United States
                                   Environmental Protection
                                   Agency
                      EPA/540/M5-91/005
                      Aug.1991
                                  SUPERFUND  INNOVATIVE
                                  TECHNOLOGY EVALUATION
                                     Demonstration  Bulletin

                                             Flame Reactor

                                   Horsehead Resource Development Company, Inc.
Technology Description: The  Horsehead Resource Develop-
ment Company, Inc. (HRD)  Flame Reactor is a patented and
proven high temperature thermal process designed to safely treat
industrial residues and wastes containing metals.  During pro-
cessing, the waste material is introduced  into the hottest portion
of the Flame Reactor, where the wastes are subjected to a very
hot reducing gas (greater than 2000°C) produced from the com-
bustion of solid or gaseous hydrocarbon fuels in oxygen-enriched
air. At these high temperatures volatile metals in the waste are
volatilized and  organic compounds are  destroyed.   The waste
materials react rapidly, producing a non-leachable slag and gases,
including steam and volatile metal vapors.  The metal vapors
further react and cool  in the combustion chamber and cooling
system to produce a metal-enriched oxide that is collected in a
baghouse.  The resulting metal oxides can be recycled to recover
the metals.   The amount of  waste reduction to slag and oxide
depends on the chemical  and physical properties of the waste
material.

Nonvolatile  metals are vitrified in the slag that leaves the reactor
from the slag separator. After testing to ascertain that the slag is
nonhazardous,  it can generally be recycled as clean fill material.
If the slag cannot be recycled because it is determined to be toxic
after Toxicity Characteristic Leaching Procedure (TCLP) testing, it
can be disposed of in  a permitted landfill.  Figure 1 presents a
schematic diagram of the HRD Flame Reactor.
Waste Applicability:  The Flame Reactor technology can po-
tentially be applied to many types of granular solids, soil, flue
dust, slag,  and sludge containing  very high concentrations of
heavy  metals.   Wastes to be  treated  by the  Flame Reactor
should be dry  (less than 15% total moisture) and fine-grained
(less than 200 mesh) to react  rapidly. Larger particles (up to 20
mesh)  can be  processed, but may decrease the  efficiency of
metals recovery or the capacity  of the reactor.   Wastes not
meeting the moisture content and particle size criteria require
pretreatment.  Generally,  wastes  with  high concentrations of
heavy  metals that have a significant market value (zinc, lead,
arsenic, and possibly silver and gold) should enhance the overall
process economics.  Product metal oxide containing valuable
metals can be further processed for metal recovery in industrial
smelters.

Demonstration Results: The HRD Flame Reactor was demon-
strated at the HRD facility in Monaca,  Pennsylvania, in  March
1991.  Approximately 72 tons of waste material from the National
Smelting and Refining site in Atlanta, Georgia, was treated during
all phases  of testing for the  HRD SITE  demonstration.  This
waste material is a granular secondary lead smelter blast furnace
soda slag containing approximately 15.0% carbon, 10.3% iron,
12.2%  sodium,  5.3% sulfur, 5.4% lead, 5% silicon, 2.5% chlorine,
0.4% zinc,  0.5% arsenic, 0.04% cadmium,  many other metals
and inorganic chemicals, and approximately 15%  water.   The
                                                  NATURAL CAS
                                                             couausnoH AIR
                                                              COUFRES90H

COUBU3T1OM
CIIAUBER



SLAG
SEPARATOR
	 	 1 	 s.
                                                           POOT-COUBUOT1OH AIR
 Figure 1. HRD Flame Reactor Process Flow Schematic
                                                                                           Printed on Recycled Paper

-------
waste material was dried and passed through a hammermill prior
to treatment in the Flame Reactor.  The demonstration test runs
included a series of shakedown runs to establish optimal operat-
ing conditions, a blank run during which no waste was treated,
three test runs, and a series of additional runs to evaluate system
durability and to process remaining waste material.

Extensive process operating data and analytical samples were
collected.   The operating data included  raw waste feed  and
processed waste  accumulation  rates,  natural gas and  oxygen
consumption rates, electrical consumption, temperatures through-
out the system, and flow rates throughout the system.  Laboratory
analyses included analyses of the  raw feed  for metals,  energy
content, ash content, moisture, sulfur, chloride, fluoride, carbon,
and total organic  carbon  content.   Effluent samples (processed
waste slag and baghouse dust) were analyzed for  metals. The
raw feed and processed waste slag  were also analyzed by TCLP
testing for metals.  Concentrations of CO, CO2, O2, NOx, SO2, total
hydrocarbons, and metals in  the stack gases were  also mea-
sured.  Analytical data are summarized in Tables 1 and 2.

Key findings from  the HRD SITE demonstration are summarized
betow:

   « Although samples of the  raw feed failed the TCLP test due
     to  high cadmium and lead levels, all samples of processed
     waste slag passed the TCLP test for all metals.  The pro-
     cessed waste slag can be disposed of in a sanitary landfill or
     used as fill material.
   • Lead and zinc from the raw feed (5.4% and 0.4% weight)
     were removed from the processed waste slag (0.6 and 0.1%
     weight) and concentrated in the baghouse dust (18.0% and
     13.2% weight). The baghouse dust may be recycled for its
     lead content.  The process showed better than 90% recov-
     ery for both lead and zinc.
   • The weight of the waste was reduced  by approximately
     30%, largely due to  removal  of water and carbon during
     pretreatment and treatment.
   • With the exception of SO2, stack gas emissions were within
     HRD permit  limits.  SO,, emissions were high due to the
     amount of sulfur in  the waste.  The SO2 emissions could
     readily be controlled with  the use of a scrubber.

An  Applications Analysis  Report  and a Technology  Evaluation
Report describing the complete HRD SITE demonstration will be
available in the Spring of 1992.
                  Table 1.  Metal Concentration Ranges in Influent and Effluent Wastes
                           (Preliminary)

Arsenic
Cadmium
Copper
Iron
Lead
Zinc
Raw Feed
(mg/kg)
428-582
380-512
1,460-2,590
95,600-111,000
48,200-61,700
3,210-4,660
Processed Slag
(mg/kg)
92.1-675
2.3-13.5
2,730-3,890
167,000-228,000
1,560-11,400
709-1,680
Baghouse Dust
(mg/kg)
1,010-1,130
1,080-1,370
1,380-1,670
29,100-31,800
159,000-180,000
10,000-16,200
                  Table 2.  TCLP Results (Preliminary)

Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Lead
Mercury
Selenium
Silver
Raw Feed
(mg/L)
<0.210-0.264
0.0177-0.0675
7,61-15.8
0.140-0.283
4.35-6.80
<0.010
<0.030-0.160
<0.050
Processed Slag
(mg/L)
<0.2 10-0.930
0.109-0.281
<0.050
<0.060
<0.330
<0.010
<0.030-0.0730
<0.050
                  For Further Information

                  EPA Project Managers
                     Donald A. Oberacker
                     U.S. EPA
                     Office of Research and Development
                     Risk Reduction Engineering Laboratory
                     26 West Martin Luther King Drive
                     Cincinnati, OH  45268
                     (513) 569-7510 (FTS: 684-7510)

                     Marta K. Richards
                     U.S. EPA
                     Office of Research and Development
                     Risk Reduction Engineering Laboratory
                     26 West Martin Luther King Drive
                     Cincinnati, OH  45268
                     (513) 569-7783 (FTS: 684-7783)
 United States
 Environmental Protection
 Agency
Center for Environmental
Research Information
Cincinnati, OH 45268
      BULK RATE
POSTAGE & FEES PAID
         EPA
   PERMIT No. G-35
 Official Business
 Penalty for Private Use $300
 EPA/540/M5-91/005

-------