United States
                            Environmental Protection
                            Agency
       EPA/540/M5-90/003
       February 1990
                            SUPERFUND  INNOVATIVE
                            TECHNOLOGY EVALUATION
                           Demonstration Bulletin


                            In-Situ  Steam/Hot-Air Soil Stripping

                                       Toxic Treatment (USA) Inc.
TECHNOLOGY  DESCRIPTION: This technology
uses steam and hot air to strip volatile  organics from
contaminated soil. The treatment equipment is  mobile
and  treats the soil in-situ without need for  soil
excavation or  transportation.  The  organic
contaminants volatilized from the  soil are condensed
and collected by the process treatment train, resulting
in a small volume of concentrated  organic liquid waste
for transportation, disposal, or recycle.

A process tower supports and controls a pair of hollow
augers (Figure  1) which are moved vertically through
the soil. The augers are  rotated synchronously  in
opposite directions during  the  treatment process  to
break up the soil and ensure  through-flow of  gases.
Steam, at 400°F, and compressed air, at 275°F, are
piped through the augers to nozzles located  on the
cutter blades. Heat from the injected steam and hot
air vaporizes the  volatile organics, and the  gas flow
carries the contaminants to the soil surface. A steel
shroud (a 10' by 6' by 7' box) covers the 7'4" by  4'
area of soil undergoing treatment.  The suction  port  of
a blower keeps the area underneath the shroud at a
                                 COMPRESSOR
vacuum to assist the flow of gases from the soil, and
to ensure against leakage to the outside environment.

The  off-gases  are  pulled  by the blower from the
shroud  to  the  treatment  train, where water and
organics are removed by condensation in coolers and
carbon  adsorption  beds.   The  air is  filtered and
recycled  to the soil by  a compressor. Water  is
removed from  the  liquid  stream  with a 4-stage
separator followed by batch distillation, and is then
recycled to a cooling tower. The condensed organics
are collected and held for removal and transportation.

WASTE  APPLICABILITY:  This technology  is
designed to be used on soil contaminated with volatile
organics to a maximum depth of 30 feet. Semivolatiles
may potentially be removed by this technology.

DEMONSTRATION RESULTS: Demonstration of this
technology was conducted  at the Annex Terminal site
in San Pedro, California, in  September 1989 as part  of
an extensive testing program.  Site characterization
investigations indicated that the soil was contaminated
                                                                             Organios

                                                                                Treatment/
                                                                              Disposal
Figure 1. Process Flow Diagram.

-------
with  significant  amounts  of  chlorobenzene,
trtchloroethene, tetrachloroethene,  phthalates, and
other volatile and  semivolatile organics. Twelve  soil
blocks (7'4" by 4')  were treated to 5-foot depth during
the SITE Demonstration. Pre-  and post-treatment
composite  soil samples  were collected from  5-foot
vertical corings.  Fluorescein dye was added to four
blocks to evaluate  migration of contaminants from the
treated blocks. In  addition,  air  emission  monitoring
was conducted at the soil surface for potential off-gas
emissions.  Extensive process operating data were
collected, such  as steam  and  air flow rates,  and
organic concentration in  the gases collected in the
shroud.  Laboratory activities conducted  for  the
Demonstration included analysis  of volatile  and
semivolatile  organic  compounds,  soil  physical
characteristics, and dye concentrations.

The Demonstration showed that:

    "   Removal  efficiencies of  volatile  organic
        compounds were greater than 90%.
                         *   Semivolatile  organic compounds were also
                             removed, but at a lower efficiency.

                         *   Downward migration  of  compounds is  not
                             significant.

                         *   Fugitive emissions around the  area  being
                             treated and previously treated areas are low.

                      A  Technical  Evaluation  Report describing  the
                      complete Demonstration will be available in the Fall of
                      1990.

                      For Further Information:
                      EPA PROJECT MANAGER
                      Paul R. de Percin
                      USEPA
                      Risk Reduction Engineering Laboratory
                      26 West Martin Luther King Drive
                     ~ Cincinnati, OH 45268
                      (513) 569-7797       (FTS 684-7797)
  United States
  Environmental Protection
  Agency
Center for Environmental Research
Information
Cincinnati OH 45268
     BULK RATE
POSTAGE & FEES PAID
        EPA
   PERMIT No. Q-35
  Official Business
  Penalty for Private Use $300

  EPA/540/M5-90/003

-------