-179845/CDH               See 1204
 PB92-180025/CDH
   In situ Soil Flushing. Engineering Bulletin.
   PB92-180025/CDH               See 1510
PB92-180033/CDH
  Air Stripping of Aqueous Solutions. Engineering
  Bulletin.
  PB92-180033/CDH               See 1371
PB92-180041/CDH
  Control of Air Emissions from Materials Han-
  dling during Remediation. Engineering Bulletin.
  PB92-180041/CDH               See 1398
PB92-180058/CDH
  Granular  Activated Carbon  Treatment. Engi-
  neering Bulletin.
  PB92-180058/CDH               See 1258
PB92-180066/CDH
  Chemical   Oxidation  Treatment.  Engineering
  Bulletin.
  PB92-180066/CDH               See 1211
PB92-180074/CDH
  Chemical  Enhancements  to Pump-and-Treat
  Remediation. Ground Water Issue.
  PB92-180074/CDH               See 1434
PB92-182427/CDH
  Future Land Use Scenarios  for Federal Facili-
  ties.
  PB92-182427/CDH               See 0897
PB92-188713/CDH
  Superfund Innovative  Technology  Evaluation
  (Site) Report for the Westinghouse Bio-Analyt-
  ic Systems Pentachlorophenol (PCP) Immun-
  oassays.
  PB92-188713/CDH               See 1321
PB92-191188/CDH
  Solidification/Stabilization:  Is It Always Appro-
  priate.
  PB92-191188/CDH               See 1560
PB92-196013/CDH
  Estimating VOC  Emissions from  Superfund
  Sites in the  Houston-Galveston  Texas Area.
  (NNEMS Project No. 1302).
  PB92-196013/CDH               See 1406
PB92-205855/CDH
  Technology Evaluation Report: SITE Program
  Demonstration Test Horsehead Resource De-
  velopment Company,  Inc.,  Flame  Reactor
  Technology, Monaca, Pennsylvania.
  PB92-205855/CDH               See 1353
PB92-206267/CDH
  Comparison: Organic  Emissions from Hazard-
  ous Waste Incinerators versus the 1990 Toxics
  Release Inventory Air Releases.
  PB92-206267/CDH               See 1217
PB92-206424/CDH
  Long-Path  FTIR Measurements of Volatile Or-
  ganic Compounds In an Industrial Setting (July
  1989-April 1991).
  PB92-206424/CDH               See 1413
PB92-206432/CDH
  Canister-Based  Method for  Monitoring Toxic
  VOCs in Ambient Air.
  PB92-206432/CDH               See 1396
PB92-206895/CDH
  Evaluation of  Personal Cooling  Devices  for
  Dioxin Clean-Up Operation.
  PB92-206895/CDH               See 1248
PB92-213214/CDH
  Horsehead Resource  Development Company,
  Inc. Flame Reactor Technology: Applications
  Analysis Report.
  PB92-213214/CDH               See 1263
NU-50

-------
                                                       NUMBER  INDEX
                                                                   PB92-233071/CDH
PB92-216035/CDH
  Technology Evaluation Report of Retech, Inc.,
  Plasma Centrifugal Furnace. Volume 1.
  PB92-216035/CDH               See 1340
PB92-216043/CDH
  Technology Evaluation Report of Retech, Inc.,
  Plasma Centrifugal Furnace. Volume 2.
  PB92-216043/CDH               See 1341
PB92-216936/CDH
  On-Site Engineering Report for the Low-Tem-
  perature Thermal  Desorption Pilot-Scale Test
  on Contaminated Soil.
  PB92-216936/CDH               See 1519
PB92-217108/CDH
  Respirometric  Methods for  Determination  of
  Biodegradability and Biodegradation  Kinetics
  for Hazardous Organic Pollutant Compounds.
  PB92-217108/CDH            .   See 1427
PB92-217231/CDH
  Application  of  Tradescantia  Micronucleus
  Assay for In situ Evaluation of Potential Genet-
  ic Hazards from Exposure to Chemicals at a
  Wood-Preserving Site.
  PB92-217231/CDH               See 1195
PB92-217322/CDH
  Development of Emerging Technologies within
  the SITE Program.
  PB92-217322/CDH               See 1231
PB92-218379/CDH
  AWD  Technologies  Integrated  AquaDetox
  (Trade  Name)/SVE Technology: Applications
  Analysis Report.
  PB92-218379/CDH               See 1202
PB92-218791/CDH
  Retech, Inc.,  Plasma Centrifugal Furnace: Ap-
  plications Analysis Report.
  PB92-218791/CDH               See 1295
PB92-219732/CDH
 • Forum on Innovative Hazardous Waste Treat-
  ment Technologies (3rd):  Domestic and Inter-
  national. Held in Dallas, Texas on June 11-13,
  1991. Technical Papers.
  PB92-219732/CDH               See 1254
PB92-220029/CDH
  Site Enforcement  Tracking  System  (SETS):
  PRP Listing by Site for  Region 1.
  PB92-220029/CDH               See 0739
PB92-220037/CDH
  Site Enforcement  Tracking  System  (SETS):
  PRP Listing by Site for  Region 2.
  PB92-220037/CDH               See 0744
PB92-220052/CDH
  Site Enforcement  Tracking  System  (SETS):
  PRP Listing by Site for  Region 4.
  PB92-220052/CDH               See 0753
PB92-220060/CDH
  Site Enforcement  Tracking  System  (SETS):
  PRP Listing by Site for  Region 5.
  PB92-220060/CDH               See 0758
PB92-220078/CDH
  Site Enforcement  Tracking  System  (SETS):
  PRP Listing by Site for  Region 6.
  PB92-220078/CDH               See 0763
PB92-220086/CDH
  Site Enforcement  Tracking  System  (SETS):
  PRP Listing by Site for  Region 7.
  PB92-220086/CDH               See 0768
PB92-220094/CDH
  Site Enforcement  Tracking  System  (SETS):
  PRP Listing by Site for  Region 8.
  PB92-220094/CDH               See 0773
PB92-220102/CDH
  Site  Enforcement  Tracking System  (SETS):
  PRP Listing by Site for Region 9.
  PB92-220102/CDH               See 0778
PB92-220110/CDH
  Site  Enforcement  Tracking System  (SETS):
  PRP Listing by Site for Region 10.
  PB92-220110/CDH               See 0783
PB92-220128/CDH
  Site  Enforcement  Tracking System  (SETS):
  National PRP Listing by Site.
  PB92-220128/CDH               See 0618
PB92-220136/CDH
  Site  Enforcement  Tracking System  (SETS):
  National PRP Listing Alphabetically by PRP
  Name.
  PB92-220136/CDH               See 0616
PB92-221985/CDH
  Tech Trends (Number 8).
  PB92-221985/CDH               See 1328
PB92-222215/CDH
  Technology  Evaluation  Report: Babcock and
  Wilcox Cyclone Furnace Vitrification Technolo-
  gy. Volume 1.
  PB92-222215/CDH               See 1337
PB92-222223/CDH
  Technology  Evaluation  Report: Babcock and
  Wilcox Cyclone Furnace Vitrification Technolo-
  gy. Volume 2.
  PB92-222223/CDH               See 1338
PB92-223213/CDH
  Tracking Toxic Substances at Industrial Facili-
  ties: Engineering Mass Balance versus Materi-
  als Accounting.
  PB92-223213/CDH               See 1362
PB92-224294/CDH
  Super-fund  Innovative Technology  Evaluation
  Program: Technology Profiles, Fourth Edition.
  PB92-224294/CDH               See 1316
PB92-224336/CDH
  In-situ Bioremediation of Contaminated Ground
  Water.
  PB92-224336/CDH               See 1465
PB92-224351/CDH
  Technology Demonstration Summary, DuPont/
  Oberlin   Microfiltration  System,  Palmerton,
  Pennsylvania. April-May 1992.
  PB92-224351/CDH               See 1336
PB92-224377/CDH
  Guide  for  Conducting  Treatability  Studies
  under  CERCLA:   Aerobic   Biodegradation
  Remedy Screening.  Quick Reference  Fact
  Sheet.
  PB92-224377/CDH               See 1158
PB92-224385/CDH
  Guidance on  Site  Assessment Cooperative
  Agreements.
  PB92-224385/CDH               See 0475
PB92-224393/CDH
  Technology Demonstration Summary: Bio Trol
  Soil Washing System for Treatment of a Wood
  Preserving Site.
  PB92-224393/CDH               See 1538
PB92-224401/CDH
  Guide  for  Conducting  Treatability  Studies
  under CERCLA:  Soil Vapor Extraction. Quick
  Reference Fact Sheet.
  PB92-224401/CDH               See 1164
PB92-224708/CDH
  Bioremediation  in  the  Field: An  Information
  Update  on  Applying Bioremediation  to Site
  Cleanup. (Number 4).
  PB92-224708/CDH               See 1423
PB92-224716/CDH
  Vendor  Information  System  for  Innovative
  Treatment Technologies (VISITT). Number 1.
  PB92-224716/CDH               See 1370
PB92-224724/CDH
  Ground-Water Issue:  The  Effects of  Well
  Casing Material on Ground Water-Quality.
  PB92-224724/CDH               See 1457
PB92-224799/CDH
  Superfund  Innovative  Technology  Evaluation
  Program:  Progress  and  Accomplishments,
  Fiscal Year 1990.  A Fourth  Report to Con-
  gress.
  PB92-224799/CDH               See 1312
PB92-224807/CDH
  Bioremediation in the  Field. An Information
  Update on  Applying Bioremediation  to Site
  Clean-Up. Number 3.
  PB92-224807/CDH               See 1422
PB92-226448/CDH
  Technology  Evaluation  Report: Site Program
  Demonstration of a Trial Excavation  at  the
  McColl Superfund Site.
  PB92-226448/CDH               See 1349
PB92-227271/CDH
  Guide  for  Conducting  Treatability  Studies
  under CERCLA: Soil Vapor Extraction.  Interim
  Guidance.
  PB92-227271/CDH               See 1163
PB92-227289/CDH
  Technology Evaluation Report: Ogden Circulat-
  ing Bed Combustor at  the McColl Superfund
  Site.
  PB92-227289/CDH               See 1344
PB92-227321/CDH
  Pilot-Scale Incineration  of PCB-Contaminated
  Sediments from the Hot Spot  of the New Bed-
  ford Harbor Superfund Site.
  PB92-227321/CDH               See 1291
PB92-227388/CDH
  Control Technologies for Remediation of Con-
  taminated Soil and Waste Deposits at Super-
  fund Lead Battery Recycling Sites.
  PB92-227388/CDH               See 1221
PB92-230358/CDH
  BEN: A Model to Calculate the Economic Ben-
  efit of Noncompliance. User's  Manual.
  PB92-230358/CDH               See 0513
PB92-231299/CDH
  Chemical  Dehalogenation Treatability Studies
  under CERCLA: An Overview.
  PB92-231299/CDH               See 1153
PB92-231307/CDH
  Guide  for  Conducting  Treatability  Studies
  under  CERCLA:  Chemical  Dehalogenation.
  Final Report.
  PB92-231307/CDH               See 1162
PB92-232388/CDH
  Procuring Innovative Technologies at Remedial
  Sites: Q's and A's and Case Studies.
  PB92-232388/CDH               See 1132
PB92-232396/CDH
  Citizen's Guide to Thermal Desorption.
  PB92-232396/CDH               See 0460
PB92-233071/CDH
  Citizen's Guide to How  Innovative Treatment
  Technologies Are Being Successfully Applied
  at Superfund Sites.
  PB92-233071/CDH               See 0455
                                                                                                                           NU-51

-------
Mint !••'
fVf t
(ilit.'i
!	t   ,',
II   ,!s
                PS92-233089/CDH
PB92-2330B9/CDH
  Clzon^'Gffiato'Solvenr'Extraction.'''	
   	$?m§(sm	!l"i!il!l >.';<' l
-------
                                                       NUMBER INDEX
                                                                    PB92-963288/CDH
PB92-963214/CDH
  National Priorities List Sites: Missouri.
  PB92-963214/CDH               See 0221
PB92-963215/CDH
  National Priorities List Sites: Utah.
  PB92-963215/CDH               See 0277
PB92-963216/CDH
  National  Priorities  List  Sites: Arizona  and
  Nevada.
  PB92-963216/CDH               See 0157
PB92-963217/CDH
  National Priorities List Sites: Virginia.
  PB92-963217/CDH               See 0283
PB92-963218/CDH
  National Priorities List Sites: Maryland.
  PB92-963218/CDH               See 0206
PB92-963219/CDH
  National Priorities List Sites: Idaho.
  PB92-963219/CDH               See 0182
PB92-963220/CDH
  National Priorities List Sites: Arkansas.
  PB92-963220/CDH               See 0160
PB92-963221/CDH
  National Priorities List Sites: Oklahoma.
  PB92-963221/CDH               See 0251
PB92-963222/CDH
  National Priorities List Sites: Louisiana.
  PB92-963222/CDH               See 0200
PB92-963223/CDH
  National Priorities List Sites: Alabama.
  PB92-963223/CDH               See 0149
PB92-963224/CDH
  National Priorities List Sites: Mississippi.
  PB92-963224/CDH               See 0218
PB92-963225/CDH
  National Priorities List Sites: Tennessee.
  PB92-963225/CDH               See 0270
PB92-963226/CDH
  National Priorities List Sites: Georgia.
  PB92-963226/CDH               See 0178
PB92-963227/CDH
  National Priorities List Sites: Kentucky.
  PB92-963227/CDH               See 0197
PB92-963228/CDH
  National Priorities List Sites: Delaware.
  PB92-963228/CDH               See 0172
PB92-963229/CDH
  National Priorities List Sites: West Virginia.
  PB92-963229/CDH               See 0289
PB92-963230/CDH
  National Priorities List Sites: Rhode Island.
  PB92-963230/CDH               See 0263
PB92-963231/CDH
  National Priorities List Sites: Vermont.
  PB92-963231/CDH               See 0280
PB92-963232/CDH
  National Priorities List Sites: New Mexico.
  PB92-963232/GDH               See 0236
PB92-963233/CDH
  National Priorities List Sites: Nebraska.
  PB92-963233/CDH               See 0227
PB92-963234/CDH
  National Priorities List Sites: Iowa.
  PB92-963234/CDH               See 0191
PB92-963235/CDH
  National Priorities List Sites: Montana.
  PB92-963235/CDH               See 0224
PB92-963236/CDH
  National Priorities List Sites: North Dakota and
  South Dakota.
  PB92-963236/CDH                See 0246
PB92-963237/CDH
  National Priorities List Sites: Colorado.
  PB92-963237/CDH                See 0166
PB92-963238/CDH
  National Priorities List Sites: Wyoming.
  PB92-963238/CDH                See 0295
PB92-963239/CDH
  National Priorities List Sites: California  and
  Hawaii.
  PB92-963239/CDH                See 0163
PB92-963240/CDH
  National Priorities List Sites: Pennsylvania.
  PB92-963240/CDH                See 0257
PB92-963241/CDH
  National Priorities List Sites: New Jersey.
  PB92-963241/CDH                See 0233
PB92-963242/CDH
  National Priorities List Sites: American Samoa,
  Guam, and the Trust Territories.
  PB92-963242/CDH                See 0154
PB92-963243/CDH
  National Priorities List Sites: Wisconsin.
  PB92-963243/CDH                See 0292
PB92-963244/CDH
  National Priorities List Sites: Washington.
  PB92-963244/CDH                See 0286
PB92-963245/CDH
  National Priorities  List Sites: Oregon.
  PB92-963245/CDH                See 0254
PB92-963246/CDH
  National Priorities  List Sites: Ohio.
  PB92-963246/CDH                See 0248
PB92-963247/CDH
  National Priorities  List Sites: Michigan.
  PB92-963247/CDH                See 0212
PB92-963248/CDH
  National Priorities  List Sites: Illinois.
  PB92-963248/CDH                See 0185
PB92-963249/CDH
  National Priorities  List Sites: Indiana.
  PB92-963249/CDH                See 0188
PB92-963250/CDH
  National Priorities  List Sites: Florida.
  PB92-963250/CDH                See 0175
PB92-963251/CDH
  National Priorities  List Sites: Alaska.
  PB92-963251/CDH                See 0152
PB92-963252/CDH
  Superfund: Focusing on the Nation at Large.
  1991 Update.
  PB92-963252/CDH                See 0323
PB92-963253/CDH
  National Priorities  List Sites Set (1991).
  PB92-963253/CDH                See 0265
PB92-963256/CDH
  Progress Toward Implementing   Superfund,
  Fiscal Year 1990: A Report to the Congress.
  PB92-963256/CDH                See 0301
PB92-963257/CDH
  Superfund Contracts Management Issues.
  PB92-963257/CDH                See 0072
PB92-963258/CDH
  Implementation  of the Alternative  Remedial
  Contracting Strategy (ARCS) Task Force Rec-
  ommendations: Transmittal of the Implementa-
  tion Plan.
  PB92-963258/CDH                See 0030
PB92-963259/CDH
  Regional Pilot Projects and Initiatives.
  PB92-963259/CDH               See 0064
PB92-963260/CDH
  Congressional Limits for FY 92 Alternative Re-
  medial  Contracting Strategy (ARCS)  Program
  Management Costs.
  PB92-963260/CDH               See 0022
PB92-963261/CDH
  National Oil and Hazardous Substances Pollu-
  tion Contingency Plan (The NCP).
  PB92-963261/CDH               See 0146
PB92-963262/CDH
  Superfund  Policy  Forum  Update, Volume 1,
  Number 1, February 1992.
  PB92-963262/CDH               See 0324
PB92-963263/CDH
  Superfund    Accelerated   Cleanup    Model
  (SACM).
  PB92-963263/CDH               See 0119
PB92-963265/CDH
  Superfund Progress, Spring 1992.
  PB92-963265/CDH               See 0329
PB92-963267/CDH
  Superfund  Progress  - Aficionado's  Version
  (Progress as of March 31,1992).
  PB92-963267/CDH               See 0326
PB92-963272/CDH
  Smart Moves in Superfund - Regional Initia-
  tives. Volume 1,  Number 1,  February 1992.
  PB92-963272/CDH               See 0305
PB92-963273/CDH
  Regional Pilots and Applications of Superfund
  Accelerated Cleanup Model (SACM).
  PB92-963273/CDH               See 0110
PB92-963274/CDH
  Contracting  and Subcontracting Guide to the
  Superfund Program.
  PB92-963274/CDH               See 0023
PB92-963278/CDH
  Superfund  Progress  - Aficionado's  Version:
  Progress as of June 30,1992.
  PB92-963278/CDH               See 0325
PB92-963279/CDH
  Superfund Progress, Summer 1992.
  PB92-963279/CDH               See 0330
PB92-963282/CDH
  ARARs Fact Sheet: Compliance with the Clean
  Air Act and  Associated  Air Quality  Require-
  ments.
  PB92-963282/CDH               See 0397
PB92-963283/CDH
  Superfund:  Qualified Disadvantaged  Business
  Utilization in State Response.
  PB92-963283/CDH               See 0498
PB92-963284/CDH
  Regional Guide: Issuing Site-Specific Treatabil-
  ity Variances for Contaminated Soils  and
  Debris from Land Disposal Restrictions (LDRs).
  PB92-963284/CDH               See 1528
PB92-963287/CDH
  Superfund    Accelerated   Cleanup    Model
  (SACM). Volume   1,   Number 4,  November
  1992.
  PB92-963287/CDH               See 0122
PB92-963288/CDH
  Superfund: Report of the EPA Superfund Revi-
  talization Public  Meeting  Held  on June  24,
  1992. Volumes 1 and 2.
  PB92-963288/CDH               See 0333
                                                                                                                           NU-53

-------
PB92-963302/CDH
          NUMBER  INDEX
PB92-963302/CDH
  t>A".§oora Software^ Version 1.6. Users Manual
  aW Tutorial.
  P152.963302/CDH               see 0371
  Gukiartca for Performing ..... Preliminary Assess-
  ments urjdor CERCLA.
  pj92.^3u3/cW" ..... \   " '.'.','      !, See 0342
PB'i2-983,M4/CDH,"I,'   . I    ,  „'    ".'  ..'."..
  NPL Characterization Project: National Results.
  P892.963304/CDH               See 0355
PB92-963305/CDH
  NPL 'Characterization Project: Region 1  Re-
  sults.
  PB92-963305/CDH               See 0356
PB92-953307/CDH
  NPL  Characterization Project: Region 3 Re-
  sults.                    .........
  PSS2-963307/CDH               See 0357
PB92-963308/CDH
  NPL  Characterization Project Region 4 Re-
  «fts, .............................................
  Pfi92:963308/CDH               See 0358
PB9M63309/CDH ...........................
  NPL  Characterization Project: Region 5 Re-
  sults,
  J!ii%a633Q9/CDHl"   II   '    ,'SeeQ359
PB92-963310/CDH
  t*IPL"  Characterization Project:" Region 6 Re-
  sults.
  PB92-963310/CDH               See 0360
PB92-963311/CDH
  NPL  Characterization Project Region 7 Re-
  suits.
  PB92-96331 1 /COH               See 0361
PB92-963312/CDH
  NPL  Characterization Project Region 8 Re-
  sults,
  PB92- 06331 2/CDH               See 0362
PB92-963313/CDH
  NPL  Characterization Project Region 9 Re-
  sjufts.  '          .........
  PB92.963313/CDH               See 0363
PB52.963314/CbH
  NPL  Characterization Project: Region 10 Re-
  Suits.
  PS92-963314/CDH               See 0364
PB|i?-963315/CpH   ...... '„   ".. ..... "'   '     .." ....... I
  CERCLIS  Characterization  Project:  National
            .............................
  PB92-963315/CPH,               See 0001
PBS2-963316/CDH
  GERQLIS Characterization Project: Region  1
  l-Jfsuits. ...........................
  pjij02-9633i6/CDHiy  , ,"'   ,     see 6002
PB92-963317/CDH  """"ll   ' '" ............ .......
  CERCLIS Characterization Project: Region  Z
  Rcwtts.
  f*892-963317/COH               See 0003
PB92-963318/CDH
  CERCLIS Characterization Project Region  3
  Results,
  PB92-963318/CDH               See 0004
PB92-963319/CDH
  CERCLIS Characterization Project Region  4
  Results.
  PB92-963319/COH               See 0005
PB92-963320/CDH
  CERCLIS Characterization Project Region  5
  Rf SU'itS.
  P892-S63320/COH               See 0006
PB92-963321/CDH
  CERCLIS Characterization Project: Region 6"
  Results.
  PB92-963321/CbH               See 0007
PB92-963322/CDH
  CERCLIS Characterization Project: Region 7
  Results.
  PB92-963322/CpH               See 0008
PB92-963323/CDH
  CERCLIS Characterization Project: Region 8
  Results.
  PB92-963323/CDH               See 0009
PB92-963324/CDH
  CERCLIS Characterization Project: Region 9
  Results.
  PB92-963324/CDH               See 0010
PB92-963325/CDH
  CERCLIS Characterization Project: Region 10
  Results.
  PB92-963325/CDH               See 0011
PB92-963326/CDH
  Revised  Hazard Ranking  System: Evaluating
  Sites After Waste Removals.
  PB92-963326/CDH               See 0379
PB92-963327/CDH
  Revision  of  Policy  Regarding  Superfund
  Project Assignment between Alternative Reme-
  dial Contracting Strategy Contractors  and the
  U.S. Army Corps of Engineers.
  PB92-963327/CDH               See 0068
PB92-963328/CDH
  Audits and the Superfund Program Manager.
  PB92-963328/CDH               See 0087
PB92-963330/CDH
  Political Subdivision Involvement in Superfund.
  PB92-963330/CDH               See 0480
PB92-963331/CDH
  Debarment and Suspension.
  PB92-963331/CDH               See 0470
PB92-963332/CDH
  Administrative Guidance for the FIT to ARCS
  (FIT/ARCS) Transition.
  PB92-963332/CDH               See 0017
PB92-963333/CDH
  Risk Assessment  Guidance for  Superfund.
  Volume  1. Human Health Evaluation Manual
  (Part B, Development of  Risk-Based Prelimi-
  nary Remediation Goals).
  PB92-9633337CDH               See 1068
PB92-963334/CDH
  Risk Assessment  Guidance for  Superfund.
  Vojume  1. Human Health Evaluation Manual
  (Part C,  Risk Evaluation of Remedial Alterna-
  tives).
  PB92-963334/CDH               See 1070
PB92-963335/CDH
  ECO Update: Ecological Assessment of Super-
  fund Sites. An Overview. Volume 1, Number 2,
  December 1991.
  PB92-963335/CDH               See 1019
PB92-963336/CDH
  Homeowners Exempted from Superfund Clean-
  up Costs: National Policy Overview.
  PB92-963336/CDH               See 0426
PB92-963337/CDH
  ECO Update: The Role of BTAGs in Ecological
  Assessment. Volume 1, Number 1, September
  1991.
  PB92-963337/CDH               See 1020
PB92-963338/CDH
  Estimating Potential for Occurrence of DNAPL
  at Superfund Sites.
  PB92-963338/CDH               See 1442
PB92-963339/CDH
  Risk  Assessment  Guidance  for  Superfund.
  Volume 1. Human Health Evaluation Manual
  (Part'B).	
  PB92-963339/CDH               See 1067
PB92-963340/CDH
  Risk  Assessment  Guidance  for  Superfund.
  Volume 1. Human Health Evaluation Manual
  (PartC).
  PB92-963340/CDH               See 1069
PB92-963341/CDH
  Community Relations in  Superfund:  A Hand-
  book.
  PB92-963341 /CDH               See 0467
PB92-963342/CDH
  Accessing the $50 Million Set-Aside in the Re-
  medial Action Budget for Quick Response at
  National Priorities List Sites.
  PB92-963342/CDH               See 1082
PB92-963343/CDH
  Authorization for  Regional Administrators to
  Approve  Consistency  Exemptions  at NPL
  Sites.
  PB92-963343/CDH               See 0998
PB92-963344/CDH
  Update No. 2 to  'Procedures for Completion
  and Deletion of NPL Sites'.
  PB92-963344/CDH               See 0395
PB92-963346/CDH
  Evaluation of Ground-Water Extraction Reme-
  dies:  Phase 2.  Volume  1. Summary Report.
  PB92-963346/CDH               See 1444
PB92-963347/CDH
  Evaluation of Ground-Water Extraction Reme-
  dies:  Phase 2.  Volume 2. Case Studies and
  Updates.
  PB92-963347/CDH               See 1445
PB92-963348/CDH
  OPA Q's and A's: Overview of the Oil Pollution
  Act of 1990.
  PB92-963348/CDH               See 0933
PB92-963349/CDH
  pREscore Software. Users Manual and Tutori-
  al. Version 1.0.
  PB92-963349/CDH               See 0374
PB92-963350/CDH
  Presentations EPA-State  Soil Standards Con-
  ference. Held in Crystal City, Virginia on Janu-
  ary 29, 1991.
  PB92-963350/CDH               See 1524
PB92-963351/CDH
  Summary of Treatment Technology  Effective-
  ness for Contaminated Soil.
  PB92-963351/CDH               See 1533
PB92-963352/CDH
  Regional  Quality  Control Guidance  for  NPL
  Candidate Sites.
  PB92-963352/CDH               See 0376
PB92-963353/CDH
  Guide to Management of Investigation-Derived
  Wastes.
  PB92-963353/CDH               See 0345
PB92-963354/CDH
  Characterization Protocol for Radioactive Con-
  taminated Soils.
  PB92-963354/CDH               See 1494
PB92-963356/CDH
  Guidance for Data Useability in Risk Assess-
  ment (Part A).
  PB92-963356/CDH               See 1033
N|J-54
   I''

-------
                                                       NUMBER INDEX
                                                                                                               PB92-963621/CDH
 PB92-963358/CDH
  Considerations in Ground-Water Remediation
  at  Superfund  Sites  and  RCRA  Facilities:
  Update.
  PB92-963358/CDH               See 1437
 PB92-963359/CDH
  ROD Annual Report, FY1991. Volume 1.
  PB92-963359/CDH               See 1113
 PB92-963360/CDH
  ROD Annual Report, FY1991. Volume 2.
  PB92-963360/CDH               See 1114
 PB92-963361/CDH
  Superfund Accelerated Cleanup Bulletin:  Pre-
  sumptive Remedies for Wood Treatment Facili-
  ties. Volume 1, Number 2, May 1992.
  PB92-963361 /CDH               See 0116
 PB92-963362/CDH
  Guidance for  Data Useability in Risk Assess-
  ment (Part B).
  PB92-963362/CDH               See 1034
 PB92-963363/CDH
  Guidance for Data Useability in Risk Assess-
  ment.
  PB92-963363/CDH               See 1031
 PB92-963364/CDH
  Remedial Action Report: Documentation  for
  Operable Unit Completion.
  PB92-963364/CDH               See 1134
 PB92-963367/CDH
  Superfund   Accelerated   Cleanup  Bulletin.
  Volume  1, Number 1. Presumptive Remedies
  for Municipal Landfill Sites.
  PB92-963367/CDH               See 0117
 PB92-963368/CDH
  FY 1992 Themes for Regional Coordination to
  Support Continuous Improvements of Super-
  fund's Remedial Program.
  PB92-963368/CDH               See 1091
 PB92-963369/CDH
  ECO Update. Volume 1,  Number 3. The Role
  of Natural Resource Trustees in the Superfund
  Process.
  PB92-963369/CDH               See 1021
 PB92-963370/CDH
  ECO Update. Volume 1, Number 4. Developing
  a Work Scope  for Ecological Assessments.
  PB92-963370/CDH               See 1022
 PB92-963371/CDH
  Superfund   Accelerated   Cleanup  Bulletin.
  Volume  1,  Number 3. Presumptive Remedies.
  PB92-963371 /CDH               See 0118
 PB92-963372/CDH
  Understanding  Superfund  Risk Assessment.
  PB92-963372/CDH               See 0508
 PB92-963373/CDH
  Supplemental Guidance to RAGS: Calculating
  the Concentration Term. Volume 1, Number 1,
  May 1992.
  PB92-963373/CDH               See 1079
PB92-963374/CDH
  ECO Update.  Volume 1,  Number  5, August
  1992. Briefing  the BTAG: Initial Description of
  Setting, History, and Ecology of a Site.
  PB92-963374/CDH               See 1023
PB92-963375/CDH
  Guidance  for   Performing   Site  Inspections
  under CERCLA.
  PB92-963375/CDH               See 0343
PB92-963377/CDH
  Hazard Ranking System Guidance Manual.
  PB92-963377/CDH               See 0346
 PB92-963401/CDH
  Superfund Removal Procedures: Guidance on
  the Consideration of ARARS during Removal
  Actions.
  PB92-963401/CDH               See 1013
 PB92-963403/CDH
  Superfund Emergency  Response  Actions:  A
  Summary of Federally-Funded Removals.  Fifth
  Annual Report - Fiscal Year 1990.
  PB92-963403/CDH               See 0313
 PB92-963405/CDH
  Compendium of ERT Field Analytical Proce-
  dures.
  PB92-963405/CDH               See 0902
 PB92-963406/CDH
  Compendium of ERT Air Sampling Procedures.
  PB92-963406/CDH               See 0901
 PB92-963407/CDH
  Technical Assistance Team (TAT) Contracts
  Users' Manual.
  PB92-963407/CDH               See 0075
 PB92-963408/CDH
  Removal  Program  Representative Sampling
  Guidance. Volume 1. Soil.
  PB92-963408/CDH               See 1010
 PB92-963409/CDH
  Superfund Removal  Procedures: Removal En-
  forcement Guidance for On-Scene Coordina-
  tors.
  PB92-963409/CDH               See 1015
 PB92-963410/CDH
  Consideration of ARARs during Removal Ac-
  tions.
  PB92-963410/CDH               See 0419
 PB92-963411/CDH
  CERCLA  Notifications:  Emergency  Response
  Notification System (ERNS) Fact Sheet.
  PB92-963411 /CDH               See 0926
 PB92-963412/CDH
  Overview of ERNS: Emergency Response No-
  tification System  (ERNS) Fact Sheet.
  PB92-963412/CDH               See 0935
 PB92-963413/CDH
  Oil Notifications:  Emergency Response Notifi-
  cation System (ERNS) Fact Sheet.
  PB92-963413/CDH               See 0930
 PB92-963414/CDH
  Standard Operating Safety Guides.
  PB92-963414/CDH               See 0925
 PB92-963416/CDH
  Superfund Removal Procedures: Public Partici-
  pation Guidance for On-Scene Coordinators:
  Community Relations and the Administrative
  Record.
  PB92-963416/CDH               See 1014
 PB92-963418/CDH
  Analysis of  State Superfund  Programs:  50-
  State Study. 1991 Update.
  PB92-963418/CDH               See 0449
 PB92-963419/CDH
  Guide to Removal Enforcement.
  PB92-963419/CDH               See 1006
 PB92-963420/CDH
  OPA Update: Implementation of the Oil Pollu-
  tion Act of 1990. Volume 2, Number 1.
  PB92-963420/CDH               See 0934
PB92-963421/CDH
  Superfund Emergency Response Actions: A
  Summary of Federally-Funded Removals. Sixth
  Annual Report, Fiscal Year 1991.
  PB92-963421/CDH               See 0315
 PB92-963422/CDH
  Notification  Requirements for Continuous Re-
  leases of Hazardous Substances.
  PB92-963422/CDH               See 1148
 PB92-963602/CDH
  Limiting  Lead  Transfers to Private  Parties
  during Discrete Phases of the Remedial Proc-
  ess.
  PB92-963602/CDH               See 0571
 PB92-963603/CDH
  Overview of the Off-Site  Policy for OSCs and
  RPMs.
  PB92-963603/CDH               See 0433
 PB92-963606/CDH
  Guidance on Preparing Waste-in Lists and Vol-
  umetric  Rankings for Release  to Potentially
  Responsible Parties (PRPs) under CERCLA.
  PB92-963606/CDH               See 0554
 PB92-963607/CDH
  Methodology for Early De Minimis Waste Con-
  tributor Settlements  under CERCLA  Section
  122(g) (1) (A).
  PB92-963607/CDH               See 0573
 PB92-963608/CDH
  Accelerating Potentially Responsible Party Re-
  medial Design Starts: Implementing the 30-Day
  Study.
  PB92-963608/CDH               See 0509
 PB92-963609/CDH
  Interim Cashout Settlement Procedures.
  PB92-963609/CDH               See 0558
 PB92-963610/CDH
  Guidance  on   Procedures   for  Submitting
  CERCLA Section 106(b)  Reimbursement Peti-
  tions and on EPA Review of Those Petitions.
  PB92-963610/CDH               See 0555
 PB92-963611/CDH
  Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Cleanup
  Efforts Nationwide (White  Chemical).
  PB92-963611/CDH               See 0971
 PB92-963612/CDH
  Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Cleanup
  Efforts Nationwide (Bog Creek Farm).
  PB92-963612/CDH               See 0940
 PB92-963615/CDH
  Policy Towards Owners of Residential Property
  at Superfund Sites.
  PB92-963615/CDH               See 0587
 PB92-963617/CDH
  Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Cleanup
  Efforts Nationwide, Fail 1992. (Celanese Cor-
  poration Site Profile).
  PB92-963617/CDH               See 0943
 PB92-963618/CDH
  Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Cleanup
  Efforts Nationwide, Fall 1992.  (Valley  of the
  Drums, Bullitt County, Kentucky).
  PB92-963618/CDH               See 0947
PB92-963619/CDH
  Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Cleanup
  Efforts Nationwide (City Industries).
  PB92-963619/CDH               See 0941
PB92-963620/CDH
  Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Cleanup
  Efforts Nationwide (McKin Company).
  PB92-963620/CDH               See 0953
PB92-963621/CDH
  Superfund Information Repositories and  Ad-
  ministrative  Records: Introduction for  Librar-
  ians.
  PB92-963621/CDH               See 0497
                                                                                                                        NU-55

-------
                                                                                                  ! inn*fit1:	i	:wmm'',	;>
 PB92-963622/CDH
           NUMBER INDEX
PS92r9fi3622/CDH
  Suporfund Information  Repositories and Ad-
  ministrative Records,
  PB92-963622/CDH                See 0884
  CERCLA  Enforcement  Policy  Compendium
  Update,
  PBS2-963623/CDH                See 0516
P892-963625/CDH
  Soporiund at Work: Hazardous Waste Cleanup
  Efforts Nationwide, Fall 1992. (Unsdowne Ra-
  dioactive Residence Site Profile).
  P892.963625/CDH                See 0946
PB92-963827/CDH
  Suporfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Cleanup
  Efforts Nationwide. Fall 1992. (American Ther-
  mostat Corporation, New York).
  P892-963627/CDH                See 0942
PB92:9f 3«28/<;DH [[[ ...................... .....
  Suporfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Cleanup
  Efforts Nationwide,  Fall 1992.  (Wide  Beach
  Section ofBfintTNew York).
  PS92-963628/CDH                See 0948
P892;963629/CpH ........................... ................................
  Soporfund at Work: ..... Hazardous Waste Cleanup ''
  Efforts  Nationwide,  Fall  1992.  (Krysowaty
  Farm, Hillsborough, New Jersey).
  PS92-963629/COH                See 0945
PBB2-M3630/CDH
  Suporfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Cleanup
  Efforts Nationwide, Fall 1992. (Ciba-Geigy Cor-
  poration, Mclntosh, Alabama).
  P892 963630/COH                See 0944
PB93-100113/CDH
  AutoMOUSE: An Improvement to the MOUSE
  Computerized  Uncertainty  Analysis  System
  Operational Manual.
  P893-100113/CDH                See 1201
                       ~     '      ' '"''
                                      ..
  Demonstration  of  a Trial Excavation at the
  MoCpfl Suporfund Site,
  p93^6oi2t/CPHl ..... ."I   ' ;     See 1226
PBttMOOeWCDH.
  Evaluatipn lpfll"l"tenr§§tria'l \ Indicators, for ..... Use' in
  Ecological Assessments at  Hazardous Waste
  PB93-100865/COH                See 1249
 PB93-101152/CDH
  Carver-GreenfieldProcess (trade Name) De-
  %dro«Tach Corporation. Applications Analysis
  Report.
  P893.101152/CDH                See 1207
 PB93-105575/CDH
  Engineering Bulletin: Slurry Walls.
  P893-105575/CDH                See 1235
 PB93-105583/CDH
  Engineering Bulletin: Pyrolysis Treatment
  W93-10S583/COH                See 1234
 PB93-105591/CDH
  Enginooring Bulletin: Technology Preselection
  beta Requirements,
,. ei;93;10lSS9i1/CDH	See 1405
 PB93-105617/CDH
  Literature  Survey of Innovative Technologies
     Hazardous Waste Site Remediation, 1987-
  1991
      '™'  "~' '   "   See 128J

  Technical  Guidance  Document: Construction
  Quality Management for Remedial Action and
  Remedial Design Waste Containment Systems.
  PB83-105625/CDH                See 1334
PB93-106763/CDH
  Asymmetric Loss Function for Superfund Re-
  mediation Decisions.
  PB93-106763/CDH                See 1200
PB93-108322/CDH
  PA-Score  (Preliminary  Assessment  Score)
  User's Manual and Tutorial. Version 2.1.
  PB93-108322/CDH                See 0367
PB93-115160/CDH
  Technology  Evaluation  Report  of Reteoh's
  Plasma Centrifugal Furnace. Volume 1.
  PB93-115160/CDH                See 1342
PB93-115178/CDH
  Technology  Evaluation  Report  of Retech's
  Plasma Centrifugal Furnace. Volume 2.
  PB93-115178/CDH                See 1343
PB93-116069/CDH
  Compendium of Federal Rnancial  Assistance
	 Programs: Targeting  Programs for State and
  Local Ground-Water Protection.
  PB93-116069/CDH                See 1435
PB93-121051/CDH
  Evaluation of Commercially-Available Portable
 , Gas Chromatographs.
  PB93-121051/CDH                See 1478
PB93-121325/CDH
  Guide  for  Conducting Treatability  Studies
  under CERCLA: Thermal  Desorption  Quick
  Reference Fact Sheet.
  PB93-121325/CDH                See 1169
PB93-121333/CDH
  Selection of Control Technologies for Remedi-
  ation  of Lead Battery Recycling Sites. (Engi-
  neering Bulletin).
  PB93-121333/CDH                See 1298
PB93-121341/CDH
  Superfund Engineering Issue: Considerations
  for Evaluating the Impact of Metals  Partitioning
, during the Incineration of Contaminated Soils
  from Superfund Sites.
  PB93-121341/CPH                See 1534
PB93-122257/CDH
„ Assessing Potential Indoor Air Impacts for Su-
  perfund Sites. Air/Superfund  National  Techni-
  cal Guidance Study Series.
  PB93-122257/CDH                See 1395
PB93-126175/CDH
  Bioremediation: An Information Update on Ap-
  plying Bioremediation to Site Cleanup.
  PB93-126175/CDH                See 1421
PB93-126597/CDH
  Guide  for  Conducting Treatability  Studies
  under CERCLA: Thermal  Desorption Remedy
  Selection. Interim Guidance.
  PB93-126597/CDH                See 1170
PB93-126613/CDH
  Superfund Innovative Technology  Evaluation
  Program:   Progress   and   Accomplishments
  Rscal Year 1991. A  5th Report to Congress.
  PB93-126613/CDH                See 1313
PB93-126787/CDH
  Guide  for  Conducting Treatability  Studies
  under CERCLA.
  PB93-126787/CDH
                                  See 1155
PB93-131431/CDH
  SITE-Ernerging Technologies: Laser Induced
  Photochemical Oxidative Destruction of Toxic
  Organics in Leachates and Groundwaters.
  PB93-131431/CDH                See 1591
PB93-131787/CDH
  Chemical Stabilization of Mixed Organic  and
  Metal Compounds. EPA SITE Program Demon-
   stration of the Silicate Technology Corporation
   Process.
   PB93-131787/CDH               See 1212
	PB93-131795/CDH	'	
   Solvent Extraction Processes: A  Survey  of
   Systems in the SITE Program.
   PB93-131795/CDH               See 1305
 PB93-133387/CDH
   Innovative  Treatment Technologies:  Semi-
   Annual Status Report (Fourth Edition).
   PB93-133387/CDH               See 1273
 PB93-134187/CDH
   Site Enforcement Tracking  System (SETS):
   PRP National Listing  Alphabetically  by  Party
   Name.
   PB93-134187/CDH               See 0829
 PB93-134195/CDH
   Site Enforcement Tracking  System (SETS):
   PRP National Listing by Site.
   PB93-134195/CDH               See 0835
 PB93-134203/CDH
   Site Enforcement Tracking  System (SETS):
   PRP Listing by Site for Region  1. Volume 1.
   PB93-134203/CDH               See 0742
 PB93-134211/CDH
   Site Enforcement Tracking  System (SETS):
   PRP Listing by Site for Region  2. Volume 2.
   PB93-134211 /CDH               See 0747
 PB93-134229/CDH
   Site Enforcement Tracking  System (SETS):
   PRP Listing by Site for Region  3. Volume 3.
   PB93-134229/CDH               See 0751
 PB93-134237/CDH
   Site Enforcement Tracking  System (SETS):
   PRP Listing by Site for Region  4. Volume 4.
   PB93-134237/CDH               See 0756
 PB93-134245/CDH
   Site Enforcement Tracking  System (SETS):
   PRP Listing by Site for Region  5. Volume 5.
   PB93-134245/CDH               See 0761
 PB93-134252/CDH
   Site Enforcement Tracking  System (SETS):
   PRP Listing by Site for Region  6. Volume 6.
   PB93-134252/CDH               See 0766
 PB93-134260/CDH
   Site Enforcement Tracking  System (SETS):
   PRP Listing by Site for Region  7. Volume 7.
   PB93-134260/CDH               See 0771
 PB93-134278/CDH
   Site Enforcement Tracking  System (SETS):
   PRP Listing by Site for Region  8. Volume 8.
   PB93-134278/CDH               See 0776
 PB93-134286/CDH
   Site Enforcement Tracking  System (SETS):
   PRP Listing by Site for Region  9. Volume 9.
   PB93-134286/CDH               See 0781
 PB93-134294/CDH
   Site Enforcement Tracking  System (SETS):
   PRP Listing by Site for Region 10. Volume 10.
   PB93-134294/CDH               See 0786
 PB93-138154/CDH
   Air/Superfund  National Technical  Guidance
   Study Series: Applicability of Open Path Moni-
   tors for Superfund.
   PB93-138154/CDH               See 1375
 PB93-140762/CDH
   Cleaning Up the Nation's Waste Sites: Markets

-------
                                                        NUMBER INDEX
                                                                                                                 PB93-194025/CDH
 PB93-141034/CDH
   Pilot-Scale   Incineration   of   Contaminated
   Sludges from the Bofors-Nobel Superfund Site.
   PB93-141034/CDH               See 1289
 PB93-141109/CDH
   Small Systems Meet Superfund Challenge with
   Point-of-Entry Treatment Units.
   PB93-141109/CDH               See 1304
 PB93-143980/CDH
   OSWER Source Book. Volume 1. Training and
   Technology Transfer Resources, 1992-1993
   PB93-143980/CDH               See 1284
 PB93-144111/CDH
   Synopses of  Federal Demonstrations of Inno-
   vative Site Remediation Technologies.
   PB93-144111 /CDH               See 1324
 PB93-144129/CDH
   OSWER Source Book. Volume 2. Training and
   Technology Transfer Resources,  1992-1993
   PB93-144129/CDH               See 1285
 PB93-145621/CDH
   Babcock and Wilcox Cyclone Furnace Vitrifica-
   tion. Technology Demonstration Summary.
   PB93-145621/CDH               See 1203
 PB93-145639/CDH
   Horsehead Resource Development Company,
   Inc., Flame Reactor Technology. Technology
   Demonstration Summary.
   PB93-145639/CDH               See 1264
 PB93-145647/CDH
   Accessing Federal Data Bases for Contaminat-
   ed  Site Clean-Up  Technologies  (Second  Edi-
   tion).
   PB93-145647/CDH               See 1189
 PB93-149227/CDH
   Potential for Joint Research between EPA and
   the U.S. Army.
   PB93-149227/CDH               See 1293
 PB93-150142/CDH
   Extraction and Recovery of Lead Species from
   Soil.
   PB93-150142/CDH               See 1506
 PB93-150159/CDH
   Control  Technology:  1992 Update  of U.S.
   EPA's Superfund Innovative Technology Eval-
   uation (SITE)  Emerging Technology Program.
   PB93-150159/CDH               See 1223
 PB93-155968/CDH
  Pilot-Scale Incineration of Contaminated Soil
  from the Chemical  Insecticide Corporation Su-
  perfund Site.
  PB93-155968/CDH                See 1523
 PB93-157626/CDH
  Tech Trends (Number 11).
  PB93-157626/CDH                See 1331
 PB93-159572/CDH
  Inside the Hotline: A Compilation of 1992
  Monthly  Hotline Reports.
  PB93-159572/CDH               See 0141
PB93-163004/CDH
  Pilot-Scale  Incineration of  Comtaminated Soils
  from the Drake Chemical Superfund Site.
  PB93-163004/CDH               See 1522
PB93-163038/CDH
  SITE Emerging Technologies Project: Babcock
  and Wilcox Cyclone Vitrification.
  PB93-163038/CDH               See 1303
PB93-163046/CDH
  Engineering Bulletin: Air Pathway Analysis.
  PB93-163046/CDH                See 1404
 PB93-163053/CDH
   Superfund  Innovative  Technology  Evaluation
   Program: Technology Profiles, Fifth Edition.
   PB93-163053/CDH               See 1315
 PB93-168805/CDH
   Estimation of the Cost of Using Chemical Pro-
   tective Clothing.
   PB93-168805/CDH               See 1244
 PB93-168813/CDH
   Evaluation of Portable Gas Chromatographs.
   PB93-168813/CDH               See 1479
 PB93-168821/CDH
   Measurement of Volatile  Organic Compounds
   during Start-Up of Bioremediation  of French
   Limited Superfund Site in Crosby Texas Using
   Wind Dependent Whole-Air Sampling.
   PB93-168821/CDH               See 1414
 PB93-169126/CDH
   Contingency Analysis Modeling for  Superfund
   Sites and Other Sources.
   PB93-169126/CDH               See 1219
 PB93-172948/CDH
   Applications Analysis Report: Silicate Technol-
   ogy  Corporation's  Solidification/Stabilization
   Technology for Organic  and Inorganic  Con-
   taminants in Soils.
   PB93-172948/CDH               See 1550
 PB93-173987/CDH
   Air/Superfund  National Technical  Guidance
   Study Series. Volume 1. Overview of Air Path-
   way Assessments for Superfund  Sites (Re-
   vised).
   PB93-173987/CDH               See 1391
 PB93-173995/CDH
   Air/Superfund  National Technical  Guidance
   Study  Series.  Air  Emissions  from   Area
   Sources: Estimating Soil and Soil-Gas Sample
   Number Requirements.
   PB93-173995/CDH               See 1373
 PB93-177129/CDH
   Site Enforcement  Tracking  System (SETS):
   PRP National Listing Alphabetically by Party
   Name.
   PB93-177129/CDH               See 0830
 PB93-177137/CDH
   Site Enforcement  Tracking  System (SETS):
   PRP National Listing by Site.
   PB93-177137/CDH               See 0836
 PB93-177145/CDH
   Site Enforcement  Tracking  System (SETS):
   PRP Listing by Site for Region 1.
   PB93-177145/CDH                See 0740
 PB93-177152/CDH
  Site Enforcement  Tracking  System (SETS):
  PRP Listing by Site for Region 2.
  PB93-177152/CDH                See 0745
 PB93-177160/CDH
  Site Enforcement  Tracking  System (SETS):
  PRP Listing by Site for Region 3.
  PB93-177160/CDH                See 0749
 PB93-177178/CDH
  Site  Enforcement  Tracking System (SETS):
  PRP Listing by Site for Region 4.
  PB93-177178/CDH                See 0754
PB93-177186/CDH
  Site  Enforcement  Tracking System (SETS):
  PRP Listing by Site  for Region 5.
  PB93-177186/CDH               See 0759
PB93-177194/CDH
  Site  Enforcement  Tracking System  (SETS):
  PRP Listing by Site  for Region 6.
  PB93-177194/CDH                See 0764
 PB93-177202/CDH
   Site  Enforcement  Tracking System  (SETS):
   PRP Listing by Site for Region 7.
   PB93-177202/CDH               See 0769
 PB93-177210/CDH
   Site  Enforcement  Tracking System  (SETS):
   PRP Listing by Site for Region 8.
   PB93-177210/CDH               See 0774
 PB93-177228/CDH
   Site  Enforcement  Tracking System  (SETS):
   PRP Listing by Site for Region 9.
   PB93-177228/CDH               See 0779
 PB93-177236/CDH
   Site  Enforcement  Tracking System  (SETS):
   PRP Listing by Site for Region 10.
   PB93-177236/CDH               See 0784
 PB93-178259/CDH
   On-Site  Engineering  Report of the  Slurry-
   Phase Biological Reactor for Pilot-Scale Test-
   ing on Contaminated Soil.
   PB93-178259/CDH               See 1520
 PB93-181220/CDH
   Commencement Bay Nearshore/Tideflats Fea-
   sibility Study. Executive Summary.
   PB93-181220/CDH               See 1579
 PB93-181238/CDH
   Commencement Bay Nearshore/Tideflats Fea-
   sibility Study. Volume 1.
   PB93-181238/CDH               See 1580
 PB93-181246/CDH
   Commencement Bay Nearshore/Tideflats Fea-
   sibility Study. Volume 2. Appendices.
   PB93-181246/CDH               See 1581
 PB93-181253/CDH
   Commencement Bay Nearshore/Tideflats Fea-
   sibility Study. Development of Sediment Clean-
   up Goals.
   PB93-181253/CDH                See 1578
 PB93-183333/CDH
   Computer Models  Used to Support Cleanup
   Decision-Making at Hazardous and Radioactive
   Waste Sites.
   PB93-183333/CDH                See 1218
 PB93-185551/CDH
   Environmental  Characteristics of EPA, NRC,
   and DOE Sites Contaminated with Radioactive
   Substances.
   PB93-185551/CDH                See 1237
 PB93-186807/CDH
  Air/Superfund  National  Technical  Guidance
  Study Series. Models for Estimating Air Emis-
  sion  Rates from Superfund Remedial Actions.
   PB93-186807/CDH                See 1388
 PB93-192698/CDH
  PREscore Software: Users Manual and Tutorial
  Version 2.0.
  PB93-192698/CDH                See 0375
PB93-193720/CDH
  In  situ Treatment  of Contaminated Ground
  Water:  An Inventory of  Research and Field
  Demonstrations and Strategies for  Improving
  Ground Water Remediation Technologies.
  PB93-193720/CDH                 See 1466
PB93-193852/CDH
  CERCLA/Superfund Orientation Manual.
  PB93-193852/CDH                 See 0130
PB93-194025/CDH
  Cleanup Information Bulletin  Board System
  Users Guide.  (CLU-IN: Cleanup  Information
  Bulletin Board).
  PB93-194025/CDH                 See 1215
                                                                                                                          NU-57

-------
      PB93-199214/CDH
          NUMBER INDEX
      PB93-199214/CDH
'r _       Ai/Suporfund  National	Technical	Guidance
'":       Study' Series.' Volume 4. Guidance for" Ambient
        A* Monitoring at Superfund  Sites (Revised).
        PB93-199214/CDH               See 1393
;.:     PB|3-199222/CpH	
::'='       Alr/Suporfund  National  Technical Guidance
        Study  Series:  Compilation  of Information on
        Roai-Timo Air Monitoring for Use at Superfund
        Sites.
        P893-199222/CDH               See 1377
j;i     pB|3-2j>09i3/cpfj	
•I-       S^Supisrfuno1  National  Technical Guidance
        Study  Series:  Evaluation of Short-Term Air
        Action Levels for Superfund Sites.
        P893.2Q0913/CDH               See 1386
      PBl3-2b3156/Ct»H
        X-ray Fluorescence Survey of Lead Contami-
        nated Residential Soils in Leadville, Colorado:
        A Caso Study.
        P883-203156/CDH               See 1549
      PB9,3-203958/CPH
        Jfch, Trends (Number 10).
        Pfi93-203958/CDH               See 1330
               ig'durrent	Etectrocoagulatfcin for Su-
        porfund Stht Remediation.	
      PB93-2Q5532/CDH
        Tschnotogy  Evaluation  Report  Pilot-Scale
        Demonstration of a Slurry-Phase Biological Re-
        actor (of Creosote-Contaminated Soil. Volume

        p93-205532/COH               See 1542
      PB93-205862/CDH
        Abstract  Proceedings:  Superfund Technical
        Support Project General  Meeting.  Held in
        Aliens,"Georgia on December 3-6,1990.
        PB93-205862/COH               See 1187
      P^93-205870/CpH
        Understanding Bforemediation:  A  Guidebook
        fof Citizens.
        P893-205870/C0H               See 0507
      PB|3-2fl62Q9/CpH	
        Stiperfund': Ehvirbnmental'Progress.
        fB93-206209/CDH               See 0976
      Pli3:2lOl6l3,40l/C,pH	
        Bbremodiation in trie Field: Number i, Novem-
        bar,1i90.	
        p§93^266340/CblH	        See 1424
      PB93-206357/CDH
        Tsch Trends Number 3, December 1990.
        PB93-206357/CDH               See 1325
      PB93-206365/CDH
        Tsch Trends Number 4, March 1991.
        P883-206365/CDH               See 1326
        Tsch Trends Number 5, May 1991.
        P893-206373/CDH                See 1327
      PB93-206331/CDH
        Toch Trends Number 9, June 1992.
        1%93-206381/COH                See 1329
      PB93-207504/CDH
        Gfound-Water Modeling Compendium.  Model
        Foot Sheets,  Descriptions, Applications  and
        Assessment Framework.
        pS93.207S04/CpH                See 1458
      pgi3,2075S3/C0H	
            ria'ional  Eval'jaticn	of In-sttu  Biorestora-
        |Sn of' 'Coniaminated" Soil and Groundwater
        peptambor i99Q)-fransiation.
        PB93-2Q7S53/CDH                See 1517
PB93-209898/CDH
  Guidance for  Capacity Assurance  Planning.
  Capacity Planning Pursuant to CERCLA Sec-
  tion 104(c)(9).
  PB93-209898/CDH               See 0137
PB93-213528/CDH
  Technology  Evaluation  Report:  Perox-Pure
  (Trade Name) Chemical Oxidation Technology.
  PB93-213528/CDH               See 1345
PB93-215614/CDH
  Control of Air Emissions from  Superfund Sites.
  PB93-215614/CpH        	S,PS,I4,°P,	
PB93-215622/CDH	'
  Estimation of Air Impacts for Solidification and
  Stabilization Processes  Used  at  Superfund
  Sites. Air/Superfund National Technical Guid-
  ance Study Series.
  PB93-215622/CDH               See 1408
PB93-215630/CDH
  Estimation of Air Impacts for Thermal Desorp-
  tion Units Used at Superfund  Sites. Air/Super-
  fund  National   Technical  Guidance  Study
  Series.
  PB93-215630/CDH               See 1409
PB93-215648/CDH
  Air/Superfund  National  Technical  Guidance
  Study  Series: Estimation of Air Impacts from
  Area Sources of Particulate Matter Emissions
  at Superfund Sites.
  PB93-215648/CDH               See 1385
PB93-215655/CDH
  Estimation of Air Impacts for Bioventing Sys-
  tems Used at  Superfund Sites. Air/Superfund
  National Technical Guidance Study Series.
  PB93-215655/CDH               See 1407
PB93-216067/CDH
  Technology  Evaluation Report Toronto  Har-
  bour Commissioners (THC) Soil Recycle Treat-
  ment Train.
  PB93-216067/CDH               See 1543
PB93-216596/CDH
  Technology  Evaluation Report: Site  Program
  Demonstration  Test.   Accutech   Pneumatic
  Fracturing Extraction and Hot  Gas Injection,
  Phase 1. Volume 1.
  PB93-216596/CDH                See 1352
PB93-217651/CDH
  Risk Reduction  Engineering  Laboratory Site
  Remediation Technical Support Program: FY92
  Annual Report.
  PB93-217651/CDH                See 1296
PB93-218337/CDH
  Superfund  Innovative  Technology Evaluation
  (SITE)  Program  Evaluation Report for Antox
  BTX Water Screen (BTX Immunoassay).
  PB93-218337/CDH                See 1320
PB93-222107/CDH
  Acid Volatile Sulfide Predicts the Acute Toxici-
  ty of Cadmium and Nickel in Sediments.
  PB93-222107/CDH                See 1572
PB93-222875/CDH
  Removal of Radionuclides by Electrokinetic
  Soil Processing.
  PB93-222875/CDH                See 1531
PB93-223196/CDH
  Tech Trends: The Applied Technologies Jour-
  nal for  Superfund Removals and Remedial Ac-
  tions and RCRA Corrective Actions. May 1993.
  PB93-223196/CDH                See 1333
PB93-226751/CDH
  Comparison of a Revised Area Source Algo-
  rithm for the Industrial Source Complex Short
  Term Model and Wind Tunnel Data.
  PB93-226751/CDH                See 1216
 PB93-227122/CDH	
   Technology Evaluation Report. SITE Program
   Demonstration, Resources Conservation Com-
   pany,  Basic  Extractive  Sludge  Treatment
   (B.E.S.T. (Trade Name)), Grand Calumet River,
   Gary, Indiana. Volume 1.
   PB93-227122/CDH               See 1593

 PB93-227130/CDH
   Technology Evaluation Report. SITE Program
   Demonstration, Resources Conservation Com-
   pany,  Basic  Extractive  Sludge  Treatment
	 (B.E.S.T. (Trade Name)), Grand Calumet River,
   Gary, Indiana. Volume 2. Part 1.
   PB93-227130/CDH               See 1594

 PB93-227148/CDH
   Technology Evaluation Report. SITE Program
   Demonstration, Resources Conservation Com-
   pany,  Basic  Extractive  Sludge  Treatment
   (B.E.S.T. (Trade Name)), Grant Calumet River,
   Gary, Indiana. Volume 2. Part 2.
   PB93-227148/CDH               See 1595

 PB93-227i55/CDH
   Technology Evaluation Report. SITE Program
   Demonstration, Resources Conservation Com-
   pany,  Basic  Extractive  Sludge  Treatment
   (B.E.S.T. (Trade Name)), Grand Calumet River,
   Gary, Indiana. Volume 2. Part 3.
   PB93-227155/CDH               See 1596
 PB93-227205/CDH
   Site Emerging Technologies: Bioscrubber for
   Removing Hazardous Organic Emissions from
   Soil, Water and Air Decontamination Process-
   es.
   PB93-227205/CDH               See 1302
 PB93-228567/CDH
   SITE  Program Demonstration  of the  SBP
   Technologies,   Inc.,  Membrane  Filtration
   System on Creosote-Contaminated Water.
   PB93-228567/CDH               See 1592
 PB93-229755/CDH
   Field Applications of Robotic Systems  in Haz-
   ardous Environments,  p1-29  1993. See also
   PB86-176344 and PB92-166743.
   PB93-229755/CDH               See 1251
 PB93-230027/CDH
   Methodology for Evaluating Potential Carcino-
   genicity in Support of Reportable Quantity Ad-
   justments Pursuant to CERCLA  Section 102.
   PB93-230027/CDH               See 1146
 PB93-231165/CDH
   Emerging Technology Report:  Metals Treat-
   ment at Superfund Sites by Absorptive Filtra-
   tion.
   PB93-231165/CDH               See 1232
 PB93-232684/CDH
   Forum Focus, August 1993.
   PB93-232684/CDH               See 0136
 PB93-233914/CDH
   Handbook for Constructed Wetlands Receiving
   Acid Mine Drainage.
   PB93-233914/CDH               See 1588
 PB93-234565/CDH
   In situ Bioremediation  of  Contaminated  Un-
   saturated Subsurface Soils,
   PB93-23^565/CDH               See 1509
 PB93-2365GO/CDH
   Foam Scrubbing (Chapter 9).
   PB93-23'6560/CDH
See 1411
      NU-58

-------
                                                        NUMBER INDEX
                                                                     PB93-963235/CDH
PB93-237535/CDH
  Technical  Resource  Document: Solidification/
  Stabilization and Its Application to Waste Ma-
  terials.
  PB93-237535/CDH               See 1565
PB93-500270/CDH
  Organic   Contract  Compliance   Screening
  System (OCCSS) Software (OLM01.8 Version
  3) (for Microcomputers).
  PB93-500270/CDH               See 0050
PB93-500288/CDH
  Inorganic  Contract   Compliance   Screening
  System (ICCSS) Software (ILM02.1 Version 2)
  (for Microcomputers).
  PB93-500288/CDH               See 0036
PB93-500346/CDH
  PA-Score  (Preliminary  Assessment  Score),
  Version 2.1, 5  1/4 inch (for Microcomputers).
  PB93-500346/CDH               See 0370
PB93-500353/CDH
  PA-Score  (Preliminary  Assessment  Score),
  Version 2.1, 3  1/2 inch (for Microcomputers).
  PB93-500353/CDH               See 0369
PB93-505345/CDH
  Organic   Contract  Compliance   Screening
  System (OCCSS) Software (OLM01.8 Version
  4) (for Microcomputers).
  PB93-505345/CDH               See 0051
PB93-505352/CDH
  Inorganic  Contract   Compliance   Screening
  System (ICCSS) Software (ILM02.1 Version 3)
  (for Microcomputers).
  PB93-505352/CDH               See 0037
PB93-505915/CDH
  Preliminary Ranking Evaluation Score (PREs-
  core) Version 2.0 (for Microcomputers).
  PB93-505915/CDH               See 0373
PB93-506053/CDH
  Organic   Contract  Compliance   Screening
  System (OCCSS) Software  (OLM01.8 Version
  5) (for Microcomputers).
  PB93-506053/CDH                See 0052
PB93-506111/CDH
  Site Assessment Information Directory (SAID)
  Region 1 (for Microcomputers).  Date of Cover-
  age: October 1991.
  PB93-506111/CDH                See 0382
PB93-506129/CDH
  Site Assessment Information Directory (SAID)
  Region 2 (for Microcomputers).  Date of Cover-
  age: October 1991.
  PB93-506129/CDH                See 0383
PB93-506137/CDH
  Site Assessment Information Directory (SAID)
  Region 3 (for Microcomputers).  Date of Cover-
  age: October 1991.
  PB93-506137/CDH                See 0384
PB93-506145/CDH
  Site Assessment Information Directory (SAID)
  Region 4 (for Microcomputers).  Date of Cover-
  age: October 1991.
  PB93-506145/CDH                See 0385
PB93-506152/CDH
  Site Assessment Information Directory (SAID)
  Region 5 (for Microcomputers).  Date of Cover-
  age: 1991.
  PB93-506152/CDH                See 0386
PB93-506160/CDH
  Site Assessment Information Directory (SAID)
  Region 6 (for Microcomputers).  Date of Cover-
  age: October 1991.
  PB93-506160/CDH                See 0387
 PB93-506178/CDH
  Site Assessment Information Directory (SAID)
  Region 7 (for Microcomputers). Date of Cover-
  age: October 1991.
  PB93-506178/CDH               See 0388
 PB93-506186/CDH
  Site Assessment Information Directory (SAID)
  Region 8 (for Microcomputers). Date of Cover-
  age: 1991.
  PB93-506186/CDH               See 0389
 PB93-506194/CDH
  Site Assessment Information Directory (SAID)
  Region 9 (for Microcomputers). Date of Cover-
  age: October 1991.
  PB93-506194/CDH               See 0390
 PB93-506202/CDH
  Site Assessment Information Directory (SAID)
  Region 10 (for Microcomputers). Date of Cov-
  erage: October 1991.
  PB93-506202/CDH               See 0391
 PB93-921100/CDH
  Health  Effects  Assessment Summary Tables.
  PB93-921100/CDH               See 1052
 PB93-963201
  National Priorities List Sites: Alabama, 1992.
  PB93-963201                    See 0150
 PB93-963202/CDH
  National Priorities List Sites: Alaska,  1992.
  PB93-963202/CDH               See 0153
 PB93-963203/CDH
  National Priorities List Sites: The United States
  Territories, 1992.
  PB93-963203/CDH               See 0275
 PB93-963204/CDH
  National  Priorities  List  Sites:  Arizona  and
  Nevada, 1992.
  PB93-963204/CDH               See 0158
 PB93-963205/CDH
  National Priorities List Sites: Arkansas, 1992.
  PB93-963205/CDH               See 0161
 PB93-963206/CDH
  National Priorities List  Sites:  California  and
  Hawaii, 1992.
  PB93-963206/CDH               See 0164
 PB93-963207/CDH
  National Priorities List Sites: Colorado, 1992.
  PB93-963207/CDH               See 0167
 PB93-963208/CDH
  National  Priorities  List  Sites: Connecticut,
  1992.
  PB93-963208/CDH               See 0170
PB93-963209/CDH
  National Priorities List Sites:  Delaware, 1992.
  PB93-963209/CDH               See 0173
PB93-963210/CDH
  National Priorities List Sites: Florida,  1992.
  PB93-963210/CDH               See 0176
PB93-963211/CDH
  National Priorities List Sites: Georgia, 1992.
  PB93-963211 /CDH               See 0179
PB93-963212/CDH
  National Priorities List Sites:'Idaho, 1992.
  PB93-963212/CDH                See 0183
PB93-963213/CDH
  National Priorities List Sites: Illinois, 1992.
  PB93-963213/CDH                See 0186
PB93-963214/CDH
  National Priorities List Sites: Indiana,  1992.
  PB93-963214/CDH                See 0189
PB93-963215/CDH
  National Priorities List Sites: Iowa, 1992.
  PB93-963215/CDH               See 0192
PB93-963216/CDH
  National Priorities List Sites: Kansas, 1992.
  PB93-963216/CDH               See 0195
PB93-963217/CDH
  National Priorities List  Sites: Kentucky, 1992.
  PB93-963217/CDH               See 0198
PB93-963218/CDH
  National Priorities List  Sites: Louisiana, 1992.
  PB93-963218/CDH               See 0201
PB93-963219/CDH
  National Priorities List Sites: Maine, 1992.
  PB93-963219/CDH               See 0204
PB93-963220/CDH
  National Priorities List  Sites: Maryland, 1992.
  PB93-963220/CDH               See 0207
PB93-963221/CDH
  National Priorities List Sites: Massachusetts,
  1992.
  PB93-963221/CDH               See 0210
PB93-963222/CDH
  National Priorities List  Sites: Michigan, 1992.
  PB93-963222/CDH               See 0213
PB93-963223/CDH
  National Priorities List Sites: Minnesota, 1992.
  PB93-963223/CDH               See 0216
PB93-963224/CDH
  National Priorities List Sites: Mississippi, 1992.
  PB93-963224/CDH               See 0219
PB93-963225/CDH
  National Priorities List  Sites: Missouri, 1992.
  PB93-963225/CDH               See 0222
PB93-963226/CDH
  National Priorities  List  Sites: Montana, 1992.
  PB93-963226/CDH               See 0225
PB93-963227/CDH
  National Priorities  List Sites: Nebraska, 1992.
  PB93-963227/CDH               See 0228
PB93-963228/CDH
  National Priorities  List Sites: New Hampshire,
  1992.
  PB93-963228/CDH               See 0231
PB93-963229/CDH
  National Priorities List Sites: New Jersey, 1992.
  PB93-963229/CDH               See 0234
PB93-963230/CDH
  National Priorities List  Sites:  New  Mexico,
  1992.
  PB93-963230/CDH               See 0237
PB93-963231/CDH
  National Priorities List Sites: New York, 1992.
  PB93-963231/CDH                See 0240
PB93-963232/CDH
  National Priorities  List  Sites:  North Carolina,
  1992.
  PB93-963232/CDH                See 0245
PB93-963233/CDH
  National Priorities List Sites: North and South
  Dakota, 1992.
  PB93-963233/CDH                See 0242
PB93-963234/CDH
  National Priorities List Sites: Ohio, 1992.
  PB93-963234/CDH                See 0249
PB93-963235/CDH
  National Priorities List Sites: Oklahoma, 1992.
  PB93-963235/CDH                See 0252
                                                                                                                            NU-59

-------
I!!"HI1! ...... IWir
..... tW'Si ..... r.W. .....
            ..... !T']R ....... F"'>Tffri! ...... w ...... !!!!'«! ..... 'ITTOBf! ...... ITWBffl^
                                                                                                                              ........ I!"1" ....... IH
                                                                                                                                       II1. !!!	":l "  111111  '111;:!:1 , ».'  ,11 |
                                                                                                                                       ' •*":•!  'ill!:  if ,1:..
             PB93-963236/CDH
           NUMBER INDEX
             PB93-963236/CDH
               NaUonal Priorities Ust Sites: Oregon, 1992.
               PB93-963236/CDH               See 0255
             PB93-963237/CDH      ^   	'''\'[ IM™
               National  Priorities  Ust Sites:  Pennsylvania!
               1992.
               PB93.963237/CDH    	~|   '   „  §60,0258
             PB»3«963238/CDH
               National Priorities Ust Sites: Puerto Rico and
               Virgin Islands, 1992.
               PB93-963238/CDH               See 0261
             PB93-963239/CDH
               National  Priorities Ust Sites:  Rhode Island,
               1992.
               PB93-963239/CDH               See 0264
               National  Priorities ...... 'Ust Sites:' "South' Carolina,
               1392.
               PBS3-963240/GDH               See 0268
             PB93-963241/CDH
               National Priorities Ust Sites: Tennessee, 1992.
               PS83-963241/GDH               See 0271
             PB93-963242/CDH
               National Priorities Ust Sites: Texas, 1992.
               P883-963242/CDH               See 0274
             PB93-963243/CDH
               National Priorities Ust Sites: Utah, 1992.
               PB93-963243/COH               See 0278
             PB93-263244/CDH
               National  Priorities Ust Sites: Vermont, 1992.
                                   ,11,  ,   .' . See 0281
               National Priorities List Sites: Virginia, 1992.
               PB93-963245/CDH               See 0284
                .........
                                             ,,,
               __________  Priorities  Ust  Sites:  Washington,
               ilia, [[[
               P893-963246/GDH               See 0287
             PB93-963247/CDH
               National Priorities  Ust  Sites:  West Virginia,
               1982.
               PB93-963247/CDH               See 02|0
             PB93-963248/CDH
               National Priorities Ust Sites: Wisconsin,  1992.
               PB93-963248/CDH               See 0293
             , PB|3-96i324,9ffiaH [[[
               National Priorities Ust Sites: Wyoming,  1992.
               PB33-9e3249/CDH               See 0296
                             1'11           i     '   "'
               National Prioritios Ust Sites (1992).
               PB93-963250/COH               See 0297
             PB93-963251/CDH
               Mintor-Protega Program.
               PB93-963251/CDH               See 0044
                        on' mpementaon'of' the Superfund
               Aooetorated Cleanup  Model (SACM) under
               CIReLAandtheNCP.
               PB93.963252/COH               See 0094
               Ejtfrcjsing Rexibllity through the Superfund Ac-
               colorated Cleanup Model (SACM).
               PB93-963253/CDH               See 0091
             PB93-9632S4/CDH
               Sopflrfimd Progress: Fall/Winter 1992.
               P893-963254/CDH               See 0328
             PB93-963255/CDH
               Sugorfund   Progress.   Aficionado's  Version.
               Progress as of September 30, 1 992.
               PB93 963255/CDH               See 0327
 PB93-963258/CDH
   Required Contracts Management Training for
   Regional Superfund Personnel.
   PB93-963258/CDH               See 0065
"'p'B93"-963'25!9/CDH1'
   Overview of the Outyear Liability Model (OLM).
   PB93-963259/CDH               See 0106
 PB93-963261/CDH
   Highlights: Superfund Program Management.
   Fiscal Year 1993.
   PB93-963261/CDH               See 0095
 PB93-963262/CDH
   Status of Key SACM  Program  Management
   Issues: Interim Guidance, Volume 1, Number 1,
   December 1992.
   PB93;963262/CDH               See 0113
 PB93-963263/CDH	
   Early Action  and  Long-Term Action  under
   SACM: Interim Guidance, Volume 1, Number 2,
   December 1992.
   PB93-963263/CDH               See 0089
 PB93-963264/CDH
   Enforcement under SACM:  Interim Guidance.
   Volume 1, Numbers, December 1992.
   PB93-963264/CDH               See 0090
 PB93-963265/CDH
   Assessing Sites  under SACM: Interim Guid-
   ance. Volume 1, Number  4, Deccember 1992.
   PB93-963265/CDH               See 0084
 PB93-963266/CDH
   SACM Regional Decision Teams: Interim Guid-
   ance. Volume  1, Number 5, December 1992.
   PB93-963266/CDH               See 0111
 PB93-963267/CDH
 '"  Resources.jpf ^Preparing Independent Govern-
   rherit Estimates for Remedial Contracting Work
   Assignments.
   PB93-963267/CDH               See 0066
 PB93-963268/CDH
   Standard Document for Remedial Site Assess-
   ment Decisions.
   PB93-963268/CDH               See 0392
 PB93-963269/CDH
   Superfund Accelerated Cleanup Bulletin: Pre-
   sumptive Remedies for Municipal Landfill Sites.
   Volume 2, Number 1, February 1993.
   PB93-963269/CDH              See 0115
 PB93-963271/CDH
   Compendium of Good Ideas:  Models of Suc-
   cess and Lessons Learned. Volume  1. High-
   lights.
   PB93-963271/CDH              See 0133
 PB93-963272/CDH
   Compendium of Good Ideas:  Models of Suc-
   cess and Lessons Learned. Volume 2. Source
   Book.
   PB93-963272/CDH              See 0134
 PB93-963273/CDH
   Quality Assurance for Superfund  Environmen-
   tal Data Collection Activities.
   PB93-963273/CDH              See 0991
 PB93-963274/CDH
   Superfund: EPA/ICMA Superfund Revitaliza-
   tion Conference. Held in Chicago, Illinois on
   November 12-13, 1992.
   PB93-963274/CDH              See 0319
 PB93-963275/CDH
   Initiatives to Streamline the Alternative Reme-
   dial  Contracting  Strategy (ARCS) Contracts'
   Award Fee Process.
   PB93-963275/CDH              See 0033
                                                             PB93-963276/CDH
                                                               Performance Tracking under ARCS Contracts.
                                                               PB93-963276/CDH               See 0061
                                                            	PB93J63278/CDH	
                                                              "Amendment'to"'''Historical' Definitions  of	NPL	
                                                               Deletion Start and Completion Dates.
                                                               PB93-963278/CDH               See 0335
                                                             PB93-963279/CDH
                                                               Identification of a  Senior Superfund Official for
                                                               Addressing  Special  NPL Site-Related Issues.
                                                               PB93-963279/CDH               See 0348
                                                             PB93-963280/CDH
                                                               Guidance on Program Management Activities
                                                               under ARCS.
                                                               PB93-963280/CDH               See 0026
                                                            	PB9 3;963281/CDH	
                                                               Clarification of Delegation to Approve Consist-
                                                               ency Exemptions at NPL Sites.
                                                               PB93-963281/CDH               See 0336
                                                             PB93-963282/CDH
                                                               Use  of Time and Materials and  Cost Reim-
                                                               bursement Subcontracts for Remedial Actions
                                                               under the  Alternative  Remedial  Contracting
                                                               Strategy Contracts.
                                                               PB93-963282/CDH               See 1141
                                                             PB93-963283/CDH
                                                               Smart Moves  in  Superfund - Regional  Pilots
                                                               and Initiatives. Volume  1, Number 2, Septem-
                                                               ber 1992.
                                                               PB93-963283/CDH               See 0306
                                                             PB93-963284/CDH
                                                               Smart Moves in Superfund - Revitalization One
                                                               Year Later. Volume 1, Number  3,  January
                                                               1993.
                                                            	 PB93-963284/CDH               See 0307
                                                             PB93-963286/CDH
                                                               Superfund  Accelerated    Cleanup   Model
                                                               (SACM): Questions and  Answers.
                                                               PB93-963286/CDH               See 0121
                                                             PB93-963289/CDH
                                                               HSED SACM  Report. Volume  1, Number 1,
                                                               January 1993.
                                                            : =: PB93-963289/CDH               See 0096
                                                             PB93-963290/CDH
                                                               Response Action  Contractor Final  Indemnifica-
                                                               tion Guidelines. Volume 2, Number 1, March
                                                               1993.
                                                               PB93-963290/CDH               See 0067
                                                             PB93-963291/CDH
                                                               Further Direction  on Implementing the Super-
                                                               fund Accelerated Cleanup Model (SACM).
                                                               PB93-963291/CDH               See 0093
                                                             PB93-963292/CDH
                                                               Superfund Response Action Contracts.
                                                               PB93-963292/CDH               See 0074
                                                             PB93-963294/CDH
                                                               Superfund Administrative Improvements. Exec:
                                                               utive Summary.
                                                               PB93-963294/CDH               See 0310
                                                             PB93-963295/CDH
                                                               Superfund Administrative Improvements. Final
                                                               Report.
                                                               PB93-963295/CDH               See 0311
                                                             PB93-963297/CDH
                                                               Revisions to OMB Circular  A-94 on Guidelines
                                                               and Discount Rates for Benefit-Cost Analysis.
                                                               PB93-963297/CDH               See 1107
                                                             PB93-963298/CDH
                                                               Superfund Reauthorization: NACEPT Subcom-
                                                               mittee Handbook.

-------
                                                      NUMBER INDEX
                                                                  PB93-963420/CDH
PB93-963301
  Superfund Technical Assistance Grants (Fact
  Sheet).
  PB93-963301                    See 0503
PB93-963302
  Superfund   Technical  Assistance   Grants
  (TAGs) (Pamphlet).
  PB93-963302                    See 0505
PB93-963304/CDH
  Cost of Remedial Action Model.
  PB93-963304/CDH               See 1085
PB93-963305/CDH
  Superfund Fact Sheet: Arsenic.
  PB93-963305/CDH               See 0488
PB93-963306/CDH
  Superfund Fact Sheet: Exposure Pathways.
  PB93-963306/CDH               See 0393
PB93-963307/CDH
  Superfund Fact Sheet: Trichloroethylene.
  PB93-963307/CDH               See 0496
PB93-963308/CDH
  Superfund Fact Sheet: Benzene.
  PB93-963308/CDH               See 0489
PB93-963309/CDH
  Superfund Fact Sheet: PCBs.
  PB93-963309/CDH               See 0492
PB93-963310/CDH
  Superfund Fact Sheet: The Removal Program.
  PB93-963310/CDH               See 0495
PB93-963311/CDH
  Superfund Fact Sheet An Overview.
  PB93-963311 /CDH               See 0487
PB93-963312/CDH
  Superfund Fact Sheet: Community Interviews.
  PB93-963312/CDH               See 0490
PB93-963313/CDH
  Superfund Fact Sheet: Public Involvement.
  PB93-963313/CDH               See 0493
PB93-963314/CDH
  Superfund Fact Sheet: Identifying Sites.
  PB93-963314/CDH               See 0491
PB93-963315/CDH
  Superfund Fact Sheet: The Remedial Program.
  PB93-963315/CDH               See 0494
PB93-963316/CDH
  Specifications  and Guidance for Contaminant-
  Free Sample Containers.
  PB93-963316/CDH               See 0994
PB93-963317/CDH
  Implementing the Deputy  Administrator's Risk
  Characterization Memorandum.
  PB93-963317/CDH               See 1056
PB93-963318/CDH
  Cost  of  Remedial  Actions  (CORA) Model:
  Overview and Applications.
  PB93-963318/CDH               See 1086
PB93-963323/CDH
  Supplemental  Guide to Video on  Superfund
  Site Assessment  Screening: A National Priori-
  ty.
  PB93-963323/CDH        •       See 0394
PB93-963325/CDH
  Permits and Permit 'Equivalency' Processes for
  CERCLA On-Site Response Actions.
  PB93-963325/CDH               See 0435
PB93-963326/CDH
  Obligation  of  Funds under Superfund  State
  Contracts.
  PB93-963326/CDH               See 0478
PB93-963327/CDH
  NPL  Construction  Completion  Definition  at
  Bioremediation and Soil Vapor Extraction Sites.
  PB93-963327/CDH               See 0365
PB93-963328/CDH
  Compendium of ROD Language for FY 1993
  Focus Areas.
  PB93-963328/CDH               See 1083
PB93-963329/CDH
  Technology Selection Guide for Wood Treater
  Sites.
  PB93-963329/CDH               See 1122
PB93-963333/CDH
  Guidance on Setting Priorities for NPL Candi-
  date Sites.
  PB93-963333/CDH               See 0344
PB93-963334/CDH
  ATSDR Health Consultations under CERCLA.
  PB93-963334/CDH               See 1018
PB93-963336/CDH
  Ensuring the Adequacy of Cost Share Provi-
  sions In Superfund State Contracts.
  PB93-963336/CDH               See 0472
PB93-963338/CDH
  Discussions with the Public Concerning NPL
  Listings.
  PB93-963338/CDH               See 0339
PB93-963339/CDH
  Presumptive  Remedy for CERCLA Municipal
  Landfill Sites.
  PB93-963339/CDH               See 1105
PB93-963341/CDH
  Integrating Removal  and Remedial  Site  As-
  sessment Investigations.
  PB93-963341/CDH               See 0939
PB93-963342/CDH
  PA Review Checklist.
  PB93-963342/CDH               See 0366
PB93-963343/CDH
  Evaluation of the Likelihood of DNAPL Pres-
  ence at NPL Sites: National Results.
  PB93-963343/CDH               See 1448
PB93-963345/CDH
  Presumptive Remedies: Policy and Procedures.
  PB93-963345/CDH               See 1103
PB93-963346/CDH
  Presumptive  Remedies:  Site  Characterization
  and Technology Selection for  CERCLA Sites
  with Volatile Organic Compounds in Soils.
  PB93-963346/CDH               See 1104
PB93-963347/CDH
  Site Assessment: Evaluating Risks at Super-
  fund Sites.
  PB93-963347/CDH               See 1076
PB93-963348/CDH
  Guide to Community Involvement for  Site As-
  sessment Managers.
  PB93-963348/CDH               See 0476
PB93-963349/CDH
  ROD Annual Report, FY 1992.
  PB93-963349/CDH               See 1115
PB93-963350/CDH
  FACT BOOK: National Priorities List under the
  Original Hazard Ranking System, 1981-1991.
  PB93-963350/CDH               See 0340
PB93-963352
  Superfund Technical Assistance  Grant (TAG)
  Handbook: Applying for Your Grant.
  PB93-963352                   See 0500
PB93-963353
  Superfund Technical Assistance Grant (TAG)
  Handbook: The Application Forms with Instruc-
  tions.
  PB93-963353                    See 0501
PB93-963356/CDH
  Hazard Ranking System Guidance Manual.
  PB93-963356/CDH               See 0347
PB93-963360/CDH
  Use of IRIS Values in Superfund Risk Assess-
  ment.
  PB93-963360/CDH               See 1081
PB93-963401/CDH
  OSWER  Integrated Health and Safety Stand-
  ard Operating Practices.
  PB93-963401/CDH               See 0921
PB93-963402/CDH
  Guidance on Conducting Non-Time-Critical Re-
  moval Actions under CERCLA.
  PB93-963402/CDH               See 1005
PB93-963408/CDH
  Facility Response Plans.
  PB93-963408/CDH               See 0929
PB93-963409/CDH
  Understanding Oil Spills  and Oil  Spill  Re-
  sponse.
  PB93-963409/CDH               See 0978
PB93-963410/CDH
  Expedited Response Actions.
  PB93-963410/CDH               See 1003
PB93-963411/CDH
  Questions and Answers on Release Notifica-
  tion Requirements and  Reportabie Quantity
  Adjustments.
  PB93-963411 /CDH               See 1149
PB93-963412/CDH
  Guidance for Federal Facilities on Release No-
  tification Requirements  under CERCLA  and
  SARA Title ill.
  PB93-963412/CDH               See 0898
PB93-963413/CDH
  Guidance on  Implementation of the 'Contribute
  to Remedial Performance' Provision.
  PB93-963413/CDH               See 1093
PB93-963414/CDH
  Health and Safety Plan (HASP) User's Guide
  (Version 3.0/4.0).
  PB93-963414/CDH               See 0917
PB93-963415/CDH
  Field  Certification  Tracking System  (FCTS).
  User's Guide. Version 2.1.
  PB93-963415/CDH               See 0909
PB93-963416/CDH
  Determination of Imminent and Substantial En-
  dangerment for Removal Actions.
  PB93-963416/CDH               See 1000
PB93-963418/CDH
  Emergency Responders Agreements for Fund-
  Lead Remedial Actions.
  PB93-963418/CDH               See 1001
PB93-963419/CDH
  Effect  of  OSHA's  Bloodborne  Pathogens
  Standard on  Hazardous Waste Cleanup Activi-
  ties.
  PB93-963419/CDH               See 1026
PB93-963420/CDH
  Personal Air Sampling and Air Monitoring Re-
  quirements under 29 CFR 1910.120.
  PB93-963420/CDH                See 0922
                                                                                                                         NU-61

-------
 PB93-963422/CDH
           NUMBER INDEX
 PB93-963422/CDH
   Conducting Non-Tima-Crftical Removal Actions
   under CERCLA.
   PS93.963422/CDH               See 0999
 PB93-963424/CDH
   Soperfund Qukle: Rsportable Quantity Adjust-
   ment for Methyl Isocyanate (MIC).
   P883.963424/COH               See 1152
 PB93-963425/CDH
   Superfund Guide: Clean Air Act Hazardous Air
   fojutarjts, Add, odjpjhe, List  of CERCLA Haz-

..   93:9634??/CDli ...................    See 1151
                    '   ''         ....... "'"'  .......
 PB93-963609/CDH
  Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Cleanup
  Efforts Nationwide, Spring 1993 (French Limit-
  ed Site Profile, Harris County, Texas).
  PB93-963609/CDH                See 0954
 PB93-963610/CDH
  Revised  Policy  on Discretionary  Information
  Release under CERCLA.
  PB93-963610/CDH                See 0600
 PB93-963611/CDH
  Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Cleanup
  Efforts Nationwide, Spring  1993  (Powersville
  Site Prpfije, Peach County, Georgia).
  PB93-9636il/CbH                See 0958
 " ^assignment  of	CtP "Transportation" Func-	PB93-963612/CDH
  P893-963501/CDH               See 0063
 PB93-963502/CDH
  Extending' the Tracking of Analytical Services
  fiV Potentially Responsible Party-Lead Super-
  fund  Sites  (Supplemental  Guidance   on
  OSWER Directive 9240.0-2A).
  P893«963502/CDH               See 0986
 PB93:963506/CPH
  Summary of GIS Support to Superfund.
  P693:963506/CDH               See 1307
 PB93-963507/CDH
  Guidance for Evaluating the Technical Imprac-
  Ueabiity of Ground-Water Restoration.
  Pl93.963507/GpH               See 1460
 PBlS-9l3508/CpH" ..... ~  "",""'      ,  """'„! "!,,,',  ......
  Distribution of  DRAFT Soil Screening Level
  Guidance,
  PBS3.963508/CDH               See 1500
 PB93-963601/CDH
  Suporfund at Work; Hazardous Waste Cleanup
  Efforts Nationwide, Winter 1993.  (Wells G and
  H Site, Woburn, Massachusetts).
  PB93-96360i/CDH               See 0972
 PBjn-963602/CDH .....................................
  EnfofOermmt Project Management Handbook.
  PB93-963602/COH               See 0533
 PB93-963603/COH
  Suporiund at Work: Hazardous Waste Cleanup
  Efforts Nationwide, Spring 1993 (Triana/Ten-
  n«»se« Rivar Site, Alabama).
  P893 063G-33/CDH               See 0960
 PB93-963604/CDH
  Report to Congress:  Settlements with Munici-
  pal Waste Generators and Transporters Since
  1991 undar the Comprehensive Environmental
  Hfiponse. Compensation, and Liability Act of
  1980.
  P893-963604/CDH                See 0596
 PB93-963605/CDH
  Modal Administrative Order on Consent for Re-
  moval Actions,
  PB93-963605/COH                See 0574
 PB13-963606/QDH '. ...... I   ......... I  ..... '       '!'.!!'
  likW; Unf ataral Administrative Order" for  Re-
 i rtxjval Response Activities.
  P893-963606/COH                See 0579
  Sgpwfurtd at Wor  Hazardous Waste Cleanup
  Efforts   Nattonwkte,   Spring  1993   (United
  Chroma Products Site Profile).
  PB83-963607/CDH               See 0961
PBS3-963608/CDH
  Sujwfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Cleanup
  EWorts  Nationwide, Spring 1993  (Old Midland
  Products Site Profile, Yell County, Arkansas).
  PB03-96360a/COH               See 0957
  Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Cleanup
  Efforts  Nationwide,  Spring  1993  (Radium
  Chemical Site Profile, Queens, New York).
  PB93-963612/CDH               See 0959
PB93-963614/CDH
  Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Cleanup
  Efforts Nationwide, Spring 1993 (Harvey  and
  Knott Drum  Site,  New Castle  County, Dela-
  ware).
  PB93-963614/CDH               See 0956
PB93-963615/CDH
  Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Cleanup
  Efforts Nationwide, Summer 1993 (Tri-State
  Plating Site Profile, Columbus, Indiana).
  PB93-963615/CDH               See 0970
PB93-963616/CDH
  Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Cleanup
  Efforts Nationwide, Spring 1993 (Fulton Termi-
  nals Site Profile, Oswego County, NY).
  PB93-963616/CDH               See 0955
PB93-963617/CDH
  Streamlined Approach for Settlements with De
  Minimis  Waste  Contributors under CERCLA
  Section 122(g)(1)(A).
  PB93-963617/CDH               See 0870
PB93-963618/CPH
  Supplemental Guidance on Federal Superfund
  Liens.
  PB93-963618/CDH               See 0885
PB93-963619/CDH
  Guidance on CERCLA Settlements with De Mi-
  cromis Waste Contributors.
  PB93-963619/CDH                See 0547
PB93-963620/CPH	
  New Policy on  Performance of Risk Assess-
  ments during Remedial Investigation Feasibility
  Studies (RI/FS)  Conducted by Potentially  Re-
  sponsible Parties (PRPs).
  PB93-963620/CDH                See 1061
PB93-963626/CDH
  Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Cleanup
  Efforts Nationwide, Summer  1993  (Fike/Artel
  Chemical Site Profile,  Nitro, West Virginia).
  PB93-963626/CDH                See 0967
PB93-963627/CDH
  Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Cleanup
  Efforts Nationwide, Summer 1993 (Army  Creek
  Landfill Site Profile, New Castle, Delaware).
, PB93-963627/CPH  ,         	§66,0,992	
PB93-9636287CDH
  Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Cleanup
  Efforts Nationwide, Summer  1993 (Eastern Di-
  versified  Metals Site Profile,  Schuylkill County,
  Pennsylvania).
  PB93-963628/CDH                See 0966
PB93-963629/CDH
  Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Cleanup
  Efforts  Nationwide,  Summer 1993 (Rogue
   Valley/Ditch Creek Ranch Site Profile, Wimer,
   Oregon).
   PB93-963629/CDH               See 0969
 PB93-963631/CDH
   Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Cleanup
   Efforts  Nationwide, Summer  1993 (Common
   Steps in the Removal Process).
   PB93-963631/CDH               See 0965
 PB94-100161/CDH
   Hydraulic  Fracturing Technology:  Technology
   Evaluation  Report and  Application Analysis
   Report.
   PB94-100161/CDH               See 1265
 PB94-101797/CDH
   Engineering Bulletins: Aids to the Development
   of Remedial Alternatives.
   PB94-101797/CDH               See 1236
 PB94-101805/CDH
   SITE Demonstration of the Basic Extractive
   Sludge Treatment Process.
   PB94-101805/CDH               See 1300
 PB94-102407/CDH
   Design Considerations for Ambient Air Monitor-
   ing at Superfund  Sites.  Engineering Bulletin.
   PB94-102407/CDH               See 1402
 PB94-105426/CDH
   Engineering Bulletin: Landfill Covers.
   PB94-105426/CDH               See 1233
 PB94-105434/CDH
   Resources  Conservation  Company B.E.S.T.
   (Trade Name) Solvent  Extraction Technology:
   Application Analysis Report.
   PB94-105434/CDH               See 1294
 PB94-106333/CDH
   Solidification/Stabilization of Organics and In-
   organics.
   PB94-106333/CDH               See 1561
 PB94-110517/CDH
   Options for Developing and Evaluating Mitiga-
   tion  Strategies  for Indoor Air   Impacts at
   CERCLA Sites. Air/Superfund National Techni-
   cal Guidance Study Series, Report ASF-36.
   PB94-110517/CDH               See 1415
 PB94-112307/CDH
   Bioremediation Resource  Guide and Bioreme-
   diation Resource Matrix.
	PB94-J12307/CPH 	      ,   r  See 1425	
 PB94-112349/CDH
   Issues Paper on Radiation Site Cleanup Regu-
   lations.
   PB94-112349/CDH               See 1280
 PB94-112828/CDH
   Will  Soil Working  Work for the  Sand  Creek
   Superfund  Site.
   PB94-112828/CDH               See 1548
 PB94-112836/CDH
   Comparison of Organic Emissions from Haz-
   ardous Waste  Incinerators versus the  1990
   Toxic Release Inventory Air Releases.
   PB94-112836/CDH               See 1397
 PB94-114659/CDH,,    „	
   Operations  and Research at the U.S. EPA In-
   cineration Research Facility: Annual Report for
   FY92.
   PB94-114659/CDH               See 1485
 PB94-117439/CDH
   Accutech Pneumatic Fracturing Extraction and
   Hot Gas Injection, Phase 1. Applications Analy-
   sis Report.
   PB94-117439/CDH               See 1190
NU-62

-------
                                                       NUMBER INDEX
                                                                   PB94-963204/CDH
PB94-117470/CDH
  Guide  for  Conducting  Treatability  Studies
  under CERCLA:  Biodegradation Remedy Se-
  lection. Interim Guidance.
  PB94-117470/CDH               See 1159
PB94-120045/CDH
  BioGenesis (Trade Name) Soil Washing Tech-
  nology:  Innovative   Technology   Evaluation
  Report.
  PB94-120045/CDH               See 1490
PB94-121688/CDH
  Ground-Water Issue: Potential Sources of Error
  in  Ground-Water  Sampling at   Hazardous
  Waste Sites.
  PB94-121688/CDH               See 1456
PB94-123858/CDH
  Superfund  Innovative  Technology  Evaluation
  Program: Technology Profiles, Sixth  Edition.
  PB94-123858/CDH               See 1318
PB94-123874/CDH
  Superfund  Innovative  Technology  Evaluation
  Program: Annual Report to Congress 1992.
  PB94-123874/CDH               See 1309
PB94-124039/CDH
  Pilot-Scale Demonstration of a Slurry-Phase Bi-
  ological  Reactor  for  Creosote-Contaminated
  Soil. Applications Analysis Report.
  PB94-124039/CDH               See 1426
PB94-124658/CDH
  CWM PO*WW*ER (Trade Name) Evaporation-
  Catalytic Oxidation  Technology: Applications
  Analysis Report.
  PB94-124658/CDH               See 1225
PB94-124674/CDH
  Toronto Harbour  Commissioners  (THC) Soil
  Recycle Treatment Train. Applications Analysis
  Report.
  PB94-124674/CDH               See 1544
PB94-130747/CDH
  Application of 'Real-Time' Monitoring in Deci-
  sion  Making: The New  Bedford Harbor  Pilot
  Dredging Project.
  PB94-130747/CDH               See 1574
PB94-131646/CDH
  Membrane Treatment of Wood Preserving Site
  Groundwater by SBP Technologies, Inc. Appli-
  cations Analysis Report.
  PB94-131646/CDH               See 1468
PB94-134376/CDH
  Potential  Sources of  Error in  Ground-Water
  Sampling  at  Hazardous  Waste  Sites.  Ground
  Water Issue.
  PB94-134376/CDH               See 1472
PB94-135118/CDH
  Treatment of Nonhazardous Petroleum-Con-
  taminated Soils by Thermal Desorption Tech-
  nologies.
  PB94-135118/CDH               See 1547
PB94-136264/CDH
  Technology Evaluation Report:  SITE Program
  Demonstration. EPA RREL's Mobile  Volume
  Reduction Unit.
  PB94-136264/CDH               See 1348
PB94-136678/CDH
  Meeting Summary:  National Advisory  Council
  on Environmental Policy and Technology (1st).
  Subcommittee on Radiation Cleanup  Regula-
  tion.  Held in  Washington, DC. on October 18-
  19,1993.
  PB94-136678/CDH               See 1059
PB94-137353/CDH
  Advanced  Oxidation  Technologies  for  the
  Treatment of Contaminated Groundwater.
  PB94-137353/CDH               See 1429
PB94-138815/CDH
  Methods  for  Evaluating  the  Attainment  of
  Cleanup Standards. Volume 2. Ground Water.
  PB94-138815/CDH               See 1469
PB94-138948/CDH
  EPA/Navy CERCLA Remedial Action Technol-
  ogy Guide.
  PB94-138948/CDH               See 1241
PB94-140613/CDH
  Literature Review Summary of Metals  Extrac-
  tion Processes Used to Remove Lead from
  Soils.
  PB94-140613/CDH               See 1518
PB94-141652/CDH
  BEN: A Model to Calculate the Economic Ben-
  efits  of  Noncompliance. User's  Manual  (Re-
  vised).
  PB94-141652/CDH               See 1205
PB94-141678/CDH
  CASHOUT User's Manual for Superfund.
  PB94-141678/CDH               See 0515
PB94-144136/CDH
  Guide  for  Conducting  Treatability   Studies
  under CERCLA: Biodegradation  Remedy Se-
  lection. Quick Reference Fact Sheet.
  PB94-144136/CDH               See 1160
PB94-144250/CDH
  EPA  Engineering Issue: Technology  Alterna-
  tives  for the Remediation of PCB-Contaminat-
  ed Soil and Sediment.
  PB94-144250/CDH               See 1501
PB94-144540/CDH
  Accessing Federal Data Bases for Contaminat-
  ed Site Clean-Up  Technologies (Third Edition).
  PB94-144540/CDH               See 1185
PB94-146495/CDH
  Abstracts of  Phase 1 and Phase 2  Awards:
  Small Business Innovation Research Program
  1991.
  PB94-146495/CDH               See 0016
PB94-149879/CDH
  Tech Trends: The Applied Technologies Jour-
  nal for Superfund Removals and Remedial Ac-
  tions and RCRA Corrective Actions, December
  1993.
  PB94-149879/CDH               See 1332
PB94-155256/CDH
  Sorption, Important  in  Stabilized/Solidified
  Waste Forms.
  PB94-155256/CDH               See 1563
PB94-157765/CDH
  Evaluation  of   Unsaturated/Valdose  Zone
  Models for Superfund Sites.
  PB94-157765/CDH               See 1449
PB94-157773/CDH
  Identification  and Compilation of Unsaturated/
  Vadose Zone Models.
  PB94-157773/CDH               See 1464
PB94-159092/CDH
  Annual RREL Research Symposium (20th) Ab-
  stract Proceedings. Held in Cincinnati, Ohio  on
  March 15-17, 1994.
  PB94-159092/CDH               See 1184
PB94-160603/CDH
  Thermal  Desorption   Treatment   (February
  1994).
  PB94-160603/CDH               See 1487
PB94-160637/CDH
  Chemical    Waste    Management,    Inc.
  PO*WW*ER  (Trade Name)  Evaporation-Cata-
  lytic  Oxidation  Technology.  Technology Eval-
  uation Report. Volume 1.
  PB94-160637/CDH               See 1213
PB94-160660/CDH
  Chemical    Waste    Management,    Inc.
  PO*WW*ER (Trade Name) Evaporation-Cata-
  lytic Oxidation Technology. Technology Evalu-
  tion Report. Volume 2.
  PB94-160660/CDH               See 1214
PB94-162716/CDH
  Potential Surrogate Metals for Incinerator Trial
  Burns.
  PB94-162716/CDH               See 1486
PB94-162740/CDH
  Remediation of Contaminated Soils by Solvent
  Flushing.
  PB94-162740/CDH               See 1529
PB94-163532/CDH
  Engineered  Biofilter  for  Removing  Organic
  Contaminants in Air.
  PB94-163532/CDH               See 1403
PB94-500642/CDH
  Inorganic   Contract  Compliance  Screening
  System (ICCSS) Software (ILM02.1 Version 4)
  (for Microcomputers).
  PB94-500642/CDH               See 0038
PB94-500998/CDH
  BEN Model:  Calculates Violators' Economic
  Benefits from Noncompliance (Version 4.0)  (for
  Microcomputers).
  PB94-500998/CDH               See 0514
PB94-501012/CDH
  CASHOUT Model: Calculates Current Value of
  Superfund  Cleanup Costs (Version  1.2)  (for
  Microcomputers).
  PB94-501012/CDH               See 1208
PB94-501335/CDH
  Organic  Contract   Compliance  Screening
  System (OCCSS)  Software (OLM01.8 Version
  6) (for Microcomputers).
  PB94-501335/CDH               See 0053
PB94-501467/CDH
  Inorganic   Contract  Compliance  Screening
  System (ICCSS) Software (ILM02.1 Version 5)
  (for Microcomputers).
  PB94-501467/CDH               See 0039
PB94-780012/CDH
  Instructional Package on Regulatory Air Quality
  Modeling. Part 1:  Videos on the  'Guideline on
  Air  Quality Models (Revised)'  and the Model
  Clearinghouse (Video).
  PB94-780012/CDH               See 1412
PB94-921100/CDH
  Health  Effects Assessment Summary Tables.
  PB94-921100/CDH               See 1053
PB94-963201/CDH
  Superfund Accelerated Cleanup Model (SACM)
  Coordination Strategy.
  PB94-963201/CDH               See 0120
PB94-963202/CDH
  Superfund: EPA/ICMA Superfund Revitaliza-
  tion Conference. Held in San  Francisco, Cali-
  fornia on February 1-2, 1993.
  PB94-963202/CDH               See 0320
PB94-963203/CDH
  Data Quality Objectives Process for Superfund:
  Interim Final Guidance.
  PB94-963203/CDH               See 0983
PB94-963204/CDH
  Data Quality Objectives Process for Superfund:
  Workbook.
  PB94-963204/CDH               See 0984
                                                                                                                          NU-63

-------
 PB94-963205/CDH
1   Illttili!- •'! , ,-  :,'•> ''(..'  1 • ..... jih!   ; jRI
 PB94-963205/CDH
   Data O^Sty effectives Process for Superfund.

  Superfund Program and  Information Manage-
  ment Update. Volume 1, Number 1, November

  Pl34*-9632d8/CDH'	
PB94-9S3209/CDH
  NACEPT Materials for Meeting  Held on Sep-
  tember 20-21,1993.
  P894-963209/CDH	     See 0143
                    on "Worst Sites' arid 'NPL
         Sites' to Assist In SACM Implementa-
   <9fl-
   PB84463206/C0H               See 0083
 PB84-963207/CDH
   Data Quality Objectives Process for Superfund.
   PB94J63207/CDH               See 0982
'                 [[[
                                  See 0123
       rtund Administrative Improvements: Rein-
         Superfund.
       i-9632iO/CQH                Sea 0312
 PB84-863211/CDH
..... ®SiR,SfflrBS?sIPe(Srn™ndat'<>ns jp, Ad-
  rSnfsUatof Browner. ........
  PB94-96321 1 /CDH                See 0142
 PB94-S63214/CDH
  Ffroceduras to Ensure that CLP Laboratories
  Ars Not Patd for Non-Compliant or Unuseable
  D*ta.
  PB94;963214/CipH                See 0062
 PBiI-9i321S/CDH .........................................
  Ovorvtow' of trie Outyear Liability Model (OLM).
  PS84-963215/CDH                See 0107
 PB94-963216/CDH
  Status  of Regional  Superfund  Pilots:  End-of-
  Y««r Report.
  PS94.963218/COH                See 0309
 PB94-863217/CDH
  Superfund Revitafeation:  Measures  of  Suc-
  cess.
  PB94-963217/CDH                See 0334
 PBS4-963219/CDH
  Expectations for Full Implementation of SACM.
  P884-963219/COH                S??.P092
 PB94-&63220/CDH
  Suporfund Program  Implementation  Manual,
  Ftocal Year 1994. Volume 1. Program Goals
  «Bxl  PtannJng  Requirements. Volume 2. Pro-
  gram Implementation Procedures.
  PB94-963220/CDH               See 0124
 PB94-963221/CDH
  National Superfund  Program Priorities,  Fiscal
  Year 1934.
  PB94-963221/CDH               See 0298
 PB94-963222/CDH
  Dlta Quality Objoctives Decision Error Feasi-
  bltty Trials (DEFT) Beta Version 1.01. User's
  Guide,
  PB94.963222/COH               See 0979
 PB94-963232/CDH
  Audit Management Process. Reference Guide.
  PB94-963232/CDH               See 0085
 PB94-963233/CDH
  SRtS System Overview and User's Guide.
  PB94-963233/CDH               See 01 12
           NUMBER INDEX
 PB94-963234/CDH
  Progress  Toward  Implementing  Superfund,
  Fiscal Year 1991. Report to Congress.
  PB94-983234/CDH.               See 0302
 PB94-963238/CDH
  NACEPT Meeting. Held in Crystal City, Virginia
  on February 11,1994.
  PB94-963238/CDH                See 0144
 PB94-963239/CDH
  Superfund  Reform Act of 1994.
  PB94-963239/CDH                See 0332
 PB94-963243/CDH
  Procedure  for Use of USAGE Preplaced Con-
  tracts to Expedite Superfund Cleanup Tasks.
  PB94-963243/CDH                See 1131
 PB94-963245/CDH
  Superfund  Strategic Plan and  Implementation
  Strategy Fiscal Year 1994.
  PB94-963245/CDH                See 0126
 PB94-963246/CDH
  Superfund  Strategic Plan and  Implementation
  Strategy Rscal Year 1994: Office and Division
  Plans.
  PB94-963246/CDH                See 0127
 PB94-963247/CDH
  Superfund   Program  Management  Manual,
  Rscal Year 1994.
  PB94-963247/CDH                See 0073
 PB94-963249/CDH
  Military Base Closures: Guidance on EPA Con-
  currence in the Identification of Uncontaminat-
  ed Parcels under CERCLA Section 120(h)(4).
  PB94-963249/CDH                See 0899
 PB94-963501/CDH
  USEPA Contract Laboratory Program National
  Functional   Guidelines  for  Organic  Data
  Review.
  PB94-963501/CDH                See 0077
 PB94-963502/CDH
  USEPA Contract Laboratory Program National
  Functional   Guidelines   for Inorganic  Data
  Review.
  PB94-963502/CDH               See 0997
 PB94-963503/CDH
  Technical Background Document for Draft Soil
  Screening Level Guidance.
  PB94-963503/CDH               See 1537
 PB94-963601/CDH
  Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Cleanup
  Efforts Nationwide,  Fall 1993  (Brown  Wood
  Preserving Site Profile, Suwanee County, Flori-
  da).
  PB94-963601/CDH               See 0950
PB94-963602/CDH
  Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Cleanup
  Efforts Nationwide, Fall 1993 (Johns-Manville
  Site Profile, Illinois).
  PB94-963602/CDH               See 0952
PB94-963604/CDH
  Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Cleanup
  Efforts Nationwide, Fall  1993 (Bunker Hill Site
  Profile, Silver Valley, Northern Idaho).
  PB94-963604/CDH               See 0951
PB94-983606/CDH
  First  125 De  Minimis Settlements: Statistics
  from EPA's De Minimis Database.
  PB94-963606/CDH               See 0543
	 PB94-963607/CDH	
    Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Cleanup
    Efforts Nationwide, Summer  1993  (Chisman
    Creek Site Profile, York County, Virginia).
'" •  PB94-963607/CDH               See 0963
  PB94-963608/CDH
    Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Cleanup
    Efforts Nationwide, Fall  1993 (Big  D Camp-
    ground Site Profile, Ashtabula County,  Kings-
    ville, Ohio).
    PB94-963608/CDH               See 0949
  PB94-963609/CDH
    Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Cleanup
    Efforts Nationwide, Summer 1993 (Coal Creek
    Site Profile, Chehalis, Washington).
    PB94-963609/CDH               See 0964
  PB94-963610/CDH
    Superfund and Small Waste Contributors.
                                                                                           PB94-963610/CDH
                                                                                                                          See 0881
  PB94-963611/CDH
   Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Cleanup
   Efforts Nationwide,  Summer 1993 (Northside
   Landfill Site Profile, Spokane, Washington).
   PB94-963611 /CDH                See 0968
  PB94-963612/CDH
   Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Cleanup
   Efforts Nationwide, Winter 1994 (Seymour Re-
   cycling Site Profile, Seymour, Indiana).
   PB94-963612/CDH                See 0975
  PB94-963613/CDH
   Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Cleanup
   Efforts Nationwide, Winter 1994 (Bailey Waste
   Disposal Site Profile, Texas).
   PB94-963613/CDH                See 0973
  PB94-963614/CDH
   Roles and Responsibilities of Regional Project
   Officers, Zone Project Officers, Work Assign-
   ment  Managers  and Contracting  Officers for
   the RCRA Enforcement, Permitting and Assist-
   ance Contracts (REPA).
   PB94-963614/CDH                See 0070
  PB94-963615/CDH
   Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Cleanup
   Efforts Nationwide, Winter 1994 (New Brighton
   Site Profile,  Minneapolis/St. Paul,  Minnesota).
   PB94-963615/CDH                See 0974
  RCN-258-040-27-03
   Air/Superfund National  Technical  Guidance
   Study  Series. Database  of  Emission  Rate
   Measurement Projects.
   PB91-222059/CDH                See 1379
  REPT-15-13GO-00
   Endangerment Assessment Handbook.
   PB92-102144/CDH                See 0530
  TETRAT-TC-3218-10
   Commencement  Bay Nearshore/Tideflats Fea-
   sibility Study. Executive Summary.
   PB93-181220/CDH                See 1579
  TETRAT-TC-3218-VOL-1
   Commencement  Bay Nearshore/Tideflats Fea-
   sibility Study. Volume 1.
   PB93-181238/CDH                See 1580
  TETRAT-TC-3218-VOL-2
   Commencement  Bay Nearshore/Tideflats Fea-
   sibility Study. Volume 2. Appendices.
   PB93-181246/CDH                See 1581
  USGS/WRI-89-4081
   Hydrogeology and Results of Aquifer Tests in
   the Vicinity  of a Hazardous-Waste Disposal
   Site Near Byron,  Illinois.
   PB90-130188/CDH                See 1463
NU-64

-------
NTIS Price Schedules
NTIS generally uses price codes to indicate the cost of items sold. The following schedules convert these
codes into actual prices.
  For Customers in the U.S., Canada,
  and Mexico
  Standard Prices
  "A" Codes
  Price
  Code               Price
  *A01 	$6.00
  *A02	9.00
  A03	 17.50
  A04thruA05	 19.50
  A06thruA09	 27.00
  A10thruA13	36.50
  A14thruA17	44.50
  A18thruA21 	52.00
  A22thruA25	61.00
  A99          Contact NTIS
                  for price
  "N" Codes
  Price
  Code
  N01	
  N02	
  N03	
 Price
. $65
... 59
... 20
  :A01 for microfiche is $9.00
  A02 for microfiche is $12.50
   Microcomputer
   Diskettes
   "D" Codes
   Price
   Code
   D01	
   D02	
   DOS	
   D04	
   D05	
   D06	
   D07	
   DOS	
   D09	
   D10	
   D11	
   D12	
   D13	
   D14	
   D15	
   D16	
   D17	
   D18	
 Price
 $55
 ..90
 , 140
 , 195
 . 250
 . 300
 . 360
 . 410
 . 460
 . 520
 . 570
 . 630
 . 680
 . 740
 . 790
 . 840
 . 890
 . 950
Exception Prices
"E" Codes
Price
Code               Price
E01	 $12.50
E02	 15.50
EOS	 17.50
E04	20.50
EOS	22.50
E06	25.50
E07	28.50
EOS	32.00
E09	35.00
E10	38.00
E11	41.00
E12	45.00
E13	48.00
£14	52.00
E15	56.00
E16	62.00
E17	67.00
E18	72.00
E19	80.00
E20	 92.00
E99          Contact NTIS
                for price
 Magnetic Tape
 "T" Codes
 Price
 Code
 T01	
 T02	
 T03	
 T04	
 T05	
 T06	
 T07	
 T08	
   D19	 1,000
   D99          Contact NTIS
                   for price
  Price
 $180
.. 240
.. 360
.. 480
.. 590
... 710
... 820
... 940
 T09	 1,050
 T10	 1,160
 T11 	 1,270
 T12	 1,390
 T13	 1,500
 T14	 1,620
 T15	 1,740
 T16	 1,850
 T17	 1,960
 T18	2,080
 T19	2,190
 T99          Contact NTIS
                 for price
For Customers outside the U.S.,
Canada, and
Standard Prices
"A" Codes
Price
Code
*A01 	
*A02 	
A03 	
A04 thru A05 	
A06 thru A09 	
A10thruA13 	
A14thruA17 	
A18thruA21 	
A22thruA25 	
Mexico

Exception Prices
"E" Codes
Price
Price Code
.... $12 E01 	
	 18 E02 	
	 35 E03 	
	 39 E04 	
54 £05 	
	 73 E06 	
	 89 E07 	
104 E08 	
122 E09 	
A99 ContactNTIS E10 	

"N" Codes
Price
Code
N01 	
N02 	
N03 	


*A01 for microfiche
for price E11 	
E12 	
E13 	
Price £1 4
	 $85 E15 	
	 75 E16 	
	 40 E17 	
E18 	
E19 	
is $18.00 E20 	
A02 for microfiche is $25.00 E99

Microcomputer
Diskettes
"D" Codes
Price
Code
D01 	
D02 	
DOS 	
D04 	
D05 	
D06 	
D07 	
DOS 	
D09 	
D10 	
D11 	
D12 	
D13 	
D14 	
D15 	
D16 	
D17 	
D18 	
D19 	

Magnetic Tape
"T" Codes
Price
Code
Price T01 	
....$110 T02 	
	 180 T03 	
	 280 T04 	
	 390 T05 	
	 500 T06 	
	 600 T07 	
	 720 T08 	
	 820 T09 	
	 920 T10 	
... 1,040 T11 	
...1,140 T12 	
...1,260 T13 	
... 1,360 T14 	
...1,480 T15 	
...1,580 T16 	
...1,680 T17 	
...1,780 T18 	
... 1,900 T19 	
... 2,000 T99
D99 ContactNTIS

for price


Price
	 $25
	 31
	 35
	 41
	 45
	 51
	 57
	 	 64
	 70
	 76
	 82
	 90
	 96
	 104
	 112
	 124
	 134
	 144
	 160
	 184
ContactNTIS
for price



Price
	 $360
	 480
	 720
	 960
	 1,180
	 1,420
	 1,640
	 1,880
	 2,100
	 2,320
	 2,540
	 2,780
	 3,000
	 3,240
	 3,480
	 3,700
	 3,920
	 4,160
	 4,380
Contact NTIS
for price

  Prices are subject to change
                                                                                      Effective 7/1/94

-------
:  Hi K  i
                                    I	(!•

-------
0)
(0
8
O.
   NTIS, Order  Form
    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
    Technology Administration
    National Technical Information Service
    Springfield, VA 22161
          Ship to Address
    Date .
          (703) 487-4650
          or FAX this form to (703) 321-8547
              To verify receipt of your FAX order,
              call (703) 487-4679.
For Rush Service—Call 1-800-553-NTIS
Rush service is available for an additional fee.
To order subscriptions, call (703) 487-4630.
TDD (For hearing impaired only), call (703) 487-4639.
                                                               Payment
WT or TYPE
Company
Attention
Last Name
Suite or Room Number

Title
First Initial

                                                         D Charge my NTIS Deposit Account .	—	


                                                         Charge my     D [•••I


                                                          Account No. I   I   I  I   I

                                                          Exp.	Cardholder's name
                                               J	|
    Full Street Address Required
                                                                                          (Please print)
                    (Required to validate all orders)

  ] Check/Money order enclosed for $_
    City
                              State
                                         ZIP
    Telephone number
                                Fax number
                                 (Payable in U.S. dollars)

D Bill me #—Add $7.50 per order if full payment does not
  accompany order. Purchase orders accepted only from
  government agencies, educational institutions, or corporations
  in the U.S., Canada & Mexico.
          DTIC Users Code

          Contract No.	
                             Last six digits
     Return Policy:
     Although NTIS cannot accept returns for credit or refund, we will
     gladly replace any item you requested if we made an error in filling
     your order, if the item was defective, or if you received it in a
     damaged condition. Just call our Customer Service Department at
     (703) 487-4660.
          Order Selection

Enter NTIS order numbers
(Ordering by title alone will delay your order)
U, 1- CDH
>: 2. CDH
5 3. CDH
£ 4. CDH
£ 5. CDH
$ 6. CDH
ra
£ 7. CDH
8. CDH
*NTIS will label each item with up to eight
characters of your organization's routing
code.
Prices are subject to change.
The NTIS Sales Desk (703) 487-4650
can provide pricing verification.
PR-OFA7/94
All previous versions of this order form .
are obsolete.
Customer
Routing*
optional
(up to 8 digits)








Unit
Price








Quantity
Paper
Copy








Micro-
fiche









Value of Order Handling Fee
$10.00 or less $2.00
$10.01 -$50.00 $4.00
$50.01 -$100.00 $6.00
Over $100.00 $8.00
Add $2.00 to above for orders sent
outside of the U.S., Canada, and Mexico.


Other








Specify density
for tape orders
1600bpi








6250 bpi








3480
cartridge









Internat'l
Air Mail
Fee
(see reverse)








SUBTOTAL from other side
Total
Handling Fee per order
(see chart at left)
Payment not included. Please bill me, add $7.50
(Available for U.S., Canada, and Mexico only)
GRAND TOTAL
TOTAL
PRICE













| | OVER — Order continued on reverse

-------
           Order Selection (cont.)
                                                                                  NTIS
	 , 	 	 	 , 	 	 	 ,.. ,
Enter NTIS order numbers
(Ordering by title alone will delay your order)
9. ! ,', ;;; ; ,i ' '.;'.' cbri
10, CDH
11. CDH
12. CDH
13. CDH
14. CDH
15. CDH
16. CDH
17. CDH
18. CDH
19. CDH
20. CDH
Customer
Routing*
(up to 8 digits)












Unit
Price












Quantity
Paper
Copy












Micro-
fiche












Other

•:,








i

Specify density
for tape orders
1600 bpi












6250 bpi




!







3480
cartridge













Internat'l
Air Mail
(see below)












:, :.': , : ,~, '— : ::• • :.,:: -".: 	 :":. :: :• 	 ' 	 , ' :,' : ;• 	 "• '•:".".".. " " 1 • ' ':' : :" ,• "
'NTIS will label each item with up to eight characters of your organization's routing code. Subtotal
TOTAL
PRICE













UJ
ou
EC
0.
flj
w
to
C)
cu
                                                                             EA/7E/J on the other side.
          FREE Catalogs & Information
    Call (703) 487-4650 and ask for any of the following free
    titles or check the appropriate box below.

    Q PR-827 - NTIS Products & Services Catalog

    Q PR-186- Published Search* Master Catalog

    Q PR:261 - Directory of U.S. Government Software for
               Mainframes and Microcomputers

    Q PR-629- Directory of U.S. Government Datafiles for
               Mainframes and Microcomputers

    Q PR-746- Directory of Federal Laboratory & Technology
               Resources

    Q PR-758- Environmental Datafiles & Software Catalog

    Q PR-797- NTIS A!erts-(fprrnerly Abstract Newsletters)
               customized current awareness bulletins

    Q PR-868- Environmental Highlights (catalog of reports on the
               environment)

    Q PR-888- CD-ROMs & Optical Discs Available From NTIS

    Q PR-936- FedWqrtdf — Free Access to the Electronic Market-
               place of U.S. and Foreign Government Information
       International Shipping —~~»._.


Paper copy reports and microfiche copies are shipped surface
mail unless Air Mail is requested.

!*•' Air Mail"Fees'"  '	'	
Canada and Mexico add $4 per paper copy report;
$1 per microfiche copy.
Other countries add $8 per paper copy report;
$1.25 per microfiche copy.
Computer products are shipped by air courier as part of the
regular handling fee.
For a copy of the latest NTIS price code conversion table,
call (703) 487-4650 and ask for PR-360-3 for prices in the
U.S., Canada and Mexico. Ask for PR-360-4 for the
conversion table for prices for all other countries.
After the original stock of a technical report is exhausted, NTIS
reprints directly from the master archive copy. These printed-to-
order copies are the best possible reproductions.
For more order forms, call (703) 487-4650 and ask for PR-OFA.

-------

-------
F"1''!!1111:'"1;1'':* ..... • ..... W ......... i ........... F5 ..... iW
                              ..... H" ...... F ......... W ..... Ti!l:W ..... ........ Pfl! .......... "!!! ........ ..... ! ...... '''"If"? ...... ill1' ............ ! ...... Eli'"' ........... !!!! ...... I ..... ?! ........ '••K>5:
"TO	
1

-------
          Stay Current with Government
                   Environmental Issues
                       and  Technologies
            Subscribe to current awareness bulletin—
       NTIS Alerts on Environmental Pollution & Control
If you need to keep current with the
latest research and studies concerning
the environment,  NTIS Alerts on
Environmental  Pollution & Control makes
it easy.

This bulletin gives you - twice a month
- summaries of reports on all the latest
U.S. and foreign government-sponsored
studies and research. You can
familiarize yourself with the broad base
of information  that's available and zero
in on exactly those reports that will
keep you up to date.

Reports such as Superfund Records of
Decision (ROD), guidance manuals,
pesticide fact sheets, assessment
guidelines, EPA policy studies, pollution
control technology, and more. Plus, the
newsletter lists environment reports from
foreign  sources.

The  8,000 studies announced annually in
the Alert are divided into the categories
below:
•  Air pollution and control
•  Noise pollution and control
•  Solid waste pollution and control
•  Water pollution and control
•  Pesticides pollution and control
•  Radiation pollution and control
•  Environmental health and safety
•
NTIS, Alert

Environmental Pollution & Control














^_
*

















L^
J^
May 15. 1993
Air Pollution & Control

—Foreign Technology—

y. st&iusseminar d« P8VVU zum Forschungsschwerpunfct
•WakfschiiedCti'. Proceeding*. {Second status seminar ot
the 'Bavarian Project Croup on Research into the Effect
of Environmental Pofiutants (PBWU)' on th« major
research area 'forest decline'. Proceedings).
M. fieinher, M, Kirchrver. and K. Hoessi.
^iKaentjRgszeriirum fuer Umwstt und Gesundheii G.rr:.b.H..
.-^l'yal«j"s. ptiysiot'jg&a! Kivcstiga-
tjcns and maHiematicai modellings. Data presented comprise
msasuremsnia c? air pdluiants: meteorological parameters:
vegetation investigations; vapour exchangs msasurerrients in

feaves: changes in. the fevers of sulfur co.— pounds, secondary
metaboihes. monoterpenes. phenols, nutri^ve elements
(t'^ri.K.P), crassii^saons of fofsst deciine phenoniena; root
t-^i'i.-.-.^,,, -^ijg,— .^. (,i" ' fin/wu " "
/1IIH. . J,
^flfl«^K£Z
Advanced lightweight ceramic candie filter module.
j. f. Zievsrs. and P. Eggerstedi.
laAi&tfi3i Fsner ana Pump Mfg. Co.. Cfcero. !L i9S2. 'l^i
fXH^P S?H3SJ r!B tJS Uep.vimenl fil Energtf cfmtf.icisws

systems. MorgantoWn. \W lUnited States). 15-17 Sep )S9£.
5oenEcrea by Department oi Cnerav. 'Washington. DC.
DE9300021 1/VreP Price code: PC A03/MF AOI
To deter-ipg (he c«jnO«nic '!»"«,•! t=f !«i!'i wxstfil ^sftimiCT.
severs! sizes 2? fijters were cost estimated for operation at
at?.i osi f * 5 bar) based on ihs use cf al! Snht weight ceram-
v.t (f-.two/5-d-rf.^} ws. !he u£fi cf CGfiied alley (RAaiH.'. is&f:-
sheets and s»wn .^'Md-; wmlte (Aivy/fug A Prf m^w tfa-
"~^S^K
fivery system was included in both estimates. 1 1*: Fit;tv/RbrC
system was estimated w-th the piw^iin (.ii.rajn white tn£
AE!cw/SiC system was ha-^il f«i twiticjfir/nozzia desicr Saf-
wy bmdft «f«ft trwr Mbt» and jet pulse deRvety systems, £*'
wOfh^i. B.-SU. no main vaives or dust removal systems, tt MM
found that the cost of Fibro/nbre components waift tw*ne*l.
ently lower than ttw cost of the Alloy/SiC: fasti^ujtu-nls- tni«
comparison is iifusirates m Figure H

_^^
Alternative Conlrot Technology Documont for Bakary
Oven Entlaalons.
R'jsearch Triangle Inst.. Research Triangle Part-:, NC: Ht« 02
106p EPA/453y'R-92/017 Sponsorefl by fcrtvao-Bi^nlal
Protection Agency, Research ln.ifk)i.: pyik, x-JC. Office of Air
Quatiiy PLsnninQ Ann S!.'in.-io"fc
PB93-1S7618/WEP Price cntit-., Pt: A06/MF A02
The document was produced in response tf> a niymst by the
baking industry for Federal gLwwj'st'a'! !y u^$isi in providing a
more uniform mbyinAh&t l«iw lor State decisJon-making witn
tsQfua in ftOftboi ot bakery oven emissions. The informa&on
si Hsu document Dertairts to bskenes thai produce ytflAi LSI-
v-ened bread, rolls, buns, and simitar produej* but nut crach-
«rs. sweet goods, or baked footfiiuitft mwt in.! not yeast fea-
vened. Information on me rmfctni] jwuw.tsses. equipment oper-
ating pJifitn'rtitraA, j'xjlutilial (jtnissions from baking, and poten-
IMI miosjkjn control options are presented. Catatyttc firm ».-.
generative oxidation are identified as the most .ippfi.ipria!*- e*.
isting control lechnofogies af^tcanife 10 vrx: emissions from
bakery ovens. Cost aattysm (ot votaiytic and regenerstive
oudaiwn A« HV^wfcd A wedictive fonnub for iise in eatima!-
"ig ovtTi ymissicns has been derived from source isste ifiji«.:
in function witfi the dsvelopmeni o( the ditnunx^nt us u»e and
applicability are descnbed.


Analyaia ot Post-combustion Catalytic Emissions
Treatment. Rnal Task Report. June-August 1332.
J H. R^gaibuto.
Illinois Univ. at Chicago. Dept, ot Cnemica! t-iKjitsr-^iaa 15
Dec S2. 5?p GRi-assUGAb SjXu^a.aw* by Gas Research
tnst., Cntcsgfi. I! ,
PB33-lS72S7yWEP P,HA rajah: R.: A04/MF AOt
Tha CLTreni poisRtiai fsr pait-i^irtirMAisjr: vsia^-li? «esuri€rit
cf naturai gaa engnws rms ijnvn determinecf by a literature
fjnut>y ;im! wjniu yfomenOry design ca-cuiatkms (of mfii^ra:
oxyalion. NO decompositbn. and NO recHjchi^tk uiHt !>vdro-
f^'''\ Hems cited as "Not Ava3ab!e rfHS" a^e fcrted as a service So the reader. ,


^ i\i-- ^ Prepared by ttw Naiio>Kii Technical Informatfon Se
^ ^.^..e--^^^^
rvice
fifaiion. Springnefd. VA 22161 (703) 487-46SG
     The cost is only $160 per year
($225 outside the U.S., Canada, and Mexico).
    To subscribe, call (703) 487-4630.

-------
  United States
  Environmental Protection
"Agency
Center for Environmental Research
Information
Cincinnati OH 45268
 Official Business
 Penalty for Private Use,  $300
                                                                 Please make all necessary changes on the above label,
                                                                 detach or copy, and return to the address in the upper
                                                                 left-hand corner.

                                                                 If you do not wish to receive these reports CHECK HERE Q.
                                                                 detach, or copy this cover, and return to the address in the
                                                                 upper left-hand corner.
                                                               EPA/540/8-91/014
                                                                                             on RwycW Pojw
                                                                                                                 PB-S60
                                                                                                                   10*4
                                                                                  iiii  HI,

-------