vvEPA
                               United States
                               Environmental Protection
                               Agency
                                                      Office of Research and
                                                      Development
                                                      Washington, DC 20460
Office of Solid Waste and
Emergency Response
Washington, DC 20460
                               EPA/540/F-93/510E
                                                      September 1993
                                Bioremediation  Field
                                Initiative Site Profile:
                                Park  City  Pipeline
        SITE FACTS
         r;'/:^;^"^^^
 ,, Location: :Park City, Kansas  I
  Laboratories/Agencies: U.S. >
,  JEPARobertS.Kerr ] /
^Environmental Research '
** Laboratory (RSKERL);U,SJEFA
-"Region7       '< . : '
  Media/Contaminants: Refined   :
^'.petroleum (BTBX) fei ground
' «.\water" ,,*'""        '
  ^  X  ^        ^4      V|
js Treatment^ BTEXfermentatioiv '  '
< -' BTEX denitrification, BTBX, '„;"
.". denittificsafion supplemented
,#, with oxygen     -    >*'>,»
'/ Date of Initiative Selection:
>";
-------
45 to 50 ft below the surface. Hydrocarbon contami-
nation is confined roughly to an interval between
the base of the clay layer and the top of the present
water table (see Figure 2).
                                Total Petroleum
                                 Hydrocarbon
                                   (mg/kg)
                                   3000  6000
                                     i    i
Figure 2. Relationship among spilled hydrocarbons, layers of
geological materials, the water table, and monitoring wells.

Field Evaluation

In 1990, more than 400 shallow injection wells were
installed at the site. These wells are constructed on
a 20-ft grid and cover the entire area affected by the
spill. Researchers have divided an area affected by
the  homogeneous  fuel spill into three discrete
blocks of about 1 acre each and are applying one of
the following experimental treatments to each block:

• BTEX fermentation alone

• BTEX denitrification alone
• BTEX denitrification supplemented with oxygen

Water from a municipal supply well is pumped to
the surface, amended, and recirculated to the aqui-
fer through the injection wells. Each of the three
experimental plots receives approximately  125
gpm. At that rate, the water is estimated to require
an average of 6.4 days to recirculate. To maintain
the demonstration in  a cone of depression, water
also is being pumped from a second nearby well.

The water distributed to all three plots is amended
with ammonium chloride at 5 mg/L. Two plots also
receive nitrate at 10 mg/L as nitrogen. The third
plot receives oxygen at 2 mg/L. To act as a tracer,
and to enable researchers to estimate the volume of
water in  the recirculation loop, the recirculated
water is  amended with sodium bromide at 50
mg/L.
Status

Researchers have completed microcosm studies on
the two denitrification technologies to predict the
duration  of  remediation  required. Aquifer core
samples from two locations originally showed av-
erage BTEX concentrations of 42.6 mg/kg and 24.3
mg/kg, respectively.  Toluene, ethylbenzene,  m-
xylene,  p-xylene,   1,3,5-trimethylbenzene,   and
1,2,4-trimethylbenzene degraded  to  less  than 5
|ig/L within 20 days  in the clean aquifer micro-
cosms amended with nitrate. About  half of the
o-xylene  was  removed.  Benzene   and  1,2,3-
trimethylbenzene were recalcitrant. Based on these
findings, researchers predict that 210 days of treat-
ment will be required to supply enough nitrate
to remediate the aquifer. Remediation began in
December 1992.
  The Initiative's objectives are to more fully document the performance of full-scale applications of Wbremediatidn/; provide,1
  technical assistance to regional and state site managers; and provide.informati6n on treatability studies, design; and' operation ,bf •
  bioremediation projects. The Initiative currently is performing field evaluations of bioremediation at eight other hazardous waste
  sites: Libby Ground Water Superfund site, Libby, MT; Behdix Corporation/Allied Automotive Superfund site, St. Joseph,"MI; West
  KL Avenue Landfill Superfund site, Kalamazoo, MI; Eielson Air Force Base'Superfund site/Fairbanks, AK;yHill Air Force ,Base
  Superfund site, Salt Lake City, UT; Escambia Wood Preserving Siter^Brookhaven, Brookha,ven,,MS; Reilly Tar,,and Chemical
  contact Fran Kremer, Coordinator, Bioremediation Field Initiative, U.S. EPA/f Office of Research and Development, 26 West Martin
  Luther Kong Drive, Cincinnati, OH 45268; or Michael Forlini, U.S. EPA,*Technoiogy'lnnovation,Office,xOffice'bf Solid'Waste.and
  Emergency Response, 401M Street, SW., Washington, DC 20460. '',' -  ""V   ^'- , ~^'4 "''>-'*^      <*'''<  •> ' " *

-------