vvEPA
United States Office of Solid Waste and Office of Research and EPA/540/R-97/508
Environmental Protection Emergency Reaponse Development September 1997
Agency Washington DC 2O460 Washington DC 20460
The Superfund Innovative
Technology Evaluation
Program
Annual Report to Congress
FY 1996
SUPERFUND INNOVATIVE
TECHNOLOGY EVALUATION
-------
-------
EPA/540/R-97/508
September 1997
The Superfund Innovative Technology
Evaluation Program
Annual Report to Congress
FY1996
Office of Research and Development
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Washington, DC 20460
Printed on Recycled Paper
-------
Notice
This document has been reviewed in accordance with the U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency policy and approved for publication. Mention of trade names or commercial products
does not constitute endorsement or recommendations for use.
-------
Foreword
The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency is charged by Congress with protecting the
Nation's land, air, and water resources. Under a mandate of national enyironmental laws, the
Agency strives to formulate and implement actions leading to a compatible balance between
human activities and the ability of the natural systems to support and nurture life. To meet
these mandates, EPA's research program is providing data and technical support for solving
environmental problems today and building a science knowledge base necessary to manage
our ecological resources wisely, understand how pollutants affect our health, and prevent or
reduce environmental risks in the future.
The National Risk Management Research Laboratory is the Agency's center for investi-
gating technological and management approaches for reducing risks from threats to human
health and the environment. The focus of the Laboratory's research program is on methods for
preventing and controlling pollution to air, land, water, and subsurface resources; protecting
water quality in public water systems; remediating contaminated sites and ground water; and
preventing and controlling indoor air pollution. The goal of this research effort is to catalyze
development and implementation of innovative, cost-effective environmental technologies; de-
velop scientific and engineering information needed by EPA to support regulatory and policy
decisions; and provide technical support and information transfer to ensure effective imple-
mentation of environmental regulations and strategies.
This publication has been produced as part of the Laboratory's strategic long-term re-
search plan. It is published and made available by EPA's Office of Research and Development
to assist the user community and to link researchers with their clients.
E. Timothy Oppelt, Director
National Risk Management Research Laboratory
-------
-------
Contents
Foreword iii
Figures . vi
Tables "^
Executive Summary vii
SITE Program Overview 1
Introduction 1
Background \
Program Description . i
Program Design . 2
SITE Program Accomplishments and Highlights 5
SITE Impact 5
SITE Program Cost Savings 5
Agency Science Advisory Board Review 7
Demonstration Program Vendor Highlights 8
SITE Demonstration Program Case Studies... 8
Case Study 1: X*TRAX Thermal Desorption Technology 8
Case Study 2: Solvent Extraction Technology 9
Case Study 3: Center Pivot Spray Irrigation System 10
FY96 Progress and Accomplishments 12
Demonstration Program 12
Emerging Technology Program 12
Consortium for Site Characterization Technologies 13
Future Direction 17
Next Generation SITE Program 17
Technology Areas of Primary Interest 18
Appendices
A - All SITE Projects (Alphabetically by State) 21
B - Publications - Information Transfer Product Descriptions 39
C - Electronic Technical Information Resources .. 45
-------
Figures
Number Paงe
1 Innovative vs. established treatment technologies by year '. 6
2 Jobs reportedly awarded to developers following their
SITE demonstration 8
3 Environmental emphasis areas through fiscal year 2002 18
Number
1
2
3
Tables
Page
SITE Demonstration Projects Completed in FY 1996 13
SITE Demonstration Ongoing Projects 14
SITE Emerging Technology Projects Completed in FY 1996 15
VI
-------
Executive Summary
The Superfund Innovative Technology Evaluation (SITE) Program has been successfully
promoting the development, commercialization and implementation of innovative hazardous
waste treatment technologies for more than 10 years. SITE offers a mechanism for conducting
joint technology demonstration and evaluation projects at hazardous waste sites involving the
private sector, EPA, and other federal and state agencies. The program provides environmental
decision-makers relevant data on new, viable remediation technologies that may have
performance or cost advantages compared to conventional treatment technologies.
Today, SITE is recognized as one of EPA's principal programs to advance innovative site
monitoring, characterization, and cleanup technologies, with the potential to treat hazardous
waste more efficiently, less expensively, and more safely than many existing methods. The
SITE Program has successfully demonstrated 86 technologies, 4 of which were completed
during FY96. One hundred and fourteen technology developers are currently participating in
the demonstration program. A total of 77 technologies development projects were initiated
under the Emerging Technology Program and 31 monitoring and characterization projects under
the Consortium for Site Characterization Technologies Program.
The SITE Program has been estimating program cost savings since 1993. During 1996,
the SITE Program collected information from signed Records of Decision (RODs dated 1993-
1995) in all 10 Regions that selected an innovative technology as the selected remedy. This
time period was selected for evaluation because more innovative technologies than conventional
technologies were selected in RODs signed during this time period. Of 96 RODs selecting
innovative technologies, 46 used technology types tested in the SITE Program and had enough
cost information to allow a comparison of the innovative and standard treatment technology.
The total cost savings for the 46 RODs was 1.4 billion dollars. Six of the 46 RODs included in
this estimate reported that the use of innovative technologies was more expensive than the
established technology or treatment. The average percent savings per site was 70%.
Using the 1986 SITE Program initiation date, total discounted costing savings for the
SITE Program is 780 million dollars and the total SITE Program budget is 100 million dollars.
The SITE Program is only one part of the cost associated with developing and commercializing
innovative technologies.
During FY96, a Subcommittee of the Environmental Engineering Committee (ECC) of
EPA's Science Advisory Board (SAB) conducted a formal review of the SITE Program. The
preliminary review was favorable. In general the committee found that the accomplishments of
the SITE Program had been met or exceeded. The SAB recommended that "the Agency should
build upon the success of SITE either by continuing the existing program with some
improvements or by creating a new technology evaluation program built upon the precepts of
the current program."
vn
-------
In an effort to reduce expenditures, the SITE program has reviewed its approach to
advancing innovative technologies. Building on existing strengths, the program will shift from
a technology-driven focus to a remediation-problem driven focus driven by the needs of the
hazardous waste remediation community. With this change in focus, the SITE Program can be
defined in four operating principles, including (1) program planning; (2) matching priority
sites with innovative technology solutions; (3) conducting technology field demonstrations;
and (4) information dissemination. To ensure the highest possible quality, overall program
direction and strategies will be evaluated each year based on input from the user community
and other private and public sector stakeholders. Priority areas of highest interest during FY97
include topics such as groundwater contaminated with organics and inorganics, metals in soils
and chlorinated organics. These areas will be reassessed during FY97 as part of the overall
program planning.
The objective of the SITE Program is to conduct field demonstrations and high technical
quality performance verifications of viable remediation technologies. The resulting data and
reports are intended for use by the site owners and state and federal decision-makers in selecting
remediation options and for adding credibility to technology vendors. Technology
demonstrations are increasingly being conducted in partnership with other EPA offices, other
federal agencies, states, private industry, and universities. SITE reports and dissemination of
program information have been and continue to be a valuable resource to the technology user
community.
Vlll
-------
SITE Program Overview
Introduction
The Superfund Innovative Technology
Evaluation (SITE) Program of the United States
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has been
successfully promoting the development, commer-
cialization, and implementation of innovative haz-
ardous waste site remediation technologies for
more than ten years. SITE offers a mechanism for
conducting joint technology demonstration and
evaluation projects at hazardous waste sites in-
volving the private sector, EPA, and other federal
and state agencies. The program provides envi-
ronmental decision-makers relevant data on new,
viable remediation technologies that may have per-
formance or cost advantages compared to conven-
tional treatment technologies.
Background
The discovery of uncontrolled hazardous
waste sites in the late seventies, such as New
York's Love.Canal, New Jersey's Chemical Con-
trol site, and Kentucky's Valley of the Drums, fo-
cused national attention on an increasingly seri-
ous problem. Inadequate or faulty disposal prac-
tices and the mishandling of toxic wastes over
several decades had resulted in thousands of sites
across the United States that potentially threatened
human health and the environment. The magni-
tude of the problem moved Congress in 1980 to
enact the Comprehensive Environmental Re-
sponse, Compensation, and Liability Act (CER-
CLAcommonly known as Superfund) to deal
with the dangers posed by the nation's worst aban-
doned and uncontrolled hazardous waste sites.
As cleanup activities began at hazardous
waste sites under CERCLA, treatment technolo-
gies then available were often found to be inad-
equate for the highly complex problems they were
expected to solve. Consequently, the demand for
treatment often outstripped the availability and
capability of existing technologies. Concern was
growing among the scientific community, citizens,
and government officials over the sometimes lim-
ited effectiveness and high cost of conventional
methods for treating hazardous wastes at Super-
fund sites. Such technologies typically involved
containment of the waste on-site or transport to
an off-site incinerator or landfill. While the origi-
nal Superfund legislation contained no research
and development provisions, it became clear that
additional technologies that work better, faster, and
less expensive were needed.
The 1986 Superfund Amendments and Re-
authorization Act (SARA) addressed this need.
Besides reauthorizing Superfund, SARA directed
EPA to develop a formal research, development,
and demonstration program to promote innova-
tive hazardous waste cleanup technologies as al-
ternatives to containment and incineration. In re-
sponse, EPA's Office of Research and Develop-
ment (ORD) and Office of Solid Waste and Emer-
gency Response (OSWER) jointly developed the
Superfund Innovative Technology Evaluation Pro-
gram. The SITE Program was created to meet the
increased demand for alternative hazardous waste
treatment technologies and was the first major pro-
gram for demonstrating and evaluating full-scale,
innovative treatment technologies at hazardous
waste sites. The program is administered by ORD
through its National Risk Management Research
Laboratory (NRMRL), in partnership with the
National Exposure Research Laboratory (NERL).
Program Description
SITE is a partnership between the public and
private sectors, where the costs and responsibili-
1
-------
ties are shared by EPA, hazardous waste site own-
ers, and technology developers. Under the pro-
gram, EPA enters into cooperative-type arrange-
ments with site owners and technology develop-
ers, under which innovative technologies are dem-
onstrated at selected hazardous waste sites. EPA
evaluates the new technologies, based on the dem-
onstration results, and compiles and publishes en-
gineering, performance, and cost data intended to
aid in decisions regarding the use of the technolo-
gies at similar hazardous waste sites. The program.
generates credible and unbiased technology cost
and performance data needed by remedial project
managers, consultants, and other environmental
decision makers.
Historically, one of the greatest factors in-
hibiting the use of innovative cleanup technolo-
gies has been the unavailability of adequate and
credible cost and performance data during tech-
nology development at or near the commercial
scale. Understandably, many problem-owners are
unwilling to risk the use of innovative technolo-
gies without assurance of the technology's suc-
cess. By addressing this need, SITE has been suc-
cessful in aiding the first-time field use of many
technologies. Providing credible, unbiased cost
and performance data remains the strong founda-
tion of SITE. Key elements that contribute to the
SITE Program's position as an effective evaluat-
ing program include credibility, objectivity, and
technical expertise.
Program Design
The SITE Program is comprised of three
components, including the Demonstration Pro-
gram, the Consortium for Site Characterization
Technology Program, and Technology Transfer
Activities.
Demonstration Program Conduct and
evaluate demonstrations of promising innovative
technologies at selected hazardous waste sites to
provide reliable performance, cost, and applica-
bility information for site cleanup decision-mak-
ing.
Consortium for Site Characterization
Technology (CSCT) Program - Evaluate technolo-
gies that detect, monitor, and measure hazardous
and toxic substances to provide more cost-effec-
tive methods for producing real-time data during
site characterization and remediation.
Information Transfer Activities Dissemi-
nate technical information, including engineering,
performance, and cost data to assist in removing
impediments for selection and use of innovative
and alternative technologies.
SITE Demonstration Program
In the Demonstration Program, innovative
cleanup technologies are field tested on hazard-
ous waste materials. SITE Demonstrations are
conducted at hazardous waste sites, such as those
on the National Priorities List (NPL), at non-NPL
sites^or under simulated hazardous waste site con-
ditions at developer or federal test and evaluation
facilities. Engineering, performance, and cost data
are gathered on innovative technologies for review
by potential users to evaluate their applicability
to similar waste sites or to compare their effec-
tiveness and costs to other alternatives. Data col-
lected during each field demonstration are used
to assess the performance of the technology, the
potential need for pre- or post-processing of the
waste, applicable types of wastes and contami-
nated media (e.g., soil, sludge, water, sediment),
potential operating problems, limitations, and ap-
proximate capital, operating, and maintenance
costs.
The Demonstration Program, as of Septem-
ber 30,1996, included 124 accepted, ongoing, and
completed demonstrations. These technologies are
presented alphabetically in Appendix A, accord-
ing to the state in which the developer's business
is located.
Consortium for Site Characterization
Technology (CSCT) Program
In the CSCT Program, developers of inno-
vative hazardous waste measurement and moni-
toring technologies are given the opportunity to
-------
demonstrate their technologies' performance un-
der rigorous field conditions; EPA compiles the
results and prepares a report summarizing the find-
ings. The distribution of the report may enhance
market acceptance or define new applications for
the technology.
The purpose of the CSCT Program is to ac-
celerate the acceptance and use of effective inno-
vative measurement and monitoring technologies
in the field. This includes new or modified tech-
nologies that can detect, monitor, and measure
hazardous and toxic substances in the subsurface,
air, biological tissues, waste materials, and sur-
face waters; Technologies include chemical sen-
sors for in situ (in place) measurements, ground-
water sampling devices, soil and core sampling
devices, soil gas sampling devices, fluid sampling
devices, laboratory and field-portable analytical
equipment, and systems that support field sam-
pling or data acquisition and analysis.
Such technologies can be used to accurately
assess the degree of contamination at a site, pro-
vide data to evaluate potential effects on human
health and the environment, supply data to help
select the most appropriate cleanup action, and
monitor the effectiveness of a selected remedia-
tion technology. The CSCT Program places high
priority on technologies that provide more cost-
effective, faster, and safer methods than conven-
tional technologies for producing real-time or
near-real-time data. As. with the Demonstration
Program, innovative technologies are demon-
strated under field conditions and results are com-
piled, evaluated, published, and disseminated by
ORD.
The primary objectives of this portion of the
SITE program are:
to test existing field analytical technolo-
gies that enhance monitoring and site char
acterization capabilities
to identify the attributes of new technolo-
gies to address field characterization and
monitoring problem in a more cost-effec-
tive and efficient manner ,
to prepare protocols, guidelines, and meth-
ods that enhance the acceptance of these technolo-
gies for routine use
Evaluations or demonstrations have now
been completed for nearly 30 projects. This pro-
gram is administered by ORD'S National Expo-
sure Research Laboratory at the Characterization
Research Division in Las Vegas, NV. Technolo-
gies demonstrated under the CSCT Program are
listed in Appendix A.
SITE Information Transfer
Information transfer activities ensure that
valuable technical information on innovative tech-
nologies from the Demonstration and CSCT Pro-
grams is disseminated through various communi-
cation mechanisms. This includes technical net-
working, publications, and electronic distribution.
The most important products are the published
technical reports on each field demonstration. All
such activities increase the awareness and promote
the use of innovative technologies for assessment
and remediation at Superfund sites. The primary
goal of information transfer is to promote com-
munication among environmental stakeholders re-
quiring up-to-date technical information.
Mechanisms for providing information on
technology demonstrations and the SITE Program
include:
Program-specific brochures and exhibits
Conferences, workshops, and technical
working groups
Publications and video tapes (Appendix B)
Electronic media, including the Internet
and electronic bulletin boards
Technical assistance to regions, states, and
remediation contractors
Technology seminars
-------
A number of technology databases summa-
rize information on innovative treatment technolo-
gies and associated vendors. These databases may
serve as tools in identifying potential technolo-
gies demonstration candidates or serve as a "yel-
low pages" for technology vendors. Examples of
these databases include, but are not limited to,
Vendor Information System for Innovative Treat-
ment Technologies (VISITT), Vendor Field Ana-
lytical and Characterization Technologies System
(Vendor FACTS), and the Bioremediation in the.
Field Search System (BFSS). This information is
accessible via Internet through the SITE
Homepage (http://www.epa.gov/ORD/SITE/) or
the Technology Innovation Office (TIO)
Homepage (http://www.clu-in.com). Descriptions
of the databases and publication ordering infor-
mation are contained in Appendix C.
-------
SITE Program Accomplishments and Highlights
SITE Impact
Today, SITE is recognized as one of EPA's
principal programs to advance innovative site
monitoring, characterization, and cleanup tech-
nologies, with the potential to treat- hazardous
wastes more efficiently, less expensively, and more
safely than many existing methods. SITE'S mis-
sion is to promote the development and applica-
tion of innovative technologies that reduce or
eliminate risks to human health and the environ-
ment due to contamination. The goal of the pro-
gram is to interact with the technology user com-
munity, understand its needs, integrate those needs
with EPA's research mission, and expeditiously
address those needs. Identifying and responding
to the technology needs of the remediation com-
munity is the driving force behind today's SITE
Program.
Over the past ten years, SITE has earned in-
creased recognition as a leader in advancing in-
novative technology development and commer-
cialization and is currently participating coopera-
tively with more than 94 hazardous waste sites
and 114 technology developers. Through fiscal
year (FY) 1996, the SITE Program has success-
fully demonstrated 86 technologies, 4 of which
were completed during FY96. This represents a
tremendous amount of new information available
on the performance, costs, and applicability of
innovative cleanup technologies.
Innovative Technology Use Has Increased
Significant increases in the types and num-
bers of innovative technologies being selected for
Superfund remedial action began after the passage
of SARA. While rarely used during the early
1980s, innovative technologies comprised ap-
proximately one-quarter of the total number of
technologies selected for Superfund projects be-
tween fiscal years (FY) 1986 arid 1987. Since then,
the number has continued to rise, indicating in-
creased credibility for a number of innovative
treatment technologies. Figure 1 shows that more
innovative technologies were selected in Records
of Decisions (RODsofficial records document-
ing selection of Superfund site cleanup methods)
signed during fiscal years 1993, 1994, and 1995
than established technologies. Although SITE is
only one contributing factor in increasing inno-
vative technology selection, the program has
played a significant role.
SITE Program Cost Savings
The SITE Program has been estimating pro-
gram cost savings since 1993.
During 1996, the SITE Pro-
gram collected information
from signed Records of Deci-
sions (RODs dated 1993-1995)
in all 10 Regions that selected
an innovative technology as the
selected remedy. This time pe-
riod was selected for evaluation
because more innovative tech-
nologies than conventional technologies were se-
lected in RODs signed in each of these years (Fig-
ure 1). A total of 96 RODs used innovative tech-
nologies. Of the 96 RODs, 46 used technology
types tested in the SITE Program and had adequate
cost information to enable a comparison of the
selected'innovative and standard treatment tech-
nology. The cost savings reflect preliminary esti-
mates and were inflated to the end of 1996 using
median Consumer Price Index (CPI) figures. The
total cost savings for the 46 RODs was 1.4 billion
dollars. Six of the 46 RODs included in this esti-
-------
I
o
CD
5
CO
1
~c
w
n
H-
"o
"e
(D
(2)
Established Technologies
Innovative Technologies
82 83 84 85 86 87
88 89 90 91
Fiscal Year
Data based on Records of Decision (RODs), except onsite incineration data, which are based on
anticipated deign and construction activities as of August 1996.
Data based on anticipated design and construction activities as of August 1996. NOTE: A site
may use more than one technology.
Figure 1. Innovative vs. established treatment technologies by year.
(Source: U.S. EPA, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response, Technology Innovation Office, Innovative
Treatment Technologies: Annual Status Report-Eighth Edition, EPA/542/R-96/010, November 1996.)
mate reported that the use of innovative technolo-
gies was more expensive than the established tech-
nology. The average percent savings per site was
70%. However, the RODs in this data set may rep-
resent particularly difficult cleanup problems as
the cost savings per ROD were found to be higher,
on average, than the cost per ROD in the
Superfund Program overall.
In order to estimate SITE Program net ben-
efit, the 1993-1995 RODs and the SITE Program
budget were first inflated to the end of 1996 using
CPI figures and then normalized to 1986 end-of-
year levels using a 7% discount rate, as specified
in OMB-Circular A-94. The 1986 date was se-
lected as the baseline since the SITE Program was
initiated in SARA 1986. The total discounted cost
savings for RODs from 1993-1995 is 780 mil-
lion dollars. For comparison, the total discounted
SITE Program budget from 1986-1996 was 100
million dollars. The SITE Program is only one
part of the cost associated with developing and
commercializing innovative technologies.
Figure 1 illustrates the number of innovative
versus established treatment technologies selected
by year. This figure shows a peak in 1993, when
more innovative technologies were selected than
conventional technologies. A peak in .the savings
associated with the use of innovative technolo-
gies is also observed in 1993.
Since more innovative technologies were
selected from 1993-1995, and more than 1.4 bil-
lion was estimated in savings, the increased use
of innovative technologies appears to correlate
with an increase in savings realized from the use
of innovative technologies.
-------
Agency Science Advisory Board Review
During FY 1996, a Subcommittee of the En-
vironmental Engineering Committee (EEC) of
EPA's Science Advisory Board (SAB) conducted
a formal review of the SITE Program, This re-
view primarily focused on the following:
The extent to which stated program objec-
tives have been met ,
Scientific and technical aspects of the pro-
gram
Impacts of the program and recommenda-
tions for potential improvements
How well the program has supported in-
novative technology commercialization
The Subcommittee's final report was ap-
proved by the EEC and the Science Advisory
Board's Executive Committee in July 1997.
The SAB Report Includes the Following Statements:
The subcommittee found the accomplishments of the SITE Program to be impressive. Stated
program objectives have been generally met or exceeded, and the program has provided credible
information on mostly innovative technologies, many of which are in use today at Superfund or
RCRA Corrective Action Sites.
The need for improved technology to prevent, reduce, or remediate environmental contamination
remains a national priority. The Subcommittee believes that in order to meet this need, the Agency
should build upon the success of SITE either by continuing the existing program with some im-
provements or by creating a new. technology evaluation program built upon the precepts of the
current program.
The SITE Program has met the-objectives set for it, has become a model for at least one other
technology evaluation program, EnTICE [now called ETVEnvironmental Technology Verifica-
tion Program], and has played a substantial role in joint technology evaluations with the Depart-
ments of Energy and Defense, ,
-------
Demonstration Program Vendor Highlights
SITE Demonstration Program Case Studies
Technology vendors are a very important part
of the program. They provide the service for the
sites needing clean-up solutions. Seventy-seven
vendors completing a SITE Program evaluation
were asked about company revenues. Roughly
50% of the responses claimed a 20%-75% increase
in revenues as a result of SITE Program involve-
ment (Figure 2). The majority of the vendors in-
dicated that their companies were awarded be-
tween 1-5 Superfund and 1-5 commercial
remediation jobs following their participation in
SITE. Thirty percent of the vendors reported 1-2
international contracts. This number has increased
from the SITE Program vendor responses in 1994.
Vendors specified 20 countries where bids were
submitted.
so
!2 40
30
20
10
0(a) 1-5 6-11 11-25
Number of jobs
>25
BHJ Superfund I I Non-Superfund
(a) some developers did not bid on jobs
Figure 2. Jobs reportedly awarded to "developers follow-
ing their SITE demonstration.
The following case studies are examples of
innovative remediation technologies that have
participated in the SITE Program and were later
selected for full-scale remediation of specific sites.
The case studies also present the estimated cost
savings resulting from the use of innovative tech-
nologies compared to the cost estimates for es-
tablished technologies also considered at the site.
,",ซ..
-------
oil, grease, total recoverable petroleum hydrocar-
bons, and tetrachloroethane were reduced to be-
low detectable limits in the treated soil.
Full-Scale Remediation
Based on the success of the SITE demon-
stration, the technology was.selected for full-scale
use in remediation of the Re-solve, Inc..site. The
full-scale X*TRAX system, Model 200, was used
to remediate 50,000 tons of PCB-contaminated
soil at the site.
Cost Comparison
A cost comparison between excavation and
incineration and excavation and on-site thermal
desorption (using X*TRAX) was presented in the
ROD. According to the ROD, the estimated cost
to remediate the site using the incineration alter-
native is $31,347,000. The estimated cost using
the innovative desorption (X*TRAX) technology
is $17,038,000. Selection of the innovative
X*TRAX technology resulted in a savings of
$14,309,000 or approximately 46%.
Solvent jfxtract ion
Terra-Kleen Response Group, Inc. (Terra-
Kleen) has developed a solvent extraction system
that removes PCBs and other organic compounds
from waste material. This process applies an or-
ganic chemical solvent to the waste material to
extract contaminants. Like water-based soil wash-
ing, solvent extraction does not typically destroy
wastes but is a means of separating hazardous con-
taminants from soils, sludges, and sediments. Sol-
vent extraction operates on the principle that, with
the appropriate solvent, organic contaminants can
be preferentially solubilized and removed from the
waste.
A technology demonstration was conducted
at Naval Air Station North Island (NASNI) in Cali-
fornia. The primary objective of the SITE dem-
onstration was to determine whether the Terra-
Kleen technology could reduce PCBs to below the
Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) incinera-
tion equivalency level (2 milligrams per kilogram
[mg/kg]). Analyses of untreated versus treated soil
at the NASNI demonstration site indicated that
the Terra-Kleen technology reduced PCB concen-
trations from an average of 144 mg/kg to less than
1.71 mg/kg, representing a removal efficiency of
98.8%.
Removing contaminants from the solvent fol-
lowing treatment permits the reuse of the solvent.
Regenerated solvent from the SITE demonstra-
tion was analyzed to determine if it was accept-
able for reuse. PCB extracted from the solvent was
removed in proprietary media and incinerated fol-
lowing the demonstration. Analytical results in-
dicated that the PCB concentration in the solvent
was below the laboratory method detection limit
of 0.08 mg/kg. Since the PCB concentration was
less than the TSCA incineration equivalency level
for PCBs, the solvent was deemed acceptable for
reuse at other contaminated sites. Reuse of the
solvent material reduces the cost of using the sys-
tem.
Full-Scale Remediation
Terra-Kleen was later asked to conduct a full-
scale remediation of three pesticide-contaminated
sites at Naval Communication Station (NCS)
Stockton. Conducted under the Comprehensive
Long-Term Environmental Action Navy
(CLEAN) Program, Terra-Kleen remediated soils
at NCS Stockton sites that were contaminated with
pesticides. The goal of the remediation was to re-
duce the concentrations of each pesticide to be-
low 1 mg/kg. This concentration was based on the
threshold limit concentration for these compounds
and was below the EPA Region 9 preliminary re-
mediation goal for DDT in residential soil.
The successful treatment of the NCS Stock-
ton soils has led the Navy to consider the Terra-
Kleen technology for treatment of other sites at
NCS Stockton and at other naval facilities.
-------
Cost Comparison
Cost comparison data generated for the fea-
sibility study (FS) for the Stockton site compared
the Terra-Kleen technology to off-site incinera-
tion, a second alternative under consideration for
use at the site. According to the FS data, the total
estimated cost for off-site incineration was
$10,051,700. The total estimated cost to use the
Terra-Kleen technology was estimated to be
$4,324,000. Using this cost comparison data,
which was also presented in the Record Of Deci-
sion (ROD), selection of the innovative Terra-
Kleen technology alternative resulted in a savings
of $5,727,700, or 57%, in comparison to off-site
incineration.
"I I i1 would not lie in business it'it \ \ wen't for the SITE
/Vo#ninj."
Alan Cash
Terra Kleen Response Group, Inc
|Case Study 3: Center Pivot Spray
*ซ ? - -h ' '' <'~;*<; ;';; Irrigation System " _;
;.-;'.; /,':",.; -,}.'(University' of NeBraska-' "\
^ '. *;,:,- , lf --....', :, ,:,,^Jk|-. ,!?->^.i*-.>e''' *..'*' ' --"ป**& f&;v?r,'~<: f-,'-;;-:::>.; rf-,::*&&
v:,:_ -'-- Lincoln) .... ; ,...;";'_;
Research conducted by the University of Ne-
braska and the U.S. Department of Agriculture
indicated that a traditional Center Pivot Spray Ir-
rigation System could be modified for use as an
air stripping unit to remediate volatile organic
compounds (VOCs). The premise behind the tech-
nology involved the potential to address the need
for irrigation water through the use of contami-
nated groundwater that could be converted for use
on crops. The key to the successful use of such a
system involves controlling the droplet size exit-
ing the irrigation unit to allow evaporation of up
to 500 parts per million (ppm) VOC. The residual
contaminants are transferred to the atmosphere,
where they are dispersed and rapidly degraded in
ultraviolet light.
As part of the Western Governors Associa-
tion initiative for innovative technologies, several
state environmental agencies, representatives of
the Navy Facility Engineering Centers, U.S. Army
Corps of Engineers, and other stakeholders par-
ticipated in the review of the technology demon-
stration. The purpose of the demonstration was
the identification of appropriate applications of the
Center Pivot Spray Irrigation technology alterna-
tive for use by state programs and federal facili-
ties.
The technology was demonstrated in con-
junction with the SITE Program at the North Land-
fill Subsite in Hastings, Nebraska. The system used
in the SITE demonstration was a center pivot unit
located in a 50-acre, furrow-irrigated corn field
underlain by commingled plumes of VOC con-
taminated groundwater. The primary goal of the
demonstration was to determine the efficiency of
the system in the remediation of VOCs in ground-
water to concentrations below the maximum con-
taminant levels (MCLs).
The demonstration included a great deal of
community involvement and was considered a
success based on the final results.
Full-Scale Remediation
The successful SITE demonstration led the
management of the Lindsay Manufacturing (Lind-
say) Superfund Site in Nebraska to apply to EPA
Region 7 for approval to add the technology to an
existing groundwater pump-and-treat system. The
technology also is being considered for use at sev-
eral grain elevator sites being investigated and
remediated by Argonne National Laboratory.
Cost Comparison
Lindsay provided limited cost comparison
information with the request for approval. Accord-
ing to Lindsay, the average operation and mainte-
nance (O&M) costs associated with operating the
existing groundwater extraction and treatment
system and the soil vapor extraction (SVE) sys-
tem was $16,500 per month, plus utilities. Lind-
say estimated that the proposed use of the Center
Pivot Irrigation System during dryer months
would result in an average monthly O&M expen-
diture of $6,000 per month. Lindsay's estimate in-
10
-------
dicates that operation of the Center Pivot Irriga-
tion System will result in a savings of $100,000
to $125,000 per year, or an approximate savings
on O&M costs of 37%. EPA Region 7 approved
addition of the technology to the existing treat-.
merit efforts in November 1996. Irrigation using
the system is scheduled to begin in the spring of
1997.
11
-------
FY96 Progress and Accomplishments
Demonstration Program
During FY96, four new innovative technolo-
gies were evaluated in the field. Due to an un-
usual budgetary year, the annual SITE Program
solicitation was not announced. Only ongoing field
projects initiated prior to FY96 were completed.
Completed projects are listed in Table 1.
Over the past ten years an emphasis was
placed on innovative technologies for permanent
treatment. The majority of the field demonstra-
tions were with ex situ physical/chemical and ther-
mal technology types. Many projects were field
tested in a matter of days or weeks. As we move
toward more non-invasive in situ techniques with
the potential for lower cost application, field dem-
onstration and verification may take several
months to years of data collection. There contin-
ues to be a need for innovative ex situ technolo-
gies that provide a more cost-effective approach
or where quicker treatment is required to protect
human health and the environment from immedi-
ate risk.
In general, the need for credible and reliable
data on innovative treatment technologies pro-
vided by SITE remains significant. Eighty RODs,
signed during 1994 that selected established tech-
nologies as the best alternative, were reviewed.
Of the 80 RODs, 16 (20%) considered an innova-
tive technology as an alternative for remediation
of the site. The majority of the RODs stated that
the innovation options were not chosen due to a
lack of verified performance, effectiveness, and
implementability associated with the innovative
technologies. Six of the RODs cited cost as an
issue and two cited state and community concerns
about the innovative technology.
Based on the increased emphasis in in situ
technologies, the list of ongoing demonstrations
will increase with fewer moving from the ongo-
ing to completed status annually than in the past.
It is still estimated that six field demonstrations
will be completed each year. A list of ongoing
projects is provided in Table 2.
Emerging Technology Program
The Emerging Technology Program (ETP)
fosters the research and development of innova-
tive technologies for remediation of Superfund and
other hazardous waste sites. Technologies enter
the program at the bench- or pilot-scale stage of
development. EPA provides developers the oppor-
tunity to move a technology forward through
bench- and pilot-scale testing to demonstration.
The SITE ETP was discontinued in 1996 due
to reductions in funding to the Superfund research
and development budget. The program continues
to honor commitments to technology developers
currently in the program but new technologies
were not admitted into the program after 1995.
Technologies were solicited yearly for the
ETP through requests for preproposals. Selected
candidates were invited to submit a Cooperative
Agreement application that underwent full tech-
nical review. Applications were considered for a
Cooperative Agreement with a duration of up to
two years, and funding of $150,000 per year with
a $300,000 maximum. Second year funding de-
pended on significant progress during the first
year. Upon completion of the ETP, technologies
were considered for the SITE Demonstration Pro-
gram. Many technology vendors chose to fully
commercialize their technology after participat-
ing in the ETP.
12
-------
Table 1 . SITE Demonstration Projects Completed in FY 1 996
Company Site
Location Developer Technology Location
ID
NE
NJ
Canada
Morrison Knudsen
Corporation/STG
University of
Nebraska
Accutech, Inc.
EnviroMetal
Technologies,
Inc.
This technology uses clay slurries as a base for grout
solutions, which are injected into bedrock fracture systems
to inhibit or eliminate groundwater flow in these pathways.
The technology was tested at the Mike Horse Mine site.
The Center Pivot spray irrigation system is used to
remediate groundwater contaminated with volatile organics.
A thin film of water produced by impact pads breaks up
into small droplets as it leaves the pads. This technique
may be limited to low VOC groundwater concentrations.
The demonstration was conducted at the Hastings,
Nebraska Superfund site.
The Accutech, pneumatic fracturing and catalytic
oxidation process, forces gases into geologic formations at
pressures that exceed the natural in situ stresses,
creating a fracture network. These fractures allow
subsurface air to circulate faster and more efficiently
throughout the formation. The catalytic oxidation unit is
equipped with a special catalyst to destroy
halogenated organics. The demonstration was conducted
at the Highland Park site in New Jersey.
This technology degrades dissolved halogenated organic
compounds in groundwater with an in situ permeable wall
containing reactive metal such as iron. The demonstration
was conducted at an industrial facility in New York.
Mike
Horse
Mines, MT
Hastings,
NE
Highland,
Park.NJ
Chenango
County
New York
Nine solicitations were issued from Novem-
ber 1987 (E01 Solicitation) to July 1995 (E09
Solicitation). A total of 77 technology develop-
ment projects were initiated under the ETP. Fifty-
nine ETP projects have been completed. Eighteen
of the ETP projects are in the SITE Demonstra-
tion Program. To date, six of the demonstration
projects have been completed and twelve are on-
going. The completed emerging technology
projects for FY96 are listed in Table 3.
Consortium for Site Characterization
Technologies
During FY96, the Characterization and
Monitoring program made improvements to the
guidance manual for preparing Demonstration
plans. The primary intent of these revisions was
to clarify the selection criteria for the reference
laboratory and field test sites. This document also
underwent an external peer review and received
many favorable comments. The guidance manual
is now in routine use and has streamlined the plan-
ning process. The document has been used as a
model in a number of states, most notably Cali-
fornia, as a basis for the state certification pro-
gram.
The Characterization and Monitoring pro-
gram has leveraged its resources with EPA's En-
vironmental Technology Verification Program.
These programs now known collectively as the
Consortium for Site Characterization Technolo-
gies (CSCT) have developed a partnership agree-
ment with the Department of Energy (DOE). A
formal Memorandum of Understanding has been
developed to identify the topics and procedures
of mutual interest. This agreement will allow the
13
-------
Table 2. SITE Demonstration Ongoing Projects
Proposed
Company Site
Location Developer Technology Location
CO
MO
NJ
NM
OH
OH
OH
UT
Pintail Systems
Monsanto
Phytotech, Inc.
Sandia National
Laboratory
Commodore
Environmental
Services, Inc.
U.S. EPA/
NRMRL
U.S. DOD/
Air Force
Phytokinetics,
Inc.
This technology uses microbial detoxification of cyanide in
heap leach processes to reduce cyanide levels in spent ore
and process solutions. The biotreatment populations of
natural soil bacteria are grown to elevated concentrations,
which are applied to spent ore by drip or spray irrigation.
The Lasagna process combines electroosmosis with
treatment layers which are installed directly into the
contaminated soil to form an integrated, in situ remedial
process. The process is designed to treat soils and
groundwater contaminated with VOCs. The technology
demonstration is located at the U.S. DOE Paducah
Gaseous Diffusion Plant.
The Phytoremediation technology uses specially selected
and engineered plants to treat soil and water contaminated
with toxic metals such as lead and cadmium, as well as
radionuclides. The demonstration is currently being
conducted.
The Sandia National Laboratory electrokinetic extraction
system is for treating metal contaminated soils. This
technology was developed for use in unsaturated soils
without adding significant amounts of water. The
technology is currently operating at an unlined chromic
acid pit within a Sandia National Laboratory landfill.
The solvated electron remediation system chemically
transforms toxic contaminants such as PCBs, pesticides
and other halogenated compounds into relatively benign
substances. This project is part of the White House Rapid
Commercialization Initiative (RCI). The demonstration is
for treating PCB contaminated soils from the Construction
Battalion Supply Center in Port Hueneme, DOD facility.
The bioventing biological system treats contaminated soil
in situ by injecting atmospheric air. The air provides a
continuous oxygen source, which enhances the growth
of microorganisms naturally present in the soil. The
demonstration is being conducted at the Reilly Tar site
on polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbon (PAH)
contaminated soils.
The Air Force is field testing the effectiveness of eastern
cottonwood trees in remediating shallow groundwater
contaminated with TCE. The cottonwood trees are
expected to bioremediate the contaminated groundwater
and soils. This project is in conjunction with the DOD
Environmental Security Technology Certification Program
(ESTCP) at the Air Force Plant 4 at the Naval Air Station.
This demonstration will assess the ability of plants to reduce
the concentrations of petroleum hydrocarbons in near-surface
soils, saturated zone and to modify the groundwater gradient.
Alfalfa and fescue plantings will be evaluated for soil
remediation, while poplar and juniper trees will be investigated
for their ability to treat the saturated groundwater zone.
Demonstration currently underway at a former Chevron
transfer station.
Battle
Mountain,
NV
Paducah,
KY
Trenton, NJ
Albuquerque
NM
Port
Hueneme,
CA
St. Louis,
MN
Fort Worth,
TX
Ogden, UT
14
-------
Table 3. SITE Emerging Technology Projects Completed in FY1 996
Treatment
State Developer " Technology Description Category
CA
CA
AZ
FL
Environmental
Biotechnologies,
Inc.
COGNIS, Inc.
Arizona State
University
High Voltage
Environmental
Applications,
Inc.
This technology is designed to treat soil
and sediments contaminated with coal tar and wastes
from former Manufactured Gas Plant sites. The
technology uses a fungal augmented system designed
to enhance natural bioprocesses.
This soil remediation system leaches and recovers lead
and other metals from contaminated soil, dust, sludge,
or sediment. The system uses a patented aqueous
leachant that is optimized through treatability tests for
the media and contaminant.
The photocatalytic oxidation process removes VOCs
from air s.treams. The technology utilizes air stripping for
removal of VOCs from groundwater and soil, followed
by PCO treatment. This system has been field tested.
This high-energy electron beam irradiation technology is
a low-temperature method for destroying complex
mixtures of hazardous organic chemicals in
contaminated media. The technology is available for
full:scale remediations.
Biological .
Chemical
Chemical
Physical
CSCT portion of the SITE Program to supplement
its funding of characterization and monitoring
demonstrations and will also include the exper-
tise of DOE's national laboratories to assist in the
demonstration process. It is anticipated that EPA
funding for the SITE program will continue to be
required but, that this alliance will help address
the demand for this program and eliminate the
backlog of technologies that have submitted ap-
plications.
A stakeholder group was formulated to as-
sist in outreach activities and in the process of tech-
nology selection. An advocates program, involv-
ing the EPA regional offices, was also established
to assist in the demonstration process and to en-
sure that the products of the demonstration ad-
dress agency issues.
As a result of decreased funding, no new
demonstrations were conducted during FY96.
Activities were confined to preparing reports on
the FY95 field demonstration involving the test
of seven field Portable X-Ray fluorescence (FP-
XRF) systems. This technology can be used to pro-
vide rapid, real-time analysis of toxic metals in
the soil. The commercial systems evaluated dur-
ing this demonstration were:
MAP Spectrum Analyzer for Scietec
Corporation
XL Spectrum Analyzer from Nitron
Corporation
TN 9000 and
TN Lead Analyzer from TN Spectrace
SEFA-P Analyzer from HNU Systems
X-MET920-P Analyzer from Metorex
X-MET 920-MP Analyzer from Metorex
These technologies were tested at sites in
Tacoma, WA and Davenport, IA.
15
-------
In FY97, a demonstration of four soil sam-
pling and two soil gas samples are planned. Tech-
nologies participating in this demonstration in-
cluded:
j Simulprobe Core Barrel Samples % ,
r" ป s %, x. xs"'1* , *
* *Geoprobe Large Bore Soil Samples
-AMS Dual Tube Oner Samples
. , sx ^ ( -, ., *, .
** C^uadref Eniflux Soil Gas System
These technologies were demonstrated in
Albert City, IA and Commerce City, CO. The re-
ports will be completed in FY98.
16
-------
Future Direction
In an effort to reduce expenditures, the SITE
Program has reviewed its approach to advancing
innovative technologies. This review indicated that
operational shifts are necessary to remain in a
"state-of-the-art" position. Building on existing
strengths (e.g., demonstration design, quality as-
surance, technology transfer), the program will
shift from a technology-driven focus to a
remediation-problem focus driven by the needs
of the hazardous waste remediation community.
With this focus the remediation community should
offer sites that pose high risk to human health and/
or the environment, are common throughout a re-
gion or nationwide, or where existing remediation
methods are inadequate or too costly. The vision
for the program is to remain the premiere organi-
zation in enhancing the credibility and implemen-
tation of effective innovative remediation options.
Next Generation SITE Program
The next generation of SITE can be defined
in four operating principles, including (1) program
planning; (2) matching priority sites with technol-
ogy solutions; (3) conducting technology field
demonstrations; and (4) information dissemina-
tion.
Program Planning
To ensure the highest possible quality, over-
all program direction and strategies will be evalu-
ated each year based on input from the user com-
munity and other private and public-sector stake-
holders. As part of the overall program planning
process, SITE will develop and implement a qual-
ity management plan based on the ISO standards.
As part of this planning, the program has identi-
fied its major research areas of focus for the next
six years (see Figure 3).
Matching Priority Sites with Technology
Solutions
The goal for this action is to identify the tech-
nology needs of the user community, via working
groups, forums, personal communication, and
documentation. In the past, identifying sites for
technology vendors solicited through the program
has been an ongoing processand at times has
been problematic. The redesigned program takes
this activity a step further by soliciting and priori-
tizing sites, and then seeking appropriate technolo-
gies for demonstration at these sites. Sites have
the option of evaluating one or more technolo-
gies.
Matching sites and technologies will remain
flexible. During the solicitation, hazardous waste
sites may apply for participation in SITE in sev-
eral ways. Some example scenarios are as follows:
The site has a particular vendor and technol-
ogy chosen to address their particular
hazardous waste need.
The site has chosen a family or category of
technology with no particular vendor in
mind (i.e., in situ bioremediation, in situ
physical treatment).
The site may choose to solicit for one or
more technologies in a variety of
technology areas.
17
-------
Areas
Environmental Emphasis Areas
1997 1998 1999 2000
2001
2002
Groundwater
Organics/lnorganics
MTBE
NAPLs
Metals in Soils
Pb
Cr
Petroleum/Mixtures
Petroleum/PCBs
Petroleum/Organics
Petroleum/Metals
Chlorinated Aromatics
Town Gas
Creosote
PAHs
PCBs
Sediments
Pesticides
Chlorinated Cromatics
Metals
Brown fields
Pb in Soils
Chlorinated Cromatics
Metals
uxo
In-Situ Technology Evaluation
On-Going Remediations
Bioventing
Barriers
Ecosystem Restoration
Endocrine Disruptors
Figure 3. Environmental emphasis areas through fiscal year 2002.
If no specific technology or vendor has been
submitted in the proposals, technologies and ven-
dors will be matched to chosen sites by a team of
project participants. Participants would include,
but not be limited to, state and federal regulators,
public representatives, where appropriate, and
other federal Agencies. The team representatives
will be selected by the host site project lead and
SITE program representative.
An important aspect of technology selec-
tion is that more than one technology may be in-
troduced for the team's review and demonstration.
This allows an innovative technology match to
user sites in a manner that is advantageous to the
user from both a cost and performance perspec-
tive. The site may choose to solicit for vendors
through a specific SITE Program vendor solicita-
tion or use contractual mechanisms available to
the host site.
Technology Areas of Primary Interest
The selection of sites for the SITE Demon-
stration Program will be based on the needs of
EPA, other federal agencies, and the user com-
munity. Keeping apprised of these needs will re-
quire an ongoing dialogue with the user commu-
nity, EPA Regional Project Managers, Superfund
Technical Liaisons, other federal agencies, states,
18
-------
and others. This dialogue will ensure that the needs
of the personnel who are directly involved with
site remediation are addressed. The SITE Program
has an interest in receiving responses to its solici-
tation for participation from any site that has a
specific site problem or technology that requires
evaluation. However, the SITE Program currently
has a particular interest in evaluating in situ and
lower cost technologies. Four high priority areas
of interest for FY 1997:
1. Groundwater contaminated with organics and
inorganics.
2. Soils, sludges, and sediments containing
inorganics, heavy metals, and radioactive com-
ponents alone or in combination with organ-
ics.
3. Sites contaminated with petroleum combined
with other compounds.
4. Recalcitrant organics with low water solubil-
ity (e.g., PAHs from town gas sites and creo-
sote sites), PCBs, and pesticides).
Technology Field Demonstrations
The objective of the SITE program is to con-
duct field demonstrations and high technical qual-
ity performance verifications of viable remedia-
tion technologies. The resulting data and reports
are intended for use by the site owners and state
and federal decision-makers in selecting remedia-
tion options and for adding credibility to technol-
ogy vendors in promoting their processes. Tech-
nology demonstrations are increasingly being con-
ducted in partnership with other EPA offices, other
federal agencies (such as Department of Defense
and Department of Energy), states, private indus-
try, and universities.
The SITE Program annually solicits appli-
cations from interested private firms and federal
and state agencies with responsibility for on-site
cleanup operations at hazardous waste sites for
participation in the Demonstration Program. Co-
operative arrangements or Memoranda of Under-
standing between the SITE Program and the par-
ties responsible for the host site form the relation-
ship between SITE and the host site. There is no
contractual agreement and no funds are given to
the site as part of this arrangement. The selection
of sites for the program is based on the needs of
EPA, other federal agencies, and the technology
user community.
In the Demonstration Program, host site own-
ers are responsible for providing necessary data
related to the hydrogeology and other site condi-
tions, results of feasibility studies, and results of
waste analyses. The host site is also responsible
for all logistical requirements for the demonstra-
tion, such as availability of utilities, access to land
area at the site large enough for equipment setup,
elimination or restriction of geographical or geo-
logical hindrances, security provisions, and per-
sonnel safety provisions. Technology developers
whose systems are being demonstrated are respon-
sible for transporting equipment to the selected
site, operating their systems, and removing equip-
ment from the site upon completion of the dem-
onstration.
EPA is responsible for project planning, sam-
pling and analysis, quality assurance and quality
control, preparing full evaluation reports, and dis-
seminating cost and performance information to
environmental managers in government agencies,
the engineering community, industry, and the pub-
lic. EPA also prepares bulletins, project summa-
ries, and videos to document demonstrations.
These reports evaluate all available information
on the technology and analyze its overall applica-
bility to other site characteristics, waste types, and
waste matrices. Reports also include testing pro-
cedures and the quality assurance and quality con-
trol standards.
Information Transfer
SITE reports have been, and continue to be,
a valuable resource to the technology user com-
munity. Modifications to these reports may be
necessary as the program changes over the next
couple 'of years. Other mechanisms for informa-
tion dissemination will be necessary as electronic
communication becomes more widely used. Pub-
lished documentation, meetings, and conferences
will continue to be a large part of the dissemina-
tion for technical information. The program will
continue to focus on developing documents sum-
19
-------
marizing technology areas where data exist on a
variety of technologies or applications. This in-
formation will allow the user community to com-
pare these technologies, along with their costs and
applications. More technology areas will be sum-
marized as the SITE Program matures and infor-
mation becomes available.
20
-------
Appendix A
AH SITE Projects
(Alphabetically by State)
21
-------
State
Alabama
Alaska
Arizona
California
Developer
CMS Research Corp.
Birmingham, AL
Brice Environmental
Service Corp.
(BESCORP)
Fairbanks, AK
Arizona State Univ.
Tempe, AZ
STC Omega
(formerly Silicate
Technology Corp.)
Scottsdale, AZ
Analytical and
and Remedial
Technology, Inc.
Menlo Park, CA
Radian Corp.
(formerly AWD
Technologies,
Inc.)
Walnut Creek, CA
Berkeley Environ.
Restoration Ctr.
(formerly Udell
Technologies, Inc.)
Emeryville, CA
COGNIS, Inc.
Santa Rosa, CA
Energy and
Environmental
Research Corp.
Irvine, CA
Technology
Portable Gas
Chromatograph
Soil Washing Plant
Photocatalytic
Oxidation and Air
Stripping
Solidification and
Stabilization
Treatment
Automated Volatile
Organic Analytical
System
Integrated V apor
Extraction and
Steam Vacuum
Stripping
In situ Enhanced
Extraction
Biological/
Chemical
Treatment
Chemical
Treatment
Hybrid Fluidized
Bed System
Reactor Filter
System
Technology
Contact
H. Ashley Page
205-773-691 1
Craig Jones
907-452-2512
Gregory Raupp
602-965-2828
Stephen Pelger or
Scott Larsen
602-948-7100
D. MacKay
415-324-2259
David Bluestein
510-988-1125
Kent Udell
510-642-2928
Steve Rock
USEPA
513-569-7149
Mike Royer
USEPA
908-321-6633
Richard Koppang
714-859-8851
Neil Widmer
714-859-8851
Program
Monitoring and
Measurement
Technologies
Demonstration
Emerging
Technology
Demonstration
Monitoring and
Measurement
Technologies
Demonstration
Demonstration
Emerging
Technology
Emerging
Technology
Demonstration
Emerging
Technology
Emerging
Technology
Status
Completed
1992
Completed
September
1992
Ongoing
Completed
November
1990
Completed
May 1991
Completed
September
1990
Completed
1993
Completed
1995
Completed
1994
Completed
1994
Completed
1992
Completed
1995
22
-------
State
California
Developer
Environmental
Biotechnologies
Montara, CA
EPOC Water, Inc.
Fresno, CA
GISVSolutions, Inc.
Concord, CA
Groundwater
Technology
Government
Services, Inc.
Concord, CA
Hughes
Environmental
Systems, Inc.
Manhattan Beach,
CA
Lockheed Martin
Missiles & Space Co.,
Inc.,
Palo Alto, CA
Magnum Water
Technology
El Segundo, CA
Membrane
Technology and
Research, Inc.
Menlo Park, CA
MTI Analytical
Instruments
(formerly
Microsensor
Technology, Inc.)
Fremont, CA
NOVATERRA, Inc.
(formerly Toxic
Treatments USA,
Inc.)
Los Angeles, CA
General Atomics
(formerly Ogden
Environmental
Services)
San Diego, CA
3raxis
Environmental
Services
Burlingame, CA
Technology
Microbial
Composting
Precipitation,
Microfiltration,
Sludge Dewatering
GIS\Key
Environmental Data
Management Software
Biological
Composting
StreamEnhanced
Recovery Process
Electrokinetic
Remediation
CAV-OXฎ Process
VaporSep Membrane
Process
Portable Gas
Chromatograph
In situ and Air
Stripping
Circulating Bed
Combuster
Acoustic Barrier
Separator
In situ Steam
Enhanced
Extraction
Technology
Contact
Douglas Munneeke
415-596-1020
Rodney Squires
209-291-8144
John Saguto
415-827-5400
Ronald Hicks
510-671-2387
Paul dePercin
USEPA
513-569-7797
Steven H.
Schwartzkopf
415-424-3176
Dale Cox
310-640-7000
Marc Jacobs
Doug Goftschlich
415-328-2228
Gary Lee
415-490-0900
Philip LaMori
213-969-9782
Jeffrey Broido
619-455-4495
Robert Goforth
619-455-4057
Lloyd Stewart
415-548-9288
Program
Emerging
Technology
Demonstration
Demonstration
Demonstration
Emerging
Technology
Demonstration
Demonstration
Demonstration
Emerging
Technology
Monitoring and
Measurement
Technologies
Demonstration
Demonstration
Emerging
Technology
Demonstration
Status
Ongoing
Ongoing
Completed
May 1992
Completed
August 1993
Completed
1995
Completed
September
1993
Ongoing
Completed
March 1993
Completed
1991
Completed
992
Completed
September
989
Completed
March 1989
Completed
995
Ongoing
23
-------
State
California
Colorado
Developer
Pulse Sciences,
San Leandro, CA
Thermatrix, Inc.
(formerly Purus, Inc.)
San Jose, CA
Retech, Inc.
Ukiah. CA
Rochem Separation
Systems, Inc.
Torrance, CA
Roy F. Weston
Woodland Hills, CA
SRI Instruments
Torrance, CA
SIVE Services
Dixon, CA
Pulse
Sciences
San Leandro, CA
U.S. Fiber
(formerly Ultrox)
Huntington, CA
U.S. EPA Region IX
San Francisco, CA
XonTech, Inc.
Van Nuys, CA
Texaco, Inc.
S. El Monte, CA
Terra-Kleen Response
Group, Inc.
Del Mar, CA
Colorado School of
Mines
Golden, CO
Colorado Department
of Health
Denver, CO
Technology
X-Ray Treatment
(Aqueous)
Photolytic
Oxidation
Plasma Arc
Vitrification
Rochem Disc
Tube Module
System
Air Sparging
Process
Portable Gas
Chromatograph
Steam Injection and
Vacuum Extraction
X-Ray Treatment
(Soils)
Ultraviolet Radiation
and Oxidation
Excavation and
foam suppression
of volatiles
XonTech Sector
Sampler
Entrained-Bed
Gasification
Solvent Extraction
(2 Demonstrations)
Wetlands-Based
Treatment
Technology
Contact
Vernon Bailey
510-632-5100
Ext. 227
Steve McAdams
408-453-0490
Ronald Womack
and Leroy B. Leland
707-462-6522
David LaMonica
310-370-3160
Jeff Bannon
818-971-4900
Dave Quinn
310-214-5092
Douglas Dieter
916-678-8358
Vernon Bailey
510-632-5100
William Himebaugh
714-545-5557
Jack Hubbard
USEPA
513-569-7507
Matt Young
818-787-7380
John Wintor
310-908-7387
Alan Cash
619-558-8762
Thomas Wildeman
303-273-3642
James Lewis
303-692-3383
Program
Emerging
Technology
Emerging
Technology
Demonstration
Demonstration
Demonstration
Monitoring and
Measurement
Technologies
Demonstration
Emerging
Technology
Demonstration
Demonstration
Monitoring and
Measurement
Technologies
Demonstration
Demonstration
Emerging
Technology
Demonstration
Status
Completed
1994
Completed
1992
Completed
July 1991
Completed
August 1994
Completed
1994
Completed
January
1992
Ongoing
Ongoing
Completed
March 1989
Completed
July 1990
Completed
1991
Completed
1994
(1) Completed
1994
(2) Ongoing
Completed
Ongoing
24
_
-------
State
Colorado
Connecticut
Delaware
Florida
Developer
General Environmenta
Corp.
(formerly known as
Hydrologies, Inc.)
Englewood, CO
Pintail Systems, Inc.
Aurora, CO
Pintail Systems, Inc.
Aurora, CO
Smith Environmental
Technologies Corp.
(formerly Canonie
Environmental
Services Corp)
Englewood, CO
Smith Environmental
Technologies Corp.
(formerly Soil Tech ATP
Systems, Inc.)
Englewood, CO
(2 Demonstrations)
CF Systems Corp.
Arvada, CO
,(2 Demonstrations)
Walsh Environmental
Scientists and
Engineers
Boulder, CO
Dexsil Corp.
Hamden, CT
(4 Demonstrations)
E. I.DuPontde
Nemours and Co. and
Oberlin Filter Co.
Newark, DE and
Waukesha, Wl
High Voltage
Environmental
Applications, Inc./
Florida International
University and
Univerisity of Miami
Miami, FL
Technology
CUREฎ
Electrocoagulation
Biodegradation
of Cyanide
Biomineralization
of Metals
Low Temperature
Thermal Aeration
.Anerrobic Thermal
'Processor
Solvent Extraction
Batch Organics
Extraction Unit
Bioslurry Reactor
(Technology developed
by ECOVACorp.) !
Environmental i
Test 'Kits ,(PCB)
Chlor-N-Soil i
12000 PCB/Chloride
Analyzer
Membrane
Microfiltration '
High-Eriergy
Electron irradiation
(Aqueous)
Technology
Contact
Carl iDalrymple
.303-761-6960
Leslie Thompson
303-367-:8443
LeslieThompson
3.03^367-8443
Joseph Hutton
303-790-1747
.Joseph Hutton
303-790-1747
LV.Senriingfield *
303-420-2890
William Mahaffey !
303-670-5875 :
JackMahon
'203-288^3509
Ernes'tMayer i
'302-774-2277
sWilliam Cooper
305-593T5330 ;
Program
Demonstration
'Demonstration
Emerging
Technology
Demonstration
Demonstration
Demonstration '
'Demonstration i
Monitoring and i
Measurement
Technologies
Demonstration !
Emerging
Technology
Demonstration
Status
Completed
1995
Ongoing
Ongoing
Completed
September
1992
Completed
May 1991
and June
1992
Completed
December
1988
Ongoing
Completed
September
199.1
Completed
August
1993 ;
Completed
April-May '
199.0
Completed
1:993
Completed
1994
25
-------
State
Florida
Georgia
Idaho
Illinois
Developer
High Voltage
Environmental
Applications, Inc.
Miami, FL
POP, Inc.
West Palm Beach, FL
Funderburk and
Associates
Apollo Beach, FL
American Combustion,
Inc.
Norcross, GA
ETG, Inc.
Norcross, GA
SBP Technologies, Inc.
Stone Mountain, GA
Sonotech, Inc.
Atlanta, GA
Williams Environmental
Services, Inc. (formerly
Harmon Environmental
Services, Inc.)
Stone Mountain, GA
J. R. Simplot Co.
Pocatello, ID
(2 Demonstrations)
Morrison Knudsen
Corp^STG
Technologies
Boise, ID
Process Technologies,
Inc.
Boise, ID
Allied Signal Corp.
Des Plaines, IL
Institute of Gas
Technology
Chicago, IL
Technology
High Energy Electronic
Beam (Solids)
Ion Mobility
Spectrometry
Dechlorination and
Immobilization
PYRETRONฎ
Thermal
Destruction
Long-Path Fourier
Transform Infrared
Spectrometer
Membrane Separation
and Bioremediation
Frequency Tunable
Pulse Combustion
System
Soil Washing
Anaerobic Biological
Process
Grouting Technique
Photolytic destruction
of SVE offgases
offgases
Submerged Fixed
Film Reactor
Chemical and
Biological Treatment
Fluid Extraction-
Biological
Degradation Process
Technology
Contact
William Cooper
305-593-5330
Martin Cohen
407-683-0507
Ray Funderburk
800-723-8847
Gregory Gitman
404-564-4180
Orman Simpson
404-242-0977
Clayton Page
504-755-771 1
Ben Zinn
404-894-3033
S. Jackson Hubbard
(U.S. EPA)
513-569-7507
Russell Kaare
208-235-5620
Tom Yergovich
208-238-2850
Kathryn Levihn
Rick Raymond!
208-386-6115
Michael Swan
208-385-0900
Steve Lupton
847-391-3224
Robert Kelley
847-768-0722
Albert Paterk
847-768-0720
Program
Emerging
Technology
Monitoring and
Measurement
Technologies
Demonstration
Demonstration
Monitoring and
Measurement
Technologies
Demonstration
Demonstration
Emerging
Technology
Emerging
Technology
Demonstration
Dinoseb
TNT
Demonstration
Demonstration
Demonstration
Emerging
Technology
Emerging
Technology
Status
Ongoing
Completed
1991
Completed
October 1987
Completed
January 1 988
Completed
January 1992
Completed
October 1991
Completed
1995
Exited 1992
Completed
1993
Completed
July 1993
Completed
February 1 994
Completed
Ongoing
Ongoing
Completed
1993
Completed
1992
26
-------
State
Illinois
Indiana
Kansas
Louisiana
Developer
Institutre of Gas
OHM Remediation
Services (formerly
RUST Remedial
Services, Inc.)
Lombard, IL
Recycling Sciences,
Inc.
Chicago, IL
Wheelabrator Clean
Air Systems (formerly
Chemical Waste
Management, Inc.)
Schaumburg, IL
Bio-Rem,Jnc.
Butler, IN
Sevenson
Environmental Services
Munster, IN
Geoprobe
Salina, KS
Trinity Environmental
Technologies, Inc.
Mound Valley, KS
Advanced Remediation
Mixing, Inc. (formerly
Chemfix Technologies,
Inc.)
Kenner, LA
Electrokinetics, Inc.
Baton Rouge, LA
Technology
Fluidized-Bed
Cyclonic
Agglomerating
Incinerator
Supercritical
Extraction/Liquid Phase
Oxidation of Waste
X*TRAX Thermal
Desorption
Desorption and
Vapor Extraction
System
PO*WW*ER
Technology
Augmented In situ
Subsurface
Bioremediation
Process
MAECTITE
Treatment Process
Soil, Water, Vapor
Sampling Cone
Penetrometer
Ultrasonically Assisted
Detoxification of
Hazardous Materials
Solidification and
Stabilization
Electrokinetic
Remediation
Electro-Klean
Electrokinetic Soil
Remediation
Technology
Contact
Mike Mensinger
847-768-0602
. Anil Goyal
,347-768-0516
Mike Mensinger
.847-768-0510
ChetanTrivedi
630-261-3958
William Meenan
312-663-4242
Myron T-!eicher
708-YQ6-6900
David Mann
219-868-5823
Karl Yost
219-836-0116
'WesMcCall
.913-825-1842
Duane Koszalka
316-328-3222
David Donaldson
504-^831 r3600
:Elif Acar
504-753-8004
Program
Emerging
Technology
Emerging
Technology
Demonstration
Demonstration
Demonstration
Demonstration
Demonstration
^Monitoring and
'Measuring
Technologies
Emerging
Technology
Demonstration
Emerging
Technology
Demonstration
Emerging
Technology
Status
Completed
Ongoing
Completed
'May.1992
Ongoing
Completed
September
1992
Completed
December
1993
Ongoing
Completed
1995
Completed
1992
Completed
March 1989
Completed
1393
Ongoing
Ongoing
,27
-------
State
Maine
Maryland
Massachusetts
Developer
Binax Corp., Antox
Div.
South Portland, ME
Miorosensor System,
Inc.
Havre de Grace, MD
SOAPS U.S. Army
Environmental Center
APG, MD
ABB Environmental
Services, Inc.
Wakefield, MA
Bruker Instruments
Billerica, MA
Maxymillian Tech., Inc.
(formerly known as
Clean Berkshires)
Lanesboro, MA
UV Technologies, Inc.
(formerly Energy and
Environmental
Engineering, Inc.)
East Cambridge, MA
HNU Systems, Inc.
Newtown, MA
(3 Demonstrations)
KSE, Inc.
Amherst, MA
Millipore Corp.
Bedford, MA
Niton Corp.
Bedford, MA
Technology
Immunoassay for PCB
in Soil
Portable Gas
Chromatograph
Laser Fluorescence
PAH, BTEX, Screening
Cone Penetrometer
Two-Zone Plume
Interception In situ
Treatment Strategy
Anaerobic/Aerobic
Sequential
Bioremediation of
Bruker Mobile
Environmental Monitor
High Temperature
Thermal Process
Laser-Induced
Photochemical
Oxidative Destruction
Portable Gas
Chromatograph
Portable X-ray
Fluorescence
Spectrometer
PGP Test Kit
Air Integrated Reaction
Photocatalytic Treatment
of Air
EnviroGard PCB
Immunoassay Test Kit
Immunoassay for PCP
(Soil, Water)
Portable X-ray
Fluorescence
Spectrometer
Technology
Contact
Roger Piasio
207-772-3544
N. L. Jarvis
410-939-1089
George Robitaille
401-671-1576
Willard Murray
617-245-6606
Willard Murray
617-245-6606
John Wronka
506-667-9580
Jim Maxymillian
617-557-6077
James Porter
617-666-5500
Clayton Wood
617r964-6690
John Moore
617-964-6690
Bob Labiberte
800-726-6690
J. R. Kittrell
413-549-5506
Alan Weiss
617-275-9200
Stephen Shefsky
617-275-9275
Program
Monitoring and
Measurement
Technologies
Monitoring and
Measurement
Technologies
Monitoring and
Measurement
Technologies
Emerging
Technology
Emerging
Technology
Monitoring and
Measurement
Technologies
Demonstration
Emerging
Technology
Monitoring and
Measurement
Technologies
Monitoring and
Measurement
Technologies
Monitoring and
Measurement
Technologies
Emerging
Technology
Monitoring and
Measurement
Technologies
Monitoring and
Measurement
Technologies
Status
Completed
1992
Completed
1995
Completed
1995
Completed
Ongoing
Completed
September
Completed
December
1993
Completed
1993
Completed
January 1 992
Completed
1995
Completed
1993
Ongoing
Completed
1992
Completed
1993
Completed
1995
28
-------
State
Massachusetts
Minnesota
Montana
Nebraska
Nevada
New Jersey
Developer
Ohmicron Corp.
Newton, MA
PSI Technology Co.
Andover, MA
BioTrol, Inc.
Eden Prairie, MN
Membrane Corp.
Minneapolis, MN
Montana College of
Mineral Science &
Technology
Butte, MT
University of Nebraska
Lincoln, NE
U.S. EPA
Las Vegas, NV
Accutech Remedial
Systems, Inc.
Keyport, NJ
ART International, Inc.
(formerly Enviro
Sciences, Inc.)
Denville, NJ
Dehydro-Tech. Corp.
Somerville, NJ
M. L ENERGIA, Inc.
Princeton, NJ
Technology
Immunoassay for PGP
in Soil
Metals Immobilization and
Decontamination of
Aggregate Solids
Methanotrophic Bioreacto
System
Biological Aqueous
Treatment System
Soil Washing System
Membrane Gas Transfer
in Waste Remediation
Air-Sparged Hydrocyclone
Campbell Centrifugal Jig
Spray Irrigation
Field Analytical Screening
Program (FASP)
Pneumatic Fracturing
Extraction and Catalytic
Oxidation
Low-Energy Solvent
Extraction Process
Carver-Greenfield
Processฎ for Extraction
of Oily Waste
Reductive Photo-
Dechlorination Treatment
Reductive Photo-Thermal
Oxidation Processes for
for Chlorocarbons
Technology
Contact
Mary Hayes
215-860-5115
Joseph Morency
508-689-0003
Durell Dobbins
612-942-8032
Dennis Chilcote
612-942-8032
Dennis.Chilcote
612-942-8032
Charles Gantzer
612-378-2160
Theodore Jordan
406-496-4112
Gordon Ziesing
406-496-1473
Roy Spalding
Lary Jack
702-798:2373
John Liskowite
908-739-6444
Werner Steiner
201-627-7601
Theodore
Trowbridge
908-904-1606
Moshe Lavid
609-799-7970
Moshe Lavid
609-799-7970
Program
Monitoring and
Measurement
Technologies
Emerging
Technology
Emerging
Technology
Demonstration
Demonstration
Emerging
Technology
Emerging
Technology
Emerging
Technology
Demonstration
Monitoring and
Measurement
Technologies
Demonstration
Emerging
Technlogy
Demonstration
Emerging
Technology
Emerging
Technology
Status
Completed
1993
Completed
1993
Completed
1992
Completed
July-
September
1989
Completed
September-
October 1 989
Ongoing
Completed
1994
Ongoing
Completed
1996
Completed
Completed
August 1992
Completed
1994
Completed
August 1991
Completed
995
Ongoing
29
-------
State
New Jersey
New Mexico
New York
Developer
Hazardous Substance
Management Research
Center at New Jersey
Institute of Technology
Newark, NJ
New Jersey Institute
of Technology
Newark, NJ
New Jersey Institute
of Technology
Jersey City, NJ
Sentex Sensing
Technology, Inc.
Ridgefield, NJ
Billings and Associates,
Inc.
Albuquerque, NM
Resource Management
and Recovery (formerly
Bio-Recovery Systems,
Inc.
Las Cruces, NM
Sandia National
Laboratories
Albuquerque, NM
SBP Technologies, Inc.
White Plains, NY
Solucorp Industries
West Nyack, NY
RECRA Envionmental,
Inc.
(formerly Electro-Pure
Systems, Inc.)
Amherst,NY
Photovac International,
Inc.
Deer Park, NY
State University of New
York at Oswego
Oswego, NY
Xerox Corp.
Webster, NY
Technology
Pneumatic Fracturing/
Bioremediation
GHEA Associates
Process
Cold Top Vitrification
Portable Gas
Chromatograph
Subsurface Volitilization
and Ventilation System
AlgaSorb Biological
Sorption
Electrokinetic Extraction
in Unsaturated Soils
Bioventing, Air
Sparging, Biological
Treatment for Ground
Water (Multi-developer
project with State of
New York)
Molecular Bonding
System
Alternating Current
Electrocoagulation
Technology
Portable Gas
Chromatograph
Photocatalytic Treatment
for Sediments
Ground Water Extraction
Technology
Contact
John Schuring
201-596-5849
Itzhak Gottlieb
201-226-4642
William Librizzi
201-596-5.846
Amos Linenberg
201-945-3694
Gale Billings
505-345-1116
Mike Hosea
505-382-9228
Eric Lindgren
505-844-0543
Richard Desrosiers
914-694-2280
Robert Kuhn
914-623-2333
Kenneth Kinecki
800-527-3272
Mark Collins
516-254-4199
Ronald Scrudato
315-341-3639
Ron Mess
716-422-9211
Program
Emerging
Technology
Emerging
Technology
Demonstration
Monitoring and
Measurement
Technologies
Demonstration
Emerging
Technology
Demonstration
Demonstration
Demonstration
Emerging
Technology
Monitoring and
Measurement
Technologies
Emerging
Technology
Demonstration
Status
Completed
1994
Completed
1992
Ongoing
Completed
January 1 992
Completed
May 1994
Completed
1990
Ongoing
Completed
1995
Ongoing
Completed
1992
Completed
January 1 992
Completed
1995
Completed
1995
30
-------
State
North Carolina
;
Ohio
Developer
Ensys, Inc.
Research Triangle Park
NG , .
Ensys, Inc.
Morrisville, NC
(2 Demonstrations)
Battelle Memorial
Institute
Columbus, OH
Ferro Corp.
Independence, OH
IT Corp.
Cincinnati, OH
OHM Remediation
Services Corp.
Findlay, OH
University of Dayton
Research Institute
Dayton, OH
U.S. EPA NRMRLand
ETG Environmental
Cincinnati, OH
U.S. EPA
NRMRL
Cincinnati, OH
U.S. EPA Risk
Reduction Engineering
Laboratory and IT Corp.
Cincinnati, OH
U.S. EPA NRMRL
Cincinnati, OH (and
Intech 1 80 Corp.
N. Logan, UT)
U.S.EPARisk
Reduction Engineering
Laboratory and
FRX, Inc.
Cincinnati, OH
Technology
Immunoassay for PCP
Immunoassay for PCP
In Situ Electroacoustic
Soil Decontamination
Waste Vitrification
Through Electric Melting
Chelation/Electro-
deposition of Toxic Metals
from Soils
Oxygen Microbubble In
Situ Bioremediation
Photothermal
Detoxification Unit (PDU)
Base-Catalyzed
Dechlorination Process
Bioventing
Volume Reduction Unit
Debris Washing System
Fungal Treatment
Technology
Hydraulic Fracturing
Technology
Contact
Stephen Friedman
914-941-5509
Aisling Scallen
919-941-5509
Satya Chauhan
614-424-4812
S. K. Muralidhar
216-641-8580
Radha Krishnan
513-782-4700
Douglas Jerger
419-424-4932
John Graham
513-229-2846
George Huffman
513-569-7431
Yei-Shong Shieh
215-832-0700
Paul McCauley
513-569-7444
Richard Griffiths
513-569-7832
Michael Taylor or
Majid Dosani
513-782-4700
John Glaser
513-569-7568
Richard Lamar
801-753-2111
William Slack
513-556-2526
Program
Monitoring and
Measurement
Monitoring and
Measurement
Technologies
Emerging
Technology
Emerging
Technology
Emerging
Technology
Emerging
Technology
Emerging
Technology
Demonstration
Demonstration
Demonstration
Demonstration
Demonstration
Demonstration
Status
Completed
September
1993
Completed
Completed
Completed
Completed
Ongoing
Ongoing
Completed
1994
Completed
August 1993
Ongoing
Completed
November
1992
Completed
August 1990
Completed
November
1992
Completed
September
1992
31
-------
State
Oklahoma
Oregon
Pennsylvania
Developer
Gec-Microbial
Technologies
Ochelata, OK
Metorex, Inc.
Bend, OR
Aluminum Company of
America (formerly
Alcoa Separations
Technology, Inc.)
Pittsburgh, PA
EG&G Environmental,
Inc.
Pittsburgh, PA
Center for Hazardous
Materials Research
Pittsburgh, PA
Horsehead Resource
Development Co., Inc.
Palmerton, PA
Lewis Environmental
Services, Inc.
Pittsburgh, PA
Ohmicron Corp.
Newtown, PA
Calgon Carbon
Oxidation Technologies
(formerly
Peroxidation
Systems, Inc.)
Pittsburgh, PA
R.E.Wright
Middletown, PA
Geo-Con, Inc.
Monroeville, PA
(2 Demonstrations)
Technology
New Technology for Metals
Release and Removal
from Wastes
Field Portable X-ray
Fluorescence (FPXRF)
Bioscrubber
NoVOCs In Well
Stripping
Acid Extraction Treatment
System
Lead Smelting
Organics Destruction and
Metals Stabilization
Flame Reactor
Soil Leaching Process
Immunoassay for PCP
perox-pur Chemical
Oxidation
Bioventing, Air Sparging,
Biological Treatment for
Ground Water (Multi-
developer project with
state of New York)
In situ Solidification
and Stabilization
Technology
Contact
Donald Hitzman
918-535-2281
Jim Pasmore
503-385-6748
Paul Liu
412-826-3711
James Beninati
412-920-5401
Stephen Paff
412-826-5321
Regis Zagrocki
610-826-8818
Tom Lewis III
412-322-8100
Dave Hertzog
215-860-5115
Bertrand Dussert
412-787-6681
Richard Cronce
717-944-5501
Linda Ward
Robert Hayden
412-856-7700
Program
Emerging
Technology
Monitoring and
Measuring
Technologies
Emerging
Technology
Demonstration
Emerging
Technology
Emerging
Technology
Demonstration
1)
Emerging
Technology
Monitoring and
Measurement
Technologies
Demonstration
Demonstration
Demonstration
Status
Ongoing
Completed
1995
Completed
1993
Ongoing
Completed
1992
Completed
1993
Completed
1995
Completed
1991
Ongoing
Completed
1993
Completed
September
1992
Completed
1995
Completed
April - May
1988
32
-------
State
Pennsylvania
South Carolina
Tennessee
Texas
Developer
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
West Chester, PA
Vortec Corp.
Collegeville, PA
University of South
Carolina
Columbia, SC
Bergmann USA
Gallatin, TN
IT Corporation
Knoxville.TN
Brown and Root
Environmental/
Illinois Institute of
Technology
Oak Ridge, TN
Brown and Root/KAl
Oak Ridge, TN
WASTECH, Inc.
Oak Ridge, TN
Thermo NUtech
(formerly TMA Eberline)
Oak Ridge, TN
North American
Technologies, Inc./
APROTEK
Bellaire, TX
Technology
Low Temperature Thermal
: Treatment System
Steam Regeneration
Adsorption System
(Ambersorb)
Oxidation and Vitrification
Process
In Situ Migration of Acid
Water
Soil and Sediment
Washing Technology
Batch Steam Distillation-
and Metal Extraction
Eimco Biolift Slurry
Reactor as developed by
Tekno Associates
Mixed Waste Treatment
Process
Photolytic and Biological
Soil Detoxification
Radio Frequency Heating
Radio Frequency Heating
Solidification and
Stabilization
Segmented Gate System
for Radioactive Materials
Oleofilter
Technology
Contact
Mike Cosmos
215-430-7423
John Thoroughgood
610-701-3728
James Hnat
215-489-2255
Frank Caruccio
803-777-4512
George Jones.
423-230-2217
Stuart Shealy
423-690-321 1
Kandi Brown
423-690-321 1
Ed Alperin
423-690-321 1
Duane Graves
615-690-3211
Clifton Blanchard
423-483-9900
Harsh Dev
312-567-4257
Clifton Blanchard
615-483-9900
Raymond Kasevich
603-431-2266
Terremce Lyons
USEPA
513-569-7589
Jeff Brown
423-481-0683
Alan Bell
713-662-2699
Program
Demonstration
Emerging
Technology
Emerging
Technology
Demonstration
Emerging
Technology
Demonstration
Emerging
Technology
Emerging
Technology
Emerging
Technology
Emerging
Technology
Demonstration
Demonstration
Demonstration
Emerging
Technology '
Demonstration
Status
Completed
December
1992
Completed
1995
Completed
1993
Ongoing
Completed
1995
Completed
May 1992
Completed
1992
Completed
1995
Completed
1995
Completed
1993
Completed
August 1993
Completed
1994
Completed
August 1991
Ongoing
Completed
June 1994
33
-------
State
Texas
Utah
Virginia
Developer
EET, Inc.
Bellaire.TX
ENSR Consulting
Engineering and Larson
Engineering
Houston, TX
Filter Flow Technology,
Inc.
League City, TX
Fugro Geosciences, Inc.
Houston, TX
Hrubetz Environmental
Services, Inc.
Dallas, TX
Solidtech, Inc.
Houston, TX
TN Spectrace
Round Rock, TX
University of Houston
Houston, TX
Western Product
Recovery Group, Inc.
Houston, TX
Phytokinetics, Inc.
North Logan, UT
BioGenesis Enterprises,
Inc.
(formerly BioVersal
USA)
Fairfax Station, VA
Dynaphore, Inc.
Richmond, VA
Babcock and Wilcox
Co.
Lynchburg, VA
Technology
PCB/Metals Extraction
from Porous Services
Bioventing, Air Sparging,
Biological Treatment for
Ground Water (Multi-
developer project with
state of New York)
Heavy Metals and
Radionuclide Sorption
Method
Laser Fluorescence PAH,
BTEX Screening Cone
Penetrometer
HRUBOUTฎ Process
Solidification and
Stabilization
Portable X-ray
Fluorescence
Spectrometer
Concentrated Salt
Extraction of Lead
CCBA Physical and
Chemical Treatment
Phytoremediation of Soils
BioGenesis Soil
Washing Process
Removal of Dissolved
Heavy Metals via
FORAGER sponge
Cyclone Furnace
Technology
Contact
Mike Bonem
713-662-0727
David Ramsden
(ENSR)
713-520-6802
N. Sathiyakumar
716-272-7310
Todd Johnson
281-332-3438
1-800-753-8476
Michael Hrubetz or
Barbara Hrubetz
214-363-7833
Jack Hubbard
USEPA
513-569-7507
Raj Natrajan
512-388-9200
Dennis Clifford
713-743-4266
Donald Kelly
713-493-9321
Bert Elkins
619-749-8856
Ari Ferro
801-750-0985
Charles Wilde
703-913-9700
Norman Rainer
804-288-7109
Evan Reynolds
804-522-6000
Program
Demonstration
Demonstration
Demonstration
September
Monitoring and
Measuring
Technologies
Demonstration
Demonstration
Monitoring and
Measuring
Technologies
Emerging
Technology
Emerging
Technology
Emerging
Technology
Demo
Demonstration
Demonstration
Emerging
Technology
Demonstration
Status
Ongoing
Completed
1995
Completed
1993
Completed
1996
Completed
February
1993
Completed
December
1988
Completed
1995
Ongoing
Completed
1994
Ongoing
Ongoing
Completed
November
1992
Completed
April 1994
Completed
1992
Completed
November
1991
34
-------
State
Washington
Wisconsin
Wyoming
Developer
RKK Ltd.
Arlington, WA
Geosafe Corp.
Richland, WA
Remediation
Technologies, Inc.
(ReTec)
Seattle, WA
Ionics/Resources
Conservation Co.
Bellevue, WA
Scitec Corp.
Richland, WA
University of
Washington
Seattle, WA
Svedala Industries
(formerly Allis
Mineral Systems, Inc.)
Oak Creek, Wl
University of Wisconsin
Madison, Wl
Western Research
Institute
Laramie, WY
Technology
CRYOCELL Freeze
Barrier
In Situ Vitrification
Methanotrophic Biofilm
Reactor
. Liquid and Solids
Biological Treatment
BEST Solvent Extraction
Reid Portable X-ray
Fluorescence
Adsorptive Filtration
Pyrokiln Thermal
Encapsulation Process
Photoelectrocatalytic
Treatment of Metals and
Organics in Water
Contained Recovery of
Oily Wastes (CROW)
Technology
Contact
Ronald Krieg
360-653-4844
James Hansen
509-375-0710
Hans Stroo
206-624-9349
Merv Cooper
206-624-9349
William Heins
206-828-2400
Steve Santy
1-800-466-5323
Mark Benjamin
206-543-7645
Jim Kidd
414-798-6341
Glenn Heian
414-762-1190
Marc Anderson
602-262-2674
Lyle Johnson
307-721-2281
Program
Demonstration
Demonstration
Emerging
Technology
Demontration
Demonstration
Monitoring and
Measurement
Technologies
Emerging
Technology
Emerging
Technology
Emerging
Technology
Emerging
Technology
Demonstration
Status
Ongoing .
Completed
1994
Completed
1995
Completed
1996
Completed
July 1992
Completed
1995
Completed
1992
Completed
1993
Ongoing
Completed
1991
Ongoing
35
-------
International Participants
State
Canada
England/
United Kingdom
Developer
Atomic Energy of
of Canada, Limited
Chalk River, Ontario
ConeTech
Investigations
Vancouver, British
Columbia
ELI Eco Logic
International, Inc.
Rockwood, Ontario
(2 Demonstrations)
EnviroMetal
Technologies, Inc.
(2 Demonstrations)
Guelph, Ontario
Grace Dearborn, Inc.
Mississauga, Ontario
Matrix Photocatalytic
Ltd. (formerly Nutech
Environmental)
London, Ontario
Toronto Harbor
Commission
Toronto, Ontario
Wastewater Technology
Centre
Burlington, Ontario
Zenon Environmental
Systems, Inc.
Burlington, Ontario
AEA Technology
(formerly Warren Spring
Laboratory)
Oxfordshire. England
Technology
Ultrasonic-Acid Leachate
Treatment for Mixed
Wastes
Chemical Treatment and
Ultrafiltration
Resistivity, pH, Seismic,
Temperature, Cone
Penetrometer
Thermal Gas Phase
Reduction and Thermal
Desorption Process
Metal Enhanced Abiotic
Degradation
Daramend Process
TiO2 Phtocatalytic
Treatment of Aqueous
Waste Streams
TIO2 Photocatalytic
Air Treatment
Soil Recycling
Cross-Flow Pervaporation
System
Cross-Flow Pervaporation
System
ZenoGem Process
Physical and Chemical
Treatment
Technology
Contact
Shiv Vijayan
613-584-3311
Ext. 3220
Leo Buckley
613-584-3311
Ward Phillips
604-327-431 1
Jim Nash
519-856-9591
Larry Kwicinski
519-824-0432
Alan Seech
905-272-7480
Bob Henderson
519-660-8669
Bob Henderson
519-660-8669
Teri Richardson
USEPA
513-569-7949
Chris Lipski
416-336-4689
Phil Canning
905-639-6320
Chris Lipski
905-639-6320
Steve Barber
44-1235-463062
Program
Emerging
Technology
Emerging
Technology
Monitoring and
Measuring
Technologies
Demonstration
Demonstration
Ex situ
In situ
Demonstration
Emerging
Technology
Demonstration
Emerging
Technology
Demonstration
Demonstration
Emerging
Technology
Demonstration
Demonstration
Emerging
Technology
Status
Completed
Completed
1993
Completed
1992
Completed
December
1992
Completed
1995
Ongoing
Completed
1994
Completed
1993
Completed
1995
Completed
1994
Ongoing
Completed
April-May
1992
Completed
1992
Completed
1995
Completed
1995
Completed
1994
36
-------
State
England/
United Kingdom
1990
Italy
Puerto Rico
Developer
Graseby Ionics, Ltd.
Waterford Herts,
England
Gruppo Italimpresse
[developed by Shirco
Infrared Systems, Inc.]
(formerly ECOVA)
Rome, Italy
(2 Demonstrations)
Terra Vac, Inc.
San Juan, PR
Technology
Ion Mobility Spectrometry
Infrared Thermal
Destruction
In Situ Vacuum
Extraction
Technology
Contact
John Brokenshire
011-44-923-816166
Martin Cohen
407-683-0507
Laurel Staley
USEPA
513-569-7863
James Malot
787-725-8750
Program
Measuring and
Monitoring
Technologies
Demonstration
Demonstration
Status
Completed
Summer
and Fall 1990
Completed,
August 1 987
and
November
1987
Completed
December
1987-April
1988
37
-------
-------
Appendix B
PubliGations
39
-------
Documents from the
US EPA National Risk Management Research Laboratory
Land Remediation & Pollution Control Division
Measuring & Monitoring Program
General Publications
SITE Program: Annual Report to Congress 1995 (EPA/540/R-97/500)
SITE Profiles, Ninth Edition (EPA/540/R-97/502)
Survey of Materials Handling Technologies Used at Hazardous Waste
Sites (EPA/540/2-91/010) PB91-9212832
Interim Status Report U.S. and German Bilateral Agreement on Remediation of Hazardous
Waste Sites (EPA/540/R-94/500) PB94-1648112
SITE Innovation on the Move (EPA/540/F-97/500)
Demonstration Project Results
Accutech Remedial Systems, Inc.Pneumatic
Fracturing Extraction and Hot Gas Injec., Phase 1
Technology Evaluation (EPA/540/R-93/509)
PB93-2165962
Technology Demo. Summary (EPA/540/SR-
93/509)3
Demonstration Bulletin (EPA/540/MR-93/509)3
Applications Analysis (EPA/540/AR-93/509)
PB94-1174392
American Combustion, Inc. - Oxygen Enhanced
Incineration
Technology Evaluation (EPA/540/5-89/008)
Applications Analysis (EPA/540/A5-89/008)
Technology Demo. Summary (EPA/540/S5-89/008)3
Demonstration Bulletin (EPA/540/M5-89/008)3
A\VD Technologies, Inc. - Integrated Vapor
Extraction and Steam Vacuum Stripping
Applications Analysis (EPA/540/A5-91/002)
PB92-2183792
Demonstration Bulletin (EPA/540/M5-91/002)3
Babcock & Wilcox Co-Cyclone Furnace Vitrification
Technology Evaluation Vol. 1 (EPA/540/R-
92/017A) PB92-2222152
Technology Evaluation Vol. 11 (EPA/540/R-
92/017B) PB92-2222232
Applications Analysis (EPA/540/AR-92/017)
PB93-1223152
Technology Demo. Summary (EPA/540/SR-
92/017)3
Demonstration Bulletin (EPA/540/MR-92/011)
Bergman USA - Soil and Sediment Washing System
Demonstration Bulletin (EPA/540/MR-92/075)3
Applications Analysis (EPA/540/AR-92/075)
Biogenesis Enterprises, Inc. - Soil and Sediment
Washing Processes
ซ Demonstration Bulletin (EPA/540/MR-93/510)
Innovative Technology Evaluation Report
(EPA/540/R-93/510)
SITE Technology Capsule (EPA/540/SR-93/510)
Bio-Rem, Inc. - Augmented In-Situ Subsurface Biorem
Process
Demonstration Bulletin (EPA/540/MR-93/527)3
BioTrol - Biological Aqueous Treatment System
Technology Evaluation (EPA/540/5-91/001)
PB92-1100482
Applications Analysis (EPA/540/A5-91/001)
PB91-227983
Technology Demo. Summary (EPA/540/S5-91/001)
' Demonstration Bulletin (EPA/540/M5-91/001)3
- Soil Washing System
Technology Evaluation Vol. 1 (EPA/540/5-91/003a)
PB92-1153102
Technology Evaluation Vol. 11 Part A
(EPA/540/5-9 l/003b) PB92-1153282
Technology Evaluation Vol. 11 Part B
(EPA/540/5-9 l/003c) PB92-1153362
Applications Analysis (EPA/540/A5-91/003)
PB92-1152452
. Technology Demo. Summary (EPA/540/S5-91/003)
PB92-2243932
Demonstration Bulletin (EPA/540/M5-91/003)3
' Order documents free of charge by calling EPA's
Center for Environmental Research Information
(CER1) at 513-569-7562 or Fax 513-569-8695.
'Documents with a PB number are out of stock and
must be ordered by that number at cost from:
40
National Technical Information Service
5285 Port Royal Road
Springfield VA 22161
Telephone 703-487-4650 or 1-800-553-6847
3 Out of stock
-------
Brice Environmental Services Corporation - Bescorp
Soil Washing System Battery Enterprises Site
Demonstration Bulletin (EPA/540/MR-93/503)3
Applications Analysis (EPA/540/AR-93/503)
PB95-1997412
Brown and Root Environmental - Subsurface
Volatilization and Ventilation System
Demonstration Bulletin (EPA/540/MR-94/529)
Capsule (EPA/540/R-94/529a)
Innovative Tech. Eval. Report (EPA/540/R-94/529)
Canonie Environmental Services Corporation - Low
Temperature Thermal Aeration (LTTA)
Demonstration Bulletin (EPA/540/MR-93/504)3
Applications Analysis (EPA/540/AR-93/504)
CF Systems Corporation - Liquified Gas Solvent
Extraction
Technology Evaluation Vol. 1 (EPA/540/5-90/002)
Technology Evaluation Vol. 11 (EPA/540/5-
90/002a) PB90-1865032
Applications Analysis (EPA/540/A5-90/002)
Technology Demo. Summary (EPA/540/S5-90/002)
Chemfix Technologies, Inc. (Now Advanced
Remediation Mixing, Inc.) - Chemical
Fixation/Stabilization
Technology Evaluation Vol. 1 (EPA/540/5-
89/01 la) PB91-1276962
Technology Evauation Vol.11 (EPA/540/5-89/01 Ib)
PB90-2741272
Applications Analysis (EPA/540/A5-89/011)
Technology Demo. Summary (EPA/540/S5-89/011)
PB91-9213732
Demonstration Bulletin (EPA/540/M5-89/011)3
Chemical Waste Management, Inc. - X-TRAX
Thermal Desorption System (Now OHM
Environmental)
Demonstration Bulletin (EPA/540/MR-93/502)3
Cognis, Inc. Removal of Lead from Soils
Demonstration Bulletin (EPA/540/MR-95/535)
Dehydro-Tech Corporation - Carver - Greenfield
Process
Technology Evaluation (EPA/540/R-92/002)3
PB92-2174622
Applications Analysis (EPA/540/AR-92/002)
Technology Demo. Summary (EPA/540/SR-92/002)
Demonstration Bulletin (EPA/540/MR-92/002)
Dupont/Oberlin - Membrane Microfiltration System
Technology Evaluation (EPA/540/5-90/007)3
PB92-1534102
ซ Applications Analysis (EPA/540/A5-90/007)
PB92-1190232
Technology Demo. Summary (EPA/540/S5-90/007)
PB92-2243512
Demonstration Bulletin (EPA/540/M5-90/007)3
Dynaphore, Inc. - Forager Sponge Technology
Demonstration Bulletin (EPA/540/MR-94/522)
Capsule (EPA/540/R-94/522a)
PB95-2132292
Innovative Tech. Eval. Rept. (EPA/540/R-94/522)
PB95-2680412
ECOVA Corporation - Bioslurry Reactor [Pilot-Scale
Demonstration of Slurry-Phase Biological Reactor for
Creosote-Contaminated Wastewater]
Technology Evaluation Vol. 1 (EPA/540/5-91/009)
PB93-2055322
Applications Analysis (EPA/540/A5-91/009)
PB94-124039
Technology Demo. Summary (EPA/540/S5-91/009)
Demonstration Bulletin (EPA/540/M5-91/009)3
ELI Eco Logic International, Inc.
- GasPhase Chemical Reduction
Demonstration Bulletin (EPA/540/MR-93/522)3
Technology Evaluation Vol. 1 (EPA/540/R-93/522a)
PB95-1002512
Technology Evaluation Appendices
(EPA/540/R-93/522b) PB95-1002512
Applications Analysis (EPA/540/AR-93/522)
Technology Demo. Summary (EPA/540/SR-93/522)
- Thermal Desorption Unit
Demonstration Bulletin (EPA/540/MR-94/504)3
Applications Analysis (EPA/540/AR-94/504
EnviroMetal Technologies, Inc. - Metal-Enhanced
Abiotic Degradation Technology
Demonstration Bulletin (EPA/540/MR-95/510)3
EPOC Water, Inc. - Microfiltration Technology
Demonstration Bulletin (EPA/540/MR-93/513)3
Applications Analysis (EPA/540/AR-93/513)
Filter Flow Technology, Inc. - Colloid Polishing Filter
Method
Demonstration Bulletin (EPA/540/MR-94/501)
Capsule (EPA/540/R-94/501 a)
PB95-1227922
Innovative Tech. Eval. Rept. (EPA/540/R-94/501)
Geosafe Corporation - In-Situ Vitrification
Demonstration Bulletin (EPA/540/MR-94/520)3
1 Order documents free of charge by calling EPA's
Center for Environmental Research Information
(CERI) at 513-569-7562 or Fax 513-569-8695.
2 Documents with aPB number are out of stock and
must be ordered by that number at cost from:
41
National Technical Information Service
5285 Port Royal Road
Springfield VA 22161
Telephone 703-487-4650 or 1-800-553-6847
3 Out of stock
-------
Capsule (EPA/540/R-94/520a)
PB95-1771012
Innovative Tech. Eval. Rept. (EPA/540/R-94/520)
CIS/Solutions, Inc. - GIS/KEY Environmental Data
Management System
Demonstration Bulletin (EPA/540/MR-94/505)3
. Capsule (EPA/540/SR-94/505)3
. Innovative Tech. Eval. Rept. (EPA/540/R-94/505)
PB95-1383192
Grace Dearborn Bioremediation Technology
Capsule (EPA/540/R-95/536a)
Gruppa Italimpresse (developed by Shirco Infrared
Systems, Inc.) - Infrared Incineration
Technology Evaluation - Peake Oil Vol. 1
(EPA/540/5-88/002a) PB89-1259912
Technology Evaluation Report - Peake Oil Vol. 11
ฃEPA/540/5-88/002b) PB89-1160242 ,.
* Technology Evaluation - Rose Township
(EPA/540/5-89/007a) PB89-1679022
Technology Evaluation- Rose Township Vol. 11
(EPA/540/5-89/007b) PB89-1679102
Applications Analysis (EPA/540/A5-89/010)
PB89-2334232
Technology Demo Summary (EPA/540/S5-89/007)5
Demonstration Bulletin (EPA/540/M5-88/002)3
Hazcon, Inc. (now Funderburk and Assoc.) -
Solidification Process
Technology Evaluation Vol. 1 (EPA/540/5-89/00la)
, PB89-1588102
Technology Evaluation Vol. 11 (EPA/540/5-
89/OOlb) PB89-1588283
Applications Analysis (EPA/540/A5-89/001)
PB89-2060312
Technology Demo Summary (EPA/540/S5-89/001)'
. Demonstration Bulletin (EPA/540/M5-89/001)3
Horschead Resource Development Co., Inc. - Flame
Reactor
. Technology Evaluation Vol. 1 (EPA/540/5-91/005)
PB92-2058552
Applications Analysis (EPA/540/A5-91/005)
PB92-213214
Technology Demo Summary (EPA/540/S5-91/005)
Demonstration Bulletin (EPA/540/M5-91 /005)
Hrubetz Environmental Services, Inc. - HRUBOUT
Process
Demonstration Bulletin (EPA/540/MR-93/524)3
Hughes Environmental Systems, Inc. - Steam
Enhanced Recovery Process
Demonstration Bulletin (EPA/540/MR-94/510)3
Capsule (EPA/540/R-94/51 Oa)
Innovative Tech. Eval. Rept. (EPA/540/R-94/510)
IT Research Institute (Brown and Root Environmental,
Inc.) - Radio Frequency Heating
Demonstration Bulletin (EPA/540/MR-94/527)
Capsule (EPA/540/R-94/527a)
Innovative Tech. Eval. Rept. (EPA/540/R-94/527)
International Waste Technologies/Geo-Con, Inc. - In-
Situ Solidification and Stabilization Process
Technology Evaluation Vol. 1 (EPA/540/5-89/004a)
PB90-1941612
Technology Evaluation Appendices
(EPA/540/R-93/522b) PB95-1002512
Technology Evaluation Vol. 11 (EPA/540/5-89)004b)
PB89-1941792
Technology Evaluation Vol. Ill
(EPA/540/5-89/004c) PB90-2690692
Technology Evaluation Vol. IV (EPA/540/5-89/004d)
PB90-2690772
Applications Analysis (EPA/540/A5-89/004)
PB90-2690852
ซ Technology Demo. Summary (EPA/540/S5-89/004)'
Technology Demo. Summary, Update Report
(EPA/540/S5-89/004a)3
Demonstration Bulletin (EPA/540/M5-89/004)3
KAI Technologies Inc./Brown and Root Environmental
Radio Frequency Heating
Demonstration Bulletin (EPA/540/MR-94/528)
Capsule (EPA/540/R-94/528a)
Innovative Tech. Eval. Report (EPA/540/R-94/528)
Magnum Water Technology - CAV-OX Ultraviolet
Oxidation Process
Demonstration Bulletin (EPA/540/MR-93/520)3
Applications Analysis (EPA/540/AR-93/520)
PB94-1894382
Technology Evaluation Rep. (EPA/540/R-93/520)
PB95-1661612
. Technology Demo Summary (EPA/540/SR-93/520)3
Maxymillian Technologies (formerly Clean Berkshires,
Inc.) - Thermal Desorption System
Demonstration Bulletin (EPA/540/MR-94/507)
Capsule (EPA/540/R-94/507a)
PB95-1228002
New York State Multi-Vendor Bioremediation:
- ENSR Consulting & Engineering/Larson Engineers -
Ex-Situ Biovault
Demonstration Bulletin (EPA/540/MR-95/524)
1 Order documents free of charge by calling EPA's
Center for Environmental Research Information
(CERI) at 513-569-7562 or Fax 513-569-8695.
2 Documents with a PB number are out of stock and
must be ordered by that number at cost from:
42
National Technical Information Service
5285 Port Royal Road
Springfield VA 22161
Telephone 703-487-4650 or 1-800-553-6847
3 Out of stock
-------
- R.E. Wright Environmental Inc. - In-Situ
Bioremediation System
Demonstration Bulletin (EPA/540/MR-95/525)
North American Technologies Group, Inc. - SFC
Oleofiltration System
Demonstration Bulletin (EPA/540/MR-94/525)'
Capsule (EPA/540/R-94/525a)
PB95-1672272
Innovative Tech. Eval. Kept. (EPA/540/R-94/525)
Ogden Environmental Services, Inc. (now General
Atomics) - Ogden Circulating Bed Combustor
Demonstration Bulletin (EPA/540/MR-92/001 )3
Technology Evaluation Rep. (EPA/540/R-92/001)
PB92-2272892
Peroxidation Systems, Inc. (now Calgon Carbon
Oxidation Technologies) - Perox-Pure Chemical
Oxidation
Demonstration Bulletin (EPA/540/MR-93/501)3
Applications Analysis (EPA/540/AR-93/501)
PB94-1303252
Technology Evaluation Rep. (EPA/540/R-93/501)
PB93-2135282 '
Technology Demo Summary (EPA/540/SR-93/501)3
Resources Conservation Company - The Basic
Extractive Sludge Treatment (B.E.S.T.) - Solvent
Extraction
Demonstration Bulletin (EPA/540/MR-92/079)3
Applications Analysis (EPA/540/AR-92/079)
Technology Evaluation -Vol. 1 (EPA/540/R-
92/079a) PB93-227122
Technology Evaluation Vol. 11, Part 1
(EPA/540/R-92/079b) PB93-2271302
Technology Evaluation Vol. 11, Part 2
(EPA/540/R-92/079c) PB93-2271482
Technology Evaluation Vol. 11, Part 3
(EPA/540/R-92/079d) PB93-2271552
Technology Demo Summary (EPA/540/SR-92/079)
Retech, Inc. - Plasma Centrifugal Furnace (Plasma
Arc Vitrification)
Demonstration Bulletin (EPA/540/M5-91/007)
Technology Evaluation -Vol. 1 (EPA/540/5-
91/007a) PB92-2160352
Technology Evaluation Vol. 11 (EPA/540/5-
91/007b) PB92-2160432
Applications Analysis (EPA/540/A5-91/007)
PB92-2187912
Technology Demo Summary (EPA/540/S5-91/007)
Risk Reduction Engineering Laboratory
- and IT Corporation - Debris Washing System
Technology Evaluation -Vol. 1 (EPA/540/5-91/006a)
PB91-2314562
Technology Evaluation Vol. 11 (EPA/540/5-91/006b)
PB91-2314642
Technology Demo Summary (EPA/540/S5-91/006?
- and University of Cincinnati-Hydraulic Fracturing of
Contaminated Soil
Demonstration Bulletin (EPA/540/MR-93/505)3
Technology Evaluation and Applications Analysis
Combined (EPA/540/R-93/505) PB94-1001612
Technology Demo Summary (EPA/540/SR-93/505)3
-and USDA-Forest Products Technology - Fungal
Treatment Technology
Demonstration Bulletin (EPA/540/MR-93/514)3
-Mobile Volume Reduction Unit at the Sand Creek
Superfund Site
Treatability Study Bulletin (EPA/540/MR-93/512)3
-Mobile Volume Reduction Unit at the Escambia
Superfund Site
Treatability Study Bulletin (EPA/540/MR-93/511 )3
-Volume Reduction Unit
Demonstration Bulletin (EPA/540/MR-93/508)
Applications Analysis (EPA/540/AR-93/508)
Technology Evaluation (EPA/540/R-93/508)3 .
PB94-1362642
Technology Demo Summary (EPA/540/SR-93/508)
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
-and IEG Technologies-Unterdruck-Verdampfer-
Brunner Technology (UVB) Vacuum Vaporizing Well
Demonstration Bulletin (EPA/540/MR-95/500)
Capsule (EPA/540/R-95/500a)
- Low Temperature Thermal Treatment (LT3) System
Demonstration Bulletin (EPA/540/MR-92/019)3
Applications Analysis (EPA/540/AR-92/019)
SBP Technologies, Inc. - Membrane Filtration and
Bioremediation
Demonstration Bulletin (EPA/540/MR-92/014)3
Applications Analysis (EPA/540/AR-92/014)
Silicate Technology Corporation (Now STC Omega) -
Solidification/Stabilization of Organic/Inorganic
Contaminants
Demonstration Bulletin (EPA/540/MR-92/010)3
Applications Analysis (EPA/540/AR-92/010)
PB93-1729482
1 Order documents free of charge by calling EPA's
Center for Environmental Research Information
(CERI) at 513-569-7562 or Fax 513-569-8695.
2 Documents with a PB number are out of stock and
must be ordered by that number at cost from:
43
National Technical Information Service
5285 Port Royal Road
Springfield VA 22161
Telephone 703-487-4650 or 1-800-553-6847
3 Out of stock
-------
Technology Evaluation (EPA/540/R-92/010)3
PB95-2557092
Technology Demo Summary (EPA/540/SR-92/010)3
Simplot, J.R. - Ex Situ Anaerobic Bioremediation
Technology: TNT
Demonstration Bulletin (EPA/540/MR-95/529)
Capsule (EPA/540/R-95/529a)
Innovative Tech. Eval. Report (EPA/540/R-95/529)
Simplot, J.R. - Ex-Situ Anaerobic Bioremediation
System (The SABRE Process)
Demonstration Bulletin (EPA/540/MR-94/508)
Capsule (EPA/540/R-94/508a)
Innovative Tech. Eval. Report (EPA/540/R-94/508)
Soiltech ATP Systems, Inc.
-Aostra-SoilTech Anaerobic Thermal Process
Demonstration Bulletin (EPA/540/MR-92/008)
-SoilTech Anaerobic Thermal Processor
Demonstration Bulletin (EPA/540/MR-92/078)
Soliditech, Inc. - Solidification and Stabilization
Technology Evaluation -Vol. 1 (EPA/540/5-
89/005a)ฅB90-1917502 v
Technology Evaluation Vol. 11 (EPA/540/5-
89/005b) PB90-1917682
Applications Analysis (EPA/540/A5-89/005)
PB91-1298172
Technology Demo Summary (EPA/540/S5-89/005)?
Demonstration Bulletin (EPA/540/M5-89/005)3
Sonotech, Inc. - Cello Pulse Combustion Burner
System
Demonstration Bulletin (EPA/540/MR-95/502)3
Capsule (EPA/540/R-95/502a) .
TcrraKleen Response Group, Inc. - Solvent
Extraction Treatment System
Demonstration Bulletin (EPA/540/MR-94/521 )3
Capsule (EPA/540/R-94/521 a)
PB95-2136172
Terra Vac, Inc. - In Situ Vacuum Extraction
Demonstration Bulletin (EPA/540/M5-89/003)3
Technology Evaluation -Vol. 1 (EPA/540/5-
89/003a) PB89-1920252
Technology Evaluation Vol. 11 (EPA/540/5-
89/003b) PB89-1920332
Applications Analysis (EPA/540/A5-89/003)
Technology Demo Summary (EPA/540/S5-89/003)3
Texaco, Inc. - Entrained-Bed Gasification Process
Demonstration Bulletin (EPA/540/MR-94/514)
Capsule (EPA/540/R-94/514a)
Innovative Tech. Eval. Report (EPA/540/R-94/514)
Thorneco, Inc. - Enzyme - Activated Cellulose
Technology
Treatability Study Bulletin (EPA/540/MR-92/01S)3
Toronto Harbour Commission - Soil Recycling
Treatment Train
Demonstration Bulletin (EPA/540/MR-92/015)
Applications Analysis (EPA/540/AR-93/517)
Technology Evaluation (EPA/540/R-93/517)3
PB93-2160672
Technology Demo Summary (EPA/540/SR-93/517)
Toxic Treatments USA, Inc. (Now NOVATERRA, Inc.)
- In-Situ Steam/Hot Air Stripping
Demonstration Bulletin (EPA/540/M5-90/003)
Applications Analysis (EPA/540/A5-90/008)
Ultrox, a Division of Zimpro Environmental, Inc. - UV
Ozone Treatment for Liquids
Demonstration Bulletin (EPA/540/M5-89/012)3
Applications Analysis (EPA/540/A5-89/012)
PB91-1297592
Technology Evaluation (EPA/540/5-89/012)
PB90-1981772
Technology Demo Summary (EPA/540/S5-89/012f
U.S. EPA - McColI Superfund Site - Demonstration of a
Trial Excavation
Technology Evaluation (EPA/540/R-92/015)
PB92-2264482
Applications Analysis (EPA/540/AR-92/015)
PB93-1001212
Technology Demo Summary (EPA/540/SR-92/015)
Wheelabrator Clean Air Systems, Inc. (formerly
Chemical Waste Management, Inc.) - PO*WW*ER
Technology
Demonstration Bulletin (EPA/540/MR-93/506)3
Applications Analysis (EPA/540/AR-93/506)
Technology Evaluation -Vol. 1 (EPA/540/R-93/506a)
PB94-1606372
Technology Evaluation Vol. 11 (EPA/540/R-93/506b)
PB94-1606602
Technology Demo Summary (EPA/540/SR-93/506)
Zenon Environmental, Inc. - Zenon Cross-
FlowPervaporation Technology
Demonstration Bulletin (EPA/540/MR-95/511)
Capsule (EPA/540/R-95/511 a)
Zenon Environmental Systems - Zenogem Wastewater
Treatment Process
Demonstration Bulletin (EPA/540/MR-95/503)3
Capsule (EPA/540/R-95/503a)3
' Order documents free of charge by calling EPA's
Center for Environmental Research Information
(CERI) at 513-569-7562 or Fax 513-569-8695.
'Documents with a PB number are out of stock and
must be ordered by that number at cost from:
44
National Technical Information Service
5285 Port Royal Road
Springfield VA 22161
Telephone 703-487-4650 or 1-800-553-6847
3 Out of stock
-------
Appendix C
Electronic Technical Information Resources
45
-------
Electronic Technical Information Resources
The following are EPA on-line bulletin boards or databases featuring information relating to
innovative technologies and other pertinent topics.
ATTIC: The Alternative Treatment Technology
Information Center (ATTIC) is a comprehensive
automated information retrieval system that
integrates existing hazardous waste data sources,
including the SITE Program, into a searchable
resource. This system provides access to a wide
variety of technical information on alternative
treatment technologies. The on-line access number
for ATTIC is 513-569- 7610. For technical support
call 513-569-7272. ATTIC is also accessible via
Telnet at cinbbs.cin.epa.gov and on the World
WideWebat\v\vw.epa.gov/ORD/ATTIC/attic.html.
BFSS Database: The Bioremediation in the Field
Search System (BFSS) is a PC-based software
application developed by the U.S. EPA's
Bioremediation Field Initiative. BFSS provides
access to a database of information on sites where
bioremediation is being tested, implemented, or
has already been completed. The database
currently contains information on over 500
bioremediation sites. For each site, the database
contains information on the site location, media
and contaminants being treated, andthe operation,
status, and costs of the treatment technology being
used. BFSS is available on ATTIC, CLU-IN, and
the ORD Bulletin Board System. The application
is also available on diskette (accompanied by a
user manual) from EPA/NRMRL Technology
TransferandSupportDivision. To order, call 513-
569-7562.
CLU-IN: The Clean-Up Information Bulletin
Board (CLU-IN) allows hazardous waste
professionals to communicate and exchange
information. CLU-IN also contains a variety of
information about site remediation that is
accessible in computer files or databases. CLU-IN
is accessible via the World Wide Web at http://
www.clu-in.com. The on-line access number for
CLU-IN is 301-589-8366. The system operator
can be reached at 301-589-8368.
NRMRL Treatability Database: The NRMRL
Treatability Database provides a thorough review of
the effectiveness of proven hazardous waste treatment
technologies in the removal and/or destruction of
chemicals in various media. The database contains
nearly 1,200 chemical compounds and over 9,200
sets oftreatability data. The database is available on
PC-compatible diskettes. To order, call Jerry
Waterman at 513-569-7834; fax to 513-569-7585;
or e-mail waterman.jerry@epamail.epa.gov.
ORD Electronic Bulletin Board System: The
ORD BBS features up-to-date technical
information accessible to personal computer users.
This BBS features a bibliographic database
containing abstracts of ORD publications and
peer-reviewed journal articles since 1977;
downloadable information sources including
databases, expert systems files, and bulletin files
and limited on-line ordering of available ORD
publications. The on-line access number for the
ORD BBS is 513-569-7610. For technical support
call 513-569-7272. The ORDBBS is accessible via
Telnet at cinbbs.cin.epa.gov and the World Wide
Web at www.epa.gov/ORD/dbases/ordbbs.html.
Vendor FACTS Database: The Vendor Field
Analytical and Characterization Technologies
System (Vendor FACTS) isadatabase ofinnovative
site characterization technologies and vendors.
Specifically, the database contains information
provided by vendors, suppliers, andmanufacturers
on the applicability, performance, and current use
of their products. Each technology is screened by
EPA for eligibility, applicability, and completeness.
46
-------
Version 2.0 contains analytical, geophysical,
chemical extraction, and sampling technologies
and includes approximately 128 technologies
provided by 92 vendors. Users are able to do
customized searches on such criteria as technology
type, media, contaminants, intended use (e.g.,
field screening and risk assessment), performance,
and cost data. Version 2.0 is downloadable from
http://www.prcemi.com/vfacts and http://
www.clu-in.com. The database is expected to be
available on PC-compatible diskettes and as a
downloadable file on EPA's CLU-IN Bulletin
Board System. For more information, contact the
Vendor FACTS help line at 800-245-4505 or 703-
287-8972.
VISITT: The Vendor Information System for In-
novative Treatment Technologies (VISITT Version
5.0) is a user-friendly disk-based system contain-
ing information on 346 innovative treatment tech-
nologies offered by 210 vendors. The database
contains detailed information on availability, per-
formance, and cost supplied to EPA by technol-
ogy companies and offers .customized search ca-
pabilities. The VISITT 5.0 database, user manual,
and Vendor Information Form (VIF) can be down-
loaded (free) on the World Wide Web from the VISITT
Home Page (http://www.prcemi.com/visitt); EPA's
Clean-Up Information (CLU-IN) Web Site (http://
www.clu-in.com); the Alternative Treatment Tech-
nologies Information Center (ATTIC) - 703-908-
2138; EPA Home Page (www.epa.gov); and America
Online (AOL). For instructions on downloadingfrom
these resources, contact the VISITT HELPLINE at
800-245-4505 or 703-287-8927.
VISITT 5.0 is also available on diskette (accom-
panied by a user manual). System requirements
include a 386 class (or higher) personal computer,
DOS Version 3.3 or higher, 640K RAM, and 10
megabytes of free hard disk space. To order, con-
tact: USEPA/NCEPI, P.O. Box42419, Cincinnati,
OH 45242-0419 or fax 513-489-8695.
ORD SITE Web Site Address: http://www.epa.gov/ORD/SITE. This web site provides
general information about the SITE Program to the waste remediation community. It
describes program highlights, project status, publications, a current solicitation and links
to other related web sites, both within and outside EPA. New documents are continually
loaded. This information is for federal and state personnel, consulting engineers, tech-
nology developers and vendors, remediation contractors, researchers, community groups,
and private citizens. Web site contact: William Frietsch, e-mail address:
frietsch. william @ epamail. epa. gov.
Technical Document Resources
Printed copies while in stock are available free of
charge and can be orderedfrom EPA's Center for
Environmental Research Information (CERI) by
phone: 513-569-7562 and fax: 513- 569-7566.
When documents are no longer available from
EPA, they can be ordered for a fee from the
National Technical Information Service: 703-
487-4650. Refer to document number or title
when placing orders.
Worldwide document distribution is provided via
ORD's Home Page on Internet and ORD's Electronic
Bulletin Board System (ORDBBS). Electronic
versions are downloadable at (accessible February 1997) and Telnet
at and via modem on the BBS,
513-569-7610 and 7700.
47
&U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE: 1998 -650-001/80170
-------
------- |