SITE PROGRAM DEMONSTRATION
ECO LOGIC INTERNATIONAL
GAS-PHASE CHEMICAL REDUCTION PROCESS
BAY CITY, MICHIGAN
TECHNOLOGY EVALUATION REPORT
prepared for
Foster Wheeler Enviresponse, Inc.
Edison, New Jersey 08837
by
Energy and Environmental Research Corporation
Irvine, California 92718
Under Foster Wheeler Enviresponse Inc. Purchase Order Numbers
VN1-330-480000 and VN5-740-480000
EPA Contract No. 68-C9-0033
Project Officer
Gordon M. Evans
RISK REDUCTION ENGINEERING LABORATORY
U. S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
CINCINNATI, OHIO 45268
July 15, 1994
-------
NOTICE
The information in this document has been funded wholly or in part by the United States
Environmental Protection Agency under EPA Contract No. 68-C9-0033 to Foster Wheeler Enviresponse,
Inc. It has been subjected to the Agency's peer and administrative review, and it has been approved for
publication as an EPA document. Mention of trade names or commercial products does not constitute
endorsement or recommendation for use.
-------
FOREWORD
The Superfund Innovative Technology Evaluation (SITE) Program was authorized in the 1986
Superfund amendments. The program is a joint effort between EPA's Office of Research and
Development and Office Solid Waste and Emergency Response. The purpose of the program is to assist
the development of hazardous waste treatment technologies necessary to implement new cleanup
standards which require greater reliance on permanent remedies. This is accomplished through
technology demonstrations that are designed to provide engineering and cost data on selected
technologies.
The SITE Program funded a field demonstration to evaluate the Eco Logic Gas-Phase Chemical
Reduction Process developed by ELI Eco Logic International Inc. (ELI), Ontario, Canada. The
Demonstration took place at the Middleground Landfill in Bay City, Michigan using landfill waste. The
Demonstration effort assessed the technology's ability to treat hazardous wastes, based on performance
and cost. Three reports contain the results of the Demonstration: this Technology Evaluation Report,
which describes the field activities and presents the results including a performance evaluation; an
Applications Analysis Report, which interprets the data and discusses the applicability of the technology
to liquid feedstocks; and an independent Applications Analysis Report, which interprets the data and
discusses the applicability of the thermal desorption unit (TDU) to soil feedstocks. Two independent
demonstration bulletins, previously published by EPA, presented preliminary information on the reactor
and TDU tests, respectively.
Additional copies of this report may be obtained at no charge from EPA's Center for Environmental
Research Information, 26 West Martin Luther King Drive, Cincinnati, Ohio, 45268. Requests should
include the EPA document number found on the report's front cover. When this supply is exhausted,
additional copies can be purchased from the National Technical Information Service, Ravensworth EJIdg.,
Springfield, VA, 22161, (702) 487-4600. Reference copies will be available at EPA libraries in their
Hazardous Waste Collection. To inquire about the availability of other reports, call the SITE Clearinghouse
Hotline at 1-800-424-9396 or (202) 382-3000 in Washington, DC.
E. Timothy Oppelt, Director
Risk Reduction Engineering Laboratory
HI
-------
ABSTRACT
de™nstration of the ELI Eco L°9ic Gas-Phase Chemical Reduction Process was
rehable performance and cost data required to evaluate the applicability of the
took pfcce at R Middleground
hinhInelEm^°f ^/^t01! complex high-molecular-weight organic contaminants, such as polychlorinated
biphenyls (PCBs), with hydrogen-rich gas at high temperatures to produce simpler compounds such as
£±!S ZSSF " TH 8nd Wfer ^PoooThe S'TE Demons'^°n 0^ the ELI Process consisted of
L and 3 m±^. The prOC6SS !reated PCB-contaminated water, soil, and oil during test conditions 1 .
LmonSrlfi? ? ^' AicomPrehensive P3^''^ ^d analysis program was conducted during the
Demonstrat.on to characters process air emissions, residuals and effluents; rt also determined
destruction efficiency and destruction and removal efficiency of the system. uewrmmea
,PT '*** **" resMf °f lhe Demonstration. It includes a process description a
IV
-------
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Section paae
Foreword ............. . ................. . ...... . .............................. . ....................... .......................................... _ jjj
Abstract ........ •. [[[ . ............. . ................................................. jv
Figures ...................... . [[[ ............... jx
Tables ........................... . ........................ . [[[ x
Abbreviations and Symbols .................... . ...... [[[ . ................... xii
SI Conversion Factors ............................................ . ....... .................. . ............................................... xvi
Acknowledgments .................................. . [[[
1. Executive Summary [[[ . ....................................... 1.1
Site demonstration test ................................ . [[[ 1-1
Summary of results and conclusions [[[ .... 1-2
Waste characteristics and process applicability.. .......... ; ......................... . ............. . ........................ 1-2
Costs [[[ 1,4
2. Introduction [[[ . [[[ ...2-1
The Superfund Innovative Technology Evaluation Program [[[ 2-1
Site description [[[ 2-2
Objectives of the demonstration ......................................... ............................................... .........2-5
Test approach .. ........................ . [[[ .................................. 2-5
Test conditions [[[ . ................................ 2-6
Sampling and analysis [[[ . ........................... 2-6
Test chronology .......................... . [[[ 2-6
Project organization .................... . [[[ ........................ . .................. 2-7
Regulatory considerations ................................ . [[[ 2-9
Key contacts ........................ ., ................................... . [[[ 2-9
Report organization ......... .................. .... [[[ 4 ..................... 2-10
3. Process Description ... ............ ;.... ................ . .................... ..... ..................... . ..................... ,.... ..... 3-1
Pretreatment and processing requirements .............. .... ...... ........... ........ ...... . ............ .. .......... ...... .3-1
Process description ............ ...... [[[ . .................. . ................... ..3/1
-------
TABLE OF CONTENTS (CONTINUED)
3. Process Description (continued)
Scrubber system
Recirculating fan
„„
Liquid feed system
Thermal desorption unit (TDU) "..."I!..""!"!!"!.."
Materials handling "...I!."..""."."!" " 3.13
Process monitoring .""."I............. 3-14
Process operating conditions
Target and actual operating conditions.
[[[ 3-14
[[[ 3-15
4. Sampling and Analytical Procedures ............................ . ........ 4.1
Sampling locations [[[ '"' ............ .............................................. 7«
Gas streams ................. ;' .................... .................. ' [[[ 7]
Boiler fluegas(SSl 6) ........... ""..."... [[[ tt
PAH, PCB, CB/CP, and PCDD/PCDF .............. !.".".".".".'."! ............................................ 43
Volatile organics [[[ '" .................................... "' TJ
Trace metals and particulate .......... .......................... .................................... *.
HCI and HF ................................................ ZZZZV"."."" ......................................
Opacity...' .............
""
NOX,
If'
Process gas streams-SS14, SS19, SS6, SS7, SS9 . ..... '
Solid streams [[[ [[[ Jr
Liquid streams ......................... . .................... !""!""""""!" [[[ &&
Sample stream flow rate determination ........................ 1"...".....".".......".."... ................... ......... 4,7
5. Performance Evaluation.. ................ ; ......................................... _
Mass balance and organic destruction ..................... ~"'""""ZZZ'""""!!" ............................. 5.1
MBC, DE, and ORE computations and assumptions ............... ..." ........................................ 5.1
Control volumes ............................. .... .......................... '""".'". ............................. ..... 5.0
Process monitoring and sampling procedures ............ .......................... en
Sample analyses ................. ........... ........................................... To
MBC, DE, and ORE equations ........ .....".'."".".'I""." ................. ....... """ ............ " .......... " «
Detection limits ............... . ................... . ....... ..... '"'" ..... ' ......... ' ....... " ................. fr
Interpolating composite concentrations to determine run concentrations .......... ....... 5.9
"Best case" analysis ............................................ .......................... '
Mass balance, results ................. . .......... . .......... ............".."
Overall process mass balance .......... ......"."......".."." ................................. '
Major element mass balance ............................... """
Trace metals mass balance ............. . ...................... ..!!.".....". ........ ..........
-------
TABLE OF CONTENTS (CONTINUED)
SecJjoQ Page
5. Performance Evaluation (continued)
HCI emissions 532
Criteria air pollutants ZZ"Z" 534
Other air emissions 534
PCB IIZZZZZZZZZZI535
Chlorobenzenes and chlorophenols 535
PAH zzuzzzzz::::: 535
PCDD/PCDF 54!
Volatile organic compounds . 541
Trace metals . 541
NOx, SO2, and THC !."Z!!ZZ"Z"!""ZZ""""Z"!! 541
Particulatematter . '" c^
HCI z:::::::zz::::::z:::::::::::::::::::::5£
Residual streams and effluents 542
Effluent and residual streams characteristics !"Z""Z" 543
Major output streams 543
Minor output streams " 543
Reformed gas quality ZZZ............!!!!.!! 552
Process considerations Z......Z 5-53
Scale-up parameters I"!!!!!!!".."...... 553
Reactor scale-up '. "!"!!!!!! 5-53
Scrubber scale-up ""I."!""!.'.".'"!""!.' 5-54
Thermal desorption unit scale-up 554
Chemical ionization mass spectrometer validation ..." 554
System reliability .'.."I!!!!!!."!"! 556
Waste feed rate... ZZZZ""!"!!""!!!" 556
Availability .......Z............"!!! 5-57
Destruction efficiency 5-58
Key cost assumptions Z!"Z"!"!.'!."! 5-58
Permit conditions [ " g^g
TSCA permit ' 5gg
Michigan Department of Natural Resources permit !.".".".. 560
6. Quality Assurance/Quality Control..... ; fr1
QA/QC definitions , .....ZZ.l..!.".Z..!!!!!!!!!l!!!."!! 6-1
Quality assurance objectives ZZ.""'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.""" 6-1
Precision, accuracy, and completeness results ZZ.""".'.'".'.".'.'.'.'." 6-2
Data presentation 6-2
Boiler flue gas results ge
voc z:zzzzzzzz::::::z:::::::::::::::::::::&6
Trace metals „ ^Q
Particulate matter "."..."""Z."!!". 66
Waste water, heat exchanger residue, reactor grit, and scrubber sludge results 6-8
Trace metals ' g^
Chlorophenols
sufur zzzzzzzzzzrzzz";;;:;""""
Perchloroethylene and VOCs
PAH • (5-10
vii
-------
TABLE OF CONTENTS (CONTINUED)
Section Page
6. Quality Assurance/Quality Control (continued)
PCBs ; ^
Waste oil, contaminated soil, and treated soil results 6-11
PCBs
vocs...... .; ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::i:;::::;:;::::::::;;:;:i
Sulfur
Trace Metals g.14
Scrubber decant water results "!!".".'"!"."" 6-14
Rue gas sampling quality assurance "!.".."!!""!! 6-14
Analytical quality assurance .I.!!!."!!."."!"!."." 6-16
Additional quality control checks j 6-16
Audit results ™"~™"™"""l"" 6-16
Deviations to the QAPP I!'""'!""""""""!!!""""""""!"" 6-19
QA organization "/............".I...!!!!!! 6-23
Appendices
1. Process operation ^.1
2. Summary of results , ."!!".""."!!.'""!.'""" ! A2-1
3. Data evaluation !!"!!.'."."!!!."!!!'.!.' A3-1
4. Internal QA/QC results !."."."."."!.'"!!!."!."."."!!."!".".".""!! A4-1
5. External audit reports "/...........!.!!!." A5-1
VIII
-------
FIGURES
Number. Page
2-1 Location of the landfill 2-3
2-2 Demonstration site !!!!."!!!l"."!..".."!..."....";'^.'l'." 2-4
2-3 Project organization and responsibilities. .......".""!.""!.."!!!...."."... 2-8
3-1 Principal reactions of the ELI Gas-Phase Chemical Reduction Process ...."."""...........".".. 3-2
3-2 Process flow diagram of Eco Logic Gas-Phase Chemical Reduction Process ....!!!...........!! 33
33 ELI gas-phase chemical reduction reactor .....' 3^5
34 Process control monitoring locations \ 3^
4-1 sampling locations "!!.."!!!!.".!!"!!!!.!!..!"!!!!."!!....""!!."'! 4-2
5-1 Control volumes and sampling locations for complete system mass balance ............."! 5-3
5-2 Control volumes and sampling locations for reactor mass balance I""....".".".. &4
53 Reactor carbon and chlorine mass balance and partitioning 5-15
5-4 PCB congener distributions (detected data only) "I.".".""...! 5-25
5* Dioxin congener distributions (detected data only) ..""..""."""."""".""!..""...".. 5-29
&6 Furan congener distributions (detected data only) .-..!!""."."!!."! 530
5-7 PIC trends during initial test compared to later tests ..".." 533
5-8 Comparison of CIMS response to VOST measurements for chtorobenzene.."."."."...."."...". 565
6-1 QA organization
IX
-------
TABLES
Number
1-1 Summary of demonstration objectives and results 1_3
2-1 Test chronology ._ _ 2-7
3-1 Process control monitoring stations..... 37
3-2 Eco Logic SITE demonstration chronology .............Ts-IO
33 Condition 1 summary of process operation ...I.."....".".. 3-16
34 Condition 2 summary of process operation ]. 3_17
36 Condition 3 summary of process operation 3.13
3« Comparison of target and actual waste feed conditions !!!""...".." 3-19
4-1 Sampling locations """!!!."!"!.'"""""" 4-1
4-2 Gas stream sampling and analytical methods ."."!!.""!."....."........."."..."!!!."!....... 4-3
4-3 Solids sampling and analytical methods ""!..""."!! 46
4-4 Liquids sampling and analytical methods !!""rZ"""llll!!"^""" 4-7
5-1 Mass balance, ORE, and DE sample collection and analysis sii^aryT!!"ZZr.ZZZl" 55
5-2 Mass balance analysis summary.... 5^
5<3 Process and major element mass balance summary ...........!! 5-12
&4 Trace metal mass balance summary ...."!.!........... 5-13
5-5 Comparison of earth crust element distribution to ELI reduction process stream element
distributions c.-|g
5-6 Summary of PCB, PCE, HCB, and PCDD/PCDFd^nJction'\\\\\^\\\\\\\\\\\"!!!!!!!!!!.'.'.".'.'.'.'." 5-20
5-7 Destruction of PCB - system evaluation 5.22
5-8 Destruction of PCE and HCB - system evaluation .............."^ 5-26
5-9 Destruction of dioxins and furans - system evaluation !.!...".." 5-28
5-10 Products of incomplete combustion at stack (SS16) ."."1..."!....".!!."!!!!!."!!."."!!..".".."...".... 5<31
5-11 Hydrogen chloride emission summary 534
5-12 Criteria air pollutants !!!.""....."".".".!."."."."!!."."!..".."! &35
5-13 SS16-boiler stack gas results summary... ..."""."...".."!!!!..."!..."".." 5-36
5-14 Summary of selected regulatory emissions limits ..............I! 5-39
5-15 Yield of process residuals and effluents per unit of waste feed .........."'"... 542
5-16 Characterization of process residuals and effluents !..!!!!!.".".""!."!!!"!..."... 544
5-17 Comparison of reformed gas quality to other gaseous fuels "."!.."..."..."!."....!!."!.."
5-18 Trace organic compounds detected in reformed gas
5-19 ELI CIMS validation .....l"."I!r.."!""1
5-20 Waste feed inputs '
5-21 Unit availability !.'"!.'.'!"."."".".".".'.'."""."!""""!!!!.'
5-22 Responsiveness to TSCA permit "..""!..""!......".....".".."...."..."."!...".. 5^0
5-23 Michigan Department of Natural Resources air permit conditions 5^1
6-1 Quality assurance objectives for ELI SITE demonstration '""^"'"''''""J^"^'"" 6-3
6-2 Approach for calculation of precision and accuracy '^'"^"J"""^""^". 64
&3 Summary of precision, accuracy, and completeness achieved for boiler flue gas samples ......... 6-7
64 Summary of precision, accuracy, and completeness achieved for waste water, heat
exchanger residue, reactor grit, and scrubber sludge 6-9
-------
TABLES (CONTINUED)
Number •
Page
6-5 Summary of precision, accuracy, and completeness for waste oil 6-12
6-6 Sumnrary of precision, accuracy, and completeness for contaminated and treated soil 6-13
6-7 Summary of precision, accuracy, and completeness for scrubber decant water 6-15
6-8 Field blank results for multiple metals trains g.17
69 Summary of quality control checks (&.18
6-10 Summary of technical system audits 15-20
6-11 Summary of performance evaluation audits
6-12 Modifications to EPA Method 26 - HCI train '. .. .''
xi
-------
ABBREVIATIONS AND SYMBOLS
Hfl
AAR
ACCUM
acf
acm
Ag
ALR
As
ASTM
B
B.H.
Ba
Be
BOR
BQL
Btu
C
C2CI4
C2H4
C6CI6
C6H6
Ca(OH)2
CAA
CARB
CB
CD
CCI4
Cd
CEL
GEM
CERCLA
cf
cfm
CFR
CH4
C1MS
Cl
on
en*
microgram
percent
less than; average analytical results includes both detected and non-detected data
greater than; average analytical results includes data above linear range of analyzer
Applications Analysis Report
accumulative stream
actual cubic feet
actual cubic meters '
silver
above linear range
arsenic
American Society for Testing and Materials
lab method blank contamination
back half (components of sampling train downstream of filter)
barium
beryllium
beginning of run
below quant'rtation limit
British thermal unit
carbon
perchloroethylene; also tetrachloroethylene or tetrachloroethene
ethylene
hexachlorobenzene
benzene
calcium hydroxide (lime)
Clean Air Act
California Air Resources Board
chtorobenzenes
cubic centimeter
carbon tetrachloride
cadmium
Calscience Environmental Laboratory Inc.
continuous emissions monitoring
Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act
cubic foot
cubic feet per minute
Code of Federal Regulations
methane
chemical ionization mass spectrometer
chlorine
centimeter
square centimeter
XII
-------
ABBREVIATIONS AND SYMBOLS (CONTINUED)
CO
CO2
CP
Cr
Cr(VI)
Cu
CWA
DE
Dl
DNAPL
DOT
dP
ORE
dscf
dscm
Dup
E
EER
ELI
EMPC
EOR
EPA
excl.
F
F.H.
FB
FID
FPD
FS
ft
ft2
ft3
FWEI
9
gal
GC
GF-AAS
gpm
gr
H
H2
H2S04
HCB
HCI
Hg
HpCDD
HpCDF
carbon monoxide ,
carbon dioxide
chlorophenols
chromium
hexavalent chromium
copper CV-AAScold vapor atomic absorption spectroscopy
Clean Water Act
destruction efficiency
deionized
dense nonaqueous-phase liquid
Department of Transportation
differential pressure (e.g., velocity head)
destruction and removal efficiency
dry standard cubic feet at 20°C (68°F) and 760 mm Hg (29.92 in. Hg)
dry standard cubic meters at 20°C (68°F) and 760 mm Hg (29.92 in. Hg)
duplicate
estimated maximum possible concentration
Energy and Environmental Research Corporation
ELI Eco Logic International, Incorporated
estimated maximum possible concentration
end of run
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
excluding
fluorine; or as flag meaning laboratory blank was 20 percent of measured value or greater
(result not statistically significant)
front half (filter and upstream components of sampling train)
field blank
flame ionization detector
flame photometric detector
field spike
feet
square foot
cubic foot
Foster Wheeler Enviresponse Incorporated
gram ~
gallon
gas chromatography
graphite furnace atomic absorption spectroscopy
gallons per minute
grains
hydrogen (atomic)
hydrogen (molecular)
sulfuricacid
hexachlorobenzene
hydrogen chloride
mercury
heptachlorodibenzodioxin
heptachlorodibenzofuran
XIII
-------
ABBREVIATIONS AND SYMBOLS (CONTINUED)
hr hour
H R G C high resolution gas chromatography
H R M S high resolution mass spectrometry
HSL hazardous substances list HWhazardous waste
HxCDD hexachlorodibenzodioxin
HxCDF hexachlorodibenzofuran
1C ion chromatography
ICAP inductively coupled argon plasma spectroscopy
IN input stream
in. WC inches of water column (pressure)in.inch
in2 square inch
incl. including
INT ., interferences prevented quantification of substance
kg kilogram
KMnO4 potassium permanganate
KW kilowatt
L liter
Ib pound
Ibm pound mass
LC laboratory control
LCS laboratory control spike
LCSD laboratory control spike duplicate
m meter
m2 square meter
m3 cubic meter
M B C mass balance closure
MDNR Michigan Department of Natural Resources
mg milligram
MGD million gallons per day
min minute
Mn manganese
MS matrix spike (in context of QA)
MS mass spectrometry (in context of analytical methods)
MS monitoring station (in context of process monitoring)
MSD matrix spike duplicate
MW molecular weight
n neglected
N normality of solution
N A not available or not analyzed
NAAQS National Ambient Air Quality Standards
N a O H sodium hydroxide (caustic soda)
N C could not be calculated
ND not detected
NDIR non-dispersive infrared
NDUV non-dispersive ultraviolet
ng nanogram
Ni nickel
nn not needed for computations
XIV
-------
ABBREVIATIONS AND SYMBOLS (CONTINUED)
NOX
NPDES
NPL
NS
O
O&M
02
OCDD
OCDF
ORD
OSHA
OSWER
OUT
P
PAH
Pb
PCB
PCDD
PCDF
PCE
PEA
PeCDD
PeCDF
PH
PIC
PIR
POHC
POTW
ppb
PPE
ppm
ppmv
ppmw
PSD
psi
psig
QA
QAPP
QC
QS
R&D
RCRA
RF
RPD
RREL
RSD
S
SARA
oxides of nitrogen (NO + NO2)
National Pollution Discharge Elimination System
National Priorities List
not spiked
oxygen (atomic)
operating and maintenance
oxygen (molecular)
octachlorodibenzodioxin
octachlorodibenzofuran
EPA Office of Research and Development
Occupational Safety and Health Act
EPA Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response
output stream
phosphorus
polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon
lead
polychlorinated biphenyl
potychlorinated dibenzo[p]dioxins
polychlorinated dibenzofurans
perchloroethylene; also tetrachloroethylene or tetrachloroethene
performance evaluation audit
pentachlorodibenzodioxin
pentachlorodibenzofuran
negative log of hydrogen ion concentration in solution - a measure of acidity/alkalinity
product of incomplete combustion
product of incomplete reduction
principal organic hazardous constituent
publicity owned treatment works
parts per billion
personnel protection equipment
parts per million
parts per million by volume
parts per million by weight
prevention of significant deterioration
pounds per square inch
pounds per square inch, gage
quality assurance
quality assurance project plan QAPjP quality assurance project plan
quality control
quantified with secondary ion
research and development
resource conservation and recovery act
radio frequency
relative percent difference
Risk Reduction Engineering Laboratory
relative standard deviation
sulfur
Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization Act
xv
-------
ABBREVIATIONS AND SYMBOLS (CONTINUED)
SAT data estimated based on saturated instrument response
Sb antimony
scf standard cubic foot at 20°C (68°F) and 760 mm Hg (29.92 in. Hg)
scfm standard cubic feet per minute at 20°C (68°F) and 760 mm Hg (29.92 in. Hg)
son standard cubic meter at 20°C (68°F) and 760 mm Hg (29.92 in. Hg)
Se selenium
sec second
SI International System of Units (Le Systeme International d Unites)
SITE Superfund Innovative Technology Evaluation Program
sL standard liter
Sn tin
SO2 sulfur dioxide
S PCC system performance check compound
SS sampling station
S S H O site safety and health officer
stdev standard deviation
Surr surrogate
SVOC semivolatile organic compound
TCDD tetrachlorodibenzodioxin
TCDF tetrachlorodibenzofuran
TCLP Toxicity Characteristic Leachate Procedure
TCT Twin City Testing Inc.
TDU thermal desorption unit
TER Technology Evaluation Report
THC total hydrocarbons
Tl thallium
TLI Triangle Laboratories, Inc.
TSA technical systems audit
TSCA Toxic Substances Control Act
TSD treatment, storage, and disposal
TSR technical system review
U.S. United States
VOC volatile organic compounds
vol. % percent, volume basis
VOST volatile organic sampling train
wt. % percent, weight basis
x analyzed
yd yard
Zn zinc
C degrees centigrade
F degrees Fahrenheit
o
XVI
-------
SI CONVERSION FACTORS
Multiply English (US^units by Factor to get Metric (B\) Units
Area:
Row Rate:
Length:
Mass:
Volume:
Temperature:
Concentration:
Pressure:
Heating value:
1ft2
1in2
1 gal/min
1 gal/min
1 MGD
1ft
1 Ib
1lb
1fts
1ft3
1gal
1 gal
°F-32
1 gr/fts
1 gr/gal
1 Tb/fts
1 Ib/in2
1 Ib/in2
Btu/lb
Btu/scf
0.0929
6.452
6.31x10-5
0.0631
43.81
0.3048
2.54
453.59
0.45359
28.316
0.028317
3.785
0.003785
0.55556
22884
0.0171
16.03
0.07031
6894.8
2326
37260
cms
m3/s
Us
Us
m
cm
L
m3
L
g/m3
g/L
9/L
kg/cm2
Newton/m2
Joules/kg
Joules/scm
XVII
-------
This page intentionally left blank
XVIII
-------
SECTION 1
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
SITE DEMONSTRATION TEST
Under the auspices of the Superfund Innovative Technology Evaluation (SITE) Program, the U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) conducted a field demonstration to develop reliable performance
and cost data for the Eco Logic Gas-Phase Chemical Reduction Process developed by ELI Eco Logic
International Inc. (ELI), Ontario, Canada. The demonstration was conducted in cooperation with the City
of Bay City, Michigan, Environment Canada, and the Ontario (Canada) Ministry of the Environment and
Energy. The data coHected from the SITE Demonstration will provide the basis for decisions regarding
the applicability of the process for remediation of sites. Specifically, the information from this
demonstration can be used for the following purposes:
• Characterize the efficiency of the process;
• Evaluate potential uses of the process in remedial actions;
• Identify pretreatment requirements;
• Isolate operational problems and determine potential solutions;
• Characterize process residues;
• Identify any need for secondary treatment;
• Develop operating costs for the pilot scale unit and for a full commercial unit;
• Identify pertinent government policy and regulatory requirements;
• Provide a basis for process comparison to competitive technologies.
The Demonstration was conducted at the Middlegrourid Landfill in Bay City, Michigan. The site had
been an active commercial and industrial landfill until 1984. when it was closed and capped. Buried
contaminants are migrating through the island, threatening to pollute the Saginaw River that bounds the
landfill.
A pilot-scale process demonstration unit was erected at the site. The main components of the pilot-
scale demonstration unit are an electrically-heated reactor, a scrubber system, an auxiliary boiler, and a
1-1
-------
waste preheating vessel. Ancillary equipment included feed systems for the materials to be treated and
for other process consumables, fans, compressors, and process controls. In addition, a separate thermal
desorption unit (TDU) was added for one test condition. The electrically-heated reactor, where destruction
of organic compounds occurs in a reducing hydrogen atmosphere, is the heart of the system. The
scrubber removes acid gases such as hydrogen chloride and paniculate matter from the reactor products.
The gaseous reactor products are stored for future use or burned in the auxiliary boiler.
The Demonstration took place in October and December 1992; ft lasted a total of 45 days. The unit
processed a total of 2,632 kg (713 gal) of contaminated water, 180 kg (48 gal) of oil and 963 kg of soil
during this period. The test program evaluated three process conditions:
• Treatment of oil and water containing polychtorinated biphenyls (PCBs) to simulate contaminated
water (Condition 1);
• Treatment of soil containing PCBs (Condition 2 - a proof of concept test);
• Treatment of oil containing high levels of PCBs (Condition 3).
Three test runs were performed under Conditions 1 and 3. Two test runs were performed under
Condition 2. Samples of the feed materials and all key gaseous, solid, and liquid streams were collected
and analyzed for each run. For each test run, a surrogate tracer compound was added to the system to
enable determination of destruction efficiency (DE). An additional 72-hour test provided equipment
reliability information.
SUMMARY OF RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS
The Demonstration confirmed the feasibility of the process for treatment of materials contaminated
with PCBs and other organic compounds in an environmentally acceptable manner. The test program
results are compared to the primary and secondary objectives of the SITE Demonstration in Table 1-1.
WASTE CHARACTERISTICS AND PROCESS APPLICABILITY
Three different contaminated feed materials recovered from the site were processed in this
Demonstration: waste water, oil, and soil.. The first test condition was designed to simulate treatment of
waste water contaminated with tow levels of PCBs. Because the concentration of PCBs in the waste
1-2
-------
TABLE 1-1. SUMMARY OF DEMONSTRATION OBJECTIVES AND RESULTS
~~~ Objective
Demonstrate at least 99.9999 percent (6 nines)
destruction and removal efficiency (ORE) of PCBs
for each test run
Demonstrate at least 99.99 percent (4 nines) DE
for tracer compounds added to the waste for each
test condition
Ensure that no polychlorinated dibenzo[p]dioxins
and dibenzofurans (PCDD/PCDR are formed
Characterize products of incomplete combustion
(PICs) emissions
Characterize hydrogen chloride (HCI) emissions
Document compliance with Michigan Department of
Natural Resources (MDNR) air permit conditions
Characterize criteria air pollutant emissions
Document compliance with Toxic Substances
Control Act (TSCA) permit requirements
Validate key cost assumptions used to process
economic analyses
Characterize effluents and residual streams relative
to disposal requirements
Determine the suitability of the reformed gases for
reuse/resale
Demonstrate system reliability
Develop a system mass balance, including metals
Characterize critical process scale-up parameters
Validate the chemical ionization mass spectrometer
(CIMS)
Document system operation during test runs
Result
Achieved for all runs, except Condition 2 Run 2
(sample contamination or PCBs in the auxiliary
boiler combustion air may have caused low ORE
for this run)
Achieved for all runs, except for Condition 2 Run 1
(due to poor desorption efficiency rather than
poor destruction within the reactor)
Net destruction of PCDD/PCDF contained in the
feed was demonstrated
Characterized PICs in the air emissions
Emissions of HCI at the stack were low compared
to permit and typical regulatory limits
Achieved the MDNR air permit conditions, except
for allowable stack concentrations of benzene
during Condition 1 and Condition 3 and
chtorobenzene emissions (due to high detection
limits) during Condition 2
Air emissions of nitrogen oxides (NOx), sulfur
dioxide (SOg), and paniculate matter were tow
compared to permit and typical regulatory limits
Achieved TSCA permit conditions for Condition 1
and Condition 3 (TSCA permit conditions did not
apply to Condition 2)
Identified key cost factors and calculations
Characterized the residual streams for disposal
Generated a tow Btu gas suitable for use as a fuel
Demonstrated a pilot-scale system on-line capacity
factor of 50 percent
Achieved good total mass balance closure and
generally good elemental mass balance closure
Documented key parameters likely to be used in
scale-up of the pilot-scale system
Identified that the CIMS may reflect data trends
which could be useful for process control
Documented process operating conditions and
correlated them with the test results
water recovered from the site was very tow (below detection limits of approximately 0.02 ppm), waste oil
was co-injected into the process to achieve an equivalent PCB concentration in the total feed of 3,757
ppm (mean of three runs, mono- through deca- congeners). The second test condition evaluated the
ability to treat contaminated soil containing 627 ppm PCBs (mean of two runs, mono- through deca-
congeners). Because water is a process feedstock, relatively small amounts of clean water also were
1-3
-------
injected to the system. In the third test condition, waste oil containing 25.4 percent PCBs (mono- through
deca- congeners) was fed to the process.
Test results show that the process met nearly all performance goals when feeding the waste water
and oil. Thus the suitability of this process for treating these liquid wastes was demonstrated. For tests
with soil feed/the pilot-scale system was augmented with a TDU. The TDU did not perform to design
specifications. As a proof-of-concept test, the TDU did demonstrate desorption efficiencies of 99
percent for PCBs, and in the TDU's second test, 99.99 percent for the hexachlorobenzene tracer
compound. The balance of the system did meet performance goals in operation with the TDU. Based
on these tests, further development of the TDU is required before treatment of contaminated soil should
be considered.
COSTS
Process operating parameters necessary for an economic analysis of the system were documented
during the demonstration:
• Process feed rates (water, soil, oil);
• Utilities (electricity);
• Consumables (hydrogen, propane, nitrogen, scrubber caustic, etc.);
• Residuals yields (scrubber effluent, waste water, etc.);
• Disposal requirements (residuals characteristics);
• Process operating labor;
• Availability.
The results of the economic evaluation are presented in the Applications Analysis Reports.
-------
SECTION 2
INTRODUCTION
THE SUPERFUND INNOVATIVE TECHNOLOGY EVALUATION PROGRAM
In 1986, the EPA's Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response (OSWER) and Office of
Research and Development (ORD) established the SITE Program to promote the development and use
of innovative technologies to clean up Superfund sites across the country. Now in its seventh year, the
SITE Program is helping to provide the treatment technologies necessary to implement new federal and
state cleanup standards aimed at permanent remedies. The SITE Program is composed of three
elements: the Demonstration Program, the Emerging Technologies Program, and an Analytical Methods
Development Program.
The major focus has been on the Demonstration Program, which is designed to provide engineering
and cost data on selected technologies. EPA and developers participating in the program share the cost
of the demonstration. Developers are responsible for demonstrating their innovative systems at chosen
sites, usually Superfund sites. EPA is responsible for sampling, analyzing, and evaluating all test results.
The result is an assessment of the technology's performance that can be used in conjunction with other
data to select the most appropriate technologies for the cleanup of Superfund and other contaminated
sites.
Developers of innovative technologies apply to the Demonstration Program by responding to EPA's
annual solicitation. EPA also accepts proposals at any time when a developer has scheduled a treatment
project with Superfund waste. To qualify for the program, a new technology must be at the pilot-scale or
full-scale stage of development and offer some advantage over existing technologies. Mobile
technologies are of particular interest.
Once the EPA has accepted a proposal, the EPA and the developer work with the EPA regional
offices and state agencies to identify a site containing waste suitable for testing the capabilities of the
technology. EPA then prepares a detailed sampling and analysis plan designed to thoroughly evaluate
the technology and to ensure that the resulting data are reliable. The duration of a demonstration varies
2-1 _ .-
-------
from a few days to several months depending on the type of process and quantity of waste needed to
assess the technology.
On completion of the demonstration, EPA prepares a Technology Evaluation Report (TER) and an
Applications Analysis Report (AAR). The TER compiles and summarizes the results of the SITE
demonstration including the vendor's design and test data, provides a detailed technology description,
describes the site and waste used for the demonstration, and presents the sampling and analysis
protocols used during the test. The report discusses the factors that have a major impact on costs and
performance, such as site and waste characteristics. The AAR more briefly explains the technology and
the results obtained. The report strives to evaluate the application of the vendor's technology to other
sites and other wastes. Ultimately, the TER and the AAR provide an analysis of the technology's overall
applicability to Superfund problems.
SITE DESCRIPTION
The Middleground Landfill is situated on the westward margin of Middleground Island in the Saginaw
River within the corporate limits of Bay City, Michigan (Rgures 2-1 and 2-2). It is bounded by Cass Road on
the south, the Saginaw River on the West, Evergreen Drive on the east, and is 1,500 ft north of Cass Ave.
The landfill was closed in 1984.
A remedial investigation conducted by ELI between November 1990 and April 1991, prior to the
current project, found elevated levels of trichloroethene, PCBs, 1,2-dichloroethene, methylene chloride,
toluene, and ethylbenzene in the liquid samples collected in the area of Monitoring Well 8 at the
Middleground Landfill 1. The liquid contained lesser concentrations of benzidine, benzene, vinyl
cnlorobenzenes, polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), Lindane, Dieldrin, Chlordane, and DDT
metabolites. The soil removed during well drilling and excavation was contaminated with up to 1,000 ppm
PCB. The groundwater fraction of the liquid removed during drilling contained 5,900 ppm of methylene
chloride and was mildly contaminated with other typical leachate contaminants. The other fraction of the
liquid waste was a dense, nonaqueous phase liquid (DNAPL) that was present as an immiscible liquid
phase. ELI's analysis of the DNAPL from this early study indicated a PCB content of approximately 39
percent.
"Phase II Remedial Investigation Middle Ground Landfill, Bay City, Michigan." prepared for the City of
Bay City, Michigan, by ELI Eco Logic International, Inc., Rockwood, Ontario, Canada (1991).
2-2
-------
Saginaw Bay
Crow Island
State Game
Area
Miles
MIDDLEGROUND
LANDFILL
James
Clemens
Airport
Figure 2-1. Location of the landfill.
2-3
-------
D
a
a
p
X
/
Y
Approximate Boundary of Mound
Eco Logic
Demonstration
Site
o so 100 200
(feet)
Figure 2-2. Demonstration site.
-------
OBJECTIVES OF THE DEMONSTRATION
The objectives of the Demonstration were divided into primary and secondary objectives. The
primary objectives of the Demonstration were as follows:
• Demonstrate at least 99.9999 percent ORE for PCBs for each test run.
• Demonstrate at least 99.99 percent DE for tracer compounds added to the waste for each test
condition.
• Ensure that no dioxins or furans were formed.
• Characterize PIC emissions.
The secondary objectives of the demonstration were as follows:
• Characterize HCI emissions.
• Document compliance with MDNR air permit conditions.
• Characterize criteria air pollutant emissions.
• Document compliance with TSCA permit requirements.
• Validate key cost assumptions used to process economic analyses.
• Characterize effluents and residual streams relative to disposal requirements.
• Determine the suitability of the reformed gases for reuse/resale.
• Demonstrate system reliability.
• Develop a system mass balance, including metals.
• Characterize critical process scale-up parameters.
• Validate the CIMS.
• Document system operation during test runs.
TEST APPROACH
Test Conditions
The goal of the Demonstration was to determine if the ELI Gas-Phase Chemical Reduction Process
can handle the complex waste matrices encountered in large scale remediation programs. To achieve this
goal, the ELI process was demonstrated under three different test conditions distinguished by the
principal waste matrix: waste water, site soil, and waste oil. Each of these three conditions also differed
by the PCB concentrations in the waste feed. Condition 1 treated 2,058 kg (557 gal) of waste water with
' • ' ' 2-5 " '
-------
co-injection of DNAPL containing 23.8 percent PCBs to achieve an equivalent PCB concentration in the
total waste feed of 3,757 ppm (mean of three runs, mono- through deca- congeners). Condition 2 treated
963 kg of soil contaminated with 627 ppm of PCBs (mean of two runs, mono- through deca- congeners).
Condition 3 treated 150 kg (40 gal) of DNAPL containing 25.4 percent of PCBs.
Target process operating conditions were established prior to the test based on information
provided by ELI. ELI based their selection of target operating conditions on/^previous experience
during a demonstration of the process treating harbor sediment.
Surrogate compounds were added to the feed to enable the DE of the process to be quantified.
For Conditions 1 and 3, perchloroethylene (PCE), also known as tetrachloroethylene or tetrachloroethene,
was metered separately into the process. Hexachtorobenzene (HCB), a solid material, was added to
the soil during Condition 2 tests. These compounds were selected based on their thermal stability
characteristics2, which are considered high relative to actual feed contaminants.
Sampling and Analysis
A detailed plan was developed prior to the test according to EPA guidelines for Category II Quality
Assurance Project Plans. The plan contains detailed descriptions of the sampling and analysis procedures
and process data collection procedures to be employed. EPA test methods were applied for all
samples where such methods exist. All key input and output streams as well as selected intermediate
streams were sampled and analyzed for physical properties (flow rate, density, moisture, etc.); PCBs,
PCDD/PCDF, PAHs; chlorobenzenes and chlorophenols (CB/CP); volatile organic compounds (VOC); 13
trace metals; HCI; O2, CO2, CO, SO2, NOX, total hydrocarbons; and other selected compounds.
Samples were collected from 19 different solid, liquid, and gaseous process streams during the test
program.
Tost Chronology
The Demonstration chronology is summarized in Table 2-1. In preparation for the Demonstration, ELI
first processed clean water to adjust the system to peak performance, followed by a tracer material
pretest to adjust the sampling equipment and sampling trains. Beginning on October 12, 1992,
operations at test conditions 1 and 3 were conducted, continuing over the next 17 days. Operations at
2 Taylor, P.M., B. Dellinger, and C.C. Lee, "Development of a Thermal Stability Based Ranking of
Hazardous Organic Compound Incinerabilfty," Environ. Sci. Technol., Vol 24, No. 3 (1990).
2-6
-------
TABLE 2-1. TEST CHRONOLOGY
Condition
Preliminaries
1- waste water
3 - waste oil
2 - site soils
Run No.
1
1
2
2
3
3
1
1
2
2
3
3
1
1
2
2
Event
Setup
Tracer pretest
Test
Process sample recovery
Test
Process sample recovery
Test
Process sample recovery
Compression
Stack test, sample recovery
Compression, stack test
Process sample recovery
Compression, stack test
Process sample recovery
Test
Process sample recovery
Test
Process sample recovery
72-hour performance evaluation
Date (1992)
September 28
October 7
October 12
October 13
October 17
October 18
October 19
October 20
October 23
October 24
October 26
October 27
October 28
October 29
December 1
December 2
December 7
December 8
December 5-8
test Condition 2 were conducted during the first week of December, 1992. One test run was conducted
on each test day. All solid and liquid samples were collected simultaneously with gas-phase sampling, to
the extent possible. Due to the complexity and number of samples taken during the program, sample
collection was performed on alternating days to allow complete sample recovery on the day following
each test. This also allowed time to resolve any process operation problems prior to the next test run.
Gaseous samples were recovered on the day they were collected.
During test Condition 3, the rate of reformed gas production was greater than the rate at which it could
be fed safely to the auxiliary boiler. Therefore, the reformed gas was compressed and stored during
waste processing. After waste processing, the compressed gas was fed from the storage tank to the
auxijiary boiler. Flue gas samples from the auxiliary boiler stack were collected during this period.
PROJECT ORGANIZATION
Figure 2-3 illustrates the organization and responsibilities of each party for the key project activities.
The principal organizations involved in the SITE activities were:
• U. S. Environmental Protection Agency;
2-7
-------
Gordon Evans
Project Officer
Environment Canada
Ed Golson
Project Coordinator
Ann Kern
External QA Coordinator
Kelvin Campbell
Project Manager
Gerard Sudell
Project Manager
Craig McEwen
Process Coordinator
Glenn England
Project Manager
William Obera
Internal QA Coordinator
Twin City Testing
Kan Cook
Project Manager
Joel Pitman
Project Manager
Hani Karam
Project Manager
Activity
Site preparation
Permits
Equipment
Demonstration plan
Safety and Health Plan
SSHO
S&Aplan
QAPP
QAA3C
QA/QC audit
Demonstration
Pro-test drum sampling
Site management
Sampling and analysis
CEM
CIMS
Ambient air monitoring
Post demonstration
Waste disposal
Reports
Fact sheet
TER
AAR
Video
EPA
A
S
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
S
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
FWEI
S
C
C
D
D
R
Co
R
Co
C
C
Co
Co
Co
Co
Co
A
C
S
D
C
D
D
ELI
C
C
S
C
C
R
C
R
C
R
S
S
S
S
S
S
Co
C
C
C
C
C
C
EER
C
R
C
C
C
R
D
D
S
R
C
R
C
S
S
C
S
C
C
C
D
R
C
Bay City
C
C
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
C
R
R
R
R
R
C
R
R
R
R
R
R
A-Approve
C-Contrlbute
Co-Consolidate/coordlnate
D-Develop
R-Review
S-Suppty
Figure 2-3. Project organization and responsibilities.
-------
• City of Bay City, Michigan;
• Foster Wheeler Enviresponse, Inc. (FWEI);
• Eco Logic International Inc. (ELI);
• Energy and Environmental Research Corporation (EER).
EPA had the overall responsibility for conducting the sampling and analysis, test evaluation and
program quality assurance. The City of Bay City provided access to the site and support in coordinating
, mobilization, demobilization and site preparation activities. FWEI was the prime contractor to EPA with
responsibility for demonstration planning, reporting, and site preparation activities. ELI was responsible
for process design, installing and operating the demonstration unit, process monitoring, and extraction of
feed materials from the site. ELI received support from Environment Canada and the Ontario Ministry of
the Environment and Energy for its responsibilities during the Demonstration. Their participation was
coordinated through Environment Canada, EER was responsible for sampling and analysis activities,
including Quality Assurance Project Plan preparation, sample collection and analysis, data reduction and
analysis, and reporting. Sample analysis was subcontracted by EER to various laboratories.
REGULATORY CONSIDERATIONS
The Middleground Landfill is owned by the City of Bay City. It is not a National Priority List (NPL)
she. Consequently, Bay City and ELI entered into an agreement to test the ELI process at the landfill
under the auspices of the SITE Program. In addition, the Michigan Department of Natural Resources
(MDNR) maintained oversight of the program. Regulatory permits necessary to perform the
Demonstration included the following:
• MDNR air permit to allow processing of PCB-contaminated feedstock
• TSCA research and development demonstration permit
• EPA (TSCA) identification number to allow disposal of the test residues in accordance with
Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) requirements
• City of Bay City permit to discharge process waste water to the focal publicly-owned treatment
works.
KEY CONTACTS
These sources can provide additional information concerning the Demonstration:
2-9
-------
Gordon Evans
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Risk Reduction Engineering Laboratory
26 West Martin Luther King Drive
Cincinnati, OH 45219-0963
Phone:(513)569-7684
Fax:(513)569-7620
Craig Wardlaw
Wastewater Technology Center
867 Chemin Lakeshore Road
P.O. Box 5068
Burlington, Ontario L7R 4L7
Phone: (416) 336-4691
Douglas Hallett or James Nash
ELI Eco Logic International, Inc.
143 Dennis Street
Rockwood, Ontario, Canada NOB 2KO
Phone: (519)8569581
REPORT ORGANIZATION
Susan Kaelber-Matlock
Environmental Response Division
Michigan Department of Natural Resources
503 North Euclid Avenue
Bay City, Ml 48706
Phone:(517)684-9141
Edward Golson
City Hall
301 Washington Avenue
Bay City, Ml 48708
Phone:(517)894-8205
Fax: (517) 894-1070
This TER is organized into six sections plus appendices:
1. Executive Summary - Provides an overall introduction to the SITE Program and discussion of
the ELI process, as well as highlighting program conclusions and recommendations;
2. Introduction - Provides a discussion of the SITE Program, the Bay City Middleground Landfill
site, demonstration test objectives, testing conditions, and demonstration organization; '
3. Process Description - Contains a detailed description of the ELI process, waste handling, site
preparation, and field operational procedures;
4. Performance Evaluation - Summarizes the test data and results;
5. Sampling and Analytical Procedures - Outlines the specific sampling and analytical procedures
used during the demonstration;
6. Quality Assurance - Highlights the quality assurance and quality control (QA/QC) results and
conclusions as they relate to the data.
The appendices are a compilation of detailed test data intended for reference only.
2-10
-------
SECTION 3
PROCESS DESCRIPTION
PRETREATMENT AND PROCESSING REQUIREMENTS
The ELI Gas-Phase Chemical Reduction Process was originally designed to handle aqueous wastes
such as contaminated harbor sediment and groundwater by direct introduction into the system. Aqueous
and non-aqueous liquids could be processed from separate feed tanks or drums. During the
Demonstration, the process was evaluated separately with waste water, oily dense non-aqueous phase
liquid (DNAPL), and soil. The waste water and DNAPL were fed directly into the system with no
pretreatment. The soil was pre-screened through a 2-inch mesh to remove large rocks and other items
which would interfere with operation of the soil feed system. No other pretreatment of soils was
performed prior to treatment.
PROCESS DESCRIPTION
The ELI Gas-Phase Chemical Reduction Process treats organic hazardous waste in a hydrogen-rich
atmosphere at approximately 900°C (1620°F) and ambient atmospheric pressure. The reaction products
include HCI from the reduction of chlorinated organics such as PCBs, and lighter hydrocarbons such as
methane and ethylene from reduction of straight-chain and aromatic hydrocarbons. The absence of free
oxygen in the reactor prevents the formation of PCDD/PCDF. Water acts as a hydrogen donor to
enhance the reaction.
Figure 3-1 shows some of the reactions that theoretically lead to the major products and the major
intermediate and final products of the process, according to ELI. The first five principal reactions are
hydrogenation reactions that remove chlorine from the PCBs and reduce the higher molecular weight
hydrocarbons to simpler, more saturated compounds. The final reforming reaction regenerates hydrogen.
The first of the six reactions is the dechlorination and hydrogenation of a PCS molecule to produce a
benzene intermediate product and HCI. The second reaction is the reduction of PAH compounds, for
example phenanthrene, to produce benzene and ethylene intermediate products. These are the most
3-1
-------
1)
Cl
Cl
+ 5H2
PCB
Cl
Polycyclic aromatic
hydrocarbons
2) < 7—< 7+ 3H2
(Phenanthrene)
O
3) { > + 9H2
Benzene
4)
C2H4
2H2
o
2 f > + 4HCI
ydrog<
Chloride
Benzene Hydrogen
Chlorid
o
Benzene
6CH4
Methane
2CH4
Ethylene
5)
CnH(2n+2)
Straight-chain
hydrocarbons
CH4
+(n-1)H2
H20
nCH4
Methane
CO
Figure 3-1. Principal reactions of the ELI Gas-Phase Chemical Reduction Process.
rapid reactions. The third reaction is the ring scission and the reduction of benzene to produce methane.
The fourth reaction is the reduction of ethylene to produce methane. These reactions occur at
approximately the same rate. The fifth reaction is the reduction of the straight chain hydrocarbons to
produce methane. Equilibrium favors complete conversion of reactants in reactions 1 through 5, and
conversion is expected to be essentially > 99.99 percent under the conditions in the reactor. The last
important reaction is the water-gas shift reaction in which methane and water combine to produce carbon
monoxide and hydrogen. Equilibrium favors both reactants and products in this reaction, so conversion of
reactants is only about 20 percent.
Overall Arrangement
Figure 3-2 illustrates the process in a schematic diagram of the field demonstration unit. The
demonstration-scale reactor is 2 m (6 ft) in diameter and 3 m (9 ft) tall, mounted on a 15 m (45 ft) drop-deck
trailer. A scrubber system, recirculation gas system, and the electrical control center are also mounted on
3r2-
-------
Recirculated gas
\ «
fc
I -
Figure 3-2. Process flow diagram of Eco Logic Gas-Phase Chemical Reduction Process.
-------
the trailer. A second frailer holds a propane boiler, a waste preheating vessel and a waste storage tank,
ELI designed the demonstration unit to process 4,000 kg/day of waste oil, 10,000 kg/day of waste water,
and 25,000 kg/day of soil. The actual capacity of the system depends on the nature of the contaminants,
their degree of chlorination, and their water content. The ELI TDU—designed to remove most volatile,
most semivolatile, and some metallic contaminants—treats the soil.
Material Flow Through the Process
Aqueous wastes, organic liquid wastes, and solid waste are fed differently into the reactor. Aqueous
wastes are preheated to produce steam and a concentrated liquid stream prior to injection into the
reactor. Organic liquid wastes may be preheated or injected directly into the reactor. Soil is processed
through the TDU where volatile and semivolatile organics are volatilized into a hydrogen carrier gas
stream. The contaminant-laden stream is then injected into the reactor. Preheated hydrogen and
recirculated product gases are also injected into the reactor.
The reactor mixes the feed streams, heats them to 900°C (1,650°F), and provides residence time for
the reduction reactions to occur. Low molecular weight products exit the reactor and cool in the quench
leg of the scrubber. The scrubber removes fine particulates and HCI, yielding a clean hydrogen-rich
reformed gas. After scrubbing, most of the reformed gas recirculates to the reactor. The remainder is
compressed for storage or sent to the boiler, which produces process steam. The only air emissions
come from the boiler stack.
Process Components
The ELI demonstration unit consists of the following major components:
• Liquid waste handling system (including tanks, pumps, heat exchanger, etc.)
• TDU for soils
• Reactor
• Scrubber
• Boiler
• Product gas storage
• Process controls including a CIMS
3-4
-------
The following paragraphs describe the function of each major component and show how ;f fhs into the
overall process.
Liquid Waste Handling-
Waste liquid and suspended solids are fed directly to the reactor, or through a heat exchanger
vessel. For the SITE Demonstration, the contaminated aqueous feedstock was pumped into the heat
exchanger. Steam from the boiler, fuelled by propane and reformed gas, provides the heat to the heat
exchanger. The heat exchanger raises the temperature of the aqueous feed to about 150°C (300°F),
producing vaporized waste and a concentrated organic-rich liquid stream. The organic-rich liquid stream
and suspended solids stream flow to the reactor through atomizing nozzles. During the Demonstration, a
separate pump provided PCB-rich oils directly to the reactor through the atomizing nozzle.
Thermal Desorption Unit—
The TDU, designed to remove most volatile, most semivolatile and some metal contaminants, treats
the soil. A screw feeder delivers the contaminated soil into the TDU, which is swept with hydrogen gas to
carry the volatile and semivolatile substances evolved during soil heating to the reactor vessel. Treated
soil exits the TDU to a quench tank for subsequent disposal.
Reactor—
Figure 3-3 illustrates the reactor. Make-up hydrogen is added to the recirculation gas stream, which
passes through a gas-fired heat exchanger prior to flowing into the top of the reactor at 500°C (930°F).
The atomized liquid wastes and contaminant-laden gases from the TDU also enter the top of the reactor.
Nozzles spray the atomized feed and gas streams tangentially, spiralling past the electric resistance
heaters mounted around the central ceramic tube. The heaters raise the mixture temperature to 900°C
(1,650°F). The heated mixture flows up the inside of the ceramic tube into a short section of refractory-
lined duct. Large particles settle to the bottom of the reactor and are removed periodically. Fine
particles remain entrained in the gas stream. The residence time from the bottom of the reactor to the
exit of the duct is approximately 1 second.
Scrubber—
A wet scrubber removes HCI and particulate matter from the reformed gas. Gas from the reactor
enters the scrubber at about 750°C (1380°F) and flows downward through a quench section. Water is
introduced through spray nozzles at the entrance to the quench section. After
3-5
-------
Refractory lining
quenching, the gas travels upward
through a counter-current packed
bed. A large water-sealed vent, Electric heating elements
which acts as an emergency
pressure relief duct, passes
scrubber liquor to a tank below.
The liquor is pumped from the
tank through a heat exchanger for
cooling, and then back to the top
of the scrubber. Cooling water
circulates through an evaporative
cooling tower to the heat
exchanger. Caustic soda (NaOH)
and make-up water are added to
the scrubber liquor to maintain
To scrubber
Waste injection ports
Steel reactor wall
Ceramic-coated
stainless steel tube
Figure 3-3. ELI gas-phase chemical reduction reactor.
HCI removal efficiency. Scrubber liquor overflows goes to a settling tank. The scrubber produces two
effluent streams:' sludge and decant water. The scrubber operates at a nominal liquid to gas (l/g) ratio of
70 L/acm (0.5 gal/acf).
Boiler-
Gases exiting the scrubber contain excess hydrogen, reduction products such as methane and
ethylene, and a small amount of water vapor. Up to 95 percent of this gas recirculates back into the
reactor, depending on the waste being processed; a propane fired boiler uses the rest of the hydrogen-
rich gas as a supplementary fuel. The steam produced by the boiler is used to heat the waste liquid heat
exchanger.
Product das Storage—
When treating hjgh concentration organic wastes, the process generates excess reformed gas. The
system can compress the reformed gas and store it for later use as a fuel in other parts of the process
such as the boiler or TDU.
Process Control
The demonstration unit is controlled via 18 independent control loops using a personal computer-
based data acquisition and control system. It adjusts various components in the process automatically or
3-6
-------
ft allows the operator to make adjustments if the data vary outside the set limits. Table 3-1 lists the
monitored process variables, the measurement methods, the measurement frequencies, and the
respective monitoring stations. The locations of these monitoring stations are shown in Figure 3-4.
Temperatures, pressures, flow rates and operational (on/off) status of the pumps, motors, and fans are
monitored at critical locations in the process through thermocouples, pressure transmitters, flow meters,
gas analyzers, pH meters, and relays. The TDU employs a simple high-fire/ tow-fire temperature control
to maintain temperature.
TABLE 3-1. PROCESS CONTROL MONITORING STATIONS
Parameter
Temperature
Pressure
Flow rate
Feed rate
DH
Gas species
Monitoring ~
stations
2, 3,4, 5, 6, 7, 9. 11, 12. 13, 15. 16. 17. 18
12, 13, 16
1,4,7
7,10
7,10 .
13
8
13
14
5
7
Frequency
Continuous
Continuous
1/2 hour
Continuous
Continuous
Hourly
Hourly
1/2 hour
Continuous
Continuous
Method
Pressure transmitter
Differential pressure transmitter
Differential pressure transmitter
Vortex flow meter
Orifice meter
Vortex flow meter
pH meter
3xygen analyzer: CIMS
Process gases are sampled continually using an on-line chemical ionization mass spectrometer (CIMS)
gas analyzer system. The CIMS monitors up to ten different organic compounds. One compound is
selected as an indicator of destruction efficiency. The CIMS can specifically respond to chlorinated
organics such as chlorobenzene, which may potentially serve as an indicator of PCB destruction. In the
event of a process upset where total destruction of hazardous organic compounds is interrupted, the
CIMS could be used to trigger the control system to automatically divert all gases into a recirculation
mode and curtail waste feed until indicator concentrations fell back to normal levels, indicating a return to
normal conditions.
FACTORS AFFECTING DEMONSTRATION
The chronology of events during the SITE Demonstration Program is summarized in Table 3-2.
Because the initial installation and start-up of the demonstration unit required considerably longer than
originally anticipated, the test program was delayed. Prior to the first full test run, preliminary tests were
3-7
-------
Recirculated gas
-------
performed to establish target sample volumes for volatile organic compound sampling and to check
planned sampling procedures. The initial full test runs were affected by the same type of problems that
had delayed the initial start-up, such as process instrumentation and control deficiencies. As the team
gained more experience and these problems were resolved, the operation of the system improved.
The improvement continued throughout Condition 1 and 3 tests.
The Condition 2 tests (soil treatment) were rescheduled to the end of the test period due to delays
in construction and installation of the TDU. Start-up problems associated with the TDU were not fully
resolved prior to the first test run. This resulted in different operating conditions for the two test runs
which were completed. The final run for Condition 2 was canceled because feed problems could not be
resolved in the time available. Because of these problems, the TDU tests are considered as "proof-of-
concept" tests only.
The principal components of the ELI demonstration unit are the reactor, scrubber system, recirculating
fan, boiler, heat exchanger, thermal desorption unit (TDU), materials handling, and process monitoring.
Each of these components was a source of operating problems during the Demonstration. The key
problems, the corrective actions taken to resolve them, and the result of these actions are described
below.
Reactor
The operation of the steam flow control valve, used to regulate reactor pressure, was not stable.
Control improved as the operators gained experience, undertook system modifications, and made
program logic adjustments. During Condition 3 Run 1, reactor over-pressurization caused a complete
system shutdown, highlighting the importance of reactor pressure control.
Scrubber System
Initially, entrainment of scrubber liquor in the gas leaving the scrubber occurred due to foaming
caused by a piping error during scrubber installation. This interfered with the CIMS, the recirculating fan,
and the oxygen analyzer. After ELI made a piping modification, the foaming stopped and the scrubber
operated efficiently. The pH meter used to control caustic addition required frequent adjustment and
replacement, but never performed satisfactorily. Scrubber foaming may have affected the pH meter.
ELI was able to manually measure and adjust the scrubber pH, allowing the demonstration to continue.
3-9
-------
7/29/92
8/11/92
8/12/92
8/14/92
8/17/92
9/D9/92
10/7/92
10/12/92
10/13/92
10/14/92
10/15/92
10/16/92
10/17/92
TABLE 3-2. ECO LOGIC SITE DEMONSTRATION CHRONOLOGY
FWE1 ar'ives on-site to begin site preparation.
First EL! personnel arrive on-site.
First HER personnel arrive on-site.
Major ELI equipment trailer (reactor) arrives.
Boiler trailer arrives. •
Visitors day held.
Tracer pretest to calibrate stack trains conducted.
PCE causes EER tracer pump tubing to deteriorate. Tubing replaced.
pH meter not functioning. Tested pH manually.
Steam flowmeter not working properly.
Reactor pressure f!uctuations cause steam flow to shut down.
Begin Condition 1 Run 1.
Dry gas propane meter removed from boiler fuel line; hot functioning properly.
Steam flow control fluctuations minimized by control system adjustment.
Boiler frequently cycling between low- and high-fire; EER partlculate train filters tearing due
to stack pressure cycling ("chuffing").
Vaporizer liquid flow problems; metering valve not adequate.
Oz analyzer not functioning.
' Transfer from clean steam to dirty steam is very erratic, ELI adjusts flow. Complete Condftion
1 Run 1.
Replacement Oj analyzer sensor installed.
Begin Condition 1 Run 2 (later aborted),
"Chuffing" reduced by adjusting boiler combustion air damper linkage.
EER particulate train filters still tearing. .
Unit heater air fan Inoperative; ELI will replace It.
Power failure shuts off PCE pump; testing interrupted.
Gas booster fan getting water in it; Condition 1 Run 2 aborted.
Booster fan disassembled.
ELI discovers> thai scrubber internal piping Is Incorrect, resulting in water in sampling lines,
affecting CiMS, O2 analyzer, and gas booster fan.
ELI attempts to get system ready for next run; run postponed; system ramped up and down
using ciean steam.
H2 regulator malfunction.
H2 and N2 regulators checked and serviced.
Restart Condition 1 Run 2.
Problems still exist with the O2 analyzer, pH reliability, vaporizer flow.
Boiler cycling between high- and low-fire interrupts sampling.
Complete Condition 1 Run 2.
3-10
-------
10/19/92
10/21/92
10/22/92
10/23/92
TABLE 3-2. (continued)
Begin Condition 1 Run 3.
Vaporizer hot liquid metering valve plugged; ELI fabricates a blow-back valve.
Complete Condition 1 Run 3.
ELI purchases compressors and begins piping.
EPA auditors arrive.
Compressor piping continues.
Begin Condition 3 Run 1 (compression).
EER adds additional PCE because of short run period.
Gas being stored in compression trailer.
Reactor overpressure event; sampling was long enough to be accepted.
Complete compression phase of Condition 3 Run 1.
Begin Condition 3 Run 1 (stack sampling phase).
EER indicates that the stack flow rate is much higher than Condition 1.
ELI installing compressor piping changes to avoid reactor overpressure.
ELI experiencing RF interferences with computer data acquisition system.
Complete stack sampling phase of Condition 3 Run 1.
Begin Condition 3 Run 2 (compression and stack sampling).
Control computer moved inside boiler room to reduce RF interference. All computer
information lost for this run due to reinitialization of system.
Complete Condition 3 Run 2.
Booster fan temperature overload, ELI investigates; cause unknown.
High concentration of organics in waste caused high naphthalene (suspected) production
causing plugging of instrument ports; ELI cleans system.
Begin Condition 3 Run 3 (compression and stack sampling).
H2 feed was reduced during Run 2 due to faulty differential pressure gauge reading (ELI
using booster fan pressure rise to determine H2 content). This may have caused
inadequate H2 and inability to reduce all of the gas to methane. Now using H2 feed line
pressure to determine H2 content, although this is not as accurate.
O2 analyzer gummed up, cleaned.
EPA auditor arrives to complete audit.
Complete Condition 3 Run 3.
10/29/92 through to 11/29/92 - ELI assembling TDU.
11/28/92 Tin release.
11/29/92 Begin Condition 2 Run 1 (later aborted).
ELI has TDU feed hopper auger (feed rate) problems. ELI decides to change out auger
motor. Scrub Condition 2 Run 1.
10/24/92
10/25/92
10/26/92
i
10/27/92
10/28/92
3-11
-------
12/1)92
12/2/92
12/3/92
12/4)92
12/5/92
12/G92
12/7/92
12/8/92
TABLE 3-2. (continued)
Restart Condition 2 Run 1.
Auger clogged then cleaned out.
Hopper feed rate very low.
ELI not satisfied with treated soil condition (indication of poor desorptfen)
Complete Condition 2 Run 1.
ELI modifies TDU system to increase residence time.
Begin Condition 2 Run 2 (later aborted).
TDU hopper problems caused Condition 2 Run 2 to be aborted.
Restart Condition 2 Run 2 (later aborted).
ELI found TDU feed hopper plugged, hopper cleaned
Reformed gas line frozen.
ELI aborts Condition 2 Run 2, undesorbed materials passing through the TDU.
Decision to consider the TDU tests as "proof of concept" only
Frozen water lines delay testing.
72-hour operational reliability test begins.
TDU bath heat-up slowed by cold weather.
Restart Condition 2 Run 2.
TDU feed hopper auger problems continue.
Complete Condition 2 Run 2.
TSCA permit expires at midnight.
ELI decides to cancel Condition 2 Run 3 - inadequate destruction.
72-hour operational test concludes—processing non-contaminated material.
12/9/92 Demobilization begins, concludes on 12/18/92.
Recjreulatlnq Fan
Scrubber problems, mentioned above, introduced excessive moisture into the fan casing.
Eventually this condition adversely affected the fan's operation, requiring shutdown, cleaning, and motor
winding replacement.
Boiler
Under normal operation, the boiler cycles between high- and low-fire, depending on the system
requirements. However, the demonstration tests showed increased hydrocarbon emissions during tow-
fire operation, as described later in this report. During low fire operation, the stack gas flow rate was too
-3-12
-------
tow for accurate isoklnetic sampling, and the boiler cycling made stack sampling dffficuft. Therefore, steam
was vented in subsequent tests to maintain the boiler on high-fire. During Condition 1 tests, the boiler
stack static pressure was fluctuating from a slightly negative pressure to positive pressure ("chuffing").
This caused filters in the flue gas sampling trains to tear. This was resolved in subsequent tests by
placing two Teflon strips across the filters and by adjusting the boiler combustion air control damper
linkage, which greatly reduced the chuffing.
Liquid Food Svstem
Particulate in the hot waste water feed caused plugging of the metering valve, requiring frequent
adjustment. ELI fabricated a blow-back system that enhanced reliability, but further design work is
needed to improve reliability of the hot waste water feed system.
Thermal Desomtion Unit rrou)
The TDU was a source of several problems. During the initial trials at the design soil feed rate,
charred pieces of paper and plastic in the treated soil indicated that the feed probably had not reached a
sufficiently high temperature to desorb the organic contaminants. Therefore, the soil feed rate was
decreased substantially until the treated soil appeared to be free of such materials. The first test at the
target feed rate of 10 kg/min (22 Ib/hr) was aborted because of these problems. The first valid test run
for Condition 2 was conducted at a feed rate of 2.12 kg/min (4.67 Ib/hr). There still was concern over the
effectiveness of the soil treatment so the soil feed rate was decreased further during the second run to
0.40 kg/min (0.88 Ib/min). Due to these problems, the TDU test was considered "proof of concept" only.
The reactor and the TDU required long start-up periods to reach operating temperature during sub-
zero weather conditions. Due to these continuing problems with the TDU and expiration of the TSCA
permit, the third Condition 2 test run was canceled.
Materials Handling
Most materials handling problems were associated with the soil handling system during the Condition
2 tests. For the Demonstration, the material handling system consisted of a feed conveyor, live bottom
feed hopper, a feed screw, and a treated soils drag conveyor. The TDU feed hopper and feed screw
were plagued by frequent blockages caused by rags, wire, etc. ELI either had to force the material
through the feed hopper, or pull the feed screw to remove the material causing blockage. To address
3-13
-------
this problem during the Demonstration, the site soil was scooped onto a steel plate above the teed
conveyor, problem material was manually removed, and the manually-sorted soil was pushed onto the
conveyor belt. Frequent problems with the screw feeder contributed to the significantly reduced feed
rates throughout the demonstration. Since material handling can greatly affect system performance and
cost, ELI should consider various soil pretreatment steps, such as size reduction and classification to make
the feedstock acceptable to the system, or consider an alternative feeder design.
Process Monitoring
The process monitoring system was also a source of a few operating problems. The oxygen
analyzer did not operate reliably. This is an important consideration since elevated levels of O2 in the
system can create an explosive atmosphere. Apparently, blockages in the analyzer sampling line caused
this problem.
The differential pressure gauge that was used to evaluate the hydrogen (Ha) content in the system is
critical to ensure reduction of the organics. Insufficient hydrogen content will slow the reaction kinetics and
favor incomplete reduction. During Condition 3 Run 2, this instrument gave a low reading, towering the H2
content and generating an oily residue that coated equipment and instrumentation. This caused sampling
problems and unreliable operation. It also is suspected of producing elevated naphthalene levels in
most samples analyzed for Condition 3.
Radio frequency (RF) interferences, which ELI later identified as emanating from the spark plug
cables on the recirculated gas heater, caused a loss of data from the process control computer during
Condition 3, Runs 2 and 3. Because the data files were not backed up on floppy disks, all electronically
stored process operating data for these runs were lost. Manual data logs and estimates of key data
were used to define process conditions. Therefore, the accuracy of these data was reduced.
PROCESS OPERATING CONDITIONS
All process operating parameters were measured directly, except for hydrogen content, recirculation
flow rate, and residence time. The orifice meter designed to measure the recirculation flow rate did not
provide accurate readings when the process was in normal operation. Therefore, recirculation flow rate
was estimated by ELI, based on the position of the flow control valve and the flow rate measured when
primarily nitrogen was being circulated. Recirculation flow rate is a factor in calculating residence time;
therefore, the reported residence times are also estimates. The accuracy of these estimates is unknown^
3-14 ' ' ,~~-•---•"'""'
-------
This does not adversely impact achievement of the primary Demonstration objectives; however, reliability
of scale-up information and conclusions involving reactor mass balances (Section 5) may be reduced.
Target and Actual Operating Conditions
Tables 3-3, 3-4, and 3-5 compare actual and target process operating conditions for Conditions 1, 2,
and 3, respectively. Target process operating conditions were established prior to the test, based on
anticipated waste characteristics and ELI's design criteria for the demonstration-scale unit. As shown in the
tables, the most important process operating parameters (reactor temperature, residence time
(calculated), gas booster differential pressure, and molten bath temperature) all were within the
operational limits established prior to the test. However, ELI was unable to achieve the target waste
input feed rates.
Table 3-6 compares target and actual waste feed conditions. The waste feed rate targets were
based on 1990-1991 ELI site survey results, which found that the waste oil recovered from the site
contained approximately 39 percent PCBs and the site soils contained approximately 1,000 ppm PCBs.
Actual PCB concentration in the waste oil processed during this Demonstration was 24.6 percent (average
of Conditions 1 and 3, mono- through deca- congeners). During Condition 1 tests, the waste water feed
rate fell below the target because of unresolved feed system problems. The low feed rate was only
discovered after the test because the instantaneous water feed rate could not be measured during the
test. However, the target PCB input concentration was achieved for Condition 1. During Condition 2
tests, soil feed rate was limited by soil feed system problems and by apparent "short-circuiting" of soi\ in
the TDU (some untreated material was visible exiting the TDU during Run 1). PCB concentration in the
soils was somewhat lower than the planned level. Also, clean steam from the boiler was used as a
process feedstock for Condition 2 instead of waste water. During Condition 3 tests, the waste oil feed
rate was lower than planned due to the capacity of the peristaltic pump. The PCB input concentration
and rate were substantially below target due to this and the lower-than-expected PCB concentration in
the waste oil. It should be noted that the waste oil feed rates achieved for Condition 3 were sustained
for a maximum of 2.8 hours (Run 2) before reaching the capacity of the compressed storage system for
the reformed gas product. Reformed gas was not fed to the boiler while processing waste oil during
Condition 3 to facilitate flue gas sampling. The time required to completely consume the compressed
reformed gas in the boiler was 4.5 to 9 times that required for waste processing.
3-15
-------
TABLE 3-3. CONDITION 1 SUMMARY OF PROCESS OPERATION
o>
L Parameter
Waste water feed rate
Waste oil feed rate
PCE (spike) injection rate
Vaporizer pressure
Vaporizer temperature
Reactor temperature
Recirculation heater exit temperature
Reactor pressure
Gas booster differential pressure
Recirculation flowrate **
Scrubber inlet gas temperature
Scrubber exit temperature
Scrubber liquor pH
Scrubber inlet water temperature
System oxygen
Oxygen - boiler stack
Residence time**
Reformed gas pressure
Recirculation vacuum
Monochlorobenzene*
Dichlorobenzene*
Trichlorobenzene*
*RasoH nn CMMC
Monitoring
Station
-
-
-
12
12
2
9
1
7
-
3
6
5
5
10
11
-
10
7
10
10
10
Units
kg/min
kg/min
g/min
psig
°C
°C
°C
in. WC
in. WC
cfm
°C
°C
_
°C
%
%
sec
in.WC
in.WC
ppm
ppm
ppb
Oct12, 1992
Run1
1.44
0.027
6.49
55.4
150
900
487
2.1
12.7
110
559
30
9.20
t
0.067
7.9
8.2
8.7
Oto-3
3.59
5.51
37
Oct17, 1992
Run 2
2.75
0.026
6.50
48.9
147
893
482
1.3
10.4
110
484
36
7.92
t
0.053
6.6
6.2
6.7
<0
1.98
1.22
88
Oct19, 1992
Run 3
1.01
0.020
6.35
51.2
148
884
474
2.0
11.6
110
595
32
9.24
45.6
0.031
6.2
9.5
4.0
<0to5
6.15
6.30
223
Target
condition
j
5
0.05
6.51
55
900
500
0
100
9
>35
0
Operational
limits
'II I.LIIIMI I ,J
+/- 10%
+/- 10%
40-60
850-1000
450-550
-10 to +10
<16
80-120
9-10
<0 04
>3
-------
TABLE 3-4. CONDITION 2 SUMMARY OF PROCESS OPERATION
Parameter
Contaminated soil feed rate
Clean steam
Hexachlorobenzene (spike) feed rate
TDU bath temperature
TDU dome temperature
TDU combustion gas temperature
TOU exhaust gas temperature
TDU pressure
Reactor temperature
Recirculation heater exit temperature
Reactor pressure
Gas booster differential pressure
Recirculation flow rate **
Scrubber inlet gas temperature
Scrubber exit temperature
Scrubber liquor pH
Scrubber inlet water temperature
System oxygen
Oxygen - boiler stack
Residence time**
Reformed gas pressure
^circulation vacuum
Monochlorobenzene*
Dichlorobenzene*
Trichlorobenzene*
Hexachlorobenzene*
Monitoring
Station
—
13
—
15
16
17
18
16
2
9
1
7
—
3
6
5
5
10
11
—
10
7
10
10
10
10
Units
kg/min
kg/min
q/min
°C
°C
°C
°C
in. WC
°C
°C
in. WC
in. WC
efm
°C
°C
—
°C
%
%
sec
in. WC
in. WC
ppm
ppm
ppb
PPb
Dec1, 1992
Run 1
2.12
1.89
16.8
616
614
662
398
2.0
890
48O
2.23
10.2
11O
506
32
8.42
44.9
0.020
6.10
5.8
8
3
0.03
12.0
569
453
Dec 7, 1992
Run 2
0.40
1.38
9.87
632
610
653
500
2.5
890
481
2.69
8.09
110
502
32
8.42
37.2
0.01 0
7.57
9.6
2.45
<0
0.22
12.8
83
1
Target
condition
1O
1
41
__
_
—
__
_
90O
500
0
—
100
_
_
^_
>35
0
«
__
mri
.
_
Operational
limits
+/- 10%
+/- 10%
^_
«
L
850-1000
450-55O
-1O to +1O
<16
80-1 2O
t
•_
<0.04
>3
<1OO
**ELI estimate based on a manual valve setting.
-------
TABLE 3-5. CONDITION 3 SUMMARY OF PROCESS OPERATION
Parameter
Waste water feed rate
Waste oil feed rate
PCE (spike) injection rate
Vaporizer pressure
Vaporizer temperature
Reactor temperature
Recirculation heater exit temperature
Reactor pressure
Gas booster differential pressure
Recirculation flow rate **
Scrubber inlet gas temperature
Scrubber exit temperature
Scrubber liquor pH
Scrubber inlet water temperature
System oxygen
Oxygen - boiler stack
Residence time
Reformed gas pressure
Recirculation vacuum
Monochlorobenzene*
Dichlorobenzene*
TriChlorobenzene*
Monitoring
Station
—
. ; —
—
12
12
2
9
1
7
—
3
6
5
5
10
11
—
10
7
10
10
10
Units
kg/min
kg/min
g/min
PSI
°C
°C
°C
in. WC
in. WC
cfm
°C
°C
—
°C
%
%
sec
in. WC
in. WC
ppm
ppm
PPb
Oct23, 1992
Run 1
4.74
0.355
13.O
53.1
149
901
47O
2.1
8.8
110
492
31
9.45
38.7
0.058
7.9
3.7
2
***
22.0
8.33
555
Oct26, 1992
Run 2
1.04
O.447
13.1
5O.O
•»**
903
•***
1.5
9.1
110
526
32
8.80
44.O
***
8.1
7.0
0
***
25.1
6.42
313
Oct28, 1992
Run 3
0.88
0.353
13.2
51 .0
***
994
***
1.8
5.5
110
562
32
9.70
42.0
•***
7.9
7.5
0
**«
5.63
4.83
18
Target
condition
1
1
13.O2
55
—
900
500
0
—
100
—
—
9
>35
O
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Operational
limits
•*/- 10%
+/- 10%
—
4O-6O
- —
850-1 OOO
45O-55O
-1O to +10
<16
80-1 2O
—
— .
9-10
—
3
_
_
<10O
—
—
CD
'Based on CIMS.
"ELI estimate based on a manual valve setting.
"No valid data obtained due to computer data acquisition system fault (see page 3-14).
-------
TABLE «, COMPARISON OF TARGET AND ACTUAL WASTE FEED CONDITIONS
Condition
Condition 1
Waste water
Condition 2
Soil
Condition 3
Waste oil
%
Parameter
Waste water feed rate
Waste oil feed rate
PCB* concentration in waste water
PCB* concentration in waste oil
PCB* concentration in total feed
Total waste processed
Soil feed rate
Waste water feed rate
PCS' concentraton in feed
Total waste processed
Waste water feed rate"
Waste oil feed rate**
PCB* concentration in waste water
PCB* concentration in waste oil
PCB* concentration in total feed
Total waste processed
Units
kg/min
kg/min
ppmw
wt.%
ppmw
k9
kg/min
kg/min
ppmw
kq
kg/min
kg/min
ppmw
wt. %
wt. %
kq
Target
value
5.0
0.05
4,000
8,000
10
1
1000
17.500
1
20
800
Actual value
Run1
1.44
0.027
<0.023
23.8
4,365
569
2.12
<538
767
4.74
0.355
<0.037
25.4
1.77
280
Run 2
2.75
0.026
<0.027
2,217
1047
0.40
<716
196
1.04
0.447
<0.025
7.65
251
< = includes detection limits for non-detected congeners
Run3
1.01
0.020
<0.021
4,689
472
-
0.88
0.353
<0.016
7.25
193
Total
•ViV.'.V.
:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:
'2,088"
::x:x*x
963
.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.
"724"
Mean
1.73
0.024
<0.023
23.8
..3,757.
<627
X-Xv.'vX
2.22
0.385
<0.026
25.4
5.56
*PCB concentrations are sum of mono through deca congeners
"Feed rates are based on actual waste processing time
3-19
-------
This page is intentionally left blank
3-20
-------
SECTION 4
SAMPLING AND ANALYTICAL PROCEDURES
SAMPLING LOCATIONS
Table 4-1 provides a summary of the sampling locations. Figure 4-1 shows each sampling location
relative to the process. The procedures are brief ly summarized in this section.
TABLE 4-1. SAMPLING LOCATIONS
Stream
Description
Location
dOI
SS2
SS3
SS4
SS5
SS6
SS7
SS8
SS9
SS10
SS11
SS12
SS13
SS14
SS15
SS16
SS17
SS18
SS19
SS20
SS21
SS22
SS23
SS24
Waste water
Waste oil
Contaminated soil
Caustic
Scrubber make-up water
Propane
Hydrogen
(deleted)
Combustion air
Treated soil
Reactor grit
Scrubber sludge
Scrubber decant
Reformed gas :
Tankcondensate
Stack gas
(deleted)
Heat exchanger
TDU gas
TDU molten bath
(deleted)
Scrubber liquor
(deleted)
Quench water
Feed line before pump
DNAPLdrum
Feed drum
Caustic reservoir tank
Valve off of feed line
Valve off of feed line
Valve off of feed line
Inlet to boiler
Treated soil collection drum
Reactor grit catchpot
Scrubber effluent tank
Scrubber effluent tank
Tee after gas booster fan
Valve off the bottom of tank
3oiler stack
Heat exchanger residue waste drum
Valve off of TDU to reactor feed line
3ath vessel
Scrubber tank
Quench tank water
4-1
-------
Recirculated gas
SS14J t i
Compressed
storage
| HCB (spike)
[Decant water^-
Sludge
Scrubber liquor^*
—m Reactor grif^>-
Stack gas>
Combustion air|
Sampling k>catk»ns
Figure 4-1. Sampling locations .
-------
GAS STREAMS
r . . •
Six gas streams were sampled, one flue gas stream and five process streams. These were SS16
(boiler flue gas), SS14 (reformed gas), SS19 (TDU off-gas), SS7 (hydrogen), SS6 (propane), and SS9
(combustion air). Table 4-2 summarizes the gas sampling methods employed for these tests.
TABLE 4-2. GAS STREAM SAMPLING AND ANALYTICAL METHODS
Analyte
PCBs
Dioxins
Furans
PAH
CB-CP
Volatile organics
Metals
HCI/HF
Part'culate
NOx
S02
Qz
COz
CO
THC
Fixed gases
Sulfur compounds
Heating value
Sampling principle
XAD-2 adsorption
XAD-2 adsorption
XAD-2 adsorption
XAD-2 adsorption
XAD-2 adsorption
Tenax adsorption
Impinger absorption
Impinger absorption
Filter
CEMS
CEMS
CEMS
CEMS
CEMS
CEMS
Tedarbag
Tedlarbag
Tedlarbag
Reference
EPA 0010 (SW-848)
EPA 0010 (SW-846)
EPA 0010 (SW-846)
EPA 0010 (SW-846)
EPA 0010 (SW-846)
EPA 0030 (SW-846)
EPA29 (draft)
EPA26(40CFR60)
EPA5(40CFR60)
EPA 7E (40 CFR 60)
EPA6C(40CFR60)
EPA3A(40CFR60)
EPA3A(40CFR60)
EPA 10 (40 CFR 60)
EPA25A(40CFR60)
EPA 18 (40 CFR 60)
EPA 18 (40 CFR 60)
EPA 18 (40 CFR 60)
HRGC/HRMS
HRGC/HRMS
HRGC/HRMS
GC/MS
GC/MS
GC/MS
GF-AAS,CV-AAS,ICAP
1C
Gravimetric
Chemiluminescence
NDUV
Paramagnetic
NDIR
NDIR
FID
GC
GC/FPD
GC
EPA 680 (SW-846)
EPA 23 (40 CFR <50)
EPA 23 (40 CFR (50)
EPA 8270 (SW-846)
EPA 8270 (SW-846)
EPA 5041 (SW-846)
EPA 29 (draft)
EPA 26 (40 CFR 60)
EPA 5 (40 CFR 60)
EPA 7E (40 CFR 60)
EPA 6C (40 CFR 60)
EPA 3A (40 CFR 60)
EPA 3A (40 CFR (50)
EPA 10 (40 CFR 6iO)
EPA 25A (40 CFR 60)
MASA133
EPA 15 (40 CFR €0)
ASTM2620M
Boiler Flue Gas(SS16)
The exhaust for the boiler was a round 8-inch diameter stack fitted with 10 ports (4 pairs, plus 2 single.
ports). The ports were installed to comply with EPA Method 1A guidelines; all of the sampling trains were
able to operate simultaneously.
PAH, PCB, CB/CP, and PCDD/PCDF-
Semivolatile organics including PAH, PCB, CB/CP, and PCDD/PCDF were sampled using EPA
Method 0010 (SW-846). The sample was obtained isokinetically from the boiler flue gas, filtered at 121 °C
(250°F), and passed through a condenser and XAD-2 sorbent trap maintained below 20°C (68°F), where
semivolatile organics were stripped from the sample. The sample was then passed through impingers
placed in an ice bath to remove additional organics which may escape the sorbent trap. Sampling periods
4-3
-------
typically 4 fours. The fi|ter( condensa^ sort)enti and jmpinger solutions were extracted and
analyzed by high resolution gas chroma'tography/high resolution mass spectroscopy (HRGC/HRMS). The
sorbent trap preparation and analysis using EPA Methods 23 and 8290 was modified by using additional
standards and making appropriate splits and recombinations of sample extracts to allow determination of
PCDD/PCDF, PAH, PCB, and CB/CP from a single sample. The PCB analysis using EPA Method 680 was
modified to incorporate HRGC/HRMS analysis for improved speciation of congener groups.
Volatile Organics-
Volatile organfcs were sampled using the Volatile Organic Sampling Train (VOST) procedure of EPA
Method 0030 (SW-846). The sample was obtained non-isokinetically from the boiler flue gas and passed
through two chilled condenser and Tenax sorbent trap sets in series. The condensers cooled the sample
to less than 20°C (68°F). The second sorbent trap contained Tenax resin followed by charcoal. Sampling
periods were typically 50 minutes. The sorbent traps and condensate were analyzed by GC/MS according
to EPA Method 5041.
Trace Metals and Particulate-
Trace metals and particulate matter were determined according to combined EPA Methods 29 (draft)
and 5. The sample was obtained isokinetically from the boiler stack, filtered at 121°C (250°F), and passed
through a series of impingers containing nitric acid/hydrogen peroxide followed by acidified potassium
permanganate. Sampling periods were generally 4 hours. Particulate matter collected on the filter and in
the probe was determined gravimetrically according to EPA Method 5. The samples then were digested
in acid and analyzed for antimony, arsenic, barium, beryllium, cadmium, chromium, copper, lead,
manganese, nickel, phosphorus, selenium, silver, thallium, zinc, and tin by inductively coupled argon
plasma emission spectroscopy (ICAP) and graphite furnace atomic absorption spectroscopy (GF-AAS).
Mercury was determined by cold vapor atomic absorption spectroscopy (CV-AAS). The only modification
to the methods was the determination of 5 additional trace metals from the sample.
HCI and HF-
HCI and HF were determined using EPA Method 26. The sample was collected non-isokinetically
from the boiler flue gas, filtered at 121°C (250°F), and passed through a series of impingers placed in an
ice bath. The impingers contained dilute sutfuric acid absorbing solution to dissolve HCI and HF into
chloride and fluoride ions followed by sodium hydroxide scrubbing solution. The method was modified to
employ full-size impingers instead of midget impingers. Sampling periods were generally 120 minutes.
The samples were analyzed by ion chromatography (1C).
4-4
-------
Opacity-
Opacity was determined by visual observation following EPA Method 9.
NOX, S02, THC, 02, C02-
A continuous emissions monitoring system was used to characterize NOx, S02l THC, 02l C02
concentrations in the flue gas. The flue gas sample was extracted from the stack non-isokinetically and
transported through heated lines and through a heated filter and flow regulator. A separate heated line
was used for THC monitoring and the sample was not dried. The balance of the sample was dried in a
refrigeration chiller, and distributed to the other analyzers. The response of the analyzers was recorded
on a strip chart recorder and a computer data acquisition system. Average concentrations for each run
were calculated after each test.
Process Gas Streams-SSU. SS19. SS6. SS7. SS9
Samples were obtained from these streams and analyzed using methods similar to those described
above for boiler flue gas sampling, with additional modifications to facilitate safe sampling of hydrogen
atmospheres by reintroducing the sample train exhaust into the process stream. These streams were not
sampled isokinetically either because they contained no paniculate matter or because of safety
considerations (high temperature hydrogen atmospheres). Fixed gases (02, C02l CO, NOX, H2, CH4),
VOC, heating value, and sulfur compounds were sampled from SS6 (propane feed), SS9 (combustion
air), and SS14 (reformed gas) using Tedlar bags according to EPA Method 18. SVOC sampling was
modified to eliminate the filter and impingers for clean, dry process streams (e.g., SS6 • propane) and dirty
streams were filtered using a heated quartz wool plug instead of the heated quartz fiber filter. Sorbent trap
preparation and analysis procedures for these streams were generally similar to those for boiler flue gas,
with modifications depending on the target analytes.
SOLID STREAMS
Samples of contaminated soil were taken as soil was transferred from the drums to the feed conveyer
periodically (30 - 60 minute intervals) during each test. Samples of treated soil were taken from the
quench tank conveyer periodically during each test at approximately the same frequency as contaminated
soil. The individual grab samples were divided into a single composite sample by the "cone and quarter"
technique. Reactor grit and scrubber sludge samples were collected only at the end of the final run for
4-5
-------
each \©s\ condition. Grab samples were collected following recommended EPA procedures1, and
analytical procedures were generally similar to those used for flue gas sampling to enhance comparability
of data. Table 4-3 summarizes the sampling and analytical methods used for solids samples.
TABLE 4-3, SOLIDS SAMPLING AND ANALYTICAL METHODS
Analvte
PCBs
Dioxins
Furans
CB/CP
Pah
Volatile organics
Metals
Organic halogens
Inorganic halogens
Hexavalent chromium
Total sulfur
TCLP volatiles
TCLP metals
Ash
Heating value
Ultimate analysis
Total organic carbon
Density
Sarnolina orinciole
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Analytical orinciole
GC/MS
HRGC/HRMS
HRGC/HRMS
GC/MS
GC/MS
GC/MS
CV-AAS, ICAP
1C
1C
colorimetrically
gravimetric
GCMS
CV-AAS, ICAP
combustion/gravimetric
bomb calorimeter
combustion
GC
hydrometer
Reference
EPA680(SW-846V
EPA 8290
EPA 8290
EPA 8270
EPA 8270
SW-846
SW-846
SW-846
SW-846
EPA 8260 (SW-846
EPA 6010, 7471 (SW-846)
EPA 9020 (SW-846)
ASTM E776
EPA 71 96 (SW-846)
ASTMD3177
EPA 8240 (SW-846)
EPA 6010,
7470 (SW-8461
ASTMD482 "".'"
ASTM D240
/
ASTMD3176
EPA 9060 (SW-846)
ASTMD1298
LIQUID STREAMS
Grab samples were collected following the general guidelines provided in EPA SW-846 and analytical
procedures were generally similar to those described above. A sample of the waste oil was taken from
the drum at the beginning of Conditions 1 and 3 (all waste oil came from the same drum during each
condition). Waste water was sampled periodically from the feed line during each run. A sample of
scrubber make-up water and scrubber caustic was obtained for each test condition. Samples of the
scrubber liquor, heat exchanger residue, and TDU quench water were obtained at the beginning and end
of each test condition in which they were generated. Scrubber decant water and reformed gas tank
condensate samples were collected after each run. Individual waste water grab samples were placed in
sample containers, sealed with zero headspace, and stored at 4°C (39°F) to prevent loss of VOCs.
These were combined after each test in a Tedlar-lined bucket and a single sample was extracted from the
bucket for analysis. All liquid samples for volatile and semivolatile organics analysis were stored in sealed
sample containers with zero headspace at 4°C (39°F) until analyzed. Individual grab samples for other
1 "Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste" (SW-846), Third Edition, Volume II, Chapter Nine
(November, 1986).
4-6
-------
analyses were composited by mixing them in a large dedicated Tedlar-lined container. Table 4-4
summarizes the sampling and analytical methods used for liquid samples.
TABLE 4-4. LIQUIDS SAMPLING AND ANALYTICAL METHODS
™ Analvte
PCBs
Dioxins
Furans
CB/CP
PAH
Volatile organics
Metals
Organic halogens
Inorganic halogens
Hexavalent chromium
Total sulfur
TCLP volatiles
TCLP metals
Ash
Heating value
Ultimate analysis
Total organic carbon
Density
pH
Samolino orinciole
'Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Analytical orinciole
(SCM!
HRGC/HRMS
HRGC/HRMS
GC/MS
GC/MS
GC/MS
CV-AAS, ICAP
1C
1C
colorimetry
ICAP
GC/MS
CV-AAS, ICAP
combustion/gravimetric
bomb calorimeter
combustion
GC
hydrometer
pH meter
Reference
tPA 680 (SW-846)
EPA 8290
EPA 8290
EPA 8270
EPA 8270
EPA 8260
SW-846
SW-846
SW-846
SW-846
SW-846
)
I
I
,
EPA 6010, 7470 (SW-846)
EPA 9020 (SW-846)
EPA 325.2
EPA 71 96
EPA 6010
EPA 8240
SW-846
SW-846
SW-846
EPA 6010, 7470 (Si
EPA 160.4
ASTM D240
ASTMD3176
/V-846)
/
EPA 9060 (SW-846)
ASTMD1298
EPA 9040 (SW-846)
SAMPLE STREAM FLOW RATE DETERMINATION
Whenever possible, EER directly measured the flow rate of each sample stream. Average flow rates
for several streams were based on pre- and post-test weights of containers on a calibrated scale (SS2,
SS3, SS10, SS11, SS12, SS13, SS15, SS18, SS22, and SS24). Flow rates for streams SS5, SS6, and
SS7 were based on process flow meters. A calibrated S-type pilot tube was used to measure gas flow
rates at SS9 and SS16. Changes in tank level over the sample period and density were used for
streams SS1 and SS24. Due to the nature of the sampling locations, EER was unable to directly measure
the mass flow rate of reformed gas (SS14), TDU off-gas (SS19), and the molten bath (SS20). Reformed
gas flow rate was estimated from the flow control valve position and pre-test flow data provided by ELI.
TDU off-gas were estimated based on mass balances around the TDU. The mass of metal in the flow
rates of individual substances in the molten bath was based on the weight of a single metal bar and the
total number of bars added to the system. See Section 5 for additional details of flow rate determination
procedures.
4-7
-------
This page is intentbnally left blank
4-8
-------
SECTION 5
PERFORMANCE EVALUATION
MASS BALANCE AND ORGANIC DESTRUCTION
Because of the complexity of the ELI process, one of the objectives of this project was to establish
mass balances for the process streams, metals, carbon, hydrogen, oxygen, chlorine, and sulfur. These
balances indicate the overall quality of the sampling and analysis procedures and establish the fate of key
substances. Ideally, the sum of mass measured in the output streams should equal the sum of mass
measured in the inputs. However, due to sampling and analytical errors inherent in the methods,
complete closure is seldom achieved. Another objective of the project was to evaluate the organic
destruction capability of the process. Organic destruction is indicated by the destruction efficiency (DE)
and destruction and removal efficiency (ORE) of key organics including PCBs, dioxins/furans, PCE, and
HCB. The ORE indicates the quantity of a substance input to the system which does not exit the system
from the boiler stack, while the DE indicates the amount of substance input to the system which is
destroyed. PCBs, PCE, and HCB entered the system at levels sufficient to provide accurate evaluations
of the system's organic destruction potential.
MBC. DE. and ORE Computations and
The term mass balance closure (MBC) is defined in this report as the deviation from perfect closure,
Perfect closure means the sum of outputs is equal to the sum of inputs, and the MBC equals zero.
Quantifying MBC, DE, and ORE for the ELI reduction process was an involved task, due to the number
of streams flowing in and out of the system. In addition, several process streams accumulated in the
system during the test and required special sampling and data reduction techniques. To determine the
MBC, ORE, and DE required four key steps:
(1) Defining "control volumes" and identifying each process stream entering, exiting, or
accumulating inside the conirol volumes.
(2) Identifying the monitoring and sampling procedures for each process stream.
&-1
-------
(3) Determining which substances and parameters needed to be quantified for each process
stream and how these substances and parameters would be determined.
(4) Defining the equations and assumptions.
Control Volumes—
The primary control volume for the ELI reduction process is illustrated within the dotted line in Rgure
5-1. Only those streams which are circled cross the control volume and are included in the computations.
Other streams such as the combustion air, propane, and flue gas for the TDU do not mix with the reactor
process streams and are not included in the calculations. Streams which are circled and underlined are
internal to the control volume; they do not flow in and out of the system. These internal streams have an
initial mass which either increases or decreases as the test proceeds. For instance, the scrubber liquor
tank is clean at the beginning of the test; organics and inorganics accumulate there as waste streams are
processed.
The control volume described above is used to evaluate the MBC, ORE, and DE critical objectives.
To determine the effectiveness of the reactor itself at reducing organics, DE and DREs also were
calculated based on sampling the TDU off-gas input and reformed gas output, excluding the boiler and
the TDU from the calculations. The reactor control volume is illustrated in Figure 5-2.
Process Monitoring and Sampling Procedures—
An extensive matrix of monitoring and sample collection activities to support mass balances was
planned as shown in Table 5-1. The sample collection frequency and procedures were chosen to provide
the best representation of the flow rate for substances entering and exiting the system as well as the
collection of substances within the system. In most cases, the weight or volume of the stream was
measured directly. However, suitable instrumentation was not available for the propane and combustion
air streams. For these streams, combustion calculations based on the stack gas flow rate and nitrogen
level, reformed gas nitrogen content, and propane composition were used to compute the flow rates.
Sample Analyses—
The sample analyses required for the MBC, DE, and ORE computations for each stream are shown in
Table 5-2. Density is required to convert analytical results reported on a volume basis to a mass basis.
Moisture content is used to convert results reported on a dry basis to a wet basis. In addition, moisture
analysis is used to determine the hydrogen and oxygen content of wet streams. In most cases, the
concentrations and densities for the analytes shown in Table 5-2 were determined by sampling and
5-2
-------
I Decant wate^>-
Sludge
{**
4
SSI 2
Decant water Decant water
—j Reactor grit
— — - Control volume boundary
Sampling locations
Figure 5-1. Control volumes and sampling locations for complete system mass balance.
-------
N,
Reformed
gas
MaKe-up
water
Compressed
storage
Decant water
- — ~f SS22 -V-*--*-
Tank
cortdensate
—I Reactor gnt
Clean steam
Waste feed
-------
TABLE 5-1. MASS BALANCE, ORE, AND DE SAMPLE COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS SUMMARY
Process stream
Heat exchanger
Input
Waste water feed
Internal
Residual waste
Input
Waste feed oil/sludge
Hydrogen
Output
Residual grit
Input
Contaminated soil
Hydrogen
TDU off-gas
Output
Clean soil
Internal
Quench water
Desorber bath
Input
Scrubber lime water
Scrubber make-up watei
Internal
Scrubber liquor
Output
Reformed gas
Scrubber sludge
Scrubber decant water
Input
Propane
Combustion air
Output
Flue gas
Output
Condensate
location
SS1
SS18
SS2
SS7
SS11
SS3
SS7
SS19
SS10
SS24
SS20
SS4
SS5
SS22
SS14
SS12
SS13
S6
S9
S16
S15
Monitoring method
Weight of waste water used
Weight of residual
Weight of oil used
Volume of gas used
Weight of grit collected
Weight of soil used
Volume of gas used
Volume flow rate
Weight of soil collected
Volume of water
Volume of tin
Volume of lime water used
Volume of water used
Volume of liquor
Volume flow rate
Volume of sludge collected
Volume of decant water collected
F-factor
Stack N2 and reformed gas M2
Volume flow rate
Weight of condensate collected
At end of run
Before and after run
At end of run
At end of run
At end of condition
At end of run
At end of run
At end of run
At end of run
Before and after run
Before and after condition
At end of run
At end of run
Before and after run
At end of run
At end of run
At end of run
At end of run I
At end of run I
At end of run
At end of run
Sample collectk
Four times per run
Before and after run
Once per drum
Once per lot
After condition
Once per drum
Once per lot
Integrated sample
Once per drum
Before and after run
Before and after condition
Once per lot
Once per condition
Before and after run
Integrated sample
After run
After run
Once per lot
One run per condition
Integrated sample
After run
n
Run composite
Before and after condition composites
Condition composite
Each lot
Condition sample
Run composite
Each lot
Integrated sample
Run composite
Run samples
Condition samples
Each lot
Condition samples
Run samples
Integrated sample
Run samples
Condition composite
Each lot
Condition sample
Integrated sample
Condition composite
-------
TABLE 5-2. MASS BALANCE ANALYSIS SUMMARY
Process stream
Heat exchanger
Input
Waste water feed
Internal
Residual waste
Reactor
Input ?
Waste feed oil/sludge
Hydrogen
Output
Residual grit
Thermal desorber
Input
Contaminated soil
Hydrogen
Oufyut
TDU off-gas
Clean soil
Interne]
Quench water
Desorber bath
Input
Scrubber caustic
Scrubber make-up water
Output
Reformed gas
Scrubber sludge
Scrubber decant water
Internal
Scrubber liquor
Boiler
Input
Propane
Combustion air
Output ,
Flue gas
Compressed storage
Output
Condensate
Sampling
location
SS1
SS18
SS2
SS7
SS11
SS3
SS7
SS19
SS10
SS24
SS20
SS4
SS5
SS14
SS12
SS13
SS22
SS6
SS9
SS16
SS15
Density
X
(3)
nn
(4)
nn
nn
(4)
nn
nn
(3)
(5)
X
X
(4)
(6)
X
X
(4)
(4)
(4)
(3)
Parameters
H20
(12)
(12)
X
n
X
X
n
nn
X
(12)
n
n
(12)
nn
X
(12)
(12)
n
n
X
(12)
C
X
X
X
n
X
X
n
(15)
X
X
n
n
n
X
(13)
X
X
(10)
n
(2)
X
H
(7)
(7)
X
(8)
n
(7)
(8)
(14)
(7)
(7)
n
(9)
(7)
(14)
(7)
(7)
(7)
(10)
n
(2)
n
0
(7)
(7)
X
n
n
(7)
n
(14)
(7)
(7)
n
(9)
(7)
(14)
(7)
(7)
(7)
n
(11)
(2)
n
Cl
X
X
X
n
X
X
n
(14)
X
X
n
X
X
(14)
(13)
X
X
n
n
•
(2)
X
S
X
X
X
n
X
X
n
(14)
X
X
n
X
X
(14)
(13)
X
X
n
n
(2)
X
PCB
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
(15)
X
X
n
n
n
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
• Ultimate analysis includes carbon, hydrogen, nitrogen, oxygen. FT —
PCDD/
PCDF
X
X
X
n
X
X
n
(15)
X
X
n
n
n
X
X
X
X
n
n
X
X
- neglecb
PCE
X
X
X
X
X
nn
X
(15)
nn
nn
nn
n
n
X
X
X
X
x
X
X
X
T~~^
HCB
nn
nn
nn
x
X
X
x
(15)
X
X
n
n
x
X
x
x
x
X
x
nn
Metals
x
X
x
n
x
x
n
(14)
X
x
X
x
x
(14)
(13)
X
X
n
n
x
x
< r t — •*• — — —• — — »| »jwiw^vii| niuvgwii| vnjgviii
(2) - Used combustion gas CO, 02, C02, S02, NOx, H20, and THC analyses. nn
(3) • Used density of water 62.4 Ibm/cf (based on observations in field) x
(4) - Used ideal gas law.
(5) -Used density of tin 358 Ibm/cf.
(6) -Used density of ash 137.3 Ibm/cf.
(7) - Used moisture content, and hydrogen and oxygen content of water 11%H and 89%0.
(8) -100% hydrogen.
(9) -Used oxygen and hydrogen content of NaOH.
(10) - Used carbon and hydrogen content of C3H8.
(11) • Used oxygen content of air.
(12) - Assumed to be 100% water.
(13) - Not analyzed because no sample available (sample used for critical analytes).
(14) - No mass balance conducted.
(15) • Determined by mass balance around TDU.
• not needed for compulations
•analyzed
5-6
-------
analyzing each stream directly. However, some concentrations and densities were estimated using the
ideal gas law, assumed densities, or assumed or measured stream compositions. Notes in Table 5-2
provide the specific estimation techniques for each stream and substance.
To ensure complete MBCs and accurate DIE and ORE computations, substances expected to be
present in significant amounts in each stream were quantified. The following substances were not
quantified: •
Scrubber caustic: C, PCB, PCDD/PCDF, PCE, HCB
Scrubber make-up water: c, PCB, PCDD/PCDF, PCE, HCB
Boiler propane : 0, Cl, S, PCDD/PCDF, metals
Hydrogen feed: C, 0, Cl, S, PCDD/PCDF, metals
Boiler combustion air: C, H, Cl, S, PCDD/PCDF, metals
Reactor grit: H, 0
Scrubber sludge: C, Cl, S, metals
Tankcondensate: H, 0
TDU molten bath: C, H, 0, Cl, S, PCB, PCDD/PCDF, HCB
The concentrations of these substances were assumed to be zero in their respective streams. For all
streams except the scrubber sludge and molten bath, these assumptions will not impact the MBC, DE,
and ORE calculations. However, the scrubber sludge may have high concentrations of carbon, chlorine,
sulfur, and metals. Because of the small amount of scrubber sludge generated, only critical substances
(PCB, PCDD/PCDF, PCE, and HCB) could be quantified. The molten bath matrix limited quantification
to metals. However, residual organics may remain after the test is complete.
While the TDU off-gases were sampled and analyzed, these analyses were not used to evaluate the
DRE and DE for the reactor control volume for Condition 2. In general, the confidence in the TDU off-gas
sampling procedures was low because of the difficulty in obtaining a representative sample. In addition,
many of the target analyte detections were well above the linear calibration range of the instruments.
Under these conditions, the accuracy of laboratory analyses is poor. The carbon, PCB, PCDD/PCDF,
PCE, and HCB gas emission rates from the TDU were based on a mass balance around the TDU which
included the contaminated soil, treated soil, and quench tank streams.
5-7
-------
MBC, DE, and ORE Equations—
In general, the computation of MBC, DE, and ORE involves the calculation of either the mass rate or
mass of each substance entering, exiting, or accumulating in the system. Mass rate of a particular
substance is simply the product of the total process stream rate and substance concentration, while mass
is the product of the total process stream mass and substance concentration. Because different
components of the reduction process did not operate simultaneously, the ORE, DE, and MBC were
based on mass instead of mass rates.
The non-simultaneous operation was particularly apparent during Condition 3, where the reactor
gases were stored in a tank and then burned in the boiler after the tank was filled. In general, the time
required to fill the tank was much shorter than the time required to empty the tank. For example, during
Condition 3 Run 3, only 150 minutes were required to fill the tank while 1,400 minutes were required to
empty the tank. The impact of this lag in processing the reformed gas is explained below. The reformed
gas contains products of incomplete reduction (PIRs) which undergo further reaction during the
combustion step in the boiler. Partially combusted PIRs are emitted from the boiler stack. Emissions from
the ELI process are not completely characterized until the stored reactor gases have been processed. A
DRE based on the rates of the boiler stack emissions would indicate greater destruction than actually
occurred.
The MBC, DE, and DRE computations also were based on total mass because of the number of
streams that were measured as total quantities. Only the boiler propane, combustion air, and flue gas
were measured as rates. These rates were converted to quantities using the total process time for
Conditions 1 and 2 and the total time to empty the reformed gas tank for Condition 3. Using the total mass
for each substance in each stream, MBC, DE and DRE were computed as discussed below.
MBC fortotal mass of a particular substance is defined as the deviation from perfect closure as follows:
MBC = inn f (total mass in '"Put streams) • (total mass in output streams)
1/2[(tota! mass in input streams) + (total mass in ouput streams)]
The MBC is zero for perfect closure (i.e. inputs are equal to outputs). If MBC is negative, the outputs are
greater than the inputs. This expresses the deviation from perfect closure. The average of the total input
and total output mass is used since the measurement uncertainty is similar for input and output streams.
5-8
-------
The ORE is defined as follows:
L _ (total substance mass at the boiler stack)>
\ (total substance mass in input streams) ,
The ORE indicates the quantity of a substance input to the system which does not exit the system by the
stack. The ORE does not necessarily indicate that the substance was destroyed.
The DE of a particular substance is defined as follows:
( (total substance mass in output streams)']
V (total substance mass in input streams) J
The DE indicates the amount of a substance input to the system which is destroyed in the system.
Detection Limits—
To provide a conservative evaluation of the ELI process, several key assumptions were made for the
treatment of data below the detection limit and interpolating condition-composite concentrations to
estimate individual run concentrations. In general, if the concentration of a substance was not detected, a
value between zero and the detection limit was used to estimate emissions. To estimate the DE and
ORE, the most conservative approach is to use zero for the detection limit for input streams and the full
detection limit for output streams. For MBC computations, however, ft is best to assume the full
detection limit on both the input and output streams. In summary:
• For the DE and ORE calculations, detection limits for the input streams were set to zero while the
full value of the detection limit was used for the output streams.
« For the MBC calculations, the full value of the detection limit was used for both input and output
streams.
Interpolating Composite Concentrations to Determine Run Concentrations—
Since DE calculations were required for each run, conservative assumptions were adopted for
interpolating condition-composite concentrations to estimate individual run concentrations. If the condition
concentration was a composite of three runs, the estimated concentration for each run was three times.the
condition concentration. This assumes that the condition-composite concentration was a result of one
5-9
-------
sampte whose concentration was three times the composite concentration and two sampfes with zero
concentrations. Since it is not known which sample had the high concentration, the high concentration is
applied to each of the samples or runs. This procedure is conservative since it is not likely that all of the
material would have accumulated over a single run in a continuous process. It is more likely that some
amounts of material would have accumulated over each run. However, the objective of the organic
destruction computations was to provide a conservative process evaluation. The condition-to-run
interpolating procedure described above was only applied to the following output streams for the DE
computations:
Reactor grit: PCDD/PCDF, PCB, HCB, PCE
Scrubber sludge: PCDD/PCDF, PCB (Condition 2 and Condition 3 Run 3 only), HCB, PCE
Scrubber decant: PCDD/PCDF, PCB, HCB, PCE (Condition 3 only)
Tank condensate: PCDD/PCDF, PCB (Condition 3 Run 2 and Condition 3 Run 3 only)
The interpolating procedure did not affect the ORE computations because the stack gas was the only
output and a sample of this stream was analyzed for each run. The MBC computations were not affected
because the calculations were performed on a condition basis and estimating procedures were not
required. It should be noted that the test program was designed with this approach in mind. Spiking
quantities, sample quantities, and method detection limits commensurate with the project objectives were
selected accordingly. In summary:
. • For the DE computations, output stream condition-composite concentrations were multiplied by 3
or 2, depending on the number of runs combined to estimate the run concentrations. For the
input streams, run concentrations were assumed to equal the condition-composite concentration.
o No interpolating procedures were necessary for the MBC or DRE calculations.
"Bost Caso" Analysis-
While the calculation procedures described above provide conservative or "worst case" estimates of
the organic destruction potential, ft also is useful to determine "best case" DRE and DEs. To this end,
DRE and DEs also were computed assuming the values of undetected analytes were zero. In addition,
for composite streams the estimated run values were assumed to equal the composite value.
Computing both worst and best case DE and DREs provides a range in which the true destruction
potential of the unit lies.
&-10
-------
Mass Balance Results
MBCs for the process streams, trace metals, and major elements including carbon, chlorine,
hydrogen, oxygen, and sulfur, are shown in Table 5-3 and Table 5-4. These tables also show primary
input and output streams for each condition. The MBC objective was ±50 percent for the process
streams and elements. The process and major element MBCs were excellent. In general, the trace
metal mass balance was not as successful due to the low levels of metals present and unquantifiable
sources such as metal pipes, refractory linings in the reactor and ducts, and paint in the scrubber tank.
However, the trace metals mass balance did provide very useful information on the partitioning of rnetals
within the reduction process.
Overall Process Mass Balance-
As shown in Table 5-3, the process MBC of total mass entering and leaving the process was well
within the objective of ±50 percent for all runs. For all runs except Condition 1 Run 2, the MBC was less
than ±10 percent. This excellent closure indicates that the process masses are accurate; therefore,
substance emission rates and masses based on these data are reliable, provided the measured
substance concentrations also are accurate.
Key streams were identified by comparing the magnitudes of the process flows. For all test
conditions, the bulk of the boiler stack gases resulted from the boiler combustion air, as expected.
During Condition 1 and 3, another key mass flow was the transfer of mass from the waste water to the
scrubber decant water. The scrubber make-up water and caustic also made significant contributions to the
scrubber decant water for Condition 3. During Condition 2 the contaminated soil passed into the TDU,
received treatment, and exited into the quench tank. There was little change in the overall mass of the
soil.
Major Element Mass Balance-
As shown in Table 5-3,12 out of 15 of the major element MBCs for the complete system (see Figure
5-1) satisfy the objectives. Only the MBCs for chlorine in Condition 2, hydrogen in Condition 1, and sulfur
in Condition 3 are outside the objective of ±50 percent. The hydrogen balance is very close to the
objective. However, the sulfur and chlorine balances indicate that all of the input mass was not accounted
for in the output streams for these elements. Due to the number of significant streams in the chlorine
and sulfur mass balance it is difficult to definitively identify the cause of the incomplete MBCs.
However, one or more of the following considerations may be responsible:
5-11
-------
TABLE 5-3. PROCESS AND MAJOR ELEMENT MASS BALANCE SUMMARY
Substance
Process
Carbon
Chlorine
Hydrogen
Oxygen
Sulfur
Mass balance closure8 (%)
4.3
-2.1
Condition 1
20.1
-4.3 *
-(41)
6.67
b
-53.8
17.6
29.1
Condition 2
9.1
0.3
6.1
(26)
98
14.8
9.37
b
-44.9
3.9
14.7
Condition 3
3.0
b
-0.5
1.1
(98)
b
-8.6
b
-6.66
129
Key streams
Condttonl
input
351
SS9
555™
(SS2)
ssi
SS2
SSI
SS1
SS9
ssi
SS2
5513"
SS16
5315
(SS14)
SS13
SS18
SS22
3315
SST3-
SS16
SSiiT
SS16
SS18
SS22
CondHJon2
input
™55T~
SS3
SS4
SS9
556
(SS19)
SS3
ssr"
SS1
SS9
SS3
ouput
"SSTo-
SS13
SS16
5515
(SS14)
3310
SS13
SS22
SS24
SS13
SS13
SS16
SSIo
SS13
SS16
SS22
Conditions
"TnpuT"
551
SS4
SS5
SS9
555
(SS2)
332
SSi
SS5
SS6
5SS
SS9
332
SupuT
5515
SS16
"S516-
(SS14)
SS13
SS22
§513
SS16
SSi3
SS16
3316
SS18
SS22
ro
Balance includes complete system unless noted. See Figure 5-1.
Negative balance indicates output greater than input.
() Balance for reactor control volume. See Figure 5-2.
SS1
SS2
SS3
SS4
SS5
SS6
SS7
SS9
SS10
SS11
- Waste water
- Waste oil
- Contaminated soil
— Scrubber caustic
- Scrubber make-up water
- Propane
- Hydrogen
- Boiler combustion air
- Treated soil
— Reactor grit
SS12 - Scrubber sludge
SS13 - Scrubber decant
SS14 - Reformed gas
SS 15 - Tank condensate
SS 16 - Boiler stack gas
SS18 - Heat exchanger residue
SS2O - TDU molten bath
SS22 - Scrubber liquor
SS24 - TDU quench water
-------
TABLE 5-4. TRACE METAL MASS BALANCE SUMMARY a
Substance
Antimony
Arsenic
Sanum
Beryllium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Phosphorus
Selenium
UN
Silver
Thallium
line
a ~ . . .
Mass balance (%) c
d
d
47.1
d
d
b
•71.9
175
165
27.6
d
-117b
140
d
d
d
d
b
-94.7
•••^••••••••i
d
32
1.31
30.8
-37.5b
-150 b
21.1
109.6
30.2
5.25
-132 b
-89 b
d
d
29.9
-196 b
-16.3 b
i^mmmmmm^mm
d
d
77.4
d
138
•71 Rb
-64.9 b
32
b
-153
82.9
b
-136
163
d
d
d
•23.6 b
-139 b
Condlion 1
-3—
d
SS1
SS2
d
d
552'
552"
SS4
SS22
SS2
SS1
SS22
d"""
SS2
SS2
d
d
d
d
SS1
SS2
OutpuT
d
SS18
d
d
5522"
5513-
SS13
SS16
SS18
d ~
SS13
SS22
SS22
d
d
d
d
SS13
SS18
SS22
Condit on 2
Inpui
— a—
SS3
553
SS3
SS3
553
553
SS3
SS20
SS3
553
SS3
SS3
d
d
SS3
SS3
SS3
Ouput
d
SS10
SS10
SS10
SS10
5510
SS20
5510
SS10
SS10
5510
SS10
SS20
SS10
d
d
SS10
SS10
5S10
Input
d
d
SS1
SS2
d
SS2
552
552
SS4
SS2
SS1
SS18
552"
SS2
SS2
d
d
d
552
SS2
Ouput
d"""
SS18
SS22
d
SS16
SS22
5522
"5SST
SS22
SS22 '
SS13
SS22
SS22
(T"
d
"~53SF
~~5§TF
SS22
•* Negative balance indicates output greater than input.
c Acceptance limit 4/-50
Most emission data below detection limit.
SS1
SS2
SS3
SS4
SS5
SS6
SS7
SS9
SS10.
- Waste water
-Waste oil
- Contaminated soil
-Lime water
- Scrubber make-up water
-Propane
- Hydrogen
-Boiler combustion air
-Treated soil
SS11 -Reactor grit
SS12 -Scrubber sludge
SS13 - Scrubber decant
SS15 -Tankcondensate
SS16 -Boiler stack gas
SS18 - Heat exchanger residue
SS20 -TDU molten bath
SS22 • Scrubber liquor
SS24 • TDU quench water
5-13
-------
« Unaccounted for output streams-The scrubber sludge was not analyzed for chlorine and
hydrogen during any of the conditions. If this was the reason, it is unlikely that the balances for
these elements in Conditions 1 and 3 would have been complete. During Condition 2, the
molten bath was not analyzed for chlorine. If chlorine was present, this may represent a
significant stream, especially since the TDU was not operating effectively during Condition 2 Run
1- . .
• Unrepresentative sampling—For Condition 2, a large quantity of heterogenous treated soil was
generated; a representative sample may not have been collected.
A carbon balance also was conducted for the reactor control volume (see Figure 5-2). Conditions 1
and 2 satisfy the reactor carbon MBC objective. However, for Condition 3 the reactor MBC objective
was not satisfied. For this condition, only one-third of the carbon entering the reactor was accounted for in
the outputs. No definitive reason for the poor reactor carbon balance for Condition 3 could be identified.
Poor recovery of the sooty carbonaceous material noted in some of the samples and in the system for
this condition may have contributed to poor reactor carbon MBC.
As part of the mass balance evaluation, major process streams and flows were identified for each
major element. Appendix 3 provides graphs which illustrate the partitioning of the major elements.
Table 5-3 summarizes the significant streams for each condition. Key observations from the partitioning
analysis are summarized below for each major element.
9 Carbon—For the complete system, the bulk of the stack gas carbon came from the propane, as
expected. The waste oil and contaminated soil also were significant sources. Since a key object
of the study was to determine the fate of the waste carbon in the reactor, a carbon balance was
conducted from the reactor input to the reformed gas inlet of the boiler. Figure 5-3 illustrates the
mass of carbon at each input and output stream. The ratio of carbon in each input stream to the
total carbon input and the corresponding ratio for output streams also are provided in Figure 5-3.
While the overall MBC is not complete, the figure does illustrate the partitioning of the waste
carbon matter. For Condition 1 and 3 the waste oil was a major source of carbon to the reactor;
for Condition 2 the TDU off-gas was a major source. The TDU off-gas flow rate was determined
by mass balance around the TDU. For all three conditions, the major output source was the
reformed gas whose major components were methane, carbon monoxide, and carbon dioxide.
Toxic components measured in the reformed gas (including benzene, PAHs, and PCBs) were
not significant carbon sources for Condition 1,2, and 3. This observation, coupled with the fact
5-14
-------
Waste oil ——
*Carbon
Condition 1: 18.3 kg; 99.8%
Condition 2: na
Condition 3: 93.O kg; 99.98%
'Chlorine
Condition 1: 8.85 kg; 73.3%
Condition 2: na
Condition 3: 36.4 kg; 94.9%
Scrubber Caustic
•Carbon
Condition 1: na
Condition 2: na
Condition 3: na
'Chlorine
Condition 1:O.44kc
Condjtion 2: O.513I
Condition 3: 1.0 kg;:
Thermal desorber
off-gas
"Carbon
Condition 1: na
Condition^: 11.2kg; 1OO%
Condition 3: na
'Chlorine
Condition 1: na
Condition 2: 9.3O kg; 94.8%
Condition 3: na
Waste water — j
•Carbon
Condjtion 1: O.O3 kg; O.15%
Condition 2: na
Condition 3: O.O2 kg; O.O2%
•Chlorine
Condition 1: 2.79 kg; 23.1%
Condition 2: na
Condition 3: O.934 kg; 2.43%
Heat
Exchanger
Reactor
Scrubber
1
T
Reactor grit
'Carbon
Condition 1: O.O77 kg; O.28%
Condition 2: O.OO9 kg; O.12%
Condition 3: O.O4 kg; O.12%
'Chlorine
Condition 1: O.OO9 kg; O.OS%
Condition 2: O.OO9 kg; O.5%
Condition 3: O.OO5 kg; O.O1%
Scrubber decent water and sludge
'Carbon
Condition 1: 0.17 kg; O.61%
Condition 2: O.O54 kg; o.62%
Condition 3: O.O4 kg; O.11%
'Chlorine
Condition 1: 9.34 kg; 82.6%
Condition 2: 1.7kg; 99.4%
Condition 3: 37.3 kg; 96.8%
Reformed gas
•Carbon
Condition 1: 28.Okg;99.O%
Condition 2:8.S7 kg; 99.3%
Condition 3: 31.7kg; 99.6%
•Chlorine
Condition 1: .OO2 kg; O.O2%
Condition 2: .OO3 kg; O.15%
Condition 3: .OO9 kg; O.02%
Heat Exchanger
•Carbon
Condition 1: O.O2 kg; O.O6%
Condition 2: na
Condition 3: O.O4 kg; O.13%
'Chlorine
Condition 1:2.Okg;17.3%
Condition 2: na
Condition 3: 1.2 kg; 3.2%
Italic bold - key streams
First number - total mass over condition
Second number - percent of input or output
Figure 5-3. Reactor carbon and chlorine mass balance and partitioning.
-------
that the waste oil PCB content was approximately 25 percent, indicates that RGBs were
effectively reduced by the process for Condition 1 and Condition 3. While the contaminated soil
PCB content was much lower than the waste oil, good conversion of these PCBs to methane,
carbon monoxide, and carbon dioxide was achieved during Condition 2.
• Chlorine—Figure 5-3 also illustrates the mass of chlorine and the partitioning of chlorine at each
reactor stream. For both Condition 1 and 3, chlorine entered the system with the waste oil and
PCE spike; ft exited the system in the scrubber blowdown tank and decant water. For Condition
2, HCB was the main source of chlorine in the input while the TDU quench water, treated soil,
scrubber decant water, and scrubber liquor were the main output streams.
• Sulfur—For both Condition 1 and Condition 3, sulfur entered the system with the waste oil and
exited the system in the scrubber liquor and decant water, and the heat exchanger residue. For
Condition 2 the contaminated soil was the input source while the treated soil was the output
source. Very little transfer of the sulfur from the contaminated soil to the reactor occurred.
• Hydrogen—Since the hydrogen balance included water, the hydrogen flowed from the waste
water to the scrubber decant water for all three conditions. The make-up water was also a key
source for Condition 3.
• Oxygen—For Condition 1, 2 and 3, the bulk of the stack gas oxygen resulted from the
combustion air, as expected. During Condition 1,2 and 3 another key oxygen mass flow was the
transfer of mass from the waste water to the scrubber decant water. The scrubber make-up
water also significantly contributed to the scrubber decant water for Condition 3.
Trace Metals Mass Balance-
As shown in Table 5-4,13 out of 33 trace metal MBCs satisfy the stated objectives. MBCs that were
based only on data below the detection limit are not compared to the MBC objective. Condition 2 had
the best closure of the three conditions, with 9 out of 14 metals meeting the MBC objective. It produced
better closures because the metals concentrations in the contaminated soil and treated soil, which were
the main input and output streams for most of the metals, were relatively high (compared to the other
wastes) and the flow rate of these streams was also high. The metals in Condition 2 entered the TDU
with the contaminated soil and exited with the treated soil. The reduced number of variables in the
Condition 2 computations provided better MBCs. For Conditions 1 and 3, however, several streams
had significant metals concentrations relative to the total system throughput. Therefore, the complexity of
5-16
-------
the analysis increased, increasing the uncertainty of the MBCs. Potential causes for some of the
incomplete MBCs are:
• Unaccounted-for streams—Some of the positive metal MBCs (input greater than output) may
have been improved if the scrubber sludge had been analyzed for metals. Although only a small
quantity of scrubber sludge was collected, the metal concentrations may have been high, resulting
in a significant metal output mass.
Some potential sources of metals were not quantified due to the difficulty obtaining
representative samples—i.e., contributions from the ceramic reactor core, metal process pipes,
and paint on the scrubber tank surfaces. These potential sources may have resulted in the
negative MBCs for chromium, nickel, copper (Condition 3 only), zinc, and manganese (Condition
3 only). Table 5-5 compares the distribution of metals in the earth's crust to key streams within
the process. The only stream which has a comparable distribution is the reactor grit. This is
reasonable, since loses from the reactor core would have collected in the reactor grit. Some
maten'al also may have been entrained and collected in the scrubber, resulting in negative MBCs
for some metals. Table 5-5 clearly shows that metals with higher concentrations in the earth's crust
also had negative MBCs. Only barium and phosphorus did not have negative MBCs. These
elements, however, had significant sources within the system which may have reduced the impact
of entrained material from the reactor. Losses from metallic and painted surfaces in the system
also may have impacted the chromium and nickel results.
• TDU molten bath sampling—Due to the configuration of the TDU it was not practical to
accurately determine the weight of molten metal before and after the Condition 2 runs.
Therefore, ft was assumed that the mass of metal in the bath remained constant throughout the
program. The quantity of metal in the bath, however, did change during the tests and the
contribution was not reflected in the MBC computations for tin. This resulted in the high negative
MBC for tin in Condition 2. The difficulty in getting representative molten bath samples also
may have contributed to the poor MBCs for chromium, nickel, and lead for Condition 2.
• Condition 1 Run 1 scrubber malfunction—During Condition 1 Run 1 the scrubber was not
properly setup which may have resulted in the unusual metal capture efficiencies which occurred.
For example, no chromium or nickel was detected in the scrubber liquor; copper, lead,
manganese, mercury, zinc, and barium decreased significantly in the scrubber tank liquor during
the run. Typically each of these elements would collect over the period of a run as the reactor
5-17
-------
TABLE 5-5. COMPARISON OF EARTH CRUST ELEMENT DISTRIBUTION TO
ELI REDUCTION PROCESS STREAM ELEMENT DISTRIBUTIONS
Substance
P
Mn*
Ba
Cr*
Zn*
Ni*
Cu*
Pb
Be
As
Hg
Cd
Se
Earth
40.1
34.0
8.5
6.8
4.5
2.7
2.4
0.5
0.2
0.2
0.0.
0.0
0.0
Distribution (%)
Reactor
grit
36.2
36.8
3.9
4.4
3.9
7.4
3.1
1.4
0.0
2.8
0.0
0.1
0.0
Waste
oil
52.5
0.0
1.2
3.1
19.2
0.8
1.6
21.4
0.0
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.0
Contaminated
soil
27.0
0.0
4.7
3.2
15.4
2.8
4.2
11.6
0.0
0.9
8.6
0.0
21.5
Waste
water
11.8
7.9
34.6
3.9
23.6
3.9
2.4
3.9
0.0
7.9
0.0
0.0
0.0
Scrubber
liquor
2.8
13.0
0.8
3.4
57.9
3.4
5.3
11.4
0.0
1.9
0.0
0.0
0.0
tiemems witn.greater output than input (copper and manganese Condition 3 only)
off-gases were processed. By neglecting Condition 1 Run 1 the MBC is improved for barium,
cadmium, lead, manganese, and mercury. The other elements do not improve because the
effect of the TDU molten bath source discussed above, is greater without the Condition 1 Run 1
data.
• Data close to the detection limit—The cadmium and mercury detections for Condition 3 the
waste oil are very close to the detection limit, which may have caused the poor MBCs for these
metals in Condition 3. Generally, as the sample detections approach the detection limit, the
uncertainty of the data increases.
Partitioning of Trace Metals-
Even though many of the MBCs in Table 5-4 were not complete, the partitioning information-i.e.,
the paths of metals entering and leaving the system-is still valid and important. The partitioning results
for each element are presented graphically in the appendices. The partitioning behavior for elements
which were detected can be summarized as follows:
• Contaminated soil to treated soil (Condition 2 only)-arsenic, barium, beryllium, cadmium,
chromium, copper, lead, manganese, mercury, nickel, phosphorus, thallium, and zinc.
5-18
-------
« Waste water to heat exchanger residue (Condition 1 only)—manganese.
• Waste oil to scrubber (Conditions 1 and 3 only)-chromium, copper, lead, mercury, nickel,
phosphorus, and tin.
• Waste water to heat exchanger residue and waste oil to scrubber (Condition 1 and 3
only): barium, and zinc.
Internal sources such as the ceramic reactor core and metals pipes also may be significant sources for
some metals.
Organic Destruction
A key objective of this project evaluated the efficiency of the process in destroying several critical
organics including PCBs, HCB, and PCE. Another goal of the project was to determine if products of
incomplete reduction (PIR), such as PCDD/PCDF, could be formed as by-products. To evaluate organic
destruction potential, PCBs, PCE and HCB were introduced to the system at high levels. The amounts
of these compounds in each of the output streams were then measured, enabling calculation of DE and
ORE. To evaluate the formation potential of PCDD/PCDF, the input and output masses of these
substances were measured in key process streams. Formation was quantified by computing the DE for
each test run. A DE was greater than zero indicates no net formation of PCDD/PCDF..
Table 5-6 summarizes worst case or conservative DEs and DREs for each of the target substances.
It also lists the primary input and output streams. Appendix 3 contains the substance flow rates and
total masses for each process stream and run. Partitioning results which indicate the paths of these
organic substances in and out of the system are presented graphically in the appendices. Overall, the
process was a very effective destructor of PCBs, PCE and HCB; there was no net formation of
PCDD/PCDF. All of the objectives were satisfied except for the PCB DRE for Condition 2 Run 2 and
the HCB DE for Condition 2 Run 1. These failures were due in part to the performance of the TDU and
possible interferences in the boiler analyses.
PCB Destruction-
One of the critical objectives for the project was to achieve a 99.9999 percent PCB DRE for each run
(based on mono- through deca- PCB congeners in the input and output streams). Seven out of eight
runs achieved this objective at worst case or conservative conditions (i.e., full detection limit for
5-19
-------
TABLE 5-6. SUMMARY OF PCB, PCE, HCB, AND PCDD/PCDF DESTRUCTION
Substance
BBffffSBSSBSEBBBB
Target
Condition 1
Condition 2
Condition 3
Run1
Run 2
Run 3
Key input
streams
Key output
streams
Run1
Run 2
Key Input
streams
Key output
streams
Run1
Run 2
Run 3
Key input
streams
99.9999
99.99998
99.999997
99.99999
SS2'
SS16
99.99996
99.997
SS3
SS16
99.99996
99.99996
99.999996
SS2
SS16
Destruction Efficiencv
PCE
>99.99
99.997
99.9987
99.993
SS2b
SS13C
NA
NA
NA
NA
99.9987
99.998
99.996
SS2b
SS13
SS15
SS16
HCB
>99.99
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
72.13
99.998
SS3d
SS10
SS12
SS13C
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Dioxin
>0
70.78
68.24
63.05
SS2
SS12
42.5
99.45
883d
SS10
SS12
89.45
98.36
97.61
SS2
SS12
SS22
Furan
>0
99.93
99.92
99.91
SS2
SS12
SS13C
54.6
98.12
SS3d
ssio
SS12
99.92
99.988
99.98
SS2
SS12
SS22
a - ORE and DE based on complete system (see Figure 5-1). DREs and DEs based on
the reactor control volume (see Figure 5-2) are included in Tables 5-7,8, and 9.
b-SS2spike.
c - Most emission data below detection limit.
d-SS3 spike
Nondetects = detection limit; run results based on condition composite = composite
value times the number of runs composited.
Less conservative (Nondetects = zero; run results based on condition
composite=composite value) DE and DREs are provided in Tables 5-7,8, and 9
SS2 -Waste oil
SS3 - - Contaminated soil
SS10 -Treated soil
SS12 -Scrubber sludge
SS13 -Scrubber decant
SS15 -Tankcondensate
SS16 -Boiler stack gas
SS22 - Scrubber blowdown
5-20
-------
rtondetected substances and run values equal to three times the composite value for composite
samples) as shown in Table 5-6. The main input streams were waste oil for Conditions 1 and 3 and the
contaminated soil for Condition 2. By definition, the stack gas was the only output stream considered for
ORE. From 30 to 96 percent of the total PCB mass at the stack was detected in each run. As a result,
the PCB DREs provided in Table 5-6 are conservative because the full value of the detection limit was
used for congeners that were not detected.
For Condition 2 Run 2, the ORE for the complete system was 99.997. To determine if the TDU or
boiler impacted the ORE, it was also calculated without these components. Figure 5-2 (presented earlier)
illustrates the control volume considered, termed the reactor control volume. For this control volume, the
ORE is based on the TDU off-gas as the primary input and the reformed gas after scrubbing as the
primary output. The reactor control volume ORE is 99.9999 percent, as shown in Table 5-7. Since the
PCB input to the complete system and reactor are on the same order of magnitude, elimination of the
TDU from the calculation has little effect on the ORE value. Therefore, either PCBs had to be formed in
the boiler or were present at higher levels in the combustion air. It is unlikely that PCBs were formed in
the boiler because:
• The boiler provides high flame temperatures (>1300°C) to destroy PCBs or inhibit their
formation; and
• Over 99 percent of the chlorine has been removed in the scrubber, and trace amounts of chlorine
that occur in the fuel gas should react with hydrogen to form HCI. This leaves little chlorine to
form PCB.
An alternative hypothesis is that the reduced DRE may have resulted from PCBs in the combustion
air bypassing the flame. After examination of the data, it was found that the combustion air PCB input
mass and concentration were approximately equal to the stack gas PCB output mass and concentration.
However, it is unlikely that the combustion air and stack gas have the same concentration, A final
possibility is that both samples may have been contaminated. Review of the field and analytical
procedures and QC results did not yield any conclusive evidence of contamination or analytical
interferences. Even if contamination of the stack and combustion air samples did not occur, the high
amount of PCBs found in the combustion air are sufficient to invalidate the PCB emission and system
DRE data for this run.
5-21
-------
TABLE 5-7. DESTRUCTION OF PCB - SYSTEM EVALUATION
Condition
Condition 1
Condition 2
Condition 3
Run
Run1
Run 2
Run3
Run 1
Run 2
Run 1
Run 2
Run 3
Control volume
Complete system
Reactor
Complete system
Reactor
Complete system
Reactor
Complete system
Reactor and boiler
Reactor
Complete system
Reactor and boiler
Reactor
Complete system
Reactor
Complete system
Reactor
Complete system
Reactor
ORE (%)
Best Case9
99.9999899
100 c
99.999998
99.99998
99.999992
99.9999986
99.999988
99.999988
99.99997
99.997
99.997
99.99992
99.99996
99.999998
99.99996
99.99996
99.9999986
99.99999899
Worst Case b
99.99998
99.999998
99.999997
99.99998
99.99999
99.999998
99.99996
99.99996
99.99996
99.997
99.997
99.99991
99.99996
99.999997
99.99996
99.99996
99.999996
99.9999987
DE (%)
Best Case a
99.989
99.989
99.996
99.995
99.998
99.998
93.5
99.998
99.998
98.98
99.991
99.994
99.9998
99.9998
99.99995
99.99994
99.99997
99.99997
99.95
99.95
99.97
99.97
99.97
99.97
93.5
99.96
99.96
98.87
99.88
99.88
99.998
99.998
99.998
99.998
99.998
99 99ft
Nondetects = zero; run results based on condition composite = composite value.
Nondetects = detection limit; run results based on condition composite = composite value times the number of runs composited
c No detections in output stream.
V
K
-------
ta an effort to better understand the ELI reduction process's ability to destroy PCBs, DEs and DREs
were computed for the complete system, with and without the boiler and TDU, at best and worst case
conditions (Table 5-7}.
• Complete system DE (all conditions)-The complete system includes the reactor, boiler, and
TDU (Condition 2 only) as shown in Figure 5-1. Condition 3 provided the best destruction of
PCBs, while Condition 2 provided the least. For the worst case, only Condition 3 had 99.99
percent DE, which was the objective established for tracer compounds added to the system. For
the best case, Condition 1 Runs 2 and 3 also had >99.99 percent DE. For Condition 2, the
contaminated soil was the main PCB input stream and for Conditions 1 and 3 the waste oil was
the main PCB input stream. Assuming worst case conditions, key output streams listed in order
of decreasing magnitude and indicating detection of PCBs were: Condition 1—the reactor grit
(detected), scrubber decant (not detected), and scrubber sludge (some detections); Condition
2—treated soil (detected), scrubber decant (not detected), and scrubber sludge (some
detections); and Condition 3—scrubber decant (some detections), scrubber sludge (some
detections), tank condensate (some detections), and scrubber tank liquor (detected). A complete
listing of PCB process masses and rates is provided in the appendices.
o Reactor and boiler DE (Condition 2)—One of the key PCB output streams for the complete
system for Condition 2 was the treated soil. This indicated that the TDU did not effectively
transfer PCBs to the reactor for reduction. To evaluate the reactor, not the TDU, the PCB input
mass to the reactor from the TDU for Condition 2 was determined by difference between the
treated soil output and contaminated soil input. As expected the reactor and boiler provided
destruction comparable to the other conditions (Table 5-7). This suggests that if PCBs could be
effectively removed from the contaminated soil in the TDU, the reactor should achieve DE similar
to that achieved with waste oil feed.
« Reactor process DE (all conditions)—To determine the relative contributions of the reduction
process and the boiler to overall system PCB DE, DEs were computed using the reformed gas
PCB content and mass for each run (see Figure 5-2). Table 5-7 shows that similar destruction of
PCBs could be obtained without the boiler. Since most of the undestroyed PCBs partition to
residual streams other than the reformed gas, any contribution of the boiler to the PCB DE is
expected to be small.
5-23
-------
Due to differing toxicities of various PCB congeners, it is important to examine the impact of the
reduction process on each congener. Figure 5-4 shows the congener distribution for total input and total
output PCB streams for the reactor control volume. The distributions were generated by dividing the
sum of each congener across all input or output streams by the total PCB input or output, respectively.
Only detected congeners were considered and the reactor grit was excluded from the computation.
Figure 5-4 clearly shows that the total PCB input and output masses used to compute the DEs were
composed mainly of tri-, tetra-, and penta- congeners. Furthermore, there appears to be a shift from
tetra-and penta-to tri-, di-, and mono-congeners.
HCB and PCE Destruction—
To evaluate the destruction capabilities of the ELI process for difficuH-tc-destroy substances, HCB
and PCE were added to the waste feeds for Condition 2 and Conditions 1 and 3, respectively. The
objective was to achieve 99.99 percent DE for each run. Seven out of eight runs achieved this objective
at worst case or conservative conditions, as shown in Table 5-8. The results show:
• PCE DE, Condition 1—The scrubber decant was the key PCE output stream for Condition 1.
Because the scrubber decant PCE concentration was based on detection limits, the Condition 1
PCE DEs are at the tower minimum bound.
• HCB DE, Condition 2—The treated soil contained a significant amount of HCB and was the main
HCB output stream for Condition 2 Run 1. This indicates that the TDU did not. effectively desorb
HCB from the contaminated soil. For Condition 2 Run 2, the scrubber sludge and decant water
were the main output streams. Since the scrubber sludge had detectable levels of HCB, the
Condition 2 Run 2 DE is not an estimated amount. It provides an actual evaluation of the reactor
process destruction potential.
• PCE DE, Condition 3—The scrubber sludge, decant water, and tank condensate were the main
PCE output streams for Condition 3. All of the PCE concentrations in these streams were
detected at similar levels.
The HCB DE of 72.13 percent for Condition 2 Run 1 failed to meet the objective of 99.99 percent.
The HCB input mass to the reactor for Condition 2 Run 1 was estimated by difference between the
mass in the treated soil and spiked contaminated soil. Table 5-8 shows that across the reactor alone,
HCB DE during the soil condition and the PCE DE during the waste oil condition were similar. This
confirms that the failure to meet the DE objective for Condition 2 Run 1 was caused by the
5-24
-------
50
45-
40-
35-
30-
25-
20-
15-j
10-
5-j
45-
40 -i
35 -j
30 -i
OC '
bO ™
•
20 ™
•
15-i
'
10 -i
5:
50-
45J
40^
35 -i
30 -I
25-
20 -i
15-i
"
10-i
0-:
•
n
/
\
m
i! I
m
1^
^
t
%
t
'<,
IX
r
',
BXy
Y
-
'\
Condlti
I
'',
«
Condlti
r
^
/
/
/
/
^ •
> •
|n
/ mV
\
V • /
1
Conditic
^
J
an1:V
B
3n2:S
)n3:W
B
Vaste'
iteSo
/asteC
Water
Is
)il
Mon Di Tri Tet Pen Hex Hep Oct Non
PCB Congener
(1) - Total mass of congener in all input or output streams normalized
by the total mass of all congeners in all input or output streams
Input streams
Output streams
Figure 5-4. PCB congener distributions (detected data only).
5-25
-------
TABLE 5-8. DESTRUCTION OF PCE AND HCB - SYSTEM EVALUATION
Substance
Perchloroethylene
Hexachlorobenzene
Perchloroethylene
Condition
Condition 1
Condition 2
Condition 3
Run
Run1
Run 2
Run 3
Run 1
Run 2
Run 1
Run 2
Run 3
Control Volume
Complete system
Reactor
Complete system
Reactor
Complete system
Reactor
Complete system
Reactor and boiler
Reactor
Complete system
Reactor and boiler
Reactor
Complete system
Reactor
Complete system
Reactor
Complete system
Reactor
DRE
a
Best Case
99.9997
c
100
99.9999
100 C
99.9998
99.99995
99.999992
99.999989
100°
100°
100°
100°
99.9994
99.988
99.9994
100°
99.998
99.97
%) DE (%)
b
Worst Case
99.9997
99.999992
99.9999
99.99997
99.9998
99.99995
99.999992
99.999989
99.999995
99.99997
99.99997
99.999992
99.9994
99.988
99.9994
99.999991
99.998
99.97
Best Case
99.9997
100 °
99.9999
1OO?
99.9998
99.99995
72.13
99.9996
99.9997
99.9994
99.9994
99.9994
99.99899
99.988
99.9987
99.9993
99.997
99.97
Nondetects = zero; run results based on condition composite = composite value.
b
Worst Case
99.997
99.997
99.9987
99.9988
99.993
99.993
72.13
99.99898
99.99898
99.998
99.998
99.998
99.9987
99.988
99.998
99.998
99.996
99.97
Nondetects = detection limit; run results based on condition composite = composite value times the number of runs composited.
c No detections in output stream.
-------
ineffectiveness of the TDU, not the performance of the reactor. The TDU effectively removed HCB
during Condition 2 Run 2.
The DE of PCE across the reactor control volume was less than 99.99 percent for Condition 3 Runs 1
and 3. The amount of PCE in the reformed gas was an order of magnitude greater than in the stack.
Although there were no project objectives for reactor DE, this does indicate that additional PCE
destruction took place in the boiler and that the project objective could not have been achieved without H.
It should be emphasized, however, that the DE of PCBs across the reactor control volume did exceed
99.99 percent for these same conditbns, as shown earlier. The low reactor DE for PCE could indicate that
operating conditions during Condition 3 are approaching the limits of the process.
\
Dioxin and Furan Destruction-
One of the objectives of the project was to determine if PCDD/PCDF would be formed in the ELI
reduction process. To evaluate the potential for formation, PCDD/PCDF were quantified in key input and
output streams. The DE was then computed for each run to determine if PCDD/PCDF were formed. As
shown in Table 5-6, the PCDD/PCDF DEs ranged from 42 to 99 and from 55 to 99.9, respectively. While
some of the DEs did not make 1 nine, they all were positive indicating net destruction for each run. Table
5-6 shows the key streams for each run. The key input stream for Condition 2 was the HCB spike. It
should be noted that the mass of dioxins and furans contained in the HCB spike was approximately 2
orders of magnitude greater than that in the contaminated soil.
In an effort to better understand the ELI reduction process's ability to destroy PCDD/PCDF, DEs and
DREs were computed for the complete system and with and without the boiler and the TDU at worst and
best case conditions as shown in Table 5-9. The PCDD/PCDF DEs for Condition 1 and Condition 3 were
not impacted by the choice of control volume. This indicates that the boiler has no impact on the DE for
PCDD/PCDF. Since most of the undestroyed PCDD/PCDF partition to residual streams other than the
reformed gas, any contribution of the boiler to the PCDD/PCDF DE is expected to be small. A
significant increase in the PCDD/PCDF DE was achieved by eliminating the TDU from Condition 2 Run 1.
This confirms that the low DE for Condition 2 Run 1 was caused by the inability of the TDU to clesorb
contaminants, not the performance of the reactor.
Due to differing toxictties of various PCDD/PCDF congeners, it is important to examine the impact of
the reactor process on the congeners as well as the totals. Figures 5-5 and 5-6 show the congener
distribution for total input and total output PCDD/PCDF streams for the reactor control volume. These
distributions were generated by dividing the sum of each PCDD/PCDF congener across all input or
5-27
-------
TABLE 5-9. DESTRUCTION OF DIOXINS AND FURANS - SYSTEM EVALUATION
Substance
Dioxin
Furan
Condition
Condition 1
Condition 2
Condition 3
Condition 1
Condition 2
Condition 3
Run
Run1
Run 2
Run3
Run 1
Run 2
Run 1
Run 2
Run 3
Run1
Run 2
Run 3
Run 1
Run 2
Run 1
Run 2
Run 3
Control volume
Complete system
Reactor
Complete system
Reactor
Complete system
Reactor
Complete system
Reactor and boiler
Reactor
Complete system
Reactor and boiler
Reactor
Complete system
Reactor
Complete system
Reactor
Complete system
Reactor
Complete system
Reactor
Complete system
Reactor
Complete system
Reactor
Complete system
Reactor and boiler
Reactor
Complete system
Reactor and boiler
Reactor
Complete system
Reactor
Complete system
teactor
Complete system
Reactor
ORE (%)
Best Case8
99.4
99.98
99.88
99.97
99.897
99.985
99.99995
99.99988
99.99998
99.99992
99.99992
99.999996
99.92
99.997
99.97
99.9996
99.95
99.996
99.993
99.9998
99.9995
99.9996
99.999987
99.9992
99.999895
99.9998
99.999995
99.99997
99.99997
99.99998
99.9996
99.99998
99.9995
99.9999989
99.99996
99.99999
Worst Case b
99.4
99.98
99.87
99.97
99.89
99.985
99.99995
99.99988
99.99998
99.99991
99.99991
99.999996
99.92
99.997
99.97
99.9996
99.94
99.996
99.993
99.9998
99.9995
99.9996
99.99996
99.9992
99.999895
99.9998
99.999991
99.99995
99.99995
99.99998
99.9996
99.99998
99.9995
99.9999985
99.99993
99.99999
DE (%)
Best Case"
91.77
92.37
91.83
91.92
90.54
9O.63
42.58
99.85
99.85
99.63
99.83
99.83
98.3
98.37
99.59
99.61
99.37
99.42
99.98
99.985
99.98
99.98
99.98
99.98
54.9
99.48
99.48
98.9
99.22
99.22
99.986
99.986
99.997
99.997
99.995
99.995
Worst Caseb
7O.78
71.38
68.24
68.34
63.05
63.14
42.51
99.7
99.7
99.5
99.7
99.7
89.45
89.52
98.36
98.39
97.61
97.66
99.93
99.93
99.92
99.92
99.91
99.91
54.6
98.95
98.95
98.1
98.43
98.43
99.92
99.92
99.988
99.988
99.98
99 9fl
Nondetects > zero; run results based on condition composite - composite value.
Nondetects - detection limit; run results based on condition composite - composite value ttmes the number of runs composited.
-------
Condition 1: Waste Water
TCDD PeCDD HxCDD HpCDD OCDD
Dioxin Congener
(1 ) - Total mass of congener in all input or output streams normalized
by the total mass of all congeners in all input or output streams
Input streams
Output streams
Figure 5-5. Dioxin congener distributions (detected data only).
5-29
-------
Condition 1: Waste Water
TCDF PeCDF HxCDF HpCDF OCDF
Furan Congener
(1) - Total mass of congener in all input or output streams normalized
by the total mass of all congeners in all input or output streams
| Input streams
|j| Output streams
Figure 5-6.. Furan congener distributions (detected data only).
S-30
-------
output streams by the total PQDD/PCDF input or output, respectively. Only detected congenere were
considered. Figure 5-5 clearly shows that the total PCDD input and output masses used to compute the
DEs were composed mainly of less toxic hexa- through octa- congeners. However, the PCDF profiles for
Condition 1, 2, and 3 contained significant portions of tetra- congeners as shown in Figure 5-8. The
congener shifts vary significantly from run to run and between PCDD/PCDF. Several observations
include: (Condition 1, PCDD) shift from hepta- to octa-; (Condition 2, PCDD/PCDF) shift from octa- to
tetra- through hepta- congeners; (Condition 3, PCDD) shift from octa- and hepta- to hexa- congeners;
(Condition 1, PCDF) no significant PCDF shift; and (Condition 3, PCDF) shift from tetra- and penta- to
hexa-, hepta-, and octa-congeners.
Products of Incomplete Combustion
CO and THC are often used as indicators of combustion efficiency. Table 5-10 shows the
concentration and emission rates for PICs measured at the stack of the auxiliary boiler. The results are
reported on a dry basis and corrected to 7 percent Oa- Significant amounts of THC and CO were
measured during the first two test runs for Condition 1. PIC emission during the subsequent test runs
were generally very tow. Emissions of PAHs and benzene are also shown in the table for comparison.
There were no significant correlations of PAHs and, benzene emissions with either CO or THC.
TABLE 5-10. PRODUCTS OF INCOMPLETE COMBUSTION AT STACK (SS16)
Condition 1
Run1
Run 2
Run 3
Average
Condition 2
Run1
Run 2
Condition 3
Run1
Run 2
Run3
Average
THC (dry, as methane)
ppmv
@7%02
41.4
35
1.6
15.50
0.9
0.4
•1.1
1.1
2.4
1.53
q/hr
429
0.392
0.187
1.62
0.121
0.0703
0.239
0.154
0.360
0.25
(refer to Abbreviations and Symbo
CO (dry)
ppmv
@7%02
34
32
4
235
820
13
4
1
2
2.3
S/hr
6.16
6.26
0514
4.41
1.93
3.99
1.52
0244
0524
0.76
PAHs (dry)
ug/dscm
@7%02
< 15.6
< 47.9
< 22.4
< 28.63
< 4.36
< 2.35
ND 25.7
ND 35.1
< 11.3
< 24.03
s table at beginn ng of report
mg/hr
/
2.43
8.53
3.96
4.97
0.907
0.697
8.85
7.51
2.62
6.33
Benzene
ug/dscm
@7%02
< 181
. 30.4
7.70
< 73.1
BQL 1.93
< 6.08
< 128
ALR 203
8.48
> 113.3
for key to abbrevia
dry)
mq/hr
282
5.10
135
1154
0.391
160
41.7
42.6
191
?R74
ons)
&-31
-------
The high CO and THC emissions during the initial test runs were attributed to poor auxiliary boiler
operation during these runs. Figure 5-7 compares oxygen, carbon monoxide, and total hydrocarbon
trends during the first test run (Condition 1 Run 1) and during the fourth test run (Condition 3 Run 1).
During the first test run, large oxygen excursions were observed. These excursions occurred whenever
the boiler cycled from low- to high- fire or vice-versa. As discussed earlier, the excess capacity of the
boiler caused this to occur frequently during the initial runs. The figure also shows that CO and THC
excursions, as high as 900 ppm (or higher since readings were off-scale) occurred with these cycles. It
was later found that the boiler combustion air damper linkage was out of adjustment, causing high excess
oxygen during tow-fire conditions. This probably caused quenching in the combustion chamber of the
boiler, .resulting in the escape of CO and hydrocarbons. ELI rectified the problem by adjusting the
damper linkage—which reduced the excess oxygen excursions—and by venting steam which maintained
the boiler at high-fire most of the time. The results of these changes in operation are apparent in the
results of Condition 3 Run 1. Excess oxygen levels were much more uniform (at approximately 8
percent) and CO and THC excursions did not exceed 30 ppm and 3 ppm, respectively. The Condition
3 Run 1 results were much more typical of the later test runs.
AIR EMISSIONS
The stack of the auxiliary boiler is the sole point of air emissions from the process, except for any
fugitive emissions. Fugitive emissions were not measured during this demonstration. Emissions of HCI,
NOX, S02, CO, THC, and particulate matter from the boiler stack were measured. In addition, opacity
was determined.
HCI Emissions
HCI emissions (Table 5-11) were very low; they did not vary significantly from run to run. Throughout
Conditions 1 and 2, HCI concentrations fell below the detection limit (ND) of the test method
(approximately 0.5 ppm). HCI concentrations slightly above the detection limit were measured for one
run of Condition 3. This likely was due to the higher chlorine input (caused by high PCB concentration in
the waste oil) for this run. In any case, the results indicated that the HCI removal efficiency of the
scrubber, which was not measured directly, was probably very good. This conclusion is corroborated by
the chlorine mass balance discussed earlier. Mass emission rates of HCI are also shown in this table. For
comparison, HCI emissions limits for RCRA regulated incinerators are 1.80 kg/hr (3.96 Ib/hr). Emissions
from the process are well below this limit.
5-32
-------
Condition 1 - Run 1
Oxygen (as measured)
21 T-
JUULJ
CM CM
Carbon Monoxide (dry @ 7% O2)
o
O
M
I
§
§ a S ^ S cM to
J5 N CM CM CM CM CM
Total Hydrocarbon (dry, methane O 7% O2)
Q.
Q.
0)
U
O
U
200
100
O
•
iLlli,,
|fl
I
||
1- I
§
Condition 3 - Run 1
Oxygen (as measured)
21T
i B. •
c 15-.
S 6
g 34-
O
u> in at in in in in m in in in tn at in in
?. T. ?. T. ?. T. ?. T. ?. T. ?. T. ?. *~ "+
•r- CM CM P> •* 4f U>U>tt> O>l^ r^OO O>
Carbon Monoxide (Dry O 7% O2)
30
e 20- •
•| 15-
5 10- .
S 5 +
S °
n
£ ininininininminmininininmin
Total Hydrocarbon (Dry, methane O 7% O2)
44-
§ 3 +
u
o 0
t> in at in in
^ninminminininininininminin
Figure 5-7= P!C trends during initial tests compared to later tests.
-------
TABLE 5-11. HYDROGEN CHLORIDE EMISSION SUMMARY
Condition 1
Run1
Run 2
Run3
Average
Condition 2
Run1
Run 2
Condition 3
Run1
Run 2
Run 3
Average
Concentration (dry, 7% 02)
mg/dscm
ND 0.75
ND 0.55
ND 0.68
ND 0.659
ND 0.83
ND 0.53
ND 0.59
ND 0.67
1.16
< 0.807
ppmv
ND 0.49
ND 056
ND 0.45
ND 0.435
ND 055
ND 0.35
ND 0.39
ND 0.44
0.77
< 0.533
Emission rate
mg/hr
ND 116
ND 922
ND 119
ND 109.1
ND 168
ND 138
ND 193
ND 140
261
< 197.8
Criteria Air Pollutants
Table 5-12 presents emissions of NOX, S02l THC, CO, paniculate matter, and opacity for each test
run. NOX and S02 emissions were independent of the test conditions. NOX emissions were fairly typical
of small natural gas or propane fired boilers. Trace amounts of SOa were measured due to small amounts
of sulfur in the waste and the odorant used in the propane gas, which was the main fuel for the boiler,
Paniculate emissions and opacity also showed little dependence on conditions, except for Condition 3
Run 3, which had relatively high paniculate emissions. This could not be attributed to any difference in
operating conditions or any measurement error for this test run. THC and CO emissions also were
considered very low and typical of gas fired boilers, with the exception of the initial runs discussed
earlier.
Other Air Emissions
Table 5-13 summarizes average emissions of all substances measured at the stack for each test
condition. Where possible, the level of emissions measured during this demonstration is placed in
context of emissions limits established by other regulations or emissions from other types of thermal
treatment systems. Table 5-14 presents established and potential emissions limits under several federal,
state, and focal regulations for many of the substances measured in this demonstration. By comparison
to the levels shown in the table, emissions of volatile organic compounds, semivolatile organic
compounds and trace metals generally were well below levels which might be of concern.
5-34
-------
TABLE 5-12. CRITERIA AIR POLLUTANTS
Condition 1
Run1
Run 2
Run3
Average
Condition 2
Run1
Run 2
Condition 3
Run1
Run 2
Run 3
Average
NOx (dry)
ppmv
7% 02
60.8
60.0
61.5
60.8
629
69.7
62.8
63.9
63.9
63.5
g/hr
18.1
19.3
20.6
19.3
24.3
35.1
39.1
25.6
27.5
30.7
S02
ppmv
7% 02
5.1
1.1
0.3
2.17
1.7
2.2
2.3
1.5
0.5
1.43
dry)
g/hr
2.11
0.49
0.14
0.915
0.92
1.54
1.99
0.84
0.30
1.043
Particulate (dry)
mg/dscm
7% 02
0.431
0.036
0.032
0.1663
0.430
0.130
0.017
0.025
2916
0.9660
mg/hr
67.0
6.01
5.62
26.22
87.3
35.5
5.5
5.2
656
222
THC (dry)
ppmv
@7%02
41.4
3.5
1.6
15.5
0.9
0.4
1.1
1.1
24
1.53
g/hr
4.29
0.39
0.19
1.62
0.12
0.07
024
0.15
0.36
0.251
CO (dry)
ppmv
@7%02
34
32
4
23.3
8.200
13.000
4
1
2
23
g/hr
6.16
6.26
0.81
4.41
1.93
3.99
1.52
0.24
0.52
0.761
Opacity
(%)
0
0
0
0
NA
NA
0
0
0
0
PCB-
Total PCB concentrations, defined in the U. S. for air emissions as the sum of tri- through deca-
congener groups, ranged from <0.08 |ig/dscm to <1.24 u,g/dscmi. Most of the results were below the
detection limit, with the exception of Condition 2 Run 2, where PCBs were detected in the tri- through
penta- congener groups. For comparison, these levels are much lower than risk-based air emissions
limits for PCB established in California by the South Coast Air Quality.Management District (SCAQMD)
under Rule 1401/1201. This rule would limit emissions to of 3.35x10-4 kg/day (7.39x10-4 Ib/day), which
corresponds to a stack concentration of approximately 36 pg/dscm assuming 24-hour operation.
Chlorobenzenesand Chlorophenols--
The total CB/CP concentrations were below the method detection limits for all tests. The detection
limits ranged from 4.48 |ig/dscm to 12.6 u,g/dscm for chlorobenzenes and from 8.26 uxj/dscm up to 26.2
u.g/dscm for Chlorophenols. For comparison, Title III of the U.S. 1990 Clean Air Act Amendments
(CAAA) proposes a risk-based standard of 5.17 kg/day (11.4 Ib/day) for CB/CP, which corresponds to a
concentration of approximately 550 mg/dscm, assuming 24-hour operation. The measured concentrations
were well .below this level.
PAH-
PAH emissions ranged from <2.34 u.g/dscm to <28.6 |ig/dscm. The majority of the results were
below the analytical detection limit, except for naphthalene, which had detected levels throughout
1 The "less than" sign (<) indicates that some of the data are based on detection limits.
5^35
-------
TABLE 5-13 SS16 - BOILER STACK GAS RESULTS SUMMARY
Substance
Stack gas flow rate (total)
Moisture (as measured, wet basis)
Sc
Concentration (dry, corrected to 7% 02)
Units
dscm/hr
%
Condition 1
Waste water
182
9.7
Condition 2 • soil
Run1
208
11.8
Run 2
297
9.7
Condition 3
Waste oil
263
10.6
(mi-volatile organic compounds
Po
Ch
ly-chlorinated biphenyls (PCBs)
Monochlorobiphenyl (total)
Dichlorobiphenyl (total)
Trichlorobiphenyl (total)
TetracMorobiphenyl (total)
Pentachtorobiphenyl (total)
Hexachlorobiphenyl (total)
Heptachlorobiphenyl (total)
Octachlorobiphenyl (total)
Nonachlorobiphenyl (total)
Decachlorobiphenyl (total)
Total PCBs (tri-deca) including NDs
Total PCBs (mono-deca) including NDs
Total PCBs (tri-deca) excluding NDs
Total PCBs (mono-deca) excluding NDs
fig/dscm
(ig/dscm
ug/dscm
ug/dscm
ug/dscm
ug/dscm
ug/dscm
Ug/dscm
ug/dscm
ug/dscm
ug/dscm
ug/dscm
ug/dscm
ug/dscm
ND 0.002
0.074
< 0.054
ND 0.005
< 0.008
ND 0.007
< 0.011
ND 0.007
ND 0.009
ND 0.035
< 0.137
< 0.213
> 0.1 10
> 0.250
ND 0.002
ND 0.002
ND 0.003
ND 0.01
EMPC 0.02
ND 0.01
ND 0.01
ND 0.01
ND 0.01
ND 0.02
< 0.08
< 0.08
> 0.02
> 0.02
ND 0.008
0.13
0.53
0.48
0.03
ND 0.03
ND 0.03
ND 0.03
ND 0.01
ND 0.10
< 1.24
< 1.37
> 1.04
> 1.17
ND 0.003
< 0.085
< 0.015
< 1.048
< 0.030
ND 0.007
ND 0.006
ND 0.007
ND 0.007
ND 0.022
< 1.141
< 1.229
> 1.080
> 1.160
lorobenzenes and chlorophenols
1,2Dichlorobenzene
1 ,2,3,4-Tetrachlorobenzene
1 ,2,3,5-Tetrachlorobenzene
1 ,2,3 • Trichlorobenzene
1 ,2,4,5 • Tetrachtorobenzene
1,2,4- Trichlorobenzene
1 ,3 - Dichlorobenzene
1,3,5- Trichlorobenzene
1,4- Dichlorobenzene
2,3-Dtehlorophenol
2,3,4 - Trichtorophenol
2,3,4,5 • Tetrachlorophenol
2,3,5- Trichtorophenol
2,3,5,6 - Tetrachlorophenol
2,3,6- Trichtorophenol
2,4-Dichloropheno!
2,4,5- Trichtorophenol
2,4,6- Trichtorophenol
2,5-Dichlorophenol
2,6-Dichlorophenol
2-Chlorophenol
3,4 - Dichlorophenol
3,5-Dichlorophenol
3,4-Chlorophenol
Hexachlorobenzene
Pentachlorobenzene
Pentachtorophenol
Total chlorobenzenes
Total chlorophenols
Total CBs as 1,2,4 Trichlorobenzene
ug/dscm
ug/dscm
Ug/dscm
ug/dscm
ug/dscm
ug/dscm
ug/dscm
ug/dscm
ug/dscm
ug/dscm
ug/dscm
ug/dscm
ug/dscm
ug/dscm
ug/dscm
ug/dscm
ug/dscm
ug/dscm
ug/dscm
ug/dscm
ug/dscm
ug/dscm
ug/dscm
ug/dscm
ug/dscm
ug/dscm
ug/dscm
ug/dscm
ug/dscm
ug/dscm
ND 1.542
ND 1.034
NA NA
ND 1.358
ND 1.043
ND 1.412
ND 1.442
ND 1.396
ND 1.400
ND 1.808
ND 1.597
ND 1.669
ND 1.711
ND 1.786
ND 1.571
ND 1.745
ND 1.563
ND 1.656
ND 1.811
ND 1.556
ND 1.780
ND 1.333
ND 1.226
ND 1.296
ND 1.071
ND 0.935
ND 2.136
ND 12.63
ND 26.24
ND 12.70
ND 0.91
ND 0.81
ND 0.62
ND 1.00
ND 0.71
ND 0.93
ND 0.89
ND 0.92
ND 0.89
ND 1.42
ND 1.40
ND 1.13
ND 1.37
ND 1.12
ND 1.33
ND 1.11
ND 1.42
ND 1.38
ND 1.19
ND 1.09
ND 0.97
ND 1.34
ND 1.22
ND 0.49
E 0.63
ND 0.63
ND 1.34
ND 8.05
ND 19.3
ND 8.85
ND 1.07
ND 0.88
ND 0.86
ND 1.20
ND 0.73
ND 1.11
ND 1.06
ND 1.08
ND 1.09
ND 1.57
ND 1.41
ND 1.06
ND 1.32
ND 1.18
ND 1.44
ND 1.34
ND 1.34
ND 1.39
ND 1.21
ND 1.27
ND 1.08
ND 1.01
ND 1.03
ND 0.52
ND 0.64
ND 0.76
ND 1.41
ND 9.41
ND 19.6
ND 10.42
ND 0.457
ND 0.446
NA NA
ND 0.471
ND 0.236
ND 0.434
ND 0.438
ND 0.428
ND 0.444
ND 0.486
ND 0.583
ND 0.482
ND 0.693
ND 0.761
ND 0.580
ND 0.399
ND 0.576
ND 0.637
ND 0.467
ND 0.164
ND 0.473
ND 0.428
ND 0.171
ND 0.098
ND 0.635
ND 0.491
ND 1.265
ND 4.481
ND 8.263
ND 4.205
5-36
-------
TABLE 5-13. SS16 - BOILER STACK GAS RESULTS SUMMARY
(continued)
Substance
Po
Die
Concentration (dry, corrected to 7% 02)
Units
Condition 1
Waste water
Condition 2 - soil
Run1
Run 2
ly-aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs
Naphthalene
2-Methylnaphthalene
2-Ct-Naphthatene
Acsnaphthytene
Acenapthene
Fluorene
Phenanthrehe
Anthracene
Fluoranthene
Pyrene
Benzo (a) anthracene
Chrysene
Benzo (b) fluoranthene
Benzo (k) fluoranthene
Benzo (e) pyrene
Benzo (a) pyrene
Perytene
lndeno(1^,3-cd) pyrene
Dibenz (a,h) anthracene
Benzo (g,h,i) perylene
Total PAHs
Hg/dscm
ng/dscm
ng/dscm
mj/dscm
no/dscm
Hudson
ng/dscm
ng/dscm
ng/dscm
uq/dscm
H9/dscm
ng/dscm
m/dscm
ng/dscm
W/dscm
ug/dscm
ng/dscm
fig/dscm
ng/dscm
ng/dscm
uq/dscm
20.35
ND 0.816
ND 0.5S5
ND 0.436
ND 0.664
ND 0.567
< 0.413
ND 0.368
< 0.557
< 0.416
ND 0.340
ND 0.360
ND 0.314
ND 0.328
ND 0.344
ND 0.334
ND 0.345
ND 0.382
ND 0.397
ND 0,366
< 28.65
E 2.5
ND 051
ND 025
ND 0.16
ND 025
ND 021
ND 0.12
ND 0.11
ND 0.08
ND 0.05
ND 0.05
ND 0.05
ND 0.04
ND 0.04
ND 0.04
ND 0.04
ND 0.06
ND 0.04
ND 0.05
ND 0,04
ND 4.4
E 1.5
ND 0.1C
ND 0.12
ND 0.07
ND 0.12
ND 0.10
ND 0.05
ND 0.05
ND 0.04
ND 0.02
ND 0.02
ND 0.02
ND 0.02
ND 0.02
ND 0.02
ND 0.02
ND 0.03
ND 0.02
ND 0.02
ND 0.02
ND 2.3
jw'ns and furans
2378 TCDD
12378PeCDD
123478 HxCDD
1 23678 HxCDD
123789 HxCDD
1 234678 HpCDD
OCDD
2378 TCDF
12378 PeCDF
23478 PeCDF
123478 HxCDF
123678 HXCDF
234678 HxCDF
123789 HxCDF
1 234678 HoCDF
1 234789 HpCDF
OCDF
TCDD (Total)
PeCDD (Total)
HxCDD (Totan
HpCDD (Total)
TCDF (Total)
PeCDF (Total)
HxCDF (Total)
HpCDF (Total)
Total dioxins (by isomer)
Total furans (by Isomer)
Total dioxins plus furans (bv isomert
ng/dscm
ng/dscm
ng/dscm
ng/dscm
nq/dscm
ng/dscm
ng/dscm
ng/dscm
ng/dscm
ng/dscm
ng/dscm
ng/dscm
ng/dscm
ng/dscm
rxj/dscm
ng/dscm
ng/dscm
ng/dscm
ng/dscm
no/dscm
ng/dscm
ng/dscm
ng/dscm
ng/dscm
ng/dscm
ng/dscm
ng/dscm
nq/dscm
ND 0.004
ND 0.007
< 0.007
< 0.008
< 0.010
0.075
< 0.283
< 0.008
< 0.008
< 0.010
< 0.025
< 0.011
< 0.016
< 0.006
< 0.039
< 0.021
< 0.224
< 0.011
< 0.012
< 0.067
0.125
< 0.020
< 0.041
< 0.080
< 0.094
< 0.368
< 0.011
< 0.379
ND 0.002
0.003
ND 0.003
ND 0.002
ND 0.003
ND 0.02
B 020
0.003
ND 0.002
ND 0.002
ND 0.002
0.003
0.009
ND 0.003
0.033
0.009
0.063
ND 0.002
ND 0.003
0.003
0.042
0.003
0.01
0.03
0.06
< 0.13
< 0.01
< 0.14
ND 0.003
ND 0.004
ND 0.005
ND 0.004
ND 0.004
EMPC 0.01
B 0.08
0.001
ND 0.003
ND 0.003
EMPC 0.003
ND 0.003
ND 0.003
ND 0.004
EMPC 0.004
ND 0.005
ND 0.010
EMPC 0.003
ND 0.004
EMPC 0.007
EMPC 0.019
0.001
EMPC 0.001
EMPC 0.005
EMPC 0.005
< 0.04
< 0.004
< 0.04
Condition 3
Waste oil
< 2.363
ND 1.203
ND 1.299
ND 0.862
ND 1.316
ND 1.147
ND. 0.763
ND 0.736
ND 0.716
ND 0.766
ND 1.058
ND 1.196
ND 1.341
ND 1.331
ND 1.306
ND 1.343
ND 1.491
ND 1.199
ND 1.328
ND 1.280
< 24.04
ND 0.002
ND 0.002
ND 0.002
< 0.002
< 0.002
< 0.007
0.090
< 0.002
< 0.002
< 0.002
< 0.003
< 0.002
0.003
ND 0.002
< 0.009
< 0.005
< 0.079
< 0.002
< 0.002
< 0.010
0.015
< 0.005
< 0.008
0.008
< 0.018
< 0.156
< 0.007
< 0.163
5-37
-------
TABLE 5-11 $$16 - BOILER STACK GAS RESULTS SUMMARY
(continued)
Substance .
Volat
(race
Cont'i
Stack
le organic compounds
Vinyl chloride
Methyl chloride
Trans-1 ,2-dichloroethene
Cis-1,2-Dichloroethene
Chloroform
1,1,1 • Trichloroethane
Carbon tetrachloride
Benzene
1,2-dichloroethane
Trichloroethene
Toluene
1,1 ,2 -Trichloroethane
Tetrachloroethene
1,2-Dibromoethane
Chlorobenzene
Ethylbenzene
M-/P-xylene . .
0-xylene
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
1 ,4 -Dichloro benzene
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
metals
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Beryllium
Cadmium
Chromium (total)
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Phosphorus
Selenium '
Silver
Thallium
Tin
Zinc
luous emissions monitorinq results
Oxygen (as measured)
Carbon dioxide
Total hydrocarbons (as methane)
Carbon monoxide
Nitrogen oxides
Sulfur dioxide
Concentration (dry, corrected to 7% 02)
Units
Condition 1
Waste water
Condition 2 -soil
Run1
Run 2
ng/dscm
Mg/dscm
ng/dscm
ng/dscm
uo/dscm
ng/dscm
ng/dscm
ng/dscm
ng/dscm
UQ/dscm
ng/dscm
ng/dscm
ng/dscm
ng/dscm
ng/dscm
ng/dscm
ng/dscm
ng/dscm
ng/dscm
ng/dscm
W/dscm
ng/dscm
ng/dscm
ng/dscm
ng/dscm
ng/dscm
tig/dscm
ng/dscm
ng/dscm
ng/dscm
jig/dscm
ng/dscm
ng/dscm
ng/dscm
jig/dscm
ng/dscm
ng/dscm
ng/dscm
%
%
ppmv
ppmv
ppmv
ppmv
NO 1.043
< 67.39
ND 1.043
NO 1.043
ND 1.043
< 1.100
ND 1.043
< 73.08
ND 1.043
< 1.159
< 8.536
ND 1.043
< 3.847
ND 1.043
ND 1.043
ND 1.043
< 1.317
ND 1.043
ND 1.043
ND 1.043
ND 1.043
ND 0.98
< 3
ND 0.98
ND 0.98
ND 0.98
< 2.66
ND 0.98
BQL 2
ND 0.98
ND 0.98
< 1.8
ND 0.98
< 1.00
ND 0.98
ND 0.98
ND 0.98
ND 1.96
ND 0.98
ND 0.98
ND 0.98
< 1.10
ND 1.05
< 2
ND 1.05
ND 1.05
ND 1.05
< 1.05
ND 1.05
< 6
ND 1.05
ND 1.05
< 4.7
ND 1.05
ND 1.05
ND 1.05
ND 1.05
ND 1.05
ND 2.11
ND 1.05
ND 1.05
< 1.14
< 1.28
< 8.657
ND 7.403
< 2.266
ND 0.170
< 1.691
< 1.220
1.923
< 7.956
51.66
< 0.087
< 1.134
< 9.529
ND 7.403
ND 0.740
ND 7.403
ND 7.403
21.46
8.200
8.890
15.50
23.3
60.77
2.17
3.7
ND -2.88
1.61
ND 0.29
ND 0.29
0.72
1.90
4.6
3.5
ND 0.06
0.55
ND 2.9
ND 2.88
ND 2.88
ND 2.88
ND 2.68
9.2
7.38
8.71
0.9
8.2
62.9
1.7
miscellaneous
Paniculate
Hydrogen chloride
Opacity (as measured)
mg/dscm
mg/dscm
%
0.166
ND 0.659
0
0.43
ND 0.83
NA
1.8
ND 1.35
0.57
ND 0.13
0.35
0.69
0.51
2.7
0.3
ND 6.00
0.32
ND' 1.3
ND 1.35
ND 1.35
ND 1.35
1.75
2.7
8.57
9.11
0,4
13
69.7
22
ND 0.13
ND 0.53
NA
Condition 3
Waste oil
ND 1.01
< 100.4
ND 1.006
ND 1.006
ND 1.115
< 1.721
< 1.071
< ** 113.0
< 1.039
< 1.523
< 14.73
< 1.185
< 4.507
ND 1.006
ND 1.006
< 1.471
ND 1.006
ND 1.006
ND 1.006
ND 1.006
ND 1.006
< 5.133
ND 4.422
< 1.170
ND 0.044
< 0.993
< 0.934
< 1.522
< 3.945
< 2.125
< 0.065
< 0.755
< 6.309
ND 4.422
ND 0.442
ND 4.422
< 4.422
24.45
7.490
8.933
1.53
2.3
63.53
1.43
0.986
< 0.807
0
(refer to Abbreviations and Symbols table at beginning of report for key to abbreviations)
5-38
-------
TABLE 5-14. SUMMARY OF SELECTED REGULATORY EMISSION LIMITS
Pollutant or Regulation
PM
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Mercury
Nickel
Silver
Chromium JV)
NOx
SOx
HCI
CO
THC
PCB
Oioxins
Furans
Benzene
Vinyl chloride
Ethyibenzene
Toluene
Perchloroethylene
Chlorpjhenol
Chlorobenzene
1,2,3Trichorobenzene
Hexachlorobenzene
PAH's
Benzo(ajanJBiracene
§S2«[!lB!!»ne _
BenzoJbJfluoranUiene
Benzo(_k)fluoranthene
Chrysene
Dibenz(a,h]antf]racene
I^Mli^Jpjene
NapiiaTene
Possible CAA Title III Risk Based
Standards (5) Section 112 (0 and (o)
Unit risk Amoiemair Emission limit
factor con. estimate (8)
(10) limit/RAC (Ib/day)
(ug/dscm)
1.50E+W 2.«':2T~
S.OflE+bi 6.57^:b'$ —
2.4bE-6'f •""TITO'S —
126E-63 6.33k-64 1.66E-3-1.35E-4
TeSE+QT TfioFfis' l84E¥33:2"5F9"
s 2.ooE-o7^T«E^-^2'5F8'
"636E-06 1.26E-61 6.23-6.62
y.16E-66 ^"tJUgOT fX27^i);diS"
3.l6E-b'i 6.'$9=bliS
3.50E-KJ1 67.2— S.SS'
7.66e+01 1.34E2-i;i4ET
,
4.90E-04 2.04E-Q3 379IF3-3.32E3'
3.OTE-03"1 3.63E-04 S'JBTE*^S&5"
,
1.40E-02 7.141-05 1.37E"-'4~OgE-5
1.40E+01 [ 26.9—2.28
SCAQMD Rule 1401/1201 Risk Based
Standards (6)
Unit risk [ Ambient ai Emission limit
factor | cone, limit estimate (8)
(11) j(ug/dscm) (Ib/day)
i
i
i
i
i
i
1 r-
i
i
Tsw-ortTomr^e:^^
T """
I
T56F6Ti'"6':67E-'65 "OgE:;R:fiSF5
i
1 !
1
1
• '•• < — t ———.•...„„„
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2.26E-63 ! 4.54E-63 S.72E-3-7.3SE-4
i
i
i
i
i
38 i-TelErer "S:6SE-TT2gET
i
5.36E-65 j 1.S9E-61 6.64-6.36 "
7:saF-85 iTSBBH T®SPOfflr~
i
— " 1 1 :
1
Tssssr^TKSsm 311-2:8
i "- :
i
i ••"
i
j
"416F04 r'^E-oTaoVCslE-r"
1
TyoFosTrslE^s o.tii-9.S7E-4
"OoFosy sSBRan m^*sre*
TToFos^LssFos™1 676T-9.S7F4 "
"O6F6Trs:88i:63- oTi-9.5"7E-4
TToFos-iTgg&or 0.01-^:^4
TToFoTlTesFos-4 -OT-9.57E-4
OoFoflTssE-oi"" o".oT-9T57F4
i
TCI.P
Waste
Leachate
Standards
(mg/L)
40CFR261
s:o
Vi-
sa '""
0.5
'6T
100
0.13
5^39
-------
TABLE 5-14. (continued)
Pollutant or
Regulation
PM
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Mercury
Nickel
Silver
Chromium (IV)
NOx
SOx
HCI
CO
THC
PCB
Oioxins
Furans
RCRA
Incinerator 40
CFR264
SubpartO(l)
<53§gr)dscf®
7% 02
100 ppm CO and
<20 ppm THC
see above
Iterlll
~A~mb7enf "Em(isiohlrnH~
air con. estimate (8) (Ib/day
limit except where
(ug/dscm) noted)
.6dgr/dscfS7%
02
8.3Qb-64 1.6E-3-1.3E-4
9.00E-02 0.6"1^6.'17
S.65E-62 O.OT-^OS
""'"""8 6.49^578"
TSSE+66" — nOT4T
<16u ppm or >100
ppm CO and <20
ppm THC
see above
NSPSMSW
Incinerator 40
CFR 60 (3)
.615gr/dscfa
7% 02
ISOpprhv
30 ppmv or
80% reduction
SSpprhvor
95% reduction
"TKPT56 ppmv
(9)
30ng/dscm
"IrJrTg/dscm
TSCAPCB
Incinerator 40
CFR 761 (4)
CEM
OEM
CEM
' 'CEW
<6.661gPCB/kg
of nonliquid PCB
introduced into
incinerator
Notes:
1. Applicability • HW incinerators where incinerator means any enclosed device using controlled flame combustion
to solely destroy the input waste stream
2. Applicability • HW boiler and industrial furnace (BIF) where BIF means any enclosed devices that are integral
components of manufacturing process and that use controlled flame to accomplish recovery of materials or energy
3. Applicability-HW incinerators
4. Applicability - PCB incinerators where incinerator means an engineered device using controlled flame
combustion to thermally degrade PCB's and PCB items. Note: combustion criteria requirement; 2 sec dwell time ®
1200 C and 3 percent excess 02 in stack gas; 1-1/2 sec dwell time 9 1600 C and 2 percent excess 02 in stack gas
5. Applicability - A few proposed sources include; sewage sludge incinerators, HW incinerators, and industrial
combustion boilers.
6. Applicability • Any new, relocated or modified unit that emits carcinogenic air contaminants. An acceptable risk ol
1 x 10-5 was specified
7. Limits for HCI and metals will depend upon the facility location and the stack height Values given are the range
of possible limits as specified by the regulation
8. The values for HCI and metals are dependent upon the height of the stack (4-120m), urban or rural location,
complex or noncomplex terrain and operation schedule (365 days/yr, 24 hr/day). Values given are an estimate of
the possible range of limits for a typical facility (a 20 ft stack was assumed)
9. Limit will depend upon the type of facility: modular mass bum, RDF stokers, etc. Note: 7000gr/Ib
10. EPA specified unit risk factors obtainable from the Integrated Risk Information System (IRIS) data base.
11. SCAQMD specified unit risk factors per "Procedures for Preparing Risk Assessments to comply with Air Toxics
Rules cfihe South Coast Air Quality Management District," April 1991.
WQ
-------
Condition 1 of 20.35 u.g/dscm. For comparison, Title III of the CAM proposed a risk-based standard of
1.03 kg/day (2.28 Ib/day) for naphthalene, which corresponds to a concentration of approximately 110
mg/dscm, assuming 24-hour operation. The measured levels were well below this level.,
PCDD/PCDF-
The total PCDD and PCDF ranged from < 0.04 ng/dscm to < 0.156 ng/dscm and from < 0.004
ng/dscm to < 0.011 ng/dscm, respectively. For comparison, these values were well below U.S. New
Source Performance Standards for municipal solid waste combustors (40 CFR 60 (3)), which limit the sum
of total PCDD plus PCDF to 30 ng/dscm.
Volatile Organic Compounds—
The concentration of most volatile organic compounds was below the method detection limits except
for benzene and toluene. Benzene concentrations ranged from < 2 u,g/dscm to < 73.1 uxj/dscm.
Toluene concentrations ranged from < 1.8 ug/dscm to < 14.73 ug/dscm. These emissions levels were
tow in comparison to most risk-based emissions limits.
Trace Metals-
Trace metals may originate in the waste material or other process feedstocks. Metals emissions were
generally very tow and relatively insensitive to test conditions. Emissions of many metals were below the
detection limits of the test methods. In comparison, emissions of chromium, lead, mercury and silver
emissions were below Tier III emissions guidelines established for boilers and industrial furnaces under
RCRA (40 CFR 264 Subpart H). Silver was riot detected in any test, and mercury was detected in only a
few test runs.
•NOX, S02, andTHC-
Continuous emission monitoring (CEM) results were very consistent from run to run, except for
Condition 1 Run 1 where the boiler was operating inefficiently. The concentration of NOX ranged from
60.0 ppmv to 69.7 ppmv, while the concentrations for THC and S02 ranged from 0.4 ppmv to 41.4 ppmv
and from 0.3 ppmv to 5.1 ppmv, respectively. For comparison, these values were well below New Source
Performance Standards for municipal solid waste combustors (40 CFR 60 (3)).
Particulate Matter—
The particulate matter concentration was quite low. The particulate concentrations ranged from 0.13
mg/dscm up to 0.986 mg/dscm. For comparison, these concentrations were well below the limit
5-41
-------
established for hazardous waste incinerators regulated under RCRA in 40 CFR 264 Subpart 0. This limit
is 0.08 gr/dscf (183 mg/dscm) concentration at 7 percent 02.
HCI-
HCI concentrations were very low, generally below the method detection limit. The HCI
concentrations ranged from 0.53 mg/dscm to <0.807 mg/dscm at 7 percent 02. For comparison, HCI
emissions limits established for boilers and industrial furnaces regulated under RCRA in 40 CFR 264
Subpart H (Tier II and Tier III) are 2.4 Ib/day, or approximately 11 mg/dscm for the ELI process
conditions. The measured emission levels were well below these limits.
RESIDUAL STREAMS AND EFFLUENTS
Table 5-15 shows the yield of process effluents and residual streams on a mass per unit of waste
feed basis. The scrubber decant water is the largest output stream produced by the process, equalling
or exceeding the mass of waste processed in most cases. The boiler flue gas (for all conditions) and the
clean soil (for Condition 2) yields also were significant. The amount of other residual streams and effluents
produced by the process is much smaller. To determine the potential ramifications of these by-products,
the characteristics of each stream were isolated.
TABLE 5-15. YIELD OF PROCESS RESIDUALS AND EFFLUENTS PER UNIT OF WASTE FEED
Process stream
Hes
Out
SS1 - Waste water
SS2- Waste oil
SS3 - Site soils
idual streams
SS11 - Reactor grit
SS15-Tankcondensate
SS18- Heat exchanger
SS22 • Scrubber liauor
>ut streams
SS10- Clean soil
SS12- Scrubber sludge
SS13- Scrubber decant
SS16- Stack*
SS24- Quench water
Condition
Run1 | Run 2
0.982
0.018
NA
0.002
NA
0.000
•0256
1
Run 3
0.991
0.009
NA
0.0003
NA
0.000
-0.030
NA
0.035
1.109
0.777
NA
NA
0.019
0.606
0.606
NA
0.980
0.020
NA
0.0002
NA
0.000
•0.081
Average
Yield (kg/kg waste feed)
Condition 2
Run1 | Run 2
0.984
0.016
NA
0.001
NA
0.000
•0.122
NA
0.043
1.576
0.830
NA
NA
0.032
1.097
0.738
MA
0.472
NA
0.0002
NA
NA
0.024
0.778
NA
0.0004
NA
NA
•0.082
Condition 3
0.930
0.070
NA I
0.0003
0.001
0.000
•0.125
0.528
0.002
0.366
0.555
0.011
0239
0.004
0.762
0.814
•0.025
NA
0.108
0.771
0.956
NA
0.699
0.301
0.001
0.002
0.000
0.139
NA
0201
4221
0.976
NA
0.714
0286
0.001
0.004
0.000
0.000
NA
0208
5.986
1.017
NA
0.781
0219
0.001
0.002
0.000
NA
0.172
3.659
0.98
NA
Takes into account combustion air
5-42
-------
Effluent and Residual Streams Characteristics
Table 5-16 presents the concentrations of semivolatile organics, volatile organics, and trace metals in
the various process streams. The table shows the waste feed and intermediate stream characteristics in
addition to effluent and residual stream characteristics. The flow rate of each stream also is given in the
table. For condition 3, note that all flow rates correspond to waste processing periods except those for
the propane (SS6), combustion air (SS9), and boiler flue gas (SS16). These rates correspond to flow
rates during boiler stack tests when reformed gas was fed to the boiler from the compressed storage
tank. The flow rate of reformed gas the boiler during stack tests averaged 2.13 kg/hr (4.70 Ib/hr).
Major Output Streams—
Besides the boiler flue gas, which was discussed earlier, the major output streams are the decant
water (all test conditions) and the treated soil (Condition 2 only). Compared to TCLP leachate standards
shown earlier in Table 5-14, the decant water did not exceed any regulated limits; however, PAHs were
found which are significantly above the drinking water standard. Hexachlorobenzene and vinyl chloride
detection limits were below the TCLP leachate standard. PCBs were present at concentrations far below
the allowable level in the original waste water. However, there was accumulation of benzene and PAHs
in significant amounts in the decant water. Therefore, further treatment of the decant water is probably
required prior to disposal or discharge to public water treatment systems.
The treated soil leaving the TDU contained significant amounts of PCBs, although at levels well below
the contaminated soil feed. Benzene also was present in the treated soil. The level of PCBs in the
treated soil exceeded the 2 ppm limit in the TSCA permit (29 and 8 ppm for Runs 1 and 2, respectively),
and thus required disposal in accordance with TSCA requirements.
Minor Output Streams—
The other output streams from the process are the scrubber liquor, scrubber sludge, and reactor grit.
The scrubber liquor would be separated and removed as scrubber decant water and scrubber sludge in
a commercial application. The scrubber sludge contained approximately 15-18 ppm of PCBs, and thus
would need disposal in the same manner as the treated soil. Significant amounts of other semivolatile
organics and benzene also were measured in scrubber sludge samples. For Condition 2, the TDU
quench water is also a process residual. The quench water contained approximately 0.1 to 3 ppm of
PCBs and other semivolatile organics. However, levels for Run 2 were much lower than Run 1 which
suggests that levels might ultimately be lower in an optimized TDU system. Reactor grit contained
relatively large amounts of semivolatile organics including PCBs. This may be due to the method of
5-43
-------
TABLE 5-16. CHARACTERIZATION OF PROCESS RESIDUAL STREAMS AND EFFLUENTS
Condition 1
Sampling location
Description
Total mass flow, kg/tir
Total mass flow, b/hr
Density. g/L
Volumetric flow, dscm/hr
Volumetric flow. L/hr
Moisture, wt. %
SEMI-VOLATILE ORGANICS
Fluoranthene
Hexachlorobenzene
Naphthalene
Phenanthrene
Pyrene
Total chlorobenzenes
Total chlorophenols
Total PAH's
Total PCB's (mono-deca)
Total PCB's (trt-deca)
Total PCDD/PCDF (by Isomer
1 .2.4.-Tr)chlorobenzene
VOLATILE ORGANICS
3enzene
Methyl chloride
Tetrachloroethene
Toluene
Trichloroethene
Vinyl chloride
METALS
Antimony
Arsenic
Jartum
Beryllium
Cadmium
Chromium (total)
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Phosphorus
Selenium
Silver
halllum
Tin
Zinc
Input streams
SS1
Waste water
1O4
229
977
-
1O6
_ ' . ' _
»ig/L
ND 1.06
NO 1.06
ND 1,06
ND 1.06
ND 1.06
ND 11.8
ND 16
ND 21
< 22.8
< 20.3
< O.OO054
ND 1.06
ng/L
< 3.7
< 6
< 2
ND 2
< 2
ND 2
Hg/L
ND 100
ND 100
387
ND 10
ND 10
< 11
27
54
< 127
ND 020
ND TO
203
ND 100
ND 10
ND 100
ND 100
290
SS2
Waste oil
1.46
3.22
1000
-
1.46
' -
Mg*g
ND 930O
ND 9300
BQL 58000
ND 93OO
ND 9300
< 2535OO
ND 139900
< 32O40O
2.38E+O8
2.26E+O8
< 327
100000
gn.
BQL 3
38
ND 2
15
180
ND 2
mg/kg
ND 10
ND 10
5.7
ND 1
ND 1
16
8.2
11O
ND 1
ND 0.1
3.5
270
ND 10
ND 1
ND 10
ND 10
88
SS4
Scrubber Caustic
17.6
38.9
1O5O
—
16.8
-
g/L
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
9/«-
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
gt
ND 100
ND 100
ND 10
ND 10
ND 10
13
63O
ND 50
16
ND 0.2
43
ND 100
ND 100
ND 10
ND 100
ND 100
46O
SS5 Scrubber
make-up water
0
O
980
_
O
—
g/L
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
&-
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
g»-
ND 100
ND 100
14
ND 10
ND 10
ND 10
74
140
11
ND 0.2
ND 10
ND 1OO
ND 100
ND 10
ND 1OO
ND 100
13
SS6
Propane
7.62
16.8
1.76
4.32
_
_
ug/dsctn
NA
ND O.42
NA
NA
NA
ND 6.82
ND 14.2
NA
< 1.47
< 1.44
NA
ND .O.68
Hgt-
ND 6.5
ND 0.8
ND O.8
ND 13
ND 0.8
ND 0.8
U9t
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
(refer to Abbreviations and Symbols table at beginning of report for key to abbreviations) "
SS7
Hydrogen
O.138
O.3O3
O.0833
1.65
_
__
lig/dacm
NA
ND 1.98
NA
NA
NA
ND 37.9
ND 69.6
NA
ND 0.11
ND 0.10
NA
ND . 4.18
»tg/i-
BQL 1040
< 193O
ND 554
107OO
ND 554
ND 554
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
SS9 Boiler
combustion air
225
497
1.2O
187
_
ng/dscm
NA
ND 2.14
NA
NA
NA
ND 21.1
ND 43.1
NA
ND O.O6
ND O.O3
NA
ND 2.34
ng/dscm
994O
< 979
BQL 964
< 557
ND 452
ND 452
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
-------
TABLE 5-16. (continued)
Condition 1
Sampling location
Description
Total mass flow, kg/hr
Total mass flow, to/hr
Density. g/L
Volumetric flow, dscm/hr
Volumetric flow, L/hr
Moisture, wt. %
SEMI-VOLATILE ORGANICS
Fluoranlhene
Hexachlorobenzene
Naphthalene
Phenanthrene
Pyrene
Total chlorotoenzenes
Total chlorophenols
Total PAH'S
Total PCB's (mono-deca)
Total PCB's (trt-deca)
Total PCDD/PCDF (by Isomer)
1,2.4 -Trtchtorobenzene
VOLATILE ORGANICS
Benzene
Methyl chloride
Tetrachloroelhene
Toluene
Trichloroethene
Vinyl chloride
METALS
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Beryllium
Cadmium
Chromium (total)
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Phosphorus
Selenium
Silver
Thallium
Tin
Zinc
Intermediate Streams
SS11
Reactor grtt
OO656
0.145
2200
—
1 . —
85
US*9
BQL 69OOO
NO 430
16OOOO
93000
BQL 83000
NO 4740
ND 6460
< 655000
21600OO
2100000
< O.179
ND 430
ug/kg
43O
ND 14
ND 14
BQL 16
ND 14
ND 14
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
SS14
Reformed gas
8.60
19.0
O.748
11.5
_
—
• ug/dscm
NA
ND 25.80
NA
NA
NA
ND 312.O
ND 615.0
NA
< 2.84
< 1.64
< O.OO15
ND 38.3
ug/dscm
SAT 521600
ND 4.3
< 8.89
< 11960
• < 29.2
< 4.15
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
SS18 Heat ex-
changer residue
0
0
1000
—
o.o
-
HO/L
BQL 0.4
ND O.25
ND 0.25
ND 0.25
BQL 0.3
ND 2.76
ND 3.76
< 5.25
< 8.67
< 7.54
< 0.00021
ND 0.25
H9/L
< 9.3
ND 2
ND 2
ND 2
ND 2
ND 2
VQ*-
ND 100
ND 100
75O
ND 10
ND 10
23
ND 10
8O
26O
1
1O
26O
ND 100
ND 10
ND 100
ND 100
9OO
SS22
Scrubber liquor
10.8
23.9
990
—
11.0
-
MOt-
< 357
ND 2.53
BQL 710
51O
< 431
ND 27.8
ND 35.6
< 2697
< 31.5
< 3O.7
< O.OOO4
ND 2.53
H9/L
< 18.5
< 5
ND 2
ND 2
ND 2
ND 2
U8/I-
ND 100
ND 100
73
ND 10
ND 10
< 105
280
785
< 264
ND O.85
ND 40.5
145
ND 100
ND 1O
ND 10O
ND 100
28OO
Output Streams
SS12
Scrubber sludge
2.98
6.57
2200
_
1.35
81
PS/kg
BQL 2400000
ND 130OO
QS 66OOOO
BQL 2600000
29OOOOO
ND 144000
ND 196OOO
< 1280OOOO
< 1549O
< 1470O
< 4.O3
ND 13OOO
H9"<0
ND 22
BQL 73
ND 22
11OO
ND 22
ND 22
no/kg
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
(refer to Abbreviations and Symbols table at beginning of report for key to abbreviations)
SS1 3 Scrubber
decant water
98.6
217
990
_
99.5
_
U0/L
21O
ND 5.1
39OO
BQL 540
260
ND 55.9
ND 71.2
< 6640
< 203
< 195
< O.OO063
ND 5.1
ugA-
716O
ND 113
NO 113
ND 113
ND 113
ND 113
«0/L
ND 100
ND 100
11
ND 10
ND 10
22
33
12O
23
ND 02
39
ND 100
ND 100
ND 10
ND 100
ND 100
26O
SS16
Boiler flue gas
240
529
1.19
182
_
6.12
ng/dscm
< O.56
ND 1.07
20.40
< O.41
< O.42
ND 8.05
ND 19.30
< 28.70
< 021
< 0.14
< 0.0004
ND 1.41
lig/dscm
< 73.1
< 67.4
< 3.85
< 8.5
< 1.16
ND 1.04
ug/dscm
< 8.66
ND 7.40
< 2.27
ND 0.17
< 1.69
< 1.22
1.92
< 7.96
51.66
< O.O9
< 1.13
< 9.53
ND 7.4O
ND 0.74
ND 7.40
ND 7.40
21.5
-------
TABLE 5-16. (continued)
Condition 2 Run 1
T
Sampling location
Description
Total mass flow, kg/hr
Total mass flow, Ib/hr
Density, gfL
Volumetric flow, dscm/hr
Volumetric flow, L/hr
Moisture, wt%
SEMI-VOLATILE ORGANICS
Fluoranlhene
Hexachlorobenzene
Naphthalene
Phenanthrene
Pyrene
Total chlorobenzenes
Total chtorophanols
Total PAH's
Total PCB's (mono-deca)
Total PCB's (tri-deca)
Total PCDD/PCDF (by Isomer)
1,2,4 -Trtchlorobenzene
VOLATILE ORGANICS
Benzene
Methyl chloride
Telrachloroelhena
Toluene
rrichloroathene
Vinyl chloride
METALS
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Beryllium
Cadmium
Chromium (total)
Copper
.ead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
^hosphorus
Selenium
Silver
Thallium
Tin
'fnc
Input streams
SS3
Site soil
127
280
-
-
33
H9*g
BQL 24OO
63OO
BQL 180O
BQL 2900
BQL 190O
< 162OO
ND 149OO
<. 24900
< 53SOOO
< 513OOO
< 1Q.1
ND 990
ngftg
BQL 42
ALR 1BOOO
ND 30
ALR 91OO
ALR 98OOO
ALR 49OO
MQt
ND 7.4
27
11O
O.45
2.1
75
99
270
O.26
410
65
630
ND 7.4
ND 0.74
95
13
36O
SS4 Scrubber
Caustic
3S.5
84.9
105O
36.7
-
S/L
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
0rt-
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
0"-
ND 100
ND 100
ND IO
ND IO
ND 10
13
630
ND 50
16
ND 0.2
43
ND 100
ND 100
ND 10
ND 100
ND 100
460
SS6
Propane
9.53
21.0
1.76
6.40
-
-
|io/dscm
NA
ND 0.42
NA
NA
NA
ND 6.82
ND 142
NA
< 1.47
< 1.44
NA
ND 0.68
MSfl-
ND 6.5
ND 0.8
ND O.8
ND 13
ND 0.8
ND 0.8
HQt
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
SS7
Hydrogen
O.O934
0.206
O.O83
1.12
-
-
|ig/dscm
NA .
ND 1.98
NA
NA
NA
ND 37.9
ND 69.6
NA
ND O.11
ND O.10
NA
ND 4.18
•»9"-
BQL 1O40
< 1930
ND 554
1O7OO
ND 554
ND 554
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
SS9 Boiler
combustion air
259
572
1.20
216
-
-
|io/dscm
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
ngfdacm
425OO
< 4660
< 46OO
267O
< 22OO
ND 210
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
(refer to Abbreviations and Symbols table at beginning of report for toy to abbreviations)
-------
TABLE 5-16. (continued)
Condition 2 Run 1
Sampling location
Description
Total mass flow, kg/hr
Total mass flow, Ib/hr
Density, g/L
Volumetric (low, dscm/hr
Volumetric (low, L/hr
Moisture, wt %
SEMI-VOLATILE ORGANICS
Fluoranthene
Hexachlorobenzene
Naphthalene
Phenan throne
Pyrene
Total chtorobenzenes
Total chlorophenols
Total PAH's
Total PCB's (mono-deca)
Total PCB's (tri-deca)
Total PCDD/PCDF (by laomer)
1,2,4 -Trichlorobenzene
VOLATILE ORGANICS
Benzene
Methyl chloride
Tetrachloroethene
Toluene
Trtchloroethene
Vinyl chloride
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Beryllium
Cadmium
Chromium (total)
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Phosphorus
Selenium
Silver
Thallium
Tin
Zinc
Intermediate streams
SS11
Reactor grit
O.O414
0.0912
22O4
-
-
1.0
vgfca
12OOOO
BQL 3100
SQL 17000
120000
380OO
< 21700
< 285OO
< 354000
< 44OO
< 363O
< O.5O4
BQL 1700
fiSfcg
19O
79
23
BQL 16
90
10
H9"-
ND 5
46
63
ND 0.05
2.2
71
61
23
60O
ND 0.1
120
590
ND 5
ND 0.5
22
NA
64
SS14
Reformed gas
7.44
16.4
0.561
13.3
lig/dscm
NA
ND 4.05
NA
NA
NA
ND 74.2
ND 152
NA
< 1.26
< 1.08
< O.0003
ND 9.86
SAT
INT
< 199
< 159OO
INT
INT
9t
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
SS19
TDU off-gas
-
-
ugfdscm
NA
E 74369
NA
NA
NA
< 394OOO
< 158OO
NA
14700
12300
< 16.7
34.5
SAT
INT
< 1880
SAT 7780000
INT/SAT
INT
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
SS2O
Molten bath
O
0
5750
-
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
ppm
ND 30
ND 20
ND 1
ND O.O2
ND 1
ND 2
98
160
ND 1
ND 0.4
ND 2
380
ND 20
ND 1
ND 30
40
12
SS22
Scrubber liquor
5.81
12.8
985
—
5.89
M9A-
630
ND 20
41O
90O
780
ND 220
ND 300
< 4120
< 26.2
< 26.1
< O.O01
ND 2O
H9-">-
340
ND 10
ND 10
ND 10
ND 10
ND 10
M9t-
ND 10O
ND 1OO
15
ND 10
ND 10
37
34O
130
190
1.4
92
ND 1OO
ND 1OO
ND 10
ND 100
25O
13OO
Output streams
SS1O
Treated soil
127
280
—
_
28
tts/fcg
ND 90OO
48OOOOO
ND 90OO
ND 9000
ND 9OOO
< 490OOOO
ND 135OOO
ND 1800OO
292OO
28OOO
< 634
ND 9000
US/kg
ND 28
14O
ND 28
BQL 36
220
BQL 81
mg/kg
9.6
19
88
0.31
1
26
6O
17O
280
O.24
28
1BOO
ND 7.4
ND 0.74
8.5
64OO
4OO
SS12
Scrubber sludge
O.487
1.03
22OO
O.212
54
H9"
-------
TABLE 5-16. (continued)
Condition 2 Run 2
Sampling location
Description
Total mass flow, kg/hr
Total mass flow, Ib/hr
Density, g/L
Volumetric flow, dscm/nr
Volumetric flow, l/hr '
Moisture, wt %
SEMI-VOLATILE ORGANICS
-luoranthene
Hexachlorobenzene
Naphthalene
Phenan throne
Pyrene
Total chlorobenzenes
Total chtorophenols
Total PAH's
Total PCB'a (mono-deca)
Total PCB's (tri-deca)
Total PCDD/PCDF (by Isomer)
1,2,4 -Trlchlorobenzene
VOLATILE ORGANICS
Benzene
Methyl chloride
Tetrachloroethene
Toluene
Trtehloroethene
Vinyl chloride
METALS
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Beryllium
Cadmium
Chromium (total)
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Phosphorus
Selenium
Silver
Thallium
Tin
Zinc
Input streams
SS3
Site soil
23.
52.
2
ug/kg
ND 890
13000
ND 890
ND 890
ND 890
< 219OO
ND 1340O
ND 1780O
< 7160OO
< 682OOO
•e 0.41
ND 89O
ND 28
ALR 27OO
ND 28
ALR. 5900
ALR 62000
ALR 2700
ND -7.4
13
5O
0.27
ND O.7
15
30
72
25O.OO
ND 0
20
340
ND 7.4
ND 0.74
ND 7
34
490
SS4 Scrubber
Caustic
23.
52.
1OSO
22.
gfl-
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
g/L
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
ND 100
ND 100
ND 10
ND 1O
ND 10
13
63O
ND 50
16
ND O.2
43
ND 100
ND 100
ND 10
ND 100
ND 100
46O
SS6
Propane
13.
3O.
1.7
7.85
ug/dscm
NA
ND 0.42
NA
NA
NA
ND 6.82
ND 14.2
NA
< 1.47
< 1.44
NA
ND O.68
ND 6.5
ND 0.8
ND 0.8
ND 13
ND 0.8
ND ~ O.8
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
SS7
Hydrogen
O.O85.
O.18
O.O8
1.O
Itg/dscm
NA
ND 1.9
NA
NA
NA
ND 37.9
ND 69.6
NA
ND 0.11
ND 0.10
NA
ND 4.18
BQL 1040
< 1930
ND 554
1O700
ND 554
ND 554
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
SS9 Boiler
combustion air
37
81
1.20
3Ofl
ug/dscm
NA
=MPC O.66
NA
NA
NA
< 2.19
< 2.78
NA
< 1.23
< 1.11
NA
ND 0.15
ng/dscm
< 683OO
< 346O
< 697OO
< 423O
< 1O9O
ND 6O3
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
(rsJsr to Abbreviations and Symbols table at beginning of report for key to abbreviations)
-------
TABLE 5-16. (continued)
Condition 2 Run 2
Description
Total mass flow. Ib/hr
Density, gfL
Volumetric flow, dscm/hr
Volumetric flow, L/hr
Moisture. wL %
SEMI-VOLATILE ORGANICS
Fluoranlhene
-lexachlorobenzene
Naphthalene
Phertan throne
^rene
Total chlorobenzenes
Total chlorophsnols
Total PAH's
Total PCB's (mono-deca)
Total PCB's (tri-daca)
Total PCDD/PCDF (by Isomer)
1,2,4 -Trtchlorobenzene
VOLATILE ORGANICS
Benzene
Methyl chloride
Tetrachlotoethene
Toluene
Trtchloroethene
Vinyl chloride
PETALS
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Beryllium
Cadmium
Chromium (total)
Copper
.ead
Manganese
Mercury
llckel
Phosphorus
Selenium
Silver
halllum
in
In
Zinc
Intermediate streams
SS11
Reactor grit
0.0439
O.0968
22OO
1.0
M9"
-------
TABLE 5-16. (continued)
Condition 3
Sampling location
Description
Total mass flow, Ib/hr
Density, g/L
Volumetric flow, dscm/hr
Volumetric flow, L/hr
Moisture, wt. %
SEMI-VOLATILE ORGANICS
Fluoranthene
Hexachloro benzene
Naphthalene
Phenanthrene
'yrene
Total chlorobenzenes
Total chlorophenols
Total PAH's
Total PCB's (mono-deca)
Total PCB's (tri-deca)
Total PCDD/PCDF (by isomer)
1 ,2,4 -Trlchlorobenzene
VOLATILE ORGANICS
Benzene
Methyl chloride
Tetrachloroethene
Toluene
"richloroethene
Vinyl chloride
METALS
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Jen/Ilium
Cadmium
Chromium (total)
Copper
.ead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
3hosphorus
Selenium
Silver
Thallium
Tin
Zinc
Input streams
SS1
Waste water
133
294
97
13
M9/1-
< 1.7
NO 0.9
< 3.46
< 2.38
< 1.5
ND 10.8
ND 14.7
< 24.8
< 25.2
< 22.3
< 1.57
ND 0.98
ug/L
< 8.7
< 2.3
< 4.3
< 4.3
ND 2
ND 2
"Q/t-
ND 100
ND 117
530
ND 10
ND 10
< 33
1O5
187
< 632
ND 0
ND 33
730
ND 100
ND 10
ND 1OO
ND 100
1107
SS2
Waste oil
23.
50.
1OOO
23.
M0fca
ND 10000
ND 10000
BQL 56OOO
ND 10OOO
ND 10OOO
< 235000
ND 15OOOO
< 366OOO
2.54E+08
2.41 E+08
< 393
BQL 95000
gn-
ND 2
30
ND 2
BQL 7
200
ND 2
mg/kg
ND 10
ND 10
6
ND 1
1
15
9
120
ND 1
0.26
4.30
28O
ND 10
ND 1
ND 10
11
1OO
SS4 Scrubbe
caustic
11
25
105
11
9/L
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
g/L
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
9/L
ND 100
ND 100
ND 10
ND 10
ND 10
13
630
ND 50
16
ND 0.2
43
ND 100
ND 100
ND 1O
ND 1OO
ND 100
460
SS5 Scrubber
make-up water
178
393
980
182
g/L
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
g/L
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
S'L
ND 100
ND 100
ND 10
ND 10
ND 10
ND 10
65
ND 50
ND 10
ND 0.2
ND 10
ND 10O
ND 100
ND 10
ND 100
ND 1OO
16
SS6
12.
28.
1.7
7.3
Mg/dscm
NA
ND 0.4
NA
NA
NA
ND 6.82
ND 14.2
NA
< 1.47
< 1.44
NA
ND 0.68
M9/L
ND 6.5
ND 0.8
ND 0.8
ND 13
ND 0.8
ND 0.8
ns/L
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
(refer to Abbreviations and Symbols table at beginning of report for key to abbreviations) "
SS7
O.O71
0.1 58
O.083
O.860
Mg/dscm
NA
ND 1.9
NA
NA
NA
ND 37.9
ND 69.6
NA
ND O.11
ND 0.1O
NA
ND 4.18
MO/L
BQL 1040
< 193O
ND 554
107OO
ND 554
ND 554
NA
: NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
SS9 Boiler
332
732
1.2O
276
Mg/dscm
NA
ND O.83
NA
NA
NA
ND 62
ND 12.38
NA •
ND 0.15
ND o.o;
NA
t*tn
ND 0.56
ng/dscm
ALR 1158OO
< 1731
BQL 1O91
4O30
ND 504
ND 672
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
IMA
i^w^
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
-------
TABLE 5-1S. (continued)
Condition 3
Sampling location
Description
Total mass flow, kg/hr
Total mass flow, Ib/hr
Density, g/L
Volumetric flow, dscm/hr
Volumetric flow, L/hr
Moisture, wt. %
SEMI-VOLATILE ORGANICS
Fluoranlhene
Hexachloro benzene
Naphthalene
Phenanthrene
Pyrene
Total chlorpbenzenea
Total chlorophenols
Total PAH's
Total PCB's (mono-deca)
Total PCB's (tri-deca)
Total PCDD/PCDF (by isomer)
1,2,4 -Trichlorobenzene
VOLATILE ORGANICS
Benzene
Methyl chloride
Tetrachloroetnene
Toluene
Trichloroethene
Vinyl chloride
METALS
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Beryllium
Cadmium
Chromium (total)
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Phosphorus
Selenium
Stiver
Thallium
Tin
Zinc
Intermediate Streams
SS11
Reactor grit
0.1 0
0.222
220
• . -
2
M9*a
170OOO
ND 1300O
SQL 85000
220OOO
BQL 93OOO
ND 144OOO
ND 196000
< 846OOO
< 3310
< 1670
< 162
ND 13OOO
Mgfcg
ALR 17000
210
ND 20
ND 20
ND 20
ND 20
ND 5
23
30
ND 0.5
ND 0.5
27
10
6.7
330
ND 0.1
100
300
ND 5
ND 0.5
8
21
25
SS14
Reformed gas
16.5
36.4
0.497
33.2
• -
-
ng/dscm
NA
ND 6.92
NA
NA
NA
ND 18.8
ND 28.3
NA
< 32.6
< 27.5
< 0.000162
ND 0.97
ug/dscm
1781000
< 116.5
< 2481
69970
< 2O.28
< 33669
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
SS15 - Reformed
Gas condensate
0.440
0.970
1000
-
0.44O
-
Mflrt-
BQL 5700
ND 960
61OOOOO
170OO
BQL 5800
ND 10540
ND 14380
< 6420OOO
< 16800
< 16750
ND O.OO34
ND 960
mg/L
ALR 819
ND 3.75
BQL 7.75
< 25.O2
ND 3.75
ND 3.75
M9/L
ND 100
ND 100
43
ND 10
12
16
5300
4600
170
7.4
23
520
ND 100
ND 10
ND 100
ND 100
82OO
SS1 8 Heat ex-
changer residue
0
i
10OO
-
—
-
VQfi-
ND 1.2
ND 1.2
21
ND 1.2
ND 1.2
ND 13.1
ND 17.9
< 43.8O
< 1O.79
< 9.82
< O.OOO53
ND 1.2
MOt
120
ND 2
ND 2
ALR 45O
ND 2
ND 2
W3fi-
ND 100
ND 100
640
ND 10
ND 10
18
61
51
300
0.37
32
640
ND 100
ND 10
ND 100
ND 100
2200
SS22
Scrubber liquor
8.57
18.9
984
_
8.7
-
M8/L
2410
ND 21.3
516O
33OO
2697
ND 235
ND 363
< 2O3OO
< 48.9
< 48.4
< 0.001
ND 21.3
Mg/L
< 347
< 4.7
< 7
< 25.7
ND 4.7
ND 4.7
MO"-
ND 100
< 110
33.7
ND 10
ND 10
< 130
213
497
400
< 0.52
38
< 199
ND 10O
ND 10
ND 100
< 137
30O7
Output Streams
SS12
Scrubber sludge
22.0
48.6
2200
1O.O
96
pgftg
440000O
ND 16OOOO
QS 11OOOOOO
520OOOO
6300000
ND 176OOOO
ND 24OOOOO
< 40700000
< 17665
< 17470
< 1.92
ND 160OOO
wfcg
ND 18
ND 18
ND 18
ND 18
ND 18
ND 18
MS/kg
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
(refer to Abbreviations and Symbols table at beginning of report for key to abbreviations) ~~~~ ""
SS13 Scrubber
decant water
352
776
990
_
355
-
ugA-
59
ND 1.1
13OOO
ALR 150
64
ND 12.2
ND 15.5
< 152OO
< 4O.6
< 39.4
< O.OO013
ND 1.1
Mgfl-
ALR 7700
ND 2
BQL 4
- 22O
ND 2
ND 2
MO/L
ND 100
ND 100
15
ND 10
ND 10
ND 10
2O
ND SO
16
ND 0.2
190
ND 100
ND 100
ND 10
ND 100
ND 100
12O
SS16
Boiler Hue gas
347
764
1.19
263
6.7?
Ijg/dscm
ND 0.72
ND 0.64
< 2.36
ND 0.76
ND 0.77
ND 4.48
ND 826
< 24.O4
< ' 1.23
< 1.14
< O.OOO2
ND 0.43
|ig/dscm
< 113
" < 100
< 4.51
< • 1 4.7
< 1 .52
ND 1.01
lig/dscm |ig/L
< 5.13
ND 4.42
< 1.17
ND 0.04
< 0.99
< O.93
< 1.52
< 3.9*4
< 2.12
< 0.06
< 0.76
< 6.31
ND 4.42
ND " O.44
ND 4.42
< 4.42
-------
coUectvon, since the grit collector was not insulated for part of condition and condensation of
organic compounds may have occurred. In any case this stream represented an extremely small quantity
during this demonstration.
Reformed Gas Quality
4
The reformed gas produced by the reduction process was analyzed for fixed gases and common
hydrocarbons to characterize its fuel value. Characteristics of the reformed gas are compared to other
common gaseous fuels in Table 5-17. The fuels are ranked according to their volumetric heating value
(Btu/scf). The reformed gas is a medium Btu gas. The gas produced during the Demonstration had an
average heating value ranging from 269 to 376 Btu/scf, comparable to blue water gas. The high hydrogen
content of the reformed gas, beneficial for flame stability, makes it a moderately attractive medium Btu
fuel. The volumetric heating value of the reformed gas is 24 to 33 percent that of natural gas, which would
likely preclude its use as a direct replacement for high Btu fuels such as propane, butane, or natural gas.
TABLE 5-17. COMPARISON OF REFORMED GAS QUALITY TO OTHER GASEOUS FUELS
Gaseous Fuels
Natural gas- {15.8% C2H6)
Cote-oven gas
Coal gas
Eco Logic Condition 3 • average
Eco Logic Condition 2 • Run 1
Carb. water gas
Eco Logic Condition 2 • Run 2
Blue water gas
Eco Logic Condition 1 • Average
Producer gas
Blast furnace gas
Composition, percent by volume
H2
•
465
54.6
55.7
6M
40.5
623
47.3
41.1
14.0
1.0
N2
0.8
8.1
4.4
13.7
1&3
2.9
25.0
8.3
33.7
50.9
60.0
02
•
0.6
02
0.06
002
0.5
001
0.7
005
0.6
-
CH4
83.4
321
242
16J
7A
102
6J
1.3
112
3.0
-
CO
-
6.3
10.9
ao
3,0
34.0
3.7
37.0
5.1
28.0
27.5
CO?
-
22
3.0
33
13
3.0
1.8
5.4
6.7
4.5
11,5
C2H4
- •
as
15
07
01
6.1
00
-
04
-
-
C6H6
•
05
1.3
•
•
2.8
..
•
•
•
•
Molecular
weight of
fuel
18.3
13.7
1Z1
11.6
100
18.3
112
164
16.7
24.7
29.6
Higher
heating
value
Btu/lbm
24,100
17,100
16,500
12£10
11520
11,350
9,600
6550
6250
2,470
1,170
Higher
heating
value
Btu/scf
1,136
603
514
376
296
535
5!77
277
S&
157
39
Note: Typical values for other fuels taken from: "Engineering Experimentation", G.L. Tuve and L.C.
Domholdt McGraw-Hill Book Company, 1966; and "The Internal Combustion Engine", 2nd Ed., C.F.
Taylor and E.S. Taylor, International Textbook Co., 1961.
Trace organic substances were also measured to address possible contamination issues. The
concentrations of organic contaminants, which were detected in the reformed gas, are presented in Table
5-18. Significant concentrations of benzene (522 mg/dscm and 1,780 mg/dscm for Conditions 1 and 3,
respectively) and toluene (<12 mg/dscm to 159 mg/dscm) were measured. Benzene was present in
5-52
-------
amounts sufficient to saturate the measurement method; therefore, the rhaximum levels could not be
quantified. The appearance of significant quantities of benzene, a major intermediate product of the
reduction process, is expected. Trace levels of vinyl chloride (< 4.15 ug/dscm and < 33,700 ug/dscm for
Conditions 1 and 3) also were detected. The vinyl chloride results may be suspect due to analytical
interferences.
TABLE 5-18. TRACE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS DETECTED IN REFORMED GAS
Substance
RGBs (mono-deca)
Dioxins/furans
Total chlorobenzene
Ethyfbenzene
Benzene
Toluene
Vinyl chloride,
Perchloroethylene
Units
ug/dscm
ng/dscm
H9/dscm
ug/dscm
mg/dscm
mg/dscm
Ug/dscm
ng/dscm
Condition 1
Average
< 2.84
< 1.49
ND 312
< : 182
SAT 522
< 12.0
< 4.15
< 8.89
Condition 2
Run 1
< 1.26
< 0.27
ND 74.2
< 12.6
SAT
< 15.9
INT
< 199
Condition 2
Run 2
< 1.78
< 0.81
ND 98.1
69.2
SAT
159
< 333
59.7
Conditions
Avorsod
< 32.6
< 0.16
ND 18.8
2950
1780
70.0
< 33700
< 2480
SSS
Prooflns
< 1.47
not analyzed
ND 6.82
BQL 2600
ND 6.5
ND 13
M) 800
ND 800
Note: This is a partial list of the compounds which were detected in the reformed gas. For a complete list please refer to
Appendix 2.
PROCESS CONSIDERATIONS
Scale-Up Parameters
The Demonstration was conducted on a pilot-scale unit. Commercial applications are expected to
require larger unit capacity than the Demonstration unit. Scale up of the process may affect performance.
Therefore, selected process scale-up parameters were documented during this demonstration to provide
a basis for comparing performance of a full-scale commercial unit with these Demonstration results:
• Reactor: residence time, temperature
• Scrubber liquid-to-gas ratio, type
• Thermal Desorption Unit: Residence time, temperature.
Reactor Scale-Up—
The design of any chemical reactor in which reactions are kinetically limited involves specification of
residence time, temperature, and mixing. In the Eco Logic reactor, mixing is dictated by the physical
design of the reactor and gas inlet configuration. The details of the reactor design are proprietary.
5-53
-------
Temperature in (he reactor is a key operating parameter which was monitored via direct measurement and
controlled throughout the tests. Residence time in the reaction zone from the reactor through insulated
duct work up to the scrubber) is dictated by the volume of the zone, and the volumetric flow rate of the
gases. Residence time was calculated from estimated gas flow rate and gas temperature during the
tests. Residence time and temperature of the process were discussed earlier in Sections 3 and 4.
Scrubber Scale-Up—
The performance of wet scrubbers is mass-diffusion-limited and, therefore, primarily a function of
liquid-gas contacting. Liquid-gas contacting is achieved in packed bed scrubbers by the design of the
bed, packing material, and scrubber liquor flow rate. The packing material used in the scrubber was a
standard C-type polypropylene packing material. The scrubber liquor flow rate, expressed as the liquid
to gas mass ratio, ranged from 70 to 90 L/acm galtecf (0.5 to 0.7) during the tests.
Thermal Desorptlon Unit Scale-Up —
Because of the developmental nature of the TDU, design details are proprietary and no process
scale-up parameters were isolated.
.Chemical lonlzation Mass Spectrometer Validation
One of the program objectives was to validate the chemical ionization mass spectrometer (CIMS) as
a viable tool to continuously evaluate the state of destruction within the reactor, to enable the operator to
track reactor destruction performance, and to alert the operator and process controller to incidents or
process upsets. The CIMS uses chemical bnization mass spectrometry for gas analysis. This type of
ionization produces ions without fragmenting the molecules into daughter ions, thus enabling easier
identification of sample gas components. A sample is extracted from the gas stream, filtered, and
delivered to the CIMS. The entire sampling system is heated to prevent condensation.
Validation tests of the CIMS were conducted by independently sampling the reformed gas stream
(SS14) and comparing these results with the CIMS response, averaged over the sampling period. The
results (Table 5-19) were fitted to a linear regression curve, and the correlation coefficient -R2 - shows no
correlation between the CIMS and reference method results for dichlorobenzene and trichlorobenzene.
A moderately good correlation for chlorobenzene was seen; however, the correlation was far from one to
one. As can be seen in Figure 5-8, the CIMS indicated absolute chlorobenzene concentrations over an
5-54
-------
(Millions)
14O.OOO -T-
2O.OOO
O.OOO
Chlorobenzene
O.OOO 0.500 1.0OO 1.500 2.OOO
VOST (ng/dscm)
2.500
3.OOO
3.500
Figure 5-8. Comparison of CIMS response to VOST measurements for chlorobenzene.
-------
order of magnitude higher than the reference method. Despite this discrepancy, CJMS appears useful
as a qualitative trend indicator based on these extremely limited data.
TABLE 5-19. ELI CIMS VALIDATION
Test
Condition 1
Run1
Run 2
Run 3
Condition 2
Run1
Run 2
Condition 3
Run1
Run 2
Run 3
R*2
TnTSi
nj
CIMS
1.68E+07
9.26E+06
2.68E+07
1.45E-I05
1.03E406
1.03E408
1.18E+08
2.63E407
ydscrh
VOST
NO 1.94E-»03
< 8.38E-f04
3.24E405
< 7.30E+03
ND 2.08E403
Dicio
nt
CIMS
3.37E+Q7
7.45E403
3.85E-f07
7.35E407
7.80E-*07
rooenzene
j/dscm
VOST
ND 5.81E+03
< 2.59E+04
ND 6.13E+03
ND 6.28E403
ND 6.23E+03
TriChlC
JUj
CIMS
2.79E-KJ5
6.64E405
1.68E+06
429E406
626E405
3.20E406
2.03E406
1.12E406
0.832
5.09E-fQ7
3.92E407
2.95E4Q7
< 7.58E+04
< 4.20E+04
< 3.66E+04
0.04
4.19E-»06
2.36E406
1.36E405
ro twnzene
XAD-2
ND 1.13IE402
ND 1.42E402
ND 4.11E*01
ND 3.05E401
ND 2J5E401
ND 1.14E-401
ND Z15E-fOO
ND 9.62EI400
0.20
System Reliability
For this program, system reliability was evaluated, based on three criteria:
• Waste Feed Rate—The actual waste feed rate compared to the test target waste feed rate;
• Availability-Availability of the system to process waste; and
• Destruction Efficiency—The reliability of the system to meet destruction efficiency objectives.
Waste Feed Rate-
The respective planned and demonstrated waste feed rates for each run are compared in Table
5-20. Actual feed rates during the Demonstration, based on process design and preliminary waste
characteristics were substantially less than planned. For Condition 1, the waste water feed rate ranged
from approximately 29 to 55 percent of the planned feed rate. Besides falling considerably below the
target, the run-to-run variability was also much greater. This may be due in part to start-up problems,
which were still being resolved during the Condition 1 tests, and due to lack of an on-line flow
measurement of the waste water. The feed rate of soil during Condition 2 tests was also substantially
below target levels, primarily due to deficiencies in TDU operation. Waste oil feed rate during Condition
3 tests was approximately 35 to 45 percent of the planned value, but the total amount of waste oil
processed was close to the target value. It should be noted that these waste oil feed rates would not
5-56
-------
be sustainable for more than a few hours without increasing the capacity of the reformed gas handling
systems (i.e., compressed storage, auxiliary boiler). The actual PCB concentration was also substantially
lower than expected, because the actual PCB concentration in the waste oil was only 25.4 percent,
compared to the level of 39 percent measured before the Demonstration. As a resuft of the tower feed
rates, the total amount of waste water and soil processed was substantially tower than planned. Thus, the
reliability of the system to process the planned amount of waste within the planned period could not be
demonstrated.
TABLE 5-20. WASTE FEED INPUTS
Waste Type
Water and Oil
Soil
Oil
Test Number
cTni
C1-R2
C1-R3
C2-R1
C2-R2
C3-R1
C3-R2
C3-R3
Actual
ko/min
1.47
2.78
1.03
2.12
0.40
0.355
0.447
0.353
Planned
kq/min
5.05
5.05
5.05
10
10
1
1
1
% Achievement
29.1
55.0
20.4
21.2
4.0
35.5
447
35.3
Availability-
Availability of the process was calculated by comparing of the actual and planned amount of time
needed to complete the tests. The availability was examined for four test phases:
Performance Test:
Reliability Test:
Test Prep/Recovery:
Down Days:
Days to perform performance test runs;
Days to perform 72-hour reliability test;
Days to recover samples, ship samples, and prepare sampling trains; and
Days where the unit was down for maintenance. These days were typically
planned for Sundays in a weekly schedule.
As seen in Table 5-21, the unit very closely followed the planned schedule. One test during the TDU
performance tests was canceled. The total number of down days was more than 4 times the planned
number. However, most of these were due to TDU installation and resolution of feed hopper problems.
Down days for maintenance were doubled due to three unscheduled maintenance days. At the
completion of the performance tests, a continuous 72-hour reliability test was conducted. During this test,
the unit did not experience any problems in maintaining operation. Overall, with the exception of the
TDU segment of the Demonstration, the availability of the unit was considered good.
5-57
-------
TABLE 5-21. UNIT AVAILABILITY
Test Phase
Performance tests
Reliability tests
Test Prep/recovery
Down days:
Scheduled maintenance
Unscheduled maintenance
Compressor installation
TDU installation
TDU hopper problems
Total
Planned
Days
9
3
9
i
3
0
0
7
0
10
Actual
Days
8
\f
•3
8 -
3
3
w
1
31
4
42
Destruction Efficiency—
The system achieved most of the program objectives for DE and ORE, as discussed
report. The ELI process demonstrated 99.9999 percent ORE for PCB for almost
99.99 percent DE of surrogate compounds for almost all of the runs in which surrogat
Thus, the reliability of the process destruction was excellent.
Kev Cost Assumptions
earlier in this
all of the runs, and
e spiking occurred.
The economic analysis of the ELi Gas-Phase Chemical Reduction Process
categories:
encompasses 12 cost
Site preparation - including site design and layout, surveys, site i
access rights and access roads, preparations for support facilities,
connections, and auxiliary buildings;
investigations, legal searches,
decontamination facilities, utility
Permitting and regulatory requirements - including permits,
development of monitoring and analytical protocols and procedures;
Capital equipment - broken out by subsystems and major equipment items
equipment, materials handling equipment, and residual streams handling
specifications;
system monitoring requirements, and
including process
equipment, including
Startup and fixed costs - broken out by categories, such as mobilization,
working capital, depreciation, taxes, and implementation of environmental moi
shakedown, testing,
initoring programs;
5-58
-------
• Labor - supervisory and administrative staff, professional staff, technical expert, maintenance
personnel, and clerical support;
• Supplies and consumables-raw materials, fuel, chemicals, etc;
• Utilities-electric, water, steam, etc. (quantities consumed);
• Effluent treatment and disposal • both on-site and off-site facility costs including wastewater
disposal and monitoring activities;
• Residual waste shipping, handling, and transport, (including the preparation of shipping and
actual waste disposal charges);
• Analytical services - laboratory analyses for operations and environmental monitoring;
• Facility modification, repair, replacement - design adjustments, facility modifications, scheduled
maintenance, and equipment replacement; and
• Site demobilization - shutdown, site cleanup, restoration, permanent storage costs, and site
security.
The Demonstration generated data such as consumption of electricity, hydrogen, and other
consumables which are key inputs to the economic analysis of the process. The economic analysis of the
ELI process is presented in the Applications Analysis Report.
PERMIT CONDITIONS
TSCA Permit
In order to conduct the Demonstration with actual PCB-contaminated wastes, ELI obtained a permit
under the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) of 1976. Many of the conditions were based on the
sampling and analysis results obtained during other demonstrations. Table 5-22 compares the TSCA
permit conditions with those observed during the Demonstration. All of the TSCA permit conditions were
achieved.
5-59
-------
TABLE 5-22. RESPONSIVENESS TO TSCA PERMIT
Conditions of approval
Aroclors
ea
Condition mst
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
reea STOCK resiictions:
Less then 30 tons of PCB-contaminated material (oil, water, and soil)
Less then 130 gal. DNAPL oil
Concentration of DNAPL oil, in the ground water, of less then 10.000 ppm
i reatea materials:
Limit PCBs in ground water to below 3 ppb/congener and/or total Aroclors
Limit PCBs in soil and DNAPL oil matrices to levels below 2 ppm/congener and/or total Aroclors
ELI shall dispose of all material at EPA-aporoved TSCA disoosal facilities
process Monitoring mecording:
Quantity and concentration of PCBs in process feed stocks
Quantity and concentration of PCBs in process wastes.
Concentrations of PCBs at the exhaust of the unit, and PCB exposure in the working area
Temperature of the reduction reaction, name of the operator and supervisor
Michigan Department of Natural Resources Parmlt
One of the program objectives was to document unit compliance with the Michigan Department of
Natural Resources (MDNR) Air Permit conditions. Permit No. 1261-91 was issued to ELI Eco Logic
International Inc. for the disposal of PCBs. The permit conditions included limits for both concentration
(mg/dscm) and emission rate (Ibs/hr). Some of these emissions limits were based on information
provided by ELI to the MDNR from previous test programs, rather than by an MDNR policy or
regulation.
Table 5-23 compares the MDNR permit conditions against demonstration results. The process was
able to meet nearly all of the permit conditions. HCI, THC, CO, and PCB emissions easily met the
requirements of the MDNR air permit. Stack concentrations of benzene and the 1,2,4-trichlorobenzene
exceeded the limits in the permit, but emission rates were within the permit limits. It should be noted
that the 1,2,4-trichlorobenzene results were below the analytical detection limit and therefore represent
maximum possible emissions, and were only slightly above the permit limit for one test condition. In
certain cases, the limitation for maximum system oxygen concentration (0.04 percent) was exceeded,
although this is believed to be due to oxygen analyzer problems and not actual system conditions.
5-60
-------
TABLE 5-23. MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES AIR PERMIT CONDITIONS
r emissions
<
missives
CD
0.
35
>8
yes
>85O
< 10
<0.04
<16
100
yes
>3.0
<1000
<100
Condition 1
(average)
ND 0.60
ND 0.00024
12.8
0.0036
20.6
O.0097
< 0.00012
< 4.9E-08
< 61
< 0.000025
ND 1.3
ND 5.2E-07
0
46
8.8
yes
892
1.82
0.05
11.60
110
yes
9.0
< O.O19
ND 0.00019
Condition 2
Run 1
ND 0.80
ND 0.00037
0.9
0.00027
8.0
0.0043
< 0.000076
< 3.5E-08
< 1.9
< 0.000001
ND 0.90
ND 4.1E-07
N/A
45
8.4
yes
890
2.23
0.02
10.23
11O
yes
5.8
< O.OO1
ND 0.00019
Condition 2
Run 2
ND 0.46
ND 0.00030
0.4
0.00016
11.5
0.0088
< 0.001 1
< 7.2E-07
< 5.4
< 0.000004
ND 0.98
ND 6.4E-07
N/A
37
8.4
yes
89O
2.69
0.01
8.09
110
yes
9.6
< 0.002
ND 0.00019
Condition 3
(average)
< 0.78
< 0.00044
1.5
0.00055
2.2
0.0017
< 0.001 1
< 5.9E-07
> 109
> 0.000063
ND 0.41
ND 2.7E-07
0
42
9.3
yes
933
1.80
0.06
7.81
11O
yes
6.1
> O.034
ND 0.00020
Average
(Note 3)
< 0.67
< 0.00034
5.5
0.0016
11.0
0.0059
< 0.00060
< 3.3E-07
> 65
> 0.000034
ND 0.88
ND 4.3E-07
0
42
8.9
yes
907
1.97
0.045
9.57
11O
yes
7.6
> 0.020
ND 0.00019
Notes:
(1) Concentrations are corrected to 70°F and 29.92 in. Hg, as specified in permit, and are on a dry basis.
elsewhere in the report are corrected to 20°C (68°F) and 760 mm Hg (29.92 in. Hg). as specified in U
(2) Concentrations are reported on a dry, as measured (not corrected to constant dilution) basis.
(3) Average of all test runs.
(4) Permit limit specifies chlorobenzenes as 1,2,4-trichlorobenzene.
(5) Measured at the scrubber liquor tank (monitoring station 5, see Figure 3-4).
Concentrations reported
.S. EPA test methods.
-------
This page intentionally left blank
5-62
-------
SECTION 6
QUALITY ASSURANCE/QUALITY CONTROL
QA/QC DEFINITIONS
f
Quality assurance (QA) and quality control (QC) activities are distinguished in that the former are
preventive in nature, while the latter are corrective. QA consists of those activities that are employed
before and during a process, method, or measurement activity in order to ensure that the results of those
activities are of a consistent quality. QC, on the other hand consists of those activities that validate and if
necessary correct the results of the process, method, or measurement. For example, when a chemist
makes three independent measurements of a sample, that is QA. When that chemist applies a statistical
test for outliers on the set of measurements, and decides whether to retain or reject each measurement,
thatisQC.
The Category II Quality Assurance Project Plan (QAPP) for this project specified the QA objectives
and QA/QC activities needed to ensure data quality is commensurate with the project objectives. In
addition, external audits conducted in the field by the EPA and at the main analytical laboratories further
assured data of acceptable quality. Overall, the QA/QC data indicated that the measured data are
considered acceptable and defensible.
QUALITY ASSURANCE OBJECTIVES
QA objectives are either quantitative or qualitative statements that define the quality of data needed to
support the program goals. These objectives are used to support decisions concerning test validity and
adequacies with respect to project goals. Quantitative objectives are expressed in terms of accuracy,
precision, and completeness, as defined below.
Accuracy The degree of agreement of a measurement (or an average of measurements) of
- a parameter, X, with an accepted reference or true value, T. It is usually expressed
as the difference between two values, X-T, or the difference as a percentage,
6-1
-------
100(X-T)/T. It is also sometimes expressed as a ratio, X/T. Accuracy is a measure
of the bias or systematic distortion in a measurement.
Precision A measure of mutual agreement among individual measurements of the same
property, usually under similar prescribed conditions. Precision is usually
expressed in terms of standard deviation, variance, or range and in either
absolute or relative terms.
Completeness A measure of the amount of valid data obtained from a measurement system,
compared to the amount that was expected to be obtained under correct normal
conditions.
Table 6-1 presents the project objectives for precision, accuracy, and completeness.
PRECISION, ACCURACY, AND COMPLETENESS RESULTS
Data Presentation
Due to the wide variety and scope of measurements made in this program/several methods were
employed to determine precision and accuracy from the raw data. The basis for calculations, the
approach, and the equations used for precision and accuracy are given in Table 6-2. Summary tables of
the precision, accuracy, and completeness achieved for each of the sample locations are presented later
in this section. These summary tables will show the result, the basis for the calculation, the number of
samples or analyses used for the calculation, and the location of source data in Appendix 4.
Due to the very large amount of samples and results, a method of summarizing accuracy and precision
was developed for this report. For example, the accuracy and precision of PCB measurements in the solid
and liquid samples were based on matrix spikes (MS) and matrix spike duplicates (MSD). These MS and
MSDs included 10 congeners of PCBs (mono- through deca-) performed once for sample locations SS1,
SS2, SS3, SS24, twice for sample locations SS11, SS12, and three times for SS13, SS22. These results
total (1MS + 1MSD per set) x (10 PCB congeners) x 14 sets = 280 data points. Noting that this is only the
PCB data for these samples and not the CBs, CPs, PAHs, PCDDs/PCDFs, VOCs, metals, and other
analyses, the amount of data that would be presented in the main body of the report would be
overwhelming and of little use to the user.
6-2
-------
TABLE S-1. QUALITY ASSURANCE OBJECTIVES FOR ELI SITE DEMONSTRATION
Sample location
SS1 -waste water
SS2-wasteoil
SS3-contaminated soil
SSKMreatedsoil
SS11 -reactor grit
SS12-scrubber sludge
SS13-scrubber decant water
SS16-boiler flue gas
SS16-boiler flue gas
Compound
VOC
CP
CB
1
PAH's
PCDD/PCDF
PCB's
Total sulfur (as S)
Metals
Flue gas only
Particulate
HCI
02
C02
CO
NOx
S02
THC
Moisture
Temperature
Rowrate
Analytes
Average
PCE
Average
C6CI6
Average
Ag
As
Ba
Be
Cd
Or
Cu
Hg
Mn
Ni
3
Pb
Sb
Se
Sn
Tl
Zn
Precision
(%)
<50
<50
<50
<50
<50
<50
<50
<50
<10
<20
<20
<20
<20
<20
<20
<20
<20
<20
<20
<20
<20
<20
<20
<20
<20
<20
<20
<12
<10
<10
<10
<10
<20
<20
<10
•••
...
<•••
Accuracy
(%)
20-150
20-150
20-150
20-150
20-150
20-150
20-150
20-150
80-120
80-120
80-120
80-120
80-120
80-120
80-120
80-120
80-120
80-120
80-120
80-120
80-120
80-120
80 - 120
80-120
80-120
80-120
80 - 120
,
80-120
90-110
90-110
90-110
90-110
85-115
85-115
90-110
...
97-103
...
Completeness]
(%)
90
90
90
90
90
90
90
90
90
90
90
90
90
90
90
90
90
90
90
90
90
90
90
90
90
90
90
90
95
95
95
95
95
95
95
95
95
95
6-3
-------
TABLE 6-2. APPROACH FOR CALCULATION OF PRECISION AND ACCURACY
Objective
Precision
Precision
3recision
Precision
Precision
'recision
Precision
Accuracy
Accuracy
Basis of
Calculation
Audit
LCS/LCSD
Dup
RSD of bias
RSD of trains
MS/MSD
Field dup
Audit
LCS
Approach
The relative percent difference of the two audit results
determines the precision. In cases where there is more than
1 target analyte in the sample, such as VOC's where there is
5 analytes, the RPD's for each analyte are averaged.
The relative percent difference between the LCS recovery
and the LCSD recovery. In cases where there is more than 1
target analyte in the sample, such as organics, the RPD's for
each analyte are averaged.
Duplicate analysis and the relative percent difference
between the two results was used for precision. In cases
where there is more than 1 target analyte in the sample, such
as organics, the RPD's for each analyte are averaged.
Relative standard deviation of the bias check responses
Relative standard deviation of the moisture result from three
trains for each test run. These RSD's were then averaged for
all 8 runs.
The relative percent difference between the MS recovery and
he MSD recovery. In cases where there is more than 1
arget analyte in the sample, such as organics, the RPD's for
each analyte are averaqed.
Duplicate samples collected and the relative percent
difference between the two results was used for precision. In
cases where there is more than 1 target analyte in the
sample, such as organics, the RPD's for each analyte are
averaged.
The percent difference between the known value and the
esult is the accuracy. In cases where there is more than 1
arget analyte in the sample, such as organics, the
iff ere noes for each analyte are averaged.
The percent difference between the known value and the
esult is the accuracy. In cases where there is more than 1
arget analyte in the sample, such as organics. the
ifferences for each analyte are averaged.
Equation
(result 1 - result 2)/((result 1 + result 2V2)
abs(100*(LS recovery - LSD recovery)/((LS recovery +
LSD recovery }/2)
(result 1 - result 2V((result 1 + result 2V2)
Stdev(responses)/averaqe(responces) * 100
Average all test runs (stdev(moi8ture)/average(rnoistiire)
*100)
abs(100*(MS recovery - MSD recovery)/((MS recovery +
ASD recoveryV2)
result 1 - result 2V((resurt 1 + result 2V2)
00 + 100*((resurt - true valueVtrue value)
01 + 100*((result - true valueytrue value)
o>
.fk.
-------
TABLE 6-2. (continued)
Objective
Accuracy
Accuracy
Accuracy
Accuracy
Accuracy
Accuracy
Completeness
Basis of
Calculation
MS
LCS/LCSD
FS
PEA
MS/MSD
Surr
—
Approach
The percent difference between the known value and the
result is the accuracy. In cases where there is more than 1
target analyte in the sample, such as organics, the
differences for each analyte are averaged.
The percent difference for the LCS and the LCSD is
averaged. In cases where there is more than 1 target
analyte in the sample, such as organics, the differences for
each analyte are averaged.
The percent difference between the known value and the
result is the accuracy. When a frequency of more than 1 is
shown, the percent differences were averaged.
The measurement system is compared against a reference
standard. The percent difference between the known value
and the result is the accuracy.
The percent difference for the MS and the MSD is averaged.
n cases where there is more than 1 target analyte in the
sample, such as organics, the differences for each analyte
are averaged.
The average of all of the surrogate recoveries were used for
accuracy determination.
Always calculated as the percentage of valid data to
expected data
Equation
101 + 100*((result -true valueVtrue value)
1 00 + 1 00*((result - true valueVtrue value)
100 + 1 00*((result - true valueVtrue value) •
100 + 100*((result - true valueVtrue value)
100 + 100*((result -true valueVtrue value)
Average (all surrogate recoveries)
Valid data/expected data *100
o>
in
-------
The presentation of QA/QC results in this report can be illustrated by using the example above for
sample location SS13 to determine accuracy. The MS and MSD recoveries were averaged for each
congener, and the average congener recoveries were then averaged to obtain an average total PCB
recovery for each MS/MSD set. The average total PCB recoveries for each of the three MS/MSD sets
were then averaged to obtain the average PCB accuracy for SS13 achieved in this project. In this case,
this average result reflects the individual results achieved. In cases where the average result does not
adequately reflect the data quality, supporting discussion is provided in the text. The user is refen-ed to
Appendix 4 for more specific QA/QC data.
Boiler Flue Gas Results
Table 6-3 presents the accuracy, precision, and completeness achieved for the boiler flue gas
(SS16). Along with the result, the basis for the calculation , the number of samples that were used to
calculate the accuracy and precision, and the location where the raw data can be located in Appendix 4 are
given. In general, precision, accuracy, and completeness objectives were achieved for the boiler flue
gas, except as noted below.
voc-
VOC accuracy and precision results were within program objectives with the exception of vinyl
chloride. The accuracy obtained from the audit sample was 230.7%. Vinyl chloride is not a critical analyte.
The sampling and analysis for vinyl chloride is difficult due to its extremely low boiling point. The sampling
method that was used has not been demonstrated for compounds with boiling points less than 30°C,
although it is the most commonly used. This does not significantly affect the achievement of the project
objectives. The results indicate that vinyl chloride results for the stack may be biased high.
Trace Metals—
A range is given in Table 6-3 for metals accuracy. These results were obtained from two audit filters
supplied by the California Air Resources Board (CARB). Although the agency did not provide true values,
they did inform EER of the range achieved. Accuracy for barium and mercury did not meet the QA
objectives. This is not considered significant because CARB was still unsure of the stability of the mercury
in their audit sample and mercury and barium quantification was not a primary objective of the program. A
number of metals precision results were not determined because the analytes were not detected in both
the original analysis and the duplicate analysis.
6-6
-------
TABLE 6-3. SUMMARY OF PRECISION, ACCURACY, AND COMPLETENESS ACHIEVED
FOR BOILER FLUE GAS SAMPLES
Substance
VOC
PCE
CP
CB
06CI6
PAH
PCDD/PCDF
PCB
Metals
Ag
As
Ba
Be
Cd
Cr
Cu
Hg
Mn
Ni
P
Pb
Sb
Se
Sn
Tl
Zn
Particulate
HQ
02
C02
CO
NOx
S02
THC
Moisture
Temperature
Flow rate
Result
(%)
9.0
9.2
33.7
32.9
15.6
11.1
10.0
9.3
8.3
_
_
2.3
_
26*
6.0
2.6
—
_
8.6
_
_
7.4
-~
—
_.
5.1
—
_
0.5
0.3
2.9
1.7
2.7
2.6
10.1
—
_
Precision
Basis for
calculation
Audit
Audit
LCS/LCSD
LCS/LCSD
LCS/LCSD
LCS/LCSD
Dup
LCS/LCSD
Dup
Dup
Dup
Dup
Dup
Dup
Dup
Dup
Dup
Dup
Dup
Dup
Dup
Dup
Dup
Dup
Dup
Dup
—
—
RSDofbias
RSDofbias
RSDofbias
RSDofbias
RSDofbias
RSDofbias
RSD of trains
._
_
Frequenc
1
1
1
1
1
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1 .
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
_
_
3
3
3
3
3
3
8
_
_
Accuracy
Result
(%)
135.3
84.2
99.8
101.8
108.5
84.3
99.0
73.4
85-115
85-115
85-115
-66*
85-115
85-115
85-115
85-115
-33*
85-115
85-115
,85-115
85-115
85-115
85-115
85-115
85-115
85-115
22*
90-110
99.7
99.7
98.8
102.1
93.8
98.9
100.0
100.0
_
Basis for
calculation
Audit
Audit
LCS/LCSD
LCS/LCSD
LCS/LCSD
LCS/LCSD
LCS
LCS/LCSD
Audit
Audit
Audit
Audit
Audit
Audit
Audit
Audit
Audit
Audit
Audit
Audit
Audit
Audit
Audit
Audit
Audit
Audit
FS
Audit
Bias
Bias
Bias
Bias
Bias
Bias
PEA
PEA
—
Frequency
2
2
1
1
1
2
1
1
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
1
2
3
3
3
3
3
3
1
1
_
Completeness
{%)
91.6
91.6
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
66*
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
Appendix 4
location
Table 4-14
Table 4-14
Table 4-8
Table 4-8
Table 4-8
Table 4-8
Table 4-8,9
Table 4-8
Table 4-17
Table 4-17
Table 4-17
Table 4-17
Table 4-17
Table 4-17
Table 4-17
Table 4-17
Table 4-17
Table 4-17
Table 4-17
Table 4-17
Table 4-17
Table 4-17
Table 4-17
Table 4-17
Table 4-17
Table 4-17
•*.
,,,
Figure 4-5
Figure 4-5
Figure 4-5
Figure 4-5
Figure 4-5
Figure 4-5
w*
*•*
...
* Not achieved
— Not determined
Dup Laboratory duplicate
LCS Laboratory control spike
LCSD Laboratory control spike duplicate
Bias Bias checks
RSD Relative standard deviation
FS Field spike
Audit Audit sample
PEA Performance evaluation audit
6-7
-------
Participate Matter—
The boiler flue gas particulate accuracy objective was not achieved. This was attributed to difficulties
encountered with the field spike sample rather than a systematic problem in the test procedure. The
completeness objective for particulate emissions measurements was not achieved due to ripped filters on
the particulate train and an analytical procedure error (some of the filters were digested for metals analysis
before being weighed). The primary use of the particulate results was to satisfy permit conditions.
Enough data were gathered to show compliance with this permit.
Waste Water. Heat Exchanger Residue. Reactor Grit, and Scrubber Sludge Results
Table 6-4 presents the accuracy, precision, and completeness achieved for waste water (SS1), heat
exchanger residue (SS18), reactor grit (SS11), and scrubber sludge (SS12). The matrices at locations
SS1 and SS18 were very similar, therefore results were applied to both matrices. The QA objectives were
achieved in all cases except as noted below.
Trace Metals—
The precision and accuracy of metals results were not determined for any of these matrices. For the
reactor grit and scrubber sludge samples, there was a limited amount of sample collected. Sample size
was so small that metal analysis was not performed on any of the sludge samples and only one grit sample
was analyzed for metals. Due to the limited sample size, analysis for PCBs and the other critical analytes
was given priority. This was probably responsible for several metals mass balance closures that were
outside program objective limits. Metals precision for the waste water was determined from a field
duplicate sample. Due to the low levels of metals (at or near the detection limit) present in the waste
water, the precision data are not considered valid and could not be calculated for a number of metals!
Metals accuracy was not determined for the waste water (SS1), but a MS was performed on the scrubber
liquor (SS22). These results were applied to the waste water (SS1) and scrubber decant water (SS13)
due to the similarity of these matrices.
Chlorophenols—
The objective for precision of chlorophenols in waste water (SS1) and heat exchanger residue (SS18)
was not achieved. Chlorophenols showed low and variable recoveries for the MSs and MSDs thai: were
conducted for these samples. In particular, pentachlorophenol was subject to low recoveries. Low
recoveries for these acid organic compounds were observed in a number of samples. This is believed to
be due to the high levels of other aromatic organics and/or harsh conditions during the extraction stage of
analysis. Although this increases the uncertainty of this measurement, chlorophenols were not a critical
6-8
-------
TABLE 6-4. SUMMARY OF PRECISION, ACCURACY, AND COMPLETENESS ACHIEVED FOR
WASTE WATER, HEAT EXCHANGER RESIDUE, REACTOR GRIT, AND SCRUBBER SLUDGE
Compound
VOC
PCE
CP
CB
C6CI6
PAH's
PCDD/PCDF
PCB's
Total sulfur (as S)
SS1 and SS1 8 -waste water
Precision
Result
(*)
10.59
8
114'
3.6
0
4.63
13.12
—
Basis for
calculation
MS/MSD
MS/MSD
MS/MSD
MS/MSD
MS/MSD
MS/MSD
Field Dup
—
Frequency
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
_
Accuracy
Result
(%)
103
100
262
78.3
84
89
89.68
95.56
80-120
Basis for
calculation
MS/MSD
MS/MSD
MS/MSD
MS/MSD
MS/MSD
MS/MSD
LCS
MS/MSD
Audit
Frequency
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Completeness
(%)
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
Appendix 4
location
Table 4-40
Table 4-40
Table 4-518
Table 4-518
Table 4-518
Table 4-38
Table 4-41
Table 4-33,36
-
Compound
voc
PCE
CP
CB
C6CI6
PAH's
PCDD/PCDF
PCB's
Total sulfur (as S)
SS11- reactor grit
Precision
Result
48.5
40
17
17.9
17
4.3
_
_
~
Basis for
calculation
MS/MSD
MS/MSD
MS/MSD
MS/MSD
MS/MSD
MS/MSD
—
— ,
—
Frequency
2
2
2
2
2
1
—
—
_ •
Accuracy
Result
124
50
70.66
64.3
78
93
95
81
108.5
Basis for
calculation
MS/MSD
MS/MSD
MS/MSD
MS/MSD
MS/MSD
MS/MSD
LCS
Surr
LCS
Frequency
2
2
2
2
2
1
3
3
3
Completeness
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
Appendix 4
location
Table 4-40
Table 4-40
Table 4-39
Table 4-38
Table 4-38
Table 4-38
Table 4-41
Table 4-37
Table 4-46
Compound
VOC
PCE
CP
CB
C6CI6
PAH's
PCDD/PCDF
PCB's
Total sulfur (as S)
SS12 - scrubber sludge
Precision
Result
(%)
84
50.7*
47.8
4.28
0.75
7.17
—
33
Basis for
calculation
MS/MSD
MS/MSD
MS/MSD
MS/MSD
MS/MSD
MS/MSD
_
MS/MSD
—
Frequency
2
2
2
2
2
1
_.
2
Accuracy
Result
662'
89
63.6
71
83.25
125.5
101.3
73.5
105
Basis for
calculation
MS/MSD
MS/MSD
MS/MSD
MS/MSD
MS/MSD
MS/MSD
LCS
MS/MSD
LCS
Frequency
2
2
2
2
2
1
3
2
1
Completeness
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
Appendix 4
location
Table 4-40
Table 4-40
Table 4-38
Table 4-38
Table 4-33
Table 4-38
Table 4-41
Table 4-35
Table 4-46
* Objective not achieved
— Not determined
MS Matrix spike
MSD Matrix spike duplicate
LCS Laboratory control spike
Audit Audit sample
Surr Surrogates
Field Dup Field duplicate
6-9
-------
anafyfe; therefore, this does not significantly impact conclusions related to the primary objectives of the
project. The results may indicate a tow bias for some of the chlorophenols and increased uncertainty of
these measurements.
Sulfur-
An audit sample was submitted for sulfur analysis. As discussed above, the EPA provided the audit
sample and informed EER of the range obtained. The audit sample results satisfied the QA objectives for
sulfur measurements.
Perchloroethylene and VOCs—
The precision achieved for PCE in the scrubber sludge (SS12) was barely outside the program
objectives. This result does not significantly impact the conclusions regarding PCE destruction since this
stream was always insignificant in the data analysis. The accuracy for VOCs at the same location was
significantly above the QA objective. This occurred due to the relatively high levels of benzene in the
samples. The high level of benzene caused instrument saturation; hence, dilution of the samples was
required to bring the benzene concentration within the range of the analytical instrument. This resulted in
dilution of other VOC compounds to such low levels that spiked compounds could not be measured with
confidence. This in turn, resulted in high recoveries for the other VOC compounds, some as high as
6,014 percent. Although this does impact the secondary project objective relative to residuals
characterization to determine disposal requirements, the results indicate a probable high bias in the
reported VOC concentrations, and hence could be considered conservative. Conclusions regarding the
primary project objective for destruction efficiency of PCE are considered valid because PCE accuracy
satisfied the QA objective. VOCs in reactor grit (SS11) samples were subject to similar problems due to
the high levels of benzene.
PAH-
Samples of reactor grit (SS11) and scrubber sludge (SS12) contained levels of naphthalene that were
much higher than expected. This required substantial dilution of the sample to quantify the naphthalene
levels in the range of the analytical instrument. This resulted in low recoveries of PAH compound MSs
because: (1) spiking levels were low compared Jo the level already in the samples; and (2) dilutions
caused levels of MS compounds to be below the quantitation level. For these reasons, accuracy and
precision were calculated using only the samples in which the MS recoveries could be quantified.
Although these results indicate that the PAH data from these locations may be biased tow, there is no
impact on achievement of the primary project objectives.
6-10
-------
PCBs-
Due to the high levels of PCBs present in the reactor grit (SS11) samples, PCB MS levels were
insignificant compared to the levels already present. Therefore, MS/MSD data are not considered valid for
this matrix. Surrogate recoveries were used instead to calculate accuracy. All surrogate recoveries
satisfied the QA/QC criteria in the test methods. PCB MS/MSDs were used to calculate PCB accuracy and
precision for the scrubber sludge (SS12) samples. The PCB MS/MSD results for Condition 3 resulted in
low recoveries and those for condition 2 resulted in elevated recoveries. Although this does not affect
the DRE PCB objective, it could affect the engineering objective for DE of PCB. Since (1) the MS/MSD
results for some of the PCB congeners satisfied the QA objective, (2) all surrogate recoveries are within
limits, and (3) levels of PCBs were detected in other output stream samples besides reactor grit, the
reliability of the PCB DE results is considered adequate for engineering purposes.
Waste Oil. Contaminated Soil, and Treated Soil Results
Tables 6-5 and 6-6 show the precision, accuracy/and completeness achieved for waste oil (SS2),
contaminated soil (SS3), and treated soil (SS10). Since samples from SS3 and SS10 were of similar
matrices, precision and accuracy for both streams were determined from the one set of results. Precision
objectives for the contaminated and treated soil generally were not met for two reasons: (1) variability of
soil composition from drum to drum; and (2) metals concentrations were near the detection limits. Prior to
testing, the soil was prepared by mixing drums of widely differing PCB content to minimize variations
during testing. Grab samples of the mixed drums were collected at approximately 30 to 60 minute intervals
during the tests as the soil was transferred from the drum to the feed conveyer. The individual grab
samples for a test run were mixed together and a composite sample for analysis was obtained by "cone
and quarter" methods. Despite these procedures, the soil was very heterogeneous in appearance and it
was not possible to eliminate all variability. Additional comments on specific analytes are provided below.
PCBs-
Although the precision objective for PCBs in the soil was not achieved, the levels that were detected
were sufficient to achieve the DRE objectives despite the increased uncertainty of the measurement,
VOCs-
The precision objective for VOCs in the soil also was not achieved; however, this does not impact
achievement of the primary objectives. Since the treated soil was treated as a hazardous residue due to
the PCB content, the added uncertainty of the VOC measurements has no impact on disposal of the
treated soil. The VOC precision objective for the waste oil was not achieved due to the high levels
6-11
-------
TABLE 6-5. SUMMARY OF PRECISION, ACCURACY, AND COMPLETENESS FOR WASTE
OIL
Substance
VOC
PCE
CP
CB
C6CI6
PAH's
PCDD/PCDF
PCB's
Total sulfur (as S
Metals
Ag
As
Ba
3e
Cd
Cr
Cu
Hg
Mn
Ni
j
Pb
Sb
Se
Sn
•|
Zn
SS2 - waste oil
Result
4622
80*
10.73
3.51
1.17
229
—
7.91
100.43*
7.82
_
1.74
18.18
11.76
2.41
—
—•
822
7.14
8.7
— '
—
4.44
Precision
Basis for
calculation
MS/MSD
MS/MSD
MS/MSD
MS/MSD
MS/MSD
MS/MSD
_
Field dup
Field dup
Field dup
, —
Field dup
Field dup
Field dup
Field dup
_
—
Field dup
Field dup
Field dup
.. —
—
Field dup
Frequency
1
1
1
1
1
1
_
1
1
1
—
***
1
"*™
1
1
1
_ •
—
1
1
1
—
***
_.
, ~*
1
Accuracy
Result
100
100
66.7
85.5.
85.5
85.5
109.16
100.83
112
_.
—
—
._
—
—
_.
~
—
• ~
._
_.
_.
—
—•
_
-~-
Basis for
calculation
MS/MSD
MS/MSD
MS/MSD
MS/MSD
MS/MSD
MS/MSD
LCS
Surr
LCS
—
_.
• -~
—
—
—
—
—
_
_
—
_
_ •
_
.™
_
— .
—
Frequency
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
1
«
_
—
„
—
_
„
„.
_
_ -
_
—
„
_.
~T'
—
~
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
Appendix 4
location
Table 4-40
Table 4-40
Table 4-38
Table 4-38
Table 4-38
Table 4-38
Table 4. 41
Table 4-34,37
Table 4-34,47
Table 4-34
Table 4-34
Table 4-34
Table 4-34
Table 4-34
Table 4-34
Table 4-34
Table 4-34
Table 4-34
Table 4-34
Table 4-34
Table 4-34
Table 4-34
Table 4-34
Table 4-554
Table 4-5)4
Table 4-34
Table 4-514
* Not achieved
Not determined
Field dup Field duplicate
MS . Matrix spike
MSD Matrix spike duplicate
Surr Surrogates
LCS Laboratory control spike
6-12
-------
TABLE 6-6. SUMMARY OF PRECISION, ACCURACY, AND COMPLETENESS FOR
CONTAMINATED AND TREATED SOIL
Substance
VOC
PCE
CP
CB
C6CI6
PAH'S
PCDD/PCDF
PCB's
Total sulfur (as S;
Metals
Ag
As
Ba
Be
Cd
Cr
Cu
Hg
Mn
Ni
3 •
Pb
Sb
Se
Sn
T|
Zn
SS3 and SS1 0 • contaminated and treated soil
Result
68*
—
4.5
12
6.6
41
_
59*
_
so*
— •
51*
9.5
22*
55*
94*
75*
31*
34*
109*
52*
45*
_
• ~
71*
8.7
Precision
Basis for
calculation
Field Dup
Field Dup
MS/MSD
MS/MSD
MS/MSD
MS/MSD
_
Field dup
_
Field dup
—
Field dup
Field dup
Field dup
Field dup
Field dup
Field dup
Field dup
Field dup
Field dup
Field dup
Field dup
_
—
Field dup
Field dup
Frequency
1
1
1
1
1
1
—
1
—
1
—
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
. — '•
—
1
«••
1
Accuracy
Result
83.8
_» •
45.7
68
75.5
135.8
92.52
73
105
—
—
_
—
_.
_.
_
_
._
_
—
_-.
—
...
• _ . -
...
—
Basis for
calculation
MS/MSD
MS/MSD
MS/MSD
MS/MSD
MS/MSD
MS/MSD
LCS
SUIT
LCS
—
_
—
—
_
—
—
~
_
— •
_
,~
—
—.
— ,
_ , •
—
Frequency
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
_
_
_
„
_
_
_.
_
_.
...
—
„
_.
...
_
_
_
_.
Completenes
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
Appendix 4
location
Table 4-35,40
Table 4-35,40
Table 4-38
Table 4-38
Table 4-38
Table 4-38.
Table 4-41
Table 4-35,37
Table 4-46
Table 4-35
Table 4-35
Table 4-35
Table 4-35
Table 4-35
Table 4-35
Table 4-35
Table 4-35
Table 4-35
Table 4-35
Table 4-35
Table 4-35
Table 4-35,
Table 4-35
Table 4-35
Table 4-35
Table 4-35
Table 4-35
* Not achieved
— Not determined
Field dup Field duplicate
MS Matrix spike
MSD Matrix spike duplicate
Surr Surrogates
LCS Laboratory control spike
6-13
-------
present, requiring a very high dilution ratio (1:1,000.000) to quantify the sample within the anaJyf/caJ
instrument's calibrated range. For both the waste oil (SS2) and contaminated soil (SS3) locations, the
VOC MSs were erratic and usually individual analytes did not fall within the QA/QC criteria. This was due to
the high native levels of benzene and toluene present in the samples, resulting in MS levels that were
insignificant compared to the native levels. This has no impact on achievement of the primary or
secondary objectives of the project.
Sulfur—
The sulfur precision did not meet program objectives. This may have contributed to the poor mass
balance closures for sulfur, but did not affect achievement of the primary project objectives.
Trace Metals—
The objective for precision of metals in contaminated soil (SS3), which was calculated based on
analysis of field duplicates, was not achieved due to concentrations in the soil which were near the
detection limit. This did not impact the primary project objectives but the uncertainty of these
measurements is reflected in the poor mass balances for some trace metals in Condition 2.
Scrubber Decant Water Results
Table 6-7 shows the achieved precision, accuracy, and completeness for scrubber decant water
(SS13). All objectives were achieved for all substances except metals and sulfur. Precision for several
metals did not achieve the QA objectives due to the tow concentration of metals in the samples (at or very
near the detection limit). The precision for sulfur also was slightly above the QA objective. Both of these
precision results are not significant to the primary project objectives but the uncertainty of metals and
sulfur mass balances is increased.
FLUE GAS SAMPLING QUALITY ASSURANCE
In general, all flue gas sampling QA criteria were satisfied for this test program. All dry gas meters met
the ±5 percent post-test calibration accuracy criterion. AH isokinetic sample trains were operated within 90-
110 percent of the isokinetic velocity ratio. All post-test leak rates were within specified limits except for
the metals train during Condition 1 Run 2. The data from this train were corrected for the amount of air in-
leakage that might have occurred according to EPA Method 5, estimated at 7.1 percent of the total sample
volume.
6-14
-------
TABLE 6-7. SUMMARY OF PRECISION, ACCURACY, AND COMPLETENESS FOR SCRUBBER
DECANT WATER
Compound
VOC
PCE
CP
CB
C6O6
PAH'S
PCDD/PCDF
PCB's
Total sulfur (as S)
Metals
Ag
As
Ba
Be
Cd
Cr
Cu
Hg
Mn
Ni
P
Pb
Sb
Se
Sn
Tl
Zn
SS13 • scrubber decant water
Precision
Result
8.94
7.11
16.64
13
12.4
20.9
—
23.2
17.5*
38.8*
_
_
_
_
—
17
15.6
17
87 ',
13
—
81*
~
—
40*
_
40*
Basis for
calculation
MS/MSD
MS/MSD
MS/MSD
MS/MSD
MS/MSD
MS/MSD
—
MS/MSD
Field Dup
Field dup
—
_
_
—
—
Field dup
Field dup
Field dup
Field dup
Field dup
—
Field dup
_
• • -. :
Field dup
. -
Field dup
Frequency
3
3
3
3
3
3
_
3
1
1
_
_
„
_
—
1
1
1
1
1
_
1
™
—
1
_
1
Accuracy
Result
149.2
115.3
612
67.6
67.33
101.16
96.13
40.16
109.66
97
93
101
94
105
98
98
94
-~
97
100
101
104
100
97
_.
80
98
Basis for
calculation
MS/MSD
MS/MSD
MS/MSD
MS/MSD
MS/MSD
MS/MSD
LCS
MS/MSD
LCS
MS
MS
MS
MS
MS
MS
MS
MS
— •
MS
MS
MS
MS
MS
MS
...
MS
MS
Frequency
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
4
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
_
1
1
1
1
1
1
_
1
1
Completeness
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
Appendix 4
location
Table 4-40
Table 4-40
Table 4-38
Table 4-38
Table 4-38
Table 4-38
Table 4-41
Table 4-36
Table 4-35,46
Table 4-5(5,42
Table 4-35,42
Table 4-SS.42
Table 4-35,42
Table 4-35,42
Table 4-35,42
Table 4-35,42
Table 4-35,42
Table 4-35,42
Table 4-35,42
Table 4-35,42
Table 4-35,42
Table 4-35,42
Table 4-35,42
Table 4-35,42
Table 4-35,42
Table 4-35,42
Fable 4-35,42
* Not achieved
~ Not determined
Field dup Field duplicate
MS Matrix spike
MSD Matrix spike duplicate
LCS Laboratory control spike
6-15
-------
Aff flue gas sample train glassware was subjected to a proof blank before testing began to ensure
glassware cleanliness. Only a few native analytes were detected at levels very close to the detection limit.
Field blanks were also produced for all of the sample trains. The metals field blank results, presented in
Table 6-8, indicated contamination levels similar to those detected in the flue gas for antimony, barium,
chromium, copper, lead, and zinc. Silver, phosphorus, and tin were detected in the field blank but not in
any of the field samples. This was attributed to the background levels of metals in the filters and the tow
levels actually present in the flue gas. Since trace metal emissions from the flue gas were very tow, this is
not considered a significant problem. It does indicate a possible high bias in the reported trace metals
emissions levels. All other field blanks did not result in significant levels of contamination.
The drift criteria for the NOX and S02 analyzers used for boiler flue gas measurements were
exceeded for Condition 1 Run 2 due to thermal drift.' Data were corrected for drift for this run, with no
significant change in the uncertainty of the measurements.
ANALYTICAL QUALITY ASSURANCE
A number of laboratory QA/QC samples were processed along with the field samples. The presence
of benzene in the laboratory method blanks for VOST samples indicated carryover of benzene from
sample to sample. This may have contributed to the high benzene levels observed in the boiler flue gas.
Solid and liquid outlet stream samples had high levels of naphthalene and benzene, making quantitation
of other analytes difficult. While problems with the VOC and the PAH analysis were encountered, the
QA/QC results for PCBs and for samples which had an impact on achieving the primary project objectives
generally support the conclusions that were developed.
ADDITIONAL QUALITY CONTROL CHECKS
In addition to the QC checks required by the sampling and analytical methods and those required to
calculate precision and accuracy, a number of additional QC checks were implemented during the field
test program. These additional QC checks and the results are summarized in Table 6-9.
AUDIT RESULTS
Internal technical systems audits (TSA) were conducted by the EER QA coordinator to ensure proper
procedures and representative measurement systems were used. A technical systems audit involves
observation and documentation of a procedure. A summary of the TSAs that were performed are shown
6-16
-------
TABLE 6-8. FIELD BLANK RESULTS FOR MULTIPLE METALS TRAINS
Front
Half
Antimony
Barium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Phosporus
Silver
Tin
Zinc
Field
Blank
ng
14.0
4.3
1.7
2.6
9.7
10.O
1.5
74.O
11.0
Condition 1
Run 1
ug I FB%
15.O| 93
6.7 64
2.2 77
4.1 63
24.0 40
ND 1OO
ND 150
ND 740
81.0 14
Condition 1
Run 2
ug FB%
ND 14O
2.7 159
1.8 94
1.5 173
7.9 123
ND 10O
ND 150
ND 740
26.0 42
Condition 1
Run3
ug !FB%
15.0; 93
5.7 I 75
2.6 ! 65
3.6 | 72
16.0} 61
14.0 1 71
ND I 150
ND | 740
30.0 ! 37
Condition 3
Run 1
ug I FB%
11.01 127
4.0 I 108
1.8 j 94
3.4 i 76
11.0! 88
13.0J 77
ND ! 150
ND | 740
52.0! 21
Condition 3
Run 2
ug i FB%
13.0! 1O8
3.9 ! 11O
4.9 j 35
5.0 | 52
12.OJ 81
17.0! 59
ND { 150
ND ! 740
25.0 1 44
Condition 3
Run3
ug I FB%
15.0 93
4.9 88
2.4 71
5.1 51
15.0 65
17.0 59
ND 150
ND 740
210 5
Condition 2
Run 1
ug
13.O
5.6
2.5
6.6
16
ND
ND
13
32
I FB%
1O8
77
68
39
61
1OO
15O
569
63
Condition 2
Run 2
U9 FB%
14.O 1OO
4.2 1O2
5.1 33
3.8 68
2O 49
ND 1OO
ND 150
ND 74O
20 -. 100
o>
Back
Half
Zinc
Field
Blank
ug
9.0
Condition 1
Run 1
_U9 I FB%
14.01 64
Condition 1
Run 2
U9 !FB%
8.2 I 110
Condition 1
Runs
_ug i FB%
4.5 I 200
Condition 3
Run 1
ug i FB%
4.8 j 188
Condition 3
Run 2
ug I FB%
12.O[ 75
Condition 3
RunS
ug
14.0
FB%
64
FB% = field result expressed as a percentage of the field blank level
Front half & back half recovered together for Condition 2.
Front half field blank percentage for zinc is calculated from the sum of the front half and back half hits
ND - Not detected
-------
TABLE 6-9. SUMMARY OF QUALITY CONTROL CHECKS
Parameter
QC check description
Results
8813 • scrubber decant flow rate
Comparison of decant tank level
(volumetric) and gravimetric
measurements.
Deviations between dipstick and
gravimetric < 3%
Boiler flue gas background
contamination
Field blank for all manual flue gas
sampling trains
All trains clean except the metals
train. Detectible concentrations of
metals were seen in the front half
portion. Contamination has been
isolated to the filter.
Manual sampling train glassware
proofs
AH glassware cleaned and proofed to
detect any contamination before
beginning the program
All glassware clean.
Boiler flue gas dilution effects
Oxygen was measured at alternating
points between the outlet of the boiler
(reference) and at each sampling port
ocation.
Approximately 18% greater 02
concentration at the organics and
he HCI ports. All other ports
matched the reference port.
Boiler flue gas cyclonic flow
Boiler flue gas stratification
Cyclonic flow check
Average 5 degrees, within QAPP
guidelines
Traverse stratification using NOxand 02
Greatest point was 3.18% for 02
and 1.8% for NOx. Within general
guidelines.
Continuous emission monitoring
system response times
Waste water background
contamination
Time required for 95% of the gas
concentration introduced at the probe to
•each the analyzers.
Field blank using Dl water. The bottle of
water was treated just like 881-waste
water
:or all analyzers < 1 minute except
or the 802 which took
approximately 40 minutes
—————__.__
Most trace compounds ND, some
iits but very close to the detection
mit.
Clean soil background
:ontamination
:ield blank using laboratory sand. The
bottle of sand was treated just like 8810 -
reatedsoil
iome hits of HCB and di-penta
'CB's. All other trace elements ND.
6-18
-------
in Tabte 6-10. As shown in the table, systems audits were conducted for the flue gas sampling trains and
for the process sampling procedures. It should be noted that if any problems were recognized during the
systems audit, corrective action was implemented immediately at that time. Most technical systems audits
were performed before testing began to avoid any problems during testing. A follow up systems audit was
performed if necessary to ensure any difficulties observed in the pre-test audit was corrected.
During the Demonstration tests, an external ISA of the field sampling activities was conducted by
EPA. All sampling procedures were audited. The external field TSA concluded that sampling activities
were performed adequately to ensure representative and quality sample collection and measurement.
The external field audit report is included in an Appendix 5,
\
An external laboratory TSA was performed by EPA during the analytical phase. The TSA did not
uncover any problems that would significantly impact the primary project objectives. Other issues were
corrected to the extent possible. The external laboratory audit report is included in an Appendix 5.
A performance audit involves the performance of a measurement device compared to a reference. A
number of performance evaluation audits (PEAs) were conducted during the test program. Table 6-11
lists the equipment, a description of the performance evaluation audit, and the result of the PEAs that
were conducted during the course of the test program.
DEVIATIONS TO THE QAPP
Deviations to the QAPP dated December 18,1992, include the following:
• Puffing in the boiler stack caused filters on the multiple metals train to rip. The problem was solved
by securing the filter down on the frit with two pieces of Teflon tape in a cross pattern. Thetape
holds the filter down onto the frit but did not affect sample integrity. The tape was then recovered
like a piece of glassware. This method was approved by EPA.
• The impinger setup for the HCI train was modified to prevent NaOH from back-washing into the
H2S04 impingers. The modifications are given in Table 6-12.
• In order to reduce the amount of HCB required to spike into the TDU to show four nines
destruction efficiency, the treated soil HCB analysis was conducted using electron capture
detection.
6-19
-------
TABLE 6-10. SUMMARY OF TECHNICAL SYSTEM AUDITS
Date
Test Phase
Measurement system
30-Sep-92
30-Sep-92
30-Sep-92
30-Sep-92
1-Oct-92
1-Oct-92
1-Oct-92
1-Oct-92
3-Oct-92
3-Oct-92
3-Oct-92
3-Oct-92
3-Oct-92
3-Oct-92
3-Oct-92
5-Oct-92
5-Oct-92
5-Oct-92
Before testing
Pretest • HCI sampling train operation and recovery
SS12 sampling, flow rate recording, and compositing procedures
SS13 sampling, flow rate recording, and compositing procedures
SS22 sampling, flow rate recording, and compositing procedures
Pretest - trace metals sampling train procedure and recovery
Pretest - SVOC sampling train procedure and recovery
Pretest • process gas sampling system operation
Pretest - volatile organics sampling train operation and recovery
All equipment calibration documentation
SS1 sampling, flow rate recording, and compositing procedures
SS2 sampling, flow rate recording, and compositing procedure
SS4 sampling, flow rate recording, and compositing procedures
SS5 sampling, flow rate recording, and compositing procedures
SS11 sampling, flow rate recording, and compositing procedures
SSI8 sampling, flow rate recording, and compositing procedures
Trace metals sampling train operation
Trace metals sampling train recovery
SS1 sampling, ftow rate recording, and compositing procedures
12-Oct-92
16-Oct-92
16-Oct-92
17-Oct-92
17-Oct-92
19-Oct-92
19-Oct-92
19-Oct-92
19-Oct-92
23-Oct-92
24-Oct-92
24-Oct-92
During testing
• — u'..
Process gas sampling system operation
SVOC sampling train operation
SVOC sampling train recovery
CEM system performance
SS14 sample train operation and recovery
VOC sample train procedure
VOC sample train recovery
HCI sample train procedure
HCI sample train recovery
Sample storage, custody, and shipping
SVOC sample train procedure
>VOC sample train recovery
6-20
-------
TABLE 6-11. SUMMARY OF PERFORMANCE EVALUATION AUDITS
Equipment
Dry gas meters
Analytical balances
Stack pilot tube
Stack TC
CEM
Description
Critical orifice check for al
dry gas meters
Comparison against NBS
traceable weight
Verification of pitot tube
dimensions
Comparison against
mercury-in-glass
thermometer
Challenge all analyzers
with EPA Protocol gases
Results
All but one dry gas meter passed within 5%.
Although the post-test cal on the dry gas
meter that failed did come wihin spec.
Digital balance was within 0.02% and the
triple beam balance was within 0.05%
Met all method criteria
Identical temperatures were measured
All analyzers were within 1% of the true
value
6-21
-------
TABLE 6-12. MODIFICATIONS TO EPA METHOD 26 - HCI TRAIN
Impinger
Impinger 1
Impinger 2
Impinger 3
Impinger 4
ImpinperS
Impinger 6
Planned
Empty
0.1NH2S04
0.1NH2S04
0.1NNaOH
0.1NHaOH
Silica gel
Modified
Empty
0.1NH2S04
0.1NH2S04
Empty
O.SNNaOH
Silica gel
6-22
-------
• An engineering objective to the program was to show DE of PCBs to at least four nine's (99.99
percent) efficiency. For Condition 3, detection limits for the scrubber decant water (SS13) and
scrubber liquor (SS22) were limiting the destruction efficiency result. These samples were re-
analyzed using a modified procedure to obtain lower detection limits by eliminating matrix
interferences. The modified extraction and cleanup procedure included methylene chloride
extraction, silica gel cleanup followed by gel permeation column cleanup. The extract was then
solvent exchanged to hexane followed by a florisil column cleanup. This procedure did provide
substantially lower detection limits and allowed the PCS DE objective to be achieved.
QA ORGANIZATION
The QA/QC organization is shown in Figure 6-1. The test program was organized to provide both
internal and external QA functions, which were independent of the program performance. The EER QA
Coordinator was Mr. William Oberg. Mr. Oberg's responsibilities included internal QA audit activities, daily
QA checks, daily documentation, daily reporting, and coordination of all project QA. The external QA team
was overseen by the U.S. EPA Quality Assurance Coordinator, Ms. Ann Kem.
6-23
-------
EER
Jerald Cote
QA Manager
U.S EPA
Ann Kern
External QA Coordinator
FWEI
Paul Freidman
QA Manager
EER
William Oberg
QA Coordinator
U.S. EPA
Gordon Evans
Project Officer
FWEI
Gerald Sudell
Test Coordinator
EER
Greg Rooney
Field Manager
Lines of Authority
Lines of Coordination
Figure 6-1. QA Organization
6-24
-------
SITE PROGRAM DEMONSTRATION
ECO LOGIC INTERNATIONAL
GAS-PHASE CHEMICAL REDUCTION PROCESS
BAY CITY, MICHIGAN
TECHNOLOGY EVALUATION REPORT
Appendices
prepared for
Foster Wheeler Enviresponse, Inc.
Edison, New Jersey 08837
by
Energy and Environmental Research Corporation
Irvine, California 92718
Under Foster Wheeler Enviresponse Inc. Purchase Order Numbers
VN1-330-480000 and VN5-740-480000
EPA Contract No. 68-C9-0033
Project Officer
Gordon M. Evans
RISK REDUCTION ENGINEERING LABORATORY
U. S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
CINCINNATI, OHIO 45268
July 15, 1994
-------
NOTICE
The information in this document has been funded wholly or in part by the United States
Environmental Protection Agency under EPA Contract No. 68-C9-0033 to Foster Wheeler Enviresponse,
Inc. It has-been subjected to the Agency's peer and administrative review, and it has been approved for
publication as an EPA document. Mention of trade names or commercial products does not constitute
endorsement or recommendation for use.
-------
FOREWORD
The Superfund Innovative Technology Evaluation (SITE) Program was authorized in the 1986
Superfund amendments. The program is a joint effort between EPA's Office of Research and
Development and Office Solid Waste and Emergency Response. The purpose of the program is to
assist the development of hazardous waste treatment technologies necessary to implement new cleanup
standards which require greater reliance on permanent remedies. This is accomplished through
technology demonstrations that are designed to provide engineering and cost data on selected
technologies.
The SITE Program funded a field demonstration to evaluate the Eco Logic Gas-Phase Chemical
Reduction Process developed by ELI Eco Logic International Inc. (ELI), Ontario, Canada. The
Demonstration took place at the Middleground Landfill in Bay City, Michigan using landfill waste. The
Demonstration effort assessed the technology's ability to treat hazardous wastes, based on performance
and cost. Three reports contain the results of the Demonstration: this Technology Evaluation Report,
which describes the field activities and presents the results including a performance evaluation; an
Applications Analysis Report, which interprets the data and discusses the applicability of the technology
to liquid feedstocks; and an Independent Applications Analysis Report, which interprets the date and
discusses the applicability of the thermal desorption unit (TDU) to soil feedstocks. Two independent
demonstration bulletins, previously published by EPA, presented preliminary information on the reactor
and TDU tests, respectively.
Additional copies of this report may be obtained at no charge from EPA's Center for Environmental
Research Information, 26 West Martin Luther King Drive, Cincinnati, Ohio, 45268. Requests should
include the EPA document number found on the report's front cover. When this supply is exhausted,
additional copies can be purchased from the National Technical Information Service, Ravensworth Bldg.,
Springfield, VA, 22161, (702) 487-4600. Reference copies will be available at EPA libraries in their
Hazardous Waste Collection. To inquire about the availability of other reports, call the SITE
Clearinghouse Hotline at 1-80CM24-9396 or (202) 382-3000 in Washington, DC.
E. Timothy Oppelt, Director
Risk Reduction Engineering Laboratory
-------
ABSTRACT
pe SITE Program demonstration of the ELI Eco Logic Gas-Phase Chemical Reduction Process was
conducted to obtain reliable performance and cost data required to evaluate the applicability of the
technology for remediating hazardous waste sites. The Demonstration took place at the Middleground
Landfill in Bay City, Michigan.
The ELI process reacts complex high-molecular-weight organic contaminants, such as polychlorinated
biphenyls (PCBs), with hydrogen-rich gas at high temperatures to produce simpler compounds such as
methane, hydrogen chloride and water vapor. The SITE Demonstration of the ELI Process consisted of
three test conditions. The process treated PCB-contaminated water, soil, and oil during test conditions 1
2, and 3, respectively. A comprehensive sampling and analysis program was conducted during the
Demonstration to characterize process air emissions, residuals and effluents; it also determined
destruction efficiency and destruction and removal efficiency of the system.
This report presents the results of the Demonstration. It includes a process description &
performance evaluation, a summary of the sampling and analytical program and a quality assurance/quality
control evaluation of the data.
IV
-------
TABLE OF CONTENTS • APPENDICES
Sesiion . Eags
Foreword [[[ y;
Abstract [[[ 1'""!""!!!"""™'.!" iv
Figures [[[ [[[ '.'""'."'". vii
Tables .................. ............................................ .... .................... !"""!I"!!!"!!"!."!!.'".3I"viii
Abbreviations and Symbols [[[ xi
SI Conversion Factors ........................ [[[ . ....... .ZZZ3ZITI xvi
Acknowledgments .......................... . .................................... . ........................................... .
1. Process Operation [[[ '.....AM
2. Summary of Results ........................ , [[[ A2-1
3. Data Evaluation [[[ ...A3-1
Detection Limits ........ . .......................... . ............................................. .... ................................. A3-1
Interpolating composite concentrations to run concentrations ........................................... ..... A3-1
Results presentation [[[ . ................................................ Aj.2
4. Internal Quality Assurance [[[ ... A4-1
QA samples [[[ A4-i
Summary of QA/QC results ................ ... [[[ ... A4-3
Detailed QA/QC results ...................................... [[[ A44
Boiler flue gas [[[ ...A44
Semivolatile organic compounds [[[ , ...... .... A4-4
Volatile organic compounds ................................... : ................ . ............................. A4-5
Metals .................................... . [[[ . ..... ...A4-5
Hydrogen chloride ..................... . .......................................... .................. . .......... ... A4-6
Continuous emission monitoring [[[ A4-7
Process gas streams ............... [[[ . .......... A4-7
Semivolatile organic compounds.. ..................................... . ................................... A4-8
-------
TABLE OF CONTENTS - APPENDICES
(CONTINUED)
Section
Page
4. Internal Quality Assurance (confd)
Equipment calibrations • process weight scales ,.... A4-166
Equipment calibrations • process gas sampling , A4-169
Equipment calibrations - miscellaneous : A4-182
CEM calibration gas certification •, A4-184 *
5, External Quality Assurance Audit Reports I A5-1 *
These sections have been deleted from this report. Copies are available from Gordon Evans.
VI
-------
labia FIGURES
Partitioning of PCBs...
g^rfPCEandSST .......... ' .................. ' ..................... ............
Partitioning of dioxins... ......... ' ................................ . ..... . ....... ............................
Partitioning of furans..... ...................... ' .................... «« .................. .......................... " ......
A3-28
A4-134
A4-135
...
"" ............................. -M ...... A4-137
""""""" ............. ....... .... A4-1
vii
-------
TABLES
Ishla
A1-1 Condition 1 Run 1 process operation summary
A1«2 Condition 1 Run 2 process operation summary
A1-3 Condition 1 Run 3 process operation summary
A1-4 Condition 2 Run 1 process operation summary
A1-5 Condition 2 Run 2 process operation summary :
A1-6 Condition 3 Run 1 process operation summary
A1-7 Condition 3 Run 2 process operation summary
A1-8 Condition 3 Run 3 process operation summary ,
A1-9 Summary of process flow rates
A2-1 SS1 • waste water summary .........
A2-2 SS2 • waste oil summary
A2-3 SS3 - contaminated soil summary „,.,... ......
A2-4 SS4 • scrubber caustic summary
A2-5 SS5 • scrubber make-up water summary
A2-6 SS6 - propane summary
A2-7 SS7 • hydrogen summary
A2-8 SS9 • combustion air summary ,
A2-9 SS10 • treated soil summary
A2-10 SS1 1 • reactor grit summary
A2-11 SSI 2 • scrubber sludge summary .......
A2-12 SS13 • scrubber decant water
A2-13 SS14 • reformed gas summary
A2-14 SSI 5 • reformed gas storage tank condensate
A2-15 SS16 • boiler flue gas summary
A2-16 SS18 • heat exchanger residue summary
A2-17 SS19 - TDU off-gas summary
A2-18 SS20 - molten bath summary
A2-19 SS22 • scrubber liquor summary
A2-20 SS24 • TDU quench water summary
A3-1 Condition 1 - polychlorinated biphenyls
A3-2 Condition 2 - polychlorinated biphenyls.....
A3-3 Condition 3 • polychlorinated biphenyls.....
A34 Condition 1 -perchloroethylene ...
A3-5 Condition 2 - hexachlorobenzene
A3-6 Condition 3 - perchloroethylene
A3-7 Condition 1 • dioxins
A3-8 Condition 2 • dioxins
A3-9 Condition 3 - dioxins ............
A3-10 Condition 1 « furans
A3-11 Condition 2 - furans
A3-12 Condition 3 • furans
A4-1 Quality assurance samples ,
A1-2
. A1-3
'...; A14
A1-5
A1-6
A1-7
A1-8
.'..• ,,.A1-9
.....i A1-10
; A2-2
.......... A2-8
.......... A2-11
A2-15
.....A2-16
; A2-17
A2-19
A2-21
A2-25
A2-29
A2-33
A2-37
: A241
A2-60
A2-53
.A2-62
..A2-65
..AM7
A2-68
,.. A2-66
.....i ...AM
.....i A3-6
...A3-7
A&8
A3-9
A3-10
A3-11
; ....A3-12
A3-13
.....i ....A3-14
A3-15
A3-16
, A4-13
VIII
-------
TABLES (CONTINUED)
Table
A4-2 Sampling and analytical problems identified by the internal QA/QC activities A4-18
A4-2b Key to annotated tables
A4-3 SS16 SVOC QA blank results !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
A4-4 SS16 SVOC method blank results "Z."."
A4-5 SS16 SVOC surrogate recoveries !!!!!!!!!!!!!! M-S?
A4-6 SS16 SVOC internal standard recoveries "Z ' /M.™
A4-7 SS16 SVOC alternate standard recoveries '
A4-8 SS16 SVOC LCS/LCSD results ""."['
A4-9 SS16 SVOC duplicate summary
A4-10 VOST field blanks 44™
A4-.11 VOST trip blanks I!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!"! A«1
A4-12 VOST surrogate recoveries ZZZZ A4-52
A4-13 VOST laboratory control spike results /uro
A4-14 SS16 VOC audit results Z!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! ' M&
A4-15 SS16 metals field blank and proof results IZZZZ"!.'""."""! " A4-57
A4-16 Metals field blank results as a percentage of the individual runs !! " MJ&
A4-17 SS16 metals duplicate
A4-18 SS16 HCI QA results "Zl!!"!!!!!ZZ.~
A4-19 Stratification check •!!!!!l!!ZZ™.'."".'.".'
A4-20 Response times (to 95% of span) Z!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! 'M^\
A4-21 Oxygen dilution check of all stack ports I!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! A4-62
A4-22 Cyclonic flow check Z!!!!!.!!!!!!!!!. A4-63
A4-23 Internal standard recovery summary for PCB measurements in process gas samples'.'.".'.".' A4-64
A4-24 Internal standard recovery summary for PCDD/PCDF measurements in process
gas samples
A4-25 Internal standard recovery summary for chlorobenzene and chlorophenol
measurements in process gas samples
A4-26 Alternate standard recovery summary for PCDD and PCDF measurements''^
process gas samples
A4-27 Alternate standard recovery summary for polychlorobiphenyl measurements in
process gas samples ;
A4-28 Surrogate spike recovery summary for PCDD and PCDF measurements in
process gas samples _
A4-29 VOC surrogate recoveries in process gas samples A4-70
A4-30 Fixed gases audit sample ZZ!!! A4-71
A4-31 SS1-waste water field blank results .!!! M-72
A4-32 SS10 - treated soil field blank I!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!"!!!!' A4-75
A4-33 SS1 field sample duplicate summary Z!!!ZZZZ A4-78
A4-34 SS2 field sample duplicate summary.... !.!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! A4-82
A4-35 SS3, SS22 field sample duplicate summary ZZZZ A4-87
A4-36 PCB matrix spike and matrix spike duplicate summary .....ZZ!.!! A4-94
A4-37 PCB surrogate recovery summary """"
ix
-------
TABLES (CONTINUED)
Table.
A4-38
A4-39
A4-40
A4-41
A4-42
A4-43
A4-45
A4-46
A447
CB, CP, and PAH matrix spike and matrix spike duplicate summary .................. . ............ A4-103
CB, CP, and PAH surrogate recovery summary [[[ A4-107
VOC matrix spike and matrix spike duplicate summary ....................... . ............. , ........... A4-109
PCDD/PCDF laboratory control spike results ....................................... , ......................... A4-114
SS22 • scrubber liquor metals matrix spike results ............................................. :... ........ A4-128
Organic halogen QA results .......................... . .................................................. . ........... A4-129
Ultimate analysis QA/QC activities [[[ . ........... A4-13Q
Total organic carbon QA results [[[ . ........... A4-131
-------
ABBREVIATIONS AND SYMBOLS
Hg microgram
% percent . . .
< less than; average analytical results includes both detected and non-detected data
> greater than; average analytical results includes data above linear range of analyzer
AAR Applications Analysis Report •
ACCUM accumulative stream
aef actual cubic feet
acm actual cubic meters
Ag silver
ALR above linear range
As arsenic
ASTM American Society for Testing and Materials
B. lab method blank contamination
B.H. back half (components of sampling train downstream of filter)
Ba barium
Be beryllium
BOR beginning of run
BQL below quantftation limit
Btu British thermal unit
C carbon
C2CI4 perehloroethylene; also tetrachloroethylene or tetrachloroethene
ethylene
hexachlorobenzene
benzene
Ca(OH)2 calcium hydroxide (lime) •
CAA Clean Air Act
GARB California Air Resources Board
OB chtorobenzenes
ffi cubic centimeter
CCI4 carbon tetrachloride
Cd cadmium
CEL Calscience Environmental Laboratory Inc.
GEM continuous emissions monitoring
CERCLA Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act
" cubic foot , .
cfrn cubic feet per minute
CFR Code of Federal Regulations
CH4 methane
CIMS chemicalfonization mass spectrometer
Cl chlorine
cm centimeter
cm* square centimeter
XI
-------
ABBREVIATIONS AND SYMBOLS (CONTINUED)
CO carbon monoxide .
C02 carbon dioxide
CP chlorophenols
Cr chromium ;
Cr(VI) hexavatent chromium :
Cu copper
CV-AAS cold vapor atomic absorption spectres-copy
CWA Clean Water Act
DE destruction efficiency
Dl deionized
DNAPL dense nonaqueous-phase liquid
DOT Department of Transportation
dP differential pressure (e.g., velocity head)
DRE destruction and removal efficiency
dscf dry standard cubic feet at 20°C(68°F) and 760 mm Hg (29.92 in. Hg)
dscm dry standard cubic meters at 20°C (68°F) and 760 mm Hg (29.92 in. Hg)
Dup duplicate
E estimated maximum possible concentration • ;
EER Energy and Environmental Research Corporation
ELI ELI Eco Logic International, Incorporated
EMPC estimated maximum possible concentration
EOR end of run
EPA U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
excl. excluding
F fluorine; or as flag meaning laboratory blank was 20 percent of measured value or greater
(result not statistically significant)
F.H. front half (filter and upstream components of sampling train)
FB field blank
FID flame fonization detector
FPD flame photometric detector
FS field spike
ft feet
ft* square foot
ft3 cubic foot
FWEI Foster Wheeler Enviresponse Incorporated
g gram
gal gallon
GO gas chromatography
GF-AAS graphite furnace atomic absorption spectroscopy
gpm gallons per minute . :
gr grains :
H hydrogen (atomic)
H£ hydrogen (molecular)
H2S04 sulfuricacid
HCB hexachlorobenzene
HCI hydrogen chloride :
Hg mercury
HpCDD heptachlorodibenzodioxin :
XII
-------
ABBREVIATIONS AND SYMBOLS (CONTINUED)
HpCDF heptachlorodibenzofuran
hr hour
HRGC high resolution gas chromatography
HRMS high resolution mass spectrometry
HSL hazardous substances list
HW hazardous waste
HxCDD hexachlorodibenzodioxin
MxCDF hexachlorodibenzofuran
1C ion chromatography
(CAP inductively coupled argon plasma spectroscopy
IN input stream
in. WC inches of water column (pressure)in.inch
in2 square inch
incl. induding
INT interferences prevented quantification of substance
kg kilogram
KMn04 potassium permanganate
KW kilowatt
L liter
Ib pound
Ibm pound mass
LC laboratory control
LCS laboratory control spike
LCSD laboratory control spike duplicate
m meter
m2 square meter
m3 cubic meter
MBC mass balance closure
MDNR Michigan Department of Natural Resources
mg milligram
MGD million gallons per day
min minute
Mn manganese
M S matrix spike (in context of QA)
MS mass spectrometry (in context of analytical methods)
MS monitoring station (in context of process monitoring)
MSD matrix spike duplicate
MW molecular weight
n neglected
N normality of solution
N A not available or not analyzed
NAAQS National Ambient Air Quality Standards
NaOH sodium hydroxide (caustic soda)
NC could not be calculated
ND notdetected
NDIR non-dispersive infrared
NDUV non-dispersive ultraviolet
ng nanogram
XIII
-------
ABBREVIATIONS AND SYMBOLS (CONTINUED)
Ni nickel
m not needed for computations
NOX oxides of nitrogen (NO + N02)
NPDES National Pollution Discharge Elimination System NPLNatfonal Priorities List
NS not spiked
0 oxygen (atomic)
O&M operating and maintenance
QS oxygen (molecular)
OCDD octachlorodibenzodioxin !
OCDF octachlorodibenzofuran
ORD EPA Office of Research and Development
OSHA Occupational Safety and Health Act
OSWER EPA Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response
OUT output stream
P phosphorus '•
PAH polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon i
Pb lead ; .
PCB polychlorinated biphenyl •
PCDD polychlorinated dibenzo[p]dioxins
PCDF polychlorinated dibenzofurans
PCE perchloroethylene;alsotetrachloroethyleneortetrach!oroethene
PEA performance evaluation audit
PeCDD pentachlorodibenzodioxin
PeCDF pentachlorodibenzofuran
p H negative log of hydrogen ion concentration in solution - a measure of acidity/alkalinity
PIO product of incomplete combustion
PIR product of incomplete reduction . :
POHC principal organic hazardous constituent
POTW publicity owned treatment works
ppb parts per billion
PPE personnel protection equipment
ppm parts per million
ppmv parts per million by volume ;
ppmw parts per million by weight
PSD prevention of significant deterioration ';
psi pounds per square inch
psig pounds per square inch, gage
QA quality assurance
QAPP quality assurance project plan QAPjP quality assurance project plan
QO quality control :
QS quantified with secondary ion
R&D research and development ;
RCRA resource conservation and recovery act
RF radio frequency
RPD relative percent difference
RREL Risk Reduction Engineering Laboratory
RSD relative standard deviation :
S sulfur
XIV
-------
ABBREVIATIONS AND SYMBOLS (CONTINUED)
SARA Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization Act
SAT data estimated based on saturated instrument response
Sb antimony
scf standard cubic foot at 20°C (68°F) and 760 mm Hg (29.92 in. Hg)
sefm standard cubic feet per minute at 20PC (68°F) and 760 mm Hg (29.92 in. Hg)
scm standard cubic meter at 20°C(68°F) and 760 mm Hg (29.92 in, Hg)
Se selenium
sec second
SI International System of Units (LeSysteme International d Unites)
SITE Superfund Innovative Technology Evaluation Program
sL standard liter .
Sn tin
S02 sulfur dioxide
SPCC system performance check compound
SS sampling station
SSHO site safety and health officer
stdev standard deviation
Surr surrogate
SVOC semivolatile organic compound
TCDD tetrachlorodibenzodioxin
TCDF tetrachlorodibenzofuran
TCLP Toxicity Characteristic Leachate Procedure
TCT Twin City Testing Inc.
TDU thermal desorption unit
TER Technology Evaluation Report
THC total hydrocarbons
TS thaium
TLI Triangle Laboratiories, Inc.
TSA technical systems audit
TSCA Toxic Substances Control Act
TSD treatment, storage, and disposal
TSR technical system review
U.S. United States
VOC volatile organic compounds
vol.% percent, volume basis
VOST volatile organic sampling train
wt.% percent, weight basis
x analyzed
yd yard
Zn zinc
°C degrees centigrade
°F degrees Fahrenheit
xv
-------
SI CONVERSION FACTORS
Multiply Enq|ish (USlunits by Factor to get Metric (SI) Unit?
Area:
Flow Rate:
Length:
Mass:
Volume:
Temperature:
Concentration:
Pressure:
Heating value:
1W
1in2
1 gal/min
1 gal/min
1MGD
1ft
1in
lib
1lb
1ft3
1ft3
1gal
1gal
Ufc — J fmamm^amta v
0.0929
6.452
6.31 X 10-5
0.0631
43.81
0.3048
2.54
453.59
• 0.45359
28.316
0.028317
3.785
0.003785
m2
cm2
m3/s
L/s
L/s
m
cm
g
kg
L
m3
L
m^
op. 32
0.55556
•C
1gr/ft3
1 gr/gal
1lb/in2
1lb/in2
Btu/lb
Btu/sef
2.2884
0.0171
16.03
0.07031
6894.8
2326
37260
0/L
P/Lo
kfl/crri2
Newton/m2
Joules/kg
JoulesYscm
XVI
-------
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
Energy and Environmental Research Corporation (EER) performed the sampling and analysis
activities and prepared this report for the U.S. EPA under subcontract to Foster Wheeler Enviresponse,
Inc. (FWEI). The project was managed by FWEI under EPA Contract 68-C9-0033. The principal authors of
the report were Greg Rooney, David Hansel!, William Oberg, and Glenn England. The authors gratefully
acknowledge the assistance and contributions of Gordon M. Evans, the EPA Program Manager, and
Gerard W. Sudell, the FWEI Work Assignment Manager, throughout the entire project. The authors also
would like to acknowledge the assistance of; ELI Eco Logic International Inc., especially Kelvin Campbell
and Craig McEwen; Mr. Edward Golson, City of Bay City; Joel Pitman of Huntingdon Twin City Testing Inc.
and Dr. Hani Karam of Triangle Laboratories Inc., who were responsible for sample analysis; and each of
the EER test team members who participated in the demonstration.
XVII
-------
This page intentionally left blank
XVIII
-------
APPENDIX 1
PROCESS OPERATION
The average process operating conditions for each test run are presented in this appendix. Tables
AM through A1-8 present the average, maximum, and minimum values for key process parameters
monitored during the Demonstration. The test values are compared to the target values and operational
limits established in the Quality Assurance Project Plan. Table A1-9 summarizes the test periods and
mass flow rate of each process stream for each test run. The data in Table A1-9 were used in all mass
balance calculations. Flow rates for streams that are a net output from the process are distinguished from
inputs by a minus sign. Note that some process streams such as heat exchanger residue and scrubber
liquor are treated as batch rather than continuous streams. The flow rates ofthese streams are based on
net mass gain or toss during the test divided by the test period. These streams are identified as "ACCUM"
in Table A1-9.
During Condition 3, boiler tests were performed after waste oil processing was completed. Reformed
gas was compressed and stored in a tank during waste processing. The time period for waste processing
ranged from 55 minutes to 169 minutes. After waste processing was completed, reformed gas was fed
Jram the tank to the boiler at a tower flow rate until the tank was empty. The time to empty the tank ranged
from 431 minutes to 1417 minutes. The flow rate of reformed gas is calculated two ways: (1) rate of
reformed gas proton was determined by dividing the total quantity of reformed gas produced during
waste processing by the waste processing period; and (2) the rate at which the reformed gas was fed to
the boiler was determined by dividing the total quantity of reformed gas produced during waste
processing by the total time required to empty the tank.
AM
-------
TABLE A1-1. CONDITION 1 RUN 1 PROCESS OPERATION SUMMARY
to
Parameter
Waste water feed rate
Waste oil feed rate
PCE (spike) injection rate
Vaporizer pressure
Vaporizer temperature
Reactor temperature
Recirculation heater exit temperature
Reactor pressure
Gas booster differential pressure
Recirculation flowrate **
Scrubber inlet temperature
Scrubber exit temperature
Scrubber liquor pH
System oxygen
Oxvaen - boiler stack
Residence time**
Reformed gas pressure
Recirculation vacuum
1 -Chlorobenzene*
2-Chiorobenzene*
3-Chtorobenzene*
Monitoring
Station
—
—
—
12
12
2
9
1
7
—
3
6
5
10
11
—
10
7
10
10
10
Units
kg/min
kg/min
g/min
psi
°C
oC
°C
in. WC
in. WC
cfm
°C
°C
—
%
%
sec
in. WC
in. WC
ppm
ppm
PPb I
Average
1.44
0.027
6.49
55.4
150.O
900.O
487.O
2.1
12.7
110
559
30
9.2
0.067
7:9
8.2
8.7
Oto-3
3.59
5.51
37
Maximum
—
—
—
57.5
152
904
499
21.9
16.4
—
593
45
8.50
0.224
19.8
o
12
<0
37.6
11.8
129
Minimum
—
—
—
45.8
145 -
898
475
-O.99
1O.OO
—
514
16
1O.OO
O
5.5
—
0
-3
0
0
O
Target
condition
5
O.O5
6.51
55
—
90O
50O
0
—
10O
—
—
9
0
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Operational
limits
+/- 10%
+/- 1O%
—
4O-6O
—
850-1000
450-55O
-10 to +1O
<16
80-1 2O
—
—
9-10
3
—
—
<1OO
—
—
•Based on CIMS
"ELS estimate based on a manual valve setting.
-------
TABLE A1-2. CONDITION 1 RUN 2 PROCESS OPERATION SUMMARY
Parameter
Waste water feed rate
Waste oil feed rate
PC E - mass injection rate
Vaporizer pressure
Vaporizer temperature
Reactor temperature
Recirculation heater exit temperature
Reactor pressure
Gas booster differential pressure
Recirculation flowrate **
Scrubber inlet temperature
Scrubber exit temperature
Scrubber liquor pH
System oxygen
Oxygen - boiler stack
Residence time**
Reformed gas pressure
Recirculation vacuum
1-Chtorobenzene*
2-Chlorobenzene*
3-Chtorobenzene*
Monitoring
Station
—
—
—
12
12
2
9
1
7
—
3
6
5
10
11
—
10
7
10
10
10
Units
kg/min
kg/min
g/min
psi
°C
°C
°C
in. WC
in. WC
cfm
°c
°C
—
%
%
sec
in. WC
in. WC
ppm
ppm
ppb
Averaqe
2.75
0.026
6.5O
48.9
147
893
482
1.3
10.4
11O
484
36
7.92
O.053
6.6
6.2
6.7
3
—
• —
<1OO
—
—
"Based on CIMS
""ELI estimate based on a manual valve setting.
-------
TABLE A1-3. CONDITION 1 RUN 3 PROCESS OPERATION SUMMARY
Parameter
Waste water feed rate
Waste oil feed rate
PCE (spike) infection rate
Vaporizer pressure
Vaporizer temperature
Reactor temperature
Recirculatkm heater exit temperature
Reactor pressure
Gas booster differential pressure
Recirculation flowrate *'
Scrubber inlet temperature
Scrubber exit temperature
Scrubber liquor pH
System oxygen
Oxygen - boiler stack
Residence time**
Reformed gas pressure
Recirculation vacuum
1 -Chlorobenzene*
2-Chtorobenzene*
3-Chtorobenzene*
Monitoring
Station
—
—
—
12
12
2
9
1
7
—
3
6
5
10
11
—
10
7
1O
10
10
Units
kg/min
kg/min
q/min
psi
°C
°C
°C
in. WC
in WC
cim
°C
«c
—
%
%
sec
in.WC
in. WC
ppm
ppm
PPb
Average
1.O1
O.O2O
6.35
51.2
148
884
474
2.O
11.6
11O
595
32
9.24
O.O31
6.2
9.5
4
3
—
—
<100
—
—
•Based on CIMS
**ELS estimate based on a manual valve setting.
-------
TABLE At -4.
2 RUN 1 PROCESS OPERATION SU&3EU9ARY
Parameter
Contaminated soil feed rata
Clean steam
Hexachlorobenzene (spike) feed rate
TDU bath temperature
TDU dome temperature
TOU combustion gas temperature
TDU exhaust gas temperature
TDU pressure
Reactor temperature
Recirculation heater exit temperature
Reactor pressure
Gas booster differential pressure
Recirculation flow rate **
Scrubber inlet temperature
Scrubber exit temperature
Scrubber liquor pH
System oxygen
Oxyqen - boiler stack
Residence time**
Reformed gas pressure
Recirculation vacuum
1-Chk>robenzene*
2-Chk>robenzene*
3-Chk>robenzene*
6-Chtorobenzene*
Monitoring
Station
—
13
•—
15
16
17
18
16
2
9
1
7
—
3
6
5
10
11
—
10
7
10
10
10
1O
Units
kg/min
kg/min
q/min
OQ
°c
°c
°C
in. WC
«c
oC
in. WC
in. WC
cfm
°C
°C
%
%
sec
in. WC
in. WC
ppm
ppm
ppb
ppb
Average
2.12
1.89
16.8
616
614
662
398
2.O
89O
480
2.23
10.2
110
506
32
8.42
0.020
6.1O
5.8
8
3
0.03
12 O
569
453
Maximum
—
—
—
645
656
705
452
6.0
893
491
6.24
12.6
—
523
29
8.68
O.027
7.6O
—
15
4
O.62
29.5
488
1330
Minimum
—
—
—
592
589
625
270
O.O
881
467
-O.37
8.3
—
477
3O
8.17
O.016
54O
—
3
2
O.OO
3.O
O
9
Target
condition
10
1
41
—
—
—
—
— •
90O
500
0
—
100
— .
—
—
0
—
— .
—
—
—
—
—
—
Operational
limits
+/- 10%
+/- 10%
_
—
—
—
'. —
850-1000
450-550
-1O to +10
<16
80-120
—
• —
—
3
—
—
<1OO
— ' . '.
—
—
•Based on CIMS
"ELI estimate based on a manual valve setting.
-------
TABLE A1-5. CONDITION 2 RUN 2 PROCESS OPERATION SUMMARY
Parameter
Contaminated soil feed rate
Clean steam ••
Hexachiorobenzene (spike) feed rate
TDU bath temperature
TDU dome temperature
TDU combustion gas temperature
TDU exhaust gas temperature
TDU pressure
Reactor temperature
Recirculatton heater exit temperature
Reactor pressure
Gas booster differential pressure
Recirculation flow rate **
Scrubber inlet temperature
Scrubber exit temperature
Scrubber liquor pH
System oxygen
Oxygen - boiler stack
Residence time**
Reformed gas pressure
Recirculation vacuum
1 -Chlorobenzene*
2-Chiorol>en2ene*
3-Chk>robanzene*
6-Chiorobenzene~
Monitoring
Station
—
13
—
15
16
17
18
16
2
9
1
7
—
3
6
5
1O
11
—
10
7
10
10
10
10
Units
kg/min
q/min
°c
°C
°C
°c
in. WC
°C
°C
in. WC
in. WC
cfm
°c
°C
•
%
%
sec
in. WC
in. WC
ppm
ppnm
ppb
PP**
Average
0.40
1.38
9.87
632
610
653
500
2.5
890
481
2.69
8.09
110
502
32
8.42
0,010
7.57
9.6
2
<0
0.22
12.8
83
1
Maximum
—
—
—
673
676
699
522
3.0
891
492
3.78
9.3
— .
518
34
8.61
O.015
8.3O
—
4
3
—
—
<1OO
—
—
—
•Based on CIMS
**ELI estimate based on a manual valve setting.
-------
TABLE A1-6. CONDITION 3 RUM 1 PROCESS OPERATION SUMMARY
Parameter
Waste water feed rate
Waste oil feed- rate
PCE (spike) injection rate
Vaporizer pressure
Vaporizer temperature
Reactor temperature
Recirculation heater exit temperature
Reactor pressure
Gas booster differential pressure
Recirculation flow rate **
Scrubber inlet temperature
Scrubber exit temperature
Scrubber liquor pH
System oxygen
Oxygen - boiler stack
Residence time
Reformed gas pressure
Recirculation vacuum
1 -Chtorobenzene*
2-Chlorobenzene*
3-Chk>robenzene*
Monitoring
Station
— .
—
—
12
12
2
9
1
7
• . '— '
3
6
5
TO
11
—
10
7
1O
10
1O
Units
kg/min
kg/min
g/min
PSI
°C
oC
<>C
in. WC
in. WC
cfm
°C
«c
—
%
%
sec
in. WC
in. WC
ppm
ppm
DDb
Average
4.74
0.36
13.0
53.1
149.5
901
470
2.10
8.80
110
492
31
9.45
O.058
7.9
3.7
2
O
22.0
8.33
555
Maximum
—
—
—
53.3
150
904
484
3.9
10.5
— ''
540
32
11.40
0.11
8
—
2
***
90.4
27.50
937
Minimum
—
—
—
52.9
149
899
458
0.7
5.5
• • • —
447
3O
7.89
O.O08
7.9
—
1
***
4.51
1.33
201
Target
condition
1
1
13.02
55
—
900
500
O
— • .
100
—
—
9
O
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Operational
limits
+/- 1O%
+/- 10%
—
4O-60
—
85O-10OO
450-550
-10 to +10
<16
8O-12O
—
— •
9-1 0
3
—
—
<10O
—
—
•Based on CIMS
"ELI estimate based on a manual valve setting.
""No valid data obtained due to computer malfunction.
-------
TABLE A1-7. CONDITION 3 RUN 2 PROCESS OPERATION SUMMARY
j Monitoring I
Parameter f Station
Waste water feed rate
Waste oil feed rate
PCE (spike) injection rate
Vaporizer pressure
Vaporizer temperature
Reactor temperature
Recirculation heater exit temperature
Reactor pressure
Gas booster differential pressure
Recirculation flow rate "
Scrubber inlet temperature
Scrubber exit temperature
Scrubber liquor pH
System oxygen
Oxygen - boiler stack
Residence time
Reformed gas pressure
Recirculation vacuum
1 -Chtorobenzene*
2-Chtorobenzene*
3-Chtorobenzene*
—
—
—
12
12
2
9
1
7
—
3
6
5
10
O
—
10
7
10
1O
10
Unils
kg/min
kg/min
g/min
PSI
°C
°C
°C
in. WC
in. WC
cfm
°C
°C
—
%
%
sec
in. WC
in. WC
ppm
ppm
DPb
Average
1.04
0;447
13.1
50.0
***
903
***
1.5
9.1
11O
526
32
8.80
***
8.1
7.0
O
•»*
25.1
6.42
313
Maximum
—
—
—
53.00
***
91 0
•*•
2.0
10.O
—
581
33
10.30
•••
8.14
—
0
•••
52.50
14.4O
522
Minimum
—
—
—
48.00
***
894
***
1.1
8.3
—
423
31
6.40
««*
8.04
—
0
0.045
O.15
40
Target
condition
1
1
13.02
55
—
900
50O
O
—
1OO
—
—
9
O
—
—
—
• —
—
—
—
Operational
limits
+/- 10%
+/- 10%
—
40-6O
—
850-1 OOO
45O-550
-1O to +10
<16
80-120
—
—
9-10
3
—
—
<1OO
—
—
a
•Based on CiMS
**ELI sstiinat© based or. a manual valve setllig.
valid data obtained due to computer malfunction.
-------
TABLE A1-8. CONDITION 3 RUN 3 PROCESS OPERATION SUMMARY
>
•
CO
Parameter
Waste water feed rate
Waste oil feed rate
PCE (spike) injection rate
Vaporizer pressure
Vaporizer temperature
Reactor temperature
Recirculation heater exit temperature
Reactor pressure
Gas booster differential pressure
Recirculation flow rate **
Scrubber inlet temperature
Scrubber exit temperature
Scrubber liquor pH
System oxygen
Oxyqen - boiler stack
Residence time
Reformed gas pressure
Recirculation vacuum
1 -Chlorobenzene"
2-Chlorobenzene*
3-Chtorobenzene*
Monitoring
Station
—
—
—
12
12
2
9
1
7
, —
3
6
5
10
11
—
1O
7
1O
1O
10
Units
kg/min
kg/min
Q/min
PSI
°C
°C
°C
in. WC
in. WC
cfm
°C
°C
—
%
%
sec
in. WC
in. WC
ppm
ppm
DPb
Average
0.83
0.353
13.2
51.0
***
994
•*•
1 -8
5.5
110
562
32
9.7O
***
7.9
7.5
O.O
***•
5.63
4.83
18
Maximum
—
—
—
55.00
*••
995
***
3.4
7.O
—
593
33
1O.20
«a«
793
_
O
*tt*
21 .30
10.90
22O
Minimum
—
—
—
46.00
, - ***
993
***
1.4
3.0
—
514
31
8 9O
ftttft
7.80
.
O
ik**
O
o.oo
0
Target
condition
1
1
13.02
55
—
900
500
0
1OO
_
9
O
_
__
_
Operational
limits
+/- 1O%
+/- 10%
—
4O-6O
85O-1OOO
45O-550
-10 to +10
<16
8O-120
_
._
9-1 0
3
—
<100
—
—
*Based on CIMS
"ELI estimate based on a manual valve setting.
**"No valid data obtained due to computer malfunction.
-------
TABLE A1-9. SUMMARY OF PROCESS FLOW RATES
Con-
dition
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Rur
1
1
1
1
1
1
t
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
Location
SS1
SS11
SS12
SS13
SS14
SS16
SS18
SS2
SS2 SPIKE
SS22
SS4
SS5
SS6
SS7
SS9
SSI
SS11
SS12
SS13
SS14
SS16
SS18
SS2
SS2 SPIKE
SS22
SS4
SS5
SS6
SS7
SS9
SS1
SS11
SS12
SS13
SS14
SS16
SS18
SS2
SS2 SPIKE
SS22
SS4
SS5
SS8
SS7
SS9
Description
Waste water
Reactor grit
Scrubber sludge
Scrubber decant water
Reformed gas
Boiler flue gas
Heat exchanger residue
Waste oil
PCE spike
Scrubber liquor
Scrubber caustic
Scrubber make-up water
Propane
Hydrogen
Boiler combustion air
Waste water
Reactor grit
Scrubber sludge
Scrubber decant water
Reformed gat
Boiler flue gas
Heat exchanger residue
Waste oil
PCE spike
Scrubbed liquor
Scrubber caustic
Scrubbef make-up water
Propane
Hydrogen
Boiler combustion air
Waste water
Reactor grit
Scrubber sludge
Scrubber decant water
Reformed gas
Boiler flue gaa
Heat exchanger residue
Wasted
PCE spike
Scrubber Hquor
Scrubber caustic
Scrubber make-up water
'ropane
•iydrogen
Boiler combustion air
Stream
direction
IN
OUT
OUT
OUT
OUT
OUT
ACCUM
IN
IN
ACCUM
IN
IN
IN
IN
IN
IN
OUT
OUT
OUT
OUT
OUT
ACCUM
IN
IN
ACCUM
IN
IN
IN
IN
IN
IN
OUT
OUT
OUT
OUT
OUT
ACCUM
IN
IN
ACCUM
IN
IN
IN
. IN
IN
Test
time-
waste
jmin}
389
389
389
389
389
389
389
389
389
389
389
369
389
389
389
377
377
377
377
377
377
377
377
377
377
377
377
377
377
377
457
457
457
457
457
457
(457
457
457
457
457
457
457
457
457
Test
time-
boiler
jmin)
389
389
389
389
389
389
389
389
389
389
389
389
389
389
389
377
377
377
377
377
377
377
377
377
377
377
377
377
377
377
457
457
457
457
457
457
457
457
457
457
457
457
457
457
457
Initial
density
(oA)
»
-
-
-
-
on
1000
-
-
1021
_
-
-
-
.,
• -
-
-
-
-
1000
-
-
990
-
-
-
-
-
-
.
.
-
.
-
1000
-
-
990
-
-
-
-
-
Final
density
fCj/l)
-
-
-
-
-
-
1000
-
-
981
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
•-
-
1000
-
-
971
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
1000
-
-
971
-
-
-
-
-
Average
density
(9/U
980
2204
2200
990
0.753
1.19
-
1000
-
-
1050
980
1.76
0.0833
1.20
980
2204
2200
990
0.689
1.19
-
1COC
-
-
1050
980
1.76
0.0833
1.20
971
2204
2200
990
0.801
1.19
-
1006
-
-
105C
986
1.7(5
0.0333
1.2C
Total
mass
JkgL
558
•0.871
•20.1
•630
•68.2
•1630
0.00
10.4
2.25
146
92.2
0.00
43.5
1.38
1527
1037
•0.308
.-20.1
-634
•11.9
•141)4
0.00
9.75
2.24
31.6
88.1
0.00
47.9
0.712
1394
463
•&104
•20.1
•746
•6S.8
•1773
0.00
9.30
2.23
38.3
188
0.00
88.0
0.658
1666
Mass rate •
waste
processing
jk^hr)
86.1
•0.134
, -3.10
: . -97.2
! -10.5
'
0.00
1.61
i 0.348
. 22.5
14.2
O.GO
;
0.213
-
165
. -0.0481
•3.20
•101
•8.26
;
; 0.00
! 1.55
0.356
§.63
14.0
O.!)0
-
0.113
-
§9.7
•0.0137
-2.84
•97.9
•7.03
-
, o.oo
1J22
0.2*52
! 5.03
24.7
0.00
•
0.08*4
',
Mass
rate-
boiler
fkqmf)
_
_
-
»
•10.5
•251
~
-.
-
«
-.
-•
6.71
-
236
„
=,
-
_
•8.23
•239
-
•
„
-
..
0,
7.62
-
222
.
.
.
_
•7.03
•233
-
-
.
-
-
-
8.53
219
AMO
-------
TABLE A1-9. SUMMARY OF PROCESS FLOW RATES
(continued)
Con-
dition
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
. 1
2
2
2
2
2
2
Run
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
Location
-i-
SS10
SS11
SS12
SS13
SS14
SS16
SS20
SS22
SS24
SS3
SS3 SPIKE
SS4
SS5
SS6
SS7
SS9
—
SS10
SS11
SS12
SS13
SS14
SS18
SS20
SS22
SS24
SS3
SS3 SPIKE
SS4
SS5
sse
SS7
SS9
• Description
Clean steam
Treated soil
Reactor grit
Scrubber sludge
Scrubber decant water
Reformed gai
Boiler flue gas
TDU molten bath
Scrubber liquor
TDU quench water
Contaminated soil
HC8 spike
Scrubber causflc
Scrubber make-up water
Propane
Hydrogen
Boiler combustion air
Clean steam
Treated soil
Reactor grit
Scrubber sludge
Scrubber decant water
Reformed gas
Boiler flue gas
TDU molten bath
Scrubber liquor
TDU quench water
Contaminated sd
HCB spike
Scrubber caustic
Scrubber make-up water
Propane
Hydrogen
Boiler combustion air
Stream
direction
IN
OUT
OUT
OUT
OUT
OUT
OUT
ACCUM
ACCUM
ACCUM
IN
IN
IN
IN
IN
IN
IN
IN
OUT
OUT
OUT
OUT
OUT
OUT
ACCUM
ACCUM
ACCUM
IN
IN
IN
IN
IN
IN
IN
Test
time-
waste
(min)
362
362
362
362
362
362
362
362
362
362
362
382
362
362
362
362
362
496
498
498
496
498
496
498
496
496
498
498
498
498
496
496
496
496
Test
time-
boiler
(min)
362
362
362
362
362
362
362
362
362
362
362
362
362
362
362
362
362
496
498
496
498
496
496
496
498
496
498
498
491
498
498
496
496
498
Initial
density
ffr1)
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
5750
980
1000
-
-
•
-
-
-
-
-
- -
-
-
-
-
-
5750
1000
1000
-
-
-
-
. -
-
-
Final
density
(M
-
-
.. -
-
-
-
-
5750
990
1000
eo
-
-
. -
"
-
' -
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
57SO
980
1000
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Average
density
(g/U
-
-
2200
2200
990
0.561
1.17
•-
-
-
-
-
1050
1000
1.76
0.0633
1.20
-
-
2200
2200
990
0.545
1.17
-
-
-
-
.
1050
1000
1.76
0.0833
1.20
Total
mass
(kq)
665
•767
•0.249
•2.81
•531
•44.9
•1673
0.00
•34.9
'15.9
767
9.53
232
0.00
57.5
0.562
1565
685
•211
•0.363
•3.61
•674
•27.7
•3215
0.00
72,1
222
196
4.83
196
0.00
114
0.703
3070
Mass rate •
waste
>rocessing
(kg/hr)
114
•127
•0.0414
•0.466
•88.0
•7.44
_
0.00
•5.79
•2.63
127
1.58
38.5
0.00
.
0.0932
-
82.9
•25.5
•0.0439
•0.436
•81.5
'•3.36
-
0.00
8.72
2.6S
23.7
0.584
23.J
O.OC
•
0.08K
«
Mass
rate-
boiler
(kq/hr)
.
«,
.
-
' SB
•7.44
•277
-
.
,
.-
-
-
-
9.53
.
259
-
-
f
-
-
•3.36
•389
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
13.8
-
371
AM1
-------
TABLE A1-9. SUMMARY OF PROCESS FLOW RATES
(continued)
Con-
dition
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
'3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
Run
•
<
1
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
Location
SSI
SS11
SS12
SS13
SS14
SS15
SS16
SS18
SS2
SS2 SPIKE
SS22
SS4
SSS
SS6
SS7
SS9
SS1
SS11
SS12
SS13
SS14
SS15
SS16
SS18
SS2
SS2 SPIKE
SS22
SS4
SSS
SS6
SS7
SS9
SS1
SS11
SS12
SS13
SS14
SS15
SS16
SS18
SS2
SS2 SPIKE
SS22
SS4
SSS
3S8 - •
SS7
•3S9
Description
Wasto wator
Reactor grit
Scrubber sludge
Scrubber decant water
Reformed gas
Tank condensata
Boiler flue gas
Heat exchanger residue
Waste oil
PCE spike
Scrubber liquor
Scrubber caustic
Scrubber make-up water
Propane
Hydrogen
Boiler* combustion air
Waste water
Reactor grit
Scrubber sludge
Scrubber decant water
Reformed gas
Tank condensata
Boiler flue gas
Heat exchanger residue
Waste oil
PCEspiks
Scrubber liquor
Scrubber caustic
Scrubber make-up water
Propane
Hydrogen
Boiler combuttion air
Waste water
Reactor grit
Scrubber sludge
Scrubber decant water
Reformed gas
Tank condensata
Boiler (togas
Heat exchanger residua
Waste ol
PCEspika
Scrubber liquor
Scrubber caustic
Scrubber make-up water
'ropahe
•iydrogen
Boiler combustion air
Stream
direction
IN
OUT
OUT
OUT
OUT
OUT
OUT
ACCUM
IN
IN
ACCUM
IN
IN
IN
IN
IN
IN
OUT
OUT
OUT
OUT
OUT
OUT
ACCUM
IN
IN
ACCUM
IN
IN
IN
IN
IN
IN
OUT
OUT
OUT
OUT
OUT
OUT
ACCUM
IN
IN
ACCUM
IN
IN
IN
IN '
IN
Test
time-
waste
(min)
55
5§
, 55
55
55
55
55
55
55
55
55
55
55
55
55
55
169
169
169
169
169
169
169
169
169
169
169
169
169
169
169
168
156
156
156
156
156
156
156
156
156
156
156
156
156
156
156
156
Test
time-
boiler
JminJ_
431
431
431
431
431
431
431
431
431
431
431
431
431
431
431
431
787
787
787
787
787
787
767
787
787
767
787
787
767
767
787
767
1417
1417
1417
1417
1417
1417
1417
1417
1417
1417
1417
1417
1417
1417
1417
1417
Initial
density
(fl/l)
«
-
OB
_
-
-
-
1000
-
-
981
-
-
-
-
«
-
-
'-
-
-
-
-
1000
-
-
981
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
1000
-
-
990
-
-
-
-
-
Final
density
ffl/l)
.
-
-
-
. -
-
-
1000
-
-
971
.
-
-
-
-
OB
-
-
-
-
-
-
. 1000
-
-
990
-
-
•
'
-
c.
-
-
-
-
-
-
1000
-
-
990
-
-
-
-
-
Average
density
(9/U
971
2204
2200
990
0.545
1000
1.19
-
1000
-
-
1050
980
1.78
0.0833
1.20
981
2204
2200
990
0.481
1000
1.19
-
1000
-
-
10SO
980
1.76
0.0833
1.20
990
2204
2200
990
0.465
1000
1.19
-
1000
-
-
1050
980
1.76
0.0833
1.20
Total
mass
J&L
261
•0.0907
•30.1
•216
•13.7
•0.188
•3233
0.00
19.S
0.649
34.9
76.1
0.00
124
0.0880
• 3102
175
•0.288
•503
•1058
•42.9
-1.09
•3609
0.00
7S.S
1.96
•34.9
453
• 598
126
0.1S4
3448
' 138
•0.263
•40.2
•1158
•50.3
•1.91
•72S7
0.00
5S.1
1.91
0.00
276
837
27S
0.222
6941
Mass rate •
waste
processing
(kgfcr)
' 284
•0.0990
•32.9
' -233
•14.9
•0.203
'
0.00
21.3
0.708
; 38.1
83.0
0.00
;
0.0742
.
• 62.2
•0.101
•17.8
•375
•15.2
•0.386
-
o.co
2@.8
Q.m
•12.4
181
212
'
0.0548
'
i §3,0
; -0,101
•15,5
•445
\ -19.4
•0.733
'.
0.00
21.2
0.733
0.00
106
322
I
1 0.0655
i
Mass
rate-
boiler
fk^hr}
=
«.
-
_
•1.91
-
•450
-
=
-
-
-
-
17.3
-
432
«
.
o m>
j>
•3.36
-
•282
-
..
„
-
-
-
9.89
=.
270
~
n
=
~
•2.13
r
•307
..
™
-
-
-
11.7
294
' sign in front of mass and mass rate indicates net flow direction out of system
AM 2
-------
APPENDIX 2
SUMMARY OF RESULTS
» -
Tables A2-1 through A2-20 summarize results of all measurements for individual samples of each
stream. Each table is annotated with numbered flags indicating any notes regarding the data. A key to
Stream
SS1
SS2
SS3
SS4
sss
SS6
SS7
SS9
SS10
SS11
SS12
SS13
SS14
SS15
SS16
SS18
SS19
SS20
SS22
SS24
Description
Waste water
Waste oil
Contaminated sol
Scrubber caustic
Scrubber makeup water
Propane
Hvdrooen
Combustion air
Treated soils
Reactor grit
Scrubber sludge
Scrubber decant water
Reformed gas
Reformed gas storage
tankcondensate
Boiler stack gat
Heat exchanoer residual
TDUexitoas
Molten bath
Scrubber liquor
TDD quench water
Table
No.
2-1
2-2
2-3
2-4
2-5
2-6
2-7
2-8
2-9
2-10
2-11
2-12
2-13
2-14
2-15
2-19
2-17
2-18
2-19
2-20
. Results
Flow rate, moisture, PCBs, CBs, CPs, PAHs, PCDDs, PCDFs, VOCs, trace metals, C, S,
hexavaient Cr. density. oH. chlorides
Flow rate, moisture, PCBs, CBs, CPs, PAHs, PCODs, PCDFs, VOCs, trace metals, C, H,
N, 0, P, d, F, S, hexavalentCr, ash, density; pH, chlorides
Flow rate, moisture, PCBs, CBs, CPs, PAHs, PCODs, PCOFs, VOCs, trace metals, C, S,
ash, hexavalent Cr, density. oH, chlorides. TCLP volaSes, TCLP trace metals
Flow rate, trace metals, S, hexavalent Cr, density, pH, chlorides
Flow rate, moisture, trace metals. S, hexavalent Cr, density, oH, chlorides
Flow rate, PCBs, CBs, CPs, VOCs, C, H, N, 0, P, a, F, S, hexavalentCr, ash, density, pH,
chlorides
Ftowrate. moisture. PCBs, CBs, CPs, VOCs
Ftowrate, moisture, PCBs, CBs, CPs, VOCs, sulfur compounds, fixed gases
Bowrate, moisture, PCBs, CBs, CPs, PAHs, doxins, furans, VOCs, trace metals, chlorides,
C. S, ash, hexavalent Cr. TCLP vdatiles, TCLP trace metals
Ftowrate, moisturo, PCBs, CBs, CPs, PAHs, doxins, furans, VOCs, trace metals, chlorides,
C. S. ash hexavatent Cr. TCLP voiaties, TCLP trace metals
Ftowrate, mojsturo, CBs, CPs, PAHs, dwxins, furans, VOCs, trace metals, chlorides, S,
hexavalent Cr, density, pH, TCLP volatile*, TCLP trace metals, PCBs
Ftowrate, moisture, PCBs, CBs, CPs, PAHs, dwxins, furans, trace metals, C, S, hoxavalent
Cr. density. oH. chlorides. C. H. N. Cl. F. P. 0. VOCs
Ftowrate, moisture, PCBs, CBs, CPs, doxins, furans, VOCs, sulfur compounds, fixed gases
hydrocarbons, heafirw value
Ftowrate, moisture, PCBs, CBs, CPs, PAHs, dnxins, furans, VOCs, trace metals, C, S,
hexavalent Cr. chlorides
Ftowrate, moisture, PCBs, CBs, CPs, PAHs, PCODs, PCDFs, VOCs, trace metals, NOx,
S02, CO, C02, 02, THC, paniculate, Hd, opacity
'C 3s. CBs. CPs. PAHs. djoxins. furans. trace metals, C. S. hexavalent Cr. chlorides. VOC
>C 3s, CBs. CPs, doxins. furans, VOCs
Trace metals
Moisture, PCBs, CBs, CPs, PAHs, PCODs, PCOFs, VOCs, trace metals, C, S, hoxavalent
Cr. density. oH. chlorides. C. H. N. a. F. P
PCBs, CBs, CPs, PAHs, PCDDs, PCOFs, VOCs, trace metals, S, hexavalent Cr, ash, C,
chlorides
the flag numbers is provided at the end of this appendix. Flow rates are the net flow rate in or out of
the system during actual test periods. Flow rates for reformed gas (SS18) during Condition 3 are rates
during waste processing. Reformed gas flow rate during boiler testing was much lower. See appendix
A1 for additional process flow rate information. Where shown, a "•" sign indicates net flow out of system
for streams which accumulate (see Appendix 3 for additional information on accumulated streams). Please
refer to the table of Abbreviations and Symbols at the front of the appendices for key to nomenclature
used on tables.
A2-1
-------
TABLE A2-1. SS1 • WASTE WATER SUMMARY
Substance
Total stream flow rate
Poly
Ohio
Units
kg/hr
Ib/hr
Uhr
CONDITION 1 • WASTE WATER
Flag Run 1
86.1
190
87.9
Flag Run 2
165
364
168
Flag Run 3
60.7
134
62.6
Average
104.0
229.3
108.3
chlorinated blphenyle(PCb)
Monoerttorobiprtenyl (total)
Dichkxobiphenyl (total)
Trichtorobiphenyl (total)
Tetraehlofobiphenyl (total)
P«ntachtorobiph«nyl (total)
Hexachtorobiphenyl (total)
Heptachlorobiphenyl (total)
Octachlorobiphflnyl (total)
Nonachlofobiphufryl (total)
Decachlorobiphenyl (total)
Total PCBs (trktoca) inducing NDs
Total PCBs (mono-deca) including NOi
Total PCBs (tri-deca) excluding NOs
Total PCBs (mono-cleca) excluding NOs
^9/L
M/L
ng/L
ng/L
^9/L
WL
ng/L
MI/L
WL
H9t
H9/L
ng/L
WL
H9/L
NO 0.3
SQL 0.4
SQL 0.34
BQL 0.2
SQL 0.01
NO 8,5
NO 7.3
NO 3.6
NO 0.91
NO 0.51
< 21.4
< 22.1
> 0.55
> 0.95
BQL 0.08
3.3
3.5
BQL 2.7
BQL 0.62
BQL 0.06
NO 9.5
NO 4.7
NO 1.2
NO 0.66
< 22.9
< 26.3
> 6.88
> 10.26
NO 0.29
3
2.4
BQL 1.7
BQL 0.51
BQL 0.02
ND 7
ND 3.6
ND 0.88
ND 0.49
< 16.6
< 19.9
> 4.63
> 7.63
< 0.22
< 2.23
< 2.08
BQL 1.53
BQL 0.38
< 2.86
ND 7.93
ND 3.97
ND 1.00
NO 0.55
< 20.3
< 22.8
> 4.00
> 6.28
robenzenee and chloropftenolt
1,2-Diehlorobenzene
1.3-Dlcrilorobenzone
1,4-Dlehlorobenzene
Total dfchtorobenzenes
1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene
1,3,5-TrJchlorobenzen*
1,2,4-TrJcMorobenzene
Total trichlorobenzenes
1,2,3,4-Tetrachlorobenzene
1,2,3,5- and/or 1,2.4,5-Tetracntoro- benzene
Total totrachlorobenzenes
Pentachtorobenzene
Hoxachlorobenzene
2,3-DICfllofophenol
2,4-Dlchlorophenol
2,5-Dldilofopbenol
2,6-Dichlorophenol
3,4-Dlchlorophenol
3,5-OlGhlofophenol
Total dichlorophenols
2,3,4-Trichlofophenol
2,3,5-Trichlorophenol
2,3,6
-------
TABLE A2-1. SS1 - WASTE WATER SUMMARY
(continued)
Substanc*
Units
CONDITION 1 • WASTE WATER
Flag Run 1 flag Run 2 |F ag Run 3 Average
Polyeycllc aromatic hydrocarbons (PAH) N
Dlo:c
Naphthalene
2-Methyinaphthalene
2-CI-Naphthalene
Acenaphftylene
Acenapthene
Fluorene
Phenanthreno
Anthracene
Fluoranthene
Pyrene
Benzo (a) anthracene
Chrysene
Benzo (b)fluoranthen«
Benzo (k) fluoranthene
Benzo (e)pyrene
Benzo (a) pyrene
Peryiene
lndeno(12,3-cd) pyrene
Dibonz (a,h) anthracene
Benzo (g.h.i) perylene
Total PAHs including NO*
Total PAHs excluding NDs
pg/L
Wfl.
ug/L
WL
ng/L
Ml
W«.
jig/L
ng/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
WL
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
\i.g/L
wgo.
ngyt
ng/t
NO
NO
ND
NO
ND
ND 1
NO 1
ND 1
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND 1
NO 1
NO 1
NO 1
NO 1
NO 1
ND 1
ND 20
all NO
NO 1.2
ND 1.2
NO 1.2
NO 1.2
NO 1.2
NO 1.2
NO 1.2
NO 1.2
NO 1.2
NO 1.2
NO 1.2
NO 1.2
NO 1.2
NO 1.2
NO 1.2
NO 1.2
NO 1.2
ND 1.2
NO 1.2
ND 1.2
NO 24
ail NO
NO 0.99
NO 0.99
NO 0.99
ND 0.99
NO 0.99
NO 0.99
NO 0.99
NO 0.99
NO 0.99
ND 0.99
NO 0.99
NO 0.99
ND 0.99
NO 0.99
ND 0.99
NO 0.99
ND 0.99
NO 0.99
NO 0.99
NO 0.99
ND 19.8
all ND
ND 1.06
NO 1.06
ND 1.06
ND 1.06
ND 1.06
NO 1.06
ND 1.06
NO 1.06
NO 1.06
ND 1.06
ND 1.06
ND 1.06
ND 1.06
ND 1.06
ND 1.06
ND 1.06
NO 1.06
NO 1.06
ND 1.06
ND 1.06
ND 21.27
all NO
ntandfurans
2378 TCDD
12378 PeCOO
123478 HxCDO
1 23878 HxCDD
123789 HxCDO
1 234678 HpCDD
OCDD
2378 TCDF
12378P8COF .
23478 PeCDP
1 23478 HxCDF
123878 HXCDF
234678 HxCOF
123789 HxCDF
1 234678 HpCDF
1 234789 HpCDF
OCOF
TCDD (total)
PeCDD (total)
HxCDO (total)
HpCDD (total)
TCOF (total)
PeCDF (total)
HxCDF (total)
HpCDF (total)
Total doxins (by isomer) inducing NDs
Total furans (by liomer) inducing NDs
Total doxin/furans (by isomer) in NDs
Total doxin* (by isom«r) exdudng NDs
Total furans (by isomer) exdudng NDs
Total doxin/furans (by isomer) »x NOs
ng/L
ng/L
ng/L
ng/L
ng/L
ng/L
ng/L
ng/L
ng/L
ng/L
ng/L
ng/L
ng/L
ng/L
ng/L
ng/L
ng/L
ng/L
ng/L
ng/L
ng/L
ng/L
ng/L
ng/L
ng/L
ng/L
ng/L
ng/L
ng/L
ng/L
ng/L
NO 0.01
ND 0.003
NO 0.002
ND 0.004
NO 0.002
0.02
F 0.12
0.01
NO 0.01
NO 0.01
0.005
F 0.002
NO 0.004
ND 0.002
0.01
ND 0.003
0.02
0.01
NO 0.05
F 0.01
F 0.02
0.03
NO 0.23
0.01
0.03
< 0.16
< 0.07
< 023
> 0.10
> 0.09
> 0.19
NO 0.005
NO 0.003
NO 0.003
0.004
NO 0.004
0.06
0.52
0.03
0.02
0.02
0.01
F 0.00
0.01
ND 0.00
0.04
ND 0.004
0.09
0.02
0.01
0.02
• 0.12
027
0.09
0.05
0.09
< 0.60
< 022
< 0.82
> 0.58
> 022
> 0.80
NO 0.002
NO 0.003
NO 0.004
0.01
0.004
0.07
F 0.35
0.02
0.01
0.01
0.01
. ND 0.004
NO 0.004
. NO 0.003
0.03
ND 0.01
0.03
0.04
0.04
0.10
0.14
0.07
0.04
0.03
0.04
< 0.44
< 0.12
< 0.57
>' 0.43
> 0.11
> 0.54
NO 0.005
NO 0.003
NO 0.003
< 0.005
< 0.003
0.050
0.330
0.020
< 0.011
< 0.010
0.009
< 0.003
< 0.006
NO 0.003
0.026
ND 0.005
0.046
0.023
< 0.030
0.042
0.092
0.121
< 0.120
0.030
0.054
< 0.401
< 0.139
< 0.539
> 0.380
> 0.130
> 0.510
A2-3
-------
TABLE AM, SS1 - WASTE WATER SUMMARY
(continued)
Substance
Units
CONDITION 1 • WASTi: WATER
Flag Run 1 hag Run 2 Flag Flun3 Averago
Volatile organic compounds :
Vinyl chloride
Methyl chloride
Trans* 1 ,2-dtehloroethene
Cl3'1,2'tfchloroalhene
Chloroform
1,1,1-Tricriloroettiane
Carbon tetrachtoride
Benzeno
1,2-Dichloroethane
Trlchtoroethene
Toluene
1,1,2-Trichloroelnane
Tetrachloroelhene
1,2-Dlbromoethane
Chtorobonzene
Ethylbenzene
M-/P-Xy!ene
0-Xylen*
1,3-Dlchlorobenzene
M-Dlchlorobenzene
1,2-Dlchlorobenzene
H9A.
W/L
ng/L
M8/L
^
ng/L
ng/L
ug/L
ng/L
ng/L
ngfl.
ug/L
ug/L
ugfl.
ug/L
lig/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
NO 2
14
NO a
NO 2
NO 2
NO 2
NO 2
NO 2
NO '2
SQL 2
NO 2
NO 2
NO 2
NO 2
NO 2
NO 2
NO 2
NO 2
NO I
NO 2
NO 2
NO 2
BQL 2
BQL 2
BQL 2
NO 2
BQL 2
BQL 2
BQL 5
NO 2
BQL 2
NO 2
NO 2
BQL 2
NO 2
NO 2
NO 2
NO 2
NO 2
NO 2
NO 2
NO 2
.NO 2
NO :2
NO 2
NO !2
NO 2
NO 2
NO 2
BQL 4
NO 2
NO 2
NO 2
NO 2
NO 2
NO 2
NO 2
NO 2
NO 2
NO 2
NO 2
NO 2
NO 2
NO 2.0
< e.o
< 2.0
< 2.0
NO 2.0
< 2.0
< 2.0
< 3.7
NO 2.0
< 2.0
NO 2.0
NO 2.0
< 2.0
NO 2.0
NO 2.0
NO 2.0
NO 2.0
NO 2.0
NO 2.0
ND 2'.0
NO 2.0
Tract m«Ulo
Antimony
Arsonic
Barium
Beryllium
Cadmium
Chromium (total)
Copper
Load
Manganaw
Mercury
Nickel
Phosphorus
Selenium
Silver
Thallium
Tin
Zinc
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
jig/L
ug/L
ng/L
ugA.
jigl
ugl
ng/l
H9^-
ngt
ngA=
s*gA.
WL
ug/L
NO 100
NO 100
440
NO 10
NO 10
NO 10
: . 2§
54
170
NO 0.2
NO 10
150
NO 100
NO 10
NO 100
NO 100
160
NO 100
NO 100
350
NO 10
NO 10
NO 10
23
NO 50
NO 10
NO 0.2
NO 10
210
NO 100
NO 10
NO 100
NO 100
270
NO 100
NO 100
370
NO 10
NO 10
13
28
57
200
NO 0.2
NO 10
250
NO 100
NO '10
NO 100
NO 100
440
NO' 100.0
ND 100.0
386.7
NO 10.0
NO 10.0
< 11.0
26.7
- 53.7
< 127
NO 0.20
ND 10.0
203.3
NO 100.0
NO 13.0
NO too.e
NO 100.0
290.0
Mllcallaneout
TotaJ organic carbon
Total sulfur (as S)
Organic halogens (as chloride)
Inorganic halogens (as chloride)
Hexavalont chromium
ppmw
wt%
ppbw
ppmw
ppmw
21.9
31 0.002
30 103
1600
0.01
10.8
31 0.002
30 1380
1200
NO 0.01
8.9
31 0.003
30 66.5
1400
NO 0.01
13.9
0.002
517
1400
< 0.010
Physical cflartcterittJet
Density
PH
g/ce
-
0.98
10.0
0.98
7.8
0.97
7.7
0.98
8.5
A24
-------
TABLE A2-1. SS1 - WASTE WATER SUMMARY
(continued)
Substance
Total atraam flow rate
Poly
Chlo
Units
kg/hr
Ib/hr
Utir
chlorinated blpnanyte (PCS)
Monochtorobiphenyi (total)
Dichkxobiphsnyl (total)
Trichtorobiphsnyl (total)
Tstrachlorobiphonyl (total)
Pentachtorobiphenyl (total)
H«xachlorobiph«nyl (total)
Hsptachlofobiphenyl (total)
Octachtorobiphanyl (total)
Nonachlorobiphwiyl (total)
Decachlorobiphenyl (total)
Total PCBs (tri-deca) including NOs
Total PCBs (monc-deca) including ND«
Total PCBs (tri-daca) excluding N0«
Total PCBs (mono-doca) sxdudng ND»
vgn.
HS/l-
H9/L
|ig/L
ng/v.
ust
H9/L
ugrt.
ng/L
ust
H9rt-
ugA-
ngt
usfl.
rob«nz«nM and ehlorophcnoto
1 ,2-Dichlorob«nz*n«
1 ,3-Dichlorobenzene
1 ,4-Dichlorobenzon»
Total dtahtorob«nzerta»
1 ,2,3-Trichlorobonzan*
1 ,3,5-Trichlofobenzen*
1,2,4-Trichlorob«nz«o»
Total trichlorobonzanes
1 ,2,3,4-Tetrachlorobanzan*
1,2.3,5- and/or 1,2,4.5-T«trachloro- b«nz«n«
Total tatrachlorob«nz«n««
Pantachtorob«oz9n»
H0xachlorobonzan«
2,3-DlchlCfophanol
2,4-Dichloroph«nol
2.5-Oichloropbonol
2.6-Dichloroph«nol
3.4-Oichlorophsnol
3,S-Dldiloroph«nol
Total dteh(oroph«nol»
2.3,4-Trichioroph«nol
2.3.S"Trichloroph«nol
2.3.9-Trichloroph«nol
2,4,5-Trichlofophanol
2,4,8-Trichlorophsnol
Total trichkxophanols
2.3,4,5- and/or 2,3,4,6-Tetrachtofophenol
2.3,5.6-Tatracntorophanol
Total tatracnlorophwtols
P«ntachkxoptwnol
Total CB including NO*
Total CP Including ND«
Total C8 axdudng N0»
Total CP oxdudng NDs
H9t
jigrt.
jtg/L
ugA-
H9A-
pgt
^eyu
^gt
jigA.
jigt
H9t-
»&.
R*L
M9A.
ng/L
H3/L
t»gA-
J»9t
jtg"-
ngfl.
HO/L
ngt
ug/L
^flA-
ng'i.
ngft-
HOA.
jig/L
ncyi.
^9/1.
*&-
jigrt.
H9A.
HS/L
CONDITION 3 - WASTE OIL
Flag Run 1
284
627
293
Flag Run 2
62.2
137
63.4
Flag Run 3
53.0
117
53.6
SQL 0.04
6.4
9.7
BQL 9.4
SQL 3.8
BQL 0.47
BQL 0.067
NO 4.4
NO 1.1
NO 0.62
< 29.6
< • 36.0
> 23.40
> 29.90
BQL 0.06
1.S5
BQL 1.1
BQL 0.61
BQL 0.14
NO 8.4
NO 7.2
NO 3.6
NO 0.9
• NO 0.5
< 22.4
< 24.1
> 1.85
> 3.46
BQL 0.02
BQL 0.62
BQL 1
BQL 1.25
BQL 0.53
BQL .0.05
NO 7.2
NO 3.6
NO 0.9
NO 0.5
< 15.0
< 15.7
> 2.83
> 3.47
Avoraga
133.2
293.6
136.7
BQL 0.039
< 2.855
< 3.933
BQL 3.753
BQL 1.487
BQL 2.975
< 4.822
NO 3.867
NO 0.967
NO 0.540
< 22.34
< 25.24
> 9.36
> 12.28
34 NO 0.98
34 NO 0.98
34 NO 0.98
34 NO 2.94
34 NO 0.98
34 NO 0.98
34 NO 0.98
34 NO 2.94
34 NO 0.98
34 NO 2
34 NO 2.98
34 NO 0.98
34 NO 0.98
34 NO 0.98
34 NO 0.98
34 NO 0.98
34 NO 0.98
34 NO 0.98
34 NO 0.98
34 NO 5.88
34 NO 0.98
34 NO 0.98
34 NO 0.98
34 NO 0.98
34 NO 0.98
34 NO 4.9
34 NO 2
34 NO 0.98
34 NO 2.98
34 NO 0.98
34 NO 10.82
34 NO 14.74
efl NO
all NO
34 NO 1
34 NO 1
34 NO 1
34 NO 3
34 NO 1
34 NO 1
34 NO 1
34 NO 3
34 NO 1
34 NO 2
34 NO 3
34 NO 1
34 NO 1
34 NO 1
34 NO
34 NO
34 NO
34 NO
34 NO
34 NO 6
34 NO
34 NO
34 NO
34 NO
34 NO 1
34 NO 5
34 NO 2
34 NO 1
34 NO 3
34 NO 1
34 NO 11
34 NO 15
att NO
all NO
34 NO 0.96
34 NO 0.96
34 NO 0.96
34 NO 2.88
34 NO 0.96
34 NO 0.96
34 NO 0.96
34 NO 2.88
34 NO 0.96
34 NO 1.90
34 NO 2.86
34 NO 0.96
34 NO 0.96
34 Nb 0.96
34 NO 0.96
34 NO 0.96
34 NO 0.96
34 NO 0.96
34 NO 0.9«
34 NO 5.76
34 NO 0.96
34 NO 0.96
34 NO 0.96
34 NO 0.96
34 NO 0.96
34 NO 4.80
34 NO 1.90
34 NO 0.96
34 NO 2.86
34 NO 0.96
34 NO 10.5
34 NO 14.4
all NO
afl NO
NO 0.980
NO 0.980
NO 0.980
NO 2.940
NO 0.980
NO 0.980
NO 0.980
NO 2.940
NO 0.980
NO 1.967
NO 2.947
NO 0.980
NO 0.980
NO 0.980
NO 0.980
NO 0.980
NO 0.980
NO 0.980
NO 0.980
NO 5.880
NO 0.980
NO 0.980
NO 0.980
NO 0.980
NO 0.980
NO 4.900
NO 1.967
NO 0.980
NO 2.947
NO 0.98C
NO 10.79
NO 14.71
al NO
al NO
A2-5
-------
TABLE A2-1. SS1 - WASTE WATER SUMMARY
(continued)
Substance
Units
Polycycllc aromatic hydrocarbon* (PAH)
Naphthalene
2-Methylriaphthalene
2-CI-NaphthaIene
Acenaphthylene
Acenapthene
Ftuorene
Phenanthrene
Anthracene
Fluoranthene
Pyrene
Benzo (a) anthracene
Chryaene
Benzo (b) fluoranthene
Benzo (k) fluoranthene
Bonzo (•) pyrene
Benzo (a) pyrene
Perylene
Indeno (12,3-cd) pyrene
Oibenz (a,h) anthracene
Banzo (g.h.l) perylene
Total PAHs including NDs
Total PAHs exdudhig NO*
ug/L
figfl-
• JtgA-
fig/L
|ig/L
H9".
ug/L
WL
u.g/L
ngfl-
ug/L
ug/L
u.g/L
ug/L
jigfl.
ugfl.
\ig/\.
jtg'i-
tig«.
ngrt.
ngrt.
ngfl-
DktJdris and furans
2378 TCOO
12378 PeCOD
123478 HxCDD
123878 HxCOD
123789 HxCDO
1234878 HpCDD
OCDD
2378 TCDF
12378 PeCDF
23478 PoCDF
123478 HxCDF
123878 HXCOF
234878 HxCDF
123789 HxCDF
1234878 HpCDF
1234789 HpCDF
OCOF
TCOD (total)
PeCDD (total)
HxCDD (total)
HpCDD (total)
TCDF (total)
PeCDF (total)
HxCDF (total)
HpCDF (total)
Total doxins (by Isomer) Indudng NO*
Total tofans (by tsomer) including NDs
Total d oxin/furans (by Isomer) In NDs
Total doxlns (by Isomer) excluding NDs
Total ftirans (by Isomer) excluding NDs
Total doxin/furans (by isomer) ex NDs
ng/L,
ng/t
ng/t.
ng/U
ng/L
ng/L
ng/L
ngrt.
ng/L
ng/L
ng/L
ng/L
ng/L
ng/L
ng/L
ng/L
ng/L
ng/L
ng/L
ng/L
ng/L
ng/L
ng/L
ng/L
ng/L
ng/L
ng/L
ng/L
ng/L
ng/L
ng/L
CONDITION 3 - WASTE OIL
Flag Run 1 |Flag Run 2 (Flag Run 3 Average
NO 0.98
NO 0.98
NO 0.98
NO 0.98
NO 0.98
NO 0.98
NO 0.98
NO 0.98
SQL 2.5
BQL 1.9
NO 0.98
NO 0.98
BQL 1.1
NO 0.98
NO 0.98
NO 0.98
NO 0.98
NO 0.98
NO 0.98
NO 0.98
, < 22.16
> 5.80
BQL 4.7
ND 1
NO 1
ND 1
NO 1
NO 1
BQL 5.2
NO 1
BQL 1.6
BQL 1.5
NO 1
ND 1
NO 1
NO 1
ND 1
ND 1
NO 1
NO 1
NO 1
NO 1
< 29.0
> 8.30
BQL 4.70
ND 0.96
NO 0.96
ND 0.96
NO 0.96
ND 0.96
NO 0.96
ND 0.96
BQL 1.10
BQL 1.10
ND 0.96
ND 0.96
ND 0.96
ND 0.96
NO 0.96
ND 0.96
ND 0.96
ND 0.96
ND 0.96
ND 0.96
< 23.2
> 2.20
< 3.460
ND 0.980
ND 0.980
NO 0.980
ND 0.980
NO 0.980
< 2.380
ND 0.980
< 1.733
< 1.500
ND 0.980
NO 0.980
< 1.020
ND 0.980
ND 0.980
ND 0.980
NO 0.980
ND 0.980
ND 0.980
NO 0.980
< 24.79
> S.36
0.003
ND 0.005
0.004
0.02
NO 0.01
: ' 0.44
2.80
0.10
; O.OS
: 0.08
0.05
0.02
0.02
0.01
0.1 S
0.01
0.34
0.08
\ 0.08
0.32
' 0.84
0.53
0.34
0.22
! 0.37
3.28
0.83
4.11
3.27
> » 0.13
; » o.si
NO 0.003
ND 0.001
ND 0.001
ND 0.002
NO 0.002
0.01
F 0.06
NO 0.004
ND 0.001
ND 0.001
ND 0.002
ND 0.005
NO 0.008
ND 0.002
NO 0.01
NO 0.004
F 0.01
F 0.01
0.004
0.01
0.02
0.01
ND 0.04
ND 0.08
ND 0.02
< 0.08
< 0.04
< 0.12
> 0.07
> 0.01
> 0.08
NO 0.04
ND 0.04
ND 0.01
NO 0.02
ND 0.01
ND 0.02
0.14
ND 0.04
ND O.OS
ND 0.04
NO 0.01
ND 0.01
NO 0.02
NO 0.01
ND 0.01
ND 0.01
NO 0.02
ND 0.77
ND 0.57
ND 0.12
ND 0.01
0.03
ND 1.16
NO 020
ND 0.04
< 027
< 021
< 0.49
> 0.14
(id ND
> 0.14
< 0.014
ND 0.016
< 0.005
< 0.013
ND 0.007
< 0.1S8
1.000
< 0.048
< 0.033
< 0.039
< 0.022
< 0.010
<£ 0.015
« 0.009
* 0.053
< 0.006
•e 0.122
< 0.279
< 0.218
< 0.148
< 0.288
0.187
< 0.513
< 0.161
< 0.143
< 1.211
< 0.361
< 1.571
s. 1.16
3. 0.28
> 1.44
A2-6
-------
TABLE A2-1. SS1 - WASTE WATER SUMMARY
(continued)
Substance
Vota
frac
Units
Vinyl chloride .
Methyl chloride
Trans- 1 ,2-dtahloroethene
Cis- 1 ,2-dichloroethene
Chloroform
1.1.1 -Trichloroethane
Carbon tetrachtoride
Benzene
1,2-Dichloroethane
Trichtoroethene
Toluene
1 ,1,2 • Trichloroethane
Tetrachloroethene
1 ,2 - Dibromoethan*
Chtorobenzene
Ethylbenzene
M-/P-Xylene
O-Xytene
1 ,3 - Dtehtorobenzene
1.4-Dichlorobenzene
1 ,2 - Dichkxobenzene
i metals
Arsenic
Barium
Beryllium
Cadmium
Chromium (total)
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Phosphorus
Selenium
Silver
Thallium
Tin
Zinc
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L.
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
UOfte
upyL
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
U9/L
Miscellaneous
Phy«
rotaj organic carbon
Total sulfur (as S)
Organic halogens (as chloride)
Inorganic halogens (as chloride)
Hexavalent chromium
ppmw
wt.%
ppbw
ppmw
ppmw
cat characteristic*
Density
pH
g/cc
-
CONDITION 3 - WASTE OIL
Rag Runl (Flag Run 2
Flag Run 3
NO 2
BQL 3
NO 2
NO 2
BQL 2
NO 2
NO 2
BQL 4
NO 2
NO 2
NO 2
NO 2
BQL 9
NO 2
NO 2
NO 2
NO 2
NO 2
NO 2
NO 2
NO 2
NO 100
150
700
NO 10
NO 10
80
260
460
1700
0.49
79
1800
NO 100
NO 10
NO 100
NO 100
2800
NO 2
NO 2
NO 2
NO 2
NO 2
NO 2
NO 2
10
NO 2
NO 2
BQL 8
NO 2
NO 2
NO 2
NO 2
NO 2
NO 2
NO 2
NO 2
NO 2
NO 2
NO 100
NO 100
420
NO 10
NO 10
10
15
NO 50
86
NO 0.2
NO 10
150
NO 100
NO 10
NO 100
NO 100
210
NO 2
NO 2
NO 2
NO 2
NO 2
NO 2
NO 2
12
NO 2
NO 2
BQL 3
NO 2
NO 2
NO 2
no 2
NO 2
NO 2
NO 2
NO 2
NO 2
NO 2
NO 100
NO 100
470
NO 10
NO 10
NO 10
40
NO 50
110
NO 0.2
NO 10
240
NO 100
NO 10
NO 100
NO 100
310
24.6
31 0.004
30 136
1300
NO 0.01
35.0
31 0.005
30 37.8
1900
NO 0.01
36.3
31 0.006
30 53.6
1900
NO 0.01
0.97
7.6
0.98
7.4
0.99
7.7
Average
NO 2.0
< 2.3
NO 2.0
NO 2.0
< 2.0
NO 2.0
NO 2.0
< 8.7
NO 2.0
NO 2.0
< 4.3
NO 2.0
< 4.3
NO 2.0
NO 2.0
NO 2.0
NO 2.0
NO 2.0
NO 2.0
NO 2.0
NO 2.0
NO 100.0
NO 1 16.7
530.0
NO 10.0
NO 10.0
< 33.3
105
187
< 632
NO 0.30
NO 33.0
730.0
NO 100.0
NO 10.0
NO 100.0
NO 100.0
1107
31.97
0.0051
75.80
1700
NO 0.01 C
0.98
7.57
A2-7
-------
TABLE A2-2. SS2 - WASTE OIL SUMMARY
Substance
Po
Ch
Total stream flow rate - Run 1
Total stream flow rate • Run 2
Total stream flow rate • Run 3
Average
Units
kg/hr
188000
aH NOs
NO 10000
NO 10000
BQL 40000
60000
BQL 20000
NO 10000
BQL 95000
125000
NO 10000
NO 20000
NO 30000
NO 10000
NO 10000
NO 10000
NO 10000
MO 10000
NO 10000
NO 10000
NO 10000
NO 60000
NO 10000
MO 10000
' NO 10000
NO 10000
NO 10000
NO 50000
NO 20000
NO 10000
NO 30000
NO 10000
NO 235000
NO 150000
> 155000
ati NOs
A2-8
-------
TABLE A2-2. SS2 - WASTE OIL SUMMARY
(continued)
Substance
— — _
Units
CONDITION 1
WASTE WATER
Flag
ilycyellc aromatic hydrocarbon* (PAH)
Naphthalene
2-Methylnaphthalene
2-CI-Naphthalene
Acenaphthylene
Acenapthene
Fluorene
Phenanthrene
Anthracana
Fluoranthene
Pyrene
Banzo (a) anthracene
Chrysene
Banzo (b) fluoranthene
Banzo (k) nuoranthane
Banzo (a) pyrane
Banzo (a) pyrane
Parylana
ndono (1,2,3-od) pyrene
Dibenz (a,h) anthracene
Banzo (g.h.i) perylene
Total PAHs including NOs
Total PAHs excluding NOt
OloxJn* and furana
,
2378 TCOD
12378 PaCOO
123478 HxCDD
123678 HXCOO
123789 HxCDD
1234678 HpCDD
OCDD
2378 TCOF
12378PaCOF
23478 PeCOF
123478 HxCOF
123678 HXCOF
234678 HxCOF
123789 HxCOF
1 234678 HpCDF
1 234789 HpCOF
OCOF
TCOD (total)
PaCOO (total)
HxCOO (total)
HpCDO (total)
TCOF (total)
P«CDF(totaO
HxCDF (total)
HpCOF (total)
Total doxna (by iaomer) inducing NOa
Total furana (by isomer) inducing NOa
Total doxWfurans (by isomer) In NOa
Total doxins (by isomer) exdudng NDs
Total furans (by isomer) exdudng NOs
Total doxin/furans (by isomer) ax NOs
ng/kg
(Jig/kg
ngftg
ng/kg
ngfcg
Hg/kg
Hg/kg
ng/kg
ng/kg
ngfcg
ngfcg
ng/kg
^g/kg
M-S^g
(ig^g
Hg/kg
H9^g
Hg/kg
^g/kg
i1?^
MS'kg
noykg
BQL 58000
95000
NO 9300
NO 9300
NO 9300
NO 9300
NO 9300
NO 9300
NO 9300
NO 9300
NO , 9300
NO 9300
NO 9300
NO 9300
NO 9300
NO 9300
NO 9300
NO 9300
NO 9300
NO 9300
< 320000
> 153000
ng/kg
ng/kg
ngrtcg
ng/kg
ng/kg
ng/kg
ng/kg
ng/kg
ng/kg
ng/kg
ng/kg
ng/kg
ng/kg
ng/kg
ng/kg
ng/kg
ng/kg
ng/kg
ng/kg
ng/kg
ng/kg
ng/kg
ng/kg
ng/kg
ng/kg
ng/kg
ng/kg
ng/kg
ng/kg
ng/kg
ng/kg
NO 170
NO 1700
NO 290
NO 630
NO 170
2200
14000
31000
16000
88000
58000
16000
6800
17000
18000
14000
43000
190
NO 23800
NO 3630
3900
910000
570000
200000
57000
< 19000
308000
< 327000
> 16200
ail detected
> 32400
CONDITION 3
WASTE OIL
Flag
.
SQL 56000
SQL 88000
NO 10000
NO 10000
BQL 52000
NO 10000
NO 10000
NO 10000
NO 10000
NO 10000
NO 10000
NO 10000
NO 10000
NO 10000
NO 10000
NO 10000
NO 10000
NO .10000
NO 10000
NO 10000
< 366000
> 196000
NO 98
NO 68
NO 190
210
NO 100
1900
13000
33000
16000
150000
49000
15000
18000
21000
18000
13000
44000
160
NO 952
210
3600
1100000
620000
200000
57000
< 16000
377000
< 393000
> 15100
al detected
> 392100
A2-9
-------
TABLE A2-2. SS2 - WASTE OIL SUMMARY
(continued)
Substance
Units
|
Volatile organic compounds
Tn
Vinyl chloride
Methyl chloride
Trans- 1 .2-dchloroethene
Cls-l.2-dichloroethene
Chloroform
1.1,1 - Trichtoroethane
Carbon tetrachtoride
Benzene
1.2-Dichloroethane
Trtchloroethene
Toluene
1.1,2-Trichkxoethane
Tetrachloroethene
1 2. • Dlbromoethane
Chtorobenzene
Ethylbenzene
M-/P-Xylene
O-Xylene
1 ,3 • Dfchlorobenzene
1 .4 • Dlchlorobenzene
1 ,2 • Dlchlorobenzene
g/L
g/L
g/L
g/L
S>L
gVU
SA.
go.
SA
&-
gfl-
g/L
g^.
9^.
oA
gA.
gfl.
grt,
SA.
8^-
grt.
CONDITION 1
WASTE WATER
Flag
CONDITION 3
WASTE OIL
Flag
NO 2
33
NO 2
ND 20
NO 2
NO 2
NO 2
SQL 3
ND 2
180
15
ND 2
ND 2
ND 2
NO 2
SQL 5
16
SQL S
NO • 2
NO 2
NO 2
tee metata
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Beryllium
Cadmium
Chromium (Total)
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Phosphorus
Selenium
Silver
Thallium
Tin
Zinc
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
rngdcg
mg/kg
mg/kg
NO 10
NO 10
8
NO 1
NO 1
16
S
110
ND 1
NO 0.10
3.SO
270
NO 10
NO 1
NO 10
ND 10
88
NO 2
30
ND 2
ND 19
ND 2
ND 2
ND 2
ND 2
NO 2
200
SQL 7
NO 2
NO 2
NO 2
ND 2
SOL 3
11
BQL .3
ND 2
ND 2
NO 2
NO 10
NO 10
6
NO 1
'
15
(
120
NO 1
0.26
4.30
280
NO 10
ND 1
NO 10
11
100
Ultimate analyate :
Carbon
Hydrogen
Nitrogen
Total suHur (a* S)
Oxygen
wt %
wt%
Wt%
wt%
wt%
62.1
32 7.78
0.04
31 0.58
19.1
2.0
32 7.89
0.05
31 0.67
7.77
Mtacellaneoue
Heating value
Hexavmlent chromium
Chlorine
Fluorine
Phosphate
Ash
Total halogens (as chloride)
Btu/lb
ppmw
wt%
wt%
wt%
wt%
wt%
13500
0.01
10.5
< 0.01
< 0.01
NO 0.01
10.5
16700
NO 0.01
21.7
•c 0.01
< . 0.01
0.41
21.7
A2-10
-------
TABLE A2-3. SS3 - CONTAMINATED SOIL SUMMARY
Substance
Total stream flow rate
Po
Ch
Units
kg/hr
Ib/hr
CONDITIOr
Flag Run 1
127
280
lycnionnaiea oipnenyis (PCS) ' '""
Monochlorobiphenyt (total)
Dichlorobiphenyl (total)
Trichlorobiphenyl (total)
Tetrachlorobiphenyl (total)
Pentachlorobiphenyl (total)
Hexachlorobiphenyl (total)
Heptacrtlorobiphenyl (total)
Octachlorobiphenyl (total)
Nonachlorobiphenyl (total)
Decachlorobiphenvl (total)
Total PCBs (tri-deca) including NDs
Total PCBs (mono-deca) including NDs
Total PCBs (tri-deca) excluding NDs
Total PCBs (mono-deca) excluding NDs
ngfcg
ng*g
Mg*g
Kg/kg
ngfcg
tig/kg
ng*g
ngfcg
ngfcg
ng/kg
ng/kg
ngfcg
ng/kg
ngfcg
50 SQL 520
50 25000
50 140000
50 220000
50 93000
50 BQL 8900
50 BQL 1 100
SO • ND 36000
50 ND 8900
50 ND 4900
50 < 513000
50 < 538000
50 > 463000
50 > 488500
lorobanzene* and chlorophenola — '
1 ,3-Dichlorobenzene
1 .4-DichIorobenzene
Total dichlorobenzenes
1.3,5-Trichlorobenzene
1 ,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
Total trichlorobenzenes
1 ,2,3,4°Tetracrilorobenzene
1 .2.3.5- and/or 1 ,2,4,5-Tatraohloro- benzene
Total tetrachlorobenzenes
Pentachlorobenzene
Hexachlorobenzene
2.3-Dichlorophenol
2,4-DicJilorophenol
2,5-Dichlorophenol
2,6-Dichlorophenol
3,4-Dichlorophenol
3,5-Dichlorophanol
Total dichtorophenols
2,3,5-Trichlorophenol
2,3,6-Trichlorophenol
2.4,5-Trichlorophenol
2,4.6-Trichlorophenol
Total trichlorophenols
2,3,4,5- and/or 2,3,4,6-Tetrachtorophenoi
2,3,5,6-Tetrachlorophenol
Total tetrachlorophenols
Pentachtorophenol .
rotal CB including NDs
fotal CP including NDs
rotal CB excluding NDs
rotal CP excluding NDs
ngfcg
Kg/kg
ngfcg
ng/kg
ngfcg
jtg^g
ng*g
ug/kg
^g'ltg*g
ng^g
ns*g
ng^g
us/kg
Mg/kg
tig^kg
ng^cg
ng^g
ngfcg
Hgflcg
ng'kg
tig/kg
Mg/kg
jigfcg
ttg^kg
ND 990
ND 990
ND 990
ND 2970
ND 990
ND 990
ND 990
ND 2970
ND 990
ND 2000
ND 2990
ND 990
6300
ND 990
ND 990
ND 990
ND 990
ND 990
ND ' 990
ND 5940
ND 990
ND 990
ND 990
ND 990
ND 990
NO 4950
ND 2000
ND 990
NO 2990
ND 990
< 16200
ND 14900
> 6300
alT ND
^ 2- SOIL
23.7
52.3
50 BQL 755
50 33000
50 200000
50 315000
50 141000
50 BQL 13800
50 BQL 2400
50 BQL 640
50 BQL 4760
50 ND 4850
50 < 682000
50 < 716000
50 > . . 677000
50 > 711000
ND 890
ND 890
ND 0890
ND 2670
ND 890
ND 890
ND 890
NO . 2670
ND 890
ND 1800
ND 2690
ND 890
13000
ND 890
ND 890
ND 890
ND 890
ND 890
ND 890
ND 5340
ND 890
ND 890
ND 890
ND 890
ND 890
ND 4450
ND 1800
ND 890
ND 2690
ND 890
< 21900
ND 13400
> 13000
all ND
A2-11
-------
TABLE A2-3. SS3
CONTAMINATED SOIL SUMMARY
(continued)
Substance
Poi
Units
CONDITION 2 • SOIL
Flag Runt Flag Run 2
ycycllc aromatic hydrocarbons (PAH) ;
Naphthalene
2-Mothylnaphthalene
2-CI-Naphthalene
Acenapnthylene
Acenapthene
Ruorene
Phon an throne
Anthracene
Fluoranthene
Pyrene
Benzo (a) anthracene
Chrysene
Bonzo (b) fluoranthene
Benzo (k) fluoranthene
Bonzo (e) pyrene
Benzo (a) pyrene
Peryiene
Indeno (1.2,3-cd) pyrene
Dibenz (a,h) anthracene
Benzo (g.h.i) peryiene
Total PAHs including NDs
Total PAHs excluding NDs
ug/kg.
Ug/kg
ug/kg
U9/ko
us/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
jig/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ugfcg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ugfcg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
52 BQL 1800
52 BQL 1000
52 ND 990
52 ND 990
52 NO 990
52 ND 990
52 BQL 2900
52 ND 990
52 BQL 2400
52 BQL 1900
52 ND 990
52 NO 990
52 ND 990
52 NO 990
52 ND 990
52 ND 990
52 ND 990
52 ND 990
52 ND 990
52 NO 990
52 < 24900
52 > 10000
47.52 ND 890
47,52 ND 890
47.52 NO 890
47.52 ND 890
47.52 ND 890
47,52 ND 890
47,52 ND 890
47,52 ND 890
47.52 ND 890
47.52 ND 890
47,52 ND 890
47,52 ND 890
47,52 ND 890
47,52 ND 890
47,52 ND 890
47,52 ND 890
47,52 ND 890
47.52 NO 890
47,52 NO 890
47.52 ND 890
47.S2 ND 17800
47.52 all ND
Dioxins and furans
2378 TCDD
12378 PeCDD
123478 HxCDD
123678 HxCDO
123789 HxCDD
1234678 HpCDD
OCDD
2378 TCDF
12378 PoCDF
23478 PeCDF
123478 HxCDF
123678 HXCDF
234678 HxCDF
123789 HxCDF
1234678 HpCDF
1234789 HpCDF
OCDF
TCDD (total)
PeCDD (total)
HxCDD (total)
HoCDD (total)
TCDF (total)
PeCDF (total)
HxCDF (total)
HpCDF (total)
Total dioxins (by isomer) including NDs
Total furans (by isomer) including NDs
Total doxin/furans (by isomer) in NDs
Total dioxins (by isomer) excluding NDs
Total furans (by isomer) excluding NDs
Total dioxin/furans (by isomer) ex NDs
ng/kg
ng/kg
hg/kg
ng/kg
ng/kg
ng/kg
ng/kg
ng/kg
ng/kg
ng/kg
ng/kg
ng/kg
ng/kg
ng/kg
ng/kg
hg/kg
hg/kg
ng/kg
ng/kg
hg/kg
no/kg
hg/kg
hg/kg
ng/kg
ng/kg
ng/kg
ng/kg
ng/kg
ng/kg
hg/kg
ng/ka
ND 8.40
ND 13.0
ND 13.0
18.0
ND 31.0
540
6200
350
190
840
480
160
§9.0
ND 29.0
280
110
760
23
ND 182
150
1100
6000
4900
1700
770
< 6800
< 3260
< 10100
> 6758
> 3229
> 9987
ND 6.40
ND 62.0
4.5
11.0
7.60
180
2000
240
100
380
260
81.0
3S.O
NO 54.0
130
66
470
19
ND 868
73
350
6100
2800
890
370
< " 2270
< 1 820
< 4100
> 2203
> 1762
> 3965
A2-12
-------
TABLE A2-3. SS3 - CONTAMINATED SOIL SUMMARY
(continued)
Substance
Vc
fn
Ml*
•
laaia organic compounds
Vinyl chloride
Methyl chloride
Trans- 1,2-dchloc oo thane
Cis-1 ,2-dichloroethene
Chloroform •
1.1.1-Trichloroethane
Carbon tetrachloride
Benzene
1 ,2 - Dichloroethane
Trichloroethene
Toluene
1.1,2-Trichloroethane
Tetrachloroethene
1 ,2 - Dibromoettiane
Chlorobenzene
Ethylbenzene
M-/P-Xylene
O-Xylene
1 ,3 - Dichlorobenzene
1 ,4 - Dichlorobenzene
1 ,2 - Oichlorobenzene
Units
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
tig/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
CONDITION 2 - SOIL
Flag Run 1
51 ALR 4900
51 ALR 16000
51 ND 30
•51 ALR 31000
51 NO 30
51 NO 30
51 NO 30
51 SQL 42
51 ND 30
51 ALR 98000
51 ALR 9100
51 ND 30
51 NO 30
51 NO 30
51 SQL 46
51 ALR 5100
51 ALR 6800
51 ALR 4SOO
51 ND 30
51 SQL 93
51 ND 30
c« meUls ' ~ : '. —
Antimony " ' : '
Arsenic .
Barium
Beryllium
Cadmium
Chromium (total)
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Phosphorus
Selenium
Silver
Thallium
Tin
Zinc
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
ND 7.40
27.0
110
0.45
2.1
75
99
270
410
0.26
65
630
ND 7.4
ND 0.74
13
95
360
ceilanaous : ~~~ •
Moisture ~~~~
Total organic carbon
Total sulfur (as S)
Organic halogens (as chloride)
Total halogens (as chloride)
\sh
Hexavalent chromium
wt%
ppmw
wt%
ppbw
wt%
wt%
ppmw
33
19500
NA
392
3.5,30 0.04
62.4
NO 0.01
Flag Run 2
51 ALR 2700
51 ALR 12000
51 BQL , 27
51 ALR 18000
51 ND 28
51 NO 28
51 NO 28
51 ND 28
51 NO 28
51 ALR 62000
51 ALR 5900
51 ND 28
51 ND 28
51 ND 28
51 NO 28
51 2400
51 ALR 3900
51 ND 28
51 NO 28
51 ND 28
51 ND 28
ND 7.40
13.0
50.0
0.27
ND 0.74
15
30
72
250
ND 0.15
20
340
ND 7.4
ND 0.74
ND 7.4
34
490
27
18100
< 0.01
NA
5,30 0.34
55
NO 0.01
A2-13
-------
TABLE A2-3. SS3 - CONTAMINATED SOIL SUMMARY
(continued)
Substance
.
Units
CONDITION 2 -SOIL
Flag Run" 1
Flag Run 2
TCLP volatile*
Vinyl chloride
Methyl chloride
Trans- 1 ,2-dtehloroethene
CIs-1 .2-dchloroothano
Chtoroform
1.1.1 - Trichtoroethane
Carbon tetrachloride
Benzene
1.2-Dtehtoroethane
Trichtoroethene
Toluena
1,1,2- Trichtoroatfiano
Tetrachloroethene
1,2-D!bromoethane
Chtorobenzene
Ethylbenzene
M-/P-Xylene
O-Xyteno
1 .3 - Dldilorobenzena
1 ,4 - 0!dik3rob«nzena
1 .2 - Dtahtorobenzene
ng/L
Vgfl-
lU-g/L
u.g/L
u.g/L
v-gfl-
PSH-
»gn-
ngn.
ng/L
ijigA.
ijig/L
ng^-
ugA.
,H9/L
>^L
:>igA.
»gfL
ng^-
ingA-
U9/L
3 350
3 ALR 2200
3 ND 10
3 770
3 ND 10
3 SQL 12
3 NO 10
3 NO 10
3 NO 10
3 ALR 2400
3 230
3 ND 10
3 NO 10
3 NO 10
3 ND 10
3 100
3 200
3 100
3 NO 10
3 NO 10
3 ND 10
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
TCLP trace motaJs -
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Lead
Mercury
Selenium
Silver
Hg^g
\igkg
^9^9
Msfcg
(tg/kg
Hg*g
fig/kg
Ug/kg
3 ND 100
3 1800
3 ND 10
3 NO 10
3 ND 50
3 NO 0.4
3 NO 100
3 ND 10
ND 100
1500
ND 10
11
ND 50
ND 0.4
ND 100
ND 10
A2-14
-------
TABLE A2-4. SS4 - SCRUBBER CAUSTIC SUMMARY
Substance
<
1
Phy»l
F
conditon 1- Run 1
Condition i- Run 2
Condtkxi 1- Run 3
Average
Condition 2 r Run 1
Condition 2 - Run 2
Average
uonamon 3 - Run 1
Sondition 3 - Run 2
Condtton 3 - Run 3
Average
Antimony ' '
Arsenic
Barium
Beryllium
Cadmium
Chromium (total)
Copper
ead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
'hosphorus
Selenium
Silver
"hallium
Tin
Zinc
Total sulfur (as S) "~ T
^xavalent chromium
Drganic halogens (as chloride)
norganic halogens (as chloride)
iH
. Units
kg/hr
kg/hr
kg/hr
kg/hr
kg/hr
kg/hr
kg/hr
kg/hr
kg/hr
kg/hr
kg/hr
ng/L
Hg/L
ng/L
ng/L
UQ/L
MQ^le
M
llrt/1
Hg/L
Hgrt-
Hgrt-
jxg/L
S
wt %
ppmw
ppbw
ppmw
*?*
. Rag Composite
14.2
14.0
24.7
17.6
38.5
23.8
na
83.0
161
106
116.7
ND 100
ND 100
ND 10
ND 10
ND 10
13
SVt
NO sn
16
ND 0.2
43
ND 100
ND 100
ND 10
ND 100
ND 100
460
0.002
NO 0.01
3 959
1.05
13.6
A2-15
-------
TABLE A2-5. SS5 - SCRUBBER MAKE-UP WATER SUMMARY
nditionS
Waste ojl_
Run 1
Condition 1
Waste water
RurTHF
ToUl ttreem flow rate
Run1
Run 2
Run 3
Avera
race metali
kntimony
Ars«nic
Barium
Beryllium
Cadmium
Chromium (total)
Copper
.oad
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Phosphorus
Selenium'
Silver
Thallium
Tin
Zinc
c*4laneou*.
otal sulfur (as S)
Hexavaient chromium
Organic halogens (as chloride)
e halogens (as chloride
Ml chy acter&gci
Density
H
0.0008
NO 0.01
44
33
0.0003
NO 0.01
3 102
47
Wt%
ppmw
ppbw
A2-16
-------
TABLE A2-6. SS6 - PROPANE SUMMARY
Substance
Total
Polyc
Chloi
Veto
stream flow rat*
Conditon 1- Run 1
Condition 1- Run 2
Condtton 1- Run 3
Average
Condition 2 • Run 1
Condition 2 - Run 2
Condition 3 - Run 1
Condition 3 - Run 2
Condtion 3 • Run 3
Average
Units
kg/hr
kg/hr
kg/hr
kg/hr
kg/hr
kg/hr
kg/hr
kgmr
kg/hr
kg/hr
Flag Composite
6.71
7.62
8.53
7.62
9.53
13.8
17.3
9.89
11.7
12.9
shlorinated blphenyls (PCS)
Monochtorobiphenyi (total)
Dichlorobiprienyl (total)
Trichlorobiph«nyl (total)
Tetrachlorobiphenyl (total)
Pantachlorobiphenyl (total)
Hexachlorobiphenyl (total)
Heptachlorobiphenyl (total)
Octachlorobiphanyt (total)
Nonachlorobipheriyl (total)
Decachtorobiphenyl (total)
Total PCBs (Tri-Deca) including ND«
Total PCBs (Mono-Oeca) ind. NOs
Total PCBs (Tri-Deca) excluding ND»
Total PCBs (Mono-Oeca) axel. NOs
^g/dscm
ng/dscm
ng/dscm
ug/dscm
u.g/dscm
u,g/dscm
H9/dscm
(ig/dsctn
u.g/dscm
u.g/dscni
^g/dscm
(ig/dsem
u.g/d«cm
ng/dscm
NO 0.01
0.02
0.13
0.04
NO 0.02
NO 0.02
NO 0.02
EMPC 1.12
NO 0.02
NO 0.07
< 1.44
< 1.47
> 0.19
> 0.17
robenzenee and chtorophenoi*
1 ,2 Dichlorobenzene
1,3 • Oichlorobenzene
1,4 - Dfchkxobenzene
1 ,2,3 • Trichkxobenzene
1 42,4 - Trichlorobenzefle
1 ,3,5 - Trichlorobenzene
1.2,3,4-Telrachlorobenzene
1 ,2,4,5 - Tetrachkxobenzene
t ,2.3,5 - Tetrachlorobenzene
Pentachlorobenzen*
Hexachlorobenzene
2 - chlorophenot
3,4 - Chterophenot
2,3 • Dtahkxophenol
2.4 • Dichlofopheool
3,4 • Dichkxophenol
3.5 - Dtehkxopheool
2,S-Dichkxophe«ol
2.6 - Dfchkxophenol
2,3,4 - Trichtorophenol
2,3,5 -Trichkxophenol
2,3,6- Trichkxoprienol
2,4,5 - Trichkxophenol
2.4,6 • Trichkxophenol
2,3,4,5 • Tetrachkxophenol
2.3,5,6 - Tetmchkxophenoi
Pentechkxophenol
Total chlorobenzenes
Total cholorophenols
H9/d»cm
Ug/dscm
p.g/d«cm
ug/dscm
jig/d*cm
(ig/d*cm
^g/dscm
ug/dscm
Hg/d»cm
ug/dscm
u.g/dscm
jig/dscm
M.g/dscm
|ig/dscm
ug/ascm
ug/dscm
^g/dscm
(ig/dscm
ug/dscm
u.g/dscm
ng/dacm
ng/dscm
p.g/dscm
ug/d»cm
ug/dscm
ncydscm
ug/dscm
u.g/dscm
ngCdtcm
NO 0.72
NO 0.68
NO 0.70
NO 0.74
NO 0.68
NO 0.70
NO 0.69
NO 0.47
NO 0.50
NO 0.53
NO 0.42
NO 0.72
NO 0.35
NO 1.01
NO 0.78
NO 0.88
NO 0.84
NO 0.80
NO 0.77
NO 1.13
NO lilO
NO 1.07
NO 1.05
NO 1.09
NO 0.85
NO 0.88
NO 0.90
NO 6.82
NO 142
II* organic compounds
Vinyl chloride
Methyl chloride
Trans- 1 ,2-dtehloroethene
Cis-1 ,2-dJchkxoethene
ugA.
»ig/L
WL
U9A.
NO 0.8
NO 0.8
NO 0.8
NO 0.8
A2-17
-------
TABLE A2-6. SS6 - PROPANE SUMMARY
(continued)
Substance .; „_
sum
M!«e
Chloroform :
,1,1 -Trichloroethane
Carbon tetrachloride
ienzene ;
1 .2 - Dtehtoroethane
Trichtoroethene
Toluene
1 .1 .2 - Trichloroethane
Tetrachloroethene
1 ,2 • Dibromoethane
Chlorobenzene
Ethylbenzene
M-/P-Xylene
O-Xylene
1.3-Dtehtorobenzene
1.4-Dfchtorobenzene :
1.2-Dtohtorobenzene
T compound*
Hydrogen sulfide {
Carbonyl sulflde
Methyl mercaptan
Ethyl mercaptan
Dimethyl sulflde
Carbon sulflde
N-Propylmercaptan
Dimethy djsuHlde ,
Heating value
Density (assumed) , _
Units
ng/L
ug/L
^ZfL
n
^/i
^o/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
^nrt"
a/L
^ fl
ugfl.
ppbv
ppbv
ppbv
ppbv
ppbv
ppbv
I Btu/lb
lag Compositel
isin 0 81
wn 0 81
NO 6.5
wn Q 8
ND 0.81
ND 13|
ND 0.8
ND 0.8l
NO 0.8
ND 0.8
BQL 2.1
6.7
BQL 2.61
NO 0.81
ND 0.8
ND 0.81
8280
2760
4130
ND 400
NO 400
ND 400
ND 200
1.76
A2-18
-------
A2-7. SS7 - HYDROGEN - SUMMARY TABLE
Substance
Polychlorlnated biphenyls (PCBs)
Monochlorobiphenyl (total)
Oichlorobiphenyl (total)
Triehlorobiphenyl (total)
Tetrachlorobiphenyl (total)
Pentachlorobiphenyl (total)
Hexachlorobiphenyl (total)
Heptachlorobiphenyl (total)
Octachlorobiphenyl (total)
Nonachlorobiphenyl (total)
Dacachlorobiphenyl (total)
Total PCBs (Tri-Deca)
Total PCBs (Mono-Deca)
Units
Hg/dscm
Hg/dscm
ng/dscm
ng/dsem
m/dscm
fig/dsem
ng/dscm
ng/dscm
ng/dscm
(ig/dscm
H9/dscm
ng/dscm
PROGRAM COMPOSITE
Flag C1.C2.C3
NO 0.0002
0.01
0.03
0.01
EMPC 0.02
ND 0.01
NO 0.01
ND 0.01
.NO 0.01
ND 0.02
NO 0.10
ND 0.11
Chlorobenzenes and chlorophenol*
1 ,2 Dichlorobenzena
1 ,2,3,4-Tetrachlorobenzene
1 ,2,3,5 • Tetrachlorobenzena
1 ,2,3 - Trichlorobenzene
1 ,2,4,5 - Tetrachlorobenzene
1 ,2,4 - Trichlorobenzene
1 ,3 - Dichlorobenzene
1 ,3,5 • Trichlorobenzena
1 ,4 • Dichlorobenzeno
2,3 - Dichlorophenol
2,3,4 - Trichlorophenol
2,3,4,5 - Tetrachlorophenol
2,3,5 - Trichlorophenol
2,3,5,6 - Tetrachlorophenol
2,3,6 - Trichlorophenol
2,4 - Dichlorophenol
2,4,5 - Trichlorophenol
2,4,6 • Trichlorophenol
2,5 • Dichlorophenol
2,6 - Dichlorophenol
2 - Chlorophenol
3,4 - Dichlorophenol
3,5 - Dichlorophenol
3,4 • Chlorophenol
Hexachlorobenzene
Pentachlorobenzene
3entachlorophenol
Total chlorobenzes
Total chlorophenols
(tg/dscm
lig/dscm
Hg/dscm
(ig/dscm
ng/dacm
ng/dscm
H9/dscm
jig/dscm
(ig/dscm
(ig/dscm
ng/dsem
jig/dscm
m/dscm
ng/dscm
(ig/dscm
(tg/dscm
fig/dscm
tig/dscm
ng/dscm
^g/dscm
(tg/dscm
ng/dscm
(ig/dscm
ng/dscm
Hg/dscm
ng/dscm
ng/dscm
ng/dscm
ixg/dscm
ND 4.03
ND 3.01
ND 3.05
NO 4.S1
ND 2-85
ND 4.18
ND 3.83
ND 4.26
ND 3.02
. ND 6.'J8
ND 4.Q2
ND 3.70
ND 4.80
ND 3.(33
ND 4.66
ND 4.79
ND 4.57
ND 4.76
ND 4.SJO
ND 4.73
ND 4.06
ND 3.81
ND 3.65
NO 1.97
ND 1.98
ND 2.29
ND 4.25
ND 37.9
ND 69.6
A2-19
-------
A2-7. SS7 - HYDROGEN • SUMMARY TABLE
Substance
i Units
PROGRAM COMPOSITE
Flag C1.C2.C3
VolatllB Organic Compound*
•
Vinyl chloride
Methyl chloride
Trans-1 ,2-dfchloroethene
Cis-1 ,2-dichloroethene
Chloroform
1,1,1 - Trichloroethane
Carbon tetrachloride
Benzene
1,2-DichIoroethane
Trichloroethene
Toluene
1 ,1,2 - Trichloroethane
Tetrachloroethene
1,2-Dibromoethane
Chlorobenzene
Ethylbenzene
M-/P-Xy!ene
O-Xylene
1 ,3 - Oichlorobenzene
1 ,4 - Dichlorobenzene
1 ,2 - Dichlorobenzene
ng/L
; H9/L
ng/L
H9/L
Hg/L
I V-&-
: ng"-
: ng/L
H9/L
, "tig/L1
• H9/L
H9/L
jig/L
»tg/L
tig/L
: ng/L
jigA.
: (ig/L
ng/L
' Jig/L
ng/L
NO 554
< 1930
ND 554
NO 554
ND 554
ND 554
ND 554
BQL 1040
ND 554
ND 554
10700
ND 554
ND 554
ND 554
ND 554
ND SS4
ND • 1110
ND 554
ND SS4
ND 554
ND 554
A2-20
-------
TABLE A2-8. SS9 - COMBUSTION AIR SUMMARY
Substance
cTT
'
•
Runi ; ~ ~~^
Run 2
Run 3
Average
Run 1
Run 2
Run 3
Avwaga
Units
kgrtv .
kg/hr
kpyhr
kgrtv
dscnVhr
dscm/hr
dscm/hr
Condition 1
Wasta watar
Rag
236
222
219
225
196
185
182
188
Condition 2
Soil
Jpteg Run 1| Flag Run 2
259
_
216
V)
ychlorlnaUd blpftonyls (PCS) ; '
Monochlorobiphanyl (total)
Oichlorobiphenyt (total)
Trichtorobipfwnyl (total)
Tetrachlofobiphanyl (total)
S8ntachkxobiph*nyl (total)
-lexaehlorobiphany) (total)
Heptachlorobiph«nyl (total)
Octachtorobiphanyi (total)
Yonachlorobiphenyl (total)
Decachlorobiphsnyl (total)
Total PCBa (Tri-0«ca) including NOs
Total PCBs (Mono-0«ca) including NOs
Total PC88 (Tri-D«ca) oxcludlng NOs
Total PCBs (Mono-Oeca) axcluding NDa
H9/dscm
ug/dscm
^g/dscm
ug/dscm
ug/dscm
|io/dscm
ug/dscm
ug/dscm
^g/dscm
jig/dscm
uo/dscm
ug/dscm
ug/dscm
lig/dscm
NO 0.001
EMPC 0.03
NO 0.001
NO 0.001
B 0.01
NO 0.002
NO 0.002
NO 0.002
NO 0.002
NO 0.01
NO 0.03
NO 0.06
all NO
all NO
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
orob«nzwt«M and chlofoph*nois ." ~ *
1 ,2 DicnloroDanzene ' '. ' I
1.3 • Dfehtorobsnzona
1 ,4 * Dtchkxobwizana
1 ,2.3 - Trichforob«nz«n«
1,2,4 - Trichlorob«nzano
1 .3,5 - Trichlorob*nz«n«
1 ,2.3.4-T«trachlorob«nz*n«
1.2,3,5 - T«trachlorobanz»rM
1 ,2,4,5 - Tetrachtorobanzena
Pantachlorotwnzen*
Hsxachlofob«nz«n«
2 - Chloroplwnol
3,4 - Chlorophenol
2,3 - Dfchfcxopnanol
2,4 - Oichlorophonol
3.4 - Dichloropnsnol
3,5 - Dichlorophanol
2,5 • Dichloroph0not
2,8 - Dichlorophanol
2,3.4 - Trichkxophanol
2,3,6 - Trichtoroptwnol
2.4,5 • Trichkxophanol
2,4.8 - TrichteropJwwl
2.3.5 - Trichkxophwwl
2.3,4,5 - Tetrachkxophenol
3.3,5.6 - Tatrachtorophenol
Pentachlorophcnol
"otaJ chlorotonzanos Ind. NOs
rotal chlorophonols ind. NOs
)ig/dscm
ug/dscm
ug/dscm
ug/dscm
ug/dscm
ug/dscm
Hudson
ug/dscm
ug/dscm
|ig/dscm
jig/dscm
ixg/dscm
ug/dscm
^g/dscm
(ig/dscm
ug/dscm
ug/dscm
ug/dscm
ug^scm
^g/dscm
ug/dscm
ug/dscm
ug/dscm
ug/dscm
ng/dscm
u,g/dscm
ug/dscm
ug/dscm
ug/dscm
NO 2.59
NO 2.35
NO 2.30
NO 2.23
NO 2.34
NO 2.30
NO 1.58
N/A
NO 1.81
NO 1.52
NO 2.14
NO 2.89
NO 2.17
NO 2.92
NO 2.85
NO 2.17
NO 1.87
NO 3.01
NO 2.51
NO 2.55
NO 2.58
NO 2.48
NO 2.67
NO 2.74
NO 2.67
NO 2.89
NO 4.12
NO 21.2
NO 43.1
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA ,
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
JI71
•
309
•
0.01
0.10
o m
W.w 1
0.49
0.08
NO 0.005
NO 0.005
NO 0.005
NO 0.003
NO 0.02
< 1.11
< 1.23
> 1.08
> 1.19
NO 0.12
NO 0,12
NO 0.12
NO 0.15
NO 0.15
NO 0.14
NO o!l4
NO 0.12
NO 0.16
EMPC 0.32
EMPC 0.66
NO 0.13
NO 0.06
NO 0.18
NO 0.14
NO 0.13
NO 0.13
NO 0.15
NO 0.14
NO 0.22
NO 0.21
NO 0.19
NO 0.20
NO 0.26
NO 0.17
NO 0.18
NO 0.29
< 2.19
< 2.78
A2-21
-------
TABLE A2-8. SS9 - COMBUSTION AIR SUMMARY
(continued)
Substance
Vol
su
Hsi
inla organic compouna*
Vinyl chtorida
Methyl chloride
Trans-1 ,2-dtehloroathane
Cl9-1.2-
-------
TABLE A2-3. SS9
• COMBUSTION AIR SUMMARY
(continued)
Substance
To
Ho
Ch
Units
Conditions
Waste oil
Flag
tal stream flow rat*
Run 1
Run 2
Run 3
Average
Run1
Run 2
Run 3
Average
kg/hr
kg/hr
kg/hr
kg/hr
dscm/hr
dsem/hr
dscm/hr
dscm/hr
432
270
294
332
360
225
245
278
lyehlorinated blpnenyls (PCS)
Monochlorobiphenyl (total)
Dfchlorobiphenyl (total)
Trichlorobjphenyl (total)
Tetrachlorobiphenyl (total)
Pentachkxobiphenyl (total)
Hexachlorobipnenyl (total)
Heptachlorobiphenyl (total)
Octachtorobiphenyl (total)
Nonachlorobiphenyl (total)
Oecachlorobiphenyt (total)
Total PCBs (Tri-Oeca) including NOt
Total PCBs (Mono-Dec*) including NDs
Total PCBs (Tri-Oeca) excluding NO*
Total PCBs (Mono-Oeca) excluding NOs
ng/dscm
H9/dscm
Hg/dacm
(ig/dscm
lig/dscm
tig/dscm
ng/dacm
ng/dscm
llg/dscm
^g/dscm
ng/dscm
(ig/dscm
^g/dscm
(ig/dscm
orobenzenee and chtorophenote
1 ,2 Dichlorobenzene
1 .3 • Dichlorobenzene
1 .4 - Dichlorobenzene
1 ,2,3 - Trichlorobenzene
1 ,2,4 • Trichlorobenzene
1 ,3,5 - Trichlorobenzene
1 ,2,3,4-Tetrachlorobenzene
1 ,2,3,5 - Tetrachkxobenzene
1 ,2,4,5 • Tetrachlorobenzene
Pentachkxobenzene
Hexaehlorobenzene
2 - Chlorophenoi
3,4 • ChtorophenoJ
2,3 • Dichlorophenol
2,4 - Dichlorophenol
3,4 - Dichlorophenol
3,5 - Dichlorophenol
2,5 - Oichkxophenol
2,6 - Dichlorophenol
2.3,4 - Trichkxophenol
2,3,6 - Trichkxophenol
2,4,5 • Trichkxophenol
2.4.6 • Trichkxophenol
2,3.5 -Trichkxophenol
2.3,4.5 - Tetrachkxophenol
2,3,5,6 - Tetrachkxophenol
Pontachkxopheno!
Total chkxobenzenes ind. NOs
Total chtorophenols ind. NOs
jig/dscm
H9/dscm
ng/dacm
ng/dacm
(ig/dscm
ng/dscm
(ig/dscm
^g/dscrn
(tg/dscm
(ig/dscm
jxg/dsom
)ig/dscm
jig/dscm
Hg/dsom
ng/dsem
(lo/dscm
lig/dscm
(lo/dscm
H9/dscm
ng/dsem
(ig/dscm
lig/tiscm
jig/dsem
ixg/dscm
(ig/dscm
ng/dscm
ug/dscm
(ig/dscm
tig/dscm
NO 0.002
EMPC 0.08
NO 0.003
NO 0.01
NO 0.01
NO 0.01
NO 0.01
NO 0.01
NO 0.01
NO 0.02
NO 0.06
NO 0.15
aH NO
afl NO
NO 0.71
NO 0.68
NO 0.69
NO 0.61
NO 0.56
NO 0.56
NO 0.64
NA
NO 0.27
NO 0.65
NO 0.83
NO 0.75
NO 0.14
NO 0.67
NO 0.56
NO 0.71
NO 0.30
NO 0.71
NO 0.25
NO 0.92
NO 0.90
NO 0.81
NO 0.90
NO 1.01
NO 0.71
NO 1.15
NO 1.88
NO 6.20
NO 12.38
A2-23
-------
TABLE A2-8. SS9 - COMBUSTION AIR SUMMARY
(continued)
Substance j
/
-------
TABLE A2-9.SS10 -TREATED SOIL SUMMARY
Substanca
Total
Poly
Chta
Units
Condition 2 - Soil
Flag Run 1| Flag Run 2
stream flow rate
kg/hr
IbAir
127
280
25.5
56.3
chlorinated biphanyls (PCS)
Monochlorobiphanyt (total)
Dichlorobiphenyl (total)
Tnchlorobiphanyt (total)
Tetrachlorobiphanyl (total)
Pentachlofobiphanyl (total)
Haxachlorobiphanyl (total)
Haptachlorobiphanyl (total)
Octachtorobiphanyl (total)
Nonachlorobiphenyl (total)
Deeaehlorobiphanyl (total)
Total PCBs (Tri-Daca)
Total PCBs (Mono-Daca)
Hg^g
tig^g
ngfcg
vgfcg
ns" 4819000
•Jl NO
NO 56
NO 56
NO 56
NO 168
NO 56
NO 56
NO .56
NO 168
NO 56
NO 70
NO 126
580
NO 56
NO 56
NO 56
NO 56
NO 56
NO 56
NO 56
NO 336
NO 56
NO 56
NO 56
NO 56
NO 56
NO 280
NO 110
NO 56
NO 166
BQL 59
< 1100
< 841
> 580
> 59
A2-25
-------
TABLE A2-9. SS10 - TREATED SOIL SUMMARY
(continued)
^ Subatanca L
Polye
Otox
•
yclic aromauc nyorocarpona ir*n;
Naphthalana
Z-Methylnaphthalene
a-O-Naphthalene
Acenaphthylena
Acsnapthene
Fluorene
Phenanthrene
Anthracana
Fluoranthana
Pyrane
Banzo (a) anthracana
Chrysena
Banzo (b) fluoranthana
Banzo (k) fluoranthana
Banzo (a) pyrena
Banzo (a) pyrena
Parylena
Indarto (1A3-cd) pyrena
Dibanz (a.h) anthracana
panzo (g h.l) parylene
total PAHs including NDs ,
Total PAHs excluding NDs
ns and furane
2378 TCDD
12378PaCOD
123478 HxCDD
123678 HxCDO
123789 HxCDO
1234678 HpCDO
OCDD
2378 TCDF
12378 PaCDF
23478 PaCDF
123478 HxCOF
123678 HXCDF
234678 HxCOF
123789 HxCDF
1234878 HpCDF
1234789 HpCDF
OCDF
TCDO (total)
PaCDO (total)
HXCDD (total)
HpCDD (total)
TCDF (total)
PaCDF (total)
HxCDF (total)
HpCDF (total)
Total doxins (by isomar) ind. NO*
Total furans (by Isomar) Ind. ND»
Total doxWturans (by Isomar) Ind. NDs
Total doxins (by Isomar) axd. NDs
Total furans (by Isomar) axd. Nds
Total doxln/furans (by Isomar) axd. NDs
Units F
58
tig/kg
£$g
ng*g
ng/kg
u>gfcg
Hfl/kg
tig/kg
fig/kg
s
ng/kg
ng/kg
ng/kg
ng/kg
ng/kg
ng/kg
ng/kg
ng/kg
ng/kg
ng/kg
ng/kg
ng/kg
ng/kg
ng/kg
ng/kg
ng/kg
ng/kg
ng/kg
ng/kg
ng/kg
ng/kg
ng/kg
ng/kg
ng/kg
ng/kg
ng/kg
ng/kg
ng/kg
ng/kg
Condition 2 - Ssoil I
:(aq Run 1| Flag Run 2 1
1 NO 9000
NO 9000
NO 9000
NO 9000
NO 9000
NO 9000
NO 9000
NO 9000
NO 9000
NO 9000
NO 9000
NO 9000
NO 9000
NO 9000
NO 9000
NO 9000
NO 9000
NO 9000
NO 9000
NO 9000
NO 180OOO
all NO
780
1700
1600
2500
36000
450000
130
270
230
NO 1300
1300
110
420
1300G
4300
12000C
110C
890C
3400C
9300C
260C
330C
27CXX
4930O
< 141001
< 634001
al detected
> 140001
> 632001
NO S6
NO 36
BQL 120
NO S8
NO 56
BQL 180
NO 56
BQL 76
BQL 79
NO 56
NO 56
NO 56
NO 58
NO 56
NO 56
NO S8
NO 56
NO 56
NO 58
> - 1431
NO 26
14
18
91
290
3300
NO 12
NO 15
15
27
NO 0.53
S 4
1300
36
950
364
260
660
71
35
110
1400
< 2360
< 6040
> 3645
> 2333
> 5978
A2-26
-------
TABLE A2-9. SS10 - TREATED SOIL SUMMARY
(continued)
Substance
Volatile organic compounds
Vinyl chloride
Methyl chloride
Trans-1 , 2-dichloroethene
Cis- 1 .2-dichloroethene
Chloroform
1,1.1 - Trichloroethane
Carbon tetrachkxide
Benzene
1 .2 - Dichloroethane
Trichloroethene
Toluene
1.1.2- Trichloroethane
Tetrachloroethene
1 ,2 = Dibromoethane
Chlorobenzone
Ethylbenzene
M-/P-Xylene
O-Xylene
1 ,3 • Oichlorobenzene
1 ,4 • Dichlorobenzene
1 .2 - Oichlorobenzene
Units
Condition 2 - Soil
Flag Run 1| Flag Run 2
ug/kg
tig/kg
tig/kg
jig/kg
ng/kg
uq/kg
JAQ^g
u<^kg
Hg/Vg
ugAg
llofltQ
llQfl&Q
lio^cg
tlQ/ko
pg/kg
ugAg
ng/Vg
u.g/kg
ngfcg
LlQ/kG
w^Ko
Trace metals
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Beryllium
Cadmium
Chromium (Total)
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Phosphorus
Selenium
Silver
Thallium
Tin
Zinc
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
Mloeeilaneous
Total organic carbon
Total sulfur (as S)
Ash
Moisture
Organic halogens (as chloride)
Inorganic halogens (as chloride)
Total halogens (as chloride)
Hexavalent chromium
ppmw
wt%
wt%
wt%
ppbw
ppmw
ppmw
ppmw
3 BQL 81
3 140
3 - NO 28
3 BQL 66
3 NO 28
3 NO 28
3 NO 28
3 NO 28
3 NO 28
3 220
3 BQL 36
3 NO 28
3 NO 28
3 NO 28
3 NO 28
3 NO 28
3 BQL 34
3 BQL 32
3 NO 28
3 NO 28
3 NO 28
3 NO 34
3 ' 520
3 NO 34
3 BQL 120
3 BQL 41
3 NO 34
3 NO 34
3 ALR 5100
3 NO 34
3 190
190
3 NO 34
3 NO 34
3 BQL 41
3 BQL 87
3 - BQL 78
3 BQL 88
3 BQL 68
3 200
3 NO 34
3 220
9.6
19
88
0.31
1
26
60
176
280
0.24
28
1800
NO 7.4
NO 0.74
8.5
6400
400
16
NO 7.4
110
0.31
9.4
440
70
110
200
NO 0.15
27
130
NO 7.4
NO 0.74
NO 7.4
NO 14000
700
8270
< 0.01
62
. 28
NA
NA
5 0.1
NO 0.01
4920
< 0.01
44
41
NA
NA
S 0.3
NO 0.01
A2-27
-------
TABLE A2-9. SS10 - TREATED SOIL SUMMARY
(continued)
Substance
TCU
Ttt.1
volatile organic*
Vinyl chloride
Methyl chloride
Tran»-1,2-dfchloroethene
Cis-1 2-dlchforoethene
Chloroform
1.1.1 -Trichtoroethane
Carbon tetrachtoride
Benzene
1.2-Dlchloroethane
Trichloroethene
Toluene
1.1.2-Trichtoroetnane
Tetrachloroethene
1 ,2 - Dibromoetnane
Chtorobenzene
Ethylbonzene
M-/P-Xylene
O-Xytone
1.3 - Dtehtorobenzene
1 .4 - Dichlorobenzene
1 3. • Dtehlorobenzene
t
Units'
Condition 2 • Soil
Flag Run 1| Flag F1un2
JA9^i
{jg/L,
JAQ/1.
ng/L
jig/l.
H9/L
(ig/L*
jig/L'
ng/L
ng/L
jig/L
H9/L
H9/L
ng/L
ixc^Li
t&Q/L
nrt/L
liQ/ta
3 80
3 ALR 1200
3 NO 10
3 64
3 NO 10
3 NO 10
3 NO 10
3 SQL 16
3 NO 10
3 83
3 SQL 18
3 NO 10
3 NO 10
3 NO 10
3 NO 10
3 NO . 10
3 NO 10
3 BOL 10
3 NO 10
3 NO 10
3 NO 10
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
trace metal*
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Lead
mercury
Setanfum
Silver
tlQ/llB
UQ/la
L1Q^«
110/L
UClAa
Hrt^L
Mr^^
Mrt/J^
NO 100
1700
11
NO 10
NO 50
NO 0.4
NO 100
NO 10
NO 100
1500
NO 10
NO 10
NO 50
NO 0.4
NO 100
NO 10
A2-28
-------
TABLE A2-10. SS11 - REACTOR GRIT SUMMARY
Substance
Tola
Poly
Ohio
Units
Condition 1
Waste water
Flag Composite
Condition 2
Soil
Flag Composite
Condition 3
Waste OH
Flag Composite
u strum now rat* : — : — — '
Run 1
Run 2
Run3
Average
kg/hr
kg/fir
kg/hr
kg/hr
0.134
0.049
0.014
0.0656
0.041
0.044
0.099
0.101
0.101
0.1003
chlorinated biphenyls (PCS) —
Monochloroblphenyl (total)
Dichtorobiphenyl (total)
TrJchtorobiphenyl (total)
Tetrachlorobiphenyl (total)
Pentachlorobiphenyl (total)
Hexacfilorobiphenyl (total)
Heptachlorobiphenyl (total)
Octachtorobipheny) (total)
Nonachlorobiphenyl (total)
Decachlorobiphenyl (total)
Total PCBs (Tri-Deca) including ND»
Total PCB» (Mono-Oeca) inducing NO*
Total PCBs (Tri-Oeca) excluding NO*
Total PCBs (Mono-Deca) excluding ND»
rob«nzMt«* and chloroph«notc
1 ,2-Dichlorobenzene
1 ,3-Dichlorobenzene
1 ,4-Oichlorobenzene
Total Dichkxobenzene»
1 ,2,3-Trichlorobenzen*
1 ,3,5-Triehlorobenzerw
t.2.4-Trichlorob«nzen«
Total Trichtorooenzerw*
1 ,2,3,4-Tetrachlorobenzene
1,2,3.5- and/or 1,2,4,5-Tetrachtorooenzene
Total Tetrachlorobenzenes
2.3-Dichloropnenol
2,4-Dichlorophenol
2,5-Dichlorophenof
2,6-Dichlorophenol
3.4-Dichlorophenol
3.5-Oichlorophenol
Total Oichkxophenoli
2,3,4-Trichlorophenol
2.3.5-Trichlorophenol
2,3,6-Tricriloropnonol
2,4.5-Trichlorophenol
2.4,6-Trichlorophenol
Total Trtehlorophertols
2.3.4,5,- and/or 2.3.4,6-Tetrachkxophonol
2,3,5,6-Tatrachloroprwnol
Total Tctrachlorophenols
Pentalchlorophenol
Total CB including N0«
Total CP including NDa
Total CB excluding NDs
Total CP excluding NO*
ng*g
fig/kg
us/kg
jig/kg
jigfcg
Mjfcg
ngfeg
ng/kg
>tg/kg
ngfcg
ng*g
ngfcg
ng/kg
Mi/kg
6400
60000
560000
SQL 1000000
SQL 460000
BQL 58000
14000
4500
840
BQL 38
2100000
2160000
all detected
all detected
410
BQL 360
BQL 460
BQL 660
BQL 270
BQL 19
BQL 2.5
NO 1600
NO 400
NO 220
< 3630
< 4400
> 1410
> 2180
900
740
520
570
BQL 210
BQL 28
BQL 4.7
NO 240
NO 60
NO 33
< 1670
< 3310
> 1237
> 2977
ng/kg
ng/kg
ng/kg
K9*g
ngfcg
ng^g
Hg/kg
^g
H9*g
ngfcg
Kg/kg
W*$
ng^a
(tg/kg
ng/kg
Roykg
H9A'3
ng*a
»ig*8
Wr*l?
tigrtcg
ng^g
ns*g
M-g^g
ngfrg
ng*g
jig'Kg
H»Vg
r1^!?
ng/kg
ttg^g
jtg'kg
H9*fl
HS^g
3 NO 430
3 NO 430
3 NO 430
3 NO 1290
3 NO 430
3 NO 430
3 NO 430
3 NO 1290
3 NO 430
3 NO 870
3 NO 1300
3 NO 430
3 NO 430
3 NO 430
3 NO 430
3 NO 430
3 NO 430
3 NO 430
3 NO 430
3 NO 2580
3 NO 430
3 NO 430
3 NO 430
3 NO 430
3 NO 430
3 NO 2150
3 NO 870
3 NO 430
3 NO 1300
3 NO 430
3 NO 4740
3 NO 6460
3 all NO
3 afl NO
NO 1900
NO 1900
BQL 1600
5400
NO 1900
NO 1900
BQL 1700
5500
NO 1900
NO 3900
NO 5800
NO 1900
SQL 3100
NO 1900
NO 1900
NO 1900
NO 1900
NO 1900
NO 1900
NO 1 1400
NO 1900
NO 1900
NO 1900
NO 1900
NO 1900
NO 9500
NO 3900
NO 1900
NO 5800
BQL 1800
< 21700
< 28500
> 6400
> 1800
NO 13000
NO 130X1
NO 130X1
NO 390X1
NO 13000
NO 13000
NO 13000
NO 39000
NO 13000
NO 270X1
NO 40000
NO 13000
NO 13000
NO 13000
NO 130X1
NO 13000
NO 130X1
NO 13000
NO 130X1
NO 780OO
NO 13000
NO 13000
NO 13000
NO 130X1
NO 13000
NO 650X1
NO 270X1
NO 130X1
NO 40000
NO 130X1
NO 144000
NO 196OX
al NO
al NO
A2-29
-------
TABLE A2-10. SS11 - REACTOR GRIT SUMMARY
(continued)
Substance
Poly<
Dtox
Units
cyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAH)
Naphthalene
2-Mothylnaphthalene
2-C(-NaphlhaIene
Acenaphthylene
Acenapthene
-luorooe
2 rt an an throne
Anthracene
Fluoranthene
Pyrene
Benzo (a) anthracene
Chrysene
Benzo (b) fluoranthene
Benzo (k) fluoranthene
Benzo (e) pyrene
Benzo (a) pyrene
Perylene
Indeno (1.2,3-cd) pyrene
Dibonz (a,h) anthracene
Benzo (g.h.i) perylene
Total PAHs including NDs
TotaJ PAHs excluding NOs
U.g/kg
jig/kg
wj^g
^9*9
)ig/kg
u.g/kg
u.gfcg
u.g/kg
jig/kg
ug/kg
Jig/kg
U(^(Cj
U,(^(g
|ig/kg
jig/kg
ng/kg
ng/kg
jig/kg
S3
u.g/kg
ngfcg
Condition 1
! Waste water
-lag Composite
3 160000
3 NO 8700
3 NO 8700
3 BQL 58000
3 NO 8700
3 BQL 12000
3 93000
3 BQL 12000
3 BQL 69000
3 BQL 83000
3 BQL 12000
3 BQL 20000
3 BQL 17000
3 NO 8700
3 BQL 15000
3 BQL 20000
3 NO 8700
!3 BQL 11000
3 NO 8700
3 BQL 21000
3 < 655000
3 » 603000
Condition 2
Soil
:laq Composite F
35 BQL 17000
35 ND 1900
35 NO 1900
35 NO 1900
35 BQL 2100
35 BQL 2100
35 120000
35 BQL 4600
35 120000
35 38000
35 BQL 4900
35 BQL 17000
35 BQL 7400
35 NO 1900
35 BQL 3600
35 NO 1900
35 NO 1900
35 NO 1900
35 NO 1900
35 ND 1900
35 < 354000
35 > 336700
Condition 3
Waste oil
-lag Composite
35 BQL 850()0
35 NO 13900
35 NO 13000
35 ND 13000
35 NO 13000
33 NO 13000
35 220000
35 ND 13000
35 170000
35 BQL 93000
35 ND 13000
35 BQL 22000
3S BQL 35000
35 NO 13000
35 BQL 27000
35 NO 13000
35 ND 13000
35 BQL 19QOO
3§ ND 13000
35 BQL 32000
35 < 646000
35 .» 703000
ra and furana :
2378 TCDD
12378 PeCDD
123478 HxCDO
123878 HxCOD
123789 HxCOD
1234678 HpCDO
OCDD
2378 TCOF
12378 PeCDF
23478 PeCDF
123478 HxCDF
123678 HXCOF
234678 HxCOF
123789 HxCOF
1234678 HpCDF
1234789 HpCDF
OCDF
TCOD (total)
PeCDD (total)
HxCDD (total)
HpCDO (total)
TCOF (total)
PeCDF (total)
HxCDF (total) .
HpCDF (total)
Total doxins (by Isomer) ind. NDs
Total furans (by Isomer) ind. NOs
TotaJ dtadn/furans (by isomer) ind. NDs
Total doxlns (by Isomer) exd. NDs
Total furans (by isomer) exd. Nds
Total doxin/furans (by Isomer) exd. NDs
ng/kg
ng/kg
ng/kg
ng/kg
ng/kg
ng/kg
ng/kg
ng/kg
ng/kg
ng/kg
ng/kg
n§/kg
ng/kg
ng/Jcg
ng/kg
ng/ks
ng/kg
ng/kg
ng/kg
ng/kg
ng/kg
ng/kg
ng/kg
ng/kg
ng/kg
ng/kg
ng/kg
ng/kg
ng/kg
ng/kg
ng/kg
ND 0.64
NO 2.1
NO 0.38
NO 0.69
NO 0.65
1.8
12
11
8
64
20
6.7
8
6
8.3
6.5
22
ND 14.1
NO 29.4
NO 5.73
F 3.4
380
220
68
25
< 18.3
161
< 17S
> 13.8
al detected
> 17S
NO 13
. 18
13
5.9
2.3
42
43
14
18
NO 38
41
46
35
13
110
1*
42
286
16
160
80
530
330
300
100
< 135.2
< 38S
< 504
> 12ZJ
> 33
> 45s
ND 11
ND 17
NO 2.6
NO 3.6
NO 3
9.5
20
NO 14
NO 20
NO 24
ND 6
NO 4.3
NO 4.2
NO S.6
NO 4.8
ND 4.4
8
ND 242
NO 238
NO 30.7
21
NO 532
NO 616
NO 80.4
ND 18.4
< 66.7
< 95.3
< 162
> 29.5
» 8
> 37.5|
A2-30
-------
TABLE A2-10. SS11 - REACTOR GRIT SUMMARY
(continued)
Substanc«
Units
Volatile organic compounds
Vinyl chloride
Methyl chloride
Trans-1,2-o1chloroetnene
Cis-1,2-dichloroetriene
Chloroform
1,1,1 • Trichtoroetfiano
Carbon tatrachkxide
Benzene
l,2-Dichloro«than«
Trichloroetherw
Toluena
1,1.2-Trichkxoethana
Tetraehloroethen*
1.2-Dibromoethane
Chtorobenzen*
Ettiylbenzene
M-VP-Xytone
O-Xytone
1 ,3 • DichlorobenzerM
1,4-Dlchlorobenzene
1,2- Dfcrttorobenzene
Trace metals
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Beryllium
Cadmium
Chromium (total)
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Phosphorus
Selenium
Silver
Thallium
Tin
Zinc
Ml/kg
jig/kg
ug/kg
fig/kg
ngfcg
fig/kg
^9*9
Kg/kg
H9*g
ug/kg
nsfcg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug*g
ugfcg
w>fcg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
Condition 1
Waste water
Flag Composite
Condition 2
Soil
Flag Composite
ND 14
NO 14
NO 14
NO 14
ND 14
NO 14
NO 14
430
NO 14
NO 14
SQL 16
NO 14
NO 14
ND 14
ND 14
ND 14
NO 14
NO 14
NO 14
NO 14
NO 14
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mo/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
4 NA
4 NA
4 NA
4 NA
4 NA
4 NA
4 NA
4 NA
4 NA
4 NA
4 NA
4 NA
4 NA
4 NA
4 NA
4 NA
4 NA
45 10
4S 79
4S -NO 2
45 SQL 6
45 SQL 3
45 SQL 5
45 NO 2
45 190
45 NO 2
45 90
45 33
45 SQL 4
45 23
45 NO 2
45 NO 2
45 BQL 4
45 SQL 7
45 BQL 5
45 NO 2
45 NO 2
45 ND 2
NO 5
46
63
NO 0.05
2.2
71
51
23
600
ND O.t
120
590
NO 5
ND 0.5
22
NA
64
Miscellaneous
Total organic carbon
Total sulfur (as S)
Ash
Organic halogens (as chloride)
Inorganic halogens (as chloride)
Total halogens (as chloride)
Hexavalcnt chromium
ppmw
wt%
wt%
ppbw
ppmw
ppmw
ppmw
4 NA
4 NA
4 NA
4 NA
4 NA
4 NA
4 NA
17300
< 0.01
82
2230
NA
NA
ND 0.02
Condition 3
Waste oil
Flag Composite
2.38 NO 20
2.38 210
2.38 NO 20
2.38 NO 20
2.38 ND 20
2.38 ND 20
2.38 ND 20
2.38 ALR 17000
2,38 NO 20
2.38 NO 20
2.38 NO 20
2.38 NO 20
2.38 NO 20
2,38 ND 20
2.38 ND 20
2,38 NO 20
2.38 NO 20
2.38 ND 20
2.38 NO 20
2.38 NO 20
2.33 ND 20
NO 5
23
30
NO 0.5
NO 0.5
27
10
6.7
330
NO 0.1
•I 00
300
NO 5
NO 0.5
8
21
25
3 60900
< 0.01
88.5
3 205
5 NA
0.73
NA
A2-31
-------
TABLE A2-10. SS11 - REACTOR GRIT SUMMARY
(continued)
Substance
Units
Condition 1
Waste water
Flag Composite
Condition 2
Soil
Flag Composite
Conditions
Waste oil
Flag Composite
TCLP volatile organic* :
Vinyl chloride
Methyl chloride
Trans- 1 ,2-dlchIoroethene
Cis-1.2-dichloroethene
Chloroform
1.1.1 - Trichtoroethane
Carbon tetrachloride
Benzene
1.2-Dtehloroethane
Trichloroethene
Toluene
1.1,2-Trichloroethane
Tetrachloroethene
1 ,2 • Dibromoetftana
Chforobenzene
Ethylbenzene
M-/P-Xytene
O-Xyfene
1 ,3 - Dtehtorobenzene
1 ,4 - DSchkxobenzene
1 .2 - Dlchkxobenzene
v-gfl-
H9rt=
jig^.
US"-
ngrt-
WCL
V-&L,
ng4.
ngt
H9/1-
ngfl.
^g'L,
tigt
ng'i.
jig'i.
V&L
jigt
>tgrt»
(igt
HSt
»«yi.
4 NA
4 NA
4 NA
4 NA
4 NA
4 NA
4 NA
4 NA
4 NA
4 NA
4 NA
4 NA
4 NA
4 NA
4 NA
4 NA
4 NA
4 NA
4 NA
4 NA
4 NA
NO 10
SQL 12
NO 16
NO 10
NO 10
NO 10
NO 10
NO 10
NO 10
NO 10
BQL 11
NO 10
NO 10
NO 10
NO 10
NO 10
NO 10
NO 10
NO 10
NO 10
NO 10
4 NA
4 NA
4 NA
4 NA
4 NA
4 NA
4 NA
4 NA
4 NA
4 NA
4 NA
4 NA
4 NA
4 NA
4 NA
4 NA
4 NA
4 NA
4 NA-
4 NA
4 NA
TCLP trace metals
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Lead
Mercury
Selenium
Silver
tigrt.
^9^
jig'i.
jigfl-
"flrt-
tig'L
Hgt
HC>/L
4 NA
4 NA
4 NA
4 NA
4 NA
4 NA
4 NA
4 NA
410
3200
NO 10
12
SO
NO 0.4
NO 100
NO 10
4 NA
4 NA
4 NA
4 NA
4 NA
4 NA
4 NA
4 NA
A2-32
-------
TABLE A2-11. SS12 - SCRUBBER SLUDGE SUMMARY
Substance
To
PC
Po
Po
tal stream flow rat*
Rum
Run 2
Run 3
Average
lychlorlnated blphenyl* (PCS)
Monochlorobiphenyl (total)
Oichlorobiph«ny) (total)
Trichtorobiphanyl (total)
Tatrachlorobiphenyl (total)
Pentachtorobiphenyl (total)
Hexaehlorobiphenyl (total)
Haptachlorobiphonyl (total)
Octachlorobiphenyl (total)
Nonachlorobiphenyl (total)
Decachlorobiphenyl (total)
Total PCBs (Tri-Deca) in NDs
Total PCS* (Mono-Deca) in NDs
Total PCBs (Tri-Deca) ax NDs
Total PCBs (Mono-Deca) ex NOs
Units
kg/hr
kg/hr
kg/hr
kg/hr
ng/kg
wg/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ng&g
jig/kg_
ug^g
jig^g
^g^g
ugfcg
lyehlorinated blphenyla (PCS)
Monochlorobiphenyl (total)
Dichlorobiphenyl (total)
Trichtorobiphenyl (total)
Tatrachlorobiphonyl (total)
Pentachkxobiphenyt (total)
Hexachlofobiphenyl (total)
Heptachlorobiphenyl (total)
Oetachtorobiphenyl (total)
Nonachlorobiphanyl (total)
Decaehlorobiphenyl (total)
Total PCSs (Tri-Deca) in NDt
Total PCBs (Mono-Deca) in NOs
Total PCBs (Tri-Deea) ex NDs
Total PCBs (Mono-Deca) ax NOs
lig^g
(tg^g
(ig^g
ug^g
tig/kg
ng^cg
ng/fcg
ug^cg
ug^cg
poAg
H9^g
ug/kg
ug^g
H9^9
lychlortnated biphenyls (PCS)
Monochlorobiphanyl (total)
Dichlorobiphenyl (total)
Trichtorobiphoriyl (total)
Tetrachlorobiphenyl (total)
Pentachlorobiphenyl (total)
Hexachlorobiphenyl (total)
Hoptachlorobiphenyl (total)
Octachlorobiphenyl (total)
Nonachlorobiphanyl (total)
Decachlofobiphenyl (total)
Total PCB« (Trt-Deca.) in NDs
Total PCBs (Mono-Deca) in NOs
Total PCBs (Tri-Deca) ax NOs
Total PCBs (Mono-Deca) ex NDs
»g/kg
tig^g
ug/kg
>ig*g
Mgflcg
>*9*g
ug^g
ug^g
ng^g
(ig/kg
ng/tcg
ug/kg
uoyVg
ug/kg
Condition 1
.Waste water
Flag Composite
3.10
3.20
2.64
2.979
Run 1
NO 230
NO 910
SQL 27
NO 6300
NO 6900
NO 6300
NO 5400
NO 2700
NO 680
NO -380
< 28700
< 29800
V 27
> 27
Run 2
NO 120
SQL 100
SQL 320
SQL 350
BQL 42
NO 3400
NO 2900
NO 1500
NO 370
NO 200
< 9O80
< 9300
> 712
> 920
Run 3
530
500
870
BQL 610
SOU 97
NO 1900
NO 1700
NO 830
NO 210
NO 120
< 6340
< 7370
> 1577
> 2600
Condition 2
Soil
Flag Composite
0.47
0.44
Composite
BQL 68
BQL 230
BQL 1300
BQL 1200
BQL 470
BQL 61
NO 7700
NO 3900
NO 960
NO 530
< 16100
< 16400
> 3031
> 3321
_""
-
-
Condition 3
Waste oil
Flag Composite
32.9
17.8
1S.5
22.06
Hun 1
28 BQL 77
28 BQL 220
28 BQL 720
28 BQL 720
28 BQL 44
28 NO 'J3000
28 NO '11000
28 NO 5600
28 ND 1400
28 BQL 130
28 < 32600
28 < 32900
28 > 1614
28 > 2208
Run 2
28 BQL 53
28 BQL 42
28 BQL 130
28 BQL 240
28 BQL 72
28 BQL 3.8
28 NO 1100
28 NO 570
28 NO 140
28 ND 79
28 < 2340
28 < 2430
28 > 446
28 > 540
-
A2-33
-------
TABLE A2-11. SS12 - SCRUBBER SLUDGE SUMMARY
(continued)
Substance
Ct
Tn
Units
: Condition 1
; Waste water
Flag Composite
Condition 2
Soil
Flag Composite
Condition 3
Waste oil
Flag Composite
tlorobenzenee and chlor ophenote
1,2-Dichlofobenzene
1.3-Dichlorobonzene
1 ,4-Dichlorobenzene
TotaJ dichlorobenzones
1 ,2,3-Trichlofobenzene
1 ,3.5-Trichlof otxwizeno
1.2.4-Trichlorooenzen«
Total tridilorobenzenes
1 ,2,3,4- Totrachlofobeozone
1,2,3,5- and/or 1.2,4.5-TetrachtoroDenzen*
Total tetrachlorobenzenes
Pentachkxobenzene
Hexachlorobenzene
2,3-Dlchlorophenol
2.4-DIch!ofophenol
2.5-Olchlofophenol
2,6-Dichlorophenol
3,4-D!chloroph«nol
3.5-DIchlorophenol
Total dteWoropheool*
2.3.4-Trichlorophenol
2,3.5-Trichloroptonol
2.3.6-Trtehlorophenol
2.4.5-Trtehlofophenol
2.4.6-Trtehlorophenol
Total trichkxophenol*
2,3.4,5,- and/or 2.3,4.6-Tetrachlorophenol
2.3.5,e-Tetrachlorophenol
Total tatrachloropnenols
Pentacntorophenol
Total C8 inducing NDi
Total CP Inducing NDs
Total CB exdudng NDs
Total CP oxdudng NO*
^9
us/kg
ng/fcg
^g/kg
tig/kg
jigfcg
ng/kg
ng/kg
ng/hg
ngfcg
US/kg
ng/i
-------
TABLEA2-11. SS12
> SCRUBBER SLUDGE SUMMARY
(continued)
Substance
PC
Ul
Units
Condition 1
Waata water
Flag Composite
Condition 2
Soil
Flag Composite
Condition 3
Waste oil
Flag Composite
ilycycilc aromatic hydrocarbons (PAH)
Naphthalene
2-Methylnaphthalene
2-CI-Naphthalene
Acenaphthylene ' '
Acenapthene
Fluorene
Phenanthrene
Anthracene
Fluoranthene
Pyrene
Chrysene
B«nzo (b) fluoranth«ne
Benzo (k) fluoranthene
B«nzo (0) pyrene
Benzo (a) pyrene
Perylene
Indano (1,2,3-cd) pyrona
Diben2 (a,h) anthracene
Benzo (g.h.i) perylene
Total PAHs including NO*
Total PAHs excluding NO*
ngfcg
ngfcg
>ig*g
pgfog
ngfcg
ngfcg
ng^g
ngfcg
ngfcg
Ho/Kg
ngfcg
tig/fcg
^g/i 12774000
35 BQL 59000
35 ND 13000
35 NO 13000
35 170000
35 NO 13000
35 BQL 57000
35 6900000
35 550000
35 11000000
35 12000000
35 580000
35 970000
35 BQL 91000
35 660000
35 840000
35 450000
35 660000
35 BQL 38000
35 . 880000
35 < 38300000
35 < 36261000.
36 QS 11000000
36 ND 160000
38 NO H50000
36 5000000
36 NO 1(50000
36 BQL 340000
36 5200000
36 BQL 540000
36 4400000
36 6300000
36 BQL 600000
36 BQL 670000
36 BQL 200000
38 BQL 770000
36 BQL 1200000
36 BQL 3)30000
36 BQL 9:20000
36 ND 180000
36 2330000
36 < 40700000
36 > 40060000
»xtna and furana
2378 TCOO
12378 PaCDD
123478 HxCOO
123678 HxCDD
123789 HxCOO
1234678 HpCOO
OCOO
2378 TCDF
12378PaCOF
23478 PaCDF
123478 HxCOF
123678 HXCOF
234678 HxCOF
123789 HxCDF
1234678 HpCOF
1 234789 HpCDF
OCDF
TCOO (total)
PaCDD (total)
HxCOO (total)
HpCDD (total)
TCDF (total)
PaCDF (total)
HxCDF (total)
HpCOF (total)
Total dtoxins (by isomar) inducing NOa
Total furam (by l$omor) including NO*
Total doxina/Turans (by Isomer) inc NDo
Total ofoxint (by isomer) exdudng ND«
Total furan* (by Isomor) excluding N0«
Total doxins/luran* (by isomer) ax. NDs
ngrtcg
ngAcg
ng/kg
ngfl 3550
> 80
> 3630
NO 2200
ND 5000
ND 1500
ND 1500
NO 1600
14000
190000
7200
4200
ND 8400
5600
7000
5800
1600
16000
2900
56000
8700
37000
31000
27000
230000
90000
66000
28000
< 216000
< 115000
< 331000
> 204000
> 106000
> 310000
ND 40
NO 73
NO 26
ND 25
ND 18
100
310
ND 170
NO 120
NO 180
ND 47
NO 56
92
36
210
65
350
ND 830
79
2400
200
1200
550
490
410
< 592
< 1330
< 1920
> 410
> 753
> 1163
A2-35
-------
TABLE A2-11. SS12
> SCRUBBER SLUDGE SUMMARY
(continued)
Substance
Units
! Condition 1
'Waste water
Flag Composite
Condition 2
Soil
Flag Composite
Conditions
Waste oil
Flag Composite
Volatile organic compound*
Ml
Vinyl chloride
Methyl chloride
Trans-1,2-dlchloroethene
Cis-1 ,2-dichloroethene
Chloroform
1.1.1 - TrichtoroetJiane
Carbon tetrachtoride
Benzene
1,2-Dich(oro«tJiane
Trfchloroethene
Toluene
1,1,2 -Trlchtoroethana
Tetrachloroethene
1 .2 - Dibromoethane
Chlorobenzene
Ethylbenzene
M-/P-Xytene
O-Xylene,
1.3 - Dlchlorobenzene
1.4 - Oichlorobenzene
1,2 - Dlchlorobenzene
•cellaneou*
Total sulfur (as S)
Organic halogens (as chloride)
Inorganic halogens (as chloride)
Hexavalent chromium
ug/kg
ug/kg
tig/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
us/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
wt %
ppbw
ppmw
ppmw
Physical characteristic*
Density
PH.
g/cc
ND 22
BQL 73
ND 22
NO 22
NO 22
NO 22
NO 22
ALR 15000
ND 22
NO 22
1100
NO 22
ND 22
NO 22
ND 22
ND 22
ND 22
NO 22
"ND 22
ND ' 22
NO 22
45 ND 44
45 NO 44
45 ND 44
45 ND 44
45 ND 44
45 BQL 90
45 NO 44
45 2400
45 NO 44
45 ND 44
45 NO 44
45 ND 44
45 NO 44
45 ND 44
45 ND 44
45 ND 44
45 NO 44
45 ND 44
45 ND 44
45 NO 44
45 NO 44
»
4 NA
4 NA
4 i NA
4 NA
4 NA
4 NA
4 NA
4 NA
39 NO 18
39 NO 18
39 NO 18
39 NO 18
39 NO 18
39 ND 18
39 ND 18
39 NO 18
39 NO 18
39 NO 18
39 NO 18
39 ND 18
39 NO 18
39 NO 18
39 BQL 32
39 BQL 51
39 NO 18
39 ND 18
39 NO 18
39 NO 18
39 NO 18
4 NA
4 NA
4 NA
4 NA
4 I NA
4 NA
4 NA
4 NA
4 NA
4 NA
TCLP volatile organic*
Vinyl chloride
Methyl chloride
Trans-1 ,2-dtehloroethena
Cis-1 ,2-dehloroethene
Chloroform
1.1,1-Trichloroetharte
Carbon tetracMoride
Benzene
1,2-Dfchkxoethane
Trichloroethene
Toluene
1.1,2-TriehIoroemane
Tetrachloroethene
1,2 • Dibromoethane
Chlorobenzene
Ethylbenzene
IUI •/P«¥if l&n a%
rrl It ^jIWJIw .
O-Xylene
1 .3 - Dlchlorobenzene
1 ,4 - Otchkxobenzerw
1 Z • Dlchlorobenzane
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ugfcg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
4 : NA
4 NA
4 NA
4 NA
4 NA
4 NA
4 NA
4 NA
4 NA
4 NA
4 NA
4 NA
4 ' NA
4 NA
4 NA
4 NA
4 ; NA
4 NA
4 NA
4 NA
4 NA
4 NA
4 NA
4 NA
4 NA
4 NA
4 NA
4 NA
4 NA
4 NA
4 NA
4 NA
4 NA
4 NA
4 NA
4 NA
4 NA
4 NA
4 NA
4 NA
4 NA
4 NA
4 NA
4 NA
4 NA
4 NA
4 NA
4 NA
4 NA
4 NA
4 NA
4 NA
4 NA
4 NA
4 NA
4 NA
4 NA
4 NA
4 NA
4 NA
4 NA
4 NA
4 NA
TCLP trace metate
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Lead
Mercury
Selenium
Silver
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ugflcg
ug/kg
4 NA
4 NA
4 NA
4 NA
4 NA
4 ' NA
4 NA
4 NA
4 NA
4 NA
4 NA
4 NA
4 NA
4 NA
4 NA
4 NA
4 NA
4 NA
4 NA
4 NA
4 NA
4 NA
4 NA
4 NA
A2-36
-------
TABLE A2-12. SS13 - SCRUBBER DECANT WATER
Substance
Tol
Pol
Chi
Units
Condition 1
Wasta watar
Flag Composita
Condition 2
Soil
Flag Composite
al stream flow rat*
Run 1
Run 2
Run 3
Average
kg/hr
kg/hr
kg/hr
kg/hr
97.2
101
97.9
98.60
88.0
81.5
Conditions
Waste oil
Flag Composite
236
375
445
352.0
ychlorinatad blphenyls (PCS)
Monochlorobiphenyl (total)
Dichlorobjphenyl (total)
Trichiorobiphenyl (total)
Tetradilorobiphenyl (total)
Pontaehkxobtphenyl (total)
Hexadilorobiphenyl (total)
Heptadilorobiphenyl (total)
Octachlorobiphenyl (total)
Nonachlorobiphenyl (total)
Oecachlorobiphenyl (total)
Total RGBs (Tri-Doca) in NOs
Total PCBs (Mono-Deca) in NOs
Total PCBs (Tri-Deca) ax ND»
Total PCBs (Mono-Oeca) ox NOs
orob*nzen«« and ehlorophano!*
1 ,2-Dichlorobenzene
,3-Dichlofobenzene
,4-Dichlorobenzene
Total drchlorobenzenes
,2,3-Trichlorobenzene
,3,5-TrichlorobenzerMi
,2,4-Triehlorobenzene
Total tridilorobenzanes
,2.3,4-Tatrachlorobenzene
,2,3,5- and/or 1 ,2.4,5-Tetrachlorobenzene
Total tetrachlorobenzenes •
Pentachkxobenzene
Hexachlorobenzene
2,3-Oicnlorophanol
2,4-DIchlorophenol
2.5-Dichlorophenor
2,6-Dichlorophenol
3,4-Diehloropnenol
3.5-Oichlorophanol
Total dchlorophanols
2,3,4-Trichlorophenoi
2.3,5-TrichlOfOphenol
2,3,6-TricniofOpneno!
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol
Total trfchkxophanoU
2,3,4,5,- and/or 2,3,4,6>Tatrachloroph«nol
2.3,5,6-Tetrachlorophenol
Total tefrachlorophenols
Pantachlorophanol
Total C8 inducing NOs
Total CP inducing NDs
Total CB axdudng NOs
Total CP axdudng NOs
lig/L
jig/L
^g«.
ngA-
ug/L
jig/L
H9"-
ngfl.
ng/L
ngfl-
^gA.
jigt-
^g^
^g/L
ug/u
Hgt
ngfl-
ngt
(igrt.
ngfl-
ngrt.
V&L
jtg/U
H9t-
H9t-
|A9^.
ngt
\iglL
Hgt
ugfl.
ugA.
".grt.
jigt
ugA.
ug/L
ng/L
^gA-
^g«.
tig'i.
ug/L
ng/L
u,grt.
ng/L
uig'L
ug/l.
u.g«-
Hgd.
i^gt
NO 1.5
NO 6.2
SQL 0.03
NO 43
NO 47
NO 43
NO 37
NO 18
NO 4.6
NO 2.6
< 195
< 203
> 0.03
> 0.03
NO 5.1
NO 5.1
NO 5.1
NO 15.3
NO 5.1
NO 5.1
NO 5.1
NO 15.3
NO 5.1
NO 10
NO 15.1
NO 5.1
NO 5.1
NO 5.1
NO 5.1
NO 5.1
NO 5.1
NO 5.1
NO 5.1
NO 25.5
NO 5.1
NO 5.1
NO 5.1
NO 5.1
NO 5.1
NO 25.5
NO 10
NO 5.1
NO 15.1
NO 5.1
NO 55.9
NO 71.2
ad NO
all NO
49 NO 0.45
49 BQL 0.02
49 BQL 0.1
49 BQL 0.06
49 NO 14
49 NO 13
49 NO 11
49 NO 5.4
49 NO 1.3
49 NO 0.75
49 < 45.6
49 < 46.1
49 > 0.16
49 > 0.18
NO 20
NO 20
NO 20
NO 60
NO 20
NO 20
NO 20
NO 60
NO 20
NO 40
NO 60
NO 20
NO 20
NO 20
NO 20
NO 20
NO 20
NO 20
NO 20
NO 120
NO 20
NO 20
NO 20
NO 20
NO 20
NO 100
NO 40
NO 20
NO 60
NO 20
NO 220
NO 300
ai NO
aH NO
BQL 0.005
NO 1.2
BQL 1.21
NO 8.4
NO 92
NO 8.4
NO 7.2
ND 3.6
NO 0.9
NO 0.5
< 39.4
< 40.6
> 1.21
> 1.22
1 NO 1.1
1 NO 1.1
1 NO 1.1
1 NO 3.3
1 ND 1.1
1 ND 1.1
1 ND 1.1
1 NO 3.3
1 ND 1.1
1 NO 2.3
1 NO 3.4
1 ND 1.1
1 ND 1.1
1 NO 1.1
1 NO 1.1
1- ND- 1.1
1 ND 1.1
1 ND 1.1
1 NO 1.1
1 NO 5.5
1 ND 1.1
1 ND 1.1
1 ND 1.1
1 NO 1.1
1 ND 1.1
1 NO 5.5:
1 ND 2.3
1 ND 1.1
1 NO 3.4
1 NO 1.1
1 NO 12.2
1 NO 15.5
1 al ND
1 al NO
A2-37
-------
TABLE A2-12. SS13 - SCRUBBER DECANT WATER
(continued)
Substance
Units
Condition 1
Waste water
Flag Composite
Condition 2
Soil
Flag Composite
Condition 3
Waste oil
Flag Composite
Polycydlc aromatic hydrocarbons (PAH)
Dto
Naphthalene
2-MethylnaphthaJene
2-CI-NapriUialene
Acenaphthylene
Acenapthene
Fluorene
Phenanthrene
Anthracene
Fluoranthene
Pyrene
Benzo (a) anthracene
Chrysene
Bonzo (b) fluoranthena
Benzo (k) fluoranthena
Benzo (a) pyrene
Benzo (a) pyrena
Perytene
Indeno (1,2.3-cd) pyrena
Dibenz (a,h) anthracene
Benzo (g.h.i) perytone
TotaJ PAH* including NO»
Total PAHs excludng NDs
US/L
HS/I-
|ig/L
H9fl-
M/L
ng/L
n&-
Hg/L
v0i-
ng/L
ng^
u-gfl-
ust.
M/L
H9/U
ng/L
jig/L
«?/»•
HSfl"
_jig/L_
tisfl-
usrt.
3900
BQL 20
NO S.1
1400
BQL 12
65
BQL 540
51
210
260
BQL 13
BQL 25
BQL 22
BQL 7.8
BQL 22
BQL 36
BQL 12
BQL 11
NO 5.1
BQL 21
< 6640
> 6630
35 1000
35 ND 20
35 NO 20
35 430
35 NO 20
35 BQL 25
35 650
35 610
35 550
35 590
35 NO 20
35 BQL 62
35 BQL 83
35 NO 20
35 BQL 68
35 BQL 78
35 BQL 47
35 BQL 58
3§ NO 20
35 BQL 86
35 < 4460
35 > 4340
13000
Ql 31
NO 1.1
BQL 1800
24
45
ALR 150
BQL 9.8
59
64
ND 1.1
BQL 2.4
BQL 2.8
NO 1.1
BQL 3
BQL 2.S
ND 1.1
BQL 2.5
ND 1.1
BQL 4.9
15200
15200
jdns and furart*
2378 TCOO
12378 PeCDO
123478 HxCDD
123678 HxCDD
123789 HxCDD
1 234678 HpCOO
OCDO
2378 TCOF
12378 PaCOF '
23478 PaCDF
123478 HxCDF
123878 HXCOF
234878 HxCDF
123789 HxCDF
1 234678 HpCDF
1 234789 HpCDF
OCDF
TCOO (total)
PaCDD (total)
HxCDD (total)
HpCDD (total)
TCDF (total)
PiGDF (total)
HxCDF (to&J)
HpCDF (total)
Total doxins (by isomer) indudng NOs
TotaJ furans (by Isomar) inducing NO*
TotaJ dcodns/furans (by isomar) inc NDs
Total doxins (by isomar) axcludng NOs
Total furans (by Isomar) axdudng NDs
TotaJ doxins/furans (by Isomar) ax. NDs
"St
ng/L
ng/L
ngO.
ng/L
ng/L
ngA.
ng/L
ng^L
ng/L
ngl
ng/L
ng/L
ngA,
ng/L
ng/L
ngfl.
ng/L
ng/L
ng/L
ng/L
ng/L
ng/L
ng/L
ng/L
ng/L
ng/L
ng/L
ng/L
ng/L
ng/L
NO 0.02
NO 0.03
NO 0.04
NO 0.03
ND 0.04
NO 0.04
F 0.06
ND 0.02
NO 0.01
ND 0.02
NO 0.04
NO 0.04
ND 0.03
ND 0.04
ND 0.10
ND 0.04
ND 0.06
NO 0.35
ND 0.4S
ND 0.33
ND 0.08
0.01
ND 0.39
ND 0.61
ND 0.27
< Q3A
ND 0.39
< 0.63
> 0.08
ail ND
> o.oe
NO 0.07
NO O.O5
ND 0.01
NO 0.02
ND 0.03
ND 0.03
6.19
ND 0.03
NO 0.07
NO O.OS
ND 0.04
ND 0.09
ND O.OS
ND 0.02
0.05
ND 0.32
O.OS
NO 1.61
ND 0.71
ND 0.20
0.03
0.03
ND 1.55
ND 0.63
O.OS
< 0.40
< 0.43
< O.S3
> 0.1S
> 0.1G
> 0.2S
NO 0.01
ND 0.01
ND 0.003
ND 0.001
ND 0.002
ND 0.01
F 0.04
ND 0.01
ND 0.01
ND 0.01
ND 0.003
ND 0.002
ND 0.01
ND 0.002
ND 0.004
ND 0.001
ND 0.01
0.03
ND 0.08
ND O.OS!
0.004
ND 0.26
ND 0.29
ND O.C6
ND 0.01
< 0.07
ND O.CKS
< 0.13
> 0.04
«J NO
> 0.04
A2-38
-------
TABLE A2-12. SS13 - SCRUBBER DECANT WATER
(continued)
Substance
Units
Condition 1
Waste water
Flag Composite
Condition 2
Soil
Flag Composite
Conditions
Waste oil
Flag Composite
Tree* metals
Vol
Vci
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Beryllium
Cadmium
Chromium (Total)
Copper
Load
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Phosphorus
Selenium
Silver
Thallium
Tin
Zinc
pgn.
ug/L
ug/L
ugA.
ugA.
ugA-
ugA-
ugfl-
ugA.
ugA.
ugA.
ug/L
ugA.
ugA.
ugA.
no".
ugA.
•til* organic compounds
Vinyl chloride
Methyl chloride
Trans- 1 ,2-o5chloro«8i«ne
Cis-1,2-dichloroethene
Chloroform
1.1.1 • Trichtoroemane
Carbon tetrachteride
Benzene
1 ,2 • Dichloroettiane
Trichtoroethene
Tolueno
1,1.2-Triehloroethane
Tetrachloroethene
1 2. • Dibromoethane
Chlorobenzene
Ethylbenzene
M-/P-Xylene
O-Xytone
1 ,3 - Dichlorobenzene
1 .4 - Dichlorobenzene
1 ,2 - Dichlorobenzene
•HI* organic compounds
Vinyl chloride
Methyl chloride
Trans- 1,2-dtehloroethens
Cis-1,2-
-------
TABLE A2-12. SS13 - SCRUBBER DECANT WATER
(continued)
Substance
Volatile organic compound*
Vinyl chloride
Methyl chloride
Trsns-1 ,2-dtehloroethene
Cla-1 .2-dchloroethen9
Chloroform
1,1,1 - Trichtoroethane
Carbon tetrachloride
Benzene
1.2-D!chloroethan«
Trichloroethena
Toluene
1.1,2-Trictitoroathana
1 £. • Oibromoethan*
Chtofobeozon*
Ethylbonzan*
M-/P-Xyten«
O-Xytonc
1 .3 - Dtctikxobtfozan*
1.4 - Olchkxob«nzen«
1.2 - D!chlorobenz*n«
Mlac«llan*ous
Units
32.8
18.4
1400
0.08
< 0.01
< 0.01
NO 0.01
Total organic carbon
Organic halogens (as chloride)
Inorganic halogens (as chloride)
Chriorine
Fluorine
Phosphate
Hexavalent chromium
Ph'
rslcal characteristics
Density
PH
Ultimate analysis
Carbon
Hydrogen
Nitrogen
Total sulfur (as S)
Oxygen
A2-40
-------
TABLE A2-13. SS14 - REFORMED GAS SUMMARY
Substance
T<
P
C
Units
Condition 1 - Waste water 1
Flag Run 1| Flag Run 2 1 Flag Run3J
stal stream flow rate
.
Ib/hr
kg/hr
dscm/hr
232
10.5
14.0
182
8.26
12.0
15.51
7.03
8.781
Blychtorinated blphenyls (PC8)
Monochlorobiphanyl (total)
Dichtorobiphenyl (total)
Trichtorobiphenyl (total)
Tetrachlorobiphenyl (total)
Pentachlorobiphenyl (total)
Hexachlorobiphenyl (total)
Heptachlorobiphenyl (total)
Octachlorobiphanyl (total)
Nonachlorobiphenyl (total)
Decachlorobiphenyl (total)
Total PCBs (Tri-Deca) in NOs
Total PCBs (Mono-Deca) in NOs
Total PCBs (Tri-Deca) ex NO*
Total PCBs (Mono-Oeca) ex NOs
ng/dscm
ng/dscm
ng/dsem
ng/dscfn
ng/dscm
ng/dscm
u.g/dscm
ng/dscm
p.g/dsom
ng/dscm
(ig/dscm
Hudson
(tg/dscm
M.gydscm
NO 0.02
NO 0.02
NO 0.04
NO 0.05
NO 0.07
NO 0.05
NO 0.05
NO 0.04
NO 0.05
NO 023
< 0.56
< 0.60
all NO
all NO
0.87
2.61
1.99
27 0.34
27 EMPC 1.34
NO 0.03
NO 0.03
NO 0.03
NO 0.04
NO 0.14
< 3.95
< 7.42
> 3.67
> 7.15
NO 0.003
EMPC O.OB
NO 0.01
EMPC 0.04
EMPC 025
NO 0.01
ND 0.01
EMPC 0.04
EMPC 0.05
NO 0.03
< 0.42
< O.SO
> 0.38
> 0.46
ilorobanzene* and chloropnenols
1 ,2 Dichlorobenzene
1,3 • Dtahtorobonzene
1 .4 • Dichlorobenzene
2,3 - Pfchkxophenol
1 2.3 - Trichlorobenzene
t ,2,4 - Trichkxobenzena
1 .3,5 - Trichtofobenzena
1 ,2.3,4°Tetrachlorobenzene
1 2.3.5-Tatrachlorobenzenc
1 2.4,5 • Tetrachlorobanzana
Pantachlorobenzana
Hexaehlorobenzene
2. - Chlorophanol
3,4 • Chtorophenol
2,4 - Dichlorophenol
2,5 - Dichlorophenol
2.6 - Dichlofophenol
3,4 - Dichlorophenol
3,5 • Dichlorophenol
2,3.4 - Trichtorophenol
2,3,5 • Trichtorophehol
2,3.6 - Trichkxophenol
2,4.5- Trichtorophenol
2.4,6- Trichkxophenol
2,3,4.5 - Tetrachtorophenol
2,3,5,6 • Tetrachtofophanol
Pentachlorophenol
Total chlorobenzene*
Total chtorophBoota
(ig/dscm
Hg/dscm
(tg/dscm
(ig/dscm
(tg/dsom
ng/dsem
^g/dscm
ng/dscm
H9/ds«Ti
^g/dscm
(ig/dscm
ng/dscm
)ig/dscm
(lo/dscm
(tg/dscm
^o/dscm
Itg/dscm
ng/d»em
^g/dscm
(ig^dscnn
^g/dscm
Kig/dscm
l^g/dscm
(ig/dsan
(tglUscm
H9/dscm
licydscm
ng/d«cm
(tg/dscm
NO 49.4
NO 51.8
NO 47.7
NO 58.0
NO 452
NO 46.1
NO 47.3
NO 252
NA
NO 19.9
NO 23.9
NO 30.6
NO 642
NO 24.3
NO 65.6
NO 58.5
NO 54.1
NO 35.9
NO 32.8
NO 42.6
NO 492
NO 40.5
NO 412
NO 43.7
NO 39.3
NO 46.8
NO 54.1
NO 387
NO 751
NO 43.3
NO 45.3
NO 41.8
NO 61.7
NO 48.1
NO 49.0
NO 50.4
NO 27.9
NA
NO 42.4
NO 28.2
NO 37.9
NO 562
NO 42.6
NO 69.8
NO 59.0
NO 57.5
NO 39.8
NO 36.3
NO 47.1
NO 54.4
NO 44.8
NO 48.8
NO 51.7
NO 43.5
NO 51.8
NO 66.9
NO 414
NO 832
NO 14.4
. ND 14.9
ND 13.9
ND 242
ND 17.8
NO 17.1
NO 17.1
ND 15.7
NA
NO 6.75
NO 8.35
ND 8.81
ND 18.3
ND 7:17
NO 22.7
NO 20.9
NO 20.8
ND 112
ND 15.1
ND 18.7
ND 14.6
ND 11.7
ND 14.5
NO 15.1
NO 14..9
NO 16.5
ND 18.5
NO 135
NO 253
A2-41
-------
TABLE A2-13. SS14 • REFORMED GAS SUMMARY
(continued)
Substance
Units
Conditionl • Waste water ~|
Flag ; Run 1| Flag Run2|Flag Run3|
Dfoxina and furan*
2378 TCOD
12378 PeCDD
123478 HxCOO
123678 HxCOD
123789 HxCOD
1234878 HpCDD
OCDO
2378 TCOF
12378 PeCDF
23478 PeCDF
123478 HxCDF
123678 HXCDF
234678 HxCDF
123789 HxCDF
1 234878 HpCDF
1234789 HpCDF
OCDF
TCOD (total)
PeCDD (total)
HxCDD (total)
HpCOD (total)
TCOF (total)
PeCDF (total)
HxCDF (total)
HpCOF (total)
Total doxlns (by isomer) including NDi
Total furans (by isomer) including NDa
Total doxlns/furans (by Isomer) inc NDs
Total doxlns (by Isomer) excluding NDs
Total furans (by Isomer) excluding NDs
Total doxins/Turans (by Isomer) ex. NDs
ng/dscm
ng/dscm
ng/dscm
ng/dscm
ng/dscm
ng/dscm
ng/dscm
ng/dscm
ng/dscm
ng/dscm
ng/dscm
ng/dscm
ng/dscm
ng/dscm
ng/dscm
ng/dscm
ng/dscm
ng/dscm
ng/dscm
ng/dscm
ng/dscm
ng/dscm
ng/dscm
ng/dscm
ng/dscm
ng/dscm
ng/dscm
ng/dscm
ng/dscm
ng/dsem
ng/dscm
, ND 0.004
ND 0.006
, ND 0.01
ND O.Ot
ND 0.01
: B 0.03
26 : B 0.31
B 0.01
; ND 0.004
ND 0.004
ND 0.03
NO 0.02
0.06
ND 0.04
NO 0.02
NO 0.02
NO 0.01
NO 0.004
NO 0.006
ND 0.01
0.05
0.01
, NO 0.004
0.06
< 0.37
< 0.37
: < 0.21
< 0.59
> 0.34
> 0.07
> 0.41
Volatile or gnnte compounds
Vkiyl chloride
Mothyl chloride
Trans- 1 ,2-cSchloroethene
Cis-1.2-cichloroethene
Chloroform
1.1.1-Trichtoroetiiane
Carbon tetrachkxide
Banzon*
1.2-Dlchkxoelhane
Trichloroethene
Toluen*
1,1.2- Trichtoroetnane
Tetrachloroethen*
1.2 • Dibromoetharw
Chlorobenzen*
Ethyltjenzen*
M-/P-Xylen«
O-Xyten«
1 .3 - Dlchlorobenzen*
1,4 - Dtehlorobenzen*
1 ,2 • Dichtorobenzen*
jig/dscm
jic/dscm
ng/dscm
figAteem
fig/dscm
ng/dscm
jig/dscm
Hgtescm
jig/dson
mj/dscm
ligttscm
ticydsom
lig/dscm
ng/dscm
ng/dscm
ng/dscm
ng/dscm
ng/dscm
ng/dscm
ngMscm
ng/dscm
8(1,2,3) NO 1.94
8(1,2.3) ND 1.94
8(1,2.3) ND 1.94
8(1,2.3) NO 1.94
8(1,2,3) i NO 1.94
8(1,2.3) NO 1.94
8(1.2.3) NO 1.94
8(1,2,3) ALR 2330
8(1.2,3) NO 1.94
8(1,2,3) NO 1.94
8(1,2.3) NO 1.94
8(1,2,3) ! NO 1.94
8(1,2,3) NO 1.94
8(1,2.3) NO 1.94
8(1,2,3) ND 1.94
8(142.3) NO 1.94
8(1.2.3) NO 3.88
8(1,2.3) NO 1.94
8(1,2.3) NO 1.94
8(1,2,3) ND 1.94
8(1.2.3) NO 1.94
ND 0.003
ND 0.003
NO 0.01
0.01
0.03
B 0.07
26 B 0.32
0.06
ND 0.01
NO 0.01
NO 0.11
ND 0.07
B 0.18
NO 0.14
NO 0.07
NO 0.14
0.01
0.003
NO 0.003
0.17
Q 0.13
0.2S
O.OS
0.13
< 0.44
< 0.44
< 0.80
< 1.24
» 0.43
> 0.2S
» 0.68
< 8.47
NO 8.93
NO 8.93
NO 8.93
NO 8.93
NO 8.93
NO 8.93
SAT 12400
NO 8.93
ND 8.93
< 3070
NO 8.93
NO . 8.93
NO 8.93
< 83.8
< 71.6
< 51.9
< 44.5
< 8.39
< 9.08
< 8.39
ND 0.001
EMPC 0.003
0.01
0.01
0.01
O.OS
26 0.19
0.06
0.04
0.09
0.28
0.06
0.29
2.35
0.12
0.07
0.03
EMPC 0.002
0.01
0.09
0.138
Q G.20
Q 0.53
0.135
< 0.28
< 0.28
< 3.40
< 3.68
» 0.27
-
> 0.27
"1 NO 2.04
"1 ND 2.04
~1 ND 2.04
"1 ND 2.04
~1 ND 2.04
°*1 NO 2.04
"1 ND 2.04
"1 1550000
-1 NO 2.04
-1 « 78.8
~1 32800
-1 « S.73
"1 « 1S.8
-1 ND 2.04
- ' • 324
473
278
~ ND 2.04
" ND 2.04
~ ND 2.04
- NO 2.04
A2-42
-------
TABLE A2-13. SS14 - REFORMED GAS SUMMARY
(continued)
Substance
S
Fl
H
M
Units
Condition 1 - Waste water I
Flag Run1|Flag Run2|Flag Run3|
ulfur compounds
Hydrogen sulfide
Carbony) sulfide
Methyl mercaptan
Ethyl marcaptan
Olmothyl sulfide
Carbon sulfide
N-Propylmercaptan
Dimethyl disulfide
ppbv
ppbv
ppbv
ppbv
ppbv
ppbv
ppbv
ppbv
45800
NO 92.0
NO 92.0
NO 92.0
NO 92.0
92.8
NO 92.0
NO 46.0
7690
537
NO 43.0
NO 43.0
NO 43.0
50.6
NO 43.0
NO 21. S
NO 4.8
61.13
NO 4.9
NO 4.8
NO 4.8
8.07
10J2
NO 3.61
xcd ga*«*
Hydrogen
Oxygen
Nitrogen
Methana
Carbon monoxide
Carbon dioxide
vol. %
vol.%
vot.%
vol. %
vo».%
vol. %
42.1
0.07
28.9
11.7
6.45
33 8.98
46.6
0.05
28.7
10.8
4.51
33 8.49
34.6
0.03
43.5
14.0
4.46
33 2.53
ydroc*rbon* .
C1 Hydrocarbons
C2 Hydrocarbon*
C3 Hydrocarbon*
C4 Hydrocarbon*
C5 Hydrocarbons
OS Hydrocarbons
•cdlaneous
Heating value
Moisture
ppmv
ppmv
ppmv
ppmv
ppmv
ppmv
Btu/lb
vol. %
134483
3931
398
6
8
4
6320
122581
4086
6
5
6
4
6640
17.0
159036
3880
365
6
17108
37
5840
' i.eo
Note: "1 refer* to flag* 8(4).12(2.3).13(1,2.4).14(2.3) "2 refers to
flags 1S<1,2,3.4),16(1,2,3,4),17(4) -3 refers to flags
1S(1,2,3,4),44<1,2,3,4) "4 refer* to flag* 8(2),10(2).15(2),16{2).18(1)
°*5 refer* to flag* 8<2.4),11(1.3),10(2.4),13(2),14(4).15(2,4) ~8
refers to flag* 10(1,2.3).8<112.3).16<2).1
A2-43
-------
TABLE A2-13. SS14 - REFORMED GAS SUMMARY
(continued)
Subs tan c*
fi
P
C
Units
Condition 2 - Soil
Flag : Run 1| Flag Run 2
3UI »tr««m flow rate
Ib/hr
kg/hr
dscm/hr
; 16.4
7.44
13.3
7.40
3.33
6.1S
Dlycnlorlnatw* Wph«nyls (PCS)
Monochtorobiphenyl (total)
Dlchkxobiphanyl (total)
TrSchtorobiphanyl (total)
T«tracWorobipheny1 (total)
Pontachlorobiphaflyl (total)
Hoxachlorobiphenyi (total)
Heptachlorobiphonyl (total)
Octachtorobiphenyl (total)
Nonachlorobiphenyl (total)
Decacnlorobiphenyl (total)
Total RGBs (Tri-Deca) in NO*
Total PCBs (Mono-Dec*) in NDs
Total PCB» (Tri-Deca) ex ND«
Total PCBs (Mono-Doca) ox N0»
ng/dacm
(ig/dscm
jig/dscm
ng'dscm
jig/dscm
(ig/dtcm
(ig/dsem
\ig/dtcm
(ig^dscm
jig/d»cm
lig/dacm
)ig/d«em
(lo/dscm
^ig/dson
0.08
0.10
0.26
! 0.31
EMPC 0.14
NO 0.06
NO : 0.06
NO ' 0.06
NO 0.03
NO 0.17
< : 1.08
< 1.26
> i 0.71
> 0.89
0.13
0.18
0.43
0.80
NO 0.05
NO 0.02
NO 0.02
NO 0.02
NO 0.02
NO 0.09
< 1.49
< 1.78
> 1.28
> 1.67
ilorobanzone* and chlor oph«nol»
1,2 Dichtofobsnzsne
1.3 - Oichlorobenzono
1,4 • Olchlorob«nzarw
2.3 • Dfchlofoptwnol
1 ,2,3 - Trichkxobenzena
1 .2,4 - Trichkxoboozefi*
1 ,3,5 - Trtchtorobanzen*
1 ,2,3.4-Tetrachlorobenzen*
1 ,2,3,5-TetrachIorob«nzen«
1 ,2,4,5 • T0traehtorob«nz«n«
Pontachkxobenzen*
Haxachlorobsnzon*
2 • Chlorophenol
3,4 • Chtorophoool
2.4 - Dtchkxophonol
2,5 - Dfchloroph«nol
2,6 - Otehlorophenol
3,4 - Dtehlofophanol
3,5 • Dtehtorophanol
2.3.4 - Trichkxoptwnol
2,3.5 -Trichloropnonol
2,3,6 - TrichkxopnonoJ
2.4,5 -Trichkxoptwnol
2,4.6 -Trichkxophanot
2.3.4.5 - Totrachkxophanot
2.3.5.6 • TotracttoroptMnol
Pantachlorophanol
Total chk5robonz»fW«
Total chk>roph*noJs
HS/dsem
ja^dscm
1±g/<$*cfn
|ioXdsc?n
H9/d»cni
ng/dscm
ngWton
^9/dscm
(ig/d*cm
na'cbcm
HS^d»cm
jig/dtem
li^ytcm
(igMscm
Hg'dscm
Hudson
jig/dscm
li^dscm
H9/d8«n
ngi^scm
^9/dscm
jtg/dsem
(igMson
(to/dscm
lio/dscm
(ig^sctn
ligtisctn
^o/dictn
tigWtcm
NO 7.39
NO : 7.04
NO 7.19
NO 14.6
NO 10.6
NO 9.86
NO : 10.0
NO 6.52
NO 7.19
NO 6.73
NO 4.96
NO 4.05
NO 7.44
NO , 3.61
NO 11.3
NO 11.5
NO 11.1
NO : 8.25
NO 7.91
NO 10.8
NO 10.4
NO 10.1
NO 9.88
NO 10.3
NO 8.00
• NO : 8.29
NO [ 8.68
NO 74.19
NO 152.02
NO 13.7
NO 13.6
NO 13.9
NO 12.8
NO 9.73
NO 9.01
NO 8.76
NO 12.0
NO 7.02
NO 5.93
NO 10.40
NO 7.75
NO 13.8
NO 6.60
NO 10.9
NO 9.M
NO 10.3
ND 13.8
NO 14.1
NO 19.4
NO 18.0
NO 19.6
NO 18.3
NO 19.1
NO 14.5
NO 162
NO 17.10
NO 98.10
ND 234.3
A2-44
-------
TABLE A2-13. SS14 - REFORMED GAS SUMMARY
(continued)
Substance
Units
Condition 2 - Soil
Flag Run 1 1Flag Run'2
Dioidn* and furana
2378 TCOD
12378PoCDD
123478 HxCDO
123678 HxCOO
123789 HxCDD
1 234678 HpCDD
OCOO
2378 TCOF
12378 P«CDF
23478 PoCDF
123478 HxCOF
123678 HXCDF
234678 HxCOF
123789 HxCOF
1234678 HpCDF
1234789 HpCDF
OCDF
TCOO (total)
PoCDD (total)
HxCOO (total)
HpCOO (total)
TCDF (total)
PoCDF (total)
HxCDF (total)
HpCDF (total)
Total dioxins (by isoroer) including NO*
Total furan* (by isomw) including NO*
Total doxins/furans (by isonw) inc NO*
Total dioxins (by isomor) exdudng NO*
Total furana (by isomw) excluding NO*
Total dioxins/furarts (by isomar) «x. NO*
Volatile organic compounds
Vinyl chloride
Mothyl chtoricto
Trims- 1 ,2-dtehloroathon*)
Cis-1 ,2-dichloro0th«rw
Chloroform
1.1.1-Trlchtefoattwiw
Carbon tetrachkxide
Btnzofto
1.2-Dichloro«thar»
Trichloro«then0
Toluene
1.1,2-Trichloroethane
Totrachloroetherta
1 % • Oibromoetftone
Cnlorobenzene
EHiylbenzene
M-/P-Xytone
O-Xytone
1 .3 - Dichlorobenzene
1 .4 • DichlorobenzerM
1.2- Dichlorobenzene
ng/dscm
ng/dscm
ng/dscm
ng/dscm
ng/dscm
ng/dscm
ng/dscm
ng/dscm
ng/dscm
ng/dscm
ng/dscm
ng/dscm
ng/dscm
ng/dsem
ng/dsem
ng/dscm
ng/dscm
ng/dscm
ng/dscm
.ng/dscm
ng/dscm
ng/d*cm
ng/dscm
ng/d*cm
ng/dscm
ng/dscm
ng/dscm
ng/dscm
ng/dscm
ng/dscm
ng/dscm
ng/dscm
ng/dsem
(xgAdscm
ng/dscm
ng/dscm
ng/dscm
ng/dscm
ngfcfecm
ng/dsem
ng/dscm
ng/dscm
ng/dscm
ng/dscm
ng/dscm
ng/dscm
ng/dscm
ng/dscm
ng/dscm
ng/dscm
ng/dscm
ng/d*cm
NO 0.003
NO 0.01
NO 0.01
NO 0.01
ND 0.01
0.04
26 B 0.39
NO 0.002
NO 0.003
NO 0.003
NO 0.02
NO 0.02
NO 0.02
ND 0.03
ND 0.03
NO 0.06
0.08
ND 0.003
NO 0.01
0.03
0.08
NO 0.002
ND 0.003
NO 0.02
ND 0.03
< 0.470
< 0.261
< 0.731
> 0.340
> 0.060
> 0.400
"2 INT
"2 INT
**2 INT
"2 INT
**2 INT
"2 INT
"2 INT
~2 SAT
"2 INT
**2 INT
**2 < 1S900
"2 NO 2.09
**2 < 199
**2 ND 2.09
"2 < 7.30
"2 < 12.6
"2 ND 4.19
"2 ND 2,09
"2 NO 2.09
**2 NO 2.09
**2 ND 2.09
NO 0.004
NO 0.01
NO 0.02
NO 0.01
ND 0.02
0.02
26.29 3 0.12
0.03
EMPC/PR 0.01
0.02
EMPC 0.15
NOAJ 0.07
0.27
ND/U 0.12
EMPC 0.04
0.08
0.01
NO 0.004
EMPC 0.05
' 0.02
0.02
0.04
0.04
Q 0.32
Q 0.06
< 0.20
< 0.81
< 1.01
> 0.14
> 0.80
> 0.94
"3 < 333
**3 < 266
~3 ND 2.08
"3 NO 2.08
~3 ND 2.08
~3 INT
"3 INT
~3 SAT
~3 INT
"3 NO 2,08
~3 159000
"3 ND 2.08
"3 59.7
°*3 NO 2.08
**3 ND 2.08
**3 69^2
~3 < 23.2
~3 < 13.2
"3 ND 2.08
"3 ND 2.08
"3 ND 2.08
A2-45
-------
TABLE A2-13. SS14 •• REFORMED GAS SUMMARY
(continued)
Substance
S
H
H
M
Units
Condition 2 • Soil
Flag Run 1 1 Flag Run 2
ulfur compounds
Hydrogen aulfide
Carbonyl sulflcte
Methyl mercaptan
Ethyl mercaptan
Dimethyl sulflde
Carbon sulflde
N-Propylmereaptan
Dimethyl dfoulflde
ppbv
ppbv
ppbv
ppbv
ppbv
ppbv
ppbv
PPbv
NO 4.9
119.3
NO 4.90
NO 4.90
NO 4.90
23
NO ' 4.90
ND 2.50
ND 4.49
37.9
ND 4.49
ND 4.49
ND 4.49
ND 4.49
ND 4.49
ND 2.25
xed gaaa«
Hydrogen
Oxygen
Nitrogen
Methane
Carbon monoxide
Carbon dioxide
vol.%
vol. %
vol.%
vd.%
vol.%
vol.%
67.4
0.02
18.3
7.37
2.95
33 3.32
62.3
0.01
25.0
6.89
3.73
33 1.81
ydrocartaona
C1 Hydrocarbons
C2 Hydrocarbons
C3 Hydrocarbons
C4 Hydrocarbons
CS Hydrocarbons
C8 Hydrocarbons
scelianeoua
Heating value
Moisture
ppmv
ppmv
ppmv
ppmv
ppmv
ppmv
84321
1096
74
': 4
: 46
3
67416
392
17
1
42
21
!
Btu/lb
vol.%
11520
2.11
9600
1.81
Note: "1 refers to flags
8(4).12<2,3).13(1,2,4).14<2,3) *"2 refers to flag»
15<1 A3.4),16{1 A3.4).17(4) "3 refers to flags
1 5(1 ,2,3,4),44{1 ,2,3,4) "4 refers to flags
8<2).10(2)I15(2),16(2),18(1) "5 refers to flags
refero to flags 10(1,2.3),8{1.2.3).ie<2).141.2,3)
A2-43
-------
TABLE A2-13. SS14 - REFORMED GAS SUMMARY
(continued)
Substance
T
P
otal *tro*m flow rat*
Units
Ib/hr
kg/hr
dscm/hr
Condition 3 - Waste oil |
Flag Run1|Flag Run2|Flag Run3|
•
32.9
14.9
27.4
33.6
152
31.7
olycDilorlnated blphonyl* (PCS) '
Monochlorobiphanyl (total)
Dichtorobiphenyl (total)
Trichtorobiphenyl (total)
Tatrachlorobiphonyl (total)
Pontachlorobiphanyl (total)
Hexachlorobiphanyl (total)
Haptachlorobiphanyl (total)
Octachlorobiphanyl (total)
Nonachlorobiphonyl (total)
Daeachlorobiphenyl (total)
Total PCBs (Tri-Doca) in ND»
Total PCBs (Mono-Daca) in NDs
Total PCBs (Tri-Doca) ax NOs
Total PCBs (Mono-Doca) ax NDs
lig/dscm
ng/dscm
ng/dscm
(io/dscm
ng/dscm
ng/dscm
ng/dscm
(ig/dscm
H9/dscm
ng/dscm
lig/dscm
ilorobonzanM and chloroph»nol»
1 .2 Dichlorobonzana
1.3-Oichlorobenzene
1,4 - Dichtorobanzena
2.3 - Dichlorophanol
1 ,2,3 - Trichlorobenzana
1 .2.4 - Trichkxobonzena
1.3.S - Trichlorobenzana
1 ,2.3,4-Tetrachlorobanzene
1 ,2,3.5-Tatrachlorobanzana
1,2,4.5 - Tatrachlorobenzenc
Pentachlorobanzene
Haxachlorobenzene
2 • Chlorophanol
3.4 - Chlorophanol
2.4 - Dichlorophanol
2,5 - Dichlorophanol
2,6 - Dichlorophanol
3,4 - Dichlorophanol
3.5 - Dichlorophanol
2,3,4 • Trichlorophanol
2.3,5 - Trichlorophanol
2,3.6 - Trichlorophanol
2,4.5 - Trichlorophanol
2.4,6 -Trichlorophanol
2.3.4.5 - Tatrachloroprtanoi
2,3,5,6 - Tatrachlorophanot
Pantaehlorophanol
Total chlorobanzanM
Total chlorophanoit •
Hg/dscm
jig/dscm
Hudson
ng/dscm
ng/dscm
pg/dscm
nJ'dscm
jtj'dscm
H9/d*cm
(ig/dscm
(tg/dscm
(ig/dscm
lig/dscm
>ig/dscm
jig/clscm
tigttscm
|ig/dscm
(ig/dscm
0.22
2.67
0.36
EMPC 1.44
NO 0.14
NO 0.07
NO 0.07
NO 0.07
NO 0.06
NO 0.29
< 2.51
< 5.40
> 1.80
> 4.69
1.48
11.1
40.6
29.2
7.70
0.38
ND 0.07
ND 0.07
ND 0.07
ND 0.31
< 78.3
< 90.9
> 77.9
> 90.5
42.7
19.4
41.7
.
ND 0.01
NO 0.02
EMPC 0.04
NO 0.04
EMPC 0.91
ND 0.03
ND 0.03
EMPC 0.14
EMPC 0.21
ND 0.14
< 1.54
< 1.57
> 1.30
> 1.30
NO 3.25
NO 3.11
NO 3.15
NO 2.02
NO 1.83
NO 1.69
NO 1.68
NO 2.77
NA
NO 0.80
NO 2.82
NO 3.16
NO 3.42
NO 0.40
NO 1.68
NO 2.12
NO 0.76
NO 3.06
ND 1.29
NO 4.00
ND 4.37
NO 3.89
ND 3.51
NO 3.93
ND 3.11
ND 5.01
ND 7.20
NO 24.3
NO 49.8
ND 1.70
o NO 1.63
ND 1.65
NO 1.04
NO 0.95
NO 0.87
NO 0.87
NO 1.54
NA
NO 0.41
ND 1.57
ND 17.02
NO 1.79
NO 021
NO 0.87
NO 1.09
ND 0.39
ND 1.70
NO 0.72
ND 223
NO 2.43
NO 2.16
NO 1.95
NO 2.18
ND 1.73
NO 2.78
NO 3.88
NO 28.2
ND 27.2
ND 0.44
ND 0.41
NO 0.42
NO CI.39
NO 0.36
NO CI.33
NO CI.32
ND 0.41
NA
NO 0.31
NO 0.42
ND 0.57
NO 0.46
ND 0.08
ND 0.33
ND 0.41
NO 0.15
NO 0.46
ND 0.19
ND 0.60
ND 0.65
NO 0.58
NO 0.52
NO 0.58
NO 0.46
ND 0.74
NO '1 .30
NO 4.00
ND 7.89
A2-47
-------
TABLE A2-13. SS14 - REFORMED GAS SUMMARY
(continued)
Substance
Hariri* and furans)
V
2378 TCDO
12378 PeCDD
123478 HxCD'D
123678 HxCDD
123789 HxCDD
1234678 HpCOO
OCDD
2378 TCDF
12378 PeCOF
23478 PeCDF
123478 HxCDF '
123678 HXCDF
234678 HxCDF
123789 HxCDF
1234878 HpCDF
1234789 HpCDF
OCDF
TCDD (total)
PeCDD (total)
HxCDD (total)
HpCDD (total)
TCDF (total)
PeCDF (total)
HxCDF (total)
HpCDF (total) ....
Total doxins (by isomar) inducing NDs
Total furana (by isomar) including NDs
Total tf oxins/Turans (by isomar) ine NDs
Total doxins (by isomar) excluding NDs
Total furans (by isomar) excluding NDs
Total doxins/furant (by isomer) ex. NDs
aUttle organic compound*
Vinyl chloride
Methyl chloride
Trans-1 5-dtohloroethene
CIf1.2-d!chtoroethene
Chloroform
1.1,1-Trichtoroethane
Carbon tetrachhxide
Benzene ,
1 5 - Dfehloroetiiane
Trichtoroethene
Toluene
1 ,1 .2 - Trichkxoethane
Tetrachloroeftene
1,2-Dibromoethane
Chtorobenzene
Ethylbenzene
M-/P-Xylen«
O-Xytone
1.3 - Dichlorobenzene
1 .4 • Dichlorobenzene
15- Dtehtofebenzene
Units I
=laq RunllFlag Run2IFIag Hun3|
ng/dscm
ng/dscm
ng/dsem
ng/dscm
ng/dscm
ng/dscm
ng/dscm
ng/dscm
ng/dscm
ng/dscm
ng/dscm
ng/dscm
ng/dscm
ng/dscm
ng/dscm
ng/dscm
ng/dscm
ng/dscm
ng/dsem
ng/dsem
ng/dscm
ng/dscm
ng/dscm
ng/dscm
ng/dscm
ng/dscm
ng/dscm
ng/dsem
ng/dscm
ng/dscm
ng/dscm
ng/dscm
ng/dscm
ng/dscm
ng/dsem
ng/dscm
ng/dsem
ng/dscm
ng/dscm
ng/dscm
ng/dscm
ng/dscm
ng/dscm
ng/dscm
ng/dsem
ng/dsem
ng/dscm
ng/dscm
ng/dscm
ND 0.004
ND 0.01
ND 0.01
ND 0.01
ND 0.01
EMPC/B 0.03
26 B. 0.30
0.03
0.01
0.02
EMPC 0.06
EMPC 0.02
B 0.05
ND 0.01
0.04
ND 0.01
ND 0.01
ND 0.004
ND 0.01
ND 0.01
EMRC 0.06
0.07
0.12
'• 0.06
0.07
< 0.36
< 0.27
< 0.64
> 0.33
> 053
> 0.56
"4 ND 457
"4 ND 451
-4 ND 451
**4 NO 451
~4 ND 451
~4 NO 451
"4 ND 4.21
~4 1760000
~4 ND 451
~4 ND 451
-4 58900
-4 48.3
"4 ' 303C
-4 ND 451
-4 320C
~4 i 547C
-4 SK
-4 ND 451
"4 32.(
"4 ND 451
-4 39.I
ND 0.001
ND 0.002
ND 0.003
NO 0.002
NO 0.003
EMPC/B 0.02
26 8 0.02
0.002
EMPC 0.091
EMPC 0.002
ND 0.007
ND 0.003
0.01
ND 0.01
ND 0.00
ND 0.01
ND 0.003
ND 0.001
ND 0.002
ND 0.003
EMPC 0.034
0.002
EMPC 0.603
0.01
ND 0.003
< 0.05
< 0.05
< 0.10
> 0.04
> 0.01
> 0.05
"5 Nb 2.08
-S ND 2.08
-S ND 2.08
-S ND 2.08
-5 <« 8.34
"5 ND a.08
°-S ND 2.08
"S 2860000
-S ND 2.08
"5 113000
»S ND 2.08
"S NO 2.08
-5 ND 2.0«
"5 203C
~5 217(
-S 291
••S < 44.1
"5 < 5.5!
"S < 20.1
*"5 < 1S.<
ND 0.002
ND 0.002
ND 0.004
EMPC 0.003
PR 0.004
0.04
26 B 0.27
0.002
0.003
0.01
EMPC 0.004
ND 0.01
O.Ol
ND 0.01
EMPC 0.01
Q 6.005
Q 0.004
0.01
0.06
Q 0.03
Q 0.01
0.02
< 0.32
< 0.11
< 0.43
> 0.32
> 0.07
> 0.39
**8 101000
"6 < 343
"6 ND 2.17
-6 NO 2.17
"6 « 3S.4
"8 ND 2.17
«*6 ND 2.17
"8 724000
**6 ND 2.17
-8 54.5
-8 38000
"8 ND 2.17
-8 4410
"S ND 2.17
-8 1120
**8 1210
«8 283
~6 ND 2.17
-8 < 11.9
6 < 1 4.5
**6 < 1 0.2
A2-48
-------
TABLE A2-13. SS14 - REFORMED GAS SUMMARY
(continued) ;
Substance
s
H
H
M
Units
Condition 3 - Waste oil
Flag Run 1| Flag Run 2 (Flag Run 3
ulfiir compounds .
Hydrogen sulfide
Cfflrbonyi sulflde
Mothyi mercaptan
Ethyl mercaptan
Dimethyl sulfide .
Carbon sulfide
N-Propylmarcaptan
Dimethyl bisulfide
ppbv
ppbv
ppbv
ppbv
ppbv
PPbv
PPbv
PPbv
S1400
1650
74.7
20.6
NO 4.21
1280
NO 4.21
7.89
41900
1890
114
NO 82.5
NO 82.5
1007
NO 82.5
NO 41.2
111900
2540
NO 41.2
NO 41.2
NO 41.2
489
NO 41.2
NO 41.2
xed gas** , ,
Hydrogen
Oxygen
Nitrogen
Mothane
Carbon monoxide
Carbon dioxide
vol. %
vol.%
vol.%
voJ.%
vol.%
vol.%
50.4
0.06
20.5
18.1
5.68
33 2.63
rdrocarfoon*
C1 Hydrocarbon*
C2 Hydrocarbon «
C3 Hydrocarbons
C4 Hydrocarbons
CS Hydrocarbons
C6 Hydrocarbons
scrilanoou*
Heating value
Moisture
ppmv
ppmv
ppmv
ppmv
ppmv
ppmv
206316
7495
700
57
2621
1
54.6
0.06
12.5
22.0
5.65
33 3.29
61.9
0.06
8.12
10.7
12.69
33 4.02
252577
9814
752
30
56
94
121649
3711
265
5
9
NO 1
Btu/lb
vol.%
11180
2.69
14250
2.49
12570
2.07
Note: "1 refers to flags 8(4),l2(2,3).13<1t2,4),14(2,3) "2 refers to flags
15(1,2,3,4), 16(1,2,3,4). 17(4) **3 refers to flags 15(1,2.3.4).44(1.2,3.4)
~4 refers to flags 8(2),10(2),15(2),16(2).18(1) ~S refers to flags
8(2,4).11(1,3),10(2.4),13(2),14(4),15<2,4) ~6 refers to flags
10(1 A3).8(1.2,3).16(2).1
A2-49
-------
TABLE A2-14. SS15 - REFORMED GAS STORAGE TANK CONDENSATE
Substance
Units
CondiUon 3 - Wasta oil
Flag; Run 1| Flag. Run 2 1 Flag Run 3 1 Avorao*
Total stream flow rate
H<
Ch
Kg/hr 0.203 0.386) 0.733 1 0441
tfychiorlnated blphenyla (PCB) :
Monochtorobiphenyt (total)
Dlchkxobiptwiyl (total)
Trfchtorobiphenyl (total)
TetrachlOfobiphenyl (total)
Pentachtorobipnanyl (total)
Hexachlorobiphenyl (total)
Heptacnlorobiphenyl (total)
Octachlorobipnenyi (total)
Nonachlorobiphenyl (total)
Decachlorobiphanyt (total)
Total PCBs (Tri-Deca) including NDs
Total PCBs (Mono-Deca) including NO*
Total PCBs (Tri-Deca) excluding NO*
Total PCBs (Mono-Deca) excluding NDs
HS/L
JiS'L
fig^-
H9A-
ng/L
ng/t-
jtgfl-
ugA.
jtgA.
^gt-
ng/L
^g/L
ng/L
H9/U
6 NO 97.5
6 : 8QL 2.17
S I BQL 21.7
6 ' NO 2680
6 NO 2930
6 ; NO 2680
6 : NO 2290
6 NO 1150
6 NO 287
6 NO 159
6 . < 12200
6 < 12300
6 > 22
6 > 24
SQL 8.81
BQL 2.96
SQL 2.02
NO 4700
NO 5100
NO 4700
NO 4000
NO 2000
NO 500
NO 280
< 21300
< 21300
s- 2.02
s> 13.8
< 97.50
BQL 2.17
BQL 21.70
NO 2680
NO 2930
NO 2680
NO 2290
NO 1150
NO 286.5
NO 159.2
< 12200
< 12300
> 12
> 19
lorobenzene* and enlof ophenola
1,2-DichlOfObenzone
1 ,3-DIchlorobenzone
1 ,4-Olchlorobenzene
Total ofchlorobenzenes
1 ,2,3-Trichlorobenzone
1 ,3.5-TrichIofobenzene
1 ^,4-Trictilorobenzene
Total trichlorobenzenes
1 ,2,3.4-Tetrachlorobenzene
1.2.3.5- and/or 1.2.4.5-Tetrachlorobenzene
Total tatrachlorobenzene*
Pentachlorobenzene
Hexachlorobenzene
2,3-Dfchlofopnenol
2.4-Dichlofophenol
2.5-Dichlofophenol
2,6-Dichlorophenoi
3,4-Dichloropneno)
3.5-OIchlorophenol
Total dtehtorophenols
2,3,4-TrJchloropnenol
2,3.5-Trichlorophenol
2.3.6-Trfehtofophenol
2.4.S-Trichlorophenol
2.4.6-Trichlorophenol
Total trichtoroph«noJ«
2.3,4.5,- and/or 2,3,4.6-TetracWorophenol
2.3.5,6-Tetrachlorophenol
Total totrachlorophenols
3entachkxophenol
Total CB
Total CP
H9/1-
Jig/l-
^9'l.
H*T-
iigA.
ng^.
«/L
^S^-
HgA.
Mg/L
i^g/t
ngfl-
ng/t-
K9/1-
jigrt-
ng/L
ngfl-
>igA.
jig/L
tigt-
HO/L
H9A
jigA-
ngfl-
^g/».
ngo.
vgn.
n&-
ng/L
^O/L
jigrt.
ngfl-
4 NA
4 NA
4 NA
4 NA
4 i NA
4 : NA
4 • NA
4 NA
4 NA
4 NA
4 ' NA
4 NA
4 NA
•4 NA
4 I NA
4 , NA
4 ' NA
4 NA
4 NA
4 NA
4 NA
4 NA
4 NA
4 NA
4 NA
4 NA
4 ; NA
4 NA
4 NA
4 NA
4 NA
4 NA
o NO 960
NO 960
NO 960
NO 2880
NO 960
NO 960
NO 960
NO 2880
NO 960
NO 1900
NO 2860
NO 960
NO 960
NO 960
NO 960
NO 960
NO 960
NO 960
NO 960
NO 5760
NO 960
NO 960
NO 960
NO 960
NO 960
NO 4800
NO 1900
NO 960
NO 2860
NO 960
NO 10540
NO 14380
A2-50
-------
TABLE A2-14. SS15 - REFORMED GAS STORAGE TANK CONDENSATE
(continued)
Substance
Polyeycllc aromatic hydrocarbons (PAH)
Naphthalene
2-Methylnaphthalene
2-CI-Naphtrialene
Aeenaphthylene
Acenapthene
Fluorene
Phananthrene
Anthracene
Fluoranthene
Pyrene
Benzo (a) anthracene
Chrysens
Benzo (b) fluoranthene
Benzo (k) fluoranthane
Banzo (a) pyrana
Banzo (a) pyrana
Parylana
Indano (1^,3-cd) pyrana
Oibanz (a,h) anthracene
Banzo (g.h.i) parylana
Total PAH* including NO*
Total PAHs excludnq NO*
Units
Condition 3 - Waste oil
=lag Run 1 1 Flag Run 2| Flag Run3| Average
US'!-
ufl/L
ug/L
^gfl-
u.g/L
US/I.
HS/L
ust
H9/L
ngfl-
jigfl-
«C»-
H9"-
vgn.
u.g/L
JiSA-
ngfl.
u.S'L
V&l-
ng/L
u,gA.
ugA.
4 NA
4 NA
4 NA
4 NA
4 NA
4 NA
4 NA
4 NA
4 NA
4 NA
4 NA
4 NA
4 NA
4 NA
4 NA
4 NA
4 NA
4 NA
4 ' NA
4 NA
4 NA
4 NA
6100000
61000
NO 960
210000
BQL 3600
SQL 5100
17000
BQL 1700
BQL 5700
BQL 5800
NO 960
NO 960
NO 960
NO 960
NO 960
BQL 1100
NO 960
NO 960
NO 960
BQL 1300
< 6420000
> 641000
Mlseeilanaous
Total organic carbon
Total sulfur (as S)
Organic halogens (as chloride)
Inorganic halogens (a* chlorida)
Haxavalant chromium
ppmw
wt%
ppbw
ppmw
ppmw
4 NA
4 NA
4 NA
4 NA
4 NA
313
0.0003
3 1920
17
NA
Volatile oraante compounds
Vinyl chlorida
Methyl chlorida
Trans-1 ,2-dtehloroethena
Cis- 1 ,2-dichloroatherta
Chloroform
1.1.1 - Trichloroathane
Carbon tatrachlorida
Benzene
1 ,2 - Dichloroethane
Trichtoroethene
Toluena
1 ,1.2 - Trichtoroattww
Tetrachloroethana
1 2. • Dibromoethane
Chtorobenzene
E thy (benzene
M-/P-Xytena
O-Xylane
1 ,3 - Dichtorobenzene
1 ,4 - Dichlorobenzerta
1 ,2 • Dfchkxobenzene
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
6,24 NO 2.50
6,24 NO 2.50
6.24 NO 2.50
6,24 NO 2.50
6.24 NO 2.50
6,24 NO 2.50
0,24 NO 2.50
6,24 ALR 738
6,24 NO 2.50
6^4 NO 2.50
6^4 45.0
3,24 NO 2.50
8,24 SQL 7.51
8,24 NO 2.50
6^4 NO 2.50
6.24 NO 2.50
644 NO 2.50
8^4 NO 2.5C
6.24 NO 2.5C
6^4 NO 2.5C
644 NO 2.5C
NO 5
NO 5
NO 5
NO 5
NO 5
NO 5
NO 5
ALR 900
NO 5
NO 5
NO 5
NO 5
BQL 8
NO 5
BQL £
BQL e
NO £
NO !
NO £
NO !
NO 5
NO 2.50
NO 2.50
NO 2.50
NO 2.50
NO 2.50
NO 2.50
NO 2.50
ALR 738.1
NO 2.50
NO 2.50
BQL 45.00
NO 2.50
BQL 7.51
NO 2.50
BQL 2.50
BQL 2.50
NO 2.50
NO 2.50
NO 2.50
NO 2.50
NO 2.50
A2-51
-------
TABLE A2-14. SS15 - REFORMED GAS STORAGE TANK CONDENSATE
(continued)
Subatanc*
Unto
Condition 3 - Waste oil
Flag Run 1| Flag Run 2 1 Flag Run 3 1 Averaqo
Dfoxina and furan*
2378 TCDD
12378 PoCOD
123478 HxCDD
123678 HxCOO
123789 HxCDD
1234678 HpCDD
OCDO
2378 TCOF
12378 P«CDF
23478 PeCDF
123478 HxCDF
123678 HXCDF
234678 HXCDF
123789 HXCDF
1234678 HpCDF
1234789 HpCDF
OCDF
TCDD (total)
PaCDD (total)
HxCDD (total)
HpCDD (total)
TCOF (total)
PoCOF (total)
HxCDF (total)
HpCDF (totall
Total dtoxins (by iaomar) inducing NDt
Total furans (by Isomor) including NDs
Total doxina/furans (by isomor) inc ND*
Total dioxin* (by Isomw) excluding NDs
Total furans (by Isomer) axdudng NDs
Total dioxlna/furans (by isomsr) oxdudlng NOs
ng/L
ng/L
ng/L
ng/L
ng/L
ng/L
ng/L
ng/L
ng/L
ng/L
ng/L
ng/L
ng/L
ng/L
ng/L
ng/L
ng/L
ng/L
ng/L
ng/L
ng/L
ng/L
ng/L
ng/L
ng/L
ng/L
ng/L
ng/L
ng/L
ng/L
ng/L
4 NA
4 NA
4 NA
4 ; NA
4 .' NA
4 : NA
4 NA
4 NA
4 NA
4 NA
4 NA
4 NA
4 I NA
4 : NA
4 : NA
4 NA
4 NA
4 NA
4 NA
4 NA
4 NA
4 NA
4 NA
4 NA
4 NA
4 NA
4 NA
4 NA
4 ! NA
4 NA
4 NA
NO 0.22
NO 0.6
NO 0.13
NO 0.16
NO 0.2
NO 0.29
0.72
NO 0.17
NO 0.095
NO 0.27
INT
INT
INT
INT
ND 0.13
NO 0.22
ND 0.19
NO 4.34
ND 8.4
ND 1.63
NO 0.58
NO 6.46
ND 5.11
INT
STE 0.7
t. 2.32
ND 1.08
< 3.40
> 0.72
affi NO
> 0.72
Trac* m«tals
Antimony
Araente
Barium
BwylHum
Cadmium
Chromium (total)
Coppar
LMd
Mangana**
Mercury
Ntckrf
Phosphorus
Sotanium
Silver
Thallium
Tin
Zinc
H9rt-
vgH-
ugfl.
ng/L
ug/L
jigA.
ug/L
ugrt.
ugA.
ug/L
ugrt.
ug/L
M9"-
ugd.
ugA.
ugrt.
P&-
4 NA
4 NA
4 NA
4 NA
4 NA
4 NA
4 NA
4 NA
4 NA
4 NA
4 NA
4 ! NA
4 : NA
4 NA
4 NA
4 NA
4 NA
NO 100
NO 100
43
NO 10
12
16
5300
4600
170
7.4
23
520
NO 100
NO 10
ND 100
NO 100
8200
A2-52
-------
TABLE A2-15. SS16 - BOILER FLUE GAS SUMMARY
Substance
(Concentrations corrected to 7% O2)
Units
CONDITION 1 - WASTE WATER
-lag Rum Flag Run 2 Flag Run 3
ToUl stream flow rate
:
.dscm/hr
kg/hr
192
251
178
236
177
233
Polyehlorinatod biphenyla (PCB») ,
Monochlorobiphenyi (total)
Dichlorobiphenyl (total)
Trichlorobiphenyl (total)
Tetrachlorobiphenyl (total)
Pentachtorobiphenyl (total)
Haxachlorobiphenyl (total)
Heptachlorobiphenyf (total)
Octachtorobipnenyl (total)
Nonachlorobiphenyl (total)
Deeachlorobiphenyl (total)
Total PCBs (Tri-Deca) including NDs
Total PCBs (Mono-Deca) including NDs
Total PCBs (Tri-Deca) excluding NDs
Total PCBs (Mono-Deca) excluding NDs
ug/dscm
ug/dscm
ug/dscm
ug/dscm
ug/dsem
ug/dscm
ug/dscm
ug/dscm
ug/dscm
ug/dscm
ug/dscm
ug/dscm
ug/dscm
ng/dscm
ND 0.004
EMPC/B 0.14
EMPC/B 0.08
ND 0.01
ND 0.02
ND 0.02
0.03
ND 0.02
ND 0.02
ND 0.09
< 0.28
< 0.42
> 0.11
> 0.25
ND 0.001
0.003
EMPC 0.02
ND 0.002
EMPC 0.004
ND 0.003
EMPC 0.007
ND 0.003
ND 0.003
ND 0.01
< 0.05
< 0.06
> 0.03
> 0.04
ND 0.001
EMPC/B 0.08
EMPC/B 0.06
ND 0.002
ND 0.003
ND 0.002
ND 0.002
ND 0.002
ND 0.002
ND 0.01
< 0.08
< 0.16
> 0.06
> 0.14
Chlorob«nzene* and cnlorophenols
1,2 Dichlorobenzene
1 ,3 - Dichlorobenzene
1 ,4 - Dichlorobenzene
1 ,2,3 - Trichlorobenzene
1 ,2,4 - Trichlorobenzene
1 ,3.5 - Trichlorobenzene
1 ,2,3,4-Tetrachlorobenzene
1 ,2.3,5-Tetrachlorobenzene
1 ,2,4,5 - Tetrachtorobenzene
Pentachlorobenzane
Hexachlorobenzene
2 •> Chlorophenol
3,4 - Chlorophenol
2,3 - Dichlorophenoi
2,4 - Dichlorophenoi
2,5 - Diehlorophenot ;
2,6 - Dichlorophenoi
3,4 - Dichlorophenoi
3,5 - Dichlorophenoi
2,3,4 - Triehlorophenol
2,3,5 - Trichlorophenol
2,3,6 - Trichlorophenol
2,4,5 - Trichlorophenol
2,4,6 - Trichlorophenol
2,3,4,5 - Tetraehlorophenol
2,3.5,6 - Tetraehlorophenol
Pentachloropheno)
Total CB
Total CP
ug/dscm
)ig/dscm
ng/dscm
ug/dscm
H9/dscm
ug/dscm
ng/dscm
ng/dscm
H9/dscm
H9/dsem
Ug/dscm
ug/dscm
ug/dscm
ug/dscm
ug/dscm
|ig/dscm
Ug/dscm
ug/dscm
ng/dsem
ug/dscm
ng/dacm
)xg/dscm
ug/dscm
ug/dscm
ug/dscm
ug/dscm
jtg/dscm
ug/dscm
ug/dscm
ND 0.71
ND 0.74
ND 0.69
ND 0.71
ND 0.68
ND 0.68
ND 0.55
NA
ND 0.54
ND 0.52
ND 0.54
ND 0.91
ND 0.71
ND 0.96
ND 0.90
ND 0.83
ND 0.83
ND 0.73
ND 0.70
ND 0.92
ND 1.03
ND 0.91
ND 0.90
ND 0.94
ND 0.97
ND 1.03
ND 1.14
ND 6.37
ND 14.4
ND 3.53
ND 3.21
ND 3.13
ND 3.02
ND 3.16
ND 3.12
ND 2.07
NA
ND 2.44
ND 1.99
ND 2.32
ND 3.94
ND 2.96
ND 3.96
ND 3:85
ND 4.07
ND 3.39
ND 2.85
ND 2.45
ND 3.33
ND 3.59
ND 3.38
ND 3.26
ND 3.50
ND 3.50
ND 3.78
ND 4.48
ND 27.98
ND 56.3
ND 0.38
ND 0.37
ND 0.37
. ND 0.35
ND 0.40
ND 0.39
ND 0.48
MA
ND 0.15
ND 0.30
ND 0.35
ND 0.48
ND 0.21
ND 0.51
"ND 0.48
ND 0.53
ND 0.45
ND 0.43
ND 0.53
ND 0.53
ND 0.52
ND 0.43
ND 0.53
ND 0.53
, ND 0.53
ND 0.54
ND 0.79
ND 3.54
ND 8.0
A2-53
-------
TABLE A2-15. SS16 - BOILER FLUE GAS SUMMARY
(continued)
Substanca
(Concentrations corrected to 7% O2)
} CONDITION 1 • WASTE WATER
Units [Flag , Run 1 Flag Run 2 Flag Run 3
Pdyeydle aromatic hydrocarbon* (PAH)
D*
Naphthalana
2-Mathylnaphthalan«
2-CJ-Naphthatena
Acanaphthytona
Acenapthena
FtUOrana
Phananthrana
Anthracana
Fluoranthana
Pyrana
Bonzo (a) anthracana
Chrytana
Benzo (b) fluoranthena
Banzo (k) fluoranttwn*
Banzo (a) pyrana
B«nzo (a) pyrana
Parylana .
Indeno (1 2,3-cd) pyrana
Dlbonz (a,h) anthraeana
Banzo (g.h.i) parytana
Total PAHs including. N0<
Total PAH* axdudng NDt
oxlna and furana
2378 TCOO
12378 PaCDD
123478 HxCDD
123678 HxCDD
123789 HxCOO
1234678 HpGDO
OCDO
2378 TCDF
12378 PaCDF
23478 PaCDF
123478 HxCDF
123678 HXCDF
234678 HxCDF
123789 HxCDF
1234678 HpCDF
1234789 HpCDF
OCDF
TCDD (total)
PaCDD (total)
HxCDD (total)
HpCDD (total)
TCDF (total)
PaCDF (total)
HxCDF (total)
HpCDF (total)
Total dloxins (by isomer) ine). NDs
Total furans (by Isomer) ind. NO*
Total dloxins and furans (by isomar) Ind. NDs
Total dloxins (by isomer) axd. NDs
Total furans (by Isomar) axd. NDs
Total dloxins and furans (by isomor) axd. NDs
(ig/dscm
(ig/dscm
jig/c&em
u.g/dscm
u.g/dtcm
u,g/dscm
(tg/dscm
ng/d*cm
ng/dscm
ng/dscm
u,g/dscm
u,g/dscm
u,gttscm
(ig/dscm
jig/dscm
lig/dscm
jig/dscm
lig/dscm
(ig/dsem
jig/dscm
tig/dscm
ng/dsem
ng/dscm
ng/dscm
ng/dscm
ng/dscm
ng/dscm
ng/dscm
ng/dscm
ng/dscm
ng/dscm
ng/dscm
ng/dscm
ng/dsem
ng/dsem
ng/dsem
ng/dscm
ng/dscm
ng/dscm
ng/dscm
ng/dscm
ng/dscm
ng/dscm
ng/dscm
ng/dscm
ng/dscm
ng/dscm
ng/dscm
ng/dscm
ng/dscm
ng/dscm
ng/dscm
ng/dsem
41 12.7
41 ND 0.34
41 ND 0.30
41 ND 0.19
41 ND 0.31
41 ND 027
41 E 0.34
41 ND 0.13
41 ND 0.10
41 E 0.14
41 ND 0.08
41 ND 0.09
41 ND 0.08
41 ND 0.08
41 ND 0.08
41 ND 0.09
41 ND 0.09
41 ND 0.06
41 ND 0.07
41 ND 0.07
41 < 15.6
41 > 13.1
41 E 30.4
41 ND 1.83
41 ND 1.16
41 ND 0.95
41 ND 1.47
41 ND 1.24
41 ND 0.79
41 ND 0.82
41 ND 0.82
41 ND 0.61
41 ND 0.74
41 ND 0.79
41 ND 0.69
41 ND 0.74
41 ND 0.76
41 ND 0.73
41 ND 0.75
41 ND 0.88
41 . ND 0.90
41 ND 0.84
41 < 47.9
41 > 30.4
ND 0.003
ND 0.01
0.01
0.02
EMPC 0.02
B 0.20
26 B 0.55
B 0.02
0.02
EMPC 0.02
0.07
0.03
0.04
EMPC 0.01
0.10
0.05
0.64
0.02
. 0.03
0.19
: 0.35
0.05
0.11
023
025
< 0.816
< 0.995
< 1.811
> 0.800
> 0.995
> 1.795
ND 0.007
ND 0.01
ND 0.01
ND 0.01
ND 0.01
0.01
26 0.17
0.01
ND 0.01
NO- 0.01
ND 0.01
ND 0.004
EMPC 0.003
ND 0.01
0.01
0.01
0.03
0.01
ND 0.01
ND 0.01
0.01
0.01
EMPC 0.01
EMPC 0.003
0.03
< 0230
< 0.100
< 0.330
> 0.180
> 0.063
> 0243
41 17.9
41 ND 025
41 ND 021
41 ND 0.16
41 ND 021
41 ND 020
41 ND 0.13
41 ND 0.15
41 E 0.75
41 E 0.51
41 ND 020
41 ND 021
41 ND 0.18
41 ND 0.17
41 ND 0.19
41 ND 0.19
41 ND 020
41 ND 020
41 ND 022
41 ND 0.19
41 < 22.4
41 > 18.3
ND 0.001
ND 0.001
ND 0.001
ND 0.001
ND 0.001
EMPC/B 0.01
26 B 0.12
ND 0.000
ND 0.001
ND 0.001
ND 0.001
ND 0.001
EMPC 0.002
ND 0.001
ND 0.001
ND 0.001
ND 0.001
ND 0.001
ND 0.001
ND 0.001
0.006
ND 0.000
ND 0.001
EMPC 0.002
ND 0.001
< 0.136
< 0.010
< 0.146
> 0.130
> 0.002
> 0.132
A2-54
-------
TABLE A2-15. SS16 - BOILER FLUE GAS SUMMARY
(continued)
Substance
(Concentrations corrected to 7% O2J
1 CONDITION 1 - WASTE WATER
Units Flag Run 1 | Flag Run 2 Flag Run 3
Volatile organic compounds
Vinyl chloride
Methyl chloride
Trans-1.2-clchloroethene
Ci*-1,2-
-------
TABLE A2-15. SS16 - BOILER FLUE GAS SUMMARY
(continued)
Substance
(Concentrations corrected to 7% O2)
Units
CONDITION 2 - SOIL
Flag Run 1 IFlag Run 2
Total stream flow rate
dscm/hr
kg/hr
208
277
297
389
Polyehlorlnated blphenyls (PCBs)
Monochlorobiphenyl (total)
Dichtofobiphenyl (total)
Trichtorobiphenyl (total)
Tetrachlorobiphenyl (total)
Pontachlorobiphanyl (total)
Hexachlorobiphenyl (total)
Heptachlorobiphenyl (total)
Octachtorobiphenyl (total)
Nonachloroblphenyl (total)
Dacachlorobiphenyl (total)
Total PCBs (Tri-Deca) Including NDs
Total PCBs (Mono-Decs) including NDs
Total PCBs (Tri-Deca) excluding NDs
Total PCBs (Mono-Deca) excluding NDs
ug/dscm
ug/dscm
ug/dscm
ug/dscm
ug/dscm
ug/dscm
ug/dscm
ug/dscm
Ug/dscm
ug/dsem
ug/dscm
ug/dscm
ug/dscm
ug/dscm
ND 0.002
NO 0.002
ND 0.003
ND 0.01
EMPC 0.02
ND 0.01
ND 0.01
ND 0.01
ND 0.01
ND 0.02
< 0.08
< 0.08
> 0.02
> 0.02
ND 0.008
0.13
0.53
0.48
0.03
ND 0.03
ND 0.03
ND 0.03
ND 0.01
ND 0.10
< 1.24
< 1.37
> 1.04
> 1.17
ChlorobonzMio* and ehlorophenolc
1,2 Dtchtorobenzene
1 ,3 • Dichlorobenzene
1 ,4 - Dichlorobenzene
1 ,2,3 - Trichlorobenzene
1 ,2,4 - Trichlorobenzene
1 ,3,5 - Trichlorobenzene
1 ,2,3,4-Tetrachlorobenzene
1 ,2,3.5-Tetrachlorobenzeno
1 ,2,4,5 - Tetrachlofobanzene
Pentachtorobenzene
Hexachlorobenzene
2 - Chlor ophenol
3,4 - Chlorophenol
2,3 - Dichlorophenol
2.4 • Dichlorophenol
2,5 • Dichlorophenol
2,6 - Dichlorophenol
3,4 - Dichlorophenol
3,5 - Dichlorophenol
2,3,4 - Trichloropheno!
2,3,5 - Trichloropheno!
2,3,6 - Trichlorophenol
2,4,5 - Trichlorophenol
2,4,6 - Trichlorophenol
2,3,4,5 - Tetrachlorophenol
2,3,5,6 - Tetrachlorophenol
Pentachtorophenol
Total CB
Total CP
ug/dscm
ug/dsem
ug/dscm
ug/dsem
(tg/dscm
u,g/dscm
ug/dscm
ug/dscm
ug/dscm
ug/dscm
jig/dscm
ug/dscm
ug/dscm
ug/dscm
ug/dscm
ug/dsem
ug/dscm
tig/dsem
tig/dsem
ug/dsem
ug/dscm
ug/dscm
ug/dscm
ug/dscm
ug/dscm
ug/dscm
ug/dscm
ug/dscm
ug/dscm
ND 0.91
ND 0.89
ND 0.89
ND 1.00
ND 0.93
ND 0.92
ND 0.81
ND 0.62
ND 0.71
ND 0.63
E 0.63
ND 0.97
ND 0.49
ND 1.42
ND 1.11
ND 1.19
ND 1.09
ND 1.34
ND 1.22
ND 1.40
ND 1.37
ND 1.33
ND 1.42
ND 1.38
ND 1.13
ND 1.12
ND 1.34
ND 8.05
ND 19.3
ND 1.07
ND 1.06
ND 1.09
ND 1.20
ND 1.11
ND 1.08
ND 0.88
ND 0.86
ND 0.73
ND 0.76
ND 0.64
ND 1.08
ND 0.52
ND 1.57
ND 1.34
ND 1.21
ND 1.27
ND 1.01
ND 1.03
ND 1.41
ND 1.32
ND 1.44
ND 1.34
ND 1.39
ND 1.06
ND 1.18
ND 1.41
ND 9.41
ND 19.6
A2-56
-------
TABLE A2-15. SS16 - BOILER FLUE GAS SUMMARY
(continued)
Substance
(Concentrations corrected to 7% O2)
Unfa
PoJycydlc aromatic hydrocarbons (PAH)
Naphthalene
2-Methylnaphthalene
2-CI-Naphthalene
Acenaphthylene
Acenapthene
Fluorene
Phenanthrene
Anthracene
Fluoranthene
Pyrena
Benzo (a) anthracana
Chrysene
Banzo (b) fluorantfiana
Banzo (k) fluoranthana
Banzo (a) pyrene
Banzo (a) pyrene
Parylana
Indano (1.2,3-cd) pyrana
Oibanz (a.h) anthracana
Bsnzo (g,h,i) perylene .
Total PAHs including NOs
Total PAHs axcludng NOs
Dtoxfn* and furans
2378 TCOO
12378PeCDO
123478 HxCDO
123878 HxCOD
123789 HxCDD
1234678 HpCOO
OCOO
2378 TCDF
12378PeCDF
23478 PeCOF
123478 HxCOF
123878 HXCOF
234878 HxCDF
123789 HxCDF
1234678 HpCDF
1234789 HpCDF
OCDF
TCDD (total)
PoCDO (total)
HxCOD (total)
HIpCOD (total)
TCOF (total)
PeCDF (total)
HxCDF (total)
HpCDF (total)
Total dtoxins (by Isomar) ind. NDs
Total furans (by isomar) ind. ND«
Total dtodns and furans (by isomar) ind. NO<
Total dtodns (by isomar) axd. NDs
Total furans (by isomar) axd. NOs
Total doxins and furans (by isomar) axd. NOs
Hg/d$cm
ug/dscm
ug/dscm
ug/dscm
ug/dscm
jig/da on
ug/dscm
ug/dscm
ug/dscm
ug/dscm
ug/dscm
ug/dscm
ug/dscm
ug/dsem
ug/dacm
u,g/dscm
ug/dscm
ug/dscm
u,g/dscm
ug/dscm
ug/dscm
ug/dscm
CONDITION 2 - SOIL
Flag .Run1|Flag Run 2
41 E 2.5
41 NO 0.21
41 ND 0.25
41 NO 0.16
41 ND 0.25
41 ND 0.21
41 ND 0.12
41 ND 0.11
41 NO 0.08
41 ND 0.05
41 ND 0.05
41 ND 0.05
41 ND 0.04
41 NO 0.04
41 ND 0.04
41 ND 0.04
41 ND 0.06
41 NO 0.04
41 NO 0.05
41 NO 0.04
41 ND 4.4
41 > 2.5
41 E 1.5
41 NO 0.10
41 NO 0.12
41 ND 0.07
41 ND 0.12
41 NO 0.10
41 NO 0.05
41 NO 0.05
41 NO 0.04
41 ND 0.02
41 NO 0.02
41 NO 0.02
41 ND 0.02
41 NO 0.02
41 NO 0.02
41 ND 0.02
41 ND 0.03
41 ND 0.02
41 ND 0.02
41 ND 0.02
41 NO 2.3
41 > 1.5
ng/dscm
ng/dscm
ng/dscm
ng/dscm
ng/dscm
ng/dscm
ng/dscm
ng/dscm
ng/dscm
ng/dscm
ng/dscm
ng/dscm
ng/dscm
ng/dscm
ng/dscm
ng/dscm
ng/dscm
ng/dscm
ng/dscm
ng/dscm
ng/dscm
ng/dscm
ng/dscm
ng/dscm
ng/dscm
ng/dscm
ng/dscm
ng/dscm
ng/dscm
ng/dscm
ng/dscm
ND 0.002
0.003
ND 0.003
ND 0.002
ND 0.003
NO 0.02
26 B 0.20
0.003
ND 0.002
NO 0.002
NO 0.002
0.003
0.009
ND 0.003
0.033
0.009
0.063
ND 0.002
ND 0.003
0.003
0.042
0.003
0.01
0.03
0.06
< 0.233
< 0.131
< 0.364
> OJ203
> 0.120
> 0.323
NO 0.003
ND 0.004
ND 0.005
NO 0.004
NO 0.004
EMPC 0.01
26 B 0.08
0.001
NO 0.003
NO 0.003
EMPC 0.003
NO 0.003
NO 0.003
ND 0.004
EMPC 0.004
NO 0.005
NO 0.010
EMPC 0.003
NO 0.004
EMPC 0.007
EMPC 0.019
0.001
EMPC 0.001
EMPC 0.005
EMPC 0.005
< 0.107
< 0.038
< 0.145
> 0.900
> 0.008
> 0.908
A2-57
-------
TABLE A2-15. SS16 - BOILER FLUE GAS SUMMARY
(continued)
Substance
(Concentrations corrected to 7% O2)
Units
CONDITION 2 - SOIL
Flag Run 1 (Flag Hun 2
Volatile organic compounds
Vinyl chloride
Mathyl chloride
Trans- 1 ,2-dtehloroethen«
Cis-1 .2-dchloroeth«ne
Chloroform
1.1.1 • Trichtoroethane
Carbon tetrachloride
Benzene
1.2-Dfchloroethane
Trichloroethene
Toluene
1.1,2- Trichtoroethane
Tetrachloroetnene
1 ,2 - Oibromoetnane
Chlorobonzene
Ethylbenzene
M-/P-Xylene
O-Xytone
1,3 - Dtehlorobenzene
1 ,4 • Dichlorobenzene
1 .2 - Dichlorobenzene
Trac* metala
Mi
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Beryllium
Cadmium
Chromium (total)
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Phosphorus
Selenium
Silver
Thallium
Tin
Zinc
HOT gas specie* (dry, 7% O2)
Oxygen (O2)
Carbon dioxide (CO2)
Moisture
ug/dscm
ug/dscm
ug/dscm
ug/dscm
ug/dscm
ng/dscm
lig/dscm
')ig/dscm
Hg/dscm
|ig/dscm
ng/dscm
;ixg/dscm
H9/dscm
lig/dscm
H9/dscm
(ic/dscm
ng/dscm
{(icydscm
u,gfc&c$n
jig/dsem
ixg/dscm
ng/dscm
(ic/dscm
jig/dscm
Hg/dacm
ug/dscm
(ig/dacm
^g/dsem
:)ig/dscm
HS^dscm
Hg/dscm
H9/d«cm
ji^dscm
ug/dscm
jig/dscm
(^g/clsem
:^g/dsem
ug/dscm
vol. %
vol. %
vol. %
"1 NO 0.98
"1 < 3
"1 NO 0.98
~1 NO 0.98
"1 NO 0.98
~1 f 2.66
"1 NO 0.98
"1 SQL 2
**1 NO 0.98
**1 NO 0.98
~1 < 1.8
"1 NO 0.98
"1 < 1.00
"1 NO 0.98
"1 NO 0.98
"1 NO 0.98
~1 NO 1.96
**1 NO 0.98
°M NO 0.98
"1 NO 0.98
••1 < 1.10
"1 NO 1.05
-1 < • 2
•M NO 1.05
"1 NO 1.05
"1 NO 1.05
~1 < 1.05
"1 NO 1.05
"1 < 6
"1 NO 1.05
"1 NO 1.05
~1 < 4.7
"1 NO 1.05
"1 NO 1.05
••1 NO 1.05
«*1 NO 1.05
-1 NO 1.05
"1 NO 2.11
-1 NO 1.05
-1 MO 1.05
~1. < 1.14
~1 < 1.28
40 3.7
40 NO 2.88
40 1.61
40 NO 0.29
40 NO 0.29
40 0.72
40 1.90
40 4.6
40 3.5
40 NO 0.06
40 0.55
40 NO 2.9
40 NO 2.88
40 NO 2.88
40 NO 2.88
40 NO 2.88
40 9.2
7.38
8.71
11.8
40 1.9
40 NO 1.35
40 0.57
40 NO 0.13
40 0.35
40 0.69
40 0.51
40 2.7
40 0.3
40 NO 6.00
40 0.32
40 NO 1.3
40 NO 1.35
40 NO 1.35
40 NO 1.35
40 " ' 1.75
40 2.7
8.57
9.11
9.7
Minor gas species* (dry, 7% O2)
Total hydrocarbons ( methane equivalent)
Hydrogen chloride (HO)
Carbon monoxide (CO)
Nitrogen oxides (NOx)
Sulfur doxide (SO2)
Partfculat* and visible emissions
Partculat»(7%O2)
Opacity
ppmv
'mg/daem
ppmv
ppmv
ppmv
,mcydscm
%
0.9
3 NO 0.83
8.2
62.9
1.7
19 0.43
NA
0.4
NO 0.53
13
69.7
22
NO 0.13
NA
A2-58
-------
TABLE A2-15. SS16 - BOILER FLUE GAS SUMMARY
(continued)
Substance
(Concentrations corrected to 7% O2)
Units
Total stream flow rate
dscm/hr
kg/hr
CONDITION 3 - WASTE OIL
Flag Run 1 |Flag Run 2 |Fiag Run 3
344
450
214
282
232
307
Polychlorlnated blph«nyl« (PCB«)
Monochtorobiphenyl (total)
Dichtorobiphenyl (total)
Trfchtorobiphenyl (total)
Tetrachlorobiphenyl (total)
Pentachlorobiphenyt (total)
Hexachlorobiphenyl (total)
Heptachlorobiphenyl (total)
Gctaehlorobiphenyl (total)
Nonachlorobiphenyl (total)
Decachlofobiphenyl (total)
Total PCBs (Tri-Deca) including NDs
Total PCBs (Monc-Deca) including NDs
Total PCBs (Tri-Deca) excluding NDs
Total PCBs (Mono-Deca) excluding NDs
H9/dscm
u.g/dscm
ng/dsem
ng/dscm
pg/dscm
Hg/dscm
Hg/dscm
u.g/dscm
u.g/dscm
ng/dscm
u.g/dscm
u.g/dscm
u.g/dscm
ng/dscm
NO 0.003
EMPC 0^0
ND 0.01
EMPC 0.60
EMPC 0.07
ND 0.01
ND 0.01
ND 0.01
ND 0.01
ND 0.02
< 0.72
< 0.92
> 0.67
> 0.87
ND 0.005
ND 0.005
ND 0.01
EMPC 2.54
ND 0.01
ND 0.01
ND 0.01
ND 0.01
ND 0.01
ND 0.02
< 2.62
< 2.63
> 2.54
> 2.54
ND 0.001
EMPC/B 0.05
EMPC/B 0.03
ND 0.005
ND 0.005
ND 0.005
ND 0.005
ND 0.005
ND 0.01
ND 0.02
< 0.09
< 0.14
> 0.03
> 0.08
Chlorobenzwie* and ehlorophenol*
1 ,2 Dicntorobenzene
1,3-Dfenlorobenzene
1 ,4 - Dichlorobenzene
1 ,2,3 • Trichlorpbenzene
1 ,2,4 - Trichlorobenzene
1 ,3,5 -Trichlorobenzene
1 ,2,3,4-Tetrachlorobenzene
1 ,2,3,5-Tetrachlorobenzene
1 ,2,4,5 - Tetrachlorobenzene
Pentaehlorobenzene
Hexachlorobenzene
2 • Chlorophenol
3,4 - Chlorophenol
2,3 - Dbhlorophenol
2,4 - Dichlorophenol
2,5 • Dichlorophenol
2,6 - Dichlorophenol
3,4 - Dichlorophenol
3,5 - Dichlorophenol
2,3,4 - Triehlorophenol ,
2,3,5 - Trichtorophenol
2,3,6 - Triehlorophenol
2,4,5 - Triehlorophenol
2,4,6 - Trichlorophenol
2,3.4,5 • Tetrachlorophenol
2,3,5,6 - Tetrachlorophenol
Pentachlorophend
Total CB
Total CP
ng/dscm
ng/dscm
Hg/dscm
H9/dscm
|xg/dscm
|ig/dscm
Hg/dscm
Hg/dscm
ng/dscm
(ig/dscm
(ag/dscm
Hg/dscm
Hg/dscm
Hg/dscm
ng/dscm
jig/dscm
Hg/dscm
^g/dscm
ng/dscm
u.g/dscm
ng/dscm
^ig/dscm
Hg/dscm
Hg/dscm
l^g/dscm
H9/dscm
lig/dscm
H9/dscm
^g/dscm
ND 0.69
ND 0.66
ND 0.67
ND 0.81
ND 0.75
ND 0.73
ND 0.73
NA
ND 0.38
ND 0.86
ND 1.12
ND 0.70
ND 0.16
ND 0.79
ND 0.64
ND 0.70
ND 0.24
ND 0.61
ND 0.23
ND 0.87
ND 1.12
ND 0.89
ND 0.96
ND 1.05
ND 0.77
ND 1.19
ND 2.00
ND 7.40
ND 12.9
ND 0.52
ND 0.50
ND 0.51
ND 0.46
ND 0.42
ND 0.42
ND 0.47
NA
ND 0.20
ND 0.48
ND 0.62
ND 0.55
ND 0.10
ND 0.50
ND 0.42
ND 0.53
ND 0.19
ND 0.52
ND 0.22
ND 0.68
ND 0.75
ND 0.66
ND 0.60
ND 0.67
ND 0.53
ND 0.85
ND 1.42
ND 4.60
ND 9.2
ND 0.16
ND 0.15
ND 0.15
ND 0.15
ND 0.14
ND 0.14
ND 0.13
NA
ND 0.13
ND 0.14
ND 0.17
ND 0.17
•ND 0.03
ND 0.16
ND 0.14
ND 0.17
ND 0.06
ND 0.15
ND 0.06
ND 0.19
ND 0.21
ND 0.19
ND 0.17
ND 0.19
ND 0.15
ND 0.24
ND 0.38
ND 1.45
ND 2.7
A2-59
-------
TABLE A2-15. SS16 - BOILER FLUE GAS SUMMARY
(continued)
Substance
(Concentrations corrected to 7% O2)
Units
Polyeydle «om«Uc hydrocarbons (PAH)
t*<
Naphthalene
2-Methylnaphthalene
2-O-Naphthalene
Acenaphthylene
Acenapthene
Ftuorene
Phenanthrene
Anthracene
Fluoranthene
Pyrene
Benzo (a) anthracene
Chtysene
Benzo (b) ftuoranthene
Benzo (k) fluoranthene
Benzo (e) pyrene
Benzo (a) pyrene
Perylene
Indeno (1 ,2,3-cd) pyrene
Dibenz (a.h) anthracene
Benzo (g.h.l) perylene
Total PAHs including NDs
Total PAHs excluding NDs
axlrts and furans
2378 TCDO
12378 PeCOD
123478 HxCOO
123678 HxCDD
123789 HxCDO
1234878 HpCOD
OCDD
2378 TCOF
12378 PeCDF
23478 PeCDF
123478 HxCDF
123678 HXCDF
234678 HxCDF
123789 HxCDF
1234678 HpCDF
1234789 HpCDF
OCDF
TCDD (total)
PeCDD (total)
HxCDD (total)
HpCDD (total)
TCOF (total)
PeCDF (total)
HxCDF (total)
HpCDF (total)
Total doxins (by isomer) ind. NDs
Total (urans (by Isomer) bid. NDs
Total doxins and furans (by Isomer) Ind. NDs
Total doxins (by Isomer) exd. NDs
Total furans (by Isomer) exd. NDs
Total doxins and furans (by isomer) exd. NDs
jig/dsom
ngttsetn
lig/dscm
ligAdscm
fig/dscm
|io/dsem
(ig/dscm
lig/dscm
lio/dscm
ug/dscm
ug/dscm
}ig/dscm
ug/dscm
u,g/dscm
jig/dscm
ug/dscm
u.g/dsem
u.g/dsem
u,g/dscm
u.g/dsem
(ig/dacrrt
jig/dscm
CONDITION 3 • WASTE OIL
Flag Run 1 (Flag Run 2 |Flag Run 3
41 Nb' 1.1
41 ND 1.41
41 ND 1.53
,41 ND 1.02
;41 NO 1.54
41 ND 1.36
,41 ND 0.94
41 ND 0.91
41 ND 0.88
41 ND 0.88
41 ND 123
41 ND 1.40
41 ND 1.50
41 ND 1.48
41 ND 1.46
41 ND 1.49
41 ND 1.58
41 ND 1.24
41 ND 1.40
41 ND 1.36
41 ND 25.7
41 alt ND
i
ng/dscm
ng/dscm
ng/dscm
nc/dscm
ng/dsem
ng/dscm
ng/d*em
ng/dscm
ng/dscm
ng/dscm
ng/dscm
ng/dsem
ng/dscm
ng/dscm
ng/dscm
ng/dscm
ng/dscm
ng/dscm
ng/dscm
ng/dscm
ng/dscm
ng/dscm
ng/dscm
ng/dscm
ng/dscm
ng/dscm
ng/dscm
ng/dscm
ng/dsem
ng/dscm
ng/dscm
ND 0.001
ND 0.001
ND 0.001
I EMPC 0.001
0.001
B 0.01
26 B 0.09
0.003
0.003
EMPC 0.002
0.005
0.002
B 0.003
ND 0.001
0.008
EMPC 0.002
! 0.008
0.001
0.002
0.003
0.017
0.012
0.015
0.015
0.013
< 0.101
< 0.038
< 0.138
i > 0.102
> 0.036
> 0.138
41 NO 1.5
41 ND 1.91
41 ND 2.12
41 ND 1.41
41 ND 2.13
41 ND 1.87
41 ND 1.23
41 ND 1.18
41 ND 1.14
41 ND 1.20
41 ND 1.67
41 ND 1.90
41 ND 2.07
41 ND 2.04
41 ND 2.01
41 ND 2.05
41 ND 2.17
41 ND 1.70
41 ND 1.92
41 ND 1.86
41 ND 3S.1
41 aH ND
ND 0.002
ND 0.002
ND 0.002
ND 0.001
ND 0.002
B 0.010
26 B 0.12
0.002
ND 0.002
ND 0.002
EMPC 0.002
0.002
B 0.005
ND 0.002
0.017
0.097
0.221
ND 0.002
ND 0.002
EMPC 0.002
0.022
0.002
0.005
0.007
0.040
< 0.139
< 0.263
< 0.403
> 0.130
> 0.256
> 0.336
41 E 4.4
41 ND 0.29
41 ND 0.24
41 ND 0.16
41 ND OJ7
41 ND 0.21
41 ND 0.12
41 ND 0.12
41 ND 0.13
41 ND 0.21
41 ND 0.27
41 ND 0.29
41 ND 0.45
41 ND 0.47
41 ND 0.46
41 ND 0.49
41 ND 0.73
41 ND 0.86
41 ND 0.67
41 ND O.S2
41 < 11.3
41 > 4.4
NO 0.002
ND 0.002
ND 0.002
ND 0.002
ND 0.002
EMPC 0.002
26 B 0.07
EMPC 0.001
ND 0.002
ND 0.002
EMPC 0.001
ND 0.001
0.001
ND 0.002
EMPC 0.001
ND 0.005
ND 0.007
ND 0.002
EMPC 0.002
EMPC 0.024
Q 0.005
EMPC 0.001
EMPC 0.002
Q 0.002
EMPC 0.002
< 0.030
< 0.025
< 0.105
> 0.072
» 0.004
> 0.076
A2-60
-------
TABLE A2-15. SS16 - BOILER FLUE GAS SUMMARY
(continued)
Subs tan c«
(Concentrations corrected to 7% O2)
V<
3 ladle organic compound*
Vinyl chloride
Methyl chlorida
Trans-1 ,2-dtehloroethene
Cis-1 ,2-dichtofoethene
Chloroform . __
1.1,1 - Trichloroethane
Carbon tetrachloride
Benzene
1.2-Oichloroethane
Triehtoroelhene
Toluene
1.1. 2 -Trichloroethane
Tetrachloroethene
1 .2 - Dibromoethan«
Chlorobenzeno
Ethylbenzene
M-/P-Xylene
O-Xylene
1 .3 - Dichlorobenzene
1 ,4 • Dichlorobenzene
1 ,2 - Dichlorobenzene
Trace metala
Arsenic
Barium
Beryllium
Cadmium
Chromium (total)
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Phosphorus
Selenium
Silver
Thallium
Tin
Zinc
Units
ng/dscm
ng/dscm
ug/dscm
ng/dscm
ng/dscm
ng/dscm
ng/dscm
ng/dscm
ng/dscm
ng/dscm
ng/dscm
ng/dscm
ng/dscm
ng/dscm
ng/dscm
ng/dscm
ng/dscm
ng/dscm
ng/dscm
ng/dscm
ng/dscm
CONDITION 3 - WASTE OIL
Flag Run1|Flag Run2|Flag Run 3
"2 ND 1.01
"2 < 79
"2 NO 1.01
"2 ND 1.01
"2 ND 1.01
"2 ND 1.01
**2 ND 1.01
"2 < 128
"2 < 1.01
**2 ND 1.01
**2 BQL 8.3
~2 ND 1.01
"2 < 224
"2 NO 1.01
"2 ND 1.01
"2 ND 1.01
"2 ND 1.01
~2 ND 1.01
"2 NO 1.01
**2 ND 1.01
"2 NO 1.01
ND 1.00
< 106
ND 1.00
NO 1.00
ND 1.00
< 1.47
ND 1.00
"3 ALR 203
NO 1.00
< 1.00
< 26.6
NO 1.00
< 4.82
ND 1.00
NO 1.00
ND 1.00
NO 1.00
NO 1.00
"3 ND 1.00
~3 NO 1.00
"3 ND 1.00
ng/dscm
ng/dscm
ng/dscm
ngVdscm
ng/dscm
ng/dscm
ng/dscm
ng/dscm
ng/dscm
ng/dscm
ng/dscm
ng/dscm
ng/dscm
ng/dscm
ng/dscm
ng/dscm
ng/dscm
40 < 3.6
40 ND 3.40
40 < 0.85
40 ND 0.03
40 ND 0.34
40 < 0.48
40 < 0.75
40 < 2.7
40 5.0
40,22 < 0.04
40 < 0.61
40 < 3.9
40 NO 3.40
40 NO 0.34
40 NO 3.40
40 NO 3.40
40 9.7
40 < 5.8
40 ND 5.00
40 ,< 1.23
40 ND 0.05
40 ND 0.50
40 < 1.48
40 1.78
40 < 4.3
40 0.7
40 NO 0.08
40 < 0.88
40 < 6.8
40 NO 5.00
40 NO 0.50
40 ND 5.00
40 < 5.00
40 9.3
ND roo
< 115
NO H .00
ND 1.00
NO H.33
f 2.68
< 1.20
°°4 8
< 11.10
< 2.55
< 11.3
< 11 .54
< 8.47
NO 1 .00
ND 1.00
< 2.40
ND 1.00
NO 1.00
**4 ND -1.00
"4 ND 1.00
"4 ND 1.00
40 < 6.1
40 NO 4.86
40 < 1.43
40 ND 0.05
40 < 2.14
40 0.85
40 2.04
40 < 4.9
40 < 0.6
40 < 0.08
40 < 0.78
40 8.3
40 ND 4.86
40 ND 0.49
40 ND 4.86
40 NO 4.86
40 54.4
Ma|orgasspecim(dry, 7%O2)
(Oxygen (O2)
Carbon dtatide (CO2)
(Moisture
vol. %
vol. %
vol.%
7.75
8.97
10.2
7.29
8.89
10.8
7.43
3.94
10.9
Minor gas specl«« (dry, 7% O2)
Total hydrocarbons ( methane equivalent)
Hydrogen chloride (HO)
Carbon monoxide (CO)
Nitrogen oxide* (NOx)
Sulfur dioxide (SO2)
ppmv
mg/dscm
ppmv
ppmv
ppmv
1.1
ND 0.59
'4
62.8
2.3
1.1
NO 0.67
1
63.9
1.5
2.4
1.16
2
63.9
0.5
Parttculate and VMM* emfsslona
Partculata (7% O2)
Opacity
mg/dscm
%
0.02
0
21 0.03
0
21 2.92
0
"1 refers to flags 42(3.4).43; ~2 refers to flags 8(3), 15(3). 18(2);
"3 refers to flags 10(1,2.4). 11(3); -4 refers to flag 10(1 A3.4);
••CondrHon 3 Run 2 value excluded from average because ALR
A2-61
-------
TABLE A2-16. SS18 - HEAT EXCHANGER RESIDUE SUMMARY
Substance
ro
30
Ch
Units
Condition 1
Waste water
-lag Composite
Conditions
Waste oil
:lag Composite
tat stream How rat*
Rum
Run 2
Run3
Average
kg/hr
kg/hr
kg/hr
kg/hr
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
vchlorlnattd blph*nyl» (PCB)
Monochtorobiphenyi (total)
Dlchtorobiphonyl (total)
Trichtorobiphenyt (total)
Tetrachlorobiphenyl (total)
Pentachkxobiphenyt (total)
Hexachlorobiphonyl (total)
Heptachlorobiphenyl (total)
Octachtorobiphenyl (total) '
Nonachlorobiphenyl (total) i
Decachlorobiphenyl (total)
Total PCBs (Tri-Deca) including ND«
Total PCBs (Mono-Deca) including NDs ;
Total PCBs (Tri-Deca) excluding NDs
Total PCBs (Monc-D«ca) excluding NDs
jig/L
V&-
ug/L
HgA.
ug/L
ugA.
ug/L
ug^
ug/L
ug/L
ugrt.
jig/L
\ngH.
ugrt.
SQL 0.035
1.1
2.3
2.6
BQL 1.1
BQL 0.16
BQL 0.03
NO 0.97
NO 0.24
NO 0.14
< 7.54
< 8.67
> 6.19
> 7.32
NO 0.33
BQL 0.64
BQL 1.6
BQL '- 2
BQL 0.5
BQL 0.15
BQL 0.01
NO 4
NO 1
NO 0.56
< 9.82
< 10.79
> 4.26
> 4.90
lorob«nzene« and chlorophenola
1 ,2-Diehlorobenzene
1.3-Dichlorobenzene \
1 ,4-DIchlorobenzena
Total dtehtorooenzenes
12,3-Tricrilorooenzen* :
1 ,3.5-Trichlorobenzerw
12.4-Trichlorobenzeo*
Total trichlorobenzene*
1 2.3,4-Tetrachlorotoenzene
1 2.3.5- and/or 1 2.4,5-Tetrachlorobenzen®
Total totrachlorob«nzene<
Pentaehlorobenzen* :
Hexachlorobenzen*
2,3-Dichloropneno<
2,4-Dlchlorophenol :
2.5-DIchloropnenol
2,6-Dichlorophenol ;
3.4-Dichlorophenol :
3,5>0ichlorophenol
Total cSehlorophenolc ;
2,3,4-Trichlorophenoi
2.3.5-Trichlorophenol
2.3,&-Trichloroph«nol
2.4,5-Trichlorophflnol :
2,4,8-Trichlorophwioi :
Total trichloropn«nola
2.3.4.5,- and/or 2.3.4.6-Tetrachlorophenol
2,3.5,8-Tetraehlofopheoot :
Total tefirachlorophenols
Pentachlorophenoi
Total CB
Total CP
«»"-
Hg/L
»&•
ngrt.
ugA.
ug/L
ug/U
uoA
ug'L
ug/L
H9/L
ugO,
ngfl-
ogrt.
(iflA,
HS^
U9«-
(iS^-
«g4,
ug^,
US"-
H9«.
(igrt.
ngfl.
(ig/L
ug/L
ngrt.
ug/L
uaA.
U30.
WO.
uoA.
NO 0.25
NO 0.25
NO 0.25
NO 0.75
NO 0.25
NO 0.25
NO 0.25
NO 0.75
NO 0.25
NO 0.51
NO • 0.76
NO 0.25
NO 0.25
NO 0.25
NO 0.25
NO 025
NO 0.25
NO Q3S
NO 025
NO 1.5
NO 0.25
NO 025
NO 0.25
NO 0.25
NO 025
NO 12S
NO 0.51
NO 02£
NO 0.7«
NO 0.2J
NO 2.7(
NO 3.7C
NO 1 .2
NO 1.2
NO 1.2
NO 3.6
NO 1.2
NO 12
NO 1.2
NO 3.6
NO 1.2
NO 2.3
NO 3.5
NO 1.2
NO 1.2
NO 12
NO 1.2
NO 1.2
NO 12
NO 12
NO 1.2
NO 7.2
NO 1.2
NO 12
NO 12
NO 12
NO 12
NO 6
NO 2.3
NO 12
NO 3.5
NO 12
NO 13.1
NO 17.9
A2-62
-------
TABLE A2-16. SS18 - HEAT EXCHANGER RESIDUE SUMMARY
(continued)
-Substance
Polycyctlc aromatic hydrocarbon* (PAH)
Naphthalene
2-MethylnaphthaIene
2-CI-Naphthalene
Acenaphthylene
Acanapthene
Fluorene
Phenanthrene
Anthracene
Fluoranthene
Pyrene
Benzo (a) anthracarw
Chrysene
Bonzo (b) fluoranthene
Benzo (k) fluoranthene
Banzo (a) pyrana
Banzo (a) pyrana
Perylene
Indano (1 ,2,3-cd) pyrana
Dibenz (a.h) anthracana
Banzo (g.h.i) parylana
Total PAHs including NO* ~
Total PAH* excludng NO*
Units
Condition 1
Wasta watar
Flag Composite
ng/u
Jigt-
ng/t.
ug/L
ng/i.
US"-
ng/L
^gfl-
H9rt-
ng/L
^p/L
HO/L
fig's.
USA-
Hg/L
v&t-
lig/L
jigfl.
Kgrt-
H9t
vg/L
ust
Dtoxins and furans
2378 TCOD
12378 PaCDD
1 23478 HxCOO
123678 HxCOO
123789 HxCOO
1 234678 HpCDO
OCDO
2378 TCDF
12378 PeCDF
23478 PeCDF
123478 HxCDF
123678 HXCDF
234678 HxCDF
123789 HxCDF
1 234678 HpCOF
1234789 HpCDF
OCOF
TCDO (total)
PaCOD (total)
HxCDO (total)
HpCOO (total)
TCDF (total)
PeCDF (total)
HxCDF (total)
HpCOF (total)
Total doxins (by Isomar) inducing NOe
Total furans (by isomar) {ndudng ND»
Total doxlns/lurans (by isomer) inc NDs
Total doxins (by i*ornar) exdudng NOt
Total furan* (by isomar) axdudng NOs
Total doxins/furans (by isomar) axdudng NDc
ng/L
ng/L
ng/L
ng/U
"9"-
ng/L
ng/L
ng/L
ng/L
ng/L
ng/L
ng/L
ng/L
ng/L
ng/L
ng/L
ng/L
ngO.
ng/L
ng/L
ng/L
ng/L
ng/L
ng/L
ng/L
ng/L
ng/L
ng/L
ng/L
ng/L
ng/L
NO 0.25
NO 0.25
NO 0.25
NO 0.25
NO 0.25
NO 0.25
NO 0.25
ND 0.25
SQL 0.4
BQL 0.3
NO 0.25
NO 0.25
BQL 0.3
ND 0.25
ND 0,25
ND 0.25
ND 0.25
ND 0.25
NO 0.25
NO 0.25
< 5.25
> 1.00
Conditions
Wasta oil
Flag Composite
21
ND 1.2
NO 1.2
NO 1.2
ND 1.2
ND 1.2
ND 1.2
ND 1.2
ND 1.2
ND 1.2
ND 1.2
NO 1.2
ND 1.2
NO 1.2
ND 1.2
ND 1.2
ND 12
ND 1.2
NO 1.2
ND 1.2
< 43.8
> 21.0
NO 0.001
NO 0.001
ND 0.001
0.002
0.001
0.03
0.17
0.01
0.003
0.005
0.003
F 0.001
0.001
0.001
0.008
ND 0.001
0.01
0.003
ND 0.001
0.02
0.06
0.04
0.02
0.01
0.02
< 021
< 0.04
< 0.25
> 020
> 0.04
> 0.25
ND 0.03
NO 0.01
NO 0.004
ND 0.02
NO 0.01
0.07
0.39
ND 0.03
ND 0.04
NO 0.02
0.004
ND 0.003
0.006
NO 0.010
NO 0.015
NO 0.003
0.02
ND 0.03
ND 0.18
ND 0.09
0.07
ND 1.10
ND 0.90
0.02
0.01
< 0.53
< 0.15
< 0.68
> 0.46
> 0.03
> 0.49
A2-63
-------
TABLE A2-16. SS18 - HEAT EXCHANGER RESIDUE SUMMARY
(continued)
Substance
Tn
Ml)
Units
Condition 1
Waste water
Flag Composite
Condition 3
Waste oil
Flag Composite
ice metals
Antimony ^ • :
Arsenic
Barium
Beryllium
Cadmium
Chromium (total)
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel !
Phosphorus ,
Selenium
Silver ;
Thallium
Tin
Zinc
LLG/L
ttG/L,
H£^»
UQ^L
UG/L.
UQ/L,
ug/L
ng/L
u.Q/1,.
JJ.Q/L
LIG/L
UCe/L
ug/L
NO 100
NO 100
750
NO 10
NO 10
23
NO 10
80
260
1
10
260
NO 100
NO 10
NO 100
NO 100
900
NO 100
NO 100
640
NO 10
NO 10
18
61
51
300
0.37
32
640
NO 100
NO 10
NO 100
NO 100
2200
icellaneous
Total organic carbon
Total sulfur (as S)
Organic halogens (as chloride)
Inorganic halogens (as chloride)
Hexavalent chromium
ppmw
ppbw
ppmw
ppmw
22.8
31 0.01
3.30 628
2400
NO 0.01.
3 53.3
31 0.01
3,30 30500
2300
NO 0.01
A2-64
-------
TABLE A2-17. SS19 - TDU OFF-GAS SUMMARY
Substance
Units
Condition 2 - Soil
Flag Run 1| Flag Run 2
Polychtorlnatod biphtnyla (PCS)
Ch
Monochlorobiphanyl (total)
Dichlorobiphanyl (total)
Trichtorobiph«nyl (total)
Tatrachlorobiphonyl (total)
Pentachlorobiphonyl (total)
Hexactiforobiphonyl (total)
Haptachlorobiphonyl (total)
Oetachlorobipnanyl (total)
Nonachlorobipnanyl (total)
0«cachlorobiphonyl (total)
Total PCBs (Tri-Doca)
Total PCBs (Mono-Oeca)
ng/dscm
)ig/dscm
jig/dscm
tig/dscm
^g/dscrn
u,g/dscm
u,g/dscm
(ig/dscm
u,g/dscm
u.g/dscm
(ig/dscm
lig'dscm
490
1900
5220
4620
2180
247
38.6
4.38
4.78
30.3
12300
14700
118
615
2120
2010
710
87.8
14.1
1.39
2.06
5.75
4960
5690
orobwuanaa and chtorophmols
1 .2 Dichlorob0nzena
1.3 - Ofohtorobonzen*
1.4 - Dtehlorobsnzan*
2,3 • Oichloroph«nol
1 ,2,3 • Trichlorob»nz*n»
1 ,2.4- Trichtorobenzana
1 .3.5 - Trichkxobenzena
1.2,3.4-T«t7achlorob«nzen«
1 .2,3,5 - Tatrachlorobanzan*
1 ,2,4,5 • TatracnlorobanzerM
'antachlorobanzana
H0xachlorob0nz«na
2 • Chlorophanol ,
3.4 • Chlorophonol
2,4 • Dichkxop+wno)
2.5 • Oichlorophanol
2.8 • Oichlofoptwnol
3,4 » Oichloroph«nol
3,5 - Dichtorophanol .
2,3,4 - Trichtorophanol
2,3.5 - Trichkxoptwnol
2.3.6 -Trichkxophanol
2,4,5 - Trichlorophanol
2,4,6 - Trichloroph0nol
2.3.4,5 - Tatrachkxophanol
2.3.5.6 • Tetrachloroptenoi
Pentachloroph«nol
Total CBs including NO*
Total CPs including NO*
Total CBs oxcludng NDs
Total CPs excluding NOs
ng/dacm
{ig/dscm
u.g/dscm
u,o/dscm
u.o/dscm
ng/dscm
^o/dscm
u,g/dscm
lig/dscm
^g/dsan
^g/dscm
Hudson
jig/dson
u.g/d3cm
ng/dscm
ng/dscm
^9/ds«n
(igMscm
H9/dsan
(ig/dson
u,g/dscm
>ig/dscm
ug/dacm
ng/dscm
ng/dscm
u.g/dscm
jig/dscrn
ug/dscm
ng/dscm
ng/dscm
tig/dscm
17200
13500
11500
ND 589
14500
34500
4930
37300
43000
30900
E 112000
E 74369
E 953
ND 193
451
507
465
4000
E 1370
ND 752
NO 873
NO 709
ND 654
ND 686
ND 564
ND 623
E 2453
< 394000
< 15800
> 394000
> 10200
3960
13010
6100
ND 255
E 1900
5370
E 1030
3410
3940
3860
25000
9792
ND 168
ND 78
ND 195
ND 219
ND 201
ND 173
NO 166
ND 291
NO 337
ND 274
ND 253
ND 265
NO 218
ND 241
ND 322
< 77400
ND 3660
> 77400
aH NO
A2-65
-------
TABLE A2-17. SS19-TDU OFF-GAS SUMMARY
(continued)
Substance
Units
Condition 2 - Soil
Flag Run 1 1 Flag Run 2
Dioxlns and furana
Vo
2378 TCDO
12378 PeCDD
123478 HxCDO
123678 HxCDD
123789 HxCDO
1234678 HpCDD
OCDD
2378 TCOF
12378 PoCDF
23478 PeCDF
123478 HxCDF
123878 HXCDF
234678 HxCDF
123789 HxCOF
1234678 HpCDF
1234789 HpCDF
OCOF
TCOD (Total)
PeCDO (Total)
HxCDO (Total)
HpCDO (Total)
TCOF (Total)
PeCDF (Totai)
HxCDF (Total)
HpCDF (Total)
Total doxms (by isomer)
Total furan* (by !*omer)
Total dioxins/furans (by Isomer)
iatlte organic compounds
Vinyl cntoride
Mathyl chloride
Trans-1 ,2-dicnlof oetnene
Cls-1.2-olchloroetr>ene
Chlorofonn
1.1,1-Trichtoroetnane
Carbon tetracMoride
Benzene
1,2-DlcW
-------
TABLE A2-18. SS20 - MOLTEN BATH SUMMARY
Substance
Units
Condition 2 - Soil
Run 1
Run 2
Traco metals
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Beryllium
Cadmium
Chromium (total)
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Phosphorus
Selenium
Silver
Thallium
Iron
Zinc
ppm
ppm
ppm
ppm
ppm
ppm
ppm
ppm
ppm
ppm
ppm
ppm
ppm
ppm
ppm
ppm
ppm
NO 30
NO 20
ND 1
NO 0.02
ND 1
ND 2
98
160
ND 1
ND 0.4
ND 2
380
ND 20
ND 1
ND 30
40
12
ND 30
ND 30
ND 1
ND 0.02
ND 1
150
99
ND 10
2
ND 0,4
110
370
ND 20
ND 1
ND 30
930
6
A2-67
-------
TABLE A2-19. SS22 - SCRUBBER LIQUOR SUMMARY
Substance
Units
Condition 1 - waste water
Flag Run 1 Flag Run 2 Flag Run 3
Total strewn flow rat*
kg/hr
Polychlorinated blphenyls (PCS) - BOR
Monochtorobiphenyl (total)
Dichtorobiphenyl (total)
Trichtorobiphenyl (total)
Tetrachiorobiphenyl (total)
Pentmchtorobiphenyl (total)
Htxachlorobiphenyl (total)
Heptachlorobipnenyl (total)
Octachlorobipnenyl (total)
Nonacrtlorobiphenyl (total)
Decachlorobiphenyl (total)
Total PCSs (Tri-Deca) including NDs
Total PCBs (Mono-Decs) including NOe
Total PCBs (Tri-Deca) excluding ND<
Total PCBs (Mono-Deca) excluding NDs
ngfl-
ng/U
tigt
Hg/L
j»s«.
ngfl.
jigfl.-
tig/L
ng/U
^gt
HgA.
ng/i.
ngrt.
ngt
Polychlorinated blpnenyls (PCS) • EOR u.g/L
Monochlorobtphenyt (total)
Dichforobiphenyt (total)
TrichtoroWphenyl (total)
Tetrachlofobiphenyl (total)
Pentachkxobiprtenyi (total)
Hexachlorobiphertyl (total)
Hoptachlorobipnenyl (total)
Octachlorobipnenyl (total)
Nonachlorobiphenyl (total)
Decachlorobiphenyl (total)
Total PCBs (Tri-Deca) including NDs
Total PCBs (Mono-Dec*) including NDs
Total PCBi (Tri-Deca) excluding NDs
Total PCBs (Mono-Deca) excluding NDs
ng/L
tigfl=
ngfl.
ngt
^9""
t»s«.
MSfl.
ng/L
ngfl.
ng/t-
ngrt.
vgfL
ng/L
ug/L
PoJycycllc aromatic hydrocarbons (PAH) - BOR
Acenaphthene
Fluorene
Phenanthrene
Anthracene
Ruoranthene
Pyrene
Benz (a) anthracene
Chryserw
Benzo (b) fluoranthene
Benzo (k) fluoranthene
Benzo (e) pyren*
Benzo (a) pyren*
Peryleoe
Indeno (1,2,3-cd) pyren*
Dibcnz (a,h) anthracene
Benzo (g,n,I) peryterM
Naphthaiww
2-Methybiaphthalen*
2-Chloronaphthaiene
Acenaphthlerw
Total PAHs
v&l-
ngt
ng/U
H9A-
Wt
figfl.
^gA-
ngft.
ng/L
Hgrt.
^g^.
^9"-
vigrt-
US/I.
ngrt.
jigrt.
jtgrt.
jigfl.
ng/U
M.gt.
H9/L
IN 22.50) IN 5.03) IN 5.03
ND 0.3
NO 1.2
ND 2.4
ND 8.4
ND 9.2
ND 8.4
ND 7.2
ND 3.6
ND 0.9
ND 0.5
ND 40.6
ND 42.1
afl ND
all ND
ND 0.3
ND 1.2
ND 2.4
ND 8.4
NO 9.2
ND 8.4
ND 7.2
ND 3.6
ND 0.9
ND 0.5
NO 40.6
NO 42.1
aH NO
aM ND
BQL 0.01
BQL 0.03
BQL 0.09
BQL 0.13
SQL 0.01
ND 8.4
ND 7.2
ND 3.6
ND 0.9
NO 0.6
< 20.fi
< 20.9
> 023
> 027
BQL 0.23
BQL 0.2
ND 2.4
BQL 024
BQL 0.02
ND 8.4
ND 7.2
NO 3.6
NO 0.9
NO 0.5
< 23.3
« 23.7
» 0.28
> 0.54
37 NO 0.26
37 BQL 1.6
37 69
37 S.1
37 44
37 21
37 BQL 0.6
37 BQL 1.1
37 BQL 1.1
37 BQL 0.3
37 BQL 0.7
37 BQL 0.3
37 ND 026
37 BQL 0.4
37 NO 026
37 BQL 0.7
37 2.6
37 ND 0.26
37 NO 026
37 4
37 < 154
37 BQL 13
37 69
37 950
37 94
37 BQL 870
37 BQL 8401
37 §1
37 110
37 100
37 BQL 31
37 100
37 170
37 63
37 82
37 NO 4.3
37 170
37 BQL 710
37 ND 4.8
37 NO 4.8
37 1000
37 < 5240
A2-68
-------
TABLE A2-19. SS22 - SCRUBBER LIQUOR SUMMARY
(continued)
Substance
Po
Ch
Units
>tg"-
j»g/i-
Hgfl-
ng/>-
ng^-
jtg/L
jigrt.
tig/L
ng/i.
HQrt-
lorobanzane* and chtorophenols -BOR
1 ,2-Dichlorobenzena
1,3-Dichlorobenzena
1 ,4-Dichlorobanzena
Total dtehtorobenzene*
1 ,2,3-Trichlorobenzena
1,3,5-Trichlorobenzen*
1 ,2.4-Trichlorobenzan«
Total trichlorobenzenes
1 ,2,3,4-Tatrachlorobenzane
1 ,2,3.5- and/or1 ,2,4,5-Tetrachlorobanzano
Total tatrachlorobenzorwa
Pentachkxobenzena
Haxacntorobanzena
2,3-Dichlorophanol
2,4-Olchlorophenol
2,5-Oichlorophenol
2.6-DichlofOphanot
3,4-Dichlorophenol
3,5-Dichlocophenol
Total dtehloropnenols
2,3,4-Trichlorophenol
2,3,5-Trichlorophanol
2,3,6-Trichlorophanoi
2,4,5-Tricriloroprwnoi
2.4,6-TriCfiloroprMnoi
Total trichkxophenoJt
2,3,4,5,- and/or 2,3,4,6-Tetrachlofopnenol
2.3,5,ft-T«trachloroph«nol
Total totrachlorophanols '
Pentachkxopheno)
Total C8
Total CP
wfl-
V&L
ngrt.
^gfl-
ttg/L
Hg/L
USA-
ng/L
jig/U
ng/L
HS'L
ugA.
VQfl-
ngn.
ngfl-
H9/L
mst
Hfflrt-
ng/L
V-Qfl-
MSrt.
ngrt.
ng/L
ng/L
ngrt.
U9t-
ttg/i-
w»t
ug/L
US/L
jigA.
ug/L
Coriditksn 1 - waste water
Flag Run 1 F ag Run 2 Flag Run 3
37 ND 1
37 SQL 1.6
37 67
37 SQL 5.5
37 43
37 27
37 ND 1
37 SQL 1.3
37 SQL 1.1
37 NO 1
37 ND 1
37 ND 1
37 ND 1
37 NO 1
37 ND 1
37 ND 1
37 SQL 3.2
37 ND 1
37 ND 1
37 SQL 4.4
37 < 165.1
37 > 155
37 250
37 SQL 1800
37 18000
37 SQL 2900
37 13000
37 16000
37 1200
37 SQL 2300
37 SQL 16(30
37 640
37 SQL 1700
37 SQL 3000
37 1000
37 6<30
37 NO 20
37 1000
37 290130
37 3:30
37 ND 120
37 17000
37 < 111000
37 > 111000
1 ND 0.26
1 ND 0.26
1 ND 0.26
1 ND 0.78
1 ND 0.26
1 ND 0.26
1 ND 0.26
1 ND 0.78
1 ND 0.26
1 ND 0.53
1 ND 0.79
1 ND 0.26
1 ND 0.26
1 ND 0.26
1 ND 0.26
1 ND 0.26
1 ND 0.26
1 ND 0.26
1 ND 0.26
1 ND 1.56
1 ND 0.26
1 ND 056
1 NO 0.26
1 ND 0.26
1 ND 0.26
1 ND 1.3
1 ND 0.53
1 ND 0.26
1 ND 0.79
1 ND 0.26
1 ND 2.87
1 ND 3.91
NO 4.8
ND 4.8
ND 4.8
ND 14.4
NO 4.8
NO 4.8
ND 4.8
NO 14.4
NO 4.8
ND 9.5
ND 14.3
ND 4.8
ND 4.8
ND 4.8
ND 4.8
NO 4.8
NO 4.8
NO 4.8
ND 4.8
ND 28.8
ND 4.8
NO 4.8
ND 4.8
ND 4.8
NO 4.8
NO 24
ND 4.8
NO 4.8
ND 9.6
ND 4.8
ND 52.7
ND 67.2
A2-69
-------
TABLE A2-19. SS22 - SCRUBBER LIQUOR SUMMARY
(continued)
Substanca
ch
Vo
Units
Conditksn 1 • waste water
Flag Run 1 Flag Run 2 Flag Run 3
lor obwizariM and chlorophanols -EOR
1 ,2-Oichlorobanzena
1 ,3-Dicfilorobanzena
1 ,4-Dichtorobenzene
Total otchlorobanzonas
1 ,2,3-Trichlof obanzena
1 ,3.5-TrichlOfOb*nzana
1 .2.4-Trichlorob*nzon«
Total trichlorobanzanas
1,2,3,4-TetracWorobanzan*
1 5,3.5- and/or 1 .2.4,5-Tetrachlorobenz«rt«
Total tetrachtorobanzena*
Pontachkxobenzsna
Hexachlorobenzen*
2,3-Dichloropnwiol
2,4-0!chloroph«nol
2,5-Dichloroprwnol
2,6-DIchlorophanol
3,4-Dichlorophsnol
3.5-OichIoroph«nol
Total dchlorophenols
2.3,4-Trichloroprwnol
2.3.5-Trichloroph«nol
2,3,6-TrJchIofophooo)
2,4,5-Trichlorophonoi
2,4,$-Trichloroph«nol
Total trichkxophanols
2,3.4,5,- and/or 2.3.4.6-Tatr«chloroph«nol
2,3,5,6-TotrachIofophwiol
Total tetrachlofophanoU
Pontachloroph«nol
Total CB
Total CP
IJigA.
tig/i.
ugA,
_jig/L
H9/I. |
W&,
wafr-
H9rt-
ngfl.
KS^-
_JS"-
v*sfl-
_jig/L
H90.
ttoA.
P&- \
U9/L
jio/L
Hgft,i
_jig/L '
jig/Li
HS«-.
jto/L
Si^L
ugA.
ng/L
noyu
ugA.
tig/t
uga.
ng/L
ugo,
NO 1
ND 1
ND 1
ND 3
ND 1
NO 1
NO 1
ND 3
ND 1
NO 2
ND 3
ND 1
ND 1
NO
NO
ND
ND
NO
ND
ND 6
ND
NO
NO
ND 1
ND 1
ND 5
ND 2
ND 1
NO 3
NO 1
ND 11
NO 15
ND 20
ND 20
NO 20
ND 30
ND 20
ND 20
ND 20
ND 60
ND 20
ND 40
ND 60
ND 20
ND 20
ND 20
ND 20
ND 20
ND 20
ND 20
ND 20
ND 120
ND 20
ND 20
ND 20
ND 20
ND 20
ND 100
NO 40
ND 20
ND 60
ND 2.0
NO 220
ND 300
atila organic compounds - BOR
Vinyl chtorkto
Mothyl chloride
Trans-1 ,2-dfcrrforo«th«n«
C!9-1.2-dicritoro«th«n«
Chloroform
1,1,1-Trichtoroetharw
Carbon tatrachlorid*
Bonzen*
1,2-Dlchloro«than«
Trichtoroathao*
Toluorw
1,1.2- Trfchtofo«man« '
Totr«chloro*th«rw
1 H - Dibromoathan*
ChhxobMizarw
Ethytbanzarw
M-/P-Xyten«
O-Xylorw
1 ,3 - DIchlorobcnzarM
1 ,4 - Dtehkxobanzen*
1 .2 - Olchlorobanzarw
ngrt.
H9/L
|AOA.
W*-'.
H9A,
jigt
f*8t
HO/L
ng/L
rat
^gt
^oyu
ugA.
us*.
H9t
ngrt.
ngrt.
^g/L
f*gt:
(igA.
U9/L
3,39 ND 2
3.39 SQL 8
3.39 ND 2
3.39 ND 2
3.39 NO 2
3,39 NO 2
3,39 NO 2
3,39 ND 2
3,39 NO 2
3,39 ND 2
3,39 NO 2
3,39 NO 2
3.39 ND 2
3.39 NO 2
3,39 NO 2
3,39 ND 2
3.39 NO 2
3,39 NO 2
3,39 NO 2
3,39 ND 2
3.39 NO 2
3 NO 2
3 ND 2
3 NO 2
3 ND 2
3 ND 2
3 ND 2
3 ND 2
3 35
3 NO 2
3 NO 2
3 NO 2
3 ND 2
3 ND 2
3 NO 2
3 ND 2
3 ND 2
3 ND 2
3 ND 2
3 ND 2
3 ND 2
3 NO 2
A2-70
-------
TABLE A2-19. SS22 • SCRUBBER LIQUOR SUMMARY
(continued)
Substance
Volatile organic compounds - EOfi
Vinyl chloride
Methyl chloride
Irani- 1 ,2-dichloroethene
Ci8-1 ,2-dichloroethen«
Chloroform
1.1.1 • Trichloroethane
Carbon tetrachloride
Benzene
1.2-Oichloroetnane
Trichloroethene
Toluene
1.1,2-Trichloroetnane
Tetrachloroethene
1 ,2 • Oibromoethane
Chlorobenzene
Ethylbenzene
M-/P-Xy!ene
O-Xytone
1 ,3 « Dtehlorobenzene
1,4- Dichlorobenzene
1 ,2 - 0!chlorobenzen«
Units
Condition 1 - waste water
Flag Run 1 Flag Run 2 Flag Run 3
ug/L
ug/L
ng/L
ng/L
ng/L
ng/L
K9"-
ngfl.
ng/L
ug/L
M^L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
M/L
ug/L
ug/L
(ig/L
ug/L
ug/L
ng/L
39 NO 2
39 SQL 6
39 NO 2
39 NO 2
39 NO 2
39 NO 2
39 NO 2
39 SQL 4
39 NO 2
39 NO 2
39 NO 2
39 NO 2
39 NO 2
39 NO 2
39 NO 2
39 NO 2
39 NO 2
39 NO 2
39 NO 2
39 NO 2
39 NO 2
btoxine and furane - BOfl
2378-TCDO
12378-PeCOD
123478-HxCDD
123678-HxCDD
123789-HxCDD
1234878-HpCDO
OCOD
2378-TCDF
12378-PeCOF
23478-PeCDF
123478-HxCOF
123678-HxCOF
123789-HxCDF
234678-HxCDF
1234878-HpCDF
1234789-HpCDF
OCOF
Total TCOO
Total PeCOO
Total HxCOO
Total HpCOO
Total TCDF
Total PeCDF
Total HxCDF
Total HpCOF
Total PCOO (by Isomer)
Total PCDF (by isomer)
Total PCDD/PCDF (by Isonw)
ng/L
ng/L
ng/L
ng/L
ng/L
ng/L
ng/L
ng/L
ng/L
ng/L
ng/L
ng/L
ng/L
ng/L
ng/L
ng/L
ng/L
ng/L
ng/L
ng/L
ng/L
ng/L
ng/L
ng/L
ng/L
ng/L
ng/L
ng/L
NO 0.0004
NO 0.001
NO 0.001
NO 0.001
NO 0.001
0.002
F 0.02
NO 0.001
NO 0.002
NO 0.001
NO 0.001
NO 0.0004
NO 0.001
NO 0.001
NO 0.001
NO 0.001
0.002
0.004
NO 0.007
F 0.001
F 0.004
NO 0.04
NO 0.04
NO 0.01
NO 0.004
< 0.02
< 0.01
< 0.04
NO 0.02
NO 0.01
NO 0.02
NO 0.02
NO 0.01
0.06
0.32
NO 0.03
NO 0.01
NO 0.01
NO 0.02
NO 0.15
NO 0.02
NO 0.03
NO 0.06
0.01
0.05
NO 0.48
NO 0.18
NO 0.15
0.08
0.35
NO QZf
NO 0.88
0.01
< 0.46
.< 0.39
< 0.85
NO 100
NO 100
NO 100
NO 100
NO 100
NO 100
NO 100
6900
NO 100
NO 100
NO 100
NO 100
NO . 103
NO 1O9
NO 100
NO 100
NO 100
. NO 100
NO 100
NO 100
NO 100
A2-71
-------
TABLE A2-19. SS22
- SCRUBBER LIQUOR SUMMARY
(continued)
Substance
Units
ConcStion 1 - waste water
Flag Run 1 Flag Run 2 flag Run 3
Dtoxln* and furana - EOR
fn
2378-TCDD
12378-PeCDO
123478-HxCOD
123678-HxCDO
123789-HxCDD
1234878-HpCDD
OCOD
2378-TCDF
12378-PeCDF
23478-PeCDF
123478-HxCDF
123678-HxCDF
123789-HxCDF
234678-HxCDF
1234678-HpCDF
1234789-HpCDF
OCOF
Total TCDD
Total PeCDD
Total HxCDO
Total HpCDD
Total TCOF
Total PeCDF
Total HxCDF
Total HpCDF
Total doxins (by isomer) including NO*
Total furans (by isomer) including ND<
Total doxins/furans (by isomer) inc NO*
Total doxins (by Isomer) exctudng NO*
Total furans (by Isomer) excluding NO*
Total doxins/furans (by Isomer) exdudng NO*
ce metals - BOR
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Beryllium
Cadmium
Chromium (total)
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Phosphorus
Selenium
Silver
Thallium
Tin
Zinc
ng/L
ng/L
ng/L
ng/L
ng/L
ng/L
ng/L 1
ng/L !
ng/L
ng/L
ng/L ,
ng/L
ng/L
ng/L
ng/L •
ng/L
ng/L
ng/L
ng/L,
ng/L1
ng/L
ng/L
ng/L
ng/L
ng/L'
ng/L
ng/L
ng/L
ng/L
ng/L
ng/L
NO 0.004
NO 0.003
NO 0.001
NO 0.003
NO 0.003
0.02
0.14
NO 0.002
NO 0.003
NO 0.001
NO 0.002
NO 0.002
NO 0.01
NO 0.01
0.01
NO 0.003
0.01
F 0.02
0.07
NO 0.02
0.02
0.01
0.01
0.005
0.01
< 0.17
< 0.05
< 0.22
> 0.16
> 0.02
> 0.18
NO 0.03
NO 0.03
NO 0.02
NO 0.00.1
NO 0.01
NO 0.02
F 0.18
NO 0.02
" NO 0.01
NO 0.02
NO 0.02
NO 0.03
NO 0.07
NO 0.03
NO 0.11
NO 0.02
NO 0.04
NO 0.75
NO 0.24
ND 0.09
NO 0.04
ND 0.72
NO 0.42
NO 0.58
NO 0.27
< 0.26
< 0.36
< 0.(S2
> 0.16
ai ND
> 0.16
lig'L:
1*9"-
!*g/i-'
HS^:
tis'i.
USA-
MSrt.
|ig4.
^g/L
jig/L
u,g/L
jigrt.
jigrt.
Hg/L
ftgrt-,
ug/L
ugd
NO 100
NO 100
48
NO 10
NO 10
NO 10
110
370
88
0.6
NO 10
NO 100
NO 100
NO 1C
NO 100
NO 100
1300
NO 100
NO 100
98
NO 10
NO 10
200
450
1200
440
1.1
71
190
NO 100
NO 10
NO 100
NO 100
430C
•
A2-72
-------
TABLE A2-19. SS22 - SCRUBBER LIQUOR SUMMARY
(continued)
Substance
Tr
Ml1
Ml
Hh
Hh
Ult
Ult
Units
ace meUIS • EOH
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium '
Beryllium
Cadmium '
Chromium (total)
Copper
Load
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Phosphorus
Selenium
Silver
Thallium
Tin
Zinc
•cellaneous - BOR
Total organic carbon
Chlorine .
Fluorine
Phosphate
Organic halogens (as chloride)
Inorganic halogens (as chloride)
Hexavalent chromium
H9/1-
M.9/L
H9/I-
ng/t
ug/L
HS/L
ng/L
H9/L
H9/L
ugA.
^9^.
tig/L,
H9/L
H9^.
M9/L
M9t
jfg/L
Condition 1 - waste water
Flag Run 1 Flag Hun 2 Flag Run 3
NO 100
NO 100
21
NO 10
NO 10
NO 10
23
68
13
NO 0.2
NO 10
NO 100
NO 100
NO 10
NO 100
NO 100
280
ppmw
wt%
wrt.%
wt%
ppbw
ppmw
ppmw
•NA
0.103
< 0.01
< 0.01
3 32.7
150
NO 0.01
3 NO 1
3 30.4
140
NO 0.01
NO 100
NO 100
«1
NO ' 10
NO 10
470
380
1500
3130
1.1
1(50
500
NO 11X1
NO 10
NO 100
NO 1IX}
7400
Bcellaneous - EOR
Total organic carbon
Chlorine
Fluorine
Phosphate
Organic halogens (as chloride)
Inorganic halogens (as chloride)
Hexavalont chromium
ppmw
wt%
wt%
wt%
ppbw
ppmw
ppmw
14.2
62.6
150
NO 0.01
3 1(1.3
0.19
< 0.01
< 0.01
62.2
2000
NO 0.01
ysical characteristics) - BOR
Density
PH
ysicai characteristics - EOR
Density
PH
g/cc
g/cc
1.02
7.9
0.99
11.4
0.98
9.9
0.97
9.4
Imate analysis - BOR
Carbon ,
Hydrogen
Nitrogen '
Total sulfur (as S)
Oxygen '
(mate analysis « EOR
Carbon
Hydrogen
Nitrogen
Total sulfur (as S)
Oxygen
wt%
wt%
wL%
wt%
wt%
5.03
12.59
0.01
0.004
82.3
0.001
wt%
wL%
wt%
wL%
wt%
0.004
0.71
2(3.2
< 0.01
0.003
73.0
A2-73
-------
TABLE A2-19. SS22 - SCRUBBER LIQUOR SUMMARY
(continued)
Substance
I Condition 2 - soil
Units Flag Run 1 I Flag Run 2
'otal stream flow rate
kg/hr
OUT 5.79
IN 8.72
•olvchlorlnated blohenvle (PCS) - BOB
>o
Po
Monochlorobiphenyt (total)
Dichkxobiphanyl (total)
Trichtorobiphenyl (total)
Tetrachlorobiphenyl (total)
Pentachtorobiphenyl (total) ;
Hexachlorobiphenyi (total) :
Heptachlorobiphenyl (total)
Octachlorobiphenyl (total) ;
Nonachlorobiphenyl (total)
Decachlorobiphenyl (total)
Total PCBs (Tri-Deca) including NOs
Total PCBs (Mono-Deca) including NDs ;
Total PCBs (Tri-Deca) excluding NDs
Total PCBs (Mono-Deca) excluding NDs
UQ/L
LICI/L
jAQ/i-
liG^L
IIQ/C
tioAc
LlQ/L
UO/L
uQ/L
UG/L
ItO^L
UG/L
BQL 0.04
BQL 0.07
BQL 0.15
BQL 0.14
BQL 4.71
ND 8.6
ND 7.4
ND 3.7
ND 0.92
ND 0.51
< 26.1
< 26.2
> 5.00
> 5.11
BQL 0.01
BQL 0.01
BQL 0.10
BQL 0.08
ND 9.5
ND 8.7
ND 7.4
BQL 0.01
ND 0.93
BQL 0.03
< 26.7
< 26.8
> 0.22
> 0.24
ychlortnated blphenyla (PCS) - EOR ugrt.
Monochlorobiphenyl (total) ;
Dlchkxobiphenyt (total)
Trichtorobiphenyl (total) ;
Tetrachlorobiphenyl (total)
Pentaehtorobiphenyl (total)
Hexachlorobiphenyi (total)
Heptachlorobiphenyl (total)
Octachtorobiphenyl (total)
Nonachlorobiphenyl (total)
Deeachlorobiphenyl (total)
Total PCBs (Tri-Deca) including NOs
Total PCBs (Mono-Oeca) including NDs
Total PCBs (Tri-Deca) excluding NDs
Total PCBs (Mono-Deca) excluding NDs
ug/L
ug/L
UO/Li
I&Q/^
ug/L
USA.
ug/L
BQL 0.01
BQL 0.01
BQL 0.10
BQL 0.08
ND 9.50
ND 8.7
ND 7.4
BQL 0.01
ND 0.93
BQL 0.03
< 26.7
< 26.8
> 020
> 022
Ivcvdlc aromatic hydrocarbons (PAH) - BOR
Acenaphthene
Fluorene
Phenanthrene
Anthracene
Fluoranthene
Pyrene •
Benz (a) anthracene
Chrysenc
Benzo (b) fluoranthene
Benzo (k) fluoranthene
Benzo (e) pyrene
Benzo (a) pyrene
Perylene
Indeno (1 2,3-cd) pyrene
Dlbenz (a,h) anthracene
Benzo (g.h.l) peryterw
Naphthalene
2-Methyinaphthalen«
2-CWoronaphthalen«
Acenaphthlene
Total PAHs i
ug/L
ug/U
LiQ/Li
uQAe
ug/L
LLQ/l»
UOAa
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
uct/L
liQ/L
il(Vj_
ug/L
ug/L
35 ND 20
35 NO 20
35 900
35 BQL 69
35 630
35 780
35 BQL 48
35 SQL 88
35 BQL 120
35 BQL 25
35 BQL 130
35 BQL 150
35 BQL 69
35 BQL 110
35 NO 2C
35 26C
35 41C
35 ND 2(
35 NO 2<
35 24(
35 < 412(
BQL 0.01
BQL 0.02
BQL 0.13
BQL 0.06
BQL 0.01
ND 8.1
ND 3.9
ND 3.5
NO 0.87
ND 0.48
< 20.1
< 20.1
> 0.20
> 0.23
35 NO 19
35 ND 19
35 730
35 BQL 72
35 630
35 790
35 BQL 44
35 BQL 85
35 BQL 130
35 ND 19
35 BQL 100
35 BQL 110
35 BQL 65
35 BQL 93
35 NO 19
35 BQL 150
35 390
35 NO 19
35 ND 19
35 200
35 < 3700
A2-74
-------
TABLE A2-19. SS22 - SCRUBBER LIQUOR SUMMARY
(continued)
Substance
Po
Ch
Units
Condition 2 - soil
Flag Run1 |Flag Run 2
lycydlc aromatic hydrocarbons (PAH) • EOR
Acanaphthana
Fluorena
Phananthrena
Anthracene
Fluoranthone
Pyrene
Benz (a) anthracene
Cnrysene
Benzo (b) fluoranthene
Benzo (k) fluoranthene
B«nzo (a) pyrene
Benzo (a) pyrana
Perylene
Indeno (1,2,3-cd) pyrane
Dibanz (a,h) anthracene
Bonzo (g,h,i) p«ryl«n«
Naphthalene
2-Methylnaphthalene .
2-Chloronaprith«lene
Aeenaphthlene
Total PAHs including NDs
Total PAHs excluding NDs
ng/L
V&L
H9rt-
jigfl.
>igA.
pgfl-
ItgfL
tig/t.
ng'L
HS/L
jig^.
>tg/i.
HS/L
Mgft.
jigt
Hgrt-
HgA
U9/L
ng^-
^9t-
»io/L
HS'L
35 SQL 33
35 BQL 89
35 BQL 2300
35 240
35 BQL 2300
35 BQL 2200
35 NO 19
35 260
35 300
35 BQL 51
35 220
35 270
35 BQL 160
35 210
35 NO 19
35 290
35 3900
35 NO 19
35 NO 19
35 1200
35 < 14100
35 > 14000
orobenzenae and chloropnenote -BOH
1 ,2-Dichlorobenzena
1 ,3-Dichlorobenzena
1 .4rDichlorobenzene
Total cichlorotoenzenes
1 ,2,3-Trichlorobenzene
1 .3,5-Trichlorobenzene
1j2.4-Trichlorobenzene
Total trichlorobenzenes
1 ,2,3,4- Tstrachlorobanzane
1.2.3,5- and/or 1 5,4.5-Tatrachtorobanzen*
Total tatrachlorobanzanas
Pantachkxobanzan*
Haxachlorobonzona
2,3-Oichloropn«nol
2.4-Olchloroph«noi
2,5-Diehlofophano)
2,S-Ofchloroph«ioi
3.4-Olchforophonol
3.5-Olchlorophanol
Total dchtorophenola
2,3,4-Trichlorophanol
2,3,5-Trichloroph«nol
2.3.8-TrichlocophwK)
2,4.S-TrichloroprMnoJ
2,4.6-Trichlorophanoi
Total tnchfcxoprwnols
2.3.4,5.- and/or 2.3.4.6-Tatrachloroph0nol
2,3.5,8-T«fracttio/L
tigA-
H9^
H90.
pg/L
H9/L
^gA.
tig/L
(ig/L
H9/U
^S^-
tio/L
(to/L
H9/L
ttgfl-
H9/L
^io/L
ug/t
^gft.
ttgfl-
n^t.
NO 20
NO 20
NO 20
NO 60
NO 20
NO 20
NO 20
NO 60
NO 20
NO 40
NO 60
NO 20
NO 20
NO 20
NO 20
NO 20
NO 20
NO 20
NO 20
NO 120
NO 20
NO 20
NO 20
NO 20
NO 20
NO 100
NO 40
NO 20
NO 60
NO 20
NO 220
NO 300
NO 19
NO 19
NO 19
NO 57
NO 19
NO 19
NO 19
NO 57
NO 19
NO 39
NO 58
NO 19
NO 19
NO 19
NO 19
NO 19
NO 19
NO 19
NO 19
NO 114
NO 19
NO 19
NO 19
NO 19
NO 19
NO 95
NO 39
NO 19
NO 58
NO 19
NO 210
NO 286
A2-75
-------
TABLE A2-19. SS22 - SCRUBBER LIQUOR SUMMARY
(continued)
Substance '
Ch
Vo
Units
Condition 2 • soil
=lag Run 1 IFlag Run 2
lorobanzanaa and chlorophanola -EOR <
1,2-Dlchlorobanzena
1.3-Dlchlorobenzena
1.4-Olchlorobanzena !
Total dchlorobanzenes
1 ,2,3-Trichlorobanzene
1.3.5-Trichlofobenzana
1.2.4-Trtehlorobanzana
Total trichlorobenzanas '
1,2,3,4-Tatrachlorobanzana ;
1 2.3.5- end/or 1 ,2,4,5-Tatrachlorob«nzona
Total tatrachlorobanzanas
Pantachlorobanzana
Haxachlorobanzena
2.3>Dlchlorophanol
2,4-DIchloroph«nol
2,5-Dichlorophanol :
2.8-DIchlorophanol
3,4-Dlchlorophanol
3.5-Dlchlorophanol i
Total dtehlorophanols i
2.3,4-Trichloropnanol
2.3.5-Trichloropbenol j
2,3,6-Trichtorophanol
2.4.5-Trichlorophanol
2.4.6-Trichlorophanol
Total trichtorophanolt
2,3.4.5.- and/or 2.3.4.S-Tatrachlorophanol j
2.3.5.6-Tatrachlorophanol
Total tetrachloroph«nol*
Pantachlorophanol
Total CB
Total CP
UstUa organic compound* - BOH
Vnyl chtorida
Mtthyl chtorida
Tran»-1 ^-dtohloroathana
CIs-LZ-dtehloroathana
Chloroform
1.1,1 -Trichkxoatharw
Cartxxi tatrachlorlda
Banzenc
l^-DlchloroatharM
Triohloroattiarw
Toluaoa
1.1,2-Trlchtoroathana ;
Tatrachloroathana
1 2 - Dlbromoathan*
Chtorobaozana
EthyttMnzan* ,
M-/P-XyJana ,
O-Xylaoa
1 ,3 • OlchlorobanzarM i
1 ,4 - Dtchlorobaozano
1 2. • Olchlorobenzano
pgn.
ft^L
vgfL
jio£.
ngt
»&L
ngn.
V&L
]ig/L
jigrt.
H9^-
H9^-
ng/t
ng'L
H9"-
tug/L
Jiflt
PQfl-
*&•
jtg/L
ngrt.
ngfl.
HSt-
iigfl-
ti&L
v-gft.
KgO.
Jlgt
W)A,
iig/L
H9^.
Hat
NO 19
NO 19
NO 19
ND 57
ND 19
ND 19
ND 19
ND 57
NO 19
ND 39
NO S3
NO 19
ND 19
ND 19
ND 19
ND 19
ND 19
NO 19
ND 19
ND 114
ND 19
NO 19
NO 19
NO 19
ND 19
ND 95
ND 39
NO 19
ND 58
ND 19
ND 210
ND 268
ngrt»
K9t
H94,
H9«.
(jg/L
(AS^=
H#L,
R9t
ngrt.
(igA.
H^L
jig/L
HS/L
ng«.
jigft.
lig^.
H9^
(ig/L
jig/L
H^L
ng/u
3 NO 10
3 ND 10
3 NO 10
3 NO 10
3 NO 10
3 NO 10
3 NO 10
3 340
3 NO 10
3 ND 10
3 NO 10
3 ND 10
3 NO 10
3 NO 10
3 NO 10
3 NO 10
3 NO 10
3 ND 10
3 NO 10
3 NO 10
3 ND 10
NO 2
NO 2
NO 2
NO 2
ND 2
ND 2
ND 2
AtJR 210
NO 2
ND 2
NO 2
NO 2
NO 2
NO 2
ND 2
ND 2
NO 2
NO 2
ND 2
NO 2
NO 2
A2-76
-------
TABLE A2-19. SS22 - SCRUBBER LIQUOR SUMMARY
(continued)
Substance
Units
Condition 2 - soil
:lag Run 1 {Flag Run 2
Volatile organic compounds - EOH
Vinyl chloride
Methyl ehkxide
Trant-1,2-cBchloroethen«
Cls-1,2-o1chloroemene
Chloroform
1,1.1- Trichloroetnafw
Carbon tatrachlorido
8«nzon«
1.2-Dichloroemane
Trichloroethena
Toluene
1.1,2-Trichlofoemarw
Tetrachloroethena
1 ,2 - Dibromoethana
Chtorobenzene
Ethylbenzena
M-/P-Xytone
O-Xytone
1 .3 • Oichlorobenzene
1 ,4 - Dichlorobenzene
1 ,2 - Dichlorobenzene
Dloxins and furan« • BOR
2378-TCDD
12378-PeCOD
123478-HxCDD -
123678-HxCDD
123789-HxCDD
1234678-HpCDD
OCDD
2378-TCOF
12378-PeCOF
23478-PeCDF
123478-HxCOF
123678-HxCOF
123789-HxCDF
234678-HxCDF
1234678-HpCOF
1234789-HpCDF
OCDF
Total TCOO
Total PeCOO
Total HxCOO
Total HpCOO
Total TCDF
Total PeCOF
Total HxCDF
Total HpCOF
Total PCDD (by isomer)
Total PCOF (by Isomer)
Total PCDO/PCOF (by isomar)
W».
jig/L
HgA.
jig/L
ngt
ngt.
ngfl-
ng/i.
tigt.
H9/L
ngn-
»&-
^9^
>ig/L
^gfl.
H^L
(ig/L
V®H-
v&i-
WJrt-
ng/i.
no/L
no/L
ng/L
ng/L
ng/U
ng/L
ng/L
ng/L
ngrt.
ng/L
ng/L
ngfl.
ngrt.
ng/L
no/L
ng/L
ngrt.
ng/L
ng/L
ng/L
ng/L
ng/L
ng/L
ng/L
ng/L
ng/L
ng/L
ng/L
NO 10
NO 10
NO 10
NO 10
NO 10
NO 10
NO 10
220
NO 10
NO 10
NO 10
NO 10
NO 10
NO 10
NO 10
NO 10
NO 10
NO 10
NO 10
NO 10
NO 10
NO 0.01
0.02
0.01
0.02
0.02
0.08
0.17
0.05
0.05
0.10
0.08
0.08
0.08
0.03
0.15
NO 021
0.05
0.09
0.12
021
0.12
120
1.00
0.74
0.20
< 0.30
< 0.88
< 1.18
NO 500
NO 500
NO 500
NO 500
NO 500
NO 500
NO 500
25000
NO 500
NO 500
NO 500
NO 500
NO 500
NO 500
NO 500
NO 500
NO 500
NO 500
NO 500
' NO 500
NO 500
NO 0.04
NO 0.09
NO 0.02
NO 0.07
NO 0.01
0.03
0.19
NO 0.38
NO 0.05
NO 0.09
NO 0.02
0.02
NO 0.02
NO 0.01
0.03
NO 0.03
0.05
0.02
NO 1.30
NO 0.33
0.08
0.63
0.07
0.10
0.03
< 0.45
< 0.69
< 1.14
A2-77
-------
TABLE A2-19. SS22 - SCRUBBER LIQUOR SUMMARY
(continued)
Substance
Unite F
Condition 2 • soil
:!ag Run 1 | Flag Run 2
Moxlns and Turin* - EOR
2378-TCOO
12378-PeCDD ,
123478-HxCDD
123678-HxCDD
123789-HxCDD ;
1234678-HpCOD
OCDO
2378-TCOF
12378-PeCOF
23478-PeCDF
123478-HxCDF
123678-HxCDF
123789-HxCOF :
234678-HxCDF
1234678-HpCDF
1234789-HpCDF
OCDF
total TCOD
Total PaCDD
Total HxCOO
Total HpCOO
Total TCDF '
Total PaCDF
Total HxCDF
Total HpCDF ;
Total doxini (by i«oni«r) including NDs
Total furans (by itomar) inducing NDo
Total doxin«/furan* (by Isonwr) ine ND«
Total doxins (by itomar) axdudng NDs
Total furan* (by toomar) axdudng ND*
Total doxins/furan* (by itomar) axdudng NOs
no/L
ng/L
ngA
ng/L
.ng/L
ng/L
ng/L
ng/L
ng/L
ng/L
ng/L
ng/L
ng/L
ng/L
ng/L
ng/L
ng/L
ng/L
ng/L
ng/L
ng/L
ng/L
ng/L
ng/L
noyL
ng/L
ng/L
ng/L
ng/L
ng/L
ng/L
NO 0.04
ND 0.03
ND 0.01
ND 0.02
ND 0.01
NO 0.03
0.25
0.02
ND 0.05
ND 0.03
ND 0.01
0.01
NO 0.01
NO 0.01
0.03
ND 0.01
0.03
ND 0.97
ND 0.46
ND 0.14
ND 0.05
0.44
0.07
0.06
0.03
< 0.40
< 0.26
< 0.65
> 0.25
> 0.12
> 0.37
Trac* matal* - BOR
Antimony
Araanic
Barium
Barylllum
Cadmium
Chromium (total)
Coppar
Load
MangancM
Mercury
NIckal
Phoaphofu* :
Satankim
SBvar :
Thallium
Tin i
Zinc \
ng/L
ug/L
us*.
Ug/L
}ig/L
>i§fl.
HSrt.
jig^.
[igfl.
ugfl-
ug4,
ug/L
jigrt.
ugrt.
ug/L
Ji9"-
ug/L
NO 100
NO 100
15
ND 10
NO 10
37
340
130
190
1.4
92
NO 100
NO 100
NO 10
ND 100
250
130C
ND 100
NO 100
ND 10
NO 10
NO 10
18
370
160
S9
0.28
180
ND 100
ND 100
NO 10
NO 100
1100
690
A2-78
-------
TABLE A2-19. SS22
•SCRUBBER LIQUOR SUMMARY
(continued)
Substance
Tn
Mil
Mk
Ph
Ph
UK
Utt
Units
Condition 2 - soil
Flag Run 1 |Flag Run 2
tee metals • EOR
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Beryllium
Cadmium
Chromium (tola!)
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Phosphorus
Selenium
Silver
Thallium
Tin
Zinc
ug/L
H9rt-
ug/L
H9/L
H9"-
Jig/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
NO 100
ND 100
19
ND 10
ND 10
76
360
210
300
0.28
110
ND 100
ND 100
ND 10
ND 100
320
2100
ND 100
ND 100
19
ND 10
ND 10
17
590
200
78
0.65
160
110
ND 100
NO 10
ND 100
4200
670
icellaneou* • BOR
Total organic carbon
Chlorine
Fluorine
Phosphate
Organic halogens (as chloride)
Inorganic halogens (as chloride)
Hexavalent chromium
iceilaneou* - EOR
Total organic carbon
Chlorine
Fluorine
Phosphate
Organic halogens (as chloride)
Inorganic halogens (as chloride)
Hexavalent chromium
yslcal characteristic* • BOR
Density
PH
pprnw
wt%
wt%
wt%
ppbw
ppmw
ppmw
ppmw
vrt.%
wt%
wt%
ppbw
ppmw
ppmw
g/cc
17.9
3 470
190
NO 0.01
57.7
3 92.8
680
NO 0.01
200
44.7
3 184
970
ND 0.01
0.98
9.8
ysieal characteristic* • EOR
Density
PH
Imato analyst* - BOR
Carbon
Hydrogen
Nitrogen
Total sulfur (as S)
Oxygen
g/ec
wt%
wt%
wt%
wt%
wt%
0.99
9.8
0.002
1.00
10
0.98
9.9
0.003
Imato analysis - EOR
Carbon
Hydrogen
Nitrogen
Total sutfur (as S)
Oxygen
wt%
wt%
wt%
wt%
wt%
0.002
0.003
A2-79
-------
TABLE A2-19. SS22 - SCRUBBER LIQUOR SUMMARY
(continued)
Substance
Units
Condition 3 - waste oil
Flag Run 1 Flag Run 2 (Flag Run 3
Total stream now rat*
Po
kg/hr IN 38.10) OUT 12.40) 0.00
lycrilorlnatad blphenyla (PCS) -BOR
Monochtorobiphenyl (total)
Didikxobiphonyl (total)
Trichtorobiphenyl (total)
Tetrachlorobiphenyl (total)
Pentaehtorobiphenyl (total)
H«xachlorobiphenyl (total)
Heptachlorobiphenyl (total)
Octechtorobiprwnyl (total)
Nonachlorobiphenyl (total)
Decachlorobiphenyl (total)
Total PCBs (Tri-Deca) including ND«
Total PCBs (Mono-Deca) inducing NDs
Total PCBs (Trf-Daca) excluding NOs
Total PCBs (Mono-Doca) excluding NDs
H9/1.
tig/L
H9A.
HS/L
(ig/L
(iff/L
ugA.
ng/L
USA.
uoyu
ligrt.
lig/L
ng/L
ng/L
Polycnlorlnated blphenyla (PCS) - EOR \igfl.
Po
Monochtorooiphenyl (total)
Dlchtorobiphenyl (total)
Trichtorobiphenyl (total)
T0trachlorobiphenyi (total)
Pentachkxobiphenyl (total)
Hexaehlorobiphenyl (total)
Heptachlofobiprtenyl (total)
Octachtorobiphenyl (total)
Nonachlorobiphenyl (total)
Deeachlorobiphenyt (total)
Total PCBs (Tri-Deca) including NDs
Total PCBs (Mono-Doca) Inducing NOs
Total PCBs (Tri-Doca) excluding NOs
Total PCBs (Mono-Doca) excluding NDs
ycycllc aromatic hydrocarbon* (PAH) - BOH
Aoenaphthen*
Ftuoron*
Phenanthrerw
AnOiracen*
Ruoranthon*
Pyrone
B»nz (a) anthracene
Chryserw
B«nzo (b) fluoranthen*
Benzo (k) fluoranttwne
Benzo (•) pyrene
Benzo (a) pyrcrw
Peryleo*
Indeno (1,2,3-cd) pyren*
Dibonz (a,h) anthracene
Benzo (g,h,l) pecylerw
Naphthatorw
2-Mathylnaprithalww
2-ChioronaprithaIen*
AcenaphtNeo*
Total PAHs
lio/L
|ig4,
|i9A.
!ig/L
ngrt.
lig/L
jio/L
H9/L
MJrt-
ttg/L 1
tio/L
tig/L
tio/L
Uflrt-
H9/L
WL
fiO/L
ftgrt.
HPXL
HS/L
H?A.
tigfl=
WJ/L
ngfL
jigrt.
jigrt.
(ig/L
lig/L
tio/U
ngfl.
»ig/L
»ioA
ng/U
ngrt.
ugA-
29 NO 0.30
29 SQL 0.05
29 SQL 0.2
29 SQL 0.26
29 SQL 0.02
29 NO 8.4
29 NO 7.2
29 NO 3.6
29 NO 0.9
29 NO O.S
29 < 21.1
29 < 21.4
29 > 0.30
29 > 0.35
29 BQL 0.08
29 BQL 0.32
29 BQL 1.2
29 BQL 2.5
29 BQL 1.1
29 NO 42
29 NO 36
29 NO 18
29 NO 4.5
29 NO 2.5
29 < 108
29 < 106
29 > 4.80
29 > 5.18
29 0.44
29 BQL 0.45
29 BQL 0.54
29 BQL 0.53
29 BQL 0.05
29 NO 8.4
29 NO 7.2
29 NO 3.6
29 NO 0.9
29 NO 0.5
29 < 21.7
29 < 22.6
29 > . 1.13
29 > 2.02
NO 25
BQL 85
1300
BQL 160
830
1000
BQL 69
BQL 120
BQL 110
BQL 41
BQL 120
BQL 180
BQL M
BQL , 92
NO 25
BQL 190
870
NO 25
NO 25
910
< 6240
29 BQL 0.18
29 BQL 0.31
29 BQL 0.25
29 BQL 0.35
29 NO 51
29 NO 47
29 NO 40
29 NO 20
29 NO 5
29 NO 2.8
29 < 166.4
29 < 166.9
29 > 0.60
29 > 1.09
29 BQL 0.29
29 BQL 0.44
29 BQL 1.2
29 BQL 2.2
29 BQL 0.67
29 BQL 0.06
29 NO 7.2
29 NO 3.6
29 NO 0.9
29 NO O.S
29 < 16.3
29 < 17.1
29 > 4.13
29 » 4.86
29 0.76
29 BQL 0.89
29 BQL 0.47
29 BQL 1.2
29 BQL 0.48
29 BQL 0.02
29 NO 7.2
29 NO 3.6
29 NO 0.9
29 NO 0.5
29 < 14.4
29 < 16.0
29 > 2,17
29 > 3.81!
NO 20
BQL 86
1300
BQL 140
800
990
BQL 64
BQL 130
BQL 140
BQL 46
BQL 130
210
BQL 75
BQL 110
NO 20
BQL 190
2«00
NO 20
NO 20
1500
< 8590
BQL 130
460
7300
760
&SOO
6100
490
860
1100
300
980
. 1400
520
630
NO 19
940
12000
BQL 94
NO 19
6500
< 46140
A2-80
-------
TABLE A2-19. SS22 - SCRUBBER LIQUOR SUMMARY
(continued)
Substance
P«
ch
riycydie aromatic hydrocarbons (PAH) - EOR
Acanaphthana
Fluorana
Phananftrana
Anthracana
Fluoranthana
Pyrana
Banz (a) anthracaha
Chrysana
Banzo (b) flyoranthana
Banzo (k) flucranthana
Banzo (a) pyrana
Banzo (a) pyranc
Pan/tana
Ihdeno (1,2,3g"-
ngfl-
Hgfl-
ngfl.
HgA.
ng".
ng/u
jigrt-
U9/1-
orobanzanaa and ehhsrophanol* -BOR
1 .2-Dichlorobanzana
1 ,3-Oichlorobanzana
1.4-Oichlorobanzana
Total dfchkjfobanzana*
1 ,2.3-Trichlorobanzana
1 ,3,5-Tricrilorobanzana
1 ,2,4-Trichlorobanzana
Total trichlorobanzanas
1 ,2,3,4-Tetrachlorobanzana
1 ,2.3.5- and/or 1 ,2,4,5-Tatrachlorobanzana
Total tatrachlorobanzanas
Pantachkxobanzana
Haxachlorobanzana
2.3-Oichlorophanol
2.4-Dichlorophanol
2.5-Dichlorophanol
2,6-Dichlorophanol
3,4-Olchlorophanol
3.5-Oichlorephanol
Total cJchtorophanols
2.3.4-Trichlorophanoi
2,3,5-Triehlorophanol
2.3,6-Trtehlorophanol
2.4.5-Trichlorophanol
2,4.6-TricNorophanol
Total trichtorophanolt
2.3.4,5.- and/or 2,3,4,8-Tatrachlorophanol
2.3.5>TatrachloroprMnol
Total tatrachtorophanol*
Pantachtorophanol
Total CB
Total CP
ng/L
ttgA-
ng/i.
(tg/i.
ng/i-
jtg'i-
ngfl.
USA.
ugA.
ng"-
U9/L
\*gfi-
ug/i.
RSt
ugA.
ngfl-
ngfl-
R9"-
itgrt-
HtJ/L
ligrt-
ttgA.
itgrt-
ug/L
U9/<-
n«/u
ugA.
iAg/i.
ugA.
jig/i.
ftg"-
ixg/L
Condition 3 • waste oil
-lag Run 1 Flag Run 2 Flag Run 3
SQL 130
490
7900
1000
5600
6600
470
960
1100
350
980
BQL 1500
490
500
NO 20
750
14000
-BQL 120
NO 20
6000
< 49000
> 49000
BQL 120
390
5600
600
4000
4900
330
690
810
240
750
1200
380
460
NO 20
680
26000
BQL 150
NO 20
6800
< 54100
> 54000
BQL 540
BQL 1400
19000
BQL 1900
18000
26000
SQL 800
BQL 1700
BQL 2100
BQL 640
BQL 3200
4500
BQL 1400
BQL 3600
NO 380
10000
QS 30000
NO 380
NO 380
20000
< 146000
> 145000
NO 25
NO 25
NO 25
NO 75
NO 25
NO 25
NO 25
NO 75
NO 25
NO 50
NO 75
NO 25
NO 25
NO 25
NO 25
NO 25
NO 25
NO 25
NO 150
NO 200
NO 25
* NO 25
NO 25
NO 25
NO 25
NO 125
NO 50
NO - 25
NO 75
NO 25
NO 275
NO 425
NO 20
NO 20
NO 20
NO 60
NO 20
NO 20
NO 20
NO 60
NO 20
NO 40
NO 60
NO 20
NO 20
NO 20
NO 20
NO 20
NO 20
NO 20
NO 120
NO 160
NO 20
NO 20
NO 20
NO 20
NO 20
NO 100
NO 40
NO 20
NO 60
NO 20
NO 220
NO 340
NO 19
NO 19
NO 19
NO 57
NO 19
NO 19
NO 19
NO 57
NO 19
NO 38
NO 57
NO 19
NO 19
NO 19
NO 13
NO 13
NO 13
NO 19
NO 114
NO 152!
NO 1$)
NO 19
NO 19
NO 19
NO 19
NO 95
NO 38
NO 19
NO 57
NO 1!!
NO 20!)
NO 323
A2-81
-------
TABLE A2-19. SS22 - SCRUBBER LIQUOR SUMMARY
(continued)
Substance
Ch
Vo
Units
Condition 3 • wasto oil
Flag Run 1 Flag Run 2 fag Run 3
lof obenzene* and chtorophtnols -EOR
1 ,2-Oich)orob«nzene
1 ,3-DIchIorobenzene
1 ,4-Dich!orobenzene
Total dchlorobenzene*
1 ,2,3-Tnchlorob«nz8ne
1.3.5-Trichlorobenzene
1 ,2,4-Trichlofobenzene
Total trichlorobenzene*
1 ,2,3,4-T«trachlorobeozon«
1,2,3.5- and/or 1,2.4.5-Tetrachlorobenzen«
Total tetrachtorobenzenes
Pontachlorobenzene
Hexachlorobenzene
2.3-Oichlorophonol
2.4-D!chIoroph«nol
2,S-D;chl
-------
TABLE A2-19. SS22 • SCRUBBER LIQUOR SUMMARY
(continued)
Substance
Units
Condition 3 - waste oil
Flag Run 1 Flag Run 2 Flag Run 3
Volatile organic compounds •> EOfl
Vinyl chtoride
Methyl chloride
Trans-1 ,2-olchloroettMne
Cis- 1 .2-dchkx oethene
Chloroform
1,1,1 -Triehtoroethane
Carbon totrachloride
Benzene
1 ,2 - Dichloroettiane
Tricnloroethene
Toluene
1,1.2-Trichloroethane
Tatrachloroeftene
1,2-Dibromoethane
Chlorobenzene
Ethylbenzene
M-/P-Xylene
O-Xylene
1 .3 - Oichlorobenzene .
1 ,4 - Dichlorobenzene
1 ,2 • Oichlorobenzene
Dloxlns and furans • BOR
2378-TCOD
12378-PeCOO
123478-HxCDD
123878-HxCDO
123789-HxCOD
1234678-HpCOO
OCDD
2378-TCOF
12378-PeCOF
23478-PeCOF
123478-HxCDF
123678-HxCDF
123789-HxCOF
234678-HxCDF
1234878-HpCDF
1234789-HpCDF
OCDF
Total TCOO
Total PeCOO
Total HxCDO
Total HpCOO
Total TCOF
Total PeCDF
Total HxCOF
Total HpCDF
Total PCOO (by i*omer)
Total PCOF (by toomer)
Total PCDD/PCDF (by l»omer)
^grt-
ngfl-
ng/L
HS^-
HS/L
jigfl-
ngfl-
ngfl.
Hgfl-
ngfl-
^g"=
ngfl-
ftg'L
Hg/L
>ig/L
u.g/L
ngfl.
MIA.
p
ND >
NO >
ND >
NO 0.02
NO 0.01
NO 0.01
NO 0.01
NO 0.01
NO 0.03
NO 0.12
0.10
0.03
0.03
0.17
0.02
NO 0.02
NO 0.01
0.06
o.ot
0.07
NO 0.40
0.01
0.02
NO 0.08
2.10
0.28
0.11
0.12
< 0.20
< 0.52
< 0.72
NO 0.20
ND 0.15
ND 0.05
NO 0.01
ND 0.01
ND 0.14
0.2(3
0.24
ND 0.14
ND 0.2(3
0.07
0.03
0.07
0.04
0.13
0.03
0.17
o.as
1.SO
2.50
. 0.17
8.70
2.00
0.82
0.23
< 0.81
1.23
< 2.04
A2-83
-------
TABLE A2-19. SS22 • SCRUBBER LIQUOR SUMMARY
(continued)
Substance
1 1 Condition 3 - waste oil
Units1 plag Bun 1 Flag Run 2 Flag Run 3
CHorinc and furana - EOR
Tn
2378-TCDD
12378-PeCOD
123478-HxCDD
123S73-HXCDO
123789-HxCDD
1234678-HpCDO
OCOD
2378-TCDF
12378-PeCDF
23478-PeCOF
123478-HxCDF
123678-HxCDF
123789-HxCDF
234678-HxCDF
1234878-HpCOF
1234789-HpCOF
OCDF
Total TCDD
Total PeCOD
Total HxCDD
Total HpCDO
Total TCDF
Total PeCDF
Total HxCDF
Total HpCDF
Total dioxlns (by isomer) including NOs
Total furans (by isomer) including ND<
Total dtoxins/turans (by Isomer) ine NOs
Total doxins (by Isomor) «xdudlng NDs
Total furans (by isomer) exdudng NO*
Total doxins/Turans (by Isomer] excluding NOs
ng/L
ng/L'
ng/L
ng/L
ng/L
ng/L
ng/L
ng/L:
ng/L
ng/L
ng/L,
ng/L
ng/L
ng/L
ng/L
ng/L
ng/L
ngA=
ng/L
n§/L
ng/L
ng/L
ng/L
ng/L
ng/L
ng/L;
ng/L
ng/L
ng/L
ng/L
ng/L
NO 0.11
NO 0.06
NO 0.02
NO 0.02
NO 0.01
NO 0.17
0.28
0.11
NO 0.09
NO 0.09
NO 0.04
NO 0.04
NO 0.09
NO 0.06
NO 0.35
NO 0.23
0.39
NO 2.42
NO 0.88
NO 0.14
NO 0.34
2.00
NO 2.44
NO 0.91
NO 1.16
< 0.67
< 1.48
< 2.15
> 0.28
> ' 0.50
> 0.78
NO 0.03
NO 0.03
NO 0.01
NO 0.01
NO 0.01
NO 0.01
F 0.12
0.03
NO 0.02
NO 0.02
NO 0.01
NO 0.01
NO 0.01
NO 0.02
NO 0.03
NO 0.01
NO 0.03
NO 0.57
ND 0.38
NO 0.09
NO 0.03
o.os
NO 0.53
0.02
NO 0.07
< 0.21
< 0.19
< 0.40
> 0.12
> 0.03
> 0.1E
NO 0.40
ND 0.17
NO 0.15
ND 0.10
NO 0.26
ND 0.35
0.30
NO 0.28
NO 0.37
NO 0.39
NO 0.03
NO 0.03
ND 0.03
NO 0.03
0.13
NO 0.12
ND 0.28
0.29
0.35
0.76
NO 0.70
5.50
0.55
0.16
0.13
< 1.73
< 1.89
< 3.62
» 0.30
> 0.13
> 0.43
ie« metala - BOR
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Beryllium
Cadmium
Chromium (total)
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Phosphorus
Selenium
Silver
Thai Hum
Tin
Zinc
ngfl-
»&-
jig/L
ItgfL
V&L
1^
HS/L
\tgfl.
HS/L
P9fl-
H9ft-
H9/L
^9^
(igt
tig/L
»tg/L
H5/L
NO 100
NO 100
24
NO 10
NO 10
39
120
120
99
NO 0.2
11
NO 100
NO 100
NO 10
NO 100
NO 100
820
NO 100
NO 100
3S
NO 10
NO 10
50
150
170
370
0.37
17
sa
NO 100
NO 10
NO 100
NO 10®
100C
NO 100
130
42
NO 10
ND 10
300
370
1200
730
8(1
430
NO 100
NO 10
NO 100
210
720*0
A2-84
-------
TABLE A2-19. SS22 - SCRUBBER LIQUOR SUMMARY
(continued)
Substance
Tn
Mi
Ml)
Ph
Ph
Ult
Utt
ice metals - EOR
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium .
Beryllium
Cadmium
Chromium (total)
Copper
Load
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel '
Phosphorus
Selenium
Silver
Thallium
Tin
Zinc
Units
Condition 3 - waste oil
Flag Run 1 Flag Hun 2 Flag Run 3
tifStfttilittitil
NO 100
140
57
NO 10
NO 10
250
380
830
940
1.1
250
200
NO 100
ND 10
160
ND 100
4200
ND 100
350
72
ND 10
ND 10
660
620
2300
1800
2.3
340
650
ND 100
ND 10
140
450
15000
NO 101}
201}
49
ND 10
ND 10
820
710
2000
1100
2.3
420
810
ND 100
ND 10
110
390
14000
icellaneous - BOR
Total organic carfaon
Chlorine
Fluorine
Phosphate
Organic halogens (as chloride)
Inorganic halogens (as chloride}
Hexavalent chromium
icellaneous - EOR
Total organic carbon
Chlorine
Fluorine
Phosphate
Organic halogens (as chloride)
Inorganic halogens (as chloride)
Hexavalent chromium
ppmw
wt%
wt%
wt%
ppbw
ppmw
ppmw
ppmw
wt%
wt%
wt%
ppbw
ppmw
ppmw
63.3
e
3 56.6
1700
ND 0.01
19
3 216
1700
ND 0.01
15.9
3 43300
100
ND 0.01
41.6
3 78900
5100
ND 0.01
15.7
11 119000
280
ND 0.01
30.3
11 1410
4100
ND O.CI1
ysicej characteristics - BOR
Density
pH
ysleel characteriiitics - EOR
Density
pH
g/ec
•»
0.98
9
0.98
9.6
0.99
11.4
g/cc
0.97
8.4
0.99
7.1
0.99
8.2
Jmate analysis - BOR
Carbon
Hydrogen
Nitrogen
total sulfur (as S)
Oxygen
wt%
wt%
wt%
wt%
wt%
0.002
0.001
0.002
Jmate analysis - EOR
Carbon
Hydrogun
Nitrogen
Total surfur (as S)
Oxygen
wt%
wt%
wt%
wt%
wt%
0.002
0.003
0.033
IN -mass flow into system (total mast at end of run less
that at beginning).
OUT - mass flow out of system (tola) mass at end of run
greater than at beginning).
A2-85
-------
TABLE A2-20. SS24 - TDU QUENCH WATER SUMMARY
Substance
Units
Total stream flow rat*
Po
Ch
Kg/hr
ychtorlnated biphenyta (PCS)
Monochtorobiphenyl (total)
Dlchfofobiphenyl (total)
Trichtorobiphenyl (total)
Tetrachlorobiphenyl (total)
Pentachlorobiphenyl (total)
Hexachlofobiphenyl (total)
Hoptachlofobiphenyl (total)
Octachtorobiphenyl (total)
Nonachlofobiphenyl (total)
Decachlorobiphenyt (total)
Total PCB« (Tri-Oeca) including ND»
Total PCBs (Mono-Deca) inducing ND»
Total PCBs (Tri-D«ca) excluding ND<
Total PCBs (Mono-Deca) excluding NO*
orobenzenee and chtorophenols
1 ,2-Dichlorobenzene
1 ,3-Dichlorobenzene
1 .4-Dichlof obenzene
Total olchlorobenzenes
1 ,2,3-Trichlorobenzene
1 ,3,5-Trichlorobenzene
1 ,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
Total trichlorobenzones
1 ,2,3,4-Tetrachlorobenzene
1.3,3,5- and/or 1.2,4.5-Tetrachlorobenzefw
Total tetrachlorobenzenes
Pentachkxobenzene
Hexachlorobenzene
2,3-Oichloropheno4
2,4-Dichloropnenol
2.5-Dlchlorophenoi
2,6-Dlchlorophenol
3.4-Oichloroph«nol
3.5-Dlchloropbenol
Total dfchtorophenols
2.3.4-Trichlorophenol
2.3.5-Trichlorophenol
2.3.6-Trichlorophenol
2.4,5-Trichlorophenol
2.4,6-Trichlofoph«nol
Total trichkxophenols
2,3.4,5.- and/or 2.3.4.6-Tetrachloropnenol
2.3.5.8-Tetrachlorophenol
Total totrachkxophenots
Pentachlorophenol
Total CB
Total CP
ngfl.
^gt-
^g/L
^g/L
jigt
j»gfl-
ugrt.
ugrt.
Hg«.
\i&-
ng/u
ngn.
ng/L
ug/L
^9"-
nsfl-
fiS'L
USA.
jig/L
HSt,
ngfl-
ng/u
ng".
tig"-
ug/L
jigfl-
ug/L
jigt
"grt»
jtgfl-
jigt
ugrt.
USA.
ngt
ns'i.
H9"=
jigt
jigfl.
ug/i-
iig/L
ngfl-
^grt.
ug/L
ngt
ngrt.
ug/L
Condition 2 - soil
Flag Run 1-BOR|Flag Run2-BOR
-
4.40
150
890
1500
620
46
8.5
BQL 2.1
BQL 0.23
BQL 0.28
< 3067
< 3222
all detected
all detected
0.30
720
35.00
53.00
22
BQL 2.3
BQL 0.44
BQL 0.09
NO 0.88
BQL 0.17
< 114
< 121
> 113
> 120
NO 20
NO 20
NO 20
NO 80
NO 20
NO 20
NO tO
NO 60
NO 20
NO 40
NO 60
NO 20
NO 20
NO 20
NO 20
NO 20
NO 20
NO 20
NO 20
NO 120
NO 20
NO 20
NO 20
NO 20
NO 20
NO 100
NO 40
NO 20
NO 80
NO 20
NO 220
NO 300
NO 0.98
NO 0.98
NO 0.98
NO 2.94
NO 0.98
NO 0.98
NO 0.98
NO 2.94
NO 0.98
NO 2
NO 2.98
BQL 5.1
ALR 530
NO 0.98
NO 0.98
NO 0.98
NO 0.98
NO 0.98
NO 0.98
NO 5.88
NO 19
NO 19
NO 19
NO 19
NO 19
NO 95
NO 39
NO 19
NO 58
NO 19
NO 210
NO 286
A2-86
-------
TABLE A2-20. SS24 - TDU QUENCH WATER SUMMARY
(continued)
Substance
Units
Polycycllc aromatic hydrocarbon* (PAH)
Acanaphthena
Fluorena
Phenanthrana
Antnracene
Fluoranthene
Pyrane
Benz (a) anthracene
Chrysene
Benzo (b) fluoranthene
Bonzo (k) fluoranthene
Benzo (e).pyrene
Benzo (a) pyrana
Perytana
Indeno (1 ,2,3-cd) pyrane
Oibenz (a,h) anthracene
Benzo (g.h.i) parylana
Naphthalene
2-Methy!naphthal»na
2-ChloronaphthaJana
Acanaphthiana
Total PAH»
H9"-
Jig'l.
USA-
ngfl-
ng/L
«)/!-
ngfl-
vgn-
jig/L
H9/L
ng/L
H9/L
H9/L
ng/L
ngrt.
ngfl-
ugt
jig/i-
V&.
^ig/L
H9/L
Oloxlna and furana
2378-TCDD
12378-PeCDD
123478-HxCDO
123678-HxCOO
123789-HxCDO
1234878-HpCDO
OCOD
2378-TCDF
12378-PaCDF
23478-PaCDF
123478-HxCDF
123678-HxCDF
123789-HxCDF
234678-HxCOF
1234678-HpCDF
1234789-HpCDF
OCDF
Total TCDD
Total PaCOO
Total HxCOO
Total HpCDO
Total TCOF
Total PeCOF
Total HxCDF
Total HpCDF
Total doxins (by isomer) Including NDs
Total furans (by isomer) including NOt
Total doxins/furans (by isomar) inc ND>
Total doxlna (by isomar) exdudng NOs
Total furans (by isomar) axdudng NDs
Total doxins/Turans (by isomar) axdudng NOs
ng/L
ng/L
ng/L
ng/L
ng/L
ng/L
ng/L
ng/L
ng/L
ng/L
ng/L
ng/L
ng/L
ng/L
ng/L
ng/L
ng/L
ng/L
ng/L
ng/L
ng/L
ng/L
ng/L
ng/L
ng/L
ng/L
ng/L
ng/L
ng/L
ng/L
ng/L
Condition 2 - soil
:lag Run 1-BORI Flag Run2-BOR
35 SQL 130
35 460
35 7400
35 880
35 5500
35 7000
35 500
35 870
35 1 100
35 390
35 1000
35 1600
35 530
35 860
35 SQL 62
35 BQL 2000
35 14000
35 BQL 97
35 NO 20
35 6800
35 < 51100
35 NO 20
35 NO 20
35 NO 20
35 NO 20
35 NO 20
35 NO 20
35 NO 20
35 NO 20
35 NO 20
35 NO 20
35 NO 20
35 NO 20
35 NO 20
35 NO 20
35 NO 20
35 NO 20
35 BQL 34
35 NO 20
35 NO 20
35 NO 20
35 < 414
NO 0.06
NO 0.72
0.49
0.78
1.10
12.00
46 110.00
0.10
0.64
2.40
NO 2.00
0.96
0.19
0.56
5.50
2.20
45.00
0.84
1.90
11.00
24.00
23.00
19.00
11.00
9.60
< 125.15
< 59.55
< 184.70
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
NO 0.04
0.11
0.12
0.19
0.22
3.20
28.00
NO 0.06
NO 0.07
NO 0.07
0.14
NO 0.59
NO 0.03
NO 0.05
1.30
0.44
10.00
NO 0.95
0.11
2.40
6.50
0.53
0.31
1.00
2.60
< 31.88
< 12.75
< 44.63
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
A2-87
-------
TABLE A2-20. SS24 - TDU QUENCH WATER SUMMARY
(continued)
Substance
Units
Volatile organic compounds
Vinyl chloride
Methyl chloride
Trans- 1 ,2-oSchloroethene •
Cls-1.2-dehloroemene !
Chloroform !
1,1.1- Triehloroethane ;
Carbon tetrachloride ;
Benzene
1,2-Dichloroethane
Trichloroethene
Toluene ;
1.1.2-Trichloroemane
Tetrachloroethene
1,2-Dibromoethane
Chlorobenzene
Ethylbenzene
M-/P-Xytone
O-Xylene
1 .3 - Dlchlorobenzene ;
1 .4 - Dlchlorobenzene
1 .2 - Dichlorobenzane
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ng/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ngrt.
ug/L
Trace metals
Antimony '
Arsenic
Barium
Beryllium
Cadmium
Chromium (total)
Copper
Lead ;
Manganese '•
Mercury ,
Nickel
Phosphorus
Selenium
Silver
Thallium
Tin !
Zinc
ug/L
ug/L
jig/L
ug/L
ugrt.
ug/L
ugrt.
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug4,
ugrt.
ug/L
J1^
Miscellaneous
Total organic carbon ,
Total sulfur (as S)
Ash
Organic halogens (as chloride)
Inorganic halogens (as chloride)
Haxavalent chromium
ppmw
wt%
wt%
ppcw
ppmw
ppmw
Condition 2 - soil
Flag Run1-BOR|FIag Run2-BOR
NO 100
590
ND 100
780
ND 100
SQL 180
ND 100
BQL 240
ND 100
4200
BQL 450
ND 100
ND 100
NO 100
NO 100
BQL 180
BQL 280
BQL 180
ND 100
ND 100
NO 100
ND 2
BQL 7
ND 2
BQL 4
15
ND 2
ND 2
ALR 260
ND 2
24
BQL 3
ND 2
ND 2
ND 2
ND 2
ND 2
BQL 6
NO 2
NO 2
NO 2
ND 2
ND 100
NO 100
250
ND 10
ND 10
61
93
270
580
1.5
76
1100
ND 100
ND 10
NO 100
1100
750
ND 100
NO 100
60
NO 10
NO 10
NO 10
16
NO ' SO
64
NO 0.2
NO 10
120
NO 100
NO 10
ND 100
130
68
22.7
0.002
0.100
3 1860
76
ND 0.01
5.6
0.0001
0.020
3 150
80
NO 0.01
A2-88
-------
TABLE A2-20. SS24
TDU QUENCH WATER SUMMARY
(continued)
Substance
Tol
Po
Ch
Units
al stream flow rat*
kg/hr
ychlortnatad blphanyls (PCS)
Moncchlorobiphenyl (total)
Dichkxobiphanyl (total)
Trichlorobiphonyt (total)
Tatrachlorobiphanyl (total)
Pontachkxobiphonyl (total)
Hoxachlorobiphanyl (total)
Haptachlorobiphenyl (total)
Octachtorobiphanyl (total)
Nonachlorobiphanyl (total)
Dacachlorobiphanyl (total)
Total PCBs (Trt-Daca) including NDs
Total PCBs (Monc-Deea) including NDs
Total PCBs (Tri-0«ca) excluding NDs
Total PCBs (Mono-Deca) excluding NDs
^g4,
|ig/L
»9H-
H9/1.
Rgrt-
.ng/L
MS/'-
ugn.
HS'L
>ig/L
ngA.
vgn-
jigfl-
ngfl-
orob«nzenea and chlorophanols
1 ,2-Dichlorobenzene
1 ,3-Dichlorooenzene
1 .4-Oichlorob»nzona
Total dchtorobenzenes
1 ,2,3-Trichlorobenzene
1 .3.5-Trichlorobenzen«
1 ,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
Total trichkxobonzenes
1 ,2.3.4-Tetrachiofooenzene
1,2.3.5- and/or 1,2.4.5-T«trachtorob«nz»n«
Total tatrachlorooanzene*
Pontachlorobanz«n«
Hexachlorob«nz«ne
2.3-C3ichloroph«nol
2.4-Dichloroph«nol
2.5-Dichloroph«nol
2,&-Dichlofoph«not
3.4-Oicrilorophono)
3.5-Oichloroph«nol
Total dtchlorophanols
2.3,4-Trichlorophanol
2,3,5-Tnchlorophanol
2.3,6-Trichloroph«nol
2,4,5-Trichloroph«nol
2,4,6-Trichloroprwnol
Total tnchtoroptwnol*
2.3,4,5.- and/or 2.3,4,S-T«trachloroph«no)
2.3,5,6-ToirachloroptMnol
Total tatrachlorophanoU
Pontachloroph«noi
Total CB
Total CP ' .
pgn.
>igfl-
AsCL
K9/1-
ugA.
ug/i.
U.OA
ug/L
ugA.
ug/L
_yg/L
(ig/L
|ig/L
ngrt.
Ml"-
H9t
jigrt.
Jigt
HS/L
not-
H9/L
ftg/U
>ig/L
HOfl.
Hflrt.
jigrt.
no/l.
uo/L
jig/U
Kfl"-
^9^-
K9A
Condition 2 - soil
Flag Run 1-EOR|Flag Run2-EOR
OUT 2.63) IN 2.69
1.90
58.00
370
600
270.00
23
SQL 4.7
BQL 1.3
SQL 0.25
1.6
< 1271
< 1331
all detected
all detactad
BQL 0.04
BQL 0.30
BQL 1.7
BQL 2.3
BQL 0.91
BQL 0.059
NO 7.2
NO 3.6
NO 0.9
NO 0.5
< 17.17
< 17.51
> 4.97
> 5.31
NO 0.98
NO 0.98
NO 0.98
NO 2.94
NO 0.98
NO 0.98
NO 0.98
NO 2.94
NO 0.98
NO 2
NO 2.98
BQL 5.1
790
NO 0.98
NO 0.98
NO 0.98
NO 0.98
NO 0.98
NO 0.98
NO 5.88
NO 25
NO 25
NO 25
NO 25
NO 25
NO 125
NO 50
NO 25
NO 75
NO 25
NO 275
NO 425
NO 0.97
NO 0.97
NO 0.97
NO 2.91
NO 0.97
NO 0.97
NO 0.97
NO 2.91
NO 0.97
NO 1.9
NO 2.87
BQL 1.2
100
NO 0.97
NO 0.97
NO 0.97
NO 0.97
NO 0.97
NO 0.97
NO 5.82
NO 20
NO 20
NO 20
NO 20
NO 20
NO 100
NO 40
NO 20
NO 60
NO 20
NO 220
NO 340
A2-89
-------
TABLE A2-20. SS24 - TDU QUENCH WATER SUMMARY
(continued)
Substance
Units
Pdycycllc aromatic hydrocarbons (PAH)
Acenaphthene
Fluorene
Phenanthrene
Anthracene
Fluoranthene !
Pyrene ;
Benz (a) anthracene
Chrysene
Benzo (b) fluoranthene
Benzo (k) fluoranthene
Benzo (e) pyrene
Bonzo (a) pyrene
Perytene
Indeno (1,2.3-od)pyronc
Dibenz (a.h) anthracene ,
Benzo (g.h.i) perylene
Naphthalene
2-Methylnaphthalene
2-Chloronaphtha)ene
Acenaphthlene • . i
Total PAH*
fig/L
^gA.
ugA.
H9«.
ng/L
jigfl.
H9".
tigt
ng^i.
no/u
jig/L
K9t
ficyu
ngt-
ngfl-
ngt
ngfl-
J*S/L
jisfl.
tigfl-
ugA.
Dtoxlns and furane
2378-TCDD
12378-PeCOO
123478-HxCDD
123«78-HxCOO
123789-HxCOO
1234878-HpCDD
OCDD
2378-TCOF
12378-PeCDF
23478-PeCDF I
123478-HxCDF
123878-HxCDF
123789-HxCOF
234678-HxCDF
1234878-HpCDF
1234789-HpCDF
OCDF
Total TCDD
Total PeCDD
Total HxCDO
Total HpCDD
Total TCDF
Total PeCDF
Total HxCOF
Total HpCOF '<
Total doxins (by isomer) Inducing NDs
Total furans (by Isomer) Inducing NO* i
Total doxlns/furans (by Isomer) inc NOs
Total doxins (by Isomer) exdudng NDs
Total furans (by Isomer) exdudng NOs
Total doxIns/Turans (by isomer) exdudng NDs
ng/L
ng/L
ng/L
ng/L
ng/L
ng/L
ng/L
ng/L
ng/L
ng/L
ng/L
ng/L
ngfl.
ng/L
ng/L
ng/L
ng/L
ng/L
ng/L
ng/L
ncyL
ng/L
ng/L
ng/L
ng/L
ng/L
ng/L
ng/L
ng/L
ng/L
ng/L
Condition 2 - soil
Flag Run 1-EORI Flag Run2-EOR
35 NO 0.98
35 NO 0.98
35 SQL 3.1
35 NO 0.98
35 NO 0.98
35 SQL 1.1
35 NO 0.98
35 NO 0.98
35 NO 0.98
35 NO 0.98
35 NO 0.98
35 NO 0.98
35 NO 0.98
35 NO 0.98
35 NO 0.98
35 NO 0.98
35 16
35 NO 0.98
35 NO 0.98
35 SQL 3
35 < 38.9
35 NO 0.97
35 NO 0.97
3§ SQL 3.4
3S NO 0.97
35 SQL 1.5
3S SQL 2.3
3S NO 0.97
3S NO 0.97
3S NO 0.97
35 NO 0.97
35 NO 0.97
355 NO 0.97
35 NO 0.97
35 NO 0.97
35 NO 0.97
35 NO 0.97
35 28
33 NO 0.97
3S NO 0.97
35 BQL 3.1
35 < 52.65
NO 020
1.10
0.720
1.400
2.000
15.00
110.00
0.27
0.32
0.80
1.00
NO 4.30
NO 024
NO 0.47
7.20
2.90
42.00
022
3.60
19.00
24.00
6.10
6.30
720
15.00
< 130.42
59.50
< 189.92
< 1.00
1.00
< 1.0Q
NO 0.023
NO 0.030
0.018
0.020
0.034
0.50
6.40
NO 0.01 1
NO 0.03
NO 0.014
NO 0.018
NO 0.43
NO 0.016
NO 0.0087
0.20
0.06
1.90
NO 0.51
NO 0.42
0.28
1.10
0.049
0.033
0.045
0.038
< 7.03
< 2.69
< 9.71
<: 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
A2-90
-------
TABLE A2-20. SS24 - TDU QUENCH WATER SUMMARY
(continued)
Substance
Vo
latlle organic compounds
Vinyl chloride
Methyl chloride .
Trans-1 ,2-dtehloroethene
Cis>1,2-dchloroethene
Chloroform
1.1,1 • Trichtoroethane
Carbon tetrachkxide
Benzene
1.2-DichIoroethane
Trichloroethene
Toluene
1 .1 ,2 - Trichtoroethane
Tetrachloroethene
1,2-Dibromoethane
Chkxobenzene
Ethylbenzene
M-/P-Xylene
O-Xylene
1 ,3 - Dichkxobenzene
1 .4 • Dtehkxobenzene
1 ,2 - Oichlorobenzene
Units
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
jigrt.
Jtg/L
Jig/L
ugrt.
HS/U
wg/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
trace metals
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Beryllium
Cadmium
Chromium (total)
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel .
Phosphorus
Selenium
Silver
Thallium
Tin
Zinc
ugrt.
ng4.
ugfl-
ugA.
ugA.
jigA.
ucyu
ug/L
ugrt.
ugn.
jigA,
Hg/L
ugfl-
ugrt.
ug/L
ugA.
ug/L
Miscellaneous
Total organic carbon
Total sulfur (as S)
Ash
Organic halogen* (*s chloride)
Inorganic halogens (as chloride)
Hexavalent chromium
ppmw
wt%
wt%
ppbw
ppmw
ppmw
Condition 2 • soil
Flag Run 1-EOR|Flag Run2-EOR
ND 100
780
NO 100
S90
SQL 100
NO 100
NO 100
NO 100
NO 100
2300
BQL 420
NO 100
NO 100
NO 100
NO 100
BQL 120
BQL 380
BQL 120
NO 100
ND 100
NO 100
NO 100
NO 100
ND 100
NO 100
NO 100
NO 100
- NO 100
880
NO 100
NO 100
100
ND 100
ND 100
NO 100
NO 100
ND 100
ND 100
NO 100
NO 100
NO 100
NO 100
NO 100
NO 100
310
NO 10
ND 10
47
86
250
480
0.2S
82
820
NO 100
NO 10
NO 100
530
580
54 NA
0.001
0.070
54 NA
320
NO 0.01
ND 100
NO 100
220
ND 10
ND 10
ND 10
NO 10
NO 50
NO 10
0.45
NO 10
NO 100
ND 100
ND 10
NO 100
410
28
4.39
0.0011
0.050
3 41.1
340
NO 0.01
A2-91
-------
KEY TO ANNOTATED TABLES
(continued)
Footnote
Number
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
'
Description
Surrogate recoveries for the acid compounds ware balow quality control limits.
This was caused by harsh conditions during the extraction procedure. CP for
these samples should be considered estimates.
Exhibited low internal standard areas resulting in high surrogate recoveries due
to matrix effect; sample was run twice to confirm matrix effect.
Samples analyzed or extracted out of holding time.
Analysis not performed due to insufficient sample volume, analytes low on
priority list Field clearance from FW and EPA.
Analysis for total halogens (as Cl)
Sample diluted with 1 liter of Dl water.
Samples were not spiked with surrogates before extraction.
Benzene saturation, very low or no internal standards detected. Results
calculated from external standard method. Possible toss of all halogenated
compounds due to matrix. All data qualitative (tube pairs affected).
Leaky autosampler caused a system failure. Data lost Results should be
considered qualitative (tube pairs affected).
Valve and line contamination from high concentrations in previous samples.
Benzene, cfchlorobenzene, bromoform initial calibration failure. Results for
these compounds are estimates (tube pairs affected).
Broken tube, no data (tube pairs affected).
High 1£-dichloroethane-d4 surrogate failure due to unknown matrix
interferences (tube pairs affected). !
High toluene-d8 surrogate failure due to unknown matrix interferences (tube
pairs affected).
High 4-bromoftourobenzene surrogate failure due to unknown matrix
Interferences (tube pairs affected).
Low 1 ,2-dicrikxoethane-d4 surrogate failure duo to unknown matrix interferences
(tube pairs affected).
Low toluene-d8 surrogate failure due to unknown matrix interferences (tube pairs
affected).
Low 4-bromoflourobenzene surrogate failure due to unknown matrix
interferences (tube pairs affected).
Tubes mixed between SS16 and SS14, sampled twice (tube pairs affected).
Filter ripped.
!
Post-test leak rate of 0.075 cfm.
Filters not weighed before digestion.
Faulty photomultipner tuba - Hg results questionable.
NOx drift beyond control limits, data corrected for drift
MIslabeled sample prep data, sample run out of hold ng time
Heating value analysis Indicated only 66% propane, which is unreasonable.
Heating value for propane from vendor was used instead.
OCDD found In method blanks.
Contains a large peak with a retention time of 24.13 minutes, reported as EMPC
for the tetra- and penta-. Naphthalene peak occurs at the same retention time,
suggesting that these EMPC are due to naphthalene interference.
The MS/MSD conducted on this matrix resulted in low recoveries for mono-
through deca- and low precision for tri- and penta-.
The MS/MSD conducted on this matrix resulted in low recoveries for mono-,
penta-, and deca-, and low precision for mono-.
Corrective Action
Flag CP aa estimates. Possible low
bias.
Flag VOC results as estimates.
Possible high bias.
Flag all results as estimates. Results
may be low.
None; delate from completeness
objective.
Adjust results sheet
Correct data before reporting.
Flag GB, CP. and PAH data. Accuracy
based on internal standard recoveries.
Flag all VOC data and omit from any
averaging. Results for halogenated
compounds may be tow.
Flag all VOC data and omit from any
averaging.
Flag benzone, dtehlorobenzene,
bromoform as estimates.
Lost VOC data.
Flag VOC data. Possible high Mas.
Flag VOC data. Possible high bias.
Flag VOC data. Possible high bias.
Flag VOC data. Possible low bias.
Flag VOC data. Possible tow bias.
Flag VOC data. Possible tow bias.
Lost VOC data.
Flag partieulate results as estimate.
Data for metals and paniculate
corrected for teak (7.1% of total sample
volume).
Lost partieulato data. Did not meet.
completeness objective for partieulate.
Flag Hg results.
Data corrected for drift
Flag data as estimates. Results may
balow.
Flag C1-C6 hydrocarbon results.
Flag OCDD results. Results may be
hjgJL-
Flag penta- and tetra- results. Possible
high bias due to interference from
naphthalene.
Flag SS12 C3 PCB results. Possible
low bias and low precision.
Flag SS22 C3 PCB results. Possible
low bias and low precision.
A2-92
-------
KEY TO ANNOTATED TABLES
(continued)
Footnote
Number
30
. 31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
Description
Did not meet organic halogen precision objective.
Did not meet sulfur precision objective.
Did not meet hydrogen precision objective.
Did not meet CO2 accuracy or precision objectives.
MS/MSD for this matrix resulted in low recoveries for acid compounds 4-
nitrophenol and pentachlorophenol. Acid surrogate recoveries were also low due
to matrix effect Flag CP as estimates for this matrix.
This matrix contained high concentrations of phenol and pyrene. MS/MSD
recoveries for these two compounds could not be calculated due to relatively low
spike level. 4-nitrophehol spike was below detection due to high dilution.
This matrix contained high concentrations of acenaphthene and pyrene.
MS/MSD recoveries for these two compounds could not be calculated due to
relatively low spike level.
Spiking levels in MS and MSD samples for the condition 1 matrix were too low
compared to high concentrations of acenaphthene and pyrene. Percent
recoveries for these two compounds could not be calculated.
4-nitrophenol spike was below detection due to high dilution.
High level of benzene saturated column resulting in poor repeatability.
Benzene in the MS/MSD and corresponding sample saturated the detector,
causing poor repeatability.
Metals Train Field Blank contamination.
Did not meet PAH SS16 accuracy objective.
Low internal standards recoveries but surrogate recoveries were acceptable;
data are considered good estimate (pairs affected).
No field blank data; data system fault.
Benzene saturation and high levels of toluene. Internal standards were
suppressed and many compounds were unidentff able. High surragote
recoveries due to the suppressed IS.
Internal standards failed to meet minimum area requirements, causing high
surrogate recoveries.
High levels of native OCDD saturated the detector signal. This should be
regarded as the minimum possible concentration.
Laboratory blank was contaminated from previous sample that eluted through
gel-permeation dean-up.
The low surrogate recoveries and corresponding anatyte levels were due to the
material absorbing to the precipitate that formed in the extract
Method blank contained detections for tri- and tetra- above 1 0% of the sample
value.
=ield duplicate yielded low precision due to high concentrations and poor
repeatability.
Field duplicate yielded low precision due to high levels of native analytes,
resulting in poor repeatability.
MSD resulted in high pyrene recoveries. This one result did not meet the
precision objective.
Deak response shift due to matrix interference, high saturation, poorly resolved
peaks, coeluting interferences.
Sample not analyzed.
Corrective Action
Flag SSI and SS18 organic halogens.
Low precision.
Flag SS1 and SS18 total sulfur. Low
precision.
Flag SS2 hydrogen. Low precision.
Flag SS9 and SS14 CO2 results.
Accuracy and precision did not meet
objectives.
Flag CP results as estimates for SS1 .
Possible low bias.
Flag SS11 PAH data. Accuracy and
precision not documented.
Flag SS12 PAH data. Accuracy and
precision not documented.
Flag SS22 PAH data. Accuracy and
precision not documented.
Flag SS1 1 C3 VOC data. Low
precision.
Flag SS12 C3 data. Low precision.
Flag results. Results may by high due
to high background levels.
Flag SS16.PAH data. Low accuracy.
Flag VOC data as good estimates.
Background levels are unknown; flag
VOC data.
Flag data as qualitative only. Probable
high bias.
Flag VOC data as estimates. Possible
high bias.
Flag OCOD as minimum amount
Flag PAH data as high due to
contamination.
Flag PCS data. Possible low bias.
Flag PCS tri and tetra data. Results
may be statistically insignificant.
Flag SS3 PCS data. Low predaton.
Flag VOC SS3 data. Low precision.
Flag SS3 PAH data. Low precision anc
possible high bias for pyrene.
Flag PCDD/PCDF data as estimates.
Flag data.
A2-93
-------
This page intentionally left blank.
A2-94
-------
APPENDIX 3
DATA EVALUATION
This appendix provides supporting information for the mass balance and organic destruction
efficiency discussion provided in Section 5 of the main report. The information provided in this
appendix can be used to:
(1) Compute DE and DREs for PCBs, PCDD/PCDF, HCB, and PCE;
(2) Determine critical streams for PCBs, PCDD/PCDF, HCB, PCE, metals, and major elements;
(3) Compare concentrations of each PCBs, PCDD/PCDF, HCB, and PCE stream on the same
basis; and
(4) Compare actual flow rates during the test runs for PCBs, PCDD/PCDF, HCB, and PCE.
For a complete discussion of the methods and assumptions used for the mass balance and
destruction efficiency computations, the reader should refer to Section 5 of the main report. The
detection limrt and composite procedures used to present data in the remainder of this section are
summarized below.
DETECTION LIMITS
(1) For the PCBs, PCDD/PCDF. HCB and PCE, detection limits for the input streams were
set to zero while the full value of the detection limit was used for the output streams.
(2) For the metals and major elements, the full value of the detection limit was used for both
input and output streams.
INTERPOLATING COMPOSITE CONCENTRATIONS TO RUN CONCENTRATIONS
(1) For the PCBs, PCDD/PCDF, HCB and PCE, output stream condition composite
concentrations were multiplied by 3 or 2 depending on the number of runs composited
to estimate the run concentrations. For the input streams, run concentrations were
, A3-1
-------
assumed to equal the condition composite concentration. The following streams and
substances were impacted by the compositing assumptions.
Reactor Grit SS11: PCDD/PCDF. PCB, HCB. PCE
Scrubber Sludge SS12: PCDD/PCDF. PCB (Condition 2 and Condition 3
Run 3 only). HCB. PCE
Scrubber Decant Water SS13: PCDD/PCDF. PCB, HCB. PCE (Condition 3
only)
Reformed Gas Condensate SS15: PCDD/PCDF. PCB (Condition 3 Run 2 and
Condition 3 Run 3 only)
(2) No interpolating procedures were necessary for the metals and major elements.
RESULTS PRESENTATION
Tables A3-1 to A3-12 show the following information for PCBs, PCDD, PCDF, HCB, and
PCE in each stream for each condition:
(1) Percent of detected data. This column is the ratio of the detected mass to the total
mass.
i
I
(2) Flow rates. This column shows the actual f|ow rate for the test condition. Since the flow
rates are based on the actual process times, they cannot be used to compute DREs and
DEs. |
! -
(3) Masses. This column shows that total mass for each substance for each run. The mass
can be used to compute DREs and DEs.
(4) Concentrations. This column shows the concentration of each substance for each run on
a weight basis. For all streams except the internal streams, the concentrations were
calculated by dividing the substance mass by the process mass. For the internal
streams, the substance mass accumulated over the run was divided by the average
process mass.
A3-2
-------
(5) Stream profiles. This column shows the mass of each substance in each stream
normalized by the total input mass of the substance to the ELI reduction process. The
profiles for each substance for each condition can be used to identify key output and
input streams. For example, for PCBs for Condition 1 Run 1 the waste oil was the main
input stream and the main output streams were the reactor grit, scrubber sludge and
scrubber decant water. Both the scrubber sludge and decant water PCS levels were
below the detection limit.
Partitioning describes the relative amount of a substance in each of the process streams.
Figures A3-1 through A3-12 illustrate the partitioning of PCBs, PCDD, PCDF, PCE, HCB,
metals, and major elements. These figures show the percentage of a substance in each stream
relative to the total mass of that substance entering the system. The streams are listed in the
following order:
Input (I)
Substance enters the system boundary during the test.
Contribution (C) Substance inside the system boundary before the test starts and is
depleted during the test.
Accumulation (A) Substance inside the system boundary before the test starts and
accumulates inside the system during the test.
Output (O)
Substance exits the system boundary during the test.
The input and contribution streams are both effectivety inputs and the output and accumulation
streams are both effectively outputs. The nomenclature included on the y-axis label is described
in the following example:
Condition ID
% of Data
'Detected
^SSl|IClRllJlOO%D
Stream ID
Direction Indicator
(I,C,OorA)
A3-3
-------
The graphs can be used to determine the critical streams influencing the ORE, DE and mass
balance closure calculations. For example, the PCB graph for Condition 1 Run 1 shows that
over 0.01 percent of the PCB input to the system exited the system in the reactor grit (SS11).
Therefore, the DE is greater than 99.9 percent (100 - 0.01) for Condition 1 Run 1.
A3-4
-------
TABLE A3-1. CONDITION 1 - POLYCHLOFUN'ATED BiPKENYLS
Condition
C1R1
C1R2
C1R3
Site
Typa
Input
Output
Internal
Input
Output
Internal
Input
Output
ntemal
ID
SSI
SS2
SS6
SS7
SS9
SS11
SS12
SS13
SS18
SS18
SS22
SSI
SS2
SS6
SS7
SS9
SS11
SS12
SS13
SS16
SS18
SS22
SS1
SS2
SS6
SS7
SS9
SS11
SS12
SS13
SS16
ssi a
SS22
Description
Waste water
Waste oil
Boiler propane
Reactor hydrogen
Boiler air
Reactor grit
Scrubber sludge
Scrubber decant water
Boiler flue gas
Heat exchanger residual
Scrubber liquor
Waste water
Waste oil
Boiler propane
Reactor hydrogen
Boiler air
Reactor grit
Scrubber sludge
Scrubber decant water
Boiler flue gas
Heat exchanger residual
Scrubber liquor
Waste water
Waste oil
Boiler propane
Reactor hydrogen
Boiler air
Reactor grit
Scrubber sludge
Scrubber decant water
Boiler flue gas
Heat exchanger residual
Scrubber liquor
DaUcted
«%)
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
0.09
6.01
58.62
76.96
0.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
8.73
0.01
60.94
76.96
99.99
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
35.39
0.01
86.97
76.96
99.99
Actual rat*
(mg/hr)
8.37E-02
4.29E+05
5.03E-03
1.70E-04
7.70E-03
1.31E+02
1.66E+01
5.98E+01
6.60E-02
C 1.34E+00
C 2.45E-04
1.73E+00
4.05E+05
5.71 E-03
9.03E-05
7.25E-03
4.78E+01
5.65E+00
6.20E+01
9.63E-03
C 1.39E+00
A 7.52E-01
4.77E-01
3.78E+05
6.39E-03
6.88E-05
7.15E-03
1.33E+01
4.08E+00
6.02E+01
2.83E-02
C 1.32E+00
A 7.52E-01
Mass"
(mg)
5.43E-01
2.48E+06
3.26E-02
1.10E-03
4.99E-02
8.48E+02
1.08E+02
3.88E+02
4.28E-01
8.68E+00
1.59E-03
1.09E+01
2.32E+06
3.59E-02
5.68E-04
4.56E-02
3.00E+02
3.55E+01
3.90E+02
6.05E-02
8.74E+00
4.73E+00
3.63E+00
2.21 E+06
4.87E-02
S.24E-04
5.44E-02
1.02E+02
3.11E+01
4.59E+02
2.16E-01
1.00E+01
5.73E+00
Concentration"
(ppbwt)
9.72E-01
2.36E+08
7.50E-01
7.97E-01
3.27E-02
9.74E+05
5.37E+03
6.15E+02
2.63E-01
1.41E+01
4.51 E-04
1.05E+01
2.38E-f08
7.50E-01
7.97E-01
3.27E-02
9.74E+05
1.77E+03
6.15E+02
4.08E-02
1.41E+01
1.34E+00
7.86E+00
2.38E+08
7.50E-01
7.97E-01
3.27E-02
9.74E+05
1.55E+03
6.15E+02
1.22E-01
1.41E+01
1.61E+00
Profile
<%)
2.19E-05
1.00E+02
1.32E-06
4.44E-08
2.01 E-06
3.42E-02
4.35E-03
1.56E-02
1.73E-05
3.50E-04
6.41E-08
4.68E-04
1.00E+02
1.55E-06
2.45E-08
1.96E-06
1.29E-02
1.53E-03
1.68E-02
2.61 E-06
3.77E-04
2.04E-04
1.64E-04
1.00E+02
2.20E-06
2.37E-08
2.46E-06
4.59E-03
1.41 E-03
2.07E-02
9.75E-06
4.53E-04
2.59E-04
• Concentration for internal streams expressed as total accumulation divided by average process mass for run.
" ORE and OE are based on mass
Coniiibuiion (C) - Substance Inside the system boundary before She test starts and !s depleted during the test
Accumulation (A) = Substance Inside the system boundary before the test starts and accumulates Inside the system during the test.
-------
TABLE A3-2. CONDITION 2 - POLVCHLORINATED BIPHENYLS
Condition
C2R1
C2R2
Sit*
Typ«
Input
•
i
Output
Internal
Input
Output
Internal
ID
SS3
SS6
SS7
SS9
SS10
SS11
SS12
SS13
SS16
SS22
SS24
SS3
SS6
SS7
SS9
SS10
SS11
SS12
SS13
SS16
SS22
SS24
Description
Waste soil
Boiler propane
Reactor hydrogen
Boiler air
Treated soil
Reactor grit
Scrubber sludge
Scrubber decant water
Boiler Hue gas
Scrubber liquor
Desorber quench water
Waste soil
Boiler propane
Reactor hydrogen
Boiler air
Treated soil
Reactor grit
Scrubber sludge
Scrubber decant water
Boiler flue gas
Scrubber liquor
Desorber quench water
Detected
(%)
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
49.56
20.28
0.38
29.29
98.82
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
49.56
20.28
0.38
85.42
92.09
99.99
Actual rate
(mg/hr)
2.66E+04
7.14E-03
7.43E-05
2.57E-01
1.74E+03 '
3.60E-01
7.04E+00
8.19E+00
1.67E-02
A 3.04E-01
C 4.17E+02
1.25E+04
1.04E-02
6.78E-05
3.68E-01
. 1.26E*02
3.83E-01
6.59E+00
7.58E+00
3.66E-01
C 2.94E+00
C 2.70E+01
M«I8"
(mg)
2.51 E+05
4.31 E-02
4.48E-04
1.55E+00
1.64E+04
2.17E+00
4.25E+01
4.94E+01
1.01E-01
1.84E+00
3.94E+03
1.02E+05
8.58E-02
5.60E-04
3.05E+00
1.03E+03
3.16E-fOO
5.45E+01
6.27E+01
3.02E+00
2.43E+01
2.20E+02
Concentration *
(ppbwt)
3.27E+05
7.50E-01
7.97E-01
9.92E-01
2.15E+04
8.71 E+03
1.51E+04
9.31 E+01
6.02E-02
5.10E-01
1.87E+03
5.19E+05
7.50E-01
7.97E-01
9.92E-01
4.87E+03
8.71 E+03
1.51E+04
9.31 E+01
9.41 E-01
6.81E+00
1.05E-t^)2
Profile
(%)
9.85E+01
1.69E-05
1.76E-07
6.09E-04
6.45E+00
8.53E-04
1.67E-02
1.94E-02
3.95E-05
7.20E-04
1.55E+00
9.98E+01
8.41 E-05
5.49E-07
2.99E-03
1.01E+00
3.10E-03
5.34E-02
6.15E-02
2.96E-03
2.38E-02
2.16E-01
I
• Concentration for Internal streams expressed as total accumulation divided by average process mass for run.
" ORE and DE are based on mass
Contribution (C) = Substance Inside the system boundary before the test starts and is depleted during the test.
Accumulation (A) = Substance inside the system boundary before the test starts and accumulates Inside the system during the test.
-------
TABLE A3-3. CONDITION 3 - POLYCHLORINATED BIPHENYLS
Condition
C3R1
,
•
C3R2
C3R3
Site
Typ«
Input
i
Output
Internal
Input
Output
Internal
Input
Output
Internal
ID
SSI
SS2
SS6
SS7
SS9
SS11
SS12
SS13
SS15
SS16
SS18
SS22
SSI
SS2
SS6
SS7
SS9
SS11
SS12
SS13
SS15
SS16
ssia
SS22
SSI
SS2
SS6
SS7
SS9
SSfl
SS12
SS13
SS15
SS16
SS18
SS22
Description
Waste Wwaler
Waste oil
Boiler propane
Reactor hydrogen
Boiler air
Reactor grit
Scrubber sludge
Scrubber decant water
Tank condensate
Boiler ilue gas
Heat exchanger residual
Scrubber liquor
Waste water
Waste oil
Boiler propane
Reactor hydrogen
Boiler air
Reactor grit
Scrubber sludge
Scrubber decant water
Tank condensate
Boiler flue gas
Heat exchanger residual
Scrubber liquor
Waste water
Waste oil
Boiler propane
Reactor hydrogen
Boiler air
Reactor grit
Scrubber sludge
Scrubber decant water
Tank condensate
Boiler flue gas
Heat exchanger residual
Scrubber liquor
Detected
(%)
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
89.93
5.81
2.99
0.19
94.90
98.81
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
89.93
22.26
2.99
0,06
96.50
98.81
8182
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
89.93
7.06
2.99
0.06
38.97
98.81
100.00
Actual rat*
(mg/hr)
8.75E+00
5.95E+06
1.30E-02
5.92E-05
3.03E-02
9.62E-01
6.49E+01
2.90E+01
2.49E+00
2.97E-01
G 9.74E+00
A 4.68E+00
2.19E-01
7.68E+06
7.42E-03
4.36E-05
1.89E-02
9.86E-01
1.30E+00
4.62E+01
1.65E+01
5.46E-01
C 3.06E+00
A 7.57E+01
1.88E-01
5.84E+06
8.74E-03
6.81 E-05
2.06E-02
9.B3E-01
2.49E+01
5.48E+01
3.12E+01
2.10E-02
C 4.13E+00
C 1.45E+00
fcUM"
(mg)
B.02E+00
4.96E+06
9.31E-02
5.42E-05
2.17E-01
8.82E-01
5.95E+01
2.66E+01
2.29E+00
2.14E+00
8.93E+00
4.29E+00
6.18E-01
•1.92E*07
9.48E-02
1.23E-04
2.42E-01
2.78E+00
3.66E+00
1.30E+02
4.64E+01
6.98E+00
8.62E+00
2.13E+02
4.82E-01
1.40E+07
2.06E-01
1.77E-04
4.88E-01
2.S6E+00
6.48E+01
1.43E+02
8.12E+01
4.96E-01
1.07E+01
3.77E+00
Concentration "
(ppbwt)
3.07E+01
2.54E+08
7.50E-01
7.97E-01
7.01 E-02
9.72E+03
1.97E+03
1.23E+02
1.23E+04
6.61 E-01
1.44E+01
1.22E+00
3.53E+00
2.53E+08
7.50E-01
7.97E-01
7.01E-02
9.72E+03
7.29E+01
1.23Et02
4.26E+04
1.93E+00
1.44E+01
5.93E+01
3.50E+00
2.53E408
7.50E-01
7.97E-01
7.01E-02
9.72E+03
1.61E+03
1.23E+02
4.26E+04
6.83E-02
1.44E+01
1.05E+00
Profile
(%)
1.62E-04
1.00E+02
1.88E-06
1.09E-O9
< 4.39E-06
1.7BE-05
1.20E-03
5.36E-04
4.61 E-05
4.31 E-05
1.80E-04
8.66E-05
3.22E-06
1.00E+02
4.94E-07
6.40E-10
1.26E-06
1.45E-05
1.91 E-05
6.77E-04
2.42E-04
3.64E-05
4.49E-05
1.11E-03
3.44E-06
1.00E+02
1.47E-06
1.26E-09
3.47E-06
1.83E-OS
4.62E-04
1.02E-03
5.79E-04
3.54E-06
7.66E-05
2.69E-05
Concentration for internal streams expressed as total accumulation divided by average process mass for run.
*• r>DC **nA nc org Kagg/j nn nrutflA .
Contribution (C) Tsubstance inside the system boundary before the test starts and is depleted during the test.
Accumulation (A) =
= Substance inside the system boundary before the test starts and accumulates inside the system during the test.
-------
TABLE A3-4. CONDITION 1 - PERCHLOROETHYLENE
Condition
C1R1
•
'•
C1R2
C1R3
Sit*
Typ*
Input
i
Output
Internal
Input
Output
Internal
Input
Output
Internal
10
SSI
SS2
SS2 SPIKE
SS6
SS7
SS9
SS11
SS12
SSI 3
SS16
SS1B
SS22
SSI
SS2
SS2 SPIKE
SS6
SS7
sse
SS11
SS12
SS13
SS16
SS18
SS22
SSI
SS2
SS2 SPIKE
SS6
SS7
SS9
SS11
SS12
SS13
SS16
SS18
SS22
Description
Waste water
Waste oil
PCE spike
Boiler propane
Reactor hydrogen
Boiler air
Reactor grit
Scrubber sludge
Scrubber decant water
Boiler flue gas
Heat exchanger residual
Scrubber liquor
Waste water
Waste oil
PCE spike
Boiler propane
Reactor hydrogen
Boiler air
Reactor grit
Scrubber etudge
Scrubber decant water
Boiler flue gas
Heat exchanger residual
Scrubber liquor
Waste water
Waste oil
PCE spike
Boiler propane
Reactor hydrogen
Boiler air
Reactor grit
Scrubber sludge
Scrubber decant water
Boiler flue gas
Heat exchanger residua!
Scrubber liquor
D*tKt»d
(%)
0.00
0.00
100.00
0.00
0.00
100.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
100.00
0.00
0.00
100.00
0.00
100.00
0.00
0.00
100.00
6.06
0.00
0.00
100.00
50.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
100.00
0.00
0.00
100.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
100.00
0.00
0.00
Actual rale
(mg/hr)
O.OOE+00
O.OOE+00
3.90E+05
O.OOE+00
O.OOE+00
1.89E-01
8.70E-04
3.68E-02
9.82E+00
9.28E-01
A O.OOE+00
C 1.17E-05
3.37E-01
O.OOE+00
3.90E+05
O.OOE+00
O.OOE+00
1.78E-01
3.18E-04
4.01 E-02
4.07E+00
3.40E-01
A O.OOE+00
A 3.92E-06
O.OOE+00
O.OOE+00
3.81 E+OS
O.OOE+00
O.OOE+00
1.75E-01
8.88E-05
3.6SE-02
1.98E+01
6.18E-01
A O.OOE+00
A 3.92E-06
Mass"
(mo)
O.OOE+00
O.OOE+00
2.25E+06
O.OOE+00
O.OOE+00
1.23E+00
S.64E-03
2.39E-01
6.37E+01
6.02E+00
O.OOE+00
7.S5E-05
2.12E+00
O.OOE+00
2.24E+06
O.OOE+00
O.OOE+00
1.12E+00
2.00E-03
2.52E-01
2.S6E+01
2.13E+00
O.OOE+00
2.46E-OS
O.OOE+00
O.OOE+00
2.23E+06
O.OOE+00
O.OOE+00
1.34E+00
6.76E-04
2.79E-01
1.51 E+02
4.71 E+00
O.OOE+00
2.98E-05
Concentration *
(ppbwt)
NA
NA
1.00E+09
NA
NA
8.02E-01
6.48E+00
1.19E+01
1.01 E+02
3.69E+00
NA
2.14E-05
2.04E+00
NA
1.00E+09
NA
NA
8.02E-01
6.48E+00
1.25E+01
4.04E+01
1.44E+00
NA
6.97E-06
NA
NA
1.00E+09
NA
NA
8.02E-01
6.48E+00
1.39E+01
2.02E+02
2.65E+00
NA
8.37E-06
Profit*
(%)
O.OOE+00
O.OOE+00
1.00E+02
O.OOE+00
O.OOE+00
5.44E-05
2.50E-07
1.06E-05
2.82E-03
2.67E-04
O.OOE+00
3.35E-09
9.47E-05
O.OOE+00
1.00E+02
O.OOE+00
O.OOE+00
5.00E-05.
8.94E-08
1.13E-05
1.1SE-03
9.55E-05
O.OOE+00
1.10E-09
O.OOE+00
O.OOE+00
f.OOE+02
O.OOE+00
O.OOE+00
6.00E-05
3.04E-08
1.25E-05
6.77E-03
2.11E-04
O.OOE+00
1.34E-09
• Concentration for intamal streams expressed as total accumulation divided by average process masa for run.
** ORE and DE are based on mass
Contribution (C) = Substance inside the system boundary before the test starts and is depleted during the test.
Accumulation (A) = Substance inside the system boundary before the Best starts and accumulates inside the system during the test.
-------
TABLE A3-S. CONDITION 2 - HEXACHLOROBENZENE
Condition
C2R1
C2R2
Site
Typ«
Input
'.
Output
Internal
Input
Output
Internal
ID
SS3
SS3 SPIKE
SS6
SS7
SS9
SS10
SS11
SS12
SSI 3
SS16
SS22
SS24
SS3
SS3 SPIKE
SS6
SS7
SS9
SS10
SS11
SS12
SS13
SS16
SS22
SS24
Description
Waste soil
HCB spike
Boiler propane
Reactor hydrogen
Boiler air
Treated soil
Reactor grit
Scrubber sludge
Scrubber decant water
Boiler flue gas
Scrubber liquor
Oesorber quench water
Waste soil
HCB spike
Boiler propane
Reactor hydrogen
Boiler air
Treated soil
Reactor grit
Scrubber sludge
Scrubber decant water
Boiler flue gas
Scrubber liquor
Desorber quench water
Detected
(%)
100.00
100.00
0.00
0.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
0.00
100.00
0.00
50.00
100.00
100.00
0.00
0.00
100.00
0.00
100.00
100.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
100.00
Actual rate
(mg/hr)
3.42E+02
1.01E+06
O.OOE+00
O.OOE+00
1.42E-01
2.80E+05
2.54E-01
7.72E+00
3.56E+00
1.28E-01
C 6.06E-01
A 6.22E+02
2.28E+02
5.92E+05
O.OOE+00
O.OOE+00
2.03E-01
8.55E-01
2.69E-01
7.22E+00
3.29E+00
1.68E-01
A 1.93E-04
C 1.79E+02
Mass"
(ing)
3.24E+03
9.53E+06
O.OOE+00
O.OOE+00
8.56E-01
2.65E+06
1.53E+00
4.66E+01
2.15E+01
7.69E-01
3.66E+00
5.87E+03
1.86E+03
4.83E+06
O.OOE+00
O.OOE+00
1.68E+00
6.97E+00
2.23E+00
5.97E+01
2.72E+01
1.39E+00
1.60E-03
1.46E+03
Concentration*
(ppbwt)
4.22E+03
1.00E+09
NA
NA
5.47E-01
3.46E+06
6.14E+03
1.66E+04
4.04E+01
4.60E-01
1.02E+00
2.78E+03
9.49E+03
1.00E+09
NA
NA
5.47E-01
3.30E+01
6.14E+03
1.66E+04
4.04E+.01
4.32E-01
4.48E-04
6.99E+02
Profile
(%)
3.40E-02
1.00E+02
O.OOE+00
O.OOE+00
8.99E-06
2.78E+01
1.61E-05
4.89E-04
2.25E-04
8.08E-06
3.84E-05
6.16E-02
3.85E-02
9.99E+01
O.OOE+00
O.OOE+00
3.48E-05
1.44E-04
4.6 IE-OS
1.24E-03
5.63E-04
2.88E-05
3.31 E-08
3.02E-02
CD
• Concentration for internal streams expressed as total accumulation divided by average process mass for^un.
" ORE and DE are based on mass
Contribution (C) * Substance Inside the system boundary before the test starts and Is depleted during the test.
Accumulation (A)» Substance Inside the system boundary before the test starts and accumulates Inside the system during the test.
-------
TABLE A3-6. CONDITION 3 - PERCHLOETHYLENE
Condition
C3R1
• ,
C3R2
C3R3
Sit.
Typ*
Input
i
Output
Internal
Input
Output_ v
Internal
Input
Output
Internal
ID
SS1
SS2
SS2 SPIKE
SS6
SS7
SS9
SS11
SS12
SS13
SS1S
SS16
SS18
SS22
SSI
SS2
SS2 SPIKE
SS6
SS7
SS9
SS11
SS12
SSI 3
SS15
SSI 6
SSI 8
SS22
SSI
SS2
SS2 SPIKE
SS6
SS7
SS9
SS11
SS12
SS13
SS15
SS16
SS18
SS22
Description
Waste water
Waste oil
PCE spike
Boiler propane
Reactor hydrogen
Boiler air
Reactor grit
Scrubber sludge
Scrubber decant water
Tank condensate
Boiler flue gas
Heat exchanger residual
Scrubber liquor
Waste water
Waste oil
PCE spike
Boiler propane
Reactor hydrogen
Boiler air
Reactor grit
Scrubber sludge
Scrubber decant water
Tank condensate
Boiler flue gas
Heat exchanger residual
Scrubber liquor
Waste water
Waste oil
PCE spike
Boiler propane
Reactor hydrogen
Boiler air
Reactor grit
Scrubber eludga
Scrubber decant water
Tank condensate
Boiler flue gas
Heat exchanger residual
Scrubber liquor
D*tsct*d
(*)
100.00
0.00
100.00
0.00
0.00
100.00
0.00
0.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
50.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
100.00
0.00
0.00
100.00
o.oo ._
0.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
50.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
100.00
0.00
0.00
100.00
0.00
0.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
50.00
100.00
Actual r«t«
(mo/hr)
2.64E+00
O.OOE+00
7.78E+05
O.OQE+00
O.OOE+00
3.92E-01
5.82E-03
1.04E-01
2.86E+00
1.62E+00
5.79E-01
C 1.57E+00
A 2.00E-05
O.OOE+00
O.OOE+00
7.84E+05
O.OOE+00
O.OOE+00
2.45E-01
5,97E-03
2.83E-02
4.55E+00
6.19E+00
9.56E-01
C 4.94E-01
C 6.38E-06
O.OOE+00
O.OOE+00
7.94E+05
O.OOE+00
O.OOE+00
2.67E-01
5.95E-03
3.67E-02
S.40E+00
1.17E+01
1.43E+00
C 6.66E-01
C 1.82E+01
Mass"
(ing)
2.42E+00
O.OOE+00
6.49E+05
O.OOE+00
O.OOE+00
2.82E+00
5.33E-03
9.54E-02
2.62E+00
1.49E+00
4.16E+00
1.44E+00
1.83E-OS
O.OOE+00
O.OOE+00
1.96E+06
O.OOE+00
O.OOE+00
3.13E+00
J.68E-02
7.96E-02
1.28E+01
1.74E+01
1.22E+01
1.39E+00
1.80E-05
O.OOE+00
O.OOE+00
1.91E+06
O.OOE+00
O.OOE+00
6.30E+00
1.55E-02
9.55E-02
1.40E+01
3.05E+01
3.38E+01
1.73E+00
4.72E+01
Concentration *
(ppbwt)
9.26E+00 •
NA
1.00E+09
NA
NA
9.08E-01
5.B8E+01
3.17E+00
1.21E+01
8.00E+03
1.29E+00
2.33E+00
5.19E-06
NA
NA
1.00E+09
NA
NA
9.08E-01
_ 5.88E+01 _
1.58E+00
1.21E+01
1.60E+04
3.39E+00
2.33E+00
4.99E-06
NA
NA
1.00E+09
NA
NA
9.08E-01
5.88E+01
2.38E+00
1.21E+01
1.60E+04
4.66E+00
2.33E+00
1.31E+01
Profit*
(%)
3.72E-04
O.OOE+00
1.00E+02
O.OOE+00
O.OOE+00
4.34E-04
822E-07
1.47E-05
4.04E-04
2.29E-04
6.42E-04
2.22E-04
2.82E-09
O.OOE+00
O.OOE+00
1.00E+02
O.OOE+00
O.OOE+00
1.60E-04
a.57E:07._
4.06E-06
6.53E-04
8.89E-04
6.24E-04
7.09E-05
9.17E-10
O.OOE+00
O.OOE+00
1.00E+02
O.OOE+00
O.OOE+00
3.31 E-04
8.12E-07
5.01 E-06
7.37E-04
1.60E-03
1.77E-03
9.09E-05
2.48E-03
Concentration for Internal streams expressed as total accumulation divided by average process mass tor run.
°* ORE and DE are based on mass
Contribution (C)« Substance Inside the system boundary before the test starts and Is depleted during the test.
Accumulation (A) - Substance Inside the system boundary before the test starts and accumulates inside (he system during the lest.
-------
TABLE A3-7. CONDITION 1 - DIOXINS
Condition
C1R1
C1R2
C1R3
Site
TVP«
Input
Output
Internal
Input
Output
Internal
Input
Output
Internal
— i — :
ID
SS1
SS2
SS11
SS12
SS13
SS16
SSI 8
SS22
SS1
SS2
SS11
SS12
SS13
SS16
SS18
SS22
SS1
SS2
SS11
SS12
SS13
SS16
SS18
SS22
Description
Waste water
Waste oil
Reactor grit
Scrubber sludge
Scrubber decant water
Boiler flue gas
Heat exchanger residual
Scrubber liquor
Waste water
Waste oil
Reactor grit
Scrubber sludge
Scrubber eecant water
Boiler flue gas
Heat exchanger residual
Scrubber liquor
Waste water
Waste oil
Reactor grit
Scrubber sludge
Scrubber decant water
Boiler flue gas
Heat exchanger residual
Scrubber liquor
Detected
(%)
100.00
100.00
23.57
80.01
4.50
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
23.57
80.01
4.50
91.63
100.00
33.43
100.00
100.00
23.57
80.01
4.50
97.85
100.00
33.43
Actual rate
(mg/hr)
1.31E-05
3.26E-02
3.95E-06
7.82E-03
3.73E-04
1.79E-04
C 2.35E-05
A 1.35E-04
1.17E-04
3.08E-02
1.44E-06
8.52E-03
3.87E-04
3.63E-05
C 2.44E-05
A 1.56E-05
4.13E-05
2.88E-02
4.03E-07
7.77E-03
3.76E-04
2.33E-05
C 2.31 E-05
A 1.56E-05
Has*"
(mg)
8.51 E-05
1.89E-01
2.56E-05
5.07E-02
2.42E-03
1.16E-03
1.52E-04
8.76E-04
7.33E-04
1.76E-01
9.07E-06
5.35E-02
2.43E-03
2.28E-04
1.54E-04
9.81 E-05
3.15E-04
1.68E-01
3.07E-06
5.92E-02
2.86E-03
1.78E-04
1.76E-04
1.19E-04
Concentration *
(ppbwt)
1.52E-04
1.81E+01
2.94E-02
2.52E+00
3.84E-03
7.14E-04
2.47E-04
2.48E-04
7.07E-04
1.81E401
2.94E-02
2.66E+00
3.84E-03
1.53E-04
2.47E-04
2.78E-05
6.BOE-04
1.81E+O1
2.94E-02
2.95E+00
3.84E-03
1.00E-04
2.47E-04
3.34E-05
Prdlle
(%)
4.50E-02
9.99E-t01
1.35E-02
2.68E+01
1.28E+00
6.16E-01
8.06E-02
4.63E-01
4.14E-01
9.95E+01
5.11E-03
3.02E4O1
1.37E+00
1.28E-01
8.66E-02
5.53E-02
1.86E-01
9.97E+01
1.82E-03
3.51 E+01
1.70E+00
1.05E-01
1.04E-01
7.05E-02
• Concentration for Internal streams expressed as total accumulation divided by average process mass for run.
" ORE and DE are based on mass
Contribution (C)- Substance inside the system boundary before the test starts and is depleted duringithe test.
Accumulation (A) - Substance inside the system boundary before the test starts and accumulates inside the system during the test.
-------
TABLE A3-8. CONDITION 2 - DIOXINS
Condition
C2R1
C2R2
Sit*
Typ«
Input
Output
Internal
Input
Output
Internal
ID
SS3
SS3 SPIKE
SS10
SS11
SS12
SS13
SS16
SS22
SS24
SS3
SS3 SPIKE
SS10
SS11
SS12
SS13
SS16
SS22
SS24
Description
Waste soil
HCB spike
Treated soil
Reactor grit
Scrubber sludge
Scrubber decant water
Boiler flue gas
Scrubber liquor
Desorber quench water
Waste soil
HCB spike
Treated soil
Reactor grit
Scrubber sludge
Scrubber decant water
Boiler flue gas
Scrubber liquor
Desorber quench water
Detected
(%)
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
8.01
97.83
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
8.01
96.25
49.49
98.51
Actual rate
(mg/hr)
4.06E-01
5.94E+01
3.43E+01
4.79E-05
1.26E-01
4.86E-04
5.09E-05
A 7.11E-04
A 2.2BE-03
4.29E-02
3.49E-KM
7.04E-02
5.08E-05
1.18E-01
4.50E-04
2.93E-05
C 1.01E-05
C 7.61 E-03
Mass"
(mg)
3.84E-H30
5.61 E*02
3.24E+02
2.89E-04
7.60E-01
2.93E-03
3.07E-04
4.29E-03
2.15E-02
3.49E-01
2.84E+02
5.73E-01
4.20E-04
9.74E-01
3.72E-03
2.42E-04
8.34E-05
6.20E-02
Concentration *
(ppbwt)
5.01 E+00
5.B9E+04
4.23E+02
1.16E4OO
2.70E402
5.52E-03
1.84E-04
1.19E-03
1.02E-02
1.78E400
5.89E+04
2.72E*00
1.16E400
2.70E4O2
5.52E-03
7.53E-OS
2.34E-05
2.97E-02
Profile
(%)
6.79E-01
9.93E+01
5.73E+01
5.11E-05
1.35E-01
5.19E-04
5.44E-05
7.59E-04
3.81 E-03
1.23E-01
9.99E+O1
2.01 E-01
1.48E-04
3.42E-01
1.31 E-03
8.51 E-05
2.93E-05
2.18E-02
ro
4 ConcentraUon for Internal streams expressed as total accumulation divided by average process mass for run.
" ORE and DE are based on mass
Contribution (C) = Substance Inside the system boundary before the test starts and Is depleted during the test.
Accumulation (A) - Substance inside the system boundary before the test starts and accumulates Inside the system during the test.
-------
TABLE A3-9. CONDITION 3 - DIOXINS
Condition
C3R1
C3R2
C3R3
Site
Type
Input
Output
Internal
Input
Output
Internal
Input
Output
Internal
ID
SS1
SS2
SS11
SS12
SS13
SS1S
SS16
SS18
SS22
SS1
SS2
SS11
SS12
SS13
SS15
SS16
SS18
SS22
SS1
SS2
SS11
SS12
SS13
SS1S
SS16
SS18
SS22
Description
Waste water
Waste oil
Reactor grit
Scrubber sludge
Scrubber decant water
Tank condensate
Boiler flue gas
Heat exchanger residual
Scrubber liquor
Waste water
Waste oil
Reactor grit
Scrubber sludge
Scrubber decant water
Tank condensate
Boiler flue gas
Heat exchanger residual
Scrubber liquor
Waste water
Waste oil
Reactor grit
Scrubber sludge
Scrubber decant water
Tank condensate
Boiler flue gas
Heat exchanger residual
Scrubber liquor
Detected
•<*)
100.00
100.00
7.43
77.26
44.44
4.45
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
7.43
77.26
44.44
4.45
96.99
100.00
67.43
100.00
100.00
7.43
77.26
44.44
4.45
97.56
100.00
100.00
Hate
(mg/hr)
1.20E-03
3.97E-01
1.61E-04
2.29E-02
1.24E-04
6.56E-06
3.50E-05
C 3.55E-04
A 1.48E-02
6.18E-06
5.13E-01
1.65E-04
6.21 E-03
1.97E-04
1.25E-05
3.10E-05
C 1.12E-04
A 7.47E-04
7.92E-06
• 3.90E-01
1.64E-04
8.07E-03
2.34E-04
2.37E-05
2.24E-05
C 1.51E-04
C 4.04E-03
M«M"
(mg)
1.10E-03
3.31 E-01
1.47E-04
2.10E-02
1.14E-04
6.02E-O6
2.51 E-04
3.26E-04
1.36E-02
1.74E-05
1.28E+00
4.64E-04
1.75E-02
5.55E-04
3.52E-05
3.96E-04
3.14E-04
2.10E-03
2.06E-05
9.35E-O1
4.27E-04
2.10E-02
6.09E-04
6.16E-05
6.28E-04
3.92E-04
1.05E-02
Concentration *
(PPbwt)
4.21 E-03
1.70E+01
1.62E+00
6.96E-01
5.26E-04
3.24E-02
7.78E-05
5.27E-04
3.85E-03
9.94E-05
1.69E401
1.62E-MX)
3.48E-01
5.26E-04
3.24E-02
1.10E-04
5.27E-04
S.85E-04
1.49E-04
1.69E4O1
1.62E+OO
5.22E-01
5.26E-04
3.24E-02
7.28E-05
5.27E-04
2.92E-03
Profile
(%)
3.30E-01
9.96E+O1
4.43E-02
6.31 E+00
3.42E-02
1.81 E-03
7.56E-02
9.80E-02
4.09E+00
1.36E-03
1.00E+02
3.62E-02
1.37E+00
4.33E-02
2.75E-03
3.09E-02
2.45E-02
1.64E-01
2.18E-03
9.88E-fO1
4.51 E-02
2.22E+00
6.43E-02
6.51 E-03
5.58E-02
4.14E-02
1.11 E+00
b)
" Concentration for internal streams expressed as total accumulation divided by average process mass for run.
'* ORE and DE are based on mass
Contribution (C) > Substance Inside the system boundary before the test starts and is depleted during the test.
Accumulation (A) • Substance inside the system boundary before the test starts and accumulates Inside the system during the test.
-------
TABLE A3-10. CONDITION 1 - FURANS
Condition
C1R1
C1R2
C1R3
515
Typ«
Input
,
Output
Internal
Input
Output
Internal
Input
Output
Internal
ID
- '
SS1
SS2
SS11
SS12
SS13
SS16
SS18
SS22
SS1
SS2
SS11
SS12
SS13
SS16
SS18
SS22
SS1
SS2
SS11
SS12
SS13
SS16
SS18
SS22
Description
Waste water
Waste oil
Reactor grit
Scrubber sludge
Scrubber decant water
Boiler flue gas
Heat exchanger residual
Scrubber liquor
Waste water
Waste oil
Reactor grit
Scrubber sludge
Scrubber decant water
Boiler flue gas
Heat exchanger residual
Scrubber liquor
Waste water
Waste oil
Reactor grit
Scrubber sludge
Scrubber decant water
Boiler flue gas
Heat exchanger residual
Scrubber liquor
fatected
(%)
100.00
100.00
100.00
75.88
5.07
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
75.88
5.07
100.00
100.00
58.73
100.00
100.00
100.00
75.88
5.07
33.31
100.00
58.73
Actual rat*
(mg/hr)
7.56E-06
3.21 E+OO
4.32E-05
1.45E-03
3.95E-04
2.02E-04
C 2.58E-05
C 3.37E-05
9.84E-05
3.03E-»00
1.58E-05
1.58E-03
4.10E-04
1.33E-05
C 2.68E-05
A 1.20E-04
1.35E-OS
2.83E400
4.41 E-06
1.44E-03
3.98E-04
8.37E-07
C 2.53E-05
A 1.20E-04
M«M"
(mg)
4.90E-05
1.88E401
2.80E-04
9.41 E-03
2.56E-03
1.31 E-03
1.67E-04
2.19E-04
6.18E-04
1.74E+01
9.92E-05
9.93E-03
2.58E-03
8.34E4J5
1.68E-04
7.55E-04
1.03E-04
1.66E401
3.38E-05
1.10E-02
3.03E-03
6.38E-06
1.93E-04
9.16E-04
Concentration *
(ppbwt)
8.77E-05
1.78E+03
3.22E-01
4.68E-01
4.07E-03
8.05E-04
2.71 E-04
6.20E-05
5.96E-04
1.78E+03
3.22E-01
4.94E-01
4.07E-03
5.62E-05
2.71 E-04
• 2.14E-04
2.22E-04
1.78E+03
3.22E-01
5.46E-01
4.07E-03
3.60E-06
2.71 E-04
2.57E-04
Profile
(%)
2.64E-04
1.00E+02
1.51 E-03
5.07E-02
1.38E-02
7.07E-03
8.99E-04
1.18E-03
3.56E-03
1.00E+02
5.72E-04
5.72E-02
1.48E-02
4.80E-04
"" 9.69E-04
4.35E-03
6.22E-04
1.00E+02
2.03E-04
6.63E-02
1.83E-02
3.85E-05
1.17E-03
5.53E-03
• Concentration for Internal streams expressed as total accumulation divided by average process mass for run.
*' ORE and DE are based on mass
Contribution (C)» Substance inside Sha system boundary before the test starts and is depleted during the test.
Accumulation (A)» Substance Inside the system boundary before the test starts and accumulates inside the system during the test.
-------
TABLE A3-11. CONDITION 2 - FURANS
C2R1
C2R2
sit: ; ; : — •
Typ«
Input
tl
Ouput
Internal
Input
Output
ntemal
ID
_t
SS3
SS3 SPIKE
SS10
SS11
SS12
SS13
SS16
SS22
SS24
SS3
SS3 SPIKE
SS10
SS11
SS12
SS13
SS16
SS22
SS24
Description
Waste soil
HOB spike
Treated soil
Reactor grit
Scrubber sludge
Scrubber decant water
Boiler flue gas
Scrubber liquor
Desorber quench water
Waste soil
HCB spike
Treated soil
Reactor grit
Scrubber sludge
Scrubber decant water
Boiler flue gas
Scrubber liquor
Desorber quench water
Detected
(%)
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
6.35
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
6.35
58.82
100.00
100.00
Actual rate
(mg/hr)
7.68E-01
2.06E401
9.S7E-KX)
1.18E-04
2.02E-01
4.14E-04
3.51 E-05
C 1.39E-03
C 6.75E-03
1.87E-01
1.21E-I01
3.92E-02
1.25E-04
1.89E-01
3.84E-04
6.23E-06
C 8.92E-05
C 3.13E-03
Mas*"
img)
7.26E+00
1.95E-t02
9.05E+01
7.12E-04
1.22E400
2.50E-03
2.11E-04
8.37E-03
6.38E-02
1.52E+00
9.86E+01
3.19E-01
1.04E-03
1.56E+00
3.17E-03
5.15E-05
7.38E-04
2.55E-02
Concentration *
(ppbwt)
9.47E+00
2.04E+O4
1.18E402
2.86E+OO
4.32E+02
4.71 E-03
1.26E-04
2.33E-03
3.02E-02
7.76E4OO
2.04E+04
1.51E+00
2.86E+00
4.32E+02
4.71 E-03
1.60E-05
2.07E-04
1.22E-02
Profile
(%)
3.59E+00
9.64E4O1
4.48E401
3.53E-04
6.02E-01
1.24E-03
1.05E-04
4.15E-03
3.16E-02
1.52E+00
9.85E+01
3.19E-01
1.03E-03
1.56E+OO
3.17E-03
5.14E-05
7.37E-04
2.54E-02
tn
* Concentration for Internal streams expressed as total accumulation divided by average process mass for run.
** ORE and DE are based on mass
Contribution (C) - Substance Inside the system boundary before the test starts and Is depleted during the test.
Accumulation (A) - Substance Inside the system boundary before the test starts and accumulates inside the system during the test.
-------
TABLE A3-12. CONDITION 3 - FURANS
Condition
C3R1
C3Hi
- - - -
C3R3
Site
Typ«
nput
Output
Internal
Input
Output
Internal
Input
Output
internal
D
SSI
SS2
SS11
SS12
SS13
SS15
SS16
SS1B
SS22
SS1
SS2
SS11
SS12
SS13
SS1S
SS16
SS18
SS22
SS1
SS2
SS11
SS12
SS13
SS15
SS16
SS13
SS22
Description
Waste water
Waste oil
Reactor grit
Scrubber sludge
Scrubber decant water
Tank condensate
Boiler flue gas
Heat exchanger residua)
Scrubber liquor
Waste water
Waste oil
Reactor grit
Scrubber sludge
Scrubber decant water
Tank oondensate
Boiler flue gas
Heat exchanger residual
Scrubber liquor
Waste water
Waste oil
Reactor grit
Scrubber sludge
Scrubber decant water
Tank condensate
Boiler flue gas
I Heat exchanger residual
Scrubber liquor
Detected
<*)
100.00
100.00
0.64.
100.00
t
0.00
0.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
0.64
100.00
0.00
0.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
0.64
100.00
0.00
0.00
52.38
100.00
100.00
Actual rate
(mglhr)
5.27E-04
4.73E401
3.65E-04
1.77E-02
4.49E-04
5.06E-06
2.06E-05
A 6.15E-04
A 1.56E-02
7.48E-07
6.11E*01
3.74E-04
4.82E-03
7.14E-04
9.63E-06
S.74E-05
A 1.93E-04
C 2.56E-03
1.39E-06
4.64E-»01
3.73E-04
8.26E-03
8.48E-04
1.83E-05
3.44E-06
A 2.61 E-04
C 4.61 E-03
MW*
(mg)
4.83E-04
3.94E+01
3.35E-04
1.63E-02
4.11E-04
4.64E-06
1.48E-04
5.64E-04
1.43E-02
2.11E-06
1.53E402
1.05E-03
1.36E-02
2.01 E-03
2.71 E^>5
7.34E-04
5.44E-04
7.21 E-03
3.62E-06
1.11E+02
9.71 E-04
1.63E-02
2.20E-03
4.7SE-05
8.12E-05
6.78E-04
1.20E-02
Concentration *
(ppbwt)
1.BSE-03
2.02E+03
3.69E-fOQ
5.40E-01
1.90E-03
2.49E-02
4.57E-05
9.12E-04
4.05E-03
1.20E-05
2.01 E403
3.69E400
2.70E-01
1.SOE-03
2.49E-02
2.03E-04
9.12E-04
2.00E-03
2.01 E+03
3.69E-rOO
4.05E-01
1.90E-03
2.49E-02
1.12E-05
9.12E-04
3.33E-03
Profile
<%)
1.23E-03
1.00E402
8.49E-04
4.13E-02
1.04E-03
1.18E-05
3.75E-04
1.43E-03
3.63E-02
1.38E-06
1.00E-r02
6.91 E-04
8.89E-03
1.32E-03
1.78E-05
4.81 E-04
3.56E-04
4.73E-03
1.00E+02
8.71 E-04
1.46E-02
1.98E-03
4.26E-05
7.29E-05
6.08E-04
1.08E-02
o>
• Concentration tor Internal streams expressed as total accumulation divided by average process mass tor run.
CcfltributlcflfCi.lubstancTlnsWe the system boundary before the test starts and is depleted during the test.
A^mutatton(A) -Substance Inside the system boundary before the test starts and accumulates inside the system during the test.
-------
PCSC2
PROFILE (%)
9 9
o o
4 iii
£ s? : s
1 1 1 3= 3 9,
PCBC3
PROFILE (%)
PC8C1
PRORU:(%)
SS3I.C2R1.100.0%O
SJS6I.C2R1.100.0*0
SS7I.CZH1,100.0%O
SS9I.C2tt.100.0%O
SS24C.C2R1.100.0XO
S822A,C2R1.98.8%O
SS10O.C2R1,100.0%O
SS11O.C2R1.49.6%O
SS12O.C2S1,20.3%O
SSI 3O.C2R1.0.4%D
SS16O.C2fl1.29.3%0
SJOI.C2R2.100.0%O
SS6I.C2R2.100.0%O
SS7I.C2R2.100.0%O
SS9I.C2H2.100.0%O
SSi2C.C2fl2.92,1 SO
SS24C.C2R2.100.0%O
SS100,C2R2.100.0%O
SSI 1O.C2R2.49.BSO
SS1;X>,C2R2.20.3%O
SSt30.C2S2.0.4%0
SS1(!O.C2R2.BS.4%0
SS1I.C3R1,100.0%O
SSa.C3R1,100.0%D
"sS6l.C3R1.lbO.05U>
SS7I.C3R1.100.0%0
SS9I.C3R1,100.0*O
SS18C.C3R1.98.8%0
SS22A.C3H1.100.0%O
SS11O.C3R1,89.9%D
SS120.C3R1.5.8%0
SS13O.C3H1.3.0%O
SS1SO.C3R1.0.2%O
SS16O.C3H1,94.9%O
SS1I,C3R2.100.0%O
SS2I.C3R2.100.0%O
SS6I.C3R2.100.0%O
SS7I.C3R2.100.0%0
SS9I.C3R2.100.0%O
SS18C.C3R2.98.81U3
SS22A.C3R2.8131U3
SS11O.C3R2.89.9%O
SS12O.C3R2.22.3%O
SS13O.C3R2.3.0%O
SS1SO.C3R2.0.1%O
SS160.C3R2.96.5%0
SS1I.C3R3.100.0%O
SSZi.C3R3.100.0%0
SSffl.C3R3.ioO.O%0
SS7I.C3R3.100.0%O
SS9I.C3R3.100.0%O
SSiaC.C3R3.98.a%O
SS22C,C3R3,100.0%Q
SS11O,C3R3.89.9%O
SS12O.C3R3.7.1%O
SS130.C3R3.3.0%0
SS1SO.C3H3.0.1%D
SS160.C3R3.39.0%0
R1
R2
R3
SSH,C1R1.100.0%O
SS3l.C1R1.100.CrUD
SS6I.C1R1.100.0%O
SS7I.C1R1.100.0SO
SS9I,C1R1.100.0%O
SS18C,C1R1.77.0%O
SS22C.C1R1,0.0%0
SS11O.C1R1.100.0%O
SS12O.C1H1.0.1%O
SS13O.C1R1.0.0%O
SS16O.C1R1,S8.6%O
SS1I.C1H2,100.0%O
SS21,C1R2,100.0%O
SS6I.C1RZ.100.0%O
SS7I.C1R2,100.0%0
SS9I,C1R2,100.0%0
SS18C.C1H2.77.0%O
SSZ2A.C1R2.100.0%0
SS11O,C1R2,100.0%O
SS120.C1R2J.7%0
SS13O.C1R2.0.0%O
SS16O.C1R2.80.9%O
SS1I.C1R3,100.0%O
SS2I,C1R3,100.0%O
SS8),C1R3.100.0%O
SS71.C1R3.100.0%O
SS«.C1R3.100.0%O
SS1«:,C1R3,77X>%O
SS22A,C1R3,10aO%O
SS11O.C1R3.100.0%O
SS12O.C1R3JS.4%O
SS13O.C1R3,0.0%0
SSieO.C1R3.87.0%O
R2
R3
Figure A3-1. Partitioning of PCB«.
A3-17
-------
Hcacz
PROFILE CM
2"" o o -* ^ — ^
— i 5 S » » »
o o o o 3 o 3
, » » o - «> - %
P6RCC3
PROFILE (%)
PERCC1
PROFILE CM
f I i I ;r s
SS3I.C2RUOO.O%0
SS3 SP1KEl.C2flt.100 0%O
SSW,C2R1.0.0%D
SS71.C2R1.0,0%0
SSSI,C2R1.100.0%0
SS22C.C2H1.0.0%0
SS24A.C2H1.SO.O%0
ssioo.c2Ri.ioo.o%o
SSIIO.CZfll.100.0%0
SSt20.C2R1.100.0%D
SS13O.C2fl1.0,OKO
SS16O.C2R1.100.0%0
SS3J.C2RZ100,0%0
SS3 SP1KE!,C2R2.100.0%O
SS«I.C2ft2.0.0%0
SS7I.CaR2,0.0%0
SSai.C2R2.100.ffKO
SS2*C.C2R2,1000%0
SS22A.C2R2.00%0
SS10O.C2R2.0.0XO
SSt1O.C2R2.100.OKO
SS12O.C2R2.100.0%O
SS13O.C2ft2,O.OXO
SS16O.C2fe.O.O%0
f 1
SSII.C3R1.100.0*0
SS2I.C3R1.0.0*P
SSZ SP1KEI.C3flt.100 0%0
SS6I.C3R1,0.0%P
SS7I.C3R1.0.0%6
SSSI.C3R1.100.0%b
SS18C.C3R1,50.0%0
SS22A.C3R1.0.0%0
SSI 1O.C3H1.0.0*0
SS12O.C3R1.0.0*0
SS13O.C3H1.100,0*0
SS1SO.C3R1.100.0%b
SS16O.C3R),100.0*0
SStl.C3R2.0.0%D
SS2I.C3RZO.ONO
SSZ SPIKEI.C3RZ.100.0%0
SS8I.C3RZO.O%0
SS7I.C3R2.0.0%O
SS8I.C3RZ.100.0%p
SS18C.C3R2.SO.O%0
SS22C.C3flZ.O.O%0
SS1l6.C3RZ.O.O%0
SS12O.C3R2.0.0%b
SS13O.C3RZ.100.0%0
SS1SO.C3R2.100.0%S
SSieO.C3R2.100.0%0
SStl.C3R3.0.0%O
SS2I.C3R3.0.0%0
SSZ SP1Ke.C3R3.tOO.O%0
ssei.C3Fao.o%o
SS7I.C3PO.O.OKO
SS9I.C3R3.100.0%O
SS18C.C3R3.SO.O%O
SS22C.C3R3,100.0%0
SS11O.C3ra.O.O%0
SS12O.C3FB.O.O%O
SS13O.C3ft3,100.0%0
SS150.C3R3.100.0-HO
SS10O.C3R3.100.0%0
1 % 3-
R1
ss2i.cim.o.o%o
SS2 SPIKEI.C1R1.100.0%0
ss6i.cint.o.o%o
ss7t,cini.o.o%o
SSW.C1R1.100.0%0
SS22C.C1R1.0.0%0
SS18A,Ctai.O.O%0
ssiio,cmi.o.o%o
SS12O.C1R1,0.0%Q
SS13O,CtR1.0.0%0
SS1I.C1R2.100.0%0
SS2t.C1R2.0.0%0
SSZ SP1KEI,C1RZ.100.0%0
SS8I.C1R2.0.0%O
SS7I.C1RZO.O%O
SS8I.C1R2.100.0%0
SS18A.C1R2.SO.CW.O
SSZZA.CIRZ.0.0%0
SS11O.C1RZ.O.O%0
SS1ZO.C1R2.0.0%0
SS139.C1FIZ.O.O%0
SSiaO.C1R2.10Q.O%0
SS1I.C1R3.0.0%Q
SS21,C1R3.e.O%O
SSZ SP1KH.C1R3.108,0%0
SS8(.C1R3,0.0%O
SS7t.C1R3.0.0%O
ssw.ciFa.ioo.o%o
SS18A.C1R3.0.0%0
SS22A.C1R3.0.014O
SS110.C1R3,0.0%D
SS12O.C1R3.0.0HD
SS13O.C1R3,0.0%0
SSieO.C1R3.100.0%P
R1
Figure A3-2. Partttionlng of PCE and HCB.
A3-18
-------
OIOXIN C?
PROFILE (%)
SS3I.C2flt.tOO.O%0
SS3 SPIKEI.C2H1.100,0%O
SS22A,C2R1.100.0*0
SS24A.C2R1.IOD.0%0
SS100.C2R1,100.0%0
SS11O,C2H1,100.0%0
SS12O,C2H1,100.0%0
Si>3 SPIKEI.C2R2.100.0%O
CXOXIN C)
PROFILE (%)
I 1 1 I S « «
SS1I.C3R1.100.0HO
SS2I.C3R1.100.0%O
SS18C.C3fl1.100.0%O
SS22A.C3R1.100.0%D
SS11O.C3R1.7.4%6
SS12O.C3H1.77.3%D
SS13O.C3R1.44.4%0
SS15O.C3R1,4.5%O
SS16O.C3R1,tOO.O%O
SS1I.C3R2.100.0%0
SS2I,C3R2.100.0%D
SS18C.C3RZ)00.0%O
SS22A.C3R2.S7.4XO
SS1 1O.C3RZ,7.4%O
SSI 2O,C3R2,77.3%0
SS13O.C3R2.44.4%O
SS15O,C3R2.4.5%O
SStl,C3R3,100.0%0
SS2t.C3R3.100.0%D
SS18C.C3R3.100.0%0
SS22C,C3R3.100.0%O
SS11O,C3R3.7.4%0
SS12O,C3FO,77.3%O
SS13O.C3R3.44.4%0
SS1SO.C3K3.4.5%O
SS16O,C3«3,97.6%O
R1
R2
R3
SS1I.C1R1.100.0%0
SS2I.C1R1.100.0%D
SS18C.C1R1.100.0%0
SS22A.C1R1,100.0%0
SS11O.C1RI .23.6*0
SS12O,C1R130.0%0
SS13O.C1R1.4.S%O
SS16O.C1R1.10Q.O%O
SS1I.C1R2.100.0%0
SS2I.C1R2.10a.O%0
ssiac.ctR2.ioo.o%o
SS22A.C1R2,3a4%O
SS11O.C1R223.6%O
SS12O.C1R230.0%0
SS13O.C1R2,4.5%O
SS1I.CtR3,1
-------
FURANC2
PROFILE (%)
X I I S S S S
o q p p o o 3
FURANC1
PROFILE (%>
S
SS3I.C2R1.100,0%0
SS3 SPtKEI.CZfll.100,0%0
SS22C,C2fl1.100.0%0
SSIOO.CZfll. 100,0*0
SS110.C2R1.100.0%0
SS12O.C2fl1.100.0%0
SS13O,C2fl1.8.4%D
SSieO.C2R1,100.0%O
SS3I,C2RZ100,0%0
SS3 SPIKEI.CaRZ.100.0%0
SS22C.C2f%100.0%0
SSZ4C.C2R2.100.0%0
SS1CO,C2K2.100.0%D
SS11O.C2ft2,100.0%0
SS12O.C2ft2.100.0%O
SS13O.C2R2.«.4%O
SSieO.C2RZ.S8.ffKO
R1
RZ
SS1I.C3R1.100.0%0
SS2I.C3R1.100.0%0
SS18A.C3R1.100.0%O
SS22A,C3R1.100.0%D
SS11O.C3R1.0.6%0,
SS12O.C3R1.tOO.O%D
SS13O.C3R1,0.0%D
SS1SO.C3R1.0.0%0
SSieO.C38!,1CO.O%0
SS1I.C3R2.100.0%0
SS2I.C3R2.100.0%0
SS22C.C3R2.100.0%0
SS18A.C3R2.100.0%O
SS11O.C3R2.0.e%0
SS120.C3R2.100.0%0
SS130,C3R2.0.0%0
SS1SO.C3R2,0.0%D
SS16O.C3R2.100.0%p
SS1I.C3R3.100.0%b
SS2t.C3FI3.100.0%0
SS22C.C3R3.100.0%O
SS18A.C3R3.100.0%O
SS11O.C3KS.0.8%0
SS120.C3R3.100.CKO
SS13O.C3R3.0.0%0
SS15O,C3R3.0.0%D
SSieO.C3R3.S2.4%0
R1
R3
SS1I.C1R1.100.0%0
SS2I.C1R1.100.0%O
SS18C.C1R1,100.0%0
SS22C.C1R1.100.0%0
SS11O.C1R1.100.0%D
SS12O.C1R1.75.9%O
SS13O.C1R1,S.1%0
SS16O.C1R1.100.0%O
ssii.ciRa.ioo.o%o
SS2I.C1R2.100.0%0
SS18C.C1R2,100.0%D
SS22A.C1R2.Sa.7%0
SS11O.C1RZ.100.0%0
SS12O.C1R2.7S.9%0
SS130.C1R2.5.1%0
SS19O.eiFffi,100.0%0
SS1l,CiFS.lOO.-0%0
SS2t,C1R3,100.0%0
SS18C.C1R3.100.O%D
SSZ2A.C1R3,S&7%0
SS11O.C1R3.100.0%O
SS12O.C1R3,7S.9%O
SS13O.C1R3.ai%0
SS1flO.C1R3.33.3%O
R1
R3
Figure A3-4. PartKioning of furans.
A3-20
-------
BARIUM
PROFILE (%)
S S 8 8 §
. ARSENIC
PROFILE (%)
ANTIMONY
PROFILE (%)
SSII.CI.100.0%0
SS2I.C1.100.0%D
ss4i,qi.o.o%o
SS5I.C1,0.0%0,
SS22C.C1.100.0%0
SS18A,C1.1QO.O%0
SSt 1O,C1,100.0%0
SS13O.C1.100.0%O
ssi6O.ei.ioo.o%o
SS3I.C2,100.0%0
SS4I.C2.0.0%O
SS5I,C2.0.0%D
: SS20A,C2.0.0%D
!5S22A,C2.100.0%O
8S24A,C2.100.0%D
SS10O,C2,100.0%O
SSI 1O.C2.100.0%D
SS13O.C2.0.0%D
SS16O.C2,100.0%O
SS1I.C3,100.0%0
SS2I.C3.100.0%O
SS4I,C3.0.0%O
SSSI,C3.0.0%D
SS18A,C3.tOO.O%O
SS22A,C3,ioO.O%O
SiS11O.C3.100.0%O
SS13O.C3.100.0%O
SJ5150.C3,100.0*0
Si>16O.C3.100.0%O
.SS1I.C1.0.OXO
SS2I,C1.0.0%0
SS4I.C1.0.0%0
SS5I.C1,0.0%0
SS22C.C1,0.0%0
SS18A,C1.0.0%0
SS11O.C1,100.0%O
SS13O,C1,0.0%0
SS16O.C1,0.0%D
SS3I,C2.100.0%D
SS4).C2.0.0%0
SSSI,C2.0.0%0
SS22C,C2,0.0%D
SS24C.C2.Q.O%O
SS20A.C2.0.0%O
SS10O,C2,91.9%O
SS11O.C2.100.0%O
SS13O.C2,0.0%D
SS160.C2,0.0%0
SS1I,C3,55.9%0
SS2I,C3.0.0%O
SS4«.C3.0.0%O
SSSI.C3,0.0%0
SS18C,C3.100.0%O
SS22A.C3.100.0%0
SS11O.C3,100.0%O
SS13O.C3.0.0%0
SS15O.C3.0.0%O
SS16O.C3.0.0%O
SS1I.C1.0.0%0
SS2I.C1.0.0%0
SS4I.C1.0.0%6
SSSI.C1.0.0%0
SS22C.C1.0.0%O
SS18A.C1.0.0%0
SS11O.C1.0.0%0
SS13O.C1,0.0%0
SS18O.C1.37.5%O
SS3!,C2.0.0%0
SS4I.C2.0.0%0
SSSI.C2.Q.O%D
SS22C.C2.0.0SO
SS24C,C2.0.0%O
SS20A.C2.0.0%0
SS10O,C2.100.0%0
SS11O.C2.0.0%0
SS13O.C2.0.0%O
SS16O.C2.100.0%O
SS1I.C3,0.0%0
SS2I,C3,0.0%0
SS4I.C3.0.0%0
SS5I.C3.0.0%0
SS18A.C3.0.0%O
SS22A,C3.0.0%O
SS11O.C3.0.0%O
SS130.C3,aO%0
SS15O,C3,aO%0
SS16O.C3.100.0%0
C1
c:
Figure A3-5. Partitioning of antimony, arsenic, and barium.
A3-21
-------
CARBON
PROFILE (%)
CADMIUM
PROFILE (%)
BERYLUUM
PROFILE (%)
SS1I.C1.100,0*0
SS2I.C1.100.0%0
SS6J.C1.100.0%0
ssieA,ci.ioo.o%o
SS22A,C1.100.0%0
SS11O.C1.100.0%D
SS13O.C1.100.0%0
SS16O.C1.100.0%0
SS31.C2.100.0%0
SS6I.C2.100.0SO
SS22C.C2.100.0%0
SS2«C.C2.100.0%0
SS10O.C2,100.0%0
SS11O,C2.100.0%0
SS13O.C2.100.0%O
SS16O.C2.100.0%0
SS1I.C3.100.0%0
SS2I.C3.100.0*D
SS8I.C3.100.0%0
SS22C.C3.100.0%0
SS18A.CG.100.0-40
SS11O.C3,100.0%O
SS13O.C3.100.0XO
SS15O,C3.100.0%0
SS160.C3.100.0%0
SS1I.C1.0.0%D
SS2I.C1,0.0%0
SS4I.C1.0.0*0 !
SS5I.C1.0.0%0
SS22C,C1.0.0%0
SS18A.C1.0.0%0
SS11O,C1,0.0%0
SS13O,C1.0.0%0
SS16O.C1.84.2%0
SS3I.C2.91.1%O
SS4t.C2.0.0%0
SS5I.C2.0.0%0
SS22C.C2.0.0%0
SS24C.C2.0.0%0
SS20A.C2.0.0%O
SS10O.C2.100.Cr4O
SS11O.C2.100.0%D
SS13O.C2.0.0%0
SS1«O.C2.68.fl%0
SS1I.C3.0.0%0
SS2I.C3.100.0%0
SS4).C3.0.0%0
SS5t.C3.0.0%O
SS18A,C3.aO%O
SS22A,C3,0.0%8
SS11O.C3,0.0%0
SS13O.C3.0.0%0
SS15O.C3.100.0%O
SS16O.C3.W.21U3
C2
SS1I.C1.0.0%0
SS2I.C1.0.0%0
SS4I.C1.0.0KD
SS5I.C1.0.0%0
SS22C.C1.0.0%0
SS18A.C1,0.0%0
SS11O.C1.0.0%O
SS13O.C1.0.0%O
SS16O.C1.0.0%0
SS3).C2.100.0%O
SS5).C2.0.0%O
SS20C.C2.10S.O%O
SS22C.C2.0.0%D
SS24C.C2,0.0%D
ssioo.ca,ioo.6%o
SS11O.C2.0.0%O
SS13O.C2.0.0NO
SS1flO.C2.0.0%O
SS1I,C3.0.0%0
ssa.C3,o.o%o
SSSI.C3.0.0%0
SS18A,C3,0.0%D
SS22A.C3.0.0%O
SS11O.C3.0.0%O
SS13O.C3.0.0%O
SS15O.C3.0.0%0
ssieo.C3.o.o%o
Figure A3-6. Partitioning of beryllium, cadmium, and carbon.
A3-22
-------
COPPER
PROFILE (%)
o-. 8 S 8 8 § 8 I
CHROMIUM
PROFILE (14)
CHLORINE
PROFILE (%)
SS1I.C1,100.0%0
S82I.C1.100.0140
SS4|.C1.100.0%O
SS5I.C1.0.014D
SS18C.C 1.100.0140
ss22C.ci.ioo.o%D
SS11O.C1.100.014O
SS13O.C1.100.014D
ssiGO.ci,ioo.oi4O
SS3I.C2.100.014O
SS4I.C2.100.014O
3S5I.C2.0.014D
SS24C.C2,100.0%D
SS20A,C2,100.0%O I
SS22A.C2,100.0%O |
SS10O.C2,100.0%O [^•flBBHI
-j j| I I
SS11O,C2.100.0%0 |
SS130,C2.100.0%O
SSieD.C2.100.014O
SS1I,C3,100.0%O
SS8l,C3.100.01tO
SS4I.C3,100.0%O
SS!il.C3.100.0%O
ssiac.C3,ioo.o%o
SS22A.C3.100.01tO
SS11O.C3.100.0%O
SS13O.C3,100.0%O
SS15O.C3.100.0%O
SS16O,C3,100.0%O
SS1I.C1.27.614O
SS2I.C1.100.0140
SS4I.C1.100.014O
SS5I.C1.0.014O
SS18A.C1.100.0%O
SS22A.C1.100.014O
SS11O.C1.100.014O
SS13O.C1.100.014O
SS16O.C1.100.014O
SS3I.C2.100.0140
SS4I.C2.100.014O
SS5I.C2.0.014O
SS24C.C2.99.214O
SS20A.C2.100.0140
SS22A.C2.100.0140
SS10O.C2.100.014O
SS11O.C2.100.014O
SS13O.C2,10a014O
SS16O.C2.100.014O
SS1I.C3.94.414O
SS2I.C3.100.014O
SS4I.C3.100.0140 I III
SSSI.C3.0.014O
SS18C.C3,100.014O
SS22A.C3.100.0140
SS11O.C3.100.014D
SS13O.C3.0.014O
SS1SO.C3.10aO%O
SS16O.C3.100.014O
III
SS1I.C1.100.0140
SS2I.C1.100.0140
SS2 SPIKEI.C1.100.0%0
SS4I.C1.100.014O
SS5I.C1.NA
SS18A.C1.100.014O
SS22A.C1.100.0140
SS11O.C1.100.014O
SS13O.C1.100.014O
SS16O.C1.0.014O
ss3i,ca.ioo.o%o
SS3 SPIKEI.C2.100.014O
SS4I.C2.100.0140
SSSI.C2.NA
SS22A.C2.100.014O
SS24A.C2.100.0140
SS10O.C2.100.0140
SS11O.C2.100.0140
SS13O.C2.100.0140
SS16O.C2.0.0140
SS1I.C3.100.0140
SS2I.C3.100.0140
SS2 SPIKE1.C3.100.014O
SS4I.C3,100.0%O
SSSI.C3.100.014O
SS18A.C3.100.014O
SS22A.C3.100.014O
SS11O.C3.100.014O
SS13O.C3.100.014O
SS1SO.C3.100.014O
SS16O,C3,66.1%0
C1
C2
C3
Figure A3-7. Partitioning of chlorine, chromium, and copper.
A3-23
-------
MANGANESE
PROFILE (S)
^ .* ^ ««.« i
ocSooOooooo)
LEAD
j PROFILE (S)
*>S 8 S 8 § I S 1
HYDROGEN
PROFILE (*.)
s s i
SS1I.C1.94.BSD
SS2I.C1.0.0SD
SS4I.C1.100.0SO
SSSI.C1.0.0KD
SS22C.C1.100.0SO
SS18A.C1.100.0SO
SS11O.C1.100.0SO
SS13O.C1,100.0%0
ssieo.ci.ioao%o
SS3I.C2.100.0%0
s&«i.c2.ioao%o
SS5I.C2.0:0%D
SS24C.C2.100.0W)
SS20A,C2.100.0%O
SS22A.C2.100,0%O
SS100.C2.100.0%0
SS110.C2.100.0%0
SS13O.C2.100.0%0
SS16O.C2.100.0%0
SS1I.C3.100.0%0
SS2I.C3,0.0%0
SS4I.C3.100.0%0
SS5I.C3.0.0140
SS18C.C3,100.0%0
SS22A,C3.100.0%O
SS110.C3.iOO.O%O
SS13O.C3.100.0%O
SS15O.C3.100.ffKO
SS16O.C3,100.0%O
SS1I.C1.52J%O
SS2I.C1.100.0%O
SS4I.C1.0.0%0
SSSI.C1.0.0%0
SS22C.C1.100.0%O
SS18A.C1.100.0%0
SS11O.C1.100.0NO
SS13O.C1.100.0SO
SS16O.C1.100.0%O
SS3I,C2,100.0%O
SS4I.C2.0.0%0
SS51.C2.0.0%0
SS20C.C2.100.0KO
SS24C.Ca,37.2%0
SS22A.C2.100.0%0
SS100.C2.100.0%O
SS11O.C2.100.0%O
SS130.C2,100.0%0
SS16O.C2.100.0%O
SS1I.C3,8«.6%0
SS2I.C3.100.0SO
SS4I.C3.0.0%O
SS5I.C3.0.0SO
SS18C.C3.100.0SO
SS22A.C3.100.0SO
SS11O.C3.100.0SO
SS13O.C3.0.0SO
SS1SO.C3.100.0%O
SS16O.C3.100.0SO
SS1I.C1.100.0SO
SS2I.C1.100.0%0
SS4I.C1.100.0SO
SS5I.C1.NA
S8«.C1.100.0%O
SS7t.C1.100.OSO
SS22C.C1.100.0SO
SS18A.C1.NA
SS12O.C1.100.0SO
SS13O.C1.100.0SO
SS1GO.C1.100.0SO
SS1I.C2.100.0SO
SS3I.C2.100.0SO
SS4I.C2.100.0SO
SSSI.C2.NA
SS«I.C2.100.0SO
SS7I.C2,100.0%O
SS22C.C2.100.0SO
SS24C.C2.100.0SO
SS10O.C2.100.0SO
SS120.C2.100.0SO
SS13O.C2.100.0SO
SS16O.C2.100.0SO
SS1I.C3.100.0SO
SS2I.C3.100.0SO
SS4I.C3.100.0SO
SSSI.C3.100.0SO
ssei.C3.ioo.oso
SS71,C3,100.0SO
SS18A.C3.NA
SS22A.C3.100.0SO
SS12O.C3.100.0SO
SS13O.C3.100.0SO
SS16O.C3,100.0%O
C1
C2
C3
Figure A3-8. Partitioning of hydrogen, toad, and manganese.
A3-24
-------
OXYGEN
PROFILE (*)
8 S S S S S
•4"
SSI I.C1,100.0*0
SS2I.C1-.100.0%O
SS4I.C1.100.0%O
SS5I.C1.NA
SS9I.C1.100.0%O
SS22C.C1.100.0%O
SS18A.C1.NA
S812O.C1.100.0%O
S813O.C1,100.0%O
SS1GO.C1.100.0%O
SS1I.C2.100.0%O
SS3I.C2.100.0%O
SS4I,C2.100.0%O
SS5I.C2.NA
3S9I.C2.100.0%O
SS22C.C2,100.0%D
SS24C.C2.100.0%O
SS10O,C2.100.0*D
SS12O.C2.100.0%0
SS130.C2,100.0%0
SS16O.C2,100.0%O
SS1I.C3.100.0%O
SS2I.C3.100.0%O
SS4I.C3,100.0%0
SSSI.C3.100.0%0
ss9).caioo.o%o
SS18A.C3.NA
SS22A,C3.100.0%O
SS12O.C3.100.0%0
SS13O.C3.100.0%0
SS16O.C3,100.0%0
C1
C2
NICKEL
PROFILE (%)
MAa9OtO^OO(
oooooScSoooi
MERCURY
PROFILE (%)
SS1I.C1.0.0%O
SS2I.C1,100.0%O
SS4I.C1.100.0%O
SSSI.C1.0.0%O
SS13A.C1.0.0%0
SS22A.C1.100.0%O
SS11O.C1,100.0%0
SS13O.C1.100.0%O
SS16O.C1.100.0%O
SS3I.C2.100.0%O
SS4I.C2.100.0%0
SS5I.C2,0.0%D
SS22C.C2.1pO.O%O
SS20A,C2,100.0%O
SS24A,C2.9e.4%0
SS10O.C2.100.0%O
SS11O.C2.100.0%O
SS13O.C2,100.0%O
SS16O,C2.100.0%O
SS1I,C3,87.0%O
ss2i.caioo.oso
SS4I.C3.100.0%0
sssi.cao.0%0
SS18C,C3.100.0%O
SS22A.C3,100.0%O
SS110.C3,100.0%O
SS13O.C3,100.0%0
SS15O,C3,100.0%O
SS16O,C3.100.0%0
SS1I.C1.0.0%0
SS2I.C1.0.0%0
SS4I.C1.0.0%6
SS5I.C1.0.0%0
SS22C.C1.100.0%O
SS18A.C1,100.0%O
SS11O,C1.0.0%O
SS13O.C1.0.0SO
SS16O.C1.38.9%O
SS4I.C2.0.0%O
SS5!.C2,0.0%0
SS22C,C2.100.0%O
SS24C.C2.100.0%O
SS20A,C2.0.0%O
SS10O,C2,S7.6%O
SS11O.C2.0.0%O
SS13O,C2,100.0%O
SS16O,C2,O.ONO
SS1I.C3.67.4%O
SS2I.C3,100.0%O
SS41,C3.aO%O
SS5I.C3,0.0%O
SS18A,C3,10aO%O
SS22A.C3.100.0XO
SS11O.C3.0.0%O
SS13O.C3,0.0%0
SS150.C3.100.0%0
SS16O,C3,69.7%0
99.5
C 1
1139
Figure A3-9. Partitioning of mercury, nickel, and oxygen.
A3-25
-------
SILVER
PROFILE (%)
SELENIUM
PROFILE 0"4)
IM * 9 Q» O M S
oooooSoo
PHOSPHORUS
PROFILE (%)
SS1I.C1.0.0%0
SS2I.C1.0.0%D
SS4I.C1.0.0%D
SS5(,C1.0.0%0
SS22C,C1.0.0%O
SS18A.C1.0,0X0
SS11O.C1.0.0%0
SS13O.C1.0.0%O
SS16O.C1.0.0%O
SS3I,C2,0,0%0
SS4I.C2.0.0%0
SS5).C2.0.0SD
SS22C.C2,0.0%O
SSZ4C.C2,0.0%0
SS20A.C2.0.0%O
SS10O.C2.0.0%O
SS11O.C2.0.0%O
SS13O,C2,0.0%0
SS16O.C2.0.0%O
SS1i.C3.0.0%0
SS2I,C3.0.0%D
SS4I.C3,0,0%D
SSSI.C3,0.0%D
SS18A,C3,0.0%O
SS22A.C3.0.0%0
SS11O.C3,O.OT4Q
SS13O.C3.0.0%O
SS1SO.C3.0.0%0
SS16O.C3.0.0KO
c:
SS1I,C1,0.0%0
SS2I,C1.0.0%0
SS4I,C1.0.0%0
SSSI.C1.0.0%0
SS22C.C1,0.0%O
SS18A.C1.0.0%O
SS11O.C1.0.0%O
SS13O.C1,0.0%O
SS160.C1.0.«rj3
SS3I.C2.0.0%0
SS4I,C3.0.0%O
• SS5I.C2.0.0%O
SS22C.C2.0.0%O
SS24C.C2.0.0%0
SS20A.C2.0.0%O
SS10O.C2.0.0%O
SS11O,C2,0.0%O
SS13O.C2.0.0%O
SS16O.C2,0.0%O
SStl.C3,0.0%O
SS4I,C3,0.0%O
SS5I.C3.0.0%O
SS18A,C3,0.014O
SS22A,C3.0.(nU)
SS11O.C3,O.Oirj3
SS13O,C3,0.0%0
SS15O,C3,0.01fJ3
SS16O,C3.0.0%O
SS1I.C1.100.0%D
SS2I.C1,100.0%0
SS4I,C1.0.0%0
SSSI.C1.0.0%0
SS18A.C1.100.OrHO
SS22A.C1.100.0%O
SS11O,C1,100.0%0
SS13O.C1.0.0%0
SS16O.C1,100.0%0
SS3I,C2.100,0%D
ss4i.ca.o.o%o
SSSI.CZO.0%0
SS20C.C2.100.0%O
SS24C.C2,100.0XO
SS22A.C2,99.r%O
SS10O,C2,100.0%0
SS11O.C2.100.0%O
SS13O.C2.0.0%0
SS160,C2,0.0%O
SS1I,C3,100.0%O
SS2I.C3,100.0%O
SS4I,C3,0.0%D
SS5I,C3,O.S%O
ssiac,C3.ioo.o%o
SS22A.C3,100.CT)iO JU
Tl
SS11O,C3,100.0%O
SS13O.C3.0.0%O
SS15O.C3.100.0-4O
ssieo.C3,ioo.o%o
Figure A3-10. Partitioning of phosphorous, selenium, and silver.
A3-26
-------
TIN
" PROFILE (%)
o 85 S S S §
THALLIUM
PROFILE (%)
SULFUR
PROFILE (%)
SS1I.C1,0.0%0
SS2I.C1.0.Q%0
SS4I,C1.0.0%0
SS5I.C1.0.0%O
SS22C.C1.0.0%0
SS18A.C1,0.0%O
8S11O.C1.100.0V)
SS13O.C1.0.0%O
SS16O.C1.0.0%0
SS3I,C2.100.0%D
ss4i.c2.ao%o
SSSI,C2.0.0*D
SS24C.C2,100.0%0
SS22A,C2,100.0%O
SS10O,C2,100.0%O
SS13O.C2.100.0%O
SS160,C2.52.2%0
SS1I.C3.0.0%0
SS2I,C3,100.0%O
SS4I.C3,0.0%0
SSSI,C3.0.0%O
SS18A.C3.0.0%O
SS22A.C3,100.0%0
SS11O.C3,100.0%O
SS130,C3,0.0%O
SS1SO,C3.0.0%O
S;S16O.C3,28.4%O
Ct
CS
SS1I.C1,0.0%D
SS2I.C1.0.0%0
SS4I.C1.0.0*0
SSSI,C1.0.0%0
SS22C,C1.0.0%O
SS18A.C1.0.0%O
SS11O,C1.100.0%D
SS13O.C1.0.0%O
SS16O,C1.0.0%0
SS3I.C2.88.3%0
SS4I,C2,0.0%0
SSSI,C2.0.0%0
SS22C,C2,0.0%O
SS24C.C2.0.0%O
SS20A.C2.0.0XO
SS10O.C2.83.6*O
SS11O,C2.100.0%O
SS13O.C2.0.0%0
SS16O.C2.0.0%O
SS1I,C3.0.0%0
SS2!.C3.0.0%D
SS4I.C3,0.mO
SS5I.C3.0.0%O
SS18A.C3.0.CT4O
SS22A.CaiOO.O%0
SS11O.C3.100.0%O
SS13O.C3,0.0%O
SS15O.C3,0.0%O
SS16O.C3,0.0%0
C2
SS1I.C1,100.0%O
SS2I.C1,100.0%O
SS4I,C1.100.0%O
SS5I.C1.NA
SS18A.C1.100.0%O
SS22A.C1,100.0%O
SS11O.C1.0.0%O
SS13O,C1.100.0%O
SS16O.C1.100.0NO
SS3I.C2.100.0%O
SS4I.C2,100.0%O
SS5I.C2.NA
SS22A,CZ100.0%0
SS24A.C2,100.0%O
SS100.C2.0.0%0
SS11O.C2.0.0%O
SS13O,C2.100.0%0
SS16O.C2,100.0%O
SS1I,C3,100.0%O
SS2I.C3,100.0%O
SS«.C3.100.0%O
SS5I.C3.100.0%O
SS18A.C3.100.0%b
SS22A,C3,100.0%O
ssno,cao.o%o
SS13O.C3.100.0%O
SS15O.C3.100.0%6
SS16O.C3,100.0%O
Figure A3-11. Partitioning of sulfur, thallium, and tin.
A3-27
-------
• ZINC
% OF TOTAL INPUT
ssii.ci.ioo.o%o ;
SS2I,C1,100.0%0
SS4I.C1.100.0%0
SS5I.C1.0.0%0
SS18A,C1,100.0%D
SS22A,C1.100.0%0
SS11O,C1,100.0%0
SS13O,C1.100.0%0
SS16O.C1.100.0%0
ss3i.ca.ioo.o%o
SS4I,C2.100.0%0
sssi.ca,o.o%o
ss2oc.ca,ioo.o%o
SS24C.C2.100.0%O
SS22A,C2.100.0%0
SS10O.C2,100.0%0
SSt1O,C2.100.Q%0
SS13O.C2,100.0%0
SS16O,C2,100.0%0
SS1l,C3.tOO.O%0
ssai.C3,ioo.o%o
SS4J.C3.100.0%D
ssa,C3,ioo.o%o
SS18A.C3,100.0%0
SS22A,C3,100.0%0
SS11O,C3.100.0%O
SS13O.C3.100.0%0
SS15O.C3.100.0%O
SS16O.C3,100.0%O
C2
Figure A3-12. Partitioning of zinc.
A3-28
-------
APPENDIX 4
INTERNAL QUALITY ASSURANCE
The measurements in this Demonstration were performed according to a Category II Quality
Assurance Project Plan. This appendix presents detailed results of internal QA/QC activities performed
during the Demonstration. These activities were quite comprehensive in scope to document and quantify
the quality of critical measurements for each sample stream. A summary of the quality assurance samples
and impact on the test results is provided below. This is followed by a detailed listing of QA/QC results
for each measurement and matrix. At the end of this appendix, equipment calibration information is
provided.
QA SAMPLES
Included in this demonstration were collection and analysis of field QA samples such as
* Reagent blanks - samples of all reagents (filters, chemicals, etc.) used in the field taken directly'
from the original containers. This provides a check for contamination introduced by the raw
reagents used to charge sampling equipment and recover samples;
® Proof blanks - samples from flue gas sampling equipment obtained by charging and recovering
the trains in the field lab, after cleaning but before collecting any field samples. This checks for
; contamination due to inadequate pre-test cleaning and/or recovery procedures;
» Recovery blanks - samples of reagents and reagent mixtures used to recover samples from the
sampling equipment, taken from the containers (squeeze bottles, etc.) used for recovery. This
checks for contamination introduced during sample recovery;
» Field blanks - samples which were exposed to all of the field sampling and recovery procedures
except for actual collection of samples. For gas sampling methods, this consisted of setup of
the equipment at the sampling location including a leak check, then recovery of the train using the
A4-1
-------
same procedures as a sample. This provides an overall check of the field preparation, sampling,
and recovery procedures for contamination;
• Trip blanks - sample reagents that were prepared in the laboratory and sent to the field with
reagents used to collect samples, stored in the same location as field reagents during the test
program, then sent back to laboratory with the field samples and analyzed. This checks for
contamination introduced during sample shipping and storage.
• Field spikes - known quantities of a target analyte which were introduced to the sampling
equipment then recovered and analyzed to determine the total recovery of the spike. This
provides a measure of overall measurement accuracy;
• Reid duplicates - duplicate samples obtained from the same location at the same time (usually
by dividing a larger sample) and submitted Jo the laboratory for the same analytical procedure.
This provides a measure of overall measurement precision.
Additional QA procedures performed in the laboratory included:
• Method blanks - samples of clean reagents introduced to the analyzer to check for bias or
contamination in the analytical procedure;
• Duplicate analysis - duplicate injection of a* sample into the analyzer to provide a measure of
analytical precision;
• Laboratory control spikes/duplicates • a known quantity of the target analyte added to a clean
sample matrix to provide a measure the analytical accuracy in the absence of interferences from
the field sample matrix. The spike is repeated to determine precision;
• Surrogate additions - a known quantity of substances similar to but distinguishable from the target
analytes added to the sample reagents (e.g., XAD-2 and Tenax sorbent resins) before sampling.
The amount of the surrogate compounds recovered indicates the magnitude of potential bias
introduced during sampling and laboratory analysis procedures;
• Internal/alternate standard additions - a known quantity of substances similar to but distinguishable
from the target analytes added to the samples in the laboratory before sample preparation. The
A4-2
-------
amount of sample recovered indicates the magnitude of potential bias introduced during
laboratory preparation and analysis procedures;
e Method performance checks - known laboratory standards introduced to the analyzer to d
-------
DETAILED QA/QC RESULTS
Boiler Fluo Gaa
In general, the data collected at the boiler stack (SS16) are considered to be of very high quality and
satisfied all of the critical Demonstration project objectives. For those samples which were collected
isokinetically, Figure A4-1 presents the isokinetic rate achieved for each test compared to th© method
criterion of 90-110 percent. All results were within the acceptance limits. Figure A4-2 presents the
moisture content of the flue gas determined from each of the sample trains, showing excellent
comparability of the results obtained with different sample trains. In addition to those QA/QC samples
specified in the methods, other QA/QC samples such as proof blanks and duplicates analysis were
processed. The following section presents and discusses results from all of these samples.
Somivolatilo Organic Compounds
Glassware proof and field blank results for the semivolatile organic sampling train are shown in Table
A4-3. Overall, the results from the field and proof blanks are considered excellent. Proof blank samples
were obtained for every set of SVOC glassware. One proof blank was analyzed for PCBs,
PCDD/PCDF, PAH, and CB/CP under this Demonstration project. PCB congeners were not detected at
levels significantly above the detection limit in either the proof blank or the field blank and these results
are considered acceptable. Proof blanks and field blanks were free from significant levels of dioxins and
furans. Octachlorinated dioxins were detected in the proof blank; this is a known artifact of the analysis
and should be disregarded. PAH compounds also were not detected in any of the samples, except
naphthalene was detected in the field blank. Naphthalene is a known XAD-2 contaminant and the results
should not be considered significant, except that naphthalene results should be considered only as
estimates. Although U.S. EPA test methods were used for this Demonstration, the remaining proof
blanks were analyzed by ELI for PCBs and PCDD/PCDF to satisfy the QA requirements of Environment
Canada test methods. The results, reported separately by ELI, indicated concentrations of PCBs,
dioxins, and furans were below the maximum allowable concentrations of the Environment Canada test
methods. Results for SVOC method blanks are given in Table A4-4 for every test run. No significant
concentrations of PCBs, PCDD/PCDF, PAH, CB, or CP were found in the method blanks, with any
detected levels only slightly above the detection limits (except for octachlorinated dioxins and
naphthalene, which are artifacts as noted above). These results indicate the SVOC results are free from
significant contamination problems.
A4-4
-------
Surrogate, internal standard, and alternate standard recoveries are shown in Tables A4-5, Table A4-6,
and Table A4-7, respectively. Most of the recoveries were within the criteria specified in the test
methods and therefore these results are considered very good. The occasional result which falls outside
of the method criteria is not considered significant. Results for the laboratory control spikes and
laboratory control spike duplicates are given in Table A4-8. These results were used to calculate the
accuracy and precision for the flue gas SVOC measurements, which satisfied all of the quality assurance
objectives. A duplicate analysis was performed on one of the sampling trains, and results are given in
Table A4-9. The concentrations of SVOCs were too low to in this duplicate sample (near or below the
detection limits) to permit reliable determination of precision, except for PCDD/PCDF. The precision of
PCDD/PCDF calculated using this duplicate analysis also satisfied the quality assurance objectives. These
results demonstrated that the accuracy, precision, and overall quality of the key SVOC results - PCB,
PCDD, and PCDF - were adequate to demonstrate all of the project objectives.
Volatile Organic Compounds-
Results for the VOST field and trip blanks, given in Table A4-10 and Table A4-11, were excellent
since all results were below the detection .limits (except two spurious results which were detected but
below the quantitation limit). VOST surrogate recoveries for Conditions 2 and 3 are shown in Table A4-
12. These recoveries are excellent with only an occasional result falling outside the control limits. During
Condition 1, the Tenax sorbent traps inadvertently were not spiked with surrogates before sampling. It
became very apparent, however, that this was not the case, and surrogates had to be spiked after
sampling but before analysis. Although this does cloud the VOST data for Condition 1, identical
sampling and analytical procedures were used during the other two conditions and most recoveries were
acceptable for these tests. Recovery of laboratory control spikes for the VOST samples also was
generally excellent, as seen in Table A4-13.
Results of the EPA audit sample analysis are compared to the true values in Table A4-14. The audit
consisted of a cylinder with the known concentrations of gas sampled through the entire VOST train. It
should be noted that this result is a check of the entire sampling system. Results for the audit were well
within the program objective, except for the vinyl chloride. Based on these results, the quality of the
VOC measurements was sufficient to satisfy all of the project objectives. Vinyl chloride results may be
biased high.
Metals-
Proof blank and field blank results for trace metals are summarized in Table A4-15. The proof blank
showed clean glassware for all metals except copper, manganese and mercury. The levels of copper
A4-5
-------
and manganese were very close to the detection limit and were not considered significant. Two additional
proofs were prepared and still resulted in significant detections of mercury. Upon further investigation,
the detection of mercury was found to be due to an interference from the HCI rinse of the train. The HCI
rinse of the permanganate impingers had not been purged with nitrogen prior to analysis, resulting in
interference and false detections. Corrective action was implemented and additional proofs were
supplied to both the main laboratory for the Demonstration (Twin Cities Testing) and to a second
laboratory (Calscience Environmental Laboratories Inc.) for comparative purposes. These final proof
blank analyses showed acceptable results.
The multiple metals train field blank did indicate contamination of some trace metals at generally very
low levels (2 to 15 jig, except for tin at 74 ug). Table A4-16 compares the field blank levels to the levels
detected in the field samples in both absolute terms and as a percentage of the field samples. This
shows that the contamination levels were comparable in most cases to the levels measured in the field
samples. Most of the contamination was present in the front half of the train. Since the glassware proof
was clean, the contamination was most likely located in the filter. Levels of antimony, barium, chromium,
copper, lead, phosphorus, silver, tin, and zinc were present in the field blank sample. Since the
absolute levels of most trace metals measured in the flue gas were very low and had little contribution to
overall trace metals mass balances, the suspected contamination does not adversely impact the
achievement of the project objectives. However, trace metals emissions data may overly conservative
due to the potential high bias in the results. !
One sample train was analyzed in duplicate. Results of these analyses are given in Table A4-17.
Based on these results, the precision of the trace metals measured above the detection limits in both
analyses was very good.
[
Hydrogen Chloride—
QA sample results for the HCI sample train are given in Table A4-18. The glassware proof
demonstrated glassware cleanliness, and both the high level and the low level EPA audit sample results
satisfied the acceptance criteria. To quantify capture 'efficiency of the first versus the second impinger and
hence the potential for breakthrough of HCI, the first and second impinger of one sample train was
analyzed separately; however, concentration of chloride in both portions was below detection limits so
that the capture efficiency could not be determined. HCI was not detected in the field blanks. Field
duplicates were prepared by combining the two impingers of a sample train then splitting the combined
sample for separate analysis. This was done for two samples. The results for th© Condition 1 samples
were below detection limits and could not be used; however, results for the Condition 3 sample were
A4-6
-------
above the detection, limits and the relative percent difference for the field duplicate was 4.4 percent -
well within the acceptance criteria for the Demonstration. These results indicate the quality of the HCI
emission measurements is sufficient to satisfy all the project objectives.
Continuous Emission Monitoring—
Stratification of NOx and O2 concentrations at the boiler stack is shown in Table A4-19. The maximum
deviation at one traverse point from the average concentration was 3.18 percent, well below the criterion
of 10 percent. A response time check performed on all of the analyzers showed good response times
except for SO2. Due to the low range (0-100 ppm) and the low levels of SO2 in the flue gas, this is not
considered significant. Since the stack was under negative pressure, a check for dilution due to in-leakage
through the various sets of ports was performed. The results given in Table A4-21 indicate that some in-
lealcage was present. This was accounted for in .the data reduction. A cyclonic flow check was performed
on the stack. Results of this check are given in Table A4-22. The average swirl angle was 5 degrees, well
within the method criterion of 10 degrees.
Figures A4-3, A4-4, and A4-5 present the results of daily span drift/zero drift, and bias checks
performed on the continuous emissions monitoring system. The results were within the acceptance limits
for all tests except for Condition 1 Run 2, where drift for the NOx and SCfe analyzers exceeded the limit
slightly Data were corrected for drift for this run with no significant change to the uncertainty of the
measurements.
Process Gas Streams
In addition to the boiler flue gas, samples of several process gas streams were collected. Since the
data from these locations were used for engineering evaluation purposes, quality assurance objectives
were not specified. Results of QA/QC sample analysis are compared to quality assurance objectives for
boiler flue gas for reference only. Sampling procedures at these locations were based upon the
standard reference method procedures, with modifications to accommodate conditions such as high
pressure, high temperature, and hydrogen-rich atmospheres. It should be noted that some of these
samples contained very high in levels of native organics. For example, naphthalene loading in samples
of the TDU off-gas (SS19) was on the order of milligrams. These high levels caused a number of
analytical problems ranging from instrument saturation, failed internal standards, analyte masking, and
precipitates forming in the sample extracts. There were a number of problems associated with all of the
process gas samples except for the combustion air samples. Since these results were used only to
A4-7
-------
facilitate an engineering evaluation of system performance, the achievement of the primary objectives of
the Demonstration was not adversely affected by these results.
Semivolatlle Organic Compounds—
Internal standard recoveries, alternate standard recoveries, and surrogate recoveries for process gas
samples are provided in Tables A4-23 through A4-28. Results for propane (SS6), hydrogen (SS7), and
combustion air (SS9) were generally within method criteria. Most of the difficulties were experienced with
samples of reformed gas (SS14) and TDU off-gas (SS19) because of the high levels of native analytes in
these samples. Despite these problems, more than three-fourths of the SVOC standard recoveries for
the reformed gas and TDU off-gas samples were near or within the quality assurance objectives, with
recoveries generally on the low side rather than high. Thus, these data are suitable for the engineering
purposes for which they are intended.
Volatile Organic Compounds— ;
Surrogate recoveries for the process gas VOST samples are provided in Table A4-29. Results for
propane (SS6), hydrogen (SS7), and combustion air (SS9) were generally within method criteria. It
should be noted that sampling of propane (SS6) was conducted using a Tedlar bag rather than with a
modified VOST set-up since the propane was expected to interfere with the collection of VOCs on the
Tenax resin. As with the SVOCs, most of the difficulties were experienced with samples of reformed
gas (SS14) and TDU off-gas (SS19) due to the high levels of native analytes in these samples. Where
matrix interferences did not prevent quantification of surrogate compounds, slightly more than 60 percent
of the recoveries for reformed gas and TDU off-gas were near or within the quality assurance objectives
for boiler flue gas. The recoveries for Condition 2 were significantly better than for Conditions 1 and 3.
The VOC data for samples of reformed gas collected during Conditions 1 and 3 may be questionable.
Fixed Gases—
An audit sample was provided by EPA for process gas fixed gases analysis. The results of the audit
sample analysis are compared to the true value in Table A4-30. Oxygen and carbon monoxide
concentrations were within ±10 percent (considered acceptable), but the result for carbon dioxkie was
not. The results indicate that results for carbon dioxide concentration in the process gas samples may be
biased low by 5 to 15 percent. This result does not adversely impact achievement of the primary
objectives of the program, but may indicate a high bias in the calculated heating value for reformed gas of
5 to 15 percent. Characterization of the reformed gas for use as a fuel was a secondary objective.
A4-8
-------
Solid and Liquid Streams
The potential for background contamination of liquid and solid samples was significant because of the
relatively high concentrations of target analytes in some of the streams. In order to quantify background
contamination, solid and liquid field blanks were collected at the waste water sampling location (SS1) and
the treated soil sampling location (SS10). For the liquid field blank, a bottle of deionized H2O was
carried to the SS1 sample location and treated in exactly the same manner as an actual sample. The
bottle was opened to the atmosphere for the same amount of time as the SSI sample, and the blank
was spirt and composited following the normal procedure used for actual samples. At SS10, a bottle of
clean laboratory sand was treated similarly. Results for these two field blanks are given in Table A4-31
and Table A4-32. The results show that the samples were free from significant contamination and that
sampling procedures were reliable.
Duplicate samples were collected and analyzed for waste water (SS1), waste oil (SS2), contaminated
soil (SS3), and scrubber liquor (SS22). The results of these duplicates were used to calculate precision
measurements at these locations. The concentrations of each analyte detected in the samples and their
respective duplicates, the average value, and the relative percent difference are given in Tables A4-33,
A4-34, and A4-35. The relative percent difference satisfied the Demonstration objectives in most cases,
except when analytes were detected at concentrations near the method detection limits. These
exceptions are not considered significant. The chlorine content of the waste oil (Table A4-34) (did not
meet the precision objective based on the field duplicate results and the resulting uncertainty in these
numbers may be significant. However, since good chlorine mass balance closure was achieved in
Conditions 1 and 3, the duplicate result may be in error rather than the original analysis, The precision of
the PCB measurements in the contaminated soil (SS3) fell slightly outside the precision objective based
on the field duplicate results. Several other results for the contaminated soil showed similar differences.
This is most likely due to the heterogeneous nature of the soil rather than measurement error and
therefore has no adverse impact on the Demonstration results.
Polychlorinatad Biphenyls—
PCB matrix spike and matrix spike duplicate results are given in Table A4-36 and Table A4-37
presents surrogate recoveries for liquid and solid samples. The recoveries of spikes and surrogates
satisfied the objectives of the Demonstration and the test methods, except for the reactor grit (SS11)
and scrubber sludge (SS12), for which there were a number of the matrix spike results which did not
meet the criteria. The PCB content in the reactor grit sample was much greater than anticipated, therefore
the spiking level was too low to obtain accurate spike recovery results! The limited quantity of this
A4-9
-------
sample precluded repetition of the spiking tests. The scrubber sludge samples also proved to be a
difficult matrix, with high matrix spike recoveries for Condition 2 and tow matrix spike recoveries for
Condition 3. Therefore, the accuracy of the PCB measurements for these samples was based on
surrogate recovery results instead. All surrogate recoveries satisfied the method criteria. Although these
results do not affect the ORE objective for PCB, they could affect the engineering objective for DE of
PCB. Since (1) the matrix spike/matrix spike duplicate results for some of the PCB congeners met the
QA objective, (2) all surrogate recoveries were within allowable limits, and (3) levels of PCBs were
detected in other output streams besides reactor grit, the reliability of the PCB DE results is considered
adequate for engineering purposes. .
Chlorobanzenes, Chlorophenols, and Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons—
Matrix spike and matrix spike duplicate results are shown in Table A4-38 for CB, CP, and PAH in
solid and liquid samples. Surrogate recoveries are listed in Table A4-39. The results were generally
acceptable with a few exceptions. The objective for precision of ehtorophenols in waste water (SS1) and
o
heat exchanger residue (SS18) was not achieved. Ghlorophenols showed tow and van'able recoveries for
the matrix spikes that were performed on these samples. In particular, pentachtorophenol was subject
to low recoveries. Low recoveries for these acid prganfe compounds were observed in a number of
samples. This is believed to be due to the high levels of other aromatic organics (e.g., naphthalene)
and/or harsh conditions during the extraction stage of analysis. Although this increases the uncertainty of
this measurement, ehtorophenols were not a critical analyte; therefore, this does not significantly impact
conclusions related to the primary objectives of the project. The results may indicate a low bias for some
of the ehtorophenols and increased uncertainty of these measurements.
Volatile Organic Compounds—
Matrix spike and matrix spike duplicate results for the solid and liquid samples are given in Table A4-
40. High levels of benzene in a number of the samples interfered with quantifying the MS/MSD levels.
The precision achieved for PCE in the scrubber sludge (SS12) was barely outside the program
objectives. This result does not significantly impact the conclusions regarding PCE destruction since this
stream was always insignificant in the data analysis. The accuracy for VOCs at the same location was
significantly above the QA objective. This occurred due to the relatively high levels of benzene in the
samples. The high level of benzene caused instrument saturation; hence, dilution of the samples was
required to bring the benzene concentration within the range of the analytical instrument. This resulted in
dilution of other VOC compounds to such low levels that spiked compounds could not be measured with
confidence. This in turn, resulted in high recoveries for the other VOC compounds, some as high as 6,014
percent. Although this does impact the secondary project objective relative to residuals characterization
-------
to determine disposal requirements, the results indicate a probable high bias in the reported VOC
concentrations, and hence could be considered conservative. Conclusions regarding the primary project
objective for destruction efficiency of PCE are considered valid because PCE accuracy satisfied the QA
objective. VOCs in reactor grit (SS11) samples were subject to similar problems due to the high levels
of benzene.
PCDD and PCDF—
Laboratory control spikes were used to determine accuracy for the PCDD/PCDF measurements in
solid and liquid samples. Results are given in Table A4-41. All recoveries satisfied the QA objectives.
Other QA Results—
A trace metals matrix spike was performed on the scrubber liquor (SS22). Recovery of the matrix
spike satisfied the QA objectives, as shown in Table A4-42. The accuracy determined from this sample
was also applied to the scrubber decant water (SS13) since these matrices are very similar. QA results
for organic halogens in solid and liquid samples are shown in Table A4-43. Ultimate analysis QA results
are shown in Table A4-44. Total organic carbon QA results are given in Table A4-45. Additional organic
halogen, total organic carbon, ash, total sulfur, and total halogen QA results are given in Table A4-46 and
Table A4-47. Most of the results presented in these tables satisfied the QA objectives and no significant
problems are noted.
EQUIPMENT CALIBRATION
All sampling equipment was calibrated before use in the field. A post-test calibration was also
conducted on the dry gas meters. Calibration worksheets and certification sheets are given at the end of
this section in the following order:
« VOST train (Method 0030) calibrations (includes dry gas meter, thermocouples)
• HCI train (Method 26) calibrations (includes dry gas meter, thermocouples, magnahelic gauges)
• SVOC train (Method 0010) calibrations (includes dry gas meter, thermocouples, magnahelic
gauges, nozzles)
• Metals train (Method 29) calibrations (includes dry gas meter, thermocouples, magnahelic gauges,
nozzles, and pilot tubes)
A4-11
-------
Process weight calibrations (calibrations for the scales used to measure liquid and solid stream
flow rates)
Gaseous process calibration (all equipment used for SS6, SS7, SS9, SS14, and SS19)
OEM gas certifications
Additional calibrations (back-up equipment).
A4-12
-------
TABLE A4-1. QUALITY ASSURANCE SAMPLES
Measurement or Matrix
Gaseous SVOC
Measurements
(QA/QC results for SS1 6
sampling trains applied to
process gas samples also)
Metals Measurements at
SS16
Gaseous VOC
Measurements
(QA/QC results for SS1 6
sampling trains will be
applied to process gas
samples also)
QA Sample Type
Field Blank (Qty - 2)
Proof blank
Reagent Blanks
Recovery Blanks
Duplicate Analysis
Method Blank
Laboratory Control
Spike
Description
Complete train
Complete train excluding
XAD resin
Filters (lot of 3), spiked
XAD. and Dl water
Acetone, methytene
chloride, and toluene
Sample extract
Analytical blank
XAD-2 spiked with target
compounds, in the
laboratory
Analytical Frequency
1 time after 1st run
One complete train
analyzed for
Demonstration, all
other trains analyzed
by ELI
1 time if high field
blank
1 time if high field
blank
1 time (Test 2/Run 2)
1 time
1 time
Archive
Frequency
1 time after
7th run
Prior to test
and each new
lot
Prior to test
and each new
lot
_
.
Data Quality
Indkrator
__
Precision
Accuracy
Surrogate and internal standard recoveries also used for accuracy calculations.
Proof Blank
Field Blanks (Qty - 2)
Reagent Blanks
(Metals)
Reagent Blanks
(Paniculate)
Recovery Blank
Lab Matrix Spike
Duplicate Analysis
Audit Sample
(Metals)
Audit Sample (Hg)
Reid Spike
(Paniculate)
Reid Blanks (Qty - 2)
Trip Blanks (Qty - 2)
Complete Train
Complete Train
Rters(lot of 3). 5%
HNO3/10%H2O2,4%
KMnO4/10%H2SO4
Filters (lot of 3), Acetone
Acetone, 0.1 N HNO3, 8
NHCI
Digested sample
Digested Sample
1 low level and 1 high
level filter spiked all
target metals excluding
tin
Permanganate Solution
spiked with Hg
Known amount of
particulate poured into
the sample train
One pair of tubes
One pair of tubes
1 time prior to test
1 time after 2nd run
1 time if high field
blank
1 time if high field
blank
1 time if high field
blank
1 time
1 time (Test 2/Run1)
1 time prior to test
1 time prior to test
1 time
2 times, 1 for each
shipment of tubes
2 times, 1 for each
shipment of tubes
r
1 time after
7th run
Prior to test
and each new
lot
Prior to test
and each new
lot
Prior to test
and each new
lot
—
—
_
_
__
__.
Accuracy
Precision
Accuracy
Accuracy
Accuracy
__
A4-13
-------
TABLE A4-1. QUALITY ASSURANCE SAMPLES
(continued)
Measurement or Matrix
Measurements
(continued)
SS16
Fixed Gases at SS9 and
SS14
Waste Water, SS1,
SS1S
QA Sample Type
Performance
Check
Audit Sample
Prool Blank
Field Blank (Qty-
2)
Reagent Blanks
Recovery Blanks
Capture
Efficiency
Audit Sample
Duplicate
Audit Sample
Field Blank (Qty -
2)
Duplicate
Duplicate
Duplicate
Duplicate
duplicate
Duplicate
duplicate
Duplicate
Matrix Spike
Matrix Spike
Matrix Spike
Matrix Spike
Duplicate
Description
Laboratory gas
standard
caroon tetracnioride.
chloroform,
perchloroe'thylene,
vinyl chloride,
benzene
Complete Train
Complete train
0.1 NH2SO4.0.1N
NaOH
Deionized H2O
1 st and 2nd Impinger
analyzed separate
from the 3rd impinger
Liquid sample
Split 1st. 2nd, and
3rd Impinger catches
in the field
Gas canister from
EPA
Deionized H2O
Duplicate sample
collected
Duplicate sample
collected ,
Duplicate sample
collected ;
Duplicate sample
collected
Duplicate sample
collected
Duplicate sample
collected
Duplicate sample
collected
Duplicate sample
collected
For PCB's
ForCB, CP.and
PAH
ForVOC
For PCB's :
Analytical
Frequency
1 time prior to test
1 time prior to test
1 time prior to test
1 time after 2nd
run
1 time if high field
blank
1 time if high field
blank
1 time (Test
2/Run3)
1 time prior to test
1 time (Test
2/Run1)
1 time prior to test
1 time for test
condition 1
Test 1 for PCB
Analysis
Test 1 for Metals
Analysis
Test 1 for Total
Organic Carbon
Analysis
Test 2 forCB, CP
Analysis
Test 2 for Total
Sulfur Analysis
TestSforVOC
Analysis
Test 3 for
norganic
Halogen Analysis
Test 3 for Organic
Halogen Analysis
Once for the
program
Once for the
program
Once for the
program
Once for th«
program
Archive
Frequency
.. . r
_
1 time after
7th run
Prior to test
and each
new lot
Prior to test
and each
new lot
— .
_
test
condition 3
ammma
ommma
,,,_„
n nan ID
_
_JLU--II
_
-1 , 1_ j !_
Data Quality
Indicator
Accuracy
Accuracy
.™_
Accuracy
Precision
Accuracy
a J ILJJ
Precision,
PCB
Precision,
Metals
Precision,
TOG
Precision,
CB. CP
Precision,
Total Sulfur
Precision,
voc
Precision,
Inorganic
Halogens
Precision,
Organic
Halogens
Accuracy,
PCB
CB, CP,
PAH
Accuracy,
VOC
Analytical
Precision,
PCB
A4-14
-------
TABLE A4-1. QUALITY ASSURANCE SAMPLES
(continued)
Measurement or Matrix
Waste Water, SS1,
SS18 (continued)
Decant Water, SSI 3
Scrubber Liquor, SS22
Quench Water, SS24
Waste Oil, SS2
QA Sample Type
Matrix Spike
Duplicate
Matrix Spike
Duplicate
Audit Sample
Audit Sample
Audit Sample
Matrix Spike
Matrix Spike
Matrix Spike
Matrix Spike
Duplicate
Matrix Spike
Duplicate
Matrix Spike
Duplicate
Matrix Spike
Matrix Spike
Matrix Spike
Matrix Spike
Duplicate
Matrix Spike
Duplicate
Matrix Spike
Duplicate
Matrix Spike
Matrix Spike
rfatrix Spike
Matrix Spike
Duplicate
Matrix Spike
Duplicate
Matrix Spike
Duplicate
Duplicate
Duplicate
Description
For CB, CP, and
PAH
For VOC
Spiked for Total
Sulfur analysis
Spiked for Total
Inorganic Halogen
analysis
Spiked for Total
Organic Carbon
analysis
ForPCB's
For CB, CP. and
PAH
For VOC
For PCB's
For CB, CP, and
PAH
For VOC
For PCB's
For CB, CP, and
PAH
For VOC
For PCB's
For C8, CP, and
PAH
For VOC
For PCB's
For CB, CP, and
PAH
For VOC
For PCB's
For CB, CP, and
PAH
For VOC
Duplicate sample
collected
Duplicate sample
collected
Analytical
Frequency
Once for the
program
Once for the
program
1 time prior to test
1 time prior to test
1 time prior to test
Once for each
test condition
Once for each
test condition
Once for each
test condition
Once for each
test condition
Once.for each
test condition
Once for each
test condition
Once for each
test condition
Once for each
test condition
Once for each
test condition
Once for each
test condition
Once for each
test condition
Once for each
test condition
Once for each
test condition
Once for each
test condition
Once for each
test condition
Once for each
test condition
Once for each
test condition
Once for each
test condition
Test 1 for CB, CP
Analysis
Test 1 for Metals
Analysis
Archive
Frequency
.,-,„
,„„
„_,!,,,
*J"" e
„.„
.„„
_ .
_ , i ±
- _ r L v
—
••«« r
-_•- T
_
, ,
. . A'
. . . _
_
__
Data Quality
Indicator
Precision,
CB. CP.
PAH
Analytical
Precision.
VOC
Accuracy,
Total Sulfur
Accuracy,
Inorganic
Halogens
Total
Organic
Carbon
Accuracy,
PCS
CB, CP,
PAH
Accuracy,
VOC
Precision,
PCB
CB, CP.
PAH
Precision,
VOC
Accuracy,
PCB
CB, CP,
PAH
Accuracy,
VOC
Precision,
PCB
CB, CP.
PAH
Precision,
VOC
Accuracy,
PCB
CB. CP,
PAH
Accuracy,
VOC
Precision,
PCB
CB, CP.
PAH
Precision,
VOC
Precision,
CB.CP
Precision,
Metals
A4-15
-------
TABLE A4-1. QUALITY ASSURANCE SAMPLES
(continued)
Measurement or Matrix
Waste Oil. SS2
(continued)
Sdl, SS3, SS10
QA Sample Type
Duplicate
Duplicate
Duplicate
Duplicate
Duplicate
Matrix Spike
Matrix Spike
Matrix Spike
Matrix Spike
Duplicate
Matrix Spike
Duplicate
Matrix Spike
Duplicate
Field BlanK
Duplicate
Duplicate
Duplicate
Duplicate
Duplicate
Duplicate
Duplicate
Matrix Spike
Matrix Spike
Matrix Spike
Matrix Spike
Duplicate
Matrix Spike
Duplicate
Description
Duplicate sample
collected
Duplicate sample
collected
Duplicate sample
collected
Duplicate sample
collected
Duplicate sample
collected!
For PCB's
For CB, CP, and
PAH
ForVOC
For PCB's
For CB. CP, and
PAH
ForVOC
Sand
Duplicate sample
collected
Duplicate sample
collected
Duplicate sample
collected
Duplicate sample
collected
Duplicate sample
collected
Duplicate sample
collected
Duplicate sample
collected
For PCB's
For CB. CP. and
PAH
ForVOC
For PCB's
For CB. CP. and
PAH
Analytical
Frequency
Test 1 for Total
Sulfur Analysis
Test 3 for PCS
Analysis
Halogens
Analysis
Test 3 for VOC
Analysis
Test 3 for
Ultimate Analysis
Once for the
program
Once for the
program
Once for the
program
Once for die
program
•
Once for toe
program
Once for the
program
1 time for Test 3
Test a for CB, CP
Analysis
Test 2 for Metals
Analysis
Test 2 for Total
Sulfur Analysis
Test 2 for PCS
Analysis
Halogens
Analysis
Test 2 for VOC
Analysis
Test 2 for
Ultimate Analysis
Once for the test
condrtion2
Once for the test
condition 2
Once for the test
condition 2
Once for the test
condition 2
Once for the test
eondraon2
Archive
Frequency
. , r -
«M«
.nm.
««.
- - , - -
-
™
, TL,,
T L1,
L ,__„
1 - 1 - -
- 1
.ml.,..
- r . ^
,, | ,
Data Quality
Indicator
Precision,
Total Sulfur
Precision,
PCS
Total
Halogens
Precision,
VOC
Precision,
Ultimate
Accuracy,
PCB
CB, CP,
PAH
Accuracy,
VOC
Analytical
Precision,
PCB
Precision,
CB, CP,
PAH
Analytical
Precision,
VOC
__
Precision,
CB.CP
Precision,
Metals
Precision,
Total Sulfur
Precision,
PCB
Total
Halogens
Precision,
VOC
Precision,
Ultimate
Accuracy,
PCB
CB, CP.
PAH
Accuracy,
VOC
Analytical
Precision,
PCB
Precision,
CB, CP.
PAH
A4-16
-------
TABLE A4-1. QUALITY ASSURANCE SAMPLES
(continued)
Measurement or Matrix
Soil, SS3. SS10
(continued)
Reactor grit, SS11
Scrubber sludge. SS12
QA Sample Type
Matrix Spike
Duplicate
Audit Sample
Matrix Spike
Matrix Spike
Matrix Spike
Matrix Spike
Duplicate
Matrix Spike
Duplicate
Matrix Spike
Duplicate
Description
For VOC
For RGB's
For CB, CP, and
PAH
For VOC
For PCB's
For CB. CP, and
PAH
For VOC
Matrix spikes not conducted on test com
Matrix Spike
Matrix Spike
Matrix Spike
Matrix Spike
Duplicate
Matrix Spike
Duplicate
Matrix Spike
Duplicate
For PCB's
For CB. CP, and
PAH
For VOC
For PCB's
For CB, CP. and
PAH
For VOC
Matrix spikes not conducted on test cone
Analytical
Frequency
Once for the test
condition 2
prior to test
Once for the test
condition 2 and 3
Once for the test
condition 2 and 3
Once for the test
condition 2 and 3
Once for the test
condition 2 and 3
Once for the test
condition 2 and 3
Once for the test
condition 2 and 3
Archive
Frequency
—
•
•»•— •
-
««•
Data Quality
Indicator
Analytical
Precision,
VOC
Ash
Accuracy,
PCB
CB. CP,
PAH
Accuracy,
VOC
Precision,
PCB
CB. CP.
PAH
Precision,
VOC
ition 1 due to a limited amount of sample
Once for the test
condition 2 and 3
Once for the test
condition 2 and 3
Once for the teat
condition 2 and 3
Once for the test
condition 2 and 3
Once for the test
condition 2 and 3
Once for the test
condition 2 and 3
_____
«_»
_____
_ _ _ _ _
_____
_____
Accuracy,
PCB
CB. CP,
PAH
Accuracy,
VOC
Precision,
PCB
CB, CP,
PAH
Precision,
VOC
tion 1 due to a limited amount of sample
A4-17
-------
TABLE A4-2. SAMPLING AND ANALYTICAL PROBLEMS IDENTIFIED BY THE INTERNAL
QA/QC ACTIVITIES
Sample
location
ssr
SS2
SS3
SS4
SS5
SS3
Analytes
VOC
CP.C8
PAH
Density
Total organic carbon
PH
Total sulfur (as S)
Organic halogens (as chloride)
Inorganic halogens (as chloride)
PCDD/PCDF
PCS
Metals
Hexavalent chromium
VOC
CP.CB
PAH
Ash
Ultimate analysis
Total halogens (as chloride)
PCOO/PCDF
PCS
Hexavalent chromium
Metals
Total sulfur (as S)
Healing Value (Blu/lb)
VOC
CP.C8
PAH
PCDD/PCDF
PCS
Total halogens (as chloride)
Organic halogens (as chloride)
Metals
Total sulfur (as S)
Ash
TCLPvolatites
TCLP metals
Total organic carbon
Hexavalent chromium
Tola) sulfur (as S)
Density
3H
Hexavalent chromium
Organic halogens (as chloride)
Inorganic halogens (as chloride)
Metals
Tola) sulfur (as S)
Density
PH
•Hexavalent chromium
Organic halogens (as chloride)
norgante halogens (as chloride)
Metals
VOC
Sulfur compounds
Heating value
PCS
CP.CB
SS9
vex;
PCB
P.CB
voc
PCB
CP.C8
r«ed gases
Sulfur compounds
A4-18
-------
TABLE A4-2. SAMPLING AND ANALYTICAL PROBLEMS IDENTIFIED BY THE INTERNAL
QA/QC ACTIVITIES
(continued)
Sample
location
~53f
TS
S11
SS12
Test Condition JH
Test Condition #2
Test Condition^
Analytes
VOC
CP. C8
PAH
PCDD/PCDF
PCB
Organic halogens (as chloride)
Inorganic halogens (as chloride)
Metals
Total sulfur (as S)
Ash
TCLPvolatiles
TCLP metals
Total organic carbon
Hexavatent chromium
VOC
CP.CB
PCDD/PCDF
PCB
PAH
Organic halogens (as chloride)
Inorganic halogens (as chloride)
Metals
Total sulfur (as S)
Ash
TCLPvolatiles '
TCLP metals
Total organic carbon
Hexavalent chromium
5JT
CP.CB
Ultimate analysts
Organic halogens (as chloride)
Inorganic halogens (as chloride)
PCDO/PCDF
PCB
PAH
Petals
Total sulfur (as S)
TCLP volatites
TCLP metals
texavatent chromium
Density
H
P. C8
PAH
Ultimate
"otal organic carbon
Organic halogens (as chloride)
norganic halogens (as chloride)
PCDD/PCDF
PCB
Metals
otal sulfur (as S)
•lexavatent chromium
Density
H
SSU
OC
PCB
CP.CB
CDD/PCDF
A4-19
-------
TABLE A4-2. SAMPLING AND ANALYTICAL PROBLEMS IDENTIFIED BY THE INTERNAL
QA/QC ACTIVITIES
(continued)
Sample
location
Analytes
--—--w——-
SS14
(com)
Fixed gases
Sulfur compounds
Healing value
SS15
VOC
CP.C8
PAH
Organic halogens (as chloride)
Inorganic halogens (as chloride)
PCDD/PCDF
PCS
Hexavatent chromium
Metals
Total sulfur (as S)
Total organic carbon
SS16
VOC
PCS
CP.CB
PCDO/PCDF
PAH
Trace metals
P articulate
HCI
Opacty
O2
C02
CO
NOx
S02
THC
SS19
VOC
PCS
CP.CB
PCDO/PCDF
SS18
VOC
IP.CB
'AH
Organic halogens (as chloride)
norgante halogens (as chloride)
PCDO/PCDF
•lexavalent chromium
Metals
Total sulfur (as S)
Total organic carbon
SS20
Metals
SS22
VOC
IP.CB
'AH
Ultimata
'otal organic carbon
Organic halogens (as chloride)
norgante halogens (as chloride)
PCDO/PCDF
PCB
•lexavalent chromium
Metals
otal sulfur (as S)
Density
>H
A4-20
-------
TABLE A4-2. SAMPLING AND ANALYTICAL PROBLEMS IDENTIFIED BY THE INTERNAL
QA/QC ACTIVITIES
(continued)
Sample
location
SS24
est Condition #1
Test Condition #2
Test Condition #3'
Run #1 Run #2
12-Qct-92
Run #2
7-Dee-92
Run #1 Run #2
24-Oct-92
VOC
CP.CB
PAH
PCOD/PCDF
PCS
Organic halogens (as chloride)
Inorganic halogens (as chloride)
Metals
Total sulfur (as S)
Ash
Total organic carbon
Hexavatont chromium
A4-21
-------
TABLE A4-2b. KEY TO ANNOTATED TABLES
Footnote
Number
1
2
3
4
S
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
Description
Surrogate recoveries for the acid compounds were below quality control limits.
This was caused by harsh conditions during the extraction procedure. CP for
these samples should be considered estimates.
Exhibited low internal standard areas resulting in high surrogate recoveries due
to matrix effect- sample was run twice to confirm matrix effect.
Samples analyzed or extracted out of holding time.
Analysis not performed due to insufficient sample volume, anaiytes low on
priority list Reid clearance from FW and EPA.
Analysis for total halogens {as Cl)
Sample diluted with 1 liter of Dl water.
Samples were not spiked with surrogates before extraction.
Benzene saturation, very low or no internal standards detected. Results
calculated from external standard method. Possible loss of all halogenated
compounds due to matrix. All data qualitative (tube pairs affected).
Leaky autosampler caused a system failure. Data lost: Results should be
considered qualitative (tube pairs affected). :
Valve and line contamination from high concentrations in previous samples.
Benzene, dichlorobenzene, bromoform initial calibration failure. Results for
these compounds are estimates (tube pairs affected). ;
Broken tube, no data (tube pairs affected).
High 1,2-dichloroethane-d4 surrogate failure due to unknown matrix
Interferences (tube pairs affected).
High totuene-dS surrogate failure due to unknown meblx interferences (tube
pairs affected).
High 4-bromoflourobenzene surrogate failure due to unknown matrix
Interferences (tube pairs affected).
Low 1.2-dchloroethane-d4 surrogate failure due to unknown matrix interferences
(tube pairs affected).
Low toluene-d3 surrogate failure due to unknown matrix interferences (tube pairs
affected).
Low 4-bromoflourobenzene surrogate failure due to unknown matrix
Interferences (tube pairs affected).
Tubes mixed between SS16 and SS14, sampled twice (tube pairs affected).
Filter ripped.
Post-test leak rate of 0.075 cfm.
Filters not weighed before digestion.
Faulty photomultipjier tube - Hg results questionable. [
NOx drift beyond control limits, data corrected for drift
Mlslabeled sample prep date, sample run out of holding time
Heating value analysis indicated only 66% propane, which is unreasonable.
Heating value for propane from vendor was used instead.
OCOD found In method blanks.
Contains a large peak with a retention time of 24.13 minutes, reported as EMPC
[or the tetra- and penta-. Naphthalene peak occurs at the same retention time,
suggesting that these EMPC are due to naphthalene interference.
The MS/MSD conducted on this matrix resulted in low recoveries for mono-
through deca- and low precision for tri- and penta-.
The MS/MSD conducted on this matrix resulted in low recoveries for mono-,
penta-, and deca-, and low precision for mono-.
Corrective Action
Flag CP as estimates. Possible tow
bias.
Flag VOC results as estimates.
Possible high bias.
Flag all results as estimates. Results
may be low.
None; delete from completeness
objective.
Adjust results sheet
Correct data before reporting.
Flag CB, CP, and PAH data. Accuracy
based on internal standard recoveries.
Flag all VOC data and omit from any
averaging. Results for halogenated
compounds may be low.
Flag all VOC data and omit from any
averaging.
Flag benzene, dtehlorobenzane,
bromoform as estimates.
Lost VOC data.
Flag VOC data. Possible high bias.
Flag VOC data. Possible high bias.
Flag VOC data. Possible high bias.
Flag VOC data. Possible low bias.
Flag VOC data. Possible low bias.
Flag VOC data. Possible low bias.
Lost VOC data
Flag particulate results as estimate.
Data for matals and particulate
corrected for leak (7.1% of total sample
volume).
Lost particulate data. Did not meet
completeness objective for particulate.
Flag Hg results.
Data corrected for drift
Flag data as estimates. Results may
below.
Flag C1-C6 hydrocarbon results.
Flag OCDD results. Results may be
high.
Flag penta- and tetra- results. Possible
high bias due to interference from
naphthalene.
Flag SS12 C3 PCS results. Possible
low bias and low precision.
Flag SS22 C3 PCS results. Possible
low bias and low precision.
A4-22
-------
TABLE A4-2b. KEY TO ANNOTATED TABLES
(continued)
Footnote
Number
30
31
32
33
34
3!5
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
4S
46
47
48
49.
SO'
51
52
53
54
Description
Did not meet organic halogen precision objective.
Did not meet sulfur precision objective.
Did not meet hydrogen precision objective.
Did not meet CO2 accuracy or precision objectives.
MS/MSD for this matrix resulted in low recoveries for acid compounds 4-
nitrophenol and pentachlorophenol. Acid surrogate recoveries were aJso low due
to matrix affect Flag CP as estimates for this matrix.
This matrix contained high concentrations of phenol and pyrene. MS/MSD
recoveries for these two compounds could not be calculated due to relatively low
spike level. 4-nitrophenol spike was below detection due to high dilution.
This matrix contained high concentrations of acenaphthene and pyrene.
MS/MSD recoveries for these two compounds could not be calculated due to
relatively low spike level.
Spiking levels in MS and MSD samples for the condition 1 matrix were too low
compared to high concentrations of acenaphthene and pyrene. Percent
recoveries for these two compounds could not be calculated.
4-nitrophenol spike was below detection due to high dilution.
High level of benzene saturated column resulting in poor repeatability.
Benzene in the MS/MSD and corresponding sample saturated the detector,
causing poor repeatability.
Metals Train Field Blank contamination.
Did not meet PAH SS16 accuracy objective.
Low internal standards recoveries but surrogate recoveries were acceptable;
data are considered good estimate (pairs affected).
No field blank data; data system fault.
Benzene saturation and high levels of toluene. Internal standards were
suppressed and many compounds were unidentifable. High surragote
recoveries due to the suppressed IS.
ntemal standards failed to meet minimum area requirements, causing high
surrogate recoveries.
High levels of native OCDD saturated the detector signal. This should be
regarded as the minimum possible concentration.
Laboratory blank was contaminated from previous sample that eluted through
gel-permeation dean-up.
The low surrogate recoveries and corresponding analyte levels were due to the
material absorbing to the precipitate that formed in the extract
Method blank contained detections for tri- and tetra- above 10% of the sample
value.
Field duplicate yielded low precision due to high concentrations and poor
repeatability.
Field duplicate yielded low precision due to high levels of native analytes,
resulting in poor repeatability.
MSD resulted in high pyrene recoveries. This one result did not meet the
precision objective.
Peak response shift due to matrix interference, high saturation, poorly resolved
peaks, cooluting interferences.
Sample not analyzed.
Corrective Action
Flag SS1 and SS18 organic halogens.
Low precision.
Flag SS1 and SS18 total sulfur. Low
precision.
Flag SS2 hydrogen. Low precision.
Flag SS9 and SS14 CO2 results.
Accuracy and precision did not meet
objectives.
Flag CP results as estimates for SS1 .
Possible low bias.
Flag SS1 1 PAH data. Accuracy and
precision not documented.
Flag SS12 PAH data. Accuracy and
precision not documented.
Flag SS22 PAH data. Accuracy and
precision not documented.
Flag SS1 1 C3 VOC data. Low
precision.
Flag SS12 C3 data. Low precision.
Flag results. Results may by high due
to high background levels.
Flag SS16 PAH data. Low accuracy.
Flag VOC data as good estimates.
Background levels are unknown; flag
VOC data.
Flag data as qualitative only. Probable
high bias.
Flag VOC data as estimates. Possible
high bias.
Flag OCDD as minimum amount.
Flag PAH data as high due to
contamination.
Flag PCS data. Possible low bias.
Flag PCB tri and tetra data Results
may be statistically insignificant
Flag SS3 PCB data. Low precision.
Flag VOC SS3 data Low precision.
Flag SS3 PAH data Low precision anc
possible high bias for pyrene.
Flag PCDD/PCDF data as estimates.
Flag data
A4-23
-------
TABLE A4-3. SS16 SVOC QA BLANK RESULTS
PCB
SS16
TOTAL MONO PCB
TOTAL Dl PCB |
TOTAL TRI PCB
TOTAL TETRA PCB
TOTAL PENTA PCB ;
TOTAL HEXA PCB ,
TOTAL HEPTA PCB !
TOTAL OCTA PCB
TOTAL NONA PCB
DECA PCB
TOTAL PCB
TOTAL PCB + EMPC
Minimum
Maximum
Average
Proof
blank
(ng)
ND 0.001
EMPC/B 0.40
EMPC/B 0.21
ND 0.001
ND 0.001
ND 0.001
ND 0.001
ND 0.001
ND 0.001
ND 0.001
N/A
0.61
Field
blank
ftig)
ND 0.003
EMPC 0.100
ND 0.080
ND 0.008
EMPC 0.020
ND 0.010
0.020
ND 0.001
ND 0.010
ND 0.040
0.020
0.140
0.001
0.140
0.03S
ND- Not detected \
EMPC - Estimated maximum possible concentration
N/A - Not applicable
B - Method blank contains levels greater than 20%
A4-24
-------
TABLE A4-3. SS16 SVOC QA BLANK RESULTS
(continued)
PCDD/PCDF
SS16
2378 TCDD
12378 PeCDD
1 23478 HxCDD
1 23678 HxCDD
123789 HxCDD
1234678 HpCDD
OCDD
2378 TCDF
12378 PeCDF
23478 PeCDF
1 23478 HxCDF
1 23678 HxCDF
234678 HxCDF
123789 HxCDF
1234678 HpCDF
1234789 HpCDF
OCDF
TOTAL TCDD
TOTAL PeCDD
TOTAL HxCDD
TOTAL HpCDD
TOTAL TCDF
TOTAL PeCDF
TOTAL HxCDF
TOTAL HpCDF
Minimum
Maximum
Average
Proof
biank
(ng)
ND 0,01
ND 0.02
ND 0.02
ND 0.01
ND 0.02
ND 0.02
0.49
0.02
ND 0.01
ND 0.01
ND 0.02
ND 0.01
ND 0.02
ND 0.02
ND 0.01
ND 0.02
ND 0.02
ND 0.01
ND 0.02 •
ND 0.02
ND 0.02
0.08
ND 0.01
ND 0.01
ND 0.01
0.010
0.490
0.037
Field
blank
(ng)
ND 0.008
ND 0.010
ND 0.008
ND 0.005
ND 0.008
E/B 0.040
B 0.610
ND 0.005
ND 0.008
ND 0.008
ND 0.005
ND 0.005
E 0.006
ND 0.008
ND 0.005
ND 0.008
ND 0.010
ND 0.008
ND 0.010
ND 0.008
0.030
ND 0.005
ND 0.008
E 0.005
ND 0.005
0.005
0.610
0.033
ND - Not detected
E- Estimated
B - Method blank contains levels greater than 20%
A4-25
-------
TABLE A4-3. SS16 SVOC QA BLANK RESULTS
(continued)
<
PAH
SS16
Naphthalene
2-Methylnaphthalene
2-CI-Naphthalene
Acenaphthylene
Acenapthene
Fluorene
Phenanthrene
Anthracene
Ruoranthene
Pyrene • ;-
Benzo (a) anthracene
Chrysene
Benzo (b) fluoranthene
Benzo (k) fluoranthene
Benzo (e) pyrene
Benzo (a) pyrene
Perylene
Indeno (1,2,3-cd) pyrene
Dibenz (a,h) anthracene
Benzo (g,h,i) perylene
Minimum
Maximum
Average
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Proof
blank
(ng)
0.13
0.21
0.27
0.17
0.29
0.22
0.17
0.16
0.13
0.17
0.20
0.20
0.25
0.24
0.27
0.28
0.31
0.44
0.42
0.38
E
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Field
blank
(US)
15.98
3.68
3.58
2.75
3.84
3.54
2.06
2.19
2.07
1.91
2.44
2.63
2.54
2.37
2.70
2.77
2.76
3.08
3.20
3.04
1.91
15.98
3.46
ND - Not detected
E - Estimated
A4-26
-------
TABLE A4-3. SS16 SVOC QA BLANK RESULTS
(continued)
CB, CP
SS16
2-CHLOROPHENOL
3/4 CHLOROPHENOL
1.3DICHLOROBENZENE
1.4DICHLOROBENZENE
1.2DICHLOROBENZENE
2,4 DICHLOROPHENOL
1,2,3,5-TETRACHLOROBENZENE
1 ,2,4,5-TETRACHLOROBENZENE
1.2,3-TRICHLOROBENZENE
1 ,3,5-TRICHLOROBENZENE
2.3 DICHLOROPHENOL
2,5 DICHLOROPHENOL
2,6 DICHLOROPHENOL
1,2,4-TRICHLOROBENZENE
1 ,2.3,4-TETRACHLOROBENZENE
2,3,4,5-TETRACHLOROPHENOL
2,3,4 TRICHLOROPHENOL
2,3,5,6-TETRACHLOROPHENOL
2,3,5 TRICHLOROPHENOL
2,3,6 TRICHLOROPHENOL
3,4 DICHLOROPHENOL
3,5 DICHLOROPHENOL
2,4,6 TRICHLOROPHENOL
2,4,5 TRICHLOROPHENOL
PENTACHLOROBENZENE
HEXACHLOROBENZENE
PENTACHLOROPHENOL
Minimum
Maximum
Average
Field
blank
(ug)
W^«r
ND 8.27
ND 5.88
ND 7.08
ND 6.96
ND 6.73
ND 7.80
ND 4.82
ND 4.82
ND 6.43
ND 6.93
ND 8.27
ND 8.75
ND 7.49
ND 7.02
ND 5.88
ND 8.18
ND 9.34
ND 9.76
ND 10.53
ND 9.67
ND 7.83
ND 7.00
ND 10.09
ND 9.77
ND 5.59
ND 5.61
ND 10.19
4.82
10.53
7.66
ND = Not detected
A4-27
-------
TABLE A4-4. SS16 SVOC METHOD BLANK RESULTS
PCB
Condition and run
TOTAL MONO PCB
TOTAL Dl PCB
TOTAL TRI PCB
TOTAL TETRA PCB
TOTAL PENTA PCB
TOTAL HEXA PCB
TOTAL HEPTA PCB
TOTAL OCTA PCB
TOTAL NONA PCB
DECA PCB
TOTAL PCB
TOTAL PCB + EMPC
METHOD BLANK RESULTS (ng)
C1R1
ND 0.02
EMPC 0.63
EMPC 0.36
ND 0.04
ND 0.06
ND 0.06
ND 0.06
ND 0.05
ND 0.07
ND 0.30
N/A
0.99
C1R2
ND 0.003
ND 0.003
ND 0.005
ND 0.008
EMPC 0.020
ND 0.008
ND 0.008
ND 0.008
ND 0.010
ND 0.040
N/A
0.020
C1R3
ND 0.003
EMPC 0.320
EMPC 0.200
ND 0.008
ND 0.010
ND 0.008
ND 0.008
ND 0.008
ND 0.010
ND 0.040
N/A
0.520
C2R1
ND 0.005
EMPC 0.040
ND 0.008
ND 0.010
EMPC 0.080
ND 0.020
ND 0.010
ND 0.020
ND 0.010
ND 0.050
N/A
0.120
C2R2
ND 0.04
0.30
EMPC 0.20
ND 0.10
ND 0.20
ND 0.20
ND 0.10
ND 0.10
ND 0.10
ND 0.50
0.30
0.50
C3R1 '
ND 0.003
EMPC 0.260
ND 0.008
ND 0.010
EMPC 0.060
ND 0.020
ND 0.010
ND 0.010
ND 0.010
ND 0.050
N/A
0.330
C3R2
ND 0.003
EMPC 0.260
ND 0.008
ND 0.010
EMPC 0.060
ND 0.020
ND 0.010
ND 0.010
ND 0.010
ND 0.050
N/A
0.330
C3R3
ND 0.01
EMPC 0.51
EMPC 0.32
ND 0.02
ND 0.03
ND 0.20
ND 0.02
ND 0.02
ND 0.04
ND 0.20
N/A
0.83
ND- Not detected
EMPC - Estimated maximum possible concentration
N/A- Not available
-------
TABLE A4-4. SS16 SVOC METHOD BLAWSC RESULTS
(continued)
PCDD/PCDF
Condition and run
2378 TCDD
12378 P0CDD
123478 HxCDD
123678 HxCDD
123789 HxCDD
1234678 HpCDD
OCDD
2378 TCDF
12378 PeCDF
23478 PeCDF
123478 HxCDF
123678 HxCDF
234678 HxCDF
123789 HxCDF
1234678 HpCDF
1234789 HpCDF
OCDF
TOTAL TCDD
TOTAL PeCDD
TOTAL HxCDD
TOTAL HpCDD
TOTAL TCDF
TOTAL PeCDF
TOTAL HxCDF
TOTAL HpCDF
C1R1
ND 0.003
ND 0.003
ND 0.008
ND 0.005
ND 0.008
E 0.02
0.37
0.03
ND 0.005
ND 0.005
ND 0.005
ND 0.003
ND 0.005
ND 0.005
ND 0.005
ND 0.008
0.01
0.06
ND 0.008
ND 0.008
E 0.02
0.13
E 0.006
ND 0.005
ND 0.005
C1R2
ND 0.02
ND 0.03
ND 0.03
ND 0.02
ND 0.03
E 0.09
1.9
ND 0.01
ND 0.02
ND 0.02
ND 0.02
ND 0.01
ND 0.02
ND 0.02
ND 0.02
NO 0.03
ND 0.04
ND 0.02
ND 0.03
ND 0.02
0.07
ND 0.01
ND 0.02
ND 0.02
ND 0.02
METHOD BLANK RESULTS (ng)
blip
C1R2
ND 0.02
ND 0.01
ND 0.01
ND 0.008
ND 0.01
0.04
0.53
ND 0.01
ND 0.01
ND 0.01
ND 0.08
ND 0.05
E 0.01
ND 0.01
ND 0.008
ND 0.01
ND 0.02
NO 0.02
ND 0.01
ND 0.01
0.07
ND 0.01
ND 0.01
E 0.01
ND 0.008
C1R3
ND 0.03
ND 0.04
ND 0.04
ND 0.03
ND 0.04
0.05
0.44
E 0.02
0.03
ND 0.03
ND 0.03
ND 0.02
ND 0.03
ND 0.03
ND 0.02
ND 0.04
ND 0.04
ND 0.03
ND 0.04
ND 0.03
0.05
E 0.02
ND 0.03
ND 0.03
ND 0.03
C2R1
ND 0.01
NO 0.02
ND 0.02
ND 0.01
ND 0.02
ND 0.02
0.4
ND 0.01
ND 0.01
ND 0.01
ND .0.01
ND 0.01
NO 0.01
ND 0.01
ND 0.01
ND 0.02
NO 0.03
ND 0.01
ND 0.02
ND 0.01
ND 0.02
ND 0.01
ND 0.01
ND 0.01
ND 0.01
Dup
C2R1
NA
NA
NO 0.2
NO 0.2
ND 0.2
ND 0.4
E 0.8
NA
NA
NA
NO 0.1
ND 0.1
ND 0.1
ND 0.2
NO 0.2
ND 0.3
ND 0.4
NA
NA
ND 0.2
ND 0.4
NA
NA
ND 0.1
ND 0.2
C2R2
ND 0
ND 0.1
ND 0.1
ND 0.1
ND 0.1
ND 0.1
0.4
ND 0
ND 0
ND 0
ND 0
ND 0
ND 0
ND 0.1
ND 0
ND 0.1
ND 0.1
ND 0
ND 0.1
ND 0.1
ND 0.1
NO 0
NO 0
ND 0
ND 0.1
SS19
C2R2
NA
NA
ND 0.5
ND 0.4
ND 0.4
ND 0.6
ND 0.9
NA
NA
NA
ND 0.3
NO 0.2
ND 0.3
ND 0.4
NO 0.3
ND 0.5
ND 0.8
NA
NA
ND 0.4
ND 0.6
NA
NA
ND 0.3
ND 0.3
C3R1/R2
NO 0.01
ND 0.01
ND 0.02
ND 0.01
ND 0.01
0.03
0.36
ND 0.008
ND 0.01
ND 0.01
ND 0.01
ND 0.008
E 0.01
ND 0.01
ND 0.01
ND 0.02
ND 0.02
ND 0.01
NO 0.01
NO 0.01
0.05
ND 0.008
ND 0.01
E 0.01
ND 0.01
C3R3
ND 0.008
ND 0.01
ND 0.01
ND 0.01
ND 0.01
ND 0.02
0.21
ND 0.005
ND 0.008
NO 0.008
ND 0.01
ND 0.008
ND 0.008
ND 0.01
ND 0.008
ND 0.02
ND 0.02
ND 0.008
E 0.02
E 0.06
ND 0.02
ND 0.005
NO 0.008
ND 0.008
ND 0.01
I
ND- Not detected
E - Estimated
NA- Not available
-------
TABLE A4-4. SS16 SVOC METHOD BLANK RESULTS
(continued)
PAH
Condition and run
Naphthalene
2-Methylnaphthalene
2-CI-Naphthalene
Acenaphthylene
Acenapthene
Fluorene
Phenanthrene
Anthracene
Fluoranthene
Pyrene
Benzo (a) anthracene
Chrysene
Benzo (b) f luoranthene
Benzo (k) f luoranthene
Benzo (e) pyrene
Benzo (a) pyrene
Peryiene
Indeno (1,2,3-cd) pyrene
Dlbenz (a,h) anthracene
Benzo (g.h.l) perylene
METHOD BLANK RESULTS (ng)
C1R1
E 384.27
ND 0.80
ND 1.05
ND 0.65
ND
ND 0.97
ND 0.69
ND 0.68
ND 0.52
ND 0.56
ND 0.60
ND 0.65
ND 0.53
ND 0.53
ND 0.54
ND 0.57
ND 0.66
ND 0.55
ND 0.64
ND 0.59
C1R2
E 27.31
ND 3.36
ND 2.96
ND 2.27
ND 3.17
ND 2.92
ND 1.95
ND 2.07
ND 1.96
ND 2.20
ND 2.80
ND 3.02
NO 3.32
ND 3.09
ND 3.53
ND 3.62
ND 3.61
ND 4.03
ND 4.19
ND 3.97
C1R3
E 3.10
ND 0.95
ND 0.71
ND 0.55
ND 0.74
ND 0.67
ND 0.45
ND 0.51
ND 0.45
ND 0.43
ND 0.53
ND 0.57
ND 0.51
ND 0.48
ND 0.55
ND 0.54
ND 0.56
ND 0.58
ND 0.62
ND 0.56
C2R1
E 3.49
ND 0.74
ND 1.00
ND 0.64
ND 1.03
ND 0.85
ND 0.52
ND 0.50
ND 0.36
ND 0.33
ND 0.29
ND 0.31
ND 0.23
ND 0.23
ND 0.24
ND 0.25
ND 0.34
ND 0.21
ND 0.25
ND 0.23
C2R2
ND 0.53
ND 0.74
ND 0.93
ND 0.59
ND 0.95
ND 0.79
ND 0.43
NO 0.41
ND 0.29
NO 0.19
ND 0.17
ND 0.18
ND 0.14
ND 0.14
ND 0.15
ND 0.15
ND 0.21
ND 0.13
ND 0.15
ND 0.14
C3R1
ND 5.40
NO 6.73
ND 7.36
ND 4.90
ND 7.41
ND 6.52
ND 4.39
ND 4.23
ND 4.09
ND 4.73
ND 6.58
ND 7.46
ND 8.05
ND 7.93
ND 7.80
ND 7.96
ND 8.44
ND 6.61
ND 7.48
ND 7.25
C3R3
ND 0.57
ND 0.75
ND 0.73
ND 0.47
ND 0.83
ND 0.63
ND 0.44
ND 0.44
ND 0.47
ND 0.58
ND 0.75
ND 0.82
ND 1.18
ND 1.24
ND 1.20
ND 1.29
ND 1.90
ND 1.73
ND 1.74
ND 1.63
ND = Not detected; E = Estimated
-------
TABLE A4-4. SS16 SVOC METHOD BLANK RESULTS
(continued)
CB/CP
Condition and run
2-CHLOROPHENOL
3/4CHLOROPHENOL
1,3 DICHLOROBENZENE
1,4 DICHLOROBENZENE
1.2 DICHLOROBENZENE
2.4 DICHLOROPHENOL
1.2.3.S-TETRACHLOROBENZENE
1 ,2,4.5-TETRACHLOROBENZENE
1 ,2,3-TRICHLOROBENZENE
1 ,3,5-TRICHLOROBENZENE
2.3 DICHLOROPHENOL
2.5 DICHLOROPHENOL
2.6 DICHLOROPHENOL
1 ,2.4-TRICHLOROBENZENE
1.2.3,4-TETRACHLOROBENZENE
2.3,4.5-TETRACHLOROPHENOL
2,3,4 TRICHLOROPHENOL
2.3.5.6-TETRACHLOROPHENOL
2.3.5 TRICHLOROPHENOL
2,3,6 TRICHLOROPHENOL
3,4 DICHLOROPHENOL
3,5 DICHLOROPHENOL
2.4,6 TRICHLOROPHENOL
2.4.5 TRICHLOROPHENOL
PENTACHLOROBENZENE
HEXACHLOROBENZENE
PENTACHLOROPHENOL
C1R1
ND 3.94
ND 3.42
ND 3.01
ND 3.05
ND 3.24
ND 4.25
ND 2.32
ND 2.32
ND 2.95
ND 3.08
ND 3.73
ND 4.07
ND 3.69
ND 2.91
ND 2.08
ND 3.46
ND 3.74
ND 4.51
ND 4.26
ND 3.61
ND 3.31
ND 2.96
ND 3.84
ND 3.94
ND 2.06
ND 2.25
ND 5.30
C1R2
ND 7.62
ND 5.42
ND 6.52
ND 6.41
ND 6.20
ND 7.12
ND 4.40
ND 4.40
ND 5.87
ND 6.33
ND 7.55
ND 7.98
ND 6.84
ND 6.41
ND 4.85
ND 6.75
ND 7.71
ND 8.06
ND 8.69
ND 7.99
ND 6.46
ND 5.78
ND 8.33
ND 8.06
ND 4.62
ND 5.30
ND 9.64
~ METHOD BLANK HbSULTSfcg} — — 1
C1R3
ND 2.02
ND 0.88
ND 1.57
ND 1.57
ND 1.59
ND 1.84
ND 0.56
ND 0.56
ND 1.33
ND 1.50
ND 1.94
ND 2.02
ND 1.73
ND 1.52
ND 1.63
ND 1.81
ND 1.81
ND 1.85
ND 1.78
ND 1.44
ND 1.45
ND 1.80
ND 1.80
ND 1.81
ND 1.03
ND 1.17
ND 2.65
C2R1
ND 4.85
ND 2.44
ND 4.49
ND 4.48
ND 4.55
ND 5.58
ND 3.14
ND 3.58
ND 5.06
ND 4.64
ND 7.15
ND 6.01
ND 5.50
ND 4.69
ND 4.14
ND 5.75
ND 7.16
ND 5.69
ND 7.00
ND 6.77
ND 6.87
ND 6.23
ND 7.05
ND 7.27
ND 3.23
ND 3.02
ND 6.65
C2R2
ND 4.27
ND 2.15
ND 3.95
ND 3.94
ND 4.01
ND 4.97
ND 2.79
ND 3.18
ND 4.50
ND 4.13
ND 6.37
ND 5.36
ND 4.89
ND 4.17
ND 3.53
ND 4.90
ND 6.09
ND 4.85
ND 5.96
ND 5.77
ND 5.85
ND 5.30
ND 6.00
ND 6.19-
ND 2.75
ND 2.75
ND 6.04
C3R1
ND 1.95
ND 0.40
ND 1.77
ND 1.79
ND 1.85
ND 1.64
ND 0.78
ND 0.78
ND 1.78
ND 1.63
ND 1.96
ND 2.05
ND 0.74
ND 1.64
ND 1.66
ND 1.86
ND 2.40
ND 3.00
ND 2.62
ND 2.33
ND 1.83
ND 0.77
ND 2.36
ND 2.11
ND 1.69
ND 2.27
ND 5.18
C3R2
ND 1.95
ND 0.40
ND 1.77
ND 1.79
ND 1.85
ND 1.64
ND 0.78
ND 0.78
ND 1.78
ND 1.63
ND 1.96
ND 2.05
ND 0.74
ND 1.64
ND 1.66
ND 1.86
ND 2.40
ND 3.00
ND 2.62
ND 2.33
ND 1.83
ND 0.77
ND 2.36
ND 2.11
ND 1.69
ND 2.27
ND 5.18
C3R3
ND 0.35
ND 0.07
ND 0.32
NO 0.32
ND 0.33
ND 0.27
ND 0.26
ND 0.26
ND 0.30
ND 0.27
ND 0.33
ND 0.34
ND 0.12
ND 0.27
ND 0.30
ND 0.33
ND 0.43
ND 0.54
ND 0.47
ND 0.42
ND 0.33
ND 0.14
ND .0.42
ND 0.38
ND 0.30
ND 0.39
ND 0.88
ND-Not detected
-------
TABLE A4-5. SS16 SVOC SURROGATE RECOVERIES
£
'&
Sample
ID
SS16
Condition 1
Run1
Run 2
Run 3
Average
RSD%
SS16
Condition 2
Run1
Run 2
Avorago
RPD%
SS16
Condition 3
Run 1
Run 2
Run 3
.. Average
RSD%
SURROGATE RECOVERY (%)
37CI-2,3,7,8-TCDD
102
115
1.33
72.78
85.40
120
117
118.50
2.53
82.2
73.2
94
83.13
12.55
13C12-2,3,4,7,8-PeCDF
102
115
2.48
73.16
84.14
117
107
112.00
8.93
97.9
87
119
101.30
16.06
13012-1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDF
116
121
2.03
79.68
84.45
113
116
114.50
2.62
92.4
91.9
131
105.10
21.34
13C12-1.2.3.4.7.8-HXCDD
116
124
1.43
80.48
85.21
118
117
117.50
0.85
118
130
106
118.00
' 10.17
13C12-1.2,3.4,7,8.9-HpCDF
101
119
2.45
74.15
84.62
•147
125
136.00
16.18
96.7
97.1
122
105.27
13.77
-------
TABLE A4-5. SS16 SVOC SURROGATE RECOVERIES
(continued)
Sample
ID
SS16
SS16
SS16
Condition 1
Run1
Run 2
Run3
Average
RSD %
Condition 2
Run1
Run 2
Average
RSD %
Condition 3
Run 1 .
Run 2
Run 3
Average
RSD%
SURROGATE RECOVERY
(%)
Terphenyl-D14
87.50
70.90
64.40
74.27
16.04
56.30
58.20
57.25
2.35
63.10
58.70
92.70
71.50
25.86
A4-33
-------
TABLE A4-6 SS16 SVOC INTERNAL STANDARD RECOVERIES
Sample
ID
SS16
Condition 1
Run1
Run 2
Run 3
Average
RSD %
Condition 2
Runt
Run 2
Average
RPD%
Condition 3
Run1
Run 2
Run3
Average
RSD%
INTERNAL STANDARD RECOVERY (%)
3434-1 3C PCB
37.40
83.00
134.00
84.80
56.99
89.40
45.80
67.60
64.50
105.00
114.00
154.00
124.33
20.98
223355661 3C PCB
29.80
57.40
102.00
63.07
57.77
79.80
46.00
62.90
53.74
103.00 '
116.00
116.00
111.67
6.72
A4-34
-------
TABLE A4-6. SS16 SVOC INTERNAL STANDARD RECOVERIES
SAMPLE ID
SSI 6
Condition 1
Runt
Run 2
Run 3
Average
RSD%
Condition 2
Runt
Run 2
Average
RPD%
Condition 3
Runt
Run 2
Run 3
Average
RSD%
1 3C1 2- 2.3.7.8-
TCDD
84.1
51.3
79.7
71.70
24.83
68.6
64
66.30
6.94
71.7
65.2
45.7
60.87
22.23
13012- 1.2.3.7.8-
PeCDD
73.9
59.6
125
86.23
39.78
71.5
53.4
62.45
28.98
112
97.5
86.6
98.70
12.91
INTERNAL STANDARD RECOVERY (%>
13012-1,2.3.6,7,8-
HxCDD
98.1
74.4
93.5
88.67
14.17
77.2
88.7
82.95
13.86
83.9
90
62.2
78.70
18.57
13C12-
1,2.3.4.6.7.8-
HpCDD
113
79.6
103
98.53
17.40
72.4
69
70.70
4.81
93.1
93.2
48.6
78.30
32.85
13C12- OCOD
89.8
63.1
103
85.30
23.83
61.5
50.2
55.85
20.23
89.9
80.6
29.7
66.73
48.56
13C12- 2.3,7.8-
TCDF
91.3
50.8
81.4
74.50
28.34
72.5
69.4
70.95
4.37
74.3
70.9
50.9
65.37
19.34
13C12- 1.2.3.7.8-
PeCDF
75.5
54.7
94
74.73
26.31
66.5
50.7
58.60
26.96
60.3
74
43.1
65.80
30.26
13C12-
1.2.3.6.7.8-
HxCDF
93.3
64.1
77.5
78.30
18.67
72.4
89.8
81.10
21.45
72
71.1
58.6
67.23
11.14
13C12-
1.2.3.4.6.7.8-
HpCDF
101
71.7
85.7
86.13
17.01
63.7
67.7
65.70
6.09
78.9
75.5
43.3
65.90
29.81
-------
TABLE A4-6. SS16 SVOC INTERNAL STANDARD RECOVERIES
(continued)
Sample
ID
SS16
SS16
SS16
Condition 1
. Run1
Run 2
Run 3
Average
RSD %
Condition 2
Run 1
Run 2
Average
RPD%
Condition 3
Run 1
Run 2
Run 3
Average
RSD%
INTERNAL STANDARD RECOVERY (%)
Pyrene-D10
111.50
i 94.70
! 98.40
181.53
8.69
52.00
53.60
5230
3.03
62.20
88.10
I 104.50
84.93
! 2S.11
A4-36
-------
TABLE A4-7. SS16 SVOC ALTERNATE STANDARD RECOVERIES
Sample
ID
SS16
Condition 1
Run 1
Run 2
Run 3
Average
RSD %
Condition 2
Run 1
Run 2
Average
RPD%
Condition 3
Run 1
Run 2
Run 3
Average
RSD%
ALTERNATE STANDARD RECOVERY (%)
224455-1 3CHEXA
24.60
55.60
85.80
55.33
55.30
86.80
39.40
63.10
75.12
111.00
113.00
84.60
102.87
15.41
A4-37
-------
TABLE A4-7. SS16 SVOC ALTERNATE STANDARD RECOVERIES
(continued)
Sample
ID
SS16
Condition 1
Run1
Run 2
Run 3
Average
RSD%
Condition 2
Run1
Run 2
Average
RPD%
Condition 3
Run1
Run 2
Run3
Average
RSD%
ALTERNATE STANDARD RECOVERY (%)
13C12-1 ,2.3,7,8,9-HxCDF
94.1
74.2
91.9
86.73
12.58 •
80.7
92.1
86.40
13.19
93.2
94.9
59.5
8253
24.19
1 3C1 2-2,3,4,6,7,8-HxCDF
102
83.9
88.4
91.43
10.31
75.6
90.5
83.05
17.94
81.4
96.5
62.2
80.03
21.48
A4-33
-------
TABLE A4-7. SS16 SVOC ALTERNATE STANDARD RECOVERIES
(continued)
Sample
ID
SS16
Condition 1
Run 1
Run 2
Run 3
Average
RSD%
Condition 2
Runt
Run 2
Average
RPD%
Condition 3
Run 1
Run 2
Run 3
Average
RSD%
ALTERNATE STANDARD RECOVERY (%)
Nitrobenzene-05
94.60
82.40
93.60
90.20
7.51
68.60
56.80
62.70
18.82
47.40
49.90
77.20
58.17
28.42
2-fluorobiphenyl
91.30
79.60
82.40
84.43
7.24
66.30
57.60
61.95
14.04
48.20
47.00
58.50
5123
12.34
Anthracene-D10
122.40
96.20
74.90
97.83
24.32
62.20
47.10
54.65
27.63
86.40
88.10
76.20
83.57
7.70
-------
TABLE A4-8. SS16 SVOC LCS/LCSO RESULTS
CB.CP
' TOTAL MONO PCB
. TOTAL Dl PCB
TOTAL TRIPCB
TOTAL TETRAPCB
TOTAL PENTA PCB
TOTAL HEXA PCB
TOTAL HEPTA PCB
TOTAL OCTA PCB
TOTAL NONA PCB
DECA PCB
Minimum
Maximum
Average
LC spike
recovery
46.00
75.00
79.30
70.00
95.10
85.00
85.40
, 87.30
76.00
68.00
LC spike duplicate
recovery
39.00
68.00
72.00
65.00
80.90
77.90
78.80
80.20
; 72.00
66.00
Average
recovery
42.JO
71 .SO
75.65
67.50
88.00
81 45
82.10
83.75
74.00
67.00
42.50
8B.80
73.35
Relative
% difference
16.47
9.79
@.65
7.41
16.14
8.72
8.04
8.48
S.41
2.99
2.99
18.47
3.31
PCB
TOTAL MONO PCB
TOTAL Dl PCB
TOTAL TRIPCB
TOTAL TETRAPCB
TOTAL PENTA PCB
TOTAL HEXA PCB
TOTAL HEPTA PCB
TOTAL OCTA PCB
TOTAL NONA PCB
DECA PCB
TOTAL PCB
• TOTAL PCB + EMPC
Minimum
Maximum
Average
LC spike (^ig)
0.46
0.75
0.84
1.40
2.00
1.70
2.60
2.70
3.80
3.40
19.60
22.80
LC spike duplicate
(H9)
0.39
0.68
0.72
1.30
1.70
1.60
2.40
2.50
3.60
3.30
18.20
21.10
<
Average
recovery
0.43
0.72
0.78
1.35
1.85
1.65
2.S6
2.66
3.70
3.35
18.90
21.95
0.43
21.95
4.98
Relative
% difference
16.47
9.79
15.38
7.41
16.22
6.06
8.6©
7.S9
§.41
2.99
7.41
7.74
2.99
16.47
9.21
A4-40
-------
TABLE A4-8. SS16 SVOC LCS/LCSD RESULTS
(continued)
CB, CP
2-CHLOROPHENOL
1,3 DICHLOROBENZENE
1,4 DICHLOROBENZENE
1,2 DICHLOROBENZENE
2,4 DICHLOROPHENOL
1 ,2,4-TRICHLOROBENZENE
2,4,6 TRICHLOROPHENOL
2,4,5 TRICHLOROPHENOL
HEXACHLOROBENZENE
Minimum
Maximum
Average
LC spike
recovery
120.02
108.71
110.74
130.55
129.19
125.58
106.50
110.90
116.99
LC spike duplicate
recovery (%)
75.58
76.92
75.61
90.14
86.17
83.32
81.04
88.60
100.06
-
Average .
recovery
97.80
92.82
93.18
110.35
107.68
104.45
93.77
99,75
108.53
92.82
110.35
100.92
Relative
% difference
45.44
34,25
37.70
36.62
39.95
40.46
27.15
22.36
15.60
15.60
45.44
33.28
A4-41
-------
TABLE A4-8. SS16 SVOC LCS/LCSO RESULTS
(continued)
PCDD / PCDF
2378 TCDD
12378 PeCDD
1 23478 HxCDD
1 23678 HxCDD
123789 HxCDD
1234678 HpCDD
OCDD
2378 TCDF
12378 PeCDF
23478 PeCDF
123478 HxCDF
123678 HxCOF
234678 HxCDF
123789 HxCDF
1234678 HpCDF
1234789 HpCDF
' OCDF
LC spike recovery
(%)
115.00
85.00
120.00
100.00
88.00
102.00
102.00
106.00
109.00
103.00
99.00
97.00
87.00
89.00
93.00
84.00
105.00
A4-42
-------
TABLE 4-8. S.S16 SVOC LCS/LCSD RESULTS
(continued)
PAH
Naphthalene
2-Methyinaphthalene
2-Chtoroaphthalene
Acenaphthylene
Acenapthene
Fluorene
Phenanthrene
Anthracene
Fluoranthene
Pyrene
Benzo (a) anthracene
Chrysene
Benzo (b) fluoranthene
Benzo (k) fluoranthene
Benzo (a) pyrene
Indeno (1 ,2,3-cd) pyrene
Oibenzo (a,h) anthracene
Benzo (g.h.i) perylene
Minimum
Maximum
Averago
LC spike
recovery
(%)
88.10
84.70
86.64
91.39
86.12
89.54
96.04
92.75
110.28
96.52
97.05
98.45
94.92
94.59
93.64
98.39
100.35
98.48
LC spike
duplicate
recovery
(%)
70.32
73.74
75.03
79.62
75.74
80.86
92.12
85.20
111.56
92.29
89.82
90.81
93.82
96.14
96.00
112,30
119.05
110.16
Average
recovery
(%)
79.21
79.22
80,84
85.51
80.93
85.20
94.08
88.98
110.92
94.41
93.44
94.63
94.37
95.37
94.82
105.35
109.70
104.32
79.21
110.92
92.85
Relative
% difference
22.45
13.83
14.36
13.77
12.83
10.19
4.17
8.49
1.15
4.48
7J4
8.07
1.17
1.63
2.49
13.20
17.05
11.20
1.15
22.45
9.35
A4-43
-------
TABLE A4-8. SS16 SVOC LCS/LCSD RESULTS
(continued)
PAH
Naphthalene
2-Methylnaphthalene
2-ChtoroaphthaIene
Acenaphthylene
Acenapthene
Ruorene
Phenanthrene
Anthracene
Ruoranthene
Pyrene
Benzo (a) anthracene
Chrysene
Benzo (b) fluoranthene
Benzo (k) fluoranthene
Benzo (a) pyrene
indeno (1 ,2,3-cd) pyrene
Oibenzo (a,h) anthracene
Benzo (g.h.i) perylene
Minimum
Maximum
Average
LC spike
recovery
(%)
E 75.62
E 66.36
E 67.00
E 70.92
E 65.64
E 73.33
E 77.57 !
E 63.44
E 75.35 i
E SO."! '-
LC spike
duplicate
recovery
(%)
E 70.27
E 61.70
E 64.69
E 68.65
E 65.55
E 74.01
E 81.11
E 73.69
E 80.34
E 85.53
E 104.C E 112.18
E 82.1 .- E 89.97
E 94.35
E 86.99
E 74.73
E , 73.12
E 42.18
E 72.68
i
E 103.63
E 91.04
E 81.67
E 28.03
E 72.53
E 73.63
Average
recovery
(%)
72.95
64.03
65.85
69.79
65.60
73.67
79.34
70.07
77.85
82.84
108.11
86.23
88.9S
89.81
78.2©
50.58
57.36
73.1i
§0.58
108.11
75.75
Relative
% difference
7.33
7,28
3.51
3.25
0.14
0.92
4.46
10.35
6.41
6.51
7.54
8.63
9.37
4.55
8.87
89.15
52.92
1.30
0.14
89.15
12.92
E • Estimated
A4-44
-------
TABLE A4-9. SS16 SVOC DUPLICATE SUMMARY
CB, CP
SS16 C3R1
TOTAL MONO PCS
TOTAL DIPCB
TOTAL TRI PCB
TOTAL TETRA PCB
TOTAL PENTA PCB
TOTAL HEXA PCB
TOTAL HEPTA PCB
TOTAL OCTA PCB
TOTAL NONA PCB
DECAPCB
TOTAL PCB
TOTAL PCB + EMPC
Minimum
Maximum
Average
Sample (ng)
ND 0.02
EMPC 1.20
ND 0.03
EMPC 3.60
EMPC 0.42
ND 0.04
ND 0.03
ND 0.03
ND 0.03
ND 0.10
N/A
5.20
Duplicate (ng)
ND 0.01
EMPC 1.20
ND 0.01
ND 0.02
EMPC 0.44
ND 0.02
ND 0.02
ND 0.02
ND 0.02
ND 0.07
N/A
1.70
Average (^g)
0.01
1.20
0.02
• 1.81
0.43
0.03
0.03
0.03
0.03
0.09
3.45
0.01
3.45
0.65
Relative
% difference
/ _
85.71
0.00
100.00
197.79
4.65
66.67
40.00
40.00
40.00
35.29
101.45
0.00
197.79
64.69
ND - Not detected;
N/A - Not available
EMPC - Estimated maximun possible concentration
A4-45
-------
TABLE A4-9. SS16 SVOC DUPLICATE SUMMARY
(continued)
PCDD / PCDF
C3R1: SS16
2378 TCDD
12378 PeCDD
123478 HxCDD
123678 HxCDD
123789 HxCDD
1234678 HpCDD
OCDD
2378 TCDF
12378 PeCDF
23478 PeCDF
123478 HxCDF
1 23678 HxCDF
234678 HxCDF
123789 HxCDF
1234678 HpCDF
1 234789 HpCDF
OCDF
Minimum
Maximum
Average
Field sample
(ng)
ND
ND
ND
0.01
0.01
0.06
0.51
0.02
0.02
0.01
0.03
0.01
0.02
ND
6.05
0.01
0.05
; Held
sample
duplicate
(na\
< v 'y/
ND
ND
ND
0.01
0.01
0.05
0.5
0.02
0.02
0.01
0.03
0.01
0.02
0.01
0.05
0.01
0.05
Average
(ng)
0.01
0.01
0.05
0.51
0.02
0.02
0.01
0.03
0.01
0.02
0.05
0.01
0.05
0.01
0.51
0.06
Relative
% difference
33.33
13.33
550
0.79
24.39
5.71
0.36
'3.92
2&Q8
15.38
1.94
10.53
0.00
0.00
33.33
10.84
ND • Not detected
A4-46
-------
TABLE A4-9. SS16 SVOC DUPLICATE SUMMARY
(continued)
PAH
C3R1: SS16
Naphthalene
2-Methylnaphthalene
2-CI-Naphthalene
Acenaphthylene
Acenapthene
Ruorene
Phenanthrene
Anthracene
Ruoranthene
Pyrene
Benzo (a) anthracene
Chrysene
Benzo (b) fluoranthene
Benzo (k) fluoranthene
Benzo (e) pyrene
Benzo (a) pyrene
Perylene
Indeno (1,2,3-cd) pyrene
Oibenz (a,h) anthracene
Benzo (g,h,i) perylene
Minimum
Maximum
Average
Held
sample
fog)
ND 6.18
NO 7.71
ND 8.60
ND 5.73
ND 8.66
ND 7.62
ND 5.21
ND 5.02
ND 4.86
ND 5.09
ND 7.07
ND 8.03
ND 7.97
ND 7.85
ND 7.73
ND 7.89
ND 8.36
ND 6.55
ND 7.40
ND 7.18
Held
sample
duplicate
fog)
ND 6.73
ND 8.40
ND 9.15
ND 6.09
ND 9.21
ND 8.10
ND 5.60
ND 5.40
ND 5.22
ND 5.27
ND 7.33
ND 8.32
ND 8.97
ND 8.83
ND 8.69
ND 8.87
ND 9.40
ND 7.37
ND 8.33
ND 8.08
Average
fog)
6.46
8.06
8.88
5.91
8.94
7.86
5.41
5.21
5.04
5.18
7.20
8.18
8.47
8.34
8.21
8.38
8.88
6.96
7.87
8.88
5.04
8.94
7.41
Relative
% difference
8.52
8.57
6.20
6.09
6.16
6.11
7.22
7.29
7.14
3.47
3.61
3.55
11.81
11.75
11.69
11.69
11.71
11.78
11.82
11.82
3.47
11.82
8.40
ND - Not detected
A4-47
-------
TABLE A4-9. SS16 SVOC DUPLICATE SUMMARY
(continued
•
PAH
C2R2: SS16
Naphthalene
2-Methylnaphthalene
2-CI-Naphthalene
Acenaphthylene
Acenapthene
Fluorene
Phenanthrene
Anthracene
Ruoranthene
Pyrene
Benzo (a) anthracene
Chrysene
Benzo (b) fluoranthene
Benzo (k) fluoranthene
Benzo (e) pyrene
Benzo (a) pyrene
Perylene
Indeno (1 ,2,3-cd) pyrene
Dibenz (a,h) anthracene
Benzo (g.h.i) perylene
Minimum
Maximum
Average
Field sample
Otg)
E 10.74
ND 0.73
NO 0.84
ND 0.53
ND 0.86
ND 0.71
ND 0.39
ND 0.37
ND 0.27
ND 0.17
ND 0.15
ND 0.17
ND 0.14
ND 0.14
ND 0.14
ND 0.15
ND 0.21
ND 0.12
ND 0.15
ND 0.14
Field
sample
duplicate
(M)
E 10.72
ND 0.75
ND 0.84
ND 0.53
ND 0.86
ND 0.71
ND 0.39
ND 0.38
ND 0.27
ND 0.17
ND 0.15
ND 0.16
ND 0.14
ND 0.14
ND 0.14
ND 0.15
ND 0.21
ND 0.12
ND 0.15
ND 0.14
Average
Cng)
10.73
0.74
0.84
0.53
0.86
0.71
0.39
0.38
0.27
9.17
0.15
0.17
0.14
0.14
0.14
0.15
0.21
0.12
0.15
0.21
0.12
10.73
0.86
Relative
% difference
0.19
2.70
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
2.67
0.00
0.00
o.9@
6.06
005
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
6.06
0.58
ND = Not detected; E = Estimated
A4-48
-------
TABLE A4-9. SS16 SVOC DUPLICATE SUMMARY
(continued)
PAH
C2R1: SS16
Naphthalene
2-Methylnaphthalene
2-CI-Naphthalene
Acenaphthylene
Acenapthene
Ruorene
Phenanthrene
Anthracene
Fluoranthene
Pyrene
Benzo (a) anthracene
Chrysene
Benzo (b) fluoranthene
Benzo (k) fluoranthene
Benzo (e) pyrene
Benzo (a) pyrene
Perylene
Indeno (1 ,2,3-cd) pyrene
Dibenz (a,h) anthracene
Benzo (g.h,i) perylene
Minimum
Maximum
Avorago
Field
sample
fog)
E 8.20
ND 0.69
ND 0.82
ND 0.52
ND 0.84
ND 0.70
ND 0.40
ND 0.38
ND 0.27
ND 0.18
ND 0.16
ND 0.17
ND 0.14
ND 0.14
ND 0.14
ND 0.14
ND 0.20
ND 0.12
ND 0.15
ND 0.14
Field
sample
duplicate
fog)
E 8.25
ND 0.77
ND 0.87
ND 0.55
ND 0.89
ND 0.73
ND 0.40
ND 0.38
ND 0.27
ND 0.17
ND 0.15
ND 0.16
ND 0.14
ND 0.14
ND 0.14
ND 0.14
ND 0.20
ND 0.12
ND 0.15
ND 0.13
Average
fog)
8.23
0.73
0.85
0.54
0.87
0.72
0.40
0.38
0.27
0.18
0.16
0.17
0.14
0.14
0.14
0.14
0.20
0.12
0.15
0.20
0.12
8.23
0.73
Relative
% difference
0.61
10.96
5.92
5.61
5.78
4.20
0.00
0.00
0.00
5.71
6.45
6.06
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
10.96
2.56
ND - Not detected; E - Estimated
A4-49
-------
TABLE A4-10. VOST FIELD BLANKS
Compounds
Vinyl chloride
Methytene chloride
trans-1 ,2-dichloroethene
cis-1 ,2-dichloroethene
Chloroform
1,1,1-Trichloroethane
Carbon tetrachtoride
Benzene
1 ,2-Dich!oroethane
Trichloroethene
Toluene
1,12-Trichloroethane
Tetrachkxoethene
1 ,2-Dibromethane
Chlorobenzene
Ethylbenzene
m-/p-Xylene
o-Xylene
1 ,3-Oichlorobenzene
1 ,4-Dichtorobenzene
1 ,2-Dichlorobenzene
Condition 1
field blank #1
I
ND
NO
ND i
NO
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND j
ND ;
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
16 SQL
i
ND
ND
ND
ND
Condition 1
field blank
#2
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Condition 3
field blank
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
PQL
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
100
50
50
50
50
All results are in nanograms
B Q L Below quarrtitation limit
ND Not detected
PQL Practical quantitatbn limit
A4-50
-------
TABLE A4-11. VOST TRIP BLANKS
Compounds
Vinyl chloride
Methylene chloride
trans-1 ,2-dichloroethene
cis-1 ,2-dichloroethene
Chloroform
1 ,1 ,1 -Trichkxoethane
Carbon tetrachtoride
Benzene
1 ,2-Oichloroethane
Trichteroethene
Toluene
1 ,1 ,2-Trichloroethane
Tetrachtoroethene
1 ,2-Dibromethane
Chlorobenzene
Ethylbenzene
nv/p-Xylene
o-Xylene
1 .S-Dtchlorobenzene
1 ,4-Dichlorobenzene
1 ,2-Dichlorobenzene
Condition 1
trip blank
#1
ND
NO
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Condition 1
trip blank
«
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Condition 3
trip blank
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
12 BQL
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
PQL
SO
50
50
50
50
§0
50
50
SO
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
100
50
50
50
50
All results are in nanograms
BQL Belowquantrtatton limit
ND Not detected
PQL Practical quantitatten limit
A4-51
-------
TABLE A4-12. VOST SURROGATE RECOVERIES
Test
condition
Condition 2
Condition 3
•
Run
#
Run 1
Run 2
Run 1
Run 2
Run 3
"Tube
ID
Tube 1 & 2
Tube 3 & 4
Tube 5 & 6
Tube 7 & 8
Tube 1 & 2
Tube 3 & 4
Tube 5 & 6
Tube? & 8
Tube 9 & 10
Tube 11 &12
Tube 1 & 2
Tube 3 & 4
Tube 5 & 6
Tube7&8
Tubol &2
Tube 3 & 4
Tube 5 & 6
Tube 7 & 8
Tubo 1 & 2
Tubo3&4
Tuba 5 & 6
Tube 7 & 8
Surrogate recoveries {%)
1 ,2-dichloroethane-d4
85
80
83
80
85
90
86
97
92
|8S
95
N/A
:o
84
93
99
N/A
77
;88
88
94
94
toluene-d8
96
94
98
105
110
110
104
102
112
105
100
N/A
101
99
101
103
N/A
98
91
96
100
96
•bromofluorobenzene
116
SO
122
70
108
127
107
126
56
60
107
N/A
63
88
100
83
N/A
96
105
99
101
90
N/A - Not available due to tube breakage or sampling problem
Condition 1 tubes were not spiked with surrogates
A4-52
-------
TABLE 4-13. VOST LABORATORY CONTROL SPIKE RESULTS
Compounds
(Condition 1)
Vinyl chloride
Methylene chloride
trans-1 ,2-Oichloroethene
cis-1 ,2-Dichloroethene
Chloroform
1,1,1 -Trichloroethane
Carbon tetrachloride
Benzene
1 ,2-Dtehloroethane
Trichloroetnene
Toluene
1.1,2-Trichloroethane
Tetrachloroethene
1 ,2-Oibromethane
Chlorobenzene
Ethylbenzene
m-/p-Xylene
o-Xylene
1 ,3-Oichlorobenzene
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
1 ,2-Oichlorobenzene
Laboratory
spike
(pg)
250
260
270
280
250
260
270
280
250
260
250
250
250
260
250
250
480
250
230
230
250
Spike
recovery
(%)
100
104 -
108
112
100
104
108
112
100
104
100
100
100
104
100
100
96
100
92
92
100
Spike
duplicate
(ng)
240
260
280
280
250
260
270
240
240
270
250
250
240
270
240
250
460
220
160
150
140
Spike
duplicate
recovery
- (%)
96
104
112
112
100
104
108
96
96
108
100
100
96
108
96
100
92
88
64
60
56
Relative
percent
difference
(%)
2.0
0.0
1.8
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
7.7
2.0
1.9
0.0
0.0
2.0
1.9
2.0
0.0
2.1
6.4
17.9
21.1
28.2
pa.
50
50
50
50
50
50
SO
50
50'
50
50
50
50
50
50
100
50
50
50
50
50
POL Practical quantrtation limit
A4-53
-------
TABLE 4-13. VOST LABORATORY CONTROL SPIKE RESULTS
(continued)
Compounds
(Condition 3, Run 2)
Vinyl chloride
Methylene chloride
trans-1 ,2-Dichloroethene
cis-1 ,2-Dichloroethene
Chloroform
1 ,1 ,1 -Trichloroethane
Carbon tetrachloride
Benzene
1,2-Dichloroethane
Trichloroethene
Toluene
1 , 1 ,2-Trichloroethane
Tetrachloroethene
1 ,2-Oibromethane
Chlorobenzene
Ethylbenzene
m-/p-Xylene
o-Xylene
1 ,3-Dichlorobenzene
1 ,4-Oichlorobenzene
1 ,2-Oichlorobenzene
Laboratory
spike
frg)
238
258
251
260
259
283
260
2461
163
360
436
214
274
217
249
252
537
246
215
227
197
Spike
recovery
(%)
95
104
100;
104
104.
113^
124
984
es;
144|
175;
86
110
87
99
10%
107
98
86
91
79
Spike
duplicate
-------
TABLE 4-13. VOST LABORATORY CONTROL SPIKE RESULTS
(continued)
Compounds
(Condition 3, Run 3)
Vinyl chloride
Methyleno chloride
trans- 1 ,2-Dichloroethene
cis-1 ,2-Dichloroethene
Chloroform
1,1,1 -Trichloroethane
Carbon tetrachloride
Benzene
1 ,2-Dichloroethane
Trichloroethene
Toluene
1,1,2-Trichloroethane
Tetrachloroethene
1,2-Oibromethane
Chlorobenzene
Ethylbenzene
m-/p-Xylene
o-Xylene
1 ,3-Dichlorobenzene
1 ,4-Dichlorobenzane
1 ,2-Dichlorobenzene
Laboratory
spike
(ng)
250
260
270
280
250
260
270
280
250
260
250
250
250
260
250
250
480
250
230
230
250
Spike
recovery
(%)
88
93
90
92
94
94
91
285
103
88
103
97
101
96
99
96
101
94
51
49
31
Spike
duplicate
("9)
240
260
280
280
250
260
270
240
240
270
250
250
240
270
240
250
460
220
160
150
140
Spike
duplicate
recovery
(%)
81
104
97
99
99
103
102
165
106
92
102
98
99
100
103
101
107
102
110
113
92
Relative
percent
difference
(%)
8
5
7
7
5
": §
'•11
53
3
4
1
1
2
4
4
4
6
8
73
. 79
99
pa.
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
50 '
50
50
50
SCI
50
50
50
50
50
POL Practical quantitation limit
A4-55
-------
TABLE A4-14. SS16 VOC AUDIT RESULTS
Compound
Vinyl chloride
Methylene chloride
Chloroform
Carbon tetrachtoride
Benzene
Toluene
Tetrachloroethene
Tube 1 (ng)
ALR 47.14
BQL 0.373
ALR 37.96
10.6
ALR 31.91
1.42
8.19
Tube 2 (ng)
ALR 43.32
BQL 0.345
ALR 41.58
11.73
ALR 34.66
0.808
8.98
Average (ng)
ALR 45.23
BQL 0.359
ALR 39.77
11.165
ALR 33.285
1.114
8.585
RPD (%)
8.45
9.10
10.12
8.26
9.20
EPA true value (ng)
19.6
...
33.8
9.1
27.5
...
10.2
EPA reported bias (%)
130.77
...
17.66
22.69
21.04
...
-15.83
ALR - Above linear range
BQL - Below quantitation limit
Average
9.03
35.26
-------
TABLE A4-15. SS16 METALS FIELD BLANK AND PROOF RESULTS
Metal
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Beryllium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Phosporus
Selenium
Silver
Thalium
Tin
Zinc
Field blank
Condition 1 Run 3
Front half
14.00
ND 10.00
4.30
ND 0.10
ND 1.00
1.70
2.60
9.60
ND 1 .00
ND 0.02
ND 1.00
10.00
ND 10.00
1 .50
ND 10.00
74.00
11.00
Back half
ND 10.00
ND 10.00
ND 1.00
ND 1.00
ND 1.00
ND 1.00
ND 1.00
ND 5.00
ND 1.00
ND 0.02
ND 1.00
ND 10.00
ND 10.00
ND 1.00
ND 10.00
ND 10.00
9.00
Original proof TCT
Front half
ND 10.00
ND 10.00
ND 1 .00
ND 0.10
ND 1 .00
ND 1.00
ND 1.00
ND 5.00
ND 1.00
ND 0.09
ND 1.00
NA — •
ND 10.00
ND 1.00
ND 10.00
NA —
1.10
Back half
ND 10.00
ND 10.00
ND 1.00
ND 1.00
ND 1 .00
ND 1.00
1.40
ND 5.00
1.10
ND 0.01
ND 1 .00
NA — -
ND 10.00
ND 1.00
ND 10.00
NA • —
ND 1.00
Mercury results
Fourth impinger
KMnO4 catch
HCI rinse
Field
blank
ND 0.02
ND 0.09
ND 0.03
Original
proof
TCT
ND 0.2
ND 0.2
1.3
Proof #1
TCT
ND 0.2
1.4
Proof #2
TCT
ND 0.2
5.1
Finai
proof
CEL
ND 20
ND 20
All results in micrograms
ND - Not detected; PQL reported
NA • Not available
TCT - Twin City Testing
CEL - Calscience Laboratories
A4-57
-------
TABLE A4-16. METALS FIELD BLANK RESULTS AS A PERCENTAGE OF THE INDIVIDUAL RUNS
Front
half
Antimony
Barium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Pnosporus
Silver
Tin
Zinc
held
blank
H9
14.0
4.3
1.7
2.6
9.7
10.0
1.5
74.0
11.0
C1 R1
ug |FB%
15.0 93
6.7 64
2.2 77
4.1 63
24.0 40
ND 100
NO 150
ND 740
81.0 14
C1 R2
ug I FB%
ND 140
2.7 159
1.8 94
1.5 173
7.9 123
ND 100
ND 150
ND 740
26.0 42
C1 R3
ug |FB%
15.0 93
5.7 75
2.6 65
3.6 72
16.0 61
14.0 71
ND 150
ND 740
30.0 37
C3 R1
us |FB%
11.0 127
4.0 108
1.8 94
3.4 76
11.0 88
13.0 77
ND 150
ND 740
52.0 21
C3 R2
ug !FB%
13.0 108
3.9 110
4.9 35
5.0 52
12.0 81
17.0 59
ND 150
ND 740
25.0 44
C3 R3
uq FB%
15.0 93
4.9 88
2.4 71
5.1 51
15.0 65
17.0 59
ND 150
ND 740
210 5
C2 R1
ug !FB%
13.0 108
5.6 77
2.5 68
6.6 39
16 61
ND 100
ND 150
13 569
32 63
C2 R2
ug FB%
14.0 100
4.2 102
5.1 33
3.8 68
20 49
ND 100
ND 150
ND 740
20 100
Back
half
Zinc
Field
blank
ug
9.0
C1 R1
ug |FB%
14^0 64
C1 R2
ug |FB%
8.2 110
C1 R3
ug |FB%
4.5 200
C3 R1
ug |FB%
4.8 188
C3 R2
ug |FB%
12.0 75
C3 R3
ug I FB%
14.0 64
Front half & back half recovered together for Condition 2.
Front half field blank percentage for zinc is calculated from the sum of the front half and back half results.
ND - Not detected
-------
TABLE A4-17. SS16 METALS DUPLICATE
Metal
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Beryllium
Cadmium
Copper
Chromium
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Silver
Thallium
Zinc
C2R2-SS16
F. H., Filter,
andB. H.
(ug)
14
ND
4.2
ND
2.6
3.8
5.1
20
2.0
ND
2.4
ND
ND
ND
20
C2R2-SS16
F. H., Filter,
andB. H.
duplicate
(ug)
13
ND
4.3
ND
3.4
3.7
4.8
ND
ND
ND
2.2
ND
ND
ND .
19
Average
(ug)
15.5
...
4.25
...
3.0
3.75
4.95
...
„«,.
'.~
2.3
~.
.0.
...
19.5
Relative
%
difference
(%)
7.4
.=.
2.3
...
26
2.6
16.0
...
.=.
— .
.8.6
...
...
.„.
5.1
PQL
(ug)
10.0
10.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
5.0
1.0
0.04
1.0
10.0
10.0
10.0
1.0
PQL - Pratical quantitation limit
ND- Not detected
A4-59
-------
TABLE A4-18. SS16 HCI QA RESULTS
QA description
Glassware proof
Audit samples
High
1:25 dilution
1:50 dilution
Low
1:25 dilution
1:50 dilution
Capture efficiency
Imp. 1 & 2
Imp. 3
Reid blank
Duplicate
C1R3
C3R3
Results
NO 1800
"9
24 mg/l
12 mg/l
1.9 mg/l
0.92 mg/l
NO 2000
ng
NO 640
ng
NO 4.1 ng
[
NO —
4.4% RPD
Comments
CK
passed criteria
passed criteria
passed criteria
passed criteria
not detected
not detected
not detected
not detected
within criteria
RPD Relative percent difference
A4-60
-------
TABLE A4-19. STRATIFICATION CHECK
Point
1
2
3
4
Five minute average
NOx O2
54.4
55.7
56.0
55.6
Average 55.40
8.77
8.40
8.41
8.40
8.50
Time
16:25-16:30
16:30-16:35
16:35-16:40
16:40=16:45
Percent difference
NOx O2
-1.8
0.54
1.1
0.36
3.18
-1.18
-1.06
-1.18
TABLE A4-20. RESPONSE TIMES (TO 95% OF SPAN)
Gas
O2
CO2
CO
R.T.
(min.)
<1
<1
<1
Gas
NOx
THC
S02
R.T.
(min.)
<1
<1
>40
A4-61
-------
TABLE A4-21. OXYGEN DILUTION CHECK OF ALL STACK PORTS
Port sampled
GEM port
Metals port
OEM port
Organics port
OEM port
VOSTport
OEM port
HCI port
OEM port
Pilot port
OEM port
Sample time
13:02-13:06
13:07-13:12
13:15-13:23 '
13:24-13:28
13:29-13:33
13:34-13:39
13:40-13:49
13:50-13:54
13:55 - 14:04
14:05-14:13
14:14-14:18
Average 02
7.51
7.11
7.46
8.82
7.28
7.02
6.91
8.34
7.22
7.92
7.51
Port sampled
Metals
Organics
VOST
HCI
Pilot
Average OEM
port O2
7.49
7.37
7.10
7.07
7.37
Average port
02
7.11
8.82
7.02
8.34
7.92
Percenl
difference
-5.07
19.7
-1.1
18
7.46
-------
TABLE A4-22. CYCLONIC FLOW CHECK
Traverse
point
A1
A2
A3
A4
81
B2
B3
B4
dP
(inches H20)
0.005
0.005
0.01
0.015
0.02
0.01
0.015
0.01
Swirl angle
(degrees)
5
6
4
7
6
S
4
3
Average
A4-63
-------
TABLE A4-23. INTERNAL STANDARD RECOVERY SUMMARY FOR PCB
MEASUREMENTS IN PROCESS GAS SAMPLES
Sample
10
SS6
Condition 2
Run 2
SS7
Condition 2
Run 2
SS9
Condition 1
Run 2
Condition 2
Run 2
Condition 3
Run 1
SSU
Condition 1
Run1
Run 2
Run 3
Condition 2
Run 1
Run 2
Condition 3
Run 1
Run 2
Run 3
INTERNAL STANDARD RECOVERY (%)
3434-1 3C PCB
92.30
I
63.60
123.00
55.90
55.90
197.00
56.80
206.00
N/A;
71.40
51.00
N/A
280.00
223355661 3C PCB
86.70
63.30
69.80
51.90
56.50
88.80
41.40
76.00
N/A
20.20
70.20
N/A
99.80
N/A • Not available
A4-64
-------
TABLE A4-24. INTERNAL STANDARD RECOVERY SUMMARY FOR PCDD/PCDF MEASUREMENTS I
GAS SAMPLES
!PROCESS
SAMPLE ID
SS14
Condition 1
Run1
Run 2
Run3
Average
R8D %
Condition 2
Runl
Run 2
Average
Dev. %
Conditions
Run 1
Run 2
Run 3
Average •
RSD%
SS19
Condition 2
Runl
Run 2
Average
RPD
INTERNAL STANDARD RECOVERY (%)
13C12-
2.3.7,8-
TCDD
98.6
63.8
109
90.47
26.17
65.9
90.6
78.25
31.57
68.2
68.6
104
80.27
25.61
48.4
77.3
62.85
45.98
13C12-
1.2.3.7,8-
PeCDD
99.8
90
113
100.93
11.44
47.4
43.8
. 45.60
7.89
101
82.4
121
101.47
19.03
69
176
122.50
87.35
13C12-
1,2.3.6.7.8-
HxCDD
56.7
26.2
98
60.30
59.76
64.1
49.6
56.85
25.51
73.3
69.5
77.9
73.57
5.72
47
68.4
57.70
. 37.09
13C12-
1.2.3,4.6.7,8-
HpCDD
96.7
67.7
130
98.13
31.77
57.1
73.2
65.15
24.71
66.5
74.3
76.4
72.40
7.20
39.6
57.7
48.65
37.20
13C12-
OCDD
96.5
64
116
92.17
28.50
39.5
45.8
42.65
14.77
42
60.8
51.7
51.50
18.26
42.7
43.5
43.10
1.86
13C12-
2.3.7.8-
TCDF
101
53.9
116
90.30
35.88
69.5
94.4
81.95
30.38
70.7
68.7
93.6
77.67
17.81
54.1
110
82.05
68.13
13C12-
1,2.3.7,8-
PeCDF
98.7
22.5
74.8
65.33
59.65
49.4
48.3
48.85
2.25
75.4
53.3
65.4
64.70
17.10
57
62.5
59.75
9.21
13C12-
1.2.3.6.7.8-
HxCDF
9.5
1.4
27.9
12.93
105.00
20
6.3
13.15
104.18
45.1
20.1
17.4
27.53
55.47
65
56.9
60.95
13.29
13C12-
1.2.3.4,6.8,9-
HpCDF
16.7
1.38
45.5
21.19
105.70
43.6
27.4
15.5
28.83
48.92
34.9
34.90
200.00
-------
TABLE A4-25. INTERNAL STANDARD RECOVERY SUMMARY FOR CHLOROBENZENE AND CHLOROPHENOL
MEASUREMENTS IN PROCESS GAS SAMPLES
Sample
ID
SS6
Condition 2
Run 2
SS7
Condition 2
Run 2
SS9
Condition 1
Run 2
Condition 3
Run1
Condition 2
Run1
SS14
Condition 1
Run1
Run 2
Run 3
Average
RSD%
Condition 3
Run1
Run 2
Run 3
Average
RSD%
Condition 2
Run 1
Run 2
Average
RSD%
SS19
Condition 2
Run 1
Run 2
Average
RPD%
INTERNAL STANDARD RECOVERY (%)
Pheno!-D5
205.5
75.8
40.4
52.3
58.6
5742.0
t74.4
0.0
1972.1
165.6
90.2
46.4
41.1
59.2
45.5
64.3
58.0
61.2
7.3
33.40
56.50
45.0
51.4
1 ,4-dibromobenzene-D4
86.1
80.5
88.3
74.1
57.0
9019.0
33.3
19.3
3023.9
171.7
NA
NA
54.2
54.2
N/A
28.5
41.3
34.9
25.9
89.70
52.80
71.3
51.8
Nitrobenzene-DS
95.4
89.2
64.9
70.4
. 63.4
0.0
0.0
12.1
4.0
173.2
NA
NA
48.7
. 48.7
N/A
81.4 .
38.9
60.2
50.0
208.2
131.1
169.7
45.4
2-lluorobipheny!
77.2
78.3
68.5
80.5
70.3
89.3
95.2
69.1
84.5
16.2
104.6
109.5
66.6
93.6
25.1
68.0
55.6
61.8
14.2
105.7
60.9
83.3
53.8
1 ,3,5-trichlorobenzene-D3
83.0
80.5
79.4
52.2
58.3
111.5
55.7
83.4
83.5 .
33.4
NA
NA
40.9
40.9
N/A
88.9
29.0
59.0
71.9
102.5
65.4
84.0
44.2
-------
TABLE A4-26. ALTERNATE STANDARD RECOVERY SUMMARY FOR PCDD
AND PCDF MEASUREMENTS IN PROCESS GAS SAMPLES
Sample
ID
SS14
Condition 1
Run 1
Run 2
Run 3
Average
RSD %
Condition 3
Run 1
Run 2
Run 3
Average
RSD %
Condition 2
Run 1
Run 2
Average
Dev. %
SS19
Condition 2
Run 1
Run 2
Average
RPD
ALTERNATE STANDARD RECOVERY (%)
13C12-1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDF
83.6
85.5
97.3
88.80
8.36
75.5
85.3
87.1
82.63
7.55
87.5
85.9
86.70
1 .85
35
61.8
48.40
55.37
13C12-2,3f4,6I7,8-HxCDF
92
73
106
90.33
18.34
83
97
83.5
87.83
9.04
81.4
79.6
80.50
2.24
50.4
60.2
55.30
17.72
RPD • Relative percent difference
A4-67
-------
TABLE A4-27. ALTERNATE STANDARD RECOVERY SUMMARY FOR
POLYCHLOROBIPHENYL MEASUREMENTS IN PROCESS GAS SAMPLES
Sample
ID
SS14
Condition 1
Run1
Run 2
RunS
Average
RSD%
Condition 3
Run1
Run 2
RunS
Average
RPD %
SS14
Condition 2
Run 1
Run 2
ALTERNATE STANDARD RECOVERY (%)
224455-1 3CHEXA
69.00
38.20
49.40
52.20
29.87
56.00
i «_
56.80
56.40
1 .42
—
; 23.60
A4-68
-------
TABLE A4-28. SURROGATE SPIKE RECOVERY SUMMARY FOR PCDD AND PCDF MEASUREMENTS
IN PROCESS GAS SAMPLES
Sample
ID
SS14
Condition 1
Run1
Run 2
Run 3
Average
RSD %
Condition 3
Run 1
Run 2
Run 3
Average
RSD %
Condition 2
Run1
Run 2
Average
RPD%
SS19
Condition 2
Run 1
Run 2
Average
RPD %
SURROGATE RECOVERY (%)
37CI-2.3.7.8-TCDD
98.1
112
113
107.70
7.73
71.2
80
88.2
79.80
10.65
124
102
113.00
19.47
172
332
252.00
63.49
•\3C\2-2.3 AJ,B-PeCDF
96.3
505
145
248.77
89.74
84.7
83.2
144
103.97
33.35
113
116
114.50
2.62
74.7
80.7
77.70
7.72
13CI2-1.2,3,4,7,8-HxCDF
79.8
93.5
105
92.77
13.60
53.4
22.7
89.6
55.23
60.63
113
122
117.50
7.66
104
114
109.00
9.17
13CI2-1.2.3.4.7.8-HXCDD
130
161
123
138.00
14.65
102
98.9
107
102.63
3.98
124
114
119.00
8.40
156
133
144.50
15.92
1 3CI2-1 ,2.3,4.7,8.9-HpCDF
493
4410
225
1709.33
137.05
63.3
74.9
80.5
72.90
12.03
575
984
779.50
52.47
214
214.00
200.00
-------
TABLE A4-29. VOC SURROGATE RECOVERIES IN PROCESS GAS SAMPLES
Sample
location
SS6
SS7
SS9
SS14
881 9
Test condition
Condition 2
Condition 2
Condition 3
Condition 2
Condition 1
Condition 3
Condition 2
Condition 2
Run
*
Run 3
Run 1
Run 2
Run 3
Run 1
Run1
Run1
Run 1
Tube ID
Bag
Tube 1 & 2
Tube 3 & 4
Tube 5 & 6
Tube7&8
Tube 1 & 2
Tube 3 & 4
Tubes & 6
Tube 7 & 8
Tube 1 & 2
Tube3 & 4
Tube 5 & 6
Tube 7 & 8
Tube 1 & 2
Tube 3 & 4
Tube 5 & 6
Tube 7 & 8
Tube 1 & 2
Tube3&4
Tube 1 & 2
Tube 3 & 4
Tube 5 & 6
Tube 7 & 8
Tube 1 & 2
Tube 3 & 4
Tube 5 & 6
Tube 1 & 2
Tube 3 & 4
Tube 5 & 6
Tube 7 & 8
Tube 1 & 2
Tube 3 & 4
Tube 5 & 6
Tube 7 & 8
Tube 9 & 10
Tube 11 &12
Tube1&2
Tube 3 & 4
Tube 5 & 6
Tube 7 & 8
Tube 1 & 2
Tube 3 & 4
Tube 5 & 6
Tube 7 & 8
Surrogate Recoveries (%)
1 ,2-dichloroethane-d4
49
83
84
91
90
70
72
63
70
100
94
95
1O1
139
i 4300
27000
0
! N/A
0
N/A
0
N/A
0
7279
1309
3984
85
80
! 83
80
85
! 90
86
.97
92
85
INT
INT
INT
INT
; INT
INT
INT
INT
toluene-d8
98
98
93
99
99
93
94
94
93
112
108
112
120
235
161
100
186
N/A
0
N/A
1664
N/A
49
93
9
100
96
94
98
105
110
110
104
102
112
105
INT
INT
INT
INT
157
50
74
40
4-bromofluorobenzene
100
128
103
129
121
147
143
129
139
138
119
137
128
88
244
520
147
N/A
88
N/A
41
N/A
196
558
580
185
116
50
122
70
108
127
107
126
56
60
204
142
0
INT
99
3
17
ND
N/A - Not applicable
NO - Not detected
INT - Matrix interferences resulted in inability to quantify surrogates.
A4-70
-------
TABLE A4-30. FIXED GASES AUDIT SAMPLE
Analyte
Hydrogen (Hg)
Oxygen (O2)
Nitrogen (Ng)
Methane (CH4)
Carbon monoxide (CO)
Carbon dioxide (COg)
Audit Value
—
12
—
—
0.6
7
-
Analysis Concentration
ND
11.8
81.1
ND
0.57
.6.08
ND - Not Detected
A4-71
-------
TABLE A4-31. SS1-WASTE WATER FIELD BLANK RESULTS
Compound
Volatile organic compounds (VOC)
Chlorophenols (CP)
*
Chlorobenzenes (CB)
Anaiyte
Vinyl chloride
Methyl chloride
Trans-1 ,2-dichloroethene
Cis-1 ,2-dk:hloroethene
Chloroform
1,1,1 -Trichloroethane
Carbon tetrachloride
Benzene
1 ,2-Oichloroethane
Trichloroethene
Toluene :
1 ,2,3-Trtehloroethane
Tetrachloroethene
1 ,2-Dibromoethane
Chlorobenzene
Ethylbenzene ;
m-p-Xylene
o-Xylene ;
1 ,3-Oichlorobenzene
1 ,4-Dichlorobenzene
1 ,2-Dichorobenzene
2,3-Dichlorophenol
2,4-DichlorophanoI
2,5-Dichlorophenol
2,6-Oichlorophenol
3,4-Dichlorophenol
3,5-Dichlorophenol
Total dichlorophenols
2,3,4-Trichlorophenol
2,3,5-Trichlorophenol
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol
Total trichlorophenols
2,3,4,5* and/or 2,3,4,6- Tetrachlorophenol
2,3,5,6-Tetraehlorophenol
Total totrachlorophenols
Pentachlorophenol
1 ,2-Dichlorobenzene
1 ,3-Dichlorobenzene
1 ,4-Dichlorobenzene
Total dichlorobenzenes
1 ,2,3-Trtchlorobenzene
1 ,3,5-Trichlorobenzene
1 ,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
Total tetrachlorobenzene
1 ,2,3,5- and/or 1 ,2,4,5-Tetrachlofobenzene
Total totrachlorobenzenes
Pentachlorobenzene
Hexachlorobenzene
Units
H9/L
ug/L
ra/L
ng/L
ng/L
H9/L
ng/L
ng/L
ug/L
H9/L
ng/L
ng/L
jtg/L
|ig/L
jig/L
jig/L '
fig/L
jig/L
jig/L
>&g/L
jig/L
H9A-
H9/L
H9/L
ng/L
V&L
gg/L
ng/L
H9/L
H9/L
Jig/L
jig/L
jig^-
ng/L
R9/L
^g/L
R9^-
jig^-
ng/L
^g/L
ng>L
fig/L
ng/L
H9/L
ng/L
H9/L
H9/L
ttg/L
ResutJ
ND
NO
ND
ND
ND
ND
BQL
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
2
2
2
' 2
20
2
2
5
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
12.00
12.00
12.00
12.00
12.00
12.00
12.00
12.00
12.00
12.00
12.00
12.00
12.00
12.00
12.00
12.00
12.00
12.00
12.00
12.00
12.00
12.00
12.00
24.00
12.00
12.00
12.00
A4-72
-------
TABLE A4-31. SS1-WASTE WATER FIELD BLANK RESULTS
(continued)
Compound
Polycyclc aromatic hydrocarbons (PAH)
-
Density
I olal organic carbon
pR
Total sulfur (as S)
Organic halogens (as chloride)
Inorganic halogens (as chloride)
PCDD/PCDF
Analyte
Acenaphthene
Fluorene
Phenanthrene
Anthracene
Fluoranthene
Pyrene
Benz (a) anthracene
Chrysene
Berizo (b) fluoranthene
Benzo (k) fluoranthene
Benzo (e) pyrene
Benzo (a) pyrene
Perylene
Indeno (1 ,2,3-cd) pyrene
Dibenz (a,h) anthracene
Benzo (g,h,i) perylene
Naphthalene
2-Methylnaphthalene
2-Chloronaphthalene
Acenaphthlene
2378 TCDD
12378PeCDD
1 23478 HxCDD
1 23678 HxCDD
123789 HxCDD
1 234678 HpCDD
OCDD
2378 TCDF
12378PeCDF
23478 PeCDF
1 23478 HxCDF
123678 HxCDF
234678 HxCDF
123789 HxCDF
1234678 HpCDF
1 234789 HpCDF
OCDF
Total TCDD
Total PeCDD
Total HxCDD
Total HpCDD
Total TCDF
Total PeCDF
Total HxCDF
Units
H9/L
ng/L
tig/L
jig/L
fig/L
H9/L
HS/L
H9/L
jig/L
ng/L
ng/L
MI/L
Jig/L
ng/L
jig/L
ng/L
\ig/L
ng/L
jig/L
ng/L
g/cc
mg/L
PH
%
U9/L
mg/L;
ng/L
ngA.
ng/L
ng/L
ng/L
ng/L
ng/L
ng/L
ng/L
ng/L
ng/L
ng/L
ng/L ',
ng/L
ng/L
ng/L
ng/L
ng/L
ng/L
ng/L
ng/L
ng/L
ng/L
ng/L
Result
MD
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
F
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
F
F
ND
ND
9.90
9.90
9.90
9.90
9.90
9.90
9.90
9.90
9.90
9.90
9.90
9.90
9.90
9.90
9.90
9.90
9.90
9.90
9.90
9.90
0.96
1.92
6
0.018
13.1
0.1
0.0100
0.0069
0.0020
0.0031
0.0063
0.0059
0.0620
0.0067
0.0110
0.0032
0.0029
0.0016
0.0050
0.0019
0.0044
0.0039
0.0089
0.2000
0.0966
0.0032
0.0093
0.2546
0.1988
0.0050
A4-73
-------
TABLE A4-31. SS1-WASTE WATER FIELD BLANK RESULTS
(continued)
Compound
PCDD/PCDF (continued)
Potychlorinated biphenyls (PCS)
Hexavalent chromium
Metals
•
Analyte
Total HpCDF
Total PCDD (by isomer)
Total PCDF (by isomer)
Total PCDD/PCDF (by isomer)
Total PCDD :
Total PCDF
Total PCDD/PCDF
Total monochlorobiphenyls
Total dichlorobiphenyls
Total trichlorobiphanyls
Total tetrachlorobiphenyls
Total pentachlorobiphenyls
Total hexachlorobiphenyls
Total heptachlorobiphenyls
Total octachlorobiphenyls
Total nonachlorobiphenyls
Total decachlorobiphenyls
Ag
As
Ba
Be
Cd
Cr
Cu
Hg
Mn
Ni
P
Pb
Sb
Se
Sn
Tl
Zn
Units
ng/L
ng/L
ng/L
ng/L
ng/L
ng/L
ng/L
«I/L
ng/L
ng/L
ng/L
ng/L
ng/L
ng/L
ns/L
nS/L
ns/L
mg/L
HS/L
ng/L
ng/L
ng/L
ng/L
nS/L
ng/L
ng/L
ng/L
ng/L
ng/L
ng/L
ns/L
ng/L
ng/L
l*g/L
ng/L
Result
<
<
f
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.0029
0.0342
0.0495
0.0837
0.391 1
0.4702
0.8613
0.34
1.4
2.7
i.5
10
9.5
8.2
4.1
1
0.57
0.001
10
100
10
10
10
10
10
0.2
10
10
100
50
100
too
100
100
10
BQL-Below quanrtation limits
ND-Non detect
A4-74
-------
TABLE A4-32. SS10-TREATED SOIL FIELD BLANK
Compound
Volatile organic compounds (VOC)
0
Chlorophenols (CP)
Chlorobenzenes (CB)
Analyte
Vinyl chloride
Methyl chloride
Trans-1 ,2-dichloroethene
Cis-1 ,2-dichloroethene
Chloroform
1,1,1-Trichloroethane
Carbon tetrachloride
Benzene
1 ,2-DichIoroethane
Trichloroethene
Toluene
1 ,1 ,2-Trichloroethane
Tetrachloroethene
1,2-Dibromoethane
Chlorobenzene
Ethylbenzene
m-p-Xylena
o-Xylene
1 ,3-Oichlorobenzene
1 ,4-Dichlorobenzene
1 ,2-Dichlorobenzene
2,3-Dichlorophenol
2,4-Dichlorophenol
2,5-Dichlorophenol
2,6-Dichlorophenol
3,4-Dichlorophenol
3,5-Oichlorophenol
Total dichlorophenols
2,3,4-Trichlorophenol
2,3,5-Trichlorophenol
2,3,6-Trichlorophenol
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol
Total trichlorophenols
2,3,4,5- and/or 2,3,4,6-Tetrachlorophenol
2,3,5,6-Tetrachlorophenol
Total tetrachlorophenols
Pentachlorophenol
1 ,2-Dichlorobenzene
1 ,3-Dichlorobenzene
1 ,4-Dichlorobenzene
Total dichlorobenzenes
1 ,2,3-Trichlorobenzene
1 ,3,5-Trichlorobenzene
1 ,2,4-Trichlorbenzene
Total trichlorobenzenes
1 ,2,3,4-Tetrachlorobenzene
1 ,2,3,5-and/or 1 ,2,4,5-Tetrachlorobenzenes
Total tetrachlorobenzenes
'entachlorobenzene
-fexachlorobenzene
Units
Mg/kg
ng/kg
Hg/kg
jig/kg
yg/kg
jig/kg
ng/kg
Jig/kg
jig/kg
jig/kg
Jig/kg
ng/kg
ng/kg
US/kg
fig/kg
ng/kg
jig/kg
jtg/kg
fig/kg
jig/kg
ng/kg
ng/kg
tig/kg
ng/kg
jig/kg
(ig/kg
ng/kg
>ig/kg
tig/kg
ng/kg
ng/kg
jig/kg
ng/kg
jig/kg
Jig/kg
ng/kg
fig/kg
ng/kg
ng/kg
Jtg/kg
ug/kg
Jig/kg
ttg^g
jig/kg
^g/kg
^g/kg
Hg/kg
jig/kg
w/kg
(tg/kg
jig/kg
Result
r^D
ND
ND
NO
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
SQL
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
4
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
33.00
33.00
33.00
33.00
33.00
33.00
198.00
33.00
33.00
33.00
33.00
33.00
165.00
613.00
33.00
99.00
33.00
33.00
33.00
33.00
99.00
33.00
33.00
33.00
99.00
33.00
66.00
99.00
33.00
330.00
A4-75
-------
TABLE A4-32. SS10-TREATED SOIL FIELD BLANK
(continued)
Compound
Potycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAH)
"
*
Ash
Total organic carbon
Total sulfur (as S)
Total halogens (as chlorine)
PCDD/PCDF
Analyte
Acenaphthene
Fluorene
Phenanthrene
Anthracene
Fluoranthene
Pyrene
Benz (a) anthracene
Chrysene
Benzo (b) fluoranthene
Benzo (k) fluoranthene
Benzo (e) pyrene
Benzo (a) pyrene
Perylene
Indeno (1,2,3-cd) pyrene
Benzo (g.h.i) perylene
Naphthalene
2-Mathylnaphthalene
2-Chloronap hthalene
Acenaphthlene
2378 TCDD !
12378PeCDD
123478 HxCDD
123678 HxCDD
123789 HxCDD
1 234678 HpCDD
OCDD
2378 TCDF
12378PeCDF
23478 PeCDF
1 23478 HxCDF
1 23678 HxCDF
234678 HxCDF
123789 HxCDF
1234678 HpCDF
1 234789 HpCDF
OCDF
Total TCDD
Total PeCDD
Total HxCDD
Total HpCDD
Total TCDF
Total PeCDF
Total HxCDF
Total HpCDF
Total PCDD (by isomer)
" otal PCDF (by isomer)
Units
no/kg
Jig/kg
jig/kg
jig/kg
ng/kg
ng/kg
ng/kg
us/kg
jig/kg
Jig/kg
ng/kg
jig/kg
fig/kg
ng/kg
ng/kg
US/kg
jig/kg
ng/kg
ng/kg
%
mg/kg
%
%
ng/kg
ng/kg
ng/kg
ng/kg
ng/kg
ng/kg
ng/kg
ng/kg
ng/kg
ng/kg
ng/kg
ng/kg
ng/kg
ng/kg
ng/kg
ng/kg
ng/kg
ng/kg
ng/kg
ng/kg
ng/kg
ng/kg
ng/kg
ng/kg
ng/kg
ng/kg
ng/kg
Result
NO
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
<
<
33.00
33.00
33.00
33.00
33.00
33.00
33.00
33.00
33.00
33.00
33.00
33.00
33.00
33.00
33.00
33.00
33.00
33.00
33.00
0.99
105
<0.01
0.16
4.70
3.10
0.79
1.20
1.00
4.20
8.30
2.70
5.70
2.70
0.94
0.61
1.20
.1.10
1.60
2.00
7.50
103.40
43.40
9.97
8.40
102.60
117.60
15.40
7.20
14.99
26.05
A4-76
-------
TABLE A4-32. SS10-TREATED SOIL FIELD BLANK
(continued)
Compound
PCDD/PCDF (continued)
Polychlorinated biphenols (PCS)
Hexavalent chromium
Metals
"
TCLP metals
Analyte
Total PCDD/PCDF (by isomer)
Total PCDD
Total PCDF
Total PCDD/PCDF
Total monochlorobiphenyls
Total dichlorobiphenyls
Total trichlorobiphenyls
Total tetrachlorobiphenyls
Total pentachlorobiphenyls
Total hexachlorobiphenyls
Total heptachfprobicphenyls
Total octachlorobiphenyls
Total nonachlorobiphenyls
Total decachiorobiphenyls
Ag
As
Ba
Be
Cd
Cr
Cu
Hg
Mn
Ni
P
Pb
Sb .
Se
Sn
Tl
Zn
Ag
As
Ba
Cd
Cr
Pb
Hg
Se
Units
no/kg
ng/kg
ng/kg
ng/kg
ng/kg
ng/kg
ng/kg
ng/kg
ng/kg
ng/kg
ns/kg
ng/kg
us/kg
ng/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
ng/L
(ig/L
ng/L
ng/L
jigA.
ng/L
jig/L
ng/L
Result
: <
<
<
<
KJD
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
NO
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
41.04
173.47
250.30
423.77
10.00
0.43
4.80
12.00
4.60
280.00
240.00
120.00
30.00
17.00
0.01
""CC74
7.4
0.74
0.07
0.74
0.74
0.74
0.15
0.74
0.74
7.4
3.7
7.4
7.4
7.4
7.4
0.74
100
1400
10
10
50
0.4
too
- 1.0
BQL-Below quanrtation limits
ND-Non detect
A4-77
-------
TABLE A4-33. SS1 FIELD SAMPLE DUPLICATE SUMMARY
PCB
SS1 - Condition 1
Total monochlorobiphenyls
Total dichtorobiphenyls
Total trichlorobiphenyls
Total tetrachlorobiphenyls
Total pentachtorobiphenyls
Total hexachtorobiphenyls
Total heptachtorobiphenyls
Total octachlorobiphenyls
Total nonachlorobiphenyls
Total decachlorobiphenyls
Minimum
Maximum
Average
SS1- Condition 3
• Total monochlorobiphenyls
Total dichtorobiphenyls
Total trichlorobiphenyls
Total tetrachlorobiphenyls
Total pentachtorobiphenyls
Total hexachtorobiphenyls
Total heptachtorobiphenyls
Total octachlorobiphenyls
Total nonachlorobiphenyls
Total decachlorobiphenyls
Minimum
Maximum
Field sample
(ppb)
ND
3.10
2.50
1.80
0.54
0.01
ND
ND
ND
ND
i
0.019
0.62
1.00
1.2
0.55 I
0.057
ND :
ND
ND
ND
Field sample
duplicate (ppb)
ND
2.90
2.20
1.60
0.47
0.02
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.018
0.61
1.00
1.3
0.5
0.052
ND
ND
ND
ND
Average (ppb)
N/A
3.00
2.35
1.70
0.51
0.02
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
On?
3/YI
1.51
0.02
.62
1.00
1.25
0.53
0.05
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
O.S8
difference
N/A
6.67
12.77
11.76
, 13.86
58.06
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
6 67
58 06
So^il
0.00
8.00
9.52
9.17
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
0 00
9 52
5.62
ND: Not detected
N/A: Not applicable
A4-78
-------
TABLE A4-33. SS1-FIELD SAMPLE DUPLICATE SUMMARY
(continued)
CB/CP
SS1
1 ,2-Dichlorobenzene
1 ,3-Dichlorobenzene
1 ,4-DichIorobenzene
Total dichlorobenzenes
1 ,2,3-Trichlorobenzene
1 ,3,5-Trichlorobenzene
1 ,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
Total trichlorobenzenes
1 ,2,3,4-TetrachIorobenzene
1 ,2,3,5- and/or 1 ,2,4,5-Tetrachlorc-
Total tetrachtorobenzenes
Pentachlorobenzene
H exachlorobenzene
2,3-Dichlorophenol
2,4-Dichtorophenol
2,5-Dichlorophenol
2,6-Dichlorophenol
3,4-Dichlorophenol
3,5-Dichtorophenol
Total dichlorophenols
2,3,4-Trtehlorophenol
2,3,5-Trichlorophenol
2,3,6-Trichlorophenol
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol
Total trichlorophenols
2,3,4,5,- and/or 2.3,4,6-Tetrachtoro-phenol
2,3,5,6-Tetrachlorophenol
Total tetrachlorophenols
Pentachtorophenol
Minimum
Maximum
Average : -
Field
sample
(PPb)
ND 1.20
ND 1.20
ND 1.20
ND
ND 1.20
ND 1.20
ND 1.20
ND
ND 1.20
ND 2.50
ND
ND 1.20
ND 1.20
ND 1.20
ND 1.20
ND 1.20
ND 1.20
ND 1.20
ND 1.20
ND
ND 1.20
ND 1.20
ND 1.20
ND 1.20
ND 1.20
ND
ND 2.50
ND 1.20
ND
ND 1.20
Fleia
sample
duplicate
(PPb)
ND 1.20
ND 1 .20
ID 1 .20
ID
ND 1.20
ND 1 .20
ND 1.20
ND
ND 1 .20
ND 2.50
ND
ND 1 .20
ND " 1 .20
ND 1.20
ND 1.20
ND 1 .20
ND 1.20
ND 1.20
ND 1.20
MD 1.20
ND 1 .20
ND 1.20
ND 1.20
ND 1.20
ND
ND 2.50
ND 1.20
ND
ND 1.20
Average
(PPb)
1.20
1.20
1.20
1.20
1.20
1.20
1.20
2.50
1.20
1.20
1.20
1.20
1.20
1.20
1.20
1.20
1.20
1.20
1.20
1.20
1.20
2.50
1.20
1.20
i.£U
2.50
1 ^1
i .0 1
Relative %
difference
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0/\rt
.00
OArt
.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0 00
v« w
Ortrt
•00
0.00
ND: Not detected
A4-79
-------
TABLE A4-33. SS-FIELD SAMPLE DUPLICATE SUMMARY
(continued)
PAH
SS1
Acenaphthene
Fluorene
Phenanthrene
Anthracene
Fluoranthene '
Pyrene
Benzo (a) anthracene
Chrysene
Benzo (b) fluoranthene
Benzo (k) fluoranthene
Benzo (e) pyrene
Benzo (a) pyrene
Perylene
Indeno (1 ,2,3-cd) pyrene
Dibenz (a,h) anthracene
Benzo (g.h.i) perylene
Naphthalene
2-MethyInaphthalene
2-Chloronaphthalene
Acenapthyiene
Minimum
Maximum
Average
SURROGATE RECOVERY
2-Ruorophenol
Phenol -d5
2-Chlorophenol -d4
1 ,2-Dichtorobenzene -d4
Nitrobenzene -d5
2-Fluorobiphenyl
2,4,6-Tribromophenol
TerphenyJ-d14
Minimum
Maximum
Average
Field sample
(ppb) ,
ND 9.90
ND 9.90
ND 9.90
ND 9.90
ND 9.90
ND 9.90
ND 9.90
ND 9.90 :
ND 9.90
ND 9.90
ND 9.90
ND 9.90
ND 9.90 c
ND 9.90
ND 9.90
ND 9.90
ND 9.90
ND 9.90
ND 9.90
ND 9.90 ,
[
44.00
34.00,
60.00
49.00
68.00
53.00
72.00
73.00
•
Field sample
duplicate
(ppb)
ND 9.80
ND 9.80
ND 9.80
ND 9.80
ND 9.80
ND 9.80
ND 9.80
ND 9.80
ND 9.80
ND 9.80
ND 9.80
ND 9.80
ND 9.80
ND 9.80
ND 9.80
ND 9.80
ND 9.80
ND 9.80
ND 9.80
ND 9.80
31.00
30.00
54.00
39.00
62.00
43.00
38.00
71.00
Average (ppt>)
9.85
9.85
9.85
9.85
9.85
9.85
9.85
9.85
9.85
9.85
9.85
9.85
9.85
9.85
9.85
9.85
9.85
9.85
9.85
9.85
9.85
9.85
9.85
37.50
32.00
57.00
44.00
65.00
48.00
55.00
72.00
32.00
72.00
51.31
Relative %
difference
1.02.
1.02
1.02
1.02
1.02
1.02
1.02
1.02
1.02
1.02
1.02
1.02
1.02
1.02
1.02
1.02
1.02
1.02
1.02
1.02
1.02
1.02
1.02
34.67
12.50
10.53
22.73
9.23
20.83
61.82
2.78
2.78
61.82
21.89
ND: Not detected
A4-80
-------
TABLE A4-33. SS1-FIELD SAMPLE DUPLICATE SUMMARY
(continued)
" 7<3C ~~~
SS1
Vinyl chloride
Methyl chloride
Trans-1 ,2-Dfchloroethene
Cis-1 ,2-Dichtoroethene
Chloroform
1 ,1 ,1 -Trichloroethane
Carbon Tetrachloride
Benzene
1 ,2-Dichloroethane
Trichloroethene
Toluene .
1 ,1 ,2-Trichloroethane
Tetrachloroethene
1 ,2-Dibromoethane
Chlorobenzene
Ethylbenzene
m-p-Xylene
o-Xylene
1 ,3-Dichlorobenzene
1 ,4-Dichlorobenzene
1 ,2-Oichlorobenzene
Minimum
Maximum
Average
FiiB —
sample
(ppb)
ND 2
14
ND 2
ND 2
ND 2
ND 2
ND 2
ND 2
ND 2
BQL 2
ND 2
ND 2
ND 2
ND 2
ND 2
ND 2
ND 2
ND 2
ND 2
ND 2
ND 2
Field sample
duplicate (ppb)
ND 2
13
ND 2
ND 2
ND 2
ND 2
ND 2
ND 2
ND 2
ND 2
BQL 3
ND 2
ND 2
ND 2
ND 2
ND 2
ND 2
ND 2
ND 2
ND 2
ND 2
Average
(ppb)
2.00
13.50
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
13.50
2.68
Relatively
difference
0.00
7.41
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
O.IDO
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
7.41
0.44
VOC
SSI
Total organic carbon
Organic halogens (as chloride)
Inorganic hatogens (as chloride)
Units
mg/L
ng/L
mg/L
Field
sample
8.86
136.00
1900.00
Field sample
duplicate
9.07
45900
1800
Average
8.97
23018.00
1850.00
Relative %
difference
2.34
198.82
5.41
ND: Not detected
BQL: Below quantitation limit
A4-81
-------
TABLE A4-34. SS2 FIELD SAMPLE DUPLICATE SUMMARY
PCB
SS2 - Condition 1
Total monochtorobiphenyls
Total dichtorobiphenyls
Total trichtorobiphenyls
Total tetrachtorobiphenyls
Total pentachtorobiphenyls
Total hexachlorobiphenyls
Total heptachtorobiphenyls
Total octachlorobiphenyls
Total nonachlorobiphenyls
Total decachlorobiphenyls
Minimum
Maximum
Average
SS2 - Condition 3
Total monochtorobiphenyls
Total dichtorobiphenyls
Total trichtorobiphenyls
Total tetrachlorobiphenyls
Total pentachtorobiphenyls
Total hexachlorobiphenyls
Total heptachtorobiphenyls
Total octachlorobiphenyls
Total nonachlorobiphenyls
Total decachtorobiphenyls
Minimum
Maximum
Average
Field sample (ppb)
260000.00
11000000.00
66000000.00
100000000.00
40000000.00
5000000.00
860000.00
230000.00
45000.00
NO
I
i
270000.00
12000000.00
75000000.00
110000000.00
43000000.00
5100000.00
800000.00
220000.00
41000.00
1200.00
Field sample
duplicate (ppb)
270000.00
12000000.00
71000000.00
120000000.00
43000000.00
4900000.00
830000.00
220000.00
43000.00
1300.00
290000.00
13000000.00
66000000.00
130000000.00
46000000.00
5500000.00
850000.00
230000.00
44000.00
1400.00
Average (ppb)
265000.00
11500000.00
68500000.00
110000000.00
41500000.00
4950000.00
845000.00
225000.00
44000.00
1300.00
1300.00
110000000.00
23783030.00
280000.00
12500000.00
70500000.00
120000000.00
44500000.00
5300000.00
825000.00
225000.00
42500.00
1300.00
1300.00
120000000.00
25417380.00
Relative %
difference
3.77
8.70
7.30
18.18
7.23
2.02
3.55
4.44
4.55
N/A
2.02
18.18
6.64
7.14
8.00
12.77
16.67
6.74
7.55
6.06
4.44
7.06
15.38
4.44
16.67
9.18
ND - Not detected
N/A - Not applicable
A4-82
-------
TABLE A4-34. SS2-FIELD SAMPLE DUPLICATE SUMMARY
(continued)
CBVCP
SS2
1 ,2-Dichlorobenzene
1 ,3-Dichlorobenzene
1 ,4-Dichlorobenzene
Total dichlorobenzenes
1 ,2,3-Trichlorobenzene
1 ,3,5-Trichlorobenz8ne
1 ,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
Total trichlorobenzenes
1 ,2,3,4-Tetrachlorobenzene
1 ,-2,3,5- and/or 1 ,2,4,5-Tetrachloro-benzene
Total tetrachlorobenzenes
Pentachlorobenzene
Hexachlorobenzene
2,3-Dichlorophenol
2,4-Dichlorophenol
2,5-Dichlorophenol
2,6-Dichlorophenol
3;4-Dichlorophenol
3,5-Dichlorophenol
Total dichlorophenols
2,3,4-Trichlorophenol
2,3,5-Trichlorophenol
2,3,6-Trichlofophenol
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol
Total trichlorophenols
2,3,4,5,- and/or 2,3,4,6-Tetrachlorc-phenol
2,3,5,6-Tetrachlorophenol
Total tetrachlorophenois
Pentachlorophenol
Minimum
Maximum
Average
Field sample
(ppb)
BQL 11000
ND 9300
BQL 57000
68000
BQL 20000
ND 9300
100000
120000
ND 9300
ND 19000
ND
ND 9300
BQL 9300
ND 9300
ND 9300
ND 9300
ND 9300
ND 9300
ND 9300
ND
ND 9300
ND 9300
ND 9300
ND 9300
ND 9300
ND
ND 19000
ND 9300
ND
ND 9300
Field sample
duplicate
(Ppb)
ND 9600
ND 9600
BQL 49000
49000
BQL 17000
ND 9600
BQL 83000
100000
ND 9600
ND 19000
ND
ND 9600
ND 9600
ND 9600
ND 9600
ND 9600
ND 9600
ND 9600
ND 9600
ND
ND 9600
ND , 9600
ND 9600
ND 9600
ND 9600
ND
ND 19000
ND 9600
ND
ND 9600
Average
(ppb)
10300
9450
53000
18500
9450
91500
9450
19000
9450
9450
9450
9450
9450
9450
9450
9450
9450
9450
9450
9450
9450
19000
9450
9450
9450
91500
15892
Relative %
difference
13.59
3.17
15.09
16.22
3.17
18.58
3.17
0.00
3.17
3.17
3.17
3.17
3.17
3.17
3.17
3.17
3.17
3.17
3.17
3.17
3.17
0.00
3.17
3.17
0.00
18.58
5.03
ND: Not detected
E3QL: Below quantitation limit
A4-83
-------
TABLE A4-34. SS2-FIELD SAMPLE DUPLICATE SUMMARY
(continued)
PAH
SS1
Acenaphthene
Fiuorene
Phenanthrene
Anthracene
Fiuoranthene
Pyrene
Benzo (a) anthracene
Chrysene
Benzo (b) fluoranthene
Benzo (k) fluoranthene
Benzo (e) pyrene
Benzo (a) pyrene
Perylene
Indeno (1,2,3-cd) pyrene
Dibenz (a,h) anthracene
Benzo (g.h.i) perylene
Naphthalene
2-Methyt naphthalene
2-Chloronaphthalene
Acenapthylene
Minimum
Maximum
Average
SURROGATE RECOVERY
2-FIuorophenol
Phenol -d5
2-Chlorophenol -d4
1 ,2-Dichtorobenzene -d4
Nitrobenzene -dS
2-Fluorobiphenyl
2,4,6-Tribromophenol
Terphenyl-d14
Minimum
Maximum
Average
Field sample
(ppb)
NO 93000
ND 93000
ND 93000
ND 93000
ND 93000
ND 93000
ND 93000
ND 93000
ND 93000
ND 93000
ND 93000
ND 93000
ND 93000
ND 93000
ND 93000
ND 93000
BQL 58000
95000
ND 93000
ND 93000
:
84 :
86
90
96
88
88
80
94
Field
sample
duplicate
,(PPb)
ND 96000
BQL 21000
ND 96000
ND 96000
ND 96000
BQL 10000
ND 96000
ND 96000
ND 96000
ND 96000
ND 96000
ND 96000
ND 96000
ND 96000
ND 96000
ND 96000
BQL 49000
BQL 79000
ND 96000
ND 96000
98
86
92
95
77
90
95
93
Average (ppb)
94500
57000
94500
94500
94500
51500
94500
94500
94500
94500
94500
94500
94500
94500
94500
94500
53500
87000
94500
94500
51500
94500
88050
91
86
91
96
83
89
88
94
83
96
90
Relative %
difference
3.17
126.32
3.17
3.17
3.17
161.17
3.17
3.17
3.17
3.17
3.17
3.17
3.17
3.17
3.17
3.17
16.82
18.39
3.17
3.17
3.17
161.17
18.67
15.38
0.00
2.20
1.05
13.33
2.25
17.14
1.07
0.00
17.14
6.55
ND - Not detected
BQL - Below quantitation limit
A4-84
-------
TABLE A4-34. SS2-FIELD SAMPLE DUPLICATE SUMMARY
(continued)
v*O"C ;
SS2
Vinyl chloride
Methyl chloride
Trans-1 ,2-Dichloroethene
Cis-1 ,2-Dichloroethene
Chloroform
1,1 ,1-Trichloroethane
Carbon tetrachloride
Benzene
1 ,2-Dichloroethane
Trichtoroethene
Toluene
1,1,2-Trichloroethane
Tetrachloroethene
1 ,2-Dibromoethane
Chlorobenzene
Ethylbenzene
m-p-Xylene
o-Xylene
1 ,3-Dichlorobenzene
1 ,4-DichIorobenzene
1 ,2-Dichlorobenzene
Minimum
Maximum
Average
Field sample
(PPb)
ND 2000
38000
ND 2000
20000
ND 2000
ND 2000
ND 2000
BQL 3400
ND 2000
180000
15000
ND 2000
ND 2000
ND 2000
ND 2000
BQL 5300
16000
BQL 4900
ND 2000
ND 2000
ND 2000
Field sample
duplicate
(PPb)
ND 2000
35000
ND 2000
19000
ND 2000
ND 2000
ND 2000
ND 2000
ND 2000
190000
BQL 8100
ND 2000
ND 2000
ND 2000
ND 2000
BQL 3000
110000
BQL 2900
ND 2000
ND 2000
ND 2000
Average
(ppb)
2000.00
36500.00
2000.00
19500.00
2000.00
2000.00
2000.00
2700.00
2000.00
185000.00
11550.00
2000.00
2000.00
2000.00
2000.00
4150.00
63000.00
3900.00
2000.00
2000.00
2000.00
2000.00
185000.00
16776.19
Relative %
difference
0.00
8.22
0.00
5.13
0.00
0.00
0.00
51.85
0.00
5.41
59.74
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
55.42
149.21
51.28
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
149.21
18.39
IMD - Not detected
BQL - Below quantitation limit
A4-85
-------
TABLE A4-34. SS2-FIELD SAMPLE DUPLICATE SUMMARY
(continued)
voc
Units
Field sample
Field sample
duplicate
Average
Relative %
difference
SS2
Total halogens
Ultimate analysis
Carbon
Hydrogen
Nitrogen
Chlorine
Fluorine
Phosphate
Oxygen
Total sulfur
Metals
Ag
As
Ba
Be
Cd
Cr
Cu
Hg
Mn
Ni
P
Pb
Sb
Se
Sn
Tl
Zn
%
%
%
%
%
%
u.g/L
WJ/L
u.g/L
H9/I-
ng/L
ng/L
u.g/L
ug/L
ng/L
ng/L
u.g/L
ng/L
ng/L
ng/L
ug/L
21.66
62.06
7.78
0.04
10.45
< 0.01
< 0.01
19.09
0.58
ND 1
ND 10
5.7
ND 1
ND 1
16
3.2
ND 0.1
ND 1
3.5
270
. 110
ND 10
ND 10
ND 10
ND 10
88
17.81
61.17
9.28
0.04
4.85
< 0.01
< 0.01
22.91
1.75
ND 1.00
ND 10.00
5.80
ND 1.00
1.20
18.00
8.40
ND ' 0.10
ND 1.00
3.80
290.00
120.00
ND 10.00
ND 10.00
ND 10.00
ND 10.00
92.00
19.74
61.62
8.53
0.04
7.65
0.01
0.01
21.00
1.17
1.00
10.00
5.75
1.00
1.10
17.00
8.30
0.10
1.00
3.65
280.00
115.00
10.00
10.00
10.00
10.00
90.00
19.51
1.44
17.58
0.00
73.20
0.00
0.00
18.19
100.43
0.00
0.00
1.74
0.00
18.18
11.76
2.41
0.00
0.00
8.22
7.14
8.70
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
4.44
ND
Not detected
A4-86
-------
TABLE A4-35. SS3, SS22 FIELD SAMPLE DUPLICATE SUMMARY
PCB
SS3 - Condition 2
Total monochtorobiphenyls
Total dichlorobiphenyls
Total trichtorobiphenyls
Total tetracntorobiphenyls
Total pentachtorobiphenyls
Total hexachlorobiphenyls
Total heptachlorobiphenyls
Total octachlorobiphenyls
Total nonachlorobiphenyls
Total decachlorobiphenyls
Minimum
Maximum
Average
SS22 - Condition 2
Total monochtorobiphenyls
Total dichlorobiphenyls
Total trichtorobiphenyls
Total tetrachtorobiphenyls
Total pentachtorobiphenyls
Total hexachlorobiphenyls
Total heptachlorobiphenyls
Total octachlorobiphenyls
Total nonachlorobiphenyls
Total decachlorobiphenyls
Minimum
Maximum
Average
Field sample (ppb)
510.00
22000.00
130000.00
210000.00
92000.00
9600.00
1700.00
580.00
230.00
NO
0.052
0.062
0.17
0.16
0.011
NO
ND
ND
ND
NO
Field sample
duplicate (ppb)
1000.00
44000.00
270000.00
420000.00
190000.00
18000.00
3100.00
700.00
ND
ND
0.037
0.079
0.13
0.12
9.40
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Average (ppb)
755.00
33000.00
200000.00
315000.00
141000.00
13800.00
2400.00
640.00
230.00
N/A
230.00
315000.00
78536.11
0.04
0.07
0.15
0.14
4.71
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
0.04
4.71
1.02
Relative %
difference
64.90
66.67 .
70.00
66.67
69.50
60.87
58.33
18.75
N/A
N/A
18.75
70.00
59.46
33.71
24.11
26.67
28.57
199.53
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
24.11
199.53
62.52
ND: Not detected
N/A: Not applicable
A4-87
-------
TABLE A4-35. SS3, SS22-RELD SAMPLE DUPLICATE SUMMARY
(continued)
CB/CP
SS3 - Condition 2, Run 1
1,2-DIchlorobenzene
1 ,3-Dichlorofaenzene
1 ,4-Dichlorobenzene
Total dichlorobenzenes
1 ,2,3-Trichlorobenzene
1 ,3,5-Trichlorobenzene
1 ,2,4-Trtehlorobenzene
Total trichlorobenzenes
1 ,2,3,4-Tetrachlorobenzene
1,2,3,5- and/or 1,2,4,5-Tetrachloro-benzene
Total tetrachlorobenzenes
Pentachlorobenzene
Hexachlorobenzene
2,3-Dichlorophenol
2,4-Dichlorophenol
2,5-Dichlorophenol
2,6-Oichlorophenol
3,4-Dichlorophenol
3,5-Dichloropheno)
Total dichlorophenols
2,3,4-Triohlorophenol
2,3,5-Trichlorophenol.
2,3,6-Trichloroph8nol
2,4,5-Trtehlorophenol
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol
Total trichlorophenols
2,3,4,5,- and/or 2,3,4,6-Tetrachloro-phenol
2,3,5,6-Totrachlorophenol
Total tetrachlorophenols
Pentachloropheno)
Minimum
Maximum
Average
Field
sample
(ppb)
ND 990.00
NO 990.00
ND 990.00
ND
ND 990.00
ND 990.00
ND 990.00
ND
ND 990.00
ND 2000.00
ND
ND 990.00
BQL 1600.00'
ND 990.00
ND 990.00
ND 990.00
ND 990.00
ND 990.00
ND 990.00
ND
ND 990.00
ND 990.00
ND 990.00
ND 990.00
ND 990.00
ND
ND 2000.00
ND 990.00
ND
ND 990.00
i
Field sample
duplicate
(ppb)
ND 950.00
ND 950.00
ND 950.00
ND
ND 950.00
ND 950.00
ND 950.00
ND
ND 950.00
ND 950.00 '
ND
ND 950.00
11000.00
ND 950.00
ND 950.00
ND 950.00
ND 950.00
ND 950.00
ND 950.00
ND
ND 950.00
ND 950.00
ND 950.00
ND 950.00
ND 950.00
ND
ND 950.00
ND 950.00
ND
ND 950.00
Average (ppb)
970.00
970.00
970.00
970.00
970.00
970.00
970.00
1475.00
970.00
6300.00
• 970.00
970.00
970.00
970.00
970.00
970.00 ,
970.00
970.00
970.00
970.00
970.00
'475.00
370.00
370.00
970.00
6300.00
1234.17
Relative %
difference
4.12
4.12
4.12
4.12
4.12
4.12
4.12
71.19
4.12
149.21
4.12
4.12
4.12
4.12
4.12
4.12
4.12
4.12
4.12
4.12
4.12
71.19
4.12
4.12
4.12
149.21
15.76
ND: Not detected
A4-88
-------
TABLE 4-35. SS3, SS22-FIELD SAMPLE DUPLICATE SUMMARY
(continued)
" — csycp
SS3 - Condition 2, Run 2
1 ,2-Dichlorobenzene
1 ,3-Dichlorobenzene
1 ,4-Dichlorobenzene
Total dichlorobenzenes
1 ,2,3-Trichlorobenzene
1 ,3,5-Trichlorobenzene
• 1 ,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
Total trtehlorobenzenes
1 ,2,3,4-Tetrachlorobenzene
1,2.3,5- and/or 1 ,2,4,5-Tetrachloro-benzene
Total Jetrachlorobenzenes
Pentachlorobenzene
Hexachlorobenzene
2,3-Dichlorophenol
2,4-Dichlorophenol
2,5-Oichlorophenol
2,6-Dichlorophenof
3,4-Dichlorophenol
3,5-Dichlorophenol
Total dichlorophenols
2,3,4-Trichloropnenol
2,3,5-Trichlorophenol
2,3,6-Triehlorophenol
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol
Total trichlorophenols
2,3,4,5,- and/or 2,3,4,6-TetrachIoro-phenol
2,3,5,6-Tetrachlorophenol
Total tetrachlorophenols
Pentachlorophenol
Minimum
Maximum
Average
Field sample
{ppb)
NO 890
ND 890
ND 890
ND
ND 890
ND 890
ND 890
ND
ND 890
ND 1800
ND
ND 890
13000
ND 890
ND 890
ND 890
ND 890
ND 890
ND 890
ND
ND 890
ND 890
ND 890
ND 890
ND 890
ND
ND 1800
ND 890
ND
ND 890
Field sample
duplicate (ppb]
ND 1000
ND 1000
ND 1000
ND
ND 1000
ND 1000
ND 1000
ND
ND 1000
ND 2100
ND
ND 1000
23000
ND 1000
ND 1000
ND 1000
ND 1000
ND 1000
ND 1000
ND
ND 1000
ND 1000
ND 1000
ND 1000
ND 1000
ND
ND 2100
ND 1000
ND
ND 1000
Average
(ppb)
945
945
945
945
945
945
945
1950
945
18000
945
945
945
945
945
945
945
945
945
945
945
1950
945
945
945
18000
1739
Relatlvel?
difference
11.64
11.64
11.64
11:64
11.64
11.64
11.64
15.38
11.64
55.56
11.64
11.64
11.64
11.64
11.64
11.64
11.64
11.64
11.64
11.64
11.64
15.38
11.64
11.64
11.64
55.56
13.78
ND: Not detected
A4-89
-------
TABLE A4-35. SS3, SS22-FIELD SAMPLE DUPLICATE SUMMARY
(continued)
PAH
SS3 - Condition 2, Run 1
Acenaphthene
Fluorene
Phenanthrene
Anthracene
Ruoranthene
Pyrene
Benzo (a) anthracene
Chrysene
Benzo (b) fluoranthene
Benzo (k) fluoranthene
Benzo (e) pyrene
Benzo (a) pyrene
Perylene
Indeno (1,2,3-cd) pyrene
Dibenz (a,h) anthracene
Benzo (g.h.i) perylene
Naphthalene
2-MethyInaphthalene
2-Chloronaphthalene
Acenapthylene
Minimum
Maximum
Average
SURROGATE RECOVERY
2-Fluorophenol
Phenol -d5
2-Chlorophenol -d4
1 ,2-Dichlorobenzene -d4
Nitrobenzene -d5
2-Fluorobiphenyl
2,4,6-Tribromophenol
Terphenyl -d14
Minimum
Maximum
Average
Field sample
(ppb)
ND 990.00
NO 990.00
BQL 2900.00
ND 990.00
BQL 2400.00
BQL 1900.00
ND 990.00
ND 990.00
ND 990.00
ND 990.00
ND 990.00
ND 990.00
ND 990.00
ND 990.00
ND 990.00
ND 990.00
BQL 1800.00
BQL 1000.00
ND 990.00
ND 990.00
BQL 78.00 •
BQL 90.00
BQL 84.00
BQL 77.00
BQL 85.00
BQL 96.00
BQL 91.00
BQL 99.00
Field sample
duplicate
(ppb)
ND 950.00
ND 950.00
BQL 2000.00
ND 950.00
BQL 1700.00
BQL 1400.00
ND 950.00
ND 950.00
ND 950.00
ND 950.00
ND 950.00
ND 950.00
ND 950.00
ND 950.00
ND 950.00
ND 950.00
BQL 960.00
ND 950.00
ND 950.00
ND 950.00
BQL 71.00
BQL 84.00
BQL 82.00
BQL 75.00
BQL 84.00
BQL 87.00
BQL 87.00
BQL 94.00
Average (ppb)
970.00
970.00
2450.00
970.00
2050.00
1650.00
970.00
970.00
970.00
970.00
970.00
970.00
970.00
970.00
970.00
970.00
1380.00
975.00
970.00
970.00
970.00
2450.00
1152.75
74.50
87.00
83.00
76.00
84.50
91.50
89.00
96.50
74.50
96.50
85.25
Relative %
difference
4.12
4.12
36.73
4.12
34.15
30.30
4.12
4.12
4.12
4.12
4.12
4.12
4.12
4.12
4.12
4.12
60.87
5.13
4.12
4.12
4.12
60.87
11.45
9.40
6.90
2.41
2.63
1.18
9.84
4.49
5.18
1.18
9.84
5.25
ND: Not detected
BQL: Below quantitation limit
A4-90
-------
TABLE A4-35. SS3, SS22-FIELD SAMPLE DUPLICATE SUMMARY
(continued)
— • ?m
SS3 - Condition 2, Run 2
Acenaphthene
Fluorene
Phenanthrene
Anthracene
Fluoranthene
Pyrene '
Benzo (a) anthracene
Chrysene
EJenzo (b) fluoranthene
EJenzo (k) fluoranthene
Benzo (e) pyrene
Benzo (a) pyrene
Perylene
Indeno (1,2,3-cd) pyrene
Dibenz (a,h) anthracene
Etenzo (g.h.i) perylene
Naphthalene
2-Methylnaphthalene
2-Chloronaphthalene
Acenapthylene
Minimum
Maximum
Average
SURROGATE RECOVERY
2-Fluorophenol
Phenol -d5
2-Ghlorophenol -d4
1 ,2-DichIorobenzene -d4
Nitrobenzene -d5
2-Fluorobiphenyl
2,4,6-Tribromophenol
Terphenyl-d14
Minimum
Maximum
Average
Field sample
(PPb)
ND 890.00
ND 890.00
ND 890.00
ND 890.00
ND 890.00
ND 890.00
ND 890.00
ND 890.00
ND 890.00
ND 890.00
ND 890.00
ND 890.00
ND 890.00
ND 890.00
ND 890.00
ND 890.00
ND 890.00
ND 890.00
ND 890.00
ND 890.00
BQL 66.00
BQL 81.00
BQL 75.00
BQL 62.00
BQL 76.00
BQL 86.00
BQL 92.00
BQL 101.00
Field sample
duplicate
(PPb)
ND 1000.00
ND 1000.00
BQL 4600.00
ND 1000.00
BQL 4000.00
BQL 3400.00
BQL 1600.00
BQL 1300.00
BQL 1600.00
ND 1000.00
ND 1000.00
BQL 1300.00
ND 1000.00
ND 1000.00
ND 1000.00
ND 1000.00
BQL 1200.00
BQL 1100.00
ND 1000.00
ND 1000.00
BQL 76.00
BQL 89.00
BQL 83.00
BQL 73.00
BQL 87.00
BQL 92.00
BQL 98.00
BQL 104.00
Average (ppb)
945.00
945.00
2745.00
945.00
2445.00
2145.00
1245.00
1095.00
1245.00
945.00
945.00
1095.00
945.00
945.00
945.00
945.00
1045.00
995.00
945.00
945.00
945.00
2745.00
1222.50
71.00
85.00
79.00
67.50
81.50
89.00
95.00
102.50
67.50
102.50
83.81
Relative %
difference
11.64
11.64
135.15
11.64
127.20
117.02
57.03
37.44
57.03
11.64
11.64
37.44
11.64
11.64
11.64
11.64
29.67
21.11
11.64
11.64
11.64
135.15
37.36
14.08
9.41
10.13
16.30
13.50
6.74
6.32
2.93
2.93
16.30
9.93
ND: Not detected
BQL: Below quantitatton limit
A4-91
-------
TABLE A4-35. SS3, SS22-FIELD SAMPLE DUPLICATE SUMMARY
(continued)
roe
SS3
Vinyl chloride
Methyl chloride
Trans-1 ,2-Dichloroethene
Cis-1 ,2-Dichtoroethene
Chloroform
1 ,1 ,1-Trichloroethane
Carbon Tetrachloride
Benzene
1,2-DIchloroethane
Trichloroethene
Toluene
1 ,1 ,2-Trichloroethane
Tetrachloroethene
1 ,2-Dibromoethane
Chlorobenzene
Ethylbenzene
m-p-Xylene
o-Xylene
1 ,3-Dichtorofaenzene
1 ,4-Dichlorobenzene
1 ,2-Dlchlorobenzene
Minimum
Maximum
Average
Field
sample
(PPb) i
ALR 4900
ALR 18000
ND 30 I
ND 31000
ND 30
ND 30
ND 30
BQL 42
ND 30
ALR 98000
ALR 9100
ND 30
ND 30
ND 30
BQL 46
ALR 5100
ALR 6800
ALR 4500
ND 30
BQL 93
ND 30
Field sample
duplicate (ppb)
ALR 59000
ALR 6800
ND 30
ALR 15000
ND 30
ND 30
ND 30
ND 30
ND 30
ALR 57000
2300
ND 30
ND 30
ND 30
ND 30
ALR 4500
ALR 5600
ALR 4000
ND 30
ND 30
ND 30
Average
(PPb)
31950.00
12400.00
NA
23000.00
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
77500.00
5700.00
NA
NA
NA
NA
4800.00
6200.00
4250.00
NA
NA
NA
4250.00
77500.00
20725.00
Relative %
difference
169.33
90.32'
NA
69.57
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
, 52.90
119.30
NA
NA
NA
NA
12.50
19.35
11.76
NA
NA
NA
11.76
169.33
68.13
SS3
Total organic carbon
Total sulfur
Total halogens (as chlorine
SS22
Total sulfur
Units
mg/kg
%
Field
sample
18100
ND
0.34
0.0026
Field sample
duplicate
18500
ND
0.05
0.0031
Average
(PPb)
18300.00
0.20
0.00
Relative %
difference
2.19
148.72
17.54
ND: Not detected
BQL: Below quantitation limit
ALR : Above linear range
NA: Not available
A4-92
-------
TABLE A4-3S. SS3, SS22 FIELD SAMPLE DUPLICATE SUMMARY
(continued)
Metals
SS3
Ag
As
Ba
Be
Cd
Cr
Cu
Hg
Mn
Ni
P
Pba
Sb
Se
Sn
Tl
Zn
Minimum
Maximum
Average^
Field
sample
(ppm)
ND 7.4
27
110
0.45
2.1
75
99
0.26
410
65
630
270
ND 7.4
ND 7.4
95
13
360
Field sample
duplicate (ppm)
1
16
too
0.36
1.2
27
45
0.19
290
19
370
170
ND 7.4
ND 7.4
45
ND 7.4
330
Average
(ppm)
NA
21.50
105.00
0.41
1.65
51.00
72.00
0.23
350.00
42.00
500.00
220.00
- NA
NA
70.00
NA
345.00
0.23 ;
500.00
136.83
Relative %
difference
NA
51.16
9.52
22.22
54.55
94.12
75.00
31.11
34.29
109.52
52.00
45.45
NA
NA
71.43
NA
8.70
8.70
109.52!
50.70
ND:
N/A:
Not detected
Not available
A4-93
-------
TABLE A4-36. PCB MATRIX SPIKE AND MATRIX SPIKE DUPLICATE SUMMARY
PCB
SS1 Conditions 1-3
Total monochlorobiphenyls
Total dichlorobiphenyls
Total trichlorobiphenyls
Total tetrachlorobiphenyls
Total pentachlorobiphenyls
Total hexachlorobiphenyls
Total heptachlorobiphenyls
Total octachlorobiphenyls
Total nonachlorobiphenyls
Total decachlorobiphenyls
Minimum
Maximum
Average
SS3 Condition 2- Run 2
Total monochlorobiphenyls
Total dichlorobiphenyls
Total trichlorobiphenyls
Total tetrachlorobiphenyls
Total pentachlorobiphenyls
Total hexachlorobiphenyls
Total heptachlorobiphenyls
Total octachlorobiphenyls
Total nonachlorobiphenyls
Total decachlorobiphenyls
Minimum
Maximum
Average
SS11 Condition 2
Total monochlorobiphenyls
Total dichlorobiphenyls
Total trichlorobiphenyls
Total tetrachlorobiphenyls
Total pentachlorobiphenyls
Total hexachlorobiphenyls
Total heptachlorobiphenyls
Total octachlorobiphenyls
Total nonachlorobiphenyls
Total decachlorobiphenyls
Minimum
Maximum
Average
Matrix spike
recovery
70
140
145
95
90
79
77
70
na
84
44
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
61
-347
-265
-388
-232
-71
24
27
25
na
25
Matrix spike
duplicate recovery
70
140
155
100
95
79
77
70
na
84
" 136
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
42
-306
-265
-347
-192
-81
37
36
30
na
30
Average
recovery (%)
70.00
140.00
150.00
97.50
92.50
79.00
77.00
70.00
na
84.00
70.00
150.00
95.56
90.00
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
51.50
51.50
90.00
70.75
-326.50
-265.00
-367.50
-212.00
-76.00
30.50
31.50
27.50
na
27.50
-367.50
31.50
-125.56
Relative %
difference
0.00
0.00
6.67
5.13
5.41
0.00
0.00
0.00
na
0.00
0.00
6.67
1.91
102.22
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
36.89
36.89
102.22
63.56
12.56
0.00
11.16
18.87
13.16
42.62
28.57
13.18
na
13.18
0.00
42.62
13.14
A4-94
-------
TABLE A4-36. PCB MATRIX SPIKE AND MATRIX SPIKE DUPLICATE SUMMARY
(continued)
PCB
SS11 Condition 3
Total monochlorobiphenyls
Total dichlorobiphenyls
Total trichtorobiphenyls
Total tetrachtorobiphenyls
Total pentachlorobiphenyls
Total hexachtorobiphenyls
Total heptachlorobiphenyls
Total octachlorobiphenyls
Total nonachlorobiphenyls
Total decachtorobiphenyls
Minimum
Maximum
Average
SS512 Condition 2
Total monochlorobiphenyls
Total dichlorobiphenyls
Total trichtorobiphenyls
Total tetrachtorobiphenyls
Total pentachlorobiphenyls
Total hexachtorobiphenyls
Total heptachlorobiphenyls
Total octachlorobiphenyls
Total nonachlorobiphenyls
Total decachtorobiphenyls
Minimum
Maximum
Average
SS12 Condition 3
Total monochtorobiphenyls
Total dichlorobiphenyls
Total trichtorobiphenyls
Total tetrachtorobiphenyls
Total pentachforobiphenyls
Total hexachtorobiphenyls
Total heptachlorobiphenyls
Total octachlorobiphenyls
Total nonachlorobiphenyls
Total decachtorobiphenyls
Minimum
Maximum
Average
Matrix spike
recovery
-211.00
-158.00
•53.00
13.00
26.00
44.00
45.00
38.00
na
38.00
163.00
233.00
478.00
323.00
52.00
7.00
121.00
86.00
na
35.00
6.00
28.00
32.00
14.00
-3.00
11.00
11.00
10.00
na
11.00
Matrix spike
duplicate recovery
-222.00
-89.00
-111.00
-33.00
0.00
41.00
41.00
39.00
na
43.00
123.00
178.00
306.00
283.00
52.00
6.00
93.00
80.00
na
68.00
4.00
19.00
14.00
16.00
0.00
11.00
11.00
10.00
na
11.00
Average
recovery (%)
-216.50
-123.50
-82.00
-10.00
13.00
42.50
43.00
38.50
na
40.50
-216.50
43.00
-28.28
,
143.00
205.50
392.00
303.00
52.00
6.50
107.00
83.00
na
51.50
6.50
392.00
149.28
5.00
23.50
23.00
15.00
-1.50
11.00
11.00
10.00
na
11.00
-1.50
23.50
12.00
Relative %
difference
5.08
55.87
70.73
460.00
200.0IO
7.06
9.30)
2.60
na
12.35
2.60)
460.00
91.44
27.97
26.715
43.83
13.20
000
15.33
26.17
7.23
na
64.03
0.00!
64.03
24.96
40.00
38.30
78.26
13.33
200.00
0.00)
0.00!
0.00
na
0.00)
0.00
200.0)0
41.10
A4-9S
-------
TABLE A4-36. PCB MATRIX SPIKE AND MATRIX SPIKE DUPLICATE SUMMARY
(continued)
PUB
SS13 Condition 1 -Run 1
Total monochtorobiphenyls
Total dichlorobiphenyls
Total trichtorobiphenyls
Total tetrachlorobiphenyls
Total pentachlorobiphenyls
Total hexachlorobiphenyls
Total heptachlorobiphenyls
Total octachlorobiphenyls
Total nonachlorobiphenyls
Total decachlorobiphenyls
Minimum
Maximum
Average
SS13 Condition 2
Total monochtorobiphenyls
Total dichlorobiphenyls
Total trichtorobiphenyls
Total tetrachlorobiphenyls
Total pentachlorobiphenyls
Total hexachlorobiphenyls
Total heptachlorobiphenyls
Total octachlorobiphenyls
Total nonachlorobiphenyls
Total decachlorobiphenyls
Minimum
Maximum
Average
SS13 Condition 3-Run 3
Total monochtorobiphenyls
Total dichlorobiphenyls
Total trichtorobiphenyls
Total tetrachlorobiphenyls
Total pentachlorobiphenyls
Total hexachlorobiphenyls
Total heptachlorobiphenyls
Total octachlorobiphenyls
Total nonachlorobiphenyls
Total decachlorobiphenyls
Minimum
Maximum
Average
Matrix spike
recovery
33.00
43.00
46.00
40.00
43.00
43.00
44.00
41.00
na
37.00
31
38
41
38
37
40
38
33
na
31
39.00
43.00
44.00
40.00
41.00
40.00
37.00
34.00
na
33.00
Matrix spike
duplicate recovery
40.00
53.00
54.00
43.00
43.00
39.00
38.00
53.00
I na
: 35.00
19
31
29
28
31
31
30
I 26
na
24
I
52.00
I 62.00
64.00
55.00
55.00
55.00
50.00
41.00
i . na
39.00
Average
recovery (%]
36.50
48.00
50.00
41.50
43.00
41.00
41.00
47.00
na
36.00
36.00
§0.00
42.67
2i.OO
34.50
35.00
33.00
34.00
35.50
34.00
29.50
na
27.50
25.00
35.50
32.00
45.50
52.50
54.00
47.50
48.00
47.50
43.50
37.50
na
36.00
36.00
54.00
45.78
Relative %
difference
19.13
20.83
16.00
7.23
0.00
9.76
14.63
25.53
na
5.56
0.00
25.53
13.19
48.00
20.29
34.29
30.30
17.65
25.35
23.53
23.73
nm
25.45
17.65
4S.OO
27.S2
28.57
36.19
37.04
31.58
29.17
31.58
29.89
18.67
na
16.67
16.67
37.04
28.82
A4-96
-------
TABLE A4-36. PCB MATRIX SPIKE AND MATRIX SPIKE DUPLICATE SUMMARY
(continued)
PCB
SS22 Condition 1 -Run 1
Total monochlorobiphenyls
Total dichlorobiphenyls
Total trichlorobiphenyls
Total Jetrachlorobiphenyls
Total pentachtorobiphenyls
Total hexachlorobiphenyls
Total heptachtorobiphenyls
Total octachlorobiphenyls
Total nonachlorobiphenyis
Total decachlorobiphenyls
Minimum
Maximum
Average
SS22 Condition 2-Run 2
Total monochlorobiphenyls
Total dichlorobiphenyls
Total trichlorobiphenyls
Total tetrachlorobiphenyls
Total pentachtorobiphenyls
Total hexachlorobiphenyls
Total heptachtorobiphenyls
Total octachlorobiphenyls
Total nonachlorobiphenyis
Total decachlorobiphenyls
Minimum
Maximum
Average
SS22 Conditiond-RunS
Total Monochlorobiphenyls
Total dichlorobiphenyls
Total trichlorobiphenyls
Total tetrachlorobiphenyls
Total pentachtorobiphenyls
Total hexachlorobiphenyls
Total heptachtorobiphenyls
Total octachlorobiphenyls
Total nonachlorobiphenyis
Total decachlorobiphenyls
Minimum
Maximum
Average
Matrix spike
recovery
69
73
68
55
60
48
43
40
na
42
23
32
30
27
29
30
30
27
na
25
-15.00
37.00
36.00
41.00
-6.00
31.00
28.00
26.00
na
18.00
Matrix spike
duplicate recovery
80
78
69
60
60
46
40
37
na
40
27
35
36
31
34
35
32
29
na
29
2.00
46.00
45.00
41.00
6.00
36.00
41.00
38.00
na
21.00
Average
recovery (%]
74.50
75.50
68.50
57.50
60.00
47.00
41.50
38,50
na
41.00
3850
75.50
56.00
25.00
33.50
33.00
29.00
31.50
32.50
31.00
28.00
na
27.00
25.00
33.50
30.06
-6.50
41.50
40.50
41.00
0.00
33.50
34.50
32.00
na
19.50
-6.50
41.50
26.22
Relative^"
difference
14.77
6.62
1.46
8.70
0.00
4.26
7.23
7.79
na
4.88
0.00
14.77
6.19
16.1X3
8.86
18.18
13.79
15.87
15.38
6.45
7.14
na
14.81
6.45
18.18
12.96
261.54
21.69
22.22
0.00
na
14.93
37.<58
S7.!»
na
15.38
0.00
261.54
51.37
A4-97
-------
TABLE A4-36. PCB MATRIX SPIKE AND MATRIX SPIKE DUPLICATE SUMMARY
(continued)
PCB
SS24 Condition 2
Run 2
Total monochlorobiphenyls
Total dichlorobiphenyls
Total trichtorobiphenyls
Total tetrachlorobiphenyls
Total pentachlorobiphenyls
Total hexachtorobiphenyls
Total heptachlorobiphenyls
Total octachlorobiphenyls
Total nonachlorobiphenyls
Total decachtorobiphenyls
Minimum
Maximum
Average
Matrix spike
recovery
(%)
61
121
303
100
250
90
69
60
na
62
Matrix spike
duplicate recovery
(%)
,
38
31
408
450
250
90
74
66
i na
64
;
i
Average
recovery (%)
49.50
76.00
355.50
275.00
250.00
90.00
71,50
63.00
na
€3.00
49.50
355.50
143.72
Relative %
difference
4@.46
113.42
29.54
127.27
0.00
0.00
6.99
9.52
na
3,17
000
127.27
37.93
A4-96
-------
TABLE A4-37. PCB SURROGATE RECOVERY SUMMARY
SAMPLE
ID
SSt Condition 1
Run 1
Run 2
Run 3
Average
RSD %
Condition 3
Run 1
Run 2
Run 3
Average
RSD %
SS2 Condition 1
Run 1
Condition 3
Run1
SS3 Condition 2
Run 1
Run2
Average
RPD%
SS10 Condition 2
Run 1
Run 2
Average
RPD%
SURROGATE RECOVERY (%)
2-Ruorobiphenyl
61.00
59.00
16.50
45.50
55.24
43.00
43.00
44.00
43.33
1.33
76.00
78.00
38.00
36.00
37.00
5.41
6.00
28.00
17.00
129.41
Tetrachlorobiphenyl-C1 3
66.00
56.00
33.50
51.83
32.11
58.00
76.00
80.00
71.33
16.43
156.00
145.50
126.00
115.50
120.75
8.70
12.00
43.00
27.50
112.73
Octachlorobiphenyl-C1 3
59.00
53.00
32.00
48.00
29.54
59.00
71.00
78.00
69.33
13.S6
,-,
76.50
73.00
65.00
57.50
61.25
12.24
32.50
52.00
42.25
46.15
-------
TABLE A4-37. PCS SURROGATE RECOVERY SUMMARY
SAMPLE
ID
SS11 Condition 1
Run 1-3
Condition 2
Runs 1&2
Condition 3 ,
Run 1-3
SS12 Condition 1
Run 1-3
Condition 2
Runs 1&2
Condition 3
Run 1-3
SS13 Condition 1
Run 3
Condition 2
Runs 1&2
Condition 3
Run 3
SS15-BR Condition 3
Run 2
Run 3
Average
RPD%
2-Fluorobiphenyl
61.00
58.00
55.00
54.00
45.00
43.00
43.00
22.00
46.00
21.00
23.00
22.00
9.09
SURROGATE RECOVERY (%)
Tetrachlorabiphenyl-C1 3
140.00
61.00
86.00
57.00
69.00
58.00
44.00
39.00
80.00
53.00
82.00
67.50
42.96
Octachlorobiphenvi-C 1 3
121.00
61.00
87.00
68.00
64.00
78.00
44.00
33.00
76.00
50.00
76.00
63.00
41.27
I
8
-------
TABLE A4-37. PCB SURROGATE RECOVERY SUMMARY
(continued)
SAMPLE
ID
SSI 5 Conditions
Run 1
Runs 2 & 3 *
Average
RSD % ^
SS18 Condition 1
Run 1-3
Condition 3
Run 1-3
SS22 Condition 1
Run 1
Run 2
Run 3
Average
RSD %
SURROGATE RECOVERY (%}
2-Fluorobiphenyl
60.00
40.00
50.00
40.00
54.00
66.00
99.00
113.00
70.00
94.00
23.33
Tetrachlorobiphenyl-C1 3
78.00
0.00
39.00
200.00
63.00
83.00
100.00
122.00
90.00
104.00
15.74
Octachlorobiphenyl-C1 3
83.00
40.00
61.50
69.92
60.00
81.00
94.00
127.00
90.00
103.67
19.59
* Surrogates for this composite were diluted out, values shown are estimates
-------
TABLE A4-37. PCB SURROGATE RECOVERY SUMMARY
SAMPLE
ID
SS22 Condition 2
Run1
Run 2 ,
BOR
EOR
Average
RSD %
Condition 3
BOC
Run1
Run 2
Run 3
EOC
_„,,„_- fc»WW
Run1
Run 2
Run 3
Average
RSD%
SS24 Condition 2
Run 1
BOR
EOR
Run 2
BOR
EOR
Average
RSD %
2-Fluorobiphenvl
30.50
23.00
25.00
26.17
14.84
58.00
67.00
83.00
56.00
61.00
76.00
66.83
16.04
62.00
39.00
51.00
46.00
49.50
19.55
SURROGATE RECOVERY {%)
Tetrachlorobiphenyl-G1 3
35.00
•
43.00 .
41.00
39.67
10.50
60.00
79.00
82.00
62.00
81.00
70.00
72.33
13.51
113.00
67.00
74.00
83.00
84.25
24.04
Octachlorobiphenyl-C1 3
30.00
39.00
38.00
35.67
13.83
58.00
78.00
86.00
63.00
83.00
81.00
74.83
15.39
72.50
44.50
70.00
78.00
66.25
22.46
I
8
-------
TABLE A4-38. CB, CP, AND PAH MATRIX SPIKE AND MATRIX SPIKE DUPLICATE
SUMMARY
~~~ PAH.CB/CP
SSI
Phenol
2-Chlorophenol
1 ,4-Dichlorobenzene
1 ,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
4-Chtoro-3-methylphenol
Acenaphthene
4-Nitrophenol
Hexachlprobenzene
Pentachlorophenol
Pyrene
SS2
Phenol
2-Chlorophenol
1 ,4-Dichlorobenzene
1 ,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
4-Chloro-3-methylphenol
Acenaphthene
4-Nitrophenol
Hexachlorobenzene
Pentachlorophenol
Pyrene
SS3
Phenol
2-Chlorophenol
1 ,4-Dichlorobenzene
1 ,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
4-Chtoro-3-methylphenol
Acenaphthene
4-Nftrophenol
Hexachlorobenzene
Pentachlorophenol
Pyrene
SS11 -Conditions
Phenol
2-Chlorophenol
1 ,4-Dichlorobenzene
1 ,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
4-Chloro-3-methylphenol
Acenaphthene
4-Nitrophenol
Hexachlorobenzene
Pentachlorophenol
Pyrene
Matrix spike
recovery (%;
25.00
44.00
72.00
70.00
65.00
72.00
0.00
84.00
0.00
106.00
78.00
78.00
88.00
85.00
90.00
91.00
72.00
NS
62.00
81.00
64.00
64.00
55.00
73.00
76.00
86.00
67.00
NS
2800
118.00
NC
54.00
48.00
56.00
26.00
NC
0.00
NS
114.00
NC
Matrix spike
duplicate recovery
31.00
59.00
82.00
78.00
69.00
76.00
5.00
84.00
2.00
102.00
74.00
75.00
83.00
86.00
86.00
88.00
70.00
NS
52.00
82.00
71.00
65.00
65.00
78.00
71.00
100.00
65.00
NS
26.00
239.00
NC
66.00
65.00
70.00
26.00
83.00
0.00
NS
89.00
NC
Average
recovery (%)
28.00
51.50
77.00
74.00
67.00
74.00
2.50
84.00
1.00
104.00
76.00
76.50
85.50
85.50
88.00
89.50
71.00
NA
57.00
81.50
67.50
64.50
60.00
75.50
73.50
93.00
66.00
NA
27.00
178.50
60.00
56.50
63.00
26.00
83.00
0.00
NA
101.50
NA
Relative %
difference
21.43
29.13
12.99
10.81
5.97
5.41
200.00
O.OQ
200.00
3.85
5.26
3.92
5.85
1.17
4.55
3.35
2.82
NA
17.54
1.23
10.37
1.55
16.67
6.62
6.80
15.05
3.03
NA
7.411
67.79
20.00
30.05)
22.22!
0.00
NA
0.00
NA
24.63
NA
A4-103
-------
TABLE A4-38. CB, CP, AND PAH MATRIX SPIKE AND MATRIX SPIKE DUPLICATE
SUMMARY (CONTINUED)
PAH.CB/CP
SS11- Condition 2
Phenol
2-Chtorophenol
1 ,4-Dichlorobenzene
1 ,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
4-Chtoro-3-methylphenol
Acenaphthene
4-Nitrophenol
Hexachtorobenzene
Pentachlorophenol
Pyrene
SS12 • Condition 3
Phenol
2-Chtorophenol
1 ,4-Dichlorobenzene
1 ,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
4-Chtoro-3-methylphenol
Acenaphthene
4-Nitrophenol
Hexachlorobenzene
Pentachlorophenol
Pyrene
SS12-Condition 2
Phenol
2-Chtorophenol
1 ,4-Dichlorobenzene
1 ,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
4-Chtoro-3-methylphenol
Acenaphthene
4-Nitrophenol
Hexachtorobenzene
Pentachlorophenol
Pyrene
SS13 - Condition 1
Phenol
2-Chtorophenol
1 ,4-Dichlorobenzene
1 ,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
4-Chtoro-3-methylphenol
Acenaphthene
4-Nitrophenol
Hexachlorobenzene
Pentachlorophenol
Pyrene
Matrix spike
recovery (%)
73.00
73.00
73.00
77.00
64.00
95.00
0.00
NS
55.00
NC
65.00
65.00
60.00
100.00
100.00
NC
65.00
NS
57.00
NC
66.00
57.00
53.00
67.00
70.00
130.00
NC
NS
13.00
NC
82.00
78.00
73.00
64.00
71.00
79.00
0.00
NS
51.00
161.00
Matrix spike
duplicate recovery
64.00
73.00
68.00
68.00
55.00
91.00
16.00
NS
70.00
NC
69.00
69.00
60.00
100.00
106.00
NC
69.00
NS
61.00
NC
70.00
70.00
62.00
66.00
70.00
121.00
NC
NS
112.00
NC
24.00
66.00
65.00
65.00
47.00
81.00
0.00
NS
49.00
123.00
Average
recovery (%)
68.50
73.00
70.50
72.50
59.50
93.00
8.00
NA
62.50
NA
67.00
67.00
60.00
100.00
103.00
NA
67.00
NA
59.00
NA
68.00
63.50
57.50
66.50
70.00
125.50
NA
NA
62.50
NA
72.00
69.00
64.50
59.00
80.00
0.00
NA
50.00
NA
Relative %
difference
13.14
0.00
7.09
12.41
15.13
4.30
200.00
NA
24.00
NA
5.97
5.97
0.00
0.00
5.83
NA
5.97
NA
6.78
NA
5.88
20.47
1SJ5
1.50
0.00
7.17
NA
NA
158.40
NA
16.67
11.59
1.55
40.68
NA
0.00
NA
4.00
NA
A4-104
-------
TABLE A4-38. CB, CP, AND PAH MATRIX SPIKE AND MATRIX SPIKE DUPLICATE
SUMMARY (CONTINUED)
PAH.CBA5P
SS13 - Condition 2
Phenol
2-Chlorophenol
1 ,4-Dichtorobenzene
1 ,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
4-Chloro-3-methylphenol
Acenaphthene
4-Nitrophenol
Hexachlorobenzene
Pentachtorophenol
Pyrene
SSI 3 -Condition 3
Phenol
2-Chlorophenol
1 ,4-Dichtorobenzene
1 ,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
4-Chtoro-3-methylphenol
Acenaphthene
4-Nitrophenol
Hexachlorobenzene
Pentachtorophenol
Pyrene
SS22 - Condition 1
Phenol
2-Chlorophenol
1 ,4-Dichtorobenzene
1 ,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
4-Chloro-3-methy!phenol
Acenaphthene
4-Nitrophenol
Hexachlorobenzene
Pentachtorophenol
Pyrene
SS22 - Condition 2 BOR
Phenol
2-Chtorophenol
1,4-Dichtorobenzene
1 ,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
4-Chtoro-3-methylphenol
Acenaphthene
4-Nitrophenol
Hexachlorobenzene
Pentachtorophenol
Pyrene
Matrix spike
recovery (%)
13.00
69.00
72.00
74.00
73.00
90.00
28.00
NS
59.00
NC
63.00
72.00
73.00
75.00
66.00
113.00
33.00
NS
63.00
109.00
41.00
86.00
86.00
73.00
135.00
286.00
0.00
80.00
51.00
NC
20.00
61.00
76.00
67.00
42.00
94.00
0.00
90.00
55.00
245.00
Matrix spike
duplicate recovery
45.00
55.00
61.00
53.00
46.00
61.00
23.00
NS
35.00
NC
48.00
75.00
64.00
73.00
72.00
120.00
31.00
NS
64.00
125.00
NC
83.00
90.00
69.00
110.00
59.00
0.00
94.00
51.00
NC
20.00
59.00
76.00
67.00
39.00
102.00
18.00
92.00
53.00
367.00
Average
recovery (%)
29.00
62.00
66.50
63.50
59.50
75.50
25.50
NA
47.00
NA
55.50
73.50
68.50
74.00
69.00
116.50
32.00
NA
63.50
NA
41.00
84.50
88.00
71.00
122.50
172.50
0.00
NA
51.00
NA
20.00
60.00
76.00
67.00
40.50
98.00
9.00
NA
54.00
NA
Relative %
difference
110.34
22.53
16.5*
33.07
45.38
38.41
19.61
NA
51.05
NA
27.03
4.08
13.14
2.70
8.70
6.01
6.25
NA
1.5*7
NA
NA
3.55
4.55
5.63
20.41
NA
0.00
NA
0.00
NA
0.00
3.33
0.00
0.00
7.41
8.16
200.00
NA
3.70
NA
A4-105
-------
TABLE A4-38. CB, CP, AND PAH MATRIX SPIKE AND MATRIX SPIKE DUPLICATE
SUMMARY (CONTINUED)
PAH.CB/CP
SS22 - Condition 2 BOR
Phenol
2-Chtorophenol
1 ,4-DichIorobenzene
1 ,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
4-Ch toro-3-methylphenol
Acenaphthene
4-Nitrophenol
Hexachlorobenzene
Pentachtorophenol
Pyrene
SS24 - Condition 2-Run 1
Phenol
2-Chtorophenol
1 ,4-Dichtorobenzene
1 ,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
4-Chtoro-3-methylphenol
Acenaphthene
4-Nitrophenol
Hexachlorobenzene
Pentachtorophenol
Pyrene
SS24 - Condition 2-Run 2
Phenol
2-Chtorophenol
1 ,4-Dichtorobenzene
1 ,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
4-Chtoro-3-methylphenol
Acenaphthene
4-Nitrophenol
Hexachlorobenzene
Pentachtorophenol
Pyrene
Matrix spike
recovery (%)
34.00
76.00
63.00
63.00
65.00
98.00
0.00
92.00
70.00
20.00
61.00
73.00
73.00
90.00
86.00
41.00
0.00
94.00
38.00
NC
1 |
28.00
69.00
62.00
66.00
73.00
76.00
39.00
NC
107.00
120.00
Matrix spike
duplicate recovery
35.00
69.00
62.00
60.00
64.00
104.00
0.00
98.00
70.00
140.00
61.00
86.00
88.00
100.00
96.00
102.00
0.00
92.00
18.00
NC
31.00
70.00
66.00
68.00
77.00
72.00
22.00
NC
95.00
116.00
Average
recovery (%)
34.50
72.50
62.50
61.50
64.50
101.00
0.00
NA
70.00
NA
61.00
79.50
80,50
95.00
91.00
71.50
0.00
NA
28.00
NA
29.50
69.50
§4.00
67.00
75.00
74.00
30.50
NA
101.00
NA
Relative %
difference
2.90
9.66
1.60
4.88
1.55
5.94
NA
NA
0.00
NA
NA
1f.3S
18.63
10.53
10.99
NA
0.00
NA
71.43
NA
10.17
1.44
6.25
2.39
5.33
5.41
55.74
NA
11.88
NA
NS - Not Spiked
NA - Not Available
NC - Could not be Calculated \
Notes: ;
1 2-chlorophenol and pentachlorophenol used to calculate CP precision and accuracy
2 1,4-dichtorobenzene, 1,2,4-trichlorobenzene, and hexachlorobenzene used to calculate
CB precision and accuracy
3 Acenaphthene and pyrene used to calculate PAH precision and accuracy
4 When hexachlorobenzene was not spiked, 1,2,4-trichtorobenzene was used as an
indicator to present hexachlorobenzene accuracy and precision
A4-106
-------
TARI
A Kin DAU dinn/ts« AVr? ni-«%A»*..». _......._..
mil* PVm u vnnwCin i E. nCvuvcnT SlIMMAHY
ID
Condition 1
Runt
Run 2
Run 3
Condition 3
Runt
Run 2
Run 3
SS2
Condition 1
Run1
Condition 3
Runl
Condition 2
Runl
Run 2
SS10
Condition 2
Runl
Run 2
SS11
Condition 1
Run 1.2.3
Condition 2
Run 1.2
2
Condition 2
Run 1.2
SSI 3
Condition 2
Run 1.2
Conditions
Run 1.2.3
SS18
Condition 1
Run 1.2.3
Condition 3
Run 1,2.3
2-Fluorophenol
5.00
38.00
44.00
1.00
42.00
28.00
84.00-
91.00
BQL 78.00
BQL 66.00
BQL 29.00
73.00
59.00
BQL 63.00
BQL 23.00
BQL 57.00
7.00
37.00
48.00
Phenol -dS
21.00
30.00
34.00
2.00
i 28.00
17.00
66.00
95.00
BQL 90.00
BQL 81.00
BQL 44.00
81.00
68.00
BQL 49.00
BQL 28.00
BQL 42.00
11.00
26.00
32.00
~ ~~~ SURROGATE RECOVERY (V.) ~~
2-Chtorophanol-d4 1,2-DicWofobenzene-d4 NHrobenzene-dS 2-FkwrobiDhenvl 2.4.6-Tribromoohenol T«mh«iwi-rtn
20.00
64.00
60.00
3.00
70.00
53.00
90.00
94.00
BQL 84.00
BQL 75.00
BQL 40.00
76.00
63.00
BQL 68.00
BQL 27.00
BQL 80.00
38.00
65.00
70.00
73.00
65.00
49.00
46.00
53.00
56.00
96.00
99.00
BQL 77.00
BQL 62.00
BQL 22.00
72.00
61.00
BQL 68.00
BQL 27.00
BQL 71.00
70.00
55.00
70.00
89.00
67.00
68.00
53.00
67.00
58.00
88.00
96.00
BQL 85.00
BQL 76.00
BQL 26.00
77.00
65.00
BQL 54.00
BQL 29.00
BQL 77.00
62.00
66.00
74.00
78.00
64.00
53.00
50.00
56.00
58.00
88.00
93.00
BQL 96.00
BQL 86.00
BQL 80.00
82.00
76.00
BQL 117.00
BQL 44.00
BQL 71.00
75.00
66.00
70.00
1.00
47.00
72.00
2.00
78.00
75.00
80.00
85.00
BQL 91.00
BQL 92.00
BQL 49.00
86.00
91.00
BQL 100.00
BQL 37.00
BQL 74.00
17.00
90.00
85.00
84.00
66.00
73.00
55.00
64.00
61.00
94.00
126.00
BQL 99.00
BQL 101.00
BQL 98.00
90.00
9200
BQL 60.00
BQL 42.00
BQL 97.00
80.00
76.00
75.00
-------
TABLE A4-39. CB, CP AND PAH SURROGATE RECOVERY SUMMARY
(continued)
SAMPLE
ID
SS22 Beginning of run
Condition 1
Runl
Run 2
Condition 2
Runl
Run 2
Condition 3
Runl
Run 2
Run 3
SS22Endof run
Condition 1
Runl
Run 3
Condition 2
Run 2
Conditions
Runl
Run 2
SS24 Beginning oi run
Condition 2
Run 1.
Run 2
SS24 End of run
Condition 2
Runl
Run 2
2-Fluorophenol
a.oo
51.00
BQL 23.00
BQL 30.00
24.00
BQL 43.00
BQL 33.00
0.00
BQL 56.00
BQL 47.00
BQL 36.00
BQL 56.00
BQL 42.00
BQL 49.00
BQL 30.00
38.00
Phenol -d5
7.00
32.00
BQL 16.00
BQL 27.00
i
10.00
BQL 20.00
BQL 23.00
7.00
BQL 47.00
BQL 35.00
BQL 18.00
BQL 38.00
BQL 31.00
BQL 34.00
BQL 33.00
25.00
SURROGATE RECOVERY (%) : '
2-ChlorophenoW4 1£-KcWofobenzene-d4 NMrobenzene-dS 2-FluoroblDhflnvl 2.4.8-Tribronoohflnol TerohenvtdM
35.00
64,00
BQL 46.00
BQL 65.00
59.00
BQL 78.00
BQL 67.00
35.00
BQL 85.00
BQL 72.00
BQL 63.00
BUL 82.00
BQL 78,00
BQL 71.00
BQL .62.00
70.00
63.00
83.00
BQL 55.00
BQL 62.00
67.00
BQL 62.00
BQL 78.00
63.00
BQL 54.00
BQL 50.00
BQL 67.00
BQL 60.00
BQL 84.00
BQL 64.00
BQL 37.00
53.00
60.00
88.00
BQL 43.00
BQL 64.00
73.00
BQL 75.00
BQL 83.00
69.00
BQL 04.00
BQL. 72.00
BQL 78.00
BQL 82.00
BQL 99.00
BQL 75.00
BQL 59.00
70.00
68.00
85,00
BQL 59.00
BQL 72.00
68.00
BQL 66.00
BQL 86.00
68.00
BQL 55.00
BQL 69.00
BQL 75.00
BQL 70.00
BQL 85.00
BQL 76.00
BQL 50.00
62.00
8.00
97.00
BQL 57.00
BQL 70.00
37.00
BQL 66.00
BQL 79.00
8.00
BQL 69.00
BQL 67.00
BQL 70.00
BQL 79.00
BQL 75;00
BQL 82.00
BQL 66.00
79.00
70.00
83.00
BQL 70.00
BQL 89.00
75.00
BQL 86.00
BQL 89.00
70.00
BQL 93.00
BQL 95.00
BQL 82.00
BQL 90.00
BQL 106.00
BQL 105.00
BQL 63.00
107.00
BQL • Below quanUallon llmH
I
8
-------
TABLE A4-40. VOC MATRIX SPIKE AND MATRIX SPIKE DUPLICATE SUMMARY
VOC
SS1 - Conditions 1-3
1,1-dichloroethene
Trichloroethene
Benzene
Toluene
Chlorobenzene
Minimum
Maximum
Average
SS2- Conditions 1-3
1,1-dichloroethene
Trichloroethene
Benzene
Toluene
Chlorobenzene
Minimum
Maximum
Average
SS3 - Condition 2
1,1-dichloroethene
Trichloroethene
Benzene
Toluene
Chlorobenzene
Minimum
Maximum
Average
Matrix spike
recovery {%)
82
96
106
96
108
172
60
103
98
108
0
0
101
0
138
Matrix spike
duplicate recovery
94
104
118
108
118
72
140
85
68
94
147
0
160
0
112
Average
recovery (%)
88.00
100.00
112.00
102.00
113.00
88.00
113.00
103.00
122.00
100.00
94.00
83.00
101.00
83.00
122.00
100.00
73.50
0.00
130.50
0.00
125.00
0.00
130.50
65.80
Relative %
difference
13.64
8.00
10.71
11.76
8.85
8.00
13.64
10.59
81.97
80,00
19.15
36.14
13.86
13.86
81.97
46.22
200.00
NA
45.21
NA
20.80
20.80
200.00
88.67
NA - Not applicable
Note:
Since perchloroethylene was not used as a matrix spike compound, trichloroethene
was used.as the indicator when presenting accuracy and precision for
perchloroethylene
A4-109
-------
TABLE A4-40. VOC MATRIX SPIKE AND MATRIX SPIKE DUPLICATE SUMMARY
(continued)
VOC
SS11 -Condition 3
1,1-dichloroethene
Trichloroethene
Benzene
Toluene
Chlorobenzene
Minimum
Maximum
Average
SS11 -Condition 2
1,1-dichloroethene
Trichloroethene
Benzene
Toluene
Chlorobenzene
Minimum
Maximum
Average
Matrix spike
recovery (%)
88
108
0
240
98
74
0
112
. 200
110
Matrix spike
duplicate recovery
; 90
88
0
i 182
102
o
i o
20
618
; 116
i
Average
recovery (%)
89.00
98.00
0.00
211.00
100.00
0.00
211.00
99.60
37.00
0.00
66.00
409.00
113.00
0.00
409.00
125.00
Relative %
difference
2.25
20.41
NA
27.49
4.00
2.25
27.49
13.54
200.00
NA
139.39
102.20
5.31
5.31
200.00
111.73
NA - Not applicable
Note:
Since perchloroethylene was not used as a matrix spike compound, trichloroethene
was used as the indicator when presenting accuracy and precision for
perchloroethylene
A4-110
-------
TABLE A4-40. VOC MATRIX SPIKE AND MATRIX SPIKE DUPLICATE SUMMARY
(continued)
VOC
SS12-Condition3
1,1-dichloroethene
Trichloroethene
Benzene
Toluene
Chlorobenzene
Minimum
Maximum
Average
SS12-Conditlon 2
1,1-dichloroethene
Trichloroethene
Benzene
Toluene
Chlorobenzene
Minimum
Maximum
Average
Matrix spike
recovery {%)
205
52
12000
0
100
311
81
58
84
104
Matrix spike
duplicate recovery
112
151
29
0
33
24
78
0
78
107
Average
recovery (%)
158.50
101.50
6014.50
0.00
66.50
0.00
6014.50
1268.20
167.50
79.50
29.00
81.00
105.50
29.00
167.50
92.50
Relative %
difference
58.68
97.54
199.04
NA
100.75
58.68
199.04
114.00
171.34
3.77
200.00
7.41
2.84
2.84
200.00
77.07
NA - Not applicable
Note:
Since perchloroethylene was not used as a matrix spike compound, trichloroethene
was used as the indicator when presenting accuracy and precision for
perchloroethylene
A4-111
-------
TABLE A4-40. VOC MATRIX SPIKE AND MATRIX SPIKE DUPLICATE SUMMARY
(continued)
VOC
SS13-Conditlon 1
1 ,1 -dichloroethene
Trichloroethene
Benzene
Toluene
Chlorobenzene
Minimum
Maximum
Average
SS13-CondItIon2
1,1 -dichloroethene
Trich'ioroethene
Benzene
Toluene
Chlorobenzene
Minimum
Maximum
Average
SS13-Condition 3
1,1 -dichloroethene
Trichloroethene
Benzene
Toluene
Chlorobenzene
Minimum
Maximum
Average
Matrix spike
recovery (%)
76
84
80
108
112
60
122
102
90
92
119
117
750
129
119
Matrix spike
duplicate recovery
68
88
52
112
96
i
i 66
142
'' 114
92
94
119
119
869
129
118
Average
recovery (%)
72.00
86.00
66.00
110.00
104.00
66.00
110.00
87.60
63.00
132.00
108.00
§1,00
93.00
63.00
132.00
97.40
119.00
118.00
809.50
129.00
118.50
118.00
809.50
258.80
Relative %
difference
11.11
4.65
42.42
3.64
15.38
3.64
42.42
15.44
9.52
15.15
11.11
2.20
2.15
2.15
15.15
8.03
0.00
1.69
14.70
0.00
0.84
0.00
14.70
3.45
NA - Not applicable ;
Note:
Since perchloroethylene was not used as a matrix spike compound, trichloroethene
was used.as the indicator when presenting accuracy and precision for
perchloroethylene
A4-112
-------
TABLE A4-40. VOC MATRIX SPIKE AND MATRIX SPIKE DUPLICATE SUMMARY
(continued)
VOC
SS22-Conditlon 1
1,1-dichloroethene
Trichloroethene
Benzene
Toluene
Chlorobenzene
Minimum
Maximum
Average
SS22"Oondition 2
1,1-dichloroethene
Trichloroethene
Benzene .
Toluene
Chlorobenzene
Minimum
Maximum
Average
SS22-Condition 3
1 , 1 -dichloroethene
Trichloroethene
Benzene
Toluene
Chlorobenzene
Minimum
Maximum
Average
SS24-Condltion 2
1,1-dichloroethene
Trichloroethene
Benzene
Toluene _
Chlorobenzene
Minimum
Maximum
Average
Matrix spike
recovery {%)
102
96
4000
280
120
64
140
114'
94
100
84
88
30
114
110
66
160
122
96
98
Matrix spike
duplicate recovery
/o/ \
(/o)
90
90
3800
260
118
64
160
116
96
94
. 80
90
30
110
110
62
132
114
94
100
Average
recovery (%)
96.00
93.00
3900.00
270.00
119.00
93.00
3900.00
895.60
64.00
150.00
115.00
95.00
97.00
64.00
150.00
104.20
82.00
89.00
30.00
112.00
110.00
30.00
112.00
84.60
64.00
146.00
118.00
95.00
99.00
64.00
146.00
104.40
Relative %
difference
12.50
6.45
5.13
7.41
1.68
1.68
12.50
6.63
0.00
13.33
1.74
2.11
6.19
0.00
13.33
4.67
4.88
225
0.00
3.57
0.00
0.00
4.88
2.14
6.25
19.18
6.78
2.11
2.02
2.02
19.18
7.27
NA - Not applicable
Note:
Since perchloroethylene was not used as a matrix spike compound, trichloroethene
was used as the indicator when presenting accuracy and precision for
perchloroethylene -''..•
A4-113
-------
TABLE A4-41. PCDD/PCDF LABORATORY CONTROL SPIKE RESULTS
PCDD/PCDF
Condition 1 - run 2 liquids
2378-TCDF
Total TCDF
2378-TCDD
Total TCDD
12378-PeCDF
23478-PeCDF
Total PeCDF
12378-PeCDD
Total PeCDD
123478-HxCDF
123678-HxCDF
123789-HxCDF
234678-HxCDF
Total HxCDF
123478-HxCDD
123678-HxCDD
123789-HxCDD
Total HxCDD
1234678-HpCDF
1234789-HpCDF
Total HpCDF
1234678-HpCDD
Total HpCDD
OCDF
OCDD
Laboratory control
spike- quantity
measured (ng)
0.18
0.18
0.18
0.18
0.94
0.89
1.80
0.93
0.93
0.86
0.99
0.80
0.89
3.50
1.00
0.87
0.81
2.70
0.85
0.86
1.70
0.91
0.91
2.00
1.70
Laboratory control
spike recovery
(%)
90
90
90
90
94
89
90
93
93
86
99
80
89
88
100
87
81
90
85
86
85
91
91
100
85
Samples that
affect the
spike
SS22
TCT#1026
o
A4-114
-------
TABLE A4-41. PCDD/PCDF LABORATORY CONTROL SPIKE RESULTS
PCDD/PCDF
Condition 1 - run 1 liquids
2378-TCDF
Total TCDF
2378-TCDD
Total TCDD
12378-PeCDF
23478-PeCDF
total PeCDF
12378-PeCDD
Total PeCDD
123478-HxCDF
123678-HxCDF
123789-HxCDF
234678-HxCDF
Total HxCDF
123478-HxCDD
123678-HxCDD
123789-HxCDD
Total HxCDD
1234678-HpCDF
1234789-HpCDF
Total HpCDF
1234678-HpCDD
Total HpCDD
OCDF
OCDD .
Laboratory control
spike- quantity
measured (nq)
0.22
0.22
0.20
0.20
1.10
1.00
2.10
1.00
1.00
1.00
0.97
0.96
0.99
o 3.90
0.84
1.10
0.94
3.00
1.00
1.00
2.00
1.00
1.00
2.10
2.00
Laboratory control
spike recovery
(%)
110
110
100
100
110
100
105
100
100
100
97
96
99
98
94
110
94
100
100
100
100
100
100
1.5
100
Samples that
affectthe
spike
SS22 EOR
TCT#1028
A4-115
-------
TABLE A4-41. PCDD/PCDF LABORATORY CONTROL SPIKE RESULTS
(continued)
PCDD/PCDF
Condition 1 - run 1 liquids
2378-TCDF
Total TCDF
2378-TCDD
Total TCDD
12378-PeCDF
23478-PeCDF
Total PeCDF
12378-PeCDD
Total PeCDD
123478-HxCDF
123678-HxCDF
123789-HxCDF
234678-HxCDF
Total HxCDF
123478-HxCDD
123678-HxCDD
123789-HxCDD
Total HxCDD
1234678-HpCDF
1234789-HpCDF
Total HpCDF
1234678-HpCDD
Total HpCDD
OCDF
OCDD
Laboratory control
spike- quantity
measured (ng)
0.18
0.18
0.18
0.18
0.94
0.89
1.80
0.93
0.93
0.86
0.99
0.80
0.89
3.50
1.00-
0.87
0.81
2.70
0.85
0.86
1.70
0.91
0.91
2.00
1.70
Laboratory control
spike recovery
(%)
90
90
90
90
94
89
90
93
93
86
99
80
89
88
100
87
81
90
85
86
85
91
91
100
85
Samples that
affect the
spike
SS1
TCT#1026
A4-116
-------
TABLE A4-41. PCDD/PCDF LABORATORY CONTROL SPIKE RESULTS
PCDD/PCDF
Condition 1 - run 1 solids
2378-TCDF
Total TCDF
2378-TCDD
Total TCDD
12378-PeCDF
23478-PeCDF
Total PeCDF
12378-PeCDD
Total PeCDD
123478-HxCDF
123678-HxCDF
123789-HxCDF
234678-HxCDF
Total HxCDF
123478-HxCDD
123678-HxCDD
123789-HxCDD
Total HxCDD
1234678-HpCDF
1234789-HpCDF
Total HpCDF
1234678-HpCDD
Total HpCDD
OCDF
OCDD
Laboratory control
spike- quantity
measured (ng)
0.18
0.18
0.19
0.19
1.00
0.95
2.00
0.90
0.90
1.00
0.97
0.88
0.96
3.80
1.00
0.90.
0.70
2.60
0.91
0.93
1.80
0.93
0.93
1.90
1.70
Laboratory control
spike recovery
(%)
90
90
95
95
100
95
100
90
90
100
97
88
96
95
100
90
70
87
91
93
90
93
93
95
85
Samples that
affect the
spike
SS22
TCT#1026
A4-117
-------
TABLE A4-41. PCDCVPCDF LABORATORY CONTROL SPIKE RESULTS
(continued)
PCDD/PCDF
Condition 1 - run 3 liquids
2378-TCDF
Total TCDF
2378-TCDD
Total TCDD
12378-PeCDF
23478-PeCDF
Total PeCDF
12378-PeCDD
Total PeCDD
123478-HxCDF
123678-HxCDF
123789-HxCDF
234678-HxCDF
Total HxCDF
123478-HxCDD
123678-HxCDD
123789-HxCDD
Total HxCDD
1234678-HpCDF
1234789-HpCDF
Total HpCDF
1234678-HpCDD
Total HpCDD
OCDF
OCDD
Laboratory control
spike- quantity
measured (ng)
0.18
0.18
0.18
0.18
0.94
0.89
1.80
0.93
0.93
0.86
0.99
0.80
0.89
3.50
1.00
0.87
0.81
2.70
0.85
0.86
1.70
0.91
0.91
2.00
1.70
Laboratory control
spike recovery
(%)
90
90
90
90
94
89
90
93
93
86
99
80
89
88
100
87
81
90
85
86
85
91
91
100
85
Samples that
affect the
spike
SS1, 13, 18
SS22
TCT#1026
A4-118
-------
TABLE A4-41. PCDD/PCDF LABORATORY CONTROL SPIKE RESULTS
PCDD/PCDF
Condition 1 - run 3 solids
2378-TCDF
Total TCDF
2378-TCDD
Total TCDD
12378-PeCDF
23478-PeCDF
Total PeCDF
12378-PeCDD
Total PeCDD
123478-HxCDF
123678-HxCDF
123789-HxCDF
234678-HxCDF
Total HxCDF
123478-HxCDD
123678-HxCDD
123789-HxCDD
Total HxCDD
1234678-HpCDF
1234789-HpCDF
Total HpCDF
1234678-HpCDD
Total HpCDD
OCDF
OCDD
Laboratory control
spike- quantity
measured (ng)
0.18
0.18
0.16
0.16
1.00
0.96
2.00
0.98
0.98
0.93
0.97
0.91
3.70
13.00
1.10
1.00.
3.40
0.92
0,96
1.90
0.90
0.90
1.90
1.80
1.80
Laboratory control
spike recovery
(%)
90
90
80
80
100
96
100
98
98
93
93
97
91
93
130
110
100
113
92
96
95
90
90
95
90
Samples that
affect the
spike
-, .
SS11, 12
TCT1105A
, ;
A4-119
-------
TABLE A4-41. PCDD/PCDF LABORATORY CONTROL SPIKE RESULTS
(continued)
PCDD/PCDF
Condition 3 - run 1 solids
2378-TCDF
Total TCDF
2378-TCDD
Total TCDD
12378-PeCDF
23478-PeCDF
Total PeCDF
12378-PeCDD
Total PeCDD
123478-HxCDF
123678-HxCDF
123789-HxCDF
234678-HxCDF
Total HxCDF
123478-HxCDD
123678-HxCDD
123789-HxCDD
Total HxCDD
1234678-HpCDF
1234789-HpCDF
Total HpCDF
1234678-HpCDD
Total HpCDD
OCDF
OCDD
Laboratory control
spike- quantity
measured (ng) .
0.22
0.22
0.23
0.23
1.20
1.10
2.30
1.10
.10
.20
.10
.10
.20
4.60
1.10
1.00
0.94
3.00
1.10
1.10
2.20
1.00
1.00
1.90
2.20
Laboratory control
spike recovery
(%)
110
110
115
115
120
110
115
110
110
120
110
110
120
115
110
100
94
100
110
110
110
100
100
95
110
Samples that
affect the
spike
SS2
• TCT1102A
A4-120
-------
TABLE A4-41. PCDD/PCDF LABORATORY CONTROL SPIKE RESULTS
PCDD/PCDF
Condition 2 - run 1 liquids
2378-TCDF
Total TCDF
2378-TCDD
Total TCDD
12378-PeCDF
23478-PeCDF
Total PeCDF
12378-PeCDD
Total PeCDD
123478-HxCDF
123678-HxCDF
123789-HxCDF
234678-HxCDF
Total HxCDF
123478-HxCDD
123678-HxCDD
123789-HxCDD
Total HxCDD
1234678-HpCDF
1234789-HpCDF
Total HpCDF
1234678-HpCDD
Total HpCDD
OCDF
OCDD
Laboratory control
spike- quantity
measured (ng)
0.18
0.18
0.16
0.16
0.95
0.94
1.90
0.88
0.88
0.93
0.92
0.89
0.92
3.70
1.10
0.87
0.89
2.90
0,81
0.84
1.70
0.90
0,90
1.60
1.60
Laboratory control
spike recovery
(%)
90
90
80
80
95
94
95
88
88
93
92
89
92
93
110
87
89
97
81
84
85
90
90
80
80
Samples that
affect the
spike
SS22, 24
BOR
. LJV^I I
TCT#1209
A4-121
-------
TABLE A4-41. PCDD/PCDF LABORATORY CONTROL SPIKE RESULTS
(continued)
PCDD/PCDF
Condition 2 - run 1 solids
2378-TCDF
Total TCDF
2378-TCDD
Total TCDD
12378-PeCDF
23478-PeCDF
Total PeCDF
12378-PeCDD
Total PeCDD
123478-HxCDF
123678-HxCDF
123789-HxCDF
234678-HxCDF
Total HxCDF
123478-HxCDD
123678-HxCDD
123789-HxCDD
Total HxCDD
1234678-HpCDF
1234789-HpCDF
Total HpCDF
1234678-HpCDD
Total HpCDD
OCDF
OCDD
Laboratory control
spike- quantity
measured (ng)
0.20
0.20
0.18
0.18
1.00
1.00
2.00
0.87
0.87
0.98
0.99
0.96
0.84
3.80
1.00
0.91 .
0.86
2.80
0.84
0.85
1.70
0.94
0.94
1.90
1.60
Laboratory control
spike recovery
(%)
100
100
90
90
100
100
.100
87
87
98
99
96
84
95
100
91
86
93
84
85
85
94
94
95
80
Samples that
affect the
spike
SS3
TCT #12098
• ,
A4-122
-------
TABLE A4-41. PCDD/PCDF LABORATORY CONTROL SPIKE RESULTS
PCDD/PCDF
Condition 2 - run 1 liquids
2378-TCDF
Total TCDF
2378-TCDD
Total TCDD
12378-PeCDF
23478-PeCDF
Total PeCDF
12378-PeCDD
Total PeCDD
123478-HxCDF
123678-HxCDF
123789-HxCDF
234678-HxCDF
Total HxCDF
123478-HxCDD
123678-HxCDD
123789-HxCDD
Total HxCDD
1234678-HpCDF
1234789-HpCDF
Total HpCDF
1234678-HpCDD
Total HpCDD
OC[)F
OCDD
Laboratory control
spike- quantity
measured (nq)
0.21
0.21
0.23
0.23
1.20
1.10
2.30
1.10
1.10
1.20
1.20
1.10
1.10
4.60
1.10
1.10
0.91
3.10
0.99
1.00
2.00
1.10
1.10.
2.30
2.10
Laboratory control
spike recovery
(%)
105
105
115
115
120
110
115
110
110
120
120
110
110
115
110
110
91
103
99
100
100
110
110
115
105
Samples that
affect the
spike
SS22, SS24
Archives
TCT#1217
!
A4-123
-------
TABLE A4-41. PCDD/PCDF LABORATORY CONTROL SPIKE RESULTS
(continued)
PCDD/PCDF
Condition 2 - run 1 , 2 solids
2378-TCDF
Total TCDF
2378-TCDD
Total TCDD
12378-PeCDF
23478-PeCDF
Total PeCDF
12378-PeCDD
Total PeCDD
123478-HxCDF
123678-HxCDF
123789-HxCDF
234678-HxCDF
Total HxCDF
123478-HxCDD
123678-HxCDD
123789-HxCDD
Total HxCDD
1234678-HpCDF
1234789-HpCDF
Total HpCDF
1234678-HpCDD
Total HpCDD
OCDF
OCDD
Laboratory control
spike- quantity
measured (ng)
0.20
0.20
0.17
0.17
0.97
0.98 !
2.00 !
0.80
0.80
1.00
0.98
0.95
0.95
3.90
0.99 -
0.92 .
0.94
2.90
0.83
0.89
1.70
0.93
0.93
2.00
1.80
Laboratory control
spike recovery
(%)
100
100
85
85
97
98
100
80
80
100
98
95
95
98
99
92
94
97
83
89
85
93
93
100
90
Samples that
affect the
spike
SS3
SS10C2R1
SS10C2R2
SS10 FB
TCTS1215A
A4-124
-------
TABLE A4-41. PCDD/PCDF LABORATORY CONTROL SPIKE RESULTS
PCDD/PCDF
Condition 2 -run 2 liquids
2378-TCDF
Total TCDF
2378-TCDD
Total TCDD
12378-PeCDF
23478-PeCDF
Total PeCDF
12378-PeCDD
Total PeCDD
123478-HxCDF
123678-HxCDF
123789-HxCDF
234678-HxCDF
Total HxCDF
123478-HxCDD
123678-HxCDD
123789-HxCDD
Total HxCDD
1234678-HpCDF
1234789-HpCDF
Total HpCDF
1234678-HpCDD
Total HpCDD
OCDF
OCDD
Laboratory control
spike- quantity
measured (ng)
0.21
0.21
0.23
0.23
1.20
1.10
2.30
1.10
i.10
1.20
1.20
1.10
1.10
4.60
1.10
1.10.
0.91
3.10
0.99
1.00
2.00
1.10
1.10
2.30
2.10
Laboratory control
spike recovery
(%)
105
105
115
115
120
110
115
110
110
120
120
110
110
115
110
110
91
103
99
100
100
110
110
115
105
Samples that
affect the
spike
SS13
SS22
SS24
TCT#1217
A4-125
-------
TABLE A4-41. PCDD/PCDF LABORATORY CONTROL SPIKE RESULTS
(continued)
PCDD/PCDF
Condition 2 - run 2 solids
2378-TCDF
Total TCDF
2378-TCDD
Total TCDD
12378-PeCDF
23478-PeCDF
Total PeCDF
12378-PeCDD
Total PeCDD
123478-HxCDF
123678-HxCDF
123789-HxCDF
234678-HxCDF
Total HxCDF
123478-HxCDD
123678-HxCDD
123789-HxCDD
Total HxCDD
1234678-HpCDF
1234789-HpCDF
Total HpCDF
1234678-HpCDD
Total HpCDD ,
OCDF
OCDD
Laboratory control
spike- quantity
measured (ng)
0.19
0.19
0.17
0.17
1.00
0.97
2.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
0.97
0.97
3.90
0.96
0.89
0.69
2.50
0.89
0.89
1.80
0.98
0.98
2.30
1.80
Laboratory control
spike recovery
(%)
95
95
85
85
100
97
100
100
100
; 100
100
: 97
i 97
98
96
89
69
83
89
89
90
98
98
! 115
90
Samples that
affect the
spike
SS11
TCTS1217A
A4-126
-------
TABLE A4-41. PCDD/PCDF LABORATORY CONTROL SPIKE RESULTS
PCDD/PCDF
Condition 2 - run 2 solids
2378-TCDF
Total TCDF
2378-TCDD
Total TCDD
12378-PeCDF
23478-PeCDF
Total PeCDF
12378-PeCDD
Total PeCDD
123478-HxCDF
123678-HxCDF
123789-HxCDF
234678-HxCDF
Total HxCDF
123478-HxCDD
123678-HxCDD
123789-HxCDD
Total HxCDD
1234678-HpCDF
1234789-HpCDF
Total HpCDF
1234678-HpCDD
Total HpCDD
OCDF
OCDD
Laboratory control
spike- quantity
measured (ng)
0.22
0.22
0.25
0.25
1.10
1.10
2.20
0.99
0.99
1.20
1.10
1.10
1.20
4.60
0.98
1.20
1.10
3.30
1.10
1.10
2,20
1.10
1.10
2.60
2.10
Laboratory control
spike recovery
(%)
110
110
125
125
110
110
110 ...
99
99
120
110
110
120
115
98
120
110
110
110
110
110
110
110
130
105
Samples that
affect the
spike
SS12
305937
-
A4-127
-------
TABLE A4-42. SS22 - SCRUBBER LIQUOR METALS
MATRIX SPIKE RESULTS
METAL
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Beryllium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Phosporus
Selenium
Silver
Thallium
Tin
Zinc
RECOVERY (%)
100
101
94
105
98
98
94
104
97
NA
100
101
97
93
30
NA
98
A4-128
-------
TABLE A4-43. ORGANIC HALOGEN QA RESULTS
Laboratory control spikes ~ :
Test
C1R1
C1R2
C1R3
C3R1
C3R2
C3R3
Recovery
101
102
102
102
98
98
98
99
Recovery
107.0
101.0
101.0
101.0
101.0
101.0
97.0
96.0
Average
104.0
102.0
102.0
102.0
100.0
100.0
98.0
98.0
Blank
ND 5
ND 5
ND 5
ND 5
ND 5
ND 5
ND 5
ND 5
Locations
1,5,228
22E
1,4,228 •
1. 13, 18, 22E
1.5, 228, 22E
1 , 228, 22E
1,13, 15, 18,228, 22E
11
QA duplicates
Duplicate
Field
Lab
Location
SS1
SS11
SS22BOR
SS22EOR
Test
C3R1
C1 R3
C3R2
~~ C1R1
C3R3
C1R3
C1R1
C1R3
C3R1
Value
13.6
66.5
37.8
102.0
205.0
12.3
32.7
62.2
216.0
Duplicate
45900.0
46.9
98.8
105.0
205.0
18.4
22.9
126.0
151.0
•
RPD (%)
200
35
89
3
0
40
35
68
35
All values reported in ug/l (ppb)
ND: Not detected, PQL reported
1: SS1 - Waste water
4: SS4 - Caustic
5: SS5 - Scrubber make-up water
11: SS11 - Reactor grit
13: SS13 - Scrubber decant water
1.5: SS15 - Reformed gas condensate
18: SS18 - Heat exchanger residue
22B: SS22 8OR - Scrubber liquor (Beginning of run)
22E: SS22 EOR - Scrubber liquor (End of run)
A4-129
-------
TABLE A4-44. ULTIMATE ANALYSIS QA/QC ACTIVITIES
Batch
description
C1R1
C3R1
SS22
Sample type •
Laboratory spike
'
Laboratory spike
Laboratory duplicate
• . i
Compound
Carbon
Hydrogen
Nitrogen
Chlorine
Carbon
Hydrogen
Nitrogen
Chlorine
Carbon
Hydrogen
Nitrogen
Chlorine
Ftourine
Phosphate
Oxygen
Recovery (%) or
RPD (%)
101
94 -
94
.122
94
72
100
96
1.4
17.6
0
73.2
0
0
18.2
A4-130
-------
TABLE A4-45. TOTAL ORGANIC CARBON QA RESULTS
Laboratory control spikas
Test
C1R1
C1R2
C1R3
C3R1
C3R2
C3R3
Recovery
102
100
100
98
100
100
100
101
Recovery
,H,Mj
100
107
107
107
105
108
Average
102
100
100
103
104
104
103
105
Blank
NO 1
ND 1
ND 1
ND 1
ND 1
ND 1
ND 1
ND 1
Locations
; 1
i 22E
1,228
1.13, 18.22E
1 . 22B, 22E
: 1,228, 22E
1.13, 15, 18, 22B, 22E
11
QA duplicates
Duplicate
Field
Lab
Location
SS1
SS1
Test
C1R3
C1R1
C1R3"
C3R3
Value
8.86
21.90
9.07
36.30
9.07
21.50
.8.76
36.50
RPD (%)
2.3
1.8
3.5
0.5
All values reported In mg/1
ND: Not detected, PQL/10 reported
° Lab duplicate of field duplicate
1: SS1 - Waste water
11: SS11 - Reactor grit
13: SS13 - Scrubber decant water
15: SS1S - Reformed gas condensate
18: SS18- Heat exchanger residua
22B: SS22BOR - Scrubber liquor (Beginning of run)
22E: SS22 EOR - Scrubber liquor (End of run) !
A4-131
-------
TABLE A4-46. ORGANIC HALOGEN, TOTAL ORGANIC CARBON, ASH, TOTAL SULFUR, AND TOTAL HALOGEN
QA RESULTS
Analysts
Organic halogens
Total organic carbon
Total sulfur
Total halogens
Ash
QC sample type
Lab duplicates
Lab control spikes
Field duplicate
Lab duplicates
Lab control spikes
Field duplicate
Lab duplicates
Lab control spikes
Field duplicate
Lab duplicates
Lab control spikes
Lab duplicates
Lab control spikes
Test condition
and run
number
C2R1
C2R2
C2R1
C2R2
C2R2
C2R1
C2R2
C2R1
C2R2
C2R1
C2R2
C2R1
C2R1
C2R2
C2R2
C2R1
C2R1
C2R2
C2R1
C2R2
C2R1
C2R2
Sample location
SS3
SS5
SSI 3
SS5, SS22, SS24
SS3
SS13, SS22, SS24
SS11
SS3
SS3
SS10
SS22, SS24
SS3
SS13, SS22, SS24
SS3.SS10
SS11
SS3
SS13
SS3
All
All
SS3
SS3
All
All
SS3
SS3 -
All
All
Units
ppm
ppb
ppb
ppb
ppm
PPb
ppm
ppm
ppm
ppm
ppm
ppm
ppm
ppm
ppm
%
%
%
%
%
%CI
%CI
%Ci
%CI
%
%
%
%
Sample
392
44
65
5.33
2.58
5.02
214
18100
19500
4920
10.4
1860
10.4
1942
1980
ND
0.0026
NO
1.11
0.99
0.34
0.04
0.2
0.18
62.4
55
7.97
7.8
Duplicate/
spike
407
58.7
55.2
5
2.5
5
200
18500
21900
4350
•10
2000
10
2000
2000
ND
0.0031
ND
1
1
0.05
0.04
0.2
0.18
60
56
8.22
8.22
RPD/Recovery
(%)
3.8
28.6
16.3
107
103
105
107
2.2
11.6
12.3
104
93
104
97
99
ND
17.5
ND
111
99
148.7
0
100
100
3.9
1.8
97
94.9
ND - Not detected
-------
TABLE 4-47. ADDITIONAL QA/QC RESULTS
Laboratory control spikes
Species
Ash
Total sulfur
Heating value
Ultimate analysis
Units
(%)
(%)
(BTU/lb)
Carbon (%)
Hydrogen (%)
Nitrogen (%)
Chlorine (%)
Recovery
C1R1
99
112
92
101
94
94
122
C3R1
99
112
95
94
72
100
96
QA duplicates
Species
Inorganic halogen
Total halogens
Total sulfur
Ultimate analysis
Ultimate analysis
Density
Units
ppm
ppm
(%)
(%)
Carbon (%)
Hydrogen (%)
Nitrogen (%)
Chlorine (%)
Fluorine (%)
Phosphate (%)
Oxygen (%)
Carbon (%)
Hydrogen (%)
Nitrogen (%)
Chlorine {%)
Fluorine (%)
Phosphate (%)
Oxygen (%)
g/cc
Location
SSI
SS2
SS2
SS22
SS2
SS22
SS22
Duplicate
Field
Field
Field
Lab
Field
Lab
Lab
Value
1900
21.66
0.56
NO 0.01
62.06
7.78
0.04
10.45 '
ND 0.01
NO 0.01
19.09
5.03
1259
0.01
0.10
ND 0.01
ND 0.01
8227
1.02
Duplicate
1800
17.81
1.75
ND 0.01
61.17
928
0.04
4.85
ND 0.01
ND 0.01
22.91
4.95
11.58
0.01
0.11
ND 0.01
ND 0.01
83.35
1.02
RPD {%)
5.4
19.5
100.4
0.0
1.4
17.6
0.0
732
0.0
0.0
182
1.6
8.4
0.0
6.6
0.0
0.0
1.3
0.0
ND
Not detected
Ash Audit
Sample
1034
3057
EPA auoft Value (%)
7.5
13.4
Analysis value (%)
729
1323
A4-133
-------
ten*
(Q
3
i
E? O
5T O
8
Isokenitic Rate (%)
S1
-------
Percent Moisture
oo o o
I
-a
c
5
M
o
£
5"
r*
t t f
5 11
§• o
Condition 1 - Run 1
Condition 1 - Run 2
Condition 1 • Run 3
Condition 2 - Run 1
Condition 2 - Run 2
Condition 3 - Run 1
Condition 3 - Run 2
Condition 3 - Run 3
'
*>
m
•
i
•
•
»
• •
w
••
-
•
mm>
• •
•
»
-------
(0
c
1
g
(0
3
a
£.
o
e»
H H H
£ § s 8 § s
Condition 1 - Run 1
Condition 1 - Run 2
Condition 1 - Run 2
Condition 1 - Run 3
Condition 2 -Runl
Condition 2 - Run 2
Condition 3 - Run 1
Condition 3 - Run 2
Condition 3 - Run 3
Span Drift (%)
i. ^ ' , |5> ro -vi
3«ncnuiooi
0.
1
•
O I
>
>m
DOC
» c
-
i *^
3
MK
•
•
1 O
a
V
o
-------
3
03
?
o
a
5
HH-H
O M
8 § 8
S
Zero Drift (%)
o in
-------
7.5-
5-
2.5-
a?
« 0-
i
-23-
-7.5-
-10-
A
O
§
'
Condition 1 Condition 2
D
g
A
O
Condition 3
-ffl-
-«-
-^~
-B-
-e-
-e-
02
CO2
CO
NOx
S02
THC
Figure A4-5. OEM bias results.
M-138
-------
EQUIPMENT CALIBRATIONS - VOST
A4-139
-------
IMET-EER, a division of Canadeer Ltd.
GAS METER CALIBRATION SHEET
ISOTRAIN: VOST#2
DATE: SEPTEMBER 24, 1992
ROTAMETER
READING
15.00
20.00
25.00
GAS METER READING
START
(L)
363.000
399.200
522.000
STOP
(L)
373.200
429.050
545.000
NET
(L)
10.20
29.85
23.00
GASOMETER
READING
(mm)
31.000
89.000
68,000
VOLUME
(L)
10.099
28.994
22.152
SAMPLE
TIME
(sec)
1831
2080
1188
TEMPERATURE
GAS
METER
(F)
82
93
102
GASO-
METER
(F)
68
70
72
BAROMETER
PRESSURE _
(inH2O)
29.82
29.82
29.82
VOLUME
Vstd.m
METER
(Std.L)
10.072
28.889
21.903
Vstd.Sld
STANDARD
(Sld.L)
10.237
29.278
22.286
SAMPLING
RATE
(Std.L/M)
0.330
0.833
1.106
Yds
1.016
1.013
1.017
Y, AVG. 1.016
-------
IMET-EER, a division of Canacleer Lid.
GAS METRR CALIBRATION SHEET
ISOTRAIN: VOST #2
PATE: DECEMBER 16, 1992
10TAMETEP
READING
10.00
10.00
10.00
GAS METER READING
START
(L)
911.940
919.910
932.060
STOP
(L)
• 918.260
932.060
913.600
NET
(L)
6.32
12.15
11.54
GASOMETER
READING
(mm)
21.000
35.000
35.000
VOLUME
(L)
6.841
11.402
11.402
SAMPLE
TIME
(sec)
2028
4045
3901
TEMPERATURE
GAS
METER
(F)
80
85
85
GASO-
METER
(F)
67
67
68
BAROMETER
PRESSURE
(inH2O)
30
29.82
29.85
VOLUME
Vsfd.m
METER
{StdL)
6.302
11.932
11.344
Vstd.std
STANDARD
(Std.L)
6.990
11.580
11.569
SAMPLING
RATE
(Std.UM)
0.186
0.177
0.174
Yds
1.109
0.970
1.020
Y.AVG =
1.033
-------
VOST THERMOCOUPLE CALIBRATIONS
Octobers, 1992
VOST #1 - Dry Gas Meter Outlet Thermocouple
VOST #2 - Dry Gas Meter Outlet Thermocouple
Calibrator:
A4-142
-------
DICKMUNNS COMPANY
,n^'",f "r"d C" ' Flowm«« Calibration Service
10571 Calle Lee - 133 . LOI Atamitos, California 90720
Telephone (213) 596-1559 . Telefax (714) S27-0823
CERTIFICATE OF CALIBRATION
:ntName: HER
erence Number: "V-iCfa* M
rument Manufacturer: SINGER
rument Description: PD METER
del Number: 802
ial Number: 8132
ed Accuracy: +/- 5%
/~ ,-._ •
Ca hbranon Dale:
9^rat,on Due:
iven:
AS RECEIVED
NIST Traccab.l.ty Per:
Ambient Conditions:
'
08-06-1992.
08-06-1993
^? 14'7 PSIA 70F
A~3
K-0122
29.92»HGA 70F RH.45%
EER8132
IND.SLPM ACT.SLPM
2
3
4
5
«
I
8
9
0.200
0.300
0.400
0.600
0.80,0
1'000
200
1-500
0.199
0.299
0.399
0.599
0.799
0.998
1.496
larks:
oration Performed Bv-
.
Approved By:
A4-143
-------
EQUIPMENT CALIBRATIONS - HCL TRAINS
A4-144
-------
IMET-EER, a division of Canadeer Ltd.
GAS METER CALIBRATION SHEET (EPA Method)
ISOTRAIN: ORANGE CONTROL BOX
DATE: SEPTEMBER 21 1992
PRESSURE
-------
WDl-PRNDENT MRASURRMRNT AND TRCHNOLOGY
GAS MHTEK CALmKATION SHEUT
O RANGK CONTROL BOX
DECEMBER J5/92. 1990
DATE'
ORIRCE
PRESSURE
.j!P.li?Pl_;
073
073
0.73
GAS M
START
I^«3>:.
12366
12602
1 28,38
ETEHRE
STOP
hPtS)
12602
12838
130.67
ADING
NET
=(»»>
2.36
_2.36
2.30
r -GASOI
BEADING
: (mm).
203.50!
206.90
203 60*
JETER ;...
VOLUME
l«3)
2.34
2.38
- 2.34
1 SAMPLE
TIME
(ssjd
303
307
299
TEMPE
GAS
METER
.,: (F)
60
60
60
MATURE
GASO-
METER
; .:
67
67
BAROMETER
PHESSUnE
CatfapJ
30.00
30 OO
STAMOAR
GAS
METER
-J59F)
2.H43
2.449
2.383
r
i
3 VOLUME
GASO-
METER
(SCF)
2.391
2.431
2.393
SAMPLING
RATE
JSCFM)
0484
0.479
0476
ALPHA
FACTOR
0970
0.9S3
1.003
AVBRAGF, ALPHA VALUE : 0.992
-------
/" \.
ice BA.TI-I
43
- i
A4-147
37
37
-------
:i'iij»jr.-|n
f.ZS'0- »OS-1 onj-K OOS'I
WO- ZOVZ nmj-17 OB>"2
Bin- 9«'£ ODITSB OOS"I
Cozirm)
'A3S i!0D>iJH »-U-IAriHlH 3M3H2N3VH
;iHTOiRD7ll C
HUH Mumn - HJVSI
BSD't- HOUV1A30 3S«S.W
o«y»- iwn nss'i swo
W/5T- 191-C 001'7 SSl'O
•-•ra-l- OVt"0 n09'9 S5Z-0
rsfz two onz-B osr~o
COZH-UU
•A30 JN3Dg3d M13HONVH
g
n£V. B^'O OZ'Jl £J'0
ws '? OP' 19 £7'e
HO'l 9T'£ Oli'BB DS'E
;n-2 iz-7 oovni o£'»
COW!) CO.1!™") (OZH*U!>
•A30 JH33»3il >313>I9NVM 3I13H3K9W
6t919tlDn *
3I13H3N9VW 3anSS3Sd K9IH - IIIVJU M3389
isram
a
S33 • 13HI
-------
EQUIPMENT CALIBRATIONS - SVOC TRAINS
A4-149-
-------
I-
8
IMET-EER, a division of Canadeer Ltd.
GAS METER CALIBRATION SHEET (EPA Method)
ISOTRAIN: GREEN CONTROL BOX
DATE: .SEPTEMBER 21 1992
IORIRCE
PRESSURE
(inH2O)
0.50
1.00
1.50
2.00
2.SO
3.00
FIELD METER READIN
START
«t3)
490.32
495.62
499.23
506.23
509.75
518.72
STOP
(K3)
492.02
497.32
500.92
507.94
511.53
520.43
:NET
Va.m
(f!3)
.70
.70
.70
.71
.78
.71
GASOMETER
READING
(mm)
151.0
150.5
152.0
152.0
158.5
154.0
VOLUME
Va.Std
(ft3)
.74
.73
.75
.75
1.B?
SAMPLE
TIME
(sec)
264
172
134
116
107
1.7, 95
TEMPERATURE
FIELD
METER
(F)
60
60
60
60
60
60
GASO-
METER
(F)
68
68
68
68
68
69
BAROMETE
PRESSURE
(inHg)
29.15
29.15
29.15
29.15
29.15
29.15
VOLUME
Vstd.m
(SCF)
1.658
1.659
1.659
1.676
1.741
1.682
Vstd.std
(SCF)
.666
.661
.677
.677
.749
.696
SAMPLE
RATE
Qstd.m
(SCFM)
0.377
0.579
0.743
0.867
0.976
1.062
Yds
1.005
1.001
1.011
1.001
1.004
1.009
dH @
.984 1
.696
.513
.512
.479
.488
dH@ =
Y.AVG
I.6I2
1.005
-------
INDEPENDENT MEASUREMENT AND TECHNOLOGY
GAS KfETER CALIBRATION SIIFP.T
ISOTRAIN: GREEN CONTROL BOX
DATE: DECEMBER 15/92, 1990
I
Ul
ORIFICE..--;
PRESSURE
• ..: ';•';'•'.
fmH2O) ;
0.80
0.80
080
QA3M
START
:(lt3J"
1 83.94
• 87.99
189.96
ETEB^E
5$;
•:;•«&;!:
189.89
189.98
182.33
MMNGl •: GASOft
NET 1 READING
(
67
67
67
BAROMETER
PRESSURE
-------
IMET-EER, a division of Canadeer Ltd.
GAS METER CALIBRATION SHEET
ISOTRAIN: YELLOW CONTROL BOX
DATE: SEPTEMBER 30. 1992
ORIFICE
PRESSURE
(inH2O)
0.50
1.00
1.50
2.00
2.50
3.00
3.50
4.00
4.50
5.00
FIELD U
START
(113)
ETERHE
STOP
(t!3)
536.00 537.50
537.60 539.20
539.30
540r90
542.50
544.10
545.70
547.30
548.90
550.50
540.80
542.40
544.00
545.60
547.20
548.80
550.40
:ADIN
NET
Va.m
.m.
1.50
1.60
1.50
1.50
1.50
1.50
1.50
1.50
1.50
552.00 I 1.50
GASOMETER
READING; VOLUME
; Va.sld
(mm) i (113)
129.6
139.0
130.0
.49
.60
.50
133.5! .54
130.4
.50
130.6 j .50
131.0 t 1.51
129.8
134.0
133.2
1.49
1.54
1.53
SAMPLE
TIME
(sec)
229
172
133
115
103
94
88
83
77
73
TEMPERATURE
FIELD 'GASO-
METER; METER
(R : (F)
60 66
60 66
60 66
60, 66
60- 66
60 66
60 66
60 66
60 66
60 66
BAROMETE
PRESSURE
(inHg)
30.18
30.18
30.18
30.18
30.18
30.18
30.18
VOLUM
Vstd,«n
1.S31
E
Vstd.sid
(SCF)
.466
.594
.491
.531
.495
.498
.502
.488
.537
.527
SAMPLE
RATE
Qstd.m
(SCFM)
0.397
Yds
0.981
0.564 ; 3.985
0.696
0.793
0.887
0.973
1.040
1.104
0.9B2
1-007
0.982
0.983
0.984
0.974
1.192 ' 1.005
1.259 : 0.997
dH@
.812
.778
.768
.723
.811
.804
834
.899
.725
.744 !
R
dH@= 1.790
Y.AVG 0.988
-------
IMET-EER
GAS METER CALIBRATION SHEET
ISOTHAIN: YELLOW CONTROL BOX
DATE: DECEMBER 17, 1992
%
ORIFICE
PRESSURE
JinH2O)
GAS METFn ncAniM " /*.„„. i
START
(ft3)
1.00 :392.40
O.SO 394.51
STOP
i_JH3) I
394.51J
396.62
2.00 1 396.62 | 398 71 [
NET
J»13)
2.To
2.11
U«OUI
READING
-PSS9
176.5
177.0
c.lUJ 178.0
UbltH
•'VOLUME
(f!3)
2.03
204
2.05
ISAMPLE
TIME
(sec) J
316
TEMPE
GAS
METER
(F)
60
RATURE
GASO-
METER
(F)
67
BAROMETE
PRESSURE
(inH2O)
29.84
60 -5L_ 29.84
^TANDAR
GAS
METER
2.17Z
2.178
2.16JJ
0 VOLUME
GASO-
METER
-------
jr_ 8. VS.
""0
tit
nt
til
in
it.
-Tf
1C
Jf
cc
r-o
fo
"* ''9
TO
/••&»
T45
1 -O
tn
111
Ift.
I'll
in
in
O'l
IV
fcZ?
CS9
-JL
*>ai-LOVtl->* J ' VJ
-------
mei - EER
HAiagHEUc S-comr C*UBKAUUM
BAIE: AUGUST 20 1992
CHEEH TRAIH - MI6H PRESSURE MA6NEHEUC
* (SO.1ttl.C19
KAGMEHELIC MANOMETER PEKCEHf OI-V
(iil.U20)
4-30 107.00 4.21 Z.Uf
3-5a as.-io 3.is ,.oz
2-4S .41.00 2.40 i.02
1>3S 37.20 1.46 s.aj
°-SS '2-29 0.48 y.3u
AV6SAKU OtViAIIUM 4.US
CREEM IRilM - IOU PKtKSIXC WUiNI!.l£LtC
S S50S171SS
HAGNEHEUC MANOHEIER PERCENf U£V.
CIn.H203
-------
Whe.r«:
NOZZLE CALIBRATION
A4-156
-------
NOZZLE CALm RATION
Samp|« Location; ; ~fs/i
"
Wh«f«:
Dt.02,03 - nozzfe
Accuracy within O.ooi hi.
In
03
A4-157
-------
EQUIPMENT CALIBRATIONS - METALS TRAINS
A4-158
-------
iiHTOTT CALCULATIONS AND DATA SHEHT
Slarulard Idenrificalion (S/N):
Standard Dry Gas Meier Coefficient 0 9984
Held l*y Gas Mclcrr.D. (S/N):
Barometric Pressure Obar):
Ambient Temperature (degrees F):
-
Calibrated ByandyFuriong
Calihralion Type: Semi Annuul x
icmp.uut (Meier R
«mp.0ut JMeterReadiii
2.162
832.544
834.713
Averjg
Total
Start
End
Avcrag
Total
1.552
176J23
T7T672
-------
-I
§
Standard Identification (S/N):
Standard Dry Gas Meter Coefficient:
Reid Dry Gas Meter F.D. (S/N):
Buromelric Pressure (Pbar):
Amhicnl Temperature (degree! F):
961437
0 9984
N!
29 36
80
Bate: 2l-Sep-92
Calibrated By.imly Furlong
Calibration Type: Senif Annual
Post-test
-------
iUadjflJ Wwiti/icutioiKS/Nj:
I
O)
Approximate
cfm
as Meier
Average Mete
Tcmp.,Tw
(degrees 1s)
8
Barometric Pressure fPbar): 29 36
Ambicnl Temperature (degrees F); 80
2a,sid and Qa.m = Volume/nme
Md.Std = Qa.sid * Ystd • (52Q/(Tw-Hl60)) • fl'bar/29 92)
Held Dry Gat Meier ID
orrected Iiowra
Qstd.m
(scfm)
(Yds,uuw
Yds.max)
-------
DICKMUNNS COMPANY
Liquid and Cos • Flowmeter Calibration Service
10571 CaJIe Lee - 133 « Lot Atamitos, California 90720
Telephone (213) 596-1559 • Telefax (714) 827-0323
CERTIFICATE OF CALIBRATION
CUeniName: E.E.R. Calibration Date: 09-10-1992
Reference Number: 462160 Calibration Due: 09-10-1993
iMtnunent Manufacturer: ROCKWELL Calibration Fluid: AIR 14.7 PSIA 7 OF
fuinuncnt Description: P.D.METER TestUnit(i): A-6 3
Kodel Number S-275 MIST Traeeability Per: M-0122
Serial Number: 462160 Ambient Conditions: 29.92"HGA 70F RH.44%
Rated Accuracy: +/-1* DataRle: 462160
Accuracy Gnvrn WITHIN MFG. TOLERANCE
IND.SCFM ACT.SCFM
1 0.300 0.300 l>°
2 0,500 0.500
3 Oo700 0.700
4 1.000 1»000
5 2..250 1.250 ^
6 1.500 1.486 0
Rcmarb:
All instruments used in the performance of the above calibration have direct traceabiHty to the National Insti-
•lute Of Standards and Technology (NIST). Calibration has been performed ia accordance with MIL-STD-
Calibration Performed By: Approved By.
^^a^X/
MICHAEL MUNNS MICHAEL MUNNS
• CXRTl
A4-162
-------
tX
3 f/=- 3 V;
y . c_
6V-
/ a
* ^— **
j-
3 -
A/ 3,
o -5
f f
3
3 -
A4-163
-------
Page
NOZZLE CALIBRATION
Sample Location:
Plant :
Inspector:
Oats:
Tima:
Nozzla
Idtniffcation
Number
Whcr*:
°n
0(avg).avo 0*01.02. 03
A4-164
-------
IMET-EER
PITOT TUBE CALIBRATION REPORT
PITOT ID- 2 FOOTER
DATE - OCTOBER , 1992
FAN SPEED
STANDARD PROBE
PITOT PITOT
(mm H2O) (mm H2O)
0
20
30
40
SO
60
0.00
1.10
2.60
4.70
7.30
9.60
0.00
1.80
4.10
7.20
11.20
15.00
PITOT FACTOR Cp = 0.803
a foot
PITOT OP <>nm MZO>
A4-165
-------
EQUIPMENT CALIBRATIONS - PROCESS WEIGHT SCALES
A4-166
-------
THEORY
o
43.9
87.8
131.8
175.7
219.6
263.5
307.4
351.36
395.28
439.2
483.12
527.04
570.96
SCALE
0
43.0
85.8
128.8
171.3
214.3
257.3
300.8
344
387
429.75
472.25
514.75
557.25
, Regression Output:
Constant
Std Err of Y Est
R Squared
No." of Observations
Degrees of Freedom
. 0
0.431997
0.999994
14
13
X Coefficient(s)
Std Err of Coef.
1.023216
0.000351
TR EORY = 1,023 x SCALE READING
600
500
400
300
200
100
0
SCALE #1 CALIBRATION
THEORETICAL = 1 .023 x SCAI F
— (
^
0
X
or
X
n
X
>« /"I
x
f\
^
100 -~~ 300 ~*UVJ
SCALE READING
0 READINGS
500
600
A4-167
-------
•EORy SCALE
0
43.9
Q7.Q
131.8
175.7
219-6
283.5
SO7.4
3M1.36
395.3
^39.2
983.1
527.0
571.0
0
43.0
86.0
129.0
171.5
214.5
257.0
300.0
343
386
430
473.5
515
555.5
Regression Output:
Constant o
Std Err of Y Est 0.844042
R Squared 0.999978
No. of Observations 14
Degrees of Freedom 13
X Coefficients)
Std Err of Coef.
1.023895
0.000687
Y = 1.024 x SCALE READING
600
500
'400
300
200
100
0
0 100 200 ;300 400 500 600
SCALE READING
° READINGS
A4-168
-------
EQUIPMENT CALIBRATIONS - PROCESS GAS SAMPLING
A4-169
-------
TC. 4f O-3
>L-,* C"-)
*fl
fly > /><,
: *..
>^
*
O-3
C- /
C-2.
C-l
.
/c
JUj
33
3JT
i;. s:
M.S
21.1
3I.X
31.1
3/.X
3/. *
3/. S
c j3<»r«
rc
3 ;
35"
JJ.6
J/.?
3/.fe
3/. r
II. S-
3/.4
3/.0
3/'?
A
-Z.
^
-. 1.
^
-.1
^
-.3
-. J
-•'
xoo« r.
f*i
11
70
t,*;8
7/.1
7/. x
70.1
71. *•
7o 9
•7
71- 1
71. i.
70.')
rt
t8
C7
7«.i
7/.-J
7/.S-
1/-7
70. 1
7<0
*
- 3
- 3
•• 1
*.7
«-. 6
'.C
• f
'.3
-. 1
>*
a««.,v4 M^O
*
-------
south Harbor BTvd
fabra, CA
n: Bernie Ortmanu
DATE 9-28-92
VoiceG 10)694-5504
Fax<3lO)890-7181 '
HER
: Andy
Tube Data
Fax:
The enclosed tube data is for the conditions supplied to us as
I the ones you will see at your sight. Rather than trying to run
sheets for every combination at 4 different temperatures, you will
corection factors below. Multiply ehe now from ^ ^ ^
actor below for the appropriate temperature in order to derive
actual flow.
1.000
0.972
0.962
0.954
•*,
e Ortmann
A4-171
-------
14
J621 0.0189 STD.CU.FT./MIN. gas
R-215-B
Spherical
CARBOLOY
1 ATMOS. & 70'
5.
10-05-1992
14.7 PSI
60.0 DEG.F
10.0 IM.WCG
0.00015 GMS/CC
14.95000 GMS/CC
0.11750 SP.GR.(GAS)
0.00905 cP
0.6621
0.6593
0.6565
0.6536
0.6508
0.6479
0.6450
0.6421
0.6392
0.6362
0.6332
0.6302
0.6271
0.6239
0.6207
0.6175
0.6140
0.6105
0.6070
0.6035
0.5999
0.5963
0.5928
0.5892
0.5857
0.5822
0.5787
0.5752
0.5718
0.5685
0.5652
O.~619
'». S586
0.5553
0.5521
0.5488
0.5455
0.5422
0.5389
0.5355
110.0
109.0
108.0
107.0
106.0
105.0
104.0
103.0
102.0
101.0
100.0
99.0
98.0
97.0
96.0
95.0
94.0
93.0
92.0
91.0
90.0
89.0
88.0
87.0
86.0
85.0
84.0
83.0
82.0
81.0
80.0
79.0
78.0
77.0
76.0
75.0
74.0
73.0
72.0
71.0
0.5321
0.5286
0.5251
0.5215
0.5178
0.5140
0.5100
0.5060
0.5019
0.4978
0.4937
0.4895
0.4854
0.4812
0.4771
0.4729
0.4688
0.4647
0.4607
0.4567
0.4527
0.4486
0.4446
0.4406
0.4366
0.4325
0.4285
0.4245
0.4205
0.4164
0.4123
0.4082
0.4041
0.3999
0.3957
0.3915
0.3872
0.3829
0.3785
0.3741
70.0
69.0
68.0
67.0
66.0
65.0
64.0
63.0
62.0
61.0
60.0
59.0
58.0
57.0
56.. 0
55.0
54 .,0
53.0
52.0
51.0
50.0
49.0
48.0
47.0
46.0
45.0
44.0
43.0
42.0
41.0
40.0
39.0
38.0
37.0
36.0
35.0
34.0
33.0
32.0
31.0
J0.3697
i0.3653
0.3609
0.3564
0.3519
0.3474
0.3428
0.3383
0.3337
0.3291
0.3244
0.3196
0.3147
0.3098
0.3049
0.3000
0.2951
0.2901
0.2851
0.2801
0.2750
0.2699
0.2648
0.2597
0.2546
0.2494
0.2441
0.2387
0.2333
0.2279
0.2225
0.2171
0.2116
0.2062
0.2008
0.1954
0.1900
0. 1846
0.1792
0.1739
30.0
29.0
28.0
27.0
26.0
25.0
24.0
23.0
22.0
21.0
20.0
19.0
18.0
17.0
16.0
15.0
14.0
13.0
12.0
11.0
10.0
9.0
8.0
7.0
6.0
5.0
0.1685
0.1632
0.1578
0.1524
0.1471
0.1417
0.1362
0.1307
0.1252
0.1196
0.1139
0.1082
0.1024
0.0965
0.0904
0.0843
0.0779
0.0715
0.0650
0.0534
0.0519
0.0453
0.0387
0.0321
0.0255
0.0189
A4-172
-------
EER9
05 0.0013 STD.CU.FT./MIN..GAS
R-215-AAA
Spherical
CARBOLOY
1 ATMOS. & 70'F
1.
EER9
09-28-1992
14.7 PSI
60.0 DEG.F
10.0 IN.WCG
0.00015 GMS/CC
14.95000 GMS/CC
0.11800 SP.GR.(GAS)
0.00905 cP
0.0205
0.0203
0.0202
0.0201
0.0199
0.0198
0.0197
0.0195
0.0194
0.0192
0.0191
0.0189
0.0187
0.0186
0.0184
0.0182
0.0180
0.0178
6.0176
0.0174
0.0172
0.0170
0.0168
0.0166
0.0164
0.0162
0.0160
0.0158
0.0156
0.0154
0.0153
0.0151
0.0149
0.0147
0.0146
0.0144
0.0142
0.0140
0.0139
0.0137
110.0
109.0
108.0
107.0
106.0
105.0
104.0
103.0
102.0
101.0
100.0
99.0
98.0
97.0
96.0
95.0
94.0
93.0
92.0
91.0
90.0
89.0
88.0
87.0
86.0
85.0
84.0
83.0
82.0
81.0
80.0
79.0
78.0
77.0
76.0
75.0
74.0
73.0
72.0
71.0
0.0135
0.0133
0.0132
0.0130
0.0128
0.0126
0.0125
0.0123
0.0121
0.0119
0.0118
0.0116
0.0114
0.0113
0.0111
0.0109
0.0108
0.0106
0.0105
0.0103
0.0102
0.0100
0.0099
0.0098
0.0097
0.0095
0.0094
0.0093
0.0091
0.0090
0.0089
0.0088
0.0086
0.0085
0.0083
0.0082
0.0080
0.0079
0.0077
0.0076
70.0
69.0
68.0
67.0
66.0
65.0
64.0
63.0
62.0
61.0
60.0
59.0
58.0
57.0
56.0
55.0
54.0
53.0
52.0
51.0
50.0
49.0
48.0
47.0
46.0
45.0
44.0
43.0
42.0
41.0
40.0
39.0
38.0
37.0
36.0
35.0
34.0
33.0
32.0
31.0
0.0074
0.0072
0.0071
0.0069
0.0068
0.0066
0.0065
0.0064
0.0062
0.0061
0.0060
0.0059
0.0058
0.0057
0.0056
0.0055
0.0054
0.0053
0.0052
0.0051
0.0050
0.0049
0.0048
0.0047
0.0046
0.0045
0.0044
0. 0043
0. 0042
0.0041
0. 0040
0.0039
0.0037
0. 0036
0. 0036
0.0035
0. 0034
0.0033
0.0032
0.0031
30.0
29.0
28.0
27.0
26.0
25.0
24.0
23.0
22.0
21.0
20.0
19.0
18.0
17.0
16.0
15.0
14.0
13.0
12.0
11.0
10.0
9.0
8.0
7.0
6.0
5.0
0.0030
0.0030
0.0029
0.0028
0.0028
0.0027
0.0026
0.0026
0.0025
0.0024
0.0024
0.0023
0.0022
0.0022
0.0021
0.0020
0.0019
0.0019
0.0018
0.0017
0.0017
0.0016
0.0015
0.0014
0^0014
0.0013
A4-173
-------
12
0.5360 0.0092 STD.L/MIN.
R-215-D
Spherical
SAPPHIRE
1 ATMOS. & 70'
3.
AfR
10-05-1992
14.7 PSI
60.0 DEG.F
10.0 IN.WCG
0.00125 GMS/CC
3.98000 GMS/CC
C -J120 GMS/CC
C 785 cP
0.0
9.0
8.0
7.0
6.0
S.O
4.0
3.0
2.0
1.0
0.0
9.0
8.0
7.0
6.0
5.0
4.0
3.0
2.0
1.0
0.0
3.0
3.0
7.0
6.0
5.0
4.0
3.0
2.0
1.0
3.0
9.0
3.0
7.0
5.0
5.0
1.0
J.O
i.O
L.O
0.5360
0.5318
0.5276
0.5234
0.5192
0.5150
0.5108
0.5066
0.5023
0.4981
0.4939
0.4896
0.4854
0.4811
0.4769
0.4726
0.4682
0.4639
0.459S
0.4552
0.4S09
0.4466
0.4422
0.4380
0.4337
0.4294
0.4252
0.4211
0.4169
0.4128
0.4088
0.4048
0.4009
0.3970
0.3931
0.3892
0.3853
0.3813
0.3773
0.3732
110.0
109.0
108.0
107.0
306.0
105.0
104.0
103.0
102.0
101.0
100.0
99.0
98.0
97.0
96.0
95.0
94.0
93.0
92.0
9T.O
90.0
By .0
88.0
87.0
86.0
85.0
84.0
83.0
82.0
81.0
80.0
79.0
78.0
77.0
76.0
75. 0
74.0
73.0
72.0
71.0
0.3691
0.3648
0.3605
0.3562
0.3517
0.3470
0.3421
0.3372
0.3322
0.3271
0.3221
0.3170
0.3119
0.3068
0.3017
0.2967
0.2917
0.2868
0.2819
0.2771
0.2724
0.2676
0.2629
.0.2583
0.2536
0.2490
0.2444
0.2399
0.2354
0.2309
0.2264
0.2220
0.2176
0.2132
0.2088
0.2044
0.2003
0.1962
0.1922
o.iaai
70.0
69.0
68.0
67.0
66.0
65.0
64.0
63.0
62 .0
61.0
60.0
59.0
58. 0
57.0
56.0
SS.O
54.0
53.0
52.0
51.0
5U.O
49.0
48.0
47.0
46.0
45.0
44.0
43.0
42.0
41.0
40.0
39.0
38.0
37.6
36.0
35.0
34.0
33.0
32.0
31.0
0.1841
0.1801
0.1760
0.1720
0.1680
0. 1640
0.1600
0.1559
0.1519
0.1479
0.1438
0.1398
0.1358
0.1318
0.1278
0.1238
0.1199
0.1160
0,1121
0.1082
0.104b
0.1007
0.0970
0.0934
0.0899
0.0864
0.0832
0.0800
0.0769
0.0738
0.0708
0.0679
0.0650
0.0622
0.0594
0.0567
0.0540
0.0514
0. 0488
0.0464
30.0
29.0
28.0
27.0
26.0
25.0
24.0
23.0
22.0
21.0
20.0
19.0
18.0
17.0
16.0
15.0
14.0
13.0
12.0
11.0
10.0
9.0
8.0
•7:"0
6.0
5.0
.0.0439
0.0420
0.0401
0.0383
0.0365
0.0347
0.0331
0.0314
0.0298
0.0282
0.0267
0.0252
0.0237
0.0222
0.0208
0.0194
0.0183
0.0173
0.0162
0.0152
0.0142
0.0132
. 0.0122
0.0112
0.0102
0.0092
A4-174
-------
5995 0.0115 STD.CU.FT./MIN. AIR
R-615-A '
Spherical
316 SS
1 ATMOS. & 70'F
7,
EER3
09-28-1992
14.7 PSI
60.0 DEG.F
10.0 IN.WCG
0.00125 GMS/CC
8.04000 GMS/CC
0.00120 GMS/CC
0.01785 cP
3 0.5995
3 0.5959
3 0.5923
3 0.5887
3 0.5851
3 0-.5815
3 0.5778
3 0.5742
3 0.5705
3 0.5668
J 0.5631
) 0.5594
) 0.5556
> 0.5519
J 0.5481
' 0.5442
> 0.5403
' 0.5363
' 0.5323
1 0.5283
1 0.5243
0.5202
0.5162
0.5121
0.5081
0.5040
0.5000
0.4959
0.4918
0.4878
0.4837
0.4796
0.4754
0.4713
0.4671
0.4630
0.4589
0.4547
0.4506
0.4464
110.0 0.4423
109.0 0.4382
108.0 0.4341
107.0 0.4300
106.0 0.4259
105.0 0.4218
104.0 0.4177
103.0 0.4136
102.0 0.4096
101.0 0.4055
100.0 0.4014
99=0 0.3974
98.0 0.3933
97.0 0.3893
96.0 0.3852
95.0 0.3812
94.0 0.3771
93.0 0.3731
92.0 0.3691
91.0 0.3650
90.0 0.3610
89.0 0..3569
88.0 0.3529
87.0 0.3489
86.0 0.3449
85.0 0.3408
84.0 0.3368
83.0 0.3328
82.0 0.3287
81.0 0.3247
80.0 0.3206
79.0 0.3165
78.0 0.3125
77.0 0.3084
76.0 0.3043
75.0 0.3002
74.0 0.2960
73.0 0.2919
72.0 0.2877
71.0 0.2835
70.0 0.2794
69.0 0.2752
68.0 0.2711
67.0 0.2670
66.0 0.2628
65.0 0.2587
64.0 0.2547
63.0 0.2506
62.0 0.2466
61.0 0.2426
60.0 0.2386
59.0 0.2347
58.0 0.2309
57.0 0.2270
56.0 0.2231
55.0 0.2193
54.0 0.2154
53.0 0.2116
52.0 0.2077
51.0 0.2038
50.0 0.1999
49.0 0.1960
48.0 0.1920
47.0 0.1880
46.0 0.1840
45.0 0.1799
44.0 0.1758
43.0 0.1717
42.0 0.1676
4X.O 0.1634
40.0 0.1592
39.0 0.1551
38.0 0.1509
37.0 0.1467
36.0 0.1425
35.0 0.1383
34.0 0.1341
33.0 0.1299
32.0 0.1257
31.0 0.1216
30.0
29.0
28.0
27.0
26.0
25.0
24.0
23.0
22.0
21.0
20.0
19.0
18.0
17.0
16.0
15.0
14.0
13.0
12.0
11.0
10.0
9.0
8.0
7.0
6.0
5.0
0.1174
0.1132
0.1090
0.1048
0.1006
0.0964
0.0921
0.0879
0.0837
0.0795
0.0753
0.0711
0.0668
0.0626
0.0584
0.0541
0.0499
0.0456
0.0414
0.0371
0.0328
0.0286
0.0243
0.0201
0.0158
0,0115
A4-175
-------
J.4965 O.OOC2 STO.L/M1N.
02
13
10-05-1992
14.7 PSI
60.0 DEG.F
R-215-D i
Spher lea 1
SAPPHTRK
1 ATMO.S. & 70 'F
3.0
5.0
3.0
/.O
5.0
3.0
1.0
3.0
2.0
1.0
3.0
J.O
3.0
7.0
5.0
5.0
4.0
3.0
2.0
1.0
3.0
•3.0
3.0
7.0
6.0
5.0
4.0'
3.0
2.0
1.0
0.0
3.0
3.0
7.0
6.0
5.0
4.0
3.0
2.0
1.0
3
0.4965
0.4925
0.4886
0.4347
0.4807
0.4768
0.4728
0.4688
0.4649
0.4609
0.4569
0.4S29
0.4489
0.4449
0.4409
0.4368
0.4328
0.4287
0.4246
0.4205
0.4164
0.4123
0.4083
0.4043
0.4002
0.3962
0.3923
0.3884
0.3845
0.3806
0.3768
0.3731
0.3694
0.3658
0.3621
0.3584
0.3547
0.3510
0.3472
0.3434
•
110.0
109.0
108.0
107.0
106.0
10S.O
104.0
103.0
102 . 0
101.0
100.0
99.0
98.0
9/.0
96.0
95.0
94.0
93.0
92.0
91.0
90.0
89.0
88.0
87.0
86.0
85.0
84.0
83.0
82.0
81.0
80.0
79.0
78.0
77.0
76.0
75.0
74.0
73.0 •
72.0
71 .0
0.3393
0.3355
0.3315
0.3274
0.3232
0.3188
0.3143
0.3096
0.3049
0.3002
0.2955
0.2507
0.'2S60
0.2812
0.2764
0.2717
0.2671
0.2624
0.2579
0.2534
0.2490
0.2445
0.2401
0.2357
0.2313
0.2270
0.2227
0.2184
0.2142
0.2100
0.2058
0.2016
0.1975
0.1934
0.1893
0.1852
0.1813
0.1775
0.1738
0.1700
70.0
69.0
68.0
67.0
66.0
65:0
64.0
63.0
62.0
61.0
(50.0
59.0
58.0
57.0
56.0
55.0
54.0
53.0
52.0
51.0
50.0
49.0
48.0
47.0
46.0
45.0
44.0
43.0
42.0
41.0
40.0
39.0
38.0
37.0
36.0
35.0
34.0
33.0
32.0
31.0
0.1662
0.1625
0.1588
0.1550
0.1513
0.1476
0.1439
0.1402
0.1364
0.1327
0.1290
0.1253
0. 1217
0.1181
0.1144
0.1109
0.1073
0.1037
0.1002
0.0968
0.0933
o.oyoo
0.0866
0.0834
0.0802
0.0770
0.0741
0.0713
0.0685
0.0658
0.0631
0.06O4
0.0578
0.0553
0.0528
0.0504
0.0480
0.0457
0.0434
0.0412
30. .0
29.0
28.0-
27.0
26.0
25.0
24.0
23.0
22.0
21.0
20.0
19.0
18.0
17.0
16.0
15.0
14.0
13.0
12.0
11.0
10.0
9.0
8.0
7.0
6.0
5.0
10.0 IN
0.0013!
3.98001
0.0013
0.0201
0.0390
0.0373
0.0356
0.0339
0.0324
0.0308
0.0293
0.0278
0.0264
0.0250
0.0236
0.0223
0.0210
0.0197
0.0184
0.0172
0.0162
0.0153
0.0144
0,0135
0.0126
0.0117
0.0108
0.0099
0.0091
0.0082
A4-176
-------
•5652 0.0103 STD.CU.FT./MIN. O2
R-615-A
Spherical
316 SS
1 ATMOS. & 70'
7.
EER1
09-28-1992
14.7 PSI
60.0 DEG.F
10.0 IN.WCG
0.00139 GMS/CC
8.04000 GMS/CC
0.00133 GMS/CC
0.02014 cP
° 0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
3
3
3
D
3
D
)
)
)
)
0.5652
0.5618
0.5584
0.5550
0.5516
0.5481
0.5447
0.5412
0.5378
0.5343
0.5308
0.5272
0.5237
0.5201
0.5165
0.5129
' 0.5091
0.5054
0.5016
0.4978
0.4940
0.4901
0.4863
0.4824
0.4786
0.4747
0.4709
0.4670
0.4632
0.4593
0.4555
0.4515
0.4476
0.4436
0.4397
0.4357
0.4318
0.4279
0.4239
0.4200
110.0
109.0
108.0
107.0
106.0
105.0
104.0
103.0
102.0
101.0
100.0
99.0
98.0
97.0
96.0
95.0
94.0
93.0
92.0
91.0
90.0
89.0
88.0
87.0
86.0
85.0
84.0
83.0
82.0
81.0
80.0
79.0
78,0
77.0
76.0
75.0
74.0
73.0
72.0
71.0
0.4161
0.4122
0.4083
0.4044
0.4005
0.3966
0.3928
0.3889
0.3851
0.3813
0.3775
0.3736
0.3693
0.3660
0.3622
0.3584
0.3546
0.3508
0.3470
0.3432
0.3394
0.3356
0.3318
0.3280
0.3242
0.3204
0.3166
0.3128
0.3090
0.3052
0.3014
0.2976
0.2937
0.2899
0.2860
0.2821
0.2782
0.2743
0.2704
0.2665
70.0
69.0
68.0
67.0
66.0
65.0
64.0
63.0
62.0
61.0
60.0
59.0
58.0
57.0
56.0
55.0
54.0
53.0
52.0
51.0
50.0
49.0
48.0
47.0
46.0
45.0
44.0
43.0
42.0
41.0
40.0
39.0
38.0
37.0 .
36.0
35.0
34.0
33.0
32.0
31.0
0.2626
0.2586
0.2547
0.2508
0.2470
0.2431
0.2393
0.2354
0.2316
0.2279
0.2241
0.2204
0.2168
0.2131
0.2095
0.2058
0.2022
0.1985
0.1949
0.1912
0.1875
0.1838
0.1800
0.1763
0.1725
0.1686
0.1647
0.1608
0.1569
0.1530
0.1490
0.1451
0.1411
0.1371
0.1331
0.1292
0.1252
0 . 1212
0.1173
0.1133
30.0
29.0
28.0
27.0
26.0
25.0
24.0
23.0
22.0
21.0
20.0
19.0
18.0
17.0
16.0
15.0
14.0
13.0
12.0
11.0
10.0
9.0
8.0
7.0
6.0
5.0
0
' 0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
.1094
.1054
.1014
.0974
.0934
.0894
.0854
.0814
.0774
.0734
.0694
.0655
.0615
.0575
.0536
.0496
0457
0417
0378
0338
0299
0260
0221
0181
0142
0103
A4-177
-------
2060
"° o-
'0 Q.
"0 n.'
9C
" 0-
f 0-,
0-08
: " o-ij
o-frfc fes?-0 °;ss
0'
0"
09SO
-0
'0s
°'98 TT-.
°'^8 JT6«"0
0-88 9^6*"0
°'68 **°S'0
8°TS-o
°°ST
°'ss
0-Ss
°'6s
°'09
°-S6
f't
°0
'0
• S'-S
!"c-o .0:'"r
•o
o0:5/ frsc°^0 ;
P'80T
-------
.5756 0.0108 STD.CU.FT./MIN. H2
R-215-B
Spherical
316 S3
1 ATMOS. & 70'F
5.
EER4
: 09-28-1992
14.7 PSI,
60.0 DEG.F
10. O IN.WCG
0.00009 GMS/CC
8.04000 GMS/CC
0.00008 GMS/CC
0.00875 CP
.0
.0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
3
D
D
}
)
) •
)
)
)
1
1
0.5756
0.5732
0.5708
0*5683
0.5658
0.5633
0.5608
0.5583
0*5558
0.5532
0.5506
0.5479
0.5452
0.5424
0.5396
0.5368
0.5337
0.5307
0.5276
0.5244
0.5213
0.5182
0.5150
0.5119
0.50.87
0.5056
0.5026
0.4995
0.4965
0.4935
0.4906
0.4877
0.4848
0.4819
0.4790
0.4760
0.4731
0.4702
0.4672
0.4641
110.0
109.0
108.0
107.0
106.0
105.0
104.0
103.0
102.0
101.0
100.0
99.0
98.0
97.0
96.0
95.0
94.0
93.0
92.0
91.0
90.0
89.0
88.0
87.0
86.0
85.0
84.0
83.0
82.0
81.0
80.0
79.0
78.0
77.0
76.0
75.0
74.0
73.0
72;0
71.0
. 0.4611
0.4579
0.4547
0.4514
0.4481.
0.4446
0.4410
0.4373
0.4336
0.4298
0.4260
0.4222
0.4184
0.4146
0.4-108
0.4070
0.4033
0.3996
0.3959
0.3923
0.3888
0.3852
0.3817
0.3782
0.3746
0.3711
0.3676
0.3641
0.3606
0.3571
0.3536
0.3500
0.3465
0.3429
0.3392
0.3355
0.3319
0.3282
0.3244
0.3207
70.0
69.0
68.0
67.0
66.0
65.0
64.0
63.0
62.0
61.0
60.0
59.0
58.0
57.0
56.0
55.0
54.0
53.0
52.0
51.0
50.0
49.0
48.0
47.0
46.0
45.0
44.0
43.0
42.0
41.0
40.0
39.0
38.0
37.0
36.0
35.0
34.0
33.0
32.0
31.0
0.3169
0.3131
0.3093
0.3055
0.3016
0.2977
0.2937
0.2897
0.2857
0.2817
0.2776
0.2733
0.2689
0.2646
0.2602
0.2557
0.2513
0.2468
0.2423
0.2378
0.2333
0.2287
0.2241
0.2196
0.2150
0.2104
0.2056
0.2007
0.1959
0.1911
0.1862
0.1813
0.1765
0.1716
0.1667
0.1619
0.1570
0.1521
0.1473
0.1425
30
29
28
27
26
25
24
23
22
21.
20,
19,
18.
17.
16.
15.
14.
13.
12.
11.
10.
9.
8.
7.
6.
5.
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
,0
.0
.0
,0
,0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0:
0,
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
.1376
.1328
.1279
.1230
.1181
.1132
. 1083
.1034
.0985
.0935
.0886
.0836
,0786
.0735
.0684
0633
0581
0529
0477
0424
0372
0319
0266
0214
0161
0108
A4-179
-------
EER2
0.5206 . 0.0194, STD.CU.FT./MIN. C3HS
R-615-A
Spherical
316 SS
1 ATMOS. & 70'F
7.
09-28-1992
14.7 PSI
60.0 DEG.F
10.0 IN.WCG
0.00194 GMS/CC
8.04000 GMS/CC
0.00187 GMS/CC
0.00794 CP
0.0
9.0
3.0
7.0
5.0
5.0'
l.O
3.0
2.0
L.O
3.0
3.0
3.0
>.o
5.0
5.0
l.O
1.0
1.0
..0
J.O
i.O
:.o
'.0
l.O
:.o
.0
.0
. 0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
. 0
.0
.0
. 0
.0
.0
0.5206
0.5176
0.5145
0.5114
0.5083
0.5052
0.5021
0.4990
0.4959
0.4928
0.4897
0.4866
0.4835
0.4803
0.4772
0.4740
0.4709
0.4677
0.4645
0.4613
0.4581
0.4549
0.4517
0.4485
0.4452
0.4420
0.4388
0.4356
0.4323
0.4291
0.4259
0.4226
0.4193
0.4160
0.4128
0.4095
0.4062
0.4028
0.3995
0.3962
110.0
109.0
108.0
107.0
106.0
105.0
104.0
103.0
102.0
101.0
100.0
99.0
98.0
97.0
96.0
95.0
94.0
93.0
92.0
91.0
90.0
89.0
88.0
87.0
86.0
85.0
84.0
83.0
82.0
81.0
80.0
79.0
78.0
77.0
76.0
75.0
74.0
73.0
72.0
71.0
0.3928
0.3894
0.3860
0.3826
0.3792
0.3757
0.3721
0.3686
0.3650
0.3614
0.3578
0.3542
0.3506
0.3470
0.3434
0.3398
0.3362 .
0,3327
0.3291
0.3256
0.3221
0.3185
0.3150
0.3115
0.3080
0.3045
0.3010
0.2975
0.2940
0.2905
0.2870
0.2835
0.2800
0.2765
0.2730
0.2694
0.2659
0.2624
0.2589
0.2554
70.0
69.6
68.0
67.0
66.6
65.0
64.0
63.0
32.0
61.0
60.0
59.0
58.0
57.0
56.0
55.0
54.0
53.0
52.0
51.0
50.0
49.0
48.0
47.0
46.0
45.0
44.0
43.0
42.0
41.0
40.0
39.0
38.0
37.0
36.0
35.0
34.0
33.0
32.0
31.0
0.2519
0.2484
0.2450
0.2415
0.2380
0.2346
0.2312
0.2278
0.2244
0.2211
0.2177
0.2145
0.2113
0.2080
0.2048
0.2016
0.1984
0.1952
0.1920
0.1888
0.1855
0.1823
0.1790
0.1757
0.1724
0.1691
0.1657
0.1623
0.159O
0.1556 •
0.1522
0.1487
0.1453
0. 1419
0.1385
0.1350
0. 1316
0.1282
0.1247
0.1213
30.0
29.0
28.0
27.0
26.0
25.0
24.0
23.0
22.0
21.0
20.0
19.0
18.0
17.0
16.0
15.0
14.0
13.0
12.0
11.0
10.0
9.0
8.0
7.0
6.0
5.0
0.1179
0.1144
0.1109
0.1074
0.1039
0.1004
0.0968
0.0932
0.0896
0.0859
0.0822
0.0785
0.0746
0.0707
0.0668
0.0628.
0.0585
0.0543
0.0499
0.0456
0.0412
0.0369
0.0325
0.0281
0.0238
0.0194
A4-180
-------
EER6
4374 0.0138 STD.L/MIN.
R-215-D
Spherical
GLASS
1 ATMOS. & 70'
3.
C3HS
.09-28-1992
14.7 PSI,
60.0 DEG.F
10.0 IH.WCG
0.00194 GMS/CC
2.54000 GMS/CC
0.00187 GMS/CC
0.00794 CP „
0
o.
0
0
0
0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
. 0
. 0
.0
. 0
.0
. 0
. 0
,0
0
0
0
0
,0
.0
0
.0
.0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.4374
0,4344
0.4314
0.4284
0.4254
0..4224
0.4194
0.4163
0.4133
0.4103
0.4072
0.4041
0.4011
0.3980
0.3949
0.3918
0.3836
0,3855
0.3823
0.3792
0.3760
0.3729
0.3697
0.3666
0.3635
0.3604
0.3574
0,3543
0.3513
0.3484
0.3454
0.3426
0.3398
0.3370
0.3341
0.3313
0.3285
0.3256
0.3227
0.3198
110. 0
109.0
108.0
107.0
106.0
105.0
104 . 0
103.0
102.0
101.0
100.0
99.0
98.0
97.0
96.0
95.0
94.0
93.0
92.0
91.0
90.0
89.0
88.0
87.0
86.0
85.0
84.0
83.0
82.0
81.0
30.0
79.0
78.0
77.0
76.0
75.0
74.0
73.0
72.0
71.0
0.3168
0.3138
0.3107
0..3075
0.3042
0.3009
0,2973
0.2937
0,2901
0.2864
0.2828
0.2791
0.2754
0.2717
0.2681
0.2645
0.2609
0.2574
0.2539
0.2505
0.2472
0.2438
0.2405
0.2373
0.2341
0.2309
0.2277
0.2245
0.2213
0.2182
0.2150
0.2119
0.2087
0.2055
0.2023
0.1991
0.1960
0.1929
0.1893
0.1867
70.0
69.0
68.0
67.0
66.0
65.0
64.0
63.0
62.0
61.0
60.0
59.0
58.0
57.0
56.0
55.0
54.0
53.0
52.0
51.0
50.0
49.0
43.0
47.0
46.0
45.0
44.0
43.0
42.0
41.0
40.0
39.0
38.0
37.0
36.0
35.0
34.0
33.0
32.0
31.0
0.1836
0.1805
0.1773
0.1741
0.1710
0.1677
0.1645
0.1612
0.1580
0.1546
0.1513
0.1478
0.1443
0.1408
0.1373
0.1338
0.1302
0.1268
0.1233
0.1198
0.1164
0.1130
0.1097
0.1064
0.1032
0.1000
0.0970
0. 0939
0.0910
0.0880
0.0851
0.0823
0.0794
0.0766
0.0739
0.0712
0, 0685
0.0658
0.0632
0.0607
30.0
29.0
28.0
27.0
26.0
25.0
24.0
23.0
22.0
21.0
20.0
19.0
18.0
17,0
16.0
15.0
14.0
13.0
12.0
11.0
10.0
9.0
8.0
7.0
6.0
5.0
0.0581
0.0559
0. 0537
0.0516
0. 0495
0.0474
0. 0454
0. 0434
0. 0414
0. 0395
0.0375
0. 0357
0. 0338
0. 0320
0.0302
0. 0284
0.0269
0.0254
0.0239
0.0225
0.0210
0. 0196
0.0182
0.0167
0.0153
0.0138
A4-181
-------
EQUIPMENT CALIBRATIONS - MISCELLANEOUS
A4-182
-------
ISOTRAIN: VOST #1
DATE.- SEPTEMBER 23, 1992
GAS METER READING
START STOP NET
GASOMETER
READING VOLUME
Y.AVG •
1.007
-------
------- |