AEPA United States Environmental Protection Agency Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response (5204G) EPA 540-K-96-009 OSWER 9200.2-291 PB96-963253 December 1996 Superfund Today EPA Celebrates 400th Cleanup! The Lord-Shope Landfill in rural Girard Township, Pennsylvania just became the 400th Superfund site to reach the "construc- tion complete" milestone. A construction completion site is a former toxic waste site where physical construction of all cleanup actions are complete, all immediate threats have been addressed, and all long-term threats are under control. Carol Browner, EPA's Administrator, helped the Girard Township community celebrate Lord-Shope's construction completion status on October 15, 1996 along with representatives of the Lord Corporation—whose wastes, disposed of in the landfill, contaminated the ground water. As Administrator Browner stated: " This site is a symbol for the nation of what we can do when we join together, community by community, to clean toxic waste sites. It is also a symbol of the progress we've made in speeding up cleanups and making Superfund work faster, fairer, and more efficiently, in communities across the country." Lord-Shope Landfill was once a dump that contained large amounts of hazardous materials including rubber scrap, solvents, caustics, acids, and other chemicals. Soils and ground water were contaminated with volatile organic chemicals and lead, and the local water supply was threatened. The con- struction completion success at this site was a team effort between residents, the Com- monwealth of Pennsylvania, EPA, and the Lord Corporation. t/ Community members worried about the effects of toxic chemicals and debris on health, property, and quality of life in- formed the state and EPA about the situ- ation. 1r Pennsylvania's Department of Environmen- tal Resources protected residents from the more immediate threats by removing 81 drums of waste and covering the landfill with a clay cap to keep contamination from spreading. I/EPA designed the long-term remedy to protect the ground water and soil, and supervised the cleanup. I/'Lord Corporation is performing and pay- ing for the cleanup action under EPA's supervision. The price tag to date tops $5.5 million. Cleanup construction is now complete at Lord-Shope. A cutoff wall was installed to prevent lateral ground water migration through the fill materials thus helping to prevent future ground water contamination. Ground water cleanup is proceeding via pump and treat and continued monitoring of contaminants in ground water. Meanwhile, an innovative tech- nology—vapor stripping—is being used to decontaminate the soils. Parts of the site surface are ready for reuse, and options for future use are being considered. Celebrating 400 Construction Completions Lord-Shope landfill neighbor Ann Sawin; left, also a Rice Avenue Middle School (RAMS) teacher, and RAMS Save Our Surroundings environmental club officers Megan Kimmy and Garrett Boyce are shown with EPA Administrator Carol Browner at the Lord-Shope site. The students, said Browner, represent the future that the EPA, working in partnership with industry, aims to protect and salvage. Photo courtesy of Girard Cosmopolite Herald ------- Superfuna Today — Construction Completion Accelerating the Pace Moving More Sites to Construction Completion The Superfund program is moving faster than ever to clean up hazardous waste sites in communities all around the country. EPA completed construction at more sites in the last four years than were completed in the previous twelve years. In fact, more than 60% of the 410 current total construction completion sites were completed in the last four years. EPA has imple- mented a series of reforms within the Superfund pro- gram that are likely to accelerate the pace of cleanup (such as presumptive remedies). Committed to make Superfund work "faster, fairer, and more efficiently," EPA is right on track to move more sites through the cleanup pipeline to construction completion than ever before. "[The] 400th cleanup shows that we have delivered on our pledge to dramatically accelerate the pace of toxic waste cleanups... we are committed that Superfund must continue to work for the benefit of our communities—to protect our health and our environment for generations to come— and to meet our fundamental promise to the American people—the promise of fresh air to breathe, clean water to drink, safe food to eat, and land that is safe to live on." Carol Browner, Administrator, US EPA Speaking at the Lord-Shape Landfill in Girard, PA, October 15, 1996 410 Sites and Counting... The Superfund program initiated the construction completion program in 1991. In recent years, the construction completion "pace" has quickened. December 1996 ------- Superfund Today — Construction Completion Construction Completion What it Means A construction completion site is a former toxic waste site where physi- cal construction of all cleanup ac- tions are complete, all immediate threats have been addressed, and all long-term threats are under control. Bringing a toxic waste site to con- struction completion is a significant benchmark in the cleanup process. It means contaminants are no longer threatening the health and well-be- ing of the surrounding community or spreading uncontrolled through the soil, surface water, or ground water. At construction completion sites, EPA has designed and implemented cleanup remedies to eliminate con- tamination and restore the environment so that it may be reused. Even though long-term cleanup actions may still be operating, the site is often ready to be reused for economic, social, or environ- mental purposes. The diagram below shows a before and after example of a toxic dump site that has reached the construction completion stage. Once the contaminated drums and pol- luted soil are removed, a cutoff wall is installed and a pump and treat station is built to clean the ground water. Redevel- opment can be considered even though ground water treatment will continue for a number of years. The following examples illustrate ways a site may reach construction completion. t/ Many construction completion sites in- clude long-term treatment—For example, EPA might treat polluted soils and wastes that contaminated ground wa- ter. Waste would no longer enter the aquifer, but ground water would con- tinue to be pumped and treated until clean-perhaps for 20 years or more. Meanwhile, the site surface is ready for redevelopment. tr Construction Completion can also mean containment of hazardous waste—For example, EPA "caps" a landfill with an impermeable layer, and installs drains and gas collection systems to contain contamination. If no further long term treatment is necessary, the site is deemed construction complete. Removals can occur at any time Site Discovery Site Placed on National Priorities List (NPL) Remedial Investigation/ Feasibility Study Remedial Design Remedial Action Construction Completion Site Deletion from NPL The Path to Construction Completion Before Cleanup Hazardous chemicals have leaked into the land and ground water, threatening a nearby domestic water supply. At Construction Complete The land is clean and ready for reuse as ground water treatment continues. December 1996 ------- Superfuna Today — Construction Completion Cleanup Tools Behind the Scenes at a Superfund Site Each Superfund site is a fresh challenge. Landscapes and contours are unique, land uses vary, the contaminant mix is differ- ent, and options abound for site reuse. To deal with these situations, EPA approaches every site with a variety of cleanup options. These cleanup technologies are designed to fulfill EPA's mission of protecting hu- man health and the environment, maxi- mizing potential for site reuse, and mini- mizing costs to taxpayers in local commu- nities. Superfund's Established Technologies At construction completion sites, EPA employed more than two dozen different types of cleanup approaches that are tai- lored both to the types of contaminants and the natural resources that are polluted (such as soil and ground water). For contaminated soils, "excavation and removal" was the most common method used at construction completion sites. This method commonly removes polluted soil and debris by trucking it from a site and treating it at a licensed hazardous waste facility. The technology most often used at con- taminated ground water sites was "pump and treat." This method pumps water out of the ground through a series of wells, cleans it by treating the contaminants, and either rein- jects it back into the ground, discharges it into surface water, or sends it to a municipal water treatment plant. These cleanup approaches may sound simple; however, most Superfund sites con- tain more than one type of chemical, and often both water and soil resources are af- fected. When this is the case, EPA may use a combination of solutions including one or more of: 1) containing the contaminants (surface drainage control, soil capping, solidifi- cation); 2) separating harmful chemicals from the soil or water (soil vapor extraction, air stripping, carbon adsorption, soil flushing, thermal desorption); and/or 3) rendering the material less toxic (bioremediation, incineration). For example, in order to separate and cleanse oily wastes from soil at a dump site in Gray, Maine, a two-step aeration and heat- ing process was used. This process involved extracting contaminants from more than 12,000 cubic yards of soil and treating it on site. Streamlining the Cleanup Process with "Presumptive Remedies" Superfund's experience with developing and applying technologies gradually revealed certain contamination and cleanup patterns. As a result, EPA streamlined the cleanup process in cases where contaminants are simi- lar and cleanup technologies are proven, as at municipal landfills and wood treatment facilities. EPA calls these cost-efficient and timesaving approaches "presumptive rem- edies." By applying lessons learned at previ- ous cleanups, the Agency can reduce costs and save time while ensuring cleanup of equal quality. Development of Cutting Edge Technologies When EPA began full-scale cleanup of Superfund sites in the early 1980s, there were very few tested remedies and almost no infor- mation on the performance of hazardous waste cleanup. The Agency understood from the beginning the importance of developing new technologies that would reduce cleanup costs and make them more effective. EPA is now at the point where that investment is paying off. Today over 350 innovative tech- nology projects are completed, planned, or Spotlight on Technology Facts and Figures For the 410 construction completion sites* • The "big three" cleanup approaches used are: • excavating and removing hazardous soil and solid waste (45% or 188 sites); • covering the land with a protective cap (39% or 161 sites); and • pumping and treating contaminated groundwater (34% or 142 sites). I'' Extracting toxic gas from the ground (33 sites) and using natural organisms to breakdown contaminants (12 sites) are the most common innovative technologies used. *Note: More than one technology may be associated with a construction completion site. See the tables onpages6-7for more details on the types of cleanup technologies used at construction completion sites. underway at Superfund sites. Examples of innovative technologies that EPA re- cently added include: flushing chemicals from soils while the soils remain in place; heating soil to vaporize contaminants and capture them; and introducing mi- croorganisms, such as bacteria and fungi, to break down hazardous chemicals into less harmful substances. December 1996 ------- Superfund Today — Construction Completion Ready for Reuse Reclaiming Our Land and Water Beneficial Reuse is a Team Effort The actual reuse of a site is driven by many factors—local business climate, real estate and land prices, and natural features. However, the most important aspect is the early involvement of all interested parties, namely local citizens, municipal leaders, businesses, and state officials. Throughout the cleanup pro- cess, from site identification (discov- ery) to construction completion, EPA encourages open dialogue with the com- munity to determine reuse opportuni- ties. Reuse can create many benefits that productively impact local communities, including new jobs, higher property values, and better quality of life through the preservation of open space and rec- reational areas. In short, EPA remains committed to cleaning up toxic hot spots and making cleaned areas available, where possible, for productive reuse by local communities. From Fly Ash to Fly Balls! Children get ready to start their first > haseball game at the revitalizalized Chisman Creek site. Construction Completion Sites Returned to Productive Use Contrary to the image of Superfund sites as toxic and barren eyesores, many construction completion sites can soon can be used in some productive way. The sites vary in use from commercial to industrial activity, from retail to food service, or even high-tech manufactur- ing. The Krysowaty Farm site in New Jer- sey, once an illegal dumping area, is now being used as a plant nursery. The Tronic Plating Company site in New York, a former electroplating facility, was con- verted for warehouse storage and a fac- tory for contact lenses. Superfund sites are also being re- stored to places where people can live and play. One such site is Chisman Creek, near Newport News, Virginia, which reached construction completion in December 1990. This former fly ash disposal site is now a community park with sports fields and walking trails. Likewise, the Petersen Sand and Gravel site in Illi- nois, once a contaminated gravel pit, is being used by watersports enthusi- asts and picnickers. Many sites are set aside as natural areas. Imagine some of the most dan- gerous hazardous waste sites in the country transformed into places where aquatic birds migrate and feed. That is exactly what happened at the Bayou Sorrel site in Louisiana, where the cleanup of more than 36,000 cubic yards of petrochemical waste restored a productive wetland. Also, efforts at the Woodbury Chemical Co. site in Florida eliminated waterborne toxins in a local canal that harmed manatees, an endangered species. December 1996 ------- Superfund Today — Construction Completion Construction Completion Statistics Number and Types of NPL Sites 360 NPL sites are not yet in the construction phase (28.5% 410 NPL sites are in construction completion (32.5%) 493 NPL sites have construction underway ( 39.0%) Types of Construction Completion Sites Each of the 410 construction completion sites are characterized and placed into site- type categories. Some sites fall into multiple categories due to site-specific complexities. This table reflects the type of sites and the number of each type. TYPES OF SITES Industrial Waste Landfill Manufacturing Plant Ground Water Inorganic Waste Chemical Plants Wells Lagoons Waterways/Creeks/Rivers Housing Area/Farm Mine/Tailings Military Related Radioactive Site Other Construction Completion Progress Over 32 percent of the 1,263 total proposed or final NPL sites as of September 30, 1996 are in construction completion 15 30 45 60 75 90 NUMBER OF SITES 105 120 December 1996 ------- Superfund Today — Construction Completion Construction Completion Statistics Site Leads and Technologies Used Who Managed the Construction Completion? Federal Facility Lead (9 sites or 2.2%) Other Lead (8 sites or 2%) Various parties direct activities at Superfund sites. This pie chart portrays the party in charge of the site when construction completion occurred. Responsible Party Lead (243 sites or 59.3%) EPA Lead (114 sites or 27.8%) State Lead (36 sites or 8.8%) SITE CLEAfelUP MfclHdlDS* Containment Excavation and Removal 188 Surface Capping/Soil Cover 161 Surface Drainage Control 51 Backfilling 61 Solidification/Stabilization 30 & Immobilization Treatment Ground Water Pump & Treat 142 - Air Stripping 47 Incineration - On Site 16 - Off Site 20 Innovative Technologies - Soil Vapor Extraction 33 - Bioremediation 12 - Thermal Desorption, 4 - Dechlorination 3 - In-Situ Flushing 3 - Soil Washing 2 Other Actions Ground Water Monitoring/Wells 293 Institutional Controls 153 Alternate Water Supplies 56 Cleanup Technologies Used at Superfund's 410 Construction Completion Sites The cleanup technologies listed here are those used at the current total of 410 construction completion sites. Many sites need more than one type of technology. ( More than one technology may be associated with a construction completion site. December 1996 ------- Superfuna Today — Construction Completion Construction Completion Sites by State Alabama (3 sites) Mowbray Engineering Co. Perdido Ground Water Contamination Triana/Tennessee River Alaska (isite) Alaska Battery Enterprises American Samoa (1 site) Taputimu Farm Arizona (1 site) Mountain View Mobile Home Estates Arkansas (8 sites) Arkwood, Inc. Cecil Lindsey Gurley Pit Industrial Waste Control Jacksonville Municipal Landfill Mid-South Wood Products Midland Products Rogers Road Municipal Landfill California (25 sites) Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. (Bldg. 915) Applied Materials Beckman Instruments (Porterville Plant) Celtor Chemical Works Coalinga Asbestos Mine CTS Printex, Inc. Del Norte Pesticide Storage Fairchild Semiconductor Corp. (S San Jose) Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. (Salinas Plant) Intel Corp. (Santa Clara III) Intel Magnetics Intersil, Inc./Siemens Components Jibboom Junkyard Liquid Gold Oil Corp. Louisiana-Pacific Corp. MGM Brakes Monolithic Memories Pacific Coast Pipe Lines Sola Optical USA, Inc. Spectra-Physics, Inc. Synertek, Inc. (Building 1) Teledyne Semiconductor TRW Microwave, Inc. (Building 825) Watkins-Jphnson Co. (Stewart Division) Colorado (5 sites) Broderick Wood Products Marshall Landfill Sand Creek Industrial Smuggler Mountain Woodbury Chemical Co. Connecticut (2 sites) Kellogg-Deering Well Field Revere Textile Prints Corp. Delaware (11 sites) Army Creek Landfill Coker's Sanitation Service Landfills Harvey & Knott Drum, Inc. NCR Corp. (Millsboro Plant) New Castle Spill New Castle Steel Sealand Limited Sussex County Landfill No. 5 Tybouts Corner Landfill Tyler Refrigeration Pit Wildcat Landfill Florida (24 sites) Alpha Chemical Corp. Anaconda Aluminum Co./ Milgo Electronics B&B Chemical Co., Inc. Beulah Landfill BMI-Textron Brown Wood Preserving Chemform, Inc. City Industries, Inc. Davie Landfill Dubose Oil Products Co. Gold Coast Oil Corp. Hipps Road Landfill Hollingsworth Solderless Terminal Miami Drum Services Northwest 58th Street Landfill Parramore Surplus Pepper Steel & Alloys, Inc. Pioneer Sand Co. Sixty-Second Street Dump Standard Auto Bumper Corp. Tri-City Oil Conservationist, Inc. Varsol Spill Wilson Concepts of Florida, Inc. Woodbury Chemical Co. (Princeton Plant) Georgia (5 sites) Cedartown Municipal Landfill Diamond Shamrock Corp. Landfill Luminous Processes, Inc. Monsanto Corp. (Augusta Plant) Powersville Site Guam (Isite) Ordot Landfill Idaho (2 sites) Arrcom (Drexler Enterprises) Union Pacific Railroad Co. Illinois (9 sites) A & F Material Reclaiming, Inc. Belvidere Municipal Landfill Central Illinois Public Service Co. Cross Brothers Pail Recycling (Pembroke) Johns-Manville Corp. LaSalle Electric Utilities Petersen Sand & Gravel Velsicol Chemical Corp. (Illinois) Wauconda Sand & Gravel Indiana (15 sites) Carter Lee Lumber Co. Columbus Old Municipal Landfill #1 Fort Wayne Reduction Dump International Minerals (E. Plant) Lake Sandy Jo (M&M Landfill) Main Street Well Field Ninth Avenue Dump Northside Sanitary Landfill, Inc. Poer Farm Seymour Recycling Corp. Southside Sanitary Landfill Tri-State Plating Wayne Waste Oil Wedzeb Enterprises, Inc. Whiteford Sales & Service/Nationalease Iowa (9 sites) Aidex Corp. E.I. Du Pont de Nemours (County Rd X23) Fairfleld Coal Gasification Plant John Deere (Ottumwa Works Landfills) LaBounty Site Lawrence Todtz Farm Northwestern States Portland Cement Co. December 1996 ------- Superfund Today — Construction Completion Construction Completion Sites by State Iowa, (continued) Vogel Paint & Wax Co. White Farm Equipment Co. Dump Kansas (4 sites) Arkansas City Dump Big River Sand Co. Hydro-Flex Inc. Johns' Sludge Pond Kentucky (9 sites) A.L. Taylor (Valley of Drums) Caldwell Lace Leather Co., Inc. Distler Brickyard Distler Farm General Tire & Rubber (Mayfield Landfill) Howe Valley Landfill Lee's Lane Landfill Newport Dump Tri-Ciry Disposal Co. Louisiana (Isite) Bayou Sorrel Site Maine (2 sites) McKin Co. Saco Tannery Waste Pits Maryland (3 sites) Chemical Metals Industries, Inc. Mid-Atlantic Wood Preservers, Inc Middletown Road Dump Massachusetts (3 sites) Cannon Engineering Corp. (CEC) Plymouth Harbor/Cannon Engineering Corp. Rose Disposal Pit Michigan (31 sites) Adam's Plating American Anodco, Inc. Anderson Development Co. Auto Ion Chemicals, Inc. Berlin & Farro Burrows Sanitation Carter Industrials, Inc. Cemetery Dump Charlevoix Municipal Well Chem Central Cliff/Dow Dump Michigan (continued) Folkertsma Refuse Grand Traverse Overall Supply Co. Gratiot County Golf Course Gratiot County Landfill Hedblum Industries Hi-Mill Manufacturing Co. Kent City Mobile Home Park Kentwood Landfill Kysor Industrial Corp. Mason County Landfill Metal Working Shop Northernaire Plating Novaco Industries Rasmussen's Dump Rose Township Dump Southwest Ottawa County Landfill Spiegelberg Landfill U.S. Aviex Velsicol Chemical Corp.(Michigan) Whitehall Municipal Wells Minnesota (26sites) Adrian Municipal Well Field Agate Lake Scrapyard Boise Cascade/Onan Corp./Medtronics, Inc. Burlington Northern (Brainerd/Baxter) Dakhue Sanitary Landfill FMC Corp. (Fridley Plant) General Mills/Henkel Corp. Joslyn Manufacturing & Supply Co. Kurt Manufacturing Co. LaGrand Sanitary Landfill Lehillier/Mankato Site Morris Arsenic Dump NL Industries/Taracorp/Golden Auto Nutting Truck & Caster Co. Oak Grove Sanitary Landfill Oakdale Dump Olmsted County Sanitary Landfill Pine Bend Sanitary Landfill South Andover Site Twin Cities Air Force Base (SAR Landfill) Union Scrap Iron & Metal Co. University Minnesota (Rosemount Res Cen) Washington County Landfill Waste Disposal Engineering Whittaker Corp. Windom Dump Mississippi (2 sites) Flowood Site Walcotte Chemical Co. Warehouses Missouri (7 sites) Conservation Chemical Co. Fulbright Landfill Kem-Pest Laboratories Lee Chemical North-U Drive Well Contamination Solid State Circuits, Inc. Wheeling Disposal Service Co. Landfill Montana (2 sites) Libby Ground Water Contamination Mouat Industries Nebraska (2 sites) Lindsay Manufacturing Co. Waverly Ground Water Contamination New Hampshire (7 sites) Kearsarge Metallurgical Corp. Keefe Environmental Services Mottolo Pig Farm South Municipal Water Supply Well Sylvester Tinkham Garage Town Garage/Radio Beacon New Jersey (31 sites) Beachwood/Berkley Wells Bog Creek Farm Chemical Control Combe Fill North Landfill Cooper Road Denzer & Schafer X-Ray Co. Friedman Property Goose Farm Helen Kramer Landfill Hopkins Farm Jackson Township Landfill King of Prussia Krysowary Farm Lang Property Lodi Municipal Well Lone Pine Landfill M&T Delisa Landfill Mannheim Avenue Dump Monroe Township Landfill December 1996 ------- Super/una Today — Construction Completion Construction Completion Sites by State New Jersey (continued) Pijak Farm Pomona Oaks Residential Wells Renora, Inc. Ringwood Mines/Landfill South Brunswick Landfill Spence Farm Tabernacle Drum Dump Upper Deerfield Township Sanit. Landfill Vineland State School Williams Property Wilson Farm Witco Chemical Corp. (Oakland Plant) New Mexico (6 sites) Cal West Metals (USSBA) Cimarron Mining Corp. Homestake Mining Co. Pagano Salvage Prewitt Abandoned Refinery South Valley New York (17 sites) Action Anodizing, Plating, & Polishing Applied Environmental Services EEC Trucking BioClinical Laboratories, Inc. C & J Disposal Leasing Co. Dump Clothier Disposal Conklin Dumps Katonah Municipal Well Kenmark Textile Corp. Marathon Battery Corp. North Sea Municipal Landfill Old Bethpage Landfill Radium Chemical Co., Inc. SMS Instruments, Inc. Suffern Village Well Field Tronic Plating Co., Inc. Wide Beach Development North Carolina (3 sites) Celanese Corp. (Shelby Fiber Operations) Chemtronics, Inc. PCB Spills North Dakota (2 sites) Arsenic Trioxide Site Minot Landfill Northern Marianas (1 site) PCB Warehouse Ohio (14 sites) Alsco Anaconda Big D Campground Bowers Landfill Chem-Dyne Chemical & Minerals Reclamation Coshocton Landfill E.H. Schilling Landfill Laskin/Poplar Oil Co. New Lyme Landfill Old Mill Republic Steel Corp. Quarry Summit National TRW, Inc. (Minerva Plant) Zanesville Well Field Oklahoma (3 sites) Compass Industries (Avery Drive) Fourth Street Abandoned Refinery Tenth Street Dump/Junkyard Oregon (4 sites) Allied Plating, Inc. Joseph Forest Products Martin-Marietta Aluminum Co. United Chrome Products, Inc. Pennsylvania (30 sites) Aladdin Plating Ambler Asbestos Piles AMP, Inc. (Glen Rock Facility) Bendix Flight Systems Division Berks Sand Pit Bruin Lagoon Craig Farm Drum Enterprise Avenue Pennsylvania (continued) Hebelka Auto Salvage Yard Hellertown Manufacturing Co. Henderson Road Hranica Landfill Kimberton Site Lackawanna Refuse Lansdowne Radiation Site Lehigh Electric & Engineering Co. Lord-Shope Landfill McAdoo Associates Middletown Air Field Old City of York Landfill Presque Isle Raymark Reeser's Landfill River Road Landfill/Waste Mngmnt, Inc. Route 940 Drum Dump Taylor Borough Dump Voortman Farm Wade (ABM) Wesdine Site York County Solid Waste/Refuse Landfill Rhode Island (1 site) Western Sand & Gravel South Carolina (5 sites) Golden Strip Septic Tank Service Independent Nail Co. Medley Farm Drum Dump Rochester Property SCRDI Dixiana South Dakota (2 sites) Whitewood Creek Williams Pipe Line Co. Disposal Pit Tennessee (6sites) Amnicola Dump Carrier Air Conditioning Co. Chemet Co. Gallaway Pits Lewisburg Dump Mallory Capacitor Co. 10 December 1996 ------- Superfund Today — Construction Completion Construction Completion Sites by Site Texas (14 sites) Bio-Ecology Systems, Inc. Crystal City Airport Dixie Oil Processors, Inc. French, Ltd. Geneva Industries/Fuhrmann Energy Harris (Farley Street) Highlands Acid Pit Odessa Chromium #1 Odessa Chromium #2 (Andrews Highway) Pesses Chemical Co. Sikes Disposal Pits Sol Lynn/Industrial Transformers Stewco, Inc. Triangle Chemical Co. Trust Territories (1 site) PCB Wastes Utah (3 sites) Ogden Defense Depot (DLA) Rose Park Sludge Pit Utah Power & Light/American Barrel Co. Vermont (3 sites) BFI Sanitary Landfill (Rockingham) Darling Hill Dump Old Springfield Landfill Virginia (5 sites) C &£ R Battery Co., Inc. Gasman Creek First Piedmont Rock Quarry (Route 719) Matthews Electroplating Suffolk City Landfill Washington (21 sites) ALCOA (Vancouver Smelter) American Crossarm & Conduit Co. American Lake Gardens/McChord AFB Bonneville Power Admin Ross (USDOE) FMC Corp. (Yakima Pit) Fort Lewis (Landfill No. 5) Hamilton Island Landfill (USA/COE) Hanford 1100-Area (USDOE) Washington (continued) Lakewood Site McChord Air Force Base (Wash Rack/Treat) Naval Air Station, Whidbey Is (Seaplane) Northside Landfill Northwest Transformer Northwest Transformer (S Harkness St) Pacific Car & Foundry Co. Pesticide Lab (Yakima) Seattle Municipal Landfill (Kent Hghlnds) Silver Mountain Mine Toftdahl Drums Western Processing Co., Inc. Yakima Plating Co. West Virginia (1 site) Leetown Pesticide Wisconsin (15 sites) Algoma Municipal Landfill Eau Claire Municipal Well Field Fadrowski Drum Disposal Hagen Farm Lemberger Landfill, Inc. Mid-State Disposal, Inc. Landfill Northern Engraving Co. Oconomowoc Electroplating Co. Inc. Onalaska Municipal Landfill Ripon City Landfill Sauk County Landfill Schmalz Dump Tomah Fairgrounds Wausau Ground Water Contamination Wheeler Pit Wyoming (1 site) Mystery Bridge Rd/U.S. Highway 20 For More Information... EPA Contact for this Issue of Superfund Today U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Emergency and Remedial Response Community Involvement and Outreach Center (703)603-8835 EPA Superfund Hotline (800) 424-9346 or TDD: (800) 553-7672 EPA Headquarters Library 401 M Street, SW Washington, D.C. 20460 (202) 260-5921 Internet Resources • EPA Home Page www.epa.gov • EPA Superfund Hotline Home Page www.epa.gov/epaoswer/hotline.htm • EPA Headquarters Library Home Page www.epa.gov/access/chapter6/chapter6.htm * Superfund Home Page www.epa.gov/superfund • EPA Technology Innovation Office CLU-INDatabase (cleanup information) www.clu-in.com Construction Completion Reading Call the Superfund Docket at (703) 603-8917 to obtain these publications: • Common Cleanup Methods at Superfund Sites. 1994. 28 pp. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Office of Emergency and Remedial Response. EPA 540-R94- 043. * Superfund Post Remediation Accomplish- ments: Uses of the Land and Environmental Achievements (Volume I). 1996. 92 pp. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response. EPA 540-R94-007. December 1996 11 ------- Superfund Today — Construction Completion San Francisco EPA Regional Offices Boston ) New York Philadelphia Region 2 Puerto Rico Virgin Islands &EPA United States Environmental Protection Agency (MC 5202G) Superfund Document Center Washington, DC 20460 • Official Business Penalty for Private Use $300 12 December 1996 ------- |