United States
                             Environmental Protection
                             Agency
                      Office of Research and
                      Development
                      Washington, DC 20460
Office of Solid Waste and
Emergency Response
Washington, DC 20460
      SITE FACTS
Location: Denver, Colorado

Laboratories/Agencies: U.S.
EPA National Risk Management
Research Laboratory (NRMRL),
U.S. EPA Region 8

Media and Contaminants:
BTEX in ground water

Treatment: In situ
bioremediation of ground water
with nutrient and hydrogen
peroxide addition

Date of Initiative Selection:
Spring 1991

Objective: To evaluate the
effectiveness of in situ
bioremediation of used oil and
the potential for future
environmental impact from
residual contaminants

Bioremediation Field Initiative
Contact: John Wilson, U.S. EPA
NRMRL, P.O. Box 1198, Ada,
OK 74820

Regional Contact: Suzanne
Stevenson, U.S. EPA Region 8,
999 18th Street, Denver, CO
80202-2466
                             EPA/540/F-95/506D
                      September 1995
Bioremediation  Field

Initiative  Site  Profile:


Public  Service  Company

of  Colorado

Background
In 1987, Public Service Company of Colorado (PS C), an electric utility,
determined that used oil had leaked from a 75-gallon catch basin at
the company's facility at 2701 West 7th Avenue in Denver, Colorado.
The catch basin served as a temporary storage container for used
automotive oil in the facility's garage.  A discrepancy between the
volume of oil deposited in the tank and the volume pumped out for
disposal led PSC to suspect the leak. Though it is unclear when the
leak first occurred, the basin had been in service for approximately 29
years before the leak was discovered.

Characterization
PSC found soil concentrations of oil and grease beneath the  tank
ranging up to 9,600 mg/kg. Soil samples also showed BTEX com-
pounds in the following concentrations: toluene, 3,200 |ig/kg; ethyl
benzene, 820 |ig/kg; and xylenes, 29,600 |ig/kg. Ground water sam-
pling  detected low  levels of BTEX compounds, though levels of
xylenes exceeded EPA's proposed drinking water standards.

Field Evaluation
An in situ bioremediation system was operated at the site from October
1989 to March 1992. Ground water was pumped from a recovery well
downgradient  of the spill at the rate of 11 gallons per minute.  The
recovered water was treated by carbon adsorption to remove dissolved
hydrocarbons and reinjected into  the aquifer upgradient of the spill
through two injection galleries.  Ground water amended with ammo-
nium,  phosphate, and hydrogen peroxide was injected through the first
gallery. Unamended ground water was injected through the second
gallery, upgradient of the first, to  sweep the amended ground water
through the spill to the recovery well. Injection rates were adjusted
periodically to optimize the delivery of nutrients and oxygen to the spill.
Figure 1 shows the plan view of the site.
A total of 10 to 15 pore volumes of ground water were exchanged over
the course of the treatment, which reduced BTEX levels in the ground-
water  monitoring wells to below cleanup level goals. In March 1992,
PSC submitted an application for closure to the State of Colorado and
the site entered a period of postremediation monitoring.
                                                                   Printed on paper that contains at least
                                                                   50 percent recycled fiber.

-------
 In July 1992, the Robert S. Kerr Environmental
 Research Laboratory (RSKERL) (now part of the
 National Risk Management Research  Labora-
 tory) and the University of Colorado at Boulder
 (UCB), with support from  the  Bioremediation
 Field Initiative, began a retrospective evaluation
 of bioremediation at the PSC  site. The evaluation
 consisted of aquifer sampling to assess the hy-
 drocarbon contamination remaining at the site
 after treatment, and modeling to predict whether
 a plume of contamination  would return after
 active  remediation was discontinued.

 Status

 RSKERL collected aquifer core  samples to determine
 the  quantity and distribution of hydrocarbons re-
 maining at the site.  Significant hydrocarbons were
 found  to remain in a  narrow, approximately  2-ft
  Hydrocarbon Release    MW-3
                                    • MW = Monitoring Wells
                                    A RW = Recovery Well
                                    • A-J = Boreholes
                                                     Table 1
Vertical Distribution of TPHs, Total BTEX Compounds, and Benzene
Found in Borehole D
Elevation
(feet above MSLaj
1609.711 to 1609.458
1609.458 to 1609.354
1609.354 to 1609.230
1609.230 to 1609.101
1609.101 to 1609.050
1609.050 to 1608.949
1608.949 to 1608.821
1608.821 to 1608.492
TPHs
(mg/kg)
<44
227
860
1,176
294
273
<34
<24
BTEX
(mg/kg)
<1
5.1
101
206
27
7.4
<1
<1
Benzene
(mg/kg)
<0.2
<0.2
<0.2
4.3
0.68
0.26
<0.2
<0.2
Color and
Texture
Brown sand
Brown sand
Black sand
Black sand
Black sand
Black sand
Black sand
Brown to
yellow sand
Figure 1. Plan view of the PSC site, showing the location of the work
pit, recovery and monitoring wells, and reinjection galleries and the
approximate area of the spill.
Mean sea level.

 thick interval just below the water table.  Table 1
 shows  the contaminant concentrations  found  at
 eight different sampling  depths  in  the borehole
 closest  to the source of the spill. These data suggest
 that active remediation physically and biologically
 weathered the spill,  creating a cortex of material
 with reduced levels of hydrocarbons  surrounding
 a core of material in which hydrocarbons were not
 degraded significantly.
 Following RSKERL's investigation of the residual
 contamination, researchers at UCB conducted hy-
 draulic conductivity tests and three-dimensional
 ground-water flow modeling to determine the ve-
 locity  and  trajectory  of  potential  contaminant
 plumes.   The  research team recommended  that
 compliance monitoring be continued until all of the
 subplumes have reached steady-state conditions,
 and that compliance wells be designed to minimize
 contaminant dilution.
  The Bioremediation Field Initiative was established in 1990 to expand the nation's field experience in bioremediation technologies.
  The Initiative's objectives are to more fully document the performance of full-scale applications of bioremediation; provide
  technical assistance to regional and state site managers; and provide information on treatability studies, design, and operation of
  bioremediation projects. The Initiative currently is performing field evaluations of bioremediation at eight other hazardous waste
  sites: Libby Ground Water Superfund site, Libby, MT; Park City Pipeline, Park City, KS; Bendix Corporation/Allied Automotive
  Superfund site, St. Joseph, MI; West KL Avenue Landfill Superfund site, Kalamazoo, MI; Eielson Air Force Base Superfund site,
  Fairbanks, AK; Hill Air Force Base Superfund site, Salt Lake City, LIT; Escambia Wood Preserving Site, Brookhaven, MS; and Reilly
  Tar and Chemical Corporation Superfund site, St. Louis Park, MN. To obtain profiles on these additional sites or to be added to
  the Initiative's mailing list, call 513-569-7562. For further information on the Bioremediation Field Initiative, contact Fran Kremer,
  Coordinator, Bioremediation Field Initiative, U.S. EPA, Office of Research and Development, 26 West Martin Luther King Drive,
  Cincinnati, OH 45268; or Michael Forlini, U.S. EPA, Technology Innovation Office, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response,
  401 M Street, SW., Washington, DC 20460.

-------