United States
Environmental Protection
Agency
Office of Emergency and
Remedial Response
Washington, DC 20460
EPA/54O/8-S1/O14 *
Publication 9200.7-02D
November 1994
Superfund
CATALOG OF
SUPERFUND PROGRAM
INFORMATION PRODUCTS
-------
Invites You
TO VIEW THE NEW SUPERFUND EARLY BIRD
ANNOUNCEMENT WINDOW ON FEDWORLD(
The National Technical Information Service (NTIS) has joined forces with EPA to ensure that
citizen requests for Superfund information are filled rapidly and at the lowest possible cost.
NTIS is the repository of technical publications for the federal government, the largest single source
for public access to federally produced information, and is equipped to reproduce and distribute
publications on a document-by-document or on a standing order basis. All publicly available
Superfund documents from the Office of Emergency and Remedial Response (OERR) can now
be obtained through NTIS.
The Superfund Early Bird Announcement Window allows you to view a listing of Superfund
documents as soon as they are available. It provides abstracts as well as pricing and
ordering information for each item. In order to keep you current, the Window is updated monthly.
The documents are organized so you can quickly and easily access the information you need most:
• Introduction (general information)
• New Documents (listed alphabetically)
• Current Documents (listed alphabetically)
• Information On How To Obtain A Listing And
• Ordering Information For The National Priorities List Sites (by state)
Complete List Of RODs (Records Of Decision - listed by state and then alphabetically by site name)
To connect to FedWorld®: set modem parity to NONE, Data Bits to 8, and Stop Bit to 1 (M-8-1 );
set terminal emulation to ANSI. FedWorld accommodates speeds up to 9600 baud.
To connect to FedWorld through the Internet, telnet to: fedworld.gov. Once you have reached
the main menu, choose "Q" for Quick Bulletins and then type "J" for the Superfund Early Bird
Announcement Window.
-------
EPA/540/8-91/014
Publication 9200.7-02D
November 1994
SUPERFUND PROGRAM
INFORIVIATION PRODUCTS
1994
Office of Emergency and Remedial Response
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Washington, DC 20460
-------
NTIS & EPA
The National Technical Information Service (NTIS),
in cooperation with the Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA), distributes the fact sheets, directives,
and technical publications needed to respond to
Superfund legislation and makes them available
automatically, as they are issued, weeks before
they are formally announced.
Superfund material is available in the following
seven standing order subscriptions:
• Program Policies and Administration
• Environmental Response and Health and Safety
• Removals and Emergency Response
• Site Assessment and Remediation
• Technology and Analytical Services
• Enforcement
• Records of Decision
An NTIS Deposit Account is easy to acquire.
Call (703) 487-4650 for details.
-------
Title Page i
About NTIS and EPA , v
NTIS Products vi
How to Order vjj
Sample Entry Viil
Administrative and Management
CERCLIS , 1
Contracting and Contracts Integrity 3
Docket and Program Management 15
Planning and Program Management , 15
Special Reports ; 23
Program Implementation
Assessment and Listing 57
Compliance with Other Laws 69
Community Relations, State and Local, Tag Grants 77
Enforcement 86
Federal Facilities , 167
Field Health and Safety 168
Oil Spill and Spill Management 172
Public Information and Outreach 174
QA/QC Laboratory Program 182
Removal Program Management 186
Risk Management 189
RI/FS and RODS Process 202
RD/RA 209
RQ's and Continuous Release 213
Treatability Studies 215
103 (c) 219
Technology Policy and Administration
Conference Proceedings 222
Electronic Tools 222
Miscellaneous Policy and Program Documents 222
III
-------
Technology Program Implementation
Air Technologies 263
Bioremediation Technologies 274
Groundwater Technologies 276
Incineration and Thermal Technologies 286
Soil Cleanup Technologies 289
Solidification Technologies 302
Surface Water and Sludge Treatment Technologies 308
Indexes
Subject Index SU-1
Number Index NU-1
Price Schedules PC
Order forms OF
IV
-------
ABOUT NTIS AND EPA
National Technical Information Service
The National Technical Information Service (NTIS) is a self-
supporting agency within the U.S. Department of Commerce
where scientific, technical, engineering and business-related
information generated by the U.S. government and foreign
sources is collected and made available for purchase by the
general public. As such, NTIS is a partner to the Environ-
mental Protection Agency for the distribution of its reports .
which are publicly releasable.
The NTIS collection, which contains more than 2.2 million
reports and grows by nearly 1,500 titles each week, includes
information on current technologies, business and manage-
ment studies, and international market research. Additional
findings are available in the fields of energy, health and so-
cial sciences.
As a key participant in the development of advanced infor-
mation products and services, NTIS is able to provide its
reports in various formats in addition to paper copy and mi-
crofiche. Much of the collection can be supplied in electronic
formats including datafiles on tape, datafiles on diskette, soft-
ware programs on tape, software programs on diskette, titles
on CD-ROM, audiovisuals, slide sets and multimedia kits.
Although a federal agency within the Technology Adminis-
tration of the U.S. Department of Commerce, NTIS is unique
in that it does not receive tax-payer support from Congress.
Instead, operating costs must be recovered from the sale of
its products and services.
The EPA-NTIS Partnership
Superfund is the federal program that protects people and
the environment by cleaning up abandoned or uncontrolled
hazardous waste sites. It was established by Congress in
1980 in response to the growing concern over health and
environmental risks posed by these sites. Administered
nationwide by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
(EPA) and its 10 regional offices, it works in cooperation
with individual states and tribal governments. Cleanup ac-
tivities are funded either by the parties responsible for con-
tamination, or by the Superfund Trust Fund, derived from a
tax on the chemical and petroleum industries.
Since the program's inception, EPA has studied thousands
of hazardous waste sites and gained extensive experience
in technologies associated with successful removal or re-
mediation. This experience is documented in scores of pro-
gram guidances and technical manuals, fact sheets, soft-
ware and explanatory documents. Production of these prod-
ucts has made the Office of Emergency and Remedial Re-
sponse (OERR), Superfund's home office in EPA, a larger
publishing enterprise than many private sector publishers.
Disseminating this information to program participants who
include states, local and tribal governments, private con-
tracting firms, potentially responsible parties, law firms, and
citizens groups is a daunting task.
In 1991, The National Technical Information Service (NTIS)
joined in a partnership with EPA under which it serves as
the public clearinghouse for access to this collection, en-
suring that requests for these products are filled rapidly and
at the lowest possible cost. NTIS is the repository of techni-
cal publications for the federal government, and is the larg-
est single source for public access to federally produced
information. It is equipped to reproduce and distribute pub-
lications on demand, or on a standing order basis.
The partnership streamlines public access to Superfund
publications, and ensures timely, cost-effective production
of top-quality products. In keeping with the new emphasis
on streamlining government, the partnership has enabled
EPA to fully dedicate its resources to Superfund's mission
of hazardous site cleanup.
-------
NTIS PRODUCTS
NTIS ALERT
NTIS Alerts are available in two subscription formats: prepackaged and
customized.
Prepackaged subscriptions cover the latest developments and information
resources in board subject areas. NTIS prepares prepackaged subscriptions in
the subjects listed below. All are published twice a month. For a price list and
sample copies, please write to Subscriptions, NTIS, Springfield, VA 22161 or
call 703-487-4630.
• Agriculture & Food
• Astronomy & Astrophysics
• Biomedical Technology & Human
Factors Engineering
• Building Industry Technology
• Business & Economics
• Civil Engineering
• Combustion, Engines & Propellants
• Communication
• Computers, Control & Information
Theory
• Detection & Countermeasures
• Electrotechnology
• Energy
• Environmental Pollution & Control
• Government Inventions for
Licensing
• Health Care
• Library & Information Sciences
• Manufacturing Technology
> Materials Sciences
• Mathematical Sciences
• Navigation, Guidance & Control
• Ocean Technology & Engineering
• Ordnance
• Photography & Recording Devices
• Regional & Urban Planning &
Technology
• Space Technology
• Transportation
Customized Alerts are also offered that focus on specific topics. You can choose
from nearly 200 different topics, ideal for staying current in a highly specialized
area of interest. Or, combine several topics to tailor a subscription to your exact
need for information. Twice a month, your customized set of topical search
criteria will be run against the newest NTIS studies and research reports. Sum-
maries of pertinent material will be assembled into one custom Alert, prepared
just for you. For complete information on Custom NTIS Alerts please write to
Subscriptions, NTIS, Springfield, VA22161 or call 703-487-4630 and request
PR-797.
SELECTED
RESEARCH IN
MICROFICHE (SRIM)
SRIM is a tailored information service that automatically delivers microfiche cop-
ies of complete reports. You design your own subscription parameters, choos-
ing from more than 350 topics. You than receive all the actual documents in
microfiche at the same time they are being announced in other NTIS information
products. Subject indexes are also available for SRIM. These cumulative in-
dexes are unique to each customer and give ready reference to all of the micro-
fiche received within a calendar year. For complete information on NTIS SRIM,
please write to Subscriptions, NTIS, Springfield, VA 22161 or call 703-487-4630
and request PR-271.
A VARIETY OF
PRODUCT FORMATS
The NTIS collection is not limited to printed reports and documents.
Many printed reports and documents are also available on microfiche. NTIS
provides datafiles and software program products! in electronic formats on tape
and floppy diskette, as well as some titles on CD-ROM.
VI
-------
How to Order
How to order a document from NTIS:
1« Locate the NTIS order number and Price code for
a document
0001 CERCLISCharacterization Project: National Results
Order numba£gJ92-963331 QDJEDPrice PC A06/MF
Environmental Protection ^jenc&Washington, D.C. Office 6?
gency and Remedial Response;
The report, which is one in a series providingTnfotmation on the
nature of the sites being evaluated by the SuperfuncfStte^ssessment
program, characterizes a sample of national sites in CERCtT
Separate reports are available for the ten EPA regions.
Specification: Paper copy available on Standing Order, deposit
account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada, and Mexico;
all others $400). Single copies also available in paper copy or
microfiche. 108p.
Subject index keyword: Hazardous materials, Sites, Assessments,
United States, Superfund, Comprehensive Environmental Response
Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA), CERCLA Information
Systems (CERCLIS).
ice code*
• NTIS order number
2. Either complete the order form in the back of the
directory or call NTIS at (703) 487-4650
*AII documents are listed with a price code. Schedules to convert the
codes into dollar amounts are provided at the back of the catalog.
VII
-------
Sample Entry
Title-
Reference number
NTIS order number
Summary -
Price code* •
Keywords -
§OOj>CERCLIS Characterization Project: National Results
rder number PB92-963331CDH, Price PO^AOg^MF A02
Environmental Protection Agency.Wasrflngton, D.C. Office of Emer-
gency and Remedial Respon^&rWov 91
The report, which ispperlffa series providing information on the nature
.of the sites bejng-evaluated by the Superfund site assessment pro-
gram.^gbar^cterizes a sample of national sites in CERCLIS. Separate
available for the ten EPA regions.
Specification: Paper copy available on Standing Order, deposit
account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada, and Mexico;
all others $400). Single copies also available in paper copy or micro-
fiche. 108p.
•Subject index keyword: Hazardous materials, Sites, Assessments,
United States, Superfund, Comprehensive Environmental Response
Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA), CERCLA Information
Systems (CERCLIS).
*AII documents are listed with a price code. Schedules to convert the
price codes into dollar amounts are provided at the back of the catalog.
VIII
-------
ADMINISTRATIVE & MANAGEMENT:
CERCLIS
0001 CERCLIS Characterization Project: National Results
Order Number PB92-963315CDH, price: PC A06/MF A02
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Nov 91
The report, which is one in a series providing information on
the nature of the sites being evaluated by the Superfund site
assessment program, characterizes a sample of national
sites in CERCLIS. Separate reports are available for the ten
EPA Regions.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 108p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Sites, As-
sessments, United States, Superfund, Comprehensive Envi-
ronmental Response Compensation and Liability
Act(CERCLA), CERCLA Information System(CERCLIS).
0002 CERCLIS Characterization Project: Region 1 Results
Order Number PB92-963316CDH, price: PC A05/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Nov 91
The publication is one in a series of reports providing infor-
mation on the nature of the sites being evaluated by the Su-
perfund site assessment program and characterizes a
sample of Regional sites in CERCLIS. National and Regional
NPL (National Priority List) characterization reports cover the
NPL characterization project, which provides a snapshot of
sites on the NPL as of February 1991.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 76p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Sites, As-
sessments, Superfund, CERCLA(Comprehensive Environ-
mental Response Compensation and Liability Act),
CERCLIS(CERCLA Information System).
0003 CERCLIS Characterization Project: Region 2 Results
Order Number PB92-963317CDH, price: PC A05/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Nov 91
The publication is one in a series of reports providing infor-
mation on the nature of the sites being evaluated by the Su-
perfund site assessment program and characterizes a
sample of Regional sites in CERCLIS. National and Regional
NPL (National Priorities List) characterization reports cover
the NPL characterization project, which provides a snapshot
of sites on the NPL as of February 1991.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 76p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Sites, As-
sessments, Superfund, CERCLA(Comprehensive Environ-
mental Response Compensation and Liability Act),
CERCLIS(CERCLA Information System).
0004 CERCLIS Characterization Project: Region 3 Results
Order Number PB92-963318CDH, price: PC A05/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Nov 91
The report, which is one in a series providing information on
the nature of the sites being evaluated by the Superfund site
assessment program, characterizes a sample of Region 3
sites in CERCLIS. Separate reports are available for the
other nine EPA Regions and for the nation as a whole.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 88p.
Subject! index keywords: Hazardous materials, Sites, As-
sessments, Superfund, Comprehensive Environmental Re-
sponse Compensation and Liability Act(CERCLA), CERCLA
Information System(CERCLIS).
0005 CERCLIS Characterization Project: Region 4 Results
Order Number PB92-963319CDH, price: PC A05/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Nov 91
The report, which is one in a series providing information on
the nature of the sites being evaluated by the Superfund site
assessment program, characterizes a sample of Region 4
sites in CERCLIS. Separate reports are available for the
other nine EPA regions and for the nation as a whole.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 80p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Sites, As-
sessments, Superfund, Comprehensive Environmental Re-
sponse Compensation and Liability Act(CERCLA), CERCLA
Information System(CERCLIS).
0006 CERCLIS Characterization Project: Region 5 Results
Order Number PB92-963320CDH, price: PC A05/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Nov 91
The report, which is one in a series providing information on
the nature of the sites being evaluated by the Superfund site
assessment program, characterizes a sample of Region 5
sites in CERCLIS. Separate reports are available for the
other nine EPA Regions and for the nation as a whole.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 80p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Sites, As-
sessments, Superfund, US EPA Region 5, Comprehensive
Environmental Response Compensation and Liability
Act(CERCLA), CERCLA Information System(CERCLIS).
0007 CERCLIS Characterization Project: Region 6 Results
Order Number PB92-963321CDH, price: PC A05/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Nov 91
The report, which is one in a series providing information on
the nature of the sites being evaluated by the Superfund site
assessment program, characterizes a sample of Region 6
-------
ADMINISTRATIVE & MANAGEMENT: CERCLIS
sites In CERCLIS. Separate reports are available for the
other nine EPA Regions and for the nation as a whole.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 80p.
Subject Index keywords: Hazardous materials, Sites, As-
sessments, Superfund, US EPA Region 6, Comprehensive
Environmental Response Compensation and Liability
Act(CERCLA), CERCLA Information System(CERCLIS).
0008 CERCLIS Characterization Project: Region 7 Results
Order Number PB92-963322CDH, price: PC A05/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Nov 91
The report, which is one in a series providing information on
the nature of the sites being evaluated by the Superfund site
assessment program, characterizes a sample of Region 7
sites in CERCLIS. Separate reports are available for the
other nine EPA Regions and for the nation as a whole.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 80p.
Subject Index keywords: Hazardous materials, Sites, As-
sessments, Superfund, US EPA Region 7, Comprehensive
Environmental Response Compensation and Liability
Act(CERCLA), CERCLA Information System(CERCLIS).
0009 CERCLIS Characterization Project: Region 8 Results
Order Number PB92-963323CDH, price: PC A05/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Nov 91
The report, which is one in a series providing information on
the nature of the sites being evaluated by the Superfund site
assessment program, characterizes a sample of Region 8
sites in CERCLIS. Separate reports are available for the
other nine EPA Regions and for the nation as a whole.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 80p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Sites, As-
sessments, Superfund, Comprehensive Environmental Re-
sponse Compensation and Liability Act(CERCLA), CERCLA
Information System(CERCLIS).
0010 CERCLIS Characterization Project: Region 9 Results
Order Number PB92-963324CDH, price: PC A05/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Nov 91
The report, which is one in a series providing information on
the nature of the sites being evaluated by the Superfund site
assessment program, characterizes a sample of Region 9
sites in CERCLIS. Separator reports are available for the
other nine EPA Regions and for the nation as a whole.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 80p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Sites, As-
sessments, Superfund, Comprehensive Environmental Re-
sponse Compensation and Liability Act(CERCLA), CERCLA
Information System(CERCLIS).
0011 CERCLIS Characterization Project: Region 10
Results
Order Number PB92-963325CDH, price: PC A05/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Nov 91
The report is one in a series providing information on the
nature of the sites being evaluated by the Superfund site as-
sessment program and characterizing a sample of sites in
CERCLIS. Separate reports are available for the other nine
EPA Regions and for the nation as a whole.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 80p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Sites, As-
sessments, Superfund, Comprehensive Environmental Re-
sponse Compensation and Liability Act(CERCLA), CERCLA
Information System(CERCLIS).
0012 CERCLIS (Comprehensive Environmental Response,
Compensation, and Liability Information System) Site
Location Extract
Order Number PB90-591310CDH, price: Subscription, call for
price
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; 1990
The file contains data on potentially hazardous waste sites
that have been reported to the Environmental Protection
Agency by States, Municipalities, Private companies and pri-
vate persons, pursuant to Section 103 of the Comprehensive
Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act
(CERCLA) of 1980, as amended. The file contains informa-
tion on the name and alias names, location, and indicators
for National Priority status and Federal Facility.
Specifications: Source tape is in the EBCDIC character set.
This restricts preparation to 9 track, one-half inch tape only.
Identify recording mode by specifying density only. For price
at 6250 bpi density, call NTIS Computer Products. Price in-
clude documentation, PB90-215120. Available on subscrip-
tion, NAG price $880/yr; individual issue $220; all others
write for quote. Issued quarterly. Supersedes PB88-914800.
See also PB90-591300.
Subject index keywords: Data file, Hazardous materials,
Waste disposal, Sites.
0013 CERCLIS Data Handling Support Policy Statement
Order Number PB90-258328CDH, price: PC A01/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; 30 May 90
The directive updates the policy statement published on
March 31, 1986, regarding management of the data handling
support contract for CERCLIS. The update contains no major
changes in policy, but rather presents the information in ac-
cordance with the current document management standards.
Specifications: 5p.
Subject index keywords!: Regulations, Project management,
Documentation, Contract administration, Superfund, Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response.
-------
ADMINISTRATIVE & MANAGEMENT: Contracting &
Contracts Integrity
0014 CERCLIS Listing
Order Number PB91-921348CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; 5 Feb 90
The directive discusses ways to assure rapid entry into the
Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and
Liability Information System (CERCLIS) of locations identified
to or by the Agency as potential hazardous waste release
sites. The directive re-emphasizes the use of the Preliminary
Assessment Petition and provides a copy of the public edu-
cational bulletin, 'Preliminary Assessment Petition.'
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $150 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $300). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 7p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
Hazardous materials, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
Response, Preliminary Assessment Petition.
0015 CERCLIS - WasteLAN - CleanLAN
Order Number PB91-921316CDH, price: PC A01/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Apr 91
CERCLIS, WasteLAN and CleanLAN information manage-
ment systems are an integral component of the Superfund
program site planning and management structure and
progress reporting. These three integrated systems provide
information for Superfund regional program and project man-
agement as well as reporting activities to EPA management,
Congress, USAGE and the public.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $150 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $300). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 3p.
Subject index keywords: Program management, Informa-
tion systems, Hazardous materials, Superfund, Comprehen-
sive Environmental Response Compensation and Liability Act
of 1980.
ADMINISTRATIVE & MANAGEMENT:
Contracting & Contracts Integrity
0016 Abstracts of Phase 1 and Phase 2 Awards: Small
Business Innovation Research Program 1991
Order Number PB94-146495CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Research and Development; Feb 92
Contents: 1991 Phase I abstracts (Drinking water treatment;
Municipal and industrial waste water treatment and pollution
control; Biological sludge treatment for improved handling
and disposal; Solid and hazardous waste disposal; In situ
treatment technologies for hazardous and toxic waste at Su-
perfund sites; Innovative restoration technologies removing
heavy metals at Superfund sites; Control of acid rain precur-
sors; Air pollution control; Waste reduction and pollution pre-
vention; and, Oil spill prevention cleanup, and restoration
technology) and 1991 Phase II abstracts (Municipal and in-
dustrial waste water treatment and pollution control; Solid
and hazardous waste disposal; Control of acid rain precur-
sors; Air pollution control; Waste reduction and pollution pre-
vention; and, Oil spill prevention, cleanup, and restoration
technology).
Specifications: 31 p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Research' projects,
SBIR(Small Business Innovative Research).
0017 Administrative Guidance for the FIT to ARCS (FIT/
ARCS) Transition
Order Number PB92-963332CDH, price: PC A06/MF A02
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; 29 Nov 91
The report describes the final administrative guidance for
managing pre-remedial, site assessment work under the Al-
ternative Remedial Contracting Strategy (ARCS) contracts.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 113p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Pollution
control, Project management, Superfund.
0018 Approval of Long Term Contracting Strategy for
Superfund (Superfund Management Review:
Recommendation E.2)
Order Number PB90-273822CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; 31 Aug 90
The directive summarizes the issues, findings, analysis and
recommendations for the Superfund Long-Term Contracting
Strategy which was developed to analyze the long-term con-
tract needs of the Superfund Program and to design a port-
folio of Superfund contracts to meet those needs over the
next ten years.
Specifications: 42p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Project
management, Contracts, Superfund, Management reviews,
Waste management, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
Response.
0019 ARCS (Alternative Remedial Contract Strategy)
Contracts Users' Manual
Order Number PB90-108549CDH, price: PC A05/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Aug 89
The handbook provides guidance for EPA Regional person-
nel with responsibility for management and administration of
Alternative Remedial Contract Strategy (ARCS) contracts.
The ARCS is EPA's approach to obtaining project manage-
ment and technical services to support remedial response
activities at National Priorities List sites. Guidance is provided
on contractor start-up, operational functions and a manage-
ment plan for multi-regional ARCS contracts.
Specifications: 90p.
Subject! index keywords: Regional planning, Contract ad-
ministration, Hazardous materials, Waste disposal, Alterna-
tive Remedial Contract Strategy, Remedial response, Super-
fund program.
0020 AFICS Construction Contract Modification
Procedures
Order Number PB90-274515CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 89
The fact sheet describes the contracting relationships, tech-
nical reviews, and administrative procedures required to
-------
ADMINISTRATIVE & MANAGEMENT: Contracting &
Contracts Integrity
process supplemental agreements and change orders for
changed work in Remedial Action construction projects
which are subcontracts under EPA's ARCS contracts.
Specifications: 9p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Construction
management, Superfund, Waste management, Office of Solid
Waste and Emergency Response, Remedial action.
0021 ARCS Work Assignment Management: Field Guide
Order Number PB91-214965CDH, price: PC A07/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Jan 89
The ARCS Work Assignment management Field Guide is
one of the three management-assistance tools currently
available to help RPMs in carrying out their ARCS work as-
signment management duties. The guide is designed specifi-
cally for RPMs to provide them with quick reference informa-
tion on the initiation and management of ARCS work assign-
ments.
Specifications: 131 p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
Hazardous materials, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
Response, Alternative Remedial Contract Strategy.
0022 Congressional Limits for FY 92 Alternative Remedial
Contracting Strategy (ARCS) Program Management
Costs
Order Number PB92-963260CDH, price: PC A01/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; 16 Mar 92
The directive transmits Congressionally mandated targets
and reporting requirements for ARCS contracts Program
Management costs.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 2p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
Hazardous materials, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
Response.
0023 Contracting and Subcontracting Guide to the
Superfund Program
Order Number PB92-963274CDH, price: PC Free
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; May 92
The document assists those interested in providing contrac-
tual services to the Superfund program, describes current
Superfund contracts and provides contact points, addresses,
and telephone numbers of firms with Superfund contracts.
Specifications: Supersedes PB89-233431. 74p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Contract ad-
ministration, Subcontracts, Pollution control, Superfund.
0024 Emergency Response Cleanup Services Contracts
(ERGS). Users Manual
Order Number PB90-191966CDH, price: PC A10/MF A02
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Oct 87
The report provides information to assist EPA Headquarters
and Regional personnel, and personnel from other Federal
agencies (e.g., U.S. Coast Guard) authorized to use the
ERGS contracts efficiently and effectively. In addition, the
users' manual discusses coordinating the use of the ERGS
contracts with other entities involved with the Superfund pro-
gram.
Specifications: 21 Op.
Subject index keywords: Emergencies, Hazardous materi-
als, Contract administration, Cleanup.
0025 Guidance for Organizing ARCS Contract Files
Order Number PB91-215020CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 3 Jan 89
The directive provides instructions to the Regions for devel-
opment of a consistent, yet flexible filing system for organiz-
ing and managing ARCS Contract files.
Specifications: 10p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
Hazardous materials, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
Response. ;
0026 Guidance on Program Management Activities under
ARCS
Order Number PB93-963280CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 11 Feb 93
The directive provides guidance on the division of program
management costs into administrative support costs and
technical cleanup costs and the development of guidance on
cost management activities.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 24p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
Hazardous materials, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
Response.
0027 Guidelines for Effective Management of the
Contract Laboratory Program
Order Number PB90-272568CDH, price: PC A01/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Nov 89
The fact sheet provides guidance to Superfund Headquarters
Project Officers (POs) arid Regional deputy Project Officers
(DPOs). The PO and DPO roles, responsibilities, limitations,
and interrelationships with other supporting parties are de-
fined for every stage of the Superfund process.
Specifications: See also PB90-191545. 4p.
Subject index keywords: Project management, Superfund,
Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response, Contract
Laboratory Program.
0028 Guidelines for Effective Management of the
Contract Laboratory Program. Part 1. Contract Award.
Part 2. Contract Administration
Order Number PB90-191545CDH, price: PC A15/MF A02
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Nov 89
Provides internal guidelines for Superfund Project Officers in
procuring, administering, managing CLP contracts.
Specifications: 346p.
Subject index keywords;: Laboratories, Superfund program,
Contract Laboratory Program.
-------
ADMINISTRATIVE & MANAGEMENT: Contracting &
Contracts Integrity
0029 Headquarters Support Contract Management
Procedures
Order Number PB91-921335CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; 15 Nov 89
The directive addresses two areas: (1) perceptions that may
weaken public confidence in the Superfund program and its
use of these contracts; and (2) procedures designed to
strengthen controls and effectiveness in the management of
the contracts. It is not all inclusive but provides information
to be applied to OERR work assignments.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $150 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; ail others $300). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 23p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
Hazardous materials, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
Response.
0030 Implementation of the Alternative Remedial
Contracting Strategy (ARCS) Task Force
Recommendations: Transmittal of the Implementation
Plan
Order Number PB92-963258CDH, price: PC A01/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; 22 Jan 92 .
The memorandum transmits the Implementation Plan for the
recommendations embodied in the Alternative Remedial
Contracting Strategy (ARCS) Task Force Report.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 5p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Pollution
control, Contract administration, Superfund.
0031 Implementation of the Decentralized Contractor
Performance Evaluation and Award Fee Process for
Selected Remedial Program Contracts
. Order Number PB91-205492CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 9 Mar 87
The directive is intended to: (1) further develop Regional in-
frastructures for managing contracts in advance of imple-
mentation of the Alternative Remedial Contracts Strategy
(ARCS); (2) effect the Agency's policy of decentralizing Su-
perfund activities to the Regions, consistent with other pro-
gram delegations; (3) focus accountability for contractor per-
formance monitoring on the individuals who are responsible
for site specific Program operations; (4) allow those most fa-
miliar with a contractor's performance and determine the
amount of fee to be awarded; and (5) increase communica-
tion between Agency and contractor personnel at all oper-
ational and management levels. The Standard Operating Pro-
cedure (SOP) defines the roles and responsibilities of key
Regional, Headquarters, and Contractor personnel and de-
fines the basic structure and operation of the award fee
process, as well as establishes minimum requirements for
contractor performance evaluations and award fee decisions.
Specifications: 14p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
Hazardous materials, Remedial action, Office of Solid Waste
and Emergency Response.
0032 Implementation of the Superfund Alternative
Remedial Contracting Strategy (ARCS): Report of the
Administrator's Task Force. Implementation Plan
Order Number PB92-963201CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; 27 Nov 91
The report includes results of a Task Force analysis of the
criticism the EPA received about the management of the Su-
perfund contracting program. EPA was accused of allowing
Superfund contractors to spend an inordinate amount of
public funds on activities other than the direct clean-up of
contaminated sites. The document provides a summary of
recommendations, strategies and proposed milestones to im-
plement.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 32p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Project
management, Pollution control, Superfund.
0033 Initiatives to Streamline the Alternative Remedial
Contracting Strategy (ARCS) Contracts' Award Fee
Process
Order Number PB93-963275CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 4 Sep 92
The directive delineates changes to the Alternative Remedial
Contracting Strategy (ARCS) award fee process which will
streamline the system for evaluating contractors' perform-
ance.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 32p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
Hazardous materials, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
Response, Alternative Remedial Contracting Strategy.
0034 Inorganic Contract Compliance Screening System
(ICCSS) Software (for Microcomputers)
Order Number PB90-591700CDH, price: Standing Order, call
for price
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; 12 Feb 90
Inorganic Contract Compliance Screening System (ICCSS)
software is a version of a mainframe-based application de-
veloped for the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's Na-
tional Contract Laboratory Program (CLP). ICCSS is designed
to automate the determination of contractural compliance
and completeness of data submitted to the EPA under the
Routine Analytical Services (RAS) programs of CERCLA
(Comprehensive Emergency Response Clean-up and Liability
Act) and SARA (Superfund Amendments and Reauthoriza-
tion Act). In order to remain consistent with the mainframe
system, the PC version of ICCSS is written in SAS and re-
quires that SAS/PC be installed on the host PC. It will load
analytical data from diskettes into SAS file format, perform
technical edits on data, produce technical defect and sum-
mary reports, and reproduce forms which contain defects. In
addition, ICCSS includes software to assist in identifying
these critical structural defects in the data format, to assist in
identifying these for correction prior to performing technical
-------
ADMINISTRATIVE & MANAGEMENT: Contracting &
Contracts integrity
edits. The 3/90 version of ICCSS software is applicable to
structural and technical checking of diskette data in either
format A or B for inorganic analysis under the CLP RAS 2/88
Statement of Work (SOW)...Software Description: The pro-
gram is written in the SAS programming language for imple-
mentation on an IBM/AT.PS/2 or compatible microcomputer
using MS DOS 3.3 operating system.
Specifications: The software is contained on 5 1/4-inch dis-
kettes, high density (1.2M), compatible with the IBM PC
microcomputer. The diskettes are in the ASCII format. Price
includes documentation, PB90-213836. Available on Stand-
ing Order, Deposit Account required. North American Conti-
nent price $200.00; all others write for quote. 1 diskette.
Subject index keywords: Software, Contract administration,
Monitoring, Comprehensive Emergency Response Clean-up
and Liability Act(CERCLA), Superfund Amendments and Re-
authorization Act(SARA).
0035 Inorganic Contract Compliance Screening System
(ICCSS) Software for the PC (Version 3/90) User Manual
Order Number PB90-213836CDH, price: PC A07/MF A01
Viar and Co., Alexandria, VA. Management Services Div.;
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Feb 90
The document is the user manual for Inorganic Contract
Compliance Screening System (ICCSS) software. ICCSS
software is a version of a mainframe-based application de-
veloped for the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's Na-
tional Contract Laboratory Program (CLP). ICCSS is designed
to automate the determination of contractual compliance and
completeness of data submitted to EPA under the Routine
Analytical Services (RAS) programs of CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Emergency Response Clean-up and Liability Act)
and SARA (Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization
Act). In order to remain consistent with the mainframe
system the PC version of ICCSS is written in SAS and re-
quires that SAS/PC be installed on the host PC. It will load
analytical data from diskettes into SAS file format, perform
technical edits on the data, produce technical defect and
summary reports, and reproduce forms which shows defects.
In addition, ICCSS includes software to detect critical struc-
tural defects in the data format, to assist in identifying these
for correction prior to performing technical edits. The 2/90
version of ICCSS software is applicable to structural and
technical checking of diskette data in either format A or B for
inorganic analysis under the CLP RAS 2/88 Statement of
Work (SOW).
Specifications: For system on diskette, see PB90-591700.
Sponsored by Environmental Protection Agency, Washington,
DC. Office of Emergency and Remedial Response. 138p.
Subject index keywords: Contract administration, Monitor-
ing, Comprehensive Emergency Response Clean-up and Li-
ability Act(CERCLA), Superfund Amendments and Reauthor-
ization Act(SARA).
0036 Inorganic Contract Compliance Screening System
(ICCSS) Software (ILM02.1 Version 2) (for
Microcomputers)
Order Number PB93-500288CDH, price: D02
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC.
Hazardous Site Evaluation Div; 1992
ICCSS software is a version of a mainframe-based applica-
tion developed for the U.S. Environmental Protection Agen-
cy's National Contract Laboratory Program (CLP). OCCSS is
designed to automate the determination of contractural com-
pliance and completeness of data submitted to the EPA
under the Routine Analytical Services (RAS) programs of
CERCLA (Comprehensive Environmental Response Compen-
sation and Liability Act). In order to remain consistent with
the mainframe system, the PC version of ICCSS is written in
SAS, and requires that SAS/PC be installed on the host PC.
It will load analytical data from diskettes into SAS file format,
perform technical edits on data, produce technical defect
and summary reports, arid reproduce forms which contain
defects. In addition, OCCSS includes software to assist in
identifying these critical structural defects in the data format,
to assist in identifying these for correction prior to performing
technical edits.
Specifications: The software is on one 51/4 inch diskette,
1.2M high density. File format: Executable Code. Documenta-
tion included; may be ordered separately as PB92-145598.
System: IBM AT/PS2, or compatible; MS DOS Version 3.3
operating system. Language: Base SAS. Supersedes PB92-
501519. Other formats available as PB93-500270 (OCCSS).
1 diskette.
Subject index keywords: Software, Waste management,
Analytical chemistry, Environmental surveys, Inorganic com-
pounds, Inorganic Contract Compliance Screening System.
0037 Inorganic Contract Compliance Screening System
(ICCSS) Software (ILM02.1 Version 3) (for
Microcomputers)
Order Number PB93-505352CDH, price: D02
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC.
Hazardous Site Evaluation Div; Apr 93
ICCSS software is a version of a mainframe-based applica-
tion developed for the U.S. Environmental Protection Agen-
cy's National Contract Laboratory Program (CLP). ICCSS is
designed to automate the determination of contractural com-
pliance and completeness of data submitted to the EPA
under the Routine Analytical Services (RAS) programs of
CERCLA (Comprehensive Emergency Response Clean-up
and Liability Act). In order to remain consistent with the
mainframe system, the PC version of ICCSS is written in
SAS, and requires that SAS/PC be installed on the host PC.
It will load analytical data from diskettes into SAS file format,
perform technical edits on data, produce technical defect
and summary reports, and reproduce forms which contain
defects. In addition, ICCSS includes software to assist in
identifying these critical structural defects in the data format,
to assist in identifying these for correction prior to performing
technical edits.
Specifications: The software is on one 51/4 inch diskette,
360K double density. File Format: Executable Code. Docu-
mentation included; may be ordered separately as PB92-
145598. System: IBM compatible; MS DOS operating
system. Language: Base SAS. Supersedes PB93-500288.
See also PB92-501519 and PB90-591700. 1 diskette.
Subject index keywords: Software, Waste management, In-
organic compounds, Analytical chemistry, Environmental sur-
veys, Inorganic Contract Compliance Screening System.
-------
ADMINISTRATIVE & MANAGEMENT: Contracting &
Contracts Integrity
0038 Inorganic Contract Compliance Screening System
(ICCSS) Software (ILM02.1 Version 4) (for
Microcomputers)
Order Number PB94-500642CDH, price: D02
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC.
Hazardous Site Evaluation Div; 1994
ICCSS software is a version of a mainframe-based applica-
tion developed for the U.S. Environmental Protection Agen-
cy's National Contract Laboratory Program (CLP). ICCSS is
designed to automate the determination of contractural com-
pliance and completeness of data submitted to the EPA
under the Routine Analytical Services (RAS) programs of
CERCLA (Comprehensive Emergency Response Clean-up
and Liability Act). In order to remain consistent with the
mainframe system, the PC version of ICCSS is written in
SAS, and requires that SAS/PC be installed on the host PC.
It will load analytical data from diskettes into SAS file format,
perform technical edits on data, produce technical defect
and summary reports, and reproduce forms which contain
defects. In addition, ICCSS includes software to assist in
identifying these critical structural defects in the data format,
to assist in identifying these for correction prior to performing
technical edits.
Specifications: The software is on one 5 1/4 inch diskette,
360K double density. File format: Executable code. Docu-
mentation included; may be ordered separately as PB92-
145598. System: IBM compatible; MS DOS operating
system, 585K. Language: Base SAS. 2MB. Hard disk with at
least 10 MB of available space. Printer with wide carriage or
ability to compress print. Other software which are memory
resident will use up base memory and should not be on the
same machine as ICCSS. SAS required, hot available NTIS.
Supersedes PB93-505352. See al. 1 diskette.
Subject index keywords: Software, Superfund, Contract
management.
0039 Inorganic Contract Compliance Screening System
(ICCSS) Software (ILM02.1 Version 5) (for
Microcomputers)
Order Number PB94-501467CDH, price: D02
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; 1994
ICCSS software is a version of a mainframe-based applica-
tion developed for the U.S. Environmental Protection Agen-
cy's National Contract Laboratory Program (CLP). ICCSS is
designed to automate the determination of contractural com-
pliance and completeness of data submitted to the EPA
under the Routine Analytical Services (RAS) programs of
CERCLA (Comprehensive Emergency Response Clean-up
and Liability Act). In order to remain consistent with the
mainframe system, this PC version of ICGSS is written in
SAS, and requires that SAS/PC be installed on the host PC.
It will load analytical data from diskettes into SAS file format,
perform technical edits on data, produce technical defect
and summary reports, and reproduce forms which contain
defects. In addition, ICCSS includes software to assist in
identifying these critical structural defects in the data format,
to assist in identifying these for correction prior to performing
technical edits.
Specifications: The software is on one 5 1/4 inch diskette,
360K double density. File format: Executable code. Docu-
mentation included; may be ordered separately as PB92-
145598. System: IBM Compatible; DOS operating system,
585K. Language: Base SAS. 2 mb of RAM with memory over
640K configured as expanded memory. Hard disk with at
least 10 mb of available space. Printer with wide carriage or
ability to compress print. Other software which are memory
resident will use up base memory and should not be on the
same machine as SAS required, not available NTIS. 1 dis-
kette. ,
Subject index keywords: Software, Inorganic compounds,
Superfund, Contract management.
0040 Inorganic Contract Compliance Screening System
(ICCSS) Software (SOW March 1990) (Version 1) (for
Microcomputers)
Order Number PB92-501519CDH, price: D02,
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Mar 90
ICCSS software is a version of a mainframe-based applica-
tion developed for the U.S. Environmental Protection Agen-
cy's National Contract Laboratory Program (CLP). ICCSS is
designed to automate the determination of contractural com-
pliance and completeness of data submitted to the EPA
under the Routine Analytical Services (RAS) programs of
CERCLA (Comprehensive Environmental Response Compen-
sation and Liability Act). In order to remain consistent with
the mainframe system, this PC version of ICCSS is written in
SAS, and requires that SAS/PC be installed on the host PC.
It will load analytical data from diskettes into SAS file format,
perform technical edits on data, produce technical defect
and summary reports, and reproduce forms which contain
defects. In addition, ICCSS includes software to assist in
identifying these critical structural defects in the data format,
to assist in identifying these for correction prior to performing
technical edits.
, Specifications: The software is on one (1) 5 1/4 inch dis-
kette, 1.2M high density File format: ASCII. Documentation
included; may be ordered separately as PB92-145598.
System: IBM AT/PS2, or compatible; MS DOS Version 3.3
operating system. Language: Base SAS. Supersedes PB90-
591700. 1 diskette.
Subject index keywords: Software, Analytical chemistry,
Environmental surveys, Inorganic compounds, Waste man-
agement, Inorganic Contract Compliance Screening System.
0041 Inorganic Contract Compliance Screening System
Software for the PC (SOW March 1990 Version 1). User
Manual
Order Number PB92-145598CDH, price: PC A07/MF A02,
Viar and Co., Alexandria, VA'. Environmental Services Div.;
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Mar 90
The Inorganic Contract Compliance Screening System
(ICCSS) software is a version of a mainframe-based applica-
tion developed for the U.S. Environmental Protection Agen-
cy's National Contract Laboratory Program (CLP). ICCSS is
designed to automate the determination of contractual com-
pliance and completeness of data submitted to EPA under
the Routine Analytical Services (RAS) programs of CERCLA
(Comprehensive Environmental Response Compensation
and Liability Act) and SARA (Superfund Amendments and
Reauthorization Act). The manual provides the user with in-
structions for running ICCSS software on the PC. Descrip-
tions of and instructions for each menu ^are detailed in the
following sections. The user should have a working knowl-
-------
ADMINISTRATIVE & MANAGEMENT: Contracting &
Contracts Integrity
edge of PC DOS prior to utilizing this system. The following
sections present the ICCSS operating environment, describe
system output (reports), provide instructions for running the
system and generating reports, and specify input data re-
quirements. Examples of reports are contained in Appendix
A. Appendix B contains descriptions of report defect codes
and text. Appendix C is a listing of defect statements by cri-
terion with associated SOW references. Data Format A from
the Inorganic RAS SOW (3/90) is included as Appendix D.
Since ICCSS PC software is implemented using Base SAS
Software, the 'SAS Language Guide for Personal Computers'
from The SAS Institute, Inc. in Gary, North Carolina may be
helpful.
Specifications: For system on diskette see, PB92-501519.
Sponsored by Environmental Protection Agency, Washington,
DC. Office of Emergency and Remedial Response. 143p.
Subject Index keywords: Analytical chemistry, Environmen-
tal surveys, Inorganic compounds, User manuals(Computer
programs), Waste management, Inorganic Contract Compli-
ance Screening System.
0042 Long-Term Contracting Strategy for Superfund
Order Number PB90-274275CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 90
The fact sheet provides a summary of the Superfund Long-
Term Contracting Strategy which was developed to analyze
the long-term contract needs of the Superfund program.
Specifications: 6p.
Subject Index keywords: Hazardous materials, Project
management, Contracts, Superfund, Waste management,
Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response.
0043 Long-Term Contracting Strategy for Superfund -
implementation
Order Number PB91-921358CDH, price: PC A01/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Jul 91
The memorandum clarifies the roles of the Advisory Commit-
tee and the Regions in implementing the Long-Term Con-
tracting Strategy for Superfund.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $150 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $300). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 3p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste treat-
ment, Superfund.
0044 Mentor-Protege Program
Order Number PB93-963251CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Oct 92
The document presents the conceptual framework and un-
derstanding of the Mentor-Protege Program being introduced
and developed within the Environmental Protection Agency
(EPA) to stimulate the participation of small disadvantaged
businesses in EPA contract requirements.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 10p.
Subject Index keywords: Contract administration, Small
businesses, Environmental Protection Agency.
0045 Model Performance Standards for Superfund
Project Officers, Deputy Project Officers, and Work
Assignment Managers/Delivery Order Officers
Order Number PB90-258336CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; 26 Sep 88
The directive provides model performance standards and
suggested weightings to be used by Regions in developing
individual performance requirements for personnel serving in
Superfund contract management positions.
Specifications: 19p.
Subject index keywords: Regulations, Project management,
Performance standards, Contract administration, Superfund,
Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response.
0046 OERR Organizational Conflict of Interest Review
and Approval Program (Superfund Management Review:
Recommendation No. 46C)
Order Number PB91-2149I57CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; 31 Oct 89
The directive transmits new procedures to eliminate organi-
zational conflicts of interest in work assignments under Su-
perfund Headquarters support contracts and to take appro-
priate steps to mitigate the perception of conflict wherever
possible.
Specifications: 12p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
Hazardous materials, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
Response.
0047 Organic Contract Compliance Screening System
(OCCSS) Software (for Microcomputers)
Order Number PB90-591690CDH, price: Standing Order, call
for price ;
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; 12 Feb 90
Organic Contract Compliance Screening System (OCCSS)
software is a version of a mainframe-based application de-
veloped for the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's Na-
tional Contract Laboratory Program (CLP). OCCSS is de-
signed to automate the determination of contractural compli-
ance and completeness of data submitted to the EPA under
the Routine Analytical Services (RAS) programs of CERCLA
(Comprehensive Emergency Response Clean-up and Liability
Act) and SARA (Superfund Amendments and Reauthoriza-
tion Act). In order to remain consistent with the mainframe
system, the PC version of OCCSS is written in SAS and re-
quires that SAS/PC be installed on the host PC. It will load
analytical data from diskettes into SAS file format, perform
technical edits on data, produce technical defect and sum-
mary reports, and reproduce forms which contain defects. In
addition, OCCSS includes software to assist in identifying
these critical structural defects in the data format, to assist in
identifying these for correction prior to performing technical
edits. The 2/90 version of OCCSS software is applicable to
structural and technical checking of diskette data in either
format A or B.for organic analysis under the CLP RAS 2/88
Statement of Work (SOW)...Software Description: The pro-
gram is written in the SAS programming language for imple-
mentation on an IBM/AT.PS/2 or compatible microcomputer
using MS DOS 3.3 operating system.
-------
ADMINISTRATIVE & MANAGEMENT: Contracting &
Contracts Integrity
Specifications: The software is contained on 5 1/4-inch dis-
kettes, high density (1.2M), compatible with the IBM PC
microcomputer. The diskettes are in the ASCII format. Price
includes documentation, PB90-213844. Available on Stand-
ing Order, Deposit Account required. North American Conti-
nent price $200.00; all others write for quote. Supersedes
PB89-944900. 1 diskette.
Subject index keywords: Software, Contract administration,
Monitoring, Comprehensive Emergency Response Clean-up
and Liability Act(CERCLA), Superfund Amendments and Re-
authorization Act(SARA).
0048 Organic Contract Compliance Screening System
(OCCSS) Software for the PC (Version 2/90) User Manual
Order Number PB90-213844CDH, price: PC A08/MF A01
Viar and Co., Alexandria, VA. Management Services Div.;
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Feb 90
The document is the user manual for Organic Contract Com-
pliance Screening System (OCCSS) software. OCCSS soft-
ware is a version of a mainframe-based application devel-
oped for the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's Nation-
. al Contract Laboratory Program (CLP). OCCSS is designed
to automate the determination of contractual compliance and
completeness of data submitted to EPA under the Routine
Analytical Services (RAS) programs of CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Emergency Response Clean-up and Liability Act)
and SARA (Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization
Act). In order to remain consistent with the mainframe
system the PC version of OCCSS is written in SAS and re-
quires that SAS/PC be installed on the host PC. It will load
analytical data from diskettes into SAS file format, perform
technical edits on the data, produce technical defect and
summary reports, and reproduce forms which show defects.
In addition, OCCSS includes software to detect critical struc-
tural defects in the data format, to assist in identifying these
for correction prior to performing technical edits. The 2/90
version of OCCSS software is applicable to structural and
technical checking of diskette data in either format A or B for
Organic analysis under the CLP RAS 2/88 Statement of
Work (SOW).
Specifications: Supersedes PB89-167951. For system on
diskette, see PB90-591690. Sponsored by Environmental
Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of Emergency
and Remedial Response. 167p.
Subject index keywords: Contract administration, Monitor-
ing, Comprehensive Emergency Response Clean-up and Li-
ability Act(CERCLA), Superfund Amendments and Reauthor-
ization Act(SARA).
0049 Organic Contract Compliance Screening System
(OCCSS) Software (OLM01.8 Version 2) (for
Microcomputers)
Order Number PB92-502202CDH, price: D02
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; 1992
OCCSS software is a version of a mainframe-based applica-
tion developed for the U.S. Environmental Protection Agen-
cy's National Contract Laboratory Program (CLP). OCCSS is
designed to automate the determination of contractural com-
pliance and completeness of data submitted to the EPA
under the Routine Analytical Services (RAS) programs of
CERCLA (Comprehensive Emergency Response Compensa-
tion and Liability Act). In order to remain consistent with the
mainframe system, this PC version of OCCSS is written in
SAS, and requires that SAS/PC be installed on the host PC.
It will load analytical data from diskettes into SAS file format,
perform technical edits on data, produce technical defect
and summary reports, and reproduce forms which contain
defects. In addition, OCCSS includes software to assist in
identifying these critical structural defects in the data format,
to assist in identifying these for correction prior to performing
technical edits.
Specifications: The software is on one (1) 5 1/4 inch dis-
kette, 1.2M high density. File format: ASCII. Documentation
included; may be ordered separately as PB92-169564.
System: IBM AT/PS2 or compatible; MS DOS Version 3.3
operating system. Language: Base SAS. Supercedes PB92-
501535. Other formats available as PB92-501519 (ICCSS). 1
diskette.
Subject index keywords: Software, Pollution regulations,
Organic compounds, Waste management, Organic Contract
Compliance Screening System.
0050 Organic Contract Compliance Screening System
(OCCSS) Software (OLM01.8 Version 3) (for
Microcomputers)
Order Number PB93-500270CDH, price: D02
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC.
Hazardous Site Evaluation Div; 1992
OCCSS software is a version of a mainframe-based applica-
tion developed for the U.S. Environmental Protection Agen-
cy's National Contract Laboratory Program (CLP). OCCSS is
designed to automate the determination of contractural com-
pliance and completeness of data submitted to the EPA
under the Routine Analytical Services (RAS) programs of
CERCLA (Comprehensive Environmental Response Compen-
sation and Liability Act). In order to remain consistent with
the mainframe system, the PC version of OCCSS is written in
SAS, and requires that SAS/PC be installed on the host PC.
It will load analytical data from diskettes into SAS file format,
perform technical edits on data, produce technical defect
and summary reports, and reproduce forms which contain
defects. In addition, OCCSS includes software to assist in
identifying these critical structural defects in the data format,
to assist in identifying these for correction prior to performing
technical edits.
Specifications: The software is on one 51/4 inch diskette,
1.2M high density. File format: Executable Code. Documenta-
tion included; may be ordered separately as PB92-169564.
System: IBM AT/PS2 or compatible; MS DOS Version 3.3
operating system. Language: Base SAS. Supersedes PB92-
502202. See also PB92-501501 (SOW 2/88/Vers. 6/90),
and PB92-501527 (SOW 3/90). Other formats available as
PB93-500288 (ICCSS). 1 diskette.
Subject index keywords: Software, Environmental surveys,
Organic compounds, Waste management, Analytical chemis-
try, Organic Contract Compliance Screening System.
0051 Organic Contract Compliance Screening System
(OCCSS) Software (OLM01.8 Version 4) (for
Microcomputers)
Order Number PB93-505345CDH, price: D02
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC.
Hazardous Site Evaluation Div; Apr 93
OCCSS software is a version of a mainframe-based applica-
tion developed for the U.S. Environmental Protection Agen-
-------
ADMINISTRATIVE & MANAGEMENT: Contracting &
Contracts Integrity
cy's National Contract Laboratory Program (CLP). OCCSS is
designed to automate the determination of contractual com-
pliance and completeness of data submitted to the EPA
under the Routine Analytical Services (RAS) programs of
CERCLA (Comprehensive Emergency Response Clean-up
and Liability Act). In order to remain consistent with the
mainframe system, the PC version of OCCSS is written in
SAS, and requires that SAS/PC be installed on the host PC.
It will load analytical data from diskettes into SAS file format,
perform technical edits on data, produce technical defect
and summary reports, and reproduce forms which contain
defects. In addition, OCCSS includes software to assist in
identifying these critical structural defects in the data format,
to assist in Identifying these for correction prior to performing
technical edits.
Specifications: The software is on one 51/4 inch diskette,
1.2M high density. Rle format: Executable Code. Documenta-
tion included; may be ordered separately as PB92-169564.
System: IBM AT / PS2 or compatible; MS DOS Version 3.3
operating system. Language: Base SAS. Supersedes PB93-
500270. See also PB92-501535 and PB92-502202. 1 dis-
kette.
Subject index keywords: Software, Superfund, Solid waste
management, OCCSS(Organic Contract Compliance Screen-
ing System).
0052 Organic Contract Compliance Screening System
(OCCSS) Software (OLM01.8 Version 5) (for
Microcomputers)
Order Number PB93-506053CDH, price: D02
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC.
Hazardous Site Evaluation Div; Jul 93
OCCSS software is a version of a mainframe-based applica-
tion developed for the U.S. Environmental Protection Agen-
cy's National Contract Laboratory Program (CLP). OCCSS is
designed to automate the determination of contractural com-
pliance and completeness of data submitted to the EPA
under the Routine Analytical Services (RAS) programs of
CERCLA (Comprehensive Emergency Response Clean-up
and Liability Act). In order to remain consistent with the
mainframe system, the PC version of OCCSS is written in
SAS, and requires that SAS/PC be installed on the host PC.
It will load analytical data from diskettes into SAS file format,
perform technical edits on data, produce technical defect
and summary reports, and reproduce forms which contain
defects. In addition, OCCSS includes software to assist in
identifying these critical structural defects in the data format,
to assist in identifying these for correction prior to performing
technical edits.
Specifications: The software is one 5 1/4 inch diskette,
1.2M high density. Rle format: Executable code. Documenta-
tion included; may be ordered separately as PB92-169564.
System: IBM AT/PS2 or compatible; MS DOS Version 3.3
operating system. Language: Base SAS. Supersedes PB93-
505345. 2 megabytes of RAM with memory over 640K con-
figured as expanded memory. Hard disk with at least 10 me-
gabytes of available space. Printer with wide carriage or abili-
ty to compress print. This application requires a minimum of
585K of base memory. 1 diskette.
Subject index keywords: Software, Pollution standards, Or-
ganic compounds, Superfund.
0053 Organic Contract Compliance Screening System
(OCCSS) Software (OLM01.8 Version 6) (for
Microcomputers)
Order Number PB94-501335CDH, price: D02
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Jan 94
OCCSS software is a version of a mainframe-based applica-
tion developed for the U.S. Environmental Protection Agen-
cy's National Contract Laboratory Program (CLP). OCCSS is
designed to automate the determination of contractural com-
pliance and completeness of data submitted to the EPA
under the Routine Analytical Services (RAS) programs of
CERCLA (Comprehensive Environmental Response Compen-
sation and Liability Act). In order to remain consistent with
the mainframe system, this PC version of OCCSS is written
in SAS, and requires that SAS/PC be installed on the host
PC. It will load analytical data from diskettes into SAS file
format, perform technical edits on data, produce technical
defect and summary reports, and reproduce forms which
contain defects. In addition, OCCSS includes software to
assist in identifying these critical structural defects in the
data format, to assist in identifying these for correction prior
to performing technical edits.
Specifications: The software is on one 51/4 inch diskette,
1.2M high density. File format: Executable code. Documenta-
tion included; may be ordered separately as PB92-169564.
System: IBM AT/PS2 or compatible; MS DOS Version 3.3
operating system. Language: Base SAS. 2MB of RAM with
memory over 640K configured as expanded memory. Hard
disk with at least 10MB of available space. Printer with wide
carriage or ability to compress print. Supersedes PB93-
506053. See also PB93-505352 and PB94-500642. 1 dis-
kette.
Subject index keywords: Software, Organic compounds,
Waste management, Contract management, Organic Con-
tract Compliance Screening System.
0054 Organic Contract Compliance Screening System
(OCCSS) Software (SOW February 1988) (for
Microcomputers)
Order Number PB92-501501CDH, price: D02
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Jun 90
OCCSS software is a version of a mainframe-based applica-
tion developed for the U.S. Environmental Protection Agen-
cy's National Contract Laboratory Program (CLP). OCCSS is
designed to automate the determination of contractual com-
pliance and completeness of data submitted to the EPA
under the Routine Analytical Services (RAS) programs of
CERCLA (Comprehensive Environmental Response Compen-
sation and Liability Act). In order to remain consistent with
the mainframe system, this PC version of OCCSS is written
in SAS, and requires that SAS/PC be installed on the host
PC. It will load analytical data from diskettes into SAS file
format, perform technical edits on data, produce technical
defect and summary reports, and reproduce forms which
contain defects. In addition, OCCSS includes software to
assist in identifying these critical structural defects in the
data format, to assist in identifying these for correction prior
to performing technical edits.
Specifications: The software is on one (1) 5 1/4 inch dis-
kette, 1.2M high density. File format: ASCII. Documentation
included; may be ordered separately as PB92-145580.
10
-------
ADMINISTRATIVE & MANAGEMENT: Contracting &
Contracts Integrity
System: IBM AT/PS2 or compatible; MS DOS Version 3.3
operating system. Language: Base SAS. 1 diskette.
Subject index keywords: Software, Organic compounds,
Environmental surveys, Waste management, Analytical
chemistry, Organic Contract Compliance Screening System.
0055 Organic Contract Compliance Screening System
(OCCSS) Software (SOW March 1990) (Version 1) (for
Microcomputers)
Order Number PB92-501527CDH, price: D02
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Mar 90
OCCSS software is a version of a mainframe-based applica-
tion developed for the U.S. Environmental Protection Agen-
cy's National Contract Laboratory Program (CLP). ICCSS is
designed to automate the determination of contractural com-
pliance and completeness of data submitted to the EPA
under the Routine Analytical Services (RAS) programs of
CERCLA (Comprehensive Environmental Response Compre-
hensive and Liability Act). In order to remain consistent with
the mainframe system, this PC version of OCCSS is written
in SAS, and requires that SAS/PC be installed on the host
PC. It will load analytical data from diskettes into SAS file
format, perform technical edits on data, produce technical
defect and summary reports, and reproduce forms which
contain defects. In addition, ICCSS includes software to
assist in identifying these criteria structural defects in the
data format, to assist in identifying these for correction prior
to performing technical edits.
Specifications: The software is on one (1) 5 1/4 inch dis-
kette, 1.2M high density. File format: ASCII. Documentation
included; may be ordered separately as PB92-145572.
System: IBM AT / PS2 or compatible; MS DOS Version 3.3
operating system. Language: Base SAS. 1 diskette.
Subject index keywords: Environmental surveys, Software,
Waste management, Organic compounds, Analytical chemis-
try, Organic Contract Compliance Screening System.
0056 Organic Contract Compliance Screening System
(OCCSS) Software (SOW OLM01.8 Version January 1992)
(Version 1) (for Microcomputers)
Order Number PB92-501535CDH, price: D02
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Jan 92
OCCSS software is a version of a mainframe-based applica-
tion developed for the U.S. Environmental Protection Agen-
cy's National Contract Laboratory Program (CLP). OCCSS is
designed to automate the determination of contractural com-
pliance and completeness of data submitted to the EPA
under the Routine Analytical Services (RAS) programs of
CERCLA (Comprehensive Environmental Response Compre-
hensive and Liability Act). In order to remain consistent with
the mainframe system, this PC version of OCCSS is written
in SAS, and requires that SAS/PC be installed on the host
PC. It will load analytical data from diskettes into SAS file
format, perform technical edits on data, produce technical
defect and summary reports, and reproduce forms which
contain defects. In addition, OCCSS includes software to
assist in identifying these critical structural defects in the
data format, to assist in identifying these for correction prior
to performing technical edits.
Specifications: The software is on one (1) 5 1/4 inch dis-
kette, 1.2M high density. File format: ASCII. Documentation
included; may be ordered separately as PB92-145564.
System: IBM AT / PS2 or compatible; MS DOS Version 3.3
operating system. Language: Base SAS. Supersedes PB90-
591690. Other formats available as PB92-501519 (ICCSS). 1
diskette.
Subject index keywords: Analytical chemistry, Environmen-
tal surveys, Organic compounds, Software, Waste manage-
ment, Organic Contract Compliance Screening System.
0057 Organic Contract Compliance Screening System.
Software for the PC (OLM01.8 Version 1). User Manual
Order Number PB92-145564CDH, price: PC A06/MF A02
Viar and Co., Alexandria, VA. Environmental Services Div.;
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Jan 92
The OCCSS software is a version of a mainframe-based ap-
plication developed for the EPA's National Contract Labora-
tory Program (CLP). OCCSS is designed to automate the de-
termination of contractual compliance and completeness of
data submitted to EPA under the RAS programs of CERCLA
(Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation,
and Liability Act) and SARA (Superfund Amendments and
Reauthorization Act). The manual provides the user with in-
structions for running OCCSS software on the PC. Descrip-
tions of and instructions for each menu are detailed in the
following sections. The user should have a working knowl-
edge of PC DOS prior to utilizing this system. The following
sections present the OCCSS operating environment, de-
scribe system output (reports), provide instructions for run-
ning the system and generating reports, and specify input
data requirements. Examples of reports are contained in Ap-
pendix A. Appendix B contains descriptions of sample suffix
codes and report defect codes. Appendix C is a listing of
defect statements by criterion, with associated SOW refer-
ences. Appendix D contains data file formats from Exhibit H
of the SOW. Since OCCSS PC software is implemented
using Base SAS Software, the 'SAS Language Guide for Per-
sonal Computers' from The SAS Institute, Inc. in Gary, North
Carolina may be helpful.
Specifications: For system on diskette see, PB92-501535.
Sponsored by Environmental Protection Agency, Washington,
DC. Office of Emergency and Remedial Response. 117p.
Subject index keywords: User manuals(Computer pro-
grams), Environmental surveys, Waste management, Analyti-
cal chemistry, Organic compounds, Organic Contract Compli-
ance Screening System.
0058 Organic Contract Compliance Screening System.
Software for the PC (OLM01.8 Version 2) (User Manual)
Order Number PB92-169564CDH, price: PC A06/MF A02
Viar and Co., Alexandria, VA. Environmental Services Div.;
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; 1992
The OCCSS software is a version of a mainframe-based ap-
plication developed for the EPA's National Contract Labora-
tory Program (CLP). OCCSS is designed to automate the de-
termination of contractual compliance and completeness of
data submitted to EPA under the RAS programs of CERCLA
(Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation,
and Liability Act) and SARA (Superfund Amendments and
Reauthorization Act). The manual provides the user with in-
structions for running OCCSS software on the PC. Descrip-
tions of and instructions for each menu are detailed in the
11
-------
ADMINISTRATIVE & MANAGEMENT: Contracting &
Contracts Integrity
following sections. The user should have a working knowl-
edge of PC DOS prior to utilizing the system.
Specifications: For system on diskette see PB92-502202.
Sponsored by Environmental Protection Agency, Washington,
DC. Office of Emergency and Remedial Response. 106p.
Subject index keywords: User manuals(Computer pro-
grams), Pollution regulations, Organic compounds, Waste
management, Organic Contract Compliance Screening
System.
0059 Organic Contract Compliance Screening System.
Software for the PC (SOW March 1990, Version 1). User
Manual
Order Number PB92-145572CDH, price: PC A08/MF A02
Viar and Co., Alexandria, VA. Environmental Services Div.;
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Mar 90
The Organic Contract Compliance Screening System
(OCCSS) software is a version of a mainframe-based appli-
cation developed for the U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency's National Contract Laboratory Program (CLP).
OCCSS is designed to automate the determination of con-
tractual compliance and completeness of data submitted to
EPA under the Routine Analytical Services (RAS) programs
of CERCLA (Comprehensive Environmental Response Com-
pensation and Liability Act) and SARA (Superfund Amend-
ments and Reauthorization Act). The manual provides the
user with instructions for running OCCSS software on the
PC. Descriptions of and instructions for each menu are de-
tailed in the following sections. The user should have a work-
ing knowledge of PC DOS prior to utilizing this system. The
following sections present the OCCSS operating environ-
ment, describe system output (reports), provide instructions
for running the system and generating reports, and specify
input data requirements. Examples of reports are contained
in Appendix A. Appendix B contains descriptions of sample
suffix codes and report defect codes. Appendix C is a listing
of defect statements by criterion with associated SOW refer-
ences. Data Format A and the Agency Standard from the Or-
ganic RAS SOW (3/90) are included as Appendix D. Since
OCCSS PC software is implemented using Base SAS Soft-
ware, the 'SAS Language Guide for Personal Computers'
from The SAS Institute, Inc. in Gary, North Carolina may be
helpful.
Specifications: For system on diskette see, PB92-501527.
Sponsored by Environmental Protection Agency, Washington,
DC. Office of Emergency and Remedial Response. 174p.
Subject index keywords: User manuals(Computer pro-
grams), Analytical chemistry, Environmental surveys, Organic
compounds, Waste management, Organic Contract Compli-
ance Screening System.
0060 Organic Contract Compliance Screening System.
Software for the PC (Version June 1990). User Manual
Order Number PB92-145580CDH, price: PC A08/MF A02
Viar and Co., Alexandria, VA. Environmental Services Div.;
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Jun 90
The Organic Contract Compliance Screening System
(OCCSS) software is a version of a mainframe-based appli-
cation developed by Viar and Company for the U.S. Environ-
mental Protection Agency's National Contract Laboratory
Program (CLP). OCCSS is designed to automate the determi-
nation of contractual compliance and completeness of data
submitted to EPA under the Routine Analytical Services
(RAS) programs of CERCLA (Comprehensive Environmental
Response Compensation and Liability Act) and SARA (Su-
perfund Amendments and Reauthorization Act). The manual
provides the user with instructions for running OCCSS soft-
ware on the PC. Descriptions of and instructions for each
menu are detailed in the following sections. The user should
have a working knowledge of PC DOS prior to utilizing this
system. The following sections present the OCCSS operating
environment, describe system output (reports), provide in-
structions for running the system and generating reports, and
specify input data requirements. Examples of reports are
contained in Appendix A. Appendix B contains descriptions
of sample suffix codes arid report defect codes. Appendix C
is a listing of defect statements by criterion with associated
SOW references. Data Formats A and B from the Organic
RAS SOW (2/88) are included as Appendix D. Since OGCSS
PC software is implemented using Base SAS Software, the
'SAS Language Guide for Personal Computers' from The
SAS Institute, Inc. in Gary, North Carolina may be helpful.
Specifications: For system on diskette see, PB92-501501.
Sponsored by Environmental Protection Agency, Washington,
DC. Office of Emergency and Remedial Response. 159p.
Subject index keywords: Environmental surveys, Waste
management, Analytical chemistry, User manuals(Computer
programs), Organic compounds, Organic Contract Compli-
ance Screening System.
0061 Performance Tracking under ARCS Contracts
Order Number PB93-963276CDH, price: PC A01/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 8 Sep 92
The directive discusses the development of a non-resource
intensive method for reporting performance based work allo-
cation results under the ARCS (Alternative Remedial Con-
tracting Strategy) contractors.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 3p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
Hazardous materials, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
Response, Alternative Remedial Contracting Strategy.
0062 Procedures to Ensure that CLP Laboratories Are
Not Paid for Non-Compliant or Unuseable Data
Order Number PB94-963214CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 12 Aug 93
The memo reviews and emphasizes procedures for ensuring
that CLP laboratories are not paid for non-compliant or un-
useable data.,
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 32p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Laboratories, Inspec-
tion.
12
-------
ADMINISTRATIVE & MANAGEMENT: Contracting &
Contracts Integrity
0063 Reassignment of CLP Transportation Functions
Order Number PB93-963501CDH, price: PC A01/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 19 Jan 93
The directive discusses the reassignment of the responsibil-
ity of providing CLP (Contract Laboratory Program) sample
coolers to the regions and their support contractors.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 4p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
Hazardous materials, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
Response.
0064 Regional Pilot Projects and Initiatives
Order Number PB92-963259CDH, price: PC A01/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; 28 Jan 92
The directive discusses the initiation of regional pilot projects
designed to make NPL site cleanup more effective, efficient,
and/or equitable. Pilot projects will demonstrate innovative
ways to accomplish this objective at NPL and will, if success-
ful, offer similar opportunities at other sites.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, De-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 5p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
Hazardous materials, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
Response.
0065 Required Contracts Management Training for
Regional Superfund Personnel
Order Number PB93-963258CDH, price: PC A01/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 7 Jul 92
The memorandum establishes the required training regarding
the management of contracts for all regional Superfund pro-
gram personnel.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 3p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Training, Contract
management.
0066 Resources for Preparing Independent Government
Estimates for Remedial Contracting Work Assignments
Order Number PB93-963267CDH, price: PC A01/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 5 Aug 92
The memorandum provides information regarding the avail-
ability of tools, data bases, and assistance for developing in-
dependent government estimates of the cost of work to be
performed by contractors for remedial work assignments.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. See also PB92-963257. 5p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste treat-
ment, Contract administration, Superfund.
0067 Response Action Contractor Final Indemnification
Guidelines. Volume 2, Number 1, March 1993
Order Number PB93-963290CDH, price: PC A01/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Mar 93
The Final Guidelines supersede EPA's Interim Guidance on
Indemnification which, since 1987, has prescribed the stand-
ard terms and conditions for indemnification agreements with
Superfund response action contractors (RACs). Under
CERCLA Section 119, EPA has discretionary authority to in-
demnify RACs for third-party damage claims based on negli-
gent release during a response action. The Final Guidelines
affect all response action contracts, including ARCS, ERGS,
TES, and TAT. The Guidelines also impact grants, contracts
issued by States under cooperative agreements with EPA,
closed contracts, and contracts awarded by the U.S. Army
Corps of Engineers and other Federal agencies operating
under interagency agreements with EPA to cleanup Super-
fund sites.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 4p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Hazardous materials,
Waste disposal.
0068 Revision of Policy Regarding Superfund Project
Assignment between Alternative Remedial Contracting
Strategy Contractors and the U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers
Order Number PB92-963327CDH, price: PC A01/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; 10 Dec 91
The report revises the policy for assigning Superfund remedi-
al work to EPA Alternative Remedial Contracting Strategy
(ARCs) contractors and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
(USAGE).
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 4p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Government
policies, Waste management, Superfund.
0069 Roles and Responsibilities of Deputy Project
Officers and Work Assignment Managers under the
Technical Enforcement Support (TES) Contracts
Order Number PB91-139741CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 17 Feb 88
The directive provides a list of duties and responsibilities that
Regional contacts who will now serve as Deputy Project Offi-
cers under Headquarters Project Officers for the TES con-
tracts, must now perform in managing and administering
these contracts.
Specifications: See also PB91-139758. 12p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
Hazardous materials, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
Response, Technical Enforcement Support Contract.
13
-------
ADMINISTRATIVE & MANAGEMENT: Contracting &
Contracts Integrity
0070 Roles and Responsibilities of Regional Project
Officers, Zone Project Officers, Work Assignment
Managers and Contracting Officers for the RCRA
Enforcement, Permitting and Assistance Contracts
(REPA)
Order Number PB94-963614CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 22 Feb 94
This directive sets out the roles and responsibilities of the
Regional Project Officers (RPOs), Headquarters Zone Project
Officers (ZPOs), Work Assignment Managers (WAMs) and
Contracting Officers (COs) of the RCRA Enforcement Permit-
ting and Assistance (REPA) Contracts.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 16p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
Hazardous materials, Contractor personnel, Office of Solid
Waste and Emergency Response, REPA contracts.
0071 Sampler's Guide to the Contract Laboratory
Program
Order Number PB91-921330CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Dec 90
The Sampler's Guide provides gu idance and direction to
program clients. It is designed to clarify sampling procedures
necessary to submit samples for CLP analysis. The Sam-
pler's Guide acts as a reference for the Regions and sam-
pling contractors to promote consistency in sampling proce-
dures throughout the Regions and ensure the proper adher-
ence to CLP requirements.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $150 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $300). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 42p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Guidelines, Sample
preparation, Waste management, Office of Solid Waste and
Emergency Response, Contract Laboratory Program.
0072 Superfund Contracts Management Issues
Order Number PB92-963257CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; 31 Jan 92
The directive initiates new requirements regarding the devel-
opment of independent government cost estimates, review of
contractor invoices, and the appropriate participation on Per-
formance Evaluation Boards.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 7p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Pollution
control, Contract administration, Superfund.
0073 Superfund Program Management Manual, Fiscal
Year 1994
Order Number PB94-963247CDH, price: Standing Order, call
for price
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Apr 94
The information in the Manual is targeted to Unit, Section,
and Branch Chiefs. Its primary purpose is to provide: The pri-
mary program goals and priotities for FY94; and An overview
of the Superfund program management processes (planning,
accomplishment reporting and program evaluation, and re-
source allocation). The FY 94 Superfund Program Manage-
ment Manual consists of information on: Manager's schedule
of significant events; Program goals and priorities; Program
planning and reporting requirements; and Financial manage-
ment and FTE distribution. Appendix A contains targets/
measures and definitions for site screening and assessment/
regional decision, early and long-term actions, program sup-
port activities, enforcement, and Federal Facilities.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order; de-
posit account required ($100 U.S., Canada, and Mexico; all
others $200). Single copies also available in paper copy or
microfiche. 249p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Hazardous materials,
Waste management, Project management.
0074 Superfund Response Action Contracts
Order Number PB93-963292CDH, price: PC A01/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; May 93
The fact sheet discusses the EPA's Response Action Con-
tracts to provide professional architect/engineer services to
support response planning and oversight of activities, includ-
ing contract services required, contract structure, and the
procurement process.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or .microfiche. 4p.
Subject index keywords:: Superfund, US EPA, Contract ad-
ministration, Technical assistance, Waste management.
0075 Technical Assistance Team (TAT) Contracts Users'
Manual
Order Number PB92-963407CDH, price: PC A09/MF A02
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Dec 91
The report provides information and guidance on manage-
ment and implementation of EPA's Technical Assistance
Team (TAT) for Emergency Response, Removal, and Pre-
vention' contracts. Also, the study describes the necessary
procedures and requirements that should be followed in
managing contracts.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. Supersedes PB91-214163. 178p.
Subject index keywords: Technical assistance, Contract
management, Superfund.
0076 Treatability Studies Contractor Work Assignments
Order Number PB90-273962CDH, price: PC A01/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; 12 Jul 90
The directive requires all future remedial and removal work
assignments involving treatability studies to contain a provi-
sion requiring the contract or to provide the Agency's Super-
fund Data Base with a copy of the work products.
Specifications: 4p.
14
-------
ADMINISTRATIVE & MANAGEMENT: Planning &
Program Management
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste treat-
ment, Superfund, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Re-
sponse, Waste management.
0077 USEPA Contract Laboratory Program National
Functional Guidelines for Organic Data Review
Order Number PB94-963501CDH, price: PC A07/MF A02
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Feb 93
The document is intended to assist in the technical review of
analytical data generated through the CLP. The data review
process provides information on analytical limitations of a
data based Quality Control (QC) criteria.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 130p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Laborato-
ries, Chemical analysis, Superfund.
0078 User's Guide to Contract Laboratory Program
Order Number PB90-186396CDH, price: PC A12/MF A02
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Dec 88
Describes an organic and inorganic analytical program and
outlines CLP protocols implemented into CLP analysis con-
tracts in 1987 (inorganic) and 1988 (organic). Contains criti-
cal information for CLP samplers and user groups of EPA
and of the States.
Specifications: 255p.
Subject index keywords: Guides(lnstructions), Laboratories,
Contract administration, Superfund program, Contract Labo-
ratory Program.
0079 User's Guide to the Contract Laboratory Program
Order Number PB91-214296CDH, price: PC A13/MF A02
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Dec 86
The document was specifically prepared for the guidance
and direction of program clients. The organic and inorganic
analytical program descriptions herein outline the require-
ments and analytical procedures of the new CLP protocols
developed from technical caucus recommendations. These
protocols were implemented into CLP analysis contracts in
1985. Other analytical programs, procedures and documenta-
tion described herein reflect the status of the program as of
July 1986.
Specifications: 278p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
Hazardous materials, Chemical analysis, Office of Solid
Waste and Emergency Response, Contract Laboratory Pro-
gram.
0080 User's Guide to the Contract Laboratory Program
Order Number PB91-921278CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Jan 91
The report describes an organic and inorganic analytical pro-
gram and outlines Contract Laboratory Program (CLP) proto-
cols. Contains critical .information for CLP samplers and user
groups in EPA and the states.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 75p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Laborato-
ries, Superfund.
ADMINISTRATIVE & MANAGEMENT:
Docket & Program Management
0081 Superfund Docket Operations Manual for
• Rulemaking Activities
Order Number PB91-921349CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
Booz-Allen and Hamilton, Inc., Bethesda, MD.; Environmental
Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of Emergency
and Remedial Response; Jul 90
The directive discusses the purpose of the SDIC Operations
Manual for Rulemaking Activities which is to serve as a pro-
cedural guide for SDIC staff when a rulemaking docket is
prepared. These procedures are evaluated on a regular
basis, and are revised as needed to keep the SDIC oper-
ationally efficient and responsive to its users.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $150 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $300). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. Sponsored by Environmental Pro-
tection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of Emergency and
Remedial Response. 73p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
Hazardous materials, Manuals, Office of Solid Waste and
Emergency Response, Superfund Docket and Information
Center.
ADMINISTRATIVE & MANAGEMENT:
Planning & Program Management
0082 Accelerated Response at NPL Sites Guidance
(Superfund Management Review: Recommendation No.
22)
Order Number PB90-258302CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; 15 Dec 89
The directive communicates Agency guidance on accelerat-
ing responses at National Priorities List (NPS) sites.
Specifications: 19p.
Subject index keywords: Regulations, Superfund, Prereme-
dial action, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response,
National Priorities List.
0083 Additional Guidance on 'Worst Sites' and 'NPL
Caliber Sites' to Assist in SACM Implementation
Order Number PB94-963206CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 26 Aug 93
The document is intended to assist the Regions by giving
clear guidance as to what constitutes NPL caliber sites and
to assist in minimizing the potential for 'false positive' NPL
packages. It also sets forth the actions needed to support
the efforts to implement SACM and encourage appropriate
data gathering to support NPL listing and RI/FS decisions.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
15
-------
ADMINISTRATIVE & MANAGEMENT: Planning &
Program Management
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 6p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Risk assessment, Re-
medial action, Site surveys.
0084 Assessing Sites under SACM: Interim Guidance.
Volume 1, Number 4, Deccember 1992
Order Number PB93-963265CDH, price: PC A01/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Dec 92
The purpose of the Superfund Accelerated Cleanup Model
(SACM) is to make Superfund cleanups more timely and effi-
cient. This will be accomplished through more focus on the
front end of the process and better integration of all Super-
fund program components. The bulletin discusses assessing
sites under SACM.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 5p.
Subject index keywords: Site surveys, Superfund, Remedial
action, Waste management, Cleanup operations, Superfund
Accelerated Cleanup Model.
0085 Audit Management Process. Reference Guide
Order Number PB94-963232CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Mar 94
Federal law requires Executive and Federal Branch agencies
to institute programs designed to respond to and follow-up
on audits issued by the Agency's Office of Inspector General
(OIG) and the General Accounting Office (GAO), the two
main bodies which audit EPA programs and activities. The
audit management process is comprised of three main activi-
ties; cooperating with auditors to provide information, re-
sponding to the audits, and implementing audit recommenda-
tions to correct deficiencies found during the investigation.
The reference guide is designed to describe the audit man-
agement process, relevant terms, roles and responsibilities
of participants, and helpful hints and tools for full compli-
ance. General language is used to discuss the overall proc-
ess within EPA, but this guide is primarily geared toward
Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response (OSWER)
and Office of Emergency and Remedial Response (OERR)
managers and staff.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 36p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
Auditing.
0086 Audits and the Superfund Program Manager
Order Number PB90-272717CDH, price: PC A01/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Jan 90
The fact sheet describes why audits of all parties to Cooper-
ative Agreements and Superfund State Contracts (SSCs) are
good business practices and how audits help EPA protect
the financial integrity of Superfund response agreements.
Specifications: 4p.
Subject index keyword:;: Project management, Auditing,
Superfund, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response,
Waste management.
0087 Audits and the Superfund Program Manager
Order Number PB92-963328CDH, price: PC A01/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Oct 91
The report describes why audits of all parties to Cooperative
Agreements and Superfund State Contracts are good busi-
ness practices, and how audits help EPA protect the finan-
cial integrity of Superfund response agreements.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. Supersedes PB90-272717. 2p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Pollution
control, Project management, Auditing, Superfund.
0088 Community Relations: Use of Senior Environmental
Employees in Superfund (Superfund Management
Review: Recommendation 43.K.L)
Order Number PB90-273749CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; 31 Aug 90
The directive describes the use of Senior Environmental Em-
ployees in the Superfund program and offers guidance on
their future use.
Specifications: 6p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Personnel,
Elderly persons, Superfund, Community relations, Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response, Citizen participation,
Waste management.
0089 Early Action and Long-Term Action under SACM:
Interim Guidance, Volume 1, Number 2, December 1992
Order Number PB93-963263CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Dec 92
The purpose of the Superfund Accelerated Cleanup Model
(SACM) is to make Superfund cleanups more timely and effi-
cient. This will be accomplished through more focus on the
front end of the process and better integration of all Super-
fund program components. The SACM Bulletin discusses
early and long term actions that the Region should consider
taking under SACM.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 6p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
Remedial action, Superfund Accelerated Cleanup Model,
Cleanup operations.
0090 Enforcement under SACM: Interim Guidance.
Volume 1, Number 3, December 1992
Order Number PB93-963264CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Dec 92
The purpose of the Superfund Accelerated Cleanup Model
(SACM) is to make Superfund cleanups more timely and effi-
cient. This will be accomplished through more focus on the
front end of the process and better integration of all Super-
16
-------
fund program components. The bulletin discusses major en-
forcement areas affected by SACM including: The timing and
methodology of PRP searches; timing and content of negoti-
ations with PRPs; notice letters; consultations for early ac-
tions; state involvement in enforcement; de minimis settle-
ments; the availability and adequacy of administrative
records; and cost recovery and cost documentation.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U S Canada
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 7p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Remedial action
Waste management, Hazardous materials, Superfund Accel-
erated Cleanup Model.
0091 Exercising Flexibility through the Superfund
Accelerated Cleanup Model (SACM)
Order Number PB93-963253CDH, price: PC A01/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Oct 92
The directive reaffirms the Office of Solid Waste and Emer-
gency Response's commitment to supporting regional offices
in soundly-based decision-making while implementing the Su-
perfund Accelerated Cleanup Model.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S Canada
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. See also PB93-963252. 3p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management
Hazardous materials, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
Response, Superfund Accelerated Cleanup Model.
0092 Expectations for Full Implementation of SACM
Order Number PB94-963219CDH, price: PC A01/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; 28 Jan 94
Below are the expectations for implementation of the Super-
fund Accelerated Cleanup Model (SACM). They have been
jointly developed by Headquarters and the Regions. There
are a few key points to be emphasized: SACM is the usual
way of doing business at Superfund sites; Regions should
have an up-to-date site inventory and workplan; and Regions
substantially reduce the Site Inspection Prioritization (SIP)
backlog. '
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S. Canada
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 5p.
!A!%^ 'ndex keywords: Superfund, Site characterization,
SACM(Superfund Accelerated Cleanup Model).
0093 Further Direction on Implementing the Superfund
Accelerated Cleanup Model (SACM)
Order Number PB93-963291CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
bolid Waste and Emergency Response; 27 Apr 93
The memorandum provides a summary of progress to date in
implementing SACM and refines goals and strategies in tran-
sitionmg to full implementation in FY 1994.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S. Canada
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 6p.
ADMINISTRATIVE & MANAGEMENT: Planning &
Program Management
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Hazardous materials,
Waste disposal, SACM(Superfund Accelerated Cleanup
Model).
0094 Guidance on Implementation of the Superfund
Accelerated Cleanup Model (SACM) under CERCLA and
the NCP
Order Number PB93-963252CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; 7 Jul 92
The directive provides a more precise description of the Su-
perfund Accelerated Cleanup Model (SACM) in order to
ensure its consistent application with CERCLA and the NCP.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 12p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
Hazardous materials, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
Response, Superfund Accelerated Cleanup Model.
0095 Highlights: Superfund Program Management. Fiscal
Year 1993
Order Number PB93-963261CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Oct 92
The manual is targeted to EPA Superfund Division Directors.
It is intended to provide an overview of Fiscal Year 1993 Su-
perfund program goals and management initiatives. Specifi-
cally the document contains information on strategic planning
goals and themes, program planning and budgeting, and
manager's schedule of significant events.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 37p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Project
management, Superfund.
0096 HSIED SACM Report. Volume 1, Number 1, January
1993
Order Number PB93-963289CDH, price: PC A01/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Jan 93
The bulletin is issued by the Hazardous Site Evaluation Divi-
sion to keep regional staff up-to-date on program and proce-
dural changes resulting from the Superfund Accelerated
Cleanup Model.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 2p.
Subject Index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste man-
agement, Remedial action, Superfund Accelerated Cleanup
Model(SACM), Waste removal.
17
-------
ADMINISTRATIVE & MANAGEMENT: Planning &
Program Management
0097 Innovative Methods to Increase Public Involvement
in Superfund Community Relations (Superfund
Management Review Recommendation No. 43.A)
Order Number PB91-921344CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; 30 Nov 90
The directive lists six (6) techniques proven effective in in-
creasing public involvement in the Superfund process. While
some are recent innovations, others were developed many
years ago, but new and better ways of using them have bol-
stered their effectiveness. These techniques are citizen work
groups, citizen superfund workshops, bilingual communica-
tion, citizen awards for participation, increased interviews,
and open nous availability sessions. The list does not pre-
tend to be exhaustive. Instead, it shows some of the out-
reach vehicles Regions have found to be particularly effec-
tive in encouraging citizen participation. Regions should
make every effort to integrate as many as possible of these
activities into the cleanup process.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $150 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $300). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 6p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
Hazardous materials, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
Response.
0098 Integrated Timeline for Superfund Site Management
(SMR 5,15)
Order Number PB91-139717CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; 11 Jun 90
The directive displays the key steps and optimum duration of
phases in moving sites from identification to remediation. It is
the authors intention that the duration of key phases be
viewed as goals toward which will jointly work to move the
program.
Specifications: 15p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
Hazardous materials, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
Response.
0099 Involvement of Superfund Program Managers in
Superfund Response Agreement Audits
Order Number PB90-249731CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; 12 Feb 90
The directive provides general reference information to Su-
perfund program managers about the audit process. The in-
formation in the Directive pertains primarily to audits of Co-
operative Agreements, but may be applied to audits of Su-
perfund State Contracts (SSCs).
Specifications: 20p.
Subject index keywords: Regulations, State government,
Auditing, Superfund, Remedial action, Office of Solid Waste
and Emergency Response, Cooperative agreements.
0100 Making Superfund Documents Available to the
Public throughout the Cleanup Process, and Discussing
Site Findings and Decisions as They are Developed
(Superfund Management Review: No. 43 G, H, Q, R, T)
Order Number PB91-921322CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; 5 Nov 90
The directive summarizes five recommendations for improv-
ing Superfund efforts towards timely release of information to
the public during site cleanup activities. It provides guidance
for the Regions to make documents available to the public
throughout the cleanup process and to discuss site findings
and decisions as they are developed for the sake of more
fully involving citizens in the cleanup process and ensuring
two way communication between Superfund staff and local
communities.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $150 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $300). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 8p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
Hazardous materials, Remedial action, Office of Solid Waste
and Emergency Response.
0101 Management Review of the Superfund Program
Order Number PB90-153875CDH, price: PC A09/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC; 1989
Contents: A clear strategy for Superfund; Strengthening en-
forcement and maximizing responsible party work at Super-
fund sites; Accelerating and improving remedial action; Bring-
ing innovative technologies to bear on pollution at superfund
sites to strengthen remedy selection; An aggressive program
of community involvement; Management and administration:
Freeing up the skills and tools to do the job; Accounting for
achievement: Communicating progress to the public.
Specifications: Also available from Supt. of Docs. See also
PB90-153883. 186p.
Subject index keywords: Management, Hazardous materi-
als, Pollution control, Superfund program.
0102 Management Review of the Superfund Program:
Implementation Plan
• Order Number PB90-153883CDH, price: PC A08/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; 21 Sep 89
The Superfund 90-Day Study set forth a comprehensive
long-term strategy for the Superfund Program. The basic ele-
ments of the strategy are to: Control acute threats immedi-
ately; Deal with the worst sites and worst problems first;
Carefully monitor and maintain sites over the long term; Em-
phasize enforcement to induce private-party cleanup; Seek
new technologies for more effective cleanup; Improve the ef-
ficiency of program operations; and Encourage full participa-
tion by communities.
Specifications: Also available from Supt. of Docs. See also
PB90-153875. 173p.
Subject index keywords: Management, Hazardous materi-
als, Pollution control, Superfund Program, 90 day study.
18
-------
ADMINISTRATIVE & MANAGEMENT: Planning &
Program Management
0103 Mandatory Community Relations Training
Superfund Management Review Implementation Product
(Recommendation: No. 43.P(i))
Order Number PB90-272592CDH, price: PC A01/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
hmergency and Remedial Response; 1 Dec 89
The directive formally announces mandatory community rela-
tions training for Remedial Project Managers, On-Scene Co-
ordinators and other Regional staff and managers who
attend public meetings or deal with the public. The directive
explains what the requirements are, and why the training is
necessary. a
Specifications: 5p.
Subject index keywords: Personnel development, Project
J?TJ*8fITient' Community relations, Superfund, Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response.
°1«i..Mandatory Trainin9 Requirements for OCSs and
RPMs
Order Number PB90-272584CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; 29 Sep 89
The directive formally announces the mandatory training re-
Pr^rt8MS f°r °nfoore Coord™«>™ (OSCs) and Remedial
Project Managers (RPMs) at all levels. Addresses Congres-
8!?V«r management, and employee concerns raised
about the preparation of OSCs and RPMs to perform their
JODS.
Specifications: 6p.
^enlinde,Xo^r)rds: Personnel development, Super-
fund, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response.
0105 Minimizing Problems Caused by Staff Turnover
-------
ADMINISTRATIVE & MANAGEMENT: Planning &
Program Management
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 2p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
Hazardous materials, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
Response, Superfund Accelerated Cleanup Model, Pilot pro-
grams.
0111 SACM Regional Decision Teams: Interim Guidance.
Volume 1, Number 5, December 1992
Order Number PB93-963266CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Dec 92
The purpose of the Superfund Accelerated Cleanup Model
(SACM) is to make Superfund cleanups more timely and effi-
cient. This will be accomplished through more focus on the
front end of the process and better integration of all Super-
fund program components. The bulletin discusses the Re-
gional Decision Team under SACM. The Regional Decision
Team provides for broad participation across all program ele-
ments while placing emphasis on teamwork and Regional
and staff empowerment.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 6p.
Subject Index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
Remedial action, Regional Decision Team, Cleanup oper-
ations, Superfund Accelerated Cleanup Model.
0112 SRIS System Overview and User's Guide
Order Number PB94-963233CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Mar 94
Federal law requires Executive and Federal Branch agencies
to institute programs designed to respond to and follow up
on audits issued by the Agency's Office of Inspector General
(OIG) and the General Accounting Office (GAO), the two
main bodies which audit EPA programs and activities. The
audit management process is comprised of three main activi-
ties; cooperating with auditors to provide information, re-
sponding to audits, and implementing audit recommendations
to correct deficiencies found during the investigation. The
reference guide is designed to introduce the audit manage-
ment process tool available to the Office of Emergency and
Remedial Response (OERR) managers and staff, Superfund
Report Information System (SRIS): a description of SRIS and
its operation is provided.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 20p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Pollution control, Au-
diting.
0113 Status of Key SACM Program Management Issues:
Interim Guidance, Volume 1, Number 1, December 1992
Order Number PB93-963262CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Dec 92
The purpose of the Superfund Accelerated Cleanup Model
(SACM) is to make Superfund cleanups more timely and effi-
cient. This will be accomplished through more focus on the
fron end of the process and better integration of all Super-
fund program components. The SACM Program Manage-
ment Update describes activities underway, planned, and re-
cently completed to refocus Superfund's program manage-
ment systems to support SACM implementation.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 6p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Remedial action,
Waste management, Management planning, Superfund Ac-
celerated Cleanup Model, Cleanup operations.
0114 status of State Involvement in the Superfund
Program, FY 80 to FY 89
Order Number PB90-272725CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Apr 90
The report summarizes state involvement throughout the Su-
perfund process since the passage of the Comprehensive
Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act
(CERCLA). The report includes the roles and responsibilities
of States; an overview of the Superfund process and phases
of response; an historical perspective on State involvement
in each phase of response at Superfund Sites; and a sum-
mary of State involvement in non-site specific activities.
Specifications: 37p.
Subject index keywords: Project planning, State govern-
ment, Superfund.
0115 Superfund Accelerated Cleanup Bulletin:
Presumptive Remedies for Municipal Landfill Sites.
Volume 2, Number 1, February 1993
Order Number PB93-963269CDH, price: PC A01/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Feb 93
Since Superfund's inception in 1980, the removal and reme-
dial programs have found that certain categories of sites
have similar characteristics, such as the types of contami-
nants present, past industrial use, or the environmental
media that are affected. Based on a wealth of information
acquired from evaluating and cleaning up these sites, Super-
fund is undertaking an initiative to develop presumptive rem-
edies that are appropriate for specific types of sites, contami-
nants, or both. The initiative is part of a larger program
known as the Superfund Accelerated Cleanup Model
(SACM), which is designed to speed all aspects of the Su-
perfund clean-up process. The objective of the presumptive
remedies initiative is to use clean-up techniques shown to be
effective in the past at similiarsite in the future. The use of
presumptive remedies will streamline removal actions, site
studies, and clean-up actions, thereby improving consistency,
reducing costs, and increasing the speed with which hazard-
ous waste sites are remediated.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 2p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
Hazardous materials, Remedial action, Superfund Acceler-
ated Cleanup Model.
20
-------
ADMINISTRATIVE & MANAGEMENT: Planning &
Program Management
0116 Superfund Accelerated Cleanup Bulletin:
Presumptive Remedies for Wood Treatment Facilities
Volume 1, Number 2, May 1992
Order Number PB92-963361CDH, price: PC A01/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; May 92
Superfund is undertaking an initiative to develop presumptive
remedies that are appropriate for specific types of sites, con-
taminants, or both. The initiative is part of a larger program,
known as the Superfund Accelerated Cleanup Model
(SACM), which is designed to speed all aspects of the Su-
perfund clean-up process. The issue of the Superfund Accel-
erated Cleanup Bulletin describes presumptive remedies for
wood treatment facilities.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 2p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Remedial action
Waste management, Wood preservatives, Hazardous materi-
als, Cleanup operations, Wood treatment facilities.
0117 Superfund Accelerated Cleanup Bulletin. Volume 1,
Number 1. Presumptive Remedies for Municipal Landfill
Sites
Order Number PB92-963367CDH, price: PC A01/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Apr 92
The bulletin provides an overview of the presumptive reme-
dies initiative. The objective of the presumptive remedies ini-
tiative is to use clean-up technologies shown to be effective
in the past at similar sites in the future. The use of presump-
tive remedies will streamline removal actions, site studies,
and clean-up actions, thereby improving consistency, reduc-
ing costs, and increasing the speed with which hazardous
waste sites are remediated.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. See also PB92-963371. 1p.
Subject index keywords: Municipalities, Hazardous materi-
als, Pollution control, Superfund.
0118 Superfund Accelerated Cleanup Bulletin. Volume 1,
Number 3. Presumptive Remedies
Order Number PB92-963371CDH, price: PC A01/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Aug 92
The bulletin outlines the Superfund efforts underway for de-
veloping presumptive remedies for various types of sites. The
objective of the presumptive remedies initiative is to use
clean-up techniques shown to be effective in the past at
similar sites in the future. The use of presumptive remedies
will streamline removal actions, site studies, and clean-up ac-
tions, thereby improving consistency, reducing costs, and in-
creasing the speed with which hazardous waste sites are re-
mediated.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. See also PB92-963367. 2p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
Hazardous materials, Remedial action, Technology assess-
ment, Cleanup operations.
0119 Superfund Accelerated Cleanup Model (SACM)
Order Number PB92-963263CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Mar 92
The document details the Superfund Accelerated Cleanup
Model (SACM), the Office of Emergency and Remedial Re-
sponse's new model for streamlining and accelerating the
Superfund program. The concept has been designed to
make Superfund work better and deliver results the public
will value: (1) quick reduction of acute risks at all Superfund
sites (removal and remedial) and (2) restoration of the envi-
ronment over the long term.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 30p.
Subject index keywords: Sites, Hazardous materials, Su-
perfund, Cleanup.
0120 Superfund Accelerated Cleanup Model (SACM)
Coordination Strategy
Order Number PB94-963201CDH, price: PC A01/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 14 Sep 93
The memorandum introduces a coordination strategy that is
designed to promote the implementation of the Superfund
Accelerated Cleanup Model (SACM).
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 4p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Hazardous materials,
Waste management, Directives, Cleanup.
0121 Superfund Accelerated Cleanup Model (SACM):
Questions and Answers
Order Number PB93-963286CDH, price: PC A01/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Jul 93
The bulletin provides answers to issues the Regions have
raised on the Superfund Accelerated Cleanup Model
(SACM).
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $225 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $450). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 5p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste dis-
posal, Remedial action, SACM(Superfund Accelerated Clean-
up Model).
0122 Superfund Accelerated Cleanup Model (SACM).
Volume 1, Number 4, November 1992
Order Number PB92-963287CDH, price: PC A01/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Nov 92
The U.S. EPA currently is developing and implementing a
streamlined way to clean up hazardous waste sites known as
the Superfund Accelerated Cleanup Model, or SACM. It is
designed to make the Superfund Program more efficient by
21
-------
ADMINISTRATIVE & MANAGEMENT: Planning &
Program Management
cutting years off of cleanups and quickly reducing risks to
people and the environment. This bulletin issue provides an
overview of the Superfund Accelerated Cleanup Model.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200, U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 1 p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Remedial action,
Mathematical models, Waste management, Superfund Accel-
erated Cleanup Model, Cleanup operations.
0123 Superfund Program and Information Management
Update. Volume 1, Number 1, November 1993
Order Number PB94-963208CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Nov 93
This is the first edition of a new technical bulletin combining
the information previously found in the SCAP Bulletin, CER-
CLIS Connection, SMARTech Signal, and RP2M Reflection.
Merging these publications into an all-inclusive bulletin
serves two purposes: (1) it conforms to recent internal
Agency direction to ensure that all 'bulletins' be technical in
nature; and (2) it uses contractor and EPA funds more effi-
ciently.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 8p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Information manage-
ment, Program management.
0124 Superfund Program Implementation Manual, Fiscal
Year 1994. Volume 1. Program Goals and Planning
Requirements. Volume 2. Program Implementation
Procedures
Order Number PB94-963220CDH, price: PC A24/MF A04
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Oct 93
The Information in the manual is targeted to Information
Management Coordinators, Remedial Project Managers, and
On-Scene Coordinators. Its primary purpose is to provide
guidance to this audience on management of Superfund pro-
gram. The FY 94 Superfund Program Implementation Manual
consists of two volumes. Volume 1 contains information on
program goals and priorities, program planning and reporting,
and budget and workload models. Volume 2 includes appen-
dices providing information on specific programs and acts
and their applicability to Superfund Comprehensive Accom-
plishments Program (SCAP).
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 565p.
Subject Index keywords: Superfund, Hazardous materials,
Waste management.
0125 Superfund Responsiveness Summaries (Superfund
Management Review: Recommendation Number 43E)
Order Number PB90-273731CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; 4 Jun 90
The directive describes the background of responsiveness
summaries and outlines a new format intended to provide
summaries that can deal thoroughly with complicated legal
and technical issues while maintaining true responsiveness
to local communities.
Specifications: 6p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Superfund,
Management review, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
Response, Waste management, Community relations.
0126 Superfund Strategic Plan and Implementation
Strategy Fiscal Year 1994
Order Number PB94-963245CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Jan 94
This Plan presents the Superfund Program's strategic direc-
tion for Fiscal Year 1994. The Vision for the program is:: Build
public confidence in the Superfund and Oil Pollution Re-
sponse Programs; The Mission for the program is: Super-
fund- dedicated to reducing risks to people and the environ-
ment by cleaning up the Nation's hazardous waste problems
and making polluters pay.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. See also PB94-963246. 73p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Program
management, Cleanup, Pollution control, Superfund, Strate-
gic planning.
0127 Superfund Strategic Plan and Implementation
Strategy Fiscal Year 1994: Office and Division Plans
Order Number PB94-963246CDH, price: PC A06/MF A02
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Jan 94
The Plan presents the Superfund Program's strategic direc-
tion for Fiscal Year 1994. The Vision for the program is: Build
public confidence in the Superfund and Oil Pollution Re-
sponse Programs; The Mission for the program is: Super-
fund: dedicated to reducing risks to people and the environ-
ment by cleaning up the Nation's hazardous waste problems
and making polluters pay. Oil Pollution: dedicated to ensuring
the protection of human health and the environment from oil
pollution.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. See also PB94-963245. 122p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Program
management, Cleanup, Pollution control, Superfund, Strate-
gic planning.
0128 Using State and Local Officials to Assist in
Community Relations (Superfund Management Review:
Recommendation No. 43.K,L)
Order Number PB91-921320CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; 28 Sep 90
The report outlines the suggestion and discusses specific
methods for using State and local officials to increase Super-
fund's communication with the public. The study discusses
recommendations that describe the use of State and local
officials to serve as liaisons, to provide and maintain informa-
tion, and to assist in public meetings.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $150 U.S., Canada,
22
-------
ADMINISTRATIVE & MANAGEMENT: Special
Reports
and Mexico; all others $300). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 6p.
Subject index keywords: Community relations, Hazardous
materials, Superfund, US EPA.
ADMINISTRATIVE & MANAGEMENT:
Special Reports
0129 Assurance of Hazardous Waste Capacity, Guidance
to State Officials. Assistance in Fulfilling the
Requirements of CERCLA 104(c)(9)
Order Number PB91-214171CDH, price: PG A05/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Dec 88
The document supplies guidance to state officials on provid-
ing assurances required by Section 104(c)(9) of the Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liabil-
ity Act, as amended ('CERCLA' or 'Superfund'). This section
of CERCLA requires states in which remedial actions may be
taken to provide assurances, prior to EPA taking or funding
such actions, of the availability of hazardous waste treatment
or disposal facilities which have adequate capacity to
manage the hazardous wastes expected within the state
over twenty years. The Guidance Document reflects EPA's
current understanding of the statutory requirements and de-
scribes how EPA currently suggests that states implement
these requirements. The guidance provides substantial infor-
mation to states, including suggested language for the con-
tracts and cooperative agreements to be signed, instructions
on the preparation of state Capacity Assurance Plans (CAPs)
that can form a basis for the assurances, and a model for
the interstate agreements or regional agreement or authority
required when addressing access to capacity in other states.
Specifications: 81 p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management
Hazardous materials, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
Response.
0130 CERCLA/Superfund Orientation Manual
Order Number PB93-193852CDH, price: PC A09/MF A02
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Oct 92
The manual serves as a program orientation guide and refer-
ence document, and it is designed to assist EPA and State
personnel involved with hazardous waste remediation, emer-
gency response, and chemical and emergency prepared-
ness. The Manual describes the organizational and oper-
ational components of the Superfund Program.
Specifications: 179p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Hazardous materials,
Waste disposal, CERCLA.
0131 CERCLA Waste Capacity Assurance
Order Number PB90-274507CDH, price: PC A01/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Aug 90
The fact sheet discusses waste capacity assurance, which is
one of the five assurances required of a State by CERCLA
before the hazardous waste Trust Fund (Superfund) can be
used for a remedial action. The sheet describes the statutory
goals associated with the waste capacity assurance, the Ca-
pacity Assurance Plan (CAP), and additional sources of infor-
mation.
Specifications: 5p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Capacity,
Superfund, Waste management, Office of Solid Waste and
Emergency Response, Remedial action.
0132 Cleaning Up the Nation's Waste Sites: Markets and
Technology Trends
Order Number PB93-140762CDH, price: PC$17.50
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC.
Technology Innovation Office.; Department of Defense,
Washington, DC.**Department of Energy, Washington, DC-
Apr 93
Over the next 20 to 30 years, federal, state, and local gov-
ernments and private industry will commit billions of dollars
annually to clean up sites contaminated with hazardous
waste and petroleum products. The report captures informa-
tion on the future demand for remediation services for all
major cleanup programs in the U.S., including Superfund, Re-
source Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) corrective
action, underground storage tanks, state programs, and fed-
eral agencies such as the Departments of Defense and
Energy. The market information should help innovative tech-
nology vendors, developers, and investors direct their re-
search, development, and commercialization efforts towards
pertinent waste programs and problems. The report makes
this market information available in one document. The
report provides a compilation of market data that are current-
ly available and descriptions of national cleanup programs.
Improved access to data on domestic markets will help direct
the development of new technology and strengthen U.S. ca-
pabilities in environmental cleanup. As companies acquire
field experience in this country, they will be better equipped
to compete internationally.
Specifications: Prepared in cooperation with Department of
Defense, Washington, DC., and Department of Energy,
Washington, DC. 173p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials,
Wastes(lndustrial), Sites, Cleanup time, States(United
States).
0133 Compendium of Good Ideas: Models of Success and
Lessons Learned. Volume 1. Highlights
Order Number PB93-963271CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Mar 93
The entries in Volume 1 illustrate measures undertaken in
each Regional office to improve implementation of the Su-
perfund Program.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. See also Volume 2, PB93-963272
34p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Program management,
Improvement.
23
-------
ADMINISTRATIVE & MANAGEMENT: Special Reports
0134 Compendium of Good Ideas: Models of Success and
Lessons Learned. Volume 2. Source Book
Order Number PB93-963272CDH, price: PC A05/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Mar 93
The report Volume 2 of the Compendium of Good Ideas is
designed to be a reference document for all personnel in-
volved in the implementation of Superfund. It contains nu-
merous entries that provide the user with some information
about specific initiatives or activities undertaken in various
EPA Regional offices.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. See also Volume 1, PB93-963271.
77p.
Subject Index keywords: Superfund, Program management,
Government employees, Improvement.
0135 Ecosystem Effects of Superfund. National Priority
List Sites In Industrial Landscapes: A Framework for
Policy Decisions
Order Number PB90-256728CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Georgia Univ., Athens. Inst. of Ecology.; Environmental
Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of Cooperative
Environmental Management; 1 Dec 89
The report is part of the National Network for Environmental
Management Studies under the auspices of the Office of Co-
operative Environmental Management of the U.S. Environ-
mental Protection Agency. In order to comply with Superfund
legislation for National Priority List Sites having ecosystem
effects that are located in industrial settings the study recom-
mends different perspectives. A review of pertinent literature
was conducted in order to develop a framework for EPA per-
sonnel who are developing policy decisions in this area. It is
recommended that a landscape perspective be taken in
order to account for the cumulative, long term effects of the
industrial setting. Such effects may be much more significant
than the toxic waste site itself, and thus options such as cre-
ation or purchase of additional natural acreage elsewhere
may make more ecological sense. The placing of the Super-
fund effort in a landscape perspective requires a national,
multiagency and interdisciplinary landscape management
plan in order to be feasible. Regardless of the decision made
in dealing with these types of NPL sites, a broadened ap-
proach must be taken that considers long term economic ef-
fects, and the overall goal of society. Types of questions that
need to be considered, as well as possible approaches that
can be used to achieve these ends are given.
Specifications: Sponsored by Environmental Protection
Agency, Washington, DC. Office of Cooperative Environmen-
tal Management. 42p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Site sur-
veys, Industrial wastes, Superfund, Ecosystems, Toxic sub-
stances.
0136 Forum Focus, August 1993
Order Number PB93-232684CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC.
Technology Innovation Office; Aug 93
Contents: Workgroup Updates; Sampling Workshop; Techni-
cal Support News; New Technical Forum; OWPE Risk As-
sessment Policy; RD/RA Guidance Development; and Issue
Paper Update.
Specifications: 6p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Hazardous materials,
Waste disposal, Newsletters.
0137 Guidance for Capacity Assurance Planning.
Capacity Planning Pursuant to CERCLA Section 104(c)(9)
Order Number PB93-209898CDH, price: PC A09/MF A02
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; May 93
The Guidance document advises states on how to assure
adequate hazardous waste treatment and disposal capacity
for meeting the requirements of Section 104(c)(9) of the
Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation,
and Liability Act (CERCLA or 'Superfund'), as amended, by
preparing 1993 Hazardous Waste Capacity Assurance Plans
(CAPs) It supersedes similar guidance documents issued in
December 1988 and April 1991, and should be used by
states for the 1993 Capacity Assurance Planning Process.
The document includes an overview of the Capacity Assur-
ance Planning Process, baseyear data, projections, and ad-
dressing shortfalls.
Specifications: 188p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
Hazardous materials, Capacity assurance plans.
0138 Hazardous Waste Superfund Collection: Database
Thesaurus
Order Number PB91-131326CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Information Resources Management; Sep 90
The Hazardous Waste Superfund Collection Database The-
saurus provides an index to terminology related to hazardous
waste and facilitates the use of the Hazardous Waste Super-
fund Collection Database. The second edition of the Thesau-
rus includes several new features. New keywords have been
added to ensure that the Thesaurus reflects current con-
cerns in the field of hazardous waste. The Thesaurus is di-
vided into two parts: the Alphabetical List of Keywords and
the List of Corporate Sources. The first part lists the Data-
base indexing terms alphabetically with an accompanying
definition. Beneath each term are found other terms that
have been classified as 'broader' (BT), 'narrower' (NT), or
'related' (RT) to the listed keyword. The List of Corporate
Sources contains a complete list of names and acronyms for
organizational sources currently indexed within the collection.
The list will aid users in their search for documents prepared
by EPA (Environmental Protection Agency), offices or other
government agencies. Also included in the edition is a 'Guide
to the Major Subject Headings' which consists of nine major
subject areas and their respective second tier terms.
Specifications: 61 p.
Subject index keywords: Thesauri, Hazardous materials,
Terminology, Subject index terms, Superfund data base.
0139 Index to the Monthly Hotline Report Questions
(June 1982 to December 1991)
Order Number PB92-131374CDH, price: PC A07/MF A02
Booz-Allen and Hamilton, Inc., Bethesda, MD.; Environmental
Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of Solid Waste
and Emergency Response; Dec 92
The document provides four indices to the question and
answer sections of the RCRA/Superfund/Oust Monthly Hot-
line Reports from June 1982 through December 1991. The
24
-------
ADMINISTRATIVE & MANAGEMENT: Special
Reports
first index is an alphabetical listing of question titles by year
and month. The second index organizes the questions by
regulatory citation, beginning with 40 CFR 257. The third
index organizes the questions by statuatory citation. Finally,
the fourth index references the questions by key word or
subject heading.
Specifications: See also PB92-131242 and PB92-131390.
Sponsored by Environmental Protection Agency, Washington,
DC. Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response. 130p.
Subject index keywords: Information management, Waste
management, Regulations, Indexes(Documentation), Hotline
Reports.
0140 Inside the Hotline: A Compilation of 1991 Monthly
Hotline Reports
Order Number PB92-131390CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
Booz-Allen and Hamilton, Inc., Bethesda, MD.; Environmental
Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of Solid Waste
and Emergency Response; Mar 92
The Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA)/Su-
perfund (SF)/Office of Underground Storage Tanks (OUST)
and Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know
(EPCRA) Hotlines were established to respond to inquiries
from the regulated community and the public concerning
waste management and disposal regulations. The Hotline
also serves as a referral point on the availability and distribu-
tion of program related documents and published materials.
The document is a compilation of questions and answers,
Federal Register summaries from individual Monthly Hotline
Reports for the period of January to December 1991. It also
contains user-friendly indices which are arranged according
to subject matter, regulatory and statory citations. The docu-
ment can be used by its reader to explore the application of
the regulations in different scenarios or to shed light on com-
plex issues. Neither the questions nor the FR summaries are
intended to fully represent or be used in place of the regula-
tions. For an understanding of the actual regulatory require-
ments in any given situation, the reader must consult the ap-
propriate sections of Title 40 of the Code of Federal Regula-
tions, pertinent FR and EPA guidance documents, as well as
relevant State regulations.
Specifications: Sponsored by Environmental Protection
Agency, Washington, DC. Office of Solid Waste and Emer-
gency Response. 72p.
Subject index keywords: Information management, Waste
management, Regulations.
0141 Inside the Hotline: A Compilation of 1992 Monthly
Hotline Reports
Order Number PB93-159572CDH, price: PC A05/MF A01
Booz-Allen and Hamilton, Inc., Bethesda, MD.; Environmental
Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of Solid Waste
and Emergency Response; Mar 93
The document is a compilation of questions and answers,
Federal Register summaries from individual monthly Hotline
reports for the period of January to December 1992. It in-
cludes indices arranged by subject, regulatory citation, and
statutory citation. The reader can use the document to ex-
plore the application of the regulations to different scenarios
or to shed light on complex issues. Neither the answers to
questions nor the Federal Register summaries are intended
to fully represent or to be used in place of the regulations.
Specifications: See also PB92-131390. Sponsored by Envi-
ronmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response. 90p.
Subject! index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste man-
agement, Regulations, Waste disposal.
0142 NACEPT Committee Recommendations to
Administrator Browner
Order Number PB94-963211CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 4 Oct 93
The subgroup was charged with working on five distinct but
interrelated issues: Community Involvement/Empowerment;
Non-Discriminatory Implementation and Enforcement; Eco-
nomic Restoration/Security; Redevelopment of Cleanup
Sites; and Community-wide Environmental Quality Approach
(Including synergistic effects of multiple source cleanup ac-
tivities and risk tradeoffs in remedy selection). The subgroup
has prepared a set of statements on each issue. The state-
ments seek to reflect the level of agreement and disagree-
ment on each issue, as well as present strong minority views
where appropriate.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 42p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Solid waste manage-
ment, Hazardous materials.
0143 NACEPT Materials for Meeting Held on September
20-21, 1993
Order Number PB94-963209CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Sep 93
Many affected communities believe their needs are not being
met by the Superfund (or other environmental) program. This
is particularly the case for Environmental Justice communi-
ties. In summary, the following issues have been raised re-
garding scope and established process of the Superfund pro-
gram: current benefits are generally limited to human and ec-
ological health improvements from site remediation; and cu-
mulative risk (from the site and other sources) is not often
considered in risk assessment and remedy selection at the
site, which may particularly affect minority and low income
communities.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 53p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Solid waste manage-
ment, Hazardous materials.
0144 NACEPT Meeting. Held in Crystal City, Virginia on
February 11, 1994
Order Number PB94-963238CDH, price: PC A14/MF A03
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Feb 94
The purpose of the meeting is threefold: Bob Sussman and
Elliott Laws will give an overview of the Administration's Su-
perfund bill; EPA is interested in hearing preliminary reac-
tions to the bill's provisions; and EPA wants to discuss the
role of this Committee during the next phase of Superfund
reauthorization. The following document are included for
25
-------
ADMINISTRATIVE & MANAGEMENT: Special Reports
review: The Administration's bill; The 'short' summary of the
bill; The 'regular1 summary; Carol Browner's testimony before
the Subcommittee on Transportation and Hazardous Materi-
als; A vision statement which outlines the direction of the Ad-
ministration's bill; The statement issued by Carol Browner at
the press conference held February 3, 1994; A paper ex-
plaining the funding of environmental insurance resolution
reform; and A draft agenda for the meeting on February 11.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 301 p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Pollution regulations,
Meetings.
0145 National Oil and Hazardous Substances Pollution
Contingency Plan (as Published in the Federal Register,
March 8, 1990)
Order Number PB90-160326CDH, price: PC A25/MF A03
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; 1990
The NCP is the major framework regulation for the Federal
hazardous substance response program. The NCP includes
procedures and standards for how EPA, other Federal agen-
cies, states and private parties respond under the Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act (CERCLA) to releases of hazardous substances and
under the Clean Water Act to discharges of oil. These revi-
sions clarify the 1985 NCP language, reorganize the 1985
NCP to describe more accurately the sequence of response
actions, and incorporate changes based on program experi-
ence since the 1985 revisions to the NCP.
Specifications: 577p.
Subject index keywords: Crude oil, Hazardous materials,
Water pollution, National Contingency Plan, Oil spills.
0146 National Oil and Hazardous Substances Pollution
Contingency Plan (The NCP)
Order Number PB92-963261CDH, price: PC A15/MF A03
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Jan 92
The report contains the National Oil and Hazardous Sub-
stances Pollution Contingency Plan proposed and final rules
as published in 53 FR 51394 and 55 FR 8664, respectively.
The NCP document also contains tables of contents with
specific Federal Register page references and a key terms
index.
Specifications: Available on Standing Order, deposit ac-
count required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada, and
Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 343p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Oil pollution,
Pollution abatement, Emergencies, Superfund.
0147 National Priorities List Book Set
Order Number PB91-238725CDH, price: PC$675.00
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; 1991
The report provides general Superfund background informa-
tion and descriptions of activities at each State National Pri-
orities List (NPL.) sites. The set of documents compiles State-
Specific site summary fact sheets on each site being cleaned
up under the Superfund program. The individual state sites
are available as PB91-921207, and PB91-921209 thru PB91-
921258.
Specifications: Set includes PB91-921207 and PB91-
921209 through PB91-921258. 4262p-in 51 v.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Pollution
control, Superfund.
0148 National Priorities List Sites: Alabama
Order Number PB91-921209CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01 ,
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 90
Together with the companion National Overview volume this
publication provides general Superfund background informa-
tion and descriptions of activities at each State National Pri-
orities List (NPL) site. The document is intended to clearly
describe what the problems are, what EPA and others par-
ticipating in site cleanups are doing, and how the Nation can
move ahead in solving these serious problems. The State
volume compiles site summary fact sheets on each State
site being cleaned up under the Superfund program.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 56p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Pollution
control, Alabama, Superfund, Cleanup.
0149 National Priorities List Sites: Alabama
Order Number PB92-963223CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 91
Together with the companion national overview volume the
publication provides general Superfund background informa-
tion and descriptions of activities at each State National Pri-
orities List (NPL) site. The report clearly describes what the
problems are, what EPA and others participating in site
cleanups are doing, and how the nation can move ahead in
solving these serious problems. Also included are sites sum-
mary fact sheets on each State site being cleaned up under
the Superfund program.
Specifications: Available on Standing Order, deposit ac-
count required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada, and
Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. Also available as a package con-
taining 49 NPL Sites Volumes and 1 National Overview
Volume, PB92-963253. See also PB91-921209. 64p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Pollution
control, Alabama, Superiund, National Priorities List, Clean-
up.
0150 National Priorities List Sites: Alabama, 1992
Order Number PB93-963201CDH, price:
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Dec 92
The publication provides general Superfund background in-
formation and descriptions of activities at each State Nation-
al Priorities List (NPL) site. It clearly describes what the prob-
lems are, what EPA and others participating in site cleanups
are doing, and how the nation can move ahead in solving
these serious problems. Compiles site summary fact sheets
on each State site being cleaned up under the Superfund
Program. Other individual documents are also available as.
26
-------
ADMINISTRATIVE & MANAGEMENT: Special
Reports
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. Also available as a package con-
taining 49 NPL Sites, PB93-963250. 49 issues.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Pollution
control, Alabama, Superfund, National Priorities List, Clean-
up.
0151 National Priorities List Sites: Alaska
Order Number PB91-921210CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 90
Together with the companion National Overview volume this
publication provides general Superfund background informa-
tion and descriptions of activities at each State National Pri-
orities List (NPL) site. The document is intended to clearly
describe what the problems are, what EPA and others par-
ticipating in site cleanups are doing, and how the Nation can
move ahead in solving these serious problems. The State
volume compiles site summary fact sheets on each State
site being cleaned up under the Superfund program.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 42p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Pollution
control, Alaska, Superfund, Cleanup.
0152 National Priorities List Sites: Alaska
Order Number PB92-963251CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 91
Together with the companion national overview volume the
publication provides general Superfund background informa-
tion and descriptions of activities at each State National Pri-
orities List (NPL) site. The report clearly describes what the
problems are, what EPA and others participating in site
cleanups are doing, and how the nation can move ahead in
solving these serious problems. Also included are sites sum-
mary fact sheets on each State site being cleaned up under
the Superfund program.
Specifications: Available on Standing Order, deposit ac-
count required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada, and
Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. Also available as a package con-
taining 49 NPL Sites Volumes and 1 National Overview
Volume, PB92-963253. See also PB91-921210, 53p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Pollution
control, Alaska, Superfund, National Priorities List, Cleanup.
0153 National Priorities List Sites: Alaska, 1992
Order Number PB93-963202CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Dec 92
The publication provides general Superfund background in-
formation and descriptions of activities at each State Nation-
al Priorities List (NPL) site. It clearly describes what the prob-
lems are, what EPA and others participating in site cleanups
are doing, and how the nation can move ahead in solving
these serious problems. Compiles site summary fact sheets
on each State site being cleaned up under the Superfund
Program.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. Also available as a package con-
taining 49 NPL Sites, PB93-963250. 56p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Pollution
control, Alaska, Superfund, National Priorities List, Cleanup.
0154 National Priorities List Sites: American Samoa,
Guam, and the Trust Territories
Order Number PB92-963242CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 91
Together with the companion national overview volume the
publication provides general Superfund background informa-
tion and descriptions of activities at each State National Pri-
orities List (NPL) site. The report clearly describes what the
problems are, what EPA and others participating in site
cleanups are doing, and how the nation can move ahead in
solving these serious problems. Also included are sites sum-
mary fact sheets on each State site being cleaned up under
the Superfund program.
Specifications: Available on Standing Order, deposit ac-
count required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada, and
Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. Also available as a package con-
taining 49 NPL Sites Volumes and 1 National Overview
Volume, PB92-963253. See also PB91-921258. 49p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Pollution
control, American Samoa, Guam, Superfund, National Prior-
ities List, Cleanup.
0155 National Priorities List Sites: American Samoa,
Guam and Trust Territories
Order Number PB91-921258CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 90
Together with the companion National Overview volume this
publication provides general Superfund background informa-
tion and descriptions of activities at each State National Pri-
orities List (NPL) site. The document is intended to clearly
describe what the problems are, what EPA and others par-
ticipating in site cleanups are doing, and how the Nation can
move ahead in solving these serious problems. The State
volume compiles site summary fact sheets on each State
site being cleaned up under the Superfund program.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 36p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Pollution
control, Guam and Trust Territories, Superfund, Cleanup.
0156 National Priorities List Sites: Arizona and Nevada
Order Number PB91-921211CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 90
Together with the companion National Overview volume this
publication provides general Superfund background informa-
tion and descriptions of activities at each State National Pri-
orities List (NPL) site. The document is intended to clearly
describe what the problems are, what EPA and others par-
ticipating in site cleanups are doing, and how the Nation can
27
-------
ADMINISTRATIVE & MANAGEMENT: Special Reports
move ahead in solving these serious problems. The State
volume compiles site summary fact sheets on each State
site being cleaned up under the Superfund program.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 59p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Pollution
control, Nevada, Superfund, Cleanup.
0157 National Priorities List Sites: Arizona and Nevada
Order Number PB92-963216CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 91
Together with the companion national overview volume the
publication provides general Superfund background informa-
tion and descriptions of activities at each State National Pri-
orities List (NPL) site. The report clearly describes what the
problems are, what EPA and others participating in site
cleanups are doing, and how the nation can move ahead in
solving these serious problems. Also included are sites sum-
mary fact sheets on each State site being cleaned up under
the Superfund program.
Specifications: Available on Standing Order, deposit ac-
count required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada, and
Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. Also available as a package con-
taining 49 NPL Sites Volumes and 1 National Overview
Volume, PB92-963253. See also PB91-921211. 69p.
Subject Index keywords: Hazardous materials, Pollution
control, Arizona, Nevada, Superfund, National Priorities List,
Cleanup.
0158 National Priorities List Sites: Arizona and Nevada,
1992
Order Number PB93-963204CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Dec 92
The publication provides general Superfund background in-
formation and descriptions of activities at each State Nation-
al Priorities List (NPL) site. It clearly describes what the prob-
lems are, what EPA and othersms. Compiles site summary
fact sheets on each State site being cleaned up under the
Superfund Program.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. Also available as a package con-
taining 49 NPL Sites, PB93-963250. 74p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Pollution
control, Arizona, Nevada, Superfund, National Priorities List,
Cleanup.
0159 National Priorities List Sites: Arkansas
Order Number PB91-921212CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 90
Together with the companion National Overview volume this
publication provides general Superfund background informa-
tion and descriptions of activities at each State National Pri-
orities List (NPL) site. The document is intended to clearly
describe what the problems are, what EPA and others par-
ticipating in site cleanups are doing, and how the Nation can
move ahead in solving these serious problems. The State
volume compiles site summary fact sheets on each State
site being cleaned up under the Superfund program.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 53p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Pollution
control, Arkansas, Superfund, Cleanup.
0160 National Priorities List Sites: Arkansas
Order Number PB92-963220CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 91
Together with the companion national overview volume the
publication provides general Superfund background informa-
tion and descriptions of activities at each State National Pri-
orities List (NPL) site. The report clearly describes what the
problems are, what EPA and others participating in site
cleanups are doing, and how the nation can move ahead in
solving these serious problems. Also included are sites sum-
mary fact sheets on each State site being cleaned up under
the Superfund program.
Specifications: Available on Standing Order, deposit ac-
count required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada, and
Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. Also available as a package con-
taining 49 NPL Sites Volumes and 1 National Overview
Volume, PB92-963253. See also PB91-921212. 63p. •
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Pollution
control, Arkansas, Superfund, National Priorities List, Clean-
up.
0161 National Priorities List Sites: Arkansas, 1992
Order Number PB93-963205CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Dec 92
The publication provides general Superfund background in-
formation and descriptions of activities at each State Nation-
al Priorities List (NPL) site. It clearly describes what the prob-
lems are, what EPA and others participating in site cleanups
are doing, and how the nation can move ahead in solving
these serious problems. Compiles site summary fact sheets
on each State site being cleaned up under the Superfund
Program.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. Also available as a package con-
taining 49 NPL Sites, PB93-963250. 61 p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Pollution
control, Arkansas, Superfund, National Priorities List, Clean-
up.
0162 National Priorities List Sites: California
Order Number PB91-921213CDH, price: PC A10/MF A02
Environmental.Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 90
Together with the companion National Overview volume this
publication provides general Superfund background informa-
tion and descriptions of activities at each State National Pri-
orities List (NPL) site. The document is intended to clearly
describe what the problems are, what EPA and others par-
ticipating in site cleanups are doing, and how the Nation can
28
-------
ADMINISTRATIVE & MANAGEMENT: Special
Reports
move ahead in solving these serious problems. The State
volume compiles site summary fact sheets on each State
site being cleaned up under the Superfund program.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 222p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Pollution
control, California, Superfund, Cleanup.
0163 National Priorities List Sites: California and Hawaii
Order Number PB92-963239CDH, price: PC A11/MF A03
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 91
Together with the companion national overview volume the
publication provides general Superfund background informa-
tion and descriptions of activities at each State National Pri-
orities List (NPL) site. The report clearly describes what the
problems are, what EPA and others participating in site
cleanups are doing, and how the nation can move ahead in
solving these serious problems. Also included are sites sum-
mary fact sheets on each State site being cleaned up under
the Superfund program.
Specifications: Available on Standing Order, deposit ac-
count required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada, and
Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. Also available as a package con-
taining 49 NPL Sites Volumes and 1 National Overview
Volume, PB92-963253. See also PB91-921213. 232p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Pollution
control, California, Hawaii, Superfund, National Priorities List,
Cleanup.
0164 National Priorities List Sites: California and Hawaii,
1992
Order Number PB93-963206CDH, price: PC A12/MF A03
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Dec 92
The publication provides general Superfund background in-
formation and descriptions of activities at each State Nation-
al Priorities List (NPL) site. It clearly describes what the prob-
lems are, what EPA and others participating in site cleanups
are doing, and how the nation can move ahead in solving
these serious problems. Compiles site summary fact sheets
on each State site being cleaned up under the Superfund
Program.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. Also available as a package con-
taining 49 NPL Sites, PB93-963250. 261 p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Pollution
control, California, Hawaii, Superfund, National Priorities List,
Cleanup.
0165 National Priorities List Sites: Colorado
Order Number PB91-921214CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 90
Together with the companion National Overview volume this
publication provides general Superfund background informa-
tion and descriptions of activities at each State National Pri-
orities List (NPL) site. The document is intended to clearly
describe what the problems are, what EPA and others par-
ticipating in site cleanups are doing, and how the Nation can
move ahead in solving these serious problems. The State
volume compiles site summary fact sheets on each State
site being cleaned up under the Superfund program.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 70p.
Subject: index keywords: Hazardous materials, Pollution
control, Colorado, Superfund, Cleanup.
0166 National Priorities List Sites: Colorado
Order Number PB92-963237CDH, price: PC A05/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 91
Together with the companion national overview volume the
publication provides general Superfund background informa-
tion and descriptions of activities at each State National Pri-
orities List (NPL) site. The report clearly describes what the
problems are, what EPA and others participating in site
cleanups are doing, and how the nation can move ahead in
solving these serious problems. Also included are sites sum-
mary fact sheets on each State site being cleaned up under
the Superfund program.
Specifications: Available on Standing Order, deposit ac-
count required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada, and
Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. Also available as a package con-
taining 49 NPL Sites Volumes and 1 National Overview
Volume, PB92-963253. See also PB91-921214. 79p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Pollution
control, Colorado, Superfund, National Priorities List, Clean-
up.
0167 National Priorities List Sites: Colorado, 1992
Order Number PB93-963207CDH, price: PC A05/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Dec 92
The publication provides general Superfund background in-
formation and descriptions of activities at each State Nation-
al Priorities List (NPL) site. It clearly describes what the prob-
lems are, what EPA and others participating in site cleanups
are doing, and how the nation can move ahead in solving
these serious problems. Compiles site summary fact sheets
on each State site being cleaned up under the Superfund
Program.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. Also available as a package con-
taining 49 NPL Sites, PB93-963250. 88p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Pollution
control, Colorado, Superfund, National Priorities List, Clean-
up.
0168 National Priorities List Sites: Connecticut
Order Number PB91-921215CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 90
Together with the companion National Overview volume this
publication provides general Superfund background informa-
tion and descriptions of activities at each State National Pri-
orities List (NPL) site. The document is intended to clearly
29
-------
ADMINISTRATIVE & MANAGEMENT: Special Reports
describe what the problems are, what EPA and others par-
ticipating in site cleanups are doing, and how the Nation can
move ahead in solving these serious problems. The State
volume compiles site summary fact sheets on each State
site being cleaned up under the Superfund program.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 59p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Pollution
control, Connecticut, Superfund, Cleanup.
0169 National Priorities List Sites: Connecticut
Order Number PB92-963203CDH, price:
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 91
Together with the companion national overview volume the
publication provides general Superfund background informa-
tion and descriptions of activities at each State National Pri-
orities List (NPL) site. The report clearly describes what the
problems are, what EPA and others participating in site
cleanups are doing, and how the nation can move ahead in
solving these serious problems. Also included are sites sum-
mary fact sheets on each State site being cleaned up under
the Superfund program.
Specifications: Available on Standing Order, deposit ac-
count required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada, and
Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. Also available as a package con-
taining 49 NPL Sites Volumes and 1 National Overview
Volume, PB92-963253. See also PB91-921215. 49 issues.
Subject Index keywords: Hazardous materials, Pollution
control, Connecticut, Superfund, National Priorities List,
Cleanup.
0170 National Priorities List Sites: Connecticut, 1992
Order Number PB93-963208CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Dec 92
The publication provides general Superfund background in-
formation and descriptions of activities at each State Nation-
al Priorities List (NPL) site. It clearly describes what the prob-
lems are, what EPA and others participating in site cleanups
are doing, and how the nation can move ahead in solving
these serious problems. Compiles site summary fact sheets
on each State site being cleaned up under the Superfund
Program.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. Also available as a package con-
taining 49 NPL Sites, PB93-963250. 73p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Pollution
control, Connecticut, Superfund, National Priorities List,
Cleanup.
0171 National Priorities List Sites: Delaware
Order Number PB91-921216CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 90
Together with the companion National Overview volume this
publication provides general Superfund background informa-
tion and descriptions of activities at each State National Pri-
orities List (NPL) site. The document is intended to clearly
describe what the problems are, what EPA and others par-
ticipating in site cleanups are doing, and how the Nation can
move ahead in solving these serious problems. The State
volume compiles site summary fact sheets on each State
site being cleaned up under the Superfund program.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 75p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Pollution
control, Delaware, Superfund, Cleanup.
0172 National Priorities List Sites: Delaware
Order Number PB92-963228CDH, price: PC A05/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 91
Together with the companion national overview volume the
publication provides general Superfund background informa-
tion and descriptions of activities at each State National Pri-
orities List (NPL) site. The report clearly describes what the
problems are, what EPA and others participating in site
cleanups are doing, and how the nation can move ahead in
solving these serious problems. Also included are sites sum-
mary fact sheets on each State site being cleaned up under
the Superfund program.
Specifications: Available on Standing Order, deposit ac-
count required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada, and
Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. Also available as a package con-
taining 49 NPL Sites Volumes and 1 National Overview
Volume, PB92-963253. See also PB91-921216. 82p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Pollution
control, Delaware, Superfund, National Priorities List, Clean-
up.
0173 National Priorities List Sites: Delaware, 1992
Order Number PB93-963209CDH, price: PC A05/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Dec 92
The publication provides general Superfund background in-
formation and descriptions of activities at each State Nation-
al Priorities List (NPL) site. It clearly describes what the prob-
lems are, what EPA and others participating in site cleanups
are doing, and how the nation can move ahead in solving
these serious problems. Compiles site summary fact sheets
on each State site being cleaned up under the Superfund
Program.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. Also available as a package con-
taining 49 NPL Sites, PB93-963250. 90p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Pollution
control, Delaware, Superfund, National Priorities List, Clean-
up.
0174 National Priorities List Sites: Florida
Order Number PB91-921217CDH, price: PC A07/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 90
Together with the companion National Overview volume this
publication provides general Superfund background informa-
tion and descriptions of activities at each State National Pri-
30
-------
ADMINISTRATIVE & MANAGEMENT: Special
Reports
orities List (NPL) site. The document is intended to clearly
describe what the problems are, what EPA and others par-
ticipating in site cleanups are doing, and how the Nation can
move ahead in solving these serious problems. The State
volume compiles site summary fact sheets on each State
site being cleaned up under the Superfund program.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 147p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Pollution
control, Florida, Superfund, Cleanup.
0175 National Priorities List Sites: Florida
Order Number PB92-963250CDH, price: PC A08/MF A02
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 91
Together with the companion national overview volume the
publication provides general Superfund background informa-
tion and descriptions of activities at each State National Pri-
orities List (NPL) site. The report clearly describes what the
problems are, what EPA and others participating in site
cleanups are doing, and how the nation can move ahead in
solving these serious problems. Also included are sites sum-
mary fact sheets on each State site being cleaned up under
the Superfund program.
Specifications: Available on Standing Order, deposit ac-
count required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada, and
Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. Also available as a package con-
taining 49 NPL Sites Volumes and 1 National Overview
Volume, PB92-963253. See also PB91-921217. 152p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Pollution
control, Florida, Superfund, National Priorities List, Cleanup.
0176 National Priorities List Sites: Florida, 1992
Order Number PB93-963210CDH, price: PC A08/MF A02
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Dec 92
The publication provides general Superfund background in-
formation and descriptions of activities at each State Nation-
al Priorities List (NPL) site. It clearly describes what the prob-
lems are, what EPA and others participating in site cleanups
are doing, and how the nation can move ahead in solving
these serious problems. Compiles site summary fact sheets
on each State site being cleaned up under the Superfund
Program.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. Also available as a package con-
taining 49 NPL Sites, PB93-963250. 168p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Pollution
control, Florida, Superfund, National Priorities List, Cleanup.
0177 National Priorities List Sites: Georgia
Order Number PB91-921218CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 90
Together with the companion National Overview volume this
publication provides general Superfund background informa-
tion and descriptions of activities at each State National Pri-
orities List (NPL) site. The document is intended to clearly
describe what the problems are, what EPA and others par-
ticipating in site cleanups are doing, and how the Nation can
move ahead in solving these serious problems. The State
volume compiles site summary fact sheets on each State
site being cleaned up under the Superfund program.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 59p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Pollution
control, Georgia, Superfund, Cleanup.
0178 National Priorities List Sites: Georgia
Order Number PB92-963226CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 91
Together with the companion national overview volume the
publication provides general Superfund background informa-
tion and descriptions of activities at each State National Pri-
orities List (NPL) site. The report clearly describes what the
problems are, what EPA and others participating in site
cleanups are doing, and how the nation can move ahead in
solving these serious problems. Also included are sites sum-
mary fact sheets on each State site being cleaned up under
the Superfund program.
Specifications: Available on Standing Order, deposit ac-
count required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada, and
Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. Also available as a package con-
taining 49 NPL Sites Volumes and 1 National Overview
Volume, PB92-963253. See also PB91-921218. 68p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Pollution
control, Georgia, Superfund, National Priorities List, Cleanup.
0179 National Priorities List Sites: Georgia, 1992
Order Number PB93-963211CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Dec 92
The publication provides general Superfund background in-
formation and descriptions of activities at each State Nation-
al Priorities List (NPL) site. It clearly describes what the prob-
lems are, what EPA and others participating in site cleanups
are doing, and how the nation can move ahead in solving
these serious problems. Compiles site summary fact sheets
on each State site being cleaned up under the Superfund
Program.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
'. paper copy or microfiche. Also available as a package con-
taining 49 NPL Sites, PB93-963250. 70p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Pollution
control, Georgia, Superfund, National Priorities List, Cleanup.
0180 National Priorities List Sites: Hawaii
Order Number PB91-921219CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 90
Together with the companion National Overview volume this
publication provides general Superfund background informa-
tion and descriptions of activities at each State National Pri-
orities List (NPL) site. The document is intended to clearly
describe what the problems are, what EPA and others par-
ticipating in site cleanups are doing, and how the Nation can
31
-------
ADMINISTRATIVE & MANAGEMENT: Special Reports
move ahead in solving these serious problems. The State
volume compiles site summary fact sheets on each State
site being cleaned up under the Superfund program.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 43p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Pollution
control, Hawaii, Superfund, Cleanup.
0181 National Priorities List Sites: Idaho
Order Number PB91-921220CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 90
Together with the companion National Overview volume this
publication provides general Superfund background informa-
tion and descriptions of activities at each State National Pri-
orities List (NPL) site. The document is intended to clearly
describe what the problems are, what EPA and others par-
ticipating in site cleanups are doing, and how the Nation can
move ahead in solving these serious problems. The State
volume compiles site summary fact sheets on each State
site being cleaned up under the Superfund program.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 50p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Pollution
control, Idaho, Superfund, Cleanup.
0182 National Priorities List Sites: Idaho
Order Number PB92-963219CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 91
Together with the companion national overview volume the
publication provides general Superfund background informa-
tion and descriptions of activities at each State National Pri-
orities List (NPL) site. The report clearly describes what the
problems are, what EPA and others participating in site
cleanups are doing, and how the nation can move ahead in
solving these serious problems. Also included are sites sum-
mary fact sheets on each State site being cleaned up under
the Superfund program.
Specifications: Available on Standing Order, deposit ac-
count required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada, and
Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. Also available as a package con-
taining 49 NPL Sites Volumes and 1 National Overview
Volume, PB92-963253. See also PB91-921220. 60p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Pollution
control, Idaho, Superfund, National Priorities List, Cleanup.
0183 National Priorities List Sites: Idaho, 1992
Order Number PB93-963212CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Dec 92
The publication provides general Superfund background in-
formation and descriptions of activities at each State Nation-
al Priorities List (NPL) site. It clearly describes what the prob-
lems are, what EPA and others participating in site cleanups
are doing, and how the nation can move ahead in solving
these serious problems. Compiles site summary fact sheets
on each State site being cleaned up under the Superfund
Program.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. Also available as a package con-
taining 49 NPL Sites, PB93-963250. 62p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Pollution
control, Idaho, Superfund, National Priorities List, Cleanup.
0184 National Priorities List Sites: Illinois
Order Number PB91-921221CDH, price: PC A06/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 90
Together with the companion National Overview volume this
publication provides general Superfund background informa-
tion and descriptions of activities at each State National Pri-
orities List (NPL) site. The document is intended to clearly
describe what the problems are, what EPA and others par-
ticipating in site cleanups are doing, and how the Nation can
move ahead in solving these serious problems. The State
volume compiles site summary fact sheets on each State
site being cleaned up under the Superfund program.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 111 p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Pollution
control, Illinois, Superfund, Cleanup.
0185 National Priorities List Sites: Illinois
Order Number PB92-963248CDH, price: PC A06/MF A02
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 91
Together with the companion national overview volume the
publication provides general Superfund background informa-
tion and descriptions of activities at each State National Pri-
orities List (NPL) site. The report clearly describes what the
problems are, what EPA and others participating in site
cleanups are doing, and how the nation can move ahead in
solving these serious problems. Also included are sites sum-
mary fact sheets on each State site being cleaned up under
the Superfund program.
Specifications: Available on Standing Order, deposit ac-
count required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada, and
Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. Also available as a package con-
taining 49 NPL Sites Volumes and 1 National Overview
Volume, PB92-963253. See also PB91 -921221. 117p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Pollution
control, Illinois, Superfund, National Priorities List, Cleanup.
0186 National Priorities List Sites: Illinois, 1992
Order Number PB93-963213CDH, price: PC A06/MF A02
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Dec 92
The publication provides general Superfund background in-
formation and descriptions of activities at each State Nation-
al Priorities List (NPL) site. It clearly describes what the prob-
lems are, what EPA and others participating in site cleanups
are doing, and how the nation can move ahead in solving
these serious problems. Compiles site summary fact sheets
on each State site being cleaned up under the Superfund
Program.
32
-------
ADMINISTRATIVE & MANAGEMENT: Special
Reports
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. Also available as a package con-
taining 49 NPL Sites, PB93-963250. 120p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Pollution
control, Illinois, Superfund, National Priorities List, Cleanup.
0187 National Priorities List Sites: Indiana
Order Number PB91-921222CDH, price: PC A06/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 90
Together with the companion National Overview volume this
publication provides general Superfund background informa-
tion and descriptions of activities at each State National Pri-
orities List (NPL) site. The document is intended to clearly
describe what the problems are, what EPA and others par-
ticipating in site cleanups are doing, and how the Nation can
move ahead in solving these serious problems. The State
volume compiles site summary fact sheets on each State
site being cleaned up under the Superfund program.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 108p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Pollution
control, Indiana, Superfund, Cleanup.
0188 National Priorities List Sites: Indiana
Order Number PB92-963249CDH, price: PC A06/MF A02
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 91
Together with the companion national overview volume the
publication provides general Superfund background informa-
tion and descriptions of activities at each State National Pri-
orities List (NPL) site. The report clearly describes what the
problems are, what EPA and others participating in site
cleanups are doing, and how the nation can move ahead in
solving these serious problems. Also included are sites sum-
mary fact sheets on each State site being cleaned up under
the Superfund program.
Specifications: Available on Standing Order, deposit ac-
count required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada, and
Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. Also available as a package con-
taining 49 NPL Sites Volumes and 1 National Overview
Volume, PB92-963253. See also PB91-921222. 113p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Pollution
control, Indiana, Superfund, National Priorities List, Cleanup.
0189 National Priorities List Sites: Indiana, 1992
Order Number PB93-963214CDH, price: PC A06/MF A02
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Dec 92
The publication provides general Superfund background in-
formation and descriptions of activities at each State Nation-
al Priorities List (NPL) site. It clearly describes what the prob-
lems are, what EPA and others participating in site cleanups
are doing, and how the nation can move ahead in solving
these serious "problems. Compiles site summary fact sheets
on each State site being cleaned up under the Superfund
Program.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. Also available as a package con-
taining 49 NPL Sites, PB93-963250. 120p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Pollution
control, Indiana, Superfund, National Priorities List, Cleanup.
0190 National Priorities List Sites: Iowa
Order Number PB91-921223CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 90
Together with the companion National Overview volume this
publication provides general Superfund background informa-
tion and descriptions of activities at each State National Pri-
orities List (NPL) site. The document is intended to clearly
describe what the problems are, what EPA and others par-
ticipating in site cleanups are doing, and how the Nation can
move ahead in solving these serious problems. The State
volume compiles site summary fact sheets on each State
site being cleaned up under the Superfund program.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 75p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Pollution
control, Iowa, Superfund, Cleanup.
0191 National Priorities List Sites: Iowa
Order Number PB92-963234CDH, price: PC A05/MF A02
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 91
Together with the companion national overview volume the
publication provides general Superfund background informa-
tion and descriptions of activities at each State National Pri-
orities List (NPL) site. The report clearly describes what the
problems are, what EPA and others participating in site
cleanups are doing, and how the nation can move ahead in
solving these serious problems. Also included are sites sum-
mary fact sheets on each State site being cleaned up under
the Superfund program.
Specifications: Available on Standing Order, deposit ac-
count required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada, and
Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. Also available as a package con-
taining 49 NPL Sites Volumes and 1 National Overview
Volume, PB92-963253. See also PB91-921223. 80p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Pollution
control, Iowa, Superfund, National Priorities List, Cleanup.
0192 National Priorities List Sites: Iowa, 1992
Order Number PB93-963215CDH, price: PC A05/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Dec 92
The publication provides general Superfund background in-
formation and descriptions of activities at each State Nation-
al Priorities List (NPL) site. It clearly describes what the prob-
lems are, what EPA and others participating in site cleanups
are doing, and how the nation can move ahead in solving
these serious problems. Compiles site summary fact sheets
on each State site being cleaned up under the Superfund
Program.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
33
-------
ADMINISTRATIVE & MANAGEMENT: Special Reports
paper copy or microfiche. Also available as a package con-
taining 49 NPL Sites, PB93-963250. 78p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Pollution
control, Iowa, Superfund, National Priorities List, Cleanup.
0193 National Priorities List Sites: Kansas
Order Number PB91-921224CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 90
Together with the companion National Overview volume this
publication provides general Superfund background informa-
tion and descriptions of activities at each State National Pri-
orities List (NPL) site. The document is intended to clearly
describe what the problems are, what EPA and others par-
ticipating in site cleanups are doing, and how the Nation can
move ahead in solving these serious problems. The State
volume compiles site summary fact sheets on each State
site being cleaned up under the Superfund program.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 53p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Pollution
control, Kansas, Superfund, Cleanup.
0194 National Priorities List Sites: Kansas
Order Number PB92-963213CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 91
Together with the companion national overview volume the
publication provides general Superfund background informa-
tion and descriptions of activities at each State National Pri-
orities List (NPL) site. The report clearly describes what the
problems are, what EPA and others participating in site
cleanups are doing, and how the nation can move ahead in
solving these serious problems. Also included are sites sum-
mary fact sheets on each State site being cleaned up under
the Superfund program.
Specifications: Available on Standing Order, deposit ac-
count required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada, and
Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. Also available as a package con-
taining 49 NPL Sites Volumes and 1 National Overview
Volume, PB92-963253. See also PB91-921224. 64p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Pollution
control, Kansas, Superfund, National Priorities List, Cleanup.
0195 National Priorities List Sites: Kansas, 1992
Order Number PB93-963216CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Dec 92
The publication provides general Superfund background in-
formation and descriptions of activities at each State Nation-
al Priorities List (NPL) site. It clearly describes what the prob-
lems are, what EPA and others participating in site cleanups
are doing, and how the nation can move ahead in solving
these serious problems. Compiles site summary fact sheets
on each State site being cleaned up under the Superfund
Program.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. Also available as a package con-
taining 49 NPL Sites, PB93-963250. 59p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Pollution
control, Kansas, Superfund, National Priorities List, Cleanup.
0196 National Priorities List Sites: Kentucky
Order Number PB91-921225CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 90
Together with the companion National Overview volume this
publication provides general Superfund background informa-
tion and descriptions of activities at each State National Pri-
orities List (NPL) site. The document is intended to clearly
describe what the problems are, what EPA and others par-
ticipating in site cleanups are doing, and how the Nation can
move ahead in solving these serious problems. The State
volume compiles site summary fact sheets on each State
site being cleaned up under the Superfund program.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 66p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Pollution
control, Kentucky, Superfund, Cleanup.
0197 National Priorities List Sites: Kentucky
Order Number PB92-963227CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 91
Together with the companion national overview volume the
publication provides general Superfund background informa-
tion and descriptions of activities at each State National Pri-
orities List (NPL) site. The report clearly describes what the
problems are, what EPA and others participating in site
cleanups are doing, and how the nation can move ahead in
solving these serious problems. Also included are sites sum-
mary fact sheets on each State site being cleaned up under
the Superfund program.
Specifications: Available on Standing Order, deposit ac-
count required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada, and
Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. Also available as a package con-
taining 49 NPL Sites Volumes and 1 National Overview
Volume, PB92-963253. See also PB91-921225. 75p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Pollution
control, Kentucky, Superfund, National Priorities List, Clean-
up.
0198 National Priorities List Sites: Kentucky, 1992
Order Number PB93-963217CDH, price: PC A05/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Dec 92
The publication provides general Superfund background in-
formation and descriptions of activities at each State Nation-
al Priorities List (NPL) site. It clearly describes what the prob-
lems are, what EPA and others participating in site cleanups
are doing, and how the nation can move ahead in solving
these serious problems. Compiles site summary fact sheets
on each State site being cleaned up under the Superfund
Program.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. Also available as a package con-
taining 49 NPL Sites, PB93-963250. 82p.
34
-------
ADMINISTRATIVE & MANAGEMENT: Special
Reports
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Pollution
control, Kentucky, Superfund, National Priorities List, Clean-
up.
0199 National Priorities List Sites: Louisiana
Order Number PB91-921226CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 90
Together with the companion National Overview volume this
publication provides general Superfund background informa-
tion and descriptions of activities at each State National Pri-
orities List (NPL) site. The document is intended to clearly
describe what the problems are, what EPA and others par-
ticipating in site cleanups are doing, and how the Nation can
move ahead in solving these serious problems. The State
volume compiles site summary fact sheets on each State
site being cleaned up under the Superfund program.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 53p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Pollution
control, Louisiana, Superfund, Cleanup.
0200 National Priorities List Sites: Louisiana
Order Number PB92-963222CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 91
Together with the companion national overview volume the
publication provides general Superfund background informa-
tion and descriptions of activities at each State National Pri-
orities List (NPL) site. The report clearly describes what the
problems are, what EPA and others participating in site
cleanups are doing, and how the nation can move ahead in
solving these serious problems. Also included are sites sum-
mary fact sheets on each State site being cleaned up under
the Superfund program.
Specifications: Available on Standing Order, deposit ac-
count required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada, and
Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. Also available as a package con-
taining 49 NPL Sites Volumes and 1 National Overview
Volume, PB92-963253. See also PB91-921226. 63p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Pollution
control, Louisiana, Superfund, National Priorities List, Clean-
up.
0201 National Priorities List Sites: Louisiana, 1992
Order Number PB93-963218CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Dec 92
The publication provides general Superfund background in-
formation and descriptions of activities at each State Nation-
al Priorities List (NPL) site. It clearly describes what the prob-
lems are, what EPA and others participating in site cleanups
are doing, and how the nation can move ahead in solving
these serious problems. Compiles site summary fact sheets
on each State site being cleaned up under the Superfund
Program.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. Also available as a package con-
taining 49 NPL Sites, PB93-963250. 64p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Pollution
control, Louisiana, Superfund, National Priorities List, Clean-
up.
0202 National Priorities List Sites: Maine
Order Number PB91-921227CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 90
Together with the companion National Overview volume this
publication provides general Superfund background informa-
tion and descriptions of activities at each State National Pri-
orities List (NPL) site. The document is intended to clearly
describe what the problems are, what EPA and others par-
ticipating in site cleanups are doing, and how the Nation can
move ahead in solving these serious problems. The State
volume compiles site summary fact sheets on each State
site being cleaned up under the Superfund program.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 55p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Pollution
control, Maine, Superfund, Cleanup.
0203 National Priorities List Sites: Maine
Order Number PB92-963204CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 91
Together with the companion national overview volume the
publication provides general Superfund background informa-
tion and descriptions of activities at each State National Pri-
orities List (NPL) site. The report clearly describes what the
problems are, what EPA and others participating in site
cleanups are doing, and how the nation can move ahead in
solving these serious problems. Also included are sites sum-
mary fact sheets on each State site being cleaned up under
the Superfund program.
Specifications: Available on Standing Order, deposit ac-
count required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada, and
Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. Also available as a package con-
taining 49 NPL Sites Volumes and 1 National Overview
Volume, PB92-963253. See also PB91-921227. 59p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Pollution
control, Maine, Superfund, National Priorities List, Cleanup.
0204 National Priorities List Sites: Maine, 1992
Order Number PB93-963219CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Dec 92
The publication provides general Superfund background in-
formation and descriptions of activities at each State Nation-
al Priorities List (NPL) site. It clearly describes what the prob-
lems are, what EPA and others participating in site cleanups
are doing, and how the nation can move ahead in solving
these serious problems. Compiles site summary fact sheets
on each State site being cleaned up under the Superfund
Program.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. Also available as a package con-
taining 49 NPL Sites, PB93-963250. 64p.
35
-------
ADMINISTRATIVE & MANAGEMENT: Special Reports
Subject Index keywords: Hazardous materials, Pollution
control, Maine, Superfund, National Priorities List, Cleanup.
0205 National Priorities List Sites: Maryland
Order Number PB91-921228CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 90
Together with the companion National Overview volume this
publication provides general Superfund background informa-
tion and descriptions of activities at each State National Pri-
orities List (NPL) site. The document is intended to clearly
describe what the problems are, what EPA and others par-
ticipating in site cleanups are doing, and how the Nation can
move ahead in solving these serious problems. The State
volume compiles site summary fact sheets on each State
site being cleaned up under the Superfund program.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada
and Mexico; all others S400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 49p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Pollution
control, Maryland, Superfund, Cleanup.
0206 National Priorities List Sites: Maryland
Order Number PB92-963218CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 91
Together with the companion national overview volume the
publication provides general Superfund background informa-
tion and descriptions of activities at each State National Pri-
orities List (NPL) site. The report clearly describes what the
problems are, what EPA and others participating in site
cleanups are doing, and how the nation can move ahead in
solving these serious problems. Also included are sites sum-
mary fact sheets on each State site being cleaned up under
the Superfund program.
Specifications: Available on Standing Order, deposit ac-
count required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada, and
Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. Also available as a package con-
taining 49 NPL Sites Volumes and 1 National Overview
Volume, PB92-963253. See also PB91-921228. 67p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Pollution
control, Maryland, Superfund, National Priorities List, Clean-
up.
0207 National Priorities List Sites: Maryland, 1992
Order Number PB93-963220CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Dec 92
The publication provides general Superfund background in-
formation and descriptions of activities at each State Nation-
al Priorities List (NPL) site. It clearly describes what the prob-
lems are, what EPA and others participating in site cleanups
are doing, and how the nation can move ahead in solving
these serious problems. Compiles site summary fact sheets
on each State site being cleaned up under the Superfund
Program.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. Also available as a package con-
taining 49 NPL Sites, PB93-963250. 68p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Pollution
control, Maryland, Superfund, National Priorities List, Clean-
up.
0208 National Priorities List Sites: Massachusetts
Order Number PB91-921229CDH, price: PC A05/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 90
Together with the companion National Overview volume this
publication provides general Superfund background informa-
tion and descriptions of activities at each State National Pri-
orities List (NPL) site. The document is intended to clearly
describe what the problems are, what EPA and others par-
ticipating in site cleanups are doing, and how the Nation can
move ahead in solving these serious problems. The State
volume compiles site summary fact sheets on each State
site being cleaned up under the Superfund program.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 90p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Pollution
control, Massachusetts, Superfund, Cleanup.
0209 National Priorities List Sites: Massachusetts
Order Number PB92-963206CDH, price: PC A05/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 91
Together with the companion national overview volume the
publication provides general Superfund background informa-
tion and descriptions of activities at each State National Pri-
orities List (NPL) site. The report clearly describes what the
problems are, what EPA and others participating in site
cleanups are doing, and how the nation can move ahead in
solving these serious problems. Also included are sites sum-
mary fact sheets on each State site being cleaned up under
the Superfund program.
Specifications: Available on Standing Order, deposit ac-
count required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada, and
Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. Also available as a package con-
taining 49 NPL Sites Volumes and 1 National Overview
Volume, PB92-963253. See also PB91-921229. 96p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Pollution
control, Puerto Rico, Superfund, National Priorities List,
Cleanup.
0210 National Priorities List Sites: Massachusetts, 1992
Order Number PB93-963221CDH, price: PC A06/MF A02
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Dec 92
The publication provides general Superfund background in-
formation and descriptions of activities at each State Nation-
al Priorities List (NPL) site. It clearly describes what the prob-
lems are, what EPA and others participating in site cleanups
are doing, and how the nation can move ahead in solving
these serious problems. Compiles site summary fact sheets
on each State site being cleaned up under the Superfund
Program.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
-------
ADMINISTRATIVE & MANAGEMENT: Special
Reports
paper copy or microfiche. Also available as a package con-
taining 49 NPL Sites, PB93-963250. 109p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Pollution
control, Massachusetts, Superfund, National Priorities List,
Cleanup.
0211 National Priorities List Sites: Michigan
Order Number PB91-921230CDH, price: PC A10/MF A02
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 90
Together with the companion National Overview volume this
publication provides general Superfund background informa-
tion and descriptions of activities at each State National Pri-
orities List (NPL) site. The document is intended to clearly
describe what the problems are, what EPA and others par-
ticipating in site cleanups are doing, and how the Nation can
move ahead in solving these serious problems. The State
volume compiles site summary fact sheets on each State
site being cleaned up under the Superfund program.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 202p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Pollution
control, Michigan, Superfund, Cleanup.
0212 National Priorities List Sites: Michigan
Order Number PB92-963247CDH, price: PC A10/MF A03
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 91
Together with the companion national overview volume the
publication provides general Superfund background informa-
tion and descriptions of activities at each State National Pri-
orities List (NPL) site. The report clearly describes what the
problems are, what EPA and others participating in site
cleanups are doing, and how the nation can move ahead in
solving these serious problems. Also included are sites sum-
mary fact sheets on each State site being cleaned up under
the Superfund program.
Specifications: Available on Standing Order, deposit ac-
count required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada, and
Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. Also available as a package con-
taining 49 NPL Sites Volumes and 1 National Overview
Volume, PB92-963253. See also PB91-921230. 205p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Pollution
control, Michigan, Superfund, National Priorities List, Clean-
up.
0213 National Priorities List Sites: Michigan, 1992
Order Number PB93-963222CDH, price: PC A10/MF A03
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Dec 92
The publication provides general Superfund background in-
formation and descriptions of activities at each State Nation-
al Priorities List (NPL) site. It clearly describes what the prob-
lems are, what EPA and others participating in site cleanups
are doing, and how the nation can move ahead in solving
these serious problems. Compiles site summary fact sheets
on each State site being cleaned up under the Superfund
Program.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. Also available as a package con-
taining 49 NPL Sites, PB93-963250. 208p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Pollution
control, Michigan, Superfund, National Priorities List, Clean-
up.
0214 National Priorities List Sites: Minnesota
Order Number PB91-921231CDH, price: PC A06/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 90
Together with the companion National Overview volume this
publication provides general Superfund background informa-
tion and descriptions of activities at each State National Pri-
orities List (NPL) site. The document is intended to clearly
describe what the problems are, what EPA and others par-
ticipating in site cleanups are doing, and how the Nation can
move ahead in solving these serious problems. The State
volume compiles site summary fact sheets on each State
site being cleaned up under the Superfund program.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 122p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Pollution
control, Minnesota, Superfund, Cleanup.
0215 National Priorities List Sites: Minnesota
Order Number PB92-963211CDH, price: PC A07/MF A02
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 91
Together with the companion national overview volume the
publication provides general Superfund background informa-
tion and descriptions of activities at each State National Pri-
orities List (NPL) site. The report clearly describes what the
problems are, what EPA and others participating in site
cleanups are doing, and how the nation can move ahead in
solving these serious problems. Also included are sites sum-
mary fact sheets on each State site being cleaned up under
the Superfund program.
Specifications: Available on Standing Order, deposit ac-
count required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada, and
Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. Also available as a package con-
taining 49 NPL Sites Volumes and 1 National Overview
Volume, PB92-963253. See also PB91-921231. 133p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Pollution
control, Minnesota, Superfund, National Priorities List, Clean-
up.
0216 National Priorities List Sites: Minnesota, 1992
Order Number PB93-963223CDH, price: PC A07/MF A02
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Dec 92
The publication provides general Superfund background in-
formation and descriptions of activities at each State Nation-
al Priorities List (NPL) site. It clearly describes what the prob-
lems are, what EPA and others participating in site cleanups
are doing, and how the nation can move ahead in solving
these serious problems. Compiles site summary fact sheets
on each State site being cleaned up under the Superfund
Program.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
37
-------
ADMINISTRATIVE & MANAGEMENT: Special Reports
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. Also available as a package con-
taining 49 NPL Sites, PB93-963250. 133p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Pollution
control, Minnesota, Superfund, National Priorities List, Clean-
up.
0217 National Priorities List Sites: Mississippi
Order Number PB91-921232CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 90
Together with the companion National Overview volume this
publication provides general Superfund background informa-
tion and descriptions of activities at each State National Pri-
orities List (NPL) site. The document is intended to clearly
describe what the problems are, what EPA and others par-
ticipating in site cleanups are doing, and how the Nation can
move ahead in solving these serious problems. The State
volume compiles site summary fact sheets on each State
site being cleaned up under the Superfund program.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 35p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Pollution
control, Mississippi, Superfund, Cleanup.
0218 National Priorities List Sites: Mississippi
Order Number PB92-963224CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 91
Together with the companion national overview volume the
publication provides general Superfund background informa-
tion and descriptions of activities at each State National Pri-
orities List (NPL) site. The report clearly describes what the
problems are, what EPA and others participating in site
cleanups are doing, and how the nation can move ahead in
solving these serious problems. Also included are sites sum-
mary fact sheets on each State site being cleaned up under
the Superfund program.
Specifications: Available on Standing Order, deposit ac-
count required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada, and
Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. Also available as a package con-
taining 49 NPL Sites Volumes and 1 National Overview
Volume, PB92-963253. See also PB91-921232. 47p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Pollution
control, Mississippi, Superfund, National Priorities List, Clean-
up.
0219 National Priorities List Sites: Mississippi, 1992
Order Number PB93-963224CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Dec 92
The publication provides general Superfund background in-
formation and descriptions of activities at each State Nation-
al Priorities List (NPL) site. It clearly describes what the prob-
lems are, what EPA and others participating in site cleanups
are doing, and how the nation can move ahead in solving
these serious problems. Compiles site summary fact sheets
on each State site being cleaned up under the Superfund
Program.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. Also available as a package con-
taining 49 NPL Sites, PB93-963250. 46p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Pollution
control, Mississippi, Superfund, National Priorities List, Clean-
up.
0220 National Priorities List Sites: Missouri
Order Number PB91-921233CDH, price: PC A05/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 90
Together with the companion National Overview volume this
publication provides general Superfund background informa-
tion and descriptions of activities at each State National Pri-
orities List (NPL) site. The document is intended to clearly
describe what the problems are, what EPA and others par-
ticipating in site cleanups are doing, and how the Nation can
move ahead in solving these serious problems. The State
volume compiles site summary fact sheets on each State
site being cleaned up under the Superfund program.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 82p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Pollution
control, Missouri, Superfund, Cleanup.
0221 National Priorities List Sites: Missouri
Order Number PB92-963214CDH, price: PC A05/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 91
Together with the companion national overview volume the
publication provides general Superfund background informa-
tion and descriptions of activities at each State National Pri-
orities List (NPL) site. The report clearly describes what the
problems are, what EPA and others participating in site
cleanups are doing, and how the nation can move ahead in
solving these serious problems. Also included are sites sum-
mary fact sheets on each State site being cleaned up under
the Superfund program.
Specifications: Available on Standing Order, deposit ac-
count required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada, and
Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. Also available as a package con-
taining 49 NPL Sites Volumes and 1 National Overview
Volume, PB92-963253. See also PB91-921233. 87p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Pollution
control, Missouri, Superfund, National Priorities List, Cleanup.
0222 National Priorities List Sites: Missouri, 1992
Order Number PB93-963225CDH, price: PC A05/MF A02
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Dec 92
The publication provides general Superfund background in-
formation and descriptions of activities at each State Nation-
al Priorities List (NPL) site. It clearly describes what the prob-
lems are, what EPA and others participating in site cleanups
are doing, and how the nation can move ahead in solving
these serious problems. Compiles site summary fact sheets
on each State site being cleaned up under the Superfund
Program.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
38
-------
ADMINISTRATIVE & MANAGEMENT: Special
Reports
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. Also available as a package con-
taining 49 NPL Sites, PB93-963250. 98p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Pollution
control, Missouri, Superfund, National Priorities List, Cleanup.
0223 National Priorities List Sites: Montana
Order Number PB91-921234CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 90
Together with the companion National Overview volume this
publication provides general Superfund background informa-
tion and descriptions of activities at each State National Pri-
orities List (NPL) site. The document is intended to clearly
describe what the problems are, what EPA and others par-
ticipating in site cleanups are doing, and how the Nation can
move ahead in solving these serious problems. The State
volume compiles site summary fact sheets on each State
site being cleaned up under the Superfund program.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 54p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Pollution
control, Montana, Superfund, Cleanup.
0224 National Priorities List Sites: Montana
Order Number PB92-963235CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 91
Together with the companion national overview volume the
publication provides general Superfund background informa-
tion and descriptions of activities at each State National Pri-
orities List (NPL) site. The report clearly describes what the
problems are, what EPA and others participating in site
cleanups are doing, and how the nation can move ahead in
solving these serious problems. Also included are sites sum-
mary fact sheets
Specifications: Available on Standing Order, deposit ac-
count required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada, and
Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. Also available as a package con-
taining 49 NPL Sites Volumes and 1 National OverView
Volume, PB92-963253. See also PB91-921234. 59p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Pollution
control, Montana, Superfund, National Priorities List, Clean-
up.
0225 National Priorities List Sites: Montana, 1992
Order Number PB93-963226CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Dec 92
The publication provides general Superfund background in-
formation and descriptions of activities at each State Nation-
al Priorities List (NPL) site. It clearly describes what the prob-
lems are, what EPA and others participating in site cleanups
are doing, and how the nation can move ahead in solving
these serious problems. Compiles site summary fact sheets
on each State site being cleaned up under the Superfund
Program.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. Also available as a package con-
taining 49 NPL Sites, PB93-963250. 56p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Pollution
control, Montana, Superfund, National Priorities List, Clean-
up.
0226 National Priorities List Sites: Nebraska
Order Number PB91-921236CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 90
Together with the companion National Overview volume this
publication provides general Superfund background informa-
tion and descriptions of activities at each State National Pri-
orities List (NPL) site. The document is intended to clearly
describe what the problems are, what EPA and others par-
ticipating in site cleanups are doing, and how the Nation can
move ahead in solving these serious problems. The State
volume compiles site summary fact sheets on each State
site being cleaned up under the Superfund program.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account'required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 43p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Pollution
control, Nebraska, Superfund, Cleanup.
0227 National Priorities List Sites: Nebraska
Order Number PB92-963233CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 91
Together with the companion national overview volume the
publication provides general Superfund background informa-
tion and descriptions of. activities at each State National Pri-
orities List (NPL) site. The report clearly describes what the
problems are, what EPA and others participating in site
cleanups are doing, and how the nation can move ahead in
solving these serious problems. Also included are sites sum-
mary fact sheets on each State site being cleaned up under
the Superfund program.
Specifications: Available on Standing Order, deposit ac-
count required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada, and
Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. Also available as a package con-
taining 49 NPL Sites Volumes and ,1 National Overview
Volume, PB92-963253. See also PB9.1-921236. 56p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Pollution
control, Nebraska, Superfund, National Priorities List, Clean-
up.
0228 National Priorities List Sites: Nebraska, 1992
Order Number PB93-963227CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Dec 92
The publication provides general Superfund background in-
formation and descriptions of activities at each State Nation-
al Priorities List (NPL) site. It clearly describes what the prob-
lems are, what EPA and others participating in site cleanups
are doing, and how the nation can move ahead in solving
these serious problems. Compiles site summary fact sheets
on each State site being cleaned up under the Superfund
Program.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
39
-------
ADMINISTRATIVE & MANAGEMENT: Special Reports
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. Also available as a package con-
taining 49 NPL Sites, PB93-963250. 60p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Pollution
control, Nebraska, Superfund, National Priorities List, Clean-
up,
0229 National Priorities List Sites: New Hampshire
Order Number PB91-921237CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 90
Together with the companion National Overview volume this
publication provides general Superfund background informa-
tion and descriptions of activities at each State National Pri-
orities List (NPL) site. The document is intended to clearly
describe what the problems are, what EPA and others par-
ticipating in site cleanups are doing, and how the Nation can
move ahead in solving these serious problems. The State
volume compiles site summary fact sheets on each State
site being cleaned up under the Superfund program.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 65p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Pollution
control, New Hampshire, Superfund, Cleanup.
0230 National Priorities List Sites: New Hampshire
Order Number PB92-963205CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 91
Together with the companion national overview volume the
publication provides general Superfund background informa-
tion and descriptions of activities at each State National Pri-
orities List (NPL) site. The report clearly describes what the
problems are, what EPA and others participating in site
cleanups are doing, and how the nation can move ahead in
solving these serious problems. Also included are sites sum-
mary fact sheets on each State site being cleaned up under
the Superfund program.
Specifications: Available on Standing Order, deposit ac-
count required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada, and
Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. Also available as a package con-
taining 49 NPL Sites Volumes and 1 National Overview
Volume, PB92-963253. See also PB91-921237. 74p.
Subject Index keywords: Hazardous materials, Pollution
control, New Hampshire, Superfund, National Priorities List,
Cleanup.
0231 National Priorities List Sites: New Hampshire, 1992
Order Number PB93-963228CDH, price: PC A05/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Dec 92
The publication provides general Superfund background in-
formation and descriptions of activities at each State Nation-
al Priorities List (NPL) site. It clearly describes what the prob-
lems are, what EPA and others participating in site cleanups
are doing, and how the nation can move ahead in solving
these serious problems. Compiles site summary fact sheets
on each State site being cleaned up under the Superfund
Program.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. Also available as a package con-
taining 49 NPL Sites, PB93-963250. 80p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Pollution
control, New Hampshire, Superfund, National Priorities List,
Cleanup.
0232 National Priorities List Sites: New Jersey
Order Number PB91-921235CDH, price: PC A13/MF A02
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 90
Together with the companion National Overview volume this
publication provides general Superfund background informa-
tion and descriptions of activities at each State National Pri-
orities List (NPL) site. The document is intended to clearly
describe what the problems are, what EPA and others par-
ticipating in site cleanups are doing, and how the Nation can
move ahead in solving these serious problems. The State
volume compiles site summary fact sheets on each State
site being cleaned up under the Superfund program.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 276p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Pollution
control, New Jersey, Superfund, Cleanup.
0233 National Priorities List Sites: New Jersey
Order Number PB92-963241CDH, price: PC A13/MF A03
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 91
Together with the companion national overview volume the
publication provides general Superfund background informa-
tion and descriptions of eictivities at each State National Pri-
orities List (NPL) site. The report clearly describes what the
problems are, what EPA and others participating in site
cleanups are doing, and how the nation can move ahead in
solving these serious problems. Also included are sites sum-
mary fact sheets on each State site being cleaned up under
the Superfund program.
Specifications: Available on Standing Order, deposit ac-
count required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada, and
Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. Also available as a package con-
taining 49 NPL Sites Volumes and 1 National Overview
Volume, PB92-963253. See also PB91-921235. 279p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Pollution
control, New Jersey, Superfund, National Priorities List,
Cleanup.
0234 National Priorities List Sites: New Jersey, 1992
Order Number PB93-963229CDH, price: PC A14/MF A03
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Dec 92
The publication provides general Superfund background in-
formation and descriptions of activities at each State Nation-
al Priorities List (NPL) site. It clearly describes what the prob-
lems are, what EPA and others participating in site cleanups
are doing, and how the nation can move ahead in solving
these serious problems. Compiles site summary fact sheets
on each State site being cleaned up under the Superfund
Program.
40
-------
ADMINISTRATIVE & MANAGEMENT: Special
Reports
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. Also available as a package con-
taining 49 NPL Sites, PB93-963250. 314p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Pollution
control, New Jersey, Superfund, National Priorities List,
Cleanup.
0235 National Priorities List Sites: New Mexico
Order Number PB91-921238CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 90
Together with the companion National Overview volume this
publication provides general Superfund background informa-
tion and descriptions of activities at each State National Pri-
orities List (NPL) site. The document is intended to clearly
describe what the problems are, what EPA and others par-
ticipating in site cleanups are doing, and how the Nation can
move ahead in solving these serious problems. The State
volume compiles site summary fact sheets on each State
site being cleaned up under the Superfund program.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 51 p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Pollution
control, New Mexico, Superfund, Cleanup.
0236 National Priorities List Sites: New Mexico
Order Number PB92-963232CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 91
Together with the companion national overview volume the
publication provides general Superfund background informa-
tion and descriptions of activities at each State National Pri-
orities List (NPL) site. The report clearly describes what the
problems are, what EPA and others participating in site
cleanups are doing, and how the nation can move ahead in
solving these serious problems. Also included are sites sum-
mary fact sheets on each State site being cleaned up under
the Superfund program.
Specifications: Available on Standing Order, deposit ac-
count required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada, and
Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. Also available as a package con-
taining 49 NPL Sites Volumes and 1 National Overview
Volume, PB92-963253. See also PB91-921238. 61 p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Pollution
control, New Mexico, Superfund, National Priorities List,
Cleanup.
0237 National Priorities List Sites: New Mexico, 1992
Order Number PB93-963230CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Dec 92
The publication provides general Superfund background in-
formation and descriptions of activities at each State Nation-
al Priorities List (NPL) site. It clearly describes what the prob-
lems are, what EPA and others participating in site cleanups
are doing, and how the nation can move ahead in solving
these serious problems. Compiles site summary fact sheets
on each State site being cleaned up under the Superfund
Program.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. Also available as a package con-
taining 49 NPL Sites, PB93-963250. 56p.
Subject: index keywords: Hazardous materials, Pollution
control, New Mexico, Superfund, National Priorities List,
Cleanup.
0238 National Priorities List Sites: New York
Order Number PB91-921239CDH, price: PC A10/MF A02
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 90
Together with the companion National Overview volume this
publication provides general Superfund background informa-
tion and descriptions of activities at each State National Pri-
orities List (NPL) site. The document is intended to clearly
describe what the problems are, what EPA and others par-
ticipating in site cleanups are doing, and how the Nation can
move ahead in solving these serious problems. The State
volume compiles site summary fact sheets on each State
site being cleaned up under the Superfund program.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 209p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Pollution
control, New York, Superfund, Cleanup.
0239 National Priorities List Sites: New York
Order Number PB92-963208CDH, price: PC A10/MF A03
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 91
Together with the companion national overview volume the
publication provides general Superfund background informa-
tion and descriptions of activities at each State National Pri-
orities List (NPL) site. The report clearly describes what the
problems are, what EPA and others participating in site
cleanups are doing, and how the nation can move ahead in
solving these serious problems. Also included are sites sum-
mary fact sheets on each State site being cleaned up under
the Superfund program.
Specifications: Available on Standing Order, deposit ac-
count required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada, and
Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. Also available as a package con-
taining 49 NPL Sites Volumes and 1 National Overview
Volume, PB92-963253. See also PB91-921239. 216p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Pollution
control, New York, Superfund, National Priorities List, Clean-
up.
0240 National Priorities List Sites: New York, 1992
Order Number PB93-963231CDH, price: PC A11/MF A03
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Dec 92
The publication provides general Superfund background in-
formation and descriptions of activities at each State Nation-
al Priorities List (NPL) site. It clearly describes what the prob-
lems are, what EPA and others participating in site cleanups
are doing, and how the nation can move ahead in solving
these serious problems. Compiles site summary fact sheets
41
-------
ADMINISTRATIVE & MANAGEMENT: Special Reports
on each State site being cleaned up under the Superfund
Program.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. Also available as a package con-
taining 49 NPL Sites, PB93-963250. 238p.
Subject Index keywords: Hazardous materials, Pollution
control, New York, Superfund, National Priorities List, Clean-
up.
0241 National Priorities List Sites: North and South
Dakota
Order Number PB91-921241CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 90
Together with the companion National Overview volume this
publication provides general Superfund background informa-
tion and descriptions of activities at each State National Pri-
orities List (NPL) site. The document is intended to clearly
describe what the problems are, what EPA and others par-
ticipating in site cleanups are doing, and how the Nation can
move ahead in solving these serious problems. The State
volume compiles site summary fact sheets on each State
site being cleaned up under the Superfund program.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 42p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Pollution
control, North Dakota, South Dakota, Superfund, Cleanup.
0242 National Priorities List Sites: North and South
Dakota, 1992
Order Number PB93-963233CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Dec 92
The publication provides general Superfund background in-
formation and descriptions of activities at each State Nation-
al Priorities List (NPL) site. It clearly describes what the prob-
lems are, what EPA and others participating in site cleanups
are doing, and how the nation can move ahead in solving
these serious problems. Compiles site summary fact sheets
on each State site being cleaned up under the Superfund
Program.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. Also available as a package con-
taining 49 NPL Sites, PB93-963250. 51 p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Pollution
control, North Dakota, South Dakota, Superfund, National
Priorities List, Cleanup.
0243 National Priorities List Sites: North Carolina
Order Number PB91-921240CDH, price: PC A05/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 90
Together with the companion National Overview volume this
publication provides general Superfund background informa-
tion and descriptions of activities at each State National Pri-
orities List (NPL) site. The document is intended to clearly
describe what the problems are, what EPA and others par-
ticipating in site cleanups are doing, and how the Nation can
move ahead in solving these serious problems. The State
volume compiles site summary fact sheets on each State
site being cleaned up under the Superfund program.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 78p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Pollution
control, North Carolina, Superfund, Cleanup.
0244 National Priorities List Sites: North Carolina
Order Number PB92-963209CDH, price: PC A05/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 91
Together with the companion national overview volume the
publication provides general Superfund background informa-
tion and descriptions of activities at each State National Pri-
orities List (NPL) site. The report clearly describes what the
problems are, what EPA and others participating in site
cleanups are doing, and how the nation can move ahead in
solving these serious problems. Also included are sites sum-
mary fact sheets on each State site being cleaned up under
the Superfund program.
Specifications: Available on Standing Order, deposit ac-
count required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada, and
Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. Also available as a package con-
taining 49 NPL Sites Volumes and 1 National Overview
Volume, PB92-963253. See also PB91-921240. 87p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Pollution
control, North Carolina, Superfund, National Priorities List,
Cleanup.
0245 National Priorities List Sites: North Carolina, 1992
Order Number PB93-963232CDH, price: PC A05/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Dec 92
The publication provides general Superfund background in-
formation and descriptions of activities at each State Nation-
al Priorities List (NPL) site. It clearly describes what the prob-
lems are, what EPA and others participating in site cleanups
are doing, and how the nation can move ahead in solving
these serious problems. Compiles site summary fact sheets
on each State site being cleaned up under the Superfund
Program.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. Also available as a package con-
taining 49 NPL Sites, PB93-963250. 96p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Pollution
control, North Carolina, Superfund, National Priorities List,
Cleanup.
0246 National Priorities List Sites: North Dakota and
South Dakota
Order Number PB92-963236CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 91
Together with the companion national overview volume the
publication provides general Superfund background informa-
tion and descriptions of activities at each State National Pri-
orities List (NPL) site. The report clearly describes what the
42
-------
ADMINISTRATIVE & MANAGEMENT: Special
Reports
problems are, what EPA and others participating in site
cleanups are doing, and how the nation can move ahead in
solving these serious problems. Also included are sites sum-
mary fact sheets on each State site being cleaned up under
the Superfund program.
Specifications: Available on Standing Order, deposit ac-
count required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada, and
Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. Also available as a package con-
taining 49 NPL Sites Volumes and 1 National Overview
Volume, PB92-963253. See also PB91-921241. 55p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Pollution
control, North Dakota, Superfund, National Priorities List,
Cleanup.
0247 National Priorities List Sites: Ohio
Order Number PB91-921242CDH, price: PC A05/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 90
Together with the companion National Overview volume this
publication provides general Superfund background informa-
tion and descriptions of activities at each State National Pri-
orities List (NPL) site. The document is intended to clearly
describe what the problems are, what EPA and others par-
ticipating in site cleanups are doing, and how the Nation can
move ahead in solving these serious problems. The State
volume compiles site summary fact sheets on each State
site being cleaned up under the Superfund program.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 10Op.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Pollution
control, Ohio, Superfund, Cleanup.
0248 National Priorities List Sites: Ohio
Order Number PB92-963246CDH, price: PC A06/MF A02
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 91
Together with the companion national overview volume the
publication provides general Superfund background informa-
tion and descriptions of activities at each State National Pri-
orities List (NPL) site. The report clearly describes what the
problems are, what EPA and others participating in site
cleanups are doing, and how the nation can move ahead in
solving these serious problems. Also included are sites sum-
mary fact sheets on each State site being cleaned up under
the Superfund program.
Specifications: Available on Standing Order, deposit ac-
count required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada, and
Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. Also available as a package con-
taining 49 NPL Sites Volumes and 1 National Overview
Volume, PB92-963253. See also PB91-921242. 111p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Pollution
control, Ohio, Superfund, National Priorities List, Cleanup.
0249 National Priorities List Sites: Ohio, 1992
Order Number PB93-963234CDH, price: PC A06/MF A02
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Dec 92
The publication provides general Superfund background in-
formation and descriptions of activities at each State Nation-
al Priorities List (NPL) site. It clearly describes what the prob-
lems are, what EPA and others participating in site cleanups
are doing, and how the nation can move ahead in solving
these serious problems. Compiles site summary fact sheets
on each State site being cleaned up under the Superfund
Program.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. Also available as a package con-
taining 49 NPL Sites, PB93-963250. 117p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Pollution
control, Ohio, Superfund, National Priorities List, Cleanup.
0250 National Priorities List Sites: Oklahoma
Order Number PB91-921243CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 90
Together with the companion National Overview volume this
publication provides general Superfund background informa-
tion and descriptions of activities at each State National Pri-
orities List (NPL) site. The document is intended to clearly
describe what the problems are, what EPA and others par-
ticipating in site cleanups are doing, and how the Nation can
move ahead in solving these serious problems. The State
volume compiles site summary fact sheets on each State
site being cleaned up under the Superfund program.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 51 p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Pollution
control, Oklahoma, Superfund, Cleanup.
0251 National Priorities List Sites: Oklahoma
Order Number PB92-963221CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 91
Together with the companion national overview volume the
publication provides general Superfund background informa-
tion and descriptions of activities at each State National Pri-
orities List (NPL) site. The report clearly describes what the
problems are, what EPA and others participating in site
cleanups are doing, and how the nation can move ahead in
solving these serious problems. Also included are sites sum-
mary fact sheets on each State site being cleaned up under
the Superfund program.
Specifications: Available on Standing Order, deposit ac-
count required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada, and
Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. Also available as a package con-
taining 49 NPL Sites Volumes and 1 National Overview
Volume, PB92-963253. See also PB91-921243. 61 p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Pollution
control, Oklahoma, Superfund, National Priorities List, Clean-
up.
0252 National Priorities List Sites: Oklahoma, 1992
Order Number PB93-963235CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Dec 92
The publication provides general Superfund background in-
. formation and descriptions of activities at each State Nation-
al Priorities List (NPL) site. It clearly describes what the prob-
43
-------
ADMINISTRATIVE & MANAGEMENT: Special Reports
lems are, what EPA and others participating in site cleanups
are doing, and how the nation can move ahead in solving
these serious problems. Compiles site summary fact sheets
on each State site being cleaned up under the Superfund
Program.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. Also available as a package con-
taining 49 NPL Sites, PB93-963250. 62p.
Subject Index keywords: Hazardous materials, Pollution
control, Oklahoma, Superfund, National Priorities List, Clean-
up.
0253 National Priorities List Sites: Oregon
Order Number PB91-921244CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 90
Together with the companion National Overview volume this
publication provides general Superfund background informa-
tion and descriptions of activities at each State National Pri-
orities List (NPL) site. The document is intended to clearly
describe what the problems are, what EPA and others par-
ticipating in site cleanups are doing, and how the Nation can
move ahead in solving these serious problems. The State
volume compiles site summary fact sheets on each State
site being cleaned up under the Superfund program.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 46p.
Subject Index keywords: Hazardous materials, Pollution
control, Oregon, Superfund, Cleanup.
0254 National Priorities List Sites: Oregon
Order Number PB92-963245CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 91
Together with the companion national overview volume the
publication provides general Superfund background informa-
tion and descriptions of activities at each State National Pri-
orities List (NPL) site. The report clearly describes what the
problems are, what EPA and others participating in site
cleanups are doing, and how the nation can move ahead in
solving these serious problems. Also included are sites sum-
mary fact sheets on each State site being cleaned up under
the Superfund program.
Specifications: Available on Standing Order, deposit ac-
count required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada, and
Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. Also available as a package con-
taining 49 NPL Sites Volumes and 1 National Overview
Volume, PB92-963253. See also PB91-921244. 57p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Pollution
control, Oregon, Superfund, National Priorities List, Cleanup.
0255 National Priorities List Sites: Oregon, 1992
Order Number PB93-963236CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Dec 92
The publication provides general Superfund background in-
formation and descriptions of activities at each State Nation-
al Priorities List (NPL) site. It clearly describes what the prob-
lems are, what EPA and others participating in site cleanups
are doing, and how the nation can move ahead in solving
these serious problems. Compiles site summary fact sheets
on each State site being cleaned up under the Superfund
Program.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. Also available as a package con-
taining 49 NPL Sites, PB93-963250. 62p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Pollution
control, Oregon, Superfund, National Priorities List, Cleanup.
0256 National Priorities List Sites: Pennsylvania
Order Number PB91-921245CDH, price: PC A11/MF A02
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 90
Together with the companion National Overview volume this
publication provides general Superfund background informa-
tion and descriptions of activities at each State National Pri-
orities List (NPL) site. The document is intended to clearly
describe what the problems are, what EPA and others par-
ticipating in site cleanups are doing, and how the Nation can
move ahead in solving these serious problems. The State
volume compiles site summary fact sheets on each State
site being cleaned up under the Superfund program.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 245p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Pollution
control, Pennsylvania, Superfund, Cleanup.
0257 National Priorities List Sites: Pennsylvania
Order Number PB92-963240CDH, price: PC A11/MF A03
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 91
Together with the companion national overview volume the
publication provides general Superfund background informa-
tion and descriptions of activities at each State National Pri-
orities List (NPL) site. The report clearly describes what the
problems are, what EPA and others participating in site
cleanups are doing, and how the nation can move ahead in
solving these serious problems. Also included are sites sum-
mary fact sheets on each State site being cleaned up under
the Superfund program.
Specifications: Available on Standing Order, deposit ac-
count required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada, and
Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. Also available as a package con-
taining 49 NPL Sites Volumes and 1 National Overview
Volume, PB92-963253. See also PB91-921245. 250p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Pollution
control, Pennsylvania, Superfund, National Priorities List,
Cleanup.
0258 National Priorities List Sites: Pennsylvania, 1992
Order Number PB93-963237CDH, price: PC A12/MF A03
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Dec 92
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
44
-------
ADMINISTRATIVE & MANAGEMENT: Special
Reports
paper copy or microfiche. Also available as a package con-
taining 49 NPL Sites, PB93-963250. 272p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Pollution
control, Pennsylvania, Superfund, National Priorities List,
Cleanup.
0259 National Priorities List Sites: Puerto Rico
Order Number PB91-921257CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 90
Together with the companion National Overview volume this
publication provides general Superfund background informa-
tion and descriptions of activities at each State National Pri-
orities List (NPL) site. The document is intended to clearly
describe what the problems are, what EPA and others par-
ticipating in site cleanups are doing, and how the Nation can
move ahead in solving these serious problems. The State
volume compiles site summary fact sheets on each State
site being cleaned up under the Superfund program.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 47p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Pollution
control, Puerto Rico, Superfund, Cleanup.
0260 National Priorities List Sites: Puerto Rico
Order Number PB92-963207CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 91
Together with the companion national overview volume the
publication provides general Superfund background informa-
tion and descriptions of activities at each State National Pri-
orities List (NPL) site. The report clearly describes what the
problems are, what EPA and others participating in site
cleanups are doing, and how the nation can move ahead in
solving these serious problems. Also included are sites sum-
mary fact sheets on each State site being cleaned up under
the Superfund program.
Specifications: Available on Standing Order, deposit ac-
count required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada, and
Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. Also available as a package con-
taining 49 NPL Sites Volumes and 1 National Overview
Volume, PB92-963253. See also PB91-921257. 59p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Pollution
control, Puerto Rico, Superfund, National Priorities List,
Cleanup.
0261 National Priorities List Sites: Puerto Rico and Virgin
Islands, 1992
Order Number PB93-963238CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Dec 92
The publication provides general Superfund background in-
formation and descriptions of activities at each State Nation-
al Priorities List (NPL) site. It clearly describes what the prob-
lems are, what EPA and others participating in site cleanups
are doing, and how the nation can move ahead in solving
these serious problems. Compiles site summary fact sheets
on each State site being cleaned up under the Superfund
Program.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. Also available as a package con-
taining 49 NPL Sites, PB93-963250. 57p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Pollution
control, Puerto Rico, Virgin Islands, Superfund, National Pri-
orities List, Cleanup.
0262 National Priorities List Sites: Rhode Island
Order Number PB91-921246CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 90
Together with the companion National Overview volume this
publication provides general Superfund background informa-
tion and descriptions of activities at each State National Pri-
orities List (NPL) site. The document is intended to clearly
describe what the problems are, what EPA and others par-
ticipating in site cleanups are doing, and how the Nation can
move ahead in solving these serious problems. The State
volume compiles site summary fact sheets on each State
site being cleaned up under the Superfund program.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 54p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Pollution
control, Rhode Island, Superfund, Cleanup.
0263 National Priorities List Sites: Rhode Island
Order Number PB92-963230CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 91
Together with the companion national overview volume the
publication provides general Superfund background informa-
tion and descriptions of activities at each State National Pri-
orities List (NPL) site. The report clearly describes what the
problems are, what EPA and others participating in site
cleanups are doing, and how the nation can move ahead in
solving these serious problems. Also included are sites sum-
mary fact sheets on each State site being cleaned up under
the Superfund program.
Specifications: Available on Standing Order, deposit ac-
count required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada, and
Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. Also available as a package con-
taining 49 NPL Sites Volumes and 1 National Overview
Volume, PB92-963253. See also PB91-921246. 64p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Pollution
control, Rhode Island, Superfund, National Priorities List,
Cleanup.
0264 National Priorities List Sites: Rhode Island, 1992
Order Number PB93-963239CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Dec 92
The publication provides general Superfund background in-
formation and descriptions of activities at each State Nation-
al Priorities List (NPL) site. It clearly describes what the prob-
lems are, what EPA and others participating in site cleanups
are doing, and how the nation can move ahead in solving
these serious problems. Compiles site summary fact sheets
on each State site being cleaned up under the Superfund
Program.
45
-------
ADMINISTRATIVE & MANAGEMENT: Special Reports
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. Also available as a package con-
taining 49 NPL Sites, PB93-963250. 72p.
Subject Index keywords: Hazardous materials, Pollution
control, Rhode Island, Superfund, National Priorities List,
Cleanup.
0265 National Priorities List Sites Set (1991)
Order Number PB92-963253CDH, price: PC$750.00
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; 1991
The publications provide general Superfund background in-
formation and descriptions of activities at each State Nation-
al Priorities List (NPL) site. The report clearly describes what
the problems are, what EPA and others participating in Site
Cleanups are doing, and how the Nation can move ahead in
solving these serious problems. (The overview document,
Superfund: Focusing on the Nation at Large (1991), available
separately order as PB92-953252).
Specifications: The overview document, Superfund: Focus-
ing on the Nation at Large (1991), available separately as
PB92-953252. Set includes PB92-963204 through PB92-
963251. See also PB91-238725. 4486p-in 49v.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Pollution
control, Superfund, National Priorities List.
0266 National Priorities List Sites: South Carolina
Order Number PB91-921247CDH, price: PC A05/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 90
Together with the companion National Overview volume this
publication provides general Superfund background informa-
tion and descriptions of activities at each State National Pri-
orities List (NPL) site. The document is intended to clearly
describe what the problems are, what EPA and others par-
ticipating in site cleanups are doing, and how the Nation can
move ahead in solving these serious problems. The State
volume compiles site summary fact sheets on each State
site being cleaned up under the Superfund program.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 78p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Pollution
control, South Carolina, Superfund, Cleanup.
0267 National Priorities List Sites: South Carolina
Order Number PB92-96321OCDH, price: PC A05/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 91
Together with the companion national overview volume the
publication provides general Superfund background informa-
tion and descriptions of activities at each State National Pri-
orities List (NPL) site. The report clearly describes what the
problems are, what EPA and others participating in site
cleanups are doing, and how the nation can move ahead in
solving these serious problems. Also included are sites sum-
mary fact sheets on each State site being cleaned up under
the Superfund program.
Specifications: Available on Standing Order, deposit ac-
count required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada, and
Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. Also available as a package con-
taining 49 NPL Sites Volumes and 1 National Overview
Volume, PB92-963253. See also PB91-921247. 87p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Pollution
control, South Carolina, Superfund, National Priorities List,
Cleanup.
0268 National Priorities List Sites: South Carolina, 1992
Order Number PB93-963240CDH, price: PC A05/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Dec 92
The publication provides general Superfund background in-
formation and descriptions of activities at each State Nation-
al Priorities List (NPL) site. It clearly describes what the prob-
lems are, what EPA and others participating in site cleanups
are doing, and how the nation can move ahead in solving
these serious problems. Compiles site summary fact sheets
on each State site being cleaned up under the Superfund
Program.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. Also available as a package con-
taining 49 NPL Sites, PB93-963250. 94p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Pollution
control, South Carolina, Superfund, National Priorities List,
Cleanup.
0269 National Priorities List Sites: Tennessee
Order Number PB91-921248CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 90
Together with the companion National Overview volume this
publication provides general Superfund background informa-
tion and descriptions of activities at each State National Pri-
orities List (NPL) site.'The document is intended to clearly
describe what the problems are, what EPA and others par-
ticipating in site cleanups are doing, and how the Nation can
move ahead in solving these serious problems. The State
volume compiles site summary fact sheets on each State
site being cleaned up under the Superfund program.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiches. 61 p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Pollution
control, Tennessee, Superfund, Cleanup.
0270 National Priorities List Sites: Tennessee
Order Number PB92-96JI225CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 91
Together with the companion national overview volume the
publication provides general Superfund background informa-
tion and descriptions of activities at each State National Pri-
orities List (NPL) site. The report clearly describes what the
problems are, what EPA and others participating in site
cleanups are doing, and how the nation can move ahead in
solving these serious problems. Also included are sites sum-
mary fact sheets on each State site being cleaned up under
the Superfund program.
Specifications: Available on Standing Order, deposit ac-
count required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada, and
46
-------
ADMINISTRATIVE & MANAGEMENT: Special
Reports
Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. Also available as a package con-
taining 49 NPL Sites Volumes and 1 National Overview
Volume, PB92-963253. See also PB91-921248. 69p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Pollution
control, Tennessee, Superfund, National Priorities List,
Cleanup.
0271 National Priorities List Sites: Tennessee, 1992
Order Number PB93-963241CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Dec 92
The publication provides general Superfund background in-
formation and descriptions of activities at each State Nation-
al Priorities List (NPL) site. It clearly describes what the prob-
lems are, what EPA and others participating in site cleanups
are doing, and how the nation can move ahead in solving
these serious problems. Compiles site summary fact sheets
on each State site being cleaned up under the Superfund
Program.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. Also available as a package con-
taining 49 NPL Sites, PB93-963250. 74p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Pollution
control, Tennessee, Superfund, National Priorities List,
Cleanup.
0272 National Priorities List Sites: Texas
Order Number PB91-921249CDH, price: PC A05/MF AOi
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 90
Together with the companion National Overview volume this
publication provides general Superfund background informa-
tion and descriptions of activities at each State National Pri-
orities List (NPL) site. The document is intended to clearly
describe what the problems are, what EPA and others par-
ticipating in site cleanups are doing, and how the Nation can
move ahead in solving these serious problems. The State
volume compiles site summary fact sheets on each State
site being cleaned up under the Superfund program.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 92p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Pollution
control, Texas, Superfund, Cleanup.
0273 National Priorities List Sites: Texas
Order Number PB92-963212CDH, price: PC A06/MF A02
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 91
Together with the companion national overview volume the
publication provides general Superfund background informa-
tion and descriptions of activities at each State National Pri-
orities List (NPL) site. The report clearly describes what the
problems are, what EPA and others participating in site
cleanups are doing, and how the nation can move ahead in
solving these serious problems. Also included are sites sum-
mary fact sheets on each State site being cleaned up under
the Superfund program.
Specifications: Available on Standing Order, deposit ac-
count required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada, and
Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. Also available as a package con-
taining 49 NPL Sites Volumes and 1 National Overview
Volume, PB92-963253. See also PB91-921249. 102p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Pollution
control, Texas, Superfund, National Priorities List, Cleanup.
0274 National Priorities List Sites: Texas, 1992
Order Number PB93-963242CDH, price: PC A06/MF A02
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Dec 92
The publication provides general Superfund background in-
formation and descriptions of activities at each State Nation-
al Priorities List (NPL) site. It clearly describes what the prob-
lems are, what EPA and others participating in site cleanups
are doing, and how the nation can move ahead in solving
these serious problems. Compiles site summary fact sheets
on each State site being cleaned up under the Superfund
Program.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. Also available as a package con-
taining 49 NPL Sites, PB93-963250. 106p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Pollution
control, Texas, Superfund, National Priorities List, Cleanup.
0275 National Priorities List Sites: The United States
Territories, 1992
Order Number PB93-963203CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Dec 92
The publication provides general Superfund background in-
formation and descriptions of activities at each State Nation-
al Priorities List (NPL) site. It clearly describes what the prob-
lems are, what EPA and others participating in site cleanups
are doing, and how the nation can move ahead in solving
these serious problems. Compiles site summary fact sheets
on each State site being cleaned up under the Superfund
Program.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. Also available as a package con-
taining 49 NPL Sites, PB93-963250. 52p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Pollution
control, American Samoa, Guam, Trust territories, Superfund,
National Priorities List, Cleanup.
0276 National Priorities List Sites: Utah
Order Number PB91-921250CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 90
Together with the companion National Overview volume this
publication provides general Superfund background informa-
tion and descriptions of activities at each State National Pri-
orities'List (NPL) site. The document is intended to clearly
describe what the problems are, what EPA and others par-
ticipating in site cleanups are doing, and how the Nation can
move ahead in solving these serious problems. The State
volume compiles site summary fact sheets on each State
site being cleaned up under the Superfund program.
47
-------
ADMINISTRATIVE & MANAGEMENT: Special Reports
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 54p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Pollution
control, Utah, Superfund, Cleanup.
0277 National Priorities List Sites: Utah
Order Number PB92-963215CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 91
Together with the companion national overview volume the
publication provides general Superfund background informa-
tion and descriptions of activities at each State National Pri-
orities List (NPL) site. The report clearly describes what the
problems are, what EPA and others participating in site
cleanups are doing, and how the nation can move ahead in
solving these serious problems. Also included are sites sum-
mary fact sheets on each State site being cleaned up under
the Superfund program.
Specifications: Available on Standing Order, deposit ac-
count required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada, and
Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. Also available as a package con-
taining 49 NPL Sites Volumes and 1 National Overview
Volume, PB92-963253. See also PB91-921250. 63p.
Subject Index keywords: Hazardous materials, Pollution
control, Utah, Superfund, National Priorities List, Cleanup.
0278 National Priorities List Sites: Utah, 1992
Order Number PB93-963243CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Dec 92
The publication provides general Superfund background in-
formation and descriptions of activities at each State Nation-
al Priorities List (NPL) site. It clearly describes what the prob-
lems are, what EPA and others participating in site cleanups
are doing, and how the nation can move ahead in solving
these serious problems. Compiles site summary fact sheets
on each State site being cleaned up under the Superfund
Program.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. Also available as a package con-
taining 49 NPL Sites, PB93-963250. 64p.
Subject Index keywords: Hazardous materials, Pollution
control, Utah, Superfund, National Priorities List, Cleanup.
0279 National Priorities List Sites: Vermont
Order Number PB91-921251CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 90
Together with the companion National Overview volume this
publication provides general Superfund background informa-
tion and descriptions of activities at each State National Pri-
orities List (NPL) site. The document is intended to clearly
describe what the problems are, what EPA and others par-
ticipating in site cleanups are doing, and how the Nation can
move ahead in solving these serious problems. The State
volume compiles site summary fact sheets on each State
site being cleaned up under the Superfund program.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 45p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Pollution
control, Vermont, Superfund, Cleanup.
0280 National Priorities List Sites: Vermont
Order Number PB92-963231CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 91
Together with the companion national overview volume the
publication provides general Superfund background informa-
tion and descriptions of activities at each State National Pri-
orities List (NPL) site. The report clearly describes what the
problems are, what EPA and others participating in site
cleanups are doing, and how the nation can move ahead in
solving these serious problems. Also included are sites sum-
mary fact sheets on each State site being cleaned up under
the Superfund program.
Specifications: Available on Standing Order, deposit ac-
count required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada, and
Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. Also available as a package con-
taining 49 NPL Sites Volumes and 1 National Overview
Volume, PB92-963253. See also PB91-921251. 57p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Pollution
control, Vermont, Superfund, National Priorities List, Cleanup.
0281 National Priorities List Sites: Vermont, 1992
Order Number PB93-963244CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Dec 92
The publication provides general Superfund background in-
formation and descriptions of activities at each State Nation-
al Priorities List (NPL) site. It clearly describes what the prob-
lems are, what EPA and others participating in site cleanups
are doing, and how the nation can move ahead in solving
these serious problems. Compiles site summary fact sheets
on each State site being cleaned up under the Superfund
Program.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. Also available as a package con-
taining 49 NPL Sites, PB93-963250. 58p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Pollution
control, Vermont, Superfund, National Priorities List, Cleanup.
0282 National Priorities List Sites: Virginia
Order Number PB91-921252CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 90
Together with the companion National Overview volume this
publication provides general Superfund background informa-
tion and descriptions of activities at each State National Pri-
orities List (NPL) site. The document is intended to clearly
describe what the problems are, what EPA and others par-
ticipating in site cleanups are doing, and how the Nation can
move ahead in solving these serious problems. The State
volume compiles site summary fact sheets on each State
site being cleaned up under the Superfund program.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada
48
-------
ADMINISTRATIVE & MANAGEMENT: Special
Reports
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 75p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Pollution
control, Virginia, Superfund, Cleanup.
0283 National Priorities List Sites: Virginia
Order Number PB92-963217CDH, price: PC A05/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 91
Together with the companion national overview volume the
publication provides general Superfund background informa-
tion and descriptions of activities at each State National Pri-
orities List (NPL) site. The report clearly describes what the
problems are, what EPA and others participating in site
cleanups are doing, and how the nation can move ahead in
solving these serious problems. Also included are sites sum-
mary fact sheets on each State site being cleaned up under
the Superfund program.
Specifications: Available on Standing Order, deposit ac-
count required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada and
Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. Also available as a package con-
taining 49 NPL Sites Volumes and 1 National Overview
Volume, PB92-963253. See also PB91-921252. 83p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Pollution
control, Virginia, Superfund, National Priorities List, Cleanup.
0284 National Priorities List Sites: Virginia, 1992
Order Number PB93-963245CDH, price: PC A05/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Dec 92
The publication provides general Superfund background in-
formation and descriptions of activities at each State Nation-
al Priorities List (NPL) site. It clearly describes what the prob-
lems are, what EPA and others participating in site cleanups
are doing, and how the nation can move ahead in solving
these serious problems. Compiles site summary fact sheets
on each State site being cleaned up under the Superfund
Program. K
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. Also available as a packaqe con-
taining 49 NPL Sites, PB93-963250. 92p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Pollution
control, Virginia, Superfund, National Priorities List, Cleanup.
0285 National Priorities List Sites: Washington
Order Number PB91-921253CDH, price: PC A07/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 90
Together with the companion National Overview volume this
publication provides general Superfund background informa-
tion and descriptions of activities at each State National Pri-
orities List (NPL) site. The document is intended to clearly
describe what the problems are, what EPA and others par-
ticipating in site cleanups are doing, and how the Nation can
move ahead in solving these serious problems. The State
volume compiles site summary fact sheets on each State
site being cleaned up under the Superfund program.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 130p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Pollution
control, Washington(State), Superfund, Cleanup.
0286 National Priorities List Sites: Washington
Order Number PB92-963244CDH, price: PC A07/MF A02
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 91
Together with the companion national overview volume the
publication provides general Superfund background informa-
tion and descriptions of activities at each State National Pri-
orities List (NPL) site. The report clearly describes what the
problems are, what EPA and others participating in site
cleanups are doing, and how the nation can move ahead in
solving these serious problems. Also included are sites sum-
mary fact sheets on each State site being cleaned up under
the Superfund program.
Specifications: Available on Standing Order, deposit ac-
count required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada, and
Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. Also available as a package con-
taining 49 NPL Sites Volumes and 1 National Overview
Volume, PB92-963253. See also PB91-921253. 139p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Pollution
control, Washington(State), Superfund, National Priorities
List, Cleanup.
0287 National Priorities List Sites: Washington, 1992
Order Number PB93-963246CDH, price: PC A08/MF A02
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Dec 92
The publication provides general Superfund background in-
formation and descriptions of activities at each State Nation-
al Priorities List (NPL) site. It clearly describes what the prob-
lems are, what EPA and others participating in site cleanups
are doing, and how the nation can move ahead in solving
these serious problems. Compiles site summary fact sheets
on each State site being cleaned up under the Superfund
Program.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. Also available as a package con-
taining 49 NPL Sites, PB93-963250. 158p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Pollution
control, Washington(State), Superfund, National Priorities
List, Cleanup.
0288 National Priorities List Sites: West Virginia
Order Number PB91-921254CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 90
Together with the companion National Overview volume this
publication provides general Superfund background informa-
tion and descriptions of activities at each State National Pri-
orities List (NPL) site. The document is intended to clearly
describe what the problems are, what EPA and others par-
ticipating in site cleanups are doing, and how the Nation can
move ahead in solving these serious problems. The State
volume compiles site summary fact sheets on each State
site being cleaned up under the Superfund program.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada
49
-------
ADMINISTRATIVE & MANAGEMENT: Special Reports
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 39p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Pollution
control, West Virginia, Superfund, Cleanup.
0289 National Priorities List Sites: West Virginia
Order Number PB92-963229CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 91
Together with the companion national overview volume the
publication provides general Superfund background informa-
tion and descriptions of activities at each State National Pri-
orities List (NPL) site. The report clearly describes what the
problems are, what EPA and others participating in site
cleanups are doing, and how the nation can move ahead in
solving these serious problems. Also included are sites sum-
mary fact sheets on each State site being cleaned up under
the Superfund program.
Specifications: Available on Standing Order, deposit ac-
count required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada, and
Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. Also available as a package con-
taining 49 NPL Sites Volumes and 1 National Overview
Volume, PB92-963253. See also PB91-921254. 51 p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Pollution
control, West Virginia, Superfund, National Priorities List,
Cleanup.
0290 National Priorities List Sites: West Virginia, 1992
Order Number PB93-963247CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Dec 92
The publication provides general Superfund background in-
formation and descriptions of activities at each State Nation-
al Priorities List (NPL) site. It clearly describes what the prob-
lems are, what EPA and others participating in site cleanups
are doing, and how the nation can move ahead in solving
these serious problems. Compiles site summary fact sheets
on each State site being cleaned up under the Superfund
Program.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. Also available as a package con-
taining 49 NPL Sites, PB93-963250. 54p.
Subject Index keywords: Hazardous materials, Pollution
control, West Virginia, Superfund, National Priorities List,
Cleanup.
0291 National Priorities List Sites: Wisconsin
Order Number PB91-921255CDH, price: PC A06/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 90
Together with the companion National Overview volume this
publication provides general Superfund background informa-
tion and descriptions of activities at each State National Pri-
orities List (NPL) site. The document is intended to clearly
describe what the problems are, what EPA and others par-
ticipating in site cleanups are doing, and how the Nation can
move ahead in solving these serious problems. The State
volume compiles site summary fact sheets on each State
site being cleaned up under the Superfund program.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche, 117p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Pollution
control, Wisconsin, Superfund, Cleanup.
0292 National Priorities List Sites: Wisconsin
Order Number PB92-963243CDH, price: PC A06/MF A02
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 91
Together with the companion national overview volume the
publication provides general Superfund background informa-
tion and descriptions of activities at each State National Pri-
orities List (NPL) site. The report clearly describes what the
problems are, what EPA and others participating in site
cleanups are doing, and how the nation can move ahead in
solving these serious problems. Also included are sites sum-
mary fact sheets on each State site being cleaned up under
the Superfund program.
Specifications: Available on Standing Order, deposit ac-
count required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada, and
Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. Also available as a package con-
taining 49 NPL Sites Volumes and 1 National Overview
Volume, PB92-963253. See also PB91-921255. 122p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Pollution
control, Wisconsin, Superfund, National Priorities List, Clean-
up.
0293 National Priorities List Sites: Wisconsin, 1992
Order Number PB93-963248CDH, price: PC A07/MF A02
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Dec 92
The publication provides general Superfund background in-
formation and descriptions of activities at each State Nation-
al Priorities List (NPL) site. It clearly describes what the prob-
lems are, what EPA and others participating in site cleanups
are doing, and how the nation can move ahead in solving
these serious problems. Compiles site summary fact sheets
on each State site being cleaned up under the Superfund
Program.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. Also available as a package con-
taining 49 NPL Sites, PB93-963250. 127p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Pollution
control, Wisconsin, Superfund, National Priorities List, Clean-
up.
0294 National Priorities! List Sites: Wyoming
Order Number PB91-921256CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 90
Together with the companion National Overview volume this
publication provides general Superfund background informa-
tion and descriptions of activities at each State National Pri-
orities List (NPL) site. The document is intended to clearly
describe what the problems are, what EPA and others par-
ticipating in site cleanups are doing, and how the Nation can
move ahead in solving these serious problems. The State
volume compiles site summary fact sheets on each State
site being cleaned up under the Superfund program.
50
-------
ADMINISTRATIVE & MANAGEMENT: Specia(
Reports
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 35p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Pollution
control, Wyoming, Super-fund, Cleanup.
0295 National Priorities List Sites: Wyoming
Order Number PB92-963238CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 91
Together with the companion national overview volume the
publication provides general Superfund background informa-
tion and descriptions of activities at each State National Pri-
orities List (NPL) site. The report clearly describes what the
problems are, what EPA and others participating in site
cleanups are doing, and how the nation can move ahead in
solving these serious problems. Also included are sites sum-
mary fact sheets on each State site being cleaned up under
the Superfund program.
Specifications: Available on Standing Order, deposit ac-
count required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada and
Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. Also available as a package con-
taining 49 NPL Sites Volumes and 1 National Overview
Volume, PB92-963253. See also PB91-921256. 47p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Pollution
control, Wyoming, Superfund, National Priorities List, Clean-
0296 National Priorities List Sites: Wyoming, 1992
Order Number PB93-963249CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Dec 92
The publication provides general Superfund background in-
formation and descriptions of activities at each State Nation-
al Priorities List (NPL) site. It clearly describes what the prob-
lems are, what EPA and others participating in site cleanups
are doing, and how the nation can move ahead in solving
these serious problems. Compiles site summary fact sheets
on each State site being cleaned up under the Superfund
Program.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U S Canada
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. Also available as a package con-
taining 49 NPL Sites, PB93-963250. 41 p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Pollution
control, Wyoming, Superfund, National Priorities list Clean-
up. •(.-•
0297 National Priorities List Sites (1992)
Order Number PB93-963250CDH, price: PC$700.00
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 1992
Specifications: Package includes 49 NPL Sites PB93-
963201 through PB93-963249. 4835p-in 49v.
0298 National Superfund Program Priorities, Fiscal Year
1994
Order Number PB94-963221CDH, price: PC A01/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 31 Jan 94
The memorandum provides the FY 1994 National Superfund
Program Priorities for Regions and Headquarters. There are
nine major Superfund priorities: Accelerated Cleanup and
Emergency Response; Enforcement First; Enforcement Fair-
ness; Military Base Closure; NPL Construction Completions;
Contracts Management; Environmental Justice and Meaning-
ful Community Involvement; Enhancement of State Role and
Development of Deferral Options; and Innovative Technol-
ogies.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 3p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Hazardous materials,
Waste management.
0299 Progress Toward Implementing Superfund. Fiscal
Year 1988
Order Number PB90-249442CDH, price: PC A21/MF A03
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Apr 90
The EPA's Annual Report includes the progress made by the
Agency during Fiscal Year 1988 in implementin CERCLA (or
Superfund), as amended by the Superfund Amendments and
Reauthorization Act (SARA) of 1986. The report provides an
overall perspective on progress in 1988, and, in addition,
also contains information that Congress specifically request-
ed, including a detailed description of each of the 152
Records of Decision (RODs) that were signed in fiscal year
1988; a report on the status of remedial actions, including
enforcement activity, in progress at the end of the fiscal
year; and an evaluation of newly developed feasible and
achievable permanent treatment technologies.
Specifications: See also PB89-233548. 479p.
Subject index keywords: National government, Hazardous
materials, Waste disposal, Pollution control, Superfund.
0300 Progress Toward Implementing Superfund. Fiscal
Year 1989
Order Number PB91-921204CDH, price: PC A16/MF A02
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Dec 90
The EPA's Annual Report includes the progress made by the
Agency in implementing the national hazardous waste law
and its amendments (CERCLA and SARA). The reports pro-
vide an overall perspective on progress, contain information
that Congress specifically requested, and an evaluation of
newly developed feasible and achieveable permanent treat-
ment technologies.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $100 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $200). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. Supersedes PB91-921201 See
also PB90-249442. 369p.
Subject index keywords: National government, Hazardous
materials, Waste disposal, Pollution control, Superfund.
51
-------
ADMINISTRATIVE & MANAGEMENT: Special Reports
0301 Progress Toward Implementing Superfund, Fiscal
Year 1990: A Report to the Congress
Order Number PB92-963256CDH, price: PC E05/MF A04
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Feb 92
Section 301 (h) of the Comprehensive Environmental Re-
sponse, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA, or Super-
fund), as amended by the Superfund Amendments and Re-
authorization Act (SARA) of 1986, requires the Agency to
report annually on response activities and accomplishments,
and to compare remedial and enforcement projects with
those undertaken in previous fiscal years. The Environmental
Protection Agency (EPA), at the end of fiscal year 1990
(FY90), was well on its way toward intensifying the Super-
fund program. Its accomplishments indicate the Agency's ac-
celerated success in implementing the Superfund program.
The Agency aggressively seeks potentially responsible party
(PRP) involvement at every site where PRPs are identified.
The Report contains information Congress specifically re-
quested in Section 301(h)(1), including an abstract of each
Record of Decision (ROD) that was signed in FY90; a report
on the status of remedial actions, including enforcement ac-
tivity in progress at the end of the fiscal year; and an evalua-
tion of newly developed feasible and achievable treatment
technologies; and a description of minority firm participation
in Superfund contracts and efforts to encourage such partici-
pation.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 400p.
Subject Index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
Hazardous materials, Pollution regulations.
0302 Progress Toward Implementing Superfund, Fiscal
Year 1991. Report to Congress
Order Number PB94-963234CDH, price: PC A22/MF A04
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Feb 94
The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) continued its
progress in protecting public health, welfare, and the environ-
ment through the Superfund program in fiscal year 1991
(FY91). As it completed the eleventh year of the program,
the Agency reported clean-up work progress or completion
at 93 percent of the 1,207 sites on the National Priorities
List. The FY91 accomplishments reflect activities initiated by
the 30-Day Task Force and continued success in implement-
ing A Management Review of the Superfund Program (the
FY89 90-Day Study) (PB90-153883).
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 522p.
Subject Index keywords: Superfund, Hazardous materials,
Waste management.
0303 RCRA, Superfund Monthly Hot Line Reports
Order Number PB92-922400CDH, price: Subscription, call for
price
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste; 1992
The RCRA/SF Hotline quickly responds to questions related
to the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA), the
comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and
Liability Act (CERCLA), Underground Storage Tanks (UST)
program, the Superfund Amendments Reauthorization Act
(SARA) and the Chemical emergency Preparedness (CEPP)
Community Right-to-know Act/Title III program. The hotline is
the mechanism for EPA's response to inquiries from the
public and regulated community; the referral point for docu-
ment availability; the dissemination of changing information;
and the primary means for answering factual questions on
EPA regulations and policies. The Monthly Hotline Reports
contain questions posed by the callers that were either sig-
nificant and required the EPA to resolve the issues or were
the most frequently asked questions. Also included in the
Reports are the Federal Register summaries, publications
availabilities, and call statistics.
Specifications: Available on subscription, U.S., Canada, and
Mexico price $96.00; price for others $192.00. Also available
individually. Back year sets and indexes are available to
1982. 12 issues.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Government
policies, Law(Jurisprudence), Pollution abatement, Periodi-
cals, Superfund.
0304 SARA (Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization
Act) Section 313 Roadmaps Data Base. User's Manual.
Version 2.10
Order Number PB90-174855CDH, price: PC A05/MF A01
IGF Inc Fairfax, VA.; Environmental Protection Agency,
Washington, DC. Office of Toxic Substances; 14 Jul 89
EPA has developed a database of sources of information on
the chemicals listed in section 313 of the Superfund Amend-
ments and Reauthorization Act (SARA). The database is in-
tended to assist users of section 313 Toxic Release Invento-
ry data to perform exposure and risk assessments of these
chemicals. The Roadmaps system displays and/or prints in-
formation for the SARA section 313 chemicals on health and
environmental effects, Federal regulation, and state air and
water regulations, monitoring data, and state contacts.
Specifications: For system on diskettes, see PB90-501487.
See also PB90-501479. Sponsored by Environmental Protec-
tion Agency, Washington, DC. Office of Toxic Substances.
87p.
Subject index keywords: Exposure, Risk, Toxic substances.
0305 Smart Moves in Superfund - Regional Initiatives.
Volume 1, Number 1, February 1992
Order Number PB92-963272CDH, price: PC A01/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Feb 92
The bulletin serves as an exchange for Regional information
in Superfund. The issue has the following contents: region 6
to cut time between NF'L listing and design; region 4 encour-
ages PRPs to start remedial designs before consent decree;
region 3 eliminates statement of work; suggestion box; revi-
talization team meets on potential pilots; and voice of the re-
gions.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 4p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
Hazardous materials, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
Response.
52
-------
ADMINISTRATIVE & MANAGEMENT: Special
Reports
0306 Smart Moves in Superfund - Regional Pilots and
hiitiatives. Volume 1, Number 2, September 1992
Order Number PB93-963283CDH, price: PC A01/MF A01
o rl^?,"10"*3' Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
bolid Waste and Emergency Response; Sep 92
The issue of the Smart Moves in Superfund bulletin series
highlights regional pilots and initiatives to streamline cleanup
through the Superfund Accelerated Cleanup Model.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S Canada
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 4p.
Subject index keywords: Waste management, Superfund
Hazardous materials, Superfund Accelerated Cleanup Model!
0307 Smart Moves in Superfund - Revitalization One Year
Later. Volume 1, Number 3, January 1993
Order Number PB93-963284CDH, price: PC A01/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
bond Waste and Emergency Response; Jan 93
The issue of the Smart Moves in Superfund bulletin series
provides an update on the realization effort, highlighting
National Prionties List (NPL) construction completions, accel-
erating cleanup, the Superfund Accelerated Cleanup Model
risk assessment/risk management, contracts management'
enforcement policy/equity, interagency cooperation, public
forms, and state meetings.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S. Canada
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 4p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management
Hazardous materials, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
Response. *
0308 Some Major Factors important in Establishing Land
Use Policy for Remediated Superfund Sites
Order Number PB90-256686CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
Georgia Univ., Athens.; Environmental Protection Agency
Washington, DC. Office of Cooperative Environmental
Management; Dec 89
The report is part of the National Network for Environmental
Management Studies under the auspices of the Office of Co-
operative Environmental Management of the U.S Environ-
mental Protection Agency. No explicit federal policy address-
es future land use of remediated Superfund sites. The EPA
has no official land use policy for these sites and most states
have no mechanisms for identifying uncontrolled hazardous
waste sites, and no policies or procedures for guiding rede-
velopment of remediated sites. Historically, land use deci-
sions have been made by local governments. However local
governments are subject to political pressures which impact
land use decisions, and may override environmental and
health concerns. Thus, federal and state participation is vital
in devising land use controls. In the absence of formal policy
a variety of factors impact land use decisions. Four general
concerns are scientific uncertainty and technological limita-
tions, cleanup standards and risk assessment, institutional
controls, and liability for remediation costs. The report con-
c udes that the principal goal of land use policy should be to
allow the most effective allocation and utilization of available
resources to meet the legislative purpose of health and envi-
ronmental protection. Various possible land use policy objec-
tives are proposed. J
Specifications: Sponsored by Environmental Protection
Agency, Washington, DC. Office of Cooperative Environmen-
tal Management. 54p.
Subject index keywords: Land use, Hazardous materials,
Waste disposal, Law(Jurisprudence), Superfund, Remedial
action.
0309 Status of Regional Superfund Pilots: End-of-Year
Report
Order Number PB94-963216CDH, price: PC A07/MF A02
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Dec 93
In 1991 and 1992, the Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
Response (OSWER) began major efforts to streamline and
accelerate Superfund response activities. In a statement on
October 2, 1991, the USEPA Administrator approved the Su-
perfund 30-Day Task Force Implementation Plan (October 1,
1991) which identified aggressive cleanup targets and strate-
gies for streamlining and 'revitalizing' the Superfund process
Following this Introduction, Part II of the report contains an
index of pilot activities and key contacts; Part III provides ab-
stracts on each pilot; and Part IV describes in detail the
goals of each pilot, its status, evaluation plan, and results to
date.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 133p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management
Hazardous materials.
0310 Superfund Administrative Improvements. Executive
Summary
Order Number PB93-963294CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 23 Jun 93
The report focuses on administrative improvements to the
Superfund program suggested by the Superfund Administra-
tive Improvements Task Force. Specific topics include en-
hancing enforcement fairness and reducing transaction
costs; enhancing cleanup effectiveness and consistency; en-
hancing meaningful public involvement; and enhancing the
state role in the Superfund program.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $225 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $450). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. See also PB93-963295. 19p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Hazardous materials,
Waste disposal.
0311 Superfund Administrative Improvements. Final
Report
Order Number PB93-963295CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 23 Jun 93
The report focuses on administrative improvements to the
Superfund program suggested by the Superfund Administra-
tive Improvements Task Force. Specific topics include en-
hancing enforcement fairness and reducing transaction
costs; enhancing cleanup effectiveness and consistency; en-
hancing meaningful public involvement; and enhancing the
state role in the Superfund program.
53
-------
ADMINISTRATIVE & MANAGEMENT: Special Reports
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $225 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $450). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. See also PB93-963294. 54p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste disposal, Haz-
ardous materials.
0312 Superfund Administrative Improvements:
Reinventing Superfund
Order Number PB94-963210CDH, price: PC A01/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Nov 93
The Superfund Administrative Improvements initiatives are a
comprehensive package of administrative changes designed
to make significant improvements to the Superfund program
prior to Superfund reauthorization. Announced in June 1993,
these initiatives have had an immediate impact on improving
the pace, cost and fairness of Superfund. The fact sheet de-
scribes the themes, background and each initiative of the
Administrative Improvements effort. The fact sheet also de-
scribes major activities which have been completed during
the first three months of implementation, as well as those
that are currently underway and planned to be completed
over the next 12 months.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 4p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Pollution regulations,
Administrative procedures.
0313 Superfund Emergency Response Actions: A
Summary of Federally-Funded Removals. Fifth Annual
Report - Fiscal Year 1990
Order Number PB92-963403CDH, price: PC A08/MF A02
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Oct 91
The Superfund removal program has achieved significant ac-
complishments in responding to environmental emergencies,
cleaning up hazardous waste sites, and making sites safe.
For this reason, EPA publishes the Superfund Emergency
Response Actions summary, which provides the public with
valuable information about Superfund removal actions under-
taken by EPA. This document is updated annually. The Fifth
Annual Report, which is the fourth update to the initial docu-
ment, summarizes the Superfund removal actions completed
by EPA between October 1989 and September 1990.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. See also PB90-921260. 159p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Hazardous materials,
Emergency planning, Remedial action, Waste management,
Emergency Response Program, Remedial response.
0314 Superfund Emergency Response Actions: A
Summary of Federally Funded Removals. Fourth Annual
Report - Fiscal Year 1989
Order Number PB91-921260CDH, price: PC A07/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 90
Summarizes short-term actions (removals) undertaken by
EPA and the U.S. Coast Guard in response to hazardous
substance incidents. The documents present an historical
perspective of the program and summarize removal actions
taken.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 130p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Emergency planning,
Hazardous materials, Waste management, Remedial re-
sponse.
0315 Superfund Emergency Response Actions: A
Summary of Federally-Funded Removals. Sixth Annual
Report, Fiscal Year 1991
Order Number PB92-963421CDH, price: PC A09/MF A02
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Oct 92
The Superfund removal program has achieved significant ac-
complishments in responding to environmental emergencies,
cleaning up hazardous waste sites, and making sites safe.
For this reason, EPA publishes the Superfund Emergency
Response Actions summary, which provides the public with
valuable information about Superfund removal actions under-
taken by EPA. This document is updated annually. The Sixth
Annual Report, which is the fifth update to the initial docu-
ment, summarizes the Superfund removal actions completed
by EPA between October 1990 and September 1991.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. See also PB92-963403. 192p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Emergency planning,
Public information, Hazardous materials, Waste management,
Remedial action.
0316 Superfund Emergency Response Actions: A
Summary of Federally-Funded Removals. Volume 1
Order Number PB90-197310CDH, price: PC A10/MF A02
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; May 87
The document is a summary of short-term actions (removals)
undertaken by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and
the U S Coast Guard in response to hazardous substance
incidents. The document presents a historical perspective of
the program, summarizing short-term actions completed
during the five-year authorized funding period of the Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act (CERCLA), December 11, 1980, through September
30 1985 and those actions taken during October 1, 1985
through September 30, 1986 that were funded primarily by
two special appropriations from Congress. The Superfund
Emergency Response Actions summary is the first document
to be published aggregating short-term response information
for all six years. As the Superfund removal program contin-
ues, EPA intends to publish annual updates of the document.
Specifications: See also Volume 2, PB90-197328. 196p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste dis-
posal, History, Removal, Superfund program, Remedial ac-
tions.
54
-------
ADMINISTRATIVE & MANAGEMENT: Special
Reports
0317 Superfund Emergency Response Actions: A
Summary of Federally-Funded Removals. Volume 2
Order Number PB90-197328CDH, price: PC A06/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Jun 88
Serves as the second annual report for public use on short-
rQ?« reTya aCt'°ns undertaken by EPA between October
i a«6 and June 1988.
Specifications: See also Volume 1, PB90-197310. 11 Op.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste dis-
posal, History, Removal, Superfund program, Remedial ac-
0318 Superfund Emergency Response Actions- A
Summary of Federally Funded Removals. Volume 3
Order Number PB90-214354CDH, price: PC A06/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
faolid Waste and Emergency Response; Jun 89
Volume III summarizes short-term removal activities complet-
ed during the eighth year of the Superfund program The
document is presented as a series of matrices that are orga-
nized numerically by Region and alphabetically by State and
fn nrmT with!n,fach Re9ion- " contains the same types of
nformation included in Volume I and II. EPA intends to con-
tinue providing the information in future updates. Inquiries re-
garding information contained in the document should be re-
ferred to the appropriate EPA Regional office. A list of EPA
Snnaand **"?? delineatin9 the States within each
Region are provided in the report. In addition, the document
includes a listing of sites found in Volumes I and II These
sites are listed alphabetically by State within their respective
Regions. In the back of the report, there is also an alphabeti-
cal index of all sites in Volumes I, II, and III.
Specifications: See also PB90-197310. 125p.
S*]ew, "J016,* keywords: Hazardous materials, Site sur-
veys, Waste disposal, Superfund program, Remedial action,
Emergency plans, Cleanup operations, Land pollution con-
trol, Waste management.
0319 Superfund: EPA/ICMA Superfund Revitalization
Conference. Held in Chicago, Illinois on November 12-13,
Order Number PB93-963274CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Apr 93
The summary report outlines the comments made by the in-
troductory speakers as well as the conclusions drawn from
the group discussions. The report highlights those recom-
mendations that were strongly endorsed by a large number
ri fffo t The ?POrt also identifies P°ints on which the
different groups could not reach consensus.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U S Canada
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 52p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Hazardous materials
Waste management, Meetings.
0320 Superfund: EPA/ICMA Superfund Revitalization
Conference. Held in San Francisco, California on
February 1-2, 1993
Order Number PB94-963202CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
bolid Waste and Emergency Response; Oct 93
The report summarizes comments from the regional confer-
ence held in San Francisco in February 1993 on improvinq
the Superfund program.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U S Canada
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 52p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Hazardous materials
Waste management, Meetings.
0321 SUPERFUND: Focusing on the Nation at Large. A
Decade of Progress at National Priorities List Sites
Order Number PB91-921202CDH, price: Standing Order, call
for price
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
• Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Sep 90
The National volume of the public document series provides
a progress report on the cleanup of Superfund sites, site-by-
site. The document explains the progress and the challenges
facing the nations. The publication describes sites that are
deemed to be of national priority and provides information on
their cleanup progress. In addition to this volume, there will
be state-specific volumes available during early 1991.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $100 U.S Canada
and Mexico; all others $200). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 102p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste dis-
posal, Pollution control, Superfund, Cleanup.
0322 Superfund: Focusing on the Nation at Large. A
Decade of Progress at National Priorities List Sites
Order Number PB91-921207CDH, price: PC A06/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 90
The publication summarizes the progress made in hazardous
site clean-up of sites on the National Priorities List (NPL) It
also provides a state-by-state summary of 422 improved
sites. 'Superfund: Focusing on the Nation at Large' is supple-
mented by individual State books which contain detailed in-
formation on all 1,236 NPL sites.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U S Canada
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. Supersedes PB91-921202 See
also PB91-921209 through PB91-921258. 103p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Hazardous materials
Remedial action, Pollution control, National Priorities List
Cleanup.
0323 Superfund: Focusing on the Nation at Large. 1991
Update
Order Number PB92-963252CDH, price: PC A05/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 91
The report summarizes the progress made in the cleanup of
sites on the National Priorities List (NPL). It also provides a
55
-------
ADMINISTRATIVE & MANAGEMENT: Special Reports
stale-by-state summary of 422 improved sites. Supplemented
by the individual State books which contain detailed informa-
tion on all 1245 sites.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. See also PB92-963253 and PB91-
921207. 88p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Pollution
contra), Superfund, National Priorities List.
0324 Superfund Policy Forum Update, Volume 1, Number
1. February 1992
Order Number PB92-963262CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Feb 92
The purpose of the bulletin is to keep all Superfund staff
members knowledgeable and informed about reauthonzation
issues and events through periodic newsletter updates.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 6p.
Subject index keywords: Government policies, Hazardous
materials, Project management, Meetings, Superfund, Com-
prehensive Environmental Response Compensation and Li-
abilities Act(CERCLA), Reauthorization issues.
0325 Superfund Progress - Aficionado's Version:
Progress as of June 30,1992 „,.,,-.„.,
Order Number PB92-963278CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; 30 Jun 92
The quarterly Superfund Progress reports on the strides the
Superfund program is making towards protecting people and
the environment from the hazards of uncontrolled chemical
releases. The Aficionado's Version of Superfund Progress
provides more detailed statistical information. The Summer
1992 Superfund Progress highlights the Environmental Re-
sponse Team, the Superfund Accelerated Cleanup Model,
and the Superfund Progress Report - making polluters pay
for cleanup.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. See also PB92-963279 and PB92-
963265. 16p.
Subject index keywords: Protection, Hazardous materials.
0326 Superfund Progress - Aficionado's Version
(Progress as of March 31, 1992)
Order Number PB92-963267CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Jun 92
Superfund is the United States program for cleaning up un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. Established by the Com-
prehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Li-
ability Act (CERCLA) of 1980, EPA records in its CERCLIS
database every hazardous waste site considered for a Su-
perfund cleanup and every site where a removal action is
performed. The system tracks the identification, evaluation,
and if necessary, cleanup of hazardous waste sites. The Re-
medial Project managers in each EPA Region, who oversee
cleanup efforts, add information about the sites they manage
to CERCLIS. Currently, there are 35,984 sites in CERCLIS.
The Superfund Site Tally includes the current status of each
CERCLIS site.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 14p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste dis-
posal, Pollution control, Project management, Superfund,
Comprehensive Environmental Response.
0327 Superfund Progress. Aficionado's Version. Progress
as of September 30, 1892
Order Number PB93-963255CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Jan 93
The issue of Superfund Progress Aficionado's Version pro-
vides facts and figures as of September 30, 1992, for NPL
site distribution, emergency removals, preliminary assess-
ments/site inspections/the NPL, remedial investigations/fea-
sibility studies/RODs, remedial action, and enforcement.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 15p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
Hazardous materials, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
Response.
0328 Superfund Progress: Fall/Winter 1992
Order Number PB93-963254CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Jan 93
The issue of Superfund Progress provides information on Su-
perfund training programs, promoting local involvement in
Superfund, and a Superfund 1992 progress report.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 17p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Training devices,
Waste management, Hazardous materials, Personnel devel-
opment.
0329 Superfund Progress, Spring 1992
Order Number PB92-963265CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; May 92
The report describes the Superfund removal program. The
duties of the on-scene coordinators who work at Emergency
spills are described. Case studies at different sites are in-
cluded and the progress made.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 12p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Pollution
control, Project management, Superfund.
56
-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Assessment i
Listing
0330 Superfund Progress, Summer 1992
Order Number PB92-963279CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 92
The quarterly Superfund Progress report reports on the
strides the Superfund program is making towards protecting
people and the environment from the hazards of uncon-
troled chemical releases. It portrays facets of the program
that often go unnoticed or unpublicized, reports new devel-
opments, and provides figures to show what the program has
accomplished. The Summer 1992 Superfund Progress in-
XSLnrf^"8 f" !h^ Environmental Response Team, the
Superfund Accelerated Cleanup Model, and the Superfund
Progress Report - Making Polluters Pay for Cleanup.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 15p.
Subject index keywords: Protection, Hazardous materials,
ouperfund.
°3u1 Juperfund Reauthorization: NACEPT Subcommittee
Handbook
Order Number PB93-963298CDH, price: PC A05/MF A02
inr^,mental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
bond Waste and Emergency Response; 18 Jun 93
The handbook for the NACEPT Subcommittee on Superfund
reauthonzation includes overview of Superfund regulatory
framework, program status, background materials from meet-
ings prior to June 1993, and a selection of critical analyses
or buperfund.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 100p.
Handbook"?6* keywords: SuPerfund, Pollution regulations,
0332 Superfund Reform Act of 1994
Order Number PB94-963239CDH, price: PC A10/MF A03
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Feb 94
The legislation which would amend the Comprehensive Envi-
iQfine^Do,eAP0nSe'JCompensation' and Liability Act of
1980 (CERCLA), was developed through a lengthy process
*£ °ap'tallzed on the expertise of the many Superfund
stakeholders - both inside and outside of government
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S. Canada
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 222p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
i—Gcjislcition.
0333 Superfund: Report of the EPA Superfund
Revitalization Public Meeting Held on June 24, 1992
Volumes 1 and 2
Order Number PB92-963288CDH, price: PC A06/MF A02
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 92
On June 24, 1992, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
and its Superfund Revitalization Office helda meeting to en-
courage public participation in identifying innovative, non-tra-
ditional approaches to expedite the Superfund cleanup proc-
ess. The agenda was structured to focus on four particular
topic areas: ways to speed up the Superfund cleanup pro-
gram; ways to encourage and manage voluntary cleanups by
potentially responsible parties; effective ways to involve the
state, the community, and other interested parties in the
entire Superfund cleanup process; and ways to realistically
describe the expectations of the Superfund program, meas-
ure its success in achieving the program's goals, and com-
municate these goals and successes to interested parties.
The report, organized along the lines of the topics outlined
above, documents suggestions that were made by attendees
at the meeting, as well as written comments that were pre-
pared specifically to address the issues discussed at the
meeting. The report also provides a summary of EPA follow-
up actions currently under consideration.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 102p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Meetings, Citizen par-
ticipation, Remedial action, Waste management, Cleanup op-
erations.
0334 Superfund Revitalization: Measures of Success
Order Number PB94-963217CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; 7 Jan 94
Table of Contents: Introduction; Valuing Superfund Cleanup-
Accelerating Superfund Response; Communication Initiatives;
and Contract Management.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 72p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management
Hazardous materials.
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION:
Assessment & Listing
0335 Amendment to Historical Definitions of NPL
Deletion Start and Completion Dates
Order Number PB93-963278CDH, price: PC A01/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 8 Oct 92
The memorandum amends two historical CERCLIS (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response Compensation and Liability
Information System) definitions of the NPL (National Priorities
List) deletion process start and completion dates in the Su-
perfund Comprehensive Accomplishments Plan (SCAP)
Manual of FY 1987 and the Superfund Program Management
Manual of FY 1988.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 2p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
Hazardous materials, Superfund Comprehensive Accomplish-
ments Plan, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Re-
sponse.
57
-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Assessment & Listing
0336 Clarification of Delegation to Approve Consistency
Exemptions at NPL Sites
Order Number PB93-963281CDH, price: PC A01/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 3 Jun 92
The directive clarifies Regional authority to approve exemp-
tions from the $2 million statutory limit on Superfund removal
actions.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper or microfiche. 2p.
Subject Index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
Hazardous materials, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
Response.
0337 Closing the NPL Book under the Original MRS
Order Number PB91-921302CDH, price: PC A01/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Nov 90
The Fact Sheet discusses the closing of the Old NPL under
the original HRS. Since 1982, the U.S. Environmental Protec-
tion Agency (EPA) has been preparing the National Priorities
List (NPL). The list informs the public of uncontrolled hazard-
ous waste sites that warrant further investigation to deter-
mine if they pose risks to public health or the environment.
Such sites are eligible for long-term 'remedial action' fi-
nanced under the Trust Fund established by the Comprehen-
sive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability
Act as amended by the Superfund Amendments and Reau-
thorization Act of 1986 (SARA). Sites are placed on the NPL
primarily on the basis of their scores under EPA's Hazard
Ranking System (HRS) model developed in 1982. EPA has
now revised the HRS in response to SARA. The revised
HRS, which will become effective late in February 1991, 90
days after its publication in the Federal Register, is a more
comprehensive and accurate scoring system than the origi-
nal HRS and will add new types of sites to the NPL.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $150 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $300). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 5p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
Hazardous materials, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
Response, National Priorities List, Hazard Ranking System.
0338 Compendium of NPL Listing Policies and
Procedures, 1982 to 1985
Order Number PB91-921281CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Aug 91
The compendium is a collection of NPL listing policy and pro-
cedure directives issued from 1982 to 1985. The contents in-
clude: Guidance for Establishing the National Priorities List,
February 1982 (9320.1-01); Guidance for Establishing the
National Priorities List, June 1982 (9320.1-02); Guidance for
Proposed NPL Update No. 3, February 1984 (9320.3-04);
Guidance for Updating the National Priorities List, May 1983
(9320.3-01); Instructions for Promulgating the National Prior-
ities List Update, January 1984 (9320.3-02); National Prior-
ities List Categorization, July 1984 (9320.1-04); NPL Informa-
tion Update - Update No. 4, April 1985 (9320.3-05); Proce-
dures for Updating the National Priorities List, May 1984,
(9320.3-03); Promulgation of the National Priorities List, May
1983 (9320.1-03); RCRA/NPL Listing Policy, September
1986 (9320.1-05); and Updating the National Priorities List:
Update No. 6 Proposal, September 1985 (9320.3-06).
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 74p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste dis-
posal, Superfund.
0339 Discussions with the Public Concerning NPL
Listings
Order Number PB93-963338CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 30 Apr 93
The memorandum briefly outlines EPA's policy on site-relat-
ed discussions prior to and during rulemaking concerning the
listing of sites on the National Priorities List. Recently some
Regions, as well as several members of Congress, have
raised the question of what types of site-related discussions
are permissible between EPA personnel and the public (e.g.,
potentially responsible parties (PRPs) or commenters) prior
to and during the listing process.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 20p.
Subject index keywords: Waste management, Government
policies, Hazardous materials, Directives, National Priorities
List, Potentially responsible parties(PRPs).
0340 FACT BOOK: National Priorities List under the
Original Hazard Ranking System, 1981-1991
Order Number PB93-963350CDH, price: PC A05/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Oct 93
The report provides an overview of the NPL listing process
and historical data summaries on the NPL from 1981-1991.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 78p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Listings, National Pri-
orities List.
0341 Guidance for Environmental Priorities Initiative (EPI)
Facilities in the Superfund Pre-Remedial Program
Order Number PB91-139980CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; 31 Jan 89
The directive provides guidance to the Regions and States
on handling Environmental Priorities Initiative facilities by the
Superfund pre-remedial program. The directive supplements
directive no. 9932.0 'Method for Prioritizing CERCLA Prelimi-
nary Assessments at RCRA Facilities,' dated May 31, 1988.
Specifications: See also PB91-139972. 10p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
Hazardous materials, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
Response, Resource Conservation and Recovery Act, Envi-
ronmental priorities initiatives.
58
-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Assessment &
Listing
°3unde?CERCCLAf0r Perf°rming Preli™nary Assessments
Order Number PB92-963303CDH, price: PC A13/MF A03
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 91
The purpose of the guidance is to provide instructions for
conducting a PA and reporting results. The guidance dis-
cusses the information required to evaluate a site and how to
obtain it, how to score a site, and reporting requirements
f he document also provides guidelines and instruction on PA
evaluation, scoring, and the use of standard PA scoresheets
The overall goal of the guidance is to assist PA investigators
in conducting high-quality assessments that result in correct
site screening or further action recommendations on a na-
tionally consistent basis.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S. Canada
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. Supersedes PB90-183054. 277p
Subject index keywords: Assessments, Hazardous materi-
als, Sites, Superfund.
03£| ®"idance for Performing Site Inspections under
Order Number PB92-963375CDH, price: PC A11/MF A03
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 92
The guidance presents EPA's site inspection strategy The
strategy discusses procedural guidelines to investigate po-
tential Superfund (CERCLA) sites for evaluation pursuant to
•l^fzaod Rankin9 System (HRS), revised in accordance
^oL -?u 5?!tund Amendments and Reauthorization Act of
nasb. The HRS is the primary means by which EPA evalu-
ates sites for Superfund's National Priorities List (NPL).
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U S Canada
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 244p,
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Inspection, Site sur-
veys, Waste management, Hazardous materials.
0344 Guidance on Setting Priorities for NPL Candidate
Sites
Order Number PB93-963333CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
onr!Jr(?!?,mental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
bond Waste and Emergency Response; 28 Oct 92
The guidance document identifies factors that will help EPA
regions decide the order in which they should consider sites
with completed site inspections for inclusion on the NPL (Na-
tional Priorities List).
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 7p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Inspection, Site sur-
veys, National Priorities List.
0345 Guide to Management of Investigation-Derived
Wastes
Order Number PB92-963353CDH, price- PC A02
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Apr 92
The fact sheet presents an overview of possible investiga-
tion-derived waste management options, discusses the pro-
tectiveness requirements and ARARs associated with these
options, and outlines general objectives established for IDW
management under Superfund.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 8p.
Subject index keywords: Waste management, Pollution
regulations, Inspection, Superfund, Office of Solid Waste and
Emergency Response.
0346 Hazard Ranking System Guidance Manual
Order Number PB92-963377CDH, price: PC A22/MF A04
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Nov 92
The Hazard Ranking System Guidance Manual provides gen-
eral and technical guidance for individuals involved in deter-
mining Hazard Ranking System (HRS) scores and preparing
HRS scoring packages. The manual clarifies terms and con-
cepts in the HRS, presents strategies and specific guidance
for scoring selected HRS factors, and provides guidelines to
assist in collecting and organizing relevant data.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 524p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Hazardous materials,
Waste management, Manuals, Hazard Ranking System,
Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response.
0347 Hazard Ranking System Guidance Manual
Order Number PB93-963356CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Sep 93
The Hazard Ranking System (HRS) is the scoring method
EPA uses to assess the relative threat associated with the
release or potential release of hazardous substances from a
waste site. The HRS is the primary mechanism used by EPA
to determine which sites should be placed on the National
Priorities List. The manual is targeted primarily to HRS scor-
ers and HRS package preparers, who frequently are govern-
ment contractors or State agency staff. Inexperienced scor-
ers should find it especially helpful as a reference while they
'learn' the HRS. Others involved in EPA's site assessment
process (e.g., HRS package reviewers) should also find parts
of the manual useful.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. See also PB92-963377. 6p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Manuals, Hazard
Ranking System.
0348 Identification of a Senior Superfund Official for
Addressing Special NPL Site-Related Issues
Order Number PB93-963279CDH, price: PC A01/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 22 May 92
The directive identifies a senior Superfund official responsible
for reviewing and addressing specific issues at NPL (National
Priorities List) sites that cannot be resolved at the Regional
level and identifies criteria for NPL site referrals to this offi-
cial.
59
-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Assessment & Listing
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 3p.
Subject Index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
Hazardous materials, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
Response.
0349 Management of Investigation-Derived Wastes during
Site Inspections
Order Number PB91-921331CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; May 91
The guidance presents a general regulatory background and
options for management of investigation-derived wastes
(IDW) generated during Superfund site inspections (Sis).
These wastes include soil cuttings, drilling muds, purged
ground water decontamination fluids (water and other fluids),
disposable sampling equipment (DE), and disposable person-
al protective equipment (PPE). The National Contingency
Plan (NCP) requires that management of IDW generated
during Sis compiles with all applicable or relevant and appro-
priate requirements (ARARS) to the extent practicable. In ad-
dition, other legal and practical consideration may affect the
handling of IDW. Therefore, site inspection managers and
other involved parties should be familiar with this guidance,
as well as the requirements of the NCP, ARARs, and EPA's
interpretation of these requirements.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $150 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $300). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 70p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
Pollution regulations, Inspection, Site surveys, Office of Solid
Waste and Emergency Response.
0350 Mining Sites on the National Priorities List: NPL Site
Summary Reports. Volume 1 (Aluminum Company of
America (Vancouver Smelter) to Cleveland Mill)
Order Number PB92-124767CDH, price: PC$98.00
Science Applications International Corp., Falls Church, VA.;
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste; 21 Jun 91
Volume I of the Mining Sites on the National Priorities List
contains the following NPL Site Summary Reports: Aluminum
Company of America (Vouncouver Smelter), Anaconda
Smelter, Atlas Asbestos Mine, Bunker Hill Mining and Metal-
lurgical Complex, California Gulch, Carson River, Celtor
Chemical Works, Cherokee County/Galena Subsite, Cimar-
ron Mining Corp., Clear Creek/Central City, and Cleveland
Mill.
Specifications: Also available in set of 5 reports PC E99,
PB92-124759. See also Volume 2, PB92-124775. Portions of
this document are not fully legible. Sponsored by Environ-
mental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of Solid
Waste. 955p.
Subject index keywords: Mine wastes, Waste manage-
ment, Tailings, National Priorities List.
0351 Mining Sites on the National Priorities List: NPL Site
Summary Reports. Volume 2 (Commencement Bay
Nearshore/Tideflats to Kerr McGee) (Kress Creek, Reed-
Keppler Park, Residential Areas, Sewage Treatment
Plant)
Order Number PB92-124775CDH, price: PC$91.00
Science Applications International Corp., Falls Church, VA.;
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste; 21 Jun 91
Volume II of the Mining Sites on the National Priorities List
contains the following NPL Site Summary Reports: Com-
mencement Bay Nearshore/Tideflats, Denver Radium, Eagle
Mine East Helena Smelter, Eastern Michaud Flats Contami-
nation Area, Glen Ridge/Montclair/West Orange/US
Radium, Homestake Mill, Iron Mountain Mine, Johns-Manville
Coalinga Asbestos Mill, Kerr-McGee (Kress Creek, Reed-
Keppler Park, Residential Areas, Sewage Treatment Plant).
Specifications: Also available in set of 5 reports PC E99,
PB92-124759. See also Volume 1, PB92-124767 and Volume
3, PB92-124783. Portions of this document are not fully legi-
ble. Sponsored by Environmental Protection Agency, Wash-
ington, DC. Office of Solid Waste. 850p.
Subject index keywords: Mine wastes, Waste manage-
ment, Tailings, National Priorities List.
0352 Mining Sites on th« National Priorities List: NPL Site
Summary Reports. Volume 3 (Kerr-McGee Chemical
Corp. (Soda Springs Plant) to Ormet Corp)
Order Number PB92-124783CDH, price: PC$98.00
Science Applications International Corp., Falls Church, VA.;
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste; 21 Jun 91
Volume III of the Mining Sites on the National Priorities List
contains the following NPL Site Summary Reports: Kerr-
McGee Chemical Corp. (Soda Springs Plant), Lincoln Park,
Martin Marietta Reduction Facility, Midvale Slag (Valley Mate-
rials Slag), Milltown Reservoir Sediments, Monsanto Chemi-
cal Company, Monticello Mill Site, Monticello Vicinity Proper-
ties, Mouat Industries, and Ormet Corporation.
Specifications: Also available in set of 5 reports PC E99,
PB92-124759. See also Volume 2, PB92-124775 and Volume
4, PB92-124791. Portions of this document are not fully legi-
ble. Sponsored by Environmental Protection Agency, Wash-
ington, DC. Office of Solid Waste. 907p.
Subject index keywoirds: Mine wastes, Waste manage-
ment, Tailings, National Priorities List.
0353 Mining Sites on the National Priorities List: NPL Site
Summary Reports. Volume 4 (Oronogo-Duenweg Mining
Belt to Tar Creek)
Order Number PB92-124791CDH, price: PC$91.00
Science Applications International Corp., Falls Church, VA.;
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste; 21 Jun 91
Volume IV of the Mining Sites on the National Priorities List
contains the following NPL Site Summary Reports: Oronogo-
Deunweg Mining Belt, Palmerton Zinc, Sharon Steel/Midvale
Tailings, Silver Bow Creek/Butte Area Site, Silver Mountain
Mine, Smuggler Mountain, St. Louis Airport/Hazelwood Inter-
im/Futura Coatings, Sulphur Bank Mercury Mine, and Tar
Creek.
Specifications: Also available in set of 5 reports PC E99,
PB92-124759. See also Volume 3, PB92-124783 and Volume
60
-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Assessment A
Listing
5, PB92-124809. Portions of this document are not fully legi-
ble. Sponsored by Environmental Protection Agency Wash-
ington, DC. Office of Solid Waste. 874p.
Subject index keywords: Mine wastes, Waste manage-
ment, Tailings, National Priorities List.
0354 Mining Sites on the National Priorities List: NPL Site
Summary Reports. Volume 5 (Teledyne Wah Chang to
Wayne Interim Storage Facility/W.R. Grace)
Order Number PB92-124809CDH, price: PC$77.00
Science Applications International Corp., Falls Church, VA •
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste; 21 Jun 91
Volume V of the Mining Sites on the National Priorities List
contains the following NPL site summary reports: Teledyne
Wah Chang, Tex-Tin Corp., Torch Lake, United Nuclear Cor-
poration/Churchrock Site, U.S. Tatanium, Uravan Uranium
Mill, Whitewood Creek, and Wayne Interim Storage Facility/
W. R. Grace.
Specifications: Also available in set of 5 reports PC E99
PB92-124759. See also Volume 4, PB92-124791. Portions of
this document are not fully legible. Sponsored by Environ-
mental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of Solid
Waste. 615p.
Subject index keywords: Mine wastes, Waste manage-
ment, Tailings, National Priorities List.
0355 NPL Characterization Project: National Results
Order Number PB92-963304CDH, price: PC A07/MF A02
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Nov 91
The report is one in a series providing information on the
nature of the sites being evaluated by the Superfund site as-
sessment program. It is intended to provide a 'snapshot' of
national sites on the NPL as of February 1991. Separate re-
ports are available for the ten individual EPA Regions.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order de-
posit account required (Minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 138p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Pollution
control, United States, Superfund, National Priorities List US
EPA Region 1-10.
0356 NPL Characterization Project: Region 1 Results
Order Number PB92-963305CDH, price: PC A05/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Nov 91
The report is one in a series providing information on the
nature of the sites being evaluated by the Superfund site as-
sessment program. It is intended to provide a 'snapshot' of
sites in Region 1 on the NPL as of February 1991. Separate
reports are available for the other nine EPA Regions and for
the nation as a whole.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S. Canada
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 96p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Pollution
control, Superfund, National Priorities List, US EPA Region 1.
0357 NPL Characterization Project: Region 3 Results
Order Number PB92-963307CDH, price: PC A05/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Nov 91
The report is one in a series providing information on the
nature of the sites being evaluated by the Superfund site as-
sessment program. It is intended to provide a 'snapshot' of
sites in Region 3 on the NPL as of February 1991. Separate
reports are available for the other nine EPA Regions and for
the nation as a whole.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 96p.
Subject! index keywords: Hazardous materials, Pollution
control, Superfund, National Priorities List, US EPA Region 3.
0358 NPL Characterization Project: Region 4 Results
Order Number PB92-963308CDH, price: PC A05/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Nov 91
The report is one in a series providing information on the
nature of the sites being evaluated by the Superfund site as-
sessment program. It is intended to provide a 'snapshot' of
sites in Region 4 on the NPL as of February 1991. Separate
reports are available for the other nine EPA regions and for
the nation as a whole.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 96p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Pollution
control, Superfund, National Priorities List, US EPA Region 4.
0359 NPL Characterization Project: Region 5 Results
Order Number PB92-963309CDH, price: PC A05/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Nov 91
The report is one in a series providing information on the
nature of the sites being evaluated by the Superfund site as-
sessment program. It is intended to provide a 'snapshot' of
sites in Region 5 on the NPL as of February 1991. Separate
reports are available for the other nine EPA regions and for
the nation as a whole.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 96p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Pollution
control, Superfund, National Priorities List, US EPA Region 5.
0360 NPL, Characterization Project: Region 6 Results
Order Number PB92-963310CDH, price: PC A05/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Nov 91
The report is one in a series providing information on the
nature of the sites being evaluated by the Superfund site as-
sessment program. It is intended to provide a 'snapshot' of
sites in Region 6 on the NPL as of February 1991. Separate
reports are available for the other nine EPA regions and for
the nation as a whole.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
61
-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Assessment & Listing
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 96p.
Subject Index keywords: Hazardous materials, Pollution
control, Superfund, National Priorities List, US EPA Region 6.
0361 NPL Characterization Project: Region 7 Results
Order Number PB92-963311CDH, price: PC A05/MF Ap1
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Nov 91
The report is one in a series providing information on the
nature of the sites being evaluated by the Superfund site as-
sessment program. It is intended to provide a 'snapshot' of
sites in Region 7 on the NPL as of February 1991. Separate
reports are available for the other nine EPA regions and for
the nation as a whole.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 92p.
Subject Index keywords: Hazardous materials, Pollution
control, Superfund, National Priorities List, US EPA Region 7.
0362 NPL Characterization Project: Region 8 Results
Order Number PB92-963312CDH, price: PC A05/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Nov 91
The report is one in a series providing information on the
nature of the sites being evaluated by the Superfund site as-
sessment program. It is intended to provide a 'snapshot' of
sites in Region 8 on the NPL as of February 1991. Separate
reports are available for the other nine EPA Regions and for
the nation as a whole.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 92p.
Subject Index keywords: Hazardous materials, Pollution
control, Superfund, National Priorities List, US EPA Region.
0363 NPL Characterization Project: Region 9 Results
Order Number PB92-963313CDH, price: PC A05/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Nov 91
The report is one in a series providing information on the
nature of the sites being evaluated by the Superfund site as-
sessment program. It is intended to provide a 'snapshot' of
sites In Region 9 on the NPL as of February 1991. Separate
reports are available for the other nine EPA Regions and for
the nation as a whole.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 96p.
Subject Index keywords: Hazardous materials, Pollution
control, Superfund, National Priorities List, US EPA Region 9.
0364 NPL Characterization Project: Region 10 Results
Order Number PB92-963314CDH, price: PC A05/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Nov 91
The report is one in a series providing information on the
nature of the sites being evaluated by the Superfund site as-
sessment program. It is intended to provide a 'snapshot' of
sites in Region 10 on the NPL as of February 1991. Separate
reports are available for the other nine EPA regions and for
the nation as a whole.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 96p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Pollution
control, Superfund, National Priorities List.
0365 NPL Construction Completion Definition at
Bioremediation and Soil Vapor Extraction Sites
Order Number PB93-963327CDH, price: PC A01/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 21 Jun 93
The report discusses EPA's policy for categorizing bioreme-
diation and soil vapor extraction sites as Construction Com-
pletions. Technologies addressed are: in-situ soil vapor ex-
traction, in-situ bioremediation, and ex-situ bioremediation.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $225 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $450). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 5p.
Subject index keywords: Government policies, Construc-
tion, Hazardous materials, Superfund, Directives, National
Priority List.
0366 PA Review Checklist
Order Number PB93-963342CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 28 Apr 93
The preliminary assessment (PA) review checklist was de-
signed to evaluate the quality of PA work products. The
review will ensure that EPA decisions concerning the disposi-
tion of sites are made in a nationally consistent, scientifically
based, and efficient mariner. The order in which information
is presented in the PA does not have to be consistent with
the checklist, but the PA should be organized in a logical se-
quence and consistent with PA guidance. The checklist and
the PA guidance manual can be ordered from the National
Technical Information Service (NTIS) by calling 703-487-
4650 To order both documents, the order number is PB92-
963303. The checklist by itself is order number PB93-
963342.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $225 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $450). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. See also PB92-963303. 16p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Hazardous materials,
Waste disposal, Assessments.
0367 PA-Score (Preliminary Assessment Score) User's
Manual and Tutorial. Version 2.1
Order Number PB93-108322CDH, price: PC A05/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC.
Hazardous Site Evaluation Div; 16 Nov 92
The PA-Score software package is comprised of the PA-
Score and PA-Print computer programs and the users
manual. The PA-Score software package has been devel-
oped to assist preliminary assessment (PA) evaluations by
generating an upper bound estimate of the Hazard Ranking
System (HRS) score and associated documentation for a
site. The PA-Score computer program (PA-Score) assists in-
vestigators in meeting FA evaluation requirements. PA-Score
62
-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Assessment &
Listing
performs PA calculations from raw data to calculate site
scores. The PA-Print computer program (PA-Print) generates
PA scoresheets and the Potential Hazardous Waste Site Pre-
liminary Assessment form. The users manual provides in-
structions to install and use PA-Score and PA-Print.
Specifications: For system on diskette, see PB93-500346
and PB93-500353. 82p.
Subject index keywords: User manuals(Computer pro-
grams), Super-fund, Waste management, Hazardous materi-
als, Environmental surveys, Preliminary Assessment.
0368 PA-Score (Preliminary Assessment Score), Version
1.0 (for Microcomputers)
Order Number PB92-500032GDH, price: D02
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 91
The PA-Score computer program has been developed to
assist Superfund site assessment investigations in the
Hazard Ranking System (HRS) at the Preliminary Assess-
ment stage of site scoring. The Preliminary Assessment is
used to assess the relative threat associated with actual or
potential releases of hazardous substances to ground water
surface water, soil, and air.
Specifications: The software is on one, 5 1/4 inch diskette
1.2M high density. File format: ASCII documentation includ-
ed; may be ordered separately as PB92-963302. System-
IBM PC or compatible; MS DOS 3.0 operating system 384K
Language: Compiled C. See also PB92-500024 PB91-
507509, PB91-506964, PB90-502030, PB90-501487 PB89-
PB9'-59131'1'
Subject index keywords: Software, Superfund, Hazardous
materials, Waste management, Environmental surveys Pre-
liminary Assessment.
0369 PA-Score (Preliminary Assessment Score), Version
2.1, 3 1/2 inch (for Microcomputers)
Order Number PB93-500353CDH, price: D02
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington DC
Hazardous Site Evaluation Div; Oct 92
The PA-Score computer program has been developed to
assist Superfund site assessment investigations in' the
Hazard Ranking System (HRS) at the Preliminary Assess-
ment stage of site scoring. The Preliminary Assessment is
used to assess the relative threat associated with actual or
potential releases of hazardous substances to ground water
surface water, soil, and air. Version 2.1 is an update that re-
solves a programming error in the scoring of the resident
population targets for soil exposure.
Specifications: The software .is on one 3 1/2 inch diskette
1.44M high density. File format: ASCII. Documentation in-
cluded; may be ordered separately as PB93-108322. System-
IBM compatible; MS DOS operating system, 384K Lan-
guage: Compiled C. See also PB92-500024 PB91-507509
PB91-506964, PB90-502030, PB90-501487, PB89-186068'
PB92-592001, PB91-591331, PB91-591311, and PB90-
591781. Other formats available as 5 1/4 inch diskette
PB93-500346. 1 diskette.
Subject index keywords: Software, Superfund, Waste dis-
posal, Hazardous materials, Site surveys, Hazard Ranking
System.
0370 PA-Score (Preliminary Assessment Score), Version
2.1, 5 1/4 inch (for Microcomputers)
Order Number PB93-500346CDH, price: D02
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC.
Hazardous Site Evaluation Div; Oct 92
The PA-Score computer program has been developed to
assist Superfund site assessment investigations in the
Hazard Ranking System (HRS) at the Preliminary Assess-
ment stage of site scoring. The Preliminary Assessment is
used to assess the relative threat associated with actual or
potential releases of hazardous substances to ground water,
surface water, soil, and air. Version 2.1 is an update that re-
solves a programming error in the scoring of the resident
population targets for soil exposure.
Specifications: The software is on one (1) 5 1/4 inch dis-
kettes, 1.2M high density. File format: ASCII. Documentation
included; may be ordered separately as PB93-108322.
System: IBM PC or Compatible; MS DOS 3.0 operating
system, 384K. Language: Compiled C. Supersedes PB92-
500032. See also PB92-500024, PB91-507509, PB91-
506964, PB90-502030, PB90-501487, PB89-186068 PB92-
592001, PB91-591331, PB91-591311, and PB90-591781.
Other formats available as 31/2 inch, 1.44 MB diskette
PB93-500353.1 diskette.
Subject index keywords: Software, Superfund, Waste dis-
posal, Hazardous materials, Site surveys, Hazard Ranking
System.
0371 PA-Score Software, Version 1.0. Users Manual and
Tutorial
Order Number PB92-963302CDH, price: ,PC A04/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 91
The PA-Score software package is comprised of the PA-
Score and PA-Print computer programs and the users
manual. The PA-Score software package has been devel-
oped to assist preliminary assessment (PA) evaluations by
generating an upper bound estimate of the Hazard Ranking
System (HRS) score and associated documentation for a
site. The PA-Score computer program (PA-Score) assists in-
vestigators in meeting PA evaluation requirements. PA-Score
performs PA calculations from raw data to calculate site
scores. The PA-Print computer program (PA-Print) generates
PA scoresheets and the Potential Hazardous Waste Site Pre-
liminary Assessment form. The users manual provides in-
structions to install and use PA-Score and PA-Print.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. For system on diskette, see PB92-
500032. 73p. .
Subject index keywords: Superfund, User
manuals(Computer programs), Hazardous materials, Waste
management, Environmental surveys, Preliminary Assess-
ment.
0372 Preliminary Ranking Evaluation Score (PREscore)
Version 1.1 (for Microcomputers)
Order Number PB92-503507CDH, price: D02
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC.
Hazardous Site Evaluation Div; Jul 92
The PREscore computer program has been developed to
assist Superfund site assessment investigations in Hazard
63
-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Assessment & Listing
Ranking System (HRS) site scoring. The HRS is used to
assess the relative threat associated with actual or potential
releases of hazardous substances to ground water, surface
water, soil, and air. The HRS is the primary means by which
EPA evaluates sites for the National Priorities List (NPL), the
list of the hazardous waste sites that are eligible for remedial
funding under the Superfund program. PREscore is designed
to be user-friendly, operating via hierarchically-dependent
spreadsheets that allow data to be entered quickly and effi-
ciently. Significant program features include: instant score
calculation and continuous score display, multiple site-sce-
nario testing capability, extensive help screens, and compre-
hensive documentation ability. PREscore fully automates the
HRS, allowing for the entry and evaluation of all types of
site-related information. In addition, PREscore contains HRS-
related hazardous substance information derived from the
Agency's Superfund Chemical Data Matrix (SCDM), which in-
cludes substance characteristics. PREscore is accompanied
by PREprint, a program that produces an extensive docu-
mentation record for sites evaluated by PREscore.
Specifications: The software is on one 51/4 inch diskette,
1.2M high density. Documentation included; may be ordered
separately as PB92-963349. System: IBM-PC or compatible;
MS DOS 3.1 operating system, 384K. Language: Compiled
'C1. See also PB91-506964, PB92-592291, PB90-591791 and
PB92-500024.1 diskette.
Subject index keywords: Models-Simulation, Superfund,
Hazardous materials, Environmental impact assessments,
Waste disposal, PREscore program, Hazard Ranking System.
0373 Preliminary Ranking Evaluation Score (PREscore)
Version 2.0 (for Microcomputers)
Order Number PB93-505915CDH, price: DOS
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC.
Hazardous Site Evaluation Div; May 93
The PREscore computer program has been developed to
assist Superfund site assessment investigations in Hazard
Ranking System (HRS) site scoring. The HRS is used to
assess the relative threat associated with actual or potential
releases of hazardous substances to ground water, surface
water, soil, and air. PREscore is designed to be user-friendly,
operating via hierarchically-dependent spreadsheets that
allow data to be entered quickly and efficiently. Significant
program features include: Instant score calculation and con-
tinuous score display; Multiple site-scenario testing capability;
Extensive Help screens; Comprehensive documentation abili-
ty; PREscore fully automates the HRS, allowing for the entry
and evaluation of all types of site-related information includ-
ing sampling data, waste quantities and waste characteris-
tics, physical parameters of the site, population data, and ad-
ministrative information. In addition, PREscore contains HRS-
related hazardous substance information derived from the
Agency's Superfund Chemical Data Matrix (SCDM), which in-
cludes substance characteristics such as toxicity and persist-
ence, and concentration benchmarks for the substances
commonly encountered at Superfund sites. PREscore is ac-
companied by PREprint, a program that produces an exten-
sive documentation record for sites evaluated by PREscore.
Specifications: Both 31/2 inch and 51/4 inch high density
diskettes are provided. Documentation included; may be or-
dered separately as PB93-192698. System: IBM-PC or com-
patible; MS DOS 3.1 operating system, 384K. Language:
Compiled 'C'. Supersedes PB92-503507. See also PB90-
591791, PB92-592291, PB92-501774, PB93-500742, and
PB93-500353. 1 diskette.
Subject index keywords!: Software, Models-simulation, Su-
perfund, PREscore computer model.
0374 PREscore Software. Users Manual and Tutorial.
Version 1.0
Order Number PB92-963349CDH, price: PC A05/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 91
The manual serves as a users manual and tutorial for the
PREscore computer program. The PREscore package has
been developed by EPA Headquarters to assist site assess-
ment investigations and Hazard Ranking System scoring by
generating a Preliminary Ranking Evaluation (PRE)score and
associated documentation. The users manual consists of
three parts that introduce one to the software package and
take one through installation procedures, provide a tutorial by
walking one through screens, and provide instruction for
using PREprint to perform printing functions on PREscore
site files.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 85p.
Subject index keywords: Site surveys, Computer applica-
tions, Waste management, Hazardous materials, Superfund,
HRS(Hazard Ranking System).
0375 PREscore Software: Users Manual and Tutorial
Version 2.0
Order Number PB93-192698CDH, price: PC A05/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; May 93
The PREscore software package has been developed to
assist site assessment investigations and Hazard Ranking
System (HRS) scoring by generating a Preliminary Ranking
Evaluation score and associated documentation. The users
manual consists of three parts. Chapter 1, 'Getting Started',
introduces you to the software package and takes you
through the procedures necessary to install PREscore soft-
ware on your computer. Chapter 2, Tutorial', provides an ini-
tial step-by-step 'hands-on' lesson in using PREscore by
'walking' you through a series of screens, entering and edit-
ing data. Chapter 3, 'Printing', provides instruction for using
PREprint, which performs printing functions on PREscore site
files. The manual assumes some familiarity with the IBM PC-
type platform. Actual scoring of a site with PREscore re-
quires little, if any, knowledge of the Disk Operating System
(DOS).
Specifications: For system on diskette, see PB93-505915.
91p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste disposal, Haz-
ardous materials, PREscore computer model.
0376 Regional Quality Control Guidance for NPL
Candidate Sites
Order Number PB92-963352CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Dec 91
The guidance manual provides recommended procedures for
a Regional Quality Control program for the evaluation of
Hazard Ranking System packages. The guidance, intended
64
-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Assessment &
Listing
primarily for use by EPA Regional offices, is to standardize
Regional QC review and improve HRS package quality. The
document should serve anyone preparing or reviewing HRS
packages, and should complement other guidances for con-
ducting PAs and Sis, and applying the HRS, to assist Re-
gions in the site listing process.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 70p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Quality con-
trol, Ranking, Superfund, US EPA regions, National Priorities
List.
0377 Revised Hazard Ranking System: An Improved Tool
for Screening Superfund Sites
Order Number PB91-921307CDH, price: PC A01/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Nov 90
The Fact Sheet discusses the revised HRS which retains the
same cutoff score and basic approach as the original HRS
while incorporating SARA requirements as well as improve-
ments identified as necessary by EPA and the public. The re-
vised HRS retains the ground water, surface water, and air
pathways, drops the direct contact and fire/explosion path-
ways, and adds a fourth pathway, soil exposure. Several key
provisions of the revised HRS make it more comprehensive
Other provisions make the revised HRS more accurate. The
complexity and scope of the issues involved in revising the
HRS required EPA to get widespread input. The majority of
the commenters believed that the revised HRS represented
an improvement over the original HRS. The result is a re-
vised HRS that is a practical and effective tool in identifying
the nation's worst hazardous waste sites.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $150 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $300). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 4p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Hazardous materials,
On-site investigations, Waste management, Office of Solid
Waste and Emergency Response, Hazard Ranking System.
0378 Revised Hazard Ranking System: Background
Information
Order Number PB91 -921303CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Nov 90
The Fact Sheet discusses the Hazard Ranking System
(HRS) in response to the Superfund Amendments and Reau-
thorization Act of 1986 (SARA). The HRS is the scoring
system EPA uses to assess the relative threat associated
with the release or potential release of hazardous sub-
stances from a waste site. The HRS score is the primary cri-
terion EPA uses to determine whether a site should be
placed on the National Priorities List (NPL). The NPL identi-
fies sites that warrant further investigation to determine if
they pose risks to public health or the environment. Sites on
the NPL are eligible for long-term 'remedial action' financed
under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Com-
pensation, and Liability Act of 1980 (CERCLA), as amended
by SARA. SARA authorizes a 'Hazardous Substances Super-
fund' totalling $8.5 billion over 5 years to pay costs not as-
sumed by those responsible for problems at a site. The HRS
uses data that can be collected relatively quickly and inex-
pensively, thus allowing most Superfund resources to be di-
rected to remedial actions at sites on the NPL.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $150 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $300). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 13p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Hazardous materials,
On-site investigations, Waste management, Hazard Ranking
System, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response.
0379 Revised Hazard Ranking System: Evaluating Sites
After Waste Removals
Order Number PB92-963326CDH, price: PC A03
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Oct 91
The fact sheet defines the concept of 'qualifying removal',
explains how to score sites where qualifying removals have
been conducted, and discusses some of the management
implications of the removal policy. In addition, the fact sheet
provides examples of how to score sites where removals
have occurred.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 11 p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Project
management, Removal, Pollution control, Superfund.
0380 Revised Hazard Ranking System (HRS): Final Rule
Order Number PB91-100800CDH, price: PC A16/MF A02
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; 9 Nov 90
The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has revised
the Hazard Ranking System (HRS) in response to the Super-
fund Amendments and Reauthorization Act of 1986 (SARA).
The HRS is the scoring system EPA uses to assess the rela-
tive threat associated with the release or potential release of
hazardous substances from a waste site. The HRS score is
the primary criterion EPA uses to determine whether a site
should be placed on the National Priorities List (NPL). The
NPL identifies sites that warrant further investigation to deter-
mine if they pose risks to public health or the environment.
Sites on the NPL are eligible, for long-term 'remedial action'
financed under the Comprehensive Environmental Response,
Compensation and Liability Act of 1980 (CERCLA), as
amended by SARA. The revised HRS retains the same cutoff
score and basic approach as the original HRS, while incorpo-
rating SARA requirements as well as improvements identified
as necessary by EPA and the public. The revised HRS re-
tains the ground water, surface water, and air pathways
drops the direct contact and fire/explosion pathways, and
adds a forth pathway, soil exposure.
Specifications: 352p.
Subject index keywords: Ranking, Hazardous materials,
Pollution control, Superfund.
0381 Revised Hazard Ranking System: Qs and As
Order Number PB91-921305CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Nov 90
The Fact Sheet discusses U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) revised Hazard Ranking System (HRS) in re-
sponse to the Supertund Amendments and Reauthorization
65
-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Assessment & Listing
Act (SARA). These revised HRS Qs and As address the
SARA requirements for the revised MRS, specific revisions to
the HRS, the impact of the revised HRS on the site assess-
ment and remedial processes, and selection of the cutoff
score.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $150 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $300). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 8p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Hazardous materials,
Waste management, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
Response, Hazard Ranking System.
0382 Site Assessment Information Directory (SAID)
Region 1 (for Microcomputers). Date of Coverage:
October 1991
Order Number PB93-506111CDH, price: DOS
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC; Oct 91
The Site Assessment Information Directory (SAID) is a data-
base of information sources designed to support EPA Re-
gional, state, and contractor staff in data collection efforts for
site investigation activities. SAID is designed to assist data
collection activities, especially during Preliminary Assess-
ments (PAs) and Site Inspections (Sis), and to support
Hazard Ranking system (HRS) package preparation. SAID
entries are cross-referenced according to categories of infor-
mation and geographical areas and may be accessed in a
variety of ways. The SAID database system is supplemented
by a User's Guide and EPA region specific 'Phone book' list-
ing of information sources.
Specifications: The datafile is on one 31/2 inch diskette,
1.44M high density. Documentation included; may be ordered
separately as PB93-192797. System: IBM compatible; MS
DOS operating system. 480K RAM required (550— recom-
mended). See also Region 1 - PB93-506111, Region 2 -
PB93-506129, Region 3 - PB93-506137, Region 4 - PB93-
506145, Region 5 - PB93-506152, Region 6 - PB93-506160,
Region 7 - PB93-506178, Region 8 - PB93-506186, Region 9
- PB93-506194, Region 10 - PB93-506202. 1 diskette.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Data bases, Software,
SAID(Site Assessment Information Directory).
0383 Site Assessment Information Directory (SAID)
Region 2 (for Microcomputers). Date of Coverage:
October 1991
Order Number PB93-506129CDH, price: DOS
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC; Oct 91
The Site Assessment Information Directory (SAID) is a data-
base of information sources designed to support EPA Re-
gional, state, and contractor staff in data collection efforts for
site investigation activities. SAID is designed to assist data
collection activities, especially during Preliminary Assess-
ments (PAs) and Site Inspections (Sis), and to support
Hazard Ranking system (HRS) package preparation. SAID
entries are cross-referenced according to categories of infor-
mation and geographical areas and may be accessed in a
variety of ways. The SAID database system is supplemented
by a User's Guide and EPA region specific 'Phone book' list-
Ing of information sources.
Specifications: The datafile is on one 3 1/2 inch diskette,
1.44M high density. Documentation included; may be ordered
separately as PB93-192805. System: IBM compatible; MS
DOS operating system. 480K RAM required (550- recom-
mended). See also Region 1 - PB93-506111, Region 2 -
PB93-506129, Region 3 - PB93-506137, Region 4 - PB93-
506145, Rgion 5 - PB93-506152, Region 6 - PB93-506160,
Region 7 - PB93-506178, Region 8 - PB93-506186, Region 9
- PB93-506194, Region 10 - PB93-506202. 1 diskette.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Data bases, Software,
SAID(Site Assessment Information Directory).
0384 Site Assessment Information Directory (SAID)
Region 3 (for Microcomputers). Date of Coverage:
October 1991
Order Number PB93-506137CDH, price: DOS
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC; Oct 91
The Site Assessment Information Directory (SAID) is a data-
base of information sources designed to support EPA Re-
gional, state, and contractor staff in data collection efforts for
site investigation activities. SAID is designed to assist data
collection activities, especially during Preliminary Assess-
ments (PAs) and Site Inspections (Sis), and to support
Hazard Ranking system (HRS) package preparation. SAID
entries are cross-referenced according to categories of infor-
mation and geographical areas and may be accessed in a
variety of ways. The SAID database system is supplemented
by a User's Guide and EPA region specific 'Phone book' list-
ing of information sources.
Specifications: The datafile is on one 3 1/2 inch diskette,
1.44M high density. Documentation included; may be ordered
separately as PB93-192813. System: IBM compatible; MS
DOS operating system. 480K RAM required (550- recom-
mended). See also Region 1 - PB93-506111, Region 2 -
PB93-506129, Region 3 - PB93-506137, Region 4 - PB93-
506145, Region 5 - PB93-506152, Region 6 - PB93-506160,
Region 7 - PB93-506178, Region 8 - PB93-506186, Region 9
- PB93-506194, Region 1C) - PB93-506202. 1 diskette.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Data bases, Software,
SAID(Site Assessment Information Directory).
0385 Site Assessment Information Directory (SAID)
Region 4 (for Microcomputers). Date of Coverage:
October 1991
Order Number PB93-506145CDH, price: DOS
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC; Oct 91
The Site Assessment Information Directory (SAID) is a data-
base of information sources designed to support EPA Re-
gional, state, and contractor staff in data collection efforts for
site investigation activities. SAID is designed to assist data
collection activities, especially during Preliminary Assess-
ments (PAs) and Site Inspections (Sis), and to support
Hazard Ranking system (HRS) package preparation. SAID
entries are cross-referenced according to categories of infor-
mation and geographical areas and may be accessed in a
variety of ways. The SAID database system is supplemented
by a User's Guide and EPA region specific 'Phone book' list-
ing of information sources.
Specifications: The datafile is on one 3 1/2 inch diskette,
1.44M high density. Documentation included; may be ordered
separately as PB93-192821. System: IBM compatible; MS
DOS operating system. 480K RAM required (550— recom-
mended). See also Region 1 - PB93-506111, Region 2 -
PB93-506129, Region 3 - PB93-506137, Region 4 - PB93-
506145, Region 5 - PB93-506152, Region 6 - PB93-506160,
Region 7 - PB93-506178, Region 8 - PB93-506186, Region 9
- PB93-506194, Region 10 - PB93-506202. 1 diskette.
66
-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Assessment &
Listing
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Data bases, Software,
SAID(Site Assessment Information Directory).
0386 Site Assessment Information Directory (SAID)
Region 5 (for Microcomputers). Date of Coverage: 1991
Order Number PB93-506152CDH, price: DOS
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC; Oct 91
The Site Assessment Information Directory (SAID) is a data-
base of information sources designed to support EPA Re-
gional, state, and contractor staff in data collection efforts for
site investigation activities. SAID is designed to assist data
collection activities, especially during Preliminary Assess-
ments (PAs) and Site Inspections (Sis), and to support
Hazard Ranking system (MRS) package preparation. SAID
entries are cross-referenced according to categories of infor-
mation and geographical areas and may be accessed in a
variety of ways. The SAID database system is supplemented
by a User's Guide and EPA region specific 'Phone book' list-
ing of information sources.
Specifications: The datafile is on one 3 1/2 inch diskette,
1.44M high density. Documentation included; may be ordered
separately as PB93-192839. System: IBM compatible; MS
DOS operating system. 480K RAM required (550- recom-
mended). See also Region 1 - PB93-506111, Region 2 -
PB93-506129, Region 3 - PB93-506137, Region 4 - PB93-
506145, Region 5 - PB93-506152, Region 6 - PB93-506160
Region 7 - PB93-506178, Region 8 - PB93-506186, Region 9
- PB93-506194, Region 10 - PB93-506202. 1 diskette.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Data bases, Software,
SAID(Site Assessment Information Directory).
0387 Site Assessment Information Directory (SAID)
Region 6 (for Microcomputers). Date of Coverage-
October 1991
Order Number PB93-506160CDH, price: DOS
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC; Oct 91
The Site Assessment Information Directory (SAID) is a data-
base of information sources designed to support EPA Re-
gional, state, and contractor staff in data collection efforts for
site investigation activities. SAID is designed to assist data
collection activities, especially during Preliminary Assess-
ments (PAs) and Site Inspections (Sis), and to support
Hazard Ranking system (HRS) package preparation. SAID
entries are cross-referenced according to categories of infor-
mation and geographical areas and may be accessed in a
variety of ways. The SAID database system is supplemented
by a User's Guide and EPA region specific 'Phone book' list-
ing of information sources.
Specifications: The datafile is on one 3 1/2 inch diskette,
1.44M high density. Documentation included; may be ordered
separately as PB93-192847. System: IBM compatible; MS
DOS operating system. 480K RAM required (550- recom-
mended). See also Region 1 - PB93-506111, Region 2 -
PB93-506129, Region 3 - PB93-506137, Region 4 - PB93-
506145, Region 5 - PB93-506152, Region 6 - PB93-506160
Region 7 - PB93-506178, Region 8 - PB93-506186, Region 9
- PB93-506194, Region 10 - PB93-506202. 1 diskette.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Data bases, Software,
SAID(Site Assessment Information Directory).
0388 Site Assessment Information Directory (SAID)
Region 7 (for Microcomputers). Date of Coverage:
October 1991
Order Number PB93-506178CDH, price: DOS
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC; Oct 91
The Site Assessment Information Directory (SAID) is a data-
base of information sources designed to support EPA Re-
gional, state, and contractor staff in data collection efforts for
site investigation activities. SAID is designed to assist data
collection activities, especially during Preliminary Assess-
ments (PAs) and Site Inspections (Sis), and to support
Hazard Ranking system (HRS) package preparation. SAID
entries are cross-referenced according to categories of infor-
mation and geographical areas and may be accessed in a
variety of ways. The SAID database system is supplemented
by a User's Guide and EPA region specific 'Phone book' list-
ing of information sources.
Specifications: The datafile is on one 3 1/2 inch diskette,
1.44M high density. Documentation included; may be ordered
separately as PB93-192854. System: IBM compatible; MS
DOS operating system. 480K RAM required (550— recom-
mended). See also Region 1 - PB93-506111, Region 2 -
PB93-506129, Region 3 - PB93-506137, Region 4 - PB93-
506145, Region 5 - PB93-506152, Region 6 - PB93-506160,
Region 7 - PB93-506178, Region 8 - PB93-506186, Region 9
- PB93-506194, Region 10 - PB93-506202. 1 diskette.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Data bases, Software,
SAID(Site Assessment Information Directory).
0389 Site Assessment Information Directory (SAID)
Region 8 (for Microcomputers). Date of Coverage: 1991
Order Number PB93-506186CDH, price: DOS
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC; Oct 91
The Site Assessment Information Directory (SAID) is a data-
base of information sources designed to support EPA Re-
gional, state, and contractor staff in data collection efforts for
site investigation activities. SAID is designed to assist data
collection activities, especially during Preliminary Assess-
ments (PAs) and Site Inspections (Sis), and to support
Hazard Ranking system (HRS) package preparation. SAID
entries are cross-referenced according to categories of infor-
mation and geographical areas and may be accessed in a
variety of ways. The SAID database system is supplemented
by a User's Guide and EPA region specific 'Phone book' list-
ing of information sources.
Specifications: The datafile is on one 3 1/2 inch diskette,
1.44M high density. Documentation included; may be ordered
separately as PB93-213817. System: IBM compatible; MS
DOS operating system. 480K RAM required (550- recom-
mended). See also Region 1 - PB93-506111, Region 2 -
PB93-506129, Region 3 - PB93-506137, Region 4 - PB93-
506145, Region 5 - PB93-506152, Region 6 - PB93-506160,
Region 7 - PB93-506178, Region 8 - PB93-506186, Region 9
- PB93-506194, Region 10 - PB93-506202. 1 diskette.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Data bases, Software,
SAID(Site Assessment Information Directory).
67
-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Assessment & Listing
0390 Site Assessment Information Directory (SAID)
Region 9 (for Microcomputers). Date of Coverage:
October 1991
Order Number PB93-506194CDH, price: DOS
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC; Oct 91
The Site Assessment Information Directory (SAID) is a data-
base of information sources designed to support EPA Re-
gional, state, and contractor staff in data collection efforts for
site investigation activities. SAID is designed to assist data
collection activities, especially during Preliminary Assess-
ments (PAs) and Site Inspections (Sis), and to support
Hazard Ranking system (HRS) package preparation. SAID
entries are cross-referenced according to categories of infor-
mation and geographical areas and may be accessed in a
variety of ways. The SAID database system is supplemented
by a User's Guide and EPA region specific 'Phone book' list-
ing of information sources.
Specifications: The datafile is on one 3 1/2 inch diskette,
1.44M high density. Documentation included; may be ordered
separately as PB93-213825. System: IBM compatible; MS
DOS operating system. 480K RAM required (550- recom-
mended). See also Region 1 - PB93-506111, Region 2 -
PB93-506129, Region 3 - PB93-506137, Region 4 - PB93-
506145, Region 5 - PB93-506152, Region 6 - PB93-506160,
Region 7 - PB93-506178, Region 8 - PB93-506186, Region 9
- PB93-506194, Region 10 - PB93-506202. 1 diskette.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Data bases, Software,
SAID(Site Assessment Information Directory).
0391 Site Assessment Information Directory (SAID)
Region 10 (for Microcomputers). Date of Coverage:
October 1991
Order Number PB93-506202CDH, price: DOS
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC; Oct 91
The Site Assessment Information Directory (SAID) is a data-
base of information sources designed to support EPA Re-
gional, state, and contractor staff in data collection efforts for
site investigation activities. SAID is designed to assist data
collection activities, especially during Preliminary Assess-
ments (PAs) and Site Inspections (Sis), and to support
Hazard Ranking system (HRS) package preparation. SAID
entries are cross-referenced according to categories of infor-
mation and geographical areas and may be accessed in a
variety of ways. The SAID database system is supplemented
by a User's Guide and EPA region specific 'Phone book' list-
Ing of information sources.
Specifications: The datafile is on one 31/2 inch diskette,
1.44M high density. Documentation included; may be ordered
separately as PB93-213833. System: IBM compatible; MS
DOS operating system. 480K RAM required (550— recom-
mended). See also Region 1 - PB93-506111, Region 2 -
PB93-506129, Region 3 - PB93-506137, Region 4 - PB93-
506145, Region 5 - PB93-506152, Region 6 - PB93-506160,
Region 7 - PB93-506178, Region 8 - PB93-506186, Region 9
- PB93-506194, Region 10 - PB93-506202. 1 diskette.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Data bases, Software,
SAID(Site Assessment Information Directory).
0392 Standard Document for Remedial Site Assessment
Decisions
Order Number PB93-963288CDH, price: PC A01/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 8 Dec 92
The National Contingency Plan (NCP) requires the U.S. Envi-
ronmental Protection Agesncy (EPA) to assess all releases
and threatened releases throughout the United States pursu-
ant to the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Com-
pensation and Liability Act of 1980 (CERCLA), as amended.
In accordance with the NCP, EPA conducts PAs and Sis to
assess sites where releases or threatened releases may
exist After evaluating information collected during a PA or
SI, EPA then decides on the need for further investigative or
response action. All Regions document remedial site assess-
ment decisions, but procedures vary. To ensure adequate
documentation of such decisions, the site assessment pro-
gram has developed a standard site assessment decision
sheet.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 4p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Hazardous materials,
Waste disposal.
0393 Superfund Fact Sheet: Exposure Pathways
Order Number PB93-963306CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Sep 92
The fact sheet describes exposure pathways, the different
manners in which people can be exposed to hazardous ma-
terials. Explanations of several pathways involving surface
waters, ground water, air, soil, and the food chain are given.
The fact sheet is one in a series providing reference informa-
tion about Superfund issues and is intended for readers with
no formal scientific training.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 8p.
Subject index keywords!: Environmental exposure pathway,
Path of pollutants, Hazardous materials, Public health, Super-
fund.
0394 Supplemental Guide to Video on Superfund Site
Assessment Screening: A National Priority
Order Number PB93-963323CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Jan 93
EPA's Superfund program uses a systematic site assessment
screening process to determine which hazardous waste sites
should be considered a national priority. The site assessment
screening process is an objective, methodical process that
follows established procedures and uses a uniform set of de-
cision-making criteria. The video is intended for state, EPA,
or contractor personnel who perform site assessment
screening for Superfund. The video gives an overview of the
Superfund site assessment screening process and provides
those performing the tasks an overall understanding of their
work.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
68
-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Compliance With
Other Laws
and Mexico; ail others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 63p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Site surveys, Risk as-
sessment.
0395 Update No. 2 to 'Procedures for Completion and
Deletion of NPL Sites'
Order Number PB92-963344CDH, price: PC A01/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; 19 Feb 92
The purpose of the directive is to revise EPA guidance to
clarify the distinction between the terms 'site completion' and
'construction completion.'
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 5p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Pollution
control, Superfund.
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION:
Compliance With Other Laws
0396 ARAR's Q's and A's. Compliance with the Toxicity
Characteristics Rule. Part 1
Order Number PB90-273814CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; May 90
The document is a part of a series of fact sheets that pro-
vide answers to questions that arose in developing applica-
ble or relevant and appropriate requirements (ARARs) poli-
cies, training sessions, and in identifying and complying with
ARARs at specific sites. The sheet addresses compliance
with the recently promulgated Toxicity Characteristics Rule
(55 FR 11798, March 29, 1990).
Specifications: 6p.
Subject index keywords: Project management, Hazardous
materials, Toxicity, Superfund, Office of Solid Waste and
Emergency Response, Waste management, Remedial action.
0397 ARARs Fact Sheet: Compliance with the Clean Air
Act and Associated Air Quality Requirements
Order Number PB92-963282CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Sep 92
The fact sheet provides updated guidance on compliance
with the Clean Air Act, as amended November 1990 (42 USC
7401 et. seq.) and related air quality rules under other envi-
ronmental statutes. It also addresses developing applicable
or relevant and appropriate requirements (ARARs) policies
and identifying and complying with ARARs at specific sites.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, De-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 30p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
Hazardous materials, Air pollution abatement, Office of Solid
Waste and Emergency Response.
0398 ARARs Q's and A's
Order Number PB90-273780CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; May 89
The document is part of a series of fact sheets that provide
answers to questions that arose in developing applicable or
relevant and appropriate requirements (ARARs) policies,
training sessions, and in identifying and complying with
ARARs at specific sites. Responses covered in the fact
sheet reflect current program practice and include policies
and language from the proposed National Contingency Plan
(NCP).
Specifications: 7p.
Subject index keywords: Project management, Hazardous
materials, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response,
Superfund, Remedial action, Remedial response, Waste
management.
0399 ARARS Q's and A's: Compliance with Federal Water
Quality Criteria
Order Number PB90-274267CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Jun 90
The document is part of a series of fact sheets that provide
answers to questions that arose in developing applicable or
relevant and appropriate requirements (ARARs) policies,
training sessions, and in identifying and complying with
ARARs at specific sites. The sheet addresses compliance
with Federal Water Quality Criteria as ARARs.
Specifications: See also PB90-273780. 11 p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Project
management, Water quality, Superfund, Waste management,
Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response.
0400 ARARs Q's and A's Compliance with New SDWA
National Primary Drinking Water Regulations for Organic
and Inorganic Chemicals
Order Number PB91-921363CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Jul 91
The report provides guidance on questions that arose in de-
veloping ARAR policies, and in indentifying and complying
with ARARs at specific sites concerning the new Safe Drink-
ing Water Regulations (Phase II), which were promulgated on
January 30, 1991.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $150 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $300). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 7p.
Subject: index keywords: Water quality, Drinking water,
Water pollution, Superfund.
0401 ARARs Q's and A's: Genera! Policy, RCRA, CWA,
SDWA, Post-ROD Information, and Contingent Waivers
Order Number PB91-921341CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Jul 91
These 'ARARs Q's and A's' are part of a series of Fact
Sheets that provide guidance on a number of question that
arose in developing ARAR policies, in ARARs training ses-
sion, and in identifying and complying with ARARs at specific
sites. This particular Q's and A's Fact Sheet updates and re-
places a Fact Sheet which was first issued in May 1989.
69
-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Compliance With
Other Laws
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $150 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $300). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 7p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
Hazardous materials, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
Response.
0402 ARARs Q's and A's: State Ground-Water
Antidegradation Issues
Order Number PB91-921311CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Jul 90
The Fact Sheet discusses, section 121(d)(2) of CERCLA, as
amended by the 1986 Superfund Amendments and Reau-
thorization Act (SARA), requires that remedial actions must
at least attain Federal and more stringent State applicable or
relevant and appropriate requirements (ARARs) upon com-
pletion of the remedial action. The Q's and A's fact sheet is
designed to provide guidance on the status of State ground-
water antidegradation provisions as potential ARARs for
CERCLA ground-water and soil remedial actions. The guid-
ance in the fact sheet reiterates Agency policy already in
practice In EPA's Regional offices. The goal and policy of the
Superfund program is to return usable ground water to its
beneficial uses within the timeframe that is reasonable, given
the particular circumstances of the site. In addition to their
goal of ground-water cleanup, Superfund has a nondegrada-
tion policy in that they strive for the prevention of further
degradation of the ground water during their remedial ac-
tions. However, it should be noted that more stringent State
standards than those imposed by EPA policy may be im-
posed by State antidegradation requirements. Such State re-
quirements, if they have been determined to be ARARs for
the site, would have to be met (e.g., by meeting the dis-
charge requirements) or waived (e.g., by the interim remedy
waiver). Nevertheless, even where temporary degradation of
the ground water may be required during the remedial action,
they will provide protection by restricting access or providing
institutional controls, and EPA response actions will ultimate-
ly result in restoration of the ground water's beneficial uses.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $150 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $300). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 9p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Hazardous materials,
Water pollution abatement, Land pollution abatement,
Ground water, Waste management, Applicable or Relevant
and Appropriate Requirements, Office of Solid Waste and
Emergency Response.
0403 ARARs Q's and A's: The Fund-Balancing Waiver
Order Number PB91-921321CDH, price: PC A01/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Jan 91
The fact sheet implements the applicable or relevant and ap-
propriate requirements (ARARs) provisions EPA has devel-
oped guidance and provided training to Regions and States
on the identification of and compliance with ARARs. It is part
of a series that provide guidance on a number of questions
that arose in developing ARARs policies, in ARARs training
sessions, and in identifying and complying with ARARs at
specific sites. The fact sheet addresses the Fund-balancing
waiver.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $150 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $300). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 5p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
Hazardous materials, Applicable or Relevant and Appropriate
Requirements, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Re-
sponse, Fund-balancing waivers.
0404 CERCLA Compliance with Other Environmental
Statutes
Order Number PB91-214098CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 2 Oct 85
The directive sets forth the Environmental Protection Agency
(EPA) policy on the applicability of the standards, criteria,
advisories, and guidance of other State and Federal environ-
mental and public health statutes to actions taken pursuant
to sections 104 and 106 of the Comprehensive Environmen-
tal Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980
(CERCLA). The policy addresses considerations for on-site
and off-site actions taken under CERCLA.
Specifications: Portions of this document are not fully legi-
ble. 22p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
Hazardous materials, Office of Emergency and Remedial Re-
sponse.
0405 CERCLA Compliance with Other Laws Manual:
CERCLA Compliance wilth State Requirements
Order Number PB90-272543CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Dec 89
The fact sheet provides a guide to chapter 6 of Part II of the
'CERCLA Compliance with Other Laws Manual.' The fifth in a
series, this fact sheet discusses CERCLA compliance with
State requirements, based on policies in proposed revisions
to the National Contingency Plan.
Specifications: See also PB90-272535. 8p.
Subject index keywords: Project management, Superfund,
Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response, National
contingency plan.
0406 CERCLA Compliance with Other Laws Manual:
CERCLA Compliance with the CWA and SDWA
Order Number PB90-273806CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Feb 90
The fact sheet provides a guide to Chapters 3 and 4 of Part I
of the 'CERCLA Compliance with Other Laws Manual.' The
sixth in a series, the fact sheet focuses on CERCLA compli-
ance with the Clean Water Act (Chapter 3), and Safe Drink-
ing Water Act (Chapter 4), and discusses other statutes with
provisions relevant to surface water or drinking water.
Specifications: 10p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Guidelines,
Project management, Superfund, Waste management, Office
of Solid Waste and Emergency Response.
70
-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Compliance With
Other Laws
0407 CERCLA Compliance with Other Laws Manual:
Guide to Manual
Order Number PB90-274242CDH, price: PC A01/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 89
The document serves as a guide to the use of the 'CERCLA
Compliance with Other Laws Manual.' Second in a series,
the Fact Sheet discusses implementation of Applicable or
Relevant and Appropriate Requirements (ARARs) provisions
in the proposed revisions to the National Contingency Plan
(NCP).
Specifications: See also PB90-148461 and PB90-272535
4p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Guidelines,
Project management, Superfund, Waste management, Office
of Solid Waste and Emergency Response.
0408 CERCLA Compliance with Other Laws Manual:
Overview of ARARs - Focus on ARAR Waivers
Order Number PB90-273798CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Dec 89
The fact sheet summarizes Chapter I Part I of the 'CERCLA
Compliance With Other Laws Manual: Part I.' The third in a
series, the fact sheet provides an overview of Applicable or
Relevant and Appropriate Requirements (ARARs) based on
policies in proposed revisions to the National Contingency
Plan (NCP).
Specifications: 8p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Project
: management, Superfund, Office of Solid Waste and Emer-
gency Response, Waste management, Comprehensive Envi-
ronmental Response Compensation and Liability Act, Reme-
dial action.
0409 CERCLA Compliance with Other Laws Manual. Part
1. Interim Final
Order Number PB90-272535CDH, price: PC A11/MF A02
IGF, Inc., Fairfax, VA.; Environmental Protection Agency,
Washington, DC. Office of Emergency and Remedial .
Response; 8 Aug 88
The manual is developed to provide guidance to Remedial
Project Managers (RPMs), State personnel at State-lead Su-
perfund sites, On-Scene Coordinators (OSCs), and other per-
sons responsible for planning response actions under the
Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation,
and Liability Act (CERCLA). The guidance is intended to
assist in the selection of on-site remedial actions that meet
the applicable, or relevant and appropriate requirements
(ARARs) of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act
(RCRA), Clean Water Act (CWA), Safe Drinking Water Act
(SDWA), Clean Air Act (CAA), and other Federal and State
environmental laws as required by CERCLA.
Specifications: See also PB90-272550. Sponsored by Envi-
ronmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response. 244p.
Subject index keywords: Manuals, Laws, Pollution regula-
tion, Remedial action, Remedial response, Waste manage-
ment.
0410 CERCLA Compliance with Other Laws Manual:
RCRA ARARS-Focus on Closure Requirements
Order Number PB90-274259CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Oct 89
The document serves as a guide to the use of the 'CERCLA
Compliance with Other Laws Manual: Parts I and II.' The
fourth in a series, the Fact Sheet addresses compliance with
Subtitle C of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act
(RCRA), as amended by the Hazardous and Solid Waste
Amendments of 1984, with a focus on the RCRA Subtitle C
disclosure requirements.
Specifications: See also PB90-273798. 9p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Project
management, Superfund, Waste management, Office of Solid
Waste and Emergency Response, Resource Conservation
and Recovery Act.
0411 CERCLA Compliance with Other Laws Manual:
Summary and Part 2. CAA, TSCA, and Other Statutes
Order Number PB90-272550CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Apr 90
The fact sheet provides a guide to Chapters 2 and 3 of Part
II of the 'CERCLA Compliance With Other Laws Manual.'
The sixth in a series, this fact sheet focuses on CERCLA
compliance with the Clean Air Act (CAA), the Toxic Sub-
stances Control Act (TSCA), and the Federal Insecticide,
Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act. In addition, it discusses
other statutes that set standards for radioactive wastes,
mining wastes, and other resource protection statutes that
are potential Applicable or Relevant and Appropriate Re-
quirements (ARARs) for CERCLA actions.
Specifications: See also PB90-272543. 11 p.
Subject index keywords: Project management, Superfund,
Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response.
0412 CERCLA Compliance with the RCRA Toxicity
Characteristics (TC) Rule: Part 2
Order Number PB91-921309CDH, price: PC A01/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Oct 90
The Fact Sheet discusses CERCLA remedial actions which
must comply with the requirements of the Resource Conser-
vation and Recovery Act (RCRA) when they are determined
to be applicable or relevant and appropriate requirements
(ARARs) unless a waiver is justified. For RCRA Subtitle C
hazardous waste requirements to be applicable, the CERCLA
response action must constitute either treatment, storage,
transport, or disposal of a RCRA hazardous waste. There-
fore, to make determinations about the applicability or rel-
evance and appropriateness of RCRA requirements, site
managers need to understand how to identify whether a
CERCLA waste is a RCRA hazardous waste (including when
a waste exhibits the newly promulgated toxicity characteris-
tics (TC)). The purpose of the guide, the second dealing with
the TC rule (see ARARs Qs & As, Compliance with the Tox-
icity Characteristics Rule: Part I, May 1990, Publication
9234.2-08FS) is to provide a general framework for manag-
ing CERCLA wastes in accordance with the new require-
ments.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $150 U.S., Canada,
71
-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Compliance With
Other Laws
and Mexico; all others $300). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 5p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
Hazardous materials, Remedial action, Toxic substances,
Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response, Compre-
hensive Environmental Response Compensation and Liability
Act
0413 CERCLA (Comprehensive Environmental Response,
Compensation and Liability Act) Compliance with Other
Laws Manual: Part 2. Clean Air Act and Other
Environmental Statutes and State Requirements
Order Number PB90-148461CDH, price: PC A09/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Aug 89
The purpose of the CERCLA Compliance with Other Laws
Manual is to assist Remedial Project Managers (RPMs) in
identifying and complying with all applicable or relevant and
appropriate requirements (ARARs) for remedial actions taken
at Superfund sites. This part of the guidance manual ad-
dresses CERCLA compliance with the Clean Air Act and
other environmental statutes for remedial actions.
Specifications: 176p.
Subject index keywords: Statutes, Environmental impacts,
States(United States).
0414 CERCLA Off-Site Policy - Eligibility of Facilities in
Assessment Monitoring
Order Number PB90-249632CDH, price: PC A01/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; 28 Jul 86
The directive clarifies application of the CERCLA off-site
policy to RCRA commercial facilities in assessment monitor-
ing.
Specifications: 5p.
Subject index keywords: Regulations, Facilities, Superfund,
Remedial action, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Re-
sponse, Assessment monitoring, Businesses.
0415 CERCLA Off-Site Policy: Providing Notice to
Facilities
Order Number PB90-249624CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 12 May 86
The directive assists in providing notice to commercial treat-
ment, storage, and disposal (TSDs) facilities deemed ineligi-
ble to receive CERCLA response wastes. Outlines proce-
dures for facilities to submit written comments on the appli-
cation of the policy to the conditions alleged at their facility.
Specifications: 8p.
Subject index keywords: Regulations, Waste disposal, Su-
perfund, Remedial action, Office of Solid Waste and Emer-
gency Response.
0416 CERCLA Removal Actions at Methane Release Sites
Order Number PB91-190850CDH, price: PC A01/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 23 Jan 86
The directive clarifies OERR policy on the appropriateness of
removal actions at methane gas release sites under authority
of CERCLA. CERCLA responses to methane gas releases
should be carefully evaluated on a case-by-case basis. Al-
though the proposed removal action is authorized under
CERCLA 104(a)(1), the responsible party may not be liable
under section 107 for removal action costs.
Specifications: 4p.
Subject index keywords;: Air pollution control, Superfund,
Waste disposal, Methane, Office of Solid Waste and Emer-
gency Response.
0417 Compendium of CERCLA ARARs fact sheets and
directives
Order Number DE92004878CDH, price: PC A12/MF A03
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response. USDOE Assistant
Secretary for Environment, Safety, and Health, Washington,
DC (United States). Office of Environmental Guidance; Oct
91
Section 121 (d) of the Comprehensive Environmental Re-
sponse Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA) as amend-
ed by the Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization Act
of 1986 (SARA), requires attainment of Federal and State
applicable and relevant and appropriate requirements
(ARARs). Subparts E, Section 300.400(g) "Identification of
applicable or relevant and appropriate requirements" of the
National Oil and Hazardous Substances Pollution Contingen-
cy Plan (NCP) (55 CFR 8666, March 8, 1990) describes the
process for attaining ARARs. The purpose of this compendi-
um is to provide you with a complete and current source of
"Quick Reference Fact Sheets" and Directives on applicable
and relevant and appropriate requirements (ARARs). These
fact sheets provide overviews of the ARARs for CERCLA
cleanup actions. The Compendium of CERCLA ARARs con-
sists of seven (7) chapters: lists of general fact sheets that
provide introductory information on ARARs; Chapter 2 dis-
cusses air emissions from Superfund air strippers; Chapter 3
deals with Indian Tribal involvement in the Superfund pro-
gram; Chapter 4 discusses soil lead cleanup levels at Super-
fund sites; Chapter 5 discusses the risk associated with Su-
perfund cleanups; Chapter 6 contains four sections that dis-
cuss a variety of RCRA ARARs such as general guidance
topics, land disposal restrictions, Superfund LDR guides, and
toxicity characteristics; and finally, Chapter 7 contains a vari-
ety of ARAR fact sheets and directives on Wastewater, Safe
Drinking Water Act and Groundwater.
Specifications: 254p.
Subject index keywords: Pollution Laws, US Superfund,
Remedial Action, Waste Management.
0418 Compliance with Third Third Requirements Under
the LDRs. Superfund LDR Guide No. 8
Order Number PB91-921313CDH, price: PC A01/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Oct 90
The 1984 Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA)
require EPA to promulgate regulations restricting the land
disposal of RCRA hazardous wastes. EPA previously promul-
gated regulations restricting the land disposal of solvent- and
dioxin-containing, California list, First Third, and Second Third
wastes. The Guide (the eigth in a series of LDR guides pre-
pared by the Office of Emergency and Remedial Response
(OERR)) summarizes the key provisions of the Third Third
LDR rule and discusses potential implications for CERCLA
response actions. More detailed guidance on Superfund
compliance with the LDRs is being prepared by the Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response (OSWER).
72
-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Compliance With
Other Laws
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $150 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $300). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 4p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Guidelines, Hazardous
materials, Waste treatment, Remedial action.
0419 Consideration of ARARs during Removal Actions
Order Number PB92-963410CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Apr 92
The fact sheet summarizes a Superfund Removal Proce-
dures (SRP) volume entitled 'Guidance on the Consideration
of ARARs During Removal Actions' which describes the es-
sential components of applicable or relevant and appropriate
requirements (ARARs) for on-site removal actions, including
identification of potential Federal and State ARARs, determi-
nation of when compliance with ARARs is not required, and
documentation of ARARs evaluations.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. See also PB92-963401. 6p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Removal,
Superfund.
0420 Consideration of RCRA Requirements in Performing
CERCLA Responses at Mining Waste Sites
Order Number PB91-214205CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; 19 Aug 86
The directive discusses mining wastes which will not be reg-
ulated under Subtitle C of RCRA. Mining waste problems will
be addressed by developing a program for regulation under
Subtitle D. In the interim, Superfund will continue to address
these mining waste problems through the RI/FS and ROD/
EDO processes taking into account current Subtitle D re-
quirements as well as options for addressing risks not ad-
dressed by Subtitle D requirements.
Specifications: Portions of this document are not fully legi-
ble. 13p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
Mine wastes, Hazardous materials, Office of Solid Waste and
Emergency Response.
0421 Discharge of Wastewater from CERCLA Sites into
POTWS
Order Number PB90-249616CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; 15 Apr 86
The directive addresses the concerns and issues unique to
publicly owned treatment works (POTWs) that must be evalu-
ated before the discharge of CERCLA wastewater to a
POTW.
Specifications: 8p.
Subject index keywords: Regulations, Waste water, Waste
disposal, Superfund, Remedial action, Publicly owned treat-
ment works, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Re-
• sponse.
0422 Guide to Delisting of RCRA Wastes for Superfund
Remedial Responses
Order Number PB90-274374CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 90
The fact sheet discusses the circumstances under which de-
listing wastes may be appropriate, and the procedures for
delisting a Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA)
hazardous waste as part of a Superfund remedial response.
Specifications: 9p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Guidelines,
Superfund, Waste management, Office of Solid Waste and
Emergency Response, Remedial response.
0423 Guide to Discharging CERCLA Aqueous Wastes to
Publicly Owned Treatment Works (POTWs)
Order Number PB91-921364CDH, price: PC A01/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Mar 91
The guide provides quick reference to the statutory, policy,
administrative, and technical factors involved in discharging
aqueous wastes generated during Superfund response ac-
tions to a POTW.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit,$150 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $300). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 5p.
Subject index keywords: Waste disposal, Waste treatment,
Hazardous materials, Superfund.
0424 Guide to Obtaining No Migration Variances for
CERCLA Remedial Actions
Order Number PB91-921367CDH, price: PC A01/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Apr 91
A 'No Migration' Variance allows land disposal of restricted
wastes not meeting the LDR treatment standards in a specif-
ic unit. The guide outlines procedures for obtaining a No Mi-
gration Variance for RCRA hazardous wastes as part of a
CERCLA response when the LDRs are ARAR.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $150 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $300). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 5p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste dis-
posal, Waste treatment, Superfund.
0425 Hazardous Waste Operations and Emergency
Response: Uncontrolled Hazardous Waste Sites and
RCRA Corrective Actions
Order Number PB91-921339CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Apr 91
The purpose of the Fact Sheet is to explain the principle re-
quirements of the EPA and OSHA worker protection stand-
ards as they apply to employees engaged in hazardous
waste operations at uncontrolled hazardous waste sites, in-
cluding employees who perform corrective actions at RCRA
TSD facilities.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $150 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $300). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 16p.
73
-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Compliance With
Other Laws
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
Hazardous materials, Occupational safety and health, Office
of Solid Waste and Emergency Response.
0426 Homeowners Exempted from Superfund Cleanup
Costs: National Policy Overview
Order Number PB92-963336CDH, price: PC A01 /MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Nov 91
The USEPA has established a national policy declaring the
average homeowner will not be required to conduct or pay
for cleanup when residential property is part of a federal Su-
perfund site. The national policy and guideline clarifies Su-
perfund's liability system which maintains owners and opera-
tors of properties in need of federal cleanup action are po-
tentially liable for those actions. EPA may hold homeowners
liable for cleanup where their own actions have led to a re-
lease or threatened release of hazardous substances requir-
ing a cleanup of their property, or where the property is used
for non-residential purpose. The policy is designed to allevi-
ate concerns about cleanup liability for homeowners, as well
as parties involved in real estate transactions, such as lend-
ers and title insurers.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 5p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Residential
buildings, Liabilities, Pollution control, Superfund, Cleanup.
0427 Interim RCRA/CERCLA Guidance on Non-
Contiguous Sites and On-Site Management on Waste
and Treatment Residue
Order Number PB90-274317CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; 27 Mar 86
The directive presents interim guidance with respect to com-
bined treatment of CERCLA waste from non-contiguous loca-
tions; on-site disposal of treatment residue; limitations on
construction of hazardous waste incinerators for on-site
CERCLA use, and off-site treatment of waste and redisposal
on site.
Specifications: 11 p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Guidelines,
Project management, Waste treatment, Superfund, Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response, Waste management,
Remedial action.
0428 Land Disposal Restrictions as Relevant and
Appropriate Requirements for CERCLA Contaminated
Soil and Debris
Order Number PB91-214973CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; 5 Jun 89
Until a rulemaking is completed that establishes treatment
standards for soil and debris, OSWER has concluded that
Land Disposal Restrictions (LDRs) generally should not be
considered as relevant and appropriate for soil or debris that
does not contain restricted RCRA wastes. The directive
gives suggested language to be incorporated into feasibility
study. For further clarification, the directive has included as
an attachment, directive 9347.1-02.
Specifications: 13p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
Hazardous materials, Land Disposal Restrictions, Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response.
0429 Notification of Out-of-State Shipments of Superfund
Site Wastes
Order Number PB90-272618CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; 14 Sep 89
The directive implements EPA's policy that prior to the off-
site shipment of Superfund site wastes to an out-of-State
management facility, EPA Regional personnel will provide
notice to that State's environmental officials.
Specifications: 6p.
Subject index keywords: Interstate transportation, Super-
fund, Waste management, Office of Solid Waste and Emer-
gency Response, Hazardous materials transportation.
0430 Obtaining a Soil and Debris Treatability Variance for
Removal Actions. Superfund LDR Guide No. 6B
Order Number PB91-921310CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 90
The Office of Emergency and Remedial Response (OERR)
issued a series of Superfund LDR Guides in July and Decem-
ber of 1989. Since the issuance of these guides, the Environ-
mental Protection Agency, with cooperation from outside par-
ties (e.g., environmental groups, industry representatives),
has conducted an analysis of the potential impacts associat-
ed with applying the LDR treatment standards to Superfund
and RCRA Corrective Action cleanups. As a result of these
analyses, it was decided that they Agency will promulgate a
third set of treatment standards (in addition to the
wastewater and nonwastewater categories currently in effect)
specifically for soil and debris wastes. In the interim, there is
the presumption that CERCLA response actions involving the
placement of soil and debris contaminated with RCRA re-
stricted wastes will utilize a Treatability Variance to comply
with the LDRs and that, under these variances, the treatment
levels outlined in Superfund LDR Guide 6B will serve as al-
ternative 'treatment standards' for removal action. The guide
has been prepared to outline the process for obtaining and
complying with a Treatability Variance for soil and debris that
are contaminated with RCRA hazardous wastes until such
time that the Agency promulgates treatment standards for
soil and debris.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $150 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $300). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 6p.
Subject index keywords: Debris, Superfund, Waste treat-
ment, Hazardous materials, Guidelines, Remedial action, Soil
contamination.
0431 Off-Site Policy: RFA or Equivalent Investigation
Requirement at RCRA Treatment and Storage Facilities
Order Number PB91-139295CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 4 Jan 88
The directive discusses the modification of RFA criterion
(need to have an RFA completed) for subtitle C treatment
and storage facilities. The requirements were phased in over
a period to end 6/1/88.
74
-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Compliance With
Other Laws
Specifications: 7p.
Subject index keywords: Waste management, Superfund,
Hazardous materials, Office of Solid Waste and Emerqencv
Response.
0432 Overview of Selected EPA (Environmental
Protection Agency) Regulations and Guidance Affecting
POTW (Publicly Owned Treatment Works) Management
Order Number PB90-129263CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
the Assistant Administrator for Water; Sep 89
The information in the document is meant only as a summary
of some of the regulations and guidance that may apply to
publicly owned treatment works (POTW) operations. The
document does not provide a comprehensive overview of all
applicable federal requirements. Use of the document should
not replace reference to official regulations as published in
the Federal Register or the Code of Federal Regulations or
to other more specific guidance documents. Also, the reader
should be aware that EPA continuously updates and revises
its regulations in response to statutory amendments or to im-
prove its regulatory program. Finally, POTWs are reminded
that the Clean Water Act allows states and municipalities to
impose more stringent requirements on National Pollutant
Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permittees than are
required under federal law. Therefore, EPA suggests that the
reader contact the appropriate authorities to get sources of
detailed guidance for specific situations.
Specifications: 31 p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Sewers, In-
dustrial wastes, Pollution regulations, Publicly owned treat-
ment works, Toxic substances.
0433 Overview of the Off-Site Policy for OSCs and RPMs
Order Number PB92-963603CDH, price: PC A01/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Oct 91
The fact sheet provides essential information for On Scene
Coordinators (OSCs) and Remedial Project Managers
(RPMs) for the implementation of the Off-site Policy. The fact
sheet includes an overview of the Policy, helpful reminders
and a list of the Regional Off-site contacts.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 2p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management
Hazardous materials, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
Response.
0434 PAST: The Potential ARARs Selection Tool
Order Number PB92-152941CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Computer Sciences Corp., Cincinnati, OH.; Environmental
Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk Reduction
Engineering Lab; 1992
The 1986 Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization Act
(SARA) specified that any remedial actions at Superfund
sites must comply with applicable or relevant and appropriate
regulations (ARARS), including Federal, state, and local envi-
ronmental statutes. Identifying these legal requirements for a
particular hazardous waste site can be a complex and time
consuming process. The EPA Risk Reduction Engineering
Research Laboratory is developing a prototype knowledge-
based system to aid in screening regulations that determine
clean-up requirements based on unique site characteristics.
The decision logic follows that presented in the EPA docu-
ments such as CERCLA Compliance with Other Laws Manu-
als (Part I and II). Hence, it takes into consideration the
chemicals at the site, the particular location features of the
site, and the proposed remediations methods.
Specifications: Pub. in HMCRI's Annual National Confer-
ence Proceedings (12th), Hazardous Materials Control/Su-
perfund '92, December 3-5, 1991, Washington, DC., p632-
636. See also PB90-272535 and PB90-148461. Sponsored
by Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk
Reduction Engineering Lab. 7p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Hazardous materials,
Pollution regulations, Waste management, Remedial action,
Expert systems, Applicable or Relevant and Appropriate
Regulations, PAST system.
0435 Permits and Permit 'Equivalency' Processes for
CERCLA On-Site Response Actions
Order Number PB93-963325CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 19 Feb 92
The directive is intended to clarify the EPA policy with re-
spect to attaining permits for activities at Comprehensive En-
vironmental Response Compensation and Liability Act
(CERCLA) sites.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 7p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
Hazardous materials, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
Response.
0436 Policy for Superfund Compliance with the RCRA
Land Disposal Restrictions
Order Number PB90-249640CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; 17 Apr 89
The directive assists the regional removal and remedial staff
in making current site decisions about the Land Disposal Re-
strictions (LDR). The memorandum explains: (1) how to de-
termine when LDRs are 'applicable' to a Superfund removal
or remedial action, and (2) the Superfund approach for com-
plying with the LDRs when they are determined to be appli-
cable.
Specifications: 12p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Sites, Waste
management, Superfund, Land application, Remedial action.
0437 Policy on Floodplains and Wetland Assessments for
CERCLA Actions
Order Number PB91-921329CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; 6 Aug 85
The directive discusses specific situations requiring prepara-
tion of a flood plains or wetlands assessment and the factors
to be considered in preparing such an assessment.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $150 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $300). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 15p.
75
-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Compliance With
Other Laws
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
Hazardous materials, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
Response.
0438 Summary of 'Notification of Out-of-State Shipments
of Superfund Site Wastes'
Order Number PB91-228197CDH, price: PC A01/MF Ap1
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; May 91
The Fact Sheet summarizes EPA's policy that prior to the
off-site shipment of Superfund wastes to an out-of-state
waste management facility, EPA Regional Personnel will pro-
vide notice to the receiving state's environmental officials.
Specifications: 3p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
Hazardous materials, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
Response.
0439 Superfund Guide to RCRA Management
Requirements for Mineral Processing Wastes
Order Number PB91-921318CDH, price: PC A01/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Jan 91
The report summarizes recent revisions to the 1980 mining
waste exclusion, explains the potential effects of these revi-
sions on waste management options for mineral processing
wastes, and provides a general framework for managing min-
eral processing wastes at CERCLA sites in accordance with
RCRA land disposal restrictions (LDRs) and the recently pro-
mulgated toxicity characteristics (TC) rule.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $150 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $300). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 5p.
Subject index keywords: Mining, Solid waste disposal, Re-
visions, Hazardous materials, Superfund, Mineral processing
wastes.
0440 Superfund LDR Guide No. 1: Overview of RCRA
Land Disposal Restrictions (LDRs)
Order Number PB90-274325CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Jul 89
The fact sheet summarizes the major components of the
LDR, outlines the types of restrictions imposed, and presents
the compliance options specified in the regulation.
Specifications: 7p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Guidelines,
Superfund, Waste management, Office of Solid Waste and
Emergency Response, Land disposal, Remedial action.
0441 Superfund LDR Guide No. 2: Complying with the
California List Restrictions under Land Disposal
Restrictions (LDRs)
Order Number PB90-274333CDH, price: PC A01/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Jul 89
The fact sheet defines the California list of wastes, summa-
rizes their respective restrictions, and discusses their poten-
tial to overlap with other LDR treatment standards.
Specifications: 5p.
Subject Index keywords: Hazardous materials, Guidelines,
Superfund, Waste management, Office of Solid Waste and
Emergency Response, Land disposal, Remedial action.
0442 Superfund LDR Guide No. 3: Treatment Standards
and Minimum Technology Requirements under Land
Disposal Restrictions (LDRS)
Order Number PB90-274341CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Jul 89
The fact sheet summarizes the types and effective dates of
treatment standards, and outlines procedures for compliance
with the treatment standards and minimum technology re-
quirements set during national capacity extensions.
Specifications: 7p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Guidelines,
Waste treatment, Superfund, Office of Solid Waste and
Emergency Response, Land disposal, Waste management.
0443 Superfund LDR Guide No. 4: Complying with the
Hammer Restrictions under Land Disposal Restrictions
(LDRs)
Order Number PB90-274358CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection,Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Jul 89
The fact sheet discusses compliance with Land Disposal Re-
striction soft hammer and hard hammer provisions, which are
restrictions on the disposal of hazardous wastes if EPA does
not promulgate standards by relevant statutory deadlines.
Specifications: 7p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Guidelines,
Superfund, Waste management, Office of Solid Waste and
Emergency Response, Remedial action, Land disposal.
0444 Superfund LDR Guide No. 5: Determining When
Land Disposal Restrictions (LDRs) Are 'Applicable' to
CERCLA Response Actions
Order Number PB90-274366CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Jul 89
The fact sheet outlines the process used to determine
whether the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act
(RCRA) LDRs established under the Hazardous Waste and
Solid Waste Amendments are 'applicable' to CERCLA re-
sponse actions.
Specifications: 7p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Guidelines,
Superfund, Waste management, Office of Solid Waste and
Emergency Response, Remedial response, Land disposal.
0445 Superfund LDR Guide No. 6A (2nd Edition)
Obtaining a Soil and Debris Treatability Variance for
Remedial Actions
Order Number PB91-921327CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 90
The fact sheet outlines the process for obtaining and com-
plying with a Treatability Variance for soil and debris that are
contaminated with RCRA hazardous wastes until such time
that the Agency promulgates treatment standards for soil
and debris. In the interim before the Agency promulgates a
third set of treatment standards specifically for soil and
debris wastes, there is the presumption that CERCLA re-
sponse actions involving the placement of soil and debris
contaminated with RCRA restricted wastes will utilize a
Treatability Variance to comply with the LDRs. Treatment
76
-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Community
Relations, State & Local, Tag Grants
levels outlined in the fact sheet will serve as alternative
'treatment standards'.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $150 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $300). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 7p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management
Remedial action, Waste treatment, Soil treatment, Hazardous
materials, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response
Treatability variance.
0446 Superfund LDR Guide No. 7. Determining When
Land Disposal Restrictions (LDRs) Are Relevant and
Appropriate to CERCLA Response Actions
Order Number PB91-214122CDH, price: PC A01/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Dec 89
The Fact Sheet outlines the process used to determine
whether the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act
(RCRA) land disposal restrictions (LDRs) established under
the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) are
'relevant and appropriate' to an on-site CERCLA response
action.
Specifications: See also PB91-921327. 4p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management
Hazardous materials, Office of Solid Waste and Emerqencv
Response.
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION:
Community Relations, State & Local,
Tag Grants
0447 Analysis of State Superfund Programs: 50-State
Study
Order Number PB90-272733CDH, price: PC A10/MF A02
Environmental Law Inst, Washington, DC.; Environmental
Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of Emergency
and Remedial Response; Sep 89
The report examines site cleanup capabilities in all 50 States
and provides descriptions of statutes, program organization,
findings, and cleanup procedures. Also provides snapshots
of state cleanup programs.
Specifications: Sponsored by Environmental Protection
Agency, Washington, DC. Office of Emergency and Remedial
Response. 225p.
Subject index keywords: States(United States), Hazardous
materials, Waste disposal, Superfund.
0448 Analysis of State Superfund Programs: 50-State
Study, 1990 Update
Order Number PB91-921259CDH, price: PC A11/MF A02
Environmental Law Inst, Washington, DC.; Environmental
Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of Emergency
and Remedial Response; Sep 90
Updates a study initially conducted in 1989 by the Environ-
mental Law Institute for OERR. The study examines site
cleanup capabilities in all 50 States and provides descrip-
tions of statutes, program organization, funding and cleanup
procedures. This revised version also contains an analysis of
political subdivision involvement in the cleanup process. The
report provides detailed information for each State in a 'State
Summaries' chapter and in 50-State tables that facilitate
comparisons between States.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. See also PB90-272733. Sponsored
by Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office
of Emergency and Remedial Response. 226p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, State programs, Re-
medial action, Hazardous materials, Waste management, Re-
medial response, US EPA Regions 1-10.
0449 Analysis of State Superfund Programs: 50-State
Study. 1991 Update
Order Number PB92-963418CDH, price: PC A12/MF A03
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Dec 91
Under the Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization Act
(SARA) of 1986, Congress requires the EPA to involve
States in the Superfund program in a 'substantial and mean-
ingful' way. The State and Local Coordination Branch (SLCB)
is responsible for developing regulations, guidance, and
policy related to this Congressional mandate. As part of its
responsibilities, the SLCB tries to maintain comprehensive in-
formation about State capabilities to contribute to or manage
cleanups at hazardous waste sites. Under a cooperative
agreement with EPA, the Environmental Law Institute has
collected, organized, and summarized the information pre-
sented here on State cleanup programs.
Specifications: Paper Copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. See also PB91-921259 and PB90-
272733. 267p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, State programs,
Waste management, Hazardous materials.
0450 Authority to Use CERCLA to Provide Enforcement
Funding Assistance to States
Order Number PB91-138909CDH, price: PC A01/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 12 Feb 86
The directive transmits February 13, 1986, Office of General
Counsel opinion to EPA Regional offices, authorizing
CERCLA funding of State negotiation and litigation activities
at NPL sites. See also directive no. 9831.3 'EPA State Rela-
tionship.'
Specifications: See also PB91-138891 and PB91-138917
5p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
Hazardous materials, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
Response.
0451 CERCLA Community Relations Mailing Lists
Order Number PB91-139527CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 6 Feb 89
The directive emphasizes the importance of using community
relations mailing lists to ensure the notification of potentially
responsible parties.
Specifications: 6p.
77
-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Community Relations,
State & Local, Tag Grants
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
Hazardous materials, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
Response.
0452 Citizen's Guide to Air Sparging
Order Number PB92-235597CDH, price: PC A01/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Mar 92
The Fact Sheet contains a description of air sparging; how it
works; why use this treatment method; will it always work;
where air sparging is being used; and how to get more infor-
mation on this treatment.
Specifications: 5p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Hazardous materials,
Waste management, Innovative treatment technologies, Air
sparging, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response.
0453 Citizen's Guide to Bioventing
Order Number PB92-235571CDH, price: PC A01/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Mar 92
The Fact Sheet contains a description of bioventing; what it
is; how it works; why this type of treatment should be used;
will bioventing work on the site; where it is being selected;
and how to get more information on the subject.
Specifications: 5p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Hazardous materials,
Waste management, Innovative treatment technologies, Soil
venting, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response.
0454 Citizen's Guide to Glycolate Dehalogenation
Order Number PB92-233105CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Mar 92
Glycolate dehalogenation is the process of using a chemical
reagent (a glycol in this case) to remove halogen from con-
taminants, consequently rendering them less hazardous. A
chemical reagent is a substance used to react with and
change another substance. This dehalogenation process can
be used on halogenated contaminants such as PCBs and
dioxins that may be found in soil and oils.
Specifications: 6p.
Subject index keywords: Glycols, Dehalogenation, Hazard-
ous materials.
0455 Citizen's Guide to How Innovative Treatment
Technologies Are Being Successfully Applied at
Superfund Sites
Order Number PB92-233071CDH, price: PC A01/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Mar 92
Treatment technologies are processes applied to the treat-
ment of hazardous waste or contaminated materias, such as
soils, sludges, sediments and debris, to permanently alter
their condition through chemical, biological, or physical
means. They are used as an alternative to merely containing
the hazardous substances on site or in a hazardous waste
landfill that is designed and operated under the Federal Re-
source Conservation Recovery Act (RCRA) regulations.
Today, treatment technologies are being tailored to deal with
specific hazardous wastes.
Specifications: 5p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste treat-
ment.
0456 Citizen's Guide to In situ Soil Flushing
Order Number PB92-233113CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Mar 92
The Fact Sheet contains a description of what in situ soil
flushing is; how it works; why consider in situ soil flushing;
will soil flushing work at the site; where is it being selected;
and how to obtain more information.
Specifications: 6p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Hazardous materials,
Waste management, Innovative treatment technologies,
Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response, Soil flush-
ing.
0457 Citizen's Guide to Innovative Treatment
Technologies for Contaminated Soils, Sludges,
Sediments and Debris
Order Number PB92-235563CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Mar 92
The Fact Sheet contains-, what innovative treatment technol-
ogies are; why they are used; the different types; how the
treatment technologies are selected and which are used;
what happens of a technology does not work; where innova-
tive treatment technologies are being selected; why EPA is
encouraging the use of these treatments; and how more in-
formation can be obtained.
Specifications: 6p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
Hazardous materials, Innovative treatment technologies,
Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response.
0458 Citizen's Guide to Soil Washing
Order Number PB92-233097CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Mar 92
Soil washing is a technology that uses liquids (sometimes
combined with chemical additives) and a mechanical process
to scrub soils. The scrubbing removes hazardous contami-
nants and concentrates them into smaller volume. After the
soil washing process is completed, the smaller volume of
soil, which contains the majority of the fine silt and clay parti-
cles, can be further treated by other methods (such as incin-
eration or bioremediation) or disposed of according to State
and Federal regulations.
Specifications: 6p.
Subject index keywords: Washing, Soil, Hazardous materi-
als.
0459 Citizen's Guide to Solvent Extraction
Order Number PB92-233089CDH, price: PC A01 /MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Mar 92
Solvent extraction is a treatment technology that uses a sol-
vent (a fluid that can dissolve another substance) to sepa-
rate or remove hazardous organic contaminants from
sludges, sediments, or soil. Solvent extraction does not de-
stroy contaminants. It concentrates them so they can be re-
cycled or destroyed. II: is used in combination with other
technologies to destroy the separated concentrated contami-
nants. When the soil enters an extractor (a tank where the
contaminated soil is mixed with the solvent), the soil is sepa-
rated into three components, or fractions: solvent with dis-
78
-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Community
Relations, State & Local, Tag Grants
solved contaminants, solids, and water. Contaminants are
concentrated into each of these fractions. For example,
PCBs (polychlorinated biphenyls) concentrate in the contami-
nated solvent mixture, while metals are left behind in the
solids and water.
Specifications: 5p.
Subject index keywords: Extraction, Solvents, Hazardous
materials, Waste treatment.
0460 Citizen's Guide to Thermal Desorption
Order Number PB92-232396CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Mar 92
Thermal desorption is an innovative treatment technology
that treats soils contaminated with hazardous wastes by
heating the soil at realtively low temperatures (200-1000 deg
F) so that contaminants with low boiling points will vaporize
(turn into gas) and, consequently, separate from the soil.
There are three steps in thermal desorption: (1) heating the
soil to vaporize the contaminants; (2) treating the vaporized
contaminants; and (3) testing the treated soil.
Specifications: 6p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Soils, Waste
treatment.
0461 Citizen's Guide to Using Indigenous and Exogenous
Microorganisms in Bioremediation
Order Number PB92-235589CDH, price: PC A01/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Mar 92
The Fact Sheet contains a description of bioremediation;
what indigenous and exogenous microorganisms are; how
these microorganisms are used; what sites can use these
microorganisms; and how to obtain more information.
Specifications: 5p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Hazardous materials,
Waste management, Innovative treatment technologies,
Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response, Indigenous
microorganisms.
0462 Citizens' Guidance Manual for the Technical
Assistance Grant Program
Order Number PB91-238733CDH, price: PC A14/MF A03
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Jun 88
The manual is designed to help citizens' groups apply for
and manage a technical assistance grant. It is written as a
self-help guide in an easy-to-understand manner. Step-by-
step instructions for completing various forms are included
throughout the manual. In addition, copies of blank forms
have been included for easy reference.
Specifications: 325p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Hazardous materials,
Waste management, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
Response, Technical Assistance Grant Program.
0463 Citizens' Guidance Manual for the Technical
Assistance Grant Program
Order Number PB92-101435CDH, price: PC A14/MF A03
ICF Technology, Inc., Fairfax, VA:; Environmental Protection
Agency, Washington, DC. Office of Emergency and Remedial
Response; Jun 88
The Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization Act of
1986 (SARA), which amended CERCLA, provides under sec-
tion 117(e) an important new component of EPA's communi-
ty relations activities at Superfund sites-technical assistance
grants to affected groups. The purpose of these grants is to
assist citizens' groups in understanding technical information
that assesses potential hazards and the selection and design
of appropriate response actions at Superfund sites. This
manual outlines Federal policies, procedures, and regulations
related to the Technical Assistance Grant Program and pro-
vides instructions on how to complete Federal grant forms. If
a State administers the Technical Assistance Grant Program,
the State may have additional procedures and requirements
that affect citizens' groups applying for grants within that
State. Groups, therefore, should contact the appropriate
State representative for specific information. This manual is
designed to help citizens' groups apply for and manage a
technical assistance grant. It is written as a self-help guide in
an easy-to-understand manner. Step-by-step instructions for
completing various forms are included throughout the
manual.
Specifications: Sponsored by Environmental Protection
Agency, Washington, DC. Office of Emergency and Remedial
Response. 320p.
Subject index keywords: Citizen participation, Technical as-
sistance, Manuals, Superfund, Hazardous materials, Waste
management, Technical Assistance Grant Program.
0464 Communicating with the Public About Hazardous
Materials: An Examination of Local Practice. Risk
Communication Series
Order Number PB90-235938CDH, price: PC A06/MF A01
Virginia Polytechnic Inst. and State Univ., Blacksburg. Center
for Environmental and Hazardous Material Studies.;
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC, Office of
Policy, Planning and Evaluation; Apr 90
The study's purpose is to improve the ability of public and
private sector organizations to communicate with members
of the general public about the risks posed by hazardous ma-
terials, such as those found in Superfund or RCRA sites, or
subject to SARA Title III. The second phase included a na-
tional survey of Local Emergency Planning Committees
(LEPCs) and case studies of selected risk communication ef-
forts. The survey, conducted in a sample of ten states, was
designed to assess the risk communication efforts of LEPCs
and to gauge their capacity for promoting risk communication
in their communities. Case studies in three communities pro-
vide examples of risk communication efforts, with secondary
case studies in neighboring areas. The purpose was to (earn
what risk communication techniques had been tried in these
cases, to secure suggestions for risk communication pro-
grams from practitioners, and to assess the level of hazard-
ous materials awareness among a sample of the attentive
public in each community.
Specifications: See also PB90-231200. Sponsored by Envi-
ronmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Policy, Planning and Evaluation. 118p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Risk, Emer-
gencies, Environmental exposure, Public education.
79
-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Community Relations,
State & Local, Tag Grants
0465 Community Relations during Enforcement Activities
and Development of the Administrative Record
Order Number PB91-139519CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; 3 Nov 88
The report discusses enforcement community relations. The
directive, which is Chapter VI of 'Community Relations in Su-
perfund: A Handbook,' discusses developing community rela-
tions plans, the relationship between the administrative
record for response selection and community relations, and
community relations during specific enforcement actions and
settlements.
Specifications: Final version of Chapter 6 for Community
Relations in Superfund: A Handbook. 31 p.
Subject Index keywords: Community relations, Hazardous
materials, Superfund program.
0466 Community Relations during Enforcement Activities
and Development of the Administrative Record
Order Number PB92-105469CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 3 Nov 88
The directive discusses enforcement community relations.
The directive, which is Chapter VI of 'Community Relations in
Superfund: A Handbook,' discusses developing community
relations plans, the relationship between the administrative
record for response selection and community relations, and
community relations during specific enforcement actions and
settlements. The document supersedes directive number
9836.0 'Interim Guidance on Community Relations in En-
forcement,' dated March 22, 1985, and directive number
9836.0-1 a 'Community Relations Activities at Superfund En-
forcement Sites,' dated August 8, 1985.
Specifications: 28p.
Subject Index keywords: Waste management, Superfund,
Hazardous materials, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
Response.
0467 Community Relations In Superfund: A Handbook
Order Number PB92-963341CDH, price: PC A12/MF A03
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Jan 92
The Superfund community relations program promotes two-
way communication between members of the public, includ-
ing potentially responsible parties (PRPs), and the lead gov-
ernment agency in charge of response actions. The commu-
nity relations activities discussed in this Handbook provide
the opportunity for interested persons to comment on, and
provide input to, decisions about response actions. This
Handbook offers policy and guidance on planning and con-
ducting Superfund community relations programs. It empha-
sizes proven approaches and activities derived from years of
experience in conducting community relations in Superfund.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. Supersedes PB89-180830. 268p.
Subject Index keywords: Superfund, Community relations,
Waste management, Hazardous materials, Handbooks, Re-
medial response, Cleanup operations.
0468 Counting State-Lead Enforcement NPL Sites Toward
the CERCLA Section 116(e) Remedial Action Start
Mandate
Order Number PB91-138933CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; 21 Oct 88
The directive outlines the criteria and procedures for count-
ing State-lead enforcement National Priorities List sites
toward the CERCLA section 116(e) remedial action start
mandate. The guidance supplements directive no. 9355.0-24
'OSWER Strategy for Management Oversight of the CERCLA
RA Start Mandate,' dated December 28, 1987.
Specifications: See also PB91-138925. 7p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
Hazardous materials, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
Response.
0469 Criminal Investigations and the Superfund Program
Order Number PB90-274499CDH, price: PC A01/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 90
The fact sheet, directed toward any one who witnesses
fraudulent activity in EPA programs, discusses areas in which
fraud and abuse can occur and provides an understanding of
the criminal investigation process that results from reports of
suspicious activity.
Specifications: 5p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Criminal in-
vestigations, Superfund, Waste management, Office of Solid
Waste and Emergency Response, Pollution regulations,
Fraud.
0470 Debarment and Suspension
Order Number PB92-963331CDH, price: PC A01/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Oct 91
The report defines debarment and suspension, and de-
scribes causes and procedures and authorities for pursuing
them. Also the study includes requirements of the Drug-Free
Work Place Act.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. Supersedes PB90-272527. 4p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Federal law,
Funds, Pollution control, Superfund, Drug Free Work Place
Act.
0471 Enhancing State Superfund Capabilities: Nine-State
Study
Order Number PB91-242362CDH, price: PC A12/MF A03
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response.; Environmental Law
Inst., Washington, DC; Dec 90
Nine (9) state hazardous substance cleanup programs were
studied in depth in 1989 to determine what elements of fund-
ing, enforcement, program organization and other factors are
important to state capabilities. Those studied were Colorado,
Illinois, Minnesota, New Hampshire, New Jersey, North Caro-
lina, Oregon, Pennsylvania, and Texas. The states were se-
lected to provide a cross-section of large and small pro-
grams, new and older programs, geographic diversity, and
special program features. The findings of the study, prepared
80
-------
Envi™me,ntal Law Institute for the Office of Policy
Part On9ea,nv tHValUati°nh(OPPE)' are reP°rted in **> P^s
Part One synthesizes the results across states and draws
conclusions concerning means of enhancing programs Part
±r*ePTSt°n 6aCh °f the States studiedlnd shows how
program features combine in the context of operating pro-
ffwTnS3 w"SK P^Paod in cooPeration with Environmental
Law Inst, Washington, DC. 259p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Hazardous materials
Waste management, State programs, Cleanup operations
^SuDerfTd1'^ !herAdeqUaCy °f Cost Share Provisions in
auperfund State Contracts
Order Number PB93-963336CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
SMH w"1?*31 Pr°tection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 29 Mar 93
™Lmemora"durn revests regional offices to re-examine
t±r9, Supterfund State Contracts (SSCs) for Fund-financed
remedial actions to verify that they adequately reflect in
curred and projected remedial action costs
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 US., Canada
Daoe^on°: a" 0tnTl$400)- Sin9|e c°Pies a'so available in'
paper copy or microfiche. 1 1p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Hazardous materials
Waste disposal, Contract management.
0473 Final Guidance on Administrative Records for
Selecting CERCLA Response Actions
Order Number PB91-139121CDH, price: PC A06/MF A01
I^un,metntal Pr°tection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 3 Dec 90
The directive sets forth the policy and procedures governinq
he compilation and establishment of administrativf reco ds
for selecting (response actions under CERCLA, as amended
by SARA. The directive supersedes no. 9833 3A 'Interim
?PRnCAep°n Administr3«ve Records for Selection Tf
CERCLA Response Actions' dated May 29, 1987.
f tWS d°CUmen* are not fullv
Resonse
Superfund, Waste management,
Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
Funding of State Enforcement Related Activities
Order Number PB91-138891CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste and Emergency Response; 23 Jan 85
QHnrvJ8^-*^110"11098 that funding can be Provided to
support a limited number of enforcement related activities
based on the July 20, 1985, Office of General Counsel opin-
SE'to c « directive no- 9831.3a, 'CERCLA Funding of
rSS, EnforHcetmf "* Activities at NPL Sites - Interim Draft
Guidance,' dated October 1, 1986.
Specifications: See also PB91 -138909 7p
H±riCL'nS±r°Dr±LlTen:und' W?ste management,
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Community
Relations, State & Local, Tag Grants
0475 Guidance on Site Assessment Cooperative
Agreements
Order Number PB92-224385CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Aug 91
The guidance on site assessment cooperative agreement
presents generic SMOA language pertaining to Site Assess-
ment activities, a generic quarterly report format, and generic
site assessment cooperative agreement application package
In addition, the appendices provide additional sample sched-
ules, forms, and letters for developing a site assessment co-
operative agreement.
Specifications: 40p.
tDAJe?A,indeX keywords: s'te surveys, State programs, US
EPA, Waste management, Superfund, Cooperative agree-
ments.
0476 Guide to Community Involvement for Site
Assessment Managers
Order Number PB93-963348CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
bolid Waste and Emergency Response; Sep 93
The report includes information on community involvement
initiatives that can be taken during the technical phases of
site assessment and instructions on how to take these ac-
tions for hazardous wastes.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S. Canada
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 8p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Community
relations, Sites, Pollution control.
0477 Interim Final Guidance Package on Funding
CERCLA State Enforcement Actions at NPL Sites
Order Number PB91-138917CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
or!!0.",1716"'3' Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
bolid Waste and Emergency Response; 7 Apr 88
The directive outlines requirements, conditions, and limita-
tions for State funding under a CERCLA cooperative agree-
ment of CERCLA enforcement actions at National Priorities
o!foHSL guidance is divided into four subcomponents-
a«t f f' .^'o3^ d' Tne directive supersedes directive no.
9831.1-1a CERCLA Funding of State Oversight of Potentially
Responsible Parties (PRPs),' dated October 1, 1986, and di-
ToT; "?-• 9831'3 dated Oct°ber 1, 1986 'CERCLA Funding
of State Enforcement Activities at NPL Sites,' - Interim Draft
Guidance.
Specifications: See also PB91-138909 and PB91 -138925.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management
Hazardous materials, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
Response. J
0478 Obligation of Funds under Superfund State
Contracts
Order Number PB93-963326CDH, price: PC A01/MF A01
I"r^0,",™6"*3' Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
bolid Waste and Emergency Response; 5 Aug 93
The memorandum clarifies EPA's interpretation of 40 CFR
Hart 35, Subpart O, regarding the relationship between cost
share assurances in Superfund State Contracts (SSCs) and
the obligation of remedial action funds. EPA's policy is that
81
-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Community Relations,
State & Local, Tag Grants
remedial design monies may be obligated to another Federal
agency to initiate the procurement process for a remedial
action contract before an SSC is executed. However, the
memorandum also reiterates Agency policy that an SSC
must be in place before funds may be obligated for initiating
or continuing remedial action.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 4p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Contract management,
State government.
0479 Political Subdivision Involvement in Superfund
Order Number PB90-273954CDH, price: PC A01/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Apr 90
The fact sheet provides guidance to Regions, States and po-
litical subdivisions on the designation of a political subdivi-
sion as the lead agency for remedial response under
CERCLA.
Specifications: 4p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Superfund,
Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response, Waste
management, Remedial response.
0480 Political Subdivision Involvement in Superfund
Order Number PB92-963330CDH, price: PC A01/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Oct 91
The Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensa-
tion, and Liability Act (CERCLA), as amended, allows EPA to
provide funds to States, political subdivisions thereof, and
federally recognized Indian Tribes for Superfund response.
The definition of political subdivision varies from State to
State, since each State determines what units of government
meet its legislative definition. A political subdivision can par-
ticipate in Superfund cleanup as a lead or support agency
when EPA and the State agree that this enhances the clean-
up process and results in an efficient, economical, and well-
coordinated use of resources. To determine this, EPA and
the State assess the political subdivision's prior involvement
and agree that: The political subdivision is able to conduct
the response activities; It is economical and advantageous to
designate the political subdivision as lead; and The political
subdivision has the authority to enter into a Cooperative
Agreement with the Federal Government and to administer
Federal dollars.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. Supersedes PB90-273954. 3p.
Subject Index keywords: Funds, Hazardous materials, Pol-
lution control, Law(Jurisprudence), Superfund, Cleanup, Com-
prehensive Environmental Response Compensation and Li-
ability Act.
0481 Public Awareness Signs at Superfund Sites
Order Number PB91-921306CDH, price: PC A01/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Oct 90
The Fact Sheet is designed to inform individuals involved in
the Superfund program about the need to post signs at every
Superfund site. Superfund sites have been and will continue
to be of interest and concern to people in surrounding com-
munities and to the public in general. Through the posting of
signs at each site,,the Superfund program can work to pro-
mote continued interaction with communities as well as
assure that interested parties .can access information or
report unusual or criminal activities.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $150 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $300). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 2p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
Hazardous materials, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
Response, Signs.
0482 Questions and Answers About the State Role in
Remedy Selection at Non-Fund-Financed Enforcement
Sites
Order Number PB91-187039CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 18 Apr 91
The directive describes circumstances under which States
may select and implement a remedy at NPL sites without
first obtaining EPA concurrence.
Specifications: 7p.
Subject index keywords: Waste management, Superfund,
Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response.
0483 Reporting and Exchange of Information on State
Enforcement Actions at National Priorities List Sites
Order Number PB91-138883CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 14 Mar 86
The directive outlines need for EPA Headquarters reporting
and exchange of information on State-lead enforcement sites
in order to facilitate Federal oversight and review of State ac-
tions The memorandum has two attachments: (1) results of
a survey.on current State-lead enforcement data on EPA
systems, and (2) a list of additional data requirements that
should be addressed.
Specifications: See also PB91 -138891. 18p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
Hazardous materials, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
Response.
0484 Revised Interim Final Guidance on Indian
Involvement in the Superfund Program
Order Number PB90-249723CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; 28 Nov 89
The directive supplements and references existing documen-
tation for EPA Regional personnel and highlights issues spe-
cific to the involvement of federally recognized Indian tribes
in the Superfund program.
Specifications: 17p.
Subject index keywords: Regulations, Superfund, Remedial
action, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response,
American Indians.
82
-------
r°'e °f 9ommunity Interviews in the Development
"" Relations Pr°9ram for Remedial
of
Order Number PB90-273756CDH, price: PC A01/MF
Env,ronmental Protection Agency,' Washington
Emergency and Remedial Response; 1 5 Jun 90
The directive offers guidance in response to recent Reaional
SSedTv ZVT^ the c^^nity relations inteEj
required by the National Contingency Plan
Specifications: 5p
°4
Desk Refere"ce for Municipalities
*
The manual is a compilation of existing documents relatina
to municipalities and Superfund. The manual's pumose is to
assist municipalities who have been or might be EtifTed as
SSSS& resp°nsit?le P,arties
-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Community Relations,
State & Local, Tag Grants
Subject index keywords: Waste disposal, Hazardous mate-
rials, Site selection, Site surveys, Superfund.
0492 Superfund Fact Sheet: PCBs
Order Number PB93-963309CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Sep 92
The fact sheet describes polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs),
where PCBs can be found and how they can enter the body
and affect human health. The fact sheet is one in a series
providing reference information about Superfund issues and
is intended for readers with no formal scientific training.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 6p.
Subject Index keywords: Environmental exposure, Hazard-
ous materials, Polychlorinated biphenyls, Superfund.
0493 Superfund Fact Sheet: Public Involvement
Order Number PB93-963313CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Sep 92
The fact sheet describes how citizens can participate in the
decision-making process regarding Superfund activities in
their communities. Explanations of how citizens can report
potential Superfund sites, address public health hazards from
both the site itself and cleanup activities, and provide input
to limit the effects of the cleanup on their communities are
given. The fact sheet is one in a series providing reference
information about Superfund issues and is intended for read-
ers with no formal scientific training.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 6p.
Subject index keywords: Waste disposal, Hazardous mate-
rials, Citizen participation, Superfund.
0494 Superfund Fact Sheet: The Remedial Program
Order Number PB93-963315CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Sep 92
The fact sheet describes what various actions the EPA can
take to clean up hazardous wastes sites. Explanations of
how the criteria for environmental and public health risk as-
sessment are determined and the role of state and local gov-
ernments in site remediation are given. The fact sheet is one
in a series providing reference information about Superfund
issues and is intended for readers with no formal scientific
training.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 6p.
Subject index keywords: Waste disposal, Hazardous mate-
rials, Superfund.
0495 Superfund Fact Sheet: The Removal Program
Order Number PB93-963310CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Sep 92
The fact sheet describes the Superfund Emergency Re-
sponse Program, a program specifically designed to respond
to multi-media hazardous materials accidents (e.g. illegal dis-
posal or improper handling of materials, transportation acci-
dents, chemical fires) that endanger people and/or the envi-
ronment. Explanations of how the removal program works
and how the affected communities are involved are given.
The fact sheet is one in a series providing reference informa-
tion about Superfund issues and is intended for readers with
no scientific training.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 6p.
Subject index keywords: Waste disposal, Hazardous mate-
rials, Pollution control, Superfund.
0496 Superfund Fact Sheet: Trichloroethylene
Order Number PB93-963307CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Sep 92
The fact sheet describes trichloroethylene (TCE), a chemical
that can be found in a variety of products, including some
glues, paints and paint removers, and spot removers and
cleaners. Explanations of how TCE can get into the body
and how it can affect human health are given. The fact sheet
is one in a series providing reference information about Su-
perfund issues and is intended for readers with no formal sci-
entific training.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 6p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Environmen-
tal exposure, Ethylene/trichloro, Superfund.
0497 Superfund Information Repositories and
Administrative Records: Introduction for Librarians
Order Number PB92-963621CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Aug 92
The fact sheet discusses two features of EPA's Superfund
Community Relations Program: the information repository
and the administrative record. The fact sheet describes the
types of information usually contained in the information re-
pository and administrative record and describes what is in-
volved in acting as an information repository librarian.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 8p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Information
centers, Records management, Superfund, Repositories.
0498 Superfund: Qualified Disadvantaged Business
Utilization in State Response
Order Number PB92-963283CDH, price: PC A01 /MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Apr 92
The fact sheet concentrates on Disadvantaged Business En-
terprise utilization in cases where States are managing the
cleanup of National Priority List sites. It introduces the Super-
fund process, focuses on disadvantaged business enterprise
participation and involvement in state Superfund programs,
84
-------
provides a regulatory context for contracting practices, and
offers additional information sources.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U S Canada
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 5p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste manaqement
Hazardous materials, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
Hesponse.
0499 Superfund Technical Assistance Grant (TAG)
Handbook
Order Number PB91-238592CDH, price: PC A12/MF A03
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Apr 90
The handbook is designed to guide the reader through the
nlv nn fifth" Atsfistance Grant (TAG) Program, from ap-
plying for the grant to selecting a technical advisor and man-
aging a TAG project. The handbook explains federal policies
procedures, and regulations related to the TAG Program and
provides detailed instructions on how to complete necessary
grant forms. The handbook is intended for those who have
already submitted a Letter of Intent.
Specifications: 268p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management
Hazardous materials, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
Response, Technical Assistance Grant Program.
0500 Superfund Technical Assistance Grant (TAG)
Handbook: Applying for Your Grant
Order Number PB93-963352CDH, price:
l"li"?«mental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
bolid Waste and Emergency Response; Sep 93
fTmriJ£ChniCllASSiStance Grant (TAG> Pr°9ram Provi'des
funds for qualified citizens' groups affected by a Superfund
site to hire independent technical advisors to help interpret
and comment on site-related information. The booklet ex-
plains the basic program requirements that your group must
meet to be eligible for a TAG and to successfully complete a
LnGlQa-PPllcati°n- The TAG Program is governed by certain
regulations, which are paraphrased throughout the booklet.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S Canada
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. See also PB93-963353. 24p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Financial assistance,
Information dissemination.
0501 Superfund Technical Assistance Grant (TAG)
Handbook: The Application Forms with Instructions
Order Number PB93-963353CDH, price:
I^A/metntal Pr°tection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
bolid Waste and Emergency Response; Sep 93
Contents: Sample Application Forms with Instructions; Letter
of Intent; Standard Form 424 - General Information; Stand-
ard Form 424A - Budget Information; Standard Form 424B -
Assurances; Project Narrative Statement; Certification Re-
garding Debarment; Drug Free Workplace Certification; Certi-
fication Regarding Lobbying; Attachments; Attachment 1.A. -
Statement of Work; Attachment 1.B. - Proposed Schedule of
Tasks and Costs for Technical Advisors; and Attachment
1 .C. - Detailed Budget.
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Community
Relations, State & Local, Tag Grants
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. See also PB93-963352. 11 Op.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Financial assistance,
Information dissemination.
0502 Superfund Technical Assistance Grants
Order Number PB90-273772CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Jan 90
The fact sheet provides background and basic information
on the Technical Assistance Grant (TAG) program, which
provides funds for qualified citizen's groups to hire independ-
ent technical advisors to help them understand and com-
ment on technical factors in cleanup decisions affectina
them at nearby sites.
Specifications: See also PB90-194721. 9p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Superfund
Technical Assistance Grant Program, Waste management!
Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response, Remedial
action.
0503 Superfund Technical Assistance Grants (Fact Sheet)
Order Number PB93-963301 CDH, price:
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Sep 93
An important aspect of the Superfund program is citizen in-
volvement at the local level in decision making that relates to
site-specific cleanup actions. Recognizing the importance of
community involvement and the need for citizens living near
NPL sites to be well informed, Congress included provisions
in SARA to establish a Technical Assistance Grant (TAG)
Program, intended to promote public involvement in deci-
sions on site-specific cleanup strategies under Superfund.
The TAG Program provides funds for qualified citizens'
groups affected by a Superfund site to hire independent
technical advisors to help them understand and comment on
site-related information, and thus participate in cleanup deci-
sions.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 6p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management
Remedial action, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Re-
sponse, Technical Assistance Grant Program.
0504 Superfund Technical Assistance Grants Program-
Regional Guidance Manual
Order Number PB90-194721 CDH, price: PC A05/MF A01
IGF, Inc., Fairfax, VA.; Environmental Protection Agency
Washington, DC. Office of Emergency and Remedial
Response; Jul 88
Section 117(e) of the Comprehensive Environmental Re-
sponse, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980 (CERCLA),
as amended, states that technical assistance grants can be
made to 'any group of individuals which may be affected by
a release or threatened release at any facility which is listed
on the National Priorities List (NPL)' Affected groups eligible
for technical assistance grants are those that can demon-
strate, among other things, that their members face actual or
potential health, economic, or environmental threats arising
85
-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Enforcement
from a release or threatened release at a facility listed on the
NPL or proposed for listing where a response action is un-
derway. CERCLA, as amended, authorizes a maximum tech-
nical assistance grant of up to $50,000 per site for the dura-
tion of site response activities. Citizens' groups are required
to provide matching funds. Only one grant may be awarded
for any eligible NPL site. If more than one group intends to
apply for the available grant at a site, the groups should be
encouraged to consolidate and submit one application.
Grants will be used for the purpose of obtaining technical as-
sistance to interpret information related to Superfund re-
sponse activities at a site.
Specifications: Also pub. as OSWER DIRECTIVE-9230.1-
04. Sponsored by Environmental Protection Agency, Wash-
ington, DC. Office of Emergency and Remedial Response.
94p.
Subject index keywords: Pollution control, Hazardous ma-
terials, Grants, Superfund program.
0505 Superfund Technical Assistance Grants (TAGs)
(Pamphlet)
Order Number PB93-963302CDH, price:
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Sep 93
The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) believes it is im-
portant for communities to be involved in decisions related to
nearby Superfund sites. For this reason, community outreach
activities are underway at each of the 1,200 sites on the Na-
tional Priorities List (NPL). Congress established the Techni-
cal Assistance Grant (TAG) Program in 1986 to help affected
communities understand and comment on site-related infor-
mation, and thus participate in cleanup decisions.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 8p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
Remedial action, Technical Assistance Grant Program.
0506 Supporting State Attorneys General CERCLA
Remedial and Enforcement Activities at NPL Sites
Order Number PB91-138925CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 21 Jun 88
The directive reaffirms role of State-lead agency for award of
cooperative agreements, and states that funds can none-the-
less be available to State attorneys general via pass through
from the lead agency. Describes the three types of coopera-
tive agreements that can be passed through the State-lead
agency to the State Attorney General. The guidance supple-
ments directives no. 9831.6a-6d 'Interim Final Guidance
Package on Funding CERCLA State Enforcement Actions at
NPL Sites,' dated April 7, 1988.
Specifications: See also PB91-138933 and PB91-138917.
10p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
Hazardous materials, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
Response.
0507 Understanding Bioremediation: A Guidebook for
Citizens .„„,,.,- Arn
Order Number PB93-205870CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Feb 91
Bioremediation - a process that uses microorganisms to
transform harmful substances to nontoxic compounds - is
one of the most promising new technologies for treating
chemical spills and hazardous waste problems. In order to
improve the technology and better understand ite capabili-
ties the U S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is en-
couraging field tests and evaluation of waste site cleanups
using bioremediation. As bioremediation is considered more
frequently as a cleanup alternative, citizens need information
about this process to help them contribute to informed deci-
sion-making regarding the cleanup of waste sites in the.
communities. The brochure answers some questions about
what bioremediation is, where it can be used effectively, and
its advantages and disadvantages.
Specifications: See also PB90-216466, PB92-235589 and
PB93-116143. 23p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste treat-
ment, Biological treatment.
0508 Understanding Superfund Risk Assessment
Order Number PB92-963372CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Jul 92
The fact sheet explains the Superfund risk assessment proc-
ess in non-technical terms, defining risk assessment and nsK
management, and describing the four steps of risk assess-
ment Information is also provided on how the public can get
more involved in Superfund risk assessment and suggestions
for further reading.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 8p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Hazardous materials,
Waste management, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
Response.
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION:
Enforcement
0509 Accelerating Potentially Responsible Party Remedial
Design Starts: Implementing the 30-Day Study
Order Number PB92-963608CDH, price: PC A011/MF•AOI
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 2 Apr 92
The directive encourages the regions to use all available.op-
portunities to obtain Potentially Responsible Party (PRP) start
of the Remedial Design (RD) prior to entry of a Consent
Decree. At a minimum, the RD should start at lodging of the
Consent Decree. Where appropriate, regions should have the
RD start even earlier, as soon after signature of the Record
of Decision (ROD) as possible.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. See also PB91-139394. 5p.
86
-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Enforcement
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management
Hazardous materials, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
Response. }
0510 Administrative Order on Consent for Remedial
Investigations/Feasibility Study
Order Number PB91-139378CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
o"™"16"*3' Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 5 Feb 90
The directive provides a model order that is designed to re-
£a^, outdated model order that was issued prior to the
UhRCLA amendments. The model order is designed to facili-
tate settlement negotiations by serving as an opening hand-
position, and to facilitate national consistency. The directive
supersedes directive no. 9835.3 'Model Administrative Order
?Lcate Party Conduct f°r RI/FSs,' dated January 31
1985, and supplements directive no. 9835.8 'Model State-
ment of Work for Remedial Investigations and Feasibility
Study Conducted by Potentially Responsible Parties (PRPs)'
, dated June 2, 1989. ''
Specifications: 34p.
' Subject index keywords: Remedial action, Superfund
Waste management, Hazardous materials, Office of Solid
Waste and Emergency Response.
0511 Administrative Penalty Procedures
Order Number PB92-101963CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
bolid Waste and Emergency Response; 1991
The directive discusses administrative penalty procedures
r£>nf Provides that the administrative assessment of
OERCLA Section 109 penalties and EPCRA Section 325
penalties will be governed by EPA's Consolidated Rules of
Practice Governing the Administrative Assessment of Civil
Penalties and by supplemental rules relating specifically to
penalty assessments under Section 109 of CERCLA and
Section 325 of EPCRA.
Specifications: 8p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste man-
agement, Superfund, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
Response. *
0512 Arbitration Procedures for Small Superfund Cost
Recovery Claims
Order Number PB92-102045CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; 22 May 89
T5prhScti^Jo^!eAments EPA'S authorityunder Section
i^(h)(2) of CERCLA, which authorizes the head of any de-
partment or agency with authority to undertake a response
action under CERCLA to use arbitration as a method of set-
tling CERCLA Section 107(a) claims for recovery of response
costs incurred by the U.S. pursuant to Section 104 of
OtHULA.
Specifications: 18p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Superfund
Waste management, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
Response. a y
0513 BEN: A Model to Calculate the Economic Benefit of
Noncompliance. User's Manual
Order Number PB92-230358CDH, price: PC A08/MF A02
Industrial Economics, Inc., Cambridge, MA.; Environmental
Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of Enforcement-
1 Oct 92
The Agency developed the BEN computer model to calculate
the economic benefit a violator derives from delaying or
avoiding compliance with environmental statutes. In general,
the Agency uses the BEN computer model to assist its own
staff in developing settlement penalty figures. While the pri-
mary purpose of the BEN model is to calculate the economic
benefit of noncompliance, the model may also be used to
calculate the after tax net present value of a pollution pre-
vention or mitigation project and to calculate 'cash outs' in
Superfund cases. The document, the BEN User's Manual,
contains all the formulas that make up the BEN computer
model and is freely available to the public upon request.
Specifications: Sponsored by Environmental Protection
Agency, Washington, DC. Office of Enforcement. 168p.
Subject index keywords: Pollution abatement, Computer-
ized simulation, Benefit cost analysis, Penalties, Standards
compliance, BEN model.
0514 BEN Model: Calculates Violators' Economic Benefits
from Noncompliance (Version 4.0) (for Microcomputers)
Order Number PB94-500998CDH, price: Diskette $140.00
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Enforcement; Dec 93
The model calculates the economic benefit that a company
gains by delaying payment necessary for compliance with
environmental regulations or permits. While the primary pur-
pose of the BEN model is to calculate the economic benefit
of EPA regulation noncompliance, the model may also be
used to calculate the after tax net present value of a pollu-
tion prevention or mitigation project. BEN is not limited to
just environmental regulations; rather, it is a cost analysis
model that presents savings from delaying or avoiding any
expenditures. Users are taken through a series of prompts to
enter specified costs including initial capital investments,
nondepreciable expenditures, annual expenses, dates of
compliance and noncompliance, date of penalty payment,
useful life of pollution control equipment, income tax rates,
inflation rate, and discount rate. The savings from not payinq
are then calculated.
Specifications: The software is on one 3 1/2 inch diskette,
720K double density. Documentation included; may be or-
dered separately as PB94-141652. Will be updated in August
1994. System: DOS operating system. Requires 232K of hard
drive space. Is menu driven. 1 diskette.
Subject index keywords: Pollution abatement, Benefit cost
analysis, Software.
0515 CASHOUT User's Manual for Superfund
Order Number PB94-141678CDH, price: PC A05/MF A01
Industrial Economics, Inc., Cambridge, MA.; Environmental
Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of Enforcement-
Sep 92
The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) developed
the Superfund CASHOUT computer model to calculate the
present value of the cleanup costs at Superfund sites that
the government needs to collect from potentially responsible
parties (PRPs). The CASHOUT computer model will assist
87
-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Enforcement
EPA staff in developing settlement figures for Superfund de
minimis settlements, commonly referred to as 'cash outs'. De
minimis settlements entail the early release from liability of
certain contributors at a Superfund site after they pay their
fair share of the total cleanup costs. Thus, calculating the
present value of cleanup costs using the CASHOUT comput-
er model is generally the first step in 'cashing out' PRPs in-
volved in a de minimis settlement. The 'present value' of
future costs reflects the fact that a dollar today is different
(i.e., worth more) than a dollar tomorrow. Cleanup costs to
be incurred in the future need to be restated in terms of
today's dollars to 'cash out' PRPs. Using the present value
of the total cleanup costs, Agency staff can develop a basis
from which they can estimate each de minimis contributor's
share of the total cleanup costs.
Specifications: For system on diskette, see PB94-501012.
Sponsored by Environmental Protection Agency, Washington,
DC. Office of Enforcement. 76p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Costs, User
manuals(Computer programs).
0516 CERCLA Enforcement Policy Compendium Update
Order Number PB92-963623CDH, price: PC$98.00
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; Sep 92
The compendium is a compilation of documents originated
by the Office of Waste Programs Enforcement, CERCLA En-
forcement Division. Documents contained in the 1992 com-
pendium were issued after August 14, 1990 and are related
to CERCLA Enforcement The compendium also consists of
documents originated by the Office of Enforcement and
Office of Emergency and Remedial Response.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 903p.
Subject Index keywords: Waste management, Hazardous
materials. Law enforcement, Superfund.
0517 CERCLA Implementation of Inspector Training
Requirements for OSCs/RPMs at the Intermediate Level
In STEP and First-Line Supervisors
Order Number PB91-187021CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 3 Apr 91
The directive provides guidance on how two groups of
CERCLA staff can meet or be excepted from the training re-
quirements of EPA Order 3500.1 Inspector Training.
Specifications: 7p.
Subject Index keywords: Personnel development, Super-
fund, Waste management, Office of Solid Waste and Emer-
gency Response, Structured Training and Evaluation Pro-
gram.
0518 CERCLA Implementation of the Training
Requirements of EPA Order 3500.1. Inspector Training
Order Number PB91-139659CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 19 Oct 89
The purpose of the directive is to explain how On-Scene Co-
ordinators (OSCs) and Remedial Project Managers (RPMs)
may satisfy the requirements for Inspector Training under
EPA Order 3500.1, or may be granted an exemption from
those requirements. An exemption may be granted depend-
ing on the implementation of the Structured Training and
Evaluation Program (STEP). STEP is a key component of the
OSC/RPM Support Program created by OSWER. Depending
on the various levels in STEP - Basic, Intermediate, Ad-
vanced or Master - to which an OSC/RPM is assigned, an
exemption may be granted from the training requirements of
the Order.
Specifications: 19p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management.
Hazardous materials, Personnel development, Office of Solid
Wastes and Emergency Response.
0519 Comparative Analysis of Remedies Selected in the
Superfund Program during FY 87, FY 88 and FY 89
Order Number PB91 -139477CDH, price: PC A09/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; 20 Jun 90
The directive determines if there are differences between
remedies selected at Fund-lead and Enforcement-lead sites.
For the bulk of the analysis, sites whose remedial investiga-
tion/feasibility study (RI/FS) was conducted with Superfund
money (Fund-lead) were compared with those whose Rl/h-b
was conducted by potentially responsible parties (PRPs) (En-
forcement-lead). In addition, sites whose remedial design/re-
medial action (RD/RA) is expected to be conducted by PRPs
were compared with sites where the Fund was expected to
conduct RD/RA. The latter comparison was developed to
consider potential influence where PRPs do not conduct the
RI/FS, but offer or are expected to conduct the RD/RA.
Specifications: 179p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Superfund,
Waste management, Remedial action, Office of Solid Waste
and Emergency Response.
0520 Consent Orders and the Reimbursement Provision
Under Section 106(b) of CERCLA
Order Number PB91-139113CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 12 Jun 87
The directive provides guidance regarding terms of consent
orders to preclude parties who have signed consent agree-
ments to subsequently seek reimbursement under section
106(b) of CERCLA.
Specifications: Portions of this document are not fully legi-
ble. 6p.
Subject index keywords: Waste management, Superfund,
Hazardous materials, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
Response.
0521 Consultation on Records of Decision (RODS) for
Containment-Only Remedies
Order Number PB91-228734CDH, price: PC A01/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 2 Oct 90
The directive provides Regions with implementation strategy
for RODs involving containment.
Specifications: 5p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
Hazardous materials, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
Response.
88
-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Enforcement
0522 Coordination of EPA and State Actions in Cost
Recovery
Order Number PB91-138974CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 29 Aug 83
The directive outlines considerations for promoting Federal/
State relations in their respect cost recovery efforts. Also
provides guidance on preparing conditions to cooperative
agreements.
Specifications: Portions of this document are not fully leqi-
ble. 24p. a
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
Hazardous materials, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
Response.
0523 Cost Recovery Actions/Statute of Limitations
Order Number PB91-138982CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 12 Jun 87
The directive updates EPA's policy on timing of cost recov-
ery action. The directive requests EPA staff to focus atten-
tion on the accuracy of data being used to brief Congress on
the status of cost recovery efforts at sites. In addition, the
directive encourages the initiation of cost recovery action for
those sites where the Statute of Limitations date is ap-
proaching. The directive supercedes directive no. 9832.3,
Timing of CERCLA Cost Recovery Actions,' dated October
7, 1985.
Specifications: 6p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management
Hazardous materials, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
Response.
0524 Cost Recovery Actions under CERCLA
Order Number PB91-138966CDH, price: PC A06/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 26 Aug 83
The directive describes the essential elements that the gov-
ernment will probably be called upon to prove in a cost re-
covery action: the assembly and maintenance of a file, some
examples of appropriate documentation for each element of
the cause of action, procedures for processing and negotiat-
ing cost recovery claims, and the mechanics of repayment of
any recovery to the Fund.
Specifications: 104p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management
Hazardous materials, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
Response.
0525 Cost Recovery Referrals
Order Number PB91-138941CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 3 Aug 83
The directive discusses procedures for Regional staff in han-
dling and documenting upcoming section 107 cost recovery
referrals in order to meet Department of Justice require-
ments, in a memorandum dated August 3, 1983. A second
memorandum, dated September 5, 1983, is attached that fur-
ther clarifies the earlier memorandum. A partial list of docu-
ments needed to support cost recovery is attached to the
second memorandum. These memoranda are supplemented
by directive no. 9832.0-1 a, which used to be directive no
9832.4.
Specifications: See also PB91-138958. 7p.
.Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
Hazardous materials, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
Response.
0526 Covenants Not to Sue under SARA
Order Number PB91-139220CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 10 Jul 87
The report updates the Interim Settlement Policy by providing
guidance on the implementation of the mandatory and dis-
cretionary provisions of SARA in relation to the use of cov-
enants not to sue in consent decrees. Attached to the guid-
ance is a model covenant not to sue.
Specifications: 27p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste treat-
ment, Liabilities, Superfund Amendments and Reauthoriza-
tion Act, Cleanup.
0527 Endangerment Assessment Guidance
Order Number PB91-139675CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 21 Oct 85
The directive clarifies the requirement that an endangerment
assessment be developed to support all administrative and
judicial enforcement actions under Section 106 of the Com-
prehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Li-
ability Act (CERCLA) and Section 7003 of the Resource Con-
servation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Before taking enforce-
ment action under these provisions to abate the hazards or
potential hazards at a site, the Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) must be able to properly document and justify
its assertion that an imminent and substantial endangerment
to public health or welfare or the environment may exist. The
endangerment assessment provides the documentation and
justification. The endangerment assessment is not necessary
to support Section 104 actions. It also provides guidance on
the content, timing, level of detail, format, and resources re-
quired for the preparation of endangerment assessments.
Specifications: Portions of this document are not fully legi-
ble. 13p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
Hazardous materials, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
Response, Endangerment assessment.
0528 Endangerment Assessment Guidance
Order Number PB92-101997CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 22 Nov 85
The directive clarifies the requirement that an endangerment
assessment be developed to support all administrative and
judicial enforcement actions under Section 106 of the Com-
prehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Li-
ability Act (CERCLA) and Section 7003 of the Resource Con-
servation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Before taking enforce-
ment action under these provisions to abate the hazards or
potential hazards at a site, the Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) must be able to properly document and justify
its assertion that an imminent and substantial endangerment
to public health or welfare or the environment may exist. The
endangerment assessment provides this documentation and
justification. The endangerment assessment is not necessary
to support Section 104 actions. It also provides guidance on
89
-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Enforcement
the content, timing, level of detail, format, and resources re-
quired for the preparation of endangerment assessments.
Specifications: See also PB92-102144. 20p.
Subject Index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste man-
agement, Superfund, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
Response.
0529 Endangerment Assessment Handbook
Order Number PB91-139683CDH, price: PC A07/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 22 Nov 85
The directive provides guidance on how to develop an en-
dangerment assessment and discusses the level of detail
that is required. It also addresses how the assessment may
be affected by various site-specific enforcement concerns.
Specifications: Portions of this document are not fully legi-
ble. 141 p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
Hazardous materials, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
Response.
0530 Endangerment Assessment Handbook
Order Number PB92-102144CDH, price: PC A13/MF A03
PRC Engineering, Inc., Chicago, IL; Life Systems, Inc.,
Cleveland, OH.*Environmental Protection Agency,
Washington, DC. Office of Waste Programs Enforcement;
Aug 85
Current U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) policy
states that an endangerment assessment is required to sup-
port all administrative and judicial enforcement actions under
Section 106(a) of the Comprehensive Environmental Re-
sponse, Compensation and Liability Act of 1980 (CERCLA)
and Section 7003 of the Resource Conservation and Recov-
ery Act of 1976 (RCRA). This Handbook provides guidance
to EPA regional, state and contractor personnel on conduct-
ing endangerment assessments and preparing the necessary
documentation. Its primary purpose is to assist individuals in
the preparation of endangerment assessment documents
which will satisfy the enforcement needs of each case. The
Handbook explains the use of the endangerment assess-
ment as an enforcement tool and its relationship to the re-
medial investigation (Rl) and feasibility study (FS) processes
at a site. It provides guidance on how to develop an endan-
germent assessment and discusses the timing, scope and
level of detail that are required and how these factors may
be affected by site-specific enforcement concerns.
Specifications: Also pub. as Life Systems, Inc., Cleveland,
OH. rept. no. TR-693-24B. See also PB92-101997. Prepared
in cooperation with Life Systems, Inc., Cleveland, OH. Spon-
sored by Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC.
Office of Waste Programs Enforcement. 278p.
Subject Index keywords: Risk assessment, Hazardous ma-
terials, Waste management, Superfund, Handbooks, Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement.
0531 Enforcement Project Management Handbook
Order Number PB90-780115CDH, price: PC A22/MF A03
Booz-Allen and Hamilton, Inc., Bethesda, MD.; Environmental
Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of Solid Waste
and Emergency Response; Jul 89
The publication is a basic reference and training manual to
assist EPA Superfund field personnel (Remedial Project Man-
agers and On Scene Coordinators) in planning, negotiating
and managing potentially responsible party (PRP) searches
and PRP-lead actions at Superfund sites. It provides an over-
view of each phase of the Superfund enforcement process
and discusses specific roles and responsibilities of the RPM/
OSC in the process.
Specifications: See also PB87-183133 and PB87-183141.
Sponsored by Environmental Protection Agency, Washington,
DC. Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response. 508p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste dis-
posal.
0532 Enforcement Project Management Handbook
Order Number PB91-186999CDH, price: PC A23/MF A03
Booz-Allen and Hamilton, Inc., Bethesda, MD.; Environmental
Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of Solid Waste
and Emergency Response; Jan 91
The handbook has been prepared as a basic reference and
training manual to assist RPMs (Remedial Project Managers)
and OSCs (On-Scene Coordinators) in planning, negotiating
and managing various enforcement actions.
Specifications: Supersedes PB90-780115. Sponsored by
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response. 538p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste dis-
posal.
0533 Enforcement Project Management Handbook
Order Number PB93-963602CDH, price: PC A18/MF A04
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; May 93
The Handbook is intended to be a basic reference and train-
ing manual to assist Remedial Project Managers (RPMs) and
On-Scene Coordinators (OSCs) in planning, negotiating, and
managing Potentially Responsible Party (PRP) searches and
PRP-lead actions. It provides an overview of each phase of
the enforcement process and discusses specific roles and
responsibilities of the RPM/OSC in the process. Procedures
and information contained in the document are based on ex-
isting and draft EPA policy and guidance. Specific documents
are referenced as sources of additional information on par-
ticular topics.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. Supersedes PB91-186999. 404p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Hazardous materials,
Waste disposal.
0534 Entry and Continued Access under CERCLA
Order Number PB91-138867CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 5 Jun 87
The directive describes EPA's policy on entry and continued
access to facilities by EPA officers, employees, and repre-
sentatives for purposes of response and civil enforcement
activities under CERCLA. The policy recommends that EPA
should seek to obtain access through consent.
Specifications: See also PB91-138859. 18p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
Hazardous materials, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
Response.
90
-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Enforcement
0535 Environmental Compliance Branch, Standard
Operating Procedures and Quality Assurance Manual
Revision 1
Order Number PB91-233650CDH, price: PC A19/MF A04
Environmental Protection Agency, Athens, GA.
Environmental Services Div; 1 Feb 91
The document contains the field procedures developed by
US-EPA, Region IV, ESD for investigating hazardous waste
sites for the FtCRA and Superiund programs, performance of
NPDES inspection and air monitoring. In particular, sampling
of environmental media and waste, sample handling and
preservation, decontamination of field equipment, installation
of monitoring wells, and field quality assurance procedures
are described. Sampling equipment is discussed and de-
scribed. Surveying requirements for site characterization are
given.
Specifications: 449p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Site sur-
veys, Waste management, EPA region 4. •.
0536 EPA Interim Guidance on Indemnification of
Superfund Response Action Contractors Under Section
119 of SARA
Order Number PB91-139402CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; 6 Oct 87
The directive provides guidance to EPA Regional personnel
on EPA Superfund response action contractor indemnifica-
tion, including EPA interim guidelines, procedures for proc-
essing indemnification requests, and model indemnification
contract language.
Specifications: 38p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management
Hazardous materials, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
Response.
0537 Evaluating Mixed Funding Settlements under
CERCLA
Order Number PB91-139238CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 20 Oct 87
The report provides guidance to the Regions for evaluating
settlement proposals that the Regions may receive from po-
tentially responsible parties for EPA to provide mixed funding
at CERCLA sites. The goals of the guidance are to encour-
age, the Regions to consider mixed funding settlements,
present a method for mixed funding, and to present criteria
for evaluating good versus poor candidates.
Specifications: 20p.
Subject index keywords: Financing, Government policies,
Waste treatment, Superfund, Comprehensive Environmental
Response.
0538 Evaluation of, and Additional Guidance on, Issuance
of Unilateral Administrative Orders (UAOs) for RD/RA
Order Number PB91-201764CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 20 Jun 91
The purpose of the directive is to present the results of a
recent evaluation conducted by the Office of Waste Pro-
grams Enforcement (OWPE) of the selection process EPA
uses in issuing UAOs to Potentially Responsible Parties
(PRPs) for RD/RA under CERCLA; and, based on the eval-
uation, to give further guidance on the process used to
select recipients of UAOs.
Specifications: 6p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
Remedial action, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Re-
sponse, Record of Decision, Potentially responsible parties.
0539 Expanded Civil Judicial Referral Procedures
Order Number PB91-139766CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 28 Aug 86
The directive provides guidance on procedures for civil judi-
cial referrals to the Department of Justice. The memorandum
expands the current direct referral program, indicates that
Headquarters should not establish mandatory requirements
for pre-referral negotiations, mandates use of 'hold action'
cases only for strategic or tactical reasons and offers guid-
ance on the preparation of bankruptcy cases.
Specifications: See also PB91-139774. 16p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
Hazardous materials, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
Response.
0540 Expansion of Direct Referral of Cases to the
Department of Justice
Order Number PB91-139790CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 14 Jan 88
The directive provides guidance to EPA Headquarters and
Regional personnel regarding procedures to follow in imple-
menting the expanded direct referral agreement. Prior guid-
ance on direct referrals appears in a November 28, 1983,
memorandum entitiled, 'Implementation of Direct Referrals
for Civil Cases Beginning December 1, 1983.' That guidance
is superseded to the extent that the current guidance re-
places or changes procedures set forth therein; otherwise
the 1983 document remains in effect.
Specifications: 16p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
Hazardous materials, Office of Solid Waste and Emergericy
Response.
0541 Final EPA Policy on the Inclusion of Environmental
Auditing Provisions in Enforcement Settlements
Order Number PB92-102094CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 14 Nov 86
The purpose of the directive is to provide Agency enforce-
ment personnel with general criteria for and guidance on se-
lecting judicial and administrative enforcement cases in
which EPA will seek to include environmental auditing provi-
sions among terms of any settlement.
Specifications: 73p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Superfund,
Waste management, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
Response.
91
-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Enforcement
0542 Final Guidance on Preparing Waste-In Lists and
Volumetric Rankings for Release to Potentially
Responsible Parties (PRPs) under CERCLA ('Waste-In'
Guidance)
Order Number PB91-187005CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 22 Feb 91
The directive provides guidance on the compilation and re-
lease of waste-in lists and volumetric rankings to help Re-
gions comply with the information release requirements of
CERCLA section 122(e) and the information release and ex-
change policies outlined in OSWER directives 9835.12 and
9834.10.
Specifications: 30p.
Subject index keywords: Waste management, Superfund,
Notification procedures, Hazardous materials, Office of Solid
Waste and Emergency Response.
0543 First 125 De Minimis Settlements: Statistics from
EPA's De Minimis Database
Order Number PB94-963606CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Oct 93
Under Section 122(g) of the Comprehensive Environmental
Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA), EPA
is encouraged to reach settlements with two types of parties:
de minimis waste contributors and de minimis landowners.
Since 1986, when Section 122(g) was passed as part of the
Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization Act, EPA has
entered into about 125 de minimis settlements, thereby re-
solving the liability of more than 6,000 parties. In an effort to
facilitate the greater use of de minimis settlements, EPA has
developed the De Minimis Database, a comprehensive
system designed to track over 100 data elements for each
settlement. EPA is using this system to track and analyze all
finalized de minimis settlements. This report summarizes
data maintained in the De Minimis Database. The information
contained in the database is drawn from several sources:
final de minimis settlement documents (including attach-
ments such as settlor lists and signature pages); a survey
questionnaire completed by EPA Regional personnel for
each settlement; CERCLIS (the Comprehensive Environmen-
tal Response, Compensation, and Liability Information
System); and the ROD Annual Reports.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 25p.
Subject Index keywords: Hazardous wastes, Waste man-
agement, Data base management, Office of Solid Waste and
Emergency Response, De minimis settlements.
0544 Guidance of the Use of Stipulated Penalties in
Hazardous Waste Consent Decrees
Order Number PB91-139360CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 27 Sep 89
The directive provides guidance on the use of stipulated pen-
alties in hazardous waste consent decrees. The directive
supplements directive no. 9835.2 'Guidance on Draft Con-
sent Decrees in Hazardous Waste Cases,' dated May 1,
1985.
Specifications: 22p.
Subject index keyword!}: Superfund, Waste management,
Hazardous materials, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
Response.
0545 Guidance on Applicability of EPA Order 3500.1 to
CERCLA Staff
Order Number PB91-139642CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 28 Nov 88
The directive defines, through guidance to the Regions,
which CERCLA staff are subject to the requirements of EPA
order 3500.1. The order established training requirements for
compliance inspectors and field investigators.
Specifications: Portions of this document are not fully legi-
ble. 6p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
Hazardous materials, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
Response.
0546 Guidance on CERCLA Section 106 Judicial Actions
Order Number PB91-139428CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 24 Feb 89
The directive provides criteria for consideration in selecting
and initiating CERCLA section 106 judicial actions. The guid-
ance also identifies and discusses issues that should be con-
sidered in preparation of a section 106 referral.
Specifications: 12p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
Hazardous materials, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
Response.
0547 Guidance on CERCLA Settlements with De Micromis
Waste Contributors
Order Number PB93-963619CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; 30 Jul 93
The purpose of the memorandum is to provide guidance on
using CERCLA's settlement authorities to resolve the
CERCLA liability of parties who have contributed even less
hazardous substances to a site than the de minimis parties
the Agency traditionally pursues. These parties will herein-
after be referred to as 'de micromis' parties. The memoran-
dum describes the types of situations in which a Region may
find that it is in the public interest to exercise enforcement
discretion by offering de micromis settlements. The guidance
also explains how to use EPA's existing settlement authority
in an expeditious manner to resolve the liability of de micro-
mis parties and to grant them the full extent of contribution
protection available under the statute.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $225 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $450). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 18p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Hazardous materials,
Waste disposal, Lawsuits.
92
-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Enforcement
0548 Guidance on CERCLA 106(a) Unilateral
Administrative Orders for Remedial Designs and
Remedial Actions
Order Number PB91-139089CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 13 Mar 90
The directive discusses section 106 unilateral orders and the
CERCLA remedial program, and statutory requirements and
policy factors for issuing section 106 unilateral orders for re-
medial designs and remedial actions. Key provisions of uni-
lateral orders and specialized forms and use of such orders
also are discussed. The directive supplements directive no.
9833.0, entitled 'Guidance on the Use and Issuance of Ad-
ministrative Orders Under Section 106,' dated September 8
1983, and directive no. 9833.0-2b 'Model Administrative
Order for Remedial Designs and Remedial Action,' dated
March 30, 1990.
Specifications: See also PB91-139097. 38p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Hazardous materials
Waste management, Office of Solid Waste and Emerqencv
Response.
0549 Guidance on Documenting Decisions Not to Take
Cost Recovery Actions
Order Number PB91-139048CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 7 Jun 88
The directive provides information to Regional Superfund
personnel on the content of close-out memoranda that
should be written for each site where EPA does not intend,
on the basis of certain information, to pursue an action for
cost recovery of unreimbursed Superfund monies.
Specifications: 10p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management
Hazardous materials, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
Response.
0550 Guidance on Drafting Consent Decrees in
Hazardous Waste Cases
Order Number PB91-139345CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 1 May 85
The directive focuses on the consent decree provisions
which are vital to settlement in hazardous waste cases, and
are handled differently or not at all under other programs.
The directive supplements directive no. 9835.0 'Interim
CERCLA Settlement Policy,' dated December 5, 1984.
Specifications: 26p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management
Hazardous materials, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
Response.
0551 Guidance on Federal Superfund Liens
Order Number PB91-139055CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; 22 Sep 87
The directive establishes guidance on the use of Federal
liens to enhance Superfund cost recovery. Section 107(f) of
the Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization Act of 1986
adds a new section 107(1) to CERCLA, which provides for
the establishment of a Federal lien in favor of the United
States upon property that is the subject of a removal or re-
medial action. The guidance provides: (1) analysis of statuto-
ry issues regarding the nature and scope to the lien, (2)
policy on filing a Federal lien to support a cost recovery
action, and (3) procedures for filing a notice of lien and
taking an 'in rem' action to recover the costs of a lien.
Specifications: 12p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
Hazardous materials, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
Response.
0552 Guidance on Landowner Liability under Section
107(a)(1) of CERCLA, De Minimis Settlements under
Section 122(g)(1)(B) of CERCLA, and Settlements with
Prospective Purchasers of Contaminated Property
Order Number PB91-139444CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 6 Jun 89
The purpose of the directive is to provide general guidance
on landowner liability under the Comprehensive Environmen-
tal Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980
('CERCLA'), as amended by the Superfund Amendments and
Reauthorization Act of 1986, Pub.L. No.99-499 ('SARA'), 42
U.S.C. S9601 et seq., and to provide specific guidance on
which landowners qualify for de minimis settlements under
Section 122(g)(1)(B) and on structuring such settlements. Be-
cause the nature of a de minimis settlement with a landown-
er will differ substantially from a de minimis settlement with
waste contributors, it will usually be more efficient to draft
such agreements separately. In addition, because the
Agency has received numerous requests from prospective
purchasers of contaminated property for covenants not to
sue, the memorandum sets forth Agency policy on this issue.
Specifications: Portions of this document are not fully legi-
ble. 59p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
Hazardous materials, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
Response.
0553 Guidance on Premium Payments in CERCLA
Settlements
Order Number PB91-139410CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 17 Nov 88
The directive provides guidance on the use of premium pay-
ments in CERCLA settlements. It describes the key features
of a premium payment settlement, considerations regarding
timing of the settlement, and the factors to be considered in
deciding if a premium should be accepted.
Specifications: 19p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
Hazardous materials, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
Response.
0554 Guidance on Preparing Waste-in Lists and
Volumetric Rankings for Release to Potentially
Responsible Parties (PRPs) under CERCLA
Order Number PB92-963606CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; 22 Feb 91
The directive provides guidance on the compilation and re-
lease of waste-in lists and volumetric rankings to help Re-
gions comply with the information release requirements of
CERCLA section 122(e) and the information release and ex-
change policies outlined in OSWER directives 9835.12 and
9834.10.
93
-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Enforcement
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 29p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
Hazardous materials, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
Response.
0555 Guidance on Procedures for Submitting CERCLA
Section 106(b) Reimbursement Petitions and on EPA
Review of Those Petitions
Order Number PB92-963610CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 29 Jun 92
The directive describes the procedures for submitting a
CERCLA Section 106(b) petition. In addition, the document
describes EPA's process for reviewing the petitions.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 21 p.
Subject Index keywords: Superfund, Hazardous materials,
Waste management, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
Response.
0556 Guidance Regarding CERCLA Enforcement against
Bankrupt Parties
Order Number PB91-139014CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 24 May 84
The directive assists the Regions in developing CERCLA en-
forcement actions against bankrupt parties. The guidance is
intended to encourage agressive enforcement against insol-
vent parties and ensure national consistency in current and
future bankruptcy cases brought by the Agency. The guid-
ance is supplemented by directive no. 9832.7-1 a, which used
to be directive no. 9832.8, 'Revised Hazardous Waste Bank-
ruptcy Guidance,' dated May 23, 1986.
Specifications: See also PB91-139022. 47p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Hazardous materials,
Waste management, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
Response.
0557 Initiation of PRP-Financed Remedial Design in
Advance of Consent Decree Entry (Final)
Order Number PB91-139394CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 18 Nov 88
The directive addresses a process for expediting the initi-
ation of response work by potentially responsible parties at
sites where agreements with PRPs have been reached, but
where consent decrees have not yet been entered by the
court.
Specifications: 8p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
Hazardous materials, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
Response.
0558 Interim Cashout Settlement Procedures
Order Number PB92-963609CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 7 Jan 92
The directive addresses certain issues related to Superfund
cashout settlements. These interim procedures provides ap-
i
proaches to resolve certain issues which arose in recent ca-
shout settlements.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 15p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
Hazardous materials, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
Response, Cashout settlements.
0559 Interim CERCLA Settlement Policy
Order Number PB91-139329CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 5 Dec 84
The directive discusses private party cleanup and contribu-
tion proposals under CERCLA. It is supplemented by direc-
tives no. 9835.2 and 9834.2.
Specifications: Portions of this document are not fully legi-
ble. 24p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
Hazardous materials, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
Response.
0560 Interim Guidance on Notice Letters, Negotiations,
and Information Exchange
Order Number PB91-139253CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 19 Oct 87
The report provides guidance to the Regions on issuing
notice letters, entering into negotiations, and exchanging in-
formation with potentially responsible parties. The guidance
contains a discussion of the section 122(e) special notice
procedures and the subsequent negotiation moratorium.
Specifications: 43p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste treat-
ment, Liabilities.
0561 Interim Guidance on Potentially Responsible Party
Participation in Remedial Investigations and Feasibility
Studies
Order Number PB91-139337CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 16 May 88
The directive sets forth policies and procedures governing
potentially responsible party participation in the remedial in-
vestigations and feasibility studies process, including initiation
of PRP searches, PRP notifications, development of agree-
ments, and oversight of RI/FS activities. The document su-
persedes directive no. 9835.1 'Participation of Potentially Re-
sponsible Parties in Development of RIs and FSs under
CERCLA,' dated March 3, 1984.
Specifications: Portions of this document are not fully legi-
ble. 42p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
Hazardous materials, Remedial action, Office of Solid Waste
and Emergency Response, Potentially responsible parties.
94
-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Enforcement
0562 Interim Guidance on Settlements with De Minimis
Waste Contributors under Section 122(g) of SARA
Order Number PB91-139196CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 19 Jun 87
The directive provides interim guidance for determining which
potentially responsible parties qualify for treatment as de
minimus waste contributors pursuant to section 122(g)(1)(A)
of the Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization Act of
1986, and to present interim guidelines for settlement with
such de minimus parties pursuant to section 122(g) of SARA.
The directive is superseded by directive 9834.7-1 A 'Interim
Model CERCLA Section 122(g)(4) De Minimus Waste Con-
tributor Consent Decree and Administrative Order on Con-
sent,' dated October 19, 1987.
Specifications: 34p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
Hazardous materials, Office of Solid Waste and Emerqency
Response.
0563 Interim Guidance: Streamlining the CERCLA
Settlement Decision Process
Order Number PB91-139386CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 12 Feb 87 '
The directive provides guidance to streamline and improve
the CERCLA settlement decision process. The guidance ad-
dresses three areas of settlement process: (1) negotiation
preparation, (2) management review, and (3) criteria for ter-
minating or continuing negotiations. The directive is supple-
mented by directive no. 9835.4-1 a.
Specifications: Portions of this document are not fully legi-
ble. 15p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Hazardous materials,
Waste management, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
Response.
0564 Interim Guidelines for Preparing Nonbinding
Preliminary Allocations of Responsibility
Order Number PB92-102078CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 1991
The directive discusses Section 122(e)(3) of the Superfund
Amendments and Reauthorization Act of 1986 (SARA), Pub.
L. No. 99-499, which amended the Comprehensive Environ-
mental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980
(CERCLA), 42 U.S.C. Sections 9601 et seq., which requires
the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to develop
guidelines for preparing nonbinding preliminary allocations of
responsibility (NBARs). As defined in Section 122(e)(3)(A), an
NBAR is an allocation by EPA among potentially responsible
parties (PRPs) of percentages of total response costs at a
facility. SARA authorizes EPA to provide NBARs at its discre-
tion. NBARs are a tool EPA may use in appropriate cases to
promote remedial settlements.
Specifications: 11 p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Superfund
Waste management, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
Response, Nonbinding Preliminary Allocations of Responsi-
bility.
0565 Interim Model CERCLA Section 122(g) (4) De
Minimis Waste Contributor Consent Decree and
Administrative Order on Consent
Order Number PB91-139204CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 19 Oct 87
The report provides interim model language to assist the Re-
gions in drafting de minimi's waste contributor consent de-
crees and administrative orders on consent under section
122(g)(4) of CERCLA, as amended by SARA. There are
models attached to the memorandum.
Specifications: 20p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste dis-
posal, Law(Jurisprudence), Superfund.
0566 Interim Policy on Mixed Funding Settlements
Involving the Preauthorization of States or Political
Subdivisions
Order Number PB91-139246CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 27 May 88
The report establishes EPA's interim policy on the use of
mixed funding/preauthorization settlements of States or polit-
ical subdivisions that are potentially responsible parties. The
guidance clarified that States and political subdivisions are
eligible to file preauthorization claims against the Fund when
they are acting pursuing to settlement agreement. The direc-
tive supplements directive No. 9834.9 'Evaluating Mixed
Funding Agreements Under CERCLA,' dated October 20
1987.
Specifications: 6p.
Subject index keywords: Government policies, Financing,
Waste treatment, Superfund.
0567 Issuance of Administrative Orders for Immediate
Removal Actions
Order Number PB91-139105CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 21 Feb 84
The directive sets forth guidance on issuing administrative
orders for immediate removal actions under CERCLA. The
guidance should be used in conjunction with the recently
issued 'Guidance on the Use and Issuance of Administrative
Orders under Section 106(a) of CERCLA,' dated September
8, 1983.
Specifications: Portions of this document are not fully leqi-
ble. 15p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
Hazardous materials, Remedial action, Office of Solid Waste
and Emergency Response.
0568 Issuance of Administrative Orders Under Section
3013 of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act
Order Number PB91-140111CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 30 May 86
Section 17 of the Solid Waste Disposal Act Amendments of
1980 (P.L 96482) added Section 3013 to the Resource Con-
servation and Recovery Act of 1976 (RCRA). The directive
provides guidance on the use of that section and replaces
earlier guidance issued September 11, 1981. Under current
delegation authority Section 3013 Administrative Orders are
issued by Regional Administrator (RAs) with the advance
95
-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Enforcement
concurrence of the Director, Office of Waste Programs En-
forcement (OWPE) except in cases of national significance
or multi-regional cases. Then the director, OWPE, issues the
Orders. The Assistant Administrator for Enforcement and
Compliance Monitoring (OECM), consults as requested on
orders, refers Section 3013 judicial actions to the Depart-
ment of Justice, and sends notices of such actions to the ap-
propriate RA and the Director OWPE. Further redelegation is
currently under review.
Specifications: 50p.
Subject Index keywords: Waste management, Superfund,
Hazardous materials, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
Response.
0569 Issuance of Final Revised Guidance on the Use and
Issuance of Administrative Orders Under Section 7003 of
the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA)
Order Number PB91-140129CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 26 Sep 84
The directive discusses guidance on the use and issuance of
Administrative Orders under Section 7003 of RCRA where
there is an emiminent and substantial endangerment to
public health and the environment. In order to issue a Sec-
tion 7003 order, the Administrator must possess evidence
'that the handling, storage, treatment, transportation or dis-
posal of any solid waste or hazardous waste may present an
imminent and substantial endangerment to health or the en-
vironment' (42 U.S.C. Section 6973). Additionally, Section
7003 requires that the Administrator provide notice to the af-
fected State prior to issuance of the order. Each of these re-
quirements is discussed in the directive.
Specifications: 25p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
Hazardous materials, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
Response.
0570 Liability of Corporate Shareholders and Successor
Corporations for Abandoned Sites Under the
Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation
and Liability Act
Order Number PB91-139030CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 13 Jun 84
The directive identifies legal principles bearing on the extent
to which corporate shareholders and successor corporations
may be held liable for response costs that arise as a result
of a release at a hazardous waste facility.
Specifications: 20p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
Hazardous materials, Remedial action, Office of Solid Waste
and Emergency Response.
0571 Limiting Lead Transfers to Private Parties during
Discrete Phases of the Remedial Process
Order Number PB92-963602CDH, price: PC A01/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 14 Nov 91
In order to avoid delays caused by remedial process lead
changes from EPA to private parties, this directive recom-
mends to Regions that they avoid letting PRPs assume the
lead In the middle of a discrete phase of the process (e.g.,
RI/FS, RD, or RA), and take preemptive steps to avoid
delays when making lead changes between the RD and RA.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 5p.
Subject index keywords;: Superfund, Waste management,
Hazardous materials, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
Response.
0572 Methodologies for Implementation of CERCLA
Section 122(g) (1) (A) De Minimis Waste Contributor
Settlements Proposals and Agreements
Order Number PB91-139212CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 20 Dec 89
The report provides assistance to the Regional case staff in
the evaluation and development of de minimis contributor
settlement proposals and agreements. The methodologies
presented are general suggestions, recognizing the site-spe-
cific aspects of each site.
Specifications: 26p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous wastes, Waste dispos-
al, Waste treatment, Superfund.
0573 Methodology for Early De Minimis Waste
Contributor Settlements under CERCLA Section 122(g)
(1) (A)
Order Number PB92-963607CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 2 Jun 92
The directive sets forth procedures for identifying early de
minimis candidates for potential de minimis settlements early
in the response process (for example, prior to the signature
of a Record of Decision), and provides a methodology for
developing such settlements. The report also provides practi-
cal assistance in developing early de minimis settlement pro-
posals and agreements. It supplements OSWER Directive
9847.7-1 B 'Methodologies for Implementation of CERCLA
Section 122(g)(1)(A) De Minimis Waste Contributor Settle-
ments', dated December 20, 1989.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. See also PB91-139212. 22p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
Hazardous materials, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
Response.
0574 Model Administrative Order on Consent for
Removal Actions
Order Number PB93-963605CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Mar 93
The model order on consent for removal actions embodies
the language that EPA regional offices should use when is-
suing removal administrative orders on consent.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 29p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste man-
agement, Remedial action, Superfund, Record of Decision,
Waste removal.
-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Enforcement
0575 Model Informational Notice Letter to Local
Governments
Order Number PB91-187013CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 7 May 91
The directive is a model letter which will be used to notify
local governments of EPA's activities which will take place
within their jurisdiction at a Superfund site.
Specifications: 8p.
Subject index keywords: Local government, Superfund, No-
tification procedures, Waste management, Office of Solid
Waste and Emergency Response.
0576 Model Litigation Report for CERCLA Sections 106
and 107 and RCRA Section 7003
Order Number PB91-139451CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 21 Jun 89
The directive supplements previous Agency guidance entitled
'Model Litigation Report Outline and Guidance' (OECM,
August 23, 1984), which addressed the preparation of a liti-
gation package under most statutes, but excluded, among
others, packages to be prepared for prosecution of civil judi-
cial actions under CERCLA Sections 106 and 107 and RCRA
Section 7003. The model is intended for use in all civil judi-
cial cases referred to the Department of Justice for prosecu-
tion under CERCLA Sections 106 and 107 and RCRA Sec-
tion 7003. For those actions referred in conjunction with a
settlement, a full litigation report is not required. The docu-
ment also does not specifically address preparation of litiga-
tion reports for prosecution of penalty actions under
CERCLA Sections 106(b), 109 or 122(1), although many sec-
tions of the document may be applicable to the preparation
of such litigation reports.
Specifications: 47p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
Hazardous materials, Lawsuits, Office of Solid Waste and
Emergency Response.
0577 Model Notice Letters
Order Number PB91-139279CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 2 Jul 89
The report includes the model notice letters to be used in
preparing site-specific notice letters to PRP's. The letters
notify Potential responsible parties of their potential CERCLA
liability.
Specifications: 41 p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste treat-
ment, Liabilities.
0578 Model Statement of Work for a Remedial
Investigation and Feasibility Study Conducted by
Potentially Responsible Parties
Order Number PB91-139436CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC: Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 2 Jun 89
The directive provides potentially responsible parties with di-
rection in performing tasks that are required to successfully
complete a remedial investigation and feasibility study. The
model statement of work is used in conjunction with OERR's
October 1988 RI/FS guidance, and closely follows the model
RI/FS administrative order on consent. The directive supple-
ments directive no. 9355.3-01.
Specifications: 35p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
Hazardous materials, Remedial action, Office of Solid Waste
and Emergency Response, Potentially responsible parties.
0579 Model Unilateral Administrative Order for Removal
Response Activities
Order Number PB93-963606CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Mar 93
The directive embodies the language that EPA regional of-
fices should use when issuing removal unilateral administra-
tive orders.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 23p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste man-
agement, Superfund, Waste removal.
0580 Model Unilateral Order for Remedial Design and
Remedial Action
Order Number PB91-139097CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 30 Mar 90
The directive establishes a model order for remedial design
and remedial action. The purpose of the model is to improve
the quality of remedial actions performed by private parties,
promote consistency among the Regions, and to expedite
potentially responsible parties (PRP)-lead cleanups at
CERCLA sites. The directive supplements directive no.
9833.0-1 (a) entitled, 'Guidance on CERCLA 106(a) Unilateral
Administrative Orders for Remedial Designs and Remedial
Actions,' dated March 13, 1990.
Specifications: See also PB91-139089. 49p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
Hazardous materials, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
Response.
0581 Multi-Media Settlements of Enforcement Claims
Order Number PB91-139808CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 6 Feb 90
The directive explains EPA policy disfavoring judicial and ad-
ministrative settlements which include releases of potential
enforcement claims.
Specifications: 9p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
Hazardous materials, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
Response.
0582 Multi-Media Settlements of Enforcement Claims
Order Number PB92-102136CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 6 Feb 90
The purpose of the directive is to provide guidance which ex-
plains (1) EPA policy strongly disfavoring judicial and admin-
istrative settlements of enforcement cases which include re-
leases of potential enforcement claims under statutes which
are not named in the complaint and do not serve as the
basis for the Agency bringing the enforcement action, and
(2) how approval for any multi-media settlements of enforce-
97
-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Enforcement
merit claims should be obtained in civil judicial enforcement
cases in the Region and at Headquarters.
Specifications: 7p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Superfund,
Waste management, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
Response.
0583 Municipal Settlements
Order Number PB91-139311CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 6 Dec 89
The directive establishes EPA's interim policy on settlements
involving municipal waste.
Specifications: 39p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
Municipal wastes, Remedial action, Municipal Settlement
Policy, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response.
0584 Policy for Enforcement Actions against
Transporters under CERCLA
Order Number PB91-138859CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 23 Dec 85
The directive defines parties which are liable for response
costs under section 107(A)(4) of CERCLA, including persons
who transport hazardous substances to disposal or treatment
facilities.
Specifications: See also PB91-138867. 8p.
Subject Index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
Hazardous materials, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
Response.
0585 Policy on Recovering Indirect Cost in CERCLA
Section 107 Cost Recovery Actions
Order Number PB91-138990CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 27 Jun 86
The directive clarifies EPA's policy regarding the recovery of
indirect costs in CERCLA cost recovery actions, stating that
the decision whether to seek indirect costs in existing cases
will be made by the Regions after consultation with the De-
partment of Justice and with the concurrence of EPA's Office
of Enforcement Compliance and Monitoring and Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement.
Specifications: 7p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
Hazardous materials, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
Response.
0586 Policy Towards Owners of Residential Property at
Superfund Sites
Order Number PB91-205476CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; 3 Jul 91
The directive sets forth The Agency's enforcement policy to-
wards owners of residential property located on a Superfund
Site. Under this policy the Agency, in the exercise of enforce-
ment discretion will not pursue owners of residential property
for performance of a response action or payment of re-
sponse costs. This policy does not apply where the owners'
activities lead to a release or threat of release of hazardous
substances, resulting in the taking of a response action at
the site. This policy does not apply where the owner fails to
cooperate with the Agency's response action, fails to cooper-
ate with institutional controls places on the property, fails to
.meet other CERCLA obligations, or uses the residential prop-
erty inconsistent with residential use.
Specifications: 10p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
Hazardous materials, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
Response.
0587 Policy Towards Owners of Residential Property at
Superfund Sites
Order Number PB92-963615CDH, price: PC A01/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 1992
The document summarizes the US EPA policy towards
owners of residential property at Superfund Sites. The policy
addresses concerns raised by owners of residential property
located on Superfund sites and provides Regions with a na-
tionally consistent approach on the issue. The guidance sets
forth in writing what has been the Agency's past practice to-
wards owners of residential property located on Superfund
sites.
Specifications: Available on Standing Order, deposit ac-
count required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada, and
Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. See also PB91-205476. 4p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Property
owners, Residential buildings, Government policies.
0588 Preparation of Hazardous Waste Referrals
Order Number PB91-139543CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 30 Jul 85
The directive discusses experience with the implementation
of the Case Management Handbook. It indicates that filing by
the Department of Justice has been delayed in some cases
by specific problems (as listed in the directive).
Specifications: 8p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
Hazardous materials, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
Response.
0589 Procedural Guidance on Treatment of Insurers
under CERCLA
Order Number PB91-139188CDH, price: PC A05/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 21 Nov 85
The report provides EPA Regional offices with the appropri-
ate procedures to follow in issuing notice letters, developing
referrals, and tracking CERCLA enforcement cases that may
include insurers as third-party defendants.
Specifications: 76p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste dis-
posal, Law enforcement, Case studies.
0590 Procedures for Documenting Costs for CERCLA
Section 107 Actions
Order Number PB91-138958CDH, price: PC A06/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 30 Jan 85
The directive sets forth the procedures for documenting
costs for CERCLA section 107 cost recovery actions. These
procedures require the close cooperation and coordination
among Headquarters and Regional program, legal, and finan-
-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Enforcement
cial offices. The procedures manual should be used in con-
junction with the Case Development Handbook. The guid-
ance supplements directive no. 9832.0, and replaces direc-
tive no. 9832.4 by number only; the document has not
changed.
Specifications: See also PB91 -138941. 125p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
Hazardous materials, Office of Solid Waste and Emerqencv
Response.
0591 Procedures for Transmittal of CERCLA and RCRA
Civil Judicial Enforcement Case Packages to
Headquarters
Order Number PB91-139774CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 12 Jun 89
The directive clarifies which CERCLA and RCRA referral and
settlement documents are to be sent to whom at Headquar-
ters. The directive supplements directive no. 9891.1 'Expand-
ed Civil Judicial Referral Procedures,' dated August 28, 1986.
Specifications: See also PB91-139766. 6p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
Hazardous materials, Office of Solid Waste and Emerqencv
Response.
0592 PRP Search Supplemental Guidance for Sites in the
Superfund Remedial Program
Order Number PB91-139162CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; 16 Jun 89
The purpose of the document is to provide guidance on po-
tentially responsible parties (PRP) search planning and man-
agement and on the content of PRP search reports. The
guidance applies to sites in the remedial program and it sup-
plements the August, 1987 PRP Search Manual.
Specifications: 38p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
Hazardous materials, Office of Solid Waste and Emerqencv
Response.
0593 Redelegation of Civil Judicial Settlement Authorities
under Delegation 14-13-B and 14-14-E
Order Number PB91-138834CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; 18 Aug 88
The document is composed of redelegations and consulta-
tion on judicial settlements and de minimis settlements to Di-
rector of the Office of Waste Programs, from AA/OSWER.
Specifications: 9p.
Subject index keywords: Refuse disposal, Penalties, Office
of Solid Waste and Emergency Response, Comprehensive
Environment Response Compensation and Liability Act.
0594 Releasing Identities of Potentially Responsible
Parties in Response to FOIA Requests
Order Number PB91-139147CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 26 Jan 84
The directive provides EPA policy on responding to requests
under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) for the names
of potentially responsible parties at CERCLA sites, and ex-
plains exceptions. The guidance states that in response to a
FOIA request, EPA will release the names of PRPs who have
received notice letters about CERCLA sites.
Specifications: 7p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Hazardous materials,
Waste management, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
Response.
0595 Releasing Information to Potentially Responsible
Parties at CERCLA Sites
Order Number PB91-139469CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 1 Mar 90
The directive presents Agency policy on releasing informa-
tion, for the purpose of facilitating settlement, to potentially
responsible parties (PRP) at sites addressed under CERCLA.
The directive partially supersedes directive no. 9835.0 'Inter-
im CERCLA Settlement Policy' and supplements directive no.
9834.0 'Releasing Identities of PRPs in Response to Free-
dom of Information Act Requests' and directive no. 9834.10
'Interim Guidance on Notice Letters, Negotiations and Infor-
mation Exchange,' dated October 19, 1987.
Specifications: 9p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
Hazardous materials, Off ice-of Solid Waste and Emergency
Response.
0596 Report to Congress: Settlements with Municipal
Waste Generators and Transporters Since 1991 under
the Comprehensive Environmental Response,
Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980
Order Number PB93-963604CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 12 Mar 93
The report to Congress summarizes the status of completed
settlements and ongoing negotiations with municipal genera-
tors and transporters of municipal solid waste and municipal
sewage sludge under the Comprehensive Environmental Re-
sponse, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980 since 1991.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 9p.
Subject index keywords: Municipal wastes, Hazardous ma-
terials transportation, Waste management, Sewage sludge,
Superfund, Settlements.
0597 Revised EPA Guidance on Parallel Proceedings
Order Number PB91-139667CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 21 Jun 89
The directive provides guidance on simultaneous pursuit of
criminal prosecutions and civil, judicial, or Agency administra-
tive actions.
Specifications: Portions of this document are not fully legi-
ble. 27p.
Subject index keywords: Waste management, Superfund,
Hazardous materials, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
Response.
0598 Revised Hazardous Waste Bankruptcy Guidance
Order Number PB91-139022CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 23 May 86
The directive supplements the May 24, 1984, guidance
'CERCLA Enforcement Against Bankrupt Parties' and the
99
-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Enforcement
guidelines on bankruptcy contained in the Cost Recovery
Handbook 'Procedures for Documenting Costs for CERCLA
Section 107 Actions,' directive no. 9832.7, dated January 30,
1985. The memorandum defines specific criteria for evaluat-
ing the merits of a potential bankruptcy referral and elabo-
rates on the policy regarding settlement with bankrupt par-
ties. It reviews the recent judicial decisions in the areas of
the automatic stay, abandonment, discharge, and claims of
administrative expenses, and briefly describes the new en-
forcement theories that have been asserted by the Agency in
recent pleadings.
Specifications: See also PB91-139014. 28p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
Hazardous materials, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
Response.
0599 Revised Hazardous Waste Bankruptcy Guidance,
October 7,1991
Order Number PB92-105485CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Corvallis Environmental Research Lab., OR; 7 Oct 91
The Agency's recent experience in CERCLA and RCRA
bankruptcy actions has identified the need for updated and
revised guidance on the scope of EPA's enforcement actions
against bankrupt parties. The directive is intended to update
the May 24, 1984 guidance 'CERCLA Enforcement Against
Bankrupt Parties' and the guidelines on bankruptcy contained
in the Cost Recovery Handbook 'Procedures for Document-
ing Costs for CERCLA Section 107 Actions,' January 30,
1985. The memorandum defines specific criteria for evaluat-
ing the merits of a potential bankruptcy referral; elaborates
on the policy regarding settlement with bankrupt parties; re-
views the recent judicial decisions in the areas of the auto-
matic stay, abandonment, discharge, and claims of adminis-
trative expenses; and briefly describes how new enforcement
theories which have been asserted by the Agency in recent
pleadings.
Specifications: Supersedes PB91-139022. 25p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
Hazardous materials, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
Response.
0600 Revised Policy on Discretionary Information
Release under CERCLA
Order Number PB93-963610CDH, price: PC A01/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 31 Mar 93
The memorandum revises OSWER Directive 9835.12, Re-
leasing Information to Potentially Responsible Parties of
CERCLA Sites, with the intention of streamlining and expedit-
ing the CERCLA settlement process.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. See also PB91-139469. 3p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
Potentially responsible parties.
0601 Revised Procedures for Implementing Off-Site
Response Actions
Order Number PB91-139287CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 13 Nov 87
The directive describes procedures that should be observed
when a response action under CERCLA or section 7003 of
RCRA involves the off-site treatment, storage, or disposal of
CERCLA waste. The directive supersedes directive no.
9300.2-5 'Procedures for Planning and Implementing Off-site
Response Actions,' directive no. 9330.2-6 'Eligibility of Facili-
ties in Assessment Monitoring,' and directive no. 9830.2-1
'Procedures for Planning and Implementing Off-site Re-
sponse Actions under CERCLA,' dated May 6, 1985.
Specifications: 25p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
Hazardous materials, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
Response.
0602 Revision of CERCLA Civil Judicial Settlement
Authorities under Delegations 14-13-B and 14-14-E
Order Number PB91-138818CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; 17 Jun 88
The directive implements revisions to the consultation and
concurrence requirements of the civil judicial settlement dele-
gations, which are designed to streamline the enforcement
process and help achieve Agency remedial action and cost
recovery goals. These revisions expand Regional authority to
approve CERCLA settlements. The directive supplements a
portion of directive No. 9012.10 'Redelegation of Authority
Under CERCLA and SARA,' dated May 25, 1988.
Specifications: 8p.
Subject index keywords: Refuse disposal, Penalties, Office
of Solid Waste and Emergency Response, Comprehensive
Environment Response Compensation and Liability Act.
0603 Revisions to the Interim Guidance on PRP
Participation in Remedial Investigations and Feasibility
Studies
Order Number PB91-139352CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 7 Feb 89
The directive sets forth policies and procedures governing
potentially responsible party participation in the remedial in-
vestigations and feasibility studies process, including initiation
of PRP searches, PRP notification, development of agree-
ments and oversight of RI/FS activities. The directive super-
sedes directive no. 9835.1 'Participation of PRPs in Develop-
ment of RIs and FSs under CERCLA' and directive no.
9355.3-01 'Guidance on RI/FS.'
Specifications: Portions of this document are not fully legi-
ble. 42p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
Hazardous materials, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
Response.
0604 Roles and Responsibilities of Regional Project
Officers and Headquarters Zone Project Officers for
Management of TES (TIES 50) Contracts
Order Number PB91-139758CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 3 Mar 89
The directive defines the roles and responsibilities of Region-
al Project Officers (RPO) and Headquarters Zone Project Of-
ficers (ZPO) managing and administering the Technical En-
forcement Support (TES) Contracts, six of which were award-
ed in the second quarter, FY89. These contracts are referred
to collectively as TES 5—. The directive no. 9871.0, dated
February 17, 1989, which describes duties and responsibil-
100
-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Enforcement
ities of Regional Project Officers and Work Assignment Man-
agers under TES 3 and 4 remains in effect with respect to
those contracts.
Specifications: See also PB91-139741. 26p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
Hazardous materials, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
Response.
0605 Scope of the CERCLA Petroleum Exclusion under
Sections 101(14) and 104(a)(2)
Order Number PB91-139550CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 31 Jul 87
The directive discusses whether contaminants in used oil or
any other petroleum substances are within the petroleum ex-
clusion.
Specifications: 15p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management
Hazardous materials, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
Response.
0606 Site Classification Changes from Enforcement to
Fund Lead
Order Number PB91-139600CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 5 May 87
The directive explains to the Regions the circumstances and
procedures to follow for changing National Priorities List site
classification from enforcement to Fund Lead. The directive
supplements directive no. 9200.3-1 'FY 1987 Superfund
SCAP Manual,' dated September 30, 1987.
Specifications: 7p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
Hazardous materials, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
Response.
0607 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
Frequency by Party Name Report
Order Number PB90-242868CDH, price: PC A06/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 2 Aug 90
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP). Data from this notice letter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
The data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number. SETS was
created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
ority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS does not address the
range of other administrative duties related to tracking the
PRP. These lists (updated quarterly) represent EPA's prelimi-
nary findings on the identities of potentially responsible par-
ties. Inclusion on these lists does not constitute a final deter-
mination concerning the liability of any party for the hazard or
contamination at any CERCLA site. The frequency listing is
arranged in the following manner. The number of sites asso-
ciated with the party is indicated in the site's column. The
first two characters of the site ID number constitute the state
abbreviation of the site location.
Specifications: 119p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste dis-
posal, Coordinated procurement, Site Enforcement Tracking
System, Superfund, Remedial action.
0608 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
Frequency by Party Name Report
Order Number PB91-130518CDH, price: PC A06/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 19 Dec 90
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP). Data from this notice letter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
This data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number. SETS was
created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
ority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS does not address the
range of other administrative duties related to tracking the
PRP.
Specifications: Supersedes PB90-242868. 123p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste dis-
posal, Coordinated procurement, Directories, Site Enforce-
ment Tracking System, Superfund, Remedial action, Poten-
tially responsible parties.
0609 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
Frequency by Party Name Report
Order Number PB91-170423CDH, price: PC A07/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 5 Apr 91
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issued a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP). Data from this notice letter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
This data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number. SETS was
created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
ority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS does not address the
range of other administrative duties related to tracking the
PRP. The frequency listing is arranged in the following
manner. The number of sites associated with the party is in-
dicated in the site's column. The first two characters of the
site ID number constitute the state abbreviation of the site
location.
Specifications: Supersedes PB91-130518. 142p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste dis-
posal, Superfund, Notification procedures, Directories, Site
Enforcement Tracking System, Potentially responsible par-
ties.
101
-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Enforcement
0610 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
Frequency by PRP Name Report, September 26, 1991
Order Number PB92-105345CDH, price: PC A08
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 26 Sep 91
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP). Data from the notice letter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
The data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number. SETS was
created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
ority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS does not address the
range of other administrtive duties related to tracking the
PRP. The frequency listing is arranged in the following
manner. The number of sites associated with the party is in-
dicated in the site's column. The first two characters of the
site ID number constitute the state abbreviation of the site
location,
Specifications: Supersedes PB91-215186. 170p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste disposal, Direc-
tories, Hazardous materials, Site Enforcement Tracking
System, Potentially responsible parties, US EPA Regions 1-
10.
0611 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS) (National)
Order Number PB90-591790CDH, price: Subscription, call for
price
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 31 Jul 90
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP). Data from this notice letter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
This data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number. SETS was
created by EPA to track PRP identification at both NPL (Na-
tional Priority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS does not ad-
dress the range of other administrative duties related to
tracking the PRP. These lists represent EPA's preliminary
findings on the identities of PRPs. Inclusion on these lists
does not constitute a final determination concerning the li-
ability of any party for the hazard or contamination at any
CERCLA site.
Specifications: Available in 9-track EBCDIC character set,
1600 bpi. Available on subscription, U.S., Canada and
Mexico price $880.00/year; all others $1760.00/year. Also
available on demand as PB90-591791, price T02 for either
1600 or 6250 bpi. Issued quarterly. System: IBM 3090; ESA
3.1.3 operating system. For system on diskette, see PB90-
591780.
Subject index keywords: Data file, Hazardous materials,
Superfund, Remedial action, Regional analysis, Waste man-
agement.
0612 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): National
Alphabetical Report by PRP Name, September 26, 1991
Order Number PB92-105360CDH, price: Call for price
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 26 Sep 91
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP). Data from the notice letter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
The data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number. SETS was
created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
ority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS does not address the
range of other administrative duties related to tracking the
PRP.
Specifications: Supersedes PB91-215160. 3746p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste dis-
posal, Superfund, Remedial action, Directories, Potentially re-
sponsible parties, Site Enforcement Tracking System.
0613 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS) (National)
(for Microcomputers)
Order Number PB90-591780CDH, price: Subscription, call for
price
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 31 Jul 90
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poteh-
tially responsible party (PRP). Data from this notice letter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
This data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number. SETS was
created by EPA to track PRP identification at both NPL (Na-
tional Priority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS does not ad-
dress the range of other administrative duties related to
tracking the PRP. These lists represent EPA's preliminary
findings on the identities of PRPs. Inclusion on these lists
does not constitute a final determination concerning the li-
ability of any party for the hazard or contamination at any
CERCLA site.
Specifications: The datafile is contained on twelve 1.2M, 5
1 /4 inch diskettes, high density. File format: ASCII. Available
on subscription, U.S., Canada and Mexico price $920.00/
year; price for others $1840.00/year. Also available on
demand as PB90-591781 for DOS. Issued quarterly. System:
IBM PC/AT; MS DOS 3.3 operating system, 640K. For
system on magnetic tape, see PB90-591790. 12 diskettes.
102
-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Enforcement
Subject index keywords: Data file, Hazardous materials,
Superfund, Remedial action, Regional analysis, Waste man-
agement.
0614 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): National
Frequency by PRP Name Report
Order Number PB92-173103CDH, price:
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; Apr 92
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
, tially responsible party (PRP). Data from the notice letter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
The data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number. SETS was
created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
orities List) and non-NPL sites. SETS does not address the
range of other administrative duties related to tracking the
PRP. These lists (updated quarterly) represent EPA's prelimi-
nary findings on the identities of potentially responsible par-
ties. The site report is designed to provide PRP information
linked by the associated site, which appears according to the
state where the site is located.
Specifications: Supersedes PB92-139526. 184p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Hazardous materials,
. Waste disposal, Coordinated procurement, Remedial action,
Directories, Site Enforcement Tracking System, Potentially
responsible parties.
0615 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): National
PRP Listing Alphabetically by PRP Name
Order Number PB92-173095CDH, price: Call for price
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; Apr 92
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
, controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP). Data from the notice letter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
The data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number. SETS was
created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
orities List) and non-NPL sites. SETS does not address the
range of other administrative duties related to tracking the
PRP. These lists (updated quarterly) represent EPA's prelimi-
nary findings on the identities of potentially responsible par-
ties. The site report is designed to provide PRP information
linked by the associated site, which appears according to the
state where the site is located.
Specifications: Supersedes PB92-139518. 4770p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Hazardous materials,
Waste disposal, Coordinated procurement, Remedial action,
Directories, Site Enforcement Tracking System, Potentially
responsible parties.
0616 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): National
PRP Listing Alphabetically by PRP Name
Order Number PB92-220136CDH, price: Call for price
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; Jul 92
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP). Data from the notice letter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
The data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number. SETS was
. created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
ority List) and non-NPL sites.
Specifications: Supersedes PB92-173095. 5158p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Financial
management, Law enforcement, Tracking, Superfund, Reme-
dial Action.
0617 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): National
PRP Listing by Site
Order Number PB92-173087CDH, price: Call for price
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; Apr 92
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP). Data from the notice letter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
The data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number. SETS was
created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
orities List) and non-NPL sites. SETS does not address the
range of other administrative duties related to tracking the
PRP. These lists (updated quarterly) represent EPA's prelimi-
nary findings on the identities of potentially responsible par-
ties. The site report is designed to provide PRP information
linked by the associated site, which appears according to the
state where-the site is located.
Specifications: Supersedes PB92-139500. 5215p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Hazardous materials,
Waste disposal, Coordinated procurement, Remedial action,
Directories, Site Enforcement Tracking System, Potentially
responsible parties.
0618 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): National
PRP Listing by Site
Order Number PB92-220128CDH, price: Call for price
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; Jul 92
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
103
-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Enforcement
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP). Data from the notice letter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
The data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number. SETS was
created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
orities List) and non-NPL sites. SETS does not address the
range of other administrative duties related to tracking the
PRP. The listing by site name is organized in the following
manner. Sites are sorted by state, as indicated in the site ID
number. The first two characters of the site ID number con-
stitute the state abbreviation of the site location. The listing
by party name is arranged alphabetically by the name of the
party and provides a company contact and address. Within
each record, the sites associated with the PRP are listed.
The first two characters of the site ID number constitute the
state abbreviation of the site location.
Specifications: Supersedes PB92-173087. 5611 p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Remedial action,
Waste disposal, Directories, Hazardous materials, Site En-
forcement Tracking System, Potentially responsible parties.
0619 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): National
PRP Report by Site, September 26,1991
Order Number PB92-105352CDH, price: Call for price
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 26 Sep 91
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP). Data from the notice letter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
The data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number. SETS was
created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
ority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS does not address the
range of other administrative duties related to tracking the
PRP. The site report is designed to provide PRP information
linked by the associated site, which appears according to the
state where the site is located.
Specifications: Supersedes PB91-215178. 3027p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste disposal, Direc-
tories, Hazardous materials, Site Enforcement Tracking
System, Potentially responsible parties, US EPA Regions 1-
10.
0620 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS) (National
- 3 1/2 Inch Diskette, IBM PS/2 Compatible) (for
Microcomputers)
Order Number PB92-592130CDH, price: Subscription, call for
price
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; Oct 91
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP). Data from the notice letter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
The data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number. SETS was
created by EPA to track PRP identification at both NPL (Na-
tional Priority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS does not ad-
dress the range of other administrative duties related to
tracking the PRP. These lists represent EPA's preliminary
findings on the identities of PRPs. Inclusion on these lists
does not constitute a final determination concerning the li-
ability of any party for the hazard or contamination at any
CERCLA site.
Specifications: Available on subscription, U.S., Canada, and
Mexico price $1,000; price for others $2,000. Issued quarter-
ly. The datafile is on ten, 3 1/2 inch diskettes, 1.44M high
density. File format: ASCII. Also available individually; order
number PB92-592131, price DOS. System: IBM PS/2; MS
DOS 3.3 operating system, 640K. Other formats available as
IBM (or compatible) 5 1/4 inch - PB90-591780. 10 diskettes.
Subject index keywords: Data file, Hazardous materials,
Waste disposal, Superfund, Remedial action, Directories, Site
Enforcement Tracking System, Potentially responsible par-
ties.
0621 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
Listing by Site for Alabama
Order Number PB90-243056CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 2 Aug 90
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP). Data from this notice letter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
The data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number. SETS was
created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
ority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS does not address the
range of other administrative duties related to tracking the
PRP. These lists (updated quarterly) represent EPA's prelimi-
nary findings on the identities of potentially responsible par-
ties. Inclusion on these lists does not constitute a final deter-
mination concerning the liability of any party for the hazard or
contamination at any CERCLA site. The site report is de-
signed to provide PRP information linked by the associated
site, which appears according to Alabama where the site is
located.
Specifications: Also available in set of 8 reports PC E99/
MF E99, PB90-243049. See also PB90-243064. 12p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Alabama,
Waste disposal, Coordinated procurement, Directories, Site
Enforcement Tracking System, Superfund, Remedial action.
104
-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION; Enforcement
0622 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
Listing by Site for Alabama
Order Number PB91-130708CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 19 Dec 90
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP) for the state of Alabama. Data
from this notice letter is used to form the Site Enforcement
Tracking System (SETS). This data includes PRP name and
address, a company contact person, the date the notice was
issued, and the related CERCLA site name and identification
number. SETS was created to track PRP identification at
both NPL (National Priority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS
does not address the range of other administrative duties re-
lated to tracking the PRP.
Specifications: Also available in set of 8 reports PC E99/
MF E99, PB91-130690. Supersedes PB90-243056. See also
PB91-131219. 11p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Alabama,
Waste disposal, Coordinated procurement, Directories, Site
Enforcement Tracking System, Superfund, Remedial action,
Potentially responsible parties.
0623 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
Listing by Site for Alabama
Order Number PB91-170613CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 5 Apr 91
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issued a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP). Data from this notice letter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
This data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number. SETS was
created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
ority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS does not address the
range of other administrative duties related to tracking the
PRP. The site report is designed to provide PRP information
linked by the associated site, which appears according to the
state where the site is located.
Specifications: Also available in set of 8 reports PC E99/
MF E99, PB91-170605. Supersedes PB91-130708. See also
PB91-170621. 13p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste dis-
posal, Superfund, Notification procedures, Directories, Ala-
bama, Site Enforcement Tracking System, Potentially respon-
sible parties.
0624 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
Listing by Site for American Samoa
.Order Number PB90-243395CDH, price: PC A01/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 2 Aug 90
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP). Data from this notice letter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
The data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number. SETS was
created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
ority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS does not address the
range of other administrative duties related to tracking the
PRP. These lists (updated quarterly) represent EPA's prelimi-
nary findings on the identities of potentially responsible par-
ties. Inclusion on these lists does not constitute a final deter-
mination concerning the liability of any party for the hazard or
contamination at any CERCLA site. The site report is de-
signed to provide PRP information linked by the associated
site, which appears according to American Samoa where the
site is located.
Specifications: Also available in set of 6 reports PC E99/
MF E99, PB90-243387. See also PB90-243403. 5p.
Subject: index keywords: Hazardous materials, American
Samoa, Waste disposal, Coordinated procurement, Directo-
ries, Site Enforcement Tracking System, Superfund, Remedi-
al action.
0625 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
Listing by Site for American Samoa
Order Number PB91-131086CDH, price: PC A01/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 19 Dec 90
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP) for American Samoa. Data from
this notice letter is used to form the Site Enforcement Track-
ing System (SETS). This data includes PRP name and ad-
dress, a company contact person, the date the notice was
issued, and the related CERCLA site name and identification
number. SETS was created to track PRP identification at
both NPL (National Priority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS
does not address the range of other administrative duties re-
lated to tracking the PRP.
Specifications: Also available in set of 6 reports PC E99/
MF E99, PB91-131078. Supersedes PB90-243395. See also
PB91-131094. 4p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste dis-
posal, Coordinated procurement, Directories, Site Enforce-
ment Tracking System, Superfund, Remedial action, Poten-
tially responsible parties.
105
-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Enforcement
0626 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
Listing by Site for American Samoa
Order Number PB91-170951CDH, price: PC A01/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 5 Apr 91
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issued a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP). Data from this notice letter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
This data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number. SETS was
created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
ority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS does not address the
range of other administrative duties related to tracking the
PRP. The site report is designed to provide PRP information
linked by the associated site, which appears according to the
state where the site is located.
Specifications: Also available in set of 6 reports PC E99/
MF E99, PB91-170944. Supersedes PB91-131086. See also
PB91-170969. 5p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste dis-
posal, Superfund, Notification procedures, Directories, Ameri-
can Samoa, Site Enforcement Tracking System, Potentially
responsible parties.
0627 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
Listing by Site for Arizona
Order Number PB90-243403CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 2 Aug 90
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP). Data from this notice letter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
The data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number. SETS was
created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
ority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS does not address the
range of other administrative duties related to tracking the
PRP. These lists (updated quarterly) represent EPA's prelimi-
nary findings on the identities of potentially responsible par-
ties. Inclusion on these lists does not constitute a final deter-
mination concerning the liability of any party for the hazard or
contamination at any CERCLA site. The site report is de-
signed to provide PRP information linked by the associated
site, which appears according to Arizona where the site is lo-
cated.
Specifications: Also available in set of 6 reports PC E99/
MF E99, PB90-243387. See also PB90-243395 and PB90-
243411. 16p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Arizona,
Waste disposal, Coordinated procurement, Directories, Site
Enforcement Tracking System, Superfund, Remedial action.
0628 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
Listing by Site for Arizona
Order Number PB91-131094CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 19 Dec 90
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP) for the state of Arizona. Data
from this notice letter is used to form the Site Enforcement
Tracking System (SETS). This data includes PRP name and
address, a company contact person, the date the notice was
issued, and the related CERCLA site name and identification
number. SETS was created to track PRP identification at
both NPL (National Priority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS
does not address the range of other administrative duties re-
lated to tracking the PRP.
Specifications: Also available in set of 6 reports PC E99/
MF E99, PB91-131078. Supersedes PB90-243403. See also
PB91-131086 and PB91-131102. 19p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Arizona,
Waste disposal, Coordinated procurement, Directories, Site
Enforcement Tracking System, Superfund, Remedial action,
Potentially responsible parties.
0629 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
Listing by Site for Arizona
Order Number PB91-170969CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 5 Apr 91
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issued a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP). Data from this notice letter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
This data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number. SETS was
created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
ority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS does not address the
range of other administrative duties related to tracking the
PRP. The site report is designed to provide PRP information
linked by the associated site, which appears according to the
state where the site is located.
Specifications: Also available in set of 6 reports PC E99/
MF E99, PB91-170944. Supersedes PB91-131094. See also
PB91-170951 and PB91-170977. 24p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste dis-
posal, Superfund, Notification procedures, Directories, Arizo-
na, Site Enforcement Tracking System, Potentially responsi-
ble parties.
106
-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Enforcement
0630 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
Listing by Site for Arkansas
Order Number PB90-243213CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 2 Aug 90
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP). Data from this notice letter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
The data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number. SETS was
created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
ority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS does not address the
range of other administrative duties related to tracking the
PRP. These lists (updated quarterly) represent EPA's prelimi-
nary findings on the identities of potentially responsible par-
ties. Inclusion on these lists does not constitute a final deter-
mination concerning the liability of any party for the hazard or
contamination at any CERCLA site. The site report is de-
signed to provide PRP information linked by the associated
site, which appears according to Arkansas where the site is
located.
Specifications: Also available in set of 5 reports PC E99/
MF E99, PB90-243205. See also PB90-243221. 16p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Arkansas,
Waste disposal, Coordinated procurement, Directories, Site
Enforcement Tracking System, Superfund, Remedial action.
0631 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
Listing by Site for Arkansas
Order Number PB91-130906CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 19 Dec 90
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the 'poten-
tially responsible party (PRP) for the state of Arkansas. Data
from this notice letter is used to form the Site Enforcement
Tracking System (SETS). This data includes PRP name and
address, a company contact person, the date the notice was
issued, and the related CERCLA site name and identification
number. SETS was created to track PRP identification at
both NPL (National Priority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS
does not address the range of other administrative duties re-
lated to tracking the PRP.
Specifications: Also available in set of 5 reports PC E99/
MF E99, PB91-130898. Supersedes PB90-243213. See also
PB91-130914. 16p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Arkansas,
Waste disposal, Coordinated procurement, Directories, Site
Enforcement Tracking System, Superfund, Remedial action,
Potentially responsible parties.
0632 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
Listing by Site for Arkansas
Order Number PB91-170779CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 5 Apr 91
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issued a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP). Data from this notice letter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
This data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number. SETS was
created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
ority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS does not address the
range of other administrative duties related to tracking the
PRP. The site report is designed to provide PRP information
linked by the associated site, which appears according to the
state where the site is located.
Specifications: Also available in set of 5 reports PC E99/
MF E99, PB91-170761. Supersedes PB91-130906. See also
PB91-170787. 17p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste dis-
posal, Superfund, Notification procedures, Directories, Arkan-
sas, Site Enforcement Tracking System, Potentially responsi-
ble parlies.
0633 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
Listing by Site for California
Order Number PB90-243411CDH, price: PC A07/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 2 Aug 90
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP). Data from this notice letter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
The data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number. SETS was
created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
ority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS does not address the
range of other administrative duties related to tracking the
PRP. These lists (updated quarterly) represent EPA's prelimi-
nary findings on the identities of potentially responsible par-
ties. Inclusion on these lists does not constitute a final deter-
mination concerning the liability of any party for the hazard or
contamination at any CERCLA site. The site report is de-
signed to provide PRP information linked by the associated
site, which appears according to California where the site is
located.
Specifications: Also available in set of 6 reports PC E99/
MF E99, PB90-243387. See also PB90-243403 and PB90-
243429. 126p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, California,
Waste disposal, Coordinated procurement, Directories, Site
Enforcement Tracking System, Superfund, Remedial action.
107
-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Enforcement
0634 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
Listing by Site for California
Order Number PB91-131102CDH, price: PC A08/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 19 Dec 90
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP) for the state of California. Data
from this notice letter is used to form the Site Enforcement
Tracking System (SETS). This data includes PRP name and
address, a company contact person, the date the notice was
issued, and the related CERCLA site name and identification
number. SETS was created to track PRP identification at
both NPL (National Priority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS
does not address the range of other administrative duties re-
lated to tracking the PRP.
Specifications: Also available in set of 6 reports PC E99/
MF E99, PB91-131078. Supersedes PB90-243411. See also
PB91-131094and PB91-131110. 157p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, California,
Waste disposal, Coordinated procurement, Directories, Site
Enforcement Tracking System, Superfund, Remedial action,
Potentially responsible parties.
0635 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
Listing by Site for California
Order Number PB91:170977CDH, price: PC A10/MF A02
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 5 Apr 91
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issued a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP). Data from this notice letter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
This data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number. SETS was
created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
ority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS does not address the
range of other administrative duties related to tracking the
PRP. The site report is designed to provide PRP information
linked by the associated site, which appears according to the
state where the site is located.
Specifications: Also available in set of 6 reports PC E99/
MF E99, 1=891-170944. Supersedes PB91-131102. See also
PB91-170969 and PB91-170985. 21 Op.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste dis-
posal, Superfund, Notification procedures, Directories, Cali-
fornia, Site Enforcement Tracking System, Potentially respon-
sible parties.
0636 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
Listing by Site for Colorado
Order Number PB90-243320CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 2 Aug 90
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP). Data from this notice letter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
The data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number. SETS was
created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
ority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS does not address the
range of other administrative duties related to tracking the
PRP. These lists (updated quarterly) represent EPA's prelimi-
nary findings on the identities of potentially responsible par-
ties. Inclusion on these lists does not constitute a final deter-
mination concerning the liability of any party for the hazard or
contamination at any CERCLA site. The site report is de-
signed to provide PRP information linked by the associated
site, which appears according to Colorado where the site is
located.
Specifications: Also available in set of 6 reports PC E99/
MF E99, PB90-243312. See also PB90-243338. 65p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste dis-
posal, Colorado, Coordinated procurement, Directories, Site
Enforcement Tracking System, Superfund, Remedial action.
0637 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
Listing by Site for Colorado
Order Number PB91-131011CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 19 Dec 90
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP) for the state of Colorado. Data
from this notice letter is used to form the Site Enforcement
Tracking System (SETS). This data includes PRP name and
address, a company contact person, the date the notice was
issued, and the related CERCLA site name and identification
number. SETS was created to track PRP identification at
both NPL (National Priority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS
does not address the range of other administrative duties re-
lated to tracking the PRP.
Specifications: Also available in set of 6 reports PC E99/
MF E99, PB91-131003. Supersedes PB90-243320. See also
PB91-131029. 65p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Colorado,
Waste disposal, Coordinated procurement, Directories, Site
Enforcement Tracking System, Superfund, Remedial action,
Potentially responsible parties.
108
-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Enforcement
0638 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
Listing by Site for Colorado
Order Number PB91-170886CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 5 Apr 91
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issued a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP). Data from this notice letter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
This data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number. SETS was
created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
ority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS does not address the
range of other administrative duties related to tracking the
PRP. The site report is designed to provide PRP information
linked by the associated site, which appears according to the
state where the site is located.
Specifications: Also available in set of 6 reports PC E99/
MF E99, PB91-170878. Supersedes PB91-131011. See also
PB91-170894. 68p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste dis-
posal, Superfund, Notification procedures, Directories, Colo-
rado, Site Enforcement Tracking System, Potentially respon-
sible parties.
0639 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
Listing by Site for Connecticut
Order Number PB90-242884CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 2 Aug 90
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP). Data from this notice letter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
The data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number. SETS was
created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
ority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS does not address the
range of other administrative duties related to tracking the
PRP. These lists (updated quarterly) represent EPA's prelimi-
nary findings on the identities of potentially responsible par-
ties. Inclusion on these lists does not constitute a final deter-
mination concerning the liability of any party for the hazard or
contamination at any CERCLA site. The site report is de-
signed to provide PRP information linked by the associated
site, which appears according to Connecticut where the site
is located.
Specifications: Also available in set of 6 reports PC E99/
MF E99, PB90-242876. See also PB90-242892. 31 p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Connecticut,
Waste disposal, Coordinated procurement, Directories, Site
Enforcement Tracking System, Superfund, Remedial action.
0640 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
Listing by Site for Connecticut
Order Number PB91-130534CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 19 Dec 90
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP) for the state of Connecticut.
Data from this notice letter is used to form the Site Enforce-
ment Tracking System (SETS). This data includes PRP name
and address, a company contact person, the date the notice
was issued, and the related CERCLA site name and identifi-
cation number. SETS was created to track PRP identification
at both NPL (National Priority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS
does not address the range of other administrative duties re-
lated to tracking the PRP.
Specifications: Also available in set of 6 reports PC E99/
MF E99, PB91-130526. Supersedes PB90-242884. See also
PB91-130542. 30p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Connecticut,
Waste disposal, Coordinated procurement, Directories, Site
Enforcement Tracking System, Superfund, Remedial action,
Potentially responsible parties.
0641 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
Listing by Site for Connecticut
Order Number PB91-170449CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 5 Apr 91
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issued a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP). Data from this notice letter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
This data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number. SETS was
created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
ority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS does not address the
range of other administrative duties related to tracking the
PRP. The site report is designed to provide PRP information
linked by the associated site, which appears according to the
state where the site is located.
Specifications: Also available in set of 6 reports PC E99/
MF E99, PB91-170431. Supersedes PB91-130534. See also
PB91-170456. 32p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste dis-
posal, Superfund, Notification procedures, Directories, Con-
necticut, Site Enforcement Tracking System, Potentially re-
sponsible parties.
109
-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Enforcement
0642 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
Listing by Site for Delaware
Order Number PB90-242991CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 2 Aug 90
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP). Data from this notice letter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
The data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number. SETS was
created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
ority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS does not address the
range of other administrative duties related to tracking the
PRP. These lists (updated quarterly) represent EPA's prelimi-
nary findings on the identities of potentially responsible par-
ties. Inclusion on these lists does not constitute a final deter-
mination concerning the liability of any party for the hazard or
contamination at any CERCLA site. The site report is de-
signed to provide PRP information linked by the associated
site, which appears according to Delaware where the site is
located.
Specifications: Also available in set of 5 reports PC E99/
MF E99, PB90-242983. See also PB90-243007. 28p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Delaware,
Waste disposal, Coordinated procurement, Directories, Site
Enforcement Tracking System, Superfund, Remedial action.
0643 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
Listing by Site for Delaware
Order Number PB91-130641CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 19 Dec 90
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP) for the state of Delaware. Data
from this notice letter is used to form the Site Enforcement
Tracking System (SETS). This data includes PRP name and
address, a company contact person, the date the notice was
issued, and the related CERCLA site name and identification
number. SETS was created to track PRP identification at
both NPL (National Priority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS
does not address the range of other administrative duties re-
lated to tracking the PRP.
Specifications: Also available in set of 5 reports PC E99/
MF E99, PB91-130633. Supersedes PB90-242991. See also
PB91-130658. 26p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Delaware,
Waste disposal, Coordinated procurement, Directories, Site
Enforcement Tracking System, Superfund, Remedial action,
Potentially responsible parties.
0644 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
Listing by Site for Delaware
Order Number PB91-170555CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 5 Apr 91
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issued a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP). Data from this notice letter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
This data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number. SETS was
created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
ority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS does not address the
range of other administrative duties related to tracking the
PRP. The site report is designed to provide PRP information
linked by the associated site, which appears according to the
state where the site is located.
Specifications: Also available in set of 5 reports PC E99/
MF E99, PB91-170548. Supersedes PB91-130641. See also
PB91-170563. 33p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste dis-
posal, Superfund, Notification procedures, Directories, Dela-
ware, Site Enforcement Tracking System, Potentially respon-
sible parties.
0645 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
Listing by Site for Florida
Order Number PB90-243064CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 2 Aug 90
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP). Data from this notice letter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
The data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number. SETS was
created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
ority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS does not address the
range of other administrative duties related to tracking the
PRP. These lists (updated quarterly) represent EPA's prelimi-
nary findings on the identities of potentially responsible par-
ties. Inclusion on these lists does not constitute a final deter-
mination concerning the liability of any party for the hazard or
contamination at any CERCLA site. The site report is de-
signed to provide PRP information linked by the associated
site, which appears according to Florida where the site is lo-
cated.
Specifications: Also available in set of 8 reports PC E99/
MF E99, PB90-243049. See also PB90-243056 and PB90-
243072. 37p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Florida,
Waste disposal, Coordinated procurement, Directories, Site
Enforcement Tracking System, Superfund, Remedial action.
110
-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Enforcement
0646 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
Listing by Site for Florida
Order Number PB91-131219CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 19 Dec 90
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP) for the state of Florida. Data
from this notice letter is used to form the Site Enforcement
Tracking System (SETS). This data includes PRP name and
address, a company contact person, the date the notice was
issued, and the related CERCLA site name and identification
number. SETS was created to track PRP identification at
both NPL (National Priority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS
does not address the range of other administrative duties re-
lated to tracking the PRP.
Specifications: Also available in set of 8 reports PC E99/
MF E99, PB91-130690. Supersedes PB90-243064. See also
PB91-130708 and PB91-130716. 39p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Florida,
Waste disposal, Coordinated procurement, Directories, Site
Enforcement Tracking System, Superfund,' Remedial action,
Potentially responsible parties.
0647 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
Listing by Site for Florida
Order Number PB91-170621CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 5 Apr 91
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issued a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP). Data from this notice letter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
This data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number. SETS was
created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
ority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS does not address the
range of other administrative duties related to tracking the
PRP. The site report is designed to provide PRP information
linked by the associated site, which appears according to the
state where the site is located.
Specifications: Also available in set of 8 reports PC E99/
MF E99, PB91-170605. Supersedes PB91-131219. See also
PB91 -170613 and PB91 -170639. 47p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste dis-
posal, Superfund, Notification procedures, Directories, Flori-
da, Site Enforcement Tracking System, Potentially responsi-
ble parties.
0648 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
Listing by Site for Georgia
Order Number PB90-243072CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 2 Aug 90
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP). Data from this notice letter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
The data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number. SETS was
created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
ority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS does not address the
range of other administrative duties related to tracking the
PRP. These lists (updated quarterly) represent EPA's prelimi-
nary findings on the identities of potentially responsible par-
ties. Inclusion on these lists does not constitute a final deter-
mination concerning the liability of any party for the hazard or
contamination at any CERCLA site. The site report is de-
signed to provide PRP information linked by the associated
site, which appears according to Georgia where the site is lo-
cated.
Specifications: Also available in set of 8 reports PC E99/
MF E99, PB90-243049. See also PB90-243064 and PB90-
243080. 19p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Georgia,
Waste disposal, Coordinated procurement, Directories, Site
Enforcement Tracking System, Superfund, Remedial action.
0649 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
Listing by Site for Georgia
Order Number PB91-130716CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 19 Dec 90
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP) for the state of Georgia. Data
from this notice letter is used to form the Site Enforcement
Tracking System (SETS). This data includes PRP name and
address, a company contact person, the date the notice was
issued, and the related CERCLA site,name and identification
number. SETS was created to track PRP identification at
both NPL (National Priority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS
does not address the range of other administrative duties re-
lated to tracking the PRP.
Specifications: Also available in set of 8 reports PC E99/
MF E99, PB91-130690. Supersedes PB90-243072. See also
PB91-131219 and PB91-130724. 17p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Georgia,
Waste disposal, Coordinated procurement, Directories, Site
Enforcement Tracking System, Superfund, Remedial action,
Potentially responsible parties.
111
-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Enforcement
0650 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
Listing by Site for Georgia
Order Number PB91-170639CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 5 Apr 91
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issued a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP). Data from this notice letter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
This data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number. SETS was
created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
ority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS does not address the
range of other administrative duties related to tracking the
PRP. The site report is designed to provide PRP information
linked by the associated site, which appears according to the
state where the site is located.
Specifications: Also available in set of 8 reports PC E99/
MF E99, PB91-170605. Supersedes PB91-130716. See also
PB91-170621 and PB91-170647. 20p.
Subject Index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste dis-
posal, Superfund, Notification procedures, Directories, Geor-
gia, Site Enforcement Tracking System, Potentially responsi-
ble parties.
0651 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
Listing by Site for Idaho
Order Number PB90-243460CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 2 Aug 90
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP). Data from this notice letter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
The data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number. SETS was
created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
ority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS does not address the
range of other administrative duties related to tracking the
PRP. These lists (updated quarterly) represent EPA's prelimi-
nary findings on the identities of potentially responsible par-
ties. Inclusion on these lists does not constitute a final deter-
mination concerning the liability of any party for the hazard or
contamination at any CERCLA site. The site report is de-
signed to provide PRP information linked by the associated
site, which appears according to Idaho where the site is lo-
cated.
Specifications: Also available in set of 3 reports, PC E99/
MF E99, PB90-243452. See also PB90-243478. 7p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Idaho,
Waste disposal, Coordinated procurement, Directories, Site
Enforcement Tracking System, Superfund, Remedial action.
0652 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
Listing by Site for Idaho
Order Number PB91-131151CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 19 Dec 90
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP) for the state of Idaho. Data
from this notice letter is used to form the Site Enforcement
Tracking System (SETS). This data includes PRP name and
address, a company contact person, the date the notice was
issued, and the related CERCLA site name and identification
number. SETS was created to track PRP identification at
both NPL (National Priority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS
does not address the range of other administrative duties re-
lated to tracking the PRP.
Specifications: Also available in set of 3 reports PC E99/
MF E99, PB91-131144. Supersedes PB90-243460. See also
PB91-131177. 8p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Idaho,
Waste disposal, Coordinated procurement, Directories, Site
Enforcement Tracking System, Superfund, Remedial action,
Potentially responsible parties.
0653 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
Listing by Site for Idaho
Order Number PB91-171025CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 5 Apr 91
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issued a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP). Data from this notice letter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
This data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number. SETS was
created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
ority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS does not address the
range of other administrative duties related to tracking the
PRP. The site report is designed to provide PRP information
linked by the associated site, which appears according to the
state where the site is located.
Specifications: Also available in set of 3 reports PC E99/
MF E99, PB91-171017. Supersedes PB91-131151. See also
PB91-171033. 10p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste dis-
posal, Superfund, Notification procedures, Directories, Idaho,
Site Enforcement Tracking System, Potentially responsible
parties.
112
-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Enforcement
0654 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
Listing by Site for Illinois
Order Number PB90-243148CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 2 Aug 90
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) srte, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
u?" *° f, hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP). Data from this notice letter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)
The data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
^£?rf0n' the date the notice was issued. and the related
OfcRCLA site name and identification number. SETS was
created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
ority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS does not address the
LnDe-ru ,er administrative duties related to tracking the
PRP. These lists (updated quarterly) represent EPA's prelimi-
nary findings on the identities of potentially responsible par-
ties. Inclusion on these lists does not constitute a final deter-
mination concerning the liability of any party for the hazard or
contamination at any CERCLA site. The site report is de-
signed to provide PRP information linked by the associated
site which appears according to Illinois where the site is lo-
cated.
noS: Als° available in set of 6 reports PC E99/
MF E99, PB90-243130. See also PB90-243155. 57p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Illinois,
Waste disposal, Coordinated procurement, Directories, Site
tnforcement Tracking System, Superfund, Remedial action.
0655 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
Listing by Site for Illinois
Order Number PB91-1 30781 CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 19 Dec 90
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
S? I° f, nazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP) for the state of Illinois Data
from this notice letter is used to form the Site Enforcement
Tracking System (SETS). This data includes PRP name and
address, a company contact person, the date the notice was
issued, and the related CERCLA site name and identification
£!£ MD, ^TS W3S Created to track PRP identification at
both NPL (National Priority List) and non-NPL sites SETS
does not address the range of other administrative duties re-
lated to tracking the PRP.
Specifications: Also available in set of 6 reports PC E99/
PRO, ,o PB91'130773- Supersedes PB90-243148. See also
* DX?! -\ 30/99. 56p.
u^l60*,- index keywords: Hazardous materials, Illinois,
Waste disposal, Coordinated procurement, Directories Site
Enforcement Tracking System, Superfund, Remedial action,
Potentially responsible parties.
0656 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)- PRP
Listing by Site for Illinois
Order Number PB91-170704CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 5 Apr 91
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issued a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP). Data from this notice letter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)
This data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number. SETS was
created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
ority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS does not address the
range of other administrative duties related to tracking the
PRP. The site report is designed to provide PRP information
linked by the associated site, which appears according to the
state where the site is located.
Specifications: Also available in set of 6 reports PC E99/
MF E99, PB91-170696. Supersedes PB91-130781 See also
PB91-170712. 59p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste dis-
posal, Superfund, Notification procedures, Directories, Illinois
Site Enforcement Tracking System, Potentially responsible
parties.
0657 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)- PRP
Listing by Site for Indiana
Order Number PB90-243155CDH, price: PC A07/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 2 Aug 90
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP). Data from this notice letter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)
The data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number. SETS was
created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
ority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS does not address the
range of other administrative duties related to tracking the
PRP. These lists (updated quarterly) represent EPA's prelimi-
nary findings on the identities of potentially responsible par-
ties. Inclusion on these lists does not constitute a final deter-
mination concerning the liability of any party for the hazard or
contamination at any CERCLA site. The site report is de-
signed to provide PRP information linked by the associated
site, which appears according to Indiana where the site is lo-
cated.
Specifications: Also available in set of 6 reports PC E99/
MF E99, PB90-243130. See also PB90-243148 and PB90-
243163. 137p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Indiana,
Waste disposal, Coordinated procurement, Directories Site
Enforcement Tracking System, Superfund, Remedial action
113
-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Enforcement
0658 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
Listing by Site for Indiana
Order Number PB91-130799CDH, price: PC A07/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 19 Dec 90
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP) for the state of Indiana. Data
from this notice letter is used to form the Site Enforcement
Tracking System (SETS). This data includes PRP name and
address, a company contact person, the date the notice was
issued, and the related CERCLA site name and identification
number. SETS was created to track PRP identification at
both NPL (National Priority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS
does not address the range of other administrative duties re-
lated to tracking the PRP.
Specifications: Also available in set of 6 reports PC E99/
MF E99, PB91-130773. Supersedes PB90-243155. See also
PB91-130781 and PB91-130807. 137p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Indiana,
Waste disposal, Coordinated procurement, Directories, Site
Enforcement Tracking System, Superfund, Remedial action,
Potentially responsible parties.
0659 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
Listing by Site for Indiana
Order Number PB91-170712CDH, price: PC A07/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 5 Apr 91
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issued a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP). Data from this notice letter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
This data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number. SETS was
created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
ority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS does not address the
range of other administrative duties related to tracking the
PRP. The site report is designed to provide PRP information
linked by the associated site, which appears according to the
state where the site is located.
Specifications: Also available in set of 6 reports PC E99/
MF E99, PB91-170696. Supersedes PB91-130799. See also
PB91-170704 and PB91-170720.140p.
Subject Index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste dis-
posal, Superfund, Notification procedures, Directories, Indi-
ana, Site Enforcement Tracking System, Potentially responsi-
ble parties.
0660 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
Listing by Site for Iowa
Order Number PB90-243270CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 2 Aug 90
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP). Data from this notice letter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETb).
The data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number. SETb was
created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
ority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS does not address he
range of other administrative duties related to tracking the
PRP These lists (updated quarterly) represent EPA's prelimi-
nary findings on the identities of potentially responsible par-
ties Inclusion on these lists does not constitute a final deter-
mination concerning the liability of any party for the hazard or
contamination at any CERCLA site. The site report is de-
signed to provide PRP information linked by the associated
site, which appears according to Iowa where the site is locat-
ed.'
Specifications: Also available in set of 4 reports PC E99/
MF E99, PB90-243262. See also PB90-243288. 25p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste dis-
posal Iowa, Coordinated procurement, Directories, Site En-
forcement Tracking System, Superfund, Remedial action.
0661 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
Listing by Site for Iowa Ano/MC Am
Order Number PB91-130963CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 19 Dec 90
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP) for the state of Iowa. Data from
this notice letter is used to form the Site Enforcement Track-
ing System (SETS). This data includes PRP name and ad-
dress, a company contact person, the date the notice was
issued, and the related CERCLA site name and identification
number. SETS was created to track PRP identification at
both NPL (National Priority List) and non-NPL sites. SETb
does not address the range of other administrative duties re-
lated to tracking the PRP.
Specifications: Also available in set of 4 reports PC E99/
MF E99, PB91-130955. Supersedes PB90-243270. See also
PB91-130971. 23p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Iowa, Waste
disposal, Coordinated procurement, Directories, Site Enforce-
ment Tracking System, Superfund, Remedial action, Poten-
tially responsible parties.
114
-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Enforcement
System (SETS): PRP
Order Number PB91-170837CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Was rpTnl pefCti°n AS6™* Washington, DC. Office of
waste Programs Enforcement; 5 Apr 91
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
VlrEPAmtaltReSPH0nSe' C°mPensat^ aid SL
r A ™St conduct a search to identify parties
h ?fnCial resP°nsibility for remediation of un-
hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issued a notice letter to the Doten
sld tXrm'tt SW* °ata fr°m this ^e^l
TW- t , f Slte Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)
This data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
caER£?ASOrVhe date the n°tice was issued' anSe related
nrno * * , ,na,me and identification number. SETS was
created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Prf
ority L.st) and non-NPL sites. SETS does not address the
paRTT°hfp0t?er administrative duties related to S£g X
bv th?3rPO!ltIS^eSigned t0 provide pRP information
.
Also Bailable in set of 4 reports PC
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste dis-
Sto FnfUPerfUnd; Notification procedures, Directories Iowa
parties m aCking System' Potentially responsible
0663 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
Listing by Site for Kansas v=>**9). rnr
Order Number PB90-243288CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 2 Aug 90
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre
faTZn 5tnV'rcSTental ResP°nse> Compensation and Liabil-
•th t •' I must c°nduct a search to identify parties
rnntmi?^ h financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten
3 to lorm'th^ SW^ °ata from this notice le«er is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)
The data includes PRP name and address a company con-
PFRrfT °n- date the notice was issued, and the related
™l", IT* * .Pame and identification number. SETS was
created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National^
ority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS does not address the
pappeTh °* ,ert adm|nistrative duties related to tracking the
PRP. These lists (updated quarterly) represent EPA's prelimi-
nary findings on the identities nf nnu>nti<,ii., ,. :,_,_ _
f/,ce c'nnao°ns: Also available in set of 4 reports PC E99/
^43296 "
k;?yvTds: Hazardous materials, Waste dis-
Enn t T C°ordinated procurement, Directories, Site
Enforcement Tracking System, Superfund, Remedial action
0664 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
Listing by Site for Kansas
Order Number PB91-130971CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 19 Dec 90
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP) for the state of Kansas. Data
from this notice letter is used to form the Site Enforcement
Tracking System (SETS). This data includes PRP name and
address, a company contact person, the date the notice was
issued, and the related CERCLA site name and identification
nTbMn,S^TS W3S created to track PRP identification at
both NPL (National Priority List) and non-NPL sites SETS
does not address the range of other administrative duties re-
lated to tracking the PRP.
Specifications: Also available in set of 4 reports PC E99/
MF E99, PB91-130955. Supersedes PB90-243288 See also
PB91-130963 and PB91-130989. 31 p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Kansas
Waste disposal, Coordinated procurement, Directories Site
Enforcement Tracking System, Superfund, Remedial action
Potentially responsible parties.
0665 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)- PRP
Listing by Site for Kansas
Order Number PB91-170845CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 5 Apr 91
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issued a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP). Data from this notice letter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)
This data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
t?ct person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number. SETS was
created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
ority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS does not address the
range of other administrative duties related to tracking the
PRP. The site report is designed to provide PRP information
linked by the associated site, which appears according to the
state where the site is located.
Specifications: Also available in set of 4 reports PC E99/
MF E99, PB91-170829. Supersedes PB91 -130971. See also
PB91-170837 and PB91-170852. 34p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste dis-
posal, Superfund, Notification procedures, Directories
Kansas, Site Enforcement Tracking System, Potentially re-
sponsible parties.
115
-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Enforcement
0666 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
Listing by Site for Kentucky
Order Number PB90-243080CDH, price: PC A05/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 2 Aug 90
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP). Data from this notice letter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
The data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number. SETS was
created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
ority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS does not address the
range of other administrative duties related to tracking the
PRP. These lists (updated quarterly) represent EPA's prelimi-
nary findings on the identities of potentially responsible par-
ties. Inclusion on these lists does not constitute a final deter-
mination concerning the liability of any party for the hazard or
contamination at any CERCLA site. The site report is de-
signed to provide PRP information linked by the associated
site, which appears according to Kentucky where the site is
located.
Specifications: Also available in set of 8 reports PC E99/
MF E99, PB90-243049. See also PB90-243072 and PB90-
243098. 97p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Kentucky,
Waste disposal, Coordinated procurement, Directories, Site
Enforcement Tracking System, Superfund, Remedial action.
0667 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
Listing by Site for Kentucky
Order Number PB91-130724CDH, price: PC A05/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 19 Dec 90
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP) for the state of Kentucky. Data
from this notice letter is used to form the Site Enforcement
Tracking System (SETS). This data includes PRP name and
address, a company contact person, the date the notice was
issued, and the related CERCLA site name and identification
number. SETS was created to track PRP identification at
both NPL (National Priority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS
does not address the range of other administrative duties re-
lated to tracking the PRP.
Specifications: Also available in set of 8 reports PC E99/
MF E99, PB91-130690. Supersedes PB90-243098. See also
PB91-130716 and PB91-130732. 97p.
Subject Index keywords: Hazardous materials, Kentucky,
Waste disposal, Coordinated procurement, Directories, Site
Enforcement Tracking System, Superfund, Remedial action,
Potentially responsible parties.
0668 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
Listing by Site for Kentucky
Order Number PB91 -170647CDH, price: PC A05/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 5 Apr 91
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issued a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP). Data from this notice letter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
This data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number. SETS was
created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
ority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS does not address the
range of other administrative duties related to tracking the
PRP The site report is designed to provide PRP information
linked by the associated site, which appears according to the
state where the site is located.
Specifications: Also available in set of 8 reports PC E99/
MF E99 PB91 -170605. Supersedes PB91-130724. See also
PB91-170639 and PB91-170732. 99p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste dis-
posal Superfund, Notification procedures, Directories, Ken-
tucky, Site Enforcement Tracking System, Potentially respon-
sible parties.
0669 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
Listing by Site for Louisiana
Order Number PB90-243221CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 2 Aug 90
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP). Data from this notice etter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SET&).
The data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number. SETS was
created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
ority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS does not address the
range of other administrative duties related to tracking the
PRp These lists (updated quarterly) represent EPA s prelimi-
nary findings on the identities of potentially responsible par-
ties Inclusion on these lists does not constitute a final deter-
mination concerning the liability of any party for the hazard or
contamination at any CERCLA site. The site report is de-
signed to provide PRP information linked by the associated
site, which appears according to Louisiana where the site is
located.
Specifications: Also available in set of 5 reports PC ESS/
MF E99, PB90-243205. See also PB90-243213 and PB90-
243239. 26p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Louisiana,
Waste disposal, Coordinated procurement, Directories, Site
Enforcement Tracking System, Superfund, Remedial action.
116
-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Enforcement
0670 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
Listing by Site for Louisiana
Order Number PB91-130914CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
wSSf' PfpT tl0n AgenCy' Washington, DC. Office of
waste Programs Enforcement; 19 Dec 90
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
itv ATtt SnpV'pSTental ReSP°nSe' ComP^ation and Liabil-
2th nV*' , f mUSt Conduct a search to ide"«fy parties
^ntrni? H^1 ^ ndal "^Po™"* for remediation of un-
S o M hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
f om thr"? le,P»rty .(PRP) f°r the State of Louisiana' Date
from his notice letter is used to form the Site Enforcement
Trackmg System (SETS). This data Includes PRP name and
address, a company contact person, the date the notice was
re'ate
NPI ™ rn t0 track PRP identification at
both NPL (National Priority List) and non-NPL sites SETS
: Also available in set of 5 reports PC
S^M- "•"— **".
°6|7\-Sit! Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
Listing by Site for Louisiana
Order Number PB91-170787CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Ste^nnr31 Pr°tefction ^enc^' Washington, DC. Office of
waste Programs Enforcement; 5 Apr 91
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
'ppTental ReSP°nSe' ComPensation and Lia'bl
PA mUSt C0nduct a search to identify parties
™ntr, n flt!fncial resPonsibi'ity for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issued a notice letter to the poten
tally responsible party (PRP). Data from this notice letter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS?
This data ,nc udes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person the date the notice was issued, and the related
rf R£h t f 6 ," ™e and 'deification number. SETS was
created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri
ority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS does not address the
r administrative duties related to tracking the
reporVs deigned to provide PRP information
Specifications: Also available in set of 5 reports PC E99/
PB9fl7n7?o1"1H°o7D61- ^^des PB91-130P914 See also
PB91 -1 70779 and PB91 -1 70795. 26p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste dis-
ana SitUFeiJUnd> Notifl^ation Procedures, Directories, Louisl
bTe p r? Enforcement Trackl'ng System, Potentially responsi-
0672 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)- PRP
Listing by Site for Maine
Order Number PB90-242892CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 2 Aug 90
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP). Data from this notice letter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)
The data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
!?.£* Person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
UERCLA site name and identification number. SETS was
created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
ority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS does not address the
range of other administrative duties related to tracking the
PRP. These lists (updated quarterly) represent EPA's prelimi-
nary findings on the identities of potentially responsible par-
ties. Inclusion on these lists does not constitute a final deter-
mination concerning the liability of any party for the hazard or
contamination at any CERCLA site. The site report is de-
signed to provide PRP information linked by the associated
site which appears according to Maine where the site is lo-
C3TGC1.
Specifications: Also available in set of 6 reports PC E99/
^oon"' PB9°-242876- See also PB90-242884 and PB90-
^.4&yOO. o9p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Maine
Waste disposal, Coordinated procurement, Directories Site
Enforcement Tracking System, Superfund, Remedial action.
0673 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
Listing by Site for Maine
Order Number PB91-130542CDH, price: PC A05/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 19 Dec 90
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP) for the state of Maine. Data
from this notice letter is used to form the Site Enforcement
Tracking System (SETS). This data includes PRP name and
address, a company contact person, the date the notice was
issued, and the related CERCLA site name and identification
h^ MO, IIs Was created to track PRP identification at
both NPL (National Priority List) and non-NPL sites SETS
does not address the range of other administrative duties re-
lated to tracking the PRP.
Specifications: Also available in set of 6 reports PC E99/
MF E99, PB91-130526. Supersedes PB90-242892 See also
PB91-130534 and PB91-130559. 79p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Maine,
Waste disposal, Coordinated procurement, Directories Site
Enforcement Tracking System, Superfund, Remedial action
Potentially responsible parties.
117
-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Enforcement
0674 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
Listing by Site for Maine
Order Number PB91-170456CDH, price: PC A05/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 5 Apr 91
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issued a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP). Data from this notice letter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETb).
This data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number. SETS was
created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pn-
ority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS does not address the
range of other administrative duties related to tracking the
PRP. The site report is designed to provide PRP information
linked by the associated site, which appears according to the
state where the site is located.
Specifications: Also available in set of 6 reports PC E99/
MF E99i PB91-170431. Supersedes PB91-130542. See also
PB91-170449 and PB91-170464. 81p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste dis-
posal, Superfund, Notification procedures, Directories, Maine,
Site Enforcement Tracking System, Potentially responsible
parties.
0675 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
Listing by Site for Maryland
Order Number PB90-243007CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 2 Aug 90
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP). Data from this notice letter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
The data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number. SETS was
created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
ority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS does not address the
range of other administrative duties related to tracking the
pRPi These lists (updated quarterly) represent EPA's prelimi-
nary findings on the identities of potentially responsible par-
ties Inclusion on these lists does not constitute a final deter-
mination concerning the liability of any party for the hazard or
contamination at any CERCLA site. The site report is de-
signed to provide PRP information linked by the associated
site, which appears according to Maryland where the site is
located.
Specifications: Also available in set of 5 reports PC E99/
MF E99, PB90-242983. See also PB90-242991 and PB90-
243015. 22p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Maryland,
Waste disposal, Coordinated procurement, Directories, Site
Enforcement Tracking System, Superfund, Remedial action.
0676 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
Listing by Site for Maryland
Order Number PB91 -130658CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 19 Dec 90
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
contrSed hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to he poten-
tially responsible party (PRP) for the state °j. M^f"^*3.
from this notice letter is used to form the Site Enforcement
Tracking System (SETS). This data includes PRP name and
address a company contact person, the date the notice was
issued, and the related CERCLA site name and ident.f.cat.on
number. SETS was created to track W *****»"*
both NPL (National Priority List) and non-NPL sites SETS
does not address the range of other administrative duties re-
lated to tracking the PRP.
Specifications: Also available in set of 5 reports PC E99/
MFE99 PB91-130633. Supersedes PB90-243007. See also
PB91-130641 and PB91-130666. 20p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Maryland,
Waste disposal, Coordinated procurement, Directories, Site
Enforcement Tracking System, Superfund, Remed.al action,
Potentially responsible parties.
0677 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
Listing by Site for Maryland
Order Number PB91 -170563CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 5 Apr 91
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issued a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP). Data from th.s notice letter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETb).
This data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number SETS was
created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pn-
ority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS does not address he
range of other administrative duties related to tracking the
PRP The site report is designed to provide PRP information
linked by the associated site, which appears according to the
state where the site is located.
Specifications: Also available in set of 5 reports PC E99/
MFE99PB91-170548. Supersedes PB91-130658. See also
PB91-170555 and PB91-170571. 27p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste dis-
posal, Superfund, Notification procedures, Directories, Mary-
land, Site Enforcement Tracking System, Potentially respon-
sible parties.
118
-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTAT70N: Enforcement
°6,7* Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)- PRP
Listing by Site for Massachusetts
Order Number PB90-242900CDH, price: PC
wrth r r , , a searc to identify parties
control HanC'al resP°nsibility for remediation of un
w»S f? nazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the Sen
used oTorthe sT/V^' ^ fr°m this "oBoe «£?!
PRP TheS .ertadmHiStrfiVe duties related to trackiS he
HHP These lists (updated quarterly) represent EPA's orelimi
set of 6 reports PC E99/
242918 219p" "" "' "^ a'BU PB9°-242892 and PB90-
06,7.9i.Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)- PRP
L.stmg by Site for Massachusetts '"
Order Number PB91-130559CDH, price: PC A10/MF A02
WasteTroa!»™T?™ A"ncy' Washin9ton, DC. Office of
waste Programs Enforcement; 20 Dec 90
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Comore-
S A*f ItT'S mualtReSPH0nSe' ComPensation and'SbH-
' ust cnduct a search to identify parties
sP°ns»y for remediation of un
waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Staff issue a notice 'etter to the poten
P) f°r the State of MassachES.
^^^
°f
Also
in set of 6 reports PC E99/
Sffw intd^- keywords: Hazardous materials, Massachu-
0680 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
Listing by Site for Massachusetts
Order Number PB91-170464CDH, price: PC A10/MF A02
tnvironmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 5 Apr 91
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ty Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
SI P,? !T,lal '"f ncial resP°nsibility for remediation of un-
waot I8/, hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issued a notice letter to the poten-
tially responable party (PRP). Data from this notice letter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)
This data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
r°Vhe date the notice was issued- ar>d the related
> Sl ,n!S£ and ider|tif'cation number. SETS was
n H R^ ldentification at both NPL (National Pri-
? 3hnd "°?~NPL Sites' SETS does not address the
T? 6r adm|mstrative duties related to tracking the
TJ9* reP°rt is desi9ned to provide PRP information
»* the associated site, which appears according to the
state where the site is located.
f£e^''Cations: Also availab|e in set of 6 reports PC E99/
PBQ1 9i97n^«91-1J°o4o31- SuPersedes PB91-130559. See alo
PB91 -170456 and PB91 -170472. 220p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste dis-
posal, Superfund, Notification procedures, Directories, Mas-
' P°tentially
Order Number PB90-243163CDH, price: PC A08/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 2 Aug 90
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
SvTtf the date the notice was issued. and the related
OhRCLA site name and identification number. SETS was
3 ° tra°k PRN ,identification at both NPL (National Pri-
K nTNPL Sites- SETS does not address the
Oth1er: administrative duties related to tracking the
nf36 llsts ("Pdated quarterly) represent EPA's prelimi-
nary findings on the identities of potentially responsible par-
ties. Inclusion on these lists does not constitute a final deter-
mination concerning the liability of any party for the hazard or
cpntarmnat,on at any CERCLA site. The site report is de-
signed to prov.de PRP information linked by the associated
Seated appears according to Michigan where the site is
n: AIS° available in set of 6 reports PC E99/
43130> See a'S° PB9°-243155 and PB90-
wt, keywords: Hazardous materials, Michigan
Waste disposal, Coordinated procurement, Directories Site
Enforcement Tracking System, Superfund, Remedial action
119
-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Enforcement
0682 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
Listing by Site for Michigan
Order Number PB91-130807CDH, price: PC A08/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 19 Dec 90
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP) for the state of Michigan. Data
from this notice letter is used to form the Site Enforcement
Tracking System (SETS). This data includes PRP name and
address, a company contact person, the date the notice was
issued, and the related CERCLA site name and identification
number. SETS was created to track PRP identification at
both NPL (National Priority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS
does not address the range of other administrative duties re-
lated to tracking the PRP.
Specifications: Also available in set of 6 reports PC E99/
MF E99, PB91-130773. Supersedes PB90-243163. See also
PB91-130799 and PB91-130815. 158p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Michigan,
Waste disposal, Coordinated procurement, Directories, Site
Enforcement Tracking System, Superfund, Remedial action,
Potentially responsible parties.
0683 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
Listing by Site for Michigan
Order Number PB91-170720CDH, price: PC A08/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 5 Apr 91
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issued a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP). Data from this notice letter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
This data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number. SETS was
created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
ority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS does not address the
range of other administrative duties related to tracking the
PRP. The site report is designed to provide PRP information
linked by the associated site, which appears according to the
state where the site is located.
Specifications: Also available in set of 6 reports PC E99/
MF E99, PB91-170696. Supersedes PB91-130807. See also
PB91-170712 and PB91-170738. 167p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste dis-
posal Superfund, Notification procedures, Directories, Michi-
gan, Site Enforcement Tracking System, Potentially responsi-
ble parties.
0684 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
Listing by Site for Minnesota
Order Number PB90-243171CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 2 Aug 90
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to thepoten-
tially responsible party (PRP). Data from this notice letter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETb).
The data includes PRP name and address a ^pany con-
tact person, the date the notice was issued and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number SETSi was
created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pn-
oW List) and non-NPL sites. SETS does not address he
range of other administrative duties related to tracking the
PRP These lists (updated quarterly) represent EPAs prelimi-
nary'findings on the identities of Potentially responsible par-
ties Inclusion on these lists does not constitute a f.nalI deter-
mination concerning the liability of any party for the hazard or
contamination at any CERCLA site The site.report is^de-
signed to provide PRP information linked by the associated
site, which appears according to Minnesota where the site is
located.
Specifications: Also available in set of 6 reports PC E99/
MF E99, PB90-243130. See also PB90-243163 and PB90-
243189. 56p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Minnesota
Waste disposal, Coordinated procurement, Directories^Site
Enforcement Tracking System, Superfund, Remedial action.
0685 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
Listing by Site for Minnesota
Order Number PB91 -130815CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 19 Dec 90
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA^Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the: poten-
tially responsible party (PRP) for the state of M.nnesota. Data
from this notice letter is used to form the Site Enfoi^rnent
Tracking System (SETS). This data includes PRP name and
address a company contact person, the date the no ice was
fssued, knd the related CERCLA site name and 'dentification
number. SETS was created to track PRP 'dent, icatior, at
both NPL (National Priority List) and non-NPL sites SETS
does not address the range of other administrative duties re-
lated to tracking the PRP.
Specifications: Also available in set of 6 reports PC E99/
MFE99PB91-130773. Supersedes PB90-243171. See also
PB91-130807 and PB91-130823. 55p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Minnesota,
Waste disposal, Coordinated procurement Directories Site
Enforcement Tracking System, Superfund, Remedial action,
Potentially responsible parties.
120
-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Enforcement
0686 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)- PRP
Listing by Site for Minnesota
Order Number PB91-170738CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 5 Apr 91
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issued a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP)., Data from this notice letter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)
This data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number. SETS was
created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
ority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS does not address the
range of other administrative duties related to tracking the
PRP. The site report is designed to provide PRP information
linked by the associated site, which appears according to the
state where the site is located.
Specifications: Also available in set of 6 reports PC E99/
MF E99, PB91-170696. Supersedes PB91-130815 See also
PB91-170720 and PB91-170746. 57p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste dis-
posal, Superfund, Notification procedures, Directories, Minne-
sota, Site Enforcement Tracking System, Potentially respon-
sible parties.
0687 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
Listing by Site for Mississippi
Order Number PB90-243098CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 2 Aug 90
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP). Data from this notice letter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
The data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number. SETS was
created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
ority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS does not address the
range of other administrative duties related to tracking the
PRP. These lists (updated quarterly) represent EPA's prelimi-
nary findings on the identities of potentially responsible par-
ties. Inclusion on these lists does not constitute a final deter-
mination concerning the liability of any party for the hazard or
contamination at any CERCLA site. The site report is de-
signed to provide PRP information linked by the associated
site, which appears according to Mississippi where the site is
located.
Specifications: Also available in set of 8 reports PC E99/
MF E99, PB90-243049. See also PB90-243080 and PB90-
243106. 16p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Mississippi,
Waste disposal, Coordinated procurement, Directories, Site
Enforcement Tracking System, Superfund, Remedial action.
0688 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
Listing by Site for Mississippi
Order Number PB91-130732CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 19 Dec 90
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP) for the state of Mississippi.
Data from this notice letter is used to form the Site Enforce-
ment Tracking System (SETS). This data includes PRP name
and address, a company contact person, the date the notice
was issued, and the related CERCLA site name and identifi-
cation number. SETS was created to track PRP identification
at both NPL (National Priority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS
does not address the range of other administrative duties re-
lated to tracking the PRP.
Specifications: Also available in set of 8 reports PC E99/
MF E99, PB91-130690. Supersedes PB90-243098. See'also
PB91-130724 and PB91-130740. 8p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Mississippi,
Waste disposal, Coordinated procurement, Directories, Site
Enforcement Tracking System, Superfund, Remedial action,
Potentially responsible parties.
0689 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
Listing by Site for Mississippi
Order Number PB91-170654CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 5 Apr 91
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issued a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP). Data from this notice letter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
This data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number. SETS was
created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
ority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS does not address the
range of other administrative duties related to tracking the
PRP. The site report is designed to provide PRP information
linked by the associated site, which appears according to the
state where the site is located.
Specifications: Also available in set of 8 reports PC E99/
MF E99, PB91-170605. Supersedes PB91-130732. See also
PB91-170647 and PB91-170662. 10p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste dis-
posal, Superfund, Notification procedures, Directories, Missis-
sippi, Site Enforcement Tracking System, Potentially respon-
sible parties.
121
-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Enforcement
0690 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
Listing by Site for Missouri
Order Number PB90-243296CDH, price: PC A07/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 2 Aug 90
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP). Data from this notice letter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
The data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number. SETS was
created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
ority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS does not address the
range of other administrative duties related to tracking the
PRP. These lists (updated quarterly) represent EPA's prelimi-
nary findings on the identities of potentially responsible par-
ties. Inclusion on these lists does not constitute a final deter-
mination concerning the liability of any party for the hazard or
contamination at any CERCLA site. The site report is de-
signed to provide PRP information linked by the associated
site, which appears according to Missouri where the site is
located.
Specifications: Also available in set of 4 reports PC E99/
MF E99, PB90-243262. See also PB90-243288 and PB90-
243304. 141 p.
Subject Index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste dis-
posal, Missouri, Coordinated procurement, Directories, Site
Enforcement Tracking System, Superfund, Remedial action.
0691 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
Listing by Site for Missouri
Order Number PB91-130989CDH, price: PC A07/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 19 Dec 90
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP) for the state of Missouri. Data
from this notice letter is used to form the Site Enforcement
Tracking System (SETS). This data includes PRP name and
address, a company contact person, the date the notice was
issued, and the related CERCLA site name and identification
number. SETS was created to track PRP identification at
both NPL (National Priority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS
does not address the range of other administrative duties re-
lated to tracking the PRP.
Specifications: Also available in set of 4 reports PC E99/
MF E99, PB91-130955. Supersedes PB90-243296. See also
PB91-130971 and PB91-130997. 139p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Missouri,
Waste disposal, Coordinated procurement, Directories, Site
Enforcement Tracking System, Superfund, Remedial action,
Potentially responsible parties.
0692 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
Listing by Site for Missouri
Order Number PB91-170852CDH, price: PC A08/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 5 Apr 91
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issued a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP). Data from this notice letter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
This data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number. SETS was
created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
ority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS does not address the
range of other administrative duties related to tracking the
PRP. The site report is designed to provide PRP information
linked by the associated site, which appears according to the
state where the site is located.
Specifications: Also available in set of 4 reports PC E99/
MF E99, PB91-170829. Supersedes PB91-130989. See also
PB91-170845 and PB91-170860. 165p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste dis-
posal, Superfund, Notification procedures, Directories, Mis-
souri, Site Enforcement Tracking System, Potentially respon-
sible parties.
0693 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
Listing by Site for Montana
Order Number PB90-243338CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 2 Aug 90
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP). Data from this notice letter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
The data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number. SETS was
created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
ority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS does not address the
range of other administrative duties related to tracking the
PRP. These lists (updated quarterly) represent EPA's prelimi-
nary findings on the identities of potentially responsible par-
ties. Inclusion on these lists does not constitute a final deter-
mination concerning the liability of any party for the hazard or
contamination at any CERCLA site. The site report is de-
signed to provide PRP information linked by the associated
site, which appears according to Montana where the site is
located.
Specifications: Also available in set of 6 reports PC E99/
MF E99] RB90-243312. See also PB90-243320 and PB90-
243346. 13p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste dis-
posal, Montana, Coordinated procurement, Directories, Site
Enforcement Tracking System, Superfund, Remedial action.
122
-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Enforcement
0694 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
Listing by Site for Montana
Order Number PB91-131029CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 19 Dec 90
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP) for the state of Montana. Data
from this notice letter is used to form the Site Enforcement
Tracking System (SETS). This data includes PRP name and
address, a company contact person, the date the notice was
issued, and the related CERCLA site name and identification
number. SETS was created to track PRP identification at
both NPL (National Priority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS
does not address the range of other administrative duties re-
lated to tracking the PRP.
Specifications: Also available in set of 6 reports PC E99/
MF E99, PB91-131003. Supersedes PB90-243338. See also
PB91-131011 andPB91-131037. 13p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Montana,
Waste disposal, Coordinated procurement, Directories, Site
Enforcement Tracking System, Superfund, Remedial action,
Potentially responsible parties.
0695 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
Listing by Site for Montana
Order Number PB91-170894CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 5 Apr 91
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issued a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP). Data from this notice letter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
This data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number. SETS was
created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
ority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS does not address the
range of other administrative duties related to tracking the
PRP. The site report is designed to provide PRP information
linked by the associated site, which appears according to the
state where the site is located.
Specifications: Also available in set of 6 reports PC E99/
MF E99, PB91-170878. Supersedes PB91-131029. See also
PB91 -170886 and PB91 -170902. 15p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste dis-
posal, Superfund, Notification procedures, Directories, Mon-
tana, Site Enforcement Tracking System, Potentially respon-
sible parties.
0696 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
Listing by Site for Nebraska
Order Number PB90-243304CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 2 Aug 90
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP). Data from this notice letter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
The data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number. SETS was
created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
ority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS does not address the
range of other administrative duties related to tracking the
PRP. These lists (updated quarterly) represent EPA's prelimi-
nary findings on the identities of potentially responsible par-
ties. Inclusion on these lists does not constitute a final deter-
mination concerning the liability of any party for the hazard or
contamination at any CERCLA site. The site report is de-
signed to provide PRP information linked by the associated
site, which appears according to Nebraska where the site is
located.
Specifications: Also available in set of 4 reports PC E99/
MF E99, PB90-243262. See also PB90-243296. 10p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste dis-
posal, Nebraska, Coordinated procurement, Directories, Site
Enforcement Tracking System, Superfund, Remedial action.
0697 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
Listing by Site for Nebraska
Order Number PB91-130997CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 19 Dec 90
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP) for the state of Nebraska. Data
from this notice letter is used to form the Site Enforcement
Tracking System (SETS). This data includes PRP name and
address, a company contact person, the date the notice was
issued, and the related CERCLA site name and identification
number. SETS was created to track PRP identification at
both NPL (National Priority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS
does not address the range of other administrative duties re-
lated to tracking the PRP.
Specifications: Also available in set of 4 reports PC E99/
MF E99, PB91-130955. Supersedes PB90-243304, See also
PB91-130989. 8p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Nebraska,
Waste disposal, Coordinated procurement, Directories, Site
Enforcement Tracking System, Superfund, Remedial action,
Potentially responsible parties.
123
-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Enforcement
0698 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
Listing by Site for Nebraska
Order Number PB91-170860CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 5 Apr 91
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issued a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP). Data from this notice letter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
This data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number. SETS was
created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
ority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS does not address the
range of other administrative duties related to tracking the
PRP, The site report is designed to provide PRP information
linked by the associated site, which appears according to the
state where the site is located.
Specifications: Also available in set of 4 reports PC E99/
MF E99, PB91-170829. Supersedes PB91-130997. See also
PB91-170852. 10p.
Subject Index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste dis-
posal, Superfund, Notification procedures, Directories, Ne-
braska, Site Enforcement Tracking System, Potentially re-
sponsible parties.
0699 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
Listing by Site for Nevada
Order Number PB90-243429CDH, price: PC A01/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 2 Aug 90
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP). Data from this notice letter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
The data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number. SETS was
created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
ority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS does not address the
range of other administrative duties related to tracking the
PRP. These lists (updated quarterly) represent EPA's prelimi-
nary findings on the identities of potentially responsible par-
ties. Inclusion on these lists does not constitute a final deter-
mination concerning the liability of any party for the hazard or
contamination at any CERCLA site. The site report is de-
signed to provide PRP information linked by the associated
site, which appears according to Nevada where the site is lo-
cated.
Specifications: Also available in set of 6 reports PC E99/
MF E99, PB90-243387. See also PB90-243411 and PB90-
243437. 5p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Nevada,
Waste disposal, Coordinated procurement, Directories, Site
Enforcement Tracking System, Superfund, Remedial action.
0700 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
Listing by Site for Nevada
Order Number PB91-131110CDH, price: PC A01/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 19 Dec 90
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP) for the state of Nevada. Data
from this notice letter is used to form the Site Enforcement
Tracking System (SETS). This data includes PRP name and
address, a company contact person, the date the notice was
issued, and the related CERCLA site name and identification
number. SETS was created to track PRP identification at
both NPL (National Priority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS
does not address the range of other administrative duties re-
lated to tracking the PRP.
Specifications: Also available in set of 6 reports PC E99/
MF E99, PB91-131078. Supersedes PB90-243429. See also
PB91-131102 and PB91-131128. 4p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Nevada,
Waste disposal, Coordinated procurement, Directories, Site
Enforcement Tracking System, Superfund, Remedial action,
Potentially responsible parties.
0701 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
Listing by Site for Nevada
Order Number PB91-170985CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 5 Apr 91
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issued a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP). Data from this notice letter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
This data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number. SETS was
created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
ority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS does not address the
range of other administrative duties related to tracking the
PRP. The site report is designed to provide PRP information
linked by the associated site, which appears according to the
state where the site is located.
Specifications: Also available in set of 6 reports PC E99/
MF E99, PB91-170944. Supersedes PB91-131110. See also
PB91-170977 and PB91-170993. 7p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste dis-
posal, Superfund, Notification procedures, Directories,
Nevada, Site Enforcement Tracking System, Potentially re-
sponsible parties.
124
-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Enforcement
0702 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
Listing by Site for New Hampshire
Order Number PB90-242918CDH, price: PC A06/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 2 Aug 90
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP). Data from this notice letter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
The data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number. SETS was
created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
ority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS does not address the
range of other administrative duties related to tracking the
PRP. These lists (updated quarterly) represent EPA's prelimi-
nary findings on the identities of potentially responsible par-
ties. Inclusion on these lists does not constitute a final deter-
mination concerning the liability of any party for the hazard or
contamination at any CERCLA site. The site report is de-
signed to provide PRP information linked by the associated
site, which appears according to New Hampshire where the
site is located.
Specifications: Also available in set of 6 reports PC E99/
MF E99, PB90-242876. See also PB90-242900 and PB90-
242926. 109p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, New Hamp-
shire, Waste disposal, Coordinated procurement, Directories,
Site Enforcement Tracking System, Superfund, Remedial
action.
0703 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
Listing by Site for New Hampshire
Order Number PB91-130567CDH, price: PC A06/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 19 Dec 90
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP) for the state of New Hamp-
shire. Data from this notice letter is used to form the Site En-
forcement Tracking System (SETS). This data includes PRP
name and address, a company contact person, the date the
notice was issued, and the related CERCLA site name and
identification number. SETS was created to track PRP identi-
fication at both NPL (National Priority List) and non-NPL
sites. SETS does not address the range of other administra-
tive duties related to tracking the PRP.
Specifications: Also available in set of 6 reports PC E99/
MF E99, PB91-130526. Supersedes PB90-242918. See also
PB91-130559 and PB91-130575. 109p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, New Hamp-
shire, Waste disposal, Coordinated procurement, Directories,
Site Enforcement Tracking System, Superfund, Remedial
action, Potentially responsible parties.
0704 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
Listing by Site for New Hampshire
Order Number PB91-170472CDH, price: PC A06/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 5 Apr 91
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issued a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP). Data from this notice letter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
This data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number. SETS was
created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
ority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS does not address the
range of other administrative duties related to tracking the
PRP. The site report is designed to provide PRP information
linked by the associated site, which appears according to the
state where the site is located.
Specifications: Also available in set of 6 reports PC E99/
MF E99, PB91-170431. Supersedes PB91-130567. See also
PB91-130559 and PB91-170480. 109p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste dis-
posal, Superfund, Notification procedures, Directories, New
Hampshire, Site Enforcement Tracking System, Potentially
responsible parties.
0705 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
Listing by Site for New Jersey
Order Number PB90-242959CDH, price: PC A07/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 2 Aug 90
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP). Data from this notice letter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
The data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number. SETS was
created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
ority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS does not address the
range of other administrative duties related to tracking the
PRP. These lists (updated quarterly) represent EPA's prelimi-
nary findings on the identities of potentially responsible par-
ties. Inclusion on these lists does not constitute a final deter-
mination concerning the liability of any party for the hazard or
contamination at any CERCLA site. The site report is de-
signed to provide PRP information linked by the associated
site, which appears according to New Jersey where the site
is located.
Specifications: Also available in set of 3 reports PC E99/
MF E99, PB90-242942. See also PB90-242942 and PB90-
242967. 128p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, New Jersey,
Coordinated procurement, Directories, Waste disposal, Site
Enforcement Tracking System, Remedial action, Superfund.
125
-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Enforcement
0706 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
Listing by Site for New Jersey
Order Number PB91-130609CDH, price: PC A07/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 19 Dec 90
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP) for the state of New Jersey.
Data from this notice letter is used to form the Site Enforce-
ment Tracking System (SETS). This data includes PRP name
and address, a company contact person, the date the 'notice
was issued, and the related CERCLA site name and identifi-
cation number. SETS was created to track PRP identification
at both NPL (National Priority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS
does not address the range of other administrative duties re-
lated to tracking the PRP.
Specifications: Also available in set of 3 reports PC E99/
MF E99, PB91-130591. Supersedes PB90-242959. See also
PB91-130617. 126p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, New Jersey,
Waste disposal, Coordinated procurement, Directories, Site
Enforcement Tracking System, Superfund, Remedial action,
Potentially responsible parties.
0707 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
Listing by Site for New Jersey
Order Number PB91-170514CDH, price: PC A07/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 5 Apr 91
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issued a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP). Data from this notice letter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
This data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number. SETS was
created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
ority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS does not address the
range of other administrative duties related to tracking the
PRP. The site report is designed to provide PRP information
linked by the associated site, which appears according to the
state where the site is located.
Specifications: Also available in set of 3 reports PC E99/
MF E99, PB91-170506. Supersedes PB91-130609. See also
PB91-170522. 128p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste dis-
posal, Superfund, Notification procedures, Directories, New
Jersey, Site Enforcement Tracking System, Potentially re-
sponsible parties.
0708 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
Listing by Site for New Mexico
Order Number PB90-243239CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 2 Aug 90
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP). Data from this notice letter is
used ,to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
The data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number. SETS was
created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
ority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS does not address the
range of other administrative duties related to tracking the
PRP. These lists (updated quarterly) represent EPA's prelimi-
nary findings on the identities of potentially responsible par-
ties. Inclusion on these lists does not constitute a final deter-
mination concerning the liability of any party for the hazard or
contamination at any CERCLA site. The site report is de-
signed to provide PRP information linked by the associated
site, which appears according to New Mexico where the site
is located.
Specifications: Also available in set of 5 reports PC E99/
MF E99, PB90-243205. See also PB90-243221 and PB90-
243247. 9p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, New
Mexico, Waste disposal, Coordinated procurement, Directo-
ries, Site Enforcement Tracking System, Superfund, Remedi-
al action.
0709 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
Listing by Site for New Mexico
Order Number PB91-130922CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 19 Dec 90
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP) for the state of New Mexico.
Data from this notice letter is used to form the Site Enforce-
ment Tracking System (SETS). This data includes PRP name
and address, a company contact person, the date the notice
was issued, and the related CERCLA site name and identifi-
cation number. SETS was created to track PRP identification
at both NPL (National Priority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS
does not address the range of other administrative duties re-
lated to tracking the PRP.
Specifications: Also available in set of 5 reports PC E99/
MF E99, PB91-130898. Supersedes PB90-243239. See also
PB91-130914 and PB91-130930. 8p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, New
Mexico, Waste disposal, Coordinated procurement, Directo-
ries, Site Enforcement Tracking System, Superfund, Remedi-
al action, Potentially responsible parties.
126
-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Enforcement
0710 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
Listing by Site for New Mexico
Order Number PB91-170795CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 5 Apr 91
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issued a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP). Data from this notice letter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
This data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number. SETS was
created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
ority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS does not address the
range of other administrative duties related to tracking the
PRP. The site report is designed to provide PRP information
linked by the associated site, which appears according to the
state where the site is located.
Specifications: Also available in set of 5 reports PC E99/
MF E99, PB91-170761. Supersedes PB91-130922. See also
PB91-170787 and PB91-170803. 9p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste dis-
posal, Superfund, Notification procedures, Directories, New
Mexico, Site Enforcement Tracking System, Potentially re-
sponsible parties.
0711 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
Listing by Site for New York
Order Number PB90-242967CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 2 Aug 90
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP). Data from this notice letter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
The data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number. SETS was
created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
ority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS does not address the
range of other administrative duties related to tracking the
PRP. These lists (updated quarterly) represent EPA's prelimi-
nary findings on the identities of potentially responsible par-
ties. Inclusion on these lists does not constitute a final deter-
mination concerning the liability of any party for the hazard or
contamination at any CERCLA site. The site report is de-
signed to provide PRP information linked by the associated
site, which appears according to New York where the site is
located.
Specifications: Also available in set of 3 reports PC E99/
MF E99, PB90-242942. See also PB90-242959 and PB90-
242975. 33p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, New York,
Coordinated procurement, Directories, Waste disposal, Site
Enforcement Tracking System, Remedial action, Superfund.
0712 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
Listing by Site for New York
Order Number PB91-130617CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 19 Dec 90
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP) for the state of New York. Data
from this notice letter is used to form the Site Enforcement
Tracking System (SETS). This data includes PRP name and
address, a company contact person, the date the notice was
issued, and the related CERCLA site name and identification
number. SETS was created to track PRP identification at
both NPL (National Priority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS
does not address the range of other administrative duties re-
lated to tracking the PRP.
Specifications: Also available in set of 3 reports PC E99/
MF E99, PB91-130591. Supersedes PB90-242967. See also
PB91-130609 and PB91-130625. 30p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, New York,
Waste disposal, Coordinated procurement, Directories, Site
Enforcement Tracking System, Superfund, Remedial action,
Potentially responsible parties.
0713 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
Listing by Site for New York
Order Number PB91-170522CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 5 Apr 91
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issued a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP). Data from this notice letter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
This data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number. SETS was
created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
ority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS does not address the
range, of other administrative duties related to tracking the
PRP. The site report is designed to provide PRP information
, linked by the associated site, which appears according to the
state where the site is located.
Specifications: Also available in set of 3 reports PC E99/
MF E99, PB91-170506. Supersedes PB91-130617. See also
PB91-170514 and PB91-170530. 32p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste dis-
posal, Superfund, Notification procedures, Directories, New
York, Site Enforcement Tracking System, Potentially respon-
sible parties.
127
-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Enforcement
0714 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
Listing by Site for North Carolina
Order Number PB90-243106CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 2 Aug 90
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP). Data from this notice letter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
The data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number. SETS was
created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
ority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS does not address the
range of other administrative duties related to tracking the
PRP. These lists (updated quarterly) represent EPA's prelimi-
nary findings on the identities of potentially responsible par-
ties. Inclusion on these lists does not constitute a final deter-
mination concerning the liability of any party for the hazard or
contamination at any CERCLA site. The site report is de-
signed to provide PRP information linked by the associated
site, which appears according to North Carolina where the
site is located.
Specifications: Also available in set of 8 reports PC E99/
MF E99, PB90-243049. See also PB90-243098 and PB90-
243114. 31 p.
Subject Index keywords: Hazardous materials, North Caro-
lina, Waste disposal. Coordinated procurement, Directories,
Site Enforcement Tracking System, Superfund, Remedial
action.
0715 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
Listing by Site for North Carolina
Order Number PB91-130740CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 19 Dec 90
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP) for the state of North Carolina.
Data from this notice letter is used to form the Site Enforce-
ment Tracking System (SETS). This data includes PRP name
and address, a company contact person, the date the notice
was issued, and the related CERCLA site name and identifi-
cation number. SETS was created to track PRP identification
at both NPL (National Priority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS
does not address the range of other administrative duties re-
lated to tracking the PRP.
Specifications: Also available in set of 8 reports PC E99/
MF E99, PB91-130690. Supersedes PB90-243106. See also
PB91-130732 and PB91-130757. 29p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, North Caro-
lina, Waste disposal, Coordinated procurement, Directories,
Site Enforcement Tracking System, Superfund, Remedial
action, Potentially responsible parties.
0716 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
Listing by Site for North Carolina
Order Number PB91-170662CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 5 Apr 91
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issued a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP). Data from this notice letter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
This data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number. SETS was
created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
ority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS does not address the
range of other administrative duties related to tracking the
PRP. The site report is designed to provide PRP information
linked by the associated site, which appears according to the
state where the site is located.
Specifications: Also available in set of 8 reports PC E99/
MF E99, PB91-170605. Supersedes PB91-130740. See also
PB91 -170654 and PB91 -170670. 31 p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste dis-
posal, Superfund, Notification procedures, Directories, North
Carolina, Site Enforcement Tracking System, Potentially re-
sponsible parties.
0717 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
Listing by Site for North Dakota
Order Number PB90-243346CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 2 Aug 90
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP). Data from this notice letter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
The data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number. SETS was
created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
ority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS does not address the
range of other administrative duties related to tracking the
PRP. These lists (updated quarterly) represent EPA's prelimi-
nary findings on the identities of potentially responsible par-
ties. Inclusion on these lists does not constitute a final deter-
mination concerning the liability of any party for the hazard or
contamination at any CERCLA site. The site report is de-
signed to provide PRP information linked by the associated
site, which appears according to North Dakota where the site
is located.
Specifications: Also available in set of 6 reports PC E99/
MF E99, PB90-243312. See also PB90-243338 and PB90-
243353. 7p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste dis-
posal, North Dakota, Coordinated procurement, Directories,
128
-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Enforcement
Site Enforcement Tracking System, Superfund, Remedial
action.
0718 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
Listing by Site for North Dakota
Order Number PB91-131037CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 19 Dec 90
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP) for the state of North Dakota.
Data from this notice letter is used to form the Site Enforce-
ment Tracking System (SETS). This data includes PRP name
and address, a company contact person, the date the notice
was issued, and the related CERCLA site name and identifi-
cation number. SETS was created to track PRP identification
at both NPL (National Priority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS
does not address the range of other administrative duties re-
lated to tracking the PRP.
Specifications: Also available in set of 6 reports PC E99/
MF E99, PB91-131003. Supersedes PB90-243346. See also
PB91-131029 and PB91-131045. 7p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, North
Dakota, Waste disposal, Coordinated procurement, Directo-
ries, Site Enforcement Tracking System, Superfund, Remedi-
al action, Potentially responsible parties.
0719 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
Listing by Site for North Dakota
Order Number PB91-170902CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 5 Apr 91
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issued a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP). Data from this notice letter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
This data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number. SETS was
created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
ority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS does not address the
range of other administrative duties related to tracking the
PRP. The site report is designed to provide PRP information
linked by the associated site, which appears according to the
state where the site is located.
Specifications: Also available in set of 6 reports PC E99/
MF E99, PB91-170878. Supersedes PB91-131037. See also
PB91-170894 and PB91-170910. 8p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste dis-
posal, Superfund, Notification procedures, Directories, North
Dakota, Site Enforcement Tracking System, Potentially re-
sponsible parties.
0720 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
Listing by Site for Northern Marianas
Order Number PB90-243437CDH, price: PC A01/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 2 Aug 90
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP). Data from this notice letter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
The data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number. SETS was
created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
ority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS does not address the
range of other administrative duties related to tracking the
PRP. These lists (updated quarterly) represent EPA's prelimi-
nary findings on the identities of potentially responsible par-
ties. Inclusion on these lists does not constitute a final deter-
mination concerning the liability of any party for the hazard or
contamination at any CERCLA site. The site report is de-
signed to provide PRP information linked by the associated
site, which appears according to Northern Mariana Islands
where the site is located.
Specifications: Also available in set of 6 reports PC E99/
MF E99, PB90-243387. See also PB90-243429 and PB90-
243445. 5p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Mariana Is-
lands, Waste disposal, Coordinated procurement, Directories,
Site Enforcement Tracking System, Superfund, Remedial
action.
0721 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
Listing by Site for Northern Marianas
Order Number PB91-131128CDH, price: PC A01/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 19 Dec 90
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP) for the Northern Mariana Is-
lands. Data from this notice letter is used to form the Site
Enforcement Tracking System (SETS). This data includes
PRP name and address, a company contact person, the date
the notice was issued, and the related CERCLA site name
and identification number. SETS was created to track PRP
identification at both NPL (National Priority List) and non-NPL
sites. SETS does not address the range of other administra-
tive duties related to tracking the PRP.
Specifications: Also available in set of 6 reports PC E99/
MF E99, PB91-131078. Supersedes PB90-243437. See also
PB91-131110 and PB91-131136. 4p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Mariana Is-
lands, Waste disposal, Coordinated procurement, Directories,
Site Enforcement Tracking System, Superfund, Remedial
action, Potentially responsible parties.
129
-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Enforcement
0722 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
Listing by Site for Northern Marianas
Order Number PB91-170993CDH, price: PC A01/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 5 Apr 91
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issued a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP). Data from this notice letter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
This data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number. SETS was
created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
ority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS does not address the
range of other administrative duties related to tracking the
PRP. The site report is designed to provide PRP information
linked by the associated site, which appears according to the
state where the site is located.
Specifications: Also available in set of 6 reports PC E99/
MF E99, PB91-170944. Supersedes PB91-131128. See also
PB91-170985 and PB91-171009. 5p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste dis-
posal, Superfund, Notification procedures, Directories, Mari-
ana Islands, Site Enforcement Tracking System, Potentially
responsible parties.
0723 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
Listing by Site for Ohio
Order Number PB90-243189CDH, price: PC A06/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 2 Aug 90
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP). Data from this notice letter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
The data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number. SETS was
created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
ority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS does not address the
range of other administrative duties related to tracking the
PRP. These lists (updated quarterly) represent EPA's prelimi-
nary findings on the identities of potentially responsible par-
ties. Inclusion on these lists does not constitute a final deter-
mination concerning the liability of any party for the hazard or
contamination at any CERCLA site. The site report is de-
signed to provide PRP information linked by the associated
site, which appears according to Ohio where the site is locat-
ed.
Specifications: Also available in set of 6 reports PC E99/
MF E99, PB90-243130. See also PB90-243171 and PB90-
243197. 105p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Ohio, Waste
disposal, Coordinated procurement, Directories, Site Enforce-
ment Tracking System, Superfund, Remedial action.
0724 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
Listing by Site for Ohio
Order Number PB91-130823CDH, price: PC A06/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 19 Dec 90
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP) for the state of Ohio. Data from
this notice letter is used to form the Site Enforcement Track-
ing System (SETS). This data includes PRP name and ad-
dress, a company contact person, the date the notice was
issued, and the related CERCLA site name and identification
number. SETS was created to track PRP identification at
both NPL (National Priority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS
does not address the range of other administrative duties re-
lated to tracking the PRP.
Specifications: Also available in set of 6 reports PC E99/
MF E99, PB91-130773. Supersedes PB90-243189. See also
PB91-130815 and PB91-130831. 104p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Ohio, Waste
disposal, Coordinated procurement, Directories, Site Enforce-
ment Tracking System, Superfund, Remedial action, Poten-
tially responsible parties.
0725 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
Listing by Site for Ohio
Order Number PB91-170746CDH, price: PC A06/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 5 Apr 91
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issued a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP). Data from this notice letter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
This data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number. SETS was
created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
ority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS does not address the
range of other administrative duties related to tracking the
PRP. The site report is designed to provide PRP information
linked by the associated site, which appears according to the
state where the site is located.
Specifications: Also available in set of 6 reports PC E99/
MF E99, PB91-170696. Supersedes PB91-130823. See also
PB91-170738 and PB91-170753. 115p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste dis-
posal, Superfund, Notification procedures, Directories, Ohio,
Site Enforcement Tracking System, Potentially responsible
parties.
130
-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Enforcement
0726 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
Listing by Site for Oklahoma
Order Number PB90-243247CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 2 Aug 90
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP). Data from this notice letter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
The data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number. SETS was
created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
ority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS does not address the
range of other administrative duties related to tracking the
PRP. These lists (updated quarterly) represent EPA's prelimi-
nary findings on the identities of potentially responsible par-
ties. Inclusion on these lists does not constitute a final deter-
mination concerning the liability of any party for the hazard or
contamination at any CERCLA site. The site report is de-
signed to provide PRP information linked by the associated
site, which appears according to Oklahoma where the site is
located.
Specifications: Also available in set of 5 reports PC E99/
MF E99, PB90-243205. See also PB90-243239 and PB90-
243254. 69p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Oklahoma,
Waste disposal, Coordinated procurement, Directories, Site
Enforcement Tracking System, Superfund, Remedial action.
0727 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
Listing by Site for Oklahoma
Order Number PB91-130930CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 19 Dec 90
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP) for the state of Oklahoma. Data
from this notice letter is used to form the Site Enforcement
Tracking System (SETS). This data includes PRP name and
address, a company contact person, the date the notice was
issued, and the related CERCLA site name and identification
number. SETS was created to track PRP identification at
both NPL (National Priority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS
does not address the range of other administrative duties re-
lated to tracking the PRP.
Specifications: Also available in set of 5 reports PC E99/
MF E99, PB91-130898. Supersedes PB90-243247. See also
PB91-130922 and PB91-130948. 68p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Oklahoma,
Waste disposal, Coordinated procurement, Directories, Site
Enforcement Tracking System, Superfund, Remedial action,
Potentially responsible parties.
0728 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
Listing by Site for Oklahoma
Order Number PB91-170803CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 5 Apr 91
.When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issued a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP). Data from this notice letter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
This data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number. SETS was
created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
ority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS does not address the
range of other administrative duties related to tracking the
PRP. The site report is designed to provide PRP information
linked by the associated, site, which appears according to the
state where the site is located.
Specifications: Also available in set of 5 reports PC E99/
MF E99.PB91-170761. Supersedes PB91-130930. See also
PB91-170795 and PB91-170811. 69p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste dis-
posal, Superfund, Notification procedures, Directories, Okla-
homa, Site Enforcement Tracking System, Potentially respon-
sible parties.
0729 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
Listing by Site for Oregon
Order Number PB90-243478CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
.Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 2 Aug 90
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP). Data from this notice letter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
The data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number. SETS was
created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
ority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS does not address the
range of other administrative duties related to tracking the
PRP. These lists (updated quarterly) represent EPA's prelimi-
nary findings on the identities of potentially responsible par-
ties. Inclusion on these lists does not constitute a final deter-
mination concerning the liability of any party for the hazard or
contamination at any CERCLA site. The site report is de-
signed to provide PRP information linked by the associated
site, which appears according to Oregon where the site is lo-
cated.
Specifications: Also available in set of 3 reports PC E99/
MF E99, PB90-243452. See also PB90-243460 and PB90-
243486. 6p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Oregon,
Waste disposal, Coordinated procurement, Directories, Site
Enforcement Tracking System, Superfund, Remedial action.
131
-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Enforcement
0730 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
Listing by Site for Oregon
Order Number PB91-131169CDH, price: PC A01/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 19 Dec 90
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Actf site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP) for the state of Oregon. Data
from this notice letter is used to form the Site Enforcement
Tracking System (SETS). This data includes PRP name and
address, a company contact person, the date the notice was
issued, and the related CERCLA site name and identification
number. SETS was created to track PRP identification at
both NPL (National Priority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS
does not address the range of other administrative duties re-
lated to tracking the PRP.
Specifications: Also available in set of 3 report PC E99/MF
E99, PB91-131144. Supersedes PB90-243478. See also
PB91-131151 and PB91-131177. 5p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Oregon,
Waste disposal, Coordinated procurement, Directories, Site
Enforcement Tracking System, Superfund, Remedial action,
Potentially responsible parties.
0731 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
Listing by Site for Oregon
Order Number PB91-171033CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 5 Apr 91
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issued a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP). Data from this notice letter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
This data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number. SETS was
created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
ority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS does not address the
range of other administrative duties related to tracking the
PRP. The site report is designed to provide PRP information
linked by the associated site, which appears according to the
state where the site is located.
Specifications: Also available in set of 3 reports PC E99/
MF E99, PB91-171017. Supersedes PB91-131169. See also
PB91-171025 and PB91-171041. 7p.
Subject Index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste dis-
posal, Superfund, Notification procedures, Directories,
Oregon, Site Enforcement Tracking System, Potentially re-
sponsible parties.
0732 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
Listing by Site for Pennsylvania
Order Number PB90-243015CDH, price: PC A07/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 2 Aug 90
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP). Data from this notice letter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
The data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number. SETS was
created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
ority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS does not address the
range of other administrative duties related to tracking the
PRP. These lists (updated quarterly) represent EPA's prelimi-
nary findings on the identities of potentially responsible par-
ties. Inclusion on these lists does not constitute a final deter-
mination concerning the liability of any party for the hazard or
contamination at any CERCLA site. The site report is de-
signed to provide PRP information linked by the associated
site, which appears according to Pennsylvania where the site
is located.
Specifications: Also available in set of 5 reports PC E99/
MF E99, PB90-242983. See also PB90-243007 and PB90-
243023. 140p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Pennsylva-
nia, Waste disposal, Coordinated procurement, Directories,
Site Enforcement Tracking System, Superfund, Remedial
action.
0733 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
Listing by Site for Pennsylvania
Order Number PB91-130666CDH, price: PC A10/MF A02
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 19 Dec 90
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP) for the state of Pennsylvania.
Data from this notice letter is used to form the Site Enforce-
ment Tracking System (SETS). This data includes PRP name
and address, a company contact person, the date the notice
was issued, and the related CERCLA site name and identifi-
cation number. SETS was created to track PRP identification
at both NPL (National Priority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS
does not address the range of other administrative duties re-
lated to tracking the PRP.
Specifications: Also available in set of 5 reports PC E99/
MF E99, PB91-130633. Supersedes PB90-243015. See also
PB91-130658 and PB91-130674. 208p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Pennsylva-
nia, Waste disposal, Coordinated procurement, Directories,
Site Enforcement Tracking System, Superfund, Remedial
action, Potentially responsible parties.
132
-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Enforcement
0734 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
Listing by Site for Pennsylvania
Order Number PB91-170571CDH, price: PC A10/MF A02
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 5 Apr 91
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issued a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP). Data from this notice letter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
This data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number. SETS was
created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
ority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS does not address the
range of other administrative duties related to tracking the
PRP. The site report is designed to provide PRP information
linked by the associated site, which appears according to the
state where the site is located.
Specifications: Also available in set of 5 reports PC E99/
MF E99, PB91-170548. Supersedes PB91-130666. See also
PB91-170658 and PB91-170589. 220p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste dis-
posal, Superfund, Notification procedures, Directories, Penn-
sylvania, Site Enforcement Tracking System, Potentially re-
sponsible parties.
0735 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
Listing by Site for Puerto Rico
Order Number PB90-242975CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 2 Aug 90
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP). Data from this notice letter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
The data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number. SETS was
created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
ority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS does not address the
range of other administrative duties related to tracking the
PRP. These lists (updated quarterly) represent EPA's prelimi-
nary findings on the identities of potentially responsible par-
ties. Inclusion on these lists does not constitute a final deter-
mination concerning the liability of any party for the hazard or
contamination at any CERCLA site. The site report is de-
signed to provide PRP information linked by the associated
site, which appears according to Puerto Rico where the site
is located.
Specifications: Also available in set of 3 reports PC E99/
MF E99, PB90-242942. See also PB90-242967. 6p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Puerto Rico,
Coordinated procurement, Directories, Waste disposal, Site
Enforcement Tracking System, Remedial action, Superfund.
0736 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
Listing by Site for Puerto Rico
Order Number PB91-130625CDH, price: PC A01/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 20 Dec 90
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP) for Puerto Rico. Data from this
notice letter is used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking
System (SETS). This data includes PRP name and address,
a company contact person, the date the notice was issued,
and the related CERCLA site name and identification
number. SETS was created to track PRP identification at
both NPL (National Priority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS
does not address the range of other administrative duties re-
lated to tracking the PRP.
Specifications: Also available in set of 3 reports PC E99/
MF E99, PB91-130591. Supersedes PB90-242975. See also
PB91-130617. 4p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste dis-
posal, Coordinated procurement, Directories, Site Enforce-
ment Tracking System, Superfund, Remedial action, Poten-
tially responsible parties.
0737 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
Listing by Site for Puerto Rico
Order Number PB91-170530CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 5 Apr 91
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issued a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP). Data from this notice letter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
This data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number. SETS was
created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
ority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS does not address the
range of other administrative duties related to tracking the
PRP. The site report is designed to provide PRP information
linked by the associated site, which appears according to the
state where the site is located.
Specifications: Also available in set of 3 reports PC E99/
MF E99, PB91-170506. Supersedes PB91-130625. See also
PB91-170522. 6p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste dis-
posal, Superfund, Notification procedures, Directories, Puerto
Rico, Site Enforcement Tracking System, Potentially respon-
sible parties.
133
-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Enforcement
0738 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
Listing by Site for Region 1
Order Number PB92-173111CDH, price: Call for price
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; Apr 92
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Managment Staff issue a notice letter to the potential-
ly responsible party (PRP). Data from the notice letter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
The data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number. SETS was
created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
orities List) and non-NPL sites. SETS does not address the
range of other administrative duties related to tracking the
PRP. The site report is designed to provide PRP information
linked by the associated site, which appears according to the
state where the site is located. Region 1 includes Connecti-
cut, Massachusetts, Maine, New Hampshire, Rhode Island
and Vermont.
Specifications: Supersedes PB92-139534. 874p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste disposal, Haz-
ardous materials, Directories, Site Enforcement Tracking
System, Potentially responsible parties, EPA region 1.
0739 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
Listing by Site for Region 1
Order Number PB92-220029CDH, price: Call for price
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; Jul 92
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP). Data from the notice letter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
The data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number. SETS was
created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
ority List) and non-NPL sites.
Specifications: Supersedes PB92-173111. 882p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Financial
management, Law enforcement, Tracking, Superfund, Reme-
dial Action.
0740 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
Listing by Site for Region 1
Order Number PB93-177145CDH, price: Call for price
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; Apr 93
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP). Data from the notice letter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
The data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number.
Specifications: Also available in set of 10 reports PC A99,
PB93-177137. Supersedes PB93-134203. See also PB93-
177152. 1194p.
Subject index keywords: Law enforcement, Superfund,
Sites, Waste management, Potential responsible party.
0741 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
Listing by Site for Region 1, January 22, 1992
Order Number PB92-139534CDH, price: PC A12
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 22 Jan 92
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un^-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP). Data from the notice letter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
The data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number. SETS was
created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
ority List) and non-NPL sites.
Specifications: Supersedes PB92-105246. 258p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste dis-
posal, Directories, Superfund, Potentially responsible parties,
USEPA region 1.
0742 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
Listing by Site for Region 1. Volume 1
Order Number PB93-134203CDH, price: Call for price
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 9 Dec 92
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP). Data from this notice letter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
This data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number. SETS was
created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
ority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS does not address the
range of other administrative duties related to tracking the
PRP.
Specifications: Also available in set of 10 reports PC A99,
PB93-134195. Supersedes PB92-220029. See also Volume
2, PB93-134211. 1188p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Remedial action,
Waste disposal, Directories, Hazardous materials, Site En-
forcement Tracking System, Potentially responsible parties.
134
-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Enforcement
0743 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)- PRP
Listing by Site for Region 2
Order Number PB92-173129CDH, price: PC A24
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; Apr 92
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP). Data from the notice letter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)
The data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number. SETS was
created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
orities List) and nori-NPL sites. SETS does not address the
range of other administrative duties related to tracking the
PRP. The site report is designed to provide PRP information
linked by the associated site, which appears according to the
state where the site is located. Region 2 includes New
Jersey, New York, Puerto Rico, and Virgin Islands.
Specifications: Supersedes PB92-139542. 572p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste disposal, Haz-
ardous materials, Directories, Site Enforcement Tracking
System, Potentially responsible parties, EPA region 2.
0744 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
Listing by Site for Region 2
Order Number PB92-220037CDH, price: PC A25/MF A06
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; Jul 92
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP). Data from the notice letter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)
The data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number. SETS was
created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
ority List) and non-NPL sites.
Specifications: Supersedes PB92-173129. 577p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Financial
management, Law enforcement, Tracking, Superfund, Reme-
dial Action.
0745 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
Listing by Site for Region 2
Order Number PB93-177152CDH, price: PC A24
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; Apr 93
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP). Data from the notice letter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
The data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number.
Specifications: Also available in set of 10 reports PC A99,
PB93-177137. Supersedes PB93-134211. See also PB93-
177145 and PB93-177160. 575p.
Subject index keywords: Law enforcement, Superfund,
Sites, Waste management, Potential responsible party.
0746 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
Listing by Site for Region 2, January 22, 1992
Order Number PB92-139542CDH, price: PC A17
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 22 Jan 92
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP). Data from the notice letter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
The data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number. SETS was
created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
ority List) and non-NPL sites. Region 2 includes New Jersey,
New York, Puerto Rico, and Virgin Islands. There are no
sites in this state/territory at this time.
Specifications: Supersedes PB92-105253. 387p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste dis-
posal, Directories, Superfund, Potentially responsible parties,
US EPA region 2.
0747 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
Listing by Site for Region 2. Volume 2
Order Number PB93-134211CDH, price: PC A24
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 9 Dec 92
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP). Data from this notice letter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
This data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number. SETS was
created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
ority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS does not address the
range of other administrative duties related to tracking the
PRP.
Specifications: Also available in set of 10 reports PC A99,
PB93-134195. Supersedes PB92-220037. See also Volume
1, PB93-134203 and Volume 3, PB93-134229. 574p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Remedial action,
Waste disposal, Directories, Hazardous materials, Site En-
forcement Tracking System, Potentially responsible parties.
135
-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Enforcement
0748 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
Listing by Site for Region 3
Order Number PB92-173137CDH, price: PC A22
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; Apr 92
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP). Data from the notice letter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
The data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number. SETS was
created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
orities List) and non-NPL sites. SETS does not address the
range of other administrative duties related to tracking the
PRP. The site report is designed to provide PRP information
linked by the associated site, which appears according to the
state where the site is located. Region 3 includes Delaware,
District of Columbia, Maryland, Pennsylvania, Virginia, and
West Virginia.
Specifications: Supersedes PB92-139559. 525p.
Subject Index keywords: Superfund, Waste disposal, Haz-
ardous materials, Directories, Site Enforcement Tracking
System, Potentially responsible parties, EPA region 3.
0749 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
Listing by Site for Region 3
Order Number PB93-177160CDH, price: Call for price
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; Apr 93
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP). Data from the notice letter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
The data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number.
Specifications: Also available in set of 10 reports PC A99,
PB93-177137. Supersedes PB93-134229. See also PB93-
177152 and PB93-177178. 616p.
Subject Index keywords: Law enforcement, Superfund,
Sites, Waste management, Potential responsible party.
0750 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
Listing by Site for Region 3, January 22,1992
Order Number PB92-139559CDH, price: PC A16
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 22 Jan 92
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP). Data from the notice letter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
The data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number. SETS was
created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
ority List) and non-NPL sites. Region 3 includes Delaware,
District of Columbia, Maryland, Pennsylvania, Virginia, and
West Virginia. There are no sites in the federal district at this
time.
Specifications: Supersedes PB92-105261. 372p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste dis-
posal, Directories, Superfund, Potentially responsible parties,
USEPA region 3.
0751 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
Listing by Site for Region 3. Volume 3
Order Number PB93-134229CDH, price: PC A25
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 9 Dec 92
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP). Data from this notice letter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
This data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number. SETS was
created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
ority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS does not address the
range of other administrative duties related to tracking the
PRP.
Specifications: Also available in set of 10 reports PC A99,
PB93-134195. Supersedes PB92-220045. See also Volume
2, PB93-134211 and Volume 4, PB93-134237. 588p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Remedial action,
Waste disposal, Directories, Hazardous materials, Site En-
forcement Tracking System, Potentially responsible parties.
0752 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
Listing by Site for Region 4
Order Number PB92-173145CDH, price: PC A16
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; Apr 92
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP). Data from the notice letter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
The data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number. SETS was
created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
orities List) and non-NPL sites. SETS does not address the
range of other administrative duties related to tracking the
PRP. The site report is designed to provide PRP information
linked by the associated site, which appears according to the
state where the site is located. Region 4 includes Alabama,
136
-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Enforcement
Florida, Georgia, Kentucky, Mississippi, North Carolina, South
Carolina, and Tennessee.
Specifications: Supersedes PB92-139567. 352p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste disposal, Haz-
ardous materials, Directories, Site Enforcement Tracking
System, Potentially responsible parties, EPA region 4.
0753 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
Listing by Site for Region 4
Order Number PB92-220052CDH, price: PC A18/MF A04
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; Jul 92
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP). Data from the notice letter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
The data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number. SETS was
created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
ority List) and non-NPL sites.
Specifications: Supersedes PB92-173145. 407p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Financial
management, Law enforcement, Tracking, Superfund, Reme-
dial Action.
0754 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
Listing by Site for Region 4
Order Number PB93-177178CDH, price: Call for price
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; Apr 93
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP). Data from the notice letter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
The data includes PRP name and address, company contact
person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number.
Specifications: Also available in set of 10 reports PC A99,
PB93-177137. Supersedes PB93-134237. See also PB93-
177160 and PB93-177186. 842p.
Subject index keywords: Law enforcement, Superfund,
Sites, Waste management, Potential responsible party.
0755 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
Listing by Site for Region 4, January 22, 1992
Order Number PB92-139567CDH, price: PC A12
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 22 Jan 92
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP). Data from the notice letter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
The data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number. SETS was
created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
ority List) and non-NPL sites. These lists for Region 4 in-
cludes Alabama, Florida, Georgia, Kentucky, Mississippi,
North Carolina, South Carolina, and Tennessee.
Specifications: Supersedes PB92-105279. 256p.
Subject index keywords: Waste disposal, Hazardous mate-
rials, Directories, Superfund.
0756 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
Listing by Site for Region 4. Volume 4
Order Number PB93-134237CDH, price: Call for price
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 9 Dec 92
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP). Data from this notice letter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
This data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number. SETS was
created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
ority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS does not address the
range of other administrative duties related to tracking the
PRP.
Specifications: Also available in set of 10 reports PC A99,
PB93-134195. Supersedes PB92-220052. See also Volume
3, PB93-134229 and Volume 5, PB93-134245. 656p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Remedial action,
Waste disposal, Directories, Hazardous materials, Site En-
forcement Tracking System, Potentially responsible parties.
0757 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
Listing by Site for Region 5
Order Number PB92-173152CDH, price: Call for price
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; Apr 92
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP). Data from the notice letter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
The data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number. SETS was
created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
orities List) and non-NPL sites. SETS does not address the
range of other administrative duties related to tracking the
PRP. The site report is designed to provide PRP information
linked by the associated site, which appears according to the
state where the site is located. Region 5 includes Illinois, In-
diana, Michigan, Minnesota, Ohio, and Wisconsin.
Specifications: Supersedes PB92-139575. 1022p.
137
-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Enforcement
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste disposal, Haz-
ardous materials, Directories, Site Enforcement Tracking
System, Potentially responsible parties, EPA region 5.
0758 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
Listing by Site for Region 5
Order Dumber PB92-220060CDH, price: Call for price
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; Jul 92
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP). Data from the notice letter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
The data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number. SETS was
created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
ority List) and non-NPL sites.
Specifications: Supersedes PB92-173152. 1462p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Financial
management, Law enforcement, Tracking, Superfund, Reme-
dial Action.
0759 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
Listing by Site for Region 5
Order Number PB93-177186CDH, price: Call for price
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; Apr 93
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP). Data from the notice letter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
The data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number.
Specifications: Also available in set of 10 reports PC A99,
PB93-177137. Supersedes PB93-134245. See also PB93-
177178 and PB93-177194. 1590p.
Subject index keywords: Law enforcement, Superfund,
Sites, Waste management, Potential responsible party.
CERCLA site name and identification number. SETS was
created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
ority List) and non-NPL sites.
Specifications: Supersedes PB92-105287. 720p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste dis-
posal, Directories, Superfund, Potentially responsible parties,
US EPA region 5.
0761 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
Listing by Site for Region 5. Volume 5
Order Number PB93-134245CDH, price: Call for price
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 9 Dec 92
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP). Data from this notice letter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
This data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number. SETS was
created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
ority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS does not address the
range of other administrative duties related to tracking the
PRP.
Specifications: Also available in set of 10 reports PC A99,
PB93-134195. Supersedes PB92-220060. See also Volume
4, PB93-134237 and Volume 6, PB93-134252. 1128p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Remedial action,
Waste disposal, Directories, Hazardous materials, Site En-
forcement Tracking System, Potentially responsible parties.
0762 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
Listing by Site for Region 6
Order Number PB92-173160CDH, price: PC A17
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; Apr 92
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP). Data from the notice letter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
The data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number. SETS was
created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
orities List) and non-NPL sites. SETS does not address the
range of other administrative duties related to tracking the
PRP. The site report is designed to provide PRP information
linked by the associated site, which appears according to the
state where the site is located. Region 6 includes Arkansas,
Louisiana, New Mexico, Oklahoma, and Texas.
Specifications: Supersedes PB92-139583. 394p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste disposal, Haz-
ardous materials, Directories, Site Enforcement Tracking
System, Potentially responsible parties, EPA region 6.
-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Enforcement
0763 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
Listing by Site for Region 6
Order Number PB92-220078CDH, price: PC A17/MF A04
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; Jul 92
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP). Data from the notice letter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
The data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number. SETS was
created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
ority List) and non-NPL sites.
Specifications: Supersedes PB92-173160. 398p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Financial
management, Law enforcement, Tracking, Superfund, Reme-
dial Action.
0764 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
Listing by Site for Region 6
Order Number PB93-177194CDH, price: PC A17
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; Apr 93
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP). Data from the notice letter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
The data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number.
Specifications: Also available in set of 10 reports PC A99,
PB93-177137. Supersedes PB93-134252. See also PB93-
177186 and PB93-177202. 398p.
Subject index keywords: Law enforcement, Superfund,
Sites, Waste management, Potential responsible party.
0765 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
Listing by Site for Region 6, January 22, 1992
Order Number PB92-139583CDH, price: PC A12
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 22 Jan 92
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP). Data from the notice letter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
The data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number. SETS was
created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
ority List) and non-NPL sites.
Specifications: Supersedes PB92-105295. 269p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste dis-
posal, Directories, Superfund, Potentially responsible parties,
US EPA region 6.
0766 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
Listing by Site for Region 6. Volume 6
Order Number PB93-134252CDH, price: PC A17
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 9 Dec 92
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP). Data from this notice letter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
This data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number. SETS was
created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
ority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS does not address the
range of other administrative duties related to tracking the
PRP.
Specifications: Also available in set of 10 reports PC A99,
PB93-134195. Supersedes PB92-220078. See also Volume
5, PB93-134245 and Volume 7, PB93-134260. 396p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Remedial action,
Waste disposal, Directories, Hazardous materials, Site En-
forcement Tracking System, Potentially responsible parties.
0767 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
Listing by Site for Region 7
Order Number PB92-173178CDH, price: PC A17
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; Apr 92
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP). Data from the notice letter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
The data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number. SETS was
created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
orities List) and non-NPL sites. SETS does not address the
range of other administrative duties related to tracking the
PRP. The site report is designed to provide PRP information
linked by the associated site, which appears according to the
state where the site is located. Region 7 includes Iowa,
Kansas, Missouri, and Nebraska.
Specifications: Supersedes PB92-139591. 398p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste disposal, Haz-
ardous materials, Directories, Site Enforcement Tracking
System, Potentially responsible parties, EPA region 7.
139
-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Enforcement
0768 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
Listing by Site for Region 7
Order Number PB92-220086CDH, price: PC A18/MF A04
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; Jul 92
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP). Data from the notice letter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
The data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number. SETS was
created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
ority List) and non-NPL sites.
Specifications: Supersedes PB92-173178. 404p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Financial
management, Law enforcement, Tracking, Superfund, Reme-
dial Action.
0769 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
Listing by Site for Region 7
Order Number PB93-177202CDH, price: PC A18
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; Apr 93
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP). Data from the notice letter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
The data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number.
Specifications: Also available in set of 10 reports PC A99,
PB93-177137. Supersedes PB93-134260. See also PB93-
177194 and PB93-177210. 41 Op.
Subject Index keywords: Law enforcement, Superfund,
Sites, Waste management, Potential responsible party.
0770 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
Listing by Site for Region 7, January 22, 1992
Order Number PB92-139591CDH, price: PC A12
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 22 Jan 92
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP). Data from the notice letter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
The data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number. SETS was
created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
ority List) and non-NPL sites.
Specifications: Supersedes PB92-105303. 270p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste dis-
posal, Directories, Superfund, Potentially responsible parties,
USEPA region 7.
0771 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
Listing by Site for Region 7. Volume 7
Order Number PB93-134260CDH, price: PC A17
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 9 Dec 92
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP). Data from this notice letter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
This data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number. SETS was
created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
ority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS does not address the
range of other administrative duties related to tracking the
PRP.
Specifications: Also available in set of 10 reports PC A99,
PB93-134195. Supersedes PB92-220086. See also Volume
6, PB93-134252 and Volume 8, PB93-134278. 400p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Remedial action,
Waste disposal, Directories, Hazardous materials, Site En-
forcement Tracking System, Potentially responsible parties.
0772 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
Listing by Site for Region 8
Order Number PB92-173186CDH, price: PC A12
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; Apr 92
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP). Data from the notice letter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
The data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number. SETS was
created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
orities List) and non-NPL sites. SETS does not address the
range of other administrative duties related to tracking the
PRP. The site report is designed to provide PRP information
linked by the associated site, which appears according to the
state where the site is located. Region 8 includes Colorado,
Montana, North Dakota, South Dakota, Utah, and Wyoming.
Specifications: Supersedes PB92-139609. 265p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Hazardous materials,
Waste disposal, Directories, Site Enforcement Tracking
System, Potentially responsible parties, EPA region 8.
140
-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Enforcement
0773 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
Listing by Site for Region 8
Order Number PB92-220094CDH, price: PC A14/MF A03
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; Jul 92
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP). Data from the notice letter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
The data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number. SETS was
created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
ority List) and non-NPL sites.
Specifications: Supersedes PB92-173186. 302p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Financial
management, Law enforcement, Tracking, Superfund, Reme-
dial Action.
0774 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
Listing by Site for Region 8
Order Number PB93-177210CDH, price: PC A16
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; Apr 93
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP). Data from the notice letter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
The data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number.
Specifications: Also available in set of 10 reports PC A99,
PB93-177137. Supersedes PB93-134278. See also PB93-
177202 and PB93-177228. 359p.
Subject index keywords: Law enforcement, Superfund,
Sites, Waste management, Potential responsible party.
0775 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
Listing by Site for Region 8, January 22, 1992
Order Number PB92-139609CDH, price: PC A06
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 22 Jan 92
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP). Data from the notice letter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
The data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number. SETS was
created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
ority List) and non-NPL sites.
Specifications: Supersedes PB92-105311. 117p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste dis-
posal, Directories, Superfund, Potentially responsible parties,
USEPA region 8.
0776 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
Listing by Site for Region 8. Volume 8
Order Number PB93-134278CDH, price: PC A15
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 9 Dec 92
When expending Superfund monies at a CERGLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP). Data from this notice letter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
This data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number. SETS was
created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
ority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS does not address the
range of other administrative duties related to tracking the
PRP.
Specifications: Also available in set of 10 reports PC A99,
PB93-134195. Supersedes PB92-220094. See also Volume
7, PB93-134260 and Volume 9, PB93-134286. 346p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Remedial action,
Waste disposal, Directories, Hazardous materials, Site En-
forcement Tracking System, Potentially responsible parties.
0777 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
Listing by Site for Region 9
Order Number PB92-173194CDH, price: PC A17
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; Apr 92
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP). Data from the notice letter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
The data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number. SETS was
created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
orities List) and non-NPL sites. SETS does not address the
range of other administrative duties related to tracking the
PRP. The site report is designed to provide PRP information
linked by the associated site, which appears according to the
state where the site is located. Region 9 includes American
Samoa, Arizona, California, Guam, Hawaii, Midway, Nevada,
Northern Marianas, Pacific Islands, Trust Territories, and
Wake Island.
Specifications: Supersedes PB92-139617. 382p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste disposal, Haz-
ardous materials, Directories, Site Enforcement Tracking
System, Potentially responsible parties, EPA region 9.
141
-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Enforcement
0778 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
Listing by Site for Region 9
Order Number PB92-220102CDH, price: PC A18/MF A04
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; Jul 92
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP). Data from the notice letter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
This data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number. SETS was
created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
orities List) and non-NPL sites. SETS does not address the
range of other administrative duties related to tracking the
PRP. Region 9 includes American Samoa, Arizona, Califor-
nia, Guam, Hawaii, Midway, Nevada, Northern Marianas, Pa-
cific Islands, Trust Territories, and Wake Island.
Specifications: Supersedes PB92-173194. 402p.
Subject Index keywords: Superfund, Hazardous materials,
Waste disposal, Remedial action, Directories, Site Enforce-
ment Tracking System, Potentially responsible parties.
0779 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
Listing by Site for Region 9
Order Number PB93-177228CDH, price: PC A20
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; Apr 93
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP). Data from the notice letter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
The data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number.
Specifications: Also available in set of 10 reports PC A99,
PB93-177137. Supersedes PB93-134286. See also PB93-
177210 and PB93-177236. 471 p.
Subject Index keywords: Law enforcement, Superfund,
Sites, Waste management, Potential responsible party.
0780 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
Listing by Site for Region 9, January 22, 1992
Order Number PB92-139617CDH, price: PC A12
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 22 Jan 92
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP). Data from the notice letter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
The data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number. SETS was
created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
ority List) and non-NPL sites. There are no sites in this state/
territory at this time.
Specifications: Supersedes PB92-105329. 261 p.
Subject index keyword:;: Hazardous materials, Waste dis-
posal, Directories, Superfund, Potentially responsible parties,
US EPA region 9.
0781 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
Listing by Site for Region 9. Volume 9
Order Number PB93-134286CDH, price: PC A18
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 9 Dec 92
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP). Data from this notice letter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
This data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number. SETS was
created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
ority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS does not address the
range of other administrative duties related to tracking the
PRP.
Specifications: Also available in set of 10 reports PC A99,
PB93-134195. Supersedes PB92-220102. See also Volume
8, PB93-134278 and Volume 10, PB93-134294. 415p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Remedial action,
Waste disposal, Directories, Hazardous materials, Site En-
forcement Tracking System, Potentially responsible parties.
0782 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
Listing by Site for Region 10
Order Number PB92-173202CDH, price: PC A12
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; Apr 92
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP). Data from the notice letter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
The data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number. SETS was
created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
orities List) and non-NPL sites. SETS does not address the
range of other administrative duties related to tracking the
PRP. The site report is designed to provide PRP information
linked by the associated site, which appears according to the
state where the site is located. Region 10 includes Alaska,
Idaho, Oregon, and Washington.
Specifications: Supersedes PB92-139625. 271 p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste disposal, Haz-
ardous materials, Directories, Site Enforcement Tracking
System, Potentially responsible parties, EPA region 10.
142
-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Enforcement
0783 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
Listing by Site for Region 10
Order Number PB92-220110CDH, price: PC A12/MF A03
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; Jul 92
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP). Data from the notice letter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
The data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number. SETS was
created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
ority List) and non-NPL sites.
Specifications: Supersedes PB92-173202. 274p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Financial
management, Law enforcement, Tracking, Superfund, Reme-
dial Action.
0784 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
Listing by Site for Region 10
Order Number PB93-177236CDH, price: PC A14
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; Apr 93
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP). Data from the notice letter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
The data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number.
Specifications: Also available in set of 10 reports PC A99
PB93-177137. Supersedes PB93-134294. See also PB93-
177228. 312p.
Subject index keywords: Law enforcement, Superfund,
Sites, Waste management, Potential responsible party.
0785 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
Listing by Site for Region 10, January 22, 1992
Order Number PB92-139625CDH, price: PC A13
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 22 Jan 92
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP). Data from the notice letter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
The data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number. SETS was
created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
ority List) and non-NPL sites. Region 10 includes Alaska,
Idaho, Oregon, and Washington. There are no sites in this
state/territory at this time.
Specifications: Supersedes PB92-105337. 282p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste dis-
posal, Directories, Superfund, Potentially responsible parties,
US EPA region 10.
0786 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
Listing by Site for Region 10. Volume 10
Order Number PB93-134294CDH, price: PC A12
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 9 Dec 92
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP). Data from this notice letter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
This data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number. SETS was
created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
ority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS does not address the
range of other administrative duties related to tracking the
PRP.
Specifications: Also available in set of 10 reports PC A99,
PB93-134195. Supersedes PB92-220110. See also Volume
9, PB93-134286. 274p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Remedial action,
Waste disposal, Directories, Hazardous materials, Site En-
forcement Tracking System, Potentially responsible parties.
0787 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
Listing by Site for Rhode Island
Order Number PB90-242926CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 2 Aug 90
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP). Data from this notice letter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
The data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number. SETS was
created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
ority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS does not address the
range of other administrative duties related to tracking the
PRP. These lists (updated quarterly) represent EPA's prelimi-
nary findings on the identities of potentially responsible par-
ties. Inclusion on these lists does not constitute a final deter-
mination concerning the liability of any party for the hazard or
contamination at any CERCLA site. The site report is de-
signed to provide PRP information linked by the associated
site, which appears according to Rhode Island where the site
is located.
143
-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Enforcement
Specifications: Also available in set of 6 reports PC E99/
MF E99, PB90-242876. See also PB90-242918 and PB90-
242934. 32p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Rhode
Island, Waste disposal, Coordinated procurement, Directo-
ries, Site Enforcement Tracking System, Superfund, Remedi-
al action.
0788 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
Listing by Site for Rhode Island
Order Number PB91-130575CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 19 Dec 90
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP) for the state of Rhode Island.
Data from this notice letter is used to form the Site Enforce-
ment Tracking System (SETS). This data includes PRP name
and address, a company contact person, the date the notice
was issued, and the related CERCLA site name and identifi-
cation number. SETS was created to track PRP identification
at both NPL (National Priority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS
does not address the range of other administrative duties re-
lated to tracking the PRP.
Specifications: Also available in set of 6 reports PC E99/
MF E99, PB91-130526. Supersedes PB90-242926. See also
PB91-130567 and PB91-130583. 38p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Rhode
Island, Waste disposal, Coordinated procurement, Directo-
ries, Site Enforcement Tracking System, Superfund, Remedi-
al action, Potentially responsible parties.
0789 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
Listing by Site for Rhode Island
Order Number PB91-170480CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 5 Apr 91
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issued a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP). Data from this notice letter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
This data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number. SETS was
created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
ority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS does not address the
range of other administrative duties related to tracking the
PRP. The site report is designed to provide PRP information
linked by the associated site, which appears according to the
state where the site is located.
Specifications: Also available in set of 6 reports PC E99/
MF E99, PB91-170431. Supersedes PB91-130575. See also
PB91-170472 and PB91-170498. 40p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste dis-
posal, Superfund, Notification procedures, Directories, Rhode
Island, Site Enforcement Tracking System, Potentially re-
sponsible parties.
0790 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
Listing by Site for South Carolina
Order Number PB90-243114CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 2 Aug 90
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP). Data from this notice letter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
The data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number. SETS was
created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
ority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS does not address the
range of other administrative duties related to tracking the
PRP. These lists (updated quarterly) represent EPA's prelimi-
nary findings on the identities of potentially responsible par-
ties. Inclusion on these lists does not constitute a final deter-
mination concerning the liability of any party for the hazard or
contamination at any CERCLA site. The site report is de-
signed to provide PRP information linked by the associated
site, which appears according to South Carolina where the
site is located.
Specifications: Also available in set of 8 reports PC E99/
MF E99, PB90-243049. See also PB90-243106 and PB90-
243122. 24p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, South Caro-
lina, Waste disposal, Coordinated procurement, Directories,
Site Enforcement Tracking System, Superfund, Remedial
action.
0791 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
Listing by Site for South Carolina
Order Number PB91-130757CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 19 Dec 90
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP) for the state of South Carolina.
Data from this notice letter is used to form the Site Enforce-
ment Tracking System (SETS). This data includes PRP name
and address, a company contact person, the date the notice
was issued, and the related CERCLA site name and identifi-
cation number. SETS was created to track PRP identification
at both NPL (National Priority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS
does not address the range of other administrative duties re-
lated to tracking the PRP.
Specifications: Also available in set of 8 reports PC E99/
MF E99, PB91-130690. Supersedes PB90-243114. See also
PB91-130740 and PB91-130765. 23p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, South Caro-
lina, Waste disposal, Coordinated procurement, Directories,
144
-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Enforcement
Site Enforcement Tracking System, Superfund, Remedial
action, Potentially responsible parties.
°7.9.2 Sitf Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
Listing by Site for South Carolina
Order Number PB91-170670CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 5 Apr 91
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hens.ve Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
2th nLo?' i , ™S> C0nduct a search to identify Parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issued a notice letter to the poten-
lally responsible party (PRP). Data from this notice letter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)
This data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
^lo£?rA °n' the date the notice was issued, and the related
UERCLA site name and identification number. SETS was
created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
ority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS does not address the
DDDSTU • administrative duties related to tracking the
L^HK ^'t6 rep°? is desi9ned to provide PRP information
linked by the associated site, which appears according to the
state where the site is located.
s: Also available in set of 8 reports PC E99/
PRQ-I i™«R;1~1?S?«; SuPersedes PB91-130757. See also
PB91-170654 and PB91 -170688. 26p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste dis-
posal, Superfund, Notification procedures, Directories South
Carolina, Site Enforcement Tracking System, Potentially re-
sponsible parties.
0793 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
Listing by Site for South Dakota
Order Number PB90-243353CDH, price: PC A01/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 2 Aug 90
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
»ri», nV11?' ,EP-A must cond"ct a search to identify parties
with Potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
lally responsible party (PRP). Data from this notice letter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)
The data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
ocn^f/f°n- the date the notice was issued, and the related
otHOLA site name and identification number. SETS was
created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
ority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS does not address the
nanDe-rK °th,er administrative duties related to tracking the
PRP These lists (updated quarterly) represent EPA's prelimi-
nary findings on the identities of potentially responsible par-
ties. Inclusion on these lists does not constitute a final deter-
mination concerning the liability of any party for the hazard or
contamination at any CERCLA site. The site report is de-
signed to provide PRP information linked by the associated
site, which appears according to South Dakota where the
site is located.
s: Also avai|able in set of 6 reports PC E99/
,9' PB9°-243312- See also PB90-243346 and PB90-
243361. 4p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, South
Dakota, Waste disposal, Coordinated procurement, Directo-
ries, Site Enforcement Tracking System, Superfund, Remedi-
al action.
0794 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
Listing by Site for South Dakota
Order Number PB91-131045CDH, price: PC A01/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 19 Dec 90
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP) for the state of South Dakota.
Data from this notice letter is used to form the Site Enforce-
ment Tracking System (SETS). This data includes PRP name
and address, a company contact person, the date the notice
was issued, and the related CERCLA site name and identifi-
cation number. SETS was created to track PRP identification
at both NPL (National Priority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS
does not address the range of other administrative duties re-
lated to tracking the PRP.
Specifications: Also available in set of 6 reports PC E99/
MF E99, PB91-131003. Supersedes PB90-243353. See also
PB91-131037 and PB91-131052. 4p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, South
Dakota, Waste disposal, Coordinated procurement, Directo-
ries, Site Enforcement Tracking System, Superfund, Remedi-
al action, Potentially responsible parties.
0795 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
Listing by Site for South Dakota
Order Number PB91-170910CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 5 Apr 91
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issued a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP). Data from this notice letter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)
This data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number. SETS was
created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
ority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS does not address the
range of other administrative duties related to tracking the
PRP. The site report is designed to provide PRP information
linked by the associated site, which appears according to the
state where the site is located.
Specifications: Also available in set of 6 reports PC E99/
MF E99, PB91-170878. Supersedes PB91-131045. See also
PB91-170902 and PB91-170928. 6p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste dis-
posal, Superfund, Notification procedures, Directories, South
. Dakota, Site Enforcement Tracking System, Potentially re-
sponsible parties.
145
-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Enforcement
0796 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
Listing by Site for Tennessee
Order Number PB90-243122CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 2 Aug 90
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP). Data from this notice letter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
The data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number. SETS was
created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
ority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS does not address the
range of other administrative duties related to tracking the
PRP. These lists (updated quarterly) represent EPA's prelimi-
nary findings on the identities of potentially responsible par-
ties. Inclusion on these lists does not constitute a final deter-
mination concerning the liability of any party for the hazard or
contamination at any CERCLA site. The site report is de-
signed to provide PRP information linked by the associated
site, which appears according to Tennessee where the site is
located.
Specifications: Also available in set of 8 reports PC E99/
MF E99, PB90-243049. See also PB90-243114. 9p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Tennessee,
Waste disposal, Coordinated procurement, Directories, Site
Enforcement Tracking System, Superfund, Remedial action.
0797 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
Listing by Site for Tennessee
Order Number PB91-130765CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 19 Dec 90
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site. EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP) for the state of Tennessee.
Data from this notice letter is used to form the Site Enforce-
ment Tracking System (SETS). This data includes PRP name
and address, a company contact person, the date the notice
was issued, and the related CERCLA site name and identifi-
cation number. SETS was created to track PRP identification
at both NPL (National Priority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS
does not address the range of other administrative duties re-
lated to tracking the PRP.
Specifications: Also available in set of 8 reports PC E99/
MF E99, PB91-130690. Supersedes PB90-243122. See also
PB91-130757. 9p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Tennessee,
Waste disposal, Coordinated procurement, Directories, Site
Enforcement Tracking System, Superfund, Remedial action,
Potentially responsible parties.
0798 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
Listing by Site for Tennessee
Order Number PB91-170688CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 5 Apr 91
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issued a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP). Data from this notice letter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
This data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number. SETS was
created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
ority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS does not address the
ranqe of other administrative duties related to tracking the
PRp The site report is designed to provide PRP information
linked by the associated site, which appears according to the
state where the site is located.
Specifications: Also available in set of 8 reports PC E99/
MF E99, PB91-170605. Supersedes PB91-130765. See also
PB91-170670. 11 p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste dis-
posal Superfund, Notification procedures, Directories, Ten-
nessee, Site Enforcement Tracking System, Potentially re-
sponsible parties.
0799 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
Listing by Site for Texas
Order Number PB90-243254CDH, price: PC A05/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 2 Aug 90
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP). Data from this notice letter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
The data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number. SETS was
created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
ority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS does not address the
range of other administrative duties related to tracking the
PRP These lists (updated quarterly) represent EPA's prelimi-
nary findings on the identities of potentially responsible par-
ties Inclusion on these lists does not constitute a final deter-
mination concerning the liability of any party for the hazard or
contamination at any CERCLA site. The site report is de-
signed to provide PRP information linked by the associated
site, which appears according to Texas where the site is lo-
cated.
Specifications: Also available in set of 5 reports PC E99/
MF E99, PB90-243205. See also PB90-243247. 89p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Texas,
Waste disposal, Coordinated procurement, Directories, Site
Enforcement Tracking System, Superfund, Remedial action.
146
-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Enforcement
Order Number PB91-130948CDH, price: PC A05/MF A01
wSnSmPr?TUOn Agen°y' Washin9ton- DC. Office of
waste Programs Enforcement; 19 Dec 90
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
fe TSS |™r°"menta' ReSp°nse' ^^Pensation and UaW-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify
°r rem on-
hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten
tally responsible party (PRP) for the state of Texas Date
from this notice letter is used to form the Site Enforcement
Tracking System (SETS). This data includes PRP name and
address, a company contact person, the date the notice was
numSr'sETS w^ ^ ^ ""» -d ^enEaS
both NPI ™ ,- f rfeated *° track PRP identification at
both NPL (National Priority List) and non-NPL sites SETS
°f °ther
: Also available in set of 5 reports PC E99/
slT98' SUPerSSdeS PB90-243254' ^ a'S°
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Texas
SP t8?'' C°ordinated Procurement, Directories, stte
superfund> Remediai
(SETS): PRP
~»* — * •—-..» • vi i «^yv«o
Order Number PB91-170811CDH, price- PC A05/MF A01
WaS"SJ' Pr°tefction A9ency, Washington, DC. Office of
waste Programs Enforcement; 5 Apr 91
^sL^ESn9 ^fn "d m°nieS at a CERCLA Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
=PA must conduct a search to identify parties
financial responsibility for remediation of un-
Wai""»T nazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issued a notice letter to the poten
used oTrm'th6 Party - Data from this notice letteMs
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)
This data includes PRP name and address a company con-
rpRr?T°V date the notice was issued. and the related
Xt A t S* ,name and identification number. SETS was
offty U^Sc\non^PLnSeT°SEfsb^ ^ (Nati°nal P^
^^°^^^^'^^tedto fraSg ISe
PRP. The site report is designed to provide PRP information
,toH 0i*Q ...N;^ appears , ....
E99/
a,so
89p
t °f 5
PB91-130948'
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste dis-
posal Superfund Notification procedures, Directories, Texas,
parties aCkin9 SyStem' P°tentially responsible
0802 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)- PRP
Listing by Site for Trust Territories
Order Number PB90-243445CDH, price: PC A01/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 2 Aug 90
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
u?" tr° »d hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP). Data from this notice letter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)
The data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
^oR??0"' the date the notice was issued, and the related
OhRCLA site name and identification number. SETS was
created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
ority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS does not address the
Lpie-r£ ,er administrative duties related to tracking the
PRP. These lists (updated quarterly) represent EPA's prelimi-
nary findings on the identities of potentially responsible par-
ties. Inclusion on these lists does not constitute a final deter-
mination concerning the liability of any party for the hazard or
contamination at any CERCLA site. The site report is de-
signed to provide PRP information linked by the associated
site, which appears according to Trust Territories where the
site is located.
f£e^f'Cations: Also available in set of 6 reports PC E99/
MF E99, PB90-243387. See also PB90-243437. 5p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Trust Terri-
tory of the Pacific Islands, Waste disposal, Coordinated pro-
curement Directories, Site Enforcement Tracking System
Superfund, Remedial action.
0803 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
Listing by Site for Trust Territories
Order Number PB91-131136CDH, price: PC A01/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 19 Dec 90
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
w 1° f, hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP) for the Trust Territories Data
from this notice letter is used to form the Site Enforcement
Tracking System (SETS). This data includes PRP name and
address, a company contact person, the date the notice was
issued, and the related CERCLA site name and identification
hn£ MO! iTS,- Waf ^reated to track PRP identification at
both NPL (National Priority List) and non-NPL sites SETS
does not address the range of other administrative duties re-
lated to tracking the PRP.
Also ava'lable in set of 6 reports PC E99/
13107a SuPersedes PB90-243445. See also
. 4p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Trust Terri-
tories Waste disposal, Coordinated procurement, Directories
Site Enforcement Tracking System, Superfund, Remediai
action, Potentially responsible parties, Trust Territory of the
Pacific Islands.
147
-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Enforcement
0804 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
Listing by Site for trust Territories ,.„-.„,
Order Number PB91-171009CDH, price: PC A01/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 5 Apr 91
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issued a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP). Data from this notice letter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
This data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number. SETS was
created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
ority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS does not address the
range of other administrative duties related to tracking the
PRP. The site report is designed to provide PRP information
linked by the associated site, which appears according to the
state where the site is located.
Specifications: Also available in set of 6 reports PC E99/
MF E99, PB91 -170944. Supersedes PB91-131136. See also
PB91-170993. 5p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste dis-
posal, Superfund, Notification procedures, Directories, Trust
territory of the Pacific Islands, Site Enforcement Tracking
System, Potentially responsible parties.
0805 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
Listing by Site for Utah
Order Number PB90-243361CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 2 Aug 90
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP). Data from this notice letter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
The data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number. SETS was
created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
ority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS does not address the
range of other administrative duties related to tracking the
PFIP, These lists (updated quarterly) represent EPA's prelimi-
nary findings on the identities of potentially responsible par-
ties. Inclusion on these lists does not constitute a final deter-
mination concerning the liability of any party for the hazard or
contamination at any CERCLA site. The site report is de-
signed to provide PRP information linked by the associated
site, which appears according to Utah where the site is locat-
ed.
Specifications: Also available in set of 6 reports PC E99/
MF E99, PB90-243312. See also PB90-243353 and PB90-
243379.14p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste dis-
posal, Utah, Coordinated procurement, Directories, Site En-
forcement Tracking System, Superfund, Remedial action.
0806 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
Listing by Site for Utah
Order Number PB91-131052CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 19 Dec 90
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letterto the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP) for the state of Utah. Data from
this notice letter is used to form the Site Enforcement Track-
ing System (SETS). This data includes PRP name and ad-
dress, a company contact person, the date the notice was
issued, and the related CERCLA site name and identification
number. SETS was created to track PRP identification at
both NPL (National Priority List) and non-NPL sites SETb
does not address the range of other administrative duties re-
lated to tracking the PRP.
Specifications: Also available in set of 6 reports PC E99/
MF E99, PB91-131003. Supersedes PB90-243361. See also
PB91-131045 and PB91-131060. 14p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Utah, Waste
disposal, Coordinated procurement, Directories, Site Enforce-
ment Tracking System, Superfund, Remedial action, Poten-
tially responsible parties.
0807 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
Listing by Site for Utah
Order Number PB91-170928CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 5 Apr 91
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issued a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP). Data from this notice etter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
This data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number. SETS was
created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
ority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS does not address the
range of other administrative duties related to tracking the
PRP The site report is designed to provide PRP information
linked by the associated site, which appears according to the
state where the site is located.
Specifications: Also available in set of 6 reports PC E99/
MF E99, PB91-170878. Supersedes PB91-131052. See also
PB91-170910 and PB91-170936. 16p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste dis-
posal Superfund, Notification procedures, Directories, Utah,
Site Enforcement Tracking System, Potentially responsible
parties.
148
-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Enforcement
0808 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)- PRP
Listing by Site for Vermont
Order Number PB90-242934CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
\A/naVc!t0Tental Protection Aaency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 2 Aug 90
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
itTAct? SrFpTental ResP°nse' Compensation and Liabil-
Jy Act) site EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
SSrSTJ? fTCial resP°nsibility *>r remediation of un
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten
any esDons,ble party (PRP). Data from this notice letter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS?
The data mcludes PRP name and address a company con-
aC°"'tthe ^ the n°tice was issued> anSTe related
t ?a£? and iderrtifica«on number. SETS was
? H PRM identification at both NPL (National P?
? ?£ nTNPL SitSS- SETS does not address the
PRP Thl ,ertadm!?iStrative duties related to ^king the
PRP. These lists (updated quarterly) represent EPA's orelimi
nary findings on the identities of poten'afy Iponsib'e S-"
^Inclusion on these lists does not constitute a final deter-
rnmat,on concernmg the liability of any party for the hazard or
contam.nat.on at any CERCLA site. The site report is de-
11 1 hPr°Vlde PRP information linked by the associated
Seated aPPearS accordin9 to Vermont where the site is
oS: Also availab'e in set of 6 reports PC E99/
9, PB90-242876. See also PB90-242926 Up
, **yw°rds: Hazardous materials, Vermont,
Enfo T ' Coordinated Procurement, Directories, Site
Enforcement Tracking System, Superfund, Remedial action.
0809 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
Listing by Site for Vermont IOM-KK
Order Number PB91-130583CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Wa^nnS' Pr°t€fion A9ency- Washington, DC. Office of
waste Programs Enforcement; 19 Dec 90
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
£AC? lrrFPAenta' ResP°nse' Compensation and Liabil-
2th nn^nr , * "^ C°nduct a search to iden«fy Parties
^ntrnM H h 'T^' resPonsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten
mm hcP°nf 'e,Party (PRP) for the state of Vermont Data
Si %n0tT 'etter JS US6d to form the Site Enforcement
Tracking System (SETS). This data includes PRP name and
Sn H ' 3H ct°mpany contact Person, the date the notice was
ed °ERCLA Site name and identification
NPI ™ *• nreated to track PRP identification at
t (Nat,onal Pnority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS
to°
PB9
: Also avai|able in set of 6 reports PC E99/
See alo
, keywords: Hazardous materials, Vermont
' C,Oordinated Procurement, Directories, S"te
°^9 SyStem> SuPerfund- Remedial action,
responsible parties.
0810 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)- PRP
Listing by Site for Vermont
Order Number PB91-170498CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 5 Apr 91
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issued a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP). Data from this notice letter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)
This data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
^L£??°n' the date tne notice was issued- and the related
OhRCLA site name and identification number. SETS was
created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
ority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS does not address the
range of other administrative duties related to tracking the
PRP The site report is designed to provide PRP information
linked by the associated site, which appears according to the
state where the site is located.
Specifications: Also available in set of 6 reports PC E99/
MF E99, PB91-170431. Supersedes PB91-130583. See also
PB91-170480. 11 p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste dis-
posal, Superfund, Notification procedures, Directories Ver-
mont, Site Enforcement Tracking System, Potentially respon-
sible parties.
0811 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)- PRP
Listing by Site for Virginia
Order Number PB91-130674CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 19 Dec 90
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP) for the state of Virginia. Data
from this notice letter is used to form the Site Enforcement
Tracking System (SETS). This data includes PRP name and
address, a company contact person, the date the notice was
issued, and the related CERCLA site name and identification
JUUU MO, ^!~S W3S °reated to track PRP identification at
both NPL (National Priority List) and non-NPL sites SETS
does not address the range of other administrative duties re-
lated to tracking the PRP.
Specifications: Also available in set of 5 reports PC E99/
MF E99, PB91-130633. Supersedes PB90-243023. See also
PB91 -130666 and PB91 -130682. 25p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Virginia
Waste disposal, Coordinated procurement, Directories Site
Enforcement Tracking System, Superfund, Remedial action,
Potentially responsible parties.
149
-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Enforcement
0812 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
Listing by Site for Virginia ,..,-*„,
Order Number PB91-170589CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 5 Apr 91
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issued a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP). Data from this notice letter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
This data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number. SETS was
created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
ority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS does not address the
range of other administrative duties related to tracking the
PRP. The site report is designed to provide PRP information
linked by the associated site, which appears according to the
state where the site is located.
Specifications: Also available in set of 5 reports PC E99/
MF E99, PB91-170548. Supersedes PB91-130674. See also
PB91-170571 and PB91-170597. 32p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste dis-
posal, Superfund, Notification procedures, Directories, Virgin-
ia, Site Enforcement Tracking System, Potentially responsible
parties.
0813 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
Listing by Site for Washington
Order Number PB90-243486CDH, price: PC A06/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 2 Aug 90
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP). Data from this notice letter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
The data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number. SETS was
created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
ority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS does not address the
range of other administrative duties related to tracking the
PRp. These lists (updated quarterly) represent EPA's prelimi-
nary findings on the identities of potentially responsible par-
ties. Inclusion on these lists does not constitute a final deter-
mination concerning the liability of any party for the hazard or
contamination at any CERCLA site. The site report is de-
signed to provide PRP information linked by the associated
site, which appears according to Washington where the site
is located.
Specifications: Also available in set of 3 reports PC E99/
MF E99, PB90-243452. See also PB90-243478. 119p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials,
Washington(State), Waste disposal, Coordinated procure-
ment, Directories, Site Enforcement Tracking System, Super-
fund, Remedial action.
0814 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
Listing by Site for Washington
Order Number PB91-131177CDH, price: PC A06/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 19 Dec 90
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP) for the state of Washington.
Data from this notice letter is used to form the Site Enforce-
ment Tracking System (SETS). This data includes PRP name
and address, a company contact person, the date the notice
was issued, and the related CERCLA site name and .dentifi-
cation number. SETS was created to track PRP identification
at both NPL (National Priority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS
does not address the range of other administrative duties re-
lated to tracking the PRP.
Specifications: Also available in set of 3 reports PC E99/
MF E99, PB91-131144. Supersedes PB91-243486. See also
PB91-131169. 120p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials,
Washington(State), Waste disposal, Coordinated procure-
ment Directories, Site Enforcement Tracking System, Super-
fund, Remedial action, Potentially responsible parties.
0815 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
Listing by Site for Washington
Order Number PB91-171041CDH, price: PC A07/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 5 Apr 91
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issued a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP). Data from this notice etter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
This data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number. SETS was
created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
ority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS does not address the
range of other administrative duties related to tracking the
PRP The site report is designed to provide PRP information
linked by the associated site, which appears according to the
state where the site is located.
Specifications: Also available in set of 3 reports PC E99/
MF E99, PB91-171017. Supersedes PB91-131177. See also
PB91-171033. 147p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste dis-
posal Superfund, Notification procedures, Directories,
Washington(State), Site Enforcement Tracking System, Po-
tentially responsible parties.
150
-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION:
0816 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)- PRP
Listing by Site for West Virginia
Order Number PB90-243031CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
WaV^n^n«LPrrtefCti°n Agency' Washington, DC. Office of
waste Programs Enforcement; 2 Aug 90
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Comore
nensive Environmental Response, Compensation
Il?±±' ,EPA ™st conduct a_ search to ic
waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
- , Staff issue a notice letter to the poten
esfonsib'e Party (PRP). Data from this notice letter is
to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System SETS?
The data includes PRP name and address a company con
he ^ thS n°tiCe WaS iSSUed' aSTe related
t ,nanme and identification number. SETS was
to track PRP identification at both NPL (National^
onty List) and non-NPL sites. SETS does not address the
°
TheSe,t e
. These lists (updated quarterly) represent EPA's orelimi
nary findings on the identities of potentially responsible S-"
tes. Inclusion on these lists does not constitute a final dete -
rn.nat.on concerning the liability of any party for the hazard or
contamination at any CERCLA site. Ths ?£ report ?s £
hchParnnde PRP in?rmati°n linked *V ^ associated
eated S according to West Vir9jnia where the site
r Also available in set of 5 reports PC E99/
9, PB90-242983. See also PB90-243023 14p
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, West Virgin-
Site EnL^fv Co°rdinated Procurement Directories,
action m9 SyStem' SuPerfund, Remedial
0817 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
Listing by Site for West Virginia
Order Number PB91-130682CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Srp^o™^0" A9enCy' Washington, DC. Office of
waste Programs Enforcement; 19 Dec 90
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA fComore
'ppr^1 ReSp°nSe' C°mpensatSn and TS-"
,A mUSt C°nduct a search to identify parties
h f"^anCial resP0nsib»ity for remediation of un-
M hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten
Da a fZTf S tPartV (PRP) f°r tne State of West vESSta.
Data from this notice letter is used to form the Site Enforce-
Tnd Jdf 9 SyStem (SETS)- This data i^ludes PRP name
was fssued flnHC?hmPa7 COntaCt person' the date ^ notice
was issued and the related CERCLA site name and identifi-
at boVSpLTNaStETS.WpaS CrSated t0 traCk PRP identiSon
NpL Nl Priority List) and non-NPL sites SETS
Also avai|able in set of 5 reports PC E99/
Supersedes PB90-243P031 See also
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, West Virgin-
Site En Ll'mPOStalV C°ordinated Procurement, Directories,
^
0818 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
Listing by Site for West Virginia
Order Number PB91-170597CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 5 Apr 91
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
w.th potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
S?T » hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issued a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP). Data from this notice letter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)
This data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
r^??0"' the date the notice was issued> and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number. SETS was
created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
ority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS does not address the
Daoie-ru °ther administrative duties related to tracking the
i-T'^I tu'te report is des'gned to provide PRP information
linked by the associated site, which appears according to the
state where the site is located.
?£e|!?Cations: Also ava'lable in set of 5 reports PC E99/
PRa^Tn^o1:170548- SuPersedes PB91-130682. See also
rnkn-1 /Uoo9. 15p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste dis-
posal, Superfund, Notification procedures, Directories West
Virginia Site Enforcement Tracking System, Potentially re-
sponsible parties.
0819 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
Listing by Site for Wisconsin
Order Number PB90-243197CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 2 Aug 90
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
1L ^t3 !•' ,EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
wllt M hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
lally responsible party (PRP). Data from this notice letter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)
The data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
^!L£??°n> the date the notice was issued- and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number. SETS was
created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
ority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS does not address the
DaDDe-ru °th,er administrative duties related to tracking the
PRP. These lists (updated quarterly) represent EPA's prelimi-
nary findings on the identities of potentially responsible par-
ties. Inclusion on these lists does not constitute a final deter-
mination concerning the liability of any party for the hazard or
contamination at any CERCLA site. The site report is de-
signed to provide PRP information linked by the associated
site, which appears according to Wisconsin where the site is
located.
..v ,_ s: Also available in set of 6 reports PC E99/
MF E99, PB90-243130. See also PB90-243189 44p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Wisconsin
Waste disposal, Coordinated procurement, Directories Site
Enforcement Tracking System, Superfund, Remedial action
151
-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Enforcement
0820 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
Listing by Site for Wisconsin
Order Number PB91-130831CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 19 Dec 90
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP) for the state of Wisconsin. Data
from this notice letter is used to form the Site Enforcement
Tracking System (SETS). This data includes PRP name and
address, a company contact person, the date the notice was
issued, and the related CERCLA site name and identification
number. SETS was created to track PRP identification at
both NPL (National Priority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS
does not address the range of other administrative duties re-
lated to tracking the PRP.
Specifications: Also available in set of 6 reports PC E99/
MF E99, PB91-130773. Supersedes PB90-243205. See also
PB91-130823. 54p.
Subject Index keywords: Hazardous materials, Wisconsin,
Waste disposal, Coordinated procurement, Directories, Site
Enforcement Tracking System, Superfund, Remedial action,
Potentially responsible parties.
0821 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
Listing by Site for Wisconsin
Order Number PB91-170753CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 5 Apr 91
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issued a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP). Data from this notice letter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
This data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number. SETS was
created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
ority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS does not address the
range of other administrative duties related to tracking the
PRP. Tna Site report is designed to provide PRP information
linked by the associated site, which appears according to the
state where the site is located.
Specifications: Also available in set of 6 reports PC E99/
MF E99, PB91-170696. Supersedes PB91-130831. See also
PB91-170746. 58p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste dis-
posal, Superfund, Notification procedures, Directories, Wis-
consin, Site Enforcement Tracking System, Potentially re-
sponsible parties.
0822 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
Listing by Site for Wyoming
Order Number PB90-243379CDH, price: PC A01 /MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 2 Aug 90
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter tc.the^poten-
tially responsible party (PRP). Data from this no ice letter s
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
The data includes PRP name and address a company con-
tact person, the date the notice was issued and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number SETS was
created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pn-
ority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS does not address he
range of other administrative duties related f ^ta"9 *f
PRP These lists (updated quarterly) represent EPAs prelimi-
nary findings on the identities of V*^*™**^^
ties Inclusion on these lists does not constitute a final deter-
mination concerning the liability of any party for the hazard or
examination at any CERCLA site The s,t e report is.de-
signed to provide PRP information linked by the associated
site, which appears according to Wyoming where the site is
located.
Specifications: Also available in set of 6 reports PC E99/
MF E99, PB90-243312. See also PB90-243361. 5p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste dis-
posal, Wyoming, Coordinated procurement Directories, Site
Enforcement Tracking System, Superfund, Remedial action.
0823 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
Listing by Site for Wyoming
Order Number PB91-131060CDH, price: PC A01/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 19 Dec 90
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP) for the state of Wyoming. Data
from this notice letter is used to form the Site•Entawrnert
Tracking System (SETS). This data includes PRP name and
aSess9 a company contact person, the date the no ice was
fssued, and the related CERCLA site name and identification
number. SETS was created to track PRP identi,cation at
both NPL (National Priority List) and non-NPL sites SETS
does not address the range of other administrative duties re-
lated to tracking the PRP.
Specifications: Also available in set of 6 reports PC E99/
MFE99, PB91-131003. Supersedes PB90-243379. See also
PB91-131052. 5p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Wyoming
Waste disposal, Coordinated procurement, Directories, Site
Enforcement Tracking System, Superfund, Remedial action,
Potentially responsible parties.
152
-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Enforcement
0824 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)- PRP
Listing by Site for Wyoming
Order Number PB91-170936CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 5 Apr 91
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issued a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP). Data from this notice letter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)
This data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
QERCLA site name and identification number. SETS was
created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
ority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS does not address the
range of other administrative duties related to tracking the
PRP. The site report is designed to provide PRP information
linked by the associated site, which appears according to the
state where the site is located.
Specifications: Also available in set of 6 reports PC E99/
MF E99, PB91-170878. Supersedes PB91-131060. See also
PB91-170928. 7p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste dis-
posal, Superfund, Notification procedures, Directories, Wyo-
ming, Site Enforcement Tracking System, Potentially respon-
sible parties.
0825 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
National Frequency by Party Name, January 22,1992
Order Number PB92-139518CDH, price: Call for price
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 22 Jan 92
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP). Data from the notice letter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)
The data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number. SETS was
created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
ority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS does not address the
range of other administrative duties related to tracking the
PRP.
Specifications: Supersedes PB92-105360. 4130p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste dis-
posal, Directories, Site Enforcement Tracking System, Poten-
tially responsible parties, Superfund.
0826 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
National Listing Alphabetically by Party Name
Order Number PB90-242850CDH, price: Call for price
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 2 Aug 90
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP). Data from this notice letter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
The data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number. SETS was
created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
ority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS does not address the
range of other administrative duties related to tracking the
PRP. These lists (updated quarterly) represent EPA's prelimi-
nary findings on the identities of potentially responsible par-
ties. Inclusion on these lists does not constitute a final deter-
mination concerning the liability of any party for the hazard or
contamination at any CERCLA site. The alpha report lists the
PRPs in alphabetical order and links the records with the
site(s) where potential liability is associated.
Specifications: 2395p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste dis-
posal, Industries, Coordinated procurement, Directories, Site
Enforcement Tracking System, Superfund, Remedial action.
0827 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
National Listing Alphabetically by Party Name
Order Number PB91-130492CDH, price: Call for price
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 19 Dec 90
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP). Data from this notice letter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
This data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number. SETS was
created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
ority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS does not address the
range of other administrative duties related to tracking the
PRP.
Specifications: Supersedes PB90-242850. 2565p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste dis-
posal, Coordinated procurement, Directories, Site Enforce-
ment Tracking System, Superfund, Remedial action, Poten-
tially responsible parties.
0828 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
National Listing Alphabetically by Party Name
Order Number PB91-170415CDH, price: Call for price
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 5 Apr 91
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issued a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP). Data from this notice letter is
used to -form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
This data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person, the date the notice was issued, and,the related
153
-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Enforcement
CERCLA site name and identification number. SETS was
created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
ority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS does" not address the
range of other administrative duties related to tracking the
PRP. The alpha report lists the PRPs in alphabetical order
and links the records with the site(s) where potential liability
is associated.
Specifications: Supersedes PB91-130492. 2753p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste dis-
posal, Superfund, Notification procedures, Directories, Site
Enforcement Tracking System.
0829 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
National Listing Alphabetically by Party Name
Order Number PB93-134187CDH, price: Call for price
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 8 Dec 92
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP). Data from this notice letter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
This data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number. SETS was
created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
ority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS does not address the
range of other administrative duties related to tracking the
PRP.
Specifications: Supersedes PB92-220136. 5887p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Remedial action,
Waste disposal, Directories, Hazardous materials, Site En-
forcement Tracking System, Potentially responsible parties.
0830 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
National Listing Alphabetically by Party Name
Order Number PB93-177129CDH, price: Call for price
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; Apr 93
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP). Data from the notice letter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
The data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number.
Specifications: Supersedes PB93-134187. SOOOp.
Subject index keywords: Law enforcement, Hazardous ma-
terials, Sites, Superfund, Waste management, Potential re-
sponsible party.
0831 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
National Listing Alphabetically by Party Name, January
22, 1992
Order Number PB92-139526CDH, price: PC A09
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 22 Jan 92
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP). Data from the notice letter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
The data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number. SETS was
created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
ority List) and non-NPL sites.
Specifications: Supersedes PB92-105345. 184p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste dis-
posal, Directories, Superfund, Potentially responsible parties,
USEPA regions 1-10.
0832 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
National Listing by Site
Order Number PB90-242843CDH, price: Call for price
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Water
and Land Div; 2 Aug 90
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP). Data from this notice letter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
The data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number. SETS was
created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
ority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS does not address the
range of other administrative duties related to tracking the
PRP. These lists (updated quarterly) represent EPA's prelimi-
nary findings on the identities of potentially responsible par-
ties. Inclusion on these lists does not constitute a final deter-
mination concerning the liability of any party for the hazard or
contamination at any CERCLA site. The site report is de-
signed to provide PRP information linked by the associated
site, which appears according to the state where the site is
located.
Specifications: 2290p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste dis-
posal, Coordinated procurement, Directories, Site Enforce-
ment Tracking System, Superfund, Remedial action.
0833 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
National Listing by Site
Order Number PB91-131334CDH, price: Call for price
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 19 Dec 90
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
154
-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Enforcement
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP). Data from this notice letter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)
This data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
r^L£?rf°n' the date the notice was issued- and the related
OERCLA site name and identification number. SETS was
created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
ority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS does not address the
Daoie-ru er administrative duties related to tracking the
PRP. These lists (updated quarterly) represent EPA's prelimi-
nary findings on the identities of potentially responsible par-
ties. Inclusion on these lists does not constitute a final deter-
mination concerning the liability of any party for the hazard or
contamination at any CERCLA site.
Specifications: Supersedes PB90-242843. 2446p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste dis-
posal, Coordinated procurement, Directories, Alabama Site
Enforcement Tracking System, Superfund, Potentially re-
sponsible parties, Remedial action.
0834 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
National Listing by Site
Order Number PB91 -170407CDH, price: Call for price
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 5 Apr 91
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issued a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP). Data from this notice letter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)
This data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
^LR?rf°n' the date tne notice was issued- and the related
OERCLA site name and identification number. SETS was
created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
ority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS does not address the
range of other administrative duties related to tracking the
r i -,I Slte report is des'gned to provide PRP information
linked by the associated site, which appears according to the
state where the site is located.
Specifications: Supersedes PB91-131334. 2620p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste dis-
posal, Superfund, Notification procedures, Directories Site
Enforcement Tracking System, Potentially responsible par-
ties.
0835 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
National Listing by Site
Order Number PB93-134195CDH, price: Call for price
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; Dec 92
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP). Data from this notice letter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)
This data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number. SETS was
created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
ority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS does not address the
range of other administrative duties related to trackinq the
PRP.
Specifications: Set includes PB93-134203 through PB93-
134294. Supersedes PB92-220128. 11542p-in 10v.
Subjeclt index keywords: Superfund, Remedial action,
Waste disposal, Directories, Hazardous materials, Site En-
forcement Tracking System, Potentially responsible parties.
0836 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
National Listing by Site
Order Number PB93-177137CDH, price: Call for price
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; Apr 93
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP). Data from the notice letter is
used to form the. Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
The data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number.
Specifications: Set includes PB93-177145 through PB93-
177236. Supersedes PB93-134195. 6767p-in 10v.
Subject index keywords: Law enforcement, Superfund,
Sites, Waste management, Potential responsible party.
0837 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
National Listing by Site, January 22, 1992
Order Number PB92-139500CDH, price: Call for price
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 22 Jan 92
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP). Data from the notice letter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
The data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number. SETS was
created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
ority List) and non-NPL sites.
Specifications: Supersedes PB92-105352. 3346p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste dis-
posal, Directories, Superfund, Potentially responsible parties
USEPA regions 1-10.
155
-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Enforcement
0838 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
Report by Site for Region 1, September 26,1991
Order Number PB92-105246CDH, price: PC A21
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 26 Sep 91
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP). Data from the notice letter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
The data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number. SETS was
created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
ority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS does not address the
range of other administrative duties related to tracking the
PRP. The site report is designed to provide PRP information
linked by the associated site, which appears according to the
state where the site is located. Region 1 includes Connecti-
cut, Massachusetts, Maine, New Hampshire, Rhode Island
and Vermont.
Specifications: Supersedes PB92-215194 through PB91-
215244 and PB91-215806. See also PB92-105337. 499p.
Subject Index keywords: Superfund, Waste disposal, Haz-
ardous materials, Directories, Site Enforcment Tracking
System, Potentially responsible parties, EPA region 1.
0839 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
Report by Site for Region 2, September 26, 1991
Order Number PB92-105253CDH, price: PC A09
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 26 Sep 91
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP). Data from the notice letter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
The data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number. SETS was
created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
ority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS does not address the
range of other administrative duties related to tracking the
PRP. The site report is designed to provide PRP information
linked by the associated site, which appears according to the
state where the site is located. Region 2 includes New
Jersey, New York, Puerto Rico, and Virgin Islands.
Specifications: Supersedes PB91-215251 through PB91-
215277 and PB91-170530. See also PB92-105246. 196p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste disposal, Haz-
ardous materials, Directories, Site Enforcement Tracking
System, Potentially responsible parties, EPA region 2.
i 'i<
0840 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
Report by Site for Region 3, September 26, 1991
Order Number PB92-105261CDH, price: PC A16
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 26 Sep 91
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP). Data from the notice letter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
The data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number. SETS was
created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
ority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS does not address the
range of other administrative duties related to tracking the
PRP. The site report is designed to provide PRP information
linked by the associated site, which appears according to the
state where the site is located. Region 3 includes Delaware,
District of Columbia*, Maryland, Pennsylvania, Virginia, and
West Virginia.
Specifications: Supersedes PB91-215285 through PB91-
215335. See also PB92-105253. 357p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste disposal, Haz-
ardous materials, Directories, Site Enforcement Tracking
System, Potentially responsible parties, EPA region 3.
0841 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
Report by Site for Region 4, September 26, 1991
Order Number PB92-105279CDH, price: PC A11
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 26 Sep 91
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP). Data from the notice letter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
The data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number. SETS was
created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
ority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS does not address the
range of other administrative duties related to tracking the
PRP. The site report is designed to provide PRP information
linked by the associated site, which appears according to the
state where the site is located. Region 4 includes Alabama,
Florida, Georgia, Kentucky, Mississippi, North Carolina, South
Carolina, and Tennessee.
Specifications: Supersedes PB91-215343 through PB91-
215426. See also PB92-105261. 248p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste disposal, Haz-
ardous materials, Directories, Site Enforcement Tracking
System, Potentially responsible parties, EPA region 4.
156
-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Enforcement
0842 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
Report by Site for Region 5, September 26, 1991
Order Number PB92-105287CDH, price: Call for price
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 26 Sep 91
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP). Data from the notice letter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)
The data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number. SETS was
created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
ority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS does not address the
range of other administrative duties related to tracking the
PRP. The site report is designed to provide PRP information
linked by the associated site, which appears according to the
state where the site is located. Region 5 includes Illinois, In-
diana, Michigan, Minnesota, Ohio, and Wisconsin.
Specifications: Supersedes PB91-215434 through PB91-
215491. See also PB92-105279. 639p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste disposal, Haz-
ardous materials, Directories, Site Enforcement Tracking
System, Potentially responsible parties, EPA region 5.
0843 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
Report by Site for Region 6, September 26, 1991
Order Number PB92-105295CDH, price: PC A12
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 26 Sep 91
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP). Data from the notice letter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
The data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number. SETS was
created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
ority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS does not address the
range of other administrative duties related to tracking the
PRP. The site report is designed to provide PRP information
linked by the associated site, which appears according to the
state where the site is located. Region 6 includes Arkansas,
Louisiana, New Mexico, Oklahoma, and Texas.
Specifications: Supersedes PB91-215509 through PB91-
215558. See also PB92-105287. 270p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste disposal, Haz-
ardous materials, Directories, Site Enforcement Tracking
System, Potentially responsible parties, EPA region 6.
0844 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
Report by Site for Region 7, September 26, 1991
Order Number PB92-105303CDH, price: PC A12
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 26 Sep 91
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP). Data from the notice letter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
The data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number. SETS was
created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
ority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS does not address the
range of other administrative duties related to tracking the
PRP. The site report is designed to provide PRP information
linked by the associated site, which appears according to the
state where the site is located. Region 7 includes Iowa,
Kansas, Missouri, and Nebraska.
Specifications: Supersedes PB91-215566 through PB91-
215608. See also PB92-105295. 261 p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste disposal, Haz-
ardous materials, Directories, Site Enforcement Tracking
System, Potentially responsible parites, EPA region 7.
0845 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
Report by Site for Region 8, September 26, 1991
Order Number PB92-105311CDH, price: PC A06
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 26 Sep 91
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP). Data from the notice letter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
The data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number.
Specifications: Supersedes PB91-215616 through PB91-
215673. See also PB92-105303. 112p.
Subject index keywords: Sites, Hazardous materials.
0846 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
Report by Site for Region 9, September 26, 1991
Order Number PB92-105329CDH, price: PC A12
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 26 Sep 91
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP). Data from the notice letter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
The data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
157
-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Enforcement
tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number. SETS was
created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
ority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS does not address the
range of other administrative duties related to tracking the
PRP. The site report is designed to provide PRP information
linked by the associated site, which appears according to the
state where the site is located. Region 9 includes American
Samoa, Arizona, California, Guam, Hawaii, Midway, Nevada,
Northern Marianas, Pacific Islands*, Trust Territories, and
Wake Island.
Specifications: Supersedes PB91-215681 through PB91-
215749. See also PB92-105311. 269p.
Subject Index keywords: Superfund, Waste disposal, Haz-
ardous materials, Directories, Site Enforcement Tracking
System, Potentially responsible parties, EPA region 9.
0847 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
Report by Site for Region 10, September 26, 1991
Order Number PB92-105337CDH, price: PC A09
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 26 Sep 91
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP). Data from the notice letter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
The data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number. SETS was
created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
ority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS does not address the
range of other administrative duties related to tracking the
PRP. The site report is designed to provide PRP information
linked by the associated site, which appears according to the
state where the site is located. Region 10 includes Alaska*,
Idaho, Oregon, and Washington.
Specifications: Supersedes PB91-215756 and PB91-
215772 through PB91-215798. See also PB92-105329. 180p.
Subject Index keywords: Superfund, Waste disposal, Haz-
ardous materials, Directories, Site Enforcement Tracking
System, Potentially responsible parties, EPA region 10. ,
0848 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP Site
Listing by Site for Virginia
Order Number PB90-243023CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 2 Aug 90
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP). Data from this notice letter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
The data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number. SETS was
created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
ority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS does not address the
range of other administrative duties related to tracking the
PRP. These lists (updated quarterly) represent EPA's prelimi-
nary findings on the identities of potentially responsible par-
ties. Inclusion on these lists does not constitute a final deter-
mination concerning the liability of any party for the hazard or
contamination at any CERCLA site. The site report is de-
signed to provide PRP information linked by the assocjated
site, which appears according to Virginia where the site is lo-
cated.
, Specifications: Also available in set of 5 reports PC E99/
MF E99, PB90-242983. See also PB90-243015 and PB90-
243031. 24p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Virginia,
Waste disposal, Coordinated procurement, Directories, Site
Enforcement Tracking System, Superfund, Remedial action.
0849 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS) (Region 1
- 3 1/2 Inch Diskette IBM PS/2 Compatible) (for
Microcomputers)
Order Number PB92-500131CDH, price: D01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; Oct 91
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP). Data from the notice letter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
The data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number. SETS was
created by EPA to track PRP identification at both NPL (Na-
tional Priority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS does not ad-
dress the range of other .administrative duties related to
tracking the PRP. These lists (updated quarterly) represent
EPA's preliminary findings on the identities of PRPs. Inclu-
sion on these lists does not constitute a final determination
concerning the liability of any party for the hazard or con-
tamination at any CERCLA site. Region 1 includes Connecti-
cut, Maine, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, Rhode Island,
and Vermont.
, Specifications: The datafile is on one, 3 1/2 inch diskette,
1.44M high density. File format ASCII. System: IBM PS/2;
MS DOS 3.3 operating system, 640K. Other formats avail-
able as IBM (or compatible) 5 1/4 inch - PB90-502618. 1 dis-
kette.
Subject index keywords: Data file, Hazardous materials,
Waste disposal, Superfund, Remedial action, Directories, Site
Enforcement Tracking System, Potentially responsible par-
ties, EPA region 1.
0850 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS) (Region
1) (for Microcomputers)
Order Number PB90-502618CDH, price: D01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; Aug 90
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
158
-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Enforcement
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP). Data from this notice letter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
This data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number. SETS was
created by EPA to track PRP identification at both NPL (Na-
tional Priority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS does not ad-
dress the range of other administrative duties related to
tracking the PRP. These lists represent EPA's preliminary
findings on the identities of PRPs. Inclusion on these lists
does not constitute a final determination concerning the li-
ability of any party for the hazard or contamination at any
CERCLA site. Region 1 includes Connecticut, Maine, Massa-
chusetts, New Hampshire, Rhode Island, and Vermont.
Specifications: The datafile is contained on two 1.2M, 51/4
inch diskettes, high density. File format: ASCII. System: IBM
PC/AT; MS DOS 3.3 operating system, 640K. 2 diskettes.
Subject index keywords: Data file, Hazardous materials,
Superfund, Remedial action, Region 1, Waste management.
0851 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS) (Region 2
- 3 1/2 Inch Diskette IBM PS/2 Compatible) (for
Microcomputers)
Order Number PB92-500149CDH, price: D01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; Oct 91
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP). Data from the notice letter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
The data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number. SETS was
created by EPA to track PRP identification at both NPL (Na-
tional Priority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS does not ad-
dress the range of other administrative duties related to
tracking the PRP. These lists (updated quarterly) represent
EPA's preliminary findings on the identities of PRPs. Inclu-
sion on these lists does not constitute a final determination
concerning the liability of any party for the hazard or con-
tamination at any CERCLA site. Region 2 includes New
Jersey, New York, Puerto Rico, and Virgin Islands*. There
are no sites in this territory at this time.
Specifications: The datafile is on one, 3 1 /2 inch diskette,
1.44M high density. File format: ASCII. System: IBM PS/2;
MS DOS 3.3 operating system, 640K. Other formats avail-
able as IBM (or compatible) 5 1/4 inch - PB90-502626. 1 dis-
kette.
Subject index keywords: Data file, Hazardous materials,
Waste disposal, Superfund, Remedial action, Directories, Site
Enforcement Tracking System, Potentially responsible par-
ties, EPA region 2.
0852 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS) (Region
2) (for Microcomputers)
Order Number PB90-502626CDH, price: D01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; Aug 90
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP). Data from this notice letter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
This data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number. SETS was
created by EPA to track PRP identification at both NPL (Na-
tional Priority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS does not ad-
dress the range of other administrative duties related to
tracking the PRP. These lists represent EPA's preliminary
findings on the identities of PRPs. Inclusion on these lists
does not constitute a final determination concerning the li-
ability of any party for the hazard or contamination at any
CERCLA site. Region 2 includes New Jersey, New York,
Puerto Rico, and the Virgin Islands.
Specifications: The datafile is contained on one 1.2M, 5 1/4
inch diskette, high density. File format: ASCII. System: IBM
PC/AT; MS DOS 3.3 operating system, 640K. 1 diskette.
Subject index keywords: Data .file, Hazardous materials,
Superfund, Remedial action, Region 2, Waste management.
0853 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS) (Region 3
- 3 1/2 Inch Diskette IBM PS/2 Compatible) (for
Microcomputers)
Order Number PB92-500156CDH, price: D01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; Oct 91
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP). Data from the notice letter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
The data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number. SETS was
created by EPA to track PRP identification at both NPL (Na-
tional Priority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS does not ad-
dress the range of other administrative duties related to
tracking the PRP. These lists (updated quarterly) represent
EPA's preliminary findings on the identities of PRPs. Inclu-
sion on these lists does not constitute a final determination
concerning the liability of any party for the hazard or con-
tamination at any CERCLA site. Region 3 includes Delaware,
District of Columbia*, Maryland, Pennsylvania, Virginia and
West Virginia. *There are no sites in this federal district at
this time.
Specifications: The datafile is on one, 3 1/2 inch diskette,
1.44M high density. File format: ASCII. System: IBM PS/2;
MS DOS 3.3 operating system, 640K. Other formats avail-
159
-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Enforcement
able as IBM (or compatible) 51/4 inch - PB90-502634. 1 dis-
kette.
Subject Index keywords: Data file, Hazardous materials,
Waste disposal, Superfund, Remedial action, Directories, Site
Enforcement Tracking System, Potentially responsible par-
ties. EPA region 3.
0854 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS) (Region
3) (for Microcomputers)
Order Number PB90-502634CDH, price: D01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; Aug 90
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff Issue a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP). Data from this notice letter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
This data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number. SETS was
created by EPA to track PRP identification at both NPL (Na-
tional Priority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS does not ad-
dress the range of other administrative duties related to
tracking the PRP. These lists represent EPA's preliminary
findings on the identities of PRPs. Inclusion on these lists
does not constitute a final determination concerning the li-
ability of any party for the hazard or contamination at any
CERCLA site. Region 3 includes Delaware, District of Colum-
bia, Maryland, Pennsylvania, Virginia, and West Virginia.
Specifications: The datafile is contained on one 1.2M, 51/4
inch diskette, high density. File format: ASCII. System: IBM
PC/AT; MS DOS 3.3 operating system, 640K. 1 diskette.
Subject Index keywords: Data file, Hazardous materials,
Superfund, Remedial action, Region 3, Waste management.
0855 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS) (Region 4
- 3 1/2 Inch Diskette IBM PS/2 Compatible) (for
Microcomputers)
Order Number PB92:500164CDH, price: D01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; Oct 91
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP). Data from the notice letter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
The data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number. SETS was
created by EPA to track PRP identification at both NPL (Na-
tional Priority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS does not ad-
dress the range of other administrative duties related to
tracking the PRP. These lists (updated quarterly) represent
EPA's preliminary findings on the identities of PRPs. Inclu-
sion on these lists does not constitute a final determination
concerning the liability of any party for the hazard or con-
tamination at any CERCLA site. Region 4 includes Alabama,
Florida, Georgia, Kentucky, Mississippi, North Carolina, South
Carolina, and Tennessee.
Specifications: The datafile is on one, 3 1/2 inch diskette,
1.44M high density. File format: ASCII. System: IBM PS/2;
MS DOS 3.3 operating system, 640K. Other formats avail-
able as IBM (or compatible) 5 1/4 inch - PB90-502642. 1 dis-
kette.
Subject index keywords: Data file, Hazardous materials,
Waste disposal, Superfund, Remedial action, Directories, Site
Enforcement Tracking System, Potentially responsible par-
ties, EPA region 4.
0856 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS) (Region
4) (for Microcomputers)
Order Number PB90-502642CDH, price: D01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; Aug 90
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP). Data from this notice letter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
This data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number. SETS was
created by EPA to track PRP identification at both NPL (Na-
tional Priority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS does not ad-
dress the range of other administrative duties related to
tracking the PRP. These lists represent EPA's preliminary
findings on the identities of PRPs. Inclusion on these lists
does not constitute a final determination concerning the li-
ability of any party for the hazard or contamination at any
CERCLA site. Region 4 includes Alabama, Florida, Georgia,
Kentucky, Mississippi, North Carolina, South Carolina, and
Tennessee.
Specifications: The datafile is contained on one 1.2M, 5 1 /4
inch diskette, high density. File format: ASCII. System: IBM
PC/AT; MS DOS 3.3 operating system, 640K. 1 diskette.
Subject index keywords: Data file, Hazardous materials,
Superfund, Region 4, Remedial action, Waste management.
0857 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS) (Region 5
- 3 1/2 Inch Diskette IBM PS/2 Compatible) (for
Microcomputers)
Order Number PB92-500172CDH, price: D01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; Oct 91
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP). Data from the notice letter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
The data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number. SETS was
created by EPA to track PRP identification at both NPL (Na-
tional Priority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS does not ad-
160
-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Enforcement
dress the range of other administrative duties related to
tracking the PR P. These lists (updated quarterly) represent
EPA's preliminary findings on the identities of PRPs. Inclu-
sion on these lists does not constitute a final determination
concerning the liability of any party for the hazard or con-
tamination at any CERCLA site. Region 5 includes Illinois, In-
diana, Michigan, Minnesota, Ohio, and Wisconsin.
Specifications: The datafile is on one, 3 1/2 inch diskette,
1.44M high density. File format: ASCII. System: IBM PS/2;
MS DOS 3.3 operating system, 640K. Other formats avail-
able as IBM (or compatible) 5 1/4 inch - PB90-502659. 1 dis-
kette.
Subject index keywords: Data file, Hazardous materials,
Waste disposal, Superfund, Remedial action, Directories, Site
Enforcement Tracking System, Potentially responsible par-
ties, EPA region 5.
0858 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS) (Region
5) (for Microcomputers)
Order Number PB90-502659CDH, price: D01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; Aug 90
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP). Data from this notice letter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
This data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number. SETS was
created by EPA to track PRP identification at both NPL (Na-
tional Priority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS does not ad-
dress the range of other administrative duties related to
tracking the PRP. These lists represent EPA's preliminary
findings on the identities of PRPs. Inclusion on these lists
does not constitute a final determination concerning the li-
ability of any party for the hazard or contamination at any
CERCLA site. Region 5 includes Illinois, Indiana, Michigan,
Minnesota, Ohio, and Wisconsin.
Specifications: The datafile is contained on two 1.2M, 5 1/4
inch diskettes, high density. File format: ASCII. System: IBM
PC/AT; MS DOS 3.3 operating system, 640 K. 2 diskettes.
Subject index keywords: Data file, Hazardous materials,
Superfund, Region 5, Remedial action, Waste management.
0859 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS) (Region 6
- 3 1/2 Inch Diskette IBM PS/2 Compatible) (for
Microcomputers)
Order Number PB92-500180CDH, price: D01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; Oct 91
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP). Data from the notice letter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
The data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number. SETS was
created by EPA to track PRP identification at both NPL (Na-
tional Priority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS does not ad-
dress the range of other administrative duties related to
tracking the PRP. these lists (updated quarterly) represent
EPA's preliminary findings on the identities of PRPs. Inclu-
sion on these lists does not constitute a final determination
concerning the liability of any party for the hazard or con-
tamination at any CERCLA site. Region 6 includes Arkansas,
Louisiana, New Mexico, Oklahoma, and Texas.
Specifications: The datafile is on one, 3 1/2 inch diskette,
1.44M high density. File format: ASCII. System: IBM PS/2;
MS DOS 3.3 operating system, 640K. Other formats avail-
able as IBM (or compatible) 51/4 inch - PB90-502667. 1 dis-
kette.
Subject index keywords: Data file, Hazardous materials,
Waste disposal, Superfund, Remedial action, Directories, Site
Enforcement Tracking System, Potentially responsible par-
ties, EPA region 6.
0860 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS) (Region
6) (for Microcomputers)
Order Number PB90-502667CDH, price: D01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; Aug 90
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP). Data from this notice letter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
This data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number. SETS was
created by EPA to track PRP identification at both NPL (Na-
tional Priority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS does not ad-
dress the range of other administrative duties related to
tracking the PRP. These lists represent EPA's preliminary
findings on the identities of PRPs. Inclusion on these lists
does not constitute a final determination concerning the li-
ability of any party for the hazard or contamination at any
CERCLA site. Region 6 includes Arkansas, Louisiana, New
Mexico, Oklahoma, and Texas.
Specifications: The datafile is contained on one 1.2M, 5 1 /4
inch diskette, high density. File format: ASCII. System: IBM
PC/AT; MS DOS 3.3 operating system, 640K. 1 diskette.
Subject index keywords: Data file, Hazardous materials,
Superfund, Remedial action, Waste management, Region 6.
0861 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS) (Region 7
- 3 1/2 Inch Diskette IBM PS/2 Compatible) (for
Microcomputers)
Order Number PB92-500198CDH, price: D01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; Oct 91
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
161
-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Enforcement
tlally responsible party (PRP). Data from this notice letter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
This data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number. SETS was
created by EPA to track PRP identification at both NPL (Na-
tional Priority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS does not ad-
dress the range of other administrative duties related to
tracking the PRP. These lists (updated quarterly) represent
EPA's preliminary findings on the identities of PRPs. Inclu-
sion on these lists does not constitute a final determination
concerning the liability of any party for the hazard or con-
tamination at any CERCLA site. Region 7 includes Iowa,
Kansas, Missouri, and Nebraska.
Specifications: The datafile is on one, 31/2 inch diskette,
1.44M high density. File format: ASCII. System: IBM PS/2;
MS D0S 3.3 operating system, 640K. Other formats avail-
able as IBM (or compatible) 5 1/4 inch - PB90-502675. 1 dis-
kette.
Subject Index keywords: Data file, Hazardous materials,
Waste disposal, Superfund, Remedial action, Directories, Site
Enforcement Tracking System, Potentially responsible par-
ties, EPA region 7.
0862 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS) (Region
7) (for Microcomputers)
Order Number PB90-502675CDH, price: D01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 31 Jul 90
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP). Data from this notice letter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
This data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number. SETS was
created by EPA to track PRP identification at both NPL (Na-
tional Priority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS does not ad-
dress the range of other administrative duties related to
tracking the PRP. These lists represent EPA's preliminary
findings on the identities of PRPs. Inclusion on these lists
does not constitute a final determination concerning the li-
ability of any party for the hazard or contamination at any
CERCLA site. Region 7 includes Iowa, Kansas, Missouri, and
Nebraska.
Specifications: The datafile is contained on one 1.2M, 51/4
inch diskette, high density. File format: ASCII. System: IBM
PC/AT; MS DOS 3.3 operating system, 640K. 1 diskette.
Subject index keywords: Data file, Hazardous materials,
Superfund, Remedial action, Waste management, Region 7.
0863 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS) (Region 8
- 3 1/2 Inch Diskette IBM PS/2 Compatible) (for
Microcomputers)
Order Number PB92-500206CDH, price: D01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; Oct 91
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP). Data from this notice letter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
The data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number. SETS was
created by EPA to track PRP identification at both NPL (Na-
tional Priority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS does not ad-
dress the range of other administrative duties related to
tracking the PRP. These lists (updated quarterly) represent
EPA's preliminary findings on the identities of PRPs. Inclu-
sion on these lists does not constitute a final determination
concerning the liability of any party for the hazard or con-
tamination at any CERCLA site. Region 8 includes Colorado,
Montana, North Dakota, South Dakota, Utah, and Wyoming.
Specifications: The datafile is on one, 31/2 inch diskette,
1.44M high density. File format: ASCII. System: IBM PS/2;
MS DOS 3.3 operating system, 640K. Other formats avail-
able as IBM (or compatible) 5 1/4 inch - PB90-502683. 1 dis-
kette.
Subject index keywords: Data file, Hazardous materials,
Waste disposal, Superfund, Remedial action, Directories, Site
Enforcement Tracking System, Potentially responsible par-
ties, EPA region 8.
0864 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS) (Region
8) (for Microcomputers)
Order Number PB90-502683CDH, price: D01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 31 Jul 90
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP). Data from this notice letter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
This data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number. SETS was
created by EPA to track PRP identification at both NPL (Na-
tional Priority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS does not ad-
dress the range of other administrative duties related to
tracking the PRP. These lists represent EPA's preliminary
findings on the identities of PRPs. Inclusion on these lists
does not constitute a final determination concerning the li-
ability of any party for the hazard or contamination at any
CERCLA site. Region 8 includes Colorado, Montana, North
Dakota, South Dakota, Utah, and Wyoming.
Specifications: The datafile is contained on one 1.2M, 5 1/4
inch diskette, high density. File format: ASCII. System: IBM
PC/AT; MS DOS 3.3 operating system, 640K. 1 diskette.
Subject index keywords: Data file, Hazardous materials,
Superfund, Region 8, Waste management, Remedial action.
162
-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Enforcement
0865 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS) (Region 9
- 3 1/2 Inch Diskette IBM PS/2 Compatible) (for
Microcomputers)
Order Number PB92-500214CDH, price: D01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; Oct 91
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP). Data from this notice letter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
The data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person, the data the notice was issued, and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number. SETS was
created by EPA to track PRP identification at both NPL (Na-
tional Priority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS does not ad-
dress the range of other administrative duties related to
tracking the PRP. These lists (updated quarterly) represent
EPA's preliminary findings on the identities of PRPs. Inclu-
sion on these lists does not constitute a final determination
concerning the liability of any party for the hazard or con-
tamination at any CERCLA site. Region 9 includes-American
Somoa, Arizona, California, Guam*, Hawaii*, Midway*,
Nevada, Northern Marianas, Pacific Islands*, Trust Territo-
ries, and Wake Island*. *There are no sites in the state/terri-
tory at this time.
Specifications: The datafile is on one, 3 1/2 inch diskette,
1.44M high density. .File format: ASCII. System: IBM PS/2;
MS DOS 3.3 operating system, 640K. Other formats avail-
able as IBM (or compatible) 5 1/4 inch - PB90-502691 1 dis-
kette.
Subject index keywords: Data file, Hazardous materials,
Waste disposal, Superfund, Remedial action, Directories, Site
Enforcement Tracking System, Potentially responsible par-
ties, EPA region 9.
0866 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS) (Region
9) (for Microcomputers)
Order Number PB90-502691CDH, price: D01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; Aug 90
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP). Data from this notice letter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
This data includes PRP name and address, a. company con-
tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number. SETS was
created by EPA to track PRP identification at both NPL (Na-
tional Priority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS does riot ad-
dress the range of other administrative duties related ,to
tracking the PRP. These lists represent EPA's preliminary
findings on the identities of PRPs. Inclusion on these lists
does not constitute a final determination concerning the li-
ability of any party for the hazard or contamination at any
CERCLA site. Region 9 includes American Somoa, Arizona,
California, Guam, Hawaii, Midway, Nevada, Northern Mari-
anas, Pacific Islands, Trust Territories, and Wake Island.
Specifications: The datafile is contained on one 1.2M, 5 1/4
inch diskette, high density. File format: ASCII. System: IBM
PC/AT; MS DOS 3.3 operating system, 640K. 1 diskette.
Subject index keywords: Data file, Hazardous materials,
Superfund, Remedial action, Region 9, Waste management.
0867 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS) (Region
10-31/2 Inch Diskette IBM PS/2 Compatible) (for
' Microcomputers)
Order Number PB92-500222CDH, price: D01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; Oct 91
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP). Data from the notice letter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
The data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number. SETS was
created by EPA to track PRP identification at both NPL (Na-
tional Priority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS does not ad-
dress the range of other administrative duties related to
tracking the PRP. These lists (updated quarterly) represent
EPA's preliminary findings on the identities of PRPs. Inclu-
sion on these lists does not constitute a final determination
concerning the liability of any party for the hazard or con-
tamination at any CERCLA site. Region 10 includes Alaska*,
Idaho, Oregon, and Washington. *There are no sites in this
state at this time.
Specifications: The datafile is on one, 3 1/2 inch diskette,
1-.44M high density. File format: ASCII. System: IBM PS/2;
MS DOS 3.3 operating system, 640K. Other formats avail-
able as IBM (or compatible) 5 1 /4 inch - PB90-502709. 1 dis-
kette.
Subject index keywords: Data file, Hazardous materials,
Waste disposal, Superfund, Remedial action, Directories, Site
Enforcement Tracking System, Potentially responsible par-
ties, EPA region 10.
0868 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS) (Region
10) (for Microcomputers)
Order Number PB90-502709CDH, price: D01
'. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 31 Jul 90
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP). Data from this notice letter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
This data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number. SETS was
created by EPA to track PRP identification at both NPL (Na-
tional Priority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS does not ad-
163
-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Enforcement
dress the range of other administrative duties related to
tracking the PRP. These lists represent EPA's preliminary
findings on the identities of PRPs. Inclusion on these lists
does not constitute a final determination concerning the li-
ability of any party for the hazard or contamination at any
CERCLA site. Region 10 includes Alaska, Idaho, Oregon,
and Washington.
Specifications: The datafile is contained on one 1 .2M, 5 1 /4
inch diskette, high density. File format: ASCII. System: IBM
PC/AT; MS DOS 3.3 operating system, 640K. 1 diskette.
Subject index keywords: Data file, Hazardous materials,
Superfund, Waste management, Region 10, Remedial action.
0869 Small Cost Recovery Referrals
Order Number PB91-139006CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 12 Jul 85
The directive clarifies EPA policy on referring CERCLA cost
recovery cases valued at less than $200,000. There are two
memoranda attached, the first of which is entitled 'Prepara-
tion of Hazardous Waste Referrals,' dated July 30, 1985. The
memorandum provides guidance on preparing referral pack-
ages meeting Department of Justice requirements. The
second memorandum, entitled 'Small Cost Recovery Refer-
rals,' dated July 12, 1985, states that although the Agency
places nigh priority on larger cases, there are situations in
which cost recovery of small cases is appropriate.
Specifications: 10p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
Hazardous materials, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
Response.
0870 Streamlined Approach for Settlements with De
Minimis Waste Contributors under CERCLA Section
Order Number PB93-963617CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 30 Jul 93
The guidance sets forth the Agency's new approach to com-
pleting de minimis settlements. The memorandum expands
upon the information provided in the 'Superfund Administra-
tive Improvements - Final Report (June 23, 1993)'. Under
Section 122(g) of CERCLA the Agency may settle with per-
sons who contributed to a facility hazardous substances
which are minimal, both in terms of volume and toxicity or
other hazardous effects, relative to other hazardous sub-
stances at a site. De minimis settlements may only address a
minor amount of response costs at a site.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $225 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $450). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. See also PB92-963607. 10p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Hazardous materials,
Waste disposal, Liabilities.
0871 Submittal of Ten-Point Settlement Analyses for
CERCLA Consent Decrees
Order Number PB91-139485CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 11 Aug 89
The directive memorandum provides guidance to help ensure
the adequacy of information provided in the 'ten-point' analy-
ses of proposed CERCLA settlements.
Specifications: Portions of this document are not fully legi-
ble. 33p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
Hazardous materials, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
Response.
0872 Summary of 'Guidance of Landowner Liability under
Section 107(a)1 of CERCLA, De Minimis Settlements
under Section 122(g)(1)(b) of CERCLA, and Settlements
with Prospective Purchasers of Contaminated Property'
Order Number PB91-228288CDH, price: PC A01/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; May 91
The Fact Sheet summarizes when landowners may be eligi-
ble for a release from liability and when a landowner may be
eligible for a de minimis settlement. It also describes the
agency's policy on prospective purchasers of contaminated
property.
Specifications: 4p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
Hazardous materials, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
Response.
0873 Summary of 'Guidance on CERCLA Section 106(a)
UAOs for RD/RA'
Order Number PB91-228312CDH, price: PC A01/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; May 91
The Fact Sheet summarizes the procedures for issuing uni-
lateral orders and includes statutory requirements of section
106 orders, possible recipients of orders, case-specific con-
siderations, procedures for issuing unilateral orders, and
what to do in the case of non-compliance with an order.
Specifications: 4p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
Hazardous materials, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
Response.
0874 Summary of 'Guidance on Documenting Decisions
Not to Take Cost Recovery Actions'
Order Number PB91-228338CDH, price: PC A01/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; May 91
The Fact Sheet summarizes procedures for documenting a
decision not to pursue cost recovery actions.
Specifications: 3p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
Hazardous materials, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
Response.
0875 Summary of Interim Guidance: Streamlining the
CERCLA Settlement Decision Process'
Order Number PB91-228270CDH, price: PC A01/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; May 91
The Fact Sheet summarizes the three areas in which
changes will help improve and streamline the process for
conducting settlement discussions. The three areas are ne-
gotiation preparation, review of settlement decisions, and
deadline management.
Specifications: 4p.
164
-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Enforcement
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management
Hazardous materials, Office of Solid Waste and Emerqencv
Response.
0876 Summary of 'Interim Guidelines for Preparinq
NBARs'
Order Number PB91-228304CDH, price: PC A01/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; May 91
The Fact Sheet summarizes the procedures for preparing
NBARs, including when to use NBARs, how to prepare them
and offers bases on NBARs.
Specifications: 4p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
Hazardous materials, Office of Solid Waste and Emerqencv
Response.
0877 Summary of 'Interim Policy on CERCLA Settlements
Involving Municipalities and Municipal Wastes'
Order Number PB91-228262CDH, price: PC A01/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; May 91
The Fact Sheet addresses a consistent agency-wide ap-
proach for addressing municipalities and municipal wastes in
the Superfund settlement process. The policy also addresses
settlements with private generators and transporters of haz-
ardous waste trash derived from a commercial, institutional
or industrial process or activity.
Specifications: 4p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
Hazardous materials, Office of Solid Waste and Emerqencv
Response.
0878 Summary of 'Methodologies for Implementation of
CERCLA Section 122(g)(1)(a) De Minimis Waste
Contributor Settlements'
Order Number PB91-227959CDH, price: PC A01/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; May 91
The Fact Sheet summarizes the basic steps in forming set-
tlements with PRPs at a site who are minimal contributors to
the waste in comparison with other PRPs. It lists the criteria
for eligibility, communication procedures, timing costs, premi-
ums, reopeners, and settlement options.
Specifications: 4p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
Hazardous materials, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
Response.
0879 Summary of 'PRP Search Supplemental Guidance
for Sites in the Superfund Remedial Program'
Order Number PB91-228320CDH, price: PC A01/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; May 91
The Fact Sheet summarizes the steps involved in a thorough
PRP Search, including determination of liability, PRP Search
Planning, the PRP Search Process and compilinq PRP
Search Reports.
Specifications: 4p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management
Hazardous materials, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
Response.
0880 Summary of 'Releasing Information to Potentially
Responsible Parties at CERCLA Sites'
Order Number PB91-228296CDH, price: PC A01/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; May 91
The Fact Sheet summarizes EPA's policy on releasing infor-
mation to PRP's.
Specifications: 3p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
Hazardous materials, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
Response.
0881 Superfund and Small Waste Contributors
Order Number PB94-96361OCDH, price: PC A01/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Aug 93
When Congress enacted Superfund, it intended to make the
polluters pay for the costs of cleaning up these sites. To
achieve this goal, EPA seeks to hold those parties who con-
tributed to the contamination responsible for the cost of
cleanup. Such parties may be asked to help pay for the
cleanup of a site even if they acted in full accordance with
the law at the time they disposed of the waste. Superfund
encourages EPA to settle with these responsible parties out-
side of court, but also authorizes the Agency to bring actions
in court to require responsible parties to pay for (or perform)
the cleanup.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 2p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste dis-
posal, Cleanup, Superfund, Potentially responsible parties.
0882 Superfund Cost Recovery Strategy
Order Number PB91-139063CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; 29 Jul 88
The Superfund cost recovery strategy provides a framework
for planning and initiating actions to recover Federal funds
expended in CERCLA response actions. The directive dis-
cusses general cost recovery program priorities and provides
guidelines for setting case priorities for the most efficient use
of cost recovery resources.
Specifications: 55p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
Hazardous materials, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
Response.
0883 Superfund Enforcement Strategy and
Implementation Plan
Order Number PB91-138842CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
. Emergency and Remedial Response; 12 Apr 90
The directive reflects a review of recent studies of the Super-
fund program, as well as on going management initiatives in-
volving EPA and the Department of Justice, including the Su-
perfund Settlement Incentives and Disincentives Workgroup
and the Superfund Enforcement Management Issues Work-
group. A list of issues raised in various studies and reports is
included as Appendix B.
Specifications: 67p..
165
-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Enforcement
Subject Index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
Hazardous materials, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
Response.
0884 Superfund Information Repositories and
Administrative Records
Order Number PB92-963622CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; Aug 92
The fact sheet discusses two features of EPA's Superfund
Community Relations Program: the information repository
and the administrative record. The fact sheet describes the
types of information usually contained in the information re-
pository and administrative record and describes how the
public can access that information.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 9p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Hazardous materials,
Waste management, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
Response.
0885 Supplemental Guidance on Federal Superfund Liens
Order Number PB93-963618CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; 29 Jul 93
The purpose of the guidance document is to supplement the
'Guidance on Federal Superfund Liens' (PB91 -139055)
issued on September 22, 1987. The Supplement is in addi-
tion to, and does not supersede the 1987 document, which
provided criteria for the decision to file liens under Section
107 (1) of the Comprehensive Environmental Response,
Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980 (CERCLA). The Sup-
plement outlines procedures for Regional staff to follow to
provide notice and opportunity to be heard to potentially re-
sponsible parties on whose property liens are to be perfect-
ed.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $225 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $450). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche! See also PB91-139303. 17p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Hazardous materials,
Waste management, Liens.
0886 Timely Initiation of Responsible Party Searches,
Issuance of Notice Letters, and Release of Information
(Attachment XXII)
Order Number PB92-102060CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 18 Sep 91
The directive re-emphasizes the importance of early identifi-
cation of potentially responsible parties (PRPs) and timely is-
suance of notice letters for the RI/FS. These actions support
the Agency's policy to secure cleanup by responsible parties
In lieu of Superfund use, where such cleanup can be accom-
plished in a timely and effective manner. The sooner PRPs
are identified and notified about their potential responsibility,
the more time they have to organize themselves to assure
responsibility for the RI/FS and cleanup. It also clarifies
Agency policy on release of site-specific information to PRPs
and others. It supplements the information release section of
the Interim CERCLA Settlement Policy (December 5, 1984).
The clarification is designed to facilitate information ex-
change in order to encourage effective negotiation and coa-
lescing by PRPs among themselves. Effective PRP negotia-
tions and coalescing are likely to engender effective settle-
ment discussions with the government.
Specifications: 7p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste man-
agement, Superfund, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
Response.
0887 Transmittai of Guidance on Use and Enforcement of
CERCLA Information Requests and Administrative
Subpoenas
Order Number PB91-139170CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 25 Aug 88
The directive provides an overview of the information gather-
ing tools under CERCLA section 104(e) and 122(e)(3), and
focuses on the steps to be taken throughout the information
gathering process to ensure that EPA is in the strongest po-
sition possible to enforce the information gathering or sub-
poena. The guidance replaces existing guidance entitled,
'Policy on Enforcing Information Requests in Hazardous
Waste Cases,' dated September 10, 1984, to the extent that
the previous guidance addresses information gathering under
CERCLA section 104(e), directive no. 9834.4.
Specifications: 52p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
Hazardous materials, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
Response.
0888 Transmittai of Model Consent Decree for CERCLA
Section 104(e) Information Request Enforcement Actions
Order Number PB91-193417CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 1991
The directive is a guidance document - Model Consent
Decree developed to further support the CERCLA 104(e) Ini-
tiative.
Specifications: 17p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
Hazardous materials, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
Response, Consent orders.
0889 Transmittai of the Final Waste Oil Interim
Enforcement Guidance Document
Order Number PB91-140202CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 30 Dec 86
The Office of Solid Waste and Emergency response has de-
veloped the Waste Oil Interim Enforcement Guidance Docu-
ment. The purpose of the document is to provide information
to the Regions about the technology of the waste oil industry
as well as strategies for enforcement. Waste oil is a very
complex environmental issue owing in large part to the diffi-
culty of tracing waste derived fuels through a complex
system of waste oil dealers. The guidance was developed to
assist those enforcing the waste oil regulations to better un-
derstand the important issues. It is interim guidance because
the regulations for used oil management have not been com-
pleted. As the regulations become complete or changes in
policy or technology occur, the document will be amended
accordingly.
Specifications: 66p.
166
-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Federal Facilities
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management
Hazardous materials, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
Response.
0890 United States Environmental Protection Agency
Model CERCLA RD/RA Consent Decree
Order Number PB91-201673CDH, price: PC A05/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 1991
.The directive is a Guidance Document - Model Consent
Decree (CERCLA RD/RA) to further support Sections 106
and 107 of CERCLA.
Specifications: 82p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management
Hazardous materials, Office of Solid Waste and Emerqencv
Response.
0891 Use of CERCLA Section 106 Unilateral Enforcement
for Remedial Design and Remedial Action: Strategy for
Fiscal Year 1990
-Order Number PB91-139733CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 14 Feb 90
• The directive describes FY90 strategy for enhancing use of
CERCLA section 106 authorities, focusing significantly on
Unilateral Administrative Orders (UAOs) for remedial designs
and remedial actions (RD/RA). The directive supersedes di-
rective no. 9870.1 'CERCLA Section 106 Unilateral RD/RA
Enforcement: Accomplishments through 2nd Quarter and
Strategy for the Remainder of FY 1989,' dated July 11, 1989.
Specifications: 11 p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management
Hazardous materials, Office of Solid Waste and Emerqencv
Response.
0892 Waiver of Concurrence on De Minimis Generator
Settlements
Order Number PB91-138826CDH, price: PC A01/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; 15 Jul 88
The directive authorizes Region I at Type Level 2 of the re-
vised CERCLA civil judicial settlement authorities under Dele-
gation 14-13-B and 14-14-E, providing the Region with dele-
gated authority to transmit de minimis settlements under sec-
tion 122(g)(1)(A) to the Department of Justice, with Head-
quarters consultation. The directive supplements a portion of
directive No. 9012.10-a 'Revision of CERCLA Judicial Settle-
ment Authorities Under Delegations 14-13-B and 14-14-E'
dated June 17, 1988. . '
Specifications: 5p.
Subject index keywords: Refuse disposal, Penalties, Office
of Solid Waste and Emergency Response, Comprehensive
Environment Response Compensation and Liability Act Gen-
erator settlements.
0893 Waiver of Headquarters Approval for Issuance of
RD/RA Special Notice Letters at the Time of ROD
Signature from OERR and OWPE
Order Number PB91-139261CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 26 Sep 88
The report informs the Regions that it will no longer be nec-
essary to obtain prior written approval from Headquarters to
issue special notice letters at record of decision signature
Specifications: 6p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous wastes, Waste treat-
ment, Law enforcement, Superfund, Record of Decision.
0894 Written Demand for CERCLA Cost Recovery
Order Number PB91-204628CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 21 Mar 91
The directive provides updated guidance on the use and is-
suance of written demands. Written demands are used to
formalize the demand for payment of incurred costs plus
future expenditures, to inform potential defendants of the
dollar amount of those costs, and to establish that interest
begins to accrue on expenditures. The guidance helps
assure that the written demand is made early to maximize re-
covery. The directive supplements directive 9832.1 'Cost Re-
covery Actions Under the Comprehensive Environmental Re-
sponse, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980 (CERCLA)',
dated August 26, 1983.
Specifications: 33p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
Hazardous materials, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
Response. •
0895 Written Demand for Recovery of Costs Incurred
Under the Comprehensive Environmental Response,
Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA)
Order Number PB91-228742CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 26 Mar 91
The directive was written to formalize the demand for pay-
ment of costs; to inform potential determines of the dollar
amount of these costs; and to establish that interest begins
to accrue. . ,
Specifications: 31 p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
Hazardous materials, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
Response.
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION:
Federal Facilities
0896 Compendium of Federal Facilities Directives, 1984
and 1983
Order Number PB91-921280CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Aug 91
The compendium is a collection of Federal Facilities direc-
tives issued in 1984 and 1985. The contents includes: Feder-
al Facilities (9272.0-04); Implementation of CERCLA Strategy
at Federal Facilities (9272.0-01); Initial Guidance on Federal
Facilities CERCLA Sites (9272.0-02); Responsibilities for
Federal Facilities (9272.0-03); and Responsibilities for Feder-
al Facilities (9272.0-05).
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 13p.
Subject index keywords: Federal government, Facilities,
Superfund. .
167
-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Field Health & Safety
0897 Future Land Use Scenarios for Federal Facilities
Order Number PB92-182427CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Seattle, WA. Region X; Jul
92
The paper provides background information for predicting (1)
the time required to transfer a Federal property to new own-
ership, and (2) the likely future of a Federal property after
transfer. Making these predictions is a necessary part of the
baseline risk assessment which must be performed on each
Superfund site in compliance with Federal regulations. Key
Issues that are unresolved by current guidance are also dis-
cussed, including the parceling of Superfund properties, the
wauranty of cleanup operations, liability, the use of institu-
tional controls, and occupant protection. The paper empha-
sizes that transfer times and future uses are highly depend-
ent upon the politics of the specific site, the oversight
agency, and the local community. Some suggestions for site
specific surveys are presented.
Specifications: 61 p.
Subject index keywords: Land management, Military facili-
ties, Land ownership, Risk assessment, Land pollution.
0898 Guidance for Federal Facilities on Release
Notification Requirements under CERCLA and SARA
Title III
Order Number PB93-963412CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Nov 90
The document is intended as guidance for federal facilities to
better understand CERCLA and SARA Title II release notifi-
cation requirements.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 29p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Pollution regulations,
Federal facilities.
0899 Military Base Closures: Guidance on EPA
Concurrence in the Identification of Uncontaminated
Parcels under CERCLA Section 120(h)(4)
Order Number PB94-963249CDH, price: Standing Order, call
for price
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; 19 Apr 94
The memorandum is intended to provided guidance concern-
ing the implementation of CERCLA section 120(h)(4). Specifi-
cally, it addresses the approach EPA should use in determin-
ing whether to concur that a parcel has been properly identi-
fied by the military service as 'uncontaminated' and therefore
transferrable pursuant to CERCLA 120(h)(4).
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required ($100 U.S., Canada, and Mexico; all
others $200). Single copies also available in paper copy or
microfiche. 4p.
Subject index keywords: Military base closings, Hazardous
materials, Land pollution detection.
0900 Regional Oversight of Federal Facility Clean-ups
under CERCLA
Order Number PB91-138875CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 25 Nov 85
The directive reemphasizes the importance of oversight of
Federal facilities. The memorandum outlines Regional roles
and responsibilities for Federal facilities oversight, and refers
to the draft 'Federal Facilities Program Manual for Implemen-
tation of CERCLA Responsibilities of Federal Agencies.'
Specifications: 9p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
Hazardous materials, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
Response.
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Field
Health & Safety
0901 Compendium of ERT Air Sampling Procedures
Order Number PB92-963406CDH, price: PC A07/MF A02
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; May 92
The directive provides guidelines for ERT air sampling proce-
dures including SUMMA Canister Cleaning, SUMMA Canister
Sampling, GC/MS Analysis of Tenax/CMS Cartridges and
SUMMA Canisters, Preparation of SUMMA Canister Field
Standards, Low Level Methane Analysis for SUMMA Canister
Gas Samples, Asbestos Sampling, Tedlar Bag Sampling,
Charcoal Tube Sampling, Tenax Tub Sampling, and Polyure-
thane Foam Sampling.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 128p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
Hazardous materials, Air pollution sampling, SUMMA canis-
ters, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response.
0902 Compendium of ERT Field Analytical Procedures
Order Number PB92-963405CDH, price: PC A05/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; May 92
The directive provides standard operating procedures for
field analytical procedures, including the use of Sentex Scen-
tograph Gas Chromatograph; Portable XRF Analyzer; Pho-
toionization Detector - HNU; Photovac 10A10 Portable Gas
Chromatograph Operation; Photovac 10S50, 10S55, and
10S70 Gas Chromatograph Operation; Photovac GC Analysis
for Air, Soil Gas, Water, and Soil; and Micromonitor M200.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 84p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
Hazardous materials, Air pollution detection, Gas analysis,
Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response.
168
-------
0903 Compendium of ERT Groundwater Sampling
Procedures
Order Number PB91-921275CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Jan 91
The Compendium of Groundwater Sampling Procedures de-
scribes methods used for preventing or reducing cross-con-
, lamination, and provides general guidelines for sampling
equipment decontamination procedures at a hazardous
waste site. Preventing or minimizing cross-contamination in
sampled media and in samples is important for preventing
the introduction of error into sampling results and for protect-
ing the health and safety of site personnel.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 69p.
Subject index keywords: Ground water, Hazardous materi-
als, Waste disposal, Superfund.
0904 Compendium of ERT Soil Sampling and Surface
Geophysics Procedures
Order Number PB91-921273CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Jan 91
The compendium of soil sampling and surface geophysics
procedures describes methods used for preventing or reduc-
ing cross-contamination, and provides general guidelines for
sampling equipment decontamination procedures at hazard-
pus waste site. Preventing or minimizing cross-contamination
in sampled media and in samples is important for preventing
the introduction of eror into sampling results and for protect-
ing the health and safety of site personnel.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 43p.
Subject index keywords: Sampling, Soils, Hazardous mate-
rials, Superfund.
0905 Compendium of ERT Surface Water and Sediment
Sampling Procedures
Order Number PB91-921274CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Jan 91
The Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) describes methods
used for preventing or reducing cross-contamination, and
provides general guidelines for sampling equipment decon-
tamination procedures at a hazardous waste site. Preventing
or minimizing cross-contamination in sampled media and in
samples is important for preventing the introduction of error
into sampling results and for protecting the health and safety
of site personnel.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 30p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Surface
waters, Sediments, Superfund.
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Reid Health &
Safety
0906 Compendium of ERT Toxicity Testing Procedures
Order Number PB91-921271CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Jan 91
The compendium documents the procedure for conducting a
standard reference toxicity test using sodium pentachloro-
phenate (NaPCP) as the toxicant and larval Pimephales pro-
melas (fathead minnows) as the test organism. The test esti-
mates the fitness, condition, and sensitivity of the organisms
used in a definitive toxicity test. It allows for inter- and intrala-
boratory comparisons of toxicity information and provides an
experimental control.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 49p.
Subject index keywords: Tests, Hazardous materials, Tox-
icity, Superfund.
0907 Compendium of ERT Waste Sampling Procedures
Order Number PB91-921276CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Jan 91
The compendium of waste sampling procedures describes
methods used for preventing or reducing cross-contamina-
tion, and provides general guidelines for sampling equipment
decontamination procedures at a hazardous waste site. Pre-
venting or minimizing cross-contamination in sampled media
and in samples is important for preventing the introduction of
error into sampling results and for protecting the health and
safety of site personnel.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 58p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste dis-
posal, Superfund.
0908 Establishing Work Zones at Uncontrolled Hazardous
Waste Sites
Order Number PB91-921342CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Apr 91
The purpose of the Fact Sheet is to summarize the proce-
dures and requirements for establishing and maintaining
work zones, including Support Zones at hazardous waste
sites.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $150 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $300). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 12p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
Hazardous materials, Occupational safety and health, Office
of Solid Waste and Emergency Response.
0909 Field Certification Tracking System (FCTS). User's
Guide. Version 2.1
Order Number PB93-963415CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Jul 93
The document provides step by step guidelines for installing
the Field Certification Tracking System (FCTS), Version 2.1.
169
-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Field Health & Safety
Hardware needs are described as well as where to call for
help.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $225 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $450). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 55p.
Subject Index keywords: Installation manuals, Superfund,
FCTS(Field Certification Tracking System).
0910 Field Standard Operating Procedures for Air
Surve|llance F.S.O.P. No. 8
Order Number PB91-213843CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; 1 Jan 85
The directive describes air monitoring procedures for use by
field personnel in obtaining air monitoring data required to
minimize the risk of exposure to personnel at hazardous sub-
stance release sites.
Specifications: 27p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
Hazardous materials, Occupational safety and health, Air pol-
lution monitoring, Risk assessment, Office of Solid Waste
and Emergency Response.
0911 Reid Standard Operating Procedures for
Establishing Work Zones (F.S.O.P. 6)
Order Number PB91-213827CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 1 Apr 85
The directive describes procedures to be used by field per-
sonnel In establishing work zones for control of hazardous
materials to minimize the risk of exposure to workers at haz-
ardous release sites.
Specifications: 23p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
Hazardous materials, Risk assessment, Occupational safety
and health, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response.
0912 Field Standard Operating Procedures for
Preparation of a Site Safety Plan F.S.O.P. No. 9
Order Number PB91:213835CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 1 Apr 85
The directive establishes requirements for protecting health
and safety of field personnel during all activities conducted at
the site of an incident. The manual contains safety informa-
tion, instructions, and procedures to cover a variety of situa-
tions commonly encountered in this type of field work.
Specifications: 30p.
Subject index keywords: Occupational safety and health,
Superfund, Waste management, Hazardous materials, Risk
assessment, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Re-
sponse.
0913 Field Standard Operating Procedures for the
Decontamination of Response Personnel F.S.O.P. No. 7
Order Number PB91-213850CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; 1 Jan 85
The directive describes approved operating procedures for
decontamination of response personnel and equipment at
hazardous substance release sites.
Specifications: 33p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
Hazardous materials, Decontamination, Occupational safety
and health, Equipment, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
Response.
0914 Hazardous Waste Operations and Emergency
Response: RCRA TSD and Emergency Response Without
Regard to Location
Order Number PB91-921340CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Apr 91
The purpose of the Fact Sheet is to explain the principle re-
quirements of the EPA and OSHA worker protection stand-
ards as they apply to employees who perform emergency re-
sponse operations irrespective of location and employees
who perform hazardous waste operations at RCRA TSD fa-
cilities.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $150 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $300). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 12p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
Hazardous materials, Occupational safety and health, Office
of Solid Waste and Emergency Response.
0915 Hazmat Team Planning Guidance
Order Number PB90-274523CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 90
The manual will assist local fire departments in identifying,
acquiring, and maintaining the hazardous materials response
equipment and trained personnel appropriate for their locale.
The manual offers guidance in the following areas: Determin-
ing actual hazmat response requirements; Establishing the
goals and levels of expertise needed to meet those require-
ments; Estimating the costs and developing a budget to
meet your goals; and Preparing response plans and standard
operating procedures (SOPs) to include the entire local re-
sponse community.
Specifications: 60p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Directories,
Fire departments.
0916 Health and Safety Audit Guidelines: SARA Title I,
Section 126
Order Number PB90-204157CDH, price: PC A06/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Dec 89
The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Audit Guidelines
provide step-by-step guidance for assessing preliminary eval-
uations, health and safety plans (HASPs), and off-site emer-
gency response programs required under the Occupational
Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) and EPA worker
protection standards. Employees affected by the EPA stand-
ards will primarily be those State and local government em-
ployees engaged in hazardous waste operations at hazard-
ous waste sites and State and local off-site emergency re-
sponse personnel. The Guidelines address two major com-
ponents of the OSHA/EPA worker protection standards:
health and safety provisions at uncontrolled hazardous waste
sites and off-site emergency response.
Specifications: 109p.
170
-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Field Health &
Safety
Subject index keywords: Auditing, Safety, Environmental
surveys, Occupational safety and health, Toxic substances,
Emergency preparedness.
0917 Health and Safety Plan (HASP) User's Guide
(Version 3.0/4.0)
Order Number PB93-963414CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Jul 93
HASP (Health and Safety Planner) Version 3.0/4.0 is a soft-
ware program that generates a site-specific safety plan using
an automated decision-making process. HASP recommends
the required levels of protection (such as respirators and per-
sonal protective equipment) based on the tasks being per-
formed and the chemicals that will be encountered. HASP in-
cludes standard protocols for 'typical' waste remediation and
assessment activities, and the health and safety plan format
is consistent with OSHA's 29 CFR 1910.120 and U.S. EPA's
40 CFR 311 requirements. The HASP is a mobile, field-
usable instrument, containing a database of information on
110 commonly occurring chemicals. The chemical database
used in developing the HASP also contains information on
an additional 2,500 chemicals.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 29p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Occupational safety
and health, Remediation.
0918 Health and Safety Roles and Responsibilities at
Remedial Sites
Order Number PB91-921362CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Apr 91
The purpose of the fact sheet is to define the major compo-
nents of the health and safety program and to delineate the
health and safety roles and responsibilities for Remedial
Project Managers (RPMs), lead parties/agencies, and con-
tractors during the remedial action phase of Superfund
cleanups. It addresses the various roles of all parties in the
overall health and safety program for a site, with emphasis
on Occupational Safety and Health Act/Agency (OSHA)
compliance.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $150 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $300). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 6p.
Subject index keywords: Safety, Public health, Hazardous
materials, Superfund.
0919 Importance of Quality for Collection of
Environmental Samples. Planning, Implementing, and
Assessing Field Sampling Quality at CERCLA Sites
Order Number PB91-218941CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Quality
Assurance Management Staff; 26 Jun 91
The most neglected aspects of environmental data collection
operations have been in the areas of sampling design and
sample collection. For years, most major environmental data
QA/QC efforts have focused on the laboratory operations,
with either the tacit assumption that sampling activities had
been properly designed and implemented, or with very little
attention given at all to the quality of field or sampling oper-
ations. Infrequent data quality analyses did result in the rec-
ognition that major error sources were undoubtedly associat-
ed with the sampling components of environmental data col-
lection. However, little was generally done to address or
remedy these recognized data quality shortfalls. The paper
will illustrate the importance of adequate planning, implemen-
tation, and assessment of field sampling work in the context
of the Environmental Protection Agency's Superfund pro-
gram.
Specifications: 12p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Sampling, Site sur-
veys, Waste disposal, Management planning.
0920 OSWER Integrated Health and Safety Policy
Order Number PB90-258344CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; 16 Aug 88
The policy articulates the requirement for all EPA employees
to comply with Occupational Health and Safety Administra-
tion (OSHA) as well as EPA Health and Safety Directives.
The 27-page manual outlines the conditions of this policy
and the roles and responsibilities of EPA employees in meet-
ing them. The policy applies to all Office of Solid Waste and
Emergency Response (OSWER) employees engaged in haz-
ardous substances response activities.
Specifications: 35p.
Subject index keywords: Regulations, Project management,
Occupational safety and health, Superfund, Office of Solid
Waste and Emergency Response, Environmental Protection
Agency.
0921 OSWER Integrated Health and Safety Standard
Operating Practices
Order Number PB93-963401 CDH, price: PC A01/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Feb 93
The directive implements the OSWER (Office of Solid Waste
and Emergency Response) Integrated Health and Safety
Standards Operating Practices in conjunction with the OSHA
(Occupational Safety and Health Act) Worker Protection
Standards, replacing the OSWER Integrated Health and
Safety Policy.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 2p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
Hazardous materials, Occupational safety and health, Office
of Solid Waste and Emergency Response.
0922 Personal Air Sampling and Air Monitoring
Requirements under 29 CFR 1910.120
Order Number PB93-963420CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Aug 93
The Hazardous Waste Operations and Emergency Response
(HAZWOPER) provides a general overview of the worker
protection standards as they apply to operations conducted
at uncontrolled hazardous waste sites. The purpose of the
Fact Sheet is to summarize the HAZWOPER air monitoring
and sampling aspects of these requirements. The Fact Sheet
is composed of five parts: (1) Introduction to Air Monitoring
and Air Sampling; (2) Air Monitoring Requirements Upon Ini-
171
-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Oil Spill & Spill
Management
tial Entry; (3) Air Monitoring Requirements After Initial Entry;
(4) Conducting Air Monitoring and Sampling; and (5) Informa-
tion Sources and Contacts.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $225 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $450). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 16p.
Subject Index keywords: Air pollution monitors, Hazardous
materials, Occupational exposure.
0923 Priority for Health and Safety Requirements,
Especially Medical Surveillance Requirements, for EPA
Employees Who Support OSWER Programs
Order Number PB91-921346CDH, price: PC A01/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; 1 Mar 90
The directive reminds employees that EPA must comply with
OSHA's hazardous waste and emergency response worker
protection rule (29 CFR 1910.120), EPA health and safety
policies contained in EPA 1440 Directives, and OSWER Di-
rective 9285.8-02, 'U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Health and Safety Audit Manual.' The directive gives some
specific details regarding medical surveillance, sometimes
called medical monitoring requirements.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $150 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $300). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 4p.
Subject Index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
Hazardous materials, Occupational safety and health, Office
of Solid Waste and Emergency Response.
0924 Standard Operating Safety Guides
Order Number PB90:249590CDH, price: PC A07/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial' Response; Jul 88
The report includes the Occupational Safety and Health Ad-
ministration (OSHA) regulations as they might apply to haz-
ardous waste workers involved in incident response. The edi-
tion updates the November 1984 edition of Standard Operat-
ing Safety Guides.
Specifications: 137p.
Subject index keywords: Workers, Hazardous materials,
Safety, Superfund, Occupational Safety and Health Adminis-
tration.
0925 Standard Operating Safety Guides
Order Number PB92-963414CDH, price: PC A09/MF A03
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Jun 92
The guides provide information on health and safety and are
to complement professional judgment and experience, and to
supplement existing Regional Office safety procedures. The
document provides guidance for ensuring health and safety
of site personnel who work with hazardous substances or
who work at uncontrolled hazardous waste sites. The guid-
ance is intended for federal, state, and local managers and
personnel at sites where hazardous materials are present.
The SOSG is intended to provide a comprehensive overview
of the information needed by employers to meet their re-
sponsibility to assure the health and safety of employees en-
gaged in operations at hazardous waste sites.
Specifications: Available on Standing Order, deposit ac-
count required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada, and
Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 194p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Safety, Pol-
lution control, Public health, Superfund.
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Oil
Spill & Spill Management
0926 CERCLA Notifications: Emergency Response
Notification System (ERNS) Fact Sheet
Order Number PB92-963411CDH, price: PC A01/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Apr 92
The Emergency Response Notification System (ERNS) pro-
vides a mechanism for documenting and verifying release
notification information as initially reported to the National
Response Center (NRG), the U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA), and, to a limited extent, to the U.S. Coast
Guard (USCG) for response decisions. The initial notification
data may be followed up by various Federal, State and local
response authorities, as appropriate. ERNS contains data
that can be used to analyze release notifications and spills,
support emergency planning efforts, and assist decision
makers in developing spill prevention programs. The fact
sheet provides summary information on notifications of re-
leases of hazardous substances regulated under the Com-
prehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Li-
ability Act of 1980 (CERCLA), as amended.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 2p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
Hazardous materials, Office of Solid Wastes and Emergency
Response, Emergency Response Notification System.
0927 Emergency Response Notification System
Order Number PB90-249715CDH, price: PC A02
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Aug 89
The pamphlet provides general information for the public de-
scribing the Emergency Response Notification System, the
national computer database and retrieval system that is used
to store information on releases of oil and hazardous sub-
stances.
Specifications: 7p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Environmen-
tal surveys, Superfund, Emergency Response Notification
System, ERNS system, Oil spills, Waste management, Data
bases.
172
-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Oil Spill & Spill
Management
0928 Exxon Valdez Oil Spill. A Report to the President
Order Number PB91-213819CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response.; Department of
Transportation, Washington, DC. Office of the
Secretary.**National Response Team, Washington, DC; May
89
Prepared by the National Response Team, the report was re-
quested by the President and undertaken by Secretary of
Transportation Samuel K. Skinner and Environmental Protec-
tion Agency Administrator William K. Reilly. The report ad-
dresses the preparedness for, the response to, and early les-
sons learned from the Exxon Valdez incident. The President
has also asked Secretary Skinner to coordinate the efforts of
all federal agencies involved in the cleanup and Administra-
tor Reilly to coordinate the long-term recovery of the affected
areas of the Alaskan environment. The efforts are ongoing.
Specifications: Prepared in cooperation with Department of
Transportation, Washington, DC. Office of the Secretary, and
National Response Team, Washington, DC. 75p.
Subject index keywords: Oil spills, Water pollution effects,
Prince William Sound, Oil pollution, Exxon Valdez, Cleanup
operations.
0929 Facility Response Plans
Order Number PB93-963408CDH, price: PC A01/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Feb 93
The fact sheet provides general information on EPA's intend-
ed implementation of the Clean Water Act Section 311 re-
quirements regarding facility response plans.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 4p.
Subject index keywords: Oil spills, Regulations, Facilities
management, Oil Pollution Act, Facility Response Plan.
0930 Oil Notifications: Emergency Response Notification
System (ERNS) Fact Sheet
Order Number PB92-963413CDH, price: PC A01/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Apr 92
The Emergency Response Notification System (ERNS) is a
national computer database which provides the only central-
ized mechanism for documenting and verifying incident notifi-
cation information as initially reported to the National Re-
sponse Center (NRC), the U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA), and to a limited extent, the U.S. Coast Guard
(USCG). The initial notification data may be followed up with
updated information from various Federal, State and local re-
sponse authorities, as appropriate. ERNS contains data that
can be used to analyze release notifications, support emer-
gency planning efforts, and assist decision makers in devel-
oping spill prevention programs. The fact sheet provides
summary information on notifications of releases of oil re-
ported in accordance with the Clean Water Act (CWA).
Under Section 311 of the CWA, discharges of oil which: (1)
cause a sheen to appear on the surface of the water; (2) vio-
late applicable water quality standards; or (3) cause sludge
or emulsion to be deposited beneath the surface of the
water or adjoining shoreline, must be reported to the NRC.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 2p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Oil spills, Water pollu-
tion, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response, Emer-
gency Response Notification System.
0931 Oil Spill Contingency Planning: National Status. A
Report to the President
Order Number PB91-921282CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Oct 90
In response to the Exxon Valdez oil disaster, President Bush
directed the National Response Team (NRT) to take a fresh
look at America's readiness to respond to oil spills of nation-
al significance in the countries' major ports and inland water-
ways. The report was done in a compressed timeframe to
provide a representative picture of oil spill planning and pre-
paredness across the country. To accomplish this task, the
United States Coast Guard and the United States Environ-
mental Protection Agency provided a leadership role for the
NRT which directed federal, regional, and local offices to
evaluate the effectiveness of their oil spill contingency plans.
The report represents the combined efforts of hundreds of
individuals, including Coast Guard and EPA On-Scene Coor-
dinators.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 69p.
Subject index keywords: Oil pollution, Pollution control, Su-
perfund.
0932 Oil Spill Prevention, Control, and Countermeasures
Program. Task Force Report
Order Number PB91-213868CDH, price: PC A06/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; 13 May 88
The study was initiated in response to the January 2, 1988,
release of approximately one million gallons of diesel fuel
from the Ashland Oil Facility in Floreffe, PA, and the subse-
quent contamination of the Monongahela and the Ohio
Rivers. The spill was caused by the tank flowed over the sur-
rounding dike and found its way into the Monongahela and
Ohio Rivers. As a result of the spill, fifteen water intakes
were shut down, water supplies to over 2.7 million residents
were disrupted, schools and businesses were closed, and
thousands of fish and waterfowl were destroyed.
Specifications: 104p.
Subject index keywords: Oil spills, Water pollution control,
Water pollution abatement, Contingency planning.
0933 OPA Q's and A's: Overview of the Oil Pollution Act
of 1990
Order Number PB92-963348CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Dec 91
The OPA Q's and A's are part of a series of fact sheets that
provide up-to-date information on EPA's implementation of
the OPA. The first fact sheet provides an overview of the
various provisions of the OPA and the Agency's responsibil-
ities under the new law.
173
-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Public Information &
Outreach
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 7p.
Subject index keywords: Pollution laws, Oil pollution, Water
pollution abatment, Superfund.
0934 OPA Update: Implementation of the Oil Pollution Act
of 1990. Volume 2, Number 1
Order Number PB92-96342QCDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Aug 92
The issue includes information on facility response plans, the
Environmental Response Team, mechanical containment
and recovery of oil, and the recent designation of Areas
under the OPA.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 8p.
Subject index keywords: Oil pollution, Monongahela River.
0935 Overview of ERNS: Emergency Response
Notification System (ERNS) Fact Sheet
Order Number PB92-963412CDH, price: PC A01/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Apr 92
The fact sheet provides an overview of the Emergency Re-
sponse Notification System (ERNS), a national computer da-
tabase used to store information on releases of oil and haz-
ardous substances.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 4p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
Hazardous materials, Oil spills, Water pollution, Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response, Emergency Re-
sponse Notification System.
0936 Update on Implementation of the Oil Pollution Act
of 1990. Volume 1, Number 1, February 1991
Order Number PB91-921370CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Feb 91
The report is one of a series of bulletins intended to provide
up-to-date information on EPA's implementation of the vari-
ous provisions of the Oil Pollution Act of 1990 (OPA). Each
'Update' highlights activities of EPA headquarters and field
staff as they develop and enforce the regulations and poli-
cies of the high-priority oil pollution program. The 'Update' in-
cludes notes from the Regional Workgroup meeting in Gal-
veston, questions and answers concerning OPA, a timeline
of major EPA activities/deadlines associated with the OPA,
and a list of EPA Implementation Workgroups.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $150 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $300). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 6p.
Subject index keywords: Oil pollution, Pollution control, Su-
perfund.
0937 Update on Implementation of the Oil Pollution Act
of 1990. Volume 1, Number 2, April 1991
Order Number PB91-921371CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Apr 91
This is one of a series of bulletins intended to provide up-to-
date information on EPA's implementation of the various pro-
visions of the Oil Pollution Act of 1990 (OPA). Each 'Update'
highlights activities of EPA headquarters and field staff as
they develop and enforce the regulations and policies of the
high-priority oil pollution program. The 'Update' includes a
spill exercise in Baltimore, MD, practical issues on spill plan-
ning/response, the San Diego Oil Spill Conference, the
Exxon Valdez (Lessons Learned and What If), oil spills re-
ported in the U.S. (1988-1990), and interim guidelines for
bioremediation.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $150 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $300). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 6p.
Subject index keywords: Oil pollution, Pollution control, Su-
perfund.
0938 Update on Implementation of the Oil Pollution Act
of 1990. Volume 1, Number 3, June 1991
Order Number PB91-921372CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Jun 91
The report is one of a series of bulletins intended to provide
up-to-date information on EPA's implmenetation of the vari-
ous provisions of the Oil Pollution Act of 1990 (OPA). Each
'Update' highlights activities of EPA headquarters and field
staff as they develop and enforce the regulations and poli-
cies of the high-priority oil pollution program. The 'Update' in-
cludes an overview of EPA's Oil Spill Prevention and Re-
sponse Program, the Bioremediation Spill Response Plan, a
roundtable on the National Contingency Plan (NCP), and oil
spill statistics.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $150 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $300). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 6p.
Subject index keywords: Oil pollution, Pollution control, Su-
perfund.
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Public
Information & Outreach
0939 Integrating Removal and Remedial Site Assessment
Investigations
Order Number PB93-963341CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Sep 93
Increased efficiency and shorter response times are the pri-
mary objectives of integrating removal and remedial site as-
sessment investigations under the Superfund Accelerated
Cleanup Model (SACM). This is based on the assumption
that there is duplication of effort between the programs. The
fact sheet examines areas of duplication and key differences
between the two types of investigations, and describes some
approaches for integrating assessments. The primary audi-
174
-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Public Information &
Outreach
ence for this information is the site assessment community
which includes EPA On-Scene Coordinators (OSCs) and Site
Assessment Managers (SAMs), their counterparts in state or
other federal agencies, and assessment contractors.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 8p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Site characterization,
Risk assessment.
0940 Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Cleanup
Efforts Nationwide (Bog Creek Farm)
Order Number PB92-963612CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 1992
The Superfund at Work bulletin series profiles hazardous
waste cleanup efforts nationwide. This issue profiles the Bog
Creek Farm site, a chicken farm in Howell Township, New
Jersey, where chemical solvents and other wastes were
dumped between 1973 and 1974.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 8p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
Hazardous materials, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
Response.
0941 Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Cleanup
Efforts Nationwide (City Industries)
Order Number PB92-963619CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 1992
The Fact Sheet profiles the EPA's successful cleanup of City
Industries, a former waste handling facility. Because of quick
and effective cooperation between the U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency (EPA) and the Florida Department of Envi-
ronmental Regulation (FDER) eliminated the threats posed
by the City Industries hazardous waste site in the community
of Goldenrod, Florida. The decisive actions taken by EPA
and FDER at City Industries illustrate Superfund's commit-
ment to protecting citizens and the environment, as well as
the Agency's diligence in making polluters pay for cleaning
up the environmental damage they have caused.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 7p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Hazardous materials,
Waste management, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
Response.
0942 Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Cleanup
Efforts Nationwide, Fail 1992. (American Thermostat
Corporation, New York)
Order Number PB92-963627CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 1992
EPA's Superfund program decisively mitigated dangerously
high levels of toxic chemicals at New York's American Ther-
mostat Corporation (ATC) hazardous waste site. Superfund
staff: quickly sampled area drinking wells and treated over 10
million gallons of contaminated ground water; used innova-
tive technologies to reduce on-site soil and ground water
contamination; secured a permanent alternate water supply
for affected residents; and initiated a public outreach effort
which gained support for cleanup activities. The American
Thermostat site is a prime example of EPA's commitment to
preserve the health and welfare of citizens and the environ-
ment.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 6p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Remedial
action, Waste management, Superfund, South Cairo(New
York), Cleanup operations.
0943 Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Cleanup
Efforts Nationwide, Fall 1992. (Celanese Corporation Site
Profile)
Order Number PB92-963617CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 1992
The fact sheet discusses the Superfund site Celanese Cor-
poration in Shelby, NC. The U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency's (EPA) Superfund program has reached some major
milestones at a hazardous waste site in Shelby, North Caroli-
na. The site's success is underscored by the fact that the
polluter, Hoechst-Celanese Corporation, took the initiative to
perform the cleanup of the hazardous waste found on their
property.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 8p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
Hazardous materials.
0944 Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Cleanup
Efforts Nationwide, Fall 1992. (Ciba-Geigy Corporation,
Mclntosh, Alabama)
Order Number PB92-963630CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 1992
On March 31, 1992, the U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) reached an agreement with Ciba-Geigy Corpo-
ration in Mclntosh, Alabama to clean up soil and ground
water contaminated by DDT, herbicides, and chemicals. The
agreement is one of the largest private party settlements in
Sdperfund history, valued at approximately $120 million. EPA
activities at the site included: conducting preliminary contami-
nation investigations jointly with the Alabama Environmental
Health Administration, beginning in 1979; designing a multi-
phased cleanup that is responsive to the complex nature of
the contamination and reduces potential risk to the local
population and environment; and awarding a grant to a com-
munity group to help them participate in cleanup decisions.
Ciba-Geigy, like EPA, has made consistent efforts to build
and maintain good relations with the community. These ef-
forts demonstrate the increasing trend toward cooperation
between industries, local communities, and EPA at Super-
fund sites.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
175
-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Public Information &
Outreach
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 6p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Remedial action,
Waste management, Hazardous materials,
MclntoshfAlabama), Cleanup operations.
0945 Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Cleanup
Efforts Nationwide, Fall 1992. (Krysowaty Farm,
Hillsborough, New Jersey)
Order Number PB92-963629CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 1992
The one-acre dump at Krysowaty Farm was small in size
compared to some other Superfund sites. But five years of
dumping proved to be a challenge when designing an appro-
priate cleanup. Nevertheless, the U.S. Environmental Protec-
tion Agency (EPA) quickly and efficiently alleviated immedi-
ate and potential dangers to the community of Hillsborough,
New Jersey. In less than five months, Superfund staff:
worked closely with community members and Hillsborough
Township officials to ensure an effective solution; funded a
permanent alternate water supply for residents threatened by
contaminated well water; and completed a permanent clean-
up of hazardous wastes at the site. Krysowaty Farm is a
good example of how an active community, coupled with
EPA responsiveness and expertise, can eliminate the dan-
gers posed by the unauthorized dumping of hazardous sub-
stances.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 6p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Hazardous materials,
Remedial action, Waste management, Hillsborough
Township(New Jersey), Cleanup operations.
0946 Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Cleanup
Efforts Nationwide, Fall 1992. (Lansdowne Radioactive
Residence Site Profile)
Order Number PB92-963625CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 1992
The fact sheet gave a general overview of the Superfund
clean-up of a Lansdowne, PA house, the only residential site
placed on the EPA's National Priorities List and the first non-
federal radiation site cleaned up under Superfund. The base-
ment of the house had been Dr. Dicran Kabakjian's unregu-
lated radium processing laboratory from 1924 to 1944. The
house and the soil surrounding it had to be completely
cleared away because both were seriously contaminated with
radon gas and gamma radiation. As a result, the EPA estab-
lished the precedent for setting radiation levels in residential
areas, applying moire stringent levels than those set by the
Uranium Mill Tailings Radiation Control Act of 1978.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 10p.
Subject index keywords: Pennsylvania, Radioactive wastes,
Waste disposal, Superfund, Lansdowne(Pennsylvania).
0947 Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Cleanup
Efforts Nationwide, Fall 1992. (Valley of the Drums,
Bullitt County, Kentucky)
Order Number PB92-963618CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 1992
The Superfund program was designed to mitigate the dan-
gers posed by improper disposal of hazardous waste. The
A.L. Taylor site, also known as 'Valley of the Drums', was
one of the first challenges to Superfund. Valley of the Drums
was the scene of one of the largest drum removals in the
history of the program. The successful cleanup was accom-
plished through some notable achievements, including: a sig-
nificant reduction of risks to local citizens and the environ-
ment due to several emergency removal actions; use of
state-of-the-art cleanup technologies; combined efforts be-
tween the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and
the Kentucky Department of Natural Resources and Environ-
mental Protection (KDNREP); and recovery of $1.8 million of
EPA's cleanup costs from polluters. The cooperative effort
among EPA, State and local groups culminated in a cleanup
of tremendous proportions and a safe community and envi-
ronment.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 8p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Hazardous materials,
Remedial action, Drums(Containers), Waste management,
Bullitt County(Kentucky), Cleanup operations.
0948 Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Cleanup
Efforts Nationwide, Fall 1992. (Wide Beach Section of
Brant, New York)
Order Number PB92-963628CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 1992
Wide-spread contamination of polychlorinated biphenyls
(PCBs) threatened the Wide Beach section of Brant, New
York, a popular vacation resort. EPA's Superfund program
effectively completed a permanent cleanup of Wide Beach in
the span of one year. Other highlights included: a new and
innovative technology to remove PCB contamination; reduc-
tion of PCBs to one-fifth of acceptable levels; temporary relo-
cation of residents who were concerned for their health while
cleanup activities took place; newly paved roads and drive-
ways, re-landscaped yards, and a new storm sewer system;
and restoration of ecologically sensitive wetlands. EPA's
achievements significantly reduced PCB risks at Wide Beach,
and left a satisfied community in Brant.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 8p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Remedial action, Haz-
ardous materials, Waste management, Oil spills, Brant(New
York), Cleanup operations.
176
-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Public Information &
Outreach
0949 Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Cleanup
Efforts Nationwide, Fall 1993 (Big D Campground Site
Profile, Ashtabula County, Kingsville, Ohio)
Order Number PB94-963608CDH, price: Standing Order, call
for price
f n^r°n,mental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
bond Waste and Emergency Response; 1993
A quarter mile from the old Big D Campground, a sand and
gravel quarry in Ashtabula County, Ohio served as a landfill
for solvents, caustic chemicals and oily substances. High-
lights of the overall effort included: Destruction of 93 000
cubic yards and 14,000 drums of hazardous materials- Ex-
traction and treatment of ground water, including a 30-year
monitoring program; and An interactive community relations
program that fostered public participation in the cleanup
process.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S Canada
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 6p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Hazardous materials
Waste management.
0950 Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Cleanup
Efforts Nationwide, Fall 1993 (Brown Wood Preserving
Site Profile, Suwanee County, Florida)
Order Number PB94-963601CDH, price: Standing Order call
for price
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
bolid Waste and Emergency Response; 1993
The Superfund at Work bulletin series profiles hazardous
waste cleanup efforts nationwide. This issue profiles the
Brown Wood Preserving Site near Live Oak, Florida, where
creosote and other toxic chemicals used for pressure-treat-
ing lumber and other wood products polluted 55 acres of
Suwanee County, Florida. Much of the indigenous wildlife
disappeared from the area due to progressive soil and sur-
Sff W5er contaminat'on. Cleanup activities costing nearly
$2.8 million were funded by the facility owners under a coop-
erative settlement agreement, called a consent decree.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 6p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Hazardous materials
Waste management.
0951 Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Cleanup
Efforts Nationwide, Fall 1993 (Bunker Hill Site Profile
Silver Valley, Northern Idaho)
Order Number PB94-963604CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
bolid Waste and Emergency Response; 1993
Residents in the communities surrounding the Bunker Hill
smelter facility in northern Idaho faced a dangerous problem-
extensive lead contamination from decades of refining mined
ores. Stack emissions caused a variety of environmental and
human health problems. Other organizations intervened to
conduct a variety of activities including: A lead health screen-
ing and education program; Removal and replacement of
contaminated soil at public parks and playgrounds; Removal
and replacement of contaminated residential yard soil; and
Efforts to rebuild the local economy following the facility's
closure. ,
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 6p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste dis-
posal, Cleanup, Superfund, Northern Region(ldaho).
0952 Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Cleanup
Efforts Nationwide, Fall 1993 (Johns-Manville Site Profile,
Illinois)
Order Number PB94-963602CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 1993
The Superfund at Work Bulletin senes profiles hazardous
waste cleanup efforts nationwide. This issue profiles the
Johns-Manville Superfund site. Manufacturing wastes laden
with asbestos and toxic substances were dumped for more
than 70 years into pits forming an enormous landfill. Industri-
al wastewater pooled into acres of settling ponds. Airborne
asbestos endangered workers and threatened ecological
habitat in an adjacent state park and along Lake Michigan.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 6p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Asbestos,
Cleanup, Superfund, Pollution control, Heavy metals,
Profile(lllinois).
0953 Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Cleanup
Efforts Nationwide (McKin Company)
Order Number PB92-963620CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 1992
The Fact Sheet profiles the McKin Company Site, a waste
collection, transfer, and disposal facility in Gray, Maine, and
that site's successful cleanup. The McKin site is hailed as
one of the most successful Superfund cleanups in New Eng-
land and the nation. The site has proven to be a landmark
achievement in public and private cooperation since its dis-
covery over ten years ago. The U.S. Environmental Protec-
tion Agency (EPA), the State of Maine, local officials, and
companies responsible for contributing to the contamination
worked closely together to identify threats to the community
and the surrounding area, remove hazardous liquids, and de-
contaminate 12,000 cubic yards of polluted soil. The resi-
dents of Gray, Maine can now rest assured that hazardous
waste at the McKin site no longer threatens their community.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 9p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Hazardous materials,
Waste management, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
Response.
177
-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Public Information &
Outreach
0954 Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Cleanup
Efforts Nationwide, Spring 1993 (French Limited Site
Profile, Harris County, Texas)
Order Number PB93-963609CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 1993
The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) negotiated
a major cleanup at the French Limited site, working with the
Texas Water Commission (TWC) and the French Limited
Task Group (FLTG). EPA's Superfund program: employed an
innovative technology to clean up 300,000 cubic yards of
hazardous waste; negotiated an agreement, known as a con-
sent decree, in which FLTG pays for all cleanup costs and
future oversight expenses; ensured the planting and preser-
vation of 23 acres of wetlands near the site; and awarded
the nation's 75th Superfund Technical Assistance Grant to a
local group so that the community is kept informed. Coopera-
tion between all parties demonstrates how the Superfund
program cleans up hazardous waste sites.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 6p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Texas, Hazardous ma-
terials, Waste disposal, Remedial action, Cleanup operations,
Bioremedlation.
0955 Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Cleanup
Efforts Nationwide, Spring 1993 (Fulton Terminals Site
Profile, Oswego County, NY)
Order Number PB93-963616CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 1993
The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) achieved
some unique successes at the Fulton Terminals hazardous
waste site in New York. After 35 years as a manufacturing
facility, millions of gallons of waste oils and sludges were im-
properly stored here enroute to an incinerator. Tank leaks
and spillage contaminated soil, ground water and the
Oswego River. EPA's Superfund program: Settled with 59 of
60 hazardous waste contributors to conduct a comprehen-
sive $4 million cleanup and reimburse EPA $500,000 for past
costs; Created an unprecedented financial arrangement that
guaranteed payments from both major and minor parties, en-
suring the timely cleanup of the site; and Worked with area
citizens to award a Technical Assistance Grant, ensuring
their participation in the selection of the remedy and in the
oversight of cleanup operations.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $225 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $450). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 6p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste disposal, Haz-
ardous materials, Pollution control, Fulton(New York).
0956 Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Cleanup
Efforts Nationwide, Spring 1993 (Harvey and Knott Drum
Site, New Castle County, Delaware)
Order Number PB93-963614CDH, price: PC A01/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 1993
From 1963 to 1969, two acres of the Harvey and Knott Drum
site in New Castle County, Delaware served as an open
dump and burning area for sanitary, municipal, and industrial
wastes. Sludge, paint pigment, and solvents contaminated
the site until the State of Delaware and the U.S. Environmen-
tal Protection Agency (EPA) intervened in 1981. Site condi-
tions required a combination of traditional cleanup measures.
After the immediate health threats posed by the site were
eliminated, EPA reached an innovative, 'mixed funding set-
tlement for long-term cleanup with two parties responsible
for the site contamination. The following actions highlight the
success of the Superfund program: An emergency removal
of contaminants reduced immediate environmental and
public health effects; A rapid assessment of ground water
safeguarded drinking water supplies; and The full coopera-
tion of General Motors (GM) expedited implementation of the
cleanup, valued at $3.2 million.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $225 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $450). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 5p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Hazardous materials,
Waste disposal, Water pollution control, New Castle
County (Delaware).
0957 Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Cleanup
Efforts Nationwide, Spring 1993 (Old Midland Products
Site Profile, Yell County, Arkansas)
Order Number PB93-963608CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 1993
The Old Midland Products site in Yell County, Arkansas was
contaminated by hazardous chemicals from operations of a
wood preserving plant. The U.S. Environmental Protection
Aqency (EPA) worked closely with the Arkansas Department
of Pollution Control and Ecology (ADPCE) to select a clean-
up plan to remediate the site, allowing unrestricted use by
1998. EPA and ADPCE actions consisted of: treating over 11
million gallons of contaminated surface water and lagoon liq-
uids; employing a highly efficient, transportable incinerator to
destroy more than 85,000 tons of contaminated soil and
lagoon sludges over a short period of time; installing recov-
ery wells to treat an estimated 450,000 gallons of contami-
nated ground water; and maintaining effective community re-
lations with local residents to address their concerns and in-
volve them in the cleanup process. The site serves as an ex-
ample of how EPA, state agencies, and local residents can
work together to restore the environment polluted by hazard-
ous waste.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 6p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Arkansas, Waste dis-
posal, Remedial action, Hazardous materials, Cleanup oper-
ations.
0958 Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Cleanup
Efforts Nationwide, Spring 1993 (Powersville Site Profile,
Peach County, Georgia) „_.„.,
Order Number PB93-963611CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 1993
The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) encoun-
tered much more than a municipal landfill at the Powersville
site in Peach County, Georgia. Contamination from improper-
178
-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Public Information &
Outreach
ly dumped hazardous wastes and pesticides tainted an old
quarry used for household garbage. Chemicals migrating into
^JZ^ r^ threatened toca" drinking watlr supples
To address these ,ssues, EPA's Superfund program de-
LCHeahUP StrfSgy that included: negotiating" with the
and chemical companies to contain the hazardous
°"sltf. underneath a protective cover; investigating
h£?1nkir!? W«er contamination and extending munic-
pal water Imes to affected residents; and conducting a tai-
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $225 U S Canada
keywords: Georgia, Earth fills, Pesticides,
Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Cleanup
rts Nationwide, Spring 1993 (Radium Chemical Site
>, Queens, New York)
Order Number PB93-963612CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 1993
The Radium Chemical hazardous waste site in Queens New
York was contaminated with radium, posing a grave potential
Anp™ °/Pp^COTTty- The U'S- Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) used the Superfund program to design a long-
te m cleanup for the site using input from citizeni and the
business community. Superfund staff: Mobilized a quick
cleanun action to remove 10,000 small containers of radium-
ed a streamlined approach to long-term cleanup- Se-
the site to reduce the possibility of radiation exposure
to the local residents; Cooperated with the community to
I-prganized emergency response plan; and Edu-
citizens about site hazards, incorporating commu-
into the cleanup process. The Radium Chemi-
cal site is a clear example of EPA's effective management
and problem-solving strategies at Superfund sites. a9ement
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $225 U.S Canada
and Mexico; all others $450). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 6p.
mS!t?inRfmkHeyW°rtdS: New York' Superfund, Radioactive
materials, Remedial action.
°9!« JU£,e7-Und % W°rk: Hazardous Waste Cleanup
IKaSaT ' SPri"9 1"3
-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Public Information &
Outreach
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste dis-
posal, Cleanup, Superfund, York County(Virginia).
0964 Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Cleanup
Efforts Nationwide, Summer 1993 (Coal Creek Site
Profile, Chehalis, Washington)
Order Number PB94-963609CDH, price: Standing Order, call
for price
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 1993
The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) designed a
remedy that will permanently remove polychlorinated biphen-
yls (PCBs), lead, and copper from the Coal Creek site in
Chehalis, Washington. Through careful negotiations, EPA se-
cured the participation of all 86 waste contributors to con-
duct the cleanup, valued between $13 and $15 million. The
Coal Creek site illustrates the need for a federal enforcement
program to ensure that waste contributors conduct compre-
hensive cleanups that protect citizens and the environment.
EPA took the lead in coordinating cleanup activities, an im-
portant intervention at a time when the state did not yet have
its own hazardous waste cleanup law.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 6p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Hazardous materials,
Waste management.
0965 Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Cleanup
Efforts Nationwide, Summer 1993 (Common Steps in the
Removal Process)
Order Number PB93-963631CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 1993
The Superfund at Work bulletin series profiles hazardous
waste cleanup efforts nationwide. This issue profiles removal
efforts in Region 1. The removal team quickly responds to
hazardous waste emergencies and undertakes early actions
at abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous waste sites. These
activities generally cost less than $2 million and last no more
than 12 months.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 6p.
Subject Index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste dis-
poSal, Cleanup, Superfund, Boston(Massachusetts).
0966 Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Cleanup
Efforts Nationwide, Summer 1993 (Eastern Diversified
Metals Site Profile, Schuylkiil County, Pennsylvania)
Order Number PB93-963628CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 1993
The Superfund at Work bulletin series profiles hazardous
waste cleanup efforts nationwide. This issue profiles the
Eastern Diversified Metals Site in Rush Township, Schuylkiil
County, PA, where more than 350 million pounds of plastic
insulation was found forming an enormous mountain on the
property. This was the firs
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 6p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste dis-
posal, Cleanup, Superfund, Rush Township(Pennsylvania),
Schuylkiil County(Pennsylvania).
0967 Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Cleanup
Efforts Nationwide, Summer 1993 (Fike/Artel Chemical
Site Profile, Nitro, West Virginia)
Order Number PB93-963626CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 1993
The Superfund at Work bulletin series profiles hazardous
waste cleanup efforts nationwide. The issue profiles the
Fike/Artel Chemical Site in Nitro, West Virginia, where a
composite of highly toxic and potentially explosive contami-
nants were dumped. The site is a good example of how
EPA's Superfund program responds to emergency situations
by taking quick actions as well as cleaning up large volumes
of hazardous waste.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 6p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste dis-
posal, Cleanup, Superfund, Nitro(West Virginia).
0968 Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Cleanup
Efforts Nationwide, Summer 1993 (Northside Landfill Site
Profile, Spokane, Washington)
Order Number PB94-963611CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 1993
Cleanup of the Northside Landfill in Spokane, Washington is
an example of effective collaboration with state and local
governments in addressing a Superfund hazardous waste
site. City officials recognized that the landfill had reached ca-
pacity local wells were contaminated, and ground water
needed thorough treatment. EPA and Ecology worked with
Spokane's Department of Solid Waste Management to: Pro-
vide a clean source of drinking water and construct a state-
of-the-art plastic cover to cap the landfill and guard against
the further spread of contaminants.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 6p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste dis-
posal, Cleanup, Superfund, Spokane(Washington State).
0969 Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Cleanup
Efforts Nationwide, Summer 1993 (Rogue Valley/Ditch
Creek Ranch Site Profile, Wimer, Oregon)
Order Number PB93-963629CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 1993
The Superfund at Work bulletin series profiles hazardous
waste cleanup efforts nationwide. This issue profiles the
Rogue Valley/Ditch Creek Ranch Site in Wimer, Oregon,
where a company president used his own rach to illegally
dump industrial wastes generated at his electroplating facility
in a nearby town. The contamination spread over 18 acres of
the Ditch Creek Ranch, endangering local water supplies and
180
-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Public Information &
Outreach
wildlife This case was the largest criminal action ever taken
in tne State of Oregon for environmental pollution.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U S Canada
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 6p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous wastes, Waste dispos-
al, Cleanup, Superfund, Wimer(Oregon).
0970 Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Cleanup
Efforts Nationwide, Summer 1993 (Tri-State Plating Site
Profile, Columbus, Indiana)
Order Number PB93-963615CDH, price: PC A02
InrLr^,mental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
bond Waste and Emergency Response; 1993
The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) cleans up
hazardous wastes on land, in the air, and in water Each Su-
perfund site is uniquely problematic, therefore every cleanup
selected must meet the specific needs of the community At
the Tri-State Plating site in Columbus, Indiana, EPA removed
27 barrels of electroplating waste from this quiet neighbor-
hood site; demolished on-site buildings and removed more
than 2,400 cubic yards of contaminated soil; and accessed a
municipal wastewater treatment plant to treat polluted ground
water, saving approximately $700,000 in costs. In addition to
trimming five years off the cleanup schedule, EPA addressed
community concerns regarding the actions beinq taken to
remedy the site for future use.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $225 U.S., Canada
and Mexico; all others $450). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 6p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Remedial action, Haz-
ardous materials, Waste management, Water pollution con-
trol, Cleanup operations.
0971 Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Cleanup
Efforts Nationwide (White Chemical)
Order Number PB92-963611CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 1992
The Superfund at Work Bulletin series profiles hazardous
waste cleanup efforts nationwide. This issue profiles the
White Chemical site, a former chemical processing facility in
Newark, New Jersey, where nearly 11,000 drums of hazard-
ous waste and chemical contaminants were stored from
1984 to 1989.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U S Canada
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 8p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Hazardous materials
Waste management, Office of Solid Waste and Emerqencv
Response. a y
0972 Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Cleanup
Efforts Nationwide, Winter 1993. (Wells G and H Site
Woburn, Massachusetts)
Order Number PB93-963601CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 1993
The document profiles the Superfund cleanup of the Weils G
and H site in Woburn, Massachusetts. One year later com-
prehensive cleanup activities have begun at four of the site's
five property areas. Contamination of the wells was discov-
ered in 1979 when local residents suspected that an unusu-
ally high incidence of childhood leukemia was linked to drink-
ing water. EPA's Superfund enforcement efforts yielded a
resolution in which: settling parties agreed to a cleanup
worth approximately $70 million, the largest Superfund settle-
ment in New England. The agreement directs cleanup of four
properties simultaneously; EPA achieved the record settle-
ment in only four months of negotiations; and initially recalci-
trant polluters realized they were better off cooperating with
the Superfund proces, and are working with both EPA and
the community as partners.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 6p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Remedial action,
Waste management, Hazardous materials, Cleanup.
0973 Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Cleanup
Efforts Nationwide, Winter 1994 (Bailey Waste Disposal
Site Profile, Texas)
Order Number PB94-963613CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 1994
The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), the Texas
Natural Resource Conservation Commission (TNRCC), and
10 private companies have succeeded in suspending serious
environmental damage at the Bailey Waste Disposal Site.
Through EPA's Superfund program, the cleanup will prevent
the spread of hazardous petroleum compounds and heavy
metals into valuable wetlands leading to the Gulf of Mexico.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 6p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste dis-
posal, Cleanup, Superfund.
0974 Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Cleanup
Efforts Nationwide, Winter 1994 (New Brighton Site
Profile, Minneapolis/St. Paul, Minnesota)
Order Number PB94-963615CDH, price: Standing Order, call
for price
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 1994
Billions of rounds of small-arms ammunition were manufac-
tured at the Twin Cities Army Ammunition Plant (TCAAP),
supporting the military in three major wars. During the course
of production, solvents and hazardous chemical wastes mi-
grated into area ground water, contaminating municipal and
private wells. Highlights of the overall cleanup effort have in-
cluded^ removal of nearly 232,000 pounds of solvents from
soil using an innovative technology, soil vapor extraction;
treatment of more than six billion gallons of ground water
from TCAAP extraction wells; and construction of two treat-
ment plants to purify municipal water supplies in neighboring
cities. The TCAAP property includes wetlands and undis-
turbed natural habitat supporting an extensive variety of wild-
life. Related cleanup efforts will protect a sensitive ecosys-
tem currently sustained as a refuge despite increasing urban
pressures.
181
-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION; QA/QC Laboratory
Program
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 6p.
Subject Index keywords: Superfund, Hazardous materials,
Waste management.
0975 Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Cleanup
Efforts Nationwide, Winter 1994 (Seymour Recycling Site
Profile, Seymour, Indiana)
Order Number PB94-963612CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 1994
Leaking barrels of chemicals reacted and erupted into spon-
taneous fires and explosions at the Seymour Recycling Cor-
poration in the 1970s. The poorly managed and overbur-
dened hazardous waste storage and incineration facility pol-
luted soil and ground water with solvents, acids, and heavy
metals. With help from the Indiana Department of Environ-
mental Management (IDEM) and the City of Seymour, coop-
erative efforts lead to an effective remediation of the site in-
cluding: an immediate removal of drums, tanks and soil; a
comprehensive ground water treatment system and exten-
sion of the municipal water supply to affected residents; and
use of two innovative technologies, bioremediation and soil
vapor extraction.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 6p.
Subject Index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste dis-
posal, Cleanup, Superfund, Semour(lndiana).
0976 Superfund: Environmental Progress
Order Number PB93-206209CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Nov 90
While Superfund has made many gains in terms of protection
of human health arid the environment, to date little attention
has been paid to any measures other than the number of
sites deleted from the National Priorities List. The report ex-
plains some of Superfund's environmental progress in terms
of new measures called environmental indicators. These indi-
cators relate to: (1) Controlling Acute Threats to People and
the Environment; (2) Achieving Long-Term Cleanup Goals for
Sites; and (3) Removing Contamination from the Environ-
ment.
Specifications: See also PB91-921203. 14p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Project management,
Progress.
0977 Superfund Program: Ten Years of Progress
Order Number PB91-921286CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Jun 91
The review provides a candid self-evaluation of past program
activities and achievements, identifies conflicting mandates
and needs for program enhancements, and makes a commit-
ment to following a practical plan for the future. This plan is
based on a set of eight strategic goals. The contents are:
Legislative and Regulatory Framework; Removal Actions;
Site Assessment Activities; Remedial Activity; The Enforce-
ment Program; Public Participation In Decisionmaking; Roles
of States and Indian Tribes; Management Infrastructure;
Future Directions and Challenges; EPA Superfund Offices;
and For More Information.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 52p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Project
management, US EPA, Reviews, Superfund.
0978 Understanding Oil Spills and Oil Spill Response
Order Number PB93-963409CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Oct 93
The volume contains individual sections that outline what oil
spills are, their potential effects on the environment, how
they are cleaned up, and how various agencies prepare for
spills before they happen.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 56p.
Subject index keywords: Environmental protection, Oil
spills, Water pollution effects.
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION; QA/
QC Laboratory Program
0979 Data Quality Objectives Decision Error Feasibility
Trials (DEFT) Beta Version 1.01. User's Guide
Order Number PB94-963222CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; 2 Aug 93
One of the most intensive steps in the Data Quality Objec-
tives (DQO) Process is the final step, Optimize the Design.
During this step, the entire set of DQO outputs are incorpo-
rated into a sampling design. If the DQO constraints are not
feasible, it may be necessary to iterate through one or more
of the earlier steps of the DQO Process to identify a sam-
pling design that will meet the budget and generate data that
are adequate for the decision. The proposed PC package
should reduce the intensiveness of this step by allowing a
decision maker or member of the DQO planning team to
generate information about several simple sampling designs
based on the DQO constraints. Through this process, the de-
cision maker can evaluate whether these constraints are ap-
propriate or feasible before the sampling and analysis design
team begins identifying a sampling design.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 9p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Pollution sampling,
Data Quality Objectives.
182
-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION; QA/QC Laboratory
Program
0980 Data Quality Objectives for Remedial Response
Activities: Development Process. Example Scenario- Rl/
FS Activities at a Site with Contaminated Soils and "
Ground Water
Order Number PB90-272634CDH, price: PC A13/MF A02
COM Federal Programs Corp., Annandale, VA •
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Mar 87
The two volumes provide guidance for developing data qual-
ity objectives (DQOs) for site-specific Remedial Investiga-
tion/Feasibility Study (RI/FS) activities. Qualitative and quan-
titative standards required to support RI/FS activities are
specified. A formal approach to the development of DQOs in
the sampling/analytical plan to improve the quality and cost-
effectiveness of data collection and analysis activities is pro-
vided.
Specifications: Also pub. as Environmental Protection
Agency, Washington, DC. Office of Emergency and Remedial
onloTIf rept n0" OSWER DIRECTIVE-9355.0-7B. See also
PB88-131370 and PB88-131388. Sponsored by Environmen-
tal Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of Emergency
and Remedial Response. 287p.
Subject index keywords: Waste disposal, Guidelines US
EPA Regions 1-10, Remedial action, Remedial response Su-
perfund.
0981 Data Quality Objectives Process for Superfund
Order Number PB94-963205CDH, price: PC A01/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 93
The fact sheet describes the Interim Final Guidance on the
?olo,Q^'ty 0bJectives Process for Superfund (September
1993). The new guidance supersedes previous 1987 Super-
fund guidance on Data Quality Objectives (DQOs) Data
Quality Objectives for Remedial Response Activities- Devel-
opment Process, EPA/540/G-87/003 (PB88-131370) The
fact sheet also introduces the Guidance for Conducting Envi-
ronmental Data Quality Assessment and the DQO Decision
Error Feasibility Trials software.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U S Canada
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 4p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Hazardous materials,
Data Quality Objectives.
0982 Data Quality Objectives Process for Superfund
Order Number PB94-963207CDH, price: PC A01/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Nov 93
The pamphlet describes the Data Quality Objectives Process
for Superfund.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S Canada
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 2p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Data quality, Pollution
sampling.
0983 Data Quality Objectives Process for Superfund:
Interim Final Guidance
Order Number PB94-963203CDH, price: PC A07/MF A02
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 93
This document provides guidance on developing Data Quality
Objectives (DQOs) for Superfund sites. This guidance re-
places EPA/540/G-87/003, Data Quality Objectives for Re-
medial Response Activities: Development Process (PB90-
272634). The DQO Process is a series of planning steps
based on the Scientific Method that is designed to ensure
that the type, quantity, and quality of enviromental data used
in decision making are appropriate for the intended applica-
tion. The DQO Process was developed by EPA to help
Agency personnel collect data that are important to decision
making. The process allows decision makers to define their
data requirements and acceptable levels of decision errors
during planning, before any data are collected. Application of
the DQO Process should result in data collection designs
that will yield results of appropriate quality for defensible de-
cision making.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 136p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Pollution sampling
Data Quality Objectives.
0984 Data Quality Objectives Process for Superfund-
Workbook
Order Number PB94-963204CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 93
The workbook assists the user in implementing the Data
Quality Objective (DQO) Process for Superfund by providing
concise descriptions of each of the seven steps as well as
space to document the outputs of the current study. The
workbook is organized in a sequential, step-by-step fashion
to help the user consider all aspects in the DQO planning
Process. The steps described are as follows: State the Prob-
lem; Identify the Decision; Identify the Inputs to the Decision;
Define the Boundaries of the Study; Develop a Decision
Rule; Specify Limits on Decision Errors; and Optimize the
Design. Each step is one component in the DQO Process.
The first section of this workbook provides a summary of the
purpose of each step. If more detailed information is re-
quired, the reader should refer to 'Data Quality Objectives
Process for Superfund: Interim Final Guidance,' EPA540-R-
93-071 (PB94-963203). Following the summaries, each step
is discussed in detail, listing all the activities that should be
considered to complete that step.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 42p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Pollution sampling
Data Quality Objectives.
183
-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION; QA/QC Laboratory
Program
0985 Decentralization of Superfund Bottle Repository
Functions
Order Number PB90-249558CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; 1 Sep 89
The directive provides guidance for decentralizing the acqui-
sition of Superfund sampling bottles from OERR to the Re-
gions and their support contractors. It reiterates and expands
on information previously provided to the Environmental
Services Division personnel responsible for bottle acquisition.
Specifications: 43p.
Subject index keywords: Regulations,
Decentralization(Dispersal), Superfund, Bottle repositories,
Preremedial action, Sampling bottles, Office of Solid Waste
and Emergency Response.
0986 Extending the Tracking of Analytical Services to
Potentially Responsible Party-Lead Superfund Sites
(Supplemental Guidance on OSWER Directive 9240.0-2A)
Order Number PB93-963502CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 6 Jul 92
The memorandum provides procedures for tracking Potential-
ly Responsible Party (PRP) analytical services on a national
basis In accordance with EPA policy.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 24p.
Subject Index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
Hazardous materials, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
Response, Potentially responsible parties.
0987 Guidance on Applying the Data Quality Objectives
Process for Ambient Air Monitoring Around Superfund
Sites (Stage 3)
Order Number PB90-204611CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
Research Triangle Inst, Research Triangle Park, NC.;
Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park,
NO. Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards; Mar 90
The document along with a previous document (EPA-450/4-
89-015, August 1989) covering Stages I and II, provides an
illustration of how the data quality objectives (DQO) process
is used to design an ambient air monitoring system that will
be adequate for the intended use of the data. The two docu-
ments combined are intended to serve as a bridge between
the Quality Assurance Management Staff's (QAMS1) DQO
guidance and an actual application of the DQO process at a
Superfund site. The document illustrates the process of de-
veloping a monitoring system for volatile organic compounds
in the ambient air to the point of submitting the design to the
decision maker for approval.
Specifications: See also PB90-204603. Sponsored by Envi-
ronmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, NC.
Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards. 66p.
Subject index keywords: Monitoring, Air pollution, Hazard-
ous materials, Superfund.
0988 Guidance on Applying the Data Quality Objectives
Process for Ambient Air Monitoring Around Superfund
Sites (Stages 1 and 2)
Order Number PB90-204603CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
Research Triangle Inst., Research Triangle Park, NC.;
Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park,
NC. Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards; Aug 89
The document provides direction and assistance on how the
data quality objectives process is used to design an ambient
air monitoring system around a Superfund site. Examples are
given for Stage I (preliminary decision) and Stage II (refine-
ment of the decision and requirements) for monitoring during
remedial action at a hypothetical Superfund site.
Specifications: See also PB90-204611. Sponsored by Envi-
ronmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, NC.
Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards. 52p.
Subject index keywords: Monitoring, Air pollution, Hazard-
ous materials, Superfund.
0989 Harmonization of QA Procedures for Environmental
Data Operations: Development of a National Consensus
Standard for Quality Assurance for Environmental
Programs
Order Number PB91-240523CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park,
NC Quality Assurance Management Staff.; Bechtel
Environmental, Inc., San Francisco, CA.**MAC Technical
Services, Germantown, MD.; Oct 91
Decisions on where and how to clean-up Federally-owned fa-
cilities contaminated by mixtures of hazardous chemical and
radioactive wastes requires that quality environmental data
be obtained. The Federal Government is currently using sev-
eral different standards or sets of requirements for establish-
ing the quality assurance and quality control (QA/QC) proce-
dures associated with environmental data operations for
these sites. These standards defined the criteria for the QA
activities and documentation required, the content and
format of the documentation, and who was responsible for
implementation. Shortcomings in these standards of require-
ments led in 1989 to efforts by several public and private
sector groups to 'harmonize' the multiple sets of standards
and requirements into a single set. These efforts are being
conducted under the auspices of the American Society for
Quality Control (ASQC) and involve participation by the Envi-
ronmental Protection Agency (EPA), Department of Energy
(DOE) Department of Defense (DOD), Nuclear Regulatory
Commission (NRG), and others in the contractor and regulat-
ed communities. The paper describes the progress toward
establishing a national consensus standard for QA for envi-
ronmental programs through the ASQC standard-setting
process.
Specifications: Pub. in the Proceedings of the Annual
Energy Division Conference (19th) of the American Society
for Quality Control, Oct 91. Prepared in cooperation with
Bechtel Environmental, Inc., San Francisco, CA., and MAO
Technical Services, Germantown, MD. 21 p.
Subject index keywords: Waste management, Federal
agencies, Hazardous materials, Radioactive wastes, Environ-
mental issues, Cleanup operations.
184
-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION; QA/QC Laboratory
Program
0990 Quality and Environmental Protection: The EPA QA
Program
Order Number PB92-143791CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Quality
Assurance Management Staff; 1992
Formalized quality assurance (QA) program requirements for
the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) have been
established for more than ten years. During this period, the
environmental issues and concerns addressed by the EPA
have changed. Other issues, such as hazardous waste
clean-up and clean air, remain a focus of national environ-
mental concerns. As environmental issues in the 1980s
evolved, the QA program of the EPA was transformed
through the use of Total Quality Management (TQM) princi-
ples to meet the needs of the 1990s and beyond. The QA
program is structured to provide the necessary management
and technical processes to effectively plan, implement, and
assess the results of work performed in environmental pro-
grams.
Specifications: See also PB91 -240523. 9p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste man-
agement, Quality assurance, Superfund.
0991 Quality Assurance for Superfund Environmental
Data Collection Activities
Order Number PB93-963273CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Feb 93
The fact sheet provides Superfund program participants with
an overview of Superfund QA requirements for data collec-
tion activities. The information is pertinent to all Superfund
site managers, including remedial project managers (RPMs),
site assessment managers (SAMs), and on-scene coordina-
tors (OSCs). The information also applies to Agency contrac-
tors, states, and potentially responsible parties (PRPs) and
their contractors. The fact sheet addresses three primary
areas: (1) the mandatory QA requirements specified in
Agency policy documents; (2) QA management for Super-
fund; and (3) the process for developing SAPs for Superfund
activities. References are identified after each primary sec-
tion to provide additional information on discussion topics.
These reference materials contain guidance on the appropri-
ate quality control (QC) considerations site managers should
include as part of the QA program.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 12p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Hazardous materials,
Waste disposal.
0992 Quality Assurance for the SITE (Superfund
Innovative Technology Evaluation) Program
Demonstrations
Order Number PB90-159872CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk
Reduction Engineering Lab.; Maxwell Labs., Inc., San Dieqo
CA;c1989
The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency has implemented
a rigorous quality assurance (QA) program to ensure that the
performance data generated during their Superfund Innova-
tive Technology Evaluation (SITE) Demonstration projects
are of known and adequate quality to support decisions to
use such technologies for hazardous waste site characteriza-
tions or remediations. A general overview of the ways in
which the QA program has been conducted and of the re-
sults it has produced is presented.
Specifications: Pub. in Air and Waste Management Asso-
ciation, v39 n4 p431-436 Apr 89. Prepared in cooperation
with Maxwell Labs., Inc., San Diego, CA. 9p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste dis-
posal, SITE program.
0993 Quality Assurance/Quality Control Guidance for
Removal Activities: Sampling QA/QC Plan and Data
Validation Procedures
Order Number PB90-274481CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Apr 90
This document provides guidance for establishing, imple-
menting, and using Quality Assurance/Quality Control (QA/
QC) protocols in data collection activities performed under
the Removal program. Also provides guidance in reviewing
laboratory data packages according to the guidance estab-
lished by the QA/QC protocols.
Specifications: 66p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Guidelines,
Quality assurance, Quality control, Superfund, Remedial
action, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response.
0994 Specifications and Guidance for Contaminant-Free
Sample Containers
Order Number PB93-963316CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Dec 92
The document revises specifications and provides a single
source of standardized specifications and guidance on ap-
propriate cleaning procedures for preparing contaminant-free
containers that meet all Contract Laboratory Program (CLP)
detection/quantification limits, including those for low con-
centration analyses.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 32p.
Subject index keywords: Pollution control, Containers,
Equipment specifications, Cleaning, Superfund.
0995 Superfund Analytical Review and Oversight
Order Number PB90-249541CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; 18 Oct 88
The directive outlines procedures and responsibilities related
to review and oversight of Superfund analytical data.
Specifications: 7p.
Subject index keywords: Regulations, Supervision, Super-
fund, Preremedial action, Office of Solid Waste and Emer-
gency Response.
0996 Total Quality Management (TQM) and Quality
Assurance (QA) in Superfund
Order Number PB91-921333CDH, price: PC A01/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; 5 Dec 90
The directive discusses the support of Total Quality Manage-
ment and Quality Assurance by the Director of the Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response. It focuses especially on
185
-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Removal Program
Management
TQM as it relates to Super-fund's QA Program and the devel-
opment of Data Quality Objective (DQOs) for the RI/FS and
RD/RA processes.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $150 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $300). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 4p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
Hazardous materials, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
Response.
0997 USEPA Contract Laboratory Program National
Functional Guidelines for Inorganic Data Review
Order Number PB94-963502CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Feb 94
This document is designed to offer guidance on EPA Con-
tract Laboratory Program (CLP) inorganic analytical data
evaluation and review. In some applications it may be used
as a Standard Operating Procedure (SOP). In other, more
subjective areas, only general guidance is offered due to the
complexities and uniqueness of data relative to specific sam-
ples. This document is intended to assist in the technical
review of analytical data generated through the CLP. Deter-
mining contract compliance is not the intended objective of
these guidelines. The data review process provides informa-
tion on analytical limitations of data based on specific quality
control (QC) criteria. In order to provide more specific usabi-
lity statements, the reviewer must have a complete under-
standing of the intended use of the data. For this reason, it is
recommended that whenever possible the reviewer obtain
usability issues from the user prior to reviewing the data.
When this is npt possible, the user should be encouraged to
communicate any questions to the reviewer.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche" 46p.
Subject Index keywords: Inorganic compounds, Superfund,
Waste management, Land pollution, Office of Solid Waste
and Emergency Response, Contract Laboratory Program.
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION:
Removal Program Management
0998 Authorization for Regional Administrators to
Approve Consistency Exemptions at NPL Sites
Order Number PB92-963343CDH, price: PC A01/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; 24 Feb 92
The purpose of the directive is to provide Regional Adminis-
trators with limited authority to approve exemptions from the
$2,000,000 statutory limit on CERCLA removal actions. This
authority is limited to consistency exemptions at proposed
and final National Priorities List (NPL) sites.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 3p.
Subject Index keywords: Authorizations, Administrative per-
sonnel, Hazardous materials, Directives, Superfund, National
Priorities List.
0999 Conducting Non-Time-Critical Removal Actions
under CERCLA
Order Number PB93-963422CDH, price: PC A01/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Dec 93
The fact sheet summarizes a document entitled 'Guidance
on Conducting Non-Time-Critical Removal Actions Under
CERCLA' (Oswer Directive 9360.0-32). The guidance de-
scribes the essential components of the Non-Time-Critical
Removal Action Process with particular emphasis placed on
conducting the Engineering Evaluation/Cost Analysis (EE/
CA). The guidance is to be used in conjunction with EPA's
Emergency Response Division (ERD) Superfund Removal
Procedure (SRP) manual.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 4p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste dis-
posal, Cleanup, Superfund.
1000 Determination of Imminent and Substantial
Endangerment for Removal Actions
Order Number PB93-963416CDH, price: PC A01/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 19 Aug 93
The memorandum clarifies the process for making endanger-
ment determinations for removal actions pursuant to Delega-
tion of Authority 14-14-A under Section 106 of CERCLA.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $225 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $450). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 2p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Hazardous materials,
Risk assessment.
1001 Emergency Responders Agreements for Fund-Lead
Remedial Actions
Order Number PB93-963418CDH, price: Standing Order, call
for price
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Mar 94
The Superfund program's contractors frequently rely on re-
sponders from the local community to provide emergency
support during remedial action. The fact sheet outlines rec-
ommended procedures to establish site specific agreements
with local emergency responders for fund-lead remedial
sites.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 4p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Superfund,
Emergency services, Lead(Metal), Remedial action.
1002 Exemptions from the Statutory Limits on Removal
Actions
Order Number PB91-921304CDH, price: PC A01/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Nov 90
The Fact Sheet summarizes two exemptions from the statu-
tory time and dollar limits on removal actions provided for in
section 104(c) of CERCLA. The first is the 'emergency' ex-
186
-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Removal Program
Management
emption for when a response action isimmediately required
to protect public health or welfare or the environment. The
second is the 'consistency' exemption for when further re-
sponse actions are appropriate and consistent.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $150 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $300). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 2p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Remedial action,
Waste management, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
Response, Comprehensive Environmental Response Com-
pensation and Liability Act.
1003 Expedited Response Actions
Order Number PB93-963410CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Jul 86
The document summarizes response action procedures in an
attempt to clarify the distinction between expedited response
actions and remedial actions.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 6p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Hazardous materials,
Waste disposal, Expedited response action.
1004 Final Guidance on Implementation of the
'Consistency' Exemption to the Statutory Limits on
Removal Actions
Order Number PB90-274465CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; 12 Jun 89
The directive provides final guidance to Regions on the im-
plementation of the SARA $2 million/12-month statutory
limits on removal actions and exemption from the statutory
limits for 'actions otherwise appropriate and consistent with
the remedial action to be taken' (consistency exemption).
Specifications: 8p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Guidelines,
Superfund, Waste management, Office of Solid Waste and
Emergency Response, Remedial action.
1005 Guidance on Conducting Non-Time-Critical Removal
Actions under CERCLA
Order Number PB93-963402CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Aug 93
The purpose of the guidance is to provide information on the
procedures and activities the U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) uses in conducting non-time-critical removal
actions under the Comprehensive Environmental Response,
Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA) and the National
Oil and Hazardous Substances Pollution Contingency Plan
(NCP). On-Scene Coordinators (OSCs) and Remedial Project
Managers (RPMs) should use this guidance to ensure that
non-time-critical removal actions are conducted in accord-
ance with applicable laws, regulations, and EPA policy. The
guidance focuses primarily on those aspects of the removal
process that are unique to non-time-critical removal actions.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 67p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Remediation, Risk as-
sessment.
1006 Guide to Removal Enforcement
Order Number PB92-963419CDH, price: PC A01/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Jul 92
The fact sheet summarizes a Superfund Removal Proce-
dures volume entitled 'Removal Enforcement Guidance for
On-Scene Coordinators' describing the essential components
of the removal enforcement process along with recent
Agency enforcement initiatives stemming from the Manage-
ment Review of the Superfund Program (the '90-Day Study').
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. See also PB92-963409. 4p. '
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
Hazardous materials, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
Response.
1007 Guidelines for the Cleanup of Clandestine Drug
Laboratories
Order Number PB90-272709CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response.; Drug Enforcement
Administration, Washington, DC.**Coast Guard, Washington,
DC; Mar 90
The document provides guidelines proposed by the Joint
Task Force on illegal/clandestine drug laboratories to assist
State and local law enforcement and health agencies devel-
op a framework for cleaning up clandestine drug laboratories.
The guidelines contain an overview of recommended en-
forcement procedures, as well as safety guidelines and
cleanup strategies.
Specifications: Prepared in cooperation with Drug Enforce-
ment Administration, Washington, DC., and Coast Guard,
Washington, DC. 46p.
Subject index keywords: Chemical laboratories, Drug indus-
try, Drugs, Manufacturing, Toxic substances, Occupational
safety and health. ;
1008 Policy on Management of Post-Removal Site Control
Order Number PB91-921326CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; 3 Dec 90
The directive transmits the OSWER policy on management
of post-removal site control for Fund-financed removal activi-
ties and communicating decisions to States on the use of in-
stitutional controls. It provides procedures to ensure that,
when necessary and to the extent practicable, provision for
post-removal site control at both National Priorities List (NPL)
and non-NPL sites is made prior to initiation of a Fund-fi-
nanced removal action. Procedures are also provided for
communicating decisions to States on the use of institutional
controls when waste is left on-site following a removal
action.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $150 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $300). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 16p.
187
-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Removal Program
Management
Subject Index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
Hazardous materials, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
Response.
1009 Removal Cost Management System: Version 3.2
Order Number PB90-272691CDH, price: PC A10/MF A02
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; May 90
The user's guide for the Removal Cost Management System
(RCMS) is specifically designed to serve as a reference
manual for software used to perform cost projections and
daily cost tracking. The guide can also be used to create
Cost Projection reports, the 1900-55 Form, a Daily Cost
Summary, an Incident Obligation Log, and Site Summary Re-
ports.
Specifications: Also available from Supt. of Docs. See also
PB90-153891.211p.
Subject Index keywords: Guidelines, Hazardous materials,
Superfund, Waste management, User manuals(Computer
programs).
1010 Removal Program Representative Sampling
Guidance. Volume 1. Soil
Order Number PB92-963408CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Nov 91
This Is the first volume in a series of guidance documents
that assist Removal Program On-Scene Coordinators and
other field staff in obtaining representative samples at re-
moval sites. The objective of representative sampling is to
ensure that a sample or a group of samples accurately char-
acterizes site conditions. The document specifically address-
es representative sampling for soil.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 56p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Soils, Re-
moval, Superfund, Representative sampling.
1011 Site-Specific Contracting for Removals
Order Number PB91-215053CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 10 Apr 89
The directive provides direction on the use of site-specific
contracting in as many removal actions as circumstances
allow and lists the criteria needed to do so.
Specifications: 6p.
Subject Index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
Hazardous materials, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
Response.
1012 Superfund Removal Procedures: Action
Memorandum Guidance
Order Number PB9Q-274473CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 90
The directive provides guidance for Action Memorandum,
which are concise written records of the decisions selecting
removal actions, arid the primary decision documents to
select and authorize such actions. The document is the first
volume of a ten-volume series of guidance documents col-
lectively titled the 'Superfund Removal Procedures.' These
stand-alone volumes update and replace OSWER Directive
9360.0-3B, the single-volume 'Superfund Removal Proce-
dures' manual issued in February 1988.
Specifications: 59p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Guidelines,
Removal, Superfund, Waste management, Office of Solid
Waste and Emergency Response, Remedial response, Re-
medial action.
1013 Superfund Removal Procedures: Guidance on the
Consideration of ARARS during Removal Actions
Order Number PB92-963401CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Aug 91
The document is part of a ten-volume series of guidance
documents collectively titled the Superfund Removal Proce-
dures. The specific document presents information recom-
mendations, and examples to aid On Scene Coordinators in
identifying potential Federal and State ARARs, determining
the extent to which compliance with ARARs is practicable,
and documenting ARAR evaluations. The guidance also may
be used by potentially responsible parties (PRPs) when po-
tential ARARs are being assembled by the PRP.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 39p.
Subject index keywords: Removal, Hazardous materials,
Superfund.
1014 Superfund Removal Procedures: Public Participation
Guidance for On-Scene Coordinators: Community
Relations and the Administrative Record
Order Number PB92-963416CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Jul 92
The document is part of a ten-volume series of guidance
documents collectively titled the Superfund Removal Proce-
dures. Each volume in the series is dedicated to a particular
aspect of the removal process. The document summarizes
the relevant public participation guidance and statutory au-
thorities for conducting community relations and administra-
tive record activities.
Specifications: Available on Standing Order, deposit ac-
count required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada, and
Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. Supersedes PB90-192055. 43p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Removal,
Pollution control, Superfund.
1015 Superfund Removal Procedures: Removal
Enforcement Guidance for On-Scene Coordinators
Order Number PB92-9634fJ9CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Apr 92
The document is part of a ten-volume series of guidance
documents collectively titled the Superfund Removal Proce-
dures. These stand-alone volumes update and replace
OSWER Directive 9360.0-3B, the single-volume Superfund
Removal Procedures manual, issued in February 1988. Each
volume in the series is dedicated to a particular aspect of the
removal process and includes a volume-specific Table of
Contents, Reference List, and Key Words Index. The series
comprises the following nine procedural volumes. The docu-
188
-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Risk Management
ment summarizes the relevant guidance and statutory au-
thorities for conducting enforcement activities during removal
actions.
Specifications: Available on Standing Order, deposit ac-
count required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada, and
Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. See also PB90-192055. 41 p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Removal,
Pollution control, Superfund.
1016 Use of Office of Research and Development's
Bioremediation Expertise in Superfund Removal
Program
Order Number PB90-249798CDH, price: PC A01/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; 12 Mar 90
The directive establishes a formal mechanism for accessing
and using the Office of Research and Development's (ORD)
capabilities in the area of bioremediation of oil spills, hazard-
ous substance spills, and Superfund removal actions.
Specifications: 5p.
Subject index keywords: Regulations, Hazardous materials,
Microorganisms, Superfund, Oil spills, Remedial action, Bior-
emediation, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response.
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Risk
Management
1017 Achieving Greater Consistency between Subjective
and Objective Risks
Order Number PB90-229832CDH, price: PC A07/MF A01
Pennsylvania State Univ., University Park. Environmental
Resources Research Inst.; Environmental Protection Agency,
Washington, DC. Office of Policy, Planning and Evaluation;
Nov 89
In the context of a hypothetical Superfund site (or aban-
doned hazardous waste facility), the research examines strat-
egies for achieving a closer match between risk estimates by
citizens and those by scientists. A stratefied sample was
interviewed to represent environmental groups, business,
civic activists, elected officials, and general population. Re-
spondents were given a scenario about contamination of
drinking water from the Superfund site. The scenarios varied
in that some included an uncertainty disclaimer. The other
variation was in terms of how much citizen participation
would be involved in decisions about remedial action, or
whether the state would purchase homes that could not be
sold at a price representing market value before discovery of
the site. Respondents were asked about their level of con-
cern, their perceived risk, and any actions they would take if
they lived near the hypothetical site.
Specifications: Sponsored by Environmental Protection
Agency, Washington, DC. Office of Policy, Planning and Eval-
uation. 128p.
Subject index keywords: Risk, Water pollution, Hazardous
materials, Superfund program.
1018 ATSDR Health Consultations under CERCLA
Order Number PB93-963334CDH, price: PC A01/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 21 Nov 91
The memorandum clarifies issues related to Agency for Toxic
Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR) health consulta-
tions requested under CERCLA by the Superfund removal,
remedial, and site assessment programs.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 3p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Hazardous materials,
Waste disposal, Risk assessment.
1019 ECO Update: Ecological Assessment of Superfund
Sites. An Overview. Volume 1, Number 2, December 1991
Order Number PB92-963335CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Dec 91
The document is an updated framework for ecological as-
sessment in the Superfund Program. It offers a description of
ecological assessment components and a discussion of how
they fit into the Remedial Investigation and Feasibility Study
process. ECO Updates are a series of Intermittent Bulletins
intended to facilitate ecological assessment of Superfund
sites. Individual bulletins may discuss either technical meth-
ods or the management of ecological assessments. These
bulletins serve as supplements to Risk Assessment Guid-
ance for Superfund Volume 2: Environmental Evaluation
Manual (9285.7-01).
Specifications: Please type 43B message. See also PB90-
155599. 10p.
Subject index keywords: Sites, Hazardous materials, Ecolo-
gy, Pollution control, Superfund.
1020 ECO Update: The Role of BTAGs in Ecological
Assessment. Volume 1, Number 1, September 1991
Order Number PB92-963337CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 91
Most EPA Regions have established groups of scientists to
advise and assist site managers with ecological studies pro-
duced in conjunction with Remedial Investigations and Feasi-
bility Studies and Removal Actions at Superfund sites. In
general, these groups are known as Biological Technical As-
sistance Groups or BTAGs, although some regions use dif-
ferent names. The bulletin summarizes the STAG structure
and function in the Superfund process. Its purpose is to help
site managers understand how BTAGs can assist with the
collection and evaluation of site information and ensure that
ecological effects are properly considered. ECO Updates are
a series of Intermittent Bulletins intended to facilitate ecologi-
cal assessment of Superfund sites. These bulletins serve as
supplements to Risk Assessment Guidance for Superfund
Volume 2: Environmental Evaluation Manual (9285.7-01).
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. See also PB90-155599. 6p.
189
-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Risk Management
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Sites, Ecolo-
gy, Pollution control, Superfund, Biological Technical Assist-
ance Groups.
1021 ECO Update. Volume 1, Number 3. The Role of
Natural Resource Trustees In the Superfund Process
Order Number PB92-963369CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Mar 92
The bulletin |s intended to help Remedial Project Managers
and dn-Scene Coordinators work with natural resource trust-
ees during site assessment and remediation. It explains the
authority and responsibilities of trustees, and the responsibil-
ities of RPMs and OSCs with respect to trustee issues. The
goal of this document is to help reduce delays and ensure
compliance with relevant statutes by increasing understand-
ing of trustee issues as they pertain to the Superfund pro-
gram.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. See also PB92-963370. 12p.
Subject Index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
Hazardous materials, Remedial action, Natural resource
trustees, Cleanup operations.
1022 ECO Update. Volume 1, Number 4. Developing a
Work Scope for Ecological Assessments
Order Number PB92-963370CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; May 92
The bulletin is intended for Remedial Project Managers
(RPMs), to help them plan and manage ecological assess-
ments of sites as part of the Remedial Investigation and Fea-
sibility Study (RI/FS) process. As used here, the generic
term work scope describes the process of specifying the
work to be done for the ecological assessment, as part of
the overall Rl Work Plan. The term encompasses project
scoping, development and approval of the Work Plan, and
preparation of the Statement of Work (SOW) for contractors
(at Fund-lead sites). The outcome of a successfully executed
work scope should be an ecological assessment that in-
cludes four essential components: problem formulation, ex-
posure assessment, ecological effects assessment, and risk
characterization.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. See also PB92-963369. 16p.
Subject Index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
Hazardous materials, Remedial action, Ecology, Cleanup op-
erations, Work scope.
1023 ECO Update. Volume 1, Number 5, August 1992.
Briefing the BTAG: Initial Description of Setting, History,
and Ecology of a Site
Order Number PB92-963374CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Aug 92
The ECO Update is a bulletin series on ecological assess-
ment of Superfund sites. The issue highlights the Biological
Technical Assistance Groups (BTAGs) that assist Remedial
Project Managers in managing assessments of whether eco-
logical harm has occurred or may occur at a Superfund site.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 11 p.
Subject index keywords: Ecology, Hazardous materials, As-
sessments.
1024 Ecological Risk Assessment Methods: A Review and
Evaluation of Past Practices in the Superfund and RCRA
(Resource Conservation and Recovery Act) Programs
(Executive Summary Included)
Order Number PB90-137324CDH, price: PC A10/MF A02
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Policy, Planning and Evaluation; Jun 89
Substances released from sites subject to the Comprehen-
sive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability
Act and the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act have
the potential to cause adverse effects to human health and
the environment. Although there are numerous examples of
adverse ecological impacts being caused by releases of haz-
ardous substances and wastes, programs have focused pri-
marily on identification, analysis, and mitigation of potential
adverse effects to human health. As a consequence of the
program emphasis, relatively little information is available
concerning the overall extent of ecological impacts at sites.
EPA/OPA initiated a study of the nature and extent of eco-
logical impacts at CERCLA and RCRA sites re. the methods
that have been or could be used to evaluate ecological im-
pacts at these sites, and past ecological risk management
decisions and issues at OSWER waste sites.
Specifications: 21 Op.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Ecology,
Public health.
1025 Ecological Risk Management in the Superfund and
RCRA (Resource Conservation and Recovery Act)
Programs
Order Number PB90-137332CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Policy, Planning and Evaluation; Jun 89
The report discusses the extent to which ecological concerns
have been used as a basis for decisionmaking in the
CERCLA and RCRA programs. For each program, the report
first identifies areas in which ecological impacts could be
considered, and then examines the manner and extent to
which ecological concerns have, in fact, been taken into ac-
count in program activities. The report concludes with discus-
sion of the major ecological risk management issues that
should be addressed by the Agency if ecological concerns
are to be fully considered in the RCRA/CERCLA decision-
making.
Specifications: 45p.
Subject index keywords: Ecology, Hazardous materials.
1026 Effect of OSHA's Bloodborne Pathogens Standard
on Hazardous Waste Cleanup Activities
Order Number PB93-963419CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Aug 93
Bloodborne pathogens are microorganisms that are present
in human blood and can cause disease in humans. These
pathogens include, but are not limited to, hepatitis B virus
(HBV) and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). In addition
190
-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Risk Management
to healthcare workers, the standard also may affect workers
who handle waste potentially contaminated with blood or
other potentially infectious material during response actions
at uncontrolled hazardous waste sites. The purpose of the
Fact Sheet is to describe the additional planning, training,
and medical surveillance requirements that the new OSHA
standard on bloodborne pathogens imposes upon On-Scene
Coordinators (OSCs) and Remedial Project Managers
(RPMs) during a Superfund response action.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $225 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $450). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 7p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Occupation-
al exposure, Medical wastes, Superfund.
1027 Environmental Asbestos Assessment Manual.
Superfund Method for the Determination of Asbestos in
Ambient Air. Part 1. Method
Order Number PB90-274283CDH, price: PC A06/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; May 90
The report provides a sampling and analysis method for the
determination of asbestos in the air to provide results suita-
ble for supporting risk assessments at Superfund sites. Part
2 presents the technical background and considerations ad-
dressed during the development of the method.
Specifications: See also Part 2, PB90-274291. 121 p.
Subject index keywords: Asbestos, Hazardous materials,
Air pollution, Superfund.
1028 Environmental Asbestos Assessment Manual.
Superfund Method for the Determination of Asbestos in
Ambient Air. Part 2. Technical Background Document
Order Number PB90-274291CDH, price: PC A06/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; May 90
The report provides a sampling and analysis method for the
determination of asbestos in the air to provide results suita-
ble for supporting risk assessments at Superfund sites. Part
1 presents the method to be used.
. Specifications: See also Part 1, PB90-274283. 106p.
Subject index keywords: Asbestos, Hazardous materials,
Chemical analysis, Air pollution, Superfund.
1029 Guidance for Coordinating ATSDR Health
Assessment Activities with the Superfund Remedial
Process
Order Number PB91-214080CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; 22 Apr 87
The directive discusses SARA which mandates that the
Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR)
perform specific public health activities associated with
actual or potential exposure to toxic substances identified at
hazardous waste sites. The document (1) provides guidance
to support ATSDR in meeting its health assessment require-
ments as outlined in Section 110 under SARA; (2) summa-
rizes the various EPA response activities for which consulta-
tion with ATSDR may be requested; and (3) outlines
, ATSDR's management process for citizen petitions.
Specifications: 24p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
Hazardous materials, Toxic substances, Public health, Office
of Solid Waste and Emergency Response.
1030 Guidance for Data Useability in Risk Assessment
Order Number PB91-921312CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
• Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 90
EPA is establishing national guidance for minimum data qual-
ity requirements to optimize the useability of data collected
' under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Com-
pensation, and Liability Act of 1980 (CERCLA). Data useabi-
lity is the process of assuring or determining that the quality
of data generated meets the intended use. The guidance is
•designed to provide data users with a nationally-consistent
basis for making decisions about the minimum quality and
quantity of environmental analytical data that are sufficient to
support Superfund decisions, regardless of which parties
conduct the investigation. EPA workgroups are defining the
current uses and associated quality requirements of Super-
fund data, and developing minimum requirements for each
data use category. The fact sheet provides an overview of
Guidance for Data Useability in Risk Assessment (ERA/540/
. ; G-90/008), highlights key: points of the manual, and details
where additional guidance is found.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $150 U.S;, Canada,
and Mexico; all others $300). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 8p. .
Subject index keywords: Public health, Hazardous materi-
als, Data acquisition, Management planning, Superfund, Risk
. assessment.
"1031 Guidance for Data Useability in Risk Assessment
Order Number PB92-963363CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Jun 92
The fact sheet provides an overview of Part A and Part B of
the Guidance for Data Useability in Risk Assessment. It high-
lights key points of the documents and states where addi-
tional information can be found. The Guidance for Data
, Useability in Risk Assessment provides risk assessors ,and
RPMs with nationally-consistent procedures to plan and
assess sampling and analysis of useable environmental data
for baseline human health risk assessments, and addresses
the useability of radioanalytical data for baseline human
health risk assessment.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 8p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
Hazardous materials, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
Response. "
1032 Guidance for Data Useability in Risk Assessment.
Interim Report
Order Number PB91-921208CDH, price: PC A12/MF A02
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Oct 90
The Environmental Protection Agency has established a
Data Useability Workgroup to develop national guidance for
minimum data quality requirements to increase the useability
191
-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Risk Management
of environmental analytical data in the cleanup of hazardous
waste sites under the Comprehensive Environmental Re-
sponse, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980 as amend-
ed in the Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization Act of
1986 (SARA). The guidance manual prvides direction for
planning and assessing analytical data collection activities for
the baseline human health risk assessment, conducted as
part of the remedial investigation (Rl) process. The guidance
does not address the use of environmental data for purposes
other than baseline risk asssessment for human health.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 272p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Public
health, Data acquisition, Management planning, Superfund,
Risk assessment.
1033 Guidance for Data Useability in Risk Assessment
(Part A)
Order Number PB92-963356CDH, price: PC A13/MF A03
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Apr 92
The document is the first part (Part A) of the two-part Guid-
ance for Data Useability in Risk Assessment. The guidance
provides direction for planning and assessing analytical data
collection activities for the baseline human health risk as-
sessment, conducted as part of the remedial investigation
(Rl) process. It provides risk assesors and RPMs with nation-
ally-consistent procedures to plan and assess sampling and
analysis of useable environmental data. Although the guid-
ance addresses the baseline assessment within the Rl, it is
apprdpriate for use In the new Superfund Accelerated Clean-
up Model where data needs for risk assessment are consid-
ered at the onset of site evaluation.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. Supersedes PB91-921208. See
also PB92-963362, 290p.
Subject Index keywords: Superfund, Risk assessment, Haz-
ardous materials, Waste management, Public health.
1034 Guidance for Data Useability in Risk Assessment
(PartB)
Order Number PB92-963362CDH, price: PC A05/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; May 92
Part B of Guidance for Data Useability in Risk Assessment
provides supplemental information regarding the useability of
analytical data for performing a baseline risk assessment at
sites with radioactivity. While Part A focuses primarily on
chemical contamination, much of the information presented
also applies to the risk assessment process for radioactive
contamination. The guidance offered in Part B is intended as
an overview of the key differences between chemical and ra-
dionuclide risk assessments, and not as a comprehensive,
stand-alone document to assess the risks posed by radionu-
clide exposures. Part A of the guidance should be used side
by side with this document.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. Supersedes PB91-921208. See
also PB92-963356. 85p.
Subject index keywords: Risk assessment, Radioactive
materials, Public health.
1035 Health Effects Assessment for Benzene
Order Number PB90-142381CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH.
Environmental Criteria and Assessment Office; Aug 89
The report summarizes and evaluates information relevant to
a preliminary interim assessment of adverse health effects
associated with specific chemicals or compounds. The Office
of Emergency and Remedial Response (Superfund) uses
these documents in preparing cost-benefit analyses under
Executive Order 12991 for decision-making under CERCLA.
All estimates of acceptable intakes and carcinogenic potency
presented in the document should be considered as prelimi-
nary and reflect limited resources allocated to the project.
The intent in the assessments is to suggest acceptable ex-
posure levels whenever sufficient data are available. The in-
terim values presented reflect the relative degree of hazard
associated with exposure or risk to the chemical(s) ad-
dressed. Whenever possible, two categories of values have
been estimated for systemic toxicants (toxicants for which
cancer is not the endpoint of concern). The first, RfDS or
subchronic reference dose, is an estimate of an exposure
level that would not be expected to cause adverse effects
when exposure occurs during a limited time interval. The RfD
is an estimate of an exposure level that would not be expect-
ed to cause adverse effects when exposure occurs for a sig-
nificant portion of the lifespan.
Specifications: 67p.
Subject index keywords: Benzenes, Hazardous materials,
Industrial hygiene, Toxicology, Environmental surveys, Occu-
pational safety and health, Toxic substances, Environmental
health.
1036 Health Effects Assessment for Cadmium
Order Number PB90-142399CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH.
Environmental Criteria and Assessment Office.; Syracuse
Research Corp., NY; Aug 88
The report summarizes and evaluates information relevant to
a preliminary interim assessment of adverse health effects
associated with specific chemicals or compounds. The Office
of Emergency and Remedial Response (Superfund) uses
these documents in preparing cost-benefit analyses under
Executive Order 12991 for decision-making under CERCLA.
All estimates of acceptable intakes and carcinogenic potency
presented in the document should be considered as prelimi-
nary and reflect limited resources allocated to the project.
The intent in the assessments is to suggest acceptable ex-
posure levels whenever sufficient data are available. The in-
terim values presented reflect the relative degree of hazard
associated with exposure or risk to the chemical(s) ad-
dressed. Whenever possible, two categories of values have
been estimated for systemic toxicants (toxicants for which
cancer is not the endpoint of concern). The first, RfDS or
subchronic reference dose, is an estimate of an exposure
level that would not be expected to cause adverse effects
when exposure occurs during a limited time interval. The RfD
is an estimate of an exposure level that would not be expect-
192
-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Risk Management
ed to cause adverse effects when exposure occurs for a sig-
nificant portion of the lifespan.
Specifications: Prepared in cooperation with Syracuse Re-
search Corp., NY. 60p.
Subject index keywords: Cadmium, Hazardous materials,
Industrial hygiene, Toxicology, Environmental surveys, Occu-
pational safety and health, Toxic substances, Environmental
health.
1037 Health Effects Assessment for Carbon Tetrachloride
Order Number PB90-142407CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH.
Environmental Criteria and Assessment Office.; Syracuse
Research Corp., NY; Aug 89
The report summarizes and evaluates information relevant to
a preliminary interim assessment of adverse health effects
associated with specific chemicals or compounds. The Office
of Emergency and Remedial Response (Superfund) uses
these documents in preparing cost-benefit analyses under
Executive Order 12991 for decision-making under CERCLA.
All estimates of acceptable intakes and carcinogenic potency
presented in the document should be considered as prelimi-
nary and reflect limited resources allocated to the project.
The intent in the assessments is to suggest acceptable ex-
posure levels whenever sufficient data are available. The in-
terim values presented reflect the relative degree of hazard
associated with exposure or risk to the chemical(s) ad-
dressed. Whenever possible, two categories of values have
been estimated for systemic toxicants (toxicants for which
cancer is not the endpoint of concern). The first, RfDS or
subchronic reference dose, is an estimate of an exposure
level that would not be expected to cause adverse effects
when exposure occurs during a limited time interval. The RfD
is an estimate of an exposure level that would not be expect-
ed to cause adverse effects when exposure occurs for a sig-
nificant portion of the lifespan.
Specifications: Prepared in cooperation with Syracuse Re-
search Corp., NY. 54p.
Subject index keywords: Carbon tetrachloride, Hazardous
materials, Industrial hygiene, Toxicology, Environmental sur-
veys, Occupational safety and health, Toxic substances, En-
vironmental health.
1038 Health Effects Assessment for Chlordane
Order Number PB90-142415CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH.
Environmental Criteria and Assessment Office.; Syracuse
Research Corp., NY; Jul 88
The report summarizes and evaluates information relevant to
a preliminary interim assessment of adverse health effects
associated with specific chemicals or compounds. The Office
of Emergency and Remedial Response (Superfund) uses
these documents in preparing cost-benefit analyses under
Executive Order 12991 for decision-making under CERCLA.
All estimates of acceptable intakes and carcinogenic potency
presented in the document should be considered as prelimi-
nary and reflect limited resources allocated to the project.
The intent in the assessments is to suggest acceptable ex-
posure levels whenever sufficient data are available. The in-
terim values presented reflect the relative degree of hazard
associated with exposure or risk to the chemical(s) ad-
dressed. Whenever possible, two categories of values have
been estimated for systemic toxicants (toxicants for which
cancer is not the endpoint of concern). The first, RfDS or
subchronic reference dose, is an estimate of an exposure
level that would not be expected to cause adverse effects
when exposure occurs during a limited time interval. The RfD
is an estimate of an exposure level that would not be expect-
ed to cause adverse effects when exposure occurs for a sig-
nificant portion of the lifespan.
Specifications: Prepared in cooperation with Syracuse Re-
search Corp., NY. 44p.
Subject: index keywords: Chlordane, Hazardous materials,
Industrial hygiene, Toxicology, Environmental surveys, Occu-
pational safety and health, Toxic substances, Environmental
health.
1039 Health Effects Assessment for Chlorobenzene
Order Number PB90-142514CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH.
Environmental Criteria and Assessment Office.; Syracuse
Research Corp., NY; Jan 89
The report summarizes and evaluates information relevant to
a preliminary interim assessment of adverse health effects
associated with specific chemicals or compounds. The Office
of Emergency and Remedial Response (Superfund) uses
these documents in preparing cost-benefit analyses under
Executive Order 12991 for decision-making under CERCLA.
All estimates of acceptable intakes and carcinogenic potency
presented in the document should be considered as prelimi-
nary and reflect limited resources allocated to the project.
The intent in the assessments is to suggest acceptable ex-
posure levels whenever sufficient data are available. The in-
terim values presented reflect the relative degree of hazard
associated with exposure or risk to the chemical(s) ad-
dressed. Whenever possible, two categories of values have
been estimated for systemic toxicants (toxicants for which
cancer is not the endpoint of concern). The first, RfDS or
subchronic reference dose, is an estimate of an exposure
level that would not be expected to cause adverse effects
when exposure occurs during a limited time interval. The RfD
is an estimate of an exposure level that would not be expect-
ed to cause adverse effects when exposure occurs for a sig-
nificant portion of the lifespan.
Specifications: Prepared in cooperation with Syracuse Re-
search Corp., NY. 47p.
Subject index keywords: Chlorobenzenes, Hazardous ma-
terials, Industrial hygiene, Toxicology, Environmental surveys,
Occupational safety and health, Toxic substances, Environ-
mental health.
1040 Health Effects Assessment for Chloroform
Order Number PB90-142423CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH.
Environmental Criteria and Assessment Office.; Syracuse
Research Corp., NY; Apr 88
The report summarizes and evaluates information relevant to
a preliminary interim assessment of adverse health effects
associated with specific chemicals or compounds. The Office
of Emergency and Remedial Response (Superfund) uses
these documents in preparing cost-benefit analyses under
Executive Order 12991 for decision-making under CERCLA.
All estimates of acceptable intakes and carcinogenic potency
presented in the document should be considered as prelimi-
nary and reflect limited resources allocated to the project.
The intent in the assessments is to suggest acceptable ex-
posure levels whenever sufficient data are available. The in-
193
-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Risk Management
terim values presented reflect the relative degree of hazard
associated with exposure or risk to the chemical(s) ad-
dressed. Whenever possible, two categories of values have
been estimated for systemic toxicants (toxicants for which
cancer is not the endpoint of concern). The first, RfDS or
subchrpnic reference dose, is an estimate of an exposure
level that would not be expected to cause adverse effects
when exposure occurs during a limited time interval. The RfD
Is an estimate of an exposure level that would not be expect-
ed to cause adverse effects when exposure occurs for a sig-
nificant portion of the lifespan.
Specifications: Prepared in cooperation with Syracuse Re-
search Corp., NY. 48p.
Subject index keywords: Chloroform, Hazardous materials,
Industrial hygiene, Toxicology, Environmental surveys, Occu-
pational safety and health, Toxic substances, Environmental
health,
1041 Health Effects Assessment for DDT
Order Number PB90-142431CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH.
Environmental Criteria and Assessment Office.; Syracuse
Research Corp., NY; Nov 88
The report summarizes and evaluates information relevant to
a preliminary interim assessment of adverse health effects
associated with specific chemicals or compounds. The Office
of Emergency and Remedial Response (Superfund) uses
these documents in preparing cost-benefit analyses under
Executive Order 12991 for decision-making under CERCLA.
All estimates of acceptable intakes and carcinogenic potency
presented In the document should be considered as prelimi-
nary and reflect limited resources allocated to the project.
The intent in the assessments is to suggest acceptable ex-
posure levels whenever sufficient data are available. The in-
terim values presented reflect the relative degree of hazard
associated with exposure or risk to the chemical(s) ad-
dressed. Whenever possible, two categories of values have
been estimated for systemic toxicants (toxicants for which
cancer is not the endpoint of concern). The first, RfDS or
subchfonic reference dose, is an estimate of an exposure
level that would not be expected to cause adverse effects
when exposure occurs during a limited time interval. The RfD
is an estimate of an exposure level that would not be expect-
ed to cause adverse effects when exposure occurs for a sig-
nificant portion of the lifespan.
Specifications: Prepared in cooperation with Syracuse Re-
search Corp., NY. 58p.
Subject index keywords: DDT, Hazardous materials, Indus-
trial hygiene, Toxicology, Environmental surveys, Occupation-
al safety and health, Toxic substances, Environmental health.
1042 Health Effects Assessment for Methyl Ethyl Ketone
Order Number PB90-142456CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH.
Environmental Criteria and Assessment Office.; Syracuse
Research Corp., NY; Feb 89
The report summarizes and evaluates information relevant to
a preliminary interim assessment of adverse health effects
associated with specific chemicals or compounds. The Office
of Emergency and Remedial Response (Superfund) uses
these documents in preparing cost-benefit analyses under
Executive Order 12991 for decision-making under CERCLA.
All estimates of acceptable intakes and carcinogenic potency
presented in the document should be considered as prelimi-
nary and reflect limited resources allocated to the project.
The intent in the assessments is to suggest acceptable ex-
posure levels whenever sufficient data are available. The in-
terim values presented reflect the relative degree of hazard
associated with exposure or risk to the chemical(s) ad-
dressed. Whenever possible, two categories of values have
been estimated for systemic toxicants (toxicants for which
cancer is not the endpoint of concern). The first, RfDS or
subchronic reference dose, is an estimate of an exposure
level that would not be expected to cause adverse effects
when exposure occurs during a limited time interval. The RfD
is an estimate of an exposure level that would not be expect-
ed to cause adverse effects when exposure occurs for a sig-
nificant portion of the lifespan.
Specifications: Prepared in cooperation with Syracuse Re-
search Corp., NY. 31 p.
Subject index keywords: Methyl ethyl ketone, Hazardous
materials, Industrial hygiene, Toxicology, Environmental sur-
veys, Occupational safety and health, Toxic substances, En-
vironmental health.
1043 Health Effects Assessment for Methylene Chloride
Order Number PB90-142449CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH.
Environmental Criteria and Assessment Office.; Syracuse
Research Corp., NY; Aug 89
The report summarizes and evaluates information relevant to
a preliminary interim assessment of adverse health effects
associated with specific chemicals or compounds. The Office
of Emergency and Remedial Response (Superfund) uses
these documents in preparing cost-benefit analyses under
Executive Order 12991 for decision-making under CERCLA.
All estimates of acceptable intakes and carcinogenic potency
presented in the document should be considered as prelimi-
nary and reflect limited resources allocated to the project.
The intent in the assessments is to suggest acceptable ex-
posure levels whenever sufficient data are available. The in-
terim values presented reflect the relative degree of hazard
associated with exposure or risk to the chemical(s) ad-
dressed. Whenever possible, two categories of values have
been estimated for systemic toxicants (toxicants for which
cancer is not the endpoint of concern). The first, RfDS or
subchronic reference dose, is an estimate of an exposure
level that would not be expected to cause adverse effects
when exposure occurs during a limited time interval. The RfD
is an estimate of an exposure level that would not be expect-
ed to cause adverse effects when exposure occurs for a sig-
nificant portion of the lifespan.
Specifications: Prepared in cooperation with Syracuse Re-
search Corp., NY. 73p.
Subject index keywords: Chloromethanes, Hazardous ma-
terials, Industrial hygiene, Toxicology, Environmental surveys,
Occupational safety and health, Toxic substances, Environ-
mental health.
1044 Health Effects Assessment for Naphthalene
Order Number PB90-142464CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH.
Environmental Criteria and Assessment Office.; Syracuse
Research Corp., NY; May 88
The report summarizes and evaluates information relevant to
a preliminary interim assessment of adverse health effects
associated with specific chemicals or compounds. The Office
194
-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Risk Management
of Emergency and Remedial Response (Superfund) uses
these documents in preparing cost-benefit analyses under
Executive Order 12991 for decision-making under CERCLA.
All estimates of acceptable intakes and carcinogenic potency
presented in the document should be considered as prelimi-
nary and reflect limited resources allocated to the project.
The intent in the assessments is to suggest acceptable ex-
posure levels whenever sufficient data are available. The in-
terim values presented reflect the relative degree of hazard
associated with exposure or risk to the chemical(s) ad-
dressed. Whenever possible, two categories of values have
been estimated for systemic toxicants (toxicants for which
cancer is not the endpoint of concern). The first, RfDS or
subchronic reference dose, is an estimate of an exposure
level that would not be expected to cause adverse effects
when exposure occurs during a limited time interval. The RfD
is an estimate of an exposure level that would not be expect-
ed to cause adverse effects when exposure occurs for a sig-
nificant portion of the lifespan.
Specifications: Prepared in cooperation with Syracuse Re-
search Corp., NY. 35p.
Subject index keywords: Naphthalene, Hazardous materi-
als, Industrial hygiene, Toxicology, Environmental surveys,
Occupational safety and health, Toxic substances, Environ-
mental health.
1045 Health Effects Assessment for Phenol
Order Number PB90-142472CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH.
Environmental Criteria and Assessment Office.; Syracuse
Research Corp., NY; Jul 89
The report summarizes and evaluates information relevant to
a preliminary interim assessment of adverse health effects
associated with specific chemicals or compounds. The Office
of Emergency and Remedial Response (Superfund) uses
these documents in preparing cost-benefit analyses under
Executive Order 12991 for decision-making under CERCLA.
All estimates of acceptable intakes and carcinogenic potency
presented in the document should be considered as prelimi-
nary and reflect limited resources allocated to the project.
The intent in the assessments is to suggest acceptable ex-
posure levels whenever sufficient data are available. The in-
terim values presented reflect the relative degree of hazard
associated with exposure or risk to the chemical(s) ad-
dressed. Whenever possible, two categories of values have
been estimated for systemic toxicants (toxicants for which
cancer is not the endpoint of concern). The first, RfDS or
subchronic reference dose, is an estimate of an exposure
level that would not be expected to cause adverse effects
when exposure occurs during a limited time interval. The RfD
is an estimate of an exposure level that would not be expect-
ed to cause adverse effects when exposure occurs for a sig-
nificant portion of the lifespan.
Specifications: Prepared in cooperation with Syracuse Re-
search Corp., NY. 36p.
Subject index keywords: Phenols, Hazardous materials, In-
dustrial hygiene, Toxicology, Environmental surveys, Occupa-
tional safety and health, Toxic substances, Environmental
health.
1046 Health Effects Assessment for Styrene
Order Number PB90-142357CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH.
Environmental Criteria and Assessment Office; Aug 89
The report summarizes and evaluates information relevant to
a preliminary interim assessment of adverse health effects
associated with specific chemicals or compounds. The Office
of Emergency and Remedial Response (Superfund) uses
these documents in preparing cost-benefit analyses under
Executive Order 12991 for decision-making under CERCLA.
All estimates of acceptable intakes and carcinogenic potency
presented in the document should be considered as prelimi-
nary and reflect limited resources allocated to the project.
The intent in the assessments is to suggest acceptable ex-
posure levels whenever sufficient data are available. The in-
terim values presented reflect the relative degree of hazard
associated with exposure or risk to the chemical(s) ad-
dressed. Whenever possible, two categories of values have
been estimated for systemic toxicants (toxicants for which
cancer is not the endpoint of concern). The first, RfDS or
subchronic reference dose, is an estimate of an exposure
level that would not be expected to cause adverse effects
when exposure occurs during a limited time interval. The RfD
is an estimate of an exposure level that would not be expect-
ed to cause adverse effects when exposure occurs for a sig-
nificant portion of the lifespan.
Specifications: 70p.
Subject index keywords: Styrene, Hazardous materials, In-
dustrial hygiene, Toxicology, Environmental surveys, Occupa-
tional safety and health, Toxic substances, Environmental
health.
1047 Health Effects Assessment for Tetrachloroethylene
Order Number PB90-142480CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH.
Environmental Criteria and Assessment Office.; Syracuse
Research Corp., NY; Feb 88
The report summarizes and evaluates information relevant to
a preliminary interim assessment of adverse health effects
associated with specific chemicals or compounds. The Office
of Emergency and Remedial Response (Superfund) uses
these documents in preparing cost-benefit analyses under
Executive Order 12991 for decision-making under CERCLA.
All estimates of acceptable intakes and carcinogenic potency
presented in the document should be considered as prelimi-
nary and reflect limited resources allocated to the project.
The intent in the assessments is to .suggest acceptable ex-
posure levels whenever sufficient data are available. The in-
terim values presented reflect the relative degree of hazard
associated with exposure or risk to the chemical(s) ad-
dressed. Whenever possible, two categories of values have
been estimated for systemic toxicants (toxicants for which
cancer is not the endpoint of concern). The first, RfDS or
subchronic reference dose, is an estimate of an exposure
level that would not be expected to cause adverse effects
when exposure occurs during a limited time interval. The RfD
is an estimate of an exposure level that would not be expect-
ed to cause adverse effects when exposure occurs for a sig-
nificant, portion of the lifespan.
Specifications: Prepared in cooperation with Syracuse Re-
search Corp., NY. 61 p.
Subject index keywords: Tetrachloroethylene, Hazardous
materials, Industrial hygiene, Toxicology, Environmental sur-
195
-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Risk Management
veys, Occupational safety and health, Toxic substances, En-
vironmental health.
1048 Health Effects Assessment for Trichloroethylene
Order Number PB90-142498CDH, price: PC A05/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH.
Environmental Criteria and Assessment Office.; Syracuse
Research Corp., NY; Feb 88
The report summarizes and evaluates information relevant to
a preliminary interim assessment of adverse health effects
associated with specific chemicals or compounds. The Office
of Emergency and Remedial Response (Superfund) uses
these documents in preparing cost-benefit analyses under
Executive Order 12991 for decision-making under CERCLA.
All estimates of acceptable intakes and carcinogenic potency
presented in the document should be considered as prelimi-
nary and reflect limited resources allocated to the project.
The intent in the assessments is to suggest acceptable ex-
posure levels whenever sufficient data are available. The in-
terim values presented reflect the relative degree of hazard
associated with exposure or risk to the chemical(s) ad-
dressed. Whenever possible, two categories of values have
been estimated for systemic toxicants (toxicants for which
cancer is not the endpoint of concern). The first, RfDS or
subchronic reference dose, is an estimate of an exposure
level that would not be expected to cause adverse effects
when exposure occurs during a limited time interval. The RfD
is an estimate of an exposure level that would not be expect-
ed to cause adverse effects when exposure occurs for a sig-
nificant portion of the lifespan.
Specifications: Prepared in cooperation with Syracuse Re-
search Corp., NY. 77p.
Subject Index keywords: Hazardous materials, Industrial
hygiene, Toxicology, Environmental surveys, Occupational
safety and health, Toxic substances, Environmental health,
Trichloroethylene.
1049 Health Effects Assessment for Xylenes
Order Number PB90:1425C)6CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH.
Environmental Criteria and Assessment Office.; Syracuse
Research Corp., NY; Aug 89
The report summarizes and evaluates information relevant to
a preliminary interim assessment of adverse health effects
associated with specific chemicals or compounds. The Office
of Emergency and Remedial Response (Superfund) uses
these documents iq preparing cost-benefit analyses under
Executive Order 12991 for decision-making under CERCLA.
All estimates of acceptable intakes and carcinogenic potency
presented in the document should be considered as prelimi-
nary and reflect limited resources allocated to the project.
The intent in the assessments is to suggest acceptable ex-
posure levels whenever sufficient data are available. The in-
terim values presented reflect the relative degree of hazard
associated with exposure or risk to the chemical(s) ad-
dressed. Whenever possible, two categories of values have
been estimated for systemic toxicants (toxicants for which
cancer is not the endpoint of concern). The first, RfDS or
subchronic reference dose, is an estimate of an exposure
level that would not be expected to cause adverse effects
when exposure occurs during a limited time interval. The RfD
is an estimate of an exposure level that would not be expect-
ed to cause adverse effects when exposure occurs for a sig-
nificant portion of the lifespan.
Specifications: Prepared in cooperation with Syracuse Re-
search Corp., NY. 52p.
Subject index keywords: Xylenes, Hazardous materials, In-
dustrial hygiene, Toxicology, Environmental surveys, Occupa-
tional safety and health, Toxic substances, Environmental
health.
1050 Health Effects Assessment for 2,4,5-
Trichlorophenoxy Acetic Acid (2,4,5-T)
Order Number PB90-142365CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH.
Environmental Criteria and Assessment Office; Aug 89
The report summarizes and evaluates information relevant to
a preliminary interim assessment of adverse health effects
associated with specific chemicals or compounds. The Office
of Emergency and Remedial Response (Superfund) uses
these documents in preparing cost-benefit analyses under
Executive Order 12991 for decision-making under CERCLA.
All estimates of acceptable intakes and carcinogenic potency
presented in the document should be considered as prelimi-
nary and reflect limited resources allocated to the project.
The intent in the assessments is to suggest acceptable ex-
posure levels whenever sufficient data are available. The in-
terim values presented reflect the relative degree of hazard
associated with exposure or risk to the chemical(s) ad-
dressed. Whenever possible, two categories of values have
been estimated for systemic toxicants (toxicants for which
cancer is not the endpoint of concern). The first, RfDS or
subchronic reference dose, is an estimate of an exposure
level that would not be expected to cause adverse effects
when exposure occurs during a limited time interval. The RfD
is an estimate of an exposure level that would not be expect-
ed to cause adverse effects when exposure occurs for a sig-
nificant portion of the lifespan.
Specifications: 49p.
Subject index keywords: Acetic acid, Hazardous materials,
Industrial hygiene, Toxicology, Environmental surveys, Occu-
pational safety and health, Toxic substances, Environmental
health.
1051 Health Effects Assessment Summary Tables
Order Number PB92-921100CDH, price: Standing Order, call
for price
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC; 1992
The document is an excellent 'pointer' system to identify cur-
rent literature or changes in assessment criteria for many
chemicals of interest to Superfund. It was prepared for Su-
perfund use by the Environmental Criteria and Assessment
Office (ECAO- Gin) in EPA's Office of Health and Environ-
mental Assessment. Chemicals considered are those for
which Health Effects Assessment Documents, Health and
Environmental Effects Profiles, Health Assessment Docu-
ments or Air Quality Criteria Documents have been prepared
by ECAO. Radionuclides considered are those believed to be
most common at Superfund sites. Tables summarize refer-
ence doses (RfDs) for toxicity from subchronic and chronic
inhalation, oral exposure, slope factors and unit risk values
for carcinogenicity based on lifetime inhalation and oral ex-
posure, and radionuclide carcinogenicity.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, De-
posit Account required (Minimum deposit $100 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $200). Single copies also available.
196
-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Risk Management
Issued and superseded quarterly. Supersedes PB91-921100 .
4 issues.
Subject index keywords: Public health, Hazardous materi-
als, Radioactive wastes, Chemical compounds, Superfund
program, Environmental impact assessments, Biological ef-
ifects, Health hazards.
1052 Health Effects Assessment Summary Tables
Order Number PB93-921100CDH, price: Standing Order, call
for price
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC; 1993
The document is an excellent 'pointer' system to identify cur-
rent literature or changes in assessment criteria for many
chemicals of interest to Superfund. It was prepared for Su-
perfund use by the Environmental Criteria and Assessment
Office (ECAO- Cin) in EPA's Office of Health and Environ-
mental Assessment. Chemicals considered are those for
which Health Effects Assessment Documents, Health and
Environmental Effects Profiles, Health Assessment Docu-
ments or Air Quality Criteria Documents have been prepared
by ECAO. Radionuclides considered are those believed to be
most common at Superfund sites. Tables summarize refer-
ence doses (RfDs) for toxicity from subchronic and chronic
inhalation, oral exposure, slope factors and unit risk values
for carcinogenicity based on lifetime inhalation and oral ex-
posure, and radionuclide carcinogenicity.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, De-
posit Account required (Minimum deposit $100 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $200). Single copies also available.
Issued and superseded quarterly. Supersedes PB92-921100 .
4 issues.
Subject index keywords: Public health, Hazardous materi-
als, Radioactive wastes, Chemical compounds, Superfund
program, Environmental impact assessments, Biological ef-
fects, Health hazards.
1053 Health Effects Assessment Summary Tables
Order Number PB94-921100CDH, price: Standing Order, call
for price
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC; 1994
The document is an excellent 'pointer' system to identify cur-
rent literature or changes in assessment criteria for many
chemicals of interest to Superfund. It was prepared for Su-
perfund use by the Environmental Criteria and Assessment
Office (ECAO- Cin) in EPA's Office of Health and Environ-
mental Assessment. Chemicals considered are those for
which Health Effects Assessment Documents, Health and
Environmental Effects Profiles, Health Assessment Docu-
ments or Air Quality Criteria Documents have been prepared
by ECAO. Radionuclides considered are those believed to be
most common at Superfund sites. Tables summarize refer-
ence doses (RfDs) for toxicity from subchronic and chronic
inhalation, oral exposure, slope factors and unit risk values
for carcinogenicity based on lifetime inhalation and oral ex-
posure, and radionuclide carcinogenicity.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, De-
posit Account required (Minimum deposit $100 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $200). Single copies also available.
Issued and superseded quarterly. Supersedes PB93-921100 .
4 issues.
Subject index keywords: Public health, Hazardous materi-
als, Radioactive wastes, Chemical compounds, Superfund
program, Environmental impact assessments, Biological ef-
fects, Health hazards.
1054 Health Effects Assessment Summary Tables Fourth
Quarter FY 1989
Order Number PB90-921100CDH, price: Standing Order, call
for price
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC; Oct 89
The document is an excellent 'pointer' system to identify cur-
rent literature or changes in assessment criteria for many
chemicals of interest to Superfund. It was prepared for Su-
perfund use by the Environmental Criteria and Assessment
Office (ECAO- Cin) in EPA's Office of Health and Environ-
mental Assessment. Chemicals considered are those for
which Health Effects Assessment Documents, Health and
Environmental Effects Profiles, Health Assessment Docu-
ments or Air Quality Criteria Documents have been prepared
by ECAO. Radionuclides considered are those believed to be
most common at Superfund sites. Tables summarize refer-
ence doses (RfDs) for toxicity from subchronic and chronic
inhalation, oral exposure, slope factors and unit risk values
for carcinogenicity based on lifetime inhalation and oral ex-
posure, and radionuclide carcinogenicity.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, De-
posit Account required (Minimum deposit $100 North Ameri-
can Continent; all others $200). Single copies also available.
Issued and superseded quarterly. 1p.
Subject index keywords: Public health, Hazardous materi-
als, Radioactive wastes, Chemical compounds, Superfund
program, Environmental impact assessments, Biological ef-
fects, Health hazards.
1055 Identification of SARA (Superfund Amendments and
Reauthorization Act) Compounds in Adipose Tissue
Order Number PB90-132564CDH, price: PC A07/MF A01
Midwest Research Inst., Kansas City, MO.; Environmental
Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of Toxic
Substances; 31 Aug 89
The National Human Adipose Tissue Survey (NHATS), ad-
ministered by EPA/OTS, is an on-going chemical monitoring
network designed to detect levels and prevalences of toxic
substances in the adipose tissue of the general U.S. popula-
tion. Adipose specimens collected in fiscal year 1982 were
analyzed as composites for volatile and semivolatile organic
compounds via HRGC/MS as part of a previous effort. The
data files were then processed to determine the occurrence
of compounds selected from the Superfund Amendments
and Reauthorization Act (SARA) Title III Toxic Chemical List-
ing, and from the SARA Section 110 CERCLA listing of 100
hazardous substances. A total of 61 volatile and 120 semivo-
latile target compounds were selected for analysis from the
listings based on their predicted suitability to the analytical
method. Application of target compound analysis (TCA) to 46
composited adipose tissue samples resulted in the identifica-
tion of 13 volatile and 19 semivolatile compounds. Frequency
of occurrence data was compiled with respect to three age
groups, four census regions and nine census divisions.
Specifications: Sponsored by Environmental Protection
Agency, Washington, DC. Office of Toxic Substances. 139p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund program, Hazardous
substances, Adipose tissue.
197
-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Risk Management
1056 Implementing the Deputy Administrator's Risk
Characterization Memorandum
Order Number PB93-963317CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 26 May 92
The directive implements the Superfund program recommen-
dations of the Deputy Administrator, dated February 26, 1992
Guidance on Risk Characterization for Risk Managers and
Risk Assessors.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 47p.
Subject index keywords: Waste management, Superfund,
Hazardous materials, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
Response.
1057 Interim Guidance for Soil Ingestion Rates
Order Number PB91-139709CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 27 Jan 89
The directive provides guidance to the Regions on soil inges-
tion rate assumptions recommended for use in developing
exposure scenarios for Superfund-lead and enforcement-lead
site risk assessments. The purpose of the guidance is to en-
hance consistency among Regional risk assessments and
reconrtmend an ingestion rate for soil initiated by Headquar-
ters, the directive supersedes 'Superfund Public Health Eval-
uation Manual,' directive no. 9285.4-01 dated October 1986,
only with reference to soil ingestion rates.
Specifications: See also PB87-183125. 7p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
Hazardous materials, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
Response.
1058 Limited-Use Chemical Protective Clothing for EPA
Superfund Activities
Order Number PB92-143494CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Uttle (Arthur D.), Ina, Cambridge, MA. New York State Coll.
of Human Ecology, Ithaca. Dept. of Design and
Environmental Science.; Environmental Protection Agency,
Cincinnati, OH. Risk Reduction Engineering Lab; Feb 92
Because contractor field personnel complained about the
poor durability and fit of limited-use chemical protective
clothing (CPC) most commonly used at hazardous waste site
operations, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)
initiated a study to: characterize use of CPC; determine prob-
lems, and communicate results in publications and procure-
ment guidelines. Personnel at two Superfund hazardous
waste sites were surveyed about CPC problems. Poor fit of
coveralls and lack of fabric durability resulted in garment fail-
ures, especially in the seat, crotch, and underarms. Some
fabrics were identified that provided improved performance.
The commercial market was surveyed, and commercial fab-
rics for limited-use CPC were identified and obtained. Avail-
able standards and specifications describing size and fit pa-
rameters for limited-use CPC were identified and reviewed
relative to EPA Superfund CPC needs. None of the stand-
ards were found to be fully acceptable. American National
Standards Institute (ANSI) Standard 101-1985, however, pro-
vided a satisfactory baseline for further standards develop-
ment. Problems with CPC were analyzed and suggested
changes to ANSI 101 were developed as a proposed pro-
curement guideline. The information was presented to the In-
dustrial Safety Equipment Association, which developed the
ANSI standard.
Specifications: Prepared in cooperation with New York
State Coll. of Human Ecology, Ithaca. Dept. of Design and
Environmental Science. Sponsored by Environmental Protec-
tion Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk Reduction Engineering Lab.
46p.
Subject index keywords: Protective clothing, Superfund,
Chemical compounds, Hazardous materials, Occupational
safety and protection, Waste disposal.
1059 Meeting Summary: National Advisory Council on
Environmental Policy and Technology (1st).
Subcommittee on Radiation Cleanup Regulation. Held in
Washington, DC. on October 18-19, 1993
Order Number PB94-136678CDH, price: PC A05/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Radiation and Indoor Air; Jan 94
The National Advisory Council for Environmental Policy and
Technology (NACEPT) Subcommittee on Radiation Cleanup
Regulations is a committee chartered under the Federal Ad-
visory Committee Act to provide advice and counsel to the
Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)
on issues associated with the management of environmental
problems. NACEPT initiated this Subcommittee to advise
EPA on the development of a Radiation Cleanup Regulation.
The purpose of the meeting was to convene the NACEPT
Subcommittee, discuss the radiation cleanup regulation rule
making and the Subcommittee's work, provide background
briefings on key issues, and discuss and offer comment to
EPA on those issues. The three key issues EPA is currently
exploring as they begin the development of a draft rule on
radiation cleanup regulations are: questions about cleanup
levels/risk levels; future land use/state and local statutes;
and site-specific public involvement.
Specifications: See also PB94-112349. 79p.
Subject index keywords: Radioactive waste management,
Meetings, Pollution regulations.
1060 Nature and Extent of Ecological Risks at Superfund
Sites and RCRA (Resource Conservation and Recovery
Act) Facilities (Executive Summary Included)
Order Number PB90-137316CDH, price: PC A10/MF A02
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Policy, Planning and Evaluation; Jun 89
The Office of Policy Analysis within EPA has been conduct-
ing a study of the ecological risks posed by Superfund Sites
and RCRA Facilities. In June 1989, OPA completed the first
phase of the study and the report presents the results of
OPA's efforts to characterize the nature and extent of eco-
logical risks at Superfund sites and RCRA facilities. The
report is divided into two main parts: Part I addresses Super-
fund sites and Part II addresses RCRA facilities.
Specifications: 219p.
Subject index keywords: Ecology, Hazardous materials,
Risk.
198
-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Risk Management
1061 New Policy on Performance of Risk Assessments
during Remedial Investigation Feasibility Studies (RI/FS)
Conducted by Potentially Responsible Parties (PRPs)
Order Number PB93-963620CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 1 Sep 93
The memorandum announces EPA's new policy on conduct-
ing risk assessments at Superfund sites where potentially re-
sponsible parties (PRPs) are conducting the remedial investi-
gation/feasibility studies (RI/FS) and the Agency's reasons
for adopting the policy.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 6p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Risk assessment, Haz-
ardous materials.
1062 OSWER Comparative Risk Project. Executive
Summary and Overview
Order Number PB90-272501CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Nov 89
The document discusses the study undertaken by the Office
of Solid Waste and Emergency Response (OSWER) to ex-
plore the comparative risks posed by various waste manage-
ment practices regulated by and/or under OSWER purview.
It describes the study's position as an early step in the larger
strategic planning process, undertaken to gain experience in
performing comparative analysis.
Specifications: 72p.
Subject index keywords: Project management, Research
projects, Waste management, Office of Solid Waste and
Emergency Response, Risk assessment.
1063 Quantifying Effects in Ecological Site Assessments:
Biological and Statistical Considerations
Order Number PB91-129189CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Corvallis Environmental Research Lab., OR.; NSI Technology
Services Corp., Corvallis, OR; 1990
The United States Environmental Protection Agency is re-
sponsible for developing methods to control potentially harm-
ful chemicals entering the environment. The determination of
harm is often based on laboratory toxicity tests of chemicals
using plants and animals. The vast number of toxicity tests of
single chemicals that have been produced to date provide an
extensive data base to help determine potential harm of
chemicals to humans and the environment. At Corvallis, the
authors have been working on various toxicity test methods
and on site characterization/assessment methods for some
time. Slightly more than two years ago, ERL-Corvallis began
to address ways of integrating methods to achieve meaning-
ful ecological assessments of hazardous waste sites. Exam-
ples of research activities in Corvallis are presented.
Specifications: Presented at OPPE Workshop on Statistical
Issues for Superfund, Crystal City, VA., February 1990. Pre-
pared in cooperation with NSI Technology Services Corp.,
Corvallis, OR. 31 p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste dis-
posal, Toxicity, Meetings, Superfund.
1064 Recent Advances in Risk Reduction Engineering
Order Number PB90-129339CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk
Reduction Engineering Lab; 1989 , .
Contemporary environmental legislation such as the Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act of 1980 and the Superfund Amendment and Reau-
thorization Act of 1986 emphasize the reduction of risk of
damage to the environment and human health as the basis
of environmental management. There is a hierarchy of ap-
proaches to risk reduction including source control, reuse
and recycle, treatment and exposure minimization. Recent
examples of these approaches, which were evaluated by the
Risk Reduction Engineering Laboratory, are presented in-
cluding: Superfund innovative technology demonstrations,
waste reduction techniques, protective clothing and an
expert system to assess risk.
Specifications: Presented at Pan Pacific Cooperative Sym-
posium (1st), on Industrialization and Emerging Environmen-
tal Health Issues, Kitakyushu, Japan, October 2-6, 1989. 14p.
Subject index keywords: Public health, Hazardous materi-
als, Risk assessment, Environment management, Waste
management.
1065 Risk Assessment Guidance for Superfund. Volume
1. Human Health Evaluation Manual. Part A
Order Number PB90-155581CDH, price: PC A13/MF A02
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Dec 89
The document is part of a two-manual set entitled 'Risk As-
sessment Guidance for Superfund.' One manual, the 'Envi-
ronmental Evaluation Manual,' provides guidance for ecologi-
cal assessment at Superfund sites; the other, the 'Human
Health Evaluation Manual,' provides guidance for health risk
assessment of these sites. The 'Risk Assessment Guidance
for Superfund' manuals were developed to be used during
the Removal and Remedial Investigation/Feasibility Study
(RI/FS) processes at Superfund sites. The analytical frame-
work and specific methods described in the manuals, howev-
er, may also be applicable to evaluations of hazardous
wastes and hazardous materials for other purposes. The two
manuals in the set have somewhat different target audi-
ences. The 'Environmental Evaluation Manual' primarily ad-
dresses Remedial Project Managers (RPMs and On-Scene
Coordinators (OSCs)), who are responsible for ensuring a
thorough evaluation of potential environmental effects at
sites. The 'Human Health Evaluation Manual' provides for
the risk assessor - Updated procedures and policies, specific
equations and variable values for estimating exposure, and a
hierarchy of toxicity data sources.
Specifications: See also Volume 2, PB90-155599. 290p.
Subject index keywords: Toxicology, Risk assessment, Su-
perfund program.
1066 Risk Assessment Guidance for Superfund. Volume
1. Human Health Evaluation Manual. Part A, April 1990
Order Number PB90-273830CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Apr 90
The fact sheet designed to alert RPMs and other personnel
to (1) new aspects of the Human Health Evaluation Manual
(Part A), (2) the purpose and steps of the baseline risk as-
sessment, and (3) where additional help can be obtained.
199
-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Risk Management
Specifications: See also PB90-155581. 9p.
Subject Index keywords: Hazardous materials, Public
health, Guidelines, Superfund, Office of Solid Waste and
Emergency Response, Waste management, Risk assess-
ment.
1067 Risk Assessment Guidance for Superfund. Volume
1. Human Health Evaluation Manual (Part B)
Order Number PB92-963339CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Dec 91
EPA's Human Health Evaluation Manual, which describes the
process of gathering information and assessing the risk to
human health, and the Environment Evaluation Manual com-
prise a two-volume set called Risk Assessment Guidance for
Superfund (RAGS). The HHEM has three main parts: Part A,
Which discusses the baseline risk assessment, Part B, Devel-
opment of Risk-based Preliminary Remediation Goals, and
Part C, Risk Evaluation of Remedial Alternatives. The fact
sheet is designed to introduce remedial project managers
and other personnel to the information that is available in
RAGS/HHEM Part B on developing risk-based preliminary
remediation goals for chemicals of concern at CERCLA sites.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 7p.
Subject Index keywords: Toxicity, Hazardous materials,
Public health, Pollution control, Superfund, Remediation
goals.
1068 Risk Assessment Guidance for Superfund. Volume
1. Human Health Evaluation Manual (Part B, Development
of Risk-Based Preliminary Remediation Goals)
Order Number PB92-963333CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Dec 91
The document is one of a three-part series. Part B provides
guidance on using USEPA toxicity values and exposure infor-
mation to derive risk-based preliminary remedial goals (PRG)
for a CERCLA site. Initially developed at the scoping phase
using readily available information, risk-based PRGs general-
ly are modified based on site-specific data gathered during
the remedial investigation/feasibility study. The guidance
does not discuss the risk management decisions that are
necessary at a CERCLA site. The potential users of Part B
are those involved in the remedy selection and implementa-
tion process, including risk assessors, risk assessment re-
viewers, remedial project managers, and other decision-
makers.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. See also PB92-963334. 66p.
Subject Index keywords: Hazardous materials, Public
health, Pollution control, Superfund.
1069 Risk Assessment Guidance for Superfund. Volume
1. Human Health Evaluation Manual (Part C)
Order Number PB92-963340CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Dec 91
EPA's Human Health Evaluation Manual, which describes the
process of gathering information and assessing the risk to
human health, and the Environment Evaluation Manual com-
prise a two-volume set called Risk Assessment Guidance for
Superfund (RAGS). The HHEM has three main parts: Part A,
which discusses the baseline risk assessment, Part B, Devel-
opment of Risk-based Preliminary Remediation Goals, and
Part C, Risk Evaluation of Remedial Alternatives. The fact
sheet is designed to introduce remedial project managers
and other personnel to the information that is available in
RAGS/HHEM Part C on using human health risk information
to evaluate remedial alternatives.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 8p.
Subject index keywords: Toxicity, Hazardous materials,
Public health, Pollution control, Superfund, Risk assessment.
1070 Risk Assessment Guidance for Superfund. Volume
1. Human Health Evaluation Manual (Part C, Risk
Evaluation of Remedial Alternatives)
Order Number PB92-963334CDH, price: PC A05/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Dec 91
The document is one of a three-part series. Part C provides
guidance on the human health risk evaluations of remedial
alternatives that are conducted during the feasibility study,
during selection and documentations of a remedy, and during
and after remedy implementation. Part C provides general
guidance to assist in site-specific risk evaluations and to
maintain flexibility in the analysis and decision-making proc-
ess. The potential users of Part C are persons involved in
the remedy selection and implementation process, including
risk assessors, risk assessment reviewers, remedial project
managers, and other decision-makers.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. See also PB92-963333. 77p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Public
health, Pollution control, Superfund.
1071 Risk Assessment Guidance for Superfund. Volume
1. Human Health Evaluation Manual. Supplemental
Guidance: 'Standard Default Exposure Factors'
Order Number PB91-921314CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; 25 Mar 91
The document supplements the Risk Assessment Guidance
for Superfund (RAGS): Human Health Evaluation Manual,
Part A. Where exposure factors presented in the guidance
differ from those in Part A, the values found in the guidance
supersede those in Part A. The guidance was developed to
encourage a consistent approach to characterizing potential
human exposures at Superfund sites. The exposure factors
presented in the document are generally considered most
appropriate for estimating Reasonable Maximum Exposures
(RME), and should be used in baseline risk assessments
unless alternate or site-specific values can be clearly justified
by supporting data.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $150 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $300). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. See also PB90-155581. 28p.
200
-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Risk Management
Subject index keywords: Public health, Humans, Exposure,
Hazardous materials, Superfund, Risk assessment.
1072 Risk Assessment Guidance for Superfund. Volume
2. Environmental Evaluation Manual
Order Number PB90-155599CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Mar 89
The document is part of a two-manual set entitled 'Risk As-
sessment Guidance for Superfund.' One manual, the 'Envi-
ronmental Evaluation Manual,' provides guidance for ecologi-
cal assessment at Superfund sites; the other, the 'Human
, Health Evaluation Manual,' provides guidance for health risk
assessment of these sites. The 'Risk Assessment Guidance
for Superfund' manuals were developed to be used during
the Removal and Remedial investigation/Feasibility Study
(RI/FS) processes at Superfund sites. The analytical frame-
work and specific methods described in the manuals, howev-
er, may also be applicable to evaluations of hazardous
wastes and hazardous materials for other purposes. The two
manuals in the set have somewhat different target audi-
ences. The 'Environmental Evaluation Manual' primarily ad-
dresses Remedial Project Managers (RPMs) and On-Scene
Coordinators (OSCs)), who are responsible for ensuring a
.thorough evaluation of potential environmental effects at
-sites. The 'Environmental Evaluation Manual' is not a de-
tailed 'how-to' type of guidance, and it does not provide
'cookbook' approaches for evaluation.
Specifications: See also Volume 1, PB90-155581. 63p.
Subject index keywords: Ecology, Superfund program, Risk
assessment.
1073 Risk Assessment in Superfund: A Primer. First
Edition, September 1990
Order Number PB91-214197CDH, price: PC A05/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Apr 91
The document is an introduction to risk assessment for Su-
perfund Remedial Project Managers (RPMs) and On-Scene
Coordinators (OSCs). This is an internal training document.
Specifications: 87p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
Hazardous materials, Risk assessment, Office of Solid Waste
and Emergency Response.
1074 Role of Health Research in Support of EPA's
Regulatory Programs
Order Number PB91-211912CDH, price: PC A06/MF A01
Eastern Research Group, Inc., Arlington, MA.; Environmental
Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of Health
Research; Jun 90
The document highlights the ongoing role of environmental
health research in support of the Environmental Protection
Agency's regulatory programs. It summarizes the key legisla-
tion, emphasizing the uses of health research, and identifies
the most important research needs for each program office.
The document shows the key role played by environmental
health research in EPA's regulatory activities and points out
that certain research needs are common across all the pro-
grams.
Specifications: Sponsored by Environmental Protection
Agency, Washington, DC. Office of Health Research. 104p.
Subject index keywords: Health risk, Environmental re-
search, Pollution regulations, Public health.
1075 Role of the Baseline Risk Assessment in Superfund
Remedy Selection Decisions
Order Number PB91-921359CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Apr 91
The objective of the memorandum is to provide further guid-
ance on how to use the baseline risk assessment to make
risk management decisions such as determining whether re-
medial action under CERCLA Sections 104 or 106 is neces-
sary. The memorandum also clarifies the use of the base line
risk assessment in selecting appropriate remedies under
CERCLA Section 121, promotes consistency in preparing
site-specific risk assessments, and helps ensure that appro-
priate documentation from the baseline risk assessment is in-
cluded in Superfund remedy selection documents.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $150 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $300). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 11 p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Risk assess-
ment, Superfund.
1076 Site Assessment: Evaluating Risks at Superfund
Sites
Order Number PB93-963347CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Sep 93
The report includes an overview of the site assessment proc-
ess within the Superfund program and answers commonly
asked questions.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 8p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Hazardous materials,
Waste disposal, Pollution control.
1077 Summary of Ecological Risks, Assessment Methods,
and Risk Management Decisions in Superfund and RCRA
(Resource Conservation and Recovery Act)
Order Number PB90-137340CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Policy, Planning and Evaluation; Jun 89
In developing and implementing programs under the Com-
prehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Li-
ability Act (CERCLA), EPA has focused primarily on analysis
and mitigation of human health risks and less emphasis has
been placed on analysis and mitigation of ecological threats
at Superfund sites. As an initial step in investigating issues
related to ecological threats at Superfund sites, EPA's Office
of Policy Analysis has conducted a study of three broad
topics: (1) the nature and extent of ecological threats at Su-
perfund sites: (2) the ecological assessment methods that
have been used in the Superfund program: and (3) the
extent to which ecological concerns have been used as a
basis for decision making at Superfund sites.
Specifications: 45p.
Subject index keywords: Ecology, Hazardous materials,
Public health.
201
-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: RI/FS & RODS
Process
1078 Supplemental Guidance on Performing Risk
Assessments in Remedial Investigation/Feasibility
Studies (RI/FSs). Conducted by Potentially Responsible
Parties (PRPs)
Order lumber PB91-205526CDH, price: PC A06/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid V/aste and Emergency Response; 1991
The purpose of the directive is to provide additional guidance
on implementing the policy that EPA will not enter into settle-
ment agreements under which PRPs perform the risk assess-
ment components of the RI/FS, as discussed by the Agency
in OSWER Directive No. 9835.15 (August 28, 1990). The
memorandum provides guidance on coordinating the site
characterization tasks and feasibility study prepared by the
PRP wjth the baseline risk assessment performed by EPA.
Specifications: 102p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
Hazardous materials, Risk assessment, Office of Solid Waste
and Emergency Response, Potentially responsible parties.
1079 Supplemental Guidance to RAGS: Calculating the
Concentration Term. Volume 1, Number 1, May 1992
Order Number PB92:963373CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; May 92
The bulletin explains the concentration term in the exposure/
intake equation to remedial project managers, risk assessors,
statisticians, and other personnel. This bulletin presents the
general intake equation as presented in RAGS/HHEM Part
A, discusses basic concepts concerning the concentration
term, describes generally how to calculate the concentration
term, presents examples to illustrate several important
points, and identifies where to get additional help.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 10p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Hazardous materials,
Waste management, Environmental health, Office of Solid
Waste and Emergency Response, Risk Assessment Guid-
ance for Superfund.
1080 Updated Health Effects Assessment for Acetone
Order Number PB90-142373CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH.
Environmental Criteria and Assessment Office.; Syracuse
Research Corp., NY; Apr 88
The report summarizes and evaluates information relevant to
a preliminary interim assessment of adverse health effects
associated with specific chemicals or compounds. The Office
of Emergency and Remedial Response (Superfund) uses
these documents in preparing cost-benefit analyses under
Executive Order 12991 for decision-making under CERCLA.
All estimates of acceptable intakes and carcinogenic potency
presented in the document should be considered as prelimi-
nary and reflect limited resources allocated to the project.
The intent in the assessments is to suggest acceptable ex-
posure levels whenever sufficient data are available. The in-
terim values presented reflect the relative degree of hazard
associated with exposure or risk to the chemical(s) ad-
dressed. Whenever possible, two categories of values have
been estimated for systemic toxicants (toxicants for which
cancer is not the endpoint of concern). The first, RfDS or
subchronic reference dose, is an estimate of an exposure
level that would not be expected to cause adverse effects
when exposure occurs during a limited time interval. The RfD
is an estimate of an exposure level that would not be expect-
ed to cause adverse effects when exposure occurs for a sig-
nificant portion of the lifespan.
Specifications: Prepared in cooperation with Syracuse Re-
search Corp., NY. 32p.
Subject index keywords: Acetone, Hazardous materials, In-
dustrial hygiene, Toxicology, Environmental surveys, Occupa-
tional safety and health, Toxic substances, Environmental
health.
1081 Use of IRIS Values in Superfund Risk Assessment
Order Number PB93-963360CDH, price: PC A01/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; 21 Dec 93
The memorandum clarifies the policy stated at section 7.4.1
of the December 1988 Risk Assessment Guidance for Super-
fund (Volume I) Human Health Evaluation Manual (Part A)
(RAGS) on the use of Integrated Risk Information System
(IRIS) values in performing health risk assessments. Recent
litigation has called attention to the need for all persons in-
volved in the Superfund risk assessment and remedy selec-
tion processes to be fully aware of the role of IRIS values in
those processes.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 3p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Risk assessment,
Toxicology.
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: RI/FS
& RODS Process
1082 Accessing the $50 Million Set-Aside in the Remedial
Action Budget for Quick Response at National Priorities
List Sites
Order Number PB92-963342CDH, price: PC A01/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; 20 Feb 92
The memorandum establishes the procedures required to
access the $50 million that has been set aside from the
FY92 Remedial Action budget for quick response at National
Priorities sites.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 4p.
Subject index keywords: Federal budgets, Hazardous ma-
terials, Directives, Superfund, Remedial action.
1083 Compendium of ROD Language for FY 1993 Focus
Areas
Order Number PB93-963328CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Apr 93
The compendium covers five major areas of focus for
Record of Decision (ROD) language. These include: Ration-
ale for the selected remedy, Clean-up levels, Eco-risk as-
sessment, Applicable or Relevant and Appropriate Require-
202
-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: RI/FS & RODS
Process
ments (ARARs), and Enforcement Activities. Examples of
good documentation of each of the five ROD areas of focus
are presented in the compendium.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 61 p.
Subject index keywords: Waste management, Superfund,
Remedial action, Hazardous materials, Record of Decision.
1084 Conducting Remedial Investigations/Feasibility
Studies for CERCLA Municipal Landfill Sites
Order Number PB91-921205CDH, price: PC A14/MF A02
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Feb 91
The study aids in the development of methodologies and
tools to assist in streamlining the Remedial Investigations/
Feasibility Studies (RI/FS) and selection of remedy process
for landfills. The study: (1) develops tools to assist in scoping
the RI/FS for municipal landfill sites, (2) defines strategies
for characterizing municipal landfill sites that are on the NPL,
and (3) identifying practicable remedial action alternatives for
addressing these types of sites.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $100 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $200). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 307p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste dis-
posal, Earth fills, Municipalities, Superfund.
1085 Cost of Remedial Action Model
Order Number PB93-963304CDH, price: PC A01/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; May 91
The Cost of Remedial Action (CORA) model is a computer-
ized expert advisor used to select remedial actions for Su-
perfund hazardous waste sites and estimate their costs. It
may also be used for RCRA corrective actions. The model is
used for both current site-specific estimates, and for program
budgeting and planning.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $225 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $450). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 4p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste disposal, Haz-
ardous materials, CORA(Cost of Remedial Action).
1086 Cost of Remedial Actions (CORA) Model: Overview
and Applications
Order Number PB93-963318CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Apr 89
The Cost of Remedial Actions (CORA) model estimates site-
specific remedial action costs for hazardous waste sites. The
model is microcomputer-based and has two components: an
expert system to recommend a range of remedial technol-
ogies, and a cost system. The expert system interacts with
the user and develops ranges of recommended remedial
action technologies. The cost system contains algorithms ca-
pable of developing order-of-magnitude cost estimates for 40
demonstrated technologies. The model was used by the U.S.
EPA for the outyear Superfund remedial action budgeting for
FY 1989, FY 1990, and FY 1991 budgeting. The model was
also used to develop U.S. Navy Installation Program budgets
for FY 1989, 1990, and 1991.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $225 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $450). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. Presented at HAZMACON '89,
Santa Clara, CA., April 1989. 11 p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste dis-
posal, Superfund, Cost estimates.
1087 Draft Record of Decision for the Aluminum Smelter
Conservation/Modernization Program
Order Number DE87001323CDH, price: PC A09/MF A01
Bonneville Power Administration, Portland, OR. Div. of
Commercial and Industrial Programs.; Department of Energy,
Washington, DC; May 86
The program would be available for a 2-year period, with an
option for BPA to extend it for 1 additional year. The program
would be available to all ten Northwest primary aluminum
smelters for qualifying projects on a first come, first consid-
ered basis. The total program budget over the 10-year pay-
ment term would be limited to $100 million, with annual
budget expenditures not to exceed $10 million (in 1985 dol-
lars). The incentive would be a direct payment, for a 10-year
term, based on the difference in required kWh/lb of alumi-
num production before and after plant modernization. An in-
centive of 5 mill/saved kWh for plant production efficiency
improvements would be paid to qualifying projects. The alu-
minum companies would propose modernization projects to
BPA. Minimum criteria would be described by BPA in a Re-
quest for Proposals. A reduction in total power entitlement
(contract demand) would be required from the aluminum
companies in return for BPA financial participation. The re-
duction in contract demand would be equal to the reduction
in power requirements resulting from the energy efficiency
improvements. Projects selected by BPA would need to dem-
onstrate actual electric energy electric energy utilization effi-
ciency improvement (reduced kWhs/lb of aluminum produc-
tion) to qualify for BPA incentive payments. Simple curtail-
ment of electric energy use would not qualify. Protecting pro-
prietary information contained in proposals submitted by the
respective companies would be a condition of the conserva-
tion/modernization program. BPA will work together with the
aluminum companies to establish requirements for proprie-
tary information and to develop protective procedures. BPA
would conduct an ongoing evaluation of the conservation/
modernization program and assess the findings on an annual
basis. If the evaluation suggests that programmatic features
should be modified or added to secure additional benefits for
BPA and the region, BPA would initiate changes in the pro-
gram. (ERA citation 12:000688)
Specifications: Portions of this document are illegible in
microfiche products. 178p.
Subject index keywords: Aluminium, Metal Industry, Smelt-
ers.
1088 Feasibility Study: Detailed Analysis of Remedial
Action Alternatives
Order Number PB90-272675CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Mar 90
The document is the fourth and final document in a series of
fact sheets describing the remedial investigation/feasibility
203
-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: RI/FS & RODS
Process
study (RI/FS). The fact sheet is a synopsis of Chapter 6 of
'The Guidance for Conducting Remedial Investigations and
Feasibility Studies Under CERCLA' (Directive No. 9355.3-01)
which addresses the detailed analysis of remedial action al-
ternatives. Additionally, the fact sheet provides Remedial
Project Managers (RPMs) with information on how to
manage this phase of the FS efficiently and effectively.
Specifications: 7p.
Subject Index keywords: Hazardous materials, Superfund,
Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response, Remedial
action, Waste management, Preremedial actions.
1089 Feasibility Study: Development and Screening of
Remedial Action Alternatives
Order Number PB90-274416CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Nov 89
The fact sheet provides a summary of Chapter 4 of the 'In-
terim Final Guidance for Conducting Remedial Investigations
and Feasibility Studies Under CERCLA' which discusses the
development and screening of alternatives for Remedial
Action. The fact sheet also provides information intended to
assist the Remedial Project Manager in managing this por-
tion of the Feasibility Study efficiently and effectively.
Specifications: See also PB90-272675. 7p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Superfund,
Waste management, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
Response, Remedial action.
1090 final Policy on Setting RI/FS Priorities
Order Number PB91-921324CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; 27 Dec 90
The directive summarizes the final policy on setting RI/FS
prioritization. The policy's goal is to demonstrate Super-fund's
compliance with the Worst Problems First Policy at the earli-
est stage of the remedial process. It outlines the specific ob-
jectives and goals of the new policy and offers guidance to
the regions on how best to implement the policy.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $150 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $300). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 10p.
Subject Index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
Hazardous materials, Remedial action, Office of Solid Waste
and Emergency Response.
1091 FY 1992 Themes for Regional Coordination to
Support Continuous Improvements of Superfund's
Remedial Program
Order Number PB92-963368CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Dec 91
The directive outlines the FY 92 themes for regional coordi-
nation to support continuous improvements of Superfund's
remedial program. Themes represent critical program areas
that require special emphasis by Regional management,
staff, and Regional Coordinators. This effort will improve the
efficiency and quality of the Superfund program which fur-
thers their commitment to Total Quality Management. Re-
gional Coordinators will promote guidance awareness and
national consistency!
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 6p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
Hazardous materials, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
Response.
1092 Getting Ready: Scoping the RI/FS
Order Number PB90-274390CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Nov 89
The fact sheet summarizes Chapter Two of 'Interim Final
Guidance for Conducting Remedial Investigations and Feasi-
bility Studies Under CERCLA.' The Fact Sheet also provides
information on how to manage the scoping phase of the Rl/
FS process.
Specifications: 9p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Project
management, Superfund, Waste management, Office of Solid
Waste and Emergency Response, Remedial action.
1093 Guidance on Implementation of the 'Contribute to
Remedial Performance' Provision
Order Number PB93-963413CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Apr 87
The provision promotes the performance of removal actions
that address threats more efficiently by considering the over-
all site cleanup before the start of the action. To the maxi-
mum extent practicable, removal actions should be desigend
to avoid wasteful, repetitive, short-term actions that do not
contribute to the efficient, cost-effective performance of long-
term remedial actions to be taken by the EPA, State, or other
party. The major objective of this requirement is to provide
maximum protection of public health and the environment at
minimal cost by avoidance of removal restarts. The focus of
this provision is on avoidance of restarts that are due to re-
curring threats that were not adequately abated in the origi-
nal removal action, and threats from deteriorating site condi-
tions that should have been foreseen.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $225 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $450). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 6p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Hazardous materials,
Waste disposal, Remedial action.
1094 Guidance on Oversight of Potentially Responsible
Party Remedial Investigations and Feasibility Studies.
Volume 1
Order Number PB91-228361CDH, price: PC A07/MF A02
PRC Environmental Management, inc., McLean, VA.;
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Jun 91
Volume 1 of the document addresses oversight of remedial
investigations and feasibility studies (RI/FSs) conducted by
potentially responsible parties (PRPs) at enforcement-lead
sites addressed under the Comprehensive Environmental
Response, Compensation and Liability Act, as amended
(CERCLA). It parallels activities described in the 'Guidance
for Conducting Remedial Investigations and Feasibility Stud-
ies Under CERCLA' (OSWER Directive No. 9355.3-01, Octo-
204
llUliiiiHlll
I A,
-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Rl/FS & RODS
Process
ber, 1988, referred to here as the 'RI/FS Guidance') and the
'Model Statement of Work for a Remedial Investigation and
Feasibility Study Conducted by Potentially Responsible Par-
ties' (OSWER Directive No. 9835.8, June 2, 1989, referred to
here as the 'Model SOW for PRP-lead RI/FSs'). It provides
project managers with the procedures required to organize
and perform appropriate oversight duties and responsibilities.
The document is guidance only; it is not a binding set of re-
quirements and does not create rights for any party.
Specifications: Also pub. as OSWER DIRECTIVE-
9835.1 (C). See also Volume 2, PB91-228379. Sponsored by
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response. 127p.
Subject index keywords: Remedial action, Hazardous ma-
terials, Waste management, Superfund, Potentially responsi-
ble parties, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response.
1095 Guidance on Oversight of Potentially Responsible
Party Remedial Investigations and Feasibility Studies.
Volume 2. Appendices
Order Number PB91-228379CDH, price: PC A09/MF A03
PRC Environmental Management, Inc., McLean, VA.;
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Jun 91
Volume 2 of the document describes the oversight of sam-
pling and analysis activities (Appendix B1) and of well drilling
and installation activity (Appendix C1) conducted during a
Remedial Investigation (Rl) by potentially responsible parties
(PRPs) at Enforcement-lead sites addressed under the Com-
prehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Li-
ability Act, as amended (CERCLA). Checklists to assist in the
documentation of sampling and analysis activities are con-
tained in Appendix B2 while documentation of well drilling
and installation activities are contained in Appendix C2. The
information presented in Volume 2 is consistent with the ref-
erences listed at the end of Appendices B and C.
Specifications: Also pub. as OSWER DIRECTIVE-
9835.1(D). See also Volume 1, PB91-228361. Sponsored by
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response. 196p.
Subject index keywords: Remedial action, Hazardous ma-
terials, Waste management, Superfund, Potentially responsi-
ble parties, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response.
1096 Guide to Addressing Pre-ROD and Post-ROD
Changes
Order Number PB91-921351CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Apr 91
The Fact Sheet outlines the methods of categorizing pre-
and post-ROD changes and the ways in which changes
should be documented. More detailed guidance for pre-ROD
changes and both significant and fundamental post-ROD
changes can be found in chapters 5 and 8, respectively, of
the Interim Final Guidance on Preparing Superfund Decision
Documents (OSWER Directive 9355.3-02).
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $150 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $300). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 7p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
Hazardous materials, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
Response.
1097 Guide to Developing Action Memorandums
Order Number PB91-921317CDH, price: PC A01/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Dec 90
The fact sheet describes the essential components of Action
memorandums used to initiate a removal action, as well as
special cases like enforcement-lead removals and special
circumstances such as actions that require additional funds,
a change in the scope of response, or an exemption to the
statutory limits under section 104(c) of CERCLA. EPA pre-
pares Action Memos for all Fund-lead removal actions.
Action Memos describe a site's history, current activities,
health and environmental threats, and proposed actions and
costs.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $150 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $300). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 5p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Hazardous materials,
Waste management, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
Response.
1098 Guide to Developing Superfund No Action, Interim
Action, and Contingency Remedy RODs
Order Number PB91-921350CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Apr 91
The guide provides quick reference to the essential compo-
nents of Records of Decision (RODs) that are prepared to
document three specific types of remedial action decisions:
(1) no action; (2) interim actions; and (3) contingency reme-
dies. In preparing one of these three types of RODs, Reme-
dial Project Managers (RPMs) should modify the format of
the 'standard ROD' for final response actions as indicated in
the guide.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $150 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $300). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. Available separately or as part of
PB91-921265. 7p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
Hazardous materials, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
Response, Record of Decision.
1099 Guide to Developing Superfund Proposed Plans
Order Number PB90-273855CDH, price: PC A01/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Nov 89
The fact sheet outlines the major components of the Super-
fund Proposed Plan and suggests effective ways in which the
various sections can be presented.
Specifications: 6p.
Subject index keywords: Guidelines, Hazardous materials,
Superfund, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response,
Waste management.
1100 Guide to Selecting Superfund Remedial Actions
Order Number PB90-273863CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Apr 90
The fact sheet describes the statutory requirements for
CERCLA remedies at hazardous waste sites and the process
EPA has established in the 1990 revised National Contingen-
205
-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: RI/FS & RODS
Process
cy Plan (NCP) for meeting those requirements. This process
is a general framework for reaching a judgement as to the
most appropriate method of achieving protection of human
health and the environment at a particular site.
Specifications: 9p.
Subject Index keywords: Guidelines, Hazardous materials,
Superfund, Remedial action, Waste management, Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response.
1101 Management Systems Review of the Superfund Rl/
FS: Opportunities for Streamlining
Ordeir Number PB90-264136CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Research Triangle Inst, Research Triangle Park, NC.;
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Quality
Assurance Management Staff; c1990
The Management Systems Review (MSR) is an important
component of EPA's quality assurance program to assess
the effectiveness of environmental data operations and the
quality assurance/quality control activities designed to sup-
port those operations. MSRs inform managers about aspects
of the environmental data operation that are working well
and those which may warrant some improvement. A recent
review of the Superfund remedial investigation/feasibility
study (RI/FS) has shown that the MSR is an excellent tool
for providing a systematic definition of complex environmen-
tal data operations and for enabling a thorough analysis of
these operations. The MSR utilized information gathered
from interviews of Regional personnel and from case studies
of recently completed Rl/FSs. The findings indicated that en-
vironmental data play an important role in most RI/FS deci-
sions and that thorough and structured scoping is critical to
the effectiveness of the RI/FS. Analysis of the RI/FS proc-
ess Using a comprehensive flow diagram identified several
opportunities for changes that may increase efficiency in
data collection and the reliability of RI/FS decisions. These
changes provide for more effective scoping activities, a
streamlined feasibility study, and increased use of treatability
studies during the Rl. A pilot demonstration of these process
changes is being planned for a Regional RI/FS. (Copyright
(c) 1990-Air and Waste Management Association.)
Specifications: Pub. in Jnl. of the Air and Work Manage-
ment Association, v40 n5 p753-737 May 90. Sponsored by
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Quality
Assurance Management Staff. 7p.
Subject index keywords: Waste management, Superfund,
Remedial action.
1102 Performance of Risk Assessments in Remedial
Investigation/Feasibility Studies (Rl/FSs) Conducted by
Potentially Responsible Parties (PRPs)
Order Number PB91-139493CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 28 Aug 90
The purpose of the directive is to provide initial guidance on
implementing the recent decision that in the future EPA will
develop all risk assessments for sites remediated under
CERGLA. It focuses on the applicability of the decision to
new and existing orders or decrees for Rl/FSs conducted by
PRPs.,In essence, EPA or a State (whose oversight of the
PRP is Federally funded) will develop the risk assessment for
all new orders or decrees. For existing orders or decrees
that specify that the PRP prepares the risk assessment, the
PRP will be given an opportunity under the terms of the
order or decree to complete an acceptable risk assessment
under stringent oversight and without undue delay. The term
'risk assessment' in the directive is meant to include environ-
mental assessments as well as assessments of risks to
human health.
Specifications: 8p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
Hazardous materials, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
Response.
1103 Presumptive Remedies: Policy and Procedures
Order Number PB93-963345CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Sep 93
The objective of the presumptive remedies initiative is to use
the program's past experience to streamline site investiga-
tions and speed up selection of cleanup actions. Over time
presumptive remedies are expected to ensure consistency in
remedy selection and reduce the cost and time required to
clean up similar types of sites. Presumptive remedies are ex-
pected to be used at all appropriate sites except under un-
usual site-specific circumstances. EPA plans to develop a
series of directives on presumptive remedies for various
types of sites. The directive serves as an overall guide to the
presumptive remedies initiative and its effect on site cleanup.
Through a question and answer format, it explains, in general
terms, ways in which presumptive remedies will streamline or
change the remedial and removal processes from the con-
ventional processes and how certain Superfund policies will
be affected by the initiative.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 8p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Government policies,
Administrative procedures.
1104 Presumptive Remedies: Site Characterization and
Technology Selection for CERCLA Sites with Volatile
Organic Compounds in Soils
Order Number PB93-963346CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Sep 93
Presumptive remedies are preferred technologies for
common categories of sites, based on historical patterns of
remedy selection and EPA's scientific and engineering eval-
uation of performance data on technology implementation.
The directive identifies the presumptive remedies for Com-
prehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Li-
ability Act (CERCLA) sites with soils contaminated by volatile
organic compounds (VOCs). Soil vapor extraction (SVE),
thermal desorption, and incineration are the presumptive
remedies for Superfund sites with VOC-contaminated soil as-
suming the site characteristics meet certain criteria.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 26p.
Subject index keywords: Site characterization, Technology
assessment, Soil contamination, Superfund.
206
-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION; RI/FS & RODS
Process
1105 Presumptive Remedy for CERCLA Municipal Landfill
Sites
Order Number PB93-963339CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Sep 93
The directive establishes containment as the presumptive
remedy for CERCLA municipal landfills. The framework for
the presumptive remedy for these sites is presented in a
streamlining manual entitled Conducting Remedial Investiga-
tions/Feasibility Studies for CERCLA Municipal Landfill Sites,
February 1991 (OSWER Directive 9355. 3-11). The directive
highlights and emphasizes the importance of certain stream-
lining principles related to the scoping (planning) stages of
the remedial investigation/feasibility study (RI/FS) that were
identified in the manual. The directive also provides clarifica-
tion of and additional guidance in the following areas: (1) the
level of detail appropriate for risk assessment of source
areas at municipal landfills and (2) the characterization of hot
spots.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 15p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Landfills, Remediation.
1106 Remedial Investigation: Site Characterization and
Treatability Studies
Order Number PB90-274408CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Nov 89
The fact sheet summarizes Chapters 3 and 5 of the 'Interim
Final Guidance for Conducting Remedial Investigations and
Feasibility Studies Under CERCLA.' The document also dis-
cusses site characteristics and treatability studies, and in-
cludes information on how to manage these aspects of the
Rl.
Specifications: 7p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste treat-
ment, Superfund, Waste management, Office of Solid Waste
and Emergency Response, Remedial action.
1107 Revisions to OMB Circular A-94 on Guidelines and
Discount Rates for Benefit-Cost Analysis
Order Number PB93-963297CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; 25 Jun 93
The memorandum revises the discount rate used in cost esti-
mation for Superfund activities to 7%. This discount rate
should be used in estimating the present worth value for po-
tential alternatives in the remedial investigation/feasibility
study and for remedial actions.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $225 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $450). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. See also PB89-184626. 31 p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Hazardous materials,
Waste disposal, Interest rate.
1108 RI/FS Improvements
Order Number PB90-272642CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; 23 Jul 87
The directive identifies methods of reducing overall project
schedules and costs while retaining a quality product. Four
major points are included: phased Remedial Investigations/
Feasibility Studies (RI/FS), streamlined project planning,
management of handoffs, and Remedial Investigation/Feasi-
bility Study (RI/FS) control reviews.
Specifications: 14p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Office of Solid Waste
and Emergency Response.
1109 RI/FS Improvements Follow-Up
Order Number PB90-249657CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; 25 Apr 88
The reports directive delineates improvements developed for
more effective Remedial Investigations/Feasibility Studies
(RI/FS).
Specifications: 18p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Project
management, Superfund, Remedial investigations.
1110 RI/FS Streamlining
Order Number PB91-214981CDH, price:-PC A04/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 14 Feb 89
The directive presents a second set of recommendations for
streamlining measures that will reduce the cost and duration
of RI/FS's. Recommendations include those related to tech-
nical issues, procurement enhancement, program manage-
ment, State coordination and enforcement.
Specifications: 51 p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
Hazardous materials, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
Response.
1111 ROD Annual Report, FY 1989
Order Number PB90-258484CDH, price: PC A17/MF A02
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Apr 90
Provides the Regions and Headquarters with summary data
on FY 89 Records of Decision (RODs), and consists of the
following sections: Introduction - highlights specific accom-
plishments in the ROD process; ROD Summaries ~ de-
scribes site conditions and key contaminants, selected reme-
dial actions, specific remedy performance standards and
goals, and institutional controls for each FY 89 ROD; FY 89
ROD Summary Table - summarizes. all remedial actions,
capital operation and maintenance costs, and contaminated
media; FY 82-FY 88 ROD Summary Table - summarizes all
RODs from FY 82 through FY 88; ROD Keyword List ~ pro-
vides major keyword categories and their subcategories for
all RODs approved to date. '
Specifications: See also report for FY88, PB89-235212.
379p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste dis-
posal, Waste treatment, Superfund, Remedial action, Record
of decision.
1112 ROD Annual Report, FY 1990
Order Number PB91-921277CDH, price: PC A24/MF A03
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Jul 91
The report presents the Regional arid Headquarters staff
with summary data on RODs. The report features specific ac-
complishments in the ROD process and summarizes the
207
-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: RI/FS & RODS
Process
year's RODs by describing site conditions and key contami-
nants, selected remedial actions, specific remedy perform-
ance standards and goals, and institutional controls.
Specifications: Pager copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. See also PB90-258484. 557p.
Subject Index keywords: Groundwater, Hazardous materi-
als, Waste disposal, Superfund.
1113 ROD Annual Report, FY1991. Volume 1
Order Number PB92-963359CDH, price: PC$77.00
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Apr 92
The ROD Annual Report FY 1991 is a reference publication
designed to provide Headquarters, Regions, and the public
with summary information on Superfund RODs. RODs docu-
ment the remedy decision for a site or operable unit. RODs
certify that the remedy selection process followed require-
ments of CERCLA, and discuss the major technical compo-
nents of the remedy. Volume 1 highlights specific information
about the RODs signed during FY 1991. It includes exhibits
of the types of RODs, treatment vs. containment remedies,
treatment technologies used for remedies, treatment trains,
and estimates for remedy costs. ROD abstracts and a list of
RODs signed in FY 1991 describe site history, key contami-
nants, the selected remedial action, performance standards,
institutional controls, and estimated cost for each remedy.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. See also Volume 2, PB92-963360
andPB91-921277. 652p.
Subject Index keywords: Ground water, Hazardous materi-
als, Waste disposal, Superfund.
1114 ROD Annual Report, FY1991. Volume 2
Order Number PB92-963360CDH, price: PC A18/MF A04
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Apr 92
The ROD Annual Report FY 1991 is a reference publication
designed to provide Headquarters, Regions, and the public
with summary information on Superfund RODs. This year the
report is in two volumes. Volume 2 contains the FY 1982 -
1990 ROD Summary Table which lists the remedial action
site name and date of ROD signature, and summarizes the
threat or problem, waste volume components of the selected
remedy, cleanup goals, and estimated costs for each FY
1982 - 1990 ROD. Volume 2 also contains a list of RODs
signed to date, a keyword list for all FY 1982 -1990 RODs, a
list of ROD Amendments, and a list of ROD Explanations of
Significant Differences.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. See also Volume 1, PB92-963359
and PB91-921277. 406p.
Subject Index keywords: Ground water, Hazardous materi-
als. Waste disposal, Superfund, Record of Decision.
1115 ROD Annual Report, FY 1992
Order Number PB93-963349CDH, price: PC A22/MF A04
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Dec 93
The Records of Decision (RODs) highlighted in the annual
report document compliance with SARA mandates for the re-
medial program in FY 1992. One hundred sixty-four (164)
RODs and eight (8) ROD Amendments, including Fund-lead,
Enforcement, and Federal Facility RODs were signed during
FY 1992. The lead breakdown for the RODs is as follows: 53
Fund-lead plus 65 Enforcement-lead, equals 118; 118 plus
46 Federal Facility-lead equals 164 RODs. The eight Amend-
ments consist of 3 Fund-lead and 5 Enforcement-lead RODs.
119 of the 172 RQDs addressed source control remediation,
and 28 RODs addressed ground-water-only remediation. The
remaining 25 RODs were no action/no further action reme-
dies. Of the total 119 source control RODs, 85 addressed a
final source control remedy, and 34 addressed an interim
source control remedy. 78 of the 119 source control RODs
selected both source control and ground water remediation
components.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. See also PB92-963359 and PB92-
963360. 516p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Remedial action, Haz-
ardous materials, Record of Decision.
1116 Role of Expedited Response Actions under SARA
Order Number PB91-214221CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; 21 Apr 87
The directive serves as a follow-up to OSWER Directive
9360.0-10 (July 8, 1986) entitled 'Expedited Response Ac-
tions,' and updates the basic tenets of expedited response
actions (ERAs) and their role in the Superfund Remedial Pro-
gram.
Specifications: Portions of this document are not fully legi-
ble. 13p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
Hazardous materials, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
Response.
1117 Scoper's Notes: An RI/FS Costing Guide. Bringing in
a Quality RI/FS on Time and Within Budget
Order Number PB90-258369CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Feb 90
The guide outlines the tasks and sub-tasks typically conduct-
ed as part of a Remedial Investigation/Feasibility Study (Rl/
FS), and presents a strate gy based on site complexity and
task difficulty for estimating a project's cost. It provides cost
guidelines which can be used to estimate funding needs in
advance of issuing work assignments and evaluating con-
tractor proposals.
Specifications: 29p.
Subject index keywords: Guidelines, Cost estimates, Re-
medial action, Superfund, Waste management.
208
-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: R1VBA
1118 Streamlining the RI/FS for CERCLA Municipal
Landfill Sites
Order Number PB90-274424CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 90
The fact sheet discusses streamlining the RI/FS for munici-
pal landfills with respect to site characterization, risk assess-
ment, and the development of remedial action alternatives.
Streamlining is possible since approximately 20% of the sites
on the NPL are municipal landfills which typically share simi-
lar characteristics.
Specifications: 7p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Earth fills
Superfund, Waste management, Office of Solid Waste and
Emergency Response, Remedial action.
1119 Streamlining the RI/FS for CERCLA Municipal
Landfill Sites
Order Number PB91-921301CDH, price: PC A01/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 90
Approximately 20 percent of the sites on the National Prior-
ities List (NPL) are municipal landfills which typically share
similar characteristics. Because of the similarity the Super-
fund Program anticipates that their remediation will involve
similar waste management approaches. As stated in the Na-
tional Contingency Plan, EPA expects that containment tech-
nologies will generally be appropriate for waste that poses a
relatively low long-term threat or where treatment is impracti-
cable (Sec. 300.430(a)(1)(iii)(B),55FR8846(March 8, 1990)).
In addition, EPA expects treatment to be considered for iden-
tifiable areas of highly toxic and/or mobile material that con-
stitute the principal threat(s) posed by the site (Sec
300.430(a)(1)(iii)(A)). The similarity in landfill characteristics
and the NCP expectations make it possible to streamline the
RI/FS for municipal landfills with respect to site characteriza-
tion, risk assessment, and the development of remedial
action alternatives. The fact sheet outlines available stream-
lining techniques for each of these three phases of an Rl/
FS. Additional information, including tools to assist in scoping
activities, will be included in the document Conducting Re-
medial Investigations/Feasibility Studies for CERCLA Munici-
pal Landfill Sites (November 1990, Directive No. 9355.3-11).
The document will be available from the Center for Environ-
mental Research Information (FTS 684-7562 or 513-569-
7562).
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $150 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $300). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 5p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
Remedial action, Municipal wastes, Earth fills, Office of Solid
Waste and Emergency Response, Comprehensive Environ-
mental Response Compensation and Liability Act.
1120 Structure and Components of Five-Year Reviews
Order Number PB91-921368CDH, price: PC A01/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Aug 91
The fact sheet provides guidance for planning and conduct-
ing five-year reviews. These include: initiation and termination
of reviews; responsibilities and funding; content; and docu-
menting results of reviews. The goal of this fact sheet is to
help assure that reviews are implemented in a consistent
manner nationally, with appropriate consideration of local
concerns and widely varying site conditions.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $150 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $300). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 3p.
Subject index keywords: Waste disposal, Hazardous mate-
rials, Superfund.
1121 Structure and Components of Five-Year Reviews
Order Number PB91-921369CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; May 91
The directive provides guidance primarily on the implementa-
tion of five-year reviews and the issues associated with im-
plementation. These include: triggering points for reviews, re-
sponsibilities and funding, content, and results of reviews.
The goal of this directive is to assure that reviews are imple-
mented in a consistent manner nationally, with appropriate
consideration of local concerns and widely varying site condi-
tions.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $150 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $300). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 16p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste dis-
posal, Superfund.
1122 Technology Selection Guide for Wood Treater Sites
Order Number PB93-963329CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 26 May 93
The purpose of the memorandum is to transmit the Technol-
ogy Selection Guide for Wood Treater Sites. The fact sheet
is part of a series of guidance documents being developed
on presumptive remedies at various categories of sites. The
technology selection guide provides information on specific
technologies and performance data. The information includes
a procedural outline, practical considerations, and treatment
technology tables for sludge, soil, sediment, and ground and
surface water.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 10p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Wood preservatives,
Waste disposal, Pollution control.
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: RD/
RA
1123 Cost Estimating Systems for Remedial Action
Projects
Order Number PB91-231191CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk
Reduction Engineering Lab.; Corps of Engineers, Omaha,
NE. Missouri River Div; 1991
The paper details the ongoing collaboration between the
U.S. EPA and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers in the devel-
opment of complementary microcomputer based cost esti-
mating systems for hazardous waste remediations. The U.S.
209
-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: RD/RA
EPA system, 'Remedial Action Cost Estimating System'
(RACES), is a technology based application. Estimates gen-
erated by RACES are based upon cost engineering relation-
ships, the estimates are designed for use in the early stages
of remediation design. The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
system, 'Micro-Computer Aided Cost Engineering System'
(M-CACES), is a 'bottoms-up' system for use in situations
, where detailed design information is available. While both
systems will stand alone, they have been designed to allow
the transfer of estimates generated by RACES directly into
the M-CACES system.
Specifications: Prepared in cooperation with Corps of Engi-
neers, Omaha, NE. Missouri River Div. 6p.
Subject Index keywords: Remedial action, Cost estimates,
Hazardous materials, Waste management, Superfund, Reme-
dial Action Cost Estimating System, Micro-Computer Aided
Cost Engineering System.
1124 EPA Oversight of Remedial Designs and Remedial
Actions performed by PRPs
Order Number PB91-921357CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Feb 90
The Fact Sheet presents an overview of EPA's guidance for
oversight of enforcement lead projects in which a Potentially
Responsible Party (PRP) conducts the Remedial Design (RD)
and Remedial Action (RA). PRP oversight is to ensure that
selected remedies are protective of public health and the en-
vironment and are in compliance with the Settlement Agree-
merit. For further information, refer to Interim Final Guidance
on EPA Oversight of Remedial Designs and Remedial Ac-
tions Performed by Potentially Responsible Parties, OSWER
Directive 9355.5-Q1, February 1990.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $150 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $300). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 8p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
Hazardous materials, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
Response.
1125 EPA/U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Payment
Process, Direct Cite/Revised Reimbursement Methods
Order Number PB91-921347CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; 21 Mar 90
The directive transmits new procedures for the disbursement
of funds to the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USAGE) under
EPA lead Superfund projects.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order," de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $150 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $300). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 7p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
Hazardous materials, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
Response.
1126 EPA/USACE Payment Process: Direct Cite/Revised
Reimbursement Methods
Order Number PB90-273897CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; May 90
The fact sheet announces a new procedure for paying the
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers for their Superfund related ac-
tivities. It describes the current procedure and outlines the
changes the Office of Emergency and Remedial Response,
Office of the Comptroller, Office of Administration and
USAGE are implementing.
Specifications: 7p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Salary ad-
ministration, Superfund, Office of Solid Waste and Emergen-
cy Response, Army Corps of Engineers, Waste management,
Reimbursements.
1127 Expediting Remedial Construction
Order Number PB90-272683CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Oct 89
The fact sheet examines activities to be considered in Reme-
dial Management Strategies to accelerate remedial construc-
tion.
Specifications: 9p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Construction
management, Superfund, Remedial action, Preremedial
action, Waste management, Office of Solid Waste and Emer-
gency Response.
1128 Guidance on EPA Oversight of Remedial Designs
and Remedial Actions Performed by Potentially
Responsible Parties
Order Number PB90-226069CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Apr 90
The Interim Final Guidance on EPA Oversight of Remedial
Designs and Remedial Actions Performed by Potentially Re-
sponsible Parties was issued in order to ensure that selected
remedies being conducted are protective of public health and
the environment, and that the Remedial Actions are in com-
pliance with the applicable performance standards. It pro-
vides guidance for oversight when EPA is the lead agency
on a project in which a Potentially Responsible Party con-
ducts the Remedial Design and Remedial Action. The guid-
ance does hot cover projects when the Remedial Design and
Remedial Action is performed with Superfund monies in
which the EPA or the State is the lead agency. This will be
the subject of future guidance documents.
Specifications: 56p.
Subject index keywords: Guidelines, Hazardous materials,
Project management, Remedial action, Cleanup operations,
Superfund.
1129 Guidance on Expediting Remedial Design and
Remedial Action
Order Number PB90-273871CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Aug 90
This document examines ways to expedite remedial design
and remedial action so that cleanup activities can be com-
pleted more quickly. Intended for use by remedial project
managers, remedial design contractors, and others involved
in planning remediation activities. It should be used as a
means to evaluate whether a project is suited for expediting
and to determine the methods that could be used.
Specifications: 57p.
Subject index keywords: Guidelines, Hazardous materials,
Superfund, Remedial designs, Remedial action, Waste man-
agement.
210
-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: RD7RA
1130 Guidance on Oversight of PRP Performed RD/RA
Order Number PB90-249707CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; 14 Feb 90
The directive provides interim final guidance on EPA over-
sight of Remedial Designs (RD) and Remedial Actions (RA)
performed by Potentially Responsible Parties (PRP). Insures
that remedies being conducted by PRPs are protective of the
public health and environment, and are in compliance with
applicable performance standards.
Specifications: 56p.
Subject index keywords: Regulations, Supervision, Guid-
ance, Superfund, Remedial action, Office of Solid Waste and
Emergency Response, Remedial designs, Potentially respon-
sible parties.
1131 Procedure for Use of USAGE Preplaced Contracts
to Expedite Superfund Cleanup Tasks
Order Number PB94-963243CDH, price: Standing Order call
for price
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Apr 94
The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USAGE) has procured
preplaced indefinite delivery contracts to provide the EPA
with streamlined, flexible access to engineering, removal,
and remedial services at selected Superfund sites. The docu-
ment describes each contract in terms of scope, applicability,
criteria for use, response time, and procedures for accessing
the contract;
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy and microfiche. 4p.
Subject index keywords: Corps of Engineers, Superfund,
Contract management.
1132 Procuring Innovative Technologies at Remedial
Sites: Q's and A's and Case Studies
Order Number PB92-232388CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Apr 92
The fact sheet is designed to assist EPA Remedial Project
Managers (RPMs) and Contracting Officers (CDs) with the
procurement of innovative treatment technologies. RPMs,
COs, and U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (COE) personnel
were interviewed to obtain information on their experiences
in procuring innovative technologies. EPA's Technology Inno-
vation Office (TlO)has documented case histories of exper-
ences with acquiring innovative technologies in the Super-
fund program. Remedial sites chosen for inclusion in the
review were Fund-lead sites that had started or completed
the procurement of an innovative technology, including biore-
mediation, thermal desorption, vacuum extraction, chemical
treatment, chemical extraction, and in situ soil flushing. The
results of these interviews are presented in a question and
answer format In addition, specific detailed information on
each site is presented in tabular form.
Specifications: 24p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste treat-
ment, Superfund.
1133 Real Estate Acquisition Procedures for USAGE
Projects
Order Number PB91 -921355CDH, price: PC A01 /MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Feb 90
The USACE, because of extensive experience in real estate
activities is an appropriate supporting agency for Superfund
cleanup when a health based relocation is not required. EPA
is authorized to acquire by purchase, lease, donation, con-
demnation, or otherwise any real property needed to conduct
a remedial action. The fact sheet addresses the areas of ini-
tial planning, request and approval process, acquisition, sum-
mary of the major roles and responsibilities, and the timeta-
ble for 104(j) acquisitions. The role of the Remedial Project
Manager (RPMs) is discussed.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $150 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $300). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 5p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
Hazardous materials, Real estate, Office of Solid Waste and
Emergency Response.
1134 Remedial Action Report: Documentation for
Operable Unit Completion
Order Number PB92-963364CDH, price: PC A01/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Jun 92
The progress in moving a site toward the ultimate goal of de-
letion from the NPL typically involves several operable units
or multiple phases of construction over a period of several
years. The purpose of the Remedial Action Report is to doc-
ument the activities that occur under each specific remedial
action operable unit at a site. The report provides documen-
tation that a particular operable unit has met its objectives as
well as summary information for subsequent inclusion in the
Superfund Site Close Out Report. It also serves as a source
of lessons learned for project managers and designers of
future remedial action projects.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 4p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
Hazardous materials, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
Response.
1135 Remedial Action, Treatment, and Disposal of
Hazardous Waste. Proceedings of the Annual Hazardous
Waste Research Symposium (17th). Held in Cincinnati,
Ohio on April 9-11, 1991
Order Number PB91-233627CDH, price: PC$84.00
JACA Corp., Fort Washington, PA.; Science Applications
International Corp., Cincinnati, OH.*Environmental Protection
Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk Reduction Engineering Lab; Apr
y i
The Seventeenth Annual RREL Research Symposium on Re-
medial Action, Treatment and Disposal of Hazardous Waste
was held in Cincinnati, Ohio, April 9-11, 1991. The purpose
of the Symposium was to present the latest significant re-
search findings from ongoing and recently completed
projects funded by the Risk Reduction Engineering Laborato-
ry (RREL). These Proceedings are organized in three sec-
211
-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: RD/RA
tions: Sessions A and B consist of paper presentations. Ses-
sion C contains the poster abstracts. Subjects include reme-
dial action treatment and control technologies for waste dis-
posal, landfill liner and cover systems, underground storage
tanks, and demonstration and development of innovative/al-
ternative treatment technologies for hazardous waste. Alter-
native technology subjects include thermal destruction of
hazardous wastes, field evaluations, existing treatment op-
tions, emerging treatment processes, waste minimization,
and biosystems for hazardous waste destruction.
Specifications: See also PB91-148379. Prepared in coop-
eration with Science Applications International Corp., Cincin-
nati, OH. Sponsored by Environmental Protection Agency,
Cincinnati, OH. Risk Reduction Engineering Lab. 708p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste treat-
ment, Waste disposal, Remedial action, Meetings, Research
and development.
1136 Super-fund Remedial Action Decision Process:
Database for Selected FY87 Records of Decision
Order Number DE89010163CDH, price: PC A06/MF A01
Oak Ridge National Labi, TN.; Department of Energy,
Washington, DC; 1989
This report was prepared by Oak Ridge National Laborato-
ry's Office of Risk Analysis (ORNL/ORA) for the Regulatory
Integration Division of EPA's Office of Policy Analysis (OPA).
The purpose of the report is to present data compiled for
analysis of the Superfund decision-making process and char-
acterization of the role of risk assessment in this process.
Data presented are compiled from FY87 Records of Decision
(RODs) and their corresponding support documents. The
present report includes data from a total of 50 RODs from all
EPA regions. These data are summarized and analyzed in a
complementary report (Doty and Travis, 1989). In addition,
although no computerized database has been developed, the
data presented will be useful for addressing further research
questions related to the Superfund remedial action decision
process. (ERA citation 14:025341)
Specifications: Portions of this document are illegible in
microfiche products. 106p.
Subject index keywords: Ground Water, Superfund, Reme-
dial Action, Risk Assessment, Waste disposal, Water pollu-
tion.
1137 Superfund Remedial Program Financial Management
Authority, Responsibilities and Procedures
Order Number PB91-214106CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; 21 Sep 84
The directive discusses the Superfund delegations approved
April 16, 1984, the Regional Offices have additional authority
and responsibilities for significant portions of the remedial
program. This includes both programmatic and administrative
authority and responsibilities, described in detail in the vari-
ous Superfund remedial program guidance packages, and
specific financial management authority, responsibilities and
procedures described in the document.
Specifications: 28p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
Hazardous materials, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
Response.
1138 U.S. Bureau of Reclamation Assistance to the
Superfund Program
Order Number PB91-921319CDH, price: PC A01/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Dec 90
The fact sheet outlines assistance available from the Depart-
ment of the Interior's Bureau of Reclamation's Denver Office
and the five Regional Offices. Reclamation has developed
expertise in total project management, including planning,
engineering design, research, construction management, and
in project operation and maintenance. Under an Interagency
Agreement (IAG) entitled 'Superfund Management and Sup-
port Activities,' funding has been authorized for a number of
activities relating to Reclamation's assistance in Superfund.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $150 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $300). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 5p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
Hazardous materials, Bureau of Reclamation, Office of Solid
Waste and Emergency Response.
1139 USAGE Preplaced and Rapid Response Contracts
Order Number PB90-273889CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Dec 89
The fact sheet describes the Preplaced Remedial Action
(PRA) and Rapid Response (RR) programs and contracts. It
includes an overview of the contract processes, the roles
and responsibilities of USAGE and EPA, and resource and
contract management.
Specifications: 6p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Project
management, Contract administration, Superfund, Remedial
action, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response,
Waste management.
1140 Use of Removal Approaches to Speed Up Remedial
Action Projects
Order Number PB90-274382CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; 7 Jul 89
The directive defines the basic requirements to be met when
a Region chooses to use removal authorities and contracting
methods to speed up remedial projects on National Priorities
List (NPL) sites where surface cleanups may result in a total
site cleanup or completion of a major portion of the site.
Specifications: 10p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Superfund,
Waste management, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
Response, Remedial action.
1141 Use of Time and Materials and Cost Reimbursement
Subcontracts for Remedial Actions under the Alternative
Remedial Contracting Strategy Contracts
Order Number PB93-963282CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 29 Jul 92
The directive is intended to establish agency guidance on
the use of time and materials and cost reimbursement con-
tracts for remedial actions in general and to provide specific
instruction regarding the use of these approaches in subcon-
212
-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: RQ's & Continuous
Release
tracting under the Alternative Remedial Contracting Strategy
(ARCS) contracts.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 6p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
Hazardous materials, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
Response, Altrnative Remedial Contracting Strategy.
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: RQ's
& Continuous Release
1142 Assessing Reports of Continuous Releases of
Hazardous Substances: A Guide for EPA Regions
Order Number P891-921315CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Oct 90
Reporting continuous releases of hazardous substances that
equal or exceed a reportable quantity (RQ) has been re-
quired under the Comprehensive Environmental Response,
Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA) since its enact-
ment in 1980. Section 103(f)(2) of CERCLA provides that re-
leases of hazardous substances that are continuous and
stable in quantity and rate may be reported annually or
whenever there is a statistically significant increase (SSI).
The purpose of the guidance document is to provide assist-
ance to the EPA Regions by discussing and making recom-
mendations regarding the options available for evaluating re-
ports of continuous releases. The effective implementation of
the continuous release reporting regulation will depend large-
ly on whether the EPA Regions are able to fully and easily
evaluate the continuous release reports they receive.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available iri
paper copy or microfiche. 18p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Guidelines
Reporting requirements, Superfund, US EPA Regions 1-10,
Comprehensive Environmental Response Compensation and
Liability Act, Superfund.
1143 Continuous Release-Emergency Response
Notification System and Priority Assessment Model:
Model Documentation
Order Number PB91-168468CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; 13 Feb 91
The purpose of the model documentation is to provide a de-
tailed description of the modeling and risk analysis proce-
dures used in CR-ERNS/PAM to assist OSCs and other Su-
perfund decision-makers in interpreting the system results.
PAM is a screening-level model; to properly interpret PAM's
outputs, the user must understand the limitations and uncer-
tainties in the equations and data used to generate these re-
sults. Chapter 2 presents the system's fate and transport
models and describes the assumptions associated with these
equations. Chapter 3 describes PAM's auxiliary data bases
and provides the source(s) of each parameter and the meth-
ods by which values were selected. Chapter 4 explains the
methods and exposure assumptions used to estimate expo-
sures to hazardous substances and to evaluate the risks and
hazards associated with these exposures. Chapter 5 pre-
sents examples of reports generated by PAM and explains
the meaning of the 'flags' assigned to hazardous substances,
media, and facilities. Appendix A contains versions of the
fate and transport equations used for radionuclides. Appen-
dix B contains copies of PAM's reports.
Specifications: See also PB91-168450 and PB90-249715
75p.
Subject index keywords: Computerized simulation, Hazard-
ous materials, Superfund, Environmental surveys, Waste
management, Documentation, Emergency Response Notifi-
cation System, Priority Assessment Model.
1144 Continuous Release-Emergency Response
Notification System and Priority Assessment Model:
User's Manual for EPA Regions
Order Number PB91-168450CDH, price: PC A05/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Oct 90
The user's manual provides EPA Regional personnel with in-
formation and detailed instructions on how to use the Contin-
uous Release-Emergency Response Notification System
(CR-ERNS) and Priority Assessment Model (PAM), an inte-
grated database management system and screening-level
risk assessment model.
Specifications: See also PB90-249715 and PB91-168468.
88p.
Subject index keywords: User manuals(Computer pro-
grams), Computerized simulation, Hazardous materials, Su-
perfund, Environmental surveys, Waste management, Emer-
gency Response Notification System, Priority Assessment
Model.
1145 Continuous Release - Emergency Response
Notification System. User's Manual for Industry
Order Number PB91-921287CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Mar 91
The report announces the availability of the Agency's 'Con-
tinuous Release-Emergency Response Notification System:
User's manual for Industry' and the accompanying diskette.
The diskette contains the Continuous Release-Emergency
Response Notification System (CR-ERNS). The purpose of
the User's Manual is to assist industry in reporting continu-
ous releases of hazardous substances using CR-ERNS.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 36p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste dis-
posal, Superfund.
1146 Methodology for Evaluating Potential
Carcinogenicity in Support of Reportable Quantity
Adjustments Pursuant to CERCLA Section 102
Order Number PB93-230027CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Health and Environmental Assessment; Jun 88
The Agency's Human Health Assessment Group (HHAG) has
developed a methodology for ranking CERCLA hazardous
substances for the purpose of establishing reportable quanti-
ties (RQs) based on the primary criteria of potential carcino-
genicity. The methodology combines the weight of evidence
213
-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: RQ's & Continuous
Release
and potency factor to determine a hazard ranking of high,
medium, or low which corresponds to an RQ of 1, 10, or 100
pounds, respectively. An appendix is included which lists 194
compounds that were evaluated for potential carcinogenicity
along with their respective weight-of-evidence categories, po-
tency factors, and hazard rankings. Profiles for each of these
194 chemicals are available as separate documents.
Specifications: See also PB89-181366. 59p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Hazardous materials,
Health hazards, Risk assessment.
1147 Notification of Hazardous Substance Sites (Section
103(c))
Order Number PB82-191990CDH, price: T02
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC; Jan 82
The Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensa-
tion, and Liability Act (CERCLA) of 1980 PL 96-510 (com-
monly known as Superfund) mandates in Section 103(c) that
certain persons notify the U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) by June 9, 1981, of the existence of sites
where hazardous substances from industries, businesses,
governments, hospitals, and other sources are stored, treat-
ed, or disposed of. This magnetic tape contains records of
8664 notifications of hazardous substance sites that were re-
ported as of the notification deadline date, (June 9, 1981).
For each notification the tape summarizes the location,
person required to notify, amount and type of any hazardous
substance to be found, and any known or suspected re-
leases of hazardous substances on the site reported. The
notifications were compiled to help EPA and State and local
governments remedy problems created by uncontrolled haz-
ardous substance disposal. The tape is sequenced alphabeti-
cally by state and site name within each state, respectively.
Specifications: Source tape is in EBCDIC character set.
Character set restricts preparation to 9 track, one-half inch
tape only. Identify recording mode by specifying density only.
Call NTIS Computer Products if you have questions.
Subject Index keywords: Data file, Hazardous materials,
Solid waste disposal.
1148 Notification Requirements for Continuous Releases
of Hazardous Substances
Order Number PB92-963422CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 92
The fact sheet is designed to make facilities more familiar
with the Continuous Releases Final Rule (55 FR 30166, July
24, 1990), which permits reduced reporting of releases of
CERCLA hazardous substances when the releases are 'con-
tinuous and stable in quantity and rate.' It also discusses the
requirements of the continuous release reporting regulations
and addresses many key questions concerning their scope
and applicability, and answers questions about compliance
with the reduced reporting regime permitted for this type of
release.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 9p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Hazardous materials,
Waste management, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
Response.
1149 Questions and Answers on Release Notification
Requirements and Reportable Quantity Adjustments
Order Number PB93-963411CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Oct 89
The document answers questions for the regulatory commu-
nity concerning CERCLA and SARA Title III release notifica-
tion requirements and reportable quantity adjustments.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 28p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Reporting require-
ments, Pollutant releases.
1150 Reporting Requirements for Continuous Releases of
Hazardous Substances: A Guide for Facilities and
Vessels on Compliance
Order Number PB91-167593CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Oct 90
The purpose of the Guide is to help you understand the defi-
nitions and requirements contained in the U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency's (EPA) regulation on reporting continuous
releases of hazardous substances (see 55 FR 30166; July
24, 1990). The effective date of the regulation was Septem-
ber 24, 1990. The continuous release reporting regulation
allows reduced reporting for facilities or vessels that release
hazardous substances in a continuous and stable manner.
The Guide has been designed to provide information neces-
sary to successfully comply with the regulation. The Guide is
divided into two parts. The first part provides general infor-
mation in a question and answer format regarding the contin-
uous release reporting regulation and your responsibility to
report releases of hazardous substances. The second part
contains detailed instructions on how to prepare continuous
release reports that include all required information.
Specifications: 43p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Superfund,
Reporting requirements, Waste management, Comprehen-
sive Environmental Response Compensation and Liability
Act.
1151 Superfund Guide: Clean Air Act Hazardous Air
Pollutants Added to the List of CERCLA Hazardous
Substances
Order Number PB93-963425CDH, price: PC A01/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Sep 93
The fact sheet identifies the 52 CAA hazardous air pollutants
that have been added to the list of CERCLA hazardous sub-
stances and that are now subject to CERCLA requirements;
describes the reporting requirements and exemptions under
CERCLA; and examines reporting exemptions in relation to
releases of ethylene glycol.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 5p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Air pollution,
Identifying, Superfund.
214
-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Treatebility Sludies
1152 Superfund Guide: Reportable Quantity Adjustment
for Methyl Isocyanate (MIC)
Order Number PB93-963424CDH, price: PC A0.1/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Sep 93
The fact sheet contains a discussion of the reportable quan-
tity (RQ) adjustment and release reporting process, the basis
for the current RQ adjustment to 10 pounds for methyl iso-
cyanate (MIC), and information about the facilities that
handle MIC.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S Canada
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 4p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Volatile or-
ganic compounds, Pollution control, Superfund, Methyl iso-
cyanate. *
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION:
Treatability Studies
1153 Chemical Dehalogenation Treatability Studies under
CERCLA: An Overview
Order Number PB92-231299CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
IT Corp., Sharonville, OH.; Environmental Protection Agency,
Cincinnati, OH. Risk Reduction Engineering Lab; May 92
The fact sheet provides a summary of information to facili-
tate the planning and execution of chemical dehalogenation
treatabihty studies in support of the RI/FS process. Detailed
information on these pre-ROD treatability studies is provided
m the Guide for Conducting Treatability Studies Under
CERCLA: Chemical Dehalogenation, EPA/540/R-92/013a,
May 1992. The technology-specific guide was designed to be
used in conjunction with the final generic Guide for Conduct-
ing Treatability Studies Under CERCLA, which provides gen-
eral information on the planning and execution of pre- and
post-ROD treatability studies. Although some information on
post-ROD chemical dehalogenation testing is provided here
the focus of the fact sheet and the chemical dehalogenation
guide is on pre-ROD treatability studies.
Specifications: See also PB92-169275. Sponsored by Envi-
ronmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk Reduction
Engineering Lab. 10p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Chemical
analysis, Waste treatment, Superfund, Dehalogenation.
1154 Guide for Conducting Treatability Studies under
CERCLA
Order Number PB90-249772CDH, price: PC A07/MF A01
PEI Associates, Inc., Cincinnati, OH.; Environmental
Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of Emergency
and Remedial Response; Dec 89
The guide describes an approach for conducting treatability
studies that consists of laboratory screening, bench-scale
testing, and pilot-scale testing. The guide also presents a
stepwise approach or protocol for conducting treatability
studies for determination of the effectiveness of a technology
(or combination of technologies) in remediating a CERCLA
site.
Specifications: Sponsored by Environmental Protection
Agency, Washington, DC. Office of Emergency and Remedial
Response. 134p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Superfund,
Remedial action, Comprehensive Environmental Response
Compensation and Liability Act.
1155 Guide for Conducting Treatability Studies under
CERCLA
Order Number PB93-126787CDH, price: PC A05/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Nov 92
Systemically conducted, well-documented treatability studies
are an important component of the removal process, remedi-
al investigation/feasibility study (RI/FS) process and the re-
medial design/remedial action (RD/RA) process under the
Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation,
and Liability Act (CERCLA). The guide describes a three-
tiered approach for conducting treatability studies that con-
sists of (1) remedy screening, (2) remedy-selection testing,
and (3) RD/RA testing.
Specifications: See also PB91-249772. 83p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste treat-
ment, Superfund, Remedial action.
1156 Guide for Conducting Treatability Studies under
CERCLA: Aerobic Biodegradation Remedy Screening
Order Number PB92-109073CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Science Applications International Corp., Cincinnati, OH.;
Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk
Reduction Engineering Lab; Jul 91
The fact sheet provides a summary of information to facili-
tate the planning and execution of aerobic biodegradation
remedy screening treatability studies in support of the RI/FS
and the remedial design/remedial action (RD/RA) process-
es. The fact sheet follows the organization of the 'Guide for
Conducting Treatability Studies Under CERCLA: Aerobic Bio-
degradation Remedy Screening, Interim Guidance (PB92-
109065), July 1991. Detailed information on designing and
implementing remedy screening and remedy selection treat-
ability studies for aerobic biodegradation is provided in the
guidance document. The guidance discusses only screening
of biological treatment. Remedy selection guidance for aero-
bic biodegradation is currently in the planning stages.
Specifications: See also PB92-109065 and PB90-249772.
Sponsored by Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati,
OH. Risk Reduction Engineering Lab. 9p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
Hazardous materials, Biodeterioration, Aerobic processes,
Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response, Prereme-
dial actions.
1157 Guide for Conducting Treatability Studies under
CERCLA: Aerobic Biodegradation Remedy Screening.
Interim Guidance
Order Number PB92-109065CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Science Applications International Corp., Cincinnati, OH.;
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Jul 91
Systematically conducted, well-documented treatability stud-
ies are an important component of remedy evaluation and
selection under the Superfund program. The manual focuses
on aerobic biodegradation remedy screening treatability stud-
ies conducted in support of remedy selection that is conduct-
ed prior to the Record of Decision (ROD). The manual pre-
sents a standard guide for designing and implementing an
215
-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Treatability Studies
aerobic biodegradation remedy screening treatability study.
The manual presents a description of and discusses the ap-
plicability and limitations of aerobic biodegradation technol-
ogies and defines the prescreening and field measurement
data needed to determine if treatability testing is required. It
also presents an overview of the process of conducting
treatabiiity tests and the applicability of tiered treatability test-
ing for evaluation aerobic biodegradation technologies. The
specific goals of each tier of testing are defined and perform-
ance levels are presented that should be met at the remedy
screening level before additional tests are conducted at the
next tier. The elements of a treatability study work plan are
also defined with detailed discussions on the design and
execution of the remedy screening treatability study.
Specifications: See also PB90-249772 and PB92-109073.
Sponsored by Environmental Protection Agency, Washington,
DC. Office of Emergency and Remedial Response. 43p.
Subject Index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
Hazardous materials, Biodeterioration, Aerobic processes,
Preremedial actions.
1158 Guide for Conducting Treatability Studies under
CERCLA: Aerobic Biodegradation Remedy Screening.
Quick Reference Fact Sheet
Order Number PB92-224377CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Jul 91
The fact sheet provides a summary of information to facili-
tate the planning and execution of aerobic biodegradation
remedy screening treatability studies in support of the reme-
dial investigation/feasibility study (RI/FS) and the remedial
design/remedial action (RD/RA) processes. This fact sheet
follows the organization of the 'Guide for Conducting Treat-
ability Studies Under CERCLA: Aerobic Biodegradation
Remedy Screening, Interim Guidance,' EPA/540/2-91/013A,
July 1991. Detailed information on designing and implement-
ing remedy screening and remedy selection treatability stud-
ies for aerobic biodegradation is provided in the guidance
document. This guidance discusses only screening of biologi-
cal treatment. Remedy selection guidance for aerobic biode-
gradation is currently in the planning stages.
Specifications: See also PB92-109065. 9p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
Hazardous materials, Aerobic processes, Biodeterioration,
Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response.
1159 Guide for Conducting Treatability Studies under
CERCLA: Biodegradation Remedy Selection. Interim
Guidance
Order Number PB94-117470CDH, price: PC A05/MF A01
Science Applications International Corp., Cincinnati, OH.;
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; 1993
The primary purpose of the guide is to provide standard guid-
ance for designing and implementing a biodegradation treat-
ability study In support of remedy selection testing. Addition-
ally, it describes a three-tiered approach that consists of (1)
rerrtedy screening testing, (2) remedy selection testing, and
(3) remedial design/remedial action testing. It also presents
a guide for conducting treatability studies in a systematic and
stepwise fashion for determination of the effectiveness of
biodegradation in remediating a site. The intended audience
for the guide includes Remedial Project Managers, On-Scene
Coordinators, Potentially Responsible Parties, consultants,
contractors, and technology vendors.
Specifications: See also PB93-126787. Sponsored by Envi-
ronmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response. 85p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Hazardous materials,
Bioremediation.
1160 Guide for Conducting Treatability Studies under
CERCLA: Biodegradation Remedy Selection. Quick
Reference Fact Sheet
Order Number PB94-144136CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Aug 93
This fact sheet provides a summary of information to facili-
tate the planning and execution of biodegradation remedy
selection treatability studies in support of the remedial inves-
tigation/feasibility study (RI/FS) and the remedial design/re-
medial action (RD/RA) processes. It is intended to provide
Remedial Project Managers (RPMs), On Scene Coordinators
(OSCs), Potentially Responsible Parties (PRPs), and other in-
terested persons with enough information to determine
whether biodegradation treatability studies may be consid-
ered in the remedy selection phase of the RI/FS for the
Comprehensive Environmental Response Compensation and
Liability Act (CERCLA) site of interest. This fact sheet follows
the organization of the 'Guide for Conducting Treatability
Studies Under CERCLA: Biodegradation Remedy Selection,
'EPA/540/R-93/514A', 1993. Detailed information on design-
ing and implementing remedy selection treatability studies for
biodegradation is provided in the guidance document.
Specifications: See also PB94-117470. 11 p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
Hazardous materials, Biodeterioration, Office of Solid Waste
and Emergency Response.
1161 Guide for Conducting Treatability Studies under
CERCLA: Chemical Dehalogenation
Order Number PB92-169044CDH, price: PC A05/MF A01
IT Corp., Sharonville, OH.; Environmental Protection Agency,
Cincinnati, OH. Risk Reduction Engineering Lab; May 92
Systematically conducted, well-documented treatability stud-
ies are an important component of the remedial investiga-
tion/feasibility study (RI/FS) process and the remedial
design/remedial action (RD/RA) process under the Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liabil-
ity Act (CERCLA). The guide, which presents information on
treatability studies involving chemical dehalogenation of soils
and sludges, is intended to supplement the information in the
final generic guide. The guide describes a three-tiered ap-
proach for conducting treatability studies, which consists of
(1) remedy screening, (2) remedy selection, and (3) remedial
design/remedial action. The purpose of remedy-screening
studies for chemical dehalogenation technologies is to deter-
mine if the technology is chemically feasible for the contami-
nants/matrix of concern. The guide also presents detailed,
technology-specific information on the preparation of a Work
Plan and a Sampling and Analysis Plan for chemical dehalo-
genation treatability studies. Elements discussed include test
objectives, experimental design and procedures, equipment
and materials, sampling and analysis procedures, quality as-
surance/quality control procedures, and data analysis and in-
terpretation.
216
-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Treatability Studies
Specifications: See also PB92-169275 and PB91-228031.
Sponsored by Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati,
OH. Risk Reduction Engineering Lab. 80p.
Subject index keywords: Waste management, Superfund,
Environmental surveys, Hazardous materials, Chemical treat-
ment, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response.
1162 Guide for Conducting Treatability Studies under
CERCLA: Chemical Dehalogenation. Final Report
Order Number PB92-231307CDH, price: PC A05/MF A01
IT Corp., Sharonville, OH.; Environmental Protection Agency,
Cincinnati, OH. Risk Reduction Engineering Lab; May 92
Systematically conducted, well-documented treatability stud-
ies are an important component of the remedial investiga-
tion/feasibility study (RI/FS) process and the remedial
design/remedial action (RD/RA) process under the Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liabil-
ity Act (CERCLA). The guide describes a three-tiered ap-
proach for conducting treatability studies, which consists of
(1) remedy screening, (2) remedy selection, and (3) remedial
design/remedial action. The purpose of remedy-screening
studies for chemical dehalogenation technologies is to deter-
mine if the technology is chemically feasible for the contami-
nants/matrix of concern. Remedial design/remedial action
studies, which are performed post-ROD, provide detailed
design and operating data necessary to scale up and imple-
ment the technology.
Specifications: See also PB92-169044. Sponsored by Envi-
ronmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk Reduction
Engineering Lab. 81 p.
Subject index keywords: Waste management, Hazardous
materials, Superfund.
1163 Guide for Conducting Treatability Studies under
CERCLA: Soil Vapor Extraction. Interim Guidance
Order Number PB92-227271CDH, price: PC A05/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 91
Section 121(b) of the Comprehensive Environmental Re-
sponse, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980 (CERCLA)
mandates the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)
to select remedies that 'utilize permanent solutions and alter-
native treatment technologies or resource recovery technol-
ogies to the maximum extent practicable'. Treatability studies
conducted during the RI/FS phase indicate whether a given
technology can meet the expected cleanup goals for the site.
The document refers to three levels or tiers of treatability
studies: remedy screening, remedy selection, and remedy
design.
Specifications: See also PB92-224401. 83p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Recovery
Waste treatment, Soils.
1164 Guide for Conducting Treatability Studies under
CERCLA: Soil Vapor Extraction. Quick Reference Fact
Sheet
Order Number PB92-224401CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Sep 91
The fact sheet provides a summary of information to facili-
tate the planning and execution of soil vapor extraction
(SVE) remedy screening and remedy selection treatability
studies in support or'the remedial investigation/feasibility
study (RI/FS) and the remedial design/remedial action (RD/
RA) processes. Detailed information on designing and imple-
menting remedy screening and remedy selection treatability
studies for SVE is provided in the 'Guide for Conducting
Treatability Studies Under CERCLA: Soil Vapor Extraction,'
Interim Guidance, EPA/540/2-91/019A, September 1991.
Specifications: 10p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
Hazardous materials, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
Response, Soil vapor extraction.
1165 Guide for Conducting Treatability Studies under
CERCLA: Soil Washing. Interim Guidance
Order Number PB92-170570CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Science Applications International Corp., Cincinnati, OH.;
Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk
Reduction Engineering Lab; Sep 91
Systematically conducted, well-documented treatability stud-
ies are an important component of the remedial investiga-
tion/feasibility study (RI/FS) process and the remedial
design/remedial action (RD/RA) process under the Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act (CERCLA). The studies provide valuable site-specific
data necessary to aid in the selection and implementation of
the remedy. The manual focuses on soil washing treatability
studies conducted in support of remedy selection prior to de-
veloping the Record of Decision. The manual presents guid-
ance for designing and implementing a soil washing treatabil-
ity study. The manual gives an overview of general informa-
tion for determining whether soil washing technology may be
effective guidance in designing and conducting soil washing
treatability studies for remedy selection, assistance in inter-
preting data obtained from remedy selection treatability stud-
ies, and guidance to estimate costs associated with remedy
design and full-scale soil washing remedial action. The
manual is not intended to serve as a substitute for communi-
cation with reports or regulators nor as the sole basis for the
selection of soil washing as a particular remediation technol-
ogy. Soil washing must be used in conjunction with other
treatment technologies since it generates residuals. The
manual is designed to be used in conjunction with the Guide
for Conducting Treatability Studies Under CERCLA; Interim
Final.
Specifications: See also PB89-132674, PB89-212757 and
PB90-249772. Sponsored by Environmental Protection
Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk Reduction Engineering Lab.
47p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Remedial action, Land
pollution control, Soil treatment, Comprehensive Environmen-
tal Response Compensation and Liability Act, Soil washing.
1166 Guide for Conducting Treatability Studies under
CERCLA: Soil Washing: Quick Reference Fact Sheet
Order Number PB92-170588CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Science Applications International Corp., Cincinnati, OH.;
Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk
Reduction Engineering Lab; Sep 91
The fact sheet provides a summary of information to facili-
tate the planning and execution of soil washing remedy se-
lection treatability studies in support of the RI/FS and the re-
medial design/remedial action (RD/RA) processes. The fact
sheet follows the organization of the 'Guide for the 'Conduct-
ing Treatability Studies Under CERCLA: Soil Washing,' Inter-
im Guidance, (PB92-170570) September 1991. Detailed infor-
217
-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Treatability Studies
matron on designing and implementing remedy selection
treatability studies for soil washing is provided in the guid-
ance cJocument.
Specifications: See also PB92-170570. Sponsored by Envi-
ronmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk Reduction
Engineering Lab. 9p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Remedial action, Land
pollution control, Soil treatment, Comprehensive Environmen-
tal Response Compensation and Liability Act, Soil washing,
Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response.
1167 Guide for Conducting Treatability Studies under
CERCLA Solvent Extraction. Interim Guidance
Order Number PB92-239581CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Science Applications International Corp., Cincinnati, OH.;
Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk
Reduction Engineering Lab; Aug 92
Systematically conducted, well-documented treatability stud-
ies are an important component of remedy evaluation and
selection under the Superfund program. This manual focuses
on solvent extraction treatability studies. This manual pre-
sents a standard guide for designing and implementing sol-
vent extraction treatability studies. The manual presents a
description of and discusses the applicability and limitations
of solvent extraction technologies and defines the prescreen-
ing and field measurement data needed to determine if treat-
ability testing is required. It also presents an overview of the
process of conducting treatability tests and the applicability
of tiered treatability testing for evaluation solvent extraction
technologies. The specific goals of each tier of testing are
defined and performance levels are presented that should be
met at the remedy screening level before additional tests are
conducted at the next tier.
Specifications: Sponsored by Environmental Protection
Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk Reduction Engineering Lab.
47p.
Subject index keywords: Waste management, Hazardous
materials, Superfund, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
Response.
1168 Guide for Conducting Treatability Studies under
CERCLA: Solvent Extraction Quick Reference Fact Sheet
Order Number PB92-239599CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Science Applications International Corp., Cincinnati, OH.;
Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk
Reduction Engineering Lab; Aug 92
Systematically conducted, well-documented treatability stud-
ies are an important component of remedy evaluation and
selection under the Superfund Program. This fact sheet fo-
cuses on solvent extraction treatability studies, and is a
highly abridged version of the guide which bears the same
title. This fact sheet presents an abbreviated guide for de-
signing and implementing solvent extraction treatability stud-
ies. The fact sheet presents a description of and discusses
the applicability and limitations of solvent extraction technol-
ogies and defines the prescreening and field measurement
data needed to determine if treatability testing is required.
Specifications: See also PB92-239581. Sponsored by Envi-
ronmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk Reduction
Engineering Lab. 9p.
Subject index keywords: Waste management, Hazardous
materials, Superfund, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
Response.
1169 Guide for Conducting Treatability Studies under
CERCLA: Thermal Desorption Quick Reference Fact
Sheet
Order Number PB93-12132^CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Science Applications International Corp., Cincinnati, OH.;
Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk
Reduction Engineering Lab; Sep 92
Systematically conducted, well documented treatability stud-
ies are an important component of remedy evaluation and
selection under the Superfund program. This fact sheet fo-
cuses on thermal desorptibn remedy selection treatability
studies conducted in support of remedy selection that is con-
ducted prior to the Record of Decision (ROD). This fact
sheet presents a brief overview of how to design and imple-
ment a thermal desorption remedy screening treatability
study. It also discusses the applicability of tiered treatability
testing for evaluation of thermal desorption technologies.
Specifications: Sponsored by Environmental Protection
Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk Reduction Engineering Lab. 9p.
Subject index keywords: Waste management, Superfund,
Hazardous materials, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
Response.
1170 Guide for Conducting Treatability Studies under
CERCLA: Thermal Desorption Remedy Selection. Interim
Guidance
Order Number PB93-126597CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Science Applications International Corp., Cincinnati, OH.;
Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk
Reduction Engineering Lab; Sep 92
Systematically conducted, well-documented treatability stud-
ies are an important component of remedy evaluation and
selection under the Superfund program. The manual focuses
on thermal desorption remedy selection treatability studies
conducted in support of remedy selection that is conducted
prior to the Record of Decision (ROD). The manual presents
a standard guide for designing and implementing a thermal
desorption remedy selection treatability study. The manual
presents a description of arid discusses and defines the pre-
screening and field measurement data needed to determine
if treatability testing is required. It also presents an overview
of the process of conducting treatability tests and the appli-
cability of tiered treatability testing for evaluation of thermal
desorption technologies. The specific goals of each tier of
testing are defined and performance levels are presented
that should be met at the remedy screening level before ad-
ditional tests are conducted at the next tier. The elements of
a treatability study work plan are also defined with detailed
discussions on the design and execution of the remedy
screening treatability study.
Specifications: See also PB93-121325. Sponsored by Envi-
ronmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk Reduction
Engineering Lab. 47p.
Subject index keywords: Heat treatment, Superfund, Re-
medial action, Waste management, Organic compounds,
Thermal desorption.
218
-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: 103(C)
1171 Inventory of Treatability Study Vendors. Volume 1
Order Number PB91-228395CDH, price: PC A14/MF A03
PEI Associates, Inc., Arlington, VA.; Environmental Protection
Agency, Washington, DC. Office of Emergency and Remedial
Response; Mar 90
The document was developed to facilitate the performance
of treatability studies by ensuring that requests for proposals
(RFPs) for treatability studies are made available to the
broadest subset of contractors who can perform such stud-
ies. The listing is not a pre-qualification of contractors and all
RFPs must be done in accordance with the Federal Acquisi-
tions Regulations. The information contained in the inventory
has been organized into two volumes. Volume I provides list-
ings of treatability study vendors organized by technology
and contaminant groups. The intended users of the docu-
ment are Superfund remedial project managers and contrac-
tors who are involved in a procurement process to obtain a
treatability study. Volume II provides vendor specific informa-
tion, i.e., permit status and scale of studies conducted. The
information can be obtained by contacting the vendors identi-
fied in Volume I. Volume II is not available. Both Volume I
and II are being updated.
Specifications: Sponsored by Environmental Protection
Agency, Washington, DC. Office of Emergency and Remedial
Response. 302p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Remedial
action, Waste treatment, Superfund, Vendors.
1172 Treatability Studies Under CERCLA: An Overview
Order Number PB90-273970CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Dec 89
The fact sheet provides a synopsis of information to facilitate
the planning and execution of treatability studies in support
of the RI/FS and the RD/RA processes.
Specifications: 8p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste treat-
ment, Superfund, Waste management, Office of Solid Waste
and Emergency Response, Comprehensive Environmental
Response Compensation and Liability Act.
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: 103(c)
1173 Notification of Hazardous Waste Sites Required
Under Section 103(c) of the Comprehensive
Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability
Act (CERCLA) of 1980
Order Number PB82-213984CDH, price: PC$351.00
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC; Mar 82
Specifications: Set includes PB82-213992 through PB82-
214081.3180p-in 10v.
1174 Notification of Hazardous Waste Sites Required
Under Section 103(c) of the Comprehensive
Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability
Act (CERCLA) of 1980: EPA Region 1
Order Number PB82-213992CDH, price: PC A08/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC; Mar 82
The Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensa-
tion, and Liability Act (CERCLA) of 1980 PL 96-510 (com-
monly known as Superfund) mandates in Section 103(c) that
certain persons notify the U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) by June 9, 1981 of the existence of sites
where hazardous wastes from industries, businesses, gov-
ernment, hospitals, and other sources are stored, treated or
disposed of. This document comprises a listing of 8,755 noti-
fications of hazardous waste sites. For each notification, the
listing summarizes the location, the persons required to
notify, the amount and type of any hazardous waste to be
found on the site reported, and any known or suspected re-
leases of hazardous wastes. The CERCLA 103(c) notification
was mandated to help EPA and State and local governments
remedy problems created by uncontrolled hazardous waste
disposal. This document contains ten volumes, one for each
EPA region. Within each volume, the notifications are pre-
sented alphabetically by state and site name within each
state, respectively.
Specifications: Also available in set of 10 reports PC E99,
PB82-213984. See also PB82-214008. 170p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste dis-
posal, Comprehensive environmental response, Toxic sub-
stances, EPA region 1.
1175 Notification of Hazardous Waste Sites Required
Under Section 103(c) of the Comprehensive
Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability
Act (CERCLA) of 1980: EPA Region 2
Order Number PB82-214008CDH, price: PC A14/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC; Mar 82
The Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensa-
tion, and Liability Act (CERCLA) of 1980 PL 96-510 (com-
monly known as Superfund) mandates in Section 103(c) that
certain persons notify the U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) by June 9, 1981 of the existence of sites
where hazardous wastes from industries, businesses, gov-
ernment, hospitals, and other sources are stored, treated or
disposed of. This document comprises a listing of 8,755 noti-
fications of hazardous waste sites. For each notification, the
listing summarizes the location, the persons required to
notify, the amount and type of any hazardous waste to be
found on the site reported, and any known or suspected re-
leases of hazardous wastes. The CERCLA 103(c) notification
was mandated to help EPA and State and local governments
remedy problems created by uncontrolled hazardous waste
disposal. This document contains ten volumes, one for each
EPA region. Within each volume, the notifications are pre-
sented alphabetically by state and site name within each
state, respectively.
Specifications: Also available in set of 10 reports PC E99,
PB82-213984. See also PB82-213992, and PB82-214016.
311 p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste dis-
posal, Comprehensive environmental response, Toxic sub-
stances, EPA region 2.
1176 Notification of Hazardous Waste Sites Required
Under Section 103(c) of the Comprehensive
Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability
Act (CERCLA) of 1980: EPA Region 3
Order Number PB82-214016CDH, price: PC A16/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC; Mar 82
The Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensa-
tion, and Liability Act (CERCLA) of 1980 PL 96-510 (com-
monly known as Superfund) mandates in Section 103(c) that
certain persons notify the U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) by June 9, 1981 of the existence of sites
219
-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: 103(c)
where hazardous wastes from industries, businesses, gov-
ernment, hospitals, and other sources are stored, treated or
disposed of. This document comprises a listing of 8,755 noti-
fications of hazardous waste sites. For each notification, the
listing summarizes the location, the persons required to
notify, the amount and type of any hazardous waste to be
found on the site reported, and any known or suspected re-
leases of hazardous wastes. The CERGLA 103(c) notification
was mandated to help EPA and State and local governments
remedy problems created by uncontrolled hazardous waste
disposal. This document contains ten volumes, one for each
EPA region. Within each volume, the notifications are pre-
sented alphabetically by state and site name within each
state, respectively.
Specifications: Also available in set of 10 reports PC E99,
PB82-213984. See also PB82-214008, and PB82-214024.
367p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste dis-
posal. Comprehensive environmental response, Toxic sub-
stances, EPA region 3.
lid , • I • ' I , I!' ' • • • •
1177 Notification of Hazardous Waste Sites Required
Under Section 103(c) of the Comprehensive
Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability
Act (CERCLA) of 1980: EPA Region 4
Order Number PB82-214024CDH, price: PC A20/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC; Mar 82
The Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensa-
tion, and Liability Act (CERCLA) of 1980 PL 96-510 (com-
monly known as Superfund) mandates in Section 103(c) that
certain persons notify the U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) by June 9, 1981 of the existence of sites
where hazardous wastes from industries, businesses, gov-
ernment, hospitals, and other sources are stored, treated or
disposed of. This document comprises a listing of 8,755 noti-
fications of hazardous waste sites. For each notification, the
listing summarizes the location, the persons required to
notify, the amount and type of any hazardous waste to be
found on the site reported, and any known or suspected re-
leases of hazardous wastes. The CERCLA 103(c) notification
was mandated to help EPA and State and local governments
remedy problems created by uncontrolled hazardous waste
disposal. This document contains ten volumes, one for each
EPA region. Within each volume, the notifications are pre-
sented alphabetically by state and site name within each
state, respectively.
Specifications: Also available in set of 10 reports PC E99,
PB82-213984. See also PB82-214016, and PB82-214032.
474p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste dis-
posal, Comprehensive environmental response, Toxic sub-
stances, EPA region 4.
1178 Notification of Hazardous Waste Sites Required
Under Section 103(c) of the Comprehensive
Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability
Act (CERCLA) of 1980: EPA Region 5
Order Number PB82-214032CDH, price: PC$84.00
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC; Mar 82
The Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensa-
tion, and Liability Act (CERCLA) of 1980 PL 96-510 (com-
monly known as Superfund) mandates in Section 103(c) that
certain persons notify the U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) by June 9, 1981 of the existence of sites
where hazardous wastes from industries, businesses, gov-
ernment, hospitals, and other sources are stored, treated or
disposed of. This document comprises a listing of 8,755 noti-
fications of hazardous waste sites. For each notification, the
listing summarizes the location, the persons required to
notify, the amount and type of any hazardous waste to be
found on the site reported, and any known or suspected re-
leases of hazardous wastes. The CERCLA 103 (c) notifica-
tion was mandated to help EPA and State and local govern-
ments remedy problems created by uncontrolled hazardous
waste disposal. This document contains ten volumes, onefor
each EPA region. Within each volume, the notifications are
presented alphabetically by state and site name within each
state, respectively.
Specifications: Also available in set of 10 reports PC E99,
PB82-213984. See also PB82-214024, and PB82-214040.
Portions of this document are not fully legible. 719p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste dis-
posal, Comprehensive environmental response, Toxic sub-
stances, EPA region 5.
1179 Notification of Hazardous Waste Sites Required
Under Section 103(c) of the Comprehensive
Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability
Act (CERCLA) of 1980: EPA Region 6
Order Number PB82-214040CDH, price: PC A17/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC; Mar 82
The Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensa-
tion, and Liability Act (CERCLA) of 1980 PL 96-510 (com-
monly known as Superfund) mandates in Section 103(c) that
certain persons notify the U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) by June 9, 1981 of the existence of sites
where hazardous wastes from industries, businesses, gov-
ernment, hospitals, and other sources are stored, treated or
disposed of. This document comprises a listing of 8,755 noti-
fications of hazardous waste sites. For each notification, the
listing summarizes the location, the persons required to
notify, the amount and type of any hazardous waste to be
found on the site reported, and any known or suspected re-
leases of hazardous wastes. The CERCLA 103(c) notification
was mandated to help EPA and State and local governments
remedy problems created by uncontrolled hazardous waste
disposal. This document contains ten volumes, one for each
EPA region. Within each volume, the notifications are pre-
sented alphabetically by state and site name within each
state, respectively.
Specifications: Also available in set of 10 reports PC E99,
PB82-213984. See also PB82-214032, and PB82-214057.
Portions of this document are not fully legible. 379p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste dis-
posal, Comprehensive environmental response, Toxic sub-
stances, EPA region 6.
1180 Notification of Hazardous Waste Sites Required
Under Section 103(c) of the Comprehensive
Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability
Act (CERCLA) of 1980: EPA Region 7
Order Number PB82-214057CDH, price: PC A10/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC; Mar 82
The Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensa-
tion, and Liability Act (CERCLA) of 1980 PL 96-510 (com-
monly known as Superfund) mandates in Section 103(c) that
certain persons notify the U.S. Environmental Protection
220
-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: 103(C)
Agency (EPA) by June 9, 1981 of the existence of sites
where hazardous wastes from industries, businesses, gov-
ernment, hospitals, and other sources are stored, treated or
disposed of. This document comprises a listing of 8,755 noti-
fications of hazardous waste sites. For each notification, the
listing summarizes the location, the persons required to
notify, the amount and type of any hazardous waste to be
found on the site reported, and any known or suspected re-
leases of hazardous wastes. The CERCLA 103(c) notification
was mandated to help EPA and State and local governments
remedy problems created by uncontrolled hazardous waste
disposal. This document contains ten volumes, one for each
EPA region. Within each volume, the notifications are pre-
sented alphabetically by state and site name within each
state, respectively.
Specifications: Also available in set of 10 reports PC E99
PB82-213984. See also PB82-214040, and PB82-214065'
211p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste dis-
posal, Comprehensive environmental response, Toxic sub-
stances, EPA region 7.
1181 Notification of Hazardous Waste Sites Required
Under Section 103(c) of the Comprehensive
Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability
Act (CERCLA) of 1980: EPA Region 8
Order Number PB82-214065CDH, price: PC A06/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC; Mar 82
The Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensa-
tion, and Liability Act (CERCLA) of 1980 PL 96-510 (com-
monly known as Superfund) mandates in Section 103(c) that
certain persons notify the U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) by June 9, 1981 of the existence of sites
where hazardous wastes from industries, businesses, gov-
ernment, hospitals, and other sources are stored, treated or
disposed of. This document comprises a listing of 8,755 noti-
fications of hazardous waste sites. For each notification, the
listing summarizes the location, the persons required to
notify, the amount and type of any hazardous waste to be
found on the site reported, and any known or suspected re-
leases of hazardous wastes. The CERCLA 103(c) notification
was mandated to help EPA and State and local governments
remedy problems created by uncontrolled hazardous waste
disposal. This document contains ten volumes, one for each
EPA region. Within each volume, the notifications are pre-
sented alphabetically by state and site name within each
state, respectively.
Specifications: Also available in set of 10 reports PC E99
PB82-213984. See also PB82-214057, and PB82-214073'
123p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste dis-
posal, Comprehensive environmental response, Toxic sub-
stances, EPA region 8.
1182 Notification of Hazardous Waste Sites Required
Under Section 103(c) of the Comprehensive
Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability
Act (CERCLA) of 1980: EPA Region 9
Order Number PB82-214073CDH, price: PC A13/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC; Mar 82
The Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensa-
tion, and Liability Act (CERCLA) of 1980 PL 96-510 (com-
monly known as Superfund) mandates in Section 103(c) that
certain persons notify the U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) by June 9, 1981 of the existence of sites
where hazardous wastes from industries, businesses, gov-
ernment, hospitals, and other sources are stored, treated or
disposed of. This document comprises a listing of 8,755 noti-
fications of hazardous waste sites. For each notification, the
listing summarizes the location, the persons required to
notify, the amount and type of any hazardous waste to be
found on the site reported, and any known or suspected re-
leases of hazardous wastes. The CERCLA 103(c) notification
was mandated to help EPA and State and local governments
remedy problems created by uncontrolled hazardous waste
disposal. This document contains ten volumes, one for each
EPA region. Within each volume, the notifications are pre-
sented alphabetically by state and site name within each
state, respectively.
Specifications: Also available in set of 10 reports PC E99,
PB82-213984. See also PB82-214065, and PB82-214081.
284p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste dis-
posal, Comprehensive environmental response, Toxic sub-
stances, EPA region 9.
1183 Notification of Hazardous Waste Sites Required
Under Section 103(c) of the Comprehensive
Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability
Act (CERCLA) of 1980: EPA Region 10
Order Number PB82-214081CDH, price: PC A07/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC; Mar 82
The Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensa-
tion, and Liability Act (CERCLA) of 1980 PL 96-510 (com-
monly known as Superfund) mandates in Section 103(c) that
certain persons notify the U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) by June 9, 1981 of the existence of sites
where hazardous wastes from industries, businesses, gov-
ernment, hospitals, and other sources are stored, treated or
disposed of. This document comprises a listing of 8,755 noti-
fications of hazardous waste sites. For each notification, the
listing summarizes the location, the persons required to
notify, the amount and type of any hazardous waste to be
found on the site reported, and any known or suspected re-
leases of hazardous wastes. The CERCLA 103(c) notification
was mandated to help EPA and State and local governments
remedy problems created by uncontrolled hazardous waste
disposal. This document contains ten volumes, one for each
EPA region. Within each volume, the notifications are pre-
sented alphabetically by state and site name within each
state, respectively.
Specifications: Also available in set of 10 reports PC E99,
PB82-213984. See also PB82-214073. 142p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste dis-
posal, Comprehensive environmental response, Toxic sub-
stances, EPA region 10.
221
-------
TECHNOLOGY POLICY & ADMINISTRATION:
Conference Proceedings
TECHNOLOGY POLICY &
ADMINISTRATION: Conference
proceedings
1184 Annual RREL Research Symposium (20th) Abstract
Proceedings. Held in Cincinnati, Ohio on March 15-17,
1994
Order Number PB94-159092CDH, price: PC A12/MF A03
Science Applications International Corp., Fort Washington,
PA.; Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk
Reduction Engineering Lab; Mar 94
The Twentieth Annual Risk Reduction Engineering Laborato-
ry (RREL) Research Symposium was held in Cincinnati, Ohio,
March 15-17, 1994. The purpose of this Symposium was to
present the latest significant research findings from ongoing
and recently completed projects funded by the Risk Reduc-
tion Engineering Laboratory. These Proceedings are orga-
nized into two sections. Part One contains extended ab-
stracts of the paper presentations. Part Two contains ab-
stracts of the poster displays. Subjects include pollution pre-
vention demonstrations and life cycle analysis; remediation
technologies from the SITE Program, RREL technologies,
and oil spills remediation technologies; drinking water and
wastewater technologies; municipal solid waste technologies;
and hazardous waste technologies.
Specifications: See also PB92-166859. Sponsored by Envi-
ronmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk Reduction
Engineering Lab. 255p.
Subject Index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste man-
agement, Meetings.
TECHNOLOGY POLICY &
ADMINISTRATION: Electronic Tools
1185 Accessing Federal Data Bases for Contaminated
Site Clean-Up Technologies (Third Edition)
Order Number PB94-144540CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Federal Remediation Technologies Roundtable.;
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC.
Technology Innovation Office; Oct 93
Table of Contents: Alternative Treatment Technology Infor-
mation Center (ATTIC); Case Study Data System; Cleanup
Information Bulletin Board System (CLU-IN); Cost of Remedi-
al Action (CORA) Mode); Defense Environmental Electronic
Bulletin Board System (DEEBBS); Defense RDT&E Online
System (DROLS); Energy Science and Technology Data
Base; Environmental Technical Information System (ETIS);
Environmental Technologies Remedial Actions Data Ex-
change (EnviroTRADE); Environmental Technology Informa-
tion System (TIS); Hazardous Waste Superfund Collection
Data Base (HWSFD); Installation Restoration Data Manage-
ment Information System; National Technical Information
Service (NTIS) Bibliographic Data Base; New Technology
from DOE (NTD); Prospective Technology (ProTech) and the
Technology Catalogue; Records of Decision System (RODS);
ReOpt: Electronic Encyclopedia of Remedial Action Options;
Research in Progress (RIP) Data Base; RREL Treatability
Data Base; Soil Transport and Fate Data Base; Technology
Integration System Support (TISS); Vendor Information
System for Innovative Treatment Technologies (VISITT); and
Waste Management Information System.
Specifications: Supersedes PB93-145647. Sponsored by
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Technol-
ogy Innovation Office. 48p.
Subject index keywords: Waste management, Technology
innovation, Pollution control.
TECHNOLOGY POLICY &
ADMINISTRATION: Miscellaneous
Policy & Program Documents
1186 Abstract Proceedings: Forum on Innovative
Hazardous Waste Treatment Technologies; Domestic
and International (2nd). Held in Philadelphia,
Pennsylvania on May 15-17, 1990
Order Number PB91-145649CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 90
Contents: Physical Chemical Treatment Methods; Thermal
Treatment; Biological Treatment; Solidification/Stabilization
Treatment; and Poster Presentations.
Specifications: Also available from Supt. of Docs. 65p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste treat-
ment, Meetings.
1187 Abstract Proceedings: Superfund Technical Support
Project General Meeting. Held in Athens, Georgia on
December 3-6, 1990
Order Number PB93-205862CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Management Support, Silver Spring, MD.;
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; May 91
Contents: RCRA's New Ground-Water Monitoring Regula-
tions; Remedial Response Construction Cost Estimating
System (RACES); The Data Base Analyzer and Parameter
Estimator (DBAPE); Superfund Technical Liaison Program;
Causes and Effects of Well Turbidity; Characterizing Hetero-
geneous Hazardous Wastes; Superfund Innovative Technolo-
gy Evaluation (SITE) Program; Computer-Aided Assessment
of Contaminated Sites; Remedy Screening; New Engineering
Forum Issue Papers; Fourier Transform Infrared Spectrosco-
py (FT-IR); Metal Partitioning From Incineration of Soils and
Debris; Treatability Assistance Program Update; Data Gaps
in Remedial Design; The Pre-Design Technical Summary;
Remedial Design Schedule Management; Fate Constants
and Pathway Analysis; Identification of non-Target Analytes;
Dense Non-Aqueous Phase Liquids; MINTEQA2 Geochemi-
cal Equilibrium Model; Corps of Engineers Laboratory Sup-
port to EPA Regions; Subsurface Characterization and Mobi-
lization Processes (SCAMP); Overview of Athens' Modeling
Capabilities; Predicting Chemical Reactivity by Computer; Ra-
diation Technical Support to Regional Superfund Programs;
Design of Groundwater Monitoring Networks.
Specifications: See also PB92-205657. Sponsored by Envi-
ronmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response. 40p.
Subject index keywords: Meetings, Superfund, Waste man-
agement, Water pollution, Hazardous materials.
222
-------
TECHNOLOGY POLICY & ADMINISTRATION:
Miscellaneous Policy & Program Documents
1188 Accessing Federal Data Bases for Contaminated
Site Clean-Up Technologies
Order Number PB91-921288CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; May 91
The document is a reference tool that provides information
on those systems maintaining data on remedial technologies.
It may be used by Project Managers as a pointer to reposi-
tories of technical information, or as a source of contacts
that may be useful to future system design. Each data base
profile contains information on specific data elements,
system uses, hardware and software requirements, and
access. The profiles also include Agency contacts for each
system should more detailed information be required.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 29p.
Subject index keywords: Sites, Hazardous materials, Data
aquisition, Pollution control, Superfund.
1189 Accessing Federal Data Bases for Contaminated
Site Clean-Up Technologies (Second Edition)
Order Number PB93-145647CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
Federal Remediation Technologies Roundtable.;
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC.
Technology Innovation Office; Aug 92
The Federal Remediation Technologies Roundtable devel-
oped this publication to provide information on accessing
Federal data bases that contain data on innovative remedi-
ation technologies. This document updates and expands in-
formation presented in the first edition published in 1991.
This document is a reference too! that provides information
on those systems maintaining data on remedial technologies.
It may be used by project managers as a pointer to reposi-
tories of technical information, or as a source of contacts
that may be useful to future system design. Each data base
profile contains information on data elements, system uses,
hardware and software requirements, and access. The pro-
files also contain contacts for each system. A matrix showing
system characteristics of the data bases included in this doc-
ument is provided.
Specifications: See also PB91-921288. Sponsored by Envi-
ronmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Technology
Innovation Office. 52p.
Subject index keywords: Remedial action, Technology in-
novation, Information systems, Waste management, Data
bases, Cleanup operations.
1190 Accutech Pneumatic Fracturing Extraction and Hot
Gas Injection, Phase 1. Applications Analysis Report
Order Number PB94-117439CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
Science Applications International Corp., Hackensack, NJ.;
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Mar 93
The report summarizes and analyzes the SITE demonstration
of Accutech's Pneumatic Fracturing Extraction (PFE) process
at an industrial park in NJ. Based on the results of 4-hr tests
before and after fracturing, extracted air flow rate increased
an average 600% and trichloroethene (TCE) mass removal
rate increased about 675%, primarily due to the increased air
flow. The radius for effective vapor extraction also is en-
larged by fracturing; extracted air flow rates increased 700%
to 1,400% in wells at a 10 ft radius and 200% to 1,100% in
wells 20 ft from the fracture well. With passive air inlets, the
extracted air flow rate increased about 19,500%, and TCE
mass removal rate increased 2,300%. The estimated cost for
full-scale remediation of the site with PFE was $307/kg
($140/lb) of TCE removed based on the SITE demonstration
experience and information provided by the developer. Major
contributing factors were: Labor (29%); Capital Equipment
(22); and Emissions Collection/disposal (19%). Numerous
assumptions were used in arriving at this cost. Results of two
Hot Gas Injection (HGI) tests were inconclusive.
Specifications: Sponsored by Environmental Protection
Agency, Washington, DC. Office of Emergency and Remedial
Response. 59p.
Subject index keywords: Pneumatic fracturing extraction,
Gas injection, Superfund, Trichloroethylene, Superfund Inno-
.vative Technology Evaluation.
1191 Advancing the Use of Treatment Technologies for
Superfund Remedies
Order Number PB90-272659CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; 21 Feb 89
.The directive reaffirms the use of treatment technologies at
Superfund sites and summarizes guidance documents and
activities that encourage and support the use of innovative
treatment technologies.
Specifications: 10p.
Subject index .keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste treat-
ment, Superfund, Waste management, Office of Solid Waste
and Emergency Response, Remedial action.
1192 Alternating Current Electrocoagulation for
Superfund Site Remediation
Order Number PB93-205144CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Electro-Pure Systems, Inc., Amherst, NY.; Environmental
Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk Reduction
Engineering Lab; c1993
The technical and economical feasibility of alternating current
electrocoagulation (ACE) was evaluated for a 2-year period.
ACE is an electrochemical technology where highly-charged
aluminum polyhydroxide species are introduced into aqueous
media for the removal of suspended solids, oil droplets, and
soluble ionic pollutants. ACE can break stable aqueous col-
loidal suspensions of up to 10% total solids and stable emul-
sions containing up to 5% oil. Major • operating parameters
have been defined for different classes of effluents based on
experimental results using complex synthetic soil slurries and
metals. Test results indicate that ACE produces aqueous and
solid separations comparable to those produced by chemical
flocculent additions, but with reduced filtration times and
sludge volumes. The technology has application where re-
moval of soluble and suspended pollutants from effluents is
required, and in the recovery of fine-grained products from
process streams. The technology however, has not yet been
demonstrated at full-scale for Superfund site remediation.
Summarized are the principal results of the SITE research
program and results of ACE treatment on some different
classes of industrial effluents, not part of the SITE Program.
Specifications: Pub. in Jnl. of Air and Waste Management
Association, 1993. See also PB-143 652. Sponsored by Envi-
ronmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk Reduction
Engineering Lab. 8p.
223
-------
TECHNOLOGY POLICY & ADMINISTRATION:
Miscellaneous Policy & Program Documents
Subject Index keywords: Electrocoagulation, Hazardous
materials, Waste treatment.
1193 American Combustion Pyretron Destruction System.
Applications Analysis Report
Order Number PB90-258427CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
Acurex Corp., Jefferson, AR.; Environmental Protection
Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk Reduction Engineering Lab; Jun
89
The report analyzes American Combustion's Pyretron oxygen
enhanced burner system. The report discusses information
on the economical advantages of this type of incineration for
use in assessments at uncontrolled hazardous waste sites.
Specifications: See also PB89-167894. Sponsored by Envi-
ronmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk Reduction
Engineering Lab. 54p.
Subject index keywords: Incinerators, Waste disposal, Haz-
ardous materials, Kilns, Superfund program, Remedial action.
1194 Application of a Plant Test System in the
Identification of Potential Genetic Hazards at Chemical
Waste Sites
Order Number PB92-124551CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Health Effects Research Lab., Research Triangle Park, NC.
Genetic Toxicology Div. Environmental Health Research and
Testing, Inc., Research Triangle Park, NC; 1991
The authors utilized the Tradescantia micronucleus (Trad-
MCN) assay for evaluating genetic hazards at a chemical
waste site contaminated with agricultural insecticides sched-
uled for clean-up under the Superfund program. The chemi-
cal analysis of soil samples from the site indicates presence
of lindane (17 mg/kg), beta BHC (13 mg/kg), and heptachlor
(0.4 mg/kg) in the subsurface sample. Tradescantia plants
were planted at five locations to evaluate the mutagenic ef-
fects of the total environment, i.e., soil, water, and air. In ad-
dition, stem cuttings were also placed at these locations to
sample the genetic impact of vapor phase organics in the at-
mosphere. The surface and subsurface samples were ob-
tained from these locations for their chemical and biological
analysis in the laboratory. The results of the Tradescantia
planted on the site, as well as the stem cuttings exposed on
the test site, showed significantly higher frequencies of mi-
cronuclei from contaminated plots before remediation; but no
genetic activity was detected after the remedial action. The
plants exposed to the soil samples in the laboratory yielded
nonsignificant results except for one subsurface sample
before remediation and two surface samples after remedi-
ation.
Specifications: Pub. in American Society for Testing and
Materials - Plants for Toxicity Assessment: Philadelphia, PA.,
pp309-317 1991. Prepared in cooperation with Environmental
Health Research and Testing, Inc., Research Triangle Park,
NC. 11 p.
Subject index keywords: Toxicity, Mutagens,
Plants(Botany), Chemical waste sites.
1195 Application of Tradescantia Micronucleus Assay for
In situ Evaluation of Potential Genetic Hazards from
Exposure to Chemicals at a Wood-Preserving Site
Order Number PB92-217231 CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Health Effects Research Lab., Research Triangle Park, NC.
Genetic Toxicology Div. Environmental Health Research and
Testing, Inc., Research Triangle Park, NC; c1991
In situ evaluation of biological hazards from wood preserving
chemicals at a hazardous waste site using the Tradescantia
micronucleus assay (Trad-MCN) is reported in the study. The
chemical analysis of soil samples from the site showed high
contamination with arsenic (1,292 mg/kg), chromium (1,444
mg/kg) and copper (924 mg/kg) on the surface of the drip
area where wood was allowed to dry after the treatment. Ex-
posure of Tradescantia plants grown within or adjacent to
the drip area showed significantly (P=0.05) higher frequen-
cies of micronuclei when compared to plants grown in
nearby control plots. After remediation, the levels of arsenic,
chromium, and copper were substantially reduced and con-
comitantly no genotoxic activity was observed in plants
grown on-site or in plants exposed in the laboratory to a
slurry of soil samples from the site. The results from the pilot
study show that simple plant assays such as Trad-MCN can
be used as a sentinel for environmental contamination and
to assess the efficacy of clean-up efforts.
Specifications: Pub. in Hazardous Waste and Hazardous
Materials, v8 n3 p257-262 Sep 91. Prepared in cooperation
with Environmental Health Research and Testing, Inc., Re-
search Triangle Park, NC. 8p.
Subject index keywords: Wood preservatives, Superfund,
Waste disposal, Biological effects, Bioassay, Hazardous ma-
terials.
1196 Applications Analysis Report: SITE Program, CF
Systems Organics Extraction System, New Bedford,
Massachusetts
Order Number PB91-113845CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
Science Applications International Corp., McLean, VA.;
Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk
Reduction Engineering Lab; Aug 90
The report summarizes the results of a Superfund Innovative
Technology Evaluation (SITE) demonstration of the CF Sys-
tems critical fluid organics extraction system at the New Bed-
ford Harbor, Mass., Superfund site. It also provides a review
of those conditions which this technology is best suited for,
as well as comments by CF Systems Corp. The technology
depends on the ability of organic pollutants to solubilize in
the process solvent, a liquified gas. The pollutants treated in-
clude polychlorinated biphenyls (PCB's) and polynuclear aro-
matic hydrocarbons.
Specifications: Sponsored by Environmental Protection
Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk Reduction Engineering Lab.
74p.
Subject index keywords: Organic compounds, Hazardous
materials, Extraction, New Bedford Harbor, Superfund.
224
-------
TECHNOLOGY POLICY & ADMINISTRATION;
Miscellaneous Policy & Program Documents
1197 Assessment of International Technologies for
Superfund Applications: Technology Review and Trip
Report Results
Order Number PB90-106428CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
Alliance Technologies Corp., Bedford, MA.; Environmental
Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of Solid Waste
and Emergency Response; Sep 88
Several international technologies were identified and investi-
gated for their applicability to hazardous waste site remedi-
ation in the United States. The field team visited with twelve
research groups, consultants and manufacturers at 15 loca-
tions in The Netherlands, Belgium and the Federal Republic
of Germany (FRG). Results of the individual site visits are
summarized and a capsule summary of each technology in-
cludes a brief process description, discussion of process limi-
tations, performance data, costs, and status of process de-
velopment. Identified were site cleanup technologies not cur-
rently used in the U.S., as well as unique applications of
techniques used in the U.S. Among the most important find-
ings were five different soil washing techniques in Holland
, and the the FRG. Another key finding was the High Temper-
ature Slagging Incinerator technology reviewed in Belgium. In
addition, the field team reviewed unique applications of in
situ biological treatment and composting techniques, vacuum
extraction and in situ air stripping, in situ extraction of cadmi-
um from soils, application of rotating biological contractors,
and electrochemical dehalogenation techniques.
Specifications: See also PB89-205959. Sponsored by Envi-
ronmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response. 53p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Technology
assessment, Waste disposal, Foreign technology, Superfund
program, Remedial action, Environmental research.
1198 Assessment of Technologies for the Remediation of
Radioactively Contaminated Superfund Sites
Order Number PB90-204140CDH, price: PC A06/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Jan 90
The report is a screening evaluation of information needs for
the development of generic treatability studies for the reme-
diation of Superfund Radiation Sites on the National Priorities
List (NPL). It presents a categorization of the 25 radiation
sites currently proposed or listed on the NPL, and provides a
rating system for evaluating technologies that may be used
to remediate these sites. It also identifies gaps in site as-
sessment and technology data and provides information
about and recommendations for technology development.
Specifications: 116p.
Subject index keywords: Radioactive wastes, Hazardous
materials, Waste disposal, Superfund program.
1199 Assessment of Tentatively Identified Compounds in
Superfund Samples
Order Number PB90-253816CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Research Lab., Athens, GA; Jun 90
Stored mass spectral data for 27 semivolatile samples ana-
lyzed by 7 private laboratories under contract with the U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency were reanalyzed at the En-
vironmental Research Laboratory, Athens, GA (AERL). Re-
sults of the reanalysis were compared with the original con-
tract laboratory data. In instances where specific compound
identifications had been made by a contract laboratory,
AERL identifications agreed 36% of the time, disagreed with
the identification 11 % of the time, disagreed on the presence
of the GC peak 19% of the time, or concluded that data
were insufficient for identification 34% of the time.
Specifications: 9p.
Subject index keywords: Site surveys, Hazardous materi-
als, Chemical analysis, Waste disposal, Superfund, Tentative-
ly identified compounds.
1200 Asymmetric Loss Function for Superfund
Remediation Decisions
Order Number PB93-106763CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Monitoring Systems Lab., Las Vegas, NV;
1992
At a Superfund remediation site the decision is a classifica-
tion problem, discriminating between polluted blocks to be
remediated and background blocks to be left untreated. The
concentration of the pollutant in a block is estimated from
sampling. The more samples taken the better the estimates,
but what is the optimum sample size. The errors are comput-
ed by subtracting the estimate from the block averages of an
exhaustive sampling. The time-honored least squares algo-
rithm is the obvious way to evaluate a given sample size, but
least squares assumes a symmetric loss function. Superfund
remediation has an asymmetric cost-plus-loss function; false
positives (clean blocks judged dirty) have a relatively small
fixed cost while false negative (polluted blocks judged clean)
have public-health-losses that increase with concentration.
Minimizing an asymmetric cost-plus-loss function will find a
different optimum sample size than would the traditional least
squares approach.
Specifications: See also PB90-155581. 8p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Remedial action, Envi-
ronmental monitoring, Sampling, Waste management, Loss
function.
1201 AutoMOUSE: An Improvement to the MOUSE
Computerized Uncertainty Analysis System Operational
Manual
Order Number PB93-100113CDH, price: PC A10/MF A03
Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk
Reduction Engineering Lab; Aug 92
Under a mandate of national environmental laws, the agency
strives to formulate and implement actions leading to a com-
patible balance between human activities and the ability of
natural systems to support and nurture life. The Risk Reduc-
tion Engineering Laboratory is responsible for planning, im-
plementing, and managing research development, and dem-
onstration programs to provide an authoritative, defensible
engineering basis in support of the policies, programs, and
regulations of the EPA with respect to drinking water,
wastewater, pesticides, toxic substances, solid and hazard-
ous wastes, and Superfund-related activities. The publication
is one of the products of that research and provides a vital
communication link between the researcher and the user
community. The manual describes a system, called MOUSE
(for Modular Oriented Uncertainty SystEm), for dealing with
the computational problems of uncertainty, specifically in
models that consist of a set of one or more equations. Since
such models are frequently encountered in the fields of envi-
ronmental science, risk analysis, economics, and engineer-
ing, the system has broad application throughout these
fields. An important part of the MOUSE system is Auto-
MOUSE which actually writes the computer programs re-
225
-------
TECHNOLOGY POLICY & ADMINISTRATION:
Miscellaneous Policy & Program Documents
quired for the uncertainty analysis computations. Thus, no
prior programming knowledge is needed to learn or use
MOUSE and, because of its transportability and compact-
ness, the system can be run on a wide variety of personal
computers available to the U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency and/or its contractors and grantees.
Specifications: For system on diskette, see PB93-500007.
21 Op.
Subject index keywords: Environmental impact assess-
ments, Environmental engineering, Risk assessment, User
manuals(Computer programs), AutoMOUSE system, Modular
Oriented Uncertainty System.
1202 AWD Technologies Integrated AquaDetox (Trade
Name)/SVE Technology: Applications Analysis Report
Order Number PB92-218379CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk
Reduction Engineering Lab; Oct 91
In support of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's
(EPA) Superfund Innovative Technology Evaluation (SITE)
Program, the report evaluates the AWD Technologies, Inc.,
integrated AquaDetox/SVE treatment system for simultane-
ous on-site treatment of contaminated groundwater and soil-
gas. The AWD technology uses an AquaDetox moderate
vacuum steam stripping system to treat contaminated
groundwater and a soil vapor extraction (SVE) system that
uses granular activated carbon (GAG) beds to treat soil-gas.
The t^vo systems are looped together to form a closed
system with no emissions. The report evaluates both the
treatment efficiency and economic data based on results
from the SITE demonstrated and describes several case
studies,
Specifications: See also PB92-124387. 68p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
Land pollution control, Water pollution control, Hazardous
materials, AquaDetox/SVE treatment system.
1203 Babcock and Wilcox Cyclone Furnace Vitrification.
Technology Demonstration Summary
Order Number PB93-145621CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk
Reduction Engineering Lab; Sep 92
A Superfund Innovative Technology Evaluation (SITE) Dem-
onstration of the Babcock and Wilcox Cyclone Furnace Vitri-
fication Technology was conducted in November 1991. This
Demonstration occurred at the Babcock and Wilcox (B and
W) Alliance Research Center (ARC) in Alliance, OH. The B
and W cyclone furnace may be used for thermal treatment of
soils contaminated with organics, metals, and radionuclides.
The cyclone furnace is designed to destroy organic contami-
nants and to immobilize metals and radionuclides in a vitri-
fied soil matrix (slag).
Specifications: See also PB92-222215, PB92-222223, and
PB93-122315. 8p.
Subject index keywords: Technology innovation, Soil treat-
ment, Hazardous materials, Vitrification, Radioactive materi-
als, Superfund Innovative Technology Evaluation Program, B
and W cyclone furnace.
1204 Behavior of Arsenic in a Rotary Kiln Incinerator
(Journal Version)
Order Number PB92-179845CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Acurex Corp., Jefferson, AR.; Environmental Protection
Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk Reduction Engineering Lab;
C1992
ii
A series of pilot scale incineration tests were performed at
EPA's Incineration Researcfi Facility (IRF) to evaluate the
fate of arsenic when fed to a rotary kiln incinerator. In addi-
tion to parametric tests, an arsenic-containing soil from a Su-
perfund site was also fed to the same incinerator. The oper-
ation of the incinerator and the resulting test conditions were
similar. The data showed that arsenic when incinerated tends
to partition to the bottom ash. However, as the temperature
in the kiln rises, the amount of arsenic partitioning to the ash
decreases. With regard to the Superfund soil, the TCLP
values for arsenic went down as the oxygen level in the kiln
increased. Afterburner temperature and chlorine concentra-
tion in the waste did not appear to have any effect on the
partitioning of arsenic.
Specifications: Pub. in Jnl. of Air and Waste Management
Association, v42 n2 p179-184 Feb 92. See also PB91-
131656. Sponsored by Environmental Protection Agency,
Cincinnati, OH. Risk Reduction Engineering Lab. 8p.
Subject index keywords: Arsenic, Waste disposal, Inciner-
ators.
1205 BEN: A Model to Calculate the Economic Benefits of
Noncompliance. User's Manual (Revised)
Order Number PB94-141652CDH, price: PC A10/MF A03
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Enforcement; Dec 93
The manual is to be used with the BEN computer model
which calculates the economic benefit a violator derives from
delaying or avoiding compliance with environmental statutes.
In general, EPA uses the BEN computer model to assist its
staff in developing settlement penalty figures. While the pri-
mary purpose of the BEN model is to calculate the after tax
net present value of a pollution prevention or mitigation
project and to calculate 'cash outs' in Superfund cases.
Specifications: Supersedes PB92-230358. 201 p.
Subject index keywords: Pollution abatement, Superfund,
Benefit cost analysis.
1206 Bibliography of Federal Reports and Publications
Describing Alternative and Innovative Treatment
Technologies for Corrective Action and Site
Remediation
Order Number PB91-921293CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; May 91
The Federal Remediation Technologies Roundtable devel-
oped this bibliography to publicize the accessibility of Federal
documents pertaining to innovative and alternative technol-
ogies to treat hazardous wastes. The bibliography contains
references for documents and reports from the U.S. Environ-
mental Protection Agency (EPA), the U.S. Army, the U.S.
Army Corps of Engineers, the U.S. Navy, the U.S. Air Force,
the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), and the U.S. Depart-
ment of Interior (DOI), Bureau of Reclamation. The publica-
tion contains references and| order information for reports on
research concerning the application of innovative and alter-
226
-------
TECHNOLOGY POLICY & ADMINISTRATION:
Miscellaneous Policy & Program Documents
native hazardous waste treatment options. The bibliography
is scheduled to undergo periodic revisions.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 29p.
Subject index keywords: Sites, Hazardous materials, Re-
search management, Bibliographies.
1207 Carver-Greenfield Process (Trade Name) Dehydro-
Tech Corporation. Applications Analysis Report
Order Number PB93-101152CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
PRC Environmental Management, Inc., Cincinnati, OH.;
Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk
Reduction Engineering Lab; Sep 92
The report evaluates the Dehydro-Tech Corporation's
Carver-Greenfield (C-G) Process and focuses on the technol-
ogy's ability to separate waste mixtures into their constituent
solid, organic and water fractions while producing a solid re-
sidual that meets applicable disposal requirements. The
report presents performance and economic data from the
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Superfund Innovative
Technology Evaluation (SITE) demonstration and three case
studies. The C-G Process demonstration was conducted as a
part of the SITE Program at the Risk Reduction Engineering
Laboratory's Releases Control Branch facility in Edison, New
Jersey, using drilling mud waste from the PAB Oil Superfund
site jn Abbeville, Louisiana. The system generated a treated
solids product that passed Toxicity Characteristic Leaching
Procedure (TCLP) criteria for volatiles, semivolatiles and
metals. Potential wastes that might be treated by the tech-
nology include industrial residues, Resource Conservation
and Recovery Act wastes, Superfund wastes and other
•wastes contaminated with organic compounds. Economic
analyses indicate that the cost of using the C-G process is
about $523/ton of which $302 is for site-specific expenses.
Specifications: See also PB92-217462. Sponsored by Envi-
ronmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk Reduction
Engineering Lab. 49p.
Subject index keywords: Waste treatment, Separation
processes, Solvent extraction, Hazardous materials, Innova-
tive treatment technologies, Carver-Greenfield process.
1208 CASHOUT Model: Calculates Current Value of
Superfund Cleanup Costs (Version 1.2) (for
Microcomputers)
Order Number PB94-501012CDH, price: D02
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Enforcement; Dec 93
CASHOUT determines in current year dollars what all the
future clean-up costs of a Superfund site will be. Since those
costs could be as much as 50 years in the future, this allows
the enforcement professionals in the Superfund program to
quickly determine what the total current cost of a clean-up
would be. Then they can use that number to 'cashout' of the
case the small contributors. The small contributors just pay
an appropriate portion of the CASHOUT number, and then
they are out of the case. The other contributors usually are
responsible for the site for a substantial amount of time.
Specifications: The software is on one 3 1/2 inch diskette,
720K double density. Documentation included; may be or-
dered separately as PB94-141678. Software valid through
August 1994 when an updated issue will be released.
System: DOS operating system. Requires 69K of hard drive
space. 1 diskette.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Costs, Software.
1209 Chemical Dehalogenation Treatabiiity Studies under
CERCLA: An Overview
Order Number PB92-169275CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
IT Corp., Sharonville, OH.; Environmental Protection Agency,
Cincinnati, OH. Risk Reduction Engineering Lab; May 92
Systematically conducted, well-documented treatability stud-
ies are an important component of remedy evaluation and
selection under the Superfund program. The fact sheet fo-
cuses on chemical dehalogenation treatability studies con-
ducted in support of remedy selection that is conducted prior
to the Record of Decision (ROD). The fact sheet presents a
standard guide for designing and implementing a chemical
dehalogenation treatability study. The manual presents a de-
scription of and discusses the applicability and limitations of
chemical dehalogenation technologies and defines the pre-
screening and field measurement data needed to determine
if treatability testing is required. It also presents an overview
of the process of conducting treatability tests and the appli-
cability of tiered treatability testing for evaluation of chemical
dehalogenation technologies. The specific goals of each tier
of testing are defined and performance levels are presented
that should be met at the remedy screening level before ad-
ditional tests are conducted at the next tier. The elements of
a treatability study work plan are also defined with detailed
discussions on the design and execution of the treatability
study.
Specifications: See also PB92-169044. Sponsored by Envi-
ronmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk Reduction
Engineering Lab. 10p.
Subject index keywords: Waste management, Environmen-
tal surveys, Hazardous materials, Superfund, Office of Solid
Waste and Emergency Response.
1210 Chemical Dehalogenation Treatment: APEG
Treatment
Order Number PB91-228031CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Science Applications International Corp., Cincinnati, OH.;
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 90
The chemical dehalogenation system discussed in the report
is alkaline metal hydroxide/polyethylene glycol (APEG) which
is applicable to aromatic halogenated compounds. The metal
hydroxide that has been most widely used for this reagent
preparation is potassium hydroxide (KOH) in conjunction with
polyethylene glycol (PEG) (typically, average molecular
weight of 400 Daltons) to form a polymeric alkoxide referred
to as KPEG. However, sodium hydroxide has also been used
in the past and most likely will find increasing use in the
future because of patent applications that have been filed for
modification to this technology. This new approach will
expand the technology's applicability and efficacy and should
reduce chemical costs by facilitating the use of less costly
sodium hydroxide. A variation of this reagent is the use of
potassium hydroxide or sodium hydroxide/tetraethylene
glycol, referred to as ATEG, that is more effective on haloge-
nated aliphatic compounds. In some KPEG reagent formula-
tions, dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) is added to enhance reac-
tion rate kinetics, presumably by improving rates of extraction
of the haloaromatic contaminants. Previously developed de-
227
-------
TECHNOLOGY POLICY & ADMINISTRATION:
Miscellaneous Policy & Program Documents
halogenation reagents involved dispersion of metallic sodium
In oil or the use of highly reactive organosodium compounds.
The reactivity of metallic sodium and these other reagents
with water presented a serious limitation to treating many
waste matrices; therefore, these other reagents are not dis-
cussed in this bulletin and are not considered APEG proc-
esses.
Specifications: Sponsored by Environmental Protection
Agency, Washington, DC. Office of Emergency and Remedial
Response. 8p.
Subject Index keywords: Waste treatment, Dehalogenation,
Aromatic compounds, Halogen organic compounds, Chemi-
cal treatment
1211 Chemical Oxidation Treatment. Engineering Bulletin
Order Number PB92-180066CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Oct 91
Oxidation destroys hazardous contaminants by chemically
converting them to nonhazardous or less toxic compounds
that are ideally more stable, less mobile, and/or inert. How-
ever, under some conditions, other hazardous compounds
may be formed. The oxidizing agents most commonly used
for the treatment of hazardous contaminants are ozone, hy-
drogen peroxide, hypochlorites, chlorine, and chlorine diox-
ide. Current research has shown the combination of these
reagents or ultraviolet (UV) light and an oxidizing agent(s)
makes the process more effective. Treatability studies are
necessary to document the applicability and performance of
chemical oxidation systems technology for a specific site.
The bulletin provides information on the technology applica-
bility, limitations, a technology description, the types of re-
siduals produced, site requirements, current performance
data, status of the technology, and sources of further infor-
mation.
Specifications: See also PB90-198177. 10p.
Subject index keywords: Oxidation, Waste treatment, Haz-
ardous materials, Remedial action, Water pollution control,
Superfund, Chemical treatment.
,:' ' ' ij'ii , '•«!
1212 Chemical Stabilization of Mixed Organic and Metal
Compounds. EPA SITE Program Demonstration of the
Silicate Technology Corporation Process
Order Number PB93-131787CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk
Reduction Engineering Lab; c1992
In November 1990, the Silicate Technology Corporation's
(STC) proprietary process for treating soil contaminated with
toxic semivolatile organic and inorganic contaminants was
evaluated in a Superfund Innovative Technology Evaluation
(SITE) field demonstration at the Selma Pressure Treatment
(SPT) wood preserving site in Selma, California. The SPT site
was contaminated principally with pentachlorophenol (PCP)
and arsenic, as well as jesser amounts of chromium and
copper. Because of their importance when selecting a
remedy for the site, PCP and arsenic were identified as criti-
cal analytes to evaluate the effectiveness of treatment.
(Copyright (c) 1992 Air & Waste Management Association.)
Specifications: Pub. in Jnl. of the Air and Waste Manage-
ment Association, v42 n5 p724-728 May 92. 7p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Soil treatment, Reme-
dial action, Wood preservatives, Waste treatment, Innovative
treatment technologies.
1213 Chemical Waste Management, Inc. PO*WW*ER
(Trade Name) Evaporation-Catalytic Oxidation
Technology. Technology Evaluation Report. Volume 1
Order Number PB94-160637CDH, price: PC A08/MF A02
PRC Environmental Management, Inc., Chicago, IL;
Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk
Reduction Engineering Lab; Sep 92
As part of the Superfund Innovative Technology Evaluation
(SITE) Program, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
(EPA) demonstrated the Chemical Waste Management, Inc.
(CWM), PO*WW*ER(tm) technology. The SITE demonstra-
tion was conducted in September 1992 at CWM's Lake
Charles Treatment Center (LCTC) site in Lake Charles, Lou-
isiana. During the demonstration, the PO*WW*ER(tm)
system treated landfill leachate contaminated with volatile or-
ganic compounds (VOC), semivolatile organic compounds
(SVOC), metals, ammonia, cyanide, and other inorganic con-
taminants. SITE demonstration results show that during treat-
ment in the PO*WW*ER(tm) system, the volume of the land-
fill leachate was significantly reduced. A total solids (TS) con-
centration ratio of 32 to 1 was achieved. The SITE demon-
stration results also show that the PO*WW*ER(tm) system
effectively removed sources of toxicity such as VOCs,
SVOCs, metals, ammonia, and cyanide. Concentrations of
VOCs and SVOCs in product condensate exiting the
PO*WW*ER(tm) system were below their respective detec-
tion limits of 5 to 10 micrograms per liter (micrograms/L) and
10 to 130 micrograms/L.
Specifications: See also PB94-124658, PB91-127415 and
Volume 2, PB94-160660. Sponsored by Environmental Pro-
tection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk Reduction Engineering
Lab. 167p.
Subject index keywords: Chemical wastes, Superfund,
Waste treatment, Water pollution control, Liquid wastes,
PO*WW*ER System, Innovative treatment technologies.
1214 Chemical Waste Management, Inc. PO*WW*ER
(Trade Name) Evaporation-Catalytic Oxidation
Technology. Technology Evalution Report. Volume 2
Order Number PB94-160660CDH, price: PC A21/MF A04
PRC Environmental Management, Inc., Chicago, IL.;
Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk
Reduction Engineering Lab; Nov 93
The PRC SITE Team conducted sampling and analysis for
the SITE demonstration of the Chemical Waste Manage-
ment, Inc. (CWM) PO*WW*ER process at the Lake Charles
Treatment Center in Carlyss, Louisiana. Samples were col-
lected on September 24, 25, 26, 28, 29, and 30, 1992.
During the first three days of sampling, the PO*WW*ER
process operated with natural (unspiked) feed waste. For the
last three days of sampling, the feed waste was spiked with
sulfate salts of cadmium, copper, nickel, iron and mercury,
and with phenol, toluene, tetrachloroethene, and methylene
chloride. This report presents results and quality assurance/
quality control (QA/QC) data for samples analyzed by Engi-
neering-Science, Inc., along with vent gas emission rate and
volumetric concentration results calculated from Ross analyt-
ical data. Analytical results are presented in Section 2.0. QA/
QC results are presented in Section 3.0. Re-extraction and
reanalysis results for brine samples are presented and dis-
cussed in Section 4.0. Appendix A contains chain of custody
forms associated with the samples, and Appendix B contains
a key to sample identification.
228
-------
TECHNOLOGY POLICY & ADMINISTRATION:
Miscellaneous Policy & Program Documents
Specifications: See also Volume 1, PB94-160637. Spon-
sored by Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH.
Risk Reduction Engineering Lab. 500p.
Subject index keywords: Chemical wastes, Superfund,
Waste treatment, Liquid wastes, Water pollution sampling,
PO*WW*ER System, Innovative treatment technologies.
1215 Cleanup Information Bulletin Board System Users
Guide. (CLU-IN: Cleanup Information Bulletin Board)
Order Number PB93-194025CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Feb 93
The Cleanup Information (CLU-IN) Bulletin Board System
(BBS) is designed for hazardous waste cleanup professionals
to use for finding information about innovative technologies,
consulting with one another online, and accessing data-
bases. CLU-IN is used by those involved in the cleanup of
Superfund and Resource Conservation and Recovery Act
corrective action sites, including EPA, other Federal Agency
and State personnel, consulting engineers, technology ven-
dors, remediation contractors, researchers, community
groups, and individual citizens.
Specifications: 36p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Cleanup,
Data acquisition, Telecommunications, Superfund.
1216 Comparison of a Revised Area Source Algorithm for
the Industrial Source Complex Short Term Model and
Wind Tunnel Data
Order Number PB93-226751CDH, price: PC A08/MF A02
Pacific Environmental Services, Inc., Research Triangle Park,
NC.; Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle
Park, NC. Technical Support Div; Oct 92
The report summarizes the results of comparison between a
new numerical integration algorithm for modeling area source
dispersion, as implemented in the Industrial Source Complex
Short Term (ISCST2) model using wind tunnel data collected
in the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's Fluid Modeling
Facility. Area sources referred to can be characterized as
low level releases with little buoyance due to either momen-
tum or temperature such as landfills or lagoons that are com-
monly found at superfund sites. The results of the analyses
show that the new ISCST2 area source algorithm predicts
the concentration distribution with relatively good accuracy,
especially for ground-level area sources. The conclusion
seems also valid for the various source shapes and orienta-
tions thus suggesting the ability of the model to accurately
depict the plume shape for complex source-receptor geome-
tries.
Specifications: See also PB93-226777 and PB92-232446.
Sponsored by Environmental Protection Agency, Research
Triangle Park, NC. Technical Support Div. 175p.
Subject index keywords: Air pollution dispersion, Algo-
rithms, Mathematical models.
1217 Comparison: Organic Emissions from Hazardous
Waste Incinerators versus the 1990 Toxics Release
Inventory Air Releases
Order Number PB92-206267CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk
Reduction Engineering Lab; cFeb 92
Incineration is often the preferred technology for disposing of
hazardous waste and remediating Superfund sites. The ef-
fective implementation of the technology is frequently imped-
ed by strong public opposition to hazardous waste inciner-
ation (HWI). One of the reasons cited for the opposition is
the perception that the emission of organics pose an unrea-
sonable threat to human health. While numerous risk assess-
ments for these facilities has demonstrated these risks are
very low, this has not totally allayed some of the concerns. In
order to put organic emissions in perspective, the mass of
these emissions from the incineration of hazardous waste
has been estimated using 'reasonable worst-case' assump-
tions and compared to the 1990 Toxics Release Inventory
(TRI) air releases. Comparisons were made for 15 carcino-
genic organic compounds and 17 non-carcinogenic organic
compounds. Ratios for all but one of these compound-specif-
ic HWI emissions to their corresponding TRI air releases
ranged from 0.0003% to 0.746%. The total mass emissions
(121.7 tons) of all 32 specific organics from HWIs was less
than 0.03% of the corresponding 1990 TRI air releases
(431,600 tons).
Specifications: Pub. in Jnl. of the Air and Waste Manage-
ment Association, V92-42.01 p1-15. See also PB85-129492,
PB87-228508, PB92-155381 and PB92-501816. Presented at
the Annual Meeting and Exhibition (85th), Kansas City, MO.,
June 21-26, 1992. 17p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Air pollution
sampling, Incineration, Organic compounds, Waste disposal.
1218 Computer Models Used to Support Cleanup
Decision-Making at Hazardous and Radioactive Waste
Sites
Order Number PB93-183333CDH, price: PC A06/MF A02
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Radiation and Indoor Air.; Department of Energy,
Washington, DC. Nuclear Regulatory Commission,
Washington, DC. Office of Nuclear Material Safety and
Safeguards; Mar 93
To identify computer models actually being used to support
decision-making at hazardous and radioactive waste sites,
EPA, DOE, and NRC jointly funded a study. The purpose was
to identify models being used for hazardous and radioactive
waste site assessment and describe and classify these
models. Approximately 550 surveys were mailed to people
engaged in cleanups at hazardous and radioactive waste
sites. Responses were received from 87. The respondents
identified 127 computer models used at EPA Superfund,
DOE and NRC sites. The models included multi-media
models, ground water models, air models, engineering
models, surface water models, geochemical models, and util-
ity models. The responses revealed that few models were
used across a large number of sites. In contrast, the results
suggested that most cleanup efforts employed site-specific
models.
Specifications: Prepared in cooperation with Department of
Energy, Washington, DC., and Nuclear Regulatory Commis-
sion, Washington, DC. Office of Nuclear Material Safety and
Safeguards. 113p.
Subjecf: index keywords: Hazardous materials, Radioactive
wastes, Computer programs.
229
-------
TECHNOLOGY POLICY & ADMINISTRATION:
Miscellaneous Policy & Program Documents
1219 Contingency Analysis Modeling for Superfund Sites
and Other Sources
Order Number PB93-169126CDH, price: PC A13/MF A03
Science Applications International Corp., Reston, VA.;
Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park,
NC. Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards; Jan 93
The report provides information on contingency modeling for
a wide range of different accidental release scenarios of haz-
ardous air pollutants that might take place at Superfund and
other sites. The scenarios are used to illustrate how atmos-
pheric dispersion models, including dense gas models,
should be applied. Particular emphasis is made on the input
data that is needed for proper applications of models. Flow
charts direct the user to specific sections where various sce-
narios are discussed. A check list of items that should be
discussed before running the model is provided. Several ex-
amples are provided to specifically show how to apply the
models so as to produce a credible analysis for a particular
release scenario.
Specifications: See also PB86-245248, PB89-134340 and
PB91-141820. Sponsored by Environmental Protection
Agency, Research Triangle Park, NC. Office of Air Quality
Planning and Standards. 291 p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Air pollution
control, Contingency planning, Waste management, Comput-
erized simulation.
1220 Control Technologies for Defunct lead Battery
Recycling Sites: Overview and Recent Developments.
Volume 3
Order Dumber PB92-1504.16CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Foster Wheeler Enviresponse, inc., Edison, NJ.;
Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk
Reduction Engineering Lab; 1992
At least 29 lead battery recycling sites are or have been
slated for Investigation and possible remediation under the
Superfund program. The paper condenses information re-
garding the characteristics and remediation of these sites.
The information provided includes: (1) description of oper-
ations commonly conducted, and wastes generated; (2) tech-
nologies implemented or selected for site remediation; (3)
case studies of treatability studies on common wastes; (4)
past experience regarding the recyclability of materials found
at the sites, and (5) profiles of potentially applicable innova-
tive treatment technologies.
Specifications: Presented in International Seminar on Bat-
tery Waste Management (3rd), Deerfield, FL, November 4-6,
1991, v3 p1-22. See also PB92-114537. Sponsored by Envi-
ronmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk Reduction
Engineering Lab. 25p.
Subject Index keywords: Waste management, Lead acid
batteries, Waste treatment, Superfund, Remedial action.
1221 Control Technologies for Remediation of
Contaminated Soil and Waste Deposits at Superfund
Lead Battery Recycling Sites
Order Number PB92-227388CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Foster Wheeler Enviresponse, Inc., Edison, NJ.;
Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk
Reduction Engineering Lab; c1992
The paper primarily addresses remediation of contaminated
soils and waste deposits at defunct lead-acid battery recy-
cling sites (LBRS) via immobilization and separation process-
es. Metallic lead and lead compounds are generally the prin-
cipal contaminants of concern in soils and waste deposits.
Other metals (e.g., cadmium, copper, arsenic, antimony, and
selenium) are often present at LBRS. The article is primarily
based on experience gained from: (1) Superfund site investi-
gation, removal, and remedial actions, and (2) development
and demonstration of control technologies under the Super-
fund Innovative Technology Evaluation (SITE) Program. The
primary remedial options for lead contaminated soils and
waste deposits include: (1) no action, (2) off-site disposal, (3)
containment, (4) immobilization, (5) separation with resource
recovery, and (6) separation without resource recovery.
Specifications: Pub. in Jnl. of the Air and Waste Manage-
ment Association, v42 n7 p970-980 Jul 92. Sponsored by
Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk Re-
duction Engineering Lab. 14p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Electric bat-
teries, Soils, Pollution control, Superfund.
1222 Control Technology: Estimating Innovative
Technology Costs for the SITE Program
Order Number PB91-163758CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk
Reduction Engineering Lab; c1990
The paper provides the reader with an overview of the cost
estimation approach employed by the Superfund Innovative
Technology Evaluation (SITE) Program. The paper identifies
4 areas of concern which confront the cost analyst as the
question of technology cost is considered. These concerns
are then addressed through a 5 part cost methodology sub-
sequently employed on all SITE technology demonstrations.
The final section of the paper review the cost data gathered
from the first nine technology demonstrations completed and
reported on.
Specifications: Pub. in Jnl. of the Air and Waste Manage-
ment Association, v40 n7 Jul 90. 7p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Cost estimates, Waste
treatment, Waste disposal, Hazardous materials, Superfund
Innovative Technology Evaluation Program.
1223 Control Technology: 1992 Update of U.S. EPA's
Superfund Innovative Technology Evaluation (SITE)
Emerging Technology Program
Order Number PB93-150159CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; c1992
The Superfund Innovative Technology Evaluation (SITE)
Emerging Technology Program (ETP) has encouraged and fi-
nancially supported further development of bench- and pilot-
scale testing and evaluation of innovative technologies suita-
ble for use at hazardous waste sites for five years. The ETP
was established under the Superfund Amendments and Re-
authorization Act (SARA) of 1986. The ETP complies with
the goal of the SITE Program to promote, accelerate and
make commercially available the development of alternative/
innovative treatment technologies for use at Superfund sites.
Technologies are submitted to the ETP through yearly solici-
tations for Preprosals. Facilities, equipment, data collection,
performance and development are monitored throughout the
project. The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) and the U.S.
Air Force (USAF) are participants in the ETP. DOE has co-
funded ETP projects since 1990 and the USAF since 1991. A
primary goal of the ETP is to move developed technologies
to the field-demonstration stage. Therefore, a developer may
230
-------
TECHNOLOGY POLICY & ADMINISTRATION:
Miscellaneous Policy & Program Documents
be considered for participation in the SITE Demonstration
Program provided performance in the ETP indicates the
technology is field-ready for demonstration and evaluation.
Specifications: Pub. in Jnl. of the Air and Waste Manage-
ment Association, v42 n12 p1644-1656 Dec 92. See also
PB92-224294. 14p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Technology
innovation, Waste management, Superfund Innovative Tech-
nology Evaluation Program, Innovative treatment technol-
ogies.
1224 Criteria for Choosing Indicator Species for
Ecological Risk Assessments at Superfund Sites (90-
6402)
Order Number PB91-204321CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
North Carolina Univ. at Chapel Hill. Dept. of Environmental
Sciences and Engineering.; Environmental Protection
Agency, Washington, DC. Office of Cooperative
Environmental Management; Dec 90
The purpose of the paper is to develop criteria for choosing
indicator species for ecological risk assessments at Super-
fund sites. The paper begins with an introduction of the indi-
cator species concept and a brief review of the indicator spe-
cies in terrestrial and aquatic environments. Criteria for
choosing species are then outlined and explained.
Specifications: Sponsored by Environmental Protection
Agency, Washington, DC. Office of Cooperative Environmen-
tal Management. 57p.
Subject index keywords: Risk assessment, Superfund,
Land pollution, Indicator species, Waste disposal, Water pol-
lution effects.
1225 CWM PO*WW*ER (Trade Name) Evaporation-
Catalytic Oxidation Technology: Applications Analysis
Report
Order Number PB94-124658CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk
Reduction Engineering Lab; Sep 93
This report evaluates the Chemical Waste Management, Inc.
(CWM), PO*WW*ER(TM) technology's ability to remove vola-
tile organic compounds (VOC), semivolatile organic com-
pounds (SVOC), ammonia, cyanide, metals, and other inor-
ganic contaminants from aqueous wastes. This evaluation is
based on treatment performance and cost data obtained
from the Superfund Innovative Technology Evaluation (SITE)
demonstration and 11 case studies conducted by CWM. The
PO*WW*ER(TM) system reduces the volume of an aqueous
waste and catalytically oxidizes volatile contaminants. The
PO*WW*ER(TM) system consists primarily of (1) an evapo-
rator that reduces influent wastewater volume, (2) a catalytic
oxidizer that oxidizes the volatile contaminants in the vapor
stream from the evaporator, (3) a scrubber that removes acid
gases formed during oxidation, and (4) a condenser that con-
denses the vapor stream leaving the scrubber. This report
also discusses the applicability of the PO*WW*ER(TM)
system based on compliance with regulatory requirements,
implementability, short-term impact, and long-term effective-
ness. In addition, factors influencing the technology's per-
formance in meeting these criteria and evaluation limitations
are discussed.
Specifications: 75p.
Subject index keywords: Liquid wastes, Waste treatment,
Hazardous materials, Superfund, Water pollution control,
PO*WW*ER system, Innovative treatment technologies.
1226 Demonstration of a Trial Excavation at the McColl
Superfund Site
Order Number PB93-100121CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
IT Corp., Cincinnati, OH.; Environmental Protection Agency,
Cincinnati, OH. Risk Reduction Engineering Lab; Oct 92
The project describes the trial excavation performed at the
McColl Hazardous Waste Site. Excavation at this site pre-
sents unique problems due to the high potential for release
of sulfur dioxide and volatile odorous compounds contained
in the waste. The excavation demonstration was used to
obtain information on the utilization of an enclosure and as-
sociated air treatment systems around the excavation to min-
imize air emissions and the use of foam vapor suppressants
to reduce emissions from the waste during excavation. In ad-
dition, information was obtained on processing the tar frac-
tion of this waste by mixing it with cement and fly ash. The
demonstration is documented in two reports: (1) a Technolo-
gy Evaluation Report describing the field activities and labo-
ratory results; and (2) this Applications Analysis Report,
which interprets the data and discusses the potential applica-
bility of the technology.
Specifications: See also PB92-226448. Sponsored by Envi-
ronmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk Reduction
Engineering Lab. 61 p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Hazardous materials,
Air pollution control, Remedial action, Waste treatment,
Fullerton(California).
1227 Demonstration of Hazardous Waste Site Treatment
Technologies
Order Number PB91-176909CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk
Reduction Engineering Lab; 1989
The SITE Program is intended to accelerate the use of new
and innovative treatment processes that provide permanent
control of hazardous waste as well as evaluate innovative
measurement and monitoring techniques and pursue an
active technology transfer program. Within the SITE Pro-
gram, the Demonstration Program and the Emerging Tech-
nology Program are responsible for alternative technology
development. The SITE Demonstration Program has as its
major thrust the documentation of reliable performance and
cost information for innovative alternative technologies. The
demonstration projects identify limitations of the technology,
the need for pre- or post-treatment of wastes, applicable
wastes and waste media, potential operating problems, and
the approximate cost of applying the technology.
Specifications: Pub. in Berlin Recycling Congress Proceed-
ings, Berlin, Germany, November 1989, p1-8. 10p.
Subject index keywords: Demonstration programs, Hazard-
ous materials, Waste treatment, Superfund Innovative Tech-
nology Evaluation.
231
-------
TECHNOLOGY POJJCY & ADMINISTRATION:
Miscellaneous Policy & Program Documents
1228 Demonstration of Microfiltration Technology
Order Number PB92-136936CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk
Reduction Engineering Lab.; PRC Environmental
Management, Inc., Chicago, IL; c1991
The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, under the Super-
fund Innovative Technology Evaluation (SITE) program in co-
operation with E.I. DuPont de Nemours and Company, Inc.
(DuPont) and the Oberlin Filter Company (Oberlin), undertook
a field demonstration project to evaluate microfiltration tech-
nology for removal of zinc and suspended solids from
wastewater. The microfiltration system utilized DuPont's
Tyvek T-980 membrane filter media in conjunction with the
Ofaerlin automatic pressure filter. The project was undertaken
at the Palmerton Zinc Superfund site in April, 1990. Analysis
of the treated filtrate indicated that the system removed pre-
cipitated zinc and other suspended solids at an efficiency
greater than 99.9 percent. (Copyright (c) 1991-Air and
Waste Management Association.)
Specifications: Pub. in Jnl. of Air and Waste Management,
v12 p1653-1657 Dec 91. See also PB92-119023. Prepared in
cooperation with PRC Environmental Management, Inc., Chi-
cago, IL. 7p.
Subject index keywords: Water pollution control, Super-
fund, Waste treatment, Liquid wastes, Land pollution control,
Microfiltration, DuPont/Oberlin Microfiltration Treatment
System.
1229 Demonstration of Waste Treatment Technologies
Order Number PB92.-179670CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk
Reduction Engineering Lab; 1991
The need for long-term, permanent treatment schemes as al-
ternatives to land disposal has been highlighted by legislation
such as the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments of the
Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) and the
Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization Act (SARA) of
1986, SARA directed the U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency to establish an 'Alternative or Innovative Treatment
Technology Research and Demonstration Program' to identi-
fy promising waste treatment technologies, assist with their
evaluation, and promote their use at Superfund sites. In re-
sponse to this directive the Superfund Innovative Technology
Evaluation (SITE) Program was formed. Twenty technology
demonstrations have been completed in the SITE Program to
date. Those completed within the past year include microfil-
tration (DuPont and the Oberlin Filter Company), waste exca-
vation and emissions control (EPA Region 9), integrated
vapor1 extraction and steam vacuum stripping (AWD Technol-
ogies), solidification of contaminated soil (Silicate Technology
Corporation), and flame reactor recovery of lead (Horsehead
Resource Development Company).
Specifications: Presented at the Engineering and Technolo-
gy Conference (1st) on Waste Management Technology,
Technology Transfer and Training, San Juan, PR., April 24-
26, 1991. See also PB90-216516. 7p.
Subject index keywords: Waste treatment, Hazardous ma-
terials, Remedial action, Superfund Innovative Technology
Evaluation Program.
1230 Demonstration Projects Under the U.S. EPA
Superfund Innovative Technology Evaluation Program
Order Number PB91-176891CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk
Reduction Engineering Lab; 1991
The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is engaged
in an initiative called the Superfund Innovative Technology
Evaluation (SITE) program. This program offers a mechanism
for conducting joint technology demonstration/evaluation
projects between the private sector and EPA. The purpose of
the program is to provide an opportunity for developers to
demonstrate the performance of their technologies on actual
hazardous waste materials, and provide reliable and accurate
information for future cleanup activities at Superfund sites.
Currently there are 38 active projects in the Demonstration
Program. Eight of these projects involve solidification/stabili-
zation, nine concentrate on thermal processes, five are bio-
logical processes, and the remaining 16 include separation
techniques, chemical treatment, and in-place vitrification. The
paper briefly describes the active program and highlights
those demonstrations which have been completed.
Specifications: Pub. in the Annual Army Environmental Re-
search and Development Symposium (14th) Proceedings,
November 14-16, 1989, p25-32. 10p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste treat-
ment, Demonstration programs, Superfund Innovative Tech-
nology Evaluation Program.
1231 Development of Emerging Technologies within the
SITE Program
Order Number PB92-217322CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk
Reduction Engineering Lab; 1992
The SITE Program is formed by five research programs: The
Demonstration Program, The Emerging Technology Program,
the Measurement and Monitoring Technology Development
Program, the Innovative Technology Program, and the Tech-
nology Transfer Program. The Emerging Technology (ET)
Program has been in existence for five years and has devel-
oped several innovative technologies that have shown prom-
ise in being applicable to clean-up activities related to haz-
ardous waste problems. Technologies are eligible for the ET
Program when sufficient research data exists validating the
technologies' basic concepts. The EPA contributes funds to
support developers for one or two years. Developers are re-
sponsible for conducting research and providing additional fi-
nancial support in the cooperative research effort. Generally,
technologies are categorized into six areas: Thermal, chemi-
cal, biological, materials handling, physical, and solidification/
stabilization.
Specifications: See also PB90-249756 and PB92-150663.
Presented at the Annual Conference on Contaminated Land:
Policy, Regulation, and Technology (3rd), London, England,
February 6-7, 1992. 26p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Site sur-
veys, Superfund.
232
-------
TECHNOLOGY POLICY & ADMINISTRATION:
Miscellaneous Policy & Program Documents
1232 Emerging Technology Report: Metals Treatment at
Superfund Sites by Absorptive Filtration
Order Number PB93-231165CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
Washington Univ., Seattle.; Environmental Protection Agency,
Cincinnati, OH. Risk Reduction Engineering Lab; Jun 93
The project evaluated an innovative approach for removing
inorganic contaminants from the liquid phase at Superfund
Sites. In the adsorptive filtration process metals are collected
by attachment to a thin layer of ferrihydrite (Iron Oxide) that
has been immobilized on the surface of sand grains. The
modification of the sand surface allows the grains to simulta-
neously adsorb soluable heavy metals and remove particu-
late metals by filtration from a wastewater. The metals stud-
ied were Cd, Cu, and Pb present at 0.5 or 5 mg/L each, in
synthetic solutions.
Specifications: Sponsored by Environmental Protection
Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk Reduction Engineering Lab.
52p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Metals, Water pollu-
tion control.
1233 Engineering Bulletin: Landfill Covers
Order Number PB94-105426CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk
Reduction Engineering Lab; Feb 93
Landfill covers are used at Superfund sites to minimize sur-
face water infiltration and to prevent exposure to the waste.
In many cases, covers are used in conjunction with other
waste treatment technologies, such as slurry walls, ground-
water pump- and treat-systems, and in situ treatment. The
bulletin discusses various aspects of landfill covers, their ap-
plicability, and limitations on their use and describes innova-
tive techniques, site requirements, performance data, current
status, and sources of further information regarding the tech-
nology.
Specifications: See also PB87-119483, PB87-191656,
PB89-233480 and PB90-179664. 9p.
Subject index keywords: Landfills, Coverings, Waste dis-
posal.
1234 Engineering Bulletin: Pyrolysis Treatment
Order Number PB93-105583CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Oct 92
The Engineering Bulletins are a series of documents that
summarize the latest information available on selected treat-
ment and site remediation technologies and related issues.
Pyrolysis is formally defined as chemical decomposition in-
duced in organic materials by heat in the absence of oxygen.
Pyrolysis is a thermal process that transforms hazardous or-
ganic materials into gaseous components and a solid residue
(coke) containing fixed carbon and ash. Upon cooling, the
gaseous components condense, leaving an oil/tar residue.
Pyrolysis is applicable to a wide range of organic wastes and
is generally not used in treating wastes consisting primarily of
inorganics and metals. The bulletin provides information on
the technology applicability, the types of residuals resulting
from the use of the technology, the latest performance data,
site requirements, the status of the technology, and where to
go for further information.
Specifications: 8p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Remedial action,
Waste treatment, Pyrolysis, Hazardous materials, Soil treat-
ment.
1235 Engineering Bulletin: Slurry Walls
Order Number PB93-105575CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Oct 92
Slurry walls are used at Superfund sites to contain the waste
or contamination and to reduce the potential of future migra-
tion of waste constituents. In many cases slurry walls are
used in conjunction with other waste treatment technologies,
such as covers and ground water pump-and-treat systems.
This bulletin discusses various aspects of slurry walls includ-
ing their applicability, limitations on their use, a description of
the technology including innovative techniques, and materials
of construction including new alternative barrier materials,
site requirements, performance data, the status of these
methods, and sources of further information.
Specifications: 10p.
Subject: index keywords: Superfund, Containment, Waste
treatment, Hazardous materials, Slurry walls.
1236 Engineering Bulletins: Aids to the Development of
Remedial Alternatives
Order Number PB94-101797CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Science Applications International Corp., Cincinnati, OH.;
Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk
Reduction Engineering Lab; c1991
The paper provides the background for an introduction to the
new series of EPA documents called 'Engineering Bulletins.'
Engineering Bulletins summarize the latest information avail-
able on selected waste treatment and contaminated site re-
mediation technologies and related issues. A description of
the document series is given and a summary of the informa-
tion contained in the first ten bulletins is provided.
Specifications: Pub. in Jnl. of the Air and Waste Manage-
ment Association, v41 n10 p1393-1396 Oct 91. Sponsored
by Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk
Reduction Engineering Lab. 6p.
Subject index keywords: Documents, Technology assess-
ment, Remedial action, Superfund.
1237 Environmental Characteristics of EPA, NRC, and
DOE Sites Contaminated with Radioactive Substances
Order Number PB93-185551CDH, price: PC A05/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Radiation and Indoor Air. Department of Energy, Washington,
DC. Office of Environmental Restoration. Nuclear Regulatory
Commission, Washington, DC. Office of Nuclear Material
Safety and Safeguards; Mar 93
The U.S. EPA offices of Radiation and Indoor Air and Solid
Waste and Emergency Response, the US Department of
Energy Office of Environmental Restoration and Waste Man-
agement, and the Nuclear Regulatory Commission Office of
Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards initiated preliminary
efforts to promote the more appropriate and consistent use
of computer models in remediating sites contaminated by ra-
dioactive substances and managed by the participating fed-
eral agencies. As a baseline for these efforts, the nature and
types of problems present at these sites must be under-
stood. The report responds to this need. It presents in textu-
al, tabular, and graphical formats: a list of the 45 EPA Na-
233
-------
TECHNOLOGY POLICY & ADMINISTRATION:
Miscellaneous Policy & Program Documents
tionai Priorities List Superfund sites and the 38 NRC Site De-
commissioning Management Plan sites containing radioactive
waste, materials, the types of waste found at each site, a de-
scription of the physical form of the waste, physical charac-
teristics of the site, and demographic characteristics of the
region surrounding the site.
Specifications: See also DE90013615. Prepared in coop-
eration with Department of Energy, Washington, DC. Office
of Environmental Restoration, and Nuclear Regulatory Com-
mission, Washington, DC. Office of Nuclear Material Safety
and Safeguards. 93p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Radioactive wastes,
Radioactive contamination, Waste management.
1238 Environmental Monitoring Methods Index (EMMI),
Version 1.0 (5 - User LAN) (for Microcomputers)
Order Number PB92-504257CDH, price: Diskette $995.00
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Science and Technology; Dec 91
EPA's Environmental Monitoring Methods Index System
(EMMJ) is an easy to use PC information data base on all
EPA-regulated substances, methods for their analysis, and
regulatory and office-based lists on which they appear. EMMI
combines rapid look-up with a user-friendly interface and
easily accessible data. The EMMI System aids in the selec-
tion of the appropriate analytical methods for environmental
monitoring studies. The EMMI database includes information
on more than 2600 substances from over 50 regulatory and
non-regulatory lists and more than 900 analytical methods.
EMMI includes substances from the Clean Water Act (CWA),
Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and
Liability Act (CERCLA), Superfund Amendments and Reau-
thorizaUon Act (SARA), Resource Conservation and Recov-
ery Act (RCRA), Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA), and Clean
Air Act (CAA), as well as substances from other Agency and
State lists. The database provides a comprehensive cross-
reference between substances and analytical methods and
contains information on related laws and organizations and
additional databases for further information.
Specifications: The software and database are contained
on three 5 1/2 inch, 1.2M high density and three 3 1/2 inch,
1.44M high density diskettes. File format: Compressed. Doc-
umentation included; may be ordered separately as PB92-
169648. For single user, order PB92-503093, for unlimited
user LAN, order PB92-504265. System: IBM PC or compati-
ble; MS DOS operating system, 512K. Language: System 'J'
Software. System 'J' Software is included in the package.
Decompression software included. See also PB92-592290
(RCRIS), PB91-591310 (CERCLIS), and PB92-501774
(SARA). 6 diskettes.
Subject index keywords: Software, Environmental monitor-
ing, lridexes(Documentati6n).
1239 Environmental Monitoring Methods Index (EMMI),
Version 1.6 (for Microcomputers)
Order Number PB92-503093CDH, price: Diskette $385.00
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Science and Technology; Dec 91
EPA's Environmental Monitoring Methods Index System
(EMMI) is an easy to use PC information data base on all
EPA-regulated substances, methods for their analysis, and
regulatory and office-based lists on which they appear. EMMI
combines rapid look-up with a user-friendly interface and
easily accessible data. The EMMI System aids in the selec-
tion of the appropriate analytical methods for environmental
monitoring studies. The EMMI database includes information
on more than 2600 substances from over 50 regulatory and
non-regulatory lists and more than 900 analytical methods.
EMMI includes substances from the Clean Water Act (CWA),
Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and
Liability Act (CERCLA), Superfund Amendments and Reau-
thorization Act (SARA), Resource Conservation and Recov-
ery Act (RCRA), Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA), and Clean
Air Act (CAA), as well as substances from other Agency and
State lists.
Specifications: The software and database are contained
on three 51/4 inch, 1.2M high density and three 31/2 inch,
1.44M high density diskettes. File format: Compressed. Doc-
umentation included; may be ordered separately as PB92-
169648. For 2-5 user LAN, order PB92-504257, for unlimited
user LAN, order PB92-504265. System: IBM PC or compati-
ble; MS DOS operating system, 512K. Language: System 'J'
Software. System 'J' Software is included in the package.
Decompression software included. See also PB92-592290
(RCRIS), PB91-591310 (CERCLIS), and PB92-501774
(SARA). 6 diskettes.
Subject index keywords: Software, Environmental monitor-
ing, Indexes(Documentation).
1240 Environmental Monitoring Methods Index (EMMI),
Version 1.0 (Unlimited User LAN) (for Microcomputers)
Order Number PB92-504265CDH, price: Diskette $1995.00
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Science and Technology; Dec 91
EPA's Environmental Monitoring Methods Index System
(EMMI) is an easy to use PC information data base on all
EPA-regulated substances, methods for their analysis, and
regulatory and office-based lists on which they appear. EMMI
combines rapid look-up with a user-friendly interface and
easily accessible data. The EMMI System aids in the selec-
tion of the appropriate analytical methods for environmental
monitoring studies. The EMMI database includes information
on more than 2600 substances from over 50 regulatory and
non-regulatory lists and more than 900 analytical methods.
EMMI includes substances from the Clean Water Act (CWA),
Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and
Liability Act (CERCLA), Superfund Amendments and Reau-
thorization Act (SARA), Resource Conservation and Recov-
ery Act (RCRA), Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA), and Clean
Air Act (CAA), as well as substances from other Agency and
State lists. The database provides a comprehensive cross-
reference between substances and analytical methods and
contains information on related laws and organizations and
additional databases for further information.
Specifications: The software and database are contained
on three 51/4 inch, 1.2M high density and three 31/2 inch
1.44M high density and diskettes. File format: Compressed.
Documentation included; may be ordered separately as
PB92-169648. For single user, order number PB92-503093,
for 2-5 user LAN, order PB92-504257. System: IBM PC or
compatible; MS DOS operating system, 512K. Language:
System 'J' Software. System 'J' Software is included in the
package. Decompression software included. See also PB92-
592290 (RCRIS), PB91-591310 (CERCLIS), and PB92-
501774 (SARA). 6 diskettes.
Subject index keywords: Software, Environmental monitor-
ing.
234
-------
TECHNOLOGY POLICY & ADMINISTRATION:
Miscellaneous Policy & Program Documents
1241 EPA/Navy CERCLA Remedial Action Technology
Guide
Order Number PB94-138948CDH, price: PC A13/MF A03
Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH.; Naval
Facilities Engineering Service Center, Port Hueneme, CA;
Nov93
The guide is a collection of (1) Engineering Bulletins pro-
duced by the EPA's Technical Support Branch in Cincinnati,
OH and (2) Remedial Action Tech Data Sheets produced by
the Naval Energy and Environmental Support Activity
(NEESA) in Port Hueneme, CA. These documents compre-
hensively summarize the latest information obtainable on
many of the best available remedial technologies. The intent
is to convey information (based on previous applications) to
help remedial project managers, engineers in charge, on-
scene coordinators, Navy resident officers in charge of con-
struction, and contractors decide if a technology should be
used at a hazardous waste site and if so, what are the rele-
vant design, implementation, and cost considerations. Ad-
denda will be issued periodically to update the original bulle-
tins and tech data sheets, and other technologies may be
added.
Specifications: Prepared in cooperation with Naval Facili-
ties Engineering Service Center, Port Hueneme, CA. 288p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Remedial
action, Superfund.
1242 EPA SITE Demonstration of the Horsehead
Resource Development Company Flame Reactor
Technology
Order Number PB92-139401CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Versar, Inc., Springfield, VA.; PRC Environmental
Management, Inc., Houston, TX.*Environmental Protection
Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk Reduction Engineering Lab;
1992
The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's Superfund Inno-
vative Technology Evaluation (SITE) program selected the
Horsehead Resource Development Company, Inc. (HRD)
Flame Reactor technology for evaluation by demonstration
which took place in March 1991. A series of test runs was
conducted at the HRD facility in Monaca, Pennsylvania,
using 72 tons of secondary lead smelter slag (SLSS) from a
Superfund site in Atlanta, Georgia. The SLSS contained zinc,
iron, cadmium, and many other metals and inorganic com-
pounds. The HRD Flame Reactor technology is a patented
high-temperature thermal process designed to safely treat
wastes containing metals. During processing, the waste is in-
troduced to the hottest portion of the HRD Flame Reactor,
where it is subjected to greater than 2000 C reducing gas.
The waste material reacts rapidly, producing a nonhazardous
vitrified effluent slag and gases, including steam and metal
vapors. The metal vapors react in the combustion chamber
to produce the metal-enriched oxides that are collected in a
baghouse. The SITE program evaluated the HRD Flame Re-
actor for its effectiveness in treating a Superfund site waste,
which is hazardous (by Toxicity Characteristic) for cadmium
and lead, to form a recyclable metal oxide and a vitrified slag
that is nonleachable.
Specifications: Presented at HMCRI's Annual National
Conference and Exhibition (12th), Washington, DC., Decem-
ber 3-5, 1991, p675-678. Prepared in cooperation with PRC
Environmental Management, Inc., Houston, TX. Sponsored
by Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk
Reduction Engineering Lab. 7p.
Subject index keywords: Thermal reactors, Thermal recov-
ery methods, Pollution control equipment, Slags, Waste treat-
ment, Performance evaluation, Superfund Innovative Tech-
nology Evaluation Program.
1243 EPA Site Demonstration of the Terra Vac In situ
Vacuum Extraction Process in Groveland,
Massachusetts. (Site Program Update: Part VII)
Order Number PB91-182097CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk
Reduction Engineering Lab; c1989
The paper presents an EPA evaluation of the patented Terra
Vac, Inc.'s in situ vacuum extraction process that was field-
demonstrated on a trichloroethylene (TCE) contaminated soil
in Groveland, MA, under the EPA Superfund Innovative
Technology Evaluation (SITE) program. The Terra Vac proc-
ess employs vacuum for removal and venting of volatile or-
ganic compounds (VOCs), such as TCE, from the subsurface
soil without excavation. The demonstration site was a proper-
ty of an operating machine shop in Groveland, MA. The site
was contaminated with VOCs, mainly TCE, which had been
used as a degreasing solvent. The Terra Vac system was
designed, installed, and operated by Terra Vac, Inc. Evalua-
tion of the process was performed by EPA based on the re-
sults from an extensive sampling and analytical program and
on daily observation of the operations.
Specifications: Pub. in Jnl. of the Air Pollution Control As-
sociation, v39 n8 p1054-1062 Aug 89. 10p.
Subject index keywords: Remedial action, Land pollution
control, Volatile organic compounds, Superfund Innovative
Technology Evaluation Program, Terra Vac System, Soil
vacuum extraction.
1244 Estimation of the Cost of Using Chemical Protective
Clothing
Order Number PB93-168805CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Little (Arthur D.), Inc., Cambridge, MA.; Environmental
Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk Reduction
Engineering Lab; 1993
The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, either directly or
through its Superfund contractors, is a major user of chemi-
cal protective clothing. The purpose of the study was to de-
velop estimates for the cost of using this clothing. These es-
timates can be used to guide purchase decisions and use
practices. For example, economic guidelines would assist in
decisions pertinent to single-use versus reusable clothing.
Eight cost elements were considered: (1) purchase cost, (2)
the number of times an item is used, (3) the number of items
used per day, (4) cost of decontamination, (5) cost of inspec-
tion, (6) cost of maintenance, (7) cost of storage, and (8)
cost of disposal. Estimates or assumed inputs for each of
these elements were developed based on labor costs, fixed
costs, and recurring costs. The cost elements were com-
bined into an economic (mathematical) model having the
single output of cost/use. By comparing cost/use for various
use scenarios, conclusions are readily reached as to the op-
timum economics for purchase, use, and reuse of the cloth-
ing. In general, clothing should be considered disposable if
its purchase cost is less than its average cost/use per use
for the anticipated number of times it will be reused.
235
-------
TECHNOLOGY POLICY & ADMINISTRATION:
Miscellaneous Policy & Program Documents
Specifications: Pub. in Proceedings of the Performance of
Protective Clothing, v4 p972-981. Sponsored by Environmen-
tal Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk Reduction Engi-
neering Lab. 11 p.
Subject index keywords: Cost estimates, Protective cloth-
ing, Chemical compounds, Economic analysis, Occupational
safety and health, Industrial safety.
1245 Evaluation of Cleanup Levels for Remedial Action at
CERCLA (Comprehensive Environmental Response,
Compensation and Liability Act) Sites Based on a
Review of EPA (Environmental Protection Agency)
Records of Decision
Order Number DE89007900CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
Oak Ridge National Lab., TN.; Department of Energy,
Washington, DC; Jan 89
The review revealed that the record of decision (ROD) is an
imperfect instrument for examining the issue of how clean is
clean. The expectation of finding cleanup goals in each ROD
was not fulfilled for at least four reasons. First, many sites
are cleaned up in discrete steps or operable units; hence, a
ROD may not cover the full remedy. Second, the technical
feasibility of cleaning up a site is often unknown. In such
cases, cleanup levels are defined after implementation of the
remedy and not before. Third, the EPA often designs flexibil-
ity into the remedy selection process. In such cases, the
ROD does not make a decision on waste treatment technol-
ogy and, hence, the cleanup goal. Finally, some RODs are
simply deficient, lacking clarity, pertinent text, or substantive
Information. This review makes it clear that most Superfund
cleanup goals fall short of returning sites to a pristine condi-
tion. However, the EPA has been consistent in its remedy
selection. Details may vary, but the gross features of reme-
dies are largely consistent and predictable. Uniform stand-
ards are not achieved in each cleanup because most sites
present complex and often unique cleanup problems. Reme-
dies to reduce the toxicity, volume, or mobility of hazardous
wastes without land disposal are expensive, technically diffi-
cult, and sometimes unavailable. As a result, the EPA opts
for practical solutions and defends its actions with carefully
crafted narratives intended to minimize regulatory, legal, and
bureaucratic entanglements. Hence, "clean" becomes what-
ever can be done at a reasonable cost with the technology
available and that will be accepted by the public. 18 refs., 2
figs., 20 tabs. (ERA citation 14:017155)
Specifications: Portions of this document are illegible in
microfiche products. 51 p.
Subject Index keywords: Abandoned Sites, Hazardous Ma-
terials, Pollution Laws, Superfund, Remedial Action.
1246 Evaluation of Exposure Markers
Order Number PB91-144675CDH, price: PC A06/MF A01
Integrated Lab. Systems, Research Triangle Park, NC.;
Environmental Monitoring Systems Lab., Las Vegas,
NV.*Army Biomedical Research and Development Lab., Fort
Detrick, MD; Dec 90
The primary purpose of the research has been to determine
the suitability of the single cell gel (SCG) assay technique for
detecting DNA damage induced by genotoxic pollutants in
cells sampled from various organs of rodents and in cells
sampled from humans. The major chemicals evaluated in-
clude acrylamide, trichloroethylene, and dimethylbenzanthra-
cene. The focus of the research has been on: (1) evaluating
the specificity and sensitivity of the technique by determining
the magnitude and kinetics of DNA damage induced in cul-
tured mammalian cells by a variety of genotoxic chemicals;
(2) developing appropriate methods for isolating individual
cells from organs of rodents; (3) evaluating the kinetics of
DNA damage induced in various organs of male mice; (4) ex-
amining the applicability of the assay to peripheral blood leu-
kocytes obtained from humans exposed to genotoxic agents;
and (5) comparing the levels of DNA damage in the organs
of mice collected at an EPA Superfund site. Based on the
results obtained, the technique will provide, with greater sen-
sitivity than any other method currently available, data on the
induction and persistence of organ-specific levels of DNA
damage resulting from environmental exposure to genotoxic
pollutants.
Specifications: Sponsored by Environmental Monitoring
Systems Lab., Las Vegas, NV., and Army Biomedical Re-
search and Development Lab., Fort Detrick, MD. 109p.
Subject index keywords: Toxicity, Mutagenicity tests, DNA
damage, Biological markers, Environmental pollutants, Single
gel electrophoresis.
1247 Evaluation of Modifications to Extraction
Procedures Used in Analysis of Environmental Samples
from Superfund Sites
Order Number PB90-103516CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Lockheed Engineering and Sciences Co., Inc., Las Vegas,
NV.; Environmental Protection Agency, Las Vegas, NV;
C1989
Recoveries from an aqueous sample of the semi-volatile an-
alytes listed on the EPA Target Compound List are com-
pared using 6 different methylene chloride extraction proce-
dures. Four experimental designs incorporating a continuous
extraction apparatus are evaluated, and 2 experimental de-
signs using separatory funnel methods are tested. In addi-
tion, 2 concentration procedures are compared, and the loss
of analytes associated with both extraction and concentra-
tion procedures are determined. These studies indicate that
the most efficient and economical technique for the extrac-
tion of these compounds from an aqueous matrix is a single
continuous extraction procedure performed at 2 pH.
Specifications: Pub. in Jnl. of the Association of Official An-
alytical Chemists, v72 n4 p602-608 1989. Sponsored by En-
vironmental Protection Agency, Las Vegas, NV. 9p.
Subject index keywords: Chemical analysis, Waste dispos-
al, Site surveys, Solvent extraction, Superfund program.
1248 Evaluation of Personal Cooling Devices for Dioxin
Clean-Up Operation
Order Number PB92-206895CDH, price: PC A05/MF A01
Little (Arthur D.), Inc., Cambridge, MA.; Multi-Tech, Inc.,
Natick, MA.*Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati,
OH. Risk Reduction Engineering Lab; 7 Sep 88
The study investigated the use of personal coolers to in-
crease worker productivity and safety while working at ele-
vated, ambient temperatures cleaning up dioxin contaminat-
ed soil. The study included laboratory tests to measure the
thermal characteristics of the chemical protective clothing
worn and the performance of ice vest and vortex personal
coolers. In addition, field tests were conducted at a dioxin
clean-up site to evaluate the performance of these two types
of personal coolers. The use of personal coolers was found
to be an effective method of reducing the risk of heat stress.
In addition, workers were able to work continuously in hot
236
-------
TECHNOLOGY POLICY & ADMINISTRATION:
Miscellaneous Policy & Program Documents
weather without following the procedure normally used to de-
crease heat stress, i.e., working one hour followed by one
hour of resting. Both types of personal coolers were accepta-
ble for the task being performed.
Specifications: See also PB86-236122 and PB86-176344.
Prepared in cooperation with Multi-Tech, Inc., Natick, MA.
Sponsored by Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati,
OH. Risk Reduction Engineering Lab. 84p.
Subject index keywords: Dioxin, Protective equipment, Per-
sonal cooling devices, Superfund sites.
1249 Evaluation of Terrestrial Indicators for Use in
Ecological Assessments at Hazardous Waste Sites
Order Number PB93-100865GDH, price: PC A12/MF A03
ManTech Environmental Technology, Inc., Corvallis, OR.;
Missouri Univ.-Columbia.**Battelle Pacific Northwest Labs.,
Richland, WA.*Corvallis Environmental Research Lab., OR;
24 Sep 92
The target audience for the compendium includes regional
project managers and biological technical assistance groups.
The methods summarized are grouped according to their po-
tential target or receptor classification; animal, plant, or mi-
crobial. Methods which assess soils directly are emphasized
here but additional methods applicable to wetlands soils or
sediments have also been included to complement those
methods readily available for aquatic and sediment toxicity
assessment. Some of the methods summarized represent
consensus standards that have previously been identified as
methods applicable to soil testing, while others are less well
characterized but remain potential candidate methods for bi-
ological evaluation of soil contamination. Tabular guides to
the selection of tests methods applicable to various habitats
and toxicity endpoints are summarized to help potential users
select the most appropriate biological assessment tool for
the site under consideration.
Specifications: See also PB89-205967. Prepared in coop-
eration with Missouri Univ.-Columbia, and Battelle Pacific
Northwest Labs., Richland, WA. Sponsored by Corvallis Envi-
ronmental Research Lab., OR. 255p.
Subject index keywords: Terrestrial ecosystems, Hazard-
ous materials, Waste disposal, Superfund, Biological effects.
1250 Factors Affecting the Applicability of Plasma
Systems to the Cleanup of Superfund Sites
Order Number PB91-162784CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk
Reduction Engineering Lab; 1991
For the past ten years, the U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) has been evaluating plasma-based thermal
treatment systems for hazardous waste. Although many at-
tempts have been made to evaluate these devices, very little
performance data have been gathered. EPA is still interested
in evaluating the usefulness of plasma based hazardous
waste treatment and routinely receives proposals for testing
new and different plasma systems. Unfortunately, however,
elements of many of these proposals suggest that these
studies would be a little more successful than previous ones.
Part of the reason for this may be that the developers of
plasma systems do not clearly understand what is required
of a hazardous waste treatment system, especially one
which will be used to treat hazardous wastes onsite. The
paper discusses factors that, based on EPA's experience,
are key to the successful implementation of a plasma-based
waste treatment process.
Specifications: Presented at Annual Conference on Plasma
Applications, (1st) Idaho Falls, ID., January 15-17, 1991. 11 p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Remedial action, Haz-
ardous materials, Waste treatment, Plasma heating, Cleanup.
1251 Field Applications of Robotic Systems in Hazardous
Environments, p1-29 1993. See also PB86-176344 and
PB92-166743
Order Number PB93-229755CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk
Reduction Engineering Lab; c1993
The chapter addresses field applications of robotic systems
at hazardous waste sites and in handling hazardous materi-
als. Included are an overview of EPA's current programs, as
they relate to robotic technology at hazardous waste sites;
potential application of robotics at those waste sites; exam-
ples of EPA's robotics projects; and the benefits of robotics
to EPA.
Specifications: 34p.
Subject index keywords: Robots, Hazardous materials, Oc-
cupational safety and health.
1252 Forum on Innovative Hazardous Waste Treatment
Technologies: Domestic and International. Held in
Atlanta, Georgia on June 19-21, 1989. Abstract
Proceedings
Order Number PB90-268509CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
JACA Corp., Fort Washington, PA.; Environmental Protection
Agency, Washington, DC. Office of Emergency and Remedial
Response; Sep 89
On June 19-21, 1989, the U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency's Office of Program Management and Technology
hosted an international conference in Atlanta, GA, to ex-
change solutions to hazardous waste treatment problems.
During the conference, scientists and engineers representing
government agencies, industry, and academia attended 30
presentations describing successful case studies of physical/
chemical, biological, thermal, and stabilization treatment
methods. In addition, domestic and international scientists
and vendors presented over 40 posters explaining their treat-
ment methods and results.
Specifications: See also PB90-183799. Sponsored by Envi-
ronmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response. 56p.
Subject index keywords: Ground water, Hazardous wastes,
Waste treatment, Meetings, Superfund.
1253 Forum on Innovative Hazardous Waste Treatment
Technologies: Domestic and International. Held in
Atlanta, Georgia on June 19-21, 1989. Technical Papers
Order Number PB90-183799CDH, price: PC A15/MF A02
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Sep 89
As a result of the high level of interest in innovative hazard-
ous waste control technologies, U.S. EPA's Office of Solid
Waste and Emergency Response and Risk Reduction Engi-
neering Laboratory jointly conducted this conference. The
conference consisted of presentations of technical papers
and posters by international and domestic vendors of tech-
nologies for the treatment of waste, sludge, and contaminat-
ed soils at uncontrolled hazardous waste disposal sites. The
purpose of the 21/2 day conference was two-fold: to help
introduce promising international technologies through tech-
237
-------
TECHNOLOGY POLICY & ADMINISTRATION:
Miscellaneous Policy & Program Documents
nical paper and poster displays; and to showcase results of
the U.S. EPA Superfund Innovative Technology Evaluation
program technologies in addition to other domestic innova-
tive technologies. Both were aimed at increasing awareness
of the user community in technologies ready for application.
The compendium does not include all papers that were pre-
sented; only those that were made available by authors and
their institutions are included.
Specifications: 328p.
Subject Index keywords: Meetings, Hazardous materials,
Waste treatment, Pollution control, Technology utilization,
Land pollution.
1254 Forum on Innovative Hazardous Waste Treatment
Technologies (3rd): Domestic and International. Held in
Dallas, Texas on June 11-13, 1991. Technical Papers
Order Number PB92-219732CDH, price: PC A22/MF A04
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Sep 91
On June 11-13, 1991, the U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency's Technology Innovation Office and Risk Reduction
Engineering Laboratory hosted an international conference in
Dallas, TX, to exchange solutions to hazardous waste treat-
ment problems. This conference, the Third Forum on Innova-
tive Hazardous Waste Treatment Technologies: Domestic
and International, was attended by approximately 750 repre-
sentatives from the U.S. and several foreign countries.
During the conference, scientists and engineers representing
government agencies, industry, and academia attended 37
presentations describing domestic and international technol-
ogies for the treatment of waste, sludges, and contaminated
soils at uncontrolled hazardous waste disposal sites. Tech-
nologies included physical/chemical, biological, thermal, and
stabilization techniques presented by EPA and other federal
government agency contractors. Domestic and international
scientists and vendors presented over 50 posters explaining
their treatment methods and results.
Specifications: See also PB91-145649. 514p.
Subject index keywords: Meetings, Hazardous materials,
Waste treatment, Technology innovation.
1255 Furthering the Use of Innovative Treatment
Technologies In OSWER Programs
Order Number PB91-921336CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; 10 Jun 91
The Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response
(OSWER), in this directive, is seeking to further the use of
innovative treatment technologies in order to (1) better
pursue its statutory and regulatory mandates to promote
treatment to the maximum extent practicable; (2) speed the
availability of performance data regarding newly developed
treatment technologies to many constituencies facing man-
dates to clean contaminated sites; (3) broaden the inventory
of accepted treatment-based solutions; and (4) increase the
likelihood the remediation costs can be lowered in the near
term through the demonstration of a larger number of engi-
neering options to solve site remediation problems.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $150 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $300). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 22p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
Waste treatment, Hazardous materials, Office of Solid Waste
and Emergency Response.
1256 Furthering the Use of Innovative Treatment
Technologies in OSWER Programs
Order Number PB91-921366CDH, price: PC A01/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Aug 91
The fact sheet provides an overview of directive 9380.0-17,
Furthering the Use of Innovative Treatment Technologies in
OSWER Programs. The Office of Solid Waste and Emergen-
cy Response (OSWER) is seeking to further the use of inno-
vative treatment technologies in order to (1) better pursue its
statutory and regulatory mandates to promote treatment to
the maximum extent practicable, (2) speed the availability of
performance data regarding newly developed treatment tech-
nologies to many constituencies facing mandates to clean
contaminated sites, (3) broaden the inventory of accepted
treatment-based solutions and (4) increase the likelihood the
remediation costs can be lowered.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $150 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $300). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 5p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste treat-
ment, Superfund, Clean up.
1257 Future of Expert Systems in the Environmental
Protection Agency
Order Number PB91-162727CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk
Reduction Engineering Lab.; Computer Sciences Corp.,
Cincinnati, OH; c1989
As in other organizations, the history of expert systems in the
Environmental Protection Agency is very short. Approximate-
ly five years ago, the focus of the expert systems activities
was to assess the feasibility and utility as environmental de-
cision aids. Last year the Agency approved a five year fund-
ing initiative to support development of a number of systems
to assist in management and implementation of Superfund
activities. Whereas initial systems were limited to a few engi-
neering and technical issues, the scope of todays systems
includes legal, regulatory and administrative issues. Notwith-
standing this rapid evolution in scope and funding, expert
systems are not currently mainstream decision making tools
in the Environmental Protection Agency. Many decision
makers are either not familiar with expert systems or are
skeptical that they can provide meaningful and reliable
advice. Since expert systems are so new and have not yet
been proved for wide spread application in regulatory envi-
ronment, their future is uncertain. With this background, the
paper will propose one or more scenarios for the future of
expert systems in the Environmental Protection Agency.
(Copyright (c) 1990 American Chemical Society.)
Specifications: Presented at the American Chemical Socie-
ty Conference, Miami, FL., September 10-15, 1989. Prepared
in cooperation with Computer Sciences Corp., Cincinnati,
OH. 10p.
Subject index keywords: Environmental tests, US EPA, En-
vironmental management, Expert systems.
238
-------
TECHNOLOGY POLICY & ADMINISTRATION:
Miscellaneous Policy & Program Documents
1258 Granular Activated Carbon Treatment. Engineering
Bulletin
Order Number PB92-180058CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Oct 91
Granular activated carbon (GAC) treatment is a physico-
chemical process that removes a wide variety of contami-
nants by adsorbing them from liquid and gas streams. The
treatment is most commonly used to separate organic con-
taminants from water or air; however, it can be used to
remove a limited number of inorganic contaminants. In most
cases, the contaminants are collected in concentrated form
on the GAC, and further treatment is required. Site-specific
treatability studies are generally necessary to document the
applicability and potential performance of a GAC system.
The bulletin provides information on the technology applica-
bility, technology limitations, a technology description, the
types of residuals produced, site requirements, latest per-
formance data, status of the technology, and sources for fur-
ther information.
Specifications: See also PB87-110656 and PB89-132674.
9p.
Subject index keywords: Waste treatment, Granular activat-
ed carbon treatment, Hazardous materials, Water pollution
control, Remedial action.
1259 Guidance Documents Relating to Landfills and
Contaminants
Order Number PB90-261835CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk
Reduction Engineering Lab; 1990
The Environmental Protection Agency is developing and up-
dating a series of Technical Guidance Documents to provide
best engineering control technology to meet the needs of the
Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) and the
Comprehensive Environmental Response Compensation and
Liability Act (CERCLA), respectively. These documents are
the compilation of the research efforts to date relating to
containment of pollutants from waste disposal to the land as
relates to residuals management. The specific areas of re-
search being conducted under the RCRA land disposal pro-
gram relates to laboratory, pilot and field validation studies in
cover systems, waste leaching and solidification, liner sys-
tems and disposal facility evaluation. The specific areas of
research being conducted under the CERCLA uncontrolled
waste sites (Superfund) program relate to in situ treatment,
solidification/stabilization for treating hazardous waste, com-
bustion technologies, best demonstrated available technolo-
gy (BOAT), on-site treatment technologies, emerging biosys-
tems, expert systems, personnel health protection equip-
ment, and site and situation assessment. The Guidance Doc-
uments are intended to assist both the regulated community
and the permitting authorities, as well as the Program Of-
fices, and Regions, as well as the states and other interested
parties, with the latest information relevant to waste manage-
ment.
Specifications: Presented at the Annual Recycling Con-
gress (6th), Berlin, Germany, November 28-30, 1989. Up.
Subject index keywords: Guidelines, Earth fills, Hazardous
materials, Best technology, Land disposal.
1260 Guidance on Remedial Actions for Superfund Sites
with PCIB Contamination
Order Number PB91-145466CDH, price: PC A08/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Aug 90
The document describes the recommended approach for
evaluating and remediating Superfund sites with PCB con-
tamination. It provides starting point cleanup levels for vari-
ous media that may become contaminated and identifies
other considerations important to ensuring protection of
human health and the environment that these cleanup levels
may not address. The guidance also describes how to devel-
op remedial alternatives for PCB contaminated materials that
are consistent with Superfund program expectations and re-
quirements. The guidance concludes with a discussion of
considerations unique to PCBs that should be considered in
the nine criteria evaluation and likely tradeoffs between op-
tions that are likely to occur.
Specifications: Also available from Supt. of Docs. 151 p.
Subject index keywords: Chlorine organic compounds,
Hazardous materials, Pollution control, Superfund.
1261 Guidance on Remedial Actions for Superfund Sites
with PCI3 Contamination
Order Number PB91-921206CDH, price: PC A07/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Aug 90
The document describes the recommend approach for evalu-
ating and remediating Superfund sites with PCB contamina-
tion. It should be used as aguide in the investigation and
remedy selection process for PCB-contaminated Superfund
sites. The guidance provides preliminary remediation goals
for various media that may be contaminated and identifies
other considerations important to ensuring protection of
human health and the environment. In addition, potential ap-
plicable or relevant and appropriate requirements (ARARs)
and 'to-be-considered' criteria pertinent to Superfund sites
with PCB contamination and their integration into the RI/FS
and remedy selection process are summarized. The guid-
ance also describes how to develop remedial alternatives for
PCB contaminated materials that are consistent with Super-
fund program expectations and ARARs. To identify the areas
for which a response action should be considered, starting
point concentrations (preliminary cleanup goals) for each
media are identified.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 148p.
Subject index keywords: Public health, Hazardous materi-
als, Pollution control, Superfund, Polychlorinated biphenyl.
1262 Guide on Remedial Actions at Superfund Sites with
PCB Contamination
Order Number PB90-274432CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Aug 90
The fact sheet summarizes pertinent considerations in the
development, evaluation, and selection of remedial actions at
Superfund sites with PCB contamination. It provides a gener-
al framework for determining cleanup levels, identifying treat-
ment options, and assessing necessary management con-
trols for residuals. ,
239
-------
TECHNOLOGY POLICY & ADMINISTRATION:
Miscellaneous Policy & Program Documents
Specifications: 8p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Guidelines,
Superfund, Waste management, Office of Solid Waste and
Emergency Response, Remedial action, Polychlorinated bi-
phenyls.
1263 Horsehead Resource Development Company, Inc.
Flame Reactor Technology: Applications Analysis Report
Order Number PB92-213214CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
PRC Environmental Management, Inc., Chicago, IL;
Horsehead Resource Development Co., Inc., Monaca,
PA.*Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk
Reduction Engineering Lab; May 92
A SfTE demonstration of the Horsehead Resource Develop-
ment (HRD) Company, Inc. Flame Reactor Technology was
conducted in March 1991 at the HRD facility in Monaca,
Pennsylvania. For the demonstration, secondary lead smelter
soda slag was treated to produce a potentially recyclable
lead- and zinc-enrichecl oxide product and a nonhazardous
(based on the regulatory requirements of the Toxicity Char-
acteristic test) effluent slag. The lead and zinc in the oxide
product were concentrated about threefold from the feed
concentrations. The effluent slag was determined to be non-
hazardous based qn extraction by the Toxicity Characteristic
Leaching Procedure. Potential wastes that might be treated
include industrial residues, Resource Conservation and Re-
covery Act wastes, Superfund wastes, and other wastes con-
taminated with metals and organic wastes.
Specifications: See also PB92-139401 and PB92-505822.
Prepared in cooperation with Horsehead Resource Develop-
ment Co., Inc., Monaca, PA. Sponsored by Environmental
Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk Reduction Engineer-
ing Lab. 70p.
Subject Index keywords: Thermal reactors, Materials recov-
ery, Waste treatment, Superfund Innovative Technology Eval-
uation Program, Horsehead Resource Development Compa-
ny.
1264 Horsehead Resource Development Company, Inc.,
Flame Reactor Technology. Technology Demonstration
Summary
Order Number PB93-145639CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk
Reduction Engineering Lab; Oct 92
Under the Superfund Innovative Technology Evaluation
(SITE) program, the Horsehead Resource Development
Company, Inc., (HRD) Flame Reactor was evaluated during a
series of test runs. The tests were conducted at the HRD fa-
cility in Monaca, PA, using 72 tons of secondary lead smelter
soda slag (waste feed) from the National Smelting and Refin-
ing Company, Inc., site in Atlanta, GA. The waste feed con-
tained lead, zinc, iron, and many other metals and inorganic
compounds. This summary includes an overview of the dem-
onstration, a technology description, analytical results, and
conclusions.
Specifications: See also PB92-213214. 8p.
Subject index keywords: Waste treatment, Technology in-
novation, Slags, Hazardous materials, Superfund Innovative
Technology Evaluation Program, HRD flame reactor.
1265 Hydraulic Fracturing Technology: Technology
Evaluation Report and Application Analysis Report
Order Number PB94-100161CDH, price: PC A08/MF A02
PRC Environmental Management, Inc., Rolling Meadows, IL;
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Aug 93
Two pilot-scale demonstrations of the hydraulic fracturing
technology for enhancing the permeability of contaminated
silty clays have been evaluated under the Superfund Innova-
tive Technology Evaluation (SITE) Program. The hydraulic
fracturing technology was demonstrated in 1991 and 1992 at
a extraction site in Oak Brook, Illinois, and at a bioremedia-
tion site near Dayton, Ohio. The technology was jointly de-
veloped by the University of Cincinnati (UC) and the Risk Re-
duction Engineering Laboratory. Tests were also conducted
at UC Center Hill Solid and Hazardous Waste Research
(Center Hill) Facility by UC. These tests were conducted to
determine the factors affecting soil vapor flow through sand-
filled hydraulic fractures.
Specifications: Sponsored by Environmental Protection
Agency, Washington, DC. Office of Emergency and Remedial
Response. 150p.
Subject index keywords: Hydraulic fracturing, Superfund,
Remedial action.
1266 Implementation Plan for the Record of Decision for
Disposal of Hanford Defense High-Level, Transuranic,
and Tank Wastes
Order Number DE89010128CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Department of Energy, Ricfiland, WA. Richland Operations
Office.; Department of Energy, Washington, DC; Jun 88
The Record of Decision concludes one phase and initiates
another leading to the disposal of two thirds (by radioactivity)
of the defense waste at Hanford. It also commits to continu-
ing evaluations for most of the remaining one third before
final disposal or remediation decisions are made. The US
Department of Energy (DOE) has decided to implement the
preferred alternative. The preferred alternative recommends
disposal of double-shell tank waste, and encapsulated
cesium and strontium waste. Also to be disposed of is the
only solid waste site from before 1970 suspected of being
contaminated with transufanic elements and not on Han-
ford's central plateau. This site is near the commercial nucle-
ar power plant operated by the Washington Public Power
Supply System (WNP-2). Disposal costs stated in this plan,
including costs for construction of disposal facilities, are
taken from the HDW-EIS. Schedules for disposal activities
are from the Hanford Waste Management Plan (DOE/RL 87-
13). Schedules for development and evaluation activities are
from the Hanford Waste Management Technology Plan
(DOE/RL 87-14). Estimated costs and schedules are subject
to change as activities proceed, implementing requirements
of environmental regulations are further defined, more de-
tailed studies are performed, policy decisions are made af-
fecting work scope (e.g., the decision to place N Reactor in
cold standby), and funding levels are defined through the
Federal budgeting process. The Hanford Waste Management
Plan and the Hanford Waste Management Technology Plan
are revised annually to provide updated information on costs
and schedules for disposal and development activities.
These or their successors should be referred to for current
information on disposal plans, costs, and schedules. Dispos-
al operations will be conducted in compliance with all appli-
240
-------
TECHNOLOGY POLICY & ADMINISTRATION*.
Miscellaneous Policy & Program Documents
cable environmental regulations, standards, and permit re-
quirements. (ERA citation 14:024166)
Specifications: Portions of this document are illegible in
microfiche products. 29p.
Subject index keywords: High-Level Radioactive Wastes,
Planning, Radioactive Waste Management.
1267 Incineration Data on Arsenic and Lead Emissions
Order Number PB92-179043CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Kennesaw State Coll., Marietta, GA.; Environmental
Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk Reduction
Engineering Lab; 1992
Since 1988, nine test programs have been conducted at the
Environmental Protection Agency Incineration Research Fa-
cility aimed at evaluating the fate of trace metals in the rotary
kiln incineration of hazardous wastes and Superfund site ma-
terials. Results of six of those test programs have been re-
ported to date. Of these six, two were parametric test series
using a synthetic hazardous waste formulation and four were
incineration treatability test programs using contaminated Su-
perfund site materials. Results of these six text programs
show remarkably consistent arsenic and lead partitioning be-
havior among the incinerator system discharge streams.
Overall test programs lead exhibits relatively nonvolatile be-
havior over a kiln temperature range from nominally 815 C
(1,500 F) to 980 C (1.800F) provided no chlorine is present
in the feed material. Arsenic also exhibits relatively nonvola-
tile behavior over the same temperature range regardless of
whether the feed contains chlorine at levels up to nominally
8 percent. Arsenic may be more volatile in the incineration of
environmental samples such as Superfund site wastes than it
is from a synthetic waste in which arsenic is introduced as
As2O3 in aqueous solution. However, even with environmen-
tal samples, behavior is relatively nonvolatile. Lead volatility
significantly increases at all kiln temperatures as feed chlo-
rine content increases from 0 to as high as 8 percent.
Specifications: Sponsored by Environmental Protection
Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk Reduction Engineering Lab.
14p.
Subject index keywords: Waste disposal, Incineration, Air
pollution control equipment, Arsenic, Lead(Metal).
1268 Incineration Treatment of Arsenic-Contaminated
Soil
Order Number PB91-183541CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Acurex Corp., Mountain View, CA.; Environmental Protection
Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk Reduction Engineering Lab:
c1991
An incineration test program was conducted at the US Envi-
ronmental Protection Agency's Incineration Research Facility
to evaluate the potential of incineration as a treatment option
for contaminated soils at the Baird and McGuire Superfund
site in Holbrook, Massachusetts. The purpose of these tests
was to evaluate the incinerability of these soils in terms of
the fate of arsenic and lead and the destruction of organic
contaminants during the incineration process. The test pro-
gram consisted of a series of bench-scale experiments with
a muffle furnace and a series of incineration tests in a pilot-
scale rotary kiln incinerator system. The study reported in the
paper was funded by the Environmental Protection Agency
under Contract 68-C9-0038 to Acurex Corporation. It has
been subjected to the Agency's review and has been ap-
proved for publication. Mention of trade names or commer-
cial products does not constitute endorsement or recommen-
dation for use.
Specifications: Pub. in Remediation, p227-237 Spring 1991.
Sponsored by Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati,
OH. Risk Reduction Engineering Lab. 13p.
Subject index keywords: Incineration, Remedial action, Soil
contamination, Waste management, Superfund, Air pollution
control.
1269 Innovative Operational Treatment Technologies for
Application to Superfund Site: Nine Case Studies
Order Number PB90-202656CDH, price: PC A07/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Apr 90
Nine case studies are presented in a report that was de-
signed to identify and obtain operational data from ongoing
and completed remediation efforts. The case studies are pre-
sented as appendices, and provide process descriptions,
performance, operational and cost data. The nine appendi-
ces present case studies on the following topics. Incineration
of Explosives and Contaminated soils. Groundwater Extrac-
tion with Air Stripping, Groundwater Biodegradation Treat-
ment System, Ground Extraction and Treatment, Groundwat-
er Extraction with Air Stripping and Soil Vacuum Extraction,
Groundwater Extraction with Physical Chemical and Biologi-
cal Treatment, and Chemical Treatment of Groundwater and
Soil Flushing.
Specifications: 147p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste treat-
ment.
1270 Innovative Technology: BEST Solvent Extraction
Process
Order Number PB90-274218CDH, price: PC A01/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Nov 89
The fact sheet provides technology description, site charac-
teristics affecting treatment feasibility, technology consider-
ations, and technology status for the BEST solvent extraction
process. The sheet describes the BEST process as using
one or more secondary or tertiary amines to separate toxic
wastes and oils from sludges or soils.
Specifications: 5p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Solvent ex-
traction, Superfund, Waste management, Office of Solid
Waste and Emergency Response, Best technology.
1271 Innovative Technology: Slurry-Phase
Biodegradation
Order Number PB90-274200CDH, price: PC A01/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Nov 89
The fact sheet provides technology description, site charac-
teristics affecting treatment feasibility, technology consider-
ations, and technology status for Slurry Phase Biodegrada-
tion (SPB). The sheet describes how SPB is potentially effec-
tive in treating various organic contaminants.
Specifications: 5p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Biodeterior-
ation, Slurries, Waste treatment, Superfund, Waste manage-
ment, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response, Re-
medial action.
241
-------
TECHNOLOGY POLICY & ADMINISTRATION:
Miscellaneous Policy & Program Documents
1272 Innovative Treatment Technologies: Overview and
Guide to Information Sources
Order Number PB92-1791)01 CDH, price: PC A20/MF A04
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Oct 91
Content: The document is a compilation of information on in-
novative treatment technologies being used in the Superfund
program and is intended to assist site project managers, con-
sultants, responsible parties, and owner/operators in their ef-
forts to identify current literature on innovative treatment
technologies for hazardous waste remediation on corrective
action. The technologies addressed in the guide include the
following: Incineration, Thermal Desorption, Soil Washing,
Solvent Extraction, Dechlorination, Bioremediation, Vacuum
Extraction, Vitrification, and Ground Water Treatment. Also
included in the guide for the user's reference are summary
statistics of EPA's selection and application of innovative
treatment technologies between 1982 and 1990. In addition
the guide provides for each technology a detailed descrip-
tion, status of development and application, strengths, weak-
nesses and materials handling considerations. A comprehen-
sive bibliography for each technology can be found within
each chapter.
Specifications: 460p.
Subject Index keywords: Superfund, Hazardous materials,
Waste treatment, Remedial action, Waste disposal.
1273 Innovative Treatment Technologies: Semi-Annual
Status Report (Fourth Edition)
Order Number PB93-133387CDH, price: PC A05/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC.
Technology Innovation Office; Oct 92
The twice yearly report contains site-specific information on
Superfund sites (both remedial and emergency response ac-
tions) and non-Superfund sites (within the Departments of
Defense and Energy) where innovative treatment technol-
ogies have been or are being used. Innovative treatment
technologies are treatment technologies for which a lack of
dat£j on cost and performance makes their selection and use
at Superfund sites more difficult. The report documents the
use of the following innovative treatment technologies to
treat ground water in situ, soils, sediments, sludge, and solid-
matrix wastes; bioremediation (ex situ), bioremediation (in
situ), chemical treatment, dechlorination, in situ flushing, in
situ vitrification, soil vapor extraction, soil washing, solvent
extraction, thermal desorption, and other technologies.
Specifications: See also PB92-173210. 87p.
Subject Index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste treat-
ment. Ground water, Soils, Superfund, Remedial action.
1274 Innovative Treatment Technologies: Semi-Annual
Status Report, January 1991. First Issue
Order Number PB91-921290CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Jan 91
The document was developed to provide information on spe-
cific sites that have selected or used innovative treatment
technologies. The information serves several purposes: (1) to
track the progress of innovative technology use; (2) to pro-
vide market information to technology vendors; and (3) to fa-
cilitate communication among innovative technology users.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 30p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste treat-
ment, Superfund.
1275 Innovative Treatment Technologies: Semi-Annual
Status Report. (Third Edition)
Order Number PB92-173210CDH, price: PC A05/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Apr 92
The twice-yearly report contains site-specific information on
Superfund sites (both remedial and emergency response ac-
tions) where innovative treatment technologies have been or
are being used. Innovative treatment technologies are treat-
ment technologies for which a lack of data on cost and per-
formance makes their selection and use at Superfund sites
more difficult. The report documents the use of the following
innovative treatment technologies to treat ground water in
situ, soils, sediments, sludge, and solid-matrix wastes; biore-
mediation (ex situ), bioremediation (in situ), chemical treat-
ment, dechlorination, in situ flushing, in situ vitrification, soil
vapor extraction, soil washing, solvent extraction, thermal de-
sorption, and other technologies. The report includes infor-
mation on 210 applications of innovative treatment technol-
ogies for Superfund remedial actions and 18 applications for
emergency response actions. The April 1992 issue updates
the status of each project listed in the September 1991
report. Additions to the report include 70 innovative treat-
ment technologies selected for remedial actions in Fiscal
Year 1991 Superfund Records of Decision (RODs) and more
detailed information on completed projects.
Specifications: Supersedes PB91-921290. 91 p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Remedial action,
Waste treatment, Water pollution control, Innovative treat-
ment technologies.
1276 Installation Restoration Program. Technical Support
Document for Record of Decision, Cape Newenham, AFS
Order Number AD-A193 502/2CDH, price: PC A05/MF A01
Woodward-Clyde Consultants, Anchorage, AK; 18 Jan 88
This record of decision and supplemental support document
applies to six potential hazardous waste sites identified at
Cape Newenham AFS. The recommendations for all six sites
are the same; therefore, a single document for the entire in-
stallation is warranted. Information presented in this docu-
ment supports a finding that there is no significant impact on
human health or the environment from suspected or con-
firmed past contamination at the Cape Newenham AFS. The
recommended remedy is no further action with regard to in-
vestigation or clean-up of six (6) sites identified as possible
areas of contamination at the Air Force station.
Specifications: 76p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste dis-
posal.
1277 Installation Restoration Program Technical Support
Document for Record of Decision, Tatalina Air Force
Station LRRS Site
Order Number AD-A202 315/8CDH, price: PC A05/MF A01
Woodward-Clyde Consultants, Anchorage, AK; 29 Feb 88
The Tatalina Air Force Station (AFS), located in the south-
central interior of Alaska, was investigated under Phase I of
the Installation Restoration Program (IRP). The findings of
242
-------
TECHNOLOGY POLICY & ADMINISTRATION:
Miscellaneous Policy & Program Documents
that study indicated eleven potentially contaminated hazard-
ous waste areas at the installation. The report recommended
follow-up action for all sites. A 1987 field visit verified that
clean up has occurred at several sites. No evidence of signif-
icant contamination was observed at the sites where cleanup
activities had not occurred. The following document presents
the information collected in support of no further action at
Tatalma AFS. Keywords: Solid waste disposal, Risk screen-
ing. (KR)
Specifications: 79p.
Subject index keywords: Air Force facilities, Waste dispos-
al, Inspection.
1278 International Conference on New Frontiers for
Hazardous Waste Management (Third) Proceedings. Held
in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania on September 10-13,1989
Order Number PB90-127200CDH, price: Call for price
PEI Associates, Inc., Cincinnati, OH.; IT Corp., Knoxville
TN.*Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk
Reduction Engineering Lab.*United Nations Environment
Programme, Paris (France).*World Federation of Engineering
Organizations, Pasadena, CA; c1989
The Third International Conference on New Frontiers for
Hazardous Waste Management was held at Pittsburgh
Pennsylvania, September 10-13, 1989. The purpose of the
conference was to examine the state of technology for the
disposal of hazardous waste. Emphasis was placed on the
presentation of papers that summarized important new tech-
nological developments and concepts with broad internation-
al application. Sessions were held in the areas of: (1) Ther-
mal Treatment, (2) Physical/Chemical Treatment, (3) Biologi-
cal Treatment, (4) Land Disposal, (5) Solidification/Stabiliza-
tion, (6) Waste Minimization, and (7) Waste Management.
Specifications: Also available from Supt. of Docs. Prepared
in cooperation with IT Corp., Knoxville, TN. Sponsored by
Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk Re-
duction Engineering Lab., United Nations Environment Pro-
gramme, Paris (France), and World Federation of Engineer-
ing Organizations, Pasadena, CA. 612p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Pollution,
Meetings.
1279 International Symposium on Field Screening
Methods for Hazardous Wastes and Toxic Chemicals
(2nd), Proceedings. Held in Las Vegas, Nevada on
February 12-14, 1991
Order Number PB92-125764CDH, price: PC$98.00
Department of Energy, Washington, DC.; Environmental
Monitoring Systems Lab., Las Vegas, NV.*Army Toxic and
Hazardous Materials Agency, Aberdeen Proving Ground
MD.* Department of the Air Force, Washington, DC.*Florida
State Univ., Tallahassee; Dec 91
The document presents the technical papers that were pre-
sented at the Second International Symposium on Field
Screening Methods for Hazardous Wastes and Toxic Chemi-
cals. Sixty platform presentations were made and included in
one of ten sessions: chemical sensors; ion mobility spec-
trometry; robotics; QA and study design; air pathway monitor-
ing at Superfund sites; field mobile GC/MS techniques; port-
able gas chromatography; field screening methods for worker
safety; x-ray fluorescence; and, Fourier transform infrared
spectrometry and other spectroscopy methods. In addition,
sixty poster presentations were made and each presenter
submitted a four-page extended abstract for inclusion in the
proceedings. The poster presentations covered the same
topics as those mentioned above and other topics such as
immunoassay techniques, sample preparation techniques,
and case studies of technology application.
Specifications: See also PB90-132572 and PB89-134159.
Sponsored by Environmental Monitoring Systems Lab., Las
Vegas, NV., Army Toxic and Hazardous Materials Agency,
Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD., Department of the Air Force,
Washington, DC., and Florida State Univ., Tallahassee. 850p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous wastes, Meetings,
Waste management, Site characterization, Chemical analysis,
Environmental monitoring.
1280 Issues Paper on Radiation Site Cleanup Regulations
Order Number PB94-112349CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Air and Radiation; Sep 93
EPA prepared the document to present issues, approaches,
and preliminary analyses related to its development of radi-
ation site cleanup regulations. It focuses exclusively on
issues and approaches related to developing cleanup regula-
tions; it does not address issues specific to waste manage-
ment regulations, which will be addressed in a separate doc-
ument. The first three chapters discuss Significant Issues,
Regulatory Approaches, and Summary and Next Steps. Ap-
pendix A presents background information on radioactive
waste and provides additional details of EPA coordination of
its rulemaking effort. Appendix B discusses statutory authori-
ties upon which EPA may base its cleanup regulations. Ap-
pendix C is a copy of the EPA/NRG MOU. Appendix D dis-
cusses the issues raised in NRC's Enhanced Participatory
Rulemaking on Radiological Criteria for Decommissioning, in
which EPA participated. Appendix E is a list of acronyms,
and Appendix F is a glossary of terms used throughout the
document.
Specifications: 67p.
Subject index keywords: Radioactive wastes, Risk assess-
ment, Superfund.
1281 Literature Survey of Innovative Technologies for
Hazardous Waste Site Remediation, 1987-1991
Order Number PB93-105617CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Jul 92
EPA's Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response is
seeking to further the use of innovative hazardous waste
treatment technologies in its programs. In order to achieve
more permanent remedies, the Agency is encouraging the
use of new or innovative technologies that are capable of
treating contaminated soils/sludges and ground water more
effectively, less expensively, and in a manner more accepta-
ble to the public than existing conventional methods. The
bibliography is intended to increase the efficiency of the
technology evaluation process. The document is not meant
to be comprehensive in scope nor is it meant to convey an
endorsement of the citations. It is meant to provide a survey
of publications which could be useful when innovative tech-
nologies are investigated. As a research aid, the bibliography
can help provide insights into current developments and pro-
vide references which may serve as a basis for further inves-
tigations.
Specifications: Also available from Supt. of Docs. 50p.
243
-------
TECHNOLOGY POLICY & ADMINISTRATION:
Miscellaneous Policy & Program Documents
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Remedial
action, Waste treatment, Soil treatment, Bibliographies, Inno-
vative treatment technologies.
1282 Metals Testing Report: Metal Content of
Environmental Samples from Region 4
Order Number PB90-187105CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Corvallis Environmental Research Lab., OR.; NSI Technology
Services Corp., Corvallis, OR; Dec 89
The report summarizes the procedures used to analyze se-
lected aquatic and emergent plant, aquatic insect, and fish
samples for specific metals; and presents the results of the
analyses along with some interpretation. Samples were re-
ceived from Region 4, Environmental Services Division,
Athens, Georgia, under an agreement in which the ERL-C
Site Assessment Team would determine the metal content of
the samples, lead being the primary metal of interest, and
forward the results to Region 4 to aid in the site assess-
ments. Samples were collected from two Superfund sites in
the southeast United States, the Kassouf-Kimerling site in
Tampa, FL, and the Schuylkill site in Plant City, FL. Both
were 'battery cracking' sites. The samples were acid digest-
ed to reduce them to inorganic constituents which were then
analyzed with ICP-AES (inductively-coupled plasma-atomic
emission spectroscopy). Metals assessed included calcium,
magnesium, sodium, potassium, phosphorous, zinc, alumi-
num, iron, manganese, copper, chromium, nickel, arsenic,
lead, boron, cobalt, and molybdenum.
Specifications: Prepared in cooperation with NSI Technolo-
gy Services Corp., Corvallis, OR. 16p.
Subject Index keywords: Water pollution, Water chemistry,
Metals, Ions, Quantitative analysis.
1283 OSWER Source Book: Training and Technology
Transfer Resources
Order Number PB92-102169CDH, price: PC A13/MF A03
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; May 91
The "OSWER Source Book consolidates information on the
numerous training and other technology transfer resources
sponsored by EPA's Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
Response (OSWER) and others. The OSWER Source Book
provides descriptions of training courses, videos and publica-
tions of interest to Federal and State personnel working in
solid and hazardous waste management. The OSWER
Source Book should be especially useful to Federal person-
nel working in programs under authorities of the RCRA,
CERCLA, SARA, or other similar Federal environmental man-
agement and restoration programs.
Specifications: 297p.
Subject index keywords: Technology transfer, Hazardous
materials, Waste management, Superfund, Training, Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response.
1284 OSWER Source Book. Volume 1. Training and
Technology Transfer Resources, 1992-1993
Order Number PB93-143980CDH, price: PC A10/MF A03
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Sep 92
Volumes I and II of The OSWER Source Book provide infor-
mation on the many training courses, publications, video-
tapes, and information systems and software available to
support EPA staff, State and local agencies, and others in-
volved in managing the Nation's hazardous and solid waste
programs. The Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Re-
sponse's (OSWER) Technology Innovation Office (TIO) has
compiled listings of the most significant training and technol-
ogy transfer resources available to assist individuals with the
responsibility for accomplishing OSWER's mission. Volume I
of The Source Book contains listings of OSWER and other
office training courses, publications, videotapes, information
systems and software, and support programs devoted to
hazardous and solid waste issues.
Specifications: See also Volume 2, PB93-144129 and
PB92-102169. 206p.
Subject index keywords: Technology transfer, Hazardous
materials, Waste management, Superfund, Training, Bibliog-
raphies, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response.
1285 OSWER Source Book. Volume 2. Training and
Technology Transfer Resources, 1992-1993
Order Number PB93-144129CDH, price: PC A11/MF A03
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Sep 92
Volumes I and II of The OSWER Source Book provide infor-
mation on the many training courses, publications, video-
tapes, and information systems and software available to
support EPA staff, State and local agencies, and others in-
volved in managing the Nation's hazardous and solid waste
programs. The Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Re-
sponse's (OSWER) Technology Innovation Office (TIO) has
compiled listings of the most significant training and technol-
ogy transfer resources available to assist individuals with the
responsibility for accomplishing OSWER's mission. Volume II
contains frequently requested OSW publications, including
those that address municipal solid waste and recycling. This
second volume of The Source Book is new for this edition,
and provides much additional information compared to the
earlier version.
Specifications: See also Volume 1, PB93-143980. 236p.
Subject index keywords: Technology transfer, Hazardous
materials, Waste management, Superfund, Training, Bibliog-
raphies, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response.
1286 Personnel Protection through Reconnaissance
Robotics at Superfund Remedial Sites
Order Number PB92-166743CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk
Reduction Engineering Lab; c1992
Investigation, mitigation, arid clean-up of hazardous materials
at Superfund sites normally require on-site workers to per-
form hazardous and sometimes potentially dangerous func-
tions. Such functions include site surveys and the reconnais-
sance for airborne and buried toxic environmental contami-
nants. Workers conducting on-site air monitoring risk dermal,
ocular and inhalation exposure to hazardous chemicals, while
those performing excavations also risk in addition the poten-
tial exposure to fire, explosion, and other physical injury.
EPA's current efforts to protect its workers and mitigate
these risks include the use of robotic devices. Using robots
offers the ultimate in personnel protection by removing the
worker from the site of potential exposure. The paper de-
scribes the demonstration of a commercially-available robotic
platform modified and equipped for air monitoring and the
ongoing research for the development of a ground penetrat-
ing radar (GPR) system to detect buried chemical waste
drums. These robotic devices can be ultimately routinely de-
244
-------
TECHNOLOGY POLICY & ADMINISTRATION:
Miscellaneous Policy & Program Documents
ployed in the field for the purpose of conducting inherently
safe reconnaissance activities during Superfund/SARA reme-
dial operations.
Specifications: Pub. in Jnl. of Air and Waste Management
Association, v42 n3 p341-345 Mar 92. See also PB90-
134164. 6p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Robotics, Occupation-
al safety and health, Air pollution monitoring, Hazardous ma-
terials.
1287 Physical/Chemical Treatment of Hazardous Waste
Sites: Speaker Slide Copies and Supporting Information
Order Number PB91-145433CDH, price: PC A11/MF A02
PEER Consultants, Inc., Dayton, OH.; Environmental
Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Center for Environmental
Research Information; Apr 90
Contents: Process-Based Treatment Decision Making; Treat-
ability Studies and Data Quality Objectives; Material Handling
Including Debris Separation and Decontamination; Separa-
tion of Inorganic Contaminants from Soils and Sludges; Sep-
aration and Treatment of Inorganics in Aqueous Matrices-
Separation of Organic Contaminants from Soils and Sludges-
Separation and Treatment of Organics in Liquids; Collection
and Treatment of Gases; Databases Supporting Technology
Selections.
Specifications: Also available from Supt. of Docs. Spon-
sored by Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH
Center for Environmental Research Information. 243p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Separation
Waste treatment, Meetings.
1288 Pilot-Scale Incinerability Evaluation of Arsenic-and
Lead-Contaminated Soils from Two Superfund Sites
Order Number PB91-226308CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Acurex Corp., Jefferson, AR.; Environmental Protection
Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk Reduction Engineering Lab;
199"!
Two incineration test programs were conducted at EPA's In-
cineration Research Facility to evaluate the suitability of in-
cineration as an option to treat contaminated Superfund site
soils. The soils from the Purity Oil Sales site in Region 9 are
contaminated with lead, up to several percent sulfur, and, to
a lesser extent, hazardous organic constituents. The soil
from the Baird and McGuire Superfund site in Region 1 is
contaminated with pesticides, arsenic, and, to a lesser
extent, lead. Incineration could be considered applicable to
the treatment of the three Purity Oil Sales site soils tested
based on effective semivolatile organic decontamination, in-
compliance (with federal standards) paniculate emissions,
and low SO2/SO3 emissions. However, these tests results
suggest that the resulting kiln ash would be a toxicity charac-
teristic hazardous waste due to its teachable lead content.
Similarly, for the Baird and McGuire site soils, organic decon-
tamination of the tested materials was effective. Between 36
and 76 percent of the measured arsenic and between 69
and 94 percent of the measured lead were discharged in the
kiln bottom ash depending on kiln temperature. The low
TCLP teachability of the lead in the kiln bottom ash was not
affected by the test variables kiln temperatures and kiln exit
flue gas O2. However, the ash arsenic resulting from high
excess air operation was significantly less teachable than
that from low excess air operation, and was somewhat more
teachable at high temperature than at low temperature.
Specifications: Proceedings of the Incineration Conference,
Knoxville, TN., May 13-17, 1991. Sponsored by Environmen-
tal Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk Reduction Engi-
neering Lab. 12p.
Subject index keywords: Waste disposal, Soil contamina-
tion, Incineration, Superfund, Air pollution control.
1289 Pilot-Scale Incineration of Contaminated Sludges
from the Bofors-Nobel Superfund Site
Order Number PB93-141034CDH, price: PC A17/MF A03
Acurex Environmental Corp., Jefferson, AR.; Environmental
Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk Reduction
Engineering Lab; Jan 93
A detailed test program was performed at the U.S. EPA In-
cineration Research Facility to help determine the effective-
ness of incineration in treating two contaminated lagoon
sludges from the Bofors-Nobel Superfund Site in Muskegon,
Ml. The sludges tested were contaminated with various or-
ganic contaminants and trace metals. Three incineration
tests were conducted for each sludge, for a total of six tests,
in the facility's rotary kiln incineration system. Test results
suggested that incineration under the conditions tested rep-
resented an effective treatment option for both sludges. Par-
ticulate emissions at the scrubber exit were high during incin-
eration of one of the sludges while cadmium and lead collec-
tion efficiencies were low. This suggested the wet scrubber
system may not be an appropriate choice for air pollution
control.
Specifications: Sponsored by Environmental Protection
Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk Reduction Engineering Lab.
378p.
Subject index keywords: Sludge, Incinerators, Pilot plants,
Waste treatment, Incineration Research Facility, Superfund.
1290 Pilot-Scale Incineration of Contaminated Soil from
the Purity Oil Sales and McColl Superfund Sites
Order Number PB92-105857CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
Acurex Corp., Jefferson, AR.; Environmental Protection
Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk Reduction Engineering Lab;
Nov 91
An incineration test program was conducted at the U.S. Envi-
ronmental Protection Agency's Incineration Research Facility
to evaluate the potential of incineration as an option to treat
contaminated soils at the Purity Oil Sales Superfund site in
Fresno, California, and the McColl Superfund site in Fuller-
ton, California. The soils from these sites are contaminated
with up to several percent sulfur and with some hazardous
organic contaminates. The Purity site has lead contamination
from 760 to 10,200 mg/kg. The tests were conducted in a
pilot-scale rotary kiln using a single stage ionizing wet scrub-
ber for exhaust particulate control. Test results suggest that
incineration would be an acceptable treatment option for the
McColl site materials.
Specifications: See also PB88-239223 and PB89-148076.
Sponsored by Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati,
OH. Risk Reduction Engineering Lab. 74p.
Subject index keywords: Soils, Incinerators, Waste treat-
ment, Hazardous materials.
245
-------
TECHNOLOGY POLICY & ADMINISTRATION:
Miscellaneous Policy & Program Documents
1291 Pilot-Scale Incineration of PCB-Contaminated
Sediments from the Hot Spot of the New Bedford
Harbor Superfund Site
Order Number PB92-227321CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Acurex Corp., Jefferson, AR. Incineration Research Facility.;
Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk
Reduction Engineering Lab; 1992
Testing was performed at the EPA's Incineration Research
Facility (IRF) to determine the incinerability of contaminated
marine sediment from the Hot Spot in the New Bedford
Harbor Superfund Site, the contaminants at this site were
PCBs, at concentrations up to > 200,000 mg/kb, and metals,
chiefly cadmium, chromium, copper, and lead, at concentra-
tions up to several hundred mg/kg. Sediments were inciner-
ated without dewatering. Tests were run on sediments spiked
with pure PCS transformer fluid and a brief period of oper-
ation with native sediment alone, or unspiked. Test results
suggest that incineration would be an effective treatment
option for the site sediments. However, sediment dewatering
prior to incineration and/or incinerating for a longer kiln
solids residence time might be required to produce a treated
sedijrient not contaminated by PCBs.
Specifications: Proceedings of the 1992 Incineration Con-
fererjce, Alburquerque, NM., May 11-14, 1992. See also
PB92-178953. Sponsored by Environmental Protection
Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk Reduction Engineering Lab.
10p.
Subject Index keywords: Superfund, Sediments, Waste dis-
posal, Incineration.
1292 Pilot-Scale Incineration of PCB-Contaminated
Sediments from the New Bedford Harbor Hot Spot
Superfund Site
Order Number PB92-178953CDH, price: PC A09/MF A03
Acurex Corp., Jefferson, AR. Incineration Research Facility.;
Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk
Reduction Engineering Lab; Apr 92
Testing was performed at the EPA's Incineration Research
Facility (IRF) to determine the incinerability of contaminated
marine sediment from the Hot Spot in the New Bedford
Harbor Superfund Site. The contaminants at the site were
PCBs, at concentrations up to <200,000 mg/kg, and metals,
chiefly cadmium, chromium, copper, and lead, at concentra-
tions up to several hundred mg/kg. Sediments were inciner-
ated without dewatering. Tests were run on sediments spiked
with pure PCS transformer fluid and a brief period of oper-
ation with native sediment alone, or unspiked. Kiln exit gas
temperature was varied from 824 to 984C (1515 to 1803F).
Greater than 99.9999% Destruction and Removal Efficiency
was^ achieved at both kiln temperatures with the afterburner
operated at 1200C (2206F), but the treated sediment was
still PCB-contaminated. The kiln ash accounted for about 80
to 90% of the discharged amount of copper and chromium
at both kiln temperatures. Kiln ash discharge accounted for
53% (low kiln temperature) and 20% (high kiln temperature)
of the lead and 61% (low kiln temperature) and 10 to 20%
(high kiln temperature) of the cadmium. Test results suggest
that incineration would be an effective treatment option for
the site sediments. However, sediment dewatering prior to in-
cineration and/or incinerating for a longer kiln solids resi-
dence time might be required to produce a treated sediment
not contaminated by PCBs.
Specifications: See also PB84-128677, PB87-120291 and
PB91-120006. Sponsored by Environmental Protection
Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk Reduction Engineering Lab.
194p.
Subject index keywords: Waste disposal, Incineration, Haz-
ardous materials, Superfund, Sediments.
1293 Potential for Joint Research between EPA and the
U.S. Army
Order Number PB93-149227CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk
Reduction Engineering Lab; 1992
The environmental problems being faced by the US Environ-
mental Protection Agency (EPA) and the US Army are close-
ly related, and the research needed to address them over-
laps in many areas. The paper presents an overview of the
hazardous waste site remediation research programs being
conducted by EPA's Risk Reduction Engineering Laboratory
(RREL) and proposes a number of areas where joint efforts
between the two agencies could be mutually beneficial. EPA
has established a policy of encouraging the use of innovative
technologies that both reduce the quantity of contaminant to
be handled and also destroy harmful contaminants. Several
technologies, including soil washing, soil vapor extraction,
thermal desorption, solvent extraction and soil flushing are of
special interest. The RREL has established capabilities for
treatability studies and other research endeavors at a
number of its locations. EPA also continues to foster the use
of innovative technologies through its Superfund Innovative
Technology Evaluation (SITE) program. In addition, EPA has
established a technology transfer program available to other
agencies involving both manuals/documents and training
personnel. The authors welcome future contacts by Army
personnel interested in sharing environmental projects.
Specifications: See also PB90-182486, PB90-249772 and
PB92-166859. Presented at the 1992 U.S. Army Annual R
and D Symposium, Williamsburg, VA., June 1992. 26p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Remedial
action, Research, Waste management, Technology transfer.
1294 Resources Conservation Company B.E.S.T. (Trade
Name) Solvent Extraction Technology: Application
Analysis Report
Order Number PB94-105434CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
Science Applications International Corp., Cincinnati, OH.;
Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk
Reduction Engineering Lab; Jun 93
The report summarizes the findings of an evaluation of the
Basic Extractive Sludge Treatment (B.E.S.T.) solvent extrac-
tion technology developed by Resources Conservation Com-
pany (RCC). During the demonstration test, the B.E.S.T.
system was used to treat composited sediments from two
areas of the Grand Calumet River. Contaminant concentra-
tion reductions of 96 percent for total polynuclear aromatic
hydrocarbons (PAHs) and greater than 99 percent for total
polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) were achieved for Sedi-
ment A. Contaminant concentration reductions of greater
than 99 percent for total PAHs and greater than 99 percent
for total PCBs were achieved for Sediment B. Removal effi-
ciencies in excess of 98 percent were realized for both sedi-
ments for oil and grease (O&G).
246
-------
TECHNOLOGY POLICY & ADMINISTRATION:
Miscellaneous Policy & Program Documents
Specifications: Sponsored by Environmental Protection
Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk Reduction Engineering Lab.
o9p.
Subject index keywords: Solvent extraction, Sludge treat-
ment, Hazardous materials.
1295 Retech, Inc., Plasma Centrifugal Furnace:
Applications Analysis Report
Order Number PB92-218791CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
Science Applications International Corp., San Diego, CA.;
Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk
Reduction Engineering Lab; Jun 92
The document is an evaluation of the performance of the
Retech Inc. Plasma Centrifugal Furnace (PCF) and its appli-
cability as a treatment technique for soils contaminated with
organic and/or inorganic compounds. Both the technical and
economic aspects of the technology were examined. A dem-
onstration of the Retech furnace was conducted under the
Superfund Innovative Technology Evaluation Program at the
Department of Energy's Component Development and Inte-
gration Facility in Butte, Montana. Operational data, along
with sampling and analysis information, were carefully com-
piled to establish a data base against which other available
data, as well as the vendor's claims for the technology, have
been compared and evaluated. Conclusions concerning the
technology's suitability for use in immobilizing contaminants
in the feed soil were reached, and extrapolations regarding
applications at other sites with different contaminants and
soil types were made.
Specifications: See also PB92-216035 and PB92-216043.
Sponsored by Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati
OH. Risk Reduction Engineering Lab. 52p.
Subject index keywords: Plasma furnaces, Incinerators,
Waste disposal, Hazardous materials, Combustion efficiency
Technology utilization.
1296 Risk Reduction Engineering Laboratory Site
Remediation Technical Support Program: FY92 Annual
Report
Order Number PB93-217651CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Science Applications International Corp., Cincinnati, OH.;
Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk
Reduction Engineering Lab; Mar 93
The Risk Reduction Engineering Laboratory is responsible for
planning, implementing, and managing research, develop-
ment, and demonstration programs to provide an authorita-
tive, defensible engineering basis in support of the policies
programs, and regulations of the EPA with respect to drink-
ing water, wastewater, pesticides, toxic substances, solid and
hazardous wastes, and Superfund-related activities. The pub-
lication is one of the products of that research and provides
a vital communication link between the researcher and the
user community. The report summarizes the activities and
accomplishments of the Laboratory in providing technical
support to EPA Regional Offices and others on contaminated
soil site remediation engineering problems.
Specifications: Sponsored by Environmental Protection
Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk Reduction Engineering Lab.
19p.
Subject index keywords: US EPA, Hazardous materials
Test facilities, Risk Reduction Engineering Laboratory.
1297 Rotating Biological Contactors. Engineering Bulletin
Order Number PB92-235936CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Oct 92
Rotating biological contactors employ aerobic fixed-film treat-
ment to degrade either organic and/or nitrogenous (ammo-
nia-nitrogen) constituents present in aqueous waste streams.
Fixed-film systems provide a surface to which the biomass
can adhere. Treatment is achieved as the waste passes by
the media, enabling fixed-film systems to acclimate biomass
capable of degrading organic waste. Fixed-film rotating bio-
logical contactor reactors provide a surface to which soil or-
ganisms can adhere; many indigenous soil organisms are ef-
fective degraders of hazardous wastes. The bulletin provides
information on the technology applicability, the technology
limitations, a description of the technology, the types of re-
siduals produced, site requirements, the latest performance
data, the status of the technology, and sources of further in-
formation.
Specifications: See also PB87-146296. 10p.
Subject index keywords: Biological treatment, Superfund,
Waste treatment, Liquid wastes, Rotating biological contac-
tors.
1298 Selection of Control Technologies for Remediation
of Lead Battery Recycling Sites. (Engineering Bulletin)
Order Number PB93-121333CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Foster Wheeler Enviresponse, Inc., Edison, NJ.;
Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk
Reduction Engineering Lab; Sep 92
The objective of this bulletin is to provide remedial project
managers (RPMs), potentially responsible parties (PRPs),
and their supporting contractors with information to facilitate
the selection of treatment alternatives and cleanup services
at lead battery recycling sites (LBRS). This bulletin con-
denses and updates the information presented in the EPA
technical resource document (TRD) entitled, 'Selection of
Control Technologies for Remediation of Lead Battery Recy-
cling Sites,' PB92-114537, July 1991. This bulletin consoli-
dates useful information on LBRS, such as the following: de-
scription of types of operations commonly conducted, and
wastes generated at LBRS; technologies implemented or se-
lected for LBRS remediation; case studies of treatability stud-
ies on LBRS wastes; past experience regarding the recycla-
bility of materials that are found at LBRS; and profiles of po-
tentially applicable innovative treatment technologies.
Specifications: See also PB92-114537. Sponsored by Envi-
ronmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk Reduction
Engineering Lab. 20p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Remedial action,
Waste management, Lead acid batteries, Waste treatment.
1299 SITE Demonstration of the American Combustion
Pyretron Oxygen-Enhanced Burner
Order Number PB91-196246CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk
Reduction Engineering Lab; c1989
A demonstration of the American Combustion Pyretron (TM)
oxygen-enhanced burner was conducted under the Super-
fund Innovative Technology Evaluation (SITE) program. The
Demonstration was conducted at the U.S. EPA's Combustion
Research Facility (CRF) in Jefferson, Arkansas. An eight
week test series was conducted which involved burning a
247
-------
TECHNOLOGY POLICY & ADMINISTRATION:
Miscellaneous Policy & Program Documents
mixture of listed waste K087 with contaminated soil from the
Stringfellow Acid Pits under both oxygen enhancement and
air-only conditions. Performance under both modes of oper-
ation was compared. Results show that the Pyretron operat-
ing with oxygen enhancement could meet RCRA emissions
(imitations at a throughput rate double that for air-only oper-
ation. Scrubber liquor and kiln ash from the tests contained
no detectable levels of contaminants from either waste
stream. (Copyright (c) 1989 Air and Waste Management As-
sociation.)
Specifications: Pub. in Jnl. of the Air and Waste Manage-
ment Association, v39 n2 p149-153 Feb 89. 7p.
Subject index keywords: Incinerators, Air pollution abate-
ment, Waste disposal, Air pollution control equipment, Super-
fund Innovative Technology Evaluation Program, Pyretron
burners.
1300 SITE Demonstration of the Basic Extractive Sludge
Treatment Process
Order Number PB94-101805CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Science Applications International Corp., Cincinnati, OH.;
Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk
Reduction Engineering Lab; c1993
The Superfund Innovative Technology Evaluation (SITE) Pro-
gram planned and executed a pilot-scale evaluation of the
B.E.S.T. process on sediment samples obtained from the
Grand Calumet River. Two separate sampling locations were
selected based upon previous data. One location had sedi-
ments with total polychlorinated biphenyl (PCB) concentra-
tions averaging 10 mg/kg, and total polynuclear aromatic hy-
drocarbon (PAH) concentrations averaging 520 mg/kg. The
other location had sediments with average total PCB and
PAH concentrations of 427 mg/kg and 72,000 mg/kg re-
spectively. Results showed that, of the samples which had
low original contamination concentrations, 96% of the PAHs
and 99% of the PCBs were removed following seven se-
quential extractions. Treated samples which had high original
contaminant concentrations were found to have removal effi-
ciencies of 99% for both PAHs and PCBs. (Copyright (c)
1993 Air & Waste Management Association.)
Specifications: P=ub. in Jnl. of Air and Waste Management
Association, v43 n9 p1274-1279 Sep 93. See also PB93-
131795. Sponsored by Environmental Protection Agency,
Cincinnati, OH. Risk Reduction Engineering Lab. 8p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Water pollution con-
trol, Sludge treatment.
1301 SITE Demonstration of the CF Systems Organics
Extraction System
Order Number PB91-145110CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk
Reduction Engineering Lab.; Science Applications
International Corp., McLean, VA.**Vermont Agency of
Natural Resources, Waterbury; c1990
The CF Systems Organic Extraction System was used to
remove PCBs from contaminated sediment dredged from the
New Bedford Harbor. This work was done as part of a field
demonstration under the Superfund Innovative Technology
Evaluation (SITE) program. The purpose of the SITE program
is to provide an independent and objective evaluation of in-
novative processes. The purpose of this paper is to present
the results of the SITE demonstration of this technology. Re-
sults of the demonstration tests show that the system, which
uses high pressure liquefied propane, successfully removed
PCBs from contaminated sediments in New Bedford Harbor.
Removal efficiencies for all test runs exceeded 70%. Some
operational problems occured during the demonstration
which may have affected the efficiency with which PCBs
were removed from the dredged sediment. Large amounts of
residues were generated from the demonstration. Costs for
using this process are estimated to be between $150/ton
and $450/ton. (Copyright (c) 1990-Air & Waste Management
Association.)
Specifications: Pub. in Jnl. of Air and Waste Management
Association, v40 n6 p926-931 Jun 90. Prepared in coopera-
tion with Science Applications International Corp., McLean,
VA., and Vermont Agency of Natural Resources, Waterbury.
8p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste treatment,
Dredge spoil, Water pollution control, Solvent extraction, Pol-
ychlorinated biphenyls.
1302 Site Emerging Technologies: Bioscrubber for
Removing Hazardous Organic Emissions from Soil,
Water and Air Decontamination Processes
Order Number PB93-227205CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
Aluminum Co. of America, Pittsburgh, PA.; Environmental
Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk Reduction
Engineering Lab; Aug 93
An engineered biofilter was developed to digest hazardous
organic emissions from soil, water and air decontamination
processes. A bench scale unit was tested for over 11
months for the removal of low levels of toluene in air under
the SITE Emerging Technology Program. The bioscrubber
contains a selected activated carbon medium to support mi-
crobial growth. The bioscrubber was designed for large vol-
umes of air streams containing trace volatile organics.
Almost complete removal of hazardous organics was demon-
strated. Comparing with other biofilters using compost or
other naturally occurred media, the use of activated carbon
in the bioscrubber enhanced the degradation efficiency sub-
stantially for the test performed.
Specifications: Sponsored by Environmental Protection
Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk Reduction Engineering Lab.
70p.
Subject index keywords: Filtration, Microorganisms, Scrub-
bers, Air pollution control.
1303 SITE Emerging Technologies Project: Babcock and
Wilcox Cyclone Vitrification
Order Number PB93-163038CDH, price: PC A07/MF A02
Babcock and Wilcox Co., Alliance, OH. Contract Research
Div.; Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk
Reduction Engineering Lab; Mar 93
The Babcock and Wilcox 6 million Btu/hr pilot cyclone fur-
nace was successfully used in a 2-year SITE Emerging Tech-
nology project to melt and vitrify and EPA Synthetic Soil
Matrix (SSM) spiked with 7,000 ppm lead, 1,000 ppm cadmi-
um, and 1,500 ppm chromium. An advantage of vitrification
over other thermal treatment technologies is that in addition
to destruction of organic wastes, the resulting vitrified prod-
uct captures and does not leach non-volatile heavy metals.
Indeed, when operated at 50 to 150 Ib/hr of dry SSM feed,
and from 100-300 Ib/hr of wet SSM feed, the cyclone tech-
nology was able to produce a non-leachable product (as
measured by TCLP) from the hazardous soil. From 95 to 97
percent of the dry, input SSM was incorporated within the
248
-------
TECHNOLOGY POLICY & ADMINISTRATION:
Miscellaneous Policy & Program Documents
slag. Stable cyclone operation was achieved during the 2-
year project which processed over 6 tons of clean, unspiked
SSM and 5 tons of spiked SSM. During the thermal vitrifica-
tion process, the heavy metals in the slag was found to in-
crease with increasing feed rate and with decreasing metal
volatility. The treatment of the synthetic soil matrix resulted
in a volume reduction of 25-35 percent (dry basis) Vitrifica-
tion results in an easily-crushed, glassy product.
Specifications: See also PB90-172545, PB91-120006 and
PB93-145621. Sponsored by Environmental Protection
Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk Reduction Engineering Lab.
loTp.
Subject index keywords: Waste treatment, Vitrification
Hazardous materials, Remedial action, Heat treatment Su-
perfund Innovative Technology Evaluation Program, Innova-
tive treatment technologies.
1304 Small Systems Meet Superfund Challenge with
Pomt-of-Entry Treatment Units
Order Number PB93-141109CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk
*/,? **nl°n En9'neering Lab.; NSF International, Ann Arbor,
Ml. PSARA Technologies, Inc., Cincinnati, OH; Dec 91
Several small systems and individual homeowners have been
faced with the task of treating their groundwater that has
been contaminated with various organic contaminants. Con-
tamination is such that the locations described in this presen-
tation have been designated Federal Superfund sites under-
going emergency or remedial actions. These sites have uti-
lized pomt-of-entry water treatment devices to treat their
groundwater. The devices used include: single and dual
granular activated carbon (GAG) columns; air stripping in
series with GAG; and ozone/UV followed by GAG. Cost (cap-
ital and operating) contaminant removal performance GAG
breakthrough and disinfection byproduct formation will be
discussed for several Superfund or state led cleanup actions.
Specifications: Proceedings of the Hazardous Materials
Control/Superfund Conference, Washington, DC., December
3-5 1991. See also PB89-195010. Prepared in cooperation
with NSF International, Ann Arbor, Ml., and PSARA Technol-
ogies, Inc., Cincinnati, OH. 9p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Water treatment, Pota-
ble water, Waste disposal, Hazardous materials, Small sys-
tems, Point of entry treatment.
1305 Solvent Extraction Processes: A Survey of Systems
in the SITE Program
Order Number PB93-131795CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk
Reduction Engineering Lab.; Science Applications
International Corp., Cincinnati, OH; c1992
Solvent extraction of contaminated soils, sludges and sedi-
ments has been successfully completed at a number of Su-
perfund sites. Each commercialized process uses a unique
operating system to extract organic contaminants from
solids. These operating systems may' be classified by the
properties of the solvents each utilizes: (1) standard sol-
vents, (2) near-critical fluids/liquified gases, and (3) critical
solution temperature solvents. The paper discusses pretreat-
ment and posttreatment requirements, and discusses the op-
erating systems of the solvent extraction system currently in
the Superfund Innovative Technology Evaluation (SITE) Pro-
gram. Future demonstrations of these technologies by the
U.S. EPA's Superfund Innovative Technology Evaluation Pro-
gram will provide additional information regarding the efficacy
of these processes. Copyright (c) 1992 Air and Waste Man-
agement Association).
Specifications: Pub. in Jnl. of the Air and Waste Manage-
ment Association, v42 n8 p1118-1121 Aug 92. Prepared in
cooperation with Science Applications International Corp.,
Cincinnati, OH. 7p.
Subject index keywords: Solvent extraction, Superfund,
Soil treatment, Waste treatment, Organic compounds.
1306 Solvent Extraction Treatment
Order Number PB91-228015CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Science Applications International Corp., Cincinnati, OH.;
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 90
Solvent extraction does not destroy wastes, but is a means
of separating hazardous contaminants from soils, sludges,
and sediments, thereby reducing the volume of the hazard-
pus waste that must be treated. Generally it is used as one
in a series of unit operations, and can reduce the overall
cost for managing a particular site. It is applicable to organic
wastes and is generally not used for treating inorganics and
metals. The technology uses an organic chemical as a sol-
vent and differs from soil washing, which generally uses
water or water with wash improving additives. During 1989,
the technology was one of the selected remedies at six Su-
perfund sites. Commercial-scale units are in operation. There
is no clear solvent extraction technology leader by virtue of
the solvent employed, type of equipment used, or mode of
operation. The final determination of the lowest cost alterna-
tive will be more site specific than process equipment domi-
nated. Vendors should be contacted to determine the avail-
ability of a unit for a particular site. The bulletin provides in-
formation on the technology applicability, the types of residu-
als produced, the latest performance data, site requirements,
the status of the technology, and sources for further informa-
tion.
Specifications: Sponsored by Environmental Protection
Agency, Washington, DC. Office of Emergency and Remedial
Response. 10p.
Subject index keywords: Solvent extraction, Hazardous
materials, Waste treatment, Materials recovery, Organic com-
pounds.
1307 Summary of GIS Support to Superfund
Order Number PB93-963506CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Jun 93
The document describes four Superfund-related projects in-
volving the development of Geographic Information System
applications. It identifies the role of GIS technology within the
overall Superfund process and discusses the components of
GIS and integration with the Superfund process.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 62p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Geographic informa-
tion systems, Site surveys.
249
-------
TECHNOLOGY POLICY & ADMINISTRATION:
Miscellaneous Policy & Program Documents
1308 Superfund Engineering Issue: Issues Affecting the
Applicability and Success of Remedial/Removal
Incineration Projects
Order Number PB92-109081CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
PEI Associates, Inc., Cincinnati, OH.; Environmental
Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of Emergency
and Remedial Response; Feb 91
Incineration has been a recommended method for disposing
of hazardous materials, and its use in the Superfund Program
is increasing rapidiyi It has become one of the most often
selected methods for treating hazardous constituents found
at Superfund sites. Because of the increased reliance of Su-
perfund decision makers on incineration, the Engineering
Forum has identified the informed evaluation of incineration
as a remedy, and the issues inherent in its implementation
as a high priority. The paper was prepared by RREL's Engi-
neering and Treatment Technical Support Center, under the
technical direction of Laurel Staley (RREL) and Paul Leonard
{Region III), with the support of the Superfund Technical
Support Project.
Specifications; Sponsored by Environmental Protection
Agency, Washington, DC. Office of Emergency and Remedial
Response. 30p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Remedial action, Haz-
ardous, materials, Waste disposal, Incineration.
1309 Superfund Innovative Technology Evaluation
Program: Annual Report to Congress 1992
Order Number PB94-123874CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk
Reduction Engineering Lab; Oct 93
The SITE Program was created to meet the increased
demand for alternative hazardous waste treatment technol-
ogies and was the first major program for demonstrating and
evaluating full-scale, innovative treatment technologies at
hazardous waste sites. The report discusses the Program's
progress and accomplishments over the past fiscal year, out-
lines the Program's impact, and catalogues current projects
being undertaken.
Specifications: See also PB93-126613. 56p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Demonstration pro-
grams, SITE(Superfund Innovative Technology Evaluation).
1310 Superfund Innovative Technology Evaluation
Program Demonstration Plan for Westinghouse Bio-
Analytic Systems Pentachlorophenol Immunoassays
Order Number PB92-170190CDH, price: PC A08/MF A02
Lockheed Engineering and Sciences Co., Inc., Las Vegas,
NV.; Environmental Monitoring Systems Lab., Las Vegas,
NV.* Environmental Protection Agency, Las Vegas, NV; 14
Apr 92
The plan provides a detailed design and description of the
demonstration and evaluation program for the Westinghouse
Bio-Analytic Systems immunoassay technologies specific for
the analysis of pentachlorophenol. The immunoassays meas-
ure parts per billion concentrations of pentachlorophenol in
water. The demonstration is being conducted under the Su-
perfund Innovative Technology Evaluation (SITE) Program. It
is expected that proper execution of the demonstration plan
will provide information that enables data users and review-
ers to assess the performance of the technology in terms of
its usefulness and limitations for the Superfund Program. The
main focus of the demonstration is to evaluate on site a se-
miquantitative immunoassay field analysis kit for its utility as
a rapid field screening tool. The results obtained from the
field kit analyses will be compared to those obtained from a
quantitative high-sample-capacity plate immunoassay also
developed by Westinghouse Bio-Analytic Systems. In addi-
tion, both immunoassay techniques will be compared to the
standard gas chromatography/mass spectrometry procedure
for pentachlorophenol determination. The quality assurance
plan for the demonstration is provided in an appendix.
Specifications: Prepared in cooperation with Environmental
Monitoring Systems Lab., Las Vegas, NV. Sponsored by En-
vironmental Protection Agency, Las Vegas, NV. 157p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Pentachlorophenol,
Immunoassay, Westinghouse, Chemical water pollutants, Su-
perfund Innovative Technology Evaluation Program(SITE).
1311 Superfund Innovative Technology Evaluation
Program: Progress and Accomplishments, Fiscal Year
1989. A Third Report to Congress
Order Number PB90-216516CDH, price: PC A05/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Mar 90
This is the third Report to Congress on the Superfund Inno-
vative Technology Evaluation (SITE) Program. The report
summarizes the progress, accomplishments, and results of
the SITE Program through 1989. Field demonstrations for
eight projects have been completed since publication of the
first report. The second Report to Congress focuses on the
completed demonstrations and provides performance data
and results. The process used to assess the economic feasi-
bility of each demonstration is presented. The report de-
scribes the progress of the components that were initiated
during the first year of the program and the two components
implemented during the past year. Another difference be-
tween the two reports is that the second Report to Congress
identifies the impediments encountered during the first 3
years of the program and describes the refinements that
EPA has implemented to address these problems and im-
prove the effectiveness of the SITE Program.
Specifications: See also PB89-215214. 83p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste treat-
ment, Superfund Innovative Technology Evaluation Program,
Waste management, Remedial action.
1312 Superfund Innovative Technology Evaluation
Program: Progress and Accomplishments, Fiscal Year
1990. A Fourth Report to Congress
Order Number PB92-224799CDH, price: PC A05/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 91
The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) established
the Superfund Innovative Technology Evaluation (SITE) Pro-
gram in 1986, following passage of the Superfund Amend-
ments and Reauthorization Act (SARA). The Program's
progress and accomplishments for Fiscal Year 1990 are pre-
sented in four sections in this Fourth Report to Congress.
Section 1 presents an overview of the SITE Program includ-
ing the statutory authority and history of the program and the
four program components and goals. Section 2 discusses
the use of innovative alternative technologies for hazardous
waste site remediation and the impact the SITE Program is
having on their increased use. Section 3 presents the SITE
Program's progress and accomplishments over the past year
and specific goals for the coming year. Section 4 proposes
250
-------
various program changes and recommends statutory
changes that can enhance SITE'S ability to meet its overall
objectives. Several examples of program products are ap-
pended to this report to highlight the technology transfer as-
pects of the SITE Program.
Specifications: See also PB90-216516. 86p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Remedial
action, Technology innovation, Waste treatment, Superfund
Innovative Technology Evaluation Program, Innovative treat-
ment technologies.
1313 Superfund Innovative Technology Evaluation
Program: Progress and Accomplishments Fiscal Year
1991. A 5th Report to Congress
Order Number PB93-126613CDH, price: PC A05/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk
Reduction Engineering Lab; Oct 92
The Superfund Innovative Technology Evaluation (SITE) pro-
gram was the first major program for demonstrating and
evaluating full-scale innovative treatment technologies at
hazardous waste sites. Having concluded its fifth year, the
SITE program is recognized as a leading advocate of innova-
tive technology development and commercialization for haz-
ardous waste treatment and remediation. In addition, through
the demonstration of innovative monitoring and measurement
technologies, EPA is promoting faster, more cost-effective
site characterization and post-cleanup monitoring methods
for Superfund and Resource Conservation and Recovery Act
(RCRA) corrective action sites. The fifth report to Congress
documents the impact of the SITE program through discuss-
ing the program's progress and accomplishments over the
past year. The report also sets goals for the coming years
and makes specific recommendations on achieving these
goals.
Specifications: See also PB92-224799. 82p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste treat-
ment, Remedial action, Innovative treatment technologies
Superfund Innovative Technology Evaluation Program.
1314 Superfund Innovative Technology Evaluation
Program: Spring Update to the Technology Profiles
Fourth Edition
Order Number PB92-233121CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Apr 92
The SITE Program promotes the development and imple-
mentation of innovative treatment technologies that (1)
reduce the toxicity, mobility, or volume of hazardous waste,
and (2) monitor the nature and extent of hazardous waste
site contamination. To accomplish these tasks, the SITE Pro-
gram consists of four interrelated programs: Demonstration
Program; Emerging Technology Program; Monitoring and
Measurement Technologies Program; and Technology Trans-
fer Program.
Specifications: See also;PB92-224294. 22p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste treat-
ment, Superfund.
TECHNOLOGY POLICY & ADMINISTRATION:
Miscellaneous Policy & Program Documents
1315 Superfund Innovative Technology Evaluation
Program: Technology Profiles, Fifth Edition
Order Number PB93-163053CDH, price: PC A18/MF A04
Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk
Reduction Engineering Lab; Nov 92
The Superfund Innovative Technology Evaluation (SITE) Pro-
gram evaluates new and promising treatment technologies
for cleanup of hazardous waste sites. The program was cre-
ated to encourage the development and routine use of inno-
vative treatment technologies. The document, prepared be-
tween June and October, 1992, is intended as a guide for
decisionmakers and others interested in technologies in the
SITE Demonstration, Emerging Technology, and Monitoring
and Measurement Technologies Programs. Reference tables
of SITE Program participants precede the individual profiles
and contain EPA and developer contacts. Inquiries about a
specific SITE technology or the SITE Program should be di-
rected to an EPA Project Manager. The two-page profiles are
presented by name of the developer in alphabetical order.
Each profile contains (1) a technology developer and proc-
ess name, (2) a technology description, (3) a discussion of
waste applicability, (4) a project status report, (5) EPA
Project Manager and developer contacts, and (6) a schemat-
ic diagram or photograph of the process. The profiles also
include summaries of demonstration results if available. New
features of this edition include a Table of Media Applicability
and a complete Index organized by Waste Media and Con-
taminant.
Specifications: See also PB92-224294. 413p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Remedial
action, Waste treatment, Superfund Innovative Technology
Evaluation Program, Innovative treatment technologies.
1316 Superfund Innovative Technology Evaluation
Program: Technology Profiles, Fourth Edition
Order Number PB92-224294CDH, price: PC A14/MF A03
Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk
Reduction Engineering Lab; Nov 91
The Superfund Innovative Technology Evaluation (SITE) Pro-
gram, now in its sixth year, is an integral part of EPA's re-
search into alternative cleanup methods for hazardous waste
sites around the nation. Under the SITE Program, EPA
enters into cooperative agreements with innovative technolo-
gy developers. The document profiles 129 demonstration,
emerging, and monitoring and measurement technologies
being evaluated under the SITE Program. Each technology
profile contains a description of the technology, a discussion
of its applicability to various wastes, an update on its devel-
opment or demonstration status, any available demonstration
results, and demonstration and technology contacts. This
document is intended for environmental decision makers and
other interested individuals involved in hazardous waste site
cleanup.
Specifications: See also PB90-249756. 216p.
Subject index keywords: Waste management, Technology
innovation, Remedial action, Superfund Innovative Technolo-
gy Evaluation Program, Cleanup operations.
251
-------
TECHNOLOGY POLICY & ADMINISTRATION:
Miscellaneous Policy & Program Documents
1317 Superfund Innovative Technology Evaluation
Program: Technology Profiles, November 1989
Ordej Number PB?p-249756CDH, price: PC A07/MF A01
PRClfinvlrpnmentaj Management, Inc., McLean, VA.;
Environmental 'Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Nov 89
The document profiles fifty-two demonstration and emerging
technologies being evaluated under the SITE program. Each
technology profile contains a description of the technology; a
discussion of its applicability to various wastes; and update
on its development or demonstration status; and any avail-
able demonstration results. The document is intended for
EPA regional decision-makers and other interested individ-
uals Involved In hazardous waste site cleanups.
Specifications: See also report for 1988, PB90-132690.
Sponsored by Environmental Protection Agency, Washington,
DC. Office of Emergency and Remedial Response. 129p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Site sur-
veys, Superfund, Remedial action, Technology assessment,
Waste management, Superfund Innovative Technology Eval-
uation Program, SITE program.
1318 Superfund Innovative Technology Evaluation
Program: Technology Profiles, Sixth Edition
Order Number PB94-123858CDH, price: PC A19/MF A04
PRO Environmental Management, Inc., Cincinnati, OH.;
Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk
Reduction Engineering Lab; Nov 93
The Superfund Innovative Technology Evaluation (SITE) Pro-
gram, now in its eighth year, is an integral part of EPA's re-
search into alternative cleanup methods for hazardous waste
sites around the nation. Under the SITE Program, EPA
enters into cooperative agreements with technology develop-
ers. These developers refine their innovative technologies at
bench- or pilot-scale and may demonstrate them, with sup-
port from EPA, at hazardous waste sites. The document pro-
files 170 demonstration, emerging, and monitoring and meas-
urement technologies being evaluated under the SITE Pro-
gram. Each profile describes the technology; discusses its
applicability to various wastes; discusses its development or
demonstration status and demonstration results, if available;
and provides demonstration and technology contacts.
Specifications: See also PB89-132690. Sponsored by Envi-
ronmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk Reduction
Engineering Lab. 438p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Hazardous materials,
Waste treatment, SITE(Superfund Innovative Technology
Evaluation).
1319 Superfund innovative Technology Evaluation (SITE):
Demonstration Bulletin. Flame Reactor, Horsehead
Resource Development Company, Inc
Order Number PB92-235613CDH, price: PC A01 /MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Aug 91
The Horsehead Resource Development Company, Inc.
(HRD) Flame Reactor is a patented and proven high temper-
ature thermal process designed to safely treat industrial resi-
dues and wastes containing metals. During processing, the
waste material is introduced into the hottest portion of the
Flame Reactor, where the wastes are subjected to a very hot
reducing gas (greater than 2000 C) produced from the com-
bustion of solid or gaseous hydrocarbon fuels in oxygen-en-
riched air. The metal vapors further react and cool in the
252
combustion chamber and cooling system to produce a metal-
enriched oxide that is collected in a baghouse. The resulting
metal oxides can be recycled to recover the metals. The
amount of waste reduction to slag and oxide depends on the
chemical and physical properties of the waste material.
Specifications: 4p.
Subject index keywords: Thermal reactors, Waste treat-
ment, High temperature tests, Slags, Superfund innovative
technology evaluation.
1320 Superfund Innovative Technology Evaluation (SITE)
Program Evaluation Report for Antox BTX Water Screen
(BTX Immunoassay)
Order Number PB93-218337CDH, price: PC A06/MF A02
Lockheed Engineering and Sciences Co., Las Vegas, NV.;
Environmental Monitoring Systems Lab., Las Vegas, NV; Jun
93
The results of a demonstration of a portable immunoassay
for the detection of benzene, toluene, and xylene(s) (BTX)
are described in the report. Seventy-nine field samples were
obtained from monitoring wells at several sites with gasoline
contaminated ground water. Sample splits were analyzed on-
site by the BTX immunoassay and in the laboratory by gas
chromatography (GC) using EPA Method 8020. The BTX im-
munoassay was rapid and simple to use. It performed well in
identifying high level contamination and gasoline contaminat-
ed samples having BTX concentrations greater than 100
ppb. It did not fully meet the claims of the developer of iden-
tifying contamination levels down to 25 ppb BTX. Two field
samples determined by GC to have between 25 and 100 ppb
BTX failed to be classified correctly by the immunoassay.
Results from quality assurance samples with BTX concentra-
tions of 2.5, 25, and 100 ppb also showed that false negative
results would be expected at higher than a 5 percent rate
when BTX contamination levels were between 25 and 100
ppb. However, for samples with higher BTX levels, the im-
munoassay gave excellent results. Two field samples yielded
false positive results compared to GC values, but these sam-
ples showed signs of low-level gasoline contamination.
Specifications: Sponsored by Environmental Monitoring
Systems Lab., Las Vegas, NV. 103p.
Subject index keywords: Water pollution detection, Ground
water, Immunoassay.
1321 Superfund Innovative Technology Evaluation (Site)
Report for the Westinghouse Bio-Analytic Systems
Pentachlorophenol (PCP) Immunoassays
Order Number PB92-188/13CDH, price: PC A06/MF A02
Lockheed Engineering ancl Sciences Co., Inc., Las Vegas,
NV. Environmental Programs Office.; Environmental
Monitoring Systems Lab., Las Vegas, NV; May 92
The results of the demonstration of two Westinghouse Bio-
Analytic Systems (WBAS) immunoassay technologies are de-
scribed in the report. The immunoassays measure parts per
billion concentrations of pentachlorophenol in environmental
water samples. The study was conducted under the Super-
fund innovative Technology Evaluation (SITE) Program and
designed to evaluate the ruggedness and utility of a semi-
quantitative immunoassay field kit. Results obtained from the
field kit were compared to those obtained from a quantita-
tive, high-sample-capacity plate immunoassay. The results of
the WBAS immunoassay demonstration support the conclu-
sion that the field immunoassay is a useful screening tool.
-------
TECHNOLOGY POLJCY & ADMIN)STRATK>N:
Miscellaneous Policy & Program Documents
The demonstration verified that the method can provide qual-
itative or semiquantitative screening information. Although
the results were more variable than had been anticipated
the incorporation of additional procedural precautions and
carefully chosen quality control acceptance criteria for on-
site analysis could improve performance substantially Both
immunoassays produced results biased high compared to
the GC/MS results, but the tendency was not large and may
have been partly due to loss during sample extraction (EPA
Method 3510) prior to analysis by gas chromatography/mass
spectrometry. The detection of structurally related com-
pounds by the immunoassays may have also contributed to
the high bias. The results indicate that the plate immunoas-
say is an accurate and precise method for quantitating pen-
tachlorophenol in water.
Specifications: Sponsored by Environmental Monitorinq
Systems Lab., Las Vegas, NV. 109p.
Subject index keywords: Pentachlorophenol.
1322 Superfund Innovative Technology Evaluation- The
Delaware SITE Study, 1989
Order Number PB92-125749CDH, price: PC A08/MF A02
NSI Technology Services Corp., Research Triangle Park
NC.; Battelle Columbus Labs., OH.*Environmental Protection
Agency, Washington, DC. Office of Emergency and Remedial
Response; Jan 92
The 1989 Delaware Superfund Innovative Technology Eval-
uation (SITE) Field Study was a cooperative effort between
the Atmospheric Research and Exposure Assessment Labo-
ratory and the Environmental Monitoring Systems Laboratory
located in Las Vegas, NV. The SITE was established to sat-
isfy the mandate of the Superfund Amendments and Reau-
tnonzation Act of 1986 to demonstrate alternative or innova-
tive treatment and site characterization technologies. As
such, the program provides for the predemonstration testing
of new monitoring technologies. A number of new technol-
ogies including sector sampling, temporal profile analysis
open air long path monitoring, and fence-line dosimetry were
employed in the 1989 study. The report documents the suc-
cessful use of these techniques and shows their potential to
provide the Agency and others with improved, cost-effective
means to monitor the air exposure pathway during Superfund
site assessment and remediation.
Specifications: Prepared in cooperation with Battelle Co-
lumbus Labs., OH. Sponsored by Environmental Protection
Agency, Washington, DC. Office of Emergency and Remedial
Response. 174p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Air pollution sampling,
Air pollution detection, Waste disposal, Volatile organic com-
pounds.
1323 Survey of Materials-Handling Technologies Used at
Hazardous Waste Sites
Order Number PB91-921283CDH, price: PC A11/MF A02
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Jun 91
The study summarizes the types of debris, material, and con-
taminants found at Superfund and other hazardous waste
sites and the materials-handling equipment and general pro-
cedures used to perform site restoration and cleanup The
report provides the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
(EPA) with information on state-of-the-art materials-handling
equipment and procedures useful for addressing difficult
site-specific, materials-handling problems.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 226p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Materials
handling, Site surveys, Technology utilization.
1324 Synopses of Federal Demonstrations of Innovative
Site Remediation Technologies
Order Number PB93-144111CDH, price: PC A11/MF A03
Federal Remediation Technologies Roundtable.;
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC.
Technology Innovation Office; Aug 92
The collection of abstracts, compiled by the Federal Remedi-
ation Technology Roundtable, describes field demonstrations
of innovative technologies to treat hazardous waste. This
document updates and expands information presented in the
first edition of the collection which was published in 1991.
The collection is intended to be an information resource for
hazardous waste site project managers for assessing the
availability and viability of innovative technologies for treating
contaminated ground water, soils, and sludge. This document
represents a starting point in the review of technologies
available for application to hazardous waste sites. This com-
pendium should not be looked upon as a sole source for this
information - it does not represent all innovative technol-
ogies nor all technology demonstrations performed by these
agencies. Only Federally sponsored studies and demonstra-
tions that have tested innovative remedial technologies with
site specific wastes under realistic conditions as a part of
large pilot- or full-scale field demonstrations are included.
Those studies included represent all that were provided to
the Federal Remediation Technology Roundtable at the time
of publication. Information collection efforts are ongoing.
Specifications: See also PB91-921284. Sponsored by Envi-
ronmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Technology
Innovation Office. 233p.
Subject index keywords: Technology innovation, Remedial
action, Hazardous materials, Waste treatment, Innovative
treatment technologies.
1325 Tech Trends Number 3, December 1990
Order Number PB93-206357CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC.
Technology Innovation Office; Dec 90
The edition of Tech Trends contains an insert, 'Innovations
in Monitoring and Measurement Technologies'. In it, EPA's
Environmental Monitoring Systems Laboratory in Las Vegas
showcases three portable monitoring systems. The EPA En-
vironmental Research Laboratory in Athens, Georgia, high-
lights a multispectral identification technique for nontarget
analytes that improves upon the current low resolution
system. The Athens lab also presents information on alterna-
tives to the Eh Probe for measuring mobility of heavy metals.
Ada introduces BIOPLUME II.
Specifications: See also PB93-206381. 12p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Technology invention,
Remedial action, Trends, News media.
253
-------
TECHNOLOGY POLICY & ADMINISTRATION:
Miscellaneous Policy & Program Documents
1326 Tech Trends Number 4, March 1991
Order Number PB93:206365CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC.
Technology Innovation Office; Mar 91
To meet the challenge of cleanup of Superfund sites at fed-
eral facilities, the U.S. Army Toxic and Hazardous Materials
Agency is devising innovative ways to treat wastes on site. In
this issue of Tech Trends, Cpt. Craig Myler tells about an in-
nova|iye Low Temperature Thermal Stripping process to
treat soil contaminated with cleaning solvents and fuels. The
process expends less energy and is lower in cost than incin-
eratioji.
Specifications: See also PB93-206373. 6p.
Subject Index keywords: Superfund, Technology invention,
Remedial action, Trends, News media.
1327 Tech Trends Number 5, May 1991
Order Number PB93-206373CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC.
Technology Innovation Office; May 91
The 'applied technologies journal for Superfund removals and
remedial actions and RCRA corrective actions contains arti-
cles on: Nitrate Enhanced Bioremediation; Debris Washing;
Air Emissions from Soil Excavation; and Chemical Reagent
at Lee Farm.
Specifications: See also PB93-206357. 6p.
Subject Index keywords: Superfund, Technology invention,
Remedial action, Trends.
1328 Tech Trends (Number 8)
Order Number PB92-221985CDH, price: PC A01/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Mar 92
The Department of Energy (DOE) has developed and dem-
onstrated an in situ air stripping technique that utilizes hori-
zontal wells to remove volatile organic solvents from soil and
groiirtdwater. The demonstration was part of the DOE's Sa-
vannah River Integrated Demonstration Program. At the site,
an abandoned process sewer line leaked trichloroethylene
and tetrachloroethylene Into soil and groundwater.
Specifications: 5p.
Subject index keywords: Strippers, Ground water, Water
wells.
1329 Tech Trends Number 9, June 1992
Order Number PB93-206381CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC.
Tecfino(ogy Innovation Office; Jun 92
The applied technologies journal for Superfund removals and
remedial actions arid RCRA corrective actions. In the issue,
the authors let you know about upcoming SITE demonstra-
tions you can visit this summer.
Specifications: See also PB93-206365, PB92-221985,
PB93-157626 and PB93:203958. 6p.
Subject Index keywords: Superfund, Technology invention,
Remedial action, Trends, News media.
1330 Tech Trends (Number 10)
Order Number PB93-203958CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Oct 92
Contents: Natural Biodegradation of Fuel Vapors in Unsatu-
rated Zone; Soil Washing Technology Demo at Toronto
Harbor; RCRA Treatability Study Opportunities; ATTIC Yields
Abundant Bioremediation Information; and an insert consist-
ing of a notice on Innovative Thermal Treatment Technol-
ogies: Uses and Applications for Site Remediation (two 4-
hour seminars).
Specifications: See also PB92-221985 and PB93-157627.
Errata sheet inserted. 8p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Remedial action,
Waste treatment, Land pollution control, Innovative treatment
technologies.
1331 Tech Trends (Number 11)
Order Number PB93-157626CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC.
Technology Innovation Office; Jan 93
Contents: Extraction process separates organics from
sludges, soils and sediments; Organics desorbed from soil
with low temperature thermal treatment; Evaporation/oxida-
tion system treats a variety of wastewater contaminants; An-
aerobic thermal processor completes second PCS remedi-
ation.
Specifications: See also PB92-221985. 6p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Technology invention,
Remedial action, Trends, Resource Conservation and Recov-
ery Act.
1332 Tech Trends: The Applied Technologies Journal for
Superfund Removals and Remedial Actions and RCRA
Corrective Actions, December 1993
Order Number PB94-149879CDH, price: PC A01/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Dec 93
Contents: Pneumatic fracturing increases volatile organic
compound (VOC) extraction rate; Soil washing technology re-
moves organics from fine and coarse grained soil, and; Elec-
tro-osmosis holds promise for in-situ extraction.
Specifications: See also PB93-223196. 5p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Remedial action,
Treatment innovation.
1333 Tech Trends: The Applied Technologies Journal for
Superfund Removals and Remedial Actions and RCRA
Corrective Actions. May 1993
Order.Number PB93-223196CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; May 93
Both the U.S. EPA and Environment Canada have programs
that support emerging innovative technology development
and technical evaluation demonstrations. EPA's Superfund
Innovative Technology Evaluation (SITE) Program and Envi-
ronment Canada's Development and Demonstration of Site
Remediation Technologies (DESRT) Program are described
in the study. The X*TRAX(TM) Model 200 Thermal Desorp-
tion System developed by Chemical Waste Management,
Inc., is a low-temperature process designed to separate or-
ganic contaminants from soils, sludges and other solid
media.
Specifications: See also PB93-206381 and PB93-157626.
10p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Technology invention,
Remedial action, Waste treatment, Thermal desorption.
254
-------
TECHNOLOGY POLICY & ADMINISTRATION:
Miscellaneous Policy & Program Documents
1334 Technical Guidance Document: Construction Quality
Management for Remedial Action and Remedial Design
Waste Containment Systems
Order Number PB93-105625CDH, price: PC A05/MF A02
Hazen and Sawyer, Raleigh, NC.; Environmental Protection
Agency, Washington, DC. Office of Emergency and Remedial
Response; Oct 92
The Technical Guidance Document is intended to augment
the numerous construction quality control and construction
quality assurance (CQC and CQA) documents that are avail-
able for materials associated with waste containment sys-
tems developed for Superfund site remediation. In general
DD^an ual 'S °riented to the remediation project manager
(RPM) who must administer these projects. This document
reviews the significant physical properties associated with
the construction materials used in waste containment de-
signs and reviews the sampling and acceptance strategies
required for Construction Quality Management. The first
chapter reviews the minimum Federal regulatory require-
ments for waste containment systems. Key elements of
these systems are identified. The second chapter reviews
the key physical properties and conformance tests required
to verify these properties. The third chapter reviews samplinq
methods.and acceptance criteria that are used to verify key
physical properties during construction.
Specifications: See also PB88-113295. Sponsored by Envi-
ronmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC Office of
•Emergency and Remedial Response. 100p.
Subject index keywords: Remedial action, Hazardous ma-
Sties? UnPserfund' Waste management, Containment, Reme-
1335 Technical Support Services for Superfund Site
Remediation. Second Edition
Order Number PB91-921285CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Nov 90
I£n-*Dire?t?!L(,!oCOnd Edition) uPdates and highlights the
significant OSWER and ORD technical assistance programs
that have procedures in place to process requests such as
answering a technical question, providing staff to work on a
problem, or referring callers to the appropriate source.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S Canada
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 73p.
Subject index keywords: Sites, Hazardous materials, Solid
waste disposal, Superfund.
1336 Technology Demonstration Summary, DuPbnt/
Oberlm Microfiltration System, Palmerton, Pennsylvania.
April-May 1992
Order Number PB92-224351CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Center for
hnvironmental Research Information; Mar 92
In April and May 1990, the U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA), under the Superfund Innovative Technology
Eyaluation (SITE) program, demonstrated DuPont/Oberlin's
microfiltration system at the Palmerton Zinc Superfund (PZS)
site in Palmerton, Pennsylvania. The microfiltration system
demonstrated at the PZS site was evaluated primarily in
terms of its ability to remove metals (mainly zinc) and partic-
ulates from the contaminated groundwater on site, while pro-
ducing a dry filter cake and filtrate that meet applicable dis-
posal requirements.
Specifications: See also PB92-153410. 9p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Water pollution con-
trol, Remedial action, Zinc, Hazardous materials, Microfiltra-
tion, DuPont/Oberlin Microfiltration Treatment.
1337 Technology Evaluation Report: Babcock and Wilcox
Cyclone Furnace Vitrification Technology. Volume 1
Order Number PB92-222215CDH, price: PC A06/MF A02
Science Applications International Corp., Cincinnati, OH.;
Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk
Reduction Engineering Lab; Sep 92
The project consists of an analysis of the Babcock,and
Wilcox (B&W) Cyclone Furnace Vitrification process. The
SITE Demonstration took place at the B&W Research and
Development Division in Alliance, Ohio. The vitrification proc-
ess was performed on a synthetic soil matrix (SSM) that was
spiked with known concentrations of semivolatile organic
compounds, metals, and simulated radionuclides. The Dem-
onstration effort was directed at obtaining information on the
performance and cost of the process for use at other sites.
Documentation will consist of two reports. This Technology
Evaluation Report (TER) is contained in two volumes and de-
scribes the field activities and laboratory results.
Specifications: See also Volume 2, PB92-222223. Spon-
sored by Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH
Risk Reduction Engineering Lab. 108p.
Subject index keywords: Soil treatment, Vitrification, Haz-
ardous materials, Waste management, Cyclone combustors,
Innovative treatment technologies, Superfund Innovative
Technology Evaluation.
1338 Technology Evaluation Report: Babcock and Wilcox
. Cyclone Furnace Vitrification Technology. Volume 2
Order Number PB92-222223CDH, price: PC A15/MF A03
. Science Applications International Corp., Cincinnati, OH.;
Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk
Reduction Engineering Lab; Sep 92
The Babcock & Wilcox (B&W) Cyclone Furnace Vitrification
Technology is a treatment process for contaminated soils.
The process was evaluated to determine its ability to destroy
semivolatile organics and to isolate metals and simulated ra-
dionuclides into a non-leachable slag material. The feed ma-
terial for the system was a prepared synthetic soil matrix
(SSM) that was spiked with two organic compounds and six
metals. This volume contains the appendices.
Specifications: See also Volume 1, PB92-222215. Spon-
sored by Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH.
Risk Reduction Engineering Lab. 328p.
Subject index keywords: Soil treatment, Vitrification, Haz-
ardous materials, Waste management, Cyclone combustors,
Innovative treatment technologies, Superfund Innovative
Technology Evaluation.
1339 Technology Evaluation Report CHEMFIX
Technologies, Inc., Solidification/Stabilization Process,
Clackamas, Oregon. Volume 2
Order Number PB90-274127CDH, price: PC A21/MF A03
Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk
Reduction Engineering Lab; Sep 90
The project is a field demonstration under the Superfund In-
novative Technology Evaluation program and designed to
255
-------
TECHNOLOGY POLICY & ADMINISTRATION:
Miscellaneous Policy & Program Documents
analyze the Chemfix Technologies, Inc. solidification/stabili-
zation technology. The technology uses a proprietary mixture
of silicate and cementious reagents to solidify and stabilize
the wastes. The technology demonstration took place at a
former recycling facility in Clackamas, Oregon. The wastes
consisted primarily of lead, copper, and polychlorinated bi-
phenyls. The demonstration effort was directed at obtaining
information on the performance and cost of the technology
for assessing its use at this as well as other uncontrolled
hazardous waste sites. Documentation consists of the report
that describes the field activities and laboratory results, pro-
vides §n interpretation of "the data, and discusses the poten-
tial applicability of trie technology.
Specifications: 485p.
Subject Index keywords: Waste treatment, Solidification,
Chemical stabilization, Land pollution control, CHEMFIX
process, Superfund.
1340 Technology Evaluation Report of Retech, Inc.,
Plasma Centrifugal Furnace. Volume 1
Order Number PB92-216035CDH, price: PC A09/MF A02
Science Applications International Corp., San Diego, CA.;
Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk
Reduction Engineering tab; Jul 92
A demonstration of the Retech, Inc. Plasma Centrifugal Fur-
nace (PCF) was conducted under the Superfund Innovative
Technology Evaluation (SITE) Program at the Department of
Energy's (DOE's) Component Development and Integration
Facility in Butte, Montana. The furnace uses heat generated
from a plasma arc to melt and vitrify solid feed material. The
feed soil was a mixture of Silver Bow Creek soil and 10% by
weight No. 2 diesel oil, spiked to provide 28,000 ppm zinc
oxide and 1000 ppm hexachlorobenzene in the soil/oil mix-
ture. Pre-treatment soil and scrubber liquor/makeup sampling
was performed to characterize the material inputs to the
process. Following treatment, the vitrified soil, scrubber
liquor, and stack gas were sampled to determine the technol-
ogy's suitability for use in destroying and immobilizing con-
taminants in the test soil. The results from the test were
used to draw conclusions on the technology. The conclu-
sions derived from the test results are presented.
Specifications: See also PB92-216043 and DE91015815.
Sponsored by Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati,
OH. Risk Reduction Engineering Lab. 190p.
Subject index keywords: Plasma furnaces, Incinerators,
Waste disposal, Hazardous materials.
1341 Technology Evaluation Report of Retech, Inc.,
Plasma Centrifugal Furnace. Volume 2
Order Number PB92-216043CDH, price: PC A15/MF A03
Science Applications International Corp., San Diego, CA.;
Envfronmenta! Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk
Reduction Engineering Lab; Jul 92
A demonstration of the Retech, Inc. Plasma Centrifugal Fur-
nace (PCF) was conducted under the Superfund Innovative
Technology Evaluation (SITE) Program at the Department of
Energy's (DOE's) Component Development and Integration
Facility in Butte, Montana. The following conclusions were
derived from the test results: (1) the treated soil did not
leach any metals at levels above the regulatory limits; (2) the
process achieved a Destruction and Removal Efficiency
(DRE) of greater than 99.99% for the Principal Organic Haz-
ardous Constituent (POHC); (3) the air pollution control
system did not reduce the level of particulate emissions to
below the RCRA limit; (4) a high percentage of the metals
fed to the furnace are encapsulated in the treated soil; (5)
the PCF is advantageous over other incinerator technologies
in that it can successfully immobilize heavy metals in the
slag; however, this treatment option can be more expensive
than conventional incineration. The report is the second
volume of the two-volume series. This volume contains the
appendixes for the demonstration of the plasma centrifugal
furnace.
Specifications: See also PB92-216035. Sponsored by Envi-
ronmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk Reduction
Engineering Lab. 331 p.
Subject index keywords: Plasma furnaces, Incinerators,
Waste disposals, Hazardous materials.
1342 Technology Evaluation Report of Retech's Plasma
Centrifugal Furnace. Volume 1
Order Number PB93-115160CDH, price: PC A09/MF A02
Science Applications International Corp., San Diego, CA.;
Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk
Reduction Engineering Lab; Apr 92
A demonstration of the Retech, Inc. Plasma Centrifugal Fur-
nace (PCF) was conducted under the Superfund Innovative
Technology Evaluation (SITE) Program at the Department of
Energy's (DOE's) Component Development and Integration
Facility in Butte, Montana. The furnace uses heat generated
from a plasma arc to melt and vitrify solid feed material. The
feed soil was a mixture of Silver Bow Creek soil and 10 per-
cent by weight No. 2 diesel oil, spiked to provide 28,000 ppm
zinc oxide and 1000 ppm hexachlorobenzene in the soil/oil
mixture. Pre-treatment soil and scrubber liquor/makeup sam-
pling was performed to characterize the material inputs to
the process. Following treatment, the vitrified soil, scrubber
liquor, and stack gas were sampled to determine the technol-
ogy's suitability for use in destroying and immobilizing con-
taminants in the test soil. The results from the test were
used to draw conclusions on the technology.
Specifications: See also Volume 2, PB93-115178. Spon-
sored by Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH.
Risk Reduction Engineering Lab. 190p.
Subject index keywords: Heat treatment, Waste treatment,
Soil treatment, Superfund, Innovative treatment technologies,
Plasma centrifugal furnaces.
1343 Technology Evaluation Report of Retech's Plasma
Centrifugal Furnace. Volume 2
Order Number PB93-115178CDH, price: PC A15/MF A03
Science Applications International Corp., San Diego, CA.;
Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk
Reduction Engineering Lab; Apr 92
The volume contains the appendices for volume 1. The
report contains TCLP data; particulates data; stack gas data;
feed soil data; treated soil data; pretest scrubber liquor data;
posttest scrubber liquor data; scrubber make-up data; contin-
uous emission monitors data; physical results data; gas sam-
pling logs; audit reports; and equipment operations data.
Specifications: See also Volume 1, PB93-115160. Spon-
sored by Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH.
Risk Reduction Engineering Lab. 348p.
Subject index keywords: Heat treatment, Waste treatment,
Soil treatment, Superfund, Innovative treatment technologies,
Plasma centrifugal furnaces.
256
-------
TECHNOLOGY POLICY & ADMINISTRATION:
Miscellaneous Policy & Program Documents
1344 Technology Evaluation Report: Ogden Circulating
Bed Combustor at the McColl Superfund Site
Order Number PB92-227289CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk
Reduction Engineering Lab; Jan 92
The Superfund Innovative Technology Evaluation (SITE) Pro-
gram was authorized in the 1986 Superfund amendments.
The report provides documentation of a pilot-scale treatability
study and demonstration of an innovative technology that
took place in San Diego, California at the Ogden Environ-
mental Services (OES) Research facility. Observation and
sampling of a research-scale circulating bed combustor
(CBC) took place during a preliminary test sponsored under
an agreement between the SITE Program and OES. The
treatability study was conducted on a minimal amount of rep-
resentative McColl Site waste to determine if a full SITE
Demonstration is feasible.
Specifications: 69p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste treat-
ment, Superfund, Circulating bed combustor.
1345 Technology Evaluation Report: Perox-Pure (Trade
Name) Chemical Oxidation Technology
Order Number PB93-213528CDH, price: PC A06/MF A02
PRC Environmental Management, Inc., Chicago, IL;
Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk
Reduction Engineering Lab; Aug 93
The report evaluates the perox-pure chemical oxidation tech-
nology's ability to remove volatile organic compounds (VOC)
and other organic contaminants present in liquid wastes. The
report also presents economic data from the Superfund Inno-
vative Technology Evaluation (SITE) demonstration and three
cases studies. The perox-pure chemical oxidation technology
was developed by Peroxidation Systems Inc. (PSI), to de-
stroy dissolved organic contaminants in water. The technolo-
gy uses ultraviolet (UV) radiation and hydrogen peroxide to
oxidize organic compounds present in water at parts per mil-
lion levels or less. This treatment technology produces no air
emissions and generates no sludge or spent media that re-
quire further processing, handling, or disposal. The perox-
pure chemical oxidation technology was demonstrated under
the SITE Program at Lawrence Livermore National Laborato-
ry Site 300 in Tracy, CA. Over a 3-week period in September
1992, about 40,000 gallons of VOC contaminated ground
water was treated in the perox-pure system. For the SITE
demonstration, the perox-pure system achieved trichloroeth-
ene (TCE) and tetrachloroethene (PCE) removal efficiencies
of about 99.7 & 97.1 percent, respectively.
Specifications: Sponsored by Environmental Protection
Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk Reduction Engineering Lab
113p.
Subject index keywords: Waste treatment, Water pollution
control, Volatile organic compounds, Oxidation, Perox-pure
chemical oxidation technology.
1346 Technology Evaluation Report: SITE Program. CF
Systems Organics Extraction System, New Bedford,
Massachusetts. Volume 1
Order Number PB90-186495CDH, price: PC A06/MF A01
Science Applications International Corp., McLean, VA.;
Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk
Reduction Engineering Lab; Jan 90
The report summarizes the results of a Superfund Innovative
Technology Evaluation (SITE) demonstration of the CF Sys-
tems critical fluid organics extraction system at the New Bed-
ford Harbor, Massachusetts Superfund site. The technology
depends on the ability of organic pollutants to solubilize in
the process solvent, a liquefied gas. The pollutants treated
include polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) and polynuclear ar-
omatic hydrocarbons. The report examines the performance
of the process in terms of PCB extraction efficiency, variation
in process operating conditions, potential health and safety
impacts, equipment and handling problems, and projected
system economics. Volume I covers process design, field ac-
tivities, sampling and analytical program, and results and dis-
cussion.
Specifications: See also Volume 2, PB90-186503. Spon-
sored by Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH.
Risk Reduction Engineering Lab. 106p.
Subject index keywords: Solvent extraction, Waste dispos-
al, Sediments, Water pollution control, Hazardous materials,
Aromatic polycyclic hydrocarbons, Superfund Innovative
Technology Evaluation, Technology utilization, Marine dis-
posal, Cleanup operations, Polychlorinated biphenyls.
1347 Technology Evaluation Report: SITE Program. CF
Systems Organics Extraction System, New Bedford,
Massachusetts. Volume 2
Order Number PB90-186503CDH, price: PC A08/MF A01
Science Applications International Corp., McLean, VA.;
Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk
Reduction Engineering Lab; Jan 90
The report summarizes the results of a Superfund Innovative
Technology Evaluation (SITE) demonstration of the CF Sys-
tems critical fluid organics extraction system at the New Bed-
ford Harbor, Massachusetts Superfund site. The technology
depends on the ability of organic pollutants to solubilize in
the process solvent, a liquefied gas. The pollutants treated
include polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) and polynuclear ar-
omatic hydrocarbons. The report examines the performance
of the process in terms of PCB extraction efficiency, variation
in process operating conditions, potential health and safety
impacts, equipment and handling problems, and projected
system economics. Volume II contains sampling and analyti-
cal reports and operating log data.
Specifications: See also Volume 1, PB90-186495. Spon-
sored by Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH.
Risk Reduction Engineering Lab. 173p.
Subject index keywords: Solvent extraction, Waste dispos-
al, Sediments, Water pollution control, Hazardous materials,
Aromatic polycyclic hydrocarbons, Chemical analysis, Pollu-
tion monitoring, Superfund Innovative Technology Evaluation,
Technology Utilization, Marine disposal, Polychlorinated bi-
phenyls.
1348 Technology Evaluation Report: SITE Program
Demonstration. EPA RREL's Mobile Volume Reduction
Unit
Order Number PB94-136264CDH, price: PC A07/MF A02
Science Applications International Corp., Cincinnati, OH.;
Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk
Reduction Engineering Lab; Dec 93
The document provides a detailed description of the U.S. En-
vironmental Protection Agency (EPA) Risk Reduction Labora-
tory's (RREL's) Volume Reduction Unit (VRU) process and
system. Detailed results from a demonstration of the VRU
was conducted in the fall of 1992 using RREL's pilot-scale
257
-------
TECHNOLOGY POLICY & ADMINISTRATION:
Miscellaneous Policy & Program Documents
unit at the Escambia Treating Company Superfund Site in
Pensacola, Florida, the technological effectiveness and the
economics of the process are assessed on the basis of ex-
tensive analytical and quality assurance programs. Quality
assurance of the sampling and analysis effort is an integral
part of this document. Operational data and sampling and
analysis information were carefully compiled to establish a
database against which other available data, as well as the
developer's claims, could be compared and evaluated.
Specifications: Sponsored by Environmental Protection
Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk Reduction Engineering Lab.
130p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Hazardous materials,
Soil pollution, Wood preservatives, PCP(Pentachlorophenol).
1349 technology Evaluation Report: Site" Program
Demonstration of a Trial Excavation at the McColl
Superfund Site
Order Number PB92-226448CDH, price: PC A10/MF A03
IT Corp., Cincinnati, OH.; Environmental Protection Agency,
Cincinnati, OH. Risk Reduction Engineering Lab; Sep 92
A trial excavation of approximately 137 cubic yards of waste
was performed at the McColl Superfund Site in Fullerton, CA,
to better determine the nature of the waste, any treatment
needed to improve its handling characteristics, and the
exteril of air emissions that might occur during excavation.
The type of information is necessary to plan full-scale reme-
diatiqrl of the highly acidic petroleum refinery waste buried at
the site. The trial excavation was conducted within a tempo-
rary enclosure with air exhausted from the enclosure through
a sodium hydroxide-based wet scrubber and activated-
carbon bed adsorber to reduce air emissions of sulfur dioxide
and organic compounds. Foam was used in an attempt to
suppress atmospheric releases from the raw waste during
excavation, storage, and processing. The air exhaust was
monitored for total hydrocarbons and sulfur dioxide before
and after the air emission control system. In addition, total
hydrocarbons and sulfur dioxide were monitored along the
site perimeter to determine potential impact of air emissions
on the nearby community.
Specifications: See also PB92-105857. Sponsored by Envi-
ronmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk Reduction
Engineering Lab. 212p.
Subject index keywords: Soils, Incinerators, Waste treat-
ment. Hazardous materials, Superfund, Fulierton(California).
1350 Technology Evaluation Report: SITE Program
Demonstration of the DuPont/Oberlin Microfiltration
Technology
Order Number PB92-153410CDH, price: PC A06/MF A02
PRC Environmental Management, Inc., Chicago, IL;
Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk
Reduction Engineering Lab; Mar 92
In April and May 1990, the U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA), under the Superfund Innovative Technology
Evaluation (SITE) program, demonstrated Dupont/Oberlin's
microfiltration system at the Pamerton Zinc Superfund (PZS)
site in Palmerton, Pennsylvania. The microfiltration system
combines Dupont's Tyvek T-980 filter media with Oberlin's
automatic pressure filter and is designed to remove solids
larger than 0.1 micron in diameter from liquid wastes. The
microfiltration system demonstrated at the PZS site was
evaluated primarily in terms of its ability to remove metals
(mainly zinc) and particulates from the contaminated ground-
water on site, while producing a dry filter cake and filtrate
that meet applicable disposal requirements.
Specifications: See also PB92-119023. Sponsored by Envi-
ronmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk Reduction
Engineering Lab. 109p.
Subject index keywords: Water pollution control, Land pol-
lution control, Hazardous materials, Superfund, Remedial
action, Liquid wastes, Microfiltration, DuPont/Oberlin Microfil-
tration Treatment.
1351 Technology Evaluation Report: SITE Program
Demonstration of the Ultrox International Ultraviolet
Radiation/Oxidation Technology
Order Number PB90-198177CDH, price: PC A07/MF A01
PRC Environmental Management, Inc., Chicago, IL.;
Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk
Reduction Engineering Lab; Jan 90
The document presents the field evaluation results of the ul-
traviolet radiation (UV)/oxidation technology developed by
Ultrox International, Santa Ana, California. The field evalua-
tion of the technology was performed at the Lorentz Barrel
and Drum (LB&D) site in San Jose, California, under the Su-
perfund Innovative Technology Evaluation (SITE) program
from February 27 through March 10, 1989. The UV/oxidation
technology uses UV radiation, ozone, and hydrogen peroxide
to oxidize organic contaminants present in water. At the
LB&D site, this technology was evaluated in treating ground
water contaminated with volatile organic compounds (VOCs).
The Ultrox system achieved VOC removals greater than
90%. The majority of VOC's were removed through chemical
oxidation. However, for a few VOC's, such as 1,1,1-trichlor-
oethane (1,1,1-TCA) and 1,1-dichloroethane (1,1-DCA) strip-
ping also contributed toward removal. The treated ground
water met the applicable discharge standards (NPDES) for
disposal into a local waterway at 95% confidence level.
There were no harmful air emissions from the Ultrox system
into the atmosphere.
Specifications: Sponsored by Environmental Protection
Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk Reduction Engineering Lab.
141p.
Subject index keywords: Waste, Hazardous materials,
Water pollution control, Ground water, Ultraviolet radiation,
Oxidation, Superfund Innovative Technology Evaluation Pro-
gram, Ultrox treatment, Volatile organic compounds.
1352 Technology Evaluation Report: Site Program
Demonstration Test. Accutech Pneumatic Fracturing
Extraction and Hot Gas Injection, Phase 1. Volume 1
Order Number PB93-216596CDH, price: PC A08/MF A02
Science Applications International Corp., Hackensack, NJ.;
Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk
Reduction Engineering Lab; Jul 93
The Pneumatic Fracturing Extraction (PFE) process devel-
oped by Accutech Remedial Systems, Inc. makes it possible
to use vapor extraction to remove volatile organics at in-
creased rates from a broader range of vadose zones. The
low permeability of silts, clays, shales, etc. would otherwise
make such formations unsuitable for cost-effective vapor ex-
traction and require more costly approaches. Pneumatic frac-
turing provides an innovative means of increasing the perme-
ability of a formation and thus extending the radius of influ-
ence so that contaminants can be effectively extracted. In
the PFE process, fracture wells are drilled in the contaminat-
258
-------
TECHNOLOGY POLICY & ADMINISTRATION:
Miscellaneous Policy & Program Documents
ed vadose zone and left open bore (uncased) for most of
their depth. A packer system is used to isolate small (2 ft)
intervals so that short bursts (- 20 sec) of compressed air
(less than 500 psig) can be injected into the interval to frac-
ture the formation. The process is repeated for each interval.
The fracturing extends and enlarges existing fissures and/or
introduces new fractures, primarily in the horizontal direction.
When fracturing has been completed, the formations then
subjected to vapor extraction.
Specifications: Sponsored by Environmental Protection
Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk Reduction Engineering Lab.
165p.
Subject index keywords: Land pollution control, Remedial
action, Soil treatment, Volatile organic compounds, Soil
vapor extraction, Pneumatic fracturing extraction.
1353 Technology Evaluation Report: SITE Program
Demonstration Test Horsehead Resource Development
Company, Inc., Flame Reactor Technology, Monaca,
Pennsylvania
Order Number PB92-205855CDH, price: PC A07/MF A02
PRC Environmental Management, Inc., Houston, TX.;
Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk
Reduction Engineering Lab; Jul 92
A SITE demonstration of the Horsehead Resource Develop-
ment (HRD) Company, Inc. Flame Reactor Technology was
conducted in March 1991 at the HRD facility in Monaca,
Pennsylvania. For the demonstration, secondary lead smelter
soda slag was treated to produce a potentially recyclable
lead- and zinc-enriched oxide product and a nonhazardous
(based on the regulatory requirements of the Toxicity Char-
acteristic test) effluent slag. The lead and zinc in the oxide
product were concentrated about threefold from the feed
concentrations. The effluent slag was determined to be non-
hazardous based on extraction by the Toxicity Characteristic
Leaching Procedure. Potential wastes that might be treated
include industrial residues, Resource Conservation and Re-
covery Act wastes, Superfund wastes, and other wastes con-
taminated with metals and organic wastes.
Specifications: Sponsored by Environmental Protection
Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk Reduction Engineering Lab
128p.
Subject index keywords: Hight temperature tests, Industrial
waste treatment, SITE program, Superfund.
1354 Technology Transfer Needs Assessment, 1990
Order Number PB91 -125674CDH, price: PC A06/MF A01
IGF, Inc., Fairfax, VA.; Environmental Management Support,
Silver Spring, MD.*Environmental Protection Agency
Washington, DC. Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
Response; Apr 90
The report summarizes the results of the Office of Solid
Waste and Emergency Response (OSWER) Technology
Transfer Needs Assessment of FY 1990. The effort extends
and updates a 1986 needs assessment conducted for the
Superfund program and previous ORD studies on Regional
research and technology transfer needs. It encompasses the
Superfund (CERCLA), Hazardous Waste (RCRA), and Under-
ground Storage Tank (UST) programs, including OSWER en-
forcement. Regional Environmental Service Divisions (ESDs)
and Superfund Technical Support Project Forum members
were also included in the survey. The study attempts to ex-
plore actual and future needs, to the extent possible and fur-
ther provides guidance for selecting technology transfer de-
livery methods, including electronic and other advanced
media for information distribution, based on specific needs
and audience characteristics. The results indicate the priority
of technical needs across program areas and Regions, and
provide previously unavailable data regarding OSWER audi-
ences.
Specifications: Prepared in cooperation with Environmental
Management Support, Silver Spring, MD. Sponsored by Envi-
ronmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response. 112p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Technology
transfer, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response,
Waste management.
1355 Terra Vac In situ Vacuum Extraction System:
Applications Analysis Report
Order Number PB90-119744CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
Foster Wheeler Enviresponse, Inc., Livingston, NJ.;
Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk
Reduction Engineering Lab; Jul 89
The report analyzes the results from the SITE Program's 56-
day demonstration at the Valley Manufactured Product Com-
pany's site in Groveland, Massachusetts. Conclusions were
reached concerning the technology's suitability for use in re-
mediations involving both similar and different materials at
other sites. Operational data and sampling and analysis infor-
mation were monitored carefully to establish a database
against which vendor's claims for the technology could be
evaluated. Additional data on the technology's performance
at other sites is also discussed. The conclusions from the re-
sults of the Groveland demonstration test and from other
available data are: the process can be used to remediate a
site contaminated with VOCs; the process can remove VOCs
from soils with permeabilities as low as 10 to the 8th power
cm/s; the process operates well in all weather conditions;
and the process implementation costs can be as low as
$20/ton, depending on various site-specific conditions.
Specifications: Sponsored by Environmental Protection
Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk Reduction Engineering Lab.
65p.
Subject index keywords: Site surveys, Hazardous materi-
als, Vacuum apparatus, Extraction, Water pollution control,
Volatile organic compounds, Superfund program, Remedial
action, Waste management.
1356 Terra Vac In situ Vacuum Extraction System:
Applications Analysis Report
Order Number PB90-126665CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
Foster Wheeler Enviresponse, Inc., Edison, NJ.;
Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk
Reduction Engineering Lab; Jul 89
The document is an evaluation of the Terra Vac in situ
vacuum extraction system and its applicability as a treatment
method for waste site cleanup. The report analyzes the re-
sults from the Superfund Innovative Technology Evaluation
(SITE) Program's 56-day demonstration at the Valley Manu-
factured Product Company's site in Groveland, Massachu-
setts and data from other applications. Conclusions were
reached concerning the technology's suitability for use in re-
mediations involving both similar and different materials at
other sites. Operational data and sampling and analysis infor-
mation were monitored carefully to establish a database
against which vendor's claims for the technology could be
259
-------
TECHNOLOGY POLICY & ADMINISTRATION:
Miscellaneous Policy & Program Documents
evaluated. The conclusions from the results of the Groveland
demonstration test and from other available data are: (1) the
process can be used to remediate a site contaminated with
VOCs; (2) the process can remove VOCs from soils with per-
meabilities as low as 10 to the minus eighth power cm/s; (3)
the process operates well in all weather conditions; and (4)
the process implementation costs can be as low as $10/ton,
depending on various site-specific conditions.
Specifications: Color illustrations reproduced in black and
white. Sponsored by Environmental Protection Agency, Cin-
cinnati, OH. Risk Reduction Engineering Lab. 65p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste dis-
posal, Site surveys, Clean-up operations, Superfund program,
Groveland(Massachusetts), Terra Vac in situ vacuum extrac-
tion systems.
1357 Thermal Desorption Treatment
Order Number PB91-228080CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Science Applications International Corp., Cincinnati, OH.;
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; May 91
Thermal desorption is an ex situ means to physically sepa-
rate volatile and some semivolatile contaminants from soil,
sediments, sludges, and filter cakes. For wastes containing
up to10% organics or less, thermal desorption can be used
alone for site remediation. It also may find applications in
conjunction with other technologies or be appropriate to spe-
cific operable units at a site. Site-specific treatability studies
may be necessary to document the applicability and perform-
ance of a thermal desorption system. Thermal desorption is
applicable to organic wastes and generally is not used for
treating metals and other inorganics. Depending on the spe-
cific thermal desorption vendor selected, the technology
heats contaminated media between 200-1000 F, driving off
water and volatile contaminants. Offgases may be burned in
an afterburner, condensed to reduce the volume to be dis-
posed, or captured by carbon adsorption beds. The bulletin
provides information on the technology applicability, limita-
tlonSj the types of residuals produced, the latest perform-
ance data, site requirements, the status of the technology,
and sources for further information.
Specifications: Sponsored by Environmental Protection
Agency, Washington, DC. Office of Emergency and Remedial
Response. 10p.
Subject Index keywords: Waste treatment, Hazardous ma-
terials. Thermal environments, Desorption.
1358 foxlcologlcai Assessment of Hazardous Wastes
Order Number AD-P006 468/3CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Seattle, WA. Office of
Research and Development; Mar 92
Section 121 of the Comprehensive Environmental Response,
Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980 (SUPERFUND) calls
for hazardous waste site remediations which permanently
and significantly reduce the volume, toxicity, or mobility of
hazardous substances, pollutants, and contaminants. Tradi-
tional engineering technology has concentrated on reduction
in volume and mobility as assessed by chemical and geo-
physical measures. It was assumed that accomplishment of
volume and mobility reduction would lead to reductions in
toxicity. Environmental scientists long have argued that this
assumption might not be the case. However, lack of consen-
sus on how complex hazardous waste mixtures should be
measured lexicologically hampered integrated assessments.
Therefore, a battery of aquatic and terrestrial bioassays was
assembled and evaluated comparatively against several
chemicals and waste site chemical mixtures. The bioassays
were then applied to a mobility reduction demonstration to
assess its overall chemical, physical, and biological perform-
ance. Results indicated that, while the primary objective of
mobility reduction seemed to be achieved, undesirable sec-
ondary effects (toxicity) were introduced. These trade-offs
must be considered in the holistic sense when remediation
measures are being implemented.
Specifications: This article is from 'Managment of Bottom
Sediments Containing Toxic Substances: Proceedings of the
US/Japan Experts Meeting (14th) Held in Yokohama, Japan
on 27 February-1 March 1990,' AD-A250 148, p260-271.
12p.
Subject index keywords: Toxicity, Waste management, Su-
perfund.
1359 Toxicological Implementations of Remediating
Hazardous Wastes
Order Number PB92-124171CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Corvallis Environmental Research Lab., OR; 1991
Section 121 of the amendments (1986) to the Comprehen-
sive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability
Act of 1980 (SUPERFUND) calls for hazardous waste site re-
mediations that will permanently and significantly reduce the
volume, toxicity, or mobility of hazardous substances, pollut-
ants, and contaminants. Traditional engineering technology
has concentrated on reduction in volume and mobility as as-
sessed by chemical and geophysical measures, assuming
that reduction in volume and mobility would lead to reduc-
tions in toxicity. Environmental scientists long have argued
that this might not be the case. However, lack of consensus
on how complex hazardous waste mixtures should be meas-
ured toxicologically has hampered integrated assessments.
Therefore, new work was initiated to assemble a battery of
aquatic and terrestrial bioassays to be evaluated compara-
tively against several individual chemicals, mixtures of chemi-
cals, and actual waste site chemical mixtures. The bioassays
were then applied to a mobility reduction demonstration to
help assess its overall chemical, physical, and biological per-
formance. Results indicated that although remediation ac-
complished the primary objective of mobility reduction, it in-
troduced undesirable secondary effects (toxicity). These
trade-offs must be considered in the holistic sense with
regard to the implementation and evaluation of remediation
measures.
Specifications: Pub. in Proceedings, International Confer-
ence of the Protection of the Environment, Lublin, Poland,
September 16-19, 1991 and International Conference on
Bioindication of Reg. Deterioration (6th), Ceske Budejovic,
Czechoslovakia, September 15-21, 1991. See also PB88-
125430. 20p.
Subject index keywords: Toxicology, Remedial action, Haz-
ardous materials, Bioassay, Toxic substances.
1360 Toxicological Profile for Benzo(b)Fluoranthene
Order Number PB90-247651CDH, price: PC A05/MF A01
ICF-Clement, Washington, DC.; Agency for Toxic Substances
and Disease Registry, Atlanta, GA.*Environmental Protection
Agency, Washington, DC; Mar 90
The Toxicological Profile for Benzo(b)fluoranthene is intend-
ed to characterize the toxicological and health effects infor-
260
, Imli , [\lSt\i\ Ill'ilnil, :i
in! .Ml MI,! ! M,i|i!!i;i,,'!'i' Li ill
-------
TECHNOLOGY POLICY & ADMINISTRATION:
Miscellaneous Policy & Program Documents
mation for the substance. It identifies and reviews the key lit-
erature that describes the substance's toxicological proper-
ties. Other literature is presented but described in less detail.
The profile begins with a public health statement, which de-
scribes in nontechnical language the substance's relevant
toxicoiogical properties. Following the statement is material
that presents levels of significant human exposure and,
where known, significant health effects.
Specifications: Sponsored by Agency for Toxic Substances
and Disease Registry, Atlanta, GA., and Environmental Pro-
tection Agency, Washington, DC. 76p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Toxicity,
Public health, Superfund, Benzofluoranthene.
1361 Toxicological Profile for Trichloroethylene
Order Number PB90-127523CDH, price: PC A07/MF A01
Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry, Atlanta,
GA.; Syracuse Research Corp., NY.**Oak Ridge National
Lab., TN.*Environmental Protection Agency, Washington,
DC; Oct 89
The ATSDR Toxicological Profile for Trichloroethylene is in-
tended to characterize succinctly the toxicological and health
effects information for the substance. It identifies and re-
views the key literature that describes the substances's toxi-
cological properties. Other literature is presented but de-
scribed in less detail. The profile is not intended to be an ex-
haustive document; however, more comprehensive sources
of specialty information are referenced. The profile begins
with a public health statement, which describes in nontechni-
cal language the substance's relevant toxicological proper-
ties. Following the statement is material that presents levels
of significant human exposure and, where known, significant
health effects. The adequacy of information to determine the
substance's health effects is described. Research gaps in
nontoxic and health effects information are described. Re-
search gaps that are of significance to the protection of
public health will be identified in a separate effort. The focus
of the document is on health and toxicological information.
Specifications: Prepared in cooperation with Syracuse Re-
search Corp., NY., and Oak Ridge National Lab., TN. Spon-
sored by Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC.
146p.
Subject index keywords: Toxicology, Trichloroethylene.
1362 Tracking Toxic Substances at Industrial Facilities:
Engineering Mass Balance versus Materials Accounting
Order Number PB92-223213CDH, price: PC A09/MF A02
National Research Council, Washington, DC.; Environmental
Protection Agency, Washington, DC; 1990
In response to a congressional mandate, this book examines
whether knowing the amounts of toxic substances entering
and leaving manufacturing facilities is useful in evaluating
chemical releases to the environment, waste reduction
progress, and chemical management practices. Tracking
these substances with rigorous engineering data is compared
with a less resource-intensive alternative to determine the
feasibility and potential usefulness to the public and the gov-
ernment.
Specifications: Library of Congress catalog card no. 89-
62948. Sponsored by Environmental Protection Agency,
Washington, DC. 191 p.
Subject index keywords: Toxic substances, Environmental
surveys, Industrial wastes, Mass balance, Waste manage-
ment.
1363 U.S. EPA SITE Demonstration of AWD Technologies'
AquaDetox/SVE System
Order Number PB92-124387CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk
Reduction Engineering Lab; c1991
The report covers the results of the Superfund Innovative
Technology Evaluation Program's demonstration of the AWD
Technologies AquaDetox/SVE. The system combines a
vacuum assisted steam stripping unit and a soil vapor gas
extraction system into an integrated unit. The demonstration
was conducted during September 1990 at the Lockheed
Aeronautical System Corp. in Burbank, CA. The results of a
2-week demonstration confirmed the ability of the system to
meet regulatory discharge requirements for the contaminants
of concern, TCE and PCE.
Specifications: Pub. in Jnl. of Air Waste Management Asso-
ciation, v41 n11 p1519-1523 Nov 91. 7p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Land pollution control,
Water pollution control, Remedial action, Waste manage-
ment, Volatile organic compounds, AquaDetox/SVE treat-
ment system.
1364 Ultrox International Ultraviolet Radiation/Oxidation
Technology: Applications Analysis Report
Order Number PB91-129759CDH, price: PC A05/MF A01
PRC Environmental Management, Inc., Chicago, IL;
Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk
Reduction Engineering Lab; Sep 90
In support of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's
(EPA) Superfund Innovative Technology Evaluation (SITE)
Program, the report evaluates both treatment efficiency and
economic cost from the SITE demonstration and seven case
studies. The Ultrox technology simultaneously uses ultravio-
let (UV) radiation, ozone, and hydrogen peroxide to oxidize
dissolved organic contaminants found in groundwater or
wastewater. Under the SITE Program, the Ultrox technology
demonstration was conducted at the Lorentz Barrel and
Drum (LB&D) site, San Jose, California, in February and
March of 1989. During the demonstration, the Ultrox system
achieved volatile organic compound (VOC) removals greater
than 90 percent The majority of VOCs were removed
through chemical oxidation. However, stripping also contrib-
uted toward removal of a few VOCs, such as 1,1,1-trichlor-
oethane (1,1,1-TCA) and 1,1-dichloroethane (1,1-DCA). The
treated groundwater met the applicable National Pollutant
Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) standards for dis-
charge into a local waterway. In addition, there were no
harmful air emissions to the atmosphere from the Ultrox
system, which is equipped with an off-gas treatment unit.
Specifications: Sponsored by Environmental Protection
Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk Reduction Engineering Lab.
79p.
Subject index keywords: Water treatment, Waste water,
Ground water, Ultrox technology, Technology assessment,
Remedial action, Superfund.
261
-------
if Ff ' ' : limn 1!.
TECHNOLOGY PQUCY& ADMINISTRATION:
Miscellaneous Policy & Program Documents
1365 Use of a Fourier Transform Spectrometer as a
Remote Sensor at Superfund Sites
Order Number PB91-199844CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Northrop Services, Inc., Research Triangle Park, NC.; MDA
Scientific, Inc., Norcrpss, GA.**ManTech Environmental
Technology, Inc., Research Triangle Park,
NO.* Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle
Park, NC. Atmospheric Research and Exposure Assessment
Lab; 1991
A Fourier transform infrared remote sensor (FTIR-RS) was
used to measure chemical emissions at the Shaver's Farm
Superfund site in northwestern Georgia. The system was bis-
tatic with a source/receiver at one end of a 250 m path and
a retroreflector at the other end. The source/receiver was a
Nicole] Model 730 FJIR system coupled to a telescope with
the appropriate transfer optics. The average concentrations
of target gases along the path are inferred by matching field
spectra with reference spectra of precisely measured quanti-
ties qf the target gases. Measurements indicated that ben-
zonilrle and benzaldehyde concentrations at the site were
lower than the FTIR-RS detection limits of 70 and 16 ppm-m,
respectively. Background IR radiation was successfully elimi-
nated by modulating the IR beam before it was transmitted
along the path. Quality assurance measurements to establish
the precision and accuracy of known gas burdens (ppm-m)
were carried out using a 15-cm cell containing high concen-
trations of several gases.
Specifications: Prepared in cooperation with MDA Scientif-
ic, Ina, Norcrpss, GA., and ManTech Environmental Technol-
ogy, Inc., Research Triangle Park, NC. Sponsored by Envi-
ronmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, NC.
Atmospheric Research and Exposure Assessment Lab. 15p.
Subject index keywords: Air pollution detection, Remote
sensing, Superfund, Waste disposal, Fourier transform spec-
trometers.
1366 Use of Electrokinetics for Hazardous Waste Site
Remediation
Order Number PB91-171694CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk
Reduction Engineering Lab.; PEER Consultants, Inc., Dayton,
OH; 01990
The S'uperfund Innovative Technology Evaluation (SITE) pro-
gram was authorized as part of the 1986 amendments to the
Superfund legislation. It represents a joint effort between the
U.S. EPA's Office of Research and Development and Office
of Solid Waste and Emergency Response. The program is
designed to assist and encourage the development of waste
treatment technologies that would contribute to more solu-
tions to our hazardous waste problems. Recently, EPA,
through the SITE program, issued a work assignment to
assess the 'state-of-the-art' of electrokinetically enhanced
contaminant removal from soils. Prior research efforts, both
laborator and field, have demonstrated the electo-osmosis
has the potential to be effective in facilitating the removal of
certain types of hazardous wastes from soils. Particularly en-
couraging results have been achieved with inorganics in fine
grained soils where more traditional removal alternatives are
less effective. Although the results of various studies suggest
that electrokinetics is a promising technology, further testing
is needed at both the laboratory and field levels to fully de-
velop this technology for site remediation. A conceptual test
program is presented based on best available data which in-
corporates system design and operating parameters used in
previous applications of this technology in the use of electro-
kinetics treatment as a remediation technique at hazardous
waste sites. (Copyright (c) 1990-Air & Waste Management
Association.
Specifications: Pub. in Jnl. of Air Waste Management Asso-
ciation, v40 n12 p1670-1676 Dec 90. Prepared in coopera-
tion with PEER Consultants, Inc., Dayton, OH. 9p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Hazardous materials,
Remedial action, Soil contamination, Electrodynamics.
1367 Use of 'Selenastrum capricornutum' to Assess the
Toxicity Potential of Surface and Ground Water
Contamination Caused by Chromium Waste
Order Number PB90-108242CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Corvallis Environmental Research Lab., OR.; Northrop
Services, Inc., Corvallis, OR; c1988
United Chrome Products, Inc. (Corvallis, OR), discharged
liquid chrome-plating wastes into an on-site dry well from
1957 to 1977. Samples were collected from ground and sur-
face waters during February and December 1984 and evalu-
ated for toxicity potential using 96-h Selenastrum capricornu-
tum bioassays. Bioassays of the February samples were
used to calculated predicted EC50 values for different chro-
mium concentrations, which were then compared with the
chromium concentrations measured in the December sam-
ples and with the results of S. capricornutum bioassays on
these samples. An excellent correlation was obtained be-
tween the predicted EC50 values and the actual bioassay re-
sponse values for ground water and drainage ditch samples.
However, no correlation was obtained with the off-site sur-
face water samples. These results could not be explained by
changes in chromium valence, and they demonstrate that,
even in simple systems, toxicity cannot readily be predicted
based solely on chemical analysis.
Specifications: Pub. in Environmental Toxicology and
Chemistry, v7 p35-39 1988. Prepared in cooperation with
Northrop Services, Inc., Corvallis, OR. 7p.
Subject index keywords: Chromium plating, Water pollution,
Toxicity, Industrial wastes, Selenastrum capricornutum.
1368 Using the DNA Alkaline Unwinding Assay to Detect
DMA Damage in Laboratory and Environmentally
Exposed Cells and Tissues
Order Number PB90-245770CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Science Applications International Corp., Narragansett, Rl.;
Environmental Research Lab., Narragansett, Rl; c1990
The DNA alkaline unwinding assay is being evaluated for use
in the detection of DNA damage in marine animals exposed
to environmental pollutants. In preliminary work, DNA un-
winding methods were used with in vitro cell systems to
demonstrate DNA strand breaks. Cultured mammalian fibrob-
lasts and sperm from marine fish and invertebrates (Pseudo-
pleuronectes, Arbacia and Mytilus) showed concentration-de-
pendent increases in DNA strand breaks after brief expo-
sures to alkylating agents. DNA unwinding methods were
also used on DNA extracted from marine animals injected
with genotoxicants and from animals exposed in situ at an
estuarine site. Gills from blue mussels caged at the New
Bedford Harbor Superfund Site (MA, USA) highly contaminat-
ed with many organic (e.g. PCBs) and inorganic contami-
nants, were also examined. A significant increase in DNA
strand breaks was seen in gill tissues of animals held in the
contaminated site for as little as 3 days. Although not as
262
-------
TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION; Air
Technologies
severe, an increase in strand breaks was also seen in ani-
mals held at the control site for 28 days. (Copyright (c) 1990,
Elsevier Science Publishers Ltd., England.)
Specifications: Pub. in Marine Environmental Research 28,
P333-337 1989. Sponsored by Environmental Research Lab.,
Narragansett, Rl. 6p.
Subject index keywords: Marine biology, DNA unwinding
proteins, Water pollution effects(Animals), DNA damage, Mu-
tagenicity tests.
1369 Vendor Information Form to be Completed for
Participation in the: Vendor Information System for
Innovative Treatment Technologies (VISITT)
Order Number PB91-921289CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Jun 91
The Vendor Information System for Innovative Treatment
Technologies (VISITT) is an automated database developed
for use by those responsible for site remediation, including
state, federal, and private sector professionals responsible
for site cleanup of the nation's hazardous waste sites. The
Technology Innovation Office (TIO) and the Office of Solid
Waste and Emergency Response (OSWER) is conducting
the Invitation for Submittals for developers and providers of
innovative treatment technologies. The information submitted
will be entered into the database. EPA expects that VISITT
will be used as a tool to screen technologies for remediation
of these sites.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 48p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste treat-
ment, Superfund.
1370 Vendor Information System for Innovative
Treatment Technologies (VISITT). Number 1
Order Number PB92-224716CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Jun 92
The bulletin highlights facts about the Vendor Information
System for Innovative Treatment Technologies (VISITT). This
database contains information on vendors of innovative tech-
nologies to treat ground water in situ, soils, sludges and sedi-
ments. It includes technologies at all stages of develop-
ment-bench, pilot, or full. VISITT provides environmental
professionals with rapid access to up-to-date information on
155 innovative technologies and the 97 companies that offer
them. Once the database identifies the technologies and
vendors meeting the user's requirements, the user can then
review such information as available equipment, performance
data, and experience.
Specifications: See also PB91-921289. 8p.
Subject index keywords: Ground water, Soils, Pollution
control, Remedial action, Information systems.
TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM
IMPLEMENTATION: Air Technologies
1371 Air Stripping of Aqueous Solutions. Engineering
Bulletin
Order Number PB92-180033CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Oct 91
Air stripping is a means to transfer contaminants from aque-
ous solutions to air. Contaminants are not destroyed by air
stripping but are physically separated from the aqueous solu-
tions. Contaminant vapors are transferred into the air stream
and, if necessary, can be treated by incineration, adsorption,
or oxidation. Most frequently, contaminants are collected in
carbon adsorption systems and then treated or destroyed in
this concentrated form. The concentrated contaminants may
be recovered, incinerated for waste heat recovery, or de-
stroyed by other treatment technologies. Generally, air strip-
ping is used as one in a series of unit operations,and can
reduce the overall cost for managing a particular site. Air
stripping is applicable to volatile and semivolatile organic
, compounds. It is not applicable for treating metals and inor-
ganic compounds. The bulletin provides information on the
technology applicability, the technology limitations, a descrip-
tion of the technology, the types of residuals produced, site
requirements, the latest performance data, the status of the
technology, and sources of further information.
Specifications: See also PB88-106166 and DE89015653.
9p,
Subject index keywords: Liquid wastes, Waste treatment,
Air pollution control, Water pollution control, Air stripping.
1372 Air/Superfund National Technical Guidance Series.
Superfund Air Pathway Analyses Review Criteria
Checklists
Order Number PB90-182544CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
Radian Corp., Austin, TX.; Environmental Protection Agency,
Research Triangle Park, NC. Office of Air Quality Planning
and Standards; 17 Jan 90
The EPA has responsibility for assessment and cleanup of
superfund sites. Because air emissions pose a potential
human health risk at these sites, the EPA has developed a
set of procedures for evaluating these risks. The four check-
lists presented provide a systematic approach for air review-
ers to apply the air pathway assessment procedures. The
background, purpose, and application of the checklists are
discussed.
Specifications: See also PB90-113374, PB89-18.0053,
PB89-180061 and PB90-113382. Sponsored by Environmen-
tal Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, NC. Office of
Air Quality Planning and Standards. 63p.
Subject index keywords: Waste disposal, Hazardous mate-
rials, Risk assessment, Path of pollutants, Air pollution
effects(Humans), Superfund program, Air pollution sampling.
263
-------
TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Air
Technologies
1373 Air/Superfund National Technical Guidance Study
Series. Air Emissions from Area Sources: Estimating Soil
and Soli-Gas Sample Number Requirements
Order Number PB93-173995CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
Pacific Environmental Services, Inc., Herndon, VA.;
Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park,
NC. Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards; Mar 93
The document provides guidance regarding the necessary
number of soil gas or soil samples needed to estimate air
emissions from area sources. The Manual relies heavily on
statistical methods discussed in Appendix C of Volume II of
Air/Superfund National Technical Guidance Study Series
(EPA 1990) and Chapter 9 of SW-846 (EPA 1986). The tech-
niques in the manual are based on recognizing the inhom-
geniety of an area, by observation or screening samples,
before samples are taken. Each of the identified zones are
then sampled, using random sampling techniques, and statis-
tics calculated separately for each zone before combining
the statistics to provide an estimate for the entire area. The
statistical techniques presented may also be used to analyze
other types of data and provide measures such as mean,
variance, and standard deviation. The methods presented in
the Manual are based on small sample methods. Application
of the methods to data which are appropriately analyzed by
large sample methods or to data which is not normally dis-
tributed will give erroneous results.
Specifications: See also PB90-270588. Sponsored by Envi-
ronmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, NC.
Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards. 52p.
Subject index keywords: Air pollution sampling, Soil gases,
Soil surveys, Sampling, Hazardous materials.
1374 Air/Superfund National Technical Guidance Study
Series. Air Stripper Design Manual
Order Number PB91-125997CDH, price: PC A06/MF A01
Research Triangle Inst., Research Triangle Park, NC.;
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; May 90
A computer model package 'ASPAIR' was developed in the
project to describe the air stripping process along with proc-
esses for controlling the air emissions. The package is inte-
grated with a commercially available process simulator called
ASPEN to design and cost an air stripper and emission con-
trol system for specific applications. The applicability of the
ASPAIR model package was demonstrated through several
case studies which highlighted the effect of important param-
eters such as, Henry's Law constant, gas to liquid ratio, VOC
removal efficiency, and wastewater throughput. The results
of these case studies are presented in a graphical form to
allow quick 'short-cut' estimates of the performance and cost
of an air stripper and associated air emissions control units.
Two figures are provided in the manual that illustrate the
capital and annuaiized costs as a function of wastewater
flow rate and Henry's Law constant for a desired VOC re-
moval efficiency of 90%. Two additional figures are provided
that illustrate a similar cost correlation for a desired VOC re-
moval rate efficiency of 99%. The manual also provides cap-
ital and annuaiized costs graphs for catalytic oxidation and
carbon adsorption units used to control the emissions from
air strippers.
Specifications: See also PB90-207317. Sponsored by Envi-
ronmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response. 112p.
Subject index keywords: Manuals, Computerized simula-
tion, Strippers, Superfund, Remedial action, Water pollution
control equipment, Volatile organic compounds.
1375 Air/Superfund National Technical Guidance Study
Series: Applicability of Open Path Monitors for
Superfund
Order Number PB93-138154CDH, price: PC A07/MF A02
Radian Corp., Austin, TX.; Environmental Protection Agency,
Research Triangle Park, NC. Office of Air Quality Planning
and Standards; May 92
The document provides guidance on the applicability of
Open Path Monitors (OPMs) for ambient air monitoring at Su-
perfund sites. The relatively limited use of these devices for
ambient air monitoring has led to many questions concerning
their applicability, reliability, and sensitivity for these applica-
tions. Information is provided as to the general capabilities of
OPMs. The compounds that each method is capable of de-
tecting are tabulated. The detection limits of each type of in-
strument are discussed and compared to the detection limits
achievable using conventional techniques such as EPA
Method TO-14 as well as to short-term and long-term health-
based action levels. The data turnaround time and the ability
to resolve temporal variations in emissions are also dis-
cussed.
Specifications: See also PB89-180061, PB89-180053,
PB90-113382 and PB90-113374. Sponsored by Environmen-
tal Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, NC. Office of
Air Quality Planning and Standards. 136p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Remedial action, Path
of pollutants, Air pollution monitors, Hazardous materials,
Open Path Monitors.
1376 Air/Superfund National Technical Guidance Study
Series. Comparisons of Air Stripper Simulations and
Field Performance Data
Order Number PB90-207317CDH, price: PC A06/MF A01
PEI Associates, Inc., Cincinnati, OH.; Environmental
Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, NC. Office of Air
Quality Planning and Standards; Feb 90
One of the more common problems noted at Superfund sites
is the contamination of ground water by volatile organic com-
pounds (VOCs). One remedial alternative that is used to
reduce or remove the VOC contamination from water is air
stripping in a tower that uses either packing media or trays.
The ability to strip a compound from the water depends on
several factors, including the air/water ratio, the packing or
tray type, and the Henry's Law value for the compounds of
interest. The objective is to remove the VOCs from the
water. When being considered for remediation purposes, the
air stripper design should be evaluated for removal efficiency
and cost of operation. The purpose of the project was to col-
lect available design and operating data on operating air
strippers and to input the design and operating parameters
into the ASPEN simulator through a user interface program.
The results from the ASPEN simulator were compared to the
operating data gathered for the sites to determine the rela-
tive accuracy of the ASPEN model results when compared
with the actual performance data.
Specifications: See also PB90-182544. Sponsored by Envi-
ronmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, NC.
Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards. 112p.
264
-------
TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Air
Technologies
Subject index keywords: Ground water, Computerized sim-
ulation, Strippers, Superfund program, Remedial action, Vola-
tile organic compounds, Water pollution control equipment.
1377 Air/Superfund National Technical Guidance Study
Series: Compilation of Information on Real-Time Air
Monitoring for Use at Superfund Sites
Order Number PB93-199222CDH, price: PC A05/MF A02
Radian Corp., Austin, TX.; Environmental Protection Agency,
Dallas, TX. Region VI; May 93
The report summarizes the results of a U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency (EPA)-sponsored study to compile and
evaluate information on commercially-available real-time air
monitoring equipment for use at Superfund sites. In the docu-
ment, real-time (RT) and near real-time (NRT) monitors are
broadly defined as those instruments or methods that pro-
vide information either instantaneously or within a relatively
short time period (i.e., <30 minutes). The objectives of the
study were to review the available literature on real-time (RT)
air monitoring; compile a comprehensive list of real-time and
near real-time (NRT) air sampling techniques, equipment,
and vendors; contact vendors and users to collect informa-
tion on the technical specifications of their applicable instru-
ments; and prepare a guidance document that summarizes
the results of the study. The available literature was reviewed
to identify the most current methods for real-time or near
real-time measurement of ambient air concentrations of toxic
pollutants commonly found at Superfund sites.
Specifications: Sponsored by Environmental Protection
Agency, Dallas, TX. Region VI. 99p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Hazardous materials,
Waste disposal, Air pollution monitors, Real-time air moni-
tors.
1378 Air/Superfund National Technical Guidance Study
Series. Contingency Plans at Superfund Sites Using Air
Monitoring
Order Number PB91-102129CDH, price: PC A06/MF A01
PEI Associates, Inc., Cincinnati, OH.; Environmental
Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of Emergency
and Remedial Response; Sep 90
Air emissions from remedial or removal activities at Super-
fund sites can potentially have a significant impact on the
health arid safety of the individuals living and working around
the site. Contingency planning, as defined in the document,
encompasses the air program established to protect offsite
populations. Monitors for this purpose are usually located at
the site perimeter or within the community. The purpose of
the document is to: (1) illustrate contingency air monitoring
with examples from past projects, and (2) describe how a
contingency air monitoring program may be established. The
document is illustrative in nature because the application of
this type of monitoring is not consistently prescribed in rules
and regulations, but is based on professional judgment ap-
plied in an analysis of individual sites and particular circum-
stances.
Specifications: See also PB90-207317. Sponsored by Envi-
ronmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response. 107p.
Subject index keywords: Guidelines, Superfund, Air pollu-
tion monitoring, Contingency planning.
1379 Air/Superfund National Technical Guidance Study
Series. Database of Emission Rate Measurement
Projects
Order Number PB91-222059CDH, price: PC A06/MF A02
Radian Corp., Austin, TX.; Environmental Protection Agency,
Washington, DC. Office of Emergency and Remedial
Response; Jun 91
A compilation and evaluation of Volatile Organic Compound
(VOC) emission rate data was performed. The three primary
objectives were (1) to determine typical averages and ranges
of emissions for various types of sources; (2) to determine
the degree of correlation between emission rate results from
different sampling methods; and (30 to examine the effects
of different variables on measured emission rates. Emission
rate data are presented for 33 studies covering 13 types of
emission sources. The sources include landfills, surface im-
poundments, waste water treatment systems, leaking under-
ground storage tanks, soil piles and landfarms. The emission
rate data were obtained by using the Emission Isolation Flux
Chamber, Downhole Emissions Isolation Flux Chamber, the
Concentration Profile method and the Transect method. For
each source, the total non-methane hydrocarbon and ben-
zene emission rates are reported along with three other com-
pounds that had the highest emission rate. Source concen-
tration data (e.g. concentration in soil or waste water) are
also reported for comparison to the measured emission
rates.
Specifications: Sponsored by Environmental Protection
Agency, Washington, DC. Office of Emergency and Remedial
Response. 119p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Air pollution sampling,
Emission factors, Waste disposal, Sewage treatment, Land
pollution.
1380 Air/Superfund National Technical Guidance Study
Series. Development of Example Procedures for
Evaluating the Air Impacts of Soil Excavation Associated
with Superfund Remedial Actions
Order Number PB90-255662CDH, price: PC A05/MF A01
PEI Associates, Inc., Cincinnati, OH.; Radian Corp., Austin,
TX.*Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle
Park, NC. Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards; Jul
90
The purpose of the project was to identify and define the
computation requirements or estimating the air impacts from
the remediation of Superfund sites. Two example sites em-
ploying soil excavation were selected because they repre-
sent a complex emission source. The procedures for the
evaluation of the ambient impacts were divided into several
subtasks. These included site characterization, selection of
remedial alternatives, definition of remedial activities, estima-
tion of emission rates for each remedial activity, determina-
tion of ambient concentrations fromdispersion modeling, and
evaluation of carcinogenic and noncarcinogenic risks based
on dispersion modeling results. The calculation of emission
rates were used to estimate ambient impacts through disper-
sion models. The purpose was to outline a set of procedures
that could be used, with existing tools, to assist in the eval-
uation of air-pathway effects.
Specifications: Also pub. as Radian Corp., Austin, TX. rept.
no. DCN-90-203-080-61-02. Prepared in cooperation with
Radian Corp., Austin, TX. Sponsored by Environmental Pro-
265
-------
TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Air
technologies
tectfon Agency, Research Triangle Park, NC. Office of Air
Quality Planning and Standards. 80p.
Subject Index keywords: Soils, Excavation, Air pollution,
Remedial action, Volatile organic compounds, Emission
rates.
1381 Air/Superfund National Technical Guidance Study
Series. Emission Factors for Superfund Remediation
Technologies
Order Number PB9,1:19.Q975CDH, price: PC A05/MF A01
Radian Corp., Austin, TX.; Environmental Protection Agency,
Washington, DC. Office of Emergency and Remedial
Response; Mar 91
The report contains procedures and example calculations for
estimating air emissions that occur from treating contaminat-
ed material at Superfund sites. Emission factors for six treat-
ment technologies are presented. These are: (1) Thermal
Treatment, (2) Air Stripping, (3) Soil Vapor Extraction, (4) So-
lidification and Stabilization, (5) Physical and Chemical Treat-
ment, and (6) Biotreatment and Land Treatment. For each of
the six technologies, a literature review was conducted to de-
velopa flow diagram and identify emission points, as well as
to analyze available air emissions data. For most of the tech-
nologies examined, emission factors were based on available
data as well as assumed 'typical' operating conditions.
Where possible, however, emission factors were presented
on actual operating data from the site studies. Emission fac-
tors are presented for volatile organic compounds (VOC),
metals, particulate matter, SO2, NOx, CO, HCI, and HF. The
report also contains an extensive bibliography related to
waste treatment technologies.
Specifications: Sponsored by Environmental Protection
Agency, Washington, DC. Office of Emergency and Remedial
Response. 91 p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Emission factors, Re-
medial action, Waste treatment, Air pollution, Superfund.
1382 Atr/Superfund National Technical Guidance Study
Series: Estimation of Air Impacts for Air Stripping of
Contaminated Water
Order Number PB91-211888CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Radian Corp., Austin, TX.; Environmental Protection Agency,
Washington, DC. Office of Emergency and Remedial
Response; May 91
Analysis of the air impacts associated with the alternatives to
clearing up Superfund sites is frequently required for plan-
ning purposes prior to actual cleanup. Such analyses depend
on estimates rather than on field measurements. The report
provides procedures for estimating the emissions and ambi-
ent air concentrations associated with air stripping - a widely
used technique for removing volatile organic compounds
(VOC) from contaminated water. Procedures are given to
evaluate the effect of the concentration of contaminants in
water, the stripping efficiency and the stripping rate on the
emission rates and on the ambient air concentrations at se-
lected distances from the air stripper. Henry's Law constants
are |5fov!ded for over 130 compounds to assist in determin-
ing stripping efficiencies. Health-based action levels are also
provided for the 130 compounds for comparison to the esti-
mated ambient air concentrations. Action levels are also ex-
pressed in terms of water concentrations using conservative
estimates of emissions and dispersion.
Specifications: See also PB91-190975. Sponsored by Envi-
ronmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response. 36p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Remedial action,
Water pollution control, Air pollution effects(Humans), Toxic
substances, Public health.
1383 Air/Superfund National Technical Guidance Study
Series: Estimation of Air Impacts for Soil Vapor
Extraction (SVE) Systems
Order Number PB92-143676CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Radian Corp., Austin, TX.; Environmental Protection Agency,
Research Triangle Park, NC. Office of Air Quality Planning
and Standards; Jan 92
The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's Office of Air
Quality Planning and Standards and the Regional Air Offices
have been given the responsibility to evaluate air impacts
from Superfund sites. The report provides procedures for
roughly estimating the ambient air concentrations associated
with soil vapor extraction (SVE). The procedures for SVE
systems are analogous to procedures for air strippers that
have previously been published. SVE is also known as soil
venting, vacuum extraction, aeration, or in-situ volatilization. It
is a widely used technique for removing volatile organic com-
pound (VOC) vapors from contaminated soil. Procedures are
given to evaluate the effect of the concentration of the con-
taminants in the soil-gas and the extraction rate on the emis-
sion rates and on the ambient air concentrations at selected
distances from the SVE system.
Specifications: See also PB89-159396, PB91-168476, and
PB91-211888. Sponsored by Environmental Protection
Agency, Research Triangle Park, NC. Office of Air Quality
Planning and Standards. 44p.
Subject index keywords: Air pollution abatement, Environ-
mental impacts, Hazardous materials, Superfund, Remedial
action, Soil vapor extraction, Volatile organic compounds.
1384 Air Superfund National Technical Guidance Study
Series. Estimation of Air Impacts for the Excavation of
Contaminated Soil
Order Number PB92-171925CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
Radian Corp., Austin, TX.; Environmental Protection Agency,
Research Triangle Park, NC. Office of Air Quality Planning
and Standards; 18 Mar 92
Analysis of the air impacts associated with cleaning up Su-
perfund sites is frequently required prior to actual cleanup.
Such analyses depend on estimates rather than on field
measurements. This report provides procedures for estimat-
ing the emissions of volatile organic compounds (VOC) and
the ambient air concentrations associated with the excava-
tion of contaminated soil. Excavation is an integral part of
any Superfund site remediation that involves removal or ex-
situ treatment such as incineration, thermal desorption, biore-
mediation, or solidification/stabilization. The report contains
procedures to evaluate the effect of the concentration of the
contaminants in the soil and the excavation rate on the emis-
sion rates and on the ambient air concentrations at selected
distances from the excavation site. Health-based ambient air
action levels are also provided for comparison to the estimat-
ed ambient concentrations.
Specifications: See also PB92-171917 and PB92-171909.
Sponsored by Environmental Protection Agency, Research
266
-------
TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Air
Technologies
Triangle Park, NO. Office of Air Quality Planning and Stand-
ards. 59p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Air pollution sampling,
Toxic substances, Waste management, Remedial action.
1385 Air/Superfund National Technical Guidance Study
Series: Estimation of Air Impacts from Area Sources of
Particulate Matter Emissions at Superfund Sites
Order Number PB93-215648CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Radian Corp., Austin, TX.; Environmental Protection Agency,
Research Triangle Park, NC. Office of Air Quality Planning
and Standards; Apr 93
The report provides procedures for estimating the ambient
air concentrations associated with emissions of particulate
matter from soils handling operations at Superfund sites. Ma-
terials handling operations are necessary at any site where
ex-situ treatment is performed. In addition, soils handling op-
erations, such as excavation or grading, are frequently per-
formed as part of site preparation. Procedures are given to
evaluate the effect of the handling rate and contaminant
concentration on the emission rates and on the ambient air
concentrations at selected distances from the treatment
area. Health-based ambient air action levels are also provid-
ed for comparison to the estimated ambient concentrations.
Specifications: See also PB93-215655. Sponsored by Envi-
ronmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, NC.
Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards. 44p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Remediation, Ambient
air quality, Particulates.
1386 Air/Superfund National Technical Guidance Study
Series: Evaluation of Short-Term Air Action Levels for
Superfund Sites
Order Number PB93-200913CDH, price: PC A14/MF A03
Radian Corp., Austin, TX.; Environmental Protection Agency,
Washington, DC. Office of Emergency and Remedial
Response; May 93
The report summarizes the results of an EPA-sponsored
study to compile and evaluate information on short-term air
action levels (AALs) used at Superfund sites. Because there
is no simple or widely accepted method for estimating the
risks of short-term exposures, there are no uniformly accept-
ed short-term air action levels for emissions from Superfund
sites. Air action levels have been established in a variety of
ways, depending on waste types at the site, state guidelines,
the potential for air emissions, cost, and individual project
manager discretion. State and local guidelines are often
based on occupational exposure limits (e.g., Threshold Limit
Values) that have been divided by a safety factor to account
for the differences in population and exposure of workers
and residents. Some states are adopting other approaches,
including the use of U.S. EPA-developed inhalation Refer-
ence Concentrations (RfCs).
Specifications: Sponsored by Environmental Protection
Agency, Washington, DC. Office of Emergency and Remedial
Response. 305p.
Subject index keywords: Air pollution monitoring, Super-
fund, Hazardous materials, Waste disposal, Air action levels,
Short term exposure.
1387 Air/Superfund National Technical Guidance Study
Series. Guideline for Predictive Baseline Emissions
Estimation Procedures for Superfund Sites
Order Number PB92-171909CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Quality Management, Inc., Durham, NC.;
Environmental Protection Agency, New York. Region II; Jan
92
The purpose of the project was to develop a guideline for
using the preferred EPA-approved predictive models to esti-
mate air pathway exposure point concentrations for input to
Superfund site Baseline Risk Assessments. The document
provides the sequential series of steps necessary to accom-
plish the baseline air pathway analysis by predictive means.
Specifications: See also PB92-171917, PB92-171925 and
PB92-143676. Sponsored by Environmental Protection
Agency, New York. Region II. 30p.
Subject index keywords: Air pollution sampling, Superfund,
Waste management, Remedial action, Toxic substances.
1388 Air/Superfund National Technical Guidance Study
Series. Models for Estimating Air Emission Rates from
Superfund Remedial Actions
Order Number PB93-186807CDH, price: PC A08/MF A02
Radian Corp., Austin, TX.; Environmental Protection Agency,
Washington, DC. Office of Emergency and Remedial
Response; Mar 93
The report is a compendium of models (equations) for esti-
mating air emissions from Superfund sites undergoing reme-
diation. These models predict emission rates of volatile or-
ganic compounds (VOC's) and particulate matter (PM) from
both area and point sources. The following remedial process-
es are covered: air stripping, soil vapor extraction, thermal
desorption, thermal destruction (incineration), excavation,
dredging, solidification/stabilization, and bioremediation.
Emission estimation methods are also presented for landfills,
lagoons, and spills/leaks/open waste pits. The models con-
tained in the compendium will not accurately predict emis-
sions for all possible scenarios.
Specifications: Sponsored by Environmental Protection
Agency, Washington, DC. Office of Emergency and Remedial
Response. 163p.
Subject index keywords: Volatile organic compounds,
Emissions, Air pollution control, Mathematical models, Super-
fund.
1389 Air Superfund National Technical Guidance Study
Series. Screening Procedures for Estimating the Air
Impacts of Incineration at Superfund Sites
Order Number PB92-171917CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
International Technology Corp., Durham, NC.; Environmental
Protection Agency, New York. Region II; Feb 92
The purpose of the project was to develop screening proce-
dures for estimating the air impacts of incineration at Super-
fund sites. The document outlines procedures for estimating
uncontrolled and controlled emission rates of hydrocarbons,
particulate matter, metals, acid gases and other contami-
nants as well as screening procedures for estimating ambient
air concentrations of these contaminants. The document also
provides screening evaluation procedures for compliance
with applicable or relevant and appropriate requirements
(ARARs) and for health effects.
267
-------
TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Air
Technologies
Specifications: See also PB92-171925 and PB92-171909.
Sponsored by Environmental Protection Agency, New York.
Region II. 70p.
Subject index keywords: Air pollution sampling, Superfund,
Toxic substances, Waste management, Remedial action.
1390 Air/Superfund National Technical Guidance Study
Series. Volume 1. Application of Air Pathway Analyses
for Superfund Activities
Order Number P^B9g::113§74CDH, price: PC A06/MF A01
NUS Cprp., Gaithersburg, MD.; Radian Corp., Sacramento,
GA.*Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle
Park, NC, Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards; Jul
89
The report is one in a series of manuals dealing with air
pathway analysis at hazardous waste sites. The document
was developed for the Office of Air Quality Planning and
Standards in cooperation with the Office of Emergency and
Remedial Response (Superfund). The document is an interim
final manual offering technical guidance for use by a diverse
audience including EPA Air and Superfund Regional and
Headquarters staff, State air and Superfund program staff,
Federal and State remedial and removal contractors, and po-
tentially responsible parties in analyzing air pathways at haz-
ardous waste sites. The manual provides for flexibility in tai-
loring the air pathway analysis to the specific conditions of
each site.
Specifications: See also Volume 2, PB89-180053. Prepared
in cooperation with Radian Corp., Sacramento, CA. Spon-
sored by Environmental Protection Agency, Research Trian-
gle Park, NC. Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards.
118p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Air pollution,
Waste disposal.
1391 Air/Superfund National Technical Guidance Study
Series. Volume 1. Overview of Air Pathway Assessments
for Superfund Sites (Revised)
Ordern Number PB93;173987CDH, price: PC A05/MF A01
Radian Corp., AustinJ TX.;' Environmental Protection Agency,
Research Triangle Park, NC. Office of Air Quality Planning
and Standards; Npv 92
The document introduces and provides an overview of air
pathway assessments for Superfund sites. The specific ob-
jectives of the document are to (1) introduce the basic ele-
ments of air pathway assessments (APA) for Superfund sites;
(2) identify and discuss the key issues related to APA work;
and (3) identify the best sources of published information
and guidance for each typical component of APA work. An
APA is a systematic evaluation of the potential or actual ef-
fects on air quality of an emission source such as a Super-
fund site. The APA may involve modeling or monitoring to
estimate these effects. The primary components of an APA
are: characterization of air emission sources; determination
of the effects of atmospheric processes such as transport
and dilution; and evaluation of the exposure potential at re-
ceptors of interest.
Specifications: Supersedes PB90-113374. Sponsored by
Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park,
NC. Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards. 86p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Environmental expo-
sure pathway, Risk assessment, Air pollution monitoring.
268
1392 Air/Superfund National Technical Guidance Study
Series. Volume 2. Estimation of Baseline Air Emissions
at Superfund Sites (Revised)
Order Number PB90-270588CDH, price: PC A17/MF A03
Radian Corp., Austin, TX.; Environmental Protection Agency,
Research Triangle Park, NC. Office of Air Quality Planning
and Standards; Aug 90
The report presents available methods for estimating air
emissions at Superfund hazardous waste sites prior to any
remedial action. The report revises and expands an earlier
report, Procedures For Conducting Air Pathway Analyses For
Superfund Activities, Volume II, Estimation Of Baseline Air
Emissions At Superfund Sites, EPA-450/1-89-002. The pur-
pose of the report is to assist EPA Air and Superfund staff,
State Air Superfund program staff, Federal and State remedi-
al and removal contractors, potentially responsible parties
and others in designing, conducting, and reviewing air path-
way analyses at undisturbed hazardous waste sites.
Specifications: See also PB89-180053. Sponsored by Envi-
ronmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, NC.
Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards. 390p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Air pollution.
1393 Air/Superfund National Technical Guidance Study
Series. Volume 4. Guidance for Ambient Air Monitoring
at Superfund Sites (Revised)
Order Number PB93-199214CDH, price: PC A08/MF A02
Radian Corp., Austin, TX.; Environmental Protection Agency,
Research Triangle Park, NC. Office of Air Quality Planning
and Standards; May 93
The report presents the results of an EPA-sponsored study
to develop guidance for designing and conducting ambient
air monitoring at Superfund sites. By law, all exposure path-
ways - including the air pathway - must be evaluated for
every Superfund site; therefore, some level of ambient air
monitoring usually is necessary at each site. The document
offers technical guidance for use by a diverse audience, in-
cluding EPA Air and Superfund Regional and Headquarters
staff, State Air and Superfund staff, federal and state remedi-
al and removal contractors, and potentially responsible par-
ties. The manual is written to serve the needs of individuals
with various levels of scientific training and experience in se-
lecting and using ambient air monitoring methods in support
of air pathway assessments.
Specifications: Supersedes PB90-113382. See also PB89-
180061. Sponsored by Environmental Protection Agency, Re-
search Triangle Park, NC. Office of Air Quality Planning and
Standards. 172p.
Subject index keywords: Air pollution monitoring, Hazard-
ous materials, Waste disposal, Superfund.
1394 Air/Superfund National Technical Guidance Study
Series. Volume 4. Procedures for Dispersion Modeling
and Air Monitoring for Superfund Air Pathway Analysis
Order Number PB90-113382CDH, price: PC A14/MF A01
NUS Corp., Gaithersburg, MD.; Radian Corp., Sacramento,
CA.*Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle
Park, NC. Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards; Jul
89
The report is one in a series of manuals dealing with air
pathway analysis at hazardous waste sites. The document
was developed for the Office of Air Quality Planning and
Standards in cooperation with the Office of Emergency and
-------
TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Air
Technologies
Remedial Response (Superfund). The document is an interim
final manual offering technical guidance for use by a diverse
audience including EPA Air and Superfund Regional and
Headquarters staff, State Air and Superfund program staff,
Federal and State remedial and removal contractors, and po-
tentially responsible parties in analyzing air pathways at haz-
ardous waste sites. The manual provides for flexibility in tai-
loring the air pathway analysis to the specific conditions of
each site, the relative risk posed by this and other pathways,
and the program resource constraints.
Specifications: See also Volume 1, PB90-113374. Prepared
in cooperation with Radian Corp., Sacramento, CA. Spon-
sored by Environmental Protection Agency, Research Trian-
gle Park, NC. Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards.
309p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste dis-
posal, Air pollution.
1395 Assessing Potential Indoor Air Impacts for
Superfund Sites. Air/Superfund National Technical
Guidance Study Series
Order Number PB93-122257CDH, price: PC A09/MF A03
Pacific Environmental Services, Inc., Herndon, VA.;
Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park,
NC. Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards; Sep 92
The manual for assessing indoor air impacts was developed
to be used for buildings proximate to Superfund sites. The
procedures and methods may also be applied to other as-
sessments of hazardous wastes and hazardous materials.
The purpose is to provide information on methods and tech-
niques that can be used to assess the potential or actual
impact a Superfund site may have on the indoor air quality of
buildings proximate to the site in order that the risk to the
occupants from this source may be estimated. The manual is
designed to provide the tools needed to assist in the identifi-
cation and resolution of indoor air quality concerns at Super-
fund site.
Specifications: Sponsored by Environmental Protection
Agency, Research Triangle Park, NC. Office of Air Quality
Planning and Standards. 196p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Indoor air pollution, Air
pollution monitoring, Hazardous materials, Environmental
impact assessments.
1396 Canister-Based Method for Monitoring Toxic VOCs
in Ambient Air
Order Number PB92-206432CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park,
NC. Atmospheric Research and Exposure Assessment Lab.;
ManTech Environmental Technology, Inc., Research Triangle
Park, NC.**BatteIle Memorial Inst., Columbus,
OH.**Engineering Science, Gary, NC; c1991
The availability of reliable, accurate and precise monitoring
methods for toxic volatile organic compounds (VOCs) is a
primary need for state and local agencies addressing daily
monitoring requirements related to odor complaints, fugitive
emissions, and trend monitoring. The canister-based monitor-
ing method for VOCs is a viable and widely used approach
that is based on research and evaluation performed over the
past several years. The activity has involved the testing of
sample stability of VOCs in canisters and the design of time-
integrative samplers. The development of procedures for
analysis of samples in canisters, including the procedure for
VOC preconcentration from whole air, the treatment of water
vapor in the sample, and the selection of an appropriate ana-
lytical finish has been accomplished. The canister-based
method was initially summarized in the EPA Compendium of
Methods for the Determination of Toxic Organic Compounds
in Ambient Air as Method TO-14. Modifications and refine-
ments are being added to Method TO-14 in order to obtain a
Statement of Work for the Superfund Contract Laboratory
Program for Air. The paper discusses the developments
leading to the current status of the canister-based method
and provides a critique of the method using results obtained
in EPA monitoring networks. (Copyright (c) 1991 - Air and
Waste Management Association.)
Specifications: Pub. in Jnl. of the Air and Waste Manage-
ment Association, v41 n10 Oct 91. See also PB90-127374.
Prepared in cooperation with ManTech Environmental Tech-
nology, Inc., Research Triangle Park, NC., Battelle Memorial
Inst., Columbus, OH., and Engineering Science, Gary, NC.
13p.
Subject index keywords: Volatile organic compounds, Air
pollution monitoring, Air samplers, Cans, Air pollution detec-
tion.
1397 Comparison of Organic Emissions from Hazardous
Waste Incinerators versus the 1990 Toxic Release
Inventory Air Releases
Order Number PB94-112836CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk
Reduction Engineering Lab; 1993
Incineration is often the preferred technology for disposing of
hazardous waste and remediating Superfund sites. The ef-
fective implementation of the technology is frequently imped-
ed by strong public opposition to hazardous waste inciner-
ation (HWI). One of the reasons cited for this opposition is
the perception that the emission of organics pose an unrea-
sonable threat to human health. In order to put organic emis-
sions in perspective, the mass of these emissions from the
incineration of hazardous waste on a national scale has been
estimated using 'reasonable worst-case' assumptions and
compared to the 1990 Toxics Release Inventory (TRI) air re-
leases. Comparisons were made for 15 carcinogenic organic
compounds and 17 non-carcinogenic organic compounds.
(Copyright (c) 1993 - Air and Waste Management Associa-
tion.)
Specifications: Pub. in Jnl. of the Air and Waste Manage-
ment Association, v43 p1374-1379 Oct 93. 8p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Incinerators,
Organic compounds, Combustion products.
1398 Control of Air Emissions from Materials Handling
during Remediation. Engineering Bulletin
Order Number PB92-180041CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Oct 91
The bulletin presents an overview discussion on the impor-
tance of and methods for controlling emissions into the air
from materials handling processes at Superfund or other
hazardous waste sites. It also describes several techniques
used for dust and vapor suppression that have been applied
at Superfund sites. The bulletin provides information on the
applicability of air emission controls for materials handling at
Superfund sites, limitations of the current systems, a descrip-
tion of the control methods that have found application to
date, site requirements, a summary of the performance expe-
269
-------
TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Air
Technologies
rience, the status of the existing techniques and identification
of future development expectations, and sources of addition-
al information.
Specifications: See also PB85-124881 and PB90-113374.
9p.
Subject index keywords: Air pollution control, Materials
handling, Remedial action, Waste management, Hazardous
materials.
1399 Control of Air Emissions from Superfund Air
Strippers at Superfund Groundwater Sites
Order Number PB90-272667CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; 15 Jun 89
The directive establishes guidance on control of air emis-
sions from air strippers used at Superfund sites for ground-
water treatment. The joint memorandum from Office Direc-
tors, OERR, and Air Quality Planning and Standards, estab-
lishes procedures for implementation.
Specifications: 8p.
Subject index keywords: Air pollution control equipment,
Hazardous materials, Strippers, Superfund, Office of Solid
Waste and Emergency Response, Waste management.
1400 Control of Air Emissions from Superfund Sites
Order Number PB93-215614CpH, price: PC A08/MF A02
Radian Corp., Austin, TX".'; Environmental Protection Agency,
Cincinnati, OH. Center for Environmental Research
Information; Nov 92
The Intended audience for the handbook are engineers and
scientists involved in preparing Remedial Design (RD) plans
for Superfund sites The handbook contains a summary of
existing information and an overview of the topic of air emis-
sion controls is presented. The handbook contains back-
ground information to familiarize the user with the technical
basis for each control technology. Specific guidance is pro-
vided to assist the user in limiting the choices of potential
control technologies and in selecting a specific set of control
technologies for a given application. References are included
for users seeking more detailed guidance. The handbook is a
screening tool and is not intended to provide detailed techni-
cal specifications for preparing bid packages.
Specifications: See also PB86-151677. Sponsored by Envi-
ronmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Center for En-
vironmental Research Information. 163p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Air pollution control
equipment, Hazardous materials, Remediation.
1401 Control of Transient Incinerator Emissions with an
Oxygen Based Combustion System
Order Number PB91-182725CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Union Carbide Industrial Gases, Inc., Tarrytown, NY.; Foster
Wheeler Enviresponse, inc., Edison, NJ.*Environmental
Protec,tion Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk Reduction
Engineering Lab; 1990
The subject of the paper is the experience with a novel and
field-proven method for the enhanced control of transient
emissions from rotary kiln incinerators using oxygen enrich-
ment. When high-BTU content wastes are fed into rotary kiln
incinerators in an intermittent mode (typical of ram feed sys-
tems), the transient combustion behavior of these materials
creates unsteady releases of combustible gases which may
momentarily deplete the oxygen content of kiln gases. These
temporary oxygen-deficient conditions could cause the re-
lease of products of incomplete combustion (PICs). Release
of PICs from incinerators has raised public concern and has
been the subject of research projects sponsored by the EPA.
The enhanced control of transient emissions was demon-
strated by the field operation of the EPA Mobile Incineration
System (MIS) at the Denney Farm Superfund Site in
McDowell, Missouri. During the field operation of the MIS,
large quantities of high-BTU content wastes were burned pe-
riodically. These materials were ram-fed into the rotary kiln at
a frequency of about twice a minute. To respond to the tran-
sient oxygen demand resulting from the burning of these ma-
terials, a unique oxygen feedforward-feedback control logic
was designed into the LINDE Oxygen Combustion System
(OCS) which was retrofitted into the MIS in 1987. After imple-
mentation of the OCS, transient upset conditions were signifi-
cantly reduced during the operation of the MIS. Low NOx
emissions were also achieved.
Specifications: Presented at the Haztech International '90
held in Houston, TX. on May 8-10, 1990. Prepared in coop-
eration with Foster Wheeler Enviresponse, Inc., Edison, NJ.
Sponsored by Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati,
OH. Risk Reduction Engineering Lab. 25p.
Subject index keywords: Air pollution control, Incineration,
Kilns, Combustion efficiency, Waste disposal, Oxygen com-
bustion system.
1402 Design Considerations for Ambient Air Monitoring
at Superfund Sites. Engineering Bulletin
Order Number PB94-102407CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Nov 92
The Engineering Bulletin is intended to help the RPM design
the site-specific air monitoring program needed before, and
during site remediation. The types of AAM activities of inter-
est at Superfund sites are selecting the most appropriate ap-
proach, establishing the data quality objectives, and selecting
the proper sampling and analytical techniques. Key design
considerations, limitations, a procedure for designing the air
monitoring program, and other relevant technical information
regarding AAM at Superfund sites are presented. The bulletin
also provides a point of contact for further information.
Specifications: 9p.
Subject index keywords: Air pollution sampling, Superfund,
Documents.
1403 Engineered Biofilter for Removing Organic
Contaminants in Air
Order Number PB94-163532CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Aluminum Co. of America, Pittsburgh, PA.; Environmental
Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk Reduction
Engineering Lab; cMar 94
Biofiltration is an established economic air pollution control
technology for removing organic contaminants in air. An en-
gineered biofilter using synthetic media, such as activated
carbon, has been developed that shows improvements in re-
moval efficiency, biodegradation and space requirements
over the existing filters. This carbon filter has been operated
for > 11 months in a bench-top unit, accomplishing > or =
90 percent removal efficiency consistently in a stream con-
taining 10 to 20 ppm of toluene. The mass transfer zone re-
mained stationary and extremely short (1 to 4 seconds of
empty bed contact time) during the entire operating period.
Compared with existing filters, this engineered filter showed
270
-------
TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Air
Technologies
40 to 80 times greater biodegradation efficiency u.nder the
selected conditions, resulting in a decreased space require-
ment and other advantages in equipment sizing. (Copyright
(c) 1994 - Air & Water Management Association.)
Specifications: Pub. in Jnl. of the Air and Waste Manage-
ment, v44 n3 p299-303, Mar 94. Sponsored by Environmen-
tal Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk Reduction Engi-
neering Lab. 7p.
Subject index keywords: Filtration, Scrubbers, Air pollution
control.
1404 Engineering Bulletin: Air Pathway Analysis
Order Number PB93-163046CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk
Reduction Engineering Lab; Nov 92
The bulletin presents information on estimating toxic air
emissions from Superfund sites. The focus is on the collec-
tion of air emissions data during the site inspection and re-
medial investigation/feasibility study and the use of these
data for the selection or implementation of treatment tech-
nologies. Emissions of volatile compounds and paniculate
matter during site disturbances, such as excavation, may be
several orders of magnitude greater than the emissions level
of an undisturbed site. The potential air emissions from the
undisturbed and disturbed site must be considered before
developing a site mitigation strategy.
Specifications: See also PB89-180053, PB89-180061
PB90-113374, PB90-113382 and PB92-180033. 1.0p. :
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Toxic substances, Air
pollution, Waste disposal, Air Pathway Analysis.
1405 Engineering Bulletin: Technology Preselection Data
Requirements
Order Number PB93-105591CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Oct 92
The bulletin provides a listing of soil, water, and contaminant
data elements needed to evaluate the potential applicability
of technologies for treating contaminated soils and water.
With this base set of data in hand, experts familiar with the
applicability of treatment technologies can better focus the
advice and assistance they give to those involved at Super-
fund sites. The data compiled should permit preselection of
applicable treatment methods and the direct elimination of
others. This bulletin emphasizes the site physical and chemi-
cal soil and water characteristics for which observations and
measurements should be compiled. Gathering and analyzing
the information called for in this bulletin prior to extensive
field investigations will facilitate streamlining and targeting of
the sampling and analytical objectives of the overall program.
Specifications: 9p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste treatment, Soil
treatment, Hazardous materials, Water pollution, Data re-
quirements.
1406 Estimating VOC Emissions from Superfund Sites in
the Houston-Galveston Texas Area. (NNEMS Project No.
1302) J
Order Number PB92-196013CDH, price: PC A06
Environmental Protection Agency, Dallas, TX. Region VI; Aug
90
The purpose of the report focused on estimating the volatile
organic compound (VOC) emissions from Superfund sites in
. the Houston-Galveston-Brazoria Consolidated Metropolitan
Statistical Area and the Buemont-Port Artur Metropolitan Sta-
tistical Area. Research of available data in the Environmental
Protection Agency Region VI files is expanded over a three
month time period. The intention of the project was to esti-
mate a tons per year VOC emissions rate. All the data and
information presented in the paper on VOC emissions from
Superfund sites was obtained from publicly available
sources.
Specifications: Portions of this document are not fully legi-
ble. 107p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Air pollution,
Standard Metropolitan Statistical Areas, Texas, Superfund.
1407 Estimation of Air Impacts for Bioventing Systems
Used at Superfund Sites. Air/Superfund National
Technical Guidance Study Series
Order Number PB93-215655CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
Radian Corp., Austin, TX.; Environmental Protection Agency,
Washington, DC. Office of Emergency and Remedial
Response; Apr 93
The report provides procedures for estimating the ambient
air concentrations associated with bioventing. Bioventing is
an insitu remediation process where oxygen is introduced to
the contaminated subsurfaces to enhance biodegradation
rates of the organic contaminants. Procedures are given to
evaluate the effect of exhaust gas flow rate and contaminant
concentration on the emission rates and on the ambient air
concentrations at selected distances from the area. Health-
based ambient air action levels are also provided for compar-
ison to the estimated ambient concentrations.
Specifications: See also PB93-215622. Sponsored by Envi-
ronmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response. 54p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Remediation, Ambient
air quality, Bioventing.
1408 Estimation of Air Impacts for Solidification and
Stabilization Processes Used at Superfund Sites. Air/
Superfund National Technical Guidance Study Series
Order Number PB93-215622CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
Radian Corp., Austin, TX.; Environmental Protection Agency,
Washington, DC. Office of Emergency and Remedial
Response; Apr 93
The report provides procedures for estimating the ambient
air concentrations associated with solidification/stabilization
of contaminated soil or sludge. Solidification/stabilization
processes are used to immobilize toxic and hazardous con-
stituents in the contaminated soil or sludge. Procedures are
given to evaluate the effect of the treatment rate and con-
taminant concentration on the emission rates and on the am-
bient air concentrations at selected distances from the treat-
ment area. Health-based ambient air action levels are also
provided for comparison to the estimated ambient concentra-
tions.
Specifications: See also PB93-215630, PB87-116745 and
PB93-186807. Sponsored by Environmental Protection
Agency, Washington, DC. Office of Emergency and Remedial
Response. 54p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Remediation, Ambient
air quality, Stabilization, Solidification.
271
-------
TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Air
Technologies
1409 Estimation of Air Impacts for Thermal Desorption
Units Used at Superfund Sites. Air/Superfund National
Technical Guidance Study Series
Order Number PB93-215630CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
Radian Corp., Austin, TX.; Environmental Protection Agency,
Washington, DC. Office of Emergency and Remedial
Response; Apr 93
The report provides procedures for estimating the ambient
air concentrations associated with thermal desorption. Ther-
mal Sesorption is a treatment process where heat is used to
physically remove organic compounds from soils and
sludges. Procedures are given to evaluate the effect of the
treafjirient rate and contaminant concentration on the emis-
sion rates and on the ambient air concentrations at selected
distances from the treatment area. Health-based ambient air
action levels are also provided for comparison to the estimat-
ed ambient concentrations.
Specifications: See also PB93-215648. Sponsored by Envi-
ronmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response. 54p.
Subject Index keywords: Superfund, Remediation, Ambient
air quality, Thermal desorption.
1410 Evaluation of Emission Factors for Formaldehyde
from Certain Wood Processing Operations. Final Report,
May-August 1989
Order Number PB90-254988CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Radian Corp., Research Triangle Park, NC.; Environmental
Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, NC. Air and
Energy Engineering Research Lab; Jun 90
The report gives results of a search for information on form-
aldehyde emissions from wood veneer operations, to devel-
op emission factors for the industry. Formaldehyde releases
of 246 kg were reported under Title III of the Superfund
Amendments and Reauthprization Act (SARA) of 1986 from
a large plywood plant in Mississippi. However, existing data
found during the study period were insufficient to allow reli-
able emission factors to be calculated.
Specifications: See also PB88-118492. Sponsored by Envi-
ronmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, NC.
Air and Energy Engineering Research Lab. 33p.
Subject index keywords: Formaldehyde, Air pollution con-
trol, Emission factors, Wood products industry.
1411 Foam Scrubbing (Chapter 9)
Order Number PB93-236560CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Foster Wheeler Enviresponse, Inc., Livingston, NJ.;
Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk
Reduction Engineering Lab; 15 Sep 93
Aqueous foam is a mixture of air (or other gas), surfactant
and water. Foam can be used in at least two ways for emis-
sion control: foam blanketing and foam scrubbing. Foam
scrubbing differs from blanketing in that the foam (usually
high-expansion) is blown using the contaminated air that is to
be treated. Thus, in foam scrubbing the contaminant is inside
the foam bubbles. While the release is contained in this
manner, a scrubbing process can take place. The foam solu-
tion can be formulated to include an appropriate reagent that
can 'neutralize1 the absorbed gases, if necessary (for exam-
ple, an acidic additive to neutralize ammonia). Potential appli-
cations of foam scrubbing for emergency control are many:
the chemical industry (ammonia, hydrogen chloride, sulfuric
acid, etc.), municipalities (chlorine tanks at water treatment
facilities), and emergency responders (chemical spills, tank
truck accidents, etc.) Foam scrubbing could also be used at
Superfund sites during excavation to safeguard workers and
surrounding communities from releases of volatile toxic ma-
terials. The chapter summarizes the available information on
foam scrubbing, including results of an EPA research pro-
gram on the subject. Although largely still in the research
stage, the information available to date is encouraging.
Specifications: Pub. in Prevention and Control of Acciden-
tal Releases of Hazardous Gases, p232-252 Jun 93. See
also PB82-227117. Sponsored by Environmental Protection
Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk Reduction Engineering Lab.
22p.
Subject index keywords: Air pollution control, Foam, Fugi-
tive emissions, Foam scrubbing.
1412 Instructional Package on Regulatory Air Quality
Modeling. Part 1: Videos on the 'Guideline on Air Quality
Models (Revised)' and the Model Clearinghouse (Video)
Order Number PB94-780012CDH, price: Call for price
Pacific Environmental Services, Inc., Research Triangle Park,
NC.; Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle
Park, NC. Technical Support Div; Jun 92
Video tape presentations describe the major regulatory air
modeling guidance document, the 'Guideline on Air Quality
Models (Revised),' and the Agency's focal point for reviewing
the use of dispersion modeling techniques, the Model Clear-
inghouse. The intended audience for these materials is those
professionals who have some technical experience using a
personal computer (PC) and whose responsibilities now in-
clude running EPA's air quality models (1) to assess the
impact of emissions from new or modified sources or air
toxics releases, or (2) to replicate the model results submit-
ted in conjunction with such regulatory programs as New
Source Review (NSR), Prevention of Significant Deterioration
(PSD), National Ambient Air Quality Standard (NAAQS) at-
tainment demonstrations, Superfund (SARA), and others.
Specifications: This VHS video is 1/2 inch, color, stereo
sound, playing time of 60 minutes with instructions sheets in-
cluded in package. Part 2 (Diskette Version) is available as
PB94-500626. Sponsored by Environmental Protection
Agency, Research Triangle Park, NC. Technical Support Div.
1 VHS video.
Subject index keywords: Air pollution dispersion, Pollution
regulations, Models.
1413 Long-Path FTIR Measurements of Volatile Organic
Compounds in an Industrial Setting (July 1989-April
1991)
Order Number PB92-206424CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
NSl Technology Services Corp., Research Triangle Park,
NC.; MDA Scientific, Inc., Norcross, GA.**Nicolet Instrument
Corp., Madison, WI.*Environmental Protection Agency,
Research Triangle Park, NC. Atmospheric Research and
Exposure Assessment Lab; c1991
As part of a Superfund Innovative Technology Evaluation
(SITE) field program, a Fourier transform infrared (FTIR)
spectrometer was used to make open path measurements of
volatile organic compounds in the New Castle, Delaware,
area. The SITE program requires that new technologies be
compared with more mature measurement techniques. In this
case, a canister-based sampling and analytical methodology
was chosen to compare with the FTIR measurements. Whole
air samples were collected in the canisters as they were re-
272
-------
TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Air
Technologies
peated y transported along the open measurement path of
the FTIR spectrometer. FTIR spectra were co-added for 32-
min sampling intervals. Conclusions were: (1) that the FTIR
system as it is currently configured can be used as a reliable
monitoring instrument when the concentrations are greater
han about 50 ppbv; (2) that transporting the canisters along
the path is a viable technique for comparing long-path and
point-sampler measurements.
Specifications: Pub. in Jnl. of the Air and Waste Manage-
ment Association, v41 n8 p1062-1066 Aug 91. Prepared in
cooperation with MDA Scientific, Inc., Norcross, GA. and Ni-
coiet Instrument Corp., Madison, Wl. Sponsored by Environ-
mental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park NC At-
mospheric Research and Exposure Assessment Lab. 7p.
Subject index keywords: Volatile organic compounds Infra-
red spectrometers, Hazardous materials, Superfund.
1414 Measurement of Volatile Organic Compounds during
Start-Up of Bioremediation of French Limited Superfund
Site in Crosby Texas Using Wind Dependent Whole-Air
Sampling
Order Number PB93-168821CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park
NC. Atmospheric Research and Exposure Assessment Lab •
P.3? ^*vnVi?nmental Tecnnol°gy. lnc- Research Triangle
Park, NC.'XonTech, Inc., Van Nuys, CA; 1993
Whole-air sampling was performed before and after the start-
up of the bioremediation of an industrial (primarily petro-
chemical) waste lagoon in Crosby Texas, near Houston Four
bector Samplers' were deployed at the four corners of the
French Limited Superfund Site. These samplers collect air
into one of two SUMMA polished canisters depending upon
wind direction and speed. When the wind blows at the sam-
pler from across the waste lagoon, air is routed to the 'IN'
sector canister, otherwise sample is collected in the 'OUT'
sector canister. As such, each sampler provides its own
background sample, and, upon gas chromatographic analy-
sis, individual compounds can be associated with the waste
lagoon. Five sets of 24-hour sector samples were taken- the
first set was collected prior to the start of the bioremediation
effort and the remaining four sets were taken sequentially for
four 24-hour periods after the start-up of the procedure.
Specifications: See also PB92-206432. Prepared in coop-
eration with ManTech Environmental Technology Inc Re-
searchJTriangle Park, NC. Sponsored by XonTech, Inc.,' Van
Subject index keywords: Volatile organic compounds Bio-
logical treatment, Remedial action, Superfund, Air pollution
sampling, Waste management.
1415 Options for Developing and Evaluating Mitigation
strategies for Indoor Air Impacts at CERCLA Sites Air/
Superfund National Technical Guidance Study Series
Report ASF-36 '
Order Number PB94-110517CDH, price: PC A08/MF A02
Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park
NC. Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards; Sep 93 '
The purpose of the document is to present and analyze ap-
proaches that may be used to mitigate the Comprehensive
^Z°^eo^' ResPonse> Compensation, and Liability Act of
1980 (CERCLA) site impacts on the indoor air quality of
nearby structures. The document is designed to provide in-
formation that may assist in resolution of indoor air quality
concerns at CERCLA sites. The procedures and methods
however, may also be useful in developing mitigation strate-
gies for indoor air impacts from other hazardous wastes and
hazardous materials sources. The document focuses primari-
ly on mitigation methods that may be applied in the immedi-
ate vicinity of the impacted or potentially impacted
structure(s). Reference is made to CERCLA site remediation
methods that may also have a beneficial impact on indoor air
quality, but these are not discussed in detail. The document
includes summary level information on technical methods to
prevent or reduce the intrusion of site related chemicals into
the indoor environment and institutional methods to restrict
the use of developed and undeveloped property to the
extent necessary to reduce risks to acceptable levels.
Specifications: See also PB93-122257. 167p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Indoor air pollution
Remedial action.
1416 Review and Evaluation of Area Source Dispersion
Algorithms for Emission Sources at Superfund Sites
Order Number PB90-142753CDH, price: PC A06/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park,
NC. Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards.; TRC
Environmental Consultants, Inc., East Hartford, CT; Nov 89
The report examines air quality dispersion modeling algo-
rithms and related technical issues associated with estimat-
ing ambient concentrations from area sources at Superfund
sites. The report describes the area source emission charac-
teristics associated with Superfund sites and provides a
review of existing, available techniques for modeling area
sources. It also describes the results of applying five short-
term and three long-term area source models to a number of
example applications and one field data base in order to
compare the magnitude of concentration predictions and test
whether concentration estimates are consistent with mathe-
matical and physical principles. The report provides conclu-
sions and recommendations.
Specifications: Prepared in cooperation with TRC Environ-
mental Consultants, Inc., East Hartford, CT. 124p.
Subject index keywords: Atmospheric diffusion, Hazardous
materials, Mathematical models, Air quality, Superfund pro-
gram, Environmental transport, Air pollution sampling.
1417 Sector Sampling for VOC's during Remediation of
Superfund Site at Shaver's Farm, Georgia
Order Number PB91-182840CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
ManTech Environmental Technology, Inc., Research Triangle
Park, NC.; Environmental Protection Agency, Research
Triangle Park, NC. Atmospheric Research and Exposure
Assessment Lab; 1991
The sector sampling approach for the determination of the
spatial contributions of volatile organic compounds to the
ambient air was employed at a Superfund site under remedi-
ation. Two canister based sampling systems were deployed
and whole air samples were collected at the Shaver's Farm
Superfund Site in northwest Georgia near Chattanooga, Ten-
nessee, while chemical waste drums were excavated and re-
packaged. The method is based upon the collection of a
constant stream of air into one of two SUMMA polished can-
isters depending on wind direction; when the wind comes to-
wards the sampler from the suspected emissions area,
sample is routed into the 'IN' sector canister, otherwise,
sample is collected in the 'OUT' sector canister. Upon analy-
sis, the comparison between the IN and OUT sample results
273
-------
TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION:
Bioremediation Technologies
indicates compounds that are emitted from the suspected
source area. Data from the week-long Shaver's Farm field
study are presented along, with a mathematical method for
Interpretation.
Specifications: Sponsored by Environmental Protection
Agency, Research Triangle Park, NC. Atmospheric Research
and Exposure Assessment Lab. 18p.
Subject index keywords: Air pollution sampling, Superfund,
Waste disposal, Waste storage, Volatile organic compounds,
Remedial action.
TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM
IMPLEMENTATION: Bioremediation
Technologies
1418 Alternative Biological Treatment Processes for
Remediation of Crepsote-and PCP-Contaminated
Materials: Bench-Scale Treatability Studies
Order Number PB91-179085CDH, price: PC A05/MF A01
Southern BioProducts, Inc., Pendleton, SC.; Technical
Resources, Inc., Gulf Breeze, FL.*Environmental Research
Lab., Gulf Breeze, FL; Mar 91
Bench-scale biotreatability studies were performed to deter-
mine the most effective of two bioremediation application
strategies to ameliorate creosote- and pentachlorophenol
(PCP)-contaminated soils present at the American Creosote
Wo/ks Superfund site, Pensacola, Florida: solid-phase biore-
meolation or slurry-phase bioremediation. When indigenous
microorganisms were employed as biocatalysts, solid-phase
bioremediation was slow and ineffective (8-12 weeks re-
quired to biodegrade >50% of resident organics). Biodegra-
dation was limited to lower-molecular-weight constituents
rather than the more hazardous, higher-molecular-weight
(HMW) compounds; PCP and HMW polycyclic aromatic hy-
drocarbons (PAHs) containing 4 or more fused rings resisted
biological attach. Moreover, supplementation with aqueous
solution of inorganic nutrients had little effect on the overall
effectiveness of the treatment strategy. Alternatively, slurry-
phase bioremediation was much more effective: >50% of
targeted organics were biodegraded in 14 days. Again, how-
ever, more persistent contaminants, such as PCP and HMW
PAHs, were not extensively degraded when subjected to the
action of indigenous microorganisms.
Specifications: Prepared in cooperation with Technical Re-
sources, Inc., Gulf Breeze, FL. Sponsored by Environmental
Research Lab., Gulf Breeze, FL. 97p.
Subject index keywords: Biological treatment, Remedial
action, Creosote, Superfund, Waste disposal, Phenol/pen-
tachloro.
1419 Bench-Scale Evaluation of Alternative Biological
Treatment Processes for the Remediation of
Pentachlorophenol- and Creosote-Contaminated
Materials: Slurry-Phase Bioremediation
Order Number PB92-129683CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Research Lab., Gulf Breeze, FL; c1991
Performance data on slurry-phase bioremediation of pentach-
lorophenol (PCP)- and creosote-contaminated sediment and
surface soil were generated at the bench-scale level. Aque-
ous slurries, containing 0.05% Triton X-100 to facilitate the
soil washing process and to help stabilize the suspensions,
were prepared from sediment and surface soil freshly ob-
tained from the American Creosote Works Superfund site at
Pensacola, Florida. Excluding PCP, benzo(b)fluoranthene,
benzo(k)-fluoranthene and indeno(123-cd)pyrene, slurry-
phase bioremediation of highly contaminated sediment (pH
adjusted) resulted in rapid and extensive biodegradation (3-5
days to biodegrade > 50% of targeted compounds) of moni-
tored constituents. Data suggest that slurry-phase bioreme-
diation strategies can be effectively employed to remediate
creosote-contaminated materials.
Specifications: Pub. in Environmental Science and Tech-
nology, v25 n6 p1055-1061 1991. See also PB91-179085.
9p.
Subject index keywords: Biological treatment, Remedial
action, Waste disposal, Creosote, Superfund, Phenol/pen-
tachloro.
1420 Bench-Scale Evaluation of Alternative Biological
Treatment Processes for the Remediation of
Pentachlorophenol- and Creosote-Contaminated
Materials: Solid-Phase Bioremediation
Order Number PB92-129725CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Research Lab., Gulf Breeze, FL; c1991
Bench-scale biotreatability studies were performed to evalu-
ate potential for a solid-phase bioremediation process to
ameliorate pentachlorophenol (PCP)- and creosote-contami-
nated sediment and surface soil at the American Creosote
Works Superfund site, Pensacola, Florida. Surface soil and
sediment were contaminated with approximately 1 and 7%
(weight basis) organic pollutants, respectively, but the more
recalcitrant creosote constituents (i.e., high-molecular-weight
polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons) were proportionately
higher in the surface soil indicative of creosote weathering.
Data suggest that full-scale site remediation employing solid-
phase bioremediation strategies may not effectively meet ac-
ceptable treatment standards in the time defining these stud-
ies.
Specifications: Pub. in Environmental Science and Tech-
nology, y25 n6 p1045-1055 1991. See also PB89-109920
and PB88-174446. 13p.
Subject index keywords: Biological treatment, Remedial
action, Creosote, Waste management, Phenol/pentachloro,
Superfund.
1421 Bioremediation: An Information Update on Applying
Bioremediation to Site Cleanup
Order Number PB93-126175CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Mar 92
The Bioremediation Field Initiative was established to provide
the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and State
Project Managers, consulting engineers, and industry with
timely information regarding new developments in the appli-
cation of bioremediation at hazardous waste sites. The initia-
tive provides evaluation of the performance of selected full-
scale field applications; provides technical assistance to Re-
medial Project Managers (RPMs) and On-Scene Coordina-
tors (OSCs), through the Technical Support Centers; and is
developing a data base on the field applications of bioreme-
diation, which is summarized in this bulletin.
Specifications: See also PB92-224708 and PB92-224807.
34p.
274
-------
TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION:
Bioremediation Technologies
t keywords: Biological treatment, Remedial
action Waste management, Hazardous materials, Cleanup
osr
1422 Bioremediation in the Field. An Information Update
on 'Applying Bioremediation to Site Clean-Up. Number 3
Order Number PB92-224807CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
cnr!??n,mental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
bond Waste and Emergency Response; Aug 91
not Blo[f mediation Fie|d Initiative was established to provide
lnrin«SP fh3!0 P,r°jef Mana9ers- consulting engineers and
industry with timely information regarding new developments
in the application of bioremediation at hazardous waste sites
The initiative will fully evaluate the performance of selected
DDM0 J'H aPP|icati°ns, provide technical assistance to
RPMs and OSCs, and develop a treatability database to be
available through the Alternative Treatment Technologies In-
ormation Center (ATTIC). Six sites have currently been se-
tected for field evaluation of bioremediation: Libby Superfund
?£L ftr M°ntana; Park City Pipeline Spill, Park City,
Kansas; Allied Signal Superfund Site, St. Joseph, Michigan
Eielson Air Force Base, Alaska; Hill Air Force Base, Utah:
and Brookhaven Superfund Site, Brookhaven, MS.
Specifications: 25p.
Subject index keywords: Biological treatment, Remedial
action Hazardous materials, Waste management, Cleanup
operations.
1423 Bioremediation in the Field: An Information Update
on Applying Bioremediation to Site Cleanup. (Number 4)
Order Number PB92-224708CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
bond waste and Emergency Response; Dec 91
Contents: Update on the Bioremediation Field Initiative; Bior-
emediation Being Evaluated at the Brookhaven Wood Pre-
serving Facility; Bioremediation Action Committee- 1991 Ac-
complishments; Interim Guidelines Issued for Preparing Bior-
emediation Spill Response Plans; FTTA Offers Opportunities
for Cooperative Biosystems R&D with EPA; 1991 Bioreme-
diation Field Projects; RREL Provides Technical Support for
Bioremediation of Superfund Sites; Bioremediation Field Initi-
ative Contacts; EPA Bioremediation Publications; EPA
Athens Lab and GLNPO Demonstrate Anaerobic Degrada-
tion of PCBs; Cleanup Information Bulletin Board; Field Appli-
cations of Bioremediation; Bioremediation Live Satellite Sem-
iri£ir.
Specifications: 29p.
Subject index keywords: Biological treatment, Remedial
action, Hazardous materials, Waste management, Bioreme-
diation, Cleanup.
14fo0oB'°remediation in tne Field: Number 1, November
1990
Order Number PB93-206340CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
!nr!f?n,mental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
bond Waste and Emergency Response; Nov 90
The Bioremediation Field Initiative is designed to provide
tPA and State project managers, consulting engineers, and
industry with timely information regarding new developments
in the application of bioremediation. These applications in-
clude the cleanup of abandoned waste sites, industrial facili-
ties, leaking underground storage tanks and ground water
™f /T,™°m th~Se S0urces- Tne Technology Innovation
Office (TIO), an office within the Office of Solid Waste and
Emergency Response (OSWER), in conjunction with the
Office of Research and Development's (ORD) Office of
Technology Transfer and Regulatory Support, will produce
the bulliten on a regular basis to serve as the principal infor-
mation transfer mechanism for the Bioremediation Field Initi-
ative.
Specifications: See also PB92-224708 and PB92-224807
18p.
Subject index keywords: Biological treatment, Remedial
action, Hazardous materials, Waste management.
1425 Bioremediation Resource Guide and Bioremediation
Resource Matrix
Order Number PB94-112307CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Sep 93
The Bioremediation Resource Guide is intended to support
decision-making by Regional and State Corrective Action
permit writers, Remedial Project Managers (RPMs), On-
Scene Coordinators, contractors, and other involved in evalu-
ating cleanup alternatives by directing readers to bioremedia-
tion resource documents, databases, hotlines, and dockets
as well as identifying regulatory mechanisms (e.g., Research
Development and Demonstration Permits) that have the po-
tential to ease the implementation of bioremediation at haz-
ardous waste sites. The Guide provides abstracts of repre-
sentative examples of over 80 bioremediation bibliographies,
guidance, workshop reports, overview documents, study/test
results, and test designs/protocols. The Bioremediation Re-
source Matrix, which accompanies the Guide, identifies the
technology, media, and contaminants covered in each ab-
stracted document. The included documents focus for the
most part on soil and ground water and on in-situ, slurry
phase, and land treatment bioremediation.
Specifications: 32p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste processing
Bioremediation.
1426 Pilot-Scale Demonstration of a Slurry-Phase
Biological Reactor for Creosote-Contaminated Soil.
Applications Analysis Report
Order Number PB94-124039CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
IT Corp., Cincinnati, OH.; Environmental Protection Agency,
Cincinnati, OH. Risk Reduction Engineering Lab; Jan 93
IT Corporation in conjunction with ECOVA Corporation
(ECOVA) evaluated ECOVA's slurry-phase bioremediation
technology under U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's
(EPA) Superfund Innovative Technology Evaluation (SITE)
program. The purpose of this report is to present information
from the SITE demonstration and from three case studies to
evaluate the technical and economic applicability of slurry-
phase bioremediation technology to the remediation of soil-
and sludge-bound hazardous contaminants.
Specifications: Sponsored by Environmental Protection
Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk Reduction Engineering Lab.
/op.
Subject index keywords: Soil treatment, Hazardous materi-
als, Superfund, Waste treatment, Creosote, Slurry bio-reac-
tors, Innovative treatment technologies.
275
-------
TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION:
Groundwater Technologies
1427 Respirometric Methods for Determination of
Blodegradablllty and Biodegradation Kinetics for
Hazardous Organic Pollutant Compounds
Order Number PB92-217108CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk
Reduction Engineering Lab.; Cincinnati Univ., OH. Dept. of
Chemical and Nuclear Engineering; 1992
The purpose of the study was to obtain information on bio-
logical treatafaility of the benzene, phenol, phthalate and
ketone organics and of the Superfund CERCLA organics
bearing wastes in wastewater treatment systems which will
support development of an EPA technical guidance docu-
ment oh the discharge of the above organics to POTWs. The
study was to generate basic information on the fate of
CERCLA leachate organics during on-site treatment and bio-
degradation and inhibition data for pollutants found in Super-
fund site wastewater that could be discharged to POTWs.
Resplrometric biodegradability, biokinetic and inhibition data
were generated for the selected RCRA benzene, phenolic,
phthalate and ketone compounds.
Specifications: Presented at the ACS Environmental Chem-
istry Division Symposium on Chemical and Biochemical De-
toxification of Hazardous Wastes II, Miami Beach, FL., Sep-
tember 10-15, 1989. Prepared in cooperation with Cincinnati
Univ., OH. Dept. of Chemical and Nuclear Engineering. 39p.
Subject Index keywords: Waste disposal, Biodeterioration,
Organic compounds, Kinetics, Sewage treatment, Biological
treatment, Electrolytic respirometry.
1428 Slurry Biodegradation
Order Number PB91-228049CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Science Applications International Corp., Cincinnati, OH.;
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 90
In a slurry biodegradation system, an aqueous slurry is cre-
ated by combining soil or sludge with water. This slurry is
then biodegraded aerobically using a self-contained reactor
or in a lined lagoon. Thus, slurry biodegradation can be com-
pated to an activated sludge process or an aerated lagoon,
depending on the case. There are two main objectives for
using the technology: to destroy the organic contaminant
and, equally important, to reduce the volume of contaminat-
ed material. Slurry biodegradation can be the sole treatment
technology in a complete cleanup system, or it can be used
in conjunction with other biological, chemical, and physical
treatment. It may be demonstrated in the Superfund Innova-
tive Technology Evaluation (SITE) program. Commercial-
scale units are in operation. Vendors should be contacted to
determine the availability of a unit for a particular site. The
bulletin provides information on the technology applicability,
the types of residuals produced, the latest performance data,
site requirements, the status of the technology, and sources
for further information.
Specifications: Sponsored by Environmental Protection
Agency, Washington, DC. Office of Emergency and Remedial
Response. 10p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Biodeterior-
ation, Waste treatment, Slurries, Soil treatment.
TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM
IMPLEMENTATION: Groundwater
Technologies
1429 Advanced Oxidation Technologies for the
Treatment of Contaminated Groundwater
Order Number PB94-137353CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk
Reduction Engineering Lab.; PRC Environmental
Management, Inc., Chicago, IL; 1994
The paper presents information on two pilot-field applications
of advanced oxidation technologies for contaminated ground-
water with organics. The Ultrox technology was demonstrat-
ed in 1989 with the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency s
Superfund Innovative Technology Evaluation (SITE) program
at the Lorentz Barrel and Drum (LB&D) site in San Jose
California. Peroxidation Systems technology was applied at
the Old O-Field site located within the Aberdeen Proving
Ground in Maryland. The information presented includes a
description of the technologies, factors affecting the technol-
ogies, and results from the two pilot-scale studies of the UV/
oxidation treatment system applications.
Specifications: Pub. in Chemical Oxidation - Technologies
for the Nineties, v2 p406-417. Prepared in cooperation with
PRC Environmental Management, Inc., Chicago, IL. 14p.
Subject index keywords: Ground water, Water pollution
control, Oxidation.
1430 Applicability of Land Disposal Restrictions to RCRA
and CERCLA Ground Water Treatment Reinjection
Superfund Management Review: Recommendation No.
26
Order Number PB91-921332CDH, price: PC A01/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; 27 Dec 89
The directive discusses whether or not ground water con-
taminated with restricted RCRA hazardous wastes, which is
extracted during RCRA corrective action or CERCLA re-
sponse action must meet the best demonstrated available
technology (BOAT) identified for that waste under the ROHA
land disposal restrictions (LDRs) prior to each remjection.
The directive explains EPA's interpretation of whether the
LDRs are applicable or (under CERCLA response actions
only) relevant and appropriate to such reinjections or to the
remediation as a whole.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $150 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $300). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 5p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
Hazardous materials, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
Response, Land Disposal Restrictions.
1431 Basic Concepts of Contaminant Sorption at
Hazardous Waste Sites (Ground Water Issue)
Order Number PB91-191007CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Robert S. Kerr Environmental Research Lab., Ada, OK; Oct
90
The Regional Superfund Ground Water Forum is a group of
ground-water scientists, representing EPA's Regional Super-
fund Offices, organized to exchange up-to-date information
276
-------
TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION:
Groundwater Technologies
related to ground-water remediation of Superfund sites One
of the major .ssues of concern to the Forum is the transport
and fate of contaminants in soil and ground water as related
to subsurface remediation. Processes which influence the
behavior of contaminants in the subsurface must be consid-
ered both in evaluating the potential for movement as well as
m designing remediation activities at hazardous waste sites
buch factors not only tend to regulate the mobility of con-
taminants, but also their form and stability. Sorption is often
the paramount process controlling the behavior of contami-
nants in the subsurface. The paper summarizes the basic
concepts of sorption in soil and ground water with emphasis
on nonpolar organic contaminants.
Specifications: 9p.
Subject index keywords: Ground water, Hazardous materi-
als Sorption, Superfund, Remedial action, Waste disposal
Water pollution control.
1432 Biodegradation of Creosote and Pentachlorophenol
in Contaminated Groundwater: Chemical and Bioloqical
Assessment
Order Number PB92-129659CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Research Lab., Gulf Breeze, FL; Southern
BioProducts, Inc., Pendleton, SC; c1991
Shake flask studies examined the rate and extent of biode-
gradation of pentachlorophenol (POP) and 42 components of
coal-tar creosote present in contaminated groundwater re-
covered from the American Creosote Works Superfund site
Pensacola, Fla. The ability of indigenous soil microorganisms
to remove these contaminants from aqueous solutions was
determined by gas chromatographic analysis of organic ex-
tracts of biotreated groundwater. Changes in potential envi-
ronmental and human health hazards associated with the
biodegradation of the material were determined at intervals
by Microtox assays and fish toxicity and teratogenicity tests
After 14 days of incubation at 30 C, indigenous microorga-
nisms effectively removed 100, 99, 94, 88, and 87% of
measured phenolic and lower-molecular-weight polycyclic ar-
omatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) and S-heterocyclic, N-heterocy-
clic, and O-heterocyclic constituents of creosote, respective-
ly. However, only 53% of the higher-molecular-weight PAHs
were degraded; PGP was not removed. Despite the removal
of a majority of the organic contaminants through biotreat-
ment, only a slight decrease in the toxicity and teratogenicity
of biotreated groundwater was observed. Data suggest that
toxicity and teratogenicity are associated with compounds
difficult to treat biologically and that one may not necessarily
rely on indigenous microorganisms to effectively remove
these compounds in a reasonable time span; to this end al-
ternative or supplemental approaches may be necessary
Similar measures of the toxicity and teratogenicity of treated
material may offer a simple, yet important, guide to bioreme-
diation effectiveness. (Copyright (c) 1991, American Society
for Microbiology.)
Specifications: Pub. in Applied and Environmental Microbi-
ology, v57 n5 P1277-1285 May 91. See also PB90-129552
Prepared in cooperation with Southern BioProducts Inc
Pendleton, SC. 11 p. ' '
Subject index keywords: Biodeterioration, Water pollution
control, Biological treatment, Hazardous materials, Ground
water, Creosote, Phenol/pentachloro
1433 Biological Treatment of Wood Preserving Site
Groundwater by BioTrol, Inc. Applications Analysis
Report
Order Number PB91-227983CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Science Applications International Corp., Paramus, NJ.;
Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk
Reduction Engineering Lab; Sep 91
The report is an evaluation of the BioTrol, Inc. Aqueous
Treatment System (BATS), a fixed-film, aerobic biological
treatment process for contaminated groundwaters and other
wastewaters. It summarizes and analyzes the results of the
Superfund Innovative Technology Evaluation (SITE) Pro-
gram's six week demonstration at the MacGillis and Gibbs
Company wood preserving site in New Brighton, MN. The
conclusions from the pilot scale demonstration study and
other available data are: (1) the fixed film aerobic process is
capable of degrading pentachlorophenol (PGP) and other or-
ganic pollutants to more than 95% removal.
Specifications: See also PB92-110048. Sponsored by Envi-
ronmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk Reduction
Engineering Lab. 51 p.
Subject index keywords: Wood preservatives, Waste treat-
ment.
1434 Chemical Enhancements to Pump-and-Treat
Remediation. Ground Water Issue
Order Number PB92-180074CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response. Oregon Graduate Inst.
of Science and Technology, Beaverton. Dept. of
Environmental Science and Engineering; Jan 92
Conventional pump-and-treat technologies are among the
most widely used systems for the remediation of contaminat-
ed ground-water. Within recent years it has become recog-
nized that these systems can require protracted periods of
time to make significant reductions in the quantity of con-
taminants associated with both the liquid and solid phases
which constitute the subsurface matrix. Evaluating the effec-
tiveness of pump-and-treat remediations at Superfund sites,
as well as attempting to improve this effectiveness, are
issues identified by the Regional Superfund Ground Water
Forum as a concern of Superfund decision makers. The
Forum is a group of ground-water scientists and engineers
representing EPA's Regional Superfund Offices, organized to
exchange the most recent information related to ground-
water remediation at Superfund sites. Recent research has
led to a better understanding of the processes involved in
the transport and transformation of contaminants in the sub-
surface. While some of these processes are not readily ame-
nable to enhance removal by ground-water extraction, others
suggest that there are available techniques to increase the
efficiency of these types of remediation systems. The intent
of the document is to explore the use of chemical enhance-
ment to improve ground-water remediation efficiencies using
pump-and-treat technologies, and point out arenas of con-
tamination where such techniques are not practical.
Specifications: See also PB86-122561, PB87-169090
PB90-274549 and PB92-114461. Prepared in cooperation
with Oregon Graduate Inst. of Science and Technology, Bea-
verton. Dept. of Environmental Science and Engineering.
Subject index keywords: Ground water, Water pollution
control, Remedial action, Superfund.
277
-------
TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION:
Groundwater Technologies
1435 Compendium of Federal Financial Assistance
Programs: Targeting Programs for State and Local
Ground-Water Protection
Order Number PB93-116069CDH, price: PC A06/MF A02
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Ground-Water Protection; Sep 90
Contents; Agricultural Conservation; Agricultural Education/
Technical Assistance; Agricultural Pollution Control; Agricul-
tural Research; Community Development; Drinking Water
Protection; Emergency Water Assistance; Environmental Pro-
tection; Farm Ownership Credit; Hazardous Waste Manage-
ment; Pesticides Control; Rural Development; Solid Waste
Management; Superfund; Toxic Substances; Underground
Storage Tanks; Water Pollution Control; and Water Re-
sources Development.
Specifications: 102p.
Subject Index keywords: Ground water, Economic assist-
ance, Project management, Water pollution control, Drinking
water,
1436 Considerations in Ground Water Remediation at
Superfund Sites
Order Number PB91-238584CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; 18 Oct 89
The directive transmits findings from a study of several sites
where ground water extraction is being conducted to contain
or reduce levels of contaminants in the ground water. The
memorandum also presents several recommendations for
modifying the Superfund approach to ground water remedi-
ation.
Specifications: 10p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Hazardous materials,
Waste management, Water pollution control, Office of Solid
Waste and Emergency Response.
•1437 Considerations in Ground-Water Remediation at
Superfund Sites and RCRA Facilities: Update
Order Number PB92-963358CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; 27 May 92
The updated directive clarifies and expands OSWER's gener-
al policy concerning remediation of contaminated ground
water, especially with regard to nonaqueous phase liquid
(NAPL) contaminants. The document promotes a consistent
and sound approach to ground water remediation at both Su-
perfund sites and RCRA facilities and reinforces OSWER's
commitment to clean up ground water contamination at
these sites.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 13p.
Subject Index keywords: Ground water, Pollution control,
Government policies, Superfund, Remedial action.
1438 Detoxification of PentachJorophenol and Creosote
Contaminated Groundwater by Physical Extraction:
Chemical and Biological Assessment
Order Number PB92-129733CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Research Lab., Gulf Breeze, FL; c1991
Chemical analyses revealed that polycyclic aromatic hydro-
carbons (PAH's) and other organic compounds were present
In a perennial freshwater stream that flowed through the
abandoned American Creosote Works, designated for Super-
fund cleanup by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.
A study was conducted to determine efficacy of ultrafiltration
for removal of these organics from groundwater at the Su-
perfund site. Ultrafiltration reduced the concentration of total
identified organics from 210.0 mg/L in groundwater to 1.5
mg/L in the post-filtration permeate. Tests for toxicity/terato-
genicity in embryonic inland silversides, Menidia beryllina;
and Microtox were conducted with: streamwater, untreated
groundwater, feedwater used in the ultrafiltration system and
permeate water that passed through the ultrafiltration
system. A concentration of 100% streamwater caused signif-
icant (alpha < or = 0.05) teratogenic responses in fish em-
bryos and larvae. Groundwater and feedwater caused signifi-
cant embryo toxic or teratogenic responses at concentrations
of 100 10 and 1%; Microtox ECSO's were 0.85 and 0.48/o,
respectively. In contrast, only 100% permeate water caused
significant increases in terata.
Specifications: Pub. in Archives Environmental Contamina-
tion and Toxicology, v21 P233-244 1991. See also PB87-
174934 and PB86-208543. 9p.
Subject index keywords: Water pollution control, Creosote,
Ground water, Phenol/pentachloro, Water pollution effects,
Superfund.
1439 Emerging Technologies: Bio-Recovery Systems
Removal and Recovery of Metal Ions from Groundwater
Order Number PB90-252594CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
Bio-Recovery Systems, Inc., LasCruces, NM.; Environmental
Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk Reduction
Engineering Lab; Aug 90
A series of laboratory tests and an on-site pilot scale demon-
stration of Bio-Recovery Systems' AlgaSORB technology for
the removal and recovery of mercury-contaminated ground-
water were conducted under the SITE program. Optimum
conditions were determined for mercury binding to Alga-
SORB Conditions under which mercury could be stripped
from AlgaSORB were developed. On-site, pilot scale demon-
strations with a portable waste treatment system incorporat-
ing columns containing two different AlgaSORB preparations
confirmed laboratory tests. Over 500 bed volumes of mercu-
ry-contaminated groundwater could be successfully treated
before regeneration of the system was required. Mercury was
removed to levels below the discharge limit of 10 micro-
gram/L.
Specifications: See also Appendices, PB90-252602. Spon-
sored by Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH.
Risk Reduction Engineering Lab. 55p.
Subject index keywords: Mercury(Metal), Water pollution
control, Ground water, Superfund, Biological recovery.
1440 Emerging Technologies: Bio-Recovery Systems
Removal and Recovery of Metal Ions from Groundwater.
AppondiCGS
Order Number PB90-252602CDH, price: PC A06/MF A01
Bio-Recovery Systems, lnc:, LasCruces, NM.; Environmental
Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk Reduction
Engineering Lab; Aug 90
Now in its fourth year, the Superfund Innovative Technology
Evaluation (SITE) Program is part of EPA's research into
cleanup methods for hazardous waste sites around the
nation. Through cooperative agreements with developers, al-
ternative or innovative technologies are refined at the bench-
278
-------
HVe' Td then demonstrated at actual sites.
each tp"d eva|uates extensive performance data on
h^r,£n f t0 "** In remedjation decision-making for
hazardous waste sites. The appendices include the laborato-
IrP n^ TU'r! fr°m two '"^Pendent laboratories that
were provided split samples from Bio-Recovery Systems Inc
during the on-site pilot testing of Bio-Recoverys techndogy f
trhemSH°f fmMrCUry,fr°m c<»nated groundwaters
the period of November 7, 1989 to December 1 1989
a'SO PB9°-252594. Sponsored by
^^ °H' R'S
™ "de>:, keywords: Mercury(Metal), Water pollution
control, Ground water, Superfund, Biological recovery
1441 EPA Site Demonstration of BioTrol Aqueous
Treatment System
?rten^Tbf P+B91-182279CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Science Applications International Corp., Paramus NJ •
cSa?hASMkapM,NoEnvir°nmental Pr°te*ion Agency,
Cincinnati, OH. Risk Reduction Engineering Lab- c1991
BioTrors pilot scale, fixed-film biological system was evaluat-
ed, under the EPA's SITE program, for its effectiveness at
SoVr?9wLentaCrfhIOrOPHhen°l fr°m g^ndwaterSe demon-
stration was performed in the summer of 1989 at a wood
Preserving site in New Brighton, Minnesota. The system em
ploys indigenous microorganisms amended with a specific
WPH nn t°h0phfn0|-de?rading bacte™™- Groundwater from a
weH on the s.te was fed to the system at 1, 3, and 5 qpm
with no pretreatment other than pH adjustment, nutrient addT-
ninft fmperature control. Each flowrate was maintained
for abou two weeks while samples were collected for exten
f T't(!he SyStem W3S ^Pable of elimlnat-
nt of the Pentachiorophenol in the ground-
t pr°duf'ng effluent with Pentachlorophenol concen-
to about 1 ppm. At the lower flows (1 and 3 gpm)
ornnho T ***** ^^ " P6rCent> and effluent PerS
lorophenol concentrations were well below 05 ppm The
K?h~» «Stent!y prSdU°ed a comP'etely nontoxic effluent
T-n? L2• t T?^ Review of other data Provided by Bio-
T.ol indicates that the process is also effective on other hy-
drocarbons, mcluding solvents and fuels. The system ap-
t^mfn !°^ a ?omPact and cost-effective treatment for con-
once 2SiZHW?nerS reT™9 minimal °Peratin9 atten*on
mem AssSS./00^19111 (C) 1"1"Air & WaSte Ma™^
Specifications: Pub. in Jnl. of the Air Pollution Control As-
sociation v41 n2 P228-233 Feb 91. Prepared in cooperation
with BioTrol, Chaska, MN. Sponsored bj' Environmental Pro-
LabI. 9np 9enCy> Cincinnati' OH- R|sk Reduction Engineering
S^oV"?6n keywords: Biological treatment, Water pollu-
ton control, Ground water, Waste disposal, BioTrol aqueous
Sn Program ' ^^ 'nn°VatiVe Technol°9y EvaS-
1442 Estimating Potential for Occurrence of DNAPL at
ouperfund Sites
Order Number PB92-963338CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Jan 92
The presence of Dense Nonaqueous Phase Liquids (DNAPL)
n soi s and aquifers can control the ultimate success or fail-
ure of remediation at a hazardous waste site. Because of the
TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION:
Groundwater Technologies
complex nature of DNAPL transport and fate, however
DNAPL may often be undetected by direct methods, leading
to incomplete site assessments and inadequate remedial de-
signs. Sites affected by DNAPL may require a different con-
ceptual framework to develop effective characterization and
remedial actions. To help site personnel determine if DNAPL-
based characterization strategies should be employed at a
particular site, a guide for estimating the potential for DNAPL
occurrence was developed. The approach, which uses histor-
ical site use information and site characterization data is de-
scribed in the fact sheet.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S Canada
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 11 p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Pollution
control, Superfund, Dense nonaqueous phase liquids.
1443 Evaluating the Effectiveness of Ground Water
Extraction Systems
Order Number PB91-177386CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Robert S. Kerr Environmental Research Lab Ada OK •
CH2M/HHI, Reston, VA; C1991
The most common process for remediating contaminated
ground water is extraction and treatment. Data from 19 on-
going and completed ground water extraction systems were
collected and analyzed to evaluate the effectiveness of this
process in achieving cleanup concentration goals for ground
water. This analysis indicated several trends including: con-
tainment of ground water plumes was usually achieved; con-
taminant concentrations dropped significantly initially fol-
lowed by a leveling out; after the period of initial rapid de-
cline, the continued decreases in concentration were usually
slower than anticipated; and certain data important to opti-
mizing system design and operation had often not been col-
lected during the site characterization phase. Factors limiting
the achievement of cleanup concentration goals fell into four
basic categories: hydrogeological factors; contaminant-relat-
ed factors; continued migration from source areas and the
size of the plume itself; and system design factors. The find-
ings of the study indicate that ground water extraction is an
effective method for preventing additional migration of con-
taminant plumes and achieving risk reduction. However the
findings indicate that in many situations, it may not be practi-
cable to rely solely on ground water extraction and treatment
to achieve health-based cleanup concentrations throughout
the contaminated zone and fulfill the primary goal of return-
ing ground water to beneficial use. This suggests several
recommendations for improving ground water response ac-
tions including: actions to contain contaminant plumes
should be initiated early; data on vertical variation of hydrau-
lic conductivity, distribution of the contaminant mass, and
partitioning of contaminants to soil or a stationary phase in
the saturated zone should generally be collected as part of
the site characterization process; remedial actions should be
implemented in stages to better utilize information on aquifer
response as the system is being designed and implemented-
remedial actions should be monitored and modified during
operation to optimize system efficiency; and methods to en-
hance extraction effectiveness and efficiency should be con-
sidered.
279
-------
TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION:
Groundwater Technologies
Specifications: Pub. in Ground Water Monitoring Review,
v11 n1 p119-124, Winter 1991. Sponsored by CH2M/Hill,
Reston, VA. 8p.
Subject Index keywords: Water pollution control, Ground
water, Extraction, Cleanup operations.
1444 Evaluation of Ground-Water Extraction Remedies:
Phase 2. Volume "f. Summary Report
Order Number PB92-963346CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Feb 92
The report is the second phase of a study to evaluate the
effectiveness of ground-water extraction systems being used
to remediate ground-water contamination at hazardous waste
sites. The report was prepared in two volumes. Volume 1
contains an executive summary and chapters which discuss
the purpose, methodologies, and conclusion of the project.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. Supersedes PB90-183583. See
also PB92-963347. 38p.
Subject Index keywords: Ground water, Hazardous materi-
als, Remedial action, Water pollution control, Extraction,
Cleanup operations.
1445 Evaluation of Ground-Water Extraction Remedies:
Phase 2. Volume 2. Case Studies and Updates
Order Number PB92-963347CDH, price: PC A19/MF A04
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Feb 92
The report is the second phase of a study to evaluate the
effectiveness of ground-water extraction systems being used
to remediate ground-water contamination at hazardous waste
sites. The report was prepared in two volumes. Volume 2 dis-
cusses the case studies-individual analyses of each of the
24 sites associated with the project.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. Supersedes PB90-274440. See
also PB92-963346. 450p.
Subject Index keywords: Ground water, Hazardous materi-
als, Remedial action, Water pollution control, Extraction,
Cleanup operations.
1446 Evaluation of Ground-Water Extraction Remedies.
Volume 2. Case Studies 1-19
Order Number PB90-274440CDH, price: PC A19
CH2M Hill Southeast, inc., Reston, VA.; Environmental
Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of Emergency
arid Remedial Response; Oct 89
The volume was prepared as part of an evaluation of
ground-water extraction remedies completed under EPA
Contract No. 68-W8-0098. It presents 19 case studies of in-
dividual sites where ground-water extraction systems have
been implemented. The case studies present site character-
istics and discuss factors that have influenced the success
of the remedial activities.
Specifications: See also PB90-183583 and Volume 3,
PB90-274457. Portions of this document are not fully legible.
Sponsored by Environmental Protection Agency, Washington,
DC. Office of Emergency and Remedial Response. 599p.
Subject index keywords: Ground water, Hazardous materi-
als, United States, Extraction, Waste treatment, Superfund.
1447 Evaluation of Ground-Water Extraction Remedies.
Volume 3. General Site Data: Data Base Reports
Order Number PB90-274457CDH, price: PC A06/MF A01
CH2M Hill Southeast, Inc., Reston, VA.; Environmental
Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of Emergency
and Remedial Response; Oct 89
The volume is the third of a three-volume report document-
ing the results of an evaluation of ground-water extraction
remedies at hazardous waste sites. It consists of a collection
of 112 data base reports presenting general information on
sites where ground-water extraction systems are in various
stages of planning or implementation.
Specifications: See also Volume 2, PB90-274440 Spon-
sored by Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DO.
Office of Emergency and Remedial Response. 121 p.
Subject index keywords: Ground water, Hazardous materi-
als, Extraction, Water pollution control, Superfund.
1448 Evaluation of the Likelihood of DNAPL Presence at
NPL Sites: National Results
Order Number PB93-963343CDH, price: PC A06/MF A02
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Sep 93
The document presents the results of a survey undertaken
by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's (EPAs)
Office of Emergency and Remedial Response (Superfund).
The survey was designed to estimate the proportion of Na-
tional Priorities List (NPL) sites where Dense Nonaqueous
Phase Liquids (DNAPLs) may be present. Earlier studies by
OERR suggested that DNAPLs may be more common at
hazardous waste sites than previously thought, and may act
as a continuing source of contamination thus reducing the
ability of pump-and-treat systems to attain cleanup goals
within expected timeframes (Evaluation of Ground Water Ex-
traction Remedies, Phase II, EPA 9355.4-05). The study rep-
resents the first systematic nation-wide review of NPL sites
designed to estimate the extent of subsurface DNAPL con-
tamination.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 119p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Hazardous materials,
Liquid wastes.
1449 Evaluation of Unsaturated/Valdose Zone Models for
Superfund Sites .„„„„,- Ano
Order Number PB94-157765CDH, price: PC A09/MF A03
Oklahoma Agricultural Experiment Station, Stillwater.; Robert
S. Kerr Environmental Research Lab., Ada, OK; Mar 94
Mathematical models of water and chemical movement in
soils are being used as decision aids for defining ground-
water protection practices for Superfund sites. Numerous
transport models exist for predicting movement and degrada-
tion of hazardous chemical through soils. Many of these re-
quire extensive input parameters which include uncertainty
due to soil variability and unknown future weather. The
impact of uncertain model parameters upon the model output
is not known. Model users need an understanding of this
impact so they can measure the appropriate parameters for
280
i, ,',lli:,,.i,iii, < It1 iliiU'l1
-------
TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION:
Groundwater Technologies
the site and incorporate the model prediction uncertainty into
their decisions. The report summarizes research findings
which address the sensitivity and uncertainty of model output
due to uncertain input parameters. The objective of the re-
search was to determine the sensitivity and uncertainty of
travel time, concentration, mass loading and pulse width of
contaminants at the water table due to uncertainty in soil
properties such as organic carbon content, bulk density,
water content, and hydraulic conductivity. Chemical proper-
ties, such as organic carbon partition coefficient and degra-
dation half-life, were also examined. The four models select-
ed for this analysis were RITZ, VIP, CMLS and HYDRUS.
Specifications: See also PB94-157773. Sponsored by
Robert S. Kerr Environmental Research Lab., Ada, OK. 197p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Water flow,
Sediment transport, Ground water, Superfund.
1450 Extraction of Mercury from Groundwater Using
Immobilized Algae
Order Number PB92-121367CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk
Reduction Engineering Lab; c1991
Bio-recovery Systems Inc., conducted a project under the
Emerging Technology portion of the United States Environ-
mental Protection Agency's (EPAs) Superfund Innovative
Technology Evaluation (SITE) Program to evaluate the ability
of immobilized algae to absorb mercury from contaminated
groundwater in laboratory studies and pilot-scale field tests.
Algae biomass was incorporated in a permeable polymeric
matrix. The product, AlgaSORB, packed into absorption col-
umns^ exhibited excellent flow characteristics, and functioned
as a 'biological' ion exchange resin. A sequence of eleven
laboratory tests demonstrated the ability of the product to
absorb mercury from groundwater that contained high levels
of total dissolved solids and hard water components. Howev-
er, use of a single AlgaSORB preparation yielded non-repeat-
able results with samples collected at different times of the
year. The strategy of extracting the groundwater through two
columns containing different times of the year. The strategy
of extracting the groundwater through two columns contain-
ing different preparations of AlgaSORB was developed and
proved successful in laboratory and pilot-scale field tests.
Field test results indicate that AlgaSORB could be economi-
cally competitive with ion exchange resins for removal of
mercury, with the advantage that hardness and other dis-
solved solids do not appear to compete with heavy metals
for binding capacity. (Copyright (c) 1991-Air and Waste Man-
agement Association.)
Specifications: Pub. in Jnl. of Air and Waste Management
Association, v41 n10 p1387-1393 Oct 91. 9p.
Subject index keywords: Water pollution control
Mercury(Metal), Biological treatment, Algae,
Absorption(Biology), Ground water, AlgaSORB.
1451 Facilitated Transport. Series of Issue Papers (3rd)
Order Number PB91-133256CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Robert S. Kerr Environmental Research Lab., Ada, OK; Aug
89
Facilitated transport is an issue identified by the Regional Su-
perfund Ground-Water Forum as a concern of Superfund de-
cision-makers. The issue paper presents the various facilitat-
ed transport mechanisms that have been verified in laborato-
ry experiments. Additionally, the practical considerations con-
cerning the potential role of facilitated transport at Superfund
sites are presented.
Specifications: 7p.
Subject index keywords: Ground water, Hazardous materi-
als, Water pollution, Superfund, Environmental transport.
1452 Field Demonstration of the UV/Oxidation
Technology to Treat Ground Water Contaminated with
VOCs
Order Number PB91-163741CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk
Reduction Engineering Lab.; PRC Environmental
Management, Inc., Chicago, IL; c1990
The paper presents the field evaluation results of the ultra-
violet radiation (UV)/oxidation technology developed by
Ultrox International, Santa Ana, California. The field evalua-
tion was performed at the Lorentz Barrel & Drum (LB&D) site
in San Jose, California under the Superfund Innovative Tech-
nology Evaluation program in February and March of 1989.
The UV/oxidation technology uses UV radiation, ozone, and
hydrogen peroxide to oxidize organic contaminants in water.
At the LB&D site, this technology was evaluated in treating
ground water contaminated with volatile organic compounds
(VOCs). The Ultrox system achieved VOC removals greater
than 90 percent. Most VOCs were removed through chemical
oxidation. However, for a few VOCs, such as 1,1,1-trichlor-
oethane and 1,1-dichloroethane, stripping also contributed
toward removal. The treated ground water met the applicable
discharge standards for discharge into a local waterway at
95 percent confidence level. There were no harmful air emis-
sions to the atmosphere from the Ultrox system, which is
equipped with an off-gas treatment unit. (Copyright (c) 1990--
Air & Waste Management Association.)
Specifications: Pub. in Jnl. of the Air and Waste Manage-
ment Association, v40 n4, Apr 90. Prepared in cooperation
with PRC Environmental Management, Inc., Chicago, IL. 10p.
Subject index keywords: Water pollution control, Volatile
organic compounds, Ground water, Ultraviolet radiation, Oxi-
dation, Ultrox system.
1453 Field Evaluation of the UV/Oxidation Technology to
Treat Contaminated Groundwater. Proceedings of the
National Conference (10th). Held in Washington, DC. on
November 27-29, 1989
Order Number PB90-221672CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk
Reduction Engineering Lab.; PRC Engineering, Inc., Chicago,
IL;c1990
The paper presents the field evaluation results of the ultra-
violet radiation (UV)Xoxidation technology developed by
Ultrox International, Santa Ana, California. The field evalua-
tion of the technology was performed at the Lorentz Barrel
and Drum (LB and D) site in San Jose, California, under the
Superfund Innovative Technology Evaluation (SITE) program
from February 27 through March 10, 1989. The UV/oxidation
technology uses UV radiation, ozone, and hydrogen peroxide
to oxidize organic contaminants present in water. At the LB
and D site, this technology was evaluated in treating ground
water contaminated with volatile organic compounds (VOCs).
The Ultrox system achieved VOC removals greater than 90
percent. The majority of VOCs were removed through chemi-
cal oxidation. The treated ground water met the applicable
discharge standards (NPDES) for disposal into Coyote Creek
281
-------
TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION:
Groundwater Technologies
at 90 percent confidence level. There were no harmful air
emissions from the Ultrox system into the atmosphere.
Specifications: Prepared in cooperation with PRC Engineer-
ing, Inc., Chicago, IL 10p.
Subject Index keywords: Ground water, Hazardous materi-
als, Water treatment.
1454 Filtration of Ground Water Samples for Metals
Analysis
Order Number PB90-185182CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Robert S. Kerr Environmental Research Lab., Ada, OK.;
Illinois State Water Survey Div., Champaign. Aquatic
Chemistry Section; c1989
The filtration of a ground water samples with 0.45 microme-
ter filters for determination of 'dissolved' metals is not only
Inaccurate for distinguishing between dissolved and particu-
late phases, but if used for estimates of mobile contaminant
loading in a given aquifer, may result in significant underesti-
matfons.
Specifications: Pub. in Hazardous Waste and Hazardous
Materials, v6 n4 p385-393 Nov 89. Prepared in cooperation
with Illinois State Water Survey Div., Champaign. Aquatic
Chemistry Section. 11 p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Filtration,
Water analysis, Ground water, Metals, Waste disposal, Water
pollution sampling, Water pollution detection.
1455 Ground-Water Issue: Characterizing Soils for
Hazardous Waste Site Assessments
Order Number PB91-921294CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Mar 91
The Regional Superfund Ground Water Forum is a group of
ground-water scientists representing EPA's Regional Offices,
organized to exchange up-to-date information related to
ground-water remediation at hazardous waste sites. Soil
characterization at hazardous waste sites is an issue identi-
fied by the forum" as a concern of CERCLA decision-makers.
Soil characterization provides data types required for deci-
sionmaking in three distinct RI/FS tasks: (1) Determination
of the nature and extent of soil contamination. (2) Risk as-
sessment, and determination of risk-based soil clean-up
levels. (3) Determination of the potential effectiveness of soil
remediation alternatives.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 17p.
Subject index keywords: Ground water, Soil classification,
Hazardous materials, Superfund.
1456 Ground-Water Issue: Potential Sources of Error in
Ground-Wafer Sampling at Hazardous Waste Sites
Order Number PB§4-12i688CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Nevada Univ. System, Las Vegas. Desert Research Inst;
Environmental Monitoring Systems Lab., Las Vegas, NV; Aug
92
The paper is intended to familiarize RPMs, OSCs, and field
personnel with the sources of error inherent to ground-water
sampling, and the relative impact of these errors on sample
representativeness. Elements of typical sampling protocol
will be discussed in relation to how these sources of error
can be identified and minimized. Some of the elements of
sampling protocol to be addressed include monitoring well
drilling, design, construction, and purging, sample collection
methods and devices, sample filtration, equipment decon-
tamination, sample transport and storage, and analytical
methods.
Specifications: See also PB91-181776. Sponsored by Envi-
ronmental Monitoring Systems Lab., Las Vegas, NV. 29p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Water pollution sam-
pling, Ground water.
1457 Ground-Water Issue: The Effects of Well Casing
Material on Ground Water-Quality
Order Number PB92-224724CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response. Army Engineer
Waterways Experiment Station, Vicksburg, MS. Geotechnical
Lab; Oct 91
The Regional Superfund Ground Water Forum is a group of
ground-water scientists representing U.S. Environmental Pro-
tection Agency's (U.S. EPA's) Regional Offices, organized to
exchange up-to-date information related to ground-water re-
mediation at hazardous waste sites. Well casing materials
used at hazardous waste sites is an issue identified by the
forum as a concern of CERCLA decision makers. All aspects
of a ground-water sampling program have the potential to
affect the composition of a ground-water sample. The high
degree of accuracy (parts per billion (ppb) range) required of
some chemical analysis dictates that all potential sources of
error of a ground-water sampling program be identified and
sources of error in such aspects be minimized. Selection of
the proper casing material for monitoring wells has been a
subject of much controversy since the publication of the U.S.
Specifications: Prepared in cooperation with Army Engineer
Waterways Experiment Station, Vicksburg, MS. Geotechnical
Lab. 17p.
Subject index keywords: Coverings, Water wells, Water
pollution, Superfund.
1458 Ground-Water Modeling Compendium. Model Fact
Sheets, Descriptions, Applications and Assessment
Framework
Order Number PB93-207504CDH, price: PC A08/MF A02
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response.; Wisconsin Univ.-
Madison.**lnternational Ground Water Modeling Center,
Indianapolis, IN; Oct 92
Models can be used to guide and complement field investi-
gations, thereby improving the understanding of the conse-
quences of site-specific hydrogeologic conditions. However,
models should not be used in lieu of field investigations and
care must be taken to ensure that models are not misused.
The intention of the Compendium is to: promote the appro-
priate use of models by increasing users' awareness about
the strengths, weaknesses and inherent uncertainties associ-
ated with ground-water models and modeling in general; and
support model users and decision-makers by providing a
convenient source of information on how to oversee model-
ing projects, how certain models have been applied in the
context of hazardous waste/Superfund programs, and the
characteristics of four specific ground-water models.
Specifications: Prepared in cooperation with Wisconsin
Univ.-Madison, and International Ground Water Modeling
Center, Indianapolis, IN. 157p.
282
-------
TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION:
Groundwater Technologies
Subject index keywords: Ground water movement, Path of
pollutants, Model studies.
1459 Ground Water Sampling for Metals Analyses.
Superfund Ground Water Issue
Order Number PB91-133249CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Mar 89
Filtration of ground-water samples for metals analysis is an
issue identified by the Regional Superfund Ground Water
Forum as a concern of Superfund decision-makers.
RSKERL-Ada and EMSL-Las Vegas convened a technical
committee of experts in the areas of ground-water geochem-
istry, inorganic chemistry, colloidal transport and ground-
water sampling technology to examine the issue and provide
technical guidance based on current scientific information.
The findings and recommendations of the committee were
that use of a 0.45 micron filter was not useful, appropriate or
reproducible in providing information on metals mobility in
ground-water systems, nor was it appropriate for determina-
tion of truly 'dissolved' constituents in ground water. A dual
sampling approach was recommended, with collection of
both filtered and unfiltered samples. This means that added
emphasis is placed on appropriate well construction meth-
ods, materials and ground-water sampling procedures.
Specifications: 8p.
Subject index keywords: Ground water, Hazardous materi-
als, Water pollution, Superfund.
1460 Guidance for Evaluating the Technical
Impracticability of Ground-Water Restoration
Order Number PB93-963507CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Sep 93
The document outlines EPA's approach to evaluating the
technical impracticability of attaining requiredground-water
cleanup levels and establishing alternative, protective reme-
dial strategies where restoration is determined to be techni-
cally impracticable.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 30p.
Subject index keywords: Ground water, Water pollution
control, Feasibility.
1461 Guide on Remedial Actions for Contaminated
Ground Water
Order Number PB90-272576CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Apr 89
The fact sheet summarizes the key issues in the develop-
ment, evaluation, and selection of ground water Remedial
Actions at Superfund sites, including CERCLA requirements,
project planning, and remedial action objectives as presented
in the comprehensive guidance.
Specifications: 9p.
Subject index keywords: Ground water, Water pollution,
Superfund, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response.
1462 Guide to Pump and Treat Groundwater Remediation
Technology
Order Number PB91-921356CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Nov 90
The fact sheet summarizes how to use available hydrogeolo-
gical and chemical data to determine when, where, and how
pump-and-treat technology can be used successfully to con-
tain and remediate contaminant plumes. It is based on Office
of Research and Development's Basics of Pump-and-Treat
Ground-Water Remediation Technology, EPA/600/8-90/003.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $150 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $300). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 6p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
Hazardous materials, Water pollution control, Office of Solid
Waste and Emergency Response.
1463 Hydrogeology and Results of Aquifer Tests in the
Vicinity of a Hazardous-Waste Disposal Site Near Byron,
Illinois
Order Number PB90-130188CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
Geological Survey, Reston, VA. Water Resources Div.;
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC; Jul 89
The U.S. Geological Survey, in cooperation with the U.S. En-
vironmental Protection Agency, conducted a hydrogeologic
investigation of a Superfund Site near Byron, Illinois. The
purpose of the investigation was to determine the hydrogeo-
logic properties that control the movement of water through
the Galena-Platteville and St. Peter aquifers. These are the
primary domestic water-supply aquifers in the area. Move-
ment of water in the dolomites is mainly through joints, frac-
tures, and solution openings. Ground-water flow in the study
area is from the salvage yard northwestward to the Rock
River. Ground water recharges from the dolomite to the St.
Peter aquifer beneath the salvage yard and discharges from
the Quaternary alluvial aquifer at the river. Analysis of the
Galena-Platteville aquifer-test data indicates that the calculat-
ed aquifer transmissivity ranges from 490 to 670 feet
squared per day, and the calculated specific yield ranges
from 0.017 to 0.140.
Specifications: Prepared in cooperation with Environmental
Protection Agency, Washington, DC. 65p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Hydrogeo-
logy, Waste disposal, Superfund site.
1464 Identification and Compilation of Unsaturated/
Vadose Zone Models
Order Number PB94-157773CDH, price: PC A07/MF A02
Colorado School of Mines, Golden. International Ground
Water Modeling Center.; Robert S. Kerr Environmental
Research Lab., Ada, OK; Mar 94
The present report contains the result of research and infor-
mation processing activities supporting evaluation of the ca-
pabilities of various unsaturated zone flow and transport
models in predicting the movement of hazardous chemical
through soils to ground water. It provides an overview of
major types of models applicable to problems in the unsatu-
rated zone of the subsurface. As chemical transport in soils
is often driven by the movement of water, both flow and
chemical transport models are included. To manage the rap-
idly growing amount of information, IGWMC maintains a de-
283
-------
TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION:
Groundwater Technologies
scriptive model information system, MARS (Model Annotation
Search and Retrieval System). Detailed information on the
reviewed models is presented in a series of tables.
Specifications: See also PB94-157765. Sponsored by
Robert S. Kerr Environmental Research Lab., Ada, OK. 137p.
Subject Index keywords: Hazardous materials, Water flow,
Sediment transport, Ground water, Superfund.
1465 in-situ Bioremedlation of Contaminated Ground
Water
Order Number PB92-224336CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Ertiergency Response; Feb 92
In-situ bioremediation, where applicable, appears to be a po-
tential cost-effective and environmentally acceptable remedi-
ation technology. Suflita (1989) identified characteristics of
the ideal candidate site for successful implementation of in-
situ bioremediation. These characteristics included: (1) a ho-
mogeneous and permeable aquifer; (2) a contaminant origi-
nating from a single source; (3) a low ground-water gradient;
(4) no free product; (5) no soil contamination; and (6) an
easily degraded, extracted, or immobilized contaminant. Ob-
viously, few sites meet these characteristics. However, devel-
opment of information concerning site specific geological and
microbiological characteristics of the aquifer, combined with
knowledge concerning potential chemical, physical, and bio-
chemical fate of the wastes present, can be used to develop
a bioremediation strategy for a less-than-ideal site.
Specifications: See also PB89-219976. 13p.
Subject index keywords: Water pollution control, Biological
treatment! Ground water, Remedial action.
1466 In situ Treatment of Contaminated Ground Water:
An Inventory of Research and Field Demonstrations and
Strategies for Improving Ground Water Remediation
Technologies
Order Number PB93-193720CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Jan 93
The predominance of ground-water contamination at hazard-
ous waste sites and the dearth of methods to efficiently treat
this contamination Is a problem that the U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency (EPA) is examining. The contaminated
ground water found at most Superfund sites is often the limit-
ing factor for complete site remediation. The purpose of the
document is to describe recent research, development and
application of technologies that either treat ground-water
contaminants in place or improve the solubility and mobility
of contaminants to enhance pump-and-treat remediation ef-
fectiveness. The report discusses techniques that can be ap-
pliedin situ and excludes pumping methodologies or surface
treatment systems. In addition, the publication presents con-
clusions based on observations of the survey. Finally, strate-
gies for action for stakeholders concerned with in situ
ground-water technology development are presented. The
study has not defined the extent or activities of research and
development outside of EPA-supported groups.
Specifications: See also PB92-224336. 22p.
Subject index keywords: Ground water, Water pollution
control, Remedial aption, Waste disposal, Hazardous materi-
als, In-situ processing.
1467 Measurement of Hydraulic Conductivity
Distributions: A Manual of Practice
Order Number PB91-211938CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
Auburn Univ., AL. Dept. of Civil Engineering.; Geological
Survey, Denver, CO.*Robert S. Kerr Environmental Research
Lab., Ada, OK; Mar 90
The ability of hydrologists to perform field measurements of
aquifer hydraulic properties must be enhanced in order to
significantly improve the capacity to solve ground water con-
tamination problems at Superfund and other sites. The pri-
mary purpose of the manual is to provide new methodologies
for measuring K(z), the distribution of horizontal hydraulic
conductivity in the vertical direction in the vicinity of a test
well. Measurements in nearby wells can then be used to esti-
mate three-dimensional distributions. As dispersion-dominat-
ed models (particularly two-dimensional, vertically-averaged
models) approach their limitations, it is becoming increasingly
important to develop two-dimensional vertical profile or fully
three-dimensional advection-dominated transport models in
order to significantly increase the ability to understand and
predict contaminant transport, reaction, and degradation in
the field. Such models require the measurement of hydraulic
conductivity distributions, K(z), rather than vertically averaged
values in the form of transmissivities. Three devices for
measuring K(z) distributions (the impeller flowmeter, the
heat-pulse flowmeter, and a multi-level slug test apparatus)
are described in detail, along with application and data re-
duction procedures. Results of the various methods are com-
pared with each other and with the results of tracer studies.
The flowmeter approach emerged as the best candidate for
routine K(z) measurements. Impeller meters are now avail-
able commercially, and the more sensitive flowmeters (heat
pulse and electromagnetic) are expected to be available in
the near future.
Specifications: Prepared in cooperation with Geological
Survey, Denver, CO. Sponsored by Robert S. Kerr Environ-
mental Research Lab., Ada, OK. 73p.
Subject index keywords: Water pollution, Hydraulic conduc-
tivity, Aquifers.
1468 Membrane Treatment of Wood Preserving Site
Groundwater by SBP Technologies, Inc. Applications
Analysis Report
Order Number PB94-131646CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk
Reduction Engineering Lab; Aug 93
The document provides an evaluation of the SBP Technol-
ogies, Inc. (SBP) formed-in-place membrane hyperfiltration
process. The purpose of the technology is to reduce the
volume of waste requiring further treatment through such
techniques as immobilization or destruction. In hyperfiltration,
pollutants are separated on the basis of molecular weight,
molecular size, polarity, or charge. The report summarizes
the utility and application of SBP's membrane system to the
treatment of organic contaminated wastewater. This analysis
utilizes information from the Superfund Innovative Technolo-
gy Evaluation (SITE) Program's demonstration at the Ameri-
can Creosote Works wood preserving site in Pensacola, Flor-
ida as well as data from other SBP investigations. Conclu-
sions were reached concerning the technological effective-
ness and economics of the process and its suitability for use
at other sites and with other waste waters.
Specifications: 56p.
284
-------
TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION:
Groundwater Technologies
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Water pollution con-
trol, Filtration, Membranes.
1469 Methods for Evaluating the Attainment of Cleanup
Standards. Volume 2. Ground Water
Order Number PB94-138815CDH, price: PC A16/MF A03
Westat, Inc., Rockville, MD. Research Div.; Dynamac Corp
Rockville, MD.**SRA Technologies, Inc., Alexandria,
VA.*Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC
Statistical Policy Branch; Jul 92
The reference document provides regional project managers,
on-site coordinators, and their contractors with sampling and
analysis methods for evaluating whether ground water reme-
diation has met pre-established cleanup standards for one or
more chemical contaminants at a hazardous waste site. The
verification of cleanup by evaluating a site relative to a clean-
up standard or an applicable or relevant and appropriate re-
quirement (ARAR) is mandated in Section 121 of the Super-
fund Amendments and Reauthorization Act (SARA). The
document, the second in a series, provides sampling and
data analysis methods for the purpose of verifying attainment
of a cleanup standard in ground water. The first volume ad-
dresses evaluating attainment in soils and solid media.
Volume 2 presents statistical methods which can be used to
address the uncertainty of whether a site has met a cleanup
standard.
Specifications: See also Volume 1, PB89-234959. Prepared
in cooperation with Dynamac Corp., Rockville, MD., and SRA
Technologies, Inc., Alexandria, VA. Sponsored by Environ-
mental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Statistical Policy
Branch. 358p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Standards,
Ground water, Pollution control.
1470 New Approach and Methodologies for
Characterizing the Hydrogeologic Properties of Aquifers
Order Number PB90-187063CDH, price: PC A11/MF A02
Auburn Univ., AL Dept. of Civil Engineering.; Robert S. Kerr
Environmental Research Lab., Ada, OK; Jan 90
In the authors' opinion, the ability of hydrologists to perform
field measurements of aquifer hydraulic properties must be
enhanced if they are to improve significantly the capacity to
solve ground water contamination problems at Superfund
and other sites. Therefore, the primary purpose of the report
is to provide motivation and new methodology for measuring
K(z), the distribution of horizontal hydraulic conductivity in the
vertical direction in the vicinity of a test well. Measurements
in nearby wells can then be used to build up three-dimen-
sional distributions. For completeness, and to enhance the
usefulness of the report as a field manual, existing methodol-
ogy for the measurement of effective porosity, vertical hy-
draulic conductivity, storativity and hydraulic head, are pre-
sented also. It is argued that dispersion-dominated models,
particularly two-dimensional, vertically-averaged (areal)
models, have been pushed about as far as they can go, and
that two-dimensional vertical profile or fully three-dimensional
advection-dominated transport models are necessary if they
are to increase significantly the ability to understand and pre-
dict contaminant transport, reaction, and degradation in the
field. Such models require the measurement of hydraulic
conductivity distributions, K(z), rather than vertically averaged
values in the form of transmissivities.
Specifications: Sponsored by Robert S. Kerr Environmental
Research Lab., Ada, OK. 237p.
Subject index keywords: Aquifers, Hydrogeology, Water
pollution, Waste disposal, Ground water, Mathematical
models, Environmental transport.
1471 Performance Evaluations of Pump-and-Treat
Remediations
Order Number PB92-114461CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Keely (Joseph F.), Portland, OR.; Robert S. Kerr
Environmental Research Lab., Ada, OK; Oct 89
The report contains an overview of the processes affecting
the mobility of contaminants through the subsurface, and the
ability to pump the contaminants from the subsurface for
treatment. It points out the limitations of pump-and-treat re-
mediation techniques and stresses the importance of proper
site characterization and the relevance of computer modeling
as a performance evaluation technique.
Specifications: See also PB90-274549. Sponsored by
Robert S. Kerr Environmental Research Lab., Ada, OK. 21 p.
Subject index keywords: Water pollution, Ground water,
Water treatment.
1472 Potential Sources of Error in Ground-Water
Sampling at Hazardous Waste Sites. Ground Water Issue
Order Number PB94-134376CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Center for
Environmental Research Information; Aug 92
The Regional Superfund Ground Water Forum is a group of
ground-water scientists representing the U.S. EPA's Regional
Superfund Offices that was organized to exchange up-to-
date information related to ground-water remediation at Su-
perfund sites. The paper is intended to familiarize RPMs,
OSCs, and field personnel with the sources of error inherent
to ground-water sampling, and the relative impact of these
errors on sample representativeness. Elements of typical
sampling protocol will be discussed in relation to how these
sources of error can be identified and minimized.
Specifications: See also DE88014685, PB91-133249, and
PB92-114503. 30p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Ground
water, Sampling.
1473 Remediation Completed: But Is the Groundwater
Meeting the Safe Drinking Water Act Requirements.
Haztech International 90. Held in Houston, Texas on May
8-10, 1990
Order Number PB90-262999CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk
Reduction Engineering Lab; May 90
Groundwater treatment is a theme that runs through several
of EPA's programs including Drinking Water, Superfund, Un-
derground Storage Tanks, RCRA, etc. Frequently the same
terms are used in the different programs with quite different
meanings. For example, the phrase 'pump and treat' means
one thing when one is considering treating groundwater for
potable purposes and something quite different for superfund
remediation. Another confusing term is 'site remediation'.
Site remediation can mean different things to different
people depending on their particular point-of-view. Still an-
other problem is the development of technology under one
program that could be used effectively in another program.
Institutional barriers frequently limit the transfer of useful re-
search between programs. The purpose of the paper is to
285
-------
TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION:
Incineration & Thermal Technologies
discuss technology research being conducted in drinking
water that might be useful to some of these other programs.
Specifications: 22p.
Subject index keywords: Ground water, Potable water,
Drinking water.
1474 Subsurface Contamination Reference Guide
Order Number PB91-921292CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Oct 90
The guide was developed to provide a source of information
pertaining to important fate and transport properties for a va-
riety of contaminants commonly found in ground water at Su-
perfund sites. The information may help to focus site investi-
gation efforts and identify early-on potential remediation
strategies. Information pertaining to contaminat fate and
transport properties have been presented in tabular form and
provided as separately published charts for easy reference.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. Package includes three parts: Ref-
erence Guide; Reference Tables 1 and 2 (EPA/540/2-90/
011A); Reference Table 3 (EPA/540/2-90/011B). 26p.
Subject index keywords: Ground water, Hazardous materi-
als, Superfund.
1475 Suggested ROD Language for Various Ground
Water Remediation Options
Order Number PB91-921325CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; 10 Oct 90
The directive provides supplemental guidance to the October
18, 1989 OSWER directive 9355.4-03, entitled 'Consideration
in Ground Water Remediation at Superfund Sites,' which ex-
arn'irSId the role of ground water remediation in Superfund
cleanups and recommends modifications to the current ap-
proach. It offers suggested language for Records of Decision
corresponding to the recommendations 1 and 2 from the
OSWER Directive. The recommendations are: (1) initiation of
early or interim response measures; and (2) provision for
changes in the reriedy during implementation in the Record
of Decision. The Directive offers standard language that may
be employed, when appropriate, to correspond to site-specif-
ic remediation scenarios. Language is suggested for Final
Actions, Contingency Measures/Goals, and Interim Actions.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $150 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $300). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 10p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
Hazardous materials, Water pollution control, Remedial
action, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response,
Records of Decision.
1476 Superfund Ground Water Issue: Accuracy of Depth
to Water Measurements. 2nd in Series of Issue Papers
Order Number PB96-149840CDH, price: PC A01/MF A01
Robert S. Kerr Environmental Research Lab., Ada, OK; Aug
89
The accuracy of depth to water measurements is an issue
identified by the Regional Superfund Ground Water forum as
a cqncern of Superfund decision-makers as they attempt to
determine direction of ground-water flow, areas of recharge
or discharge, the hydraulic characteristics of aquifers, or the
effects of manmade stresses on the ground-water system.
The wetted graduated steel tape, electrical and air line meth-
ods are discussed along with frequency of measurements.
The graduated steel tape method is considered to be the
most accurate for measuring the water level in nonflowing
wells.
Specifications: 5p.
Subject index keywords: Ground water, Water levels,
Water quality management, Water pollution, Superfund pro-
gram.
1477 Superfund Ground Water Issue. Contaminant
Transport in Fractured Media: Models for Decision
Makers
Order Number PB90-268517CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Aug 89
The Regional Superfund Ground Water Forum is a group of
ground-water technical specialists, representing EPA's Re-
gional Superfund Offices, organized to exchange up-to-date
information related to ground-water remediation at Superfund
sites. Mathematical models have a potentially useful role to
play in arriving at a decision on the remedial action to be
taken at a contaminated site. Where there is a need for a
quantitative estimate of the threat to public health resulting
from a particular course of action, of the estimated cost and
time of clean-up for a particular remediation strategy, or of
the results of other actions to be taken at a contaminated
site, mathematical models have a greater potential to provide
the needed information than any other approach to the prob-
lem. For contaminated sites in fractured rock, however, this
potential has yet to be realized.
Specifications: 10p.
Subject index keywords: Ground water, Hazardous materi-
als, Superfund.
TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM
IMPLEMENTATION: Incineration &
Thermal Technologies
1478 Evaluation of Commercially-Available Portable Gas
Chromatographs
Order Number PB93-121051CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
IIT Research Inst., Chicago, IL; ManTech Environmental
Technology, Inc., Research Triangle Park,
NC.* Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle
Park, NC. Atmospheric Research and Exposure Assessment
Lab; 1992
Six commercially-available portable gas Chromatographs
(PGC) were evaluated at a Superfund site during startup of
bioremediation. Concentrations of volatile organic com-
pounds (VOC) were slightly above ambient background
levels. Concurrent colocated grab samples were collected
periodically in Summa-polished canisters. They were ana-
lyzed by Method TO-14 using a mass-sensitive detector. The
grab samples served as standards to assess the accuracy of
data reported by the PGCs.
Specifications: See also PB88-211701. Prepared in coop-
eration with ManTech Environmental Technology, Inc., Re-
search Triangle Park, NC. Sponsored by Environmental Pro-
286
ill .viiii, ii.,;, iHitiiiii.
-------
TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION:
Incineration & Thermal Technologies
tection Agency, Research Triangle Park, NC. Atmospheric
Research and Exposure Assessment Lab. 8p.
Subject index keywords: Chromatographic analysis, Haz-
ardous materials, Superfund.
1479 Evaluation of Portable Gas Chromatographs
Order Number PB93-168813CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
IIT Research Inst, Chicago, IL; ManTech Environmental
Technology, Inc., Research Triangle Park, NC.**Battelle
Columbus Labs., OH.*Environmental Protection Agency,
Research Triangle Park, NC. Atmospheric Research and
Exposure Assessment Lab; 1993
Limits of detection, linearity of responses, and stability of re-
sponse factors and retention times for five commercially-
available portable gas Chromatographs (PGC) were deter-
mined during laboratory evaluation. The PGCs were also op-
erated at the French Limited Superfund site near Houston,
TX during startup of bioremediation. Concentrations of vola-
tile organic compounds (VOC) at the site were slightly above
ambient background levels. Concurrent collocated grab sam-
ples were collected periodically in canisters and analyzed by
Method TO-14 using a mass-selective detector. Canister
data were taken to indicate correct concentrations and were
used to assess the accuracy of PGC data. Durability, reliabil-
ity, and complexity of operation of PGCs were also evaluat-
ed. The principal goal of the study was to determine the best
way to use each instrument as a monitor for airborne VOCs.
Specifications: See also PB90-127374 and PB93-121051.
Prepared in cooperation with ManTech Environmental Tech-
nology, Inc., Research Triangle Park, NC., and Battelle Co-
lumbus Labs., OH. Sponsored by Environmental Protection
Agency, Research Triangle Park, NC. Atmospheric Research
and Exposure Assessment Lab. 14p.
Subject index keywords: Gas chromatography, Volatile or-
ganic compounds, Air pollution, Portable equipment.
1480 Mobile Incineration: An Analysis of the Industry
Order Number PB90-255449CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
Management Associates, Natick, MA.; Versar, Inc.,
Springfield, VA.* Environmental Protection Agency,
Washington, DC. Office of Solid Waste; 30 Jun 89
The report examines the mobile incineration industry, includ-
ing the supply of and demand for mobile incineration arid an
assessment of the incineration market. It was prepared
based on a need to examine mobile incineration that became
apparent during the Environmental Protection Agency's
(EPA) analysis of hazardous waste treatment capacity. EPA
wanted to evaluate whether mobile incinerators can absorb
the demand that other treatment facilities, such as fixed-
based incinerators, cannot handle.
Specifications: Prepared in cooperation with Versar, Inc.,
Springfield, VA. Sponsored by Environmental Protection
Agency, Washington, DC. Office of Solid Waste. 67p.
Subject index keywords: Incinerators, Mobile equipment,
Waste disposal, Hazardous materials.
1481 Mobile/Transportable Incineration Treatment
Order Number PB91-228023CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Science Applications International Corp., Cincinnati, OH.;
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 90
Incineration treats organic contaminants in solids and liquids
by subjecting them to temperatures typically greater than
10OOF in the presence of. oxygen, which causes the volatili-
zation, combustion, and destruction of these compounds.
The bulletin describes mobile/transportable incineration sys-
tems that can be moved to and subsequently removed from
Superfund and other hazardous waste sites. It does not ad-
dress other thermal processes that operate at lower tem-
peratures or those that operate at very high temperatures,
such as plasma arc. It is applicable to a wide range of organ-
ic wastes and is generally not used treating inorganics and
metals. Mobile/transportable incinerators exhibit essentially
the same environmental performance as their stationary
counterparts. To date, 49 of the 95 records of decision
(RODs) designating thermal remedies at Superfund sites
have selected onsite incineration as an integral part of a pre-
ferred treatment alternative. There are 22 commercial-scale
units in operation. The bulletin provides the latest perform-
ance data, site requirements, the status of the technology,
and where to go for further information.
Specifications: Sponsored by Environmental Protection
Agency, Washington, DC. Office of Emergency and Remedial
Response. 10p.
Subject index keywords: Incineration, Portable equipment,
Hazardous materials, Waste treatment, Organic compounds.
1482 Operations and Research at the U.S. EPA
Incineration Research Facility: Annual Report for FY89
Order Number PB90-186339CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
Acurex Corp., Jefferson, AR.; Environmental Protection
Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk Reduction Engineering Lab; -
Mar 90
The Environmental Protection Agency's Incineration Re-
search Facility in Jefferson, Arkansas, is an experimental fa-
cility which houses two pilot-scale incinerators and the asso-
ciated waste handling emission control, process control, and
safety equipment, as well as onsite laboratory facilities.
During Fiscal Year 1989, a major facility expansion and re-
configuration construction effort was completed. Upon com-
pletion of the construction, incineration testing at the Facility
was resumed. Hazardous waste incinerator trace metal emis-
sion regulation development for the Office of Solid Waste
and a Superfund site remediation treatability study for Region
I and the Office of Emergency and Remedial Response were
major program support activities in Fiscal Year 1989.
Specifications: Sponsored by Environmental Protection
Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk Reduction Engineering Lab.
73p.
Subject index keywords: Research projects, Test cham-
bers, Hazardous materials, Waste disposal, Air pollution con-
trol equipment, Soils, US EPA, Incineration, Air pollution sam-
pling.
1483 Operations and Research at the U.S. EPA
Incineration Research Facility: Annual Report for FY90
Order Number PB91-182493CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
Acurex Corp., Jefferson, AR.; Environmental Protection
Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk Reduction Engineering Lab; Apr
91 .
The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's Incineration Re-
search Facility in Jefferson, Arkansas, is an experimental fa-
cility that houses two pilot-scale incinerators and the associ-
ated waste handling, emission control, process control, and
safety equipment; as well as onsite laboratory facilities.
During fiscal year 1990, two major test programs were com-
pleted at the facility: an evaluation of the thermal-stability-
287
-------
TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION:
Incineration & Thermal Technologies
based principal organic hazardous constituent incinerability
ranking for the Office of Solid Waste (OSW), and an incinera-
bility evaluation of five contaminated materials from the
Purity Oil Sales and the McColl Superfund sites for Region 9
and the Office of Emergency and Remedial Response
(OERR). In addition, results of two test programs completed
In FY89 were reported: an evaluation of the fate of trace
metals fed to a rotary kiln incinerator equipped with a single-
stage ionizing wet scrubber for air pollution control for OSW,
and an Incinerability evaluation of arsenic and pesticide con-
taminated soils from the Baird and McGuire Superfund site
for Region 1 and OERR. Several facility and equipment con-
structjpn and upgrade efforts were also completed.
Specifications: See also report for FY89, PB90-186339.
Sponsored by Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati,
OH. Risk Reduction Engineering Lab. 67p.
Subject Index keywords: Incineration, Waste disposal, Haz-
ardous materials, Air pollution control equipment, Environ-
mental research.
1484 Operations and Research at the U.S. EPA
Incineration Research Facility: Annual Report for FY91
Order Number PB92:239540CDH, price: PC A06/MF A02
Acurqjc Corp., Mountain View, CA. Environmental Systems
Div.; Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk
Reduction Engineering Lab; Mar 92
The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's Incineration Re-
search Facility (IRF) in Jefferson, Arkansas, is an experimen-
tal facility that houses two pilot-scale incinerators and the as-
sociated waste handling, emission control, process control,
and safety equipment; as well as onsite laboratory facilities.
During fiscal year 1991, five major test programs were com-
pleted at the facility: tests to establish residue characteristics
from the incineration of spent potliners from aluminum pro-
duction (K088) for the Office of Solid Waste (OSW); an eval-
uation of the incinerability of five contaminated soils from the
Drake Chemical Superfund site for Region 3; an evaluation
of the Incinerability of PCB-contaminated marine sediments
from the New Bedford Harbor Superfund site for Region 1; a
parametric evaluation of the fate of trace metals in a rotary
kiln incinerator equipped with a Calvert high-efficiency scrub-
ber system; and an evaluation of incinerability of arsenic-con-
taminated soil from the Chemical Insecticide Corporation Su-
perfund site for Region 2.
Specifications: See also PB91-182493. Sponsored by Envi-
ronmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk Reduction
Engineering Lab. 117p.
Subject Index keywords: Hazardous materials, Incinerators,
Waste disposal, Air pollution control.
1485 Operations and Research at the U.S. EPA
Incineration Research Facility: Annual Report for FY92
Order Number PB94:114659CDH, price: PC A06/MF A02
Acurex Environmental Corp., Jefferson, AR.; Environmental
Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk Reduction
Engineering Lab; Jun 93
The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's Incineration Re-
search Facility (IRF) in Jefferson, Arkansas, is an experimen-
tal facility that houses two pilot-scale incinerators and the as-
sociated waste handling, emission control, process control,
and safety equipment; as well as onsite laboratory facilities.
During fiscal year 1992, three major test programs were
completed at the facility: an evaluation of the incinerability of
two contaminated sludges from the Bofors-Nobel Superfund
site for Region 5, an evaluation of the incinerability of PCB-
contaminated soil from the Scientific Chemical Processing
Superfund site for Region 2, and an evaluation of the effects
of repeated incinerator waste feed cutoffs on incinerator par-
ticulate, HCI, trace metal, and organic constituent emissions
for the Office of Solid Waste and the EPA incinerator permit
writers.
Specifications: See also PB92-239540. Sponsored by Envi-
ronmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk Reduction
Engineering Lab. 120p.
Subject index keywords: Incineration, Hazardous materials,
Research projects.
1486 Potential Surrogate Metals for Incinerator Trial
Burns
Order Number PB94-162716CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Acurex Environmental Corp., Jefferson, AR.; Environmental
Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk Reduction
Engineering Lab; 1994
Over the past four years, the research program at the Envi-
ronmental Protection Agency's (EPA's) Incinerator Research
Facility (IRF) has developed an extensive body of metals
partitioning data from pilot-scale incineration tests using syn-
thetic hazardous wastes, actual listed hazardous wastes, and
contaminated materials from Superfund sites. Because
metals volatility dominates partitioning, surrogates can be
used and the choice of surrogates is simplified. The paper
discusses the results of three extensive parametric test pro-
grams performed at the IRF using synthetic hazardous
wastes containing both hazardous constituent and potential
surrogate metals. These results show that surrogates parti-
tion in the same manner as selected hazardous constituent
metals. Thus, the use of surrogates deserves consideration,
if not in actual trial burns, then at least in scoping tests used
to guide the formal trial burn.
Specifications: Pub. in Proceedings of the 1993 Inciner-
ation Conference, Knoxville, TN., May 3-7, 1993, p434-440.
See also PB90-263864, PB90-263872, PB91 -223388 and
PB91 -223396. Sponsored by Environmental Protection
Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk Reduction Engineering Lab.
Subject index keywords: Incinerators, Scrubbers, Hazard-
ous materials, Air pollution control equipment, Meetings, Trial
burn, Metal partitioning.
1487 Thermal Desorption Treatment (February 1994)
Order Number PB94-160603CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Science Applications International Corp., Cincinnati, OH.;
Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk
Reduction Engineering Lab; Feb 94
The bulletin discusses various aspects of the thermal de-
sorption technology including applicability, limitations of its
use, residuals produced, performance data, site require-
ments, status of the technology, and sources of further infor-
mation. The document is an update of the original bulletin
published in May 1991 (PB92-228080).
Specifications: See also PB91 -228080, PB93-1 26597 and
PB93-1 33387. Sponsored by Environmental Protection
Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk Reduction Engineering Lab.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste treatment,
Thermal desorption.
288
-------
TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Soil
Cleanup Technologies
TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM
IMPLEMENTATION: Soil Cleanup
Technologies
1488 Analysis of Treatability Data for Soil and Debris:
Evaluation of Land Ban Impact on Use of Superfund
Treatment Technologies
Order Number PB90-258476CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; 30 Nov 89
The directive summarizes the effectiveness of treatment
technologies for contaminated soil and debris and provides
support for decisions by the Regions to use treatability var-
iances for complying with the RCRA Land Ban Disposal Re-
strictions.
Specifications: 25p.
Subject index keywords: Regulations, Superfund, Remedial
action, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response, Soil
contamination, Land Disposal Restrictions.
1489 Aseptic Sampling of Unconsolidated Heaving Soils
in Saturated Zones
Order Number PB91-216218CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Robert S. Kerr Environmental Research Lab., Ada, OK; 1991
Collecting undisturbed subsurface soil samples in noncohe-
sive, heaving sandy environments below the water table has
been extremely difficult using conventional soil sampling
equipment. Several modifications of the conventional hollow-
stem auger coring procedures were adapted, which allowed
collection of depth-discreet soil samples in very fluid, heaving
sands. These methods were used where accurate subsur-
face characterization of the contamination of RCRA and
CERCLA sites was essential. Cohesionless cores were con-
sistently retrieved, aseptically extruded from the core barrel
inside an anaerobic environmental chamber, and preserved
in the field. The physical, chemical, and biological integrity of
discreet soil intervals was maintained for laboratory analysis.
Statistical analysis of repeated collection of soil samples
from the same depth intervals in nearby boreholes was docu-
mented.
Specifications: 17p.
Subject index keywords: Subsurface investigations, Soil
analysis, Land pollution, Waste disposal, Soil contamination.
1490 BioGenesis (Trade Name) Soil Washing Technology:
Innovative Technology Evaluation Report
Order Number PB94-120045CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
PRC Environmental Management, Inc., Rolling Meadows, IL;
Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk
Reduction Engineering Lab; 2 Sep 93
Soil washing technologies are designed to transfer contami-
nants from soil to a liquid phase. The BioGenesis Soil Wash-
ing Technology uses soil washing with a proprietary surfac-
tant solution to transfer organic contaminants from soils to
wastewater. The BioGenesis soil washing process was evalu-
ated under the SITE program at a refinery where soils were
contaminated with crude oil. Results of chemical analyses
show that levels of total recoverable petroleum hydrocarbons
(TRPH), an indicator of degraded crude oil, decreased by 65
to 73 percent in washed soils. The TRPH in residual soils
were allowed to biodegrade for an additional 120 days. Re-
sults indicate that soil washing and biodegradation removed
85 to 88 percent of TRPH in treated soils. The Innovative
Technology Evaluation Report provides information on the
technology applicability, economic analysis, technology limi-
tations, a technology description, process residuals, site re-
quirements, latest performance data, the technology status,
vendors claims, and the source of further information.
Specifications: Sponsored by Environmental Protection
Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk Reduction Engineering Lab.
72p.
Subject index keywords: Land pollution control, Superfund,
Soil washing.
1491 Biological Assessment of Toxicity Caused by
Chemical Constituents Eluted from Site Soils Collected
at the Drake Chemical Superfund Site, Lock Haven,
Clinton Co., Pennsylvania
Order Number PB91-186965CDH, price: PC A20
Corvallis Environmental Research Lab., OR; Feb 91
The site was used to manufacture specialty intermediate
chemicals for the producers of dyes, Pharmaceuticals, cos-
metics, herbicides, and pesticides. The herbicide Fenac
(2,3,6-trichlorophenylacetic acid) is a major on- and off-site
contaminant. One-hundred-twenty-eight soils were collected.
Elutriates were prepared for toxicity evaluation of water ex-
tractable constituents. The chemical nature of the elutriates
was so complex that it was impossible to determine chemical
cause/biological effect relationships based on chemical anal-
yses alone. Bioassays identified locations of toxicity on the
site without identifying the causative agents; important be-
cause numerical criteria are not available for many organic
chemicals and there is little understanding of the affects of
mixtures of chemicals in complex wastes on test organisms
or the environment. The measured response represents an
actual assessment of any synergistic or antagonistic interac-
tions. Fifty-nine percent of the 128 elutriates were toxic to
the algae Selenastrum capricornutum and 43 percent were
toxic to Daphnia magna. Both organisms indicated that toxic
sample numbers increased with depth of sampling. The Toxi-
chromotest (bacteria) revealed toxicity in 2.3% of the 128
elutriates; all had been identified by algae and Daphnia. Ten
elutriates were toxic only to Daphnia and 30 only to S. capri-
cornutum. Fifty-one were toxic to both algae and Daphnia,
but Daphnia was most sensitive in only 8 elutriates. If one
test was used, 10 to 30 toxic elutriates would have not been
identified, depending on the test organism selected.
Specifications: Portions of this document are not fully legi-
ble. 456p.
Subject index keywords: Biological effects, Chemical com-
pounds, Superfund, Land pollution, Waste disposal.
1492 BioTrol Soil Washing System for Treatment of a
Wood Preserving Site: Applications Analysis Report
Order Number PB92-115245CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
Science Applications International Corp., Paramus, NJ.;
Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk
Reduction Engineering Lab; Mar 92
The report analyzes the results of the SITE Program demon-
stration of BioTrol's Soil Washing System at the MacGillis &
Gibbs wood treatment facility in New Brighton, MN. The con-
taminants of primary interest are pentachlorophenol (penta)
and polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs). From tests
with two soils (130 mg/kg and 680 mg/kg penta), it is con-
cluded that the soil washer effectively segregates contami-
289
-------
TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Soil
Cleanup Technologies
nated soil into a large fraction of relatively uncontaminated
washed soil, a small fraction of fine clay and silt retaining
about 30% of the original penta contamination, contaminated
woody debris and contaminated process water. Biotreatment
of the process water from the two soil washing tests degrad-
ed 91-94% of the penta; removal of PAHs could not be de-
termined. While steady state was not achieved, the biological
treatment of the contaminated fines in a Slurry Bio-Reactor
suggested that >90% removal of penta and PAHs could be
achieved with a fully acclimated system. Combined operating
and capital costs for an integrated, full-scale system are esti-
mated to be $168/ton of soil treated; incineration of the
woody debris is a major cost factor.
Specifications: See also PB92-115302 and PB92-150655.
Sponsored by Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati,
OH. Risk Reduction Engineering Lab. 67p.
Subject index keywords: Wood preservatives, Soil treat-
ment, Waste management, Biological treatment, Soil wash-
ing, BioTrol soil washers.
1493 Characterization of Contaminated Soil from the
Montclair/Glen Ridge, New Jersey, Superfund Sites
Order Number PB90:168Q63CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
Office of Radiation Programs, Washington, DC; Sep 89
The Report describes the soil characterization phase conduct-
ed at the EPA Eastern Environmental Radiation Facility
(EERF) In Montgomery, Alabama. The identification of the
spatial distribution of the radium within the soil and its asso-
ciation with specific minerals or materials is shown to relate
to the later implementation phase. Procedures developed in
the investigation have application to other radioactively con-
taminated Superfund sites.
Specifications: 61 p.
Subject index keywords: Radioactive isotopes, Soil proper-
ties, Pollution.
1494 Characterization Protocol for Radioactive
Contaminated Soils
Ordei Nurriber PB92-963354CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; May 92
The fact sheet presents the soil characterization process ap-
plicable in the RI/FS stages of the Superfund process to
support the development of technologies for on-site volume
reduction of radioactive soils by physical separation technol-
ogies.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 8p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Pollution
control, Radioactive waste disposal, Superfund.
1495 Characterizing soils for hazardous waste site
assessments
Order Number DE91014097CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response.; Department of
Energy, Washington, DC; 1991
The purpose of this paper is to provide guidance to Remedial
Project Managers (RPM) and On-Scene Coordinators (OSC)
concerning soil characterization data types required for deci-
sion-making in the CERCLA RI/FS process related to risk
assessment and remedial alternative evaluation for contami-
nated soils. The information presented in this paper is a
compilation of current information from the literature and
from experience combined to meet the purpose of this
paper. This paper addresses two concerns related to soil
characterization for CERCLA remedial response. The first
concern is the applicability of traditional soil classification
methods to CERCLA soil characterization. The second is the
identification of soil characterization data types required for
CERCLA risk assessment and analysis of remedial alterna-
tives. These concerns are related, in that the Data Quality
Objective (DQO) process addresses both. The DQO process
was developed, in part, to assist CERCLA decision-makers in
identifying the data types, data quality, and data quantity re-
quired to support decisions that must be made during the Rl/
FS process. This process as it relates to CERCLA soil char-
acterization is discussed in the Data Quality Objective sec-
tion of this paper. 99 refs., 2 figs., 4 tabs.
Specifications: Sponsored by Department of Energy, Wash-
ington, DC. 26p.
Subject index keywords: Remedial Action, Hazardous Ma-
terials, Remedial Project Managers, On-scene Coordinates,
Soil characterization, Waste management.
1496 Control of Aromatic Waste Air Streams by Soil
Bioreactors
Order Number PB92-144021CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Robert S. Kerr Environmental Research Lab., Ada, OK.;
Oklahoma Univ., Norman. Environmental and Ground Water
Inst; C1991
Contamination of groundwater resources is a serious envi-
ronmental problem which is continuing to increase in occur-
rence in the United States. It has been reported that leaking
underground gasoline storage tanks may pose the most seri-
ous threat of all sources of groundwater contamination. Gas-
olines are comprised of a variety of aliphatic and aromatic
hydrocarbons. The aromatic portion consists primarily of ben-
zene, toluene, ethylbenzene, and xylenes (BTEX com-
pounds). BTEX compounds are also among the most fre-
quency identified substances at Superfund sites. Pump and
treat well systems are the most common and frequently used
technique for aquifer restoration. Treatment is often in the
form of air stripping to remove the volatile components from
the contaminated water. Additionally, soil ventilation process-
es have been used to remove volatile components from the
vadose zone. Both air stripping and soil ventilation produce a
waste gas stream containing volatile compounds which is
normally treated by carbon adsorption or incineration. Both
treatment processes require a substantial capital investment
and continual operation and maintenance expenditures. The
objective of the study was to examine the potential of using
soil bioreactors to treat a waste gas stream produced by air
stripping or soil ventilation process. Previous studies have
shown that various hydrocarbons can be successfully treated
with soils. The study examined the removal of BTEX com-
pounds within soil columns and the influence of soil type,
inlet concentration, and inlet flow rate on the removal effi-
ciency.
Specifications: Pub. in Environmental Progress, v10 n4
p300-306 Nov 91. Prepared in cooperation with Oklahoma
Univ., Norman. Environmental and Ground Water Inst. 9p.
Subject index keywords: Soil treatment, Land pollution
control, Water pollution control, Biodegradation, Aromatic
compounds.
290
-------
TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Soil
Cleanup Technologies
1497 Determining Soil Response Action Levels Based on
Potential Contaminant Migration to Ground Water: A
Compendium of Examples
Order Number PB90-183575CDH, price: PC A07/MF A01
Booz-Allen and Hamilton, Inc., Washington, DC.;
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Oct 89
The document presents case studies illustrating various
methods that have been used at Superfund sites to calculate
soil cleanup levels based on the potential for hazardous con-
stituents to migrate to and contaminate ground water. In ad-
dition, several methods for which case studies could not be
identified have been included in a separate section. The pur-
pose of the document is not to recommend specific meth-
ods; none of the methods or example analyses have been
verified over the long-term. The compendium should be
viewed as a resource which illustrates the importance of as-
sessing the impact of soil contaminants on ground water and
the effects various parameters have on contaminant migra-
tion through the unsaturated zone.
Specifications: Also available from Supt. of Docs. Spon-
sored by Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC.
Office of Emergency and Remedial Response. 145p.
Subject index keywords: Ground water, Environmental
transport, Soils, Hazardous materials, Superfund, Cleanup.
1498 Development of Electro-Acoustic Soil
Decontamination (ESD) Process for In situ Applications
Order Number PB90-204728CDH, price: PC A07/MF A01
Battelle Columbus Labs., OH.; Environmental Protection
Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk Reduction Engineering Lab; Apr
90
The technical feasibility of electro-acoustic soil decontamina-
tion process through lab experiments demonstrated the re-
moval/concentration of heavy metals such as cadmium and
zinc. Results of the decane contaminated soils were, howev-
er, inconclusive. The ESD process is based on the applica-
tion of a d.c. electric field and acoustic field in the presence
of a conventional hydraulic gradient to contaminated soils to
enhance the transport of liquid and metal ions through the
soils. Electrodes (one or more anodes and a cathode) and
an acoustic source were placed in contaminated soils to
apply an electric field and an acoustic field to the soil. This
process works especially well with clay-type soils having
small pores or capillaries, where hydraulic permeability is
very low. The development program included a literature
review, soil characterization, design and construction of the
laboratory ESD unit, and lab scale experiments with soils
contaminated with decane, zinc and cadmium. Evaluation of
the experimental results indicated that application of the field
sources reduced the heavy metals zinc and cadmium more
than 90% in the treated cake. Tests yielded 10-20% decane
removal.
Specifications: Sponsored by Environmental Protection
Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk Reduction Engineering Lab.
141 p.
Subject index keywords: Soils, Pollution control, Remedial
action, Heavy metals, Electroacoustic waves.
1499 Developments in Chemical Treatment of
Contaminated Soil
Order Number PB92-152933CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk
Reduction Engineering Lab; 1992
The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's Office of Re-
search and Development (ORD) is examining processes for
remedial action at Superfund sites, and corrective action at
operating disposal sites. Recent legislation emphasizes de-
struction and detoxification of contaminants, rather than con-
tainment or storage of contaminated soils. Chemical treat-
ment appears promising because it can destroy or greatly
change many contaminants. Oxidation, reduction, neutraliza-
tion, hydrolysis, dehalogenation, and UV/photolysis are
chemical processes currently used for aboveground treat-
ment. Temperature and physical and chemical characteristics
of soil are some operating parameters that control the effec-
tiveness of these processes. Excalibur catalytic ozone tech-
nology, Exxon and Rio Linda cyanide destruction, and Trinity
ultrasonic detoxification are innovative technologies that
have been, or are currently being considered for pilot-scale
demonstrations.
Specifications: Presented at Panamerican Chemical Con-
gress (2nd), San Juan, Puerto Rica, September 24-29, 1991.
See also PB90-155607. 22p.
Subject index keywords: Soil treatment, Waste treatment,
Remedial action, Superfund, Chemical treatment.
1500 Distribution of DRAFT Soil Screening Level
Guidance
Order Number PB93-963508CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 30 Sep 93
The memorandum transmits a second review draft of the Soil
Screening Levels Guidance to be used as a 'working draft' in
discussions with the Regions, States, and other stakeholders
as we refine and finalize the guidance by the summer of
1994. Only minor changes have been made to the August
19,1993 draft for clarification with the exception of Table 1;
this table has been changed to reflect newly obtained chemi-
cal-specific information. The more significant technical and
policy issues raised during the August comment period will
be addressed in FY '94 through a series of technical analy-
ses, Regional pilot studies, and outreach efforts.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 17p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Soil contamination,
Hazardous materials.
1501 EPA Engineering Issue: Technology Alternatives for
the Remediation of PCB-Contaminated Soil and
Sediment
Order Number PB94-144250CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Science Applications International Corp., McLean, VA.;
Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk
Reduction Engineering Lab; Oct 93
The document is intended to familiarize On-scene Coordina-
tors (OSCs) and Remedial Project Managers (RPMs) with
issues important to the successful selection of technology al-
ternatives available for the remediation of soil and sediment
contaminated with PCBs at Superfund sites. The primary pur-
291
-------
TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Soil
Cleanup Technologies
pose of the report is to provide OSCs and RPMs with infor-
mation on established, demonstrated, and emerging technol-
ogy alternatives for remediating PCB-contaminated soil and
sediment. The secondary purpose is to provide basic infor-
mation on characteristics of PCBs, regulations governing
PCB remediation, sampling and data collection methods ap-
plicable to PCB contamination, analytical methods and tech-
nologies used to quantify PCB contamination, treatability
studies, and sources of further information.
Specifications: See also PB86-232774 and PB91-921206.
Sponsored by Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati,
OH. Risk Reduction Engineering Lab. 27p.
Subject index keywords: Polychlorinated biphenyls, Soil
contamination, Remediation.
1502 EPA SITE Demonstration of the BioTrol Soil
Washing Process
Order Number PB92-150655CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk
Reduction Engineering Lab.; Science Applications
International Corp., Paramus, NJ; c1992
A pilot-scale soil washing process, patented by BioTrol, was
demonstrated on soil that was contaminated by wood treat-
ing waste. The BioTrol Soil Washing was demonstrated in a
treatment train sequence with two other pilot-scale units of
BioTrol technologies for treatment of waste streams from the
soil washer. The three technologies of the treatment train
were: The BioTrol 'Soil Washer (BSW), the BioTrol Aqueous
Trealrnent System (BATS), and the Slurry Bioreactor (SBR).
The BioTrol processes were evaluated on pentachlorophenol
(PGP) and polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), which
were the primary soil contaminants at the site. The sandy
site soil, consisting of less than 10% of fines, was well suited
for treatment by soil washing. The BSW successfully separat-
ed the feed soil (100% by weight) into 83% of washed soil,
10% of woody residues, and 7% of fines. The soil washer
achieved up to 89% removal of PCP and PAHs, based on
the difference between their levels in the feed soil and in the
washed soil. The BATS degraded up to 94% of PCP in the
process water from soil washing. The SBR achieved over
90% removals of PCP and 70-90% removals of PAHs, re-
spectively from the soil washing. Cost of a commercial-scale
soil washing, assuming use of all three technologies, was es-
timated to be S168 per ton of treated soil.
Specifications: Pub. in Jnl. of Air and Waste Management
Association, v42 n1 p96-103 1991. See also PB91-182279
and PB91-228056. Prepared in cooperation with Science Ap-
plications International Corp., Paramus, NJ. 29p.
Subject index keywords: Biological industrial waste treat-
men!, Soils, Land pollution, Wood preservatives, BioTrol
aqueous treatment system, BioTrol soil washers, Slurry bio-
reactors, Superfund.
1503 Evaluation and Testing of a Protocol to Determine
the Aerobic Degradation Potential of Hazardous Waste
Constituents in Soil
Order Number PB91-233296CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk
Reduction Engineering Lab. Agricultural Research Service,
BeltsyiHe, MD. Beltsyille Agricultural Research Center; 1990
The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) in conjunc-
tion with the U.S. Department of Agriculture is currently test-
Ing a protocol for determining the 'Aerobic Degradation Po-
tential of Hazardous Organic Constituents in Soil' to ensure
its reliability, accuracy, cost effectiveness, and ease of use.
This protocol is part of EPA's Office of Research and Devel-
opment efforts to provide Federal and State EPA offices as
well as consultants and industries with guidelines and en-
couragement for conducting standardized treatability studies.
Testing of the protocol has been initiated with standardized
soil (obtained from EPA's Synthetic Soil Matrix, Edison, NJ).
Two surrogate pollutants, toluene, a volatile, and phenol, a
sernivolatile, are being tested as representative, easily biode-
gradable compounds. Critical aspects of the protocol involv-
ing the configuration of the test reactor and procedures for
trapping the volatiles have been identified. Once fine tuning
of the process is completed, testing of combinations of com-
pounds in a variety of soil matrices is planned.
Specifications: Presented at the Air and Waste Manage-
ment Association Annual Meeting and Exhibition (83rd) held
in Pittsburgh, PA. on June 24-29, 1990. Prepared in coopera-
tion with Agricultural Research Service, Beltsville, MD. Belts-
ville Agricultural Research Center. 9p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Aerobic
processes, Biological treatment, Land pollution control,
Waste management, Biodeterioration.
1504 Evaluation of Alternative Treatment Technologies
for CERCLA Soils and Debris (Summary of Phase 1 and
Phase 2)
Order Number PB91-240572CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
PEI Associates, Inc., Cincinnati, OH.; International
Technology Corp., Knoxville, TN.**Bruck, Hartman and
Esposito, Inc., Cincinnati, OH.*Environmental Protection
Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk Reduction Engineering Lab;
Sep 91
The study was conducted in two phases. In the first phase, a
synthetic soil matrix was prepared as a theoretical composite
of Superfund soils nationwide. In the second phase, soils
from actual Superfund sites were treated. Three treatment
technologies were evaluated in both phases: (1) chemical
treatment (KPEG), (2) physical treatment (soils washing), and
(3) low-temperature thermal desorption. The Phase I study
also included the evaluation of incineration and stabilization.
Comparison of results obtained in the treatment of Superfund
soils and the synthetic soils reveals that the trend in con-
taminant removals was similar for both types of soils. The
percentage removal, however, was higher for synthetic soils
than for actual Superfund soils. This can be attributed to the
fact that the synthetic soils were spiked and tested without
allowing much time for sorption of the contaminant onto the
soils. In contrast, the actual Superfund soils had weathered
for long periods of time before treatment was attempted;
therefore, contaminant removal was shown to be more diffi-
cult on the actual soils.
Specifications: Prepared in cooperation with International
Technology Corp., Knoxville, TN., and Bruck, Hartman and
Esposito, Inc., Cincinnati, OH. Sponsored by Environmental
Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk Reduction Engineer-
ing Lab. 71 p.
Subject index keywords: Soil treatment, Waste treatment,
Superfund, Remedial action.
292
-------
TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Soil
Cleanup Technologies
1505 Evaluation of Soil Venting Application. Ground
Water Issue
Order Number PB92-235605CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Apr 92
The Regional Superfund Ground-Water Forum is a group of
scientists, representing EPA's Regional Superfund Offices,
organized to exchange up-to-date information related to
ground-water remediation at Superfund sites. One of the
major issues of concern to the Forum is the transport and
fate of contaminants in soil and ground water as related to
subsurface remediation. The ability of soil venting to inexpen-
sively remove large amounts of volatile organic compounds
(VOCs) from contaminated soils is well established. Howev-
er, the time required using venting to remediate soils to low
contaminant levels often required by state and federal regu-
lators has not been adequately investigated. Discussion is
presented to aid in evaluating the feasibility of venting appli-
cation. Methods to optimize venting application are also dis-
cussed.
Specifications: 9p.
Subject index keywords: Waste management, Superfund,
Hazardous materials, Water pollution control, Ground water,
Soil venting, Innovative treatment technologies.
1506 Extraction and Recovery of Lead Species from Soil
Order Number PB93-150142CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk
Reduction Engineering Lab; c1992
The remediation of lead contaminated soil at Superfund and
urban soil is a serious concern, given the grave effects of
lead exposure and the pervasive nature of the threat. The
lead species of interest are elemental lead, lead sulfate,
basic carbonate of lead and lead dioxide. These species
were solubilized in a three step process, using pure chemi-
cals and the total lead was recovered as lead sulfate. Bench
scale experiment were done using a soil that was dosed with
varying amounts of the contaminants (Total lead from 1,000
to 10,000 ppm.). Better than 80% of the contaminants was
recovered as lead sulfate, using the three step process. The
treated soil passed the TCLP test with 3.0 ppm of lead,
showing that it could be redeposited on site. A pilot plant
scale-up is being explored.
Specifications: Pub. in Environmental Progress, v11 n4
P256-260 Nov 92. See also PB87-142378. 8p.
Subject index keywords: Soil treatment, Lead(Metal), Re-
medial action, Land pollution control, Lead inorganic com-
pounds.
1507 Ground-Water Issue: Soil sampling and analysis for
volatile organic compounds
Order Number DE91016758CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Monitoring Systems Lab., Las Vegas, NV; Feb
91
The Regional Superfund Ground Water Forum is a group of
ground-water scientists that represents EPA's Regional Su-
perfund Offices. The forum was organized to exchange up-
to-date information related to groundwater remediation at Su-
perfund sites. Sampling of soils for volatile organic com-
pounds (VOCs) is an issue identified by the Ground Water
Forum as a concern of Superfund decision makers. Con-
cerns over data quality have raised many questions related
to sampling soils for VOCs. This paper was prepared in re-
sponse to some of these questions and concerns expressed
by Remedial Project Managers (RPMs) and On-Scene Coor-
dinators (OSCs). 53 refs., 6 figs., 12 tabs.
Specifications: 34p.
Subject index keywords: Organic Compounds, Soils, US
EPA, Land pollution, Water pollution control, Remedial
action.
1508 Guide: Methods for Evaluating the Attainment of
Cleanup Standards for Soils and Solid Media
Order Number PB91-921365CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Jul 91
The fact sheet highlights statistical concepts and methods
used in the evaluation of the attainment of cleanup stand-
ards. It provides an example of a basic procedure for deter-
mining sample size required to obtain a given confidence
level focusing on a cleanup standard specified as a mean
concentration with a specified confidence. It does not pro-
vide policy on specification of cleanup levels but should be
considered a technical reference guide for using some of the
more common methodologies.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $150 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $300). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 8p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste dis-
posal, Superfund.
1509 In situ Bioremediation of Contaminated Unsaturated
Subsurface Soils
Order Number PB93-234565CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Utah State Univ., Logan.; Robert S. Kerr Environmental
Research Lab., Ada, OK; May 93
An emerging technology for the remediation of unsaturated
subsurface soils involves the use of microorganisms to de-
grade contaminants which are present in such soils. Under-
standing the processes which drive in situ bioremediation, as
well as the effectiveness and efficiency of the utilization of
these systems, are issues which have been identified by the
Regional Superfund Engineering Forum as concerns of Su-
perfund decision makers. Although in situ bioremediation has
been used for a number of years in the restoration of ground
water contaminated by petroleum hydrocarbons, it has only
been in recent years that in situ systems have been directed
toward contaminants in unsaturated subsurface soils. Re-
search has contributed greatly to understanding the biotic,
chemical, and hydrologic parameters which contribute to or
restrict the application of in-situ bioremediation and has been
successful at a number of locations in demonstrating its ef-
fectiveness at field scale.
Specifications: Sponsored by Robert S. Kerr Environmental
Research Lab., Ada, OK. 18p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Soil chemistry, Micro-
organisms control(Water), Water pollution control, Bioreme-
diation.
1510 In situ Soil Flushing. Engineering Bulletin
Order Number PB92-180025CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Oct 91
In situ soil flushing is the extraction of contaminants from the
soil with water or other suitable aqueous solutions. Soil flush-
ing is accomplished by passing the extraction fluid through
293
-------
TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Soil
Cleanup Technologies
In-place soils using ah injection or infiltration process. Extrac-
tion fluids must be recovered and, when possible, are recy-
cled! the method is potentially applicable to all types of soil
contgrnlnants. Soil flushing enables removal of contaminants
from the soil and Is most effective in permeable soils. An ef-
fective collection system is required to prevent migration of
contaminants and potentially toxic extraction fluids to uncon-
taminated areas of the aquifer. Soil flushing, in conjunction
with in situ bioremediatign, may be a cost-effective means of
soil remediation at certain sites. Typically, soil flushing is
used in conjunction with other treatments that destroy con-
taminants or remove them from the extraction fluid and
groundwater.
Specifications: See also PB87-146007, PB90-155607, and
PB9Q-274Q93. 10p.
Subject index keywords: In-situ processing, Soil treatment,
Land pollution control, Waste management, Hazardous mate-
rials, Soil flushing.
1511 In situ Soil Vapor Extraction Treatment
Order Number PB91-228P72CPH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Science Applications International Corp., Cincinnati, OH.; FW
Energy Applications, inc.; Livingston, NJ.*Environmental
Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of Emergency
and Remedial Response; May 91
Soil vapor extraction (SVE) is designed to physically remove
volatile compounds, generally from the vadose or unsaturat-
ed zone. It is an in situ process employing vapor extraction
wells alone or in combination with air injection wells. Vacuum
blowers supply the motive force, inducing air flow through
the soil matrix. The air strips the volatile compounds from the
soil and carries them to the screened extraction well. Air
emissions from the systems are typically controlled by ad-
sorption of the volatiles onto activated carbon, thermal de-
struction (incineration or catalytic oxidation), or condensation
by refrigeration. SVE is a developed technology that has
been used in commercial operations for several years. The
final determination of the lowest cost alternative will be more
site-specific than process equipment dominated. The bulletin
provides information on the technology applicability, the limi-
tations of the technology, the technology description, the
types of residuals produced, site requirements, the latest per-
formance data, the status of the technology, and sources for
further information.
Specifications: Prepared in cooperation with FW Energy
Applications, Inc., Livingston, NJ. Sponsored by Environmen-
tal Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of Emergency
and Remedial Response. 12p.
Subject index keywords: Soil treatment, Hazardous materi-
als, Air flow, Extraction, In-situ processing, Soil vapor, extrac-
tion.
1512 In situ Steam Extraction Treatment
Order Number PB91-228064CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Science Applications International Corp., Cincinnati, OH.;
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; May 91
In situ steam extraction removes volatile and semivolatile
hazardous contaminants from soil and groundwater without
excavation of the hazardous waste. Waste constituents are
removed in situ by the technology and are not actually treat-
ed. The use of steam enhances the stripping of volatile con-
taminants from soil and can be used to displace contaminat-
ed groundwater under some conditions. The resultant con-
densed liquid contaminants can be recycled or treated prior
to disposal. The steam extraction process is applicable to or-
ganic wastes but has not been used for removing insoluble
inorganics and metals. Steam is injected into the ground to
raise the soil temperature and drive off volatile contaminants.
Alternatively, steam can be injected to form a displacement
front by steam condensation to displace groundwater. The
contaminated liquid and steam condensate are then collect-
ed for further treatment. Two types of systems are discussed
in the document: the mobile system and the stationary
system. The bulletin provides information on the technology
applicability, limitations, a description of the technology,
types of residuals produced, site requirements, the latest per-
formance data, the status of the technology, and sources for
further information.
Specifications: Sponsored by Environmental Protection
Agency, Washington, DC. Office of Emergency and Remedial
Response. 9p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, In-situ proc-
essing, Water pollution control, Ground water, Soil treatment,
Extraction.
1513 Innovative Technology: Glycolate Dehalogenatibn
Order Number PB90-274226CDH, price: PC A01/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Nov 89
The fact sheet provides technology description, site charac-
teristics affecting treatment feasibility, technology consider-
ations, and technology status for Glycolate Dehalpgenation.
The sheet describes the process as being potentially effec-
tive in detoxifying specific types of aromatic organic contami-
nants, particularly dioxins and PCBs.
Specifications: 5p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Superfund,
Waste management, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
Response, Dehalogenation, Glycolic acid.
1514 Innovative Technology: In-situ Vitrification
Order Number PB90-274192CDH, price: PC A01/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Nov 89
The fact sheet provides technology description, site charac-
teristics affecting treatment feasibility, technology consider-
ations, and technology status for In-Situ Vitrification (ISV).
The sheet describes how ISV can be used to treat soils and
sludges contaminated with mixtures of various waste types
(e.g. radioactive, inorganic and/or organic).
Specifications: 5p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Vitrification,
Superfund, Waste management, Office of Solid Waste and
Emergency Response, In-situ processing.
1515 Innovative Technology: Soil Washing
Order Number PB90-274184CDH, price: PC A01/MF Apt
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Nov 89
The fact sheet provides technology description, site charac-
teristics affecting treatment feasibility, technology consider-
ations, and technology status for soil washing. The fact
sheet describes how soil washing can be potentially benefi-
cial in the separation/segregation and volumetric reduction
of hazardous materials in solids, sludges, and sediments.
Specifications: 5p.
294
-------
TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Soil
Cleanup Technologies
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Decontami-
nation, Super-fund, Waste management, Office of Solid
Waste and Emergency Response, Soil treatment.
1516 Interim Guidance on Establishing Soil Lead Cleanup
Levels at Superfund Sites. Supplement to Interim
Guidance on Establishing Soil Lead Cleanup Levels at
Superfund Sites
Order Number PB91-921352CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; 1990
The purpose of the directive (9355.4-02) is to set forth an in-
terim soil cleanup level for total lead, at 500 to 1000 ppm,
which the Office of Emergency and Remedial Response and
the Office of Waste Programs Enforcement consider protec-
tive for direct contact at residential settings. This range is to
be used at both Fund-lead and Enforcement-lead CERCLA
sites. Further guidance will be developed after the Agency
has developed a verified Cancer Potency Factor and/or a
Reference Dose for lead. The purpose of the directive
(9355.4-02A) is to reiterate that OSWER Directive 9355.4-02
is a guidance document and not a regulation. As is the case
with other guidance documents, the guidance should not be
used as a regulation.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $150 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $300). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 6p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management
Hazardous materials, Public health, Office of Solid Waste
and Emergency Response.
1517 International Evaluation of In-situ Biorestoration of
Contaminated Soil and Groundwater (September 1990)
Order Number PB93-207553CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 90
The philosophy of in-situ biorestoration is to stimulate the in-
digenous soil microorganisms to degrade contaminants ,by
improving the environmental conditions in the soil using a
water recirculation system. The objective of the project is to
show the possibilities for application of the technique in rela-
tion with contaminants, soil conditions and other site-specific
circumstances by means of integration and evaluation of re-
sults of in-situ biorestoration projects. The project is limited
to the Netherlands, West Germany and the USA. Experience
has especially been gained with in-situ biorestoration at hy-
drocarbon-contaminated petrol stations and industrial sites.
The system generally consists of a water recirculation
system, aboveground water treatment and conditioning of
the infiltrating water with nutrients and an oxygen source.
However, there is no one-and-only application method for in-
situ biorestoration. The remediation, which can last from ap-
proximately six months to several years, can reach residual
concentrations below the B-value of the Netherlands exami-
nation framework.
Specifications: Pub. in Proceedings of NATO/CCMS Inter-
national Conference, Demonstration of Remedial Action
Technologies for Contaminated Land and Groundwater (3rd),
Montreal, Canada, November 6-9, 1989. See also PB91-
143198. 30p.
.Subject index keywords: Remedial action, Soil contamina-
tion, Water pollution control, Ground water, Foreign technolo-
gy.
1518 Literature Review Summary of Metals Extraction
Processes Used to Remove Lead from Soils
Order Number PB94-140613CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
IT Corp., Cincinnati, OH.; Environmental Protection Agency,
Cincinnati, OH. Risk Reduction Engineering Lab; Jan 94
Numerous Superfund sites throughout the United States are
contaminated with toxic metals. Battery reclamation, lead
smelting, and lead-based paint manufacturing are examples
of processes that could result in lead-contaminated soils.
Metals, unlike many hazardous organic constituents, cannot
be degraded or readily detoxified. This report presents infor-
mation on metals extraction technologies that are currently in
various stages of development, soil characteristics that affect
metals extraction, chelating agents used in the soil washing
of lead-contaminated soils, and membranes used to separate
metal cations. The information presented in this report was
obtained from a literature search conducted to investigate
metals extraction processes for removing lead from soils.
Specifications: Sponsored by Environmental Protection
Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk Reduction Engineering Lab.
62p.
Subject index keywords: Soil treatment, Land pollution
control, Lead(Metal), Extraction, Remedial action.
1519 On-Site Engineering Report for the Low-
Temperature Thermal Desorption Pilot-Scale Test on
Contaminated Soil
Order Number PB92-216936CDH, price: PC A07/MF A02
IT Environmental Programs, Inc., Cincinnati, OH.; IT Corp.,
Knoxville, TN.*Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati,
OH. Risk Reduction Engineering Lab; Jul 92
Performance of the thermal desorption process for removal
of organic contaminants, mostly polynuclear aromatic hydro-
carbons (PAHs), from soils was evaluated. The Superfund
Site soil tested was a fine sandy soil contaminated with creo-
sote. An optimum operating temperature of 550 C and an op-
timum operating residence time of 10 min, determined from
bench studies, were used in the pilot-scale desorber. Con-
taminants removed from the soil were captured or destroyed
in the associated air pollution control equipment. Test results
showed that greater than 99% of the PAHs were removed
from the soil. The concentration of total PAHs averaged
4629 mg/Kg in the pretreated soils and were below detec-
tion in the posttreated soils.
Specifications: Prepared in cooperation with IT Corp.,
Knoxville, TN. Sponsored by Environmental Protection
Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk Reduction Engineering Lab.
134p.
Subject index keywords: Soil treatment, Land pollution
control, Thermal degradation, Desorption.
1520 On-Site Engineering Report of the Slurry-Phase
Biological Reactor for Pilot-Scale Testing on
Contaminated Soil
Order Number PB93-178259CDH, price: PC A09/MF A02
IT Environmental Programs, Inc., Cincinnati, OH.; ECOVA
Corp., Redmond, WA.*Environmental Protection Agency,
Cincinnati, OH. Risk Reduction Engineering Lab; Apr 93
A pilot-scale test of the slurry-phase bioremediation technol-
ogy was performed by ECOVA Corporation (ECOVA) at the
U.S. EPA Test and Evaluation (T&E) facility from May 8
through July 10, 1991 (12 weeks). The slurry-phase bioreac-
tors were tested on a creosote-contaminated soil from the
295
-------
TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Soil
Cleanup Technologies
Burlington Northern Superfund Site in Brainerd, Minnesota.
The results of the bench-scale study (performed by ECOVA
prior to the pilot-scale study) were used to optimize a pilot-
scale bioreactor system containing 64 liters of 30 percent
slurry (soihwater, w/v). The pilot-scale phase utilized an ino-
culum of indigenous polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbon (PAH)
degraders (9.3 x 10 to the 7th power per gram of soil), an
inorganic nitrogen supplement in the form of NH(4-)N, and a
media broth containing potassium, phosphate, magnesium,
calcium, and iron to achieve an overall reduction. During the
study, levels of sol-bound and liquid-phase PAHs, total pe-
troleum hydrocarbons (TPHs), nutrients, pH, dissolved
oxyg'e'h, temperature, toxicity, and microbial activity were
monitored.
Specifications: Prepared in cooperation with ECOVA Corp.,
Redmond, WA. Sponsored by Environmental Protection
Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk Reduction Engineering Lab.
185p.
Subject index keywords: Creosote, Soils, Bioreactors, Slur-
ries.
1521 On-Site Methods for Assessing Chemical Impact on
the poll Environment Using Earthworms: A Case Study
ai the Baird and McGuire Superfund Site, Holbrook,
Massachusetts
Order Number PB92-108166CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Corvallis Environmental Research Lab., OR.; Menzie-Cura
and Associates, Inc., Chelmsford, MA. NSI Technology
Services Corp., Corvallis, OR. Environmental Research Lab;
C199J
Five Lumbricus terrestns Linneaus were placed into enclo-
sures at a field site and evaluated after 7 d. The enclosures
were distributed in transects throughout areas of high and
low contamination and in a reference area. Observations of
earthworm responses for mortality, morbidity (coiling, stiffen-
ing, swelling, lesions) and whole body burden were com-
pared to chemical measurements in corresponding soil sam-
ples. Nine chemicals (DDT, DDE, ODD alpha chlordane,
gamma-chlordane, chlordene, gamma-chlordene, endrin,
nonachlor) were measured in the whole body of earthworms
and soil samples. Various levels of impact were described by
scoring earthworm responses from sampling locations
throughout the field site. A ranking of the sample locations
from low to high impact by the earthworm response variables
is directly correlated to the ranking of these locations for
concentrations of total chlordane and total DDT in corre-
spofiding soil samples. Results show acute toxicity to earth-
worms placed on-site and suggest that whole body concen-
trations could impact earthworm predators. In addition, the
on-site method eliminates the need to transport soils to off-
site laboratories, thus preventing subsequent disposal issues.
(Copyright (c) 1991 SETAC.)
Specifications: Pub. in Environmental Toxicology and
Chemistry, v10 p817-826 1991. Prepared in cooperation with
Menzie-Cura and Associates, Inc., Chelmsford, MA., and NSI
Technology Services Corp., Corvallis, OR. Environmental Re-
search Lab. 12p.
Subject index keywords: Land pollution, Biological indica-
tors, Pesticides, Environmental impact assessments, Anne-
lids, Chemical compounds.
1522 Pilot-Scale Incineration of Comtaminated Soils from
the Drake Chemical Superfund Site
Order Number PB93-163004CDH, price: PC A12/MF A03
Acurex Corp., Jefferson, AR. Incineration Research Facility.;
Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk
Reduction Engineering Lab; Mar 93
A series of pilot-scale incineration tests were performed at
the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA's) Inciner-
ation Research Facility to evaluate the potential of inciner-
ation as an option to treat contaminated soils from the Drake
Chemical Superfund site in Lock Haven, Pennsylvania. The
soils at the Drake site are reported to be contaminated to
varying degrees with various organic constituents and sever-
al hazardous constituent trace metals. The purpose of the
test program was to evaluate the incinerability of selected
site soils in terms of the destruction of contaminant organic
constituents and the fate of contaminant trace metals. All
tests were conducted in the rotary kiln incineration system at
the IRF. Test results show that greater than 99.995 percent
principal organic hazardous constituent (POHC) destruction
and removal efficiencies (DRE) can be achieved at kiln exit
gas temperatures of nominally 816 C (1,500 F) and 538 C
(1,000 F). Complete soil decontamination of semivolatile or-
ganics was achieved; however, kiln ash levels of three vola-
tile organic constituents remained comparable to soil levels.
Specifications: See also PB91-186965. Sponsored by Envi-
ronmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk Reduction
Engineering Lab. 272p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Incinerators, Land pol-
lution control, Soil treatment, Hazardous materials, Waste
disposal.
1523 Pilot-Scale Incineration of Contaminated Soil from
the Chemical Insecticide Corporation Superfund Site
Order Number PB93-155968CDH, price: PC A09/MF A02
Acurex Corp., Jefferson, AR.; Environmental Protection
Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk Reduction Engineering Lab;
Feb 93
An incineration test program was conducted at the U.S. Envi-
ronmental Protection Agency's Incinerator Research Facility
to evaluate the potential of incineration as an option to treat
contaminated soils at the Chemical Insecticide Corporation
Site. The test data show that: The organochlorine pesticides
were destroyed to non-detectable quantities in the ash, the
state-of-the-art scrubber removed arsenic to the 99.95%
level, lime addition did not improve the arsenic removal effi-
ciency, toxicity characteristic leaching procedure (TCLP)
values for ash metals varied, lime addition reduced TCLP
leachability of metals, particulate and HCI levels were within
accepted limits. Incineration data that can be used for other
purposes was also collected for the soil tested.
Specifications: See also PB92-193382. Sponsored by Envi-
ronmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk Reduction
Engineering Lab. 192p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Soil treatment, Inciner-
ation, Air pollution control, Insecticides, Metals.
296
-------
TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION; Soil
Cleanup Technologies
1524 Presentations EPA-State Soil Standards Conference.
Held in Crystal City, Virginia on January 29, 1991
Order Number PB92-963350CDH, price: PC A08/MF A02
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Jan 92
The first U.S. EPA-sponsored national conference on estab-
lishing soil cleanup criteria that would be protective of
ground-water quality was held on January 29, 1991. Included
in the publication are questions and answers from panel dis-
cussions, as well as text from the presentations.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 162p.
Subject index keywords: Soils, Water pollution standards,
Ground water, Hazardous materials, Meetings, Superfund,
Cleanup.
1525 Prospects for In situ Chemical Treatment for
Contaminated Soil
Order Number PB92-126929CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk
Reduction Engineering Lab; Dec 91
Treating large volumes of contaminated soil at Superfund
sites is costly. These factors have led the U.S. EPA's Super-
fund Program to consider in situ chemical treatment as an al-
ternative technology for treatment of contaminated soil. Oxi-
dation, reduction, neutralization, hydrolysis, dehalogenation,
and UV/photolysis are chemical processes currently used for
above-ground treatment. Temperature, physical and chemical
characteristics of soil, are some operating parameters that
control the effectiveness of these processes. Improvements
in mixing treatment materials in soil, and methods for recov-
ering unreacted material reaction products, are needed to
allow wider application of these treatments in situ. Excalibur
catalytic ozone technology, Exxon and Rio Linda cyanide de-
struction, and Trinity ultrasonic detoxification are innovative
technologies that are being considered.
Specifications: See also PB87-146007. Presented at
HMCRI's Annual National Conference and Exhibition (12th),
Washington, DC., December 3-5, 1991. 9p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Soil proper-
ties, Waste treatment, In situ treatment, Superfund.
1526 Rationale for the Assessment of Errors in the
Sampling of Soils
Order Number PB90-242306CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
Environmental Monitoring Systems Lab., Las Vegas, NV.;
Nevada Univ., Las Vegas. Environmental Research Center;
Jul90
The sampling of soils in RCRA and Superfund monitoring
programs requires associated quality assurance programs.
One objective of any quality assurance program is to assess
and document the quality of the study data to ensure that it
satisfies the needs of the users. The purpose of the docu-
ment is to describe the nature and function of certain quality
assurance samples in the assessment and documentation of
bias and precision in sampling studies of inorganic pollutant
concentrations in soils. The document has been developed
to provide people who plan, implement, or oversee RCRA or
Superfund soil sampling studies with information on quality
assessment samples so that they will have a better basis for
decisions concerning the employment of such samples in
their quality assurance programs.
Specifications: Prepared in cooperation with Nevada Univ.,
Las Vegas. Environmental Research Center. 66p.
Subject index keywords: Soils, Sampling, Quality assur-
ance.
1527 Reductive Dehalogenation of Organic Contaminants
in Soils and Ground Water. Ground Water Issue
Order Number PB91-191056CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Robert S. Kerr Environmental Research Lab., Ada, OK; Jan
91
Introduction and large scale production of synthetic haloge-
nated organic chemicals over the last 50 years has resulted
in a group of contaminants which tend to persist in the envi-
ronment and resist both biotic and abiotic degradation. The
low solubility of these types of contaminants, along with their
toxicity and tendency to accumulate in food chains, make
them particularly relevant targets for remediation activities.
Although the processes involved in dechlorination of many of
these organic compounds are well understood in the fields of
chemistry and microbiology, technological applications of
these processes to environmental remediation are relatively
new-particularly at pilot or field scale. It is well established,
however, that there are several mechanisms which result in
dehalogenation of some classes of organic contaminants,
often rendering them less offensive environmentally. These
include; stimulation of metabolic sequences through introduc-
tion of electron donor and acceptor combinations; addition of
nutrients to meet the needs of dehalogenating microorga-
nisms; possible use of engineered micro-organisms; and use
of enzyme systems capable of catalyzing reductive dehalo-
genation.
Specifications: 15p.
Subject index keywords: Land pollution control, Water pol-
lution control, Remedial action, Superfund, Waste disposal,
Dehalogenation.
1528 Regional Guide: Issuing Site-Specific Treatability
Variances for Contaminated Soils and Debris from Land
Disposal Restrictions (LDRs)
Order Number PB92-963284CDH, price: PC A01/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Jan 92
The fact sheet highlights the delegation of land disposal re-
strictions (LDR) site-specific treatability variances to regional
offices by describing both the procedures and requirements
for issuance.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 4p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
Hazardous materials, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
Response.
1529 Remediation of Contaminated Soils by Solvent
Flushing
Order Number PB94-162740CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Florida Univ., Gainesville. Dept. of Soil and Water Science.;
Robert S. Kerr Environmental Research Lab., Ada,
OK.*Electric Power Research Inst, Palo Alto, CA; C1994
Solvent flushing is a potential technique for remediating a
waste disposal/spill site contaminated with organic chemi-
cals. This technique involves the injection of a solvent mix-
297
-------
TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Soil
Cleanup Technologies
ture (e.g., water plus alcohols) that enhances contaminant
solubility, reduces the retardation factor, and increases the
release rates of the contaminants. A simulation model is de-
veloped to predict contaminant elution curves during solvent
flushing for the case of one-dimensional, steady flow through
a contaminated medium. Column experiments are conducted
with a Eustis fine sand that is initially equilibrated with an
aqueous naphthalene solution, and then eluted with different
methanol-water mixtures to remove the naphthalene. The
model simulations, based on parameter values estimated
from literature data agree well with the measured elution pro-
files, Solvent flushing experiments, where the soil was initially
equilibrated with a solution of naphthalene and anthracene,
show that compounds with different retardation factors are
separated at low cqsolvent contents, while coelution of the
compounds occurs at higher contents. (Copyright (c) ASCE
1994.)
Specifications: Pub. in Jnl. of Environmental Engineering,
V120hi p42-57 Jah/Feb 94. See also PB92-180025 and
PB92-180074. Sponsored by Robert S. Kerr Environmental
Research Lab., Ada, OK. and Electric Power Research Inst.,
Palo Alto, CA,18p.
Subject index keywords: Waste disposal, Volatile organic
compounds, Ground water, Water pollution control, Super-
fund.
1530 Removal of Creosote from Soil by Thermal
Desorptlon
Order Number PB92:126838CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
International Technology Corp., Knoxville, TN.; Environmental
Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk Reduction
Engineering Lab; 1991
Performance of the thermal desorption process for removal
of organic contaminants, mostly polynuclear aromatic hydro-
carbons (PAHs), from soils was evaluated. A Superfund Site
Soil that was contaminated with creosote was tested. An op-
erating temperature of 550 C and an operating residence
time of 10 minutes at temperature, determined from bench
studies, were used in the pilot scale desorber. Test results
showed that greater than 99% of the PAHs were removed
from the test sop. The concentrations of total PAHs in the
soil before and after treatment averaged 4629 mg/kg and
below detection limits respectively.
Specifications: See also PB91-228080. Proceedings of
HMCRI's Annual National Conference and Exhibition (12th),
Washington, DC., December 3-5, 1991, p362-368. Sponsored
by Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk
Reduction Engineering Lab. 9p.
Subject index keywords: Soil treatment, Hazardous materi-
als. Creosote, Thermal environments, Desorption.
1531 Removal of Radionuclides by Electrokinetic Soil
Processing
Order Number PB93-222875CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Prqt§ctipQ Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk
Reduction Engineering Lab; c1993
Electrokinetics promises to be an innovative treatment proc-
ess for in-situ treatment of soils and groundwater contami-
nated with heavy metals and radionuclides. Electrokinetics
refers to the movement of ionic liquids and charged particles
relative to one another under the action of an applied direct
current electric field. The paper summarizes the results of
laboratory tests for the removal of uranium, thorium, and
radium, conducted from February 28, 1991 to March 30,
1991 and a review of progress to date.
Specifications: Pub. in Jnl. of the National Technical Asso-
ciation, v66 n2 p43-46 Spring 1993. 6p.
Subject index keywords: Radioactive materials, Electrokin-
etics, Soil contamination.
1532 Soil Washing Treatment
Order Number PB91-228056CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Science Applications International Corp., Cincinnati, OH.;
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 90
Soil washing is a water-based process for mechanically
scrubbing soils ex-situ to remove undesirable contaminants.
The process removes contaminants from soils in one of two
ways: by dissolving or suspending them in the wash solution
(which is later treated by conventional wastewater treatment
methods) or by concentrating them into a smaller volume of
soil through simple particle size separation techniques (simi-
lar to those used in sand and gravel operations). Soil wash-
ing systems incorporating both removal techniques offer the
greatest promise for application to soils contaminated with a
wide variety of heavy metal and organic contaminants. The
concept of reducing soil contamination through the use of
particle size separation is based on the finding that most or-
ganic and inorganic contaminants tend to bind, either chemi-
cally or physically, to clay and silt soil particles. At the
present time, soil washing is used extensively in Europe and
has had limited use in the United States. During 1986-1989,
the technology was one of the selected source control reme-
dies at eight Superfund sites. The bulletin provides informa-
tion on the technology applicability, the types of residuals re-
sulting from the use of the technology, the latest perform-
ance data, site requirements, the status of the technology,
and where to go for further information.
Specifications: Sponsored by Environmental Protection
Agency, Washington, DC. Office of Emergency and Remedial
Response. 13p.
Subject index keywords: Soil treatment, Washing, Waste
management, Soil washing]
1533 Summary of Treatment Technology Effectiveness
for Contaminated Soil
Order Number PB92-963351CDH, price: PC A23/MF A04
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Jun 90
The document presents the results of a study conducted by
the Office of Emergency and Remedial Response that col-
lected soil treatment data and analyzed the effectiveness of
treatment technologies on contaminant treatability groups.
The document presents the recommendations developed for
the treatment of contaminated soil.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 532p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Soils, Waste
treatment, Superfund, Remedial response.
298
Hilllli. if j! ..illlii,i i, I,,
-------
TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION- Soil
Cfeanup Technologies
1534 Superfund Engineering Issue: Considerations for
Evaluating the Impact of Metals Partitioning during the
Incineration of Contaminated Soils from Superfund Sites
Order Number PB93-121341CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Science Applications International Corp., Cincinnati, OH.;
Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk
Reduction Engineering Lab; Sep 92
A significant amount of research has been conducted on the
incineration of contaminated materials. Although historically
the primary focus has been on the destruction of organics,
increased emphasis is being placed in the fate of metals.
Unlike the organic portion, the metal fraction may change
form but is not destroyed. Metals can remain with the ash
when discharged from the primary combustion chamber.
They can also volatilize or oxidize to form fumes or fine par-
ticulates and pass through the incineration system. Metal
vapors, fumes, or particles can be collected by the APCDs,
exit out the stack, or be deposited along the walls of the
combustion chamber and remain in the incineration system.
Potential pathways for metals are illustrated. This distribution
of metals into the various incinerator system components is
called 'partitioning.' A number of factors affect how various
metals will partition, or behave, during incineration.
Specifications: See also PB89-233423, PB90-132812 and
PB90-186339. Sponsored by Environmental Protection
Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk Reduction Engineering Lab.
17p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Incinerators, Metals,
Soil treatment, Waste management, Metal partitioning.
1535 Superfund Engineering Issue: Treatment of Lead-
Contaminated Soils
Order Number PB91-921291CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Apr 91
The bulletin summarizes the contents of a seminar on treat-
ment of lead-contaminated soils presented on Aug. 28, 1990,
to Region V Superfund and RCRA personnel by members of
EPA's Engineering and Treatment Technology Support
Center located in the Risk Reduction Engineering Laboratory
(RREL) in Cincinnati, Ohio. The bulletin is intended to sum-
marize the information presented during the seminar and it
should not be viewed as a definitive treatise on lead treat-
ment technologies.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 11 p.
Subject index keywords: Lead(Metal), Hazardous materials,
Waste treatment, Meetings, Superfund.
1536 Superfund Soils Data Management System
Order Number PB92-139476CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
COM Federal Programs Corp., Fairfax, VA.; Environmental
Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk Reduction
Engineering Lab; 1992
The paper describes the Superfund Soil Data Management
System (DMS), a PC-based data system being developed by
the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) in its effort
to manage and evaluate treatment and performance data for
contaminated soil, sludge, and debris. The system will be
used to support two basic EPA objectives: (1) technology
transfer; and (2) support for the development of RCRA land
disposal restrictions (LDRs) for contaminated soil and debris.
COM Federal Programs Corporation is supporting EPA in the
development of this data base. EPA is compiling and evalu-
ating soil, sludge, and debris treatment data from a variety of
sources such as: EPA Superfund remedial and removal ac-
tions, RCRA and UST corrective actions, SITE program dem-
onstrations, and other research programs; Department of
Energy (DOE); Department of Defense (DOD); treatment ven-
dors; private contractors; and research organizations. This
influx of data has created the information management need
addressed by the Superfund Soil DMS. Written in dBASE
III— (a popular PC-based data base language), the Super-
fund Soil DMS stores: Quantitative and qualitative data on
ex-situ soil, sludge, and debris treatment technologies, Qual-
ity control (QC) data (such as blank, spike recoveries, surro-
gate recoveries, etc.), Bibliographic and site information, and
Abstracts and extensive comments regarding treatment per-
formance, successes and problems, design and operating in-
formation, and recommendations for additional research.
Specifications: Presented at HMCRI Annual National Con-
ference and Exhibition (12th), Washington, DC., December 3-
5, 1991. Sponsored by Environmental Protection Agency,
Cincinnati, OH. Risk Reduction Engineering Lab. 7p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
Data base management, Information systems, Superfund
Soils Data Management System.
1537 Technical Background Document for Draft Soil
Screening Level Guidance
Order Number PB94-963503CDH, price: Standing Order, call
for price
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Mar 94
The document provides technical details of the derivation of
the September 30, 1993, draft Soil Screening Levels (SSLs)
Guidance for Superfund (PB93-963508). The document is
presented in two sections. Section I defines SSL and pro-
vides background information on the development of SSLs
and their application and implementation at Superfund sites,
including sampling schemes for measuring SSL attainment. It
also provides draft SSLs developed for 30 chemicals. Sec-
tion II provides the technical basis for the development of
SSLs addressing direct ingestion of soil, inhalation of vola-
tiles and fugitive dust, and the soil-to-ground-water exposure
pathway, including the assumptions and theories used the
their development.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required ($100 U.S., Canada, and Mexico; all
others $200). Single copies also available in paper copy or
microfiche. 324p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Hazardous materials,
Soil contamination.
1538 Technology Demonstration Summary: Bio Trol Soil
Washing System for Treatment of a Wood Preserving
Site
Order Number PB92-224393CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk
Reduction Engineering Lab; Mar 92
The Superfund Innovative Technology Evaluation (SITE) Pro-
gram was instituted in 1986 to promote the development and
application of innovative technologies to the remediation of
Superfund and other sites contaminated with hazardous
wastes. The Project Summary highlights the results of an
299
-------
TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Soil
Cleanup Technologies
evaluation of a specific arrangement of the three technol-
ogies of the BSWS. The system consists of multiple stages
of physical abrasion, attrition, flotation, and washing of exca-
vated soil In the BSW. The site selected for the evaluation is
a wood preserving facility in New Brighton, MM, where creo-
sote and pentachlqrophenol were used for several decades.
Specifications: See also PB92-115245. 7p.
Subject Index keywords: Superfund, Hazardous materials,
Remedial action, Soil treatment, Waste management, BioTrol
soil washing system.
1539 Technology Evaluation Report: Biotrol Soil Washing
System for Treatment of a Wood Preserving Site.
Volume 1
Order Number PB92-115310CDH, price: PC A13/MF A03
Science Applications International Corp., McLean, VA.;
Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk
Reduction Engineering Lab; Dec 91
The report presents and evaluates the extensive database
from the SITE Program demonstration at the MacGillis and
Gibbs; wood treatment facility in New Brighton, MN. Soil
washing and segregation, biotreatment of contaminated proc-
ess water, and biodegradation of a slurry of the contaminat-
ed fines from the soil washing were evaluated over several
weeks of operation. The contaminants of concern were pen-
tachlorophenol (penta) and polynuclear aromatic hydrocar-
bons (PAHs). The results indicate that the soil washer effec-
tively segregates contaminated soil into coarse, relatively un-
oontamlnated sand constituting the largest output fraction
and a much smaller fraction of fine clay/silt particles retain-
ing about 30% of the original contamination. Penta removal
efficiency from the feed soil is 87%-89% (vendor's claim:
90%). Contaminated woody material is also segregated.
Operational variations and their impact on output qualities
and quantities are described. Biotreatment of process water
from the soil washing successfully degraded 91-94% of the
penta. The results for the slurry biological treatment of the
contaminated fines indicated that >90% removal of penta
and PAHs probably can be achieved with a fully acclimated
system operating at steady state. Combined operating and
capital equipment cost for an integrated system are estimat-
ed tQ.be $168/ton of soil treated. Incineration of the woody
debris is a ma|or cost factor. Costs are also presented by
process since specific applications may require different con-
figurations of the three units.
Specifications: Also available in set of 3 reports, PC E99/
MF E99, PB92-115302. See also Volume 2, Part A, PB92-
115328. Sponsored by Environmental Protection Agency,
Cincinnati, QH. Risk Reduction Engineering Lab. 276p.
Subject index keywords: Soil treatment, Land pollution
control, Waste management, Wood preservatives, Biological
treatment, Superfund, Soil washing, BioTrol soil washing
system.
1540 Technology Evaluation Report: Biotrol Soil Washing
System for treatment of a Wood Preserving Site.
Volume 2, Part A
Order Number PB92-115328CDH, price: PC A17/MF A04
Science Applications International Corp., McLean, VA.;
Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk
Reduction Engineering Lab; Dec 91
The SITE Program demonstration of one configuration of the
BioTfol Soil Washing System (BSWS) was conducted to
obtain reliable performance and cost data that can be used
to evaluate the potential applicability of the technology as a
remediation alternative for sites contaminated with hazardous
wastes. The BSWS treatment train used in the study consists
of three technologies: a soil washer; an aqueous treatment
system; and a slurry bio-reactor. The demonstration was car-
ried out at the MacGillis and Gibbs Superfund site in New
Brighton, MN. The report analyzes the results from the SITE
demonstration. It includes discussion of the operation of the
three separate treatment technologies (SW, SBR, and BATS)
evaluated in the test and provides flow diagrams, a summary
of the sampling and analytical programs, an economic analy-
sis, and a quality assurance/quality control evaluation of the
data. The volume, consisting of several appendices, presents
key analytical data and the quality control and quality assur-
ance studies that were carried out as part of the demonstra-
tion evaluation. Additional supporting data is archieved in
EPA's Edison, New Jersey laboratory.
Specifications: Also available in set of 3 reports PC E99/
MF E99, PB92-115302. See also Volume 1, PB92-115310
and Volume 2, Part B, PB92-115336. Sponsored by Environ-
mental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk Reduction
Engineering Lab. 387p.
Subject index keywords: Soil treatment, Land pollution
control, Waste management, Wood preservatives, Biological
treatment, Superfund, Soil washing, BioTrol soil washing
system.
1541 Technology Evaluation Report: Biotrol Soil Washing
System for Treatment of a Wood Preserving Site.
Volume 2, Part B
Order Number PB92-115336CDH, price: PC A15/MF A03
Science Applications International Corp., McLean, VA.;
Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk
Reduction Engineering Lab; Dec 91
The SITE Program demonstration of one configuration of the
BioTrol Soil Washing System (BSWS) was conducted to
obtain reliable performance and cost data that can be used
to evaluate the potential applicability of the technology as a
remediation alternative for sites contaminated with hazardous
wastes. The BSWS treatment train used in the study consists
of three technologies: a soil washer; an aqueous treatment
system; and a slurry bio-reactor. The demonstration was car-
ried out at the MacGillis and Gibbs Superfund site in New
Brighton, MN. The report analyzes the results from the SITE
demonstration. It Includes discussion of the operation of the
three separate treatment technologies (SW, SBR, and BATS)
evaluated in the test and provides flow diagrams, a summary
of the sampling and analytical programs, an economic analy-
sis, and a quality assurance/quality control evaluation of the
data. Conclusions were reached concerning the technology's
suitability for use in remediations involving both similar and
different materials at other sites.
Specifications: Also available in set of 3 reports PC E99/
MF E99, PB92-115302. See also Volume 2, Part A, PB92-
115328. Sponsored by Environmental Protection Agency,
Cincinnati, OH. Risk Reduction Engineering Lab. 334p.
Subject index keywords: Soil treatment, Land pollution
control, Waste management, Wood preservatives, Biological
treatment, Superfund, Soil washing, BioTrol soil washing
system.
300
-------
TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Soil
Cleanup Technologies
1542 Technology Evaluation Report: Pilot-Scale
Demonstration of a Slurry-Phase Biological Reactor for
Creosote-Contaminated Soil. Volume 1
Order Number PB93-205532CDH, price: PC A09/MF A02
IT Corp., Cincinnati, OH.; Environmental Protection Agency,
Cincinnati, OH. Risk Reduction Engineering Lab; Mar 93
The report documents a pilot-scale test of a slurry-phase bio-
logical reactor for treatment of creosote-contaminated soil.
The technology used was a reactor system in which an
aqueous slurry of soil was mixed with appropriate nutrients
and seeded with micro-organisms to enhance the biodegra-
dation process. In the 12-wk study, a creosote-contaminated
soil from the Burlington Northern Superfund Site in Brainerd,
MN, was used to test the slurry-phase reactors. The results
of a previously-performed bench-scale study were used to
optimize a pilot-scale reactor system. Each reactor contained
64 I of 30% slurry (soil: water, w/v). The pilot-scale phase
utilized an inoculum of indigenous polynuclear aromatic hy-
drocarbon (PAH) degraders (9.3 x 10 to the 7th power CPU/
g of soil), an inorganic nitrogen supplement in the form of
NH4(-N), and a media broth containing potassium, phos-
phate, magnesium, calcium, and iron. The reduction of total
PAHs exceeded 87%. The report presents detailed informa-
tion concerning the operation, sampling and analysis, and re-
sults achieved with the pilot-scale slurry-phase bioremedia-
tion system.
Specifications: See also PB92-129683. Sponsored by Envi-
ronmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk Reduction
Engineering Lab. 181 p.
Subject index keywords: Biological treatment, Creosote,
Soils, Superfund, Waste treatment.
1543 Technology Evaluation Report: Toronto Harbour
Commissioners (THC) Soil Recycle Treatment Train
Order Number PB93-216067CDH, price: PC A07/MF A02
Science Applications International Corp., Buffalo, NY.;
Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk
Reduction Engineering Lab; Jul 93
The report summarizes the results and activities of the dem-
onstration testing of Toronto Harbor Commissioners (THC)
Soil Recycle Treatment Train. The Demonstration was con-
ducted at a site within the Port Industrial District (PID) in To-
ronto, Ontario, Canada under the Superfund Innovative Tech-
nology Evaluation (SITE) Program developed by the U.S. En-
vironmental Protection Agency (EPA). The demonstration ex-
amined a part of THC's on-going evaluation of the treatment
train during the first nine months of 1992. EPA elected to
sample the process during the processing of Soil B, which
based on field sampling, was expected to exhibit relatively
high organic (oil and grease, PAH compounds) and inorganic
(heavy metals) contaminants.
Specifications: Sponsored by Environmental Protection
Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk Reduction Engineering Lab.
148p.
Subject index keywords: Land pollution control, Chemical
treatment, Biological treatment, Toronto(Canada).
1544 Toronto Harbour Commissioners (THC) Soil Recycle
Treatment Train. Applications Analysis Report
Order Number PB94-124674CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
Science Applications International Corp., Cincinnati, OH.;
Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk
Reduction Engineering Lab; Apr 93
This project consists of a demonstration of the Toronto Har-
bour Commissioners (THC) Soil Recycle Treatment Train.
The treatment train consists of three processes. The first
process utilizes an attrition soil wash process to separate rel-
atively uncontaminated soil from a more heavily contaminat-
ed fine slurry. The contaminated fine slurry is then further
processed in a metals removal process or a bioslurry reactor
process or both to remove organic contaminants and heavy
metals contamination. The Toronto Harbour Commissioners
conducted a long-term evaluation of this treatment train at a
55 tons per day pilot plant at 185 Cherry Street in the port of
Toronto, located in Toronto, Ontario, Canada. The Superfund
Innovative Technology Evaluation (SITE) Program conducted
a demonstration project that examined in detail the process-
ing of soil from one of the sites being evaluated in the over-
all project. The goals of this study were to evaluate the tech-
nical effectiveness and economics of a treatment process
sequence and to assess the potential applicability of the
process to other wastes and/or other Superfund and hazard-
ous waste sites.
Specifications: See also PB93-216067. Sponsored by Envi-
ronmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk Reduction
Engineering Lab. 68p.
Subject index keywords: Soil treatment, Waste treatment,
Hazardous materials, Superfund, Foreign technology, Innova-
tive treatment technologies, Soil washing, Soil Recycle Treat-
ment Train.
1545 Toxic Treatments 'In-situ' Steam/Hot-Air Stripping
Technology. Applications Analysis Report
Order Number PB91-181768CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Science Applications International Corp., San Diego, CA.;
Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk
Reduction Engineering Lab; Mar 91
A SITE Demonstration of the Toxic Treatment (USA) Inc. in-
situ steam/hot-air stripping technology (Detoxifier) was con-
ducted beginning in the fall of 1989 at the GATX Annex Ter-
minal site located in San Pedro, CA. The chemical storage
and transfer facility was contaminated with various solvents
due to spillage and a fire. Contamination extended into the
salt water table (1.8 meters). Based on the SITE Demonstra-
tion and other data, it was concluded that 85% of the volatile
organic compounds and 50% of the semivolatile organic
compounds were removed from the soil. Fugitive air emis-
sions are very low, and lateral and downward migration of
contaminants due to the treatment were minimal. Finally, it
was concluded that this in-situ process is cost competitive.
Specifications: Sponsored by Environmental Protection
Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk Reduction Engineering Lab.
49p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Soil treatment, Land
pollution control, Waste management, Stripping, Remedial
action, TTUSA process.
301
-------
TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION:
Solidification Technologies
1546 Toxlcity Bioassay and Eluate Heavy Metals Analysis
Results of the Bench Scale Stabilization Study of Soils
from the United Chrome Superfund NPL (National
Priority List) Site Corvallis, Oregon
Order Number PB90-120049CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Corvallis Environmental Research Lab., OR; Oct 89
In support of Environmental Protection Agency Region 10
and their United Chrome studies, the staff at Environmental
Research Laboratory-Corvallis performed toxicity bioassays
and selected chemical analyses. Direct toxicity tests (i.e.
using soil as the medium) and indirect toxicity tests (i.e. using
eluates obtained from the samples) were performed. The
report presents test results for toxicity bioassays and chemi-
cal analyses for heavy metals.
Specifications: 21 p.
Subject index keywords: Metals, Toxicity, Chemical analy-
sis, Chromium, Soil contamination, Superfund program,
BencJi-scale experiments.
1547 Treatment of Nonhazardous Petroleum-
Contaminated Soils by Thermal Desorption Technologies
Order Number PB94:135118CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Focus Environmental, Ina, Knoxville, TN.; Foster Wheeler
Envifesponse, Inc., Edison, NJ.*Environmental Protection
Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk Reduction Engineering Lab;
Nov 93
Spills, leaks, and accidental discharges of petroleum prod-
ucts have contaminated soil at thousands of sites in the
United States. One remedial action technique for treating pe-
troleum contaminated soil is the use of thermal desorption
technologies. The paper describes the types, mechanical
and operating characteristics of thermal desorption technol-
ogies that are commercially available to treat petroleum-con-
taminated soils. It also provides step-by-step procedures to
rate the critical success factors influencing the general appli-
cability of thermal desorption at a particular site. Key factors
that determine process economics are identified, and esti-
mated cost ranges for treating petroleum-contaminated soils
are presented. Spreadsheets are provided that can be used
for performing cost analyses for specific applications.
Specifications: Pub. in Jnl. of the Air and Waste Manage-
ment Association, v43 p1512-1525 Nov 93. Prepared in co-
operation with Foster Wheeler Enviresponse, Inc., Edison,
NJ. Sponsored by Environmental Protection Agency, Cincin-
nati, OH. Risk Reduction Engineering Lab. 14p.
Subject index keywords: Petroleum products, Chemical
spills, Superfund.
1548 Will Soil Working Work for the Sand Creek
Superfund Site
Order Number PB94-112828CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Foster Wheeler Energy Corp., Livingston, NJ.; Environmental
Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk Reduction
Engineering Lab; 1993
The 1987 Sand Creek Operable Unit 5 Record of Decision
(ROD) Identified soil washing as the selected remedy to re-
mediate soils contaminated with high levels of organochlor-
Ine pesticides, 2, 4-D herbicides and metals. Twenty-three
experimental runs were conducted over a two week period in
late September 1992, using a pilot scale device called the
Volume Reduction Unit (VRU). The experimental design eval-
uated the effect of two wash temperatures, two pH levels,
three surfactant types and four surfactant concentrations,
and two liquid to soil ratios on the contaminant removal effi-
ciency of the soil washing process. Site soils from three
depth classifications were used in the study.
Specifications: Presented at the Hazardous Waste Re-
search Conference, Manhattan, Kansas, May 25-26, 1993.
Sponsored by Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati,
OH. Risk Reduction Engineering Lab. 13p.
Subject index keywords: Pesticides, Land pollution control,
Superfund, Soil washing.
1549 X-ray Fluorescence Survey of Lead Contaminated
Residential Soils in Leadville, Colorado: A Case Study
Order Number PB93-203156CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Lockheed Environmental Systems and Technologies Co., Las
Vegas, NV.; Nevada Univ., Las Vegas. Harry Reid Center for
Environmental Studies.*Environmental Monitoring Systems
Lab., Las Vegas, NV; Mar 93
The California Gulch Superfund Site in Leadville, Colorado
was added to the National Priority List (NPL) in 1983. It is an
historic mining and smelting site that is currently the focus of
extensive studies on soil lead contamination and bioavailabi-
lity. Studies of ground and surface water impacts are also in
progress. Personnel from the Environmental Protection
Agencies (EPA) Environmental Monitoring Systems Laborato-
ry at Las Vegas (EMSL-LV), the Denver office of Roy F.
Weston, Inc., and Geostat Systems, Inc. (GSI) used field-
portable X-ray fluorescence (FPXRF) to determine the spatial
distribution of lead concentrations in residential soils. The
report details the FPXRF program sample collection, prepa-
ration, and analysis procedures, database management, and
program quality assurance efforts at Leadville. The program
clearly demonstrates that small, field portable XRF instru-
mentation can produce large quantities of acceptable quality
data in a timely and cost-efficient manner when used proper-
ly.
Specifications: Prepared in cooperation with Nevada Univ.,
Las Vegas. Harry Reid Center for Environmental Studies.
Sponsored by Environmental Monitoring Systems Lab., Las
Vegas, NV. 31 p.
Subject index keywords: Lead(Metal), X-ray fluorescence
analysis, Soil contamination.
TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM
IMPLEMENTATION: Solidification
Technologies
1550 Applications Analysis Report: Silicate Technology
Corporation's Solidification/Stabilization Technology for
Organic and Inorganic Contaminants in Soils
Order Number PB93-172948CDH, price: PC A07/MF A02
PRC Environmental Management, Inc., McLean, VA.;
Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk
Reduction Engineering Lab; Dec 92
The STC demonstration was conducted under EPA's Super-
fund Innovative Technology Evaluation (SITE) Program in
November, 1990, at the Selma Pressure Treating (SPT)
wood preserving site in Selma, California. The SPT site was
contaminated with both organics, predominantly pentachloro-
phenol (PCP), inorganics, mainly arsenic, chromium, and
copper. Extensive sampling and analyses were performed on
the waste both before and after treatment to compare physi-
cal, chemical, and leaching characteristics of raw and treated
302
lllltilhLlilii '.JiPI'l ;,iiiii',v'!,!l.ii',i,
-------
TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION:
Solidification Technologies
wastes. STC's contaminated soil treatment process was
evaluated based on contaminant mobility measured by nu-
merous leaching tests, structural integrity of the solidified ma-
terial, measured by physical and engineering tests and mor-
phological examinations; and economic analysis, using cost
information supplied by STC and the results of the SITE
demonstration, the vendor's design and test data, and other
laboratory and field applications of the technology. It dis-
cusses the advantages, disadvantages, and limitations, as
well as estimated costs of the technology.
Specifications: See also PB93-131787. Sponsored by Envi-
ronmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk Reduction
Engineering Lab. 150p.
Subject index keywords: Soil treatment, Solidification, Sta-
bilization, Hazardous materials, Waste treatment, Silicate
Technology Corporation.
1551 Chemfix Technologies, Inc. Solidification/
Stabilization Process. Application Analysis Report
Order Number PB91-187054CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
PRC Environmental Management, Inc., Chicago, IL;
Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk
Reduction Engineering Lab; May 91
The Chemfix Solidification/Stabilization treatment process
was evaluated under EPA's SITE program. The process re-
duced leaching levels of lead and copper. Physical testing
results were acceptable. Appropriate applications and proc-
ess limitations are discussed in the report.
Specifications: Sponsored by Environmental Protection
Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk Reduction Engineering Lab.
44p.
Subject index keywords: Solidification, Stabilization, Super-
fund, Waste treatment, Hazardous materials, Chemfix proc-
ess, Superfund Innovative Technology Evaluation Program.
1552 Description of EPA SITE Demonstration of the
HAZCON Stabilization Process at the Douglassville,
Pennsylvania Superfund Site
Order Number PB90-216334CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk
Reduction Engineering Lab; c1989
One technology field tested under the SITE research pro-
gram was the HAZCON stabilization process. This process
treats the waste by mixing it with Portland cement, water (if
needed) and chloranan, a proprietary chemical. By compar-
ing the chemical and physical properties of the waste before
and after treatment, this field demonstration developed data
on the strength and leaching potential expected after treat-
ment from a range of waste characteristics. Six wastes at the
Douglassville, PA Superfund Site, containing up to 25% or-
ganics and 2% lead, were treated and evaluated. The physi-
cal strength (200 to 1500 psi) and durability, i.e., long-term
stability, of the stabilized wastes were good. Even in wastes
with high levels of organics (25%), stabilization of lead was
very successful. Leaching results determined that lead con-
centrations dropped by factors between 100 and 1000 after
treatment. Stabilization of organics, however, achieved mixed
results. Leachate concentrations generally did not change
between treated and untreated samples. It could not be de-
termined if this was a failure of the treatment process or an
anomaly of the test procedure. (Copyright (c) 1989 AJr &
Waste Management Association.)
Specifications: Pub. in Jnl. of the Air and Waste Manage-
ment Association, p282-286 Mar 89. 8p.
Subject index keywords: Waste treatment, Stabilization,
Solidification, Hazardous materials, Superfund Innovative
Technology Evaluation, Encapsulation, Land pollution, Clean-
up operations.
1553 EPA SITE Demonstration of the International Waste
Technologies/Geo-Con In situ Stabilization/Solidification
Process
Order Number PB91-171686CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk
Reduction Engineering Lab.; Foster Wheeler Enviresponse,
Inc., Edison, NJ; cNov 90
The paper presents an EPA evaluation of the first field dem-
onstration of an in situ stabilization/solidification process for
contaminated soil under the EPA Superfund Innovative Tech-
nology Evaluation (SITE) program. Demonstration of the
process was a joint effort of two vendors: International
Waste Technologies' (IWT) of Wichita, Kansas, who provided
the treatment process, specifically the proprietary additive
called HWT-20, and Geo-Con, Inc., of Pittsburgh, Pennsylva-
nia, who provided both engineering and hardware for the in
situ soil treatment. The field demonstration took place in
April, 1988 at a site contaminated mainly with polychlorinated
biphenyls (PCBs). EPA tested the soil before and after treat-
ment and the EPA evaluation of the process is based on re-
sults from the testing. A year later, in April 1989, EPA tested
again the treated soil and results of that testing were com-
pared to those of the demonstration. Results of the EPA
evaluation of the IWT process, the Geo-Con performance,
and treatment costs are discussed separately. (Copyright (c)
. 1990~Air & Waste Management Association.)
Specifications: Pub. in Jnl. of Air and Waste Management
Association, v40 n11 p1569-1576 Nov 90. See also PB89-
194161 and PB89-194179. Prepared in cooperation with
Foster Wheeler Enviresponse, Inc., Edison, NJ. 10p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Stabilization,
Solidification, Remedial action, Soil treatment, Land pollution,
Superfund Innovative Technology Evaluation Program.
1554 Evaluation of Waste Stabilized by the Soliditech
SITE Technology
Order Number PB92-136878CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk
Reduction Engineering Lab; c1990
The Soliditech technology demonstration was conducted at
the Imperial Oil Company/Champion Chemicals Superfund
Site in Monmouth County, New Jersey. Contamination at the
site includes PCBs, lead (with various other metals) and oil
and grease. The process mixes the waste material with pro-
prietary additives, pozzolanic materials, and water, in a batch
mixer. Technical criteria used to evaluate its effectiveness in-
clude (1) short-term extraction and engineering tests; (2)
long-term extraction and and leaching tests; (3) petrographic
examination; and (4) structural integrity observations. Three
different waste types-contaminated soil, waste filter cake ma-
terial and oily sludge-and a sand blank were treated. Neither
PCBs nor volatile organic compounds were detected in the
extracts of treated wastes. Significantly reduced amounts of
metals were detected in the extracts of treated wastes com-
pared to untreated.
Specifications: Pub. in Jnl. of Air and Waste Management
Association, v40 n3 p310-316 1990. See also PB91-129817.
9p.
303
-------
TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION:
Solidification Technologies
Subject Index keywords: Chemical stabilization, Solidifica-
tion,Waste disposal. Waste treatment, Superfund,
Monrnouth(New Jersey).
1555 Immobilization Technology Seminar: Speaker Slide
Copies and Supporting Information
Order Number PB90-127473CDH, price: PC A09/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Center for
Environmental Research Information; Oct 89
Solidification/stabilization technology is being utilized as a
treatment technology for Resource Conservation and Recov-
ery Act RCRA listed waste and waste from uncontrolled haz-
ardqus yvaste sites. Several Best Demonstrated Available
Technology (BDATQ levels for Resource Conservation and
Recovery Act (RCRA) waste codes are based on solidifica-
tion/stabilization technology. Vitrification technology is
emerging as an alternative technology for hazardous waste.
Approximately 25 percent of the Records of Decision (RODs)
for Fiscal Year 1988 for the Superfund Program involved so-
lidification/stabilization.
Specifications: Also available from Supt. of Docs. 183p.
Subject Index keywords: Meetings, Solidification, Stabiliza-
tion, Waste treatment, Hazardous materials, Vitrification,
Technology utilization.
1556 In-situ Stabilization/Solidification of PCB
(Polychtorinated Biphenyls)-Contaminated Soil
Order Number PB90-113291CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Foster Wheeler Enviresponse, Inc., Edison, NJ.;
Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk
Reduction Engineering Lab; 1989
An evaluation was performed of the International Waste
Technologies HWT-20 additive and the Geo-Con, Inc. deep-
soii-mixing equipment for an in situ stabilization/solidification
process and its applicability as an onsite treatment method
for waste site cleanup. A demonstration was held at a Gen-
eral Electric Co. electric service shop in Hialeah, Florida
which provided the bulk of the information for the technology
evaluation. Conclusions were reached concerning the tech-
nology's suitability for use in cleanups of various contami-
nants and at different locations: immobilization of polychlori-
nated biphenyls (PCBs) appears likely, although due to low
leachate concentrations for both the treated and untreated
soils, a result of the low soil concentrations encountered in
most of the tests, it cannot be confirmed; heavy metals can
probably be immobilized; volatile organics can be reduced to
low concentrations in treated soil leachates, but the ability to
Immobilize is not clear; a small volume increase on the order
of magnitude of 5%-10% can be expected; the solidified ma-
terial shows satisfactory physical properties, with high uncon-
fined compressive strengths, moderately low permeabilities,
and satisfactory Integrity for the wet/dry samples, but unsat-
isfactory integrity for the freeze/thaw samples; and micros-
tructural results indicate a dense, low-porosity, homogeneous
mass, indicating a potential for long-term durability.
Specifications: Presented at International Conference for
New Frontiers for Hazardous Waste Management (3rd), held
in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania on September 10-13, 1989.
Sponsored by Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati,
OH. Risk Reduction Engineering Lab. 13p.
Subject Index keywords: Hazardous materials, Solidifica-
tion, Site surveys, Waste disposal, Stabilization, Collecting
methods, Land pollution, Polychlorinated biphenyls, Super-
fund program, Internationa Waste Technology, Cleanup op-
erations, Remedial action.
1557 International Waste Technplogies/Geo-Con In situ
Stabilization/Solidification: Applications Analysis Report
Order Number PB90-269085CDH, price: PC A05/MF A01
Foster Wheeler Enviresponse, Inc., Edison, NJ.;
Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk
Reduction Engineering Lab; Aug 90
An evaluation was performed of the International Waste
Technologies (IWT) HWT-20 additive and the Geo-Con, Inc.
deep-soil-mixing equipment for an in situ stabilization/solidifi-
cation process and its applicability as an on-site treatment
method for waste site cleanup. A demonstration was held at
a General Electric Co. electric service shop in Hialeah, Flori-
da. Conclusions were reached concerning the technology's
suitability for use in cleanups of various contaminants and at
different locations. The conclusions drawn from the available
data are that: (1) immobilization of polychlorinated biphenyls
(PCBs) appears likely, although due to low leachate concen-
trations for both the treated and untreated soils as a result of
the low PCB concentrations in soil encountered in most of
the tests, it cannot be confirmed; (2) heavy metals can prob-
ably be immobilized; (3) volatile organics can be reduced to
low concentrations in treated soil leachates, but the ability to
immobilize is not clear; and (4) a small volume increase on
the order of magnitude of 5%-10% can be expected.
Specifications: See also PB90-269077. Sponsored by Envi-
ronmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk Reduction
Engineering Lab. 92p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste dis-
posal, Earth fills, Waste treatment, Superfund, Polychlorinat-
ed biphenyls.
1558 Results from the Stabilization Technologies
Evaluated by the Site Program. New England
Environmental Expo 90
Order Number PB91-162479CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk
Reduction Engineering Lab; 1990
The Superfund Innovative Technology Evaluation (SITE) Pro-
gram was developed to assist the development of hazardous
waste treatment technologies necessary to implement new
cleanup standards which require greater reliance on perma-
nent remedies. As part of the SITE program, four stabilization
and solidification processes have been performed, six treat-
ability studies are underway, and five demonstrations are in
the planning and site selection phase. During these demon-
strations, the effectiveness of the stabilization/solidification
processes was evaluated by measuring the chemical and
physical characteristics before and after treatment. An over-
all conclusion, from the completed SITE demonstration on
Stabilization Processes, is that a Treatability study should be
required before selecting a remediation technology. Also, it
appears that each stabilization process has similar capabili-
ties to treat metals and inorganics, and significantly different
capabilities to handle organics.
Specifications: Proceedings of the New England Environ-
mental Expo 90, Hynes Convention Center, Boston, MA.,
April 10-12, 1990. 16p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Hazardous materials,
Waste treatment, Stabilization, Remedial action.
304
-------
15ff u-f:'TE Demonstra«°n of the CHEMFIX Solidification/
Stabilization Process at the Portable Equipment Salvage
Company Site
Order Number PB90-217621CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk
Reduction Engineering Lab; C1990
A demonstration of the CHEMFIX solidification/stabilization
process was conducted under the United States Environ-
mental Protection Agency's (EPA) Superfund Innovative
Technology Evaluation (SITE) program. The demonstration
was conducted in March 1989, at the Portable Equipment
Salvage Company (PESC) uncontrolled hazardous waste site
in Ciackamas, Oregon. Waste containing lead, copper, and
polychlonnated biphenyls (PCBs) from four different areas of
the site were treated. Results showed substantial reduction
of teachable lead and copper between the untreated waste
and treated waste utilizing the EPA Toxicity Characteristics
Leaching Procedure (TCLP) test. The effectiveness of this
process for immobilizing PCBs could not be determined since
the raw waste did not leach PCBs at high concentrations uti-
lizing the TCLP test. Data from other leaching tests for lead
and copper would need to be utilized as input into a site spe-
cific groundwater model to determine whether solidification/
stabilization would be an acceptable remedy for the site
Physical testing results indicated durability in exposed condi-
tions. (Copyright (C) 1990-Air and Waste Management Asso-
ciation.)
Specifications: Pub. in Jnl. of the Air and Waste Manage-
ment Association, p166-170 1990. 7p.
Subject index keywords: Waste disposal, Hazardous mate-
rials, Solidification, Stabilization, Waste treatment, Superfund
Innovative Technology Evaluation, Encapsulation CHEMFIX
process, Remedial action.
1560 Solidification/Stabilization: Is It Always Appropriate
Order Number PB92-191188CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk
Reduction Engineering Lab.; American Society for Testinq
and Materials, Philadelphia, PA; c1992
The increasing use of solidification/stabilization (S/S) tech-
nologies in the United States, especially for remediation of
sites under the Superfund program, has raised several ques-
tions about the overall appropriateness of S/S. For many
types of hazardous waste, notably for heavy metals, S/S
usually gives excellent results for long-term immobilization
as measured by existing physical and chemical protocols
However, results of several studies, as well as data from re-
mediation of several Superfund sites, have raised concerns
about whether S/S is a valid technology for treating organic-
bearing wastes. Furthermore, studies also provide evidence
that tests other than the regulatory extraction tests (for ex-
ample, toxicity characteristic leaching procedure (TCLP)) will
be required to evaluate the effectiveness of S/S, especially
when applied to organic wastes. Suggestions are offered for
improving treatability studies used for evaluating S/S applied
to selected metals. Approaches are also provided for deter-
mining the appropriateness of S/S applied to organic con-
taminants. The paper will focus on evaluating chemical
leaching behavior as a measure of S/S effectiveness A de-
cision tree is presented for determining the suitability of S/S
treatment for wastes containing organic contaminants, which
can be more difficult than metals to immobilize.
TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION:
Solidification Technologies
Specifications: Pub. in Stabilization and Solidification of
Hazardous, Radioactive, and Mixed Wastes, v2 STP1123
P18-32. See also PB91-182741 and PB90-116773. Prepared
in cooperation with American Society for Testing and Materi-
als, Philadelphia, PA. 18p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Solidifica-
tion, Stabilization, Waste treatment, Remedial action.
1561 Solidification/Stabilization of Organics and
Inorganics
Order Number PB94-106333CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk
Reduction Engineering Lab; Sep 92
The engineering bulletin on solidification refers to techniques
that encapsulate hazardous waste into a solid material of
high structural integrity. Encapsulation involves either fine
waste particles (microencapsulation) or a large block or con-
tainer of wastes (macroencapsulation). Stabilization refers to
techniques that treat hazardous waste by converting it into a
less soluble, mobile, or toxic form. Solidification/Stabilization
processes utilize one or both of these techniques. The bulle-
tin provides information on the technology applicability, the
technology limitations, a description of the technology, the
types of residuals produced, site requirements, the latest per-
formance data, the status of the technology, and sources of
further information.
Specifications: See also PB87-116745, PB90-179656 and
PB93-172948. 15p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Stabilization,
Solidification, Waste treatment, Remedial action, Solid waste
disposal.
1562 Soliditech, Inc. Solidification/Stabilization Process:
Applications Analysis Report
Order Number PB91-129817CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk
Reduction Engineering Lab; Sep 90
The Soliditech process mixes and chemically treats waste
material with Urrichem (a proprietary reagent), additives, poz-
zolanic materials or cement, and water, in aten-cubic yard
batch concrete mixer to form a more stable material. This
technology was demonstrated in December 1988 at the Im-
perial Oil Company/Champion Chemical Company Superfund
site in Morganville, New Jersey. Contaminated soil, waste
filter cake material, and oily sludge, containing PCBs, various
metals, and petroleum hydrocarbons were treated. The proc-
ess was evaluated based on contaminant mobility, measured
by leaching and permeability tests; structural and integrity of
the solidified material, measured by physical, engineering,
and morphological tests; and economic analysis, using cost
information supplied by Soliditech, Inc. The conclusions
drawn were: (1) process can solidify waste materials contain-
ing high oil and grease concentrations; (2) heavy metals
such as arsenic, cadmium, lead, and zinc are successfully
immobilized; (3) short-term physical stability of the treated
waste was high; (4) some long-term tests of the treated
wastes indicate a potential for physical degradation, while
others indicate stability; (5) treatment results in a 22 percent
average volume increase and an average bulk density in-
crease of 33 percent; and (6) the process is economical.
Specifications: 59p.
305
-------
IMPLEMENTATION:
Solidification Technologies
Subject index keywords: Chemical stabilization, Solidifica-
tion, Superfund, Remedial action, Technology assessment,
Soltdjteeh process.
1563 Sorption, Important in Stabilized/Solidified Waste
Forms
Order Number PB94-155256CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Dames and Moore, Cincinnati, OH.; Cincinnati Univ., OH. •
Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering.*Environmental
Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk Reduction
Engineering Lab; c1994
Sorption is one of the important fixation mechanisms of
metals in stabilized/solidified waste forms. In the present
work, the sorption-desorption processes active in cement-
based waste forms in acetic acid solutions were investigated.
Experimental results indicated that the extent of sorption of a
metal ion was strongly "jp'H dependent. Cement-based waste
forms had similar sorption characteristics as amphorous
silica gel. The pH of the sorption edge is 5 to 6.5 for Pb(2-)
and As(3-), 6 to 8.5 for Cd(2-), and 8 to 12 for Ca(2-). In
addition, almost 90% of the lead and cadmium were leach-
able at pH 4.5, while nearly 30% of arsenic remained un-
leached at the same pH. (Copyright (c) Hazardous Waste
and Hazardous Materials 1992.)
Specifications: Pub. in Hazardous Waste and Hazardous
Materials, v9 n3 p289-296 1992. See also PB90-127473.
Prepared in cooperation with Cincinnati Univ., OH. Dept. of
Civil and Environmental Engineering. Sponsored by Environ-
meifal Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk Reduction
Engineering Lab. lip.
Subject index keywords: Sorption, Waste treatment, Solidi-
fication, Stabilization, Superfund, Remedial action, Stabilized/
solidified waste.
1564 Superfund Innovative Technology Evaluation
Technology Demonstration Summary: Chemfix
Solidification/Stabilization Process, Clackamas, Oregon
Order Number PB91-921373CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Dec 90
The document summarizes the demonstration of Chemfix's
patented stabilization/solidification technology at the Porta-
ble Equipment Salvage Company (PESC) site in Ciackamas,
Oregon, as a part of the Superfund Innovative Technology
Evaluation (SITE) Program. The chemfix process is designed
to solidify and stabilize hazardous wastes in liquids, sludges,
soils, and ashes using proprietary additives.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $150 U.S., Canada,
an4 Mexico; all others $300). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 6p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Stabilization,
Waste treatment, Superfund, Clackamas(Oregon).
1565 Technical Resource Document: Solidification/
Stabilization and Its Application to Waste Materials
Order Number PB93-237535CDH, price: PC A16/MF A03
Battelle, Columbus, OH.; Environmental Protection Agency,
Cincinnati, OH. Risk Reduction Engineering Lab; Jun 93
Stabilization/solidification (S/S) processes are effective in
treating a variety of difficult to manage waste materials for
reuse or disposal. S/S has been identified as the Best Dem-
onstrated Available Technology for treating a wide range of
Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) non-
wasfewater hazardous waste subcategories. S/S has been
selected as the treatment technology of choice for 26% of
the remedial actions complete at Superfund sites through
fiscal year 1992. The standard bulk material handling and
mixing equipment used in many S/S processes make the
technology appear simple. The morphology and chemistry of
S/S-treated waste are complex. Selection of the binder re-
quires an understanding of the chemistry of the bulk material,
the contaminants, and the binder. Battelle, under the direc-
tion of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, has pre-
pared the Technical Resources Document (TRD) as a re-
source for the S/S user community and a guide to promote
the best future application of S/S processes.
Specifications: Sponsored by Environmental Protection
Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk Reduction Engineering Lab.
369p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste man-
agement, Waste treatment.
1566 Technology Evaluation Report: Chemfix
Technologies, Inc. Solidification/Stabilization Process,
Clackamas, Oregon. Volume 1
Order Number PB91-127696CDH, price: PC A07/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 90
The CHEMFIX solidification/stabilization process was evalu-
ated in the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's SITE
program. Waste from an uncontrolled hazardous waste site
was treated by the CHEMFIX process and subjected to a va-
riety of physical and chemical test methods. Physical testing
on the treated material indicated durability in exposed envi-
ronmental conditions. The treated waste exhibited adequate
physical properties. The treated waste generally met the reg-
ulatory leaching criteria established for the demonstration.
Volume I provides a comprehensive description of the tech-
nology and the procedures used in the SITE demonstration,
a complete description of the analytical results from the SITE
demonstration, and an evaluation of the cost of the CHEM-
FIX technology. Volume II contains the analytical data, QA/
QC data, and other information related to this SITE demon-
stration.
Specifications: See also Volume 2, PB90-274127. 133p.
Subject index keywords: Waste treatment, Solidification,
Chemical stabilization, Superfund, Land pollution abatement,
CHEMFIX process.
1567 Technology Evaluation Report: International Waste
Technologies/Geo-Con In situ Stabilization/
Solidification. Volume 3. Update Report
Order Number PB90-269069CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
Foster Wheeler Enviresponse, Inc., Edison, NJ.;
Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk
Reduction Engineering Lab; Sep 90
The long-term performance tests provide information on the
first follow-up sampling and analysis on the SITE program
demonstration of the International Waste Technologies addi-
tive, and the Geo-Con deep soil mixing equipment. The sam-
ples containing PCBs, were collected one year after the
demonstration, and the chemical and physical test results
were compared to those obtained during the demonstration.
This was the first part of a 5-year monitoring program on this
in-situ stabilization/solidification process. The demonstration
was performed in April 1988 at an electric service shop in
306
-------
Hfaleah, FL Volume 3 discusses the results of the long-term
SonstmtioT ^ h°W they C°mpare to the results °f *he
.w 3|SO PB9°-269085 and Volume 2,
and Volume 4, PB90-269077. Sponsored by
Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk Re
auction Engineering Lab. 54p.
f °n !?u^ keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste dis-
l, Earth fills, Waste treatment, Superfund.
TY^hnT"1-*""/'^ Evaluatlon Report: International Waste
Technologies/Geo-Con In situ Stabilization/
Solidification. Volume 4. Update Report
Order Number PB90-269077CDH, price: PC A16/MF A02
Foster Wheeler Enviresponse, Inc., Edison, NJ •
Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk
Reduction Engineering Lab; Sep 90
IS iong"term Performance tests provide information on the
first follow-up sampling and analysis on the SITE program
tto •nSfo0' !^e lnjternational Waste Technologies addi-
tve, and the Geo-Con deep soil mixing equipment. The sam-
ples containing PCBs, were collected one year after the
demonstration, and the chemical and physical test results
Thi^^Tlh3^ !° th°S? obtained dljring the demonstration.
This was the first part of a 5-year monitoring program on this
m-situ stabilization/solidification process. The> demonstration
was Performed in April 1988 at an electric service shop in
Hialeah FL Volume 4 contains the technical operating data-
logs, laboratory analyses, and microstructural analyses.
PRQn'SQn^81 e See alSO PB90-269085 and Volume 3,
payu-269069 Sponsored by Environmental Protection
Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk Reduction Engineering Lab.
, '2d!K,kIfyT,?rds: Hazardous materials, Solid waste
I, Earth fills, Waste treatment.
1569 Technology Evaluation Report SITE Program
Demonstration Test, HAZCON Solidification,
Douglassville, Pennsylvania. Volume 1
Order Number PB89-158810CDH, price: PC A07/MF A01
Enviresponse Inc Livingston, NJ.; Environmental Protection
Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Office of Research and
Development; Feb 89
The major objectives of the HAZCON Solidification SITE Pro-
gram Demonstration Test were to develop reliable perform-
ance and cost information. The HAZCON process mixes he
hazardous waste material with cement, a proprietary additive
canea uiioranan and water. The Chloranan is claimed to
t^ hvrirfti!!?6 irjhibitin9 etlect that organics normally have on
the hydration of cement. The technical criteria used to evalu-
nLnt mrfh^h6"6^ °f !he HAZCON process were contami-
nant mobility, based on leaching and permeability tests; and
potential integrity of solidified soils, based on measurements
of physical and microstructural properties. Extensive sam-
pling and analyses were performed showing the concentra-
nnJL t U8 °!\ganics were the same in the leachates of the
2ES f H trf ^ S,°ilS' heavy metals reductions were
!2 T ',And !,tructural properties of the solidified cores
were found to indicate good long-term stability.
Specifications: See also PB89-158828. Sponsored by Envi-
^1?ltntaLPn0tef''°n A9encv' Cincinnati, OH. Office of Re-
search and Development. 131 p.
TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION:
Solidification Technologies
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Cost analy-
sis, Encapsulating, Oil wastes, Solidification, Superfund
project, SITE program, HAZCON solidification process Oil
pollution.
1570 Technology Evaluation Report: SITE Program
Demonstration Test, Soliditech, Inc., Solidification/
Stabilization Process. Volume 1
Order Number PB90-191750CDH, price: PC A07/MF A01
PRC Environmental Management, Inc., Chicago, IL;
Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk
Reduction Engineering Lab; Feb 90
The primary objective of the Soliditech, Inc. solidification/sta-
bilization demonstration was to develop reliable performance
and cost information. The demonstration took place at the
Imperial Oil Company/Champion Chemical Company Super-
fund site in Morganville, New Jersey. Contamination at this
site includes PCBs, various metals, and oil and grease The
Soliditech process mixes the waste material with Urrichem a
proprietary reagent; proprietary additives; pozzolanic materi-
als or cement (cement was used for the demonstration); and
water, in an open-topped concrete mixer. The technical crite-
ria used to evaluate the effectiveness of the Soliditech proc-
ess were contaminant mobility, based upon leaching and per-
meability tests; and the structural integrity of the solidified
material, based upon physical and morphological tests The
treated wastes had significant structural integrity, low perme-
ability, and higher bulk density than the untreated wastes pH
values of the treated wastes were highly influenced by alka-
linity of the Portland cement added during treatment Docu-
mentation will consist of two reports. This one is the Tech-
nology Evaluation Report that describes the field activities
and laboratory results.
Specifications: See also Volume 2, PB90-191768 Spon-
sored by Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH.
Hisk Reduction Engineering Lab. 138p.
Subject index keywords: Waste treatment, Hazardous ma-
terials, Solidification, Stabilization, Technology utilization Su-
perfund Innovative Technology Evaluation Program, Solidi-
tech process.
1571 Technology Evaluation Report: SITE Program
Demonstration Test, Soliditech, Inc. Solidification/
Stabilization Process. Volume 2
Order Number PB90-191768CDH, price: PC$77.00
PRC Environmental Management, Inc., Chicago, IL;
Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk
Reduction Engineering Lab; Feb 90
The primary objective of the Soliditech, Inc. solidification/sta-
bilization demonstration was to develop reliable performance
and cost information. The demonstration took place at the
Imperial Oil Company/Champion Chemical Company Super-
fund site in Morganville, New Jersey. Contamination at this
site includes PCBs, various metals, and oil and grease. The
Soliditech process mixes the waste material with Urrichem a
proprietary reagent; proprietary additives; pozzolanic materi-
als or cement (cement was used for the demonstration); and
water, in an open-topped concrete mixer. The technical crite-
ria used to evaluate the effectiveness of the Soliditech proc-
ess were contaminant mobility, based upon leaching and per-
meability tests; and the structural integrity of the solidified
material, based upon physical and morphological tests The
treated wastes had significant structural integrity, low perme-
307
-------
TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION:
Surface Water & Sludge Treatment Technologies
ability, and higher fc>ulk density than the untreated wastes. pH
values of the treated wastes were highly influenced by alka-
linity of the portland cement added during treatment. Docu-
mentation will consist of two reports. This one is the Applica-
tion Analysis Report that provides an interpretation of the
data!"'and discusses the potential applicability of the technol-
ogy.
Specifications: See also Volume 1, PB90-191750. Portions
of this document are no! fully legible. Sponsored by Environ-
mental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk Reduction
Engineering Lab. 675p.
Subject index keywords: Waste treatment, Hazardous ma-
terials, Solidification, Stabilization, Technology utilization, Su-
perfund Innovative Technology Evaluation Program, Solidi-
tech process.
TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM
IMPLEMENTATION: Surface Water &
Sludge Treatment Technologies
1572 Acid Volatile Sulfide Predicts the Acute Toxicity of
Cadmium and Nickel in Sediments
Order Number P193-222107CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Manhattan Coll., Bronx, NY.; Science Applications
International Corpl, Narragansett, RI.*Environmental
Research Lab., Narragansett, Rl; c1991
Laboratory toxicity tests using amphipods, oligochaetes, and
snals with spiked freshwater and marine sediments and with
conj^mjnated sediments collected from an EPA Superfund
site demonstrate that no significant mortality occurs relative
to controls if the molar concentration of acid volatile sulfide
(AVS) In the sediment is greater than the molar concentra-
tion of simultaneously extracted cadmium and/or nickel. Al-
though it is well-known that these metals can form insoluble
sulfides, It apparently has not been realized that AVS is a re-
active pool of solid-phase sulfide that is available to bind
metals and render that portion unavailable and nontoxic to
biota. Thus, the AVS concentration of a sediment establishes
the Boundary below which these metals cease to exhibit an
acute toxicity in freshwater and marine sediments. (Copyright
(c) 1991 American Chemical Society.)
Specifications: Pub. in Environmental Science and Tech-
nology, v26 n1 p96-101 1992. Prepared in cooperation with
Science Applications International Corp., Narragansett, Rl.
Sponsored by Environmental Research Lab., Narragansett,
Rl. 8p.
Subject index keywords: Toxicity, Cadmium, Nickel, Water
pollution effects(Animals), Acid volatile sulfides.
1573 Application of a Water Quality Assessment
Modeling System at a Superfund Site
Orcler Number PB92-164490CDH, price: PC A05/MF A01
ASci Corp., Athens, GAl; Environmental Research Lab.,
Athens, GA. Office of Research and Development; Aug 91
Water quality modeling and related exposure assessments at
a Superfund site, Silver Bow Creek-Clark Fork River in Mon-
tana, demonstrate the capability to predict the fate of mining
waste pollutants in the environment. A linked assessment
system - consisting of hydrology and erosion, river hydrau-
lics, surface water quality, metal speciation, non-point source
and groundwater mixing and transport models - has been
applied at the site to show the applicability of such modeling
schemes and the complexities involved in the application.
Some of the models had to be modified to match the re-
quirements of this project. Graphs of the water quality pa-
rameters show good fit between the measured and predicted
concentrations at some stations whereas substantial devi-
ations are observed at other stations along the course of the
stream.
Specifications: See also PB88-144167 and PB88-185095.
Sponsored by Environmental Research Lab., Athens, GA.
Office of Research and Development. 94p.
Subject index keywords: Mine wastes, Hydrology, Water
quality, Water pollution effects, Superfund, Mathematical
models.
1574 Application of 'Real-Time' Monitoring in Decision
Making: The New Bedford Harbor Pilot Dredging Project
Order Number PB94-130747CDH, price: PC A01/MF A01
Environmental Research Lab., Narragansett, Rl; 1994
A decision-making framework was established for assessing
the impacts of a pilot dredging study at the New Bedford
Harbor, MA, Superfund site. Concern over possible environ-
mental impacts due to dredging at the site necessitated that
a monitoring program be implemented to ensure that unac-
ceptable water quality impacts did not occur during the
project. A committee of environmental managers from Feder-
al and state government was established with the authority
to assess and modify the operation on a daily basis. Finally,
a 'real-time' monitoring plan was implemented in which water
samples were collected, analyzed within 16 hours, and the
data supplied to the management committee in order to
assess the environmental impact of the previous days' oper-
ation. The combined use of site-specific criteria and a 'real-
time' decision making management process allowed for suc-
cessful completion of the project with a minimal effect on
water quality.
Specifications: Pub. in Canadian Technical Report Fisher-
ies and Aquatic Sciences, v1(1774) p76-79 1991. Proceed-
ings of the Annual Toxicology Workshop (17th), Vancouver,
BC (Canada). 5p.
Subject index keywords: Dredging, Water pollution monitor-
ing, Polychlorinated biphenyls.
1575 CERCLA Site Discharges to POTWS CERCLA Site
Sampling Program: Detailed Data Report
Order Number PB91-921270CDH, price: PC A12/MF A02
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Aug 90
The document contains wastewater data obtained from sam-
pling at seventeen CERCLA sites during a study of
wastewater discharges from CERCLA sites to publicly owned
treatment works (POTWs). The document serves as an ap-
pendix to the report summarizing the findings of the CERCLA
site sampling program in Section 3 (CERCLA Site Data
Report) in the USEPA CERCLA Site Discharges to POTWs
Treatability Manual.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 251 p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
Hazardous materials, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
Response, Publicly Owned Treatment Works.
308
-------
1576 CERCLA Site Discharges to POTWs: Guidance
Manual
Order Number PB90-274531CDH, price: PC A11/MF A02
hnwonmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Aug 90
The purpose of the guidance manual is to provide the cur-
n?^69 f°^ framework and technical and administrative
guidance that is necessary for a Feasability Study (FS) evalu-
ating the remedial alternative of discharging wastes from
Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation
and Liability Act (CERCLA) sites to POTWs. The remedial a^
ternative .s to be evaluated and compared to other alterna-
6edhin thS FS" The POTW dischar9e alternate
< discharging untreated or pretreated wastes to a
A .*reatment and disposal. Aqueous wastes from
r S|tes can constitute a majority of waste treated
remedial clean-up efforts. These wastes can include
groundwater, leachate, surface runoff, and other aqueous
VVclSlSS.
Specifications: Also available from Supt. of Docs. 226p.
Subject index keywords: Water pollution, Ground water
trfa*ment' Waste water disposal, Industrial waste
es act'0ns' Sewa9e treatment plants, Site
15Manuaf RCLA Site Discharges to POTWS Treatability
Order Number PB91-921269CDH, price: PC$77 00
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Aug 90
The CERCLA Site Discharges to POTWs Treatability Manual
SPThPared f°r the U'S- EPA under Contract No. 68-03-
mttL tma,nua is.a comPilat'on of mostly technical infor-
tmatl°n a treatability data obtained in a study conducted by
the Office of Water Regulations and Standards Industrial
Techno ogy Division (OWRS-ITD) on Comprehensive Envi-
rppri"! RfsP°nse' Compensation, and Liability Act
k SJ waf ew5ter discharges to POTWs. The information
is provided to aid in the evaluation of the feasibility of dis-
.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 631 p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management
Hazardous materials, Manuals, Office of Solid Waste and
Emergency Response, Publicly Owned Treatment Works.
Bay Nearshore/Tideflats Feasibility
Study Development of Sediment Cleanup Goals
Order Number PB93-181253CDH, price: PC A05/MF A01
S£ ^ln*;;,BeueVue' WA'; PTI Environmental Services,
Bellevue, WA.*Washington State Dept. of Ecology
Olympia.*Environmental Protection Agency, Seattle WA
Region X; Feb 89
The document develops and evaluates sediment cleanup
goals for the implementation of sediment remedial action al-
ternatives in identified problem areas of Commencement
Bay. Tasks incorporated in the report are: compilation of in-
terim sediment cleanup goals (including identification of avail-
™i Sfd'men,t clualitv values and development of additional
values , development of options for cleanup goals that relate
to applicable regulatory mandates, and refinement of Com-
TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION-
Surface Water & Sludge Treatment Technologies
mencement Bay remedial investigation guidelines for prioritiz-
ing problem chemicals for use in evaluating the need for
source control actions.
Specifications: See also PB93-181220. Sponsored by PTI
Environmental Services, Bellevue, WA., Washington State
Dept. of Ecology, Olympia, and Environmental Protection
Agency, Seattle, WA. Region X. 91 p.
Subject index keywords: Sediments, Commencement Bay,
Remedial action, Water pollution control, Superfund, Waste
disposal, Cleanup operations.
1579 Commencement Bay Nearshore/Tideflats Feasibility
Study. Executive Summary
Order Number PB93-181220CDH, price: PC A06/MF A02
Tetra Tech, Inc., Bellevue, WA.; Washington State Dept. of
Ecology, Olympia.'Environmental Protection Agency, Seattle
WA. Region X; Dec 88
The report summarizes the findings of the feasibility study
prepared for the waterways/shoreline portion of the Com-
mencement Bay Nearshore/Tideflats Superfund site in
Tacoma, Washington. The purpose of the feasibility study
was to develop and evaluate the most appropriate remedial
strategies for correcting the human health and environmental
impacts associated with contaminated sediments in the site.
Specifications: See also PB93-181238, PB86-104551
through PB86-104601. Sponsored by Washington State
Dept. of Ecology, Olympia, and Environmental Protection
Agency, Seattle, WA. Region X. 108p.
Subject index keywords: Sediments, Water pollution con-
trol, Remedial action, Commencement Bay, Superfund,
Waste disposal, Cleanup operations.
1580 Commencement Bay Nearshore/Tideflats Feasibility
Study. Volume 1
Order Number PB93-181238CDH, price: PC A25/MF A06
Tetra Tech, Inc., Bellevue, WA.; Washington State Dept of
Ecology, Olympia.*Environmental Protection Agency Seattle
WA. Region X; Dec 88
The report documents the feasibility study prepared for the
waterways/shoreline portion of the Commencement Bay
Nearshore/Tideflats Superfund site in Tacoma, Washington.
The purpose of the feasibility study was to develop and
evaluate the most appropriate remedial strategies for correct-
ing the documented biological, human health and environ-
mental impacts associated with contaminated sediments in
the site. Given the large study area, the multiplicity of con-
taminant sources, and the diversity of ongoing activities
within the site, the development of the recommended reme-
dial strategies differ in many respects from the reports and
implementation strategies at more traditional Superfund sites.
Specifications: See also PB93-181246. Sponsored by
Washington State Dept. of Ecology, Olympia, and Environ-
mental Protection Agency, Seattle, WA. Region X. 592p.
Subject index keywords: Sediments, Water pollution con-
trol, Commencement Bay, Remedial action, Superfund
Waste disposal, Cleanup operations.
309
-------
TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION:
Surface Water & Sludge Treatment Technologies
1581 Commencement Bay Nearshore/Tideflats Feasibility
Study. Volume 2. Appendices
Order, Number PB93-181246CDH, price: PC A18/MF A04
Tetra tech, Inc., Bellevue, WA.; Washington State Dept. of
Ecology, Olympia.*Environmental Protection Agency, Seattle,
WA. Region X; Dec 88
The report documents the feasibility study prepared for the
waterways/shoreline portion of the Commencement Bay
Nearshore/Tideflats Superfund site in Tacoma, Washington.
The purpose of the feasibility study was to develop and
evaluate the most appropriate remedial strategies for correct-
Ing the documented biological, human health and environ-
mental Impacts associated with contaminated sediments in
the site. Given the large study area, the multiplicity of con-
taminant sources, and the diversity of ongoing activities
within the site, the development of the recommended reme-
dial strategies differ in many respects from the reports and
implementation strategies at more traditional Superfund sites.
Volume 2 contains the following appendices: evaluation of
sediment recovery^details of dredging and capping technol-
ogies, specifications of major ARARs and TCBs, methods for
estimating costs of sediment remedial alternatives, source
loading data, sampling station locations, field survey data
repcSrt- May 1986.
Specifications: See also PB93-181253. Sponsored by
Washington State Dept. of Ecology, Olympia, and Environ-
mental Protection Agency, Seattle, WA. Region X. 408p.
Subject index keywords: Sediments, Water pollution con-
trol, Commencement Bay, Remedial action, Superfund,
Waste disposal, Cleanup operations.
1582 Dealing with Toxic Polluted Sediments in the Great
Lakes Basin
Order Number AD-P006 908/8CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Envjronmental Protection Agency, Chicago, IL. Great Lakes
National Program Office; Apr 92
The United States and Canada signed the Great Lakes
Water Quality Agreement in 1972. In 1978, the Agreement
was expanded to cover pollution from toxic chemicals. Since
1973 the Great Lakes Water Quality Board has identified
spe'cific areas such as harbors, river mouths, and connecting
channels as geographic areas of concern. Now the major
problem In the majority of these areas is in-place polluted
sediments. The Water Quality Board instituted a new ranking
system for these areas in 1985. The purpose of the new
system is to encourage progress and to allow the Board to
report the status of investigatory and remedial activities ac-
curately. The United States and Canada have banned pro-
duction and use of certain toxic compounds such as DDT,
diejdrln, and PCB's. The concentrations of these chemicals
In fish have decrease! over the last several years. Now the
concentrations seem to be leveling-off, probably due to the
continuing reservoir in the sediments. The highest concentra-
tions of PCB's, up to 520,000 ppm, are found in Waukegan
Harbor. The design of the proposed remedial action, under
the United States Superfund authority, has been completed
for Waukegan.
Specifications: this article is from 'Management of Bottom
Sediments Containing Toxic Substances: Proceedings of the
U.S./Japan Experts Meeting (12th) Held in Yokohama, Japan
on11-14 November 1986', AD-A253 002, p257-267. 11 p.
Subject index keywords: Great lakes, Pollution, Sediments,
Bas!ns(Geographic), Toxic hazards.
1583 Development and Use of Site-Specific Chemical and
Biological Criteria for Assessing New Bedford Harbor
Pilot Dredging Project
Order Number PB91-182329CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Research Lab., Narragansett, Rl; c1991
Numerical site-specific chemical and biological criteria were
established to assess the impact of a pilot dredging project
on water quality at the New Bedford Harbor, Massachusetts,
USA Superfund site. Because most existing chemical con-
centrations in the water column and indigenous biota ex-
ceeded federal and state water quality limits, the derivation
of site-specific criteria was required. Prior to any operational
phases of the project (i.e., dike construction, dredging), crite-
ria values were developed from background concentrations
of PCBs and metals in water and biota, as well as for the
toxic effects of water quality on the biota. During each oper-
ational phase of the project, water samples were collected,
analyzed within 16 h, and the data supplied to a manage-
ment committee in order to assess the environmental impact
of the previous days operation. The ambient unfiltered water
concentration of PCBs and metals were the only chemical or
biological criteria exceeded. Modification of the next days
operations resulted in a return of these concentrations to
background levels. The combined use of site-specific criteria
and a real-time decision making management process al-
lowed for successful completion of the project with a minimal
effect on water quality. (Copyright (c) 1991 Springer-Verlag
New York Inc.)
Specifications: Pub. in Environmental Management, v15 n1
p105-112 1991. 10p.
Subject index keywords: Water quality management, Water
pollution, Dredging, Biological effects, Water chemistry, New
Bedford Harbor.
1584 DuPont/Oberlin Microfiltration Technology.
Applications Analysis Report
Order Number PB92-119023CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
PRC Environmental Management, Inc., Chicago, IL.;
Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk
Reduction Engineering Lab; Oct 91
The DuPont/Oberlin microfiltration technology demonstration
was conducted under the SITE program at the Palmerton
Zinc Superfund site in Palmerton, Pennsylvania, in April and
May 1990. During the demonstration, the microfiltration
system achieved zinc and total suspended solids (TSS) re-
moval efficiencies of about 99.95 percent, and a filter cake
solids content of 41 percent. The filter cake contained no
free liquids, and a composite sample from all the demonstra-
tion runs passed both the extraction procedure toxicity char-
acteristic leaching procedure (TCLP) test. The filtrate met ap-
plicable National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System
permit limits for metals and TSS.
Specifications: See also PB84-128677 and PB90-144155.
Sponsored by Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati,
OH. Risk Reduction Engineering Lab. 62p.
Subject index keywords: Water pollution control, Hazard-
ous materials, Land pollution control, Superfund, Liquid fil-
ters, Liquid wastes, Microfiltration, DuPont/Oberlin Microfiltra-
tion Treatment System.
310
-------
TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION:
Surface Water & Sludge Treatment Technologies
1585 EPA/ORD (Environmental Protection Agency/Office
of Research and Development) Role and Perspective in
Sediment Research
Order Number PB90-113093CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Research Lab.-Duluth, MM; 1989
Most chemical contaminants and organic wastes in aquatic
ecosystems eventually accumulate in sediments where they
may adversely affect the benthic biota, become a source of
contamination in the water column, accumulate in biological
tissues, and enter pelagic and human food chains. Contami-
nated sediments now appear to be the main source of toxic
pollutants in many bays, lakes, and rivers. Because of their
potential adverse impacts, the long periods of time associat-
ed with natural assimilation of many in-place pollutants, and
the high costs of mitigation, sediments have become a focus
of concern for many of EPA's research and regulatory pro-
grams. Programs in which sediment quality assessments are
currently required include ocean dumping, NEPA review, Su-
perfund, and estuarine protection. The documents addresses
regulatory applications, current and future sediment quality
criteria needs, and both chemical specific and nonchemical
specific sediment quality evaluations. Mitigation/prevention
of sediment quality problems are identified and five kinds of
predictive methods are suggested, as well as future research
to develop more sensitive testing .capabilities.
Specifications: 13p.
Subject index keywords: Sediments, Research projects
Water pollution, US EPA, Sediment-water interfaces.
1586 Evaluating Amphibian Responses in Wetlands
Impacted by Mining Activities in the Western United
States
Order Number PB91-191106CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Corvallis Environmental Research Lab., OR.; ManTech
Environmental Technology, Inc., Corvallis, OR; 1991
An increasing awareness of declining amphibian populations
in the United States requires that the authors develop strate-
gies for evaluating anthropogenic impacts on wetlands and
the biota dependent upon these habitats. For example, in the
western United States, mining activities may impact a wet-
land and its biota directly through habitat destruction or run-
off of sediments and contaminants generated during mining
operations. Amphibians which frequent these transition
zones between terrestrial and aquatic habitats may be key
biological indicators of a wetland's status. Through a demon-
stration project located in the mining regions of western
Montana, the authors are currently using laboratory and field
methods for a wetland evaluation required within a Super-
fund ecological risk assessment.
Specifications: Pub. in Proceedings: Thorne Symposium
Apr 91. Prepared in cooperation with ManTech Environmen-
tal Technology, Inc., Corvallis, OR. 41 p.
Subject index keywords: Mining, Environmental impacts,
Amphibia, Habitability, Water pollution, Wetlands.
1587 Framework for Real-Time Decision-Making: New
Bedford Harbor Pilot Dredging Study
Order Number PB90-150822CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Research Lab., Narragansett, Rl; Nov 89
New Bedford Harbor is located along Buzzards Bay between
the cities of New Bedford and Fairhaven, Mass. Since the
1940s, electronics and manufacturing companies in the area
have discharged effluents containing polychlorinated biphen-
yls (PCBs) into the Acushnet River and the harbor. Over the
past 15 years, nearly 18,000 acres of PCB- and heavy
metals-contaminated sediment have been identified, with
PCB concentrations as high as 100,000 parts per million
(ppm) in some areas of the upper harbor. In 1982, the site
was added to the Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA)
National Priorities List of hazardous waste sites slated for
cleanup under the Superfund Act. A feasibility study conduct-
ed by EPA in 1984 proposed several alternatives for the re-
mediation of NBH including dredging contaminated sedi-
ments out of the harbor. Federal, State, and local officials, as
well as the public, expressed concern over dredging. Many
believed that sediments resuspended during dredging would
cause the release of contaminants that would affect biota in-
habiting both the harbor and Buzzards Bay. Others cited po-
tential pollution problems from contaminated water (leachate)
leaking from the proposed disposal site. In order to address
these concerns, the EPA decided to pre-test dredging and
possible disposal options.
Specifications: 14p.
Subject index keywords: Decision making, New Bedford
Harbor, Dredging, Waste disposal, Real time operations, Risk
assessment, Water pollution sampling, Polychlorinated bi-
phenyls, Heavy metals, Cleanup operations.
1588 Handbook for Constructed Wetlands Receiving Acid
Mine Drainage
Order Number PB93-233914CDH, price: PC A13/MF A03
Colorado School of Mines, Golden.; Knight Piesold and Co.,
Denver, CO.**Camp, Dresser and McKee, Inc., Denver,
CO.*Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk
Reduction Engineering Lab; Sep 93
In the summer of 1987, a pilot constructed wetland was built
at the Big Five Tunnel in Idaho Springs, Colorado. The report
details the theory, design and construction of wetlands re-
ceiving acid mine drainages, based on the second and third
year of operation of this wetland, which was funded by the
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency under the SITE
Emerging Technologies Program. The text is divided into two
broad sections: Part A - Theoretical Development, and Part B
- Design Consideration. In the latter sections of Part A and
through all of Part B the focus is on removal of metals by
precipitation of sulfides through the activity of sulfate reduc-
ing bacteria.
Specifications: See also PB93-190734. Prepared in coop-
eration with Knight Piesold and Co., Denver, CO., and Camp,
Dresser and McKee, Inc., Denver, CO. Sponsored by Envi-
ronmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk Reduction
Engineering Lab. 252p.
Subject Index keywords: Acid mine drainage, Wetlands,
Water pollution control, Created wetlands.
1589 Handbook: Responding to Discharges of Sinking
Hazardous Substances
Order Number PB91-228346CDH, price: PC A13/MF A03
Science Applications International Corp., McLean, VA.;
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response.*Coast Guard,
Washington, DC; Sep 87
The document provides guidance on the response to spills of
chemicals that sink in water bodies and contaminate bottom
materials. It describes the decisionmaking process associat-
ed with defining spill parameters and impacts and selecting
appropriate response measures. It also describes the clean-
311
-------
TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION:
Surface Water & Sludge Treatment Technologies
up arid mitigative technologies that may be used, including
containment, removal, treatment, disposal, and in situ tech-
niques. The document provides governmental and industrial
technical personnel with the means to respond to bottom
material contamination situations, whether for quick response
or for long-term remediation.
Specifications: Sponsored by Environmental Protection
Agency, Washington, DC. Office of Emergency and Remedial
Response, and Coast Guard, Washington, DC. 290p.
Subject Index keyworls: Handbooks, Hazardous materials
spills, Water pollution effects, Bottom sediments, Waste dis-
posal, Remedial response.
1590 New Methods for Modeling the Transport of Metals
froiri Mineral Processing Wastes into Surface Waters
Order Number PB91-2i9097CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
AScI Corp., Athens, GA.; Environmental Research Lab.,
Athens, GA; c1991
The estimation of contaminant fluxes into and within river
basins is the aim of the research. These new methods for
estimating contaminant loadings and fate on a comprehen-
sive basin scale based on assembled subsite behaviors have
been demonstrated for a collection of Superfund sites in the
Upper Clark Fork River basin in Montana. This portion of the
demonstration illustrates a new set of techniques for estimat-
ing the overland and surface water movement of mine waste
constituents. A linked assessment system-consisting of con-
taminant transformation, nonpoint source and groundwater
mixing and transport, surface hydrology and erosion, and sur-
face water quality models-has been developed, written,
tested, and applied at the site. Principal portions of the as-
sessment system are described. The object of the project is
to show the importance of comparing phenomenological hy-
potheses with field observations for large-scale exposure
models. Graphs of the river copper concentration show a
good fit between the measured and predicted concentrations
at some stations, whereas substantial deviations from field
measurements are" observed at other stations along the
course of the river. (Copyright (c) 1991 by Marcel Dekker,
Inc.)
Specifications: Pub. in Jnl. of Environmental Science and
Health, vA26 n2 p157-203 Feb 91. Sponsored by Environ-
mental Research Lab., Athens, GA. 49p.
Subject Index keywords: Metals, Water pollution, Mathe-
matical models, Path of pollutants, Mine wastes.
1591 SITE-Emerging Technologies: Laser Induced
Photochemical Oxldative Destruction of Toxic Organics
In Leachates and Groundwaters
Order Number PB93-131431CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
Energy and Environmental Engineering, Inc., Somerville, MA.
Research and Development Div.; Environmental Protection
Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk Reduction Engineering Lab;
Dec 92
The technology described in the report has been developed
under the Emerging Technology Program of the Superfund
Innovative Technology Evaluation (SITE) Program to photo-
chemically oxidize organic compounds in wastewater by ap-
plying ultraviolet radiation using an excimer laser. The energy
supplied by the laser is sufficient to stimulate photochemical
reactions between the organics and hydrogen peroxide em-
ployed as a chemical oxidant, causing photooxidation and/or
phototransformation of the toxic species to carbon dioxide,
water and the corresponding halogenated acid. The photo-
chemical reaction is capable of producing the complete de-
struction of low to moderate concentrations of toxic organics
in water. Optimum conditions for the complete destruction of
several different classes of compounds were developed and
demonstrated in the laboratory.
Specifications: Sponsored by Environmental Protection
Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk Reduction Engineering Lab.
58p.
Subject index keywords: Water pollution control, Organic
compounds, Oxidation, Photochemical reactions, Superfund
Innovative Technology Evaluation Program, Laser induced
reactions.
1592 SITE Program Demonstration of the SBP
Technologies, Inc., Membrane Filtration System on
Creosote-Contaminated Water
Order Number PB93-228567CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk
Reduction Engineering Lab.; Science Applications
International Corp., Hackensack, NJ; c1993
The formed-in-place membrane filtration system offered by
SBP Technologies, Inc. of Stone Mountain, GA was evaluat-
ed by the USEPA SITE Program. The SITE Program Demon-
stration was accomplished at the American Creosote Works
site in Pensacola, FL in October 1991. The system effective-
ly performed an 82% volume reduction, and removed greater
than 95% of higher molecular weight PAHs and 92% of total
PAHs from the permeate stream. The permeate stream
SVOC concentration averaged 22.8 mg/L over the six-day
period. This stream was determined to be acceptable for dis-
charge to the local POTW. The membrane system tested
was not very effective at removing lower molecular weight
compounds (ca. 18%) such as phenolics. Of the total SVOCs
present, ca. 75% removals were achieved. For each 2000
gallons treated, ca. 200 gallons of wash water were utilized;
ca. 8% of contaminants were distributed to the washwater.
Estimates of capital and operating costs are between $202
and $675 per 1000 gallons treated (not including costs of
final disposal).
Specifications: Pub. in Jnl. of the Air and Waste Manage-
ment Association, v43 n3 p367-370 Mar 93. Prepared in co-
operation with Science Applications International Corp.,
Hackensack, NJ. 7p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Membranes, Filtration,
Water pollution control, SITE(Superfund Innovative Technolo-
gy Evaluation).
1593 Technology Evaluation Report. SITE Program
Demonstration, Resources Conservation Company,
Basic Extractive Sludge Treatment (B.E.S.T. (Trade
Name)), Grand Calumet River, Gary, Indiana. Volume 1
Order Number PB93-227122CDH, price: PC A08/MF A02
Science Applications International Corp., McLean, VA.;
Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk
Reduction Engineering Lab; Jul 93
The report summarizes the findings of an evaluation of the
Basic Extractive Sludge Treatment (B.E.S.T.) solvent extrac-
tion technology developed by Resources Conservation Com-
pany (RCC). During the demonstration test, the B.E.S.T.
system was used to treat composited sediments from two
areas of the Grand Calumet River. Contaminant concentra-
tion reductions of 96 percent for total polynuclear aromatic
hydrocarbons (PAHs) and greater than 99 percent for total
312
-------
TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION:
Surface Water & Sludge Treatment Technologies
polychiorinated biphenyls (PCBs) were achieved for Sedi-
ment A. Contaminant concentration reductions of greater
than 99 percent for total PAHs and greater than 99 percent
for total PCBs were achieved for Sediment B. Removal effi-
ciencies in excess of 98 percent were realized for both sedi-
ments for oil and grease (O&G).
Specifications: Also available in set of 4 reports PC E99/
MF E99, PB93-227114. See also Volume 2, Part 1, PB93-
227130. Sponsored by Environmental Protection Agency,
Cincinnati, OH. Risk Reduction Engineering Lab. 154p.
Subject index keywords: Pollution control, Solvent extrac-
tion, Superfund.
1594 Technology Evaluation Report. SITE Program
Demonstration, Resources Conservation Company,
Basic Extractive Sludge Treatment (B.E.S.T. (Trade
Name)), Grand Calumet River, Gary, Indiana. Volume 2.
Part 1
Order Number PB93-227130CDH, price: PC A24/MF A04
Science Applications International Corp., McLean, VA.;
Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk
Reduction Engineering Lab; Jul 93
The report summarizes the findings of an evaluation of the
Basic Extractive Sludge Treatment (B.E.S.T.) solvent extrac-
tion technology developed by Resources Conservation Com-
pany (RCC). During the demonstration test, the B.E.S.T.
system was used to treat composited sediments from two
areas of the Grand Calumet River. Contaminant concentra-
tion reductions of 96 percent for total polynuclear aromatic
hydrocarbons (PAHs) and greater than 99 percent for total
polychiorinated biphenyls (PCBs) were achieved for Sedi-
ment A. Contaminant concentration reductions of greater
than 99 percent for total PAHs and greater than 99 percent
for total PCBs were achieved for Sediment B. Removal effi-
ciencies in excess of 98 percent were realized for both sedi-
ments for oil and grease (O&G).
Specifications: Also available in set of 4 reports PC E99/
MF E99, PB93-227114. See also Volume 1, PB93-227122
and Volume 2, Part 2, PB93-227148. Sponsored by Environ-
mental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk Reduction
Engineering Lab. 556p.
Subject index keywords: Pollution control, Solvent extrac-
tion, Superfund.
1595 Technology Evaluation Report. SITE Program
Demonstration, Resources Conservation Company,
Basic Extractive Sludge Treatment (B.E.S.T. (Trade
Name)), Grant Calumet River, Gary, Indiana. Volume 2.
Part 2 i
Order Number PB93-227148CDH, price: PC$119.00
Science Applications International Corp., McLean, VA.;
Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk
Reduction Engineering Lab; Jul 93
The report summarizes the findings of an evaluation of the
Basic Extractive Sludge Treatment (B.E.S.T.) solvent extrac-
tion technology developed by Resources Conservation Com-
pany (RCC). During the demonstration test, the B.E.S.T.
system was used to treat composited sediments from two
areas of the Grand Calumet River. Contaminant concentra-
tion reductions of 96 percent for total polynuclear aromatic
hydrocarbons (PAHs) and greater than 99 percent for total
polychiorinated biphenyls (PCBs) were achieved for Sedi-
ment A. Contaminant concentration reductions of greater
than 99 percent for total PAHs and greater than 99 percent
for total PCBs were achieved for Sediment B. Removal effi-
ciencies in excess of 98 percent were realized for both sedi-
ments for oil and grease (O&G).
Specifications: Also available in set of 4 reports PC E99/
MF E99, PB93-227114. See also Volume 2, Part 1, PB93-
227130 and Volume 2, Part 3, PB93-227155. Sponsored by
Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk Re-
duction Engineering Lab. 726p.
Subject index keywords: Pollution control, Solvent extrac-
tion, Superfund.
1596 Technology Evaluation Report. SITE Program
Demonstration, Resources Conservation Company,
Basic Extractive Sludge Treatment (B.E.S.T. (Trade
Name)), Grand Calumet River, Gary, Indiana. Volume 2.
Parts
Order Number PB93-227155CDH, price: PC A11/MF A03
Science Applications International Corp., McLean, VA.;
Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk
Reduction Engineering Lab; Jul 93
The report summarizes the findings of an evaluation of the
Basic Extractive Sludge Treatment (B.E.S.T.) solvent extrac-
tion technology developed by Resources Conservation Com-
pany (RCC). During the demonstration test, the B.E.S.T.
system was used to treat composited sediments from two
areas of the Grand Calumet River. Contaminant concentra-
tion reductions of 96 percent for total polynuclear aromatic
hydrocarbons (PAHs) and greater than 99 percent for total
polychiorinated biphenyls (PCBs) were achieved for Sedi-
ment A. Contaminant concentration reductions of greater
than 99 percent for total PAHs and greater than 99 percent
for total PCBs were achieved for Sediment B. Removal effi-
ciencies in excess of 98 percent were realized for both sedi-
ments for oil and grease (O&G).
Specifications: Also available in set of 4 reports PC E99/
MF E99, PB93-227114. See also Volume 2, Part 2, PB93-
227148. Sponsored by Environmental Protection Agency,
Cincinnati, OH. Risk Reduction Engineering Lab. 230p.
Subject index keywords: Pollution control, Solvent extrac-
tion, Superfund.
313
-------
-------
-------
ii:i*ii» la^^ IIIIM^^^ niiiin^^^^ iiiiiiiB^^^^^ L:;!,I s
iniiiiii'i
!iii:iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiniii!!::ii!!:i;itii!fi!!i!
''HlEliiiillPlliiill'ihill! ii iillpiiiLilpllilllpiplPlllljlllPIPIIC'iinLPI lllllllllll'liiUtiiiP'PliillliniipTlllliEI'i; llllllllllillllilllll'lilillllllll'I'ILill''''!^!'!'!!!!!''!!!!!!!''!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! IllPilm1
I'l' 'I,
I'll ..... I |
...... I ..... l ..... I | ...... | I
Hill III 1111 III II ..... Ill I
111 III I III III! JII III I! II III III ill Hill II nilllllllllllll
nun i mi in n in nil ill i | n in nn in in i i mini in
l| III IInil I iillilllillll III Illlllllll ill ill I III i
I
n n i in in inn in n 11 inn 11 nn n n in inn in iininni i n i nn nn nil n n nn nn inn i
i i niii in n ii i ii i ii n i in i in n i inn i ill i in HIM in iiiiinn n n nn inn
in iiiiiiiini i iiiinnn i
I III II
I 111 III I Illlllllll 11 V 11111 H Illlllllll Illlllllll
-------
Subject Index
-------
Subject Index Sample Entry
Documents in this index are listed alphabetically
under various subjects.
Subject Heading -
Title -
Reference number •
•Acetic Acid
. Health Effects Assessment for 2,4,5-Trichlorophenoxy Acedic
Acid (2,4,5-T)
-See 1050
iiiiiiiL ;i
-------
SUBJECT INDEX
90 DAY STUDY
Management Review of the Superfund Pro-
gram: Implementation Plan.
See 0102
ABANDONED SITES
Evaluation of Cleanup Levels for Remedial
Action at CERCLA (Comprehensive Environ-
mental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) Sites Based on a Review of EPA
(Environmental Protection Agency) Records
of Decision.
See 1245
ABSORPTION (BIOLOGY)
Extraction of Mercury from Groundwater
Using Immobilized Algae.
See 1450
ACETIC ACID
Health Effects Assessment for 2,4,5-Trichlor-
ophenoxy Acetic Acid (2,4,5-T).
See 1050
ACETONE
Updated Health Effects Assessment for Ace-
tone.
See 1080
ACID MINE DRAINAGE
Handbook for Constructed Wetlands Receiv-
ing Acid Mine Drainage.
See 1588
ACID VOLATILE SULFIDES
Acid Volatile Sulfide Predicts the Acute Tox-
icity of Cadmium and Nickel in Sediments.
See 1572
ADIPOSE TISSUE
Identification of SARA (Superfund Amend-
ments and Reauthorization Act) Compounds
in Adipose Tissue.
See 1055
ADMINISTRATIVE PERSONNEL
Authorization for Regional Administrators to
Approve Consistency Exemptions at NPL
Sites.
See 0998
ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES
Presumptive Remedies: Policy and Proce-
dures.
See 1103
Superfund Administrative Improvements:
Reinventing Superfund.
See 0312
AEROBIC PROCESSES
Evaluation and Testing of a Protocol to De-
termine the Aerobic Degradation Potential of
Hazardous Waste Constituents in Soil.
See 1503
Guide for Conducting Treatability Studies
under CERCLA: Aerobic Biodegradation
Remedy Screening.
See 1156
Guide for Conducting Treatability Studies
under CERCLA: Aerobic Biodegradation
Remedy Screening. Interim Guidance.
See 1157
Guide for Conducting Treatability Studies
under CERCLA: Aerobic Biodegradation
Remedy Screening. Quick Reference Fact
Sheet.
See 1158
AIR ACTION LEVELS
Air/Superfund National Technical Guidance
Study Series: Evaluation of Short-Term Air
Action Levels for Superfund Sites.
See 1386
AIR FLOW
In situ Soil Vapor Extraction Treatment.
See 1511
AIR FORCE FACILITIES
Installation Restoration Program Technical
Support Document for Record of Decision,
Tatalina Air Force Station LRRS Site.
See 1277
AIR PATHWAY ANALYSIS
Engineering Bulletin: Air Pathway Analysis.
See 1404
AIR POLLUTION
Air/Superfund National Technical Guidance
Study Series. Development of Example Pro-
cedures for Evaluating the Air Impacts of
Soil Excavation Associated with Superfund
Remedial Actions.
See 1380
Air/Superfund National Technical Guidance
Study Series. Emission Factors for Super-
fund Remediation Technologies.
See 1381
Air/Superfund National Technical Guidance
Study Series. Volume 1. Application of Air
Pathway Analyses for Superfund Activities.
See 1390
Air/Superfund National Technical Guidance
Study Series. Volume 2. Estimation of Base-
line Air Emissions at Superfund Sites (Re-
vised).
See 1392
Air/Superfund National Technical Guidance
Study Series. Volume 4. Procedures for Dis-
persion Modeling and Air Monitoring for Su-
perfund Air Pathway Analysis.
See 1394
Engineering Bulletin: Air Pathway Analysis.
See 1404
Environmental Asbestos Assessment
Manual. Superfund Method for the Determi-
nation of Asbestos in Ambient Air. Part 1.
Method.
See 1027
Environmental Asbestos Assessment
Manual. Superfund Method for the Determi-
nation of Asbestos in Ambient Air. Part 2.
Technical Background Document.
See 1028
Estimating VOC Emissions from Superfund
Sites in the Houston-Galveston Texas Area.
(NNEMS Project No. 1302).
See 1406
Evaluation of Portable Gas Chromatographs.
See 1479
Guidance on Applying the Data Quality Ob-
jectives Process for Ambient Air Monitoring
Around Superfund Sites (Stage 3).
See 0987
Guidance on Applying the Data Quality Ob-
jectives Process for Ambient Air Monitoring
Around Superfund Sites (Stages 1 and 2).
See 0988
Superfund Guide: Clean Air Act Hazardous
Air Pollutants Added to the List of CERCLA
Hazardous Substances.
See 1151
AIR POLLUTION ABATEMENT
Air/Superfund National Technical Guidance
Study Series: Estimation of Air Impacts for
Soil Vapor Extraction (SVE) Systems.
See 1383
ARARs Fact Sheet: Compliance with the
Clean Air Act and Associated Air Quality Re-
quirements.
See 0397
SITE Demonstration of the American Com-
bustion Pyretron Oxygen-Enhanced Burner.
See 1299
AIR POLLUTION CONTROL
Air Stripping of Aqueous Solutions. Engineer-
ing Bulletin.
See 1371
Air/Superfund National Technical Guidance
Study Series. Models for Estimating Air
Emission Rates from Superfund Remedial
Actions.
See 1388
CERCLA Removal Actions at Methane Re-
lease Sites.
See 0416
Contingency Analysis Modeling for Super-
fund Sites and Other Sources.
See 1219
Control of Air Emissions from Materials Han-
dling during Remediation. Engineering Bulle-
tin.
See 1398
Demonstration of a Trial Excavation at the
McColl Superfund Site.
See 1226
Evaluation of Emission Factors for Formal-
dehyde from Certain Wood Processing Oper-
ations. Final Report, May-August 1989.
See 1410
Operations and Research at the U.S. EPA
Incineration Research Facility: Annual
Report for FY91.
See 1484
Pilot-Scale Incineration of Contaminated Soil
from the Chemical Insecticide Corporation
Superfund Site.
See 1523
Control of Transient Incinerator Emissions
with an Oxygen Based Combustion System.
See 1401
Engineered Biofilter for Removing Organic
Contaminants in Air.
See 1403
Foam Scrubbing (Chapter 9).
See 1411
Incineration Treatment of Arsenic-Contami-
nated Soil.
See 1268
Pilot-Scale Incinerability Evaluation of Ar-
senic-and Lead-Contaminated Soils from
Two Superfund Sites.
See 1288
Site Emerging Technologies: Bioscrubber for
Removing Hazardous Organic Emissions
from Soil, Water and Air Decontamination
Processes.
See 1302
AIR POLLUTION CONTROL EQUIPMENT
Control of Air Emissions from Superfund Air
Strippers at Superfund Groundwater Sites.
See 1399
Control of Air Emissions from Superfund
Sites.
See 1400
Incineration Data on Arsenic and Lead Emis-
sions.
See 1267
Operations and Research at the U.S. EPA
Incineration Research. Facility: Annual
Report for FY89.
See 1482
Operations and Research at the U.S. EPA
Incineration Research Facility: Annual
Report for FY90.
See 1483
Potential Surrogate Metals for Incinerator
Trial Burns.
See 1486
SITE Demonstration of the American Com-
bustion Pyretron Oxygen-Enhanced Burner.
See 1299
SU-1
-------
AIR POLLUTION DETECTION
SUBJECT INDEX
AIR POLLUTION DETECTION
;; Compendium of ERT Bald Analytical Proce-
dure*.
See 0902
• Canister-Based Method for Monitoring Toxic
VOCs In Ambient Air.
Soe 1396
Superfund Innovative Technology Evalua-
tion: The Delaware SITE Study, 1989.
See 1322
Use of a Fourier Transform Spectrometer as
a Remote Sensor at Superfund Sites.
Sea 1365
AIR POLLUTION DISPERSION
ir Comparison of ¥ Revised Area Source Algo-
rithm for the industrial Source Complex
Short Term Model and Wind Tunnel Data.
Soe 1216
Instructional Package on Regulatory Air
Quality Modeling. Part 1: Videos on the
'Guideline on Air Quality Models (Revised)'
and the Model Clearinghouse (Video).
Soe 1412
AIR POLLUTION EFFECTS (HUMANS)
Afr/Superfund National Technical Guidance
Series. Superfund Air Pathway Analyses
Review Criteria Checklists.
See 1372
Alr/Superfund National Technical Guidance
;: Study Series: Estimation of Air Impacts for
Air Stripping of Contaminated Water.
Sea 1382
AIR POLLUTION MONITORING
Air/Superfund National Technical Guidance
: Study Series. Contingency Plans at Super-
fund Sites Using Air Monitoring.
See 1378
Alr/Superfund National Technical Guidance
Study Series: Evaluation of Short-Term Air
Action Levels for Superfund Sites.
See 1386
Alr/Superfund National Technical Guidance
Study Series. Volume 1. Overview of Air
Pathway Assessments for Superfund Sites
(Revised).
See 1391
• Alr/Superfund National Technical Guidance
: i Study Series. Volume 4. Guidance for Ambi-
ent Air Monitoring at Superfund Sites (Re-
VTvWed).
See 1393
Assessing Potential Indoor Air Impacts for
Superfund Sites. Air/Superfund National
Technical Guidance Study Series.
,. S««1395
Field Standard Operating Procedures for Air
Surveillance F.S.6.P. No. 8.
See 0910
Canistor-Based Method for Monitoring Toxic
VOCs (n Ambient Air.
See 1396
Personnel Protection through Reconnais-
sance Robotics at Superfund Remedial
"- Sites,
See 1286
AIR POLLUTION MONITORS
Ak/Suporfund National Technical Guidance
Study Series: Applicability of Open Path
Monitors for Superfund.
See 1375
• Air/Superfund National Technical Guidance
Study Series: Compilation of Information on
Real-Time tor Monitoring for Use at Super-
fund Sites.
See 1377
Personal Air Sampling and Air Monitoring
Requirements under 29 CFR 1910.120.
See 0922
AIR POLLUTION SAMPLING
Air/Superfund National Technical Guidance
Series. Superfund Air Pathway Analyses
Review Criteria Checklists.
See 1372
Air/Superfund National Technical Guidance
Study Series. Air Emissions from Area
Sources: Estimating Soil and Soil-Gas
Sample Number Requirements.
See 1373
Air/Superfund National Technical Guidance
Study Series. Database of Emission Rate
Measurement Projects.
See 1379
Air Superfund National Technical Guidance
Study Series. Estimation of Air Impacts for
the Excavation of Contaminated Soil.
See 1384
Air/Superfund National Technical Guidance
Study Series. Guideline for Predictive Base-
line Emissions Estimation Procedures for Su-
perfund Sites.
See 1387
Air Superfund National Technical Guidance
Study Series. Screening Procedures for Esti-
mating the Air Impacts of Incineration at Su-
perfund Sites.
See 1389
Compendium of ERT Air Sampling Proce-
dures.
See 0901
Design Considerations for Ambient Air Moni-
toring at Superfund Sites. Engineering Bulle-
tin.
See 1402
Measurement of Volatile Organic Com-
pounds during Start-Up of Bioremediation of
French Limited Superfund Site in Crosby
Texas Using Wind Dependent Whole-Air
Sampling.
See 1414
Operations and Research at the U.S. EPA
Incineration Research Facility: Annual
Report for FY89.
See 1482
Comparison: Organic Emissions from Haz-
ardous Waste Incinerators versus the 1990
Toxics Release Inventory Air Releases.
See 1217
Review and Evaluation of Area Source Dis-
persion Algorithms for Emission Sources at
Superfund Sites.
See 1416
Sector Sampling for VOC's during Remedi-
ation of Superfund Site at Shaver's Farm,
Georgia.
See 1417
Superfund Innovative Technology Evalua-
tion: The Delaware SITE Study, 1989.
See 1322
AIR QUALITY
Review and Evaluation of Area Source Dis-
persion Algorithms for Emission Sources at
Superfund Sites.
See 1416
AIR SAMPLERS
Canister-Based Method for Monitoring Toxic
VOCs in Ambient Air.
See 1396
AIR SPARGING
Citizen's Guide to Air Sparging.
See 0452
AIR STRIPPING
Air Stripping of Aqueous Solutions. Engineer-
ing Bulletin.
See 1371
ALABAMA
National Priorities List Sites: Alabama.
See 0148
National Priorities List Sites: Alabama.
See 0149
National Priorities List Sites: Alabama, 1992.
See 0150
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Alabama.
See 0621
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Alabama.
See 0622
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Alabama.
See 0623
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP National Listing by Site.
See 0833
ALASKA
National Priorities List Sites: Alaska.
See 0151
National Priorities List Sites: Alaska.
See 0152
National Priorities List Sites: Alaska, 1992.
See 0153
ALGAE
Extraction of Mercury from Groundwater
Using Immobilized Algae.
See 1450
ALGASORB
Extraction of Mercury from Groundwater
Using Immobilized Algae.
See 1450
ALGORITHMS
Comparison of a Revised Area Source Algo-
rithm for the Industrial Source Complex
Short Term Model and Wind Tunnel Data.
See 1216
ALTERNATIVE REMEDIAL CONTRACT
STRATEGY
ARCS (Alternative Remedial Contract Strate-
gy) Contracts Users' Manual.
See 0019
ARCS Work Assignment Management: Field
Guide.
See 0021
ALTERNATIVE REMEDIAL CONTRACTING
STRATEGY
Initiatives to Streamline the Alternative Re-
medial Contracting Strategy (ARCS) Con-
tracts' Award Fee Process.
See 0033
Performance Tracking under ARCS Con-
tracts.
See 0061
ALTRNATIVE REMEDIAL CONTRACTING
STRATEGY
Use of Time and Materials and Cost Reim-
bursement Subcontracts for Remedial Ac-
tions under the Alternative Remedial Con-
tracting Strategy Contracts.
See 1141
ALUMINIUM
Draft Record of Decision for the Aluminum
Smelter Conservation/Modernization Pro-
gram.
See 1087
AMBIENT AIR QUALITY
Air/Superfund National Technical Guidance
Study Series: Estimation of Air Impacts from
Area Sources of Particulate Matter Emis-
sions at Superfund Sites.
See 1385
Estimation of Air Impacts for Bioventing Sys-
tems Used at Superfund Sites. Air/Super-
fund National Technical Guidance Study
Series.
See 1407
SU-2
iiiti'
,, uii, ;; ! iiiilL 'ail .J,,.,,,,^ .":
: i::,",(!•: nil JiiiiliLsi ti;
-------
SUBJECT INDEX
ASSESSMENTS
Estimation of Air Impacts for Solidification
and Stabilization Processes Used at Super-
fund Sites. Air/Superfund National Technical
Guidance Study Series.
See 1408
Estimation of Air Impacts for Thermal De-
sorption Units Used at Superfund Sites. Air/
Superfund National Technical Guidance
Study Series.
See 1409
AMERICAN INDIANS
Revised Interim Final Guidance on Indian In-
volvement in the Superfund Program.
See 0484
AMERICAN SAMOA
National Priorities List Sites: American
Samoa, Guam, and the Trust Territories.
See 0154
National Priorities List Sites: The United
States Territories, 1992.
See 0275
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for American Samoa.
See 0624
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for American Samoa.
See 0626
AMPHIBIA
Evaluating Amphibian Responses in Wet-
lands Impacted by Mining Activities in the
Western United States.
See 1586
ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY
Inorganic Contract Compliance Screening
System (ICCSS) Software (ILM02.1 Version
2) (for Microcomputers).
See 0036
Inorganic Contract Compliance Screening
System (ICCSS) Software (ILM02.1 Version
3) (for Microcomputers).
See 0037
Inorganic Contract Compliance Screening
System (ICCSS) Software (SOW March
1990) (Version 1) (for Microcomputers).
See 0040
Inorganic Contract Compliance Screening
System Software for the PC (SOW March
1990 Version 1). User Manual.
See 0041
Organic Contract Compliance Screening
System (OCCSS) Software (OLM01.8 Ver-
sion 3) (for Microcomputers).
See 0050
Organic Contract Compliance Screening
System (OCCSS) Software (SOW February
1988) (for Microcomputers).
See 0054
Organic Contract Compliance Screening
System (OCCSS) Software (SOW March
1990) (Version 1) (for Microcomputers).
See 0055
Organic Contract Compliance Screening
System (OCCSS) Software (SOW OLM01.8
Version January 1992) (Version 1) (for
Microcomputers).
See 0056
Organic Contract Compliance Screening
System. Software for the PC (OLM01.8 Ver-
sion 1). User Manual.
See 0057
Organic Contract Compliance Screening
System. Software for the PC (SOW March
1990, Version 1). User Manual.
See 0059
Organic Contract Compliance Screening
System. Software for the PC (Version June
1990). User Manual.
See 0060
ANNELIDS
On-Site Methods for Assessing Chemical
Impact on the Soil Environment Using Earth-
worms: A Case Study at the Baird and
McGuire Superfund Site, Holbrook, Massa-
chusetts.
See 1521
APPLICABLE OR RELEVANT AND
APPROPRIATE REGULATIONS
PAST: The Potential ARARs Selection Tool.
See 0434
APPLICABLE OR RELEVANT AND
APPROPRIATE REQUIREMENTS
ARARs Q's and A's: State Ground-Water
Antidegradation Issues.
See 0402
ARARs Q's and A's: The Fund-Balancing
Waiver.
See 0403
AQUADETOX/SVE TREATMENT SYSTEM
AWD Technologies Integrated AquaDetox
(Trade Name)/SVE Technology: Applications
Analysis Report.
See 1202
U.S. EPA SITE Demonstration of AWD Tech-
nologies' AquaDetox/SVE System.
See 1363
AQUIFERS
Measurement of Hydraulic Conductivity Dis-
tributions: A Manual of Practice.
See 1467
New Approach and Methodologies for Char-
acterizing the Hydrogeologic Properties of
Aquifers.
See 1470
ARIZONA
National Priorities List Sites: Arizona and
Nevada.
See 0157
National Priorities List Sites: Arizona and
Nevada, 1992.
See 0158
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Arizona.
See 0627
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Arizona.
See 0628
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Arizona.
See 0629
ARKANSAS
National Priorities List Sites: Arkansas.
See 0159
National Priorities List Sites: Arkansas.
See 0160
National Priorities List Sites: Arkansas, 1992.
See 0161
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Arkansas.
See 0630
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Arkansas.
See 0631
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Arkansas.
See 0632
Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Clean-
up Efforts Nationwide, Spring 1993 (Old Mid-
land Products Site Profile, Yell County, Ar-
kansas).
See 0957
ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
EPA/USACE Payment Process: Direct Cite/
Revised Reimbursement Methods.
See 1126
AROMATIC COMPOUNDS
Chemical Dehalogenation Treatment: APEG
Treatment.
See 1210
Control of Aromatic Waste Air Streams by
Soil Bioreactors.
See 1496
AROMATIC POLYCYCLIC HYDROCARBONS
Technology Evaluation Report: SITE Pro-
gram. CF Systems Organics Extraction
System, New Bedford, Massachusetts.
Volume 1.
See 1346
Technology Evaluation Report: SITE Pro-
gram. CF Systems Organics Extraction
System, New Bedford, Massachusetts.
Volume 2.
See 1347
ARSENIC
Incineration Data on Arsenic and Lead Emis-
sions.
See 1267
Behavior of Arsenic in a Rotary Kiln Inciner-
ator (Journal Version).
See 1204
Superfund Fact Sheet: Arsenic.
See 0488
ASBESTOS
Environmental Asbestos Assessment
Manual. Superfund Method for the Determi-
nation of Asbestos in Ambient Air. Part 1.
Method.
See 1027
Environmental Asbestos Assessment
Manual. Superfund Method for the Determi-
nation of Asbestos in Ambient Air. Part 2.
Technical Background Document.
See 1028
Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Clean-
up Efforts Nationwide, Fall 1993 (Johns-
Manville Site Profile, Illinois).
See 0952
ASSESSMENT MONITORING
CERCLA Off-Site Policy - Eligibility of Facili-
ties in Assessment Monitoring.
See 0414
ASSESSMENTS
CERCLIS Characterization Project: National
Results.
See 0001
CERCLIS Characterization Project: Region 1
Results.
See 0002
CERCLIS Characterization Project: Region 2
Results.
See 0003
CERCLIS Characterization Project: Region 3
Results.
See 0004
CERCLIS Characterization Project: Region 4
Results.
See 0005
CERCLIS Characterization Project: Region 5
Results.
See 0006
CERCLIS Characterization Project: Region 6
Results.
See 0007
CERCLIS Characterization Project: Region 7
Results.
See 0008
CERCLIS Characterization Project: Region 8
Results.
See 0009
CERCLIS Characterization Project Region 9
Results.
See 0010
SU-3
-------
ATMOSPHERIC DIFFUSION
SUBJECT INDEX
CERCLIS Characterization Project: Region
10 Results.
S090011
ECO Update. Volume 1, Number 5. August
1992. Briefing the BTAG: Initial Description
ot Setting, History, and Ecology of a Site.
See 1023
Guidance for Performing Preliminary Assess-
ments under CERCLA.
S«e 0342
"PA Review Checklist
See 0366
ATMOSPHERIC DIFFUSION
Review and Evaluation of Area Source Dis-
, persion Algorithms for Emission Sources at
;> Supotfund Sites.
Seo 1416
AUDITING
Audit Management Process. Reference
Guide,
Se«OOS5
Audits and the Superfund Program Manager.
SaeOOee
Audits and the Superfund Program Manager.
See 0087
Health and Safety Audit Guidelines: SARA
Title I, Section 126.
See 0916
• Involvement of Superfund Program Manag-
! ars In Superfund Response Agreement
Audits.
Sea 0099
SRIS System Overview and User's Guide.
Soe0112
AUTHORIZATIONS '[ "
liAutjwrizatkOT for Regional Administrators to
Approve Consistency Exemptions at NPL
-Sites.
Sea 0998
AUTOMOUSE SYSTEM
AutoMOUSE: An Improvement to the
I MOUSE Computerized Uncertainty Analysis
System Operational Manual.
See 1201
B AND W CYCLONE FURNACE
Babcock and Wllcox Cyclone Furnace Vitrifi-
cation. Technology Demonstration Summary.
Sea 1203
BASINS (GEOGRAPHIC)
Dealing with Toxic Polluted Sediments in the
1 Great Lakes Basin.
S«e 1582
BEN MODEL
i BEN: A Model to Calculate the Economic
!' Benefit of Noncompliahce. User's Manual.
Se«0513
BENCH-SCALE EXPERIMENTS
Toxicfty Bloassay and Eluate Heavy Metals
Analysis Results of the Bench Scale Stabili-
zation Study of Soils from the United
Chrome Superfund NPL (National Priority
• Usl) Site Corvaltis, Oregon.
Sea 1546
BENEFIT COST ANALYSIS
BEN: A Model to Calculate the Economic
Benefit of Noncompliance. User's Manual.
Seo 0513
: BEN: A Model to Calculate the Economic
ii; Benefits of Noncompliance. User's Manual
(Revised).
See 1205
BEN Model: Calculates Violators' Economic
Benefits from Noncompliance (Version 4.0)
(for Microcomputers).
See 0514
BENZENE
Superfund Fact Sheet: Benzene.
Seo 0489
BENZENES
Health Effects Assessment for Benzene.
See 1035
BENZOFLUORANTHENE
Toxicological Profile for
Benzo(b)Fluoranthene.
See 1360
BEST TECHNOLOGY
Guidance Documents Relating to Landfills
and Contaminants.
See 1259
Innovative Technology: BEST Solvent Ex-
traction Process.
See 1270
BIBLIOGRAPHIES
Bibliography of Federal Reports and Publica-
tions Describing Alternative and Innovative
Treatment Technologies for Corrective
Action and Site Remediation.
See 1206
Literature Survey of Innovative Technologies
for Hazardous Waste Site Remediation,
1987-1991.
See 1281
OSWER Source Book. Volume 1. Training
and Technology Transfer Resources, 1992-
1993.
See 1284
OSWER Source Book. Volume 2. Training
and Technology Transfer Resources, 1992-
1993.
See 1285
BIOASSAY
Application of Tradescantia Micronucleus
Assay for in situ Evaluation of Potential Ge-
netic Hazards from Exposure to Chemicals
at a Wood-Preserving Site.
See 1195
Toxicological Implementations of Remediat-
ing Hazardous Wastes.
See 1359
BIODEGRADATION
Control of Aromatic Waste Air Streams by
Soil Bioreaotors.
See 1496
BIODETERIORATION
Evaluation and Testing of a Protocol to De-
termine the Aerobic Degradation Potential of
Hazardous Waste Constituents in Soil.
See 1503
Guide for Conducting Treatability Studies
under CERCLA: Aerobic Biodegradation
Remedy Screening.
See 1156
Guide for Conducting Treatability Studies
under CERCLA: Aerobic Biodegradation
Remedy Screening. Interim Guidance.
See 1157
Guide for Conducting Treatability Studies
under CERCLA: Aerobic Biodegradation
Remedy Screening. Quick Reference Fact
Sheet.
See 1158
Guide for Conducting Treatability Studies
under CERCLA: Biodegradation Remedy Se-
lection. Quick Reference Fact Sheet.
See 1160
Innovative Technology: Slurry-Phase Biode-
gradation.
See 1271
Biodegradation of Creosote and Pentachlor-
ophenol in Contaminated Groundwater:
Chemical and Biological Assessment.
See 1432
Respirometric Methods for Determination of
Biodegradability and Biodegradation Kinetics
for Hazardous Organic Pollutant Com-
pounds.
See 1427
Slurry Biodegradation.
See 1428
BIOLOGICAL EFFECTS
Biological Assessment of Toxicity Caused by
Chemical Constituents Eluted from Site Soils
Collected at the Drake Chemical Superfund
Site, Lock Haven, Clinton Co., Pennsylvania.
See 1491
Evaluation of Terrestrial Indicators for Use in
Ecological Assessments at Hazardous
Waste Sites.
See 1249
Health Effects Assessment Summary
Tables.
See 1051
Health Effects Assessment Summary
Tables.
See 1052
Health Effects Assessment Summary
Tables.
See 1053
Health Effects Assessment Summary Tables
Fourth Quarter FY 1989.
See 1054
Application of Tradescantia Micronuoleus
Assay for In situ Evaluation of Potential Ge-
netic Hazards from Exposure to Chemicals
at a Wood-Preserving Site.
See 1195
Development and Use of Site-Specific
Chemical and Biological Criteria for Assess-
ing New Bedford Harbor Pilot Dredging
Project.
See 1583
BIOLOGICAL INDICATORS
On-Site Methods for Assessing Chemical
Impact on the Soil Environment Using Earth-
worms: A Case Study at the Baird and
McGuire Superfund Site, Holbrook, Massa-
chusetts.
See 1521
BIOLOGICAL INDUSTRIAL WASTE
TREATMENT
EPA SITE Demonstration of the BioTrol Soil
Washing Process.
See 1502
BIOLOGICAL MARKERS
Evaluation of Exposure Markers.
See 1246
BIOLOGICAL RECOVERY
Emerging Technologies: Bio-Recovery Sys-
tems Removal and Recovery of Metal Ions
from Groundwater.
See 1439
Emerging Technologies: Bio-Recovery Sys-
tems Removal and Recovery of Metal Ions
from Groundwater. Appendices.
See 1440
BIOLOGICAL TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE
GROUPS
ECO Update: The Role of BTAGs in Ecologi-
cal Assessment. Volume 1, Number 1, Sep-
tember 1991.
See 1020
BIOLOGICAL TREATMENT
Alternative Biological Treatment Processes
for Remediation of Creosote-and PCP-Con-
taminated Materials: Bench-Scale Treatabil-
ity Studies.
See 1418
Bioremediation: An Information Update on
Applying Bioremediation to Site Cleanup.
See 1421
SU-4
-------
SUBJECT INDEX
CERCLA
Bioremediation in the Field. An Information
Update on Applying Bioremediation to Site
Clean-Up. Number 3.
See 1422
Bioremediation in the Field: An Information
Update on Applying Bioremediation to Site
Cleanup. (Number 4).
See 1423
Bioremediation in the Field: Number 1, No-
vember 1990.
See 1424
BioTrol Soil Washing System for Treatment
of a Wood Preserving Site: Applications
Analysis Report.
See 1492
Evaluation and Testing of a Protocol to De-
termine the Aerobic Degradation Potential of
Hazardous Waste Constituents in Soil.
See 1503
In-situ Bioremediation of Contaminated
Ground Water.
See 1465
Measurement of Volatile Organic Com-
pounds during Start-Up of Bioremediation of
French Limited Superfund Site in Crosby
Texas Using Wind Dependent Whole-Air
Sampling.
See 1414
Bench-Scale Evaluation of Alternative Bio-
logical Treatment Processes for the Remedi-
ation of Pentachlorophenol- and Creosote-
Contaminated Materials: Slurry-Phase Biore-
mediation.
See 1419
Bench-Scale Evaluation of Alternative Bio-
logical Treatment Processes for the Remedi-
ation of Pentachlorophenol- and Creosote-
Contaminated Materials: Solid-Phase Biore-
mediation.
See 1420
Biodegradation of Creosote and Pentachlor-
ophenol in Contaminated Groundwater:
Chemical and Biological Assessment.
See 1432
EPA Site Demonstration of BioTrol Aqueous
Treatment System.
See 1441
Extraction of Mercury from Groundwater
Using Immobilized Algae.
See 1450
Respirometric Methods for Determination of
Biodegradability and Biodegradation Kinetics
for Hazardous Organic Pollutant Com-
pounds.
See 1427
Rotating Biological Contactors. Engineering
Bulletin.
See 1297
Technology Evaluation Report: Biotrol Soil
Washing System for Treatment of a Wood
Preserving Site. Volume 1.
See 1539
Technology Evaluation Report: Biotrol Soil
Washing System for Treatment of a Wood
Preserving Site. Volume 2, Part A.
See 1540
Technology Evaluation Report: Biotrol Soil
Washing System for Treatment of a Wood
Preserving Site. Volume 2, Part B.
See 1541
Technology Evaluation Report: Pilot-Scale
Demonstration of a Slurry-Phase Biological
Reactor for Creosote-Contaminated Soil.
Volume 1.
See 1542
Technology Evaluation Report: Toronto Har-
bour Commissioners (THC) Soil Recycle
Treatment Train.
See 1543
Understanding Bioremediation: A Guidebook
for Citizens.
See 0507
BIOREACTORS
On-Site Engineering Report of the Slurry-
Phase Biological Reactor for Pilot-Scale
Testing on Contaminated Soil.
See 1520
BIOREMEDIATION
Bioremediation in the Field: An Information
Update on Applying Bioremediation to Site
Cleanup. (Number 4).
See 1423
Bioremediation Resource Guide and Biore-
mediation Resource Matrix.
See 1425
Guide for Conducting Treatability Studies
under CERCLA: Biodegradation Remedy Se-
lection. Interim Guidance.
See 1159
In situ Bioremediation of Contaminated Un-
saturated Subsurface Soils.
See 1509
Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Clean-
up Efforts Nationwide, Spring 1993 (French
Limited Site Profile, Harris County, Texas).
See 0954
Use of Office of Research and Develop-
ment's Bioremediation Expertise in Super-
fund Removal Program.
See 1016
BIOTROL AQUEOUS TREATMENT SYSTEM
EPA Site Demonstration of BioTrol Aqueous
Treatment System.
See 1441
EPA SITE Demonstration of the BioTrol Soil
Washing Process.
See 1502
BIOTROL SOIL WASHERS
BioTrol Soil Washing System for Treatment
of a Wood Preserving Site: Applications
Analysis Report.
See 1492
EPA SITE Demonstration of the BioTrol Soil
Washing Process.
See 1502
BIOTROL SOIL WASHING SYSTEM
Technology Demonstration Summary: Bio
Trol Soil Washing System for Treatment of a
Wood Preserving Site.
See 1538
Technology Evaluation Report: Biotrol Soil
Washing System for Treatment of a Wood
Preserving Site. Volume 1.
See 1539
Technology Evaluation Report: Biotrol Soil
Washing System for Treatment of a Wood
Preserving Site. Volume 2, Part A.
See 1540
Technology Evaluation Report: Biotrol Soil
Washing System for Treatment of a Wood
Preserving Site. Volume 2, Part B.
See 1541
BIOVENTING
Estimation of Air Impacts for Bioventing Sys-
tems Used at Superfund Sites. Air/Super-
fund National Technical Guidance Study
Series.
See 1407
BOSTON (MASSACHUSETTS)
Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Clean-
up Efforts Nationwide, Summer 1993
(Common Steps in the Removal Process).
See 0965
BOTTLE REPOSITORIES
Decentralization of Superfund Bottle Reposi-
tory Functions.
See 0985
BOTTOM SEDIMENTS
Handbook: Responding to Discharges of
Sinking Hazardous Substances.
See 1589
BRANT (NEW YORK)
Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Clean-
up Efforts Nationwide, Fall 1992. (Wide
Beach Section of Brant, New York).
See 0948
BULLITT COUNTY (KENTUCKY)
Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Clean-
up Efforts Nationwide, Fall 1992. (Valley of
the Drums, Bullitt County, Kentucky).
See 0947
BUREAU OF RECLAMATION
U.S. Bureau of Reclamation Assistance to
the Superfund Program.
See 1138
BUSINESSES
CERCLA Off-Site Policy - Eligibility of Facili-
ties in Assessment Monitoring.
See 0414
CADMIUM
Health Effects Assessment for Cadmium.
See 1036
Acid Volatile Sulfide Predicts the Acute Tox-
icity of Cadmium and Nickel in Sediments.
See 1572
CALIFORNIA
National Priorities List Sites: California.
See 0162
National Priorities List Sites: California and
Hawaii.
See 0163
National Priorities List Sites: California and
Hawaii, 1992.
See 0164
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for California.
See 0633
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for California.
See 0634
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for California.
See 0635
CANS
Canister-Based Method for Monitoring Toxic
VOCs in Ambient Air.
See 1396
CAPACITY
CERCLA Waste Capacity Assurance.
See 0131
CAPACITY ASSURANCE PLANS
Guidance for Capacity Assurance Planning.
Capacity Planning Pursuant to CERCLA Sec-
tion 104(c)(9).
See 0137
CARBON TETRACHLORIDE
Health Effects Assessment for Carbon Tet-
rachloride.
See 1037
CARVER-GREENFIELD PROCESS
Carver-Greenfield Process (Trade Name)
Dehydro-Tech Corporation. Applications
Analysis Report.
See 1207
CASE STUDIES
Procedural Guidance on Treatment of Insur-
ers under CERCLA.
See 0589
CASHOUT SETTLEMENTS
Interim Cashout Settlement Procedures.
See 0558
CERCLA
CERCLA/Superfund Orientation Manual.
See 0130
SU-5
-------
CERCLA (COMPREHENSIVE ENVIRONMENTAL
RESPONSE COMPENSATION AND LIABILITY ACT)
('.'Lit '!' ' ":• '''.T.H ' • .L
SUBJECT INDEX
CERCLA (COMPREHENSIVE
ENVIRONMENTAL RESPONSE
COMPENSATION AND LIABILITY ACT)
CERCLIS Characterization Project: Region 1
Results,
See 0002
CERCLIS Characterization Project: Region 2
Results.
See 0003
CERCLA INFORMATION SYSTEM (CERCLIS)
CERCLIS Characterization Project: National
Results,
Sea 0001
CERCLIS Characterization Project Region 3
Results,
Sao 0004
CERCLIS Characterization Project: Region 4
Results.
SooOOOS
CERCLIS Characterization Project: Region 5
Results.
Sea 0006
QERCLIS Characterization Project: Region 6
Results.
See 0007
CERCLIS Characterization Project Region 7
Results,
SoaOOOS
OERCLIS Characterization Project Region 8
Results.
See 0009
CERCLIS Characterization Project: Region 9
Rosuils.
Sea 0010
CERCLIS Characterization Project Region
10 Results.
See 0011
CERCLIS (CERCLA INFORMATION SYSTEM)
CERCLIS Characterization Project Region 1
Results,
Sea 0002
CERCLIS Characterization Project: Region 2
Results.
Sea 0003
CHEMFIX PROCESS
Chemflx Technologies, Inc. Solidification/
Stabilization Process. Application Analysis
See 1551
SJTE, Demonstration of the CHEMFIX Solidi-
(icafon/Stabilization Process at the Portable
Equipment Salvage Company Site.
Soe 1559
Technology Evaluation Report CHEMFIX
Technologies, Inc., Solidification/Stabiliza-
tion Process, Clackamas, Oregon. Volume 2.
Soo 1339
Technology Evaluation Report: Chemfix
Technologies, Inc. Solidification/Stabilization
Process, Clackamas, Oregon. Volume 1.
See 1566
CHEMICAL ANALYSIS
Assessment of Tentatively Identified Com-
pounds in Superfund Samples.
Sea 1199
Chemical Dehalogenation Treatability Stud-
ies under CERCLA: An Overview.
See 1153
Etivlfonmental Asbestos Assessment
Manual. Superfund Method for the Determi-
nation of Asbestos In Ambient Air. Part 2.
.Technical Background Document.
See 1028
International Symposium on Reid Screening
Methods for Hazardous Wastes and Toxic
'Chemicals (2nd), Proceedings. Held in Las
Vegas, Nevada on February 12-14, 1991.
Sea 1279
Evaluation of Modifications to Extraction Pro-
cedures Used in Analysis of Environmental
Samples from Superfund Sites.
See 1247
Technology Evaluation Report: SITE Pro-
gram. CF Systems Organics Extraction
System, New Bedford, Massachusetts.
Volume 2.
See 1347
Toxicity Bioassay and Eluate Heavy Metals
Analysis Results of the Bench Scale Stabili-
zation Study of Soils from the United
Chrome Superfund NPL (National Priority
List) Site Corvallis, Oregon.
See 1546
USEPA Contract Laboratory Program Nation-
al Functional Guidelines for Organic Data
Review.
See 0077
User's Guide to the Contract Laboratory Pro-
gram.
See 0079
CHEMICAL COMPOUNDS
Biological Assessment of Toxicity Caused by
Chemical Constituents Eluted from Site Soils
Collected at the Drake Chemical Superfund
Site, Lock Haven, Clinton Co., Pennsylvania.
See 1491
Health Effects Assessment Summary
Tables.
See 1051
Health Effects Assessment Summary
Tables.
See 1052
Health Effects Assessment Summary
Tables.
See 1053
Health Effects Assessment Summary Tables
Fourth Quarter FY 1989.
See 1054
Limited-Use Chemical Protective Clothing for
EPA Superfund Activities.
See 1058
Estimation of the Cost of Using Chemical
Protective Clothing.
See 1244
On-Site Methods for Assessing Chemical
Impact on the Soil Environment Using Earth-
worms: A Case Study at the Baird and
McGuire Superfund Site, Holbrook, Massa-
chusetts.
See 1521
CHEMICAL LABORATORIES
Guidelines for the Cleanup of Clandestine
Drug Laboratories.
See 1007
CHEMICAL PROPERTIES
Superfund Fact Sheet: Arsenic.
See 0488
CHEMICAL SPILLS
Treatment of Nonhazardous Petroleum-Con-
taminated Soils by Thermal Desorption
Technologies.
See 1547
CHEMICAL STABILIZATION
Evaluation of Waste Stabilized by the Solidi-
tech SITE Technology.
See 1554
Soliditech, Inc. Solidification/Stabilization
Process: Applications Analysis Report.
See 1562
Technology Evaluation Report CHEMFIX
Technologies, Inc., Solidification/Stabiliza-
tion Process, Clackamas, Oregon. Volume 2.
See 1339
Technology Evaluation Report: Chemfix
technologies, Inc. Solidification/Stabilization
Process, Clackamas, Oregon. Volume 1.
See 1566
CHEMICAL TREATMENT
Chemical Dehalogenation Treatment: APEG
Treatment.
See 1210
Chemical Oxidation Treatment. Engineering
Bulletin.
See 1211
Developments in Chemical Treatment .of
Contaminated Soil.
See 1499
Guide for Conducting Treatability Studies
under CERCLA: Chemical Dehalogenation.
See 1161
Technology Evaluation Report: Toronto Har-
bour Commissioners (THC) Soil Recycle
Treatment Train.
See 1543
CHEMICAL WASTE SITES
Application of a Plant Test System in the
Identification of Potential Genetic Hazards at
Chemical Waste Sites.
See 1194
CHEMICAL WASTES
Chemical Waste Management, Inc.
PO*WW*ER (Trade Name) Evaporation-
Catalytic Oxidation Technology. Technology
Evaluation Report. Volume 1.
See 1213
Chemical Waste Management, Inc.
PO*WW*ER (Trade Name) Evaporation-
Catalytic Oxidation Technology. Technology
Evalution Report. Volume 2.
See 1214
CHEMICAL WATER POLLUTANTS
Superfund Innovative Technology Evaluation
Program Demonstration Plan for Westing-
house Bio-Analytic Systems Pentachloro-
phenol Immunoassays.
See 1310
CHLORDANE
Health Effects Assessment for Chlordane.
See 1038
CHLORINE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS
Guidance on Remedial Actions for Super-
fund Sites with PCB Contamination.
See 1260
CHLOROBENZENES
Health Effects Assessment for Chloroben-
zene.
See 1039
CHLOROFORM
Health Effects Assessment for Chloroform.
See 1040
CHLOROMETHANES
Health Effects Assessment for Methylene
Chloride.
See 1043
CHROMATOGRAPHIC ANALYSIS
Evaluation of Commercially-Available Porta-
ble Gas Chromatographs.
See 1478
CHROMIUM
Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Clean-
up Efforts Nationwide, Spring 1993 (United
Chrome Products Site Profile).
See 0961
Toxicity Bioassay and Eluate Heavy Metals
Analysis Results of the Bench Scale Stabili-
zation Study of Soils from the United
Chrome Superfund NPL (National Priority
List) Site Corvallis, Oregon.
See 1546
SU-6
-------
SUBJECT INDEX
CLEANUP
CHROMIUM PLATING
Use of 'Selenastrum capricornutum' to
Assess the Toxicity Potential of Surface and
Ground Water Contamination Caused by
Chromium Waste.
See 1367
CIRCULATING BED COMBUSTOR
Technology Evaluation Report: Ogden Circu-
lating Bed Combustor at the McColl Super-
fund Site.
See 1344
CITIZEN PARTICIPATION
Citizens' Guidance Manual for the Technical
Assistance Grant Program.
See 0463
Community Relations: Use of Senior Envi-
ronmental Employees in Superfund (Super-
fund Management Review: Recommendation
43.K.L).
See 0088
Proposed Method to Evaluate the Effective-
ness of Community Involvement in Super-
fund (Superfund Management Review: Rec-
ommendation Number 43.A).
See 0109
Role of Community Interviews in the Devel-
opment of a Community Relations Program
for Remedial Response.
See 0485
Superfund Fact Sheet: Public Involvement.
See 0493
Superfund: Report of the EPA Superfund
Revitalization Public Meeting Held on June
24,1992. Volumes 1 and 2.
See 0333
CLACKAMAS (OREGON)
Superfund Innovative Technology Evaluation
Technology Demonstration Summary: Chem-
fix Solidification/Stabilization Process, Clack-
amas, Oregon.
See 1564
CLEAN UP
Furthering the Use of Innovative Treatment
Technologies in OSWER Programs.
See 1256
CLEAN-UP OPERATIONS
Terra Vac In situ Vacuum Extraction System:
Applications Analysis Report.
See 1356
CLEANING
Specifications and Guidance for Contami-
nant-Free Sample Containers.
See 0994
CLEANUP
Bioremediation in the Field: An Information
Update on Applying Bioremediation to Site
Cleanup. (Number 4).
See 1423
Cleanup Information Bulletin Board System
Users Guide. (CLU-IN: Cleanup Information
Bulletin Board).
See 1215
Conducting Non-Time-Critical Removal Ac-
tions under CERCLA.
See 0999
Covenants Not to Sue under SARA.
See 0526
Determining Soil Response Action Levels
Based on Potential Contaminant Migration to
Ground Water: A Compendium of Examples.
See 1497
Emergency Response Cleanup Services
Contracts (ERGS). Users Manual.
See 0024
Homeowners Exempted from Superfund
Cleanup Costs: National Policy Overview.
See 0426
National Priorities List Sites: Alabama.
See 0148
National Priorities List Sites: Alabama.
See 0149
National Priorities List Sites: Alabama, 1992.
See 0150
National Priorities List Sites: Alaska.
See 0151
National Priorities List Sites: Alaska.
See 0152
National Priorities List Sites: Alaska, 1992.
See 0153
National Priorities List Sites: American
Samoa, Guam, and the Trust Territories.
See 0154
National Priorities List Sites: American
Samoa, Guam and Trust Territories.
See 0155
National Priorities List Sites: Arizona and
Nevada.
See 0156
National Priorities List Sites: Arizona and
Nevada.
See 0157
National Priorities List Sites: Arizona and
Nevada, 1992.
See 0158
National Priorities List Sites: Arkansas.
See 0159
National Priorities List Sites: Arkansas.
See 0160
National Priorities List Sites: Arkansas, 1992.
See 0161
National Priorities List Sites: California.
See 0162
National Priorities List Sites: California and
Hawaii.
See 0163
National Priorities List Sites: California and
Hawaii, 1992.
See 0164
National Priorities List Sites: Colorado.
See 0165
National Priorities List Sites: Colorado.
See 0166
National Priorities List Sites: Colorado, 1992.
See 0167
National Priorities List Sites: Connecticut.
See 0168
National Priorities List Sites: Connecticut.
See 0169
National Priorities List Sites: Connecticut,
1992.
See 0170
National Priorities List Sites: Delaware.
See 0171
National Priorities List Sites: Delaware.
See 0172
National Priorities List Sites: Delaware, 1992.
See 0173
National Priorities List Sites: Florida.
See 0174
National Priorities List Sites: Florida.
See 0175
National Priorities List Sites: Florida, 1992.
See 0176
National Priorities List Sites: Georgia.
See 0177
National Priorities List Sites: Georgia.
See 0178
National Priorities List Sites: Georgia, 1992.
See 0179
National Priorities List Sites: Hawaii.
See 0180
National Priorities List Sites: Idaho.
See 0181
National Priorities List Sites: Idaho.
See 0182
National Priorities List Sites: Idaho, 1992.
See 0183
National Priorities List Sites: Illinois.
See 0184
National Priorities List Sites: Illinois.
See 0185
National Priorities List Sites: Illinois, 1992.
See 0186
National Priorities List Sites: Indiana.
See 0187
National Priorities List Sites: Indiana.
See 0188
National Priorities List Sites: Indiana, 1992.
See 0189
National Priorities List Sites: Iowa.
See 0190
National Priorities List Sites: Iowa.
See 0191
National Priorities List Sites: Iowa, 1992.
See 0192
National Priorities List Sites: Kansas.
See 0193
National Priorities List Sites: Kansas.
See 0194
National Priorities List Sites: Kansas, 1992.
See 0195
National Priorities List Sites: Kentucky.
See 0196
National Priorities List Sites: Kentucky.
See 0197
National Priorities List Sites: Kentucky, 1992.
See 0198
National Priorities List Sites: Louisiana.
See 0199
National Priorities List Sites: Louisiana.
See 0200
National Priorities List Sites: Louisiana, 1992.
See 0201
National Priorities List Sites: Maine.
See 0202
National Priorities List Sites: Maine.
See 0203
National Priorities List Sites: Maine, 1992.
See 0204
National Priorities List Sites: Maryland.
See 0205
National Priorities List Sites: Maryland.
See 0206
National Priorities List Sites: Maryland, 1992.
See 0207
National Priorities List Sites: Massachusetts.
See 0208
National Priorities List Sites: Massachusetts.
See 0209
National Priorities List Sites: Massachusetts,
1992.
See 0210
National Priorities List Sites: Michigan.
See 0211
National Priorities List Sites: Michigan.
See 0212
National Priorities List Sites: Michigan, 1992.
See 0213
National Priorities List Sites: Minnesota.
See 0214
National Priorities List Sites: Minnesota.
See 0215
National Priorities List Sites: Minnesota,
1992.
See 0216
National Priorities List Sites: Mississippi.
See 0217
National Priorities List Sites: Mississippi.
See 0218
National Priorities List Sites: Mississippi,
1992.
See 0219
National Priorities List Sites: Missouri.
See 0220
National Priorities List Sites: Missouri.
See 0221
SU-7
-------
CLEANUP
SUBJECT INDEX
National Priorities Ust Sites: Missouri, 1992.
Sea 0222
National Priorities Ust Sites: Montana.
Sea 0223
National Priorities List Sites: Montana.
Sea 0224
National Priorities Ust Sites: Montana, 1992.
Sea 0225
National Priorities Ust Sites: Nebraska.
Sea 0226
National Priorities Ust Sites: Nebraska.
Sea 0227
National Priorities, List Sites: Nebraska,
'^992,
See 0228
.National Priorities Ust Sites: New Hamp-
shire,
Sea 0229
National Priorities List Sites: New Hamp-
shire.
See 0230
National Priorities Ust Sites: New Hamp-
shire, 1992.
Sea 0231
National Priorities Ust Sites: New Jersey.
See 0232
National Priorities Ust Sites: New Jersey.
"Sa«0233
National Priorities Ust Sites: New Jersey,
1992.
See 0234
National Priorities Ust_Sites: New Mexico.
See 0235
National Priorities Ust Sites: New Mexico.
See 0236
National Priorities Ust Sites: New Mexico,
1992,
Sea 023?
National Priorities Ust Sites: New York.
Sea 0238
National Priorities Ust Sites: New York.
See 0239
National Priorities Ust Sites: New York,
L.1.882.
See 0240
National Priorities Ust Sites: North and
South Dakota.
Sea 0241
National Priorities Ust Sites: North and
South Dakota, 1992.
See 0242
National Priorities List Sites: North Carolina.
Sea 0243
National Priorities Ust Sites: North Carolina.
See 0244
National Priorities Ust Sites: North Carolina,
1992.
See 0245
National Priorities Ust Sites: North Dakota
! and South Dakota!
See 0246
National Priorities Ust Sites: Ohio.
Sea 0247
National Priorities Ust Sites: Ohio.
See 0248
National Priorities List Sites: Ohio, 1992.
"Sod 0249
National Priorities List Sites: Oklahoma.
Sea 0250
National Priorities Ust Sites: Oklahoma.
Sea 0251
National Priorities Ust Sites: Oklahoma,
1992,
Sea 0252
, National Priorities Ust Sites: Oregon.
See 0253
National Priorities Ust Sites: Oregon.
SOT 0254
National Priorities Ust Sites: Oregon, 1992.
See 0255
SU-8
National Priorities Ust Sites: Pennsylvania.
See 0256
National Priorities List Sites: Pennsylvania.
See 0257
National Priorities List Sites: Pennsylvania,
1992.
See 0258
National Priorities List Sites: Puerto Rico.
See 0259
National Priorities List Sites: Puerto Rico.
See 0260
National Priorities List Sites: Puerto Rico and
Virgin Islands, 1992.
See 0261
National Priorities List Sites: Rhode Island.
See 0262
National Priorities List Sites: Rhode Island.
See 0263
National Priorities List Sites: Rhode Island,
1992.
See 0264
National Priorities List Sites: South Carolina.
See 0266
National Priorities List Sites: South Carolina.
See 0267
National Priorities List Sites: South Carolina,
1992.
See 0268
National Priorities List Sites: Tennessee.
See 0269
National Priorities Ust Sites: Tennessee.
See 0270
National Priorities Ust Sites: Tennessee,
1992.
See 0271
National Priorities List Sites: Texas.
See 0272
National Priorities List Sites: Texas.
See 0273
National Priorities List Sites: Texas, 1992.
See 0274
National Priorities List Sites: The United
States Territories, 1992.
See 0275
National Priorities List Sites: Utah.
See 0276
National Priorities List Sites: Utah.
See 0277
National Priorities List Sites: Utah, 1992.
See 0278
National Priorities List Sites: Vermont.
See 0279
National Priorities List Sites: Vermont.
See 0280
National Priorities List Sites: Vermont, 1992.
See 0281
National Priorities List Sites: Virginia.
See 0282
National Priorities List Sites: Virginia.
See 0283
National Priorities List Sites: Virginia, 1992.
See 0284
National Priorities Ust Sites: Washington.
See 0285
National Priorities List Sites: Washington.
See 0286
National Priorities Ust Sites: Washington,
1992.
See 0287
National Priorities Ust Sites: West Virginia.
See 0288
National Priorities List Sites: West Virginia.
See 0289
National Priorities Ust Sites: West Virginia,
1992.
See 0290
National Priorities List Sites: Wisconsin.
See 0291
National Priorities List Sites: Wisconsin.
See 0292
National' Priorities List Sites: Wisconsin,
1992.
See 0293
National Priorities List Sites: Wyoming.
See 0294
National Priorities List Sites: Wyoming.
See 0295
National Priorities List Sites: Wyoming, 1992.
See 0296
Political Subdivision Involvement in Super-
fund.
See 0480
Presentations EPA-State Soil Standards
Conference. Held in Crystal City, Virginia on
January 29,1991.
See 1524
Factors Affecting the Applicability of Plasma
Systems to the Cleanup of Superfund Sites.
See 1250
Superfund Accelerated Cleanup Model
(SACM).
See 0119
Superfund
Model
| iillll I*... |iili||i::i .ijni,,
...... :, v , i Hi! ........ i iiii, unB ...... limn L ;,ii: ;,; ; 1,5.; ; ..... •
i. iim ....... ,„ ...... m,; .................... . ,1 „ lijiiiiiiiii,. liijiiaiiii .iiiiinHiiii, ,15 iaiiiiyiii!, ,i
__, Accelerated Cleanup
(SACM) Coordination Strategy.
See 0120
Superfund and Small Waste Contributors.
See 0881
Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Clean-
up Efforts Nationwide, Fall 1993 (Bunker Hill
Site Profile, Silver Valley, Northern Idaho).
See 0951
Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Clean-
up Efforts Nationwide, Fall 1993 (Johns-
Manville Site Profile, Illinois).
See 0952
Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Clean-
up Efforts Nationwide, Summer 1993 (Army
Creek Landfill Site Profile, New Castle, Dela-
ware).
See 0962
Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Clean-
up Efforts Nationwide, Summer 1993 (Chis-
man Creek Site Profile, York County, Virgin-
ia).
See 0963
Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Clean-
up Efforts Nationwide, Summer 1993
(Common Steps in the Removal Process).
See 0965
Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Clean-
up Efforts Nationwide, Summer 1993 (East-
ern Diversified Metals Site Profile, Schuylkill
County, Pennsylvania).
See 0966
Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Clean-
up Efforts Nationwide, Summer 1993 (Fike/
Artel Chemical Site Profile, Nitro, West Vir-
ginia).
See 0967
Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Clean-
up Efforts Nationwide, Summer 1993 (North-
side Landfill Site Profile, Spokane, Washing-
ton).
See 0968
Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Clean-
up Efforts Nationwide, Summer 1993 (Rogue
Valley/Ditch Creek Ranch Site Profile,
Wimer, Oregon).
See 0969
Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Clean-
up Efforts Nationwide, Winter 1993. (Wells G
and H Site, Woburn, Massachusetts).
See 0972
Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Clean-
up Efforts Nationwide, Winter 1994 (Bailey
Waste Disposal Site Profile, Texas).
See 0973
liiniiifa,;,ii II-,!| Iiii I liJId ;iiliii,! ij!,ij, ihlil.„Hi imillliliil ,il 1 K . i1 ZMiii, II iij; ..ii'iiiBI!!.: liiiilill. .iiiil' III
-------
SUBJECT INDEX
COMMUNITY RELATIONS
Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Clean-
up Efforts Nationwide, Winter 1994 (Sey-
mour Recycling Site Profile, Seymour, Indi-
ana).
See 0975
SUPERFUND: Focusing on the Nation at
Large. A Decade of Progress at National
Priorities List Sites.
See 0321
Superfund: Focusing on the Nation at Large.
A Decade of Progress at National Priorities
List Sites.
See 0322
Superfund Strategic Plan and Implementa-
tion Strategy Fiscal Year 1994.
See 0126
Superfund Strategic Plan and Implementa-
tion Strategy Fiscal Year 1994: Office and
Division Plans.
See 0127
CLEANUP OPERATIONS
Accessing Federal Data Bases for Contami-
nated Site Clean-Up Technologies (Second
Edition).
See 1189
Assessing Sites under SACM: Interim Guid-
ance. Volume 1, Number 4, Deccember
1992.
See 0084
Bioremediation: An Information Update on
Applying Bioremediation to Site Cleanup
See 1421
Bioremediation in the Field. An Information
Update on Applying Bioremediation to Site
Clean-Up. Number 3.
See 1422
Commencement Bay Nearshore/Tideflats
Feasibility Study. Development of Sediment
Cleanup Goals.
See 1578
Commencement Bay Nearshore/Tideflats
Feasibility Study. Executive Summary.
See 1579
Commencement Bay Nearshore/Tideflats
Feasibility Study. Volume 1.
See 1580
Commencement Bay Nearshore/Tideflats
Feasibility Study. Volume 2. Appendices.
See 1581
Community Relations in Superfund: A Hand-
book.
See 0467
Early Action and Long-Term Action under
SACM: Interim Guidance, Volume 1, Number
2, December 1992.
See 0089
ECO Update. Volume 1, Number 3. The
Role of Natural Resource Trustees in the
Superfund Process.
See 1021
ECO Update. Volume 1, Number 4. Develop-
ing a Work Scope for Ecological Assess-
ments.
See 1022
Enhancing State Superfund Capabilities:
Nine-State Study.
See 0471
Evaluation of Ground-Water Extraction Rem-
edies: Phase 2. Volume 1. Summary Report.
See 1444
Evaluation of Ground-Water Extraction Rem-
edies: Phase 2. Volume 2. Case Studies and
Updates.
See 1445
Exxon Valdez Oil Spill. A Report to the
President.
See 0928
Framework for Real-Time Decision-Making:
New Bedford Harbor Pilot Dredging Study.
See 1587
Guidance on EPA Oversight of Remedial De-
signs and Remedial Actions Performed by
Potentially Responsible Parties.
See 1128
Harmonization of QA Procedures for Envi-
ronmental Data Operations: Development of
a National Consensus Standard for Quality
Assurance for Environmental Programs.
See 0989
In-situ Stabilization/Solidification of PCB
(Polychlorinated Biphenyls)-Contaminated
Soil.
See 1556
Description of EPA SITE Demonstration of
the HAZCON Stabilization Process at the
Douglassville, Pennsylvania Superfund Site.
See 1552
Evaluating the Effectiveness of Ground
Water Extraction Systems.
See 1443
SACM Regional Decision Teams: Interim
Guidance. Volume 1, Number 5, December
1992.
See 0111
Status of Key SACM Program Management
Issues: Interim Guidance, Volume 1, Number
1, December 1992.
See 0113
Superfund Accelerated Cleanup Bulletin:
Presumptive Remedies for Wood Treatment
Facilities. Volume 1, Number 2, May 1992.
See 0116
Superfund Accelerated Cleanup Bulletin.
Volume 1, Number 3. Presumptive Reme-
dies.
See 0118
Superfund Accelerated Cleanup Model
(SACM). Volume 1, Number 4, November
1992.
See 0122
Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Clean-
up Efforts Nationwide, Fall 1992. (American
Thermostat Corporation, New York).
See 0942
Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Clean-
up Efforts Nationwide, Fall 1992. (Ciba-Geigy
Corporation, Mclntosh, Alabama).
See 0944
Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Clean-
up Efforts Nationwide, Fall 1992. (Krysowaty
Farm, Hillsborough, New Jersey).
See 0945
Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Clean-
up Efforts Nationwide, Fall 1992. (Valley of
the Drums, Bullitt County, Kentucky).
See 0947
Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Clean-
up Efforts Nationwide, Fall 1992. (Wide
Beach Section of Brant, New York).
See 0948
Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Clean-
up Efforts Nationwide, Spring 1993 (French
Limited Site Profile, Harris County, Texas).
See 0954
Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Clean-
up Efforts Nationwide, Spring 1993 (Old Mid-
land Products Site Profile, Yell County, Ar-
kansas).
See 0957
Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Clean-
up Efforts Nationwide, Spring 1993 (United
Chrome Products Site Profile).
See 0961
Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Clean-
up Efforts Nationwide, Summer 1993 (Tri-
State Plating Site Profile, Columbus, Indi-
ana).
See 0970
Superfund Emergency Response Actions: A
Summary of Federally Funded Removals.
Volume 3.
See 0318
Superfund Innovative Technology Evaluation
Program: Technology Profiles, Fourth Edi-
tion.
See 1316
Superfund: Report of the EPA Superfund
Revitalization Public Meeting Held on June
24, 1992. Volumes 1 and 2.
See 0333
Technology Evaluation Report: SITE Pro-
gram. CF Systems Organics Extraction
System, New Bedford, Massachusetts.
Volume 1.
See 1346
CLEANUP TIME
Cleaning Up the Nation's Waste Sites: Mar-
kets and Technology Trends.
See 0132
COLLECTING METHODS
In-situ Stabilization/Solidification of PCB
(Polychlorinated Biphenyls)-Contaminated
Soil.
See 1556
COLORADO
National Priorities List Sites: Colorado.
See 0165
National Priorities List Sites: Colorado.
See 0166
National Priorities List Sites: Colorado, 1992.
See 0167
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Colorado.
See 0636
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Colorado.
See 0637
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Colorado.
See 0638
COMBUSTION EFFICIENCY
Control of Transient Incinerator Emissions
with an Oxygen Based Combustion System.
See 1401
Retech, Inc., Plasma Centrifugal Furnace:
Applications Analysis Report.
See 1295
COMBUSTION PRODUCTS
Comparison of Organic Emissions from Haz-
ardous Waste Incinerators versus the 1990
Toxic Release Inventory Air Releases.
See 1397
COMMENCEMENT BAY
Commencement Bay Nearshore/Tideflats
Feasibility Study. Development of Sediment
Cleanup Goals.
See 1578
Commencement Bay Nearshore/Tideflats
Feasibility Study. Executive Summary.
See 1579
Commencement Bay Nearshore/Tideflats
Feasibility Study. Volume 1.
See 1580
Commencement Bay Nearshore/Tideflats
Feasibility Study. Volume 2. Appendices.
See 1581
COMMUNITY RELATIONS
Community Relations during Enforcement
Activities and Development of the Adminis-
trative Record.
See 0465
Community Relations in Superfund: A Hand-
book.
See 0467
SU-9
-------
COMPREHENSIVE EMERGENCY RESPONSE
CLEAN-UP AND LIABILITY ACT (CERCLA)
Community Relations: Use of Senior Envi-
jrpnmental Employees In Superfund (Super-
tuna Management Review: Recommendation
43.K.L).
S««0088
; Gutda to Community Involvement for Site
'", Assessment Managers.
Sea 0476
(Mandatory Community Relations Training.
; Suparfund Management Review Implementa-
' fon Product (Recommendation: No. 43.P(i)).
S«e 0103
• planning for Sufficient Community Relations
! (Superfund Management Review: No. 43A),
J"Se«0108
ii| .proposed MaUxxTio Evaluate the Effective-
jf'nass o) Community Involvement in Super-
!,"tund (Superfund Management Review: Rec-
ommendation Number 43.A).
See 0109
Role ol Community Interviews in the Devel-
opment of a Community Relations Program
(or Remedial Response.
Sea 0485
:Superfund Responsiveness Summaries (Su-
" perfund Management Review: Recommen-
, datkm Number 43E).
Sea 0125
Using State and Local Officials to Assist in
Community Relations (Superfund Manage-
' rinent Review: Recommendation No. 43.K.L).
Soe0128
COMPREHENSIVE EMERGENCY RESPONSE
CLEAN-UP AND LIABILITY ACT (CERCLA)
inorganic Contract Compliance Screening
ji System (ICCSS) Software (for Microcomput-
etsl
See 0034
ii Inorganic Contract Compliance Screening
System (tCCSS) Software for the PC (Ver-
sion 3/90) User Manual.
Sea 0035
Organic Contract Compliance Screening
| System (OCCSS) Software (for Microcom-
I'putdrs),
Sea 0047
Organic Contract Compliance Screening
System (OCCSS) Software for the PC (Ver-
sion 2/90) User Manual.
See 0048
COMPREHENSIVE ENVIRONMENT RESPONSE
COMPENSATION AND LIABILITY ACT
Redelegation of Cfvit Judicial Settlement Au-
thorities under Delegation 14-13-B and 14-
14-E.
See 0593
Revision of CERCLA Civil Judicial Settle-
ment Authorities under Delegations 14-13-B
and 14-14-E.
See 0602
Waiver of Concurrence on Da Minimis Gen-
erator Settlements.
See 0892
COMPREHENSIVE ENVIRONMENTAL
RESPONSE
Evaluating Mixed Funding Settlements under
CEHOA
Se«0537
Notification of Hazardous Waste Sites Re-
quired Under Section 103(c) of the Compre-
;, hensfve Environmental Response, Compen-
l-i-satton and Uablly Act (CERCLA) of 1980:
EPA Region 1.
Soe 1174
"'Notification of 'Hazardous Waste Sites Re-
» quired Under Section 103(c) of the Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compen-
satlbn and Liability Act (CERCLA) of 1980:
EPA Region 2.
S*«1175
SUBJECT INDEX
Notification of Hazardous Waste Sites Re-
quired Under Section 103(c) of the Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compen-
sation and Liability Act (CERCLA) of 1980:
EPA Region 3.
See 1176
Notification of Hazardous Waste Sites Re-
quired Under Section 103(c) of the Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compen-
sation and Liability Act (CERCLA) of 1980:
EPA Region 4.
See 1177
Notification of Hazardous Waste Sites Re-
quired Under Section 103(c) of the Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compen-
sation and Liability Act (CERCLA) of 1980:
EPA Region 5.
See 1178
Notification of Hazardous Waste Sites Re-
quired Under Section 103(c) of the Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compen-
sation and Liability Act (CERCLA) of 1980:
EPA Region 6.
See 1179
Notification of Hazardous Waste Sites Re-
quired Under Section 103(c) of the Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compen-
sation and Liability Act (CERCLA) of 1980:
EPA Region 7.
See 1180
Notification of Hazardous Waste Sites Re-
quired Under Section 103(c) of the Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compen-
sation and Liability Act (CERCLA) of 1980:
EPA Region 8.
See 1181
Notification of Hazardous Waste Sites Re-
quired Under Section 103(c) of the Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compen-
sation and Liability Act (CERCLA) of 1980:
EPA Region 9.
See 1182
Notification of Hazardous Waste Sites Re-
quired Under Section 103(c) of the Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compen-
sation and Liability Act (CERCLA) of 1980:
EPA Region 10.
See 1183
Superfund Progress - Aficionado's Version
(Progress as of March 31, 1992).
See 0326
COMPREHENSIVE ENVIRONMENTAL
RESPONSE COMPENSATION AND
LIABILITIES ACT (CERCLA)
Superfund Policy Forum Update, Volume 1,
Number 1, February 1992.
See 0324
COMPREHENSIVE ENVIRONMENTAL
RESPONSE COMPENSATION AND LIABILITY
ACT
Assessing Reports of Continuous Releases
of Hazardous Substances: A Guide for EPA
Regions.
See 1142
CERCLA Compliance with Other Laws
Manual: Overview of ARARs - Focus on
ARAR Waivers.
See 0408
CERCLA Compliance with the RCRA Toxici-
ty Characteristics (TC) Rule: Part 2.
See 0412
Exemptions from the Statutory Limits on Re-
moval Actions.
See 1002
Guide for Conducting Treatability Studies
under CERCLA.
See 1154
Guide for Conducting Treatability Studies
under CERCLA: Soil Washing. Interim Guid-
ance.
See 1165
Guide for Conducting Treatability Studies
under CERCLA: Soil Washing: Quick Refer-
ence Fact Sheet.
See 1166
Political Subdivision Involvement in Super-
fund.
See 0480
Reporting Requirements for Continuous Re-
leases of Hazardous Substances: A Guide
for Facilities and Vessels on Compliance.
See 1150
Streamlining the RI/FS for CERCLA Munici-
pal Landfill Sites.
See 1119
Treatability Studies Under CERCLA: An
Overview.
See 1172
COMPREHENSIVE ENVIRONMENTAL
RESPONSE COMPENSATION AND LIABILITY
ACT (CERCLA)
CERCL1S Characterization Project: National
Results.
See 0001
CERCLJS Characterization Project: Region 3
Results.
See 0004
CERCLIS Characterization Project: Region 4
Results.
See 0005
CERCLIS Characterization Project: Region 5
Results.
See 0006
CERCLIS Characterization Project: Region 6
Results.
See 0007
CERCLIS Characterization Project: Region 7
Results.
See 0008
CERCLIS Characterization Project: Region 8
Results.
See 0009
CERCLIS Characterization Project: Region 9
Results.
See 0010
CERCLIS Characterization Project: Region
10 Results.
See 0011
COMPREHENSIVE ENVIRONMENTAL
RESPONSE COMPENSATION AND LIABILITY
ACT OF 1980
CERCLIS - WasteLAN - CleanLAN.
See 0015
COMPUTER APPLICATIONS
PREscore Software. Users Manual and Tuto-
rial. Version 1.0.
See 0374
COMPUTER PROGRAMS
Computer Models Used to Support Cleanup
Decision-Making at Hazardous and Radioac-
tive Waste Sites.
See 1218
COMPUTERIZED SIMULATION
Air/Superfund National Technical Guidance
Study Series. Air Stripper Design Manual.
See 1374
Air/Superfund National Technical Guidance
Study Series. Comparisons of Air Stripper
Simulations and Field Performance Data.
See 1376
BEN: A Model to Calculate the Economic
Benefit of Noncompliance. User's Manual.
See 0513
Contingency Analysis Modeling for Super-
fund Sites and Other Sources.
See 1219
SU-10
-------
SUBJECT INDEX
COORDINATED PROCUREMENT
Continuous Release-Emergency Response
Notification System and Priority Assessment
Model: Model Documentation.
See 1143
Continuous Release-Emergency Response
Notification System and Priority Assessment
Model: User's Manual for EPA Regions
See 1144
CONNECTICUT
National Priorities List Sites: Connecticut
See 0168
National Priorities List Sites: Connecticut.
See 0169
National Priorities List Sites: Connecticut,
1992.
See 0170
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Connecticut.
See 0639
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Connecticut.
See 0640
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Connecticut.
See 0641
CONSENT ORDERS
Transmittal of Model Consent Decree for
CERCLA Section 104(e) Information Re-
quest Enforcement Actions.
See 0888
CONSTRUCTION
NPL Construction Completion Definition at
Bioremediation and Soil Vapor Extraction
Sites.
See 0365
CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT
ARCS Construction Contract Modification
Procedures.
See 0020
Expediting Remedial Construction.
See 1127
CONTAINERS
Specifications and Guidance for Contami-
nant-Free Sample Containers.
See 0994
CONTAINMENT
Engineering Bulletin: Slurry Walls.
See 1235
Technical Guidance Document: Construction
Quality Management for Remedial Action
and Remedial Design Waste Containment
Systems.
See 1334
CONTINGENCY PLANNING
Air/Superfund National Technical Guidance
Study Series. Contingency Plans at Super-
fund Sites Using Air Monitoring.
See 1378
Contingency Analysis Modeling for Super-
fund Sites and Other Sources.
See 1219
Oil Spill Prevention, Control, and Counter-
measures Program. Task Force Report.
See 0932
CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION
ARCS (Alternative Remedial Contract Strate-
gy) Contracts Users' Manual.
See 0019
CERCLIS Data Handling Support Policy
Statement.
See 0013
Contracting and Subcontracting Guide to the
Superfund Program.
See 0023
Emergency Response Cleanup Services
Contracts (ERGS). Users Manual.
See 0024
Implementation of the Alternative Remedial
Contracting Strategy (ARCS) Task Force
Recommendations: Transmittal of the Imple-
mentation Plan.
See 0030
Inorganic Contract Compliance Screening
System (ICCSS) Software (for Microcomput-
ers).
See 0034
Inorganic Contract Compliance Screening
System (ICCSS) Software for the PC (Ver-
sion 3/90) User Manual.
See 0035
Mentor-Protege Program.
See 0044
Model Performance Standards for Superfund
Project Officers, Deputy Project Officers, and
Work Assignment Managers/Delivery Order
Officers.
See 0045
Organic Contract Compliance Screening
System (OCCSS) Software (for Microcom-
puters).
See 0047
Organic Contract Compliance Screening
System (OCCSS) Software for the PC (Ver-
sion 2/90) User Manual.
See 0048
Resources for Preparing Independent Gov-
ernment Estimates for Remedial Contracting
Work Assignments.
See 0066
Superfund Contracts Management Issues.
See 0072
Superfund Response Action Contracts.
See 0074
USAGE Preplaced and Rapid Response
Contracts.
See 1139
User's Guide to Contract Laboratory Pro-
gram.
See 0078
CONTRACT LABORATORY PROGRAM
Guidelines for Effective Management of the
Contract Laboratory Program.
See 0027
Guidelines for Effective Management of the
Contract Laboratory Program. Part 1. Con-
tract Award. Part 2. Contract Administration.
See 0028
Sampler's Guide to the Contract Laboratory
Program.
See 0071
USEPA Contract Laboratory Program Nation-
al Functional Guidelines for Inorganic Data
Review.
See 0997
User's Guide to Contract Laboratory Pro-
gram.
See 0078
User's Guide to the Contract Laboratory Pro-
gram.
See 0079
CONTRACT MANAGEMENT
Ensuring the Adequacy of Cost Share Provi-
sions in Superfund State Contracts.
See 0472
Inorganic Contract Compliance Screening
System (ICCSS) Software (ILM02.1 Version
4) (for Microcomputers).
See 0038
Inorganic Contract Compliance Screening
System (ICCSS) Software (ILM02.1 Version
5) (for Microcomputers).
See 0039
Obligation of Funds under Superfund State
Contracts.
See 0478
Organic Contract Compliance Screening
System (OCCSS) Software (OLM01.8 Ver-
sion 6) (for Microcomputers).
See 0053
Procedure for Use of USAGE Preplaced
Contracts to Expedite Superfund Cleanup
Tasks.
See 1131
Required Contracts Management Training
for Regional Superfund Personnel.
See 0065
Technical Assistance Team (TAT) Contracts
Users' Manual.
See 0075
CONTRACTOR PERSONNEL
Roles and Responsibilities of Regional
Project Officers, Zone Project Officers, Work
Assignment Managers and Contracting Offi-
cers for the RCRA Enforcement, Permitting
and Assistance Contracts (REPA).
See 0070
CONTRACTS
Approval of Long Term Contracting Strategy
for Superfund (Superfund Management
Review: Recommendation E.2).
See 0018
Long-Term Contracting Strategy for Super-
fund.
See 0042
COOPERATIVE AGREEMENTS
Guidance on Site Assessment Cooperative
Agreements.
See 0475
Involvement of Superfund Program Manag-
ers in Superfund Response Agreement
Audits.
See 0099
COORDINATED PROCUREMENT
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
Frequency by Party Name Report.
See 0607
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
Frequency by Party Name Report.
See 0608
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
National Frequency by PRP Name Report.
See 0614
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): '
National PRP Listing Alphabetically by PRP
Name.
See 0615
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
National PRP Listing by Site.
See 0617
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Alabama.
See 0621
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Alabama.
See 0622
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for American Samoa.
See 0624
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for American Samoa.
See 0625
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS);
PRP Listing by Site for Arizona.
See 0627
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Arizona.
See 0628
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Arkansas.
See 0630
SU-11
-------
COORDINATED PROCUREMENT
SUBJECT INDEX
11 Stte Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Arkansas.
Soa0631
Site Enforcementtracking System (SETS):
! PRP Listing by Site for California.
Seo0633
: Stte Enfofcemont Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for California.
Sea 0634
SHe Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Colorado.
See 0636
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Colorado.
See 0637
SHa Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Connecticut.
See 0639
; Sjta Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
I- PRP Listing by sle for Connecticut.
See 0640
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by SKe for Delaware.
See 0642
I Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Delaware.
Sea 0643
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
! PRP Listing by Stta for Florida.
See 0645
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
: PRP Listing by Site for Florida.
See 0646
SHe Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Sfte for Georgia.
See 0648
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Georgia.
Sea 0649
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Idaho.
See 0651
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Idaho.
See 0652
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Illinois.
Sea 0654
" Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Illinois.
See 0655
i Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
ji PRP Listing by Site for Indiana.
See 0657
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Indiana.
See 0658
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Iowa.
See 0660
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Iowa.
See 0661
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Kansas.
See 0663
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP UsUng by Site for Kansas.
See 0664
: Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Kentucky.
See 0666
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Kentucky.
See 0667
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Louisiana,
See 0669
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Louisiana.
See 0670
gU-12
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Maine.
See 0672
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Maine.
See 0673
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Maryland.
See 0675
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Maryland.
See 0676
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Massachusetts.
See 0678
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Massachusetts.
See 0679
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Michigan.
See 0681
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Michigan.
See 0682
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Minnesota.
See 0684
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Minnesota.
See 0685
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Mississippi.
See 0687
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Mississippi.
See 0688
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Missouri.
See 0690
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Missouri.
See 0691
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Montana.
See 0693
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Montana.
See 0694
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Nebraska.
See 0696
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Nebraska.
See 0697
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Nevada.
See 0699
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Nevada.
See 0700
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for New Hampshire.
See 0702
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for New Hampshire.
See 0703
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for New Jersey.
See 0705
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for New Jersey.
See 0706
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for New Mexico.
See 0708
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for New Mexico.
See 0709
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for New York.
See 0711
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for New York.
See 0712
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for North Carolina.
See 0714
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for North Carolina.
See 0715
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for North Dakota.
See 0717
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for North Dakota.
See 0718
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Northern Marianas.
See 0720
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Northern Marianas.
See 0721
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Ohio.
See 0723
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Ohio.
See 0724
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Oklahoma.
See 0726
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Oklahoma.
See 0727
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Oregon.
See 0729
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Oregon.
See 0730
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Pennsylvania.
See 0732
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Pennsylvania.
See 0733
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Puerto Rico.
See 0735
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Puerto Rico.
See 0736
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Rhode Island.
See 0787
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Rhode Island.
See 0788
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for South Carolina.
See 0790
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for South Carolina.
See 0791
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for South Dakota.
See 0793
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for South Dakota.
See 0794
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Tennessee.
See 0796
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Tennessee.
See 0797
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Texas.
See 0799
| . .
-------
SUBJECT INDEX
DATA BASES
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)-
PRP Listing by Site for Texas.
See 0800
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Trust Territories.
See 0802
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Trust Territories
See 0803
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)-
PRP Listing by Site for Utah.
See 0805
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Utah.
See 0806
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)-
PRP Listing by Site for Vermont.
See 0808
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)-
PRP Listing by Site for Vermont.
See 0809
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Virginia.
See 0811
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)-
PRP Listing by Site for Washington. -
See 0813
-Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Washington. -
See 0814
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for West Virginia
See 0816
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)-
PRP Listing by Site for West Virginia.
See 0817
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Wisconsin.
See 0819
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)-
PRP Listing by Site for Wisconsin.
See 0820
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Wyoming.
See 0822
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)-
PRP Listing by Site for Wyoming.
See 0823
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP National Listing Alphabetically by Party
Name.
See 0826
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP National Listing Alphabetically by Party
Name.
See 0827
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP National Listing by Site.
See 0832
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)-
PRP National Listing by Site.
See 0833
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Site Listing by Site for Virginia.
See 0848
CORA (COST OF REMEDIAL ACTION)
Cost of Remedial Action Model.
See 1085
CORPS OF ENGINEERS
Procedure for Use of USAGE Preplaced
Contracts to Expedite Superfund Cleanup
Tasks.
See 1131
COST ANALYSIS
Technology Evaluation Report SITE Program
Demonstration Test, HAZCON Solidification,
Douglassville, Pennsylvania. Volume 1
See 1569
COST ESTIMATES
Cost of Remedial Actions (CORA) Model:
Overview and Applications.
See 1086
Control Technology: Estimating Innovative
Technology Costs for the SITE Program.
See 1222
Cost Estimating Systems for Remedial
Action Projects.
See 1123
Estimation of the Cost of Using Chemical
Protective Clothing.
See 1244
Scoper's Notes: An RI/FS Costing Guide.
Bringing in a Quality RI/FS on Time and
Within Budget.
See 1117
COSTS
CASHOUT Model: Calculates Current Value
of Superfund Cleanup Costs (Version 1.2)
(for Microcomputers).
See 1208
CASHOUT User's Manual for Superfund.
See 0515
COVERINGS
Engineering Bulletin: Landfill Covers.
See 1233
Ground-Water Issue: The Effects of Well
Casing Material on Ground Water-Quality.
See 1457
CREATED WETLANDS
Handbook for Constructed Wetlands Receiv-
ing Acid Mine Drainage.
See 1588
CREOSOTE
Alternative Biological Treatment Processes
for Remediation of Creosote-and PCP-Con-
taminated Materials: Bench-Scale Treatabil-
ity Studies.
See 1418
On-Site Engineering Report of the Slurry-
Phase Biological Reactor for Pilot-Scale
Testing on Contaminated Soil.
See 1520
Pilot-Scale Demonstration of a Slurry-Phase
Biological Reactor for Creosote-Contaminat-
ed Soil. Applications Analysis Report.
See 1426
Bench-Scale Evaluation of Alternative Bio-
logical Treatment Processes for the Remedi-
ation of Pentachlorophenol- and Creosote-
Contaminated Materials: Slurry-Phase Biore-
mediation.
See 1419
Bench-Scale Evaluation of Alternative Bio-
logical Treatment Processes for the Remedi-
ation of Pentachlorophenol- and Creosote-
Contaminated Materials: Solid-Phase Biore-
mediation.
See 1420
Biodegradation of Creosote and Pentachlor-
ophenol in Contaminated Groundwater:
Chemical and Biological Assessment.
See 1432
Detoxification of Pentachlorophenol and Cre-
osote Contaminated Groundwater by Physi-
cal Extraction: Chemical and Biological As-
sessment.
See 1438
Removal of Creosote from Soil by Thermal
Desorption.
See 1530
Technology Evaluation Report: Pilot-Scale
Demonstration of a Slurry-Phase Biological
Reactor for Creosote-Contaminated Soil.
Volume 1.
See 1542
CRIMINAL INVESTIGATIONS
Criminal Investigations and the Superfund
Program.
See 0469
CRUDE OIL
National Oil and Hazardous Substances Pol-
lution Contingency Plan (as Published in the
Federal Register, March 8, 1990).
See 0145
CYCLONE COMBUSTORS
Technology Evaluation Report: Babcock and
Wilcox Cyclone Furnace Vitrification Tech-
nology. Volume 1.
See 1337
Technology Evaluation Report: Babcock and
Wilcox Cyclone Furnace Vitrification Tech-
nology. Volume 2.
See 1338
DATA ACQUISITION
Cleanup Information Bulletin Board System
Users Guide. (CLU-IN: Cleanup Information
Bulletin Board).
See 1215
Guidance for Data Useability in Risk Assess-
ment.
See 1030
Guidance for Data Useability in Risk Assess-
ment. Interim Report.
See 1032
DATA AQUISITION
Accessing Federal Data Bases for Contami-
nated Site Clean-Up Technologies.
See 1188
DATA BASE MANAGEMENT
First 125 De Minimis Settlements: Statistics
from EPA's De Minimis Database.
See 0543
Superfund Soils Data Management System.
See 1536
DATA BASES
Accessing Federal Data Bases for Contami-
nated Site Clean-Up Technologies (Second
Edition).
See 1189
Emergency Response Notification System.
See 0927
Site Assessment Information Directory
(SAID) Region 1 (for Microcomputers). Date
of Coverage: October 1991.
See 0382
Site Assessment Information Directory
(SAID) Region 2 (for Microcomputers). Date
of Coverage: October 1991.
See 0383
Site Assessment Information Directory
(SAID) Region 3 (for Microcomputers). Date
of Coverage: October 1991.
See 0384
Site Assessment Information Directory
(SAID) Region 4 (for Microcomputers). Date
of Coverage: October 1991.
See 0385
Site Assessment Information Directory
(SAID) Region 5 (for Microcomputers). Date
of Coverage: 1991.
See 0386
Site Assessment Information Directory
(SAID) Region 6 (for Microcomputers). Date
of Coverage: October 1991.
See 0387
Site Assessment Information Directory
(SAID) Region 7 (for Microcomputers). Date
of Coverage: October 1991.
See 0388
SU-13
-------
DATA FILE
SUBJECT INDEX
Site Assessment Information Directory
(SAID) Region 8 (for Microcomputers). Date
of Coverage: 1991.
Sea 0389
Site Assessment Information Directory
(SAID) Region 9 (for Microcomputers). Date
of Coverage: October 1991.
See 0390
Site Assessment Information Directory
(SAID) Region 10 (for Microcomputers). Date
of Coverage: October 1991.
Soo 0391
DATA FILE
CERCLIS (Comprehensive Environmental
Response, Compensation, and Liability infor-
mation System) Site Location Extract.
Soo 0012
NotilicaUon of Hazardous Substance Sites
(Section 103(c».
See 1147
:' S(te Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)
(National),
Sea 0611
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)
(National) (for Microcomputers).
S900613
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)
(National - 3 1/2 Inch Diskette, IBM PS/2
Compatible) (for Microcomputers).
See 0620
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)
(Region 1-31/2 Inch Diskette IBM PS/2
Compatible) (for Microcomputers).
See 0849
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)
(Region 1) (for Microcomputers).
See 0850
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)
(Region 2 - 3 1/2 Inch Diskette IBM PS/2
Compatible) (for Microcomputers).
Sea 0851
, Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)
(Rogton 2) (for Microcomputers).
Sea 0852
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)
(Region 3-31/2 Inch Diskette IBM PS/2
Compatible) (for Microcomputers).
" ......
,
1 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)
(Region 3) (for Microcomputers).
Soe 0854
....... Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)
(Region 4-31/2 Inch Diskette IBM PS/2
Compatible) (for Microcomputers).
Sea 0855
Site Enforoemerjt Tracking System (SETS)
(Region 4) (for Microcomputers).
See 0856
1 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)
(Region 5-31/2 Inch Diskette IBM PS/2
Compatible) (for Microcomputers).
See 0857
"Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)
(Region 5) (for Microcomputers).
See 0858
- Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)
(Region 6-3 1/2 Inch Diskette IBM PS/2
: Compatible) (for Microcomputers).
Sea 0859
i Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)
(Region 6) (for Microcomputers).
See 0860
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)
....... (Region 7 - 3 1/2 Inch Diskette IBM PS/2
; Compatible) (for Microcomputers).
See 0861
' Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)
(Region 7) (for Microcomputers).
See 0862
SU-14
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)
(Region 8-3 1/2 Inch Diskette IBM PS/2
Compatible) (for Microcomputers).
See 0863
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)
(Region 8) (for Microcomputers).
See 0864
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)
(Region 9-31/2 Inch Diskette IBM PS/2
Compatible) (for Microcomputers).
See 0865
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)
(Region 9) (for Microcomputers).
See 0866
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)
(Region 10 - 3 1/2 Inch Diskette IBM PS/2
Compatible) (for Microcomputers).
See 0867
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)
(Region 10) (for Microcomputers).
See 0868
DATA QUALITY
Data Quality Objectives Process for Super-
fund.
See 0982
DATA QUALITY OBJECTIVES
Data Quality Objectives Decision Error Fea-
sibility Trials (DEFT) Beta Version 1.01.
User's Guide.
See 0979
Data Quality Objectives Process for Super-
fund.
See 0981
Data Quality Objectives Process for Super-
fund: Interim Final Guidance.
See 0983
Data Quality Objectives Process for Super-
fund: Workbook.
See 0984
DATA REQUIREMENTS
Engineering Bulletin: Technology Preselec-
tion Data Requirements.
See 1405
DDT
Health Effects Assessment for DDT.
See 1041
DE MINIMIS SETTLEMENTS
First 125 De Mlnlmis Settlements: Statistics
from EPA's De Minimis Database.
See 0543
DEBRIS
Obtaining a Soil and Debris Treatability Vari-
ance for Removal Actions. Superfund LDR
Guide No. 6B.
See 0430
DECENTRALIZATION (DISPERSAL)
Decentralization of Superfund Bottle Reposi-
tory Functions.
See 0985
DECISION MAKING
Framework for Real-Time Decision-Making:
New Bedford Harbor Pilot Dredging Study.
See 1587
DECONTAMINATION
Field Standard Operating Procedures for the
Decontamination of Response Personnel
F.S.O.P. No. 7.
See 0913
Innovative Technology: Soil Washing.
See 1515
DEHALOGENATION
Chemical Dehalogenation Treatability Stud-
ies under CERCLA: An Overview.
See 1153
Chemical Dehalogenation Treatment: APEG
Treatment.
See 1210
Citizen's Guide to Glycolate Dehalogenation.
See 0454
Innovative Technology: Glycolate Dehalo-
genation.
See 1513
Reductive Dehalogenation of Organic Con-
taminants in Soils and Ground Water.
Ground Water Issue.
See 1527
DELAWARE
National Priorities List Sites: Delaware.
See 0171
National Priorities List Sites: Delaware.
See 0172
National Priorities List Sites: Delaware, 1992.
See 0173
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Delaware.
See 0642
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Delaware.
See 0643
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Delaware.
See 0644
DEMONSTRATION PROGRAMS
Demonstration of Hazardous Waste Site
Treatment Technologies.
See 1227
Demonstration Projects Under the U.S. EPA
Superfund Innovative Technology Evaluation
Program.
See 1230
Superfund Innovative Technology Evaluation
Program: Annual Report to Congress 1992.
See 1309
DENSE NONAQUEOUS PHASE LIQUIDS
Estimating Potential for Occurrence of
DNAPL at Superfund Sites.
See 1442
DESORPTION
On-Site Engineering Report for the Low-
Temperature Thermal Desorption Pilot-Scale
Test on Contaminated Soil.
See 1519
Removal of Creosote from Soil by Thermal
Desorption.
See 1530
Thermal Desorption Treatment.
See 1357
DIOXIN
Evaluation of Personal Cooling Devices for
Dioxin Clean-Up Operation.
See 1248
DIRECTIVES
Accessing the $50 Million Set-Aside in the
Remedial Action Budget for Quick Response
at National Priorities List Sites.
See 1082
Authorization for Regional Administrators to
Approve Consistency Exemptions at NPL
Sites.
See 0998
Discussions with the Public Concerning NPL
Listings.
See 0339
NPL Construction Completion Definition at
Bioremediation and Soil Vapor Extraction
Sites.
See 0365
Superfund Accelerated Cleanup Model
(SACM) Coordination Strategy.
See 0120
DIRECTORIES
Hazmat Team Planning Guidance.
See 0915
I
i ?ill.'fl j,'!i, ..dlllKfi l!:l !',< wLllijLHiiilii/'iliL nil
iplllfanlliiini! iiUII itihl! ,,11: ji i,li,,' ,,i', ',;,
Hill ii'lil ,,,,11;, ,,"„! li'liaili |, j ij Ilia, .idlliiliMlljlidl I II.'Li! ,1' i,11!
..iiini'jliil 'i jiji Illl^PliilliailliilJ.!;!!!!,!, ijlillliul „
-------
SUBJECT INDEX
DIRECTORIES
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
Frequency by Party Name Report.
See 0608
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
Frequency by Party Name Report.
See 0609
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
Frequency by PRP Name Report, September
26,1991.
See 0610
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
National Alphabetical Report by PRP Name,
September 26,1991.
See 0612
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
National Frequency by PRP Name Report.
See 0614
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
National PRP Listing Alphabetically by PRP
Name.
See 0615
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
National PRP Listing by Site.
See 0617
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
National PRP Listing by Site.
See 0618
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
National PRP Report by Site, September 26,
1991.
See 0619
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)
(National - 3 1/2 Inch Diskette, IBM PS/2
Compatible) (for Microcomputers).
See 0620
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Alabama.
See 0621
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Alabama.
See 0622
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Alabama.
See 0623
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for American Samoa.
See 0624
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for American Samoa.
See 0625
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for American Samoa.
See 0626
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Arizona.
See 0627
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Arizona.
See 0628
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Arizona.
See 0629
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Arkansas.
See 0630
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Arkansas.
See 0631
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Arkansas.
See 0632
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for California.
See 0633
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for California.
See 0634
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for California.
See 0635
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Colorado.
See 0636
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Colorado.
See 0637
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Colorado.
See 0638
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Connecticut.
See 0639
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Connecticut.
See 0640
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Connecticut.
See 0641
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Delaware.
See 0642
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Delaware.
See 0643
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Delaware.
See 0644
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Florida.
See 0645
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Florida.
See 0646
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Florida.
See 0647
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Georgia.
See 0648
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Georgia.
See 0649
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Georgia.
See 0650
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Idaho.
See 0651
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Idaho.
See 0652
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Idaho.
See 0653
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Illinois.
See 0654
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Illinois.
See 0655
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Illinois.
See 0656
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Indiana.
See 0657
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Indiana.
See 0658
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Indiana.
See 0659
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Iowa.
See 0660
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Iowa.
See 0661
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Iowa.
See 0662
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Kansas.
See 0663
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Kansas.
See 0664
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Kansas.
See 0665
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Kentucky.
See 0666
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Kentucky.
See 0667
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Kentucky.
See 0668
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Louisiana.
See 0669
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Louisiana.
See 0670
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Louisiana.
See 0671
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Maine.
See 0672
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Maine.
See 0673
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Maine.
See 0674
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Maryland.
See 0675
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Maryland,
See 0676
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Maryland.
See 0677
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Massachusetts.
See 0678
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Massachusetts.
See 0679
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Massachusetts.
See 0680
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Michigan.
See 0681
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Michigan.
See 0682
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Michigan.
See 0683
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Minnesota.
See 0684
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Minnesota.
See 0685
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Minnesota.
See 0686
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Mississippi.
See 0687
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Mississippi.
See 0688
SU-15
-------
DIRECTORIES
SUBJECT INDEX
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Sits for Mississippi.
Sea 0689
' Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
t PRP Listing by Sits for Missouri.
See 0690
~ Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Missouri.
See 0691
, SHa Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
'. PRP Usting by Site for Missouri.
See 0692
!! Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Montana.
See 0693
; Sfta Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Montana.
Sea 0694
;, Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Montana.
Sea 0695
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Nebraska.
Sea 0696
Stte Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Nebraska.
See 0697
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Usting by Site for Nebraska.
Sea 069B
! Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
; PRP Listing by Site for Nevada.
Sea 0699
; Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
, PR? Listing by Site for Nevada.
Seo 0700
SHa Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Usting by Sits for Nevada.
See 0701
Sita Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Usting by Site for New Hampshire.
Soa 0702
Sfte Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Usting by Site for New Hampshire.
Se« 0703
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
" PRP Usting by Stte for New Hampshire.
Soa 0704
Stte Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Usting by Site for New Jersey.
Sea 0705
Sits Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Usting by Site for New Jersey.
Sea 0706
Stta Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Usting by SRe for New Jersey.
See 0707
Sita Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
; PRP Listing by Stte for New Mexico.
Sea 0708
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for New Mexico.
See 0709
1 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
1 PRP Listing by Site for New Mexico.
Sea 0710
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Sfte for New York.
Sea 0711
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for New York.
Sao 0712
Stte Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Usting by Site for New York.
Sea 0713
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Usting by Site for North Carolina.
Sea 0714
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
i PRP Usting by Site for North Carolina.
Sea 0715
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Usting by Site for North Carolina.
See 0716
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for North Dakota.
See 0717
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for North Dakota.
See 0718
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Usting by Site for North Dakota.
See 0719
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Usting by Site for Northern Marianas.
See 0720
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Northern Marianas.
See 0721
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Northern Marianas.
See 0722
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Usting by Site for Ohio.
See 0723
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Usting by Site for Ohio.
See 0724
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Ohio.
See 0725
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Oklahoma.
See 0726
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Usting by Site for Oklahoma.
See 0727
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Oklahoma.
See 0728
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Usting by Site for Oregon.
See 0729
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Usting by Site for Oregon.
See 0730
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Usting by Site for Oregon.
See 0731
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Usting by Site for Pennsylvania.
See 0732
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Pennsylvania.
See 0733
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Pennsylvania.
See 0734
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Puerto Rico.
See 0735
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Puerto Rico.
See 0736
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Puerto Rico.
See 0737
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Usting by Site for Region 1.
See 0738
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Usting by Site for Region 1, January
22, 1992.
See 0741
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Usting by Site for Region 1. Volume 1.
See 0742
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 2.
See 0743
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 2, January
22, 1992.
See 0746
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 2. Volume 2.
See 0747
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Usting by Site for Region 3.
See 0748
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Usting by Site for Region 3, January
22, 1992.
See 0750
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Usting by Site for Region 3. Volume 3.
See 0751
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Usting by Site for Region 4.
See 0752
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Usting by Site for Region 4, January
22,1992.
See 0755
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Usting by Site for Region 4. Volume 4.
See 0756
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 5.
See 0757
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 5, January
22, 1992.
See 0760
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Usting by Site for Region 5. Volume 5.
See 0761
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Usting by Site for Region 6.
See 0762
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Usting by Site for Region 6, January
22, 1992.
See 0765
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Usting by Site for Region 6. Volume 6.
See 0766
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Usting by Site for Region 7.
See 0767
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Usting by Site for Region 7, January
22,1992.
See 0770
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 7. Volume 7.
See 0771
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Usting by Site for Region 8.
See 0772
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Usting by Site for Region, 8, January
22, 1992.
See 0775
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Usting by Site for Region 8. Volume 8.
See 0776
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Usting by Site for Region 9.
See 0777
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 9.
See 0778
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 9, January
22, 1992.
See 0780
SU-16
-------
SUBJECT INDEX
DIRECTORIES
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 9. Volume 9.
See 0781
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 10.
See 0782
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 10, January
22, 1992.
See 0785
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 10. Volume
10.
See 0786
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Rhode Island.
See 0787
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Rhode Island.
See 0788
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Rhode Island.
See 0789
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for South Carolina.
See 0790
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for South Carolina.
See 0791
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for South Carolina.
See 0792
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for South Dakota.
See 0793
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for South Dakota.
See 0794
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for South Dakota.
See 0795
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)-
PRP Listing by Site for Tennessee.
See 0796
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Tennessee.
See 0797
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Tennessee.
See 0798
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Texas.
See 0799
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Texas.
See 0800
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Texas.
See 0801
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Trust Territories.
See 0802
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Trust Territories.
See 0803
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Trust Territories.
See 0804
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Utah.
See 0805
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)-
PRP Listing by Site for Utah.
See 0806
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)-
PRP Listing by Site for Utah.
See 0807
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Vermont.
See 0808
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Vermont.
See 0809
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Vermont.
See 0810
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Virginia.
See 0811
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Virginia.
See 0812
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Washington.
See 0813
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Washington.
See 0814
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Washington.
See 0815
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for West Virginia.
See 0816
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for West Virginia.
See 0817
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for West Virginia.
See 0818
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Wisconsin.
See 0819
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Wisconsin.
See 0820
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Wisconsin.
See 0821
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Wyoming.
See 0822
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
, PRP Listing by Site for Wyoming.
See 0823
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Wyoming:
See 0824
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP National Frequency by Party Name,
January 22, 1992.
See 0825
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP National Listing Alphabetically by Party
Name.
See 0826
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP National Listing Alphabetically by Party
Name.
See 0827
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP National Listing Alphabetically by Party
Name.
See 0828
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP National Listing Alphabetically by Party
Name.
See 0829
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP National Listing Alphabetically by Party
Name, January 22, 1992.
See 0831
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP National Listing by Site.
See 0832
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP National Listing by Site.
See 0833
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP National Listing by Site.
See 0834
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP National Listing by Site.
See 0835
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP National Listing by Site, January 22,
1992.
See 0837
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Report by Site for Region 1, September
26, 1991.
See 0838
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Report by Site for Region 2, September
26, 1991.
See 0839
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Report by Site for Region 3, September
26, 1991.
See 0840
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Report by Site for Region 4, September
26, 1991.
See 0841
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Report by Site for Region 5, September
26, 1991.
See 0842
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Report by Site for Region 6, September
26, 1991.
See 0843
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Report by Site for Region 7, September
26, 1991.
See 0844
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Report by Site for Region 9, September
26, 1991.
See 0846
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Report by Site for Region 10, Septem-
ber 26, 1991.
See 0847
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Site Listing by Site for Virginia. '
See 0848
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)
(Region 1-31/2 Inch Diskette IBM PS/2
Compatible) (for Microcomputers).
See 0849
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)
(Region 2-31/2 Inch Diskette IBM PS/2
Compatible) (for Microcomputers).
See 0851
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)
(Region 3-31/2 Inch Diskette IBM PS/2
Compatible) (for Microcomputers).
See 0853
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)
(Region 4-31/2 Inch Diskette IBM PS/2
Compatible) (for Microcomputers).
See 0855
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)
(Region 5-31/2 Inch Diskette IBM PS/2
Compatible) (for Microcomputers).
See 0857
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)
(Region 6-31/2 Inch Diskette IBM PS/2
Compatible) (for Microcomputers).
See 0859
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)
(Region 7-3 1/2 Inch Diskette IBM PS/2
Compatible) (for Microcomputers).
See 0861
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)
(Region 8-31/2 Inch Diskette IBM PS/2
Compatible) (for Microcomputers).
See 0863
SU-17
-------
DNA DAMAGE
SUBJECT INDEX
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)
(Region 9-31/2 Inch Diskette IBM PS/2
Compatible) (for Microcomputers).
See 0865
: Sit* Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)
(Region 10 - 3 1/2 Inch Diskette IBM PS/2
Compatible) (for Microcomputers).
See 0887
DNA DAMAGE
I Evaluation of Exposure Markers.
See 1246
Using the DNA Alkaline Unwinding Assay to
Detect DNA Damage In Laboratory and Envi-
ronmentally Exposed Cells and Tissues.
Sea 1368
DNA UNWINDING PROTEINS
Using, tha DNA Alkaline Unwinding Assay to
Detect DNA Damage in Laboratory and Envi-
ronmenlatly Exposed Cells and Tissues.
:: Saa 136«
DOCUMENTATION
CERCLIS Data Handling Support Policy
Statement
So«Q013
Continuous Release-Emergency Response
Notification System and Priority Assessment
Model; Model Documentation.
: See 1143
DOCUMENTS
Design Considerations for Ambient Air Mom-
s''- torirtg at Superfund Sites. Engineering Bulle-
• "tin;
See 1402
Engineering Bulletins: Aids to the Develop-
"„ rnefii of Remedial Alternatives.
|^3ew 1236
DREDGE SPOIL
SITE Demonstration of the CF Systems Or-
• ganfcs Extraction System.
S« 1301
DREDGING
Framework for Real-Time Decision-Making:
New Bedford Harbor Pilot Dredging Study.
See 1587
Application of 'Real-Time' Monitoring in De-
'": tislon Making: The New Bedford Harbor
Pitot Dredging Project.
See 1574
Development and Use of Site-Specific
Chemical and Biological Criteria for Assess-
' ing New Bedford Harbor Pilot Dredging
: Project
See, 1583
DRiNKING WATER
ARARs Q's and A's Compliance with New
i ! SDWA National Primary Drinking Water Reg-
ulations for Organic and Inorganic Chemi-
' cals.
See 0400
Compendium of Federal Rnancial Assist-
ance Programs: Targeting Programs for
State and Local Ground-Water Protection.
See 1435
Remediation Completed: But Is the Ground-
water Meeting tha Safe Drinking Water Act
Requirements. Haztech International 90.
Held in Houston, Texas on May 8-10, 1990.
:-,! See 1473
DRUG FREE WORK PLACE ACT
ij,, Dobarmont and Suspension.
. n
rifiUG INDUSTRY
":'Guidelines for the Cleanup of Clandestine
Drug Laboratories.
See 1007
SU-18
DRUGS
Guidelines for the Cleanup of Clandestine
Drug Laboratories.
See 1007
DRUMS (CONTAINERS)
Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Clean-
up Efforts Nationwide, Fall 1992. (Valley of
the Drums, Bullitt County, Kentucky).
See 0947
DUPONT/OBERLIN MICROFILTRATION
TREATMENT
Technology Demonstration Summary,
DuPont/Oberlin Miorofiltration System, Pai-
merton, Pennsylvania. April-May 1992.
See 1336
Technology Evaluation Report: SITE Pro-
gram Demonstration of the DuPont/Oberlin
Microfiltration Technology.
See 1350
DUPONT/OBERLIN MICROFILTRATION
TREATMENT SYSTEM
DuPont/Oberlin Microfiltration Technology.
Applications Analysis Report.
See 1584
Demonstration of Microfiltration Technology.
See 1228
EARTH FILLS
Conducting Remedial Investigations/Feasi-
bility Studies for CERCLA Municipal Landfill
Sites.
See 1084
Guidance Documents Relating to Landfills
and Contaminants.
See 1259
international Waste Technologies/Geo-Con
In situ Stabilization/Solidification: Applica-
tions Analysis Report.
See 1557
Streamlining the RI/FS for CERCLA Munici-
pal Landfill Sites.
See 1118
Streamlining the RI/FS for CERCLA Munici-
pal Landfill Sites.
See 1119
Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Clean-
up Efforts Nationwide, Spring 1993 (Powers-
ville Site Profile, Peach County, Georgia).
See 0958
Technology Evaluation Report: International
Waste Technologies/Geo-Con In situ Stabili-
zation/Solidification. Volume 3. Update
Report.
See 1567
Technology Evaluation Report: International
Waste Technologies/Geo-Con In situ Stabili-
zation/Solidification. Volume 4. Update
Report.
See 1568
ECOLOGY
ECO Update: Ecological Assessment of Su-
perfund Sites. An Overview. Volume 1,
Number 2, December 1991.
See 1019
ECO Update: The Role of BTAGs in Ecologi-
cal Assessment. Volume 1, Number 1, Sep-
tember 1991.
See 1020
ECO Update. Volume 1, Number 4. Develop-
ing a Work Scope for Ecological Assess-
ments.
See 1022
ECO Update. Volume 1, Number 5, August
1992. Briefing the STAG: Initial Description
of Setting, History, and Ecology of a Site.
See 1023
Ecological Risk Assessment Methods: A
Review and Evaluation of Past Practices in
the Superfund and RCRA (Resource Conser-
vation and Recovery Act) Programs (Execu-
tive Summary Included).
See 1024
Ecological Risk Management in the Super-
fund and RCRA (Resource Conservation and
Recovery Act) Programs.
See 1025
Nature and Extent of Ecological Risks at Su-
perfund Sites and RCRA (Resource Conser-
vation and Recovery Act) Facilities (Execu-
tive Summary Included).
See 1080
Risk Assessment Guidance for Superfund.
Volume 2. Environmental Evaluation Manual.
See 1072
Summary of Ecological Risks, Assessment
• Methods, and Risk Management Decisions
in Superfund and RCRA (Resource Conser-
vation and Recovery Act).
See 1077
ECONOMIC ANALYSIS
Estimation of the Cost of Using Chemical
Protective Clothing.
See 1244
ECONOMIC ASSISTANCE
Compendium of Federal Financial Assist-
ance Programs: Targeting Programs for
State and Local Ground-Water Protection.
See 1435
ECOSYSTEMS
Ecosystem Effects of Superfund. National
Priority List Sites in Industrial Landscapes: A
Framework for Policy Decisions.
See 0135
ELDERLY PERSONS
Community Relations: Use of Senior Envi-
ronmental Employees in Superfund (Super-
fund Management Review: Recommendation
43.K.L).
See 0088
ELECTRIC BATTERIES
Control Technologies for Remediation of
Contaminated Soil and Waste Deposits at
Superfund Lead Battery Recycling Sites.
See 1221
ELECTROACOUSTIC WAVES
Development of Electro-Acoustic Soil De-
contamination (ESD) Process for In situ Ap-
plications.
See 1498
ELECTROCOAGULATION
Alternating Current Electrocoagulation for
Superfund Site Remediation.
See 1192
ELECTRODYNAMICS
Use of Electrokinetics for Hazardous Waste
Site Remediation.
See 1366
ELECTROKINETICS
Removal of Radionuclides by Electrokinetic
Soil Processing.
See 1531
ELECTROLYTIC RESPIROMETRY
Respirometric Methods for Determination of
Biodegradability and Biodegradation Kinetics
for Hazardous Organic Pollutant Com-
pounds.
See 1427
-------
SUBJECT INDEX
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
EMERGENCIES
Communicating with the Public About Haz-
ardous Materials: An Examination of Local
Practice. Risk Communication Series.
See 0464
Emergency Response Cleanup Services
Contracts (ERGS). Users Manual.
See 0024
National Oil and Hazardous Substances Pol-
lution Contingency Plan (The NCP).
See 0146
EMERGENCY PLANNING
Superfund Emergency Response Actions: A
Summary of Federally-Funded Removals.
Fifth Annual Report - Fiscal Year 1990.
See 0313
Superfund Emergency Response Actions: A
Summary of Federally Funded Removals.
Fourth Annual Report - Fiscal Year 1989
See 0314
Superfund Emergency Response Actions: A
Summary of Federally-Funded Removals.
Sixth Annual Report, Fiscal Year 1991.
See 0315
EMERGENCY PLANS
Superfund Emergency Response Actions: A
Summary of Federally Funded Removals.
Volume 3.
See 0318
EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS
Health and Safety Audit Guidelines: SARA
Title I, Section 126.
See 0916
EMERGENCY RESPONSE NOTIFICATION
SYSTEM
CERCLA Notifications: Emergency Re-
sponse Notification System (ERNS) Fact
Sheet.
See 0926
Continuous Release-Emergency Response
Notification System and Priority Assessment
Model: Model Documentation.
See 1143
Continuous Release-Emergency Response
Notification System and Priority Assessment
Model: User's Manual for EPA Regions.
See 1144
Emergency Response Notification System.
See 0927
Oil Notifications: Emergency Response Noti-
fication System (ERNS) Fact Sheet.
See 0930
Overview of ERNS: Emergency Response
Notification System (ERNS) Fact Sheet.
See 0935
EMERGENCY RESPONSE PROGRAM
Superfund Emergency Response Actions: A
Summary of Federally-Funded Removals.
Fifth Annual Report - Fiscal Year 1990.
See 0313
EMERGENCY SERVICES
Emergency Responders Agreements for
Fund-Lead Remedial Actions.
See 1001
EMISSION FACTORS
Air/Superfund National Technical Guidance
Study Series. Database of Emission Rate
Measurement Projects.
See 1379
Air/Superfund National Technical Guidance
Study Series. Emission Factors for Super-
fund Remediation Technologies.
See 1381
Evaluation of Emission Factors for Formal-
dehyde from Certain Wood Processing Oper-
ations. Final Report, May-August 1989.
See 1410
EMISSION RATES
Air/Superfund National Technical Guidance
Study Series. Development of Example Pro-
cedures for Evaluating the Air Impacts of
Soil Excavation Associated with Superfund
Remedial Actions.
See 1380
EMISSIONS
Air/Superfund National Technical Guidance
Study Series. Models for Estimating Air
Emission Rates from Superfund Remedial
Actions.
See 1388
ENCAPSULATING
Technology Evaluation Report SITE Program
Demonstration Test, HAZCON Solidification,
Douglassville, Pennsylvania Volume 1.
See 1569
ENCAPSULATION
Description of EPA SITE Demonstration of
the HAZCON Stabilization Process at the
Douglassville, Pennsylvania Superfund Site.
See 1552
SITE Demonstration of the CHEMFIX Solidi-
fication/Stabilization Process at the Portable
Equipment Salvage Company Site.
See 1559
ENDANGERMENT ASSESSMENT
Endangerment Assessment Guidance.
See 0527
ENVIRONMENT MANAGEMENT
Recent Advances in Risk Reduction Engi-
neering.
See 1064
ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING
AutoMOUSE: An Improvement to the
MOUSE Computerized Uncertainty Analysis
System Operational Manual.
See 1201
ENVIRONMENTAL EXPOSURE
Communicating with the Public About Haz-
ardous Materials: An Examination of Local
Practice. Risk Communication Series.
See 0464
Superfund Fact Sheet: Benzene.
See 0489
Superfund Fact Sheet: PCBs.
See 0492
Superfund Fact Sheet: Trichloroethylene.
See 0496
ENVIRONMENTAL EXPOSURE PATHWAY
Air/Superfund National Technical Guidance
Study Series. Volume 1. Overview of Air
Pathway Assessments for Superfund Sites
(Revised).
See 1391
Superfund Fact Sheet: Exposure Pathways.
See 0393
ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH
Health Effects Assessment for Benzene.
See 1035
Health Effects Assessment for Cadmium.
See 1036
Health Effects Assessment for Carbon Tet-
rachloride.
See 1037
Health Effects Assessment for Chlordane.
See 1038
Health Effects Assessment for Chloroben-
zene.
See 1039
Health Effects Assessment for Chloroform.
See 1040
Health Effects Assessment for DDT.
See 1041
Health Effects Assessment for Methyl Ethyl
Ketone.
See 1042
Health Effects Assessment for Methylene
Chloride.
See 1043
Health Effects Assessment for Naphthalene.
See 1044
Health Effects Assessment for Phenol.
See 1045
Health Effects Assessment for Styrene.
See 1046
Health Effects Assessment for Tetrachlor-
oethylene.
See 1047
Health Effects Assessment for Trichloroethy-
lene.
See 1048
Health Effects Assessment for Xyienes.
See 1049
Health Effects Assessment for 2,4,5-Trichlor-
ophenoxy Acetic Acid (2,4,5-T).
See 1050
Supplemental Guidance to RAGS: Calculat-
ing the Concentration Term. Volume 1,
Number 1, May 1992.
See 1079
Updated Health Effects Assessment for Ace-
tone.
See 1080
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENTS
Assessing Potential Indoor Air Impacts for
Superfund Sites. Air/Superfund National
Technical Guidance Study Series.
See 1395
AutoMOUSE: An Improvement to the
MOUSE Computerized Uncertainty Analysis
System Operational Manual.
See 1201
Health Effects Assessment Summary
Tables.
See 1051
Health Effects Assessment Summary
Tables.
See 1052
Health Effects Assessment Summary
Tables.
See 1053
Health Effects Assessment Summary Tables
Fourth Quarter FY 1989.
See 1054
Preliminary Ranking Evaluation Score
(PREscore) Version 1.1 (for Microcomput-
ers).
See 0372
On-Site Methods for Assessing Chemical
Impact on the Soil Environment Using Earth-
worms: A Case Study at the Baird and
McGuire Superfund Site, Holbrook, Massa-
chusetts.
See 1521
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
Air/Superfund National Technical Guidance
Study Series: Estimation of Air Impacts for
Soil Vapor Extraction (SVE) Systems.
See 1383
CERCLA (Comprehensive Environmental Re-
sponse, Compensation and Liability Act)
Compliance with Other Laws Manual: Part 2.
Clean Air Act and Other Environmental Stat-
utes and State Requirements.
See 0413
Evaluating Amphibian Responses in Wet-
lands Impacted by Mining Activities in the
Western United States.
See 1586
SU-19
-------
ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES
ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES
^armpdzafton of QA Procedures for Envi-
fen'mpntal Data Operations: Development of
a National Consensus Standard for Quality
Assurance for Environmental Programs.
Sea 0989
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
Future of Expert Systems In the Environmen-
tal Protection Agency.
Sae 1257
ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING
SnvironmantaJ Monitoring 'Methods Index
(EMMI). Version 1.0 (5 - User LAN) (for
Microcomputers).
SM123B
Environmental Monitoring Methods Index
(EMMI), Version 1.0 (for Microcomputers).
Sea 1239
Environmental Monitoring Methods Index
(EMM!), Version W (Unlimited User LAN)
((or Microcomputers).
Sea 1240
International Symposium on Reid Screening
Methods for Hazardous Wastes and Toxic
Chemicals (2nd), Proceedings. Held in Las
Vegas, Nevada on February 12-14,1991.
Sea 1279
Asymmetric Loss Function for Superfund Re-
m
-------
SUBJECT INDEX
FACILITIES
EPA REGION 2
Notification of Hazardous Waste Sites Re-
quired Under Section 103(c) of the Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compen-
sation and Liability Act (CERCLA) of 1980-
EPA Region 2.
See 1175
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)-
PRP Listing by Site for Region 2.
See 0743
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Report by Site for Region 2, September
26, 1991.
See 0839
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)
(Region 2-3 1/2 Inch Diskette IBM PS/2
Compatible) (for Microcomputers).
See 0851
EPA REGION 3
Notification of Hazardous Waste Sites Re-
quired Under Section 103(c) of the Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compen-
sation and Liability Act (CERCLA) of 1980:
EPA Region 3.
See 1176
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 3.
See 0748
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Report by Site for Region 3, September
26, 1991.
See 0840
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)
• (Region 3-31/2 Inch Diskette IBM PS/2
Compatible) (for Microcomputers).
See 0853
EPA REGION 4
Environmental Compliance Branch, Standard
Operating Procedures and Quality Assurance
Manual, Revision 1.
See 0535
Notification of Hazardous Waste Sites Re-
quired Under Section 103(c) of the Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compen-
sation and Liability Act (CERCLA) of 1980:
EPA Region 4.
See 1177
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 4.
See 0752
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Report by Site for Region 4, September
26, 1991.
See 0841
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)
(Region 4-31/2 Inch Diskette IBM PS/2
Compatible) (for Microcomputers).
See 0855
EPA REGION 5
Notification of Hazardous Waste Sites Re-
quired Under Section 103(c) of the Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compen-
sation and Liability Act (CERCLA) of 1980:
EPA Region 5.
See 1178
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)-
PRP Listing by Site for Region 5.
See 0757
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Report by Site for Region 5, September
26, 1991.
See 0842
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)
(Region 5 - 3 1/2 Inch Diskette IBM PS/2
Compatible) (for Microcomputers).
See 0857
EPA REGION 6
Notification of Hazardous Waste Sites Re-
quired Under Section 103(c) of the Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compen-
sation and Liability Act (CERCLA) of 1980:
EPA Region 6.
See 1179
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 6.
See 0762
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Report by Site for Region 6, September
26, 1991.
See 0843
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)
(Region 6-3 1/2 Inch Diskette IBM PS/2
Compatible) (for Microcomputers).
See 0859
EPA REGION 7
Notification of Hazardous Waste Sites Re-
quired Under Section 103(c) of the Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compen-
sation and Liability Act (CERCLA) of 1980:
EPA Region 7.
See 1180
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 7.
See 0767
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Report by Site for Region 7, September
26, 1991.
See 0844
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)
(Region 7-31/2 Inch Diskette IBM PS/2
Compatible) (for Microcomputers).
See 0861
EPA REGION 8
Notification of Hazardous Waste Sites Re-
quired Under Section 103(c) of the Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compen-
sation and Liability Act (CERCLA) of 1980:
EPA Region 8.
See 1181
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 8.
See 0772
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)
(Region 8-31/2 Inch Diskette IBM PS/2
Compatible) (for Microcomputers).
See 0863
EPA REGION 9
Notification of Hazardous Waste Sites Re-
quired Under Section 103(c) of the Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compen-
sation and Liability Act (CERCLA) of 1980:
EPA Region 9.
See 1182
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 9.
See 0777
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Report by Site for Region 9, September
26, 1991.
See 0846
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)
(Region 9-3 1/2 Inch Diskette IBM PS/2
Compatible) (for Microcomputers).
See 0865
EQUIPMENT
Reid Standard Operating Procedures for the
Decontamination of Response Personnel
F.S.O.P. No. 7.
See 0913
EQUIPMENT SPECIFICATIONS
Specifications and Guidance for Contami-
nant-Free Sample Containers.
See 0994
ERNS SYSTEM
Emergency Response Notification System.
See 0927
ETHYLENE/TRICHLORO
Superfund Fact Sheet: Trichloroethylene.
See 0496
EXCAVATION
Air/Superfund National Technical Guidance
Study Series. Development of Example Pro-
cedures for Evaluating the Air Impacts of
Soil Excavation Associated with Superfund
Remedial Actions.
See 1380
EXPEDITED RESPONSE ACTION
Expedited Response Actions.
See 1003
EXPERT SYSTEMS
Future of Expert Systems in the Environmen-
tal Protection Agency.
See 1257
PAST: The Potential ARARs Selection Tool.
See 0434
EXPOSURE
Risk Assessment Guidance for Superfund.
Volume 1. Human Health Evaluation Manual.
Supplemental Guidance: 'Standard Default
Exposure Factors'.
See 1071
SARA (Superfund Amendments and Reau-
thorization Act) Section 313 Roadmaps Data
Base. User's Manual. Version 2.10.
See 0304
EXTRACTION
Applications Analysis Report: SITE Program,
CF Systems Organics Extraction System,
New Bedford, Massachusetts.
See 1196
Citizen's Guide to Solvent Extraction.
See 0459
Evaluation of Ground-Water Extraction Rem-
edies: Phase 2. Volume 1. Summary Report.
See 1444
Evaluation of Ground-Water Extraction Rem-
edies: Phase 2. Volume 2. Case Studies and
Updates.
See 1445
Evaluation of Ground-Water Extraction Rem-
edies. Volume 2. Case Studies 1-19.
See 1446
Evaluation of Ground-Water Extraction Rem-
edies. Volume 3. General Site Data: Data
Base Reports.
See 1447
In situ Soil Vapor Extraction Treatment
See 1511
In situ Steam Extraction Treatment.
See 1512
Literature Review Summary of Metals Ex-
traction Processes Used to Remove Lead
from Soils.
See 1518
Evaluating the Effectiveness of Ground
Water Extraction Systems.
See 1443
Terra Vac In situ Vacuum Extraction System:
Applications Analysis Report
See 1355
EXXON VALDEZ
Exxon Valdez Oil Spill. A Report to the
President.
See 0928
FACILITIES
CERCLA Off-Site Policy - Eligibility of Facili-
ties in Assessment Monitoring.
See 0414
SU-21
-------
FAP1UTIES MANAGEMENT
SUBJECT INDEX
Compendium of Federal Facilities Directives,
1984 and 1985.
|Se« 0696 ,,;
FACILITIES MANAGEMENT
Facility Response Plans.
See 0929
FACILITY RESPONSE PLAN
Facility Response Plans.
See 0929
FCfS (FIELD CERTIFICATION TRACKING
SYSTEM)
FJaid Certification Tracking System (FCTS).
User's Guide, Version 2.1.
Sea 0909
FEASIBILITY
I Guidance (or Evaluating the Technical Im-
, practicability of Ground-Water Restoration.
Se«1460
FEDERAL AGENCIES
Harmonization of QA Procedures for Envi-
ronmental Data Operations: Development of
a National Consensus Standard for Quality
Assurance for Environmental Programs.
Sea 0989
FEDERAL BUDGETS
Accessing the $50 Million Set-Aside in the
Remedial Action Budget for Quick Response
at National Priorities List Sites.
Sa«1082
FEDERAL FACILITIES
Guidance for Federal Facilities on Release
Nojftoatkm Requirements under CERCLA
and SARA TiUelii;
Sea 0898
FEDERAL GOVERNMENT
• Compendium of Federal Facilities Directives,
:: 1964 and 198&
"" So° °896
FEDERAL'LAW ' "
Dobarmont and Suspension.
See 0470
FILTRATION
Membrane Treatment of Wood Preserving
Sfte Groundwater by SBP Technologies, Inc.
Applications Analysis Report
See 1468 , „
Engineered Btofilter for Removing Organic
Contaminants in Air.
Sea 1403
RHratton of Ground Water Samples for
Metals Analysis.
See 1454
StTE Program Demonstration of the SBP
Technologies, Inc., Membrane Filtration
System on Creosote-Contaminated Water.
See 1592
Site Emerging Technologies: Bioscrubber for
; Removing Hazardous Organic Emissions
1 from Soft, Water and Air Decontamination
Processes.
Ii::S«1302
FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE
Suporfund Technical Assistance Grant
(TAG) Handbook: Applying for Your Grant.
See 0500
' Supertax! Technical Assistance Grant
! (TAG) Handbook: The Application Forms
wMh Instructions.
Sw0501
FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT
i,:•' Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
! l!l National PRP Osting Alphabetically by PRP
Name.
SCO 0616
Sfte Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 1.
Se«b739
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 2.
See 0744
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 4.
See 0753
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 5.
See 0758
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 6.
See 0763
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 7.
See 0768
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 8.
See 0773
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 10.
See 0783
FINANCING
Evaluating Mixed Funding Settlements under
CERCLA.
See 0537
Interim Policy on Mixed Funding Settlements
Involving the Preauthorization of States or
Political Subdivisions.
See 0566
FIRE DEPARTMENTS
Hazmat Team Planning Guidance.
See 0915
FLORIDA
National Priorities List Sites: Florida.
See 0174
National Priorities List Sites: Florida.
See 0175
National Priorities List Sites: Florida, 1992.
See 0176
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Florida.
See 0645
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Florida.
See 0646
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Florida.
See 0647
FOAM
Foam Scrubbing (Chapter 9).
See 1411
FOAM SCRUBBING
Foam Scrubbing (Chapter 9).
See 1411
FOREIGN TECHNOLOGY
Assessment of International Technologies
for Superfund Applications: Technology
Review and Trip Report Results.
See 1197
International Evaluation of In-situ Biorestora-
tion of Contaminated Soil and Groundwater
(September 1990)~Translation.
See 1517
Toronto Harbour Commissioners (THC) Soil
Recycle Treatment Train. Applications Analy-
sis Report.
See 1544
FORMALDEHYDE
Evaluation of Emission Factors for Formal-
dehyde from Certain Wood Processing Oper-
ations. Final Report, May-August 1989.
See 1410
FOURIER TRANSFORM SPECTROMETERS
Use of a Fourier Transform Spectrometer as
a Remote Sensor at Superfund Sites.
See 1365
FRAUD
Criminal Investigations and the Superfund
Program.
See 0469
FUGITIVE EMISSIONS
Foam Scrubbing (Chapter 9).
See 1411
FULLERTOM (CALIFORNIA)
Demonstration of a Trial Excavation at the
McColl Superfund Site.
See 1226
Technology Evaluation Report: Site Program
Demonstration of a Trial Excavation at the
McColl Superfund Site.
See 1349
FULTON (NEW YORK)
Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Clean-
up Efforts Nationwide, Spring 1993 (Fulton
Terminals Site Profile, Oswego County, NY).
See 0955
FUND-BALANCING WAIVERS
ARARs Q's and A's: The Fund-Balancing
Waiver.
See 0403
FUNDS
Debarment and Suspension.
See 0470
Political Subdivision Involvement in Super-
fund.
See 0480
GAS ANALYSIS
Compendium of ERT Field Analytical Proce-
dures.
See 0902
GAS CHROMATOGRAPHY
Evaluation of Portable Gas Chromatographs.
See 1479
GAS INJECTION
Accutech Pneumatic Fracturing Extraction
and Hot Gas Injection, Phase 1. Applications
Analysis Report.
See 1190
GENERATOR SETTLEMENTS
Waiver of Concurrence on De Minlmis Gen-
erator Settlements.
See 0892
GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEMS
Summary of GIS Support to Superfund.
See 1307
GEORGIA
National Priorities List Sites: Georgia.
See 0177
National Priorities List Sites: Georgia.
See 0178
National Priorities List Sites: Georgia, 1992.
See 0179
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Georgia.
See 0648
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Georgia.
See 0649
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Georgia.
See 0650
Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Clean-
up Efforts Nationwide, Spring 1993 (Powers-
ville Site Profile, Peach County, Georgia).
See 0958
GLYCOLIC ACID
Innovative Technology: Glycolate Dehalo-
genation.
See 1513
SU-22
-------
SUBJECT INDEX
GROUND WATER
GLYCOLS
Citizen's Guide to Glycolate Dehalogenation
See 0454
GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES
Compendium of Good Ideas: Models of Suc-
cess and Lessons Learned. Volume 2
Source Book.
See 0134
GOVERNMENT POLICIES
Considerations in Ground-Water Remedi-
ation at Superfund Sites and RCRA Facili-
ties: Update.
See 1437
Discussions with the Public Concerning NPL
Listings.
See 0339
Evaluating Mixed Funding Settlements under
CERCLA.
See 0537
Interim Policy on Mixed Funding Settlements
Involving the Preauthorization of States or
Political Subdivisions.
See 0566
NPL Construction Completion Definition at
Bioremediation and Soil Vapor Extraction
Sites.
See 0365
Policy Towards Owners of Residential Prop-
erty at Superfund Sites.
See 0587
Presumptive Remedies: Policy and Proce-
dures.
See 1103
RCRA, Superfund Monthly Hot Line Reports
See 0303
Revision of Policy Regarding Superfund
Project Assignment between Alternative Re-
medial Contracting Strategy Contractors and
the US. Army Corps of Engineers.
See 0068
Superfund Policy Forum Update, Volume 1
Number 1, February 1992.
See 0324
GRANTS
Superfund Technical Assistance Grants Pro-
gram: Regional Guidance Manual.
See 0504
GRANULAR ACTIVATED CARBON
TREATMENT
Granular Activated Carbon Treatment. Engi-
neering Bulletin.
See 1258
GREAT LAKES
Dealing with Toxic Polluted Sediments in the
Great Lakes Basin.
See 1582
GROUND WATER
Air/Superfund National Technical Guidance
Study Series. Comparisons of Air Stripper
Simulations and Field Performance Data
See 1376
ARARs Q's and A's: State Ground-Water
Antidegradation Issues.
See 0402
Basic Concepts of Contaminant Sorption at
Hazardous Waste Sites (Ground Water
Issue).
See 1431
CERCLA Site Discharges to POTWs- Guid-
ance Manual.
See 1576
Chemical Enhancements to Pump-and-Treat
Remediation. Ground Water Issue
See 1434
Compendium of ERT Groundwater Samplina
Procedures.
See 0903
Compendium of Federal Financial Assist-
ance Programs: Targeting Programs for
State and Local Ground-Water Protection
See 1435
Considerations in Ground-Water Remedi-
ation at Superfund Sites and RCRA Facili-
ties: Update.
See 1437
Determining Soil Response Action Levels
Based on Potential Contaminant Migration to
Ground Water: A Compendium of Examples
See 1497
Emerging Technologies: Bio-Recovery Sys-
tems Removal and Recovery of Metal Ions
from Groundwater.
See 1439
Emerging Technologies: Bio-Recovery Sys-
tems Removal and Recovery of Metal Ions
from Groundwater. Appendices.
See 1440
Evaluation of Ground-Water Extraction Rem-
edies: Phase 2. Volume 1. Summary Report.
See 1444
Evaluation of Ground-Water Extraction Rem-
edies: Phase 2. Volume 2. Case Studies and
Updates.
See 1445
Evaluation of Ground-Water Extraction Rem-
edies. Volume 2. Case Studies 1-19
See 1446
Evaluation of Ground-Water Extraction Rem-
edies. Volume 3. General Site Data: Data
Base Reports.
See 1447
Evaluation of Soil Venting Application.
Ground Water Issue.
See 1505
Evaluation of Unsaturated/Valdose Zone
Models for Superfund Sites.
See 1449
Facilitated Transport. Series of Issue Papers
(3rd).
See 1451
Forum on Innovative Hazardous Waste
Treatment Technologies: Domestic and
International. Held in Atlanta, Georgia on
June 19-21, 1989. Abstract Proceedings.
See 1252
Ground-Water Issue: Characterizing Soils for
Hazardous Waste Site Assessments
See 1455
Ground-Water Issue: Potential Sources of
Error in Ground-Water Sampling at Hazard-
ous Waste Sites.
See 1456
Ground Water Sampling for Metals Analyses.
Superfund Ground Water Issue
See 1459
Guidance for Evaluating the Technical Im-
practicability of Ground-Water Restoration
See 1460
Guide on Remedial Actions for Contaminat-
ed Ground Water.
See 1461
Identification and Compilation of Unsaturat-
ed/Vadose Zone Models.
See 1464
In-situ Bioremediation of Contaminated
Ground Water.
See 1465
In situ Steam Extraction Treatment.
See 1512
In situ Treatment of Contaminated Ground
Water: An Inventory of Research and Field
Demonstrations and Strategies for Improving
Ground Water Remediation Technologies.
See 1466
Innovative Treatment Technologies: Semi-
Annual Status Report (Fourth Edition).
See 1273
International Evaluation of In-situ Biorestora-
tion of Contaminated Soil and Groundwater
(September 1990)-Translation.
See 1517
Methods for Evaluating the Attainment of
Cleanup Standards. Volume 2. Ground
Water.
See 1469
New Approach and Methodologies for Char-
acterizing the Hydrogeologic Properties of
Aquifers.
See 1470
Performance Evaluations of Pump-and-Treat
Remediations.
See 1471
Potential Sources of Error in Ground-Water
Sampling at Hazardous Waste Sites. Ground
Water Issue.
See 1472
Presentations EPA-State Soil Standards
Conference. Held in Crystal City, Virginia on
January 29,1991.
See 1524
Remediation Completed: But Is the Ground-
water Meeting the Safe Drinking Water Act
Requirements. Haztech International 90.
Held in Houston, Texas on May 8-10, 1990
See 1473
Advanced Oxidation Technologies for the
Treatment of Contaminated Groundwater
See 1429
Biodegradation of Creosote and Pentachlor-
ophenol in Contaminated Groundwater:
Chemical and Biological Assessment.
See 1432
Detoxification of Pentachlorophenol and Cre-
osote Contaminated Groundwater by Physi-
cal Extraction: Chemical and Biological As-
sessment.
See 1438
EPA Site Demonstration of BioTrol Aqueous
Treatment System.
See 1441
Evaluating the Effectiveness of Ground
Water Extraction Systems.
See 1443
Extraction of Mercury from Groundwater
Using Immobilized Algae.
See 1450
Field Demonstration of the UV/Oxidation
Technology to Treat Ground Water Contami-
nated with VOCs.
See 1452
Field Evaluation of the UV/Oxidation Tech-
nology to Treat Contaminated Groundwater.
Proceedings of the National Conference
(10th). Held in Washington, DC. on Novem-
ber 27-29, 1989.
See 1453
Filtration of Ground Water Samples for
Metals Analysis.
See 1454
Remediation of Contaminated Soils by Sol-
vent Flushing.
See 1529
ROD Annual Report, FY1991. Volume 1
See 1113
ROD Annual Report, FY1991. Volume 2.
See 1114
Subsurface Contamination Reference Guide
See 1474
Superfund Ground Water Issue: Accuracy of
Depth to Water Measurements. 2nd in
Series of Issue Papers.
See 1476
Superfund Ground Water Issue. Contaminant
Transport In Fractured Media: Models for
Decision Makers.
See 1477
SU-23
-------
GROUND WATER MOVEMENT
SUBJECT INDEX
Supwfund Innovative Technology Evaluation
(SITE) Program Evaluation Report for Antox
i BTX Water Screen (BTX Immunoassay).
St« 1320
Supotfund Remedial Action Decision Proc-
: «8s: Database for Selected FY87 Records of
Decision,
Sm»1136
Tech Trends (Number 8).
S««1328 .............
Technology Evaluation Report: SITE Pro-
gram Demonstration of the Ultrox Interna-
tional Ultraviolet Radiation/Oxidation Tech-
nology.
Seo 1351
Ultrox International Ultraviolet Radiation/Oxi-
dation Technology: Applications Analysis
Report.
Sea 1364
Vandor Information System for Innovative
Treatment Technologies (VISITT). Number 1.
Sea 1370
GROUND WATER MOVEMENT
....... Ground-Water Modeling Compendium.
Model Fact Sheets, Descriptions, Applica-
- ilons and Assessment Framework.
Soa 1458
GROUNOWATER
ROD Annual Report, FY 1990.
See 1112
GBOVELAND (MASSACHUSETTS)
: ....... Terra Vac In situ Vacuum Extraction System:
::: Applications Analysis Report.
See 1356
' '
National Priorities List Sites: American
Samoa, Guam, and the Trust Territories.
Sea 0154
National Priorities List Sites: The United
is States Territories, 1992.
See 0275
GUAM AND tRUST TERRITORIES
National Priorities List Sites: American
Samoa, Guam and Trust Territories.
S«« 0155
GUIDANCE
Guidance on Oversight of PRP Performed
RD/HA.
^ ........ Sea 1130
dSilDEL'lNES
Air/Superfund National Technical Guidance
i Study Series. Contingency Plans at Super-
; food Sites Using Air Monitoring.
See 137S
Assessing Reports of Continuous Releases
of Hazardous Substances: A Guide for EPA
is ....... Regions.
Soe 1142
...... i CERCLA Compliance with Other Laws
Manual: CERCLA Compliance with the CWA
and SOWA.
Sea 0406
CERCLA Compliance with Other Laws
Manual: Guide to Manual.
See 0407
Compliance with Third Third Requirements
Under the LDRs, Superfund LDR Guide No.
8.
Sea 0418
Data Quality Objectives for Remedial Re-
::' sponso Activities: Development Process. Ex-
ample Scenario: RI/FS Activities at a Site
with Contaminated Soils and Ground Water.
Soe 0980
Final Guidance on Implementation of the
'Consistency" Exemption to the Statutory
limits on Removal Actions.
See 1004
Guidance Documents Relating to Landfills
and Contaminants.
See 1259
Guidance on EPA Oversight of Remedial De-
signs and Remedial Actions Performed by
Potentially Responsible Parties.
See 1128
Guidance on Expediting Remedial Design
and Remedial Action.
See 1129
Guide on Remedial Actions at Superfund
Sites with PCB Contamination.
See 1262
Guide to Delisting of RCRA Wastes for Su-
perfund Remedial Responses.
See 0422
Guide to Developing Superfund Proposed
Plans.
See 1099
Guide to Selecting Superfund Remedial Ac-
tions.
See 1100
Interim RCRA/CERCLA Guidance on Non-
Contiguous Sites and On-Site Management
on Waste and Treatment Residue.
See 0427
Obtaining a Soil and Debris Treatability Vari-
ance for Removal Actions. Superfund LDR
Guide No. 6B.
See 0430
Quality Assurance/Quality Control Guidance
for Removal Activities: Sampling QA/QC
Plan and Data Validation Procedures.
See 0993
Removal Cost Management System: Version
3.2.
See 1009
Risk Assessment Guidance for Superfund.
Volume 1. Human Health Evaluation Manual.
Part A, April 1990.
See 1066
Sampler's Guide to the Contract Laboratory
Program.
See 0071
Scoper's Notes: An RI/FS Costing Guide.
Bringing in a Quality RI/FS on Time and
Within Budget.
See 1117
Superfund LDR Guide No. 1: Overview of
RCRA Land Disposal Restrictions (LDRs).
See 0440
Superfund LDR Guide No. 2: Complying with
the California List Restrictions under Land
Disposal Restrictions (LDRs).
See 0441
Superfund LDR Guide No. 3: Treatment
Standards and Minimum Technology Re-
quirements under Land Disposal Restrictions
(LDRS).
See 0442
Superfund LDR Guide No. 4: Complying with
the Hammer Restrictions under Land Dis-
posal Restrictions (LDRs).
See 0443
Superfund LDR Guide No. 5: Determining
When Land Disposal Restrictions (LDRs) Are
'Applicable' to CERCLA Response Actions.
See 0444
Superfund Removal Procedures: Action
Memorandum Guidance.
See 1012
GUIDES (INSTRUCTIONS)
User's Guide to Contract Laboratory Pro-
gram.
See 0078
HABITABILITY
Evaluating Amphibian Responses in Wet-
lands Impacted by Mining Activities in the
Western United States.
See 1586
HALOGEN ORGANIC COMPOUNDS
Chemical Dehalogenation Treatment: APEG
Treatment.
See 1210
HANDBOOKS
Community Relations in Superfund: A Hand-
book.
See 0467
Endangerment Assessment Handbook.
See 0530
Handbook: Responding to Discharges of
Sinking Hazardous Substances.
See 1589
Superfund Reauthorization: NACEPT Sub-
committee Handbook.
See 0331
HAWAII
National Priorities List Sites: California and
Hawaii.
See 0163
National Priorities List Sites: California and
Hawaii, 1992.
See 0164
National Priorities List Sites: Hawaii.
See 0180
HAZARD RANKING SYSTEM
Closing the NPL Book under the Original
HRS.
See 0337
Hazard Ranking System Guidance Manual.
See 0346
Hazard Ranking System Guidance Manual.
See 0347
PA-Score (Preliminary Assessment Score),
Version 2.1, 3 1/2 inch (for Microcomput-
ers).
See 0369
PA-Score (Preliminary Assessment Score),
Version 2.1, 5 1/4 inch (for Microcomput-
ers).
See 0370
Preliminary Ranking Evaluation Score
(PREscore) Version 1.1 (for Microcomput-
ers).
See 0372
Revised Hazard Ranking System: An Im-
proved Tool for Screening Superfund Sites.
See 0377
Revised Hazard Ranking System: Back-
ground Information.
See 0378
Revised Hazard Ranking System: Qs and
As.
See 0381
HAZARDOUS MATERIALS
Abstract Proceedings: Forum on Innovative
Hazardous Waste Treatment Technologies;
Domestic and International (2nd). Held in
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania on May 15-17,
1990.
See 1186
Abstract Proceedings: Superfund Technical
Support Project General Meeting. Held in
Athens, Georgia on December 3-6, 1990.
See 1187
Accelerating Potentially Responsible Party
Remedial Design Starts: Implementing the
30-Day Study.
See 0509
Accessing Federal Data Bases for Contami-
nated Site Clean-Up Technologies.
See 1188
Accessing the $50 Million Set-Aside in the
Remedial Action Budget for Quick Response
at National Priorities List Sites.
See 1082
SU-24
-------
SUBJECT INDEX
HAZARDOUS MATERIALS
Achieving Greater Consistency between
Subjective and Objective Risks
See 1017
Administrative Guidance for the FIT to ARCS
(FIT/ARCS) Transition.
See 0017
Administrative Order on Consent for Reme-
dial Investigations/Feasibility Study
See 0510
Administrative Penalty Procedures
See 0511
Advancing the Use of Treatment Technol-
ogies for Superfund Remedies
See 1191
Air/Superfund National Technical Guidance
Series. Superfund Air Pathway Analyses
Review Criteria Checklists.
See 1372
Air/Superfund National Technical Guidance
Study Series. Air Emissions from Area
Sources: Estimating Soil and Soil-Gas
Sample Number Requirements.
See 1373
Air/Superfund National Technical Guidance
Study Series: Applicability of Open Path
Monitors for Superfund
See 1375
Air/Superfund National Technical Guidance
Study Series: Compilation of Information on
Real-Time Air Monitoring for Use at Suoer-
fund Sites.
See 1377
Air/Superfund National Technical Guidance
Study Series: Estimation of Air Impacts for
Soil Vapor Extraction (SVE) Systems.
See 1383
Air/Superfund National Technical Guidance
Study Series: Evaluation of Short-Term Air
Action Levels for Superfund Sites.
See 1386
Air/Superfund National Technical Guidance
Study Series. Volume 1. Application of Air
Pathway Analyses for Superfund Activities
See 1390
Air/Superfund National Technical Guidance
Study Series. Volume 2. Estimation of Base-
line Air Emissions at Superfund Sites (Re-
vised).
See 1392
Air/Superfund National Technical Guidance
Study Series. Volume 4. Guidance for Ambi-
ent Air Monitoring at Superfund Sites (Re-
vised).
See 1393
Air/Superfund National Technical Guidance
Study Series. Volume 4. Procedures for Dis-
persion Modeling and Air Monitoring for Su-
perfund Air Pathway Analysis.
See 1394
Amendment to Historical Definitions of NPL
Deletion Start and Completion Dates.
See 0335
American Combustion Pyretron Destruction
System. Applications Analysis Report.
See 1193
Analysis of State Superfund Programs: 50-
State Study.
See 0447
Analysis of State Superfund Programs- 50-
State Study, 1990 Update.
See 0448
Analysis of State Superfund Programs- 50-
State Study. 1991 Update.
See 0449
Annual RREL Research Symposium (20th)
Abstract Proceedings. Held in Cincinnati,
Ohio on March 15-17, 1994
See 1184
Applicability of Land Disposal Restrictions to
RCRA and CERCLA Ground Water Treat-
ment Reinjection Superfund Management
Review: Recommendation No. 26
See 1430
Applications Analysis Report: Silicate Tech-
nology Corporation's Solidification/Stabiliza-
tion Technology for Organic and Inorganic
Contaminants in Soils.
See 1550
Applications Analysis Report: SITE Program,
CF Systems Organics Extraction System
New Bedford, Massachusetts.
See 1196
Approval of Long Term Contracting Strategy
for Superfund (Superfund Management
Review: Recommendation E.2).
See 0018
ARAR's Q's and A's. Compliance with the
Toxicity Characteristics Rule. Part 1.
See 0396
ARARs Fact Sheet: Compliance with the
Clean Air Act and Associated Air Quality Re-
quirements.
See 0397
ARARs Q's and A's.
See 0398
ARARS Q's and A's: Compliance with Fed-
eral Water Quality Criteria.
See 0399
ARARs Q's and A's: General Policy, RCRA
CWA, SDWA, Post-ROD Information, and
Contingent Waivers.
See 0401
ARARs Q's and A's: State Ground-Water
Antidegradation Issues.
See 0402
ARARs Q's and A's: The Fund-Balancinq
Waiver.
See 0403
Arbitration Procedures for Small Superfund
Cost Recovery Claims.
See 0512
ARCS (Alternative Remedial Contract Strate-
gy) Contracts Users' Manual.
See 0019
ARCS Construction Contract Modification
Procedures.
See 0020
ARCS Work Assignment Management: Field
Guide.
See 0021
Assessing Potential Indoor Air Impacts for
Superfund Sites. Air/Superfund National
Technical Guidance Study Series
See 1395
Assessing Reports of Continuous Releases
of Hazardous Substances: A Guide for EPA
Regions.
See 1142
, Assessment of International Technologies
for Superfund Applications: Technology
Review and Trip Report Results.
See 1197
Assessment of Technologies for the Reme-
diation of Radioactively Contaminated Su-
perfund Sites.
See 1198
Assessment of Tentatively Identified Com-
pounds in Superfund Samples.
See 1199
Assurance of Hazardous Waste Capacity
Guidance to State Officials. Assistance in
Fulfilling the Requirements of CERCLA
104(c)(9).
See 0129
ATSDR Health Consultations under
CERCLA.
See 1018
Audits and the Superfund Program Manaqer
See 0087
Authority to Use CERCLA to Provide En-
forcement Funding Assistance to States.
See 0450
Authorization for Regional Administrators to
Approve Consistency Exemptions at NPL
Sites.
See 0998
AWD Technologies Integrated AquaDetox
(Trade Name)/SVE Technology: Applications
Analysis Report.
See 1202
Babcock and Wilcox Cyclone Furnace Vitrifi-
cation. Technology Demonstration Summary.
See 1203
Basic Concepts of Contaminant Sorption at
Hazardous Waste Sites (Ground Water
Issue).
See 1431
Bibliography of Federal Reports and Publica-
tions Describing Alternative and Innovative
Treatment Technologies for Corrective
Action and Site Remediation.
See 1206
Bioremediation: An Information Update on
Applying Bioremediation to Site Cleanup.
See 1421
Bioremediation in the Field. An Information
Update on Applying Bioremediation to Site
Clean-Up. Number 3.
See 1422
Bioremediation in the Field: An Information
Update on Applying Bioremediation to Site
Cleanup. (Number 4).
See 1423
Bioremediation in the Field: Number 1, No-
vember 1990.
See 1424
Carver-Greenfield Process (Trade Name)
Dehydro-Tech Corporation. Applications
Analysis Report.
See 1207
CERCLA Community Relations Mailing Lists.
See 0451
CERCLA Compliance with Other Environ-
mental Statutes.
See 0404
CERCLA Compliance with Other Laws
Manual: CERCLA Compliance with the CWA
and SDWA.
See 0406
CERCLA Compliance with Other Laws
Manual: Guide to Manual.
See 0407
CERCLA Compliance with Other Laws
Manual: Overview of ARARs - Focus on
ARAR Waivers.
See 0408
CERCLA Compliance with Other Laws
Manual: RCRA ARARS-Focus on Closure
Requirements.
See 0410
CERCLA Compliance with the RCRA Toxici-
ty Characteristics (TC) Rule: Part 2.
See 0412
CERCLA Enforcement Policy Compendium
Update.
See 0516
CERCLA Implementation of the Training Re-
quirements of EPA Order 3500.1. Inspector
Training.
See 0518
CERCLA Notifications: Emergency Re-
sponse Notification System (ERNS) Fact
Sheet.
See 0926
CERCLA Site Discharges to POTWS
CERCLA Site Sampling Program: Detailed
Data Report.
See 1575
SU-25
-------
HAZARDOUS MATERIALS
SUBJECT INDEX
CERCLA Site Discharges to POTWS Treat-
ability Manual.
Sea 1577
CERCLA/Superfund Orientaflon Manual.
Seo0130
5ERCLA Waste Capacity Assurance.
fee 0131 ..................
SEROUS Characterization Project National
Results.
See 0001
CERCUS Characterization Project Region 1
..........
Sea 0002
CERCUS Characterization Project Region 2
' "" ""
,., „
Sao 0003
CERCUS Characterization Project: Region 3
Results.
See 0004
CERCUS Characterization Project Region 4
Results.
S000005
CERCUS Characterization Project Region 5
Results.
S«a0006
CERCUS Characterization Project Region 6
Results,
"sWOfJO? ...................
CERCUS Characterization Project: Region 7
Results.
Sao 0008
QERCUS Characterization Project Region 8
"'Metuits,
See 0009
CERCUS Characterization Project Region 9
Remits.
Sea 0010
CERCUS Characterization Project Region
10 Results.
SN 0011
CERCJUS (Comprehensive Environmental
Response, Compensation, and Uability Infor-
malion System) Stte Location Extract.
Sea 0012
CERCUS Listing.
Sea 0014
CERCUS - WasteLAN - CleanLAN.
Ses 0015
Characterization Protocol for Radioactive
Contaminated Soils.
Sea 1484
Characterizing soils for hazardous waste site
assessments.
See 1495
Chemftx Tachnotogles, Inc. Solidification/
1 Stabilization Process. Application Analysis
Report.
See 1551
; Chamteal pahalpgenatlon Treatability Stud-
ies under CERCTAt An Overview.
Sea 1153
Chamicai Dehalogenaflon Treatability Stud-
ies under CERCLA: An Overview.
Sea 1209
: Chsmfcal Oxidation Treatment. Engineering
Bulletin.
Sea 1211
Citizen's Guide to Air Sparging.
So* 0452
Citizen's Guide to Bioventing.
Sea 0453
Citizen's Guide to Glycolate Dehalogenation.
Sao 0454
Citizen's Guide to How Innovative Treatment
Technologies Are Being Successfully Ap-
plied at Superiund Sites.
Sea 0455
Qllzon's Guide to In situ Soil Flushing.
' Se«0456"" ..... "
Citizen's Guide to Innovative Treatment
Technologies for Contaminated Soils,
Sludges, Sediments and Debris.
See 0457
Citizen's Guide to Soil Washing.
See 0458
Citizen's Guide to Solvent Extraction.
See 0459
Citizen's Guide to Thermal Desorption.
See 0460
Citizen's Guide to Using Indigenous and Ex-
ogenous Microorganisms in Bioremediation.
See 0461
Citizens' Guidance Manual for the Technical
Assistance Grant Program.
See 0462
Citizens' Guidance Manual for the Technical
Assistance Grant Program.
See 0463
Clarification of Delegation to Approve Con-
sistency Exemptions at NPL Sites.
See 0336
Cleaning Up the Nation's Waste Sites: Mar-
kets and Technology Trends.
See 0132
Cleanup Information Bulletin Board System
Users Guide. (CLU-IN: Cleanup Information
Bulletin Board).
See 1215
Closing the NPL Book under the Original
MRS.
See 0337
Communicating with the Public About Haz-
ardous Materials: An Examination of Local
Practice. Risk Communication Series.
See 0464
Community Relations during Enforcement
Activities and Development of the Adminis-
trative Record.
See 0465
Community Relations during Enforcement
Activities and Development of the Adminis-
trative Record.
See 0466
Community Relations in Superfund: A Hand-
book.
See 0467
Community Relations: Use of Senior Envi-
ronmental Employees in Superfund (Super-
fund Management Review: Recommendation
43.K.L).
See 0088
Comparative Analysis of Remedies Selected
in the Superfund Program during FY 87, FY
88 and FY 89.
See 0519
Compendium of ERT Air Sampling Proce-
dures.
See 0901
Compendium of ERT Field Analytical Proce-
dures.
See 0902
Compendium of ERT Groundwater Sampling
Procedures.
See 0903
Compendium of ERT Soil Sampling and Sur-
face Geophysics Procedures.
See 0904
Compendium of ERT Surface Water and
Sediment Sampling Procedures.
See 0905
Compendium of ERT Toxicity Testing Proce-
dures.
See 0906
Compendium of ERT Waste Sampling Pro-
cedures.
See 0907
Compendium of NPL Listing Policies and
Procedures, 1982 to 1985.
See 0338
Compendium of ROD Language for FY 1993
Focus Areas.
See 1083
Compliance with Third Third Requirements
Under the LDRs. Superfund LDR Guide No.
8.
See 0418
Computer Models Used to Support Cleanup
Decision-Making at Hazardous and Radioac-
tive Waste Sites.
See 1218
Conducting Non-Time-Critical Removal Ac-
tions under CERCLA.
See 0999
Conducting Remedial Investigations/Feasi-
bility Studies for CERCLA Municipal Landfill
Sites.
See 1084
Congressional Limits for FY 92 Alternative
Remedial Contracting Strategy (ARCS) Pro-
gram Management Costs.
See 0022
Consent Orders and the Reimbursement
Provision Under Section 106(b) of CERCLA.
See 0520
Consideration of ARARs during Removal Ac-
tions.
See 0419
Consideration of RCRA Requirements in
Performing CERCLA Responses at Mining
Waste Sites.
See 0420
Considerations in Ground Water Remedi-
ation at Superfund Sites.
See 1436
Consultation on Records of Decision
(RODS) for Containment-Only Remedies.
See 0521
Contingency Analysis Modeling for Super-
fund Sites and Other Sources.
See 1219
Continuous Release-Emergency Response
Notification System and Priority Assessment
Model: Model Documentation.
See 1143
Continuous Release-Emergency Response
Notification System and Priority Assessment
Model: User's Manual for EPA Regions.
See 1144
Continuous Release - Emergency Response
Notification System. User's Manual for In-
dustry.
See 1145
Contracting and Subcontracting Guide to the
Superfund Program.
See 0023
Control of Air Emissions from Materials Han-
dling during Remediation. Engineering Bulle-
tin.
See 1398 _«.,..
Control of Air Emissions from Superfund Air
Strippers at Superfund Groundwater Sites.
See 1399
Control of Air Emissions from Superfund
Sites.
See 1400
Coordination of EPA and State Actions in
Cost Recovery.
See 0522
Cost of Remedial Action Model.
See 1085
Cost of Remedial Actions (CORA) Model:
Overview and Applications.
See 1086
Cost Recovery Actions/Statute of Limita-
tions.
See 0523
Cost Recovery Actions under CERCLA.
See 0524
SU-26
I iiitl i Li
,i.:li,, IKltii, ili '
-------
SUBJECT INDEX
HAZARDOUS MATERIALS
Cost Recovery Referrals.
See 0525
Counting State-Lead Enforcement NPL Sites
Toward the CERCLA Section 116(e) Reme-
dial Action Start Mandate.
See 0468
Covenants Not to Sue under SARA.
See 0526
Criminal Investigations and the Superfund
Program.
See 0469
CWM PO*WW*ER (Trade Name) Evapora-
tion-Catalytic Oxidation Technology: Applica-
tions Analysis Report.
See 1225
Data Quality Objectives Process for Super-
fund.
See 0981
Debarment and Suspension.
See 0470
Demonstration of a Trial Excavation at the
McColl Superfund Site.
See 1226
Demonstration of Waste Treatment Technol-
ogies.
See 1229
Determination of Imminent and Substantial
Endangerment for Removal Actions.
See 1000
Determining Soil Response Action Levels
Based on Potential Contaminant Migration to
Ground Water: A Compendium of Examples.
See 1497
Development of Emerging Technologies
within the SITE Program.
See 1231
Discussions with the Public Concerning NPL
Listings.
See 0339
Distribution of DRAFT Soil Screening Level
Guidance.
See 1500
DuPpnt/Oberlin Microfiltration Technology.
Applications Analysis Report.
See 1584
ECO Update: Ecological Assessment of Su-
perfund Sites. An Overview. Volume 1,
Number 2, December 1991.
See 1019
ECO Update: The Role of BTAGs in Ecologi-
cal Assessment. Volume 1, Number 1 Sep-
tember1991.
See 1020
ECO Update. Volume 1, Number 3. The
Role of Natural Resource Trustees in the
Superfund Process.
See 1021
ECO Update. Volume 1, Number 4. Develop-
ing a Work Scope for Ecological Assess-
ments.
See 1022
ECO Update. Volume 1, Number 5, August
1992. Briefing the STAG: Initial Description
of Setting, History, and Ecology of a Site
See 1023
Ecological Risk Assessment Methods: A
Review and Evaluation of Past Practices in
the Superfund and RCRA (Resource Conser-
vation and Recovery Act) Programs (Execu-
tive Summary Included).
See 1024
Ecological Risk Management in the Super-
fund and RCRA (Resource Conservation and
Recovery Act) Programs.
See 1025
Ecosystem Effects of Superfund. National
Priority List Sites in Industrial Landscapes: A
Framework for Policy Decisions.
See 0135
Effect of OSHA's Bloodborne Pathogens
Standard on Hazardous Waste Cleanup Ac-
tivities.
See 1026
Emergency Responders Agreements for
Fund-Lead Remedial Actions.
See 1001
Emergency Response Cleanup Services
Contracts (ERGS). Users Manual.
See 0024
Emergency Response Notification System.
See 0927
Endangerment Assessment Guidance.
See 0527
Endangerment Assessment Guidance.
See 0528
Endangerment Assessment Handbook.
See 0529
Endangerment Assessment Handbook.
See 0530
Enforcement Project Management Hand-
book.
See 0531
Enforcement Project Management Hand-
book.
See 0532
Enforcement Project Management Hand-
book.
See 0533
Enforcement under SACM: Interim Guid-
ance. Volume 1, Number 3, December 1992.
See 0090
Engineering Bulletin: Pyrolysis Treatment.
See 1234
Engineering Bulletin: Slurry Walls.
See 1235
Engineering Bulletin: Technology Preselec-
tion Data Requirements.
See 1405
Enhancing State Superfund Capabilities:
Nine-State Study.
See 0471
Ensuring the Adequacy of Cost Share Provi-
sions in Superfund State Contracts.
See 0472
Entry and Continued Access under CERCLA.
See 0534
Environmental Asbestos Assessment
Manual. Superfund Method for the Determi-
nation of Asbestos in Ambient Air. Part 1.
Method.
See 1027
Environmental Asbestos Assessment
Manual. Superfund Method for the Determi-
nation of Asbestos in Ambient Air. Part 2.
Technical Background Document.
See 1028
Environmental Compliance Branch, Standard
Operating Procedures and Quality Assurance
Manual, Revision 1.
See 0535
EPA Interim Guidance on Indemnification of
Superfund Response Action Contractors
Under Section 119 of SARA.
See 0536
EPA/Navy CERCLA Remedial Action Tech-
nology Guide.
See 1241
EPA Oversight of Remedial Designs and Re-
medial Actions Performed by PRPs.
See 1124
EPA/U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Payment
Process, Direct Cite/Revised Reimburse-
ment Methods.
See 1125
EPA/USACE Payment Process: Direct Cite/
Revised Reimbursement Methods
See 1126
Establishing Work Zones at Uncontrolled
Hazardous Waste Sites.
See 0908
Estimating Potential for Occurrence of
DNAPL at Superfund Sites.
See 1442
Estimating VOC Emissions from Superfund
Sites in the Houston-Galveston Texas Area.
(NNEMS Project No. 1302).
See 1406
Evaluation and Testing of a Protocol to De-
termine the Aerobic Degradation Potential of
Hazardous Waste Constituents in Soil.
See 1503
Evaluation of Cleanup Levels for Remedial
Action at CERCLA (Comprehensive Environ-
mental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) Sites Based on a Review of EPA
(Environmental Protection Agency) Records
of Decision.
See 1245
Evaluation of Commercially-Available Porta-
ble Gas Chromatographs.
See 1478
Evaluation of Ground-Water Extraction Rem-
edies: Phase 2. Volume 1. Summary Report.
See 1444
Evaluation of Ground-Water Extraction Rem-
edies: Phase 2. Volume 2. Case Studies and
Updates.
See 1445
Evaluation of Ground-Water Extraction Rem-
edies. Volume 2. Case Studies 1-19.
See 1446
Evaluation of Ground-Water Extraction Rem-
edies. Volume 3. General Site Data: Data
Base Reports.
See 1447
Evaluation of Soil Venting Application.
Ground Water Issue.
See 1505
Evaluation of Terrestrial Indicators for Use in
Ecological Assessments at Hazardous
Waste Sites.
See 1249
Evaluation of the Likelihood of DNAPL Pres-
ence at NPL Sites: National Results.
See 1448
Evaluation of Unsaturated/Valdose Zone
Models for Superfund Sites.
See 1449
Exercising Flexibility through the Superfund
Accelerated Cleanup Model (SACM).
See 0091
Expanded Civil Judicial Referral Procedures.
See 0539
Expansion of Direct Referral of Cases to the
Department of Justice.
See 0540
Expedited Response Actions.
See 1003
Expediting Remedial Construction.
See 1127
Extending the Tracking of Analytical Serv-
ices to Potentially Responsible Party-Lead
Superfund Sites (Supplemental Guidance on
OSWER Directive 9240.0-2A).
See 0986
Facilitated Transport. Series of Issue Papers
(3rd).
See 1451
Feasibility Study: Detailed Analysis of Reme-
dial Action Alternatives.
See 1088
Feasibility Study: Development and Screen-
ing of Remedial Action Alternatives.
See 1089
Field Applications of Robotic Systems in
Hazardous Environments, p1-29 1993. See
also PB86-176344 and PB92-166743.
See 1251
SU-27
-------
HAZARDOUS MATERIALS
SUBJECT INDEX
Field Standard Operating Procedures for Air
Surveillance F.S.O.P. No. 8.
Sco 0910
FteW Standard Operating Procedures for Es-
tablishing Work Zones (F.S.O.P. 6).
Soo0911
Reid Standard Operating Procedures for
Preparation of a Site Safety Plan F.S.O.P.
'So, 9. .......................
See 0912
Field Standard Operating Procedures for the
Decontamination of Response Personnel
F.S.O.P. No. 7.
See 0913
.Final EPA Policy on the Inclusion of Environ-
• "mortal Auditing Provisions in Enforcement
Settlements.
Se« 0541
Final Guidance on Administrative Records
for Selecting CERCLA Response Actions.
Se« 0473
Final Guidance on Implementation of the
'Consistency' Exemption to the Statutory
..... limits on Removal Actions.
Sat 1004 .................
i Final Guidance on Preparing Waste-In Lists
and Volumetric Rankings for Release to Po-
tentially Responsible Parties (PRPs) under
CERCLA ('Waste-In' Guidance).
Soa 0542
Final Policy on Setting RI/FS Priorities.
Soa 1090
Forum Focus, August 1993.
Soa 0136
Forum on Innovative Hazardous Waste
Treatment Technologies: Domestic and
Mntofnational. Held in Atlanta, Georgia on
..... Juna 19-21, 1989. Technical Papers.
Sea 1253
Forum on Innovative Hazardous Waste
Treatment Technologies (3rd): Domestic and
International. Held In Dallas, Texas on June
11-13, 1991. Technical Papers.
Sea 1254
funding of State Enforcement Related Ac-
'
Sea 0474
3 Further Direction on Implementing the Su-
,. perfund Accelerated Cleanup Model (SACM).
See 0093
Furthering the Dse of Innovative Treatment
Technologies In OSWER Programs.
See 1255
Furthering the Use of Innovative Treatment
Technologies in OSWER Programs.
Sea 1256
FY 1992 Themes for Regional Coordination
to Support Continuous Improvements of Su-
perfund's Remedial Program.
Sea 1091
Getting Ready: Scoping the RI/FS.
See 1092
Granular Activated Carbon Treatment Engi-
neering Bulletin.
Sea 1258
Ground-Water issue: Characterizing Soils for
Hazardous Waste Site Assessments.
See 1455
Ground Water Sampling for Metals Analyses.
Supertund Ground Water Issue.
See 1459
; Guidance Documents Relating to Landfills
and Contaminants.
' See 1259 ..................
Guidance for Capacity~Assurance Planning.
; Capacity Planning Pursuant to CERCLA Sec-
36n 104(c)(9).
See 0137
-"Guidance for Coordinating ATSDR Health
Assessment Activities with the Superfund
Remedial Process.
Sea 1029
SU-28
Guidance for Data Useability in Risk Assess-
ment.
See 1030
Guidance for Data Useability in Risk Assess-
ment.
See 1031
Guidance for Data Useability in Risk Assess-
ment. Interim Report.
See 1032
Guidance for Data Useability in Risk Assess-
ment (Part A).
See 1033
Guidance for Environmental Priorities Initia-
tive (EPI) Facilities in the Superfund Pre-Re-
medial Program.
See 0341
Guidance for Organizing ARCS Contract
Files.
See 0025
Guidance for Performing Preliminary Assess-
ments under CERCLA.
See 0342
Guidance for Performing Site Inspections
under CERCLA.
See 0343
Guidance of the Use of Stipulated Penalties
in Hazardous Waste Consent Decrees.
See 0544
Guidance on Applicability of EPA Order
3500.1 to CERCLA Staff.
See 0545
Guidance on Applying the Data Quality Ob-
jectives Process for Ambient Air Monitoring
Around Superfund Sites (Stage 3).
See 0987
Guidance on Applying the Data Quality Ob-
jectives Process for Ambient Air Monitoring
Around Superfund Sites (Stages 1 and 2).
See 0988
Guidance on CERCLA Section 106 Judicial
Actions.
See 0546
Guidance on CERCLA Settlements with De
Micromis Waste Contributors.
See 0547
Guidance on CERCLA 106(a) Unilateral Ad-
ministrative Orders for Remedial Designs
and Remedial Actions.
See 0548
Guidance on Documenting Decisions Not to
Take Cost Recovery Actions.
See 0549
Guidance on Drafting Consent Decrees in
Hazardous Waste Cases.
See 0550
Guidance on EPA Oversight of Remedial De-
signs and Remedial Actions Performed by
Potentially Responsible Parties.
See 1128
Guidance on Expediting Remedial Design
and Remedial Action.
See 1129
Guidance on Federal Superfund Liens.
See 0551
Guidance on Implementation of the 'Contrib-
ute to Remedial Performance' Provision.
See 1093
Guidance on Implementation of the Super-
fund Accelerated Cleanup Model (SACM)
under CERCLA and the NCP.
See 0094
Guidance on Landowner Liability under Sec-
tion 107(a)(1) of CERCLA, De Minimis Set-
tlements under Section 122(g)(1)(B) of
CERCLA, and Settlements with Prospective
Purchasers of Contaminated Property.
See 0552
Guidance on Oversight of Potentially Re-
sponsible Party Remedial Investigations and
Feasibility Studies. Volume 1.
See 1094
Guidance on Oversight of Potentially Re-
sponsible Party Remedial Investigations and
Feasibility Studies. Volume 2. Appendices.
See 1095
Guidance on Premium Payments in CERCLA
Settlements.
See 0553
Guidance on Preparing Waste-in Lists and
Volumetric Rankings for Release to Poten-
tially Responsible Parties (PRPs) under
CERCLA.
See 0554
Guidance on Procedures for Submitting
CERCLA Section 106(b) Reimbursement Pe-
titions and on EPA Review of Those Peti-
tions.
See 0555
Guidance on Program Management Activi-
ties under ARCS.
See 0026
Guidance on Remedial Actions for Super-
fund Sites with PCB Contamination.
See 1260
Guidance on Remedial Actions for Super-
fund Sites with PCB Contamination.
See 1261
Guidance Regarding CERCLA Enforcement
against Bankrupt Parties.
See 0556
Guide for Conducting Treatability Studies
under CERCLA.
See 1154
Guide for Conducting Treatability Studies
under CERCLA.
See 1155
Guide for Conducting Treatability Studies
under CERCLA: Aerobic Biodegradation
Remedy Screening.
See 1156
Guide for Conducting Treatability Studies
under CERCLA: Aerobic Biodegradation
Remedy Screening. Interim Guidance.
See 1157
Guide for Conducting Treatability Studies
under CERCLA: Aerobic Biodegradation
Remedy Screening. Quick Reference Fact
Sheet.
See 1158
Guide for Conducting Treatability Studies
under CERCLA: Biodegradation Remedy Se-
lection. Interim Guidance. .
See 1159
Guide for Conducting Treatability Studies
under CERCLA: Biodegradation Remedy Se-
lection. Quick Reference Fact Sheet.
See 1160
Guide for Conducting Treatability Studies
under CERCLA: Chemical Dehalogenation.
See 1161
Guide for Conducting Treatability Studies
under CERCLA: Chemical Dehalogenation.
Final Report.
See 1162
Guide for Conducting Treatability Studies
under CERCLA: Soil Vapor Extraction. Inter-
im Guidance.
See 1163
Guide for Conducting Treatability Studies
under CERCLA: Soil Vapor Extraction. Quick
Reference Fact Sheet.
See 1164
Guide for Conducting Treatability Studies
under CERCLA Solvent Extraction. Interim
Guidance.
See 1167
Guide for Conducting Treatability Studies
under CERCLA: Solvent Extraction Quick
Reference Fact Sheet.
See 1168
!l
-------
SUBJECT INDEX
HAZARDOUS MATERIALS
Guide for Conducting Treatability Studies
under CERCLA: Thermal Desorption Quick
Reference Fact Sheet.
See 1169
Guide: Methods for Evaluating the Attain-
ment of Cleanup Standards for Soils and
Solid Media.
See 1508
Guide on Remedial Actions at Superfund
Sites with PCB Contamination.
See 1262
Guide to Addressing Pre-ROD and Post-
ROD Changes.
See 1096
Guide to Community Involvement for Site
Assessment Managers.
See 0476
Guide to Delisting of RCRA Wastes for Su-
perfund Remedial Responses.
See 0422
Guide to Developing Action Memorandums.
See 1097
Guide to Developing Superfund No Action,
Interim Action, and Contingency Remedy
RODs.
See 1098
Guide to Developing Superfund Proposed
Plans.
See 1099
Guide to Discharging CERCLA Aqueous
Wastes to Publicly Owned Treatment Works
(POTWs).
See 0423
Guide to Obtaining No Migration Variances
for CERCLA Remedial Actions.
See 0424
Guide to Pump and Treat Groundwater Re-
mediation Technology.
See 1462
Guide to Removal Enforcement.
See 1006
Guide to Selecting Superfund Remedial Ac-
tions.
See 1100
Harmonization of QA Procedures for Envi-
ronmental Data Operations: Development of
a National Consensus Standard for Quality
Assurance for Environmental Proqrams
See 0989
Hazard Ranking System Guidance Manual.
See 0346
Hazardous Waste Operations and Emergen-
cy Response: Uncontrolled Hazardous
Waste Sites and RCRA Corrective Actions.
See 0425
Hazardous Waste Operations and Emergen-
cy Response: RCRA TSD and Emergency
Response Without Regard to Location '
See 0914
Hazardous Waste Superfund Collection: Da-
tabase Thesaurus.
See 0138
Hazmat Team Planning Guidance.
See 0915
Headquarters Support Contract Management
Procedures.
See 0029
Health and Safety Roles and Responsibilities
at Remedial Sites.
See 0918
Health Effects Assessment for Benzene
See 1035
Health Effects Assessment for Cadmium
See 1036
Health Effects Assessment for Carbon Tet-
rachloride.
See 1037
Health Effects Assessment for Chlordane
See 1038
Health Effects Assessment for Chloroben-
zene.
See 1039
Health Effects Assessment for Chloroform.
See 1040
Health Effects Assessment for DDT.
See 1041
Health Effects Assessment for Methyl Ethyl
Ketone.
See 1042
Health Effects Assessment for Methylene
Chloride.
See 1043
Health Effects Assessment for Naphthalene
See 1044
Health Effects Assessment for Phenol
See 1045
Health Effects Assessment for Styrene.
See 1046
Health Effects Assessment for Tetrachlor-
oethylene.
See 1047
Health Effects Assessment for Trichloroethy-
lene.
See 1048
Health Effects Assessment for Xylenes.
See 1049
Health Effects Assessment for 2,4,5-Trichlor-
ophenoxy Acetic Acid (2,4,5-T).
See 1050
Health Effects Assessment Summary
Tables.
See 1051
Health Effects Assessment Summary
Tables.
See 1052
Health Effects Assessment Summary
Tables. y
See 1053
Health Effects Assessment Summary Tables
Fourth Quarter FY 1989.
See 1054
Highlights: Superfund Program Management.
Fiscal Year 1993.
See 0095
Homeowners Exempted from Superfund
Cleanup Costs: National Policy Overview.
See 0426
Horsehead Resource Development Compa-
ny, Inc., Flame Reactor Technology. Tech-
nology Demonstration Summary.
See 1264
HSED SACM Report. Volume 1, Number 1,
January 1993.
See 0096
Hydrogeology and Results of Aquifer Tests
in the Vicinity of a Hazardous-Waste Dispos-
al Site Near Byron, Illinois.
See 1463
Identification and Compilation of Unsaturat-
ed/Vadose Zone Models.
See 1464
Identification of a Senior Superfund Official
for Addressing Special NPL Site-Related
Issues.
See 0348
Immobilization Technology Seminar: Speaker
Slide Copies and Supporting Information.
See 1555
Implementation of the Alternative Remedial
Contracting Strategy (ARCS) Task Force
Recommendations: Transmittai of the Imple-
mentation Plan.
See 0030
Implementation of the Decentralized Con-
tractor Performance Evaluation and Award
Fee Process for Selected Remedial Program
Contracts.
See 0031
Implementation of the Superfund Alternative
Remedial Contracting Strategy (ARCS):
Report of the Administrator's Task Force.
Implementation Plan.
See 0032
Implementing the Deputy Administrator's
Risk Characterization Memorandum.
See 1056
In situ Soil Flushing. Engineering Bulletin.
See 1510
In situ Soil Vapor Extraction Treatment.
See 1511
In-situ Stabilization/Solidification of PCB
(Polychlorinated Biphenyls)-Contaminated
Soil.
See 1556
In situ Steam Extraction Treatment.
See 1512
In situ Treatment of Contaminated Ground
Water: An Inventory of Research and Field
Demonstrations and Strategies for Improving
Ground Water Remediation Technologies.
See 1466
Initiation of PRP-Financed Remedial Design
in Advance of Consent Decree Entry (Final).
See 0557
Initiatives to Streamline the Alternative Re-
medial Contracting Strategy (ARCS) Con-
tracts' Award Fee Process.
See 0033
Innovative Methods to Increase Public In-
volvement in Superfund Community Rela-
tions (Superfund Management Review Rec-
ommendation No. 43.A).
See 0097
Innovative Operational Treatment Technol-
ogies for Application to Superfund Site: Nine
Case Studies.
See 1269
Innovative Technology: BEST Solvent Ex-
traction Process.
See 1270
Innovative Technology: Glycolate Dehalo-
genation.
See 1513
Innovative Technology: In-situ Vitrification.
See 1514
Innovative Technology: Slurry-Phase Biode-
gradation.
See 1271
Innovative Technology: Soil Washing.
See 1515
Innovative Treatment Technologies: Over-
view and Guide to Information Sources.
See 1272
Innovative Treatment Technologies: Semi-
Annual Status Report (Fourth Edition).
See 1273
Innovative Treatment Technologies: Semi-
Annual Status Report, January 1991. First
Issue.
See 1274
Inside the Hotline: A Compilation of 1992
Monthly Hotline Reports.
See 0141
Installation Restoration Program. Technical
Support Document for Record of Decision,
Cape Newenham, AFS.
See 1276
Integrated Timeline for Superfund Site Man-
agement (SMR 5,15).
See 0098
Interim Cashout Settlement Procedures.
See 0558
Interim CERCLA Settlement Policy.
See 0559
Interim Final Guidance Package on Funding
CERCLA State Enforcement Actions at NPL
Sites.
See 0477
Interim Guidance for Soil Ingestion Rates.
See 1057
SU-29
-------
HAZARDOUS MATERIALS
SUBJECT INDEX
Interim Guidance on Establishing Soil Lead
Cleanup Levels at Superfund Sites. Supple-
mont to Interim Guidance on Establishing
Sot! Lead Cleanup Levels at Superfund
Sites.
S«al516
: Interim Guidance on Notice Letters, Negotia-
tions, and Information Exchange.
Soe 0560
Interim Guidance on Potentially Responsible
Party Participation in Remedial Investigations
and Feasibility Studies.
See 0561
Interim Guidance on Settlements with De
Mlnjmis Waste Contributors under Section
I22(g)of SARA.
Sea 0562
iii interim Guidance: Streamlining the CERCLA
Settlement Decision Process.
SOQ0563
Interim Guidelines for Preparing Nonbinding
Preliminary Allocations of Responsibility.
Sea 0564
: Worim Modal CERCLA Section 122(g) (4)
1 Da Minimis Waste "Contributor Consent
", Decree and Administrative Order on Con-
sent
Sea 0565
interim RCRA/CERCLA Guidance on Non-
;, Contiguous Sites and On-Site Management
! on Waste and Treatment Residue.
Soa 0427
: International Conference on New Frontiers
tor Hazardous Waste Management (Third)
Proceedings, Held in Pittsburgh, Pennsylva-
nia on September 10-13,1989.
Sea 1278
International Waste Technologies/Geo-Con
. In situ Stabilization/Solidification: Applica-
tions Analysis Report.
Se« 1557
Inventory of Treatability Study Vendors.
Votumel.
Sea 1171
Issuance of Administrative Orders for Imme-
diata Removal Actions.
Sea 0567
Issuance of Administrative Orders Under
Section 3013 of the Resource Conservation
and Recovery Act
See 0568
Issuance of Final Revised Guidance on the
£ Usa and Issuance of Administrative Orders
:, Under Section 7003 of the Resource Con-
; Tservation and Recovery Act (RCRA).
See 0569
Land Disposal Restrictions as Relevant and
Appropriate Requirements for CERCLA Con-
L laminated Soil and Debris.
Sea 0428
Liability of Corporate Shareholders and Suc-
cessor Corporations for Abandoned Sites
Under the Comprehensive Environmental
Response, Compensation and Liability Act.
See 0570
Umitod-Uso Chemical Protective Clothing for
EPA Superfund Activities.
Sea 1058
Limiting Lead Transfers to Private Parties
during Discrete Phases of the Remedial
; process.
Saa 0571
Literature Survey of Innovative Technologies
"" for Hazardous Waste Site Remediation,
1987-1991.
See 1281
Long-Term Contracting Strategy for Super-
fund,
See 0042
, , Long-term Contracting Strategy for Super-
1 fund - Implementation.
See 0043
SU-30
Making Superfund Documents Available to
the Public throughout the Cleanup Process,
and Discussing Site Findings and Decisions
as They are Developed (Superfund Manage-
ment Review: No. 43 G, H, Q, R, T).
See 0100
Management Review of the Superfund Pro-
gram.
See 0101
Management Review of the Superfund Pro-
gram: Implementation Plan.
See 0102
Methodology for Early De Minimis Waste
Contributor Settlements under CERCLA Sec-
tion 122(g) (1) (A).
See 0573
Methodology for Evaluating Potential Car-
cinogenicity in Support of Reportabie Quanti-
ty Adjustments Pursuant to CERCLA Section
102.
See 1146
Methods for Evaluating the Attainment of
Cleanup Standards. Volume 2. Ground
Water.
See 1469
Military Base Closures: Guidance on EPA
Concurrence in the Identification of Unconta-
minated Parcels under CERCLA Section
120(h)(4).
See 0899
Minimizing Problems Caused by Staff Turn-
over (Superfund Management Review: Rec-
ommendation No. 43, M, N, O).
See 0105
Mobile Incineration: An Analysis of the In-
dustry.
See 1480
Mobile/Transportable Incineration Treat-
ment.
See 1481
Model Administrative Order on Consent for
Removal Actions.
See 0574
Model Litigation Report for CERCLA Sec-
tions 106 and 107 and RCRA Section 7003.
See 0576
Model Notice Letters.
See 0577
Model Statement of Work for a Remedial
Investigation and Feasibility Study Conduct-
ed by Potentially Responsible Parties.
See 0578
Model Unilateral Administrative Order for Re-
moval Response Activities.
See 0579
Model Unilateral Order for Remedial Design
and Remedial Action.
See 0580
Multi-Media Settlements of Enforcement
Claims.
See 0581
Multi-Media Settlements of Enforcement
Claims.
See 0582
NACEPT Committee Recommendations to
Administrator Browner.
See 0142
NACEPT Materials for Meeting Held on Sep-
tember 20-21, 1993.
See 0143
National Oil and Hazardous Substances Pol-
lution Contingency Plan (as Published in the
Federal Register, March 8, 1990).
See 0145
National Oil and Hazardous Substances Pol-
lution Contingency Plan (The NCP).
See 0146
National Priorities List Book Set.
See 0147
National Priorities List Sites: Alabama.
See 0148
National Priorities List Sites: Alabama.
See 0149
National Priorities List Sites: Alabama, 1992.
See 0150
National Priorities List Sites: Alaska.
See 0151
National Priorities List Sites: Alaska.
See 0152
National Priorities List Sites: Alaska, 1992.
See 0153
National Priorities List Sites: American
Samoa, Guam, and the Trust Territories.
See 0154
National Priorities List Sites: American
Samoa, Guam and Trust Territories.
See 0155
National Priorities List Sites: Arizona and
Nevada.
See 0156
National Priorities List Sites: Arizona and
Nevada.
See 0157
National Priorities List Sites: Arizona and
Nevada, 1992.
See 0158
National Priorities List Sites: Arkansas.
See 0159
National Priorities List Sites: Arkansas.
See 0160
National Priorities List Sites: Arkansas, 1992.
See 0161
National Priorities List Sites: California.
See 0162
National Priorities List Sites: California and
Hawaii.
See 0163
National Priorities List Sites: California and
Hawaii, 1992.
See 0164
National Priorities List Sites: Colorado.
See 0165
National Priorities List Sites: Colorado.
See 0166
National Priorities List Sites: Colorado, 1992.
See 0167
National Priorities List Sites: Connecticut.
See 0168
National Priorities List Sites: Connecticut.
See 0169
National Priorities List Sites: Connecticut,
1992.
See 0170
National Priorities List Sites: Delaware.
See 0171
National Priorities List Sites: Delaware.
See 0172
National Priorities List Sites: Delaware, 1992.
See 0173
National Priorities List Sites: Florida.
See 0174
National Priorities List Sites: Florida.
See 0175
National Priorities List Sites: Florida, 1992.
See 0176
National Priorities List Sites: Georgia.
See 0177
National Priorities List Sites: Georgia.
See 0178
National Priorities List Sites: Georgia, 1992.
See 0179
National Priorities List Sites: Hawaii.
See 0180
National Priorities List Sites: Idaho.
See 0181
National Priorities List Sites: Idaho.
See 0182
National Priorities List Sites: Idaho, 1992.
See 0183
I ' -,;
-------
SUBJECT INDEX
HAZARDOUS MATERIALS
National Priorities List Sites: Illinois.
See 0184
National Priorities List Sites: Illinois.
See 0185
National Priorities List Sites: Illinois, 1992
See 0186
National Priorities List Sites: Indiana
See 0187
National Priorities List Sites: Indiana.
See 0188
National Priorities List Sites: Indiana, 1992.
See 0189
National Priorities List Sites: Iowa.
See 0190
National Priorities List Sites: Iowa.
See 0191
National Priorities List Sites: Iowa, 1992.
See 0192
National Priorities List Sites: Kansas
See 0193
National Priorities List Sites: Kansas.
See 0194
National Priorities List Sites: Kansas, 1992.
See 0195
National Priorities List Sites: Kentucky.
See 0196
National Priorities List Sites: Kentucky.
See 0197
National Priorities List Sites: Kentucky 1992
See 0198
National Priorities List Sites: Louisiana.
See 0199
National Priorities List Sites: Louisiana.
See 0200
National Priorities List Sites: Louisiana, 1992
See 0201
National Priorities List Sites: Maine.
See 0202
National Priorities List Sites: Maine.
See 0203
National Priorities List Sites: Maine, 1992.
See 0204
National Priorities List Sites: Maryland.
See 0205
National Priorities List Sites: Maryland.
See 0206
National Priorities List Sites: Maryland, 1992.
See 0207
National Priorities List Sites: Massachusetts.
See 0208
National Priorities List Sites: Massachusetts.
See 0209
National Priorities List Sites: Massachusetts
1992.
See 0210
National Priorities List Sites: Michigan.
See 0211
National Priorities List Sites: Michigan.
See 0212
National Priorities List Sites: Michigan, 1992.
See 0213
National Priorities List Sites: Minnesota.
See 0214
National Priorities List Sites: Minnesota.
See 0215
National Priorities List Sites: Minnesota
1992.
See 0216
National Priorities List Sites: Mississippi.
See 0217
National Priorities List Sites: Mississippi.
See 0218
National Priorities List Sites: Mississippi,
1992.
See 0219
National Priorities List Sites: Missouri
See 0220
National Priorities List Sites: Missouri.
See 0221
National Priorities List Sites: Missouri, 1992
See 0222
National Priorities List Sites: Montana.
See 0223
National Priorities List Sites: Montana.
See 0224
National Priorities List Sites: Montana, 1992.
See 0225
National Priorities List Sites: Nebraska.
See 0226
National Priorities List Sites: Nebraska.
See 0227
National Priorities List Sites: Nebraska,
1992.
See 0228
National Priorities List Sites: New Hamp-
shire.
See 0229
National Priorities List Sites: New Hamp-
shire.
See 0230
National Priorities List Sites: New Hamp-
shire, 1992.
See 0231
National Priorities List Sites: New Jersey.
See 0232
National Priorities List Sites: New Jersey.
See 0233
National Priorities List Sites: New Jersey,
1992.
See 0234
National Priorities List Sites: New Mexico.
See 0235
National Priorities List Sites: New Mexico.
See 0236
National Priorities List Sites: New Mexico,
1992.
See 0237
National Priorities List Sites: New York.
See 0238
National Priorities List Sites: New York.
See 0239
National Priorities List Sites: New York,
1992.
See 0240
National Priorities List Sites: North and
South Dakota.
See 0241
National Priorities List Sites: North and
South Dakota, 1992.
See 0242
National Priorities List Sites: North Carolina.
See 0243
National Priorities List Sites: North Carolina.
See 0244
National Priorities List Sites: North Carolina,
1992.
See 0245
National Priorities List Sites: North Dakota
and South Dakota.
See 0246
National Priorities List Sites: Ohio.
See 0247
National Priorities List Sites: Ohio.
See 0248
National Priorities List Sites: Ohio, 1992.
See 0249
National Priorities List Sites: Oklahoma.
See 0250
National Priorities List Sites: Oklahoma.
See 0251
National Priorities List Sites: Oklahoma,
1992.
See 0252
National Priorities List Sites: Oregon.
See 0253
National Priorities List Sites: Oregon.
See 0254
National Priorities List Sites: Oregon, 1992.
See 0255
National Priorities List Sites: Pennsylvania.
See 0256
National Priorities List Sites: Pennsylvania.
See 0257
National Priorities List Sites: Pennsylvania,
1992.
See 0258
National Priorities List Sites: Puerto Rico.
See 0259
National Priorities List Sites: Puerto Rico.
See 0260
National Priorities List Sites: Puerto Rico and
Virgin Islands, 1992.
See 0261
National Priorities List Sites: Rhode Island.
See 0262
National Priorities List Sites: Rhode Island.
See 0263
National Priorities List Sites: Rhode Island,
1992.
See 0264
National Priorities List Sites Set (1991).
See 0265
National Priorities List Sites: South Carolina.
See 0266
National Priorities List Sites: South Carolina.
See 0267
National Priorities List Sites: South Carolina,
1992.
See 0268
National Priorities List Sites: Tennessee.
See 0269
National Priorities List Sites: Tennessee.
See 0270
National Priorities List Sites: Tennessee,
1992.
See 0271
National Priorities List Sites: Texas.
See 0272
National Priorities List Sites: Texas.
See 0273
National Priorities List Sites: Texas, 1992.
See 0274
National Priorities List Sites: The United
States Territories, 1992.
See 0275
National Priorities List Sites: Utah.
See 0276
National Priorities List Sites: Utah.
See 0277
National Priorities List Sites: Utah, 1992.
See 0278
National Priorities List Sites: Vermont.
See 0279
National Priorities List Sites: Vermont.
See 0280
National Priorities List Sites: Vermont, 1992.
See 0281
National Priorities List Sites: Virginia.
See 0282
National Priorities List Sites: Virginia.
See 0283
National Priorities List Sites: Virginia, 1992.
See 0284
National Priorities List Sites: Washington.
See 0285
National Priorities List Sites: Washington.
See 0286
National Priorities List Sites: Washington,
1992.
See 0287
National Priorities List Sites: West Virginia.
See 0288
National Priorities List Sites: West Virginia.
See 0289
National Priorities List Sites: West Virginia,
1992.
See 0290
National Priorities List Sites: Wisconsin.
See 0291
SU-31
-------
HAZARDOUS MATERIALS
SUBJECT INDEX
National Priorities List Sites: Wisconsin.
See 0292
National Priorities Ust Sites: Wisconsin,
J0293
National Priorities List Sites: Wyoming.
See 0294
National Priorities Ust Sftes: Wyoming.
See 0295
National Priorities Ust Sites: Wyoming, 1992.
See 0296
National Superfund Program Priorities, Fiscal
Year 1994.
See 0298
Nature and Extent of Ecological Risks at Su-
porfund Sites and "RCRA (Resource Conser-
vation and Recovery Act) Facilities (Execu-
' tiva Summary Included).
See 1060
Nowf Policy on Performance of Risk Assess-
(' merits during Remedial Investigation Feas-
ibility Studies (RI/FS) Conducted by Poten-
tially Responsible Parties (PRPs).
See 1061
Notification of Hazardous Substance Sites
(Section 103{c)).
Sea 1147
Notification of Hazardous Waste Sites Re-
quired Under Section 103(c) of the Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compen-
sation and Liability Act (CERCLA) of 1980:
EPA Region 1.
See 1174
: Notification of Hazardous Waste Sites Re-
quired Under Section 103(o) of the Compre-
ss hensfva Environmental Response, Compen-
sation and Uability Act (CERCLA) of 1980:
EPA Region 2.
See 1175
Notification of Hazardous Waste Sites Re-
quired Under Section 103(c) of the Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compen-
;:: satfon and Uability Act (CERCLA) of 1980:
EPA Rogton3.
See 1176
:• Notification of Hazardous Waste Sites Re-
quired Under Section 103(c) of the Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compen-
sation and Uability Act (CERCLA) of 1980:
EPA Region 4.
Se« 1177
Notification of Hazardous Waste Sites Re-
quired Under Section 103(c) of the Compre-
ii, hor.stvo Environmental Response, Compen-
sation and Uablty Act (CERCLA) of 1980:
EPA Region 5,
Sea 1178
Notification of Hazardous Waste Sites Re-
quired Under Section 103(c) of the Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compen-
sation and Liability Act (CERCLA) of 1980:
..... EPA Region 6.
See 1179
...... Notification of Hazardous Waste Sites Re-
quired Under Section 103(c) of the Compre-
...... hensfye Environmental Response, Compen-
" Sattori and Uablty AH (CERCLA) of 1980:
EPA Region 7.
See 1180
: Notification of Hazardous Waste Sites Re-
quired Under Section 103(c) of the Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compen-
sation and Liability Act (CERCLA) of 1980:
EPA Region 8.
Sea 1181
Notification of Hazardous Waste Sites Re-
quired Under SecUon 103(c) of the Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compen-
sation and Uability Act (CERCLA) of 1980:
EPA Region 9.
See 1182
Notification of Hazardous Waste Sites Re-
quired Under Section 103(c) of the Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compen-
sation and Uability Act (CERCLA) of 1980:
EPA Region 10.
See 1183
Notification Requirements for Continuous
Releases of Hazardous Substances.
See 1148
NPL Characterization Project: National Re-
sults.
See 0355
NPL Characterization Project: Region 1 Re-
sults.
See 0356
NPL Characterization Project: Region 3 Re-
sults.
See 0357
NPL Characterization Project: Region 4 Re-
sults.
See 0358
NPL Characterization Project: Region 5 Re-
sults.
See 0359
NPL Characterization Project: Region 6 Re-
sults.
See 0360
NPL Characterization Project: Region 7 Re-
sults.
See 0361
NPL Characterization Project: Region 8 Re-
sults.
See 0362
NPL Characterization Project: Region 9 Re-
sults.
See 0363
NPL Characterization Project: Region 10 Re-
sults.
See 0364
NPL Construction Completion Definition at
Bioremediation and Soil Vapor Extraction
Sites.
See 0365
Obtaining a Soil and Debris Treatability Vari-
ance for Removal Actions. Superfund LDR
Guide No. 6B.
See 0430
OERR Organizational Conflict of Interest
Review and Approval Program (Superfund
Management Review: Recommendation No.
46C).
See 0046
Off-Site Policy: RFA or Equivalent Investiga-
tion Requirement at RCRA Treatment and
Storage Facilities.
See 0431
Operations and Research at the U.S. EPA
Incineration Research Facility: Annual
Report for FY89.
See 1482
Operations and Research at the U.S. EPA
Incineration Research Facility: Annual
Report for FY90.
See 1483
Operations and Research at the U.S. EPA
Incineration Research Facility: Annual
Report for FY91.
See 1484
Operations and Research at the U.S. EPA
Incineration Research Facility: Annual
Report for FY92.
See 1485
OSWER Integrated Health and Safety Stand-
ard Operating Practices.
See 0921
OSWER Source Book: Training and Tech-
nology Transfer Resources.
See 1283
OSWER Source Book. Volume 1. Training
and Technology Transfer Resources, 1992-
1993.
See 1284
I! ' ,: : "
OSWER1 Source Book. Volume 2. Training
and Technology Transfer Resources, 1992-
1993.
See 1285
Overview of ERNS: Emergency Response
Notification System (ERNS) Fact Sheet.
See 0935
Overview of Selected EPA (Environmental
Protection Agency) Regulations and Guid-
ance Affecting POTW (Publicly Owned
Treatment Works) Management.
See 0432
Overview of the Off-Site Policy for OSCs and
RPMs.
See 0433
Overview of the Outyear Liability Model
(OLM).
See 0106
PA Review Checklist.
See 0366
PA-Score (Preliminary Assessment Score)
User's Manual and Tutorial. Version 2.1.
See 0367
PA-Score (Preliminary Assessment Score),
Version 1.0 (for Microcomputers).
See 0368
PA-Score (Preliminary Assessment Score),
Version 2.1, 3 1/2 inch (for Microcomput-
ers).
See 0369
PA-Score (Preliminary Assessment Score),
Version 2.1, 5 1/4 inch (for Microcomput-
ers).
See 0370
PA-Score Software, Version 1.0. Users
Manual and Tutorial.
See 0371
Performance of Risk Assessments in Reme-
dial Investigation/Feasibility Studies (Rl/
FSs) Conducted by Potentially Responsible
Parties (PRPs).
See 1102
Performance Tracking under ARCS Con-
tracts.
See 0061
Permits and Permit 'Equivalency' Processes
for CERCLA On-Site Response Actions.
See 0435
Personal Air Sampling and Air Monitoring
Requirements under 29 CFR 1910.120.
See 0922
Physical/Chemical Treatment of Hazardous
Waste Sites: Speaker Slide Copies and Sup-
porting Information.
See 1287
Pilot-Scale Demonstration of a Slurry-Phase
Biological Reactor for Creosote-Contaminat-
ed Soil. Applications Analysis Report.
See 1426
Pilot-Scale Incineration of Comtaminated
Soils from the Drake Chemical Superfund
Site.
See 1522
Pilot-Scale Incineration of Contaminated Soil
from the Purity Oil Sales and McColl Super-
fund Sites.
See 1290
Pilot-Scale Incineration of PCB-Contaminat-
ed Sediments from the New Bedford Harbor
Hot Spot Superfund Site.
See 1292
Policy for Enforcement Actions against
Transporters under CERCLA.
See 0584
Policy for Superfund Compliance with the
RCRA Land Disposal Restrictions.
See 0436
SU-32
-------
SUBJECT INDEX
HAZARDOUS MATERIALS
Policy on Rpodplains and Wetland Assess-
ments for CERCLA Actions.
See 0437
Policy on Management of Post-Removal Site
Control.
See 1008
Policy on Recovering Indirect Cost in
CERCLA Section 107 Cost Recovery Ac-
tions.
See 0585
Policy Towards Owners of Residential Prop-
erty at Superfund Sites.
See 0586
Policy Towards Owners of Residential Prop-
erty at Superfund Sites.
See 0587
Political Subdivision Involvement in Super-
fund.
See 0479
Political Subdivision Involvement in Super-
fund.
See 0480
Potential for Joint Research between EPA
and the U.S. Army.
See 1293
Potential Sources of Error in Ground-Water
Sampling at Hazardous Waste Sites. Ground
Water Issue.
See 1472
Preliminary Ranking Evaluation Score
(PREscore) Version 1.1 (for Microcomput-
ers). ,
See 0372
Preparation of Hazardous Waste Referrals.
See 0588
PREscore Software. Users Manual and Tuto-
rial. Version 1.0.
See 0374
PREscore Software: Users Manual and Tuto-
rial Version 2.0.
See 0375
Presentations EPA-State Soil Standards
Conference. Held in Crystal City, Virginia on
January 29, 1991.
See 1524
Priority for Health and Safety Requirements,
Especially Medical Surveillance Require-
ments, for EPA Employees Who Support
OSWER Programs.
See 0923
Procedural Guidance on Treatment of Insur-
ers under CERCLA.
See 0589
Procedures for Documenting Costs for
CERCLA Section 107 Actions.
See 0590
Procedures for Transmittal of CERCLA and
RCRA Civil Judicial Enforcement Case Pack-
ages to Headquarters.
See 0591
Procuring Innovative Technologies at Reme-
dial Sites: Q's and A's and Case Studies.
See 1132
Progress Toward Implementing Superfund.
Fiscal Year 1988.
See 0299
Progress Toward Implementing Superfund.
Fiscal Year 1989.
See 0300
Progress Toward Implementing Superfund,
Fiscal Year 1990: A Report to the Congress.
See 0301
Progress Toward Implementing Superfund,
Fiscal Year 1991. Report to Congress.
See 0302
Proposed Method to Evaluate the Effective-
ness of Community Involvement in Super-
fund (Superfund Management Review: Rec-
ommendation Number 43.A).
See 0109
Prospects for In situ Chemical Treatment for
Contaminated Soil.
'See 1525
PRP Search Supplemental Guidance for
Sites in the Superfund Remedial Program.
See 0592
Public Awareness Signs at Superfund Sites.
See 0481
Quality and Environmental Protection: The
EPA QA Program.
See 0990
Quality Assurance for Superfund Environ-
mental Data Collection Activities.
See 0991
Quality Assurance/Quality Control Guidance
for Removal Activities: Sampling QA/QC
Plan and Data Validation Procedures.
See 0993
Quantifying Effects in Ecological Site As-
sessments: Biological and Statistical Consid-
erations.
See 1063
RCRA, Superfund Monthly Hot Line Reports.
See 0303
Real Estate Acquisition Procedures for
USAGE Projects.
See 1133
Reassignment of CLP Transportation Func-
tions.
See 0063
Recent Advances in Risk Reduction Engi-
neering.
See 1064
Regional Guide: Issuing Site-Specific Treat-
ability Variances for Contaminated Soils and
Debris from Land Disposal Restrictions
(LDRs).
See 1528
Regional Oversight of Federal Facility Clean-
ups under CERCLA.
See 0900
Regional Pilot Projects and Initiatives.
See 0064
Regional Pilots and Applications of Super-
fund Accelerated Cleanup Model (SACM).
See 0110
Regional Quality Control Guidance for NPL
Candidate Sites.
See 0376
Releasing Identities of Potentially Responsi-
ble Parties in Response to FOIA Requests.
See 0594
Releasing Information to Potentially Respon-
sible Parties at CERCLA Sites.
See 0595
Remedial Action Report Documentation for
Operable Unit Completion.
See 1134
Remedial Action, Treatment, and Disposal of
Hazardous Waste. Proceedings of the
Annual Hazardous Waste Research Sympo-
sium (17th). Held in Cincinnati, Ohio on April
9-11,1991.
See 1135
Remedial Investigation: Site Characterization
and Treatability Studies.
See 1106
Removal Cost Management System: Version
3.2.
See 1009
Removal Program Representative Sampling
Guidance. Volume 1. Soil.
See 1010
Reporting and Exchange of Information on
State Enforcement Actions at National Prior-
ities List Sites.
See 0483
Reporting Requirements for Continuous Re-
leases of Hazardous Substances: A Guide
for Facilities and Vessels on Compliance.
See 1150
Alternating Current Electrocoagulation for
Superfund Site Remediation.
See 1192
Application of Tradescantia Micronucleus
Assay for In situ Evaluation of Potential Ge-
netic Hazards from Exposure to Chemicals
at a Wood-Preserving Site.
See 1195
Bipdegradation of Creosote and Pentachlor-
ophenol in Contaminated Groundwater:
Chemical and Biological Assessment.
See 1432
Comparison of Organic Emissions from Haz-
ardous Waste Incinerators versus the 1990
Toxic Release Inventory Air Releases.
See 1397
Comparison: Organic Emissions from Haz-
ardous Waste Incinerators versus the 1990
Toxics Release Inventory Air Releases.
See 1217
Control Technologies for Remediation of
Contaminated Soil and Waste Deposits at
Superfund Lead Batten/ Recycling Sites.
See 1221
Control Technology: Estimating Innovative
Technology Costs for the SITE Program.
See 1222
Control Technology: 1992 Update of U.S.
EPA's Superfund Innovative Technology
Evaluation (SITE) Emerging Technology Pro-
gram.
See 1223
Cost Estimating Systems for Remedial
Action Projects.
See 1123 .
Demonstration of Hazardous Waste Site
Treatment Technologies.
See 1227
Demonstration Projects Under the U.S. EPA
Superfund Innovative Technology Evaluation
Program.
See 1230
Description of EPA SITE Demonstration of
the HAZCON Stabilization Process at the
Douglassville, Pennsylvania Superfund Site.
See 1552
EPA SITE Demonstration of the International
Waste Technologies/Geo-Con In situ Stabili-
zation/Solidification Process.
See 1553
Factors,Affecting the Applicability of Plasma
Systems to the Cleanup of Superfund Sites.
See 1250
Field Evaluation of the UV/Oxidation Tech-
nology to Treat Contaminated Groundwater.
Proceedings of the National Conference
(10th). Held in Washington, DC. on Novem-
ber 27-29, 1989.
See 1453
Filtration of Ground Water Samples for
Metals Analysis.
See 1454
Long-Path FTIR Measurements of Volatile
Organic Compounds in an Industrial Setting
(July 1989-April 1991).
See 1413
PAST: The Potential ARARs Selection Tool.
See 0434
Personnel Protection through Reconnais-
sance Robotics at Superfund Remedial
Sites.
See 1286
Potential Surrogate Metals for Incinerator
Trial Burns.
See 1486
Quality Assurance for the SITE (Superfund
Innovative Technology Evaluation) Program
Demonstrations.
See 0992
SU-33
-------
HAZARDOUS MATERIALS
SUBJECT INDEX
Removal of Creosote from Soil by Thermal
Desorptkxi.
S4H1S30
Results from the Stabilization Technologies
Evaluated by the Site Program. New Eng-
land Environmental Expo 90.
S*e 1558
SITE Demonstration of the CHEMFIX Solidi-
fication/Stabilization Process at the Portable
Equipment Salvage Company Site.
S««1559
'Smalt Systems Meet Superfund Challenge
Wtth Point-of-Entry Treatment Units.
Sea 1304
SoUdificaOon/Stabifization: Is It Always Ap-
propriate.
Sea 1560
Use of Electrokinetics for Hazardous Waste
Site Remediation.
See 1366
Resources Conservation Company B.E.S.T.
i (Trade Name) Solvent Extraction Technolo-
gy: Application Analysis Report.
;jBee.1294 ........ ..................
.Resources for Preparing Independent Gov-
ernment Estimates for Remedial Contracting
« Work Assignments
Sea 0066
Response Action Contractor Final Indemnifi-
cation Guidelines. Volume Z, Number 1,
Ma«h 1993.
S«e0067
Retech, Inc., Plasma Centrifugal Furnace:
Applications Analysis Report.
Review and Evaluation of Area Source Dis-
persion Algorithms for Emission Sources at
Suportund Sites.
See 1416
: Revised EPA Guidance on Parallel Proceed-
ings,
See 0597
Revised Hazard Ranking System: An Im-
: proved Tool for Screening Superfund Sites.
See 0377
Jftevjaad Hazard, Ranking System: Back-
ground Information.
See 037S
Revised Hazard Ranking System: Evaluating
'"Sftes After Waste "Removals.
See 0379
! Revised Hazard Ranking System (HRS):
RnalRule.
Sea 0380
Revised Hazard Ranking System: Qs and
As. .......
Soe 0381
Revised Hazardous Waste Bankruptcy Guid-
ance,
See 0598
Revised Hazardous Waste Bankruptcy Guid-
ance, October 7, 1991.
See 0599
Revised Procedures for Implementing Off-
Site Response Actions.
Sea 0601
Revision of Policy Regarding Superfund
Project Assignment between Alternative Re-
medial Contracting Strategy Contractors and
the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers.
See 0068
: '...Revisions to OMB Circular A-94 on Guide-
j ,"|nos and Discount Rates for Benefit-Cost
• Analysis.
&HS1107
Revisions to the Interim Guidance on PRP
Participation in Remedial Investigations and
;• feasibility Studies.
Seo0603
;;::; RI/FS improvements Follow-Up.
Sea 1109
RI/FS Streamlining.
See 1110
Risk Assessment Guidance for Superfund.
Volume 1. Human Health Evaluation Manual.
Part A, April 1990.
See 1066
Risk Assessment Guidance for Superfund.
Volume 1. Human Health Evaluation Manual
(Part B).
See 1067
Risk Assessment Guidance for Superfund.
Volume 1. Human Health Evaluation Manual
(Part B, Development of Risk-Based Prelimi-
nary Remediation Goals).
See 1068
Risk Assessment Guidance for Superfund.
Volume 1. Human Health Evaluation Manual
(Part C).
See 1069
Risk Assessment Guidance for Superfund.
Volume 1. Human Health Evaluation Manual
(Part C, Risk Evaluation of Remedial Alterna-
tives).
See 1070
Risk Assessment Guidance for Superfund.
Volume 1. Human Health Evaluation Manual.
Supplemental Guidance: 'Standard Default
Exposure Factors'.
See 1071
Risk Assessment in Superfund: A Primer.
First Edition, September 1990.
See 1073
Risk Reduction Engineering Laboratory Site
Remediation Technical Support Program:
FY92 Annual Report.
See 1296
ROD Annual Report, FY 1989.
See 1111
ROD Annual Report, FY 1990.
See 1112
ROD Annual Report, FY1991. Volume 1.
See 1113
ROD Annual Report, FY1991. Volume 2.
See 1114
ROD Annual Report, FY 1992.
See 1115
Role of Community Interviews in the Devel-
opment of a Community Relations Program
for Remedial Response.
See 0485
Role of Expedited Response Actions under
SARA.
See 1116
Role of the Baseline Risk Assessment in
Superfund Remedy Selection Decisions.
See 1075
Roles and Responsibilities of Deputy Project
Officers and Work Assignment Managers
under the Technical Enforcement Support
(TES) Contracts.
See 0069
Roles and Responsibilities of Regional
Project Officers, Zone Project Officers, Work
Assignment Managers and Contracting Offi-
cers for the RCRA Enforcement, Permitting
and Assistance Contracts (REPA).
See 0070
Roles and Responsibilities of Regional
Project Officers and Headquarters Zone
Project Officers for Management of TES
(TES 5) Contracts.
See 0604
Scope of the CERCLA Petroleum Exclusion
under Sections 101 (14) and 104(a)(2).
See 0605
Site Assessment: Evaluating Risks at Super-
fund Sites.
See 1076
Site Classification Changes from Enforce-
ment to Fund Lead.
See 0606
SITE Emerging Technologies Project: Bab-
cock and Wilcox Cyclone Vitrification.
See 1303
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
Frequency by Party Name Report.
See 0607
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
Frequency by Party Name Report.
See 0608
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
Frequency by Party Name Report.
See 0609
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
Frequency by PRP Name Report, September
26, 1991.
See 0610
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)
(National).
See 0611
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
National Alphabetical Report by PRP Name,
September 26,1991.
See 0612
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)
(National) (for Microcomputers).
See 0613
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
National Frequency by PRP Name Report.
See 0614
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
National PRP Listing Alphabetically by PRP
Name.
See 0615
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
National PRP Listing Alphabetically by PRP
Name.
See 0616
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
National PRP Listing by Site.
See 0617
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
National PRP Listing by Site.
See 0618
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
National PRP Report by Site, September 26,
1991.
See 0619
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)
(National - 3 1/2 Inch Diskette, IBM PS/2
Compatible) (for Microcomputers).
See 0620
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Alabama.
See 0621
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Alabama.
See 0622
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Alabama.
See 0623
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for American Samoa.
See 0624
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for American Samoa.
See 0625
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for American Samoa.
See 0626
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Arizona.
See 0627
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Arizona.
See 0628
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Arizona.
See 0629
SU-34
•-I -
-------
SUBJECT INDEX
HAZARDOUS MATERIALS
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Arkansas.
See 0630
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Arkansas.
See 0631
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Arkansas.
See 0632
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for California.
See 0633
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for California.
See 0634
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for California.
See 0635
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Colorado.
See 0636
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Colorado.
See 0637
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Colorado.
See 0638
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Connecticut.
See 0639
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Connecticut.
See 0640
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Connecticut.
See 0641
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Delaware.
See 0642
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Delaware.
See 0643
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Delaware.
See 0644
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Florida.
See 0645
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Florida.
See 0646
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Florida.
See 0647
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Georgia.
See 0648
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Georgia.
See 0649
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Georgia.
See 0650
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Idaho.
See 0651
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Idaho.
See 0652
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Idaho.
See 0653
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Illinois.
See 0654
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Illinois.
See 0655
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Illinois.
See 0656
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Indiana.
See 0657
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Indiana.
See 0658
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Indiana.
See 0659
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Iowa.
See 0660
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Iowa.
See 0661
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Iowa.
See 0662
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Kansas.
See 0663
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Kansas.
See 0664
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Kansas.
See 0665
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Kentucky.
See 0666
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Kentucky.
See 0667
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Kentucky.
See 0668
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Louisiana.
See 0669
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Louisiana.
See 0670
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Louisiana.
See 0671
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Maine.
See 0672
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Maine.
See 0673
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Maine.
See 0674
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Maryland.
See 0675
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Maryland.
See 0676
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Maryland.
See 0677
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Massachusetts.
See 0678
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Massachusetts.
See 0679
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Massachusetts.
See 0680
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Michigan.
See 0681
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Michigan.
See 0682
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Michigan.
See 0683
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Minnesota.
See 0684
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Minnesota.
See 0685
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Minnesota.
See 0686
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Mississippi.
See 0687
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Mississippi.
See 0688
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Mississippi.
See 0689
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Missouri.
See 0690
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Missouri.
See 0691
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Missouri.
See 0692
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Montana.
See 0693
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Montana.
See 0694
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Montana.
See 0695
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Nebraska.
See 0696
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Nebraska.
See 0697
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Nebraska.
See 0698
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Nevada.
See 0699
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Nevada.
See 0700
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Nevada.
See 0701
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for New Hampshire.
See 0702
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for New Hampshire.
See 0703
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for New Hampshire.
See 0704
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for New Jersey.
See 0705
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for New Jersey.
See 0706
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for New Jersey.
See 0707
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for New Mexico.
See 0708
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for New Mexico.
See 0709
SU-35
-------
HAZARDOUS MATERIALS
SUBJECT INDEX
"Sfte Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP listing by Site for New Mexico.
Sea 0710
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for New York.
Sea 0711
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for New York.
Sea 0712
Site Enforcemont tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for New York.
Sea 0713
Stte Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for North Carolina.
S<30 0714
SKa Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for North Carolina.
Sea 0715
Slta Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for North Carolina.
Sea 0716
.Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for North Dakota.
,§« 0717
:SJta Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Usttng by Site for North Dakota.
Sea 0718
Stta Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
RRP Listing by Site for North Dakota.
See 0719
;Slte Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Northern Marianas.
Sea 0720
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by SJta for Northern Marianas.
Sea 0721
Stta Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Northern Marianas.
Sea 0722
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Ohio.
Soe 0723
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing fay Site for Ohio.
Sea 0724
§lte Enforcement tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Ohio.
Sea 0725
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Oklahoma.
See 0726
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Usttng by Site for Oklahoma.
Sea 0727
Site Enforcement Jrackjng System (SETS):
IPflP Listing by Site for Oklahoma.
See 0728
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Oregon.
::See 07,29
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Oregon.
See 0730
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Oregon.
See 0731
Sfta Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Pennsylvania.
See 0732
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Pennsylvania.
See 0733
Stte Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Pennsylvania.
See 0734
Stte Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Puerto Rico.
See 0735
Stte Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Puerto Rico.
Sea 0736
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Puerto Rico.
See 0737
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 1.
See 0738
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 1.
See 0739
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 1, January
22, 1992.
See 0741
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 1. Volume 1.
See 0742
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 2.
See 0743
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 2.
See 0744
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 2, January
22, 1992.
See 0746
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 2. Volume 2.
See 0747
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 3.
See 0748
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 3, January
22,1992.
See 0750
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 3. Volume 3.
See 0751
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 4.
See 0752
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 4.
See 0753
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 4, January
22, 1992.
See 0755
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 4. Volume 4.
See 0756
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 5.
See 0757
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 5.
See 0758
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 5, January
22, 1992.
See 0760
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 5. Volume 5.
See 0761
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 6.
See 0762
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 6.
See 0763
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 6, January
22, 1992.
See 0765
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 6. Volume 6.
See 0766
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 7.
See 0767
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 7.
See 0768
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 7, January
22,1992.
See 0770
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 7. Volume 7.
See 0771
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 8.
See 0772
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 8.
See 0773
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 8, January
22, 1992.
See 0775
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 8. Volume 8.
See 0776
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 9.
See 0777
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 9.
See 0778
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 9, January
22, 1992.
See 0780
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 9. Volume 9.
See 0781
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 10.
See 0782
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 10.
See 0783
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 10, January
22, 1992.
See 0785
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 10. Volume
10.
See 0786
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Rhode Island.
See 0787
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Rhode Island.
See 0783
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Rhode Island.
See 0789
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for South Carolina.
See 0790
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for South Carolina.
See 0791
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for South Carolina.
See 0792
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for South Dakota.
See 0793
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for South Dakota.
See 0794
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for South Dakota.
See 0795
SU-36
.:::: 'I:,
-------
SUBJECT INDEX
HAZARDOUS MATERIALS
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Tennessee.
See 0796
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Tennessee.
See 0797
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Tennessee.
See 0798
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Texas.
See 0799
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Texas.
See 0800
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Texas.
See 0801
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Trust Territories.
See 0802
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Trust Territories.
See 0803
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Trust Territories.
See 0804
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Utah.
See 0805
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Utah.
See 0806
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Utah.
See 0807
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Vermont.
See 0808
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Vermont.
See 0809
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Vermont.
See 0810
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Virginia.
See 0811
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Virginia.
See 0812
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Washington.
See 0813
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Washington.
See 0814
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Washington.
See 0815
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for West Virginia.
See 0816
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for West Virginia.
See 0817
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for West Virginia.
See 0818
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Wisconsin.
See 0819
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Wisconsin.
See 0820
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Wisconsin.
See 0821
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Wyoming.
See 0822
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Wyoming.
See 0823
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Wyoming.
See 0824
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP National Frequency by Party Name,
January 22,1992.
See 0825
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP National Listing Alphabetically by Party
Name.
See 0826
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP National Listing Alphabetically by Party
Name.
See 0827
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP National Listing Alphabetically by Party
Name.
See 0828
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP National Listing Alphabetically by Party
Name.
See 0829
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP National Listing Alphabetically by Party
Name.
See 0830
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP National Listing Alphabetically by Party
Name, January 22,1992.
See 0831
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP National Listing by Site.
See 0832
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP National Listing by Site.
See 0833
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP National Listing by Site.
See 0834
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP National Listing by Site.
See 0835
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP National Listing by Site, January 22,
1992.
See 0837
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Report by Site for Region 1, September
26,1991.
See 0838
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Report by Site for Region 2, September
26,1991.
See 0839
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Report by Site for Region 3, September
26, 1991.
See 0840
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Report by Site for Region 4, September
26,1991.
See 0841
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Report by Site for Region 5, September
26, 1991.
See 0842
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Report by Site for Region 6, September
26,1991.
See 0843
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Report by Site for Region 7, September
26, 1991.
See 0844
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Report by Site for Region 8, September
26, 1991.
See 0845
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Report by Site for Region 9, September
26, 1991.
See 0846
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Report by Site for Region 10, Septem-
ber 26, 1991.
See 0847
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Site Listing by Site for Virginia.
See 0848
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)
(Region 1 -.3 1/2 Inch Diskette IBM PS/2
Compatible) (for Microcomputers).
See 0849
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)
(Region 1) (for Microcomputers).
See 0850
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)
(Region 2-31/2 Inch Diskette IBM PS/2
Compatible) (for Microcomputers).
See 0851
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)
(Region 2) (for Microcomputers).
See 0852
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)
(Region 3-3 1/2 Inch Diskette IBM PS/2
Compatible) (for Microcomputers).
See 0853
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)
(Region 3) (for Microcomputers).
See 0854
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)
(Region 4-31/2 Inch Diskette IBM PS/2
Compatible) (for Microcomputers).
See 0855
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)
(Region 4) (for Microcomputers).
See 0856
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)
(Region 5-31/2 Inch Diskette IBM PS/2
Compatible) (for Microcomputers).
See 0857
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)
(Region 5) (for Microcomputers).
See 0858
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)
(Region 6-31/2 Inch Diskette IBM PS/2
Compatible) (for Microcomputers).
See 0859
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)
(Region 6) (for Microcomputers).
See 0860
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)
(Region 7-31/2 Inch Diskette IBM PS/2
Compatible) (for Microcomputers).
See 0861
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)
(Region 7) (for Microcomputers).
See 0862
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)
(Region 8-31/2 Inch Diskette IBM PS/2
Compatible) (for Microcomputers).
See 0863
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)
(Region 8) (for Microcomputers).
See 0864
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)
(Region 9-31/2 Inch Diskette IBM PS/2
Compatible) (for Microcomputers).
See 0865
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)
(Region 9) (for Microcomputers).
See 0866
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)
(Region 10 - 3 1/2 Inch Diskette IBM PS/2
Compatible) (for Microcomputers).
See 0867
SU-37
-------
HAZARDOUS MATERIALS
SUBJECT INDEX
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)
(Rogten 10) ((or Microcomputers).
Sea 0868
Site-Specific Contracting for Removals.
S091011
Slurry Btodegradatlon.
S<301428
Small Cost Recovery Referrals.
See 0869
Smart Moves In Superfund - Regional Initia-
tives, Volume 1, Number 1, February 1992.
Soo0305
Smart Moves in Superfund - Regional Pilots
* and Initiatives. Volume 1, Number 2, Sep-
tember 1992.
See 0306
Smart Moves hi Superfund - Revitalization
One Year Later. Volume 1, Number 3, Janu-
ary 1993.
See 0307
; SoWiflcatlon/Stabpizatipn of Organics and
Inorganics.
Seo 1561
''Solvent Extraction Treatment
Seo 1306
', Some Major Factors Important in Establish-
ing Land lisa Policy for Remediated Super-
fund Sites.
See 0308
'Standard Document for Remedial Site As-
sessment Decisions.
Seo 0392
Standard Operating Safety Guides.
See 0924
Standard Operating Safety Guides.
Seo 0925
Status of Regional Superfund Pilots: End-of-
Year Report.
S4W0309
StremmBnod Approach for Settlements with
Da Mirimis Waste Contributors under
CERCLA Section 122(g)(1)(A).
Seo 0870
Streamlining the RI/FS for CERCLA Munici-
pal Landfill Sites.
See 1118
Structure and Components of Five-Year Re-
views.
Sea 1120
Structure and Components of Five-Year Re-
views.
Soo1121
Submittal of Ten-Point Settlement Analyses
for CERCLA Consent Decrees.
Soe0871
Subsurface Contamination Reference Guide.
See 1474
Suggested ROD Language for Various
Ground Water Remediation Options.
See 1475
Summary of Ecological Risks, Assessment
: Methods, and Risk Management Decisions
hi Superfund and RCRA (Resource Conser-
vation and Recovery Act).
See 1077
Summary of 'Guidance of Landowner Liabil-
ity under Section 107(a)1 of CERCLA, De
Mlnimte Settlements under Section
122(gX1)(b) of CERCLA, and Settlements
• with Prospective Purchasers of Contaminat-
ed Property'.
Sea 0672
Summary of 'Guidance on CERCLA Section
106
-------
SUBJECT INDEX
HAZARDOUS MATERIALS
Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Glean-
up Efforts Nationwide, Summer 1993 (Fike/
Artel Chemical Site Profile, Nitro, West Vir-
ginia).
See 0967
Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Clean-
up Efforts Nationwide, Summer 1993 (North-
side Landfill Site Profile, Spokane, Washing-
ton).
See 0968
Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Clean-
up Efforts Nationwide, Summer 1993 (Tri-
State Plating Site Profile, Columbus, Indi-
ana).
See 0970
Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Clean-
up Efforts Nationwide (White Chemical).
See 0971
Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Clean-
up Efforts Nationwide, Winter 1993. (Wells G
and H Site, Woburn, Massachusetts).
See 0972
Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Clean-
up Efforts Nationwide, Winter 1994 (Bailey
Waste Disposal Site Profile, Texas).
See 0973
Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Clean-
up Efforts Nationwide, Winter 1994 (New
Brighton Site Profile, Minneapolis/St. Paul,
Minnesota).
See 0974
Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Clean-
up Efforts Nationwide, Winter 1994 (Sey-
mour Recycling Site Profile, Seymour, Indi-
ana).
See 0975
Superfund Contracts Management Issues.
See 0072
Superfund Cost Recovery Strategy.
See 0882
Superfund Desk Reference for Municipali-
ties.
See 0486
Superfund Docket Operations Manual for
Rulemaking Activities.
See 0081
Superfund Emergency Response Actions: A
Summary of Federally-Funded Removals.
Fifth Annual Report - Fiscal Year 1990.
See 0313
Superfund Emergency Response Actions: A
Summary of Federally Funded Removals.
Fourth Annual Report - Fiscal Year 1989
See 0314
Superfund Emergency Response Actions: A
Summary of Federally-Funded Removals.
Sixth Annual Report, Fiscal Year 1991.
See 0315
Superfund Emergency Response Actions: A
Summary of Federally-Funded Removals.
Volume 1.
See 0316
Superfund Emergency Response Actions: A
Summary of Federally-Funded Removals.
Volume 2.
See 0317
Superfund Emergency Response Actions: A
Summary of Federally Funded Removals.
Volume 3.
See 0318
Superfund Enforcement Strategy and Imple-
mentation Plan.
See 0883
Superfund Engineering Issue: Issues Affect-
ing the Applicability and Success of Remedi-
al/Removal Incineration Projects.
See 1308
Superfund Engineering Issue: Treatment of
Lead-Contaminated Soils.
See 1535
Superfund: EPA/ICMA Superfund Revitaliza-
tion Conference. Held in Chicago, Illinois on
November 12-13, 1992.
See 0319
Superfund: EPA/ICMA Superfund Revitaliza-
tion Conference. Held in San Francisco,
California on February 1-2, 1993.
See 0320
Superfund Fact Sheet: An Overview.
See 0487
Superfund Fact Sheet: Benzene.
See 0489
Superfund Fact Sheet: Community Inter-
views.
See 0490
Superfund Fact Sheet: Exposure Pathways.
See 0393
Superfund Fact Sheet: Identifying Sites.
See 0491
Superfund Fact Sheet: PCBs.
See 0492
Superfund Fact Sheet Public Involvement.
See 0493
Superfund Fact Sheet: The Remedial Pro-
gram.
See 0494
Superfund Fact Sheet: The Removal Pro-
gram.
See 0495
Superfund Fact Sheet: Trichloroethylene.
See 0496
SUPERFUND: Focusing on the Nation at
Large. A Decade of Progress at National
Priorities List Sites.
See 0321
Superfund: Focusing on the Nation at Large.
A Decade of Progress at National Priorities
List Sites.
See 0322
Superfund: Focusing on the Nation at Large.
1991 Update.
See 0323
Superfund Ground Water Issue. Contaminant
Transport in Fractured Media: Models for
Decision Makers.
See 1477
Superfund Guide: Clean Air Act Hazardous
Air Pollutants Added to the List of CERCLA
Hazardous Substances.
See 1151
Superfund Guide: Reportable Quantity Ad-
justment for Methyl Isocyanate (MIC).
See 1152
Superfund Guide to RCRA Management Re-
quirements for Mineral Processing Wastes.
See 0439
Superfund Information Repositories and Ad-
ministrative Records: Introduction for Librar-
ians.
See 0497
Superfund Information Repositories and Ad-
ministrative Records.
See 0884
Superfund Innovative Technology Evaluation
Program: Progress and Accomplishments,
Fiscal Year 1989. A Third Report to Con-
gress.
See 1311
Superfund Innovative Technology Evaluation
Program: Progress and Accomplishments,
Fiscal Year 1990. A Fourth Report to Con-
gress.
See 1312
Superfund Innovative Technology Evaluation
Program: Progress and Accomplishments
Fiscal Year 1991. A 5th Report to Congress.
See 1313
Superfund Innovative Technology Evaluation
Program: Spring Update to the Technology
Profiles. Fourth Edition.
See 1314
Superfund Innovative Technology Evaluation
Program: Technology Profiles, Fifth Edition.
See 1315
Superfund Innovative Technology Evaluation
Program: Technology Profiles, November
1989.
See 1317
Superfund Innovative Technology Evaluation
Program: Technology Profiles, Sixth Edition.
See 1318
Superfund Innovative Technology Evaluation
Technology Demonstration Summary: Chem-
fix Solidification/Stabilization Process, Clack-
amas, Oregon.
See 1564
Superfund LDR Guide No. 1: Overview of
RCRA Land Disposal Restrictions (LDRs).
See 0440
Superfund LDR Guide No. 2: Complying with
the California List Restrictions under Land
Disposal Restrictions (LDRs).
See 0441
Superfund LDR Guide No. 3: Treatment
Standards and Minimum Technology Re-
quirements under Land Disposal Restrictions
(LDRS).
See 0442
Superfund LDR Guide No. 4: Complying with
the Hammer Restrictions under Land Dis-
posal Restrictions (LDRs).
See 0443
Superfund LDR Guide No. 5: Determining
When Land Disposal Restrictions (LDRs) Are
'Applicable' to CERCLA Response Actions.
See 0444
Superfund LDR Guide No. 6A (2nd Edition)
Obtaining a Soil and Debris Treatabilrty Vari-
ance for Remedial Actions.
See 0445
Superfund LDR Guide No. 7. Determining
When Land Disposal Restrictions (LDRs) Are
Relevant and Appropriate to CERCLA Re-
sponse Actions.
See 0446
Superfund Policy Forum Update, Volume 1,
Number 1, February 1992.
See 0324
Superfund Program Implementation Manual,
Fiscal Year 1994. Volume 1. Program Goals
and Planning Requirements. Volume 2. Pro-
gram Implementation Procedures.
See 0124
Superfund Program Management Manual,
Fiscal Year 1994.
See 0073
Superfund Program: Ten Years of Progress.
See 0977
Superfund Progress - Aficionado's Version:
Progress as of June 30,1992.
See 0325
Superfund Progress - Aficionado's Version
(Progress as of March 31, 1992).
See 0326
Superfund Progress. Aficionado's Version.
Progress as of September 30, 1992.
See 0327
Superfund Progress: Fall/Winter 1992.
See 0328
Superfund Progress, Spring 1992.
See 0329
Superfund Progress, Summer 1992.
See 0330
Superfund: Qualified Disadvantaged Busi-
ness Utilization in State Response.
See 0498
Superfund Remedial Program Financial Man-
agement Authority, Responsibilities and Pro-
cedures.
See 1137
SU-39
-------
HAZARDOUS MATERIALS
!i',;:, : i "' '"im: if
SUBJECT INDEX
Suporfund Removal Procedures: Action
Momorandum Guidance.
Sea 1012
Suporfund Removal Procedures: Guidance
i;pn the Consideration of ARABS during Re-
moval Actions.
See 1013
Suporfund Removal Procedures: Public Par-
: Scipatton Guidance for On-Scene Coordina-
tors: Community Relations and the Adminis-
trative Record.
See 1014
Suporfund Removal Procedures: Removal
Enforcement Guidance for On-Scene Coordi-
nators.
See 1015
Suporfund Responsiveness Summaries (Su-
porfund Management Review: Recommen-
dation Number 43E),
See 0125
Suporfund Revltafeation: Measures of Suc-
• pass. .....
Soo 0334
Suporfund Strategic Plan and Implementa-
tion Strategy Fiscal Year 1 994.
..... See 0126 .............................
Suportund Strategic Plan and Implementa-
tion Strategy Fiscal Year 1994: Office and
Division Plans.
Sao 0127
Suporfund Technical Assistance Grant
(TAG) Handbook.
Soe 0499
Superfund Technical Assistance Grants.
i'&M 0502 . . . ...... ........ ..........
« SoperiurkJ Technical Assistance Grants Pro-
gram: Regional Guidance Manual.
Seo0504
lemental Guidance on Federal Super-
...............
Supplemental Guidance on Performing Risk
Assessments in Remedial Investlgatlon/Fea-
sibifity Studies (Rl/FSs). Conducted by Po-
tentially Responsible Parties (PRPs).
See 1078
Supplemental Guidance to RAGS: Calculat-
ing th» Concentration Term. Volume 1,
Number 1, May 1992.
-gee, 1079, .................
Supporting State Attorneys General
'""CERCLA pemegla! and Enforcement Activi-
ties at NPL Sites'. ..................
Soo 0506
Survey of Materials-Handling Technologies
Used at Hazardous Waste Sites.
........ See 1323
Synopses of Federal Demonstrations of In-
novative Site Remediation Technologies.
See 1324
Technical Background Document for Draft
SQ^ Screening Level Guidance.
See 1537
Technical Guidance Document: Construction
''Qualify Management for Remedial Action
" ami Remedial Design Waste Containment
Systems.
Soo 1334
l/Tacftnteal Resource Document: Solldifica-
jj* tton/Stabilizatlori and Its Application to
.Waste Materials.
See 1565
Technical Support Services for Superfund
Site Remediation. Second Edition.
See 1335
Technology Demonstration Summary: Bio
Trol Soil Washing System for Treatment of a
Wood Preserving Site.
Sea 1633
Technology Demonstration Summary,
DuPont/Oberlin Microfiltration System, Pal-
merton, Pennsylvania. April-May 1992.
See 1336
Technology Evaluation Report: Babcock and
Wilcox Cyclone Furnace Vitrification Tech-
nology. Volume 1.
See 1337
Technology Evaluation Report: Babcock and
Wilcox Cyclone Furnace Vitrification Tech-
nology. Volume 2.
See 1338
Technology Evaluation Report: International
Waste Technologies/Geo-Con In situ Stabili-
zation/Solidification. Volume 3. Update
Report.
See 1567
Technology Evaluation Report: International
Waste Technologies/Geo-Con In situ Stabili-
zation/Solidification. Volume 4. Update
Report.
See 1568
Technology Evaluation Report of Retech,
Inc., Plasma Centrifugal Furnace. Volume 1.
See 1340
Technology Evaluation Report of Retech,
Inc., Plasma Centrifugal Furnace. Volume 2.
See 1341
Technology Evaluation Report: Ogden Circu-
lating Bed Combustor at the McColl Super-
fund Site.
See 1344
Technology Evaluation Report: SITE Pro-
gram. CF Systems Organics Extraction
System, New Bedford, Massachusetts.
Volume 1.
See 1346
Technology Evaluation Report: SITE Pro-
gram. CF Systems Organics Extraction
System, New Bedford, Massachusetts.
Volume 2.
See 1347
Technology Evaluation Report: SITE Pro-
gram Demonstration. EPA RREL's Mobile
Volume Reduction Unit.
See 1348
Technology Evaluation Report: Site Program
Demonstration of a Trial Excavation at the
McColl Superfund Site.
See 1349
Technology Evaluation Report: SITE Pro-
gram Demonstration of the DuPont/Oberlin
Microfiltration Technology.
See 1350
Technology Evaluation Report: SITE Pro-
gram Demonstration of the Ultrox Interna-
tional Ultraviolet Radiation/Oxidation Tech-
nology.
See 1351
Technology Evaluation Report SITE Program
Demonstration Test, HAZCON Solidification,
Douglassville, Pennsylvania. Volume 1.
See 1569
Technology Evaluation Report: SITE Pro-
gram Demonstration Test, Soliditech, Inc.,
Solidification/Stabilization Process. Volume
1.
See 1570
Technology Evaluation Report: SITE Pro-
gram Demonstration Test, Soliditech, Inc.
Solidification/Stabilization Process. Volume
2.
See 1571
Technology Transfer Needs Assessment,
1990.
See 1354
Terra Vac In situ Vacuum Extraction System:
Applications Analysis Report.
See 1355
Terra Vac In situ Vacuum Extraction System:
Applications Analysis Report.
See 1356
Thermal Desorption Treatment.
See 1357
Timely Initiation of Responsible Party
Searches, Issuance of Notice Letters, and
Release of Information (Attachment XXII).
See 0886
Toronto Harbour Commissioners (THC) Soil
Recycle Treatment Train. Applications Analy-
sis Report.
See 1544
Total Quality Management (TQM) and Qual-
ity Assurance (QA) in Superfund.
See 0996
Toxicological Implementations of Remediat-
ing Hazardous Wastes.
See 1359
Toxicological Profile for
Benzo(b)Fluoranthene.
See 1360
Transmittal of Guidance on Use and En-
forcement of CERCLA Information Requests
and Administrative Subpoenas.
See 0887
Transmittal of Model Consent Decree for
CERCLA Section 104(e) Information Re-
quest Enforcement Actions.
See 0888
Transmittal of the Final Waste Oil Interim
Enforcement Guidance Document.
See 0889
Treatability Studies Contractor Work Assign-
ments.
See 0076
Treatability Studies Under CERCLA: An
Overview.
See 1172
U.S. Bureau of Reclamation Assistance to
the Superfund Program.
See 1138
Understanding Bioremediation: A Guidebook
for Citizens.
See 0507
Understanding Superfund Risk Assessment.
See 0508
United States Environmental Protection
Agency Model CERCLA RD/RA Consent
Decree.
See 0890
Update No. 2 to 'Procedures for Completion
and Deletion of NPL Sites'.
See 0395
Updated Health Effects Assessment for Ace-
tone.
See 1080
USAGE Preplaced and Rapid Response
Contracts.
See 1139
Use of CERCLA Section 106 Unilateral En-
forcement for Remedial Design and Remedi-
al Action: Strategy for Fiscal Year 1990.
See 0891
Use of Office of Research and Develop-
ment's Bioremediation Expertise in Super-
fund Removal Program.
See 1016
Use of Removal Approaches to Speed Up
Remedial Action Projects.
See 1140
Use of Time and Materials and Cost Reim-
bursement Subcontracts for Remedial Ac-
tions under the Alternative Remedial Con-
tracting Strategy Contracts.
See 1141
USEPA Contract Laboratory Program Nation-
al Functional Guidelines for Organic Data
Review.
See 0077
SU-40
-------
SUBJECT INDEX
ILLINOIS
User's Guide to the Contract Laboratory Pro-
gram.
See 0079
User's Guide to the Contract Laboratory Pro-
gram.
See 0080
Using State and Local Officials to Assist in
Community Relations (Superfund Manage-
ment Review: Recommendation No. 43.K.L).
See 0128
Vendor Information Form to be Completed
for Participation in the: Vendor Information
System for Innovative Treatment Technol-
ogies (VISITT).
See 1369
Written Demand for CERCLA Cost Recov-
ery.
See 0894
Written Demand for Recovery of Costs In-
curred Under the Comprehensive Environ-
mental Response, Compensation, and Liabil-
ity Act (CERCLA).
See 0895
HAZARDOUS MATERIALS SPILLS
Handbook: Responding to Discharges of
Sinking Hazardous Substances.
See 1589
HAZARDOUS MATERIALS TRANSPORTATION
Notification of Out-of-State Shipments of Su-
perfund Site Wastes.
See 0429
Report to Congress: Settlements with Munic-
'ipal Waste Generators and Transporters
Since 1991 under the Comprehensive Envi-
ronmental Response, Compensation, and Li-
ability Act of 1980.
See 0596
HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES
Identification of SARA (Superfund Amend-
ments and Reauthorization Act) Compounds
in Adipose Tissue.
See 1055
HAZARDOUS WASTES
First 125 De Minimis Settlements: Statistics
from EPA's De Minimis Database.
See 0543
Forum on Innovative Hazardous Waste
Treatment Technologies: Domestic and
International. Held in Atlanta, Georgia on
June 19-21, 1989. Abstract Proceedings.
See 1252
International Symposium on Field Screening
Methods for Hazardous Wastes and Toxic
Chemicals (2nd), Proceedings. Held in Las
Vegas, Nevada on February 12-14,1991.
See 1279
Methodologies for Implementation of
CERCLA Section 122(g) (1) (A) De Minimis
Waste Contributor Settlements Proposals
and Agreements.
See 0572
Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Clean-
up Efforts Nationwide, Summer 1993 (Rogue
Valley/Ditch Creek Ranch Site Profile,
Wimer, Oregon).
See 0969
Waiver of Headquarters Approval for Issu-
ance of RD/RA Special Notice Letters at the
Time of ROD Signature from OERR and
OWPE.
See 0893
HAZCON SOLIDIFICATION PROCESS
Technology Evaluation Report SITE Program
Demonstration Test, HAZCON Solidification,
Douglassville, Pennsylvania. Volume 1.
See 1569
HEALTH HAZARDS
Health Effects Assessment Summary
Tables.
See 1051
Health Effects Assessment Summary
Tables.
See 1052
Health Effects Assessment Summary
Tables.
See 1053
Health Effects Assessment Summary Tables
Fourth Quarter FY 1989.
See 1054
Methodology for Evaluating Potential Car-
cinogenicity in Support of Reportable Quanti-
ty Adjustments Pursuant to CERCLA Section
102.
See 1146
HEALTH RISK
Role of Health Research in Support of
EPA's Regulatory Programs.
See 1074
HEAT TREATMENT
Guide for Conducting Treatability Studies
under CERCLA: Thermal Desorption
Remedy Selection. Interim Guidance.
See 1170
SITE Emerging Technologies Project: Bab-
cock and Wilcox Cyclone Vitrification.
See 1303
Technology Evaluation Report of Retech's
Plasma Centrifugal Furnace. Volume 1.
See 1342
Technology Evaluation Report of Retech's
Plasma Centrifugal Furnace. Volume 2.
See 1343
HEAVY METALS
Development of Electro-Acoustic Soil De-
• contamination (ESD) Process for In situ Ap-
plications.
See 1498
Framework for Real-Time Decision-Making:
New Bedford Harbor Pilot Dredging Study.
See 1587
Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Clean-
up Efforts Nationwide, Fall 1993 (Johns-
Manville Site Profile, Illinois).
See 0952
HIGH-LEVEL RADIOACTIVE WASTES
Implementation Plan for the Record of Deci-
sion for Disposal of Hanford Defense High-
Level, Transuranic, and Tank Wastes.
See 1266
HIGH TEMPERATURE TESTS
Superfund Innovative Technology Evaluation
(SITE): Demonstration Bulletin. Flame Reac-
tor, Horsehead Resource Development
Company, Inc.
See 1319
HIGHT TEMPERATURE TESTS
Technology Evaluation Report: SITE Pro-
gram Demonstration Test Horsehead Re-
source Development Company, Inc., Flame
Reactor Technology, Monaoa, Pennsylvania.
See 1353
HILLSBOROUGH TOWNSHIP (NEW JERSEY)
Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Clean-
up Efforts Nationwide, Fall 1992. (Krysowaty
Farm, Hillsborough, New Jersey).
See 0945
HISTORY
Superfund Emergency Response Actions: A
Summary of Federally-Funded Removals.
Volume 1.
See 0316
Superfund Emergency Response Actions: A
Summary of Federally-Funded Removals.
Volume 2.
See 0317
HORSEHEAD RESOURCE DEVELOPMENT
COMPANY
Horsehead Resource Development Compa-
ny, Inc. Flame Reactor Technology: Applica-
tions Analysis Report.
See 1263
HOTLINE REPORTS
Index to the Monthly Hotline Report Ques-
tions (June 1982 to December 1991).
See 0139
HRD FLAME REACTOR
Horsehead Resource Development Compa-
ny, Inc., Flame Reactor Technology. Tech-
nology Demonstration Summary.
See 1264
HRS (HAZARD RANKING SYSTEM)
PREscore Software. Users Manual and Tuto-
rial. Version 1.0.
See 0374
HUMANS
Risk Assessment Guidance for Superfund.
Volume 1. Human Health Evaluation Manual.
Supplemental Guidance: 'Standard Default
Exposure Factors'.
See 1071
HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY
Measurement of Hydraulic Conductivity Dis-
tributions: A Manual of Practice.
See 1467
HYDRAULIC FRACTURING
Hydraulic Fracturing Technology: Technolo-
gy Evaluation Report and Application Analy-
sis Report.
See 1265
HYDROGEOLOGY
Hydrogeology and Results of Aquifer Tests
in the Vicinity of a Hazardous-Waste Dispos-
al Site Near Byron, Illinois.
See 1463
New Approach and Methodologies for Char-
acterizing the Hydrogeologic Properties of
Aquifers.
See 1470
HYDROLOGY
Application of a Water Quality Assessment
Modeling System at a Superfund Site.
See 1573
IDAHO
National Priorities List Sites: Idaho.
See 0181
National Priorities List Sites: Idaho.
See 0182
National Priorities List Sites: Idaho, 1992.
See 0183
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Idaho.
See 0651
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Idaho.
See 0652
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Idaho.
See 0653
IDENTIFYING
Superfund Guide: Clean Air Act Hazardous
Air Pollutants Added to the List of CERCLA
Hazardous Substances.
See 1151
ILLINOIS
National Priorities List Sites: Illinois.
See 0184
National Priorities List Sites: Illinois.
See 0185
National Priorities List Sites: Illinois, 1992.
See 0186
SU-41
-------
ll!!','Si illiiliilllllll'illill'i ''SB': fll!1
IMMUNOASSAY
SUBJECT INDEX
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Illinois.
Sea 0654
Stte Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Illinois.
Sea 0855
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Illinois.
S0656
IMMUNOASSAY ............................
Suporfund Innovative Technology Evaluation
Program Demonstration Plan for Westing-
house Bio-Analytic Systems Pentachloro-
phonol Immunoassays.
Sea 1310
Suporfund Innovative Technology Evaluation
(SITE) Program Evaluation Report for Antox
BTX Water Screen (BTX Immunoassay).
S««1320 ..............
IMPROVEMENT
Compendium of Good Ideas: Models of Suc-
cess and Lessons Learned. Volume 1. High-
tights,
S*»0133
Compendium of Good Ideas: Models of Suc-
cess and Lessons Learned. Volume 2.
•-Source Book.
508 °134
IN-SITU PROCESSING
In situ Soil Flushing. Engineering Bulletin.
Soe 1510
In situ Soil Vapor Extraction Treatment
S«« 1511
in sttu Stoam Extraction Treatment
SoeiSii ...................
In «itu Treatment of Contaminated Ground
Water; An Invfnjory of Research and Field
Demonstrations arid Strategies for Improving
Ground Water Remediation Technologies.
. ..... See 1466
Innovative Technology: In-situ Vitrification.
Se«1514
IN smj TREATMENT
Prospocis for in situ Chemical Treatment for
Contaminated Soil,
..... Sea 1525
INCINERATION
I Incineration Data on Arsenic and Lead Emis-
,, ..........
Se« 1267
Mobile/Transportable Incineration Treat-
"•jnerit
See 1481
Operations and Research at the U.S. EPA
Incineration Research Facility: Annual
Report for FY89.
Sea 1482
Operations and Research at the U.S. EPA
Incineration Research Facility: Annual
Report for FY90.
S«*1483
Operations and Research at the U.S. EPA
: Incineration Research Facility: Annual
Report for FY92.
Sea 1485
Pilot-Scale Incineration of Contaminated Soil
from the Chemical Insecticide Corporation
Superfund Site.
Sea 1523
'.: Ptot-Scaie Incineration of PCB-Contaminat-
«d Sedimenls from the New Bedford Harbor
Hot Spot Superfund Site.
Sea 1292
Comparison: Organic Emissions from Haz-
ardous Waste Incinerators versus the 1990
Toxics Release Inventory Air Releases.
Se« 1217
Control of Transient Incinerator Emissions
with an Oxygen Based Combustion System.
See 1401
SU-42
Incineration Treatment of Arsenic-Contami-
nated Soil.
See 1268
Pilot-Scale Incinerability Evaluation of Ar-
senic-and Lead-Contaminated Soils from
Two Superfund Sites.
See 1288
Pilot-Scale Incineration of PCB-Contaminat-
ed Sediments from the Hot Spot of the New
Bedford Harbor Superfund Site.
See 1291
Superfund Engineering Issue: Issues Affect-
ing the Applicability and Success of Remedi-
al/Removal Incineration Projects.
See 1308
INCINERATION RESEARCH FACILITY
Pilot-Scale Incineration of Contaminated
Sludges from the Bofors-Nobel Superfund
Site.
See 1289
INCINERATORS
American Combustion Pyretron Destruction
System. Applications Analysis Report.
See 1193
Mobile Incineration: An Analysis of the In-
dustry.
See 1480
Operations and Research at the U.S. EPA
Incineration Research Facility: Annual
Report for FY91.
See 1484
Pilot-Scale Incineration of Comtarninated
Soils from the Drake Chemical Superfund
Site.
See 1522
Pilot-Scale Incineration of Contaminated
Sludges from the Bofors-Nobel Superfund
Site.
See 1289
Pilot-Scale Incineration of Contaminated Soil
from the Purity Oil Sales and McColl Super-
fund Sites.
See 1290
Behavior of Arsenic in a Rotary Kiln Inciner-
ator (Journal Version).
See 1204
Comparison of Organic Emissions from Haz-
ardous Waste Incinerators versus the 1990
Toxic Release Inventory Air Releases.
See 1397
Potential Surrogate Metals for Incinerator
Trial Burns.
See 1486
SITE Demonstration of the American Com-
bustion Pyretron Oxygen-Enhanced Burner.
See 1299
Retech, Inc., Plasma Centrifugal Furnace:
Applications Analysis Report.
See 1295
Superfund Engineering Issue: Considerations
for Evaluating the Impact of Metals Partition-
ing during the Incineration of Contaminated
Soils from Superfund Sites.
See 1534
Technology Evaluation Report of Retech,
Inc., Plasma Centrifugal Furnace. Volume 1.
See 1340
Technology Evaluation Report of Retech,
Inc., Plasma Centrifugal Furnace. Volume 2.
See 1341
Technology Evaluation Report: Site Program
Demonstration of a Trial Excavation at the
McColl Superfund Site.
See 1349
INDEXES (DOCUMENTATION)
Environmental Monitoring Methods Index
(EMMI), Version 1.0 (5 - User LAN) (for
Microcomputers).
See 1238
Environmental Monitoring Methods Index
(EMMI), Version 1.0 (for Microcomputers).
See 1239
Index to the Monthly Hotline Report Ques-
tions (June 1982 to December 1991).
See 0139
INDIANA
National Priorities List Sites: Indiana.
See 0187
National Priorities List Sites: Indiana.
See 0188
National Priorities List Sites: Indiana, 1992.
See 0189
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Indiana.
See 0657
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Indiana.
See 0658
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Indiana.
See 0659
INDICATOR SPECIES
Criteria for Choosing Indicator Species for
Ecological Risk Assessments at Superfund
Sites (90-6402).
See 1224
INDIGENOUS MICROORGANISMS
Citizen's Guide to Using Indigenous and Ex-
ogenous Microorganisms in Bioremediation.
See 0461
INDOOR AIR POLLUTION
Assessing Potential Indoor Air Impacts for
Superfund Sites. Air/Superfund National
Technical Guidance Study Series.
See 1395
Options for Developing and Evaluating Miti-
gation Strategies for Indoor Air Impacts at
CERCLA Sites. Air/Superfund National
Technical Guidance Study Series, Report
ASF-36.
See 1415
INDUSTRIAL HYGIENE
Health Effects Assessment for Benzene.
See 1035
Health Effects Assessment for Cadmium.
See 1036
Health Effects Assessment for Carbon Tet-
rachloride.
See 1037
Health Effects Assessment for Chlordane.
See 1038
Health Effects Assessment for Chloroben-
zene.
See 1039
Health Effects Assessment for Chloroform.
See 1040
Health Effects Assessment for DDT.
See 1041
Health Effects Assessment for Methyl Ethyl
Ketone.
See 1042
Health Effects Assessment for Methyiene
Chloride.
See 1043
Health Effects Assessment for Naphthalene.
See 1044
Health Effects Assessment for Phenol.
See 1045
Health Effects Assessment for Styrene.
See 1046
Health Effects Assessment for Tetrachlor-
oethylene.
See 1047
Health Effects Assessment for Trichloroethy-
lene.
See 1048
i|
-------
SUBJECT INDEX
INSPECTION
Health Effects Assessment for Xylenes.
See 1049
Health Effects Assessment for 2,4,5-Trichlor-
ophenoxy Acetic Acid (2,4,5-T).
See 1050
Updated Health Effects Assessment for Ace-
tone.
See 1080
INDUSTRIAL SAFETY
Estimation of the Cost of Using Chemical
Protective Clothing.
See 1244
INDUSTRIAL WASTE TREATMENT
CERCLA Site Discharges to POTWs: Guid-
ance Manual.
See 1576
Technology Evaluation Report: SITE Pro-
gram Demonstration Test Horsehead Re-
source Development Company, Inc., Flame
Reactor Technology, Monaca, Pennsylvania.
See 1353
INDUSTRIAL WASTES
Ecosystem Effects of Superfund. National
Priority List Sites in Industrial Landscapes: A
Framework for Policy Decisions.
See 0135
Overview of Selected EPA (Environmental
Protection Agency) Regulations and Guid-
ance Affecting POTW (Publicly Owned
Treatment Works) Management.
See 0432
Use of 'Seienastrum capricornutum' to
Assess the Toxicity Potential of Surface and
Ground Water Contamination Caused by
Chromium Waste.
See 1367
Tracking Toxic Substances at Industrial Fa-
cilities: Engineering Mass Balance versus
Materials Accounting.
See 1362
INDUSTRIES
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP National Listing Alphabetically by Party
Name.
See 0826
INFORMATION CENTERS
Superfund Information Repositories and Ad-
ministrative Records: Introduction for Librar-
ians.
See 0497
INFORMATION DISSEMINATION
Superfund Technical Assistance Grant
(TAG) Handbook: Applying for Your Grant
See 0500
Superfund Technical Assistance Grant
(TAG) Handbook: The Application Forms
with Instructions.
See 0501
INFORMATION MANAGEMENT
Index to the Monthly Hotline Report Ques-
tions (June 1982 to December 1991).
See 0139
Inside the Hotline: A Compilation of 1991
Monthly Hotline Reports.
See 0140
Superfund Program and Information Man-
agement Update. Volume 1, Number 1, No-
vember 1993.
See 0123
INFORMATION SYSTEMS
Accessing Federal Data Bases for Contami-
nated Site Clean-Up Technologies (Second
Edition).
See 1189
CERCLIS - WasteLAN - CleanLAN.
See 0015
Superfund Soils Data Management System.
See 1536
Vendor Information System for Innovative
Treatment Technologies (VISITT). Number 1.
See 1370
INFRARED SPECTROMETERS
Long-Path FTIR Measurements of Volatile
Organic Compounds in an Industrial Setting
(July 1989-April 1991).
See 1413
INNOVATIVE TREATMENT TECHNOLOGIES
Carver-Greenfield Process (Trade Name)
Dehydro-Tech Corporation. Applications
Analysis Report.
See 1207
Chemical Waste Management, Inc.
PO*WW*ER (Trade Name) Evaporation-
Catalytic Oxidation Technology. Technology
Evaluation Report. Volume 1.
See 1213
Chemical Waste Management, Inc.
PO*WW*ER (Trade Name) Evaporation-
Catalytic Oxidation Technology. Technology
Evalution Report. Volume 2.
See 1214
Citizen's Guide to Air Sparging.
See 0452
Citizen's Guide to Bioventing.
See 0453
Citizen's Guide to In situ Soil Flushing.
See 0456
Citizen's Guide to Innovative Treatment
Technologies for Contaminated Soils,
Sludges, Sediments and Debris.
See 0457
Citizen's Guide to Using Indigenous and Ex-
ogenous Microorganisms in Bioremediation.
See 0461
CWM PO*WW*ER (Trade Name) Evapora-
tion-Catalytic Oxidation Technology: Applica-
tions Analysis Report.
See 1225
Evaluation of Soil Venting Application.
Ground Water Issue.
See 1505
Innovative Treatment Technologies: Semi-
Annual Status Report. (Third Edition).
See 1275
Literature Survey of Innovative Technologies
for Hazardous Waste Site Remediation,
1987-1991.
See 1281
Pilot-Scale Demonstration of a Slurry-Phase
Biological Reactor for Creosote-Contaminat-
ed Soil. Applications Analysis Report.
See 1426
Chemical Stabilization of Mixed Organic and
Metal Compounds. EPA SITE Program Dem-
onstration of the Silicate Technology Corpo-
ration Process.
See 1212
Control Technology: 1992 Update of U.S.
EPA's Superfund Innovative Technology
Evaluation (SITE) Emerging Technology Pro-
gram.
See 1223
SITE Emerging Technologies Project: Bab-
cock and Wilcox Cyclone Vitrification.
See 1303
Superfund Innovative Technology Evaluation
Program: Progress and Accomplishments,
Fiscal Year 1990. A Fourth Report to Con-
See 1312
Superfund Innovative Technology Evaluation
Program: Progress and Accomplishments
Fiscal Year 1991. A 5th Report to Congress.
See 1313
Superfund Innovative Technology Evaluation
Program: Technology Profiles, Fifth Edition.
See 1315
Synopses of Federal Demonstrations of In-
novative Site Remediation Technologies.
See 1324
Tech Trends (Number 10).
See 1330
Technology Evaluation Report: Babcock and
Wilcox Cyclone Furnace Vitrification Tech-
nology. Volume 1.
See 1337
Technology Evaluation Report: Babcock and
Wilcox Cyclone Furnace Vitrification Tech-
nology. Volume 2.
See 1338
Technology Evaluation Report of Retech's
Plasma Centrifugal Furnace. Volume 1.
See 1342
Technology Evaluation Report of Retech's
Plasma Centrifugal Furnace. Volume 2.
See 1343
Toronto Harbour Commissioners (THC) Soil
Recycle Treatment Train. Applications Analy-
sis Report.
See 1544
INORGANIC COMPOUNDS
Inorganic Contract Compliance Screening
System (ICCSS) Software (1LM02.1 Version
2) (for Microcomputers).
See 0036
Inorganic Contract Compliance Screening
System (ICCSS) Software (ILM02.1 Version
3) (for Microcomputers).
See 0037
Inorganic Contract Compliance Screening
System (ICCSS) Software (ILM02.1 Version
5) (for Microcomputers).
See 0039
Inorganic Contract Compliance Screening
System (ICCSS) Software (SOW March
1990) (Version 1) (for Microcomputers).
See 0040
Inorganic Contract Compliance Screening
System Software for the PC (SOW March
1990 Version 1). User Manual.
See 0041
USEPA Contract Laboratory Program Nation-
al Functional Guidelines for Inorganic Data
Review.
See 0997
INORGANIC CONTRACT COMPLIANCE
SCREENING SYSTEM
Inorganic Contract Compliance Screening
System (ICCSS) Software (ILM02.1 Version
2) (for Microcomputers).
See 0036
Inorganic Contract Compliance Screening
System (ICCSS) Software (ILM02.1 Version
3) (for Microcomputers).
See 0037
Inorganic Contract Compliance Screening
System (ICCSS) Software (SOW March
1990) (Version 1) (for Microcomputers).
See 0040
Inorganic Contract Compliance Screening
System Software for the PC (SOW March
1990 Version 1). User Manual.
See 0041
INSECTICIDES
Pilot-Scale Incineration of Contaminated Soil
from the Chemical Insecticide Corporation
Superfund Site.
See 1523
INSPECTION
Guidance for Performing Site Inspections
under CERCLA.
See 0343
SU-43
-------
INSTALLATION MANUALS
! Guidance on Sailing Priorities for NPL Can-
didate Sites.
Sea 0344
Gukte to Management of Investigation-De-
rivod Wastes.
Sea 0345
- Installation Restoratton Program Technical
, Support Document for Record of Decision,
Tataltna Air Force "Station LRRS Site.
Sea 1277
Management of Investigation-Derived
Wastes during Site Inspections.
See 0349
Procedures to Ensure that CLP Laboratories
Are Not Paid for Non-Compliant or Unuse-
ablaData.
Sea 0062
INSTALLATION MANUALS
Reid CertiflcaUon Tracking System (FCTS).
User's GukJe. Version 2.1.
::;See 0909
INTEREST RATE
: Revisions to OMB Circular A-94 on Guide-
Bnfis and Discount Rates for Benefit-Cost
Analysis,
Sea 1107
INTERNATIONAL WASTE TECHNOLOGY
In-situ Stabilization/Solidification of PCB
(Polyohlorinated Biphenyls)-Contaminated
Soil,
Sea 1556
INTERSTATE TRANSPORTATION
Notification of bu¥bf-State Shipments of Su-
porfund Site Wastes.
See 0429
INTERVIEWS
=; Ro(a pf Cornmuqjty Interviews in the Devel-
opment oJ a Community Relations Program
for Remedial Response.
S080485
Superfund Fact Sheet: Community Inter-
«!" views.
Sea 0490
IONS "' '_ |. . ', '"^ ' [ t
Metals Testing Report: Metal Content of En-
vironmental Samples from Regton 4.
See 1282
IOWA"'1 ' '"" "" "":
National Priorities List Sites: Iowa.
Sea 0190
:: National Priorities List Sites: Iowa.
"Sea 0191
"National PrioritiesUst'Sites: Iowa, 1992.
Sea 0192
jj Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listingi by site for Iowa.
See 0660
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Iowa.
Sea 0661
Sita Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP UsUng by Site for Iowa.
Sea 0662
KANSAS
National Priorities List Sites: Kansas.
Soa 0193
National Priorities List Sites: Kansas.
See 0194
National Priorities List Sites: Kansas, 1992.
See 0195
I Sita Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PHP Listing by Site for Kansas.
See 0663
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Sita for Kansas.
See 0664
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Kansas.
See 0665
SUBJECT INDEX
KENTUCKY
National Priorities List Sites: Kentucky.
See 0196
National Priorities List Sites: Kentucky.
See 0197
National Priorities List Sites: Kentucky, 1992.
See 0198
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Kentucky.
See 0666
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Kentucky.
See 0667
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Kentucky.
See 0668
KILNS
American Combustion Pyretron Destruction
System. Applications Analysis Report.
See 1193
Control of transient Incinerator Emissions
with an Oxygen Based Combustion System.
See 1401
KINETICS
Respirometric Methods for Determination of
Biodegradability and Biodegradation Kinetics
for Hazardous Organic Pollutant Com-
pounds.
See 1427
LABORATORIES
Guidelines for Effective Management of the
Contract Laboratory Program. Part 1. Con-
tract Award. Part 2. Contract Administration.
See 0028
Procedures to Ensure that CLP Laboratories
Are Not Paid for Non-Compliant or Unuse-
able Data.
See 0062
USEPA Contract Laboratory Program Nation-
al Functional Guidelines for Organic Data
Review.
See 0077
User's Guide to Contract Laboratory Pro-
gram.
See 0078
User's Guide to the Contract Laboratory Pro-
gram.
See 0080
LAND APPLICATION
Policy for Superfund Compliance with the
RCRA Land Disposal Restrictions.
See 0436
LAND DISPOSAL
Guidance Documents Relating to Landfills
and Contaminants.
See 1259
Superfund LDR Guide No. 1: Overview of
RCRA Land Disposal Restrictions (LDRs).
See 0440
Superfund LDR Guide No. 2: Complying with
the California List Restrictions under Land
Disposal Restrictions (LDRs).
See 0441
Superfund LDR Guide No. 3: Treatment
Standards and Minimum Technology Re-
quirements under Land Disposal Restrictions
(LDRS).
See 0442
Superfund LDR Guide No. 4: Complying with
the Hammer Restrictions under Land Dis-
posal Restrictions (LDRs).
See 0443
Superfund LDR Guide No. 5: Determining
When Land Disposal Restrictions (LDRs) Are
'Applicable' to CERCLA Response Actions.
See 0444
LAND DISPOSAL RESTRICTIONS
Analysis of Treatability Data for Soil and
Debris: Evaluation of Land Ban Impact on
Use of Superfund Treatment Technologies.
See 1488
Applicability of Land Disposal Restrictions to
RCRA and CERCLA Ground Water Treat-
ment Reinjection Superfund Management
Review: Recommendation No. 26.
See 1430
Land Disposal Restrictions as Relevant and
Appropriate Requirements for CERCLA Con-
taminated Soil and Debris.
See 0428
LAND MANAGEMENT
Future Land Use Scenarios for Federal Fa-
cilities.
See 0897
LAND OWNERSHIP
Future Land Use Scenarios for Federal Fa-
cilities.
See 0897
LAND POLLUTION
Air/Superfund National Technical Guidance
Study Series. Database of Emission Rate
Measurement Projects.
See 1379
Biological Assessment of Toxicity Caused by
Chemical Constituents Eluted from Site Soils
Collected at the Drake Chemical Superfund
Site, Lock Haven, Clinton Co., Pennsylvania.
See 1491
Criteria for Choosing Indicator Species for
Ecological Risk Assessments at Superfund
Sites (90-6402).
See 1224
Forum on Innovative Hazardous Waste
Treatment Technologies: Domestic and
International. Held In Atlanta, Georgia on
June 19-21,1989. Technical Papers.
See 1253
Future Land Use Scenarios for Federal Fa-
cilities;
See 0897
Ground-Water Issue: Soil sampling and anal-
ysis for volatile organic compounds.
See 1507
In-situ Stabilization/Solidification of PCB
(Polychlorinated Biphenyls)-Contaminated
Soil.
See 1556
Aseptic Sampling of Unconsolidated Heaving
Soils in Saturated Zones.
See 1489
Description of EPA SITE Demonstration of
the HAZCON Stabilization Process at the
Douglassville, Pennsylvania Superfund Site.
See 1552
EPA SITE Demonstration of the BioTrol Soil
Washing Process.
See 1502
EPA SITE Demonstration of the International
Waste Technologies/Geo-Con In situ Stabili-
zation/Solidification Process.
See 1553
On-Site Methods for Assessing Chemical
Impact on the Soil Environment Using Earth-
worms: A Case Study at the Baird and
McGuire Superfund Site, Holbrook, Massa-
chusetts.
See 1521
USEPA Contract Laboratory Program Nation-
al Functional Guidelines for Inorganic Data
Review.
See 0997
SU-44
,. Hi* ...... t> i , jl
...... j ..... iiiiiil ......... ,: ii ..... i ....... MIMIi ............... IlillPi J Uui .ia1 vi
• . iin-iii ......... '.- ........ :,i i; : ....... ......... i ...... iiiiJI! A,, ........ ............ it' ...... .1- . ..... ife ........ L
lii'iiniuil; iiiiHiililili,'.., ,1 IIIJ iJi; '!:.
-------
SUBJECT INDEX
LAWSUITS
LAND POLLUTION ABATEMENT
ARARs Q's and A's: State Ground-Water
Antidegradation Issues.
See 0402
Technology Evaluation Report: Chemfix
Technologies, Inc. Solidification/Stabilization
Process, Clackamas, Oregon. Volume 1.
See 1566
LAND POLLUTION CONTROL
AWD Technologies Integrated AquaDetox
(Trade Name)/SVE Technology: Applications
Analysis Report.
See 1202
BioGenesis (Trade Name) Soil Washing
Technology: Innovative Technology Evalua-
tion Report.
See 1490
DuPont/Oberlin Microfiltration Technology.
Applications Analysis Report.
See 1584
Evaluation and Testing of a Protocol to De-
termine the Aerobic Degradation Potential of
Hazardous Waste Constituents in Soil.
See 1503
Guide for Conducting Treatability Studies
under CERCLA: Soil Washing. Interim Guid-
ance.
See 1165
Guide for Conducting Treatability Studies
under CERCLA: Soil Washing: Quick Refer-
ence Fact Sheet.
See 1166
In situ Soil Flushing. Engineering Bulletin.
See 1510
Literature Review Summary of Metals Ex-
traction Processes Used to Remove Lead
from Soils.
See 1518
On-Site Engineering Report for the Low-
Temperature Thermal Desorption Pilot-Scale
Test on Contaminated Soil.
See 1519
Pilot-Scale Incineration of Comtaminated
Soils from the Drake Chemical Superfund
Site.
See 1522
Reductive Dehalogenation of Organic Con-
taminants in Soils and Ground Water.
Ground Water Issue.
See 1527
Control of Aromatic Waste Air Streams by
Soil Bioreactors.
See 1496
Demonstration of Microfiltration Technology.
See 1228
EPA Site Demonstration of the Terra Vac In
situ Vacuum Extraction Process in Grove-
land, Massachusetts. (Site Program Update:
Part VII).
See 1243
Extraction and Recovery of Lead Species
from Soil.
See 1506
U.S. EPA SITE Demonstration of AWD Tech-
nologies' AquaDetox/SVE System.
See 1363
Will Soil Working Work for the Sand Creek
Superfund Site.
See 1548
Superfund Emergency Response Actions: A
Summary of Federally Funded Removals.
Volume 3.
See 0318
Tech Trends (Number 10).
See 1330
Technology Evaluation Report: Biotrol Soil
Washing System for Treatment of a Wood
Preserving Site. Volume 1.
See 1539
Technology Evaluation Report: Biotrol Soil
Washing System for Treatment of a Wood
Preserving Site. Volume 2, Part A.
See 1540
Technology Evaluation Report: Biotrol Soil
Washing System for Treatment of a Wood
Preserving Site. Volume 2, Part B.
See 1541
Technology Evaluation Report CHEMFIX
Technologies, Inc., Solidification/Stabiliza-
tion Process, Clackamas, Oregon. Volume 2.
See 1339
Technology Evaluation Report: SITE Pro-
gram Demonstration of the DuPont/Oberlin
Microfiltration Technology.
See 1350
Technology Evaluation Report: Site Program
Demonstration Test. Accutech Pneumatic
Fracturing Extraction and Hot Gas Injection,
Phase 1. Volume 1.
See 1352
Technology Evaluation Report: Toronto Har-
bour Commissioners (THC) Soil Recycle
Treatment Train.
See 1543
Toxic Treatments 'In-situ' Steam/Hot-Air
Stripping Technology. Applications Analysis
Report.
See 1545
LAND POLLUTION DETECTION
Military Base Closures: Guidance on EPA
Concurrence in the Identification of Unconta-
minated Parcels under CERCLA Section
120(h)(4).
See 0899
LAND USE
Some Major Factors Important in Establish-
ing Land Use Policy for Remediated Super-
fund Sites.
See 0308
LANDFILLS
Engineering Bulletin: Landfill Covers.
See 1233
Presumptive Remedy for CERCLA Municipal
Landfill Sites.
See 1105
LANSDOWNE (PENNSYLVANIA)
Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Clean-
up Efforts Nationwide, Fall 1992. (Lans-
downe Radioactive Residence Site Profile).
See 0946
LASER INDUCED REACTIONS
SITE-Emerging Technologies: Laser Induced
Photochemical Oxidative Destruction of
Toxic Organics in Leachates and Ground-
waters.
See 1591
LAW ENFORCEMENT
CERCLA Enforcement Policy Compendium
Update.
See 0516
Procedural Guidance on Treatment of Insur-
ers under CERCLA.
See 0589
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
National PRP Listing Alphabetically by PRP
Name.
See 0616
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 1.
See 0739
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 1.
See 0740
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 2.
See 0744
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 2.
See 0745
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 3.
See 0749
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 4.
See 0753
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 4.
See 0754
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 5.
See 0758
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 5.
See 0759
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 6.
See 0763
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 6.
See 0764
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 7.
See 0768
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing fay Site for Region 7.
See 0769
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 8.
See 0773
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 8.
See 0774
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 9.
See 0779
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 10.
See 0783
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 10.
See 0784
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP National Listing Alphabetically by Party
Name.
See 0830
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP National Listing by Site.
See 0836
Waiver of Headquarters Approval for Issu-
ance of RD/RA Special Notice Letters at the
Time of ROD Signature from OERR and
OWPE.
See 0893
LAW (JURISPRUDENCE)
Interim Model CERCLA Section 122(g) (4)
De Minimis Waste Contributor Consent
Decree and Administrative Order on Con-
sent.
See 0565
Political Subdivision Involvement in Super-
fund.
See 0480
RCRA, Superfund Monthly Hot Line Reports.
See 0303
Some Major Factors Important in Establish-
ing Land Use Policy for Remediated Super-
fund Sites.
See 0308
LAWS
CERCLA Compliance with Other Laws
Manual. Part 1. Interim Final.
See 0409
LAWSUITS
Guidance on CERCLA Settlements with De
Micromis Waste Contributors.
See 0547
SU-45
-------
LEAD ACID BATTERIES
SUBJECT INDEX
:Modo) Litigation Report for CERCLA Bec-
kons 106 and 107 and RCRA Section 7003.
Se«0576
LEAD ACID BATTERIES '""';
Control Technologies for Defunct lead Bat-
tocy Recycling Sites: Overview and Recent
Developments. Volume 3.
Soo 1220
, Selection of Control Technologies for Reme-
: dtotlon of Lead Battery Recycling Sites. (En-
glncoring Bulletin).
Sao 1296
LEAD INORGANIC COMPOUNDS
Extraction and Recovery of Lead Species
frornSoH.
See 1506
LEAD (METAL)
Emergency Responders Agreements for
1 Fund-Lead Remedial Actions.
Sea 1001
Incineration Data on Arsenic and Lead Emis-
sions.
Sea 1267
Literature Review Summary of Metals Ex-
traction Processes Used to Remove Lead
from Soils.
See 1518
! Extraction and Recovery of Lead Species
fromSotl.
Sea 1506
Superfund Engineering issue: Treatment of
Load-Contaminated Soils.
Sea 1535
X-ray Fluorescence Survey of Lead Contami-
L" "rated Residential Soils In LeadviHe, Colora-
do: A Case Study.
:' Sea 1549
LEllSLATtOfJ " '""
Suporfund Reform Act of 1994.
See 0332
LIABILITIES
Covenants Not to Sue under SARA.
See 0526
Homeowners Exempted from Superfund
Cleanup Costs: National Policy Overview.
See 0426
Interim Guidance on Notice Letters, Negotia-
tions, and Information Exchange.
See 0560
Mode) Notes Letters.
Sea 0577
Streamlined Approach for Settlements with
:::„ De Mtnimls Waste Contributors under
CERCLA Section 122(g)(1)(A).
Sett 0870
LIENS,
Supplemental Guidance on Federal Super-
fund Uens.
See 0885
LIQUID FILTERS
DuPont/Oberlln Microfiltration Technology.
!' Applications Analysis Report.
See 1584
LIQUID WASTES
Air Stripping of Aqueous Solutions. Engineer-
ing Bulletin.
See 1371
Chemical Waste Management, Inc.
„ PO*WW'ER grade Name) Evaporatlon-
*•'• Catalytic Oxidation Technology. Technology
Evaluation Report. Volume 1.
See 1213
Chemical Waste Management, Inc.
PQ'WWER (Trade Name) Evaporation-
', Catalytic Oxidation Technology. Technology
I Evolution Report Volume 2.
Sea 1214
CWM PO*WW*ER (Trade Name) Evapora-
tion-Catalytic Oxidation Technology: Applica-
tions Analysis Report.
See 1225
DuPont/Oberlin Microfiltration Technology.
Applications Analysis Report.
See 1584
Evaluation of the Likelihood of DNAPL Pres-
ence at NPL Sites: National Results.
See 1448
Demonstration of Microfiltration Technology.
See 1228
Rotating Biological Contactors. Engineering
Bulletin.
See 1297
Technology Evaluation Report: SITE Pro-
gram Demonstration of the DuPont/Oberlin
Microfiltration Technology.
See 1350
LISTINGS
FACT BOOK: National Priorities List under
the Original Hazard Ranking System, 1981-
1991.
See 0340
LOCAL GOVERNMENT
Model Informational Notice Letter to Local
Governments.
See 0575
LOSS FUNCTION
Asymmetric Loss Function for Superfund Re-
mediation Decisions.
See 1200
LOUISIANA
National Priorities List Sites: Louisiana.
See 0199
National Priorities List Sites: Louisiana.
See 0200
National Priorities List Sites: Louisiana, 1992.
See 0201
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Louisiana.
See 0669
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Louisiana.
See 0670
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Louisiana.
See 0671
MAINE
National Priorities List Sites: Maine.
See 0202
National Priorities List Sites: Maine.
See 0203
National Priorities List Sites: Maine, 1992.
See 0204
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Maine.
See 0672
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Maine.
See 0673
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Maine.
See 0674
MANAGEMENT
Management Review of the Superfund Pro-
gram.
See 0101
Management Review of the Superfund Pro-
gram: Implementation Plan.
See 0102
MANAGEMENT PLANNING
Guidance for Data Useability in Risk Assess-
ment.
See 1030
Guidance for Data Useability in Risk Assess-
ment. Interim Report.
See 1032
Importance of Quality for Collection of Envi-
ronmental Samples. Planning, Implementing,
and Assessing Field Sampling Quality at
CERCLA Sites.
See 0919
Status of Key SACM Program Management
Issues: Interim Guidance, Volume 1, Number
1, December 1992.
See 0113
MANAGEMENT REVIEW
Planning for Sufficient Community Relations
(Superfund Management Review: No. 43A).
See 0108
Superfund Responsiveness Summaries (Su-
perfund Management Review: Recommen-
dation Number 43E).
See 0125
MANAGEMENT REVIEWS
Approval of Long Term Contracting Strategy
for Superfund (Superfund Management
Review: Recommendation E.2).
See 0018
MANUALS
Air/Superfund National Technical Guidance
Study Series. Air Stripper Design Manual.
See 1374
CERCLA Compliance with Other Laws
Manual. Part 1. Interim Rnal.
See 0409
CERCLA Site Discharges to POTWS Treat-
ability Manual.
See 1577
Citizens' Guidance Manual for the Technical
Assistance Grant Program.
See 0463
Hazard Ranking System Guidance Manual.
See 0346
Hazard Ranking System Guidance Manual.
See 0347
Superfund Desk Reference for Municipali-
ties.
See 0486
Superfund Docket Operations Manual for
Rulemaking Activities.
See 0081
MANUFACTURING
Guidelines for the Cleanup of Clandestine
Drug Laboratories.
See 1007
MARIANA ISLANDS
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Northern Marianas.
See 0720
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Northern Marianas.
See 0721
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Northern Marianas.
See 0722
MARINE BIOLOGY
Using the DNA Alkaline Unwinding Assay to
Detect DNA Damage in Laboratory and Envi-
ronmentally Exposed Cells and Tissues.
See 1368
MARINE DISPOSAL
Technology Evaluation Report: SITE Pro-
gram. CF Systems Organics Extraction
System, New Bedford, Massachusetts.
Volume 1.
See 1346
Technology Evaluation Report: SITE Pro-
gram. CF Systems Organics Extraction
System, New Bedford, Massachusetts.
Volume 2.
See 1347
SU-46
-------
SUBJECT INDEX
METALS
MARYLAND
National Priorities List Sites: Maryland.
See 0205
National Priorities List Sites: Maryland.
See 0206
National Priorities List Sites: Maryland, 1992
See 0207
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Maryland.
See 0675
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Maryland.
See 0676
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Maryland.
See 0677
MASS BALANCE
Tracking Toxic Substances at Industrial Fa-
cilities: Engineering Mass Balance versus
Maten'als Accounting.
See 1362
MASSACHUSETTS
National Priorities List Sites: Massachusetts
See 0208
National Priorities List Sites: Massachusetts,
1992.
See 0210
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Massachusetts.
See 0678
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Massachusetts.
See 0679
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Massachusetts.
See 0680
MATERIALS HANDLING
Control of Air Emissions from Materials Han-
dling during Remediation. Engineering Bulle-
tin.
See 1398
Survey of Materials-Handling Technologies
Used at Hazardous Waste Sites.
See 1323
MATERIALS RECOVERY
Horsehead Resource Development Compa-
ny, Inc. Flame Reactor Technology: Applica-
tions Analysis Report.
See 1263
Solvent Extraction Treatment.
See 1306
MATHEMATICAL MODELS
Air/Superfund National Technical Guidance
Study Series. Models for Estimating Air
Emission Rates from Superfund Remedial
Actions.
See 1388
Application of a Water Quality Assessment
Modeling System at a Superfund Site.
See 1573
Comparison of a Revised Area Source Algo-
rithm for the Industrial Source Complex
Short Term Model and Wind Tunnel Data
See 1216
New Approach and Methodologies for Char-
acterizing the Hydrogeologic Properties of
Aquifers.
See 1470
New Methods for Modeling the Transport of
Metals from Mineral Processing Wastes into
Surface Waters.
See 1590
Review and Evaluation of Area Source Dis-
persion Algorithms for Emission Sources at
Superfund Sites.
See 1416
Superfund Accelerated Cleanup Model
(SACM). Volume 1, Number 4, November
1992.
See 0122
MCINTOSH (ALABAMA)
Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Clean-
up Efforts Nationwide, Fall 1992. (Ciba-Geigy
Corporation, Mclntosh, Alabama).
See 0944
MEDICAL WASTES
Effect of OSHA's Bloodborne Pathogens
Standard on Hazardous Waste Cleanup Ac-
tivities.
See 1026
MEETINGS
Abstract Proceedings: Forum on Innovative
Hazardous Waste Treatment Technologies;
Domestic and International (2nd). Held in
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania on May 15-17,
1990.
See 1186
Abstract Proceedings: Superfund Technical
Support Project General Meeting. Held in
Athens, Georgia on December 3-6, 1990.
See 1187
Annual RREL Research Symposium (20th)
Abstract Proceedings. Held in Cincinnati,
Ohio on March 15-17,1994.
See 1184
Forum on Innovative Hazardous Waste
Treatment Technologies: Domestic and
International. Held in Atlanta, Georgia on
June 19-21, 1989. Abstract Proceedings.
See 1252
Forum on Innovative Hazardous Waste
Treatment Technologies: Domestic and
International. Held in Atlanta, Georgia on
June 19-21,1989. Technical Papers.
See 1253
Forum on Innovative Hazardous Waste
Treatment Technologies (3rd): Domestic and
International. Held in Dallas, Texas on June
11-13, 1991. Technical Papers.
See 1254
Immobilization Technology Seminar: Speaker
Slide Copies and Supporting Information.
See 1555
International Conference on New Frontiers
for Hazardous Waste Management (Third)
Proceedings. Held in Pittsburgh, Pennsylva-
nia on September 10-13, 1989.
See 1278
International Symposium on Field Screening
Methods for Hazardous Wastes and Toxic
Chemicals (2nd), Proceedings. Held in Las
Vegas, Nevada on February 12-14,1991.
See 1279
Meeting Summary: National Advisory Council
on Environmental Policy and Technology
(1st). Subcommittee on Radiation Cleanup
Regulation. Held in Washington, DC. on Oc-
tober 18-19, 1993.
See 1059
NACEPT Meeting. Held in Crystal City, Vir-
ginia on February 11,1994.
See 0144
Physical/Chemical Treatment of Hazardous
Waste Sites: Speaker Slide Copies and Sup-
porting Information.
See 1287
Presentations EPA-State Soil Standards
Conference. Held in Crystal City, Virginia on
January 29, 1991.
See 1524
Quantifying Effects in Ecological Site As-
sessments: Biological and Statistical Consid-
erations.
See 1063
Remedial Action, Treatment, and Disposal of
Hazardous Waste. Proceedings of the
Annual Hazardous Waste Research Sympo-
sium (17th). Held in Cincinnati, Ohio on April
9-11, 1991.
See 1135
Potential Surrogate Metals for Incinerator
Trial Burns.
See 1486
Superfund Engineering Issue: Treatment of
Lead-Contaminated Soils.
See 1535
Superfund: EPA/ICMA Superfund Revitaliza-
tion Conference. Held in Chicago, Illinois on
November 12-13, 1992.
See 0319
Superfund: EPA/ICMA Superfund Revitaliza-
tion Conference. Held in San Francisco,
California on February 1-2, 1993.
See 0320
Superfund Policy Forum Update, Volume 1,
Number 1, February 1992.
See 0324
Superfund: Report of the EPA Superfund
Revitalization Public Meeting Held on June
24,1992. Volumes 1 and 2.
See 0333
MEMBRANES
Membrane Treatment of Wood Preserving
Site Groundwater by SBP Technologies, Inc.
Applications Analysis Report.
See 1468
SITE Program Demonstration of the SBP
Technologies, Inc., Membrane Filtration
System on Creosote-Contaminated Water.
See 1592
MERCURY (METAL)
Emerging Technologies: Bio-Recovery Sys-
tems Removal and Recovery of Metal Ions
from Groundwater.
See 1439
Emerging Technologies: Bio-Recovery Sys-
tems Removal and Recovery of Metal Ions
from Groundwater. Appendices.
See 1440
Extraction of Mercury from Groundwater
Using Immobilized Algae.
See 1450
METAL INDUSTRY
Draft Record of Decision for the Aluminum
Smelter Conservation/Modernization Pro-
gram.
See 1087
METAL PARTITIONING
Potential Surrogate Metals for Incinerator
Trial Burns.
See 1486
Superfund Engineering Issue: Considerations
for Evaluating the Impact of Metals Partition-
ing during the Incineration of Contaminated
Soils from Superfund Sites.
See 1534
METALS
Emerging Technology Report: Metals Treat-
ment at Superfund Sites by Absorptive Filtra-
tion.
See 1232
Metals Testing Report: Metal Content of En-
vironmental Samples from Region 4.
See 1282
Pilot-Scale Incineration of Contaminated Soil
from the Chemical Insecticide Corporation
Superfund Site.
See 1523
Filtration of Ground Water Samples for
Metals Analysis.
See 1454
New Methods for Modeling the Transport of
Metals from Mineral Processing Wastes into
Surface Waters.
See 1590
SU-47
-------
METHANE
SUBJECT INDEX
Superfund Engineering Issue: Considerations
(or Evaluating the impact of Metals Partition-
ing during the Incineration of Contaminated
Soils from Superfund Sites.
• See 1534
Toxtelly Btoassay and Eluate~ Heavy Metals
jl .Analysis Results of the Bench Scale Stabili-
zation Study of Soils from the United
dhrom* Superfund rM. (National Priority
List) Site Corvailis, Oregon.
See 1546
METHANE
CERCLA Removal Actions at Methane Re-
loase Sftes.
Saa 0416
METHYL ETHYL KETONE
: Wealth Effects Assessment for Methyl Ethyl
Kotons.
Sea 1042
METHYL ISOCYANATE
Superfund Guide: Reportable Quantity Ad-
justment for Methyl Isocyanate (MIC).
Sea 1152
MICHIGAN
National Priorities List Sites: Michigan.
Sea 0211
National Priorities List Sites: Michigan.
Sea Q212
National Priorities Ust Sites: Michigan, 1992.
Saa 0213
Sit* Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Michigan.
Stta Enforoemeni Tracking System (SETS):
FRP Listing by Sle for Michigan.
Soe 0682
Sits Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Michigan.
See 0683
MICRO-COMPUTER AIDED COST
ENGINEERING SYSTEM '
:: Cost Estimating Systems for Remedial
Action Projects.
See 1123
HICROFILTRATION
DuPont/Oberlln Mlcroflltratton Technology.
Applications Analysis Report.
•".Sff 1584
" Demonstration of Mfcrbflltration Technology.
So* 1228
Technology Demonstration Summary,
; DuPont/Oberlln Mterofiltration System, Pal-
rrwrton, Pennsylvania. April-May 1992.
Saa 1336
Technology Evaluation Report SITE Pro-
gram Demonstration of the DuPont/Oberlin
Mtcroflilration Technology.
See 1350
MICROORGANISMS
Site Emerging Technologies: Bioscrubber for
, Removing Hazardous Organic Emissions
i from Soil, Water and Air Decontamination
Processes.
See 1302
; ..... U^B of Office ..... of Research and Develpp-
ii ' ..... mont's "Bloremediation1 ........ Expertise "in' Super-
fund Removal Program.
See 1016
MICROORGANISMS CONTROL (WATER)
In situ Bforemediatton of Contaminated Un-
saturatod Subsurface Soils.
See 1509
MILITARY BASE CLOSINGS
;; Mftary Base Closures: Guidance on EPA
Concurrence in the Identification of Unconta-
minatod Parcels under CERCLA Section
Sao 0899
MIUTARY FACILITIES
Future Land Use Scenarios for Federal Fa-
cilities.
See 0897
MINE WASTES
Application of a Water Quality Assessment
Modeling System at a Superfund Site.
See 1573
Consideration of RCRA Requirements in
Performing CERCLA Responses at Mining
Waste Sites.
See 0420
Mining Sites on the National Priorities List:
NPL Site Summary Reports. Volume 1 (Alu-
minum Company of America (Vancouver
Smelter) to Cleveland Mill).
See 0350
Mining Sites on the National Priorities List:
NPL Site Summary Reports. Volume 2
(Commencement Bay Nearshore/Tideflats to
Kerr McGee) (Kress Creek, Reed-Keppler
Park, Residential Areas, Sewage Treatment
Plant).
See 0351
Mining Sites on the National Priorities List:
NPL Site Summary Reports. Volume 3 (Kerr-
McGee Chemical Corp. (Soda Springs Plant)
to Ormet Corp).
See 0352
Mining Sites on the National Priorities List:
NPL Site Summary Reports. Volume 4
(Oronogo-Duenweg Mining Belt to Tar
Creek).
See 0353
Mining Sites on the National Priorities List:
NPL Site Summary Reports. Volume 5 (Tele-
dyne Wah Chang to Wayne Interim Storage
Facility/W.R. Grace).
See 0354
New Methods for Modeling the Transport of
Metals from Mineral Processing Wastes into
Surface Waters.
See 1590
MINERAL PROCESSING WASTES
Superfund Guide to RCRA Management Re-
quirements for Mineral Processing Wastes.
See 0439
MINING
Evaluating Amphibian Responses in Wet-
lands Impacted by Mining Activities in the
Western United States.
See 1586
Superfund Guide to RCRA Management Re-
quirements for Mineral Processing Wastes.
See 0439
MINNESOTA
National Priorities List Sites: Minnesota.
See 0214
National Priorities List Sites: Minnesota.
See 0215
National Priorities List Sites: Minnesota,
1992.
See 0216
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Minnesota.
See 0684
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Minnesota.
See 0685
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Minnesota.
See 0686
MISSISSIPPI
National Priorities List Sites: Mississippi.
See 0217
National Priorities List Sites: Mississippi.
See 0218
National Priorities List Sites: Mississippi,
1992.
See 0219
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Mississippi.
See 0687
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Mississippi.
See 0688
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Mississippi.
See 0689
MISSOURI
National Priorities List Sites: Missouri.
See 0220
National Priorities List Sites: Missouri.
See 0221
National Priorities List Sites: Missouri, 1992.
See 0222
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Missouri.
See 0690
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Missouri.
See 0691
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Missouri.
See 0692
MOBILE EQUIPMENT
Mobile Incineration: An Analysis of the In-
dustry.
See 1480
MODEL STUDIES
Ground-Water Modeling Compendium.
Model Fact Sheets, Descriptions, Applica-
tions and Assessment Framework.
See 1458
MODELS
Instructional Package on Regulatory Air
Quality Modeling. Part 1: Videos on the
'Guideline on Air Quality Models (Revised)'
and the Model Clearinghouse (Video).
See 1412
MODELS-SIMULATION
Preliminary Ranking Evaluation Score
(PREscore) Version 1.1 (for Microcomput-
ers).
See 0372
Preliminary Ranking Evaluation Score
(PREscore) Version 2.0 (for Microcomput-
ers).
See 0373
MODULAR ORIENTED UNCERTAINTY
SYSTEM
AutoMOUSE: An Improvement to the
MOUSE Computerized Uncertainty Analysis
System Operational Manual.
See 1201
MONITORING
Guidance on Applying the Data Quality Ob-
jectives Process for Ambient Air Monitoring
Around Superfund Sites (Stage 3).
See 0987
Guidance on Applying the Data Quality Ob-
jectives Process for Ambient Air Monitoring
Around Superfund Sites (Stages 1 and 2).
See 0988
Inorganic Contract Compliance Screening
System (ICCSS) Software (for Microcomput-
ers).
See 0034
Inorganic Contract Compliance Screening
System (ICCSS) Software for the PC (Ver-
sion 3/90) User Manual.
See 0035
Organic Contract Compliance Screening
System (OCCSS) Software (for Microcom-
puters).
See 0047
SU-48
-------
SUBJECT INDEX
NATIONAL PRIORITIES LIST
Organic Contract Compliance Screening
System (OCCSS) Software for the PC (Ver-
sion 2/90) User Manual.
See 0048
MONMOUTH (NEW JERSEY)
Evaluation of Waste Stabilized by the Solidi-
tech SITE Technology.
See 1554
MONONGAHELA RIVER
OPA Update: Implementation of the Oil Pol-
lution Act of 1990. Volume 2, Number 1
See 0934
MONTANA
National Priorities List Sites: Montana
See 0223
National Priorities List Sites: Montana.
See 0224
National Priorities List Sites: Montana, 1992
See 0225
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Montana.
See 0693
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Montana.
See 0694
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)-
PRP Listing by Site for Montana.
See 0695
MUNICIPAL SETTLEMENT POLICY
Municipal Settlements.
See 0583
MUNICIPAL WASTES
Municipal Settlements.
See 0583
Report to Congress: Settlements with Munic-
ipal Waste Generators and Transporters
Since 1991 under the Comprehensive Envi-
ronmental Response, Compensation, and Li-
ability Act of 1980.
See 0596
Streamlining the RI/FS for CERCLA Munici-
pal Landfill Sites.
See 1119
Superfund Desk Reference for Municipali-
ties.
See 0486
MUNICIPALITIES
Conducting Remedial Investigations/Feasi-
bility Studies for CERCLA Municipal Landfill
Sites.
See 1084
Superfund Accelerated Cleanup Bulletin.
Volume 1, Number 1. Presumptive Remedies
for Municipal Landfill Sites.
See 0117
MUTAGENICITY TESTS
Evaluation of Exposure Markers.
See 1246
Using the DNA Alkaline Unwinding Assay to
Detect DNA Damage in Laboratory and Envi-
ronmentally Exposed Cells and Tissues.
See 1368
MUTAGENS
Application of a Plant Test System in the
Identification of Potential Genetic Hazards at
Chemical Waste Sites.
See 1194
NAPHTHALENE
Health Effects Assessment for Naphthalene.
See 1044
NATIONAL CONTINGENCY PLAN
CERCLA Compliance with Other Laws
Manual: CERCLA Compliance with State Re-
quirements.
See 0405
National Oil and Hazardous Substances Pol-
lution Contingency Plan (as Published in the
Federal Register, March 8,1990).
See 0145
NATIONAL GOVERNMENT
Progress Toward Implementing Superfund.
Fiscal Year 1988.
See 0299
Progress Toward Implementing Superfund.
Fiscal Year 1989.
See 0300
NATIONAL PRIORITIES LIST
Accelerated Response at NPL Sites Guid-
ance (Superfund Management Review: Rec-
ommendation No. 22).
See 0082
Authorization for Regional Administrators to
Approve Consistency Exemptions at NPL
Sites.
See 0998
Closing the NPL Book under the Original
HRS.
See 0337
Discussions with the Public Concerning NPL
Listings.
See 0339
FACT BOOK: National Priorities List under
the Original Hazard Ranking System, 1981-
1991.
See 0340
Guidance on Setting Priorities for NPL Can-
didate Sites.
See 0344
Mining Sites on the National Priorities List:
NPL Site Summary Reports. Volume 1 (Alu-
minum Company of America (Vancouver
Smelter) to Cleveland Mill).
See 0350
Mining Sites on the National Priorities List
NPL Site Summary Reports. Volume 2
(Commencement Bay Nearshore/Tideflats to
Kerr McGee) (Kress Creek, Reed-Keppler
Park, Residential Areas, Sewage Treatment
Plant).
See 0351
Mining Sites on the National Priorities List:
NPL Site Summary Reports. Volume 3 (Kerr-
McGee Chemical Corp. (Soda Springs. Plant)
to Ormet Corp).
See 0352
Mining Sites on the National Priorities List:
NPL Site Summary Reports. Volume 4
(Oronogo-Duenweg Mining Belt to Tar
Creek).
See 0353
Mining Sites on the National Priorities List:
NPL Site Summary Reports. Volume 5 (Tele-
dyne Wah Chang to Wayne Interim Storage
Facility/W.R. Grace).
See 0354
National Priorities List Sites: Alabama.
See 0149
National Priorities List Sites: Alabama, 1992.
See 0150
National Priorities List Sites: Alaska.
See 0152
National Priorities List Sites: Alaska, 1992.
See 0153
National Priorities List Sites: American
Samoa, Guam, and the Trust Territories.
See 0154
National Priorities List Sites: Arizona and
Nevada.
See 0157
National Priorities List Sites: Arizona and
Nevada, 1992.
See 0158
National Priorities List Sites: Arkansas.
See 0160
National Priorities List Sites: Arkansas, 1992.
See 0161
National Priorities List Sites: California and
Hawaii.
See 0163
National Priorities List Sites: California and
Hawaii, 1992.
See 0164
National Priorities List Sites: Colorado.
See 0166
National Priorities List Sites: Colorado, 1992.
See 0167
National Priorities List Sites: Connecticut.
See 0169
National Priorities List Sites: Connecticut,
1992.
See 0170
National Priorities List Sites: Delaware.
See 0172
National Priorities List Sites: Delaware, 1992.
See 0173
National Priorities List Sites: Florida.
See 0175
National Priorities List Sites: Florida, 1992.
See 0176
National Priorities List Sites: Georgia.
See 0178
National Priorities List Sites: Georgia, 1992.
See 0179
National Priorities List Sites: Idaho.
See 0182
National Priorities List Sites: Idaho, 1992.
See 0183
National Priorities List Sites: Illinois.
See 0185
National Priorities List Sites: Illinois, 1992.
See 0186
National Priorities List Sites: Indiana.
See 0188
National Priorities List Sites: Indiana, 1992.
See 0189
National Priorities List Sites: Iowa.
See 0191
National Priorities List Sites: Iowa, 1992.
See 0192
National Priorities List Sites: Kansas. '
See 0194
National Priorities List Sites: Kansas, 1992.
See 0195
National Priorities List Sites: Kentucky.
See 0197
National Priorities List Sites: Kentucky, 1992.
See 0198
National Priorities List Sites: Louisiana.
See 0200
National Priorities List Sites: Louisiana, 1992.
See 0201
National Priorities List Sites: Maine.
See 0203
National Priorities List Sites: Maine, 1992.
See 0204
National Priorities List Sites: Maryland.
See 0206
National Priorities List Sites: Maryland, 1992.
See 0207
National Priorities List Sites: Massachusetts.
See 0209
National Priorities List Sites: Massachusetts,
1992.
See 0210
National Priorities List Sites: Michigan.
See 0212
National Priorities List Sites: Michigan, 1992.
See 0213
National Priorities List Sites: Minnesota.
See 0215
National Priorities List Sites: Minnesota,
1992.
See 0216
SU-49
-------
NATIONAL PRIORITY LIST
SUBJECT INDEX
• National Priorities List Sites: Mississippi.
See 0218
National Priorities Ust Sites: Mississippi,
1992.
Sea 0219
National Priorities Ust Sites: Missouri.
See 0221
National Priorities Ust Sites: Missouri, 1992.
See 0222
National Priorities Ust Sites: Montana.
Soft 0224
National Priorities Ust Sites: Montana, 1992.
S090225
1 National Priorities Ust Sites: Nebraska.
See 0227
National Priorities Ust Sites: Nebraska,
1992.
Sea 0228
National Priorities Ust Sites: New Hamp-
; shire. ...............
Sea 0230
•••• National Priorities Ust Sites: New Hamp-
i»" shire, 1992.
Sea 0231
National Priorities Ust Sites: New Jersey.
Sea 0233
National Priorities Ust Sites: New Jersey,
1992.
Se* 0234
I;: National Priorities Ust Sites: New Mexico.
See 0236
National Priorities Ust Sites: New Mexico,
...... 1992.
'-'See 0237,
1! ,' National Priorities'Ust Sites: New York.
'. See 0239 ...................
National Priorities Ust Sites: New York,
1992.
See 0240
National Priorities Ust Sites: North and
South Dakota, 1992.
See 0242
' National Priorities" List" Sites: North Carolina.
See 0244
National Priorities Ust Sites: North Carolina,
1992.
See 0245
National Priorities Ust Sites: North Dakota
and South Dakota.
See 0246
National Priorities Ust Sites: Ohio.
See 0248
National Priorities Ust Sites: Ohio, 1992.
See 0249
;;; National Priorities Ust Sites: Oklahoma.
See 0251
National Priorities Ust Sites: Oklahoma,
............
Sea 0252
National Priorities Ust Sites: Oregon.
See 0254
National Priorities Ust Sites: Oregon, 1992.
See 0255
National Priorities Ust Sites: Pennsylvania.
Sea 0257
National Priorities Ust Sites: Pennsylvania,
1992.
Sea 0258
National Priorities Ust Sites: Puerto Rico.
See 0260
National "Priorities Ust Sites: Puerto Rico and
Virgin Islands, 1992.
See 0261
National Priorities Ust Sites: Rhode Island.
Sea 0263
National Priorities List Sites: Rhode Island,
1992.
See 0264
National Priorities Ust Sites Set (1 991 ).
See 0265
National Priorities List Sites: South Carolina.
See 0267
National Priorities List Sites: South Carolina,
1992.
See 0268
National Priorities Ust Sites: Tennessee.
See 0270
National Priorities List Sites: Tennessee,
1992.
See 0271
National Priorities List Sites: Texas.
See 0273
National Priorities List Sites: Texas, 1992.
See 0274
National Priorities Ust Sites: The United
States Territories, 1992.
See 0275
National Priorities Ust Sites: Utah.
See 0277
National Priorities Ust Sites: Utah, 1992.
See 0278
National Priorities Ust Sites: Vermont.
See 0280
National Priorities Ust Sites: Vermont, 1992.
See 0281
National Priorities Ust Sites: Virginia.
See 0283
National Priorities List Sites: Virginia, 1992.
See 0284
National Priorities Ust Sites: Washington.
See 0286
National Priorities List Sites: Washington,
1992.
See 0287
National Priorities List Sites: West Virginia.
See 0289
National Priorities List Sites: West Virginia,
1992.
See 0290
National Priorities List Sites: Wisconsin.
See 0292
National Priorities List Sites: Wisconsin,
1992.
See 0293
National Priorities List Sites: Wyoming.
See 0295
National Priorities List Sites: Wyoming, 1992.
See 0296
NPL Characterization Project: National Re-
sults.
See 0355
NPL Characterization Project: Region 1 Re-
sults.
See 0356
NPL Characterization Project: Region 3 Re-
sults.
See 0357
NPL Characterization Project: Region 4 Re-
sults.
See 0358
NPL Characterization Project: Region 5 Re-
sults.
See 0359
NPL Characterization Project: Region 6 Re-
sults.
See 0360
NPL Characterization Project: Region 7 Re-
sults.
See 0361
NPL Characterization Project: Region 8 Re-
sults.
See 0362
NPL Characterization Project: Region 9 Re-
sults.
See 0363
NPL Characterization Project: Region 10 Re-
sults.
See 0364
Regional Quality Control Guidance for NPL
Candidate Sites.
See 0376
Superfund: Focusing on the Nation at Large.
A Decade of Progress at National Priorities
List Sites.
See 0322
Superfund: Focusing on the Nation at Large.
1991 Update.
See 0323
NATIONAL PRIORITY LIST
NPL Construction Completion Definition at
Bioremediation and Soil Vapor Extraction
Sites.
See 0365
NATURAL RESOURCE TRUSTEES
ECO Update. Volume 1, Number 3. The
Role of Natural Resource Trustees in the
Superfund Process.
See 1021
NEBRASKA
National Priorities List Sites: Nebraska.
See 0226
National Priorities List Sites: Nebraska.
See 0227
National Priorities List Sites: Nebraska,
1992.
See 0228
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Nebraska.
See 0696
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Nebraska.
See 0697
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Nebraska.
See 0698
NEVADA
National Priorities List Sites: Arizona and
Nevada.
See 0156
National Priorities List Sites: Arizona and
Nevada.
See 0157
National Priorities List Sites: Arizona and
Nevada, 1992.
See 0158
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Nevada.
See 0699
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Nevada.
See 0700
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Nevada.
See 0701
NEW BEDFORD HARBOR
Applications Analysis Report: SITE Program,
CF Systems Organics Extraction System,
New Bedford, Massachusetts.
See 1196
Framework for Real-Time Decision-Making:
New Bedford Harbor Pilot Dredging Study.
See 1587
Development and Use of Site-Specific
Chemical and Biological Criteria for Assess-
ing New Bedford Harbor Pilot Dredging
Project.
See 1583
NEW CASTLE COUNTY (DELAWARE)
Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Clean-
up Efforts Nationwide, Spring 1993 (Harvey
and Knott Drum Site, New Castle County,
Delaware).
See 0956
SU-50
-------
SUBJECT INDEX
NOTIFICATION PROCEDURES
NEW CASTLE (DELAWARE)
Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Clean-
up Efforts Nationwide, Summer 1993 (Army
Creek Landfill Site Profile, New Castle Dela-
ware).
See 0962
NEW HAMPSHIRE
National Priorities List Sites: New Hamp-
shire.
See 0229
National Priorities List Sites: New Hamp-
shire. K
See 0230
National Priorities List Sites: New Hamp-
shire, 1992.
See 0231
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)-
PRP Listing by Site for New Hampshire.
See 0702
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)-
PRP Listing by Site for New Hampshire.
See 0703
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)-
PRP Listing by Site for New Hampshire.
See 0704
NEW JERSEY
National Priorities List Sites: New Jersey
See 0232 y
National Priorities List Sites: New Jersey
See 0233
National Priorities List Sites: New Jersey
1992.
See 0234
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)-
PRP Listing by Site for New Jersey
See 0705
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)-
PRP Listing by Site for New Jersey
See 0706
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)-
PRP Listing by Site for New Jersey.
See 0707 y
NEW MEXICO
National Priorities List Sites: New Mexico.
See 0235
National Priorities List Sites: New Mexico
See 0236
National Priorities List Sites: New Mexico
1992.
See 0237
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)-
PRP Listing by Site for New Mexico.
See 0708
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)-
PRP Listing by Site for New Mexico.
See 0709
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)-
PRP Listing by Site for New Mexico
See 0710
NEW YORK
National Priorities List Sites: New York
See 0238
National Priorities List Sites: New York.
See 0239
National Priorities List Sites: New York
1992.
See 0240
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)-
PRP Listing by Site for New York.
See 0711
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)-
PRP Listing by Site for New York.
See 0712
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)-
PRP Listing by Site for New York
See 0713
Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Clean-
up Efforts Nationwide, Spring 1993 (Radium
Chemical Site Profile, Queens, New York)
See 0959
NEWS MEDIA
Tech Trends Number 3, December 1990
See 1325
Tech Trends Number 4, March 1991.
See 1326
Tech Trends Number 9, June 1992
See 1329
NEWSLETTERS
Forum Focus, August 1993.
See 0136
NICKEL
Acid Volatile Sulfide Predicts the Acute Tox-
icity of Cadmium and Nickel in Sediments
See 1572
NITRO (WEST VIRGINIA)
Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Clean-
up Efforts Nationwide, Summer 1993 (Fike/
Artel Chemical Site Profile, Nitro, West Vir-
ginia).
See 0967
NONBINDING PRELIMINARY ALLOCATIONS
OF RESPONSIBILITY
Interim Guidelines for Preparing Nonbinding
Preliminary Allocations of Responsibility.
See 0564
NORTH CAROLINA
National Priorities List Sites: North Carolina
See 0243
National Priorities List Sites: North Carolina
See 0244
National Priorities List Sites: North Carolina,
1992.
See 0245
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)-
PRP Listing by Site for North Carolina.
See 0714
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for North Carolina.
See 0715
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for North Carolina.
See 0716
NORTH DAKOTA
National Priorities List Sites: North and
South Dakota.
See 0241
National Priorities List Sites: North and
South Dakota, 1992.
See 0242
National Priorities List Sites: North Dakota
and South Dakota.
See 0246
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)-
PRP Listing by Site for North Dakota.
See 0717
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)-
PRP Listing by Site for North Dakota.
See 0718
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)-
PRP Listing by Site for North Dakota.
See 0719
NORTHERN REGION (IDAHO)
Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Clean-
up Efforts Nationwide, Fall 1993 (Bunker Hill
Site Profile, Silver Valley, Northern Idaho)
See 0951
NOTIFICATION PROCEDURES
Final Guidance on Preparing Waste-In Lists
and Volumetric Rankings for Release to Po-
tentially Responsible Parties (PRPs) under
CERCLA ('Waste-In' Guidance).
See 0542
Model Informational Notice Letter to Local
Governments.
See 0575
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)-
Frequency by Party Name Report.
See 0609
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)-
PRP Listing by Site for Alabama.
See 0623
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for American Samoa.
See 0626
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Arizona.
See 0629
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Arkansas.
See 0632
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for California.
See 0635
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Colorado.
See 0638
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Connecticut.
See 0641
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Delaware.
See 0644
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Florida.
See 0647
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Georgia.
See 0650
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Idaho.
See 0653
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Illinois.
See 0656
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Indiana.
See 0659
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Iowa.
See 0662
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Kansas.
See 0665
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Kentucky.
See 0668
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)-
PRP Listing by Site for Louisiana.
See 0671
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)-
PRP Listing by Site for Maine.
See 0674
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Maryland.
See 0677
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Massachusetts.
See 0680
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)-
PRP Listing by Site for Michigan.
See 0683
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Minnesota.
See 0686
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Mississippi.
See 0689
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Missouri.
See 0692
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)-
PRP Listing by Site for Montana.
See 0695
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)-
PRP Listing by Site for Nebraska.
See 0698
SU-51
-------
OClSS (ORGANIC CONTRACT COMPLIANCE
SCREENING SYSTEM)
SUBJECT INDEX
Site Enforcement tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Nevada.
Sea 0701
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Ustlng by Site for New Hampshire.
Soa 0704
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for New Jersey.
Soa 0707
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
, PflP Listing by Site for New Mexico.
See 0710
Site Enforcement'Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing fay Site for New York.
Sea 0713
[Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
! PRP Listing by Site for North Carolina.
S«e 0716
SHo Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
in PRP Listing by Site for North Dakota.
See 0719
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
- Pftt* Listing by Site for Northern Marianas.
See 0722
Site Enforcement tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Ohio.
See 0725
: Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
= PRP Listing by Site for Oklahoma.
See 0728
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Oregon.
See 0731
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Pennsylvania.
See 0734
:;: Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
iii PRP Listing by Site for Puerto Rico.
See 0737
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
i! PRP Listing by Site for Rhode Island.
See 0789
SHe Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for South Carolina.
See 0792
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for South Dakota.
Soa 0795
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Tennessee.
See 0790
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Texas.
!:::: see 0601
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Trust Territories.
Sea 0804
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Utah.
Sea 0807
/Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Vermont
See 0810
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Virginia.
Sen 0812 r_re,x
Sita Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Washington.
See 0815
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for West Virginia.
See 0818
SHe Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Wisconsin.
See 0821
i Slta Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Wyoming.
See 0824
Site Enforcement tracking System (SETS):
':: PPP National Dsting Alphabetically by Party
Name.
See 0828
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP National Listing by Site.
See 0834
OCCSS (ORGANIC CONTRACT COMPLIANCE
SCREENING SYSTEM)
Organic Contract Compliance Screening
System (OCCSS) Software (OLM01.8 Ver-
sion 4) (for Microcomputers).
See 0051
OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURE
Effect of OSHA's Bloodborne Pathogens
Standard on Hazardous Waste Cleanup Ac-
tivities.
See 1026
Personal Air Sampling and Air Monitoring
Requirements under 29 CFR 1910.120.
See 0922
OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH
Establishing Work Zones at Uncontrolled
Hazardous Waste Sites.
See 0908
Field Applications of Robotic Systems in
Hazardous Environments, p1-29 1993. See
also PB86-176344 and PB92-166743.
See 1251
Reid Standard Operating Procedures for Air
Surveillance F.S.O.P. No. 8.
See 0910
Field Standard Operating Procedures for Es-
tablishing Work Zones (F.S.O.P. 6).
See 0911
Field Standard Operating Procedures for
Preparation of a Site Safety Plan F.S.O.P.
No. 9.
See 0912
Field Standard Operating Procedures for the
Decontamination of Response Personnel
F.S.O.P. No. 7.
See 0913
Guidelines for the Cleanup of Clandestine
Drug Laboratories.
See 1007
Hazardous Waste Operations and Emergen-
cy Response: Uncontrolled Hazardous
Waste Sites and RCRA Corrective Actions.
See 0425
Hazardous Waste Operations and Emergen-
cy Response: RCRA TSD and Emergency
Response Without Regard to Location.
See 0914
Health and Safety Audit Guidelines: SARA
Title I, Section 126.
See 0918
Health and Safety Plan (HASP) User's Guide
(Version 3.0/4.0).
See 0917
Health Effects Assessment for Benzene.
See 1035
Health Effects Assessment for Cadmium.
See 1036
Health Effects Assessment for Carbon Tet-
rachloride.
See 1037
Health Effects Assessment for Chlordane.
See 1038
Health Effects Assessment for Chloroben-
zene.
See 1039
Health Effects Assessment for Chloroform.
See 1040
Health Effects Assessment for DDT.
See 1041
Health Effects Assessment for Methyl Ethyl
Ketone.
See 1042
Health Effects Assessment for Methylene
Chloride.
See 1043
Health Effects Assessment for Naphthalene.
See 1044
Health Effects Assessment for Phenol.
See 1045
Health Effects Assessment for Styrene.
See 1046
Health Effects Assessment for Tetrachlor-
oethylene.
See 1047
Health Effects Assessment for Trichloroethy-
lene.
See 1048
Health Effects Assessment for Xylenes.
See 1049
Health Effects Assessment for 2,4,5-Trichlor-
ophenoxy Acetic Acid (2,4,5-T).
See 1050
OSWER Integrated Health and Safety Policy.
See 0920
OSWER Integrated Health and Safety Stand-
ard Operating Practices.
See 0921
Priority for Health and Safety Requirements,
Especially Medical Surveillance Require-
ments, for EPA Employees Who Support
OSWER Programs.
See 0923
Estimation of the Cost of Using Chemical
Protective Clothing.
See 1244
Personnel Protection through Reconnais-
sance Robotics at Superfund Remedial
Sites.
See 1286
Updated Health Effects Assessment for Ace-
tone.
See 1080
OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH
ADMINISTRATION
Standard Operating Safety Guides.
See 0924
OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND PROTECTION
Limited-Use Chemical Protective Clothing for
EPA Superfund Activities.
See 1058
OFFICE OF EMERGENCY AND REMEDIAL
RESPONSE
CERCLA Compliance with Other Environ-
mental Statutes.
See 0404
OFFICE OF SOLID WASTE AND EMERGENCY
RESPONSE
Accelerated Response at NPL Sites Guid-
ance (Superfund Management Review: Rec-
ommendation No. 22).
See 0082
Accelerating Potentially Responsible Party
Remedial Design Starts: Implementing the
30-Day Study.
See 0509
Administrative Order on Consent for Reme-
dial Investigations/Feasibility Study.
See 0510
Administrative Penalty Procedures.
See 0511
Advancing the Use of Treatment Technol-
ogies for Superfund Remedies.
See 1191
Amendment to Historical Definitions of NPL
Deletion Start and Completion Dates.
See 0335
Analysis of Treatability Data for Soil and
Debris: Evaluation of Land Ban Impact on
Use of Superfund Treatment Technologies.
See 1488
SU-52
-------
Applicability of Land Disposal Restrictions to
RCRA and CERCLA Ground Water Treat-
ment Reinjection Superfund Management
Review: Recommendation No. 26.
See 1430
Approval of Long Term Contracting Strategy
for Superfund (Superfund Management
Review: Recommendation E.2).
See 0018
ARAR's Q's and A's. Compliance with the
Toxicity Characteristics Rule. Part 1.
See 0396
ARARs Fact Sheet: Compliance with the
Clean Air Act and Associated Air Quality Re-
quirements.
See 0397
ARARs Q's and A's.
See 0398
ARARS Q's and A's: Compliance with Fed-
eral Water Quality Criteria.
See 0399
ARARs Q's and A's: General Policy, RCRA
CWA, SDWA, Post-ROD Information, and
Contingent Waivers.
See 0401
ARARs Q's and A's: State Ground-Water
Antidegradation Issues.
See 0402
ARARs Q's and A's: The Fund-Balancing
Waiver.
See 0403
Arbitration Procedures for Small Superfund
Cost Recovery Claims.
See 0512
ARCS Construction Contract Modification
Procedures.
See 0020
ARCS Work Assignment Management: Field
Guide.
See 0021
Assurance of Hazardous Waste Capacity
Guidance to State Officials. Assistance in
Fulfilling the Requirements of CERCLA
104(c)(9).
See 0129
Audits and the Superfund Program Manager
See 0086
Authority to Use CERCLA to Provide En-
forcement Funding Assistance to States.
See 0450
CERCLA Community Relations Mailing Lists.
See 0451
CERCLA Compliance with Other Laws
Manual: CERCLA Compliance with State Re-
quirements.
See 0405
CERCLA Compliance with Other Laws
Manual: CERCLA Compliance with the CWA
and SDWA.
See 0406
CERCLA Compliance with Other Laws
Manual: Guide to Manual.
See 0407
CERCLA Compliance with Other Laws
Manual: Overview of ARARs - Focus on
ARAR Waivers.
See 0408
CERCLA Compliance with Other Laws
Manual: RCRA ARARS-Focus on Closure
Requirements.
See 0410 :
CERCLA Compliance with Other Laws
Manual: Summary and Part 2. CAA, TSCA,
and Other Statutes.
See 0411
CERCLA Compliance with the RCRA Toxici-
ty Characteristics (TC) Rule: Part 2.
See 0412
SUBJECT INDEX
CERCLA Implementation of Inspector Train-
ing Requirements for OSCs/RPMs at the In-
termediate Level in STEP and First-Line Su-
pervisors.
See 0517
CERCLA Off-Site Policy - Eligibility of Facili-
ties in Assessment Monitoring.
See 0414
CERCLA Off-Site Policy: Providing Notice to
Facilities.
See 0415
CERCLA Removal Actions at Methane Re-
lease Sites.
See 0416
CERCLA Site Discharges to POTWS
CERCLA Site Sampling Program: Detailed
Data Report.
See 1575
CERCLA Site Discharges to POTWS Treat-
ability Manual.
See 1577
CERCLA Waste Capacity Assurance.
See 0131
CERCLIS Data Handling Support Policy
Statement.
See 0013
CERCLIS Listing.
See 0014
Chemical Dehalogenation Treatability Stud-
ies under CERCLA: An Overview.
See 1209
Citizen's Guide to Air Sparging.
See 0452
Citizen's Guide to Bioventing.
See 0453
Citizen's Guide to In situ Soil Flushing.
See 0456
Citizen's Guide to Innovative Treatment
Technologies for Contaminated Soils,
Sludges, Sediments and Debris.
See 0457
Citizen's Guide to Using Indigenous and Ex-
ogenous Microorganisms in Bioremediation.
. See 0461
Citizens' Guidance Manual for the Technical
Assistance Grant Program.
See 0462
Clarification of Delegation to Approve Con-
sistency Exemptions at NPL Sites.
See 0336
Closing the NPL Book under the Original
HRS.
See 0337
Community Relations during Enforcement
Activities and Development of the Adminis-
trative Record.
See 0466
Community Relations: Use of Senior Envi-
ronmental Employees in Superfund (Super-
fund Management Review: Recommendation
43.K.L).
See 0088
Comparative Analysis of Remedies Selected
in the Superfund Program during FY 87, FY
88 and FY 89.
See 0519
Compendium of ERT Air Sampling Proce-
dures.
See 0901
Compendium of ERT Field Analytical Proce-
dures.
See 0902
Congressional Limits for FY 92 Alternative
Remedial Contracting Strategy (ARCS) Pro-
gram Management Costs.
See 0022
Consent Orders and the Reimbursement
Provision Under Section 106(b) of CERCLA
See 0520
OFFICE OF SOLID WASTE
AND EMERGENCY RESPONSE
Consideration of RCRA Requirements in
Performing CERCLA Responses at Mining
Waste Sites.
See 0420
Considerations in Ground Water Remedi-
ation at Superfund Sites.
See 1436
Consultation on Records of Decision
(RODS) for Containment-Only Remedies.
See 0521
Control of Air Emissions from Superfund Air
Strippers at Superfund Groundwater Sites.
See 1399
Coordination of EPA and State Actions in
Cost Recovery.
See 0522
Cost Recovery Actions/Statute of Limita-
tions.
See 0523
Cost Recovery Actions under CERCLA.
See 0524
Cost Recovery Referrals.
See 0525
Counting State-Lead Enforcement NPL Sites
Toward the CERCLA Section 116(e) Reme-
dial Action Start Mandate.
See 0468
Criminal Investigations and the Superfund
Program.
See 0469
Decentralization of Superfund Bottle Reposi-
tory Functions.
See 0985
Discharge of Wastewater from CERCLA
Sites into POTWS.
See 0421
Endangerment Assessment Guidance.
See 0527
Endangerment Assessment Guidance.
See 0528
Endangerment Assessment Handbook.
See 0529
Entry and Continued Access under CERCLA.
See 0534
EPA Interim Guidance on Indemnification of
Superfund Response Action Contractors
Under Section 119 of SARA.
See 0536
EPA Oversight of Remedial Designs and Re-
medial Actions Performed by PRPs.
See 1124
EPA/U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Payment
Process, Direct Cite/Revised Reimburse-
ment Methods.
See 1125
EPA/USAGE Payment Process: Direct Cite/
Revised Reimbursement Methods.
See 1126
Establishing Work Zones at Uncontrolled
Hazardous Waste Sites.
See 0908
Evaluation of, and Additional Guidance on,
Issuance of Unilateral Administrative Orders
(UAOs) for RD/RA.
See 0538
Exemptions from the Statutory Limits on Re-
moval Actions.
See 1002
Exercising Flexibility through the Superfund
Accelerated Cleanup Model (SACM).
See 0091
Expanded Civil Judicial Referral Procedures.
See 0539
Expansion of Direct Referral of Cases to the
Department of Justice.
See 0540
Expediting Remedial Construction.
See 1127
SU-53
-------
OFFICE OF SOLID WASTE
AND EMERGENCY RESPONSE
fxtending the Tracking of Analytical Serv-
ices to Potentially Responsible Party-Lead
Soporfund Sites (Supplemental Guidance on
OSWER Directive 9240.0-2A).
See 0906
Feasibility Study: Detailed Analysis of Reme-
dial Action Alternatives.
See 1083
Feasibility Study: Development and Screen-
Ing o( Remedial Action Alternatives.
Saa 1089
Field Standard Operating Procedures for Air
Surveillance F.S.O.P. No. 8.
See 0910
Field Standard Operating Procedures for Es-
tablishing Work Zones (F.S.O.P. 6).
See 0911
FteW Standard Operating Procedures for
Preparation of a Site Safety Plan F.S.O.P.
No. 9.
SC90912
Ftold Standard Operating Procedures for the
Decontamination of Response Personnel
F.S.O.P. No. 7.
See 0913
I Final EPA Policy on the Inclusion of Environ-
montal Auditing Provisions in Enforcement
Settlements.
Sea 0541
Ftnal Guidance on Administrative Records
for Selecting CERCLA Response Actions.
Sa«0473
I Final Guidance on Implementation of the
' ^Consistency' Exemption to the Statutory
Limits on Removal Actions.
S«*1004
i Final Guidance on Preparing Waste-In Lists
| and Volumetric Rankings for Release to Po-
! Jentfafiy Responsible Parties (PRPs) under
CERCLA fWasta-In1 Guidance).
Sao 0542
' Final Policy on Setting Ri/FS Priorities.
! Sea 1090
; First iiS Da Minimis Settlements: Statistics
:' from EPA's De Minimis Database.
Sea 0543
Funding of State Enforcement Related Ac-
: ttritfes.
Sea 0474
I Furthoring the Use of Innovative Treatment
| Technologies In OSWER Programs.
Sea 1255
: FY 1992 Themes for Regional Coordination
• to Support Continuous improvements of Su-
porlund's Remedial Program.
Sea 1091
Getting Ready: Scoping the Rl/FS.
Sea 1092
; Guidance for Coordinating ATSDR Health
Assessment Activities with the Superfund
Remedial Process.
See 1029
;;,"' Guidance for Data Useability in Risk Assess-
" nrwnt
See 1031
Guidance for Environmental Priorities Initia-
• live (EPI) Facilities in the Superfund Pre-Re-
• modial Program.
Soa0341
Guidance for Organizing ARCS Contract
;: Fttes.
See 002S
Guidance of the Use of Stipulated Penalties
In Hazardous Waste Consent Decrees.
SC90544
Guidance on Applicability of EPA Order
3500.1 to CERCLA Staff.
S»a0545
!i! Guidance on CERCLA Section 106 Judicial
Actions.
';•„ Sea 0546 ," '_
SU-54
SUBJECT INDEX
Guidance on CERCLA 106(a) Unilateral Ad-
ministrative Orders for Remedial Designs
and Remedial Actions.
See 0548
Guidance on Documenting Decisions Not to
Take Cost Recovery Actions.
See 0549
Guidance on Drafting Consent Decrees in
Hazardous Waste Cases.
See 0550
Guidance on Federal Superfund Liens.
See 0551
Guidance on Implementation of the Super-
fund Accelerated Cleanup Model (SACM)
under CERCLA and the NCP.
See 0094
Guidance on Landowner Liability under Sec-
tion 107{a)(1) of CERCLA, De Minimis Set-
tlements under Section 122(g)(1)(B) of
CERCLA, and Settlements with Prospective
Purchasers of Contaminated Property.
See 0552
Guidance on Oversight of Potentially Re-
sponsible Party Remedial Investigations and
Feasibility Studies. Volume 1.
See 1094
Guidance on Oversight of Potentially Re-
sponsible Party Remedial Investigations and
Feasibility Studies. Volume 2. Appendices.
See 1095
Guidance on Oversight of PRP Performed
RD/RA.
See 1130
Guidance on Premium Payments in CERCLA
Settlements.
See 0553
Guidance on Preparing Waste-in Lists and
Volumetric Rankings for Release to Poten-
tially Responsible Parties (PRPs) under
CERCLA.
See 0554
Guidance on Procedures for Submitting
CERCLA Section 106(b) Reimbursement Pe-
titions and on EPA Review of Those Peti-
tions.
See 0555
Guidance on Program Management Activi-
ties under ARCS.
See 0026
Guidance Regarding CERCLA Enforcement
against Bankrupt Parties.
See 0556
Guide for Conducting Treatability Studies
under CERCLA: Aerobic Biodegradation
Remedy Screening.
See 1156
Guide for Conducting Treatability Studies
under CERCLA: Aerobic Biodegradation
Remedy Screening. Quick Reference Fact
Sheet.
See 1158
Guide for Conducting Treatability Studies
under CERCLA: Biodegradation Remedy Se-
lection. Quick Reference Fact Sheet.
See 1160
Guide for Conducting Treatability Studies
under CERCLA: Chemical Dehalogenation.
See 1161
Guide for Conducting Treatability Studies
under CERCLA: Soil Vapor Extraction. Quick
Reference Fact Sheet.
See 1164
Guide for Conducting Treatability Studies
under CERCLA: Soil Washing: Quick Refer-
ence Fact Sheet.
See 1166
Guide for Conducting Treatability Studies
under CERCLA Solvent Extraction. Interim
Guidance,
See 1167
Guide for Conducting Treatability Studies
under CERCLA: Solvent Extraction Quick
Reference Fact Sheet.
See 1168
Guide for Conducting Treatability Studies
under CERCLA: Thermal Desorption Quick
Reference Fact Sheet.
See 1169
Guide on Remedial Actions at Superfund
Sites with PCB Contamination.
See 1262
Guide on Remedial Actions for Contaminat-
ed Ground Water.
See 1461
Guide to Addressing Pre-ROD and Post-
ROD Changes.
See 1096
Guide to Delisting of RCRA Wastes for Su-
perfund Remedial Responses.
See 0422
Guide to Developing Action Memorandums.
See 1097
Guide to Developing Superfund No Action,
Interim Action, and Contingency Remedy
RODS.
See 1098
Guide to Developing Superfund Proposed
Plans.
See 1099
Guide to Management of Investigation-De-
rived Wastes.
See 0345
Guide jo Pump and Treat Groundwater Re-
mediation Technology.
See 1462
Guide to Removal Enforcement.
See 1006
Guide to Selecting Superfund Remedial Ac-
tions.
See 1100
Guidelines for Effective Management of the
Contract Laboratory Program.
See 0027
Hazard Ranking System Guidance Manual.
See 0346
Hazardous Waste Operations and Emergen-
cy Response: Uncontrolled Hazardous
Waste Sites and RCRA Corrective Actions.
See 0425
Hazardous Waste Operations and Emergen-
cy Response: RCRA TSD and Emergency
Response Without Regard to Location.
See 0914
Headquarters Support Contract Management
Procedures.
See 0029
Identification of a Senior Superfund Official
for Addressing Special NPL Site-Related
Issues.
See 0348
Implementation of the Decentralized Con-
tractor Performance Evaluation and Award
Fee Process for Selected Remedial Program
Contracts.
See 0031
Implementing the Deputy Administrator's
Risk Characterization Memorandum.
See 1056
Initiation of PRP-Financed Remedial Design
in Advance of Consent Decree Entry (Final).
See 0557
Initiatives to Streamline the Alternative Re-
medial Contracting Strategy (ARCS) Con-
tracts' Award Fee Process.
See 0033
I
:, i.
-------
Innovative Methods to Increase Public In-
volvement in Superiund Community Rela-
tions (Superfund Management Review Rec-
ommendation No. 43.A).
See 0097
Innovative Technology: BEST Solvent Ex-
traction Process.
See 1270
Innovative Technology: Glycolate Dehalo-
genation.
See 1513
Innovative Technology: In-situ Vitrification.
See 1514
Innovative Technology: Slurry-Phase Biode-
gradation.
See 1271
Innovative Technology: Soil Washing
See 1515
Integrated Timeline for Superfund Site Man-
agement (SMR 5,15).
See 0098
Interim Cashout Settlement Procedures.
See 0558
Interim CERCLA Settlement Policy
See 0559
Interim Final Guidance Package on Funding
CERCLA State Enforcement Actions at NPL
Sites.
See 0477
Interim Guidance for Soil Ingestion Rates.
See 1057
Interim Guidance on Establishing Soil Lead
Cleanup Levels at Superfund Sites. Supple-
ment to Interim Guidance on Establishing
Soil Lead Cleanup Levels at Superfund
Sites.
See 1516
Interim Guidance on Potentially Responsible
Party Participation in Remedial Investigations
and Feasibility Studies
See 0561
Interim Guidance on Settlements with De
Minimis Waste Contributors under Section
122(g)ofSARA.
See 0562
Interim Guidance: Streamlining the CERCLA
Settlement Decision Process.
See 0563
Interim Guidelines for Preparing Nonbinding
Preliminary Allocations of Responsibility.
See 0564
Interim RCRA/CERCLA Guidance on Non-
Contiguous Sites and On-Site Management
on Waste and Treatment Residue
See 0427
Involvement of Superfund Program Manag-
ers in Superfund Response Agreement
Audits.
See 0099
Issuance of Administrative Orders for Imme-
diate Removal Actions.
See 0567
Issuance of Administrative Orders Under
Section 3013 of the Resource Conservation
and Recovery Act.
See 0568
Issuance of Final Revised Guidance on the
Use and Issuance of Administrative Orders
Under Section 7003 of the Resource Con-
servation and Recovery Act (RCRA).
See 0569
Land Disposal Restrictions as Relevant and
Appropriate Requirements for CERCLA Con-
taminated Soil and Debris.
See 0428
Liability of Corporate Shareholders and Suc-
cessor Corporations for Abandoned Sites
Under the Comprehensive Environmental
Response, Compensation and Liability Act
See 0570
SUBJECT INDEX
Limiting Lead Transfers to Private Parties
during Discrete Phases of the Remedial
Process.
See 0571
Long-Term Contracting Strategy for Super-
fund.
See 0042
Making Superfund Documents Available to
the Public throughout the Cleanup Process,
and Discussing Site Findings and Decisions
as They are Developed (Superfund Manage-
ment Review: No. 43 G, H, Q, R, T).
See 0100
Management of Investigation-Derived
Wastes during Site Inspections.
See 0349
Mandatory Community Relations Training.
Superfund Management Review Implementa-
tion Product (Recommendation: No. 43.P(i)).
See 0103
Mandatory Training Requirements for OCSs
and RPMs.
See 0104
Methodology for Early be Minimis Waste
Contributor Settlements under CERCLA Sec-
tion 122(g) (1) (A).
See 0573
Minimizing Problems Caused by Staff Turn-
over (Superfund Management Review: Rec-
ommendation No. 43, M, N, O)
See 0105
Model Informational Notice Letter to Local
Governments.
See 0575
Model Litigation Report for CERCLA Sec-
tions 106 and 107 and RCRA Section 7003.
See 0576
Model Performance Standards for Superfund
Project Officers, Deputy Project Officers, and
Work Assignment Managers/Delivery Order
Officers.
See 0045
Model Statement of Work for a Remedial
Investigation and Feasibility Study Conduct-
ed by Potentially Responsible Parties.
See 0578
Model Unilateral Order for Remedial Design
and Remedial Action.
See 0580
Multi-Media Settlements of Enforcement
Claims.
See 0581
Multi-Media Settlements of Enforcement
Claims.
See 0582
Municipal Settlements.
See 0583
Notification of Out-of-State Shipments of Su-
perfund Site Wastes.
See 0429
Notification Requirements for Continuous
Releases of Hazardous Substances.
See 1148
OERR Organizational Conflict of Interest
Review and Approval Program (Superfund
Management Review: Recommendation No
46C).
See 0046
Off-Site Policy: RFA or Equivalent Investiga-
tion Requirement at RCRA Treatment and
Storage Facilities.
See 0431
Oil Notifications: Emergency Response Noti-
fication System (ERNS) Fact Sheet.
See 0930
OSWER Comparative Risk Project. Execu-
tive Summary and Overview.
See 1062
OSWER Integrated Health and Safety Policy.
See 0920
OFFICE OF SOLID WASTE
AND EMERGENCY RESPONSE
OSWER Integrated Health and Safety Stand-
ard Operating Practices.
See 0921
OSWER Source Book: Training and Tech-
nology Transfer Resources.
See 1283
OSWER Source Book. Volume 1. Training
and Technology Transfer Resources, 1992-
1993.
See 1284
OSWER Source Book. Volume 2. Training
and Technology Transfer Resources, 1992-
1993.
See 1285
Overview of ERNS: Emergency Response
Notification System (ERNS) Fact Sheet.
See 0935
Overview of the Off-Site Policy for OSCs and
RPMs.
See 0433
Overview of the Outyear Liability Model
(OLM).
See 0106
Performance of Risk Assessments in Reme-
dial Investigation/Feasibility Studies (Rl/
FSs) Conducted by Potentially Responsible
Parties (PRPs).
See 1102
Performance Tracking under ARCS Con-
tracts.
See 0061
Permits and Permit 'Equivalency' Processes
for CERCLA On-Site Response Actions.
See 0435
Policy for Enforcement Actions against
Transporters under CERCLA.
See 0584
Policy on Floodplains and Wetland Assess-
ments for CERCLA Actions.
See 0437
Policy on Management of Post-Removal Site
Control.
See 1008
Policy on Recovering Indirect Cost in
CERCLA Section 107 Cost Recovery Ac-
tions.
See 0585
Policy Towards Owners of Residential Prop-
erty at Superfund Sites.
See 0586
Political Subdivision Involvement in Super-
fund.
See 0479
Preparation of Hazardous Waste Referrals.
See 0588
Priority for Health and Safety Requirements,
Especially Medical Surveillance Require-
ments, for EPA Employees Who Support
OSWER Programs.
See 0923
Procedures for Documenting Costs for
CERCLA Section 107 Actions.
See 0590
Procedures for Transmittal of CERCLA and
RCRA Civil Judicial Enforcement Case Pack-
ages to Headquarters.
See 0591
Proposed Method to Evaluate the Effective-
ness of Community Involvement in Super-
fund (Superfund Management Review: Rec-
ommendation Number 43.A).
See 0109
PRP Search Supplemental Guidance for
Sites in the Superfund Remedial Program.
See 0592
Public Awareness Signs at Superfund Sites.
See 0481
SU-55
-------
OFFICE Of SOLID WASTE
AND EMERGENCY RESPONSE
ii111' i li'ii'i1:! i '«
: Quality Assurance/Quality Control Guidance
I for Removal AcKyities: Sampling QA/QC
i Pfan and Data Validation Procedures.
&H} ,0993
Questions and Answers About the State
[Role In Remedy Selection at Non-Fund-Fi-
nanced Enforcement Sites.
See 0482
• Real Estate Acquisition Procedures for
USAGE Projects.
| See 1133
: Reassignment of CLP transportation Func-
hfans. ......
See 0063
Rodelegation of Eh/11 Judicial Settlement Au-
..... tbofitles under Delegation 14-13-B and 14-
14-E.
See 0593
||| Regional Guide: issuing Site-Specific Treat-
i .ability Variances for Contaminated Soils and
"ris from Land Disposal Restrictions
........ .........
Sea 1528
, Regional Oversight of Federal Facility Clean-
ups under CERCLA.
See 0900
Regional Pitot Projects and Initiatives.
Soo0064
Regional Pilots and Applications of Super-
fund Accelerated Cleanup Model (SACM).
Sea Olio
Releasing Identities of Potentially Responsi-
ble Parties in Response to FOIA Requests.
See 0594
Releasing Information to Potentially Respon-
sible Parties at CERCLA Sites.
See 0595
Remedial Action Report: Documentation for
Operable Unit Completion.
S*a1134
Remedial Investigation: Site Characterization
and Treatability Studies.
Sea 1106
Reporting and Exchange of Information on
State Enforcement Actions at National Prior-
ities List Sites.
See 0483
Revised EPA Guidance on Parallel Proceed-
: ings.
See 0597
Revised Hazard Ranking System: An Im-
proved Tool for Screening Superfund Sites.
Sea 0377
Revised Hazard Ranking System: Back-
ground Information.
See 0378
Revised Hazard Ranking System: Qs and
As.
See 0381
Revised Hazardous Waste Bankruptcy Guid-
ance.
Sea 0598
Revised Hazardous Waste Bankruptcy Guid-
ance, October 7, 1991.
See 0599
I , Ravlsed Interim Hnar Guidance on Indian In-
voh/flment In the Superfund Program.
See 0484
jf Revised Procedures for Implementing Off-
., Sit* Response Xctions.""
See 0601
R«ivisbn of C|RCLA Civil Judicial Settle-
ment Authorities under Delegations 14-13-B
! and 14-14-E.
See 0602
I Revisions to the Interim Guidance on PRP
i Participation in Remedial Investigations and
' • .Feasibility Studies.
[" ! See 0603
ii" • '• ,R(/FS Improvements.
See 1108
SUBJECT INDEX
RI/FS Streamlining.
See 1110
Risk Assessment Guidance for Superfund.
Volume 1. Human Health Evaluation Manual.
Part A, April 1990.
See 1066
Risk Assessment in Superfund: A Primer.
First Edition, September 1990.
See 1073
Role of Community Interviews in the Devel-
opment of a Community Relations Program
for Remedial Response.
See 0485
Role of Expedited Response Actions under
SARA.
See 1116
Roles and Responsibilities of Deputy Project
Officers and Work Assignment Managers
under the Technical Enforcement Support
(TES) Contracts.
See 0069
Roles and Responsibilities of Regional
Project Officers, Zone Project Officers, Work
Assignment Managers and Contracting Offi-
cers for the RCRA Enforcement, Permitting
and Assistance Contracts (REPA).
See 0070
Roles and Responsibilities of Regional
Project Officers and Headquarters Zone
Project Officers for Management of TES
(TES 5) Contracts.
See 0604
Sampler's Guide to the Contract Laboratory
Program.
See 0071
Scope of the CERCLA Petroleum Exclusion
under Sections 101(14) and 104(a)(2).
See 0605
Site Classification Changes from Enforce-
ment to Fund Lead.
See 0606
Site-Specific Contracting for Removals.
See 1011
Small Cost Recovery Referrals.
See 0869
Smart Moves in Superfund - Regional Initia-
tives. Volume 1, Number 1, February 1992.
See 0305
Smart Moves in Superfund - Revitalization
One Year Later. Volume 1, Number 3, Janu-
ary 1993.
See 0307
Streamlining the RI/FS for CERCLA Munici-
pal Landfill Sites.
See 1118
Streamlining the RI/FS for CERCLA Munici-
pal Landfill Sites.
See 1119
Submittal of Ten-Point Settlement Analyses
for CERCLA Consent Decrees.
See 0871
Suggested ROD Language for Various
Ground Water Remediation Options.
See 1475
Summary of 'Guidance of Landowner Liabil-
ity under Section 107(a)1 of CERCLA, De
Minimis Settlements under Section
122(g)(1)(b) of CERCLA, and Settlements
with Prospective Purchasers of Contaminat-
ed Property'.
See 0872
Summary of 'Guidance on CERCLA Section
106(a) UAOs for RD/RA'.
See 0873
Summary of 'Guidance on Documenting De-
cisions Not to Take Cost Recovery Actions'.
See 0874
Summary of 'Interim Guidance: Streamlining
the CERCLA Settlement Decision Process'.
See 0875
Summary of 'Interim Guidelines for Preparing
NBARs'.
See 0876
Summary of 'Interim Policy on CERCLA Set-
tlements Involving Municipalities and Munici-
pal Wastes'.
See 0877
Summary of 'Methodologies for Implementa-
tion of CERCLA Section 122(g)(1)(a) De
Minimis Waste Contributor Settlements'.
See 0878
Summary of 'Notification of Out-of-State
Shipments of Superfund Site Wastes'.
See 0438
Summary of 'PRP Search Supplemental
Guidance for Sites in the Superfund Remedi-
al Program'.
See 0879
Summary of 'Releasing Information to Poten-
tially Responsible Parties at CERCLA Sites'.
See 0880
Superfund Analytical Review and Oversight.
See 0995
Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Clean-
up Efforts Nationwide (Bog Creek Farm).
See 0940
Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Clean-
up Efforts Nationwide (City Industries).
See 0941
Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Clean-
up Efforts Nationwide (McKin Company).
See 0953
Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Clean-
up Efforts Nationwide, Spring 1993 (Triana/
Tennessee River Site, Alabama).
See 0960
Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Clean-
up Efforts Nationwide (White Chemical).
See 0971
Superfund Cost Recovery Strategy.
See 0882
Superfund Docket Operations Manual for
Rulemaking Activities.
See 0081
Superfund Enforcement Strategy and Imple-
mentation Plan.
See 0833
Superfund Information Repositories and Ad-
ministrative Records.
See 0884
Superfund LDR Guide No. 1: Overview of
RCRA Land Disposal Restrictions (LDRs).
See 0440
Superfund LDR Guide No. 2: Complying with
the California List Restrictions under Land
Disposal Restrictions (LDRs).
See 0441
Superfund LDR Guide No. 3: Treatment
Standards and Minimum Technology Re-
quirements under Land Disposal Restrictions
(LDRS).
See 0442
Superfund LDR Guide No. 4: Complying with
the Hammer Restrictions under Land Dis-
posal Restrictions (LDRs).
See 0443
Superfund LDR Guide No. 5: Determining
When Land Disposal Restrictions (LDRs) Are
'Applicable' to CERCLA Response Actions.
See 0444
Superfund LDR Guide No. 6A (2nd Edition)
Obtaining a Soil and Debris Treatability Vari-
ance for Remedial Actions.
See 0445
Superfund LDR Guide No. 7. Determining
When Land Disposal Restrictions (LDRs) Are
Relevant and Appropriate to CERCLA Re-
sponse Actions.
See 0446
SU-56
-------
SUBJECT INDEX
ON-SITE INVESTIGATIONS
Superfund Progress. Aficionado's Version.
Progress as of September 30, 1992.
See 0327
Superfund: Qualified Disadvantaged Busi-
ness Utilization in State Response
See 0498
Superfund Remedial Program Financial Man-
agement Authority, Responsibilities and Pro-
cedures.
See 1137
Superfund Removal Procedures: Action
Memorandum Guidance
See 1012
Superfund Responsiveness Summaries (Su-
perfund Management Review: Recommen-
dation Number 43E).
See 0125
Superfund Technical Assistance Grant
(TAG) Handbook.
See 0499
Superfund Technical Assistance Grants.
See 0502
Superfund Technical Assistance Grants
(Fact Sheet).
See 0503
Supplemental Guidance on Performing Risk
Assessments in Remedial Investigation/Fea-
sibility Studies (RI/FSs). Conducted by Po-
tentially Responsible Parties (PRPs).
See 1078
Supplemental Guidance to RAGS: Calculat-
ing the Concentration Term. Volume 1,
Number 1, May 1992.
See 1079
Supporting State Attorneys General
CERCLA Remedial and Enforcement Activi-
ties at NPL Sites.
See 0506
Technology Transfer Needs Assessment
1990.
See 1354
Timely Initiation of Responsible Party
Searches, Issuance of Notice Letters, and
Release of Information (Attachment XXII).
See 0886
Total Quality Management (TQM) and Qual-
ity Assurance (QA) in Superfund.
See 0996
Transmittal of Guidance on Use and En-
forcement of CERCLA Information Requests
and Administrative Subpoenas.
See 0887
Transmittal of Model Consent Decree for
CERCLA Section 104(e) Information Re-
quest Enforcement Actions.
See 0888
Transmittal of the Final Waste Oil Interim
Enforcement Guidance Document
See 0889
Treatability Studies Contractor Work Assign-
ments.
See 0076
Treatability Studies Under CERCLA: An
Overview.
See 1172
U.S. Bureau of Reclamation Assistance to
the Superfund Program.
See 1138
Understanding Superfund Risk Assessment
See 0508
United States Environmental Protection
Agency Model CERCLA RD/RA Consent
Decree.
See 0890
USAGE Preplaced and Rapid Response
Contracts.
See 1139
Use of CERCLA Section 106 Unilateral En-
forcement for Remedial Design and Remedi-
al Action: Strategy for Fiscal Year 1990
See 0891
Use of Office of Research and Develop-
ment's Bioremediation Expertise in Super-
fund Removal Program.
See 1016
Use of Removal Approaches to Speed Up
Remedial Action Projects.
See 1140
Use of Time and Materials and Cost Reim-
bursement Subcontracts for Remedial Ac-
tions under the Alternative Remedial Con-
tracting Strategy Contracts.
See 1141
USEPA Contract Laboratory Program Nation-
al Functional Guidelines for Inorganic Data
Review.
See 0997
User's Guide to the Contract Laboratory Pro-
gram.
See 0079
Waiver of Concurrence on De Minimis Gen-
erator Settlements.
See 0892
Written Demand for CERCLA Cost Recov-
ery.
See 0894
Written Demand for Recovery of Costs In-
curred Under the Comprehensive Environ-
mental Response, Compensation, and Liabil-
ity Act (CERCLA).
See 0895
OFFICE OF SOLID WASTES AND
EMERGENCY RESPONSE
CERCLA Implementation of the Training Re-
quirements of EPA Order 3500.1. Inspector
Training.
See 0518
CERCLA Notifications: Emergency Re-
sponse Notification System (ERNS) Fact
Sheet.
See 0926
OFFICE OF WASTE PROGRAMS
ENFORCEMENT
Endangerment Assessment Handbook.
See 0530
OHIO
National Priorities List Sites: Ohio.
See 0247
National Priorities List Sites: Ohio.
See 0248
National Priorities List Sites: Ohio, 1992
See 0249
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Ohio.
See 0723
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Ohio.
See 0724
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Ohio.
See 0725
OIL POLLUTION
Exxon Valdez Oil Spill. A Report to the
President.
See 0928
National Oil and Hazardous Substances Pol-
lution Contingency Plan (The NCP).
See 0146
Oil Spill Contingency Planning: National
Status. A Report to the President.
See 0931
OPA Q's and A's: Overview of the Oil Pollu-
tion Act of 1990.
See 0933
OPA Update: Implementation of the Oil Pol-
lution Act of 1990. Volume 2, Number 1.
See 0934
Technology Evaluation Report SITE Program
Demonstration Test, HAZCON Solidification,
Douglassville, Pennsylvania. Volume 1.
See 1569
Update on Implementation of the Oil Pollu-
tion Act of 1990. Volume 1, Number 1, Feb-
ruary 1991.
See 0936
Update on Implementation of the Oil Pollu-
tion Act of 1990. Volume 1, Number 2, April
1991.
See 0937
Update on Implementation of the Oil Pollu-
tion Act of 1990. Volume 1, Number 3. June
1991.
See 0938
OIL POLLUTION ACT
Facility Response Plans.
See 0929
OIL SPILLS
Emergency Response Notification System.
See 0927
Exxon Valdez Oil Spill. A Report to the
President.
See 0928
Facility Response Plans.
See 0929
National Oil and Hazardous Substances Pol-
lution Contingency Plan (as Published in the
Federal Register, March 8, 1990).
See 0145
Oi| Notifications: Emergency Response Noti-
fication System (ERNS) Fact Sheet.
See 0930
Oil Spill Prevention, Control, and Counter-
measures Program. Task Force Report.
See 0932
Overview of ERNS: Emergency Response
Notification System (ERNS) Fact Sheet.
See 0935
Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Clean-
up Efforts Nationwide, Fall 1992. (Wide
Beach Section of Brant, New York).
See 0948
Understanding Oil Spills and Oil Spill Re-
sponse.
See 0978
Use of Office of Research and Develop-
ment's Bioremediation Expertise in Super-
fund Removal Program.
See 1016
OIL WASTES
Technology Evaluation Report SITE Program
Demonstration Test, HAZCON Solidification,
Douglassville, Pennsylvania. Volume 1.
See 1569
OKLAHOMA
National Priorities List Sites: Oklahoma.
See 0250
National Priorities List Sites: Oklahoma.
See 0251
National Priorities List Sites: Oklahoma,
1992.
See 0252
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Oklahoma.
See 0726
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Oklahoma.
See 0727
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Oklahoma.
See 0728
ON-SCENE COORDINATES
Characterizing soils for hazardous waste site
assessments.
See 1495
ON-SITE INVESTIGATIONS
Revised Hazard Ranking System: An Im-
proved Tool for Screening Superfund Sites.
See 0377
SU-57
-------
OPEN PATH MONITORS
SUBJECT INDEX
Ravteed Hazard Ranking System: Back-
ground Information.
Sae 0378
OPEN PATH MONITORS
Afr/Supwfund National Technical Guidance
; Sjudy Series: Applicability of Open Path
• Monitors for Superfund.
S«a 1375
OREGON
National Priorities List Sites: Oregon.
SOB 0253
;' National Priorities Ust Sites: Oregon.
it-Son 0254
i National Priorities Ust Sites: Oregon, 1992.
Saa 0255
' Sita Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Oregon.
Sea 0729
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Oregon.
Sea 0730
SKa Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Oregon.
Sea 0731
ORGANIC COMPOUNDS
Applications Analysis Report: SITE Program,
OF Systems Organics Extraction System,
New Badford, Massachusetts.
Sea 1196
•i Ground-Water Issue: Soil sampling and anai-
: ysls for volatile organic compounds.
Soa 1507
I Guide for Conducting Treatabllity Studies
undor CGRCLA: Thermal Desorption
Remedy Selection. Interim Guidance.
Saa 1170
MoWto/Transportable Incineration Treat-
ment
Sea 1481
Organic Contract Compliance Screening
System (OCCSS) Software (OLM01.8 Ver-
sion 2) (for Microcomputers).
Sea 0049
Organic Contract Compliance Screening
System (OOCSS) Software (OLM01.8 Ver-
stort 3) (for Microcomputers).
Sea 0050
Organic Contract Compliance Screening
System (OCCSS) Software (OLM01.8 Ver-
sion 5) (for Microcomputers).
Sea 0052
Organic Contract Compliance Screening
System (OCCSS) Software (OLM01.8 Ver-
sion 6) (for Microcomputers).
See 0053
Organic Contract Compliance Screening
System (OCCSS) Software (SOW February
1888) (for Microcomputers).
Sea 0054
Organic Contract Compliance Screening
System (OCCSS) Software (SOW March
1990) (Version 1) (for Microcomputers).
See 0055
Organic Contract Compliance Screening
System (OCCSS) Software (SOW OLM01.8
Vsrston January 1992) (Version 1) (for
Microcomputers).
See 0056
Organic Contract Compliance Screening
System. Software for the PC (OLM01.8 Ver-
ston 1). User Manual.
See 0057
Organic Contract Compliance Screening
System. Software for the PC (OLM01.8 Ver-
sion 2) (User Manual).
Sea 0058
Organic Contract Compliance Screening
System, Software for the PC (SOW March
;;; 1990, Version 1). User Manual.
Sae 0059
Organic Contract Compliance Screening
System. Software for the PC (Version June
1990). User Manual.
See 0060
Comparison of Organic Emissions from Haz-
ardous Waste Incinerators versus the 1990
Toxic Release Inventory Air Releases.
See 1397
Comparison: Organic Emissions from Haz-
ardous Waste Incinerators versus the 1990
Toxics Release Inventory Air Releases.
See 1217
Solvent Extraction Processes: A Survey of
Systems in the SITE Program.
See 1305
Respirometric Methods for Determination of
Biodegradability and Biodegradation Kinetics
for Hazardous Organic Pollutant Com-
pounds.
See 1427
SITE-Emerging Technologies: Laser Induced
Photochemical Oxidative Destruction of
Toxic Organics in Leachates and Ground-
waters.
See 1591
Solvent Extraction Treatment.
See 1306
ORGANIC CONTRACT COMPLIANCE
SCREENING SYSTEM
Organic Contract Compliance Screening
System (OCCSS) Software (OLM01.8 Ver-
sion 2) (for Microcomputers).
See 0049
Organic Contract Compliance Screening
System (OCCSS) Software (OLM01.8 Ver-
sion 3) (for Microcomputers).
See 0050
Organic Contract Compliance Screening
System (OCCSS) Software (OLM01.8 Ver-
sion 6) (for Microcomputers).
See 0053
Organic Contract Compliance Screening
System (OCCSS) Software (SOW February
1988) (for Microcomputers).
See 0054
Organic Contract Compliance Screening
System (OCCSS) Software (SOW March
1990) (Version 1) (for Microcomputers).
See 0055
Organic Contract Compliance Screening
System (OCCSS) Software (SOW OLM01.8
Version January 1992) (Version 1) (for
Microcomputers).
See 0056
Organic Contract Compliance Screening
System. Software for the PC (OLM01.8 Ver-
sion 1). User Manual.
See 0057
Organic Contract Compliance Screening
System. Software for the PC (OLM01.8 Ver-
sion 2) (User Manual).
See 0058
Organic Contract Compliance Screening
System. Software for the PC (SOW March
1990, Version 1). User Manual.
See 0059
Organic Contract Compliance Screening
System. Software for the PC (Version June
1990). User Manual.
See 0060
OUTYEAR LIABILITY MODEL
Overview of the Outyear Liability Model
(OLM).
See 0106
Overview of the Outyear Liability Model
(OLM).
See 0107
OXIDATION
Chemical Oxidation Treatment. Engineering
Bulletin.
See 1211
Advanced Oxidation Technologies for the
Treatment of Contaminated Groundwater.
See 1429
Field Demonstration of the UV/Oxidation
Technology to Treat Ground Water Contami-
nated with VOCs.
See 1452
SITE-Emerging Technologies: Laser Induced
Photochemical Oxidative Destruction of
Toxic Organics in Leachates and Ground-
waters.
See 1591
Technology Evaluation Report: Perox-Pure
(Trade Name) Chemical Oxidation Technolo-
gy.
See 1345
Technology Evaluation Report: SITE Pro-
gram Demonstration of the Ultrox Interna-
tional Ultraviolet Radiation/Oxidation Tech-
nology.
See 1351
OXYGEN COMBUSTION SYSTEM
Control of Transient Incinerator Emissions
with an Oxygen Based Combustion System.
See 1401
PARTICULATES
Air/Superfund National Technical Guidance
Study Series: Estimation of Air Impacts from
Area Sources of Paniculate Matter Emis-
sions at Superfund Sites.
See 1385
PAST SYSTEM
PAST: The Potential ARARs Selection Tool.
See 0434
PATH OF POLLUTANTS
Air/Superfund National Technical Guidance
Series. Superfund Air Pathway Analyses
Review Criteria Checklists.
See 1372
Air/Superfund National Technical Guidance
Study Series: Applicability of Open Path
Monitors for Superfund.
See 1375
Ground-Water Modeling Compendium.
Model Fact Sheets, Descriptions, Applica-
tions and Assessment Framework.
See 1458
New Methods for Modeling the Transport of
Metals from Mineral Processing Wastes into
Surface Waters.
See 1590
Superfund Fact Sheet: Exposure Pathways.
See 0393
PGP (PENTACHLOROPHENOL)
Technology Evaluation Report: SITE Pro-
gram Demonstration. EPA RREL's Mobile
Volume Reduction Unit.
See 1348
PENALTIES
BEN: A Model to Calculate the Economic
Benefit of Noncompliance. User's Manual.
See 0513
Redelegation of Civil Judicial Settlement Au-
thorities under Delegation 14-13-B and 14-
14-E.
See 0593
Revision of CERCLA Civil Judicial Settle-
ment Authorities under Delegations 14-13-B
and 14-14-E.
See 0602
Waiver of Concurrence on De Minimis Gen-
erator Settlements.
See 0892
PENNSYLVANIA
National Priorities List Sites: Pennsylvania.
See 0256
SU-58
-------
SUBJECT INDEX
POLLUTION ABATEMENT
National Priorities List Sites: Pennsylvania.
See 0257
National Priorities List Sites: Pennsylvania,
1992.
See 0258
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Pennsylvania.
See 0732
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Pennsylvania.
See 0733
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Pennsylvania.
See 0734
Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Clean-
up Efforts Nationwide, Fall 1992. (Lans-
downe Radioactive Residence Site Profile).
See 0946
PENTACHLOROPHENOL
Superfund Innovative Technology Evaluation
Program Demonstration Plan for Westing-
house Bio-Analytic Systems Pentachloro-
phenol Immunoassays.
See 1310
Superfund Innovative Technology Evaluation
(Site) Report for the Westinghouse Bio-Ana-
lytic Systems Pentachlorophenol (PGP) Im-
munoassays.
See 1321
PERFORMANCE EVALUATION
EPA SITE Demonstration of the Horsehead
Resource Development Company Flame Re-
actor Technology.
See 1242
PERFORMANCE STANDARDS
Model Performance Standards for Superfund
Project Officers, Deputy Project Officers, and
Work Assignment Managers/Delivery Order
Officers.
See 0045
PERIODICALS
RCRA, Superfund Monthly Hot Line Reports.
See 0303
PEROX-PURE CHEMICAL OXIDATION
TECHNOLOGY
Technology Evaluation Report: Perox-Pure
(Trade Name) Chemical Oxidation Technolo-
gy.
See 1345
PERSONAL COOLING DEVICES
Evaluation of Personal Cooling Devices for
Dioxin Clean-Up Operation.
See 1248
PERSONNEL
Community Relations: Use of Senior Envi-
ronmental Employees in Superfund (Super-
fund Management Review: Recommendation
43.K.L).
See 0088
PERSONNEL DEVELOPMENT
CERCLA Implementation of Inspector Train-
ing Requirements for OSCs/RPMs at the In-
termediate Level in STEP and First-Line Su-
pervisors.
See 0517
CERCLA Implementation of the Training Re-
quirements of EPA Order 3500.1. Inspector
Training.
See 0518
Mandatory Community Relations Training.
Superfund Management Review Implementa-
tion Product (Recommendation: No. 43.P(i)).
See 0103
Mandatory Training Requirements for OCSs
and RPMs.
See 0104
Superfund Progress: Fall/Winter 1992.
See 0328
PESTICIDES
On-Site Methods for Assessing Chemical
Impact on the Soil Environment Using Earth-
worms: A Case Study at the Baird and
McGuire Superfund Site, Holbrook, Massa-
chusetts.
See 1521
Will Soil Working Work for the Sand Creek
Superfund Site.
See 1548
Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Clean-
up Efforts Nationwide, Spring 1993 (Powers-
ville Site Profile, Peach County, Georgia).
See 0958
PETROLEUM PRODUCTS
Treatment of Nonhazardous Petroleum-Con-
taminated Soils by Thermal Desorption
Technologies.
See 1547
PHENOL/PENTACHLORO
Alternative Biological Treatment Processes
for Remediation of Creosote-and PGP-Con-
taminated Materials: Bench-Scale Treatabil-
ity Studies.
See 1418
Bench-Scale Evaluation of Alternative Bio-
logical Treatment Processes for the Remedi-
ation of Pentachlorophenol- and Creosote-
Contaminated Materials: Slurry-Phase Biore-
mediation.
See 1419
Bench-Scale Evaluation of Alternative Bio-
logical Treatment Processes for the Remedi-
ation of Pentachlorophenol- and Creosote-
Contaminated Materials: Solid-Phase Biore-
mediation.
See 1420
Biodegradation of Creosote and Pentachlor-
ophenol in Contaminated Groundwaten
Chemical and Biological Assessment.
See 1432
Detoxification of Pentachlorophenol and Cre-
osote Contaminated Groundwater by Physi-
cal Extraction: Chemical and Biological As-
sessment.
See 1438
PHENOLS
Health Effects Assessment for Phenol.
See 1045
PHOTOCHEMICAL REACTIONS
SITE-Emerging Technologies: Laser Induced
Photochemical Oxidatiye Destruction of
Toxic Organics in Leachates and Ground-
waters.
See 1591
PILOT PLANTS
Pilot-Scale Incineration of Contaminated
Sludges from the Bofors-Nobel Superfund
Site.
See 1289
PILOT PROGRAMS
Regional Pilots and Applications of Super-
fund Accelerated Cleanup Model (SACM).
See 0110
PLANNING
Implementation Plan for the Record of Deci-
sion for Disposal of Hanford Defense High-
Level, Transuranic, and Tank Wastes.
See 1266
PLANTS (BOTANY)
Application of a Plant Test System in the
Identification of Potential Genetic Hazards at
Chemical Waste Sites.
See 1194
PLASMA CENTRIFUGAL FURNACES
Technology Evaluation Report of Retech's
Plasma Centrifugal Furnace. Volume 1.
See 1342
Technology Evaluation Report of Retech's
Plasma Centrifugal Furnace. Volume 2.
See 1343
PLASMA FURNACES
Retech, Inc., Plasma Centrifugal Furnace:
Applications Analysis Report.
See 1295
Technology Evaluation Report of Retech,
Inc., Plasma Centrifugal Furnace. Volume 1.
See 1340
Technology Evaluation Report of Retech,
Inc., Plasma Centrifugal Furnace. Volume 2.
See 1341
PLASMA HEATING
Factors Affecting the Applicability of Plasma
Systems to the Cleanup of Superfund Sites.
See 1250
PNEUMATIC FRACTURING EXTRACTION
Accutech Pneumatic Fracturing Extraction
and Hot Gas Injection, Phase 1. Applications
Analysis Report.
See 1190
Technology Evaluation Report: Site Program
Demonstration Test. Accutech Pneumatic
Fracturing Extraction and Hot Gas Injection,
Phase 1. Volume 1.
See 1352
PO*WW*ER SYSTEM
Chemical Waste Management, Inc.
PO*WW*ER (Trade Name) Evaporation-
Catalytic Oxidation Technology. Technology
Evaluation Report. Volume 1.
See 1213
Chemical Waste Management, Inc.
PO*WW*ER (Trade Name) Evaporation-
Catalytic Oxidation Technology. Technology
Evalution Report. Volume 2.
See 1214
CWM PO*WW*ER (Trade Name) Evapora-
tion-Catalytic Oxidation Technology: Applica-
tions Analysis Report.
See 1225
POINT OF ENTRY TREATMENT
Small Systems Meet Superfund Challenge
with Point-of-Entry Treatment Units.
See 1304
POLLUTANT RELEASES
Questions and Answers on Release Notifica-
tion Requirements and Reportable Quantity
Adjustments.
See 1149
POLLUTION
Characterization of Contaminated Soil from
the Montclair/Glen Ridge, New Jersey, Su-
perfund Sites.
See 1493
Dealing with Toxic Polluted Sediments in the
Great Lakes Basin.
See 1582
International Conference on New Frontiers
for Hazardous Waste Management (Third)
Proceedings. Held in Pittsburgh, Pennsylva-
nia on September 10-13,1989.
See 1278
Superfund Fact Sheet: Arsenic.
See 0488
POLLUTION ABATEMENT
BEN: A Model to Calculate the Economic
Benefit of Noncompliance. User's Manual.
See 0513
BEN: A Model to Calculate the Economic
Benefits of Noncompliance. User's Manual
(Revised).
See 1205
SU-59
-------
POLLUTION CONTROL
SUBJECT INDEX
;;; BEN Model: Calculates Violators' Economic
Benefits from Noncompliance (Version 4.0}
(for Microcomputers).
Sao 0514
National OX and Hazardous Substances Pol-
lution Contingency Plan (The NCP).
See 0146
RCRA, Soparfund Monthly Hot Una Reports.
,j'3^0303'
POLLUTION CONTROL
Accessing Federal Data Bases for Contami-
nated Site Clean-Up Technologies (Third
"Edition).
See 1185
i Accessing Federal Data Bases for Contami-
Jftated Site Clean-Up Technologies.
See 1188
i; Administrative Guidance for the FIT to ARCS
• (FIT/ARCS) Transition.
See 0017
Audits and the Superfund Program Manager.
Sea 0087
Characterization Protocol for Radioactive
Contaminated Sons.
Sea 1494
Considerations in Ground-Water Remedi-
ation at Superfund Sites and RCRA Facili-
ties: Update.
Sea 1437
Contracting and Subcontracting Guide to the
Suportund Program.
Sea 0023
Dobarmont and Suspension.
Soo0470
Development of Electro-Acoustic Soil De-
contamination (ESD) Process for In situ Ap-
plications.
Sea 1498
ECO Update: Ecological Assessment of Su-
perfund Sites. An Overview. Volume 1,
Number 2, December 1991.
Sea 1019
ECO Update: The Role of BTAGs in Ecologi-
cal Assessment Volume 1, Number 1, Sep-
tember 1991.
See 1020
': Estimating Potential for Occurrence of
DNAPL at Superfund Sites.
Sea 1442
Forum on Innovative Hazardous Waste
Treatment Technologies: Domestic and
International. Held in Atlanta, Georgia on
June 19-21,1989. Technical Papers.
See 1253
Guidance on Remedial Actions for Super-
fund Sites with PCB Contamination.
Sea 1260
Guidance on Remedial Actions for Super-
fund Sites with PCB Contamination.
Se«1261
Guide to Community involvement for Site
!!" Assessment Managers.
Sea 0476
Homeowners Exempted from Superfund
; Cleanup Costs: National Policy Overview.
'" Sea 0426
Implementation of the Alternative Remedial
Contracting Strategy (ARCS) Task Force
Recommendations: Transmittal of the Imple-
mentation Plan.
Sea 0030
Implementation of the Superfund Alternative
Remedial Contracting Strategy (ARCS):
, R«port of the Administrator's Task Force.
Implementation Plan.
See 0032
Management Review of the Superfund Pro-
gram.
See 0101
Management Review of the Superfund Pro-
gram: Implementation Plan.
See 0102
Methods for Evaluating the Attainment of
Cleanup Standards. Volume 2. Ground
Water.
See 1469
National Priorities List Book Set.
See 0147
National Priorities List Sites: Alabama.
See 0148
National Priorities List Sites: Alabama.
See 0149
National Priorities List Sites: Alabama, 1992.
See 0150
National Priorities List Sites: Alaska.
See 0151
National Priorities List Sites: Alaska.
See 0152
National Priorities List Sites: Alaska, 1992.
See 0153
National Priorities List Sites: American
Samoa, Guam, and the Trust Territories.
See 0154
National Priorities List Sites: American
Samoa, Guam and Trust Territories.
See 0155
National Priorities List Sites: Arizona and
Nevada.
See 0156
National Priorities List Sites: Arizona and
Nevada.
See 0157
National Priorities List Sites: Arizona and
Nevada, 1992.
See 0158
National Priorities List Sites: Arkansas.
See 0159
National Priorities List Sites: Arkansas.
See 0160
National Priorities List Sites: Arkansas, 1992.
See 0161
National Priorities List Sites: California.
See 0162
National Priorities List Sites: California and
Hawaii.
See 0163
National Priorities List Sites: California and
Hawaii, 1992.
See 0164
National Priorities List Sites: Colorado.
See 0165
National Priorities List Sites: Colorado.
See 0166
National Priorities List Sites: Colorado, 1992.
See 0167
National Priorities List Sites: Connecticut.
See 0168
National Priorities List Sites: Connecticut.
See 0169
National Priorities List Sites: Connecticut,
1992.
See 0170
National Priorities List Sites: Delaware.
See 0171
National Priorities List Sites: Delaware.
See 0172
National Priorities List Sites: Delaware, 1992.
See 0173
National Priorities List Sites: Florida.
See 0174
National Priorities List Sites: Florida.
See 0175
National Priorities List Sites: Florida, 1992.
See 0176
National Priorities List Sites: Georgia.
See 0177
National Priorities List Sites: Georgia.
See 0178
National Priorities List Sites: Georgia, 1992.
See 0179
National Priorities List Sites: Hawaii.
See 0180
National Priorities List Sites: Idaho.
See 0181
National Priorities List Sites: Idaho.
See 0182
National Priorities List Sites: Idaho, 1992.
See 0183
National Priorities List Sites: Illinois.
See 0184
National Priorities List Sites: Illinois.
See 0185
National Priorities List Sites: Illinois, 1992.
See 0186
National Priorities List Sites: Indiana.
See 0187
National Priorities List Sites: Indiana.
See 0188
National Priorities List Sites: Indiana, 1992.
See 0189
National Priorities List Sites: Iowa.
See 0190
National Priorities List Sites: Iowa.
See 0191
National Priorities List Sites: Iowa, 1992.
See 0192
National Priorities List Sites: Kansas.
See 0193
National Priorities List Sites: Kansas.
See 0194
National Priorities List Sites: Kansas, 1992.
See 0195
National Priorities List Sites: Kentucky.
See 0196
National Priorities List Sites: Kentucky.
See 0197
National Priorities List Sites: Kentucky, 1992.
See 0198
National Priorities List Sites: Louisiana.
See 0199
National Priorities List Sites: Louisiana.
See 0200
National Priorities List Sites: Louisiana, 1992.
See 0201
National Priorities List Sites: Maine.
See 0202
National Priorities List Sites: Maine.
See 0203
National Priorities List Sites: Maine, 1992.
See 0204
National Priorities List Sites: Maryland.
See 0205
National Priorities List Sites: Map/land.
See 0206
National Priorities List Sites: Maryland, 1992.
See 0207
National Priorities List Sites: Massachusetts.
See 0208
National Priorities List Sites: Massachusetts.
See 0209
National Priorities List Sites: Massachusetts,
1992.
See 0210
National Priorities List Sites: Michigan.
See 0211
National Priorities List Sites: Michigan.
See 0212
National Priorities List Sites: Michigan, 1992.
See 0213
National Priorities List Sites: Minnesota.
See 0214
National Priorities List Sites: Minnesota.
See 0215
National Priorities List Sites: Minnesota,
1992.
See 0216
National Priorities List Sites: Mississippi.
See 0217
SU-60
iilliiliilililli tililiiiililii iiiilM^^^ lilliiiil iiiiiiliti. iitllll Illii i/iiLi,,:! ii,ili,ilii,i, Hi aiiiJIilli!: .I,1 lii iiiiiilil I!-' iliiii I in:,-,1; ill,!.;iii, ill.; i,i;
-------
SUBJECT INDEX
POLLUTION CONTROL
National Priorities List Sites: Mississippi.
See 0218
National Priorities List Sites: Mississippi
1992.
See 0219
National Priorities List Sites: Missouri.
See 0220
National Priorities List Sites: Missouri
See 0221
National Priorities List Sites: Missouri, 1992
See 0222
National Priorities List Sites: Montana
See 0223
National Priorities List Sites: Montana
See 0224
National Priorities List Sites: Montana, 1992
See 0225
National Priorities List Sites: Nebraska
See 0226
National Priorities List Sites: Nebraska.
See 0227
National Priorities List Sites: Nebraska
1992.
See 0228
National Priorities List Sites: New Hamp-
shire.
See 0229
National Priorities List Sites: New Hamp-
shire.
See 0230
National Priorities List Sites: New Hamp-
shire, 1992.
See 0231
National Priorities List Sites: New Jersey.
See 0232
National Priorities List Sites: New Jersey.
See 0233
National Priorities List Sites: New Jersey
1992.
See 0234
National Priorities List Sites: New Mexico.
See 0235
National Priorities List Sites: New Mexico.
See 0236
National Priorities List Sites: New Mexico,
1992.
See 0237
National Priorities List Sites: New York.
See 0238
National Priorities List Sites: New York.
See 0239
National Priorities List Sites: New York
1992.
See 0240
National Priorities List Sites: North and
South Dakota.
See 0241
National Priorities List Sites: North and
South Dakota, 1992.
See 0242
National Priorities List Sites: North Carolina
See 0243
National Priorities List Sites: North Carolina.
See 0244
National Priorities List Sites: North Carolina,
1992.
See 0245
National Priorities List Sites: North Dakota
and South Dakota.
See 0246
National Priorities List Sites: Ohio.
See 0247
National Priorities List Sites: Ohio.
See 0248
National Priorities List Sites: Ohio, 1992
See 0249
National Priorities List Sites: Oklahoma.
See 0250
National Priorities List Sites: Oklahoma.
See 0251
National Priorities List Sites: Oklahoma,
1992.
See 0252
National Priorities List Sites: Oregon.
See 0253
National Priorities List Sites: Oregon.
See 0254
National Priorities List Sites: Oregon, 1992
See 0255
National Priorities List Sites: Pennsylvania
See 0256
National Priorities List Sites: Pennsylvania.
See 0257
National Priorities List Sites: Pennsylvania,
1992.
See 0258
National Priorities List Sites: Puerto Rico.
See 0259
National Priorities List Sites: Puerto Rico.
See 0260
National Priorities List Sites: Puerto Rico and
Virgin Islands, 1992.
See 0261
National Priorities List Sites: Rhode Island.
See 0262
National Priorities List Sites: Rhode Island.
See 0263
National Priorities List Sites: Rhode Island,
1992.
See 0264
National Priorities List Sites Set (1991).
See 0265
National Priorities List Sites: South Carolina.
See 0266
National Priorities List Sites: South Carolina.
See 0267
National Priorities List Sites: South Carolina,
1992.
See 0268
National Priorities List Sites: Tennessee.
See 0269
National Priorities List Sites: Tennessee.
See 0270
National Priorities List Sites: Tennessee,
1992.
See 0271
National Priorities List Sites: Texas.
See 0272
National Priorities List Sites: Texas.
See 0273
National Priorities List Sites: Texas, 1992.
See 0274
National Priorities List Sites: The United
States Territories, 1992.
See 0275
National Priorities List Sites: Utah.
See 0276
National Priorities List Sites: Utah.
See 0277
National Priorities List Sites: Utah, 1992.
See 0278
National Priorities List Sites: Vermont.
See 0279
National Priorities List Sites: Vermont.
See 0280
National Priorities List Sites: Vermont, 1992.
See 0281
National Priorities List Sites: Virginia.
See 0282
National Priorities List Sites: Virginia.
See 0283
National Priorities List Sites: Virginia, 1992.
See 0284
National Priorities List Sites: Washington.
See 0285
National Priorities List Sites: Washington.
See 0286
National Priorities List Sites: Washington,
1992.
See 0287
National Priorities List Sites: West Virginia.
See 0288
National Priorities List Sites: West Virginia.
See 0289
National Priorities List Sites: West Virginia,
1992.
See 0290
National Priorities List Sites: Wisconsin.
See 0291
National Priorities List Sites: Wisconsin.
See 0292
National Priorities List Sites: Wisconsin,
1992.
See 0293
National Priorities List Sites: Wyoming.
See 0294
National Priorities List Sites: Wyoming.
See 0295
National Priorities List Sites: Wyoming, 1992.
See 0296
NPL Characterization Project: National Re-
sults.
See 0355
NPL Characterization Project: Region 1 Re-
sults.
See 0356
NPL Characterization Project: Region 3 Re-
sults.
See 0357
NPL Characterization Project: Region 4 Re-
sults.
See 0358
NPL Characterization Project: Region 5 Re-
sults.
See 0359
NPL Characterization Project: Region 6 Re-
sults.
See 0360
NPL Characterization Project: Region 7 Re-
sults.
See 0361
NPL Characterization Project: Region 8 Re-
sults.
See 0362
NPL Characterization Project: Region 9 Re-
sults.
See 0363
NPL Characterization Project: Region 10 Re-
sults.
See 0364
Oil Spill Contingency Planning: National
Status. A Report to the President.
See 0931
Political Subdivision Involvement in Super-
fund.
See 0480
Progress Toward Implementing Superfund.
Fiscal Year 1988.
See 0299
Progress Toward Implementing Superfund.
Fiscal Year 1989.
See 0300
Control Technologies for Remediation of
Contaminated Soil and Waste Deposits at
Superfund Lead Battery Recycling Sites.
See 1221
Revised Hazard Ranking System: Evaluating
Sites After Waste Removals.
See 0379
Revised Hazard Ranking System (HRS):
Final Rule.
See 0380
Risk Assessment Guidance for Superfund.
Volume 1. Human Health Evaluation Manual
(Part B).
See 1067
SU-61
-------
• If'WU |ni »'! .|!'.111, i
POLLUTION CONTROL EQUIPMENT
SUBJECT INDEX
Risk Assessment Guidance for Superfund.
Volume 1. Human Health Evaluation Manual
CPart B, Development of Risk-Based Prelimi-
nary Remediation Goals).
See 1068
liRisk Assessment Guidance for Superfund.
h Volume 1. Human "Health Evaluation Manual
(PartC).
See 1069
Risk Assessment Guidance for Superfund.
Volume 1. Human Health Evaluation Manual
(Part C, Risk Evaluation of Remedial Alterna-
tives).
Sea 1070
Site Assessment Evaluating Risks at Super-
fund Sites.
' See 1076 1," 1,1
Specifications and Guidance for Contami-
nant-Free Sample Containers.
Sea 0994
SRJS System Overview and User's Guide.
f^e? 0112
""Standard Operating Safety Guides.
Sea 0925
Superfund Accelerated" Cleanup Bulletin.
- Volume 1, Number 1. Presumptive Remedies
11 forMurfclpalUndfill Sites.
See 0117
Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Clean-
up Efforts Nationwide, Fall 1993 (Johns-
Manville Site Profile, Illinois).
See 0952
Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Clean-
up Efforts Nationwide, Spring 1993 (Fulton
Terminals Site Profile, Oswego County, NY).
, See 0955
Superfund Contracts Management Issues.
Sea 0072
•:l|Supfflrfund Fact Sheet: The Removal Pro-
' "gram.
Sea 0495
SUPERFUND: Focusing on the Nation at
Large. A Decade of Progress at National
Priorities Ust Sites.
Sea 0321
; Superfund: Focusing on the Nation at Large.
:=:'= "A Decade of Progress at National Priorities
'!'','LNst Sites.
Sea 0322
P Superfund: Focusing on the Nation at Large.
ill 1991 Update.
See 0323
.';„' SuporfutKl Guide: Reportable Quantity Ad-
1 iustrnwrt for Methyl Isocyanate (MIC).
See 1152
Superfund Progress - Aficionado's Version
(Progress as of March 31,1992).
See 0326
Superfund Progress, Spring 1992.
S«0329
Superfund Removal Procedures: Public Par-
" UcipaSon Guidance for On-Soene Coordina-
: tors: Community Relations and the Adminis-
trative Record.
See 1014
" Superfund Removal Procedures: Removal
Enforcement Guidance for On-Scene Coordi-
nators.
See 1015
Superfurid Strategic Plan and Implementa-
tion Strategy Fiscal Year 1994.
See 0126
Superfund Strategic Plan and Implementa-
tion Strategy Fiscal Year 1994: Office and
Division Plans.
Soo 0127
I'., Superfund Technical Assistance Grants Pro-
f1 ,i! gram: Regional Guidance Manual.
See 0504
Technology Evaluation Report. SITE Pro-
gram Demonstration, Resources Conserva-
tion Company, Basic Extractive Sludge
Treatment (B.E.S.T. (Trade Name)), Grand
Calumet River, Gary, Indiana. Volume 1.
See 1593
Technology Evaluation Report. SITE Pro-
gram Demonstration, Resources Conserva-
tion Company, Basic Extractive Sludge
Treatment (B.E.S.T. (Trade Name)), Grand
Calumet River, Gary, Indiana. Volume 2. Part
1.
See 1594
Technology Evaluation Report. SITE Pro-
gram Demonstration, Resources Conserva-
tion Company, Basic Extractive Sludge
Treatment (B.E.S.T. (Trade Name)), Grant
Calumet River, Gary, Indiana. Volume 2. Part
2.
See 1595
Technology Evaluation Report. SITE Pro-
gram Demonstration, Resources Conserva-
tion Company, Basic Extractive Sludge
Treatment (B.E.S.T. (Trade Name)), Grand
Calumet River, Gary, Indiana. Volume 2. Part
3.
See 1596
Technology Selection Guide for Wood Treat-
er Sites.
See 1122
Update No. 2 to 'Procedures for Completion
and Deletion of NPL Sites'.
See 0395
Update on Implementation of the Oil Pollu-
tion Act of 1990. Volume 1, Number 1, Feb-
ruary 1991.
See 0936
Update on Implementation of the Oil Pollu-
tion Act of 1990. Volume 1, Number 2, April
1991.
See 0937
Update on Implementation of the Oil Pollu-
tion Act of 1990. Volume 1, Number 3, June
1991.
See 0938
Vendor Information System for Innovative
Treatment Technologies (VISITT). Number 1.
See 1370
POLLUTION CONTROL EQUIPMENT
EPA SITE Demonstration of the Hbrsehead
Resource Development Company Flame Re-
actor Technology.
See 1242
POLLUTION LAWS
Compendium of CERCLA ARARs fact
sheets and directives.
See 0417
Evaluation of Cleanup Levels for Remedial
Action at CERCLA (Comprehensive Environ-
mental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) Sites Based on a Review of EPA
(Environmental Protection Agency) Records
of Decision.
See 1245
OPA Q's and A's: Overview of the Oil Pollu-
tion Act of 1990.
See 0933
Superfund Fact Sheet: An Overview.
See 0487
POLLUTION MONITORING
Technology Evaluation Report: SITE Pro-
gram. CF Systems Organics Extraction
System, New Bedford, Massachusetts.
Volume 2.
See 1347
POLLUTION REGULATION
CERCLA Compliance with Other Laws
Manual. Part 1. Interim Final.
See 0409
POLLUTION REGULATIONS
Criminal Investigations and the Superfund
Program.
See 0469
Guidance for Federal Facilities on Release
Notification Requirements under CERCLA
and SARA Title III.
See 0898
Guide to Management of Investigation-De-
rived Wastes.
See 0345
Instructional Package on Regulatory Air
Quality Modeling. Part 1: Videos on the
'Guideline on Air Quality Models (Revised)'
and the Model Clearinghouse (Video).
See 1412
Management of Investigation-Derived
Wastes during Site Inspections.
See 0349
Meeting Summary: National Advisory Council
on Environmental Policy and Technology
(1st). Subcommittee on Radiation Cleanup
Regulation. Held in Washington, DC. on Oc-
tober 18-19, 1993.
See 1059
NACEPT Meeting. Held in Crystal City, Vir-
ginia on February 11, 1994.
See 0144
Organic Contract Compliance Screening
System (OCCSS) Software (OLM01.8 Ver-
sion 2) (for Microcomputers).
See 0049
Organic Contract Compliance Screening
System. Software for the PC (OLM01.8 Ver-
sion 2) (User Manual).
See 0058
Overview of Selected EPA (Environmental
Protection Agency) Regulations and Guid-
ance Affecting POTW (Publicly Owned
Treatment Works) Management.
See 0432
Progress Toward Implementing Superfund,
Fiscal Year 1990: A Report to the Congress.
See 0301
PAST: The Potential ARARs Selection Tool.
See 0434
Role of Health Research in Support of
EPA's Regulatory Programs.
See 1074
Superfund Administrative Improvements:
Reinventing Superfund.
See 0312
Superfund Reauthorization: NACEPT Sub-
committee Handbook.
See 0331
POLLUTION SAMPLING
Data Quality Objectives Decision Error Fea-
sibility Trials (DEFT) Beta Version 1.01.
User's Guide.
See 0979
Data Quality Objectives Process for Super-
fund.
See 0982
Data Quality Objectives Process for Super-
fund: interim Final Guidance.
See 0983
Data Quality Objectives Process for Super-
fund: Workbook.
See 0984
POLLUTION STANDARDS
Organic Contract Compliance Screening
System (OCCSS) Software (OLM01.8 Ver-
sion 5) (for Microcomputers).
See 0052
POLYCHLORINATED BIPHENYL
Guidance on Remedial Actions for Super-
fund Sites with PCB Contamination.
See 1261
SU-62
-------
SUBJECT INDEX
POTENTIALLY RESPONSIBLE PARTIES
POLYCHLORINATED BIPHENYLS
EPA Engineering Issue: Technology Alterna-
tives for the Remediation of PCB-Contami-
nated Soil and Sediment.
See 1501
Framework for Real-Time Decision-Making:
New Bedford Harbor Pilot Dredging Study
See 1587
Guide on Remedial Actions at Superfund
Sites with PCB Contamination.
See 1262
In-situ Stabilization/Solidification of PCB
(Polychlorinated Biphenyls)-Contaminated
Soil.
See 1556
International Waste Technologies/Geo-Con
In situ Stabilization/Solidification: Applica-
tions Analysis Report.
See 1557
Application of 'Real-Time' Monitoring in De-
cision Making: The New Bedford Harbor
Pilot Dredging Project.
See 1574
SITE Demonstration of the CF Systems Or-
ganics Extraction System.
See 1301
Superfund Fact Sheet: PCBs.
See 0492
Technology Evaluation Report: SITE Pro-
gram. CF Systems Organics Extraction
System, New Bedford, Massachusetts.
Volume 1.
See 1346
Technology Evaluation Report: SITE Pro-
gram. CF Systems Organics Extraction
System, New Bedford, Massachusetts.
Volume 2.
See 1347
PORTABLE EQUIPMENT
Evaluation of Portable Gas Chromatographs
See 1479
Mobile/Transportable Incineration Treat-
ment.
See 1481
POTABLE WATER
Remediation Completed: But Is the Ground-
water Meeting the Safe Drinking Water Act
Requirements. Haztech International 90.
Held in Houston, Texas on May 8-10, 1990.
See 1473
Small Systems Meet Superfund Challenge
with Point-of-Entry Treatment Units.
See 1304
POTENTIAL RESPONSIBLE PARTY
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 1.
See 0740
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 2.
See 0745
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 3.
See 0749
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 4.
See 0754
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)-
PRP Listing by Site for Region 5.
See 0759
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 6.
See 0764
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 7.
See 0769
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 8.
See 0774
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)-
PRP Listing by Site for Region 9.
See 0779
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 10.
See 0784
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP National Listing Alphabetically by Party
Name.
See 0830
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP National Listing by Site.
See 0836
POTENTIALLY RESPONSIBLE PARITES
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Report by Site for Region 7, September
26, 1991.
See 0844
POTENTIALLY RESPONSIBLE PARTIES
Evaluation of, and Additional Guidance on,
Issuance of Unilateral Administrative Orders
(UAOs) for RD/RA.
See 0538
Extending the Tracking of Analytical Serv-
ices to Potentially Responsible Party-Lead
Superfund Sites (Supplemental Guidance on
OSWER Directive 9240.0-2A).
See 0986
Guidance on Oversight of Potentially Re-
sponsible Party Remedial Investigations and
Feasibility Studies. Volume 1.
See 1094
Guidance on Oversight of Potentially Re-
sponsible Party Remedial Investigations and
Feasibility Studies. Volume 2. Appendices.
See 1095
Guidance on Oversight of PRP Performed
RD/RA.
See 1130
Interim Guidance on Potentially Responsible
Party Participation in Remedial Investigations
and Feasibility Studies.
See 0561
Model Statement of Work for a Remedial
Investigation and Feasibility Study Conduct-
ed by Potentially Responsible Parties.
See 0578
Revised Policy on Discretionary Information
Release under CERCLA.
See 0600
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
Frequency by Party Name Report.
See 0608
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
Frequency by Party Name Report.
See 0609
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
Frequency by PRP Name Report, September
26, 1991.
See 0610
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
National Alphabetical Report by PRP Name,
September 26, 1991.
See 0612
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
National Frequency by PRP Name Report.
See 0614
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
National PRP Listing Alphabetically by PRP
Name.
See 0615
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
National PRP Listing by Site.
See 0617
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
National PRP Listing by Site.
See 0618
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
National PRP Report by Site, September 26,
1991.
See 0619
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)
(National - 3 1/2 Inch Diskette, IBM PS/2
Compatible) (for Microcomputers).
See 0620
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Alabama.
See 0622
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Alabama.
See 0623
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for American Samoa.
See 0625
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for American Samoa.
See 0626
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Arizona.
See 0628
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Arizona.
See 0629
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Arkansas.
See 0631
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Arkansas.
See 0632
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for California.
See 0634
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for California.
See 0635
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Colorado.
See 0637
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Colorado.
See 0638
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Connecticut.
See 0640
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Connecticut.
See 0641
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Delaware.
See 0643
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Delaware.
See 0644
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Florida.
See 0646
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Florida.
See 0647
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Georgia.
See 0649
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Georgia.
See 0650
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Idaho.
See 0652
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Idaho.
See 0653
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Illinois.
See 0655
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Illinois.
See 0656
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Indiana.
See 0658
SU-63
-------
POTENTIALLY RESPONSIBLE PARTIES
SUBJECT INDEX
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Indiana.
"See 0659
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PHP Usting by Site for Iowa.
.................................
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP UstSng by Site for Iowa.
Soa 0662
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Usting by Site for Kansas.
See 0664
"Die '.Enforcement" Tracking System "(SETS):
PRP, Usting by Site for Kansas.
Seo0665
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP UsSng by Site for Kentucky.
See 0667
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Usting by Site for Kentucky.
See 0668
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
' ERP Usting by Site for Louisiana.
Soe 0670
! Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
i EBP Usting by Site for Louisiana.
See 0671
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Usting by Site for Maine.
See 0673
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Usting by Site for Maine.
See 0674
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Usting by Site for Maryland.
See 0676
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Usting by Site for Maryland.
See 0677
iSite, Enforcement ..... Tracking System (SETS):
_ „ usling by site for Massachusetts.
See 0679
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Usting by Site for Massachusetts.
Sec 0680
11 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
ERP Ltetjng by Site for Michigan.
!' See 0682
['Sjte Enforcement Trackjng System (SETS):
11 ..... PR p'Usting "by Site for Michigan.
•See 0683 ............................
i ate Enforcement tracking System (SETS):
PRP Usting by Site for Minnesota.
See 0685
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Usting by Site for Minnesota.
See 0686
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Usting by Site for Mississippi.
Sea 0688
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Ustfng by Site for Mississippi.
See 0689
1 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Usting by Site for Missouri.
See 0691
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Usting by Site for Missouri.
See 0692
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Usting by Site for Montana.
See 0694
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Usting by Site for Montana.
See 0695
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Usting by Site for Nebraska.
Sea 0697
- Site, Enforcement Trackjng System (SETS):
5 PRP "Usting by "Site for Nebraska.
See 0698
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Usting by Site for Nevada.
See 0700
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Usting by Site for Nevada.
See 0701
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for New Hampshire.
See 0703
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for New Hampshire.
See 0704
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for New Jersey.
See 0706
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Usting by Site for New Jersey.
See 0707
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for New Mexico.
See 0709
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for New Mexico.
See 0710
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Usting by Site for New York.
See 0712
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Usting by Site for New York.
See 0713
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for North Carolina.
See 0715
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Usting by Site for North Carolina.
See 0716
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for North Dakota.
See 0718
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for North Dakota.
See 0719
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Northern Marianas.
See 0721
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Northern Marianas.
See 0722
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Usting by Site for Ohio.
See 0724
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Ohio.
See 0725
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Oklahoma.
See 0727
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Oklahoma.
See 0728
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Oregon.
See 0730
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Oregon.
See 0731
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Pennsylvania.
See 0733
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Usting by Site for Pennsylvania.
See 0734
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Usting by Site for Puerto Rico.
See 0736
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Puerto Rico.
See 0737
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 1.
See 0738
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 1, January
22, 1992.
See 0741
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 1. Volume 1.
See 0742
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 2.
See 0743
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 2, January
22,1992.
See 0746
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 2. Volume 2.
See 0747
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 3.
See 0743
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 3, January
22,1992.
See 0750
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 3. Volume 3.
See 0751
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 4.
See 0752
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 4. Volume 4.
See 0756
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 5.
See 0757
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 5, January
22, 1992.
See 0760
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 5. Volume 5.
See 0761
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Usting by Site for Region 6.
See 0762
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 6, January
22, 1992.
See 0765
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 6. Volume 6.
See 0766
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Usting by Site for Region 7.
See 0767
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 7, January
22, 1992.
See 0770
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Usting by Site for Region 7. Volume 7.
See 0771
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 8.
See 0772
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 8, January
22, 1992.
See 0775
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 8. Volume 8.
See 0776
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 9.
See 0777
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 9.
See 0778
SU-64
-------
SUBJECT INDEX
PREREMEDIAL ACTIONS
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 9, January
22,1992.
See 0780
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 9. Volume 9.
See 0781
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 10.
See 0782
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 10, January
22,1992.
See 0785
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 10. Volume
10.
See 0786
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Rhode Island.
See 0788
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Rhode Island.
See 0789
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for South Carolina.
See 0791
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for South Carolina.
See 0792
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for South Dakota.
See 0794
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for South Dakota.
See 0795
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Tennessee.
See 0797
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Tennessee.
See 0798
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Texas.
See 0800
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Texas.
See 0801
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Trust Territories.
See 0803
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Trust Territories.
See 0804
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Utah.
See 0806
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Utah.
See 0807
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Vermont.
See 0809
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Vermont.
See 0810
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Virginia.
See 0811
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Virginia.
See 0812
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Washington.
See 0814
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Washington.
See 0815
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for West Virginia.
See 0817
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for West Virginia.
See 0818
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Wisconsin.
See 0820
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Wisconsin.
See 0821
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Wyoming.
See 0823
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Wyoming.
See 0824
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP National Frequency by Party Name,
January 22,1992.
See 0825
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP National Listing Alphabetically by Party
Name.
See 0827
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP National Listing Alphabetically by Party
Name.
See 0829
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP National Listing Alphabetically by Party
Name, January 22, 1992.
See 0831
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP National Listing by Site.
See 0833
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP National Listing by Site.
See 0834
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP National Listing by Site.
See 0835
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP National Listing by Site, January 22,
1992.
See 0837
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Report by Site for Region 1, September
26, 1991.
See 0838
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Report by Site for Region 2, September
26, 1991.
See 0839
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Report by Site for Region 3, September
26, 1991.
See 0840
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Report by Site for Region 4, September
26, 1991.
See 0841
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Report by Site for Region 5, September
26, 1991.
See 0842
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Report by Site for Region 6, September
26, 1991.
See 0843
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Report by Site for Region 9, September
26, 1991.
See 0846
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Report by Site for Region 10, Septem-
ber 26, 1991.
See 0847
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)
(Region 1-31/2 Inch Diskette IBM PS/2
Compatible) (for Microcomputers).
See 0849
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)
(Region 2-31/2 Inch Diskette IBM PS/2
Compatible) (for Microcomputers).
See 0851
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)
(Region 3-3 1/2 Inch Diskette IBM PS/2
, Compatible) (for Microcomputers).
See 0853
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)
(Region 4-31/2 Inch Diskette IBM PS/2
Compatible) (for Microcomputers).
See 0855
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)
(Region 5-31/2 Inch Diskette IBM PS/2
Compatible) (for Microcomputers).
See 0857
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)
(Region 6-31/2 Inch Diskette IBM PS/2
Compatible) (for Microcomputers).
See 0859
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)
(Region 7-3 1/2 Inch Diskette IBM PS/2
Compatible) (for Microcomputers).
See 0861
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)
(Region 8-31/2 Inch Diskette IBM PS/2
Compatible) (for Microcomputers).
See 0863
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)
(Region 9-31/2 Inch Diskette IBM PS/2
Compatible) (for Microcomputers).
See 0865
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)
(Region 10 - 3 1/2 Inch Diskette IBM PS/2
Compatible) (for Microcomputers).
See 0867
Superfund and Small Waste Contributors.
See 0881
Supplemental Guidance on Performing Risk
Assessments in Remedial Investigation/Fea-
sibility Studies (RI/FSs). Conducted by Po-
tentially Responsible Parties (PRPs).
See 1078
POTENTIALLY RESPONSIBLE PARTIES
(PRPS)
Discussions with the Public Concerning NPL
Listings.
See 0339
PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT
PA-Score (Preliminary Assessment Score)
User's Manual and Tutorial. Version 2.1.
See 0367
PA-Score (Preliminary Assessment Score),
Version 1.0 (for Microcomputers).
See 0368
PA-Score Software, Version 1.0. Users
Manual and Tutorial.
See 0371
PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT PETITION
CERCLIS Listing.
See 0014
PREREMEDIAL ACTION
Accelerated Response at NPL Sites Guid-
ance (Superfund Management Review: Rec-
ommendation No. 22).
See 0082
Decentralization of Superfund Bottle Reposi-
tory Functions.
See 0985
Expediting Remedial Construction.
See 1127
Superfund Analytical Review and Oversight.
See 0995
PREREMEDIAL ACTIONS
Feasibility Study: Detailed Analysis of Reme-
dial Action Alternatives.
See 1088
SU-65
-------
PRESCORE COMPUTER MODEL
SUBJECT INDEX
Gujda for Conducting Treatability Studies
Jiflder CERCLA: Aerobic Btodegradation
Rbmody Screening!
SCO 1156
Guide for Conducting Treatability Studies
Wider ' CERpLA: Aerpbjc BIpdegradation
Romody Screening! Interim Guidance.
See 1157
PRESCORE COMPUTER MODEL
Prtllmtnary Ranking Evaluation Score
(PREscore) Version 2.0 (for Microcomput-
ers),
S4W0373
PREscor* Software: Users Manual and Tuto-
rial Version 2.0.
S«wb375
PRESCORE PROGRAM
Preliminary Ranking Evaluation Score
(PREscore) Version 1.1 (for Microcomput-
ers).
S0S0372
PRINCE WILLIAM SOUND
Exxon Vaktez OM Spill. A Report to the
President
5000928
PRKJRITY ASSESSMENT MODEL,
Continuous Release-Emergency Response
Notification System and Priority Assessment
Model; Model Documentation.
Sea 1143
Continuous Release-Emergency Response
Notification System and Priority Assessment
Modal; User's Manual for EPA Regions.
8001144
PROFILE (ILLINOIS)
Suporfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Clean-
up Efforts Nationwide, Fall 1993 (Johns-
Manville Site Profile, Illinois).
See 0352
PROGRAM MANAGEMENT
CERCLIS - WasteLAN - CleanLAN.
Sao 0015
Compendium of Good Ideas: Models of Suc-
cess and Lessons Learned. Volume 1. High-
lights.
§f»a0133
' Compendium of Good Ideas: Models of Suc-
csss and Lessons Learned. Volume 2.
'"'Source Book.
Sea 0134
Suportund Program and Information Man-
Jiigamont Update. Volume 1, Number 1, No-
vember 1993.
Soa 0123
Superfund Strategic Plan and Implementa-
tion Strategy Fiscal Year 1994.
See 0126
Suparfund Strategic Plan and Implementa-
tion Strategy Fiscal Year 1994: Office and
;; Division Plans.
SM 0127
PROGRESS
< Suporfund: Environmental Progress.
Sea 0976
PROJECT MANAGEMENT
Administrative Guidance for the FIT to ARCS
(FIT/ARCS) Transition.
See 0017
Approval of Long Term Contracting Strategy
for Superfund (Superfund Management
Review: Recommendation E.2).
Sea 0018
, ARAR's Q's and A's. Compliance with the
i Tpxfcity Characteristics Rule. Part 1.
See 0396
ARARs Q's and A's.
Soo 0398
ARARS Q's and A's: Compliance with Fed-
eral Water Quality Criteria.
See 0399
Audits and the Superfund Program Manager.
See 0086
Audits and the Superfund Program Manager.
See 0087
CERCLA Compliance with Other Laws
Manual: CERCLA Compliance with State Re-
quirements.
See 0405
CERCLA Compliance with Other Laws
Manual: CERCLA Compliance with the CWA
and SDWA.
See 0406
CERCLA Compliance with Other Laws
Manual: Guide to Manual.
See 0407
CERCLA Compliance with Other Laws
Manual: Overview of ARARs - Focus on
ARAR Waivers.
See 0408
CERCLA Compliance with Other Laws
Manual: RCRA ARARS-Focus on Closure
Requirements.
See 0410
CERCLA Compliance with Other Laws
Manual: Summary and Part 2. CAA, TSCA,
and Other Statutes.
See 0411
CERCLIS Data Handling Support Policy
Statement.
See 0013
Compendium of Federal Financial Assist-
ance Programs: Targeting Programs for
State and Local Ground-Water Protection.
See 1435
Getting Ready: Scoping the RI/FS.
See 1092
Guidance on EPA Oversight of Remedial De-
signs and Remedial Actions Performed by
Potentially Responsible Parties.
See 1128
Guidelines for Effective Management of the
Contract Laboratory Program.
See 0027
Highlights: Superfund Program Management.
Fiscal Year 1993.
See 0095
Implementation of the Superfund Alternative
Remedial Contracting Strategy (ARCS):
Report of the Administrator's Task Force.
Implementation Plan.
See 0032
Interim RCRA/CERCLA Guidance on Non-
Contiguous Sites and On-Site Management
on Waste and Treatment Residue.
See 0427
Long-Term Contracting Strategy for Super-
fund.
See 0042
Mandatory Community Relations Training.
Superfund Management Review Implementa-
tion Product (Recommendation: No. 43.P(i)).
See 0103
Model Performance Standards for Superfund
Project Officers, Deputy Project Officers, and
Work Assignment Managers/Delivery Order
Officers.
See 0045
OSWER Comparative Risk Project. Execu-
tive Summary and Overview.
See 1062
OSWER Integrated Health and Safety Policy.
See 0920
Planning for Sufficient Community Relations
(Superfund Management Review: No. 43A).
See 0108
Revised Hazard Ranking System: Evaluating
Sites After Waste Removals.
See 0379
RI/FS Improvements Follow-Up.
See 1109
Superfund: Environmental Progress.
See 0976
Superfund Policy Forum Update, Volume 1,
Number 1, February 1992.
See 0324
Superfund Program Management Manual,
Fiscal Year 1994.
See 0073
Superfund Program: Ten Years of Progress.
See 0977
Superfund Progress - Aficionado's Version
(Progress as of March 31,1992).
See 0326
Superfund Progress, Spring 1992.
See 0329
USAGE Preplaced and Rapid Response
Contracts.
See 1139
PROJECT PLANNING
Status of State Involvement in the Superfund
Program, FY 80 to FY 89.
See 0114
PROPERTY OWNERS
Policy Towards Owners of Residential Prop-
erty at Superfund Sites.
See 0587
PROTECTION
Superfund Progress - Aficionado's Version:
Progress as of June 30,1992.
See 0325
Superfund Progress, Summer 1992.
See 0330
PROTECTIVE CLOTHING
Limited-Use Chemical Protective Clothing for
EPA Superfund Activities.
See 1058
Estimation of the Cost of Using Chemical
Protective Clothing.
See 1244
PROTECTIVE EQUIPMENT
Evaluation of Personal Cooling Devices for
Dioxin Clean-Up Operation.
See 1248
PUBLIC EDUCATION
Communicating with the Public About Haz-
ardous Materials: An Examination of Local
Practice. Risk Communication Series.
See 0464
PUBLIC HEALTH
Air/Superfund National Technical Guidance
Study Series: Estimation of Air Impacts for
Air Stripping of Contaminated Water.
See 1382
Ecological Risk Assessment Methods: A
Review and Evaluation of Past Practices in
the Superfund and RCRA (Resource Conser-
vation and Recovery Act) Programs (Execu-
tive Summary Included).
See 1024
Guidance for Coordinating ATSDR Health
Assessment Activities with the Superfund
Remedial Process.
See 1029
Guidance for Data Useability in Risk Assess-
ment.
See 1030
Guidance for Data Useability in Risk Assess-
ment. Interim Report.
See 1032
Guidance for Data Useability in Risk Assess-
ment (Part A).
See 1033
SU-66
-------
SUBJECT INDEX
REAL ESTATE
Guidance for Data Useability in Risk Assess-
ment (Part B).
See 1034
Guidance on Remedial Actions for Super-
fund Sites with PCB Contamination.
See 1261
Health and Safety Roles and Responsibilities
at Remedial Sites.
See 0918
Health Effects Assessment Summary
Tables.
See 1051
Health Effects Assessment Summary
Tables.
See 1052
Health Effects Assessment Summary
Tables.
See 1053
Health Effects Assessment Summary Tables
Fourth Quarter FY 1989.
See 1054
Interim Guidance on Establishing Soil Lead
Cleanup Levels at Superfund Sites. Supple-
ment to Interim Guidance on Establishing
Soil Lead Cleanup Levels at Superfund
Sites.
See 1516
Recent Advances in Risk Reduction Engi-
neering.
See 1064
Risk Assessment Guidance for Superfund.
Volume 1. Human Health Evaluation Manual.
Part A, April 1990.
See 1066
Risk Assessment Guidance for Superfund.
Volume 1. Human Health Evaluation Manual
(Part B).
See 1067
Risk Assessment Guidance for Superfund.
Volume 1. Human Health Evaluation Manual
(Part B, Development of Risk-Based Prelimi-
nary Remediation Goals).
See 1068
Risk Assessment Guidance for Superfund.
Volume 1. Human Health Evaluation Manual
(Part C).
See 1069
Risk Assessment Guidance for Superfund.
Volume 1. Human Health Evaluation Manual
(Part C, Risk Evaluation of Remedial Alterna-
tives).
See, 1070
Risk Assessment Guidance for Superfund.
Volume 1. Human Health Evaluation Manual.
Supplemental Guidance: 'Standard Default
Exposure Factors'.
See 1071
Role of Health Research in Support of
EPA's Regulatory Programs.
See 1074
Standard Operating Safety Guides.
See 0925
Summary of Ecological Risks, Assessment
Methods, and Risk Management Decisions
in Superfund and RCRA (Resource Conser-
vation and Recovery Act).
See 1077
Superfund Fact Sheet: Exposure Pathways.
See 0393
Toxicological Profile for
Benzo(b)Fluoranthene.
See 1360
PUBLIC INFORMATION
Superfund Emergency Response Actions: A
Summary of Federally-Funded Removals.
Sixth Annual Report, Fiscal Year 1991.
See 0315
PUBLICLY OWNED TREATMENT WORKS
CERCLA Site Discharges to POTWS
CERCLA Site Sampling Program: Detailed
Data Report.
See 1575
CERCLA Site Discharges to POTWS Treat-
ability Manual.
See 1577
Discharge of Wastewater from CERCLA
Sites into POTWS.
See 0421
Overview of Selected EPA (Environmental
Protection Agency) Regulations and Guid-
ance Affecting POTW (Publicly Owned
Treatment Works) Management.
See 0432
PUERTO RICO
National Priorities List Sites: Massachusetts.
See 0209
National Priorities List Sites: Puerto Rico.
See 0259
National Priorities List Sites: Puerto Rico.
See 0260
National Priorities List Sites: Puerto Rico and
Virgin Islands, 1992.
See 0261
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Puerto Rico.
See 0735
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Puerto Rico.
See 0737
PYRETRON BURNERS
SITE Demonstration of the American Com-
bustion Pyretron Oxygen-Enhanced Burner.
See 1299
PYROLYSIS
Engineering Bulletin: Pyrolysis Treatment.
See 1234
QUALITY ASSURANCE
Quality and Environmental Protection: The
EPA QA Program.
See 0990
Quality Assurance/Quality Control Guidance
for Removal Activities: Sampling QA/QC
Plan and Data Validation Procedures.
See 0993
Rationale for the Assessment of Errors in
the Sampling of Soils.
See 1526
QUALITY CONTROL
Quality Assurance/Quality Control Guidance
for Removal Activities: Sampling QA/QC
Plan and Data Validation Procedures.
See 0993
Regional Quality Control Guidance for NPL
Candidate Sites.
See 0376
QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS
Metals Testing Report: Metal Content of En-
vironmental Samples from Region 4.
See 1282
RADIOACTIVE CONTAMINATION
Environmental Characteristics of EPA, NRG,
and DOE Sites Contaminated with Radioac-
tive Substances.
See 1237
RADIOACTIVE ISOTOPES
Characterization of Contaminated Soil from
the Montclair/Glen Ridge, New Jersey, Su-
perfund Sites.
See 1493
RADIOACTIVE MATERIALS
Babcock and Wilcox Cyclone Furnace Vitrifi-
cation. Technology Demonstration Summary.
See 1203
Guidance for Data Useability in Risk Assess-
ment (Part B).
See 1034
Removal of Radionuclides by Electrokinetic
Soil Processing.
See 1531
Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Clean-
up Efforts Nationwide, Spring 1993 (Radium
Chemical Site Profile, Queens, New York).
See 0959
RADIOACTIVE WASTE DISPOSAL
Characterization Protocol for Radioactive
Contaminated Soils.
See 1494
RADIOACTIVE WASTE MANAGEMENT
Implementation Plan for the Record of Deci-
sion for Disposal of Hanford Defense High-
Level, Transuranic, and Tank Wastes.
See 1266
Meeting Summary: National Advisory Council
on Environmental Policy and Technology
(1st). Subcommittee on Radiation Cleanup
Regulation. Held in Washington, DC. on Oc-
tober 18-19, 1993.
See 1059
RADIOACTIVE WASTES
Assessment of Technologies for the Reme-
diation of Radioactively Contaminated Su-
perfund Sites.
See 1198
Computer Models Used to Support Cleanup
Decision-Making at Hazardous and Radioac-
tive Waste Sites.
See 1218
Environmental Characteristics of EPA, NRC,
and DOE Sites Contaminated with Radioac-
tive Substances.
See 1237
Harmonization of QA Procedures for Envi-
ronmental Data Operations: Development of
a National Consensus Standard for Quality
Assurance for Environmental Programs.
See 0989
Health Effects Assessment Summary
Tables.
See 1051
Health Effects Assessment Summary
Tables.
See 1052
Health Effects Assessment Summary
Tables.
See 1053
Health Effects Assessment Summary Tables
Fourth Quarter FY 1989.
See 1054
Issues Paper on Radiation Site Cleanup
Regulations.
See 1280
Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Clean-
up Efforts Nationwide, Fall 1992. (Lans-
downe Radioactive Residence Site Profile).
See 0946
RANKING
Regional Quality Control Guidance for NPL
Candidate Sites.
See 0376
Revised Hazard Ranking System (HRS):
Final Rule.
See 0380
REAL ESTATE
Real Estate Acquisition Procedures for
USAGE Projects.
See 1133
SU-67
-------
REAL-TIME AIR MONITORS
SUBJECT INDEX
REAL-TIME AIR MONITORS
Alr/Suporfund National Technical Guidance
Study Series: Compilation of Information on
Real-Time Air Monitoring for Use at Super-
fund Sites.
JSM1377 ,'„;, , ":
REAL TIME OPERATIONS '" ' '
tffarjiewprk, for' Real-Tlme Decision-Making:
"-"New Bedford HaSpr Hot Dredging Study.
Sue 1587
REAUTHORIZATION ISSUES
Suporfund Policy Forum Update, Volume 1,
Number 1, February 1992.
See 0324
RECORD OF DECISION
Compendium of ROD Language for FY 1993
;„ Focus Aieas, I'" '„",
$M JQ&3.
Evaluation of, and Additional Guidance on,
Issuance of Unilateral Administrative Orders
(JJAOa) for RD/RA.
See 0538
Gutdo to Developing Superfund No Action,
' Ipejfm Action,, and Contingency Remedy
TROOs.
Sao 1098
Model Administrative Order on Consent for
Removal Actions.
Sea 0574
ROD Annual Report, FY 1989.
See 1111
ROD Annual Report, FY1991. Volume 2.
See 1114
BOO Annual Report, FY 1992.
Soo 1115
Waiver of Headquarters Approval for Issu-
ance of RD/RA Special Notice Letters at the
Thne of ROD Signature from OERR and
OWE.
See 0893
RECORDS MANAGEMENT
Superfund Information Repositories and Ad-
i mlnislrative Records: Introduction for Librar-
ians. "' ' '"
;,§§«, 0497
REggRDS Op,DECISION ^"n^
;"§uggested' ROD Language for Various
Ground Water Remediation Options.
See 1476
RECOVERY
Guide for Conducting Treatability Studies
under CERCLA: Soil Vapor Extraction. Inter-
im Guidance.
See 1163
REFUSE DISPOSAL
Redetegatlon of Civil Judicial Settlement Au-
thorities under Delegation 14-13-B and 14-
14-E
See 0593
.Revision of CERCLA Civil Judicial Settje-
' merit Authorities under Delegations 14-13-B
and 14-14-E.
See 0602
Waiver of Concurrence on De Minimis Gen-
erator Settlements.
See 0892
REGION 1 ," '.'. "I . ' ' .
: Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)
(Region 1) (for Microcomputers).
See 0850
REGION 10
= Sjle Enforcement Trackjng System (SETS)
(Region 10) (for Microcomputers).
See 0868
REGION 2
iSfte Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)
(Region 2) (lor Microcomputers).
See 0852
REGION 3
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)
(Region 3) (for Microcomputers).
See 0854
REGION 4
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)
(Region 4) (for Microcomputers).
See 0856
REGION 5
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)
(Region 5) (for Microcomputers).
See 0858
REGION 6
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)
(Region 6) (for Microcomputers).
See 0860
REGION 7
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)
(Region 7) (for Microcomputers).
See 0862
REGION 8
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)
(Region 8) (for Microcomputers).
See 0864
REGION 9
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)
(Region 9) (for Microcomputers).
See 0866
REGIONAL ANALYSIS
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)
(National).
See 0611
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)
(National) (for Microcomputers).
See 0613
REGIONAL DECISION TEAM
SACM Regional Decision Teams: Interim
Guidance. Volume 1, Number 5, December
1992.
See 0111
REGIONAL PLANNING
ARCS (Alternative Remedial Contract Strate-
gy) Contracts Users'Manual.
See 0019
REGULATIONS
Accelerated Response at NPL Sites Guid-
ance (Superfund Management Review: Rec-
ommendation No. 22).
See 0082
Analysis of Treatability Data for Soil and
Debris: Evaluation of Land Ban Impact on
Use of Superfund Treatment Technologies.
See 1488
CERCLA Off-Site Policy - Eligibility of Facili-
ties in Assessment Monitoring.
See 0414
CERCLA Off-Site Policy: Providing Notice to
Facilities.
See 0415
CERCLIS Data Handling Support Policy
Statement.
See 0013
Decentralization of Superfund Bottle Reposi-
tory Functions.
See 0985
Discharge of Wastewater from CERCLA
Sites into POTWS.
See 0421
Facility Response Plans.
See 0929
Guidance on Oversight of PRP Performed
RD/RA.
See 1130
Index to the Monthly Hotline Report Ques-
tions (June 1982 to December 1991).
See 0139
Inside the Hotline: A Compilation of 1991
Monthly Hotline Reports.
See 0140
Inside the Hotline: A Compilation of 1992
Monthly Hotline Reports.
See 0141
Involvement of Superfund Program Manag-
ers in Superfund Response Agreement
Audits.
See 0099
Model Performance Standards for Superfund
Project Officers, Deputy Project Officers, and
Work Assignment Managers/Delivery Order
Officers.
See 0045
OSWER Integrated Health and Safety Policy.
See 0920
Planning for Sufficient Community Relations
(Superfund Management Review: No. 43A).
See 0108
Revised Interim Final Guidance on Indian In-
volvement in the Superfund Program.
See 0484
Superfund Analytical Review and Oversight.
See 0995
Use of Office of Research and Develop-
ment's Bioremediation Expertise in Super-
fund Removal Program.
See 1016
REIMBURSEMENTS
EPA/USACE Payment Process: Direct Cite/
Revised Reimbursement Methods.
See 1126
REMEDIAL ACTION
Accessing Federal Data Bases for Contami-
nated Site Clean-Up Technologies (Second
Edition).
See 1189
Accessing the $50 Million Set-Aside in the
Remedial Action Budget for Quick Response
at National Priorities List Sites.
See 1082
Additional Guidance on 'Worst Sites' and
'NPL Caliber Sites' to Assist in SACM Imple-
mentation.
See 0083
Administrative Order on Consent for Reme-
dial Investigations/Feasibility Study.
See 0510
Advancing the Use of Treatment Technol-
ogies for Superfund Remedies.
See 1191
Air/Superfund National Technical Guidance
Study Series. Air Stripper Design Manual.
See 1374
Air/Superfund National Technical Guidance
Study Series: Applicability of Open Path
Monitors for Superfund.
See 1375
Air/Superfund National Technical Guidance
Study Series. Comparisons of Air Stripper
Simulations and Field Performance Data.
See 1376
Air/Superfund National Technical Guidance
Study Series. Development of Example Pro-
cedures for Evaluating the Air Impacts of
Soil Excavation Associated with Superfund
Remedial Actions.
See 1380
Air/Superfund National Technical Guidance
Study Series. Emission Factors for Super-
fund Remediation Technologies.
See 1381
Air/Superfund National Technical Guidance
Study Series: Estimation of Air Impacts for
Air Stripping of Contaminated Water.
See 1382
SU-68
-------
SUBJECT INDEX
REMEDIAL ACTION
Air/Superfund National Technical Guidance
Study Series: Estimation of Air Impacts for
Soil Vapor Extraction (SVE) Systems.
See 1383
Air Superfund National Technical Guidance
Study Series. Estimation of Air Impacts for
the Excavation of Contaminated Soil.
See 1384
Air/Superfund National Technical Guidance
Study Series. Guideline for Predictive Base-
line Emissions Estimation Procedures for Su-
perfund Sites.
See 1387
Air Superfund National Technical Guidance
Study Series. Screening Procedures for Esti-
mating the Air Impacts of Incineration at Su-
perfund Sites.
See 1389
Alternative Biological Treatment Processes
for Remediation of Creosote-and PGP-Con-
taminated Materials: Bench-Scale Treatabil-
ity Studies.
See 1418
American Combustion Pyretron Destruction
System. Applications Analysis Report.
See 1193
Analysis of State Superfund Programs: 50-
State Study, 1990 Update.
See 0448
Analysis of Treatability Data for Soil and
Debris: Evaluation of Land Ban Impact on
Use of Superfund Treatment Technologies.
See 1488
ARAR's Q's and A's. Compliance with the
Toxiclty Characteristics Rule. Part 1.
See 0396
ARARs Q's and A's.
See 0398
ARCS Construction Contract Modification
Procedures.
See 0020
Assessing Sites under SACM: Interim Guid-
ance. Volume 1, Number 4, Deccember
1992.
See 0084
Assessment of International Technologies
for Superfund Applications: Technology
Review and Trip Report Results. •
See 1197
Basic Concepts of Contaminant Sorption at
Hazardous Waste Sites (Ground Water
Issue).
See 1431
Bioremediation: An Information Update on
Applying Bioremediation to Site Cleanup.
See 1421
Bioremediation in the Field. An Information
Update on Applying Bioremediation to Site
Clean-Up. Number 3.
See 1422
Bioremediation in the Field: An Information
Update on Applying Bioremediation to Site
Cleanup. (Number 4).
See 1423
Bioremediation in the Field: Number 1, No-
vember 1990.
See 1424
CERCLA Compliance with Other Laws
Manual: Overview of ARARs - Focus on
ARAR Waivers.
See 0408
CERCLA Compliance with Other Laws
Manual. Part 1. Interim Final.
See 0409
CERCLA Compliance with the RCRA Toxici-
ty Characteristics (TC) Rule: Part 2.
See 0412
CERCLA Off-Site Policy - Eligibility of Facili-
ties in Assessment Monitoring.
See 0414
CERCLA Off-Site Policy: Providing Notice to
Facilities.
See 0415
CERCLA Waste Capacity Assurance.
See 0131
Characterizing soils for hazardous waste site
assessments.
See 1495
Chemical Enhancements to Pump-and-Treat
Remediation. Ground Water Issue.
See 1434
Chemical Oxidation Treatment. Engineering
Bulletin.
See 1211
Commencement Bay Nearshore/Tideflats
Feasibility Study. Development of Sediment
Cleanup Goals.
See 1578
Commencement Bay Nearshore/Tideflats
Feasibility Study. Executive Summary.
See 1579
Commencement Bay Nearshore/Tideflats
Feasibility Study. Volume 1.
See 1580
Commencement Bay Nearshore/Tideflats
Feasibility Study. Volume 2. Appendices.
See 1581
Comparative Analysis of Remedies Selected
in the Superfund Program during FY 87, FY
88 and FY 89.
See 0519
Compendium of CERCLA ARARs fact
sheets and directives.
See 0417
Compendium of ROD Language for FY 1993
Focus Areas.
See 1083
Compliance with Third Third Requirements
Under the LDRs. Superfund LDR Guide No.
8.
See 0418
Considerations in Ground-Water Remedi-
ation at Superfund Sites and RCRA Facili-
ties: Update.
See 1437
Control of Air Emissions from Materials Han-
dling during Remediation. Engineering Bulle-
tin.
See 1398
Control Technologies for Defunct lead Bat-
tery Recycling Sites: Overview and Recent
Developments. Volume 3.
See 1220
Data Quality Objectives for Remedial Re-
sponse Activities: Development Process. Ex-
ample Scenario: RI/FS Activities at a Site
with Contaminated Soils and Ground Water.
See 0980
Demonstration of a Trial Excavation at the
McColl Superfund Site.
See 1226
Demonstration of Waste Treatment Technol-
ogies.
See 1229
Development of Electro-Acoustic Soil De-
contamination (ESD) Process for In situ Ap-
plications.
See 1498
Developments in Chemical Treatment of
Contaminated Soil.
See 1499
Discharge of Wastewater from CERCLA
Sites into POTWS.
See 0421
Early Action and Long-Term Action under
SACM: Interim Guidance, Volume 1, Number
2, December 1992.
See 0089
ECO Update. Volume 1, Number 3. The
Role of Natural Resource Trustees in the
Superfund Process.
See 1021
ECO Update. Volume 1, Number 4. Develop-
ing a Work Scope for Ecological Assess-
ments.
See 1022
Emergency Responders Agreements for
Fund-Lead Remedial Actions.
See 1001
Enforcement under SACM: Interim Guid-
ance. Volume 1, Number 3, December 1992.
See 0090
Engineering Bulletin: Pyrolysis Treatment.
See 1234
EPA/Navy CERCLA Remedial Action Tech-
nology Guide.
See 1241
Evaluation of Alternative Treatment Technol-
ogies for CERCLA Soils and Debris (Summa-
ry of Phase 1 and Phase 2).
See 1504
Evaluation of, and Additional Guidance on,
Issuance of Unilateral Administrative Orders
(UAOs) for RD/RA.
See 0538
Evaluation of Cleanup Levels for Remedial
Action at CERCLA (Comprehensive Environ-
mental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) Sites Based on a Review of EPA
(Environmental Protection Agency) Records
of Decision.
See 1245
Evaluation of Ground-Water Extraction Rem-
edies: Phase 2. Volume 1. Summary Report.
See 1444
Evaluation of Ground-Water Extraction Rem-
edies: Phase 2. Volume 2. Case Studies and
Updates.
See 1445
Exemptions from the Statutory Limits on Re-
moval Actions.
See 1002
Expediting Remedial Construction.
See 1127
Feasibility Study: Detailed Analysis of Reme-
dial Action Alternatives.
See 1088
Feasibility Study: Development and Screen-
ing of Remedial Action Alternatives.
See 1089
Final Guidance on Implementation of the
'Consistency' Exemption to the Statutory
Limits on Removal Actions.
See 1004
Final Policy on Setting RI/FS Priorities.
See 1090
Funding of State Enforcement Related Ac-
tivities.
See 0474
Getting Ready: Scoping the RI/FS.
See 1092
Granular Activated Carbon Treatment. Engi-
neering Bulletin.
See 1258
Ground-Water Issue: Soil sampling and anal-
ysis for volatile organic compounds.
See 1507
Guidance on EPA Oversight of Remedial De-
signs and Remedial Actions Performed by
Potentially Responsible Parties.
See 1128
Guidance on Expediting Remedial Design
and Remedial Action.
See 1129
Guidance on Implementation of the 'Contrib-
ute to Remedial Performance' Provision.
See 1093
Guidance on Oversight of Potentially Re-
sponsible Party Remedial Investigations and
Feasibility Studies. Volume 1.
See 1094
SU-69
-------
REMEDIAL ACTION
SUBJECT INDEX
Ihiiili i • C «'1i in1,,;:!!!!::!, „ i ', i '"'
Guidance on Oversight of Potentially Re-
sponsible Party Remedial Investigations and
Feasibility Studies. Volume 2. Appendices.
,8691095
fiuldance on Oversight of PRP Performed
RD/RA.
Sea 1130
Guide for Conducting Treatability Studies
under CERCLA.
See 1154
Guide for Conducting Treatability Studies
"uodof CERCLA.
Sea 1155
Guide for Conducting Treatability Studies
under CERCLA: Soil Washing. Interim Guid-
anot.
See 1165
Guide for Conducting Treatability Studies
under CERCLA: Sofl Washing: Quick Refer-
""ence Fact Sheet.
S«a1166
GuWa for Conducting Treatability Studies
under CERCLA; Thefmal Desorption
Remedy Selection. Interim Guidance.
Soa 1170
Guide on Remedial Actions at Superfund
Sites with PCS Contamination.
Sea 1282
Guide to Selecting Superfund Remedial Ac-
tions,
Sea 1100
HSEO SACM Report. Volume 1. Number 1,
January 1993.
See 0096
Hydraulic Fracturing Technology: Technolo-
gy Evaluation Report and Application Analy-
sis Report.
See 1265,
Implementation of the Decentralized Con-
tractor Performance Evaluation and Award
Fee Process for Selected Remedial Program
Contracts.
See 0031
in-sflu Btoremediatton of Contaminated
Ground Water.
See 1465
Sh-sfcj Stabilization/Solidification of PCS
(Potychlorinated Biphenyls)-Contaminated
Sod.
See 1556
In situ Treatment of Contaminated Ground
, Water: An Inventory of Research and Reid
Demonstrations and Strategies for Improving
Ground Water Remediation Technologies.
See 1466
Innovative Technology: Slurry-Phase Biode-
- gradation.'
See 1271
Innovative Treatment Technologies: Over-
view and Guide to Information Sources.
See 1272
Innovative Treatment Technologies: Semi-
Annual Status Report (Fourth Edition).
Sea 1273
I Innovative Treatment Technologies: Semi-
Annual Status Report. (Third Edition).
See 1275
Jf)tertm GuWanc¥on Potentially Responsible
" "Party Participation1 in Remedial Investigations
and Feasibility Studies.
See 0561
Interim RCRA/CERCLA Guidance on Non-
11; Contiguous Sites and On-Slte Management
on Waste and Treatment Residue.
See 0427
International Evaluation of In-situ Biorestora-
tion of Contaminated Soil and Groundwater
! (September 1990)-Translation.
See 1517
inventory of Treatability Study Vendors.
Volume 1.
Soa 1171
SU-70
Involvement of Superfund Program Manag-
ers in Superfund Response Agreement
Audits.
See 0099
Issuance of Administrative Orders for Imme-
diate Removal Actions.
See 0567
Liability of Corporate Shareholders and Suc-
cessor Corporations for Abandoned Sites
Under the Comprehensive Environmental
Response, Compensation and Liability Act.
See 0570
Literature Review Summary of Metals Ex-
traction Processes Used to Remove Lead
from Soils.
See 1518
Literature Survey of Innovative Technologies
for Hazardous Waste Site Remediation,
1987-1991.
See 1281
Making Superfund Documents Available to
the Public throughout the Cleanup Process,
and Discussing Site Findings and Decisions
as They are Developed (Superfund Manage-
ment Review: No. 43 G, H, Q, R, T).
See 0100
Measurement of Volatile Organic Com-
pounds during Start-Up of Bioremediation of
French Limited Superfund Site in Crosby
Texas Using Wind Dependent Whole-Air
Sampling.
See 1414
Model Administrative Order on Consent for
Removal Actions.
See 0574
Model Statement of Work for a Remedial
Investigation and Feasibility Study Conduct-
ed by Potentially Responsible Parties.
See 0578
Municipal Settlements.
See 0583
Obtaining a Soil and Debris Treatability Vari-
ance for Removal Actions. Superfund LDR
Guide No. 6B.
See 0430
Options for Developing and Evaluating Miti-
gation Strategies for Indoor Air Impacts at
CERCLA Sites. Air/Superfund National
Technical Guidance Study Series, Report
ASF-36.
See 1415
Policy for Superfund Compliance with the
RCRA Land Disposal Restrictions.
See 0436
Potential for Joint Research between EPA
and the U.S. Army.
See 1293
Quality Assurance/Quality Control Guidance
for Removal Activities: Sampling QA/QC
Plan and Data Validation Procedures.
See 0993
Reductive Dehalogenation of Organic Con-
taminants in Soils and Ground Water.
Ground Water Issue.
See 1527
Remedial Action, Treatment, and Disposal of
Hazardous Waste. Proceedings of the
Annual Hazardous Waste Research Sympo-
sium (17th). Held in Cincinnati, Ohio on April
9-11,1991.
See 1135
Remedial Investigation: Site Characterization
and Treatability Studies.
See 1106
Asymmetric Loss Function for Superfund Re-
mediation Decisions.
See 1200
Bench-Scale Evaluation of Alternative Bio-
logical Treatment Processes for the Remedi-
ation of Pentachiorophenol- and Creosote-
Contaminated Materials: Slurry-Phase Biore-
mediation.
See 1419
Bench-Scale Evaluation of Alternative Bio-
logical Treatment Processes for the Remedi-
ation of Pentachiorophenol- and Creosote-
Contaminated Materials: Solid-Phase Biore-
mediation.
See 1420
Chemical Stabilization of Mixed Organic and
Metal Compounds. EPA SITE Program Dem-
onstration of the Silicate Technology Corpo-
ration Process.
See 1212
Cost Estimating Systems for Remedial
Action Projects.
See 1123
Engineering Bulletins: Aids to the Develop-
ment of Remedial Alternatives.
See 1236
EPA SITE Demonstration of the International
Waste Technologies/Geo-Con In situ Stabili-
zation/Solidification Process.
See 1553
EPA Site Demonstration of the Terra Vac In
situ Vacuum Extraction Process in Grove-
land, Massachusetts. (Site Program Update:
Part VII).
See 1243
Extraction and Recovery of Lead Species
from Soil.
See 1506
Factors Affecting the Applicability of Plasma
Systems to the Cleanup of Superfund Sites.
See 1250
Incineration Treatment of Arsenic-Contami-
nated Soil.
See 1268
Management Systems Review of the Super-
fund RI/FS: Opportunities for Streamlining.
See 1101
PAST: The Potential ARARs Selection Tool.
See 0434
Results from the Stabilization Technologies
Evaluated by the Site Program. New Eng-
land Environmental Expo 90.
See 1558
SITE Demonstration of the CHEMFIX Solidi-
fication/Stabilization Process at the Portable
Equipment Salvage Company Site.
See 1559
Solidification/Stabilization: Is It Always Ap-
propriate.
See 1560
Sorption, Important in Stabilized/Solidified
Waste Forms.
See 1563
U.S. EPA SITE Demonstration of AWD Tech-
nologies' AquaDetox/SVE System.
See 1363
Use of Electrokinetics for Hazardous Waste
Site Remediation.
See 1366
Revised Interim Final Guidance on Indian In-
volvement in the Superfund Program.
See 0484
ROD Annual Report, FY 1989.
See 1111
ROD Annual Report, FY 1992.
See1115
SACM Regional Decision Teams: Interim
Guidance. Volume 1, Number 5, December
1992.
See 0111
-------
SUBJECT INDEX
REMEDIAL ACTION
Scoper's Notes: An RI/FS Costing Guide.
Bringing in a Quality RI/FS on Time and
Within Budget.
See 1117
Sector Sampling for VOC's during Remedi-
ation of Superfund Site at Shaver's Farm,
Georgia.
See 1417
Selection of Control Technologies for Reme-
diation of Lead Battery Recycling Sites. (En-
gineering Bulletin).
See 1298
SITE Emerging Technologies Project: Bab-
cock and Wilcox Cyclone Vitrification.
See 1303
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
Frequency by Party Name Report.
See 0607
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
Frequency by Party Name Report.
See 0608
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)
(National).
See 0611
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
National Alphabetical Report by PRP Name,
September 26, 1991.
See 0612
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)
(National) (for Microcomputers).
See 0613
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
National Frequency by PRP Name Report.
See 0614
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
National PRP Listing Alphabetically by PRP
Name.
See 0615
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
National PRP Listing Alphabetically by PRP
Name.
See 0616
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
National PRP Listing by Site.
See 0617
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
National PRP Listing by Site.
See 0618
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)
(National - 3 1/2 Inch Diskette, IBM PS/2
Compatible) (for Microcomputers).
See 0620
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Alabama.
See 0621
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Alabama.
See 0622
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for American Samoa.
See 0624
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for American Samoa.
See 0625
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Arizona.
See 0627
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Arizona.
See 0628
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Arkansas.
See 0630
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Arkansas.
See 0631
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for California.
See 0633
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for California.
See 0634
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Colorado.
See 0636
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Colorado.
See 0637
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Connecticut.
See 0639
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Connecticut.
See 0640
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Delaware.
See 0642
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Delaware.
See 0643
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Florida.
See 0645
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Florida.
See 0646
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Georgia.
See 0648
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Georgia.
See 0649
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Idaho.
See 0651
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Idaho.
See 0652
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Illinois.
See 0654
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Illinois.
See 0655
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Indiana.
See 0657
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Indiana.
See 0658
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Iowa.
See 0660
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Iowa.
See 0661
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Kansas.
See 0663
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Kansas.
See 0664
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Kentucky.
See 0666
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Kentucky.
See 0667
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Louisiana.
See 0669
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Louisiana.
See 0670
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Maine.
See 0672
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Maine.
See 0673
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Maryland.
See 0675
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Maryland.
See 0676
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Massachusetts.
See 0678
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Massachusetts.
See 0679
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Michigan.
See 0681
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Michigan.
See 0682
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Minnesota.
See 0684
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Minnesota.
See 0685
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Mississippi.
See 0687
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Mississippi.
See 0688
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Missouri.
See 0690
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Missouri.
See 0691
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Montana.
See 0693
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Montana.
See 0694
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Nebraska.
See 0696
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Nebraska.
See 0697
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Nevada.
See 0699
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Nevada.
See 0700
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for New Hampshire.
See 0702
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for New Hampshire.
See 0703
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for New Jersey.
See 0705
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for New Jersey.
See 0706
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for New Mexico.
See 0708
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for New Mexico.
See 0709
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for New York.
See 0711
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for New York.
See 0712
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for North Carolina.
See 0714
SU-71
-------
REMEDIAL ACTION
SUBJECT INDEX
SJta Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP LfstJng by Site for North Carolina.
Soe0715
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for North Dakota.
Sea 0717
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for North Dakota.
|, Se« Q718
I Site Enforcement "Tracing'System (SETS):
! PRP Listing by Site for Northern Marianas.
Sea 0720
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
1 PRP Listing by Site for Northern Marianas.
Soe0721
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Ohto.
See 0723
".Slta Enfo|pe,rnent Irackjrig System (SETS):
"" PRP Listing'by'SJtefofOhto.
Sea 0724
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Oklahoma.
Sea 0726
Sfta Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Oklahoma.
Sea 0727
i SHa Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Usting by Site for Oregon.
See 0729
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Usting by SHe for Oregon.
See 0730
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Usflng by Site for Pennsylvania.
See 0732
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Pennsylvania.
Sea 0733
Sjte Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Puerto Rico.
Sea 0735
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PflP Listing by Site for Puerto Rico.
See 0736
Stta Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 1.
See 0739
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 1. Volume 1.
Sea 0742
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Usting by Site for Region 2.
Sea 0744
SWa Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Usjing by Site for Region 2. Volume 2.
8680747,
1 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 3. Volume 3.
Sea 0751
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Usting by Stte for Region 4.
|j" Sea OJSIJ
Site Enforcement tracking System (SETS):
PRP Usting by Stte for Region 4. Volume 4.
Sea 075$
Slta Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Usting by Site for Region 5.
Sea 0758
Slta Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 5. Volume 5.
See 0761
Site Enforcement Trackjpg System (SETS):
.IPR:i?"UsUng"by"slte for Region 6.
Sea 0763
" Sita Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Usting by Site for Region 6. Volume 6.
See 0766
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 7.
See 0768
SO-72
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 7. Volume 7.
See 0771
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Usting by Site for Region 8.
See 0773
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 8. Volume 8.
See 0776
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 9.
See 0778
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Usting by Site for Region 9. Volume 9.
See 0781
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 10.
See 0783
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Usting by Site for Region 10. Volume
10.
See 0786
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Usting by Site for Rhode Island.
See 0787
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Rhode Island.
See 0788
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Usting by Site for South Carolina.
See 0790
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Usting by Site for South Carolina.
See 0791
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for South Dakota.
See 0793
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for South Dakota.
See 0794
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Usting by Site for Tennessee.
See 0796
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Usting by Site for Tennessee.
See 0797
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Texas.
See 0799
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Usting by Site for Texas.
See 0800
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Trust Territories.
See 0802
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Usting by Site for Trust Territories.
See 0803
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Usting by Site for Utah.
See 0805
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Utah.
See 0806
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Usting by Site for Vermont.
See 0808
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Usting by Site for Vermont.
See 0809
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Virginia.
See 0811
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Usting by Site for Washington.
See 0813
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Usting by Site for Washington.
See 0814
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Usting by Site for West Virginia.
See 0816
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for West Virginia.
See 0817
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Usting by Site for Wisconsin.
See 0819
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Wisconsin.
See 0820
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Usting by Site for Wyoming.
See 0822
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Usting by Site for Wyoming.
See 0823
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP National Usting Alphabetically by Party
Name.
See 0826
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP National Usting Alphabetically by Party
Name.
See 0827
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP National Usting Alphabetically by Party
Name.
See 0829
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP National Listing by Site.
See 0832
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP National Usting by Site.
See 0833
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP National Listing by Site.
See 0835
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Site Usting by Site for Virginia.
See 0848
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)
(Region 1-31/2 Inch Diskette IBM PS/2
Compatible) (for Microcomputers).
See 0849
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)
(Region 1) (for Microcomputers).
See 0850
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)
(Region 2-31/2 Inch Diskette IBM PS/2
Compatible) (for Microcomputers).
See 0851
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)
(Region 2) (for Microcomputers).
See 0852
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)
(Region 3-31/2 inch Diskette IBM PS/2
Compatible) (for Microcomputers).
See 0853
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)
(Region 3) (for Microcomputers).
See 0854
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)
(Region 4-31/2 Inch Diskette IBM PS/2
Compatible) (for Microcomputers).
See 0855
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)
(Region 4) (for Microcomputers).
See 0856
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)
(Region 5-31/2 Inch Diskette IBM PS/2
Compatible) (for Microcomputers).
See 0857
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)
(Region 5) (for Microcomputers).
See 0858
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)
(Region 6-3 1/2 Inch Diskette IBM PS/2
Compatible) (for Microcomputers).
See 0859
-------
SUBJECT INDEX
REMEDIAL ACTION
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)
(Region 6) (for Microcomputers).
See 0860
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)
(Region 7-31/2 Inch Diskette IBM PS/2
Compatible) (for Microcomputers).
See 0861
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)
(Region 7) (for Microcomputers).
See 0862
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)
(Region 8-31/2 Inch Diskette IBM PS/2
Compatible) (for Microcomputers).
See 0863
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)
(Region 8) (for Microcomputers).
See 0864
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)
(Region 9-3 1/2 Inch Diskette IBM PS/2
Compatible) (for Microcomputers).
See 0865
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)
(Region 9) (for Microcomputers).
See 0866
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)
(Region 10 - 3 1/2 Inch Diskette IBM PS/2
Compatible) (for Microcomputers).
See 0867
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)
(Region 10) (for Microcomputers).
See 0868
Solidification/Stabilization of Organics and
Inorganics.
See 1561
Soliditech, Inc. Solidification/Stabilization
Process: Applications Analysis Report.
See 1562
Some Major Factors Important in Establish-
ing Land Use Policy for Remediated Super-
fund Sites.
See 0308
Status of Key SACM Program Management
Issues: Interim Guidance, Volume 1, Number
1, December 1992.
See 0113
Streamlining the RI/FS for CERCLA Munici-
pal Landfill Sites.
See 1118
Streamlining the RI/FS for CERCLA Munici-
pal Landfill Sites.
See 1119
Suggested ROD Language for Various
Ground Water Remediation Options.
See 1475
Superfund Accelerated Cleanup Bulletin:
Presumptive Remedies for Municipal Landfill
Sites. Volume 2, Number 1, February 1993.
See 0115
Superfund Accelerated Cleanup Bulletin:
Presumptive Remedies for Wood Treatment
Facilities. Volume 1, Number 2, May 1992.
See 0116
Superfund Accelerated Cleanup Bulletin.
Volume 1, Number 3. Presumptive Reme-
dies.
See 0118
Superfund Accelerated Cleanup Model
(SACM): Questions and Answers.
See 0121
Superfund Accelerated Cleanup Model
(SACM). Volume 1, Number 4, November
1992.
See 0122
Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Clean-
up Efforts Nationwide, Fall 1992. (American
Thermostat Corporation, New York).
See 0942
Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Clean-
up Efforts Nationwide, Fall 1992. (Ciba-Geigy
Corporation, Mclntosh, Alabama).
See 0944
Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Clean-
up Efforts Nationwide, Fall 1992. (Krysowaty
Farm, Hillsborough, New Jersey).
See 0945
Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Clean-
up Efforts Nationwide, Fall 1992. (Valley of
the Drums, Bullitt County, Kentucky).
See 0947
Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Clean-
up Efforts Nationwide, Fall 1992. (Wide
Beach Section of Brant, New York).
See 0948
Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Clean-
up Efforts Nationwide, Spring 1993 (French
Limited Site Profile, Harris County, Texas).
See 0954
Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Clean-
up Efforts Nationwide, Spring 1993 (Old Mid-
land Products Site Profile, Yell County, Ar-
kansas).
See 0957
Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Clean-
up Efforts Nationwide, Spring 1993 (Radium
Chemical Site Profile, Queens, New York).
See 0959
Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Clean-
up Efforts Nationwide, Spring 1993 (United
Chrome Products Site Profile).
See 0961
Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Clean-
up Efforts Nationwide, Summer 1993 (Tri-
State Plating Site Profile, Columbus, Indi-
ana).
See 0970
Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Clean-
up Efforts Nationwide, Winter 1993. (Wells G
and H Site, Woburn, Massachusetts).
See 0972
Superfund Emergency Response Actions: A
Summary of Federally-Funded Removals.
Fifth Annual Report - Fiscal Year 1990.
See 0313
Superfund Emergency Response Actions: A
Summary of Federally-Funded Removals.
Sixth Annual Report, Fiscal Year 1991.
See 0315
Superfund Emergency Response Actions: A
Summary of Federally Funded Removals.
Volume 3.
See 0318
Superfund Engineering Issue: Issues Affect-
ing the Applicability and Success of Remedi-
al/Removal Incineration Projects.
See 1308
Superfund: Focusing on the Nation at Large.
A Decade of Progress at National Priorities
List Sites.
See 0322
Superfund Innovative Technology Evaluation
Program: Progress and Accomplishments,
Fiscal Year 1989. A Third Report to Con-
gress.
See 1311
Superfund Innovative Technology Evaluation
Program: Progress and Accomplishments,
Fiscal Year 1990. A Fourth Report to Con-
gress.
See 1312
Superfund Innovative Technology Evaluation
Program: Progress and Accomplishments
Fiscal Year 1991. A 5th Report to Congress.
See 1313
Superfund Innovative Technology Evaluation
Program: Technology Profiles, Fifth Edition.
See 1315
Superfund Innovative Technology Evaluation
Program: Technology Profiles, Fourth Edi-
tion.
See 1316
Superfund Innovative Technology Evaluation
Program: Technology Profiles, November
1989.
See 1317
Superfund LDR Guide No. 1: Overview of
RCRA Land Disposal Restrictions (LDRs).
See 0440
Superfund LDR Guide No. 2: Complying with
the California List Restrictions under Land
Disposal Restrictions (LDRs).
See 0441
Superfund LDR Guide No. 4: Complying with
the Hammer Restrictions under Land Dis-
posal Restrictions (LDRs).
See 0443
Superfund LDR Guide No. 6A (2nd Edition)
Obtaining a Soil and Debris Treatability Vari-
ance for Remedial Actions.
See 0445
Superfund Remedial Action Decision Proc-
ess: Database for Selected FY87 Records of
Decision.
See 1136
Superfund Removal Procedures: Action
Memorandum Guidance.
See 1012
Superfund: Report of the EPA Superfund
Revitalization Public Meeting Held on June
24, 1992. Volumes 1 and 2.
See 0333
Superfund Technical Assistance Grants.
See 0502
Superfund Technical Assistance Grants
(Fact Sheet).
See 0503
Superfund Technical Assistance Grants
(TAGs) (Pamphlet).
See 0505
Synopses of Federal Demonstrations of In-
novative Site Remediation Technologies.
See 1324
Tech Trends Number 3, December 1990.
See 1325
Tech Trends Number 4, March 1991. .
See 1326
Tech Trends Number 5, May 1991.
See 1327
Tech Trends Number 9, June 1992.
See 1329
Tech Trends (Number 10).
See 1330
Tech Trends (Number 11).
' See 1331
Tech Trends: The Applied Technologies
Journal for Superfund Removals and Reme-
dial Actions and RCRA Corrective Actions,
December 1993.
See 1332
Tech Trends: The Applied Technologies
Journal for Superfund Removals and Reme-
dial Actions and RCRA Corrective Actions.
May 1993.
See 1333
Technical Guidance Document: Construction
Quality Management for Remedial Action
and Remedial Design Waste Containment
Systems.
See 1334
Technology Demonstration Summary: Bio
Trol Soil Washing System for Treatment of a
Wood Preserving Site.
See 1538
Technology Demonstration Summary,
DuPont/Oberlin Microfiltration System, Pal-
merton, Pennsylvania. April-May 1992.
See 1336
SU-73
-------
REMEDIAL ACTION COST ESTIMATING SYSTEM SUBJECT INDEX
'technology Evaluation Report SITE Pro-
gram Demonstration of the DuPont/Oberlin
; Mksrofiltratfon Technology.
Soo1350
Technology Evaluation Report Site Program
^Demonstration ,,Test Accu}ech , Pneumatic
Fracturing Extraction arid Hot Gas injection,
Phase 1. Volume 1.
iSea'1352
Ten* Vac In situ Vacuum Extraction System:
Applications Analysis Report
See 1355
Toxic Treatments Mn-situ1 Steam/Hot-Air
Stripping Technology. Applications Analysis
Roport.
Sea 1545
Toxloologlcal Implementations of Remediat-
ing Hazardous Wastes.
See 1359
Ultrox Intornational Ultraviolet Radiation/Oxi-
dation technology: Applications Analysis
Report.
See 1364
USAGE Proplacod and Rapid Response
Contracts.
See 1139
Use of Office of Research and Develop-
ment's Btofemedtetion Expertise in Super-
rood Removal Program.
See 1016
Use of Removal Approaches to Speed Up
Remeotai Action Projects.
See 1140
Vendor Information System for Innovative
Treatment Technologies (VISITT). Number 1.
See 1370
REMEDIAL ACTION COST ESTIMATING
SYflEM
'Cost Estimating Systems for Remedial
Action Projects.
See 1123
REMEDIAL ACTIONS
CERCtA Site Discharges to POTWs: Guid-
ance Manual.
s«> 1676 ; ;;.;;. .';;;;
Suporfund Emergency Response Actions: A
Summary of Federally-Funded Removals.
Volume 1.
See 0316
Suporfund Emergency Response Actions: A
Summary of Federally-Funded Removals.
See 0317 ..................
REMEDIAL DESIGNS
[Guidance pri Expediting Remedial Design
and Remedial Action.
See 1129
Guidance on Oversight of PRP Performed
RD/RA.
See 1130
Technical Guidance Document Construction
Quality Management for Remedial Action
and Remedial Design Waste Containment
Systems.
See 1334
REMEDIAL INVESTIGATIONS
RI/FS Improvements Follow-Up.
See 1109 .........................
REMEDIAL PROJECT MANAGERS
• Characterizing soils for hazardous waste site
assessments.
..... Sea 1495
REMEDIAL RESPONSE
Snalysfs of State Superfund Programs: 50-
Stat» Study. 1990 Update.
See 0448
ARARs Q's and A's.
See 0393
ARCS (Alternative Remedial Contract Strate-
gy) Contracts Users' Manual.
See 0019
CERCLA Compliance with Other Laws
Manual. Part 1. Interim Final.
See Q409
Community Relations in Superfund: A Hand-
book.
See 0467
Data Quality Objectives for Remedial Re-
sponse Activities: Development Process. Ex-
ample Scenario: RI/FS Activities at a Site
with Contaminated Soils and Ground Water.
See 0980
Guide to Delisting of RCRA Wastes for Su-
perfund Remedial Responses.
See 0422
Handbook: Responding to Discharges of
Sinking Hazardous Substances.
See 1589
Political Subdivision Involvement in Super-
fund.
See 0479
Role of Community Interviews in the Devel-
opment of a Community Relations Program
for Remedial Response.
See 0485
Summary of Treatment Technology Effec-
tiveness for Contaminated Soil.
See 1533
Superfund Emergency Response Actions: A
Summary of Federally-Funded Removals.
Fifth Annual Report - Fiscal Year 1990.
See 0313
Superfund Emergency Response Actions: A
Summary of Federally Funded Removals.
Fourth Annual Report - Fiscal Year 1989.
See 0314
Superfund LDR Guide No. 5: Determining
When Land Disposal Restrictions (LDRs) Are
'Applicable' to CERCLA Response Actions.
See 0444
Superfund Removal Procedures: Action
Memorandum Guidance.
See 1012
REMEDIATION
Air/Superfund National Technical Guidance
Study Series: Estimation of Air Impacts from
Area Sources of Particulate Matter Emis-
sions at Superfund Sites.
See 1385
Control of Air Emissions from Superfund
Sites.
See 1400
EPA Engineering Issue: Technology Alterna-
tives for the Remediation of PCB-Contami-
nated Soil and Sediment.
See 1501
Estimation of Air Impacts for Bioventlng Sys-
tems Used at Superfund Sites. Air/Super-
fund National Technical Guidance Study
Series.
See 1407
Estimation of Air Impacts for Solidification
and Stabilization Processes Used at Super-
fund Sites. Air/Superfund National Technical
Guidance Study Series.
See 1408
Estimation of Air Impacts for Thermal De-
sorption Units Used at Superfund Sites. Air/
Superfund National Technical Guidance
Study Series.
See 1409
Guidance on Conducting Non-Time-Critical
Removal Actions under CERCLA.
See 1005
Health and Safety Plan (HASP) User's Guide
(Version 3.0/4.0).
See 0917
Presumptive Remedy for CERCLA Municipal
Landfill Sites.
See 1105
REMEDIATION GOALS
Risk Assessment Guidance for Superfund.
Volume 1. Human Health Evaluation Manual
(Part B).
See 1067
REMOTE SENSING
Use of a Fourier Transform Spectrometer as
a Remote Sensor at Superfund Sites.
See 1365
REMOVAL
Consideration of ARARs during Removal Ac-
tions.
See 0419
Removal Program Representative Sampling
Guidance. Volume 1. Soil.
See 1010
Revised Hazard Ranking System: Evaluating
Sites After Waste Removals.
See 0379
Superfund Emergency Response Actions: A
Summary of Federally-Funded Removals.
Volume 1.
See 0316
Superfund Emergency Response Actions: A
Summary of Federally-Funded Removals.
Volume 2.
See 0317
Superfund Removal Procedures: Action
Memorandum Guidance.
See 1012
Superfund Removal Procedures: Guidance
on the Consideration of ARARS during Re-
moval Actions.
See 1013
Superfund Removal Procedures: Public Par-
ticipation Guidance for On-Scene Coordina-
tors; Community Relations and the Adminis-
trative Record.
See 1014
Superfund Removal Procedures: Removal
Enforcement Guidance for On-Scene Coordi-
nators.
See 1015
REPA CONTRACTS
Roles and Responsibilities of Regional
Project Officers, Zone Project Officers, Work
Assignment Managers and Contracting Offi-
cers for the RCRA Enforcement, Permitting
and Assistance Contracts (REPA).
See 0070
REPORTING REQUIREMENTS
Assessing Reports of Continuous Releases
of Hazardous Substances: A Guide for EPA
Regions.
See 1142
Questions and Answers on Release Notifica-
tion Requirements and Reportable Quantity
Adjustments.
See 1149
Reporting Requirements for Continuous Re-
leases of Hazardous Substances: A Guide
for Facilities and Vessels on Compliance.
See 1150
REPOSITORIES
Superfund Information Repositories and Ad-
ministrative Records: Introduction for Librar-
ians.
See 0497
REPRESENTATIVE SAMPLING
Removal Program Representative Sampling
Guidance. Volume 1. Soil.
See1010
SU-74
-------
SUBJECT INDEX RISK REDUCTION ENGINEERING LABORATORY
RESEARCH
Potential for Joint Research between EPA
and the U.S. Army.
See 1293
RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT
Remedial Action, Treatment, and Disposal of
Hazardous Waste. Proceedings of the
Annual Hazardous Waste Research Sympo-
sium (17th). Held in Cincinnati, Ohio on April
9-11,1991.
See 1135
RESEARCH MANAGEMENT
Bibliography of Federal Reports and Publica-
tions Describing Alternative and Innovative
Treatment Technologies for Corrective
Action and Site Remediation.
See 1206
RESEARCH PROJECTS
Abstracts of Phase 1 and Phase 2 Awards:
Small Business Innovation Research Pro-
gram 1991.
See 0016
EPA/ORD (Environmental Protection
Agency/Office of Research and Develop-
ment) Role and Perspective in Sediment Re-
search.
See 1585
Operations and Research at the U.S. EPA
Incineration Research Facility: Annual
Report for FY89.
See 1482
Operations and Research at the U.S. EPA
Incineration Research Facility: Annual
Report for FY92.
See 1485
OSWER Comparative Risk Project. Execu-
tive Summary and Overview.
See 1062
RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS
Homeowners Exempted from Superfund
Cleanup Costs: National Policy Overview.
See 0426
Policy Towards Owners of Residential Prop-
erty at Superfund Sites.
See 0587
RESOURCE CONSERVATION AND
RECOVERY ACT
CERCLA Compliance with Other Laws
Manual: RCRA ARARS-Focus on Closure
Requirements.
See 0410
Guidance for Environmental Priorities Initia-
tive (EPI) Facilities in the Superfund Pre-Re-
medial Program.
See 0341
Tech Trends (Number 11).
See 1331
REVIEWS
Superfund Program: Ten Years of Progress.
See 0977
REVISIONS
Superfund Guide to RCRA Management Re-
quirements for Mineral Processing Wastes.
See 0439
RHODE ISLAND
National Priorities List Sites: Rhode Island.
See 0262
National Priorities List Sites: Rhode Island.
See 0263
National Priorities List Sites: Rhode Island,
1992.
See 0264
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Rhode Island.
See 0737
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Rhode Island.
See 0788
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Rhode Island.
See 0789
RISK
Achieving Greater Consistency between
Subjective and Objective Risks.
See 1017
Communicating with the Public About Haz-
ardous Materials: An Examination of Local
Practice. Risk Communication Series.
See 0464
Nature and Extent of Ecological Risks at Su-
perfund Sites and RCRA (Resource Conser-
vation and Recovery Act) Facilities (Execu-
tive Summary Included).
See 1060
SARA (Superfund Amendments and Reau-
thorization Act) Section 313 Roadmaps Data
Base. User's Manual. Version 2.10.
See 0304
RISK ASSESSMENT
Additional Guidance on 'Worst Sites' and
'NPL Caliber Sites' to Assist in SACM Imple-
mentation.
See 0083
Air/Superfund National Technical Guidance
Series. Superfund Air Pathway Analyses
Review Criteria Checklists.
See 1372
Air/Superfund National Technical Guidance
Study Series. Volume 1. Overview of Air
Pathway Assessments for Superfund Sites
(Revised).
See 1391
ATSDR Health Consultations under
CERCLA.
See 1018
AutoMOUSE: An Improvement to the
MOUSE Computerized Uncertainty Analysis
System Operational Manual.
See 1201
Criteria for Choosing Indicator Species for
Ecological Risk Assessments at Superfund
Sites (90-6402).
See 1224
Determination of Imminent and Substantial
Endangerment for Removal Actions.
See 1000
Endangerment Assessment Handbook.
See 0530
Field Standard Operating Procedures for Air
Surveillance F.S.O.P. No. 8.
See 0910
Field Standard Operating Procedures for Es-
tablishing Work Zones (F.S.O.P. 6).
See 0911
Field Standard Operating Procedures for
Preparation of a Site Safety Plan F.S.O.P.
No. 9.
See 0912
Framework for Real-Time Decision-Making:
New Bedford Harbor Pilot Dredging Study.
See 1587
Future Land Use Scenarios for Federal Fa-
cilities.
See 0897
Guidance for Data Useability in Risk Assess-
ment.
See 1030
Guidance for Data Useability in Risk Assess-
ment Interim Report.
See 1032
Guidance for Data Useability in Risk Assess-
ment (Part A).
See 1033
Guidance for Data Useability in Risk Assess-
ment (Part B).
See 1034
Guidance on Conducting Non-Time-Critical
Removal Actions under CERCLA.
See 1005
Integrating Removal and Remedial Site As-
sessment Investigations.
See 0939
Issues Paper on Radiation Site Cleanup
Regulations.
See 1280
Methodology for Evaluating Potential Car-
cinogenicity in Support of Reportable Quanti-
ty Adjustments Pursuant to CERCLA Section
102.
See 1146
New Policy on Performance of Risk Assess-
ments during Remedial Investigation Feasi-
bility Studies (RI/FS) Conducted by Poten-
tially Responsible Parties (PRPs).
See 1061
OSWER Comparative Risk Project. Execu-
tive Summary and Overview.
See 1062
Recent Advances in Risk Reduction Engi-
neering.
See 1064
Risk Assessment Guidance for Superfund.
Volume 1. Human Health Evaluation Manual.
Part A.
See 1065
Risk Assessment Guidance for Superfund.
Volume 1. Human Health Evaluation Manual.
Part A, April 1990.
See 1066
Risk Assessment Guidance for Superfund.
Volume 1. Human Health Evaluation Manual
(Part C).
See 1069
Risk Assessment Guidance for Superfund.
Volume 1. Human Health Evaluation Manual.
Supplemental Guidance: 'Standard Default
Exposure Factors'.
See 1071
Risk Assessment Guidance for Superfund.
Volume 2. Environmental Evaluation Manual.
See 1072
Risk Assessment in Superfund: A Primer.
First Edition, September 1990.
See 1073
Role of the Baseline Risk Assessment in
Superfund Remedy Selection Decisions.
See 1075
Superfund Remedial Action Decision Proc-
ess: Database for Selected FY87 Records of
Decision.
See 1136
Supplemental Guidance on Performing Risk
Assessments in Remedial Investigation/Fea-
sibility Studies (RI/FSs). Conducted by Po-
tentially Responsible Parties (PRPs).
See 1078
Supplemental Guide to Video on Superfund
Site Assessment Screening: A National Pri-
ority.
See 0394
Use of IRIS Values in Superfund Risk As-
sessment.
See 1081
RISK ASSESSMENT GUIDANCE FOR
SUPERFUND
Supplemental Guidance to RAGS: Calculat-
ing the Concentration Term. Volume 1,
Number 1, May 1992.
See 1079
RISK REDUCTION ENGINEERING
LABORATORY
Risk Reduction Engineering Laboratory Site
Remediation Technical Support Program:
FY92 Annual Report.
See 1296
SU-75
-------
ROBOTICS
SUBJECT INDEX
ROBOTICS
Personnel Protection through Reconnais-
sance Robotics at Superfund Remedial
Sites.
S««1286
ROBOTS ' ........... "
HeM AppticatJons of Robotic Systems in
Hazardous Environments, p1-29 1993. See
•ISO PB86-1 76344 and PB92-166743.
^Sae, 12,51 , , ,,,, ............... .......
ROTATING BIOLOGICAL CONTACTORS
Rotating Biological Contactors. Engineering
Bulletin.
,8991297
RUSH TOWNSHIP (PENNSYLVANIA)
'""Suporfund" at Work: Hazardous Waste Clean-
up Efforts Nationwide, Summer 1993 (East-
am Diversified Metals Site Profile, Schuylkill
County, Pennsylvania),
see 0966
SACM (SUPERFUND ACCELERATED
CLEANUP MODEL)
Expectations for Full Implementation of
SACM,
See 0092
Further Direction on Implementing the Su-
perfund Accelerated Cleanup Model (SACM).
See 0093
Suporfund Accelerated Cleanup Model
(SACM): Questions and Answers.
, ..... See 0121
SAFETY'
Health and Safety Audit Guidelines: SARA
Tjtto I. Section 126.
Sea 0916
'Health and Safety Roles and Responsibilities
at Remedial Sites.
,,
Standard Operating Safety Guides.
Soa0924
Standard Operating Safety Guides.
See 0925
SAID (SITE ASSESSMENT INFORMATION
DIRECTORY)
Site Assessment Information Directory
(SAID) Region 1 (for Microcomputers). Date
oT Coverage: October 1991.
See 0382
iSlta Assessment Information Directory
(SAID) Region 2 (for Microcomputers). Date
o( Coverage: October 1991.
Sea 0383
;,SJt8 Assessment Information Directory
(SAID) Region 3 (for Microcomputers). Date
of Coverage: October 1991.
See 0384
SKe Assessment Information Directory
(SAID) Region 4 (for Microcomputers). Date
of Coverage: October 1991.
See 0385
Site Assessment Information Directory
i, (SAID) Region 5 (for Microcomputers). Date
of Coverage: 1991.
'•See 0386 .......................................
Sita Assessment Information Directory
I $SAID) Region 6 (for Microcomputers). Date
..... of Coverage: October 1991.
See 0387
Site Assessment Information Directory
(SAID) Region 7 (for Microcomputers). Date
of Coverage: October 1991.
See 0388
Site Assessment Information Directory
(SAID) Region 8 (for Microcomputers). Date
of Coverage: 1991.
See 0389
Site Assessment Information Directory
(SAID) Region 9 (for Microcomputers). Date
of" Coverage: October 1991.
See 0390
Site Assessment Information Directory
(SAID) Region 10 (for Microcomputers). Date
of Coverage: October 1991.
See 0391
SALARY ADMINISTRATION
EPA/USACE Payment Process: Direct Cite/
Revised Reimbursement Methods.
See 1126
SAMPLE PREPARATION
Sampler's Guide to the Contract Laboratory
Program.
See 0071
SAMPLING
Air/Superfund National Technical Guidance
Study Series. Air Emissions from Area
Sources: Estimating Soil and Soil-Gas
Sample Number Requirements.
See 1373
Compendium of ERT Soil Sampling and Sur-
face Geophysics Procedures.
See 0904
Importance of Quality for Collection of Envi-
ronmental Samples. Planning, Implementing,
and Assessing Field Sampling Quality at
CERCLA Sites.
See 0919
Potential Sources of Error in Ground-Water
Sampling at Hazardous Waste Sites. Ground
Water Issue.
See 1472
Rationale for the Assessment of Errors in
the Sampling of Soils.
See 1526
Asymmetric Loss Function for Superfund Re-
mediation Decisions.
See 1200
SAMPLING BOTTLES
Decentralization of Superfund Bottle Reposi-
tory Functions.
See 0985
SBIR (SMALL BUSINESS INNOVATIVE
RESEARCH)
Abstracts of Phase 1 and Phase 2 Awards:
Small Business Innovation Research Pro-
gram 1991.
See 0016
SCHUYLKILL COUNTY (PENNSYLVANIA)
Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Clean-
up Efforts Nationwide, Summer 1993 (East-
ern Diversified Metals Site Profile, Schuylkill
County, Pennsylvania).
See 0966
SCRUBBERS
Engineered Biofilter for Removing Organic
Contaminants in Air.
See 1403
Potential Surrogate Metals for Incinerator
Trial Burns.
See 1486
Site Emerging Technologies: Bioscrubber for
Removing Hazardous Organic Emissions
from Soil, Water and Air Decontamination
Processes.
See 1302
SEDIMENT TRANSPORT
Evaluation of Unsaturated/Valdose Zone
Models for Superfund Sites.
See 1449
Identification and Compilation of Unsaturat-
ed/Vadose Zone Models.
See 1464
SEDIMENT-WATER INTERFACES
EPA/ORD (Environmental Protection
Agency/Office of Research and Develop-
ment) Role and Perspective in Sediment Re-
search.
See 1585
SEDIMENTS
Commencement Bay Nearshore/Tideflats
Feasibility Study. Development of Sediment
Cleanup Goals.
See 1578
Commencement Bay Nearshore/Tideflats
Feasibility Study. Executive Summary.
See 1579
Commencement Bay Nearshore/Tideflats
Feasibility Study. Volume 1.
See 1580
Commencement Bay Nearshore/Tideflats
Feasibility Study. Volume 2. Appendices.
See 1581
Compendium of ERT Surface Water and
Sediment Sampling Procedures.
See 0905
Dealing with Toxic Polluted Sediments in the
Great Lakes Basin.
See 1582
EPA/ORD (Environmental Protection
Agency/Office of Research and Develop-
ment) Role and Perspective in Sediment Re-
search.
See 1585
Pilot-Scale Incineration of PCB-Contaminat-
ed Sediments from the New Bedford Harbor
Hot Spot Superfund Site.
See 1292
Pilot-Scale incineration of PCB-Contaminat-
ed Sediments from the Hot Spot of the New
Bedford Harbor Superfund Site.
See 1291
Technology Evaluation Report: SITE Pro-
gram. CF Systems Organics Extraction
System, New Bedford, Massachusetts.
Volume 1.
See 1346
Technology Evaluation Report: SITE Pro-
gram. CF Systems Organics Extraction
System, New Bedford, Massachusetts.
Volume 2.
See 1347
SELENASTRUM CAPRICORNUTUM
Use of 'Selenastrum capricornutum' to
Assess the Toxicity Potential of Surface and
Ground Water Contamination Caused by
Chromium Waste.
See 1367
SEMOUR (INDIANA)
Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Clean-
up Efforts Nationwide, Winter 1994 (Sey-
mour Recycling Site Profile, Seymour, Indi-
ana).
See 0975
SEPARATION
Physical/Chemical Treatment of Hazardous
Waste Sites: Speaker Slide Copies and Sup-
porting Information.
See 1287
SEPARATION PROCESSES
Carver-Greenfield Process (Trade Name)
Dehydro-Tech Corporation. Applications
Analysis Report.
See 1207
SETTLEMENTS
Report to Congress: Settlements with Munic-
ipal Waste Generators and Transporters
Since 1991 under the Comprehensive Envi-
ronmental Response, Compensation, and Li-
ability Act of 1980.
See 0596
SU-76
-------
SUBJECT INDEX
SITE ENFORCEMENT TRACKING SYSTEM
SEWAGE SLUDGE
Report to Congress: Settlements with Munic-
ipal Waste Generators and Transporters
Since 1991 under the Comprehensive Envi-
ronmental Response, Compensation, and Li-
ability Act of 1980.
See 0596
SEWAGE TREATMENT
Air/Superfund National Technical Guidance
Study Series. Database of Emission Rate
Measurement Projects.
See 1379
Respirometrio Methods for Determination of
Biodegradability and Biodegradation Kinetics
for Hazardous Organic Pollutant Com-
pounds.
See 1427
SEWAGE TREATMENT PLANTS
CERCLA Site Discharges to POTWs: Guid-
ance Manual.
See 1576
SEWERS
Overview of Selected EPA (Environmental
Protection Agency) Regulations and Guid-
ance Affecting POTW (Publicly Owned
Treatment Works) Management
See 0432
SHORT TERM EXPOSURE
Air/Superfund National Technical Guidance
Study Series: Evaluation of Short-Term Air
Action Levels for Superfund Sites.
See 1386
SIGNS
Public Awareness Signs at Superfund Sites.
See 0481
SILICATE TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION
Applications Analysis Report: Silicate Tech-
nology Corporation's Solidification/Stabiliza-
tion Technology for Organic and Inorganic
Contaminants in Soils.
See 1550
SINGLE GEL ELECTROPHORESIS
Evaluation of Exposure Markers.
See 1246
SITE CHARACTERIZATION
Expectations for Full Implementation of
SACM.
See 0092
Integrating Removal and Remedial Site As-
sessment Investigations.
See 0939
International Symposium on Field Screening
Methods for Hazardous Wastes and Toxic
Chemicals (2nd), Proceedings. Held in Las
Vegas, Nevada on February 12-14,1991.
See 1279
Presumptive Remedies: Site Characterization
and Technology Selection for CERCLA Sites
with Volatile Organic Compounds in Soils.
See 1104
SITE DISCHARGES
CERCLA Site Discharges to POTWs: Guid-
ance Manual.
See 1576
SITE ENFORCEMENT TRACKING SYSTEM
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
Frequency by Party Name Report.
See 0607
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
Frequency by Party Name Report.
See 0608
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
Frequency by Party Name Report.
See 0609
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
Frequency by PRP Name Report, September
26, .1991.
See 0610
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
National Alphabetical Report by PRP Name,
September 26, 1991.
See 0612
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
National Frequency by PRP Name Report.
See 0614
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
National PRP Listing Alphabetically by PRP
Name.
See 0615
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
National PRP Listing by Site.
See 0617
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
National PRP Listing by Site.
See 0618
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
National PRP Report by Site, September 26,
1991.
See 0619
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)
(National - 3 1/2 Inch Diskette, IBM PS/2
Compatible) (for Microcomputers).
See 0620
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Alabama.
See 0621
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Alabama.
See 0622
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Alabama.
See 0623
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for American Samoa.
See 0624
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for American Samoa.
See 0625
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for American Samoa.
See 0626
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Arizona.
See 0627
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Arizona.
See 0628
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Arizona.
See 0629
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Arkansas.
See 0630
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Arkansas.
See 0631
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Arkansas.
See 0632
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for California.
See 0633
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for California.
See 0634
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for California.
See 0635
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Colorado.
See 0636
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Colorado.
See 0637
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Colorado.
See 0638
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Connecticut.
See 0639
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Connecticut.
See 0640
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Connecticut.
See 0641
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Delaware.
See 0642
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Delaware.
See 0643
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Delaware.
See 0644
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Florida.
See 0645
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Florida.
See 0646
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Florida.
See 0647
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Georgia.
See 0648
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Georgia.
See 0649
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Georgia.
See 0650
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Idaho.
See 0651
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Idaho.
See 0652
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Idaho.
See 0653
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Illinois.
See 0654
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Illinois.
See 0655
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Illinois.
See 0656
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Indiana.
See 0657
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Indiana.
See 0658
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Indiana.
See 0659
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Iowa.
See 0660
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Iowa.
See 0661
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Iowa.
See 0662
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Kansas.
See 0663
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Kansas.
See 0664
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Kansas.
See 0665
SU-77
-------
SITE ENFORCEMENT TRACKING SYSTEM
II i lli'l'lili"
Site Enforcement tracking System (SETS):
'PRP Listing by Site for Kentucky.
Sea 0666
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Kentucky.
SM0667
SKa Enforcement Tracking System CSETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Kentucky.
See 0668
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Louisiana.
Sea 0669
:Sjto Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PfiP 'Gsilng by Site'fbr Louisiana.
Sea 0670
SJta Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Louisiana.
Sea 0671
Site Enforoomont Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Maine.
Sea 0672
Sfta Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site" for Maine.
Sea 0673
;Sjta Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
"p'&P Listing by Site'for Maine.
Sea 0674
Stta Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
,PRP Listing by Site for Maryland.
Sea 0675
Sfta Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
£RP Lisjing by Site for Maryland.
Seo0676
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Maryland.
S4M0677
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
.PRP Listing by Site for Massachusetts.
§•00678
Stta Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Massachusetts.
Seo 0679
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Massachusetts.
See 0680
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Michigan.
Sea 0681
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Michigan.
Sea 0682
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Michigan.
Soa 0683
Sta Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Minnesota.
Sea 0684
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Minnesota.
See 0685
,Sjte Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Minnesota.
Sea 0686
Stta Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Mississippi.
Sea 0687
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Mississippi.
Sea 0688
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
ERR Listing by Site for Mississippi.
Sea 0689
Stta Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Usting by Site for Missouri.
See 0690
;Sjte EnforcementTracking System (SETS):
",PfiP" Listing by Site for Missouri.
8060691
Stta Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Usting by Site for Missouri.
8090692
sU-78 !: '!
SUBJECT INDEX
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Montana.
See 0693
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Montana.
See 0694
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Montana.
See 0695
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Nebraska.
See 0696
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Nebraska.
See 0697
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Nebraska.
See 0698
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Nevada.
See 0699
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Nevada.
See 0700
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Nevada.
See 0701
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for New Hampshire.
See 0702
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for New Hampshire.
See 0703
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for New Hampshire.
See 0704
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for New Jersey.
See 0705
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for New Jersey.
See 0706
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for New Jersey.
See 0707
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for New Mexico.
See 0708
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for New Mexico.
See 0709
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for New Mexico.
See 0710
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for New York.
See 0711
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for New York.
See 0712
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for New York.
See 0713
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for North Carolina.
See 0714
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for North Carolina.
See 0715
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for North Carolina.
See 0716
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Usting by Site for North Dakota.
See 0717
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Usting by Site for North Dakota.
See 0718
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for North Dakota.
See 0719
[ , •' . '' i
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Northern Marianas.
See 0720
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Northern Marianas.
See 0721
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Northern Marianas.
See 0722
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Usting by Site for Ohio.
See 0723
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Ohio.
See 0724
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Ohio.
See 0725
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Usting by Site for Oklahoma.
See 0726
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Usting by Site for Oklahoma.
See 0727
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Oklahoma.
See 0728
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Oregon.
See 0729
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Oregon.
See 0730
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Usting by Site for Oregon.
See 0731
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Pennsylvania.
See 0732
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Pennsylvania.
See 0733
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Usting by Site for Pennsylvania.
See 0734
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Puerto Rico.
See 0735
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Puerto Rico.
See 0736
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Usting by Site for Puerto Rico.
See 0737
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Usting by Site for Region 1.
See 0738
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Usting by Site for Region 1. Volume 1.
See 0742
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Usting by Site for Region 2.
See 0743
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 2. Volume 2.
See 0747
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 3.
See 0748
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Usting by Site for Region 3. Volume 3.
See 0751
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 4.
See 0752
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Usting by Site for Region 4. Volume 4.
See 0756
I iiii,!,,
. , ..
ii,,,,:!!.;;!:,!;! ii
riLJ .j liftliii!^ ii Ilii ftiiLu;:ili.i
-------
SUBJECT INDEX
SITE ENFORCEMENT TRACKING SYSTEM
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 5.
See 0757
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 5. Volume 5.
See 0761
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 6.
See 0762
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 6. Volume 6.
See 0766
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 7.
See 0767
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 7. Volume 7.
See 0771
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 8.
See 0772
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 8. Volume 8.
See 0776
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 9.
See 0777
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 9.
See 0778
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 9. Volume 9.
See 0781
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 10.
See 0782
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 10. Volume
10.
See 0786
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Rhode Island.
See 0787
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Rhode Island.
See 0788
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Rhode Island.
See 0789
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for South Carolina.
See 0790
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for South Carolina.
See 0791
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for South Carolina.
See 0792
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for South Dakota.
See 0793
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for South Dakota.
See 0794
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for South Dakota.
See 0795
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Tennessee.
See 0796
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Tennessee.
See 0797
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Tennessee.
See 0798
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Texas.
See 0799
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Texas.
See 0800
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Texas.
See 0801
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Trust Territories.
See 0802
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Trust Territories'.
See 0803
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Trust Territories.
See 0804
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Utah.
See 0805
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Utah.
See 0806
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Utah.
See 0807
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Vermont.
See 0808
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Vermont.
See 0809
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Vermont.
See 0810
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Virginia.
See 0811
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Virginia.
See 0812
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Washington.
See 0813
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Washington.
See 0814
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Washington.
See 0815
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for West Virginia.
See 0816
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for West Virginia.
See 0817
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for West Virginia.
See 0818
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Wisconsin.
See 0819
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Wisconsin.
See 0820
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Wisconsin.
See 0821
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Wyoming.
See 0822
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Wyoming.
See 0823
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Wyoming.
See 0824
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP National Frequency by Party Name,
January 22, 1992.
See 0825
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP National Listing Alphabetically by Party
Name.
See 0826
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP National Listing Alphabetically by Party
Name.
See 0827
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP National Listing Alphabetically by Party
Name.
See 0828
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP National Listing Alphabetically by Party
Name.
See 0829
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP National Listing by Site.
See 0832
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP National Listing by Site.
See 0833
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP National Listing by Site.
See 0834
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP National Listing by Site.
See 0835
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Report by Site for Region 2, September
26, 1991.
See 0839
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Report by Site for Region 3, September
26, 1991.
See 0840
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Report by Site for Region 4, September
26, 1991.
See 0841
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Report by Site for Region 5, September
26, 1991.
See 0842
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Report by Site for Region 6, September
26, 1991.
See 0843
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Report by Site for Region 7, September
26, 1991.
See 0844
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Report by Site for Region 9, September
26,1991.
See 0846
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Report by Site for Region 10, Septem-
ber 26, 1991.
See 0847
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Site Listing by Site for Virginia.
See 0848
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)
(Region 1 - 3 1/2 Inch Diskette IBM PS/2
Compatible) (for Microcomputers).
See 0849
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)
(Region 2-3 1/2 Inch Diskette IBM PS/2
Compatible) (for Microcomputers).
See 0851
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)
(Region 3-31/2 Inch Diskette IBM PS/2
Compatible) (for Microcomputers).
See 0853
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)
(Region 4-3 1/2 Inch Diskette IBM PS/2
Compatible) (for Microcomputers).
See 0855
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)
(Region 5-31/2 Inch Diskette IBM PS/2
Compatible) (for Microcomputers).
See 0857
SU-79
-------
SITE ENFORCWE(4T TICKING SYSTEM
SUBJECT INDEX
Stte Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)
i (Region 6-31/2 Inch Diskette IBM PS/2
• Compatible) (for Microcomputers).
;;, See, 0859
: Site Enforcement tracking System (SETS)
(Ragtort 7-31/2 Inch Diskette IBM PS/2
Compatible) (for Microcomputers).
See 0861
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)
(Regton 8-31/2 Inch Diskette IBM PS/2
Compatible) (for Microcomputers).
Sea 0863
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)
(Region 9-31/2 Inch Diskette IBM PS/2
Compatible) (for Microcomputers).
Sea 0865
'. Sit* Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)
£ {Region 10-3 1/2 Inch Diskette IBM PS/2
i: CoropatWa) (for Microcomputers).
;;See, 06,67
Srf| oiFOftCMEffT f RA^
I, 'Sits" Enforcement Tracking System" (SETS):
: PRP Report by Site for Region 1, September
26, 1991.
2880838
SITE PROGRAM
...... Quality Assurance for the SITE (Superfund
Innovative Technology Evaluation) Program
Demonstrations.
See 0992 ......................
11 Superfund Innovative Technology Evaluation
Program: Technology Profiles, November
1989.
I See 1317 .................................
Technology Evaluation Report: StTE Pro-
- gram Demonstration Test Horsehead Re-
source Development Company, Inc., Flame
Reactor Technology, Monaca, Pennsylvania.
See 1353
i Technology Evaluation Report SITE Program
Demonstration Test, HAZCON Solidification,
i Dooglassvflta, Pennsylvania. Volume 1.
See 1569
StTE SELECTION
Superfund Fact Sheet: Identifying Sites.
See 0491
SITE (SUPERFUND INNOVATIVE
............
=-SITE Program" Demonstration of the' SBP
I leohnotogies, Inc., Membrane Filtration
• System on Creosote-Contaminated Water.
See 1S92
Superfund Innovative Technology Evaluation
" Program: Annual Report to Congress 1992.
See 1309
I Superfund Innovative Technology Evaluation
....... Program: Technology Profiles, Sixth Edition.
.......... See 1318 ..................
SITE SURVEYS
: ..... Kdolikmal Guidance oh 'Worst Sites' and
:J!|II;?«H. Caliber Sites; to Assist in SACM Imple-
11 ..... rrwntaibrl
S000083
Assessing Sites under SACM: Interim Guid-
ance, Volume 1, Number 4, Deccember
;=:1992.
See 0084
Assessment of Tentatively Identified Com-
pounds in Superfund Samples.
See 1199
Development of Emerging Technologies
within the SITE Program.
See 1231 ...............................
Ecosystem Effects of Superfund. National
Priority List Sites in Industrial Landscapes: A
Framework for Policy Decisions.
Sea 0135
Environmental Compliance Branch, Standard
Operating Procedures and Quality Assurance
Manual, Revision 1.
866,0535
Guidance for Performing Site Inspections
under CERCLA.
See 0343
Guidance on Setting Priorities for NPL Can-
didate Sites.
See 0344
Guidance on Site Assessment Cooperative
Agreements.
See 0475
Importance of Quality for Collection of Envi-
ronmental Samples. Planning, Implementing,
and Assessing Field Sampling Quality at
CERCLA Sites.
See 0919
In-situ Stabilization/Solidification of PCB
(Polychlorinated BiphenylsJ-Contaminated
Soil.
See 1556
Management of Investigation-Derived
Wastes during Site Inspections.
See 0349
PA-Scpre (Preliminary Assessment Score),
Version 2.1, 31/2 inch (for Microcomput-
ers).
See 0369
PA-Score (Preliminary Assessment Score),
Version 2.1, 51/4 inch (for Microcomput-
ers).
See 0370
PREscore Software. Users Manual and Tuto-
rial. Version 1.0.
See 0374
Evaluation of Modifications to Extraction Pro-
cedures Used in Analysis of Environmental
Samples from Superfund Sites.
See 1247
Summary of GIS Support to Superfund.
See 1307
Superfund Emergency Response Actions: A
Summary of Federally Funded Removals.
Volume 3.
See 0318
Superfund Fact Sheet: Identifying Sites.
See 0491
Superfund Innovative Technology Evaluation
Program: Technology Profiles, November
1989.
See 1317
Supplemental Guide to Video on Superfund
Site Assessment Screening: A National Pri-
ority.
See 0394
Survey of Materials-Handling Technologies
Used at Hazardous Waste Sites.
See 1323
Terra Vac In situ Vacuum Extraction System:
Applications Analysis Report.
See 1355
Terra Vac In situ Vacuum Extraction System:
Applications Analysis Report.
See 1356
SITES
Accessing Federal Data Bases for Contami-
nated Site Clean-Up Technologies.
See 1188
Bibliography of Federal Reports and Publica-
tions Describing Alternative and Innovative
Treatment Technologies for Corrective
Action and Site Remediation.
See 1206
CERCLIS Characterization Project: National
Results.
See 0001
CERCLIS Characterization Project: Region 1
Results.
See 0002
CERCLIS Characterization Project: Region 2
Results.
See 0003
CERCLIS Characterization Project: Region 3
Results".
See 0004
CERCLIS Characterization Project: Region 4
Results.
See 0005
CERCLIS Characterization Project: Region 5
Results.
See 0006
CERCLIS Characterization Project: Region 6
Results.
See 0007
CERCLIS Characterization Project: Region 7
Results.
See 0008
CERCLIS Characterization Project: Region 8
Results.
See 0009
CERCLIS Characterization Project: Region 9
Results.
See 0010
CERCLIS Characterization Project: Region
10 Results.
See 0011
CERCLIS (Comprehensive Environmental
Response, Compensation, and Liability Infor-
mation System) Site Location Extract.
See 0012
Cleaning Up the Nation's Waste Sites: Mar-
kets and Technology Trends.
See 0132
ECO Update: Ecological Assessment of Su-
perfund Sites. An Overview. Volume 1,
Number 2, December 1991.
See 1019
ECO Update: The Role of BTAGs in Ecologi-
cal Assessment. Volume 1, Number 1, Sep-
tember 1991.
See 1020
Guidance for Performing Preliminary Assess-
ments under CERCLA.
See 0342
Guide to Community Involvement for Site
Assessment Managers.
See 0476
Policy for Superfund Compliance with the
RCRA Land Disposal Restrictions.
See 0436
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 1.
See 0740
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 2.
See 0745
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 3.
See 0749
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 4.
See 0754
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 5.
See 0759
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 6.
See 0764
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 7.
See 0769
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 8.
See 0774
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 9.
See 0779
SU-80
-------
SUBJECT INDEX
SOIL CHEMISTRY
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 10.
See 0784
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP National Listing Alphabetically by Party
Name.
See 0830
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP National Listing by Site.
See 0836
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Report by Site for Region 8, September
26, 1991.
See 0845
Superfund Accelerated Cleanup Model
(SACM).
See 0119
Technical Support Services for Superfund
Site Remediation. Second Edition.
See 1335
SLAGS
Horsehead Resource Development Compa-
ny, Inc., Flame Reactor Technology. Tech-
nology Demonstration Summary.
See 1264
EPA SITE Demonstration of the Horsehead
Resource Development Company Flame Re-
actor Technology.
See 1242
Superfund Innovative Technology Evaluation
(SITE): Demonstration Bulletin. Flame Reac-
tor, Horsehead Resource Development
Company, Inc.
See 1319
SLUDGE
Pilot-Scale Incineration of Contaminated
Sludges from the Bofors-Nobel Superfund
Site.
See 1289
SLUDGE TREATMENT
SITE Demonstration of the Basic Extractive
Sludge Treatment Process.
See 1300
Resources Conservation Company B.E.S.T.
(Trade Name) Solvent Extraction Technolo-
gy: Application Analysis Report.
See 1294
SLURRIES
Innovative Technology: Slurry-Phase Biode-
gradation.
See 1271
On-Site Engineering Report of the Slurry-
Phase Biological Reactor for Pilot-Scale
Testing on Contaminated Soil.
See 1520
Slurry Biodegradation.
See 1428
SLURRY BIO-REACTORS
Pilot-Scale Demonstration of a Slurry-Phase
Biological Reactor for Creosote-Contaminat-
ed Soil. Applications Analysis Report.
See 1426
EPA SITE Demonstration of the BioTrol Soil
Washing Process.
See 1502
SLURRY WALLS
Engineering Bulletin: Slurry Walls.
See 1235
SMALL BUSINESSES
Mentor-Protege Program.
See 0044
SMALL SYSTEMS
Small Systems Meet Superfund Challenge
with Point-of-Entry Treatment Units.
See 1304
SMELTERS
Draft Record of Decision for the Aluminum
Smelter Conservation/Modernization Pro-
gram.
See 1087
SOFTWARE
BEN Model: Calculates Violators' Economic
Benefits from Noncompliance (Version 4.0)
(for Microcomputers).
See 0514
CASHOUT Model: Calculates Current Value
of Superfund Cleanup Costs (Version 1.2)
(for Microcomputers).
See 1208
Environmental Monitoring Methods Index
(EMMI), Version 1.0 (5 - User LAN) (for
Microcomputers).
See 1238
Environmental Monitoring Methods Index
(EMMI), Version 1.0 (for Microcomputers).
See 1239
Environmental Monitoring Methods Index
(EMMI), Version 1.0 (Unlimited User LAN)
(for Microcomputers).
See 1240
Inorganic Contract Compliance Screening
, System (ICCSS) Software (for Microcomput-
ers).
See 0034
Inorganic Contract Compliance Screening
System (ICCSS) Software (ILM02.1 Version
2) (for Microcomputers).
See 0036
Inorganic Contract Compliance Screening
System (ICCSS) Software (ILM02.1 Version
3) (for Microcomputers).
See 0037
Inorganic Contract Compliance Screening
System (ICCSS) Software (ILM02.1 Version
4) (for Microcomputers).
See 0038
Inorganic Contract Compliance Screening
System (ICCSS) Software (ILM02.1 Version
5) (for Microcomputers).
See 0039
Inorganic Contract Compliance Screening
System (ICCSS) Software (SOW March
1990) (Version 1) (for Microcomputers).
See 0040
Organic Contract Compliance Screening
System (OCCSS) Software (for Microcom-
puters).
See 0047
Organic Contract Compliance Screening
System (OCCSS) Software (OLM01.8 Ver-
sion 2) (for Microcomputers).
See 0049
Organic Contract Compliance Screening
System (OCCSS) Software (OLM01.8 Ver-
sion 3) (for Microcomputers).
See 0050
Organic Contract Compliance Screening
System (OCCSS) Software (OLM01.8 Ver-
sion 4) (for Microcomputers).
See 0051
Organic Contract Compliance Screening
System (OCCSS) Software (OLM01.8 Ver-
sion 5) (for Microcomputers).
See 0052
Organic Contract Compliance Screening
System (OCCSS) Software (OLM01.8 Ver-
sion 6) (for Microcomputers).
See 0053
Organic Contract Compliance Screening
System (OCCSS) Software (SOW February
1988) (for Microcomputers).
See 0054
Organic Contract Compliance Screening
System (OCCSS) Software (SOW March
1990) (Version 1) (for Microcomputers).
See 0055
Organic Contract Compliance Screening
System (OCCSS) Software (SOW OLM01.8
Version January 1992) (Version 1) (for
Microcomputers).
See 0056
PA-Score (Preliminary Assessment Score),
Version 1.0 (for Microcomputers).
See 0368
PA-Score (Preliminary Assessment Score),
Version 2.1, 3 1/2 inch (for Microcomput-
. ers).
See 0369
PA-Score (Preliminary Assessment Score),
Version 2.1, 5 1/4 inch (for Microcomput-
ers).
See 0370
Preliminary Ranking Evaluation Score
(PREscore) Version 2.0 (for Microcomput-
ers).
See 0373
Site Assessment Information Directory
(SAID) Region 1 (for Microcomputers). Date
of Coverage: October 1991.
See 0382
Site Assessment Information Directory
(SAID) Region 2 (for Microcomputers). Date
of Coverage: October 1991.
See 0383
Site Assessment Information Directory
(SAID) Region 3 (for Microcomputers). Date
of Coverage: October 1991.
See 0384
Site Assessment Information Directory
(SAID) Region 4 (for Microcomputers). Date
of Coverage: October 1991.
See 0385
Site Assessment Information Directory
(SAID) Region 5 (for Microcomputers). Date
of Coverage: 1991.
See 0386
Site Assessment Information Directory
(SAID) Region 6 (for Microcomputers). Date
of Coverage: October 1991.
See 0387
Site Assessment Information Directory
(SAID) Region 7 (for Microcomputers). Date
of Coverage: October 1991.
See 0388
Site Assessment Information Directory
(SAID) Region 8 (for Microcomputers). Date
of Coverage: 1991.
See 0389
Site Assessment Information Directory
(SAID) Region 9 (for Microcomputers). Date
of Coverage: October 1991.
See 0390
Site Assessment Information Directory
(SAID) Region 10 (for Microcomputers). Date
of Coverage: October 1991.
See 0391
SOIL
Citizen's Guide to Soil Washing.
See 0458
SOIL ANALYSIS
Aseptic Sampling of Unconsolidated Heaving
Soils in Saturated Zones.
See 1489
SOIL CHARACTERIZATION
Characterizing soils for hazardous waste site
assessments.
See 1495
SOIL CHEMISTRY
In situ Bioremediation of Contaminated Un-
saturated Subsurface Soils.
See 1509
SU-81
-------
SOIL CLASSIFICATION
SUBJECT INDEX
SQIL CLASSIFICATION
Ground-Water Issue: Characterizing Soils for
Hazardous Waste Site Assessments.
Sea 1455
S
-------
SUBJECT INDEX
SOLIDIFICATION
SOIL VACUUM EXTRACTION
EPA Site Demonstration of the Terra Vac In
situ Vacuum Extraction Process in Grove-
land, Massachusetts. (Site Program Update-
Part VII).
See 1243
SOIL VAPOR EXTRACTION
Air/Superfund National Technical Guidance
Study Series: Estimation of Air Impacts for
Soil Vapor Extraction (SVE) Systems
See 1383
Guide for Conducting Treatability Studies
under CERCLA: Soil Vapor Extraction. Quick
Reference Fact Sheet.
See 1164
In situ Soil Vapor Extraction Treatment
See 1511
Technology Evaluation Report: Site Program
Demonstration Test. Accutech Pneumatic
Fracturing Extraction and Hot Gas Injection
Phase 1. Volume 1.
See 1352
SOIL VENTING
Citizen's Guide to Bioventing.
See 0453
Evaluation of Soil Venting Application.
Ground Water Issue.
See 1505
SOIL WASHING
BioGenesis (Trade Name) Soil Washing
Technology: Innovative Technology Evalua-
tion Report.
See 1490
BioTrol Soil Washing System for Treatment
of a Wood Preserving Site: Applications
Analysis Report.
See 1492
Guide for Conducting Treatability Studies
under CERCLA: Soil Washing, interim Guid-
ance.
See 1165
Guide for Conducting Treatability Studies
under CERCLA: Soil Washing: Quick Refer-
ence Fact Sheet.
See 1166
Will Soil Working Work for the Sand Creek
Superfund Site.
See 1548
Soil Washing Treatment.
See 1532
Technology Evaluation Report: Biotrol Soil
Washing System for Treatment of a Wood
Preserving Site. Volume 1.
See 1539
Technology Evaluation Report: Biotrol Soil
Washing System for Treatment of a Wood
Preserving Site. Volume 2, Part A.
See 1540
Technology Evaluation Report Biotrol Soil
Washing System for Treatment of a Wood
Preserving Site. Volume 2, Part B.
See 1541
Toronto Harbour Commissioners (THC) Soil
Recycle Treatment Train. Applications Analy-
sis Report.
See 1544
SOILS
Air/Superfund National Technical Guidance
Study Series. Development of Example Pro-
cedures for Evaluating the Air Impacts of
Soil Excavation Associated with Superfund
Remedial Actions.
See 1380
Citizen's Guide to Thermal Desorption.
See 0460
Compendium of ERT Soil Sampling and Sur-
face Geophysics Procedures.
See 0904
Determining Soil Response Action Levels
Based on Potential Contaminant Migration to
Ground Water: A Compendium of Examples.
See 1497
Development of Electro-Acoustic Soil De-
contamination (ESD) Process for In situ Ap-
plications.
See 1498
Ground-Water Issue: Soil sampling and anal-
ysis for volatile organic compounds.
See 1507
Guide for Conducting Treatability Studies
under CERCLA: Soil Vapor Extraction. Inter-
im Guidance.
See 1163
Innovative Treatment Technologies: Semi-
Annual Status Report (Fourth Edition).
See 1273
On-Site Engineering Report of the Slurry-
Phase Biological Reactor for Pilot-Scale
Testing on Contaminated Soil.
See 1520
Operations and Research at the U.S. EPA
Incineration Research Facility: Annual
Report for FY89.
See 1482
Pilot-Scale Incineration of Contaminated Soil
from the Purity Oil Sales and McColl Super-
fund Sites.
See 1290
Presentations EPA-State Soil Standards
Conference. Held in Crystal City, Virginia on
January 29, 1991.
See 1524
Rationale for the Assessment of Errors in
the Sampling of Soils.
See 1526
Removal Program Representative Sampling
Guidance. Volume 1. Soil.
See 1010
Control Technologies for Remediation of
Contaminated Soil and Waste Deposits at
Superfund Lead Battery Recycling Sites.
See 1221
EPA SITE Demonstration of the BioTrol Soil
Washing Process.
See 1502
Summary of Treatment Technology Effec-
tiveness for Contaminated Soil.
See 1533
Technology Evaluation Report: Pilot-Scale
Demonstration of a Slurry-Phase Biological
Reactor for Creosote-Contaminated Soil.
Volume 1.
See 1542
Technology Evaluation Report: Site Program
Demonstration of a Trial Excavation at the
McColl Superfund Site.
See 1349
Vendor Information System for Innovative
Treatment Technologies (VISITT). Number 1.
See 1370
SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL
Notification of Hazardous Substance Sites
(Section 103(c)).
See 1147
Solidification/Stabilization of Organics and
Inorganics.
See 1561
Superfund Guide to RCRA Management Re-
quirements for Mineral Processing Wastes
See 0439
Technical Support Services for Superfund
Site Remediation. Second Edition.
See 1335
Technology Evaluation Report: International
Waste Technologies/Geo-Con In situ Stabili-
zation/Solidification. Volume 4. Update
Report.
See 1568
SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT
NACEPT Committee Recommendations to
Administrator Browner.
See 0142
NACEPT Materials for Meeting Held on Sep-
tember 20-21, 1993.
See 0143
Organic Contract Compliance Screening
System (OCCSS) Software (OLM01.8 Ver-
sion 4) (for Microcomputers).
See 0051
SOLIDIFICATION
Applications Analysis Report: Silicate Tech-
nology Corporation's Solidification/Stabiliza-
tion Technology for Organic and Inorganic
Contaminants in Soils.
See 1550
Chemfix Technologies, Inc. Solidification/
Stabilization Process. Application Analysis
Report.
See 1551
Estimation of Air Impacts for Solidification
and Stabilization Processes Used at Super-
fund Sites. Air/Superfund National Technical
Guidance Study Series.
See 1408
Immobilization Technology Seminar: Speaker
Slide Copies and Supporting Information.
See 1555
In-situ Stabilization/Solidification of PCB
(Polychlorinated Biphenyls)-Contaminated
Soil.
See 1556
Description of EPA SITE Demonstration of
the HAZCON Stabilization Process at the
Douglassville, Pennsylvania Superfund Site.
See 1552
EPA SITE Demonstration of the International
Waste Technologies/Geo-Con In situ Stabili-
zation/Solidification Process.
See 1553
Evaluation of Waste Stabilized by the Solidi-
tech SITE Technology.
See 1554
SITE Demonstration of the CHEMFIX Solidi-
fication/Stabilization Process at the Portable
Equipment Salvage Company Site.
See 1559
Solidification/Stabilization: Is It Always Ap-
propriate.
See 1560
Sorption, Important in Stabilized/Solidified
Waste Forms.
See 1563
Solidification/Stabilization of Organics and
Inorganics.
See 1561
Soliditech, Inc. Solidification/Stabilization
Process: Applications Analysis Report.
See 1562
Technology Evaluation Report CHEMFIX
Technologies, Inc., Solidification/Stabiliza-
tion Process, Clackamas, Oregon. Volume 2.
See 1339
Technology Evaluation Report: Chemfix
Technologies, Inc. Solidification/Stabilization
Process, Clackamas, Oregon. Volume 1.
See 1566
Technology Evaluation Report SITE Program
Demonstration Test, HAZCON Solidification,
Douglassville, Pennsylvania. Volume 1.
See 1569
Technology Evaluation Report: SITE Pro-
gram Demonstration Test, Soliditech, Inc.,
Solidification/Stabilization Process. Volume
1.
See 1570
SU-83
-------
SOLIDITECH PROCESS
i Technology Evaluation Report: SITE Pro-
gram Demonstration Test, Soliditech, Inc.
Solidification/Stabilization Process. Volume
""'2'. "
Sea 1571
SOilblfECH PROCESS
Solklltach. Inc. Solidification/Stabilization
Process: Applications Analysis Report
See 1562
Technology Evaluation Report: SITE Pro-
gram Demonstration Test, Soliditech, Inc.,
Solidification/Stabilization Process. Volume
! 1, '
See 1570
• Technology Evaluation Report: SITE Pro-
gram Demonstration Test, Soliditech, Inc.
Solidification/Stabilization Process. Volume
2.
See 1571
SOJ.VENT EXTRACTION
" :=::'''CarW-Grefl'nfield Process' (Trade Name)
behydro-tech Corporation. Applications
Analysts Report.
See 1207
, Innovative Technology: BEST Solvent Ex-
'.' (faction Process.
See 1270
Evaluation of Modifications to Extraction Pro-
cedures Used in Analysis of Environmental
Samples from Superfund Sites.
See 1247
SITE Demonstration of the CF Systems Or-
gantes Extraction System.
See 1301
Solvent Extraction Processes: A Survey of
Systems In the StTE Program.
See 1305
Resources Conservation Company B.E.S.T.
(Trade Name)' Solvent Extraction Technolo-
gy: Application Analysis Report.
See 1294
Solvent Extraction Treatment
See 1306
Technology Evaluation Report SITE Pro-
gram. CF Systems Organics Extraction
System, New Bedford, Massachusetts.
Volume 1.
See 1346
-'Technology Evaluation Report SITE Pro-
gram. CF Systems Organics Extraction
System, New Bedford, Massachusetts.
Volume 2.
See 1347
I,.'technology Evaluation" Report. SITE Pro-
gram Demonstration, Resources Conserva-
tion Company, Basic Extractive Sludge
Treatment (B.E.S.T. (Trade Name)), Grand
Calumet River, Gary, Indiana. Volume 1.
See 1593
Technology Evaluation Report. SITE Pro-
gram Demonstration, Resources Conserva-
tton Company, Baste Extractive Sludge
Treatment (B.E.S.T. (Trade Name)), Grand
Calumet River, Gary, Indiana. Volume 2. Part
See 1594
-Technology Evaluation Report SITE Pro-
.., gram Demonstration, Resources Conserva-
i tton Company, Baste Extractive Sludge
Treatment (g.E-S.T. (Trade Name)), Grant
Calumet River, Gary, Indiana. Volume 2. Part
2.
See 1595
Technology Evaluation Report. SITE Pro-
gram Demonstration, Resources Conserva-
tion Company, Basic Extractive Sludge
Treatment (B.E.S.T. CTrade Name)), Grand
'"' Calumet River, Gary, Indiana. Volume 2. Part
3.
See 1596
SUBJECT INDEX
SOLVENTS
Citizen's Guide to Solvent Extraction.
See 0459
SORPTION
Basic Concepts of Contaminant Sorption at
Hazardous Waste Sites (Ground Water
Issue).
See 1431
Sorption, Important in Stabilized/Solidified
Waste Forms.
See 1563
SOUTH CAIRO (NEW YORK)
Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Clean-
up Efforts Nationwide, Fall 1992. (American
Thermostat Corporation, New York).
See 0942
SOUTH CAROLINA
National Priorities List Sites: South Carolina.
See 0266
National Priorities List Sites: South Carolina.
See 0267
National Priorities List Sites: South Carolina,
1992.
See 0268
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for South Carolina.
See 0790
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for South Carolina.
See 0791
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for South Carolina.
See 0792
SOUTH DAKOTA
National Priorities List Sites: North and
South Dakota.
See 0241
National Priorities List Sites: North and
South Dakota, 1992.
See 0242
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for South Dakota.
See 0793
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for South Dakota.
See 0794
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for South Dakota.
See 0795
SPOKANE (WASHINGTON STATE)
Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Clean-
up Efforts Nationwide, Summer 1993 (North-
side Landfill Site Profile, Spokane, Washing-
ton).
See 0968
STABILIZATION
Applications Analysis Report: Silicate Tech-
nology Corporation's Solidification/Stabiliza-
tion Technology for Organic and Inorganic
Contaminants in Soils.
See 1550
Chemfix Technologies, Inc. Solidification/
Stabilization Process. Application Analysis
Report.
See 1551
Estimation of Air Impacts for Solidification
and Stabilization Processes Used at Super-
fund Sites. Air/Superfund National Technical
Guidance Study Series.
See 1408
Immobilization Technology Seminar: Speaker
Slide Copies and Supporting Information.
See 1555
In-situ Stabilization/Solidification of PCB
(Polychlorinated BiphenylsJ-Contaminated
Soil.
See 1556
Description of EPA SITE Demonstration of'
the HAZCON Stabilization Process at the
Douglassville, Pennsylvania Superfund Site.
See 1552
EPA SITE Demonstration of the International
Waste Technologies/Geo-Con In situ Stabili-
zation/Solidification Process.
See 1553
Results from the Stabilization Technologies
Evaluated by the Site Program. New Eng-
land Environmental Expo 90.
See 1558
SITE Demonstration of the CHEMFIX Solidi-
fication/Stabilization Process at the Portable
Equipment Salvage Company Site.
See 1559
Solidification/Stabilization: Is It Always Ap-
propriate.
See 1560
Sorption, Important in Stabilized/Solidified
Waste Forms.
See 1563
Solidification/Stabilization of Organics and
Inorganics.
See 1561
Superfund Innovative Technology Evaluation
Technology Demonstration Summary: Chem-
fix Solidification/Stabilization Process, Clack-
amas, Oregon.
See 1564
Technology Evaluation Report: SITE Pro-
gram Demonstration Test, Soliditech, Inc.,
Solidification/Stabilization Process. Volume
1.
See 1570
Technology Evaluation Report: SITE Pro-
gram Demonstration Test, Soliditech, Inc.
Solidification/Stabilization Process. Volume
2.
See 1571
STABILIZED/SOLIDIFIED WASTE
Sorption, Important in Stabilized/Solidified
Waste Forms.
See 1563
STANDARD METROPOLITAN STATISTICAL
AREAS
Estimating VOC Emissions from Superfund
Sites in the Houston-Galveston Texas Area.
(NNEMS Project No. 1302).
See 1406
STANDARDS
Methods for Evaluating the Attainment of
Cleanup Standards. Volume 2. Ground
Water.
See 1469
STANDARDS COMPLIANCE
BEN: A Model to Calculate the Economic
Benefit of Noncompliance. User's Manual.
See 0513
STATE GOVERNMENT
Involvement of Superfund Program Manag-
ers in Superfund Response Agreement
Audits.
See 0099
Obligation of Funds under Superfund State
Contracts.
See 0478
Status of State Involvement in the Superfund
Program, FY 80 to FY 89.
See 0114
STATE PROGRAMS
Analysis of State Superfund Programs: 50-
State Study, 1990 Update.
See 0448
Analysis of State Superfund Programs: 50-
State Study. 1991 Update.
See 0449
SU-84
-------
SUBJECT INDEX
SUPERFUND
Enhancing State Superfund Capabilities-
Nine-State Study.
See 0471
Guidance on Site Assessment Cooperative
Agreements.
See 0475
STATES (UNITED STATES)
Analysis of State Superfund Programs- 50-
State Study.
See 0447
CERCLA (Comprehensive Environmental Re-
sponse, Compensation and Liability Act)
Compliance with Other Laws Manual: Part 2.
Clean Air Act and Other Environmental Stat-
utes and State Requirements.
See 0413
Cleaning Up the Nation's Waste Sites: Mar-
kets and Technology Trends
See 0132
STATUTES
CERCLA (Comprehensive Environmental
Response, Compensation and Liability Act)
Compliance with Other Laws Manual: Part 2.
Clean Air Act and Other Environmental Stat-
utes and State Requirements
See 0413
STRATEGIC PLANNING
Superfund Strategic Plan and Implementa-
tion Strategy Fiscal Year 1994.
See 0126
Superfund Strategic Plan and Implementa-
tion Strategy Rscal Year 1994: Office and
Division Plans.
See 0127
STRIPPERS
Air/Superfund National Technical Guidance
Study Series. Air Stripper Design Manual
See 1374
Air/Superfund National Technical Guidance
Study Series. Comparisons of Air Stripper
Simulations and Field Performance Data
See 1376
Control of Air Emissions from Superfund Air
Strippers at Superfund Groundwater Sites.
See 1399
Tech Trends (Number 8).
See 1328
STRIPPING
Toxic Treatments 'In-situ' Steam/Hot-Air
Stripping Technology. Applications Analysis
Report.
See 1545
STRUCTURED TRAINING AND EVALUATION
PROGRAM
CERCLA Implementation of Inspector Train-
ing Requirements for OSCs/RPMs at the In-
termediate Level in STEP and First-Line Su-
pervisors.
See 0517
STYRENE
Health Effects Assessment for Styrene
See 1046
SUBCONTRACTS
Contracting and Subcontracting Guide to the
Superfund Program.
See 0023
SUBJECT INDEX TERMS
Hazardous Waste Superfund Collection: Da-
tabase Thesaurus.
See 0138
SUBSURFACE INVESTIGATIONS
Aseptic Sampling of Unconsolidated Heaving
Soils in Saturated Zones.
See 1489
SUMMA CANISTERS
Compendium of ERT Air Sampling Proce-
dures.
See 0901
SUPERFUND
Abstract Proceedings: Superfund Technical
Support Project General Meeting. Held in
Athens, Georgia on December 3-6, 1990
See 1187
Abstracts of Phase 1 and Phase 2 Awards:
Small Business Innovation Research Pro-
gram 1991.
See 0016
Accelerated Response at NPL Sites Guid-
ance (Superfund Management Review: Rec-
ommendation No. 22). L
See 0082
Accelerating Potentially Responsible Party
Remedial Design Starts: Implementing the
30-Day Study.
See 0509
Accessing Federal Data Bases for Contami-
nated Site Clean-Up Technologies.
See 1188
Accessing the $50 Million Set-Aside in the
Remedial Action Budget for Quick Response
at National Priorities List Sites.
See 1082
Additional Guidance on 'Worst Sites' and
'NPL Caliber Sites' to Assist in SACM Imple-
mentation.
See 0083
Administrative Guidance for the FIT to ARCS
(FIT/ARCS) Transition.
See 0017
Administrative Order on Consent for Reme-
dial Investigations/Feasibility Study.
See 0510
Administrative Penalty Procedures.
See 0511
Advancing the Use of Treatment Technol-
ogies for Superfund Remedies.
See 1191
Air/Superfund National Technical Guidance
Study Series. Air Stripper Design Manual.
See 1374
Air/Superfund National Technical Guidance
Study Series: Applicability of Open Path
Monitors for Superfund.
See 1375
Air/Superfund National Technical Guidance
Study Series: Compilation of Information on
Real-Time Air Monitoring for Use at Super-
fund Sites.
See 1377
Air/Superfund National Technical Guidance
Study Series. Contingency Plans at Super-
fund Sites Using Air Monitoring.
See 1378
Air/Superfund National Technical Guidance
Study Series. Database of Emission Rate
Measurement Projects.
See 1379
Air/Superfund National Technical Guidance
Study Series. Emission Factors for Super-
fund Remediation Technologies.
See 1381
Air/Superfund National Technical Guidance
Study Series: Estimation of Air Impacts for
Air Stripping of Contaminated Water.
See 1382
Air/Superfund National Technical Guidance
Study Series: Estimation of Air Impacts for
Soil Vapor Extraction (SVE) Systems
See 1383
Air Superfund National Technical Guidance
Study Series. Estimation of Air Impacts for
the Excavation of Contaminated Soil.
See 1384
Air/Superfund National Technical Guidance
Study Series: Estimation of Air Impacts from
Area Sources of Particulate Matter Emis-
sions at Superfund Sites.
See 1385
Air/Superfund National Technical Guidance
Study Series: Evaluation of Short-Term Air
Action Levels for Superfund Sites.
See 1386
Air/Superfund National Technical Guidance
Study Series. Guideline for Predictive Base-
line Emissions Estimation Procedures for Su-
perfund Sites.
See 1387
Air/Superfund National Technical Guidance
Study Series. Models for Estimating Air
Emission Rates from Superfund Remedial
Actions.
See 1388
Air Superfund National Technical Guidance
Study Series. Screening Procedures for Esti-
mating the Air Impacts of Incineration at Su-
perfund Sites.
See 1389
Air/Superfund National Technical Guidance
Study Series. Volume 1. Overview of Air
Pathway Assessments for Superfund Sites
(Revised).
See 1391
Air/Superfund National Technical Guidance
Study Series. Volume 4. Guidance for Ambi-
ent Air Monitoring at Superfund Sites (Re-
vised).
See 1393
Alternative Biological Treatment Processes
for Remediation of Creosote-and PCP-Con-
taminated Materials: Bench-Scale Treatabil-
ity Studies.
See 1418
Amendment to Historical Definitions of NPL
Deletion Start and Completion Dates.
See 0335
Analysis of State Superfund Programs: 50-
State Study.
See 0447
Analysis of State Superfund Programs: 50-
State Study, 1990 Update.
See 0448
Analysis of State Superfund Programs: 50-
State Study. 1991 Update.
See 0449
Analysis of Treatability Data for Soil and
Debris: Evaluation of Land Ban Impact on
Use of Superfund Treatment Technologies.
See 1488
Applicability of Land Disposal Restrictions to
RCRA and CERCLA Ground Water Treat-
ment Reinjection Superfund Management
Review: Recommendation No. 26.
See 1430
Application of a Water Quality Assessment
Modeling System at a Superfund Site.
See 1573
Applications Analysis Report: SITE Program,
• CF Systems Organics Extraction System,
New Bedford, Massachusetts.
See 1196
Approval of Long Term Contracting Strategy
for Superfund (Superfund Management
Review: Recommendation E.2).
See 0018
ARAR's Q's and A's. Compliance with the
Toxicity Characteristics Rule. Part 1.
See 0396
ARARs Fact Sheet: Compliance with the
Clean Air Act and Associated Air Quality Re-
quirements.
See 0397
ARARs Q's and A's.
See 0398
. ARARS Q's and A's: Compliance with Fed-
eral Water Quality Criteria.
See 0399
SU-85
-------
SOPERFUND
SUBJECT INDEX
ARARs Q's and A's Compliance with New
!! SOWA National Primary Drinking Water Reg-
I lilailons for Organic and Inorganic Chemi-
! cal*. '
See 0400
ARARs Q's and A's: General Policy, RCRA,
CWA, SDWA, Post-ROb Information, and
Contingent Waivers.
See 0401
ARARs Q's and A's: State Ground-Water
Anlfdogradatlon Issues.
Sea 0402
ARARs Q's and A's: The Fund-Balancing
Waiver. lll"l=" "
SM 0403
|M Arbitration Proceduresfor Small Superfund
Cost'Recovery CTaims'^
See 0512
ARCS Construction Contract Modification
Procedures,
See 0020
ARCS Work Assignment Management: Field
Guide.
See 0021
Assessing Potential Indoor Air Impacts for
I Suporfund Sites. Air/Superfund National
technical Guidance Study Series.
S««1395
-,'. AssossJng Reports of Continuous Releases
"•' of Hazardous Substances: A Guide for EPA
"'•' Regions.
'SM.114.2
I" Assessing Sites under SACM: Interim Guid-
ance. Volume 1, Number 4, Deocember
1902.
See 0084
Assessment o( Tentatively Identified Com-
pounds in Superfund Samples.
Sea 1199
Assurance of Hazardous Waste Capacity,
Guidance to State Officials. Assistance in
Fulfilling the Requirements of CERCLA
104(o)(9).
See 0129
ATSDR Health Consultations under
CERCLA.
S«e1018
Audit Management Process. Reference
Guide.
See 0085
Audits and the Superfund Program Manager.
See 0086
Audits and the Superfund Program Manager.
See 0087
Authority to Use CERCLA to Provide En-
forcement Funding Assistance to States.
See 0450
Authorization for Regional Administrators to
Approve Consistency Exemptions at NPL
Sites.
S000998
AWD Technologies Integrated AquaDetox
(Trade Name)/SVE Technology: Applications
Analysis Report.
Sao 1202
Basic Concepts of Contaminant Sorption at
Hazardous Waste Sites (Ground Water
Issue).
Sea 1431
BEN: A Model to Calculate the Economic
Benefits of Nonoompliance. User's Manual
(Revised).
Sea 1205
Bfotilohesis (Trade Name) Soil Washing
Technology: Innovative Technology Evalua-
tion Report.
See 1490
Btotogteal Assessment of Toxicity Caused by
Chemical Constituents Eluted from Site Soils
Collected at the Drake Chemical Superfund
Site, Lock Haven, Clinton Co., Pennsylvania.
See 1491
Bioremediation Resource Guide and Biore-
mediation Resource Matrix.
See 1425
CASHOUT Model: Calculates Current Value
of Superfund Cleanup Costs (Version 1.2)
(for Microcomputers).
See 1208
CASHOUT User's Manual for Superfund.
See 0515
CERCLA Community Relations Mailing Lists.
See 0451
CERCLA Compliance with Other Environ-
mental Statutes.
See 0404
CERCLA Compliance with Other Laws
Manual: CERCLA Compliance with State Re-
quirements.
See 0405
CERCLA Compliance with Other Laws
Manual: CERCLA Compliance with the CWA
and SDWA.
See 0406
CERCLA Compliance with Other Laws
Manual: Guide to Manual.
See 0407
CERCLA Compliance with Other Laws
Manual: Overview of ARARs - Focus on
ARAR Waivers.
See 0408
CERCLA Compliance with Other Laws
Manual: RCRA ARARS-Focus on Closure
Requirements.
See 0410
CERCLA Compliance with Other Laws
Manual: Summary and Part 2. CAA, TSCA,
and Other Statutes.
See 0411
CERCLA Compliance with the RCRA Toxici-
ty Characteristics (TC) Rule: Part 2.
See 0412
CERCLA Enforcement Policy Compendium
Update.
See 0516
CERCLA Implementation of Inspector Train-
ing Requirements for OSCs/RPMs at the In-
termediate Level in STEP and First-Line Su-
pervisors.
See 0517
CERCLA Implementation of the Training Re-
quirements of EPA Order 3500.1. Inspector
Training.
See 0518
CERCLA Notifications: Emergency Re-
sponse Notification System (ERNS) Fact
Sheet.
See 0926
CERCLA Off-Site Policy - Eligibility of Facili-
ties in Assessment Monitoring.
See 0414
CERCLA Off-Site Policy: Providing Notice to
Facilities.
See 0415
CERCLA Removal Actions at Methane Re-
lease Sites.
See 0416
CERCLA Site Discharges to POTWS
CERCLA Site Sampling Program: Detailed
Data Report.
See 1575
CERCLA Site Discharges to POTWS Treat-
ability Manual.
See 1577
CERCLA/Superfund Orientation Manual.
See 0130
CERCLA Waste Capacity Assurance.
See 0131
CERCLIS Characterization Project: National
Results.
See 0001
CERCLIS Characterization Project: Region 1
Results.
See 0002
CERCLIS Characterization Project: Region 2
Results.
See 0003
CERCLIS Characterization Project: Region 3
Results.
See 0004
CERCLIS Characterization Project: Region 4
Results.
See 0005
CERCLIS Characterization Project: Region 5
Results.
See 0006
CERCLIS Characterization Project: Region 6
Results.
See 0007
CERCLIS Characterization Project: Region 7
Results.
See 0008
CERCLIS Characterization Project: Region 8
Results.
See 0009
CERCLIS Characterization Project: Region 9
Results.
See 0010
CERCLIS Characterization Project: Region
10 Results.
See 0011
CERCLIS Data Handling Support Policy
Statement.
See 0013
CERCLIS Listing.
See 0014
CERCLIS - WasteLAN - CleanLAN.
See 0015
Characterization Protocol for Radioactive
Contaminated Soils.
See 1494
Chemfix Technologies, Inc. Solidification/
Stabilization Process. Application Analysis
Report.
See 1551
Chemical Dehalogenation Treatability Stud-
ies under CERCLA: An Overview.
See 1153
Chemical Dehalogenation Treatability Stud-
ies under CERCLA: An Overview.
See 1209
Chemical Enhancements to Pump-and-Treat
Remediation. Ground Water Issue.
See 1434
Chemical Oxidation Treatment. Engineering
Bulletin.
See 1211
Chemical Waste Management, Inc.
PO*WW*ER (Trade Name) Evaporation-
Catalytic Oxidation Technology. Technology
Evaluation Report. Volume 1.
See 1213
Chemical Waste Management, Inc.
PO*WW*ER (Trade Name) Evaporation-
Catalytic Oxidation Technology. Technology
Evalution Report. Volume 2.
See 1214
Citizen's Guide to Air Sparging.
See 0452
Citizen's Guide to Bioventing.
See 0453
Citizen's Guide to In situ Soil Flushing.
See 0456
Citizen's Guide to Innovative Treatment
Technologies for Contaminated Soils,
Sludges, Sediments and Debris.
See 0457
Citizen's Guide to Using Indigenous and Ex-
ogenous Microorganisms in Bioremediation.
See 0461
Citizens' Guidance Manual for the Technical
Assistance Grant Program.
See 0462
SU-86
,
iKiBIII ,i ,j. ,.<; .. ' ..... ..Jili. ;.,.;. ,. . : si1,.,., •; ( ' , . ......
.1111,^^ ...... ill ....... iil ..... jj ......... .jijij ........... iliiliilir fcii ...... mi ....... tlMiliiii....!.!!;.
... jit i,. ...... i ., .ilid ii< (. ii ...... jil. -I,;;.; ,:» i,,,, •('.'
..... iiliiiitii ...... ;.:, ..... .illM^^^ ..... lUiiiiiHlnili, .....
-------
SUBJECT INDEX
SUPERFUND
Citizens' Guidance Manual for the Technical
Assistance Grant Program
See 0463
Clarification of Delegation to Approve Con-
sistency Exemptions at NPL Sites
See 0336
Cleanup Information Bulletin Board System
Users Guide. (CLU-IN: Cleanup Information
Bulletin Board).
See 1215
Closing the NPL Book under the Oriqinal
HRS.
See 0337
Commencement Bay Nearshore/Tideflats
Feasibility Study. Development of Sediment
Cleanup Goals.
See 1578
Commencement Bay Nearshore/Tideflats
Feasibility Study. Executive Summary
See 1579
Commencement Bay Nearshore/Tideflats
Feasibility Study. Volume 1
See 1580
Commencement Bay Nearshore/Tideflats
Feasibility Study. Volume 2. Appendices
See 1581
Community Relations during Enforcement
Activities and Development of the Adminis-
trative Record.
See 0466
Community Relations in Superfund: A Hand-
book.
See 0467
Community Relations: Use of Senior Envi-
ronmental Employees in Superfund (Super-
fund Management Review: Recommendation
43.K.L).
See 0088
Comparative Analysis of Remedies Selected
in the Superfund Program during FY 87 FY
88 and FY 89.
See 0519
Compendium of ERT Air Sampling Proce-
dures.
See 0901
Compendium of ERT Field Analytical Proce-
dures.
See 0902
Compendium of ERT Groundwater Sampling
Procedures.
See 0903
Compendium of ERT Soil Sampling and Sur-
face Geophysics Procedures.
See 0904
Compendium of ERT Surface Water and
Sediment Sampling Procedures
See 0905
Compendium of ERT Toxicity Testing Proce-
dures.
See 0906
Compendium of ERT Waste Sampling Pro-
cedures.
See 0907
Compendium of Federal Facilities Directives
1984 and 1985.
See 0896
Compendium of Good Ideas: Models of Suc-
cess and Lessons Learned. Volume 1 Hiah-
lights.
See 0133
Compendium of Good Ideas: Models of Suc-
cess and Lessons Learned. Volume 2
Source Book.
See 0134
Compendium of NPL Listing Policies and
Procedures, 1982 to 1985
See 0338
Compendium of ROD Language for FY 1993
Focus Areas.
See 1083
Compliance with Third Third Requirements
Under the LDRs. Superfund LDR Guide No.
8.
See 0418
Conducting Non-Time-Critical Removal Ac-
tions under CERCLA.
See 0999
Conducting Remedial Investigations/Feasi-
bility Studies for CERCLA Municipal Landfill
Sites.
See 1084
Congressional Limits for FY 92 Alternative
Remedial Contracting Strategy (ARCS) Pro-
gram Management Costs.
See 0022
Consent Orders and the Reimbursement
Provision Under Section 106(b) of CERCLA.
See 0520
Consideration of ARARs during Removal Ac-
tions.
See 0419
Consideration of RCRA Requirements in
Performing CERCLA Responses at Mining
Waste Sites.
See 0420
Considerations in Ground Water Remedi-
ation at Superfund Sites.
See 1436
Considerations in Ground-Water Remedi-
ation at Superfund Sites and RCRA Facili-
ties: Update.
See 1437
Consultation on Records of Decision
(RODS) for Containment-Only Remedies.
See 0521
Continuous Release-Emergency Response
Notification System and Priority Assessment
Model: Model Documentation
See 1143
Continuous Release-Emergency Response
Notification System and Priority Assessment
Model: User's Manual for EPA Regions
See 1144
Continuous Release - Emergency Response
Notification System. User's Manual for In-
dustry.
See 1145
Contracting and Subcontracting Guide to the
Superfund Program.
See 0023
Control of Air Emissions from Superfund Air
Strippers at Superfund Groundwater Sites.
See 1399
Control of Air Emissions from Superfund
Sites.
See 1400
Control Technologies for Defunct lead Bat-
tery Recycling Sites: Overview and Recent
Developments. Volume 3.
See 1220
Coordination of EPA and State Actions in
Cost Recovery.
See 0522
Cost of Remedial Action Model
See 1085
Cost of Remedial Actions (CORA) Model:
Overview and Applications.
See 1086
Cost Recovery Actions/Statute of Limita-
tions.
See 0523
Cost Recovery Actions under CERCLA.
See 0524
Cost Recovery Referrals.
See 0525
Counting State-Lead Enforcement NPL Sites
Toward the CERCLA Section 116(e) Reme-
dial Action Start Mandate.
See 0468
Criminal Investigations and the Superfund
Program.
See 0469
Criteria for Choosing Indicator Species for
Ecological Risk Assessments at Superfund
Sites (90-6402).
See 1224
CWM PO*WW*ER (Trade Name) Evapora-
tion-Catalytic Oxidation Technology: Applica-
tions Analysis Report.
See 1225
Data Quality Objectives Decision Error Fea-
sibility Trials (DEFT) Beta Version 1.01.
User's Guide.
See 0979
Data Quality Objectives for Remedial Re-
sponse Activities: Development Process. Ex-
ample Scenario: RI/FS Activities at a Site
with Contaminated Soils and Ground Water.
See 0980
Data Quality Objectives Process for Super-
fund.
See 0981
Data Quality Objectives Process for Super-
fund.
See 0982
Data Quality Objectives Process for Super-
fund: Interim Final Guidance.
See 0983
Data Quality Objectives Process for Super-
fund: Workbook.
See 0984
Debarment and Suspension.
See 0470
Decentralization of Superfund Bottle Reposi-
tory Functions.
See 0985
Demonstration of a Trial Excavation at the
McColl Superfund Site.
See 1226
Design Considerations for Ambient Air Moni-
toring at Superfund Sites. Engineering Bulle-
tin.
See 1402
Determination of Imminent and Substantial
Endangerment for Removal Actions.
See 1000
Determining Soil Response Action Levels
Based on Potential Contaminant Migration to
Ground Water: A Compendium of Examples.
See 1497
Development of Emerging Technologies
within the SITE Program.
See 1231
Developments in Chemical Treatment of
Contaminated Soil.
See 1499
Discharge of Wastewater from CERCLA
Sites into POTWS.
See 0421
Distribution of DRAFT Soil Screening Level
Guidance.
See 1500
DuPont/Oberlin Microfiltration Technology.
Applications Analysis Report.
See 1584
Early Action and Long-Term Action under
SACM: Interim Guidance, Volume 1, Number
2, December 1992.
See 0089
ECO Update: Ecological Assessment of Su-
perfund Sites. An Overview. Volume 1,
Number 2, December 1991.
See 1019
ECO Update: The Role of BTAGs in Ecologi-
cal Assessment. Volume 1, Number 1, Sep-
tember 1991.
See 1020
ECO Update. Volume 1, Number 3. The
Role of Natural Resource Trustees in the
Superfund Process.
See 1021
SU-87
-------
SUPERFUND
ECO Update. Volume 1, Number 4. Develop-
ing a Work Soop« for Ecological Assess-
monts.
"S«*1022
Ecosystem Effects of Superfund. National
Priority List-Sites In Industrial Landscapes: A
Framework for Policy Decisions.
See 0135
Effect of OSHA's Bloodborne Pathogens
Standard on Hazardous Waste Cleanup Ac-
tivities.
Sea 1026
Emefgancy Rospondera Agreements for
"fJjod-Lsad Remedial Actions.
i;§fa'WJ ',1 'II I" " .
Emergency Response Notification System.
Seo 0927
Emerging technologies: Bio-Recovery Sys-
tems Removal and Recovery of Metal Ions
' from Grouodwater.
Soe 1439
Emerging Technologies: Bio-Recovery Sys-
""1«ms Romoval and Recovery of Metal Ions
from Grourtdwater. Appendices.
Soa1440
Errwging Technology Report Metals Treat-
Storjlat Suporfund Sites by Absorptive Filtra-
JSto,".: ,':, :":: :::: :
See 1232
Endangefment Assessment Guidance.
Sea 0527
!" Endangerment Assessment Guidance.
Soa0528
Endangwmont Assessment Handbook.
Soa 0529
a Endartgerment Assessment Handbook.
SMI 0530
Enforcement Project Management Hand-
,.890533
Enforcement under SACM: Interim Guid-
ance, Volume 1, Number 3, December 1992.
Sea 0090
Engineering Bulletin: Air Pathway Analysis.
Sea 1404
Engineering Bulletin: Pyrolysis Treatment.
Sea 1234
..... Engineering Bulletin: Slurry Walls.
Soa 1235
Engineering Bulletin: Technology Preselec-
tion Data Requirements.
Sco 1405
Enhancing State Superfund Capabilities:
Nine-State Study.
Sea 0471
Ensuring the Adequacy of Cost Share Provi-
sions In Superfund State Contracts.
"" ...... See 0472 .........................................
Entry and Continued Access under CERCLA.
Sea 0534
Environmental Asbestos Assessment
Manual. Superfund Method for the Determi-
nation of Asbestos In Ambient Air. Part 1.
'' ..... ..... .......... '"
,,, . ,
It Sea 1027
Environmental Asbestos Assessment
Manual. Superfund Method for the Determi-
nation of Asbestos in Ambient Air. Part 2.
Technical Background Document
Soe 1028
Environmental Characteristics of EPA, NRC,
and DOS Sites Contaminated with Radioac-
tive Substances,
See 1237
,"„ EPA Interim Guidance on Indemnification of
:::! Superfund Response Action Contractors
Under Section 1 1 9 of SARA.
Sea 0536
EPA/Navy CERCLA Remedial Action Tech-
nology Guide,
Soa 1241
SUBJECT INDEX
EPA Oversight of Remedial Designs and Re-
medial Actions Performed by PRPs.
See 1124
EPA/U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Payment
Process, Direct Cite/Revised Reimburse-
ment Methods.
See 1125
EPA/USACE Payment Process: Direct Cite/
Revised Reimbursement Methods.
See 1126
Establishing Work Zones at Uncontrolled
Hazardous Waste Sites.
See 0908
Estimating Potential for Occurrence of
DNAPL at Superfund Sites.
See 1442
Estimating VOC Emissions from Superfund
Sites in the Houston-Galveston Texas Area.
(NNEMS Project No. 1302).
See 1406
Estimation of Air Impacts for Bioventing Sys-
tems Used at Superfund Sites. Air/Super-
fund National Technical Guidance Study
Series.
See 1407
Estimation of Air Impacts for Solidification
and Stabilization Processes Used at Super-
fund Sites. Air/Superfund National Technical
Guidance Study Series.
See 1408
Estimation of Air Impacts for Thermal De-
sorption Units Used at Superfund Sites. Air/
Superfund National Technical Guidance
Study Series.
See 1409
Evaluating Mixed Funding Settlements under
CERCLA.
See 0537
Evaluation of Alternative Treatment Technol-
ogies for CERCLA Soils and Debris (Summa-
ry of Phase 1 and Phase 2).
See 1504
Evaluation of, and Additional Guidance on,
Issuance of Unilateral Administrative Orders
(UAOs) for RD/RA.
See 0538
Evaluation of Cleanup Levels for Remedial
Action at CERCLA (Comprehensive Environ-
mental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) Sites Based on a Review of EPA
(Environmental Protection Agency) Records
of Decision.
See 1245
Evaluation of Commercially-Available Porta-
ble Gas Chromatographs.
See 1478
Evaluation of Ground-Water Extraction Rem-
edies. Volume 2. Case Studies 1-19.
See 1446
Evaluation of Ground-Water Extraction Rem-
edies. Volume 3. General Site Data: Data
Base Reports.
See 1447
Evaluation of Soil Venting Application.
Ground Water issue.
See 1505
Evaluation of Terrestrial Indicators for Use in
Ecological Assessments at Hazardous
Waste Sites.
See 1249
Evaluation of the Likelihood of DNAPL Pres-
ence at NPL Sites: National Results.
See 1448
Evaluation of Unsaturated/Valdose Zone
Models for Superfund Sites.
See 1449
Exemptions from the Statutory Limits on Re-
moval Actions.
See 1002
Exercising Flexibility through the Superfund
Accelerated Cleanup Model (SACM).
See 0091
Expanded Civil Judicial Referral Procedures.
See 0539
Expansion of Direct Referral of Cases to the
Department of Justice.
See 0540
Expectations for Full Implementation of
SACM.
See 0092
Expedited Response Actions.
See 1003
Expediting Remedial Construction.
See 1127
Extending the Tracking of Analytical Serv-
ices to Potentially Responsible Party-Lead
Superfund Sites (Supplemental Guidance on
OSWER Directive 9240.0-2A).
See 0986
Facilitated Transport. Series of Issue Papers
(3rd).
See 1451
FACT BOOK: National Priorities List under
the Original Hazard Ranking System, 1981-
1991.
See 0340
Feasibility Study: Detailed Analysis of Reme-
dial Action Alternatives.
See 1088
Feasibility Study: Development and Screen-
ing of Remedial Action Alternatives.
See 1089
Field Certification Tracking System (FCTS).
User's Guide. Version 2.1.
See 0909
Field Standard Operating Procedures for Air
Surveillance F.S.O.P. No. 8.
See 0910
Field Standard Operating Procedures for Es-
tablishing Work Zones (F.S.O.P. 6).
See 0911
Field Standard Operating Procedures for
Preparation of a Site Safety Plan F.S.O.P.
No. 9.
See 0912
Field Standard Operating Procedures for the
Decontamination of Response Personnel
F.S.O.P. No. 7.
See 0913
Final EPA Policy on the Inclusion of Environ-
mental Auditing Provisions in Enforcement
Settlements.
See 0541
Final Guidance on Administrative Records
for Selecting CERCLA Response Actions.
See 0473
Final Guidance on Implementation of the
'Consistency1 Exemption to the Statutory
Limits on Removal Actions.
See 1004
Final Guidance on Preparing Waste-In Lists
and Volumetric Rankings for Release to Po-
tentially Responsible Parties (PRPs) under
CERCLA ('Waste-In' Guidance).
See 0542
Final Policy on Setting RI/FS Priorities.
See 1090
Forurn Focus, August 1993.
See 0136
Forum on Innovative Hazardous Waste
Treatment Technologies: Domestic and
International. Held in Atlanta, Georgia on
June 19-21,1989. Abstract Proceedings.
See 1252
Funding of State Enforcement Related Ac-
tivities.
See 0474
Further Direction on Implementing the Su-
perfund Accelerated Cleanup Model (SACM).
See 0093
SU-88
-------
SUBJECT INDEX
SUPERFUND
Furthering the Use of Innovative Treatment
Technologies in OSWER Programs
See 1255
Furthering the Use of Innovative Treatment
Technologies in OSWER Programs
See 1256
FY 1992 Themes for Regional Coordination
to Support Continuous Improvements of Su-
perfund's Remedial Program
See 1091
Getting Ready: Scoping the RI/FS.
See 1092
Ground-Water Issue: Characterizing Soils for
Hazardous Waste Site Assessments
See 1455
Ground-Water Issue: Potential Sources of
Error in Ground-Water Sampling at Hazard-
ous Waste Sites.
See 1456
Ground-Water Issue: The Effects of Well
Casing Material on Ground Water-Qualitv
See 1457
Ground Water Sampling for Metals Analyses
Superfund Ground Water Issue
See 1459
Guidance for Capacity Assurance Planning.
Capacity Planning Pursuant to CERCLA Sec-
tion 104(c)(9).
See 0137
Guidance for Coordinating ATSDR Health
Assessment Activities with the Superfund
Remedial Process.
See 1029
Guidance for Data Useability in Risk Assess-
ment.
See 1030
Guidance for Data Useability in Risk Assess-
ment.
See 1031
Guidance for Data Useability in Risk Assess-
ment. Interim Report.
See 1032
Guidance for Data Useability in Risk Assess-
ment (Part A).
See 1033
Guidance for Environmental Priorities Initia-
tive (EPI) Facilities in the Superfund Pre-Re-
medial Program.
See 0341
Guidance for Federal Facilities on Release
Notification Requirements under CERCLA
and SARA Title III.
See 0898
Guidance for Organizing ARCS Contract
Files.
See 0025
Guidance for Performing Preliminary Assess-
ments under CERCLA.
See 0342
Guidance for Performing Site Inspections
under CERCLA.
See 0343
Guidance of the Use of Stipulated Penalties
in Hazardous Waste Consent Decrees
See 0544
Guidance on Applicability of EPA Order
3500.1 to CERCLA Staff.
See 0545
Guidance on Applying the Data Quality Ob-
jectives Process for Ambient Air Monitoring
Around Superfund Sites (Stage 3)
See 0987
Guidance on Applying the Data Quality Ob-
jectives Process for Ambient Air Monitoring
Around Superfund Sites (Stages 1 and 2)
See 0988
Guidance on CERCLA Section 106 Judicial
Actions.
See 0546
Guidance on CERCLA Settlements with De
Micromis Waste Contributors
See 0547
Guidance on CERCLA 106(a) Unilateral Ad-
ministrative Orders for Remedial Designs
and Remedial Actions.
See 0548
Guidance on Conducting Non-Time-Critical
Removal Actions under CERCLA.
See 1005
Guidance on Documenting Decisions Not to
Take Cost Recovery Actions
See 0549
Guidance on Drafting Consent Decrees in
Hazardous Waste Cases
See 0550
Guidance on EPA Oversight of Remedial De-
signs and Remedial Actions Performed by
Potentially Responsible Parties
See 1128
Guidance on Expediting Remedial Design
and Remedial Action.
See 1129
Guidance on Federal Superfund Liens
See 0551
Guidance on Implementation of the 'Contrib-
ute to Remedial Performance' Provision
See 1093
Guidance on Implementation of the Super-
fund Accelerated Cleanup Model (SACM)
under CERCLA and the NCP.
See 0094
Guidance on Landowner Liability under Sec-
tion 107(a)(1) of CERCLA, De Minimis Set-
tlements under Section 122(g)(1)(B) of
CERCLA, and Settlements with Prospective
Purchasers of Contaminated Property.
See 0552
Guidance on Oversight of Potentially Re-
sponsible Party Remedial Investigations and
Feasibility Studies. Volume 1
See 1094
Guidance on Oversight of Potentially Re-
sponsible Parry Remedial Investigations and
Feasibility Studies. Volume 2. Appendices
See 1095
Guidance on Oversight of PRP Performed
RD/RA.
See 1130
Guidance on Premium Payments in CERCLA
Settlements.
See 0553
Guidance on Preparing Waste-in Lists and
Volumetric Rankings for Release to Poten-
tially Responsible Parties (PRPs) under
CERCLA.
See 0554
Guidance on Procedures for Submitting
CERCLA Section 106(b) Reimbursement Pe-
titions and on EPA Review of Those Peti-
tions.
See 0555
Guidance on Program Management Activi-
ties under ARCS.
See 0026
Guidance on Remedial Actions for Super-
fund Sites with PCB Contamination.
See 1260
Guidance on Remedial Actions for Super-
fund Sites with PCB Contamination
See 1261
Guidance on Setting Priorities for NPL Can-
didate Sites.
See 0344
Guidance on Site Assessment Cooperative
Agreements.
See 0475
Guidance Regarding CERCLA Enforcement
against Bankrupt Parties.
See 0556
Guide for Conducting Treatability Studies
under CERCLA.
See 1154
Guide for Conducting Treatability Studies
under CERCLA.
See 1155
Guide for Conducting Treatability Studies
under CERCLA: Aerobic Biodegradation
Remedy Screening.
See 1156
Guide for Conducting Treatability Studies
under CERCLA: Aerobic Biodegradation
Remedy Screening. Interim Guidance.
See 1157
Guide for Conducting Treatability Studies
under CERCLA: Aerobic Biodegradation
Remedy Screening. Quick Reference Fact
Sheet.
See 1158
Guide for Conducting Treatability Studies
under CERCLA: Biodegradation Remedy Se-
lection. Interim Guidance.
See 1159
Guide for Conducting Treatability Studies
under CERCLA: Biodegradation Remedy Se-
lection. Quick Reference Fact Sheet.
See 1160
Guide for Conducting Treatability Studies
under CERCLA: Chemical Dehalogenation.
See 1161
Guide for Conducting Treatability Studies
under CERCLA: Chemical Dehalogenation.
Final Report.
See 1162
Guide for Conducting Treatability Studies
under CERCLA: Soil Vapor Extraction. Quick
Reference Fact Sheet.
See 1164
Guide for Conducting Treatability Studies
under CERCLA: Soil Washing. Interim Guid-
ance.
See 1165
Guide for Conducting Treatability Studies
under CERCLA: Soil Washing: Quick Refer-
ence Fact Sheet.
See 1166
Guide for Conducting Treatability Studies
under CERCLA Solvent Extraction. Interim
Guidance.
See 1167
Guide for Conducting Treatability Studies
under CERCLA: Solvent Extraction Quick
Reference Fact Sheet.
See 1168
Guide for Conducting Treatability Studies
under CERCLA: Thermal Desorption Quick
Reference Fact Sheet.
See 1169
Guide for Conducting Treatability Studies
under CERCLA: Thermal Desorption
Remedy Selection. Interim Guidance.
See 1170
Guide: Methods for Evaluating the Attain-
ment of Cleanup Standards for Soils and
Solid Media.
See 1508
Guide on Remedial Actions at Superfund
Sites with PCB Contamination.
See 1262
Guide on Remedial Actions for Contaminat-
ed Ground Water.
See 1461
Guide to Addressing Pre-ROD and Post-
ROD Changes.
See 1096
Guide to Delisting of RCRA Wastes for Su-
perfund Remedial Responses.
See 0422
Guide to Developing Action Memorandums.
See 1097
SU-89
-------
SUPERFUND
SUBJECT INDEX
Guide to Developing Superfund No Action,
Interim Action, and Contingency Remedy
PODS.
feoa 1098
, QukJa to Developing Superfund Proposed
: Plans,
Sea 1099
I Guide to Discharging CERCLA Aqueous
Wastes to Publicly Owned Treatment Works
(POTWs).
Soa 0423
Qulda to Management of Investigation-De-
rived Wastes.
:::;"S««634"S ...............
Guide to Obtaining No Migration Variances
for CERCLA Remedial Actions.
........... Se«0424 .............................
Gukte to Pump and Treat Groundwater Re-
!": mediation Technology.
• ..... :: ...................
Guide to Removal Enforcement.
!:!: See 1006' ...............................
Gukte to Selecting Superfund Remedial Ac-
;;;; Boris.
Sea 1100
Guidelines for Effective Management of the
Contract Laboratory Program.
Sw 0027
Hazard Ranking System Guidance Manual.
S«e 0346
Hazard Ranking System Guidance Manual.
See 0347
.......... Hazardous Waste Operations and Emergen-
cy Response: Uncontrolled Hazardous
Waste Sites and RCRA Corrective Actions.
Soa 0425
Hazardous Waste Operations and Emergen-
cy Response: RCRA TSD and Emergency
Response Without Regard to Location.
See 091 4
Headquarters Support Contract Management
Procedures.
See 0029
i ; Health and Safety Plan (HASP) User's Guide
O/ersiori 3.0/4.0).
S««0917
Health and Safety Roles and Responsibilities
at Remedial Sites.
See 0918
I!' Highlights: Superfund Program Management.
Fiscal Year 1993.
See 0095
Homeowners Exempted from Superfund
Cleanup Costs: National Policy Overview.
See 0426
Hydraulte Fracturing Technology: Technolo-
gy Evaluation Report and Application Analy-
sts Report,
Sea 1265
Identification and Compilation of Unsaturat-
ed/Vadose Zone Models.
'Se«146'4
Identification of a Senior Superfund Official
*''•: for Addressing Special NPL Site-Related
Issues.
See 0348
Implementation of the Alternative Remedial
Contracting Strategy (ARCS) Task Force
Recommendations: Transmittal of the Imple-
mentation Plan.
Soo 0030
Implementation of the Decentralized Con-
tractor Performance Evaluation and Award
Fee Process for Selected Remedial Program
Contracts.
See 0031
:; , Implementation of the Superfund Alternative
Remedial Contracting Strategy (ARCS):
Report of the Administrator's Task Force.
: Implementation Plan.
See 0032
Implementing the Deputy Administrator's
Risk Characterization Memorandum.
See 1056
Importance of Quality for Collection of Envi-
ronmental Samples. Planning, Implementing,
and Assessing Field Sampling Quality at
CERCLA Sites.
See 0919
In situ Bioremediation of Contaminated Un-
saturated Subsurface Soils.
See 1509
Initiation of PRP-Financed Remedial Design
in Advance pf Consent Decree Entry (Final).
See 0557
Initiatives to Streamline the Alternative Re-
medial Contracting Strategy (ARCS) Con-
tracts' Award Fee Process.
See 0033
Innovative Methods to Increase Public In-
volvement in Superfund Community Rela-
tions (Superfund Management Review Rec-
ommendation No. 43.A).
See 0097
Innovative Technology: BEST Solvent Ex-
traction Process.
See 1270
innovative Technology: Glycolate Dehalo-
genation.
See 1513
Innovative Technology: In-situ Vitrification.
See 1514
Innovative Technology: Slurry-Phase Biode-
gradation.
See 1271
Innovative Technology: Soil Washing.
See 1515
Innovative Treatment Technologies: Over-
view and Guide to Information Sources.
See 1272
Innovative Treatment Technologies: Semi-
Annual Status Report (Fourth Edition).
See 1273
Innovative Treatment Technologies: Semi-
Annual Status Report, January 1991. First
Issue.
See 1274
Innovative Treatment Technologies: Semi-
Annual Status Report. (Third Edition).
See 1275
Inorganic Contract Compliance Screening
System (ICCSS) Software (ILM02.1 Version
4) (for Microcomputers).
See 0038
Inorganic Contract Compliance Screening
System (ICCSS) Software (ILM02.1 Version
5) (for Microcomputers).
See 0039
Integrated Timeline for Superfund Site Man-
agement (SMR 5,15).
See 0098
Integrating Removal and Remedial Site As-
sessment Investigations.
See 0939
Interim Cashout Settlement Procedures.
See 0558
Interim CERCLA Settlement Policy.
See 0559
Interim Final Guidance Package on Funding
CERCLA State Enforcement Actions at NPL
Sites.
See 0477
Interim Guidance for Soil Ingestion Rates.
See 1057
Interim Guidance on Establishing Soil Lead
Cleanup Levels at Superfund Sites. Supple-
ment to Interim Guidance on Establishing
Soil Lead Cleanup Levels at Superfund
Sites.
See 1516
Interim Guidance on Potentially Responsible
Party Participation in Remedial Investigations
and Feasibility Studies.
See 0561
Interim Guidance on Settlements with De
Minimis Waste Contributors under Section
122(g)ofSARA.
See 0562
Interim Guidance: Streamlining the CERCLA
Settlement Decision Process.
See 0563
Interim Guidelines for Preparing Nonbinding
Preliminary Allocations of Responsibility.
See 0564
Interim Model CERCLA Section 122(g) (4)
De Minimis Waste Contributor Consent
Decree and Administrative Order on Con-
sent.
See 0565
Interim Policy on Mixed Funding Settlements
Involving the Preauthorization of States or
Political Subdivisions.
See 0566
Interim RCRA/CERCLA Guidance on Non-
Contiguous Sites and On-Site Management
on Waste and Treatment Residue.
See 0427
International Waste Technologies/Geo-Con
In situ Stabilization/Solidification: Applica-
tions Analysis Report.
See 1557
Inventory of Treatability Study Vendors.
Volume 1.
See 1171
Involvement of Superfund Program Manag-
ers in Superfund Response Agreement
Audits.
See 0099
Issuance of Administrative Orders for Imme-
diate Removal Actions.
See 0567
Issuance of Administrative Orders Under
Section 3013 of the Resource Conservation
and Recovery Act.
See 0568
Issuance of Final Revised Guidance on the
Use and Issuance of Administrative Orders
Under Section 7003 of the Resource Con-
servation and Recovery Act (RCRA).
See 0569
Issues Paper on Radiation Site Cleanup
Regulations.
See 1280
Land Disposal Restrictions as Relevant and
Appropriate Requirements for CERCLA Con-
taminated Soil and Debris.
See 0428
Liability of Corporate Shareholders and Suc-
cessor Corporations for Abandoned Sites
Under the Comprehensive Environmental
Response, Compensation and Liability Act.
See 0570
Limited-Use Chemical Protective Clothing for
EPA Superfund Activities.
See 1058
Limiting Lead Transfers to Private Parties
during Discrete Phases of the Remedial
Process.
See 0571
Long-Term Contracting Strategy for Super-
fund.
See 0042
Long-Term Contracting Strategy for Super-
fund - Implementation.
See 0043
SU-90
-------
SUBJECT INDEX
SUPERFUND
Making Superfund Documents Available to
the Public throughout the Cleanup Process,
and Discussing Site Findings and Decisions
as They are Developed (Superfund Manage-
ment Review: No. 43 G, H, Q, R, T).
See 0100
Management of Investigation-Derived
Wastes during Site Inspections.
See 0349
Mandatory Community Relations Training.
Superfund Management Review Implementa-
tion Product (Recommendation: No. 43.P(i)).
See 0103
Mandatory Training Requirements for OCSs
and RPMs.
See 0104
Measurement of Volatile Organic Com-
pounds during Start-Up of Bioremediation of
French Limited Superfund Site in Crosby
Texas Using Wind Dependent Whole-Air
Sampling.
See 1414
Membrane Treatment of Wood Preserving
Site Groundwater by SBP Technologies, Inc.
Applications Analysis Report.
See 1468
Methodologies for Implementation of
CERCLA Section 122(g) (1) (A) De Minimis
Waste Contributor Settlements Proposals
and Agreements.
See 0572
Methodology for Early De Minimis Waste
Contributor Settlements under CERCLA Sec-
tion 122(g) (1) (A).
See 0573
Methodology for Evaluating Potential Car-
cinogenicity in Support of Reportable Quanti-
ty Adjustments Pursuant to CERCLA Section
102.
See 1146
Minimizing Problems Caused by Staff Turn-
over (Superfund Management Review: Rec-
ommendation No. 43, M, N, O).
See 0105
Model Administrative Order on Consent for
Removal Actions.
See 0574
Model Informational Notice Letter to Local
Governments.
See 0575
Model Litigation Report for CERCLA Sec-
tions 106 and 107 and RCRA Section 7003.
See 0576
Model Performance Standards for Superfund
Project Officers, Deputy Project Officers, and
Work Assignment Managers/Delivery Order
Officers.
See 0045
Model Statement of Work for a Remedial
Investigation and Feasibility Study Conduct-
ed by Potentially Responsible Parties.
See 0578
Model Unilateral Administrative Order for Re-
moval Response Activities.
See 0579
Model Unilateral Order for Remedial Design
and Remedial Action.
See 0580
Multi-Media Settlements of Enforcement
Claims.
See 0581
Multi-Media Settlements of Enforcement
Claims.
See 0582
Municipal Settlements.
See 0583
NACEPT Committee Recommendations to
Administrator Browner.
See 0142
NACEPT Materials for Meeting Held on Sep-
tember 20-21, 1993.
See 0143
NACEPT Meeting. Held in Crystal City, Vir-
ginia on February 11, 1994.
See 0144
National Oil and Hazardous Substances Pol-
lution Contingency Plan (The NCP).
See 0146
National Priorities List Book Set.
See 0147
National Priorities List Sites: Alabama.
See 0148
National Priorities List Sites: Alabama.
See 0149
National Priorities List Sites: Alabama, 1992.
See 0150
National Priorities List Sites: Alaska.
See 0151
National Priorities List Sites: Alaska.
See 0152
National Priorities List Sites: Alaska, 1992.
See 0153
National Priorities List Sites: American
Samoa, Guam, and the Trust Territories.
See 0154
National Priorities List Sites: American
Samoa, Guam and Trust Territories.
See 0155
National Priorities List Sites: Arizona and
Nevada.
See 0156
National Priorities List Sites: Arizona and
Nevada.
See 0157
National Priorities List Sites: Arizona and
Nevada, 1992.
See 0158
National Priorities List Sites: Arkansas.
See 0159
National Priorities List Sites: Arkansas.
See 0160
National Priorities List Sites: Arkansas, 1992.
See 0161
National Priorities List Sites: California.
See 0162
National Priorities List Sites: California and
Hawaii.
See 0163
National Priorities List Sites: California and
Hawaii, 1992.
See 0164
National Priorities List Sites: Colorado.
See 0165
National Priorities List Sites: Colorado.
See 0166
National Priorities List Sites: Colorado, 1992.
See 0167
National Priorities List Sites: Connecticut.
See 0168
National Priorities List Sites: Connecticut.
See 0169
National Priorities List Sites: Connecticut,
1992.
See 0170
National Priorities List Sites: Delaware.
See 0171
National Priorities List Sites: Delaware.
See 0172
National Priorities List Sites: Delaware, 1992.
See 0173
National Priorities List Sites: Florida.
See 0174
National Priorities List Sites: Florida.
See 0175
National Priorities List Sites: Florida, 1992.
See 0176
National Priorities List Sites: Georgia.
See 0177
National Priorities List Sites: Georgia.
See 0178
National Priorities List Sites: Georgia, 1992.
See 0179
National Priorities List Sites: Hawaii.
See 0180
National Priorities List Sites: Idaho.
See 0181
National Priorities List Sites: Idaho.
See 0182
National Priorities List Sites: Idaho, 1992.
See 0183
National Priorities List Sites: Illinois.
See 0184
National Priorities List Sites: Illinois.
See 0185
National Priorities List Sites: Illinois, 1992.
See 0186
National Priorities List Sites: Indiana.
See 0187
National Priorities List Sites: Indiana.
See 0188
National Priorities List Sites: Indiana, 1992.
See 0189
National Priorities List Sites: Iowa.
See 0190
National Priorities List Sites: Iowa.
See 0191
National Priorities List Sites: Iowa, 1992.
See 0192
National Priorities List Sites: Kansas.
See 0193
National Priorities List Sites: Kansas.
See 0194
National Priorities List Sites: Kansas, 1992.
See 0195
National Priorities List Sites: Kentucky.
See 0196
National Priorities List Sites: Kentucky.
See 0197
National Priorities List Sites: Kentucky, 1992.
See 0198
National Priorities List Sites: Louisiana.
See 0199
National Priorities List Sites: Louisiana.
See 0200
National Priorities List Sites: Louisiana, 1992.
See 0201
National Priorities List Sites: Maine.
See 0202
National Priorities List Sites: Maine.
See 0203
National Priorities List Sites: Maine, 1992.
See 0204
National Priorities List Sites: Maryland.
See 0205
National Priorities List Sites: Maryland.
See 0206
National Priorities List Sites: Maryland, 1992.
See 0207
National Priorities List Sites: Massachusetts.
See 0208
National Priorities List Sites: Massachusetts.
See 0209
National Priorities List Sites: Massachusetts,
1992.
See 0210
National Priorities List Sites: Michigan.
See 0211
National Priorities List Sites: Michigan.
See 0212
National Priorities List Sites: Michigan, 1992.
See 0213
National Priorities List Sites: Minnesota.
See 0214
National Priorities List Sites: Minnesota.
See 0215
National Priorities List Sites: Minnesota,
1992.
See 0216
National Priorities List Sites: Mississippi.
See 0217
SU-91
-------
SUPERFUND
SUBJECT INDEX
TfJatlonal Priorities list Sites: Mississippi.
§000218 ;.." 'I
National Priorities List Sites: Mississippi,
J,?92,
Soo 0219
National Priorities Ust Sites: Missouri.
Sea 0220
National Priorities Ust Sites: Missouri.
See 0221
National Priorities Ust Sites: Missouri, 1992.
Soo 0222
;;; National Priorities List Sites: Montana.
See 0223
-'"National'Pfiontfes'Dsigiies: Montana.
Sw 0224
Nafionaf Priorities "list Sites: Montana, 1992.
See 0225
i National Priorities Ust Sites: Nebraska.
Soe0226
NatJoriai Priorities Ust Sites: Nebraska.
See 0227
I'tilaSofiaf ' Priorities List" Sites: Nebraska,
1992.
See 0228
National Priorities Ust Sites: New Hamp-
shire.
See 0229
lii"National Priorities List Sites: New Hamp-
,, shiro.
See 0230
National Priorities Ust Sites: New Hamp-
shire, 1992.
See 0231
National Priorities Ust Sites: New Jersey.
See 0232
National Priorities Ust Sites: New Jersey.
See 0233
National Priorities List Sites: New Jersey,
1992.
Sea 0234
National Priorities Ust Sites: New Mexico.
See 0235
-National Priorities Ust Sites: New Mexico.
Sea 0236
National Priorities Ust Sites: New Mexico,
1992.
See 0237
National Priorities Ust Sites: New York.
See 0238
National Priorities Ust Sites: New York.
See 0239
"National Priorities List Sites: New York,
1992.
See 0240
National Priorities List Sites: North and
South Dakota.
See 0241
"" National Priorities List Sites: North and
South Dakota, 1992.
See 0242
National Priorities Ust Sites: North Carolina.
Se«0243
:; National Priorities Ust Sites: North Carolina.
="Sea0244
National Priorities Ust Sites: North Carolina,
1992.
See 0245
National Priorities List Sites: North Dakota
and South Dakota.
See 0246
National Priorities Ust Sites: Onto.
See 0247
National Priorities List Sites: Ohio.
See 0248
National Priorities Ust Sites: Ohio, 1992.
See 0249
•- National Priorftiei Ust Sites: Oklahoma.
See 02SO
: National Priorities List Sites: Oklahoma.
Sea 0251
National Priorities List Sites: Oklahoma,
1992.
See 0252
National Priorities Ust Sites: Oregon.
See 0253
National Priorities List Sites: Oregon.
See 0254
National Priorities Ust Sites: Oregon, 1992.
See 0255
National Priorities List Sites: Pennsylvania.
See 0256
National Priorities List Sites: Pennsylvania.
See 0257
National Priorities List Sites: Pennsylvania,
1992.
See 0258
National Priorities Ust Sites: Puerto Rico.
See 0259
National Priorities List Sites: Puerto Rico.
See 0260
National Priorities List Sites: Puerto Rico and
Virgin Islands, 1992.
See 0261
National Priorities List Sites: Rhode Island.
See 0262
National Priorities List Sites: Rhode Island.
See 0263
National Priorities Ust Sites: Rhode Island,
1992.
See 0264
National Priorities List Sites Set (1991).
See 0265
National Priorities List Sites: South Carolina.
See 0266
National Priorities List Sites: South Carolina.
See 0267
National Priorities List Sites: South Carolina,
1992.
See 0268
National Priorities List Sites: Tennessee.
See 0269
National Priorities List Sites: Tennessee.
See 0270
National Priorities List Sites: Tennessee,
1992.
See 0271
National Priorities List Sites: Texas.
See 0272
National Priorities List Sites: Texas.
See 0273
National Priorities List Sites: Texas, 1992.
See 0274
National Priorities List Sites: The United
States Territories, 1992.
See 0275
National Priorities List Sites: Utah.
See 0276
National Priorities List Sites: Utah.
See 0277
National Priorities Ust Sites: Utah, 1992.
See 0278
National Priorities List Sites: Vermont.
See 0279
National Priorities List Sites: Vermont.
See 0280
National Priorities Ust Sites: Vermont, 1992.
See 0281
National Priorities List Sites: Virginia.
See 0282
National Priorities List Sites: Virginia.
See 0283
National Priorities List Sites: Virginia, 1992.
See 0284
National Priorities Ust Sites: Washington.
See 0285
National Priorities List Sites: Washington.
See 0286
National Priorities Ust Sites: Washington,
1992.
See 0287
National Priorities List Sites: West Virginia.
See 0288
National Priorities List Sites: West Virginia.
See 0289
National Priorities List Sites: West Virginia,
1992.
See 0290
National Priorities List Sites: Wisconsin.
See 0291
National Priorities List Sites: Wisconsin.
See 0292
National Priorities List Sites: Wisconsin,
1992.
See 0293
National Priorities List Sites: Wyoming.
See 0294
National Priorities List Sites: Wyoming.
See 0295
National Priorities Ust Sites: Wyoming, 1992.
See 0296
National Superfund Program Priorities, Fiscal
Year 1994.
See 0298
New Policy on Performance of Risk Assess-
ments during Remedial Investigation Feasi-
bility Studies (RI/FS) Conducted by Poten-
tially Responsible Parties (PRPs).
See 1061
Notification of Out-of-State Shipments of Su-
perfund Site Wastes.
See 0429
Notification Requirements for Continuous
Releases of Hazardous Substances.
See 1148
NPL Characterization Project: National Re-
sults.
See 0355
NPL Characterization Project: Region 1 Re-
sults.
See 0356
NPL Characterization Project: Region 3 Re-
sults.
See 0357
NPL Characterization Project: Region 4 Re-
sults.
See 0358
NPL Characterization Project: Region 5 Re-
sults.
See 0359
NPL Characterization Project: Region 6 Re-
sults.
See 0360
NPL Characterization Project: Region 7 Re-
sults.
See 0361
NPL Characterization Project: Region 8 Re-
sults.
See 0362
NPL Characterization Project: Region 9 Re-
sults.
See 0363
NPL Characterization Project: Region 10 Re-
sults.
See 0364
NPL Construction Completion Definition at
Bioremediation and Soil Vapor Extraction
Sites.
See 0365
Obligation of Funds under Superfund State
Contracts.
See 0478
Obtaining a Soil and Debris Treatability Vari-
ance for Removal Actions. Superfund LDR
Guide No. 6B.
See 0430
SU-92
-------
SUBJECT INDEX
SUPERFUND
OERR Organizational Conflict of Interest
Review and Approval Program (Superfund
Management Review: Recommendation No.
46C).
See 0046
Off-Site Policy: RFA or Equivalent Investiga-
tion Requirement at RCRA Treatment and
Storage Facilities.
See 0431
Oil Notifications: Emergency Response Noti-
fication System (ERNS) Fact Sheet.
See 0930
Oil Spill Contingency Planning: National
Status. A Report to the President.
See 0931
OPA Q's and A's: Overview of the Oil Pollu-
tion Act of 1990.
See 0933
Options for Developing and Evaluating Miti-
gation Strategies for Indoor Air Impacts at
CERCLA Sites. Air/Superfund National
Technical Guidance Study Series, Report
ASF-36.
See 1415
Organic Contract Compliance Screening
System (OCCSS) Software (OLM01.8 Ver-
sion 4) (for Microcomputers).
See 0051
Organic Contract Compliance Screening
System (OCCSS) Software (OLM01.8 Ver-
sion 5) (for Microcomputers).
See 0052
OSWER Integrated Health and Safety Policy.
See 0920
OSWER Integrated Health and Safety Stand-
ard Operating Practices.
See 0921
OSWER Source Book: Training and Tech-
nology Transfer Resources.
See 1283
OSWER Source Book. Volume 1. Training
and Technology Transfer Resources, 1992-
1993.
See 1284
OSWER Source Book. Volume 2. Training
and Technology Transfer Resources, 1992-
1993.
See 1285
Overview of ERNS: Emergency Response
Notification System (ERNS) Fact Sheet.
See 0935
Overview of the Off-Site Policy for OSCs and
RPMs.
See 0433
Overview of the Outyear Liability Model
(OLM).
See 0106
Overview of the Outyear Liability Model
(OLM).
See 0107
PA Review Checklist.
See 0366
PA-Score (Preliminary Assessment Score)
User's Manual and Tutorial. Version 2.1.
See 0367
PA-Soore (Preliminary Assessment Score),
Version 1.0 (for Microcomputers).
See 0368
PA-Score (Preliminary Assessment Score),
Version 2.1, 3 1/2 inch (for Microcomput-
ers).
See 0369
PA-Score (Preliminary Assessment Score),
Version 2.1, 5 1/4 inch (for Microcomput-
ers).
See 0370
PA-Score Software, Version 1.0. Users
Manual and Tutorial.
See 0371
Performance of Risk Assessments in Reme-
dial Investigation/Feasibility Studies (Rl/
FSs) Conducted by Potentially Responsible
Parties (PRPs).
See 1102
Performance Tracking under ARCS Con-
tracts.
See 0061
Permits and Permit 'Equivalency' Processes
for CERCLA On-Site Response Actions.
See 0435
Pilot-Scale Demonstration of a Slurry-Phase
Biological Reactor for Creosote-Contaminat-
ed Soil. Applications Analysis Report.
See 1426
Pilot-Scale Incineration of Comtarninated
Soils from the Drake Chemical Superfund
Site.
See 1522
Pilot-Scale Incineration of Contaminated
Sludges from the Bofors-Nobel Superfund
Site.
See 1289
Pilot-Scale Incineration of Contaminated Soil
from the Chemical Insecticide Corporation
Superfund Site.
See 1523
Pilot-Scale Incineration of PCB-Contaminat-
ed Sediments from the New Bedford Harbor
Hot Spot Superfund Site.
See 1292
Planning for Sufficient Community Relations
(Superfund Management Review: No. 43A).
See 0108
Policy for Enforcement Actions against
Transporters under CERCLA.
See 0584
Policy for Superfund Compliance with the
RCRA Land Disposal Restrictions.
See 0436
Policy on Floodplains and Wetland Assess-
ments for CERCLA Actions.
See 0437
Policy on Management of Post-Removal Site
Control.
See 1008
Policy on Recovering Indirect Cost in
CERCLA Section 107 Cost Recovery Ac-
tions.
See 0585
Policy Towards Owners of Residential Prop-
erty at Superfund Sites.
See 0586
Political Subdivision Involvement in Super-
fund.
See 0479
Political Subdivision Involvement in Super-
fund.
See 0480
Preliminary Ranking Evaluation Score
(PREscore) Version 1.1 (for Microcomput-
ers).
See 0372
Preliminary Ranking Evaluation Score
(PREscore) Version 2.0 (for Microcomput-
ers).
See 0373
Preparation of Hazardous Waste Referrals.
See 0588
PREscore Software. Users Manual and Tuto-
rial. Version 1.0.
See 0374
PREscore Software: Users Manual and Tuto-
rial Version 2.0.
See 0375
Presentations EPA-State Soil Standards
Conference. Held in Crystal City, Virginia on
January 29, 1991.
See 1524
Presumptive Remedies: Policy and Proce-
dures.
See 1103
Presumptive Remedies: Site Characterization
and Technology Selection for CERCLA Sites
with Volatile Organic Compounds in Soils.
See 1104
Presumptive Remedy for CERCLA Municipal
Landfill Sites.
See 1105
Priority for Health and Safety Requirements,
Especially Medical Surveillance Require-
ments, for EPA Employees Who Support
OSWER Programs.
See 0923
Procedure for Use of USAGE Preplaced
Contracts to Expedite Superfund Cleanup
Tasks.
See 1131
Procedures for Documenting Costs for
CERCLA Section 107 Actions.
See 0590
Procedures for Transmittal of CERCLA and
RCRA Civil Judicial Enforcement Case Pack-
ages to Headquarters.
See 0591
Procedures to Ensure that CLP Laboratories
Are Not Paid for Non-Compliant or Unuse-
able Data.
See 0062
Procuring Innovative Technologies at Reme-
dial Sites: Q's and A's and Case Studies.
See 1132
Progress Toward Implementing Superfund.
Fiscal Year 1988.
See 0299
Progress Toward Implementing Superfund.
Fiscal Year 1989.
See 0300
Progress Toward Implementing Superfund,
Fiscal Year 1990: A Report to the Congress.
See 0301
Progress Toward Implementing Superfund,
Fiscal Year 1991. Report to Congress.
See 0302
Proposed Method to Evaluate the Effective-
ness of Community Involvement in Super-
fund (Superfund Management Review: Rec-
ommendation Number 43.A).
See 0109
Prospects for In situ Chemical Treatment for
Contaminated Soil.
See 1525
PRP Search Supplemental Guidance for
Sites in the Superfund Remedial Program.
See 0592
Public Awareness Signs at Superfund Sites.
See 0481
Quality and Environmental Protection: The
EPA QA Program.
See 0990
Quality Assurance for Superfund Environ-
mental Data Collection Activities.
See 0991
Quality Assurance/Quality Control Guidance
for Removal Activities: Sampling QA/QC
Plan and Data Validation Procedures.
See 0993
Quantifying Effects in Ecological Site As-
sessments: Biological and Statistical Consid-
erations.
See 1063
Questions and Answers About the State
Role in Remedy Selection at Non-Fund-Fi-
nanced Enforcement Sites.
See 0482
Questions and Answers on Release Notifica-
tion Requirements and Reportable Quantity
Adjustments.
See 1149
RCRA, Superfund Monthly Hot Line Reports.
See 0303
SU-93
-------
SUPERFUND
SUBJECT INDEX
Real Estate Acquisition Procedures for
USAGE Projects.
See 1133
Reassignment of CLP Transportation Func-
;;:, • {tons.
,, Sea 0063 ..................... '
i Reductive Dchatogonation of Organic Con-
i. taniinants in Soils and Ground Water.
ii. Ground Water Issue,
" §e« 1527 .' ,.„" ""
||j fiegtonal Guide: issuing Site-Specific Treat-
! abllfty Variances for Contaminated Soils and
! Debris from Land Disposal Restrictions
(LDRs).
SCO 1528
Regional Oversight of Federal Facility Clean-
ups under CEROLA.
Sea 0900
...... Regional pilot Projects and Initiatives.
ii; SCO 0064
Regional Pilots and Applications of Super-
fund Accelerated Cleanup Model (SACM).
SeeOIIQ
Regional Quality Control Guidance for NPL
Candidate Sites,
Sea 0376
Releasing Identities of Potentially Responsi-
ble Parties in Response to FOIA Requests.
See 0594
Releasing information to Potentially Respon-
sible Parties at CERCLA Sites.
Sea 0595
Remedial Action Report: Documentation for
Operable Unit Completion.
Remedial Investigation: Site Characterization
,:: ....... and Treatability Studies.
"Sea 1106
"-Removal Cost Management System: Version
3.2.
........ SMIOO? ..........................
............. Removal Program Representative Sampling
Guidance, Volume 1. Soil.
Sea 1010
Report to Congress: Settlements with Munic-
Ipal Waste Generators and Transporters
Slnc« 1991 under the Comprehensive Envi-
ronmental Response, Compensation, and Li-
ability Act of 1980.
See 0596
Reporting and Exchange of Information on
State Enforcement Actions at National Prior-
ities List Sites.
See 0483
Reporting Requirements for Continuous Re-
;,;;,, teases, of ..... Hazardous ...... Substances; A Guide,,
"-for Facilities and Vessels on Compliance.
"- See 1150 .......................
'.",' Aooufoch Pneumatic Fracturing Extraction
"!! and Hot Gas Injection, Phase 1. Applications
Analysts Report.
See 1190
Application of Tradescantia Micronucleus
j'l Assay for In situ Evaluation of Potential Ge-
netic Hazards from Exposure to Chemicals
at a Wood-Preserving Site.
Soa1195
Asymmetric Loss .Function for Superfund Re-
mediation Decisions.
Sae 1200
Bench-Scale Evaluation of Alternative Bio-
logical Treatment Processes for the Remedi-
ation of Pentachlorophenpl- and Creosote-
Contaminated Materials: Slurry-Phase Biore-
modlatton.
Soo1419
Bench-Scale Evaluation of Alternative Bio-
logical Treatment Processes for the Remedi-
""/Mbn of Pantachlorpphenol- and Creosote-
;™; Contaminated Materials: Solid-Phase_Biqre-
........... imtdtatfon. .......................
8091420
Chemical Stabilization of Mixed Organic and
Metal Compounds. EPA SITE Program Dem-
onstration of the Silicate Technology Corpo-
ration Process.
See 1212
Control Technologies for Remediation of
Contaminated Soil and Waste Deposits at
Superfund Lead Battery Recycling Sites.
See 1221
Control Technology: Estimating Innovative
Technology Costs for the SITE Program.
See 1222
Cost Estimating Systems for Remedial
Action Projects.
See 1123
Demonstration of Microfiltration Technology.
See 1228
Detoxification of Pentachlorophenol and Cre-
osote Contaminated Groundwater by Physi-
cal Extraction: Chemical and Biological As-
sessment.
See 1438
Engineering Bulletins: Aids to the Develop-
ment of Remedial Alternatives.
See 1236
EPA SITE Demonstration of the BioTrol Soil
Washing Process.
See 1502
Evaluation of Waste Stabilized by the Solidi-
tech SITE Technology.
See 1554
Factors Affecting the Applicability of Plasma
Systems to the Cleanup of Superfund Sites.
See 1250
Incineration Treatment of Arsenic-Contami-
nated Soil.
See 1268
Long-Path FTIR Measurements of Volatile
Organic Compounds in an Industrial Setting
(July 1989-April 1991).
See 1413
Management Systems Review of the Super-
fund RI/FS: Opportunities for Streamlining.
See 1101
PAST: The Potential ARARs Selection Tool.
See 0434
Personnel Protection through Reconnais-
sance Robotics at Superfund Remedial
Sites.
See 1286
Pilot-Scale Incinerability Evaluation of Ar-
senic-and Lead-Contaminated Soils from
Two Superfund Sites.
See 1288
Pilot-Scale Incineration of PCB-Contaminat-
ed Sediments from the Hot Spot of the New
Bedford Harbor Superfund Site.
See 1291
Remediation of Contaminated Soils by Sol-
vent Rushing.
See 1529
Results from the Stabilization Technologies
Evaluated by the Site Program. New Eng-
land Environmental Expo 90.
See 1558
SITE Demonstration of the Basic Extractive
Sludge Treatment Process.
See 1300
SITE Demonstration of the CF Systems Or-
ganics Extraction System.
See 1301
SITE Program Demonstration of the SBP
Technologies, Inc., Membrane Filtration
System on Creosote-Contaminated Water.
See 1592
Small Systems Meet Superfund Challenge
with Point-of-Entry Treatment Units.
See 1304
Solvent Extraction Processes: A Survey of
Systems in the SITE Program.
See 1305
Sorptipn, Important in Stabilized/Solidified
Waste Forms.
See 1563
Superfund Soils Data Management System.
See 1536
Treatment of Nonhazardous Petroleum-Con-
taminated Soils by Thermal Desorption
Technologies.
See 1547
U.S. EPA SITE Demonstration of AWD Tech-
nologies' AquaDetox/SVE System.
See 1363
Use of Electrokinetics for Hazardous Waste
Site Remediation.
See 1366
Will Soil Working Work for the Sand Creek
Superfund Site.
See 1548
Required Contracts Management Training
for Regional Superfund Personnel.
See 0065
Resources for Preparing Independent Gov-
ernment Estimates for Remedial Contracting
Work Assignments.
See 0066
Response Action Contractor Final Indemnifi-
cation Guidelines. Volume 2, Number 1,
March 1993.
See 0067
Revised EPA Guidance on Parallel Proceed-
ings.
See 0597
Revised Hazard Ranking System: An Im-
proved Tool for Screening Superfund Sites.
See 0377
Revised Hazard Ranking System: Back-
ground Information.
See 0378
Revised Hazard Ranking System: Evaluating
Sites After Waste Removals.
See 0379
Revised Hazard Ranking System (HRS):
Final Rule.
See 0380
Revised Hazard Ranking System: Qs and
As.
See 0381
Revised Hazardous Waste Bankruptcy Guid-
ance.
See 0598
Revised Hazardous Waste Bankruptcy Guid-
ance, October 7, 1991.
See 0599
Revised Interim Final Guidance on Indian In-
volvement in the Superfund Program.
See 0484
Revised Policy on Discretionary Information
Release under CERCLA.
See 0600
Revised Procedures for Implementing Off-
Site Response Actions.
See 0601
Revision of Policy Regarding Superfund
Project Assignment between Alternative Re-
medial Contracting Strategy Contractors and
the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers.
See 0068
Revisions to OMB Circular A-94 on Guide-
lines and Discount Rates for Benefit-Cost
Analysis.
See 1107
Revisions to the Interim Guidance on PRP
Participation in Remedial Investigations and
Feasibility Studies.
See 0603
RI/FS Improvements.
See 1108
RI/FS Improvements Follow-Up.
See 1109
SU-94
i,'I iSil! JCtlilL
i,i KIM I ill , Sllli ! liik i ",» i,,; »!*•• i.il!iiii :
ii II
] i>l .;! ,1 iiilE
-------
SUBJECT INDEX
SUPERFUND
RI/FS Streamlining.
See 1110
Risk Assessment Guidance for Superfund.
Volume 1. Human Health Evaluation Manual.
Part A, April 1990.
See 1066
Risk Assessment Guidance for Superfund.
Volume 1. Human Health Evaluation Manual
(Part B).
See 1067
Risk Assessment Guidance for Superfund.
Volume 1. Human Health Evaluation Manual
(Part B, Development of Risk-Based Prelimi-
nary Remediation Goals).
See 1068
Risk Assessment Guidance for Superfund.
Volume 1. Human Health Evaluation Manual
(Part C).
See 1069
Risk Assessment Guidance for Superfund.
Volume 1. Human Health Evaluation Manual
(Part C, Risk Evaluation of Remedial Alterna-
tives).
See 1070
Risk Assessment Guidance for Superfund.
Volume 1. Human Health Evaluation Manual.
Supplemental Guidance: 'Standard Default
Exposure Factors'.
See 1071
Risk Assessment in Superfund: A Primer.
First Edition, September 1990.
See 1073
ROD Annual Report, FY 1989.
See 1111
ROD Annual Report, FY 1990.
See 1112
ROD Annual Report, FY1991. Volume 1.
See 1113
ROD Annual Report, FY1991. Volume 2.
See 1114
ROD Annual Report, FY 1992.
See 1115
Role of Community Interviews in the Devel-
opment of a Community Relations Program
for Remedial Response.
See 0485
Role of Expedited Response Actions under
SARA.
See 1116
Role of the Baseline Risk Assessment in
Superfund Remedy Selection Decisions.
See 1075
Roles and Responsibilities of Deputy Project
Officers and Work Assignment Managers
under the Technical Enforcement Support
(TES) Contracts.
See 0069
Roles and Responsibilities of Regional
Project Officers, Zone Project Officers, Work
Assignment Managers and Contracting Offi-
cers for the RCRA Enforcement, Permitting
and Assistance Contracts (REPA).
See 0070
Roles and Responsibilities of Regional
Project Officers and Headquarters Zone
Project Officers for Management of TES
(TES 5) Contracts.
See 0604
Rotating Biological Contactors. Engineering
Bulletin.
See 1297
SACM Regional Decision Teams: Interim
Guidance. Volume 1, Number 5, December
1992.
See 0111
Sampler's Guide to the Contract Laboratory
Program.
See 0071
Scope of the CERCLA Petroleum Exclusion
under Sections 101(14) and 104(a)(2).
See 0605
Scoper's Notes: An RI/FS Costing Guide.
Bringing in a Quality RI/FS on Time and
Within Budget.
See 1117
Sector Sampling for VOC's during Remedi-
ation of Superfund Site at Shaver's Farm,
Georgia.
See 1417
Selection of Control Technologies for Reme-
diation of Lead Battery Recycling Sites. (En-
gineering Bulletin).
See 1298
Site Assessment: Evaluating Risks at Super-
fund Sites.
See 1076
Site Assessment Information Directory
(SAID) Region 1 (for Microcomputers). Date
of Coverage: October 1991.
See 0382
Site Assessment Information Directory
(SAID) Region 2 (for Microcomputers). Date
of Coverage: October 1991.
See 0383
Site Assessment Information Directory
(SAID) Region 3 (for Microcomputers). Date
of Coverage: October 1991.
See 0384
Site Assessment Information Directory
(SAID) Region 4 (for Microcomputers). Date
of Coverage: October 1991.
See 0385
Site Assessment Information Directory
(SAID) Region 5 (for Microcomputers). Date
of Coverage: 1991.
See 0386
Site Assessment Information Directory
(SAID) Region 6 (for Microcomputers). Date
of Coverage: October 1991.
See 0387
Site Assessment Information Directory
(SAID) Region 7 (for Microcomputers). Date
of Coverage: October 1991.
See 0388
Site Assessment Information Directory
(SAID) Region 8 (for Microcomputers). Date
of Coverage: 1991.
See 0389
Site Assessment Information Directory
(SAID) Region 9 (for Microcomputers). Date
of Coverage: October 1991.
See 0390
Site Assessment Information Directory
(SAID) Region 10 (for Microcomputers). Date
of Coverage: October 1991.
See 0391
Site Classification Changes from Enforce-
ment to Fund Lead.
See 0606
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
Frequency by Party Name Report
See 0607
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
Frequency by Party Name Report.
See 0608
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
Frequency by Party Name Report.
See 0609
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
Frequency by PRP Name Report, September
26, 1991.
See 0610
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)
(National).
See 0611
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
National Alphabetical Report by PRP Name,
September 26, 1991.
See 0612
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)
(National) (for Microcomputers).
See 0613
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
National Frequency by PRP Name Report.
See 0614
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
National PRP Listing Alphabetically by PRP
Name.
See 0615
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
National PRP Listing Alphabetically by PRP
Name.
See 0616
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
National PRP Listing by Site.
See 0617
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
National PRP Listing by Site.
See 0618
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
National PRP Report by Site, September 26,
1991.
See 0619
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)
(National - 3 1/2 Inch Diskette, IBM PS/2
Compatible) (for Microcomputers).
See 0620
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Alabama.
See 0621
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Alabama.
See 0622
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Alabama.
See 0623
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for American Samoa.
See 0624
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for American Samoa.
See 0625
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for American Samoa.
See 0626
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Arizona.
See 0627
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Arizona.
See 0628
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Arizona.
See 0629
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Arkansas.
See 0630
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Arkansas.
See 0631
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Arkansas.
See 0632
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for California.
See 0633
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for California.
See 0634
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for California.
See 0635
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Colorado.
See 0636
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Colorado.
See 0637
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Colorado.
See 0638
SU-95
-------
SUPERFUND
SUBJECT INDEX
Hi;
,, Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Connecticut
Soa 0639
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Connecticut
Sea 0640
••Sita Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
ii PRP Listing by Site for Connecticut
Saa 0641
Sita Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
i PRP Listing by Site for Delaware.
^Sm 064.2
Site EnfOTcement Jraiking System (SETS):
6 P;RP Usting by Site for Delaware.
Sea 0643
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP UsSng by Site for Delaware.
Sea 0644
Site Enforcement Jraekjng System (SETS):
;,' PR? Listing by Site for Florida.
See 0645
: Sita Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
I PRP Listing by Site for Florida.
Seo 0646
Sita Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
;; £PP Ustfng by Site for Florida.
Saa 0647
: Sita Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
i...fpR Listing by Site for Georgia.
Sea 0648
„ Sita Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
" PRP Listing by Site for Georgia.
See 0649
Sita Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PHP Listing by Site for Georgia.
See 0650
I SRa Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
' PRP Usling by Site for Idaho.
See 0651
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
i PRP Listing by Site for Idaho.
Sea 0652
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP LisUng by Site for Idaho.
Sea 0653
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
1 PRP Listing by Site for Illinois.
Sea 0654
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Illinois.
Sea 0655
! Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Illinois.
i, See 0656
lijtal Enforcement"tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Indiana.
See 0657
! Sjte]" Enforcemeni Irackjpg System (SETS):
] P.RP (Jstlng by Site for Indiana.
Saa 0658
I S(te Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
; PPP Listing by Site for Indiana.
!§ee065f „
Stta Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Iowa.
,,§000660
Sita Enforcement tracking System (SETS):
1 PRP Listing by Site for Iowa.
See 0661
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Iowa.
See 0662
•Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PHP Listing by Site for Kansas.
, See 0663
Site Enforcement tracking System (SETS):
; EPE Listing by Site for Kansas.
See 0664
Stta Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Kansas.
SQQ 0665
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Kentucky.
See 0666
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Kentucky.
See 0667
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Kentucky.
See 0668
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Louisiana.
See 0669
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Louisiana.
See 0670
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Louisiana.
See 0671
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Maine.
See 0672
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Maine.
See 0673
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Maine.
See 0674
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Maryland.
See 0675
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Maryland.
See 0676
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Maryland.
See 0677
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Massachusetts.
See 0678
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Massachusetts.
See 0679
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Massachusetts.
See 0680
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Michigan.
See 0681
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Michigan.
See 0682
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Michigan.
See 0683
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Minnesota.
See 0684
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Minnesota.
See 0685
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Minnesota.
See 0686
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Mississippi.
See 0687
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Mississippi.
See 0688
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Mississippi.
See 0689
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Missouri.
See 0690
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Missouri.
See 0691
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Missouri.
See Q692
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Montana.
See 0693
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Montana.
See 0694
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Montana.
See 0695
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Nebraska.
See 0696
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Nebraska.
See 0697
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Nebraska.
See 0698
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Nevada.
See 0699
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Nevada.
See 0700
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Nevada.
See 0701
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for New Hampshire.
See 0702
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for New Hampshire.
See 0703
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for New Hampshire.
See 0704
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for New Jersey.
See 0705
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for New Jersey.
See 0706
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for New Jersey.
See 0707
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for New Mexico.
See 0708
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for New Mexico.
See 0709
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for New Mexico.
See 0710
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for New York.
See 0711
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for New York.
See 0712
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for New York.
See 0713
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for North Carolina.
See 0714
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for North Carolina.
See 0715
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for North Carolina.
See 0716
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for North Dakota.
See 0717
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for North Dakota.
See 0718
SU-96
-------
SUBJECT INDEX
SUPERFUND
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for North Dakota.
See 0719
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Northern Marianas.
See 0720
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Northern Marianas.
See 0721
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Northern Marianas.
See 0722
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Ohio.
See 0723
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Ohio.
See 0724
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Ohio.
See 0725
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Oklahoma.
See 0726
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Oklahoma.
See 0727
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Oklahoma.
See 0728
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Oregon.
See 0729
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Oregon.
See 0730
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Oregon.
See 0731
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Pennsylvania.
See 0732
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Pennsylvania.
See 0733
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Pennsylvania.
See 0734
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Puerto Rico.
See 0735
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Puerto Rico,
See 0736
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Puerto Rico.
See 0737
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 1.
See 0738
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 1.
See 0739
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 1.
See 0740
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 1, January
22, 1992.
See 0741
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 1. Volume 1.
See 0742
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 2.
See 0743
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 2.
See 0744
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 2.
See 0745
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 2, January
22, 1992.
See 0746
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 2. Volume 2.
See 0747
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 3.
See 0748
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 3.
See 0749
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 3, January
22, 1992.
See 0750
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 3. Volume 3.
See 0751
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 4.
See 0752
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 4.
See 0753
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 4.
See 0754
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 4, January
22, 1992.
See 0755
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 4. Volume 4.
See 0756
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 5.
See 0757
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 5.
See 0758
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 5.
See 0759
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 5, January
22, 1992.
See 0760
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 5. Volume 5.
See 0761
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 6.
See 0762
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 6.
See 0763
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 6.
See 0764
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 6, January
22, 1992.
See 0765
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 6. Volume 6.
See 0766
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 7.
See 0767
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 7.
See 0768
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 7.
See 0769
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 7, January
22, 1992.
See 0770
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 7. Volume 7.
See 0771
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 8.
See 0772
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 8.
See 0773
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 8.
. See 0774
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 8, January
22, 1992.
See 0775
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 8. Volume 8.
See 0776
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 9. -
See 0777
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 9.
See 0778
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 9.
See 0779
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 9, January
22, 1992.
See 0780
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 9. Volume 9.
See 0781
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 10.
See 0782
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 10.
See 0783
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 10.
See 0784
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 10, January
22, 1992.
See 0785
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 10. Volume
10.
See 0786
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Rhode Island.
See 0787
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Rhode Island.
See 0788
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Rhode Island.
See 0789
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for South Carolina.
See 0790
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for South Carolina.
See 0791
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for South Carolina.
See 0792
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for South Dakota.
See 0793
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for South Dakota.
See 0794
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for South Dakota.
See 0795
SU-97
-------
SUPERFUND
SUBJECT INDEX
She Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Usting by Site for Tennessee.
See 0796
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Tennessee.
Sea 0797
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Usting by Site for Tennessee.
See 0798
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Usting by Site for Texas.
See 0799
Stt« Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Usting by Sfte for Texas.
See 0800
SWa Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Usting by Site for Texas.
See 0801
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Usting by Site for Trust Territories.
,308,0802 ....................................
Site Enforcement tracking System (SETS):
PRP Usting by Site for Trust Territories.
See 0803
Site Enforcement tracking System (SETS):
II, PRP Usting by Site for trust Territories.
SooOOCM
jjite Enforcernenl Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Usting by Site for Utah.
See 0805
: Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Usting by Site for Utah.
Sea 0806
"Site Enforcement tracking System (SETS):
PRP Usting by Site for Utah.
See 0807
•§|te Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Usting by Site for Vermont.
Sea 0808
§tta Enforcement tracking System (SETS):
; PRP Usting by Site for Vermont.
Saa0809
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
! PRP Usting by Site for Vermont.
See 0910
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Virginia.
| Enforcement tracking System (SETS):
iJ?PP Listing by Site for Virginia.
'•'See 0612
'Site Enforcement tracking System (SETS):
PRP Usting by Site for Washington.
See 0813
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Usting by Site for Washington.
Sea Q814
fSfte Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Usting by Site for Washington.
Ehf
-------
SUBJECT INDEX
SUPERFUND
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)
(Region 10) (for Microcomputers).
See 0868
Site-Specific Contracting for Removals.
See 1011
Small Cost Recovery Referrals.
See 0869
Smart Moves in Superfund - Regional Initia-
tives. Volume 1, Number 1, February 1992.
See 0305
Smart Moves in Superfund - Regional Pilots
and Initiatives. Volume 1, Number 2, Sep-
tember 1992.
See 0306
Smart Moves in Superfund - Revitalization
One Year Later. Volume 1, Number 3, Janu-
ary 1993.
See 0307
Soliditech, Inc. Solidification/Stabilization
Process: Applications Analysis Report.
See 1562
Some Major Factors Important in Establish-
ing Land Use Policy for Remediated Super-
fund Sites.
See 0308
Specifications and Guidance for Contami-
nant-Free Sample Containers.
See 0994
SRIS System Overview and User's Guide.
See 0112
Standard Document for Remedial Site As-
sessment Decisions.
See 0392
Standard Operating Safety Guides.
See 0924
Standard Operating Safety Guides.
See 0925
Status of Key SACM Program Management
Issues: Interim Guidance, Volume 1, Number
1, December 1992.
See 0113
Status of Regional Superfund Pilots: End-of-
Year Report.
See 0309
Status of State Involvement in the Superfund
Program, FY 80 to FY 89.
See 0114
Streamlined Approach for Settlements with
De Minimis Waste Contributors under
CERCLA Section 122(g)(1)(A).
See 0870
Streamlining the RI/FS for CERCLA Munici-
pal Landfill Sites.
See 1118
Streamlining the RI/FS for CERCLA Munici-
pal Landfill Sites.
See 1119
Structure and Components of Five-Year Re-
views.
See 1120
Structure and Components of Five-Year Re-
views.
See 1121
Submittal of Ten-Point Settlement Analyses
for CERCLA Consent Decrees.
See 0871
Subsurface Contamination Reference Guide.
See 1474
Suggested ROD Language for Various
Ground Water Remediation Options.
See 1475
Summary of GIS Support to Superfund.
See 1307
Summary of 'Guidance of Landowner Liabil-
ity under Section 107(a)1 of CERCLA, De
Minimis Settlements under Section
122(g)(1)(b) of CERCLA, and Settlements
with Prospective Purchasers of Contaminat-
ed Property'.
See 0872
Summary of 'Guidance on CERCLA Section
106(a) UAOs for RD/RA'.
See 0873
Summary of 'Guidance on Documenting De-
cisions Not to Take Cost Recovery Actions'.
See 0874
Summary of 'Interim Guidance: Streamlining
the CERCLA Settlement Decision Process'.
See 0875
Summary of 'Interim Guidelines for Preparing
NBARs'.
See 0876
Summary of 'Interim Policy on CERCLA Set-
tlements Involving Municipalities and Munici-
pal Wastes'.
See 0877
Summary of 'Methodologies for Implementa-
tion of CERCLA Section 122(g)(1)(a) De
Minimis Waste Contributor Settlements'.
See 0878
Summary of 'Notification of Out-of-State
Shipments of Superfund Site Wastes'.
See 0438
Summary of 'PRP Search Supplemental
Guidance for Sites in the Superfund Remedi-
al Program'.
See 0879
Summary of 'Releasing Information to Poten-
tially Responsible Parties at CERCLA Sites'.
See 0880
Summary of Treatment Technology Effec-
tiveness for Contaminated Soil.
See 1533
Superfund Accelerated Cleanup Bulletin:
Presumptive Remedies for Municipal Landfill
Sites. Volume 2, Number 1, February 1993.
See 0115
Superfund Accelerated Cleanup Bulletin:
Presumptive Remedies for Wood Treatment
Facilities. Volume 1, Number 2, May 1992.
See 0116
Superfund Accelerated Cleanup Bulletin.
Volume 1, Number 1. Presumptive Remedies
for Municipal Landfill Sites.
See 0117
Superfund Accelerated Cleanup Bulletin.
Volume 1, Number 3. Presumptive Reme-
dies.
See 0118
Superfund Accelerated Cleanup Model
(SACM).
See 0119
Superfund Accelerated Cleanup Model
(SACM) Coordination Strategy.
See 0120
Superfund Accelerated Cleanup Model
(SACM). Volume 1, Number 4, November
1992.
See 0122
Superfund Administrative Improvements. Ex-
ecutive Summary.
See 0310
Superfund Administrative Improvements.
Final Report.
See 0311
Superfund Administrative Improvements:
Reinventing Superfund.
See 0312
Superfund Analytical Review and Oversight.
See 0995
Superfund and Small Waste Contributors.
See 0881
Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Clean-
up Efforts Nationwide (Bog Creek Farm).
See 0940
Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Clean-
up Efforts Nationwide (City Industries).
See 0941
Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Clean-
up Efforts Nationwide, Fall 1992. (American
Thermostat Corporation, New York).
See 0942
Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Clean-
up Efforts Nationwide, Fall 1992. (Celanese
Corporation Site Profile).
See 0943
Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Clean-
up Efforts Nationwide, Fall 1992. (Ciba-Geigy
Corporation, Mclntosh, Alabama).
See 0944
Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Clean-
up Efforts Nationwide, Fail 1992. (Krysowaty
Farm, Hillsborough, New Jersey).
See 0945
Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Clean-
up Efforts Nationwide, Fall 1992. (Lans-
downe Radioactive Residence Site Profile).
See 0946
Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Clean-
up Efforts Nationwide, Fall 1992. (Valley of
the Drums, Bullitt County, Kentucky).
See 0947
Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Clean-
up Efforts Nationwide, Fall 1992. (Wide
Beach Section of Brant, New York).
See 0948
Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Clean-
up Efforts Nationwide, Fall 1993 (Big D
Campground Site Profile, Ashtabula County,
Kingsville, Ohio).
See 0949
Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Clean-
up Efforts Nationwide, Fall 1993 (Brown
Wood Preserving Site Profile, Suwanee
County, Florida).
See 0950
Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Clean-
up Efforts Nationwide, Fall 1993 (Bunker Hill
Site Profile, Silver Valley, Northern Idaho).
See 0951
Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Clean-
up Efforts Nationwide, Fall 1993 (Johns-
Manville Site Profile, Illinois).
See 0952
Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Clean-
up Efforts Nationwide (McKin Company).
See 0953
Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Clean-
up Efforts Nationwide, Spring 1993 (French
Limited Site Profile, Harris County, Texas).
See 0954
Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Clean-
up Efforts Nationwide, Spring 1993 (Fulton
Terminals Site Profile, Oswego County, NY).
See 0955
Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Clean-
up Efforts Nationwide, Spring 1993 (Harvey
and Knott Drum Site, New Castle County,
Delaware).
See 0956
Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Clean-
up Efforts Nationwide, Spring 1993 (Old Mid-
land Products Site Profile, Yell County, Ar-
kansas).
See 0957
Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Clean-
up Efforts Nationwide, Spring 1993 (Powers-
ville Site Profile, Peach County, Georgia).
See 0958
Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Clean-
up Efforts Nationwide, Spring 1993 (Radium
Chemical Site Profile, Queens, New York).
See 0959
Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Clean-
up Efforts Nationwide, Spring 1993 (Triana/
Tennessee River Site, Alabama).
See 0960
Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Clean-
up Efforts Nationwide, Spring 1993 (United
Chrome Products Site Profile).
See 0961
SU-99
-------
SUPERFUND
1" Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Clean-
up Efforts Nationwide. Summer 1993 (Army
Crook Landfill Site Profile, New Castle, Dela-
ware).
........ , ..... _ ........ „ ............. :
SupWfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Clean-
: up Efforts Nationwide, Summer 1993 (Chis-
" man Crock Site Profile, York County, Virgin-
ia).
Sea 0963
Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Clean-
up Efforts Nationwide, Summer 1993 (Coal
Creek Site Profile, Chehalis, Washington).
Sea 0964
..... Suporfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Clean-
| Op Efforts Nationwide, Summer 1993
(Common Steps in the Removal Process).
See 0965
Suporfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Clean-
up Efforts Nationwide, Summer 1993 (East-
am Diversified Metals Site Profile, Schuylkill
County, Pennsylvania).
See 0966
Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Clean-
up Efforts Nationwide, Summer 1993 (Fike/
-Mel Chemical Site Profile, Nitro, West Vir-
Sea 0967 ...........................
'- Supoffund at Work: Hazardous Waste Clean-
!!! up Efforts Nationwide, Summer 1993 (North-
; side Landfill Site Pjofile, Spokane, Washing-
; ton).
See 0968
i Suportund at Work: Hazardous Waste Clean-
i Op Efforts Nationwide, Summer 1993 (Rogue
Valtey/Ditcn Creek Ranch Site Profile,
t Winter, Oregon).
8000969
| Suporfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Clean-
flip Efforts Nationwide, Summer 1993 (Tri-
..... -State Plating Site Profile, Columbus, Indi-
ilrta).
,-,'See, 0970
, Suporfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Clean-
up Efforts Nationwide (White Chemical).
See 0971
Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Clean-
: up Efforts Nationwide, Winter 1993. (Wells G
and H Site, Wobum, Massachusetts).
Soe 0972
Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Clean-
up Efforts Nationwide, Winter 1994 (Bailey
Waste Disposal Site Profile, Texas).
See 0973
Sgporfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Clean-
up Efforts Nationwide, Winter 1994 (New
Brighton Site Profile, Minneapolis/St. Paul,
Minnesota).
Sea 0974
Superfund at Work; Hazardous Waste Clean-
up Efforts Nationwide, Winter 1994 (Sey-
mour Recycling Site Profile, Seymour, Indi-
ana),
See 0975
Suporfund Contracts Management Issues.
Sea 0072 [[[
""Superfund" Cost Recovery Strategy."
Sea 0882
Superfund Desk Reference for Municipali-
"tl0t.
!_Sf«0486
Supwfund Docket Operations Manual for
Rutemaktng Activities.
Sea 0081
Suporfund Emergency Response Actions: A
..... Surnmary of Federally-Funded Removals.
Fifth Annual Report - Fiscal Year 1990.
Sea 0313
Suporfund Emergency Response Actions: A
-Surnrrtary of Federally Funded Removals.
Fourth Annual Report - Fiscal Year 1989.
See 0314
SUBJECT INDEX
Superfund Emergency Response Actions: A
Summary of Federally-Funded Removals.
Sixth Annual Report, Fiscal Year 1991.
See 0315
Superfund Enforcement Strategy and Imple-
mentation Plan.
See 0883
Superfund Engineering Issue: Considerations
for Evaluating the Impact of Metals Partition-
ing during the Incineration' of Contaminated
Soils from Superfund Sites.
See 1534
Superfund Engineering Issue: Issues Affect-
ing the Applicability and Success of Remedi-
al/Removal Incineration Projects.
See 1308
Superfund Engineering Issue: Treatment of
Lead-Contaminated Soils.
See 1535
Superfund: Environmental Progress.
See 0976
Superfund: EPA/ICMA Superfund Revitaliza-
tion Conference. Held in Chicago, Illinois on
November 12-13, 1992.
See 0319
Superfund: EPA/ICMA Superfund Revitaliza-
tion Conference. Held in San Francisco,
California on February 1-2, 1993.
See 0320
Superfund Fact Sheet: An Overview.
See 0487
Superfund Fact Sheet: Arsenic.
See 0488
Superfund Fact Sheet: Benzene.
See 0489
Superfund Fact Sheet: Community Inter-
views.
See 0490
Superfund Fact Sheet: Exposure Pathways.
See 0393
Superfund Fact Sheet: Identifying Sites.
See 0491
Superfund Fact Sheet: PCBs.
See 0492
Superfund Fact Sheet: Public Involvement.
See 0493
Superfund Fact Sheet: The Remedial Pro-
gram.
See 0494
Superfund Fact Sheet: The Removal Pro-
gram.
See 0495
Superfund Fact Sheet: Trichloroethylene.
See 0496
SUPERFUND: Focusing on the Nation at
Large. A Decade of Progress at National
Priorities List Sites.
See 0321
Superfund: Focusing on the Nation at Large.
A Decade of Progress at National Priorities
List Sites.
See 0322
Superfund: Focusing on the Nation at Large.
1991 Update.
See 0323
Superfund Ground Water Issue. Contaminant
Transport in Fractured Media: Models for
Decision Makers.
See 1477
Superfund Guide: Clean Air Act Hazardous
Air Pollutants Added to the List of CERCLA
Hazardous Substances.
See 1151
Superfund Guide: Reportable Quantity Ad-
justment for Methyl Isocyanate (MIC).
See 1152
Superfund Guide to RCRA Management Re-
quirements for Mineral Processing Wastes.
See 0439
.
Superfund Information Repositories and Ad-
ministrative Records: Introduction for Librar-
ians.
See 0497
Superfund Information Repositories and Ad-
ministrative Records.
See 0884
Superfund Innovative Technology Evaluation
Program: Annual Report to Congress 1992.
See 1309
Superfund Innovative Technology Evaluation
Program Demonstration Plan for Westing-
house Bio-Analytic Systems Pentachloro-
phenol Immunoassays.
See 1310
Superfund Innovative Technology Evaluation
Program: Spring Update to the Technology
Profiles. Fourth Edition.
See 1314
Superfund Innovative Technology Evaluation
Program: Technology Profiles, November
1989.
See 1317
Superfund Innovative Technology Evaluation
Program: Technology Profiles, Sixth Edition.
See 1318
Superfund Innovative Technology Evaluation
Technology Demonstration Summary: Chem-
fix Solidification/Stabilization Process, Clack-
amas, Oregon.
See 1564
Superfund Innovative Technology Evalua-
tion: The Delaware SITE Study, 1989.
See 1322
Superfund LDR Guide No. 1: Overview of
RCRA Land Disposal Restrictions (LDRs).
See 0440
Superfund LDR Guide No. 2: Complying with
the California List Restrictions under Land
Disposal Restrictions (LDRs).
See 0441
Superfund LDR Guide No. 3: Treatment
Standards and Minimum Technology Re-
quirements under Land Disposal Restrictions
(LDRS).
See 0442
Superfund LDR Guide No. 4: Complying with
the Hammer Restrictions under Land Dis-
posal Restrictions (LDRs).
See 0443
Superfund LDR Guide No. 5: Determining
When Land Disposal Restrictions (LDRs) Are
'Applicable' to CERCLA Response Actions.
See 0444
Superfund LDR Guide No. 6A (2nd Edition)
Obtaining a Soil and Debris Treatability Vari-
ance for Remedial Actions.
See 0445
Superfund LDR Guide No. 7. Determining
When Land Disposal Restrictions (LDRs) Are
Relevant and Appropriate to CERCLA Re-
sponse Actions.
See 0446
Superfund Policy Forum Update, Volume 1,
Number 1, February 1992.
See 0324
Superfund Program and Information Man-
agement Update. Volume 1, Number 1, No-
vember 1993.
See 0123
Superfund Program Implementation Manual,
Fiscal Year 1994. Volume 1. Program Goals
and Planning Requirements. Volume 2. Pro-
gram Implementation Procedures.
See 0124
-------
SUBJECT INDEX
SUPERFUND
Superfund Program: Ten Years of Progress.
See 0977
Superfund Progress - Aficionado's Version
(Progress as of March 31,1992).
See 0326
Superfund Progress. Aficionado's Version.
Progress as of September 30,1992.
See 0327
Superfund Progress: Fall/Winter 1992.
See 0328
Superfund Progress, Spring 1992.
See 0329
Superfund Progress, Summer 1992.
See 0330
Superfund: Qualified Disadvantaged Busi-
ness Utilization in State Response.
See 0498
Superfund Reauthorization: NACEPT Sub-
committee Handbook.
See 0331
Superfund Reform Act of 1994.
See 0332
Superfund Remedial Action Decision Proc-
ess: Database for Selected FY87 Records of
Decision.
See 1136
Superfund Remedial Program Financial Man-
agement Authority, Responsibilities and Pro-
cedures.
See 1137
Superfund Removal Procedures: Action
Memorandum Guidance.
See 1012
Superfund Removal Procedures: Guidance
on the Consideration of ARARS during Re-
moval Actions.
See 1013
Superfund Removal Procedures: Public Par-
ticipation Guidance for On-Scene Coordina-
tors: Community Relations and the Adminis-
trative Record.
See 1014
Superfund Removal Procedures: Removal
Enforcement Guidance for On-Scene Coordi-
nators.
See 1015
Superfund: Report of the EPA Superfund
Revitalization Public Meeting Held on June
24,1992. Volumes 1 and 2.
See 0333
Superfund Response Action Contracts.
See 0074
Superfund Responsiveness Summaries (Su-
perfund Management Review: Recommen-
dation Number 43E).
See 0125
Superfund Revitalization: Measures of Sue-
See 0334
Superfund Strategic Plan and Implementa-
tion Strategy Fiscal Year 1994.
See 0126
Superfund Strategic Plan and Implementa-
tion Strategy Fiscal Year 1994: Office and
Division Plans.
See 0127
Superfund Technical Assistance Grant
(TAG) Handbook.
See 0499
Superfund Technical Assistance Grant
(TAG) Handbook: Applying for Your Grant.
See 0500
Superfund Technical Assistance ' Grant
(TAG) Handbook: The Application Forms
with Instructions.
See 0501
Superfund Technical Assistance Grants.
See 0502
Superfund Technical Assistance Grants
(Fact Sheet).
See 0503
Superfund Technical Assistance Grants
(TAGs) (Pamphlet).
See 0505
Supplemental Guidance on Federal Super-
fund Liens.
See 0885
Supplemental Guidance on Performing Risk
Assessments in Remedial Investigation/Fea-
sibility Studies (RI/FSs). Conducted by Po-
tentially Responsible Parties (PRPs).
See 1078
Supplemental Guidance to RAGS: Calculat-
ing the Concentration Term. Volume 1,
Number 1, May 1992.
See 1079
Supplemental Guide to Video on Superfund
Site Assessment Screening: A National Pri-
ority.
See 0394
Supporting State Attorneys General
CERCLA Remedial and Enforcement Activi-
ties at NPL Sites.
See 0506
Tech Trends Number 3, December 1990.
See 1325
Tech Trends Number 4, March 1991.
See 1326
Tech Trends Number 5, May 1991.
See 1327
Tech Trends Number 9, June 1992.
See 1329
Tech Trends (Number 10).
See 1330
Tech Trends (Number 11).
See 1331
Tech Trends: The Applied Technologies
Journal for Superfund Removals and Reme-
dial Actions and RCRA Corrective Actions,
December 1993.
See 1332
Tech Trends: The Applied Technologies
Journal for Superfund Removals and Reme-
dial Actions and RCRA Corrective Actions.
May 1993.
See 1333
Technical Assistance Team (TAT) Contracts
Users' Manual.
See 0075
Technical Background Document for Draft
Soil Screening Level Guidance.
See 1537
Technical Guidance Document: Construction
Quality Management for Remedial Action
and Remedial Design Waste' Containment
Systems.
See 1334
Technical Support Services for Superfund
Site Remediation. Second Edition.
See 1335
Technology Demonstration Summary: Bio
Trol Soil Washing System for Treatment of a
Wood Preserving Site.
See 1538
Technology Demonstration Summary,
DuPont/Oberlin Microfiltration System, Pal-
merton, Pennsylvania. April-May 1992.
See 1336
Technology Evaluation Report: Biotrol Soil
Washing System for Treatment of a Wood
Preserving Site. Volume 1.
See 1539
Technology Evaluation Report: Biotrol Soil
Washing System for Treatment of a Wood
Preserving Site. Volume 2, Part A.
See 1540
Technology Evaluation Report: Biotrol Soil
Washing System for Treatment of a Wood
Preserving Site. Volume 2, Part B.
See 1541
Technology Evaluation Report CHEMFIX
Technologies, Inc., Solidification/Stabiliza-
tion Process, Clackamas, Oregon. Volume 2.
See 1339
Technology Evaluation Report:, Chemfix
Technologies, Inc. Solidification/Stabilization
Process, Clackamas, Oregon. Volume 1.
See 1566
Technology Evaluation Report: International
Waste Technologies/Geo-Con In situ Stabili-
zation/Solidification. Volume 3. Update
Report.
See 1567
Technology Evaluation Report of Retech's
Plasma Centrifugal Furnace. Volume 1.
See 1342
Technology Evaluation Report of Retech's
Plasma Centrifugal Furnace. Volume 2.
See 1343
Technology Evaluation Report: Ogden Circu-
lating Bed Combustor at the McColl Super-
fund Site.
See 1344
Technology Evaluation Report: Pilot-Scale
Demonstration of a Slurry-Phase Biological
Reactor for Creosote-Contaminated Soil.
Volume 1.
See 1542
Technology Evaluation Report: SITE Pro-
gram Demonstration. EPA RREL's Mobile
Volume Reduction Unit.
See 1348
Technology Evaluation Report: Site Program
Demonstration of a Trial Excavation at the
McColl Superfund Site.
See 1349
Technology Evaluation Report: SITE Pro-
gram Demonstration of the DuPont/Oberlin
Microfiltration Technology.
See 1350
Technology Evaluation Report: SITE Pro-
gram Demonstration Test Horsehead Re-
source Development Company, Inc., Flame
Reactor Technology, Monaca, Pennsylvania.
See 1353
Technology Evaluation Report. SITE Pro-
gram Demonstration, Resources Conserva-
tion Company, Basic Extractive Sludge
Treatment (B.E.S.T. (Trade Name)), Grand
Calumet River, Gary, Indiana. Volume 1.
See 1593
Technology Evaluation Report. SITE Pro-
gram Demonstration, Resources Conserva-
tion Company, Basic Extractive Sludge
Treatment (B.E.S.T. (Trade Name)), Grand
Calumet River, Gary, Indiana. Volume 2. Part
1.
See 1594
Technology Evaluation Report. SITE Pro-
gram Demonstration, Resources Conserva-
tion Company, Basic Extractive Sludge
Treatment (B.E.S.T. (Trade Name)), Grant
Calumet River, Gary, Indiana. Volume 2. Part
2.
See 1595
Technology Evaluation Report. SITE Pro-
gram Demonstration, Resources Conserva-
tion Company, Basic Extractive Sludge
Treatment (B.E.S.T. (Trade Name)), Grand
Calumet River, Gary, Indiana. Volume 2. Part
3.
See 1596
Technology Selection Guide for Wood Treat-
er Sites.
See 1122
Thermal Desorption Treatment (February
1994).
See 1487
SU-101
-------
SUf ERFUND ACCELERATED CLEANUP MODEL SUBJECT INDEX
Tlmoly Initiation of Responsible Party
Soafcbes, Issuance of Notice Letters, and
RelMM of Information (Attachment XXII).
Toronto Harbour Commissioners (THC) Soil
I .Recycle treatment Train. Applications Analy-
ijajs Report
';€•• 1544
Total Quality Management (TQM) and Qual-
i tty Assurance (QA) in Superfund.
3090996
'Tbxte Treatments 'In-situ' Steam/Hot-Air
Stripping Technology, Applications Analysis
Report.
See 1545
Toxfcologteal Assessment of Hazardous
: Wastes.
SCO 1358
Toxicologtcal Profile for
B«nzo(b}Flooranthene.
Sa«1360
transmittal of Guidance on Use and En-
;_fOfC8mflnt of CERCLA.Mprmation Requests
I and .AdrnWstrativi Subpoenas.
See 0887
Transmittal of Model Consent Decree for
CERCLA Section 104(e) Information Re-
quest Enforcement Actons.
•See 0888 .....................
Transmittal of the Rnal Waste Oil Interim
Enforcement Outdance Document.
See 0889
Treatability Studtes Contractor Work Assign-
ments.
§«e 0076
fffeataWty Studtes Under CERCLA: An
Overview.
Se«1172
U.S. Bureau of Reclamation Assistance to
the Superfund Program.
Soa 1138
Ultrox International Ultraviolet Radiation/Oxi-
dation Technology: Applications Analysis
Report.
SC91364
Undorstanding Superfund Risk Assessment.
See 0508
Unitod States Environmental Protection
Agency Model CERCLA RD/RA Consent
Decree.
""§900890
Update No. 2 to 'Procedures for Completion
arid Dotation of NPL Sites'.
S«(I 0395
Update on Implementation of the Oil Pollu-
tion Act of 1990. Volume 1, Number 1, Feb-
ruary 1991.
See 0936
Update on Implementation of the Oil Pollu-
tion Act of 1990. Volume 1, Number 2, April
1991.
.SM.0937
Update on Implementation of the Oil Pollu-
tion Act of 1990. Volume 1, Number 3, June
1991.
Sou 0938
USACe Preptaced and Rapid Response
Contracts.
Sea 1139
Use of a Fourier Transform Spectrometer as
a Remote Sensor at Superfund Sites.
Seo 1365
Uso of CERCLA Section 106 Unilateral En-
forcement for Remedial Design and Remedi-
al Action: Strategy for Fiscal Year 1990.
Soo 0891
:P«e of IRIS Values In Superfund Risk As-
sessment.
Soo 1081
SU-102
Use of Office of Research and Develop-
ment's Bioremediation Expertise in Super-
fund Removal Program.
See 1016
Use of Removal Approaches to Speed Up
Remedial Action Projects.
See 1140
Use of Time and Materials and Cost Reim-
bursement Subcontracts for Remedial Ac-
tions under the Alternative Remedial Con-
tracting Strategy Contracts.
See 1141
USEPA Contract Laboratory Program Nation-
al Functional Guidelines for Organic Data
Review.
See 0077
USEPA Contract Laboratory Program Nation-
al Functional Guidelines for Inorganic Data
Review.
See 0997
User's Guide to the Contract Laboratory Pro-
gram.
See 0079
User's Guide to the Contract Laboratory Pro-
gram.
See 0080
Using State and Local Officials to Assist in
Community Relations (Superfund Manage-
ment Review: Recommendation No. 43.K.L).
See 0128
Vendor Information Form to be Completed
for Participation in the: Vendor Information
System for Innovative Treatment Technol-
ogies (VISITT).
See 1369
Waiver of Headquarters Approval for Issu-
ance of RD/RA Special Notice Letters at the
Time of ROD Signature from OERR and
OWPE.
See 0893
Written Demand for CERCLA Cost Recov-
ery.
See 0894
Written Demand for Recovery of Costs In-
curred Under the Comprehensive Environ-
mental Response, Compensation, and Liabil-
ity Act (CERCLA).
See 0895
SUPERFUND ACCELERATED CLEANUP
MODEL
Assessing Sites under SACM: interim Guid-
ance. Volume 1, Number 4, Deccember
1992.
See 0084
Early Action and Long-Term Action under
SACM: Interim Guidance, Volume 1, Number
2, December 1992.
See 0089
Enforcement under SACM: Interim Guid-
ance. Volume 1, Number 3, December 1992.
See 0090
Exercising Flexibility through the Superfund
Accelerated Cleanup Model (SACM).
See 0091
Guidance on Implementation of the Super-
fund Accelerated Cleanup Model (SACM)
under CERCLA and the NCP.
See 0094
Regional Pilots and Applications of Super-
fund Accelerated Cleanup Model (SACM).
See 0110
SACM Regional Decision Teams: Interim
Guidance. Volume 1, Number 5, December
1992.
See 0111
Smart Moves in Superfund - Regional Pilots
and Initiatives. Volume 1, Number 2, Sep-
tember 1992.
See 0306
Status of Key SACM Program Management
Issues: Interim Guidance, Volume 1, Number
1, December 1992.
See 0113
Superfund Accelerated Cleanup Bulletin:
Presumptive Remedies for Municipal Landfill
Sites. Volume 2, Number 1, February 1993.
See 0115
Superfund Accelerated Cleanup Model
(SACM). Volume 1, Number 4, November
1992.
See 0122
SUPERFUND ACCELERATED CLEANUP
MODEL (SACM)
HSED SACM Report. Volume 1, Number 1,
January 1993.
See 0096
SUPERFUND AMENDMENTS AND
REAUTHORIZATION ACT
Covenants Not to Sue under SARA.
See 0526
SUPERFUND AMENDMENTS AND
REAUTHORIZATION ACT (SARA)
Inorganic Contract Compliance Screening
System (ICCSS) Software (for Microcomput-
ers).
See 0034
Inorganic Contract Compliance Screening
System (ICCSS) Software for the PC (Ver-
sion 3/90) User Manual.
See 0035
Organic Contract Compliance Screening
System (OCCSS) Software (for Microcom-
puters).
See 0047
Organic Contract Compliance Screening
System (OCCSS) Software for the PC (Ver-
sion 2/90) User Manual.
See 0048
SUPERFUND COMPREHENSIVE
ACCOMPLISHMENTS PLAN
Amendment to Historical Definitions of NPL
Deletion Start and Completion Dates.
See 0335
SUPERFUND DATA BASE
Hazardous Waste Superfund Collection: Da-
tabase Thesaurus.
See 0138
SUPERFUND DOCKET AND INFORMATION
CENTER
Superfund Docket Operations Manual for
Rulemaking Activities.
See 0081
SUPERFUND INNOVATIVE TECHNOLOGY
EVALUATION
Accutech Pneumatic Fracturing Extraction
and Hot Gas Injection, Phase 1. Applications
Analysis Report.
See 1190
Demonstration of Hazardous Waste Site
Treatment Technologies.
See 1227
Description of EPA SITE Demonstration of
the HAZCON Stabilization Process at the
Douglassville, Pennsylvania Superfund Site.
See 1552
SITE Demonstration of the CHEMFIX Solidi-
fication/Stabilization Process at the Portable
Equipment Salvage Company Site.
See 1559
Superfund Innovative Technology Evaluation
(SITE): Demonstration Bulletin. Flame Reac-
tor, Horsehead Resource Development
Company, Inc.
See 1319
-------
SUBJECT INDEX
SUPERFUND PROJECT
Technology Evaluation Report: Baboock and
Wilcox Cyclone Furnace Vitrification Tech-
nology. Volume 1.
See 1337
Technology Evaluation Report: Babcock and
Wilcox Cyclone Furnace Vitrification Tech-
nology. Volume 2.
See 1338
Technology Evaluation Report: SITE Pro-
gram. CF Systems Organics Extraction
System, New Bedford, Massachusetts.
Volume 1.
See 1346
Technology Evaluation Report: SITE Pro-
gram. CF Systems Organics Extraction
System, New Bedford, Massachusetts.
Volume 2.
See 1347
SUPERFUND INNOVATIVE TECHNOLOGY
EVALUATION PROGRAM
Babcock and Wilcox Cyclone Furnace Vitrifi-
cation. Technology Demonstration Summary.
See 1203
Chemfix Technologies, Inc. Solidification/
Stabilization Process. Application Analysis
Report.
See 1551
Demonstration of Waste Treatment Technol-
ogies.
See 1229
Horsehead Resource Development Compa-
ny, Inc. Flame Reactor Technology: Applica-
tions Analysis Report.
See 1263
Horsehead Resource Development Compa-
ny, Inc., Flame Reactor Technology. Tech-
nology Demonstration Summary.
See 1264
Control Technology: Estimating Innovative
Technology Costs for the SITE Program.
See 1222
Control Technology: 1992 Update of U.S.
EPA's Superfund Innovative Technology
Evaluation (SITE) Emerging Technology Pro-
gram.
See 1223
Demonstration Projects Under the U.S. EPA
Superfund Innovative Technology Evaluation
Program.
See 1230
EPA Site Demonstration of BioTrol Aqueous
Treatment System.
See 1441
EPA SITE Demonstration of the Horsehead
Resource Development Company Flame Re-
actor Technology.
See 1242
EPA SITE Demonstration of the International
Waste Technologies/Geo-Con In situ Stabili-
zation/Solidification Process.
See 1553
EPA Site Demonstration of the Terra Vac In
situ Vacuum Extraction Process in Grove-
land, Massachusetts. (Site Program Update:
Part VII).
See 1243
SITE Demonstration of the American Com-
bustion Pyretron Oxygen-Enhanced Burner.
See 1299
SlTE-Emerging Technologies: Laser Induced
Photochemical Oxidative Destruction of
Toxic Organics in Leachates and Ground-
waters.
See 1591
SITE Emerging Technologies Project: Bab-
cock and Wilcox Cyclone Vitrification.
See 1303
Superfund Innovative Technology Evaluation
Program: Progress and Accomplishments,
Fiscal Year 1989. A Third Report to Con-
gress.
See 1311
Superfund Innovative Technology Evaluation
Program: Progress and Accomplishments,
Fiscal Year 1990. A Fourth Report to Con-
gress.
See 1312
Superfund Innovative Technology Evaluation
Program: Progress and Accomplishments
Fiscal Year 1991. A 5th Report to Congress.
See 1313
Superfund Innovative Technology Evaluation
Program: Technology Profiles, Fifth Edition.
See 1315
Superfund Innovative Technology Evaluation
Program: Technology Profiles, Fourth Edi-
tion.
See 1316
Superfund Innovative Technology Evaluation
Program: Technology Profiles, November
1989.
See 1317
Technology Evaluation Report: SITE Pro-
gram Demonstration of the Ultrox Interna-
tional Ultraviolet Radiation/Oxidation Tech-
nology.
See 1351
Technology Evaluation Report: SITE Pro-
gram Demonstration Test, Soliditech, Inc.,
Solidification/Stabilization Process. Volume
1.
See 1570
Technology Evaluation Report: SITE Pro-
gram Demonstration Test, Soliditech, Inc.
Solidification/Stabilization Process. Volume
2.
See 1571
SUPERFUND INNOVATIVE TECHNOLOGY
EVALUATION PROGRAM (SITE)
Superfund Innovative Technology Evaluation
Program Demonstration Plan for Westing-
house Bio-Analytic Systems Pentachloro-
phenol Immunoassays.
See 1310
SUPERFUND PROGRAM
Achieving Greater Consistency between
Subjective and Objective Risks.
See 1017
Air/Superfund National Technical Guidance
Series. Superfund Air Pathway Analyses
Review Criteria Checklists.
See 1372
Air/Superfund National Technical Guidance
Study Series. Comparisons of Air Stripper
Simulations and Field Performance Data.
See 1376
American Combustion Pyretron Destruction
System. Applications Analysis Report.
See 1193
ARCS (Alternative Remedial Contract Strate-
gy) Contracts Users' Manual.
See 0019
Assessment of International Technologies
for Superfund Applications: Technology
Review and Trip Report Results.
See 1197
Assessment of Technologies for the Reme-
diation of Radioactively Contaminated Su-
perfund Sites.
See 1198
Community Relations during Enforcement
Activities and Development of the Adminis-
trative Record.
See 0465
Guidelines for Effective Management of the
Contract Laboratory Program. Part 1. Con-
tract Award. Part 2. Contract Administration.
See 0028
Health Effects Assessment Summary
Tables.
See 1051
Health Effects Assessment Summary
. Tables.
See 1052
Health Effects Assessment Summary
Tables.
See 1053
Health Effects Assessment Summary Tables
Fourth Quarter FY 1989.
See 1054
Identification of SARA (Superfund Amend-
ments and Reauthorization Act) Compounds
in Adipose Tissue.
See 1055
In-situ Stabilization/Solidification of PCS
(Polychlorinated BiphenylsJ-Contaminated
Soil.
See 1556
Management Review of the Superfund Pro-
gram.
See 0101
Management Review of the Superfund Pro-
gram: Implementation Plan.
See 0102
Evaluation of Modifications to Extraction Pro-
cedures Used in Analysis of Environmental
Samples from Superfund Sites.
See 1247
Review and Evaluation of Area Source Dis-
persion Algorithms for Emission Sources at
Superfund Sites.
See 1416
Risk Assessment Guidance for Superfund.
Volume 1. Human Health Evaluation Manual.
Part A.
See 1065
Risk Assessment Guidance for Superfund.
Volume 2. Environmental Evaluation Manual.
See 1072
Superfund Emergency Response Actions: A
Summary of Federally-Funded Removals.
Volume 1.
See 0316
Superfund Emergency Response Actions: A
Summary of Federally-Funded Removals.
Volume 2.
See 0317
Superfund Emergency Response Actions: A
Summary of Federally Funded Removals.
Volume 3.
See 0318
Superfund Ground Water Issue: Accuracy of
Depth to Water Measurements. 2nd in
Series of Issue Papers.
See 1476
Superfund Technical Assistance Grants Pro-
gram: Regional Guidance Manual.
See 0504
Terra Vac In situ Vacuum Extraction System:
Applications Analysis Report.
See 1355
Terra Vac In situ Vacuum Extraction System:
Applications Analysis Report.
See 1356
Toxicity Bioassay and Eluate Heavy Metals
Analysis Results of the Bench Scale Stabili-
zation Study of Soils from the United
Chrome Superfund NPL (National Priority
List) Site Corvallis, Oregon.
See 1546
User's Guide to Contract Laboratory Pro-
gram.
See 0078
SUPERFUND PROJECT
Technology Evaluation Report SITE Program
Demonstration Test, HAZCON Solidification,
Douglassville, Pennsylvania. Volume 1.
See 1569
SU-103
-------
SUPERFUND SITE
SUPERFUND SITE
Hydfogeotogy and Results of Aquifer Tests
Jo the Vicinity of a Hazardous-Waste Dispos-
al Sita Near Byron, Illinois.
Sea 1463
SUPERFUND SITES
Evaluation of Personal Cooling Devices for
Dioxin C!oan-Up Operation.
,S
-------
SUBJECT INDEX
TOXIC SUBSTANCES
National Priorities List Sites: Tennessee,
1992.
See 0271
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Tennessee.
See 0796
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Tennessee.
See 0797
, Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Tennessee.
See 0798
TENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS
Assessment of Tentatively Identified Com-
pounds in Superfund Samples.
See 1199
TERMINOLOGY
Hazardous Waste Superfund Collection: Da-
tabase Thesaurus.
See 0138
TERRA VAC IN SITU VACUUM EXTRACTION
SYSTEMS
Terra Vac In situ Vacuum Extraction System:
Applications Analysis Report.
See 1356
TERRA VAC SYSTEM
EPA Site Demonstration of the Terra Vac In
situ Vacuum Extraction Process in Grove-
land, Massachusetts. (Site Program Update:
Part VII).
See 1243
TERRESTRIAL ECOSYSTEMS
Evaluation of Terrestrial Indicators for Use in
,i. Ecological Assessments at Hazardous
Waste Sites.
See 1249
TEST CHAMBERS
Operations and Research at the U.S. EPA
Incineration Research Facility: Annual
Report for FY89.
See 1482
TEST FACILITIES
Risk Reduction Engineering Laboratory Site
Remediation Technical Support Program:
FY92 Annual Report.
See 1296
TESTS
Compendium of ERT Toxicity Testing Proce-
dures.
See 0906
TETRACHLOROETHYLENE
Health Effects Assessment for Tetrachlor-
oethylene.
See 1047
TEXAS
Estimating VOC Emissions from Superfund
Sites in the Houston-Galveston Texas Area.
(NNEMS Project No. 1302).
See 1406
National Priorities List Sites: Texas.
See 0272
National Priorities List Sites: Texas.
' See 0273
National Priorities List Sites: Texas, 1992.
See 0274
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Texas.
See 0799
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Texas.
See 0800
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Texas.
See 0801
Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Clean-
up Efforts Nationwide, Spring 1993 (French
Limited Site Profile, Harris County, Texas).
See 0954
THERMAL DEGRADATION
On-Site Engineering Report for the Low-
Temperature Thermal Desorption Pilot-Scale
Test on Contaminated Soil.
See 1519
THERMAL DESORPTION
Estimation of Air Impacts for Thermal De-
sorption Units Used at Superfund Sites. Air/
Superfund National Technical Guidance
Study Series.
See 1409
Guide for Conducting Treatability Studies
under CERCLA: Thermal Desorption
Remedy Selection. Interim Guidance.
See 1170
Tech Trends: The Applied Technologies
Journal for Superfund Removals and Reme-
dial Actions and RCRA Corrective Actions.
May 1993.
See 1333
Thermal Desorption Treatment (February
1994).
See 1487
THERMAL ENVIRONMENTS
Removal of Creosote from Soil by Thermal
Desorption.
See 1530
Thermal Desorption Treatment.
See 1357
THERMAL REACTORS
Horsehead Resource Development Compa-
ny, Inc. Flame Reactor Technology: Applica-
tions Analysis Report.
See 1263
EPA SITE Demonstration of the Horsehead
Resource Development Company Flame Re-
actor Technology.
See 1242
Superfund Innovative Technology Evaluation
(SITE): Demonstration Bulletin. Flame Reac-
tor, Horsehead Resource Development
Company, Inc.
See 1319
THERMAL RECOVERY METHODS
EPA SITE Demonstration of the Horsehead
Resource Development Company Flame Re-
actor Technology.
See 1242
THESAURI
Hazardous Waste Superfund Collection: Da-
tabase Thesaurus.
See 0138
TORONTO (CANADA)
Technology Evaluation Report Toronto Har-
bour Commissioners (THC) Soil Recycle
Treatment Train.
See 1543
TOXIC HAZARDS
Dealing with Toxic Polluted Sediments in the
Great Lakes Basin.
See 1582
TOXIC SUBSTANCES
Air/Superfund National Technical Guidance
Study Series: Estimation of Air Impacts for
Air Stripping of Contaminated Water.
See 1382
Air Superfund National Technical Guidance
Study Series. Estimation of Air Impacts for
the Excavation of Contaminated Soil.
See 1384
Air/Superfund National Technical Guidance
Study Series. Guideline for Predictive Base-
line Emissions Estimation Procedures for Su-
perfund Sites.
See 1387
Air Superfund National Technical. Guidance
Study Series. Screening Procedures for Esti-
mating the Air Impacts of Incineration at Su-
perfund Sites.
See 1389
CERCLA Compliance with the RCRA Toxici-
ty Characteristics (TG) Rule: Part 2.
See 0412
Ecosystem Effects of Superfund. National
Priority List Sites in Industrial Landscapes: A
Framework for Policy Decisions.
See 0135
Engineering Bulletin: Air Pathway Analysis.
See 1404
Guidance for Coordinating ATSDR Health
Assessment Activities with the Superfund
Remedial Process.
See 1029
Guidelines for the Cleanup of Clandestine
Drug Laboratories.
See 1007
Health and Safety Audit Guidelines: SARA
Title I, Section 126.
See 0916
Health Effects Assessment for Benzene.
See 1035
Health Effects Assessment for Cadmium.
See 1036
Health Effects Assessment for Carbon Tet-
rachloride.
See 1037
Health Effects Assessment for Chlordane.
See 1038
Health Effects Assessment for Chloroben-
zene.
See 1039
Health Effects Assessment for Chloroform.
See 1040
Health Effects Assessment for DDT.
See 1041
Health Effects Assessment for Methyl Ethyl
Ketone.
See 1042
Health Effects Assessment for Methylene
Chloride.
See 1043
Health Effects Assessment for Naphthalene.
See 1044
Health Effects Assessment for Phenol.
See 1045
Health Effects Assessment for Styrene.
See 1046
Health Effects Assessment for Tetrachlor-
oethylene.
See 1047
Health Effects Assessment for Trichloroethy-
lene.
See 1048
Health Effects Assessment for Xylenes.
See 1049
Health Effects Assessment for 2,4,5-Trichlor-
ophenoxy Acetic Acid (2,4,5-T).
See 1050
Notification of Hazardous Waste Sites Re-
quired Under Section 103(c) of the Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compen-
sation and Liability Act (CERCLA) of 1980:
EPA Region 1.
See 1174
Notification of Hazardous Waste Sites Re-
quired Under Section 103(c) of the Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compen-
sation and Liability Act (CERCLA) of 1980:
EPA Region 2.
See 1175
SU-105
-------
TOXICITY
SUBJECT INDEX
, Notification of Hazardous Waste Sites Re-
quired Under Section 103(c) of the Compre-
i hensive Environmental Response, Compen-
j satlon and liabipty Act (CERCLA) of 1980:
EPARegton'3. ......
See 1176
j .Notification of Hazardous Waste Sites Re-
quired Under Section 103{c) of the Compre-
. .hensive Envjrqnmental Response, Compen-
sation and liability Act (CERCLA) of 1980:
EPA Region 4.
See 1177
Notification of Hazardous Waste Sites Re-
quired Under Section 103(c) of the Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compen-
sation and liability Act (CERCLA) of 1980:
EPA Region 5.
See 1178
Notification of Hazardous Waste Sites Re-
quired Under Section I03(c) of the Compre-
: hensive Environmental Response, Compen-
sation and Liability Act (CERCLA) of 1980:
EPA Region 6.
Sea 1179
Notification of Hazardous Waste Sites Re-
quired Under Section 103(o) of the Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compen-
sation and Liability Act (CERCLA) of 1980:
EPA Region 7.
...... Notification of Hazardous Waste Sites Re-
quired Under Section l'03(c) of the cbmpre-
........ nerwive environmental Response, Compen-
sation and Liability Act (CERCLA) of 1980:
EPA Region 8.
...........
.......... Notification of Hazardous Waste Sites Re-
quired Under Section 103(c) of the Compre-
• hensivo Environmental Response, Compen-
sation and Liability Act (CERCLA) of 1980:
EPA Region 9.
Soo1182
Notification of Hazardous Waste Sites Re-
quired Under Section 103(c) of the Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compen-
sation and liability Act (CERCLA) of 1980:
EPA Region 10.
See 1183
OvervlQW of Selected EPA (Environmental
Protection | Agency) Regulations and Guid-
:i*nca Affecting POTW (Publicly Owned
Treatment Works) Management.
Sao 0432
SARA (Supertax) Amendments and Reau-
tttorization Act) Section 313 Roadmaps Data
Bas«. User's Manual. Version 2.10.
S«e 0304
Twdcotogtcal Implementations of Remediat-
ing Hazardous Wastes.
See 1359
Tracking Toxic Substances at Industrial Fa-
cilities; Engineering Mass Balance versus
Materials Accounting.
See 1362
Updated Health Effects Assessment for Ace-
tone. ..............................
Sea 1080
TOXICITY
ARAR's Q's and A's. Compliance with the
Toxiclty Characteristics Rule. Part 1.
See 0396
Compendium of ERT Toxiclty Testing Proce-
dures,'
See 0906
Evaluation of Exposure Markers.
See 1246
Quantifying Effects in Ecological Site As-
sessments: Biological and Statistical Consid-
erations.
Sea 1063
Acid Volatile Sulfide Predicts the Acute Tox-
icity of Cadmium and Nickel in Sediments.
See 1572
Application of a Plant Test System in the
Identification of Potential Genetic Hazards at
Chemical Waste Sites.
See 1194
Use of 'Selenastrum capricornutum' to
Assess the Toxicity Potential of Surface and
Ground Water Contamination Caused by
Chromium Waste.
See 1367
Risk Assessment Guidance for Superfund.
Volume 1. Human Health Evaluation Manual
(Part B).
See 1067
Risk Assessment Guidance for Superfund.
Volume 1. Human Health Evaluation Manual
(Part C).
See 1069
Toxicity Bioassay and Eluate Heavy Metals
Analysis Results of the Bench Scale Stabili-
zation Study of Soils from the United
Chrome Superfund NPL (National Priority
List) Site Corvallis, Oregon.
See 1546
Toxicological Assessment of Hazardous
Wastes.
See 1358
Toxicological Profile for
Benzo(b)Fluoranthene.
See 1360
TOXICOLOGY
Health Effects Assessment for Benzene.
See 1035
Health Effects Assessment for Cadmium.
See 1036
Health Effects Assessment for Carbon Tet-
rachloride.
See 1037
Health Effects Assessment for Chlordane.
See 1038
Health Effects Assessment for Chloroben-
zene.
See 1039
Health Effects Assessment for Chloroform.
See 1040
Health Effects Assessment for DDT.
See 1041
Health Effects Assessment for Methyl Ethyl
Ketone.
See 1042
Health Effects Assessment for Methylene
Chloride.
See 1043
Health Effects Assessment for Naphthalene.
See 1044
Health Effects Assessment for Phenol.
See 1045
Health Effects Assessment for Styrene.
See 1046
Health Effects Assessment for Tetrachlor-
oethylene.
See 1047
Health Effects Assessment for Trichloroethy-
lene.
See 1048
Health Effects Assessment for Xylenes.
See 1049
Health Effects Assessment for 2,4,5-Trichlor-
ophenoxy Acetic Acid (2,4,5-T).
See 1050
Risk Assessment Guidance for Superfund.
Volume 1. Human Health Evaluation Manual.
Part A.
See 1065
Toxicological Implementations of Remediat-
ing Hazardous Wastes.
See 1359
Toxicological Profile for Trichloroethylene.
See 1361
Updated Health Effects Assessment for Ace-
tone.
See 1080
Use of IRIS Values in Superfund Risk As-
sessment.
See 1081
TRACKING
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
National PRP Listing Alphabetically by PRP
Name.
See 0616
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 1.
See 0739
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 2.
See 0744
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 4.
See 0753
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 5.
See 0758
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 6.
See 0763
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 7.
See 0768
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 8.
See 0773
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 10.
See 0783
TRAINING
OSWER Source Book: Training and Tech-
nology Transfer Resources.
See 1283
OSWER Source Book. Volume 1. Training
and Technology Transfer Resources, 1992-
1993.
See 1284
OSWER Source Book. Volume 2. Training
and Technology Transfer Resources, 1992-
1993.
See 1285
Required Contracts Management Training
for Regional Superfund Personnel.
See 0065
TRAINING DEVICES
Superfund Progress: Fall/Winter 1992.
See 0328
TREATABILITY VARIANCE
Superfund LDR Guide No. 6A (2nd Edition)
Obtaining a Soil and Debris Treatability Vari-
ance for Remedial Actions.
See 0445
TREATMENT INNOVATION
Tech Trends: The Applied Technologies
Journal for Superfund Removals and Reme-
dial Actions and RCRA Corrective Actions,
December 1993.
See 1332
TRENDS
Tech Trends Number 3, December 1990.
See 1325
Tech Trends Number 4, March 1991.
See 1326
Tech Trends Number 5, May 1991.
See 1327
Tech Trends Number 9, June 1992.
See 1329
Tech Trends (Number 11).
See 1331
SU-106
-------
SUBJECT INDEX
USEPA REGION 8
TRIAL BURN
Potential Surrogate Metals for Incinerator
Trial Burns.
See 1486
TRICHLOROETHYLENE
Health Effects Assessment for Trichloroethy-
lene.
See 1048
Accutech Pneumatic Fracturing Extraction
and Hot Gas Injection, Phase 1. Applications
Analysis Report.
See 1190
Toxicological Profile for Trichloroethylene.
See 1361
TRUST TERRITORIES
National Priorities List Sites: The United
States Territories, 1992.
See 0275
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Trust Territories.
See 0803
TRUST TERRITORY OF THE PACIFIC
ISLANDS
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Trust Territories.
See 0802
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Trust Territories.
See 0803
' Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Trust Territories.
See 0804
TTUSA PROCESS
Toxic Treatments 'In-situ' Steam/Hot-Air
Stripping Technology. Applications Analysis
Report.
See 1545
ULTRAVIOLET RADIATION
Field Demonstration of the UV/Oxidation
Technology to Treat Ground Water Contami-
nated with VOCs.
See 1452
Technology Evaluation Report: SITE Pro-
gram Demonstration of the Ultrox Interna-
tional Ultraviolet Radiation/Oxidation Tech-
nology.
See 1351
ULTROX SYSTEM
Field Demonstration of the UV/Oxidation
Technology to Treat Ground Water Contami-
nated with VOCs.
See 1452
ULTROX TECHNOLOGY
Ultrox International Ultraviolet Radiation/Oxi-
dation Technology: Applications Analysis
Report.
See 1364
ULTROX TREATMENT
Technology Evaluation Report: SITE Pro-
gram Demonstration of the Ultrox Interna-
tional Ultraviolet Radiation/Oxidation Tech-
nology.
See 1351
UNITED STATES
CERCLIS Characterization Project: National
Results.
See 0001
Evaluation of Ground-Water Extraction Rem-
edies. Volume 2. Case Studies 1-19.
See 1446
NPL Characterization Project: National Re-
sults.
See 0355
US EPA
EPA/ORD (Environmental Protection
Agency/Office of Research and Develop-
ment) Role and Perspective in Sediment Re-
search.
See 1585
Ground-Water Issue: Soil sampling and anal-
ysis for volatile organic compounds.
See 1507
Guidance on Site Assessment Cooperative
Agreements.
See 0475
Operations and Research at the U.S. EPA
Incineration Research Facility: Annual
Report for FY89.
See 1482
Future of Expert Systems in the Environmen-
tal Protection Agency.
See 1257
Risk Reduction Engineering Laboratory Site
Remediation Technical Support Program:
FY92 Annual Report.
See 1296
Superfund Program: Ten Years of Progress.
See 0977
Superfund Response Action Contracts.
See 0074
Using State and Local Officials to Assist in
Community Relations {Superfund Manage-
ment Review: Recommendation No. 43.K.L).
See 0128
US EPA REGION
NPL Characterization Project: Region 8 Re-
sults.
See 0362
US EPA REGION 1
NPL Characterization Project: Region 1 Re-
sults.
See 0356
US EPA REGION 1-10
NPL Characterization Project: National Re-
sults.
See 0355
US EPA REGION 10
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 10, January
22, 1992.
See 0785
US EPA REGION 2
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 2, January
22, 1992.
See 0746
US EPA REGION 3
NPL Characterization Project: Region 3 Re-
sults.
See 0357
US EPA REGION 4
NPL Characterization Project: Region 4 Re-
sults.
See 0358
US EPA REGION 5
CERCLIS Characterization Project Region 5
Results.
See 0006
NPL Characterization Project: Region 5 Re-
sults.
See 0359
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 5, January
22, 1992.
See 0760
US EPA REGION 6
CERCLIS Characterization Project: Region 6
Results.
See 0007
NPL Characterization Project: Region 6 Re-
sults.
See 0360
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 6, January
22, 1992.
See 0765
US EPA REGION 7
CERCLIS Characterization Project: Region 7
Results.
See 0008
NPL Characterization Project: Region 7 Re-
sults.
See 0361
US EPA REGION 9
NPL Characterization Project: Region 9 Re-
sults.
See 0363
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 9, January
22,1992.
See 0780
US EPA REGIONS
Regional Quality Control Guidance for NPL
Candidate Sites.
See 0376
US EPA REGIONS 1-10
Analysis of State Superfund Programs: 50-
State Study, 1990 Update.
See 0448
Assessing Reports of Continuous Releases
of Hazardous Substances: A Guide for EPA
Regions.
See 1142
Data Quality Objectives for Remedial Re-
sponse Activities: Development Process. Ex-
ample Scenario: Rl/FS Activities at a Site
with Contaminated Soils and Ground Water.
See 0980
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
Frequency by PRP Name Report, September
26, 1991.
See 0610
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
National PRP Report by Site, September 26,
1991.
See 0619
US SUPERFUND
Compendium of CERCLA ARARs fact
sheets and directives.
See 0417
USEPA REGION 1
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 1, January
22, 1992.
See 0741
USEPA REGION 3
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 3, January
22, 1992.
See 0750
USEPA REGION 7
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 7, January
22, 1992.
See 0770
USEPA REGION 8
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 8, January
22, 1992.
See 0775
SU-107
-------
USEPA REGIONS 1-10
SUBJECT INDEX
UqEPA REGIONS 1-10,
f Site Enfgrcamenf Tracjcjng System (SETS):
PRP National Listing Alphabetically by Party
Nama, January 22,1992.
Sfl«p831
•;' ,$19 Enjofoarnorjt Tracjjing System (SETS):
I PRP National Listing by Site, January 22,
1992.
Sea 0837
USER MANUALS (COMPUTER PROGRAMS) '
jit^utoMtXJSE: ' An Improvement " to the
• MOUSE Computerized Uncertainty Analysis
System Operational Manual.
Soa1201
ICASHOUT User's Manual for Superfund.
Sea 0515
Continuous Release-Emergency Response
Notification System and Priority Assessment
Modal: User's Manual for EPA Regions.
Seta 1144
Inorganic Contract Compliance Screening
System Software for the PC (SOW March
1990 Version 1). User Manual.
Sea 0041
' Organic Contract Compliance Screening
! System. Software for the PC (OLM01.8 Ver-
sion 1). User Manual.
Sea 0057 ' . ™ „'!
!'Organic Contract Compliance Screening
I System. Software for the PC (OLM01.8 Ver-
sion 2) (Usor Manual).
Sao 0058
Organic Contract Compliance Screening
System. Software for the PC (SOW March
1990, Verston 1). User Manual.
Sea 0059
Ofgtnte Contract Compliance Screening
"System. Software for the PC (Version June
1990), User Manual.
Soo0060
PA-Soore (Preliminary Assessment Score)
User's Manual and Tutorial. Version 2.1.
Soo0367
PA-Soora Software, Version 1.0. Users
Manual and Tutorial.
Se«b37i
Removal Cost Management System: Version
L3.2.,,
Soo 1009
UTAH
National Priorities List Sites: Utah.
See 0276
National Priorities List Sites: Utah.
Soo 0277
National Priorities List Sites: Utah, 1992.
Soo 0278
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Sfte for Utah.
See 0805
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Utah.
Sea 0806
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Utah.
Sea 0807
VACUUM APPARATUS
Torm Vac In situ Vacuum Extraction System:
Applications Analysis Report,
Sea 1355
VENDORS " ,",' .'".'.'!
inventory of Treatability Study Vendors.
Volume 1.
Sea 1171
VEfjMONT , ,
National Priorities List Sites: Vermont.
See 0279
National Priorities List Sites: Vermont.
Soe0280
National Priorities List Sites: Vermont, 1992.
See 0281
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Vermont.
See 0808
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Vermont.
See 0809
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Vermont.
See 0810
VIRGIN ISLANDS
National Priorities List Sites: Puerto Rico and
Virgin Islands, 1992.
See 0261
VIRGINIA
National Priorities List Sites: Virginia.
See 0282
National Priorities List Sites: Virginia.
See 0283
National Priorities List Sites: Virginia, 1992.
See 0284
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Virginia.
See 0811
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Virginia.
See 0812
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Site Listing by Site for Virginia.
See 0848
VITRIFICATION
Babcock and Wilcox Cyclone Furnace Vitrifi-
cation. Technology Demonstration Summary.
See 1203
Immobilization Technology Seminar: Speaker
Slide Copies and Supporting Information.
See 1555
Innovative Technology: In-situ Vitrification.
See 1514
SITE Emerging Technologies Project: Bab-
cock and Wilcox Cyclone Vitrification.
See 1303
Technology Evaluation Report: Babcock and
Wilcox Cyclone Furnace Vitrification Tech-
nology. Volume 1.
See 1337
Technology Evaluation Report: Babcock and
Wilcox Cyclone Furnace Vitrification Tech-
nology. Volume 2.
See 1338
VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS
Air/Superfund National Technical Guidance
Study Series. Air Stripper Design Manual.
See 1374
Air/Superfund National Technical Guidance
Study Series. Comparisons of Air Stripper
Simulations and Field Performance Data.
See 1376
Air/Superfund National Technical Guidance
Study Series. Development of Example Pro-
cedures for Evaluating the Air Impacts of
Soil Excavation Associated with Superfund
Remedial Actions.
See 1380
Air/Superfund National Technical Guidance
Study Series: Estimation of Air Impacts for
Soil Vapor Extraction (SVE) Systems.
See 1383
Air/Superfund National Technical Guidance
Study Series. Models for Estimating Air
Emission Rates from Superfund Remedial
Actions.
See 1388
Evaluation of Portable Gas Chromatographs.
See 1479
Measurement of Volatile Organic Com-
pounds during Start-Up of Bioremediation of
French Limited Superfund Site in Crosby
Texas Using Wind Dependent Whole-Air
Sampling.
See 1414
Canister-Based Method for Monitoring Toxic
VOCs in Ambient Air.
See 1396
EPA Sjte Demonstration of the Terra Vac In
situ Vacuum Extraction Process in Grove-
land, Massachusetts. (Site Program Update:
Part VII).
See 1243
Field Demonstration of the UV/Oxidation
Technology to Treat Ground Water Contami-
nated with VOCs.
See 1452
Long-Path FTIR Measurements of Volatile
Organic Compounds in an Industrial Setting
(July 1989-April 1991).
See 1413
Remediation of Contaminated Soils by Sol-
vent Flushing.
See 1529
U.S. EPA SITE Demonstration of AWD Tech-
nologies' AquaDetox/SVE System.
See 1363
Sector Sampling for VOC's during Remedi-
ation of Superfund Site at Shaver's Farm,
Georgia.
See 1417
Superfund Guide: Reportable Quantity Ad-
justment for Methyl Isocyanate (MIC).
See 1152
Superfund Innovative Technology Evalua-
tion: The Delaware SITE Study, 1989.
See 1322
Technology Evaluation Report: Perox-Pure
(Trade Name) Chemical Oxidation Technolo-
gy-
See 1345
Technology Evaluation Report: SITE Pro-
gram Demonstration of the Ultrox Interna-
tional Ultraviolet Radiation/Oxidation Tech-
nology.
See 1351
Technology Evaluation Report: Site Program
Demonstration Test. Accutech Pneumatic
Fracturing Extraction and Hot Gas Injection,
Phase 1. Volume 1.
See 1352
Terra Vac In situ Vacuum Extraction System:
Applications Analysis Report.
See 1355
WASHING
Citizen's Guide to Soil Washing.
See 0458
Soil Washing Treatment.
See 1532
WASHINGTON (STATE)
National Priorities List Sites: Washington.
See 0285
National Priorities List Sites: Washington.
See 0286
National Priorities List Sites: Washington,
1992.
See 0287
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Washington.
See 0813
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Washington.
See 0814
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Washington.
See 0815
SU-108
-------
SUBJECT INDEX
WASTE DISPOSAL
WASTE
Technology Evaluation Report: SITE Pro-
gram Demonstration of the Ultrox Interna-
tional Ultraviolet Radiation/Oxidation Tech-
nology.
See 1351
WASTE DISPOSAL
Air/Superfund National Technical Guidance
Series. Superfund Air Pathway Analyses
Review Criteria Checklists.
See 1372
Air/Superfund National Technical Guidance
Study Series: Compilation of Information on
Real-Time Air Monitoring for Use at Super-
fund Sites.
See 1377
Air/Superfund National Technical Guidance
Study Series. Database of Emission Rate
Measurement Projects.
See 1379
Air/Superfund National Technical Guidance
Study Series: Evaluation of Short-Term Air
Action Levels for Superfund Sites.
See 1386
Air/Superfund National Technical Guidance
Study Series. Volume 1. Application of Air
Pathway Analyses for Superfund Activities.
See 1390
Air/Superfund National Technical Guidance
Study Series. Volume 4. Guidance for Ambi-
ent Air Monitoring at Superfund Sites (Re-
vised).
See 1393
Air/Superfund National Technical Guidance
Study Series. Volume 4. Procedures for Dis-
persion Modeling and Air Monitoring for Su-
perfund Air Pathway Analysis.
See 1394
Alternative Biological Treatment Processes
for Remediation of Creosote-and PGP-Con-
taminated Materials: Bench-Scale Treatabil-
ity Studies.
See 1418
American Combustion Pyretron Destruction
System. Applications Analysis Report.
See 1193
Analysis of State Superfund Programs: 50-
State Study.
See 0447
ARCS (Alternative Remedial Contract Strate-
gy) Contracts Users' Manual.
See 0019
Assessment of International Technologies
for Superfund Applications: Technology
Review and Trip Report Results.
See 1197
Assessment of Technologies for the Reme-
diation of Radioactively Contaminated Su-
perfund Sites.
See 1198
Assessment of Tentatively Identified Com-
pounds in Superfund Samples.
See 1199
ATSDR Health Consultations under
CERCLA.
See 1018
Basic Concepts of Contaminant Sorption at
Hazardous Waste Sites (Ground Water
Issue).
See 1431
Biological Assessment of Toxicity Caused by
Chemical Constituents Eluted from Site Soils
Collected at the Drake Chemical Superfund
Site, Lock Haven, Clinton Co., Pennsylvania.
See 1491
CERCLA Off-Site Policy: Providing Notice to
Facilities.
See 0415
CERCLA Removal Actions at Methane Re-
lease Sites.
See 0416
CERCLA/Superfund Orientation Manual.
See 0130
CERCLIS (Comprehensive Environmental
Response, Compensation, and Liability Infor-
mation System) Site Location Extract.
See 0012
Commencement Bay Nearshore/Tideflats
Feasibility Study. Development of Sediment
Cleanup Goals.
See 1578
Commencement Bay Nearshore/Tideflats
Feasibility Study. Executive Summary.
See 1579
Commencement Bay Nearshore/Tideflats
Feasibility Study. Volume 1.
See 1580
Commencement Bay Nearshore/Tideflats
Feasibility Study. Volume 2. Appendices.
See 1581
Compendium of ERT Groundwater Sampling
Procedures.
See 0903
Compendium of ERT Waste Sampling Pro-
cedures.
See 0907
Compendium of NPL Listing Policies and
Procedures, 1982 to 1985.
See 0338
Conducting Non-Time-Critical Removal Ac-
tions under CERCLA.
See 0999
Conducting Remedial Investigations/Feasi-
bility Studies for CERCLA Municipal Landfill
Sites.
See 1084
Continuous Release - Emergency Response
Notification System. User's Manual for In-
dustry.
See 1145
Cost of Remedial Action Model.
See 1085
Cost of Remedial Actions (CORA) Model:
Overview and Applications.
See 1086
Criteria for Choosing Indicator Species for
Ecological Risk Assessments at Superfund
Sites (90-6402).
See 1224
Data Quality Objectives for Remedial Re-^
sponse Activities: Development Process. Ex-"
ample Scenario: RI/FS Activities at a Site
with Contaminated Soils and Ground Water.
See 0980
Discharge of Wastewater from CERCLA
Sites into POTWS.
See 0421
Enforcement Project Management Hand-
book.
See 0531
Enforcement Project Management Hand-
book.
See 0532
Enforcement Project Management Hand-
book.
See 0533
Engineering Bulletin: Air Pathway Analysis.
See 1404
Engineering Bulletin: Landfill Covers.
See 1233
Ensuring the Adequacy of Cost Share Provi-
sions in Superfund State Contracts.
See 0472
Evaluation of Terrestrial Indicators for Use in
Ecological Assessments at Hazardous
Waste Sites.
See 1249
Expedited Response Actions.
See 1003
Forum Focus, August 1993.
See 0136
Framework for Real-Time Decision-Making:
New Bedford Harbor Pilot Dredging Study.
See 1587
Further Direction on Implementing the Su-
perfund Accelerated Cleanup Model (SACM).
See 0093
Guidance on CERCLA Settlements with De
Micromis Waste Contributors.
See 0547
Guidance on Implementation of the 'Contrib-
ute to Remedial Performance' Provision.
See 1093
Guide: Methods for Evaluating the Attain-
ment of Cleanup Standards for Soils and
Solid Media.
See 1508
Guide to Discharging CERCLA Aqueous
Wastes to Publicly Owned Treatment Works
(POTWs).
See 0423
Guide to Obtaining No Migration Variances
for CERCLA Remedial Actions.
See 0424
Handbook: Responding to Discharges of
Sinking Hazardous Substances.
See 1589
Hydrogeology and Results of Aquifer Tests
in the Vicinity of a Hazardous-Waste Dispos-
al Site Near Byron, Illinois.
See 1463
Importance of Quality for Collection of Envi-
ronmental Samples. Planning, Implementing,
and Assessing Field Sampling Quality at
CERCLA Sites. .
See 0919
In-situ Stabilization/Solidification of PCB
(Polychlorinated BiphenylsJ-Contaminated
Soil.
See 1556
In situ Treatment of Contaminated Ground
Water: An Inventory of Research and Field
Demonstrations and Strategies for Improving
Ground Water Remediation Technologies.
See 1466
Incineration Data on Arsenic and Lead Emis-
sions.
See 1267
Innovative Treatment Technologies: Over-
view and Guide to Information Sources.
See 1272
Inside the Hotline: A Compilation of 1992
Monthly Hotline Reports.
See 0141
Installation Restoration Program. Technical
Support Document for Record of Decision,
Cape Newenham, AFS.
See 1276
Installation Restoration Program Technical
Support Document for Record of Decision,
Tatalina Air Force Station LRRS Site.
See 1277
Interim Model CERCLA Section 122(g) (4)
De Minimis Waste Contributor Consent
Decree and Administrative Order on Con-
sent.
See 0565
International Waste Technologies/Geo-Con
In situ Stabilization/Solidification: Applica-
tions Analysis Report.
See 1557
Limited-Use Chemical Protective Clothing for
EPA Superfund Activities.
See 1058
Methodologies for Implementation of
CERCLA Section 122(g) (1) (A) De Minimis
Waste Contributor Settlements Proposals
and Agreements.
See 0572
SU-109
-------
WASTE DISPOSAL
SUBJECT INDEX
J,Jpb(|a Incineration: Ar) Analysis of the In-
dustry,
Soo 1480
New Approach and Methodologies for Char-
acterizing tha Hydrogeologic Properties of
Sea 1470
Notification oJ Hazardous Waste Sites Re-
quired Under Section 103(c) of the Compre-
henslve Environmental Response, Compen-
sation and Uablty Act (CERCLA) of 1980:
EPA Region 1.
Sea 1174
jJJotifjcattgn, of Hazardous, Waste, Sites ..... Re-,
'quired Under Section 103(c) of trie" Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compen-
sation and Liability Act (CERCLA) of 1980:
EPA Ragton 2.
See 1175
Notification of Hazardous Waste Sites Re-
quired Under Section 103{c) of the Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compen-
sation and Liability Act (CERCLA) of 1980:
EPA Region 3.
Soo 1176
Notification of Hazardous Waste Sites Re-
quired Under Section 103(c) of the Compre-
honsivo Envifonmental Response, Compen-
sation and Liability Act (CERCLA) of 1980:
EPARsgk>n4.
Sea 1177
Notification of Hazardous Waste Sites Re-
quired Under Section 103(c) of the Corripre-
honsr.'o Environmental Response, Compen-
sation and Uability Act (CERCLA) of 1980:
EPA Region 5.
§981178
Notification of Hazardous Waste Sites Re-
quired Under Section 1 03(c) of the Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compen-
sation and Liability Act (CERCLA) of 1980:
EPA Region 6.
See 1179
Notification of Hazardous Waste Sites Re-
..... cprad Under "Section i03(c) of the Compre-
rionsive Environmontal Response, Compen-
sation and Liability Act (CERCLA) of 1980:
..... EPA Region 7. ......
See 1180 ..................................
Notification of Hazardous Waste Sites Re-
quired Under Section 103(c) of the Compre-
hensive Envifonmental Response, Compen-
sation and Uability Act (CERCLA) of 1980:
EPA Rogton 8.
Sea 1181
Notification of Hazardous Waste- Sites Re-
quirod Under Section 103(c) of the Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compen-
sation and Liability Act (CERCLA) of 1980:
EPA Region 9.
Sea 1182
Notification of Hazardous Waste Sites Re-
quired Under Section 103(c) of the Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compen-
sation and Liability Act (CERCLA) of 1980:
EPA Region 10.
.See ,1,183
Operations and Research at the U.S. EPA
Incineration Research Facility: Annual
Rupert for FY89.
Seo 1482
Operations and Research at the U.S. EPA
Incineration Research Facility: Annual
Report for FY90.
Sea 1483
Operations and Research at the U.S. EPA
Incineration Research Facility: Annual
Report for FY91.
Sea 1484
PA Review Checklist.
See 0366
PA-Score (Preliminary Assessment Score),
Version 2.1, 3 1/2 Inch (for Microcomput-
ers).
See 0369
PA-Score (Preliminary Assessment Score),
Version 2.1, 5 1/4 inch (for Microcomput-
ers).
See 0370
Pilot-Scale Incineration of Comtaminated
Soils from the Drake Chemical Super-fund
Site.
See 1522
Pilot-Scale Incineration of PCB-Contaminat-
ed Sediments from the New Bedford Harbor
Hot Spot Superfund Site.
See 1292
Preliminary Ranking Evaluation Score
(PREscore) Version 1.1 (for Microcomput-
ers).
See 0372
PREscore Software: Users Manual and Tuto-
rial Version 2.0.
See 0375
Procedural Guidance on Treatment of Insur-
ers under CERCLA.
See 0589
Progress Toward Implementing Superfund.
Rscal Year 1988.
See 0299
Progress Toward Implementing Superfund.
Fiscal Year 1989.
See 0300
Quality Assurance for Superfund Environ-
mental Data Collection Activities.
See 0991
Quantifying Effects in Ecological Site As-
sessments: Biological and Statistical Consid-
erations.
See 1063
Reductive Dehalogenation of Organic Con-
taminants in Soils and Ground Water.
Ground Water Issue.
See 1527
Remedial Action, Treatment, and Disposal of
Hazardous Waste. Proceedings of the
Annual Hazardous Waste Research Sympo-
sium (17th). Held in Cincinnati, Ohio on April
9-11, 1991.
See 1135
Application of Tradescantia Micronucleus
Assay for In situ Evaluation of Potential Ge-
netic Hazards from Exposure to Chemicals
at a Wood-Preserving Site.
See 1195
Aseptic Sampling of Unconsolidated Heaving
Soils in Saturated Zones.
See 1489
Behavior of Arsenic in a Rotary Kiln Inciner-
ator (Journal Version).
See 1204
Bench-Scale Evaluation of Alternative Bio-
logical Treatment Processes for the Remedi-
ation of Pentachlorophenol- and Creosote-
Contaminated Materials: Slurry-Phase Biore-
mediation.
See 1419
Comparison: Organic Emissions from Haz-
ardous Waste Incinerators versus the 1990
Toxics Release Inventory Air Releases.
See 1217
Control of Transient Incinerator Emissions
with an Oxygen Based Combustion System.
See 1401
Control Technology: Estimating Innovative
Technology Costs for the SITE Program.
See 1222
EPA Site Demonstration of BioTrol Aqueous
Treatment System.
See 1441
Evaluation of Modifications to Extraction Pro-
cedures Used in Analysis of Environmental
Samples from Superfund Sites.
See 1247
Evaluation of Waste Stabilized by the Solidi-
tech SITE Technology.
See 1554
Filtration of Ground Water Samples for
Metals Analysis.
See 1454
Pilot-Scale Incinerability Evaluation of Ar-
senic-and Lead-Contaminated Soils from
Two Superfund Sites.
See 1288
Pilot-Scale Incineration of PCB-Contaminat-
ed Sediments from the Hot Spot of the New
Bedford Harbor Superfund Site.
See 1291
Quality Assurance for the SITE (Superfund
Innovative Technology Evaluation) Program
Demonstrations.
See 0992
Remediation of Contaminated Soils by Sol-
vent Flushing.
See 1529
SITE Demonstration of the American Com-
bustion Pyretron Oxygen-Enhanced Burner.
See 1299
SITE Demonstration of the CHEMFIX Solidi-
fication/Stabilization Process at the Portable
Equipment Salvage Company Site.
See 1559
Small Systems Meet Superfund Challenge
with Point-of-Entry Treatment Units.
See 1304
Respirometric Methods for Determination of
Biodegradability and Biodegradation Kinetics
for Hazardous Organic Pollutant Com-
pounds.
See 1427
Response Action Contractor Final Indemnifi-
cation Guidelines. Volume 2, Number 1,
March 1993.
See 0067
Retech, Inc., Plasma Centrifugal Furnace:
Applications Analysis Report.
See 1295
Revisions to OMB Circular A-94 on Guide-
lines and Discount Rates for Benefit-Cost
Analysis.
See 1107
ROD Annual Report, FY 1989.
See 1111
ROD Annual Report, FY 1990.
See 1112
ROD Annual Report, FY1991. Volume 1.
See 1113
ROD Annual Report, FY1991. Volume 2.
See 1114
Sector Sampling for VOC's during Remedi-
ation of Superfund Site at Shaver's Farm,
Georgia.
See 1417
Site Assessment: Evaluating Risks at Super-
fund Sites.
See 1076
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
Frequency by Party Name Report.
See 0607
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
Frequency by Party Name Report.
See 0608
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
Frequency by Party Name Report.
See 0609
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
Frequency by PRP Name Report, September
26, 1991.
See 0610
SU-110
-------
SUBJECT INDEX
WASTE DISPOSAL
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
National Alphabetical Report by PRP Name,
September 26, 1991.
See 0612
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
National Frequency by PRP Name Report.
See 0614
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
National PRP Listing Alphabetically by PRP
Name.
See 0615
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
National PRP Listing by Site.
See 0617
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
National PRP Listing by Site.
See 0618
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
National PRP Report by Site, September 26,
1991.
See 0619
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)
(National - 3 1/2 Inch Diskette, IBM PS/2
Compatible) (for Microcomputers).
See 0620
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Alabama.
See 0621
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Alabama.
See 0622
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Alabama.
See 0623
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for American Samoa.
See 0624
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for American Samoa.
See 0625
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for American Samoa.
See 0626
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Arizona.
See 0627
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Arizona.
See 0628
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Arizona.
See 0629
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Arkansas.
See 0630
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Arkansas.
See 0631
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Arkansas.
See 0632
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for California.
See 0633
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for California.
See 0634
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for California.
See 0635
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Colorado.
See 0636
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Colorado.
See 0637
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Colorado.
See 0638
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Connecticut.
See 0639
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Connecticut.
See 0640
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Connecticut.
See 0641
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Delaware.
See 0642
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Delaware.
See 0643
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Delaware.
See 0644
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Florida.
See 0645
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Florida.
See 0646
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Florida.
See 0647
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Georgia.
See 0648
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Georgia.
See 0649
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Georgia.
See 0650
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Idaho.
See 0651
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Idaho.
See 0652
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Idaho.
See 0653
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Illinois.
See 0654
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Illinois.
See 0655
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Illinois.
See 0656
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Indiana.
See 0657
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Indiana.
See 0658
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Indiana.
See 0659
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Iowa.
See 0660
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Iowa.
See 0661
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Iowa.
See 0662
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Kansas.
See 0663
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Kansas.
See 0664
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Kansas.
See 0665
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Kentucky.
See 0666
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Kentucky.
See 0667
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Kentucky.
See 0668
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Louisiana.
See 0669
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Louisiana.
See 0670
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Louisiana.
See 0671
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Maine.
See 0672
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Maine.
See 0673
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Maine.
See 0674
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Maryland.
See 0675
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Maryland.
See 0676
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Maryland.
See 0677
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Massachusetts.
See 0678
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Massachusetts.
See 0679
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Massachusetts.
See 0680
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Michigan.
See 0681
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Michigan.
See 0682
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Michigan.
See 0683
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Minnesota.
See 0684
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Minnesota.
See 0685
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Minnesota.
See 0686
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Mississippi.
See 0687
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Mississippi.
See 0688
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Mississippi.
See 0689
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Missouri.
See 0690
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Missouri.
See 0691
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Missouri.
See 0692
SU-111
-------
WASTE DISPOSAL
SUBJECT INDEX
• Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Montana.
Sea 0693
I Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Montana.
Saa 0694
Sit* Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Montana.
Sea 0695
Sita Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Nebraska.
Sea 0696
Stte Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Usfing by Site for Nebraska.
See 0697
Stta Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Nebraska.
Sea 0698
Sita Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Usting by Site for Nevada.
See 0699
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
:, FHP Listing by Site for Nevada.
See 0700
: Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Sita for Nevada.
Sea 0701
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PHP U»ttng by Site for New Hampshire.
See 0702
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Usting by Site for New Hampshire.
See 0703
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Usting by Sita for New Hampshire.
See 0704
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for New Jersey.
See 0705
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Ltetlng by Site for New Jersey.
See 0706
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Usting by Site for New Jersey.
Sea 0707
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Usting by Site for New Mexico.
Sea 0708
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Usting by Site for New Mexico.
See 0709
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Usting by Site for New Mexico.
Sea 0710
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Usting by Site for New York.
See 0711
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Usting by Site for New York.
See 0712
Site Entorcemanl Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Usting fay Site for New York.
See 0713
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Usting by Site for North Carolina.
See 0714
.SjJeEnfgrcemenJ Tracking System (SETS):
LPRP Usting by Site for North Carolina.
See 0715
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Usting by Site for North Carolina.
See 0716
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
; PRP Usting by Site for North Dakota.
See 0717
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Usting by Site for North Dakota.
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
£RP Usting by Site for North Dakota.
See 0719
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Northern Marianas.
See 0720
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Northern Marianas.
See 0721
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Northern Marianas.
See 0722
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Ohio.
See 0723
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Ohio.
See 0724
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Ohio.
See 0725
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Oklahoma.
See 0726
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Oklahoma.
See 0727
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Usting by Site for Oklahoma.
See 0728
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Oregon.
See 0729
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Oregon.
See 0730
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Oregon.
See 0731
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Pennsylvania.
See 0732
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Usting by Site for Pennsylvania.
See 0733
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Pennsylvania.
See 0734
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Puerto Rico.
See 0735
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Puerto Rico.
See 0736
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Puerto Rico.
See 0737
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 1.
See 0738
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 1, January
22, 1992.
See 0741
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 1. Volume 1.
See 0742
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 2.
See 0743
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 2, January
22, 1992.
See 0746
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 2. Volume 2.
See 0747
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 3.
See 0748
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 3, January
22, 1992.
See 0750
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 3. Volume 3.
See 0751
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 4.
See 0752
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 4, January
22, 1992.
See 0755
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 4. Volume 4.
See 0756
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 5.
See 0757
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 5, January
22, 1992.
See 0760
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 5. Volume 5.
See 0761
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 6.
See 0762
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 6, January
22, 1992.
See 0765
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 6. Volume 6.
See 0766
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 7.
See 0767
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 7, January
22, 1992.
See 0770
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 7. Volume 7.
See 0771
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 8.
See 0772
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 8, January
22, 1992.
See 0775
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 8. Volume 8.
See 0776
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 9.
See 0777
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Usting by Site for Region 9.
See 0778
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 9, January
22, 1992.
See 0780
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 9. Volume 9.
See 0781
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 10.
See 0782
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 10, January
22, 1992.
See 0785
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 10. Volume
10.
See 0786
SU-112
-------
SUBJECT INDEX
WASTE DISPOSAL
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Rhode Island.
See 0787
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Rhode Island.
See 0788
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Rhode Island.
See 0789
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for South Carolina.
See 0790
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for South Carolina.
See 0791
Site Enforcement tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for South Carolina.
See 0792
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for South Dakota.
See 0793
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for South Dakota.
See 0794
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for South Dakota.
See 0795
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Tennessee.
See 0796
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Tennessee.
See 0797
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Tennessee.
See 0798
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Texas.
See 0799
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Texas.
See 0800
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Texas.
See 0801
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Trust Territories.
See 0802
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Trust Territories.
See 0803
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Trust Territories.
See 0804
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Utah.
See 0805
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Utah.
See 0806
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Utah.
See 0807
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Vermont.
See 0808
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Vermont.
See 0809
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Vermont.
See 0810
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Virginia.
See 0811
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Virginia.
See 0812
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Washington.
See 0813
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Washington.
See 0814
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Washington.
See 0815
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for West Virginia.
See 0816
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for West Virginia.
See 0817
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for West Virginia.
See 0818
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Wisconsin.
See 0819
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Wisconsin.
See 0820
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Wisconsin.
See 0821
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Wyoming.
See 0822
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Wyoming.
See 0823
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Wyoming.
See 0824
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP National Frequency by Party Name,
January 22, 1992.
See 0825
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP National Listing Alphabetically by Party
Name.
See 0826
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP National Listing Alphabetically by Party
Name.
See 0827
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP National Listing Alphabetically by Party
Name.
See 0828
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP National Listing Alphabetically by Party
Name.
See 0829
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP National Listing Alphabetically by Party
Name, January 22, 1992.
See 0831
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP National Listing by Site.
See 0832
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP National Listing by Site.
See 0833
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP National Listing by Site.
See 0834
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP National Listing by Site.
See 0835
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP National Listing by Site, January 22,
1992.
See 0837
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Report by Site for Region 1, September
26, 1991.
See 0838
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Report by Site for Region 2, September
26, 1991.
See 0839
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Report by Site for Region 3, September
26, 1991.
See 0840
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Report by Site for Region 4, September
26, 1991.
See 0841
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Report by Site for Region 5, September
26, 1991.
See 0842
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Report by Site for Region 6, September
26, 1991.
See 0843
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Report by Site for Region 7, September
26, 1991.
See 0844
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Report by Site for Region 9, September
26, 1991.
See 0846
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Report by Site for Region 10, Septem-
ber 26, 1991.
See 0847
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Site Listing by Site for Virginia.
See 0848
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)
(Region 1 - 3 1/2 Inch Diskette IBM PS/2
Compatible) (for Microcomputers).
See 0849
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)
(Region 2-31/2 Inch Diskette IBM PS/2
Compatible) (for Microcomputers).
See 0851
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)
(Region 3-31/2 inch Diskette IBM PS/2
Compatible) (for Microcomputers).
See 0853
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)
(Region 4-31/2 Inch Diskette IBM PS/2
Compatible) (for Microcomputers).
See 0855
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)
(Region 5-31/2 Inch Diskette IBM PS/2
Compatible) (for Microcomputers).
See 0857
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)
(Region 6-3 1/2 Inch Diskette IBM PS/2
Compatible) (for Microcomputers).
See 0859
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)
(Region 7-3 1/2 Inch Diskette IBM PS/2
Compatible) (for Microcomputers).
See 0861
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)
(Region 8-31/2 Inch Diskette IBM PS/2
Compatible) (for Microcomputers).
See 0863
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)
(Region 9-31/2 Inch Diskette IBM PS/2
Compatible) (for Microcomputers).
See 0865
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)
(Region 10 - 3 1/2 Inch Diskette IBM PS/2
Compatible) (for Microcomputers).
See 0867
Some Major Factors Important in Establish-
ing Land Use Policy for Remediated Super-
fund Sites.
See 0308
Standard Document for Remedial Site As-
sessment Decisions.
See 0392
SU-113
-------
WASTE DISPOSALS
SUBJECT INDEX
Streamlined Approach for Settlements with
D« Minimis Waste Contributors under
CERCLA Section 122(g)(1)(A).
;, Sea 0870
= Structure and Components of Five-Year Re-
S«e 1120
Structure and Components of Five-Year Re-
Views.
See 1121
Suporfund Accelerated Cleanup Model
(SACM): Questions and Answers.
Sea 0121
Suporiund[Administrative Improvements. Ex-
acutiva Summary.
See 0310
.! Suportond Administrative Improvements.
,:.pn>|Report
Sea 0311
Superfund and Small Waste Contributors.
Sea 0881
Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Clean-
up Efforts.Nationwide. Fall 1992. (Lans-
downa Radioactive Residence Site Profile).
See 0946
Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Clean-
up Efforts Nationwide, Fall 1993 (Bunker Hill
Sits Profile, Silver Valley, Northern Idaho).
See 0951
Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Clean-
up Efforts Nationwide, Spring 1993 (French
Umitod Site Profile, Harris County, Texas).
Sea 0954
Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Clean-
up Efforts Nationwide, Spring 1993 (Fulton
Terminals Site Profile, Oswego County, NY).
Sea 0955
Suportund at Work: Hazardous Waste Clean-
up Efforts Nationwide, Spring 1993 (Harvey
and Knott Drum Site, New Castle County,
Delaware),
Sea 0956
Suporfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Clean-
up Efforts Nationwide, Spring 1993 (Old Mid-
land Products Site Profile, Yell County, Ar-
kansas).
Sea 0957
Suporiund at Work: Hazardous Waste Clean-
;up Efforts Nationwide, Summer 1993 (Army
Creek Landfill Site Profile, New Castle, Dela-
ware), : :" : : :
S000962
Suporfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Clean-
up Efforts Nationwide, Summer 1993 (Chis-
rnan Creek Site Profile, York County, Virgin-
la).
See 0963
Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Clean-
up Efforts Nationwide, Summer 1993
(Common Steps in the Removal Process).
See 0965
Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Clean-
up Efforts Nationwide, Summer 1993 (East-
ern Diversified Metals Site Profile, Schuylkill
County, Pennsylvania).
Sea 0966
Suporfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Clean-
up Efforts Nationwide, Summer 1993 (Fike/
Artet Chemical Site Profile, Nitro, West Vir-
oMa).
Sea 0967
Suporiund at Work: Hazardous Waste Clean-
up Efforts Nationwide, Summer 1993 (North-
side Landfill Site Profile, Spokane. Washing-
ton).
See 0968
Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Clean-
up Efforts Nationwide, Summer 1993 (Rogue
Vatiey/Dttch Creek Ranch Site Profile,
Wimar, Oregon).
S09 0969
Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Clean-
up Efforts Nationwide, Winter 1994 (Bailey
Waste Disposal Site Profile, Texas).
See 0973
Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Clean-
up Efforts Nationwide, Winter 1994 (Sey-
mour Recycling Site Profile, Seymour, Indi-
ana).
See 0975
Superfund Emergency Response Actions: A
Summary of Federally-Funded Removals.
Volume 1.
See 0316
Superfund Emergency Response Actions: A
Summary of Federally-Funded Removals.
Volume 2.
See 0317
Superfund Emergency Response Actions: A
Summary of Federally Funded Removals.
Volume 3.
See 0318
Superfund Engineering Issue: Issues Affect-
ing the Applicability and Success of Remedi-
al/Removal Incineration Projects.
See 1308
Superfund Fact Sheet: An Overview.
See 0487
Superfund Fact Sheet: Community Inter-
views.
See 0490
Superfund Fact Sheet: Identifying Sites.
See 0491
Superfund Fact Sheet: Public Involvement.
See 0493
Superfund Fact Sheet: The Remedial Pro-
gram.
See 0494
Superfund Fact Sheet: The Removal Pro-
gram.
See 0495
SUPERFUND: Focusing on the Nation at
Large. A Decade of Progress at National
Priorities List Sites.
See 0321
Superfund Innovative Technology Evalua-
tion: The Delaware SITE Study, 1989.
See 1322
Superfund Progress - Aficionado's Version
(Progress as of March 31, 1992).
See 0326
Superfund Remedial Action Decision Proc-
ess: Database for Selected FY87 Records of
Decision.
See 1136
Technology Evaluation Report: International
Waste Technologies/Geo-Con In situ Stabili-
zation/Solidification. Volume 3. Update
Report.
See 1567
Technology Evaluation Report of Retech,
Inc., Plasma Centrifugal Furnace. Volume 1.
See 1340
Technology Evaluation Report: SITE Pro-
gram. CF Systems Organics Extraction
System, New Bedford, Massachusetts.
Volume 1.
See 1346
Technology Evaluation Report: SITE Pro-
gram. CF Systems Organics Extraction
System, New Bedford, Massachusetts.
Volume 2.
See 1347
Technology Selection Guide for Wood Treat-
er Sites.
See 1122
Terra Vac In situ Vacuum Extraction System:
Applications Analysis Report.
See 1356
Use of a Fourier Transform Spectrometer as
a Remote Sensor at Superfund Sites.
See 1365
WASTE DISPOSALS
Technology Evaluation Report of Retech,
Inc., Plasma Centrifugal Furnace. Volume 2.
See 1341
WASTE MANAGEMENT
Abstract Proceedings: Superfund Technical
Support Project General Meeting. Held in
Athens, Georgia oh December 3-6,1990.
See 1187
Accelerating Potentially Responsible Party
Remedial Design Starts: Implementing the
30-Day Study.
See 0509
Accessing Federal Data Bases for Contami-
nated Site Clean-Up Technologies (Third
Edition).
See 1185
Accessing Federal Data Bases for Contami-
nated Site Clean-Up Technologies (Second
Edition).
See 1189
Administrative Order on Consent for Reme-
dial Investigations/Feasibility Study.
See 0510
Administrative Penalty Procedures.
See 0511
Advancing the Use of Treatment Technol-
ogies for Superfund Remedies.
See 1191
Air Superfund National Technical Guidance
Study Series. Estimation of Air Impacts for
the Excavation of Contaminated Soil.
See 1384
Air/SUperfund National Technical Guidance
Study Series. Guideline for Predictive Base-
line Emissions Estimation Procedures for Su-
perfund Sites.
See 1387
Air Superfund National Technical Guidance
Study Series. Screening Procedures for Esti-
mating the Air Impacts of Incineration at Su-
perfund Sites.
See 1389
Amendment to Historical Definitions of NPL
Deletion Start and Completion Dates.
See 0335
Analysis of State Superfund Programs: 50-
State Study, 1990 Update.
See 0448
Analysis of State Superfund Programs: 50-
State Study. 1991 Update.
See 0449
Annual RREL Research Symposium (20th)
Abstract Proceedings. Held in Cincinnati,
Ohio on March 15-17, 1994.
See 1184
Applicability of Land Disposal Restrictions to
RCRA and CERCLA Ground Water Treat-
ment Reinjection Superfund Management
Review: Recommendation No. 26.
See 1430
Approval of Long Term Contracting Strategy
for Superfund (Superfund Management
Review: Recommendation E.2).
See 0018
ARAR's Q's and A's. Compliance with the
Toxicity Characteristics Rule. Part 1.
See 0396
ARARs Fact Sheet: Compliance with the
Clean Air Act and Associated Air Quality Re-
quirements.
See 0397
ARARs Q's and A's.
See 0398,
ARARS Q's and A's: Compliance with Fed-
eral Water Quality Criteria.
See 0399
•"•::,!:• . „ .. ;;
SU-114
-------
SUBJECT INDEX
WASTE MANAGEMENT
ARARs Q's and A's: General Policy, RCRA,
CWA, SDWA, Post-ROD Information, and
Contingent Waivers.
See 0401
ARARs Q's and A's: State Ground-Water
Antidegradation Issues.
See 0402
ARARs Q's and A's: The Fund-Balancing
Waiver.
See 0403
Arbitration Procedures for Smalt Superfund
Cost Recovery Claims.
See 0512
ARCS Construction Contract Modification
Procedures.
See 0020
ARCS Work Assignment Management: Field
Guide.
See 0021
Assessing Sites under SACM: Interim Guid-
ance. Volume 1, Number 4, Deccember
1992.
See 0084
Assurance of Hazardous Waste Capacity,
Guidance to State Officials. Assistance in
Fulfilling the Requirements of CERCLA
104(c)(9).
See 0129
Audit Management Process. Reference
Guide.
See 0085
Audits and the Superfund Program Manager.
See 0086
Authority to Use CERCLA to Provide En-
forcement Funding Assistance to States.
See 0450
AWD Technologies Integrated AquaDetox
(Trade Name)/SVE Technology: Applications
Analysis Report.
See 1202
Bioremediation: An Information Update on
Applying Bioremediation to Site Cleanup.
See 1421
Bioremediation in the Field. An Information
Update on Applying Bioremediation to Site
Clean-Up. Number 3.
See 1422
Bioremediation in the Field: An Information
Update on Applying Bioremediation to Site
Cleanup. (Number 4).
See 1423
Bioremediation in the Field: Number 1, No-
vember 1990.
See 1424
BioTrol Soil Washing System for Treatment
of a Wood Preserving Site: Applications
Analysis Report.
See 1492
CERCLA Community Relations Mailing Lists.
See 0451
CERCLA Compliance with Other Environ-
mental Statutes.
See 0404
CERCLA Compliance with Other Laws
Manual: CERCLA Compliance with the CWA
and SDWA.
See 0406
CERCLA Compliance with Other Laws
Manual: Guide to Manual.
See 0407
CERCLA Compliance with Other Laws
Manual: Overview of ARARs - Focus on
ARAR Waivers.
See 0408
CERCLA Compliance with Other Laws
Manual. Part 1. Interim Final.
See 0409
CERCLA Compliance with Other Laws
Manual: RCRA ARARS-Focus on Closure
Requirements.
See 0410
CERCLA Compliance with the RCRA Toxici-
ty Characteristics (TC) Rule: Part 2.
See 0412
CERCLA Enforcement Policy Compendium
Update.
See 0516
CERCLA Implementation of Inspector Train-
ing Requirements for OSCs/RPMs at the In-
termediate Level in STEP and First-Line Su-
pervisors.
See 0517
CERCLA Implementation of the Training Re-
quirements of EPA Order 3500.1. Inspector
Training.
See 0518
CERCLA Notifications: Emergency Re-
sponse Notification System (ERNS) Fact
Sheet.
See 0926
CERCLA Site Discharges to POTWS
CERCLA Site Sampling Program: Detailed
Data Report.
See 1575
CERCLA Site Discharges to POTWS Treat-
ability Manual.
See 1577
CERCLA Waste Capacity Assurance.
See 0131
CERCLIS Listing.
See 0014
Characterizing soils for hazardous waste site
assessments.
See 1495
Chemical Dehalogenation Treatability Stud-
ies under CERCLA: An Overview.
See 1209
Citizen's Guide to Air Sparging.
See 0452
Citizen's Guide to Bioventing.
See 0453
Citizen's Guide to In situ Soil Flushing.
See 0456
Citizen's Guide to Innovative Treatment
Technologies for Contaminated Soils,
Sludges, Sediments and Debris.
See 0457
Citizen's Guide to Using Indigenous and Ex-
ogenous Microorganisms in Bioremediation.
See 0461
Citizens' Guidance Manual for the Technical
Assistance Grant Program.
See 0462
Citizens' Guidance Manual for the Technical
Assistance Grant Program.
See 0463
Clarification of Delegation to Approve Con-
sistency Exemptions at NPL Sites.
See 0336
Closing the NPL Book under the Original
HRS.
See 0337
Community Relations during Enforcement
Activities and Development of the Adminis-
trative Record.
See 0466
Community Relations in Superfund: A Hand-
book.
See 0467
Community Relations: Use of Senior Envi-
ronmental Employees in Superfund (Super-
fund Management Review: Recommendation
43.K.L).
See 0088
Comparative Analysis of Remedies Selected
in the Superfund Program during FY 87, FY
88 and FY 89.
See 0519
Compendium of CERCLA ARARs fact
sheets and directives.
See 0417
Compendium of ERT Air Sampling Proce-
dures.
See 0901
Compendium of ERT Field Analytical Proce-
dures.
See 0902
Compendium of ROD Language for FY 1993
Focus Areas.
See 1083
Congressional Limits for FY 92 Alternative
Remedial Contracting Strategy (ARCS) Pro-
gram Management Costs.
See 0022
Consent Orders and the Reimbursement
Provision Under Section 106(b) of CERCLA.
See 0520
Consideration of RCRA Requirements in
Performing CERCLA Responses at Mining
Waste Sites.
See 0420
Considerations in Ground Water Remedi-
ation at Superfund Sites.
See 1436
Consultation on Records of Decision
(RODS) for Containment-Only Remedies.
See 0521
Contingency Analysis Modeling for Super-
fund Sites and Other Sources.
See 1219
Continuous Release-Emergency Response
Notification System and Priority Assessment
Model: Model Documentation.
See 1143
Continuous Release-Emergency Response
Notification System and Priority Assessment
Model: User's Manual for EPA Regions.
See 1144
Control of Air Emissions from Materials Han-
dling during Remediation. Engineering Bulle-
tin.
See 1398
Control of Air Emissions from Superfund Air
Strippers at Superfund Groundwater Sites.
See 1399
Control Technologies for Defunct lead Bat-
tery Recycling Sites: Overview and Recent
Developments. Volume 3.
See 1220
Coordination of EPA and State Actions in
Cost Recovery.
See 0522
Cost Recovery Actions/Statute of Limita-
tions.
See 0523
Cost Recovery Actions under CERCLA.
See 0524
Cost Recovery Referrals.
See 0525
Counting State-Lead Enforcement NPL Sites
Toward the CERCLA Section 116(e) Reme-
dial Action Start Mandate.
See 0468
Criminal Investigations and the Superfund
Program.
See 0469
Discussions with the Public Concerning NPL
Listings.
See 0339
Early Action and Long-Term Action under
SACM: Interim Guidance, Volume 1, Number
2, December 1992.
See 0089
ECO Update. Volume 1, Number 3. The
Role of Natural Resource Trustees in the
Superfund Process.
See 1021
SU-115
-------
WASTE MANAGEMENT
SUBJECT INDEX
;;;;,ECO,,, Update, Vojume 1, Number 4. Develop-
ing a Work Scope for Ecological Assess-
ments.
SM1022
Emergency Response Notification System.
Sea 0927
Endangermont Assessment Guidance.
Soa 0527
Endangorment Assessment Guidance.
Sea 0528
' Endangerment Assessment Handbook.
See OS29
Endanoerment Assessment Handbook.
Seo0530
Enforcement under SACM: Interim Guid-
ance. Volume 1, Number 3, December 1992.
Soo0090
Enhancing State Superfund Capabilities:
Nine-State Study.
Ssa 0471
Entry and Continued Access under CERCLA.
Sea 0534
: Envtronmental Characteristics of EPA, NRC,
and DOE Sites Contaminated with Radioac-
livo Substances.
Sea 1237
Environmental Compliance Branch, Standard
Operating Procedures and Quality Assurance
Manual, Revision 1.
See 0535
EPA Interim Guidance on Indemnification of
Superfund Response Action Contractors
Under Section 119 of SARA.
Saa 0536
EPA Oversight of Remedial Designs and Re-
medial Actions Performed by PRPs.
-;§f« 11,24
:: i E'PA/O.S. Army Corps" of Engineers Payment
i Process, Direct Cite/Revised Reimbursa-
',, mont Methods.
See 1125
i EPA/USACE Payment Process: Direct Cite/
Revised Reimbursement Methods.
::Seail26
Establishing Work Zones at Uncontrolled
" "Hazardous Waste Sites.
Sea 0908
: Evaluation and Testing of a Protocol to De-
tormino tho Aerobic Degradation Potential of
Hazardous Waste Constituents in Soil.
- See 1503
Evaluation of, and Additional Guidance on,
Issuance of Unilateral Administrative Orders
(UAOs) for RD/RA.
Sea 0538
Evaluation of Soil Venting Application.
Ground Water Issue.
See 1505
Exemptions from the Statutory Limits on Re-
moval Actions.
,. .Sea 1002
i Exercising Flexibility through the Superfund
- Accelerated Cleanup Model (SACM).
«. Sea 0091
•" Expanded Civil Judicial Referral Procedures.
"S«9'b5"39
i! Expansion of Direct Referral of Cases to the
::: Department of Justice.
Sea 0540
:- Expediting Remedial Construction.
Sea 1127
Extending the tracking of Analytical Serv-
ices to Potentially Responsible Party-Lead
i Superfund Sites (Supplemental Guidance on
OSWER Directive 9240.0-2A).
!:;;; Se«p?86
• Feasibility Study: Detailed Analysis of Reme-
dial Action Alternatives.
""Saa, 1,088
IK1' Faisftiliy" Study: Development arid Screen-
ing of Remedial Action Alternatives.
See 1089
Field Standard Operating Procedures for Air
Surveillance F.S.O.P. No. 8.
See 0910
Field Standard Operating Procedures for Es-
tablishing Work Zones (F.S.O.P. 6).
See 0911
Field Standard Operating Procedures for
Preparation of a Site Safety Plan F.S.O.P.
No. 9.
See 0912
Field Standard Operating Procedures for the
Decontamination of Response Personnel
F.S.O.P. No. 7.
See 0913
Final EPA Policy on the Inclusion of Environ-
mental Auditing Provisions in Enforcement
Settlements.
See 0541
Final Guidance on Administrative Records
for Selecting CERCLA Response Actions.
See 0473
Final Guidance on Implementation of the
'Consistency' Exemption to the Statutory
Limits on Removal Actions.
See 1004
Rnal Guidance on Preparing Waste-In Lists
and Volumetric Rankings for Release to Po-
tentially Responsible Parties (PRPs) under
CERCLA ('Waste-In' Guidance).
See 0542
Final Policy on Setting RI/FS Priorities.
See 1090
First 125 De Minimis Settlements: Statistics
from EPA's De Minimis Database.
See 0543
Funding of State Enforcement Related Ac-
tivities.
See 0474
Furthering the Use of Innovative Treatment
Technologies in OSWER Programs.
See 1255
FY 1992 Themes for Regional Coordination
to Support Continuous Improvements of Su-
perfund's Remedial Program.
See 1091
Getting Ready: Scoping the RI/FS.
See 1092
Guidance for Capacity Assurance Planning.
Capacity Planning Pursuant to CERCLA Sec-
tion 104(c)(9).
See 0137
Guidance for Coordinating ATSDR Health
Assessment Activities with the Superfund
Remedial Process.
See 1029
Guidance for Data Useability in Risk Assess-
ment.
See 1031
Guidance for Data Useability in Risk Assess-
ment (Part A).
See 1033
Guidance for Environmental Priorities Initia-
tive (EPI) Facilities in the Superfund Pre-Re-
medial Program.
See 0341
Guidance for Organizing ARCS Contract
Files.
See 0025
Guidance for Performing Site Inspections
under CERCLA.
See 0343
Guidance of the Use of Stipulated Penalties
in Hazardous Waste Consent Decrees.
See 0544
Guidance on Applicability of EPA Order
3500.1 to CERCLA Staff.
See 0545
Guidance" on CERClA Section 106 Judicial
Actions.
See 0546
Guidance on CERCLA 106(a) Unilateral Ad-
ministrative Orders for Remedial Designs
and Remedial Actions.
See 0548
Guidance on Documenting Decisions Not to
Take Cost Recovery Actions.
See 0549
Guidance on Drafting Consent Decrees in
Hazardous Waste Cases.
See 0550
Guidance on Expediting Remedial Design
and Remedial Action.
See 1129
Guidance on Federal Superfund Liens.
See 0551
Guidance on Implementation of the Super-
fund Accelerated Cleanup Model (SACM)
under CERCLA and the NCP.
See 0094
Guidance on Landowner Liability under Sec-
tion 107(a)(1) of CERCLA, De Minimis Set-
tlements under Section 122(g)(1KB) of
CERCLA, and Settlements with Prospective
Purchasers of Contaminated Property.
See 0552
Guidance on Oversight of Potentially Re-
sponsible Party Remedial Investigations and
Feasibility Studies. Volume 1.
See 1094
Guidance on Oversight of Potentially Re-
sponsible Party Remedial Investigations and
Feasibility Studies. Volume 2. Appendices.
See 1095
Guidance on Premium Payments in CERCLA
Settlements.
See 0553
Guidance on Preparing Waste-in Lists and
Volumetric Rankings for Release to Poten-
tially Responsible Parties (PRPs) under
CERCLA.
See 0554
Guidance on Procedures for Submitting
CERCLA Section 106(b) Reimbursement Pe-
titions and on EPA Review of Those Peti-
tions.
See 0555
Guidance on Program Management Activi-
ties under ARCS.
See 0026
Guidance on Site Assessment Cooperative
Agreements.
See 0475
Guidance Regarding CERCLA Enforcement
against Bankrupt Parties.
See 0556
Guide for Conducting Treatability Studies
under CERCLA: Aerobic Biodegradation
Remedy Screening.
See 1156
Guide for Conducting Treatability Studies
under CERCLA: Aerobic Biodegradation
Remedy Screening. Interim Guidance.
See 1157
Guide for Conducting Treatability Studies
under CERCLA: Aerobic Biodegradation
Remedy Screening. Quick Reference Fact
Sheet.
See 1158
Guide for Conducting Treatability Studies
under CERCLA: Biodegradation Remedy Se-
lection. Quick Reference Fact Sheet.
See 1160
Guide for Conducting Treatability Studies
under CERCLA: Chemical Dehalogenation.
See 1161
Guide for Conducting Treatability Studies
under CERCLA: Chemical Dehalogenation.
Final Report.
See 1162
SU-116
-------
SUBJECT INDEX
WASTE MANAGEMENT
Guide for Conducting Treatability Studies
under CERCLA: Soil Vapor Extraction. Quick
Reference Fact Sheet.
See 1164
Guide for Conducting Treatability Studies
under CERCLA Solvent Extraction. Interim
Guidance.
See 1167
Guide for Conducting Treatability Studies
under CERCLA: Solvent Extraction Quick
Reference Fact Sheet.
See 1168
Guide for Conducting Treatability Studies
under CERCLA: Thermal Desorption Quick
Reference Fact Sheet.
See 1169
Guide for Conducting Treatability Studies
under CERCLA: , Thermal Desorption
Remedy Selection. Interim Guidance.
See 1170
Guide on Remedial Actions at Superfund
Sites with PCB Contamination.
See 1262
Guide to Addressing Pre-ROD and Post-
ROD Changes.
See 1096
Guide to Delisting of RCRA Wastes for Su-
perfund Remedial Responses.
See 0422
Guide to Developing Action Memorandums.
See 1097
Guide to Developing Superfund No Action,
Interim Action, and Contingency Remedy
RODS. . ,
See 1098
Guide to Developing Superfund Proposed
Plans.
See 1099
Guide to Management of Investigation-De-
rived Wastes.
See 0345
Guide to Pump and Treat Groundwater Re-
mediation Technology.
See 1462
Guide to Removal Enforcement.
See 1006
Guide to Selecting Superfund Remedial Ac-
tions.
See 1100
Harmonization of QA Procedures for Envi-
ronmental Data Operations: Development of
a National Consensus Standard for Quality
Assurance for Environmental Programs.
See 0989
Hazard Ranking System Guidance Manual.
See 0346
Hazardous Waste Operations and Emergen-
cy Response: Uncontrolled Hazardous
Waste Sites and RCRA Corrective Actions.
See 0425
Hazardous Waste Operations and Emergen-
cy Response: RCRA TSD and Emergency
Response Without Regard to Location.
See 0914
Headquarters Support Contract Management
Procedures.
See 0029
HSED SACM Report. Volume 1, Number 1,
January 1993.
See 0096
Identification of a Senior Superfund Official
for Addressing Special NPL Site-Related
Issues.
See 0348
Implementation of the Decentralized Con-
tractor Performance Evaluation and Award
Fee Process for Selected Remedial Program
Contracts.
See 0031
Implementing the Deputy Administrator's
Risk Characterization Memorandum.
See 1056
In situ Soil Flushing. Engineering Bulletin.
See 1510
Index to the Monthly Hotline Report Ques-
tions (June 1982 to December 1991).
See 0139
Initiation of PRP-Financed Remedial Design
in Advance of Consent Decree Entry (Final).
See 0557
Initiatives to Streamline the Alternative Re-
medial Contracting Strategy (ARCS) Con-
tracts' Award Fee Process.
See 0033
innovative Methods to Increase Public In-
volvement in Superfund Community Rela-
tions (Superfund Management Review Rec-
ommendation No. 43.A).
See 0097
Innovative Technology: BEST Solvent Ex-
traction Process.
See 1270
Innovative Technology: Glycolate Dehalo-
genation.
See 1513
Innovative Technology: In-situ Vitrification.
See 1514
Innovative Technology: Slurry-Phase Biode-
gradation.
See 1271
Innovative Technology: Soil Washing.
See 1515
Inorganic Contract Compliance Screening
System (ICCSS) Software (ILM02.1 Version
2) (for Microcomputers).
See 0036
Inorganic Contract Compliance Screening
System (ICCSS) Software (ILM02.1 Version
3) (for Microcomputers).
See 0037
Inorganic Contract Compliance Screening
System (ICCSS) Software (SOW March
1990) (Version 1) (for Microcomputers).
See 0040
Inorganic Contract Compliance Screening
System Software for the PC (SOW March
1990 Version 1). User Manual.
See 0041
Inside the Hotline: A Compilation of 1991
Monthly Hotline Reports. " •
See 0140
Inside the Hotline: A Compilation of 1992
Monthly Hotline Reports.
See 0141
Integrated Timeline for Superfund Site Man-
agement (SMR 5,15).
See 0098
Interim Cashout Settlement Procedures.
See 0558
Interim CERCLA Settlement Policy.
See 0559
Interim Final Guidance Package on Funding
CERCLA State Enforcement Actions at NPL
Sites.
See 0477
Interim Guidance for Soil Ingestion Rates.
See 1057
Interim Guidance on Establishing Soil Lead
Cleanup Levels at Superfund Sites. Supple-
ment to Interim Guidance on Establishing
Soil Lead Cleanup Levels at Superfund
Sites.
See 1516
Interim Guidance on Potentially Responsible
Party Participation in Remedial Investigations
and Feasibility Studies.
See Q561
Interim Guidance on Settlements with De
Minimis Waste Contributors under Section
122(g)of SARA.
See 0562
Interim Guidance: Streamlining the CERCLA
Settlement Decision Process.
See 0563
Interim Guidelines for Preparing Nonbinding
Preliminary Allocations of Responsibility.
See 0564
Interim RCRA/CERCLA Guidance on Non-
Contiguous Sites and On-Site Management
on Waste and Treatment Residue.
See 0427
International Symposium on Field Screening
Methods for Hazardous Wastes and Toxic
Chemicals (2nd), Proceedings. Held in Las
Vegas, Nevada on February 12-14, 1991.
See 1279
Issuance of Administrative Orders for Imme-
diate Removal Actions.
See 0567
Issuance of Administrative Orders Under
Section 3013 of the Resource Conservation
and Recovery Act.
See 0568
Issuance of Final Revised Guidance on the
Use and Issuance of Administrative Orders
Under Section 7003 of the Resource Con-
servation and Recovery Act (RCRA).
See 0569
Land Disposal Restrictions as Relevant and
Appropriate Requirements for CERCLA Con-
taminated Soil and Debris.
See 0428
Liability of Corporate Shareholders and Suc-
cessor Corporations for Abandoned Sites
Under the Comprehensive Environmental
Response, Compensation and Liability Act.
See 0570
Limiting Lead Transfers to Private Parties
during Discrete Phases of the Remedial
Process.
See 0571
Long-Term Contracting Strategy for Super-
fund.
See 0042
Making Superfund Documents Available to
the Public throughout the Cleanup Process,
and Discussing Site Findings and Decisions
as They are Developed (Superfund Manage-
ment Review: No..43 G, H, Q, R, T).
See 0100
Management of Investigation-Derived
Wastes during Site Inspections.
See 0349
Measurement of Volatile Organic Com-
pounds during Start-Up of Bioremediation of
French Limited Superfund Site in Crosby
Texas Using Wind Dependent Whole-Air
. Sampling.
See 1414
Methodology for Early De Minimis Waste
Contributor Settlements under CERCLA Sec-
tion 122(g) (1) (A).
See 0573
Minimizing Problems Caused by Staff Turn-
over (Superfund Management Review: Rec-
ommendation No. 43, M, N, O).
See 0105
Mining Sites on the National Priorities List:
NPL Site Summary Reports. Volume 1 (Alu-
minum Company of America (Vancouver
Smelter) to Cleveland Mill).
See 0350
Mining Sites on the National Priorities List:
NPL Site Summary Reports. Volume 2
(Commencement Bay Nearshore/Tideflats to
Kerr McGee) (Kress Creek, Reed-Keppler
Park, Residential Areas, Sewage Treatment
Plant).
See 0351
SU-117
-------
WASTE MANAGEMENT
SUBJECT INDEX
Mining Sites on the National Priorities List:
NPt Sita Summary Reports. Volume 3 (Kerr-
McGee Chemical Corp. (Soda Springs Plant)
to Ormet Corp).
See 0352
Mining Sites on the National Priorities List:
NPL Site Summary Reports. Volume 4
(Oronogo-Duenweg Mining Belt to Tar
Creak).
Sea 0353
Mining Sites on the National Priorities List:
NPL Site Summary Reports. Volume 5 (Tele-
dyne Wan Chang to Wayne Interim Storage
Fac«ty/W.R. Grace).
See 0354
Model Administrative Order on Consent for
Removal Actions.
Sea 0574
Model Informational Notice Letter to Local
Governments.
See 0575
Mode! Litigation Report for CERCLA Sec-
lions 106 and 107 and RCRA Section 7003.
See 0576
Model Statement of Work for a Remedial
Investigation and Feasibility Study Conduct-
ed by Potentially Responsible Parties.
Scs 0578
;: Model Unilateral Administrative Order for Re-
moval Response Activities.
Sea 0579
Model Unilateral Order for Remedial Design
and Remedial Action.
See 0580
Multi-Media Settlements of Enforcement
Claims.
Sea 0581
Multi-Madia Settlements of Enforcement
Claims.
Sea 0582
Municipal Settlements.
Sea 0583
National Superfund Program Priorities, Fiscal
Year 1994.
Soe 0298
Notification of Out-of-State Shipments of Su-
pertund Site Wastes.
Sea 0429
Notification Requirements for Continuous
Releases of Hazardous Substances.
;r;.: See 1148
OERR Organizational Conflict of Interest
Revtow and Approval Program (Superfund
Management Review: Recommendation No.
46C),
See 0046
Off-Site Policy: RFA or Equivalent Investiga-
tion Requirement at RCRA Treatment and
Storage Facilities.
Sea 0431
Organic Contract Compliance Screening
System (OCCSS) Software (OLM01.8 Ver-
sion 2) (for Microcomputers).
Sea 0049
Organic Contract Compliance Screening
System (OCCSS) Software (OLM01.8 Ver-
sion 3) (for Microcomputers).
See 0050
Organic Contract Compliance Screening
System (OCCSS) Software (OLM01.8 Ver-
sion 6) (for Microcomputers).
See 0053
Organic Contract Compliance Screening
System (OCCSS) Software (SOW February
1988) (for Microcomputers).
See 0054
Organic Contract Compliance Screening
System (OCCSS) Software (SOW March
• 1990) (Vorston 1) (for Microcomputers).
See 0055
Organic Contract Compliance Screening
System (OCCSS) Software (SOW OLM01.8
Version January 1992) (Version 1) (for
Microcomputers).
See 0056
Organic Contract Compliance Screening
System. Software for the PC (OLM01.8 Ver-
sion 1). User Manual.
See 0057
Organic Contract Compliance Screening
System. Software for the PC (OLM01.8 Ver-
sion 2) (User Manual).
See 0058
Organic Contract Compliance Screening
System. Software for the PC (SOW March
1990, Version 1). User Manual.
See 0059
Organic Contract Compliance Screening
System. Software for the PC (Version June
1990). User Manual.
See 0060
OSWER Comparative Risk Project. Execu-
tive Summary and Overview.
See 1062
OSWER Integrated Health and Safety Stand-
ard Operating Practices.
See 0921
OSWER Source Book: Training and Tech-
nology Transfer Resources.
See 1283
OSWER Source Book. Volume 1. Training
and Technology Transfer Resources, 1992-
1993.
See 1284
OSWER Source Book. Volume 2. Training
and Technology Transfer Resources, 1992-
1993.
See 1285
Overview of ERNS: Emergency Response
Notification System (ERNS) Fact Sheet.
See 0935
Overview of the Off-Site Policy for OSCs and
RPMs.
See 0433
Overview of the Outyear Liability Model
(OLM).
See 0106
Overview of the Outyear Liability Model
(OLM).
See 0107
PA-Score (Preliminary Assessment Score)
User's Manual and Tutorial. Version 2.1.
See 0367
PA-Score (Preliminary Assessment Score),
Version 1.0 (for Microcomputers).
See 0368
PA-Score Software, Version 1.0. Users
Manual and Tutorial.
See 0371
Performance of Risk Assessments in Reme-
dial Investigation/Feasibility Studies (Rl/
FSs) Conducted by Potentially Responsible
Parties (PRPs).
See 1102
Performance Tracking under ARCS Con-
tracts.
See 0061
Permits and Permit 'Equivalency' Processes
for CERCLA On-Site Response Actions.
See 0435
Policy for Enforcement Actions against
Transporters under CERCLA.
See 0584
Policy for Superfund Compliance with the
RCRA Land Disposal Restrictions.
See 0436
Policy on Floodplains and Wetland Assess-
ments for CERCLA Actions.
See 0437
Policy on Management of Post-Removal Site
Control.
See 1008
Policy on Recovering Indirect Cost in
CERCLA Section 107 Cost Recovery Ac-
tions.
See 0585
Policy Towards Owners of Residential Prop-
erty-at Superfund Sites.
See 0586
Political Subdivision Involvement in Super-
fund.
See 0479
Potential for Joint Research between EPA
and the U.S. Army.
See 1293
Preparation of Hazardous Waste Referrals.
See 0588
PREscore Software. Users Manual and Tuto-
rial. Version 1.0.
See 0374
Priority for Health and Safety Requirements,
Especially Medical Surveillance Require-
ments, for EPA Employees Who Support
OSWER Programs.
See 0923
Procedures for Documenting Costs for
CERCLA Section 107 Actions.
See 0590
Procedures for Transmittal of CERCLA and
RCRA Civil Judicial Enforcement Case Pack-
ages to Headquarters.
See 0591
Progress Toward Implementing Superfund,
Fiscal Year 1990: A Report to the Congress.
See 0301
Progress Toward Implementing Superfund,
Fiscal Year 1991. Report to Congress.
See 0302
Proposed Method to Evaluate the Effective-
ness of Community Involvement in Super-
fund (Superfund Management Review: Rec-
ommendation Number 43.A).
See 0109
PRP Search Supplemental Guidance for
Sites in the Superfund Remedial Program.
See 0592
Public Awareness Signs at Superfund Sites.
See 0481
Quality and Environmental Protection: The
EPA QA Program.
See 0990
Questions and Answers About the State
Role in Remedy Selection at Non-Fund-Fi-
nanced Enforcement Sites.
See 0482
Real Estate Acquisition Procedures for
USAGE Projects.
See 1133
Reassignment of CLP Transportation Func-
tions.
See 0063
Recent Advances in Risk Reduction Engi-
neering.
See 1064
Regional Guide: Issuing Site-Specific Treat-
ability Variances for Contaminated Soils and
Debris from Land Disposal Restrictions
(LDRs).
See 1528
Regional Oversight of Federal Facility Clean-
ups under CERCLA.
See 0900
Regional Pilot Projects and Initiatives.
See 0064
Regional Pilots and Applications of Super-
fund Accelerated Cleanup Model (SACM).
See 0110
Releasing Identities of Potentially Responsi-
ble Parties in Response to FOIA Requests.
See 0594
SU-118
-------
SUBJECT INDEX
WASTE MANAGEMENT
Releasing Information to Potentially Respon-
sible Parties at CERCLA Sites.
See 0595
Remedial Action Report: Documentation for
Operable Unit Completion.
See 1134
Remedial Investigation: Site Characterization
and Treatability Studies.
See 1106
Removal Cost Management System: Version
3.2.
See 1009
Report to Congress: Settlements with Munic-
ipal Waste Generators and Transporters
Since 1991 under the Comprehensive Envi-
ronmental Response, Compensation, and Li-
ability Act of 1980.
See 0596
Reporting and Exchange of Information on
State Enforcement Actions at National Prior-
ities List Sites.
See 0483
Reporting Requirements for Continuous Re-
leases of Hazardous Substances: A Guide
for Facilities and Vessels on Compliance.
See 1150
Asymmetric Loss Function for Superfund Re-
mediation Decisions.
See 1200
Bench-Scale Evaluation of Alternative Bio-
logical Treatment Processes for the Remedi-
ation of Pentachlorophenol- and Creosote-
Contaminated Materials: Solid-Phase Biore-
mediation.
See 1420
Control Technology: 1992 Update of U.S.
EPA's Superfund Innovative Technology
Evaluation (SITE) Emerging Technology Pro-
gram.
See 1223
Cost Estimating Systems for Remedial
Action Projects.
See 1123
Incineration Treatment of Arsenic-Contami-
nated Soil.
See 1268
Management Systems Review of the Super-
fund RI/FS: Opportunities for Streamlining.
See 1101
PAST: The Potential ARARs Selection Tool.
See 0434
Superfund Soils Data Management System.
See 1536
U.S. EPA SITE Demonstration of AWD Tech-
nologies' AquaDetox/SVE System.
See 1363
Revised EPA Guidance on Parallel Proceed-
ings.
See 0597
Revised Hazard Ranking System: An Im-
proved Tool for Screening Superfund Sites.
See 0377
Revised Hazard Ranking System: Back-
ground Information.
See 0378
Revised Hazard Ranking System: Qs and
As.
See 0381
Revised Hazardous Waste Bankruptcy Guid-
ance.
See 0598
Revised Hazardous Waste Bankruptcy Guid-
ance, October 7, 1991.
See 0599
Revised Policy on Discretionary Information
Release under CERCLA.
See 0600
Revised Procedures for Implementing Off-
Site Response Actions.
See 0601
Revision of Policy Regarding Superfund
Project Assignment between Alternative Re-
medial Contracting Strategy Contractors and
the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers.
See 0068
Revisions to the Interim Guidance on PRP
Participation in Remedial Investigations and
Feasibility Studies.
See 0603
RI/FS Streamlining.
See 1110
Risk Assessment Guidance for Superfund.
Volume 1. Human Health Evaluation Manual.
Part A, April 1990.
See 1066
Risk Assessment in Superfund: A Primer.
First Edition, September 1990.
See 1073
Role of Community Interviews in the Devel-
opment of a Community Relations Program
for Remedial Response.
See 0485
Role of Expedited Response Actions under
SARA.
See 1116
Roles and Responsibilities of Deputy Project
Officers and Work Assignment Managers
under the Technical Enforcement Support
(TES) Contracts.
See 0069
Roles and Responsibilities of Regional
Project Officers, Zone Project Officers, Work
Assignment Managers and Contracting Offi-
cers for the RCRA Enforcement, Permitting
and Assistance Contracts (REPA).
See 0070
Roles and Responsibilities of Regional
Project Officers and Headquarters Zone
Project Officers for Management of TES
(TES 5) Contracts.
See 0604
SACM Regional Decision Teams: Interim
Guidance. Volume 1, Number 5, December
1992.
See 0111
Sampler's Guide to the Contract Laboratory
Program.
See 0071
Scope of the CERCLA Petroleum Exclusion
under Sections 101(14) and 104(a)(2).
See 0605
Scoper's Notes: An RI/FS Costing Guide.
Bringing in a Quality RI/FS on Time and
Within Budget.
See 1117
Selection of Control Technologies for Reme-
diation of Lead Battery Recycling Sites. (En-
gineering Bulletin).
See 1298
Site Classification Changes from Enforce-
ment to Fund Lead.
See 0606
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)
(National).
See 0611
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)
(National) (for Microcomputers).
See 0613
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 1.
See 0740
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 2.
See 0745
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 3.
See 0749
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 4.
See 0754
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 5.
See 0759
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 6.
See 0764
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 7.
See 0769
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 8.
See 0774
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 9.
See 0779
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 10.
See 0784
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP National Listing Alphabetically by Party
Name.
See 0830
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP National Listing by Site.
See 0836
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)
(Region 1) (for Microcomputers).
See 0850
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)
(Region 2) (for Microcomputers).
See 0852
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)
(Region 3) (for Microcomputers).
See 0854
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)
(Region 4) (for Microcomputers).
See 0856
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)
(Region 5) (for Microcomputers).
See 0858
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)
(Region 6) (for Microcomputers).
See 0860
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)
(Region 7) (for Microcomputers).
See 0862
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)
(Region 8) (for Microcomputers).
See 0864
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)
(Region 9) (for Microcomputers).
See 0866
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)
(Region 10) (for Microcomputers).
See 0868
Site-Specific Contracting for Removals.
See 1011
Small Cost Recovery Referrals.
See 0869
Smart Moves in Superfund - Regional Initia-
tives. Volume 1, Number 1, February 1992.
See 0305
Smart Moves in Superfund - Regional Pilots
and Initiatives. Volume 1, Number 2, Sep-
tember 1992.
See 0306
Smart Moves in Superfund - Revitalization
One Year Later. Volume 1, Number 3, Janu-
ary 1993.
See 0307
Soil Washing Treatment.
See 1532
Status of Key SACM Program Management
Issues: Interim Guidance, Volume 1, Number
1, December 1992.
See 0113
Status of Regional Superfund Pilots: End-of-
Year Report.
See 0309
SU-119
-------
WASTE MANAGEMENT
IS'SlreamHnJng the RI/FS for CERCLA Munlci-
' pal Land (ill Sites.
'=;'§«« 1118
Streamlining tha Rl/FS (or CERCLA Munici-
pal Landfill Sites.
S®8 1119
ii Submittal of Ten-Point Settlement Analyses
(or CERCLA Consent Decrees.
!:J"Sa9087i ;.
Suggested ROD Language for Various
: Ground Water Remediation Options.
Sea 1475
Summary of 'Guidance of Landowner Liabil-
ity under Section 107(a)1 of CERCLA, De
MWmis Settlements under Section
122(gHD(b) ol CERCLA, and Settlements
with Prospective Purchasers of Contaminat-
«d Property'.
Sea 0872
Summary o( 'Guidance on CERCLA Section
106(8) UAOs for RD/RA'.
• SW0873
Summary of 'Guidance on Documenting be-
dskxis Not to Take Cost Recovery Actions'.
See 0874
Summary of 'Interim Guidance: Streamlining
th« CERCLA Settlement Decision Process'.
So« 0875
: Summary of 'Interim Guidelines for Preparing
..NBAfls1,
S08 0876
Summary of 'Interim Policy on CERCLA Set-
tlements Involving Municipalities and Munici-
pal Wastes'.
S»9 0877
Summary of 'Methodologies for Implementa-
tion of CERCLA Section 122(g)(1)(a) De
Minimis Waste Contributor Settlements'.
Sea 0878
Summary of 'Nbtificalbn of Out-of-State
Shipments of Superfund Site Wastes'.
Sea 0438
iii: Summary of 'PRP Search Supplemental
Guidance for Sites in the Superfund Remedi-
" *l Program'.
• ' Sea 0879
!:;, Summary ot 'Releasing Information to Poten-
;; ttalty Responsible Parties at CERCLA Sites'.
f Sea 0880
j.-i 'Superfund Accelerated Cleanup Bulletin:
i Presumptlya R"emedies"fPr Municipal Landfill
t'. .Sites. Volume 2," Number 1, February 1993.
!,'; See 0115 ,;~ I'
Suportund Accelerated Cleanup Bulletin:
' Presumptive Remedies for Wood Treatment
f Facllies. Volume; 1, 'Number 2, May 1992.
i" See 0116
• Superfund Accelerated Cleanup Bulletin.
, Volume 1, Number 3. Presumptive Reme-
• dies.
S«00118
Accelerated Cleanup Model
Coordlriilon Strategy.
0120"
Superfund Accelerated Cleanup Model
(SACM). Volume 1, Number 4, November
1992.
Sea 0122
Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Clean-
up Efforts Nationwide (Bog Creek Farm).
Sea 0940
Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Clean-
up Efforts Nationwide (City Industries).
Sea 0941
Suporfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Clean-
up Efforts Nationwide, Fall 1992. (American
Thormostat Corporation, New York).
Se«0942
Suporfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Clean-
up Efforts Nationwide, Fall 1992. (Celanese
Corporation Site> Profile)^
Sea 0943
SUBJECT INDEX
Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Clean-
up Efforts Nationwide, Fall 1992. (Ciba-Geigy
Corporation, Mclntosh, Alabama).
See 0944
Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Clean-
up Efforts Nationwide, Fall 1992. (Krysowaty
Farm, Hillsborough, New Jersey).
See 0945
Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Clean-
up Efforts Nationwide, Fall 1992. (Valley of
the Drums, Bullitt County, Kentucky).
See 0947
Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Clean-
up Efforts Nationwide, Fall 1992. (Wide
Beach Section of Brant, New York).
See 0948
Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Clean-
up Efforts Nationwide, Fall 1993 (Big D
Campground Site Profile, Ashtabula County,
Kingsville, Ohio).
See 0949
Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Clean-
up Efforts Nationwide, Fall 1993 (Brown
Wood Preserving Site Profile, Suwanee
County, Florida).
See 0950
Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Clean-
up Efforts Nationwide (McKin Company).
See 0953
Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Clean-
up Efforts Nationwide, Spring 1993 (Triana/
Tennessee River Site, Alabama).
See 0960
Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Clean-
up Efforts Nationwide, Spring 1993 (United
Chrome Products Site Profile).
See 0961
Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Clean-
up Efforts Nationwide, Summer 1993 (Coal
Creek Site Profile, Chehalis, Washington).
See 0964
Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Clean-
up Efforts Nationwide, Summer 1993 (Tri-
State Plating Site Profile, Columbus, Indi-
ana).
See 0970
Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Clean-
up Efforts Nationwide (White Chemical).
See 0971
Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Clean-
up Efforts Nationwide, Winter 1993. (Wells G
and H Site, Woburn, Massachusetts).
See 0972
Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Clean-
up Efforts Nationwide, Winter 1994 (New
Brighton Site Profile, Minneapolis/St. Paul,
Minnesota).
See 0974
Superfund Cost Recovery Strategy.
See 0882
Superfurid Desk Reference for Municipali-
ties.
See 0486
Superfund Docket Operations Manual for
Rulemaking Activities.
See 0081
Superfund Emergency Response Actions: A
Summary of Federally-Funded Removals.
Fifth Annual Report - Fiscal Year 1990.
See 0313
Superfund Emergency Response Actions: A
Summary of Federally Funded Removals.
Fourth Annual Report - Fiscal Year 1989.
See 0314
Superfund Emergency Response Actions: A
Summary of Federally-Funded Removals.
Sixth Annual Report, Fiscal Year 1991.
See 0315
Superfund Emergency Response Actions: A
Summary of Federally Funded Removals.
Volume 3.
See 0318
Superfund Enforcement Strategy and
mentation Plan.
See 0883
Superfund Engineering Issue: Considerations
for Evaluating the Impact of Metals Partition-
ing during the Incineration of Contaminated
Soils from Superfund Sites.
See 1534
Superfund: EPA/ICMA Superfund Revitaliza-
tion Conference. Held in Chicago, Illinois on
November 12-13, 1992.
See 0319
Superfund: EPA/ICMA Superfund Revitaliza-
tion Conference. Held in San Francisco,
California on February 1-2, 1993.
See 0320
Superfund Information Repositories and Ad-
ministrative Records.
See 0884
Superfund Innovative Technology Evaluation
Program: Progress and Accomplishments,
Fiscal 'Year 1989. A Third Report to Con-
gress.
See 1311
Superfund Innovative Technology Evaluation
Program: Technology Profiles, Fourth Edi-
tion.
See 1316
Superfund Innovative Technology Evaluation
Program: Technology Profiles, November
1989.
See 1317
Superfund LDR Guide No. 1: Overview of
RCRA Land Disposal Restrictions (LDRs).
See 0440
Superfund LDR Guide No. 2: Complying with
the California List Restrictions under Land
Disposal Restrictions (LDRs).
See 0441
Superfund LDR Guide No. 3: Treatment
Standards and Minimum Technology Re-
quirements under Land Disposal Restrictions
(LDRS).
See 0442
Superfund LDR Guide No. 4: Complying with
the Hammer Restrictions under Land Dis-
posal Restrictions (LDRs).
See 0443
Superfund LDR Guide No. 5: Determining
When Land Disposal Restrictions (LDRs) Are
'Applicable' to CERCLA Response Actions.
See 0444
Superfund LDR Guide No. 6A (2nd Edition)
Obtaining a Soil and Debris Treatability Vari-
ance for Remedial Actions.
See 0445
Superfund LDR Guide No. 7. Determining
When Land Disposal Restrictions (LDRs) Are
Relevant and Appropriate to CERCLA Re-
sponse Actions.
See 0446
Superfund Program Implementation Manual,
Fiscal Year 1994. Volume 1. Program Goals
and Planning Requirements. Volume 2. Pro-
gram Implementation Procedures.
See 0124
Superfund Program Management Manual,
Fiscal Year 1994.
See 0073
Superfund Progress. Aficionado's Version.
Progress as of September 30, 1992.
See 0327
Superfund Progress: Fall/Winter 1992.
See 0328
Superfund: Qualified Disadvantaged Busi-
ness Utilization in State Response.
See 0498
Superfund Reform Act of 1994.
See 0332
SU-120
r
-------
SUBJECT INDEX
WASTE TREATMENT
Superfund Remedial Program Financial Man-
agement Authority, Responsibilities and Pro-
cedures.
See 1137
Superfund Removal Procedures: Action
Memorandum Guidance.
See 1012
Superfund: Report of the EPA Superfund
Revitalization Public Meeting Held on June
24,1992. Volumes 1 and 2.
See 0333
Superfund Response Action Contracts.
See 0074
Superfund Responsiveness Summaries (Su-
perfund Management Review: Recommen-
dation Number 43E).
See 0125
Superfund Revitalization: Measures of Suc-
cess.
See 0334
Superfund Technical Assistance Grant
(TAG) Handbook.
See 0499
Superfund Technical Assistance Grants.
See 0502
Superfund Technical Assistance Grants
(Fact Sheet).
See 0503
Superfund Technical Assistance Grants
(TAGs) (Pamphlet).
See 0505
Supplemental Guidance on Federal Super-
fund Liens.
See 0885
Supplemental Guidance on Performing Risk
Assessments in Remedial Investigation/Fea-
sibility Studies (RI/FSs). Conducted by Po-
tentially Responsible Parties (PRPs).
See 1078
Supplemental Guidance to RAGS: Calculat-
ing the Concentration Term. Volume 1,
Number 1, May 1992.
See 1079
Supporting State Attorneys General
CERCLA Remedial and Enforcement Activi-
ties at NPL Sites.
See 0506
Technical Guidance Document: Construction
Quality Management for Remedial Action
and Remedial Design Waste Containment
Systems.
See 1334
Technical Resource Document: Solidifica-
tion/Stabilization and Its Application to
Waste Materials.
See 1565
Technology Demonstration Summary: Bio
Trol Soil Washing System for Treatment of a
Wood Preserving Site.
See 1538
Technology Evaluation Report: Babcock and
Wilcox Cyclone Furnace Vitrification Tech-
nology. Volume 1.
See 1337
Technology Evaluation Report: Babcock and
Wilcox Cyclone Furnace Vitrification Tech-
nology. Volume 2.
See 1338
Technology Evaluation Report: Biotrol Soil
Washing System for Treatment of a Wood
• Preserving Site. Volume 1.
See 1539
Technology Evaluation Report: Biotrol Soil
Washing System for Treatment of a Wood
Preserving Site. Volume 2, Part A.
See 1540
Technology Evaluation Report: Biotrol Soil
Washing System for Treatment of a Wood
Preserving Site. Volume 2, Part B.
See 1541
Technology Transfer Needs Assessment,
1990.
See 1354
Terra Vac In situ Vacuum Extraction System:
Applications Analysis Report.
See 1355
Timely Initiation of Responsible Party
Searches, Issuance of Notice Letters, and
Release of Information (Attachment XXII).
See 0886
Total Quality Management (TQM) and Qual-
ity Assurance (QA) in Superfund.
See 0996
Toxic Treatments 'In-situ' Steam/Hot-Air
Stripping Technology. Applications Analysis
Report.
See 1545
Toxicological Assessment of Hazardous
Wastes.
See 1358
Tracking Toxic Substances at Industrial Fa-
cilities: Engineering Mass Balance versus
Materials Accounting.
See 1362
Transmittal of Guidance on Use and En-
forcement of CERCLA Information Requests
and Administrative Subpoenas.
See 0887
Transmittal of Model Consent Decree for
CERCLA Section 104(e) Information Re-
quest Enforcement Actions.
See 0888
Transmittal of the Final Waste Oil Interim
• Enforcement Guidance Document.
See 0889
Treatability Studies Contractor Work Assign-
ments.
See 0076
Treatability Studies Under CERCLA: An
Overview.
See 1172
U.S. Bureau of Reclamation Assistance to
the Superfund Program.
See 1138
Understanding Superfund Risk Assessment.
See 0508
United States Environmental Protection
Agency Model CERCLA RD/RA Consent
Decree.
See 0890
USAGE Preplaced and Rapid Response
Contracts.
See 1139
Use of CERCLA Section 106 Unilateral En-
forcement for Remedial Design and Remedi-
al Action: Strategy for Fiscal Year 1990.
See 0891
Use of Removal Approaches to Speed Up
Remedial Action Projects.
See 1140
Use of Time and Materials and Cost Reim-
bursement Subcontracts for Remedial Ac-
tions under the Alternative Remedial Con-
tracting Strategy Contracts.
See 1141
USEPA Contract Laboratory Program Nation-
al Functional Guidelines for Inorganic Data
Review.
See 0997
User's Guide to the Contract Laboratory Pro-
gram.
See 0079
Written Demand for CERCLA Cost Recov-
ery.
See 0894
Written Demand for Recovery of Costs In-
curred Under the Comprehensive Environ-
mental Response, Compensation, and Liabil-
ity Act (CERCLA).
See 0895
WASTE PROCESSING
Bioremediation Resource Guide and Biore-
mediation Resource Matrix.
See 1425
WASTE REMOVAL
. HSED SACM Report. Volume 1, Number 1,
January 1993.
See 0096
Model Administrative Order on Consent for
Removal Actions.
See 0574
Model Unilateral Administrative Order for Re-
moval Response Activities.
See 0579
WASTE STORAGE
Sector Sampling for VOC's during Remedi-
ation of Superfund Site at Shaver's Farm,
Georgia.
See 1417
WASTE TREATMENT
Abstract Proceedings: Forum on Innovative
Hazardous Waste Treatment Technologies;
Domestic and International (2nd). Held in
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania on May 15-17,
1990.
See 1186
Advancing the Use of Treatment Technol-
ogies for Superfund Remedies.
See 1191
Air Stripping of Aqueous Solutions. Engineer-
ing Bulletin.
See 1371
Air/Superfund National Technical Guidance
Study Series. Emission Factors for Super-
fund Remediation Technologies.
See 1381
Applications Analysis Report: Silicate Tech-
nology Corporation's Solidification/Stabiliza-
tion Technology for Organic and Inorganic
Contaminants in Soils.
See 1550
Biological Treatment of Wood Preserving
Site Groundwater by BioTrol, Inc. Applica-
tions Analysis Report.
See 1433
Carver-Greenfield Process (Trade Name)
Dehydro-Tech Corporation. Applications
Analysis Report.
See 1207
Chemfix Technologies, Inc. Solidification/
Stabilization Process. Application Analysis
Report.
See 1551
Chemical Dehalogenation Treatability Stud-
ies under CERCLA: An Overview.
See 1153
Chemical Dehalogenation Treatment: APEG
Treatment.
See 1210
Chemical Oxidation Treatment. Engineering
Bulletin.
See 1211
Chemical Waste Management, Inc.
PO*WW*ER (Trade Name) Evaporation-
Catalytic Oxidation Technology. Technology
Evaluation Report. Volume 1.
See 1213
Chemical Waste Management, Inc.
PO*WW*ER (Trade Name) Evaporation-
Catalytic Oxidation Technology. Technology
Evalution Report. Volume 2.
See 1214
Citizen's Guide to How Innovative Treatment
Technologies Are Being Successfully Ap-
plied at Superfund Sites.
See 0455
Citizen's Guide to Solvent Extraction.
See 0459
SU-121
-------
WftSTE TREATMENT
SUBJECT INDEX
Citizen's Guide to Thermal Desorption.
Sea 0460
Compliance with Third Third Requirements
'•'• Under the LDRs. Superfund LDR Guide No.
=:8.
Sue 0418
Control Technologies for Defunct lead Bat-
tery Recycling Sites: Overview and Recent
Developments. Volume 3.
See 1220
Covenants Not to Sue under SARA.
Sea 0526
CWM PO'WW'ER (Trade Name) Evapora-
tion-Catalytic Oxidation Technology: Applica-
Jlif jtotjs. Analysis Report.
Sea 1225
«; Demonstration of a Trial Excavation at the
1 McColl Supeifund Site.
Sea 1226
Demonstration of Waste Treatment Technol-
ogies.
Sao 1229
Developments In Chemical Treatment of
Contaminated Soil.
See 1499
Engineering Bulletin: Pyrolysis Treatment
See 1234
Engineering Bulletin: Slurry Walls.
Sea 1235
Engineering Bulletin: Technology Preselec-
•i (Ion Data Requirements.
I!:'." Sea 1405
Evaluating Mixed Funding Settlements under
i'.CERCLA.
Sea 0537
I"; EvaluaHorj of Alternative, Treatment Technol-
ogies for CERCLA Soils and Debris (Summa-
ry of Phase 1 and Phase 2).
i; Sea 1504
'" Evaluatkjj} of GigurK^Water^ Extraction Rem-
, i'edtes. yoibma'arCase'Studles''.!-!^.
p see 1446;. ; ~ l"I ', ,,,', !
Iri Forum on Innovative Hazardous Waste
I Treatment Techhotogjes: Domestic and
International Held In Atlanta, Georgia on
June 19-21,1989. Abstract Proceedings.
; See 1252
Forum on Innovative Hazardous Waste
Treatment Technologies: Domestic and
International. Held in Atlanta, Georgia on
June 19-21,1989. Technical Papers.
5*41253
Forum on Innovative Hazardous Waste
:: Treatment Technologies (3rd): Domestic and
International, Held In Dallas, Texas on June
11-13,1991. Technical Papers.
Sea 1254
Furthering the Use of Innovative Treatment
• Technologies in OSWER Programs.
See 1255
Furthering the Use of Innovative Treatment
Technologies in OSWER Programs.
See 1256
Granular Activated Carbon Treatment. Engi-
ii Hearing Bulletin.
S«» 1258 ;
Guide for Conducting Testability Studies
under CERCLA.
See 1155
Guide for Conducting Treatability Studies
under CERCLA: Soil Vapor Extraction. Inter-
im Guidance.
See 1163
Guide to Discharging CERCLA Aqueous
Wastes to Publicly Owned Treatment Works
(POTWs),
See 0423
Guide to Obtaining No Migration Variances
for CERCLA Remedial Actions.
See 6424
Horsehead Resource Development Compa-
ny, Inc. Flame Reactor Technology: Applica-
tions Analysis Report.
See 1263
Horsehead Resource Development Compa-
ny, Inc., Flame Reactor Technology. Tech-
nology Demonstration Summary.
See 1264
Immobilization Technology Seminar: Speaker
Slide Copies and Supporting Information.
See 1555
Innovative Operational Treatment Technol-
ogies for Application to Superfund Site: Nine
Case Studies.
See 1269
Innovative Technology: Slurry-Phase Biode-
gradation.
See 1271
Innovative Treatment Technologies: Over-
view and Guide to Information Sources.
See 1272
Innovative Treatment Technologies: Semi-
Annual Status Report (Fourth Edition).
See 1273
Innovative Treatment Technologies: Semi-
Annual Status Report, January 1991. First
Issue.
See 1274
Innovative Treatment Technologies: Semi-
Annual Status Report. (Third Edition).
See 1275
Interim Guidance on Notice Letters, Negotia-
tions, and Information Exchange.
See 0560
Interim Policy on Mixed Funding Settlements
Involving the Preauthorizatlon of States or
Political Subdivisions.
See 0566
Interim RCRA/CERCLA Guidance on Non-
Contiguous Sites and On-Site Management
on Waste and Treatment Residue.
See 0427
International Waste Technologles/Geo-Con
In situ Stabilization/Solidification: Applica-
tions Analysis Report.
See 1557
Inventory of Treatability Study Vendors.
Volume 1.
See 1171
Literature Survey of Innovative Technologies
for Hazardous Waste Site Remediation,
1987-1991.
See 1281
Long-Term Contracting Strategy for Super-
fund - Implementation.
See 0043
Methodologies for Implementation of
CERCLA Section 122(g) (1) (A) De Minimis
Waste Contributor Settlements Proposals
and Agreements.
See 0572
Mobile/Transportable Incineration Treat-
ment
See 1481
Model Notice Letters.
See 0577
Obtaining a Soil and Debris Treatability Vari-
ance for Removal Actions. Superfund LDR
Guide No. 6B.
See 0430
Physical/Chemical Treatment of Hazardous
Waste Sites: Speaker Slide Copies and Sup-
porting Information.
See 1287
Pilot-Scale Demonstration of a Slurry-Phase
Biological Reactor for Creosote-Contaminat-
ed Soil. Applications Analysis Report.
See 1426
Pilot-Scale Incineration of Contaminated
Sludges from the Bofors-Nobel Superfund
Site.
See 1289
Pilot-Scale' Incineration of Contaminated Soil
from the Purity Oil Sales and McColl Super-
fund Sites.
See 1290
Procuring Innovative Technologies at Reme-
dial Sites: Q's and A's and Case Studies.
See 1132
Prospects for In situ Chemical Treatment for
Contaminated Soil.
See 1525
Remedial Action, Treatment, and Disposal of
Hazardous Waste. Proceedings of the
Annual Hazardous Waste Research Sympo-
sium (17th). Held in Cincinnati, Ohio on April
9-11,1991.
See 1135
Remedial Investigation: Site Characterization
and Treatability Studies.
See 1106
Alternating Current Electrocoagulation for
Superfund Site Remediation.
See 1192
Chemical Stabilization of Mixed Organic and
Metal Compounds. EPA SITE Program Dem-
onstration of the Silicate Technology Corpo-
ration Process.
See 1212
Control Technology: Estimating Innovative
Technology Costs for the SITE Program.
See 1222
Demonstration of Hazardous Waste Site
Treatment Technologies.
See 1227
Demonstration of Microfiltration Technology.
See 1228
Demonstration Projects Under the U.S. EPA
Superfund Innovative Technology Evaluation
Program.
See 1230
Description of EPA SITE Demonstration of
the HAZCON Stabilization Process at the
Douglassvllle, Pennsylvania Superfund Site.
See 1552
EPA SITE Demonstration of the Horsehead
Resource Development Company Flame Re-
actor Technology.
See 1242
Evaluation of Waste Stabilized by the Solidi-
tech SITE Technology.
See 1554
Factors Affecting the Applicability of Plasma
Systems to the Cleanup of Superfund Sites.
See 1250
Results from the Stabilization Technologies
Evaluated by the Site Program. New Eng-
land Environmental Expo 90.
See 1558
SITE Demonstration of the CF Systems Or-
ganics Extraction System.
See 1301
SITE Demonstration of the CHEMFIX Solidi-
fication/Stabilization Process at the Portable
Equipment Salvage Company Site.
See 1559
Solidification/Stabilization: Is It Always Ap-
propriate.
See 1560
Solvent Extraction Processes: A Survey of
Systems in the SITE Program.
See 1305
Sorption, Important in Stabilized/Solidified
Waste Forms.
See 1563
Resources for Preparing Independent Gov-
ernment Estimates for Remedial Contracting
Work Assignments.
See 0066
ROD Annual Report, FY 1989.
See 1111
SU-122
-------
SUBJECT INDEX
WATER POLLUTION
Rotating Biological Contactors. Engineering
Bulletin.
See 1297
Selection of Control Technologies for Reme-
diation of Lead Battery Recycling Sites. (En-
gineering Bulletin).
See 1298
SITE Emerging Technologies Project: Bab-
cock and Wilcox Cyclone Vitrification.
See 1303
Slurry Biodegradation.
See 1428
Solidification/Stabilization of Organics and
Inorganics.
See 1561
Solvent Extraction Treatment.
See 1306
Summary of Treatment Technology Effec-
tiveness for Contaminated Soil.
See 1533
Superfund Engineering Issue: Treatment of
Lead-Contaminated Soils.
See 1535
Superfund Innovative Technology Evaluation
Program: Progress and Accomplishments,
Fiscal Year 1989. A Third Report to Con-
gress.
See 1311
Superfund Innovative Technology Evaluation
Program: Progress and Accomplishments,
Fiscal Year 1990. A Fourth Report to Con-
gress.
See 1312
Superfund Innovative Technology Evaluation
Program: Progress and Accomplishments
Fiscal Year 1991. A 5th Report to Congress.
See 1313
Superfund Innovative Technology Evaluation
Program: Spring Update to the Technology
Profiles. Fourth Edition.
See 1314
Superfund Innovative Technology Evaluation
Program: Technology Profiles, Fifth Edition.
See 1315
Superfund Innovative Technology Evaluation
Program: Technology Profiles, Sixth Edition.
See 1318
Superfund Innovative Technology Evaluation
(SITE): Demonstration Bulletin. Flame Reac-
tor, Horsehead Resource Development
Company, Inc.
See 1319
Superfund Innovative Technology Evaluation
Technology Demonstration Summary: Chem-
fix Solidification/Stabilization Process, Clack-
amas, Oregon.
See 1564
Superfund LDR Guide No. 3: treatment
Standards and Minimum Technology Re-
quirements under Land Disposal Restrictions
(LDRS).
See 0442
Superfund LDR Guide No. 6A (2nd Edition)
Obtaining a Soil and Debris Treatability Vari-
ance for Remedial Actions.
See 0445
Synopses of Federal Demonstrations of In-
novative Site Remediation Technologies.
See 1324
Tech Trends (Number 10).
See 1330
Tech Trends: The Applied Technologies
Journal for Superfund Removals and Reme-
dial Actions and RCRA Corrective Actions.
May 1993.
See 1333
Technical Resource Document: Solidifica-
tion/Stabilization and Its Application to
Waste Materials.
See 1565
Technology Evaluation Report CHEMFIX
Technologies, Inc., Solidification/Stabiliza-
tion Process, Clackamas, Oregon. Volume 2.
See 1339
Technology Evaluation Report: Chemfix
Technologies, Inc. Solidification/Stabilization
Process, Clackamas, Oregon. Volume 1.
See 1566
Technology Evaluation Report: International
Waste Technologies/Geo-Con In situ Stabili-
zation/Solidification. Volume 3. Update
Report.
See 1567
Technology Evaluation Report: International
Waste Technologies/Geo-Con In situ Stabili-
zation/Solidification. Volume 4. Update
Report.
See 1568
Technology Evaluation Report of Retech's
Plasma Centrifugal Furnace. Volume 1.
See 1342
Technology Evaluation Report of Retech's
Plasma Centrifugal Furnace. Volume 2.
See 1343
Technology Evaluation Report: Ogden Circu-
lating Bed Combustor at the McColl Super-
fund Site.
See 1344
Technology Evaluation Report: Perox-Pure
(Trade Name) Chemical Oxidation Technolo-
gy-
See 1345
Technology Evaluation Report: Pilot-Scale
Demonstration of a Slurry-Phase Biological
Reactor for Creosote-Contaminated Soil.
Volume 1.
See 1542
Technology Evaluation Report: Site Program
Demonstration of a Trial Excavation at the
McColl Superfund Site.
See 1349
Technology Evaluation Report: SITE Pro-
gram Demonstration Test, Soliditech, Inc.,
Solidification/Stabilization Process. Volume
1.
See 1570
Technology Evaluation Report: SITE Pro-
gram Demonstration Test, Soliditech, Inc.
Solidification/Stabilization Process. Volume
2.
See 1571
Thermal Desorption Treatment.
See 1357
Thermal Desorption Treatment (February
1994).
See 1487
Toronto Harbour Commissioners (THC) Soil
Recycle Treatment Train. Applications Analy-
sis Report.
See 1544
Treatability Studies Contractor Work Assign-
ments.
See 0076
Treatability Studies Under CERCLA: An
Overview.
See 1172
Understanding Bioremediation: A Guidebook
for Citizens.
See 0507
Vendor Information Form to be Completed
for Participation in the: Vendor Information
System for Innovative Treatment Technol-
ogies (VISITT).
See 1369
Waiver of Headquarters Approval for Issu-
ance of RD/RA Special Notice Letters at the
Time of ROD Signature from OERR and
OWPE.
See 0893
WASTE WATER
Discharge of Wastewater from CERCLA
Sites into POTWS.
See 0421
Ultrox International Ultraviolet Radiation/Oxi-
dation Technology: Applications Analysis
Report.
See 1364
WASTE WATER DISPOSAL
CERCLA Site Discharges to POTWs: Guid-
ance Manual.
See 1576
WASTES (INDUSTRIAL)
Cleaning Up the Nation's Waste Sites: Mar-
kets and Technology Trends.
See 0132
WATER ANALYSIS
Filtration of Ground Water Samples for
Metals Analysis.
See 1454
WATER CHEMISTRY
Metals Testing Report: Metal Content of En-
vironmental Samples from Region 4.
See 1282
Development and Use of Site-Specific
Chemical and Biological Criteria for Assess-
ing New Bedford Harbor Pilot Dredging
Project.
See 1583
WATER FLOW
Evaluation of Unsaturated/Valdose Zone
Models for Superfund Sites.
See 1449
Identification and Compilation of Unsaturat-
ed/Vadose Zone Models.
See 1464
WATER LEVELS
Superfund Ground Water Issue: Accuracy of
Depth to Water Measurements. 2nd in
Series of Issue Papers.
See 1476
WATER POLLUTION
Abstract Proceedings: Superfund Technical
Support Project General Meeting. Held in
Athens, Georgia on December 3-6, 1990.
See 1187
Achieving Greater Consistency between
Subjective and Objective Risks.
See 1017
ARARs Q's and A's Compliance with New
SDWA National Primary Drinking Water Reg-
ulations for Organic and Inorganic Chemi-
cals.
See 0400
CERCLA Site Discharges to POTWs: Guid-
ance Manual.
See 1576
Engineering Bulletin: Technology Preselec-
tion Data Requirements.
See 1405
EPA/ORD (Environmental Protection
Agency/Office of Research and Develop-
ment) Role and Perspective in Sediment Re-
search.
See 1585
Evaluating Amphibian Responses in Wet-
lands Impacted by Mining Activities in the
Western United States.
See 1586
Facilitated Transport. Series of Issue Papers
(3rd).
See 1451
Ground-Water Issue: The Effects of Well
Casing Material on Ground Water-Quality.
See 1457
SU-123
-------
WATER POLLUTION ABATEMENT
SUBJECT INDEX
Ground Water Sampling for Metals Analyses.
Suoof'und Ground Water Issue.
S
-------
SUBJECT INDEX
WOOD PRESERVATIVES
Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Clean-
up Efforts Nationwide, Spring 1993 (Harvey
and Knott Drum Site, New Castle County,
Delaware).
See 0956
Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Clean-
up Efforts Nationwide, Spring 1993 (Triana/
Tennessee River Site, Alabama).
See 0960
Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Clean-
up Efforts Nationwide, Summer 1993 (Tri-
State Plating Site Profile, Columbus, Indi-
ana).
See 0970
Technology Demonstration Summary,
DuPont/Oberlin Microfiltration System, Pal-
merton, Pennsylvania. April-May 1992.
See 1336
Technology Evaluation Report: Perox-Pure
(Trade Name) Chemical Oxidation Technolo-
gy-
See 1345
Technology Evaluation Report: SITE Pro-
gram. CF Systems Organics Extraction
System, New Bedford, Massachusetts.
Volume 1.
See 1346
Technology Evaluation Report: SITE Pro-
gram. CF Systems Organics Extraction
System, New Bedford, Massachusetts.
Volume 2.
See 1347
Technology Evaluation Report: SITE Pro-
gram Demonstration of the DuPont/Oberlin
Microfiltration Technology.
See 1350
Technology Evaluation Report: SITE Pro-
gram Demonstration of the Ultrox Interna-
tional Ultraviolet Radiation/Oxidation Tech-
nology.
See 1351
Terra Vac In situ Vacuum Extraction System:
Applications Analysis Report.
See 1355
WATER POLLUTION CONTROL EQUIPMENT
Air/Superfund National Technical Guidance
Study Series. Air Stripper Design Manual.
See 1374
Air/Superfund National Technical Guidance
Study Series. Comparisons of Air Stripper
Simulations and Field Performance Data.
See 1376
WATER POLLUTION DETECTION
Filtration of Ground Water Samples for
Metals Analysis.
See 1454
Superfund Innovative Technology Evaluation
(SITE) Program Evaluation Report for Antox
BTX Water Screen (BTX Immunoassay).
See 1320
WATER POLLUTION EFFECTS
Application of a Water Quality Assessment
Modeling System at a Superfund Site.
See 1573
Criteria for Choosing Indicator Species for
Ecological Risk Assessments at Superfund
Sites (90-6402).
See 1224
Exxon Valdez Oil Spill. A Report to the
President.
See 0928
Handbook: Responding to Discharges of
Sinking Hazardous Substances.
See 1589
Detoxification of Pentachlorophenol and Cre-
osote Contaminated Groundwater by Physi-
cal Extraction: Chemical and Biological As-
sessment.
See 1438
Understanding Oil Spills and Oil Spill Re-
sponse.
See 0978
WATER POLLUTION EFFECTS (ANIMALS)
Acid Volatile Sulfide Predicts the Acute Tox-
icity of Cadmium and Nickel in Sediments.
See 1572
Using the DNA Alkaline Unwinding Assay to
Detect DNA Damage in Laboratory and Envi-
ronmentally Exposed Cells and Tissues.
See 1368
WATER POLLUTION MONITORING
Application of 'Real-Time' Monitoring in De-
cision Making: The New Bedford Harbor
Pilot Dredging Project.
See 1574
WATER POLLUTION SAMPLING
Chemical Waste Management, Inc.
PO*WW*ER (Trade Name) Evaporation-
Catalytic Oxidation Technology. Technology
Evalution Report. Volume 2.
See 1214
Framework for Real-Time Decision-Making:
New Bedford Harbor Pilot Dredging Study.
See 1587
Ground-Water Issue: Potential Sources of
Error in Ground-Water Sampling at Hazard-
ous Waste Sites.
See 1456
Filtration of Ground Water Samples for
Metals Analysis.
See 1454
WATER POLLUTION STANDARDS
Presentations EPA-State Soil Standards
Conference. Held in Crystal City, Virginia on
January 29,1991.
See 1524
WATER QUALITY
Application of a Water Quality Assessment
Modeling System at a Superfund Site.
See 1573
ARARS Q's and A's: Compliance with Fed-
eral Water Quality Criteria.
See 0399
ARARs Q's and A's Compliance with New
SDWA National Primary Drinking Water Reg-
ulations for Organic and Inorganic Chemi-
cals.
See 0400
WATER QUALITY MANAGEMENT
Development and Use of Site-Specific
Chemical and Biological Criteria for Assess-
ing New Bedford Harbor Pilot Dredging
Project.
See 1583
Superfund Ground Water Issue: Accuracy of
Depth to Water Measurements. 2nd in
Series of Issue Papers.
See 1476
WATER TREATMENT
CERCLA Site Discharges to POTWs: Guid-
ance Manual.
See 1576
Performance Evaluations of Pump-and-Treat
Remediations.
See 1471
Field Evaluation of the UV/Oxidation Tech-
'nology to Treat Contaminated Groundwater.
Proceedings of the National Conference
(10th). Held in Washington, DC. on Novem-
ber 27-29, 1989.
See 1453
Small Systems Meet Superfund Challenge
with Point-of-Entry Treatment Units.
See 1304
Ultrox International Ultraviolet Radiation/Oxi-
dation Technology: Applications Analysis
Report.
See 1364
WATER WELLS
Ground-Water Issue: The Effects of Well
Casing Material on Ground Water-Quality.
See 1457
Tech Trends (Number 8).
See 1328
WEST VIRGINIA
National Priorities List Sites: West Virginia.
See 0288
National Priorities List Sites: West Virginia.
See 0289
National Priorities List Sites: West Virginia,
1992.
See 0290
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for West Virginia.
See 0816
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for West Virginia.
See 0817
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for West Virginia.
See 0818
WESTINGHOUSE
Superfund Innovative Technology Evaluation
Program Demonstration Plan for Westing-
house Bio-Analytic Systems Pentachloro-
phenol Immunoassays.
See 1310
WETLANDS
Evaluating Amphibian Responses in Wet-
lands Impacted by Mining Activities in the
Western United States.
See 1586
Handbook for Constructed Wetlands Receiv-
ing Acid Mine Drainage.
See 1588
WIMER (OREGON)
Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Clean-
up Efforts Nationwide, Summer 1993 (Rogue
Valley/Ditch Creek Ranch Site Profile,
Wimer, Oregon).
See 0969
WISCONSIN
National Priorities List Sites: Wisconsin.
See 0291
National Priorities List Sites: Wisconsin.
See 0292
National Priorities List Sites: Wisconsin,
1992.
See 0293
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Wisconsin.
See 0819
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Wisconsin.
See 0820
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Wisconsin.
See 0821
WOOD PRESERVATIVES
Biological Treatment of Wood Preserving
Site Groundwater by BioTrol, Inc. Applica-
tions Analysis Report.
See 1433
BioTrol Soil Washing System for Treatment
of a Wood Preserving Site: Applications
Analysis Report.
See 1492
Application of Tradescantia Micronucleus
Assay for In situ Evaluation of Potential Ge-
netic Hazards from Exposure to Chemicals
at a Wood-Preserving Site.
See 1195
SU-125
-------
WOOD PRODUCTS INDUSTRY
it i1 in, i ' , i • nil!'1.' „ " i
SUBJECT INDEX
Chemical Stabilization of Mixed Organic and
Metal Compounds. EPA SITE Program Dem-
onstration ol the Silicate Technology Corpo-
ration Process.
See 1212
:! EPA SITE Demonstration of the BioTrol Soil
Washing Process.
See 1502
< Suporfund Accelerated Cleanup Bulletin:
Presumptive Remedies for Wood Treatment
Facilities. Volume 1, Number 2, May 1992.
See 0116
Technology Evaluation Report: Btotrol Soil
Washing System for Treatment of a Wood
Preserving Site. Volume 1.
50*1539
Technology Evaluation Report: Biotrol Soil
Washing System for Treatment of a Wood
Preserving Sits. Volume 2. Part A.
s«« 1540 .;;;;" ".^
II Technology Evaluation Report: Biotrol Soil
'Washing System for Treatment of a Wood
j Preserving Site, Volume 2, Part B.
I See 1541 '^ ~~[ '"'^
" Technology Evaluation Report SITE Pro-
gram Demonstration. EPA RREL's Mobile
Volume Reduction Unit
Sea 1348
Technology Selection Guide for Wood Treat-
er Sites.
See 1122
WOOD PRODUCTS INDUSTRY
Evaluation of Emission Factors for Formal-
dehyde from Certain Wood Processing Oper-
ations. Final Report, May-August 1989.
See 1410
WOOD TREATMENT FACILITIES
Superfund Accelerated Cleanup Bulletin:
Presumptive Remedies for Wood Treatment
Facilities. Volume 1, Number 2, May 1992.
See 0116
WORK SCOPE
ECO Update. Volume 1, Number 4. Develop-
ing a Work Scope for Ecological Assess-
ments.
See 1022
WORKERS
Standard Operating Safety Guides.
See 0924
WYOMING
National Priorities List Sites: Wyoming.
See 0294
National Priorities List Sites: Wyoming.
See 0295
National Priorities List Sites: Wyoming, 1992.
See 0296
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Wyoming.
See 0822
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Wyoming.
See 0823
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Wyoming.
See 0824
X-RAY FLUORESCENCE ANALYSIS
X-ray Fluorescence Survey of Lead Contami-
nated Residential Soils in Leadville, Colora-
do: A Case Study.
See 1549
XYLENES
Health Effects Assessment for Xylenes.
See 1049
YORK COUNTY (VIRGINIA)
Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Clean-
up Efforts Nationwide, Summer 1993 (Chis-
man Creek Site Profile, York County, Virgin-
ia).
See 0963
ZINC
Technology Demonstration Summary,
DuPont/Oberlin Microfiltration System, Pal-
merton, Pennsylvania. April-May 1992.
See 1336
SU-126
li | .: ,,,; lift1 :• ; ; . i|f;
ill i •• ..... iii:: , ........ i tiir ,;, ....... • ....... •. , JiiiiiL ii,^
...... in ....... iSiaai ...... b;,, ..... ...... iti, ......... fe!:i,:iiJ;iii ..... ..... iii ......... lii ........ 181111 ..... M^^ ..... K
i. ii^ .•
-------
-------
i ! j""!
PI
i
h
•IIHinliII1!ill IIIII" III lillll'I'll"1 nil I Hlllllil
I Hi. i
iniiiiiiiiiNHiiiniPiiiii MIII muni
-------
Number Index
-------
Number Index Sample Entry
Performing Organization
report number •
CERI-90-16
T|t]e ' Physical/Chemical Treatment of Hazardous Waste Sites:
Speaker Slide Copies and Supporting Information
NT1S Order number PB91 -145433CDH
Reference number See 1287
-------
NUMBER INDEX
AD-A193 502/2/CDH
Installation Restoration Program. Technical
Support Document for Record of Decision,
Cape Newenham, AFS.
AD-A193 502/2/CDH See 1276
AD-A202 315/8/CDH
Installation Restoration Program Technical
Support Document for Record of Decision, Ta-
talina Air Force Station LRRS Site.
AD-A202 315/8/CDH See 1277
AD-P006 468/3/CDH
Toxicological Assessment of Hazardous
Wastes.
AD-P006 468/3/CDH
See 1358
AD-P006 908/8/CDH
Dealing with Toxic Polluted Sediments in the
Great Lakes Basin.
AD-P006 908/8/CDH See 1582
ATSDR/TP-88/06
Toxicoiogical Profile for Benzo(b)Fluoranthene.
PB90-247651/CDH See 1360
ATSDR/TP-88/24
Toxicological Profile for Trichloroethylene.
PB90-127523/CDH See 1361
CERCLA-005/1091
Compendium of CERCLA ARARs fact sheets
and directives.
DE92004878/CDH See 0417
CERI-89-222
Immobilization Technology Seminar: Speaker
Slide Copies and Supporting Information.
PB90-127473/CDH See 1555
CERI-90-16
Physical/Chemical Treatment of Hazardous
Waste Sites: Speaker Slide Copies and Sup-
porting Information.
PB91-145433/CDH See 1287
CONTRIB-721
Bench-Scale Evaluation of Alternative Biologi-
cal Treatment Processes for the Remediation
of Pentachlorophenol- and Creosote-Contami-
nated Materials: Slurry-Phase Bioremediation.
PB92-129683/CDH See 1419
CONTRIB-722
Bench-Scale Evaluation of Alternative Biologi-
cal Treatment Processes for the Remediation
of Pentachlorophenol- and Creosote-Contami-
nated Materials: Solid-Phase Bioremediation.
PB92-129725/CDH See 1420
CONTRIB-728
Biodegradation of Creosote and Pentachloro-
phenol in Contaminated Groundwater: Chemi-
cal and Biological Assessment.
PB92-129659/CDH See 1432
CONTRIB-732
Detoxification of Pentachlorophenol and Creo-
sote Contaminated Groundwater by Physical
Extraction: Chemical and Biological Assess-
ment.
PB92-129733/CDH See 1438
DCN-90-203-080-61-02
Air/Superfund National Technical Guidance
Series. Superfund Air Pathway Analyses
Review Criteria Checklists.
PB90-182544/CDH See 1372
DE87001323/CDH
Draft Record of Decision for the Aluminum
Smelter Conservation/Modernization Program.
DE87001323/CDH See 1087
DE89007900/CDH
Evaluation of Cleanup Levels for Remedial
Action at CERCLA (Comprehensive Environ-
mental Response, Compensation and Liability
Act) Sites Based on a Review of EPA (Envi-
ronmental Protection Agency) Records of De-
cision.
DE89007900/CDH See 1245
DE89010128/CDH
Implementation Plan for the Record of Deci-
sion for Disposal of Hanford Defense, High-
Level, Transuranic, and Tank Wastes.
DE89010128/CDH See 1266
DE89010163/CDH
Superfund Remedial Action Decision Process:
Database for Selected FY87 Records of Deci-
sion.
DE89010163/CDH See 1136
DE91014097/CDH
Characterizing soils for hazardous waste site
assessments.
DE91014097/CDH
See 1495
DE91016758/CDH
Ground-Water Issue: Soil sampling and analy-
sis for volatile organic compounds.
DE91016758/CDH See 1507
DE92004878/CDH
Compendium of CERCLA ARARs fact sheets
and directives.
DE92004878/CDH See 0417
DOE/BP-673
Draft Record of Decision for the Aluminum
Smelter Conservation/Modernization Program.
DE87001323/CDH See 1087
DOE/RL-88-13
Implementation Plan for the Record of Deci-
sion for Disposal of Hanford Defense High-
Level, Transuranic, and Tank Wastes.
DE89010128/CDH See 1266
EPA/DF/DK-90/021A
SARA (Superfund Amendments and Reauthor-
ization Act) Section 313 Roadmaps Data Base.
User's Manual. Version 2.10.
PB90-174855/CDH See 0304
EPA/DF/DK-90/044
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)
(Region 1) (for Microcomputers).
PB90-502618/CDH See 0850
EPA/DF/DK-90/045
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)
(Region 2) (for Microcomputers).
PB90-502626/CDH See 0852
EPA/DF/DK-90/046
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)
(Region 3) (for Microcomputers).
PB90-502634/CDH See 0854
EPA/DF/DK-90/047
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)
(Region 4) (for Microcomputers).
PB90-502642/CDH See 0856
EPA/DF/DK-90/048
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)
(Region 5) (for Microcomputers).
PB90-502659/CDH See 0858
EPA/DF/DK-90/049
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)
(Region 6) (for Microcomputers).
PB90-502667/CDH See 0860
EPA/DF/DK-90/050
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)
(Region 7) (for Microcomputers).
PB90-502675/CDH See 0862
EPA/DF/DK-90/051
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)
(Region 8) (for Microcomputers).
PB90-502683/CDH See 0864
EPA/DF/DK-90/052
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)
(Region 9) (for Microcomputers).
PB90-502691 /CDH See 0866
EPA/DF/DK-90/033
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)
(Region 10) (for Microcomputers).
PB90-502709/CDH See 0868
EPA/DF/DK-91/005
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)
(Region 2-31/2 Inch Diskette IBM PS/2
Compatible) (for Microcomputers).
PB92-500149/CDH See 0851
EPA/DF/DK-92/004
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)
(Region 1-31/2 Inch Diskette IBM PS/2
Compatible) (for Microcomputers).
PB92-500131/CDH See 0849
EPA/DF/DK-92/006
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)
(Region 3-31/2 Inch Diskette IBM PS/2
Compatible) (for Microcomputers).
PB92-500156/CDH See 0853
EPA/DF/DK-92/007
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)
(Region 4-31/2 Inch Diskette IBM PS/2
Compatible) (for Microcomputers).
PB92-500164/CDH See 0855
EPA/DF/DK-92/008
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)
(Region 5-31/2 Inch Diskette IBM PS/2
Compatible) (for Microcomputers).
PB92-500172/CDH See 0857
EPA/DF/DK-92/009
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)
(Region 6-31/2 Inch Diskette IBM PS/2
Compatible) (for Microcomputers).
PB92-500180/CDH See 0859
EPA/DF/DK-92/010
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)
(Region 7-31/2 Inch Diskette IBM PS/2
Compatible) (for Microcomputers).
PB92-500198/CDH See 0861
EPA/DF/DK-92/011
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)
(Region 8-3 1/2 Inch Diskette IBM PS/2
Compatible) (for Microcomputers).
PB92-500206/CDH See 0863
EPA/DF/DK-92/012
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)
(Region 9-31/2 Inch Diskette IBM PS/2
Compatible) (for Microcomputers).
PB92-500214/CDH See 0865
EPA/DF/DK-92/013
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)
(Region 10 - 3 1/2 Inch Diskette IBM PS/2
Compatible) (for Microcomputers).
PB92-500222/CDH See 0867
EPA/DF/DK-93/076
Site Assessment Information Directory (SAID)
Region 1 (for Microcomputers). Date of Cover-
age: October 1991.
PB93-506111 /CDH See 0382
NU-1
-------
I! I
EPA/DF/DK-93/077
I " '"I
EPA/DF/DK-93/077
Slt« Assessment Information Directory (SAID)
Ragten 2 (for Microcomputers). Date of Cover-
age: October 1991.
PS93-506129/CDH See 0383
EPA7DF/DK-93/078
Sitf Asspssme,ot Information Directory (SAID)
Region 3 (for Microcomputers). Date of Cover-
tip: October 1991.
FB83.506137/CQH See 038*
EPA/DF/DK-93/079 ..... ........... ' ..... ..... " ' ' " ........ ......
Sfto Assessmont InformaHon Directory (SAID)
Region 4 (for Microcomputers). Date of Cover-
ag*; Octobef 1991.
PB93-506145/CDH See 0385
EPA/DF/DK-93/080
Sit* Assessment Information Directory (SAID)
Region 5 (for Microcomputers). Date of Cover-
age: 1391.
PB93-506152/CDH See 0386
EPA/DF/DK-93/081
3H« Assessment Information Directory (SAID)
Region 6 (for Microcomputers). Date of Cover-
age: October 1991.
PBi3.506160/CDH See 0387
EPA/DF/OIC-93/Oa2 "" """"""' .....
Sfia Assessmont Information Directory (SAID)
Region 7 (for Microcomputers). Date of Cover-
age' October 1991.
P893.506178/QOH See 0388
EPA/DF/DK-93/083
Sto Assessment Information Directory (SAID)
Region 8 (for Microcomputers). Date of Cover-
age 1991.
P893-506186/CDH See 0389
EPA/DF/DK-93/084
InformaHon Directory (SAID)
R«gton 9 (for Microcomputers). Date of Cover-
age; October 1991.
PB83-506194/CDH See 0390
EPA/pF/pK-93/085
Siia Assessmont Information Directory (SAID)
Region 10 (for Microcomputers). Date of Cov-
erage: October 1991.
P893-506202/CDH See 0391
EPA/DF-82/014
Nofflteatlon of Hazardous Substance Sites
(Section 103(c)).
P882-191990/CDH See 1147
EPA/IMSD-90/013
Hazardous Waste Superfund Collection: Data-
base Thesaurus.
PB91-131326/COH See 0138
EPA/SW/DK-90/025A
Organic Contract Compliance Screening
System (OCCSS) Software for the PC (Version
2/90) Usar Manual.
PB90.213844/CPH See 0048
EPA/SW/DK-90/026A
Inorganic Contract Compliance Screening
System (ICCSS) Software for the PC (Version
3/90) Usor Manual.
PBSO-213836/CDH See 0035
EPA/SW/DK-92/002
PA-Sopre (Preliminary Assessment Score),
Version 1.0 (for Microcomputers).
P892-500032/CDH See 0368
EPA/SW/DK-92/002A
PA:Sopr« Software, Version 1.0. Users Manual
ana Tutorial.
PB92-963302/CDH See 0371
NUMBER INDEX
EPA/SW/DK-92/031
Organic Contract Compliance Screening
System (OCCSS) Software (SOW OLM01.8
Version January 1992) (Version 1) (for Micro-
computers).
PB92-501535/CDH See 0056
EPA/SW/DK-92/031A
Organic Contract Compliance Screening
System. Software for the PC (OLM01.8 Version
1). User Manual.
PB92-145564/CDH See 0057
EPA/SW/DK-92/032
Organic Contract Compliance Screening
System (OCCSS) Software (SOW March 1990)
(Version 1) (for Microcomputers).
PB92-501527/CDH See 0055
EPA/SW/DK-92/032A
Organic Contract Compliance Screening
System. Software for the PC (SOW March
1990, Version 1). User Manual.
PB92-145572/CDH See 0059
EPA/SW/DK-92/033
Inorganic Contract Compliance Screening
System (ICCSS) Software (SOW March 1990)
(Version 1) (for Microcomputers).
PB92-5P1519/CDH See 0040
EPA/SW/DK-92/033A
Inorganic Contract Compliance Screening
System Software for the PC (SOW March 1990
Version 1). User Manual.
PB92-145598/CDH See 0041
EPA/SW/DK-92/034
Organic Contract Compliance Screening
System (OCCSS) Software (SOW February
1988) (for Microcomputers).
PB92-501501/CDH See 0054
EPA/SW/DK-92/034A
Organic Contract Compliance Screening
System. Software for the PC (Version June
1990). User Manual.
PB92-145580/CDH See 0060
EPA/SW/DK-92/043
Organic Contract Compliance Screening
System (OCCSS) Software (OLM01.8 Version
2) (for Microcomputers).
PB92-502202/CDH See 0049
EPA/SW/DK-92/043A
Organic Contract Compliance Screening
System. Software for the PC (OLM01.8 Version
2) (User Manual).
PB92-169564/CDH See 0058
EPA/SW/DK-92/046
Environmental Monitoring Methods Index
(EMMI), Version 1.0 (for Microcomputers).
PB92-503093/CDH See 1239
EPA/SW/DK-92/048
Preliminary Ranking Evaluation Score (PREs-
oore) Version 1.1 (for Microcomputers).
PB92-503507/CDH See 0372
EPA/SW/DK-92/050
Environmental Monitoring Methods Index
(EMMI), Version 1.0 (5 - User LAN) (for Micro-
computers).
PB92-504257/CDH See 1238
EPA/SW/DK-92/051
Environmental Monitoring Methods Index
(EMMI), Version 1.0 (Unlimited User LAN) (for
Microcomputers).
PB92-504265/CDH See 1240
EPA/SW/DK-92/053A
AutoMOUSE: An Improvement to the MOUSE
Computerized Uncertainty Analysis System
Operational Manual.
PB93-100113/CDH See 1201
I
EPA/SW/DK-93/002
Organic Contract Compliance Screening
System (OCCSS) Software (OLM01.8 Version
3) (for Microcomputers).
PB93-500270/CDH See 0050
EPA/SW/DK-93/003
Inorganic Contract Compliance Screening
System (ICCSS) Software (ILM02.1 Version 2)
(for Microcomputers).
PB93-500288/CDH See 0036
EPA/SW/DK-93/008
PA-Score (Preliminary Assessment Score),
Version 2.1, 5 1/4 inch (for Microcomputers).
PB93-500346/CDH See 0370
EPA/SW/DK-93/009
PA-Score (Preliminary Assessment Score),
Version 2.1, 3 1/2 inch (for Microcomputers).
PB93-500353/CDH See 0369
EPA/SW/DK-93/046
Organic Contract Compliance Screening
System (OCCSS) Software (OLM01.8 Version
4) (for Microcomputers).
PB93-505345/CDH See 0051
EPA/SW/DK-93/047
Inorganic Contract Compliance Screening
System (ICCSS) Software (ILM02.1 Version 3)
(for Microcomputers).
PB93-505352/CDH See 0037
EPA/SW/DK-93/066
Preliminary Ranking Evaluation Score (PREs-
core) Version 2.0 (for Microcomputers).
PB93-505915/CDH See 0373
EPA/SW/DK-93/066A
PREscore Software: Users Manual and Tutorial
Version 2.0.
PB93-192698/CDH See 0375
EPA/SW/DK-93/073
Organic Contract Compliance Screening
System (OCCSS) Software (OLM01.8 Version
5) (for Microcomputers).
PB93-506053/CDH See 0052
EPA/SW/DK-94/072
Inorganic Contract Compliance Screening
System (ICCSS) Software (ILM02.1 Version 4)
(for Microcomputers).
PB94-500642/CDH See 0038
EPA/SW/DK-94/084
Organic Contract Compliance Screening
System (OCCSS) Software (OLM01.8 Version
6) (for Microcomputers).
PB94-501335/CDH See 0053
EPA/SW/DK-94/085
Inorganic Contract Compliance Screening
System (ICCSS) Software (ILM02.1 Version 5)
(for Microcomputers).
PB94-501467/CDH See 0039
EPA/101/F-90/027
Some Major Factors Important in Establishing
Land Use Policy for Remediated Superfund
Sites.
PB90-256686/CDH See 0308
EPA/101/F-90/031
Ecosystem Effects of Superfund. National Pri-
ority List Sites in Industrial Landscapes: A
Framework for Policy Decisions.
PB90-256728/CDH See 0135
EPA/101/F-90/051
Criteria for Choosing Indicator Species for Eco-
logical Risk Assessments at Superfund Sites
(90-6402).
PB91-204321/CDH See 1224
NU-2
-------
NUMBER INDEX
EPA/451/R-93/003
EPA/171/R-92/005
Estimating VOC Emissions from Superfund
Sites in the Houston-Galveston Texas Area.
(NNEMS Project No. 1302).
PB92-196013/CDH See 1406
EPA/171/R-92/017
Future Land Use Scenarios for Federal Facili-
ties.
PB92-182427/CDH See 0897
EPA/230/03-89/043
Nature and Extent of Ecological Risks at Su-
perfund Sites and RCRA (Resource Conserva-
tion and Recovery Act) Facilities (Executive
Summary Included).
PB90-137316/CDH See 1060
EPA/230/03-89/044
Ecological Risk Assessment Methods: A
Review and Evaluation of Past Practices in the
Superfund and RCRA (Resource Conservation
and Recovery Act) Programs (Executive Sum-
mary Included).
PB90-137324/CDH See 1024
EPA/230/03-89/045
Ecological Risk Management in the Superfund
and RCRA (Resource Conservation and Re-
covery Act) Programs.
PB90-137332/CDH See 1025
EPA/230/03-89/046
Summary of Ecological Risks, Assessment
Methods, and Risk Management Decisions in
Superfund and RCRA (Resource Conservation
and Recovery Act).
PB90-137340/CDH See 1077
EPA/230/04-90/077
Communicating with the Public About Hazard-
ous Materials: An Examination of Local Prac-
tice. Risk Communication Series.
PB90-235938/CDH See 0464
EPA/230/11-89/071
Achieving Greater Consistency between Sub-
jective and Objective Risks.
PB90-229832/CDH See 1017
EPA/230/R-92/014
Methods for Evaluating the Attainment of
Cleanup Standards. Volume 2. Ground Water.
PB94-138815/CDH See 1469
EPA/300/B-94/002
BEN: A Model to Calculate the Economic Ben-
efits of Noncompliance. User's Manual (Re-
vised).
PB94-141652/CDH See 1205
EPA/402/R-92/005
Computer Models Used to Support Cleanup
Decision-Making at Hazardous and Radioactive
Waste Sites.
PB93-183333/CDH See 1218
EPA/402/R-93/011
Environmental Characteristics of EPA, NRG,
and DOE Sites Contaminated with Radioactive
Substances.
PB93-185551/CDH See 1237
EPA/402/R-93/084
Issues Paper on Radiation Site Cleanup Regu-
lations.
PB94-112349/CDH See 1280
EPA/402/S-94/001
Meeting Summary: National Advisory Council
on Environmental Policy and Technology (1st).
Subcommittee on Radiation Cleanup Regula-
tion. Held in Washington, DC. on October 18-
19, 1993.
PB94-136678/CDH See 1059
EPA/430/09-89/008
Overview of Selected EPA (Environmental Pro-
tection Agency) Regulations and Guidance Af-
fecting POTW (Publicly Owned Treatment
Works) Management.
PB90-129263/CDH See 0432
EPA/440/6-90/008
Compendium of Federal Financial Assistance
Programs: Targeting Programs for State and
Local Ground-Water Protection.
PB93-116069/CDH See 1435
EPA/450/1-89/001
Air/Superfund National Technical Guidance
Study Series. Volume 1. Application of Air
Pathway Analyses for Superfund Activities.
PB90-113374/CDH See 1390
EPA/450/1-89/001A
Air/Superfund National Technical Guidance
Study Series. Volume 1. Overview of Air Path-
way Assessments for Superfund Sites (Re-
vised).
PB93-173987/CDH See 1391
EPA/450/1-89-002A
Air/Superfund National Technical Guidance
Study Series. Volume 2. Estimation of Baseline
Air Emissions at Superfund Sites (Revised).
PB90-270588/CDH See 1392
EPA/450/1-89/004
Air/Superfund National Technical Guidance
Study Series. Volume 4. Procedures for Disper-
sion Modeling and Air Monitoring for Superfund
Air Pathway Analysis.
PB90-113382/CDH See 1394
EPA/450/1-90/001
Air/Superfund National Technical Guidance
Series. Superfund Air Pathway Analyses
Review Criteria Checklists.
PB90-182544/CDH See 1372
EPA/450/1-90/002
Air/Superfund National Technical Guidance
Study Series. Comparisons of Air Stripper Sim-
ulations and Field Performance Data.
PB90-207317/CDH See 1376
EPA/450/1-90/003
Air/Superfund National Technical Guidance
Study Series. Air Stripper Design Manual.
PB91-125997/CDH See 1374
EPA/450/1-90/005
Air/Superfund National Technical Guidance
Study Series. Contingency Plans at Superfund
Sites Using Air Monitoring.
PB91-102129/CDH See 1378
EPA/450/1-91/001
Air/Superfund National Technical Guidance
Study Series. Emission Factors for Superfund
Remediation Technologies.
PB91-190975/CDH See 1381
EPA/450/1-91/002
Air/Superfund National Technical Guidance
Study Series: Estimation of Air Impacts for Air
Stripping of Contaminated Water.
PB91-211888/CDH See 1382
EPA/450/1-91/003
Air/Superfund National Technical Guidance
Study Series. Database of Emission Rate
Measurement Projects.
PB91-222059/CDH See 1379
EPA/450/1-92/001
Air/Superfund National Technical Guidance
Study Series: Estimation of Air Impacts for Soil
Vapor Extraction (SVE) Systems.
PB92-143676/CDH See 1383
EPA/450/1-92/002
Air/Superfund National Technical Guidance
Study Series. Guideline for Predictive Baseline
Emissions Estimation Procedures for Super-
fund Sites.
PB92-171909/CDH See 1387
EPA/450/1-92/003
Air Superfund National Technical Guidance
Study Series. Screening Procedures for Esti-
mating the Air Impacts of Incineration at Su-
perfund Sites.
PB92-171917/CDH See 1389
EPA/450/1-92/004
Air Superfund National Technical Guidance
Study Series. Estimation of Air Impacts for the
Excavation of Contaminated Soil.
PB92-171925/CDH See 1384
EPA/450/4-89/015
Guidance on Applying the Data Quality Objec-
tives Process for Ambient Air Monitoring
Around Superfund Sites (Stages 1 and 2).
PB90-204603/CDH See 0988
EPA/450/4-89/020
Review and Evaluation of Area Source Disper-
sion Algorithms for Emission Sources at Super-
fund Sites.
PB90-142753/CDH See 1416
EPA/450/4-90/005
Guidance on Applying the Data Quality Objec-
tives Process for Ambient Air Monitoring
Around Superfund Sites (Stage 3).
PB90-204611 /CDH See 0987
EPA/450/4-90/014
Air/Superfund National Technical Guidance
Study Series. Development of Example Proce-
dures for Evaluating the Air Impacts of Soil
Excavation Associated with Superfund Reme-
dial Actions.
PB90-255662/CDH See 1380
EPA/450/R-93/505
Hydraulic Fracturing Technology: Technology
Evaluation Report and Application Analysis
Report.
PB94-100161 /CDH See 1265
EPA/451/R-92/001
Air/Superfund National Technical Guidance
Study Series: Applicability of Open Path Moni-
tors for Superfund.
PB93-138154/CDH See 1375
EPA/451/R-92/002
Assessing Potential Indoor Air Impacts for Su-
perfund Sites. Air/Superfund National Techni-
cal Guidance Study Series.
PB93-122257/CDH See 1395
EPA/451/R-93/001
Air/Superfund National Technical Guidance
Study Series. Models for Estimating Air Emis-
sion Rates from Superfund Remedial Actions.
PB93-186807/CDH See 1388
EPA/451/R-93/002
Air/Superfund National Technical Guidance
Study Series. Air Emissions from Area
Sources: Estimating Soil and Soil-Gas Sample
Number Requirements.
PB93-173995/CDH See 1373
EPA/451/R-93/003
Estimation of Air Impacts for Bioventing Sys-
tems Used at Superfund Sites. Air/Superfund
National Technical Guidance Study Series.
PB93-215655/CDH See 1407
NU-3
-------
EPA/451/R-93/004
NUMBER INDEX
EPA/4S1/R-93/004
Alr/Suporfund National Technical Guidance
Study Series: Estimation of Air Impacts from
Area Sources of Particulate Matter Emissions
at Sufxxfund Sites.
PB93-215648/COH See 1385
EPi/451/R-93/005
Estimation of Air Impacts for Thermal Desorp-
tlbn Uoits Used at Superfund Sites. Air/Super-
furjd National Technical Guidance Study
Series.
P,B93-21563q/CDH See 1409
EPA/451/R-93/006
EsSmation'of Air Impacts for Solidification and
Stabifeaiion Processes Used at Superfund
SUm, AJr/Superfund National Technical Guid-
aixsa Study Swtes.
PS93-215622/CDH See 1408
EPA/4S1/R-93/007
Ajr/Supflrfund Nattonal "Technical Guidance
Study Series. Volume 4. Guidance for Ambient
Air Monitoring at Superfund Sites (Revised).
P893-199214/COH See 1393
EPA/451/R.93/008 ""' ' ""
Alr/Suporfund National Technical Guidance
Study Series: Compilation of Information on
Resl-TJma Air Monitoring for Use at Superfund
Sitos.
P§|3-199222/CDH See 1377
EPA/4S1/R-93/009
Atr/Suporfund National Technical Guidance
Study S«ries: Evaluation of Snort-Term Air
Action Lavote for Superfund Sites.
PB93-200913/CDH See 1386
EPA/451/R-93/P12
Options for Developing and Evaluating Mitiga-
tfon Strategies for Indoor Air Impacts at
CERCLA Sttas, Alr/Superfund National Techni-
cal Guidance Study Series, Report ASF-36.
PS94-110517/COH See 1415
EPA/454/R-92/014
Comparison of a Revised Area Source Algo-
rithm for the Industrial Source Complex Short
Term Model and Wind Tunnel Data.
PS83-226751/CDH See 1216
EPA/454/R-93/001
Contingency Analysis Modeling for Superfund
Sites and Other Sources.
PB93-169126/CDH See1219
EPA/4'54/V-92-002" ,""","' """' \ ".'!,.!'
Instructional Package on Regulatory Air Quality
Modfling. Part 1: Videos on the 'Guideline on
Air Quality Models (Revised)' and the Model
Clearinghouse (Video).
PS84-780012/C0H See 1412
EPA/6pO/B-92/p06
Ground-Water Modeling Compendium. Model
Fad Sheets, Descriptions, Applications and
Aitflismf rjt Framtwork.
P|g3i.207504/CDHi;;' „,;,„,„ ' 366,145?,
EPA/600/K-93/001
In situ treatment'"of' Contaminated Ground
Watw; An Inventory of Research and Reid
D«monstrations and Strategies for Improving
Ground Water Remediation Technologies.
P893.193720/CDH See 1466
EPA/520/1-89/012
Ctwacterizatkin of Contaminated Son from the
MonlcWr/Gton Ridge, New Jersey, Superfund
168063/CDH
See 1493
EPA/520/F-92/001
Superfund Information Repositories and Ad-
ministrative Records: Introduction for Librar-
ians.
PB92-963621/CDH See 0497
EPA/520/F-92/002
Superfund Information Repositories and Ad-
ministrative Records.
PB92-963622/CDH See 0884
EPA/520/F-92/003
Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Cleanup
Efforts Nationwide (White Chemical).
PB92-963611/CDH See 0971
EPA/520/F-92/004
Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Cleanup
Efforts Nationwide (Bog Creek Farm).
PB92-963612/CDH See 0940
EPA/520/F-92/005
Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Cleanup
Efforts Nationwide, Fall 1992. (Celanese Cor-
poration Site Profile).
PB92-963617/CDH See 0943
EPA/520/F-92/006
Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Cleanup
Efforts Nationwide, Fall 1992. (Valley of the
Drums, Bullitt County, Kentucky).
PB92-963618/CDH See 0947
EPA/520/F-92/007
Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Cleanup
Efforts Nationwide (City Industries).
PB92-963619/CDH See 0941
EPA/520/F-92/008
Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Cleanup
Efforts Nationwide (McKin Company).
PB92-963620/CDH See 0953
EPA/520/F-92/009
Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Cleanup
Efforts Nationwide, Fall 1992. (American Ther-
mostat Corporation, New York).
PB92-963627/CDH See 0942
EPA/526/F-92/010
Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Cleanup
Efforts Nationwide, Fall 1992. (Wide Beach
Section of Brant, New York).
PB92-963628/CDH 3660948
EPA/520/F-92/011
Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Cleanup
Efforts Nationwide, Fall 1992, (Krysowaty
Farm, Hillsbprqugh, New Jersey).
PB92-963629/CDH See 0945
EPA/520/F-92/015
Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Cleanup
Efforts Nationwide, Winter 1993. (Wells G and
H Site, Woburn, Massachusetts).
PB93-963601/CDH See 0972
EPA/520/F-92/016
Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Cleanup
Efforts Nationwide, Fall 1992. (Lansdowne Ra-
dioactive Residence Site Profile).
PB92-963625/CDH See 0946
EPA/520/F-92/017
Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Cleanup
Efforts Nationwide, Fall 1992. (Ciba-Geigy Cor-
poration, Mclntosh, Alabama).
PB92-963630/CDH See 0944
EPA/520/F-93/001
Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Cleanup
Efforts Nationwide, Spring 1993 (Triana/Ten-
nessee River Site, Alabama).
PB93-963603/CDH See 0960
EPA/520/F-93/002
Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Cleanup
Efforts Nationwide, Spring 1993 (United
Chrome Products Site Profile).
PB93-963607/CDH See 0961
EPA/520/F-93/003
Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Cleanup
Efforts Nationwide, Spring 1993 (Old Midland
Products Site Profile, Yell County, Arkansas).
PB93-963608/CDH See 0957
EPA/520/F-93/004
Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Cleanup
Efforts Nationwide, Spring 1993 (French Limit-
ed Site Profile, Harris County, Texas).
PB93-963609/CDH See 0954
EPA/520/F-93/005
Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Cleanup
Efforts Nationwide, Spring 1993 (Powersville
Site Profile, Peach County, Georgia).
PB93-963611 /CDH See 0958
EPA/520/F-93/006
Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Cleanup
Efforts Nationwide, Spring 1993 (Radium
Chemical Site Profile, Queens, New York).
PB93-963612/CDH See 0959
EPA/520/F-93/007
Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Cleanup
Efforts Nationwide, Spring 1993 (Harvey and
Knott Drum Site, New Castle County, Dela-
ware).
PB93-963614/CDH See 0956
EPA/520/F-93/008
Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Cleanup
Efforts Nationwide, Spring 1993 (Fulton Termi-
nals Site Profile, Oswego County, NY).
PB93-963616/CDH See 0955
EPA/520/F-93/009
Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Cleanup
Efforts Nationwide, Summer 1993 (Tri-State
Plating Site Profile, Columbus, Indiana).
PB93-963615/CDH See 0970
EPA/520/F-93/010
Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Cleanup
Efforts Nationwide, Summer 1993 (Fike/Artel
Chemical Site Profile, Nitro, West Virginia).
PB93-963626/CDH See 0967
EPA/520/F-93/011
Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Cleanup
Efforts Nationwide, Summer 1993 (Coal Creek
Site Profile, Chehalis, Washington).
PB94-963609/CDH See 0964
EPA/520/F-93/013
Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Cleanup
Efforts Nationwide, Summer 1993 (Rogue
Valley/Ditch Creek Ranch Site Profile, Wimer,
Oregon).
PB93-963629/CDH See 0969
EPA/520/F-93/014
Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Cleanup
Efforts Nationwide, Summer 1993 (Common
Steps in the Removal Process).
PB93-963631/CPH, „ , See 0965
EPA/520/F-93/015
Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Cleanup
Efforts Nationwide, Summer 1993 (Army Creek
Landfill Site Profile, New Castle, Delaware).
PB93-963627/CDH See 0962
EPA/520/F-93/016
Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Cleanup
Efforts Nationwide, Summer 1993 (Chisman
Creek Site Profile, York County, Virginia).
PB94-963607/CDH See 0963
NU-4
-------
NUMBER INDEX
EPA/540/2-90/011
EPA/520/F-93/017
Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Cleanup
Efforts Nationwide, Summer 1993 (Northside
Landfill Site Profile, Spokane, Washington).
PB94-963611/CDH See 0968
EPA/520/F-93/018
Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Cleanup
Efforts Nationwide, Summer 1993 (Eastern Di-
versified Metals Site Profile, Sohuylkill County,
Pennsylvania).
PB93-963628/CDH See 0966
EPA/520/F-93/019
Superfund and Small Waste Contributors.
PB94-963610/CDH See 0881
EPA/520/F-94/001
Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Cleanup
Efforts Nationwide, Fall 1993 (Brown Wood
Preserving Site Profile, Suwanee County, Flori-
da).
PB94-963601/CDH See 0950
EPA/520/F-94/002
Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Cleanup
Efforts Nationwide, Fall 1993 (Johns-Manville
Site Profile, Illinois).
PB94-963602/CDH See 0952
EPA/520/F-94/003
Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Cleanup
Efforts Nationwide, Fall 1993 (Big D Camp-
ground Site Profile, Ashtabula County, Kings-
ville, Ohio).
PB94-963608/CDH See 0949
EPA/520/F-94/004
Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Cleanup
Efforts Nationwide, Fall 1993 (Bunker Hill Site
Profile, Silver Valley, Northern Idaho).
PB94-963604/CDH See 0951
EPA/520/F-94/005
Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Cleanup
Efforts Nationwide, Winter 1994 (Seymour Re-
cycling Site Profile, Seymour, Indiana).
PB94-963612/CDH See 0975
EPA/520/F-94/006
Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Cleanup
Efforts Nationwide, Winter 1994 (Bailey Waste
Disposal Site Profile, Texas).
PB94-963613/CDH See 0973
EPA/520/F-94/007
Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Cleanup
Efforts Nationwide, Winter 1994 (New Brighton
Site Profile, Minneapolis/St. Paul, Minnesota).
PB94-963615/CDH See 0974
EPA/520/R-93/001
Report to Congress: Settlements with Munici-
pal Waste Generators and Transporters Since
1991 under the Comprehensive Environmental
Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of
1980.
PB93-963604/CDH See 0596
EPA/530/R-92/014M
Inside the Hotline: A Compilation of 1992
Monthly Hotline Reports.
PB93-159572/CDH See 0141
EPA/530/R-93/012
Technical Resource Document: Solidification/
Stabilization and Its Application to Waste Ma-
terials.
PB93-237535/CDH See 1565
EPA/530/R-93/014
Guidance for Capacity Assurance Planning.
Capacity Planning Pursuant to CERCLA Sec-
tion 104(c)(9).
PB93-209898/CDH See 0137
EPA/530/SW-90/076
Mobile Incineration: An Analysis of the Indus-
try.
PB90-255449/CDH See 1480
EPA/530/SW-91/065A
Mining Sites on the National Priorities List
NPL Site Summary Reports. Volume 1 (Alumi-
num Company of America (Vancouver Smelter)
to Cleveland Mill).
PB92-124767/CDH See 0350
EPA/530/SW-91/065B
Mining Sites on the National Priorities List
NPL Site Summary Reports. Volume 2 (Com-
mencement Bay Nearshore/Tideflats to Kerr
McGee) (Kress Creek, Reed-Keppler Park,
Residential Areas, Sewage Treatment Plant).
PB92-124775/CDH See 0351
EPA/530/SW-91/065C
Mining Sites on the National Priorities List:
NPL Site Summary Reports. Volume 3 (Kerr-
McGee Chemical Corp. (Soda Springs Plant) to
Ormet Corp).
PB92-124783/CDH See 0352
EPA/530/SW-91/065D
Mining Sites on the National Priorities List:
NPL Site Summary Reports. Volume 4 (Oron-
ogo-Duenweg Mining Belt to Tar Creek).
PB92-124791/CDH See 0353
EPA/530/SW-91/065E
Mining Sites on the National Priorities List:
NPL Site Summary Reports. Volume 5 (Tele-
dyne Wan Chang to Wayne Interim Storage
Facility/W.R. Grace).
PB92-124809/CDH See 0354
EPA/530/SW-91/093N
Inside the Hotline: A Compilation of 1991
Monthly Hotline Reports.
PB92-131390/CDH See 0140
EPA/530/SW-91/094
Index to the Monthly Hotline Report Questions
(June 1982 to December 1991).
PB92-131374/CDH See 0139
EPA/540/1-89/001
Risk Assessment Guidance for Superfund.
Volume 2. Environmental Evaluation Manual.
PB90-155599/CDH See 1072
EPA/540/1-89/002
Risk Assessment Guidance for Superfund.
Volume 1. Human Health Evaluation Manual.
Part A.
PB90-155581/CDH See 1065
EPA/540/1-89/003
OSWER Comparative Risk Project. Executive
Summary and Overview.
PB90-272501/CDH See 1062
EPA/540/2-87/001
Handbook: Responding to Discharges of Sink-
ing Hazardous Substances.
PB91-228346/CDH See 1589
EPA/540/2-88/003
Assessment of International Technologies for
Superfund Applications: Technology Review
and Trip Report Results.
PB90-106428/CDH See 1197
EPA/540/2-89/054B
Evaluation of Ground-Water Extraction Reme-
dies. Volume 2. Case Studies 1-19.
PB90-274440/CDH See 1446
EPA/540/2-89/054C
Evaluation of Ground-Water Extraction Reme-
dies. Volume 3. General Site Data: Data Base
Reports.
PB90-274457/CDH See 1447
EPA/540/2-89/055
Forum on Innovative Hazardous Waste Treat-
ment Technologies: Domestic and Internation-
al. Held in Atlanta, Georgia on June 19-21,
1989. Abstract Proceedings.
PB90-268509/CDH See 1252
EPA/540/2-89/056
Forum on Innovative Hazardous Waste Treat-
ment Technologies: Domestic and Internation-
al. Held in Atlanta, Georgia on June 19-21,
1989. Technical Papers.
PB90-183799/CDH See 1253
EPA/540/2-89/057
Determining Soil Response Action Levels
Based on Potential Contaminant Migration to
Ground Water: A Compendium of Examples.
PB90-183575/CDH See 1497
EPA/540/2-89/058
Guide for Conducting Treatability Studies
under CERCLA.
PB90-249772/CDH See 1154
EPA/540/2-90/001
Assessment of Technologies for the Remedi-
ation of Radioactively Contaminated Superfund
Sites.
PB90-204140/CDH See 1198
EPA/540/2-90/003A
Inventory of Treatability Study Vendors.
Volume 1.
PB91-228395/CDH See 1171
EPA/540/2-90/004
Bioremediation in the Field: Number 1, Novem-
ber 1990.
PB93-206340/CDH See 1424
EPA/540/2-90/005A
Environmental Asbestos Assessment Manual.
Superfund Method for the Determination of As-
bestos in Ambient Air. Part 1. Method.
PB90-274283/CDH See 1027
EPA/540/2-90/005B
Environmental Asbestos Assessment Manual.
Superfund Method for the Determination of As-
bestos in Ambient Air. Part 2. Technical Back-
ground Document.
PB90-274291/CDH See 1028
EPA/540/2-90/006
Innovative Operational Treatment Technol-
ogies for Application to Superfund Site: Nine
Case Studies.
PB90-202656/CDH See 1269
EPA/540/2-90/007
CERCLA Site Discharges to POTWS Treatabil-
ity Manual.
PB91-921269/CDH See 1577
EPA/540/2-90/008
CERCLA Site Discharges to POTWS CERCLA
Site Sampling Program: Detailed Data Report.
PB91-921270/CDH See 1575
EPA/540/2-90/009
Abstract Proceedings: Forum on Innovative
Hazardous Waste Treatment Technologies;
Domestic and International (2nd). Held in
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania on May 15-17,
1990.
PB91-145649/CDH See 1186
EPA/540/2-90/011
Subsurface Contamination Reference Guide.
PB91-921292/CDH See 1474
NU-5
-------
EPA/540/2-90/012
NUMBER INDEX
EPA754d/2-90/bl2
International Evaluation of In-situ Biorestora-
«on of Contaminated Soiland Groundwater
(September 1990)-TransiaUon.
PB93-207553/COH See 1517
EPA/540/2-90/013
Sotvont Extraction Treatment
PB91-228015/CDH See 1306
EPA/540/2-90/014
Mobite/Transportable Incineration Treatment
PB91-228023/COH See 1481
EPA/540/2-90/015
Chemical Dehalogenatlon Treatment: APEG
Treatment.
PB91-228031/CDH See 1210
EPAV540/2-90/016
Slurry Biodegradation.
PS91-228049/CDH See 1428
EPA7540/2-96/017
Sol Washing Treatment.
PB91-228056/CDH See 1532
EPA/540/2-90/018 1,1
Gokla to Pump and Treat Groundwater Reme-
diation Technology,
PB91-921356/COH See 1462
EPA/S40/2-91/001
Irijjovatlva , Treatment technologies: Semi-
Ajjrjual Status Report, January 1991. First
Issua.
P&91.921290/CDH See 1274
IfiSbvalva Treatment Technologies: Semi-
Annua) Status Report. (Third Edition).
PB92-173210/CPH See 1275
EPA/S46/2-91/002
Understanding Bioremedfation: A Guidebook
for Citizens,
PB93.20587p/O>i See 0507
EP/K40/2-91/004',, "'' .'!"' " | '
Suportund Engineering Issue: Issues Affecting
tha Applicability and Success of Remedial/Re-
moval Incineration Projects.
PB92-109081/CDH See 1308
EPA/540/2-91/005
In itu Steam Extraction Treatment
PB91-228064/CDH See 1512
EPA/540/2-91/006
In situ Son Vapor Extraction Treatment.
PB91-228072/COH See 1511
EPA7540/2-9i/008
Thormal Dssorptlon Treatment
PB91-228060/CDH See 1357
EPA|540/2-91/(H)9' ", " ~
Supwfund Engineering Issue: Treatment of
Lead-Contaminated Soils.
PB91-921291/CDH See 1535
EPA/5"4Q/2-91/p10 "' '"™ ,' ,„' ,',
Survey of Materials-Handling Technologies
Usc-d at Hazardous Waste Sites.
P|il-92i203/CbHiii ~m " See 1323
EPA/540/2-91/011
llniki , f ", ,'ivi: . 'lii'Liin!' ' , ',
Vgpdor Information Form to be Completed for
Participation in the: Vendor Information System
fo? Innovative " Treatment Technologies
(vTstrf).
PS91-921289/CDH See 1369
EPA/540/2-91/013A
GukJa for Conducting Treatability Studies
under CERCLA: Aerobic Biodegradation
Remedy Screening. Interim Guidance.
PB92.109065/CDH See 1157
EPA/540/2-91/013B
Guide for Conducting Treatability Studies
under CERCLA: Aerobic Biodegradation
Remedy Screening.
PB92-109073/CDH See 1156
Guide for Conducting Treatability Studies
under CERCLA: Aerobic Biodegradation
Remedy Screening. Quick Reference Fact
Sheet.
PB92-224377/CDH See 1158
EPA/540/2-91/015
Forum on Innovative Hazardous Waste Treat-
ment Technologies (3rd): Domestic and Inter-
national. Held in Dallas, Texas on June 11-13,
1991. Technical Papers.
PB92-219732/CDH See 1254
EPA/540/2-91/018
Bioremediation in the Field. An Information
Update on Applying Bioremediation to Site
Clean-Up. Number 3.
PB92-224807/CDH See 1422
EPA/540/2-91/019A
Guide for Conducting Treatability Studies
under CERCLA: Soil Vapor Extraction. Interim
Guidance.
PB92-227271/CDH See 1163
EPA/540/2-91/019B
Guide for Conducting Treatability Studies
under CERCLA: Soil Vapor Extraction. Quick
Reference Fact Sheet.
PB92-224401/CDH See 1164
EPA/540/2-91/020A
Guide for Conducting Treatability Studies
under CERCLA: Soil Washing. Interim Guid-
ance.
PB92-170570/CDH See 1165
EPA/540/2-91/020B
Guide for Conducting Treatability Studies
under CERCLA: Soil Washing: Quick Refer-
ence Fact Sheet.
PB92-170588/CDH See 1166
EPA/540/2-91/021
in situ Soil Flushing. Engineering Bulletin.
PB92-180025/CDH See 1510
EPA/540/2-91/022
Air Stripping of Aqueous Solutions. Engineering
Bulletin.
PB92-180Q33/CDH See 1371
EPA/540/2-91/p23
Control of Air Emissions from Materials Han-
dling during Remediation. Engineering Bulletin.
PB92-180041/CDH See 1398
EPA/540/2-91/024
Granular Activated Carbon Treatment. Engi-
neering Bulletin.
PB92-180058/CDH See 1258
EPA/540/2-91/025
Chemical Oxidation Treatment Engineering
Bulletin.
PB92-180066/CDH See 1211
EPA/540/2-91/027
Bioremediation in the Field: An Information
Update on Applying Bioremediation to Site
Cleanup. (Number 4).
PB92-224708/CDH See 1423
EPA/540/4-89/001
Ground Water Sampling for Metals Analyses.
Superfund Ground Water Issue.
PB91-133249/CDH See 1459
EPA/540/4-89/002
Superfund Ground Water Issue: Accuracy of
Depth to Water Measurements. 2nd in Series
of Issue Papers.
PB90-149840/CDH See 1476
EPA/540/4-89/003
Facilitated Transport. Series of Issue Papers
(3rd).
PB91-133256/CDH See 1451
EPA/540/4-89/004
Superfund Ground Water Issue. Contaminant
Transport in Fractured Media: Models for Deci-
sion Makers.
PB90-268517/CDH See 1477
EPA/540/4-89/005
Performance Evaluations of Pump-and-Treat
Remediations.
PB92-114461/CDH See 1471
EPA/540/4-90/002
National Priorities List Sites: Alabama.
PB91-921209/CDH See 0148
EPA/540/4-90/003
National Priorities List Sites: Alaska.
PB91-921210/CDH See 0151
EPA/540/4-90/004
National Priorities List Sites: Arizona and
Nevada.
PB91-921211/CDH See 0156
EPA/540/4-90/005
National Priorities List Sites: Arkansas.
PB91 -921212/CDH See 0159
EPA/540/4-90/006
National Priorities List Sites: California.
PB91-921213/CDH See 0162
EPA/540/4-90/007
National Priorities List Sites: Colorado.
PB91-921214/CDH See 0165
EPA/540/4-90/008
National Priorities List Sites: Connecticut.
PB91 -921215/CDH See 0168
EPA/540/4-90/009
National Priorities List Sites: Delaware.
PB91-921216/CDH See 0171
EPA/540/4-90/010
National Priorities List Sites: Florida.
PB91-921217/CDH See 0174
EPA/540/4-90/011
National Priorities List Sites: Georgia.
PB91 -921218/CDH See 0177
EPA/540/4-90/012
National Priorities List Sites: Hawaii.
PB91-921219/CDH See 0180
EPA/540/4-90/013
National Priorities List Sites: Idaho.
PB91-921220/CDH See 0181
EPA/540/4-90/014
National Priorities List Sites: Illinois.
PB91-921221/CDH See 0184
EPA/540/4-90/015
National Priorities List Sites: Indiana.
PB91-921222/CDH See 0187
EPA/540/4-90/016
National Priorities List Sites: Iowa.
PB91-921223/CPH See 0190
EPA/540/4-90/017
National Priorities List Sites: Kansas.
PB91 -921224/CDH See 0193
EPA/540/4-90/018
National Priorities List Sites: Kentucky.
PB91-921225/CDH See 0196
EPA/540/4-90/019
National Priorities List Sites: Louisiana.
PB91 -921226/CDH See 0199
NU-6
-------
NUMBER INDEX
EPA/540/5-91/003B
EPA/540/4-90/020
National Priorities List Sites: Maine.
PB91 -921227/CDH See 0202
EPA/540/4-90/021
National Priorities List Sites: Maryland.
PB91 -921228/CDH See 0205
EPA/540/4-90/022
National Priorities List Sites: Massachusetts.
PB91-921229/CDH See 0208
EPA/540/4-90/023
National Priorities List Sites: Michigan.
PB91-921230/CDH See 0211
EPA/540/4-90/024
National Priorities List Sites: Minnesota.
PB91-921231/CDH See 0214
EPA/540/4-90/025
National Priorities List Sites: Mississippi.
PB91-921232/CDH See 0217
EPA/540/4-90/026
National Priorities List Sites: Missouri.
PB91-921233/CDH See 0220
EPA/540/4-90/027
National Priorities List Sites: Montana.
PB91-921234/CDH See 0223
EPA/540/4-90/028
National Priorities List Sites: Nebraska.
PB91-921236/CDH See 0226
EPA/540/4-90/029
National Priorities List Sites: New Hampshire.
PB91-921237/CDH See 0229
EPA/540/4-90/030
National Priorities List Sites: New Jersey.
PB91-921235/CDH See 0232
EPA/540/4-90/031
National Priorities List Sites: New Mexico.
PB91-921238/CDH See 0235
EPA/540/4-90/032
National Priorities List Sites: New York.
PB91-921239/CDH See 0238
EPA/540/4-90/033
National Priorities List Sites: North Carolina.
PB91-921240/CDH See 0243
EPA/540/4-90/034
National Priorities List Sites: North and South
Dakota.
PB91-921241/CDH See 0241
EPA/540/4-90/035
National Priorities List Sites: Ohio.
PB91-921242/CDH See 0247
EPA/540/4-90/036
National Priorities List Sites: Oklahoma.
PB91-921243/CDH See 0250
EPA/540/4-90/037
National Priorities List Sites: Oregon.
PB91-921244/CDH See 0253
EPA/540/4-90/038
National Priorities List Sites: Pennsylvania.
PB91-921245/CDH See 0256
EPA/540/4-90/039
National Priorities List Sites: Rhode Island.
PB91-921246/CDH See 0262
EPA/540/4-90/040
National Priorities List Sites: South Carolina.
PB91-921247/CDH See 0266
EPA/540/4-90/042
National Priorities List Sites: Tennessee.
PB91-921248/CDH See 0269
EPA/540/4-90/043
National Priorities List Sites: Texas.
PB91-921249/CDH See 0272
EPA/540/4-90/044
National Priorities List Sites: Utah.
PB91-921250/CDH See 0276
EPA/540/4-90/045
National Priorities List Sites: Vermont.
PB91-921251/CDH See 0279
EPA/540/4-90/046
National Priorities List Sites: Virginia.
PB91-921252/CDH See 0282
EPA/540/4-90/047
National Priorities List Sites: Washington.
PB91-921253/CDH See 0285
EPA/540/4-90/048
National Priorities List Sites: West Virginia.
PB91 -921254/CDH See 0288
EPA/540/4-90/049
National Priorities List Sites: Wisconsin.
PB91-921255/CDH See 0291
EPA/540/4-90/050
National Priorities List Sites: Wyoming.
PB91 -921256/CDH See 0294
EPA/540/4-90/051
National Priorities List Sites: Puerto Rico.
PB91-921257/CDH See 0259
EPA/540/4-90/052
National Priorities List Sites: American Samoa,
Guam and Trust Territories.
PB91-921258/CDH See 0155
EPA/540/4-90/053
Basic Concepts of Contaminant Sorption at
Hazardous Waste Sites (Ground Water Issue).
PB91-191007/CDH See 1431
EPA/540/4-90/054
Reductive Dehalogenation of Organic Contami-
nants in Soils and Ground Water. Ground
Water Issue.
PB91-191056/CDH See 1527
EPA-540/4-91/001
Ground-Water Issue: Soil sampling and analy-
sis for volatile organic compounds.
DE91016758/CDH See 1507
EPA/540/4-91/003
Ground-Water Issue: Characterizing Soils for
Hazardous Waste Site Assessments.
PB91-921294/CDH See 1455
EPA/540/4-91/005
Ground-Water Issue: The Effects of Well
Casing Material on Ground Water-Quality.
PB92-224724/CDH See 1457
EPA/540/5-89/001A
Technology Evaluation Report SITE Program
Demonstration Test, HAZCON Solidification,
Douglassville, Pennsylvania. Volume 1.
PB89-158810/CDH See 1569
EPA/540/5-89/004C
Technology Evaluation Report: International
Waste Technologies/Geo-Con In situ Stabiliza-
tion/Solidification. Volume 3. Update Report.
PB90-269069/CDH See 1567
EPA/540/5-89/004D
Technology Evaluation Report: International
Waste Technologies/Geo-Con In situ Stabiliza-
tion/Solidification. Volume 4. Update Report.
PB90-269077/CDH See 1568
EPA/540/5-89/005A
Technology Evaluation Report: SITE Program
Demonstration Test, Soliditech, Inc., Solidifica-
tion/Stabilization Process. Volume 1.
PB90-191750/CDH See 1570
EPA/540/5-89/005B
Technology Evaluation Report: SITE Program
Demonstration Test, Soliditech, Inc. Solidifica-
tion/Stabilization Process. Volume 2.
PB90-191768/CDH See 1571
EPA/540/5-89/011 A
Technology Evaluation Report: Chemfix Tech-
nologies, Inc. Solidification/Stabilization Proc-
ess, Clackamas, Oregon. Volume 1.
PB91-127696/CDH See 1566
EPA/540/5-89/011B
Technology Evaluation Report CHEMFIX Tech-
nologies, Inc., Solidification/Stabilization Proc-
ess, Clackamas, Oregon. Volume 2.
PB90-274127/CDH See 1339
EPA/540/5-89/012
Technology Evaluation Report: SITE Program
Demonstration of the Ultrox International Ultra-
violet Radiation/Oxidation Technology.
PB90-198177/CDH See 1351
EPA/540/5-89/013
Superfund Innovative Technology Evaluation
Program: Technology Profiles, November
1989.
PB90-249756/CDH See 1317
EPA/540/5-90/001
Superfund Innovative Technology Evaluation
Program: Progress and Accomplishments,
Fiscal Year 1989. A Third Report to Congress.
PB90-216516/CDH See 1311
EPA/540/5-90/002
Technology Evaluation Report: SITE Program.
CF Systems Organics Extraction System, New
Bedford, Massachusetts. Volume 1.
PB90-186495/CDH See 1346
Technology Evaluation Report SITE Program.
CF Systems Organics Extraction System, New
Bedford, Massachusetts. Volume 2.
PB90-186503/CDH See 1347
EPA/540/5-90/004
Development of Electro-Acoustic Soil Decon-
tamination (ESD) Process for In situ Applica-
tions.
PB90-204728/CDH See 1498
EPA/540/5-90/005A
Emerging Technologies: Bio-Recovery Sys-
tems Removal and Recovery of Metal Ions
from Groundwater.
PB90-252594/CDH See 1439
EPA/540/5-90/005B
Emerging Technologies: Bio-Recovery Sys-
tems Removal and Recovery of Metal Ions
from Groundwater. Appendices.
PB90-252602/CDH See 1440
EPA/540/5-90/007
Technology Evaluation Report SITE Program
Demonstration of the DuPont/Oberlin Microfil-
tration Technology.
PB92-153410/CDH See 1350
EPA/540/5-91/003A
Technology Evaluation Report: Biotrol Soil
Washing System for Treatment of a Wood Pre-
serving Site. Volume 1.
PB92-115310/CDH See 1539
EPA/540/5-91 /003B
Technology Evaluation Report: Biotrol Soil
Washing System for Treatment of a Wood Pre-
serving Site. Volume 2, Part A.
PB92-115328/CDH See 1540
NU-7
-------
• Jif! !
t!l!!h
...... 5'f '"' ;1
' R! W
EPA/540/5-91/003C
NUMBER INDEX
EPA/540/S-91/003C
Technology evaluation Report Bfotrol Soil
Washing System for Treatment of a Wood Pre-
serving Site. Volume 2, Part B.
P892-115336/CDH See 1541
SupWfund innovative Technology Evaluation
Program: Progress and Accomplishments,
Fiscal Year 1990. A Fourth Report to Con-
P8B2.224799/CDH See 1312
EPA7S46/S-91/6u5 .............................. ......
Technology Evaluation Report SITE Program
Demonstration Test Horsehead Resource De-
velopment Company, Inc., Rame Reactor
Technology, Monaca, Pennsylvania.
PB92-205855/CDH See 1353
EPA/S40/5-91/007A
Technology Evaluation Report of Retech, Inc.,
Plasma Centrifugal Furnace. Volume 1.
PB92-216035/CDH See 1340
Tichnotogy Evaluation Report of Retech's
Pfeiima Centrifugal Furnace. Volume 1.
PS93-115160/COH See 1342
EPA/S40/5-91/007B
Technology Evaluation Report of Retech, Inc.,
Plasma Centrifugal Furnace. Volume 2.
P892-216043/CDH See 1341
Technology Evaluation Report of Retech's
Plasma Centrifugal Furnace. Volume 2.
P893-1 1 51 78/CDH See 1343
EPA/iw/5-91/Op8 ~: "|T^ " , ' '
Supwfund Innovative Technology Evaluation
Program: Technology Profiles, Fourth Edition.
P|a2-224294/CDH '. ...................... See 1316
EPA/540/5-91/009 ...........................................
Technology Evaluation Report Pilot-Scale
Demonstration of a gurry-Phase Biological Re-
acfjx for Crepspta-Qgntamlnated Soil. Volume
PB93-205532/CDH See 1542
EPA/540/8-89/005 M , £ ..... ..........
Soporfund Emergency Response Actions: A
Summary of Federally Funded Removals.
Vofems 3.
Pf|6>2143S4/CDH See 0318
EPA/640/8-89/006
ROD Annual Report, FY 1989.
PB90-258484/CDH See 1111
EPA'7140/8-89/009
MarMebmont R'evJew "of the Superfund Pro-
gram: implementation Plan.
P890-153883/CDH See 0102
EPA/540/8-89/U11
Anafysis of State Superfund Programs: 50-
Stata Study.
P880-272733/CDH See 0447
EPA/540/8-89/012
Usw's Guide to Contract Laboratory Program.
PB90.186396/CDH See 0078
EPA/S40/8-90/004
Pfogross Toward Implementing Superfund.
Fiscal Year 1988.
P890-249442/CDH See 0299
EPA/540/8-90/005
Status of State Involvement in the Superfund
Program. FY 80 to FY 89.
PB90-272725/CDH See 0114
"" ™
...... ......... ,
Technology Transfer Needs Assessment,
1090, "'
PS9Ii-125674/CDH See 1354
NU-8
EPA/540/8-90/009
SUPERFUND: Focusing on the Nation at
Large. A Decade of Progress at National Prior-
ities List Sites.
PB91-921202/CDH See 0321
Superfund: Focusing on the Nation at Large. A
Decade of Progress at National Priorities List
Sites.
PB91-921207/CDH See 0322
EPA/540/8-90/011
Technical Support Services for Superfund Site
Remediation. Second Edition.
PB91-921285/CDH See 1335
EPA/540/8-90/014
Superfund Emergency Response Actions: A
Summary of Federally Funded Removals.
Fourth Annual Report - Fiscal Year 1989.
PB91-921260/CDH See 0314
EPA/540/8-90/017
Progress Toward Implementing Superfund.
Fiscal Year 1989.
PB91-921204/CDH See 0300
EPA/540/8-90/101
Superfund: Environmental Progress.
PB93-206209/CDH See 0976
EPA/540/8-91/002
Analysis of State Superfund Programs: 50-
State Study, 1990 Update.
PB91-921259/CDH See 0448
EPA/540/8-91/003
.Superfund Program: Ten Years of Progress.
PB91-921286/CDH See 0977
EPA/540/8-91/004
Progress Toward Implementing Superfund,
Fiscal Year 1990: A Report to the Congress.
PB92-963256/CDH See 0301
EPA/540/8-91/007
Bibliography of Federal Reports and Publica-
tions Describing Alternative and Innovative
Treatment Technologies for Corrective Action
and Site Remediation.
PB91-921293/CDH See 1206
EPA/540/8-91/008
Accessing Federal Data Bases for Contaminat-
ed Site Clean-Up Technologies.
PB91-921288/CDH See 1188
EPA/540/8-91/016
Superfund: Focusing on the Nation at Large.
1991 Update.
PB92-963252/CDH See 0323
EPA/540/8-91/017
National Priorities List Sites: Alabama.
PB92-963223/CDH See 0149
EPA/540/8-91/018
National Priorities List Sites: Alaska.
PB92-963251/CDH See 0152
EPA/540/8-91/019
National Priorities List Sites: Arizona and
Nevada.
PB92-963216/CDH See 0157
EPA/540/8-91/020
National Priorities List Sites: Arkansas.
PB92-963220/CDH See 0160
EPA/540/8-91/021
National Priorities List Sites: California and
Hawaii.
PB92-963239/CDH See 0163
EPA/54b/8-91/022
National Priorities List Sites: Colorado.
PB92-963237/CDH See 0166
EPA/540/8-91/023
National Priorities List Sites: Connecticut.
PB92-963203 See 0169
EPA/540/8-91/024
National Priorities List Sites: Delaware.
PB92-963228/CDH See 0172
EPA/540/8-91/025
National Priorities List Sites: Florida.
PB92-963250/CDH See 0175
EPA/540/8-91/026
National Priorities List Sites: Georgia.
PB92-963226/CDH See 0178
EPA/540/8-91/027
National Priorities List Sites: Idaho.
PB92-963219/CDH See 0182
EPA/540/8-91/028
National Priorities List Sites: Illinois.
PB92-963248/CDH See 0185
EPA/540/8-91/029
National Priorities List Sites: Indiana.
PB92-963249/CDH See 0188
EPA/540/8-91/030
National Priorities List Sites: Iowa.
PB92-963234/CDH See 0191
EPA/540/8-91/031
National Priorities List Sites: Kansas.
PB92-963213/CDH See 0194
EPA/540/8-91/032
National Priorities List Sites: Kentucky.
PB92-963227/CDH See 0197
EPA/540/8-91/033
National Priorities List Sites: Louisiana.
PB92-963222/CDH See 0200
EPA/540/8-91/034
National Priorities List Sites: Maine.
PB92-963204/CDH See 0203
EPA/540/8-91/035
National Priorities List Sites: Maryland.
PB92-963218/CDH See 0206
EPA/540/8-91/036
National Priorities List Sites: Massachusetts.
PB92-963206/CDH See 0209
EPA/540/8-91/037
National Priorities List Sites: Michigan.
PB92-963247/CDH See 0212
EPA/540/8-91/038
National Priorities List Sites: Minnesota.
PB92-963211 /CDH See 0215
EPA/540/8-91/039
National Priorities List Sites: Mississippi.
PB92-963224/CDH See 0218
EPA/540/8-91/040
National Priorities List Sites: Missouri.
PB92-963214/CDH See 0221
EPA/540/8-91/041
National Priorities List Sites: Montana.
PB92-963235/CDH See 0224
EPA/540/8-91/042
National Priorities List Sites: Nebraska.
PB92-963233/CDH See 0227
EPA/540/8-91/043
National Priorities List Sites: New Hampshire.
PB92-963205/CDH See 0230
EPA/54b/8-9;i>d44
National Priorities List Sites: New Jersey.
PB92-963241/CDH See 0233
Ml-
•it
-------
NUMBER INDEX
EPA/540/A5-91/001
EPA/540/8-91/045
National Priorities List Sites: New Mexico.
PB92-963232/CDH See 0236
EPA/540/8-91/046
National Priorities List Sites: New York.
PB92-963208/CDH See 0239
EPA/540/8-91/047
National Priorities List Sites: North Carolina.
PB92-963209/CDH See 0244
EPA/540/8-91/048
National Priorities List Sites: North Dakota and
South Dakota.
PB92-963236/CDH See 0246
EPA/540/8-91/049
National Priorities List Sites: Ohio.
PB92-963246/CDH See 0248
EPA/540/8-91/050
National Priorities List Sites: Oklahoma.
PB92-963221/CDH See 0251
EPA/540/8-91/051
National Priorities List Sites: Oregon.
PB92-963245/CDH See 0254
EPA/540/8-91/052
National Priorities List Sites: Pennsylvania.
PB92-963240/GDH See 0257
EPA/540/8-91/053
National Priorities List Sites: Rhode Island.
PB92-963230/CDH See 0263
EPA/540/8-91/054
National Priorities List Sites: South Carolina.
PB92-963210/CDH See 0267
EPA/540/8-91/055
National Priorities List Sites: Tennessee.
PB92-963225/CDH See 0270
EPA/540/8-91/056
National Priorities List Sites: Texas.
PB92-963212/CDH See 0273
EPA/540/8-91/057
National Priorities List Sites: Utah.
PB92-963215/CDH See 0277
EPA/540/8-91/058
National Priorities List Sites: Vermont.
PB92-963231/CDH See 0280
EPA/540/8-91/059
National Priorities List Sites: Virginia.
PB92-963217/CDH See 0283
EPA/540/8-91/060
National Priorities List Sites: Washington.
PB92-963244/CDH See 0286
EPA/540/8-91/061
National Priorities List Sites: West Virginia.
PB92-963229/CDH See 0289
EPA/540/8-91/062
National Priorities List Sites: Wisconsin.
PB92-963243/CDH See 0292
EPA/540/8-91/063
National Priorities List Sites: Wyoming.
PB92-963238/CDH See 0295
EPA/540/8-91/064
National Priorities List Sites: American Samoa,
Guam, and the Trust Territories.
PB92-963242/CDH See 0154
EPA/540/8-91/065
National Priorities List Sites: Puerto Rico.
PB92-963207/CDH See 0260
EPA/540/8-91/069
NPL Characterization Project: National Results.
PB92-963304/CDH See 0355
EPA-540/8-91/070
NPL Characterization Project: Region 1 Re-
sults.
PB92-963305/CDH See 0356
EPA/540/8-91/072
NPL Characterization Project: Region 3 Re-
sults.
PB92-963307/CDH See 0357
EPA/540/8-91/073
NPL Characterization Project: Region 4 Re-
sults.
PB92-963308/CDH See 0358
EPA/540/8-91/074
NPL Characterization Project: Region 5 Re-
sults.
PB92-963309/CDH See 0359
EPA/540/8-91/075
NPL Characterization Project: Region 6 Re-
sults.
PB92-963310/CDH See 0360
EPA/540/8-91/076
NPL Characterization Project: Region 7 Re-
sults.
PB92-963311 /CDH See 0361
EPA/540/8-91/077
NPL Characterization Project: Region 8 Re-
sults.
PB92-963312/CDH See 0362
EPA/540/8-91/078
NPL Characterization Project: Region 9 Re-
sults.
PB92-963313/CDH See 0363
EPA/540/8-91/079
NPL Characterization Project: Region 10 Re-
sults.
PB92-963314/CDH See 0364
EPA/540/8-91/080
CERCLIS Characterization Project: National
Results.
PB92-963315/CDH See 0001
EPA/540/8-91/081
CERCLIS Characterization Project: Region 1
Results.
PB92-963316/CDH See 0002
EPA/540/8-91/082
CERCLIS Characterization Project: Region 2
Results.
PB92-963317/CDH See 0003
EPA/540/8-91/083
CERCLIS Characterization Project: Region 3
Results.
PB92-963318/CDH See 0004
EPA/540/8-91/084
CERCLIS Characterization Project: Region 4
Results.
PB92-963319/CDH See 0005
EPA/540/8-91/085
CERCLIS Characterization Project: Region 5
Results.
PB92-963320/CDH See 0006
EPA/540/8-91/086
CERCLIS Characterization Project: Region 6
Results.
PB92-963321/CDH See 0007
EPA/540/8-91/087
CERCLIS Characterization Project: Region 7
Results.
PB92-963322/CDH See 0008
EPA/540/8-91/088
CERCLIS Characterization Project: Region 8
Results.
PB92-963323/CDH See 0009
EPA/540/8-91/089
CERCLIS Characterization Project: Region 9
Results.
PB92-963324/CDH See 0010
EPA/540/8-91/090
CERCLIS Characterization Project Region 10
Results.
PB92-963325/CDH See 0011
EPA/540/8-91/093
Superfund Emergency Response Actions: A
Summary of Federally-Funded Removals. Fifth
Annual Report - Fiscal Year 1990.
PB92-963403/CDH See 0313
EPA/540/9-91/001
OSWER Source Book: Training and Technolo-
gy Transfer Resources.
PB92-102169/CDH See 1283
EPA/540/9-91/002
Innovative Treatment Technologies: Overview
and Guide to Information Sources.
PB92-179001/CDH See 1272
EPA/540/A5-89/003
Terra Vac In situ Vacuum Extraction System:
Applications Analysis Report.
PB90-119744/CDH See 1355
Terra Vac In situ Vacuum Extraction System:
Applications Analysis Report.
PB90-126665/CDH See 1356
EPA/540/A5-89/004
International Waste Technologies/Geo-Con In
situ Stabilization/Solidification: Applications
Analysis Report.
PB90-269085/CDH See 1557
EPA/540/A5-89/005
Soliditech, Inc. Solidification/Stabilization Proc-
ess: Applications Analysis Report.
PB91-129817/CDH See 1562
EPA/540/A5-89/008
American Combustion Pyretron Destruction
System. Applications Analysis Report.
PB90-258427/CDH See 1193
EPA/540/A5-89/011
Chemfix Technologies, Inc. Solidification/Stabi-
lization Process. Application Analysis Report.
PB91-187054/CDH See 1551
EPA/540/A5-89/012
Ultrox International Ultraviolet Radiation/Oxida-
tion Technology: Applications Analysis Report.
PB91-129759/CDH See 1364
EPA/540/A5-90/002
Applications Analysis Report: SITE Program,
CF Systems Organics Extraction System, New
Bedford, Massachusetts.
PB91 -113845/CDH See 1196
EPA/540/A5-90/007
DuPont/Oberlin Microfiltration Technology. Ap-
plications Analysis Report.
PB92-119023/CDH See 1584
EPA/540/A5-90/008
Toxic Treatments 'In-situ' Steam/Hot-Air Strip-
ping Technology. Applications Analysis Report.
PB91-181768/CDH See 1545
EPA/540/A5-91/001
Biological Treatment of Wood Preserving Site
Groundwater by BioTrol, Inc. Applications
Analysis Report.
PB91-227983/CDH See 1433
NU-9
-------
NUMBER INDEX
EPA/540/A5-91/002
AWD Technologies Integrated AquaDetox
JTrada Narne)/SVE Technology: Applications
i^naiysfe1 Report. ..................................
|S@92.2i8379/CDH See 1202
EPA/540/A5-91/qp2
BtoTrol SoH Washing System for Treatment of
a Wood Preserving Site: Applications Analysis
Report,
PB92-115245/CbH See 1492
EPA/540/A5-91/005
Hofsohoad Resource Development Company,
Inc. Flame Reactor Technology: Applications
Analysts Report.
P892-213214/CDH See 1263
EPA/540/A5-91/007
Roloch, Inc., Plasma Centrifugal Furnace: Ap-
pHcattons Analysis Report.
PB92-218791/CDH See 1295
EPA/540/A5-91/009
Pftoi-Scala Domonstration of a Slurry-Phase Bi-
ological Roactor for Creosote-Contaminated
Soil. Applications Analysis Report.
PB94-i24039/CpH See 1426
EPA/540/AR-92/602
Carvor-Groonfield Process (Trade Name) De-
hydro-tech Corporation. Applications Analysis
P«P°rt.
...... , ... ,8661207
' "'
lIppKcaUons"Analyis Report Silicate Technol-
ogy Corporation's Solidification/Stabilization
Technology for Organic and Inorganic Con-
taminants in Soils.
P893-172948/CDH See 1550
EPA/540/AR-92/01^
Mombfana Treatment of Wood Preserving Site
Groundwator by SBP Technologies, Inc. Appli-
" cations Analysis Report,
........ ., ....... ..... ,,
EPA/540/AR-92/015
Demonstration of a Trial Excavation at the
McCdl Superfund Site.
PB93-100121/CDH See 1226
EPA/540/AR-92/079
Resources Conservation Company B.E.S.T.
(Trade Name} Solvent Extraction Technology:
Application Analysis Report.
P894-105434/CDH See 1294
E|*A/540/AR-93/506
CWM PO'WW'ER (Trade Name) Evaporation-
Catalytic Oxidation Technology: Applications
Analysis Report.
PB94-124658/COH See 1225
EPA/540/AR-93/509
Aocutoch Pnoumatte Fracturing Extraction and
Hot Gas Injection. Phase 1. Applications Analy-
sis Report.
{^-117431(00^, ,.,,. See 1190
EPA/540/C-93/002
Hsafth and Safely Plan (HASP) User's Guide
fVirston 3.6/4.6).
e893-963414/CDH See 0917
EPA/540/C-93/003
field' Certi'flcaUon ..... Tracking System (FCTS).
Pier's GuJda, Version 2.1 1"
P893.96341S/ODH See 0909
EPA/540/F-93/004
Raquirod Contracts Management Training for
Regional Superfund Personnel.
P883-963258/CDH See 0065
EPA/540/F-93-005
Extending the Tracking of Analytical Services
to Potentially Responsible Party-Lead Super-
fund Sites (Supplemental Guidance on
OSWER Directive 9240.0-2A).
PB93-963502/CDH See 0986
EPA/546/F-93/U06
Reassignment of CLP Transportation Func-
tions.
PB93-963501/CDH See 0063
EPA/540/F-93-007
OSWER Integrated Health and Safety Stand-
ard Operating Practices.
PB93-963401/CDH See 0921
EPA/540/F-93/009
Permits and Permit 'Equivalency' Processes for
CERCLA On-Site Response Actions.
PB93-963325/CDH See 0435
EPA/540/F-93/010
Use of Time and Materials and Cost Reim-
bursement Subcontracts for Remedial Actions
under the Alternative Remedial Contracting
Strategy Contracts.
PB93-963282/CDH See 1141
EPA/540/F-93/011
Clarification of Delegation to Approve Consist-
ency Exemptions at NPL Sites.
PB93-963281/CDH See 0336
EPA/540/F-93/012
Guidance on Program Management Activities
under ARCS.
PB93-963280/CDH See 0026
EPA/540/F-93/013
Amendment to Historical Definitions of NPL
Deletion Start and Completion Dates.
PB93-963278/CDH See 0335
EPA/540/F-93/014
Identification of a Senior Superfund Official for
Addressing Special NPL Site-Related Issues.
PB93-963279/CDH See 0348
EPA/540/F-93/015
Performance Tracking under ARCS Contracts.
PB93-963276/CDH See 0061
EPA/540/F-93/016
Initiatives to Streamline the Alternative Reme-
dial Contracting Strategy (ARCS) Contracts'
Award Fee Process.
PB93-963275/CDH See 0033
EPA/540/F-93/017
Resources for Preparing Independent Govern-
ment Estimates for Remedial Contracting Work
Assignments.
PB93-963267/CDH See 0066
EPA/540/F-93/019
NPL Construction Completion Definition at
Bioremediation and Soil Vapor Extraction Sites.
PB93-963327/CDH See 0365
EPA/540/F-93/020
Technology Selection Guide for Wood Treater
Sites.
PB93-963329/CDH See 1122
EPA/540/F-93/024
Superfund Accelerated Cleanup Model
(SACM): Questions and Answers.
PB93-963286/CDH See 0121
EPA/540/F-93/029
Facility Response Plans.
PB93-963408/CDH See 0929
EPA/540/F-93/030
Guidance on Setting Priorities for NPL Candi-
date Sites.
PB93-963333/CDH See 0344
EPA/540/F-93/032
Questions and Answers on Release Notifica-
tion Requirements and Reportable Quantity
Adjustments.
PB93-963411/CDH See 1149
EPA/540/F-93/033
Expedited Response Actions.
PB93-963410/CDH
See 1003
EPA/540/F-93/035
Presumptive Remedy for CERCLA Municipal
Landfill Sites.
PB93-963339/CDH
See 1105
EPA/540/F-93/038
Integrating Removal and Remedial Site As-
sessment Investigations.
PB93-963341/CDH See 0939
EPA/540/F-93/039
Determination of Imminent and Substantial En-
dangerment for Removal Actions.
PB93-963416/CDH See 1000
EPA/540/F-93/041
Emergency Responders Agreements for Fund-
Lead Remedial Actions.
PB93-963418/CDH See 1001
EPA/540/F-93/042
Revisions to OMB Circular A-94 on Guidelines
and Discount Rates for Benefit-Cost Analysis.
PB93-963297/CDH See 1107
EPA/540/F-93/047
Presumptive Remedies: Policy and Procedures.
PB93-963345/CDH See 1103
EPA/540/F-93/048
Presumptive Remedies: Site Characterization
and Technology Selection for CERCLA Sites
with Volatile Organic Compounds in Soils.
PB93-963346/CDH See 1104
EPA/540/F-93/049
Data Quality Objectives Process for Superfund.
PB94-963207/CDH See 0982
EPA/540/F-93/050
Superfund Program and Information Manage-
ment Update. Volume 1, Number 1, November
1993.
PB94-963208/CDH See 0123
EPA/540/F-94/009
Conducting Non-Time-Critical Removal Actions
under CERCLA.
PB93-963422/CDH See 0999
EPA/540/F-94/015
Procedure for Use of USAGE Preplaced Con-
tracts to Expedite Superfund Cleanup Tasks.
PB94-963243/CDH See 1131
EPA/540/F-94/32
Military Base Closures: Guidance on EPA Con-
currence in the Identification of Uncontaminat-
ed Parcels under CERCLA Section 120(h)(4).
PB94-963249/CDH See 0899
EPA/540/G-87/003
Data Quality Objectives for Remedial Re-
sponse Activities: Development Process. Ex-
ample Scenario: RI/FS Activities at a Site with
Contaminated Soils and Ground Water.
PB96-272634/CDH See 6980
EPA/540/G-87/004
Data Quality Objectives for Remedial Re-
sponse Activities: Development Process. Ex-
ample Scenario: RI/FS Activities at a Site with
Contaminated Soils and Ground Water.
PB90-272634/CDH See 0980
NU-10
-------
NUMBER INDEX
EPA/540/R-92/016A
EPA/540/G-88/001
Citizens' Guidance Manual for the Technical
- Assistance Grant Program.
PB92-101435/CDH See 0463
Superfund Technical Assistance Grant (TAG)
Handbook.
PB91-238592/CDH See 0499
EPA/540/G-89/006
CERCLA Compliance with Other Laws Manual.
Part 1. Interim Final.
PB90-272535/CDH See 0409
EPA/540/G-89/008
ARCS (Alternative Remedial Contract Strategy)
Contracts Users' Manual.
PB90-108549/CDH See 0019
EPA/540/G-89/009
CERCLA (Comprehensive Environmental Re-
sponse, Compensation and Liability Act) Com-
pliance with Other Laws Manual: Part 2. Clean
Air Act and Other Environmental Statutes and
State Requirements.
PB90-148461 /CDH See 0413
EPA/540/G-89/010
Health and Safety Audit Guidelines: SARA Title
I, Section 126.
PB90-204157/CDH See 0916
EPA/540/G-90/001
Guidance on EPA Oversight of Remedial De-
signs and Remedial Actions Performed by Po-
tentially Responsible Parties.
PB90-226069/CDH See 1128
EPA/540/G-90/002
Scoper's Notes: An RI/FS Costing Guide.
Bringing in a Quality RI/FS on Time and Within
Budget.
PB90-258369/CDH See 1117
EPA/540/G-90/003
Hazmat Team Planning Guidance.
PB90-274523/CDH See 0915
EPA/540/G-90/004
Quality Assurance/Quality Control Guidance
for Removal Activities: Sampling QA/QC Plan
and Data Validation Procedures.
PB90-274481/CDH See 0993
EPA/540/G-90/005
CERCLA Site Discharges to POTWs: Guidance
Manual.
PB90-274531/CDH See 1576
EPA/540/G-90/006
Guidance on Expediting Remedial Design and
Remedial Action.
PB90-273871/CDH See 1129
EPA/540/G-90/007
Guidance on Remedial Actions for Superfund
Sites with PCB Contamination.
PB91-145466/CDH See 1260
Guidance on Remedial Actions for Superfund
Sites with PCB Contamination.
PB91-921206/CDH See 1261
EPA/540/G-90/008
Guidance for Data Useability in Risk Assess-
ment. Interim Report.
PB91-921208/CDH See 1032
EPA/540/G-91/001
Continuous Release-Emergency Response No-
tification System and Priority Assessment
Model: User's Manual for EPA Regions.
PB91-168450/CDH See 1144
EPA/540/G-91/002
Assessing Reports of Continuous Releases of
Hazardous Substances: A Guide for EPA Re-
gions.
PB91-921315/CDH
See 1142
EPA/540/G-91/003
Reporting Requirements for Continuous Re-
leases of Hazardous Substances: A Guide for
Facilities and Vessels on Compliance.
PB91-167593/CDH See 1150
EPA/540/G-91/004
Continuous Release-Emergency Response No-
tification System and Priority Assessment
Model: Model Documentation.
PB91-168468/CDH See 1143
EPA/540/G-91/005
Continuous Release - Emergency Response
Notification System. User's Manual for Indus-
try.
PB91-921287/CDH See 1145
EPA/540/G-91/010A
Guidance on Oversight of Potentially Respon-
sible Party Remedial Investigations and Feasi-
bility Studies. Volume 1.
PB91-228361/CDH See 1094
EPA/540/G-91/010B
Guidance on Oversight of Potentially Respon-
sible Party Remedial Investigations and Feasi-
bility Studies. Volume 2. Appendices.
PB91-228379/CDH See 1095
EPA/540/G-91/012
Contracting and Subcontracting Guide to the
Superfund Program.
PB92-963274/CDH See 0023
EPA/540/K-93/001
Superfund Technical Assistance Grants (Fact
Sheet).
PB93-963301 See 0503
EPA/540/K-93/002
Superfund Technical Assistance Grants
(TAGS) (Pamphlet).
PB93-963302 See 0505
EPA/540/K-93/003
Superfund Technical Assistance Grant (TAG)
Handbook: Applying for Your Grant.
PB93-963352 See 0500
Understanding Oil Spills and Oil Spill Re-
sponse.
PB93-963409/CDH See 0978
EPA/540/K-93/004
Superfund Technical Assistance Grant (TAG)
Handbook: The Application Forms with Instruc-
tions.
PB93-963353 See 0501
EPA/540/M5-91/005
Superfund Innovative Technology Evaluation
(SITE): Demonstration Bulletin. Flame Reactor,
Horsehead Resource Development Company,
Inc.
PB92-235613/CDH • See 1319
EPA/540/M-90/010
Tech Trends Number 3, December 1990.
PB93-206357/CDH See 1325
EPA/540/M-91/001
Tech Trends Number 4, March 1991.
PB93-206365/CDH See 1326
EPA/540/M-91/002
Tech Trends Number 5, May 1991.
PB93-206373/CDH See 1327
EPA/540/M-91/003
Abstract Proceedings: Superfund Technical
Support Project General Meeting. Held in
Athens, Georgia on December 3-6, 1990.
PB93-205862/CDH See 1187
EPA/540/N-92/001
Bioremediation: An Information Update on Ap-
plying Bioremediation to Site Cleanup.
PB93-126175/CDH See 1421
EPA/540/P-90/003
Removal Cost Management System: Version
3.2.
PB90-272691/CDH See 1009
EPA/540/P-90/005
Guidelines for the Cleanup of Clandestine Drug
Laboratories.
PB90-272709/CDH See 1007
EPA/540/P-90/006
Sampler's Guide to the Contract Laboratory
Program.
PB91-921330/CDH See 0071
EPA/540/P-91/001
Conducting Remedial Investigations/Feasibility
Studies for CERCLA Municipal Landfill Sites.
PB91-921205/CDH See 1084
EPA/540/P-91/002
User's Guide to the Contract Laboratory Pro-
gram.
PB91-921278/CDH See 0080
EPA/540/P-91/013
Guidance on Site Assessment Cooperative
Agreements.
PB92-224385/CDH See 0475
EPA/540/R-92/001
Technology Evaluation Report: Ogden Circulat-
ing Bed Combustor at the McColl Superfund
Site.
PB92-227289/CDH See 1344
EPA/540/R-92/005
Presentations EPA-State Soil Standards Con-
ference. Held in Crystal City, Virginia on Janu-
ary 29, 1991.
PB92-963350/CDH See 1524
EPA/540/R-92/009
Community Relations in Superfund: A Hand-
book.
PB92-963341/CDH See 0467
EPA/540/R-92/012
Superfund Innovative Technology Evaluation
Program: Spring Update to the Technology
Profiles. Fourth Edition.
PB92-233121/CDH See 1314
EPA/540/R-92/013A
Guide for Conducting Treatability Studies
under CERCLA: Chemical Dehalogenation.
PB92-169044/CDH See 1161
Guide for Conducting Treatability Studies
under CERCLA: Chemical Dehalogenation.
Final Report.
PB92-231307/CDH See 1162
EPA/540/R-92/013B
Chemical Dehalogenation Treatability Studies
under CERCLA: An Overview.
PB92-231299/CDH See 1153
Chemical Dehalogenation Treatability Studies
under CERCLA: An Overview.
PB92-169275/CDH See 1209
EPA/540/R-92/015
Technology Evaluation Report: Site Program
Demonstration of a Trial Excavation at the
McColl Superfund Site.
PB92-226448/CDH See 1349
EPA/540/R-92/016A
Guide for Conducting Treatability Studies
under CERCLA Solvent Extraction. Interim
Guidance.
PB92-239581/CDH See 1167
NU-11
-------
EPA/540/R-92/016B
NUMBER INDEX
EPA/540/R-92/016B
Gukte for Conducting Treatability Studies
under CERCLA: Solvent Extraction Quick Ref-
erence Fact Sheet
P892-239599/CDH See 1168
EPA7540/R-S2/617A
Technology Evaluation Report: Babcock and
WBcox Cyclone Furnace Vitrification Technolo-
gy. Volume 1.
PB92-222215/CDH See 1337
EPA/540/R-92/020
Suporfund Emergency Response Actions: A
Summary of Federally-Funded Removals. Sixth
Annual Report, Fiscal Year 1991.
P892-963421/CDH See 0315
EPA/640/R-92/021
Guidance for Performing Site Inspections
under GERCLA.
" ,'", See0343
Hazard Raning System Guidance Manual.
PB92-9e3377/CDH See 0346
See 0044
| ..........................
ffintof-Protoge Program. .....
PB83-963251/CDH
EPA/E40/R-92/071A
Guide for Conducting Treatability Studies
undor CERCLA.
PB93-126787/CDH See 1155
EPA/640/R-92/073
technical Guidance Document: Construction
Quality Management for Remedial Action and
Remedial Design Waste Containment Systems.
PB93-105625/CDH See 1334
EPA/540/R-92/074A
Gukie (or Conducting Treatability Studies
under' CERCLA: Thermal Desorptton Remedy
Selection. Interim Guidance.
P93-126597/CDH See 1170
,, . ,
Glde for Conducting Treatabiiity Studies
ufKhw CERCLA: Thermal Desorption Quick
Reference Fact Sheet.
PB93-121325/COH See 1169
EPA/540/R-92/076
Superfund Innovativa Technology Evaluation
Program: Progress and Accomplishments
Fiscal Year 1991. A 5th Report to Congress.
.• raas-iaesja./cwi ............... ..... see 13,1,3
EPA764b/R-92/077
Supertuod Innovative Technology Evaluation
Program: Technology Profiles, Fifth Edition.
PB93-163053/CDH See 1315
EPA/540/R-92/079A
technology Evaluation Report. SITE Program
Demonstration, Resources Conservation Com-
pany, Baste Extractive Sludge Treatment
(B.E.S.T. (Trade Name)), Grand Calumet River,
Gary, Indiana. Volume 1.
PB93.227122/CDH See 1593
Technology Evaluation Report. SITE Program
Demonstration, Resources Conservation Com-
pany, Basic Extractive Sludge Treatment
(8,ES.t. (trade Name)), Grand Calumet River,
Gary, Indiana. Volume 2. Part 1.
PB93-227130/CDH See 1594
EPA/540/R-92/079C
Technology Evaluation Report. SITE Program
Demonstration, Resources Conservation Com-
pany, Baste Extractive Sludge Treatment
(B.E.S.T. (Trade Name)), Grant Calumet River,
Gary, Indiana. Volume 2. Part 2.
PB93-227148/COII See 1595
EPA/540/R-92/079D
Technology Evaluation Report. SITE Program
Demonstration, Resources Conservation Com-
pany, Basic Extractive Sludge Treatment
(B.E.S.T. (Trade Name)), Grand Calumet River,
Gary, Indiana. Volume 2. Part 3.
PB93-227155/CDH See 1596
EPA/540/R-92/080
SITE-Emerging Technologies: Laser Induced
Photochemical Oxidative Destruction of Toxic
Organics in Leachates and Groundwaters.
PB93-131431/CDH See 1591
EPA/540/R-93/001
National Priorities List Sites: Alabama, 1992.
PB93-963201 See 0150
EPA/540/R-93/002
National Priorities List Sites: Alaska, 1992.
PB93-963202/CDH See 0153
EPA/540/R-93/003
National Priorities List Sites: Arizona and
Nevada, 1992.
PB93-963204/CDH See 0158
EPA/540/R-93/004
National Priorities List Sites: Arkansas, 1992.
PB93-963205/CDH See 0161
EPA/540/R-93/005
National Priorities List Sites: California and
Hawaii, 1992.
PB93-963206/CDH See 0164
EPA/540/R-93/006
National Priorities List Sites: Colorado, 1992.
PB93-963207/CDH See 0167
EPA/540/R-93/007
National Priorities List Sites: Connecticut,
1992.
PB93-963208/CDH See 0170
EPA/540/R-93/008
National Priorities List Sites: Delaware, 1992.
PB93-963209/CDH See 0173
EPA/540/R-93/009
National Priorities List Sites: Florida, 1992.
PB93-963210/CDH See 0176
EPA/540/R-93/010
National Priorities List Sites: Georgia, 1992.
PB93-963211 /CDH See 0179
EPA/540/R-93/011
National Priorities List Sites: Idaho, 1992.
PB93-963212/CDH See 0183
EPA/540/R-93/012
National Priorities List Sites: Illinois, 1992.
PB93-963213/CDH See 0186
EPA/540/R-93/013
National Priorities List Sites: Indiana, 1992.
PB93-963214/CDH See 0189
EPA/540/R-93/014
National Priorities List Sites: Iowa, 1992.
PB93-963215/CDH See 0192
EPA/540/R-93/015
National Priorities List Sites: Kansas, 1992.
PB93-963216/CDH See 0195
EPA/540/R-93/016
National Priorities List Sites: Kentucky, 1992.
PB93-963217/CDH See 0198
EPA/540/R-93/017
National Priorities List Sites: Louisiana, 1992.
PB93-963218/CDH See 0201
EPA/540/R-93/018
National Priorities List Sites: Maine, 1992.
PB93-963219/CDH See 0204
EPA/540/R-93/019
National Priorities List Sites: Maryland, 1992.
PB93-963220/CDH See 0207
EPA/540/R-93/020
National Priorities List Sites: Massachusetts,
1992.
PB93-963221/CDH See 0210
EPA/540/R-93/021
National Priorities List Sites: Michigan, 1992.
PB93-963222/CDH See 0213
EPA/540/R-93/022
National Priorities List Sites: Minnesota, 1992.
PB93-963223/CDH See 0216
EPA/540/R-93/023
National Priorities List Sites: Mississippi, 1992.
PB93-963224/CDH See 0219
EPA/540/R-93/024
National Priorities List Sites: Missouri, 1992f
PB93-963225/CDH See 0222
EPA/540/R-93/025
National Priorities List Sites: Montana, 1992.
PB93-963226/CDH See 0225
EPA/540/R-93/026
National Priorities List Sites: Nebraska, 1992.
PB93-963227/CDH See 0228
EPA/540/R-93/027
National Priorities List Sites: New Hampshire,
1992.
PB93-963228/CDH See 0231
EPA/540/R-93/028
National Priorities List Sites: New Jersey, 1992.
PB93-963229/CDH See 0234
EPA/540/R-93/029
National Priorities List Sites: New Mexico,
1992.
PB93-963230/CDH See 0237
EPA/540/R-93/030
National Priorities List Sites: New York, 1992.
PB93-963231/CDH See 0240
EPA/540/R-93/031
National Priorities List Sites: North Carolina,
1992.
PB93-963232/CDH See 0245
EPA/540/R-93/032
National Priorities List Sites: North and South
Dakota, 1992.
PB93-963233/CDH See 0242
EPA/540/R-93/033
National Priorities List Sites: Ohio, 1992.
PB93-963234/CDH See 0249
EPA/540/R-93/034
National Priorities List Sites: Oklahoma, 1992.
PB93-963235/CDH See 0252
EPA/540/R-93/035
National Priorities List Sites: Oregon, 1992.
PB93-963236/CDH See 0255
EPA/540/R-93/036
National Priorities List Sites: Pennsylvania,
1992.
PB93-963237/CDH See 0258
EPA/540/R-93/037
National Priorities List Sites: Rhode Island,
1992.
PB93-963239/CDH See 0264
EPA/540/R-93/038
National Priorities List Sites: South Carolina,
1992.
PB93-963240/CDH See 0268
Ny-12
ii:
-------
NUMBER INDEX
EPA/540/R-94/018
EPA/540/R-93/039
National Priorities List Sites: Tennessee, 1992.
PB93-963241/CDH See 0271
EPA/540/R-93/040
National Priorities List Sites: Texas, 1992.
PB93-963242/CDH See 0274
EPA/540/R-93/041
National Priorities List Sites: Utah, 1992.
PB93-963243/CDH See 0278
EPA/540/R-93/042
National Priorities List Sites: Vermont, 1992.
PB93-963244/CDH See 0281
EPA/540/R-93/043
National Priorities List Sites: Virginia, 1992.
PB93-963245/GDH See 0284
EPA/540/R-93/044
National Priorities List Sites: Washington,
1992.
PB93-963246/CDH See 0287
EPA/540/R-93/045
National Priorities List Sites: West Virginia,
1992.
PB93-963247/CDH , See 0290
EPA/540/R-93/046
National Priorities List Sites: Wisconsin, 1992.
PB93-963248/CDH See 0293
EPA/540/R-93/047
National Priorities List Sites: Wyoming, 1992.
PB93-963249/CDH See 0296
EPA/540/R-93/048
National Priorities List Sites: Puerto Rico and
Virgin Islands, 1992.
PB93-963238/CDH See 0261
EPA/540/R-93/049
National Priorities List Sites: The United States
Territories, 1992.
PB93-963203/CDH See 0275
EPA/540/R-93/051
Specifications and Guidance for Contaminant-
Free Sample Containers.
PB93-963316/CDH See 0994
EPA/540/R-93/053
Compendium of Good Ideas: Models of Suc-
cess and Lessons Learned. Volume 1. High-
lights.
PB93-963271/CDH , See 0133
EPA/540/R-93/054
Compendium of Good Ideas: Models of Suc-
cess and Lessons Learned. Volume 2. Source
Book.
PB93-963272/CDH See 0134
EPA/540/R-93/055
Superfund: EPA/ICMA Superfund Revitaliza-
tion Conference. Held in Chicago, Illinois on
November 12-13, 1992.
PB93-963274/CDH See 0319
EPA/540/R-93/057
Guidance on Conducting Non-Time-Critical Re-
moval Actions under CERCLA.
PB93-963402/CDH See 1005
EPA/540/R-93/059
Compendium of ROD Language for FY 1993
Focus Areas.
PB93-963328/CDH See 1083
EPA/540/R-93/067
Superfund Administrative Improvements. Exec-
utive Summary.
PB93-963294/CDH See 0310
EPA/540/R-93/068
Superfund Administrative Improvements. Final
Report.
PB93-963295/CDH See 0311
EPA/540/R-93/071
Data Quality Objectives Process for Superfund.
PB94-963205/CDH See 0981
Data Quality Objectives Process for Superfund:
Interim Final Guidance.
PB94-963203/CDH See 0983
EPA/540/R-93/072
Superfund Reauthorization: NACEPT Subcom-
mittee Handbook.
PB93-963298/CDH See 0331
EPA/540/R-93/073
Evaluation of the Likelihood of DNAPL Pres-
ence at NPL Sites: National Results.
PB93-963343/CDH See 1448
EPA/540/R-93/077
Superfund: EPA/ICMA Superfund Revitaliza-
tion Conference. Held in San Francisco, Cali-
fornia on February 1-2, 1993.
PB94-963202/CDH See 0320
EPA/540/R-93/078
Data Quality Objectives Process for Superfund:
Workbook.
PB94-963204/CDH See 0984
EPA/540/R-93/079
FACT BOOK: National Priorities List under the
Original Hazard Ranking System, 1981-1991.
PB93-963350/CDH See 0340
EPA/540/R-93/080
Guidance for Evaluating the Technical Imprac-
ticability of Ground-Water Restoration.
PB93-963507/CDH See 1460
EPA/540/R-93/084
Superfund Revitalization: Measures of Suc-
cess.
PB94-963217/CDH See 0334
EPA/540/R-93/501
Technology Evaluation Report: Perox-Pure
(Trade Name) Chemical Oxidation Technology.
PB93-213528/CDH See 1345
EPA/540/R-93/506A
Chemical Waste Management, Inc.
PO*WW*ER (Trade Name) Evaporation-Cata-
lytic Oxidation Technology. Technology Eval-
uation Report. Volume 1.
PB94-160637/CDH See 1213
EPA/540/R-93/506B
Chemical Waste Management, Inc.
PO*WW*ER (Trade Name) Evaporation-Cata-
lytic Oxidation Technology. Technology Evalu-
tion Report. Volume 2.
PB94-160660/CDH See 1214
EPA/540/R-93/507
SITE Emerging Technologies Project: Babcock
and Wilcox Cyclone Vitrification.
PB93-163038/CDH See 1303
EPA/540/R-93/508
Technology Evaluation Report: SITE Program
Demonstration. EPA RREL's Mobile Volume
Reduction Unit
PB94-136264/CDH See 1348
EPA/540/R-93/509
Technology Evaluation Report: Site Program
Demonstration Test. Accutech Pneumatic
Fracturing Extraction and Hot Gas Injection,
Phase 1. Volume 1.
PB93-216596/CDH See 1352
EPA/540/R-93/510
BioGenesis (Trade Name) Soil Washing Tech-
nology: Innovative Technology Evaluation
Report.
PB94-120045/CDH See 1490
EPA/540/R-93/515
Emerging Technology Report: Metals Treat-
ment at Superfund Sites by Absorptive Filtra-
tion.
PB93-231165/CDH See 1232
EPA/540/R-93/517
Technology Evaluation Report: Toronto Har-
bour Commissioners (THC) Soil Recycle Treat-
ment Train.
PB93-216067/CDH See 1543
Toronto Harbour Commissioners (THC) Soil
Recycle Treatment Train. Applications Analysis
Report.
PB94-124674/CDH See 1544
EPA/540/R-93/518
Superfund Innovative Technology Evaluation
(SITE) Program Evaluation Report for Antox
BTX Water Screen (BTX Immunoassay).
PB93-218337/CDH See 1320
EPA/540/R-93/519A
Guide for Conducting Treatability Studies
under CERCLA: Biodegradation Remedy Se-
lection. Interim Guidance.
PB94-117470/CDH See 1159
EPA/540/R-93/519B
Guide for Conducting Treatability Studies
under CERCLA: Biodegradation Remedy Se-
lection. Quick Reference Fact Sheet.
PB94-144136/CDH See 1160
EPA/540/R-93/521
Site Emerging Technologies: Bioscrubber for
Removing Hazardous Organic Emissions from
Soil, Water and Air Decontamination Process-
es.
PB93-227205/CDH See 1302
EPA/540/R-93/523
Handbook for Constructed Wetlands Receiving
Acid Mine Drainage.
PB93-233914/CDH See 1588
EPA/540/R-93/525
Superfund Innovative Technology Evaluation
Program: Annual Report to Congress 1992.
PB94-123874/CDH See 1309
EPA/540/R-93/526
Superfund Innovative Technology Evaluation
Program: Technology Profiles, Sixth Edition.
PB94-123858/CDH See 1318
EPA/540/R-94/012
USEPA Contract Laboratory Program National
Functional Guidelines for Organic Data
Review.
PB94-963501/CDH See 0077
EPA/540/R-94/013
USEPA Contract Laboratory Program National
Functional Guidelines for Inorganic Data
Review.
PB94-963502/CDH See 0997
EPA/540/R-94/014
Audit Management Process. Reference Guide.
PB94-963232/CDH See 0085
EPA/540/R-94/015
SRIS System Overview and User's Guide.
PB94-963233/CDH See 0112
EPA/540/R-94/016
Progress Toward Implementing Superfund,
Fiscal Year 1991. Report to Congress.
PB94-963234/CDH See 0302
EPA/540/R-94/018
Technical Background Document for Draft Soil
Screening Level Guidance.
PB94-963503/CDH See 1537
NU-13
-------
EPA/540/R-94/021
NUMBER INDEX
EPA/54Q/R-94/P21
Suporfund Program Management Manual,
Fiscal Year 1994.
PB94-963247/CDH See 0073
EPA/540/S5-89/011
Suporfund Innovative Technology Evaluation
Technology Demonstration Summary: Chemfix
SolidincaUon/Stabilization Process, Clackamas,
Oregon.
PB91-921373/CDH See 1564
EPA/S40/S5-90/007
Technology Demonstration Summary, DuPont/
Cjjeflin"" Microfiltrajon System, Palmerton,
Pennsylvania. April-May 1992.
PB92-224351/COH See 1336
EPA/540/S5-91/003
Technology Demonstration Summary: Bio Trol
So» Washing System for Treatment of a Wood
Preserving Site.
P892.224393/a}H See 1538
EP|/54Q;/g5.9J;/OQi5,
'florsefiead Resource Development Company,
Inc., Ram* Reactor Technology. Technology
Demonstration Summary.
P893.14S639/CDH See 1264
EPA/540/S-92/001
Chemical Enhancements to Pump-and-Treat
Remediation. Ground Water Issue.
PB92-180074/COH See 1434
EPA/S40/S-92/OQ3
lil.«
-------
NUMBER INDEX
EPA/600/A-92/079
EPA/542/R-92/012
Cleaning Up the Nation's Waste Sites: Markets
and Technology Trends.
PB93-140762/GDH See 0132
EPA/560/2-90/001
SARA (Superfund Amendments and Reauthor-
ization Act) Section 313 Roadmaps Data Base.
User's Manual. Version 2.10.
PB90-174855/CDH See 0304
EPA/560/S-89/003
Identification of SARA (Superfund Amend-
ments and Reauthorization Act) Compounds in
Adipose Tissue.
PB90-132564/CDH See 1055
EPA/600/2-90/002
New Approach and Methodologies for Charac-
terizing the Hydrogeologic Properties of
Aquifers.
PB90-187063/CDH See 1470
EPA/600/2-91/050
Evaluation of Alternative Treatment Technol-
ogies for CERCLA Soils and Debris (Summary
of Phase 1 and Phase 2).
PB91-240572/CDH See 1504
EPA/600/2-91/058
Pilot-Scale Incineration of Contaminated Soil
from the Purity Oil Sales and McColl Super-
fund Sites.
PB92-105857/CDH See 1290
EPA/600/3-89/074
Toxicity Bioassay and Eluate Heavy Metals
Analysis Results of the Bench Scale Stabiliza-
tion Study of Soils from the United Chrome
Superfund NPL (National Priority List) Site Cor-
vallis, Oregon.
PB90-120049/CDH See 1546
EPA/600/3-90/015
Metals Testing Report: Metal Content of Envi-
ronmental Samples from Region 4.
PB90-187105/CDH See 1282
EPA/600/3-91/011
Biological Assessment of Toxicity Caused by
Chemical Constituents Eluted from Site Soils
Collected at the Drake Chemical Superfund
Site, Lock Haven, Clinton Co., Pennsylvania.
PB91-186965/CDH See 1491
EPA/600/3-91/046
Application of a Water Quality Assessment
Modeling System at a Superfund Site.
PB92-164490/CDH See 1573
EPA/600/3-91/071
Superfund Innovative Technology Evaluation:
The Delaware SITE Study, 1989.
PB92-125749/CDH See 1322
EPA/600/4-90/013
Rationale for the Assessment of Errors in the
Sampling of Soils.
PB90-242306/CDH See 1526
EPA/600/4-90/034
Evaluation of Exposure Markers.
PB91-144675/CDH See 1246
EPA/600/4-91/028
Superfund Innovative Technology Evaluation
Program Demonstration Plan for Westinghouse
Bio-Analytic Systems Pentachlorophenol Im-
munoassays.
PB92-170190/CDH See 1310
EPA/600/8-88/054
Health Effects Assessment for Styrene.
PB90-142357/CDH See 1046
EPA/600/8-88/058
Health Effects Assessment for 2,4,5-Trichloro-
phenoxy Acetic Acid (2,4,5-T).
PB90-142365/CDH See 1050
EPA/600/8-89/053
Methodology for Evaluating Potential Carcino-
genicity in Support of Reportable Quantity Ad-
justments Pursuant to CERCLA Section 102.
PB93-230027/CDH See 1146
EPA/600/8-89/084
Framework for Real-Time Decision-Making:
New Bedford Harbor Pilot Dredging Study.
PB90-150822/CDH See 1587
EPA/600/8-89/085
Updated Health Effects Assessment for Ace-
tone.
PB90-142373/CDH See 1080
EPA/600/8-89/086
Health Effects Assessment for Benzene.
PB90-142381/CDH See 1035
EPA/600/8-89/087
Health Effects Assessment for Cadmium.
PB90-142399/CDH See 1036
EPA/600/8-89/088
Health Effects Assessment for Carbon Tetra-
chloride.
PB90-142407/CDH See 1037
EPA/600/8-89/089
Health Effects Assessment for Chlordane.
PB90-142415/CDH See 1038
EPA/600/8-89/090
Health Effects Assessment for Chloroform.
PB90-142423/CDH See 1040
EPA/600/8-89/091
Health Effects Assessment for DDT.
PB90-142431/CDH See 1041
EPA-600/8-89/092
Health Effects Assessment for Methylene
Chloride.
PB90-142449/CDH See 1043
EPA/600/8-89/093
Health Effects Assessment for Methyl Ethyl
Ketone.
PB90-142456/CDH See 1042
EPA/600/8-89/094
Health Effects Assessment for Naphthalene.
PB90-142464/CDH See 1044
EPA/600/8-89/095
Health Effects Assessment for Phenol.
PB90-142472/CDH See 1045
EPA/600/8-89/096
Health Effects Assessment for Tetrachloroeth-
ylene.
PB90-142480/CDH See 1047
EPA/600/8-89/097
Health Effects Assessment for Trichloroethy-
lene.
PB90-142498/CDH See 1048
EPA/600/8-89/098
Health Effects Assessment for Xylenes.
PB90-142506/CDH See 1049
EPA/600/8-89/099
Health Effects Assessment for Chlorobenzene.
PB90-142514/CDH See 1039
EPA/600/8-90/046
Measurement of Hydraulic Conductivity Distri-
butions: A Manual of Practice.
PB91-211938/CDH See 1467
EPA/600/8-90/052
Evaluation of Emission Factors for Formalde-
hyde from Certain Wood Processing Oper-
ations. Final Report, May-August 1989.
PB90-254988/CDH See 1410
EPA-600/8-91/008
Characterizing soils for hazardous waste site
assessments.
DE91014097/CDH See 1495
EPA/600/9-89/072
International Conference on New Frontiers for
Hazardous Waste Management (Third) Pro-
ceedings. Held in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania on
September 10-13,1989.
PB90-127200/CDH See 1278
EPA/600/9-90/012
Operations and Research at the U.S. EPA In-
cineration Research Facility: Annual Report for
FY89.
PB90-186339/CDH See 1482
EPA/600/9-90/034
Role of Health Research in Support of EPA's
Regulatory Programs.
PB91-211912/CDH See 1074
EPA/600/9-91/010
Operations and Research at the U.S. EPA In-
cineration Research Facility: Annual Report for
FY90.
PB91-182493/CDH See 1483
EPA/600/9-91/028
International Symposium on Field Screening
Methods for Hazardous Wastes and Toxic
Chemicals (2nd), Proceedings. Held in Las
Vegas, Nevada on February 12-14, 1991.
PB92-125764/CDH See 1279
EPA/600/9-91/049
Abstracts of Phase 1 and Phase 2 Awards:
Small Business Innovation Research Program
1991.
PB94-146495/CDH See 0016
EPA/600/A-92/003
EPA SITE Demonstration of the Horsehead
Resource Development Company Flame Reac-
tor Technology.
PB92-139401/CDH See 1242
EPA/600/A-92/010
Superfund Soils Data Management System.
PB92-139476/CDH See 1536
EPA/600/A-92/012
Quality and Environmental Protection: The
EPA QA Program.
PB92-143791 /CDH See 0990
EPA/600/A-92/019
Control Technologies for Defunct lead Battery
Recycling Sites: Overview and Recent Devel-
opments. Volume 3.
PB92-150416/CDH See 1220
EPA/600/A-92/030
Developments in Chemical Treatment of Con-
taminated Soil.
PB92-152933/CDH See 1499
EPA/600/A-92/031
PAST: The Potential ARARs Selection Tool.
PB92-152941 /CDH See 0434
EPA/600/A-92/079
Incineration Data on Arsenic and Lead Emis-
sions.
PB92-179043/CDH See 1267
NU-15
-------
EPA/6QO/A-92/091
NUMBER INDEX
EPA/600/A-92/091
Demonstration of Waste Treatment Technol-
oglos,
PB92:179670{CDH, ..... , ................... See 1229
EPA7600/A-92/174
Bospirometrtc Methods for Determination of
Bfextegradability and Blodegradatfon Kinetics
for Hazardous Organic Pollutant Compounds.
P892-217108/CDH See 1427
EPA/$00/A-92/183
Devstopment of Emerging Technologies within
fb« SITE Program.
PS92.217322/CH See 1231
.........
'(Sot-Scale Incineration "of" PCB-Contaminated
Sediments from the Hot Spot of the New Bed-
ford Harbor Superfund Site.
P882:227321/CDH See 1291
EPA/600M42/207
Asymmetric Loss Function for Superfund Re-
mediation Decisions.
PB93.106763/CDH See 1200
EPA/600/A-92/2X9
Evaluation of Commercially-Available Portable
Gas Chromatographs.
PS93-121051/CDH See 1478
EPA/600/A-92/28S
Small Systems Meet Superfund Challenge with
Point-of-Entry Treatment Units.
PB83-1411Q8/CDH See 1304
EPA/600/A-93/007
Postal for Joint Rgsearch between EPA and
ttjf U.S. Anjiy.
PB83.149227/CDH See 1293
EPA/600/A-93/052
Estimation of the Cost of Using Chemical Pro-
t9ctiv-8 Clothing.
PB93-168805/CDH See 1244
EPA/600/A-93/053
Evaluation of Portable Gas Chromatographs.
B93-168813/CDH See 147,9
'
See 1411
ni of Volatile Srgante Compounds
during Start-Up of Bloromediation of French
United Supoflund Site in Crosby Texas Using
Wind Dependent Whole-Air Sampling.
PS93-168821/CDH See 1414
EPA/80p/A:93/227 ....................
Foam Scrubbing (Chapter 9).
Pl93.2365eb/CDH
EPA/eOO/A-93/249
iSi Sol Working "Work "for' the Sand Creek
Supoffund Site.
PB94-112828/CDH See 1548
EPA/600/A-94/002
Application of 'Real-Time' Monitoring in Deci-
sion Making: The New Bedford Harbor Pilot
Dredging Project,
PBS4-130747/CDH See 1574
EPA/600/A-94/005
Advanced Oxidation Technologies for the
Treatment of Contaminated Groundwater.
PB94-137353/CDH See 1429
EPi/60p/A:94/<}68 ............................
Potential Surrogate Metals for Incinerator Trial
Bums.
PB94-162716/CDH See 1486
EPA/600/D-89/119
lo-s!tu Stabilization/Solidification of PCB (Poly-
cWortnated BiphenylsJ-Contaminated Soil.
P890-1 13291 /CDH See 1556
EPA/600/D-89/135
EPA/ORD (Environmental Protection Agency/
Office of Research and Development) Role
and Perspective in Sediment Research.
PB90-113093/CDH See 1585
EPA/600/D-89/250
Recent Advances in Risk Reduction Engineer-
ing.
PB90-129339/CDH See 1064
EPA/600/D-90/015
Field Evaluation of the UV/Oxidation Technol-
ogy to Treat Contaminated Groundwater. Pro-
ceedings of the National Conference (10th).
Held in Washington, DC. on November 27-29,
1989.
PB90-221672/CDH See 1453
EPA/600/D-90/088
Guidance Documents Relating to Landfills and
Contaminants.
PB90-261835/CDH See 1259
EPA/600/D-90/089
Remediation Completed: But Is the Ground-
water Meeting the Safe Drinking Water Act Re-
quirements. Haztech International 90. Held in
Houston, Texas on May 8-10,1990.
PB90-262999/CPH See 1473
EPA/600/D-90/152
Quantifying Effects in Ecological Site Assess-
ments: Biological and Statistical Consider-
ations.
PB91-129189/CDH See 1063
EPA/600/D-90/232
Results from the Stabilization Technologies
Evaluated by the Site Program. New England
Environmental Expo 90.
PB91-162479/CDH See 1558
EPA/600/D-91/008
Future of Expert Systems in the Environmental
Protection Agency.
PB91-162727/CDH See 1257
EPA/600/D-91/014
Factors Affecting the Applicability of Plasma
Systems to the Cleanup of Superfund Sites.
PB91-162784/CDH See 1250
EPA/600/D-91/036
Demonstration Projects Under the U.S. EPA
Superfund Innovative Technology Evaluation
Program.
PB91-176891/CDH See 1230
EPA/600/D-91/037
Demonstration of Hazardous Waste Site Treat-
ment Technologies.
PB91-176909/CDH See 1227
EPA/600/D-91/059
Control of Transient Incinerator Emissions with
an Oxygen Based Combustion System.
PB91-182725/CDH See 1401
EPA/600/D-91/072
Sector Sampling for VOC's during Remediation
of Superfund Site at Shaver's Farm, Georgia.
PB91-182840/CDH See 1417
EPA/600/D-91/097
Evaluating Amphibian Responses in Wetlands
Impacted by Mining Activities in the Western
United States.
PB91-191106/CDH See 1586
EPA/600/D-91/115
Use of a Fourier Transform Spectrometer as a
Remote Sensor at Superfund Sites.
PB91-199844/CDH See 1365
EPA/600/D-91/130
Aseptic Sampling of Unconsolidated Heaving
Soils in Saturated Zones.
PB91-216218/CDH See 1489
EPA/600/D-91/141
Importance of Quality for Collection of Environ-
mental Samples. Planning, Implementing, and
Assessing Field Sampling Quality at CERCLA
Sites.
PB91-218941/CDH See 0919
EPA/600/D-91/176
Pilot-Scale Incinerability Evaluation of Arsenic-
and Lead-Contaminated Soils from Two Super-
fund Sites.
PB91-226308/CDH See 1288
EPA/600/D-91/201
Cost Estimating Systems for Remedial Action
Projects.
PB91-231191/CDH See 1123
EPA/600/D-91/211
Evaluation and Testing of a Protocol to Deter-
mine the Aerobic Degradation Potential of Haz-
ardous Waste Constituents in Soil.
PB91-233296/CDH See 1503
EPA/600/D-91/221
Harmonization of QA Procedures for Environ;
mental Data Operations: Development of a Na-
tional Consensus Standard for Quality Assur-
ance for Environmental Programs.
PB91-240523/CDH See 0989
EPA/600/D-91/267
Toxlcological Implementations of Remediating
Hazardous Wastes.
PB92-124171 /CDH See 1359
EPA/600/D-91/275
Application of a Plant Test System in the Iden-
tification of Potential Genetic Hazards at
Chemical Waste Sites.
PB92-124551/CDH See 1194
EPA/600/D-91/276
Removal of Creosote from Soil by Thermal De-
sorption.
PB92-126838/CDH See 1530
EPA/600/D-91/285
Prospects for In situ Chemical Treatment for
Contaminated Soil.
PB92-126929/CDH
See 1525
EPA/600/J-88/426
Use of 'Selenastrum capricornutum' to Assess
the Toxicity Potential of Surface and Ground
Water Contamination Caused by Chromium
Waste.
PB90-108242/CDH See 1367
EPA/600/J-89/003
Quality Assurance for the SITE (Superfund In-
novative Technology Evaluation) Program
Demonstrations.
PB90-159872/CDH See 0992
EPA/600/J-89/061
Evaluation of Modifications to Extraction Pro-
cedures Used in Analysis of Environmental
Samples from Superfund Sites.
PB90-103516/CDH See 1247
EPA/600/J-89/278
Filtration of Ground Water Samples for Metals
Analysis.
PB90-185182/CDH See 1454
EPA/600/J-89/325
Description of EPA SITE Demonstration of the
HAZCON Stabilization Process at the Doug-
lassville, Pennsylvania Superfund Site.
PB90-216334/CDH See 1552
NU-16
-------
NUMBER INDEX
EPA/600/J-93/512
EPA/600/J-89/419
Using the DMA Alkaline Unwinding Assay to
Detect DNA Damage in Laboratory and Envi-
ronmentally Exposed Cells and Tissues.
PB90-245770/CDH See 1368
EPA/600/J-89/520
EPA Site Demonstration of the Terra Vac In
situ Vacuum Extraction Process in Groveland,
Massachusetts. (Site Program Update: Part
VII).
PB91-182097/CDH See 1243
EPA/600/J-89/532
SITE Demonstration of the American Combus-
tion Pyretron Oxygen-Enhanced Burner.
PB91-196246/CDH See 1299
EPA/600/J-90/021
SITE Demonstration of the CHEMFIX Solidifi-
cation/Stabilization Process at the Portable
Equipment Salvage Company Site.
PB90-217621/CDH See 1559
EPA/600/J-90/117
Management Systems Review of the Super-
fund RI/FS: Opportunities for Streamlining.
PB90-264136/CDH See 1101
EPA/600/J-90/275
SITE Demonstration of the CF Systems Organ-
ics Extraction System.
PB91-145110/CDH See 1301
EPA/600/J-90/360
Field Demonstration of the UV/Oxidation
Technology to Treat Ground Water Contami-
nated with VOCs.
PB91 -163741 /CDH See 1452
EPA/600/J-90/361
Control Technology: Estimating Innovative
Technology Costs for the SITE Program.
PB91-163758/CDH See 1222
EPA/600/J-90/413
EPA SITE Demonstration of the International
Waste Technologies/Geo-Con In situ Stabiliza-
tion/Solidification Process.
PB91-171686/CDH See 1553
EPA/600/J-90/414
Use of Electrokinetics for Hazardous Waste
Site Remediation.
PB91-171694/CDH See 1366
EPA/600/J-91/010
Evaluating the Effectiveness of Ground Water
Extraction Systems.
PB91-177386/CDH See 1443
EPA/600/J-91/012
Incineration Treatment of Arsenic-Contaminat-
ed Soil.
PB91-183541/CDH See 1268
EPA/600/J-91/029
Development and Use of Site-Specific Chemi-
cal and Biological Criteria for Assessing New
Bedford Harbor Pilot Dredging Project.
PB91-182329/CDH See 1583
EPA/600/J-91/034
EPA Site Demonstration of BioTrol Aqueous
Treatment System.
PB91-182279/CDH See 1441
EPA/600/J-91/153
New Methods for Modeling the Transport of
Metals from Mineral Processing Wastes into
Surface Waters.
PB91-219097/CDH See 1590
EPA/600/J-91/227
On-Site Methods for Assessing Chemical
Impact on the Soil Environment Using Earth-
worms: A Case Study at the Baird and
McGuire Superfund Site, Holbrook, Massachu-
setts.
PB92-108166/CDH See 1521
EPA/600/J-91/279
Extraction of Mercury from Groundwater Using
Immobilized Algae.
PB92-121367/CDH See 1450
EPA/600/J-91/300
U.S. EPA SITE Demonstration of AWD Tech-
nologies' AquaDetox/SVE System.
PB92-124387/CDH See 1363
EPA/600/J-91/328
Biodegradation of Creosote and Pentachloro-
phenol in Contaminated Groundwater: Chemi-
cal and Biological Assessment.
PB92-129659/CDH See 1432
EPA/600/J-91/331
Bench-Scale Evaluation of Alternative Biologi-
cal Treatment Processes for the Remediation
of Pentachlorophenol- and Creosote-Contami-
nated Materials: Slurry-Phase Bioremediation.
PB92-129683/CDH See 1419
EPA/600/ J-91/335
Bench-Scale Evaluation of Alternative Biologi-
cal Treatment Processes for the Remediation
of Pentachlorophenol- and Creosote-Contami-
nated Materials: Solid-Phase Bioremediation.
PB92-129725/CDH See 1420
EPA/600/J-91/336
Detoxification of Pentachlorophenol and Creo-
sote Contaminated Groundwater by Physical
Extraction: Chemical and Biological Assess-
ment.
PB92-129733/CDH See 1438
EPA/600/J-92/003
Evaluation of Waste Stabilized by the Solidi-
tech SITE Technology.
PB92-136878/CDH See 1554
EPA/600/J-92/009
Demonstration of Microfiltration Technology.
PB92-136936/CDH See 1228
EPA/600/J-92/030
Control of Aromatic Waste Air Streams by Soil
Bioreactors.
PB92-144021/CDH See 1496
EPA/600/J-92/051
EPA SITE Demonstration of the BioTrol Soil
Washing Process.
PB92-150655/CDH See 1502
EPA/600/J-92/140
Personnel Protection through Reconnaissance
Robotics at Superfund Remedial Sites.
PB92-166743/CDH See 1286
EPA/600/J-92/158
Behavior of Arsenic in a Rotary Kiln Incinerator
(Journal Version).
PB92-179845/CDH See 1204
EPA/600/J-92/205
Solidification/Stabilization: Is It Always Appro-
priate.
PB92-191188/CDH See 1560
EPA/600/J-92/246
Comparison: Organic Emissions from Hazard-
ous Waste Incinerators versus the 1990 Toxics
Release Inventory Air Releases.
PB92-206267/CDH See 1217
EPA/600/J-92/262
Long-Path FTIR Measurements of Volatile Or-
ganic Compounds in an Industrial Setting (July
1989-April 1991).
PB92-206424/CDH See 1413
EPA/600/J-92/263
Canister-Based Method for Monitoring Toxic
VOCs in Ambient Air.
PB92-206432/CDH See 1396
EPA/600/J-92/282
Application of Tradescantia Micronucleus
Assay for In situ Evaluation of Potential Genet-
ic Hazards from Exposure to Chemicals at a
Wood-Preserving Site.
PB92-217231/CDH See 1195
EPA/600/J-92/296
Control Technologies for Remediation of Con-
taminated Soil and Waste Deposits at Super-
fund Lead Battery Recycling Sites.
PB92-227388/CDH See 1221
EPA/600/J-92/403
Chemical Stabilization of Mixed Organic and
Metal Compounds. EPA SITE Program Demon-
stration of the Silicate Technology Corporation
Process.
PB93-131787/CDH See 1212
EPA/600/J-92/404
Solvent Extraction Processes: A Survey of
Systems in the SITE Program.
PB93-131795/CDH See 1305
EPA/600/J-93/006
Extraction and Recovery of Lead Species from
Soil.
PB93-150142/CDH
See 1506
EPA/600/J-93/007
Control Technology: 1992 Update of U.S.
EPA's Superfund Innovative Technology Eval-
uation (SITE) Emerging Technology Program.
PB93-150159/CDH See 1223
EPA/600/J-93/231
Alternating Current Electrocoagulation for Su-
perfund Site Remediation.
PB93-205144/CDH See 1192
EPA/600/J-93/272
Acid Volatile Sulfide Predicts the Acute Toxici-
ty of Cadmium and Nickel in Sediments.
PB93-222107/CDH See 1572
EPA/600/J-93/296
Removal of Radionuclides by Electrokinetic
Soil Processing.
PB93-222875/CDH See 1531
EPA/600/J-93/324
SITE Program Demonstration of the SBP
Technologies, Inc., Membrane Filtration
System on Creosote-Contaminated Water.
PB93-228567/CDH See 1592
EPA/600/ J-93/428
Engineering Bulletins: Aids to the Development
of Remedial Alternatives.
PB94-101797/CDH See 1236
EPA/600/J-93/429
SITE Demonstration of the Basic Extractive
Sludge Treatment Process.
PB94-101805/CDH See 1300
EPA/600/J-93/453
Comparison of Organic Emissions from Haz-
ardous Waste Incinerators versus the 1990
Toxic Release Inventory Air Releases.
PB94-112836/CDH See 1397
EPA/600/J-93/512
Treatment of Nonhazardous Petroleum-Con-
taminated Soils by Thermal Desorption Tech-
nologies.
PB94-135118/CDH See 1547
NU-17
-------
EPA/600/J-94/140
EPA/600/J-94/140
Sorptfon, Important In Stabilized/Solidified
Waste Forms.
P18MSS256/CDH See 1563
EPA/600/J-94/169
Renwdtation of Contaminated Soils by Solvent
Flushing.
PS94-162740/CDH Sea 1529
EPA/600/ J-94/174
Engineered Btofitter for Removing Organic
i Contaminants In Air.
PB94-163532/CDH See 1403
EPA/eOO/M-89/030
Aswssnwrt of Tentatively Identified Com-
pound* In Supariund Samples.
PB90-253816/CDH See 1199
EPA/600/R-92/014
Umitod-Usa Chemical Protective Clothing for
EPA Suparfund Activities.
PB92-143494/CDH See 1058
EPA/epq/R-92/032 ...........................................
; Suporfund Innovative Technology Evaluation
, (Site) Report for the Westjnghouse Bio-Analyt-
? : ; to Systems Pontachtorophenol (PCP) Immun-
' o*|sayk [[[
P§92-188713/CDH See 1321
EPA/600/R-92/051
Operations and Research at the U.S. EPA In-
cineration Research Facility: Annual Report for
FY91.
PS92-239540/CDH See 1484
EPA/§pq/R.92/g68 ..................................... ....................
Pfet-Scate Incineration of PCB-Contaminated
Sediments from the New Bedford Harbor Hot
Spot Suporfund Site.
f>Bi2.i78853/CDH See 1292
EPA/600/R-92/t37
, Evgluattpji pj, Porspnaj Cooling Devices for
;'.: ' Dtoxin C!ean-Up Operation.
pgi2.206895/COH See 1248
EPA/600/R-92/142
Oh-8lt» Engineering Report for the Low-Tem-
perature Thermal Desorption Pilot-Scale Test
on Contaminated Son.
.;,, / P8J2-2le93e/CDH See 1519
~ ™ ...... ' " " " ......... ' ' '
AufoMQUSE: An Improvement to the MOUSE
Computorized Uncertainty Analysis System
OpentiixMl Manual.
P893-100113/COH See 1201
........................................ "
Pilot-Scale Incineration of Contaminated
Sludges from the Bofors-Nobel Superfund Site.
PBa3-141034/COH See 1289
EPA/S&0/R-93/036 "'™l 'm^,,.,, ! ',' ,
• Pfi-Scala Incineration of ....... Contaminated Soil
from th« Chemical Insecticide Corporation Su-
pedund Stte.
P883-155968/CDH See 1523
EPA/eoq/R.93/047
F*pt-Sc«l« "incinora'tton of Comtaminated Soils
fro™ fha Drako Chemical Superfund Site.
PBQ3-163004/COH See 1522
EPA/600/R-93/066
Oo-Stt« Engineering Report of the Slurry-
Ph«s« Btdogfcal Reactor for Pilot-Scale Test-
Ing on Contaminated Soil.
PS93.1782S9/CDH See 1520
EPA/6QO/R-93/073
X-ray Fkxxcsconce Survey of Lead Contami-
nated Residential Sods In Leadville, Colorado:
A Case Study.
P883-203156/COH See 1549
NUMBER INDEX
EPA/600/R-93/087
Operations and Research at the U.S. EPA In-
cineration Research Facility: Annual Report for
FY92.
PB94-114659/CDH See 1485
EPA/600/R-93/133
Risk Reduction Engineering Laboratory Site
Remediation Technical Support Program: FY92
Annual Report.
PB93-217651/CDH See 1296
EPA/600/R-93/184
Evaluation of Unsaturated/Valdose Zone
Models for Superfund Sites.
PB94-157765/CDH See 1449
EPA/600/R-94/006
Literature Review Summary of Metals Extrac-
tion Processes Used to Remove Lead from
Soils.
PB94-140613/CDH See 1518
EPA/600/R-94/011
Annual RREL Research Symposium (20th) Ab-
stract Proceedings. Held in Cincinnati, Ohio on
March 15-17, 1994.
PB94-159092/CDH See 1184
EPA/600/R-94/028
Identification and Compilation of Unsaturated/
Vadose Zone Models.
PB94-157773/CDH See 1464
EPA/600/X-93/062
Summary of GIS Support to Superfund.
PB93-963506/CDH See 1307
EPA/625/R-92/012
Control of Air Emissions from Superfund Sites.
PB93-215614/CDH See 1400
EPA/650/R-92/017B
Technology Evaluation Report: Babcock and
Wilcox Cyclone Furnace Vitrification Technolo-
gy. Volume 2.
PB92-222223/CDH See 1338
EPA/910/9-89/031A
Commencement Bay Nearshore/Tideflats Fea-
sibility Study. Executive Summary.
PB93-181220/CDH See 1579
EPA/910/9-89/031B
Commencement Bay Nearshore/Tideflats Fea-
sibility Study. Volume 1.
PB93-181238/CDH See 1580
EPA/910/9-89/031C
Commencement Bay Nearshore/Tideflats Fea-
sibility Study. Volume 2. Appendices.
PB93-181246/CDH See 1581
EPA/910/9-89/032
Commencement Bay Nearshore/Tideflats Fea-
sibility Study. Development of Sediment Clean-
up Goals.
PB93-181253/CDH See 1578
EPA/9012.10-A
Revision of CERCLA Civil Judicial Settlement
Authorities under Delegations 14-13-B and 14-
14-E.
PB91-138818/CDH See 0602
EPA/9012.10-A-I
Waiver of Concurrence on De Minimis Genera-
tor Settlements.
PB91-138826/CDH See 0892
EPA/9012.10-B
Redelegation of Civil Judicial Settlement Au-
thorities under Delegation 14-13-B and 14-14-
E.
, PB91-138834/CDH See 0593
I
EPA/9200.1-12A
Superfund Progress - Aficionado's Version
(Progress as of March 31, 1992).
PB92-963267/CDH See 0326
EPA/9200.2-02
Accelerated Response at NPL Sites Guidance
(Superfund Management Review: Recommen-
dation No. 22).
PB90-258302/CDH See 0082
EPA/9200.5-004
OSWER Comparative Risk Project. Executive
Summary and Overview.
PB90-272501/CDH See 1062
EPA/9200.5-250/FS
Innovative Technology: Soil Washing.
PB90-274184/CDH See 1515
EPA/9200.5-251/FS
Innovative Technology: In-sltu Vitrification.
PB90-274192/CDH See 1514
EPA/9200.5-252/FS
Innovative Technology: Slurry-Phase Biodegra-
dation.
PB90-274200/CDH See 1271
EPA/9200.5-253/FS
Innovative Technology: BEST Solvent Extrac-
tion Process.
PB90-274218/CDH See 1270
EPA/9200.5-254/FS
Innovative Technology: Glycolate Dehalogena-
tion.
PB90-274226/CDH See 1513
EPA/9200.5-702
National Priorities List Sites: Alabama.
PB91-921209/CDH See 0148
EPA/9200.5-703
National Priorities List Sites: Alaska.
PB91-921210/CDH See 0151
EPA/9200.5-704
National Priorities List Sites: Arizona and
Nevada.
PB91 -921211 /CDH See 0156
EPA/9200.5-705
National Priorities List Sites: Arkansas.
PB91-921212/CDH See 0159
EPA/9200.5-706
National Priorities List Sites: California.
PB91-921213/CDH See 0162
EPA/9200.5-707
National Priorities List Sites: Colorado.
PB91-921214/CDH See 0165
EPA/9200.5-708
National Priorities List Sites: Connecticut.
PB91-921215/CDH See 0168
EPA/9200.5-709
National Priorities List Sites: Delaware.
PB91-921216/CDH See 0171
EPA/9200.5-710
National Priorities List Sites: Florida.
PB91 -921217/CDH See 0174
EPA/9200.5-711
National Priorities List Sites: Georgia.
PB91-921218/CDH See 0177
EPA/9200.5-712
National Priorities List Sites: Hawaii.
PB91 -921219/CDH See 0180
EPA/9200.5-713
-------
NUMBER INDEX
EPA/9240.0-03
EPA/9200.5-714
National Priorities List Sites: Illinois.
PB91-921221/CDH See 0184
EPA/9200.5-715
National Priorities List Sites: Indiana.
PB91-921222/CDH See 0187
EPA/9200.5-716
National Priorities List Sites: Iowa.
PB91-921223/CDH See 0190
EPA/9200.5-717
National Priorities List Sites: Kansas.
PB91-921224/CDH See 0193
EPA/9200.5-718
National Priorities List Sites: Kentucky.
PB91 -921225/CDH See 0196
EPA/9200.5-719
National Priorities List Sites: Louisiana.
PB91 -921226/CDH See 0199
EPA/9200.5-720
National Priorities List Sites: Maine.
PB91 -921227/GDH See 0202
EPA/9200.5-721
National Priorities List Sites: Maryland.
PB91 -921228/CDH See 0205
EPA/9200.5-722
National Priorities List Sites: Massachusetts.
PB91-921229/CDH See 0208
EPA/9200.5-723
National Priorities List Sites: Michigan.
PB91-921230/CDH See 0211
EPA/9200.5-724
National Priorities List Sites: Minnesota.
PB91-921231/CDH See 0214
EPA/9200.5-725
National Priorities List Sites: Mississippi.
PB91-921232/CDH See 0217
EPA/9200.5-726
National Priorities List Sites: Missouri.
PB91-921233/CDH See 0220
EPA/9200.5-727
National Priorities List Sites: Montana.
PB91-921234/CDH See 0223
EPA/9200.5-728
National Priorities List Sites: Nebraska.
PB91 -921236/CDH See 0226
EPA/9200.5-729
National Priorities List Sites: New Hampshire.
PB91-921237/CDH See 0229
EPA/9200.5-730
National Priorities List Sites: New Jersey.
PB91-921235/CDH See 0232
EPA/9200.5-731
National Priorities List Sites: New Mexico.
PB91-921238/CDH See 0235
EPA/9200.5-732
National Priorities List Sites: New York.
PB91-921239/CDH See 0238
EPA/9200.5-733
National Priorities List Sites: North Carolina.
PB91-921240/CDH See 0243
EPA/9200.5-734
National Priorities List Sites: North and South
Dakota.
PB91 -921241 /CDH See 0241
EPA/9200.5-735
National Priorities List Sites: Ohio.
PB91 -921242/CDH See 0247
EPA/9200.5-736
National Priorities List Sites: Oklahoma.
PB91-921243/CDH See 0250
EPA/9200.5-737
National Priorities List Sites: Oregon.
PB91 -921244/CDH See 0253
EPA/9200.5-738
National Priorities List Sites: Pennsylvania.
PB91-921245/CDH See 0256
EPA/9200.5-739
National Priorities List Sites: Rhode Island.
PB91 -921246/CDH See 0262
EPA/9200.5-740
National Priorities List Sites: South Carolina.
PB91 -921247/CDH See 0266
EPA/9200.5-741
National Priorities List Sites: Tennessee.
PB91-921248/CDH See 0269
EPA/9200.5-742
National Priorities List Sites: Texas.
PB91-921249/CDH See 0272
EPA/9200.5-743
National Priorities List Sites: Utah.
PB91-921250/CDH See 0276
EPA/9200.5-744
National Priorities List Sites: Vermont.
PB91 -921251 /CDH See 0279
EPA/9200.5-745
National Priorities List Sites: Virginia.
PB91-921252/CDH See 0282
EPA/9200.5-746
National Priorities List Sites: Washington.
PB91-921253/CDH See 0285
EPA/9200.5-747
National Priorities List Sites: West Virginia.
PB91-921254/CDH See 0288
EPA/9200.5-748
National Priorities List Sites: Wisconsin.
PB91-921255/CDH See 0291
EPA/9200.5-749
National Priorities List Sites: Wyoming.
PB91-921256/CDH See 0294
EPA/9200.5-750
National Priorities List Sites: American Samoa,
Guam and Trust Territories.
PB91-921258/CDH See 0155
EPA/9200.5-751
National Priorities List Sites: Puerto Rico.
PB91-921257/CDH See 0259
EPA/9221.0-02A
CERCLIS Data Handling Support Policy State-
ment.
PB90-258328/CDH See 0013
EPA/9230.0-06
Superfund Responsiveness Summaries (Super-
fund Management Review: Recommendation
Number 43E).
PB90-273731/CDH See 0125
EPA/9230.0-08
Planning for Sufficient Community Relations
(Superfund Management Review: No. 43A).
PB90-249533/CDH See 0108
EPA/9230.0-09
Community Relations: Use of Senior Environ-
mental Employees in Superfund (Superfund
Management Review: Recommendation
43.K.L).
PB90-273749/CDH See 0088
EPA/9230.0-15
Role of Community Interviews in the Develop-
ment of a Community Relations Program for
Remedial Response.
PB90-273756/CDH See 0485
EPA/9230.0-19
Proposed Method to Evaluate the Effective-
ness of Community Involvement in Superfund
(Superfund Management Review: Recommen-
dation Number 43.A).
PB90-273764/CDH See 0109
EPA/9230.1-05/FS
Superfund Technical Assistance Grants.
PB90-273772/CDH See 0502
EPA/9234.0-02
CERCLA Compliance with Other Environmen-
tal Statutes.
PB91-214098/CDH See 0404
EPA/9234.0-04
Consideration of RCRA Requirements in Per-
forming CERCLA Responses at Mining Waste
Sites.
PB91-214205/CDH See 0420
EPA/9234.1-01
CERCLA Compliance with Other Laws Manual.
Part 1. Interim Final.
PB90-272535/CDH See 0409
EPA/9234.2-01/FS
ARARs Q's and A's.
PB90-273780/CDH See 0398
EPA/9234.2-02/FS
CERCLA Compliance with Other Laws Manual:
Guide to Manual.
PB90-274242/CDH See 0407
EPA/9234.2-03/FS
CERCLA Compliance with Other Laws Manual:
Overview of ARARs - Focus on ARAR Waiv-
ers.
PB90-273798/CDH See 0408
EPA/9234.2-04/FS
CERCLA Compliance with Other Laws Manual:
RCRA ARARS-Focus on Closure Require-
ments.
PB90-274259/CDH See 0410
EPA/9234.2-05/FS
CERCLA Compliance with Other Laws Manual:
CERCLA Compliance with State Requirements.
PB90-272543/CDH See 0405
EPA/9234.2-06/FS
CERCLA Compliance with Other Laws Manual:
CERCLA Compliance with the CWA and
SDWA.
PB90-273806/CDH See 0406
EPA/9234.2-07/FS
CERCLA Compliance with Other Laws Manual:
Summary and Part 2. CAA, TSCA, and Other
Statutes.
PB90-272550/CDH See 0411
EPA/9234.2-08/FS
ARAR's Q's and A's. Compliance with the Tox-
icity Characteristics Rule. Part 1.
PB90-273814/CDH See 0396
EPA/9234.2-09/FS
ARARS Q's and A's: Compliance with Federal
Water Quality Criteria.
PB90-274267/CDH See 0399
EPA/9234.2-11/FS
ARARs Q's and A's: State Ground-Water Anti-
degradation Issues.
PB91-921311/CDH See 0402
EPA/9240.0-03
Superfund Analytical Review and Oversight.
PB90-249541/CDH See 0995
NU-19
-------
I! I!'!!!"1
'llli "SI*!'31 W! H '(ME I !» ',
1 it J:i<:i ; i;1 -
";s i is : • I Hi ..... :< "
1 ''liif iIJSf I'
: 'Si"' If
iliiilK! «!1
EPA/9240.0-04-1
NUMBER INDEX
EPA/9240.0-04-1
Guidelines (or Effective Management of the
Contract Laboratory Program.
PBBO-272568/CDH See 0027
EPA/9240,0-05
Dscentrallzatlon of Superfund Bottle Reposi-
tory Functions.
PggO-249559/Cbli,;; ....... ',,^ \ ' See 0985
EPA/9242.5-02
Model Performanca Standards for Superfund
Project Officers, Deputy Project Officers, and
Work Assignment Managers/Delivery Order
Officers.
PB90-258336/CDH See 0045
EPA/9242.6-07
Approval of Long Term Contracting Strategy
for Superfund (Superfund Management
Review: RocommendaOon E.2).
FlB8b-273822/CDH Seeoois
EPA/9242.6-07/FS
Long-Term Contracting Strategy for Superfund.
PS9P.274275/CDH., ..... „, • • ...... . - See 0042
Gufcte on Remedial Actions for Contaminated
Ground Water.
PB§r>272576/CDH See 1461
EPA/9285.0-01
OSWER Integrated Health and Safety Policy.
P880-25B344/CDH See 0920
EPA/9285.1-01C
Standard Operating Safety Guides.
, Pg90-24S590/CDHrr ..... „ ..... ............ See P924
EPA/9285.2-02 , ".^ ...... ' ..... ' ...... ...... '.
Field Standard Operating Procedures for the
Dggontaminatlori of Response Personnel
F.S.O,P, No. 7.
, F|g1 f 1 3850/CDy ..... , ............. ....... See 0913 ,
EPA7928&2-03
FtoW Standard Operating Procedures for Air
Surveiance F.S.O.P. No. 8.
P891-213843/COH See 0910
EPA79285.2-05
FWd Standard Operating Procedures for Prep-
aration of a Site Safety Plan F.S.O.P. No. 9.
Enyironm«ntal Asbestos .Assessment Manual,
Superfund Method for the Determination of As-
bestos in Ambient Air. Part 1. Method.
P|90-274283/CpH See 1027
EPA/9285.5-02-2 ......................................
Environmental A8bJst°s Assessment Manual.
Sgperfund Method for the Determination of As-
bisfos in Ambient AE Part 2. Technical Back-
ground Document.
PB80-274291/COH See 1028
EPA/9285.7-01/FS
Risk Assessment Guidance for Superfund.
VoKim« 1. Human Health Evaluation Manual.
PartA,Aprt1990.
P890-273830/CDH See 1066
EPA/9285.7-05/FS
G;ujdtno9 for .Data, ...... Useabfty in Risk Assess-
Pl|i-|2i3i2/CDH See 1030
EPA/9285,9-05
Mandatory Training Requirements for OCSs
and RPMs.
PB80-272S84/CDH See 0104
EPA/9285.9-06
Mandatory Community Relations Training. Su-
perfund Management Review Implementation
Product (Recommendation: No. 43.P(i)).
PB90-272592/CDH See 0103
EPA/9320.7-01/FS
Revised Hazard Ranking System: An Improved
Tool for Screening Superfund Sites.
PB91-921307/CDH See 0377
EPA/9320.7-02/FS
Revised Hazard Ranking System: Qs and As.
PB91-921305/CDH See 0381
EPA/9320.7-03/FS
Revised Hazard Ranking System: Background
Information.
PB91-921303/CDH See 0378
EPA/9320.7-04/FS
Closing the NPL Book under the Original HRS.
PB91-921302/CDH See 0337
EPA/9330.2-04
Discharge of Wastewater from CERCLA Sites
into PQTWS.
PB9b-249616/CbH See 0421
EPA/9330.2-06
CERCLA Off-Site Policy - Eligibility of Facilities
in Assessment Monitoring.
PB90-249632/CDH See 0414
EPA/9330.2-07
Notification of Out-of-State Shipments of Su-
perfund Site Wastes.
PB90-272618/CDH See 0429
EPA/9330.2-11
CERCLA Site Discharges to POTWS Treatabil-
ity Manual.
PB91-921269/CDH See 1577
EPA/9330.2-12
CERCLA Site Discharges to POTWS CERCLA
Site Sampling Program: Detailed Data Report.
PB91-921270/CDH See 1575
EPA/9335.3-02/FS-2
Guide to Developing Superfund Proposed
Plans.
PB90-273855/CDH See 1099
EPA/9347.0-01
Interim RCRA/CERCLA Guidance on Non-
Contiguous Sites and On-Site Management on
Waste and Treatment Residue.
PB90-274317/CDH See 0427
EPA/9347.1-02
Policy for Superfund Compliance with the
RCRA Land Disposal Restrictions.
PB90-249640/CDH See 0436
EPA/9347.3-01/FS
Superfund LDR Guide No. 1: Overview of
RCRA Land Disposal Restrictions (LDRs).
PB90-274325/CDH See 0440
EPA/9347.3-02/FS
Superfund LDR Guide No. 2: Complying with
the California List Restrictions under Land Dis-
posal Restrictions (LDRs).
PB90-274333/CDH See 0441
EPA/9347.3-03/FS
Superfund LDR Guide No. 3: Treatment Stand-
ards and Minimum Technology Requirements
under Land Disposal Restrictions (LDRS).
PB90-274341/CDH See 0442
EPA/9347.3-04/FS
Superfund LDR Guide No. 4: Complying with
the Hammer Restrictions under Land Disposal
Restrictions (LDRs).
PB90-274358/CDH See 0443
EPA/9347.3-05/FS
Superfund LDR Guide No. 5: Determining
When Land Disposal Restrictions (LDRs) Are
'Applicable' to CERCLA Response Actions.
PB90-274366/CDH See 0444
EPA/9347.3-06B/FS
Obtaining a Soil and Debris Treatability Vari-
ance for Removal Actions. Superfund LDR
Guide No. 6B.
PB91-921310/CDH See 0430
EPA/9347.3-08/FS
Compliance with Third Third Requirements
Under the LDRs. Superfund LDR Guide No. 8.
PB91-921313/CDH See 0418
EPA/9347.3-09/FS
Guide to Delisting of RCRA Wastes for Super-
fund Remedial Responses.
PB90-274374/CDH See 0422
EPA/9347.3-11/FS
CERCLA Compliance with the RCRA Toxicity
Characteristics (TC) Rule: Part 2.
PB91-921309/CDH See 0412
EPA/9355.0-20
RJ/FS Improvements.
PB90-272642/CDH See 1108
EPA/9355.0-25A
Use of Removal Approaches to Speed Up Re-
medial Action Projects.
PB90-274382/CDH See 1140
EPA/9355.0-26
Advancing the Use of Treatment Technologies
for Superfund Remedies.
PB90-272659/CDH See 1191
EPA/9355.0-27/FS
Guide to Selecting Superfund Remedial Ac-
tions.
PB90-273863/CDH See 1100
EPA/9355.0-28
Control of Air Emissions from Superfund Air
Strippers at Superfund Groundwater Sites.
PB90-272667/CDH See 1399
EPA/9355.3-01/FS
Remedial Investigation: Site Characterization
and Treatability Studies.
PB90-274408/CDH See 1106
EPA/9355.3-01/FS1
Getting Ready: Scoping the RI/FS.
PB90-274390/CDH See 1092
EPA/9355.3-01/FS-3
Feasibility Study: Development and Screening
of Remedial Action Alternatives.
PB90-274416/CDH See 1089
EPA/9355.3-01/FS-4
Feasibility Study: Detailed Analysis of Remedi-
al Action Alternatives.
PB90-272675/CDH See 1088
EPA/9355.3-05
RI/FS Improvements Follow-Up.
PB90-249657/CDH See 1109
EPA/9355.3-11/FS
Streamlining the RI/FS for CERCLA Municipal
Landfill Sites.
PB90-274424/CDH See 1118
Streamlining the RI/FS for CERCLA Municipal
Landfill Sites.
PB91 -921301 /CDH See 1119
EPA/9355.4-01/FS
Guide on Remedial Actions at Superfund Sites
with PCS Contamination.
PB90-274432/CDH See 1262
NU-20
-------
NUMBER INDEX
OERR-9360.8-02
EPA/9355.4-03-VOL-2
Evaluation of Ground-Water Extraction Reme-
dies. Volume 2. Case Studies 1-19.
PB90-274440/CDH See 1446
EPA/9355.4-03-VOL-3
Evaluation of Ground-Water Extraction Reme-
dies. Volume 3. General Site Data: Data Base
Reports.
PB90-274457/CDH See 1447
EPA/9355.5-01
Guidance on Oversight of PRP Performed RD/
RA.
PB90-249707/CDH See 1130
EPA/9355.5-01/FS
ARCS Construction Contract Modification Pro-
cedures.
PB90-274515/CDH See 0020
EPA/9355.5-02
Guidance on Expediting Remedial Design and
Remedial Action.
PB90-273871 /CDH See 1129
EPA/9355.5-02/FS
Expediting Remedial Construction.
PB90-272683/CDH See 1127
EPA/9355.5-05/FS
USAGE Preplaced and Rapid Response Con-
tracts.
PB90-273889/CDH See 1139
EPA/9355.5-14/FS
EPA/USACE Payment Process: Direct Cite/
Revised Reimbursement Methods.
PB90-273897/CDH See 1126
EPA/9360.0-02C
Removal Cost Management System: Version
3.2.
PB90-272691/CDH See 1009
EPA/9360.0-12A
Final Guidance on Implementation of the 'Con-
sistency' Exemption to the Statutory Limits on
Removal Actions.
PB90-274465/CDH See 1004
EPA/9360.0-12/FS
Exemptions from the Statutory Limits on Re-
moval Actions.
PB91-921304/CDH See 1002
EPA/9360.0-15
Role of Expedited Response Actions under
SARA.
PB91-214221/CDH See 1116
EPA/9360.0-21
Emergency Response Notification System.
PB90-249715/CDH See 0927
EPA/9360.3-01
Superfund Removal Procedures: Action Memo-
randum Guidance.
PB90-274473/CDH See 1012
EPA/9360.4-01
Quality Assurance/Quality Control Guidance
for Removal Activities: Sampling QA/QC Plan
and Data Validation Procedures.
PB90-274481/CDH See 0993
EPA/9360.5-00
Guidelines for the Cleanup of Clandestine Drug
Laboratories.
PB90-272709/CDH See 1007
EPA/9360.6-05
Superfund Emergency Response Actions: A
Summary of Federally Funded Removals.
Fourth Annual Report - Fiscal Year 1989.
PB91-921260/CDH See 0314
EPA/9360.7-06
Guidance for Federal Facilities on Release No-
tification Requirements under CERCLA and
SARA Title 111.
PB93-963412/CDH See 0898
EPA/9375.5-02A
Revised Interim Final Guidance on Indian In-
volvement in the Superfund Program.
PB90-249723/CDH See 0484
EPA/9375.5-04
Involvement of Superfund Program Managers
in Superfund Response Agreement Audits.
PB90-249731/CDH See 0099
EPA/9375.5-04/FS
Audits and the Superfund Program Manager.
PB90-272717/CDH See 0086
EPA/9375.5-08/FS
Criminal Investigations and the Superfund Pro-
gram.
PB90-274499/CDH See 0469
EPA/9375.5-09/FS
CERCLA Waste Capacity Assurance.
PB90-274507/CDH See 0131
EPA/9375.5-10/FS
Public Awareness Signs at Superfund Sites.
PB91-921306/CDH See 0481
EPA/9375.6-04
Status of State Involvement in the Superfund
Program, FY 80 to FY 89.
PB90-272725/CDH • See 0114
EPA/9375.6-08
Analysis of State Superfund Programs: 50-
State Study.
PB90-272733/CDH See 0447
EPA/9380.0-27
Guide for Conducting Treatability Studies
under CERCLA.
PB90-249772/CDH See 1154
EPA/9380.3-01
Treatability Studies Contractor Work Assign-
ments.
PB90-273962/CDH See 0076
EPA/9380.3-02/FS
Treatability Studies Under CERCLA: An Over-
view.
PB90-273970/CDH See 1172
EPA/9380.3-04
Analysis of Treatability Data for Soil and
Debris: Evaluation of Land Ban Impact on Use
of Superfund Treatment Technologies.
PB90-258476/CDH See 1488
EPA/9380.4-01
Use of Office of Research and Development's
Bioremediation Expertise in Superfund Remov-
al Program.
PB90-249798/CDH See 1016
EPA/9387.5-03/FS
Political Subdivision Involvement in Superfund.
PB90-273954/CDH See 0479
ER-8902
Achieving Greater Consistency between Sub-
jective and Objective Risks.
PB90-229832/CDH See 1017
ERLN-TT02
Framework for Real-Time Decision-Making:
New Bedford Harbor Pilot Dredging Study.
PB90-150822/CDH See 1587
ERLN-1033
Using the DNA Alkaline Unwinding Assay to
Detect DNA Damage in Laboratory and Envi-
ronmentally Exposed Cells and Tissues.
PB90-245770/CDH See 1368
ERLN-1090
Development and Use of Site-Specific Chemi-
cal and Biological Criteria for Assessing New
Bedford Harbor Pilot Dredging Project.
PB91-182329/CDH See 1583
ERLN-1173
Acid Volatile Sulfide Predicts the Acute Toxici-
ty of Cadmium and Nickel in Sediments.
PB93-222107/CDH See 1572
ERLN-1197
Application of 'Real-Time' Monitoring in Deci-
sion Making: The New Bedford Harbor Pilot
Dredging Project.
PB94-130747/CDH See 1574
ISBN-0-16-036223-7
Inside the Hotline: A Compilation of 1991
Monthly Hotline Reports.
PB92-131390/CDH See 0140
ISBN-0-16-036253-9
Literature Survey of Innovative Technologies
for Hazardous Waste Site Remediation, 1987-
1991.
PB93-105617/CDH See 1281
ISBN-0-309-040868
Tracking Toxic Substances at Industrial Facili-
ties: Engineering Mass Balance versus Materi-
als Accounting.
PB92-223213/CDH See 1362
MISC-91025
Characterizing soils for hazardous waste site
assessments.
DE91014097/CDH See 1495
MRI-3862-A
Identification of SARA (Superfund Amend-
ments and Reauthorization Act) Compounds in
Adipose Tissue.
PB90-132564/CDH See 1055
OERR-9200.6-02
Superfund Docket Operations Manual for Rule-
making Activities.
PB91 -921349/CDH See 0081
OERR-9240.0-04-1
Guidelines for Effective Management of the
Contract Laboratory Program. Part 1. Contract
Award. Part 2. Contract Administration.
PB90-191545/CDH See 0028
OERR-9240.0-04-2
Guidelines for Effective Management of the
Contract Laboratory Program. Part 1. Contract
Award. Part 2. Contract Administration.
PB90-191545/CDH See 0028
OERR-9246.0-05
Guidance on Site Assessment Cooperative
Agreements.
PB92-224385/CDH See 0475
OERR-9295.2-04
EPA/U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Payment
Process, Direct Cite/Revised Reimbursement
Methods.
PB91-921347/CDH See 1125
OERR-9355.0-32
Handbook: Responding to Discharges of Sink-
ing Hazardous Substances.
PB91-228346/CDH See 1589
OERR-9360.8-02
Oil Spill Prevention, Control, and Countermeas-
ures Program. Task Force Report.
PB91-213868/CDH See 0932
NU-21
-------
OERR-9360.8-03
NUMBER INDEX
IS! • i
OERR-9380.8JJ3 ...........................
Exxon Vaidaz'ON Spin. A Report to the Presi-
dent
P891-213819/CDH See 0928
OERR-9380.3-03
Inventory of freitablty Study Vendors.
\M»njei. .................
P891-228395/CDH See 1171
OHEA-C-073^ h™ II '.", ...... , "',„
r^tho^lojogy for Evaluating Potential Carcino-
genicKy in Support of Reportabla Quantity Ad-
justments Pursuant to OERCLA Section 102.
P893-230027/CDH See 1146
ORNL/M-781 .................................... .................... ,
Suporfund Remedial Action Decision Process:
Database (or Seiected FY87 Records of DeCl-
qe89010163/COH See 1136
ORNL-6479 [[[
Evaluation of Cleanup Levels for Remedial
Action at CERCLA (Comprehensive Environ-
mcnial Response, ..... Compensation and Liability
Act) Sites Based on a Review of EPA (Envi-
ronmental Protection ..... Agency) Records of De-
cfgfofi. ..... '
DE89007900/CpH .......................... See 1245
OSWi,R-D-9842.2
CERCLA Implementation of Inspector Training
Requirements for OSCs/RPMs at the Interme-
dltta Level (n STEP and First-Line Supervisors.
PMH87021/CDH See 0517
OSWER DIRECTIVE-9010.00
^sjuranc* ...... of Hazardous ..... Waste ..... Capacity,
Guidance to State Officials. Assistance in Ful-
filling the Requirements of CERCLA 104(c)(9).
PB91-214171/CDH See 0129
OSlER-DIREQTIVE-9010.02
Gut-ianca for Capacity Assurance Planning.
Cipaqity Planning Pursuant to CERCLA Sec-
tion 104(cM9).
PJ83-20S898/CDH .............. : ............. See 0137
Os5fER-blRlcTIVE-9-230.'H)3 ....................
Cttizens' Guidance Manual for the Technical
Asitotmooe Grant Program"! ....................
PB92-101435/CDH See 0463
Soporfund Technical Assistance Grant (TAG)
Handbook.
PB91-238592/CDH See 0499
OSW;ER, P|R;E;CTIV&9234.1-p2
ClRCLA ' (Comprehensive ....... Environmental Re-
sponsa, CompensaUgn and Liability Act) Com-
pline* Wttn" Other Laws Manual: Part 2. Clean
Air Act and Other Environmental Statutes and
Slata Requirements.
PB1KM48461/CDH See 0413
OSWER DIRECTIVE 9242.2-01B
Emwaency Response Cleanup Services Con-
tracts (ERGS). Users Manual.
PB90-191966/CDH See 0024
OSWER DIRECTIVE-9242.2-02
Slf-Spadffc Contracting for Removals.
PB91.215053/CDH See 1011
OSWER DlRECTlVE-9242.3-07
Implementation of the Decentralized Contrac-
tor Performance Evaluation and Award Fee
Process for Selected Remedial Program Con-
<**?!«•
Pl9i-gOS492/CDK ..... I"' '„!"' , ' See 0031
OSWJR P1RECTIVE-9242.6J)1
ARCS Work Assignment Management: Reid
"
See 0021
Fg91-2i49§5/COH t
OSWER DIRECTIVE-9242.6-02
Guidance for Organizing ARCS Contract Files.
PB91-215020/CDH See 0025
OSWER DIRECTIVE-9242.6-04
OERR Organizational Conflict of Interest
Review and Approval Program (Superfund
Management Review: Recommendation No.
46CJ.
PB91-214957/CDH See 0046
OSWER DIRECTIVE-9275.2-01
Superfund Remedial Program Financial Man-
agement Authority, Responsibilities and Proce-
dures.
PB91-214106/CDH See 1137
OSWER DIRECTIVE-9285.2-02
Field Standard Operating Procedures for the
Decontamination of Response Personnel
F.S.O.P. No. 7.
PB91-213850/CbH See 0913
OSWER DIRECTIVE-9285.2-03
Field Standard Operating Procedures for Air
Surveillance F.S.O.P. No. 8.
PB91-213843/CDH See 0910
OSWER DIRECTIVE-9285.2-04
Field Standard Operating Procedures for Es-
tablishing Work Zones (F.S.O.P. 6).
PB91-213827/CDH See 0911
OSWER DIRECTIVE-9285.2-05
Field Standard Operating Procedures for Prep-
aration of a Site Safety Plan F.S.O.P. No. 9.
PB91-213835/CDH See 0912
OSWER DIRECTIVE-9285.3-05
Hazmat Team Planning Guidance.
PB90-274523/CDH See 0915
OSWER DIRECTIVE-9285.4-02
Guidance for Coordinating ATSDR Health As-
sessment Activities with the Superfund Reme-
dial Process.
PB91-214080/CDH See 1029
OSWER D1RECTIVE-9330.2-05
CERCLA Off-Site Policy: Providing Notice to
Facilities.
PB90-249624/CDH See 0415
OSWER DIRECTIVE-9330.2-07FS
Summary of 'Notification of Out-of-State Ship-
ments of Superfund Site Wastes'.
PB91-228197/CDH See 0438
OSWER DIRECTIVE-9347.2-01
Land Disposal Restrictions as Relevant and
Appropriate Requirements for CERCLA Con-
taminated Soil and Debris.
PB91-214973/CDH See 0428
OSWER DIRECTIVE09355.3-06
RI/FS Streamlining.
PB91-214981/CDH See 1110
OSWER DIRECTIVE-9355.3-11
Conducting Remedial Investigations/Feasibility
Studies for CERCLA Municipal Landfill Sites.
PB91-921205/CDH See 1084
OSWER DIRECTIVE-9355.4-01
Guidance on Remedial Actions for Superfund
Sites with PCB Contamination.
PB91-921206/CDH See 1261
OSWER DlRECTIVE-9355.4-03
Considerations in Ground Water Remediation
at Superfund Sites.
PB91-238584/CDH See 1436
OSWER DIRECT(Vlf-936Q,p-08
CERCLA Removal Actions at Methane Re-
lease Sites.
PB91-190850/CDH See 0416
OSWER DIRECTIVE-9360.7-01
Reporting Requirements for Continuous Re-
leases of Hazardous Substances: A Guide for
Facilities and Vessels on Compliance.
PB91 -167593/CDH See 1150
OSWER DIRECTIVE-9360.7-03
Continuous Release-Emergency Response No-
tification System and Priority Assessment
Model: Model Documentation.
PB91-168468/CDH See 1143
OSWER DIRECTIVE-9360.7-04
Assessing Reports of Continuous Releases of
Hazardous Substances: A Guide for EPA Re-
gions.
PB91-921315/CDH See 1142
OSWER DIRECTIVE-9360.7-05
Continuous Release-Emergency Response No-
tification System and Priority Assessment
Model: User's Manual for EPA Regions.
PB91-168450/CDH See 1144
OSWER DIRECTIVE-9375.6-09
Enhancing State Superfund Capabilities: Nine-
State Study.
PB91-242362/CDH See 0471
OSWER DIRECTIVE-9380.3-10
Guide for Conducting Treatability Studies
under CERCLA.
PB93-126787/CDH See 1155
OSWER DIRECTIVE-9800.0
Superfund Enforcement Strategy and Imple-
mentation Plan.
PB91-138842/CDH See 0883
OSWER DIRECTIVE-9829.0
Policy for Enforcement Actions against Trans-
porters under CERCLA.
PB91 -138859/CDH See 0584
OSWER DIRECTIVE-9829.2
Entry and Continued Access under CERCLA.
PB91-138867/CDH See 0534
OSWER DIRECTIVE-9830.2
Regional Oversight of Federal Facility Clean-
ups under CERCLA.
PB91-138875/CDH See 0900
OSWER DIRECTIVE-9831.2
Reporting and Exchange of Information on
State Enforcement Actions at National Prior-
ities List Sites.
PB91-138883/CDH See 0483
OSWER DIRECTIVE-9831.4
Funding of State Enforcement Related Activi-
ties.
PB91 -138891 /CDH See 0474
OSWER DIRECTIVE-9831.5
Authority to Use CERCLA to Provide Enforce-
ment Funding Assistance to States.
PB91-138909/CDH See 0450
OSWER DIRECTIVE-9831.6A-6D
Interim Final Guidance Package on Funding
CERCLA State Enforcement Actions at NPL
Sites.
PB91-138917/CDH See 0477
OSWER DIRECTIVE-9831.7
Supporting State Attorneys General CERCLA
Remedial and Enforcement Activities at NPL
Sites.
PB91-138925/CDH See 0506
OSWER DIRECTIVE-9831.8
Counting State-Lead Enforcement NPL Sites
Toward the CERCLA Section 116(e) Remedial
Action Start Mandate.
PB91-138933/CDH See 0468
-------
NUMBER INDEX
OSWER DIRECTIVE-9835.2
OSWER DIRECTIVE-9831.9
Questions and Answers About the State Role
in Remedy Selection at Non-Fund-Financed
Enforcement Sites.
PB91-187039/CDH See 0482
OSWER DIRECTIVE-9832.0
Cost Recovery Referrals.
PB91 -138941 /CDH See 0525
OSWER DIRECTIVE-9832.0-1A
Procedures for Documenting Costs for
CERCLA Section 107 Actions.
PB91-138958/CDH See 0590
OSWER DIRECTIVE-9832.1
Cost Recovery Actions under CERGLA.
PB91 -138966/CDH See 0524
OSWER DIRECTIVE-9832.2
Coordination of EPA and State Actions in Cost
Recovery.
PB91-138974/CDH See 0522
OSWER DIRECTIVE-9832.3-1A
Cost Recovery Actions/Statute of Limitations.
PB91-138982/CDH See 0523
OSWER DIRECTIVE-9832.5
Policy on Recovering Indirect Cost in CERCLA
Section 107 Cost Recovery Actions.
PB91-138990/CDH See 0585
OSWER DIRECTIVE-9832.6
Small Cost Recovery Referrals.
PB91-139006/CDH See 0869
OSWER DIRECTIVE-9832.7
Guidance Regarding CERCLA Enforcement
against Bankrupt Parties.
PB91-139014/CDH See 0556
OSWER DIRECTIVE-9832.7-1A
Revised Hazardous Waste Bankruptcy Guid-
ance.
PB91-139022/CDH See 0598
OSWER DIRECTIVE-9832.8
Revised Hazardous Waste Bankruptcy Guid-
ance, October 7, 1991.
PB92-105485/CDH See 0599
OSWER DIRECTIVE-9832.10
Liability of Corporate Shareholders and Suc-
cessor Corporations for Abandoned Sites
Under the Comprehensive Environmental Re-
sponse, Compensation and Liability Act.
PB91-139030/CDH See 0570
OSWER DIRECTIVE-9832.11
Guidance on Documenting Decisions Not to
Take Cost Recovery Actions.
PB91-139048/CDH See 0549
OSWER DIRECTIVE-9832.12
Guidance on Federal Superfund Liens.
PB91-139055/CDH See 0551
OSWER DIRECTIVE-9832.13
Superfund Cost Recovery Strategy.
PB91-139063/CDH See 0882
OSWER DIRECTIVE-9832.17
Arbitration Procedures for Small Superfund
Cost Recovery Claims.
PB92-102045/CDH See 0512
OSWER DIRECTIVE-9832.18
Written Demand for CERCLA Cost Recovery.
PB91-204628/CDH See 0894
OSWER DIRECTIVE-9833.0-1A
Guidance on CERCLA 106(a) Unilateral Admin-
istrative Orders for Remedial Designs and Re-
medial Actions.
PB91-139089/CDH See 0548
OSWER DIRECTIVE-9833.0-1A-FS
Summary of 'Guidance on CERCLA Section
106(a) UAOs for RD/RA'.
PB91-228312/CDH See 0873
OSWER DIRECTIVE-9833.0-2B
Model Unilateral Order for Remedial Design
and Remedial Action.
PB91-139097/CDH See 0580
OSWER DIRECTIVE-9833.0-2C
Evaluation of, and Additional Guidance on, Is-
suance of Unilateral Administrative Orders
(UAOs) for RD/RA.
PB91 -201764/CDH See 0538
OSWER DIRECTIVE-9833.1
Issuance of Administrative Orders for Immedi-
ate Removal Actions.
PB91 -139105/CDH See 0567
OSWER DIRECTIVE-9833.2
Consent Orders and the Reimbursement Provi-
sion Under Section 106(b) of CERCLA.
PB91 -139113/CDH See 0520
OSWER DIRECTIVE-9833.3A-1
Final Guidance on Administrative Records for
Selecting CERCLA Response Actions.
PB91 -139121 /CDH See 0473
OSWER DIRECTIVE-9834.0
Releasing Identities of Potentially Responsible
Parties in Response to FOIA Requests.
PB91 -139147/CDH See 0594
OSWER DIRECTIVE-9834.2
Timely Initiation of Responsible Party
Searches, Issuance of Notice Letters, and Re-
lease of Information (Attachment XXII).
PB92-102060/CDH See 0886
OSWER DIRECTIVE-9834.3-2A
PRP Search Supplemental Guidance for Sites
in the Superfund Remedial Program.
PB91 -139162/CDH See 0592
OSWER DIRECTIVE-9834.3-2A-FS
Summary of 'PRP Search Supplemental Guid-
ance for Sites in the Superfund Remedial Pro-
gram'.
PB91-228320/CDH See 0879
OSWER DIRECTIVE-9834.4A
Transmittal of Guidance on Use and Enforce-
ment of CERCLA Information Requests and
Administrative Subpoenas.
PB91 -139170/CDH See 0887
OSWER DIRECTIVE-9834.5
Procedural Guidance on Treatment of Insurers
under CERCLA.
PB91 -139188/CDH See 0589
OSWER DIRECTIVE-9834.6
Policy Towards Owners of Residential Property
at Superfund Sites.
PB91-205476/CDH See 0586
OSWER DIRECTIVE-9834.7
Interim Guidance on Settlements with De Mini-
mis Waste Contributors under Section 122(g)
of SARA.
PB91-139196/CDH See 0562
OSWER DIRECTIVE-9834.7-1A
Interim Model CERCLA Section 122(g) (4) De
Minimis Waste Contributor Consent Decree
and Administrative Order on Consent.
PB91 -139204/CDH See 0565
OSWER DIRECTIVE-9834.7-1B
Methodologies for Implementation of CERCLA
Section 122(g) (1) (A) De Minimis Waste Con-
tributor Settlements Proposals and Agree-
ments.
PB91 -139212/CDH See 0572
OSWER DIRECTIVE-9834.7-1B-FS
Summary of 'Methodologies for Implementa-
tion of CERCLA Section 122(g)(1)(a) De Mini-
mis Waste Contributor Settlements'.
PB91-227959/CDH See 0878
OSWER DIRECTIVE-9834.8
Covenants Not to Sue under SARA.
PB91-139220/CDH See 0526
OSWER DIRECTIVE-9834.9
Evaluating Mixed Funding Settlements under
CERCLA.
PB91 -139238/CDH See 0537
OSWER DIRECTIVE-9834.9A
Interim Policy on Mixed Funding Settlements
Involving the Preauthorization of States or Po-
litical Subdivisions.
PB91-139246/CDH See 0566
OSWER DIRECTIVE-9834.10
Interim Guidance on Notice Letters, Negotia-
tions, and Information Exchange.
PB91-139253/CDH See 0560
OSWER DIRECTIVE-9834.10-1A
Waiver of Headquarters Approval for Issuance
of RD/RA Special Notice Letters at the Time
of ROD Signature from OERR and OWPE.
PB91 -139261 /CDH See 0893
OSWER DIRECTIVE-9834.10-1B
Model Notice Letters.
PB91 -139279/CDH See 0577
OSWER DIRECTIVE-9834.11
Revised Procedures for Implementing Off-Site
Response Actions.
PB91-139287/CDH See 0601
OSWER DIRECTIVE-9834.11 A
Off-Site Policy: RFA or Equivalent Investigation
Requirement at RCRA Treatment and Storage
Facilities.
PB91-139295/CDH See 0431
OSWER DIRECTIVE-9834.13
Municipal Settlements.
PB91 -139311 /CDH See 0583
OSWER DIRECTIVE-9834.13-FS
Summary of 'Interim Policy on CERCLA Settle-
ments Involving Municipalities and Municipal
Wastes'.
PB91-228262/CDH See 0877
OSWER DIRECTIVE-9834.14
Transmittal of Model Consent Decree for
CERCLA Section 104(e) Information Request
Enforcement Actions.
PB91 -193417/CDH See 0888
OSWER DIRECTIVE-9834.16
Model Informational Notice Letter to Local
Governments.
PB91 -187013/CDH See 0575
OSWER DIRECTIVE-9835.0
Interim CERCLA Settlement Policy.
PB91-139329/CDH See 0559
OSWER DIRECTIVE-9835.1A
Interim Guidance on Potentially Responsible
Party Participation in Remedial Investigations
and Feasibility Studies.
PB91-139337/CDH See 0561
OSWER DIRECTIVE-9835.2
Guidance on Drafting Consent Decrees in Haz-
ardous Waste Cases.
PB91-139345/CDH See 0550
NU-23
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE-9835.2A
OSWER DIRECT IVE-9835.2A
Rljfjslons to,th8jntg£jm, Guidance on PRP Par-
" Bepatlpn In Remedial Investigations and Feasi-
bility Studies.
PBSl-139352/CDH See 0603
Guidance of the Use of Stipulated Penalties in
Hazardous Waste Consent Decrees.
PBS1-139360/COH See 0544
OSWER plRECT)VE-9i3S.3:1A ........ „
,A|iynj§tfatiy« Order, on Consent for Remedial
Investigations/Feasibility Study.
PB9M39378/CDH Se e 0510
OSWER DIRECT1VE-9835.3-2A
Suppterrtental Guidance on Performing Risk
A«$owinwnts in Remedial Investigation/Feasi-
bSty Studies (RI/FSs). Conducted by Potential-
ly Responsibla Parties (PRPs).
PB91-20S526/CDH See 1078
OSWER DIRECT1VE-9835.4
Interim Guidance: Streamlining the CERCLA
Settlement Decision Process.
PB91-139386/CDH See 0563
OSWER DIRECTIVE-9835.4-2A
Initiation of PRP-Flnanced Remedial Design in
Advance of Consent Decree Entry (Rnal).
PgJJ.}3Jf384fCOfl ...................... ..... See 055,7
OSWER DIRECTIVE-9835.5
EPA Iritorim Guidance on Indemnification of
Suportund Response Action Contractors Under
Section 119 of SARA.
PB91-139402/CDH See 0536
OSWER DIRECTIVE-9835.6
on Premium Payments in CERCLA
Statements.
, „ , ..... „ ..... u , ...... See 0553
OSWER DIRECTIVE-9835.7
Gukiano* on CERCLA Secflon 1 06 Judicial Ac-
tions.
PB91-139428/CDH See 0546
OSWER pIRECTlVE-f 835.8
MoArf Statement of Work for a Remedial In-
vestigation and Feasibility Study Conducted by
Potentially Responsible Parties.
PS9I-139436/CDH See 0578
OSWER D1RECTIVE-9835.9FS
Summary of 'Guidance of Landowner Liability
undtr Section 107(a}1 of CERCLA, De Minimjs
Selemflnts wider Section 122(g)(1)(b) of
CEHCLA, and Settlements with Prospective
Purchasers of Contaminated. Property'.
PB81.228288/COH See 0872
MooX itigation Report for CERCLA Sections
106 and 107 and RCRA Section 7003.
re91-138451/CDH See 0576
OSWER DIRECtlVE-9i35.i2
Rfiftaslng Information to Potentially Responsi-
W» Parties at CERCLA Sitei"
P8$i-139469/CDH See 0595
OSWER DIRECTIVE-9835.12FS
Summary of 'Releasing Information to Poten-
Mjiy Responsible Parties at CERCLA Sites'.
. .
OSWER DIRECTIVE-9835.13
Comparative Analysts of Remedies Selected in
the Superfund Program during FY 87, FY 88
and FX 89.
NUMBER INDEX
OSWER DIRECTIVE-9835.14
Submitted of Ten-Point Settlement Analyses for
CERCLA Consent Decrees.
PB91-139485/CDH See 0871
OSWER D1RECTIVE-9835.15
Performance of Risk Assessments in Remedial
Investigation/Feasibility Studies (RI/FSs) Con-
ducted by Potentially Responsible Parties
(PRPs).
PB91-139493/CDH See 1102
OSWER DIRECTIVE-9835.15A
Supplemental Guidance on Performing Risk
Assessments in Remedial Investigation/Feasi-
bility Studies (RI/FSs). Conducted by Potential-
ly Responsible Parties (PRPs).
PB91-205526/CDH See 1078
OSWER DIRECTIVE-9835.17
United States Environmental Protection
Agency Model CERCLA RD/RA Consent
Decree.
PB91-201673/CDH See 0890
OSWER DIRECTIVE-9836.0-1A
Community Relations during Enforcement Ac-
tivities and Development of the Administrative
Record.
PB91 -139519/CDH See 0465
Community Relations during Enforcement Ac-
• tivities and Development of the Administrative
Record.
PB92-105469/CDH See 0466
OSWER DIRECTIVE-9836.2
CERCLA Community Relations Mailing Lists.
PB91-139527/CDH See 0451
OSWER DIRECTIVE-9837.1
Preparation of Hazardous Waste Referrals.
PB91-139543/CDH See 0588
OSWER-DIRECTIVE-9837.2
Enforcement Project Management Handbook.
PB90-780115/CDH See 0531
OSWER-DIRECTIVE-9837.2-A
Enforcement Project Management Handbook.
PB91-186999/CDH See 0532
OSWER DIRECTIVE-9838.1
Scope of the CERCLA Petroleum Exclusion
under Sections 101(14) and 104(a)(2).
PB91-139550/CDH See 0605
OSWER D1RECTIVE-9839.1
Interim Guidelines for Preparing Nonbinding
Preliminary Allocations of Responsibility.
PB92-102078/CDH See 0564
OSWER DIRECTIVE-9840.3
Site Classification Changes from Enforcement
to Fund Lead.
PB9i-13960"b/CDH See 0606
OSWER DIRECTIVE-9841.1A
Administrative Penalty Procedures.
PB92-101963/CDH See 0511
OSWER DIRECTIVE-9842.0
Guidance on Applicability of EPA Order 3500.1
to CERCLA Staff.
PB91-139642/CDH See 0545
OSWER DIRECTIVE-9842.1
CERCLA Implementation of the Training Re-
quirements of EPA Order 3500.1. Inspector
Training.
PB91-139659/CDH See 0518
OSWER DIRECTIVE-9843.0
Revised EPA Guidance on Parallel Proceed-
Coniiuttatior on Records of Decision (RODS)
lot Containment-Only Remedies.
PB91-228734/CDH See 0521
PB91-139667/CDH See 0597
OSWER DIRECT!VE-9850.0-1
Endangerment Assessment Guidance.
PB91-139675/CDH See 0527
OSWER DIRECTIVE-9850.1
Endangerment Assessment Handbook.
PB91-139683/CDH See 0529
OSWER DIRECTIVE-9850.4
Interim Guidance for Soil Ingestion Rates.
PB91-139709/CDH See 1057
OSWER DIRECTIVE-9851.3
Integrated Timeline for Superfund Site Man-
agement (SMR 5,15).
PB91-139717/CDH See 0098
OSWER DIRECTIVE-9870.1A
Use of CERCLA Section 106 Unilateral En-
forcement for Remedial Design and Remedial
Action: Strategy for Fiscal Year 1990.
PB91-139733/CDH See 0891
OSWER DIRECTIVE-9871.0
Roles and Responsibilities of Deputy Project
Officers and Work Assignment Managers
under the Technical Enforcement Support
(TES) Contracts.
PB91 -139741 /CDH See 0069
OSWER DIRECTIVE-9871.0-1A
Roles and Responsibilities of Regional Project
Officers and Headquarters Zone Project Offi-
cers for Management of TES (TES 5) Con-
tracts.
PB91-139758/CDH See 0604
OSWER DIRECTIVE-9891.1
Expanded Civil Judicial Referral Procedures.
PB91-139766/CDH See 0539
OSWER DIRECTIVE-9891.1-1A
Procedures for Transmittal of CERCLA and
RCRA Civil Judicial Enforcement Case Pack-
ages to Headquarters.
PB91 -139774/CDH See 0591
OSWER DIRIECTIVE-9891.3
Final EPA Policy on the Inclusion of Environ-
mental Auditing Provisions in Enforcement Set-
tlements.
PB92-102094/CDH See 0541
OSWER DIRECTIVE-9891.5A
Expansion of Direct Referral of Cases to the
Department of Justice.
PB91-139790/CDH See 0540
OSWER DIRECTIVE-9891.6
Multi-Media Settlements of Enforcement
Claims.
PB91-139808/CDH See 0581
Multi-Media Settlements of Enforcement
Claims.
PB92-102136/CDH See 0582
OSWER DIRECT!VE-9932.1
Guidance for Environmental Priorities Initiative
(EPI) Facilities in the Superfund Pre-Remedial
Program.
PB91 -139980/CDH See 0341
OSWER DIRECTIVE-9940.1
Issuance of Administrative Orders Under Sec-
tion 3013 of the Resource Conservation and
Recovery Act.
PB91-140111/CDH See 0568
OSWER DIRECT!VE-9940.2
Issuance of Final Revised Guidance on the
Use and Issuance of Administrative Orders
Under Section 7003 of the Resource Conser-
vation and Recovery Act (RCRA).
PB91 -140129/CDH See 0569
OSWER DIRECTIVE-9951.1
Transmittal of the Final Waste Oil Interim En-
forcement Guidance Document.
PB91-140202/CDH See 0889
™i!
-------
NUMBER INDEX
OSWER-9200.5-715A
OSWER-9200.0-14-1
Superfund Administrative Improvements. Exec-
utive Summary.
PB93-963294/CDH See 0310
OSWER-9200.0-15FS
Superfund Administrative Improvements: Rein-
venting Superfund.
PB94-963210/CDH See 0312
OSWER-9200.1-09I-VOL-1-NO-1
Superfund Policy Forum Update, Volume 1,
Number 1, February 1992.
PB92-963262/CDH See 0324
OSWER-9200.1-11
Accessing the $50 Million Set-Aside in the Re-
medial Action Budget for Quick Response at
National Priorities List Sites.
PB92-963342/CDH See 1082
OSWER-9200.1-12
Superfund Progress, Spring 1992.
PB92-963265/CDH See 0329
OSWER-9200.1-12-2
Superfund Progress, Summer 1992.
PB92-963279/CDH See 0330
OSWER-9200.1-12-3
Superfund Progress: Fall/Winter 1992.
PB93-963254/CDH See 0328
OSWER-9200.1-12B
Superfund Progress - Aficionado's Version:
Progress as of June 30,1992.
PB92-963278/CDH See 0325
OSWER-9200.1-12C
Superfund Progress. Aficionado's Version.
Progress as of September 30,1992.
PB93-963255/CDH See 0327
OSWER-9200.1-14
Superfund Reauthorization: NACEPT Subcom-
mittee Handbook.
PB93-963298/CDH See 0331
OSWER-9200.2-13
. Progress Toward Implementing Superfund,
Fiscal Year 1990: A Report to the Congress.
PB92-963256/CDH See 0301
OSWER-9200.2-14
National Oil and Hazardous Substances Pollu-
tion Contingency Plan (The NCP).
PB92-963261 /CDH See 0146
OSWER-9200.2-15FS
Overview of the Outyear Liability Model (OLM).
PB93-963259/CDH See 0106
OSWER-9200.2-16FS
Quality Assurance for Superfund Environmen-
tal Data Collection Activities.
PB93-963273/CDH See 0991
OSWER-9200.2-17
Progress Toward Implementing Superfund,
Fiscal Year 1991. Report to Congress.
PB94-963234/CDH See 0302
OSWER-9200.2-19A
Superfund Strategic Plan and Implementation
Strategy Fiscal Year 1994.
PB94-963245/CDH See 0126
OSWER-9200.2-19B
Superfund Strategic Plan and Implementation
Strategy Fiscal Year 1994: Office and Division
Plans.
PB94-963246/CDH See 0127
OSWER-9200.2-20FS
Overview of the Outyear Liability Model (OLM).
PB94-963215/CDH See 0107
OSWER-9200.3-01H-3
Highlights: Superfund Program Management.
Fiscal Year 1993.
PB93-963261/CDH See 0095
OSWER-9200.3-11
Final Policy on Setting RI/FS Priorities.
PB91-921324/CDH See 1090
OSWER-9200.3-14-1
Superfund Program Implementation Manual,
Fiscal Year 1994. Volume 1. Program Goals
and Planning Requirements. Volume 2. Pro-
gram Implementation Procedures.
PB94-963220/CDH See 0124
OSWER-9200.3-14-2
Superfund Program Management Manual,
Fiscal Year 1994.
PB94-963247/CDH See 0073
OSWER-9200.3-15I-VOL-1-NO-1
Superfund Program and Information Manage-
ment Update. Volume 1, Number 1, November
1993.
PB94-963208/CDH See 0123
OSWER-9200.5-01B
Superfund Program: Ten Years of Progress.
PB91-921286/CDH See 0977
OSWER-9200.5-105
Understanding Oil Spills and Oil Spill Re-
sponse.
PB93-963409/CDH See 0978
OSWER-9200.5-1151
OPA Update: Implementation of the Oil Pollu-
tion Act of 1990. Volume 2, Number 1.
PB92-963420/CDH See 0934
OSWER-9200.5-115I-VOL-1-NO-1
Update on Implementation of the Oil Pollution
Act of 1990. Volume 1, Number 1, February
1991.
PB91 -921370/CDH See 0936
OSWER-9200.5-115I-VOL-1-NO-2
Update on Implementation of the Oil Pollution
Act of 1990. Volume 1, Number 2, April 1991.
PB91-921371/CDH See 0937
OSWER-9200.5-115I-VOL-1-NO-3
Update on Implementation of the Oil Pollution
Act of 1990. Volume 1, Number 3, June 1991.
PB91-921372/CDH See 0938
OSWER-9200.5-208FS-A
Debarment and Suspension.
PB92-963331/CDH See 0470
OSWER-9200.5-402A
Contracting and Subcontracting Guide to the
Superfund Program.
PB92-963274/CDH See 0023
OSWER-9200.5-701A
Superfund: Focusing on the Nation at Large.
1991 Update.
PB92-963252/CDH See 0323
OSWER-9200.5-702A
National Priorities List Sites: Alabama.
PB92-963223/CDH See 0149
OSWER-9200.5-702B
National Priorities List Sites: Alabama, 1992.
PB93-963201 See 0150
OSWER-9200.5-703A
National Priorities List Sites: Alaska.
PB92-963251/CDH See 0152
OSWER-9200.5-703B
National Priorities List Sites: Alaska, 1992.
PB93-963202/CDH See 0153
OSWER-9200.5-704A
National Priorities List Sites: Arizona and
Nevada.
PB92-963216/CDH See 0157
OSWER-9200.5-704B
National Priorities List Sites: Arizona and
Nevada, 1992.
PB93-963204/CDH See 0158
OSWER-9200.5-705A
National Priorities List Sites: Arkansas.
PB92-963220/CDH See 0160
OSWER-9200.5-705B
National Priorities List Sites: Arkansas, 1992.
PB93-963205/CDH See 0161
OSWER-9200.5-706A
National Priorities List Sites: California and
Hawaii.
PB92-963239/CDH See 0163
OSWER-9200.5-706B
National Priorities List Sites: California and
Hawaii, 1992.
PB93-963206/CDH See 0164
OSWER-9200.5-707A
National Priorities List Sites: Colorado.
PB92-963237/CDH See 0166
OSWER-9200.5-707B
National Priorities List Sites: Colorado, 1992.
PB93-963207/CDH See 0167
OSWER-9200.5-708A
National Priorities List Sites: Connecticut.
PB92-963203 See 0169
OSWER-9200.5-708B
National Priorities List Sites: Connecticut,
1992.
PB93-963208/CDH See 0170
OSWER-9200.5-709A
National Priorities List Sites: Delaware.
PB92-963228/CDH See 0172
OSWER-9200.5-709B
National Priorities List Sites: Delaware, 1992.
PB93-963209/CDH See 0173
OSWER-9200.5-710A
National Priorities List Sites: Florida.
PB92-963250/CDH See 0175
OSWER-9200.5-710B
National Priorities List Sites: Florida, 1992.
PB93-963210/CDH See 0176
OSWER-9200.5-711A
National Priorities List Sites: Georgia.
PB92-963226/CDH See 0178
OSWER-9200.5-711B
National Priorities List Sites: Georgia, 1992.
PB93-963211 /CDH See 0179
OSWER-9200.5-713A
National Priorities List Sites: Idaho.
PB92-963219/CDH See 0182
OSWER-9200.5-713B
National Priorities List Sites: Idaho, 1992.
PB93-963212/CDH See 0183
OSWER-9200.5-714A
National Priorities List Sites: Illinois.
PB92-963248/CDH See 0185
OSWER-9200.5-714B
National Priorities List Sites: Illinois, 1992.
PB93-963213/CDH See 0186
OSWER-9200.5-715A
National Priorities List Sites: Indiana.
PB92-963249/CDH See 0188
NU-25
-------
OSWER-9200.5-715B
NUMBER INDEX
Hf
!' I'!;
OSWER-9200.5-715B
National Priorities Ust Sites: Indiana, 1992.
PB93-963214/CDH See 0189
OSWER-9200.5-716A
Nationai Priorities List Sites: Iowa.
p§82:963234/CDH See 0191
OSWER-9200.5-716B
liiatiftrjal Priorities Ust Sites: Iowa, 1992.
P893-963215/CDH See 0192
OSWER-9200.5-717A
National Priorities Ust Sites: Kansas.
PS92.963213/CDH See 0194
OS.WER-9200.5-717B
National Priorities Ust Sites: Kansas, 1992.
PB93.963216/CDH See 0195
OSWER-9200.5-718A
National Priorities Ust Sites: Kentucky!
PJ92-963227/CDH See 0197
OSWER-9200.5-718B
National Priorities Ust Sites: Kentucky, 19921
PB93-963217/CDH See 0198
OSWER.9200.5-719A
National Priorities Ust Sites: Louisiana.
Pja2-963222/OOH See 0200
.....
National Priorities List Sites: Louisiana, 1992.
P,B93-963218/Cp|j .................. n| , 366020,1
..........
' National Priorities Ust Sites: Maine.
PB92-963204/CDH See 0203
OSWER-9200.S-720B
Nationai Priorities List Sites: Maine, 19921
PB93-963219/CDH See 0204
OSWER-9200.5-721A
National Priorities Ust Sites: Maryland.
PJ92-963218/CDIJ ........ i ...... See 0206
OSWER-9200.5-721B
National Priorities List Sites: Maryland, 1992.
P893-963220/CDH See 0207
OSWER-9200.5-722A
National Priorities Ust Sites; Massachusetts.
PB92-963206/CDH See 0209
OSWER-9200.5-722B
I M,, | LI II I III II II I ' i ....... . • ' ', i 'i
Nat|ona( Priorities Ust Sites: Massachusetts,
1992.
. ,
OSWER-9200.5-723A
National Priorities Ust Sites: Michigan.
PB92-963247/CDH See 0212
OSWER-9200.5-723B
NatkmaJ Priorities Ust Sites: Michigan, 1992.
P893-963222/CDH See 0213
OSWER.9200.5-724A
Nationai Priorities Ust Sites: Minnesota.
PB92-96321 1 /COM See 0215
OSWER-9200.5-724B
National Priorities Ust Sites: Minnesota, 1992.
PB03-963223/ODH See 0216
OSWER-9200.5-725A ..........................
National Priories" ..... Si Sites: Mississippi.
RB82-9e3224/COH See 0218
O8\fVER-9200,5-725B
National Priorilies Ust Sites: Mississippi, 1992.
PB93-963224/CDH See 02J9
OSWfER-9200,5-726A
National Priorities List Sites: Missouri.
PB92-963214/CDH See 0221
OSWER-9200.5-726B
Nationai Prforitios Ust Sites: Missouri, 199a
P893-963225/CDH See 0222
NU-26
OSWER-9200.5-727A
National Priorities Ust Sites: Montana.
PB92-963235/CDH See 0224
OSWER-9200.5-727B
National Priorities List Sites: Montana, 1992.
PB93-963226/CDH See 0225
OSWER-9200.5-728A
National Priorities List Sites: Nebraska.
PB92-963233/CDH See 0227
OSWER-9200.5-728B
National Priorities List Sites: Nebraska, 1992.
PB93-963227/CDH See 0228
OSWER-9200.5-729A
National Priorities Ust Sites: New Hampshire.
PB92-963205/CDH See 0230
OSWER-9200.5-729B
National Priorities List Sites: New Hampshire,
1111 1992.
PB93-963228/CDH See 0231
OSWER-9200.5-730A
National Priorities Ust Sites: New Jersey.
PB92-963241/CDH See 0233
OSWER-9200.5-730B
National Priorities List Sites: New Jersey, 1992.
PB93-9632297cbH See 0234
OSVVER:92qp=?5-73s1A
National Priorities List Sites: New Mexico.
PB92-963232/CDH See 0236
OSWER-9200.5-731B
National Priorities List Sites: New Mexico,
1992.
PB93-96323Q/CPH See 0237
PSWER-92PQ.5-732A
National Priorities List Sites: New York.
, PB92-9632Q8/CDH See 0239
OSWER-9200.5-732B
Nationai Priorities List Sites: New York, 1992.
PB93-963231/CDH See 0240
OSWER-9200.5-733A
National Priorities List Sites: North Carolina.
PB92-963209/CDH See 0244
OSWER-9200.5-733B
National Priorities List Sites: North Carolina,
1992.
PB93-963232/CDH See 0245
OSWER-9200.5-734A
National Priorities List Sites: North Dakota and
South Dakota.
PB92-963236/CDH See 0246
OSWER-9200.5-734B
National Priorities List Sites: North and South
Dakota, 1992.
PB93-963233/CDH See 0242
OSWER-9200.5-735A
National Priorities List Sites: Ohio.
PB92-963246/CDH See 0248
OSWER-9200.5-735B
National Priorities List Sites: Ohio, 1992.
PB93-963234/CDH See 0249
OSWER-9200.5-736A
National Priorities List Sites: Oklahoma.
PB92-963221/CDH See 0251
pSWER-92p0.5:736B
'National Priorities List Sites: Oklahoma, 1992.
PB93-963235/CbH See 0252
pSWER-920p.5-737A
National Priorities List Sites: Oregon.
PB92-963245/CDH See 0254
OSWER-9200.5-737B
National Priorities List Sites: Oregon, 1992.
PB93-963236/CDH See 0255
OSWER-9200.5-738A
National Priorities Ust Sites: Pennsylvania.
PB92-963240/CDH See 0257
OSWER-9200.5-738B
National Priorities List Sites: Pennsylvania,
1992.
PB93-963237/CDH See 0258
OSWER-9200.5-739A
National Priorities List Sites: Rhode Island.
PB92-963230/CDH See 0263
OSWER-9200.5-739B
National Priorities List Sites: Rhode Island,
1992.
PB93-963239/CDH See 0264
OSWER-9200.5-740A
National Priorities List Sites: South Carolina.
PB92-963210/CDH See 0267
OSWER-9200.5-740B
National Priorities Ust Sites: South Carolina,
1992.
PB93-963240/CDH See 0268
OSWER-9200.5-741A
National Priorities List Sites: Tennessee.
PB92-963225/CDH See 0270
OSWER-9200.5-741B
National Priorities List Sites: Tennessee, 1992.
PB93-963241/CDH See 0271
OSWER-9200.5-742A
Natjonal Priorities Ust Sites: Texas.
PB92-963212/CbH S'ee"0273
OSWER-9200.5-742B
National Priorities Ust Sites: Texas, 1992.
PB93-963242/CDH See 0274
OSWER-9200.5-743A
National Priorities List Sites: Utah.
PB92-963215/CDH See 0277
OSWER-9200.5-743B
National Priorities List Sites: Utah, 1992.
PB93-963243/CDH See 0278
OSWER-9200.5-744A
National Priorities List Sites: Vermont.
PB92-963231/CDH See 0280
OSWER-9200.5-744B
National Priorities List Sites: Vermont, 1992.
PB93-963244/CDH See 0281
OSWER-9200.5-745A
National Priorities List Sites: Virginia.
PB92-963217/CDH See 0283
OSWER-9200.5-745B
National Priorities List Sites: Virginia, 1992.
PB93-963245/CDH See 0284
OSWER-9200.5-746A
National Priorities List Sites: Washington.
PB92-963244/CDH See 0286
OSWER-9200.5-746B
National Priorities List Sites: Washington,
1992.
PB93-963246/CDH See 0287
OSWER-9200.5-747A
National Priorities List Sites: West Virginia.
PB92-963229/CDH ^ See 0289
OSWER-9200.5-747B
,, National Priorities List Sites: West Virginia,
1992.
PB93-963247/CDH See 0290
-------
NUMBER INDEX
OSWER-9230.0-03C
OSWER-9200.5-748A
National Priorities List Sites: Wisconsin.
PB92-963243/CDH See 0292
OSWER-9200.5-748B
National Priorities List Sites: Wisconsin, 1992.
PB93-963248/CDH See 0293
OSWER-9200.5-749A
National Priorities List Sites: Wyoming.
PB92-963238/CDH See 0295
OSWER-9200.5-749B
National Priorities List Sites: Wyoming, 1992.
PB93-963249/CDH See 0296
OSWER-9200.5-750A
National Priorities List Sites: American Samoa,
Guam, and the Trust Territories.
PB92-963242/CDH See 0154
OSWER-9200.5-750B
National Priorities List Sites: The United States
Territories, 1992.
PB93-963203/CDH See 0275
OSWER-9200.5-751A
National Priorities List Sites: Puerto Rico.
PB92-963207/CDH See 0260
OSWER-9200.5-751B
National Priorities List Sites: Puerto Rico and
Virgin Islands, 1992.
PB93-963238/CDH See 0261
OSWER-9200.8-05
Audit Management Process. Reference Guide.
PB94-963232/CDH See 0085
OSWER-9200.8-05-1
SRIS System Overview and User's Guide.
PB94-963233/CDH See 0112
OSWER-9200.9-02
Procedures to Ensure that CLP Laboratories
Are Not Paid for Non-Compliant or Unuseable
Data.
PB94-963214/CDH See 0062
OSWER-9201.0-01
Implementation of the Superfund Alternative
Remedial Contracting Strategy (ARCS): Report
of the Administrator's Task Force. Implementa-
tion Plan.
PB92-963201/CDH See 0032
OSWER-9201.0-02
National Superfund Program Priorities, Fiscal
Year 1994.
PB94-963221/CDH See 0298
OSWER-9202.1-01
Regional Pilot Projects and Initiatives.
PB92-963259/CDH See 0064
OSWER-9202.1-02I-VOL-1-NO-1
Smart Moves in Superfund - Regional Initia-
tives. Volume 1, Number 1, February 1992.
PB92-963272/CDH See 0305
OSWER-9202.1-02I-VOL-1-NO-2
Smart Moves in Superfund - Regional Pilots
and Initiatives. Volume 1, Number 2, Septem-
ber 1992.
PB93-963283/CDH See 0306
OSWER-9202.1-02I-VOL-1-NO-3
Smart Moves in Superfund - Revitalization One
Year Later. Volume 1, Number 3, January
1993.
PB93-963284/CDH See 0307
OSWER-9202.1-02I-VOL-2-NO-1
Response Action Contractor Final Indemnifica-
tion Guidelines. Volume 2, Number 1, March
1993.
PB93-963290/CDH See 0067
OSWER-9202.1-03FS
Regional Pilots and Applications of Superfund
Accelerated Cleanup Model (SACM).
PB92-963273/CDH See 0110
OSWER-9202.1-04
Identification of a Senior Superfund Official for
Addressing Special NPL Site-Related Issues.
PB93-963279/CDH See 0348
OSWER-9202.1-05
Required Contracts Management Training for
Regional Superfund Personnel.
PB93-963258/CDH See 0065
OSWER-9202.1-06
Initiatives to Streamline the Alternative Reme-
dial Contracting Strategy (ARCS) Contracts'
Award Fee Process.
PB93-963275/CDH See 0033
OSWER-9202.1-07
Superfund: Report of the EPA Superfund Revi-
talization Public Meeting Held on June 24,
1992. Volumes 1 and 2.
PB92-963288/CDH See 0333
OSWER-9202.1-09
Guidance on Program Management Activities
under ARCS.
PB93-963280/CDH See 0026
OSWER-9202.1-10-1
Compendium of Good Ideas: Models of Suc-
cess and Lessons Learned. Volume 1. High-
lights.
PB93-963271/CDH See 0133
OSWER-9202.1-10-2
Compendium of Good Ideas: Models of Suc-
cess and Lessons Learned. Volume 2. Source
Book.
PB93-963272/CDH See 0134
OSWER-9202.1-11
Superfund: EPA/ICMA Superfund Revitaliza-
tion Conference. Held in Chicago, Illinois on
November 12-13, 1992.
PB93-963274/CDH See 0319
OSWER-9202.1-15A
Status of Regional Superfund Pilots: End-of-
Year Report.
PB94-963216/CDH See 0309
OSWER-9202.1-16
Superfund: EPA/ICMA Superfund Revitaliza-
tion Conference. Held in San Francisco, Cali-
fornia on February 1-2,1993.
PB94-963202/CDH See 0320
OSWER-9202.1-19
Superfund Revitalization: Measures of Suc-
cess.
PB94-963217/CDH See 0334
OSWER-9203.1-01
Superfund Accelerated Cleanup Model
(SACM).
PB92-963263/CDH See 0119
OSWER-9203.1-02I-VOL-1-NO-1
Superfund Accelerated Cleanup Bulletin.
Volume 1, Number 1. Presumptive Remedies
for Municipal Landfill Sites.
PB92-963367/CDH See 0117
OSWER-9203.1-02I-VOL-1-NO-2
Superfund Accelerated Cleanup Bulletin: Pre-
sumptive Remedies for Wood Treatment Facili-
ties. Volume 1, Number 2, May 1992.
PB92-963361/CDH See 0116
OSWER-9203.1-02I-VOL-1-NO-3
Superfund Accelerated Cleanup Bulletin.
Volume 1, Number 3. Presumptive Remedies.
PB92-963371 /CDH See 0118
OSWER-9203.1-02I-VOL-1-NO-4
Superfund Accelerated Cleanup Model
(SACM). Volume 1, Number 4, November
1992.
PB92-963287/CDH See 0122
OSWER-9203.1-02I-VOL-2-NO-1
Superfund Accelerated Cleanup Bulletin: Pre-
sumptive Remedies for Municipal Landfill Sites.
Volume 2, Number 1, February 1993.
PB93-963269/CDH See 0115
OSWER-9203.1-03
Guidance on Implementation of the Superfund
Accelerated Cleanup Model (SACM) under
CERCLA and the NCP.
PB93-963252/CDH See 0094
OSWER-9203.1-03A
Exercising Flexibility through the Superfund Ac-
celerated Cleanup Model (SACM).
PB93-963253/CDH See 0091
OSWER-9203.1-05I-VOL-1-NO-1
Status of Key SACM Program Management
Issues: Interim Guidance, Volume 1, Number 1,
December 1992.
PB93-963262/CDH See 0113
OSWER-9203.1-05I-VOL-1-NO-2
Early Action and Long-Term Action under
SACM: Interim Guidance, Volume 1, Number 2,
December 1992.
PB93-963263/CDH See 0089
OSWER-9203.1-05I-VOL-1-NO-3
Enforcement under SACM: Interim Guidance.
Volume 1, Number 3, December 1992.
PB93-963264/CDH See 0090
OSWER-9203.1-05I-VOL-1-NO-4
Assessing Sites under SACM: Interim Guid-
ance. Volume 1, Number 4, Deccember 1992.
PB93-963265/CDH See 0084
OSWER-9203.1-05I-VOL-1-NO-5
SACM Regional Decision Teams: Interim Guid-
ance. Volume 1, Number 5, December 1992.
PB93-963266/CDH See 0111
OSWER-9203.1-06
Guidance on Setting Priorities for NPL Candi-
date Sites.
PB93-963333/CDH See 0344
OSWER-9203.1-07I-VOL-1-NO-1
HSED SACM Report Volume 1, Number 1,
January 1993.
PB93-963289/CDH See 0096
OSWER-9203.1-08
Further Direction on Implementing the Super-
fund Accelerated Cleanup Model (SACM).
PB93-963291/CDH See 0093
OSWER-9203.1-10FS
Superfund Accelerated Cleanup Model
(SACM): Questions and Answers.
PB93-963286/CDH See 0121
OSWER-9203.1-11
Superfund Accelerated Cleanup Model (SACM)
Coordination Strategy.
PB94-963201/CDH See 0120
OSWER-9203.1-13
Expectations for Full Implementation of SACM.
PB94:963219/CDH See 0092
OSWER-9221.2-01FS
CERCLIS - WasteLAN - CleanLAN.
PB91-921316/CDH See 0015
OSWER-9230.0-03C
Community Relations in Superfund: A Hand-
book.
PB92-963341/CDH See 0467
NU-27
-------
OSWER-9230.0-05FSA
NUMBER INDEX
OSWER-9230.0-05FSA
Suparfund Fact Sheet Arsenic.
PS93-963305/CDH See 0488
OSWER-9230.0-05FSB
Supwfund Fact Sheet; Exposure Pathways.
PB93-963306/CDH See 0393
OSWER-9230.0-05FSC
Superfund Fact Shoot: Trichloraethylene.
FgB3-9633q7/pC>H ........................ See 0496
See 0489
Superfond Fact Sheet Benzene.
P893-963306/CDH
OSWER-9230.0-05FSF
Suporfund Fact Sheet: PCBs.
PB93-963309/CDH See 0492
OSWER-9230.0.05FSG
Suportund Fact Sheet The Removal Program.
PB93-963310/CDH See 0495
OSWER:9230.(W35FSH
Suporfund Fact Sheet An Overview.
PB93-96331 1 /CDH See 0487
OSWER-9230.0-05FSI
Suporfund Fact Sheet: Community Interviews.
P883-963312/CDH See 0490
OSWER-9230.0-05FSJ
Superfund Fact Sheet Public Involvement.
PBS3-963313/CDH See 0493
OSWER-9230.0-05FSK
Superfund Fact Sheet Identifying Sites.
PB93-963314/CDH See 0491
OSWER-9230.0-05FSM
Supetfund Fact Sheet The Remedial Program.
P893-963315/CDH See 0494
OSWER-9230.0-13
Minimizing Problems Caused by Staff Turnover
(Suporfund Management Review: Recommen-
dalfcm No. 43, M, N. O).
P19J.8g134,5/CpH .................................... See 0105
OSWER-9230,0-16
MSffifl Suporfund Documents Available to the
Public throughout the Cleanup Process, and
Discussing Site Findings and Decisions as
They aro Devefoped (Superfund Management
Review No. 43 G, H, Q, R. T).
PS91-921322/CDH See 0100
O8WER-9230.0-17
Using State and Local Officials to Assist in
Community Relations (Superfund Management
Rgvtew: Recommendation, fijp. 43.K.L).
r^j-iaisao/ppp;;;;,; ;,;;,,;;; : ' ; ...... see 0121
OSWpR-9230.0-20 .........................................
InnoyaKva Mothods to Increase Public Involve-
nip ,,]0 Superfund Community Relations (Su-
pgund Management Review Recommenda-
tfcm No. 43.A).
PB81-921344/CDH See 0097
OSWER.9230.0-23FS
Homeowners Exempted from Superfund Clean-
up Costs: National Pojtcy Overview.
PB92.963336/CQH See 0426
OSWER-9230.1-OS/FSA
Superfund Technical Assistance Grants (Fact
Shcal)
PB93-963301 See 0503
OSlrfSR-9230.1-08
SujjMmd technical Assistance Grants
(TAGs) (Pamphlet).
PB93-963302 See 0505
,
Suporfund Technical Assistance Grant (TAG)
Handbook Applying for Your Grant.
P8S3-963352 See 0500
OSWER-9230.1-09B
Superfund Technical Assistance Grant (TAG)
Handbook: The Application Forms with Instruc-
tions.
PB93-963353 See 0501
OSWER-9234.1-06
Applicability of Land Disposal Restrictions to
RCRA and CERCLA Ground Water Treatment
Reinjection Superfund Management Review:
Recommendation No. 26.
PB91-921332/CDH See 1430
OSWER-9234.2-01 FS-A
ARARs Q's and A's: General Policy, RCRA,
CWA, SDWA, Post-ROD Information, and Con-
tingent Waivers.
PB91-921341/CDH See 0401
OSWER-9234.2-13FS
ARARs Q's and A's: The Fund-Balancing
Waiver.
PB91-921321/CDH See 0403
OSWER-9234.2-15FS
ARARs Q's and A's Compliance with New
SDWA National Primary Drinking Water Regu-
lations for Organic and Inorganic Chemicals.
PB91-921363/CDH See 0400
OSWER-9234.2-22FS
ARARs Fact Sheet: Compliance with the Clean
Air Act and Associated Air Quality Require-
ments.
PB92-963282/CDH See 0397
OSWER-9234.2-25
Guidance for Evaluating the Technical Imprac-
ticability of Ground-Water Restoration.
PB93-963507/CDH See 1460
OSWER-9240.0-01A
User's Guide to the Contract Laboratory Pro-
gram.
PB91-214296/CDH See 0079
OSWER-9240.0-01D
User's Guide to the Contract Laboratory Pro-
gram.
PB91-921278/CDH See 0080
OSWER-9240.0-02B
Extending the Tracking of Analytical Services
to Potentially Responsible Party-Lead Super-
fund Sites (Supplemental Guidance on
OSWER Directive 9240.0-2A).
PB93-963502/CDH See 0986
OSWER-9240.0-05A
Specifications and Guidance for Contaminant-
Free Sample Containers.
PB93-963316/CDH See 0994
OSWER-9240.0-06
Sampler's Guide to the Contract Laboratory
Program.
PB91-921330/CDH See 0071
OSWER-9240.0-25
Reassignment of CLP Transportation Func-
tions.
PB93-963501/CDH See 0063
OSWER-9240.1-05
USEPA Contract Laboratory Program National
Functional Guidelines for Organic Data
Review.
PB94-963501/CDH See 0077
OSWER-9240.1-05-01
USEPA Contract Laboratory Program National
Functional Guidelines for Inorganic Data
Review.
PB94-963502/CDH See 0997
OSWER-9242.2-03
Administrative Guidance for the FIT to ARCS
(FIT/ARCS) Transition.
PB92-963332/CDH See 0017
OSWER-9242.2-05
Implementation of the Alternative Remedial
Contracting Strategy (ARCS) Task Force Rec-
ommendations: Transmittal of the Implementa-
tion Plan.
PB92-963258/CDH See 0030
OSWER-9242.2-06
Superfund Contracts Management Issues.
PB92-963257/CDH See 0072
OSWER-9242.2-06A
Resources for Preparing Independent Govern-
ment Estimates for Remedial Contracting Work
Assignments.
PB93-963267/CDH See 0066
OSWER-9242.2-08FS
Superfund Response Action Contracts.
PB93-963292/CDH See 0074
OSWER-9242.3-08
Revision of Policy Regarding Superfund
Project Assignment between Alternative Reme-
dial Contracting Strategy Contractors and the
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers.
PB92-963327/CDH See 0068
OSWER-9242.3-09
Use of Time and Materials and Cost Reim-
bursement Subcontracts for Remedial Actions
under the Alternative Remedial Contracting
Strategy Contracts.
PB93-963282/CDH See 1141
OSWER-9242.3-10
Congressional Limits for FY 92 Alternative Re-
medial Contracting Strategy (ARCS) Program
Management Costs.
PB92-963260/CDH See 0022
OSWER-9242.6-05
Headquarters Support Contract Management
Procedures.
PB91-921335/CDH See 0029
OSWER-9242.6-08
Total Quality Management (TQM) and Quality
Assurance (QA) In Superfund.
PB91-921333/CDH See 0996
OSWER-9242.6-10
Long-Term Contracting Strategy for Superfund
- Implementation.
PB91-921358/CDH See 0043
OSWER-9242.6-12
Mentor-Protege Program.
PB93-963251/CDH See 0044
OSWER-9242.6-13
Performance Tracking under ARCS Contracts.
PB93-963276/CDH See 0061
OSWER-9272.0-06
Compendium of Federal Facilities Directives,
1984 and 1985.
PB91-921280/CDH See 0896
OSWER-9280.0-02
Policy on Floodplains and Wetland Assess-
ments for CERCLA Actions.
PB91-921329/CDH See 0437
OSWER-9283.1-03
Suggested ROD Language for Various Ground
Water Remediation Options.
PB91-921325/CDH See 1475
NU-28
-------
NUMBER INDEX
OSWER-9345.1-08
OSWER-9283.1-06
Considerations in Ground-Water Remediation
at Superfund Sites and RCRA Facilities:
Update.
PB92-963358/CDH See 1437
OSWER-9285.0-01A
OSWER Integrated Health and Safety Stand-
ard Operating Practices.
PB93-963401/CDH See 0921
OSWER-9285.1-02
Health and Safety Roles and Responsibilities
at Remedial Sites.
PB91-921362/CDH See 0918
OSWER-9285.1-03
Standard Operating Safety Guides.
PB92-963414/CDH See 0925
OSWER-9285.2-06FS
Establishing Work Zones at Uncontrolled Haz-
ardous Waste Sites.
PB91-921342/CDH See 0908
OSWER-9285.2-07FS
Hazardous Waste Operations and Emergency
Response: RCRA TSD and Emergency Re-
sponse Without Regard to Location.
PB91-921340/CDH See 0914
OSWER-9285.2-08FS
Hazardous Waste Operations and Emergency
Response: Uncontrolled Hazardous Waste
Sites and RCRA Corrective Actions.
PB91-921339/CDH ' See 0425
OSWER-9285.3-03
Field Certification Tracking System (FCTS).
User's Guide. Version 2.1.
PB93-963415/CDH See 0909
OSWER-9285.3-06
Priority for Health and Safety Requirements,
Especially Medical Surveillance Requirements,
for EPA Employees Who Support OSWER Pro-
grams.
PB91-921346/CDH See 0923
OSWER-9285.4-06
ATSDR Health Consultations under CERCLA.
PB93-963334/CDH See 1018
OSWER-9285.6-03
Risk Assessment Guidance for Superfund.
Volume 1. Human Health Evaluation Manual.
Supplemental Guidance: 'Standard Default Ex-
posure Factors'.
PB91-921314/CDH See 1071
OSWER-9285.6-04FS
Emergency Responders Agreements for Fund-
Lead Remedial Actions.
PB93-963418/CDH See 1001
OSWER-9285.7-01B
Risk Assessment Guidance for Superfund.
Volume 1. Human Health Evaluation Manual
(Part B, Development of Risk-Based Prelimi-
nary Remediation Goals).
PB92-963333/CDH See 1068
OSWER-9285.7-01BFS
Risk Assessment Guidance for Superfund.
Volume 1. Human Health Evaluation Manual
(Part B).
PB92-963339/CDH See 1067
OSWER-9285.7-01C
Risk Assessment Guidance for Superfund.
Volume 1. Human Health Evaluation Manual
(Part C, Risk Evaluation of Remedial Alterna-
tives).
PB92-963334/CDH See 1070
OSWER-9285.7-01CFS
Risk Assessment Guidance for Superfund.
Volume 1. Human Health Evaluation Manual
(Part C).
PB92-963340/CDH See 1069
OSWER-9285.7-05
Risk Assessment in Superfund: A Primer. First
Edition, September 1990.
PB91-214197/CDH See 1073
OSWER-9285.7-08FS
Understanding Superfund Risk Assessment.
PB92-963372/CDH See 0508
OSWER-9285.7-08I-VOL-1-NO-1
Supplemental Guidance to RAGS: Calculating
the Concentration Term. Volume 1, Number 1,
May 1992.
PB92-963373/CDH See 1079
OSWER-9285.7-09A
Guidance for Data Useability in Risk Assess-
ment (Part A).
PB92-963356/CDH See 1033
OSWER-9285.7-09B
Guidance for Data Useability in Risk Assess-
ment (Part B).
PB92-963362/CDH See 1034
OSWER-9285.7-09FS
Guidance for Data Useability in Risk Assess-
ment
PB92-963363/CDH See 1031
OSWER-9285.7-13
Implementing the Deputy Administrator's Risk
Characterization Memorandum.
PB93-963317/CDH See 1056
OSWER-9285.7-16
Use of IRIS Values in Superfund Risk Assess-
ment.
PB93-963360/CDH See 1081
OSWER-9285.8-01
Health and Safety Plan (HASP) User's Guide
(Version 3.0/4.0).
PB93-963414/CDH See 0917
OSWER-9320.1-10
Compendium of NPL Listing Policies and Pro-
cedures, 1982 to 1985.
PB91 -921281 /CDH See 0338
OSWER-9320.1-11
Discussions with the Public Concerning NPL
PB93-963338/CDH See 0339
OSWER-9320.2-3C
Update No. 2 to 'Procedures for Completion
and Deletion of NPL Sites'.
PB92-963344/CDH See 0395
OSWER-9320.2-05
Amendment to Historical Definitions of NPL
Deletion Start and Completion Dates.
PB93-963278/CDH See 0335
OSWER-9320.2-06
NPL Construction Completion Definition at
Bioremediation and Soil Vapor Extraction Sites.
PB93-963327/CDH See 0365
OSWER-9320.2-07
Additional Guidance on 'Worst Sites' and 'NPL
Caliber Sites' to Assist in SACM Implementa-
tion.
PB94-963206/CDH See 0083
OSWER-9320.3-08
CERCLIS Listing.
PB91-921348/CDH See 0014
OSWER-9320.7-08
FACT BOOK: National Priorities List under the
Original Hazard Ranking System, 1981-1991.
PB93-963350/CDH See 0340
OSWER-9330.2-13FS
Guide to Discharging CERCLA Aqueous
Wastes to Publicly Owned Treatment Works
(POTWs).
PB91-921364/CDH See 0423
OSWER-9345.0-01A
Guidance for Performing Preliminary Assess-
ments under CERCLA.
PB92-963303/CDH See 0342
OSWER-9345.0-05I-VOL-1-NO-1
ECO Update: The Role of BTAGs in Ecological
Assessment. Volume 1, Number 1, September
1991.
PB92-963337/CDH See 1020
OSWER-9345.0-05I-VOL-1-NO-2
ECO Update: Ecological Assessment of Super-
fund Sites. An Overview. Volume 1, Number 2,
December 1991.
PB92-963335/CDH See 1019
OSWER-9345.0-05I-VOL-1-NO-3
ECO Update. Volume 1, Number 3. The Role
,of Natural Resource Trustees in the Superfund
Process.
PB92-963369/CDH See 1021
ECO Update. Volume 1, Number 4. Developing
a Work Scope for Ecological Assessments.
PB92-963370/CDH See 1022
OSWER-9345.0-05I-VOL-1-NO-5
ECO Update. Volume 1, Number 5, August
1992. Briefing the BTAG: Initial Description of
Setting, History, and Ecology of a Site.
PB92-963374/CDH See 1023
OSWER-9345.0-07
Standard Document for Remedial Site Assess-
ment Decisions.
PB93-963268/CDH See 0392
OSWER-9345.0-08
PA Review Checklist.
PB93-963342/CDH See 0366
OSWER-9345.0-09
Military Base Closures: Guidance on EPA Con-
currence in the Identification of Uncontaminat-
ed Parcels under CERCLA Section 120(h)(4).
PB94-963249/CDH See 0899
OSWER-9345.1-03FS
Revised Hazard Ranking System: Evaluating
Sites After Waste Removals.
PB92-963326/CDH See 0379
OSWER-9345.1-04
PREscore Software. Users Manual and Tutori-
al. Version 1.0.
PB92-963349/CDH See 0374
OSWER-9345.1-05
Guidance for Performing Site Inspections
under CERCLA.
PB92-963375/CDH See 0343
OSWER-9345.1-07
Hazard Ranking System Guidance Manual.
PB92-963377/CDH See 0346
OSWER-9345.1-07FS
Hazard Ranking System Guidance Manual.
PB93-963356/CDH See 0347
OSWER-9345.1-08
Regional Quality Control Guidance for NPL
Candidate Sites.
PB92-963352/CDH See 0376
NU-29
-------
OSWER-9345.1-09-0
NUMBER INDEX
OSWER-9346.1-09-0
NPL Characterization Project National Results.
PB82-963304/CDH Sea 0355
OSWER-9345.1-09-1
NPt Characterization Project Region 1 Re-
suds.
RB92-963305/CDH See 0356
OSWER-9345.1-09-3
NPL Characterization Project Region 3 Re-
SUjta,
PB92-963307/CDH See 0357
, ................ , ......... , ......... .,.. , , .. ..... ,, .........
NPL Characterization Project: Region 4 Re-
sutts.
PB92.963308/COH See 0358
OSWER-9345.1-09-5
NPL Characterization Project Region 5 Re-
suits,
PB92-963309/CDH See 0359
OSWER-9345.1-09-6
NPL Characterization Project Region 6 Re-
sWts,
PB92-963310/CDH See 0360
OSWER.9345.1-09-7
NPL Characterization Project Region 7 Re-
suits.
PB82-96331 1 /CDH Sea 0361
OSWER-9345.1-03-8
NPL Characterization Project Region 8 Re-
, ' PB92-963312/CDH ...........................
O8WER-9345.1-09-9
NPL Characterization Project Region 9 Re-
SUHS, .........................
PB92-963313/CDH See 0363
See 0362
i .........
NfL' Characterization'1 Project Region 10 Re-
sjljjs. "
P|8?.$63314/COH""""" ...... !' ...... See 0364
OS|(|R-9345,1^p-0 "~ ; '„'''" ,"' I,
CpRCLtS Characterization Project: National
Ffe*s.,; ' " ...... '::; ,;;; ........
PB92.963315/CDH See 0001
OSWER-934S.1.10-1
CERCLIS Characterization Project: Region 1
Results,
P892.963316/CDH Sea 0002
OSWER-9345.1-10-2
CfeRCLIS Characterization Project Region 2
Results.
PB92-963317/COH See 0003
OSWER-9345.1-10-3
CERCLIS Characterization Project Region 3
Results.
PB92.963318/CDH See 0004
O8l|R-9345lt-lb4l I" "„,"" .' ', ............. ." . ,' .....
ciRCLIS Characjerizatton Project Region 4
Results.
P892-963319/CDH „ ..... ............ r , See 0005
" <5SWER-9345.1-10-5 ...................
CiRCLtS Characterization Project: Region 5
Results. ........................................
P|82-963320/CbH See 0006
OSWER-9345.1-10-6
CERCLIS Characterization Project Region 6
Results.
P892-963321/CDH See 0007
OSWER-9345.1-10-7
CERCLIS Characterization Project Region 7
Results.
P|92-963322/CDH See OOQ8
OSWER-9345.1-10-8
CERCLIS Characterization Project Region 8
Results.
PB92-963323/CDH See 0009
OSWER-9345.1-10-9
CERCLIS Characterization Project Region 9
Results.
PB92-963324/CDH See 0010
OSWER-9345.1-10-10
CERCLIS Characterization Project: Region 10
Results.
PB92-963325/CDH SeeP°11
OSWER-9345.1-11 ..............................................
PA-Score Software, Version 1.0. Users Manual
and Tutorial.
PB92-963302/CDH See 0371
OSWER-9345.1-14
Supplemental Guide to Video on Superfund
Site Assessment Screening: A National Priori-
ty.
PB93-963323/CDH See 0394
OSWER-9345.1-16FS
Integrating Removal and Remedial Site As-
sessment Investigations.
PB93-963341/CDH See 0939
OSWER-9345.3-02
Management of Investigation-Derived Wastes
during Site Inspections.
PB91-921331/CDH See 0349
OSWER-9345.3-03FS
Guide to Management of Investigation-Derived
Wastes.
PB92-963353/CDH See 0345
OSWER-9345.4-02FS
Guide to Community Involvement for Site As-
sessment Managers.
. PB93-963348/CDH ' See 0476
OSWER-9345i!4-03FS
Site Assessment Evaluating Risks at Super-
fund Sites.
' ' "" "
OSWER-9347.3-06FS '
Superfund LDR Guide No. 6A (2nd Edition)
Obtaining a Soil and Debris Treatability Vari-
ance for Remedial Actions.
PB91-921327/CDH Sea 0445
OSWER-9347.3-08FS
Superfund LDR Guide No. 7. Determining
When Land Disposal Restrictions (LDRs) Are
Relevant and Appropriate to CERCLA Re-
sponse Actions.
PB91-214122/CDH See 0446
OSWER-9347.3-10FS
Guide to Obtaining No Migration Variances for
CERCLA Remedial Actions.
PB91-921367/CDH See 0424
OSWER-9347.3-12FS
Superfund Guide to RCRA Management Re-
quirements for Mineral Processing Wastes.
PB91 -921 31 8/CDH See 0439
OSWER-9355.0-30
Role of the Baseline Risk Assessment in Su-
perfund Remedy Selection Decisions.
PB91-921359/CDH See 1075
OSWER-9355.0-36
FY 1992 Themes for Regional Coordination to
Support Continuous Improvements of Super-
fund's Remedial Program.
PB92-963368/CDH See 1091
OSWER-9355.0-39FS
Remedial Action Report: Documentation for
Operable Unit Completion.
PB92-963364/CDH See 1134
OSWER-9355.0-47FS
Presumptive Remedies: Policy and Procedures.
PB93-963345/CDH See 1103
OSWER-9355.0-48FS
Presumptive Remedies: Site Characterization
and Technology Selection for CERCLA Sites
with Volatile Organic Compounds in Soils.
PB93-963346/CDH See 1104
OSWER-9355.0-49FS
Presumptive Remedy for CERCLA Municipal
Landfill Sites.
PB93-963339/CDH See 1105
OSWER-9355.3-02FS-3
Guide to Developing Superfund No Action, In-
terim Action, and Contingency Remedy RODs.
PB91-921350/CDH See 1098
OSWER-9355.3-02FS-4
Guide to Addressing Pre-ROD and Post-ROD
Changes.
PB91-921351/CDH See 1096
OSWER-9355.3-17
Compendium of ROD Language for FY 1993
Focus Areas.
PB93-963328/CDH See 1083
OSWER-9355.3-20
Revisions to OMB Circular A-94 on Guidelines
and Discount Rates for Benefit-Cost Analysis.
PB93-963297/CDH See 1107
OSWER-9355.4-02
Interim Guidance on Establishing Soil Lead
Cleanup Levels at Superfund Sites. Supple-
ment to Interim Guidance on Establishing Soil
Lead Cleanup Levels at Superfund Sites.
PB91-921352/CDH See 1516
OSWER-9355.4-02A
interim Guidance on Establishing Soil Lead
Cleanup Levels at Superfund Sites. Supple-
ment to Interim Guidance on Establishing Soil
Lead Cleanup Levels at Superfund Sites.
PB91-921352/CDH See 1516
OSWER-9355.4-04FS
Guide: Methods for Evaluating the Attainment
of Cleanup Standards for Soils and Solid
Media.
PB91-921365/CDH See 1508
OSWER-9355.4-05
Evaluation of Ground-Water Extraction Reme-
dies: Phase 2. Volume 1. Summary Report.
PB92-963346/CDH See 1444
OSWER-9355.4-05A
Evaluation of Ground-Water Extraction Reme-
dies: Phase 2. Volume 2. Case Studies and
Updates.
PB92-963347/CDH See 1445
OSWER-9355.4-06
Summary of Treatment Technology Effective-
ness for Contaminated Soil.
PB92-963351/CDH See 1533
OSWER-9355.4-07FS
Estimating Potential for Occurrence of DNAPL
at Superfund Sites.
PB92-963338/CDH See 1442
OSWER-9355.4-13
Evaluation of the Likelihood of DNAPL Pres-
ence at NPL Sites: National Results.
PB93-963343/CDH See 1448
OSWER-9355.4-14-1
Technical Background Document for Draft Soil
Screening Level Guidance.
PB94-963503/CDH See 1537
lii/xllilllli „ lliilHIU
'• '"fli,,,:1 :
-------
NUMBER INDEX
OSWER-9360.7-13FS
OSWER-9355.4-14FS
Distribution of DRAFT Soil Screening Level
Guidance.
PB93-963508/CDH See 1500
OSWER-9355.5-05FSA
Procedure for Use of USAGE Prepiaced Con-
tracts to Expedite Superfund Cleanup Tasks.
PB94-963243/CDH See 1131
OSWER-9355.5-07FS
Real Estate Acquisition Procedures for USAGE
Projects.
PB91-921355/CDH See 1133
OSWER-9355.5-16FS
EPA Oversight of Remedial Designs and Re-
medial Actions Performed by PRPs.
PB91-921357/CDH See 1124
OSWER-9355.6-04
ROD Annual Report, FY 1990.
PB91-921277/CDH See 1112
OSWER-9355.6-05-1
ROD Annual Report, FY1991. Volume 1.
PB92-963359/CDH See 1113
OSWER-9355.6-05-2
ROD Annual Report, FY1991. Volume 2.
PB92-963360/CDH See 1114
OSWER-9355.6-06
ROD Annual Report, FY 1992.
PB93-963349/CDH See 1115
OSWER-9355.7-02
Structure and Components of Five-Year Re-
views.
PB91-921369/CDH See 1121
OSWER-9355.7-02FS1
Structure and Components of Five-Year Re-
views.
PB91-921368/CDH See 1120
OSWER-9355.7-03
Permits and Permit 'Equivalency' Processes for
CERCLA On-Site Response Actions.
PB93-963325/CDH See 0435
OSWER-9355.9-01
Data Quality Objectives Process for Superfund:
Interim Final Guidance.
PB94-963203/CDH See 0983
OSWER-9355.9-01A
Data Quality Objectives Process for Superfund:
Workbook.
PB94-963204/CDH See 0984
OSWER-9355.9-01FS
Data Quality Objectives Process for Superfund.
PB94-963205/CDH See 0981
OSWER-9355.9-03
Data Quality Objectives Process for Superfund.
PB94-963207/CDH See 0982
OSWER-9355.9-04A
Data Quality Objectives Decision Error Feasi-
bility Trials (DEFT) Beta Version 1.01. User's
Guide.
PB94-963222/CDH See 0979
OSWER-9355.15FS
U.S. Bureau of Reclamation Assistance to the
Superfund Program.
PB91-921319/CDH See 1138
OSWER-9360.0-10
Expedited Response Actions.
PB93-963410/CDH See 1003
OSWER-9360.0.13
Guidance on Implementation of the 'Contribute
to Remedial Performance' Provision.
PB93-963413/CDH See 1093
OSWER-9360.0-22FS
Oil Notifications: Emergency Response Notifi-
cation System (ERNS) Fact Sheet.
PB92-963413/CDH See 0930
OSWER-9360.0-23FS
CERCLA Notifications: Emergency Response
Notification System (ERNS) Fact Sheet.
PB92-963411/CDH See 0926
OSWER-9360.0-29FS
Overview of ERNS: Emergency Response No-
tification System (ERNS) Fact Sheet.
PB92-963412/CDH See 0935
OSWER-9360.0-31FS
Effect of OSHA's Bloodborne Pathogens
Standard on Hazardous Waste Cleanup Activi-
ties.
PB93-963419/CDH See 1026
OSWER-9360.0-32
Guidance on Conducting Non-Time-Critical Re-
moval Actions under CERCLA.
PB93-963402/CDH See 1005
OSWER-9360.0-32FS
Conducting Non-Time-Critical Removal Actions
under CERCLA.
PB93-963422/CDH See 0999
OSWER-9360.0-34
Determination of Imminent and Substantial En-
dangerment for Removal Actions.
PB93-963416/CDH See 1000
OSWER-9360.0-46FS
Technology Selection Guide for Wood Treater
Sites.
PB93-963329/CDH See 1122
OSWER-9360.2-02
Policy on Management of Post-Removal Site
Control.
PB91-921326/CDH See 1008
OSWER-9360.2-04
Authorization for Regional Administrators to
Approve Consistency Exemptions at NPL
Sites.
PB92-963343/CDH See 0998
OSWER-9360.2-04A
Clarification of Delegation to Approve Consist-
ency Exemptions at NPL Sites.
PB93-963281/CDH See 0336
OSWER-9360.3-01FS
Guide to Developing Action Memorandums.
PB91-921317/CDH , See 1097
OSWER-9360.3-02
Superfund Removal Procedures: Guidance on
the Consideration of ARARS during Removal
Actions.
PB92-963401/CDH See 1013
OSWER-9360.3-02FS
Consideration of ARARs during Removal Ac-
tions.
PB92-963410/CDH ' See 0419
OSWER-9360.3-Q5
Superfund Removal Procedures: Public Partici-
pation Guidance for On-Scene Coordinators:
Community Relations and the Administrative
Record.
PB92-963416/CDH See 1014
OSWER-9360.3-06
Superfund Removal Procedures: Removal En-
forcement Guidance for On-Scene Coordina-
tors.
PB92-963409/CDH See 1015
OSWER-9360.3-06FS
Guide to Removal Enforcement.
PB92-963419/CDH See 1006
OSWER-9360.4-02
Compendium of ERT Soil Sampling and Sur-
face Geophysics Procedures.
PB91-921273/CDH See 0904
OSWER-9360.4-03
Compendium of ERT Surface Water and Sedi-
ment Sampling Procedures.
PB91 -921274/CDH See 0905
OSWER-9360.4-04
Compendium of ERT Field Analytical Proce-
dures.
PB92-963405/CDH See 0902
OSWER-9360.4-05
Compendium of ERT Air Sampling Procedures.
PB92-963406/CDH See 0901
OSWER-9360.4-06
Compendium of ERT Groundwater Sampling
Procedures.
PB91-921275/CDH See 0903
OSWER-9360.4-07
Compendium of ERT Waste Sampling Proce-
dures.
PB91-921276/CDH See 0907
OSWER-9360.4-08
Compendium of ERT Toxicity Testing Proce-
dures.
PB91-921271/CDH See 0906
OSWER-9360.4-10
Removal Program Representative Sampling
Guidance. Volume 1. Soil.
PB92-963408/CDH See 1010
OSWER-9360.6-06
Superfund Emergency Response Actions: A
Summary of Federally-Funded Removals. Fifth
Annual Report - Fiscal Year 1990.
PB92-963403/CDH See 0313
OSWER-9360.6-08
Technical Assistance Team (TAT) Contracts
Users' Manual.
PB92-963407/CDH See 0075
OSWER-9360.6-09
Superfund Emergency Response Actions: A
Summary of Federally-Funded Removals. Sixth
Annual Report, Fiscal Year 1991.
PB92-963421/CDH See 0315
OSWER-9360.7-02
Continuous Release - Emergency Response
Notification System. User's Manual for Indus-
try.
PB91-921287/CDH See 1145
OSWER-9360.7-08FS
Notification Requirements for Continuous Re-
leases of Hazardous Substances.
PB92-963422/CDH See 1148
OSWER-9360.7-11
Questions and Answers on Release Notifica-
tion Requirements and Reportable Quantity
Adjustments.
PB93-963411/CDH See 1149
OSWER-9360.7-12FS
Superfund Guide: Clean Air Act Hazardous Air
Pollutants Added to the List of CERCLA Haz-
ardous Substances.
PB93-963425/CDH See 1151
OSWER-9360.7-13FS
Superfund Guide: Reportable Quantity Adjust-
ment for Methyl Isocyanate (MIC).
PB93-963424/CDH See 1152
NU-31
-------
OSWER-9360.8-01FS
NUMBER INDEX
OSWER.9366.8-01FS
OPA Q's and A's: Overview of tha Oil Pollution
Act of 1990.
PB92-963348/CPH See 0933
OsiiR-9360.8-05
09 Spf Contingency Planning: National Status.
Aj.B'eport to the President,
P|9J-f 21282/COHl'. I'I, See 0931
08WER.9360.84)6FS
Faciity Response Plans.
PB93-963406/CDH See 0929
OSWER-9360.8-17FS
Personal Air Sampling and Air Monitoring Re-
qutramonta under 29 CFR 1910.120.
PS93-963420/CDH See 0922
OSWER-9375.5-03FS-A
Potitfcal Subdivision involvement in Superfund.
P892-963330/CDH See 0480
OSWER.9375.5-P4FS-A
Audits and tha Superfund Program Manager.
PI92-963328/CDH See 0087
OSWER-9375.5-06A/FS '^_ ' ',,
dS ol Reinetiial'Aclon Model.
PB93-963304/CDH See 1085
Supodund: Qualified '" Disadvantaged ' Business
Ujjfzatiqn, in State Response.
PB92-963283/CDH See 0498
OSiSER-9375.S-i9
Cost of Remedial Actions (CORA) Model:
Ovwvtow and Applications.
PB93-963318/CDH See 1086
OSWER-9375.6-08B
Analysis of Stats Superfund Programs: 50-
Stata Study. 1991 Update.
PB92-963418/CDH See 0449
OSWER-9375.7-01
Ensuring tha Adequacy of Cost Share Provi-
sions In Suporfund Stats Contracts.
PS93-963336/CDH Sea 0472
OSWER-9375.7-02
Obfigation of Funds under Superfund State
Contracts.
PS03-963326/COH See 0478
OSVVER-9380.0-17,, ,1 ........ ' ,11 . '".. .'
Furthering "tha Use of innovative Treatment
Technotogtas in OSWER Programs.
P691-921336/COH See 1255
OSWER-9380.0-17FS
Furthering tha Use of Innovative Treatment
Techncjogtes In OSWER Programs.
P§|i-921366/CDH See 1256
OSWER-9380.6-19
Innovative Troatmont Technologies: Semi-
Annual Status Report, January 1991. Rrst
PS91-921290/CDH See 1274
OSWER-9380.0-48
Suporfuod Innovative Technology Evaluation
Technology Demonstration Summary: Chemfix
SoWfieaUon/Stabiiizatlon Process, Clackamas,
Oregon.
PS91-921373/CDH See 1564
OSf 16^380.1-07 III ',"~ ........ ',', 1'" ."
Accessing Fedora! Data Bases for Contaminat-
ad Site Qoan-Up Technologies.
PS91-821288/CDH See 1188
OSWER-9380.1-OS
Btbjography of Federal Reports and Publica-
tions Describing Alternative and Innovative
Treatment Technologies for Corrective Action
and Site Remediation.
PB91-921293/CDH See 1206
OSWER-9380.1-10FS
Characterization Protocol for Radioactive Con-
taminated Soils.
PB92-963354/CDH See 1494
OSWER-9380.1-12
Vendor Information Form to be Completed for
Participation in the: Vendor Information System
for Innovative Treatment Technologies
(VISITT).
PB91-921289/CDH See 1369
OSWER-9380.1-13
Survey of Materials-Handling Technologies
Used at Hazardous Waste Sites.
PB91-921283/CDH See 1323
OSWER-9380.1-14
Technical Support Services for Superfund Site
Remediation. Second Edition.
PB91-921285/CDH Sea 1335
OSWER-9380.3-08FS
Regional Guide: Issuing Site-Specific Treatabil-
ity Variances for Contaminated Soils and
Debris from Land Disposal Restrictions (LDRs).
PB92-963284/CDH See 1528
OSWER-9380.7-01FS
Guide to Pump and Treat Groundwater Reme-
diation Technology.
PB91-921356/CDH See 1462
OSWER-9380.7/03A
Superfund Engineering Issue: Treatment of
Lead-Contaminated Soils.
PB91-921291/CDH See 1535
OSWER-9800.1-01
Limiting Lead Transfers to Private Parties
during Discrete Phases of the Remedial Proc-
ess.
PB92-963602/CDH See 0571
OSWER-9800.3
Superfund Desk Reference for Municipalities.
PB91-193409/CDH See 0486
OSWER-9832.11FS
Summary of 'Guidance on Documenting Deci-
sions Not to Take Cost Recovery Actions'.
PB91-228338/CDH See 0874
OSWER-9832.12-1A
Supplemental Guidance on Federal Superfund
Liens.
PB93-963618/CDH See 0885
OSWER-9832.18
Written Demand for Recovery of Costs In-
curred Under the Comprehensive Environmen-
tal Response, Compensation, and Liability Act
(CERCLA).
PB91-228742/CDH See 0895
OSWER-9832.22
Interim Cashout Settlement Procedures.
PB92-963609/CDH See 0558
OSWER-9833.5
Guidance on Procedures for Submitting
CERCLA Section 106(b) Reimbursement Peti-
tions and on EPA Review of Those Petitions.
PB92-963610/CDH See 0555
OSWER-9833.06
: Model Administrative Order on Consent for Re-
moval Actions.
PB93-963605/CDH See 0574
OSWER-9833.07
Model Unilateral Administrative Order for Re-
moval Response Activities.
PB93-963606/CDH See 0579
OSWER-9834.6FS
Policy Towards Owners of Residential Property
at Superfund Sites.
PB92-963615/CDH See 0587
OSWER-9834.7-1C
Methodology for Early Da Minimis Waste Con-
tributor Settlements under CERCLA Section
See 0573
PB92-963607/CDH
OSWER-9834.7-1D
Streamlined Approach for Settlements with De
Minimis Waste Contributors under CERCLA
Section 122(g)(1)(A).
PB93-963617/CDH See 0870
OSWER-9834.11FS
Overview of the Off-Site Policy for OSCs and
RPMs.
PB92-963603/CDH See 0433
OSWER-9834.17
Guidance on CERCLA Settlements with De Mi-
cromis Waste Contributors.
PB93-963619/CDH See 0547
OSWER-9835.4-2B
Accelerating Potentially Responsible Party Re-
medial Design Starts: Implementing the 30-Day
Study.
PB92-963608/CDH See 0509
OSWER-9835.4FS
Summary of 'Interim Guidance: Streamlining
the CERCLA Settlement Decision Process'.
PB91-228270/CDH See 0875
OSWER-9835.9
Guidance on Landowner Liability under Section
107(a)(1) of CERCLA, De Minimis Settlements
under Section 122(g)(1)(B) of CERCLA, and
Settlements with Prospective Purchasers of
Contaminated Property.
PB91-139444/CPH See 0552
OSWER-9835.12-01A
Revised Policy on Discretionary Information
Release under CERCLA.
PB93-963610/CDH See 0600
OSWER-9835.15B
New Policy on Performance of Risk Assess-
ments during Remedial Investigation Feasibility
Studies (RI/FS) Conducted by Potentially Re-
sponsible Parties (PRPs).
PB93-963620/CDH See 1061
OSWER-9835.16
Guidance on Preparing Waste-in Lists and Vol-
umetric Rankings for Release to Potentially
Responsible Parties (PRPs) under CERCLA.
PB92-963606/CDH See 0554
OSWER-9837.2B
Enforcement Project Management Handbook.
PB93-963602/CDH See 0533
OSWER-9839.1FS
Summary of 'Interim Guidelines for Preparing
NBARs'.
PB91-228304/CDH See 0876
OSWER-9850.0-1
Endangerment Assessment Guidance.
PB92-101997/CDH See 0528
OSWER-9850.1
Endangerment Assessment Handbook.
PB92-102144/CDH See 0530
OSWER-9972.00
Roles and Responsibilities of Regional Project
Officers, Zone Project Officers, Work Assign-
ment Managers and Contracting Officers for
NU-32
-------
NUMBER INDEX
PB90-142373/CDH
the RCRA Enforcement, Permitting and Assist-
ance Contracts (REPA).
PB94-963614/CDH See 0070
OSWR DIRECTIVE-9200.31
Superfund Emergency Response Actions: A
Summary of Federally-Funded Removals.
Volume 1.
PB90-197310/CDH See 0316
OWPE-92-CE-001C
CERCLA Enforcement Policy Compendium
Update.
PB92-963623/CDH See 0516
PB82-191990/CDH
Notification of Hazardous Substance Sites
(Section 103(c)).
PB82-191990/CDH See 1147
PB82-213984/CDH
Notification of Hazardous Waste Sites Re-
quired Under Section 103(c) of the Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensa-
tion and Liability Act (CERCLA) of 1980.
PB82-213984/CDH See 1173
PB82-213992/CDH
Notification of Hazardous Waste Sites Re-
quired Under Section 103(c) of the Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensa-
tion and Liability Act (CERCLA) of 1980: EPA
Region 1.
PB82-213992/CDH See 1174
PB82-214008/CDH
Notification of Hazardous Waste Sites Re-
quired Under Section 103(c) of the Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensa-
tion and Liability Act (CERCLA) of 1980: EPA
Region 2.
PB82-214008/CDH See 1175
PB82-214016/CDH
Notification of Hazardous Waste Sites Re-
quired Under Section 103(c) of the Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensa-
tion and Liability Act (CERCLA) of 1980: EPA
Region 3.
PB82-214016/CDH See 1176
PB82-214024/CDH
Notification of Hazardous Waste Sites Re-
quired Under Section 103(c) of the Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensa-
tion and Liability Act (CERCLA) of 1980: EPA
Region 4.
PB82-214024/CDH See 1177
PB82-214032/CDH
Notification of Hazardous Waste Sites Re-
quired Under Section 103(c) of the Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensa-
tion and Liability Act (CERCLA) of 1980: EPA
Region 5.
PB82-214032/CDH See 1178
PB82-214040/CDH
Notification of Hazardous Waste Sites Re-
quired Under Section 103(c) of the Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensa-
tion and Liability Act (CERCLA) of 1980: EPA
Region 6.
PB82-214040/CDH See 1179
PB82-214057/CDH
Notification of Hazardous Waste Sites Re-
quired Under Section 103(c) of the Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensa-
tion and Liability Act (CERCLA) of 1980: EPA
Region 7.
PB82-214057/CDH See 1180
PB82-214065/CDH
Notification of Hazardous Waste Sites Re-
quired Under Section 103(c) of the Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensa-
tion and Liability Act (CERCLA) of 1980: EPA
Region 8.
PB82-214065/CDH See 1181
PB82-214073/CDH
Notification of Hazardous Waste Sites Re-
quired Under Section 103(o) of the Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensa-
tion and Liability Act (CERCLA) of 1980: EPA
Region 9.
PB82-214073/CDH See 1182
PB82-214081/CDH
Notification of Hazardous Waste Sites Re-
quired Under Section 103(c) of the Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensa-
tion and Liability Act (CERCLA) of 1980: EPA
Region 10.
PB82-214081/CDH See 1183
PB89-158810/CDH
Technology Evaluation Report SITE Program
Demonstration Test, HAZCON Solidification,
Douglassville, Pennsylvania. Volume 1.
PB89-158810/CDH See 1569
PB90-103516/CDH
Evaluation of Modifications to Extraction Pro-
cedures Used in Analysis of Environmental
Samples from Superfund Sites.
PB90-103516/CDH See 1247
PB90-106428/CDH
Assessment of International Technologies for
Superfund Applications: Technology Review
and Trip Report Results.
PB90-106428/CDH See 1197
PB90-108242/CDH
Use of 'Selenastrum capricornutum' to Assess
the Toxicity Potential of Surface and Ground
Water Contamination Caused by Chromium
Waste.
PB90-108242/CDH See 1367
PB90-108549/CDH
ARCS (Alternative Remedial Contract Strategy)
Contracts Users' Manual.
PB90-108549/CDH See 0019
PB90-113093/CDH
EPA/ORD (Environmental Protection Agency/
Office of Research and Development) Role
and Perspective in Sediment Research.
PB90-113093/CDH See 1585
PB90-113291/CDH
In-situ Stabilization/Solidification of PCB (Poly-
chlorinated Biphenyls)-Contaminated Soil.
PB90-113291/CDH See 1556
PB90-113374/CDH
Air/Superfund National Technical Guidance
Study Series. Volume 1. Application of Air
Pathway Analyses for Superfund Activities.
PB90-113374/CDH See 1390
PB90-113382/CDH
Air/Superfund National Technical Guidance
Study Series. Volume 4. Procedures for Disper-
sion Modeling and Air Monitoring for Superfund
Air Pathway Analysis.
PB90-113382/CDH See 1394
PB90-119744/CDH
Terra Vac In situ Vacuum Extraction System:
Applications Analysis Report.
PB90-119744/CDH See 1355
PB90-120049/CDH
Toxicity Bioassay and Eluate Heavy Metals
Analysis Results of the Bench Scale Stabiliza-
tion Study of Soils from the United Chrome
Superfund NPL (National Priority List) Site Cor-
vallis, Oregon.
PB90-120049/CDH See 1546
PB90-126665/CDH
Terra Vac In situ Vacuum Extraction System:
Applications Analysis Report.
PB90-126665/CDH See 1356
PB90-127200/CDH
International Conference on New Frontiers for
Hazardous Waste Management (Third) Pro-
ceedings. Held in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania on
September 10-13, 1989.
PB90-127200/CDH See 1278
PB90-127473/CDH
Immobilization Technology Seminar: Speaker
Slide Copies and Supporting Information.
PB90-127473/CDH See 1555
PB90-127523/CDH
Toxicological Profile for Trichloroethylene.
PB90-127523/CDH See 1361
PB90-129263/CDH
Overview of Selected EPA (Environmental Pro-
tection Agency) Regulations and Guidance Af-
fecting POTW (Publicly Owned Treatment
Works) Management.
PB90-129263/CDH See 0432
PB90-129339/CDH
Recent Advances in Risk Reduction Engineer-
ing.
PB90-129339/CDH See 1064
PB90-130188/CDH
Hydrogeology and Results of Aquifer Tests in
the Vicinity of a Hazardous-Waste Disposal
Site Near Byron, Illinois.
PB90-130188/CDH See 1463
PB90-132564/CDH
Identification of SARA (Superfund Amend-
ments and Reauthorization Act) Compounds in
Adipose Tissue.
PB90-132564/CDH See 1055
PB90-137316/CDH
Nature and Extent of Ecological Risks at Su-
perfund Sites and RCRA (Resource Conserva-
tion and Recovery Act) Facilities (Executive
Summary Included).
PB90-137316/CDH See 1060
PB90-137324/CDH
Ecological Risk Assessment Methods: A
Review and Evaluation of Past Practices in the
Superfund and RCRA (Resource Conservation
and Recovery Act) Programs (Executive Sum-
mary Included).
PB90-137324/CDH See 1024
PB90-137332/CDH
Ecological Risk Management in the Superfund
and RCRA (Resource Conservation and Re-
covery Act) Programs.
PB90-137332/CDH See 1025
PB90-137340/CDH
Summary of Ecological Risks, Assessment
Methods, and Risk Management Decisions in
Superfund and RCRA (Resource Conservation
and Recovery Act).
PB90-137340/CDH See 1077
PB90-142357/CDH
Health Effects Assessment for Styrene.
PB90-142357/CDH See 1046
PB90-142365/CDH
Health Effects Assessment for 2,4,5-Trichloro-
phenoxy Acetic Acid (2,4,5-T).
PB90-142365/CDH See 1050
PB90-142373/CDH
Updated Health Effects Assessment for Ace-
tone.
PB90-142373/CDH See 1080
NU-33
-------
PB90-142381/CDH
NUMBER INDEX
P890-142361/CDH
Health Effocts Assessment for Benzene.
PB90-142381/CDH See 1035
PB90-142399/CDH
Htwlth Effects Assessment for Cadmium.
Pl9b-142399/CDH See 1036
PB90-142407/CDH
Haalth Effects Assessment for Carbon Tetra-
cMorkta,
PB90-142407/COH See 1037
PB90-142415/CDH
Health Effects Assessment for Chlordane.
PB90-142415/CDH See 1038
• PSHM42423/CDH , ........ „_ n ; ' .
' Hflajih' Effects Assessment'fpr Chloroform.
P|W42423/CDH See 1040
' ' " .....
, „„ ; „ ,,,.
Hciirith Effect* Assessment W DDT.
PB90-142431/COH
See 1041
Health Effects Assessment for Methylene
CWorkJ*,
PSSO-142449/CDH See 1043
PB90.142456/CDH
Health Effocts Assessment for Methyl Ethyl
Ketono.
Pt90-142456/COH See 1042
'
; .............................
Hwtih Effects Assessment for Naphthalene.
PB90-142464/CDH See 1044
PB90-142472/CDH
Health Effocts Assessment for Phenol.
PB80-142472/CDH See 1045
PB90-142480/CDH
Hwith Effects Assessment for Tetrachloroeth-
yfeno.
PBJ.14984d/CDH See 1476
Franwwork for Real-Time Decision-Making:
New, Bedford Harbor PJIpt Dredging Study.
,'',; " PBgOjISOfag/COH , See1S87
,!"';::* PB9Q:i53875/CPH
Maoagament Review of the Superfund Pro-
gram,
PB90-1S3875/CDH See 0101
NU-34
PB90-153883/CDH
Management Review of the Superfund Pro-
gram: Implementation Plan.
PB90-153883/CDH See 0102
PB90-155581/CDH
Risk Assessment Guidance for Superfund.
Volume 1. Human Health Evaluation Manual.
Part A.
PB90-155581 /CDH See 1065
PB90-155599/CDH
Risk Assessment Guidance for Superfund.
Volume 2. Environmental Evaluation Manual.
PB90-155599/CDH See 1072
PB90-159872/CDH
Quality Assurance for the SITE (Superfund In-
novative Technology Evaluation) Program
Demonstrations.
PB90-159872/CDH See 0992
PB90-160326/CDH
National Oil and Hazardous Substances Pollu-
tion Contingency Plan (as Published in the
Federal Register, March 8, 1990).
PB90-160326/CDH See 0145
PB90-168063/CDH
Characterization of Contaminated Soil from the
Montclair/GIen Ridge, New Jersey, Superfund
Sites.
PB90-168063/CDH See 1493
PB90-174855/CDH
SARA (Superfund Amendments and Reauthor-
ization Act) Section 313 Roadmaps Data Base.
User's Manual. Version 2.10.
PB90-174855/CDH See 0304
PB90-182544/CDH
Air/Superfund National Technical Guidance
Series. Superfund Air Pathway Analyses
Review Criteria Checklists.
PB9P-182544/CDH See 1372
PB90-183575/CDH
Determining Soil Response Action Levels
Based on Potential Contaminant Migration to
Ground Water: A Compendium of Examples.
PB90-183575/CDH See 1497
PB90-183799/CDH
Forum on Innovative Hazardous Waste Treat-
ment Technologies: Domestic and Internation-
al. Held in Atlanta, Georgia on June 19-21,
1989. Technical Papers.
PB90-183799/CDH See 1253
PB90-185182/CDH
Filtration of Ground Water Samples for Metals
Analysis.
PB90-185182/CDH See 1454
PB90-186339/CDH
Operations and Research at the U.S. EPA In-
cineration Research Facility: Annual Report for
FY89.
PB90-186339/CDH See 1482
PB90-186396/CDH
User's Guide to Contract Laboratory Program.
PB90-186396/CDH See 0078
PB90-186495/CDH
Technology Evaluation Report: SITE Program.
CF Systems Organics Extraction System, New
Bedford, Massachusetts. Volume 1.
PB90-186495/CDH See 1346
PB90-186503/CDH
Technology Evaluation Report: SITE Program.
CF Systems Organics Extraction System, New
Bedford, Massachusetts. Volume 2.
PB90-186503/CDH See 1347
PB90-187063/CDH
New Approach and Methodologies for Charac-
terizing the Hydrogeologic Properties of
Aquifers.
PB90-187063/CDH See 1470
PB90-187105/CDH
Metals Testing Report: Metal Content of Envi-
ronmental Samples from Region 4.
PB90-187105/CDH See 1282
PB90-191545/CDH
Guidelines for Effective Management of the
Contract Laboratory Program. Part 1. Contract
Award. Part 2. Contract Administration.
PB90-191545/CDH See 0028
PB90-191750/CDH
Technology Evaluation Report: SITE Program
Demonstration Test, Soliditech, Inc., Solidifica-
tion/Stabilization Process. Volume 1.
PB90-191750/CDH See 1570
PB90-191768/CDH
Technology Evaluation Report: SITE Program
Demonstration Test, Soliditech, Inc. Solidifica-
tion/Stabilization Process. Volume 2.
PB90-191768/CDH See 1571
PB90-191966/CDH
Emergency Response Cleanup Services Con-
tracts (ERCS). Users Manual.
PB90-191966/CDH See 0024
PB90-194721/CDH
Superfund Technical Assistance Grants Pro-
gram: Regional Guidance Manual.
PB90-194721 /CDH See 0504
PB90-197310/CDH
Superfund Emergency Response Actions: A
Summary of Federally-Funded Removals.
Volume 1,
PB90-197310/CDH See 0316
PB90-197328/CDH
Superfund Emergency Response Actions: A
Summary of Federally-Funded Removals.
Volume 2.
PB90-197328/CDH See 0317
PB90-198177/CDH
Technology Evaluation Report: SITE Program
Demonstration of the Ultrox International Ultra-
violet Radiation/Oxidation Technology.
PB90-198177/CDH See 1351
PB90-202656/CDH
Innovative Operational Treatment Technol-
ogies for Application to Superfund Site: Nine
Case Studies.
PB90-202656/CDH See 1269
PB90-204140/CDH
Assessment of Technologies for the Remedi-
ation of Radioactively Contaminated Superfund
Sites.
PB90-204140/CDH See 1198
PB90-204157/CDH
Health and Safety Audit Guidelines: SARA Title
I, Section 126.
PB90-204157/CDH See 0916
PB90-204603/CDH
Guidance on Applying the Data Quality Objec-
tives Process for Ambient Air Monitoring
Around Superfund Sites (Stages 1 and 2).
PB90-204603/CDH See 0988
PB90-204611/CDH
Guidance on Applying the Data Quality Objec-
tives Process for Ambient Air Monitoring
Around Superfund Sites (Stage 3).
PB90-2Q4611 /CDH See 0987
-------
NUMBER INDEX
PB90-243270/CDH
PB90-204728/CDH
Development of Electro-Acoustic Soil Decon-
tamination (ESD) Process for In situ Applica-
tions.
PB90-204728/CDH See 1498
PB90-207317/CDH
Air/Superfund National Technical Guidance
Study Series. Comparisons of Air Stripper Sim-
ulations and Field Performance Data.
PB90-207317/CDH See 1376
PB90-213836/CDH
Inorganic Contract Compliance Screening
System (ICCSS) Software for the PC (Version
3/90) User Manual.
PB90-213836/CDH See 0035
PB90-213844/CDH
Organic Contract Compliance Screening
System (OCCSS) Software for the PC (Version
2/90) User Manual.
PB90-213844/CDH See 0048
PB90-214354/CDH
Superfund Emergency Response Actions: A
Summary of Federally Funded Removals.
Volume 3.
PB90-214354/CDH See 0318
PB90-216334/CDH
Description of EPA SITE Demonstration of the
HAZCON Stabilization Process at the Doug-
lassville, Pennsylvania Superfund Site.
PB90-216334/CDH See 15S2
PB90-216516/CDH
Superfund Innovative Technology Evaluation
Program: Progress and Accomplishments,
Fiscal Year 1989. A Third Report to Congress.
PB90-216516/CDH See 1311
PB90-217621/CDH
SITE Demonstration of the CHEMFIX Solidifi-
cation/Stabilization Process at the Portable
Equipment Salvage Company Site.
PB90-217621/CDH See 1559
PB90-221672/CDH
Field Evaluation of the UV/Oxidation Technol-
ogy to Treat Contaminated Groundwater. Pro-
ceedings of the National Conference (10th).
Held in Washington, DC. on November 27-29,
1989.
PB90-221672/CDH See 1453
PB90-226069/CDH
Guidance on EPA Oversight of Remedial De-
signs and Remedial Actions Performed by Po-
tentially Responsible Parties.
PB90-226069/CDH See 1128
PB90-229832/CDH
Achieving Greater Consistency between Sub-
jective and Objective Risks.
PB90-229832/CDH See 1017
PB90-235938/CDH
Communicating with the Public About Hazard-
ous Materials: An Examination of Local Prac-
tice. Risk Communication Series.
PB90-235938/CDH See 0464
PB90-242306/CDH
Rationale for the Assessment of Errors in the
Sampling of Soils.
PB90-242306/CDH See 1526
PB90-242843/CDH
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP National Listing by Site.
PB90-242843/CDH See 0832
PB90-242850/CDH
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP National Listing Alphabetically by Party
Name.
PB90-242850/CDH See 0826
PB90-242868/CDH
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
Frequency by Party Name Report.
PB90-242868/CDH See 0607
PB90-242884/CDH
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Connecticut.
PB90-242884/CDH See 0639
PB90-242892/CDH
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Maine.
PB90-242892/CDH See 0672
PB90-242900/CDH
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Massachusetts.
PB90-242900/CDH See 0678
PB90-242918/CDH
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for New Hampshire.
PB90-242918/CDH See 0702
PB90-242926/CDH
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Rhode Island.
PB90-242926/CDH See 0787
PB90-242934/CDH
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Vermont.
PB90-242934/CDH See 0808
PB90-242959/CDH
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for New Jersey.
PB90-242959/CDH See 0705
PB90-242967/CDH
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for New York.
PB90-242967/CDH See 0711
PB90-242975/CDH
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Puerto Rico.
PB90-242975/CDH See 0735
PB90-242991/CDH
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Delaware.
PB90-242991/CDH See 0642
PB90-243007/CDH
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Maryland.
PB90-243007/CDH See 0675
PB90-243015/CDH
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Pennsylvania.
PB90-243015/CDH See 0732
PB90-243023/CDH
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Site Listing by Site for Virginia.
PB90-243023/CDH See 0848
PB90-243031/CDH
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for West Virginia.
PB90-243031/CDH See 0816
PB90-243056/CDH
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Alabama.
PB90-243056/CDH See 0621
PB90-243064/CDH
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Florida.
PB90-243064/CDH See 0645
PB90-243072/CDH
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Georgia.
PB90-243072/CDH See 0648
PB90-243080/CDH
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Kentucky.
PB90-243080/CDH See 0666
PB90-243098/CDH
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Mississippi.
PB90-243098/CDH See 0687
PB90-243106/CDH
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for North Carolina.
PB90-243106/CDH See 0714
PB90-243114/CDH
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for South Carolina.
PB90-243114/CDH See 0790
PB90-243122/CDH
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Tennessee.
PB90-243122/CDH See 0796
PB90-243148/CDH
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Illinois.
PB90-243148/CDH See 0654
PB90-243155/CDH
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Indiana.
PB90-243155/CDH See 0657
PB90-243163/CDH
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Michigan.
PB90-243163/CDH See 0681
PB90-243171/CDH
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Minnesota.
PB90-243171/CDH See 0684
PB90-243189/CDH
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Ohio.
PB90-243189/CDH See 0723
PB90-243197/CDH
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Wisconsin.
PB90-243197/CDH See 0819
PB90-243213/CDH
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Arkansas.
PB90-243213/CDH See 0630
PB90-243221/CDH
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Louisiana.
PB90-243221/CDH See 0669
PB90-243239/CDH
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for New Mexico.
PB90-243239/CDH See 0708
PB90-243247/CDH
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Oklahoma.
PB90-243247/CDH See 0726
PB90-243254/CDH
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Texas.
PB90-243254/CDH See 0799
PB90-243270/CDH
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Iowa.
PB90-243270/CDH See 0660
NU-35
-------
PBSo-i243288/CDHil"
NUMBER INDEX
PB90-243288/CDH
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Kansas,
PB90-243288/CDH See 0663
PB90-245770/CDH
Using the DNA Alkaline Unwinding Assay to
Detect DNA Damage in Laboratory and Envi-
ronmentally Exposed Cells and Tissues.
.
Sis Enforcement tracking System (SETS):
PRP Ustlng by Site for Missouri.
PS90-243296/CDH See 0690
PB80-243304/CDH
Sita Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Ustlng by Site for Nebraska.
PB90-243304/CDH See 0696
PB90-243320/CDH
Sits Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PHP Usting by Site for Colorado.
PB80-243320/COH See 0636
PB90-243338/CDH
Sla Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Usting by Site for Montana.
P890-243338/COH Sea 0693
PB90-243346/CDH
Stta Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PHP Listing by Stta for North Dakota.
PB90-243348/CDH See 0717
PB90-243353/CDH
Stta Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for South Dakota.
.. PBOT-243353/CpJi ...................... See 0793
PB90-243361/CDH
Sit* Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Usting by Sila for Utah.
PBBO-243361/CDH See 0805
PB9j}-2-243486/COH Sea 0813
NU-36
PB90-247651/CDH
Toxicological Profile for Benzo(b)Fluoranthene.
PB90-247651/CDH See 1360
PB90-249442/CDH
Progress Toward Implementing Superfund.
Rscal Year 1988.
PB90-249442/CDH See 0299
PB90-249533/CDH
Planning for Sufficient Community Relations
(Superfund Management Review: No. 43A).
PB90-249533/CDH See 0108
PB90-249541/CDH
Superfund Analytical Review and Oversight.
PB90-249541/CDH See 0995
PB90-249558/CDH
Decentralization of Superfund Bottle Reposi-
tory Functions.
PB90-249558/CDH See 0985
PB90-249590/CDH
Standard Operating Safety Guides.
PB90-249590/CDH See 0924
PB90-249616/CDH
Discharge of Wastewater from CERCLA Sites
into POTWS.
PB90-249616/CDH See 0421
PB90-249624/CDH
CERCLA Off-Site Policy: Providing Notice to
Facilities.
PB90-249624/CDH See 0415
PB90-249632/CDH
CERCLA Off-Site Policy - Eligibility of Facilities
in Assessment Monitoring.
PB90-249632/CDH See 0414
PB90-249640/CDH
Policy for Superfund Compliance with the
RCRA Land Disposal Restrictions.
PB9p-249640/CDH See 0436
PB90-249657/CDH .............. JI.M ........................ ,
RI/FS Improvements Follow-Up.
PB90-249657/CDH See 1109
PB90-249707/CDH
Guidance on Oversight of PRP Performed RD/
RA.
PB90-249707/CDH See 1130
PB90-249715/CDH
Emergency Response Notification System.
PB90-249715/CDH See 0927
PB90-249723/CDH
Revised Interim Final Guidance on "Indian" in- """
volvement in the Superfund Program.
PB90-249723/CDH See 0484
PB90-249731/CDH
Involvement of Superfund Program Managers
in Superfund Response Agreement Audits.
PB90-249731/CDH See 0099
PB90-249756/CDH
Superfund Innovative Technology Evaluation
Program: Technology Profiles, November
1989.
PB90-249756/CDH See 1317
PB90-249772/CDH .....
Guide for Conducting Treatability Studies
under CERCLA.
PB90-249772/CDH See 1154
PB90-249798/CDH
Use of Office of Research and Development's
Bioremediation Expertise in Superfund Remov-
al Program.
PB.9Q-24.9798/CpH. . . , See 1.016
PB90-252594/CDH
Emerging Technologies: Bio-Recovery Sys-
tems Removal and Recovery of Metal Ions
from Groundwater.
PB90-252594/CDH See 1439
PB90-252602/CDH
Emerging Technologies: Bio-Recovery Sys-
tems Removal and Recovery of Metal Ions
from Groundwater. Appendices.
PB90-252602/CDH See 1440
PB90-253816/CDH
Assessment of Tentatively Identified Com-
pounds in Superfund Samples.
PB90-253816/CDH See 1199
PB90-254988/CDH
Evaluation of Emission Factors for Formalde-
hyde from Certain Wood Processing Oper-
ations. Final Report, May-August 1989.
PB90-254988/CDH See 1410
PB90-255449/CDH
Mobile Incineration: An Analysis of the Indus-
try.
PB90-255449/CDH See 1480
PB90-255662/CDH
Air/Superfund National Technical Guidance
Study Series. Development of Example Proce-
dures for Evaluating the Air Impacts of Soil
Excavation Associated with Superfund Reme-
dial Actions.
PB90-255662/CDH See 1380
PB90-256686/CDH
Some Major Factors Important in Establishing
Land Use Policy for Remediated Superfund
Sites.
PB90-256686/CDH See 0308
PB90-256723/CDH
Ecosystem Effects of Superfund. National Pri-
ority List Sites in Industrial Landscapes: A
Framework for Policy Decisions.
11 pB9p-256"728/CpH SeeOJ35
" "PB 9'6-258302/CDH""""
Accelerated Response at NPL Sites Guidance
(Superfund Management Review: Recommen-
dation No. 22).
PB90-258302/CDH See 0082
PB90-258328/CDH
CERCLIS Data Handling Support Policy State-
ment.
PB90-258328/CDH
See 0013
PB90-258336/CDH
....... Model Performance Standards for Superfund
Project Officers, Deputy Project Officers, and
Work Assignment Managers/Delivery Order
Officers.
PB90-258336/CDH See 0045
PB9b-258344/CDH
OSWER Integrated Health and Safety Policy.
PB90-258344/CDH See 0920
PB90-258369/CDH
Scoper's Notes: An RI/FS Costing Guide.
Bringing in a Quality RI/FS on Time and Within
Budget.
PB90-258369/CDH See 1117
American Combustion Pyretron Destruction
System. Applications Analysis Report.
PB9P-258427/CDH ........ See.,1193,,,
"• 't" I1!:'1 :'•:'' ' '- ' '• ' "*' '••- '!' .....
-------
NUMBER INDEX
PB90-273962/CDH
PB90-258476/CDH
Analysis of Treatability Data for Soil and
Debris: Evaluation of Land Ban Impact on Use
of Superfund Treatment Technologies.
PB90-258476/CDH See 1488
PB90-258484/CDH
ROD Annual Report, FY 1989.
PB90-258484/CDH See 1111
PB90-261835/CDH
Guidance Documents Relating to Landfills and
Contaminants.
PB90-261835/CDH See 1259
PB90-262999/CDH
Remediation Completed: But Is the Ground-
water Meeting the Safe Drinking Water Act Re-
quirements. Haztech International 90. Held in
Houston, Texas on May 8-10, 1990.
PB90-262999/CDH See 1473
PB90-264136/CDH
Management Systems Review of the Super-
fund RI/FS: Opportunities for Streamlining.
PB90-264136/CDH See 1101
PB90-268509/CDH
Forum on Innovative Hazardous Waste Treat-
ment Technologies: Domestic and Internation-
al. Held in Atlanta, Georgia on June 19-21,
1989. Abstract Proceedings.
PB90-268509/CDH See 1252
PB90-268517/CDH
Superfund Ground Water Issue. Contaminant
Transport in Fractured Media: Models for Deci-
sion Makers.
PB90-268517/CDH See 1477
PB90-269069/CDH
Technology Evaluation Report: International
Waste Technologies/Geo-Con In situ Stabiliza-
tion/Solidification. Volume 3. Update Report.
PB90-269069/CDH See 1567
PB90-269077/CDH
Technology Evaluation Report: International
Waste Technologies/Geo-Con In situ Stabiliza-
tion/Solidification. Volume 4. Update Report.
PB90-269077/CDH See 1568
PB90-269085/CDH
International Waste Technologies/Geo-Con In
situ Stabilization/Solidification: Applications
Analysis Report.
PB90-269085/CDH See 1557
PB90-270588/CDH
Air/Superfund National Technical Guidance
Study Series. Volume 2. Estimation of Baseline
Air Emissions at Superfund Sites (Revised).
PB90-270588/CDH See 1392
PB90-272501/CDH
OSWER Comparative Risk Project. Executive
Summary and Overview.
PB90-272501/CDH See 1062
PB90-272535/CDH
CERCLA Compliance with Other Laws Manual.
Part 1. Interim Final.
PB90-272535/CDH See 0409
PB90-272543/CDH
CERCLA Compliance with Other Laws Manual:
CERCLA Compliance with State Requirements.
PB90-272543/CDH See 0405
PB90-272550/CDH
CERCLA Compliance with Other Laws Manual:
Summary and Part 2. CAA, TSCA, and Other
Statutes.
PB90-272550/CDH See 0411
PB90-272568/CDH
Guidelines for Effective Management of the
Contract Laboratory Program.
PB90-272568/CDH See 0027
PB90-272576/CDH
Guide on Remedial Actions for Contaminated
Ground Water.
PB90-272576/CDH See 1461
PB90-272584/CDH
Mandatory Training Requirements for QCSs
and RPMs.
PB90-272584/CDH See 0104
PB90-272592/CDH
Mandatory Community Relations Training. Su-
perfund Management Review Implementation
Product (Recommendation: No. 43.P(i)).
PB90-272592/CDH See 0103
PB90-272618/CDH
Notification of Out-of-State Shipments of Su-
perfund Site Wastes.
PB90-272618/CDH See 0429
PB90-272634/CDH
Data Quality Objectives for Remedial Re-
sponse Activities: Development Process. Ex-
ample Scenario: RI/FS Activities at a Site with
Contaminated Soils and Ground Water.
PB90-272634/CDH See 0980
PB90-272642/CDH
RI/FS Improvements.
PB90-272642/CDH See 1108
PB90-272659/CDH
Advancing the Use of Treatment Technologies
for Superfund Remedies.
PB90-272659/CDH See 1191
PB90-272667/CDH
Control of Air Emissions from Superfund Air
Strippers at Superfund Groundwater Sites.
PB90-272667/CDH See 1399
PB90-272675/CDH
Feasibility Study: Detailed Analysis of Remedi-
al Action Alternatives.
PB90-272675/CDH See 1088
PB90-272683/CDH
Expediting Remedial Construction.
PB90-272683/CDH See 1127
PB90-272691/CDH ,
Removal Cost Management System: Version
3.2.
PB90-272691/CDH See 1009
PB90-272709/CDH
Guidelines for the Cleanup of Clandestine Drug
Laboratories.
PB90-272709/CDH See 1007
PB90-272717/CDH
Audits and the Superfund Program Manager.
PB90-272717/CDH See 0086
PB90-272725/CDH
Status of State Involvement in the Superfund
Program, FY 80 to FY 89.
PB90-272725/CDH See 0114
PB90-272733/CDH
Analysis of State Superfund Programs: 50-
State Study.
PB90-272733/CDH See 0447
PB90-273731/CDH
Superfund Responsiveness Summaries (Super-
fund Management Review: Recommendation
Number 43E).
PB90-273731/CDH See 0125
PB90-273749/CDH
Community Relations: Use of Senior Environ-
mental Employees in Superfund (Superfund
Management Review: Recommendation
43.K.L).
PB90-273749/CDH See 0088
PB90-273756/CDH
Role of Community Interviews in the Develop-
ment of a Community Relations Program for
Remedial Response.
PB90-273756/CDH See 0485
PB90-273764/CDH
Proposed Method to Evaluate the Effective-
ness of Community Involvement in Superfund
(Superfund Management Review: Recommen-
dation Number 43.A).
PB90-273764/CDH See 0109
PB90-273772/CDH
Superfund Technical Assistance Grants.
PB90-273772/CDH See 0502
PB90-273780/CDH
ARARs Q's and A's.
PB90-273780/CDH See 0398
PB90-273798/CDH
CERCLA Compliance with Other Laws Manual:
Overview of ARARs - Focus on ARAR Waiv-
ers.
PB90-273798/CDH See 0408
PB90-273806/CDH
CERCLA Compliance with Other Laws Manual:
CERCLA Compliance with the CWA and
SDWA.
PB90-273806/CDH See 0406
PB90-273814/CDH
ARAR's Q's and A's. Compliance with the Tox-
icity Characteristics Rule. Part 1.
PB90-273814/CDH See 0396
PB90-273822/CDH
Approval of Long Term Contracting Strategy
for Superfund (Superfund Management
Review: Recommendation E.2).
PB90-273822/CDH See 0018
PB90-273830/CDH
Risk Assessment Guidance for Superfund.
Volume 1. Human Health Evaluation Manual.
Part A, April 1990.
PB90-273830/CDH See 1066
PB90-273855/CDH
Guide to Developing Superfund Proposed
Plans.
PB90-273855/CDH See 1099
PB90-273863/CDH
Guide to Selecting Superfund Remedial Ac-
tions.
PB90-273863/CDH See 1100
PB90-273871/CDH
Guidance on Expediting Remedial Design and
Remedial Action.
PB90-273871/CDH See 1129
PB90-273889/CDH
USAGE Preplaced and Rapid Response Con-
tracts.
PB90-273889/CDH See 1139
PB90-273897/CDH
EPA/USACE Payment Process: Direct Cite/
Revised Reimbursement Methods.
PB90-273897/CDH . See 1126
PB90-273954/CDH
Political Subdivision Involvement in Superfund.
PB90-273954/CDH See 0479
PB90-273962/CDH
Treatability Studies Contractor Work Assign-
ments.
PB90-273962/CDH See 0076
NU-37
-------
PB90-273970/CDH
PBSO-273970/CDH
Testability Studies Under CERCLA: An Over-
view.
,;,; ..... ;; ,. see 117?
Technology Evaluation Report CHEMFIX Tech-
notefltes, Inc., SoWiffcatton/StabiHzation Proc-
«s», Ctackamas. Oregon. Volume 2.
PB80-274127/CDH See 1339
P890-274184/CDH
looovatlva technology: SoM Washing.
PB90-274184/CDH See 1515
........................................
Innovative Technology: In-situ Vitrification.
PB80-274192/CDH See 1514
PB90-274200/CDH
Inoovativtt f echnotogy: Slurry-Phase Biodegra-
djfori,' ., " ; .........................
P880-274200/CDH See 1271
PB90-274218/CDH
Innovative Technology: BEST Solvent Extrac-
tion Process.
PBDO-274218/CDH See 1270
P890-274226/COH
Innovative Technology: Glyoolate Dehalogena-
tkm.
; . ^ . ', " See 1513
[[[
CERCLA CfinipliarKja with Other Laws Manual:
Gokte to Manual.
PB9b-274242/ODH See 0407
PB9g-274259/CDH / / ^ ".'
CgFfCLA CormJllanca with Other Laws Manual:
BalA ARABS-Focus on Closure Require-
rrHnJs,, [[[
PB§0-274259/CDH See 0410
™ ' ''"''
, .
ABARS Q's and A's: Compiance with Federal
Water Quality Criteria.
PB90.274267/CDH See 0399
PB90-274275/CDH
Long-Term Contracting Strategy for Superfund.
PS90-274275/CDH See 0042
Asbestos Assessment Manual.
Superfund Method for the Determination of As-
bestos In Ambient Air. Part 1 . Method.
PB90-274283/COH See 1027
PB90-274291/CDH
Environmental Asbestos Assessment Manual.
Suportund Method for the Determination of As-
bttta In Ambtont Afr. Part 2. Technical Back-
ground Document.
PB90-274291/CDH See 1028
PB9S274317/CDH
intwlm RCRA/CERCLA Guidance on Non-
Contiguous Sites and On-Site Management on
Wasta and Treatment Residue.
PB90-274317/CDH See 0427
P890-274325/CDH
Suparfund LDR Guide No. 1: Overview of
RCRA Land DJsposal Restrictions (LDRs).
PBao.274325/CDH See 04/40
PB8S274333/CDH
Su|3flrfund LDR Guide No^ 2: Complying with
thj ..... Calfprnja List ResblctiODS under Land Dis-
RestricHons (LDRs).
t ......... , , 5,6,60441
Suptrfund LDR Guide No. 3: Treatment Stand-
ards and Minimum Technology Requirements
toxior Land Disposal Restrictions (LDRS).
P890-274341/CDH See 0442
NUMBER INDEX
PB90-274358/CDH
Superfund LDR Guide No. 4: Complying with
the Hammer Restrictions under Land Disposal
Restrictions (LDRs).
PB90-274358/CDH See 0443
PB90-274366/CDH
Superfund LDR Guide No. 5: Determining
When Land Disposal Restrictions (LDRs) Are
'Applicable' to CERCLA Response Actions.
PB9Q-274366/CDH See 0444
PB90-274374/CDH
Guide to Delisting of RCRA Wastes for Super-
fund Remedial Responses.
PB90-274374/CDH See 0422
PB90-274382/CDH
Use of Removal Approaches to Speed Up Re-
medial Action Projects.
PB90-274382/CDH See 1140
PB90-274390/CDH
Getting Ready: Scoping the RI/FS.
PB90-274390/CDH See 1092
PB90-274408/CDH
Remedial Investigation: Site Characterization
and Treatability Studies.
PB90-274408/CDH See 1106
PB90-274416/CDH
Feasibility Study: Development and Screening
of Remedial Action Alternatives.
PB90-274416/CDH
PB90-274424/CDH
Streamlining the RI/FS for CERCLA Municipal
Landfill Sites.
PB90-274424/CDH See 1118
PB90-274432/CDH
Guide on Remedial Actions at Superfund Sites
with PGB Cgntam|nation,
PB90-274432/CDH See 1262
PB90-274440/CDH
Evaluation of Ground-Water Extraction Reme-
dies. Volume 2. Case Studies 1-19.
PB90-274440/CDH See 1446
PB90-274457/CDH
Evaluation of Ground-Water Extraction Reme-
dies. Volume 3. General Site Data: Data Base
Reports.
PB90-274457/CDH See 1447
PB90-274465/CDH
Final Guidance on Implementation of the 'Con-
sistency' Exemption to the Statutory Limits on
Removal Actions.
PB90-274465/CDH See 1004
PB90-274473/CDH
Superfund Removal Procedures: Action Memo-
randum Guidance.
PB90-274473/CDH See 1012
PB90-274481/CDH
Quality Assurance/Quality Control Guidance
for Removal Activities: Sampling QA/QC Plan
and Data Validation Procedures.
PB90-274481/CDH See 0993
PB90-274499/CDH
Criminal Investigations and the Superfund Pro-
gram.
PB90-274499/CDH See 0469
PB90-274507/CDH
CERCLA Waste Capacity Assurance.
PB90-274567/CbH See 0131
PB90-274515/CDH
ARCS Construction Contract Modification Pro-
cedures.
PB90-274515/CDH See 0020
PB90-274523/CDH
Hazmat Team Planning Guidance.
PB90-274523/CDH See 0915
PB90-274531/CDH
CERCLA Site Discharges to POTWs: Guidance
Manual.
PB90-274531/CDH See 1576
PB90-502618/CDH
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)
(Region 1) (for Microcomputers).
PB90-502618/CDH See 0850
PB90-502626/CDH
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)
(Region 2) (for Microcomputers).
PB90-502626/CDH See 0852
PB90-502634/CDH
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)
(Region 3) (for Microcomputers).
PB90-502634/CDH See 0854
PB90-502642/CDH
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)
(Region 4) (for Microcomputers).
PB90-502642/CDH See 0856
PB90-502659/CDH
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)
(Region 5) (for Microcomputers).
PB90-502659/CDH See 0858
See 1089 PB90-502667/CDH
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)
(Region 6) (for Microcomputers).
PB90-502667/CDH See 0860
PB90-502675/CDH
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)
(Region 7) (for Microcomputers).
PB90-502675/CDH See 0862
PB9u:562683/CbH
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)
(Region 8) (for Microcomputers).
PB90-502683/CDH See 0864
PB90-502691/CDH
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)
(Region 9) (for Microcomputers).
PB90-502691/CDH See 0866
PB90-502709/CDH
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)
(Region 10) (for Microcomputers).
PB90-502709/CDH See 0868
PB90-591310/CDH
CERCLIS (Comprehensive Environmental Re-
sponse, Compensation, and Liability Informa-
tion System) Site Location Extract.
PB90-591310/CDH See 0012
PB90-591690/CDH
Organic Contract Compliance Screening
System (OCCSS) Software (for Microcomput-
ers).
PB90-591690/CDH See 0047
PB90-591700/CDH
Inorganic Contract Compliance Screening
System (ICCSS) Software (for Microcomput-
ers).
PB90-591700/CDH See 0034
PB90-591780/CDH
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)
(National) (for Microcomputers).
PB90-591780/CDH See 0613
PB90-591790/CDH
-------
NUMBER INDEX
PB91-131037/CDH
PB90-780115/CDH
Enforcement Project Management Handbook.
PB90-780115/CDH See 0531
PB90-921100/CDH
Health Effects Assessment Summary Tables
Fourth Quarter FY 1989.
PB90-921100/GDH See 1054
PB91-100800/CDH
Revised Hazard Ranking System (HRS): Final
Rule.
PB91-100800/CDH See 0380
PB91-102129/CDH
Air/Superfund National Technical Guidance
Study Series. Contingency Plans at Superfund
Sites Using Air Monitoring.
PB91-102129/CDH See 1378
PB91-113845/CDH
Applications Analysis Report: SITE Program,
CF Systems Organics Extraction System, New
Bedford, Massachusetts.
PB91 -113845/CDH See 1196
PB91-125674/CDH
Technology Transfer Needs Assessment,
1990.
PB91-125674/CDH See 1354
PB91-125997/CDH
Air/Superfund National Technical Guidance
Study Series. Air Stripper Design Manual.
PB91-125997/CDH See 1374
PB91-127696/CDH
Technology Evaluation Report: Chemfix Tech-
nologies, Inc. Solidification/Stabilization Proc-
ess, Clackamas, Oregon. Volume 1.
PB91-127696/CDH See 1566
PB91-129189/CDH
Quantifying Effects in Ecological Site Assess-
ments: Biological and Statistical Consider-
ations.
PB91-129189/CDH See 1063
PB91-129759/CDH
Ultrox International Ultraviolet Radiation/Oxida-
tion Technology: Applications Analysis Report.
PB91-129759/CDH See 1364
PB91-129817/CDH
Soliditech, Inc. Solidification/Stabilization Proc-
ess: Applications Analysis Report.
PB91-129817/CDH See 1562
PB91-130492/CDH
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP National Listing Alphabetically by Party
Name.
PB91 -130492/CDH See 0827
PB91-130518/CDH
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
Frequency by Party Name Report.
PB91-130518/CDH See 0608
PB91-130534/CDH
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Connecticut.
PB91-130534/CDH See 0640
PB91-130542/CDH
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Maine.
PB91-130542/CDH See 0673
PB91-130559/CDH
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Massachusetts.
PB91-130559/CDH See 0679
PB91-130567/CDH
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for New Hampshire.
PB91-130567/CDH See 0703
PB91-130575/CDH
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Rhode Island.
PB91-130575/CDH See 0788
PB91-130583/CDH
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Vermont.
PB91-130583/CDH See 0809
PB91-130609/CDH
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for New Jersey.
PB91-130609/CDH See 0706
PB91-130617/CDH
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for New York.
PB91 -130617/CDH See 0712
PB91-130625/CDH
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Puerto Rico.
PB91 -130625/CDH See 0736
PB91-130641/CDH
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Delaware.
PB91 -130641 /CDH See 0643
PB91-130658/CDH
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Maryland.
PB91-130658/CDH See 0676
PB91-130666/CDH
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Pennsylvania.
PB91-130666/CDH See 0733
PB91-130674/CDH
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Virginia.
PB91-130674/CDH See 0811
PB91-130682/CDH
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for West Virginia.
PB91-130682/CDH See 0817
PB91-130708/CDH
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Alabama.
PB91-130708/CDH See 0622
PB91-130716/CDH
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Georgia.
PB91 -130716/CDH See 0649
PB91-130724/CDH
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Kentucky.
PB91-130724/CDH See 0667
PB91-130732/CDH
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Mississippi.
PB91-130732/CDH See 0688
PB91-130740/CDH
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for North Carolina.
PB91 -130740/CDH See 0715
PB91-130757/CDH
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for South Carolina.
PB91-130757/CDH See 0791
PB91-130765/CDH
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Tennessee.
PB91 -130765/CDH See 0797
PB91-130781/CDH
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Illinois.
PB91-130781/CDH See 0655
PB91-130799/CDH
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Indiana.
PB91-130799/CDH See 0658
PB91-130807/CDH
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Michigan.
PB91-130807/CDH See 0682
PB91-130815/CDH
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Minnesota.
PB91 -130815/CDH See 0685
PB91-130823/CDH
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Ohio.
PB91-130823/CDH See 0724
PB91-130831/CDH
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Wisconsin.
PB91-130831/CDH See 0820
PB91-130906/CDH
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Arkansas.
PB91 -130906/CDH See 0631
PB91-130914/CDH
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Louisiana.
PB91-130914/CDH See 0670
PB91-130922/CDH
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for New Mexico.
PB91 -130922/CDH See 0709
PB91-130930/CDH
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Oklahoma.
PB91-130930/CDH See 0727
PB91-130948/CDH
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Texas.
PB91-130948/CDH See 0800
PB91-130963/CDH
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Iowa.
PB91-130963/CDH See 0661
PB91-130971/CDH
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Kansas.
PB91-130971/CDH See 0664
PB91-130989/CDH
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Missouri.
PB91-130989/CDH See 0691
PB91-130997/CDH
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Nebraska.
PB91-130997/CDH See 0697
PB91-131011/CDH
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Colorado.
PB91-131011/CDH See 0637
PB91-131029/CDH
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Montana.
PB91-131029/CDH See 0694
PB91-131037/CDH
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for North Dakota.
PB91-131037/CDH See 0718
NU-39
-------
P?9t-131045/CDH
NUMBER INDEX
ism
S4i
PB91-131045/CPH
S|« Enfproement Irackftifl System (SETS):
Pig Listing by Site for South Dakota.
Pa91-131045/COH Sea 0794
pBii-131052/CDH
Sfto Enforesmsnt Tracking System (SETS):
PHP Ustlng by Site for Utah.
PB91-131052/CDH See 0806
PB9M31060/CDH
Stt« Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by SIta for Wyoming.
PB91-131060/CDH See 0823
PB91-131086/CDH
Stta Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Sfta for American Samoa.
PB91-131088/CDH See 0625
PB91-131094/CDH
S«s Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PfiP Listing by Site for Arizona.
PB0M31094/CDH See 0628
PB91-131102/CDH
pHs Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Usting by Stta for California.
PB9M31102/CDH See 0634
PB41-131110/CDH
Sfto Enforcoment Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Ustlng by Stta for Nevada,
PB91-131110/CDH See 0700
PB9M31128/CDH
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Northern Marianas.
PB91-131128/COH See 0721
PB91-131136/CDH
Stt* Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Trust Territories.
P9l-i31136/CDH SeeOBOS
Sflt ' EnfCfoonTent Bracking System "(SETS):
PQP Listing by Site for Idaho.
P891-131151/COH Sea 0652
PB91-131169/CDH
SKe Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Oregon.
PS91-131169/COH See 0730
PB9M31177/CDH
S|* Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Washington.
PB91-131177/CDH See 0814
PB91-131219/CDH
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Ustlng by Site for Florida.
PB91-131219/CDH See 0646
PB91-131326/CDH
Hazardous Waste Superfund Collection: Data-
base Thesaurus,.
.....
PB9I-131334/CDH "I "I . ,! ..... ,"
8j» Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP National Listing by Site.
PB91-131334/CDH ...... .......................... See 0833
PB91-133249/CDH
Ground Water Sampling for Metals Analyses.
Suporfund Ground Water Issue.
PB91-133249/CDH See 1459
PB91-133256/CDH
Facilitated Transport. Series of Issue Papers
(3rd).
PB91-133258/CDH See 1451
NU-40
PB91-138818/CDH
Revision of CERCLA Civil Judicial Settlement
Authorities under Delegations 14-13-B and 14-
14:E.
PB91-138818/CDH See 0602
PB91-138826/CDH
Waiver of Concurrence on De Minimis Genera-
tor Settlements.
PB91-138826/CDH See 0892
PB91-138834/CDH
Redelegation of Civil Judicial Settlement Au-
thorities under Delegation 14-13-B and 14-14-
E.
PB91 -138834/CDH See 0593
PB91-138842/CDH
Superfund Enforcement Strategy and Imple-
mentation Plan.
PB91-138842/CDH See 0883
PB91-1388S9/CDH
Policy for Enforcement Actions against Trans-
porters under CERCLA.
PB91-138859/CDH See 0584
PB91-138867/CDH
Entry and Continued Access under CERCLA.
PB91-138867/CDH See 0534
PB91-138875/CDH
Regional Oversight of Federal Facility Clean-
ups under CERCLA.
PB91-138875/CDH See 0900
PB91-138883/CDH
Reporting and Exchange of Information on
State Enforcement Actions at National Prior-
ities List Sites.
PB91-138883/CDH See 0483
PB91-138891/CDH
Funding of State Enforcement Related Activi-
ties.
PB91-138891/CDH See 0474
PB91-138909/CDH
Authority to Use CERCLA to Provide Enforce-
ment Funding Assistance to States.
PB91-1389P9/CDH See 0450
PB91-138917/CDH
Interim Final Guidance Package on Funding
CERCLA State Enforcement Actions at NPL
Sites.
PB91-138917/CDH See 0477
PB91-138925/CDH
Supporting State Attorneys General CERCLA
Remedial and Enforcement Activities at NPL
Sites.
PB91-138925/CDH See 0506
PB91-138933/CDH
Counting State-Lead Enforcement NPL Sites
Toward the CERCLA Section 116(e) Remedial
Action Start Mandate.
PB91-138933/CDH See 0468
PB91-138941/CDH
Cost Recovery Referrals.
PB91 -138941 /CDH See 0525
PB91-138958/CDH
Procedures for Documenting Costs for
CERCLA Section 107 Actions.
PB91-138958/CDH See 0590
PB91-138966/CDH
Cost Recovery Actions under CERCLA.
PB91-138966/CDH See 0524
PB91-138974/CDH
Coordination of EPA and State Actions in Cost
Recovery.
PB91-138974/CDH See 0522
PB91-138982/CDH
Cost Recovery Actions/Statute of Limitations.
PB91 -138982/CDH See 0523
PB91-138990/CDH
Policy on Recovering Indirect Cost in CERCLA
Section 107 Cost Recovery Actions.
PB91-138990/CDH See 0585
PB91-13900S/CDH
Small Cost Recovery Referrals.
PB91-139006/CDH See 0869
PB91-139014/CDH
Guidance Regarding CERCLA Enforcement
against Bankrupt Parties.
PB91 -139014/CDH See 0556
PB91-139022/CDH
Revised Hazardous Waste Bankruptcy Guid-
ance.
PB91 -139022/CDH See 0598
PB91-139030/CDH
Liability of Corporate Shareholders and Suc-
cessor Corporations for Abandoned Sites
Under the Comprehensive Environmental Re-
sponse, Compensation and Liability Act.
PB91-139030/CDH See 0570
PB91-139048/CDH
Guidance on Documenting Decisions Not to
Take Cost Recovery Actions.
PB91-139048/CDH See 0549
PB91-139055/CDH
Guidance on Federal Superfund Liens.
PB91-139055/CDH See 0551
PB91-139063/CDH
Superfund Cost Recovery Strategy.
PB91-139063/CDH See 0882
PB91-139089/CDH
Guidance on CERCLA 106(a) Unilateral Admin-
istrative Orders for Remedial Designs and Re-
medial Actions.
PB91 -139089/CDH See 0548
PB91-139097/CDH
Model Unilateral Order for Remedial Design
and Remedial Action.
PB91 -139097/CDH See 0580
PB91-139105/CDH
Issuance of Administrative Orders for Immedi-
ate Removal Actions.
PB91-139105/CDH See 0567
PB91-139113/CDH
Consent Orders and the Reimbursement Provi-
sion Under Section 106(b) of CERCLA.
PB91 -139113/CDH See 0520
PB91-139121/CDH
Final Guidance on Administrative Records for
Selecting CERCLA Response Actions.
PB91 -139121 /CDH See 0473
PB91-139147/CDH
Releasing Identities of Potentially Responsible
Parties in Response to FOIA Requests.
PB91-139147/CDH See 0594
PB91-139162/CDH
PRP Search Supplemental Guidance for Sites
in the Superfund Remedial Program.
PB91 -139162/CDH See 0592
PB91-139170/CDH
Transmittal of Guidance on Use and Enforce-
ment of CERCLA Information Requests and
Administrative Subpoenas.
PB91-139170/CDH See 0887
111 111
Illll'i
-------
NUMBER INDEX
PB91-139808/CDH
PB91-139188/CDH
Procedural Guidance on Treatment of Insurers
under CERCLA.
PB91-139188/CDH See 0589
PB91-139196/CDH
Interim Guidance on Settlements with De Mini-
mis Waste Contributors under Section 122(g)
of SARA.
PB91-139196/CDH See 0562
PB91-139204/CDH
Interim Model CERCLA Section 122(g) (4) De
Minimis Waste Contributor Consent Decree
and Administrative Order on Consent.
PB91 -139204/CDH See 0565
PB91-139212/CDH
Methodologies for Implementation of CERCLA
Section 122(g) (1) (A) De Minimis Waste Con-
tributor Settlements Proposals and Agree-
ments.
PB91 -139212/CDH See 0572
PB91-139220/CDH
Covenants Not to Sue under SARA.
PB91-139220/CDH See 0526
PB91-139238/CDH
Evaluating Mixed Funding Settlements under
CERCLA.
PB91-139238/CDH See 0537
PB91-139246/CDH
Interim Policy on Mixed Funding Settlements
Involving the Preauthorization of States or Po-
litical Subdivisions.
PB91-139246/CDH See 0566
PB91-139253/CDH
Interim Guidance on Notice Letters, Negotia-
tions, and Information Exchange.
PB91-139253/CDH . See 0560
PB91-139261/CDH
Waiver of Headquarters Approval for Issuance
of RD/RA Special Notice Letters at the Time
of ROD Signature from OERR and OWPE.
PB91 -139261 /CDH See 0893
PB91-139279/CDH
Model Notice Letters.
PB91 -139279/CDH See 0577
PB91-139287/CDH
Revised Procedures for Implementing Off-Site
Response Actions.
PB91-139287/CDH See 0601
PB91-139295/CDH
Off-Site Policy: RFA or Equivalent Investigation
Requirement at RCRA Treatment and Storage
Facilities.
PB91-139295/CDH See 0431
PB91-139311/CDH
Municipal Settlements.
PB91-139311/CDH See 0583
PB91-139329/CDH
Interim CERCLA Settlement Policy.
PB91-139329/CDH See 0559
PB91-139337/CDH
Interim Guidance on Potentially Responsible
Party Participation in Remedial Investigations
and Feasibility Studies.
PB91-139337/CDH See 0561
PB91-139345/CDH
Guidance on Drafting Consent Decrees in Haz-
ardous Waste Cases.
PB91 -139345/CDH See 0550
PB91-139352/CDH
Revisions to the Interim Guidance on PRP Par-
ticipation in Remedial Investigations and Feasi-
bility Studies.
PB91-139352/CDH See 0603
PB91-139360/CDH
Guidance of the Use of Stipulated Penalties in
Hazardous Waste Consent Decrees.
PB91-139360/CDH See 0544
PB91-139378/CDH
Administrative Order on Consent for Remedial
Investigations/Feasibility Study.
PB91 -139378/CDH See 0510
PB91-139386/CDH
Interim Guidance: Streamlining the CERCLA
Settlement Decision Process.
PB91-139386/CDH See 0563
PB91-139394/CDH
Initiation of PRP-Financed Remedial Design in
Advance of Consent Decree Entry (Final).
PB91-139394/CDH See 0557
PB91-139402/CDH
EPA Interim Guidance on Indemnification of
Superfund Response Action Contractors Under
Section 119 of SARA.
PB91-139402/CDH See 0536
PB91-139410/CDH
Guidance on Premium Payments in CERCLA
Settlements.
PB91 -139410/CDH See 0553
PB91-139428/CDH
Guidance on CERCLA Section 106 Judicial Ac-
tions.
PB91 -139428/CDH See 0546
PB91-139436/CDH
Model Statement of Work for a Remedial In-
vestigation and Feasibility Study Conducted by
Potentially Responsible Parties.
PB91 -139436/CDH See 0578
PB91-139444/CDH
Guidance on Landowner Liability under Section
107(a)(1) of CERCLA, De Minimis Settlements
under Section 122{g)(1)(B) of CERCLA, and
Settlements with Prospective Purchasers of
Contaminated Property.
PB91-139444/CDH See 0552
PB91-139451/CDH
Model Litigation Report for CERCLA Sections
106 and 107 and RCRA Section 7003.
PB91 -139451 /CDH See 0576
PB91-139469/CDH
Releasing Information to Potentially Responsi-
ble Parties at CERCLA Sites.
PB91-139469/CDH See 0595
PB91-139477/CDH
Comparative Analysis of Remedies Selected in
the Superfund Program during FY 87, FY 88
and FY 89.
PB91-139477/CDH See 0519
PB91-139485/CDH
Submittal of Ten-Point Settlement Analyses for
CERCLA Consent Decrees.
PB91-139485/CDH See 0871
PB91-139493/CDH
Performance of Risk Assessments in Remedial
Investigation/Feasibility Studies (RI/FSs) Con-
ducted by Potentially Responsible Parties
(PRPs).
PB91-139493/CDH See 1102
PB91-139519/CDH
Community Relations during Enforcement Ac-
tivities and Development of the Administrative
Record.
PB91 -139519/CDH See 0465
PB91-139527/CDH
CERCLA Community Relations Mailing Lists.
PB91-139527/CDH See 0451
PB91-139543/CDH
Preparation of Hazardous Waste Referrals.
PB91-139543/CDH See 0588
PB91-139550/CDH
Scope of the CERCLA Petroleum Exclusion
under Sections 101(14) and 104(a)(2).
PB91-139550/CDH See 0605
PB91-139600/CDH
Site Classification Changes from Enforcement
to Fund Lead.
PB91-139600/CDH See 0606
PB91-139642/CDH
Guidance on Applicability of EPA Order 3500.1
to CERCLA Staff.
PB91-139642/CDH See 0545
PB91-139659/CDH
CERCLA Implementation of the Training Re-
quirements of EPA Order 3500.1. Inspector
Training.
PB91-139659/CDH See 0518
PB91-139667/CDH
Revised EPA Guidance on Parallel Proceed-
ings.
PB91-139667/CDH See 0597
PB91-139675/CDH
Endangerment Assessment Guidance.
PB91-139675/CDH See 0527
PB91-139683/CDH
Endangerment Assessment Handbook.
PB91-139683/CDH See 0529
PB91-139709/CDH
Interim Guidance for Soil Ingestion Rates.
PB91-139709/CDH See 1057
PB91-139717/CDH
Integrated Timeline for Superfund Site Man-
agement (SMR 5,15).
PB91 -139717/CDH See 0098
PB91-139733/CDH
Use of CERCLA Section 106 Unilateral En-
forcement for Remedial Design and Remedial
Action: Strategy for Fiscal Year 1990.
PB91-139733/CDH See 0891
PB91-139741/CDH
Roles and Responsibilities of Deputy Project
Officers and Work Assignment Managers
under the Technical Enforcement Support
(TES) Contracts.
PB91-139741/CDH See 0069
PB91-139758/CDH
Roles and Responsibilities of Regional Project
Officers and Headquarters Zone Project Offi-
cers for Management of TES (TES 5) Con-
tracts.
PB91 -139758/CDH See 0604
PB91-139766/CDH
Expanded Civil Judicial Referral Procedures.
PB91-139766/CDH See 0539
PB91-139774/CDH
Procedures for Transmittal of CERCLA and
RCRA Civil Judicial Enforcement Case Pack-
ages to Headquarters.
PB91-139774/CDH See 0591
PB91-139790/CDH
Expansion of Direct Referral of Cases to the
Department of Justice.
PB91-139790/CDH See 0540
PB91-139808/CDH
Multi-Media Settlements of Enforcement
Claims.
PB91-139808/CDH See 0581
NU-41
-------
PB91-139980/CDH
NUMBER INDEX
PB91.139980/CDH
Guidance tor Environmental Priorities initiative
(EP|J FacilfSes in the Superfund Pro-Remedial
Program.
• P891-139880/CDH see 0341
PB9J-I4Q1J1/PPH ;',"",;' ' ~~ " ........... ...... ^'., '"„""
Istuance o( Administrative Orders Under Sec-
ftffl 3Q13 of tha 'Resource Conservation and
Recovery Act.
PB91-14011VCDH See 0568
PB91-140129/CDH
Issuance of Final Revised Guidance on the
Usa and Issuance of Administrative Orders
Umtor Section 7003 of the Resource Conser-
vation and Recovery Act (RCRA).
P881-140129/CDH See 0569
P80J-140202/CDH .............................................
Tiwmlttaiof the .FlnaJ Waste Oil Interim En-
(ofcomont Guidance Document.
PB9,t-140202/CDH See 0889
PB91-144675/COH
Evaluation of Exposure Markers.
P89f-144875/CbH
PB91-145110/CDH
SITE Demonstration of the CF Systems Organ-
fes Extraction System.
PS91-145110/CDH See 1301
PB91-145433/CDH
Physical/Chemical Treatment of Hazardous
Waste Sites: Speaker Slide Copies and Sup-
porting Information.
P89M45433/COH See 1287
See 1246
,
Guidance on Remedial Actions for Superfund
Sites with PCS Contamination.
P691-145466/CDH See
ii!"1 •• ' fi " '»' " »"°
f : Abstwcl Proceedings: Forum on Innovative
Hazardous Waste Treatment Technologies;
pomjrte and International (2nd). Held in
PhfteWphia, Pennsylvania on May 15-17,
ism
P89H4S649/CRH See 1186
i PB91-182479/CDH
RfflMJlts from the Stabilization Technologies
Evaluated by the Site Program. New England
Environmental Expo 90.
P891.162479/CDH See 1558
PB91-162727/CPH ,
Future of Expert Systems in the Environmental
Protection Agency.
PB9M63727/CDH See 1257
PB91-182784/CDH
Factors Affecting the Applicability of Plasma
Hi !' *!• f Systems to tha Cleanup of Superfund Sites,
, ; .;; ,.,. PB§J-J627e4/COH See 1250
PB91-163741/CDH
Field Demonstration of the UV/OxIdation
Technology to Treat Ground Water Contami-
nated wfthVOCs.
P891-163741/CDH See 1452
PB91-J63758/CDH
Control Technology: Estimating Innovative
Technology Costs for the SITE Program.
PB9M63758/CDH See 1222
PB9M67593/CDH
Reporting Requirements for Continuous Re-
te»»s o( Hazardous Substances: A Guide for
FaoSWes and Vessels on Compliance.
PB91-T67593/COH See 1150
NU-42
PB91-168450/CDH
Continuous Release-Emergency Response No-
tification System and Priority Assessment
Model: User's Manual for EPA Regions.
PB91-16845p/CpH 3861144
PB91-168468/CDH
Continuous Release-Emergency Response No-
tification System and Priority Assessment
Model: Model Documentation.
PB91-168468/CDH See 1143
PB91-170407/CDH
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP National Listing by Site.
PB91 -170407/CDH See 0834
PB91-170415/CDH
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP National Listing Alphabetically by Party
Name.
PB91 -170415/CDH See 0828
PB91-170423/CDH
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
Frequency by Party Name Report.
PB91-170423/CDH See 0609
PB91-170449/CDH
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Connecticut.
PB91 -170449/CDH See 0641
PB91-170456/CDH
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Maine.
PB91-170456/CDH See 0674
PB91-170464/CDH
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
i PRP Listing by Site for Massachusetts.
PB91-170464/CDH See 0680
PB91-170472/CDH
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
i; PRP Listing by Site for New Hampshire.
PB91-170472/CDH See 0704
PB91-170480/CDH
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Rhode Island.
PB91-170480/CDH See 0789
PB91-170498/CDH
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Vermont.
PB91-170498/CDH See 0810
PB91-170514/CDH
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for New Jersey.
PB91 -170514/CDH See 0707
PB91-170522/CDH
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for New York.
PB91-170522/CDH See 0713
PB91-170530/CDH
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Puerto Rico.
PB91-170530/CDH See 0737
PB91-170555/CDH
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Delaware.
,,, PB91-170555/CDH See 0644
PB91-170563/CDH
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Maryland.
PB91-170563/CDH See 0677
PB91-170571/CDH
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Pennsylvania.
PB91 -170571 /CDH See 0734
PB91-170589/CDH
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Virginia.
PB91-170589/CDH See 0812
PB91-170597/CDH
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for West Virginia.
PB91-170597/CDH See 0818
PB91-170613/CDH
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Alabama.
PB91 -170613/CDH See 0623
PB91-170621/CDH
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Florida.
PB91 -170621 /CDH See 0647
PB91-170639/CDH
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Georgia.
PB91-170639/CDH See 0650
PB91-170647/CDH
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Kentucky.
PB91-170647/CDH See 0668
PB91-170654/CDH
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Mississippi.
PB91-170654/CDH See 0689
PB91-170662/CDH
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for North Carolina.
PB91-170662/CDH See 0716
PB91-170670/CDH
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for South Carolina.
PB91 -170670/CDH See 0792
PB91-170688/CDH
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Tennessee.
PB91-170688/CDH See 0798
PB91-170704/CDH
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Illinois.
PB91-170704/CDH See 0656
PB91-170712/CDH
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Indiana.
PB91 -170712/CDH See 0659
PB91-170720/CDH
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Michigan.
PB91-170720/CDH See 0683
PB91-170738/CDH
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Minnesota.
PB91-170738/CDH See 0686
PB91-170746/CDH
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Ohio.
PB91-170746/CDH See 0725
PB91-170753/CDH '
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Wisconsin.
PB91-170753/CDH See 0821
PB91-170779/CDH
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Arkansas.
PB91-170779/CDH See 0632
Kin,
-------
NUMBER INDEX
PB91-193409/CDH
PB91-170787/CDH
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Louisiana.
PB91-170787/CDH See 0671
PB91-170795/CDH
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for New Mexico.
PB91-170795/CDH See 0710
PB91-170803/CDH
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Oklahoma.
PB91-170803/CDH See 0728
PB91-170811/CDH
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Texas.
PB91 -170811 /CDH See 0801
PB91-170837/CDH
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Iowa.
PB91 -170837/CDH See 0662
PB91-170845/CDH
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Kansas.
PB91-170845/CDH See 0665
PB91-170852/CDH
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Missouri.
PB91-170852/CDH See 0692
PB91-170860/CDH
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Nebraska.
PB91-170860/CDH See 0698
PB91-170886/CDH
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
' PRP Listing by Site for Colorado.
PB91-170886/CDH See 0638
PB91-170894/CDH
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Montana.
PB91-170894/CDH See 0695
PB91-170902/CDH
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for North Dakota.
PB91-170902/CDH See 0719
PB91-170910/CDH
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for South Dakota.
PB91-170910/CDH See 0795
PB91-170928/CDH
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Utah.
PB91-170928/CDH . See 0807
PB91-170936/CDH
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Wyoming.
PB91 -170936/CDH See 0824
PB91-170951/CDH
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for American Samoa.
PB91 -170951 /CDH See 0626
PB91-170969/CDH
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Arizona.
PB91-170969/CDH See 0629
PB91-170977/CDH
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for California.
PB91-170977/CDH See 0635
PB91-170985/CDH
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Nevada.
PB91-170985/CDH See 0701
PB91-170993/CDH
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Northern Marianas.
PB91-170993/CDH See 0722
PB91-171009/CDH
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Trust Territories.
. PB91-171009/CDH See 0804
PB91-171025/CDH
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Idaho.
PB91 -171025/CDH See 0653
PB91-171033/CDH
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Oregon.
PB91 -171033/CDH See 0731
PB91-171041/CDH
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Washington.
PB91-171041/CDH See 0815
PB91-171686/CDH
EPA SITE Demonstration of the International
Waste Technologies/Geo:Con In situ Stabiliza-
tion/Solidification Process.
PB91-171686/CDH , See 1553
PB91-171694/CDH
Use of Electrokinetics for Hazardous Waste
Site Remediation.
PB91-171694/CDH See 1366
PB91-176891/CDH
Demonstration Projects Under the U.S. EPA
Superfund Innovative Technology Evaluation
Program.
PB91-176891/CDH See 1230
PB91-176909/CDH
Demonstration of Hazardous Waste Site Treat-
ment Technologies.
PB91-176909/CDH See 1227
PB91-177386/CDH
Evaluating the Effectiveness of Ground Water
Extraction Systems.
PB91-177386/CDH See 1443
PB91-179085/CDH
Alternative Biological Treatment Processes for
Remediation of Creosote-and PCP-Contaminat-
ed Materials: Bench-Scale Treatability Studies.
PB91-179085/CDH See 1418
PB91-181768/CDH
Toxic Treatments 'In-situ' Steam/Hot-Air Strip-
ping Technology. Applications Analysis Report.
PB91-181768/CDH See 1545
PB91-182097/CDH
EPA Site Demonstration of the Terra Vac In
situ Vacuum Extraction Process in Groveland,
Massachusetts. (Site Program Update: Part
VII).
PB91-182097/CDH See 1243
PB91-I82279/CDH
EPA Site Demonstration of BioTrol Aqueous
Treatment System.
PB91-182279/CDH See 1441
PB91-182329/CDH
Development and Use of Site-Specific Chemi-
cal and Biological Criteria for Assessing New
Bedford Harbor Pilot Dredging Project.
PB91-182329/CDH See 1583
PB91-182493/CDH
Operations and Research at the U.S. EPA In-
cineration Research Facility: Annual Report for
FY90.
PB91-182493/CDH See 1483
PB91-182725/CDH
Control of Transient Incinerator Emissions with
an Oxygen Based Combustion System.
PB91-182725/CDH See 1401
PB91-182840/CDH
Sector Sampling for VOC's'during Remediation
of Superfund Site at Shaver's Farm, Georgia.
PB91-182840/CDH See 1417
PB91-183541/CDH
Incineration Treatment of Arsenic-Contaminat-
ed Soil.
PB91 -183541 /CDH See 1268
PB91-186965/CDH
Biological Assessment of Toxicity Caused by
Chemical Constituents Eluted from Site Soils
Collected at the Drake Chemical Superfund
Site, Lock Haven, Clinton Co., Pennsylvania.
PB91-186965/CDH See 1491
PB91-186999/CDH
Enforcement Project Management Handbook.
PB91-186999/CDH See 0532
PB91-187005/CDH
Final Guidance on Preparing Waste-In Lists
and Volumetric Rankings for Release to Poten-
tially Responsible Parties (PRPs) under
CERCLA ('Waste-In' Guidance).
PB91-187005/CDH See 0542
PB91-187013/CDH
Model Informational Notice Letter to Local
Governments.
PB91 -187013/CDH See 0575
PB91-187021/CDH
CERCLA Implementation of Inspector Training
Requirements for OSCs/RPMs at the Interme-
diate Level in STEP and First-Line Supervisors.
PB91-187021/CDH See 0517
PB91-187039/CDH
Questions and Answers About the State Role
in Remedy Selection at Non-Fund-Financed
Enforcement Sites.
PB91-187039/CDH See 0482
PB91-187054/CDH
Chemfix Technologies, Inc. Solidification/Stabi-
lization Process. Application Analysis Report.
PB91-187054/CDH See 1551
PB91-190850/CDH
CERCLA Removal Actions at Methane Re-
lease Sites.
PB91-190850/CDH See 0416
PB91-190975/CDH
Air/Superfund National Technical Guidance
Study Series. Emission Factors for Superfund
Remediation Technologies.
PB91-190975/CDH See 1381
PB91-191007/CDH
Basic Concepts of Contaminant Sorption at
Hazardous Waste Sites (Ground Water Issue).
PB91-191007/CDH See 1431
PB91-191056/CDH
Reductive Dehalogenation of Organic Contami-
nants in Soils and Ground Water. Ground
Water Issue.
PB91-191056/CDH See 1527
PB91-191106/CDH
Evaluating Amphibian Responses in Wetlands
Impacted by Mining Activities in the Western
United States.
PB91 -191106/CDH See 1586
PB91-193409/CDH
Superfund Desk Reference for Municipalities.
PB91-193409/CDH See 0486
NU-43
-------
PB91-193417/CDH
NUMBER INDEX
I;I": I:
PB91-193417/CDH
SffBSmittal of Model Consent Decree for
OERCLA Section 104(e) Information Request
Enforcement Actions.
ESHd WT/COfJ h , See 0888
PB9M98246/CDH
SfTE Demonstration of the American Combus-
tion Pyrolron Oxygen-Enhanced Burner.
P,891r196246/C0H ,. ,,,,,,§661299
PB91-199844/CDH
Us« of a Fourier Transform Spectrometer as a
Remote Sensor at Superfund Sites.
P891-199844/CDH See 1365
PB91-201673/CDH
United States Environmental Protection
Agency Modol CERCLA RD/RA Consent
Decree.
PB91-201673/CDH See 0890
PB91-201764/CDH
Evaluation of, and Additional Guidance on. Is-
suance of Unilateral Administrative Orders
(UAOs) for RD/RA.
P881-201764/CDH See 0538
PB91-204321/CDH
QiSSrf*Jtef.Choosing Indicator Species for Eco-
logical Ri»k Assessments at Superfund Sites
(90-6402).
PB91-204321/CDH See 1224
PB91-204628/CDH
Wffifen""Demand for CERClA Cost Recovery
PB9^2Q4§28/CPH See 0894
PB91-206476/CDH
Pojcy Towards Owners of Residential Property
at Suporfund Sttes.
PB91-205476/CDH See 0586
PB9J;20J492/C,PH
toiJSmwntaiion of the Decentralized Contrac-
tc? Performance Evaluation and Award Fee
Procoss for Selected Remedial Program Con-
tracts.
PB91-205492/CDH See 0031
PB91-205526/CDH
, Suppiomontal Guidance on Performing Risk
Ass»ssnwnts In Remedial InvestigaBon/Feasi-
b% Studies (RI/FSs). Conducted by Potential-
ly Responsible Parties (PRPs).
P891-205526/CDH See 1078
PB91-211888/CDH
Aif/Superfund National Technical Guidance
Study Series: Estimation of Air Impacts for Air
Stripping of Contaminated Water.
PB91-211888/CDH See 1382
PB91-211912/CDH
Rote of Health Research in Support of EPA's
Regulatory Programs.
PSJ|;2J191?/CDH See 1074
PB91-211938/CDH
Measurement o< Hydraulic Conductivity Distri-
butions: A Manual of Practice.
PB91-211938/CDH See 1467
PB91-213819/CDH
Exxon Vaktoz CHI Spill. A Report to the Presi-
dent
P89I-213819/CDH See 0928
PB91:213827/<;PH .'.'I. '.,, , ' ,-„
FtoW Standard Operating Procedures for Es-
tabtohJng Work Zones (F.S.O.P. 6).
PB9I-213827/CDH See 0911
PB91-213835/CpH
F^Hstindard Qperatiog Procedures for Prep-
a*a|gn of a SftQ Safety Plan F.S.O.P. No. 9.
PB9i-213835/CDH See 0912
PB91-213843/CDH
Reid Standard Operating Procedures for Air
Surveillance F.S.O.P. No. 8.
PB91-213843/CDH See 0910
PB91-213850/CDH
Field Standard Operating Procedures for the
Decontamination of Response Personnel
F.S.O.P. No. 7.
PB91-21385Q/CDH See 0913
PB9J-213868/CDH
Oil Spill Prevention, Control, and Countermeas-
ures Program. Task Force Report.
PB91-213868/CDH See 0932
PB91-214080/CDH
Guidance for Coordinating ATSDR Health As-
sessment Activities with the Superfund Reme-
dial Process.
PB91-214080/CDH See 1029
PB91-214098/CDH
CERCLA Compliance with Other Environmen-
tal Statutes.
PB91-214098/CDH See 0404
PB91-214106/CDH
Superfund Remedial Program Financial Man-
agement Authority, Responsibilities and Proce-
dures.
PB91-214106/CDH See 1137
PB91-214122/CDH
Superfund LDR Guide No. 7. Determining
When Land Disposal Restrictions (LDRs) Are
Relevant and Appropriate to CERCLA Re-
sponse Actions.
PB91-214122/CDH See 0446
PB91-214171/CDH
Assurance of Hazardous Waste Capacity,
Guidance to State Officials. Assistance in Ful-
filling the Requirements of CERCLA 104(c)(9).
PB91-214171/CDH See 0129
PB91-214197/CDH
Risk Assessment in Superfund: A Primer. First
Edition, September 1990.
PB91-214197/CDH See 1073
PB91-214205/CDH
Consideration of RCRA Requirements in Per-
forming CERCLA Responses at Mining Waste
Sites.
PB91-214205/CDH See 0420
PB91-214221/CDH
Role of Expedited Response Actions under
SARA.
PB91-214221/CDH See 1116
PB91-214296/CDH
User's Guide to the Contract Laboratory Pro-
gram.
PB91-214296/CDH See 0079
PB91-214957/CDH
OERR Organizational Conflict of Interest
Review and Approval Program (Superfund
Management Review: Recommendation No.
46C).
PB91-214957/CDH See 0046
PB91-214965/CDH
ARCS Work Assignment Management: Field
Guide.
PB91-214965/CDH See 0021
PB91-214973/CDH
Land Disposal Restrictions as Relevant and
Appropriate Requirements for CERCLA Con-
taminated Soil and Debris.
PB91-214973/CD1-I See 0428
PB91-214981/CDH
RI/FS Streamlining.
PB91-214981/CDH See 1110
PB91-215020/CDH
Guidance for Organizing ARCS Contract Files.
PB91-215020/CDH See 0025
PB91-215053/CDH
Site-Specific Contracting for Removals.
PB91-215053/CDH See 1011
PB91-216218/CDH
Aseptic Sampling of Unconsolidated Heaving
Soils in Saturated Zones.
PB91-216218/CDH See 1489
PB91-218941/CDH
Importance of Quality for Collection of Environ-
mental Samples. Planning, Implementing, and
Assessing Field Sampling Quality at CERCLA
Sites.
PB91-218941/CDH See 0919
PB91-219097/CDH
New Methods for Modeling the Transport of
Metals from Mineral Processing Wastes into
Surface Waters.
PB91-219097/CDH See 1590
PB91-222059/CDH
Air/Superfund National Technical Guidance
Study Series. Database of Emission Rate
Measurement Projects.
PB91-222059/CDH See 1379
PB91-226308/CDH
Pilot-Scale Incinerability Evaluation of Arsenic-
and Lead-Contaminated Soils from Two Super-
fund Sites.
PB91-226308/CDH See 1288
PB91-227959/CDH
Summary of 'Methodologies for Implementa-
tion of CERCLA Section 122(g)(1)(a) De Mini-
mis Waste Contributor Settlements'.
PB91-227959/CDH See 0878
PB91-227983/CDH
Biological Treatment of Wood Preserving Site
Groundwater by BioTrol, Inc. Applications
Analysis Report.
PB91-227983/CDH See 1433
PB91-228015/CDH
Solvent Extraction Treatment.
PB91-228015/CDH See 1306
PB91-228023/CDH
Mobile/Transportable Incineration Treatment.
PB91-228023/CDH See 1481
PB91-228031/CDH
Chemical Dehalogenation Treatment: APEG
Treatment.
PB91-228031/CDH See 1210
PB91-228049/CDH
Slurry Biodegradation.
PB91-228049/CDH See 1428
PB91-228056/CDH
Soil Washing Treatment.
PB91-228056/CDH See 1532
PB91-228064/CDH
In situ Steam Extraction Treatment.
PB91-228064/CDH See 1512
PB91-228072/CDH
In situ Soil Vapor Extraction Treatment.
PB91-228072/CDH See 1511
PB91-228080/CDH
Thermal Desorption Treatment.
PB91-228080/CDH See 1357
PB91-228197/CDH
Summary of 'Notification of Out-of-State Ship-
ments of Superfund Site Wastes'.
PB91-228197/CDH See 0438
-------
NUMBER INDEX
PB91-921230/CDH
PB91-228262/CDH
Summary of 'Interim Policy on CERCLA Settle-
ments Involving Municipalities and Municipal
Wastes'.
PB91-228262/CDH See 0877
PB91-228270/CDH
Summary of 'Interim Guidance: Streamlining
the CERCLA Settlement Decision Process'.
PB91-228270/CDH See 0875
PB91-228288/CDH
Summary of 'Guidance of Landowner Liability
under Section 107(a)1 of CERCLA, De Minimis
Settlements under Section 122(g)(1)(b) of
CERCLA, and Settlements with Prospective
Purchasers of Contaminated Property'.
PB91-228288/CDH See 0872
PB91-228296/CDH
Summary of 'Releasing Information to Poten-
tially Responsible Parties at CERCLA Sites'.
PB91-228296/CDH See 0880
PB91-228304/CDH
Summary of 'Interim Guidelines for Preparing
NBARs'.
PB91-228304/CDH See 0876
PB91-228312/CDH
Summary of 'Guidance on CERCLA Section
106(a) UAOs for RD/RA'.
PB91 -228312/CDH See 0873
PB91-228320/CDH
Summary of 'PRP Search Supplemental Guid-
ance for Sites in the Superfund Remedial Pro-
gram'.
PB91-228320/CDH See 0879
PB91-228338/CDH
Summary of 'Guidance on Documenting Deci-
sions Not to Take Cost Recovery Actions'.
PB91-228338/CDH See 0874
PB91-228346/CDH
Handbook: Responding to Discharges of Sink-
ing Hazardous Substances.
PB91-228346/CDH See 1589
PB91-228361/CDH
Guidance on Oversight of Potentially Respon-
sible Party Remedial Investigations and Feasi-
bility Studies. Volume 1.
PB91-228361/CDH See 1094
PB91-228379/CDH
Guidance on Oversight of Potentially Respon-
sible Party Remedial Investigations and Feasi-
bility Studies. Volume 2. Appendices.
PB91-228379/CDH See 1095
PB91-228395/CDH
Inventory of Treatability Study Vendors.
Volume 1.
PB91-228395/CDH See 1171
PB91-228734/CDH
Consultation on Records of Decision (RODS)
for Containment-Only Remedies.
PB91-228734/CDH See 0521
PB91-228742/CDH
Written Demand for Recovery of Costs In-
curred Under the Comprehensive Environmen-
tal Response, Compensation, and Liability Act
(CERCLA).
PB91-228742/CDH See 0895
PB91-231191/CDH
Cost Estimating Systems for Remedial Action
Projects.
PB91-231191/CDH See 1123
PB91-233296/CDH
Evaluation and Testing of a Protocol to Deter-
mine the Aerobic Degradation Potential of Haz-
ardous Waste Constituents in Soil.
PB91-233296/CDH See 1503
PB91-233627/CDH
Remedial Action, Treatment, and Disposal of
Hazardous Waste. Proceedings of the Annual
Hazardous Waste Research Symposium
(17th). Held in Cincinnati, Ohio on April 9-11,
1991.
PB91-233627/CDH See 1135
PB91-233650/CDH
Environmental Compliance Branch, Standard
Operating Procedures and Quality Assurance
Manual, Revision 1.
PB91-233650/CDH See 0535
PB91-238584/CDH
Considerations in Ground Water Remediation
at Superfund Sites.
PB91-238584/CDH See 1436
PB91-238592/CDH
Superfund Technical Assistance Grant (TAG)
Handbook.
PB91-238592/CDH See 0499
PB91-238725/CDH
National Priorities List Book Set.
PB91-238725/CDH See 0147
PB91-238733/CDH
Citizens' Guidance Manual for the Technical
Assistance Grant Program.
PB91-238733/CDH See 0462
PB91-240523/CDH
Harmonization of QA Procedures for Environ-
mental Data Operations: Development of a Na-
tional Consensus Standard for Quality Assur-
ance for Environmental Programs.
PB91-240523/CDH See 0989
PB91-240572/CDH
Evaluation of Alternative Treatment Technol-
ogies for CERCLA Soils and Debris (Summary
of Phase 1 and Phase 2).
PB91-240572/CDH See 1504
PB91-2423S2/CDH
Enhancing State Superfund Capabilities: Nine-
State Study.
PB91-242362/CDH See047t
PB91-921202/CDH
SUPERFUND: Focusing on the Nation at
Large. A Decade of Progress at National Prior-
ities List Sites.
PB91-921202/CDH See 0321
PB91-921204/CDH
Progress Toward Implementing Superfund.
Fiscal Year 1989.
PB91-921204/CDH See 0300
PB91-921205/CDH
Conducting Remedial Investigations/Feasibility
Studies for CERCLA Municipal Landfill Sites.
PB91-921205/CDH See 1084
PB91-921206/CDH
Guidance on Remedial Actions for Superfund
Sites with PCB Contamination.
PB91-921206/CDH See 1261
PB91-921207/CDH
Superfund: Focusing on the Nation at Large. A
Decade of Progress at National Priorities List
Sites.
PB91-921207/CDH See 0322
PB91-921208/CDH
Guidance for Data Useability in Risk Assess-
ment. Interim Report.
PB91-921208/CDH See 1032
PB91-921209/CDH
National Priorities List Sites: Alabama.
PB91-921209/CDH See 0148
PB91-921210/CDH
National Priorities List Sites: Alaska.
PB91-921210/CDH See 0151
PB91-921211/CDH
National Priorities List Sites: Arizona and
Nevada.
PB91 -921211 /CDH See 0156
PB91-921212/CDH
National Priorities List Sites: Arkansas.
PB91-921212/CDH See 0159
PB91-921213/CDH
National Priorities List Sites: California.
PB91 -921213/CDH See 0162
PB91-921214/CDH
National Priorities List Sites: Colorado.
PB91-921214/CDH See 0165
PB91-921215/CDH
National Priorities List Sites: Connecticut.
PB91-921215/CDH See 0168
PB91-921216/CDH
National Priorities List Sites: Delaware.
PB91-921216/CDH See 0171
PB91-921217/CDH
National Priorities List Sites: Florida.
PB91-921217/CDH See 0174
PB91-921218/CDH
National Priorities List Sites: Georgia.
PB91-921218/CDH See 0177
PB91-921219/CDH
National Priorities List Sites: Hawaii.
PB91-921219/CDH See 0180
PB91-921220/CDH
National Priorities List Sites: Idaho.
PB91-921220/CDH See 0181
PB91-921221/CDH
National Priorities List Sites: Illinois.
PB91-921221/CDH See 0184
PB91-921222/CDH
National Priorities List Sites: Indiana.
PB91-921222/CDH See 0187
PB91-921223/CDH
National Priorities List Sites: Iowa.
PB91-921223/CDH See 0190
PB91-921224/CDH
National Priorities List Sites: Kansas.
PB91-921224/CDH See 0193
PB91-921225/CDH
National Priorities List Sites: Kentucky.
PB91-921225/CDH See 0196
PB91-921226/CDH
National Priorities List Sites: Louisiana.
PB91-921226/CDH See 0199
PB91-921227/CDH
National Priorities List Sites: Maine.
PB91-921227/CDH See 0202
PB91-921228/CDH
National Priorities List Sites: Maryland.
PB91-921228/CDH See 0205
PB91-921229/CDH
National Priorities List Sites: Massachusetts.
PB91-921229/CDH See 0208
PB91-921230/CDH
National Priorities List Sites: Michigan.
PB91-921230/CDH See 0211
NU-45
-------
PB91-921231/CDH
NUMBER INDEX
PB91-921231/CDH
National Priorities Ust Sites: Minnesota.
PB91-921231/COH See 0214
PB91-921232/CDH
National Priorities Ust Sites: Mississippi.
. P891-921232/CDH See 0217
PB9 j^9||233/Cp'H ,'"' '"~ ''„'"," _',,"',"' '\ "~r""
Natbnal'priprifes 'Ust Site's; Missouri.'"
El
National Prlorltlos Ust Sites: Montana.
PB91-921234/CDH See 0223
PB9I-921235/CDH
Nattona) Prioritlos Ust Sites: New Jersey.
PB91-821235/CDH See 0232
flOSl. Priorities Usl Sftes: Nebraska.
'I^IMe^CDf-j,, ^ See 0226,
'PBl|-92t 237/CDH '""1 "'I , , I,""""',. „"""..
rlatlonal Prioriti'os Ust Sites:' New Hampshire.
FS91-921237/COH See 0229
PB91-921238/CDH
National Priorities Ust Sites: New Mexico.
Pi91-821238/CDH See 0235
PB91-921239/CDH
National PrioriUes Ust Sites: New York.
Pi81-S2123,9/CDH ; . See 0238
PB§i.921240/CDH
Natkxwl Prioritlos Ust Sites: North Carolina.
PB91-921240/CDH See 0243
PB91-921241/COH
National Priorities Ust Sites: North and South
Dakota.
PB91-921241/CDH See 0241
PB91-921242/CDH
National Priorities Ust Sites: Ohio.
P,i9J-?21242/CDH See 0247
PB91-921243/COH
National Priorities Ust Sites: Oklahoma.
PB91-921243/CDH See 0250
PB91-921244/CDH
NaMonal Priorities Ust Sites; Oregon.
P8ll-921244/CbH See 0253
PB91-921245/CDH
National Priorities Ust Sites: Pennsylvania.
PB91-921245/CDH See 0256
PB91-921246/CDH
Naikmal Priorities Ust Sites: Rhode Island.
PB91-821246/COH See 0262
PB91-921247/CDH
Nattenal Priorities Ust Sites: South Carolina.
PS91-S21247/CDH See 0266
PB91-921248/CDH
National Priorities Ust Sites: Tennessee.
P891-921248/CDH See 0269
PB91-921249/CDH
National Prforitlos Ust Sites: Texas.
PB91-921249/CDH See 0272
PB9^-921250/CDH
Nakkmal Priorities Ust Sites: Utah.
P891-921250/COH See 0276
PB91-921251/CDH
N|atlonal Priorities dst Sites:' Vermont.
PB91-9212S1/CDH See 0279
PB91-921252/CPH
Naikmal Priorities Usl Sites; .Virginia.
PB91-921252/CDH See 0282
PB91-921253/CDH
National Prioritlos Uat Sites: Washington.
PS91-921253/CDH See 0285
PB91-921254/CDH
National Priorities List Sites: West Virginia.
PB91-921254/CDH See 0288
PB91-921255/CDH
National Priorities List Sites: Wisconsin.
PB91-921255/CDH See 0291
vlpB9i-921256/CDH ' ',' ',. " ", '.,'". " ""
National Priorities Ust Sites: Wyoming.
PB91-921256/CpH 3660294
PB91-921257/CDH -
National Priorities Ust Sites: Puerto Rico.
PB91-921257/CDH See 0259
PB91-921258/CDH
National Priorities List Sites: American Samoa,
Guam and Trust Territories.
PB91-921258/CDH See 0155
' , : I!', !' :' "; fj V, ;.;:,:;! 'ill J ".| " - • ' 'u; ' ill',; „, i||/,:,i|',l|| llti JJ;;;
PB91-921259/CDH
Analysis of State Superfund Programs: 50-
State Study, 1990 Update.
PB91-921259/CDH See 0448
PB91-921260/CDH
Superfund Emergency Response Actions: A
Summary of Federally Funded Removals.
Fourth Annual Report - Fiscal Year 1989.
PB91-921260/CDH See 0314
PB91-921269/CDH
CERCLA Site Discharges to POTWS Treatabil-
ity Manual.
PB91-921269/CDH See 1577
PB91-921270/CDH
CERCLA Site Discharges to POTWS CERCLA
Site Sampling Program: Detailed Data Report.
PB91-921270/CDH See 1575
PB91-921271/CDH
Compendium of ERT Toxiclty Testing Proce-
dures.
PB91-921271/CDH See 0906
PB91-921273/CDH
Compendium of ERT Soil Sampling and Sur-
face Geophysics Procedures.
PB91-921273/CDH See 0904
PB91-921274/CDH
Compendium of ERT Surface Water and Sedi-
ment Sampling Procedures.
PB91-921274/CDH See 0905
PB91-921275/CDH
Compendium of ERT Groundwater Sampling
Procedures.
PB91-921275/CDH See 0903
PB91-921276/CDH
Compendium of ERT Waste Sampling Proce-
dures.
PB91-921276/CDH See 0907
PB91-921277/CDH
ROD Annual Report, FY 1990.
PB91-921277/CDH See 1112
PB91-921278/CDH
User's Guide to the Contract Laboratory Pro-
gram.
PB91-921278/CDH See 0080
PB91-921280/CDH
Compendium of Federal Facilities Directives,
1984 and 1985.
, i PB91 -921280/CDH See 0896
PB91-921281/CDH
Compendium of NPL Listing Policies and Pro-
cedures, 1982 to 1985.
PB91 -921281 /CDH See 0338
PB91-921282/CDH
Oil Spill Contingency Planning: National Status.
A Report to the President.
PB91-921282/CDH See 0931
PB91-921283/CDH
Survey of Materials-Handling Technologies
Used at Hazardous Waste Sites.
PB91:921283/CDH See1323
PB91-921285/CDH
Technical Support Services for Superfund Site
Remediation. Second Edition.
PB91-921285/CDH See 1335
PB91-921286/CDH
Superfund Program: Ten Years of Progress.
PB91-921286/CDH See 0977
PB91-921287/CDH
Continuous Release - Emergency Response
Notification System. User's Manual for Indus-
try.
PB91-921287/CDH See 1145
PB91-921288/CDH
Accessing Federal Data Bases for Contaminat-
ed Site Clean-Up Technologies.
PB91-921288/CDH See 1188
PB91-921289/CDH
Vendor Information Form to be Completed for
Participation in the: Vendor Information System
for Innovative Treatment Technologies
(VISITT).
PB91-921289/CDH See 1369
PB91-921290/CDH
Innovative Treatment Technologies: Semi-
Annual Status Report, January 1991. First
Issue.
PB91-921290/CDH See 1274
PB91-921291/CDH
Superfund Engineering Issue: Treatment of
Lead-Contaminated Soils.
PB91-921291/CDH See 1535
PB91-921292/CDH
Subsurface Contamination Reference Guide.
PB91-921292/CDH See 1474
PB91-921293/CDH
Bibliography of Federal Reports and Publica-
tions Describing Alternative and Innovative
Treatment Technologies for Corrective Action
and Site Remediation.
PB91-921293/CDH See 1206
PB91-921294/CDH
Ground-Water Issue: Characterizing Soils for
Hazardous Waste Site Assessments.
PB91-921294/CDH See 1455
PB91-921301/CDH
Streamlining the RI/FS for CERCLA Municipal
Landfill Sites.
PB91-921301/CDH See 1119
PB91-921302/CDH
Closing the NPL Book under the Original HRS.
PB91-921302/CDH See 0337
PB91-921303/CDH
Revised Hazard Ranking System: Background
Information.
PB91-921303/CDH See 0378
PB91-921304/CDH
Exemptions from the Statutory Limits on Re-
moval Actions.
PB91-921304/CDH See 1002
PB91-921305/CDH
Revised Hazard Ranking System: Qs and As.
PB91-921305/CDH See 0381
PB91-921306/CDH
Public Awareness Signs at Superfund Sites.
PB91-921306/CDH See 0481
NU-46
-------
NUMBER INDEX
PB91-921365/CDH
PB91-921307/CDH
Revised Hazard Ranking System: An Improved
Tool for Screening Superfund Sites.
PB91-921307/CDH See 0377
PB91-921309/CDH
CERCLA Compliance with the RCRA Toxicity
Characteristics (TC) Rule: Part 2.
PB91-921309/CDH See 0412
PB91-921310/CDH
Obtaining a Soil and Debris Treatability Vari-
ance for Removal Actions. Superfund LDR
Guide No. 6B.
PB91 -921310/CDH See 0430
PB91-921311/CDH
ARARs Q's and A's: State Ground-Water Anti-
degradation Issues.
PB91 -921311 /CDH See 0402
PB91-921312/CDH
Guidance for Data Useability in Risk Assess-
ment.
PB91-921312/CDH See 1030
PB91-921313/CDH
Compliance with Third Third Requirements
Under the LDRs. Superfund LDR Guide No. 8.
PB91-921313/CDH See 0418
PB91-921314/CDH
Risk Assessment Guidance for Superfund.
Volume 1. Human Health Evaluation Manual.
Supplemental Guidance: 'Standard Default Ex-
posure Factors'.
PB91-921314/CDH See 1071
PB91-921315/CDH
Assessing Reports of Continuous Releases of
Hazardous Substances: A Guide for EPA Re-
gions.
PB91-921315/CDH See 1142
PB91-921316/CDH
CERCLIS - WasteLAN - CleanLAN.
PB91-921316/CDH See 0015
PB91-921317/CDH
Guide to Developing Action Memorandums.
PB91-921317/CDH See 1097
PB91-921318/CDH
Superfund Guide to RCRA Management Re-
quirements for Mineral Processing Wastes.
PB91-921318/CDH See 0439
PB91-921319/CDH
U.S. Bureau of Reclamation Assistance to the
Superfund Program.
PB91-921319/CDH See 1138
PB91-921320/CDH
Using State and Local Officials to Assist in
Community Relations (Superfund Management
Review: Recommendation No. 43.K.L).
PB91-921320/CDH See 0128
PB91-921321/CDH
ARARs Q's and A's: The Fund-Balancing
Waiver.
PB91 -921321 /CDH See 0403
PB91-921322/CDH
Making Superfund Documents Available to the
Public throughout the Cleanup Process, and
Discussing Site Findings and Decisions as
They are Developed (Superfund Management
Review: No. 43 G, H, Q, R, T).
PB91-921322/CDH See 0100
PB91-921324/CDH
Final Policy on Setting RI/FS Priorities.
PB91-921324/CDH See 1090
PB91-921325/CDH
Suggested ROD Language for Various Ground
Water Remediation Options.
PB91-921325/CDH See 1475
PB91-921326/CDH
Policy on Management of Post-Removal Site
Control.
PB91-921326/CDH See 1008
PB91-921327/CDH
Superfund LDR Guide No. 6A (2nd Edition)
Obtaining a Soil and Debris Treatability Vari-
ance for Remedial Actions.
PB91-921327/CDH See 0445
PB91-921329/CDH
Policy on Floodplains and Wetland Assess-
ments for CERCLA Actions.
PB91-921329/CDH See 0437
PB91-921330/CDH
Sampler's Guide to the Contract Laboratory
Program.
PB91-921330/CDH See 0071
PB91-921331/CDH
Management of Investigation-Derived Wastes
during Site Inspections.
PB91-921331/CDH See 0349
PB91-921332/CDH
Applicability of Land Disposal Restrictions to
RCRA and CERCLA Ground Water Treatment
Reinjection Superfund Management Review:
Recommendation No. 26.
PB91-921332/CDH See 1430
PB91-921333/CDH
Total Quality Management (TQM) and Quality
Assurance (QA) in Superfund.
PB91-921333/CDH See 0996
PB91-921335/CDH
Headquarters Support Contract Management
Procedures.
PB91-921335/CDH See 0029
PB91-921336/CDH
Furthering the Use of Innovative Treatment
Technologies in OSWER Programs.
PB91-921336/CDH See 1255
PB91-921339/CDH
Hazardous Waste Operations and Emergency
Response: Uncontrolled Hazardous Waste
Sites and RCRA Corrective Actions.
PB91-921339/CDH See 0425
PB91-921340/CDH
Hazardous Waste Operations and Emergency
Response: RCRA TSD and Emergency Re-
sponse Without Regard to Location.
PB91-921340/CDH See 0914
PB91-921341/CDH
ARARs Q's and A's: General Policy, RCRA,
CWA, SDWA, Post-ROD Information, and Con-
tingent Waivers.
PB91 -921341 /CDH See 0401
PB91-921342/CDH
Establishing Work Zones at Uncontrolled Haz-
ardous Waste Sites.
PB91 -921342/CDH See 0908
PB91-921344/CDH
Innovative Methods to Increase Public Involve-
ment in Superfund Community Relations (Su-
perfund Management Review Recommenda-
tion No. 43.A).
PB91-921344/CDH See 0097
PB91-921345/CDH
Minimizing Problems Caused by Staff Turnover
(Superfund Management Review: Recommen-
dation No. 43, M, N, O).
PB91-921345/CDH See 0105
PB91-921346/CDH
Priority for Health and Safety Requirements,
Especially Medical Surveillance Requirements,
for EPA Employees Who Support OSWER Pro-
grams.
PB91 -921346/CDH See 0923
PB91-921347/CDH
EPA/U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Payment
Process, Direct Cite/Revised Reimbursement
Methods.
PB91-921347/CDH See 1125
PB91-921348/CDH
CERCLIS Listing.
PB91-921348/CDH
See 0014
PB91-921349/CDH
Superfund Docket Operations Manual for Rule-
making Activities.
PB91-921349/CDH See 0081
PB91-921350/CDH
Guide to Developing Superfund No Action, In-
terim Action, and Contingency Remedy RODs.
PB91-921350/CDH See 1098
PB91-921351/CDH
Guide to Addressing Pre-ROD and Post-ROD
Changes.
PB91-921351/CDH See 1096
PB91-921352/CDH
Interim Guidance on Establishing Soil Lead
Cleanup Levels at Superfund Sites. Supple-
ment to Interim Guidance on Establishing Soil
Lead Cleanup Levels at Superfund Sites.
PB91-921352/CDH See 1516
PB91-921355/CDH
Real Estate Acquisition Procedures for USAGE
Projects.
PB91-921355/CDH See 1133
PB91-921356/CDH
Guide to Pump and Treat Groundwater Reme-
diation Technology.
PB91-921356/CDH See 1462
PB91-921357/CDH
EPA Oversight of Remedial Designs and Re-
medial Actions Performed by PRPs.
PB91-921357/CDH See 1124
PB91-921358/CDH
Long-Term Contracting Strategy for Superfund
- Implementation.
PB91-921358/CDH See 0043
PB91-921359/CDH
Role of the Baseline Risk Assessment in Su-
perfund Remedy Selection Decisions.
PB91-921359/CDH See 1075
PB91-921362/CDH
Health and Safety Roles and Responsibilities
at Remedial Sites.
PB91-921362/CDH See 0918
PB91-921363/CDH
ARARs Q's and A's Compliance with New
SDWA National Primary Drinking Water Regu-
lations for Organic and Inorganic Chemicals.
PB91-921363/CDH See 0400
PB91-921364/CDH
Guide to Discharging CERCLA Aqueous
Wastes to Publicly Owned Treatment Works
(POTWs).
PB91-921364/CDH See 0423
PB91-921365/CDH
Guide: Methods for Evaluating the Attainment
of Cleanup Standards for Soils and Solid
Media.
PB91-921365/CDH See 1508
NU-47
-------
PB91-921366/CDH
NUMBER INDEX
I ,*
ft i
en:
il'fT
PB91-921366/CDH
Furthering th» Use of Innovative Treatment
Technologfes in OSWER Programs.
P89i-921366/CDH See 1256
PBfll-921367/CDH /,'",; ". ""',,," "',' ""', "
Gukte to Obtaining No Migration Variances for
CERCLA Remedial Actions.
PB91-921367/COH See 0424
PB91-921368/CDH
Structure and Components of Five-Year Re-
' "
PB92-102169/CDH
OSWER Source Book: Training and Technolo-
gy Transfer Resources.
PB92-1p2169/CH See 1283
''
,. . . ................ ............
,PJ91:@?13g8/CpH ......................... See 1120
'
.•• ... ...... .. .....
Structure and Components of Five-Year Re-
vtaws,
fB91.921369/CDH See 1121
PB91-921370/CDH
Update on Implementation of the Oil Pollution
Act of 1990. Volume 1, Number 1, February
1991.
PB91.92137P/CPH See 0936
PB91-921371/CDH
Update on Implementation of the Oil Pollution
Act ol 1996. Volume 1. Number 2, April 1991.
P891-921371/CDH See 0937
' '
, ,
Update on Implementation of the Oil Pollution
Act of 1990, Volume 1. Number 3, June 1991.
PB91:921372/CPH See 0938
PB91-921373/CDH
Superfund Innovative Technology Evaluation
Technology Demonstration Summary: Chemfix
SojfdMcatlon/StfibijIzatlon Process, Clackamas,
Oregon.
P891-921373/CDH See 1564
PB92-101435/CDH
atoms' Guidance Manual for the Technical
Ajsjstanca, Grant Program.
PB92-101435/CDH See 0463
PB92-101963/CDH
Adm!nlstrajiy,e perjajty Procedures.
PS92-1 01 963/CDH See 051 1
PBp-10i997/CDH ........................................
Eniferigerment Assessment Guidance. .....
PB92-101997/CDH See 0528
PB92-102045/CDH
Arbitration Procedures for Small Superfund
Co« Recovery Claims.
PJ92.102045/CDH ...................... §ee05J2
PBi2:10206p/CDH ...... ~ ™ . \ ..... ' ' , ', ........ . "," ,"''','
Timaly Initiation of Responsible Party
Searches. Issuance of Notice Letters, and Re-
l«iM of InfamjatjQfi (Attachment XXII).
PS92.Jp2060/5fjli ...................................... See 0886
PB92-102078/CDH
tejeriro Guidelines for Preparing Nonblnding
Prttlminary Allocations of Responsibility.
PB92-102078/CDH See 0564
PB92-iq2094/CDH [[[
.Fjjgrt.EPA ,P°Woy on, the Inclusion of Enyiron-
montal Auditing Provisions in Enforcement Set-
Uemorits.
; PB9,2-3,p2p94/CDH ........................ See 0541
PB92-102136/CDH
r^itU-MwSa Settlements of Enforcement
Cteim*.
PB92-102136/CDH See 0582
PB9,2-102144/CpH_r ...............
E^nflwrientAssessmentHandbook.
P892-102144/COH See 0530
.•.:•• .' s, Jill ..... ir 'ail i , • r ,;r-
,. ,
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Report by Site for Region 1, September
26, 1991.
PB92-105246/CDH See 0838
PB92-105253/CDH
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Report by Site for Region 2, September
26, 1991.
„ PB92-1Q5253/CPH See 0839
PB92-105261/CDH
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Report by Site for Region 3, September
26, 1991.
PB92-1 05261 /CDH See 0840
PB92-105279/CDH
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Report by Site for Region 4, September
26, 1991.
PB92-105279/CDH See 0841
PB92-105287/CDH
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Report by Site for Region 5, September
26, 1991.
PB92-105287/CDH See 0842
PB92-105295/CDH
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Report by Site for Region 6, September
26, 1991.
PB92-105295/CDH See 0843
PB92-105303/CDH
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Report by Site for Region 7, September
26, 1991.
PB92-105303/CDH See 0844
PB92-105311/CDH
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Report by Site for Region 8, September
26, 1991.
PB92-1 0531 1 /CDH See 0845
PB92-105329/CDH
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Report by Site for Region 9, September
26, 1991.
PB92-105329/CDH See 0846
PB92-105337/CDH
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Report by Site for Region 10, September
26, 1991.
PB92-105337/CDH See 0847
PB92-105345/CDH
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
Frequency by PRP Name Report, September
26, 1991.
PB92-105345/CDH See 0610
PB92-105352/CDH
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
National PRP Report by Site, September 26,
1991.
PB92-105352/CDH See 0619
PB92-105360/CDH
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
National Alphabetical Report by PRP Name,
September 26, 1991.
PB92-105360/CDH See 0612
PB92-105469/CDH
Community Relations during Enforcement Ac-
tivities and Development of the Administrative
Record.
PB92-105469/CDH See 0466
PB92-105485/CDH
Revised Hazardous Waste Bankruptcy Guid-
ance, October?, 1991.
,,^892-105485/00^, 362,0599
PB92-105857/CDH
Pilot-Scale Incineration of Contaminated Soil
from the Purity Oil Sales and McColl Super-
fund Sites.
PB92-105857/CDH See 1290
PB92-108166/CDH
On-Site Methods for Assessing Chemical
Impact on the Soil Environment Using Earth-
worms: A Case Study at the Baird and
McGuire Superfund Site, Holbrook, Massachu-
setts.
PB92-108166/CDH See 1521
PB92-109065/CDH
Guide for Conducting Treatability Studies
under CERCLA: Aerobic Biodegradation
Remedy Screening. Interim Guidance.
PB92-109065/CDH See 1157
PB92-109073/CDH
Guide for Conducting Treatability Studies
under CERCLA: Aerobic Biodegradation
Remedy Screening.
PB92-109073/CDH See 1156
PB92-109081/CDH
Superfund Engineering Issue: Issues Affecting
the Applicability and Success of Remedial/Re-
moval Incineration Projects.
PB92-109081/CDH See 1308
PB92-114461/CDH
Performance Evaluations of Pump-and-Treat
Remediations.
PB92-114461/CDH See 1471
PB92-115245/CDH
BioTrol Soil Washing System for Treatment of
a Wood Preserving Site: Applications Analysis
Report.
PB92-115245/CDH See 1492
PB92-115310/CDH
Technology Evaluation Report: Biotrol Soil
Washing System for Treatment of a Wood Pre-
serving Site. Volume 1.
PB92-115310/CDH See 1539
PB92-115328/CDH
Technology Evaluation Report: Biotrol Soil
Washing System for Treatment of a Wood Pre-
serving Site. Volume 2, Part A.
PB92-115328/CDH See 1540
PB92-115336/CDH
Technology Evaluation Report: Biotrol Soil
Washing System for Treatment of a Wood Pre-
serving Site. Volume 2, Part B.
PB92-115336/CDH See 1541
PB92-119023/CDH
DuPont/Oberlin Microfiltration Technology. Ap-
plications Analysis Report.
PB92-119023/CDH See 1584
PB92-121367/CDH
Extraction of Mercury from Groundwater Using
Immobilized Algae.
PB92-121367/CDH See 1450
PB92-124171/CDH
Toxicological Implementations of Remediating
Hazardous Wastes.
PB92-124171/CDH See 1359
PB92-124387/CDH
U.S. EPA SITE Demonstration of AWD Tech-
nologies' AquaDetox/SVE System.
-------
NUMBER INDEX
PB92-152933/CDH
PB92-124551/CDH
Application of a Plant Test System in the Iden-
tification of Potential Genetic Hazards at
Chemical Waste Sites.
PB92-124551/CDH See 1194
PB92-124767/CDH
Mining Sites on the National Priorities List:
NPL Site Summary Reports. Volume 1 (Alumi-
num Company of America (Vancouver Smelter)
to Cleveland Mill).
PB92-124767/CDH See 0350
PB92-124775/CDH
Mining Sites on the National Priorities List:
NPL Site Summary Reports. Volume 2 (Com-
mencement Bay Nearshore/Tideflats to Kerr
McGee) (Kress Creek, Reed-Keppler Park,
Residential Areas, Sewage Treatment Plant).
PB92-124775/CDH See 0351
PB92-124783/CDH
Mining Sites on the National Priorities List:
NPL Site Summary Reports. Volume 3 (Kerr-
McGee Chemical Corp. (Soda Springs Plant) to
Ormet Corp).
PB92-124783/CDH See 0352
PB92-124791/CDH
Mining Sites on the National Priorities List:
NPL Site Summary Reports. Volume 4 (Oron-
ogo-Duenweg Mining Belt to Tar Creek).
PB92-124791/CDH See 0353
PB92-124809/CDH
Mining Sites on the National Priorities List:
NPL Site Summary Reports. Volume 5 (Tele-
dyne Wah Chang to Wayne Interim Storage
Facility/W.R. Grace).
PB92-124809/CDH See 0354
PB92-125749/CDH
Superfund Innovative Technology Evaluation:
The Delaware SITE Study, 1989.
PB92-125749/CDH See 1322
PB92-125764/CDH
International Symposium on Field Screening
Methods for Hazardous Wastes and Toxic
Chemicals (2nd), Proceedings. Held in Las
Vegas, Nevada on February 12-14,1991.
PB92-125764/CDH See 1279
PB92-126838/CDH
Removal of Creosote from Soil by Thermal De-
sorption.
PB92-126838/CDH See 1530
PB92-126929/CDH
Prospects for In situ Chemical Treatment for
Contaminated Soil.
PB92-126929/CDH See 1525
PB92-129659/CDH
Biodegradation of Creosote and Pentachloro-
phenol in Contaminated Groundwater: Chemi-
cal and Biological Assessment.
PB92-129659/CDH See 1432
PB92-129683/CDH
Bench-Scale Evaluation of Alternative Biologi-
cal Treatment Processes for the Remediation
of Pentachlorophenol- and Creosote-Contami-
nated Materials: Slurry-Phase Bioremediation.
PB92-129683/CDH See 1419
PB92-129725/CDH
Bench-Scale Evaluation of Alternative Biologi-
cal Treatment Processes for the Remediation
of Pentachlorophenol- and Creosote-Contami-
nated Materials: Solid-Phase Bioremediation.
PB92-129725/CDH See 1420
PB92-129733/CDH
Detoxification of Pentachlorophenol and Creo-
sote Contaminated Groundwater by Physical
Extraction: Chemical and Biological Assess-
ment.
PB92-129733/CDH See 1438
PB92-131374/CDH
Index to the Monthly Hotline Report Questions
(June 1982 to December 1991).
PB92-131374/CDH See 0139
PB92-131390/CDH
Inside the Hotline: A Compilation of 1991
Monthly Hotline Reports.
PB92-131390/CDH See 0140
PB92-136878/CDH
Evaluation of Waste Stabilized by the Solidi-
tech SITE Technology.
PB92-136878/CDH See 1554
PB92-136936/CDH
Demonstration of Microfiltration Technology.
PB92-136936/CDH See 1228
PB92-139401/CDH
EPA SITE Demonstration of the Horsehead
Resource Development Company Flame Reac-
tor Technology.
PB92-139401/CDH See 1242
PB92-139476/CDH
Superfund Soils Data Management System.
PB92-139476/CDH See 1536
PB92-139500/CDH
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP National Listing by Site, January 22,1992.
PB92-139500/CDH See 0837
PB92-139518/CDH
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP National Frequency by Party Name, Janu-
ary 22, 1992.
PB92-139518/CDH See 0825
PB92-139526/CDH
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP National Listing Alphabetically by Party
Name, January 22, 1992.
PB92-139526/CDH See 0831
PB92-139534/CDH
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 1, January 22,
1992.
PB92-139534/CDH See 0741
PB92-139542/CDH
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 2, January 22,
1992.
PB92-139542/CDH See 0746
PB92-139559/CDH
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 3, January 22,
1992.
PB92-139559/CDH See 0750
PB92-139567/CDH
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 4, January 22,
1992.
PB92-139567/CDH See 0755
PB92-139575/CDH
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 5, January 22,
1992.
PB92-139575/CDH See 0760
PB92-139583/CDH
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 6, January 22,
1992.
PB92-139583/CDH See 0765
PB92-139591/CDH
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 7, January 22,
1992.
PB92-139591 /CDH See 0770
PB92-139609/CDH
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 8, January 22,
1992.
PB92-139609/CDH See 0775
PB92-139617/CDH
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 9, January 22,
1992.
PB92-139617/CDH See 0780
PB92-139625/CDH
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 10, January 22,
1992.
PB92-139625/CDH See 0785
PB92-143494/CDH
Limited-Use Chemical Protective Clothing for
EPA Superfund Activities.
PB92-143494/CDH See 1058
PB92-143676/CDH
Air/Superfund National Technical Guidance
Study Series: Estimation of Air Impacts for Soil
Vapor Extraction (SVE) Systems.
PB92-143676/CDH See 1383
PB92-143791/CDH
Quality and Environmental Protection: The
EPA QA Program.
PB92-143791 /CDH See 0990
PB92-144021/CDH
Control of Aromatic Waste Air Streams by Soil
Bioreactors.
PB92-144021/CDH See 1496
PB92-145564/CDH
Organic Contract Compliance Screening
System. Software for the PC (OLM01.8 Version
1). User Manual.
PB92-145564/CDH See 0057
PB92-145572/CDH
Organic Contract Compliance Screening
System. Software for the PC (SOW March
1990, Version 1). User Manual.
PB92-145572/CDH See 0059
PB92-145580/CDH
Organic Contract Compliance Screening
System. Software for the PC (Version June
1990). User Manual.
PB92-145580/CDH See 0060
PB92-145598/CDH
Inorganic Contract Compliance Screening
System Software for the PC (SOW March 1990
Version 1). User Manual.
PB92-145598/CDH See 0041
PB92-150416/CDH
Control Technologies for Defunct lead Battery
Recycling Sites: Overview and Recent Devel-
opments. Volume 3.
PB92-150416/CDH See 1220
PB92-150655/CDH
EPA SITE Demonstration of the BioTrol Soil
Washing Process.
PB92-150655/CDH See 1502
PB92-152933/CDH
Developments in Chemical Treatment of Con-
taminated Soil.
PB92-152933/CDH See 1499
NU-49
-------
PB92-152941/CDH
NUMBER INDEX
PB92-152941/CDH
PAST: Tha Potential ARARs Selection Tool.
PB92-1 52941 /CDH See 0434
PB92-153410/CDH
Technology Evaluation Report SITE Program
Demonstration of the DuPont/Oberiin Microfil-
teation Technology.
PB92-153410/CDH See 1350
PB92-164490/CDH
Application of a Water Quality Assessment
Modeling System at a Superfund Site.
P892-164490/CDH See 1573
PB32-16S743/CDH
Protection through Reconnaissance
Robotics at Superfund Remedial Sites.
PB92-1690X4/CDH
Guide for Conducting Treatability Studies
under CERCLA: Chemical Dehatogenatton.
PB92-169044/CDH See 1161
PB92-169275/CDH
Cfwmlcal Dohatogenatfon Treatability Studies
under CGRCtA: An Overview.
PB92-169275/CDH See 1209
PB92-169564/COH
Organic Contract Compliance Screening
System, Software for the PC (OLM01 .8 Version
2) (User Manual).
ES92-189564/CDH See n°58
PB92-170190/CDH
Superfund Innovative Technology Evaluation
Program Demonstration Plan for Westinghouse
Bio-Analytic Systems Pentachlorophenol Im-
Puncissays. ........................ ..................... " ................... ' .........
PB92-170190/CDH See 1310
PBS2-170570/CDH
Guide for Conducting Treatability Studies
CBder CSRCtA: SoH Washing. Interim Guid-
ance.
PB92-170570/CDH See 1165
PB,9;2-17Q58«/CpH;;,, ........... , _, ............ „ .. , , , _,„_,
1 gjjjy^ jo,. ' Cond'ucBng ........... Treatability" Studies
UftdOr CERCLA: Soil Washing: Quick Refer-
ence Fact Sheet.
, P892-1705§8/Cp|| ............................ See 1166
PB92-171909/cbH
AWSuparfund National Technical Guidance
Study Series. Guideline for Predictive Baseline
EmJstiorts Estimation Procedures for Super-
fund Sites.
PB92-171909/COH See 1387
PB92-171917/CDH
Air Suporiund National Technical Guidance
Study Series. Screening Procedures for Esti-
mating the Air Impacts of Incineration at Su-
perfund Sites.
PB92-171917/CDH See 1389
PB92-171925/CDH
Air Superfund National Technical Guidance
Study Series. Estimation of Air Impacts for the
Excavation of Contaminated Soil.
P892-17192S/CDH See 1384
PB»2;173087/CpH
QRJt Enfofcomeni Tracking System (SETS):
(aaUpnai PRP,, Using by Site.
P892-173087/CDH Sae0617
PB5Z-173095/CDH ....................................
SJlf Enforcement Irackjng System (SETS):
National PRP Listing Alphabetically by PRP
Mama.
PB92-173095/CDH See 0615
PB92-173103
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
National Frequency by PRP Name Report.
PB92-173103 See 0614
PB92-173111/CDH
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 1.
PB92-173111 /CDH See 0738
PB92-173129/CDH
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 2.
PB92-173129/CDH See 0743
PB92-173137/CDH
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 3.
PB92-173137/CDH See 0748
PB92-173145/CDH
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 4.
PB92-173145/CDH See 0752
PB92-173152/CDH
,., Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 5.
PB92-173152/CDH See 0757
PB92-173160/CDH
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 6.
PB92-173160/CDH See 0762
PB92-173178/CDH
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 7.
PB92-173178/CDH See 0767
PB92-173186/CDH
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 8.
PB92-173186/CDH See 0772
PB92-173194/CDH
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 9.
PB92-173194/CDH See 0777
PB92-173202/CDH
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 10.
PB92-173202/CDH See 0782
PB92-173210/CDH
Innovative Treatment Technologies: Semi-
Annual Status Report. (Third Edition).
PB92-173210/CDH See 1275
PB92-178953/CDH
Pilot-Scale Incineration of PCB-Contaminated
Sediments from the New Bedford Harbor Hot
Spot Superfund Site.
PB92-178953/CDH See 1292
PB92-179001/CDH
Innovative Treatment Technologies: Overview
and Guide to Information Sources.
PB92-179001/CDH See 1272
PB92-179043/CDH
Incineration Data on Arsenic and Lead Emis-
sions.
PB92-179043/CDH See 1267
PB92-179670/CDH
Demonstration of Waste Treatment Technol-
PB92-17967U/CDH See 1229
PB92-179845/CDH
Behavior of Arsenic in a Rotary Kiln Incinerator
(Journal Version).
PB92-179845/CDH See 1204
PB92-180025/CDH
In situ Soil Flushing. Engineering Bulletin.
PB92-180025/CDH See 1510
PB92-180033/CDH
Air Stripping of Aqueous Solutions. Engineering
Bulletin.
PB92-180033/CDH See 1371
PB92-180041/CDH
Control of Air Emissions from Materials Han-
dling during Remediation. Engineering Bulletin.
PB92-180041/CDH See 1398
PB92-180058/CDH
Granular Activated Carbon Treatment. Engi-
neering Bulletin.
PB92-180058/CDH See 1258
PB92-180066/CDH
Chemical Oxidation Treatment. Engineering
Bulletin.
PB92-180066/CDH See 1211
PB92-180074/CDH
Chemical Enhancements to Pump-and-Treat
Remediation. Ground Water Issue.
PB92-180074/CDH See 1434
PB92-182427/CDH
Future Land Use Scenarios for Federal Facili-
ties.
PB92-182427/CDH See 0897
PB92-188713/CDH
Superfund Innovative Technology Evaluation
(Site) Report for the Westinghouse Bio-Analyt-
ic Systems Pentachlorophenol (PCP) Immun-
oassays.
PB92-188713/CDH See 1321
PB92-191188/CDH
Solidification/Stabilization: Is It Always Appro-
priate.
PB92-191188/CDH See 1560
PB92-196013/CDH
Estimating VOC Emissions from Superfund
Sites in the Houston-Galveston Texas Area.
(NNEMS Project No. 1302).
PB92-196013/CDH See 1406
PB92-205855/CDH
Technology Evaluation Report: SITE Program
Demonstration Test Horsehead Resource De-
velopment Company, Inc., Flame Reactor
Technology, Monaca, Pennsylvania.
PB92-205855/CDH See 1353
PB92-206267/CDH
Comparison: Organic Emissions from Hazard-
ous Waste Incinerators versus the 1990 Toxics
Release Inventory Air Releases.
PB92-206267/CDH See 1217
PB92-206424/CDH
Long-Path FTIR Measurements of Volatile Or-
ganic Compounds In an Industrial Setting (July
1989-April 1991).
PB92-206424/CDH See 1413
PB92-206432/CDH
Canister-Based Method for Monitoring Toxic
VOCs in Ambient Air.
PB92-206432/CDH See 1396
PB92-206895/CDH
Evaluation of Personal Cooling Devices for
Dioxin Clean-Up Operation.
PB92-206895/CDH See 1248
PB92-213214/CDH
Horsehead Resource Development Company,
Inc. Flame Reactor Technology: Applications
Analysis Report.
PB92-213214/CDH See 1263
NU-50
-------
NUMBER INDEX
PB92-233071/CDH
PB92-216035/CDH
Technology Evaluation Report of Retech, Inc.,
Plasma Centrifugal Furnace. Volume 1.
PB92-216035/CDH See 1340
PB92-216043/CDH
Technology Evaluation Report of Retech, Inc.,
Plasma Centrifugal Furnace. Volume 2.
PB92-216043/CDH See 1341
PB92-216936/CDH
On-Site Engineering Report for the Low-Tem-
perature Thermal Desorption Pilot-Scale Test
on Contaminated Soil.
PB92-216936/CDH See 1519
PB92-217108/CDH
Respirometric Methods for Determination of
Biodegradability and Biodegradation Kinetics
for Hazardous Organic Pollutant Compounds.
PB92-217108/CDH . See 1427
PB92-217231/CDH
Application of Tradescantia Micronucleus
Assay for In situ Evaluation of Potential Genet-
ic Hazards from Exposure to Chemicals at a
Wood-Preserving Site.
PB92-217231/CDH See 1195
PB92-217322/CDH
Development of Emerging Technologies within
the SITE Program.
PB92-217322/CDH See 1231
PB92-218379/CDH
AWD Technologies Integrated AquaDetox
(Trade Name)/SVE Technology: Applications
Analysis Report.
PB92-218379/CDH See 1202
PB92-218791/CDH
Retech, Inc., Plasma Centrifugal Furnace: Ap-
plications Analysis Report.
PB92-218791/CDH See 1295
PB92-219732/CDH
• Forum on Innovative Hazardous Waste Treat-
ment Technologies (3rd): Domestic and Inter-
national. Held in Dallas, Texas on June 11-13,
1991. Technical Papers.
PB92-219732/CDH See 1254
PB92-220029/CDH
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 1.
PB92-220029/CDH See 0739
PB92-220037/CDH
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 2.
PB92-220037/CDH See 0744
PB92-220052/CDH
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 4.
PB92-220052/CDH See 0753
PB92-220060/CDH
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 5.
PB92-220060/CDH See 0758
PB92-220078/CDH
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 6.
PB92-220078/CDH See 0763
PB92-220086/CDH
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 7.
PB92-220086/CDH See 0768
PB92-220094/CDH
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 8.
PB92-220094/CDH See 0773
PB92-220102/CDH
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 9.
PB92-220102/CDH See 0778
PB92-220110/CDH
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 10.
PB92-220110/CDH See 0783
PB92-220128/CDH
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
National PRP Listing by Site.
PB92-220128/CDH See 0618
PB92-220136/CDH
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
National PRP Listing Alphabetically by PRP
Name.
PB92-220136/CDH See 0616
PB92-221985/CDH
Tech Trends (Number 8).
PB92-221985/CDH See 1328
PB92-222215/CDH
Technology Evaluation Report: Babcock and
Wilcox Cyclone Furnace Vitrification Technolo-
gy. Volume 1.
PB92-222215/CDH See 1337
PB92-222223/CDH
Technology Evaluation Report: Babcock and
Wilcox Cyclone Furnace Vitrification Technolo-
gy. Volume 2.
PB92-222223/CDH See 1338
PB92-223213/CDH
Tracking Toxic Substances at Industrial Facili-
ties: Engineering Mass Balance versus Materi-
als Accounting.
PB92-223213/CDH See 1362
PB92-224294/CDH
Super-fund Innovative Technology Evaluation
Program: Technology Profiles, Fourth Edition.
PB92-224294/CDH See 1316
PB92-224336/CDH
In-situ Bioremediation of Contaminated Ground
Water.
PB92-224336/CDH See 1465
PB92-224351/CDH
Technology Demonstration Summary, DuPont/
Oberlin Microfiltration System, Palmerton,
Pennsylvania. April-May 1992.
PB92-224351/CDH See 1336
PB92-224377/CDH
Guide for Conducting Treatability Studies
under CERCLA: Aerobic Biodegradation
Remedy Screening. Quick Reference Fact
Sheet.
PB92-224377/CDH See 1158
PB92-224385/CDH
Guidance on Site Assessment Cooperative
Agreements.
PB92-224385/CDH See 0475
PB92-224393/CDH
Technology Demonstration Summary: Bio Trol
Soil Washing System for Treatment of a Wood
Preserving Site.
PB92-224393/CDH See 1538
PB92-224401/CDH
Guide for Conducting Treatability Studies
under CERCLA: Soil Vapor Extraction. Quick
Reference Fact Sheet.
PB92-224401/CDH See 1164
PB92-224708/CDH
Bioremediation in the Field: An Information
Update on Applying Bioremediation to Site
Cleanup. (Number 4).
PB92-224708/CDH See 1423
PB92-224716/CDH
Vendor Information System for Innovative
Treatment Technologies (VISITT). Number 1.
PB92-224716/CDH See 1370
PB92-224724/CDH
Ground-Water Issue: The Effects of Well
Casing Material on Ground Water-Quality.
PB92-224724/CDH See 1457
PB92-224799/CDH
Superfund Innovative Technology Evaluation
Program: Progress and Accomplishments,
Fiscal Year 1990. A Fourth Report to Con-
gress.
PB92-224799/CDH See 1312
PB92-224807/CDH
Bioremediation in the Field. An Information
Update on Applying Bioremediation to Site
Clean-Up. Number 3.
PB92-224807/CDH See 1422
PB92-226448/CDH
Technology Evaluation Report: Site Program
Demonstration of a Trial Excavation at the
McColl Superfund Site.
PB92-226448/CDH See 1349
PB92-227271/CDH
Guide for Conducting Treatability Studies
under CERCLA: Soil Vapor Extraction. Interim
Guidance.
PB92-227271/CDH See 1163
PB92-227289/CDH
Technology Evaluation Report: Ogden Circulat-
ing Bed Combustor at the McColl Superfund
Site.
PB92-227289/CDH See 1344
PB92-227321/CDH
Pilot-Scale Incineration of PCB-Contaminated
Sediments from the Hot Spot of the New Bed-
ford Harbor Superfund Site.
PB92-227321/CDH See 1291
PB92-227388/CDH
Control Technologies for Remediation of Con-
taminated Soil and Waste Deposits at Super-
fund Lead Battery Recycling Sites.
PB92-227388/CDH See 1221
PB92-230358/CDH
BEN: A Model to Calculate the Economic Ben-
efit of Noncompliance. User's Manual.
PB92-230358/CDH See 0513
PB92-231299/CDH
Chemical Dehalogenation Treatability Studies
under CERCLA: An Overview.
PB92-231299/CDH See 1153
PB92-231307/CDH
Guide for Conducting Treatability Studies
under CERCLA: Chemical Dehalogenation.
Final Report.
PB92-231307/CDH See 1162
PB92-232388/CDH
Procuring Innovative Technologies at Remedial
Sites: Q's and A's and Case Studies.
PB92-232388/CDH See 1132
PB92-232396/CDH
Citizen's Guide to Thermal Desorption.
PB92-232396/CDH See 0460
PB92-233071/CDH
Citizen's Guide to How Innovative Treatment
Technologies Are Being Successfully Applied
at Superfund Sites.
PB92-233071/CDH See 0455
NU-51
-------
Mint !••'
fVf t
(ilit.'i
! t ,',
II ,!s
PS92-233089/CDH
PB92-2330B9/CDH
Clzon^'Gffiato'Solvenr'Extraction.'''
$?m§(sm !l"i!il!l >.';<' l
-------
NUMBER INDEX
PB92-963288/CDH
PB92-963214/CDH
National Priorities List Sites: Missouri.
PB92-963214/CDH See 0221
PB92-963215/CDH
National Priorities List Sites: Utah.
PB92-963215/CDH See 0277
PB92-963216/CDH
National Priorities List Sites: Arizona and
Nevada.
PB92-963216/CDH See 0157
PB92-963217/CDH
National Priorities List Sites: Virginia.
PB92-963217/CDH See 0283
PB92-963218/CDH
National Priorities List Sites: Maryland.
PB92-963218/CDH See 0206
PB92-963219/CDH
National Priorities List Sites: Idaho.
PB92-963219/CDH See 0182
PB92-963220/CDH
National Priorities List Sites: Arkansas.
PB92-963220/CDH See 0160
PB92-963221/CDH
National Priorities List Sites: Oklahoma.
PB92-963221/CDH See 0251
PB92-963222/CDH
National Priorities List Sites: Louisiana.
PB92-963222/CDH See 0200
PB92-963223/CDH
National Priorities List Sites: Alabama.
PB92-963223/CDH See 0149
PB92-963224/CDH
National Priorities List Sites: Mississippi.
PB92-963224/CDH See 0218
PB92-963225/CDH
National Priorities List Sites: Tennessee.
PB92-963225/CDH See 0270
PB92-963226/CDH
National Priorities List Sites: Georgia.
PB92-963226/CDH See 0178
PB92-963227/CDH
National Priorities List Sites: Kentucky.
PB92-963227/CDH See 0197
PB92-963228/CDH
National Priorities List Sites: Delaware.
PB92-963228/CDH See 0172
PB92-963229/CDH
National Priorities List Sites: West Virginia.
PB92-963229/CDH See 0289
PB92-963230/CDH
National Priorities List Sites: Rhode Island.
PB92-963230/CDH See 0263
PB92-963231/CDH
National Priorities List Sites: Vermont.
PB92-963231/CDH See 0280
PB92-963232/CDH
National Priorities List Sites: New Mexico.
PB92-963232/GDH See 0236
PB92-963233/CDH
National Priorities List Sites: Nebraska.
PB92-963233/CDH See 0227
PB92-963234/CDH
National Priorities List Sites: Iowa.
PB92-963234/CDH See 0191
PB92-963235/CDH
National Priorities List Sites: Montana.
PB92-963235/CDH See 0224
PB92-963236/CDH
National Priorities List Sites: North Dakota and
South Dakota.
PB92-963236/CDH See 0246
PB92-963237/CDH
National Priorities List Sites: Colorado.
PB92-963237/CDH See 0166
PB92-963238/CDH
National Priorities List Sites: Wyoming.
PB92-963238/CDH See 0295
PB92-963239/CDH
National Priorities List Sites: California and
Hawaii.
PB92-963239/CDH See 0163
PB92-963240/CDH
National Priorities List Sites: Pennsylvania.
PB92-963240/CDH See 0257
PB92-963241/CDH
National Priorities List Sites: New Jersey.
PB92-963241/CDH See 0233
PB92-963242/CDH
National Priorities List Sites: American Samoa,
Guam, and the Trust Territories.
PB92-963242/CDH See 0154
PB92-963243/CDH
National Priorities List Sites: Wisconsin.
PB92-963243/CDH See 0292
PB92-963244/CDH
National Priorities List Sites: Washington.
PB92-963244/CDH See 0286
PB92-963245/CDH
National Priorities List Sites: Oregon.
PB92-963245/CDH See 0254
PB92-963246/CDH
National Priorities List Sites: Ohio.
PB92-963246/CDH See 0248
PB92-963247/CDH
National Priorities List Sites: Michigan.
PB92-963247/CDH See 0212
PB92-963248/CDH
National Priorities List Sites: Illinois.
PB92-963248/CDH See 0185
PB92-963249/CDH
National Priorities List Sites: Indiana.
PB92-963249/CDH See 0188
PB92-963250/CDH
National Priorities List Sites: Florida.
PB92-963250/CDH See 0175
PB92-963251/CDH
National Priorities List Sites: Alaska.
PB92-963251/CDH See 0152
PB92-963252/CDH
Superfund: Focusing on the Nation at Large.
1991 Update.
PB92-963252/CDH See 0323
PB92-963253/CDH
National Priorities List Sites Set (1991).
PB92-963253/CDH See 0265
PB92-963256/CDH
Progress Toward Implementing Superfund,
Fiscal Year 1990: A Report to the Congress.
PB92-963256/CDH See 0301
PB92-963257/CDH
Superfund Contracts Management Issues.
PB92-963257/CDH See 0072
PB92-963258/CDH
Implementation of the Alternative Remedial
Contracting Strategy (ARCS) Task Force Rec-
ommendations: Transmittal of the Implementa-
tion Plan.
PB92-963258/CDH See 0030
PB92-963259/CDH
Regional Pilot Projects and Initiatives.
PB92-963259/CDH See 0064
PB92-963260/CDH
Congressional Limits for FY 92 Alternative Re-
medial Contracting Strategy (ARCS) Program
Management Costs.
PB92-963260/CDH See 0022
PB92-963261/CDH
National Oil and Hazardous Substances Pollu-
tion Contingency Plan (The NCP).
PB92-963261/CDH See 0146
PB92-963262/CDH
Superfund Policy Forum Update, Volume 1,
Number 1, February 1992.
PB92-963262/CDH See 0324
PB92-963263/CDH
Superfund Accelerated Cleanup Model
(SACM).
PB92-963263/CDH See 0119
PB92-963265/CDH
Superfund Progress, Spring 1992.
PB92-963265/CDH See 0329
PB92-963267/CDH
Superfund Progress - Aficionado's Version
(Progress as of March 31,1992).
PB92-963267/CDH See 0326
PB92-963272/CDH
Smart Moves in Superfund - Regional Initia-
tives. Volume 1, Number 1, February 1992.
PB92-963272/CDH See 0305
PB92-963273/CDH
Regional Pilots and Applications of Superfund
Accelerated Cleanup Model (SACM).
PB92-963273/CDH See 0110
PB92-963274/CDH
Contracting and Subcontracting Guide to the
Superfund Program.
PB92-963274/CDH See 0023
PB92-963278/CDH
Superfund Progress - Aficionado's Version:
Progress as of June 30,1992.
PB92-963278/CDH See 0325
PB92-963279/CDH
Superfund Progress, Summer 1992.
PB92-963279/CDH See 0330
PB92-963282/CDH
ARARs Fact Sheet: Compliance with the Clean
Air Act and Associated Air Quality Require-
ments.
PB92-963282/CDH See 0397
PB92-963283/CDH
Superfund: Qualified Disadvantaged Business
Utilization in State Response.
PB92-963283/CDH See 0498
PB92-963284/CDH
Regional Guide: Issuing Site-Specific Treatabil-
ity Variances for Contaminated Soils and
Debris from Land Disposal Restrictions (LDRs).
PB92-963284/CDH See 1528
PB92-963287/CDH
Superfund Accelerated Cleanup Model
(SACM). Volume 1, Number 4, November
1992.
PB92-963287/CDH See 0122
PB92-963288/CDH
Superfund: Report of the EPA Superfund Revi-
talization Public Meeting Held on June 24,
1992. Volumes 1 and 2.
PB92-963288/CDH See 0333
NU-53
-------
PB92-963302/CDH
NUMBER INDEX
PB92-963302/CDH
t>A".§oora Software^ Version 1.6. Users Manual
aW Tutorial.
P152.963302/CDH see 0371
Gukiartca for Performing ..... Preliminary Assess-
ments urjdor CERCLA.
pj92.^3u3/cW" ..... \ " '.'.',' !, See 0342
PB'i2-983,M4/CDH,"I,' . I , „' ".' ..'."..
NPL Characterization Project: National Results.
P892.963304/CDH See 0355
PB92-963305/CDH
NPL 'Characterization Project: Region 1 Re-
sults.
PB92-963305/CDH See 0356
PB92-953307/CDH
NPL Characterization Project: Region 3 Re-
sults. .........
PSS2-963307/CDH See 0357
PB92-963308/CDH
NPL Characterization Project Region 4 Re-
«fts, .............................................
Pfi92:963308/CDH See 0358
PB9M63309/CDH ...........................
NPL Characterization Project: Region 5 Re-
sults,
J!ii%a633Q9/CDHl" II ' ,'SeeQ359
PB92-963310/CDH
t*IPL" Characterization Project:" Region 6 Re-
sults.
PB92-963310/CDH See 0360
PB92-963311/CDH
NPL Characterization Project Region 7 Re-
suits.
PB92-96331 1 /COH See 0361
PB92-963312/CDH
NPL Characterization Project Region 8 Re-
sults,
PB92- 06331 2/CDH See 0362
PB92-963313/CDH
NPL Characterization Project Region 9 Re-
sjufts. ' .........
PB92.963313/CDH See 0363
PB52.963314/CbH
NPL Characterization Project: Region 10 Re-
Suits.
PS92-963314/CDH See 0364
PB|i?-963315/CpH ...... '„ ".. ..... "' ' .." ....... I
CERCLIS Characterization Project: National
.............................
PB92-963315/CPH, See 0001
PBS2-963316/CDH
GERQLIS Characterization Project: Region 1
l-Jfsuits. ...........................
pjij02-9633i6/CDHiy , ,"' , see 6002
PB92-963317/CDH """"ll ' '" ............ .......
CERCLIS Characterization Project: Region Z
Rcwtts.
f*892-963317/COH See 0003
PB92-963318/CDH
CERCLIS Characterization Project Region 3
Results,
PB92-963318/CDH See 0004
PB92-963319/CDH
CERCLIS Characterization Project Region 4
Results.
PB92-963319/COH See 0005
PB92-963320/CDH
CERCLIS Characterization Project Region 5
Rf SU'itS.
P892-S63320/COH See 0006
PB92-963321/CDH
CERCLIS Characterization Project: Region 6"
Results.
PB92-963321/CbH See 0007
PB92-963322/CDH
CERCLIS Characterization Project: Region 7
Results.
PB92-963322/CpH See 0008
PB92-963323/CDH
CERCLIS Characterization Project: Region 8
Results.
PB92-963323/CDH See 0009
PB92-963324/CDH
CERCLIS Characterization Project: Region 9
Results.
PB92-963324/CDH See 0010
PB92-963325/CDH
CERCLIS Characterization Project: Region 10
Results.
PB92-963325/CDH See 0011
PB92-963326/CDH
Revised Hazard Ranking System: Evaluating
Sites After Waste Removals.
PB92-963326/CDH See 0379
PB92-963327/CDH
Revision of Policy Regarding Superfund
Project Assignment between Alternative Reme-
dial Contracting Strategy Contractors and the
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers.
PB92-963327/CDH See 0068
PB92-963328/CDH
Audits and the Superfund Program Manager.
PB92-963328/CDH See 0087
PB92-963330/CDH
Political Subdivision Involvement in Superfund.
PB92-963330/CDH See 0480
PB92-963331/CDH
Debarment and Suspension.
PB92-963331/CDH See 0470
PB92-963332/CDH
Administrative Guidance for the FIT to ARCS
(FIT/ARCS) Transition.
PB92-963332/CDH See 0017
PB92-963333/CDH
Risk Assessment Guidance for Superfund.
Volume 1. Human Health Evaluation Manual
(Part B, Development of Risk-Based Prelimi-
nary Remediation Goals).
PB92-9633337CDH See 1068
PB92-963334/CDH
Risk Assessment Guidance for Superfund.
Vojume 1. Human Health Evaluation Manual
(Part C, Risk Evaluation of Remedial Alterna-
tives).
PB92-963334/CDH See 1070
PB92-963335/CDH
ECO Update: Ecological Assessment of Super-
fund Sites. An Overview. Volume 1, Number 2,
December 1991.
PB92-963335/CDH See 1019
PB92-963336/CDH
Homeowners Exempted from Superfund Clean-
up Costs: National Policy Overview.
PB92-963336/CDH See 0426
PB92-963337/CDH
ECO Update: The Role of BTAGs in Ecological
Assessment. Volume 1, Number 1, September
1991.
PB92-963337/CDH See 1020
PB92-963338/CDH
Estimating Potential for Occurrence of DNAPL
at Superfund Sites.
PB92-963338/CDH See 1442
PB92-963339/CDH
Risk Assessment Guidance for Superfund.
Volume 1. Human Health Evaluation Manual
(Part'B).
PB92-963339/CDH See 1067
PB92-963340/CDH
Risk Assessment Guidance for Superfund.
Volume 1. Human Health Evaluation Manual
(PartC).
PB92-963340/CDH See 1069
PB92-963341/CDH
Community Relations in Superfund: A Hand-
book.
PB92-963341 /CDH See 0467
PB92-963342/CDH
Accessing the $50 Million Set-Aside in the Re-
medial Action Budget for Quick Response at
National Priorities List Sites.
PB92-963342/CDH See 1082
PB92-963343/CDH
Authorization for Regional Administrators to
Approve Consistency Exemptions at NPL
Sites.
PB92-963343/CDH See 0998
PB92-963344/CDH
Update No. 2 to 'Procedures for Completion
and Deletion of NPL Sites'.
PB92-963344/CDH See 0395
PB92-963346/CDH
Evaluation of Ground-Water Extraction Reme-
dies: Phase 2. Volume 1. Summary Report.
PB92-963346/CDH See 1444
PB92-963347/CDH
Evaluation of Ground-Water Extraction Reme-
dies: Phase 2. Volume 2. Case Studies and
Updates.
PB92-963347/CDH See 1445
PB92-963348/CDH
OPA Q's and A's: Overview of the Oil Pollution
Act of 1990.
PB92-963348/CDH See 0933
PB92-963349/CDH
pREscore Software. Users Manual and Tutori-
al. Version 1.0.
PB92-963349/CDH See 0374
PB92-963350/CDH
Presentations EPA-State Soil Standards Con-
ference. Held in Crystal City, Virginia on Janu-
ary 29, 1991.
PB92-963350/CDH See 1524
PB92-963351/CDH
Summary of Treatment Technology Effective-
ness for Contaminated Soil.
PB92-963351/CDH See 1533
PB92-963352/CDH
Regional Quality Control Guidance for NPL
Candidate Sites.
PB92-963352/CDH See 0376
PB92-963353/CDH
Guide to Management of Investigation-Derived
Wastes.
PB92-963353/CDH See 0345
PB92-963354/CDH
Characterization Protocol for Radioactive Con-
taminated Soils.
PB92-963354/CDH See 1494
PB92-963356/CDH
Guidance for Data Useability in Risk Assess-
ment (Part A).
PB92-963356/CDH See 1033
N|J-54
I''
-------
NUMBER INDEX
PB92-963621/CDH
PB92-963358/CDH
Considerations in Ground-Water Remediation
at Superfund Sites and RCRA Facilities:
Update.
PB92-963358/CDH See 1437
PB92-963359/CDH
ROD Annual Report, FY1991. Volume 1.
PB92-963359/CDH See 1113
PB92-963360/CDH
ROD Annual Report, FY1991. Volume 2.
PB92-963360/CDH See 1114
PB92-963361/CDH
Superfund Accelerated Cleanup Bulletin: Pre-
sumptive Remedies for Wood Treatment Facili-
ties. Volume 1, Number 2, May 1992.
PB92-963361 /CDH See 0116
PB92-963362/CDH
Guidance for Data Useability in Risk Assess-
ment (Part B).
PB92-963362/CDH See 1034
PB92-963363/CDH
Guidance for Data Useability in Risk Assess-
ment.
PB92-963363/CDH See 1031
PB92-963364/CDH
Remedial Action Report: Documentation for
Operable Unit Completion.
PB92-963364/CDH See 1134
PB92-963367/CDH
Superfund Accelerated Cleanup Bulletin.
Volume 1, Number 1. Presumptive Remedies
for Municipal Landfill Sites.
PB92-963367/CDH See 0117
PB92-963368/CDH
FY 1992 Themes for Regional Coordination to
Support Continuous Improvements of Super-
fund's Remedial Program.
PB92-963368/CDH See 1091
PB92-963369/CDH
ECO Update. Volume 1, Number 3. The Role
of Natural Resource Trustees in the Superfund
Process.
PB92-963369/CDH See 1021
PB92-963370/CDH
ECO Update. Volume 1, Number 4. Developing
a Work Scope for Ecological Assessments.
PB92-963370/CDH See 1022
PB92-963371/CDH
Superfund Accelerated Cleanup Bulletin.
Volume 1, Number 3. Presumptive Remedies.
PB92-963371 /CDH See 0118
PB92-963372/CDH
Understanding Superfund Risk Assessment.
PB92-963372/CDH See 0508
PB92-963373/CDH
Supplemental Guidance to RAGS: Calculating
the Concentration Term. Volume 1, Number 1,
May 1992.
PB92-963373/CDH See 1079
PB92-963374/CDH
ECO Update. Volume 1, Number 5, August
1992. Briefing the BTAG: Initial Description of
Setting, History, and Ecology of a Site.
PB92-963374/CDH See 1023
PB92-963375/CDH
Guidance for Performing Site Inspections
under CERCLA.
PB92-963375/CDH See 0343
PB92-963377/CDH
Hazard Ranking System Guidance Manual.
PB92-963377/CDH See 0346
PB92-963401/CDH
Superfund Removal Procedures: Guidance on
the Consideration of ARARS during Removal
Actions.
PB92-963401/CDH See 1013
PB92-963403/CDH
Superfund Emergency Response Actions: A
Summary of Federally-Funded Removals. Fifth
Annual Report - Fiscal Year 1990.
PB92-963403/CDH See 0313
PB92-963405/CDH
Compendium of ERT Field Analytical Proce-
dures.
PB92-963405/CDH See 0902
PB92-963406/CDH
Compendium of ERT Air Sampling Procedures.
PB92-963406/CDH See 0901
PB92-963407/CDH
Technical Assistance Team (TAT) Contracts
Users' Manual.
PB92-963407/CDH See 0075
PB92-963408/CDH
Removal Program Representative Sampling
Guidance. Volume 1. Soil.
PB92-963408/CDH See 1010
PB92-963409/CDH
Superfund Removal Procedures: Removal En-
forcement Guidance for On-Scene Coordina-
tors.
PB92-963409/CDH See 1015
PB92-963410/CDH
Consideration of ARARs during Removal Ac-
tions.
PB92-963410/CDH See 0419
PB92-963411/CDH
CERCLA Notifications: Emergency Response
Notification System (ERNS) Fact Sheet.
PB92-963411 /CDH See 0926
PB92-963412/CDH
Overview of ERNS: Emergency Response No-
tification System (ERNS) Fact Sheet.
PB92-963412/CDH See 0935
PB92-963413/CDH
Oil Notifications: Emergency Response Notifi-
cation System (ERNS) Fact Sheet.
PB92-963413/CDH See 0930
PB92-963414/CDH
Standard Operating Safety Guides.
PB92-963414/CDH See 0925
PB92-963416/CDH
Superfund Removal Procedures: Public Partici-
pation Guidance for On-Scene Coordinators:
Community Relations and the Administrative
Record.
PB92-963416/CDH See 1014
PB92-963418/CDH
Analysis of State Superfund Programs: 50-
State Study. 1991 Update.
PB92-963418/CDH See 0449
PB92-963419/CDH
Guide to Removal Enforcement.
PB92-963419/CDH See 1006
PB92-963420/CDH
OPA Update: Implementation of the Oil Pollu-
tion Act of 1990. Volume 2, Number 1.
PB92-963420/CDH See 0934
PB92-963421/CDH
Superfund Emergency Response Actions: A
Summary of Federally-Funded Removals. Sixth
Annual Report, Fiscal Year 1991.
PB92-963421/CDH See 0315
PB92-963422/CDH
Notification Requirements for Continuous Re-
leases of Hazardous Substances.
PB92-963422/CDH See 1148
PB92-963602/CDH
Limiting Lead Transfers to Private Parties
during Discrete Phases of the Remedial Proc-
ess.
PB92-963602/CDH See 0571
PB92-963603/CDH
Overview of the Off-Site Policy for OSCs and
RPMs.
PB92-963603/CDH See 0433
PB92-963606/CDH
Guidance on Preparing Waste-in Lists and Vol-
umetric Rankings for Release to Potentially
Responsible Parties (PRPs) under CERCLA.
PB92-963606/CDH See 0554
PB92-963607/CDH
Methodology for Early De Minimis Waste Con-
tributor Settlements under CERCLA Section
122(g) (1) (A).
PB92-963607/CDH See 0573
PB92-963608/CDH
Accelerating Potentially Responsible Party Re-
medial Design Starts: Implementing the 30-Day
Study.
PB92-963608/CDH See 0509
PB92-963609/CDH
Interim Cashout Settlement Procedures.
PB92-963609/CDH See 0558
PB92-963610/CDH
Guidance on Procedures for Submitting
CERCLA Section 106(b) Reimbursement Peti-
tions and on EPA Review of Those Petitions.
PB92-963610/CDH See 0555
PB92-963611/CDH
Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Cleanup
Efforts Nationwide (White Chemical).
PB92-963611/CDH See 0971
PB92-963612/CDH
Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Cleanup
Efforts Nationwide (Bog Creek Farm).
PB92-963612/CDH See 0940
PB92-963615/CDH
Policy Towards Owners of Residential Property
at Superfund Sites.
PB92-963615/CDH See 0587
PB92-963617/CDH
Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Cleanup
Efforts Nationwide, Fail 1992. (Celanese Cor-
poration Site Profile).
PB92-963617/CDH See 0943
PB92-963618/CDH
Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Cleanup
Efforts Nationwide, Fall 1992. (Valley of the
Drums, Bullitt County, Kentucky).
PB92-963618/CDH See 0947
PB92-963619/CDH
Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Cleanup
Efforts Nationwide (City Industries).
PB92-963619/CDH See 0941
PB92-963620/CDH
Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Cleanup
Efforts Nationwide (McKin Company).
PB92-963620/CDH See 0953
PB92-963621/CDH
Superfund Information Repositories and Ad-
ministrative Records: Introduction for Librar-
ians.
PB92-963621/CDH See 0497
NU-55
-------
! inn*fit1: i :wmm'', ;>
PB92-963622/CDH
NUMBER INDEX
PS92r9fi3622/CDH
Suporfund Information Repositories and Ad-
ministrative Records,
PB92-963622/CDH See 0884
CERCLA Enforcement Policy Compendium
Update,
PBS2-963623/CDH See 0516
P892-963625/CDH
Soporiund at Work: Hazardous Waste Cleanup
Efforts Nationwide, Fall 1992. (Unsdowne Ra-
dioactive Residence Site Profile).
P892.963625/CDH See 0946
PB92-963827/CDH
Suporfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Cleanup
Efforts Nationwide. Fall 1992. (American Ther-
mostat Corporation, New York).
P892-963627/CDH See 0942
PB92:9f 3«28/<;DH [[[ ...................... .....
Suporfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Cleanup
Efforts Nationwide, Fall 1992. (Wide Beach
Section ofBfintTNew York).
PS92-963628/CDH See 0948
P892;963629/CpH ........................... ................................
Soporfund at Work: ..... Hazardous Waste Cleanup ''
Efforts Nationwide, Fall 1992. (Krysowaty
Farm, Hillsborough, New Jersey).
PS92-963629/COH See 0945
PBB2-M3630/CDH
Suporfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Cleanup
Efforts Nationwide, Fall 1992. (Ciba-Geigy Cor-
poration, Mclntosh, Alabama).
P892 963630/COH See 0944
PB93-100113/CDH
AutoMOUSE: An Improvement to the MOUSE
Computerized Uncertainty Analysis System
Operational Manual.
P893-100113/CDH See 1201
~ ' ' '"''
..
Demonstration of a Trial Excavation at the
MoCpfl Suporfund Site,
p93^6oi2t/CPHl ..... ."I ' ; See 1226
PBttMOOeWCDH.
Evaluatipn lpfll"l"tenr§§tria'l \ Indicators, for ..... Use' in
Ecological Assessments at Hazardous Waste
PB93-100865/COH See 1249
PB93-101152/CDH
Carver-GreenfieldProcess (trade Name) De-
%dro«Tach Corporation. Applications Analysis
Report.
P893.101152/CDH See 1207
PB93-105575/CDH
Engineering Bulletin: Slurry Walls.
P893-105575/CDH See 1235
PB93-105583/CDH
Engineering Bulletin: Pyrolysis Treatment
W93-10S583/COH See 1234
PB93-105591/CDH
Enginooring Bulletin: Technology Preselection
beta Requirements,
,. ei;93;10lSS9i1/CDH See 1405
PB93-105617/CDH
Literature Survey of Innovative Technologies
Hazardous Waste Site Remediation, 1987-
1991
'™' "~' ' " See 128J
Technical Guidance Document: Construction
Quality Management for Remedial Action and
Remedial Design Waste Containment Systems.
PB83-105625/CDH See 1334
PB93-106763/CDH
Asymmetric Loss Function for Superfund Re-
mediation Decisions.
PB93-106763/CDH See 1200
PB93-108322/CDH
PA-Score (Preliminary Assessment Score)
User's Manual and Tutorial. Version 2.1.
PB93-108322/CDH See 0367
PB93-115160/CDH
Technology Evaluation Report of Reteoh's
Plasma Centrifugal Furnace. Volume 1.
PB93-115160/CDH See 1342
PB93-115178/CDH
Technology Evaluation Report of Retech's
Plasma Centrifugal Furnace. Volume 2.
PB93-115178/CDH See 1343
PB93-116069/CDH
Compendium of Federal Rnancial Assistance
Programs: Targeting Programs for State and
Local Ground-Water Protection.
PB93-116069/CDH See 1435
PB93-121051/CDH
Evaluation of Commercially-Available Portable
, Gas Chromatographs.
PB93-121051/CDH See 1478
PB93-121325/CDH
Guide for Conducting Treatability Studies
under CERCLA: Thermal Desorption Quick
Reference Fact Sheet.
PB93-121325/CDH See 1169
PB93-121333/CDH
Selection of Control Technologies for Remedi-
ation of Lead Battery Recycling Sites. (Engi-
neering Bulletin).
PB93-121333/CDH See 1298
PB93-121341/CDH
Superfund Engineering Issue: Considerations
for Evaluating the Impact of Metals Partitioning
, during the Incineration of Contaminated Soils
from Superfund Sites.
PB93-121341/CPH See 1534
PB93-122257/CDH
„ Assessing Potential Indoor Air Impacts for Su-
perfund Sites. Air/Superfund National Techni-
cal Guidance Study Series.
PB93-122257/CDH See 1395
PB93-126175/CDH
Bioremediation: An Information Update on Ap-
plying Bioremediation to Site Cleanup.
PB93-126175/CDH See 1421
PB93-126597/CDH
Guide for Conducting Treatability Studies
under CERCLA: Thermal Desorption Remedy
Selection. Interim Guidance.
PB93-126597/CDH See 1170
PB93-126613/CDH
Superfund Innovative Technology Evaluation
Program: Progress and Accomplishments
Rscal Year 1991. A 5th Report to Congress.
PB93-126613/CDH See 1313
PB93-126787/CDH
Guide for Conducting Treatability Studies
under CERCLA.
PB93-126787/CDH
See 1155
PB93-131431/CDH
SITE-Ernerging Technologies: Laser Induced
Photochemical Oxidative Destruction of Toxic
Organics in Leachates and Groundwaters.
PB93-131431/CDH See 1591
PB93-131787/CDH
Chemical Stabilization of Mixed Organic and
Metal Compounds. EPA SITE Program Demon-
stration of the Silicate Technology Corporation
Process.
PB93-131787/CDH See 1212
PB93-131795/CDH '
Solvent Extraction Processes: A Survey of
Systems in the SITE Program.
PB93-131795/CDH See 1305
PB93-133387/CDH
Innovative Treatment Technologies: Semi-
Annual Status Report (Fourth Edition).
PB93-133387/CDH See 1273
PB93-134187/CDH
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP National Listing Alphabetically by Party
Name.
PB93-134187/CDH See 0829
PB93-134195/CDH
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP National Listing by Site.
PB93-134195/CDH See 0835
PB93-134203/CDH
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 1. Volume 1.
PB93-134203/CDH See 0742
PB93-134211/CDH
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 2. Volume 2.
PB93-134211 /CDH See 0747
PB93-134229/CDH
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 3. Volume 3.
PB93-134229/CDH See 0751
PB93-134237/CDH
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 4. Volume 4.
PB93-134237/CDH See 0756
PB93-134245/CDH
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 5. Volume 5.
PB93-134245/CDH See 0761
PB93-134252/CDH
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 6. Volume 6.
PB93-134252/CDH See 0766
PB93-134260/CDH
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 7. Volume 7.
PB93-134260/CDH See 0771
PB93-134278/CDH
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 8. Volume 8.
PB93-134278/CDH See 0776
PB93-134286/CDH
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 9. Volume 9.
PB93-134286/CDH See 0781
PB93-134294/CDH
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 10. Volume 10.
PB93-134294/CDH See 0786
PB93-138154/CDH
Air/Superfund National Technical Guidance
Study Series: Applicability of Open Path Moni-
tors for Superfund.
PB93-138154/CDH See 1375
PB93-140762/CDH
Cleaning Up the Nation's Waste Sites: Markets
-------
NUMBER INDEX
PB93-194025/CDH
PB93-141034/CDH
Pilot-Scale Incineration of Contaminated
Sludges from the Bofors-Nobel Superfund Site.
PB93-141034/CDH See 1289
PB93-141109/CDH
Small Systems Meet Superfund Challenge with
Point-of-Entry Treatment Units.
PB93-141109/CDH See 1304
PB93-143980/CDH
OSWER Source Book. Volume 1. Training and
Technology Transfer Resources, 1992-1993
PB93-143980/CDH See 1284
PB93-144111/CDH
Synopses of Federal Demonstrations of Inno-
vative Site Remediation Technologies.
PB93-144111 /CDH See 1324
PB93-144129/CDH
OSWER Source Book. Volume 2. Training and
Technology Transfer Resources, 1992-1993
PB93-144129/CDH See 1285
PB93-145621/CDH
Babcock and Wilcox Cyclone Furnace Vitrifica-
tion. Technology Demonstration Summary.
PB93-145621/CDH See 1203
PB93-145639/CDH
Horsehead Resource Development Company,
Inc., Flame Reactor Technology. Technology
Demonstration Summary.
PB93-145639/CDH See 1264
PB93-145647/CDH
Accessing Federal Data Bases for Contaminat-
ed Site Clean-Up Technologies (Second Edi-
tion).
PB93-145647/CDH See 1189
PB93-149227/CDH
Potential for Joint Research between EPA and
the U.S. Army.
PB93-149227/CDH See 1293
PB93-150142/CDH
Extraction and Recovery of Lead Species from
Soil.
PB93-150142/CDH See 1506
PB93-150159/CDH
Control Technology: 1992 Update of U.S.
EPA's Superfund Innovative Technology Eval-
uation (SITE) Emerging Technology Program.
PB93-150159/CDH See 1223
PB93-155968/CDH
Pilot-Scale Incineration of Contaminated Soil
from the Chemical Insecticide Corporation Su-
perfund Site.
PB93-155968/CDH See 1523
PB93-157626/CDH
Tech Trends (Number 11).
PB93-157626/CDH See 1331
PB93-159572/CDH
Inside the Hotline: A Compilation of 1992
Monthly Hotline Reports.
PB93-159572/CDH See 0141
PB93-163004/CDH
Pilot-Scale Incineration of Comtaminated Soils
from the Drake Chemical Superfund Site.
PB93-163004/CDH See 1522
PB93-163038/CDH
SITE Emerging Technologies Project: Babcock
and Wilcox Cyclone Vitrification.
PB93-163038/CDH See 1303
PB93-163046/CDH
Engineering Bulletin: Air Pathway Analysis.
PB93-163046/CDH See 1404
PB93-163053/CDH
Superfund Innovative Technology Evaluation
Program: Technology Profiles, Fifth Edition.
PB93-163053/CDH See 1315
PB93-168805/CDH
Estimation of the Cost of Using Chemical Pro-
tective Clothing.
PB93-168805/CDH See 1244
PB93-168813/CDH
Evaluation of Portable Gas Chromatographs.
PB93-168813/CDH See 1479
PB93-168821/CDH
Measurement of Volatile Organic Compounds
during Start-Up of Bioremediation of French
Limited Superfund Site in Crosby Texas Using
Wind Dependent Whole-Air Sampling.
PB93-168821/CDH See 1414
PB93-169126/CDH
Contingency Analysis Modeling for Superfund
Sites and Other Sources.
PB93-169126/CDH See 1219
PB93-172948/CDH
Applications Analysis Report: Silicate Technol-
ogy Corporation's Solidification/Stabilization
Technology for Organic and Inorganic Con-
taminants in Soils.
PB93-172948/CDH See 1550
PB93-173987/CDH
Air/Superfund National Technical Guidance
Study Series. Volume 1. Overview of Air Path-
way Assessments for Superfund Sites (Re-
vised).
PB93-173987/CDH See 1391
PB93-173995/CDH
Air/Superfund National Technical Guidance
Study Series. Air Emissions from Area
Sources: Estimating Soil and Soil-Gas Sample
Number Requirements.
PB93-173995/CDH See 1373
PB93-177129/CDH
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP National Listing Alphabetically by Party
Name.
PB93-177129/CDH See 0830
PB93-177137/CDH
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP National Listing by Site.
PB93-177137/CDH See 0836
PB93-177145/CDH
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 1.
PB93-177145/CDH See 0740
PB93-177152/CDH
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 2.
PB93-177152/CDH See 0745
PB93-177160/CDH
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 3.
PB93-177160/CDH See 0749
PB93-177178/CDH
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 4.
PB93-177178/CDH See 0754
PB93-177186/CDH
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 5.
PB93-177186/CDH See 0759
PB93-177194/CDH
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 6.
PB93-177194/CDH See 0764
PB93-177202/CDH
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 7.
PB93-177202/CDH See 0769
PB93-177210/CDH
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 8.
PB93-177210/CDH See 0774
PB93-177228/CDH
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 9.
PB93-177228/CDH See 0779
PB93-177236/CDH
Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 10.
PB93-177236/CDH See 0784
PB93-178259/CDH
On-Site Engineering Report of the Slurry-
Phase Biological Reactor for Pilot-Scale Test-
ing on Contaminated Soil.
PB93-178259/CDH See 1520
PB93-181220/CDH
Commencement Bay Nearshore/Tideflats Fea-
sibility Study. Executive Summary.
PB93-181220/CDH See 1579
PB93-181238/CDH
Commencement Bay Nearshore/Tideflats Fea-
sibility Study. Volume 1.
PB93-181238/CDH See 1580
PB93-181246/CDH
Commencement Bay Nearshore/Tideflats Fea-
sibility Study. Volume 2. Appendices.
PB93-181246/CDH See 1581
PB93-181253/CDH
Commencement Bay Nearshore/Tideflats Fea-
sibility Study. Development of Sediment Clean-
up Goals.
PB93-181253/CDH See 1578
PB93-183333/CDH
Computer Models Used to Support Cleanup
Decision-Making at Hazardous and Radioactive
Waste Sites.
PB93-183333/CDH See 1218
PB93-185551/CDH
Environmental Characteristics of EPA, NRC,
and DOE Sites Contaminated with Radioactive
Substances.
PB93-185551/CDH See 1237
PB93-186807/CDH
Air/Superfund National Technical Guidance
Study Series. Models for Estimating Air Emis-
sion Rates from Superfund Remedial Actions.
PB93-186807/CDH See 1388
PB93-192698/CDH
PREscore Software: Users Manual and Tutorial
Version 2.0.
PB93-192698/CDH See 0375
PB93-193720/CDH
In situ Treatment of Contaminated Ground
Water: An Inventory of Research and Field
Demonstrations and Strategies for Improving
Ground Water Remediation Technologies.
PB93-193720/CDH See 1466
PB93-193852/CDH
CERCLA/Superfund Orientation Manual.
PB93-193852/CDH See 0130
PB93-194025/CDH
Cleanup Information Bulletin Board System
Users Guide. (CLU-IN: Cleanup Information
Bulletin Board).
PB93-194025/CDH See 1215
NU-57
-------
PB93-199214/CDH
NUMBER INDEX
PB93-199214/CDH
'r _ Ai/Suporfund National Technical Guidance
'": Study' Series.' Volume 4. Guidance for" Ambient
A* Monitoring at Superfund Sites (Revised).
PB93-199214/CDH See 1393
;.: PB|3-199222/CpH
::'=' Alr/Suporfund National Technical Guidance
Study Series: Compilation of Information on
Roai-Timo Air Monitoring for Use at Superfund
Sites.
P893-199222/CDH See 1377
j;i pB|3-2j>09i3/cpfj
•I- S^Supisrfuno1 National Technical Guidance
Study Series: Evaluation of Short-Term Air
Action Levels for Superfund Sites.
P893.2Q0913/CDH See 1386
PBl3-2b3156/Ct»H
X-ray Fluorescence Survey of Lead Contami-
nated Residential Soils in Leadville, Colorado:
A Caso Study.
P883-203156/CDH See 1549
PB9,3-203958/CPH
Jfch, Trends (Number 10).
Pfi93-203958/CDH See 1330
ig'durrent Etectrocoagulatfcin for Su-
porfund Stht Remediation.
PB93-2Q5532/CDH
Tschnotogy Evaluation Report Pilot-Scale
Demonstration of a Slurry-Phase Biological Re-
actor (of Creosote-Contaminated Soil. Volume
p93-205532/COH See 1542
PB93-205862/CDH
Abstract Proceedings: Superfund Technical
Support Project General Meeting. Held in
Aliens,"Georgia on December 3-6,1990.
PB93-205862/COH See 1187
P^93-205870/CpH
Understanding Bforemediation: A Guidebook
fof Citizens.
P893-205870/C0H See 0507
PB|3-2fl62Q9/CpH
Stiperfund': Ehvirbnmental'Progress.
fB93-206209/CDH See 0976
Pli3:2lOl6l3,40l/C,pH
Bbremodiation in trie Field: Number i, Novem-
bar,1i90.
p§93^266340/CblH See 1424
PB93-206357/CDH
Tsch Trends Number 3, December 1990.
PB93-206357/CDH See 1325
PB93-206365/CDH
Tsch Trends Number 4, March 1991.
P883-206365/CDH See 1326
Tsch Trends Number 5, May 1991.
P893-206373/CDH See 1327
PB93-206331/CDH
Toch Trends Number 9, June 1992.
1%93-206381/COH See 1329
PB93-207504/CDH
Gfound-Water Modeling Compendium. Model
Foot Sheets, Descriptions, Applications and
Assessment Framework.
pS93.207S04/CpH See 1458
pgi3,2075S3/C0H
ria'ional Eval'jaticn of In-sttu Biorestora-
|Sn of' 'Coniaminated" Soil and Groundwater
peptambor i99Q)-fransiation.
PB93-2Q7S53/CDH See 1517
PB93-209898/CDH
Guidance for Capacity Assurance Planning.
Capacity Planning Pursuant to CERCLA Sec-
tion 104(c)(9).
PB93-209898/CDH See 0137
PB93-213528/CDH
Technology Evaluation Report: Perox-Pure
(Trade Name) Chemical Oxidation Technology.
PB93-213528/CDH See 1345
PB93-215614/CDH
Control of Air Emissions from Superfund Sites.
PB93-215614/CpH S,PS,I4,°P,
PB93-215622/CDH '
Estimation of Air Impacts for Solidification and
Stabilization Processes Used at Superfund
Sites. Air/Superfund National Technical Guid-
ance Study Series.
PB93-215622/CDH See 1408
PB93-215630/CDH
Estimation of Air Impacts for Thermal Desorp-
tion Units Used at Superfund Sites. Air/Super-
fund National Technical Guidance Study
Series.
PB93-215630/CDH See 1409
PB93-215648/CDH
Air/Superfund National Technical Guidance
Study Series: Estimation of Air Impacts from
Area Sources of Particulate Matter Emissions
at Superfund Sites.
PB93-215648/CDH See 1385
PB93-215655/CDH
Estimation of Air Impacts for Bioventing Sys-
tems Used at Superfund Sites. Air/Superfund
National Technical Guidance Study Series.
PB93-215655/CDH See 1407
PB93-216067/CDH
Technology Evaluation Report Toronto Har-
bour Commissioners (THC) Soil Recycle Treat-
ment Train.
PB93-216067/CDH See 1543
PB93-216596/CDH
Technology Evaluation Report: Site Program
Demonstration Test. Accutech Pneumatic
Fracturing Extraction and Hot Gas Injection,
Phase 1. Volume 1.
PB93-216596/CDH See 1352
PB93-217651/CDH
Risk Reduction Engineering Laboratory Site
Remediation Technical Support Program: FY92
Annual Report.
PB93-217651/CDH See 1296
PB93-218337/CDH
Superfund Innovative Technology Evaluation
(SITE) Program Evaluation Report for Antox
BTX Water Screen (BTX Immunoassay).
PB93-218337/CDH See 1320
PB93-222107/CDH
Acid Volatile Sulfide Predicts the Acute Toxici-
ty of Cadmium and Nickel in Sediments.
PB93-222107/CDH See 1572
PB93-222875/CDH
Removal of Radionuclides by Electrokinetic
Soil Processing.
PB93-222875/CDH See 1531
PB93-223196/CDH
Tech Trends: The Applied Technologies Jour-
nal for Superfund Removals and Remedial Ac-
tions and RCRA Corrective Actions. May 1993.
PB93-223196/CDH See 1333
PB93-226751/CDH
Comparison of a Revised Area Source Algo-
rithm for the Industrial Source Complex Short
Term Model and Wind Tunnel Data.
PB93-226751/CDH See 1216
PB93-227122/CDH
Technology Evaluation Report. SITE Program
Demonstration, Resources Conservation Com-
pany, Basic Extractive Sludge Treatment
(B.E.S.T. (Trade Name)), Grand Calumet River,
Gary, Indiana. Volume 1.
PB93-227122/CDH See 1593
PB93-227130/CDH
Technology Evaluation Report. SITE Program
Demonstration, Resources Conservation Com-
pany, Basic Extractive Sludge Treatment
(B.E.S.T. (Trade Name)), Grand Calumet River,
Gary, Indiana. Volume 2. Part 1.
PB93-227130/CDH See 1594
PB93-227148/CDH
Technology Evaluation Report. SITE Program
Demonstration, Resources Conservation Com-
pany, Basic Extractive Sludge Treatment
(B.E.S.T. (Trade Name)), Grant Calumet River,
Gary, Indiana. Volume 2. Part 2.
PB93-227148/CDH See 1595
PB93-227i55/CDH
Technology Evaluation Report. SITE Program
Demonstration, Resources Conservation Com-
pany, Basic Extractive Sludge Treatment
(B.E.S.T. (Trade Name)), Grand Calumet River,
Gary, Indiana. Volume 2. Part 3.
PB93-227155/CDH See 1596
PB93-227205/CDH
Site Emerging Technologies: Bioscrubber for
Removing Hazardous Organic Emissions from
Soil, Water and Air Decontamination Process-
es.
PB93-227205/CDH See 1302
PB93-228567/CDH
SITE Program Demonstration of the SBP
Technologies, Inc., Membrane Filtration
System on Creosote-Contaminated Water.
PB93-228567/CDH See 1592
PB93-229755/CDH
Field Applications of Robotic Systems in Haz-
ardous Environments, p1-29 1993. See also
PB86-176344 and PB92-166743.
PB93-229755/CDH See 1251
PB93-230027/CDH
Methodology for Evaluating Potential Carcino-
genicity in Support of Reportable Quantity Ad-
justments Pursuant to CERCLA Section 102.
PB93-230027/CDH See 1146
PB93-231165/CDH
Emerging Technology Report: Metals Treat-
ment at Superfund Sites by Absorptive Filtra-
tion.
PB93-231165/CDH See 1232
PB93-232684/CDH
Forum Focus, August 1993.
PB93-232684/CDH See 0136
PB93-233914/CDH
Handbook for Constructed Wetlands Receiving
Acid Mine Drainage.
PB93-233914/CDH See 1588
PB93-234565/CDH
In situ Bioremediation of Contaminated Un-
saturated Subsurface Soils,
PB93-23^565/CDH See 1509
PB93-2365GO/CDH
Foam Scrubbing (Chapter 9).
PB93-23'6560/CDH
See 1411
NU-58
-------
NUMBER INDEX
PB93-963235/CDH
PB93-237535/CDH
Technical Resource Document: Solidification/
Stabilization and Its Application to Waste Ma-
terials.
PB93-237535/CDH See 1565
PB93-500270/CDH
Organic Contract Compliance Screening
System (OCCSS) Software (OLM01.8 Version
3) (for Microcomputers).
PB93-500270/CDH See 0050
PB93-500288/CDH
Inorganic Contract Compliance Screening
System (ICCSS) Software (ILM02.1 Version 2)
(for Microcomputers).
PB93-500288/CDH See 0036
PB93-500346/CDH
PA-Score (Preliminary Assessment Score),
Version 2.1, 5 1/4 inch (for Microcomputers).
PB93-500346/CDH See 0370
PB93-500353/CDH
PA-Score (Preliminary Assessment Score),
Version 2.1, 3 1/2 inch (for Microcomputers).
PB93-500353/CDH See 0369
PB93-505345/CDH
Organic Contract Compliance Screening
System (OCCSS) Software (OLM01.8 Version
4) (for Microcomputers).
PB93-505345/CDH See 0051
PB93-505352/CDH
Inorganic Contract Compliance Screening
System (ICCSS) Software (ILM02.1 Version 3)
(for Microcomputers).
PB93-505352/CDH See 0037
PB93-505915/CDH
Preliminary Ranking Evaluation Score (PREs-
core) Version 2.0 (for Microcomputers).
PB93-505915/CDH See 0373
PB93-506053/CDH
Organic Contract Compliance Screening
System (OCCSS) Software (OLM01.8 Version
5) (for Microcomputers).
PB93-506053/CDH See 0052
PB93-506111/CDH
Site Assessment Information Directory (SAID)
Region 1 (for Microcomputers). Date of Cover-
age: October 1991.
PB93-506111/CDH See 0382
PB93-506129/CDH
Site Assessment Information Directory (SAID)
Region 2 (for Microcomputers). Date of Cover-
age: October 1991.
PB93-506129/CDH See 0383
PB93-506137/CDH
Site Assessment Information Directory (SAID)
Region 3 (for Microcomputers). Date of Cover-
age: October 1991.
PB93-506137/CDH See 0384
PB93-506145/CDH
Site Assessment Information Directory (SAID)
Region 4 (for Microcomputers). Date of Cover-
age: October 1991.
PB93-506145/CDH See 0385
PB93-506152/CDH
Site Assessment Information Directory (SAID)
Region 5 (for Microcomputers). Date of Cover-
age: 1991.
PB93-506152/CDH See 0386
PB93-506160/CDH
Site Assessment Information Directory (SAID)
Region 6 (for Microcomputers). Date of Cover-
age: October 1991.
PB93-506160/CDH See 0387
PB93-506178/CDH
Site Assessment Information Directory (SAID)
Region 7 (for Microcomputers). Date of Cover-
age: October 1991.
PB93-506178/CDH See 0388
PB93-506186/CDH
Site Assessment Information Directory (SAID)
Region 8 (for Microcomputers). Date of Cover-
age: 1991.
PB93-506186/CDH See 0389
PB93-506194/CDH
Site Assessment Information Directory (SAID)
Region 9 (for Microcomputers). Date of Cover-
age: October 1991.
PB93-506194/CDH See 0390
PB93-506202/CDH
Site Assessment Information Directory (SAID)
Region 10 (for Microcomputers). Date of Cov-
erage: October 1991.
PB93-506202/CDH See 0391
PB93-921100/CDH
Health Effects Assessment Summary Tables.
PB93-921100/CDH See 1052
PB93-963201
National Priorities List Sites: Alabama, 1992.
PB93-963201 See 0150
PB93-963202/CDH
National Priorities List Sites: Alaska, 1992.
PB93-963202/CDH See 0153
PB93-963203/CDH
National Priorities List Sites: The United States
Territories, 1992.
PB93-963203/CDH See 0275
PB93-963204/CDH
National Priorities List Sites: Arizona and
Nevada, 1992.
PB93-963204/CDH See 0158
PB93-963205/CDH
National Priorities List Sites: Arkansas, 1992.
PB93-963205/CDH See 0161
PB93-963206/CDH
National Priorities List Sites: California and
Hawaii, 1992.
PB93-963206/CDH See 0164
PB93-963207/CDH
National Priorities List Sites: Colorado, 1992.
PB93-963207/CDH See 0167
PB93-963208/CDH
National Priorities List Sites: Connecticut,
1992.
PB93-963208/CDH See 0170
PB93-963209/CDH
National Priorities List Sites: Delaware, 1992.
PB93-963209/CDH See 0173
PB93-963210/CDH
National Priorities List Sites: Florida, 1992.
PB93-963210/CDH See 0176
PB93-963211/CDH
National Priorities List Sites: Georgia, 1992.
PB93-963211 /CDH See 0179
PB93-963212/CDH
National Priorities List Sites:'Idaho, 1992.
PB93-963212/CDH See 0183
PB93-963213/CDH
National Priorities List Sites: Illinois, 1992.
PB93-963213/CDH See 0186
PB93-963214/CDH
National Priorities List Sites: Indiana, 1992.
PB93-963214/CDH See 0189
PB93-963215/CDH
National Priorities List Sites: Iowa, 1992.
PB93-963215/CDH See 0192
PB93-963216/CDH
National Priorities List Sites: Kansas, 1992.
PB93-963216/CDH See 0195
PB93-963217/CDH
National Priorities List Sites: Kentucky, 1992.
PB93-963217/CDH See 0198
PB93-963218/CDH
National Priorities List Sites: Louisiana, 1992.
PB93-963218/CDH See 0201
PB93-963219/CDH
National Priorities List Sites: Maine, 1992.
PB93-963219/CDH See 0204
PB93-963220/CDH
National Priorities List Sites: Maryland, 1992.
PB93-963220/CDH See 0207
PB93-963221/CDH
National Priorities List Sites: Massachusetts,
1992.
PB93-963221/CDH See 0210
PB93-963222/CDH
National Priorities List Sites: Michigan, 1992.
PB93-963222/CDH See 0213
PB93-963223/CDH
National Priorities List Sites: Minnesota, 1992.
PB93-963223/CDH See 0216
PB93-963224/CDH
National Priorities List Sites: Mississippi, 1992.
PB93-963224/CDH See 0219
PB93-963225/CDH
National Priorities List Sites: Missouri, 1992.
PB93-963225/CDH See 0222
PB93-963226/CDH
National Priorities List Sites: Montana, 1992.
PB93-963226/CDH See 0225
PB93-963227/CDH
National Priorities List Sites: Nebraska, 1992.
PB93-963227/CDH See 0228
PB93-963228/CDH
National Priorities List Sites: New Hampshire,
1992.
PB93-963228/CDH See 0231
PB93-963229/CDH
National Priorities List Sites: New Jersey, 1992.
PB93-963229/CDH See 0234
PB93-963230/CDH
National Priorities List Sites: New Mexico,
1992.
PB93-963230/CDH See 0237
PB93-963231/CDH
National Priorities List Sites: New York, 1992.
PB93-963231/CDH See 0240
PB93-963232/CDH
National Priorities List Sites: North Carolina,
1992.
PB93-963232/CDH See 0245
PB93-963233/CDH
National Priorities List Sites: North and South
Dakota, 1992.
PB93-963233/CDH See 0242
PB93-963234/CDH
National Priorities List Sites: Ohio, 1992.
PB93-963234/CDH See 0249
PB93-963235/CDH
National Priorities List Sites: Oklahoma, 1992.
PB93-963235/CDH See 0252
NU-59
-------
I!!"HI1! ...... IWir
..... tW'Si ..... r.W. .....
..... !T']R ....... F"'>Tffri! ...... w ...... !!!!'«! ..... 'ITTOBf! ...... ITWBffl^
........ I!"1" ....... IH
II1. !!! ":l " 111111 '111;:!:1 , ».' ,11 |
' •*":•! 'ill!: if ,1:..
PB93-963236/CDH
NUMBER INDEX
PB93-963236/CDH
NaUonal Priorities Ust Sites: Oregon, 1992.
PB93-963236/CDH See 0255
PB93-963237/CDH ^ '''\'[ IM™
National Priorities Ust Sites: Pennsylvania!
1992.
PB93.963237/CDH ~| ' „ §60,0258
PB»3«963238/CDH
National Priorities Ust Sites: Puerto Rico and
Virgin Islands, 1992.
PB93-963238/CDH See 0261
PB93-963239/CDH
National Priorities Ust Sites: Rhode Island,
1992.
PB93-963239/CDH See 0264
National Priorities ...... 'Ust Sites:' "South' Carolina,
1392.
PBS3-963240/GDH See 0268
PB93-963241/CDH
National Priorities Ust Sites: Tennessee, 1992.
PS83-963241/GDH See 0271
PB93-963242/CDH
National Priorities Ust Sites: Texas, 1992.
P883-963242/CDH See 0274
PB93-963243/CDH
National Priorities Ust Sites: Utah, 1992.
PB93-963243/COH See 0278
PB93-263244/CDH
National Priorities Ust Sites: Vermont, 1992.
,11, , .' . See 0281
National Priorities List Sites: Virginia, 1992.
PB93-963245/CDH See 0284
.........
,,,
__________ Priorities Ust Sites: Washington,
ilia, [[[
P893-963246/GDH See 0287
PB93-963247/CDH
National Priorities Ust Sites: West Virginia,
1982.
PB93-963247/CDH See 02|0
PB93-963248/CDH
National Priorities Ust Sites: Wisconsin, 1992.
PB93-963248/CDH See 0293
, PB|3-96i324,9ffiaH [[[
National Priorities Ust Sites: Wyoming, 1992.
PB33-9e3249/CDH See 0296
1'11 i ' "'
National Prioritios Ust Sites (1992).
PB93-963250/COH See 0297
PB93-963251/CDH
Mintor-Protega Program.
PB93-963251/CDH See 0044
on' mpementaon'of' the Superfund
Aooetorated Cleanup Model (SACM) under
CIReLAandtheNCP.
PB93.963252/COH See 0094
Ejtfrcjsing Rexibllity through the Superfund Ac-
colorated Cleanup Model (SACM).
PB93-963253/CDH See 0091
PB93-9632S4/CDH
Sopflrfimd Progress: Fall/Winter 1992.
P893-963254/CDH See 0328
PB93-963255/CDH
Sugorfund Progress. Aficionado's Version.
Progress as of September 30, 1 992.
PB93 963255/CDH See 0327
PB93-963258/CDH
Required Contracts Management Training for
Regional Superfund Personnel.
PB93-963258/CDH See 0065
"'p'B93"-963'25!9/CDH1'
Overview of the Outyear Liability Model (OLM).
PB93-963259/CDH See 0106
PB93-963261/CDH
Highlights: Superfund Program Management.
Fiscal Year 1993.
PB93-963261/CDH See 0095
PB93-963262/CDH
Status of Key SACM Program Management
Issues: Interim Guidance, Volume 1, Number 1,
December 1992.
PB93;963262/CDH See 0113
PB93-963263/CDH
Early Action and Long-Term Action under
SACM: Interim Guidance, Volume 1, Number 2,
December 1992.
PB93-963263/CDH See 0089
PB93-963264/CDH
Enforcement under SACM: Interim Guidance.
Volume 1, Numbers, December 1992.
PB93-963264/CDH See 0090
PB93-963265/CDH
Assessing Sites under SACM: Interim Guid-
ance. Volume 1, Number 4, Deccember 1992.
PB93-963265/CDH See 0084
PB93-963266/CDH
SACM Regional Decision Teams: Interim Guid-
ance. Volume 1, Number 5, December 1992.
PB93-963266/CDH See 0111
PB93-963267/CDH
'" Resources.jpf ^Preparing Independent Govern-
rherit Estimates for Remedial Contracting Work
Assignments.
PB93-963267/CDH See 0066
PB93-963268/CDH
Standard Document for Remedial Site Assess-
ment Decisions.
PB93-963268/CDH See 0392
PB93-963269/CDH
Superfund Accelerated Cleanup Bulletin: Pre-
sumptive Remedies for Municipal Landfill Sites.
Volume 2, Number 1, February 1993.
PB93-963269/CDH See 0115
PB93-963271/CDH
Compendium of Good Ideas: Models of Suc-
cess and Lessons Learned. Volume 1. High-
lights.
PB93-963271/CDH See 0133
PB93-963272/CDH
Compendium of Good Ideas: Models of Suc-
cess and Lessons Learned. Volume 2. Source
Book.
PB93-963272/CDH See 0134
PB93-963273/CDH
Quality Assurance for Superfund Environmen-
tal Data Collection Activities.
PB93-963273/CDH See 0991
PB93-963274/CDH
Superfund: EPA/ICMA Superfund Revitaliza-
tion Conference. Held in Chicago, Illinois on
November 12-13, 1992.
PB93-963274/CDH See 0319
PB93-963275/CDH
Initiatives to Streamline the Alternative Reme-
dial Contracting Strategy (ARCS) Contracts'
Award Fee Process.
PB93-963275/CDH See 0033
PB93-963276/CDH
Performance Tracking under ARCS Contracts.
PB93-963276/CDH See 0061
PB93J63278/CDH
"Amendment'to"'''Historical' Definitions of NPL
Deletion Start and Completion Dates.
PB93-963278/CDH See 0335
PB93-963279/CDH
Identification of a Senior Superfund Official for
Addressing Special NPL Site-Related Issues.
PB93-963279/CDH See 0348
PB93-963280/CDH
Guidance on Program Management Activities
under ARCS.
PB93-963280/CDH See 0026
PB9 3;963281/CDH
Clarification of Delegation to Approve Consist-
ency Exemptions at NPL Sites.
PB93-963281/CDH See 0336
PB93-963282/CDH
Use of Time and Materials and Cost Reim-
bursement Subcontracts for Remedial Actions
under the Alternative Remedial Contracting
Strategy Contracts.
PB93-963282/CDH See 1141
PB93-963283/CDH
Smart Moves in Superfund - Regional Pilots
and Initiatives. Volume 1, Number 2, Septem-
ber 1992.
PB93-963283/CDH See 0306
PB93-963284/CDH
Smart Moves in Superfund - Revitalization One
Year Later. Volume 1, Number 3, January
1993.
PB93-963284/CDH See 0307
PB93-963286/CDH
Superfund Accelerated Cleanup Model
(SACM): Questions and Answers.
PB93-963286/CDH See 0121
PB93-963289/CDH
HSED SACM Report. Volume 1, Number 1,
January 1993.
: =: PB93-963289/CDH See 0096
PB93-963290/CDH
Response Action Contractor Final Indemnifica-
tion Guidelines. Volume 2, Number 1, March
1993.
PB93-963290/CDH See 0067
PB93-963291/CDH
Further Direction on Implementing the Super-
fund Accelerated Cleanup Model (SACM).
PB93-963291/CDH See 0093
PB93-963292/CDH
Superfund Response Action Contracts.
PB93-963292/CDH See 0074
PB93-963294/CDH
Superfund Administrative Improvements. Exec:
utive Summary.
PB93-963294/CDH See 0310
PB93-963295/CDH
Superfund Administrative Improvements. Final
Report.
PB93-963295/CDH See 0311
PB93-963297/CDH
Revisions to OMB Circular A-94 on Guidelines
and Discount Rates for Benefit-Cost Analysis.
PB93-963297/CDH See 1107
PB93-963298/CDH
Superfund Reauthorization: NACEPT Subcom-
mittee Handbook.
-------
NUMBER INDEX
PB93-963420/CDH
PB93-963301
Superfund Technical Assistance Grants (Fact
Sheet).
PB93-963301 See 0503
PB93-963302
Superfund Technical Assistance Grants
(TAGs) (Pamphlet).
PB93-963302 See 0505
PB93-963304/CDH
Cost of Remedial Action Model.
PB93-963304/CDH See 1085
PB93-963305/CDH
Superfund Fact Sheet: Arsenic.
PB93-963305/CDH See 0488
PB93-963306/CDH
Superfund Fact Sheet: Exposure Pathways.
PB93-963306/CDH See 0393
PB93-963307/CDH
Superfund Fact Sheet: Trichloroethylene.
PB93-963307/CDH See 0496
PB93-963308/CDH
Superfund Fact Sheet: Benzene.
PB93-963308/CDH See 0489
PB93-963309/CDH
Superfund Fact Sheet: PCBs.
PB93-963309/CDH See 0492
PB93-963310/CDH
Superfund Fact Sheet: The Removal Program.
PB93-963310/CDH See 0495
PB93-963311/CDH
Superfund Fact Sheet An Overview.
PB93-963311 /CDH See 0487
PB93-963312/CDH
Superfund Fact Sheet: Community Interviews.
PB93-963312/CDH See 0490
PB93-963313/CDH
Superfund Fact Sheet: Public Involvement.
PB93-963313/CDH See 0493
PB93-963314/CDH
Superfund Fact Sheet: Identifying Sites.
PB93-963314/CDH See 0491
PB93-963315/CDH
Superfund Fact Sheet: The Remedial Program.
PB93-963315/CDH See 0494
PB93-963316/CDH
Specifications and Guidance for Contaminant-
Free Sample Containers.
PB93-963316/CDH See 0994
PB93-963317/CDH
Implementing the Deputy Administrator's Risk
Characterization Memorandum.
PB93-963317/CDH See 1056
PB93-963318/CDH
Cost of Remedial Actions (CORA) Model:
Overview and Applications.
PB93-963318/CDH See 1086
PB93-963323/CDH
Supplemental Guide to Video on Superfund
Site Assessment Screening: A National Priori-
ty.
PB93-963323/CDH • See 0394
PB93-963325/CDH
Permits and Permit 'Equivalency' Processes for
CERCLA On-Site Response Actions.
PB93-963325/CDH See 0435
PB93-963326/CDH
Obligation of Funds under Superfund State
Contracts.
PB93-963326/CDH See 0478
PB93-963327/CDH
NPL Construction Completion Definition at
Bioremediation and Soil Vapor Extraction Sites.
PB93-963327/CDH See 0365
PB93-963328/CDH
Compendium of ROD Language for FY 1993
Focus Areas.
PB93-963328/CDH See 1083
PB93-963329/CDH
Technology Selection Guide for Wood Treater
Sites.
PB93-963329/CDH See 1122
PB93-963333/CDH
Guidance on Setting Priorities for NPL Candi-
date Sites.
PB93-963333/CDH See 0344
PB93-963334/CDH
ATSDR Health Consultations under CERCLA.
PB93-963334/CDH See 1018
PB93-963336/CDH
Ensuring the Adequacy of Cost Share Provi-
sions In Superfund State Contracts.
PB93-963336/CDH See 0472
PB93-963338/CDH
Discussions with the Public Concerning NPL
Listings.
PB93-963338/CDH See 0339
PB93-963339/CDH
Presumptive Remedy for CERCLA Municipal
Landfill Sites.
PB93-963339/CDH See 1105
PB93-963341/CDH
Integrating Removal and Remedial Site As-
sessment Investigations.
PB93-963341/CDH See 0939
PB93-963342/CDH
PA Review Checklist.
PB93-963342/CDH See 0366
PB93-963343/CDH
Evaluation of the Likelihood of DNAPL Pres-
ence at NPL Sites: National Results.
PB93-963343/CDH See 1448
PB93-963345/CDH
Presumptive Remedies: Policy and Procedures.
PB93-963345/CDH See 1103
PB93-963346/CDH
Presumptive Remedies: Site Characterization
and Technology Selection for CERCLA Sites
with Volatile Organic Compounds in Soils.
PB93-963346/CDH See 1104
PB93-963347/CDH
Site Assessment: Evaluating Risks at Super-
fund Sites.
PB93-963347/CDH See 1076
PB93-963348/CDH
Guide to Community Involvement for Site As-
sessment Managers.
PB93-963348/CDH See 0476
PB93-963349/CDH
ROD Annual Report, FY 1992.
PB93-963349/CDH See 1115
PB93-963350/CDH
FACT BOOK: National Priorities List under the
Original Hazard Ranking System, 1981-1991.
PB93-963350/CDH See 0340
PB93-963352
Superfund Technical Assistance Grant (TAG)
Handbook: Applying for Your Grant.
PB93-963352 See 0500
PB93-963353
Superfund Technical Assistance Grant (TAG)
Handbook: The Application Forms with Instruc-
tions.
PB93-963353 See 0501
PB93-963356/CDH
Hazard Ranking System Guidance Manual.
PB93-963356/CDH See 0347
PB93-963360/CDH
Use of IRIS Values in Superfund Risk Assess-
ment.
PB93-963360/CDH See 1081
PB93-963401/CDH
OSWER Integrated Health and Safety Stand-
ard Operating Practices.
PB93-963401/CDH See 0921
PB93-963402/CDH
Guidance on Conducting Non-Time-Critical Re-
moval Actions under CERCLA.
PB93-963402/CDH See 1005
PB93-963408/CDH
Facility Response Plans.
PB93-963408/CDH See 0929
PB93-963409/CDH
Understanding Oil Spills and Oil Spill Re-
sponse.
PB93-963409/CDH See 0978
PB93-963410/CDH
Expedited Response Actions.
PB93-963410/CDH See 1003
PB93-963411/CDH
Questions and Answers on Release Notifica-
tion Requirements and Reportabie Quantity
Adjustments.
PB93-963411 /CDH See 1149
PB93-963412/CDH
Guidance for Federal Facilities on Release No-
tification Requirements under CERCLA and
SARA Title ill.
PB93-963412/CDH See 0898
PB93-963413/CDH
Guidance on Implementation of the 'Contribute
to Remedial Performance' Provision.
PB93-963413/CDH See 1093
PB93-963414/CDH
Health and Safety Plan (HASP) User's Guide
(Version 3.0/4.0).
PB93-963414/CDH See 0917
PB93-963415/CDH
Field Certification Tracking System (FCTS).
User's Guide. Version 2.1.
PB93-963415/CDH See 0909
PB93-963416/CDH
Determination of Imminent and Substantial En-
dangerment for Removal Actions.
PB93-963416/CDH See 1000
PB93-963418/CDH
Emergency Responders Agreements for Fund-
Lead Remedial Actions.
PB93-963418/CDH See 1001
PB93-963419/CDH
Effect of OSHA's Bloodborne Pathogens
Standard on Hazardous Waste Cleanup Activi-
ties.
PB93-963419/CDH See 1026
PB93-963420/CDH
Personal Air Sampling and Air Monitoring Re-
quirements under 29 CFR 1910.120.
PB93-963420/CDH See 0922
NU-61
-------
PB93-963422/CDH
NUMBER INDEX
PB93-963422/CDH
Conducting Non-Tima-Crftical Removal Actions
under CERCLA.
PS93.963422/CDH See 0999
PB93-963424/CDH
Soperfund Qukle: Rsportable Quantity Adjust-
ment for Methyl Isocyanate (MIC).
P883.963424/COH See 1152
PB93-963425/CDH
Superfund Guide: Clean Air Act Hazardous Air
fojutarjts, Add, odjpjhe, List of CERCLA Haz-
.. 93:9634??/CDli ................... See 1151
' '' ....... "'"' .......
PB93-963609/CDH
Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Cleanup
Efforts Nationwide, Spring 1993 (French Limit-
ed Site Profile, Harris County, Texas).
PB93-963609/CDH See 0954
PB93-963610/CDH
Revised Policy on Discretionary Information
Release under CERCLA.
PB93-963610/CDH See 0600
PB93-963611/CDH
Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Cleanup
Efforts Nationwide, Spring 1993 (Powersville
Site Prpfije, Peach County, Georgia).
PB93-9636il/CbH See 0958
" ^assignment of CtP "Transportation" Func- PB93-963612/CDH
P893-963501/CDH See 0063
PB93-963502/CDH
Extending' the Tracking of Analytical Services
fiV Potentially Responsible Party-Lead Super-
fund Sites (Supplemental Guidance on
OSWER Directive 9240.0-2A).
P893«963502/CDH See 0986
PB93:963506/CPH
Summary of GIS Support to Superfund.
P693:963506/CDH See 1307
PB93-963507/CDH
Guidance for Evaluating the Technical Imprac-
Ueabiity of Ground-Water Restoration.
Pl93.963507/GpH See 1460
PBlS-9l3508/CpH" ..... ~ "",""' , """'„! "!,,,', ......
Distribution of DRAFT Soil Screening Level
Guidance,
PBS3.963508/CDH See 1500
PB93-963601/CDH
Suporfund at Work; Hazardous Waste Cleanup
Efforts Nationwide, Winter 1993. (Wells G and
H Site, Woburn, Massachusetts).
PB93-96360i/CDH See 0972
PBjn-963602/CDH .....................................
EnfofOermmt Project Management Handbook.
PB93-963602/COH See 0533
PB93-963603/COH
Suporiund at Work: Hazardous Waste Cleanup
Efforts Nationwide, Spring 1993 (Triana/Ten-
n«»se« Rivar Site, Alabama).
P893 063G-33/CDH See 0960
PB93-963604/CDH
Report to Congress: Settlements with Munici-
pal Waste Generators and Transporters Since
1991 undar the Comprehensive Environmental
Hfiponse. Compensation, and Liability Act of
1980.
P893-963604/CDH See 0596
PB93-963605/CDH
Modal Administrative Order on Consent for Re-
moval Actions,
PB93-963605/COH See 0574
PB13-963606/QDH '. ...... I ......... I ..... ' '!'.!!'
likW; Unf ataral Administrative Order" for Re-
i rtxjval Response Activities.
P893-963606/COH See 0579
Sgpwfurtd at Wor Hazardous Waste Cleanup
Efforts Nattonwkte, Spring 1993 (United
Chroma Products Site Profile).
PB83-963607/CDH See 0961
PBS3-963608/CDH
Sujwfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Cleanup
EWorts Nationwide, Spring 1993 (Old Midland
Products Site Profile, Yell County, Arkansas).
PB03-96360a/COH See 0957
Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Cleanup
Efforts Nationwide, Spring 1993 (Radium
Chemical Site Profile, Queens, New York).
PB93-963612/CDH See 0959
PB93-963614/CDH
Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Cleanup
Efforts Nationwide, Spring 1993 (Harvey and
Knott Drum Site, New Castle County, Dela-
ware).
PB93-963614/CDH See 0956
PB93-963615/CDH
Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Cleanup
Efforts Nationwide, Summer 1993 (Tri-State
Plating Site Profile, Columbus, Indiana).
PB93-963615/CDH See 0970
PB93-963616/CDH
Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Cleanup
Efforts Nationwide, Spring 1993 (Fulton Termi-
nals Site Profile, Oswego County, NY).
PB93-963616/CDH See 0955
PB93-963617/CDH
Streamlined Approach for Settlements with De
Minimis Waste Contributors under CERCLA
Section 122(g)(1)(A).
PB93-963617/CDH See 0870
PB93-963618/CPH
Supplemental Guidance on Federal Superfund
Liens.
PB93-963618/CDH See 0885
PB93-963619/CDH
Guidance on CERCLA Settlements with De Mi-
cromis Waste Contributors.
PB93-963619/CDH See 0547
PB93-963620/CPH
New Policy on Performance of Risk Assess-
ments during Remedial Investigation Feasibility
Studies (RI/FS) Conducted by Potentially Re-
sponsible Parties (PRPs).
PB93-963620/CDH See 1061
PB93-963626/CDH
Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Cleanup
Efforts Nationwide, Summer 1993 (Fike/Artel
Chemical Site Profile, Nitro, West Virginia).
PB93-963626/CDH See 0967
PB93-963627/CDH
Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Cleanup
Efforts Nationwide, Summer 1993 (Army Creek
Landfill Site Profile, New Castle, Delaware).
, PB93-963627/CPH , §66,0,992
PB93-9636287CDH
Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Cleanup
Efforts Nationwide, Summer 1993 (Eastern Di-
versified Metals Site Profile, Schuylkill County,
Pennsylvania).
PB93-963628/CDH See 0966
PB93-963629/CDH
Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Cleanup
Efforts Nationwide, Summer 1993 (Rogue
Valley/Ditch Creek Ranch Site Profile, Wimer,
Oregon).
PB93-963629/CDH See 0969
PB93-963631/CDH
Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Cleanup
Efforts Nationwide, Summer 1993 (Common
Steps in the Removal Process).
PB93-963631/CDH See 0965
PB94-100161/CDH
Hydraulic Fracturing Technology: Technology
Evaluation Report and Application Analysis
Report.
PB94-100161/CDH See 1265
PB94-101797/CDH
Engineering Bulletins: Aids to the Development
of Remedial Alternatives.
PB94-101797/CDH See 1236
PB94-101805/CDH
SITE Demonstration of the Basic Extractive
Sludge Treatment Process.
PB94-101805/CDH See 1300
PB94-102407/CDH
Design Considerations for Ambient Air Monitor-
ing at Superfund Sites. Engineering Bulletin.
PB94-102407/CDH See 1402
PB94-105426/CDH
Engineering Bulletin: Landfill Covers.
PB94-105426/CDH See 1233
PB94-105434/CDH
Resources Conservation Company B.E.S.T.
(Trade Name) Solvent Extraction Technology:
Application Analysis Report.
PB94-105434/CDH See 1294
PB94-106333/CDH
Solidification/Stabilization of Organics and In-
organics.
PB94-106333/CDH See 1561
PB94-110517/CDH
Options for Developing and Evaluating Mitiga-
tion Strategies for Indoor Air Impacts at
CERCLA Sites. Air/Superfund National Techni-
cal Guidance Study Series, Report ASF-36.
PB94-110517/CDH See 1415
PB94-112307/CDH
Bioremediation Resource Guide and Bioreme-
diation Resource Matrix.
PB94-J12307/CPH , r See 1425
PB94-112349/CDH
Issues Paper on Radiation Site Cleanup Regu-
lations.
PB94-112349/CDH See 1280
PB94-112828/CDH
Will Soil Working Work for the Sand Creek
Superfund Site.
PB94-112828/CDH See 1548
PB94-112836/CDH
Comparison of Organic Emissions from Haz-
ardous Waste Incinerators versus the 1990
Toxic Release Inventory Air Releases.
PB94-112836/CDH See 1397
PB94-114659/CDH,, „
Operations and Research at the U.S. EPA In-
cineration Research Facility: Annual Report for
FY92.
PB94-114659/CDH See 1485
PB94-117439/CDH
Accutech Pneumatic Fracturing Extraction and
Hot Gas Injection, Phase 1. Applications Analy-
sis Report.
PB94-117439/CDH See 1190
NU-62
-------
NUMBER INDEX
PB94-963204/CDH
PB94-117470/CDH
Guide for Conducting Treatability Studies
under CERCLA: Biodegradation Remedy Se-
lection. Interim Guidance.
PB94-117470/CDH See 1159
PB94-120045/CDH
BioGenesis (Trade Name) Soil Washing Tech-
nology: Innovative Technology Evaluation
Report.
PB94-120045/CDH See 1490
PB94-121688/CDH
Ground-Water Issue: Potential Sources of Error
in Ground-Water Sampling at Hazardous
Waste Sites.
PB94-121688/CDH See 1456
PB94-123858/CDH
Superfund Innovative Technology Evaluation
Program: Technology Profiles, Sixth Edition.
PB94-123858/CDH See 1318
PB94-123874/CDH
Superfund Innovative Technology Evaluation
Program: Annual Report to Congress 1992.
PB94-123874/CDH See 1309
PB94-124039/CDH
Pilot-Scale Demonstration of a Slurry-Phase Bi-
ological Reactor for Creosote-Contaminated
Soil. Applications Analysis Report.
PB94-124039/CDH See 1426
PB94-124658/CDH
CWM PO*WW*ER (Trade Name) Evaporation-
Catalytic Oxidation Technology: Applications
Analysis Report.
PB94-124658/CDH See 1225
PB94-124674/CDH
Toronto Harbour Commissioners (THC) Soil
Recycle Treatment Train. Applications Analysis
Report.
PB94-124674/CDH See 1544
PB94-130747/CDH
Application of 'Real-Time' Monitoring in Deci-
sion Making: The New Bedford Harbor Pilot
Dredging Project.
PB94-130747/CDH See 1574
PB94-131646/CDH
Membrane Treatment of Wood Preserving Site
Groundwater by SBP Technologies, Inc. Appli-
cations Analysis Report.
PB94-131646/CDH See 1468
PB94-134376/CDH
Potential Sources of Error in Ground-Water
Sampling at Hazardous Waste Sites. Ground
Water Issue.
PB94-134376/CDH See 1472
PB94-135118/CDH
Treatment of Nonhazardous Petroleum-Con-
taminated Soils by Thermal Desorption Tech-
nologies.
PB94-135118/CDH See 1547
PB94-136264/CDH
Technology Evaluation Report: SITE Program
Demonstration. EPA RREL's Mobile Volume
Reduction Unit.
PB94-136264/CDH See 1348
PB94-136678/CDH
Meeting Summary: National Advisory Council
on Environmental Policy and Technology (1st).
Subcommittee on Radiation Cleanup Regula-
tion. Held in Washington, DC. on October 18-
19,1993.
PB94-136678/CDH See 1059
PB94-137353/CDH
Advanced Oxidation Technologies for the
Treatment of Contaminated Groundwater.
PB94-137353/CDH See 1429
PB94-138815/CDH
Methods for Evaluating the Attainment of
Cleanup Standards. Volume 2. Ground Water.
PB94-138815/CDH See 1469
PB94-138948/CDH
EPA/Navy CERCLA Remedial Action Technol-
ogy Guide.
PB94-138948/CDH See 1241
PB94-140613/CDH
Literature Review Summary of Metals Extrac-
tion Processes Used to Remove Lead from
Soils.
PB94-140613/CDH See 1518
PB94-141652/CDH
BEN: A Model to Calculate the Economic Ben-
efits of Noncompliance. User's Manual (Re-
vised).
PB94-141652/CDH See 1205
PB94-141678/CDH
CASHOUT User's Manual for Superfund.
PB94-141678/CDH See 0515
PB94-144136/CDH
Guide for Conducting Treatability Studies
under CERCLA: Biodegradation Remedy Se-
lection. Quick Reference Fact Sheet.
PB94-144136/CDH See 1160
PB94-144250/CDH
EPA Engineering Issue: Technology Alterna-
tives for the Remediation of PCB-Contaminat-
ed Soil and Sediment.
PB94-144250/CDH See 1501
PB94-144540/CDH
Accessing Federal Data Bases for Contaminat-
ed Site Clean-Up Technologies (Third Edition).
PB94-144540/CDH See 1185
PB94-146495/CDH
Abstracts of Phase 1 and Phase 2 Awards:
Small Business Innovation Research Program
1991.
PB94-146495/CDH See 0016
PB94-149879/CDH
Tech Trends: The Applied Technologies Jour-
nal for Superfund Removals and Remedial Ac-
tions and RCRA Corrective Actions, December
1993.
PB94-149879/CDH See 1332
PB94-155256/CDH
Sorption, Important in Stabilized/Solidified
Waste Forms.
PB94-155256/CDH See 1563
PB94-157765/CDH
Evaluation of Unsaturated/Valdose Zone
Models for Superfund Sites.
PB94-157765/CDH See 1449
PB94-157773/CDH
Identification and Compilation of Unsaturated/
Vadose Zone Models.
PB94-157773/CDH See 1464
PB94-159092/CDH
Annual RREL Research Symposium (20th) Ab-
stract Proceedings. Held in Cincinnati, Ohio on
March 15-17, 1994.
PB94-159092/CDH See 1184
PB94-160603/CDH
Thermal Desorption Treatment (February
1994).
PB94-160603/CDH See 1487
PB94-160637/CDH
Chemical Waste Management, Inc.
PO*WW*ER (Trade Name) Evaporation-Cata-
lytic Oxidation Technology. Technology Eval-
uation Report. Volume 1.
PB94-160637/CDH See 1213
PB94-160660/CDH
Chemical Waste Management, Inc.
PO*WW*ER (Trade Name) Evaporation-Cata-
lytic Oxidation Technology. Technology Evalu-
tion Report. Volume 2.
PB94-160660/CDH See 1214
PB94-162716/CDH
Potential Surrogate Metals for Incinerator Trial
Burns.
PB94-162716/CDH See 1486
PB94-162740/CDH
Remediation of Contaminated Soils by Solvent
Flushing.
PB94-162740/CDH See 1529
PB94-163532/CDH
Engineered Biofilter for Removing Organic
Contaminants in Air.
PB94-163532/CDH See 1403
PB94-500642/CDH
Inorganic Contract Compliance Screening
System (ICCSS) Software (ILM02.1 Version 4)
(for Microcomputers).
PB94-500642/CDH See 0038
PB94-500998/CDH
BEN Model: Calculates Violators' Economic
Benefits from Noncompliance (Version 4.0) (for
Microcomputers).
PB94-500998/CDH See 0514
PB94-501012/CDH
CASHOUT Model: Calculates Current Value of
Superfund Cleanup Costs (Version 1.2) (for
Microcomputers).
PB94-501012/CDH See 1208
PB94-501335/CDH
Organic Contract Compliance Screening
System (OCCSS) Software (OLM01.8 Version
6) (for Microcomputers).
PB94-501335/CDH See 0053
PB94-501467/CDH
Inorganic Contract Compliance Screening
System (ICCSS) Software (ILM02.1 Version 5)
(for Microcomputers).
PB94-501467/CDH See 0039
PB94-780012/CDH
Instructional Package on Regulatory Air Quality
Modeling. Part 1: Videos on the 'Guideline on
Air Quality Models (Revised)' and the Model
Clearinghouse (Video).
PB94-780012/CDH See 1412
PB94-921100/CDH
Health Effects Assessment Summary Tables.
PB94-921100/CDH See 1053
PB94-963201/CDH
Superfund Accelerated Cleanup Model (SACM)
Coordination Strategy.
PB94-963201/CDH See 0120
PB94-963202/CDH
Superfund: EPA/ICMA Superfund Revitaliza-
tion Conference. Held in San Francisco, Cali-
fornia on February 1-2, 1993.
PB94-963202/CDH See 0320
PB94-963203/CDH
Data Quality Objectives Process for Superfund:
Interim Final Guidance.
PB94-963203/CDH See 0983
PB94-963204/CDH
Data Quality Objectives Process for Superfund:
Workbook.
PB94-963204/CDH See 0984
NU-63
-------
PB94-963205/CDH
1 Illttili!- •'! , ,- :,'•> ''(..' 1 • ..... jih! ; jRI
PB94-963205/CDH
Data O^Sty effectives Process for Superfund.
Superfund Program and Information Manage-
ment Update. Volume 1, Number 1, November
Pl34*-9632d8/CDH'
PB94-9S3209/CDH
NACEPT Materials for Meeting Held on Sep-
tember 20-21,1993.
P894-963209/CDH See 0143
on "Worst Sites' arid 'NPL
Sites' to Assist In SACM Implementa-
<9fl-
PB84463206/C0H See 0083
PB84-963207/CDH
Data Quality Objectives Process for Superfund.
PB94J63207/CDH See 0982
' [[[
See 0123
rtund Administrative Improvements: Rein-
Superfund.
i-9632iO/CQH Sea 0312
PB84-863211/CDH
..... ®SiR,SfflrBS?sIPe(Srn™ndat'<>ns jp, Ad-
rSnfsUatof Browner. ........
PB94-96321 1 /CDH See 0142
PB94-S63214/CDH
Ffroceduras to Ensure that CLP Laboratories
Ars Not Patd for Non-Compliant or Unuseable
D*ta.
PB94;963214/CipH See 0062
PBiI-9i321S/CDH .........................................
Ovorvtow' of trie Outyear Liability Model (OLM).
PS84-963215/CDH See 0107
PB94-963216/CDH
Status of Regional Superfund Pilots: End-of-
Y««r Report.
PS94.963218/COH See 0309
PB94-863217/CDH
Superfund Revitafeation: Measures of Suc-
cess.
PB94-963217/CDH See 0334
PBS4-963219/CDH
Expectations for Full Implementation of SACM.
P884-963219/COH S??.P092
PB94-&63220/CDH
Suporfund Program Implementation Manual,
Ftocal Year 1994. Volume 1. Program Goals
«Bxl PtannJng Requirements. Volume 2. Pro-
gram Implementation Procedures.
PB94-963220/CDH See 0124
PB94-963221/CDH
National Superfund Program Priorities, Fiscal
Year 1934.
PB94-963221/CDH See 0298
PB94-963222/CDH
Dlta Quality Objoctives Decision Error Feasi-
bltty Trials (DEFT) Beta Version 1.01. User's
Guide,
PB94.963222/COH See 0979
PB94-963232/CDH
Audit Management Process. Reference Guide.
PB94-963232/CDH See 0085
PB94-963233/CDH
SRtS System Overview and User's Guide.
PB94-963233/CDH See 01 12
NUMBER INDEX
PB94-963234/CDH
Progress Toward Implementing Superfund,
Fiscal Year 1991. Report to Congress.
PB94-983234/CDH. See 0302
PB94-963238/CDH
NACEPT Meeting. Held in Crystal City, Virginia
on February 11,1994.
PB94-963238/CDH See 0144
PB94-963239/CDH
Superfund Reform Act of 1994.
PB94-963239/CDH See 0332
PB94-963243/CDH
Procedure for Use of USAGE Preplaced Con-
tracts to Expedite Superfund Cleanup Tasks.
PB94-963243/CDH See 1131
PB94-963245/CDH
Superfund Strategic Plan and Implementation
Strategy Fiscal Year 1994.
PB94-963245/CDH See 0126
PB94-963246/CDH
Superfund Strategic Plan and Implementation
Strategy Rscal Year 1994: Office and Division
Plans.
PB94-963246/CDH See 0127
PB94-963247/CDH
Superfund Program Management Manual,
Rscal Year 1994.
PB94-963247/CDH See 0073
PB94-963249/CDH
Military Base Closures: Guidance on EPA Con-
currence in the Identification of Uncontaminat-
ed Parcels under CERCLA Section 120(h)(4).
PB94-963249/CDH See 0899
PB94-963501/CDH
USEPA Contract Laboratory Program National
Functional Guidelines for Organic Data
Review.
PB94-963501/CDH See 0077
PB94-963502/CDH
USEPA Contract Laboratory Program National
Functional Guidelines for Inorganic Data
Review.
PB94-963502/CDH See 0997
PB94-963503/CDH
Technical Background Document for Draft Soil
Screening Level Guidance.
PB94-963503/CDH See 1537
PB94-963601/CDH
Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Cleanup
Efforts Nationwide, Fall 1993 (Brown Wood
Preserving Site Profile, Suwanee County, Flori-
da).
PB94-963601/CDH See 0950
PB94-963602/CDH
Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Cleanup
Efforts Nationwide, Fall 1993 (Johns-Manville
Site Profile, Illinois).
PB94-963602/CDH See 0952
PB94-963604/CDH
Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Cleanup
Efforts Nationwide, Fall 1993 (Bunker Hill Site
Profile, Silver Valley, Northern Idaho).
PB94-963604/CDH See 0951
PB94-983606/CDH
First 125 De Minimis Settlements: Statistics
from EPA's De Minimis Database.
PB94-963606/CDH See 0543
PB94-963607/CDH
Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Cleanup
Efforts Nationwide, Summer 1993 (Chisman
Creek Site Profile, York County, Virginia).
'" • PB94-963607/CDH See 0963
PB94-963608/CDH
Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Cleanup
Efforts Nationwide, Fall 1993 (Big D Camp-
ground Site Profile, Ashtabula County, Kings-
ville, Ohio).
PB94-963608/CDH See 0949
PB94-963609/CDH
Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Cleanup
Efforts Nationwide, Summer 1993 (Coal Creek
Site Profile, Chehalis, Washington).
PB94-963609/CDH See 0964
PB94-963610/CDH
Superfund and Small Waste Contributors.
PB94-963610/CDH
See 0881
PB94-963611/CDH
Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Cleanup
Efforts Nationwide, Summer 1993 (Northside
Landfill Site Profile, Spokane, Washington).
PB94-963611 /CDH See 0968
PB94-963612/CDH
Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Cleanup
Efforts Nationwide, Winter 1994 (Seymour Re-
cycling Site Profile, Seymour, Indiana).
PB94-963612/CDH See 0975
PB94-963613/CDH
Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Cleanup
Efforts Nationwide, Winter 1994 (Bailey Waste
Disposal Site Profile, Texas).
PB94-963613/CDH See 0973
PB94-963614/CDH
Roles and Responsibilities of Regional Project
Officers, Zone Project Officers, Work Assign-
ment Managers and Contracting Officers for
the RCRA Enforcement, Permitting and Assist-
ance Contracts (REPA).
PB94-963614/CDH See 0070
PB94-963615/CDH
Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Cleanup
Efforts Nationwide, Winter 1994 (New Brighton
Site Profile, Minneapolis/St. Paul, Minnesota).
PB94-963615/CDH See 0974
RCN-258-040-27-03
Air/Superfund National Technical Guidance
Study Series. Database of Emission Rate
Measurement Projects.
PB91-222059/CDH See 1379
REPT-15-13GO-00
Endangerment Assessment Handbook.
PB92-102144/CDH See 0530
TETRAT-TC-3218-10
Commencement Bay Nearshore/Tideflats Fea-
sibility Study. Executive Summary.
PB93-181220/CDH See 1579
TETRAT-TC-3218-VOL-1
Commencement Bay Nearshore/Tideflats Fea-
sibility Study. Volume 1.
PB93-181238/CDH See 1580
TETRAT-TC-3218-VOL-2
Commencement Bay Nearshore/Tideflats Fea-
sibility Study. Volume 2. Appendices.
PB93-181246/CDH See 1581
USGS/WRI-89-4081
Hydrogeology and Results of Aquifer Tests in
the Vicinity of a Hazardous-Waste Disposal
Site Near Byron, Illinois.
PB90-130188/CDH See 1463
NU-64
-------
NTIS Price Schedules
NTIS generally uses price codes to indicate the cost of items sold. The following schedules convert these
codes into actual prices.
For Customers in the U.S., Canada,
and Mexico
Standard Prices
"A" Codes
Price
Code Price
*A01 $6.00
*A02 9.00
A03 17.50
A04thruA05 19.50
A06thruA09 27.00
A10thruA13 36.50
A14thruA17 44.50
A18thruA21 52.00
A22thruA25 61.00
A99 Contact NTIS
for price
"N" Codes
Price
Code
N01
N02
N03
Price
. $65
... 59
... 20
:A01 for microfiche is $9.00
A02 for microfiche is $12.50
Microcomputer
Diskettes
"D" Codes
Price
Code
D01
D02
DOS
D04
D05
D06
D07
DOS
D09
D10
D11
D12
D13
D14
D15
D16
D17
D18
Price
$55
..90
, 140
, 195
. 250
. 300
. 360
. 410
. 460
. 520
. 570
. 630
. 680
. 740
. 790
. 840
. 890
. 950
Exception Prices
"E" Codes
Price
Code Price
E01 $12.50
E02 15.50
EOS 17.50
E04 20.50
EOS 22.50
E06 25.50
E07 28.50
EOS 32.00
E09 35.00
E10 38.00
E11 41.00
E12 45.00
E13 48.00
£14 52.00
E15 56.00
E16 62.00
E17 67.00
E18 72.00
E19 80.00
E20 92.00
E99 Contact NTIS
for price
Magnetic Tape
"T" Codes
Price
Code
T01
T02
T03
T04
T05
T06
T07
T08
D19 1,000
D99 Contact NTIS
for price
Price
$180
.. 240
.. 360
.. 480
.. 590
... 710
... 820
... 940
T09 1,050
T10 1,160
T11 1,270
T12 1,390
T13 1,500
T14 1,620
T15 1,740
T16 1,850
T17 1,960
T18 2,080
T19 2,190
T99 Contact NTIS
for price
For Customers outside the U.S.,
Canada, and
Standard Prices
"A" Codes
Price
Code
*A01
*A02
A03
A04 thru A05
A06 thru A09
A10thruA13
A14thruA17
A18thruA21
A22thruA25
Mexico
Exception Prices
"E" Codes
Price
Price Code
.... $12 E01
18 E02
35 E03
39 E04
54 £05
73 E06
89 E07
104 E08
122 E09
A99 ContactNTIS E10
"N" Codes
Price
Code
N01
N02
N03
*A01 for microfiche
for price E11
E12
E13
Price £1 4
$85 E15
75 E16
40 E17
E18
E19
is $18.00 E20
A02 for microfiche is $25.00 E99
Microcomputer
Diskettes
"D" Codes
Price
Code
D01
D02
DOS
D04
D05
D06
D07
DOS
D09
D10
D11
D12
D13
D14
D15
D16
D17
D18
D19
Magnetic Tape
"T" Codes
Price
Code
Price T01
....$110 T02
180 T03
280 T04
390 T05
500 T06
600 T07
720 T08
820 T09
920 T10
... 1,040 T11
...1,140 T12
...1,260 T13
... 1,360 T14
...1,480 T15
...1,580 T16
...1,680 T17
...1,780 T18
... 1,900 T19
... 2,000 T99
D99 ContactNTIS
for price
Price
$25
31
35
41
45
51
57
64
70
76
82
90
96
104
112
124
134
144
160
184
ContactNTIS
for price
Price
$360
480
720
960
1,180
1,420
1,640
1,880
2,100
2,320
2,540
2,780
3,000
3,240
3,480
3,700
3,920
4,160
4,380
Contact NTIS
for price
Prices are subject to change
Effective 7/1/94
-------
: Hi K i
I (!•
-------
0)
(0
8
O.
NTIS, Order Form
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Technology Administration
National Technical Information Service
Springfield, VA 22161
Ship to Address
Date .
(703) 487-4650
or FAX this form to (703) 321-8547
To verify receipt of your FAX order,
call (703) 487-4679.
For Rush Service—Call 1-800-553-NTIS
Rush service is available for an additional fee.
To order subscriptions, call (703) 487-4630.
TDD (For hearing impaired only), call (703) 487-4639.
Payment
WT or TYPE
Company
Attention
Last Name
Suite or Room Number
Title
First Initial
D Charge my NTIS Deposit Account . —
Charge my D [•••I
Account No. I I I I I
Exp. Cardholder's name
J |
Full Street Address Required
(Please print)
(Required to validate all orders)
] Check/Money order enclosed for $_
City
State
ZIP
Telephone number
Fax number
(Payable in U.S. dollars)
D Bill me #—Add $7.50 per order if full payment does not
accompany order. Purchase orders accepted only from
government agencies, educational institutions, or corporations
in the U.S., Canada & Mexico.
DTIC Users Code
Contract No.
Last six digits
Return Policy:
Although NTIS cannot accept returns for credit or refund, we will
gladly replace any item you requested if we made an error in filling
your order, if the item was defective, or if you received it in a
damaged condition. Just call our Customer Service Department at
(703) 487-4660.
Order Selection
Enter NTIS order numbers
(Ordering by title alone will delay your order)
U, 1- CDH
>: 2. CDH
5 3. CDH
£ 4. CDH
£ 5. CDH
$ 6. CDH
ra
£ 7. CDH
8. CDH
*NTIS will label each item with up to eight
characters of your organization's routing
code.
Prices are subject to change.
The NTIS Sales Desk (703) 487-4650
can provide pricing verification.
PR-OFA7/94
All previous versions of this order form .
are obsolete.
Customer
Routing*
optional
(up to 8 digits)
Unit
Price
Quantity
Paper
Copy
Micro-
fiche
Value of Order Handling Fee
$10.00 or less $2.00
$10.01 -$50.00 $4.00
$50.01 -$100.00 $6.00
Over $100.00 $8.00
Add $2.00 to above for orders sent
outside of the U.S., Canada, and Mexico.
Other
Specify density
for tape orders
1600bpi
6250 bpi
3480
cartridge
Internat'l
Air Mail
Fee
(see reverse)
SUBTOTAL from other side
Total
Handling Fee per order
(see chart at left)
Payment not included. Please bill me, add $7.50
(Available for U.S., Canada, and Mexico only)
GRAND TOTAL
TOTAL
PRICE
| | OVER — Order continued on reverse
-------
Order Selection (cont.)
NTIS
, , ,.. ,
Enter NTIS order numbers
(Ordering by title alone will delay your order)
9. ! ,', ;;; ; ,i ' '.;'.' cbri
10, CDH
11. CDH
12. CDH
13. CDH
14. CDH
15. CDH
16. CDH
17. CDH
18. CDH
19. CDH
20. CDH
Customer
Routing*
(up to 8 digits)
Unit
Price
Quantity
Paper
Copy
Micro-
fiche
Other
•:,
i
Specify density
for tape orders
1600 bpi
6250 bpi
!
3480
cartridge
Internat'l
Air Mail
(see below)
:, :.': , : ,~, '— : ::• • :.,:: -".: :":. :: :• ' , ' :,' : ;• "• '•:".".".. " " 1 • ' ':' : :" ,• "
'NTIS will label each item with up to eight characters of your organization's routing code. Subtotal
TOTAL
PRICE
UJ
ou
EC
0.
flj
w
to
C)
cu
EA/7E/J on the other side.
FREE Catalogs & Information
Call (703) 487-4650 and ask for any of the following free
titles or check the appropriate box below.
Q PR-827 - NTIS Products & Services Catalog
Q PR-186- Published Search* Master Catalog
Q PR:261 - Directory of U.S. Government Software for
Mainframes and Microcomputers
Q PR-629- Directory of U.S. Government Datafiles for
Mainframes and Microcomputers
Q PR-746- Directory of Federal Laboratory & Technology
Resources
Q PR-758- Environmental Datafiles & Software Catalog
Q PR-797- NTIS A!erts-(fprrnerly Abstract Newsletters)
customized current awareness bulletins
Q PR-868- Environmental Highlights (catalog of reports on the
environment)
Q PR-888- CD-ROMs & Optical Discs Available From NTIS
Q PR-936- FedWqrtdf — Free Access to the Electronic Market-
place of U.S. and Foreign Government Information
International Shipping —~~»._.
Paper copy reports and microfiche copies are shipped surface
mail unless Air Mail is requested.
!*•' Air Mail"Fees'" ' '
Canada and Mexico add $4 per paper copy report;
$1 per microfiche copy.
Other countries add $8 per paper copy report;
$1.25 per microfiche copy.
Computer products are shipped by air courier as part of the
regular handling fee.
For a copy of the latest NTIS price code conversion table,
call (703) 487-4650 and ask for PR-360-3 for prices in the
U.S., Canada and Mexico. Ask for PR-360-4 for the
conversion table for prices for all other countries.
After the original stock of a technical report is exhausted, NTIS
reprints directly from the master archive copy. These printed-to-
order copies are the best possible reproductions.
For more order forms, call (703) 487-4650 and ask for PR-OFA.
-------
-------
F"1''!!1111:'"1;1'':* ..... • ..... W ......... i ........... F5 ..... iW
..... H" ...... F ......... W ..... Ti!l:W ..... ........ Pfl! .......... "!!! ........ ..... ! ...... '''"If"? ...... ill1' ............ ! ...... Eli'"' ........... !!!! ...... I ..... ?! ........ '••K>5:
"TO
1
-------
Stay Current with Government
Environmental Issues
and Technologies
Subscribe to current awareness bulletin—
NTIS Alerts on Environmental Pollution & Control
If you need to keep current with the
latest research and studies concerning
the environment, NTIS Alerts on
Environmental Pollution & Control makes
it easy.
This bulletin gives you - twice a month
- summaries of reports on all the latest
U.S. and foreign government-sponsored
studies and research. You can
familiarize yourself with the broad base
of information that's available and zero
in on exactly those reports that will
keep you up to date.
Reports such as Superfund Records of
Decision (ROD), guidance manuals,
pesticide fact sheets, assessment
guidelines, EPA policy studies, pollution
control technology, and more. Plus, the
newsletter lists environment reports from
foreign sources.
The 8,000 studies announced annually in
the Alert are divided into the categories
below:
• Air pollution and control
• Noise pollution and control
• Solid waste pollution and control
• Water pollution and control
• Pesticides pollution and control
• Radiation pollution and control
• Environmental health and safety
•
NTIS, Alert
Environmental Pollution & Control
^_
*
L^
J^
May 15. 1993
Air Pollution & Control
—Foreign Technology—
y. st&iusseminar d« P8VVU zum Forschungsschwerpunfct
•WakfschiiedCti'. Proceeding*. {Second status seminar ot
the 'Bavarian Project Croup on Research into the Effect
of Environmental Pofiutants (PBWU)' on th« major
research area 'forest decline'. Proceedings).
M. fieinher, M, Kirchrver. and K. Hoessi.
^iKaentjRgszeriirum fuer Umwstt und Gesundheii G.rr:.b.H..
.-^l'yal«j"s. ptiysiot'jg&a! Kivcstiga-
tjcns and maHiematicai modellings. Data presented comprise
msasuremsnia c? air pdluiants: meteorological parameters:
vegetation investigations; vapour exchangs msasurerrients in
feaves: changes in. the fevers of sulfur co.— pounds, secondary
metaboihes. monoterpenes. phenols, nutri^ve elements
(t'^ri.K.P), crassii^saons of fofsst deciine phenoniena; root
t-^i'i.-.-.^,,, -^ijg,— .^. (,i" ' fin/wu " "
/1IIH. . J,
^flfl«^K£Z
Advanced lightweight ceramic candie filter module.
j. f. Zievsrs. and P. Eggerstedi.
laAi&tfi3i Fsner ana Pump Mfg. Co.. Cfcero. !L i9S2. 'l^i
fXH^P S?H3SJ r!B tJS Uep.vimenl fil Energtf cfmtf.icisws
systems. MorgantoWn. \W lUnited States). 15-17 Sep )S9£.
5oenEcrea by Department oi Cnerav. 'Washington. DC.
DE9300021 1/VreP Price code: PC A03/MF AOI
To deter-ipg (he c«jnO«nic '!»"«,•! t=f !«i!'i wxstfil ^sftimiCT.
severs! sizes 2? fijters were cost estimated for operation at
at?.i osi f * 5 bar) based on ihs use cf al! Snht weight ceram-
v.t (f-.two/5-d-rf.^} ws. !he u£fi cf CGfiied alley (RAaiH.'. is&f:-
sheets and s»wn .^'Md-; wmlte (Aivy/fug A Prf m^w tfa-
"~^S^K
fivery system was included in both estimates. 1 1*: Fit;tv/RbrC
system was estimated w-th the piw^iin (.ii.rajn white tn£
AE!cw/SiC system was ha-^il f«i twiticjfir/nozzia desicr Saf-
wy bmdft «f«ft trwr Mbt» and jet pulse deRvety systems, £*'
wOfh^i. B.-SU. no main vaives or dust removal systems, tt MM
found that the cost of Fibro/nbre components waift tw*ne*l.
ently lower than ttw cost of the Alloy/SiC: fasti^ujtu-nls- tni«
comparison is iifusirates m Figure H
_^^
Alternative Conlrot Technology Documont for Bakary
Oven Entlaalons.
R'jsearch Triangle Inst.. Research Triangle Part-:, NC: Ht« 02
106p EPA/453y'R-92/017 Sponsorefl by fcrtvao-Bi^nlal
Protection Agency, Research ln.ifk)i.: pyik, x-JC. Office of Air
Quatiiy PLsnninQ Ann S!.'in.-io"fc
PB93-1S7618/WEP Price cntit-., Pt: A06/MF A02
The document was produced in response tf> a niymst by the
baking industry for Federal gLwwj'st'a'! !y u^$isi in providing a
more uniform mbyinAh&t l«iw lor State decisJon-making witn
tsQfua in ftOftboi ot bakery oven emissions. The informa&on
si Hsu document Dertairts to bskenes thai produce ytflAi LSI-
v-ened bread, rolls, buns, and simitar produej* but nut crach-
«rs. sweet goods, or baked footfiiuitft mwt in.! not yeast fea-
vened. Information on me rmfctni] jwuw.tsses. equipment oper-
ating pJifitn'rtitraA, j'xjlutilial (jtnissions from baking, and poten-
IMI miosjkjn control options are presented. Catatyttc firm ».-.
generative oxidation are identified as the most .ippfi.ipria!*- e*.
isting control lechnofogies af^tcanife 10 vrx: emissions from
bakery ovens. Cost aattysm (ot votaiytic and regenerstive
oudaiwn A« HV^wfcd A wedictive fonnub for iise in eatima!-
"ig ovtTi ymissicns has been derived from source isste ifiji«.:
in function witfi the dsvelopmeni o( the ditnunx^nt us u»e and
applicability are descnbed.
Analyaia ot Post-combustion Catalytic Emissions
Treatment. Rnal Task Report. June-August 1332.
J H. R^gaibuto.
Illinois Univ. at Chicago. Dept, ot Cnemica! t-iKjitsr-^iaa 15
Dec S2. 5?p GRi-assUGAb SjXu^a.aw* by Gas Research
tnst., Cntcsgfi. I! ,
PB33-lS72S7yWEP P,HA rajah: R.: A04/MF AOt
Tha CLTreni poisRtiai fsr pait-i^irtirMAisjr: vsia^-li? «esuri€rit
cf naturai gaa engnws rms ijnvn determinecf by a literature
fjnut>y ;im! wjniu yfomenOry design ca-cuiatkms (of mfii^ra:
oxyalion. NO decompositbn. and NO recHjchi^tk uiHt !>vdro-
f^'''\ Hems cited as "Not Ava3ab!e rfHS" a^e fcrted as a service So the reader. ,
^ i\i-- ^ Prepared by ttw Naiio>Kii Technical Informatfon Se
^ ^.^..e--^^^^
rvice
fifaiion. Springnefd. VA 22161 (703) 487-46SG
The cost is only $160 per year
($225 outside the U.S., Canada, and Mexico).
To subscribe, call (703) 487-4630.
-------
United States
Environmental Protection
"Agency
Center for Environmental Research
Information
Cincinnati OH 45268
Official Business
Penalty for Private Use, $300
Please make all necessary changes on the above label,
detach or copy, and return to the address in the upper
left-hand corner.
If you do not wish to receive these reports CHECK HERE Q.
detach, or copy this cover, and return to the address in the
upper left-hand corner.
EPA/540/8-91/014
on RwycW Pojw
PB-S60
10*4
iiii HI,
------- |