&EPA
United States
Environmental Protection
The Superfund Innovative
Technology Evaluation
Program
Annual Report to Congress
FY2000
SUPERFUND INNOVATIVE
TECHNOLOGY EVALUATION
-------
-------
EPA/540/R-02/505
October 2002
The Superfund Innovative Technology
Evaluation Program
Annual Report to Congress
FY 2000
Office of Research and Development
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Washington, DC 20460
Recycled/Recyclable
Printed with vegetable-based ink on
paper that contains a minimum of
50% post-consumer fiber content
processed chlorine free.
-------
Notice
The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, through its Office of Research and
Development, partially funded and collaborated in the research described here under our contract
No. 68-C-OO-l 86 to Environmental Quality Management, Inc. It has been subjected to the Agency's
peer and administrative review and has been approved for publication as an EPA document.
Mention of trade names or commercial products does not constitute endorsement or recommendation
for use.
11
-------
Foreword
The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is charged by Congress with protecting the Nation's
land, air, and water resources. Under a mandate of national environmental laws, the Agency staves to formulate
and implement actions leading to a compatible balance between human activities and the ability of natural
systems to support and nurture life. To meet this mandate, EPA's research program is providing data and
technical support for solving environmental problems today and building a science knowledge base necessary to
manage our ecological resources wisely, understand how pollutants affect our health, and prevent or reduce
environmental risks in the future.
The National Risk Management Research Laboratory (NRMRL) is the Agency' s center for investigation
of technological and management approaches for preventing and reducing risks from pollution that threaten
human health and the environment. The focus of the Laboratory's research program is on methods and their cost-
effectiveness for prevention and control of pollution to air, land, water, and subsurface resources; protection of
water quality in public water systems; remediation of contaminated sites, sediments and ground water; prevention
and control of indoor air pollution; and restoration of ecosystems. NRMRL collaborates with both public and
private sector partners to foster technologies that reduce the cost of compliance and to anticipate emerging
problems. NRMRL's research provides solutions to environmental problems by: developing and promoting
technologies that protect and improve the environment; advancing scientific and engineering information to
support regulatory and policy decisions; and providing the technical support and information transfer to ensure
implementation of environmental regulations and strategies at the national, state, and community levels.
This publication has been produced as part of the Laboratory's strategic long-term research plan. It is
published and made available by EPA's Office of Research and Development to assist the user community and
to link researchers with their clients.
E. Timothy Oppelt, Director
National Risk Management Research Laboratory
-------
-------
Contents
Section
Notice ^
Foreword • U1
Figures and Tables vi
Acronyms yu
Executive Summary ix
SITE Program Description ,.... 1
Introduction • 1
Program Design • • ........ 2
Program Implementation 2
Program Principles 3
FY 00 SITE Program Cost Savings and Vendor Benefits 7
Promotion of Innovative Technologies • • 7
Historical Program Cost Savings and Vendor Contracting - 8
Innovative Technology Highlights 13
SITE Program Case Studies 13
Case Study 1: Terra-Kleen Response Group Inc 13
Case Study 2: Iron Reactive Barrie 14
Case Study 3: Update 14
FY 00 Progress and Accomplishments 15
Demonstration Program • 15
Emerging Technology Program 16
Monitoring and Measurement Technologies Program 16
Future Direction ....: • 23
Introduction 23
Technology Areas of Primary Interest ; 23
MMT Program Areas of Interest 24
Partnerships for Success 24
Information Transfer 27
Appendices
A - SITE Projects (Alphabetically by Developer State) A-l
B - SITE Technology Demonstration Sites (Alphabetically by Demonstration Site State) ... B-l
C - Publications - Information Transfer Product Descriptions C-l
D - Electronic Technical Information Resources D-1
E - Glossary of Remediation Technologies E-l
-------
Figures
Number
1
Location of SITE demonstration and MMT projects
1
2 Superfund remedial actions: in situ technologies for source control . ........... .... 8
3 Cost savings estimated from RODs analysis by technology type ................. 10
4 Categorization of contracts awarded to SITE vendors following program participation 1 1
5 Total number of contracts awarded to SITE vendors after program participation ..... 12
6 Share of 3,229 total contracts awarded to SITE demonstration vendors by technology
type ---- ............................ . . ---- . ---- „ . . „ ____ ............ 12
7 Distribution of in situ and ex situ SITE demonstration projects at the end of FY 00 ... 16
Tables
Number page
1 SITE demonstration projects completed in FY 00 ............................ 17
\ -
2 SITE demonstration ongoing projects in FY 00 ............... . . . ; ........... 19
3 SITE MMT program demonstrations completed in FY 00 ...................... 21
4 Future SITE priority areas 2001-2005 ..................................... 25
5 Future contaminant emphasis areas 2000-2005 .............................. 25
6 SITE program projects FY 01 ............................. .............. 25
7 DNAPL testing site roadmap: media ...................................... 26
VI
-------
Acronyms
ANSI/ASQC
DNAPL
DOD
DOE
EGOS
EPA
ESTCP
ETV
FY
GPR
IDC
ITRC
MHI
MMT
NELP
NPL
NRC
ORD
PAHs
PCBs
REACHIT
RCI
SITE
TIO
TPH
VOC
American National Standard Institute, Assistance for Environmental Data
Collection and Environmental Technology Programs
Dense non-aqueous phase liquids
Department of Defense
Department of Energy
Environmental Council of States
Environmental Protection Agency
Environmental Security and Technology Certification Program
Environmental Technologies Verification
Fiscal year
Ground penetrating radar
Interagency DNAPL Consortium
Interstate Technology and Regulatory Cooperation
Mitsubishi Heavy Industries
Monitoring and Measurement Technologies
Navy Environmental Leadership Program
National Priorities List
National Research Council
Office of Research and Development
Polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons
Polychlorinated biphenyls
Remediation Characterization Innovative Technologies
White House Rapid Commercialization Initiative
Superfund Innovative Technology Evaluation
Technology Innovation Office
Total petroleum hydrocarbon
Volatile Organic Compound
VII
-------
-------
Executive Summary
The Superfund Innovative Technology Evaluation (SITE) Program has successfully
promoted the development, commercialization and implementation of innovative hazardous waste
treatment technologies for 15 years. SITE offers a mechanism for conducting joint technology
demonstration and evaluation projects at hazardous waste sites involving the private sector, EPA,
and other federal and state agencies. The program provides environmental decision-makers with
relevant data on new, viable remediation technologies that may have performance or cost advantages
compared to conventional treatment technologies. Since the initiation of the SITE Program in 1986,
cleanup of contaminated sites through the use of innovative technologies has resulted in an estimated
total inflated cost savings of over 2.6 billion dollars. The basis for estimation of cost savings is
discussed on Page 9 of this report.
During fiscal year (FY) 96, the SITE Program reviewed its approach to doing business and
determined that operational shifts in the program were necessary to identify and assist in the
development of the most sought-after technology types and treatment methods. Building on the
strengths of the existing program, such as demonstration design, quality assurance, and technology
transfer, the SITE Program has established a remediation problem focus that is driven by the needs
of the hazardous waste remediation community. The SITE Program has the following four
operating functions:
(1) program planning
(2) matching priority sites with innovative cleanup solutions
(3) technology field demonstrations
(4) information dissemination.
The SITE Program's vision is to remain the premiere organization in enhancing the
credibility and implementation of effective innovative remediation options.
The SITE Program continues to earn increased recognition as a leader in advancing
innovative technology development and commercialization. The program is participating with 146
remediation technology vendors. Through FY 00, the SITE Programhas successfully demonstrated
121 technologies, 13 of which were demonstrated during FY 00. Emphasis formerly placed on
technologies requiring the removal of soil or groundwater (ex situ) is gravitating to in situ
technologies that treat contamination in place. The SITE Program recognized this change and has
emphasized the development of in situ technologies. Of the 24 ongoing remediation technology
demonstrations, 22 are in situ. SITE'S Monitoring and Measurement Technologies (MMT) Program
has completed 45 projects to date, with 6 more in the planning stages. The Emerging Technology
Program has completed 73 projects.
IX
-------
To ensure that the program continues to meet the needs of the remediation community, the
SITE Program established a remediation stakeholder group. This group, which is composed of such
agencies as the Department of Defense and the Department of Energy, reviews innovative
technology applications and develops an environmental emphasis area list, which ensures that the
most pressing issues are prioritized and addressed. An example of multi-agency cooperation is the
Cape Canaveral Demonstration Project. This project will evaluate the effectiveness of three in situ
innovative remediation technologies for remediation of dense non-aqueous phase liquids (DNAPL)
in the subsurface. Two of these technologies have been demonstrated with the third currently being
evaluated.
SITE'S MMT Program is also addressing issues in the remediation community, and has
identified a need for more effective methods to evaluate sediment and soil contamination. In
response to this need, the MMT Program conducted demonstrations of two innovative sediment
sampling technologies in FY 00. The MMT Program is now addressing a similarly difficult
problem iri evaluating the performance of field total petroleum hydrocarbon (TPH) analysis
technologies. Through such relationships with other interested parties, the SITE Program
continually pursues opportunities to conduct cooperative technology demonstrations, thereby
reducing expenditures and further promoting innovative technologies. These factors assist the SITE
Program in attaining its primary goal - the expedited cleanup of the nation's most contaminated
sites.
-------
SITE Program Description
Introduction
The Environmental Protection Agency's
(EPA) Superfund Innovative Technology
Evaluation (SITE) Program has successfully
promoted the development, commercialization,
and implementation of innovative hazardous waste
site remediation and characterization technologies
for more than 15 years. The SITE Program is
currently composed of a Demonstration Program,
a Monitoring and Measurement Technology
(MMT) Program, and information transfer. Figure
1 below shows the locations of completed SITE
projects for both the Demonstration and MMT
Programs. SITE offers a mechanism for
conducting joint technology demonstration and
evaluation projects at hazardous waste sites
through the involvement of the private sector,
EPA, and other federal and state agencies.
Commercialization of innovative technologies is
assisted by providing potential users with high
quality, unbiased, defendable performance and
cost data. SITE promotes commercial application
of innovative technologies through an extensive
technology transfer program. This section will
describe each component of SITE, and the overall
pro gram principles used for planning and guidance
of the Program.
Figure 1. Location of all completed SITE Demonstration (•) and MMT (X) Projects (EPA Regions
shown in circles).
1
-------
Program Design
The SITE Program is currently comprised
of die following key elements:
/" Demonstration Program.
Evaluates and verifies cost and
performance of promising innovative
technologies at selected hazardous waste
sites to provide reliable performance, cost,
and applicability information for site
cleanup decision-making
/ Monitoring and Measurement
Technologies Program
Evaluates technologies that detect,
monitor, and measure hazardous and toxic
substances to provide more cost-effective
and accurate methods for producing real-
time data during site characterization and
remediation
/ Information Transfer Activities
Disseminates technical information,
including engineering, performance, and
cost data, to assist in removing barriers for
use of innovative and alternative
technologies
Program Implementation
SITE is a partnership between the public
and private sectors, where the costs and
responsibilities are shared by EPA, hazardous
waste site owners, and technology developers.
EPA enters into cooperative arrangements with
site owners and technology developers, under
which innovative technologies are demonstrated
at selected hazardous waste sites. EPA evaluates
the new technologies based on the demonstration
results, and compiles and publishes rigorous
engineering, performance, and cost data intended
to aid in decisions regarding the use of the
technologies at other hazardous waste sites. The
program generates credible and unbiased
technology cost and performance data needed by
remedial project managers, consultants, and other
environmental decision makers. EPA promotes
easy and rapid access to this information,
allowing project managers to make timely
decisions in selecting cleanup remedies.
Historically, one of the greatest factors
inhibiting the development and use of
innovative cleanup technologies has been the
lack of credible cost and performance data
during technology development at the
commercial scale. Understandably, many site
owners are unwilling to risk the use of innovative
technologies without assurance of success. By
addressing this need, SITE has aided in die first-
time field use of many technologies, contributing
to wider acceptance of a particular technology.
Providing this credible, unbiased cost and
performance data remains die foundation of
SITE.
The program is participating with 146
remediation technology vendors. The SITE
Program has successfully demonstrated 121
technologies, including 13 during FY 00.
Recognizing the need for a shift from ex situ
remediation, there are currently 22 in situ
technologies being developed/demonstrated out
of the Program's 24 total technologies. SITE's
Monitoring and Measuring Technologies (MMT)
Program has completed 45 projects to date, with
6 more in die planning stages. The Emerging
Technology program has completed 73 projects.
-------
The foundation of the SITE Program
is providing credible cost and
performance data.
Program Principles
To reduce expenditures and to remain at
the forefront of innovative technology
development, the SITE Program reviewed its
approach to doing business in fiscal year (FY)
1996. As a result, operational shifts in the
program were made to streamline the process of
identifying and developing the most sought-after
technology types and treatment . methods.
Building on the strengths of the existing program,
such as demonstration design, quality assurance,
and technology transfer, the SITE Program
shifted in FY 97 from a technology-driven focus
to a remediation problem focus, driven by the
needs of the hazardous waste remediation
community. EPA's vision of the SITE Program
is to remain the premiere program for enhancing
the credibility and implementation of effective
innovative remediation options.
In FY 00 the program continued to focus
on cost-effective solutions to common
remediation problems. The success of the
program's focus is illustrated in the strong
response to solicitations for technologies, and the
great interest in resource leveraging with the
SITE Program from federal and state agencies,
such as the Department of Defense (DOD),
Department of Energy (DOE), and State
environmental protection agencies.
The SITE Program is defined by the
following four operating principles: (1) program
planning, (2) matching priority sites with
innovative cleanup solutions, (3) technology field
demonstrations, and (4) information
dissemination.
Demonstration Program
In the Demonstration Program, innovative
cleanup technologies are field tested on hazardous
waste materials. SITE demonstrations are
conducted at hazardous waste sites, such as those
on the National Priorities List (NPL); Brownfield
sites; other non-NPL sites; or under simulated
hazardous waste site conditions at developer or
federal test and evaluation facilities. Engineering,
performance, and cost data are gathered on
innovative technologies. The data can then be
reviewed by potential users to evaluate
applicability to similar waste sites or to compare
effectiveness and costs to other alternatives. Data
collected during each field demonstration are used
to assess the performance of the technology, the
potential need for pre- or post-processing of the
waste, applicable types of wastes and
contaminated media (for example, soil, sludge,
water, sediment), potential operating problems,
limitations, and approximate capital, operating,
and maintenance costs.
The SITE Program annually solicits
applications for participation in the Demonstration
Pro gram from interested private firms and federal
and state agencies with responsibility for cleanup
operations at hazardous waste sites. Cooperative
arrangements or Memoranda of Understanding
form the relationship between the SITE Program
and the parties responsible for the host site. No
contractual agreement is arranged and no funds
are given to the site as part of this arrangement.
SITE provides in-kind service in the form of
project planning, testing, sampling/analytical
services, data analysis, and report writing.
Host site owners (see Appendix B for
sites categorized by state and location) are
responsible for providing necessary data related to
the hydro geology and other site conditions, results
of feasibility studies, and results pf waste analyses.
The owner is responsible for all logistical
requirements for the demonstration, such as
availability of utilities, access to land area at the
site large enough for equipment setup, elimination
or restriction of geographical or geological
hindrances, security provisions, and personnel
-------
Figure 2 presents the number of in situ
technologies as a percentage of all treatment
technologies for source control by fiscal year.
Over time, use of in situ technologies has been
increasing, as the trendline in Figure 2 shows.
A five-year moving average of the percentage
of in situ treatment technologies shows a
generally steady increase from 28 percent
(FY1985-1988) to 51 percent (FY1995-
1999). Several factors may play a role in this
upward trend in the-use of in situ treatment
technologies. Because in situ technologies
require no excavation, risk from exposure to
contaminated media is reduced, compared
with levels of risk associated with
technologies that do require excavation.
Further, for large sites where excavation and
materials handling for ex situ technologies can
be expensive, in situ technologies are often
more cost-effective.
Historical Program Cost Savings and Vendor
Contracting
Since its establishment in 1986, the SITE
Program has assisted in the development and use
of innovative technologies, resulting in substantial
cost savings for cleaning up contaminated sites.
The cost savings realized by federal facilities has
been estimated by analysis of RODs from 1993 -
1999; this analysis is described below. The SITE
Program has also assisted vendors in advancing
innovative technologies from the development
phase to full-scale application, and has promoted
greater acceptance of these technologies. The
following subsections provide examples of the
financial success of the SITE Program in terms of
federal cost savings, and vendor successes.
sot
Percentage of Source Control Treatment
Technologies that are In Situ
Fiscal Year
Figure 2. Superfund Remedial Actions: In Situ Technologies for
Source Control (FY 1985- FY 1999)
Source: U.S. EPA Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response, Innovative
Treatment Technologies Annual Status Report, Tenth Edition (S42-R-01-004)
8
-------
SITE Program Accomplishments - Federal
Cost Savings from RODs Analysis
Since 1993, the use of innovative
technologies has outpaced that of established
technologies, resulting in dramatic cost
savings. During 1996,1999,2000, and 2001,
the SITE Program collected information from
signed RODs (dated 1993-1999) in all 10
EPA Regions that selected an innovative
technology as the remedy. These technologies
include soil vapor extraction, thermal
desorption, bioremediation, phytoremediation,
surfactant flooding, and many other
technologies that have passed through the
Program. The data compiled by the SITE
Program allowed environmental managers to
compare innovative technologies to
conventional technologies (i.e., pump and
treat technologies, incineration, and
excavation and land filling), especially with
respect to cost. Documentation was obtained
from updated data on a total of 195 RODs
that selected innovative technologies for part
or all of the remediation. As the innovative
technologies discussed in this report become
more accepted and used as the baseline for
remediation, they will be viewed as
conventional technologies for comparison to
newer technologies. The SITE Program will
periodically evaluate whether technologies
that are no longer considered innovative
should be added to the baseline of
conventional technologies. The Program will
conduct this review in FY 2002 and thereafter
on a 5-year basis.
EPA guidance recommends that ROD
estimates assess remedial alternatives with an
accuracy of +50 percent to -30 percent. Of
the 195 RODs that selected innovative
technologies, 98 had sufficient information to
make a cost comparison between the selected
technology and a conventional technology.
Cost savings realized by using innovative
technologies for the 98 RODs was estimated
at $2.6 billion in 2000 dollars, with an average
percent savings per site of 72 percent. Only 13
of the 98 RODs reported that the innovative
technology was more expensive than or equal to
the established technology.
To estimate SITE Program net benefits,
the FY 93-99 RODs and the SITE Program
budget were inflated to the end of 2000 using
Consumer Price Index (CPI) inflation figures. The
total inflated cost savings for RODs dated 1993-
1999 was $2.6 billion, and the total inflated SITE
Program budget from 1986-2000 was $ 181
million. This comparison represents an estimated
inflated cost savings of over $ 2.4 billion for
various site cleanups.
Figure 3 shows a breakdown of savings by
technology type. Soil vapor extraction (SVE)
showed the highest savings of over $1.25 billion,
followed by $517 million for bioremediation. SVE
was one of the initial technologies accepted into
the SITE Program (in the late 1980s), and large
savings would therefore be expected from this
technology. Solvent extraction, thermal
desorption, and vitrification each accounted for
over $100 million in savings. Phytoremediation
and permeable reactive barriers are newer
technologies that are beginning to be chosen in
RODs, with five and four sites having specified
their use, respectively, with an associated cost
savings of $76 million as compared to
conventional technologies. The number of sites
and associated costs savings for phytoremediation
and treatment barrier sites are expected to increase
rapidly in coming years.
Historical Vendor Benefits
Technology vendors are a central part of
the SITE Program, providing remediation services
for sites requiring clean-up solutions. Vendors
experience various benefits by participating in the
SITE Program, namely increased exposure, market
share, technical acceptance, and recognition,
Increased acceptance of innovative technologies is
demonstrated by the level of commercial activity
experienced by SITE Program vendors. For
example, 1999 information indicated that since
completing SITE demonstration projects, vendors
-------
Soil Vapor Extraction
36 sites ($1,248)
Bioremediation
26 sites ($517)
Phytoremediation
5 sites ($18)
Treatment Barrier v;
4 sites ($58) VlMoailon.. 10 sites ($282)
Air Sparging
8 sites ($74)
Solvent Extraction
2 sites ($125)
Thermal Desorption
15 sites ($158)
Savings estimates based on comparison of innovative and conventional technologies for
FY 93-99 RODs. Savings shared equally among technologies when multiple
technologies were used and technology-specific costs were not available.
Figure 3. Cost savings estimated from RODs analysis by technology type
(millions of 2000 dollars).
received 1,921 remediation contracts, and
1,308 treatability studies (Figure 4). .
As part of a SITE Program evaluation
in 1999, 43 Demonstration Program vendors
provided information regarding company
revenues after completion of their
demonstration. Following participation in the
SITE Program, 58 percent of the responding
vendors were awarded commercial
remediation jobs using technologies
demonstrated in the SITE Program. Thirty-
three percent of the vendors were awarded
more than 10 contracts each. Over 35 percent
reported one or more international contracts,
identifying 37 countries where jobs were
contracted. Figure 5 provides a historical
perspective of growth in the number of
contracts awarded to SITE vendors from
1990 to 1999.
The 1999 Demonstration Program vendor
information has been broken down by technology
type to ascertain which technologies demonstrated
the greatest commercial success. Figure 6 shows
the share by technology type of the 3,229
remediation and treatability contracts awarded to
vendors. It is clear from this chart that soil vapor
extraction and bioremediation technologies have
had the most commercial success.
This trend from the vendor information is
consistent with the RODs analysis results which
were shown in Figure 2, providing two sources of
"Our involvement with the SITE
Program and especially our EPA
Project Officer, Ed Bates, has
been very successful. We
appreciate everyone's efforts and
the program's agenda."
10
-------
data to confirm the outstanding commercial
success of these technologies.
SITE Program participants who
responded indicated that they
experienced up to an 800% increase in
sales as a result of their involvement in
the SITE Program.
In addition to the 43 Demonstration
Program vendors, information was obtained in
1999 from 14 vendors that participated in the
MMT Program. This information clearly
demonstrated the benefits that vendors receive
from the program, indicating that 71 percent
of the vendors sold more than 25 units since
their demonstration in the SITE Program.
Over 64 percent of the vendors indicated that
their technologies were used on international
remediation projects. In total, the MMT vendors
reported selling over 3,550 units on over 900 jobs,
including 48 international jobs.
Overall, vendor information shows that
SITE technology developers in the Demonstration
and MMT Programs are achieving commercial
success for demonstrated technologies. The
impact of the SITE Program continues to grow
over time, as illustrated by the consistent growth
in vendor contracts over the last decade (Figure
5).
3500
Treatability Studies Remediation Jobs
International
Contracts
Total Jobs
Figure 4. Categorization of contracts awarded to SITE vendors following program
participation. (Source: 1999 vendor information)
11
-------
3SOO ..:
3000
2500
•i
a
g: 2000 •
tS
eg
£
a
CJ 1500 •
•3
0
£
1000 •
500 •
0 •
225
150 '
410
: •:•-• ''ll
M
3229
2874
1895
533
•- -x- *••
•
1x3
> * ' §
... s
• ^
i » »' "
^% v%
\*?* .
r'''l
\ L
^-->
'\jf:
: ^ ••
^
'• •"
jw. \
lO"
j;
: ,\™
I v
;,ss ,
\ x"
G:'
^ -\
^
% s :
v- :
'^\1
fff. f I
^ \ i
0\ ;
' v •
f f :
•• * -
%w j
%:
*J
^'^ •
-!• ;
''-'^ ^
^ »j
[
Decenher 1990 October 1991 March 1992 Jure 1994 Jure 1996 Jure 1998 March2000
Figure 5. Total number of contracts awarded to SITE vendors after program participation
(Source: 1990-2000 vendor information)
Stabilization /
Solidification
20%
Solvent
Extraction-
2%
Filtration
7%
Oxidation
2%
Soil Washing
2%
Vitrification
2%
Other
1%
Electro-chemical
1%
Chemical
Treatment
10%
Thermal Desorption
2%
Soil Vapor
Extraction
29%
Bio rem ediatio n
22%
Figure 6. Share of 3,220 total contracts awarded to SITE Demonstration vendors by
technology type (Source: 2000 vendor information)
12
-------
Innovative Technology Highlights
SITE Program Case Studies
This section presents case studies of
innovative remediation technologies for vendors
that have participated in the SITE Program
through the Demonstration Program (case studies
1 and 2).
The case studies provide brief descriptions
on the use and status of representative
technologies and, where available, general
information on the cost of applying each
technology. These case studies represent the
SITE Program's approach to promoting
innovative technologies by identifying user needs.
In response to user needs, the Demonstration
Program assessed the performance of solvent
extractions technology for treatment of PCB -
contaminated soil and sediment and iron reactive
barrier technology for in situ groundwater
remediation.
The technologies presented in these case
studies are typical of the SITE Program and
represent SITE'S remediation problem focus,
which is driven by the needs of the hazardous
waste community. These technologies represent
real or potential solutions to actual cleanup
problems faced by the environmental community.
Case Study 1: Terra-KIeen Response Group
Inc. (Solvent Extraction Technology)
Terra-KIeen Response Group, Inc. is the
world leader in PCB-contaminated soil and
sediment treatment with solvent extraction
technology and has successfully completed more
jobs than any other company in their field.
Recently, Terra-KIeen began international
operations by licensing its proprietary technology
to Mitsubishi Heavy Industry (Tokyo, Japan), and
is teaming with Canadian partners for work in
Canada. In addition, Terra-KIeen is currently
discussing application of its technology in Europe
with several European companies. Terra-
KIeen's mobile, on-site extraction technology
provides environmentally safe, cost-effective
treatment of soil and sediment.
The reliability and performance of the
technology has been studied by several U.S.
government agencies. Terra-KIeen has been
granted a United States nationwide
commercial operations permit from the United
States Environmental Protection Agency
(U.S. EPA), and participated in many U.S.
government verification programs including
four Superfund Innovative Technology
Evaluation (SITE) programs, the Navy
Environmental Leadership Program (NELP),
and the White House Rapid
Commercialization Initiative (RCI).
Waste Applicability
Terra-KIeen's patented technology
uses a common industrial, non-toxic solvent,
and operates at ambient temperature and
pressure. Its modular design enables cost-
effective treatment of small and large waste
volumes. The process has been successfully
used in the full-scale treatment of
polychlorinatedbiphenyls (PCBs), chlorinated
pesticides (such as DDT and toxaphene),
polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs),
chlorinated volatile organic contaminants
(VOCs), and petroleum waste.
Status
Mitsubishi Heavy Industries (MHI) has
announced its entry into the soil remediation
business. With the multi-year license and
technical assistance agreement MHI has
signed with Terra-KIeen Response Group,
Inc., MHI projects a sales amount of at least 2
13
-------
billion Japanese yen within 2 or 3 years and
regards solvent extraction of contaminants in soil
as one of its new core businesses.
Case Study 2: Iron Reactive Barrier (In-Situ
Groundwater Remediation)
The U.S. EPA began working with the
U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) in 1995 to
characterize a contaminated groundwater plume
at DOE's Rocky Rats site outside Denver, CO.
DOE is working to achieve closure of the Rocky
Flats site by 2006, and considers remediation of
this plume a crucial element of site closure.
Based on the results of site characterization and
ongoing commitment to utilize innovative
treatment technologies, DOE decided to
remediate the contaminated groundwater through
use of a passive barrier.
Groundwater contamination in this area
originated from a former waste drum storage
area used by DOE in the late 1950s. Consisting
of shallow groundwater collected in a French
drain and tunneled to the reactors at a flow rate
of 0.5 to 2.0 gallons per minute, the plume
extends horizontally approximately 220 feet. Its
primary contaminants are uranium and volatile
organic compounds (VOCs), including carbon
tetrachloride, tetrachloroethene, trichloroethene,
and vinyl chloride. Following excavation and
removal of the contamination source in 1997, the
passive barrier (designed by EriviroMetal
Technologies, Inc.) was installed in the summer
of 1998.
Waste Applicability
This passive barrier system requires no
operational energy and minimal maintenance,
which results in a substantial cost sayings over
use of an alternative pump and treat system.
Performance assessment of the barrier indicates
that the barrier system is removing
approximately 99% of the plume's primary
contaminants.
This barrier system begins with the
downgrade-side collection of groundwater in a
subsurface hydraulic barrier (French drain) lined
with high-density polyethylene.: The drain is
located in the unconfined aquifer at depths
ranging from 8 to 15 feet below ground surface.
Ground water is diverted through the drain to
piping that transfers it by gravity to the
reactive media treatment system. The system
consists of two 10-foot (wide) by 5-foot
(deep) cylindrical reactors in series, each of
which contains 337 cubic feet of granular,
reactive (zero-valent) iron. The reactors were
installed below surface grade and were sized
to treat groundwater at a flow rate of 1 gallon
per minute for a duration of 20 hours. In the
reactors, VOCs are dechlorinated to
nonchlorinated hydrocarbons, and uranium in
the oxidized state (U6"1") is converted to
uranium in the reduced state (U4*) and
precipitated. Following treatment, ground
water exits the barrier system directly through
surface water that flows to retention ponds.
Status
EPA and DOE have monitored the
influent and effluent of this barrier system on
a quarterly basis since September 1998. In
addition, water samples in 1-foot increments
throughout the reactive media have been
collected since project start-up to monitor
containment breakthrough. To date,
breakthrough of VOCs and uranium has been
confined to the top 3 feet of the first reactor in
the treatment sequence.
Case Study 3: Update
ITT Night Vision (In situ Enhanced
Bioremediaiton of Groundwater) was
highlighted in last year's Report to Congress
and will not be described in great detail here.
However, it is desired to provide an update on
the status of the technology at the site. After
the SITE Demonstration was completed in late
1999, the site owner, ITT Night Vision,
proposed to expand the technology from a
pilot system to a full-scale system that would
treat a much larger area of contamination,
including the contamination source. US EPA
Region 3 agreed with the approach, and in
January 2000, the full scale system was
brought on line. Results from the SITE
Demonstration provided much insight and
understanding into the various phenomena
occurring in the subsurface and thus greatly
aided in the design of the full-scale system.
14
-------
FY 00 Progress and Accomplishments
Demonstration Program
The objective of the Demonstration
Program is to conduct field demonstrations and
high-quah'typerformanceverifications.of viable
remediation technologies at sites that pose high
risks to human health and/or the environment,
are common throughout a region or the nation,
or where existing remediation methods are
inadequate, unsafe, or too costly. The SITE
Program solicits applications annually from
those responsible for cleanup operations at
hazardous waste sites. A panel of SITE
Program scientists, engineers, and associated
environmental experts reviews the applications
to identify those technologies that best
represent solutions for the most pressing
environmental problems. The resulting data
and reports are intended for use by decision-
makers in selecting remediation options and for
increasing credibility in innovative
applications. ;
Over the past 15 years,. SITE has earned
increased recognition as a leader in advancing
innovative technology development and
commercialization and has participated
cooperatively with more than 146 technology
developers. Through FY 00, the SITE Program
has successfully demonstrated 121
technologies, 13 of which were demonstrated
during FY 00. These demonstrations have
provided a tremendous amount of information
on the performance, costs, and applicability of
innovative cleanup technologies, which greatly
assists managers of environmental remediation
projects in developing appropriate and,effective
cleanup solutions. SITE has been responsive to
the user community during this time, and has
recently focused on the need for in situ
remediation technologies to more cost-
effectively remediate sites. As shown in Figure
7,75 completed SITE projects have been ex situ
and 45 in situ. Of the 24 ongoing or
demonstrations, 22 are in situ, while 2 are ex
situ.
UNPROVEST
TECHNOLOGY
Field demonstration and evaluation of in
situ technologies may require several months or
years of data collection. This is in contrast to
field demonstrations of ex situ technologies
where field work can be completed in 1-3
weeks. Based on the SITE Program's increased
emphasis on in situ technologies, the number of
ongoing demonstrations will likely increase,
with fewer moving from ongoing to completed
status each year than in the past. It is estimated
that six field demonstrations will be completed
each year.
During FY 00, 13 new innovative
technologies were evaluated in the field.
Completed demonstration projects are listed in
Table 1, and ongoing projects are provided in
Table 2. All completed and ongoing projects in
15
-------
the Demonstration Program, ETP, and MMT
Program are listed in Appendices A and B.
Emerging Technology Program (1987-1995)
Nine solicitations were issued from
November 1987 (E01 Solicitation) to July 1995
(E09 Solicitation). A total of 77 technology
development projects were initiated under the
ETP, and 66 projects were successfully
completed during this same period. Eighteen of
the former ETP projects entered into the
Demonstration Program.
Monitoring and Measurement Technologies
Program
The MMT Program has leveraged its
resources with EPA's Environmental
Technology Verification Program. These two
programs, known collectively as the Consortium
for Site Characterization Technologies, have
developed a partnership with the DOE.
Resources from the SITE Program are used
solely for those technologies addressing
hazardous waste. This partnership will help to
address the demands on the MMT Program and
reduce the backlog of applications submitted by
developers of innovative technologies.
Planned
Completed
5l?C\W??Vlls;'£P§xC^x'fNN'C'''^ <."*-%^v, ^
0
I In Situ m Ex Situ
16
-------
Table 1. SITE Demonstration Project Completed in FY 00
Developer
Location
WA
NM
MA
CA
NJ '
Ontario,
Canada
CA
VT
'-
FL
Developer
OSLlw.
Commodore
Advanced
Sciences,
Inc.
Inc. i
Eco Mat, Inc.
In.v3f0.gfca, ;
Inc. ;
EnviroMetal
Technologies
,Inc.
iE***
Green
Mountain
Laboratories
• T$. fih,D-
IS-&HO&W-
Eyjivji^pin^iSipt
aad- -
: Engineering-
' Laboratory
IT
Corporation
Technology
CES designed aad built a, S& Ptosfe'Bea&ig &ptHAPL to Soat to the top of Ihe^atamted 20n^ied«eeg tfe^
size of this spriear zane» and caa Increase the feiolag|eal.aetivjty in fli^
This technology applies enhanced biodegradation of PCBs in
contaminated soil at the Beede Waste Oil Site.*
SttrfacfiaHl-enhaaced aquifer f«medM»g "ajt neiiteaj fiuDyancy allows
th$ subsarface. Th« iecjjnalogy iitcarpqrafes a eosojventto provide
afet»ifal •btjoyan&.y of tmteMtWet to j?3K>vi(fo"v^ti(5alin^ation of
contamiQa^Dn uj fljfe'stibsurlace.
IT designed and operated a system to inject potassium permanganate
below ground into a zone contaminated with TCE and DNAPL at
Kennedy Space Center, FL. The system will inject the oxidant
throughout a 50 by 75 foot plot down 46 feet to the aquitard.
KMNO4 oxidized the contaminants toform benign byproducts
carbon dioxide, manganese dioxide, potassium ions, chloride ions
and hydrogen ions.
Site Location
Q^GtaaemA,
Pearl Harbor, HI
•EtWttofcHI^
Bendena, KS
> •• "•
Rocky Flats, CO
Plaistow, NH
? MSlfocd, NH
Cape Canaveral,
FL
17
-------
Table 1. SITE Demonstration Project Completed in FY 00 (continued)
Developer
Location
Developer
Technology
Site Location
CO
System^, |n,c,
. s
i?9Ct«n4- W etilttffiB-to setiuei^the leading, of Je^ at cottfatBinated
sJtes> Thfc tmJtujes a«'tow» iift labotatiary setiiiig,
0U ; Aurora, C£>
ia
CO
Pintail
Systems, Inc.
Isolated indigenous organisms capable of remineralizing arsenic are
grown and augmented in lab cultures.
Jackson, CA;
Aurora, CO
w
iiarnlcftl treatment process, can fee ajjpiiadto
^ soils., waste 'd&dirfhw mtKEMs cotttslftiftg tead a^dotber fo^asy
*A treatability study was performed, a full demonstration project was not completed..
18
-------
Table 2. SITE Demonstration Ongoing Projects in FY 00
Developer
Location
Developer
Technology
Site Location
., ^$fiec|fto^ly¥ trees weje.-ijtlti?eti'il;D degcacl^ organic
eo»la«aftsafet« & tfcaw rjatfara .sMof 1*6
WA
E&C Williams
Keeco
This project involved chemical stabilization of mercury mining
wastes. Large scale column leaching tests were conducted in
cooperation with EPA's Mine Waste Technology Program.
Several vendor treatments to stabilize Hg iri-situ were evaluated
including the use of silicates, sulfides, and phosphates.
Butte, MT*
LA
Eteptrtikiafejfc'g soil pKfc&ss ex.tr^
-------
Table 2. SITE Demonstration Ongoing Projects in FY 00 (continued)
Developer
Location
Developer
Technology
Site Location
CO
Region 8 and
State of
Colorado
This project involved multiple innovative passive and
semi passive mine drainage technologies. Technologies
evaluated included the Aquafix lime despensing water
wheel with retention in settling tanks, an oxidation pond, a
SAPS system, and a limestone lined channel.
Summitville,
CO
.MA
LLC
"This JJH&B t<&toaotogy titiltees cortda^ve tteatbii firom
Jieater wells t& volatilize organic cipntarnaiants in the soil.
the co&taauRatrts are &ea f&moved with iteater/vao'upi
wells. ' 1 " '*;;, "- ;, ^
Mbtattain
» CO
OH
U.S. EPA,
NRMRL
Alternate Cover Assessment Program (ACAP) - The
ACAP is a cooperative partnership of industry,
government, and research institutions that will evaluate
evapotranspiration and break cover systems. The program
is expected to provide cost-effective alternative cover
designs, and assist in the development of designs at other
sites.
12 sites around
the nation
WA
WSder , ^
Consteacfioii
Co. • s , '
MaCdsft Js a modified aspMt system for primary, use as at*
exposed hydraulic contaioraent cover system. When
comfeteed wMi selected aggtegates fie-mauMai caat*s
a$edjas. a ^airier layer or as a drainage layerl Together, -
&&TOaterJat can fooa. a. multilayer d^ned cap atop
IarMfilIgsor contaminated soils.
; Dover, DBaod
'Elgin, IL
* Column and humidity cell tests on waste from sulphur bank mercury mine located in Clear Lake, CA.
To further advance the MMT Program,
a stakeholder group was formed to assist in
outreach activities and in the selection of
technologies. An advocates program involving
the EPA Regional offices was also established
to assist in the MMT demonstration process and
to ensure that the products of the
demonstrations address issues relevant to EPA.
Demonstrations in FY 00
During FY 00, field demonstrations
were completed on seven total petroleum
hydrocarbon (TPH) measurement technologies
(Table 3). The technologies were tested by
analyzing TPH-contaminated soil samples
collected from five areas located in three
regions of the United States.
Ongoing Demonstrations
The MMT Program has identified a
number of possible candidate technologies for
demonstration in FY01. One category of
technology is field portable X-ray fluorescence
spectrometry for the detection of metals in soil.
Metals contamination in soil continues to be an
important environmental concern at many
Superfund sites. This technology category was
originally demonstrated under the SITE
Program in 1994. Most of the XRF
technologies have evolved well past their
performance capabilities demonstrated in mid-
1990. A few of the companies and their
products are no longer in existence and there are
a couple of new entries in the market. There is
also a continuing interest in the detection and
20
-------
measurement of dense, non-aquenous phase
liquids (DNAPLs) in the subsurface.
Geophysical techniques, such as ground-
penetrating radar (GPR), have the potential for
use as a non-invasive, remote detection method.
Table 3. SITE MMT Program Demonstrations Completed in FY 00
Developer
Location
Developer
Technology
Site
Location
CA
Reme&AisP1 Total Peteotewm f&&ewj«a$ott S&rter K& developed T>y
CtiS&tetncs and A2OTL ir/canjtekkra with Shell Kesearch. Lt, Is based
Pott--- -
HEaerieritfe,
'CA
Ltd,
cdloiimetry for measuring total petroleum
CT
Dexsil
Corporation
PetroFLAG™ Hydrocarbon Test Kit for Soil is manufactured by
Dexsil® Corporation and is based on emulsion turbidimefry. The kit
uses a proprietary, nonpolar organic solvent mixture that is composed
of alcohols, primarily methanol, for extraction of petroleum
hydrocarbons from soil samples.
Port
Hueneme,
CA
Systems
C^qpacaiian & feasfed On ultraViale); Suoi'BSeeiiee speeteoscojiy.
Ssnoscope; wes a xeaon l«s|> to,px«to«3e, a mti4ww$eQ$&
Ultraviolet ligkt beam that pa^s^s throUgri aa ajfeatarSors nionptjhrinnatoE
Post
Ha
CA
CA
OCMA-350 Oil Content Analyze? developed: by flDiiba Ins&BHients, '
I&c, is based on in&afed; analysfe using, a js^b^te-'besitt, fe*d-
Port
Hoe
CA,
pelfolwra hyi4rocarfeo(K in. soil, "
NH
SiteLAB
Corporation
SiteLab ® Analytical Test Kit UVF-3100A is based on ultraviolet
fluorescence spectroscopy. The UVF-3100A includes a portable
fluorometer fitted with excitation and emission filters that are
appropriate for TPH analysis of soil samples.
Port
Hueneme,
CA
£>E
aad is based OQ a cDmlimatifln af immanifiaa^ay (spBciJically emyms*
Uftfced imflSBiioseifbeat assay) attdisolodawtty, Tf* devi<^ as0s
jnethariolfpr-escfrBciiorf of petroleum hydrocarbons ftota soil samples*
'Port
Hwe
CA
CT
Wilks
Enterprise, Inc.
Infracal® TOG/TPH Analyzer, Models CVH and HATR-T developed by
Wilfcs Enterprise, Inc. includes a single-beam, fixed-wavelength, NDIR
filter-based spectrophotometer with a dual detector system for
measuring total petroleum hydrocarbons in soil.
Port
Hueneme,
CA
21
-------
-------
Future Direction
Introduction
During FY 00, the SITE Program
continued to emphasize the importance of first
selecting a site and, secondly, evaluating one or
more appropriate innovative technologies. The
selection of these sites and technologies is
important in meeting the needs of those
responsible for selecting and implementing
hazardous waste cleanup.
Over the past four years, 24 four sites and
30 technologies have been selected under the host
site solicitation. A wide range of representation
ensures that the most pressing issues are
prioritized and addressed. These sites were
selected by a review group comprised of
representatives from the following organizations:
• DOD Environmental Security and Technology
Certification Program (ESTCP)
• DOE Office of Science and Technology
• EPA Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response
• EPA Regional Offices
• Interstate Technology and Regulatory.Cooperation
(TTRC) Workgroup
The selected projects are a mix of biological and
physical/chemical treatment processes, and the
majority involve in situ treatment.
In response to stakeholders demand, the
MMT Programinitiated a series of demonstrations
designed to evaluate innovative sampling and
analysis technologies, • J[ri FY 98, :soil and soil gas
sampling technologies were evaluated. InFY99,
a field demonstration of sediment sampling
technologies was conducted. In FY 00, the
program investigated the applicability of seven
TPH measurement devices. These projects are
designed to address ongoing difficulties in
obtaining representative samples at defined depths,
or obtaining accurate analytical results using less
expensive and less complex equipment.
Technology Areas of Primary Interest
The areas of primary interest remain an
important part of appropriate site selection.
Stakeholder groups, like those used in selecting
the sites and technologies, identify these areas
with technical staff within ORD. This helps ensure
that the most pressing needs are met.
In FY 00 the SITE Program continued to
emphasize the need for technologies capable of in
situ remediation of dense non-aqueous phase
liquids (DNAPLs) in difficult geological
formations. This continues to be a theme through
the remediation community as a whole. The
program continues to evaluate in situ thermal and
chemical oxidation type technologies under a
broad array of geological conditions. In addition
effective remediation technologies for metals in
soils, treatment of recalcitrant compounds, and the
general need for in situ treatment remain high on
the priority list.
Because of technical difficulties related to
sediment remediation, this is another area where
the remediation community would benefit from
new processes, approaches or less expensive
methods for treatment. In situ treatment,
sampling, and containment are technology areas of
interest to be addressed by both the MMT and
Demonstration Programs, An increase of projects
in these areas is expected in the future. Tables 4
and 5 outline the site, priority and contaminant
areas of interest of the SITE Program, and Table
23
-------
6 describes the demonstrations that are planned for
FY01.
MMT Program Areas of Interest
Emerging field analytical areas which will
be included in the MMT Program include in situ
monitoring technologies, especially for ground
water. Specific areas of interest include detection
of DNAPLs, chemical sensors for detection of
VOCs, geophysical tools for detection of
contaminants and subsurface hydrogeologic
characteristics, and the reevaluation of field
portable x-ray fluorescence. The benefit in testing
non-invasive techniques for site characterization is
the claimed ability of a variety of geophysical
techniques to map a DNAPL plume without the
need for drilling wells. Evaluation of geophysical
technologies will be very complex and will likely
be conducted at controlled spill facilities.
There are a number of biological tests for
toxicity in soils and water that are relevant to
ecological risk assessment, and that may be useful
in waste water and drinking water treatment
facilities. A demonstration is planned for FY 01 in
order to evaluate the effectiveness of new
biological assessment techniques that may be
highly sensitive and inexpensive test methods.
Since the program has matured, a number
of developers in the area of X-ray fluorescence
and gas chromatography / mass spectrometry have
made significant improvements in their technology
and will be candidates for abbreviated
demonstrations which will evaluate the
improvements.
Partnerships for Success
Federal to Federal Interface
The SITE Program recognizes the
importance of cooperation between federal
agencies to find common areas of need and
interest. Federal to federal interface is an
important aspect to enhancing :the benefits of
technology demonstrations. It allows for
leveraging resources, expedited' cost and
performance information exchange and cross
fertilization of technical expertise between
agencies. In addition this type of collaboration
encourages the use of innovative approaches by
federal end users in a more expedited manner and
has resulted in implementation at other site
locations. In common environmental areas of
interest this type of joint research is of great
benefit to all parties involved.
One example of this type of approach is the
Interagency DNAPL Consortium (IDC). The IDC
at the Cape Canaveral site is comprised of EPA,
DOE, DOD, and NASA. The objective of the
group is to conduct side-by-side demonstrations of
3 innovative technologies for DNAPL
remediation. The demonstration is being
conducted at Cape Canaveral Air Station Launch
Complex 34. In FY 2000, 2 technologies have
been demonstrated and-the third was scheduled to
begin demonstration in the summer of FY 01.
DNAPL remediation in the subsurface,
particularly in more complex geological
conditions, remains a priority area for EPA as
well as other federal agencies. The SITE Program
is carrying out multiple field demonstrations in a
variety of geological formations. This approach
parallels the theme set in the 1997 National
Research Council (NRC) report titled Innovation
in Groundwater and Soil Cleanup
(www.NAP.EDV/readingroom ISBN #0309-
06358-2). A roadmap of the SITE demonstration
based on the NRC study is presented in Table 7.
In FY 01 - 02 the SITE program will be focusing
on the more difficult to treat geological formations
such as fractured bedrock. This will be the
nation's first large scale attempt to address residual
DNAPL residual in fractured media. It is expected
that different types of technologies may be needed
to treat varying complex formations. These joint
projects could potentially identify several
innovative options or approaches to solve
environmental problems where currently no
solutions exists.
24
-------
Table 4. Future Site Priority Areas 2000 - 2005
Mining Issues/Acid Mine Drainage
Manufactured Gas Plants
Sediments
Wood Treating
Pesticide Manufacturers/Formulators
Table 5. Future Contaminant Emphasis Areas 2000 - 2005
Groundwater/Soils ,
DNAPL/ Chlorinated Solvents
PCBs
Arsenic, Mercury or other Heavy Metals
Sediments
Pesticides
PCBs
PAHs .
Arsenic, Mercury, or .other Heavy Metals
Tabled. SITE Program Projects FY 01
Site Name/
Location
Jones Island CDF
Milwaukee Harbor
Fox River Superfimd
Site
Summitville, CO
Sulphur Bank Mercury
Mine
Clear Lake, C A
Rocky Mountain
Arsenal
Rocky Mountain
Arsenal
Edwards AFB
Cape Canaveral
Cocoa Beach, FL
Loring AFB
Aroostook, ME
Pearl Harbor Naval
Base
Pearl Harbor Naval
Base
Technology
Phytoremediation .
Thermal Treatment
Multiple innovative passive
drainage techniques
Chemical stabilization
In situ biological enhancement
In situ heat
In situ steam
In situ steam
In situ steam
Multiple in situ capping
techniques
Electrokinetics
Project Description
Treatment of sediments
contaminated with PAHs, PCBs
for beneficial reuse
PCB contaminated sediment
treatment for beneficial reuse
Treatment of acid mine drainage
Stabilization of mercury mining
waste
Treatment of organic
contaminants with hydrogen
release compounds
Treatment of
Hexachlorocyclopentadiene soil
contamination
DNAPL Treatment in fractured .
bedrock
Groundwater and soils
contaminated with TCE
DNAPL treatment in fractured
bedrock
Evaluate biological and
stabilization/detoxification
techniques
Mobilization and extraction of
lead
Proposed Schedule
Field demonstration FY 01-
03
Field demonstration Spring
FY01
Demonstration FY01-03
Column and humidity
testing FY 01
Demonstration FY01-02
Demonstration FY01-02
Field demonstration FY01-
02
Technology
demonstration FY 01-02
Demonstration to begin
summer FY 01
Demonstration planning to
begin summer FY 01
Demonstration summer
FY01
25
-------
Table 7. DNAPL Testing Site Roadmap: Media (Based on NRC Report, 1997)
More
Difficult
Treatment Difficulty
i
Less
Difficult
Media
Clay/Fractured soil
and bedrock
Heterogeneous
(saturated)
Heterogeneous
(unsaturated)
Fine grained soil
(saturated)
Coarse/medium
grained (saturated)
Fine (unsaturated)
Coarse/Medium
grained (unsaturated)
Location
Edwards AFB
Loring AFB
Roosevelt Mills,
Vernon, CT
Pearl Harbor
PortofRidgefield,
Washington State
Cape Canaveral
Contaminant
TCE
PCE/TCE
PCE/TCE
Fuel
Creosote
TCE
Technology
Steam injection
Steam injection
In Situ oxidation
Surfactant flush
Steam injection
Resistive heating
Dynamic underground
stripping
In situ oxidation
Federal to State Interface
Where there are common environmental
areas of interest, cooperation between federal and
state agencies and cooperation within the federal
government are essential. The ITRC provides a
mechanism to interact with .multiple state
regulatory agencies and state specific verification
programs. Direct interaction with multiple state
agencies provides many benefits to the SITE
Program. State regulatory agencies are also faced
with the difficult problems associated with
hazardous waste clean-up. In addition, the
acceptance of the results of a technology
evaluation in one state may hot be readily
accepted by other states due to the variation of
environmental regulations between states. Thus,
interaction among multiple states on SITE
projects can help overcome this challenge by
bringing state agencies together at the onset of the
project. This planning process enables the SITE
program to address technical issues and questions
from numerous states in one field demonstration.
Working cooperatively with multiple states also
promotes efficiency in program spending by
avoiding duplication of efforts. With this way of
planning a project, technical issues and questions
from numerous states can be addressed in one field
demonstration and duplicaton of efforts is avoided.
The ITRC currently has several
workgroups that crosscut the SITE Program's
environmental priority areas of interest. The
various groups are as follows: 1) Passive Barrier
Workgroup, 2) DNAPL Workgroup, 3)
Phytoremediation Workgroup 4) Sediment
Workgroup. These groups are invited to
participate in SITE Program demonstration
projects. Groups choose to participate at a level
required by the objectives of the workgroup.
Involvement of the workgroups allows for better
26
-------
planning and exchange of technical requirements
early in the project planning.
Information Transfer
Information transfer is accomplished
through a number of mechanisms. While the
Internet information distribution is an effective
mechanism, published documentation, meetings,
and conferences remain an essential part of
technical information dissemination. Coordination
with existing remediation workgroups and
programs is also essential. The SITE Program
continues to work cooperatively with numerous
programs, such as DOD's ESTCP Program, the
Environmental Council of States (ECOS)
sponsored ITRC, and as stated previously plans a
much stronger technical relationship with the
DOE's Office of Science and Technology.
Internet service allows for quick and easily
accessible information, and saves time and costs in
publication. The SITE Program converted all
earlier publications to electronic format and has
made those documents available through the
SITE homepage. General program information is
available as well as quarterly reports, most recent
documents, programhighlights and the technology
profiles of the vendors participating in the
program. As a result of the homepage, the
number of documents printed has been reduced by
75%. According to Web Server Statistics, the
monthly average number of hits for electronic
information solicited from the SITE homepage
over the last year was 1353. Numerous requests
come from outside the US, reflecting an increased
global interest in the SITE Program.
In addition, one of the most requested
documents, the SITE Technology Profiles, is now
available in a CD-ROM format with strong search
capabilities. This document is updated
periodically and new ways for making it more user
friendly and more easily accessible will continue to
be explored.
The program will continue pursuing and
supporting the development of document
summaries in areas where data exists on a variety
of technologies or applications. The information is
useful in providing the user community with
comparative technicalinformation and costs within
an area. Documentation will continue for some
time since many of the technologies are in situ and
highly complex. In situ technology evaluations are
tested over varying lengths of time, with a
minimum time of 3-6 months. Most are evaluated
for one year. In the case of phytoremediation,
growing seasons span 2-3 years. The summaries
will need updating as the technologies mature and
information becomes available.
http://www.epa.gov/ORD/SITE
27
-------
-------
Appendix A
SITE PROJECTS
(Alphabetically by Developer State)
A-l
-------
SITE PROJECTS - BY DEVELOPER STATE
State
Alabama - ,:
Alaska
Adz&aa - , "
^
^
California
Developer
> s •> s •• ••
CMSJ^eatch
'Cctfgdrafikia ,,-*'" o
BffK»&|shmR, M+ "
Arctic Foundations
Anchorage, AK
Brice Envkonmental
Service Corp.
(BESCORP)
Fairbanks, AK
Mion»Sta|fi>x;-',
Un^tsJ^jT ' - "
'iWnpa/A^r /," - '
ff f •• "•
•• f •• - s
s vl ;, ?%
? s \ "•
^Oroe^^ojffl^t}?
SiScat$T«i?tei.o}ogy
'Co5fppral|oH) - '
iSegtedafe,^*. ^s
Analytical and
Remedial Technology,
Lie.,
MUpitas, CA
Berkeley
Environmental
Restoration Center
(formerly Udell
Technologies, Lie.)
Emeryville, CA
Binax Corp., Antox
Division
Sunnyville, CA
COGNIS.lhc.
Santa Rosa, CA
Eco Mat, Lie.
Hayward, CA
Energy and
Environmental
Research. Corporation
Irvine, CA
Technology
' \
BsstelifeClas ',
dit0ni'a.tograph
" ;' '
Freeze Barrier
Soil Washing
Plant
Bjotoe^aljiJto
Oxidation and Air ,
Stripping , ,
' '
'$&&&&<&«&?
SjtaistUz«^0»
'Yteatrii^jit-^ ;, s>
-. s-.-r-vss<
Automated
Sampling and
Analytical
Platform
Li situ Enhanced
Extraction
Imunoassay for
PCB in Soil
Biological/
Chemical
Treatment
Biological
Denitrification
Hybrid Fluidized
Bed System
Contact
H, Ashley
Paj^
aj&tfTWil
EdYarmak
907-562-2741
Craig Jones
907-452-2512
(k^sts
]SO^es4S2$
-SttlotBejwtmiJ
mostyxito -
S^henltelgesf"
Si?«fr-LaRS«tt
602^4a^O.,N,
Gary Hopkins
408-263-8931
Kent Udell
510-642-2928
Steve Collins
510-643-1300
Richard
Lankow
408-752-1353
Steve Rock
U.S. EPA
513-569-7149
KimHalley
510-783-5885
Richard
Koppang
714-859-8851
Program
Mtmtei»g atiid
Memsarfenient
TwJffiPlQ^eB
Demonstration
Demonstration
Emetgtaji' ^
"Jechnotagj?
s %
BejnDjjsAratlqjj
^ ..
c ' •• y ?
,'
Monitoring and
Measurement
Technologies
Demonstration
Monitoring and
Measurement
Technologies
Emerging
Technology ,
Demonstration
Emerging
Technology
Status
Co&ipfefed. !
. 19S2; |
Completed
1998
Completed
1992
C&mpfeteii
,tt» ,
Completed •
!s«80
Completed
1991
Completed
1993
Completed
1992
Completed
1995
Completed
2000
Completed
1992
A-2
-------
SITE PROJECTS - BY DEVELOPER STATE (continued)
State
California
continued)
Developer
Energy and
Environmental
Research Corporation
Irvine, CA
Environmental
Biotechnologies
Montara, CA
EPOC Water, Inc.
Fresno, CA
General Atomics
(formerly Ogden
Environmental
Services)
San Diego, CA
Geokinetics
Berkeley, CA
Geokinetics
Berkeley, CA
Geokinetics & Duke
Engineering
GBXSolutions, Inc.
Concord, CA
Groundwater
Technology :
Government Services,
Inc.
Concord, CA
Hughes Environmental
Systems, Inc.
Manhattan Beach, CA
Integrated Water
Resources, Inc. :
Lockheed Martin
' Missiles & Space Co.,
Inc.
Palo Alto, CA
Technology
Reactor Filter
System
Microbial
Composting
Precipitation,
Microfiltration,
Sludge
Dewatering
Circulating Bed
Combuster
Acoustic Barrier
Separator
Electrokinetics
Closed Loop Lead
Recovery
Electrokinetic
Heating &
Surfactant
Flushing
GISVKey
Environmental
Data
Management
Software
Biological
Composting
Steam Enhanced
Recovery Process
Stripping of TCE
Electrokinetic
Remediation
Contact
Neil Widmer
714-859-8851
Douglas
Slunnecke
415-596-1020
Scott Jackson
209-291-8144
Robert Goforth
619^55-2499
Anthony
Gattuso
619-455-2910
Steven Clark
510-704-2940
Steven Clark
510-704-2940
Steven Clark
510-704-2940
Garry Reid
510-827-5400
Ronald Hicks
510-671-2387
Paul De Percin
U.S. EPA
513-569-7797
805-565-0996
Steven H.
Schwartzkopf
415^24-3176
Program
imerging
Technology
Emerging
Technology
Demonstration
Demonstration
Demonstration
Emerging
Technology
Demonstration
Demonstration
Demonstration
Demonstration
Emerging
Technology
Demonstration
Demonstration
Demonstration
Status
Completed
1995
Completed
1999
Ongoing
Completed
1993
Completed
1989
Completed
1995
Completed
2000
Ongoing
Completed
1999
Completed
1993
Completed
1995
Completed
1993
Ongoing
Ongoing
A-3
-------
SITE PROJECTS - BY DEVELOPER STATE (continued)
State
California
(continued)
Developer
Magnum Water
Technology
El Segundo, CA
Membrane
Technology and
Research, Inc.
Menlo Park, CA
North American
Technologies Aprotek
San Ramon, CA
NOVATERRA, Inc.
(formerly Toxic
Treatments USA, Inc.)
Los Angeles, CA
Praxis Environmental
Services
Burlingame, CA
Pulse Sciences,
San Leandro, CA
Radian Corporation
(formerly AWD
Technologies, Inc.)
Walnut Creek, CA
Regenesis
Retech, Inc.
Ukiah, CA
Rochem Separation
Systems, Lie.
Torrance, CA
Roy F. Weston
Sherman Oaks, CA
Simulprobe
Technologies, Lie.
Technology
CAV-OX Process
VaporSep
Membrane
Process
Oleofilter
Li-situ and Air
Stripping
Li-situ Steam
Enhanced
Extraction
X-Ray Treatment
(Aqueous)
X-Ray Treatment
(Soils)
Integrated Vapor
Extraction and
Steam Vacuum
Stripping
Biological
Treatment, HRC
of Organics
Plasma Arc
Vitrification
Rochem Disc
Tube Module
System
Li well Air
Stripping
Core Barrel Soil
Sampler
Contact
Dale Cox
310-322-4143
Jack Simser
310-640-7000
Marc Jacobs
Doug
Gottschlich
415-328-2228
Cathryn
Wimberly
916-366-6185
Philip LaMori
310-328-9433
Lloyd Stewart
415-641-9044
Vernon Bailey
510-632-5100
ext. 227
Vernon Bailey
510-632-5100
ext. 227
David
Bluestein
415-227-0822
Dr. Stephen
Koeningberg
949-366-8000
Ronald
Womack
LeroyB.
Leland707-
462-6522
David
LaMonica
310-370-3160
JeffBannon
818-971-4900
Eric Klingel
704-660-1673
Richard Laton
415-883-8787
Program
Demonstration
Emerging
Technology
Demonstration
Demonstration
Demonstration
Emerging
Technology
Emerging
Technology
Demonstration
Demonstration
Demonstration
Demonstration
.Demonstration
Monitoring and
Measurement
Technologies
Status
Completed
1993
Completed
1991
Completed
Completed
1989
Completed
1997
Completed
1994
Ongoing
Completed
1990
Ongoing
Completed
1991
Completed
1994
Completed
1994
Completed
A-4
-------
SITE PROJECTS - BY DEVELOPER STATE (continued)
State
California
[continued)
Cbjorado
sv s
Developer
SIVE Services
Dison, CA
SRI Instruments
Torrance, CA
Terra-Kleen Response
Group, Inc.
Del Mar, CA
Texaco, Inc.
S. El Monte, CA ,
Thermatrix, Lie.
(Formerly Purus, Lie.)
San Jose, CA
U.S. EPA Region IX
San Francisco, CA
U.S. Filter
(formerly Ultrox)
Santa Ana, CA
Xon Tech, Inc.
Van Nuys, CA
X-19 Biological
Products, Lie.
CF Systems <'-' "- "- -
€
i&tvada, OO
••*•,'
Colorado £%>t- af
HeaCth
iUfeft.v0r,iCO
^ .• s
; CoJosrado Schootojf , -
Maes, 0ol-dei)L, CO'
• and Cdlorado ^ J " -
: DeparttHerjtpJffefealtk
Heaver* CO
Gefleral I&vkdixfnBHtal
ttefHWisteatkin^
JJtenionsliklscqi
t>ejn6ijslra|i.cift
i Bg*etjg|b£ ,
; tfechndQgf -
Dem0HS:tEati<;in
Status
Ongoing
Completed
1992
Completed
1994
Completed
1997
Completed
1994
Completed
1992
Completed
,1990
Completed
1989
Completed
1991
Ongoing
£<3tmpJ&te4, ;
«&a£ ^ ^
: Qpgdtfig :
; Completed :
;1999 '
c-oaipteted - "
Completed
l$9$"
A-5
-------
SITE PROJECTS - BY DEVELOPER STATE (continued)
State
Developer
Technology
Contact
Program
Status
Colorado
(contiaued;)
rK Gfo- " "
Carets
Victear
Cdlofadri
lefty Tenjf ^atefre
Connecticut
Dexsil Corporation
Hamden, CT
4 demonstrations
Environmental
Test Kits (PCB)
Chlor-N-Soil
L2000
PCB/Chloride
Analyzer
Jack Mahon
203-288-3509
Monitoring and
Measurement
Technologies .
Completed
1993
, and
Microfiltratioa
21^774-22.77
199,0
Florida
Strategic Diagnostics
Inc. (formerly Ensys,
Lie.)
Newark, DE :
Ihimunoassay for
PCP
TimLawruk
800-544-8881
302-456-6782
Monitoring and
Measurement
Technologies
Completed
1993
A-6 '
-------
SITE PROJECTS - BY DEVELOPER STATE (continued)
State
'lorida
(continued)
G3'ojg$a' ,",.,/„"
„,„,„..„, ^'_
- -
f f f > f
Idaho
Developer
Funderburk and
Associates
ApoUo Beach, PL
High Voltage
Environmental
Applications,
Ihc./Florida
International
University and
University of Miami
Miami, PL
High Voltage
Environmental
Applications, Inc.
Miami, PL
PCP, Inc.
West Palm Beach, PL
r&BSJ&JBft eoiabHStifes./
:&&• ", ,.„, %
Norcc«s^'-*>»
NoKacosst, a»g&m ( ' \ri
jy^d, -
^&iki1aft»fetar ' ••
v ?
Fr/fefpescjc ' "
giaj^e-Fd'fe&''
Coinbustbn
S^terfl ' '
SoSl'^y^, s
f f f f > f f
f /
,_ \
Sediment Core
Sampler
Russian Peat
Borer
Phytoremediation
of Radionuclides
Contact
Ray
Funderburk
800-723-8847
William
Cooper
910-962-3450
William
Cooper
305-593-5330
Martin Cohen
407-683-0507
Iqregpty
Gttstm "
4Q4.S^Mim ^~
Oana^i ' % "2
^4.243^7? -
BkaZifte "
4f)4^j54-303S;
S.Ja^sstt"
" Hubraard
(P^- lfeA>
.513^5927507
/ < f •• ••
-, ^ "- > ' '
Will Young
208-768-2222
Will Young
208-768-2222
Scott Lee
208-533-7829
Program
Demonstration
Emerging
Technology
Demonstration
Emerging
Technology
Monitoring and
Measurement
Technologies.
tteiKpij§i?aliatt
."Mbi4iD!ffl(g w&
i M&asatrftftte'at ; , _
Tfto|tiiol«^ ' '
I D^t»oHS(jak«ft
;^% ' f -.-.'. /
i'lsisgiag
; fedharilo^
_/ J V
Monitoring and
Measurement
Monitoring and
Measurement
Technologies
Demonstration
Status
Completed
1997
Completed
1993
Completed
1994
Completed
Completed
1991
I C-QBip1ete4 , I
I W»",
Ceinpjeted
i!992
i-CompJefed-- -
I ises-
;ExJ^1^2. :
s s ^ -.-. <-•.< -.-•
Completed
Completed
Ongoing
A-7
-------
SITE PROJECTS - BY DEVELOPER STATE (continued)
State
Idaho
(continued)
Mnpjg
Developer
Art's Manufacturing
and Supply
J.R. Simplot Co.
Pocatello, ID
Morrison Knudsen
Corp./STG
Technologies
Boise, ID
Process Technologies,
Lie.
Boise, ID
U.S. DOB/ Duke
Engineering
Lockheed, ED
AEiediSigfia^
€ot$K>ra$iofl \ "
Etes.?iaittfttE,
-------
SITE PROJECTS - BY DEVELOPER STATE (continued)
State
ttUaoJg
"(eoniiniifei)
, •, s ••
-
Indiana
|bwa -
Kansas
•. s s
Kfeatwfcy
Louisiana
Developer
R^fey^iftgiSebjiCfeS,.
lac,.
Chicago, IL. % '
W&eelafefatorCfewx -
Mr Systems (formerly
demfcaJI Waste
J^sua^io«a4)
8t&$ca!Mx&.*& "", "
Bio-Rem, Lie.
Butler, IN
Geoprobe
Salina, KS
Sevenson
Environmental
Services, Inc.
Munster, IN
Sevenson
Environmental
Services, Lie.
Munster, IN
Soil Tech, ATP
Systems Lie
Porter, IN
^eBjettfs: Associ^s., ;
. &<£.
Geoprobe Systems
Salina, KS
Mfjtoseflso* System,
• ik^ -- .. - -
BoWliag Oreeri, KT
Advanced Remediation
Mixing, Lie. (Formerly
Chemfix Technologies,
Inc.)
Kenner, LA
Electrokinetics, Inc.
Baton Rouge, LA
Technology
Besofpiisft m&
VaprlxteaCtfon
System
,lBvagta'afioa--an.d
•Ch^tlgieai
Oxid^ioa
* > ••
Augmented Ih-situ
Subsurface
Bioremediation
Process
Soil, Water,
Vapor
Sampling Cone
Penetrometer
Chemical
Stabilization of
Mercury Mining
Wastes
MAECTTIE®
Treatment Process
Thermal
Desorption
^JMC „ , s"
BjwJpSttO^taBst's
SHissotftob*
Large Bore Soil
Sampler
Foftebj|*t3$s;;,/
Chtottsat&gr^sh
Solidification and
Stabilization
Electrokinetic
Remediation
Contact
William.
Me&uan
312^63^26^
•Bob teftijttfet-
7C&m^OCL,
-
David Mann
219-868-5823
800-428-4626
Wes McCall
TomOmli
800-436-7762
Steve Chisick
219-836-0116
Chuck
McPheeters
219-836-.0116
Joe Hutton
219-926-8651
3fhp Clements
5i5-m-S285'
Wesley
McCall
Tom Omli
800-436-7762
Jfetma^Davls ,
5tSM^i353 -
Sam Pizzitola
504-461-0466
Elif Acar
504-388-3992
Program
DeBKfft&ffa$5a% ;
IkanattstESiidai
"• "•
Demonstration
Monitoring and
Measuring
Technologies
Demonstration
Demonstration
Demonstration
| Mpjpitajng iaijd
; M^^m^tK&M
: "Eeefeiofeigies
Monitoring and
Measurements
Technologies
,Mo«8^«g and.
MessttPsmett.t
: •.¥ echnril6^i6s
Demonstration
Emerging
Technology
Demonstration
Status
<$ttgot&g: , ,\
Cootf>fefed ;
, , , /,
Completed
1993
Completed
1995
Ongoing
Completed
2000
Completed
1992
CompIelBd
Completed
: CotBpteted
1995 ^ -'
Completed
1989
Completed
1989
Ongoing
A-9
-------
SITE PROJECTS - BY DEVELOPER STATE (continued)
State
Louisiana
(continued)
Maryland
Massachusetts
Developer
Electrokinetics, Inc.
Baton Rouge, LA
SBP Technologies, Lie.
Baton Rouge, LA
QJK ia<^ljSe*viees,. Jae,
;iT-< : * ,
W. E, {Sere anii ,
Ai$tti&t4$, too. ,
ABB Environmental
Services, Inc.
Wakefield, MA
Harding Lawson
Associates (formally
ABB Environmental
Services, Inc.)
Wakefieia,MA
Harding-Lawson
Engineers
Wakefield, MA
Bruker Instruments
BiUerica, MA
HNU Systems, Inc. :
Newtown, MA
HNU Systems, Lie.
Newtown, MA
KSE, Inc.
Amherst, MA
Maxymillian
Technologies, Lie.
(formerly Glean
Berkshires)
Lanesboro, MA
Millipore Corporation
Bedford, 'MA
Technology
Electro-Klean
Electrokinetic Soil
Remediation -
Membrane
Separation and
Bioremediation
Brnfitax^SoSip^s
Sarv«y System
^6-$tt«b1fca®
^aSsl^&ScdKM
Satjiplejr '
Anaerobic/
Aerobic
Sequential
Bioremediation
Two-Zone Plume
Interception Li-
situ Treatment
Strategy
Li-situ Anerobic-
aerotic
Bioremediation
Bruker Mobile
Environmental
Monitor
Portable Gas
Chromatograph
Portable X-Ray
Fluorescence
Spectrometer
AirE
Photocatalytic
Technology for
Air Streams
High Temperature
Thermal Process
EnviroGardPCB
Lnmunoassay Test
Kit
Lnmunoassay for
POP (Soil, Water)
Contact
Elif Acar
504-753-8004
Clayton Page
504-755-7711
BORS? Tacfc® >
iattlHeiHung;
3mr$ff:$i0^
s&r ' " ..'
Ffensterin^fchef
41
-------
SITE PROJECTS - BY DEVELOPER STATE (continued)
State
Developer
Technology
Contact
Program
Status
Massachusetts
continued)
Niton Corporation
Bedford, MA
Portable X-Ray
Fluorescence
Spectrometer
Don Sackett
781-275-9275
Monitoring and
Measurement
Technologies
ompleted
1995
Ohmicron Corporation
Newton, MA
Immunoassay for
PCP in SoU
Mary Hayes
215-860-5115
Monitoring and
Measurement
Technologies
Completed
1993
PSI Technology Co.
Andover, MA
Immobilize and
Decontaminate
Metals in
Aggregate Solids
Joseph
Morency
508-689-0003
Emerging
Technology
Completed
1993
UV Technologies, Inc.
(formerly Energy and
Environmental
Engineering, Inc.)
East Cambridge, MA
Laser-Induced
Photochemical
Oxidative
Destruction
John Roll
James Porter
617-666-5500
Emerging
Technology
Completed
1993
Mfemssofa
tm-
Cfetl-cote-,
M&gfenme Cotpcsradoa
Missouri
COGNK TERRAMET
Gross, MO
Removal of Lead
from Soils
Lou Magdits
573-626-3476
Demonstration
Completed
1994
Moateaa"
Nebraska
University of Nebraska
•Lincoln, NE
Spray Irrigation
Ray Spalding
402-483-3931
Demonstration
Completed
1996
US* EPA,,.. ,
La* Vegas, fcf
•Staining
ffiktsh.
7Q2.-W-a.373
A-ll
-------
SITE PROJECTS - BY DEVELOPER STATE (continued)
State
New Jersey
Developer
Accutech Lie
Keyport, NJ and
New Jersey Institute of
Technology
Newark, NJ
ART International, Inc.
(formerly Bnviro
Sciences, Inc.)
Denville, NJ
Dehydro-Tech.
Corporation
Somerville, NJ
Geotech Development
Corporation
Newark, NJ
Envirogen, Inc.
Lawrenceville, NT :
M.L. ENERGIA, Lie.
Princeton, NJ
M.L. ENERGIA, Lie.
Princeton, NJ
New Jersey Institute of
Technology, Hazardous
Substance Management
Research Center
Newark, NJ
New Jersey Institute of
Technology
Newark, NJ and
GeoTech Development
Corporation
King of Prussia, PA
New Jersey Institute of
Technology
•Newark, NJ
Phytotech, Lie.
Monmouth, NJ
Technology
Pneumatic
Fracturing
Extraction and
Hot Gas Injection
Low-Energy
Solvent Extraction
Process
Carver-Greenfield
Process for
Extraction of Oily
Waste
Cold Top
Vitrification
Microbial
Degradation/
Solvent Extraction
Reductive Photo-
Dechlorination
Treatment
Reductive
Photo-Thermal
Oxidation
Processes for
Chlorocarbons
Pneumatic
Fracturing/
Bioremediation
Cold Top
Vitrification
GHEA Associates
Process
Phytoextraction of
metal from soil
Contact
John Liskowitz
908-739-6444
Werner
Steiner
201-627-7601
Theodore
Trowbridge
908-904-1606
William
Librizzi
201-596-5846
Thomas Tate
610-337-8515
Ronald
Unterman
(609) 936-
9300
Moshe Lavid
609-799-7970
Moshe Lavid
609-799-7970
John Schuring
201-596-5849
David Kosson
908-445-4346
William
Librizzi
201-596-5846
Thomas Tate
610-337-8515
Itzhak Gottlieb
201-226-4642
Burt Ensley
908-438-0900
Program
Demonstration
Emerging
Technology
Demonstration
Demonstration
Demonstration
Emerging
Technology
Emerging
Technology
Emerging
Technology
Demonstration
Emerging
Technology
Demonstration
Status
Completed
1992
Completed
1994
Completed
1991
Ongoing
Completed
2000
Completed
1995
Ongoing
Completed
1992
Ongoing
Completed
1992
Completed
1998
A-12
-------
SITE PROJECTS - BY DEVELOPER STATE (continued)
State
•Jew Jersey
(continued)
3Stew Mgs&o
New York
Developer
Sentex Sensing
Technology, Inc.
Ridgefield, NJ
Solucorp
Saddle Back, NJ
Baiftgswaa ,
AmK&afe$7&ftr
AlbBqu&rtjiM^'NM ,
f V..V > •• •- •• ••
CtoraintxiQre Advdaced
S^encaSj'Ihe,
^Titjijer^eJSM
IfesoiM'oei.J^&aagifeJueoi:
and Jtecoveiy ^foimerly,
: Bi) > '„
'fee* <2rH6asrHM
; Sawfta^atiojal ' ' ^
•tsfe^atoffes - -
'-. AJba
-------
SITE PROJECTS - BY DEVELOPER STATE (continued)
State
Developer
Technology
Contact
Program
Status
New York
(continued)
Texaco Syngas, Inc.
White Plains, NY
Gasification
Process
John Winter
316-251-4000
ext. 536
Demonstration
Completed
1994
Xerox Corporation
Webster, NY
Ground Water
Extraction
Ron Hess
716^22-3694
PhilMook
916-643-5443
Demonstration
Completed
1995
Ohio
CotepMed
,
Cekftabss, OS"
614424-4811
, ,
Vife^leatlcai '
Coatpfefed"
•CShelatW
Bnaeifguig
&&&$
-------
SITE PROJECTS - BY DEVELOPER STATE (continued)
State
Developer
Technology
Contact
Program
Status
McCwfley
Huffman ,
WilSam £&<&.-
Oklahoma
Geo-Microbial
Technologies,
Ochelata, OK
Technology for
Metals Release
and Removal from
Wastes
Donald
Hitzman
918-535-2281
Emerging
Technology
Ongoing
Bentf.O'E
Pennsylvania
Aluminum Company of
America (formerly
Alcoa Separations
Technology, Inc.)
Pittsburgh, PA
Bioscrubber
Paul liu
412-826-3711
Emerging
Technology
Completed
1993
Calgon Carbon
Oxidation
Technologies (formerly
Peroxidation Systems,
Inc.)
Pittsburgh, PA
Perox-Pur
Chemical
Oxidation
Bertrand
Dussert
412-787-6681
Demonstration
Completed
1995
Center for Hazardous
Materials Research
Pittsburgh, PA
Acid Extraction
Treatment System
Stephe Paff
412-826-5321
Emerging
Technology
Completed
1992
Center for Hazardous
Materials Research
Pittsburgh, PA ,
Organics
Destruction and
Metals
Stabilization
B Stephe Paff
412-826-5321
Brian
Bosilovich
412-826-5321
Emerging
Technology
Completed
1995
A-15
-------
SITE PROJECTS - BY DEVELOPER STATE (continued)
State
Pennsylvania
(continued)
Developer
Concurrent
Technologies (formerly
Center for Hazardous
Materials Research)
Pittsburgh, PA
MacTec-SPB
Technologies Company
Pittsburgh, PA
Geo-Con, Lie.
Monroeville, PA
2 Demonstrations
Horsehead Resource
Development Co. Lie.
Monaca, PA
Lewis Environmental
Services, Lie.
Pittsburgh, PA
Strategic Diagnostics,
Lie.
Newtown, PA
Remediation
Technologies, Lie.
Pitsburgh.PA '
R.E. Wright
Middletown, PA
Roy F. Western, Lie.
West Chester, PA
RoyF. W.eston.Lic.
West Chester, PA
Vortec Corp
Collegeville, PA
Technology
Lead Smelting
Li Well Vapor
Stripping of
Ground Water
Li-situ
Solidification/
Stabilization
Flame Reactor
Soil Leaching
Process
Lnmunoassay for
PCP
Slurry
Biodegradation
Bioventing, Air
Sparging,
Biological
Treatment for
Ground Water
(multi-developer
project with state
of New York)
Thermal
Desorption
Steam
Regeneration
Adsorption
System
(Ambersorb)
Oxidation and
Vitrification
Process
Contact
Brian
Bosilovich
412-826-5321
Mark
McGlathery
800-444-6221
Linda Ward
Robert Hayden
412-856-7700
Regis Zagrocki
610-826-8810
Tom Lewis IE
412-322-8100
Craig
Kostyshyn
215-860-5115
ext. 634
David Nakles
412-826-3340
Richard
Cronce
717-944-5501
Mike Cosmos
215^30-7423
John
Thoroughgood
610-701-3728
Deborah
Plantz
215-537-4061
James Hnat
610-489-2255
Program
Emerging
Technology
Demonstration
Demonstration
Demonstration
Emerging
Technology
Monitoring and
Measurement
Technologies
Demonstration
Demonstration
Demonstration
Emerging
Technology
Emerging'
Technology
Demonstration
Status
Completed
1993
Completed
1999
Completed
1988
Completed
Ongoing
Completed
1993
Completed
1991
Completed
1992
Completed
1992
Completed
1995
Completed
1993
Ongoing
A-16
-------
SITE PROJECTS - BY DEVELOPER STATE (continued)
State
South CaroBaa
'
Tennessee
Texas -
« s, ;
- ' - -
Developer
B&€WinJsm&
SujnmervSfe, SC '
t?nfrets%£f-S«rti( - "
C^rofina ,„ , , ,.. '
Ck&BaM^SC
Bergmann USA
GaUatin, TN
Brown and Root
Environmental/
Illinois Institute of
Technology
Oak Ridge, TN
IT Corporation
Knoxville, TN
-
WASTECH, Lie.
Oak Ridge, TN
tfedfldaelksi aadDute-
^gfajeejiag
I"' V f ,
EEIVlii&
•Bellaix0T XX, ,, ' -
iB^JKCfcftsia|t£»g
: Eftgkeejiag fcnd.
Lar$6a BngiwseriBg
Houston, TX'
Technology
Ctetti&al
Stabflfeatiftiiioi
J/t«fcpry5^;niHg -
Ws?fes -
in^toMiligattDH '
oM^Wiat^ "
f ••>/••
Soil and Sediment
Washing
Technology
Radio Frequency
Heating
Batch Steam
Distillation and
Metal Extraction
Eimco Biolift
Slurry Reactor as
developed by
Tekno Associates
Mixed Waste
Treatment Process
Photocalytic and
Biological Soil
Detoxificaiton
Solidification/
Stabilization
MefeB£Mfl.£ti0'-
Etos^.'&
S»rl»&laat
JP&$h% -
-VoB^tais - ^
atfeajtoiftcso
JtebHS StfrfaaBS
Bjaveating,A&-
Spatgiagi
Bidngieat
Tns^jTfefif fipr , %
<3fefflj»eE Water
(aiaJti-4«?&loi3W '
pibjectwitfetthe
St^es-of Jfcw
Ttote
Contact
CftatUfe -
WMaraB$43-.
S2tH20»
&snfc
GatwfdQ
803-?7?-45ia
George Jones
615-230-2217
Clifton
Blanchard
423-483-9900
Stuart Shealy
423-690-3211
Kandi Brown
423-690-3211
Ed Alperin
615-690-3211
Duane Graves
423-690-3211
Terrence •'
Lyons
U.S. EPA
513-569-7859
Harry
lannemeyer - ••
51^425-2000"
Stevea Cferfc
510-704-1640
Itua TaotBioH
71^56^0727
PMd
EAiasdfea
CQN^O - ,
713-520-6862.
S> SsM*
yateaaiar
7lg-272.-K?3l0
Program
Dftiaoogtt&tioa
f f f
Kotftrging
teeta<$agy
Demonstration
Demonstration
Emerging
Technology
Emerging
Technology
Emerging
Technology
Emerging
Technology
Demonstration
BeihDtistratto
: f> ••
De«jOBStfa4o»;
,DefltCtf)Stt:&fio«
Status
Oagoiftg:
Completed
im ' ,
Completed
1992
Completed
1994
Completed
1992
Completed
1992
Completed
1995
Completed
1993
Completed
1991
Cdmpl&teS.
im , :
\ CoiHpJeted ,
• 1997 ' - '
Combed
.19$$' '
A-17
-------
SITE PROJECTS - BY DEVELOPER STATE (continued)
State
Developer
Technology
Contact
Program
Status
,, "lit
i TK' : ^
S13-S474232
214-522^741^
Co-tapped
713-49^321 '-
1994
Utah
'Phytokinetics, Inc.
North Logan, UT
Phytoremedia-tion
of Soils
Ari Ferro
801-750-0985
Emerging
Technology
Demonstration
Completed
1999
Completed
1999
Vermont
2000
Virginia
BioGenesis
Enterprises, Lie.
Fairfax Station, VA
Soil Washing/
Biological
Treatment
Charles Wilde
703-250-3442
Demonstration
Completed
1992
A-18
-------
SITE PROJECTS - BY DEVELOPER STATE (continued)
State
Developer
Technology
Contact
Program
Status
Virginia
(continued)
BWX Tech., Lie.
(Affiliate of Bafacock
andWilcoxCo.
Lynchburg, VA
Cyclone Furnace
ivan Reynolds
804-522-6000
imerging
Technology
Demonstration
Completed
1992
ompleted
1991
Dynaphore, Inc.
Richmond, VA
Removal of
Dissolved Heavy
Metals via
FORAGER
Sponge
Sforinan
Rainer
804-288-7109
Demonstration
Completed
1994
OT1 Industries
Roanoke, VA
Enhanced In-Situ
Bioremediation of
Chlorinated
Compounds
Rosann
Kryczkowski
540-362-7356
Demonstration
Completed
1999
|J!o§Ji3?iy
Cteosafe C
RicKlasd,
1094
509-37.5^710
Cforppjefced
1992
Ajjsy Anderson.
&m$ Steeo
.Bk>gfe» Reactor
1995'
Seattle, WA
Biologies!, , '
1995
Saatfle.W^ '
Wisconsin
Minergy
Thermal Sediment
Reuse Technology
Terry Carroll
920-727-1411
Demonstration
Ongoing
A-19
-------
SITE PROJECTS - BY DEVELOPER STATE (continued)
State
Wisconsin
(continued)
Wyoming
Canada
Developer
Svedala Industries
(formerly Allis Mineral
Systems)
Oak Creek, WI
US EPA/ NRMRL US-
DA Forest Products
Lab
Madison
University of
Wisconsin,
Madison, WI
Wesley Ibsfeipii
InsfiJiut*? ^
LMfjaie^ W? *
*•> "" *" *" -.
•.
Atomic Energy of
Canada, Limited Chalk
River, Ontario
Atomic Energy of
Canada, Limited Chalk
River, Ontario
Cone Tech
Investigations
Vancouver, British
Colombia
ELIEcologic
International, Lie.
Rockwood, Ontario
EnviroMetal
Technologies, Lie.
EnviroMetal :
Technologies, Lie.
Guelph, Ontario
2 Demonstrations
Grace Dearborn, Lie.
Mississauga, Ontario
Technology
Pyrokiln Thermal
Encapsulation
Process
Fungus Treatment
Technology
Photoelectro-
catalytic
Treatment of
Metals and
Organics in Water
Con&ittad
Recovery Of 0%
W*t* £Cm0W)
Ultrasonic-Acid
.Leachate
Treatment for
Mixed Wastes
Chemical
Treatment and
Ultrafiltration
Resistivity, pH,
Seismic,
Temperature,
Cone
Penetrometer
Thermal Gas
Phase Reduction
Process and
Thermal
Desorption
Li Situ Reactive
Barrier
Metal Enhanced
Abiotic
Degradation
Daramend Process
Contact
JimKidd
414-798-6341
Glenn Heian
414-762-1190
Richard Lamar
608-231-9469
Marc
Anderson
608-262-2674
Charles Hill,
Jr.
608-263-4593
James! Speight
3W^2l~20£l ;
Shiv Vijayan
613-583-3311
ext. 3220/6057
Leo Buckley
613-584-3311
Ward Phillips
604-327-4311
Jim Nash
519-856-9591
John Vogan
519-824-0432
William
Matulewicz
609-722-6700
Alan Seech
Paul Bucen
905-272-7480
Program
Emerging
Technology
Demonstration
Emerging
Technology
: Bmfi^ging
: Teefiflialc!|»y '
D^ftoastetti-Gn
Emerging
Technology
Emerging
Technology
Monitoring and
Measuring
Technologies
Demonstration
Demonstration
Demonstration
Ex-situ
Li-situ
Demonstration
Status
Completed
1993
Completed
1991
Completed
1 Completed.
\ im
I C««iipfete4
:i997
Completed
Completed
1993
Completed
1992
Completed
1992
Completed
2000
Completed
1995
Completed
Completed
1994
A-20
-------
SITE PROJECTS - BY DEVELOPER STATE (continued)
State
Canada
continued)
En^&ftipMted
Kingdom -
Italy
iWrto'Efe
Developer
Matrix Photocatalytic
Limited (formerly
Nutech Environmental)
London, Ontario,
Canada
Matrix Photocatalytic
Limited
Toronto Harbour
Comission
Toronto, Ontario
Wastewater
Technology Centre
Burlington, Ontario
Zenon Environmental
Systems, Inc.
Burlington, Ontario
'Zenon Environm'ental
Systems, Inc.
Burlington, Ontario
Zenon Environmental
Systems, Lie.
Burlington, Ontario
; AEAT^haology
:(&^srIyW.atttai
Spring tabcsstory)
^for^fsihJrev BngJafliS „
^dsebfltmitigj, - s
|4,lmifeil
'Wstesft>r4Ee?ts, ,
Ebgla»dL ">"
Gruppo Italimpresse
(developed by Shirco
Infrared Systems, Inc.)
(formerly ECOVA)
Rome, Italy
2 Demonstrations
Terra Vae,In.c,
^sjtJwstt^R
Technology
TiO2
Photocatalytic
Treatment of
Aqueous Waste
Streams
TiO2
Photocatalytic Air
Treatment
Soil Recycling
Cross-Flow
Pervaporation
System
Bioreactor
Integrated with an
Ultrafiltration
Membrane System
Cross-Flow
Pervaporation
System
ZenoGem Process
Pitysic&l-awJ
Chearfcai
Tsfeatment
JouMofeaity'
•Sp&KtromBlry
f J 1 '•':
Lifrared Thermal
Destruction
6}-s|taV^eipim
l3ceRM?tiioa ,
Contact
Bob
Henderson
519-660-8669
Bob
Henderson
519-660-8669
Dennis Lang
416-863-2047
Chris Lipski
905-639-6320
lisa Ashton
905-639-6320
ext. 244
Phil Canning
TonyTonelli
905-639-6320
Chris Lipski
905-639-6320
§<£¥& Barte
01i-44-J23S-
463062
•••>••'•'• •- •*
Tokt
BrofcansMrfe
01X-I4492S-
mm , ,
MsttifeCofeteft
561-683-050?
John Cioffi
206-883-1900
Jiaiajest Milot
187-72^B7SQ "
Program
Emerging
Technology
Demonstration
Demonstration
Emerging
Technology
Demonstration
Demonstration
Demonstration
'lEwsiegteg :
. 'FeefeJj.oloj^
M&as«Hag au4
MdnitoriHg
^eciaolagiess -
Demonstration
: t^monstr^iion
Status
Completed
1994
Completed
1995
Completed
1992
Completed
1992
Completed
1995
Completed
1995
Completed
1995
-Cokpfei&l'' 1 V
W94 ,_ :
OOJnpl&fed
.wb*:.
Completed
1987
CoBjpIefed.
A-21
-------
-------
Appendix B
SITE TECHNOLOGY DEMONSTRATION SITES
(Alphabetically by Demonstration Site State)
B-l
-------
TECHNOLOGY DEMONSTRATION SITES - BY SITE STATE
State
Ateskft
Arizona
Arkansas
'
California
Demonstration
Location
BaJtbaafcs., AK
JABR s\^> '
SiijperfunctSUife
$fegto1l$
"i.
Phoenix, AZ
Pesticide Site
(Region 9)
Phoenix, AZ
Pesticide Site
(Region 9)
Phoenix, AZ
Williams AFB
(Region 9)
JeffeaspiEk Aft
r IMwaatoa. Jtes&assfe.
facility (JH3P} -V :
"J ^s ' f ^
s s •*
'ff
f \f f S S
., ' ,w ^ -.
Burbank, CA
Lockheed Site
(Region 9)
Clear Lake, CA '
Technology
SoilWi&hiag
Low
Temperature
.Thermal
Aeration
Anaerobic
Thermal
Processor
Li-situ
Subsurface
Bioremediation
1JfttnablB-Pnl5&
'CofflbitS^QO
r^retan Btttfier
(1^0raia|L -
Dasteuc%a)
Integrated In-situ
Vapor Extraction
and Steam
Vacuum
Stripping Process
Biostabilization
of Mercury
Mining Wastes
Contact
Brfeo
En^ifbnmfental
Sex^ces'
CtJcpwatSoa
(BBSOORP)
FaMjiatas:s,AK
OraJlg Jones.
90?453~25iS -
Smith
Environmental
Services (formerly
Canonie)
Englewood, CO
Joe Hutton
219-926-8651
Smith
Environmental
Services (formerly
Canonie)
Englewood, CO
Joe Hutton
219-926-8651
Bio-Rem
Butler, IN
David O. Mann
219-868-5823
Snnotecb, Injc*
Atlattta,m3&
Am«w«a,
Cotab'ogtkia *
tfecBiiokigies
KopSfOsa, fiA
KSr^atyCJitmaa
40^564-41^0
Radian
Corporation
(formerly AWD
Technologies,
Inc.)
Walnut Creek, CA
David Bluestein
415-227-0822
Pintail Systems,
Lie.
Aurora, CO
Leslie Thompson
303-367-8443
Program
Pedssttsttsfioa
'
Demonstration
Demonstration
Demonstration
iDemGnstrattaa
, •>
pewojw&rsSoB. '
Demonstration
Demonstration
Status
Cofttpfeted '.
; i9jn ' ;
Completed
1992
Completed
Completed
1993
Completed
IW5
Ce»(q>fe{e4 i
m% ,
Completed
1990
Ongoing
B-2
-------
TECHNOLOGY DEMONSTRATION SITES - BY SITE STATE (continued)
State
California
continued)
Demonstration
Location
Clear Lake, C A
Clear Lake, CA
Edwards AFB, CA
(Region 9)
Fresno, CA
Selma Site
(Region 9)
Fresno, CA
Selma Site
(Region 9)
Fullerton, CA
McColl Superfund .
Site
(Region 9)
Huntington Beach,
CA
Rainbow Disposal
(Region 9)
Jackson, CA
Pintail Systems, Inc.
(Region 9)
Technology
Chemical
Stabilization of
Mercury Mining
Wastes
Chemical
Stabilization of
Mercury Mining
Wastes
CAV-OX
Oxidation •
Process
Entrained-Bed
Gasfication
Silicate
Compounds by
Solidification/
Stabilizatioin
Excavation and
Foam
Suppression of
Volatiles
Steam Injection/
Vacuum
Extraction
(SIVE)
Biological
Stabilization of
Arsenic in Soils
Contact
Sevenson, W.C.
Munster, IN
Steve Chisick
219-836-0116
E&C Williams
Summerville, SC
Charlie Williams
84-821-4200
Magnum Water
Technology
El Segundo, CA
Dale Cox
310-640-7000
Texaco, Inc.
S. El Monte, CA
John Winter
310-908-7387
STC Omega
(formerly Silicate
Technology
Corporation)
Scottsdale, AZ
Steve Pegler
602-948-7100
U.S. EPA
Region 9 '
San Francisco, CA
Jon Blevins
415-744-2400
Hughes
Environmental
Manhattan Beach,
CA
(No longer a
vendor for SIVE)
Paul De Percin
U.S. EPA
513-569-7797
Pintail Systems,
Inc.
Aurora, CO
Leslie Thompson
303-367-8443
Program
Demonstration
Demonstration
Demonstration
Demonstration
Demonstration
Demonstration
Demonstration
Demonstration
Status
Ongoing
Ongoing
Completed
1993
Completed
1994
Completed
1990
Completed
1990
Completed
1993
Completed
2000
B-3
-------
TECHNOLOGY DEMONSTRATION SITES - BY SITE STATE (continued)
State
California
(continued)
Demonstration
Location
Livermore, CA
Lawrence Livermore
National Laboratory
(LLNL)
(Region 9)
Livermore, CA
LLNL
(Region 9)
March AFB, CA
(Region 9)
Port Huerieme, CA :
Naval Facilities
Engineering Service
Center
(Region 9)
Redding, CA
Iron Mountain
Superfimd Site
Sacramento, CA
McClellan AFB
(Region 9)
Sacramento, CA
McClellan AFB
(Region 9)
San Diego, CA
Technology
Chemical
Oxidation
Perox-Pure
In-situ Enhanced
Extraction
Ihwell Air
Stripping
Solvated
Electron
Treatment of
•Chlorinated
Organics
Precipitation,
Microfiltration,
Sludge
Dewatering
Photolytic
Destruction for
•SVE Off-gases
Groundwater !
Extraction
'Circulating Bed
Cumbuster
Contact
Calgon Carbon
Oxidation
Technologies
(formerly
Peroxidation
Systems, Inc.
Pittsburgh, PA
Bertrand Dussert
412-787-6681
Berkley
Environmental
Restoration
(formerly Udell
Technologies,
Inc.)
Emeryville, CA
Kent Udell
510-653-9477
Roy Weston
Woodland Hills,
CA
Jeff Bannon
818-971-4900
Commodore
Environmental
Columbus, OH
Neil Dronby
614-297-0365
EPOC Water, Lie.
Fresno, CA
Scott Jackson
209-291-8144
Process
Technologies, Inc.
Boise, ID
Michael Swan
208-385-0900
Xerox Two Phase
Extraction
Webster, NY
Ron Hess
716-422-3694
General Atomics
(formerlt Ogden
Environmental
Services)
San Diego, CA
Robert Goforth
619-455-2499
Program
Demonstration
Demonstration
Demonstration
Demonstration
Demonstration
Demonstration
Demonstration
Demonstration
Status
Completed
1995
Completed
1993
Completed
1994
Completed
1996
Completed
1993
Exited
Completed
1995
Completed
1989
B-4
-------
TECHNOLOGY DEMONSTRATION SITES - BY SITE STATE (continued)
State
California
^continued)
Demonstration
Location
San Diego, CA
Naval Air Station
North Mand (NASNI)
(Region 9)
San Diego, CA
NASNI Site 9
(Region 9)
San Francisco, CA
Westin Hotel
(Region 9)
San Jose, CA
Lorentz Barrel and
Drum Site
(Region 9)
San Pedro, CA
Annex Terminal
(Region 9)
Santa Barbara, CA
Santa Marie Health
Care Services (UST
Site)
(Region 9)
South El Monte, C A
(Region 9)
Technology
In Well Vapor
Stripping of
Ground Water
Cross-flow
Pervaporation
System for
Removal of
VOCs from
Groundwater
GIS/KEY
Software for HW
'Site
Data
Management
Ultraviolet
Ozone Treatment
for Liquids
Ih-situ Steam/
Air Stripping
Soil Washing/
Geological
Treatment
.Gasification
Process
Contact
MACTEC
Environmental,
Inc.
Pittsburgh, PA
Mark McGlathery
800444-6221
Zenon
Environmental,
Lie.
Burlington,
Ontario, Canada
Phil Canning
905-639-6320
GIS Solutions,
Inc.
Concord, CA
Garry Reid
510-827-5400
US Filter
(formerly Ultrox
International, Inc)
Santa Ana, CA
John Lowry
412-772-1247
Novaterra, Inc.
(formerly Toxic
Treatment, Inc.)
Torrance, CA
Phil La Mori
310-328-9433
BioGenesis
Enterprises
(formerly
BioVersal USA)
Fairfax Station,
VA
Charles Wilde
703-250-3442
Mohsen Amiian
708-827-0024
Texaco Syngas,
Inc.
White Plains, NY
John Winter
316.251-4000
ext. 536
Program
Demonstration
Demonstration
Demonstration
Demonstration
Demonstration
Demonstration
Demonstration
Status
Completed
1999
Completed
1995
Completed
1993
Completed
Completed
1989
Completed
1992
Completed
1994
B-5
-------
TECHNOLOGY DEMONSTRATION SITES - BY SITE STATE (continued)
State
Demonstration
Location
Technology
Contact
Program
Status
Clear Crt&fc,€Q
ffewet,
Siaiil Sampler
<>
Ctoteado
Completed
s-, Inc,
415-8^3^787
is,
Cdmpleted,
, C0
Mdnitoriag SEd
> L, Gtm sad
S&
3st
Kay
sad
1A ,
B-6
-------
TECHNOLOGY DEMONSTRATION SITES - BY SITE STATE (continued)
State
Demonstration
Location
Technology
Contact
Program
Status
L&rge B^e iSofl -
CixnVpMed
ToaxOMf
Bsttfof"
2000
519-824^422.'
Arsenal, CO
Sjiotagical
es&f&Btitt EiRC
OfOfgSttics
§49-366-8000
iJe., CO
Bsaovsftw
Passive m&>&
Drainage
JCetteCaj-ip
Delaware
Dover, DE
(Region 3) &
Elgin, IL
(Region 5)
.Matcon Modified
Asphalt Cap
Wilder
Construction
Co., WA
W. Randall
Garrett
800-484-9404
Demonstration
Ongoing
jPfatida - '
Site
SCOVAJ '
s,Ine.
&05-S65W&.
SfabSfestkal
Ceepsnt^
C^mpfefed,
'
ClaptatPage
B-7
-------
TECHNOLOGY DEMONSTRATION SITES - BY SITE STATE (continued)
State
Demonstration
Location
Technology
Contact
Program
Status
Florida
4Sxx&M& ati, OE
Georgia
Chickamuga, GA and
Hopkinsvllle, GA
(Region 4)
Debris Washing
System
U.S. EPA
NRMRL
Cincinnati, OH
Mike Taylor
512-782-4700
Demonstration
Completed
1990
Warner Robins, GA
Robins AFB
(Region 4)
Stabilization of
Organics
WASTBCH.Lic.
Oak Ridge, TN
Benjamin Peacock
615-483-6515
Demonstration
Completed
1991
Hawaii
PCB/fcitefeJs ,
2000
SW-704-2940
Deraflrtfttiafion.
XK
Steph^fiCkrfc
Cotopfeted.
2G0D
B-8
-------
TECHNOLOGY DEMONSTRATION SITES - BY SITE STATE (continued)
State
Idaho
illinois--
, , 5 .. « , ,
* •• > f ••
; J J A s.
s ' ' .,
v ••
Indiana
Jtea
/•. ^
•.
.• > ••
•" -. V, V
' >,
> •• > .V •• '
^ _,
Demonstration
Location
Aberjona River
INBELLab
-CfmeagKj, 1L
{fiiegi»K}4>\ """,
^^»"5>& „
'!> ,-
Technology
Sediment Core
Sampler
Phytoremediation
Sydraulic'
t^acfajifag
""" ' V
M«<5scstMo^fet
AsjjtsaJi: C% -
-,•••, ^ -. > '
,,,„
Thiraai
D0SSTf*JQ'».
.Solvent
Extraction
Core ^aael Sot
S^»jplgr,\^ ,, - ,
'
DaatTatjeUaer
-S60 Satniifor
•mra&Eoyf "
(SasSarV^ --
System " s ,
Contact
Aquatic Research
ID
Will Young
(208) 768-2222
Argonne National
Laboratory
West Idaho Fall,
ID
Scott Lee
(208) 533-7829
•y^EPA/ ' - --
J^R&JRL s «.
^^wM,oji
WiSiMt Slsefc
-5t34seMS84& -
Witaw
CoBStt«0ti
CA " / ' ,
JtectssrdtjalDil
41$-8i&B7$7
Asf* .
Manafactacing
aniSa^pIy^
AaaWfoaft F«Us* "
U> - "" - '
Bn^nAnilesrsaa
80^635^7330
QBaaiilSStyie&s,
fac, "•'- '
%n>
Bt9e6-Ta«ter'
'Mtttfefeafttag
3M^SW«510
Program
Monitoring and
Measurements
Demonstration
JJeraatt^atlon.
^ '•* **"•
"a0mo^teattda *->
iff •>••'*• •>
** ^ *" ** *
* ,, , ^
P^mQfls&atfpn
Demonstration
Mc^iitoiih^: arid
Miasu^raefli
• ^ '•*•'• '•v> ^ A
_.
j^jrtt^stt<^twi^,
Measur-ament ••*
Msriltertft^^
Mea^tament ""
Status
Completed
Ongoing
p^f|»fod".
;• JSWfc ;
i O^Clttg:' ' "
•••• ^ ^ > >
f •,•,-,•,
-. Completed ""
\19$2- - -
Completed
1992
Completed i
; C&mpteted- '
CompJeted-
B-9
-------
TECHNOLOGY DEMONSTRATION SITES - BY SITE STATE (continued)
State
3bWa{eon.tinEttiid.}
^ s
Kansas
Kentucky '- ,
Louisiana
Demonstration
Location
UiBerte&&i& *','-'
$?e|i> ,"
i * .'-'*"' ^ > "-•<
lAlbetia^IA,: t
i IR&gMbrJ ?£ <
f^fc^cE^JA
^
Fort Polk, LA
(Region 6)
.Lake Charles, LA
Technology
(jOrStScBibljer
Pi^sJve'SfljlCjBs
Saajpl«r '
IMC
EhvifomncHfeilist's
Suijsqalft^
|jarg« Bdt^ Soil ' "
SSt»|>lgf ;
Biological
Denitrification
''Si^sitii
ii.«cteoosmosi?
ofTCEjaSx>a/ ^
6to(j»(Jwatets -
"LasagnA"
JPepcfess
Qxfelatioft. aad
Vitrification. '
^fSTOWKSS:
>
s
Electrokinetic
Extraction
Evaporation and
Chemical
Oxidation
Contact
W.JLdbas'and^
Asstxaai&s, Inc.
BHctoa,Ml?
Kay
^enslennacfe*
41(3-^7600
Cfouifettte
.Associates, 3fnc.
IA
JitaCfe^tteiats
515^^-8285 ,
CSepipirate Systems s
8«Stt^K-S
^W«a^flvte(M
TTbtaGtali
SCKM^SJ?^
Eco Mat, Inc.
Hayward, CA
KimHalley
510-783-5885
Moasank^DtteOnt
QH
Tkorous
Hc^feworiJi
S-13-S69-7g?5
Yorfeft
eorattoR
•$t$teg&tftt&'f PA
Jaia0s Haat
610-4a9~2255
Electrokinetics,
Inc.
Baton Rouge, LA
Elif Acar
504-388-3992
Wheelbrator
Clean Air Systems
(formerly
Chemical Waste
Management)
Schaumburg, IL
Bob Hernquist
708-706-6900
Program
MttiJiLtaringafld.
Meas^^itueBf
MOftiiotiflgdttd''
Measurement
MMfiteiJlg and
Meagttif^tiant
Demonstration
Demonstration
D&ftOjis&afiQR
Demonstration
Demonstration
Status
^Drhplefed :
eowpfeted
: Ctjitspfeted
> :
Completed
2000
''• Ciftejpfoted;
\ 1^8 •
Oag^ifig.
Ongoing
Completed
B-10
-------
TECHNOLOGY DEMONSTRATION SITES - BY SITE STATE (continued)
State
Demonstration
Location
Technology
Contact
Program
Status
Massachusetts
Boston, MA
AM3
1}
Art's
Maijijfaetoring'
Measurement
Completed
Jtf ,
Brian Anderson
CempJeted
lames' Maid!;
303420-1550
OF -Systems
Osrporatioa
Am<&, CO
EJeajpa'stratJatj
•. linviremmfeatal
JLomrjatda, EL,..
'$03-846-2415
Michigan
Adrian, MI
Anderson
Development
(Region 5)
Thermal
Desorption
(physical)
Roy F. Weston,
Inc.
West Chester, PA
Michael Cosmos
215-430-7423
Demonstration
Completed
1992
Bay City, MI
Bay City Municipal
Landfill
(Region 5)
Thermal Gas
Phase Reduction
Process and
Thermal
Desorption
ELI Eco Logic
International, Inc.
Rockwood,
Ontario,
Canada
Jim Nash
519-856-9591
Demonstration
Completed
1992
B-ll
-------
TECHNOLOGY DEMONSTRATION SITES - BY SITE STATE (continued)
State
Michigan
(continued)
Minnesota - \.
11 s ^ *
v s "Vi
^ '
-•.*,
Demonstration
Location
Buchanan, ME
Electro-Voice
(Region 5)
Detroit, MI
(Region 5)
Essexville, MI
Saginaw Bay
Confined Disposal
Facility
(Region 5)
Grand Ledge, MI
Parsons Chemical Site
(Region 5)
Rose Township, MI
.(RegionS)
St. Joseph, MI
; ' " ' >X-« ' ' " " •. •> •. s
^Mksias&P^s1 s
! Superifeftd Site
JffewBfjIdgfe.MM
;$egian5>; \ '-
JWcb&ffiB&<&bfas
^HpeUtwj^Site ..
Sfe?«Bti5$?,MN-'
9&P$5} s- s ;
{ii^qOimV&^b -,
Sttp«sfi«td,-Stte "
NftwBrfdg^Mf?
-------
TECHNOLOGY DEMONSTRATION SITES - BY SITE STATE (continued)
State
Minnesota
s
' ,
-
••
Mississippi
Moato*
.• f -,-. •, •.
'
,_
-
Demonstration
Location
MinnfeSpdiJis, MK
Pj-iyate Oil Reining
(JtegtoaS)
, , ,
New Brighton, MN
Twin Cities Anay
ABp&riiiHoa Plant
- -
(Jftegjbn5^
; ' ••
Brookhaven, MS
Brookhaven Wood
Preserving
(Region 4)
Bu.ite-Siiv«rbow;Siie
ptegjiprj S)
'Butfe, MT
;
HMSfcBHoise'Mine,
MT
;(Reg^8)
:
Technology
Biological ,
•.
-
Removal of Lead ,
frorn Sogs
1
"
•* ••
Fungus
Treatment
Technology
"~"
CHejnfcal
Waste
"
Contact
Bio(3enfesis
Hiitcjrpj'J^fis.jj Intp*
f fcscfli^lv s
Charles Wl&fe
763-2SO-3442
Mbteen AroiEsn
&;;
-
CjBdariatl., OH
513-569-7444
U.S.
EPA/NRMRL
USDA-Forest
Products Lab
Madison, WI
Richard Lamar
608-231-9469
fc.C. Sschedbaek
707-4-^-6521 ', ,
SC " ' ' ' ^
843-821-4100 and:
Stem. WA
eSS?1*"
Jvathryri Lesvittn s
208^6-6115
Program
Dtt**,**
,
' -
"Demdiistotiqa,
, „
Demonstration
-
°ra^
-
&— ^ ^
Status
Coittplftted
1992
- - •
Completed
1994
ias? i
Completed
1991
: 'C*'0tfi.pl6t'&1|3-
•i ^tyi % s %
Ongoing
-
•S^-
B-13
-------
TECHNOLOGY DEMONSTRATION SITES - BY SITE STATE (continued)
State
Moatana
(continued)
Nebraska
Nevada
New Hampshire
New Jersey
'
Demonstration
Location
•Stf Louis, MT
{Reg'toa 7)
Hastings, NE
(Region 7)
{Regiott 9}
Milford, NH
Savage Superfund
Site
(Region 1)
Plaistow,NH
(Region 1)
iBfcw*Kr , ,
(Region 2>"
• H S s
! (Region Z} - '
:'
"'
s{£S%site l %
Technology
1KF fatSoS
Spray Irrigation
jB^od&grada't'inn
01 Cy^H^Qe-
Surfactant
Enanced Aquifer
Remediation
Biodegradation
ofPCB'sinSoils
Soiveat
CkrVer-
i--
RaetuiiBg,
*********
^
jin, U ItrBcnltEsiti'On
!VI'6iI2li3rni]E££ "*
System
Contact
Ctjmpany
University of
Nebraska-
Lincoln Hasting,
NE
RaySpalding
402-783-3931
Jflffi:
Ataxsa, CO
033T<3fl OslO-W^-tl
303-367-8443
U.S. DOE. Duke
Engineering
G. Michael Shook
208-526-6945
Green Mountain
Laboratories
Montpelier, VT
Adam Longee
802-223-1468
£W»*oT«>h
iTieodore
908-904-1606 ^
InSdtate of
Technology,.
Newark* NJ
S08-739-6444
lac.
Burlington,
Qatario, Canada
essf. 2.44 " ,
Program
»^mon&toiim
Demonstration
peHjonsfiratm
Demonstration
Demonstration
Pmofl^oa
.,
s
Dm"-«
'
-
'
Status
Ctanpteted
Completed
1996
Completed
mn
Completed
1999
Completed
2000
:C«tnpM0d
-
•.
Sa"
-
.1085
B-14
-------
TECHNOLOGY DEMONSTRATION SITES - BY SITE STATE (continued)
State
l>fev? Jersey
(continued).-
f ., f f >
'
-,', ; :
••
'" ' '" ^ '
-.ss
' ^
New Mexico
New Jcsk
, s
- ", " ••
*
..
•• •
Demonstration
Location
Mill^fllfe, N3f
^fescojlte SJtes •• -* *• '
{Region 2) ;
™
: MorganMtb, N3 "" " "
Injpsrial Oil CQ^Jiic.
sSit
i^6fp.Q|5§-tl:fl.fi(JJl
^
Demonstration
DemonsteatiOiC
-
»«»*?» '
V s
'
•• ••
i
Status
CJompMed
, -
Cbrapleted
1$8&
V \ V ^ ^
srfefed
s
owiEto*) s
199g: ' ' :
Completed. ' :
1995 :
ss '
Completed
1999
. Conqpl^ted
• ' -, "
h^Mi
. i % s s
' '
,
,-
B-15
-------
TECHNOLOGY DEMONSTRATION SITES - BY SITE STATE (continued)
State
Hew York
(continued)
'
V
-
North Carolina
Ohio
Demonstration
Location
: Niagara ialis, NY
{Region 2J, ,
" - • '
',<.
^ : •.. '
\ •,
v
s
i •>
Upstate NY -
-
••. *
V ''''*• f •. ^ *
; tftiea^
^Rtjtiiort 2"5 ""
r ^ :. '
Morrisville, NC
Koppers Site
(Region 4)
: AJiSftes^OH
; Babeefck^tWilcjK
Alliance Research
Technology
Cda'W
Vil^iiiicatjprj
s
f
-
•
'-'
^MimMMtO-
"T
sr •
'
Slurry
fttofegniiflQan
Base-Catalyzed
Destruction
(Dehalogenation)
C^bxM
Vitrjficatfoft
'',
Contact
New JerSeJ?
Institute ?>f
Tsefowlogy
(NIEf)
N^Wark^Nland
Cftfpca^ffesi, Kittg.
of Prussia, PA
Wi.Hi^pi LibiL?;zi
Thomas Tate
610-SS74S15
EuviioMeN "
T'&cteiokijgi^, Ittc,
Gu.©lpby C^n^isi'Aci
Jfpjjltl vQESftJi
(?P ^SKStiV C^J^Sft
Laal6sbUft>, MA
Jim Maxymiiljau
413-4^-3050
Reflifediafion
Technologies. Inc.
Mo Tec Jttft,)
412-826-3340 ,
U.S. EPA/
NRMRL
Cincinnati, OH
George Huffman
513-569-7341
Environmental
Inc.
Blue Bell, PA
Yei-Shong Shieh
215-832-0700
B&feeocfc &
WOcox AlliarKJe
Researcfe Center.
AUisticse, OH
Program
iJMMMralto
,
-
£tetUK8ft*f«l
'
O^rfiofi^tt^.tion,
•
jD0rB.Qn'St3?3.fcEOB.
'
Demonstration
J30ifiojflstra.tidR
Status
OngD&jr
s
"
OBg
-------
TECHNOLOGY DEMONSTRATION SITES - BY SITE STATE (continued)
State
Demonstration
Location
Technology
Contact
Program
Status
Bayton, OH
DOE Basra&l Fe.^%
t^rdbksvtlle, OH
BJosiurry
Realtor
flydtauik; '
Extesetios.
Snvfeibopd Sejil
AmendnJant
,, WA
s%v
'Autora, C0
if^sliftUiiampsi
30M67-8443'
JisaS^rttel-
Cerapteted
2SOO
1997
Oregon
Clackamas, OR
Portable Equipment
Co. Site
(Region 10)
Chemical
Fixation/
Stabilization
Advanced
Remediation
Mixing, Lie.
(formerly Chemfix
Technologies,
Inc.)
Metarie, LA
Sam Pizzitola
504^61-0466
Demonstration
Completed
1989
Pennsylvania
, PA
Solidificatian/
Saz«on and. •• ,
Raster bt»fc ^
Completed.
1987
ApoCo'fiekeh, PL
TRay Fun^erbuik
B-17
-------
TECHNOLOGY DEMONSTRATION SITES - BY SITE STATE (continued)
State
Pennsylvania
(coniteued)
Rhode Island
South Carolina
Tennessee
Demonstration
Location
: Moaa - ,- - -
11 •••. "•••
, •'. , ' '
Central Landfill,
RI
(Region 1)
N. Smithfield, RI
(Region 1)
Sav&iKiali, Rives §4*&»
sc ', ' : " - "
IR^km"*}-
' ' S s^ s ' '
S Ns^^ s j f !•
\
Oak Ridge, TN
(Region 4)
Oak Ridge, TN
DOE Oak Ridge
Facility '
(Region 4)
Technology
Ktattia S,eaCtof
Mertteuift
jyficacofiltottan:
dcjBfained
Rwov«tyoif<2a
Wsstes *
Reverse
Osmosis: Disc-
Tube Module
.Technology
AIRE
Photocatalytic
Technology for
Air Streams
H-gJi Eoergy
- iteadMea for
.Daat?ticli<)aOf
OrgBntcs in
Aqieou* -
SolutiEonsand
SUttdge
Photocatalytic
•Aqueous Phase
Organics
Destruction
Matrix
Freeze Barrier
Contact
H
-------
TECHNOLOGY DEMONSTRATION SITES - BY SITE STATE (continued)
State
Demonstration
Location
Technology
Contact
Program
Status
Texas - -
SanAfttorifci,'D£"
ASC/BMR
Wright iPaifafSo
199? -
2QQQ
PCBs.
512-310-9CJ06
%.-l% Biotegica
ftqducts^CA
Completed,
fees., I0ft
-Damansftation -
Kirs
Damdn&fcafion?
615-483-99^)
Conipfoted.
Cijmipfeted.
1994
Utah
Hill AFB, UT
(Region 8)
Steam Injection/
Vacuum
.Extraction
Praxis
Environmental
Services
San Francisco, CA
Dr. Lloyd Steward
415-641-9044
Demonstration
Midvale Slag, UT
Molecular
Bonding System
Solucorp
Saddleback, NJ
Robert Kuhn
914-623-2333
Demonstration
Completed
1997
Completed
B-19
-------
TECHNOLOGY DEMONSTRATION SITES - BY SITE STATE (continued)
State
Demonstration
Location
Technology
Contact
Program
Status
Utah (continued)
Ogden, UT
Chevron Transfer
Facility
(Region 8)
Phytoremediation
of Petroleum in
Soil and
Groundwater
PhytoMnetics, Inc.
Logan, UT
AriFerro
801-750-0985
Demonstration
Completed
1999
Washington
Ellensburg, WA
(Region 10)
Anaerobic
Biological
Destruction of
Dinoseb in Soil
J. R. Simplot
Company
PocateUo, ID
Tom Yergovich
209-858-2511
Demonstration
Completed
July
1993
Wisconsin
, ViOt ' ..
MSnerg<fl
Art^s
MaiSH
and Supply
Completed
800^5^-7330
SsssiaaPeat
Aqu
3&is
a>
Maniteiag and
Sptta,
aooo
Chwfe"
Various locations
in U.S.
10 sites around the
nation
Alternate Cover
Assessment
Program (ACAP)
U.S. EPA
NRMRL
Demonstration
Ongoing
Canada
Tor6aio,
»TatQfi|o Pott
Completed
1992
Canada
Oatario, Canacia
B-20
-------
Appendix C
PUBLICATIONS - INFORMATION TRANSFER PRODUCT DESCRIPTIONS
C-l
-------
Documents from the
US EPA National Risk Management Research Laboratory
Land Remediation & Pollution Control Division
Demonstration, Emerging, and Measuring & Monitoring Program Publications
General Publications
SITE Program: Annual Report to Congress FY1999 (EPA/540/R-01/500)
SITE Program: Annual Report to Congress FY1998 (EPA/540/R-99/504)
SITE Profiles, Tenth Edition, Demonstration Program, Vol. 1 With addendum
(EPA/540/R-99/500a)
SITE Profiles, Tenth Edition, Emerging Tech. Program, Vol. 2 (EPA/540/R-99/500b)
SITE Profiles, Tenth Edition, Measurement & Mon. Program, Vol. 3 (EPA/540/R-99/500c)
SITE Profiles, Tenth Edition Compact Disc, (EPA/540/C-99/500)
Survey of Materials Handling Technologies Used at Hazardous Waste
Sites (EPA/540/2-91/010) PB91-9212832
Superfund Innovative Technology Evaluation Program: - Innovation Making a Difference
(EPA/540/F-94/505)
Superfund Innovative Technology Evaluation Program: - Technology with an Impact
(EPA/540/F-93/500)
Interim Status Report U.S. and German Bilateral Agreement on Remediation of Hazardous
Waste Sites (EPA/540/R-94/500) PB94-1648112
SITE Innovation on the Move (EPA/540/F-97/500)
Land Remediation & Pollution Control Division; Science and Technology to Treat
Contaminated Soils, Sludge & Sediments (EPA/540/F-98/501)
Demonstration Project Results
Accutech Remedial Systems, Inc.—Pneumatic
Fracturing Extraction and Hot Gas Injec., Phase 1
• Technology Evaluation (EPA/540/R-93/509)
PB93-216596*
• Technology Demo. Summary (EPA/540/SR-
93/509)3
• Demonstration 'Bulletin (EPA/540/MR-93/509)3
• Applications Analysis (EPA/540/AR-93/509)
PB94-1174392
American Combustion, Inc. - Oxygen Enhanced
Incineration
• Technology Evaluation (EPA/540/5-89/008)
• Applications Analysis (EPA/540/A5-89/008)
Technology Demo. Summary (EPA/540/S5-89/008)3
Demonstration Bulletin (EPA/540/M5-89/008)3
AWD Technologies, Inc. - Integrated Vapor Extraction
and Steam Vacuum Stripping
• Applications Analysis (EPA/540/A5-91/002)
PB92-2183792
• Demonstration Bulletin (EPA/540/M5-91/002)3
Babcock & Wilcox Co-Cyclone Furnace
Vitrification
• Technology Evaluation Vol. 1
(EPA/540/R-92/017A) PB92-2222152
• TechnologyEvaluationVol.il
(EPA/540/R-92/017B) PB92-2222232
• Applications Analysis (EPA/540/AR-92/017)
PB93-1223152
1 Order documents free of charge by calling EPA's
National Center for Environmental Publications (NSCEP)
at 1-800-490-9198 or 513-489-8190 or Fax 513-489-8695.
1 Documents with a PB number are out of stock and
must be ordered by that number at cost from:
C-2
National Technical Information Service
5285 Port Royal Road, Springfield ,VA 22161
Telephone: 703-605-6000 or 1-800-553-6847 (U.S. only)
Fax: 703-605-6900
3 Out of stock
-------
Demonstration Project Results (Continued)
• Technology Demo. Summary (EPA/540/SR-
92/017)3
• Demonstration Bulletin (EPA/540/MR-92/011)3
Bergman USA - Soil and Sediment Washing System
• Demonstration Bulletin (EPA/540/MR-92/075)3
• Applications Analysis (EPA/540/AR-92/075)
Biogenesis Enterprises, Inc . - Soil and Sediment
Washing Processes
• Demonstration Bulletin (EPA/540/MR-93/510)
• Innovative Tech. Eval. Report (EPA/540/R-93/510)
• SITE Technology Capsule (EPA/540/SR-93/510)
Bio-Rem, Inc. - Augmented In-Situ Subsurface
Biorem Process
• Demonstration Bulletin (EPA/540/MR-93/527)3
BioTroI - Biological Aqueous Treatment System
• Technology Evaluation (EPA/540/5-91/001)
PB92-1100482
• Applications Analysis (EPA/540/A5-91/001)
PB91-2279832
• Technology Demo. Summary
(EPA/540/S5-91/001)3
• Demonstration Bulletin (EPA/540/M5-91/001)3
- Soil Washing System
• Technology Evaluation Vol. 1
(EPA/540/5-91/003a) PB92-1153102
• Technology Evaluation Vol. 11 Part A
(EPA/540/5-91/003b) PB92-1153282
• Technology Evaluation Vol. 11 Part B
(EPA/540/5-91/003c) PB92-1153362
• Applications Analysis (EPA/540/A5-91/003)
PB92-1152452
• Technology Demo. Summary (EPA/540/S5-91/003)
PB92-2243932
• Demonstration Bulletin (EPA/540/M5-91/003)3
Brice Environmental Services Corporation -
Bescorp Soil Washing System Battery Enterprises
Site
• bemonstration-BuUetin (EPA/540/MR-93/503)3
• Applications Analysis (EPA/540/AR-93/503)
PB95-1997412
Brown and Root Environmental - Subsurface
Volatilization and Ventilation System
• Demonstration Bulletin (EPA/540/MR-94/529)
• Capsule (EPA/540/R-94/529a)
• Innovative Tech. Eval. Report (EPA/540/R-94/529)
Canonie Environmental Services Corporation - Low
Temperature Thermal Aeration (LTTA)
• Demonstration Bulletin (EPA/540/MR-93/504)3
• Applications Analysis (EPA/540/AR-93/504)
CF Systems Corporation - Liquified Gas Solvent
Extraction
• Technology Evaluation Vol. 1 (EPA/540/5-90/002)
« TechnologyEvaluationVol.il
(EPA/540/5-90/002a) PB90-1865032
« Applications Analysis (EPA/540/A5-90/002)
« Technology Demo. Summary (EPA/540/S5-90/002)
Chemfix Technologies, Inc. (Now Advanced
Remediation Mixing, Inc.) - Chemical
Fixation/Stabilization
« Technology Evaluation Vol. 1 (EPA/540/5- 89/01 la)
PB91-1276962
• Technology Evauation Vol.11 (EPA/540/5-89/01 Ib)
PB90-2741272
• Applications Analysis (EPA/540/A5-89/011)
• Technology Demo. Summary (EPA/540/S5-89/011)
PB91-9213732
« Demonstration Bulletin (EPA/540/M5-89/011)3
Chemical Waste Management, Inc. - X-TRAX
Thermal Desorption System (Now OHM
Environmental)
• Demonstration Bulletin (EPA/540/MR-93/502)3
Cognis, Inc. Removal of Lead from Soils
» Demonstration Bulletin (EPA/540/MR-95/535)
« Innovative Tech. Eval. Report (EPA/540/R-96/535)
Dehydro-Tech Corporation - Carver * Greenfield
Process
• Technology Evaluation (EPA/540/R-92/002)
PB92-2174622
« Applications Analysis (EPA/540/AR-92/002)
• Technology Demo. Summary (EPA/540/SR-92/002)
• Demonstration Bulletin (EPA/540/MR-92/002)
Dupont/Oberlin - Membrane Microfiltration System
« Technology Evaluation (EPA/540/5-90/007)
PB92-1534102
• Applications Analysis (EPA/540/A5-90/007)
PB92-1190232
• Technology Demo. Summary (EPA/540/S5-90/007)
PB92-224352
• Demonstration Bulletin (EPA/540/M5-90/007)3
1 Order documents free of charge by calling EPA's
National Center for Environmental Publications (NSCEP)
at 1-800-490-9198 or 513-489-8190 or Fax 513-489-8695.
2 Documents with a PB number are out of stock and
must be ordered by that number at cost from:
C-3
National Technical Information Service
5285 Port Royal Road, Springfield VA 22161
Telephone: 703-605-6000 or 1-800-553-6847 (U.S. only)
Fax: 703-605-6900
3 Out of stock
-------
Demonstration Project Results (Continued)
Dynaphore, Inc. - Forager Sponge Technology
• Demonstration Bulletin (EPA/540/MR-94/522)
• Capsule (EPA/540/R-94/522a)
PB95-2132292
• Innovative Tech. Eval. Rept. (EPA/540/R-94/522)
PB95-2680412
• Innovative Tech. Eval. Rept. (EPA/540/R-94/501)
General Environmental Corporation - CURE
Elecrocoagulation Technology
• Capsule (EPA/540/R-96/502a)
• Innovative Tech. Eval. Rept. (EPA/540/R-96/502)
ECOVA Corporation - Bioslurry Reactor [Pilot-
Scale Demonstration of Slurry-Phase Biological
Reactor for Creosote-Contaminated Wastewater]
• Technology Evaluation Vol. 1 (EPA/540/5-91/009)
PB93-2055322
• Applications Analysis (EPA/540/A5-91/009)
PB94-1240392
• Technology Demo. Summary (EPA/540/S5-91/009)
• Demonstration Bulletin (EPA/540/M5-91/009)3
ELI Eco Logic International, Inc. - GasPhase
Chemical Reduction
• Demonstration Bulletin (EPA/540/MR-93/522)3
• Technology Evaluation Vol. 1
(EPA/540/R-93/522a) PB95-1002512
• Technology Evaluation Appendices
(EPA/540/R-93/522b) PB95-1002512
• Applications Analysis (EPA/540/AR-93/522)
• Technology Demo. Summary (EPA/540/SR-93/522)
- Thermal Desorption Unit
• Demonstration Bulletin (EPA/540/MR-94/504)3
• Applications Analysis (EPA/540/AR-94/504)
EnviroMetal Technologies, Inc. - Metal-Enhanced
Abiotic Degradation Technology
• Demonstration Bulletin (EPA/540/MR-95/510)3
• Capsule (EPA/540/R-96/503a)
• Innovative Tech. Eval. Rept. (EPA/540/R-96/503)
EnviroMetal Technologies, Inc. - Metal-Enhanced
Dechlorination of Volatile organic Compounds
Using an in-situ Reactive iron Wall
• Innovative Tech. Eval. Rept. (EPA/540/R-98/501)
EPOC Water, Inc. - Microfiltration Technology
• Demonstration Bulletin (EPA/540/MR-93/513)3
• Applications Analysis (EPA/540/AR-93/513)
Filter Flow Technology, Inc. - Colloid Polishing
Filter Method
• Demonstration Bulletin (EPA/540/MR-94/501)
• Capsule (EPA/540/R-94/501a) PB95-1227922
GeoTech Development Corporation - Cold Top
Vitrification
• Demonstration Bulletin (EPA/540/MR-97/506)
• Capsule (EPA/540/R-97/506a)
• Innovative Tech. Eval. Rept. (EPA/540/R-97/506)
Geosafe Corporation - In-Situ Vitrification
• Demonstration Bulletin (EPA/540/MR-94/520)3
« Capsule (EPA/540/R-94/520a)
PB95-1771012
• Innovative Tech. Eval. Rept. (EPA/540/R-94/520)
GIS/Solutions, Inc. - CIS/KEY Environmental Data
Management System
• Demonstration Bulletin (EPA/540/MR-94/505)3
• Capsule (EPA/540/SR-94/505)3
• Innovative Tech.' Eval. Rept. (EPA/540/R-94/505)
PB95-1383192
Grace Dearborn Bioremediation Technology
• Demonstration Bulletin (EPA/540/MR-95/536)
• Capsule (EPA/540/R-95/536a)
• Innovative Tech. Eval. Rept. (EPA/540/R-95/536)
Gruppa Italimpresse (developed by Shirco Infrared
Systems, Inc.) - Infrared Incineration
• Technology Evaluation - Peake Oil Vol. 1
(EPA/540/5-88/002a) PB89-1259912
• Technology Evaluation - Peake Oil Vol. 11
(EPA/540/5-88/002b) PB89-1160242
• Technology Evaluation - Rose Township
(EPA/540/5-89/007a) PB89-1679022
• Technology Evaluation - Rose Township Vol. 11
(EPA/540/5-89/007b) PB89-1679102
• Applications Analysis (EPA/540/A5-89/010)
PB89-2334232
• Technology Demo Summary (EPA/540/S5-89/007)3
• Demonstration Bulletin (EPA/540/M5-88/002)3
Hazcon, Inc. (now Funderburk and Assoc.) -
Solidification Process
• Technology Evaluation Vol. 1 (EPA/540/5-89/001a)
PB89-1588102
1 Order documents free of charge by calling EPA's
National Center for Environmental Publications (NSCEP)
at 1-800490-9198 or 513-489-8190 or Fax 513-489-8695.
2 Documents with a PB number are out of stock and
must be ordered by that number at cost from:
C-4
National Technical Information Service
5285 Port Royal Road, Springfield VA 22161
Telephone: 703-605-6000 or 1-800-553-6847 (U.S. only)
Fax: 703-605-6900
3 Out of stock
-------
Demonstration Project Results (Continued)
Technology Evaluation Vol. 11 (EPA/540/5-
89/OOlb) PB89-1588282
Applications Analysis (EPA/540/A5-89/001)
PB89-2060312
Technology Demo Summary (EPA/540/S5-89/001)3
Demonstration Bulletin (EPA/540/M5-89/001)3
High Voltage Environmental Applications Inc.
« Demonstration Bulletin (EPA/540/MR-96/504)
o Innovative Tech. Eval. Kept. (EPA/540/R-96/504)
Horsehead Resource Development Co., Inc. - Flame
Reactor
• Technology Evaluation Vol. 1 (EPA/540/5-91/005)
PB92-2058552
» Applications Analysis (EPA/540/A5-91/005)
PB92-2132142
« Technology Demo Summary (EPA/540/S5-91/005)
• Demonstration Bulletin (EPA/540/M5-91/005)
Hrubetz Environmental Services, Inci - HRUBOUT
Process
• Demonstration Bulletin (EPA/540/MR-93/524)3
Hughes Environmental Systems, Inc. - Steam
Enhanced Recovery Process
• Demonstration Bulletin (EPA/540/MR-94/510)3
• Capsule (EPA/540/R-94/510a)
• Innovative Tech. Eval. Kept. (EPA/540/R-94/510)
IT Research Institute (Brown and Root
Environmental, Inc.) - Radio Frequency Heating
• Demonstration-Bulletin (EPA/540/MR-94/527)
• Capsule (EPA/540/R-94/527a)
• Innovative Tech. Eval. Rept. (EPA/540/R-94/527)
International Waste Technologies/Geo-Con, Inc. -
In-Situ Solidification and Stabilization Process
• Technology Evaluation Vol. 1 (EPA/540/5-89/004a)
PB90-1941612
• Technology Evaluation Appendices
(EPA/540/R-93/522b) PB95-1002512
• TechnologyEvaluationVol.il
(EPA/540/5-89/004b) PB89-1941792
• TechnologyEvaluationVol.il!
(EPA/540/5-89/004c) PB90-2690692
• Technology Evaluation Vol. IV
(EPA/540/5-89/004d) PB90-2690772
• Applications Analysis (EPA/540/A5-89/004)
PB90-2690852
• Technology Demo. Summary
(EPA/540/S5-89/004)3
» Technology Demo. Summary, Update Report
(EPA/540/S5-89/004a)3
• Demonstration Bulletin (EPA/540/M5-89/004)3
KAI Technologies Inc./Brown and Root Environmental
Radio Frequency Heating
• Demonstration Bulletin (EPA/540/MR-94/528)
• Capsule (EPA/540/R-94/528a).
• Innovative Tech. Eval. Report (EPA/540/R-94/528)
MACTEC Inc. (NoVOCs ™) - Well Vapor Stripping
of Ground Water
• Demonstration Capsule (EPA/540/R-00/502)
• Technology Evaluation (EPA/540/R-00/502a)
Magnum Water Technology - CAV-OX Ultraviolet
Oxidation Process
• Demonstration Bulletin (EPA/540/MR-93/520)3
• Applications Analysis (EPA/540/AR-93/520)
PB94-1894382
• Technology Evaluation (EPA/540/R-93/520)
PB95-1661612
• Technology Demo Summary (EPA/540/SR-93/520)3
Matrix Photocatalytic Ltd - Photocatalytic Aqueous
Phase Organics Destruction Process .
• Innovative Tech. Eval, Report (EPA/540/R-97/503)
Maxymillian Technologies (formerly Clean Berkshires,
Inc.) - Thermal Desorption System
" Demonstration Bulletin (EPA/540/MR-94/507)
• Capsule (EPA/540/R-94/507a)
PB95-1228002
National Risk Management Research Laboratory
- and IT Corporation - Debris Washing System
• Technology Evaluation -Vol. 1 (EPA/540/5-91/006a)
PB91-2314562
« Technology Evaluation Vol. 11 (EPA/540/5-9 l/006b)
PB91-2314642
« Technology Demo Summary (EPA/540/S5-91/006)3
- and University of Cincinnati-Hydraulic Fracturing of
Contaminated Soil
• Demonstration Bulletin (EPA/540/MR-93/505)3
• Technology Evaluation and Applications Analysis
Combined (EPA/540/R-93/505) PB94-1001612
» Technology Demo Summary (EPA/540/SR-93/505)3
1 Order documents free of charge by calling EPA's
National Center for Environmental Publications (NSCEP)
at 1-800-490-9198 or 513-489-8190 or Fax 513-489-8695.
2 Documents with a PB number are out of stock and
must be ordered by that number at cost from:
C-5
National Technical Infoimation Service
5285 Port Royal Road, Springfield VA 22161
Telephone: 703-605-6000 or 1-800-553-6847 (U.S. only)
Fax:703-605-6900
3 Out of stock
-------
Demonstration Project Results (Continued)
- and USDA-Forest Products Technology - Fungal
Treatment Technology
• Demonstration Bulletin (EPA/540/MR-93/514)3
- Mobile Volume Reduction Unit at the Sand Creek
Superfund Site
• Treatability Study Bulletin (EPA/540/MR-93/512)3
- Mobile Volume Reduction Unit at the Escambia
Superfund Site
• Treatability Study Bulletin (EPA/540/MR-93/5II)3
- Volume Reduction Unit
• Demonstration Bulletin (EPA/540/MR-93/508)
• Applications Analysis (EPA/540/AR-93/508)
• Technology Evaluation (EPA/540/R-93/508)3
PB94-1362642
• Technology Demo Summary (EPA/540/SR-93/508)
New York State Multi-Vendor Bioremediation:
- ENSR Consulting & Engineering/Larson
Engineers - Ex-Situ Biovault
• Demonstration Bulletin (EPA/540/MR-95/524)
- R.E. Wright Environmental Inc. - In-Situ
Bioremediation System
• Demonstration Bulletin (EPA/540/MR-95/525)
-SBP/EII - Groundwater Circulation Biological
Treatment
• Capsule (EPA/540/R-99/503a)
• Innovative Tech. Eval. Report (EPA/540/R-99/503)
North American Technologies Group, Inc. - SFC
Oleofiltration System
• Demonstration Bulletin (EPA/540/MR-94/525)
• Capsule (EPA/540/R-94/525a)
PB95-1672272
* Innovative Tech. Eval. Rept. (EPA/540/R-94/525)
Ogden Environmental Services, Inc. (now General
Atomics) - Ogden Circulating Bed Combustor
• Demonstration Bulletin (EPA/540/MR-92/001)3
• Technology Evaluation (EPA/540/R-92/001)
PB92-2272892
Peroxidation Systems, Inc. (now Calgon Carbon
Oxidation Technologies) - Perox-Pure™ Chemical
Oxidation
• Demonstration Bulletin (EPA/540/MR-93/501)3
• Applications Analysis (EPA/540/AR-93/501)
PB94-1303252
• Technology Evaluation (EPA/540/R-93/501)
PB93-2135282
• Technology Demo Summary (EPA/540/SR-93/501)3
Pintail Systems Inc. - Aqueous Biocyanide Process
• Capsule (EPA/540/R-00/501a
Resources Conservation Company - The Basic
Extractive Sludge Treatment (B.E.S.T.) - Solvent
Extraction
• Demonstration Bulletin (EPA/540/MR-92/079)3
• Applications Analysis (EPA/540/AR-92/079)
• Technology Evaluation -Vol. 1
(EPA/540/R-92/079a) PB93-2271222
• Technology Evaluation Vol. 11, Part 1
(EPA/540/R-92/079b) PB93-2271302
• Technology Evaluation Vol. 11, Part 2
(EPA/540/R-92/079c) PB93-2271482
• Technology Evaluation Vol. 11, Part 3
(EPA/540/R-92/079d) PB93-2271552
• Technology Demo Summary (EPA/540/SR-92/079)
Retech, Inc. - Plasma Centrifugal Furnace (Plasma
Arc Vitrification)
• Demonstration Bulletin (EPA/540/M5-91/007)
• Technology Evaluation -Vol. 1 (EPA/540/5-91/007a)
PB92-2160352
• Technology Evaluation Vol. 11 (EPA/540/5-91/007b)
PB92-2160432
• Applications Analysis (EPA/540/A5-91/007)
PB92-2187912
• Technology Demo Summary (EPA/540/S5-91/007)
Rochem Separations Systems, Inc. - Disc Tube Module
Technology
• Demonstration Bulletin (EPA/540/MR-96/507)
• Capsule (EPA/540/R-96/507a)
• Innovative Tech. Eval. Report (EPA/540/R-96/507)
Rocky Mountain Remediation Services - Envirobond
(TM) Process
• Demonstration Bulletin (EPA/540/MR-99/502)
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
- and IEG Technologies-Unterdruck-Verdampfer-
Brunner Technology (UVB) Vacuum Vaporizing
Well
• Demonstration Bulletin (EPA/540/MR-95/500)
• Capsule (EPA/540/R-95/500a)
• Innovative Tech. Eval. Rept. (EPA/540/R-95/500)
1 Order documents free of -charge by calling EPA's
National Center for Environmental Publications (NSCEP)
at 1-800-490-9198 or 513-489-8190 or Fax 513-489-8695.
2Documents with aPB number are out'of stock and
must be ordered by that number at cost from:
C-6
. National Technical Information Service
5285 Port Royal Road, Springfield VA 22161
Telephone: 703-605-6000 or 1-800-553-6847 (U.S. only)
Fax: 703-605-6900
3 Out of stock
-------
Demonstration Project Results (Continued)
Low Temperature Thermal Treatment (LT3)
System
• Demonstration Bulletin (EPA/540/MR-92/019)3
• Applications Analysis (EPA/540/AR-92/019)
Sandia National Labs - In Situ Electrokinetic
Extraction System
• Demonstration Bulletin (EPA/540/MR-97/509)
• Capsule (EPA/540/R-97/509a)
• Innovative Tech. Eval. Kept. (EPA/540/R-97/509)
SBP Technologies, Inc. - Membrane Filtration and
Bioremediation
• Demonstration Bulletin (EPA/540/MR-92/014)3
• Applications Analysis (EPA/540/AR-92/014)
Silicate Technology Corporation (Now STC Omega)
- Solidification/Stabilization of Organic/Inorganic
Contaminants
• Demonstration Bulletin (EPA/540/MR-92/010)3
• Applications Analysis (EPA/540/AR-92/010)
PB93-1729482'
• Technology Evaluation (EPA/540/R-92/010)
PB95-2557092
• Technology Demo Summary (EPA/540/SR-92/010)3
Simplot, J.R. - Ex Situ Anaerobic Bioremediation
Technology: TNT
• Demonstration Bulletin (EPA/540/MR-95/529)
• Capsule (EPA/540/R-95/529a)
• Innovative Tech. Eval. Report (EPA/540/R-95/529)
Simplot, J.R. - Ex-Situ Anaerobic Bioremediation
Technology: Dinoseb
• Demonstration Bulletin (EPA/540/MR-94/508)
• Capsule (EPA/540/R-94/508a)
• Innovative Tech. Eval. Report (EPA/540/R-94/508)
Soiltech ATP Systems, Inc.
- Aostra-SoilTech Anaerobic Thermal Process
• Demonstration Bulletin (EPA/540/MR-92/008)
- SoilTech Anaerobic Thermal Processor
• Demonstration Bulletin (EPA/540/MR-92/078)3
Soliditech, Inc. - Solidification and Stabilization
• Technology Evaluation -Vol. 1
(EPA/540/5-89/005a) PB90-1917502
• TechnologyEvaluationVol.il ;
(EPA/540/5-89/005b) PB90-1917682
» Applications Analysis (EPA/540/A5-89/005)
PB91-1298172
• Technology Demo Summary (EPA/540/S5-89/005)3
« Demonstration BuUetin (EPA/540/M5-89/005)3
Solucorp® Industries Ltd. Molecular Bonding
System®
» Demonstration Bulletin (EPA/540/MR-97/507
« Innovative Tech. Eval. Report (EPA/540/R-97/507)
Sonotech, Inc. - Cello Pulse Combustion Burner
System
• Demonstration BuUetin (EPA/540/MR-95/502)3
. • Capsule (EPA/540/R-95/502a)
• Innovative Tech. Eval. Report (EPA/540/R-95/502)
• Summary (EPA/600/SR-97/061)
Star Organics - Soil Rescue Remediation Solution
• Demonstration Bulletin (EPA/540/MR-99/501)
TerraKleen Response Group, Inc. - Solvent Extraction
Treatment System
• Demonstration Bulletin (EPA/540/MR-94/521)3
• Capsule (EPA/540/R-94/521a) PB95-2136172
« Innovative Tech. Eval. Report (EPA/540/R-94/521)
Terra Vac, Inc. - In Situ Vacuum Extraction
• Demonstration BuUetin (EPA/540/M5-89/003)3
• Technology Evaluation-Vol. 1 (EPA/540/5-89/003a)
PB89-1920252
• Technology Evaluation Vol. 11 (EPA/540/5-89/003b)
PB89-1920332
• Applications Analysis (EPA/540/A5-89/003)
• Technology Demo Summary (EPA/540/S5-89/003)3
Texaco, Inc. - Entrained-Bed Gasification Process
• Demonstration BuUetin (EPA/540/MR-94/514)
• Capsule (EPA/540/R-94/514a)
• Innovative Tech. Eval. Report (EPA/540/R-94/514)
Thorneco, Inc. - Enzyme - Activated Cellulose
Technology
• Treatability Study BuUetin (EPA/540/MR-92/018)3
Toronto Harbour Commission - Soil Recycling •
Treatment Train
• Demonstration BuUetin (EPA/540/MR-92/015)
• Applications Analysis (EPA/540/AR-93/517)
• Technology Evaluation (EPA/540/R-93/517)
PB93-2160672
1 Order documents free of charge by calling EPA's
National Center for Environmental Publications (NSCEP)
at 1-800-490-9198 or 513-489-8190 or Fax 513-489-8695.
2Documents with a PB number are out-of stock and
must be ordered by that number at cost from:
C-7
National Technical Information Service
5285 Port Royal Road, Springfield VA 22161
Telephone: 703-605-6000 or 1-800-553-6847 (U.S. only)
Fax: 703-605-6900
3 Out of stock
-------
Demonstration Project Results (Continued)
• Technology Demo Summary (EPA/540/SR-93/517)
Toxic Treatments USA, Inc. (Now NOVATERRA,
Inc.) - In-Situ Steam/Hot Air Stripping
• Demonstration Bulletin (EPA/540/M5-90/003)
« Applications Analysis (EPA/540/A5-90/008)
University of Nebraska-Lincoln - Sprinkler
irrigation as a VOC Separation and Disposal
Method
• Innovative Tech. Eval. Report (EPA/540/R-98/502)
Ultrox, a Division of Zimpro Environmental, Inc. -
UV Ozone Treatment for Liquids
• Demonstration Bulletin (EPA/540/M5-89/012)3
« Applications Analysis (EPA/540/A5-89/012)
PB91-1297592
• Technology Evaluation (EPA/540/5-89/012)
PB90-1981772
« Technology Demo Summary (EPA/540/S5-89/012)3
U.S. EPA - McColl Superfund Site - Demonstration
of a Trial Excavation
• Technology Evaluation (EPA/540/R-92/015)
PB92-2264482
• Applications Analysis (EPA/540/AR-92/015)
PB93-1001212
• Technology Demo Summary (EPA/540/SR-92/015)
Western Research Institute - Contained Recovery
of Oily Wastes (CROW) Process
• Innovative Tech. Eval. Report (EPA/540/R-00/500)
PB2000-1066882
Wheelabrator Clean Air Systems, Inc. (formerly
Chemical Waste Management, Inc.) -
PO*WW*ER™ Technology
• Demonstration Bulletin (EPA/540/MR-93/506)3
• Applications Analysis (EPA/540/AR-93/506)
• Technology Evaluation -Vol. 1
(EPA/540/R-93/506a) PB94-1606372
• Technology Evaluation Vol. 11
(EPA/540/R-93/506b) PB94-1606602
• Technology Demo Summary (EPA/540/SR-93/506)
Zenon Environmental, Inc. - Zenon Cross-
FlowPervaporation Technology
• Demonstration Bulletin (EPA/540/MR-95/511)
• Capsule (EPA/540/R-95/511a)
• Innovative Tech. Eval. Report (EPA/540/R-95/511)
Zenon Environmental Systems - Zenogem Wastewater
Treatment Process
• Demonstration Bulletin (EPA/540/MR-95/503)3
• Capsule (EPA/540/R-95/503a)3
• Innovative Tech. Eval. Report (EPA/540/R-95/503)
Order documents free of charge by calling EPA's
National Center for Environmental Publications (NSCEP)
at 1-800-490-9198 or 513-489-8190 or Fax 513-489-8695.
Documents with a PB number are out'of stock and
must be ordered by that number at cost from:
C-8
National Technical Information Service
5285 Port Royal Road, Springfield VA 22161
Telephone: 703-605-6000 or 1-800-553-6847 (U.S. only)
Fax: 703-605-6900
3 Out of stock
-------
Emerging Technologies Program Reports
General Publications
. SITE Emerging Technology Program (Brochure) (EPA/540/F-95/502)
ABB Environmental Services, Inc. - Two Zone PCE
Bioremediation System
. Emerging Tech. Bulletin (EPA/540/F-95/510)
Aluminum Company of America - Bioscrubber for
Removing Hazardous Organic Emission from Soil,
Water, and Air Decontamination Process
. Emerging Tech. Bulletin (EPA/540/F-93/507)3
. Emerging Tech. Summary (EPA/540/SR-93/521)3
. Emerging Tech. Report (EPA/540/R-93/521)
PB93-2270252
. Journal Article AWMA Vol. 44, No. 3, March 1994
Arizona State University - Integration of
Photocatalytic Oxidation with Air Stripping of
Contaminated Aquifers
. Emerging Tech. Summary (EPA/540/SR-98/504)
. Emerging Tech. Report (EPA/540/R-98/504)3
PB99-127920
Atomic Energy of Canada, Limited - Chemical
Treatment and Ultrafiltration
. Emerging Tech. Bulletin (EPA/540/F-92/002)3
Babcock & Wilcox Co. - Cyclone Furnace (Soil
Vitrification)
• Emerging Tech. Bulletin (EPA/540/F-92/010)
. Emerging Tech. Summary (EPA/540/SR-93/507)
. Emerging Tech. Report (EPA/540/R-93/507)
PB93-1630382
Batelle Memorial Institute - In Situ Elecroacoustic
Soil Decontamination
. Emerging Tech. Summary (EPA/540/S5-90/004)3
. Emerging Tech. Report (EPA/540/5-90/004)
PB90-2047282
Bio-Recovery Systems, Inc. - Removal and Recovery
of Metal Ions from Ground-water (AlgaSORB)
. Emerging Tech. Bulletin (EPA/540/F-92/003)3
» Emerging Tech. Summary (EPA/540/S5-90/005)3
« Emerging Tech. Report (EPA/540/5-90/005a)
PB90-2525942
• Emerging Tech. Report - Appendices
(EPA/540/5-90/005b) PB90-2526022
Biotrol, Inc. - Mehanotrophic Bioreactor System
. Emerging Tech. Bulletin (EPA/540/F-93/506)3
. Emerging Tech. Summary (EPA/540/SR-93/505)3
. Journal Article AWMA Vol. 45, No.l, Jan. 1995
Center for Hazardous Materials Research
- Acid Extraction Treatment System for Treatment •
of Metal Contaminated Soils
• Emerging Tech. Summary (EPA/540/SR-94/513)3
e Emerging Tech. Report (EPA/540/R-94/513)
PB94-1881092
-Simultanious Destruction of Organics and
Stabilization of Metals in Soils
. Emerging Tech. Summary (EPA/540/SR-98/500)
• Emerging Tech. Report (EPA/540/R-98/500)2
PB98-133150
- Reclamation of Lead from Superfund Waste Material
Using Secondary Lead Smelters
. Emerging Tech. Bulletin (EPA/540/F-94/510)
• Emerging Tech. Summary (EPA/540/SR-95/504)
• Emerging Tech. Report (EPA/540/R-95/504)
PB9-1990222
Colorado School of Mines - Constructed Wetlands-
Based Treatment
. Emerging Tech. Bulletin (EPA/540/F-92/001)3
. Emerging Tech. Summary (EPA/540/SR-93/523)
. Emerging Tech. Report (EPA/540/R-93/523)
PB93-2339142
University of Dayton Research Institute - Development
of a Photothermal Detoxification Unit
. Emerging Tech. Bulletin (EPA/540/F-95/505)3
. Emerging Tech. Summary (EPA/540/SR-95/526)3
• Emerging Tech. Report (EPA/540/R-95/526)
PB95-2557332
Electro-Pure Systems, Inc. - Alternating Current
Electrocoagulation Technology
1 Order documents free of charge by calling EPA's
National Center for Environmental Publications (NSCEP)
at 1-800-490-9198 or 513-489-8190 or Fax 513-489-8695.
2 Documents with a PB number are out of stock and
must be ordered by that number at cost from:
National Technical Information Service
5285 Port Royal Road, Springfield VA 22161
Telephone: 703-605-6000 or 1-800-553-6847 {U.S. only)
Fax: 703-605-6900
3 Out of stock
C-9
-------
Emerging Technologies Program Reports (Continued)
. Emerging Tech. Bulletin (EPA/540/F-92/0II)3
• Emerging Tech. Summary (EPA/540/S-93/504)3
. Journal Article AWMA Vol 43, No.5, May 1993
Electrokinetics Inc. - Insitu Bio Remediation by
Electrokinetic Injection
• Emerging Tech. Summary (EPA/540/SR-00/503)
Electrokinetics Inc. - Theoretical and Experimental
Modeling of Multispecies.... Electrokinetic Soil
Processing
• Emerging Tech. Bulletin (EPA/540/F-95/504)
• Emerging Tech. Summary (EPA/600/SR-97/054)
• Emerging Tech. Report (EPA/600/R-97/0541
PB97--1930562
Energy and Environmental Engineering - Laser-
Induced Photochemical Oxidative Destruction
• Emerging Tech. Bulletin (EPA/540/F-92/004)
. Emerging Tech. Summary (EPA/540/SR-92/080)
. Emerging Tech. Report (EPA/540/R-92/080)
PB93-1314312
Energy and Environmental Research Corporation -
Hybrid Fluidized Bed System
. Emerging Tech. Bulletin (EPA/540/F-93/508)
FERRO Corporation - Waste Vitrification Through
Electric Melting
. Emerging Tech. Bulletin (EPA/540/F-95/503)
Florida International University (or Electron Beam
Research Facility)
- Electron Beam Treatment for Removal of Benzene
and Toluene from Aqueous Streams and Sludge
. Emerging Tech. Bulletin (EPA/540/F-93/502)3
- Electron Beam Treatment for the
Trichlorocthylene and Tetrachloroethylene from
Aqueous Stream
. Emerging Tech. Bulletin (EPA/540/F-92/009)3
- Removal of Phenol from Aqueous Solutions Using
High Energy Electron Beam Irradiation
. Emerging Tech. Bulletin (EPA/540/F-93/509)3
Institute of Gas Technology
- Chemical and Biological Treatment (CBT)
. Emerging Tech. Bulletin (EPA/540/F-94/504)3
- Fluid Extraction-Biological Degradation Process
. Emerging Tech, Bulletin (EPA/540/F-94/501 )3
IT Corporation - Innovative Methods for Bioslurry
Treatment
• Emerging Tech. Bulletin (EPA/540/F-96/505)
. Emerging Tech. Summary (EPA/540/SR-96/505)
• Emerging Tech. Report (EPA/540/R-96/505)
PB97-1768202
IT Corporation - Photolysis/Biodegradation of PCB and
PCDD/PCDF Contaminated Soils
. Emerging Tech. Bulletin (EPA/540/F-94/502)
. Emerging Tech. Summary (EPA/540/SR-94/531)
. Emerging Tech. Report (EPA/540/R-94/531)
PB95-1599922
IT Corporation - Process for the Treatment of Volatile
Organic Carbon & Heavy-Metal Contaminated Soil
• Emerging Tech. Bulletin (EPA/540/F-95/509)
J.R. Simplot - Anaerobic Destruction of Nitroaromaiics
(the SABRE Process)
» Journal Article App. Env. Micro, Vol. 58, No. 5, May
1992, pp. 1683-89
Matrix Photocatalytic, Inc. - Photocatalytic Water
Treatment
« Published Paper (EPA/600/A-93/282)
PB94-1301842
Membrane Technology and Research, Inc. - Volatile
Organic Compound Removal from Air Streams by
Membrane Separation
« Emerging Tech. Bulletin (EPA/540/F-94/503)
M.L. Energia - Reductive Photo-Dechlorination Process
for Safe Conversion of Hazardous Chlorocarbon Waste
Streams
• Emerging Tech. Bulletin (EPA/540/F-94/508)
New Jersey Institute of Technology - GHEA Associates
Process for Soil Washing and Wastewater Treatment
. Emerging Tech. Bulletin (EPA/540/F-94/509)
PURUS, Inc. - Photolytic Oxidation Process
[Destruction of Organic Contaminants in Air Using
Advanced Ultraviolet Flashlamps]
• Emerging Tech: Bulletin (EPA/540/F-93/501 )3
• Emerging Tech. Summary (EPA/540/SR-93/516)3
. Emerging Tech. Report (EPA/540/R-93/516)
PB93-2053832
' Order documents free of charge by calling EPA's .
National Center for Environmental Publications (NSCEP)
at 1-800-490-9198 or 513-489-8190 or Fax 513-489-8695.
2 Documents with a PB number are out of stock and
must bo ordered by that number at cost from:
National Technical Information Service
5285 Port Royal Road, Springfield VA 22161
Telephone: 703-605-6000 or 1-800-553-6847 (U.S. only)
Fax: 703-605-6900
3 Out of stock
C-10
-------
Emerging Technologies Program Reports (Continued)
Roy F. Weston, Inc. - Ambersorb 563 Adsorbent
. Emerging Tech. Bulletin (EPA/540/F-95/500)
. Emerging Tech. Summary (EPA/540/SR-95/516)
. Emerging Tech. Report (EPA/540/R-95/516)
PB95-2641642
University of Washington - Metals Treatment at
Superfund Sites by Adsorptive Filtration
. Emerging Tech. Bulletin (EPA/540/F-92/008)3
. Emerging Tech. Summary (EPA/540/SR-93/515)3
. Emerging Tech. Report (EPA/540/R-93/515)
PB93-2311652
Vortec Corporation - Vitrification
• Published Paper, Glass Production Technol •
International, 1994, p. 103 - 106
• Emerging Tech. Summary (EPA/540/S-97/501)4
Wastewater Technology Centre - [A] Cross-Flow
Pervaporation System [for Removal of VOC's from
Contaminated Water]
. Emerging Tech. Bulletin (EPA/540/F-93/503)3
. Emerging Tech. Summary (EPA/540/SR-94/512)3
. Emerging Tech. Report (EPA/540/R-94/512)
PB94-1702302
1 Order documents free of charge by calling EPA's
National Center for Environmental Publications (NSCEP)
at 1-800-490-9198 or 513-489-8190 or Fax 513-489-8695.
^Documents with a PB number are out of stock and
must be ordered by that number at cost from:
National Technical Information Service
5285 Port Royal Road, Springfield VA 22161
Telephone: 703-605-6000 or 1-800-553-6847 (U.S. only)
Fax: 703-605-6900
3 Out of stock
C-ll
-------
Measuring and Monitoring Program Reports
Cone Penetrometers
Bruker Mobile Environmental Monitor
• Technology Evaluation Report (EPA/600/X-91/079)
Loral Rapid Optical Screening Tool (ROST)
• Demonstration Bulletin (EPA/540/MR-95/519)
• Innovative Tech. Eval. Report (EPA/540/R-95/519)
Site Characterization Analysis Penetrometer System
(SCAPS)
• Demonstration Bulletin (EPA/540/MR-95/520)
• Innovative Tech. Eval. Report (EPA/540/R-95/520)
Field Portable X-Ray Fluorescence
HNU Systems SEFA-P Field Portable X-ray
Fluorescence
• Innovative Tech. Eval. Report (EPA/600/R-97/144)
Metorex X-Met 920P and 940 Field Portable X-ray
Fluorescence
• Innovative Tech. Eval. Report (EPA/600/R-97/146)
Metorex X-Met 920MP Field Portable X-ray
Fluorescence
• Innovative Tech. Eval. Report (EPA/600/R-97/151)
Niton XL Spectrum Field Portable X-ray Fluorescence
• Innovative Tech. Eval. Report (EPA/600/R-97/150)
SciTec MAP Spectrum Field Portable X-ray
Fluorescence
• Innovative Tech. Eval. Report (EPA/600/R-97/147)
TN Spectrace TN9000 and TN Pb Field Portable X-ray
Fluorescence Analyzers
• Innovative Tech. Eval. Report (EPA/600/R-97/145)
Field Analytical Screening Program (FASP) Method
forPCP
• Demonstration Bulletin (EPA/540/R-95/528)
• Innovative Tech. Eval. Report (EPA/540/MR-95/528)
Field Analytical Screening Program (FASP) Method
forPCB
• Demonstration Bulletin (EPA/540/R-95/521)
• Innovative Tech. Eval. Report (EPA/540/MR-95/521)
HNU Portable Gas Chromatograph
• Results reported in the Proceedings of the U.S. EPA
Third International Field Screening Symposium
Volume 2, Pages 682-693 (1993)
Photovac Portable Gas Chromatograph
• Results reported in the Proceedings of the U.S. EPA
Third International Field Screening Symposium
Volume 2, Pages 682-693 (1993)
Sentex Portable Gas Chromatograph
• Results reported in the Proceedings of the U.S. EPA
Third International Field Screening Symposium
Volume 2, Pages 682-693 (1993)
SRI Instruments Low Temperature Thermal
Desorption System
• Results reported in the Proceedings of the U.S. EPA
Third International Field Screening Symposium
Volume 2, Pages 682-693 (1993)
Spectrometers
Portable Gas Chromatographs
Analytical & Remedial Technology Purge and Trap
Gas Chromatographic Manifdd System (AVOS)
• Technology Evaluation Report (EPA/600/R-93/109)
MDA Scientific Long-Path Fourier Transform
Infrared Spectrometer
• Technology Evaluation Report (EPA/600/S3-91/071)
Xontech, Inc. Canister-based Sector Sample
• Report (EPA/600/S3-91/071)
1 Order documents free of charge by calling EPA s
National Center for Environmental Publications (NSCEP)
at 1-800-490-9198 or 513-489-8190 or Fax 513-489-8695.
Documents with a PB number are out of stock and
must be ordered by that number at cost from:
National Technical Information Service
5285 Port Royal Road, Springfield VA 22161
Telephone: 703-605-6000 or 1-800-553-6847 (U.S. only)
Fax: 703-605-6900
3 Out of stock
C-12
-------
Measuring and Monitoring Program Reports (Continued)
PCP/PCB Immunoassay Test Kits
Char-N-Soil PCB Test Kit - Dexel
. Demonstration Bulletin (EPA/540/MR-95/518)
• Innovative Tech. Eval. Report (EPA/540/ R-95/518)
EnviroGard PCB Test Kit - Millipore Inc.
• Demonstration Bulletin (EPA/540/MR-95/517)
• Innovative Tech. Eyal. Report (EPA/540/ R-95/517)
Millipore Immunoasay Test Kit for PCB
. Demonstration Bulletin (EPA/540/MR-95/517)
. Innovative Tech. Eval. Report (EPA/540/ R-95/517)
PCP Immunoassay Technologies: Ensys Inc. - PENTA
Rise: Ohmicron Corp., - Penta RaPid; Millipore Inc. -
Envirogard
• Demonstration Bulletin (EP A/540/MR-95/515)
. Innovative Tech. Eval. Report (EPA/540/ R-95/514)
U-Hanby PCP Test Kit
. Demonstration Bulletin (EPA/540/MR-95/515)
. Innovative Tech. Eval. Report (EPA/540/ R-95/515)
Westinghouse PCP Test Kit
Technology Evaluation Report (EPA/600/X-90/146)
Soil & Soil Gas Samples
Art's Manufacturing Soil Sampler
« Innovative Tech. Eval. Report (EPA/600/R-98/093)
Clements & Associates Soil Sampler
• Innovative Tech. Eval. Report (EPA/600/R-98/097)
Geoprobe® Soil Sampler
• Innovative Tech. Eval. Report (EPA/600/R-98/092)
Simulprobe® Soil Sampler
. Innovative Tech. Eval. Report (EPA/600/R-98/094)
Quandrel Soil Gas Sampler
• Innovative Tech. Eval. Report (EPA/600/R-98/096)
W.L. Gore & Associates Soil Gas Sampler
• Innovative Tech. Eval. Report (EPA/600/R-98/095)
1 Order documents free of charge by calling EPA's
National Center for Environmental Publications (NSCEP)
at 1-800-490-9198 or 513-489-8190 or Fax 513-489-8695.
2 Documents with a PB number are out of stock and
must be ordered by that number at cost from:
National Technical Information Service
5285 Port Royal Road, Springfield VA 22161
Telephone: 703-605-6000 or 1-800-553-6847 (U.S. only)
Fax: 703-605-6900
3 Out of stock
C-13
-------
-------
Appendix D
ELECTRONIC TECHNICAL INFORMATION RESOURCES
D-l
-------
CONTENTS
REMEDIATION TECHNOLOGIES D-3
Electronic Information Sources D-3
Innovation Remediation Technologies: Field-Sectors Demonstration Projects in North America, Second
Edition and Database D-3
Hazardous Waste Clean-Up Information (CLU-IN) Home Page D-3
Innovative Treatment Technologies: Annual Status Report (Tenth Edition) EPA 542/R-01-004 .. D-3
EPA Technologies CEPAREACHIT) D-3
Site Remediation Technology Infobase D-3
Cost and Performance Catalog of Case Studies D-4
Remediation Technologies Screening Matrix and Reference Guide, Version 3.0 D-4
TechDirect D-4
Programs, Partnerships, And Organizations D-4
EPA Library Network Program D-4
Federal Remediation Technologies Roundtable (FRTR) D-4
Ground-Water Remediation Technologies Analysis Center (GWRTAC) D-4
Office of Research and Development (ORD) D-4
Remediation Technologies Development Forum (RTDF) , D-5
Superfund Innovative Technology Evaluation (SITE) Demonstration Program D-5
Interstate Technology Regulatory Cooperative (ITRC)
Technology Innovation Office (TIO) D-5
SITE CHARACTERIZATION TECHNOLOGIES D-5
Electronic Sources of Infonnation D-5
EPA, National Exposure Research Laboratory - Hazardous Waste
Site Characterization (on CD-ROM) (EPA 600-C-96-001) D-5
Field Sampling and Analysis Technologies Matrix D-6
TechDirect D-6
Programs, Partnerships, and Organizations D-6
Consortium for Site Characterization and Technology (CSCT) D-6
Environmental Technology Verification Program D-6
EPA Library Network Program D-6
Office of Research and Development (ORD) D-6
Superfund Innovative Technology Evaluation (SITE) Demonstration Program D-7
Technology Innovation Office (TIO) D-7
D-2
-------
EPA Sources of Information on
Innovative Remediation and Site Characterization Technologies
Listed below are U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) sources of information on Innovative Remediation
and Site Characterization Technologies. Sources of information include: electronic information sources in the form of
databases or Internet sites, as well as programs, partnerships and organizations accessible on the Internet.
REMEDIATION TECHNOLOGIES
Electronic Information Sources
Innovative Remediation Technoliges: Field-Scale
Demonstration Projects in North America, Second
Edition and Database. The searchable database contains
information about 600 completed innovative technology
field demonstration projects in North America. The
purpose of the database is to consolidate key information
from innovative demonstration projects into a single
source and present that information in a format that
enables the user to easily identify innovative technologies
that may be appropriate to the user's particular site
remediation needs. The database, which is limited to
completed demonstration projects and a small number of
full-scale cleanup efforts, does not include emerging
technologies or laboratory-scale projects. A summary
report, EPA 542-BOO/004 of the same name is available
from EPA's National Service Center for Environmental
Publications or accessed free of charge from the CLU-IN
Internet site at .
Hazardous Waste Clean-Up Information (CLU-IN)
Home Page. CLU-IN is a streamlined source of
information about innovative remediation and site
characterization technologies for hazardous waste cleanup
professionals. It provides access to information about
programs, organizations, publications, and other tools for
EPA and other Federal and State personnel, consulting
engineers, technology developers and venders,
remediation contractors, researchers, community groups,
and individual citizens. Access to various pools of
information is presented in the form of downloadable
publications and databases. Sources of additional
information on the Internet also are presented through a
series of links. CLU-IN is sponsored by EPA's
Technology Innovation Office (TIO). For additional
information about the CLU-IN home page, call .(301) 589-
5318. CLU-IN can be accessed through the Internet at
.
Innovative Treatment Technologies: Annual Status
Report (Tenth Edition) EPA/542/R-01/004 This report
contains information about remedies selected at
contaminated waste sites. The sites include Superfund
remedial and removal sites and some non-Superfund sites
being remediated by the U.S. Department of Energy
(DOE), the U.S. Department of Defense (DoD), or under
the RCRA corrective action program. The EPA REACfflT
online system (see description) includes such site-specific
data as contaminants and media treated, project status, and
site contact. If you have questions or comments about the
system, please call EPA's TIO at (301) 589-5318. The
report can be downloaded free of charge from the CLU-IN
Internet site at . To obtain a copy of
the report, call EPA's National Service Center for
Environmental Publications at (800) 490-9198 or (513)
489-8190.
EPA Remediation and Characterization Innovative
Technologies (EPA REACH IT). EPA REACH IT,
sponsored by EPA's Technology Innovation Office, is a new
system that lets environmental professionals use the power
of the Internet to search, view, download, and print
information about innovative remediation and
characterization technologies. EPA REACH IT provides
information about more than 750 service providers that offer
almost 1,300 remediation technologies and more than 150
characterization technologies. EPA REACH IT combines
information from three established EPA databases, the
Vendor Information System for Innovative Treatment
Technologies (YISITT), the Vendor Field Analytical and
Characterization Technologies System (Vendor FACTS),
and the Innovative Treatment Technologies (ITT), to give
users access to comprehensive information about treatment
and characterization technologies and their applications. It
combines information submitted by technology service
providers about remediation and characterization
technologies with information from EPA, the U.S.
Department of Defense (DoD), the U.S. Department of
Energy (DOE), and state project managers about sites at
which innovative technologies are being deployed. EPA
REACH IT can be accessed through the Internet at
. It is best viewed using
Netscape Navigator or Microsoft Internet Explorer, version
4.0 or higher.
Site Remediation Technology Infobase. The Site
Remediation Technology Infobase was founded by EPA and
prepared for the federal agencies participating in the Federal
Remediation Technologies Roundtable. It provides
information on federal cleanup programs; federal site
remediation technology development assistance programs,
and databases; federal.electronic resources for site
remediation; other electronic resources for site remediation
technology information; a bibliography of selected federal
publications on alternative and innovative site remediation
D-3
-------
technologies; technology survey reports; and technology
program contacts for DOD, DOE, and EPA. It can be
accessed through the Internet at:
.
Cost and Performance Catalog of Case Studies. The
Cost and Performance Catalog of Case Studies is a joint
effort of Federal Remediation Technologies Roundtable
members to publish case study reports on full- and
demonstration-scale remediation projects. As of May
2001, member agencies of the Roundtable have completed
274 cost and performance case study reports. The reports
(March 1995-May 2001) can be accessed by the Cost and
Performance Case Studies Search:
.
Remediation Technologies Screening Matrix and
Reference Guide, Version 3.0. The Remediation
Technologies Screening Matrix and Reference Guide,
Version 3.0, prepared for federal agencies participating on
the Federal Remediation Technology Roundtable (FRTR),
provides a "yellow pages" of remediation technologies
information. The guide is intended to assist remedial
project managers (RPM) to screen and evaluate candidate
cleanup technologies and select the best remedial
alternative(s) for contaminated installations, facilities, or
waste sites. The guide also assists environmental
professionals in gathering essential descriptive
information on the respective technologies. The guide
incorporates cost and performance data to the maximum
extent available and focuses primarily on demonstrated
technologies. However, information on emerging
technologies also is included in the guide. The guide can
be accessed through the Internet at .
TechDirect. TechDirect, hosted by EPA's TIO, is an
information service that highlights new publications and
events of interest to environmental professionals.
Information about site characterization and remediation
technologies is available through this Internet subscription
service. Once a month, the service distributes by
electronic mail a message describing the availability of
publications and announcements of events. For
publications, the message explains how to obtain a hard
copy or how to download an electronic version from the
Internet. For additional information,about TechDirect,
contact Jeff Heimerman at (703) 603-7191 or by E-mail at
heimerman.jeff@epamail.epa.gov. TechDirect can be
accessed through the Internet at .
Programs, Partnerships, And Organizations
EPA Library Network Program. The EPA National
Library Network Program is a repository of information
from EPA's Headquarters, Regional and Field Offices,
Research Centers, and specialized laboratories throughout
the country. The Library Network provides access to its
collection through the On-line Library System (OLS), a
menu-driven database of the library's holdings. The OLS
provides users with the ability to perform online searches by
author, title, or keyword. The EPA National Library
Network Program can be accessed through the Internet at
.
Federal Remediation Technologies Roundtable (FRTR).
FRTR is an interagency working group that provides a
forum for the exchange of information regarding the
development and demonstration of innovative technologies
for the remediation of hazardous waste sites. The forum also
synthesizes the technical knowledge that Federal Agencies
have compiled and provides a more comprehensive record of
performance and cost of the technologies. Participating
agencies include DoD, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers,
the U.S. Navy, the U.S. Air Force, DOE, the U.S.
Department of the Interior, and EPA. FRTR can be accessed
through the Internet at .
Ground-Water Remediation Technologies Analysis
Center (GWRTAC). GWRTAC was established through a
cooperative agreement between the National Environmental
Technology Applications Center (NETAC) of the Center for
Hazardous Materials Research (CHMR) and EPA. The goal
of GWRTAC is to compile, analyze, and disseminate
information about innovative ground-water remediation
technologies to industry, the research community,
contractors, government, investors, and the public. The
center currently is compiling information to be included in
databases of interactive case studies and vendor information
that will be available on the GWRTAC Internet site.
GWRTAC can be accessed through the Internet at
.
Office of Research and Development (ORD). ORD, under
the Assistant Administrator, Norine E. Nopnan, Ph. D., is
the scientific and technological arm of EPA. Comprised of
three headquarters offices, three national research
laboratories and two national centers, ORD is organized
around a basic strategy of risk assessment and risk
assessment management to remediate environmental and
human health problems. ORD focuses on the advancement
of basic peer-reviewed scientific research and the
implementation of cost-effective, common sense technology.
Fundamental to ORD's mission is a partnership with the
academic scientific community through extramural research
grants and fellowships to help develop the sound
environmental research necessary to ensure effective policy
and regulatory decisions. ORD also implements such
programs as the Superfund Innovative Technology
Evaluation (SITE) program which focuses on treatment
technologies and EPA's Environmental Technology
Verification Program (ETV) which focuses on site
characterization technologies. ORD can be accessed
through the Internet at .
D-4
-------
Remediation Technologies Development Forum
(RTDF). RTDF was established by EPA to foster public-
private partnerships that would conduct laboratory and
applied research to develop, test, and evaluate innovative
remediation technologies. RTDF's home page provides
access to information about various remediation
technologies currently being designed, developed and
evaluated through seven action teams of RTDF including:
the Bioremediation of Chlorinated Solvents Consortium,
the LAS AGNA™ Partnership, the Permeable Reactive
Barriers Action Team, the Sediments Remediation Action
Team, the In-Place Inactivation and Natural Ecological
Restoration Technologies (IINERT) Soil-Metals Action
Team, the Phytoremediation of Organics Action Team,
and the In Situ Flushing Action Team. RTDF can be
accessed through the Internet at .
Superfund Innovative Technology Evaluation (SITE)
Demonstration Program. The SITE Demonstration
program was established by EPA's Office of Solid Waste
and Emergency Response and the Office of Research and
Development to encourage the development and
implementation of innovative treatment technologies for
the remediation of hazardous waste sites, and monitoring
and measurement. Through the program, technologies are
field-tested on hazardous waste materials and engineering
and cost data are garnered on the innovative technology so
that potential users can assess the technology's
applicability to a particular site. Data collected during the
field demonstrations are used to assess the performance of
the technology, the potential need for pre- and post-
processing of the waste, applicable types of wastes and
waste matrices, potential operating problems, and
approximate capital and operating costs. The collected
information is then provided in a Innovative Technology
Evaluation Report, Technology Capsule, and
Demonstration Bulletin. These reports evaluate all
available information on the technology and analyze its
overall applicability to other site characteristics, waste
types, and waste matrices. Testing procedures,
performance and cost data, and quality assurance and
quality standards also are presented. The SITE
Demonstration program can be accessed through the
Internet at .
Interstate Technology Regulatory Cooperative (ITRC).
ITRC is a state-led coalition working together with
industry an stakeholders to achieve regulatory acceptance
of environmental technologies. ITRC consists fo more
than 35 states, the District of Columbia, multiple federal
partners, industry participants, and other stakeholders,
cooperation to break down barriers and reduce compliance
costs, making it easier to use new technologies and
helping states maximize resources. Originating in 1995
from a previous initiative by the Western Governors
Association (WGA). ITRC brings together a diverse mix
of environmental experts and stakeholders from both the
public and private sectors to broaden and deepen technical
knowledge and streamline the regulation of new
environmental technologies. ITRC accomplishes its mission
in two ways: it develops guidance documents and training
courses to meet the needs of both regulators and
environmental consultants, and it works with state
representatives to ensure (hat ITRC products and services
have maximum impact among state environmental agencies
and technology users. ITRC technical work teams develop
guidance documents and both classroom and Internet-based
training courses to meet the information needs of regulatory
staff, technology vendors, and environmental consultants.
These products help state environmental agencies gain
valuable technical knowledge and develop consistent
regulatory approaches for reviewing and approving specific
technologies. State regulators lead ITRC technical teams,
which rely on broad-based participation from federal
agencies, industry, academia, and other stakeholders in
building collective knowledge and collaborative products.
ITRC can be accessed through the Internet at .
Technology Innovation Office (TIO). The U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) TIO was created
hi 1990 to act as an advocate for new technologies. TIO's
mission is to increase the application of innovative treatment
technologies to contaminated waste sites, soils, and
groundwater. To meet that mission, TIO has expanded its
focus from treatment technologies to include site
characterization technologies in order to improve the
remediation process. TIO has encouraged and relied on
cooperative ventures with other partners to accomplish many
of its goals. This effort to effectively use resources has led to
numerous joint efforts that have enhanced the state of both
remediation and site characterization. For additional
information about TIO, contact Jeff Heimerman of EPA's
TIO at (703) 603-7191. TIO can be accessed through the
Internet at
.
SITE CHARACTERIZATION TECHNOLOGIES
Electronic Sources of Information
EPA, National Exposure Research Laboratory -
Hazardous Waste Site Characterization (on CD-ROM)
(EPA 600-C-96-001). The Hazardous Waste Site
Characterization CD-ROM, developed by NERL's ESD-LV,
compiles guidance documents and related software to aid
environmental professionals in the complex,
multidisciplinary, characterizing of hazardous waste sites.
The CD-ROM is a compilation of computer programs
related to EPA's RCRA and Superfund programs that can be
printed, as well as searched by key words. Using the CD-
ROM requires a personal computer with DOS Version 3.0 or
D-5
-------
higher, 640K of Ram, and 3 MB of hard disk space. A
math co-processor is recommended but not required. The
CD-ROM can be ordered on-line through the NTIS
Internet site at .
Field Sampling and Analysis Technologies Matrix. The
Matrix, developed by participating agencies of the Federal
Remediation Technologies Roundtable (FRTR), is a
matrix and reference guide that is intended to provide
users with an understanding of the site characterization
technologies available to them and the applicability of
various technologies to their particular problem(s). The
Matrix provides a general understanding of state-of-the-
art technologies for site characterization. The Matrix and
reference guide also enhances technology information
transfer and provides much needed comparison among
competing technologies. The Matrix can be accessed
through the Internet at .
TechDirect. TechDirect, hosted by EPA's TIO, is an
information service that highlights new publications and
events of interest to environmental professionals.
Information about site characterization and remediation
technologies are available through this Internet.
subscription service. Approximately once a month, the
service distributes by electronic mail a message describing
the availability of publications and announcements of
events. For publications, the message explains how to
obtain a hard copy or how to download an electronic
version from the Internet. For additional information
about TechDirect, contact Jeff Heimermann at (703) 603-
7191 or by E-mail atheimerman.jeff@epamail.epa.gov.
TechDirect can be accessed through the Internet at
.
Programs, Partnerships, and Organizations
Consortium for Site Characterization and Technology
(CSCT). CSCT was established as one of 12 pilot projects
currently implemented.by EPA's Environmental
Technology Verification (ETV) Program. The CSCT is a
partnership program among the U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency (EPA), the U.S. Department of Defense
(DoD), and the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) that is
responsible for evaluating and verifying the performance
of innovative site characterization technologies. The
CSCT provides supportto technology developers,
evaluates and verifies data generated during
demonstrations, and develops and disseminates
information about the performance of site characterization
technologies. CSCT can be accessed through the Internet
at .
Environmental Technology Verification Program. The
ETV program seeks to provide credible performance data
on environmental technologies from independent third
parties under the auspices of EPA. It verifies the
performance of innovative technical solutions to problems
that threaten human health or the environment. Managed
by EPA's ORD, ETV was created to substantially accelerate
the entrance of new environmental technologies into
domestic and international marketplaces. It supplies buyers
of technologies, developers of those technologies, consulting
engineers, states, and EPA regions with high-quality data on
the performance of new technologies. ETV expands on past
verification efforts, such as those conducted under the SITE
program for remediation technologies. ETV currently
implements 10 pilot projects, including the Consortium for
Site Characterization Technology (CSCT). The ETV
program can be accessed through the Internet at
.
EPA Library Network Program. The EPA National
Library Network Program is a repository of information
from EPA's Headquarters, Regional and Field Offices,
Research Centers, and specialized laboratories throughout
the country. The Library Network provides access to its
collection through the On-line Library System (OLS), a
menu-driven database of the library's holdings. The OLS
provides users with the ability to perform online searches by
author, title, or keyword: The material on OLS is updated
every two weeks. The EPA National Library Network
Program can be accessed through the Internet at
. ,
Office of Research and Development (ORD). ORD, under
the Assistant Administrator, NorineE. Noonan, Ph. D., is
the scientific and technological arm of EPA.. Comprised of
three headquarters offices, three national research
laboratories and two national centers, ORD is organized
around a basic strategy of risk assessment and risk
assessment management to remediate environmental and
human health problems. ORD focuses on the advancement
of basic peer-reviewed scientific research and the
implementation of cost-effective, common sense technology.
Fundamental to ORD's mission is a partnership with the
academic scientific community through extramural research
grants and fellowships to help develop the sound
environmental research necessary to ensure effective policy
and regulatory decisions. ORD also implements such
programs as the Superfund Innovative Technology
Evaluation (SITE) program which focuses on treatment
technologies and EPA's Environmental Technology
Verification Program (ETV) which focuses on site
characterization technologies. ORD can be accessed
through the Internet at .
Superfund Innovative Technology Evaluation (SITE)
Demonstration Program. The SITE Demonstration
program was established by EPA's Office of Solid Waste
and Emergency Response and the Office of Research and
D-6
-------
Development to encourage the development and
implementation of innovative treatment technologies for
the remediation of hazardous waste sites, and monitoring
and measurement. Through the program, technologies are
field-tested on hazardous waste materials and engineering
and cost data are gathered on the innovative technology so
that potential users can assess the technology's
applicability to a particular site. Data collected during the
field demonstrations are used to assess the performance of
the technology, the potential need for pre- and post-
processing of the waste, applicable types of wastes and
waste matrices, potential operating problems, and
approximate capital and operating costs. The collected
information is then provided in a Innovative Technology
Evaluation Report, Technology Capsule, and
Demonstration Bulletin. These reports evaluate all
available information on the technology and analyze its
overall applicability to other site characteristics, waste
types, and waste matrices. Testing procedures,
performance and cost data, and quality assurance and
quality standards also are presented. The SITE
Demonstration program can be accessed through the
Internet at .
Technology Innovation Office (TIO). The U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) TIO was
created in 1990 to act as an advocate for new technologies.
TIO's mission is to increase the application of innovative
treatment technologies to contaminated waste sites, soils,
and groundwater. To Meet that mission, TIO has
expanded its focus from treatment technologies to include
site characterization technologies in order to improve the
remediation process. TIO has encouraged and relied on
cooperative ventures with other partners to accomplish
many of its goals. This effort to effectively use resources
has led to numerous joint efforts that have enhanced the
state of both remediation and site characterization. For
additional information about TIO, contact Jeff Heimerman
of EPA's TIO at (703) 603-7191. TIO can be accessed
through the Internet at
.
D-7
-------
-------
Appendix E
GLOSSARY OF REMEDIATION TECHNOLOGIES
E-l
-------
This Appendix presents definitions and brief discussions of the innovative remediation
technologies mentioned in the text of this Annual SITE Report. Established/conventional
technologies which are being replaced by these state-of-the-art, typically more cost-effective
technologies are also presented.
Innovative Remediation Technologies
BIOREMEDIATION uses microorganisms to degrade organic contaminants in either
excavated or in situ soil, sludge, and solids. The microorganisms break down contaminants by
using them as a food source or cometabolizing them with a food source. Land farming, biopiles,
composting, and slurry-phase biorerriediation are examples of ex situ applications. Bioventing is a
common form of in situ bioremediation which uses extraction wells to circulate air through the
ground, sometimes also pumping air into the ground.
CHEMICAL TREATMENT, also known as chemical reduction/oxidation, typically
converts hazardous contaminants to nonhazardous or less toxic compounds that are more stable,
less mobile, or inert. The oxidizing agents most commonly used for treatment of hazardous
contaminants in soil are ozone, hydrogen peroxide, hypochlorites, chlorine, chlorine dioxide,
potassium permanganate, and Fentons reagent (hydrogen peroxide and iron).- Cyanide oxidation
and dechlorination are examples of chemical treatment. This method may be applied in situ or ex
situ, to soils, sludges, sediments, and other solids, and may also be applied for the in situ
treatment of groundwater.
IN SITU SOIL FLUSHING: large volumes of water, at times supplemented with
surfactants, cosolvents, or treatment compounds, are applied to the soil or injected into the
groundwater to raise the water table into the contaminated soil zone. Injected water and
treatment agents are isolated within the underlying aquifer and recovered together with flushed
contaminants.
PHYTOREMEDIATION is a process that uses plants (roots, shoots, tissues, and leaves)
to remove, transfer, stabilize, or destroy contaminants in soil, sediment, and groundwater.
Phytoremediation applies to all biological, chemical, and physical processes that are influenced by
plants and that aid in cleanup of the contaminated substances. Plants can be used in site
remediation, both through the mineralization of toxic organic compounds and through the
accumulation and concentration of heavy metals and other inorganic compounds from soil into
E-2
-------
aboveground shoots. Phytoremediation may be applied in situ or ex situ, to soils, sludges,
sediments, other solids, or groundwater.
SOIL VAPOR EXTRACTION (SVE) is used to remediate the zone of soil which is
unsaturated with contaminated groundwater. A vacuum is applied to the soil to control the flow
of air and remove volatile and some semivolatile organic contaminants from the soil.
DUAL-PHASE EXTRACTION, also known as multi-phase extraction, uses a vacuum
system to remove various combinations of contaminated groundwater, separate-phase petroleum
product, and vapors from the subsurface. The system lowers the water table around the well,
exposing more of the formation. Contaminants in the newly exposed unsaturated zone are then
accessible to soil vapor extraction. Once above ground, the extracted vapors or liquid-phase
organics and ground water are separated and treated.
SOLIDIFICATION/STABILIZATION (S/S) reduces the mobility of hazardous
substances and contaminants in the environment through both physical and chemical means. The
S/S process physically binds or encloses contaminants within a stabilized mass. S/S is performed
both ex situ and in situ. Ex situ S/S requires excavation of the material to be treated, and the
resultant material must be disposed. In situ S/S uses auger/caisson systems and injector head
systems to add binders to the contaminated soil or waste without excavation, and the resultant
material is left in place.
SOLVENT EXTRACTION uses an organic solvent as an extractant to separate organic
and metal contaminants from soil. The organic solvent is mixed with contaminated soil in an
extraction unit. The extracted solution is then passed through a separator, where the contaminants
and extractant are separated from the soil. Organically bound metals may be extracted along with
the target organic contaminants.
THERMAL DESORPTION: wastes are heated so that organic contaminants and water
volatilize. Typically, a carrier gas or vacuum system transports the volatilized water and organics
to a gas treatment system.
THERMALLY ENHANCED RECOVERY uses heat to increase the volatilization rate of
organics and facilitate extraction. Volatilized contaminants are typically removed from the vadose
zone using soil vapor extraction. Specific types of these thermally enhanced recovery techniques
include Contained Recovery of Oily Waste (CROW™), radio frequency heating, conductive
heating, steam heating, in situ steam stripping, hot air injection, dynamic underground stripping, in
situ thermal desorption, and electrical resistance heating. Thermally enhanced recovery is usually
E-3
-------
applied to contaminated soil, but may also be applied to groundwater.
VITRIFICATION uses an electric current to melt contaminated soil at elevated
temperatures (1,600 to 2,000°C or 2,900 to 3,650°F). Upon cooling, the vitrification product is a
chemically stable, leach-resistant, glass and crystalline material similar to obsidian or basalt rock.
The high temperature component of the process destroys or removes organic materials.
Radionuclides and heavy metals are retained within the vitrified product. Vitrification may be
conducted in situ or ex situ.
AIR SPARGING involves the injection of air or oxygen through a contaminated aquifer.
Injected air traverses horizontally and vertically in channels through the soil column, creating an
underground stripper that removes volatile and semivolatile organic contaminants by
volatilization. Soil Vapor Extraction is usually implemented in conjunction with air sparging to
remove the generated vapor-phase contamination from the unsaturated zone. Oxygen added to
the contaminated groundwater and vadose-zone soils also can enhance biodegradation of
contaminants below and above the water table.
TREATMENT BARRIERS, also known as permeable reactive barriers (PRBs) or passive
treatment walls, are installed across the flow path of a contaminated groundwater plume, allowing
the water portion of the plume to flow through the wall. These barriers allow the passage of
water while prohibiting the movement of contaminants by employing agents within the wall such
as zero-valent metals, chelators, sorbents, and microbes. The contaminants are either degraded or
retained in a concentrated form by the. barrier material, which may need to be replaced
periodically.
Conventional Remediation Technologies
For SOIL WASHING, contaminants are absorbed onto fine soil particle surfaces are
separated from bulk soil in a water-based system on the basis of particle size. The wash water
may be augmented with a basic leaching agent, surfactant, or chelating agent or by adjustment of
pH to help remove organics and heavy metals. Soils and wash water are mixed ex situ in a tank
or other treatment unit. The wash water and various soil fractions are usually separated using
gravity settling. ;
VERTICAL ENGINEERED BARRIERS (VEBs) are subsurface barriers made of an
impermeable material designed to contain or divert groundwater. VEBs can be used to contain
E-4
-------
contaminated groundwater, divert uncontaminated groundwater from a contaminated area, or
divert contaminated groundwater from a drinking water intake or other protected resource.
INCINERATION involves the ex situ destruction of contaminated soil, sludge, and
sediment in high temperature (1,800 - 2,200°F) combustion devices. A typical hazardous waste
incinerator, diagrammed below, consists of a rotary kiln (primary combustion chamber), an
afterburner (secondary combustion chamber), connected to an air pollution control system, all of
which are controlled and monitored.
PUMP-AND-TRE AT involves removal of contaminated groundwater is from the
subsurface treatment, and discharge or reinjection, is one of the most widely used ground-water
remediation technologies. The pump and treat remediation approach is used at about three-
quarters of the Superfund sites where ground water is contaminated and at most sites where
cleanup is required by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act and state laws. It is often
associated with treatment technologies such as Air Stripping and Liquid -phase Granular
Activated Charcoal. Although the effectiveness of pump and treat systems has been called into
question after two decades of use, this approach remains a necessary component of most ground-
water remediation efforts and can be appropriate for both restoration and plume containment.
E-5
-------
-------
-------
United States
Environmental Protection
Agency
National Risk Management
Research Laboratory
Cincinnati, OH 45268
Official Business
Penalty for Private Use
$300
Please make all necessary changes on the below label,
detach or copy, and return to the address in the upper
left-hand corner.
If you do not wish to receive these reports CHECK HEREd;
detach, or copy this cover, and return to the address in the
upper left-hand corner.
PRESORTED STANDARD
POSTAGE & FEES PAID
EPA
PERMIT No. G-35
EPA/540/R-02/505
October 2002
------- |