EPA541-R99-046
. 1999
-------
-------
21997
soscnsa
auras
-------
-------
MARINE CORPS BASE
CAMP PENDLETON, CALIFORNIA
RECORD OF DECISION
OPERABLE UNIT 3
FINAL
11 FEBRUARY 1999
-------
-------
Table of Contents.
List of Tables
List of Figures
List of Appendices
ListofAbbrevial
1.0 Declaration
List of Figures ............. .......... ......... " ]
• ••••• ..... •--••-••»...,, ..... ••....,.,.,.. xi
ces ....................
List of Abbreviations/Acronyms ...... .
1 . 1 Site Name and Location ...... .
1.2 Statement of Basis and Purpose ......
1.3 Assessment of Operable Unit 3 Sites ................ ....... ,
1.4 Description of the Selected Remedy ...... ............ ........ ,
1.4.1 Description of Selected Remedy for Sites 1 A, ID, IE, !F,and2A ......... 1.4
1.4.2 Description of Selected Remedy for Site 7 .................. ...... ,.5
1.4.3 Description of Selected Remedy for Sites IB 1C 11 2C 2D 2F
20, 10, 16, 17, 18, 27, 32, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38/39, 40,41, and 42 '.. ......... 1.5
1.5 Statutory Determinations for Sites 1 A, ID, IE, IF, 2A, and 7 ..... .......... j.6
1.6 Declaration Statement - No Action Necessary for Protection for Sites IB 1C ......
II, 2C, 2D, 2F, 2G, 10, 16, 17, 18, 27, 32, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, and 42 ... 1-6
2.0 Decision Summary ...............
2.1 Site Name, Location, and Description ..... ............... 2
2.2 Highlights of Community Participation ................. 2 i
2.3 Scope and Role of Operable Unit 3 .......................... 22
2.4 Remedial Action Selected for Sites 1 A, ID, IE, IF, and 2 A ................ . . 2-2
2.4.1 Site 1 - Refuse Burning Grounds ...... . ...... . 23
2.4.1.1 Site Name, Location, and Description - Sites 1 A, ID, IE, and IF ... 2-3
2.4.1.2 Site History and Enforcement Activities - Sites 1 A, ID, IE, and IF 2-4
2.4.1.3 Summary of Site Characteristics ........................... 2-4
2.4.1.3.1 Site 1A - Refuse Burning Ground in 14 Area .......... 2-5
2.4.1.3.2 Site ID - Refuse Burning Ground in 20 Area .......... 2-8
2.4.1.3.3 Site IE - Refuse Burning Ground in 32 Area .......... 2-10
2.4. 1.3.4 Site IF - Refuse Burning Ground in 43 Area .......... 2-13
2.4.1.4 Summary of Site Risks ...................... 2_]4
2.4.1.4.1 Site 1A - Refuse Burning Ground in 14 Area ......... 2-19
2.4. 1 .4.2 Site ID - Refuse Burning Ground in 20 Area ........ 2-24
SCl/l-98/WPC/Pendleto/RODI2l99.wpd j
-------
Table of Contents(Continued)-
2.4.1.4.3 Site IE - Reftise Burning Ground in 32 Area 2-26
2.4.1.4.4 Site IF - Refuse Burning Ground in 43 Area 2-28
2.4.2 Site 2A - Grease Disposal Pit in 14 Area 2-31
2.4.2.1 Site Name, Location, and Description 2-31
2.4.2.2 Site History and Enforcement Activities 2-32
2.4.2.3 Summary of Site Characteristics 2-32
2.4.2.3.1 Geology and Hydrogeology 2-33
2.4.2.3.2 Soil Results 2.33
2.4.2.4 Summary of Risks Associated with Site 2A 2-34
2,4.2.4.1 Human Health Risk Characterization 2-34
2.4.2.4.2 Ecological Risk Assessment 2-35
2.4.3 Description of Alternatives - Sites 1 A, ID, IE, IF, and 2A 2-37
2.4.3.1 Alternative 1: No Action 2-37
2.4.3.2 Alternative 2: Excavation/Removal and On-Base Disposal 2-38
2.4.3.3 Alternative 3: Excavation/Removal and Off-Base Disposal ... 2-39
2.4.4 Summary of Comparative Analysis of Alternatives - Sites 1A ID IE
!F,and2A ..'...' ' 2-39
2.4.4.1 Threshold Criteria 2-40
2.4.4.1.1 Overall Protection of Human Health and the
Environment 2-40
2.4.4.1.2 Compliance with ARARs 2-40
2.4.4.2 Primary Balancing Criteria 2-41
2.4.4.2.1 Long-Term Effectiveness and Permanence 2-41
2.4.4.2.2 Reduction of Toxicity, Mobility, and Volume
Through Treatment 2-41
2.4.4.2.3 Short-Term Effectiveness 2-4!
2.4.4.2.4 Implementability 2-42
2.4.4.2.5 Cost • 2-42
2.4.4.3 Modifying Criteria 2-43
2.4.4.3.1 State Acceptance 2-43
2.4.4.3.2 Community Acceptance 2-43
2.4.5 Selected Remedy for OU3 Sites 1 A, ID, IE, IF, and 2A 2-43
SC!/t-98/WPC/Pcndleto/ROD12l99.wpd H
-------
Table of Contents(Continued).
2.4.6 Statutory Determinations 2-46
2.4.6.1 Protection of Human Health and the Environment 2-47
2.4.6.2 Compliance with Applicable or Relevant and Appropriate
Requirements 2-47
2.4.6.3 Cost-Effectiveness 2-47
2.4.6.4 Use of Permanent Solutions and Alternative Treatment
Technologies to the Extent Practicable 2-47
2.5 Remedial Action Selected for Site 7 - Box Canyon Landfill 2-48
2.5.1 Site Name, Location, and Description - Site 7 2-48
2.5.2 Site History and Enforcement Activities 2-49
2.5.3 Summary of Site Characteristics 2-49
2.5.3.1 Geology and Hydrogeology 2-50
2.5.3.2 Soil Results 2-53
2.5.3.3 Groundwater Results , 2-53
2.5.3.4 Ambient Air and Soil Gas Results 2-55
2.5.4 Summary of Site Risks - Site 7 2-56
2.5.4.1 Human Health Risk Characterization 2-56
2.5.4.2 Ecological Risk Assessment 2-57
2.5.5 Description of Alternatives - Site 7 . 2-57
2.5.6 Summary of Comparative Analysis of Alternatives - Site 7 2-58
2.5.6.1 Overall Protection of Human Health and the Environment and
Compliance with ARARs 2-58
2.5.6.2 Long-Term Effectiveness and Permanence 2-58
2.5.6.3 Reduction of Toxicity, Mobility, and Volume Through Treatment 2-59
2.5.6.4 Short-Term Effectiveness 2-59
2.5.6.5 Implementability 2-59
2.5.6.6 Cost 2-59
2.5.6.7 State Acceptance 2-60
2.5.6.8 Community Acceptance 2-60
2.5.7 Selected Remedy for Site 7 2-60
2.5.8 Statutory Determinations 2-63
2.5.8.1 Protection of Human Health and the Environment 2-63
SCI/l-9g/WPC/Pemlleto/RODI2l99.wpd III
-------
Table ofContents(Continued).
2.5.8.2 Compliance with Applicable or Relevant and Appropriate
Requirements 2-63
2.5.8.3 Cost-Effectiveness 2-63
2.5.8.4 Use of Permanent Solutions and Alternative Treatment
Technologies to the Extent Practicable '. 2-64
2.6 No Action Selected for Sites IB, 1C, 1G, II, 2C, 2D, 2F, 2G, 10, 16, 17,
18, 27,32. 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39,40, 41, and 42 2-64
2.6.1 Site 1B - Refuse Burning Ground in 11 Area 2-65
2.6.1.1 Site Name, Location, and Description 2-65
2.6.1.2 Site History and Enforcement Activities 2-65
2.6.1.3, Summary ol Site Characteristics 2-65
2.6.1.3.1 Geology and Hydrogeology 2-66
2.6.1.3.2 Soil Results 2-66
2.6.1.4 Summary of Risks Associated with Site IB 2-66
2.6.1.4.1 Human Health Risk Characterization 2-67
2.6.1.4.2 Ecological Risk Assessment 2-67
2.6.1.5 Description of the No Action Alternative 2-68
2.6.2 Site 1C - Refuse Burning Ground in 13 Area 2-68
2.6.2.1 Site Name, Location, and Description 2-68
2.6.2.2 Site History and Enforcement Activities 2-69
2.6.2.3 Summary of Site Characteristics 2-69
2.6.2.3.1 Geology and Hydrogeology 2-70
2.6.2.3.2 Soil Results 2-70
2.6.2.4 Summary of Risks Associated with Site 1C 2-71
2.6.2.4.1 Human Health Risk Characterization 2-71
2.6.2.4.2 Ecological Risk Assessment 2-72
2.6.2.5 Description of the No Action Alternative 2-72
2.6.3 Site II - Refuse Burning Ground in 63 Area 2-72
2.6.3.1 Site Name, Location, and Description 2-72
2.6.3.2 Site History and Enforcement Activities .•„..." 2-73
2.6.3.3 Summary of Site Characteristics 2-74
SCl/l .98flVPCVPcndleio/ROD12l 99.wpd IV
-------
Table of Contents(Continued).
2.6.3.3.1 Geology and Hydrogeology 2-74
2.6.3.3.2 Soil Results 2-74
2.6.3.4 Summary of Risks Associated with Site 11 2-75
2.6.3.4.1 Human Health Risk Characterization 2-75
2.6.3.4.2 Ecological Risk Assessment 2-76
2.6.3.5 Description of the No Action Alternative 2-76
2.6.4 Site 2C - Grease Disposal Pit in 33 Area 2-77
2.6.4.1 Site Name, Location, and Description 2-77
2.6.4.2 Site History and Enforcement Activities 2-78
; 2.6.4.3 Summary of Site Characteristics 2-78
2.6.4.3.1 Geology and Hydrogeology 2-78
2.6.4.3.2 Soil Results 2-79
2.6.4.4 Summary of Risks Associated with Site 2C 2-81
2.6.4.4.1 Human Health Risk Characterization 2-81
2.6.4.4.2 Ecological Risk Assessment 2-82
2.6.4.5 Description of the No Action Alternative 2-83
2.6.5 Site 2D - Grease Disposal Pit in 43 Area 2-83
2.6.5.1 Site Name, Location, and Description 2-83
2.6.5.2 Site History and Enforcement Activities 2-84
2.6.5.3 Summary of Site Characteristics 2-84
2.6.5.3.1 Geology and Hydrogeology 2-84
2.6.5.3.2 Soil Results 2-85
2.6.5.3.3 Groundwater Results 2-85
2.6.5.3.4 Ecological Results 2-85
2.6.5.3.5 Summary 2-86
2.6.5.4 Summary of Risks Associated with Site 2D 2-86
2.6.5.4.1 Human Health Risk Characterization 2-86
2.6.5.4.2 Ecological Risk Assessment 2-88
2.6.5.5 Description of the No Action Alternative 2-88
2.6.6. Site 2F - Grease Disposal Pit in 62 Area 2-89
2.6.6.1 Site Name, Location, and Description 2-89
SCI/l-98AVPC/Pendleto/RODI2l99.wpiI V
-------
Table of Contents(Continued)-
2.6.6.2 Site History and Enforcement Activities 2-90
2.6.6.3 Summary of Site Characteristics 2-90
2.6.6.3.1 Geology and Hydrogeology 2-90
2.6.6.3.2 Soil Results 2-91
2.6.6.4 Summary of Risks Associated with Site 2F 2-92
2.6.6.4.1 Human Health Risk Characterization 2-92
2.6.6.4.2 Ecological Risk Assessment 2-93
2,6.6.5 Description of the No Action Alternative 2-94
2.6.7 Site 2G - Grease Disposal Pit in 31 Area 2-94
2.6.7.1 Site Name, Location, and Description 2-94
2.6.7.2 Site History and Enforcement Activities 2-95
2.6.7.3 Summary of Site Characteristics 2-95
2.6.7.3.1 Geology and Hydrogeology 2-95
2.6.7.3.2 Soil Results 2-96
2.6.7.3.3 Groundwater Results 2-96
2.6.7.3.4 Summary 2-96
2.6.7.4 Summary of Risks Associated with Site 2G 2-96
2.6.7A.I Human Health Risk Characterization 2-97
2.6.7.4.2 Ecological Risk Assessment 2-97
2.6.7.5 Description of the No Action Alternative 2-98
2.6.8 Site 10-26 Area Sewage Sludge Composting Yard 2-99
2.6.8.1 Site Name, Location, and Description 2-99
2.6.8.2 Site History and Enforcement Activities 2-100
2.6.8.3 Summary of Site Characteristics 2-100
2.6.8.3.1 Geology and Hydrogeology 2-101
2.6.8.3.2 Soil Results 2-102
2.6.8.3.3 Groundwater Results 2-103
2.6.8.3.4 Biota Results 2-104
2.6.8.3.5 Summary 2-104
2.6.8.4 Summary of Risks Associated with Site 10 2-104
2.6.8.4.1 Human Health Risk Characterization 2-104
SCI/l-98/WPC/Pcndlelo/ROD12l99.wpd VJ
-------
Table of Contents(Continued).
2.6.8.4.2 Ecological Risk Assessment ................... 2-106
2.6.8.5 Description of the No Action Alternative ................... 2-107
2.6.9 Site 16-22 Area Buildings 22151 and 22187 Ditch Confluence and
Ditch ............ ...................................... ...... 2-108
2.6.9. 1 Site Name, Location, and Description ..................... 2-108
2.6.9.2 Site History and Enforcement Activities ............... .... 2-109
2.6.9.3 Summary of Site Characteristics ......................... 2-110
2.6.9.3.1 Geology and Hydrogeology .................... 2-110
2.6.9.3.2 Soil Results .......... ............. ......... 2-l 11
2.6.9.3.3 Groundwater Results .... ..................... 2-113
2.6.9.3.4 Surface- Water and Sediment Results ............. 2-113
2.6.9.3.5 Biota Results ........ . . ..................... 2-113
2.6.9.4 Summary of Risks Associated with Site 16 ................. 2-1 14
2.6.9.4. 1 Human Health Risk Characterization ............ 2-114
2.6.9.4.2 Ecological Risk Assessment .......... ......... 2-115
2.6.9.5 Description of the No Action Alternative . . ................ 2-118
2.6.10 Site 17 -22 Area Building 22 187 Marsh and Ditch .......... 2-118
2.6.10.1 Site Name, Location, and Description ..................... 2-118
2.6. 1 0.2 Site History and Enforcement Activities ................... 2-119
2.6. 10.3 Summary of Site Characteristics ......................... 2-120
2.6, 10.3.1 Geology and Hydrogeology ................. 2-120
2.6.10.3.2 Surface- Water and Sediment Results .......... 2-121
2.6.10.4 Summary of Risks Associated with Site 17 ............... 2-121
2.6.10.5 Description of the No Action Alternative ... .............. 2-123
2.6.1 1 Site 18 - 13/16 Area Building 1687 Spill and Ditch ........ ....... 2-123
2.6.1 1.1 Site Name, Location, and Description ................... 2-123
2.6. 1 1.2 Site History and Enforcement Activities ................. 2-124
2.6.1 1.3 Summary of Site Characteristics ......................... 2-124
2.6.11.3.1 Geology and Hydrogeology .... ............. 2-124
2.6.1 1.3.2 Soil Results ........................ ...... 2-125
2.6.11.4 Summary of Risks Associated with Site 18 . ............. .. 2-125
2.6. 1 1 .4. 1 Human Health Risk Characterization .......... 2-126
SCI/l-98/WPC/Pendlclo/RODI2l99wpd
-------
Table of Contents(Continued).
2.6.11.4.2 Ecological Risk Assessment 2-127
2.6.11.5 Description of the No Action Alternative 2-127
2.6.12 Site 27 -22 Area Ditches Behind Building 22210 2-i28
2.6.12.1 Site Name, Location, and Description 2-128
2.6.12.2 Site History and Enforcement Activities 9-129
2.6.12.3 Summary of Site Characteristics 2_I29
2.6.12.3.1 Geology and Hydrogeology 2-130
2.6.12.3.2 Surface-Water and Sediment Results 2-130
2.6.12.3.3 BiotaResults 2_m
2.6.12,4 Summary of Risks Associated with Site 27 2-131
2.6.12.4.1 Human Health Risk Characterization 2-131
2.6.12.4.2 Ecological Risk Assessment 2-I3l
2.6.12.5 Description of the No Action Alternative 2-133
2.6.13 Site 32 - Drum Storage Area and Drainage Between Buildings 41303
and 41366
* • «&"!J3
2.6.13.1 Site Name, Location, and Description 2-133
2.6.13.2 Site History and Enforcement Activities 2-134
2.6.13.3 Summary of Site Characteristics 2-\35
2.6.13.3.1 Geology and Hydrogeology 2-135
2.6.13.3.2 Soil Results 2_136
2.6.13.3.3 Groundwater Results 2-136
2.6.13.3.4 Summary 2-136
2.6.13.4 Summary of Risks Associated with Site 32 2-137
2.6.13.4.1 Human Health Risk Characterization 2-137
2.6.13.4.2 Ecological Risk Assessment 2-138
2.6.13.5 Description of the No Action Alternative 2-139
2.6.14 Site 34 - Combat Engineers Maintenance Facility, Buildings 62580-
,62583 ••• • 2-139
2.6.14.1 Site Name, Location, and Description 2-139
2.6.14.2 Site History and Enforcement Activities 2-140
2.6.14.3 Summary of Site Characteristics '. 2-141
2.6.14.3.1 Geology and Hydrogeology 2-141
SCI/l-9S/WPC/Pcndlelo/RODI2199.wpd viii
-------
Table of Contents(Continued).
2.6.14.3.2 Soil Results .............................. 2-141
2.6.14.3.3 Groiindwater Results ... .................... 2-142
2.6. 14.3.4 Summary ................................ 2-142
2.6.14.4 Summary of Risks Associated with Site 34 ............... 2-143
2.6.14.4.1 Human Health Risk Characterization .......... 2-143
2.6.14.4.2 Ecological Risk Assessment ................. 2-145
2.6.14.5 Description of the No Action Alternative ...... ........... 2-146
2.6.15 Site 35 - Former Sewage Treatment Plant Facility in 25 Area ........ 2-146
2.6.1 5.1 Site Name, Location, and Description .... ..... . . . ....... 2-146
2.6.15.2 Site History and Enforcement Activities ................. 2-147
2.6.15.3 Summary of Site Characteristics ..................... ... 2-148
2.6.15.3.1 Geology and Hydrogeology ................. 2-148
2.6.15.3.2 Soil Results ................... ........... 2-149
2.6.15.3.3 Groundwater Results ....................... 2-150
2.6.15.4 Summary of Risks Associated with Site 35 ............ ... 2-15 1
2.6.15.4.1 Human Health Risk Characterization ...... .... 2-151
2.6.15.4.2 Ecological Risk Assessment ................. 2-151
2.6.15.5 Description of the No Action Alternative ................. 2-152
2.6. 1 6 Site 36 - Debris Pile Area Behind Ponds at Sewage Treatment Plant 11 2-153
2.6.16.1 Site Name, Location, and Description ................... 2-153
2.6.16.2 Site History, Enforcement Activities, and Site Characteristics 2-153
2.6. 16.3 Summary of Risks Associated with Site 36 ............... 2-1 54
2.6.16.4 Description of the No Action Alternative ................. 2-154
2.6.17 Site 37 - Pesticide- and POL-Handling Areas at San Clemente Ranch . . 2-154
2.6. 17. 1 Site Name, Location, and Description ................... 2-1 54
2.6.17.2 Site History and Enforcement Activities ................. 2-155
2.6.17.3 Summary of Site Characteristics ........................ 2-156
2.6.17.3.1 Geology and Hydrogeology ................. 2-156
2.6.17.3.2 Soil Results ........................ . ..... 2-156
2.6.17.3.3 Groundwater Results ............... . ..... . . 2-157
2.6.17.3.4 Summary ................................ 2-158
SCI/l-98/WPCVPendlcto/ROD12l99.wpd
-------
Table of Contents(Continued).
2.6.17.4 Summary of Risks Associated with Site 37 2-158
2.6.17.4.1 Human Health Risk Characterization 2-158
2.6.17.4.2 Ecological Risk Assessment 2-160
2.6.17.5 Description of the No Action Alternative 2-160
2.6.18 Sites 38, 39, 41, and 42 . 2-161
2.6.18.1 Site Name, Location, Description, and History 2-161
2.6.18.2 Summary of Site Characteristics 2-162
2.6.18.3 Summary of Risks Associated with Sites 38, 39, 41, and 42 .. 2-162
2.6.18.4 Description of the No Action Alternative 2-163
2.6.19 Site 40-13 Area Sewer Line, Building 13103 2-163
2.6.19.1 Site Name, Location, and Description 2-163
2.6.19.2 Site History and Enforcement Activities 2-164
2.6.19.3 Summary of Site Characteristics 2-165
2.6.19J.1 Geology and Hydrogeology 2-165
2.6.19.3.2 Analytical Results 2-165
2.6.19.4 Summary of Risks Associated with Site 40 2-165
2.6.19.4.1 Human Health Risk Characterization 2-166
. 2.6.19.4.2 Ecological Risk Assessment 2-166
2.6.19.5 Description of the No Action Alternative 2-167
3.0 Responsiveness Summary 3.1
4.0 References 4. j
SCI/1 -98/WPC/Pendleto/ROD 12199.wpd
-------
List of Tables.
Table
2-1
Title
Remedial Action Goals for Soil at Sites 1 A, ID, IE, IF, and 2A
List of Figures.
figure
Tttla
l-l
1-2
2-1
2-2
2-3
2-4
2-5
2-6
2-7
2-8
2-9
2-10
2-11
2-12
2-13
Location Map
Locations of Base Areas and Operable Unit 3 Sites
Site 1A - Refuse Burning Ground in 14 Area, Summary of Soil and
Groundwater Analytical Results
Site ID - Refuse Burning Ground in 20 Area, Summary of Soil and
Groundwater Analytical Results
Site IE - Refuse Burning Ground in 32 Area, Summary of Soil
Analytical Results
Site IF- Refuse Burning Ground in 43 Area, Summary of Soil and
Groundwater Analytical Results
Site 2A - Grease Disposal Pit in 14 Area, Summary of Soil Analytical
Results
Site 1A - Refuse Burning Ground in 14 Area, Excavation Area
Site ID - Refuse Burning Ground in 20 Area, Excavation Area
Site IE - Refuse Burning Ground in 20 Area, Excavation Area
Site IF - Refuse Burning Ground in 43 Area, Excavation Area
Site 2A - Grease Disposal Pit in 14 Area, Excavation Area
Site 7 - Box Canyon Landfill Soil and Groundwater Sample Locations
and Summary of Groundwater Analytical Results
Site 7 - Evapotranspiration Cover System Profile
Site IB - Refuse Burning Ground in 11 Area, Summary of Soil
Analytical Results
SCI/10-98AVPOFendleuVROD]0-27.wpd
XI
-------
List of Figures (Continued).
2'14 Site 1C - Refuse Burning Ground in 13 Area, Summary of Soil
Analytical Results
2"15 Site II - Refuse Burning Ground in 63 Area, Summary of Soil
Analytical Results
2"16 Site 2C - Grease Disposal Pit in 33 Area, Summary of Soil Analytical
Results
2'17 Site 2D- Grease Disposal Pit in 43 Area, Summary of Soil and
Groundwater Analytical Results
2'18 Site 2F - Grease Disposal Pit in 62 Area, Summary of Soil Analytical
Results
2-19 Site 2G- Grease Disposal Pit in 31 Area, Summary of Soil and
Groundwater Analytical Results
2"20 Site 10 - 26 Area Sewage Sludge Composting Yard, Summary of Soil
and Groundwater Analytical Results for Human Health
2'21 Site 10 - 26 Area Sewage Sludge Composting Yard, Summary of Soil
Analytical Results with Ecological Hazard Quotients a 1.0
2-22 Site 16-22 Area Buildings 22151 and 22187 Ditch Confluence and
Ditch, Summary of Soil Analytical Results for Human Health
2'23 Site 16 - 22 Area Buildings 22151 and 22187 Ditch Confluence and
Ditch, Summary of Soil. Sediment, and Surface-Water Analytical
Results with Ecological Hazard Quotients a 1.0
2'24 Site 17 - 22 Area Building 22187 Marsh and Ditch, Summary of
Surface-Water and Sediment Analytical Results with Ecological
Hazard Quotients il.O
2-25 Site 18 - 13/16 Area Building 1687 Spill and Ditch, Summary of
Soil Analytical Results
2-26 Site 27-22 Area Ditches Behind Building 22210, Summary of
Surface-Water and Sediment Analytical Results with Ecological
Hazard Quotients 21.0
2'27 Site 32 - Drum Storage Area and Drainage Between Buildings 41303
and 41366, Summary of Soil and Groundwater Analytical Results
2-28 Site 34 - Combat Engineers Maintenance Facility, Building 62580-
62583, Summary of Soil and Groundwater Analytical Results
SCI/10-9«AVPOPaidVa
-------
List of Figures (Continued).
2"29 Site 34 - Combat Engineers Maintenance Facility, Buildings 62580-
62583, Summary of Soil Analytical Results with Hazard Quotients * 1.0
2~30 s»te 35 -Former Sewage Treatment Plant Facility in 25 Area,
Summary of Soil and Groundwater Analytical Results
2~31 Site 36 - Debris Pile Area Behind Ponds at Sewage Treatment Plant 11,
Summary of Soil Analytical Results
2"32 Site 37-Pesticide-and POL-Handling Areas at San Clemente Ranch,
Summary of Soil and Groundwater Analytical Results
2"33 Site 38 - 52 Area Sewer Line, Building 52188, Summary of Soil
Analytical Results
2'34 Site 3$ - 41 Area Sewer Line, Buildings 41300 and 41346, Summary of
Soil Analytical Results
2"35 Sites 41 and 42 - 13 Area Sewer Lines, Summary of Soil Analytical
Results
2"36 Site 40 -13 Area Sewer Line, Building 13103, Summary of Soil
Analytical Results
List of Appendices.
Appendix A Transcript of the Public Meeting
Appendix B Applicable or Relevant and Appropriate Requirements
Appendix C Administrative Record Index
.SCVIO-9&WPOPeodteomOD10-27.wpd
-------
(intentionally blank)
SCIUO-9&nVFC/PndfctaKOD10-27.wpd
-------
List of Abbreviations/Acronyms.
APCD
AC/S.ES
ARAR
AWQC
Cal/EPA
Cal/OSHA
CAMU
CERCLA
CFR
coc
COEC
COPC
COPEC
GRDL
DCA
DCE
DDD
DDE
DDT
DIWET
DLM
DTSC
EcoRA
EE/CA
EPA
FFA
FID
FS
HEAST
Air Pollution Control District
Assistant Chief of Staff, Environmental Security
Applicable or Relevant and Appropriate Requirement
Aquatic Water-Quality Criteria
California Environmental Protection Agency
California Occupational Safety and Health Administration
Corrective Action Management Unit
Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation
and Liability Act of 1980
Code of Federal Regulations
Chemical of Concern
Chemical of Ecological Concern
Chemical of Potential Concern
Chemical of Potential Ecological Concern
Contract Required Detection Limit
Dichloroethane
Dichloroethene
Dichlorodiphenyldichloroethene
Dichlorodiphenylethene
Dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethene
Deionized Water Waste Extraction Test
Designated Level Methodology
Department of Toxic Substances Control
Ecological Risk Assessment
Engineering Evaluation/Cost Analysis
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Federal Facility Agreement
Flame-Ionization Detector
Feasibility Study
Health Effects Assessment Summary Tables
SClrtO-98/WPOPeo
-------
List of Abbreviations/Acronyms (ContinuedL
HHRA
HI
HpCDD
HpCDF
HQ
HxCDD
IAS
IDL
ILCR
IRIS
IRP
Jacobs
LUFT
MCAS
MCB
MCL
MCTSSA
mg/dl
mg/kg
mg/kg-day
mg/1
msl
NCP
NEESA
NOAEL
NPL
OU
Human Health Risk Assessment
Hazard Index
Heptachlorodibenzo-p-dioxins
Heptacfalorodibenzofuran
Hazard Quotient
Hexachlorodibenzo-p-dioxins
Initial Assessment Study
Instrument Detection Limit
Incremental Lifetime Cancer Risk
Integrated Risk Information System
Installation Restoration Program
Jacobs Engineering Group Inc.
Leaking Underground Fuel Tank
Marine Corps Air Station
Marine Corps Base
Maximum Contaminant Level (Federal or State)
Marine Corps Tactical System Support Activity
Milligrams per Deciliter
Milligrams per Kilogram
Milligrams per Kilogram per Day
Milligrams per Liter
Mean Sea Level
National Oil and Hazardous Substances Pollution Contingency Plan
Naval Energy and Environmental Support Activity (currently NFESC)
No Observed Adverse Effect Level
National Priorities List
Operable Unit
SCI/lO-9SAVPCVPiaidl«iVROD10-27.wpd
XVI
-------
List of Abbreviations/Acronyms (Cohtinued)-
PAH
PCB
PCE
PCP
PLE
POL
PPE
ppm
PR
PRO
RAGS
RAO
RCRA
RFA
RfD
RI
RI/FS
RME
ROD
RWQCB
SARA
SCS
SF
SPLP
SV
SVOC
SWDIV
SWRCB
Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons
Polychlorinated Biphenyl
Tetrachloroethene
Pentachlorophenol
Preliminary Limit of Exposure
Petroleum, Oil, and Lubricants
Personal Protective Equipment
Parts per Million
Preliminary Review
Preliminary Remediation Goal
Remedial Action Guidance for Superfund
Remedial Action Objective
Resource Conservation and Recovery Act
RCRA Facility Assessment
Reference Dose
Remedial Investigation
Remedial Investigation/Feasibility Study
Reasonable Maximum Exposure
Record of Decision
California Regional Water Quality Control Board
Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization Act of 1986
Soil Conservation Service
Slope Factor
Synthetic Precipitation Leaching Procedure
Sampling Visit
Semivolatile Organic Compound
Southwest Division Naval Facilities Engineering Command
California State Water Resources Control Board
SCI/10-98AVPOPcodlettVROD10-27.wpd
xvu
-------
List of Abbreviations/Acronyms (ContinuedL
TAL Target Analyte List
TCA Trichloroethane
TCE Trichloroetbene
TCLP Total Concentration Leaching Procedure
T**11 Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons
Tss Total Suspended Solids
TVH Total Volatile Hydrocarbons
UCL Upper Confidence Limit
UST Underground Storage Tank
Voc Volatile Organic Compound
Micrograms per Kilogram :
Micrograms per Liter
SetfI
-------
1.0 Declaration
This Record of Decision (ROD) addresses 28 sites that constitute Operable Unit (OU) 3 at
Marine Corps Base (MCB) Camp Pendleton, California.
1.1 Site Name and Location
MCB Camp Pendleton is located along the Pacific coast, about halfway between Los Angeles
and San Diego (Figure 1-1). The vast majority of the base is within San Diego County, and a
smal I portion of the northwest corner of the base is in Orange County.
Installation Restoration Program (IRP) sites at MCB Camp Pendleton were assigned to one of
four groups (A, B, C, and D) during the investigation phase according to potential impact to
human health and the environment. Group A sites were believed to have the highest potential for
such impact; Group D sites have the lowest. OU3 includes the following sites from Groups B, C,
and D:
• Group B: Site 7 soil and groundwater
Group C: Sites ID, IE, 2A, 10, and 35 soil and groundwater; Sites 16 and 27 soil;
and Site 17 sediment and surface water
Group D: Sites 1A, IB, 1C, IF, II, 2C, 2D, 2F, 2G, 18, 32, 34, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41,
and 42 soil and groundwater.
The base is divided into 35 major area designations for location of base activities. The OU3 sites
are located in various areas throughout the base, as shown in Figure 1-2. The OU3 site names
are as follows:
Site 1A - Refuse Burning Ground in 14 Area
• Site 1B - Refuse Burning Ground in 11 Area
• Site 1C - Refuse Burning Ground in 13 Area
Site 1D - Refuse Burning Ground in 20 Area
Site IE - Refuse Burning Ground in 32 Area
SCI/!-98/WPC/Pendleto/RODl2!99.wpd 1-1
-------
SJte !f "i! T***1*™** Gro"nd in 43 Area
S te ii" ^ Buming °rOUnd in 63 A
Jite 2A - Grease Disposal Pit in 14 Area
Site 2C - Grease Disposal Pit in 33 Area
St w ~^reaSe DiSp°SaI Plt in 43 Area
c 2F - Grease Disposal Pit in 62 Area
bite 20 - Grease Disposal Pit in 3 1 Area
Jsite 7 - Box Canyon Landfill
Site !2 " w ^ nCWage SIudge Composting Yard
ss-.s'-— -»-
S e 40 ' n A^ f^ rUne' Bul!di"gS 4I30° ^ 41346
Se4?"nf ea?ewerLlne' Building 13103
Site £ " n f 6a ? 6Wer Line' Buildi"g 13 12§
^ite 42 - 1 3 Area Sewer Line, Building 13129.
.0 2E
from the Comprehend Enviro^enta, Respon., Compensation, ^ Liabuhy ^
(CERCLA) process. Therefore, Site ,G was also removed from the CERCLA „ „
Area Skee, Range, ls . actlve facilitv ^ n<> ^ ^
been excluded from CERCLA in an amend™, » to FFA (EPA ,„,
forpublic comment Si,e ,H. Wfc. Burning Ground in 62 Area and Si«e 30 - Firing
SCI/l-98/WPC/Pendlcto/ROD!2 !99.wpd 1 _2
-------
Range Soil Fill in 31 Area have been moved to OU4 in order to ftirther address site-specific
technical issues.
1.2 Statement of Basis and Purpose
This decision document presents the selected remedial actions for Sites I A, 1D, 1E, 1F, 2A.
and 7. In addition, this document sets forth the basis for the no action decisions for Sites IB. 1C,
II, 2C, 2D,2F,2G, 10, 16, 17, 18,27, 32, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39.40,41, and 42. The actions
selected for these sites were chosen in accordance with CERCLA 1980, as amended by the
Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization Act (SARA) of 1986, and to the extent practicable,
the National Oil and Hazardous Substances Pollution Contingency Plan (NCP).
The decisions for these sites are based on the information contained in the administrative record
file for MCB Camp Pendleton. The primary documents used for the basis of the decisions are
the remedial investigation (RI) report for Group C sites (1 November 1996), the RI for Group D
sites (16 July 1997), and the RI and feasibility study (FS) report for OU3 (12 December 1997).
The U.S. Marine Corps, the EPA, the Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC) and the
San Diego Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB) of the California Environmental
Protection Agency (Cal/EPA) concur with the selected remedy for each OU3 site.
1.3 Assessment of Operable Unit 3 Sites
In accordance with the EPA's Interim Final Guidance on Preparing Superfund Decision
Documents (EPA, 1989a), this assessment section applies only to Sites 1 A, ID, IE, IF, 2A, and
7 and not to the sites in this ROD requiring no further action.
If Sites 1 A, ID, IE, IF, 2A, and 7 are not addressed by implementing the response actions
selected in this ROD, actual or threatened releases of hazardous substances from these sites could
present current or potential future threats lo the public health, welfare, or the environment.
SCl/l -98/WPC/Pcndleto/ROD 12199 wpd
1-3
-------
1.4 Description of the Selected Remedy
RI sites at MCB Camp Pendleton were separated into four groups (Groups A, B, C, and D) for
investigation based on potential impact to human health and the environment. As investigations
were completed, sites were grouped into OUs for selection of cleanup alternatives. The ROD for
OU1 was signed in December 1995 and addresses the selected remedies for soil and groundwater
at Site 9, soil at Site 4/4A, and soil and groundwater at Site 24, all of which are Group A Sites.
The ROD for OU2 was signed in September 1997 and includes 13 Group A, Group B, and
Group C sites. These sites include Sites 2B and 31 soil; Sites 28 and 43 groundwater; Site 3 soil,
sediment, and surface water; Site 5 soil and groundwater; Sites 19,20, and 22 soil, sediment,
groundwater, and surface water; Sites 8A and 44 sediment and surface water; and Sites 6 and 45
soil, sediment, and surface water.
This ROD addresses the remedies for OU3, which includes sites from Groups B, G, and D, as
listed in Section 1.1. Descriptions of the selected remedies for OU3 sites are presented in the
following sections.
1.4.1 Description of Selected Remedy for Sites 1A, 1D, 1E, 1F, and 2A
The same remedy, excavation and on-base disposal, was selected for Sites 1 A, ID, IE, IF,
and 2A. The major components of the selected remedy are as follows:
Excavation of contaminated soils; for ecological concerns the maximum excavation
depth is 5 feet and for human health concerns the maximum excavation depth is
10 feet.
Confirmation sampling on bottom and side walls of excavation in accordance with
• EPA guidance Methods for Evaluating the Attainment of Cleanup Standards,
Volume I: Soils and Media, PB89-234959.
Transportation to and disposal of soil that meets the technical and legal requirements
(i.e., specified in 40 CFR 264.552[c]) at an on-base landfill, IR Site 7 - Box Canyon
Landfill, a designated CAMU
SCI/l-98/WPOPendIelo/RODI2l99.wpd 1-4
-------
Backfilling of the excavation with clean soil upon confirmation that cleanup goals
have been met; if goals have not been met at the maximum excavation depths, i.e.,
5 feet for ecological concerns and 10 feet for human health concerns, 5 or 10 feet of
clean fill will be placed as relevant.
• Site regrading and revegetating.
The low-level threats posed by the contaminants at the sites specified are addressed by removing
the contaminated soils and/or eliminating the exposure pathway.
1.4.2 Description of Selected Remedy for Site 7
An evapotranspiration (ET) cover was selected as the final remedy for the Site 7 landfill closure.
The major components of the selected remedy are as follows:
Installation of an ET cover consisting of a vegetated topsoil layer, a minimally
compacted soil layer, and a compacted low-permeability bottom layer.
Installation of lined ditches between the landfill benches on the north face of the
landfill.
• Long-term monitoring.
• Land use restrictions.
The low-level threats posed by the contaminants at Site 7 are addressed through containment of
the wastes, elimination of exposure pathways, and continued monitoring and maintenance.
1.4.3 Description of Selected Action for Sites 1B, 1C, 11, 2C, 2D, 2F, 2G 10
10, 16, 17, 18, 27, 32, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, and 42
No action was selected for soil and groundwater at Sites IB, 1C, II, 2C, 2D, 2F, 2G, 10, 18, 32,
34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, and 42. No action was also selected for soil, sediment, and surface
water at Site 16 and for sediment and surface water at Sites 17 and 27.
SCI/I -98/WPC/Pendleto/RODl 2199,wpd 1 -5
-------
f.5 Statutory Oetemrfnaffo™ for S«es 1A, ID, 1E, 1F, M, 3m/ 7
The remed.es seiected for Sites 1A, ID, ,E, IF, 2A, and 7 use permanent solutions
n_ extent practicable. Theremedy for Sites ,A, ID, IE, ,F, ^ M wi,,
hazardous substance reining on site because con^inated soil wili be removed
5-year rev.ews are required. A, Site 7, iandfii.ed wastes remain in p,ace and 5-yea,
be conducted ,o ensure protection of human health and the environment.
The selected remedies are protective of human hea,th and the environment, compiy with Federal
and State reoutrements that are .egally applicabie or relevant and appropriate ,o the remediaf
actions and ar - me remedial
actions, and are cost-effective.
1.6
42
Consequently, 5-year reviews are not required for these sites.
SCI/l-98/WPOPcndleto/ROD12l99.wpd
-------
FOR THE UNTIED STATES MARINE CORPS. MARINE CORPS BASE CAMP
PENDLETON:
E. HaSon, Jr>X
Major General, U.S. M^nife Corps
Commanding
\o
Date
FOR THE UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY:
Daniel D. Opalski
Chief, Federal Facilities Cleanup Office
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Region DC
Date
FOR
RNIA ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY:
John E. Scandura
Chief, Southern California Operations
Office of Military Facilities
Department of Toxic Substances Control
Date
Officer
Regional Water Quality Control Board, San Diego Region
Date
. 1-7
-------
-------
I
•SLANG
MARINE CORPS
BASE CAMP
PENOLETON
S^ANIJ
NAS W IRA WAR
NAS NORTH
'SLAND
SCALE
N'AviL iNiSC- AND
SJP=C'K- AC'v-T-, -9S4. "
5Z MI.ES
'A.
FIGURE t-1
LCXJATION MAP
MCB CAMP PEfSHiTOH CAUFORMA
PREPARED FOR
NAVAL FACILITIES
ENGINEERING SERVICE CENTER
CONTRACT NO. H47408-82-0-306a
INTERNATIONAL
TECHNOLOGY
CORPORATION
-------
^\
- MAJOR AREA BOUNDARIES
ROADS AND HIGHWAYS
— CREEKS AND STREAMS
MCB CAMP PENDLETON
BOUNDARY
MAJOR AREA DESIGNATION
OU J SITE LOCATION
-------
2.0 Decision Summary
General information about MCB Camp Pendleton and information common to the individual sites
arc presented first in this section, followed by information specific to each site. The general
discussion includes a general site description, site history and enforcement activities, the scope
and role of OU3, and the history of community participation.
2. 1 SK0 Name, Location, and Description
MCB Camp Pendleton is the primary Marine Corps amphibious training center on the west coast
Located between the cities of Los Angeles and San Diego, California, MCB Camp Pendleton
covers approximately 125,000 acres, almost entirely in San Diego County (Figure 1-1). Camp
Talega, in the 64 Area near the northwestern border of the base, extends into Orange County.
Surrounding communities include San Clemente to the northwest, Fallbrook to the east, and
Oceanside to the south. The base is bordered on the west by the Pacific Ocean and encompasses
17 miles of coastal area; rolling hills and valleys stretch inland from the coast an average of 10 to
12 miles.
Site History and Enforcement
Construction of MCB Camp Pendleton started in March 1942, and the base was dedicated as a
permanent base in October 1944. The base currently supports more than 36,000 military
personnel and employs approximately 4,600 civilians (Innis-Tennebaum Architects, Inc., 1990).
On 15 November 1989, MCB Camp Pendleton was added to the National Priorities List (NPL),
primarily because a herbicide was detected is two base drinking water production wells.
Highlights of Community Participation
The proposed plan for OU3 was released to the public on 1 May 1998. This document and
supporting documents were made available to the public in the information repositories at the Base
Library and the Oceanside Public Library. The public was also made aware of the availability of
these documents in the Administrative Record file, which is maintained at the Southwest Division
Navy offices in San Diego. The notice of availability for the proposed plan and supporting
documents was published in the North County Times, both Inland and Coastal Editions, the Sun
Post News, and the Scout newspapers on I May 1998. In addition, a public meeting was held on
SO/10.98WPC/Pen(Ueto/ROD10-27.wpd 2-1
-------
14 May 1998. Base, EPA, San Diego RWQCB, and Southwest Division Navy representatives
attended the public meeting. No members of the public attended the meeting. A verbatim
transcript of the pubic meeting was prepared in compliance with CERCLA Section 117(a)(2) and
is presented in Appendix A. No comments were received during the public comment period or
the public meeting.
2.3 Scope and Role of Operable Unit 3
For investigative purposes, the sites at MCB Camp Pendleton were assigned to groups based on
their potential impact to human health and the environment. Those sites that pose the highest
threat were addressed first and were designated Group A sites. OU1 consists of Group A Sites 9
and 24 soil and groundwater and Site 4/4A soil. The final ROD for OU1 (Southwest Division
Naval Facilities Engineering Command [SWDIV], I995a) was signed on 12 December 1995.
Other sites with lesser degrees of potential threat were investigated as Group B, C, or D sites. The
OU2 ROD includes sites from Groups A, B, and C as follows:
• Group A Sites: Site 3 soil, sediment, and groundwater, Site 5 soil and groundwater;
Site 6 soil, sediment, and surface water
• Group B Sites: Site 8A sediment and surface water; Sites 19,20, and 22 soil,
sediment, groundwater, and surface water
• Group C sites: Sites 2B and 31 soil; Sites 28 and 43 groundwater; Site 44 sediment
and surface water, Site 45 soil, sediment, and groundwater.
The final OU2 ROD was signed and issued on 30 September 1997 (SWDIV, 1997a).
OU3 includes 29 sites as listed in Section 1.1. OU4 includes groundwater at the 22/23 Area sites
plus Sites 1H, 21,30,33, and 1111. The final ROD for OU4 is scheduled for December 1999.
2.4 Remedial Action Selected for Sites 1A, W, 1E, 1F, and 2A
This section addresses five of the six OU3 sites requiring remedial action. Sites 1A, ID, IE, IF,
and 2A are discussed together due to the similar nature of the remedial actions proposed for each
site. Site 7, the other OU3 site requiring remedial action, is presented separately in Section 2.5. A
description of each site is provided, followed by a summary of site characteristics and potential
site risks. In general, only those parameters that exceed screening criteria are shown in the site-
SO/IO-98AVPCyPetxU«iVROD10-27.wpd 2-2
-------
specific figures because the decision was made to pursue remedial action for these sites. A
description of the alternatives evaluated for each site, a summary of the evaluation, and the
rationale for selection of the remedies follow the site descriptions, characteristics, and risks. Four
of the sites (Sites 1A, ID, IE, and IF) are former refuse burning grounds and one site (Site 2A) is
a former grease disposal pit
2.4.1 Site 1 - Refuse Burning Grounds
Four refuse burning grounds located throughout the base. Sites 1 A, ID, IE, and IF, require
remedial action. These four burning grounds are discussed concurrently.
2.4.1.1 Site Name, Location, and Description - Sites 1A, 1D, 1E, and 1F
Site 1 - Refuse Burning Grounds, consists of nine different areas that were used as burning
grounds for base refuse. The nine burning grounds are labeled 1A through II (Figure 1-2)
following the convention used in the initial assessment study (IAS) (Naval Energy and
Environmental Support Activity [NEESA], 1984). One of the burning grounds, Site 1G, is part of
the San Onofre landfill (Site 14), which has been removed from the CERCLA process and is
addressed under the State's landfill program. Four of the burning grounds require remediation and
are discussed hi this section. No action has been selected for the other four burning grounds, as
discussed in Section 2.5.
Site 1A is located hi a densely vegetated, undeveloped training region in 14 Area, immediately
northeast of base sewage treatment plant No. 1 (Figure 2-1). The 14 Area burning ground is no
longer in operation and land surrounding the site is covered with natural vegetation. The nearest
troop housing is approximately 0.25 mile west of the site and the nearest family housing, De Luz
Housing, is approximately 2 miles north of the site.
Site ID is located in 20 Area, immediately north of the intersection of Vandegrift Boulevard and
Stuart Mesa Road (Figure 2-2). The burning ground covers an area of approximately 400 by
220 feet Surrounding the site on the cast and south are plateaus that rise 150 feet above the
burning ground. The site is bordered on the north and west by relatively flat land containing
moderate to dense vegetation; the Santa Margarita River flows through this area. To the northeast
is the Box Canyon landfill; to the south, across Stuart Mesa Road, is the Twin Lake Sewage
Disposal Plant. An unpaved road runs along the northern boundary of the site.
SCVl(V98/WKVPeodfcto/RODI0.27.wp
-------
Site IE is located in 32 Area, along MACS Road, approximately 0.75 mile northwest of Stuart
Mesa Road, and approximately 3,000 feet from the Santa Margarita River (Figure 2-3). The
burning ground covers an area of approximately 200 by 120 feet.
Site IF is located in 43 Area, approximately 250 feet northeast of Basilone Road and immediately
northwest of its intersection with Las Pulgas Road (Figure 2-4). The burning ground covers an
area of approximately 275 by 280 feet The site is bordered on the southeast by Sites 2D and 20,
on the north and east by moderate to dense vegetation, and on the west and south by vegetation
and Basilone Road. The site slopes gently to the southeast and eventually drains into Pulgas
Creek. The surrounding area generally consists of low rolling hills.
2.4.13 Site History and Enforcemant Activities • Sit&s 1A, 1D, 1E, and IF
The refuse burning grounds were used from 1942 through the early 1970s to bum refuse generated
by base operations. The areas were not necessarily operated concurrently (NEESA, 1984) No
information is available on the specific years of operation or the volume of refuse disposed of by
burning at each burning ground. Until 1970, all refuse at the base was disposed of by burning
The entire base generated an estimated 20,000 to 28,000 tons of solid wastes annually, the entire
volume of which is assumed to have been distributed to the nine burning grounds.
Although there are no confirmed reports of hazardous waste disposal at these sites, the burning
grounds were the primary on-base disposal areas and, thus, could have been used for disposal of
hazardous wastes.
The refuse burning grounds were closed sometime between the late 1960sand 1971. Theburning
grounds were covered with native soil and allowed to revert to natural vegetation. Visual
inspection of the sites during 1984 revealed no evidence of environmental contamination (NEESA
1984). However, the cover material has since eroded, thereby exposing refuse at some of the
sites. Areas of stressed vegetation and stains have also been observed.
2.4.1.3 Summary of Sfts Characteristics
This section describes the investigations performed at Sites 1 A, ID, IE, and IF and summarizes
the geology/hydrogeology and sampling results for each.
SCVIO-98AVPOPendJ«
-------
2.4.1.3.1 Site 1A - Refuse Burning Ground In 14 Area
A Phase 1 RI was conducted during June and July 1996 and a Phase 2 RI was conducted from
May through June 1997 at Site 1A. Characterization of the site involved surface and subsurface
soil and groundwater sampling to evaluate potential contamination from the burning ground and
impact to human health and ecological receptors. Detailed results of the Phase 1 RI are presented
in the draft final Group D RI report (SWDIV, 1997b) and results of the Phase 2 RI are presented
in Appendix A of the draft final RI/FS for OU3 (SWDIV, 1998a). The results of these
investigations are summarized in this section.
A total of 18 soil samples, including 2 duplicates, were collected from six soil boring locations
during Phase 1. Sample locations are shown on Figure 2-1. Samples were analyzed for target
analyte list (TAL) metals, molybdenum, chromium VI, volatile organic compounds (VOCs),
semivolatile organic compounds (SVOCs), pesticides and polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), and
dioxins and furans. During Phase 2, a composite surface soil sample was collected from locations
1AB-01, 1AB-02, and 1AB-03 and a surface sample was collected from location 1AB-05. These
samples were split for TAL metals plus molybdenum analyses and lettuce and earthworm bioassay
studies.
One temporary well was drilled adjacent to boring location 1AB-01 as part of the Phase 1
investigation. A groundwater sample was collected at the water table (about 5.5 feet below ground
surface) and analyzed for TAL metals, molybdenum, chromium VI, VOCs, SVOCs, and general
chemistry.
Habitat receptor surveys and habitat mapping were conducted at Site 1A during June 1996 and
May 1997. Dominant vegetation types and corresponding wildlife were identified and mapped.
Wildlife surveys and small mammal trapping were also conducted in May 1997. Sherman live-
traps were used. Trapped animals were identified, marked with a nbntoxic marker, and released in
the location where they were trapped.
Special-status species surveys for the arroyo toad, the California gnatcatcher, and the least Bell's
vireo were conducted at Site 1A in late spring and early summer 1997. Also during May 1997,
terrestrial invertebrate samples, plant samples, and small mammal samples were collected in the
vicinity of sample locations 1AB-01,1AB-02,1AB-03, and 1AB-05. Nine plant tissue samples,
SCVlO98/WPGPMxttac/ROD10-27.wpd
2-5
-------
two invertebrate samples, and two mammal tissue samples were analyzed for TAL metals plus
molybdenum. Sample locations arc shown in Figure 2-1.
Geoloy
Geologic data were derived from the site boring logs. Shallow geology consists of unconsolidated
to poorly consolidated alluvium overlying granitic rock. The alluvium consists of silty sand from
ground surface to a maximum depth of 18 feet The remainder of the alluvium consists of fine- to
medium-grained sand. Groundwater was encountered betwee*5.4 and 18.6 feet No perennial
surface water is present in the vicinity of the Site 1A burning ground.
Soil Result*
The analytical results for soil samples collected during the Phase 1 and Phase 2 RI are summarized
in Figure 2-1.
Organic, s
With the exception of benzo(a)pyrene, no organic compounds were detected at concentrations
exceeding preliminary remediation goals (PRGs) in soil samples from Site 1A. Bcnzo(a)pyrene
was detected at a concentration of 0.3 milligram per kilogram (mg/kg) in the duplicate sample
from a depth of 10 feet in boring 1AB-02; this concentration is below the contract-required
detection limit (CRDL) but exceeds the PRO of 0.061 mg/kg.
Acetone was detected at a depth of 5 feet in two borings; the maximum concentration was
0.005 mg/kg. Trichloroethene (TCE) was detected at a concentration of 0.01 mg/kg at 5 feet in
boring 1AB-02. Benzoic acid was detected in the surface sample from boring 1 AB-05 at a
concentration of 0.094 mg/kg. Low concentrations of eight polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons -
(PAHs) were detected in the duplicate sample at the 10-foot interval of boring 1AB-02; the highest
PAH concentration detected was 0.5 mg/kg for 1*nzo
-------
Inorganics
Six metals were detected at concentrations exceeding PRGs: arsenic, beryllium, copper, lead,
manganese, and thallium. In general, arsenic concentrations were near background levels and
were higher in the northern portion of the site. Five arsenic detections exceeded the background
concentration. Lead exceeded the PRO and background in 10 samples. Lead concentrations were
generally higher in the northeastern portion of the site. The remaining four parameters exceeded
PRGs only once each, at depths from ground surface to 5 feet. Of these four parameters,
beryllium was below background.
The following 16 inorganic constituents were detected at concentrations exceeding PLEs:
antimony, arsenic, barium, boron, cadmium, chromium, copper, iron, lead, manganese, mercury,
molybdenum, selenium, thallium, vanadium, and zinc. Inorganic constituents were detected in all
six soil sampling locations (1AB-01 through 1AB-06) at concentrations exceeding PLEs. The
maximum concentrations of the 16 metals detected also exceeded background concentrations.
Grtmndwater
Groundwater results from the sample collected from temporary well 1 AGWT-01 are summarized
in the following paragraphs. Only detections above PRGs or MCLs are shown in Figure 2-1.
No organic compounds exceeded maximum contaminant levels (MCLs) or tap-water PRGs. Two
organic compounds, acetone and benzoic acid, were detected at concentrations of 1 and 7
micrograms per liter fag/1), respectively.
With the exception of manganese, no inorganics were detected at concentrations exceeding the
evaluation criteria. Manganese was detected at a concentration of 2,200 ^ig/1, which exceeds the
tap-water PRG of 1 ,700 pg/1.
Manganese has been detected in groundwater throughout MCB Camp Pendleton. In general,
manganese concentrations have been higher in hydropunch samples than in samples from
permanent monitoring wells, possibly because silts and total suspended solids (TSS) are not as
efficiently filtered in undeveloped temporary wells and hydropunch samples compared with fully
developed permanent wells. Because temporary well and hydropunch samples typically contain
more suspended solids, more nondissolved particles pass through the filter. Some manganese
SO/l(>.98yWJ>OPealleto1lODt0.27.wjKi 2-7
-------
particles may be small enough to pass through the 0.45-micron filter used in the field (Hem,
1985).
2.4.1.3.2 Site ID - Refuse Burning Ground In 20 Area
RI work was conducted at Site ID between December 1993 and October 1995 and between May
and July 1997. The RI involved surface and subsurface soil, groundwater, and biological sampling
to evaluate potential contamination from the burning ground and impact to human health and the
environment. Details of the investigations and results arc presented in the Group C report
(SWDIV, 1996a) and the draft final RI/FS for OU3 (SWDIV, 1998a). In October and November
1996, a supplemental field investigation was conducted by Kleinfelder to refine the vertical and
lateral extent of soil contamination (Kleinfelder, 1997).
During the Phase 1 RI, 22 soil samples were collected from four soil boring locations and four
separate surface soil locations to characterize soil contamination in the vicinity of the burning
ground at Site ID. The soil samples were analyzed for TAL metals, molybdenum, VOCs,
SVOCs, pesticides and PCBs, gasoline, diesel, dioxins, furans, and chlorinated herbicides. During
the supplemental Kleinfelder investigation, an additional 19 shallow soil samples were collected
and analyzed for metals. Sample locations are shown in Figure 2-2.
Biological surveys were conducted at Site ID during March through June 1995 and May through
July 1997. Habitat receptor surveys included mapping of dominant vegetation types and
corresponding wildlife. Wildlife surveys included bird, mammal, and herpetile (amphibian and
reptile) surveys and photographic surveys to document site use by nocturnal mammals. During
October 1995, biota sampling was conducted. Plant and invertebrate samples were collected, as
well as soil samples for bioassay testing (Rgure 2-2). Samples were analyzed for TAL metals plus
molybdenum. Special-status species surveys for the California gnatcatcher, least Bell's vireo, and
Pacific pocket mouse were conducted at Site ID during May, June, and July 1997.
Three shallow groundwater wells were drilled at Site ID to evaluate the potential for, and lateral
extent of, groundwater contamination. Three rounds of groundwater sampling were conducted in
March, July, and October 1994. Samples were analyzed for TAL metals and molybdenum, VOCs,
SVOCs, gasoline, diesel, and general chemistry.
SCI/10-9S/WPC/Pendtoo/ROD10-27.wpd 2-8
-------
Geology and Hydrogeolpgy
Site ID is located on the south edge of the alluvial plain in the lower portion of the Santa
Margarita Basin, approximately 2 miles upstream from the Pacific Ocean. The geology of the
basin consists of stream-deposited younger and older Quaternary alluvium overlying bedrock of
the San Mateo Formation. Site ID is underlain by older alluvium consisting of interbedded, fine-
to coarse-grained, unconsolidated to poorly consolidated sand, silt, and gravel interspersed with
clay lenses. The regional groundwater flow direction in the valley-fill aquifer is to the west The
current main channel of the Santa Margarita River is approximately 150 feet north of Site ID.
SoU Resuljs
Analytical results for soil samples collected during the RI and the supplemental investigation are
presented in Figure 2-2, Only detections that exceeded PRGs or PLEs and background, as
applicable, are shown.
Organic^
No organic compounds were reported at concentrations exceeding PRGs or PLEs.
Toluene was detected at a concentration of 2 mg/kg in boring 1DB-01. The maximum
concentration of bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate was 640 mg/kg in surface soil sample 1DSS003.
Chlorinated pesticides were detected in the upper 5 feet of soil across the site, with the highest
concentrations reported in surface soil samples. Total petroleum hydrocarbons (TPH) as diesel
and as gasoline were detected in two surface soil samples, at maximum concentrations of 90 and
910 mg/kg, respectively.
Of the 19 metals detected in Site ID soil, five (antimony, arsenic, beryllium, chromium, and lead)
were reported at concentrations exceeding PRGs.
The antimony concentration in 1DB-Q3 exceeded the PRO and background. Beryllium was
detected in IDS -01 at a concentration exceeding the PRO but below background. Arsenic and
chromium concentrations exceeding PRGs were reported for all soil boring and surface sample
locations. Surface soil samples 1DSS001, 1DSS002, and 1DSS003 contained arsenic, chromium,
and lead at concentrations exceeding PRGs and background.
SC»I&.9BAVPOPeodte««VROD10-27.wpd 2-9
-------
Inorganic constituents detected at concentrations exceeding background levels were reported at all
sampling locations, with the exception of 1DB-01, 1DB-03, and 1DSS004. Of the inorganic
constituents exceeding background concentrations, antimony, arsenic, boron, chromium, copper,
iron, lead, manganese, and zinc also exceeded the respective PLEs. The majority of the
constituents exceeding background and PLEs were reported in surface samples 1DSS001,
1DSS002, and 1DSS003.
The soil investigation conducted by Kleinfelder (1997) confirmed that elevated concentrations of
antimony, boron, cadmium, lead, mercury, and zinc are present in site soil. Abundant metal and
glass debris was observed scattered on the ground surface at or between locations of most of the
exploratory borings advanced by Kleinfelder. Most of the detected contamination is in surface or
near-surface soil. Inorganic concentrations exceeding PRGs and/or PLEs and background were
reported at locations K1DB-01, K1DB-03, K1DB-06, K1DB-09, K1DB-10, K1DB-12, K1DB-15,
K1DB-16, K1DB-17, K1DB-18, and K1DB-19.
Groundwater results are summarized in Figure 2-2. Only constituents exceeding MCLs or PRGs
are shown. During July 1994 (3rd quarter), 1,2-dichioroethane (DCA) was detected in well
1DW-01 at a concentration of 0.6 fig/1, which exceeds both the MCL and PRG. Benzoic acid,
butylbenzylphthalate, di-n-butylphthalate, diethylphthalate, and bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate were
detected in Site ID wells during the July and October 1994 sampling events. Three PAH
compounds were detected in well 1DW-01 during October 1994, each at a maximum
concentration of 1 ng/1. Each of these detections were below respective MCLs or PRGs.
Three metals were detected at concentrations exceeding tap-water PRGs: arsenic, beryllium, and
manganese. Arsenic exceeded background in well IDW-03 during May (2nd quarter) and
October 1994 (4th quarter). Beryllium exceeded the PRG but not the MCL in wells 1DW-02 and
IDW-03 during July 1994 (3rd quarter). The manganese concentration in well IDW-03 during
October 1994 exceeded the PRG and background.
2.4. 1.3.3 Site 1E- Refuse Burning Ground In 32 Ares
RI work at Site IE involved surface/subsurface soil sampling and biological sampling to
investigate potential contamination from the burning ground and impact to human health and
ecological receptors. No groundwater investigation was performed because groundwater is
SCVUV9J/WPC/Pendleto/RODIO-27.wp
-------
estimated to be more than 100 feet below ground surface in the vicinity of the site. At the
completion of the RI, a supplemental investigation was conducted by Kleinfelder (1997) during
October and November 1996 to refine the extent of soil contamination.
During the RI, 23 soil samples were collected from seven soil borings, five surface soil locations,
and one background surface soil location to characterize potential soil contamination in the vicinity
of the burning ground at Site IE. Sample locations are shown in Figure 2-3. The samples were
analyzed forTAL metals, VOCs, SVOCs, gasoline, diesel, pesticides, PCBs, dioxins, furans, and
chlorinated herbicides. During the supplemental investigation in 1996,11 additional soil samples
were collected and analyzed for TAL metals. These sample locations are also shown in
Figure 2-3.
Ecological investigations were also performed during the RI. A habitat and receptor survey was
conducted in March 1995 and dominant vegetation habitats were mapped. Bird and general
wildlife surveys were conducted to evaluate the potential presence of special-status species.
Mammal trapping, using Sherman live-traps, was conducted to identify small mammal use of the
site. All small mammals caught in the traps were identified and released.
During June 1995, one plant sample and one invertebrate composite sample were collected from
the three soil locations having the highest detections of pesticides and metals (1EB-02, 1EB-03,
and 1EB-06) (Figure 2-3). These samples were analyzed for TAL metals plus molybdenum,
pesticides, and PCBs. Special-status species surveys for the California gnatcatcher, least Bell's
vireo, and Pacific pocket mouse were conducted at Site IE during May, June, and July 1997 .
Geology and Hydrogeologv
Site IE is within the Santa Margarita Basin. The geology of this basin consists of stream-
deposited younger and older Quaternary alluvium overlying bedrock of the San Mateo Formation.
Site IE is underlain by older alluvium, which consists of interbedded, fine- to coarse-grained,
unconsolidated to poorly consolidated sand, silt, and grave! interspersed with clay lenses.
Based on the site geology, groundwater is assumed to flow to the southwest, following the surface
topography.
SCT10-9gWpopaaitoortioDIO.27.wpd 2-11
-------
No perennial surface water is present in the vicinity of the burning ground area; however, surface-
water flow is present in a lagoon downgradicnt from the site. During the winter, the tributary
canyon derives some of its water from runoff originating from the burning ground. Ephemeral
water from this canyon flows to an effluent lagoon and ultimately reaches the Santa Margarita
River.
Soil Resells
Soil analytical results arc summarized in Figure 2-3. Only detections that exceed background, if
available, and PRGs or PLEs are presented.
Qrganics
No organic compounds were reported at concentrations exceeding PRGs or PLEs.
Inorganic^
Of the 19 metals detected in Site IE soil, the following 6 exceeded PRGs: antimony, arsenic,
beryllium, cadmium, chromium, and lead. The majority of the metals that exceeded PRGs were
reported in shallow (0 to 5 feet) soU from borings 1EB-01,1EB-02,1EB-03, 1EB-04, and 1EB-06.
Antimony was detected at concentrations exceeding the PRG and background at locations
1ESS002 and 1EB-05. Lead concentrations exceeded the PRG and background in surface
samples 1ES002 and 1ESS003. Concentrations of arsenic and chromium exceeded PRGs and
background at locations 1ESS002,1ESS003, and 1EB-03. Beryllium, cadmium, and chromium
exceeded PRGs sporadically in several borings.
Inorganic constituents detected at concentrations exceeding PLEs (i.e., aluminum, antimony,
barium, boron, cobalt, copper, iron, lead, molybdenum, silver, and zinc) were reported at sampling
locations 1EB-01,1EB-03,1ESS02, and 1ES003. With the exception of boron, the maximum
concentrations of these constituents also exceeded background concentrations. A background
concentration is not available for boron.
The soil investigation conducted by Kleinfelder (1997) focused on the area near the bottom of an
existing canyon to evaluate potential impact from surface runoff and contaminant transport.
Overall, this investigation confirmed that antimony, arsenic, boron, cadmium, chromium, cobalt,
lead, and zinc concentrations in Site IE soil are elevated. Inorganic concentrations exceeding
SO/l(M8/WPOPeodkto/ROD10-27.wpd 2-12
-------
PROS and/or PLEs and background concentrations were reported at K1EB-01, K1EB-06, and
K1EB-07.
2.4.1.3.4 S/te 1F - Refuse Burning Ground In 43 Arm
Phase 1 of the RI was conducted at Site 1F in June and July 1996 and Phase 2 was conducted in
May, June, and July 1997. Details of the investigation and results are provided in the draft final
Group D RI report (SWDIV, 1997b) and the draft final RI/FS for OU3 (SWDIV, I998a) and are
summarized here. The RI work involved surface/subsurface soil sampling, groundwater sampling,
and biological surveys and sampling.
A total of 23 samples, including 2 duplicate samples were collected from four soil borings and one
surface soil location during Phase 1 to characterize potential soil contamination in the vicinity of
the burning ground at Site IF. Sample locations arc shown in Figure 2-4. Samples were analyzed
for TAL metals, molybdenum, chromium VI, VOCs, SVOCs, pesticides, and PCBs. In addition, a
temporary well (1FGWT-01) common to site boring 1FB-03 was installed and sampled during
Phase 1 (Figure 2-4). The groundwater sample was analyzed for TAL metals, molybdenum,
chromium VI, VOCs, SVOCs, and general chemistry. A habitat and receptor survey was also
conducted, and dominant vegetation types and corresponding wildlife habitats were identified and
mapped.
During the Phase 2 RI, special-status species surveys were conducted for the California
gnatcatcher and least Bell's vireo.
Geology and Hydrogeology
Based on the soil borings advanced at the site, shallow geology consists of unconsolidated and
semiconsolidated alluvium overlying the La Jolla Group. The alluvium is fine- to medium-grained
sand, silty sand, and clayey sand with fern discontinuous lenses of clay. Groundwater is assumed
to flow to the southeast following surface topography.
No perennial surface water is present ia the vicinity of Site IF. Surface water at the site is
ephemeral and follows the gently sloping ground surface to the southeast.
SaP10-9g/WPOPeodktaftODia-27.wpd 2-13
-------
Soil Results
Analytical results for soil samples collected from Site IF are summarized in Figure 2-4. Only
constituents that exceed both background and PRGs or PLEs arc shown.
Organics
No organic compounds were detected in Site IF soil samples at concentrations exceeding PRGs or
PLEs. Chlorinated pesticides (4.4'-DDD, 4,4'-DDE, and 4,4'-DDT) were detected at low
concentrations at the 5- and 10-foot intervals in borings 1FB-03 and 1FB-04; the maximum
chlorinated pesticide concentration was 0.026 rag/kg for 4,4-DDE.
Inoreanics
Six metals were detected at concentrations exceeding PRGs: antimony, arsenic, beryllium,
cadmium, lead, and copper. All but three of the arsenic concentrations and all of the beryllium
concentrations that exceeded PRGs were below background levels. Antimony, cadmium, copper
and lead concentrations that exceeded PRGs also exceeded background levels. These detections
occurred in the 5-foot interval samples from borings 1FB-03 and 1FB-04.
Concentrations of antimony, arsenic, boron, chromium, cobalt, copper, iron, lead, manganese,
molybdenum, silver, and zinc at sample locations 1FB-03 and 1FB-04 exceeded PLEs. With the
exception of boron, for which no background concentration is available, the maximum
concentrations of these inorganic constituents also exceeded background concentrations. The iron
concentration reported at a depth of 20 feet at location 1FB-02 exceeded the PLE and background.
However, this iron detection is not of ecological concern because of its depth.
Groundwater ftffmftt
No organics were detected in the groundwater sample collected at Site IF. Arsenic was detected
at a concentration of 23.4 ng/1, which exceeds the tap-water PRO but is below the MCL. The
detected concentration is consistent with concentrations observed in groundwater throughout the
base and is most likely representative of background water quality.
2.4.1.4 Summary of Site Riaks
The human health and ecological risk methodologies used for the OU3 sites are summarized in
this section. The assessments are presented in detail in the draft final RI report for Group C sites
and the draft final RI report for Group D sites (SWDIV, 1996a and 1997b).
SCV10-98TWXipBndlrtortlOD10.27.wiid 2-14
-------
Human Health Risk
The environmental sampling data were collected in accordance with knowledge-based, purposive
sampling decision logic, with additional samples to provide data in areas of high, medium, and
low contamination. All RI data were validated and evaluated in accordance with the EPA's Risk
Assessment Guidance for Superfimd (RAGS) (EPA, 1989b).
Exposure scenarios were developed based on available media at the site and current and future
land use. The reasonable maximum exposure (RME) receptor was assumed to be present on site
for all exposure scenarios.
Toxicity values for the chemicals of concern (COCs) were compiled from the Integrated Risk
Information System (IRIS) (EPA, 1992a), Health Effects Assessment Summary Tables (HEAST)
(EPA, 1992b), a Cal/EPA memorandum on criteria for carcinogens (Cal/EPA, 1992a), and
tetrachloroethene (PCE) and TCE profiles from the Superfund Health Risk Technical Support
Center (EPA, 1994). For the more recent risk assessments conducted after the EPA PRG tables
(EPA, 1995 and 1996a) were developed, toxicity values were cited from the above sources, as well
as from the National Center for Environmental Assessment.
Cancer slope factors (SFs) have been developed by the EPA for estimating excess lifetime cancer
risks associated with exposure to potentially carcinogenic chemicals. SF values, expressed in
milligrams per kilogram per day (mg/kg-day)'1, are multiplied by the estimated intake of a
potential carcinogen (expressed in mg/kg-day) to provide an upper-bound estimate of the excess
lifetime cancer risk associated with exposure at that intake level. The term "upper bound" reflects
the conservative estimate of the risks calculated from the SF. This approach makes
underestimation of the actual cancer risk highly unlikely. Cancer SF values arc derived from the
results of human epidemiological studies or chronic animal bioassays using animal-to-human
extrapolation and uncertainty factors.
Reference doses (RfDs) have been developed by the EPA to indicate the potential for adverse
health effects from exposure to chemicals exhibiting noncarcinogenic effects. RfDs (expressed in
mg/kg-day) are estimates of lifetime daily exposure levels for humans, including sensitive
individuals. Estimated intakes of chemicals from environmental media (e.g., the amount of a
chemical ingested from contaminated drinking water) can be compared with the RfD. RfDs arc
derived from human epidemiological studies or animal studies and incorporate uncertainty factors
SCV10-9g/WKtf>endIeta/RODIO-27.wpd 2-15
-------
or across media.
2-16
-------
Section 300.430(e)(2)(i)(AX2). An excess lifetime cancer risk exceeding 10" generally requites
remediation. Risk management should also be considered for an RME exposure with an HI
greater than 1.0.
Risks/hazards associated with chemicals of potential concern (COPCs) were evaluated using
maximum and representative (95 percent upper confidence limit [UCL]) concentrations for
residential land use and commercial industrial exposure scenarios.
Ecological Risk Assessment Methodology
The baseline ecological risk assessment (EcoRA) methodology is presented in detail in the RI
reports and work plans for the sites included in this ROD (SWDIV, 1991,1993a, 1993b, 1995b,
1996a, and 1998). This section summarizes the approach and methodology for the baseKne
EcoRA.
To address the EcoRA objectives, a phased approach is used, as suggested by the EPA (1992c).
This approach consists of three phases: site characterization and screening, initial determination
of ecological impact, and bioassessment.
Phase I - Site Characterization and Screening, involves identifying the presence and
concentrations of chemicals of potential ecological concern (COPECs) at the sites and
evaluating whether exposure pathways to ecological receptors exist.
• Phase n - Initial Determination of Ecological Impact, involves conducting ecological
comparisons between potentially impacted and nonimpacted areas. The comparison
can include parameters such as the presence or absence of species, health of plants and
animals, community structure, and contaminant concentrations in the tissues of plants
and animals in order to assess potential food-chain exposure. This phase includes
habitat and wildlife surveys and collection of biota to measure bioaccumulation in
plants, terrestrial invertebrates, and small mammals.
• Phase in - Bioassessment, involves further laboratory studies to determine what
COPEC concentrations result in measurable effects. Information collected as part of
this phase is used to help make decisions about potential remediation.
Quantification of potential risks to representative species was conducted using an HQ approach.
An HQ was calculated for each preliminary COPEC (soil and biota) or sample location (sediment
and surface water). The HQ was calculated by dividing the maximum detected concentration by
2-17
-------
the PLE for each representative species. Because there is uncertainty in the PLE derivation
process, the magnitude of the HQ is used as an indication of potential ecological effects and is
discussed in broad terms, i.e., an HQ <1.0 represents no or low risk, 1.0 to 10 represents low to
medium risk, 10 to 100 represents medium to high risk, and >100 represents high to very high
risk). This results of the HQ approach are evaluated in conjunction with qualitative site-specific
factors such as the extent of contamination or frequency of detection, habitat quality, and the home
range of representative mammals and birds (which indicates the amount of time each
representative species would potentially spend at each site).
A complete EcoRA requires several components. Although each is essential to the risk
assessment, not all contribute equal weight to the development of conclusions. In addition,
limitations and uncertainties arc associated with each component The conclusions of the EcoRA
are based on an assessment of the following:
• Reid surveys of receptor populations and habitats
• Home range of representative species
• Chemical concentrations in various media, including biota
Potential toxicity to primary receptors, as determined through comparisons with
reported and calculated effect levels (PLEs)
• Potential bioaccumulation of contaminants in primary receptors, as determined through
accumulation measurements using site-collected plants, aquatic, and terrestrial
invertebrates and comparison with concentrations measured in biota from reference
locations
• Potential bioaccumulation of contaminants in aquatic invertebrates to secondary
receptors, as determined through quantitative comparisons with PLEs for dietary
intake.
Potential bioaccumulation of detected chemicals by primary and secondary receptors was also
evaluated during the COPEC selection process. Bioaccumulation in primary receptors (terrestrial
plants and aquatic and terrestrial invertebrates) was evaluated by comparing chemical
concentrations detected in field-collected biota with concentrations detected in similar biota
collected from several reference locations in the vicinity of the sites or at upstream locations.
Bioaccumulation in secondary receptors (representative mammals and birds) was evaluated by
SO/10-93AVPOPeodktcVRODIO-27.wpd 2-18
-------
calculating bioaccumulation factors from field-collected plants, terrestrial invertebrates, and mice.
These bioaccumulation factors were combined with toxicity information and dietary composition
to derive soil PLEs for mammals and birds. Bioaccumulation in secondary receptors was also
evaluated by calculating dietary PLEs for mammalian ingestion of aquatic invertebrates.
Potential chemical migration and exposure pathways were evaluated for each site. Current land
use scenarios were used in the assessment. Results of the exposure assessment indicated that.
exposure to terrestrial plants and wildlife could occur through the following major pathways:
• Ingestion of soil
• Ingestion of surface water
• Root absorption of chemicals in soil plants).
Exposures to aquatic plants and organisms could occur through the following pathways:
Ingestion of sediment
Ingestion of surface water
Inhalation (across gill surfaces) of dissolved chemicals in surface water
Dermal absorption of chemicals in surface water or sediment
Root absorption of chemicals in sediment or surface water (plants).
Results of the field surveys, COPEC selection process, exposure assessment, and ecological
effects assessment were evaluated in the risk characterization to identify final COPECs for each
site. The recommendations for each site are based on both the quantitative and qualitative
evaluations.
The PLEs for bird and mammal representative species were modified during the risk estimation
based on a site-use factor calculated from the area of contamination for each COPEC and the
foraging area for each representative bird or mammal species. The size of the area of concern was
divided by the foraging range for each representative species to estimate the site-use factor. PLEs
were modified only for COPECs that exceeded PLEs in the initial screening.
2.4.1.4.1 Sits 1A - Refuse Burning Ground in 14 Area
This section summarizes the results of the human health risk assessment (HHRA) and EcoRA for
Site 1A.
SOT1098/WPOTtndJeto/ROD10-27.wpd 2-19
-------
Hum... R»M, Bht rh.,^ riffle
Tto probable sources of contamination a, Site IA are Ih. Ktae bunung g^md, surface soils and
-»•*"•-•. Pc^^
I
surface and subsurface sous, m potential nxepto* m ^idem,
I locations Md fte resulte WCK
Tie risk scteentag for soil exposure ostog
Reptacing to ™m conceptions Witt, fl. 95 p««,t UCL concenfations of the COPCs
and excg tt« pomon of the d* ^buu*
n
'-iiioJmd9^io^'^^^
management range.
is 19.0. Ustog fte
concen^ons. the cun-utoive resident ffl is ,4.0.
8.800 mg&g. Tlus exceeds the baAgrcund «»«„,„„!„„ for „« Sm ^ j^
00.2 mg/kg) and is a. te« one order of magnitude greater tt,an tt» EPA rcsidentia, soU PRO of
400 mgftg and the Cal/EPA residential Ma PRO of 130 mg/kg. ««oiincoof
As panted to 0« Omup D RI report (SWDIV. ,997b). Ste 1 A »!
2-20
-------
hazard; the HI exceeds the threshold value of 1.0. Final human health COCs for soils are arsenic,
copper, thallium, and lead.
Excess cancer risk and noncarcinogenic health hazard for the future residential exposure scenario
were evaluated for the groundwater pathway. No cancer risk was estimated because no
carcinogenic contaminants were detected in groundwater. The HI is 1.6 and is primarily
attributable to manganese (approximately 81 percent of the total hazard). For individual target
organs, only the centra] nervous system exceeds the noncarcinogenic hazard criterion of 1.0
(HQ 1.3).
Uncertainty in the RfD used to calculate the PRG for manganese could result in an overestimation
of hazard. In addition, uncertainty is associated with the results for the groundwater sample,
which was collected from a temporary well. Temporary well groundwater samples usually have
higher TSS (the sample is usually muddy) than samples from permanent wells because of the
disturbance associated with the sampling method. Because samples from temporary wells contain
more particles, more nondissolved particles could pass through the filter used in the field (Hem,
1985) and could result in a higher concentration of manganese hi temporary well samples.
Manganese is also naturally occurring, and some of the manganese in groundwater at Site 1A is
assumed to be within the background concentration.
Groundwater at Site 1A is considered protective of human health for the following reasons:
• No carcinogenic chemicals were detected in groundwater.
9 The HI only slightly exceeds 1.0 (HQ 1.3) for one target organ, the central nervous
system, and the uncertainty associated with toxicity of manganese could result in an
overestimation of hazard.
• A portion of the manganese concentration is likely background rather than site related.
Slimimd GrftUlldwater and Soil Human Health Risk and Hasard
If it is conservatively assumed that under the future unrestricted residential use scenario a
hypothetical resident could be exposed to soil contaminants and groundwater through domestic
use, the incremental site risks and hazards for soil and groundwater can be summed for an overall
residential exposure. Because no carcinogenic COPCs were detected in groundwater at Site 1 A,
SCVIO-98AVFOPeadle«VROD10-27.wpd 2-21
-------
the incremental site risk (9x10-*) is completely attributable to soil, primarily due to arsenic. The
incremental site hazard from soil (HI 12.3) combined with groundwater (HI 1.6) results in a total
residential hazard of approximately 14.0. As discussed previously, the only target organ
exceeding a hazard of 1.0 for groundwater was the central nervous system as a result of
manganese. Consequently, the noncarcinogenic health hazard for Site 1A is primarily associated
with site soil, specifically with metals. Individually, the potential exposure to either soil or
groundwater represents the upper-bound RME; when combined, the potential exposure is likely
much more conservative than the RME. The combined exposure should be considered a worst-
case exposure scenario, especially given the low likelihood of residential use of this site combined
with a low likelihood of placing a drinking water well at the point of the plume corresponding to
maximum groundwater concentrations.
Site 1A consists primarily of areas of California sagebrush series habitat with some disturbed
areas. Some downstream portions of the site and its drainage pathway have riparian habitat.
Representative species were selected for (this site) based on habitat types and expected occurrence
of special-status species. The representative species include plants, terrestrial invertebrates,
California gnatcatcher, California quail, least Bell's vireo. Belding's savannah sparrow, California
mouse, and deer mouse. Although portions of the site are disturbed, several wildlife species were
observed on site, including the California gnatcatcher. The California gnatcatcher is a listed
Federal threatened species and a State special-status species.
Soil concentrations for 17 preliminary inorganic COPECs exceeded background values. These
inorganics and all detected organic COPECs were retained for the initial ecological risk screening.
The results of the initial risk screening indicated that several inorganic constituents and a few
organic compounds exceeded PLEs. COPECs exceeding PLEs were identified at all six soil
sampling locations.
A final risk screening was conducted by modifying the PLEs for birds and mammals based on the
foraging range and the size of the area of concern. These screening results indicated that modified
PLEs were exceeded for plants, invertebrates, California quail, California gnatcatcher, least Bell's
vireo, Belding's savannah sparrow, California mouse, and deer mouse. The following
contaminants exceeded modified PLEs: antimony, arsenic, barium, boron, cadmium, chromium,
2-22
-------
copper, iron, lead, manganese, mercury, molybdenum, nickel, selenium, thallium, vanadium zinc
4,4'-DDE, and 4,4'-DDT.
Subsequent to the risk screenings, biota tissue collected from site plants, invertebrates, and mice
were compared against reference concentrations to evaluate adverse effects to ecological receptors
due to bioaccumulation. Comparisons against reference concentrations for plants showed that site
tissue concentrations of arsenic, chromium, copper, iron, lead, manganese, molybdenum, and zinc
exceeded reference tissue concentrations. The tissue quotients arc close to 1.0 for chromium
(1.1), copper (1.2), and iron (1.6). However, tissue quotieats for arsenic, lead, manganese,
molybdenum, and zinc indicated that these COPECs are bioaccumulating and could result in
adverse effects directly to plants or to receptors feeding on the plants. Comparison against
reference concentrations for invertebrates were similar to those for plants and indicated that
arsenic, copper, lead, manganese, and zinc are bioaccumulating in invertebrates and could result in
either direct toxicity or food-chain transfer.
Comparison against reference concentrations for mice indicated that only manganese and nickel
were present at concentrations greater than reference location concentrations. However, nickel did
not exceed PLEs in the final screening and the tissue quotient is close to 1.0 (1.2). indicating the
potential bioaccumulation risk from nickel is low. The tissue quotient for manganese is 2.9,
indicating that manganese is bioaccumulating and could result in adverse effects directly to'mice
or to receptors feeding on them.
All COPECs that exceeded modified PLEs were retained as chemicals of ecological concern
(COECs) with the exception of cadmium, molybdenum, selenium, 4,4'-DDE, and 4,4'-DDT. The
HQs for cadmium, molybdenum, 4,4'-DDE, and 4,4'-DDT arc very close to 1.0, indicating low
potential risk. Selenium exceeded PLEs in only one sample (1AB-01) and had HQs close to 1.0,
also indicating low potential risk.
The results of the EcoRA indicate that several inorganic chemicals are present in Site 1A soils at
concentrations that could be directly toxic to ecological receptors or could bioaccumulate in the
wildlife food chain. The final COECs for Site 1A arc antimony, arsenic, barium, boron.
chromium, copper, iron, lead, manganese, mercury, thallium, vanadium, and zinc.
2-23
-------
2.4. 1.43 Site 10 - Refuse Burning Ground In 20 Ana
This section summarizes the results of the HHRA and EcoRA for Site ID.
Human Health Risk rin.^^ rfr
The conceptual site model for Site ID indicates that current/future workers and future residents
could be exposed to soil contaminants through incidental ingestion, dermal contact, and inhalation
of VOCs and soil particulates. The model also shows that future workers and residents could be
exposed to groundwater contaminants through inhalation of VOCs, ingestion of groundwater. and
dermal contact with groundwater. The primary source of contaminants is burned and/or partially
burned refuse, and the secondary source is underlying or adjacent soils. Analytical results
collected during the Group C RI (SWDIV, 1996a) wert used for the risk assessment
The risk screening for soil exposure using maximum detected chemical concentrations for
residential land use results in a cumulative residential risk of 2x10- Subtracting the portion of
nsk contributed by background concentrations, the ILCR is 3x10''. The HI for the same scenario
(..e., removing the contribution from background) is 10.1. The primary contributors to risk and/or
hazard are antimony, arsenic, and chromium. In addition, the maximum lead concentration
(1,100 mg/kg) exceeds background, the EPA residential soil PRO of 400 mg/kg, and the Cal/EPA
res,dential soil PRG of 130 mg/kg. The site-related risk and hazard indicate that further action is
necessary.
To evaluate potential risks due to groundwater exposure, maximum concentrations were used for a
residential scenario. The site-related carcinogenic risk, ILCR, is 2xl0^and the ffl is i 2 The
potential risk was evaluated further using representative concentrations and resulted in an ILCR of
4x10- and an HI of less than 1.0. Beryllium, detected in only 2 of 10 samples, contributes more
than99percentofthe4X10-'lLCR. Although beryllium is a risk contributor in soil at Site ID no
on-base activities are known or suspected of generating beryllium wastes. The average site
concentration of beryllium is 1.27 ug/1, and the background concentration is 1 ug/1. As such the
beryllium concentration is likely representative of background Based on the reasons presented,
potential groundwater risks at Site ID are considered acceptable.
Ecolmrfgal Risk A
ommant habitat at Site ID is California sagebrush series, interspersed with areas of open
disturbed habitat Various herpetiles, birds, and mammals were observed during general wildlife
SCVIO-9VWPCyPaxlVsaTlOD10.27.wpd 2-24
-------
surveys of the site. Coastal California gnatcatchers, a special-status species, were also observed.
Representative species were selected for this site based on predominant habitat types and include
plants, terrestrial invertebrates, California mouse, California quail, and California gnatcatcher.
Concentrations of inorganic chemicals at Site ID were compared with background values for the
Santa Margarita Basin. Concentrations of 13 preliminary inorganic COPECs exceeded available
background values and were retained for the initial ecological risk screening, along with all
preliminary organic COPECs plus boron. The results of the initial screening indicated that the
maximum concentrations of 10 inorganic constituents exceeded PLEs. None of the detected
organics exceeded PLEs.
Biota tissue collected from plants and invertebrates were compared against reference
concentrations to evaluate adverse effects to ecological receptors due to bioaccumulation.
Comparisons against reference concentrations for plants indicated that site tissue concentrations of
arsenic, manganese, and zinc were close to the reference concentrations and indicate that exposure
to these COPECs will not result in any increased risk to plants. No site invertebrate tissue
concentrations exceeded reference concentrations.
A final risk screening was conducted by modifying PLEs. COPECs and HQs greater than 1 .0
were grouped into areas of concern based on sample locations where PLEs were exceeded for any
representative species. The size of the areas were estimated and the PLEs for birds and
were modified based on the foraging range for each representative species and the size of the area
of concern. The final risk screening results indicated that modified PLEs were exceeded for
plants, invertebrates, California quail, California gnatcatcher, and California mouse. The COPECs
exceeding modified PLEs were antimony, arsenic, boron, chromium, copper, iron, lead,
manganese, mercury, and zinc. Antimony, copper, iron, lead, and zinc were retained as COECs.
Arsenic, boron, chromium, and manganese were not retained because HQs for each species, with
the exception of birds, were less than 1.0. The HQs for birds were close to 1 .0, indicating low
potential risk. In addition, incremental risk above background concentrations resulted in HQs less
than 1 .0, indicating that the majority of risk is due to background levels. Mercury was not retained
because it was detected only once, at location 1DSS003, and HQs were less than 1.0 for all species
except the California mouse, which had an HQ of 1.2, which is close to 1.0. -
SCI/10-98AVFOPeo
-------
The results of the EcoRA indicate that antimony, copper, iron, lead, and zinc are present in
Site ID soils at concentrations that could be directly toxic to ecological receptors or could
bioaccumulate in the wildlife food chain.
2.4. 1.4.3 Site IE - Refuse Burning Ground In 32 Area
This section summarizes the results of the HHRA and EcoRA for Site IE.
Human H«Jth Risk rharnoeri^m
The conceptual site model for Site IE indicates that current/future workers and potential future
residents could be exposed to soil contaminants through incidental ingestion, dermal contact, and
inhalation of VOCs and soil particulates. There arc no complete groundwater exposure pathways
at this site. The primary source of contaminants is burned and/or partially burned refuse; the
secondary source is underlying or adjacent soils. Analytical results collected during the Group C
RI (SWDIV, 1996a) were used for the risk assessment
The risk screening for soil exposure using maximum detected concentrations for residential land
use results in a cumulative residential risk of 6x10^ and an HI of 20.1. Subtracting the portion of
nsk and hazard contributed by background concentrations, the ILCR is 4xlO-*and the HI is 18.4
The site-related primary contributors to risk and/or hazard are antimony, arsenic, and chromium.
In addition, the maximum lead concentration of 1,610 mg/kg exceeds background, the EPA
residential PRO of 400 mg/kg, and the Cal/EPA residential soil PRO of 130 mg/kg.
The ILCR and the HI both exceed EPA acceptable levels, and evaluation of remedial actions was
recommended.
Ecological Risk
Habitat at Site lEconsists primarily of California sagebrush series habitat Various herpetiles,
birds, and mammals were observed on site during general wildlife surveys. Pairs of coastal
California gnatcatchers, a special-status species, were also observed at Site IE. Representative
species were selected for this site based on habitat types and include plants, terrestrial
invertebrates. Pacific pocket mouse, California quail, and California gnatcateher.
Concentrations of inorganic chemicals at Site IE were compared with background values for the
Santa Margarita Basin. Concentrations of 17 preliminary inorganic COPECs exceeded available
SCW0.9S/WPC/PwdteottOD10-27.wpd 2-26
-------
background values and were retained for the initial ecological risk screening along with all
detected preliminary organic COPECs and boron. The results of this screening indicated that the
maximum concentrations of 15 inorganic constituents exceeded PLEs.
Biota tissue collected from site plants and invertebrates were compared against reference
concentrations to evaluate adverse effects to ecological receptors due to bioaccumulation.
Comparisons against reference concentrations for plants indicated that site tissue concentrations of
arsenic and mercury were greater than reference location concentrations. The tissue quotient for
arsenic (1.6) indicated that concentrations are close to reference concentrations and are not
expected to result on any increased risk to plants or receptors feeding on plants at the site. The
tissue quotient for mercury is 2.3; however, this COPEC did not exceed PLEs for plants in either
the initial or final screening, indicating only a small potential risk to receptors.
Comparisons against reference concentrations for invertebrates indicated that site tissue
concentrations of cadmium, copper, and zinc were slightly greater than reference location
concentrations. Tissue quotients were 1.6 for cadmium, 7.0 for copper, and 1.3 for zinc.
Cadmium and zinc concentrations are close to the reference concentrations and indicate that
exposure to these COPECs by invertebrates at the site would not result in increased risk. The
tissue quotient for copper indicates that copper concentrations may pose an increased risk to
invertebrates and receptors feeding on invertebrates at the site.
A final risk screening was conducted by modifying the PLEs for birds and mammals based on the
foraging range for each representative species and the size of the area of concern. The final risk
screening results indicated that modified PLEs were exceeded for plants, invertebrates, California
quail, California gnatcatcher, and Pacific pocket mouse. COPECs exceeding modified PLEs are
aluminum, antimony, barium, boron, cobalt, copper, iron, lead, molybdenum, stiver, and zinc.
With the exception of barium, boron, molybdenum, and silver, these contaminants were retained
asCOECs.
Barium was not considered to pose a risk because HQs above 1.0 were due largely to background
concentrations. Although the HQ for the representative Pacific pocket mouse still exceeds 1.0,
excluding background, small mammals using this site are not expected to spend all of their time at
Site IE. In addition, no Pacific pocket mice were observed on site during surveys. Boron was not
retained because the HQs were close to 1.0 (1.2 to 1.5). Molybdenum was not retained because
SCV10-9RWKVPeodi«omODIO-27.wpd 2-27
-------
plants were the only representative species for which PLEs were exceeded, and the HQs arc close
to 1.0. SUver was delected at locations 1ESS002 and 1ESS003 only. At 1ESS002, the HQs for
silver only slightly exceeded the plant PLE (HQ of 1.04). At 1ESS003, only one of the detected
results exceeded the plant and invertebrate PLEs; the HQs for the other detected silver
concentrations were less than 1.0.
The results of the EcoRA indicate that several inorganic chemicals arc present in Site IE soils at
concentrations that could be directly toxic to ecological receptors or could bioaccumulate in the
wildlife food chain.
2.4. 1.4.4 Site 1F - Refuse Burning Ground In 43 Area
This section summarizes the results of the HHRA and EcoRA for Site IF.
Human Health PtA rhgf.^f rfratlirn
The conceptual site model for Site IF indicates that currentffuture residents could be exposed to
soU contaminants-through incidental ingestion, dermal contact, and inhalation. The model also
indicates that potential future residents could be exposed to groundwater contaminants through
ingestion, inhalation of VOCs, and dermal contact The primary source of contaminants is burned
or partially burned refuse, and the secondary source is underlying or adjacent soils. Analytical
results from samples collected during the Group D RI (SWDIV. 1997b) were used for the risk
assessment.
The risk screening for soils using the maximum detected chemical concentrations results in a
cumulative residential risk of 3xlO'J. Subtracting the portion of total risk attributable to naturally
occurring metals or background, the ILCR is 2.2xlO'3. The cumulative residential ffl for
maximum detected contaminants is 8.7. Subtracting the portion attributable to background metals,
the incremental HI is 7.5. The maximum lead concentration (1,260 mg/kg) exceeds the EPA
residential soil screening value of 400 mg/kg and the Cal/EPA residential soil PRO of 130 mg/kg.
Because the HI exceeds the threshold criterion of 1.0, further risk evaluation for soil was
conducted using a more reasonable value, the 95 percent UCL of the average concentration. Using
the 95 percent UCL. the ILCRs for the residential scenario based on Region DC and Cal/EPA
PRGs arc 9.9x10* and 1.2xlO's. The incremental HI is 7.3. The HI results primarily from a single
high detection of copper at 12,500 mg/kg. This detection is a duplicate of the original sample,
2-28
-------
which had a reported concentration of 821 mg/kg. As such, a degree of uncertainty is associated
with the copper results. Lead and antimony are the other main contributors to hazard
Potential residential carcinogenic risks for soil are within the risk management range and are
considered acceptable for this site. However, potential noncarcinogenic hazard exceeds the
acceptable criterion of 1 .0, thus requiring further action.
To evaluate potential risks due to groundwater exposure, maximum concentrations were used for a
residential scenario. The ILCR is 5.2x10"* and is completely attributable to arsenic. However, the
maximum reported value of arsenic, 23.4 micrograms per liter (ug/1), is less than the MCL of
50 ug/1. The noncarcinogenic ffl is 3.9 and is primarily attributable to arsenic and boron. As
stated, the maximum arsenic concentration is less than the MO- and would not likely represent a
threat to human health via ingestion. Boron is not likely a result of site-related activities. For the
above stated reasons, groundwater at Site IF is considered protective of humanjiealth.
Ecoloical
Two brushfires have disturbed the habitat at Site IF. One fire occurred in June 1996, just prior to
the initial site habitat evaluation. The second brushfire occurred in early summer 1997 between
site visits to evaluate special-status species. Prior to the second fire, the site was sparsely
vegetated with California sagebrush series habitat. Various birds, the black-tailed hare, house
mice, and deer mice were observed at the site. No coastal California gnatcatchers or least Bell's
vireos, both special-status species, were observed at the site prior to the 1997 brushfirc. However,
least Bell's vireos were identified in riparian vegetation along Pulgas Creek adjacent to the site.
The representative species selected for evaluation of this site include plants, terrestrial
invertebrates, Beiding's savannah sparrow, and deer mouse.
Potential ecological risks at Site IF were evaluated using the RI data and sampling locations
presented in the draft final Group D RI report (SWDIV, 1997b).
Concentrations of inorganic chemicals detected at the site were compared with background values
for the Las Flores Basin background area. Background values were available for all inorganic
chemicals detected except boron. Concentrations of 14 preliminary inorganic COPECs exceeded
available background values and were retained for the initial ecological risk screening, along with
boron and all detected preliminary organics. The results of the initial screening indicated that the
2-29
-------
maximum concentrations of 13 inorganic constituents exceeded-PLEs. None of the detected
organics exceeded PLEs.
In accordance with the work plan, biota samples (i.e., plants, terrestrial invertebrates, and small
mammals) were not collected for tissue analysis at this site during the Phase 2 sampling conducted
in May 1997. The site is similar to Site 1A in historical, use, habitat types, and potential
ecological receptors. Because of their similarities, the biota sampling and bioassays conducted at
Site 1A were extrapolated to Site IF. Both sites are historical refuse burning grounds that consist
of coastal sage scrub and disturbed habitat The representative species for Site IF included plants,
terrestrial invertebrates, Beldings's savannah sparrow, and deer mouse. These species were also
among those selected for Site 1A.
Biota tissue collected at Site 1A included plants, invertebrates, and mice. These tissue
concentrations were also compared against reference concentrations for the chemicals detected at
Site IF. Comparisons for plants indicated that tissue concentrations of arsenic (tissue quotient of
3), chromium (1.1), copper (1.2), iron (1.6), lead (10), manganese (2.9), molybdenum (3.4), and
zinc (9.2) were elevated compared with reference plants. Soil concentrations of arsenic,
chromium, manganese, and molybdenum at Site IF did not exceed plant PLEs, but only zinc
slightly exceeded the PLE (1.2) at one sampling location (B-3). Copper, iron, and lead exceeded
plant PLEs at two sampling locations (B-3 and B-4). Results of soil and biota evaluations indicate
that copper and iron may bioaccumulate to a limited degree but are of more concern with regard to
direct toxicity to plants. Zinc is bioaccumulating and could result in adverse effects directly to
plants or to those receptors feeding on them.
Comparisons against reference concentrations for invertebrates were generally similar to those for
plants. Resulting tissue quotients for arsenic (3.4), copper (10), lead (12), manganese (5.1), and
zinc (4) indicated that these chemicals were accumulating in invertebrates collected from Site 1 A.
However, none of these chemicals exceeded soil PLEs for invertebrates in Site IF, indicating that
any potential risk at the site would be through food-chain transfer rather than direct toxicity.
Comparisons against reference concentrations for mice indicated that only manganese and nickel
were present at concentrations exceeding reference values. Tissue quotients were 2.9 and 1.2,
respectively. Manganese did not exceed small mammal PLEs in the final screening and nickel did
not exceed small mammal PLEs in either the initial or final screening. These results indicate that
SO/10-98AVPOPcodlcto/ROD10-27.wpd 2-30
-------
soil concentrations of manganese and nickel at Site 1* are of limited concern to mammals through
either direct toxicity or food-chain transfer.
COPECs with HQs greater than 1.0 were grouped into areas of concern based on sample locations
where PLEs were exceeded for any representative species. The size of the areas were estimated
and the PLEs for birds and mammals were modified based on size of the area of concern relative
to the foragmg area for each representative species. The modified PLEs were then used for the
final risk screening.
The final risk screening results indicated that modified PLEs were exceeded for plants
invertebrates, Belding's sparrow, and deer mouse. COPECs with HQs exceeding 1 0 L
antimony, arsenic, boron, chromium, cobalt, copper, iron, lead, manganese, molybdenum, silver
and zmc. Arsenic, boron, chromium, cobalt, manganese, molybdenum, and silver were not
retamed as COECs because of their low potential risk indicated by low HQs, near background
concentrations, and/or low frequency of detections.
The results of the EcoRA indicate that several inorganic chemicals are present in Site IF soils at
concentrations that could be directly toxic to ecological receptors or could bioaccumulate in the
wildlife food chain.
2.43 Site 2A-Gf®ase Disposal PK In 14 Ana
This section addresses Site 2A and summarizes site history and characteristics and associated
risks.
Site Name, Location, and Description
Site 2A - Grease Disposal Pit in 14 Area, is located off Pilgrim Creek East TrailsRoad
(Figure 2-5) and is one of seven mess hall grease pits scattered throughout the base The grease
disposal pit boundary is approximately 200 feet long and 300 feet wide. The site is bordered on
the west and southwest by Site 1 A and on the north, east, and south by areas of light to moderate
vegetation. Site 2A slopes gently to the southwest and eventually drains into a stream-cut canyon
adjacent to Site 1A. The surrounding area is characterized by low rolling hills.
2-31
-------
2.42.2 Site History and Enforcement Activities
Grease disposal pits, typically less than 10 feet deep, were used throughout the base from 1942 to
1980 for disposal of mess hall grease. Petroleum, oil, and lubricants (POLs) may have also been
placed in the pits. No information is available on the specific years of operation or the amount of
grease disposed of in the pit at Site 2A. A burn area is adjacent to the disposal pit at 2A.
The pit at Site 2A was closed by allowing the disposed materials to decay to a semisolid state and
then backfilling with native soil.
2.43.3 Summary of Stta Characteristics
RI work at Site 2A involved surface/subsurface soil sampling and ecological surveys. No
groundwater or surface-water sampling was performed. The investigation was conducted in two
phases. Phase 1 was conducted in June 1996, and Phase 2 was conducted in May through July
1997. J>tailed results of Phase 1 are presented in the draft final Group D RI report (SWDIV,
1997b) and results of the Phase 2 RI are presented in Appendix A of the draft final RI/FS for OU3
(SWDIV, 1998a). A summary is presented in this section.
A total of 19 samples, including 1 duplicate, were collected from five soU boring locations as part
of Phase 1. Sample locations arc shown in Figure 2-5. The borings were terminated when
granitic material was encountered at depths between 15 and 20 feet below grade. The soil samples
were analyzed for TAL metals, molybdenum, chromium VI, VOCs, SVOCs, dioxins. and furans.
A habitat and receptor survey was conducted in June 1996. Dominant vegetation types and
corresponding wildlife habitats were identified. During the 1997 Phase 2 investigation, small
mammal trapping was conducted using Sherman live-traps. Trapped animals were identified,
marked with a nontoxic marker, and released in the location where they were trapped. Surveys for
special-status species, the California gnatcatcher and least Bell's viieo, were also conducted as
part of the Phase 2 effort. Soil, plant tissue, and animal tissue were collected during Phase 2 for
chemical analyses and bioassay studies to refine the conclusions of the EcoRA. Five plant
samples, two invertebrate samples, and two mice samples were collected at Site 2A. One surface
soil sample and one duplicate were collected from sample location 2AB-05. Soil and tissue
samples were analyzed for TAL metals plus molybdenum and for organochlorine pesticides.
SCTIO.9SAVK2PeadktattOD10-27.wpd 2-32
-------
2.43.3.1 G&ology and Hydrogeology
Geologic data were derived from the five soil borings advanced at the site. Shallow geology at the
site is characterized by semiconsolidated to consolidated alluvium consisting of fine-to medium-
grained, poorly graded sand, silt, and sand with silt. The alluvium overlies massive granitic
basement rock. Basement granitic rock was encountered in all five soil borings at depths ranging
from 3.5 to 18 feet Based on site geology, groundwater is assumed to flow to the southwest,
following surface topography. Using groundwater elevations from a nearby site and ground
surface elevations, the depth to groundwater at site 2A is estimated to be nearly 100 feet below
grade. No perennial surface water is present in the vicinity of Site 2A.
!
2.43.3.2 Soil Results
The analytical results for soil are summarized in Figure 2-5. Only results that exceed background
and PRGs or PLEs are shown.
Two chlorinated pesticides were detected at concentrations at or exceeding PRGs at Site 2A:
4,4'-DDD in the 5-foot interval sample and 4,4'-DDE in the 5- and 10-foot interval samples from
boring 2AB-05. In addition, 15 other organic contaminants were detected at concentrations below
PRGs. Four VOCs were detected at low concentrations: acetone, 2-butanone, ethylbenzene, and
total xylenes. The highest VOC concentration detected at Site 2A was 0.047 mg/kg for acetone.
The SVOCs benzoic acid (3.8 mg/kg), bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate (0.13 mg/kg), and phenanthrene
(0.18 mg/kg) were each detected once in borings 2AB-03, 2AB-05, and 2AB-01, respectively.
Eight dioxin/furans were detected in the 5- and 10-foot samples from boring 2AB-05 at
concentrations of 0.001 mg/kg or less.
1,2,3,4,6,7,8-Heptachlorodibenzo-p-diosin (1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDD), 4,4'-DDE, 4,4'-DDT, and total
heptachlorodibenzo-p-dioxins (total HpCDD) exceeded PLEs in soil samples collected from
boring 2AB-05 during June 19%. The sampling conducted during May 1997 confirmed the
presence of these pesticides.
A total of 9 metals were detected at concentrations exceeding PRGs: antimony, arsenic,
beryllium, cadmium, copper, lead, manganese, thallium, and zinc. Although all arsenic detections
exceeded the PRO, the concentrations were at or near background. All beryllium concentrations
2-33
-------
were below the calculated background level. Antimony, cadmium, copper, lead, manganese
thallium, and zinc concentrations exceeded PRGs and background concentrations in samples from
bonng 2AB-05. In addition, the lead concentration for the 5-foot sample from boring 2AB-03
exceeded the PRO and background.
Concentrations of aluminum, antimony, barium, boron, cadmium, chromium, cobalt, copper iron
lead, manganese, mercury, molybdenum, nickel, silver, thallium, vanadium, and zinc exceeded '
FLBrin various boring locations. The maximum concentrations of these inorganic constituents
also exceeded background concentrations. Boring location 2AB-05 had the greatest number of
inorganic constituents with concentrations exceeding PLEs. The results for the surface samples
collected near boring location 2AB-05 in 1997 are similar to the results for soil samples collected
from the same location in June 1996.
2.43.4 Summary of Risks Associated with Slto2A
The HHRA was completed using data from the Phase 1 RI (SWDIV, 1997b) Because the
samples for the Phase 2 RI (SWDIV, 1998a) were collected from the same locations as Phase 1
samples and the results were similar for both phases, the HHRA was not revised. The EcoRA was
completed using both Phase 1 and Phase 2 results.
2.43.4.1 Human Health Risk Characterization
Based on the conceptual site model developed in the RI, current/future residents could be exposed
to sod contaminants through incidental ingestion, dermal contact, and inhalation of VOCs and
Peculates. Groundwater was not considered a complete exposure pathway for current/future
workers or residents. Data collected during the Group D RI were used for the risk assessment
The cancer risk and noncarcinogenic hazard for the residential and industrial/commercial scenarios
were evaluated using maximum detected contaminant concentrations in soils. Only the residential
scenario ,s summarized here because decisions for the site were based on this scenario The
cumulative residential risk is SxlQ-'and is attributable primarily to arsenic. Subtracting the
portion of total risk attributable to background metals, the ILCRs based on Region DC and
CayEPAPRGsare5.6xlO-andl.2xlO-J,respectively. The cumulative residential ffl is 150 The
primary hazard contributors are manganese, thallium, and zinc. Manganese and zinc
concentrations exceed background concentrations by more than three orders of magnitude.
SCtfl(W8/WPC/Peodleta/ROD10-27.wpd 2-34
-------
The highest detections of contaminants, driving both the cancer risk and the noncancer hazard,
were found at boring location 2AB-05, which is located in the adjacent burn area. Therefore, the
site was viewed as two separate areas, the grease disposal pit area and the burn area, and the risks
were reassessed.
The maximum concentrations for the grease disposal pit, excluding the samples from the bum area
at boring 2AB-05, were compared against EPA Region IX soil PRGs. The results were a
cumulative ILCR of 9.8x10* and an ffl of 1.8. The only contributors are arsenic and beryllium,
both of which are within the range of background concentrations. Subtracting the contribution
from background, the ILCR for the residential scenario using EPA Region DC and CaWEPA PRGs
arelessthan lxlO*and IxlO*. respectively. Theffiis 1.0. Based on this assessment, soil in the
grease disposal pit area is considered protective of human health. However, the area surrounding
boring 2AB-05 appears to present both an unacceptable carcinogenic risk and noncarcinogenic
hazard. The human health COCs in this area are 4,4'-DDD, 4,4'-DDE, antimony, arsenic,
cadmium, copper, lead, manganese, thallium, and zinc.
2,4.2.43 Ecological Risk Assessment
Vegetation at Site 2A burned during a bmshfire in June 1997. Most of the existing California
sagebrush series habitat and disturbed habitat were destroyed. Bird species observed prior to the
fire included cliff swallow, California quail, California towhee, and song sparrow. Mammals
observed included black-tail hare, cactus mouse, California mouse, deer mouse, desert woodrat,
dusky-footed woodrat, and house mouse. Surveys for the California gnatcatcher and the arroyo
toad, both special-status species, were conducted in May 1997, but none were observed. Surveys
conducted in 1996 identified least Bell's vireos, also a special-status species, in riparian vegetation
adjacent to the site. The representative species selected for evaluation at this site based on habitat
types present are plants, terrestrial invertebrates, California gnatcatcher, Belding's savannah
sparrow, California mouse, and deer mouse.
Concentrations of inorganic chemicals detected at Site 2A were compared against background
concentrations for the San Luis Rey Basin. Inorganic contaminants that exceeded background,
boron, and all organic contaminants detected were retained for the initial ecological risk screening.
Results of the initial ecological risk screening indicated that 18 inorganics, 2 organochlorine
pesticides, and 2 dioxin analytes had HQs exceeding 1.0.
2-35
-------
Biota tissue collected from plants, invertebrates, and mice were compared against reference
concentrations to evaluate adverse effects to ecological receptors due to bioaccumulation
Comparisons against reference concentrations for plants indicated that several metals are present
at concentrations exceeding reference samples. The plant tissue quotients for aluminum (1 9)
cobalt (1.2). iron (1.7), lead (1.7), molybdenum (1.3), and silver (1.3) are close to 1.0, indicating
only a slightly increased accumulation. Tissue quotients for copper (2.3), manganese (2.8), and
zinc (8.8) indicated that these chemicals are accumulating in plant tissue and could result in either
direct toxicity or food-chain transfer.
Comparisons against reference concentrations for invertebrates were similar to those for plants and
indicated that cadmium (1.04) and manganese (1.6) concentrations are similar to those for
reference invertebrates. Copper (2.7), lead (3). and zinc (2.1) are accumulating in invertebrates at
higher levels than in reference invertebrates and could result in either direct toxicity or food-chain
transfer.
Comparisons agamst reference concentrations for mice indicated that manga^se concentrations
slightly exceed reference values. The tissue quotient is very close to 1.0 (1.4), indicating a
relatively low potential increase in accumulation over reference levels.
For the final risk screening, COPECs with HQs greater man 1.0 were grouped into two areas of
concern based on sample locations where PLEs were exceeded for any representative species. The
PLEs for birds and mammals were then modified based on the size of the area of concern and the
foraging range for each representative species. Based on the modified PLEs, COPECs with HQs
exceeding 1.0 are aluminum, antimony, barium, boron, cadmium, chromium, cobalt, copper iron
lead, manganese, mercury, molybdenum, nickel, silver, thallium, vanadium, zinc, 4.4'-DDE, and '
*T»*T "
Qualitative factors such as habitat quality, severity of potential adverse effects, frequency of PLE
exceedances, frequency of detection, and uncertainty were used to evaluate COPECs further and
to select COECs. The following compounds were retained as COECs: antimony barium
cadmium, chromium, cobalt, copper, iron, lead, manganese, mercury, molybdenum, thallium,
silver, and zinc. Aluminum, nickel, vanadium, 4,4'-DDE, and M'-DOT were not retained based
on Qualitative faefnrc
on qualitative factors.
SCT10-98AVPanMdJwoTCODIO.27.wpd 2-36
-------
2.4.3 Description of Alternatives • Sites 1A, W, 1E, 1F, and 2A
As recommended by EPA guidance and the NCP (EPA, I989a and 1990b), acceptable
engineering practices that relate to site-specific conditions were considered during development of
the remedial action alternatives for Sites 1A. ID, IE, IF, and 2A. The selected alternatives satisfy
the requirements of 40 CFR 300.430(e), which specify that alternatives be developed to include no
action; institutional actions; little or no treatment alternatives; and alternatives that reduce toxicity,
mobility, or volume of contaminants.
Soils at OU3 Sites 1 A, ID, IE, IF, and 2A contain metals at concentrations that pose a potential
threat to human health and the environment and could potentially impact groundwater. The soils
that pose these potential risks are at depths of up to 10 feet below ground surface over areas
approximated using historical information, geophysical survey data, sample results, and natural
site boundaries. The remedial action objectives (RAOs) consist of media-specific goals for
protecting human health and the environment, including groundwater. RAOs generally consider
COCs, exposure pathways and receptors, and acceptable contaminant levels or range of levels for
each exposure route. In addition to being protective of human health and the environment, the
objective of the remedial action is to ensure that no further action is required in the future. The
remedial action goals for Sites 1A, ID, IE, IF, and 2A are listed in Table 2-1. The remedial
action goals are based on the human health, ecological, or background levels.
The following alternatives were developed for remediation of soil at Sites 1 A, ID, IE, IF, and 2 A:
• No action
• Excavation/removal and on-base disposal
• Excavation/removal and off-base disposal.
2.4.3.1 Alternative 1: No Action
The no action alternative provides no remediation, monitoring, or security activities at the sites to
reduce risk to human health or the environment. The NCP (40 CFR 300.430[e][6]) requires that
the no action response be carried through the detailed analysis of alternatives. This response
action is further evaluated as a baseline for comparison with other remedial alternatives developed
for contaminated soil.
SCI/l-98/WPOPendteo/ROD12199.wpd 2-37
-------
2.4.3.2 Alternative 2: Excavation/Removal and On-Bass Disposal I
This alternative includes removal of contaminated soils via mechanical excavation. Upon >—•'
removal, the impacted soils from Sites 1 A, ID, IE, IF, and 2A would be transported to Site 7 -
Box Canyon Landfill, which is a designated corrective action management unit (CAMU). The
process for CAMU designation is described in Appendix B, and was also included in the OU3
RI/FS (SWDFV, 1998a) and OU3 proposed plan for public review.
Heavy earthmoving equipment such as track-mounted excavators, bulldozers, graders, and front-
end loaders will be used to remove impacted soils. For excavations greater than 2 feet deep,
excavation sidewalk will be maintained at an approximate 2:1 (horizontal-vertical) engineered
slope. Maintenance of the side slopes will provide stability and reduce the need for shoring.
During inactive periods, excavation and stockpile areas will be secured with barrier tape and
warning signs will be posted. Potential exposure and protection procedures for site workers will
be addressed in the site-specific health and safety plan. Risks associated with exposure of site
personnel to dust emissions and direct contact with impacted soil during excavation will be
minimized by spraying water on stockpiled soil and the excavation areas, using appropriate
personal protective equipment (PPE), and observing proper decontamination procedures. Detailed
field procedures for management and maintenance of open excavation areas and temporary storage
stockpiles will be provided in the remedial design documents. "—
The impacted soil will be loaded onto dump trucks for disposal at Site 7 - Box Canyon Landfill.
All loads will be covered with a secured tarp to prevent fugitive dust emissions during transport.
Because volatile compounds are not of primary concern, any potential risk to the public in case of
a traffic accident would involve release of particulates and dust and/or physical injuries.
Following completion of excavation to the target depths, confirmation sampling will be performed
for CLP metals analysis to meet remedial action standards for soil specified in Table 2-1. For
costing purposes in the FS, the confirmation sampling frequency was estimated at one sample per
10,000 square feet; this frequency will be finalized during remedial design in accordance with the
EPA Guidance Methods for Evaluating the Attainment of Cleanup Standards, Volume I: Soils and
Media, PB89-234959. Clean fill will then be obtained from a suitable nearby source and
transported to the site for backfilling, compaction, and grading. The site will be graded to original
contours to the extent possible, and the final grade will be confirmed via land surveying. The site
will then be revegetated to restore habitat and limit erosion.
SCI/1.98/WPOPr»B<*yRODl2l99.wpd 2-38 ~—'
-------
The time to complete this alternative varies for each df the six sites based on the volume of
contaminated soil. This alternative would be completed in approximately 10 weeks for Site 1 A,
9 weeks for Sites 1A and IF, 6 weeks for Site 2A, and 3 weeks for Site IE.
2.4.3.3 Alternative 3: Excavation/Removal and Off-Base Disposal
This alternative involves excavation of contaminated soil, transportation to an off-base disposal
facility, and backfilling of the excavated area using clean imported soil. All of the components of
this alternative are identical to Alternative 2 with the exception of the disposal location.
For costing purposes in the FS, excavated soil is expected to be managed as hazardous waste and
would require Class I landfill disposal because total metals concentrations exceed 20 times the
toxicity characteristic leaching potential (TCLP) criteria. Leachability testing is planned prior to
disposal. Excavated soils will be transported off base to an approved hazardous waste facility.
The Kettleman Hills landfill, a hazardous waste landfill operated by Waste Management, Inc., in
King County, California, was selected as the probable disposal facility. The contaminated soil
would be transported in covered trucks on interstate highway systems. The Kettleman Hills
landfill is approximately 250 miles north of MCB Camp Pendleton and 55 miles south of Fresno,
California. The route to the landfill is along Interstate 5, which passes through central Orange
County, the Los Angeles metropolitan area, and the northwestern part of Los Angeles County.
The route continues through western portions of Kern and Kings Counties.
Confirmation sampling and backfilling of clean imported soil will be performed in the same
manner as for Alternative 2. Safeguards, measures, and management and maintenance procedures
discussed for Alternative 2 will also be implemented for this remedial action alternative. The time
frames to complete cleanup for each site varies based on soil volumes and would be greater than
described for Alternative 2 due largely to the greater transportation distances involved. Time
frames are approximately 20 weeks for Site ID, 18 weeks for Site IF, 16 weeks for Site 1 A, 10
weeks for Site 2A, and 4 weeks for Site IE
2.4.4 Summary of Comparative Analysis of Alternatives • Sites 1A, W, 1E, 1F,
This section summarizes the comparison of alternatives based on the nine evaluation criteria
provided in the NCR The nine criteria are grouped into three categories: threshold criteria,
2-39
-------
primary balancing criteria, and modifying criteria. The evaluation is the same for Sites 1 A, ID,
IE, IF, and 2A and the summary, therefore, applies to each of the five sites.
2.4.4.1 Threshold Criteria
These two criteria relate directly to statutory findings that must ultimately be made in the ROD;
selected alternatives must meet these criteria.
2.4.4.1.1 Overall Protection of Human Health and the Environment
The no action alternative includes no treatment and no control of exposure pathways. The
contaminated soil would be left in place. Under this alternative, the potential long-term risks
would be the same as those calculated in the baseline HHRA and EcoRA. This alternative is not
protective of human health and the environment and does not prevent potential leaching of soil
contamination to groundwater.
Alternatives 2 and 3 would provide protection of human health and the environment by removing
and disposing of contaminated soils in on-base or off-base facilities. The excavated areas would
be backfilled with clean soil under both alternatives. Both alternatives would eliminate the threat
to groundwater because the contaminated soil would be removed and could not leach to
groundwater at the sites.
2.4.4.13 Compliance with ARARs
No applicable or relevant and appropriate requirements (ARARs) were identified for Alternative 1,
since no action is taken. Both Alternatives 2 and 3 comply with ARARs. On-site disposal under
Alternative 2 is La compliance with RCRA CAMU requirements because the excavated soil would
be placed at Site 7 - Box Canyon Landfill, a designated CAMU (Appendix B). Soil would be
screened using the designated level methodology (DIM) to model teachability and DI WET
teachability testing would be conducted as required to comply with groundwater ARARs for
Site 7. The excavation for Alternatives 2 and 3 would meet Federal and State endangered species
ARARs. Mitigation could be required for some of the sites after consultation with the U.S. Fish
and Wildlife Service. Excavation and transportation of soil to Site 7 would comply with San
Diego Air Pollution Control District (APCD) ARARs by limiting fugitive dust emissions using
engineering controls.
2-40
-------
2.4.43 Primary Balancing Criteria
These criteria represent the primary criteria upon which the analysis is based and take into account
technical, cost, institutional, and risk concerns.
2.4.43.1 Long-Term Effectiveness and Permanence
The risks associated with the Alternative 1 - No Action were evaluated in the baseline HHRA and
the EcoRA (SWDIV, 1997b and 1998). Alternative 1 would not provide additional actions or
controls to reduce existing contaminant concentrations and the associated risks to human health
and the environment As a result, the reliability and adequacy of such actions or controls cannot
be assessed. In addition, Alternative 1 would leave contaminated material undisturbed at the site.
Therefore, Alternative 1 provides no long-term effectiveness and permanence.
Alternatives 2 and 3 would enhance long-term effectiveness through permanent removal of
contaminated soil from the sites, resulting in adequate and reliable reduction of exposure pathways
and potential human health and ecological risks. Alternatives 2 and 3 would satisfy all RAOs,
including the objective for no future action at the site following implementation of the remedial
action. AnyremainingdetectionsofCOCsorCOECswouldbebelowacceptablelevelsfor
human health and ecological risks. Alternatives 2 and 3 would provide a high degree of long-term
effectiveness and permanence.
Reduction of Toxlclty, Mobility, and Volume Through Treatment
Alternatives 1, 2, and 3 do not entail on-site treatment of contaminated soil. Accordingly, no
reduction in toxicity, mobility, or volume would occur due to treatment.
2.4.43.3 Short-Term Effectiveness
No remedial actions would be implemented under Alternative 1 and, therefore, effectiveness
during implementation cannot be evaluated
Potential exposure and protection procedures for workers during implementation of Alternatives 2
and 3 would be addressed in the site-specific health and safety plan. Risks associated with
exposure of site personnel and nearby receptors to dust emissions and direct contact with
contaminated soil during excavation would be rflinimized using dust suppressants and appropriate
PPE. v
SCUICMa/WPC/PnKU«
-------
Heavy equipment operated at the OU3 sites would conform with California Occupational Safety
and Health Administration (Cal/OSHA, 1979) specifications and would be operated only by
authorized, trained personnel. Traffic accidents associated with routine driving on base roads
could occur during transport of soil off base or to Site 7. If a traffic accident were to occur, the
risk to the public would be from exposure to dust from contaminated soil, in addition to the risk of
physical harm due to the accident.
Environmental impacts to threatened or endangered species or migratory birds would be minimal.
Only small portions of currently undisturbed habitat would be impacted during implementation of
Alternatives 2 and 3, and the sites would be revegetated upon completion of remedial activities.
The time required for completion of Alternative 2 varies from 3 to 10 weeks based on the volume
of soil at each site; the time required for completion of Alternative 3 ranges from 4 to 20 weeks.
2.4.4.2.4 implemantabllity
No implementability concerns are posed by Alternative 1 because no action would be taken.
For Alternatives 2 and 3, excavation and disposal of contaminated soil at an existing on-base or
off-base facility is readily implementable and several vendors are available. Alternative 2, on-base
disposal, would be easier to implement because the transportation distance is less than for
Alternative 3. Equipment, materials, and labor for both Alternatives 2 and 3 are available.
2.4.43.5 Cost
No cost is associated with Alternative 1 - No Action. The cost for Alternative 2 is lower than the
cost for Alternative 3 for each of the five sites.
Site
1A
1D
1E
IF
2A
Altwnathwa
(mHMons)
$1.3
$1.4
$0.1
$1.5
$0.7
AttM1MtfV»3
(mllHona)
$8.2
$10.4
$1.0
$9.4
$4.6
Sd/10-9S/WKVPeodle«a/ROD10-27.wpd
2-42
-------
2.4.4.3 Modifying Criteria
Modifying criteria include State and community acceptance and were evaluated following the
comment period for the FS and the proposed plan.
2.4.4.3.1 State Acceptance
The Cal/EPA San Diego RWQCB and DTSC have approved the OU3 RI/FS and proposed plan
and agree with the selection of Alternative 2 as the preferred alternative for Sites 1A, ID, IE, IF,
and2A.
2.4.4.3.2 Community Acceptance
A public meeting was held on 14 May 1998 to present the preferred alternative to the public. No
comments were received during the public meeting or public comment period.
2.4.5 Selected Remedy for OU3 Sites 1A, W, 1E, IF, and 2A
The selected remedy for OU3 Sites 1 A, ID, IE, IF, and 2A is Alternative 2: Excavation/
Removal and On-Base Disposal. Soil will be excavated and transported to Site 7 (Box Canyon
landfill) for disposal.
The full description of Alternative 2 is presented in Section 2.4.3.2. The approximate areas of
excavation are delineated in Figures 2-6 through 2-10. The excavation areas are based on sample
results, physical attributes of the site, geophysical surveys conducted at the sites, and historical
aerial surveys. The area designations are dashed where there are no sample data representing
levels below remedial goals. Excavation depths range from 3 to 10 feet as shown in Figures 2-6
through 2-10. The estimated volumes of soil to be removed from each site are listed below:
Sit©
1A
ID
IE
IF ,
2A
Estimated Excavated
Soil Volume
(cubic yards)
31,700
40.000
4,000
36,300
17,700
SCV10-9g/WPOPeodie*a/RODIO-27.wpd
2-43
-------
Additional data was collected in May 1998 as part of the preconstniction effort to refine the extent
of contamination. While estimated boundaries and volumes of soils to be excavated changed for
individual sites, based on the additional data, the combined site soil volume remained essentially
the same. Results arc provided in the Energy Dispersive X-ray Fluorescence Field Investigation
Report, dated 5 August 1998. The additional data results will be incorporated into the remedial
design report for these sites.
The excavation strategy for each site is to minimize the excavation depth while meeting the
remedial objectives. In areas driven by ecological risk only, the maximum excavation depth will
be 5 feet During the site restoration phase, this area will be covered with a minimum of 5 feet of
clean soil to eliminate future risk of ecological exposure to any residual contamination remaining
below a 5-foot depth. The same strategy will apply to areas driven by human health risks. The
maximum excavation depth will be limited to 10 feet The area will be backfilled with a minimum
of 10 feet of clean soil if contaminant concentrations at 10 feet still exceed remedial goals.
The excavated soil will be transported to Site 7 - Box Canyon Landfill, which has been designated
as a CAMU for these remedial actions. The Site 7 landfill has been inactive since May 1984. A
removal action has been implemented at Site 7 for a phased installation of a landfill cap. The
second phase of the landfill cap was designed to use the excavated soil from the OU3 sites as part
ofthefill(SWDIV, 1997c). The CAMU designation of Site 7 was publicly reviewed as part of the
OU3 proposed plan. The criteria, as specified in 40 CFR 264.552(c), and rationale for designation
£.11 .
follow:
The CAMU shall facilitate the implementation of reliable, effective, protective, and
cost-effective corrective action measures.
The use of Site 7 as a CAMU for the disposal of excavated soil from OU3 sites is a
reliable, effective, and protective remedy. A landfill cap will be placed over the
excavated soil to limit mobilization of contaminants and rninimize potential exposure.
The use of Site 7 as a CAMU is more cost-effective than other alternatives evaluated
such as off-site disposal.
Waste management activities associated with the CAMU shall not create unacceptable
risks to humans or to the environment resulting from exposure to hazardous wastes,
hazardous substances, or hazardous constituents.
SCtfl(W8WPQPend]«c/ROD10.27.wj>d 2-44
-------
^
remedial actioa sites and the landfill cap will be placed over thxcavatedil.
2-45
-------
• The CAMU shall, to the extent practicable, minimize the land area of the facility upon
which wastes will remain in place after closure of the CAMU.
The consolidation of soil wastes from OU3 sites at Site 7 will aid in minimizing the
land area of MCB Camp Pendleton upon which wastes will remain in place.
Additional information regarding the CAMU designation of Site 7 is provided in Appendix B.
Costs for the selected alternatives for the OU3 sites are as follows:
Site
1A
ID
IE
IF
2A
Cost for Removal/Excavation
and On-Base Disposal
(millions) ^^
$1.3
$1.4
$0.1
$1.5
$0.7
Groundwater at OU3 Sites 1 A, ID, IE, IF, and 2A was recommended for no further action in the
Group C and Group D RI reports (SWDIV, 1996a and 1997b). Excavation of contaminated soil at
these sites will eliminate the potential for soil contaminants to leach to groundwater. Based on the
DLM, excavated soil from Sites 1 A, ID, IE, and IF will not have the potential to impact
groundwater at Site 7 (SWDIV, 1998a). Soil from Site 2A exceeded the designated levels,
although only slightly; therefore, the soil from Site 2A was tested for leachability using DI WET
analysis. The DI WET results were compared against a soluble designated level predicted by the
DLM. DI WET results were less than the soluble designated levels, indicating that Site 2A soils
would not pose a threat to groundwater (SWDFV. 1998b). Additional detail regarding potential
teachability of Sites I A, ID. IE, IF, and 2A soils is presented in the technical memorandum dated
2 October 1998 (SWDIV, 1998c).
2.4.6 Statutory Determinations
This section discusses how the selected remedy for Sites 1A, ID, IE, IF, and 2A meets the
statutory requirements of CERCLA Section 121. Under CERCLA Section 121. the selected
remedy at a Superfund site must entail remedial actions that achieve adequate protection of human
health and the environment In addition, CERCLA Section 121 establishes several other statutory
SCinO-98/WPC/PendleuVRODl0.27.wpd
2-46
-------
requirements and preferences specifying that, when complete, the selected remedial action must
comply with ARARs established under Federal and State environmental laws unless a statutory
waiver is justified. The selected remedy must also be cost-effective and must entail permanent
solutions and alternative treatment technologies or resource recovery technologies to the maximum
extent practicable. Finally, the statute includes a preference for remedies that employ, as their
principal element, treatment technologies that permanently and significantly reduce the volume,
toxicity, or mobility of hazardous wastes.
2.4.6.1 Protection of Human Health and the Environment
Under current conditions, human health risks associated with Sites 1A, ID, IE, IF. and 2A are
within the EPA cancer risk management range of 10"* to 10"*; however, the npncancer HQ for
humans is greater than 1.0 for each site and lead exceeds acceptable criteria set by the EPA and
DTSC for most sites. The risk to ecological receptors also exceeds acceptable levels. The selected
remedy was chosen because soil contamination will be reduced to acceptable levels for both
human and ecological receptors. Removal of contaminated soil will also eliminate the potential for
migration of soil contaminants to groundwater. The potential risk for workers implementing the
remedial actions for these five sites will be addressed in a site-specific health and safety plan.
2.4.6-2 Compliance with Applicable or Relevant and Appropriate Requirements
The selected remedy will comply with all Federal and State ARARs. The ARARs for
Alternative 2 at Sites 1A, ID, IE, IF, and 2A are discussed in Appendix B.
2.4.6.3 Cost-Effectiveness
The selected remedy was evaluated for cost-effectiveness in comparison with the other two
alternatives. The no action alternative is less expensive taan the selected alternative but does not
reduce risk at the sites to acceptable levels. The selected alternative is the least expensive
alternative that will be protective of human health and the environment and comply with ARARs.
2.4.6.4 Urn of Permanent Solutions and Alternative Treatment Technologies t&
the Extent Practicable
The selected remedy uses permanent solutions and treatment technologies to the maximum extent
possible for Sites 1A, ID, IE, IF, and 2A. Because of the nature and concentration of
contaminants, treatment was not found to be a practical solution. However, capping will reduce
the mobility of contaminants by reducing infiltration.
Sa/IO-98/WFC/PcodkttVROD10-27.wpd 2-47
-------
The selected alternative provides the best balance between effectiveness and cost of the three
alternatives considered with respect to the five EPA balancing criteria (Le., long-term
effectiveness; reduction of toxicity, mobility, or volume through treatment; short-term
effectiveness; implementability; and cost).
Alternative 1 would leave contaminated soil in place. The selected alternative and Alternative 3
both provide a high degree of long-term effectiveness and permanence because contaminated soil
would be removed. Under the selected alternative the contaminated soil will be excavated, placed
into a CAMU, and covered with an engineered cap.
None of the alternatives would reduce mobility, toxicity, or volume of the waste because treatment
was found to be neither practical nor feasible. Treatment technologies evaluated were not
considered teasible because they did not meet RAOs. were energy-intensive and costly, or were
not effective for the COCs. The selected alternative was the greatest short-term effectiveness.
Although excavation and earthmoving activities are the same for Alternatives 2 and 3, potential
exposure during implementation is greater for Alternative 3 because transportation distances and
implementation schedules are longer.
Alternative 2 is slightly easier to implement than Alternative 3. Alternative 3 includes longer
transportation distances and compliance with permitting requirements for off-base disposal.
For each of the five sites, Alternative 2 is less expensive than Alternative 3. Because
Alternatives 2 and 3 arc considered approximately equal with regard to three of the other four
balancing criteria, the least costly alternative has been selected.
2.5 Remedial Action Selected torStte 7- Box Canyon Landfill
2.5.1 Site Name, Location, and Description - Site 7
Site 7 - Box Canyon Landfill is located near the southwest corner of the base in 20 Area to the east
of Vandegrift Boulevard less than a mile northeast of Stuart Mesa Road (Figure 2-11).
The inactive landfill covers an area of approximately 28 acres. The majority of Box Canyon in
which landfilling activities were conducted has been filled with landfill material to the surface of
the surrounding marine terrace, which is approximately 140 feet above the Santa Margarita
SOTKMSAVPOPendlttortlODio.27.wpd 2-48
-------
riverbed. Near the canyon entrance, the landfill slopes steeply down to the north and terminates
approximately 1,000 feet from the Santa Margarita River.
2.53 Site History and Enforcement Activities
The site was used for quarry operations from approximately 1946 to 1970. The site began Class
m landfill operations in May 1974 which ended in 1984. The landfill has been inactive since
1984. Typical wastes accepted for landfilling reportedly included household and construction
refuse consisting of tree and lawn clippings, scrap lumber and metal, appliances, furniture, paper,
fill, dirt, asphalt, concrete, tile, cans, containers, magazines, and boxes. The site also reportedly
received dry cleaning sludges containing stoddard solvent; contaminated soil and dumpster waste
containing fuels, POLs, solvents, thinners, strippers, epoxies, sealants, paint wastes, and chemical
cleaners.
Based on the nature of wastes disposed at Site 7, a removal action to cap the landfill following the
EPA Presumptive Remedy guidance (EPA, 1993) was proposed in the Group B RI (SWDIV,
1995b). Because of the large volume and heterogeneity of the contents of municipal landfills,
treatment usually is impracticable and the EPA considers containment to be the appropriate
response action, or the presumptive remedy, for the source areas of municipal landfill sites.
An engineering evaluation/cost analysis (EE/CA) was prepared to evaluate closure of Site 7
(SWDIV, 1995d). An addendum to the EE/CA was prepared in 1997 to evaluate an additional cap
option (SWDIV, 1997c). Capping alternatives were evaluated as discussed in Section 2.5.5.
Since Site 7 is a landfill and the presumptive remedy approach was used in the EE/CA, the level of
detail provided in the EE/CA is considered adequate to meet the requirements of an FS, and is
used as such for this ROD. Phase 1 of the cap was completed in October 1997. Phase 2 is
planned to coincide with disposal of soils from the OU3 remedial action sites.
2.5.3 Summary of Stt9 Characteristics
The initial RI work at Site 7 was conducted during March 1993 through March of 1994. Four soil
samples were collected from the surface of the landfill and one soil sample was collected from the
surface just outside the northwest edge of the landfill (Figure 2-11). Soil samples were analyzed
for VOCs, SVOCs, gasoline, diesel, pesticides, PCBs, and herbicides. Twenty new groundwater
monitoring wells were installed and sampled at Site 7. Three groundwater monitoring wells
installed during a previous investigation at the site were also sampled (Figure 2-11). Three rounds
SCV10-9SAVPOPtndietaAODta.27.wpd 2-49
-------
of groundwater monitoring were conducted during the initial RL Samples were analyzed for
metals, VOCs, SVOCs, gasoline, diesel, pesticides, PCBs, herbicides, and general chemistry.
Three additional rounds of groundwater sampling of the 23 wells were conducted between June
,1994 and July 1995. An ecological survey was conducted to identify potential special-status
species habitats and trappings were conducted to determine presence of the Pacific pocket mouse.
No special-status species were identified at Site 7. Samples were analyzed for metals, VOCs,
SVOCs, gasoline, diesel, pesticides, PCBs, herbicides, and general chemistry.
A 24-hour meteorological survey was conducted on 8 and 9 September 1993. Based on the results
of the meteorological survey, four 24-hour ambient air samples were collected from 9 to
10 September 1993. Ambient air and air traps (e.g., stairwells, crawl spaces, confined spaces,
vents and vaults) were sampled for methane and hydrogen sulfide.
The results of the initial RI at Site 7 are reported in the Group B RI report (SWDIV, 1995b). The
results of additional sampling and surveys are presented in the technical addendum to the Group B
RI report (SWDIV, 1996c). These results are summarized in the following sections.
2.5.3.1 Geology and Hydrogeology
This section summarizes the geology and hydrogeology for Site 7 from the Group B RI (SWDFV,
1996c). Five distinct geologic units were encountered during the RI at Site 7. These are, from
youngest to oldest, the younger alluvium of the Santa Margarita River, Pleistocene marine terrace
deposits, the Plio-Pleistocene San Mateo Formation, post-mid-Miocene/pre-Pleistocene sandy and
gravelly alluvial deposits, and the mid-Miocene San Onofre Breccia.
The San Onofre Breccia is unconformably overlain by Pleistocene terrace deposits on the west
side of the landfill and by the sandy and gravelly alluvial deposits on the north and east sides of the
landfill. Field measurements indicate that the San Onofre Breccia strikes to the northwest and
dips 10 to 15 degrees to the southwest
The San Onofre Breccia is not expected to contain or transmit substantial quantities of
groundwater (Palmer, 1990). Although this formation is considered an aquitard because of its
poor sorting and high percentage of fine-grained materials (Palmer, 1990), two aquifers were
encountered in the lower member of the San Onofre Breccia. No significant groundwater was
observed in the upper member of the San Onofre Breccia.
Sa/!04SWPOPea
-------
The sandy and gravelly alluvium unconfonnably overlies the San Onofre Breccia and has several
characteristics that make it a potential preferential pathway for leachate migration from the Box
Canyon landfill. Thus, leachate from the Box Canyon landfill could potentially migrate
downgradient through the sandy and gravelly alluvium to the Santa Margarita Basin.
The Plio-Pleistocene San Mateo Formation is exposed in cliffs along Ash Road, approximately
1,500 feet southwest of the Box Canyon landfill, and unconfonnably overlies the San Onofre
Breccia. The contact between the two units is concealed. This unit was not encountered during
well installation or soil sampling activities; it is offset by a normal fault that may be related to
other faults in the vicinity of Site 7.
The Pleistocene marine terrace deposits unconfonnably overlie the San Onofre Breccia on the
south, west, and north sides of the Box Canyon landfill and the sandy and gravelly alluvium on the
east side of the landfill.
The younger alluvium was encountered only in the wells installed in the Santa Margarita Basin,
adjacent to the Box Canyon landfill. The alluvium thickens northward and westward toward the
Santa Margarita River (away from the landfill).
Evidence of at least two sets of faults was observed in the vicinity of Site 7. One set strikes
northeast, and the other strikes northwest The evidence of faulting includes offset bedding, drag
folding, slickensides, fault gouge, and liiteations in aerial photographs.
Monitoring wells at Site 7 were installed io three geologic units having distinct hydrogeologic
characteristics: Pleistocene marine terrace deposits, San Onofre Breccia Formation, and sandy
and gravelly alluvium.
The Pleistocene marine terrace deposits are generally restricted to the uppermost 60 feet of strata
and do not appear to act as a separate aquifer. These deposits locally may act as a perched aquifer,
however, the presence of sandstone and cobble conglomerate (at the base of the deposits) probably
allows percolation of surface waters to the underlying formations.
Nine groundwater monitoring wells were installed in the San Onofre Breccia Formation.
Groundwater was encountered in two distinct zones: a shallow zone that extends from 110 to
SC^lO-W/WKVPendfcayRODHMT.wpd 2-51
-------
150 feet below grade, and a deep zone that extends from approximately 150 to 190 feet below
grade. The two saturated zones appear to be separated by an aquitard of variable thickness and
moisture content (dry to moist).
Six groundwater monitoring wells were installed in the sandy and gravelly alluvium. Groundwater
was first encountered within the alluvium at depths of approximately 144 and 160 feet below
ground surface and was found to be continuous to at least 220 feet in wells 7W-03 and 7W-06C
In monitoring wells 7W-08B and 7W-08C, the sandy and gravelly alluvium extends from
approximately 45 to 1 17 feet below ground surface and, again, appears to be a continuous aquifer.
No confining zones or changes in water content were observed during drilling, which further
indicates that the alluvium acts as one continuous aquifer. The unit is expected to be highly
permeable because of its relatively coarse overall grain size and low percentage of fine grains.
Groundwater recharged through the sandy and gravelly all
uvium near well cluster 7W433 would
and gravelly alluvium near well cluster 7W-06 suggests that a pathway may exist for leachate
migration from the landfill toward the Santa Margarita River. The planned cover will minimize
the potential for rainfall infiltration and the generation of leachate at concentrations above
acceptable criteria.
Five groundwater monitoring wells were installed in the alluvium of the Santa Margarita Basin
Groundwater was encountered 12 to 21 feet below ground surface. Observations during drilling
and aquifer testing indicate that the alluvium acts as a continuous aquifer from an elevation of
10 feet msl to its intersection with consolidated bedrock. This depth varies and generally increases
with distance (to the north) from the marine terrace.
as
The groundwater flow direction at the site is southwest to northwest. The hydraulic gradient,
determined from water levels measured on 20 April 1994 and 21 August 1995, ranges from
approximately 0.076 ft/ft northwest of the landfill to approximately 0.40 ft/ft southwest of the
landfill.
The direction of the horizontal hydraulic gradient in the deeper water-bearing units generally is
similar to that of the first-encountered groundwater, with the exception of the area in the vicinity
SO/IO-WWPCypeodkttVRODKWT.wpd 2-52
-------
of well 7W-11. Site 7 lies within a recharge area, as indicated by lower head readings in deep
monitoring wells compared with shallow wells.
2.5.33 Soil Results
Soil sample locations are shown in Figure 2-11. Low concentrations (ranging from approximately
10 to 100 ug/kg) of several polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon (PAH) compounds were detected in
sample 07SD004. Two other organics, toluene and bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate were detected in
four of the five surface soil samples. Toluene was detected at a concentration of 1J ug/kg in
samples 07SD002-LABQC and 07SD005. Bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate concentrations ranged from
150J to 1.800B ug/kg.
2.5.3.3 Groundwater Results
Figure 2-11 presents groundwater analytical results for organic contaminants detected at
concentrations exceeding MCLs or PRGs in at least one Site 7 well. The figure also presents the
.brcakdown-product^associated with these organies even though-they did not exceeditf GLs or
PRGs. Metals were all below background and/or MCLs during the last four quarters of
monitoring. Therefore, no inorganics are shown hi the figure.
Groundwater analytical results for the RI are briefly described below:
• 1,2-DCA was detected during the second quarter 1993 above the MCL in one well,
7W-1 IB, at 2.0J ug/I. The MCL for 1,2-DCA is at the detection limit, 0.5 fig/1. 1,2-
DCA was detected iis 7W-11C during the third quarter 1993 at 0.5 ugfl and in well
7W-11A during the first quarter 1994 at 0.6 fig/1. It was detected in wells TW-l 1 A,
7W-1 IB and 7W-11C during the fourth quarter 1994 at 0.7,1.0, and 0.6 jig/1,
respectively. 1,2-DCA was not detected in any of these three wells during the first and
second quarters 1995.
• 1,2-DCA was detected in well 7W-06A in a duplicate sample during the fourth quarter
1994 at 0.5 ug/1 but not in the two subsequent rounds of sampling. It was not detected
in the other well of the 2-well cluster, 7W-06B.
PCE was detected below its MCL (5 ug/i) in well 7W-06A during the second and third
quarters 1993 and during the first and fourth quarters 1994 at 1.0,2.0,2.0, and
1.0 ug/I, respectively. It was not detected in subsequent quarters in well 7W-06A or in
the other well of the 2-well cluster, 7W-06B.
2-53
-------
PCE was not detected in well 7W-1 1C. It was detected in wells 7W-11 A and
-cond quarters 1995 at 1.5, 1.2, 1.0, 1.0, 1.0. and
1 ,1-DCA was detected below its MCL (5.0 ug/1) in wells
, and 7W-1 1C dunng the first and fourth quarters 1994 and the first
and second quarters 1995 at amaximum concentration of 3
(5-° Mg/1) * itS "^^^ ^^ntration in well
r 1990 but was not detected durine six
MCL <5-
.
7W-07d,,rin ,h ' r r 7W-11C. II was only detected once at 3.0 Mg/l in
was detected in well 7W-1 1 A during the second and third quarters 1990 the first and
uarrs
quarters 1994, and the first quarter 1995 at 2.0, 1.6,2.S.
~M*a* ** imd quarter 1995/ ^ *as etected
, but was not detected during five subsequent quarters.
u
since in at least three quarters after each detection.
1,4-dichlorobenzene was detected below its MCL (5 ug/I)
quarter 1994 and the first quarter 1995 at 0.5 and 2.0^
not been detected
«w««ea
2-54
-------
detected during the second quarter 1995. It was also detected in well 7W-1 IB during
the first and second quarters 1995 at 2.0, and 0.6 ug/l.
Dibromochlorometnane, U-dichlorobenzene, bromodichloromethane, phenol, benzoic
acid, bromoform, and chloromethane were detected once or twice in the last four
quarters of groundwater sampling but did not exceed MCLs or did not have MCLs.
The maximum detected concentrations were 2.0,0.6,3.0,19,5.0,3.0, and 5 0 ug/1
respectively.
Antimony, barium, chromium, manganese, molybdenum, nickel, selenium, thallium,
and vanadium were detected at maximum concentrations that exceeded upgradient '
background concentrations. However, the 95 percent upper confidence limit of the
mean site concentrations of these metals did not exceed background except for barium.
The maximum concentrations of other metals detected were less than background.
There was no background for antimony or thallium available. Barium was detected in
48 of 85 groundwater samples at Site 7. The maximum barium concentration was
362 ug/1 which is less than its MCL (1,000 ug/1). Antimony was detected in 2 of 85
groundwater samples. It was detected at 13.3 ug/1 in wells 7W-4A and 7W-5A during
the second quarter of 1993. The detected antimony concentrations exceed the MCL
(6 ug/1). Antimony was not detected during the last four quarters of sampling in 1994
and 1995. Thallium was detected in 4 of 85 groundwater samples. The maximum
thallium concentration was 26 ug/1 which exceeds its MCL (2 ug/1). All other
detections were less than the MCL. Thallium was not detected during the last four
quarters of sampling in 1994 and 1995.
Nitrate was detected at a concentration exceeding its MCL (10 ug/1) only once in an
upgradient well 7W-OIA during the first quarter 1994 at 14.3 ug/1.
2.5.3.4 Ambient Air and Soil G$s Results
Ambient air monitoring consisted of a 24-hour meteorological survey of wind speed and direction,
collection of 24-hour ambient air samples, and direct testing of hydrogen sulfide and methane
concentrations. Four soil-gas samples were collected, in duplicate, at the Santa Margarita School
and the Wire Mountain Housing Area. The presence of an impenetrable caliche-type soil layer
limited sampling depths to 1.5 feet instead of the proposed 3 to 6 feet. The areal extent of the
caliche layer is not well defined. Based on the four soil-vapor sample locations, it may extend
about 800 feet in a north/south direction. This unit could act as a capping layer that would restrict
the upward migration of soil vapors.
2-55
-------
Air sampling results are summarized below:
o
ers were placed at the Box Canyon landfill in accordance with
' 7 1CVelS (1'2 to 2'° «*> °f M-'-TCA were detected in all four
° '•'1-70* in *» "Pwind sa«Ptes indicates that the landfill is
c°mpoum- * s difficult to detennine *"
R .
Howcv<*. sampling locations were relatively close to roads and
develo d areas
No halogenated volatile compounds were detected in the soil-gas samples. Complete analytical
results for the soil-gas samples are presented in Appendix G of the technical memorandum for
Group B sites (SWDIV, 1993d).
2.5 A Summary of Site Risks - S/te 7
2.5.4.1 Human Health Risk Characterization
The HHRA for Site 7 soil was an interim screening assessment because of the planned capping of
the landfill; capping of this landfill began in 1997, and Phase I was completed 17 November 1997
PAH compounds in one sample, 07SD004, were the primary contributors to risk and resulted in a
maximum total site-related risk (residential scenario) of IxKT'for soil at Site 7. No individual
PAH exceeded the incremental lifetime cancer risk QLCR) of lxlO-*for ingestion, and
benzo(a)Pyrene toxicity values were used for PAH compounds of probable lesser toxicity. Tne
total maximum hazard index (HI) for soil was less than the target criterion of 1.0. Because of the
small number of soil samples collected and the placement of the landfill cap, no further risk
assessment evaluation was conducted for Site 7 soil.
The landfill material is assumed to be contaminated and sampling of the fill material was not
conducted consistent with the EPA presumptive remedy guidance. The site was investigated to
detenmne the potential for off-site gas migration and the potential impact to groundwater during
the remedial investigation. The potential for gas migration was determined not to be a concern
based on results of air monitoring at the site and at the neighboring residential area and elementary
school.
2-56
-------
There were groundwater contaminants detected intermittently in some of the 23 monitoring wells
at the site. The noncancer hazard index was 3.2 due to antimony (1.7 HQ) and thallium (1.4 HQ).
Neither thallium nor antimony were detected during the latest 2 rounds of sampling. The main
contributors to the groundwater cancer risk were 1,2-dichlorocthane (1,2-DGA), tetrachloroethene,
and trichloroethene. The cancer risk was calculated to be within the risk management range
(IxlQ-3). The results of the latest 2 rounds of sampling (first and second quarter of 1995) were
nondetect for 1,2-DCA and the other risk contributors were less than their MCLs. The risk/hazard
for groundwater is within the NCP risk management range and is determined to be acceptable.
2.5.4.2 Ecological Risk Assessment
No ecological risk assessment was conducted for Site 7 because no special-status species or
habitat were identified and a landfill cap was planned to be installed.
2.5.5 Description of Alternatives - Site 7
The landfill presumptive remedy approach was used to assess alternatives for Site 7. The
components of the landfill presumptive remedy include: a landfill cap, source area groundwater
control to contain the plume, leachate collection and treatment, landfill gas collection and
treatment, and institutional controls.
An EE/CA was prepared to evaluate capping options for Site 7 (SWDIV, 1995d). Four cap
alternatives were evaluated for Site 7. All four alternatives include drainage controls, gas
monitoring, groundwater monitoring and land use restrictions. No landfill gas collection/control
system is required because it has been determined that the landfill does not have the potential to
generate significant amounts of gas. Three of the alternatives, Alternatives 1,2, and 3, consisted
of the four layers of a prescriptive cap, but the barrier layer material was varied. The prescriptive
cap layers are as follows:
Foundation layer minimum 2-foot-thick layer of soil over the waste, compacted to provide
adequate structural support for successive layers
Barrier layer infiltration barrier layer composed of low-permeability material
Drainage layer: soil or geocomposite layer with high permeability to permit drainage of
infiltration through the topmost protective soil layer
SCVlO-98/WFC/PtndIeto«OD10-27.wpd 2-57
-------
Protective soil layer: minimum 12-inch soil layer to protect the barrier layer, control surface
erosion, and provide a medium for vegetation
The different barrier layers for Alternatives 1,2, and 3, respectively, are as follows:
1. Low permeability clay layer
2. Native soil mixed with bentonite to reduce permeability
3. A textured high-density polyethylene (HDPE) flexible membrane liner (FML).
One additional cap alternative, an evapotranspiration (ET) cover (Alternative 4), was evaluated in
the Technical Addendum to the EE/CA (SWDIV, 1997d). This cap includes a vegetated topsoil
layer (1 foot thick) over a minimally compacted 3- to 4-foot soil layer. The bottom layer consists
of a 1-foot compacted low-permeability (lxlO'J centimeters per second [cm/sj) soil layer.
2.5.6 Summary of Comparative Analysis of Alternatives - Site 7
The four cap alternatives were evaluated on the basis of effectiveness, implementability, cost, and
compliance with ARARS. A summary of the evaluation is provided in the following sections.
2.S.6.1 Overall Protection of Human Health and the Environment and Compliance
withARARs
Each of the four alternatives would provide adequate overall protection of human health and the
environment For each alternative, the major threat is addressed through containment and
appropriate continued monitoring and maintenance. Each of the alternatives also comply with
ARARs. Details are provided in Appendix B
2.5.6.2 Long-Term Effectiveness and Permanence
Each of the alternatives provide a high degree of long-term effectiveness and permanence. The
cap and monitoring activities provide adequate and reliable reduction of exposure pathways and
potential human health and ecological risks. The ET cover, however, will require less
maintenance than the other cap options since the cover is inherently self-renewing and not
damaged by long-term wetting and drying. Also, the ET cover will not include synthetic materials
and therefore will not be prone to potential deterioration over time.
SCW-9SAVPC/Pexflet
-------
2.5.6.3 Reduction of Toxlclty, Mobility, and Volume Through Treatment
Alteratives 1,2, 3, and 4 do not include treatment, therefore, no reduction in toxicity, mobility, or
volume would occur due to treatment
2.5.6.4 Short-Term Effectiveness
Potential exposure and protection procedures for workers during implementation of tbe capping
alternatives would be addressed in tbe site-specific health and safety plans. Potential exposure of
site personnel and nearby receptors to windborne particulates would be minimized through the use
of dust suppressants and appropriate personal protective equipment.
Each alternative would provide for protection of surface water and groundwater. Alternative 4
provides for restoration of the site to accommodate future-habitat to support endangered species.
Alternative 4 also preserves additional areas of habitat along the north slope, thus eliminating
mitigation measures required by the other three alternatives.
Alternative 4 requires tbe least amount of construction time, approximately 7 months. The other
alternatives range between 9 to 12 months for implementation.
2.5.6.5 Implemontabinty
Equipment, materials, and labor for each alternative are available. The ET cover, Alternative 4
will be relatively easy to construct since only general earthwork is needed with no requirement for
strict compaction control. Additionally, no seaming of synthetic materials is required.
2,5.6.6 Cost
The overallcost and costper acre for Alternative 4 are less thanthe costs for Alternatives 1,2,
and 3. The estimated costs for each alternative are as follows:
Coss Cost per Acre
(Millions $) (Millions $)
Alternative 1 $5.9 022
Alternative 2 $6.2 022
Alternatives $5.7 0'21
Alternative 4 $3.1 '
2-59
-------
2.5.6.7 State Acceptance
San Diego RWQCB ag*. with the selectto. of «he ETc.p and associated acUoas
tor oitc /,
Community Acceptance
No comments were received from the public during the review for the Site 7 EE/CA.
2.5.7 Selected Remedy for Site 7
TheselectedremedyforSite7isAlternative4-Evap0transPiraUonCover. TOs alternative
includes construction of an ET cover system for the top deck of Box Canyon landfill No
aditionalcovermaterialforthenorthslopeofthelandfillisplanned. THe north slope is
approximately 4 acres in size with densely vegetated slopes of 2.0-2.5 horizontal on 1.0 vertical
and Deludes approximately 5 feet of existing cover material. Since this slope is considerably
steep a «W*^«*** runs off the slope with very little actually infiltrating the slope. The
TR-55 runoff model developed by the Soil Conservation Service (SCS) indicates that for a
24-hourloa-year storm event (3.3 inches of rain) approximately 2.54 inches runs off and only
*• DUC t0
terraces.
atches wzll be mstalled at the benches to eliminate infiltration along the relatively flat
The ET cov^ utd^es the natural process of surface runoff, storage, evaporation, and transpiration
v7Ee±T^*^*^*™^^^^«»w™**+.
a vegetated top sod layer, a minimally compacted soil layer and an optional low-permeability layer
ThepurposeofthefcpsoH^^ ver.
underlymg minimaUy compacted soil layer is to provide substantial water storage for removal by
the natural process of evaporation. The basic purpose of the low permeability bottom layer
is oactasabarner between the coverandthe waste. Soils most suitable for ET covers are those
with a high available water retention capacity and an adequate supply of nutrients to support
vigorous plant growth. Vegetation's most suitable for ET covers are generally a wide mixture of
native grass species so that high transpiration is maintained even under adverse growing
conditions and during long-term climatic changes.
SCW-98/WPOPe«lleuVROD9-28.wpd 2-60
-------
ET covers, in general, require less maintenance than traditional covers since this type of cover
system is inherently self renewing. Also, ET covers are generally more easily constructed since
only general earthwork is required and strict compaction control is generally not required.
Additionally, labor intensive details associated with synthetic materials are not required.
The ET cover selected for Site 7 includes a vegetated topsoil layer (1-foot-thick) underlain by a
minimally compacted 3- to 4-foot soil layer with a 1- to 3-foot compacted, low-permeability
bottom layer. A schematic diagram of this cross-section is .shown in Figure 2-12. The cap will
cover 28 acres. This alternative would include grading the existing surface, transporting on-base
borrow soils as necessary, and importing topsoil. On-base borrow soil will be obtained from the
Lemon Grove area of MCB Camp Pendleton. Lemon Grove is located approximately 1 mile
southwest of Site 7. The borrow soil sites have been screened for biological arid archaeological
concerns. A vernal pool area was identified near the borrow sites. The vernal pool will be
fenced prior to removal activities. No archaeological concerns were identified.
To ensure that human health and the environment are protected in the future, no breaching of the
soil cap at Site 7, through trenching, excavation, or any other similar activity may occur unless
prior approval of the FFA signatories is obtained. This restriction does not apply to maintenance
activities for purposes of preservation or restoration of the physical integrity of the cap.
Maintenance activities may include cleaning of drainage channels and pipes, replacement of
erosion control materials, regrading of channels, and replacement of pipes, inlets, or catch basins.
Also, if significant erosion results from heavy rain episodes, partial excavation of the cover soil
and import and placement of additional cover soil, as well as reseeding of the cover, would be
conducted. Access roads and the landfill perimeter road will be maintained and improved as
necessary. Signs and fencing will also be repaired or replaced as part of the maintenance
activities. If major land use changes are planned, including any change that is inconsistent with
the exposure assumptions in the risk assessment, that is specifically prohibited to protect human
health or the environment, that may disrupt the effectiveness of the remedy, or that might alter or
negate the need for the land use restriction, the FFA signatories must be provided with written
notification of such a proposed action at least 60 days prior to the beginning of the
implementation of the proposed action. MCB Camp Pendleton shall prepare and include an
evaluation of the risk to human health and the environment and an evaluation of any need for
additional remedial action resulting from the proposed action and shall propose any necessary
changes to the remedial action selected in the OU3 ROD in the written notification of a proposed
SCl/l-99AVPC/Pendlelo/RODI2l99.wpd 2-61
-------
change. The EPA will advise whether a ROD amendment or an explanation of significant
difference is required. The FFA signatories must provide written concurrence with MCB Camp
Pendleton's evaluation of risk and proposal regarding any necessary changes in the remedial
action, if required, within 30 days of receipt of the written notification from MCB Camp
Pendleton.
MCB Camp Pendleton shall notify the FFA signatories of any plan to lease or transfer Site 7 real
property to a non-Federal or Federal entity. Such notification shall be provided at least 30 days
in advance of the lease or transfer conveyance. The land use restriction shall be incorporated as
part of the lease or transfer agreement; including FOSL and POST procedures MCB Camp
Pendleton shall comply with Section 120(h)(3) of CERCLA in any such transfers to a non-
Federal entity.
The MCB Camp Pendleton Base Master Plan will be amended to incorporate the above-
mennoned use limitations and notice requirements for Site 7. The Master Plan amendments will
also include language that describes the risk to human health and the environment that exists at
Site 7; will reference the MCB Camp Pendleton Group C and Group D RI reports the Site 7
EE/CA, the OU3 FS report, and the OU3 ROD; and will provide a legal description (metes and
bounds) of the boundaries of Site 7. The language in the Master Plan amendments will also
include the title and dates of the above-listed documents and their storage location These
amendments to the Master Plan will be completed by MCB Camp Pendleton within 1 year of
s,gning the MCB Camp Pendleton OU3 ROD. The FFA signatories will be provided with a
copy of the amendments to the Master Plan reflecting the land use limitations at Site 7 The land
use restriction will be reviewed and verified during the CERCLA 5-year review process.
Long-term groundwater monitoring will also be conducted. Selected groundwater monitoring
wells will be analyzed biannually for 5 years. The collected groundwater monitoring wells will
be analyzed for volatile and semivolatile organics, metals, and general chemistry These
groundwater monitoring results will be assessed at the end of 5 years, or sooner if appropriate to
determme if any additional sampling is required. No remediation for groundwater at Site 7 is
necessary. The carcinogenic human health risk is within the EPA's risk management range.
The estimated cost for this alternative is $3.1 million. The cost per acre is $109,300.
SCI/l-99/WPC/Pendlclo/RODI2199.wpd 2-62
-------
2.5.8 Statutory Determinations
This section discusses how the selected remedy for Site 7 meets the statutory requirements of
CERCLA Section 121. Under CERCLA Section 121, the selected remedy at a Superfund site
must entail remedial actions that achieve adequate protection of human health and the
environment. In addition, CERCLA Section 121 establishes several other statutory requirements
and preferences specifying that, when complete, the selected remedial action must comply with
ARARs established under Federal and State environmental laws unless a statutory waiver is
justified. The selected remedy must also be cost-effective and must entail permanent solutions
and alternative treatment technologies or resource recovery technologies to the maximum extent
practicable. Finally, the statute includes a preference for remedies that employ, as their principal
element, treatment technologies that permanently and significantly reduce the volume, toxicity,
or mobility of hazardous wastes.
2.5.8.1 Protection of Human Health and the Environment
The remedy selected for Site 7 will provide protection of human health and the environment by
eliminating direct contact of landfilled wastes or inhalation of particulates by humans and
animals. The cap will also minimize infiltration of water and leaching of contaminants to the
groundwater. Cleanup levels were not established because the type of cap selected and
associated actions were determined by ARARs. Short-term potential risks to workers and nearby
receptors will be addressed in the site-specific health and safety plan; dust suppression measures
and protective clothing will be specified.
2.5.8.2 Compliance with Applicable or Relevant and Appropriate Requirements
The selected remedy will comply with all Federal and State ARARs. The ARARs for
Alternative 4 at Site 7 are discussed in Appendix B.
2.5.8.3 Cost-Effectiveness
The selected remedy was evaluated for cost-effectiveness in comparison with the other three
alternatives. The selected alternative is the least expensive alternative that will be protective of
human health and the environment and comply with ARARs.
SCI/l-WWPC/Pendlelo/ROD12I99.wpd 2-63
-------
2.5.8.4 Use of Permanent Solutions and Alternative Treatment Technologies to
the Extent Practicable
The selected remedy uses permanent solutions and treatment technologies to the maximum
extent possible. Because the site is an inactive landfill, the presumptive remedy was considered
appropriate for Site 7.
The selected alternative provides the best balance between effectiveness and cost of the four
alternatives considered with respect to the five EPA balancing criteria (i.e., long-term
effectiveness; reduction of toxicity, mobility, or volume through treatment; short-term
effectiveness; implementability; and cost).
The selected alternative and Alternatives 1, 2, and 3 provide a high degree of long-term
effectiveness and permanence because wastes would be appropriately contained. Under the
selected alternative the wastes would be covered with an engineered ET cap.
None of the alternatives would reduce mobility, toxicity, or volume of the waste because
treatment was found to be neither practical nor feasible. Treatment technologies were not
specifically evaluated because based on presumptive remedy guidance, they are routinely and
appropriately screened out on the basis of effectiveness, feasibility/and cost. The selected
alternative provided the greatest short-term effectiveness, due to the shorter timeframe required
for implementation.
Alternative 4 is easier to implement than the other alternatives, because seaming and placement
of synthetic materials are not components of the ET cap.
Alternative 4 is less expensive than Alternatives 1,2, and 3. Because Alternative 4 provides
greater long-term and short-term effectiveness, the most cost-effective alternative has been
selected.
2.6 No Action Selected for Sites 1B, 1C, 1G, 11, 2C, 2D, 2F, 2G, 10, 16, 17,
18, 27, 32, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, and 42
This section presents descriptions, histories, characteristics, and risks associated with the OU3 no
action sites. For the no action sites, all inorganics exceeding screening criteria and any detected
organics are typically shown in the site-specific figures.
SCI/l-99AVPC/Pendleto/RODl2l99.wpd 2-64
-------
2.6.1 Site 1B • Refuse Burning Ground in 11 Area
Site IB is a former refuse burning ground in the 11 Area.
2.6.1.1 Site Name, Location, and Description
Site IB - Refuse Burning Ground in 11 Area, is located in the San Luis Rey Basin, on an
unpaved road intersecting 14th Street, approximately 0.5 mile southeast of Vandegrift Boulevard
(Figure I-2). The former burning ground is approximately 340 feet long and 100 feet wide. The
site is bordered on the east and south by a densely vegetated stream-cut canyon. To the north and
west of Site IB are low rolling hills with light to moderate vegetation.
No perennial surface water is present in the vicinity of the site. During significant rainfall events,
surface water percolates into the subsurface, evaporates, or runs off the site and eventually
discharges into Pilgrim Creek, approximately 0.5 mile to the east.
The burning ground is no longer in use and military and civilian personnel are not on site on a
regular basis. The nearest residential housing is approximately 0.25 mile southwest of the site.
No base production wells are located within a I-mile radius of Site IB. There are no water
production wells in the San Luis Rey Basin.
2.6.1.2 Site History and Enforcement Activities
Site history and enforcement activities for refuse burning grounds are described in
Section 2.4.1.2.
2.6.1.3 Summary of Site Characteristics
Site IB was investigated in June and July 1996 during the RI for Group D sites. Five soil
samples were collected from two borings and were analyzed for metals, VOCs, SVOCs, and
pesticides and PCBs. No sediment or surface-water samples were collected because no surface
water was present on site. No groundwater samples were collected because drilling refusal
occurred at less than 50 feet below ground surface, before encountering sufficient groundwater
for sampling.
SCI/l-99/WPC/Pendlelo/ROD12l99 »pd 2-65
-------
2.6.1.3.1 Geology and Hydrogeology
Shallow geology at Site I3 consists of Quaternary alluvium overlying granitic rock (bedrock
P
*p« • . ' ••••*•
-------
2.6.1.4.1 Human Health Risk Characterization
COPCs in Site IB soil include metals and pesticides. Based on the conceptual site model
current/future workers and future residents could be exposed to soil contaminants through
incidental mgestion, dermal contact, and inhalation of particulates.
The total residential cancer risk for maximum reported COPCs is l.lxlO'5. The primary
contributors to risk are arsenic (approximately 76 percent of the total risk) and beryllium
(approximately 24 percent of the total risk). However, arsenic and beryllium concentrations at
Sue IB are below the respective background concentrations. Excluding arsenic and beryllium as
naturally occumng, the incremental site risks calculated using EPA and Cal/EPA PRGs are both
1.4x10-, which is below the lower end of the risk management range. The cumulative residential
hazard (noncarcmogenic) for maximum detected COPCs is 0.51..
The Site 1B residential cancer risk and noncarcinogenic hazard are less than the risk and hazard
catena. In addition, the maximum lead concentration in soil (26.8 mg/kg) at Site 1B is below the
EPA and Cal/EPA residential PRGs of 400 and 130 mg/kg, respectively. Therefore, Site IB soil
is considered protective of human heal th.
Groundwater is not considered a complete exposure pathway for either current/future workers or
future residents. Groundwater sampling was not performed at Site IB because drilling refusal
occurred before encountering sufficient groundwater for sampling. Site IB is not located above a
shallow aquifer associated with any of the four major groundwater basins at MCB Camp
Pendleton (i.e., San Mateo, San Onofre, Las Flores, or Santa Margarita Basin). The site is
topographically Wgher than, and isolated from, the aquifers associated with these major basins
Therefore, groundwater at Site 1B was not evaluated further in the HHRA.
2.6.1.4.2 Ecological Risk Assessment
Lead was the only preliminary COPEC with an HQ exceeding l.O (Figure 2-13). The HQ for
lead (l.5) exceeds but is close to l.O for deer mouse, indicating that the potential for toxicity is
relatively low. HQs are less than 1.0 for the other representative species evaluated.
Site IB includes normative grasslands and coastal sage scrub habitat. Several wildlife species
were observed, and special-status species could be present on site.
SCI/|.99/WPC/Pendl«lo/ROD12l99.wpd 2-67
-------
concentrations to cause adverse effects. Potentially harmful contaminant
2.6.15 Description of the No Act/on Alternative
soii
- The maximum lead concentration is below the screening values.
a compiete
receptors. U1 not llke|y P°se a risk to ecological
26.2 Site 1C- Refuse Burning Ground in 13 Area
i«e I C ,s a former refuse burning ground in the 1 3 Area.
2.6.2.* Site Name, Location, and Description
SCI/|.99/WPC/Pendlelo/RODI2l99ivpd 2-68
-------
An unpaved dirt road runs directly through the middle of the site, and low rolling hills surround
the site.
No perennial surface water is present in the vicinity of the Site 1C burning ground. During
significant rainfall events, surface water percolates into the subsurface, evaporates, or runs off the
site and discharges into the Santa Margarita River approximately 1 mile to the east.
No development is located in the immediate vicinity of the site. The refuse burning ground is no
longer in operation, and military and civilian personnel are present on site infrequently. The
undeveloped area surrounding the site is classified as a maneuver area with gently sloping
topography covered by natural vegetation (Innis-Tennebaum Architects, Inc., 1990). The nearest
troop housing is approximately 0.25 mile southeast of the site. The nearest family housing, the
Ranch House, is located about 1 mile west of the site. No base production wells are located
within a I -mile radius of Site 1C.
The dominant habitat at Site 1C is normative grassland consisting primarily of wild oat and
mustard. Coastal sage scrub habitat consists of coyote bush and castor bean, with a few sage
interspersed. Special-status wildlife species potentially present at this site include California
gnatcatcher. Bird species observed during the reconnaissance survey include western
meadowlark and cliff swallow.
2.6.2.2 Site History and Enforcement Activities
Site history and enforcement activities for refuse burning grounds are described in
Section 2.4.1.2.
2.6.2.3 Summary of Site Characteristics
Site 1C was investigated in June and July 1996 during the RI for Group D sites. Eight soil
samples were collected from two borings and were analyzed for metals, VOCs, SVOCs, and
pesticides and PCBs. No sediment or surface-water samples were collected because no surface
water was present on site. No groundwater samples were collected because drilling refusal
occurred before encountering sufficient groundwater for sampling.
SO-|-99/WPC/Pendleto/ROD12!99.wpd 2-69
-------
2. 6.2.3. 1 Geology and Hydrogeology
Based on site geology, groundwater is assumed to flow to the south, following surface
rrj"1—— —••—.«»«»«— ^
=.
2.6.2.3.2 Soil Results
resu"s from soii sampiing at si
criteria
ri*ft—d
Organ, fc«i
lie compounds were detected in soil at Site 1C
- !"hl4h- t°T COnCemrati°nS °f acetone were detected ^ Camples from bo^Ling's at
^, ine mgnest concentration was 0 074 ma/\f \ AAI •
Vi*t mg/Kg. in addition, 2-butannnp anH Ar/-.r.i«». iic^i
were detected a, concentrations of 0.003 and 0.01, mg*g. respective,,, in thelfc
ftombonng1CB.O,. None of the detected organics exceeded ecological screening
Inorganfcfl
BsrvlIlUrn W2*i thf* nnlv in^k *
DD/**« A »*.!_ it*.. " • sou at concentrations exceeding
PROS. Although berylhum exceeded the PRO in all nine samples, concentrations wm below
background concentration of ,.42 mg/kg and below „, ^^ ^.^ ^^ " W°W
SCI/l-99/WPC/Pend!eto/RODI2199 wpd
2-70
-------
Summary
No organ.cs were detected in soil at concentrations exceeding PRGs or PLEs; beryllium was the
only .norganic compound detected, but concentrations were below background. Groundwater is
« mated to be 120 feet below ground surface and is not expected to be impacted. No significant
site-related contamination exists at Site 1C.
2.6.2.4 Summary of Risks Associated with Site 1C
Human health and ecological risk assessments were conducted for Site IC using data collected
dunng the Group D RI. Risk assessment methodologies are summarized in Section 24 I 4 Risk
assessment summaries for Site IC are presented in this section.
2.6.2.4.1 Human Health Risk Characterization
COPCs detected in Site 1C soil include metals, VOCs, and PCBs (Aroclor-1242). Current/future
workers an future residents could be exposed to soil contaminants through incidental ingeslT
dermal contact, and inhalation of VOCs or peculates.
The cumulative residential cancer risk for maximum detected COPCs in soil is 5 1x10- The
pnmary contributor to risk is beryllium (approximately 94 percent of the total risk) The
maximum concentration of beryllium detected at Site 1C is-less than the background
concentration for the San Luis Rey Basin. Excluding beryllium as naturally occurring the
incremental cancer risk is less than 1 x 10'6.
The cumulative residential HI for maximum detected COPCs is 0.78 and is attributable primarily
to metals. Excludmg the portion of total hazard attributable to background metals the
incremental site HI is 0.2, which is below the threshold criterion of 1:0.
The Site 1C residential cancer risk and noncarcinogenic hazard do not exceed risk and hazard
criteria. In addition, the maximum lead concentration (6.2 mg/kg) is below the EPA and
Cal/EPA residential soil PRGs of 400 and 130 mg/kg, respectively. Therefore, Site 1C soil is
considered protective of human health.
Groundwater is not considered a complete exposure pathway for either current/future workers or
nature residents. Groundwater sampling was not performed at Site 1C during the RJ because
drilling refusal occurred in weathered bedrock less than 50 feet below ground surface before
SC[/I-99AVPC/Pendleto/RODI2l99.wp
-------
encountenng sufficient groundwater for sampling. Site 1 C is not located above a shallow aquifer
assoaated with any of the four major groundwater basins at MCB Camp Pendleton (i e San
Mateo, San Onofre, Las Flores, or Santa Margarita Basin). The site is topographically higher
than, and isolated from, the aquifers associated with these major basins. Therefore, groundwater
at Site 1C was not evaluated further in the HHRA.
2.6.2.4.2 Ecological Risk Assessment
None of the preliminary inorganic COPECs exceeded available background values All
preliminary organic COPECs were evaluated for potential toxicity. None of the preliminary
COPECs had HQs exceeding 1.0; therefore, no final COPECs were identified for this site.
Site 1C is considered protective of ecological receptors.
2.6.2.5 Description of the No Action Alternative
The no action alternative selected for Site 1C includes no institutional controls Site 1C is
considered protective of human health and the environment for the following reasons:
iIrrT8 nl eXP°SUre SCenari0' maximum soil concentrations resulted
in an ILCR Jess than 1 x 1 0'6 and an HI less than 1 .0.
The maximum lead concentration is less than the screening values.
for either current/future
wnf
workers or future residents.
The refuse burning ground is no longer in operation, and military and civilian
personnel are on site only infrequently.
Evaluation of potential ecological risks from exposure to soil indicated that the
potential for exposure and effects is low and will not likely pose a risk to ecological
rc
2.6.3 Site 11 - Refuse Burning Ground in 63 Area
Site II consists of a former refuse burning ground in the 63 Area.
2.6.3.1 Site Name, Location, and Description
Site II - Refuse Burning Ground in 63 Area, is located approximately 1,250 feet east of
Cristianitos Road (Figure 1-2), northeast of its intersection with San Mateo Road. The refuse
SCI/l-99/WPC/Pcndleto/RODl2l99.wpd 2-72
-------
burning ground is approximately 425 feet long and 125 feet wide. The site is bordered on the
north and south by steep hills that rise 200 feet above the site and are covered with moderate to
dense vegetation, on the south by a paved access road, and on the west and east by a vegetated
stream-cut canyon. Site II is in the center of a stream-cut canyon that slopes to the west and
eventually drains into Cristianitos Creek, approximately 1,500 feet west of the site. The
surrounding area is characterized by low rolling hills.
No perennial surface water is present in the vicinity of Site II. Surface water at the site is
ephemeral and follows the gently sloping ground surface to the west. During significant rainfall
events, surface water percolates into the subsurface, evaporates, or runs off the site and ,
discharges into Cristianitos Creek.
The Site II burning ground is no longer in operation, and military and civilian personnel are
present on site only infrequently. The undeveloped area to the north, east, and south of the site is
classified as a maneuver area and consists of steep slopes covered by moderate to dense
vegetation. To the west of the site is the Cristianitos Area, which contains a fire station, two
clubs, and a fleet hospital training complex. The nearest troop housing is approximately 1 mile
southwest of the site in the 62 Area. No family housing is located within several miles of the site
and none is planned. The nearest base production well is approximately 0.5 mile south of
Site II.
The dominant habitats at Site 11 are coastal sage scrub and normative grassland. The site is
densely vegetated with sage, coyote bush, fennel, laurel sumac, and mulefat. Special-status
species potentially present on site include California gnatcatcher and least Bell's vireo. Bird
species observed during the reconnaissance survey include California towhee, mourning dove,
American kestrel, red-tailed hawk, scrub jay, and rufous-sided towhee. Evidence of coyote use
(scat) was observed, along with active small mammal burrows and holes.
2.6.3.2 Site History and Enforcement Activities
Site history and enforcement activities for refuse burning grounds are described in
Section 2.4.1.2.
Sa/l-99/WPCVPendleto/ROD!2i99/wpd 2-73
-------
2.S.3.3 Summary of S/te Cftaracterfsffcs
Site 1 1 was investigated in June and July
were col,ec,ed from ,wo
PCB, No sedtaen,
2 63.3. f Geology and Hydrogeology
bedrock of the La Jolla Group.
whnou,
•2 fee, be,ow gradea, S«e 34.
,k. Pi t '
"" "*'
D *» * soi, sampies
"""""urn overlies
a,
"*
•o receive o, relain . signifi ,
Ma,eo Basin is conceauaed primarily in
2.6.3.3.2 Soil Results
no, eXpec,ed
Oroundwaler in ,h= San
SCI/|.99/WPC/Pendlc«o/RODI2199.wpd
2-74
-------
Organics
No organic compounds were detected in soil samples from Site II (Figure 2-15).
Inorganics
Arsenic was detected in four of seven samples and beryllium was detected in all seven samples
from both site borings at concentrations exceeding PRGs but below background concentrations
(F,gure 2-15). No inorganics were detected at concentrations exceeding PLEs. The maximum
arsenic and beryllium concentrations were 2.9 and 1 mg/kg, respectively.
Summary
No organics were detected in soil; arsenic and beryllium were the only inorganic compounds
detected, but concentrations were below background. Groundwater is estimated to be deeper
than 100 feet below ground surface at Site II and is not expected to be impacted. No site-related
contamination exists at Site 11.
2.6.3.4 Summary of Risks Associated with Site 11
Human health and ecological risk assessments were conducted for Site II using data collected
durmg the Group D RI. Risk assessment methodologies are summarized in Section 2.4.1.4 Risk
assessment summaries for Site U are presented in this section.
2.6.3.4,1 Human Health Risk Characterization
COPCs in Site II soil are limited to metals. Current/future workers and future residents could be
exposed to soil contaminants through incidental ingestion, dermal contact, and inhalation of
particulates.
The cumulative residential risk for maximum detected COPCs in soil is 1.2x10'5. The primary
risks drivers are arsenic (approximately 63 percent of the total risk) and beryllium
(approximately 37 percent of the total risk). However, arsenic and beryllium concentrations are
below background. Excluding arsenic and beryllium as naturally occurring, no site-related
carcinogenic COPCs are present at Site II.
The cumulative residential hazard for maximum detected COPCs is 0.57. Excluding the portion
of total hazard attributable to background metals, the incremental residential site hazard is less
than 0.01. Excluding arsenic and beryllium as naturally occurring background levels, the Site 11
SCI/l-99/WPC/P«ndleto/RODl2199wpd 2-75
-------
residential cancer risk and noncarcinogenic hazard are less than the risk and hazard criteria. In
addition, the maximum lead concentration (9.6 mg/kg) is less than the EPA and Cal/EPA
residential PRGs of 400 and 130 mg/kg, respectively. Therefore, Site II soil is considered
protective of human health.
Groundwater is not considered a complete exposure pathway for either current/future workers or
future residents. Groundwater sampling was not performed at Site II during the Group D RI
because drilling refusal occurred in weathered bedrock less than 50 feet below ground surface,
before encountering sufficient groundwater for sampling purposes. Site II is not located above a
shallow aquifer associated with any of the four major groundwater basins at MCB Camp
Pendleton (i.e., San Mateo, San Onofre, Las Flores, or Santa Margarita Basin). The site is
topographically higher than, and isolated from, the aquifers associated with these major basins.
Therefore, groundwater at Site II was not evaluated further in the HHRA and is considered
protective of human health.
2.6.3.4.2 Ecological Risk Assessment
None of the preliminary inorganic COPECs exceeded background values, and no organic
chemicals were detected. Therefore, no final COPECs were identified for Site II; the site is
considered protective of ecological receptors.
2.6.3.5 Description of the No Action Alternative
The no action alternative selected for Site II includes no institutional controls. Site 11 is
considered protective of human health and the environment for the following reasons:
No carcinogenic chemicals were detected at concentrations exceeding background.
Under the future residential exposure scenario, maximum soil concentrations resulted
in an HI less than 1.0.
• The maximum lead concentration is below the screening values.
• Groundwater is not considered a complete exposure pathway for either current/future
workers or future residents.
• The refuse burning ground is no longer in operation, and military and civilian
personnel are on site only infrequently.
SCI/l-99/WPC/Pendleto/ROD12l99.wpd 2-76
-------
™S0n °f P0temial ecol°SicaI risks fr™ exposure to soil indicated that no
rece tors " ed back8round concentrations and the site is protective of ecological
rece tors
2. 6.4 Site 2C - Grease Disposal Pit in 33 Area
Site 2C consists of a former grease disposal pit in the 33 Area.
2.6.4. 1 Site Name, Location, and Description
Site 2C - Grease Disposal Pit in 33 Area, is located approximately 1,800 feet southwest of the
intersection of Basilone and Stagecoach Roads (Figure 1-2). The grease pit is approximately
80 feet long and 70 feet wide. The site is bordered on the east by an unpaved road and is on a
plateau surrounded by light to moderate vegetation. The site slopes gently to the northwest and
drams into a flat land at an elevation approximately 65 feet lower than the site. The surrounding
area consists of low rolling hills.
No perennial surface water is present in the vicinity of Site 2C. During the rainy season, surface-
water runoff originating from the grease disposal pit percolates into the subsurface, evaporates,
runs off the site, or drains northwesterly into the flatland and a tributary canyon that eventually
discharges into the Santa Margarita River.
The grease pit is no longer in operation, and military and civilian personnel are present on site
only infrequently. Land surrounding Site 2C is covered with natural vegetation. The area farther
northwest is used primarily for training and contains a temporary biotreatment facility. The area
north, east, and south of the site is undeveloped and is classified as a maneuver area; this area
consists of gently rolling hills covered by natural vegetation (fnnis-Tennebaum Architects, Inc.,
1990). The nearest family housing, the Ranch House, is about 1 mile southeast of the site. The'
nearest designated troop housing is in the Vado Del Rio (25) Area, approximately 1 mile
northeast of the site. No other family housing is located within several miles of the site and none
is planned. The nearest base production well is approximately 1,700 feet northwest of Site 2C.
The dominant habitats at Site 2C are normative grassland and coastal sage scrub. Dominant plant
species in the normative grassland include turkey mullein, annual grass (wild oat, brome),
fivehook bassia, and yellow star-thistle. Black and white sage and coyote brush dominate the
coastal sage scrub habitat. A wildlife survey of Site 2C was conducted in October 1995, after the
main breeding period for many bird species. Nine species of birds were observed. No small
SCl/l-99AVPC/'Pendl«o/ROD12l99.wpd ' 2-77
-------
mammal
.. 0 ——..wv.s.itu, uuwever, active runwz
or ampniLITwiroTserved0"3 S ^^ ***'" "^ """ ^ PreSent °n site' No reP^s
2-6.4.2 Site History and Enforcement Activities
Grease disposal pits were used between 1942 and 1980 fnr H-
operation dates for most of the sites ar V P° meSS ha" grease; the
volumes of grease disposed of in * "' ^ mf0miati0n *
was,e disposal in UK« pits ,!« ponfM f n
discounted. The pits w^doTed bv T "f ^^ """^ Cann°' h
and then bacMIIing wi,
*. POLs may aiso have been dispoof n i;^0" **« "«
reveal any obvious stress to local vegetation. reconna,Ssance of th. pits did no,
2.8.4.3 Summary of Site Characteristics
Site 2C was initially investigated fa 1903 and 1994 durine the RI fm r
was conducted a, Site 2C in June and July , 99o dlnTth! w , f " S"eS' PhaSe 2 W
soil sanies were coHected from two boCllL* c ?7 ° Si'K- A '^ °fB
are shown in Figure 2-16. Samles wer ° " ">Ca'i0'1S- Sample ">ca'io"s
surface. 3 ept ° more than 50 «« below ground
2.&4.3.Y Geology and Hydrogeology
SCr/l-99AVPC/Pcndlclo/ROD12199. wpd 2-78
-------
Based on site topography, local groundwater is assumed to flow to the northwest. Soil borings
were drilled to a maximum depth of 16 feet below ground surface without encountering
groundwater. Groundwater was encountered at about 10 feet below grade in wells installed in
the nearby Santa Margarita Basin, which is about 100 feet lower in elevation than Site 2C.
Based on this difference in topography, the groundwater table at Site 2C is estimated to be
deeper than 100 feet below ground surface. The alluvium and bedrock at the site are not
expected to receive or retain a significant or beneficial amount of groundwater. Groundwater in
the Santa Margarita Basin is concentrated primarily in the alluvium along the basin floor and not
in the adjacent topographically higher areas (where Site 2C is located).
2.6.4.3.2 Soil Results
This section discusses analytical results from soil sampling at Site 2C. Results are summarized
m Figure 2-16, which presents delected organics and any inorganics that exceed risk/hazard
criteria.
Organics
No organic compounds were detected at concentrations exceeding PRGs in Site 2C soil
(Figure 2-16). Diesel was detected at concentrations of 120 and 2,500 mg/kg in the 9-foot
sample from boring 2CB-1 and surface sample 2CSS001, respectively; these concentrations
exceed the 100-mg/kg screening level for diesel recommended by the LUFT Field Manual
guidance (California State Water Resources Control Board [S WRCB], 1989).
In addition, 15 other organics were detected at Site 2C at concentrations below evaluation
criteria: ethylbenzene, TCE, total xylenes, 1,1,1-trichloroethane (TCA), benzoic acid, bis(2-
ethylhexyl)phthalate, di-n-butylphthalate, butylbenzylphthalate, benzo(b)fluoranthene, chrysene,
pyrene, 4,4'-DDE, dieldrin, Aroclor-1254, and gasoline. The maximum concentration detected
was 12 mg/kg for toluene, TCE was detected once at 0.11 mg/kg in the 9-foot sample from
2CSB-01 but was not detected in the two samples collected at deeper intervals in the same boring
or in any other soil samples collected at the site.
The 2CSS001 location was resampled (Sample ID - 2CSS001 A) for leachability testing during
the Phase 2 RI. The sample was analyzed for TPH-diesel but no diesel was detected. The
duplicate sample analysis from the same location (2CSS201A-01) yielded a diesel concentration
of 1,800 mg/kg but was qualified, indicating that the detection did not match the diesel
SCt/1 -99AVPC/Pendleto/ROD 12199.wpd 2-79
-------
calibration standard. The sample was further analyzed for volatiles using the synthetic
precipitation leaching procedure (SPLP); the only detection was toluene at a concentration of
4.6 Mg/1. Based on the SPLP results, volatiles are not expected to leach at unacceptable
concentrations.
To evaluate the leachability of diesel, the 2CSS001 location was sampled for a third time (sample
2CSS001B) and subjected to TPH-diesel analysis and SPLP analysis for diesel. The total
analysis indicated a diesel concentration of 260 mg/kg, and the SPLP analysis indicated a
concentration of 2.6 milligrams per liter (mg/1). The same sample was reanalyzed once more (as
sample 2CSS001C) by an independent laboratory to confirm the leachability. The total analysis
showed a diesel concentration of 718 mg/kg, whereas the SPLP analysis for diesel indicated a
concentration of 51.3 mg/1. These results indicated that diesel would not adversely impact
groundwater.
Inorganic-?
Beryllium was detected in 4 of 12 samples and lead was detected in 1 sample at concentrations
exceeding PRGs (Figure 2-16). Beryllium concentrations were below background (1.42 mg/kg).
The lead concentration in surface sample 2CSS001 exceeded the PRO and background.
The 2CSS001 location was resampled (sample 2CSS001 A) during the Phase 2 RI and was
analyzed for total lead and leachable lead; the corresponding results were 4.7 mg/kg and
nondetect (detection limit of 0.5 mg/1), respectively. To confirm the lead analytical results,
location 2CSS001 was sampled for a third time (sample 2CSS001B). Lead was detected at a
concentration of 65 mg/kg, but was not detected in the leachable lead analysis. Based on these
results, lead is not expected to impact groundwater.
Summary
No organics were detected in soil at concentrations exceeding PRGs. Diesel was detected in two
locations at concentrations exceeding the 100-mg/kg screening level. Beryllium and lead were
detected at concentrations exceeding PRGs. All beryllium concentrations were below
background. As discussed previously, the high lead detection was not confirmed during
subsequent resampling efforts. TCE was detected in soil at a concentration below the PRO but
was not detected in deeper samples at the same location or in any other samples collected at the
site. Because no organic or inorganic compounds in Site 2C soil pose a concern, impacts to
SCI/1 -99/WPC/PEndlclo/ROD 121 W.wpd 2-80
-------
groundwater from site-specific contamination are unlikely, fa addition, leachability testing
indicated that diesel concentrations in soil would not adversely impact groundwater.
2.6.4.4 Summary of Risks Associated with Site 2C
Human health and ecological risk assessments were conducted for Site 2C using data collected
dunng the Group C and Group D RIs. Risk assessment methodologies are summarized in
Section 2.4.1.4. Risk assessment summaries for Site 2C are presented in this section.
2.6.4.4.1 Human Health Risk Characterization
COPCs in Site 2C soil include metals, VOCs, SVOCs, pesticides, and PCBs. Current/future
workers and future residents could be exposed to soil contaminants through incidental ingestion,
dermal contact, and inhalation of VOCs or particulates.
The cumulative residential risk from the maximum detected COPCs is S.OxlO'6 and is primarily
altnbutable to beryllium (approximately 88 percent of the total risk). The maximum reported
concentration of beryllium (0.98 mg/kg) is below the associated background concentration
(1.42 mg/kg) and was excluded from the risk evaluation as naturally occurring. Excluding the
portion of total risk attributable to background metals, the incremental residential risk from
maximum detected COPCs is 9.5x IO'7.
The cumulative residential HI from maximum detected COPCs is 0.32 and is primarily
attributable to metals (approximately 81 percent of the total hazard). Excluding the portion of
total hazard attributable to background metals, the incremental residential site hazard is 0.06,
which is below the threshold criterion of 1.0.
The results of the HHRA indicate that the incremental residential site risk (9.5x10'7) for Site 2C
is below the lower end of the risk management range and the incremental residential site hazard
(0.06) is below the threshold criterion of 1.0. The maximum reported lead concentration
(421 mg/kg) exceeds the EPA and Cal/EPA residential PRGs of 400 and 130 mg/kg,
respectively, but is below the EPA and Cal/EPA industrial soil PRGs of 1,000 and 3,289 mg/kg,
respectively. The duplicate sample for the maximum lead concentration was substantially lower
(114 mg/kg), and the remaining nine detections of lead were below the background concentration
of 21.7 mg/kg. Therefore, no adverse health impacts are expected. Based on the results of the
HHRA, Site 2C soil is considered protective of human health.
SCI/1 -99/WPC/Pendleto/ROD 12199.wpd 2-81
-------
2.6.4.4.2 Ecological Risk Assessment
The HQs for ,wo preliminary COPECs (lead and diesel) exceed 1 .0 (Figure 2-16)
coated for representative species for each of six soi, ^p.es, wnlh ^1
morgamc and organ,c chemical, With one exception, the HQs ,h=, exceed , 0 2 ,„
™:r;;;^^^^
— -'.». --n^^^^
Site 2C consists of nonnative grassland and disturbed habitat. Birds were observed at the site
SCl/1.99/WPC/Pcndleto/RODI2l99.wpd 2-82
-------
2-B.4.S Description of the No Action Alternative
-
--
and civman personne, are on site
««-» " -« indicated tna, U,e site is
2.«.5 Sit, 20- Grease Disposal Pi, in 43 Ana
S,,e 2D consisu of a forme, grease disposal pi, in the 43 Area.
2.«.S.f Sit, Name, Location, and Descripaon
st by Site 20, on the northeast by Site IF an H
ion and Basilone Road Site 2oV ^ ""' """ S°Uth "y "sht to
^..asCre^appro^a^^l^S^^^^
by low rolling hills. The surround'ng area is characterized
discharges into Pulgas C Jk SUrfaCe' mp""^ °r ""* °ff *« «*« »d
, 43 Area con,a,ns several hundred buildings to, are used for
-------
area nnU-Te ' " *
f'" ' "
several mile, of the site and none is ' * h°°Si"g is located
>ocated aro , .*
2.6.5.2 S«e Many *-
-------
*• ,
e leva ,ion anne She 20 groundwater sample location was approximate* 245 fee, msl. Site 2D is
located w,,h,n 450 fee, of bo«h groundwa,er sampling .ocations. Although groundwaKr was no?
_d .o a depth of 30 fee, a, Si,e 2D, the depth ,o groundwa,er a,L site is eslT ,7
be My close ,o 30 fee, based on d» dep,h ,o groundwater a, Si,es ,F and 20. The same aquL
encountered a, Sites IF and 20 is expected to underlie Site 2D.
2.6.5.3.2 Soil Results
This section discusses ana,y,ical results torn soil sampHng a, She 2D. Resute are summarized
m F,gure 2-17, which presenu detected o^anics and any inorganics exceeding risk/hazard
criic
No organic compounds were detected in soil samples from Site 2D (Figure 2-17).
Inorganfc;
Arsenic was detected in II of 12 samples and beryllium was detected in 2 of I2sampleSat '
concentration, exceeding PROS bu, 8enerally be,ow or near background. Arsenic and bery.lium .
each exceeded background once.
2.6.5.3.3 Groundwater Results
One groundwater sample was collected from temporary groundwater well 1FGWT-01 at Site IF
to represent conditions at both Sites IF and 2D. Analytical results are discussed in
SecUon 2.4. 1 .3.4 and are summarized in Figures 2-4 and 2-17.
2.6.5.3.4 Ecological Results
Vegetation on Site 2D burned in a brushfire in June 1 997, prior to the fifth survey visit Most of
the onginal habitat (coastal sage scrub) was burned. Prior to the fire, disturbed habitat was found
on the sue and was sparsely vegetated with fennel, coyote brush, thistle, mustard, and wild oat.
No coastal California gnatcatchers were observed on Site 2D during surveys prior to the fire
Habitat destroyed by the fire was considered marginal. Although no least Bell's vireos were
observed on site, surveys conducted in 1996 identified least Bell's vireos in riparian vegetation
along Pulgas Creek, approximately 1,000 feet downstream from the site.
SCI/1 -99/WPCVPendleto/ROD 12199 wpd 2-85
-------
2.6.5.3.5 Summary
No organics were detected in soil; arsenic and beryllium were the only inorganic compounds
detected, but concentrations were near background. Groundwater data for Site 1F are also
representative of Site 2D groundwater. No site-specific contamination was detected in
groundwater. Accordingly, no evidence of site-related contamination was observed at Site 2D.
2.6.5.4 Summary of Risks Associated with Site 2D
Human health and ecological risk assessments were conducted for Site 2D using data collected
during the Group D RI. Risk assessment methodologies are summarized in Section 2.4.1.4. Risk
assessment summaries for Site 2D are presented in this section.
2.6.5.4.1 Human Health Risk Characterization
-eePCs-in-Sne^ son are urnited to metals. Current/future workers and future residents could
be exposed to.soil contaminants through incidental ingestion, dermal contact, and inhalation of
particulates.
The cumulative residential risk for maximum detected COPCs is 3.lxlO'5. The primary risk
drivers are arsenic (approximately 66 percent of the total risk) and beryllium (approximately
44 percent of the total risk), both of which exceeded background concentrations for the Las
Flores Basin once but are not considered COPCs for the expected waste streams at this site.
Excluding the portion of total risk attributable to background metals, the ILCR is U x IO"5 The
95 percent UCL soil concentration for arsenic is 4.3 mg/kg. The 95 percent UCL concentration
for arsenic and the maximum concentration for beryllium are close to the 95th percentile
background concentrations (4.25 and 1.2 mg/kg, respectively). From ground surface to 10 feet
the depth of interest for the HHRA, beryllium was detected in only one of nine samples, at a
concentration of 1.5 mg/kg. Although arsenic was detected in nine of nine samples within the
same depth interval (10 feet), it exceeded background in only one sample. Excluding the portion
of total risk attributable to background, the incremental residential risk is 2x10"* and is solely
attributable to beryllium; this risk value is at the lower end of the risk management range.
The cumulative residential hazard for maximum detected COPCs in soil is 1.1. This estimated
hazard is primarily attributable to aluminum (approximately 43 percent of the total hazard)
arsenic (approximately 23 percent of the total hazard), manganese (approximately 10 percent of
the total hazard), and vanadium (approximately 17 percent of the total hazard). Excluding the
portion of total hazard attributable to background metals, the incremental residential site hazard
SCI/l-99AVPC/Pendl«o/RODl2!99.wpd 2-86
-------
is 0.5, which is below the threshold criterion of 1.0. The maximum lead concentration
(103 mg/kg) is less than the EPA and Cal/EPA residential PRGs of 400 and 130 mg/kg,
respectively.
The cumulative industrial risk and hazard for maximum detected COPCs are 4.7x10'6 and 0.55,
respectively. Arsenic and beryllium are the main contributors. Excluding background
concentrations, the risk is l.SxlO'6. Using the 95 percent UCL soil concentrations and excluding
background, the industrial risk is 3xlO'7. The industrial risk is below the tower end of the risk
management range, and the hazard is less than the threshold criterion of 1.0.
Soil at Site 2D is considered protective of human health for the following reasons:
The HI is less than 1.0 and the maximum lead concentration is less than the EPA
screening value.
The incremental cancer risk for the residential scenario (2x IO'6) is at the lower end of
the risk management range.
The only significant contributors to cancer risk are arsenic and beryllium, which were
detected at concentrations that are very close to background concentrations.
Arsenic was detected in nine of nine samples to a depth of 10 feet but only once at a
concentration exceeding background and beryllium was detected only once at 10 feet.
Site 2D is adjacent to Site 1F and the groundwater contaminants characterized for Site 1F are
used as the groundwater COPCs for Site 2D. The COPCs detected in groundwater at Site IF are
limited to metals. Future residents could be exposed to groundwater contaminants through
ingestion.
The residential ILCR from ingestion of groundwater is 5.2x10'4 and is completely attributable to
arsenic. However, the maximum reported groundwater concentration of arsenic (23.4 ug/1) is
below the MCL (50 ug/1, which corresponds to an incremental cancer risk of IxlO'3).
The total noncarcinogenic health hazard is 3.8 and is primarily attributable to arsenic (55 percent
of the total hazard) and boron (26 percent of the total hazard). Although the HI exceeds 1.0, the
maximum groundwater concentration of arsenic is below the MCL and would not likely
represent a threat to human health via ingestion. Furthermore, boron is not expected to be
SCI/1-99/WPC/Pendleta/RODI2199. wpd 2-87
-------
present in groundwater as a result of site-related activities. Therefore, groundwater at Site 2D is
considered protective of human health.
2.6.5.4.2 Ecological Risk Assessment
The EcoRA for Site 2D was revised based on additional data collected in May and June 1997
(SWDIV 1998a). Most of the HQs that exceed 1.0 are in the 1 to 10 range, indicating a low
potential for toxicity. All preliminary COPECs detected are metals and most had relatively high
frequencies of detection (greater than 80 percent).
Site 2D is presumed to have been primarily coastal sage scrub, but had been disturbed by burning
prior to the habitat evaluations. Birds were observed, but special-status species are not expected
to be present on sue because of the site disturbance. The final risk screening results indicated
that modified PLEs were exceeded for plants, invertebrates, Belding's savannah sparrow and
deermouse. Preliminary COPECs with HQs exceeding 1.0 are shown in Figure 2-17. '
HQs for aluminum exceeded 1.0 for plants (5.9), invertebrates (3.9), and mammals (7 4)-
however, only one detection of aluminum exceeded background and, thus, the overall risk from
aluminum was determined to be low. The HQ for cobalt exceeded 1.0 for mammals (1.7) at one
location and was partially due to background. The overall risk from cobalt was determined to be
ow HQs for iron exceeded 1.0 for plants (3.8), invertebrates (1.03), birds (3.6), and mammals
(16). Most of the nsk was due to background concentrations; the overall risk due to iron was
determined to be low. HQs for lead exceeded 1.0 for mammals (1.5 to 8.7). The average
concentration of site-related lead resulted in an HQ less than 1.0. The overall site risk due to lead
was determined to be low. The HQ for vanadium exceeded 1.0 for mammals (3.1) but was
mostly due to background. The average site concentration of vanadium results in an HQ less
than 1.0, and the overall risk due to vanadium was determined to be low.
No final COECs were identified at Site 2D. The risk to ecological receptors was determined to
be low.
2.6.5.5 Description of the No Action Alternative
The no action alternative selected for Site 2D includes no institutional controls. Site 2D is
considered protective of human health and the environment for the following reasons-
SCI/1 -99/WPOPendleto/ROD 12199.wpd 2-88
-------
The HI for soil is less than 1.0, and the maximum lead concentration in soil is below
the screening criteria.
The incremental cancer risk (2x10'6) for soil under the residential scenario is at the
lower end of the risk management range. The only significant contributors to soil
cancer risk are arsenic and beryllium at concentrations that are close to background
concentrations. Arsenic was detected in nine of nine soil samples to a depth of
10 feet but only once at a concentration exceeding background, and beryllium was
detected only once at a depth of 10 feet.
Groundwater was determined to be protective of human health based on background
contribution of the risk contributors and assuming that there is no current or planned
future use o f groundwater at the site.
Evaluation of potential ecological risks from exposure to soil identified no COECS.
Site 2F - Grease Disposal Pit in 62 Area
Site 2F consists of a former grease disposal pit in the 62 Area.
2.6.6.1 Site Name, Location, and Description
Site 2F - Grease Disposal Pit in 62 Area, is located approximately 1,200 feet north of San Mateo
Road (Figure I-2). The grease disposal pit is approximately 100 feet long and 75 feet wide. The
site is bordered on the east by a paved road and Site IH, on the north and west by moderate to
dense vegetation, and to the south by vegetation and San Mateo Road. The surrounding area is
characterized by low rolling hills.
No perennial surface water is present in the vicinity of Site 2F. The area receives only low
annual rainfall, primarily during the winter months. Surface water at the site is generally
ephemeral and follows the gently sloping ground surface to the south. During significant rainfall
events, surface water percolates into the subsurface, evaporates, or runs off the site and
eventually discharges into San Mateo Creek.
The 62 Area grease pit is no longer in operation, and military and civilian personnel are present
on site only occasionally. The undeveloped area surrounding the site is classified as a maneuver
area and is covered by natural vegetation (Innis-Tennebaum Architects, Inc., 1990). Site IH is
east of Site 2F. The area south of Site 2F contains several hundred buildings that are used for a
variety of purposes, including personnel training, troop housing, mess, recreation, and
SCI/1 -99/WPC-Tendle[o/RODI2199.wpd 2-89
-------
™™ LN° frily h
-------
The nearest RI site at which groundwater was encountered is Site 34 (groundwater level of
12 feet below ground surface), which is approximately 1.25 miles south of Site 2F. Because
Site 2F is topographically higher than Site 34 by about 230 feet, the groundwater table at Site 2F
is expected to be deeper than 200 feet below ground surface.
No other site-specific groundwater level data were collected in the San Mateo Basin near Site 2F.
However, the alluvial units and underlying bedrock at Site 2F are not expected to receive or
retain a significant or beneficial amount of groundwater. Groundwater in the San Mateo Basin is
concentrated primarily in the alluvium along the basin floor (where Site 34 is located) and not in
adjacent topographically elevated areas (where Site 2F is located).
2.6.6.3.2 Soil Results
This section discusses analytical results from soil sampling at Site 2F. Results are summarized in
Figure 2-18, which presents detected organics and any inorganics that exceed risk/hazard criteria.
The initial 10 soil samples and 1 duplicate were used for site characterization. The additional 12
soil samples were used to characterize background.
Organics
No organic compounds were detected in soil at concentrations exceeding PRGs (Figure 2-18),
but 11 organics were detected at concentrations below the evaluation criteria: acetone,
2-butanone, 4-methyl-2-pentanone, ethylbenzene, toluene, total xylenes, chrysene,
2-methylnaphthalene, phenanthrene, diethylphthalate, and dimethylphthalate. Of these
11 compounds, phenanthrene was reported at the highest concentration (12 mg/kgj.
Inorganics
Concentrations of arsenic in 9 of 11 samples and beryllium in all 11 samples exceeded PRGs in
soil (Figure 2-18). Beryllium concentrations were below the background concentration of
1.42 mg/kg. Three arsenic detections exceeded the Santa Margarita Basin background
concentration of 4.25 mg/kg. The highest arsenic concentration was 15 mg/kg.
Arsenic was detected in all 12 site-specific background samples. The site-specific background
concentrations ranged from 1.4 to 10.9 mg/kg. The 95th percentile of the site-specific
background concentration was calculated to be 10.9 mg/kg using equation 13.24 from Gilbert
(1987) and assuming a lognormal distribution. This result was compared against arsenic
concentrations detected during the 1996 RI. The site-specific background concentration was
SCI/l-99AVPC/Pendlew/ROD12l99.wpd 2-91
-------
exceeded by three detected concemn*ions a, Site 2F (,5 , 1 8 a „ , ,
duphcate sample of the maximum detected cone 7 ""^ However.
W percent UCL of the mean aTnic ? "T" "" "" *" te^ound. The
' 0.9
be
.
concentration. a to te site-specific
Sc/mmao. of Risks Associated with Site
and inhalation of VOCs or lnCdCTK' ingra'iOn'
14 percent of the total ris., nuwever arc - Jt_
»««•/. nuwever, arsenic and bervflinm a~ -.u-
concentrations anH ar* r,~. -j w«yi"um are within
rations and are not considered COPCs for the exoeci
Excluding the portion of total risk attributabl ""* sireams at this site-
maximum detected COPCs is less than TV m^ *° aCkgrOUnd metals'the incremental site risk for
The cumulative residential hazard is 1.2.
Excluding the
~~ — - -v»»«4 ffftr^f*• i xrrnnttvrkt^iA. *_ i •
1 metals, the
T... -.„, wxucn is oeiow the threshold criterion of 1.0.
SCJ/NWWPC/Pcndlelo/RODUW.wpd 2-92
-------
The cumulative industrial risk for maximum detected COPCs is 7.2x10-* and is primarily
attributable to arsenic (approximately 89 percent of the total risk) and beryllium (approximately
11 percent of the total risk). Excluding the portion of total risk attributable to background
metals, the incremental industrial site risk is less than IxlO'6. The incremental industrial hazard
for maximum detected COPCs is 0.04.
Based on the results of the HHRA, the incremental site risks are within the risk management
range and the incremental site hazards are below the threshold criterion of 1.0 under both the
residential and industrial exposure scenarios. In addition, the maximum lead concentration
(25.8 mg/kg) is below the screening criteria. Therefore, Site 2F soil is considered protective of
human health under both the residential and industrial land use scenarios.
Groundwater is not considered a complete exposure pathway for either current/future workers or
future residents. Groundwater sampling was not performed at Site 2F during the RI because
drilling refusal occurred in weathered bedrock at less than 50 feet below ground surface, before
encountering sufficient groundwater for sampling purposes. Site 2F is not located above a
shallow aquifer associated with any of the four major groundwater basins at MCB Camp
Pendleton (i.e., San Mateo, San Onofre, Las Flores, or Santa Margarita Basin). The site is.
topographically higher than and isolated from the aquifers associated with these major basins.
Therefore, groundwater at Site 2F was not evaluated further in the HHRA and is considered
protective of human health.
2.6.6.4.2 Ecological Risk Assessment
Three preliminary COPECs (arsenic, 2-methylnaphthaIene, and phenanthrene) had HQs
exceeding 1.0 (Figure 2-18). HQs were calculated for representative species for each of nine soil
samples. The HQs that exceed 1.0 are all close to 1.0, indicating that the potential for toxicity is
relatively low. Arsenic had a relatively high frequency of detection (90 percent) but is
considered to be within background. Although HQs for phenanthrene and 2-methylnaphthalene
exceed 1.0, these compounds were detected in only one of nine samples collected at depths of
ecological concern.
Site 2F is predominantly normative grasslands. Representative species for this site with HQs
exceeding 1.0 include plants, terrestrial invertebrates, deer mouse, and Savannah sparrow.
SCI/l-99/WPC/Pendlcto/RODI2l99.wpd 2-93
-------
None of the preliminary COPECs were retained as final COECs because the potential for
exposure and effects is considered low for the chemicals and exposure pathways present. HQs
for most of the chemicals detected are less than 1.0, indicating little or no potential toxicity and
those that exceed 1.0 are relatively low. The size of this site is approximately 0.14 acre, which is
smaller than the home ranges for the representative mammal and bird receptor species (deer
mouse and Savannah sparrow). Given the habitat quality of the site and surrounding areas, these
receptors would likely be present on the site for only limited periods of time. Therefore,
ecological receptors are not expected to suffer adverse effects because they would not be' exposed
to site contaminants on a consistent basis.
2.6.6.5 Description of the No Action Alternative
The no action alternative selected for Site 2F includes no institutional controls. Site 2F is
considered protective of human health and the environment for the following reasons:
Under the residential scenario, the incremental cancer risk for soil is less than IxlO"6.
• Excluding background, the HI for soil is less than 1.0 and the maximum lead
concentration in soil is less than the screening criteria.
- Groundwater was determined to be protective of human health based on the depth to
groundwater and the lack of significant soil contamination. There is no current or
planned future use of groundwater at the site.
Evaluation of potential ecological risks from exposure to soil identified no COECS
and indicated that the site is protective of ecological receptors.
2.6.7 Site 2G - Grease Disposal Pit in 31 Area
Site 2G consists of a former grease disposal pit in the 31 Area.
2.6.7.1 Site Name, Location, and Description
Site 2G - Grease Disposal Pit in 31 Area, is located southwest of the Marine Corps Tactical
System Support Activity (MCTSSA), along an unpaved dirt road approximately 0.75 mile
southwest of Stuart Mesa Road (Figure 1-2). The grease disposal pit is approximately 190 feet
long and 115 feet wide. Site 2G is located in a stream-cut canyon surrounded by a gently sloping
marine terrace. The site is bordered on the northeast by the MCTSSA, on the east and southeast
by agricultural fields, on the north by light to moderate vegetation, and on the west and south by
the Pacific Ocean, which is about 300 feet from the site.
SCI/l-99/WPC7P«idleto/RODI2199.wpd 2-94
-------
The grease pit is no longer in operation, and military and civilian personnel are present on site
only occasionally. The undeveloped area surrounding the site on the north, northeast, and east is
classified as a clear zone for operation of various types of radar associated with MCTSSA. The
agricultural outlease area east and southeast of the site consists of a marine terrace covered by
natural vegetation (Innis-Tennebaum Architects, Inc., 1990). The nearest family housing, Stuart
Mesa Housing, is approximately 1.5 miles northeast of the site. Troop housing is located'
approximately 0.5 mile north of the site.
No perennial surface water is present in the vicinity of Site 2G. Surface water at the site is
ephemeral. Runoff originating from the agricultural fields or from significant rainfall events
flows into the intermittent stream-cut canyon and discharges into the Pacific Ocean, percolates
into the subsurface, or evaporates. No base production wells are located within the Cockleburr
Basin or within a 1-mile radius of Site 2G.
Disturbed habitat is the dominant habitat at Site 2G. The site is vegetated by a variety of ice
plants, including buckwheat, wild oat, brome, common reed, tree tobacco, ice plant, and curly
dock. Except for the normative grasses, most of the vegetation is confined to the arroyo that
traverses the site. No special-status species are expected to be present at this site.
2.6.7.2 Site History and Enforcement Activities
Site history and enforcement activities for grease disposal pits are described in Section 2.6.4.2.
2.6.7.3 Summary of Site Characteristics
Site 2G was investigated in June and July 1996 during the RI for Group D sites. A total of 10
soil samples were collected from three boring locations and one surface location (Figure 2-19).
Soil samples were analyzed for metals, VOCs, and SVOCs. A groundwater sample was
collected from a temporary well placed in an estimated downgradient location (Figure 2-19). The
water sample was analyzed for the same parameters as soil, plus general chemistry. A habitat
and receptor survey was conducted to identify wildlife present on site.
2.6.7.3.1 Geology and Hydrogeotogy
Shallow geology at this site is characterized by semiconsolidated alluvium consisting of very fine
grained to fine-grained sand, sand with silt, gravel, and clay. Based on site geology, groundwater
is assumed to flow to the southwest, following surface topography. Groundwater was
encountered at a depth of 14 feet below ground surface in the three borings completed at the site
SCl/l-99AVPC/Pendleto/RODI2l99.wpd 2-95
-------
and at approximate., 2 fee, bejow ground surface in temporary wel! 2QOWT-0, which was
Placed m a shallow location on the beach near the center of the canyon.
2.6.7.3.2 Soil Results
resuits ftom soii
No organic compounds were detected in soil at Site 2G.
Arsenic was detected in two of eight samples and beryll
um as etecte n
2. 6. 7.3.3 Groundwater Results
No organic compounds were detected in the groundwater sa^pfe from Site 2O (Figure 2-, 9)
W* ,he excepuon of arsenic, no inorganics were detected a, concentrations exceeding MCLs
.ap-wattl ^PROs (Figure 2-19^ Arsenic was detected a, a concentration of ,6.9^ wh"h
exceeds the tap-water PRO of 0.045 ug/l but is below the MCL of 50 ug/l.
2.6.7.3.4 Summary
No organics were detected in soil; arsenic and beryllium were the only inorganic compounds
deeted, u, concenuations were be,ow background. With «,e excetion of
or
exception of a.eni
^
n
2.6.7.4 Summary of Risks Associated with Site 2G
Human health aBd ecological risk assessments were conducted for Site 2O using data coec
dunng the Group D W. Risk assessment methodologies a« summari^ in Section 2 4
assessment summaries for Site 2O are presented in this section ••'•»•
SCI/I -99AVPC/Pendleto/ROD 12199.wpd 2-96
-------
2.6.7.4.1 Human Health Risk Characterization
COPCs in Site 2G soil are limited to metals. Current/future workers and future residents could
be exposed to soil contaminants through incidental ingestion, dermal contact, and inhalation of
particulates.
The cumulative residential risk for the maximum detected COPCs is l.lxlO'5 and is primarily
attributable to arsenic (approximately 64 percent of the total risk) and beryllium (approximately
36 percent of the total risk). The maximum detected concentrations of these metals are less than
Site 2G background concentrations; there are no site-related carcinogenic COPCs after exclusion
of naturally occurring background.
The cumulative residential HI from the maximum detected metals is l.O. Excluding the portion
of total risk attributable to background metals, the incremental residential site hazard for
maximum detected metals is 0. 1 4, which is below the threshold criterion of 1 .0.
The Site 2G residential cancer risk and noncarcinogenic hazard are less than the risk and hazard
criteria. In addition, the maximum lead concentration in soil (16.2 mg/kg) is below residential
screening criteria. Therefore, Site 2G soil is considered protective of human health.
The COPCs detected in groundwater at Site 2G are limited to metals. Future residents could be
exposed to groundwater contaminants through ingestion.
The cumulative residential cancer risk from ingestion of groundwater is S.SxlQ-4 and is
completely attributable to arsenic. However, the maximum reported groundwater concentration
of arsenic (16.9 ug/1) is below the MCL (50 ug/1, which corresponds to an incremental cancer
risk of IxlO'3). Furthermore, because the maximum detected concentration of arsenic in soil is
within naturally occurring background, the groundwater concentration of arsenic is also likely
naturally occurring. The total noncarcinogenic hazard associated with ingestion of groundwater
is 1 .9 and is primarily attributable to arsenic (1.5 HI). Because arsenic in groundwater is likely
naturally occurring, groundwater at Site 2G is considered protective of human health.
2. 6. 7.4. 2 Ecological Risk Assessment
Site 2G is within the background area for marine terrace deposits; background values were
available for 16 of the 17 inorganic chemicals detected in site soils. Background values were not
SCI/l-99AVPC/Pcndleto/ROD12l99.wpd 2-97
-------
po,en,ia, toxicitv. ' " Prem1"^ "** COPECs were eva/uated for
•a, exceed , .0 are a,, ,ess than , 0, with the ex ep ' Md ^ ^«
deer mouse). Iron and anc had relatively hi i, f P m'S> m» •—* •* boron
reuined M finai COECS - »*
On,y TOO HQs exceed ,0 and , he
de.ec.ed in a,, six sa.p.es, HQs *m
toxicity range (I to 10) at two localion, ^ • T '"cations, in the low
location. T1,e HQs for zi " eTl 7 T V med'Unl '°XiCiIy "* (I° to
co S'"8'ePeCiK' ^ *" —
contaminated area is a * K' " — T1* -
" "
tna, t^ the site , he
consider^ sraa,,er Aan fc hom~
ies for this site. None of the eco "^sentative bird or mammal
2.S.7.5 Oescrfpffon of tt, «o /Icffon AltemiOv
ine no action alternative selected for Site 20 i
"
No site-related carcinogens were detected.
SCI/|-99/WPC/Pendlelo/ROD12l99.Wpd 2-98
-------
The incremental residential site-related hazard for maximum metals concentrations is
below the threshold criterion of 1.0.
The maximum lead concentration in soil is below residential screening criteria.
Arsenic was the only contributor to the risk and hazard for groundwater but was
determined to be naturally occurring.
There is no potential use for groundwater at the site. Site 2G is close to the ocean and
is not in a beneficial use zone, primarily because of .the potential for saltwater
intrusion.
Evaluation of potential ecological risks from exposure to soil identified no COECS
and indicated that the site is protective of ecological receptors.
2.6.8 Site 10 - 26 Area Sewage Sludge Composting Yard
Site 10 was used for composting sewage sludge.
2.6.8.1 Site Name, Location, and Description
Site 10-26 Area Sewage Sludge Composting Yard, is located in 26 Area, approximately
600 feet southwest of the intersection of Vandegrift Boulevard and Santa Margarita Road
(Figure 1-2). The site consists of a level, open field. A pile of sewage sludge approximately
100 feet long, 90 feet wide, and 15 feet high was removed in 1997 from the site area and placed
at Box Canyon landfill on base. The site is bordered on the north and west by graded piles of
concrete mixing facility materials, light vegetation, and an unpaved road; on the east by moderate
vegetation; and farther east by a ridge that rises up to 250 feet above the composting yard. South
of the site is the 26 Area maintenance yard, which is surrounded by a chain-link fence. The site
slopes gently to the southwest, parallel to the Santa Margarita River, and eventually drains into
the river farther downstream. The Santa Margarita River is approximately 2,500 feet west,
Sites 3 and 28 are southwest, and Site 24 is northeast of the composting yard.
The only perennial surface water in the vicinity of Site 10 is the Santa Margarita River.
Ephemeral water is often visible in pools during the rainy season. During significant rainfall
events, surface water percolates into the subsurface, evaporates, or runs off the site and
eventually discharges into the Santa Margarita River.
SCI/I-99/WPC/PendJcto/RODI2l99.Wfxj 2-99
-------
housing areas are the Vado Del Rio (25) and 24 Are
srassland
.
of eucalyptus trees. During surveys 21 ,n^' f u- 7 "S 3 SmaH grove
and Ca.ifon.ia ,owhee J Z^ " °" *' ^
e
2.6.«.2 Site History and Enforcement Activities
2.6.8.3 Summary of Site Characteristics
SCI/1.99/WPC/PendlMo/RODi2l99.Wpd 2-100
-------
gasoline. SPLP and deionized waste extraction test (DI WET) Jeachabjlity analyses were
conducted on samples from resampled locations where diesel, SVOCs, and lead were detected
during the Phase 1 RI. No sediment or surface-water samples were collected because no surface
water was present on site. Two groundwater monitoring wells were installed and three rounds of
groundwater samples were collected during 1994 (Figure 2-20). The groundwater samples were
analyzed for metals, VOCs, SVOCs, TPH as diesel and gasoline, and general chemistry. Two
sets of plants and invertebrates were collected at random locations from the sludge pile. The
biota samples (plants and invertebrates) were analyzed for metals, PCBs, and pesticides.
2.6.8.3.1 Geology and Hydrogeology
Geology at Site 10 consists primarily of stream-deposited alluvium of Holocene age. The
predominant tithology is poorly graded to well-graded sand, with discontinuous lenses of lower
permeability silty sand, silt, and clay. Poorly graded sand and less abundant lenses of low-
permeability sand (e.g., silty sand and clayey sand), silt, and clay underlie the sludge composting
yard. The shallow geology indicates that Site 10 is underlain by up to 10 feet of strata consisting
predominantly of sill and clay. The fine-grained strata are unsaturated. The top 10 to 20 feet of
the saturated portion of the aquifer occurs within strata consisting primarily of sand.
No borings were advanced to bedrock at Site 10; however, borings at Group A Site 24 in the
Santa Margarita River floodplain and within 1 mile of Site 10 encountered the La Jolla Group,
suggesting that the alluvium is up to 50 feet thick.
The La Jolla Group crops out on hillsides surrounding the 26 Area. This unit consists of fine- to
medium-grained sandstone interbedded with silty sandstone, clayey sandstone, siltstone, and
claystone.
Site 10 is located on the alluvial plain of the Santa Margarita Basin, on the east edge of the Upper
subbasin. The groundwater flow direction beneath the site is primarily southwest, parallel to the
long axis of the basin. Local groundwater flow is southwest, parallel to the long axis of the
basin, and is consistent with regional flow, which is parallel to the long axis of the Upper
subbasin.
SCI/1 -99/WPC/P«ndleto/ROD 121 W.wpd 2-101
-------
2.6.8.3.2 Soil Results
Organics
In action ft. fonowing 25 organics were detected in Site ,0 soil but a, concentrations be.ow
PROs: acetone, 2-butanone, toluene, benzoic acid, biS(2-ethylhexyl>DhthaIate
of PCP (32
4,300 .ng^g) and ,he only delections of N-niUo^-n-p g
benzoCaJpyrene (6.4 mg/kg), and 2,4^1uiitrotoluene (2.5 mg*g).
Sample location 108-03 was resampW during the Phase 2 W (sample ,OSS003) fcr SVOC
««. On,y b^.ethy.hexyDpnfta.ate (2.3
. ny .etyexyDpnfta.ate (2.3 mg^g) rad 4-cWoroanUine (,.7
detected. BenzoWpyrene, 2,4.dini,ro,o,Uene, N-nto^i-n.pn.py.a,,,^;^
*• PROS -
,S round of samplmg. In an effort to confirm «hese results, the same .ocation was samp.ed a
PLPsTorT'^T^ ^'^ fW mUM- SPLP-dteK'- - SVOC^
SPLP SVOCs. Total and leachable diese! concentrations were 100 mgflcg and 2 8 mg/l
3 VOC.
— -»-• (- sample
' «
SCI/I -99/WPC/Pendleto/ROD 12199. wpd 2-102
-------
Although diesel was detected in soil at leachable concentrations, no leachable semiyolatile
organic compounds were detected, indicating that no toxic constituents of diesel were leachable.
No volatile organics or semivolatile organic constituents of diesel were detected in groundwater.
Therefore, the diesel concentrations detected in soil are not considered a threat to groundwater or
human health. Diesel was evaluated in the ecological risk assessment and was determined not to
be a significant threat to the environment.
Inorganics
Out of the 23 samples analyzed for metals, concentrations of arsenic in 6 samples, beryllium in
14 samples, lead in 1 sample, and manganese in 1 sample exceeded PRGs (Figure 2-20).
Arsenic was detected in surface samples from six boring locations and at depth in one boring
location at concentrations exceeding the PRO but below background. Although beryllium
concentrations exceeded the PRO in several samples at Site 10, the concentrations were only
slightly higher than the regional background concentration (1.42 mg/kg); the maximum
concentration for beryllium was 2^2 mg/kg.
Antimony, barium, chromium, copper, lead, mercury, molybdenum, silver, and zinc exceeded
ecological screening criteria (Figure 2-21).
2.6.8.3.3 Groundwater Results
No organics detected in groundwater exceeded MCLs or tap-water PRGs (Figure 2-20). Benzoic
acid was detected once in well 10W-02 (approximate groundwater level of 8 feet below ground
surface) and bis(2-ethylhexvl)phthalate, butylbenzylphthalate, and diethylphthalate were detected
once in well 10W-01 (approximate groundwater level of 7 feet below ground surface). No other
organics were detected in Site 10 groundwater.
No inorganics exceeded MCLs; however, arsenic and beryllium were detected at concentrations
exceeding tap-water PRGs (Figure 2-20).
Beryllium was detected twice (2 and 2.2 Mg/l) in well 10W-01 at concentrations exceeding the
tap-water PRO. Arsenic was detected twice (3.3 and 2.8 ug/1) in well 10W-01 and twice (3.7 and
4.4 ug/l) in well 1OW-02 at concentrations exceeding the tap-water PRG.
SCI/I-99AVPC/Pendleto/RODI2l99.wpd 2-103
-------
2.6.8.3.4 Biota Results
.
2.6.8.3.5 Summary
"" deteC'Cd '"
" «—— -ceding
and two morgarucs were detected in Site 10 groundwaler
- . . - - t,'v'fc""-"r'aitl uui at
MCLs.
2.6.8.4 Summary of Risks Associated with Site 10
Human health and ecological risk assessments were conducted for Site 10 u«no ,,,„'.,
during the Group C and Group DRIs. " • I Ous.ng data collected
4,R -
Sect,on 2.4.1.4. R,sk assessment summaries for Site 10 are presented in this section.
2.6.8.4.1 Human Health Risk Characterization
' lod
n • •» e
p,,e were no, ,n=,uded in the human heahh assessment because of the pianned removai of
h Mr, ? turc workr and futurc rcsidents c°uid be <^ •
h ,nc,dental mgestmn, dermal contact, and inhalation of VOCs or particulates.
The cumulative residential risk from the maximum detected COPCs in soil is 7 2x!0" and is
pnmanly annbutabl, to arsenic (approximately , , percent of U,e tota, risk,, bery, 1 "2
percent of the tota, risk), N-nitroso-di-n-propy^ine (approximately 42 plnTof u7e a, Hsk,
PCP (approx,ma,e,y » percent of the tota, risk,, and W-dinitrotoiuene (approximately 5 pe±
SCl/1.99/WPC/Pendlclo/ROD12I99.wpd 2-104
-------
of the total nsk). Arsenic is below the associated background concentration and was excluded
from the risk evaluation as naturally occurring. N-nitroso-di-n-propylamine has been shown to
be a laboratory contaminant in the past, was detected only once during the Group C Phase 1 Rl
and has never been associated with site-related activities. Both PCP and 2,4-dinitrotoluene were
detected only once at concentrations exceeding PRGs. The sample location (10SB003 surface
sample) at which these compounds were detected was resampled twice during the Group D RI
but no detections of these compounds were reported. Therefore, N-nitroso-di-n-propylamine
PCP, and 2,4-dinitrotoluene were excluded from the risk evaluation. Excluding the portion of
total risk attributable to background metals and to N-nitroso-di-n-propylamine, PCP and
2,4-dinitrotoluene, the incremental residential site risk is 6x10*. The only contributor exceeding
I x 10« is beryllium. The maximum detected beryllium concentration is 2.2 mg/kg and exceeds
the background concentration of 1.42 mg/kg by only 0.78 mg/kg.
The cumulative residential noncarcinogenic hazard from maximum detected COPCs is 2 4 and is
primarily attributable to metals (approximately 92 percent of the total hazard). Excluding the
portion of total hazard attributable to background metals, the incremental residential site hazard
is 1.3, just above the threshold criterion of 1.0. However, the incremental residential hazard (site
total hazard minus the hazard attributable to background metals) is below the threshold criterion
of 1.0 for each target organ, indicating that soil COPCs will not result in adverse health effects
for nature residential land use.
The cumulative industrial cancer risk from maximum detected COPCs is 1.6x10-'. Excluding the
portion of total risk attributable to background metals and N-nitroso-di-n-propylamine, PCP, and
2,4-dinitrotoluene, the incremental industrial site risk is IxlO'6. The cumulative noncarcinogenic
hazard from maximum detected COPCs is 0.41 and is primarily attributable to metals.
Excluding the portion of total hazard attributable to background metals, the incremental
industrial site hazard is 0.15.
The results of the HHRA indicate that the incremental residential (6x10'*) risk at Site 10 is within
the risk management range and the incremental residential site hazard by target organ is below
the threshold criterion of 1.0. In addition, the maximum reported lead concentration (95 mg/kg)
is below screening criteria. Based on the results of the HHRA, Site 10 soil is considered
protective of human health.
SCI/I -99/WPC/Pendlcto/ROD 12199.wpd 2-105
-------
Detected I COPCs in groundwater include meals and SVOC, Fu,ure residen,s could be exposed
to groundwaler contaminants through ingestion.
The cumulative residential cancer risk from ingestion of groundwater is 2.4x,0^ and is primary
The total noncarcinogenic heaith hazard is 1.4 and is primarily attributable to metals in
groundwater, specifically manganese (HQ 0.7 .) and arsenic (HQ 0.4). The incremental
res,dem,al hazard is below the threshold criterion of , .0 for each targe, organ evaluated
2.6.8.4.2 Ecological Risk Assessment
^T"' T 'he maln P0rti°" "" * r P"P°«S • *°RA. The
ge p,,e has hm,,ed ecological habitat but was included in ,he EcoRA because h could
Prov,de prey items (e.g.. soil invertebrates) for secondary receptors. Samples coUected from
TT-_ r-r>m?/~. , ^ 6 "" "11" OUIJVV'1 m rigure 2-21.
The COPECs are mostly metals but include maximum detected concentrations of diesel and PCP
a one location Most chemicals were not considered COECs because they had a low frequency
of detection anchor of exceeding an HQ of 1.0, average concentrations that resulted in HQs J
than or close to 1.0, or were not found in tissue samples representing species of concern The
mam comnbutors to ecological risk are lead, copper and zinc. Representative species for this site
wnh HQs exceeding 1.0 include plant, terrestrialinvertebrates, C^ft^^J^™"*
American robin, and Swainson's hawk.
The HQs for lead and mercury in soil in areas of concern at the Site 10 main site and sludge pile
range from approximately 1.0 to 5 and |.o to 4, respectively. These HQs indicate low potential
nsk^ Average detected concentrations of lead and mercury were 46 and 2.2 mg/kg, respectively
Background concentrations of lead and mercury are 29 and 0.08 mg/kg, respectively. The site-
SCr/|.99AVPC/Pcndleto/RODl2l99.wpd 2-106
-------
.related portion of the average concentration of lead results in an HQ less than 1.0 The site-
related portion of the average concentration of mercury results in an HQ of 2.2.
TheHQs for copper range from 1.0 to 73. The average detected concentration of copper
440 mg/kg) results in an HQ of 21. The receptors of concern for copper are mammals. The
laboratory test species used to derive the PLEs for mammals is the rat. The toxicity for copper is
based on a subchronic no observed adverse effect level (NOAEL); the adverse effects measured
or observed are impairment of learning ability, hyperactivity, and behavioral aberrations. These
subtle adverse effects have not been measured in the field and are not fatal. Samples of
representative mammal species at Sites 1A and 2A, where similar or higher concentrations of
lead, copper, and mercury were detected in soil, were analyzed for these metals. The detected
concentrations in the representative species did not exceed reference concentrations This
md1Cates that these metals are not significantly bioaccumulating in mammals or their diets at the
concentrations detected in Site 10 soil and that these metals may not be in a bioavailable
chemical state for mammals.
Sewage sludge composting has not made Site 10 a favorable area for mammals. Cover
vegetation is limited relative to surrounding areas, and the site appears to be a less favorable
habitat than surrounding areas. The site is near base maintenance facilities and land use is not
likely to change from industrial use.
Although a few chemicals present a potential low to medium risk at Site 10, the overall potential
risk is low.
2.6.8.5 Description of the No Action Alternative
The no action alternative selected for Site 10 includes no institutional controls. Site 10 is
considered protective of human health and the environment for the following reasons:
• The HI for soil does not exceed the 1.0 criterion for individual target organs.
" equationiS * ^ *"* ** °f ^ NCP "^ °f !°* * I(^ for risk mana8«
• At least some portions of the main groundwater risk contributors (arsenic and
beryllium) are likely, and are assumed to be, within background.
Sq/l-99/WPC/Pendleto/RODI2»99.wpd 2-107
-------
' m
t0 the first two rounds
well
and
We" al the
concentrations is considered low.
arsenic
10,
c •» 1 /: • L j • , " •".-«««« t»/ D/fc/j Confluence and Ditch
bite 16 is the ditch and ditch confluence between Buildings 22151 and 22187.
2.6.9.1 Site Name, Location, and Description
Site 16 - 22 Area Buildings 22151 and 22187 Ditch Confluence and Ditch, is located about
0.25 mje southeast of the Marine Corps Air Station (MCAS) and approximate* 1 mile from the
Santa Margarita River (Figure .-2). Seasonal surface water flows in a highly vegetated, unlined
ditch at this site. The ditch is approximately 10 feet wide and 2 to 8 feet deep Site 16 is
adjacent to the south comer of the base motorpool and is immediately northwest of Site 17 The
nearest base production well is approximately 2 miles west-southwest of Site 16.
The site includes the Buildings 22151 and 22187 ditch confluence and ditch and an oil/water
separator. The site is bordered on the northeast side by a fenced, asphalt-paved area (motor
transportation/ maintenance facility) north of the ditches and by an asphalt parking lot south of
the ditches; on the southwest and northwest by light to moderate vegetation; and on the southeast
by grass. An elevated concrete walkway crosses perpendicular to the ditch. The Santa Margarita
River is approximately 1 mile north. Site 17 is south, and Site 27 is southwest of the ditch
confluence.
No perennial surface water is present in the vicinity of Site 16. The area receives only low
annual rainfall, primarily during winter months. Surface water at the site is generally ephemeral,
SCI/l-99/WPC/PendIeto/RODt2199.wrpd
2-108
-------
follows the gently sloping ground surface, and drains southwesterly in well-defined ditches. In
addition, the Site 16 ditch drains into the Site 27 ditches, which flow southwesterly and
eventually discharge into the Santa Margarita River. The remaining surface water either
percolates into the subsurface or evaporates. The ditch confluence between Buildings 22151 and
22187 is within the Santa Margarita River floodplain.
Land use in the vicinity of Site 16 consists of activities associated with major warehousing and
food storage functions for the base. Structures in the area include maintenance shops, motor
pools, fueling facilities, administrative buildings, scrap yards, recreation areas, troop housing,
and industrial and warehouse buildings. Military and civilian personnel are present on roads and
buildings in the vicinity of the site on a daily basis. The nearest designated troop housing areas
are located in the Chappo (22) Area, approximately 200 feet from the site. The nearest family
housing is the Ranch House, about 1.5 miles northeast of Site 16. The nearest base production
well is approximately 3,400 feet northwest of Site 16.
Site 16 contains a 30-foot-wide strip of riparian habitat that runs parallel to Avenue "D."
Cottonwood and willow are the dominant tree species; mulefat, tree tobacco, and cattail are
found in the understory. Normative grassland habitat surrounds the riparian strip and is mowed
along Avenue "D." Southeast of the riparian strip "is a small patch of coastal sage scrub.
Sagebrush, coyote brush, and deenveed are the dominant species in this habitat. During the
surveys, 17 bird species were identified. Common species include European starling, common
yellowmroat, and California towhee. A least Bell's vireo (a special-status species) was observed
in the riparian strip parallel to Avenue "D." Deer mice, western harvest mice, and house mice
were observed on site. Audubon cottontails were observed throughout the site. No amphibians
were observed. A western diamondback rattlesnake was found in a rock pile near the riparian
strip.
2.6.9.2 Site History and Enforcement Activities
Site 16 consists of a naturally occurring drainage ditch that could have received hazardous
materials from an oil/water separator and from previous operations at the base motorpool north
of the site. Adjacent to the ditch is an oil/water separator that was installed in the mid-1980s and
used until the late 1980s, when operational problems were observed. Petroleum and oil could
have spilled into the ditch during that time; however, no information is available on the
constituents or the quantity of effluent from the separator. Facilities in the area include a lube
SCI/!-99/WPC/Pendl«o/RODI2l99.wpd 2-109
-------
bay maintenance shop, auto shop, welding facility, steam-cleaning pad
rack, and auto grease rack. THese facilities have been operating £ L
or store materials such as POLs and solvents.
2.6.9.3 Summary of Site Characteristics
Site 16 was initially investigated in 1993 and 1994 during the RI for Group C sites Phase 2 RI
for metals, VOCs, SVOCs, and TPH as diese, and
conducted to identify small mammal
site.
i
,t,onal crayflsh samptes were collected at location 7 during Phase 2 to evaluate
organocKlonne pesticide (e.g., ^-DDT, bioavailabilit, a, the site
2.6.9.3.1 Geology and Hydrogeology
The geology of Site 16 consists primarily of stream-deposited alluvium of Holocene age
overiymg the La Jolla Group bedrock of Eocene age Soil at th' 't
silt andIclay deposited as discontinuous lenses. Poorlygraded ta^^^,^^
predotmnan, ...hology in the area, with discontinuous .enses of ,ower permeabUity si,^ Ld,
SCI/|.99/WPC/Pendlcto/RODI2l99.wpd 2-110
-------
silt, and clay. Poorly graded sand and less abundant lenses of low-permeability silty sand clayey
sand, s,h, and clay underlie the ditch confluence area. The La Jolla Group crops out on hillsides
surroundmg 22 Area and consists of fine- to medium-grained sandstone interbedded with silty
sandstone, clayey sandstone, siltstone, and claystone.
Site 16 is located on the alluvial plain of the Santa Margarita Basin, on the south edge of the
Chappo subbasin. The groundwater flow direction beneath the site is primarily southwest
parallel to the long axis of the basin. Local groundwater flow is west-southwest, parallel to the
long axis of the Chappo subbasin and consistent with regional groundwater flow. Depth to the
groundwater table at Site 16 ranges from 5 to 10 feet below ground surface.
Complicated localized variations in the water table were observed throughout the south side of
the Chappo subbasin, particularly along the basin edge. The water-level variations could be
caused by a combination of factors, including the lower hydraulic conductivities of the abundant
fine-gramed strata on the edge of the basin, numerous anthropogenic influences (such as
pavement and buildings) that decrease evapotranspiration in some areas, and extensive storm-
water control measures that channel and redirect surface-water flow and infiltration.
2.6.9.3.2 Soil Results
This section discusses analytical results from soil sampling at Site 16. Results are summarized in
Figure 2-22, which presents detected organics and any inorganics that exceed risk/hazard criteria.
Organ ics
With the exception of diesel, none of the organic compounds detected in Site 16 soil exceeded
evaluation criteria (Figure 2-22).
Diesel concentrations in samples from four soil borings exceeded the 100-mg/kg screening level.
"The highest diesel concentration was 1,000 mg/kg at sample location 16B-04, which exceeds the
LUFTManual guidance and the ecological screening criterion.
The following nine organics were detected in Site 16 soil at cbncentrations below the evaluation
criteria: acetone, toluene, 1,1,1-TCA, methylene chloride, benzoic acid, bis(2-ethvlhexyl)-
phthalate, butylbenzylphthalate, diethylphthalate, and 4,4'-DDT. Of these nine analytes, the
highest concentration was 0.2 mg/kg for benzoic acid.
SCI/l-99/WPC/Pcmllelo/RODI2!99 wpd 2-1 1 1
-------
Surface soil was resampled at locations I6B-04 and 16B-05 during the Phase 2 investigation
(samples 16B-04-0IRE arid 16B-05-01RE, respectively) for TPH-diesel analysis- the
corresponding analytical results were 31 and 160 mg/kg, respectively. The samples were further
analyzed for leachability via SPLP analysis for toluene, ethylbenzene, xylenes, and TCE No
VOCs were detected in the SPLP analysis, indicating that these constituents are not likely to
leach to groundwater.
Surface soil at location 16B-05 was sampled for a third time (sample 16B-05-01RE2) to evaluate
the leachability of diesel. However, diesel was not detected in the soil sample or the SPLP test.
Inorganic^
Arsenic was detected in 3 samples, beryllium in 15 samples, and lead in 1 sample out of 20 at
concentrations exceeding PRGs (Figure 2-22). No other inorganics exceeded the evaluation
criterion. . .
Arsenic was detected in surface samples from three boring locations at concentrations exceeding
the PRO but below background. Although beryllium concentrations exceeded the PRO in
several samples at She 16, concentrations were below the regional background concentration
(1.42 mg/kg) at all locations except 16B-07, where beryllium was detected in the surface and
6-foot samples at concentrations of 2.2 and 2.4 mg/kg, respectively.
The maximum lead concentration (465 mg/kg) was detected in surface soil at sample location
16B-05 and exceeded the PRG and background. Location 16B-05 was resampled (sample
16B-05-01RE) and tested for total lead and leachable lead by DI WET analysis. The total lead
concentration for the repeat sample was 35 mg/kg, but the corresponding leachable lead
concentration was 610 ug/1, which is unusually high considering the low total lead concentration
Consequently, the same location was sampled for a third time (sample 16B-05-01RE2) The
total lead concentration of 17 mg/kg confirmed the low soil concentration from the previous
resampling effort. Leachability testing using DI WET analysis detected no leachable lead. The
results are summarized below:
Sampling Round Total Lead (me/Kg) DI WET r.gad fllp/i\
Phase 1
Phase 2
3 January 1997 \j
SCf/l -99/WPC/Pendlelo/ROD 12199.wpd 2-112
vt t e ,
Phase 2 35 Not performed
-------
B«d n ,h,S testmg the ong,na, elevated lead detection is considered anomalous, as confined
by h ,ow concentrate detected during the two subdue* resampHng efforts. Given the ,ow
otal ,ead concentrate of 35 mg/kg,. leachable lead value rf ,,„ »
h,gh. Tie flna, D, WET ana,ysis da. support this contend and indicated ieaching »Z *
to groundwater ,s unlikely for lead concentrations in this range.
2.6.9.3.3 GroundwaterResults
Groundwater at Site 16 is included in OU4 and results are not presented here.
2.6.9.3.4 Surface-Water and Sediment Results
Results of surface-water and sediment samp.in6 are summarized in Figure 2-23. Because no
pathways for human exposure exist for sediment or surface water, contaminants detected in these
m^ are of concern oniy for ecologica, receptors. According the resuits are no, compared
agans, human health evaluation criteria, tnstead. the analytical results for these media L
screened against ecological risk criteria.
Diesel and 4 4'-DDT are the only organic compounds that exceeded ecological screening criteria
DKsel exceeded ecological screening criteria at three surface-water samp.e .ocations, JL a
n_, concentration of 1,580 ,g/l. The 4,4'-DDT concentration in sediment sample
16SD003 was 3.6 ug/kg, which exceeds the screening criteria.
Barium exceeded screening criteria at three sediment sample locations, with a maximum
concentration of 124 mg/kg. Barium, copper, iron, and zinc exceeded screening criteria in
surface-water samples, with maximum concentrations of 169,28.5, 2,280, and 220 ug/1
respectively. ^ '
2.6.9.3.5 Biota Results
Terrestrial plant and aquatic invertebrate samples were collected at Site 16. Biota collected from
the sue mcluded terrestrial plants and aquatic invertebrates. The maximum detected tissue
concentrates were compared with similar biota collected from reference areas. For terrestrial
plants, all reference HQs are less than 1.0, indicating that bioaccumulation from site-related
chemicals is less than that for reference areas.
SCI/!-99/WPCrT>endIeto/ROD12l99.wpd 2-1 13
-------
Aquatic invertebrates (crayfish) were compared with reference values from two different
reference areas, as well as with PLEs for ingestion by raccoons. One reference area (R8) was
located upstream of sample station 7, in an arm of .he drainage into Sites 16 and 27; this location
had not been sampled previously and was not expected to be affected by site-related activities
The second reference area (R4) was located above the inlet to the upper end of Lake O'Neill and
was used to represent background conditions for the base. Aluminum, barium, copper, and iron
at sample station 1 and nickel at station 7 exceeded both R4 and R8 reference values.
Manganese and nickel at sample station 1 and cobalt and copper at sample station 7 exceeded
only R8 reference values. Arsenic at sample station I and aluminum and silver at sample station
7 exceeded only R4 reference values. With the exception of nickel at sample station 7, reference
HQs were less than 10, indicating that tissue levels were relatively close to those at unaffected
reference areas. Tissue concentrations could be representative of local ambient concentrations
because no significant differences were observed in upstream locations compared with
downstream sample locations. In addition, the organochlorine pesticide 4,4'-DDT which
exceeded sediment PLEs at Site 27, was not detected in crayfish tissues, indicating that biota are
not bioaccumulating this chemical. A comparison of crayfish tissue concentrations against PLEs
for mgestion by raccoons indicated that concentrations could reflect general ambient conditions
because PLEs were exceeded by the same chemicals in tissues collected from both the site and
the Lake O'Neill reference area.
2.6.9.4 Summary of Risks Associated with Site 16
Human health and ecological risk assessments were conducted for Site 16 using data collected
during the RI. Risk assessment methodologies are summarized in Section 2.4.1.4. Risk
assessment summaries for Site 16 are presented in this section.
2.6.9.4.1 Human Health Risk Characterization
The HHRA evaluated soil only. Groundwater at Site 16 is included in OU4. The pathways for
human exposure to surface water and sediment are not complete and, thus, were not evaluated.
Detected COPCs in soil include metals, SVOCs, and VOCs. Current/future workers and future
residents could be exposed to soil contaminants through incidental ingestion, dermal contact, and
inhalation of VOCs or particulates.
SCI/I.99AVPC/Pendleto/RODI2l99.wp
-------
The cumulative residential risk from maximum detected COPCs is 1.9x10'' and is primarily
attributable to arsenic (approximately JO percent of the total risk) and beryllium (approximately
90 percent of the total risk). The maximum concentration of arsenic (0.7 mg/kg) is below the
background value (4.25 mg/kg), whereas the maximum concentration of beryllium (2 4 mg/kg)
exceeds background (1.42 mg/kg). Excluding the portion of total risk attributable to background
metals, the incremental residential site risk is 7x10*. Assuming that beryllium is lognormally
distributed throughout the soil at Site 16, the estimated 95 percent UCL soil concentration for
beryllium is 1.2 mg/kg. Excluding the portion of total risk attributable to background, the
incremental residential site risk for the 95 percent UCL soil concentration is 2.0xlO'7.'
The cumulative residential noncarcinogenic hazard for the maximum detected COPCs is 0.64
and is primarily attributable to metals (approximately 99 percent of the total hazard). Excluding
the portion of total hazard attributable to background metals, the incremental residential site
hazard is O.I.
The incremental residential cancer risk is less than I* 10* and the incremental noncarcinogenic
hazard is less than 1.0. The maximum lead concentration (465 mg/kg) exceeds the residential
soil PRO. During two resampling events at the location where the maximum lead concentration
was detected, lead concentrations were 35 and 17 mg/kg. The other 18 detections of lead were
below residential PRGs. The single high concentration of lead is not uniformly distributed
throughout site soil, as indicated by the lower detections of lead in subsequent sampling at the
maximum concentration location and at other locations. Based on the conservative assumptions
used, no adverse health impacts are expected from lead at Site 16. Therefore, Site 16 soil is
considered protective of human health.
2.6.9.4.2 Ecological Risk Assessment
Seven preliminary COPECs (six inorganics and one organic) in soil had HQs exceeding 1.0
(Figure 2-23). HQs were calculated for representative species for multiple soil samples at seven
locations; the samples were analyzed for 119 inorganic and organic chemicals. Most of the HQs
that exceed 1.0 are less than 10, indicating that the potential for toxicity is relatively low. HQs
for beryllium, cadmium, chromium, lead, and zinc are in the medium toxicity range (10 to 100).
The frequencies of detection for chemicals with HQs greater than 1.0 were high (100 percent),
with the exception of cadmium (13 percent) and diesel (47 percent).
SCI/l-99/WPC/Pen
-------
H* for two preliminary sediment COPECs, barium and 4,4'-DDT, exceed I.O(FigUre2 ™
a a reference area /1.99/WPC/Pendlelo/RODI2199.vvpd 2-116
-------
80.5 mg/kg, was resampled and a concentration of 12.6 mg/kg was detected. This indicates that
the concentrations and extent of lead contamination at the site are not as high as indicated by the
initial sampling.
Other preliminary COPECs with HQs exceeding 1.0 include beryllium, cadmium, chromium,
copper, and zinc. HQs for these chemicals are in the low and medium toxicity ranges. Soil *
leachability testing demonstrated that leaching of these chemicals from soil into sediments and
surface water is insignificant. The actual areas of the site where contamination is present is
likely a limited proportion of the overall site area. These areas are generally smaller than the
home range sizes of representative bird and mammal species. Given the relative lack of suitable
habitat compared with surrounding areas, ecological receptors would not likely be sufficiently
exposed to preliminary COPECs at the site to result in adverse effects.
None of the preliminary COPECs in sediment were retained as final COPECs because the
potential for exposure and effects is considered low. Barium was not retained as a final COPEC
because concentrations were less than upstream reference concentrations and soil background
levels, indicating that barium concentrations in the ditches are reflective of background
conditions for the area. The pesticide 4,4'-DDT was not retained because HQs were low and it
was detected only once on site. This compound was not detected in aquatic invertebrate
(crayfish) tissues collected from the on-site drainage ditches or in crayfish samples collected
from a downstream location at Site 27.
None of the preliminary COPECs in surface water were retained as final COPECs because the
potential for exposure and effects is considered low. The HQs indicated low potential toxicity,
and barium and diesel were the only chemicals exceeding PLEs at more than one sample station
within the site. Barium and diesel were not retained as final COPECs because concentrations of
barium could be reflective of underlying sediment concentrations or ambient conditions for the
area and the HQs for diesel were generally in the low toxicity range (1 to 10). Diesel was
detected in only two surface-water samples. The source of the diesel contamination likely is
attributable to storm-water runoff from roadway areas at the different sites that contribute
drainage to the ditch. Potential sources that may have contributed to the diesel detections in the
stormwater runoff near Site 16 include the motor transportation/maintenance facility immediately
northeast of the site and the asphalt parking lot south of the site. Soil leachability studies
demonstrated that residual contamination in on-site soils is probably not a significant contributor
.SCI/l-99/Wrc/Pendleto/ROD!2l99.wpd 2-1 17
-------
to surface water at the site. Three preliminary COPECs exceeded PLEs based on A WQC (iron
copper and zmc). These constituents were not retained as final COPECs because they were '
Subst * ;™i0nS CXCeeding AWQC °°* °nce -" a< "ly « "-ion within the site.
^ ^ "*" AW concentrations
are n
are no cons.stently at potentially toxic level, !„ addition, the ditch is only seasonally wet and
as such, does not support higher tropic level aquatic organisms (e.g., fish).
2.6.9.5 Description of the No Action Alternative
The no action alternative selected for Site 16 soil, sediment, and surface water includes no
The human health HI for maximum detected soil concentrations is less than 1 .0.
2.6. f 0 S/fe 17- 22 Area Building 22187 Marsh and Ditch
Site 1 7 consists of a marsh and ditch near Building 22] 87 in 22 Area.
2. 6. 10. 1 Site Name, Location, and Description
, °f a" Unli"ed' de^ vegetated
ocated about 0-25 mi.e southeast of the MCAS and approximately 1 mile frl the Santa
Marganta Rlver (F.gure 1-2). Seasonal surface water flows in the un.ined ditch, which is
approximately 1 0 feet wide and 2 to 8 feet deep.
Site 17 is bordered on the west and northwest by light to moderate vegetation, on the east by
grass, and on the south by Building 22187. An elevated concrete walkway traverses the ditch
The sue „ suuated in a flat part of the floodp.ain, is drained by two northwest-flowing ditches
and rece-ves runoff from the Building 22187 are, T* confluence of several ditches widens and
nd rhTd at r site ' 6 is north ^ site 2? is downstream to the —
and ditch. R,dges to the east and south rise 350 feet above .he site (Figure 2-24).
SCl/l-99AVPC/Pcndleto/RQDI2!99.wpd 2-1 18
-------
No perennial surface water is present in the immediate vicinity of Site 17. The area receives only
low annual rainfall, primarily during winter months. Surface water at the site is generally
ephemeral and follows the gently sloping ground surface to the southwest. The Site 17 ditch
drains into Site 16 and Site 27 ditches, which eventually discharge southwest into the Santa
Margarita River. Any surface water that does not drain to the ditches either percolates into the
subsurface or evaporates.
Land use in the vicinity of Site 17 consists of activities associated with major warehousing and
food storage functions for the base. Structures in the area include maintenance shops, motor
pools, fueling facilities, administrative buildings, scrap yards, recreation areas, troop housing,
and industrial and warehouse buildings. Military and civilian personnel are present in the
immediate vicinity of the site on a daily basis. An elevated walkway crosses Site I7andSite 16
to the north. The nearest designated troop housing areas are in the Chappo (22) Area,
approximately 500 feet from the site. The nearest family housing, the Ranch House, is about
1.25 miles northeast of Site 17. The nearest base production well (10S/05W-13R02) is
approximately 1 mile northwest of Site 17.
Site 17 contains predominantly normative grassland habitat. Dominant grass species include
ripgut brome and wild oat. The two ditches that traverse the site contain remnant strips of
riparian habitat, including cottonwood, willow, and cattail. No special-status species were
observed during the site surveys. A least Bell's vireo was tentatively identified on the site but
could not be confirmed. During ecological surveys, 19 bird species were identified on site,
including song sparrow, red-winged blackbird, Anna's hummingbird, and red-shouldered hawk.
House mice and California ground squirrels were caught in live-traps during the March 1995
survey. No reptiles were observed. Aquatic and terrestrial invertebrates were observed at the
site during the March, June, and October 1995 surveys.
2.6.10.2 Site History and Enforcement Activities
Site 17 consists of a naturally occurring drainage ditch that could have received hazardous
materials. The ditch received runoff from the Building 22187 area. Building 22187 is a steam
generation plant that was built in 1952. POLs and corrosives (descalers) were used during
previous operations and are currently stored in the Building 22187 area. A diesel spill reportedly
flowed into the drainage ditch immediately north of Building 22187. In addition, thousands of
gallons of diesel from an overflowing UST reportedly spilled into the ditch in the late 1980s. In
SCI/I-99/WPOPend!eto/ROD!2l99.wpd 2-119
-------
An initial study of two
a flame-ionizarton dete«or (FID)
I WOO ppn, a, approxin,alely I5
on 0,es= sa.npte during thc initial
—tod to ,he
Ppm' * ""*»«'
" — ,r,,ions wre ,5,000
"
e Characteristics
D site (SWDIV .« r , samp'ing was conducted d""»s *•
,„ pe Jem ^^s I,; " tf 'hC W ^^ 'ta S°« —-nan-
addressed under «. base UST pro6r™ 1 d ""^ *"" CERCLA — ™" "»
oroundwattrats,,e ,d -—
c0llec,ed
P«.icide,
are shown igure 2-24
**"
P0.en,ial p^ence
was oondu«ed ,„
2.S.W.3.I
,o
SCI/|.99/WPC/Pcndlclo/RODI2199.wpd
2-120
-------
Jolia Group bedrock of Eocene age. Soil at this site consists of alluvial sand, silt, and clay
deposited as discontinuous lenses. The predominant lithology in the area is poorly graded to
well-graded sand, with discontinuous lenses of lower permeability silty sand, silt, and clay.
Poorly graded sand and less abundant lenses of low-permeability silty sand, clayey sand, silt, and
clay underlie the ditch confluence area.
The alluvium at Site 17 extends to depths of at least 84 feet. The La Jolla Group was
encountered at a depth of 71 feet below ground surface in one well close to the eastern hillslope.
suggesting a thickening of alluvium downstream. The La Jolla Group crops out on hillsides
surrounding 22 Area and consists of fine- to medium-grained sandstone interbedded with silty
sandstone, clayey sandstone, siltstone, and claystone. Boring logs and geologic cross-sections
for Site 17 are presented in the draft final RI report for Group C sites (SWDIV, 1996a).
Site 17 is located on the alluvial plain of the Santa Margarita Basin, on the south edge of the
Chappo subbasin. The regional groundwater flow direction is primarily southwest, parallel to the
long axis of the basin. Depth to the water table at Site 17 ranges from 5 to 10 feet below ground
surface. Local groundwater flows west-southwest, parallel to the long axis of the Chappo
subbasin and consistent with regional groundwater flow.
2.6.10.3.2 Surface-Water and Sediment Results
Because no pathways for human exposure exist for surface water or sediment, the contaminants
detected in these media are of concern only for ecological receptors. Accordingly, the results are
not compared against human health evaluation criteria. The analytical results are summarized in
Figure 2-24.
2.6.10.4 Summary of Risks Associated with Site 17
An EcoRA was conducted for Site 17 using data collected during the Group C and Group D RIs.
Risk assessment methodology is summarized in Section 2.4.1.4.
HQs for four preliminary sediment COPECs (barium, cadmium, 4,4'-DDE, and 4,4'-DDT)
exceed 1.0 (Figure 2-24). Three sediment samples were collected and analyzed for 119 inorganic
and organic chemicals. HQs for cadmium exceed 1.0 at one location (sample station 1). HQs for
barium exceed 1.0 at sample stations 1,2, and 3. HQs for 4,4'-DDE and 4,4'-DDT exceed 1.0 at
sample station 1. All HQs that exceed 1.0 are very close to 1.0, indicating that the potential for
SCI/]-99/WPOPendleto/ROD12J99.wpd 2-121
-------
the Santa Margarita Basin. cons,derab,y !ess majl soil background .eve.s for
HQs for two preliminary surface-r . •
exposure by aouatic o^anisms h^cTf ** *** — ''° f°' *«*
range (,0 to ,00, a, sample sta, on! , and 4 Sn f "" ™ '" "" ^^ 'mi^
«* an HQ in to high ^ Jg ^ ^ *«- only once, a, Samp,e station 1 .
AWQC. Both chemicais a,so exceed HA fa ^ " C°raPariS°n "* "« Chronic
are !ess than , 0, indicating tha, thelt^al fo 7 ^^ * aqUatiC "'^^ bul *" »
detection for the preliminary C^E~HOs ^'S T* ^ "•.««.— -*
^veratsamp.estation 1 (one *J^£J± , '? W "'»'*"»• i-*- and
Cation 4. The HQs for L«J^^~^ """ <"* « -* - "Uected a,
than 1 .0. representauve spec.es exposed to surface water are all less
water consist of aquatic organisms. ««ed,ng 1 .0 for sed,raent and surface
None of the preliminary sediment
constdered .ow. Barium was no, retained as a f,ncOPEC i * ' * "
the upstream reference concen and concentrations are less than
SCI/|.99/WPC/Pendlelo/ROD12l99.wpd 2-122
-------
None of the preliminary surface-water COPECs were retained as final COPECs. Silver exceeded
the AWQC in a duplicate sample but could not be verified through subsequent sampling because
the station was dry. In addition, silver was detected only once at the site and was not detected in
underlying sediment samples, suggesting a potential artifact of sampling. Barium was not
retained because the potential for exposure and effects is considered low and concentrations of
barium could reflect underlying sediment concentrations or ambient conditions for the area.
2.6.10.5 Description of the No Action Alternative
The no action alternative selected for Site 17 sediment and surface water includes no institutional
controls. Site 17 surface water and sediment are considered protective of human health and the
environment for the following reasons:
• There is no complete human exposure pathway.
Although a few chemicals pose a potential ecological risk, the overall potential risk is
low. The potential for exposure and adverse effects is considered low for surface
. water and sediment.
2.6.11 Site 18 -13/16 Area Building 1687 Spill and Ditch
Site 18 consists of ditches and spill areas near Building 1687 in 13/16 Area.
2.6.11.1 Site Name, Location, and Description
Site 18 - 13/16 Area Building 1687 Spill and Ditch, is located in the southern part of the
Headquarters Area, approximately 1,250 feet west of Vandegrift Boulevard (Figure 1-2). The
ditch is an ephemeral drainage that runs southward down a slight hill, away from two motor pool
areas, a large parking area, and an oil/water separator. The drainage ditch runs along "B" Street,
into a concrete-lined ditch approximately 200 feet north of the intersection of 6th and "B"
Streets. In the vicinity of Site 18, the concrete-lined ditch runs west to east, parallel to 6th Street.
The area receives only low annual rainfall, primarily during winter months. The concrete-lined
ditches drain east into Pilgrim Creek (approximately 1 mile to the east), flow southwest into
Windmill Lake, and eventually discharge into the San Luis Rey River.
No perennial surface water is present in the vicinity of Site 18. Any surface water that does not
drain to the ditch either percolates into the subsurface or evaporates. No drinking water wells are
located within a 1-mile radius of Site 18.
SCI/l-99AVPC/Pendteto/'RODI2l99.wpd 2-123
-------
Structures in the vicinity of Site 18 include maintenance shops, motor pools, fueling facilities
adm.n.stn.t.ve buildings, and troop housing. Military and civiHan perle are
.3/16 Area. The nearest farnihy homing, Serra Mesa Housing, is about 0.5 mile east of
Site u consists primarily of defined drainages, most of which are concrete-lined. However one
section ,s vegetated with freshwater emergent wettad species such as bulrush and caKai,
Young w,llows and cottonwoods a,so grow in this section of the ditch. No special-sate species
are expected Uo present on this site. Wildlife species observed during ,he rlnnaislr
survey .nclude cl.ff swallow. American crow, and California ground squirrel.
i.e.11.2 Site History and Enforcement Activities
Site 1 8 was added to the R!/FS after a visit by ft. Navy and Jacobs Engineering Group ,nc
' '
hb — «
housed battery shops, storage areas, and a bulk fuel area. POLs, so.vents, ami corrosives
represent typical waste types spilled at this site.
2.6.11.3 Summary of Site Characteristics
Site 18 was investigated in June and July ,996 during the HI for Group D sites. A total of 20 Soil
samptes were coHected from eight boring ,oca,io»s (Figure 2-25, The samples were llyzL
for m=*,s, VOC, and SVOCs. Poo, recovery precluded the collection of groundwater salves
No surface-water or sediment samp.es were coUected because no surface water was present on
SllC*
2.6.11.3.1 Geology and Hydrogeology
Surface geology at Site 1 8 consists primarily of alluvium of Holocene age overlying the La Jolla
Group bedrock of Eocene age. The predominant litho.ogy at the site is oorly J d Sand 1
d.sconnnuous lenses of lower permeability sihy sand, clayey sand, and silt. Bedrock was not
encountered in boring 1 8B-02; alluvium extends to a depth of at least 23 feet at this location
The La Jo la Group was encountered at depths of 9 and 13 feet in borings 18B-03and 18B-06
rcspectwely. These two borings are located near opposing south and north hillslope walls The
SCI/l-99/Wrc/PendIelo/RODI2l99.»pd 2-124
-------
La Jolla Group crops out on hillsides surrounding 13/16 Area and consists of fine- to medium-
grained sandstone interbedded with silty sandstone, clayey sandstone, siltstone, and claystone.
Based on site geology, groundwater is assumed to flow to the south, following surface
topography. Soil borings were drilled to a maximum depth of 40 feet below ground surface at
Site 18; perched groundwater was encountered at a depth of 9.2 feet in boring 18B-04. Field
observations indicated that the continuous water-bearing aquifer at Site 18 is more than 40 feet
below ground surface.
2.6,11.3.2 Soil Results
This section discusses analytical results from soil sampling at Site 18. Results are summarized in
Figure 2-25, which presents detected organics and any inorganics that exceed risk/hazard criteria.
Organics
No organics were detected in Site 18 soil at concentrations exceeding PRGs (Figure 2-25).
Acetone, benzoic acid, 2,4-dinitrotoluene, bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate, butylbenzylphthalate, and
di-n-octylphthalate were detected at low concentrations; the highest concentration detected was
0.52 mg/kg for bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate.
Inorganics
Arsenic was detected in 9 of 22 samples and beryllium was detected in 19 of 22 samples at
concentrations exceeding PRGs but below background (Figure 2-25),
Summary
No organics were detected in soil at concentrations exceeding PRGs; arsenic and beryllium were
the only inorganics that exceeded PRGs, but concentrations were below background. Despite
attempts to collect water samples, groundwater was not encountered at Site 18. Based on soil
concentrations and the deep water table, groundwater is not expected to be impacted. No
significant site-related contamination exists at Site 18.
2.6.11.4 Summary of Risks Associated with Site 18
Human health and ecological risk assessments were conducted for Site 18 using data collected
during the RI. Risk assessment methodologies are summarized in Section 2.4.1.4. Risk
assessment summaries are presented in this section.
SCI/I-99/WPC/Pendleto/ROD!2l99A>pd 2-125
-------
2.6.11.4.1 Human Health Risk Characterization
Detected COPCs in soil include metals VOCs and SVOr, r
residents could be exposed to soil cn t ^ Current/future workers and future
*""* *"*" ^™> *«- —
inhaiation of VOCs
The cumulative residential risk from maximum detected COPCs is 3
-s
,he < ' t
The cumulative residential HI from maximum detected COPCs in .nil • i < s- •
protective of human health.
SCI/I.99AVPC/Pcndlclo/RODI2I99.wpd 2-126
-------
2.6.11.4.2 Ecological Risk Assessment
HQs for seven preliminary COPECs exceed 1.0 (Figure 2-25) for one or two representative
species; HQs are less than 1.0 for the other species. HQs were calculated for representative
species for each of 11 soil samples, which were analyzed for II9 inorganic and organic
chemicals. Most of the HQs exceeding 1.0 are less than 10, indicating that the potential for
toxicity is relatively low. Aluminum, barium, and mercury had HQs in the medium toxicity
range (10 to 100). The highest HQs for barium (12) and for aluminum (12) were calculated for
the American robin. Aluminum and barium also had high frequencies of detection (100 percent).
The highest HQ calculated for mercury was 20 for the deer mouse, indicating potentially high
toxicity; however, mercury was detected in only 1 of 11 samples and most of the other HQs were
less than 1.0.
Site 18 consists primarily of concrete-lined ditches that have low habitat value for terrestrial
receptors. One section is unlined and characterized by emergent wetland species. No special-
status species are expected to be present on site. Representative species for this site with HQs
exceeding 1.0 include terrestrial invertebrates, deer mouse, and American robin.
None of the preliminary COPECs were retained as final COPECs because the potential for
exposure and effects is considered low. The HQs for most of the chemicals detected are less than
1.0, indicating little or no toxicity. Aluminum, barium, and mercury had HQs greater than 10,
but the frequency of detection for mercury was low and the remaining HQs are generally less
than 1.0. In addition, the site is mostly developed and the available habitat is very limited. The
home ranges of the representative mammal and bird species are generally larger than the
available site habitat in which contaminants were detected. Given the limited on-site habitat and
relatively good habitat surrounding the site, representative wildlife species would likely only be
present on site for limited periods of time. Therefore, exposure of wildlife receptors to the
preliminary COPECs at the site is not expected to result in any adverse effects.
2.6.11.5 Description of the No Action Alternative
The no action alternative selected for Site 18 soil and groundwater includes no institutional
controls. Site 18 soil and groundwater are considered protective of human health and the
environment for the following reasons:
• The incremental cancer risk for soil is less than 1 x 10'6.
SCI/l-99AVPC/Pendl«lo/RODl 2199. wpd 2-127
-------
• Excluding background, the HI for soi! fa less than 1 .0.
on the fte,Uency a, which risk COMribulors
2.6.12 Site 27- 22 Ana Ditches Behind Building 22*10
Site 27 consists of ditches behind Building 222IO in 22 Area.
2.6.T2.7 Site Name, Location, and Description
in the highiy vegeuted drainage ditches a
"""-*' "'
poois, Mng facilities,
and intoria, and ^Khouse buildings
in buiidings in ,ne vicinity of the .itches
areas a,e in the Chappo (22, Area, approximately
housing is the Ranch House, about , .5 mi,cs nonheast rf
well « approximately 4,200 feet northwest of Site 27.
Site 27 contains a 30-foo,-wide sWp of riparian
SCI/l-99/WPC/Pendlelo/RODI2l99.Wpd
2-128
<™P housing,
°" «*
P™ta,on
-------
along Avenue D. Southeast of the riparian strip is a small patch of coastal sage scrub.
Sagebrush, coyote brush, and deerweed are the dominant species in this habitat. During the
surveys, 24 bird species were identified. Common species include European starling, common
yellowthroat, and California towhee. A least Bell's vireo (a special-status species) was observed
m the riparian strip parallel to Avenue D. During the March survey, deer mice, western harvest
mice, and house mice were caught in live-traps. Audubon cottontails were observed throughout
the site. No amphibians were observed. A western diamondback rattlesnake was found in a rock
pile near the riparian strip. Aquatic and terrestrial invertebrates were observed at the site during
the March, June, and October 1995 surveys.
2.6.72.2 Site History and Enforcement Activities
Site 27 consists of naturally occurring drainage ditches that could have received hazardous
materials from various facilities in the 22 Area. Site 27 is downstream from the Site 16 and
Site 17 ditches, from storm-water discharge pipes entering the drainage from the 22 Area, and
from previously detected contamination. Facilities in the area Jnclude warehouses and industrial
operations. No information is available on the quantities of contaminants received by the
ditches.
Previous investigations at Site 27 were limited to a sampling visit (SV) conducted as part of the
RFA for S V Site 111. The S V analysis included six surface soil samples and four subsurface soil ,
samples from six hand-augered soil borings that were advanced in the 22 Area drainage ditches
to investigate potential contamination associated with runoff entering the ditches. The SV
borings were advanced during the summer when the ditches were dry. Groundwater was
encountered in all borings at depths of 2 to 6 feet below surface. No groundwater samples were
collected as part of the SV. Chlorinated solvents detected in two soil borings included 1.1-
dichloroethene (DCE), TCE, chlorobenzene, methylene chloride, and PCE (SWDIV, 1993a).
2.6.12.3 Summary of Site Characteristics
Site 27 was investigated with the Group C sites (SWDIV, I996a). Additional ecological
sampling was conducted during the RI for Group D Sites (SWDIV, 1997b). Site 27 groundwater
is part of OU4. Eight surface-water and eight sediment samples were collected from the Site 27
ditches (Figure 2-26) and were analyzed for metals, VOCs, SVOCs, TPH as diesel and gasoline,
and pesticides and PCBs. The surface-water samples were also analyzed for general chemistry.'
No soil samples were collected because the ditches were saturated.
SCI/l-99AVPC/Pendleio/RODI2!99.»pd 2-129
-------
.Dunng March I995, aaiut suryey ^ conducted ^
hahtats were ,den,,r,ed. Bird and genera! wildlife surveys were conducted to evahL te
po,en,,al presence of speciaNstatus wildlife species. Mamma! trapping (using Sherman live-
traps) was conducted to identify small mammal use of the site. ««™nl,ve
One aquatic invertebrate (crayfish) sample and one terrestrial invertebrate (mixed ic
were coilected in June , W5 and two aquatic invertebrate (crayfish) samp,« (one sp l
o ga^hlorme pes,,c,de concentrations (27SDOO, and 27SD002) (Figure 2-26). ,„ October
1995. terres,™, mvertebrates (sowbugs and grasshoppers) were collected from the seasonally
flooded playground areaa,ong ,0,h Street, southeast of Phase , RI sampHng ,oca,ion27SDOO,
2.6.12.3.1 Geology and Hydrogaology
The geology of Site 27 consists primarily of stream^eposited alluvium of Holocene age
over ymg the La Jolla Group bedrock of Eocer. age. The alluvium is predomta y * , and
poorly graded sand containing varying amounts of silt and interbedded day len^ rn
fcckness of the a.luvium a, Site 27 was no, ful.y penetrated during driUing" ho've™ ,uvi»m
near well cluster 6W-06, approximately 2,000 fee, southwest of 27-
„ H , •'TV"" °° Hi"SideS SUrroundi°8 22 *« and consists of flne- to medium-grained"
sandstone mterbedded wi,h silty sandstone, clayey sandstone, silts.one, and claystone
^Sl£^£^^S BaSi"'P" 'he "« "* °f ""
long axis of the basin. Depth to the water table at Site 27 ranges from 5 to 10 f bel
surface. Local groundwater flow is west-southwest naralM t« *h i • J* °W gr°Und
•w T«*«*»* «-»vutn.wcal, DdlolJlCI IO tflC Ion? 3X1^ rtf^fh«a /^*K
subbasin and consistent with regional groundwater flow. SPP°
2.6.12.3.2 Surface-Water and Sediment Results
A summary of analytical results is presented in Figure 2-26. Because no pathways for human
~~ surface water or sediment, the contaminants detected in these Ldia JeoT
concern only for ecological receptors. Accordingly, the results are not compared against human
health evaluation criteria, but rather against ecological risk criteria.
SCI/l-99/WPC/Pcndleto/RODI2l99.wpd 2-130
-------
2.6.12.3.3 Biota Results
Biota collected from the site included terrestrial and aquatic invertebrates. The maximum
detected tissue concentrations were compared with similar biota collected from reference areas
T,ssue concentrations in terrestrial invertebrates exceeded reference values at sample station I
(seven inorganics), sample station 3 (seven inorganics), and sample station 4 (two inorganics)
The reference quotients are all less than 10 and most are very close to 1.0, indicating that tissue
levels are very similar to those found in unaffected areas. Organochlorine pesticides were not .
detected in terrestrial invertebrates.
Tissue concentrations in aquatic invertebrates (crayfish) were compared with reference values
from two different reference areas (R8 and R4) and with PLEs for ingestion by raccoons The
following preliminary COPECs exceeded values for both reference areas: aluminum, barium
chromium, cobalt, copper, iron, manganese, nickel, silver, zinc, and 4,4'-DDE. Vanadium
exceeded only R8 reference values. All reference HQs are less than 10, indicating that tissue
levels are relatively close to those at unimpacted reference areas.
Crayfish tissue concentrations were also compared with PLEs for ingestion by raccoons. This
comparison indicated that crayfish tissue concentrations could be reflective of local ambient
conditions because PLEs were exceeded by the same chemicals in tissues collected on site and
from the R4 reference area.
2.6.12.4 Summary of Risks Associated with Site 27
Human health and ecological risk assessments were conducted for Site 27 using data collected
during the Group C and Group D RIs. Risk assessment methodologies are summarized in
Section 2.4.1.4. Risk assessment summaries for Site 27 are presented in this section.
2.6.12.4.1 Human Health Risk Characterization
The exposure pathways for surface water and sediment are incomplete for human receptors.
Humans are not present at the site frequently enough to support a chronic exposure. Therefore,
site surface water and sediment are considered protective of human health.
2.6.12.4.2 Ecological Risk Assessment
HQs for 12 preliminary sediment COPECs (8 inorganics and 4 organics) exceed l.O (Figure 2-
26) but are generally less than 10, indicating a low potential for toxicity, with the following
SCI/l-99/WPC/Pemi!elo/RODI2]99wpd 2-131
-------
4.4--DDE a, samp,e sMons , and 2, 4,4'.DDT a, sampie stations , and 4 and
" 'i0nS 5 ^ 6' BariUm' 4'4'-°DE' -" 44'-D
a, severa! of ft. stations along men,ain portion of lhe di,ch. bonly
«wo samp.es were coHected a, each Satnp,e station. Concentrations of ban™, cadmit
H d cou,d
«d f 8 COndWO"S- '" addm°n- badUm «— «-*» - less U^ U,ose
detected a, a referee area upstream from Site 27. Concentrations of the remaining indies
copper. ,ron, Iead. and z,nc) exceed soil background levels but resulted in HQs cloL to 10
(ranging from 1 .1 to 2.5).
HQs for 1 1 preliminary surface-water COPECs (8 inorganics and 3 organics) exceed 1.0 for
chrome exposure by aquatic organisms (Figure 2-26). HQs are generally less than 10 The
excepttons are barium a, sampie stations 1 , 2, 6, 7, 8, and 9; mercury a, sample station , ; and
stiver at sample sta,,on 7. The HQs for preliminary COPECs a, these sample stations ar in the
med-urn toxtc.ty range (10 to ,00). Preliminary COPECs exceeding chronic AWQC include
aluminum, chlonde, cyanide, iron, mercury, and silver. Aluminum, cyanide, mercury and siiver
were detected on,y once (ou, of three or four samp.es). Ch,oride and iron were ,e KL°
mPECs ,hT KUlar7Pl"'ati0'"b'«-^AWQCva1ueson,yonce. PreUminary
COPBCs w«h HQs exceedmg 1 .0 for acute exposure by aquatic organisms include barium
cyantde, and stiver, but al, HQs are less man 1 0, indicating a low potentia! for toxicity The
requenctes of detection for the preliminary COPECs with HQs exceeding ,.0 ranged from 30 to
00 percent (w,,h,» each sample station). The HQs for terrestrial representative species exposed
to surface water are all less than 1.0.
None of the preliminary sediment COPECs were retained as fina, COPECs because the potential
for exposure and effects is considered low. The HQs for most of the preliminary COPECs „
close to 1.0; only a few HQs exceed 10. Inorganics were not retained because concentrations
less than or close to background soil levels and could reflect background conditions for the area
Organochlorme pesticides were not retained because most of the associated HQs are less than 10
mdietfng low potential toxicity. Fn addition, the crayfish collected from Site 27, as well as those
from upstream (Site 16 and R8 [reference area]), showed very little bioaccumulation of 4 4'-DDT
or its metabolites in the aquatic food web.
are
are
area.
SCI/|.99/WPC/Pend!cto/RODI2l99.wpd 2-132
-------
None of the preliminary surface-water COPECs were retained as final COPECs because the
potential for exposure and effects is considered low. The HQs indicated low potential toxicity
for most preliminary COPECs based on chronic comparisons and for all preliminary COPECs
based on acute comparisons. Preliminary COPECs exceeding PLEs based on AWQC values
were not retained as final COPECs because the chemicals were either detected only once or
exceeded AWQC values only once, indicating that they are not present at high concentrations on
a consistent basis. In addition, the ditches are only seasonally wet and chemicals exceeding
acute AWQC were detected only once. Other preliminary COPECs exceeding acute PLEs had
HQs very close to 1.0, indicating low potential toxicity.
2.6.12.5 Description of the No Action Alternative
The no action alternative selected for Site 27 surface water and sediment includes no institutional
controls. Site 27 surface water and sediment are considered protective of human health and the
environment for the following reasons:
There is no complete exposure pathway for human receptors.
Although a few chemicals in surface water and sediments pose a potential ecological
risk, the overall potential risk is low based on the low potential for bioaccumulation
the frequency at which risk contributors were detected, and the background
contribution to risk.
2.6.13 Site 32 • Drum Storage Area and Drainage Between Buildings 41303 and
41366
Site 32 consists of a drum storage area and drainage in 41 Area.
2.6.13.1 Site Name, Location, and Description
Site 32 - Drum Storage Area and Drainage Between Buildings 41303 and 41366, is located
within the Las Flores Area, approximately 1,000 feet northeast of Stuart Mesa Road and
immediately east of its intersection with El Camino Real (Figure 1 -2). The site consists of an
inactive waste oil UST, lube rack, wash rack, oil/water separator, hazardous waste drum storage
area,-and partially lined drainage ditch. The ditch is approximately 1,500 feet long and runs
along the northern side of, and parallel to, El Camino Real. The wash rack, lube rack, oil/water
separator, and drum storage area are immediately adjacent to the drainage at various points along
the ditch. In addition, some petroleum-stained soil was observed approximately 200 feet
SCl/l-99/WPC/Pendleio/ROD 12199. wpd 2-133
-------
northeast of the =as,cm end of the ditch. The flow direction of the ditch is
northwest. Puigas Creek is approve* 0.75 rai,e northwest of Site »
is characterized by rolling hills surrounding area
mourning dove.
No perennial surface water is present in the immediate vicinity of Site 3? Th
^^
Site History and Enforcement Activities
SCI/I -99/WPC/PcndIclo/ROD 12199.wpd 2-134
-------
2.6.13.3 Summary of Site Characteristics
Prior to 1995, no sampling had been conducted at this site; however, in late 1995, Bechtel
collected a surface soil sample and a groundwater sample from the locations shown in Figure 2-
27. The purpose of this sampling effort was to support SWDIV in estimating and prioritizing
funding needs for future environmental restoration work. The samples were analyzed for VOCs,
SVOCs, and metals. The groundwater sample was not filtered but was preserved with acid; as a
result, the analytical results for metals were not usable. No other analytes were detected at
concentrations exceeding MCLs or PRGs.
Site 32 was investigated during the RI for Group D Sites (SWDIV, 1997b). A total of 40 soil
samples were collected from eight boring locations and one surface location, including the
Bechtel 1995 samples. The samples were analyzed for metals, VOCs, and SVOCs: A
groundwater sample was collected using a direct-push method during the 1995 sampling event.
Groundwater samples could not be collected from permanent wells during the 1996 RI because
sufficient water was not encountered to a depth of approximately 50 feet below ground surface,
No surface water was present on site.
A habitat and receptor survey was conducted at Site 32 during June 1996. Dominant vegetation
types and corresponding wildlife habitats were identified. Wildlife observed and evidence of
wildlife use (i.e., scat or tracks) were also noted.
2,6.13.3.1 Geology and Hydrogeology
Geology at this site is primarily marine terrace deposits. These materials consist predominantly
of interbedded fine-grained sand, silty and clayey sand, and clay and gravel lenses and were
probably deposited in near-shore marine and/or estuarine conditions during periods of fluctuating
sea levels.
Based on site geology, groundwater is assumed to flow to the southwest, following surface
topography. During the 1995 investigation, Bechtel collected a hydropunch sample at 47 feet
below ground surface. During the RI, soil borings were drilled to a maximum depth of 50 feet
below ground surface at Site 32; groundwater was encountered at a depth of 37.5 feet in boring
32B-01. However, data from the boring indicate that shallow groundwater is present only within
small, localized, discontinuous perched zones and a distinct continuous water-bearing zone
(aquifer) does not exist above 50 feet below grade at this site.
SCI/I -99/WPC/Pcndlcto/ROD 12199.wp<] 2-135
-------
2.6.13.3.2 Soil Results
chromium VI. which was detected , *«n>und value was available for
1.2mg/kg. -I. The maxunum concentration was
2.S.13.3.3 Groundwater Results
No organics were detected at concentrations exceedin. Mrr
groundwater sample from Site 32 (hydropl^, wCpT 'aP"Wa'er "^ '" "»
of 47 feet below ground surface) The onlv 7 approbate groundwater level
a. a concenter, of 1 .3 Mg/, ^^ ^'C """"'^ de'ecttd * «*«-Wi*«— .
2.6.13.3.4 Summary
No organics were detected in soil at concentrations exceeding PRGs Of* •
arsenic and beryllium concentrations w 'norganics detected,
SCJ/!.99/WPC/Pend|eto/RODI2I9g w
-------
1996 investigation, groundwater was not encountered to a depth of 50 feet. Based on the 1995
hydropunch sample (104CP61), none of the contaminant data exceed evaluation criteria Based
on the soil concentrations and the deep water table, groundwater contamination is not of concern.
2.6.13.4 Summary of Risks Associated with Site 32
Human health and ecological risk assessments were conducted for Site 32 using data collected
during the Group D RI. Risk assessment methodologies are summarized in Section 2.4.1.4. Risk
assessment summaries for Site 32 are presented in this section.
2.6.13.4.1 Human Health Risk Characterization
Soil COPCs include metals, VOCs, and SVOCs. Current/future workers and future residents
could be exposed to soil contaminants through incidental ingestion of soil, dermal contact with
soil, and inhalation of VOCs or soil particulates.
The-cumulative residential-risktrom themaximum detected COPCs is 1.4x1 (K The primary
risk drivers are arsenic (approximately 54 percent of the total risk) and beryllium (approximately
26 percent of the total risk). The maximum concentration of beryllium is less than the
background concentration for the basin, and the maximum arsenic concentration is only slightly
higher than the background concentration. Excluding the portion of total risk attributable to
background metals, the incremental residential site risk from maximum detected COPCs is
2.7x10-*. Assuming that metals are distributed lognormally throughout the soil, the 95 percent
UCL for arsenic, 2.7 mg/kg, is less than the background value. Excluding the portion of total
risk attributable to background metals, the incremental residential risk from the more
representative soil concentrations (e.g., 95 percent UCLs) is less than IxlO'6.
The cumulative residential HI from the maximum detected COPCs is 1.4 and is primarily
attributable to aluminum (approximately 25 percent of the total hazard), arsenic (approximately
12 percent of the total hazard), manganese (approximately 30 percent of the total hazard), and
vanadium (approximately 11 percent of the total hazard). Excluding the portion of total hazard
attributable to background, the incremental residential site hazard is 0.2, which is below the
threshold criterion of 1.0.
The results of the HHRA for Site 32 indicate that the incremental residential cancer risk is below
the lower end of the risk management range and the incremental residential noncarcinogenic
SCI/l-99/WPC/Pendlelo/ROD12l99.wpd 2-137
-------
hazard is below the threshold criterion of 1.0. In addition, the maximum lead concentration
(10.7 rng/kg) is below the screening criteria. Therefore, Site 32 soil is considered protective of
human health.
Groundwater is not considered a complete exposure pathway for either current/future workers or
future residents. However, a hydropunch sample was collected in 1995 as part of another study
No organic compounds were detected at concentrations exceeding PRGs, and the inorganic
sample results were rejected. Groundwater sampling was not performed at Site 32 during the
1996 investigation because drilling refusal occurred in weathered bedrock at less than 50 feet
below ground surface, before encountering sufficient groundwater for sampling purposes, Site
32 is not located above a shallow aquifer associated with any of the four major groundwater
basins at MCB Camp Pendleton (i.e., San Mateo, San Onofre, Las Flores, or Santa Margarita
•Basin). The site is topographically higher than, and isolated from, the aquifers associated with
these major basins.
Based on the results of the groundwater sample collected in 1995, the depth to groundwater the
lack of soil contamination, and the incomplete exposure pathway from groundwater to humans.
Site 32 groundwater is considered protective of human health.
2.6.13.4.2 Ecological Risk Assessment
The HQs for six preliminary COPECs (aluminum, arsenic, chromium, iron, nickel and
vanadium) exceed 1.0 (Figure 2-27). HQs were calculated for representative species for each of
17 soil samples, which were analyzed for 119 inorganic and organic chemicals. Most of the HQs
that exceed 1.0 are less than 10, indicating that the potential for toxtcity is relatively low. The
HQs for aluminum and chromium are in the medium toxicity range (10 to 100). All preliminary
COPECs with HQs exceeding 1.0 also had high frequencies of detection (100 percent in 17
samples).
Representative species for this site with HQs exceeding 1.0 include plants, terrestrial
invertebrates, deer mouse, raccoon, and least Bell's vireo.
None of the preliminary COPECs were retained as final COPECs because the potential for
exposure and effects is considered low. The HQs for most of the chemicals detected are less than
10. indicating low potential toxicity, with the exception of aluminum and chromium for
SCI/1 -99/WPC/Pendlcto/ROD 12199. wpd 2-138
-------
raccoons. The maximum detected concentrations of all preliminary COPECs with HQs
exceeding 1,0 are close to background levels, and concentrations for most of the remaining
samples are close to or less than background levels. In addition, the habitat at the site is
primarily mowed, and only a small portion east of the site could provide adequate habitat for
special-status species. The limited available habitat at the site is generally smaller than the home
ranges for the representative bird and mammal species. Given the developed nature of the site
representative wildlife species are not expected to be on site for significant periods of time.
Therefore, exposure of these receptors is probably minimal and is not likely to result in adverse
effects.
2.6.13.5 Description of the No Action Alternative
The no action alternative selected for Site 32 soil and groundwater includes no institutional
controls. Site 32 soil and groundwater are considered protective of human health and the
environment for the following reasons:
• There is no complete pathway for exposure of human receptors to groundwater.
The incremental cancer risk under the residential scenario using representative
concentrations is less than IxlO"6.
The incremental HI under the residential exposure scenario using maximum
concentrations 1S less than 1.0 and the maximum lead concentration is less than the
screening criteria.
• Although a few chemicals pose a potential ecological risk, the overall potential risk is
low The potential for exposure and adverse effects is considered low for soil based
on frequency at which risk contributors were detected, the background contribution to
risk, and the low potential for exposure in the developed site area.
2.6.14 Site 34 - Combat Engineers Maintenance Facility, Buildings 62580-62583
Site 34 is a maintenance facility near Buildings 62580-62583.
2.6.14.1 Site Name, Location, and Description
Site 34 - Combat Engineers Maintenance Facility, Buildings 62580-62583, is located in 62 Area,
approximately 0.5 mile southeast of the intersection of San Mateo and Cristianitos Roads
(Figure 1-2). The facility consists of a lube rack, several wash racks, a large maintenance and
motor transport area, a former hazardous waste storage area, and an adjacent drainage. The wash
SCI/l-99/WPC/Pendleio/RODI2l99 wptl 2-139
-------
rack lube rack, and maintenance and motor transport areas are located south of Building 62580
and the former hazardous waste storage area is located to the north. Two storm-water drains '
adjacent to the wash racks and lube rack discharge storm water toward the drainage ditch that
Hows east to west at the southern end of Site 34. The site is bordered on the west by Sewage
Treatment Plant No. 12, on the south by an unpaved access road and San Mateo Creek and on
the north and east by 62 Area buildings. Site 34 is 1,200 feet due south of Site II. Cristianitos
Creek is west of the site.
No perennial surface water is present in the vicinity of Site 34. Surface water at this site is
ephemeral and follows the gently sloping topography to the south. The area receives only low
annual rainfall, primarily during winter months, and surface flow is generally intermittent
Dunng significant rainfall events, surface water percolates into the subsurface, evaporates' or
runs off the site and discharges into San Ma.eo Creek, which eventually discharges into the
Pacific Ocean approximately 3 miles downstream from the site.
A large portion of Site 34 has been disturbed. Remnant vegetation types include coastal sage
scrub, normative grassland, and freshwater emergent wetland. Plant species in the coastal sage
scrub include sage and coyote bush. Wild oat is the dominant grass species in the normative
grassland habitat. Bulrush is the dominant plant species in the freshwater emergent wetland
habitat No special-status species are expected to be present on this site. Black phoebes and
western kingbirds were observed during the reconnaissance survey. The nearest base production
well 1s approximately 1 mile southwest of Site 34.
The Combat Engineers Maintenance Facility is currently active and is expected to remain so
Military and civilian personnel use the site frequently. The San Mateo (62) Area, where Site 34
is located, is used for personnel training, recreation, troop housing, vehicle maintenance, mess
and administration. An undeveloped area north of the site across San Mateo Road is classified as
a maneuver area and is covered by natural vegetation. The nearest designated troop housing is in
the San Mateo (62) Area, approximately 800 feet from the site. No family housing is located
within several miles of the site and none is planned.
2.6. 1 4.2 Site History and Enfnrr*wnt Activitio
Site 34 has been operated as a large maintenance facility for approximately 28 years and has a
history of spills. Wastes include waste oil, used vehicle fluids, and solvents. This facility was
SCI/l-99/WPC/Pend!elo/RODl2I99.wpd 2-140
-------
recommended for RJ durine the PR fPR Q;^ *>tc\ i L
the RFA. * ' ' "° Sampli"8 was '""ducted during
2.6.14.3 Summary of Site Characteristics
34Bo8,d K - ""US
34B 08, were dnMed ,n ,he vicinity of ^ wash racks ^ ^ «
S^.e 34 and ,he nearby tabe rack and mai»teMncc area. ra. san,pli»g was Iducted dlT
March tough May ,993 ,o suppor, ^^ ^^^ „ ste 34g ^ <™*
™ "° A °f ^ *"
sVOC S
vucs, and SVOCs. Sample locations are shown in Figure 2-28.
2.S.M.3.J Geology ana Hydrogeolagy
Shallow geology a, ,his she consists of a cobble zone overlain by alluvial silty sands clayey
surfce in boring 34B-'
are not available to confirm this assumption.
2. 6. 14.3.2 Soil Results
resuits from •*
2-28, wh,ch presents ducted organics and any inorganics to, exceed risk/ha^ criteria.
No organic compounds were deleted a, concentrations exceeding PROs in Site 34 soi,
ngure 2-28 . However, diesel was dented in tee 2-foo, sample from boring 34B-03 and the
±e,7P ^f8 MB'°4 a conce"'raltons of 29°
concentrations exceed the 1 00-mg/kg screening level.
The following 14 organics were detected in Site 34 soil a, concentrations below evaluation
cntena: ace.one, 2-butanone, methylene chloride, carbon disulflde, toluene 1 1 1-TCA
-
, fluorene, diethylphthalate
s, di-n-butylphthalate, and total volatile hydrocarbons (TVH). The highest'
concentration was 0.18 mg/kg for bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate.
Sa/l-99AVPC/PendIe[o/RODI2199.wpd 2-141
-------
Inorganics
•roximate
Arsenic and beryllium concentrations consistently exceeded PRGs (Figure 2-28) However
berylhum concentrations were below background (1.42 mg/kg), and arsenic concentrations were
generally not significantly higher than background (4.25 mg/kg). The maximum concentration
for arsenic was 8 mg/kg.
2.6.14.3.3 Groundwater Results
No organic compounds were detected in Site 34 groundwater (Figure 2-28).
Manganese (2,050 ug/l) and arsenic (8.4 ug/i) concentrations in well 34 GWT-01 (app™im
groundwater level of 11 feet below ground surface) exceeded tap-water PRGs (Figure 2-28)
Chromium VI (4 ug/l), arsenic (11.8 ug/l), and beryllium (0.04 ug/1) also exceeded tap-water
PRGs m the sample from well 34MW-01 (approximate groundwater level of 13 feet below
ground surface). However, the result for chromium VI was higher than for total chromium
(1.9 ug/l) and was rejected during data validation. No other inorganics were detected at
concentrations exceeding evaluation criteria.
As discussed for Site 1 A, the elevated manganese result is likely due to relatively poor filtration
of silts and small suspended particles in undeveloped hydropunch and temporary well samples
In contrast, the sandpack and well development activities for permanent wells are much more '
efficient m keeping the smallest suspended particles outside the well screen. Nondissolved
particles of manganese could pass through the 0.45-micron filter used in the field, which would
result m higher manganese concentrations for samples with higher TSS (i.e., temporary well
samples; see Section 4.1.1.2). The groundwater data from temporary well 34G WT-01 and
nearby permanent well 34MW-01 clearly depict this variation (Figure 2-28). Manganese was
detected at 2,050 ug/l in 34GWT-01 but was not detected in the permanent monitoring well
Furthermore, the detected concentration from 34GWT-01 is not significantly higher than the tap-
water PRO for manganese.
2.6.14.3.4 Summary
No organics were detected in soil at concentrations exceeding PRGs. Although diesel was
detected in soil at potentially leachable concentrations (greater than 100 mg/kg), no volatile or
sem.volat.le organic compounds were detected in the soil above PRGs indicating that the toxic
constituents of diesel are not a concern. Arsenic and beryllium were the only inorganics detected
SCI/|.99/WPOPendleto/RODl2l99.wpd 2-I42
-------
above PRGs, but concentrations were either below or only slightly above background.
Therefore, significant site-specific soil contamination does not exist at Site 34. No volatile or
semivolatile organic compounds were detected in groundwater. Therefore, the diesel
concentrations detected in soil are not considered a threat to groundwater or human health.
Accordingly, Site 34 groundwater does not appear to be impacted.
2.6.14.4 Summary of Risks Associated with Site 34
Human health and ecological risk assessments were conducted for Site 34 using data collected
during the RI. Risk assessment methodologies are summarized in Section 2.4.1.4. Risk
assessment summaries for Site 34 are presented in this section.
2.6.14.4.1 Human Health Risk Characterization
Soil COPCs include metals, VOCs, and SVOCs (PAHs). Current/future workers and future
residents could be exposed to soil contaminants through incidental ingestion, dermal contact,
inhalation of VOCs, and inhalation of particulates.
The cumulative residential risk from maximum detected soil COPCs is 2.7xlO'5. The primary
risk drivers are arsenic (approximately 78 percent of the total risk) and beryllium (approximately
21 percent of the total risk). Site-specific background was not available; therefore, Santa
Margarita Basin background levels were used as surrogate values. Arsenic exceeds and
beryllium is less than the respective surrogate background concentrations. Neither metal is
related to the waste streams associated with the maintenance facility. Excluding the portion of
total risk attributable to background metals, the incremental residential site risk from maximum
detected COPCs is IxlO'5. Assuming that metals are distributed lognormally throughout the soil,
the 95 percent UCL soil concentration of arsenic is 4.4 mg/kg, which is essentially the same as' '
the background concentration (4.25 mg/kg). Excluding the portion of total risk attributable to
background metals, the incremental residential risk from the more representative soil
concentrations is less than 1 x IO"6.
The cumulative residential hazard from the maximum detected COPCs is 1.4 and is primarily
attributable to metals. Excluding the portion of total hazard attributable to background metals,
the incremental residential site hazard from the maximum detected COPCs is less than 1.0.
SCI/1 -99/WPC/Pendlelo/ROD 12199.wpJ 2-143
-------
The results of the Site 34 HHRA indicate that the incremental residential cancer risk is below the
lower end of the risk management range and the incremental residential noncarcinogenic hazard
.s below the threshold criterion of 1.0. In addition, the maximum lead concentration
(29.5 mg/kg) is below the screening criteria. Based on the results of the HHRA, soil at Site 34 is
considered protective of human health.
Future residents could be exposed to groundwater contaminants through ingestion The
cumulative residential cancer risk from ingestion of groundwater is 2.6x10- and is completely
attnbutable to arsenic and beryllium. However, the maximum concentrations of arsenic
(11.8 ug/1) and beryllium (0.04 ug/1) are below the respective MCLs of 50 and 4 ug/1
respectively. Furthermore, because arsenic and beryllium in soil are within background
concentrations, groundwater concentrations of arsenic and beryllium are also likely due, at least
in part, to background concentrations.
The total noncarcinogenic hazard associated with ingestion of groundwater is 3.4 and is primarily
attnbutable to manganese (1.2) and arsenic (1.1). The His for individual target organs exceed 1 0
for the central nervous system and skin due to manganese (1.2) and arsenic (1.1). Arsenic and
manganese are within background concentrations for soil and are also likely within naturally
occumng background concentrations for groundwater. Some uncertainty is associated with the
RfD used to calculate the PRO for manganese and could result in an overestimate of the
hazard. Manganese was not detected in the permanent monitoring well located within 200 feet of
the temporary well in which the manganese concentration of concern was detected Some
uncertainty is associated with the results from the temporary well even though samples from both
wells were filtered in the field. Groundwater samples from temporary wells usually contain
h,gher TSS (the samples are muddy) due to the disturbance associated with the sampling method
Permanently installed wells are developed prior to sampling; as a result, samples typically have
much lower TSS prior to filtering than temporary well samples. Because temporary well
samples contain more particles, nondissolved particles could pass through the filter. Some
manganese particles could be small enough to pass through the 0.45-micron filter used in the
field (Hem. 1985) and could result in a higher concentration of manganese in the temporary well
sample. Many of the other detected metals are also naturally occurring and may be within
background.
SCt/|.'J9AVPCYPendlelo/RODI2l99.»pd 2-144
-------
reasons:
Groundwater at Site 34 is considered protective of human health for the following
" ^er!Cu!ated incremental residential cancer risk is 2.6x10^ and is completely
attributable to arsenic and beryllium. "jmprereiy
• Detected concentrations of arsenic and beryllium are less than the respective MCLs.
• Residential His due to manganese and arsenic exceed the 1 .0 criterion only slightly
*
• At least some portions of the metals of concern (arsenic, beryllium, and manganese)
are assumed to be within background. manganese)
2.6.14.4.2 Ecological Risk Assessment
HQs for nine preliminary COPECs (all inorganics) exceed 1 .0 (Figure 2-29) HQs were
calculated for representative species for all 29 soil samples, which were analyzed for 1 19
inorganic and organic chemicals. Most of the HQs are less than 10, indicating that the potential
for toxic,ty ,s relatively low. HQs for aluminum, boron, and chromium are in the medium
tox,c,ty range (10 to 100). The frequencies of detection for preliminary COPECs with HQs
exceedmg 1 .0 ranged from 20 to 100 percent. Both aluminum and chromium were detected in all
samples collected, but concentrations exceeded background in only one sample for aluminum
and two samples for chromium. Representative species for this site with HQs exceeding 1 0
include plants, terrestrial invertebrates, deer mouse, raccoon, California gnatcatcher, and
Savannah sparrow.
None of the preliminary COPECs were retained as final COPECs because the potential for
exposure and effects is considered low. Maximum detected concentrations are close to
background levels, and concentrations in the remaining samples are similar to or less than
background. Aluminum and chromium, which had potential toxicity in the medium range
exceeded background levels in only 1 or 2 of the 29 samples analyzed. In addition, most of the
sue is disturbed and has limited habitat. Because the habitat conditions of the surrounding areas
are of higher quality, wildlife receptors are not likely to spend much time on the site The
potentially contaminated areas of the site are generally smaller than the home range sizes of the
representative species. For these reasons, wildlife receptors are not expected to be exposed to the
preliminary COPECs at the site long enough to result in adverse effects.
SCI/l-99/WPCVPendlelo/ROD121 W.wpd 2- 1 45
-------
2.6. 14.5 Description of the No Action Alternative
for site 34 son
controls. Sue 34 so.i and groundwater are considered protective of human health and the
environment for the following reasons:
2.5.75 S/te35
Site 35 conszsts of a former sewage treatment plant facility in 25 Area.
2.6.15.1 Site Name, Location, and Description
* iong
beds, eaeh approximately ,00 fee, rong and 60 fee, wide. These
probably used ,„ conjunct wi,h ft. .reatmen, facility. Three of fa four
drymg beds showed a,,ay „ si,, ,ay=r abou, ,0 fee, be,6w ground sur&ce.
we
ce. ~ •
s,,e may have been Uned. Bo,h ,he facili-y and drying beds are on a ,evel surface Zt M< is
pamaUy fenced, and ,he drying beds are con,p,e,e,y surounded by fencing. *
The only perennial surface wa,er in UK vicini^ of She 35 is ,he Sana Margarto River The
inTr: : ri°f "* river is approximateiy 6°° *• - ^ -*•**- •»°^™<
» 4. drymg bed, fhe area recedes only ,ow annual rainfall, primarily during winter raon,ns.
SCI/l.99AVPC/Pcndleto/RODI2I99.wpd 2-146
-------
Excess surface water from significant rainfall events percolates into the subsurface, evaporates
or runs off the site and discharges into the Santa Margarita River.
The Santa Margarita River is a perennial braided stream that flows southwesterly. At the
Basilone Road bridge in the immediate vicinity of Site 35, the banks of the river are 10 to 15 feet
h.gh and are artificially maintained by loose riprap. The bridge is approximately 25 feet above
the stream bottom and typically does not restrict surface flow in the channel, even during winter
months. The banks of the Santa Margarita River are not artificially maintained upstream or
downstream of Site 35.
The 25 Area former sewage treatment plant facility is no longer in operation. Military and
civilian personnel are on site only occasionally. The Vado Del Rio (25) Area is used for
personnel training, recreation, troop housing, vehicle maintenance, mess, and administration
The undeveloped area north of the 25 Area is classified as a maneuver area and consists of gently
railing hills covered by natural vegetation (Innis-Tennebaum Architects, Inc., 1990) The nearest
. family housing is the Ranch House, located about I mile south of the site. The nearest
designated troop housing is in the Vado Del Rio (25) Area, approximately 200 feet from the site
No other family housing is located within several miles of the site and none is planned The
nearest base production well is less than 1 mile downgradient from Site 35.
Dominant habitats at Site 35 include nonnative grassland and southern willow scrub Coastal
sage scrub habitat is found southwest of the former sewage treatment plant. The willow scrub
habitat is dominated by willow, tree tobacco, and mulefat. Nonnative grassland species include
wild oat, brome, prickly sowthistle, and black mustard. White sage and coyote brush are the
dominant plant species in the coastal sage habitat. Bird species observed at Site 35 during the
March 1995 survey include Anna's hummingbird, bushth, common yellowthroat, red-tailed
hawk, and greater roadrunner. Deer mice, San Diego pocket mice, brush mice, and house mice
were trapped during the March survey. No reptiles or amphibians were observed during the
surveys. Aquatic and terrestrial invertebrates were observed during March, June, and October
1995 surveys.
2.6.15.2 Site History and Enforcement Activities
Operations at former Sewage Treatment Plant No. 7 began in 1951 and ended in the late 1970s or
early 1980s. The facility overflowed in the past, but no staining is present. AC/S.ES office staff
SCl/l-99AVPC/Pendlelo/RODI2l99.»piJ 2-147
-------
indicated that samples were not collected when the facility overflowed, and no additional
infonnataon is available on the chemistry, extent, or date of such incidents. After RI sampling of
other poruons of the site, the drying beds were discovered by base personnel while clearing brush
in the area.
Site 35 was investigated in 1991 and 1992 as part of the RFA SV for Site 129. Two surface and
three subsurface samples were collected from two soil borings advanced around the site
perimeter. Groundwater was encountered at a depth of 6 to 11 feet below surface No
groundwater samples were collected. Arsenic and antimony were detected in soil at
concentrations of 7.1 and 35.6 ppm, respectively (SWDIV, 1993a).
2.6.15.3 Summary of Site Characteristics
Site 35 was investigated in 1995 during the Group C RI (SWDIV, I996a). A total of 84 soil
samples were collected from .3 borings for metals analysis. A groundwater sample was also
collected at one of the beds by hydropunch methods for metals analysis. Sample locations are
shown in Figure 2-30.
A habitat and receptor survey was conducted and dominant vegetative habitats were identified at
Site 35 during March 1995. Bird and general wildlife surveys were conducted to evaluate the
potenual presence of special-status wildlife species. Mammal trapping (using Sherman live-
traps) was conducted to identify small mammal use of the site. During May through July 1997
add,tional biological surveys were conducted at Site 35 to evaluate whether special-status species
(i.e., California gnatcatcher and Least Bell's vireo) were present.
2.6.15.3.1 Geology and Hydrogeology
The geology of Site 35 consists of older Quaternary alluvium underlain by pre-Tertiary granitic
basement complex rocks. The alluvium consists of poorly graded to well-graded sand, sand with
varymg amounts of silt, and lenses of silt and clay. No borings were advanced to bedrock at
S.te 35. Borings at Site 29. approximately 1,500 feet north of the site, encountered granitic
basement rock approximately 15 feet below ground surface. Similar geologic conditions are
expected at Site 35. The thickness of the alluvium at Site 35 was not determined during drilling
but is assumed to be more than 50 feet.
SCI/l.99/WPC/P«nd!eto/ROD12199.wpd 2-148
-------
Groundwater was encountered at a depth of approximately 50 feet below ground surface at
Site 35. Based on site geology, groundwater is assumed to flow to the southwest, following
surface topography. No groundwater monitoring wells were installed at this site because, at the
time, depth to groundwater was unknown but was estimated to be 30 to 100 feet.
2.8.15.3.2 Soil Results
This section discusses analytical results from soil sampling at Site 35. Results are summarized ir
F.gure 2-30, which presents detected organics and any inorganics that exceed risk/hazard criteria.
Organfog
The only organic compound that exceeded PRGs was benzo(a)pyrene in 35SS012 (Figure 2-30)
Acenaphthene, benz(a)anthracene, benzo(b)fluoranthene, benzo(k)fluoranthene,
benzo(g,h,i)perylene, benzo(a)pyrene, chrysene, fluoranthene, indeno( 1 ,2,3-cd)pyrene,
phenanthrene, and pyrene were detected at concentrations ranging from 35 to 350 mg/kg.
Acenaphthene and pyrene were detected in the intermediate soil zone (5 to 10 feet), each at a
maximum concentration of 38 mg/kg. Most of the PAHs were detected primarily at or near
surface soil sample 35SSO 12.
Acetone and methylene chloride were detected in the lower drying bed area of Site 35. Acetone
was detected only once, at a depth greater than 10 feet. Methylene chloride was detected at all
depth intervals.
Benzoic acid was detected at depths greater than 10 feet at a maximum concentration of
120 mg/kg. Samples 35SSOI 1 and 35SS012 contained 4-chIoroanaline at concentrations of 1 80
and 2,200 mg/kg, respectively. N-nitroso-di-n-propylamine was detected at a concentration of
36 mg/kg at 7.5 feet in soil boring 35B-10. Phthalates were detected at depths greater than 10
feet at concentrations of up to 81 mg/kg.
The following metals exceeded PRGs: arsenic, beryllium, chromium, and manganese. Arsenic
and chromium concentrations in most soil borings exceeded PRGs and background at all depth
intervals. Beryllium exceeded the PRO in 35B-05, 35B-1 1, and 35B-12 but exceeded
background only in 35B-05 at a depth greater than 10 feet. Manganese exceeded the PRO only
at depths greater than 10 feet. Analytical results for soil borings 35B-01 , 35B-02, 35B-03, and
SCI/l-99/WPC/Pendi«o/ROD12IW.wpd 2-149
-------
35B-04 are not included in Figure 2-30 because they were used for site-specific background
2.6.15.3.3 Groundwater Results
No background values were calculated for Site 35 because .here are no upgradien, wells near the
s«e a*d few data points are availaWe for comparison. One groundwater hydropunch samp,e was
collected at Site 35 during the second quarter 1995.
Because of the recent discovery of a lower area previously covered by dense vegetation, the work
plan addendum for add.tional work at Site 35 (SWDIV, I995c) specified the collection of one
hydropunch groundwater sample to assess whether mobile COCs in soil are migrating to
groundwater. Although groundwater was originally estimated to be within 20 feet of ground
surface (soil sampling range) in this lower area, groundwater was not encountered within the
20-foot-depth mterval. Instead, a boring was advanced to 40 feet and a groundwater sample was
collected.
Benzene exceeded the tap-water PRO, and bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate exceeded the tap-water
PRG and MCL. Di-n-butylphthalate was detected at a concentration of 0.6 Mg/,; 2-butanone was
detected at a concentration of 3 ug/l; 4-methylphenol, benzene, and toluene were each detected at
a concentration of I ug/l. Bis(2-ethylhexy.)phtnalate, a common laboratory contaminant was
the only orgamc compound detected in both soil and groundwater samples.
Of the 12 metals detected in groundwater, the following exceeded PRGs and MCLs: aluminum
chrormum, barium, lead, cadmium, and nickel. The following metals exceeded tap-water PRGs'
but have no established MCLs: manganese, molybdenum, vanadium. A review of the request
for analysis and field logs indicated that the groundwater sample was not filtered in the field and
was preserved with hydrochloric acid. The high metals concentrations evidently are a result of
suspended solids reacting with the acid preservative prior to analysis. No inorganics detected in
so,l at concentrations that exceeded PRGs and background (arsenic) or organics detected at
concentrations that exceeded PRGs (benzo[a]Pyrene) were detected in the groundwater sample,
mdICatmg that these compounds have not migrated from soil to groundwater. As previously
stated, bis(2.ethylhexyl)phthalate was the only organic compound detected in both soil and
groundwater samples.
SCI/l-99/WPOPendleto/RODI2l99.wpd 2-150
-------
2.6.15.4 Summary of Risks Associated with Site 35
Human health and ecological risk assessments were conducted for Site 35 using data collected
during the RI. Risk assessment methodologies are summarized in Section 2.4.1.4. Risk
assessment summaries for Site 35 are presented in this section.
2.6.15.4.1 Human Health Risk Characterization
Metals (inorganics, including cyanide), S VOCs, and one VOC were detected in Site 35 soil.
Maximum concentrations for inorganics were detected at soil depth intervals extending from
ground surface to I foot and from 8.5 to 10 feet. Organics were detected primarily in the depth
interval from ground surface to I foot, with the exception of benzoic acid (9.5 to lOfeet),
acenaphthene (5.5 to 7 feet), and N-nitrosodi-n-propylamine (5.5 to 7 feet).
Representative concentrations for a residential exposure scenario, with consideration for
background, yielded a summed site-related risk of 4x10-* ILCR and a hazard of less than 1.0 HI.
The same concentrations under the commercial/industrial scenario resulted in a risk of less than
1x10-*. There are no plans to use this site for residential purposes, and the risk for residential
receptors was determined to be acceptable.
The groundwater pathway to humans is not currently complete, but groundwater could be used as
a drinking water source in the future. However, no site-related contaminants were detected in
groundwater at Site 35 and there is no indication that soil contaminants are leaching to
groundwater. Therefore, groundwater is considered protective of human health and the
environment.
2.6.15.4.2 Ecological Risk Assessment
The final risk screening results indicated that modified PLEs were exceeded for plants and the
California mouse. HQs for the following COPECs exceed 1.0, as shown in Figure 2-30: barium,
copper, lead, mercury, benzo(a)pyrene, and benzo(g,h,i)perylene.
Barium was not retained as a COEC because HQs for the California mouse are close to 1.0 (1.6, 2.5,
and 1.9, respectively). The background concentration of barium (97.7 mg/kg) contributed more'than
half of the HQs. The incremental HQs above background are less than or close to 1.0, indicating low
potential risk.
SCI/I -W/WPC/Pendleto/RODl 2199.\vpd 2-151
-------
Copper was not retained as a COEC because the average concentration is less than background
levels and the HQ for the average concentration is less than 1 .0.
Lead was not retained as a COEC because the only HQ exceeding 1.0 was for the California
mouse (1.9) and is close to 1.0, indicating low potential risk. HQs for all other representative
specnes are less than 1 .0. The average concentration of lead in the depth interval extending from
Z" 0 l° " l£SS than baCk8rOUnd "d thC HQ f°r thC 3Vera8e — tration is less
Mercury was not retained as a COEC because the only HQ exceeding 1 .0 was for the California
mouse. HQs for all other representative species are less than 1 .0. The average concentration of
mercury results in an HQ of 2.8 and indicates a low potential risk.
Benzo^pyrene and benZo(g,h,i)pery.ene were detected only once. The maximum detected
e dt
nsk The detected concentrates were flagged by the laboratory with a «J" qualifier, indicating
th^he concentranons were estimated. The detected values were estimated at .evels below the
CRDL (330 ug/kg). Based on the uncertainty associated with the detected concentrations, the
frequency of detection (one of four samples), and the low potential exposure to maximum
concentrations, benzo(a)pyrene and benzo(g,h,i)perylene were not retained as COECs.
No COECs were identified because COPECs generally were not detected at concentrations
exceedmg background and/or resulted in low potential risk to the environment.
2.6. 1 5.5 Description of the No Action Alternative
The no action alternative selected for Site 35 soil and groundwater includes no institutional
controls. Site 35 soil and groundwater are considered protective of human health and the
environment for the following reasons:
• The incremental cancer risk for soil using representative concentrations is 4x10-*
rcpresentative
SCl/»-99AVPC/Pendleto/RODI2199.npd 2-152
-------
There is no current pathway to groundwater at the site. Future risk to humans from
groundwater ,s unlikely because concentrations of contaminants detected i^
groundwater were determined not to pose a threat to human health and the
environment "lc
environment.
Although a few chemicals pose a potential ecological risk, the overall potential risk is
low^ The potential for exposure and adverse effects is considered low for soil baled
on the frequency at which risk contributors were detected, the background
contribution to risk, and the low potential for exposure.
2.6.16 Site 36. Debris Pile Area Behind Ponds at Sewage Treatment Plant 11
Site 36 consists of debris piles at Sewage Treatment Plant No. 11.
2.6.16.1 Site Name, Location, and Description
Site 36 - Debris Pile Area Behind Ponds at Sewage Treatment Plant 11, is an area of debris piles
containing glass bottles and scrap metal (Figure 1 -2). Glass and metal debris appear to have
been dumped down a nearby hillside and scattered between the trash piles. A geophysical survey
and S V sampling performed in this area indicated that the depth of debris between the piles is
very shallow and that the debris piles are 2 to 3 feet high. The maximum depth of debris is
approximately 2 feet below ground surface. Groundwater was encountered at approximately
6.5 feet below ground surface. Vegetation in this area is quite dense and includes sensitive plant
species such as willows.
2.6.16.2 Site History, Enforcement Activities, and Site Characteristics
Little is known about the history of Site 36. Bottles dating from the 1950s and scrap metal were
found in the debris piles. The actual debris piles were not discovered until a fire exposed them in
Sampling was conducted at Site 36 during the RFA (SV Site 207). SV soil samples were
collected from three borings adjacent to the two largest debris piles and in the area between the
piles (Figure 2-31).
SV soil samples were analyzed for VOCs, SVOCs, and metals. Except for low concentrations of
toluene (less than 200 mg/kg), no VOCs or SVOCs were detected. Chromium, cadmium, lead,
and mercury were detected at concentrations below risk-based levels (SWDIV, I993a). The only
analyte detected at a concentration exceeding PRGs was arsenic, at 4.3 mg/kg in one sample.
SCI/l-99/WPC/Pendlcto/RODI2l99.«pd 2-153
-------
The PRO for arsenic is 0.38 mg/kg for the cancer endpoint and 22 mg/ke for th
endpoint. & & or in
the three so.l samples analyzed for metals during the RFA SV contained no detectabT
concentrations of arsenic (Fieure 2-T n Th» •• , aetectable
™ M ^ )- °ne S01' samP|e concentration of 4 3 me/ke is
Sw^aiy^f&sifs-fissoefofaf Wj(h s/fe 3g —
2.6. f6.4 Description of the No Action Alternative
for site 36 soii
c d
controls. Site 36 so,, and groundwater are considered protective of human health and the
ue 37 is part of an agncultural lease area at MCB Camp Pendleton.
2.6.1 7.1 Site Name, Location, and Description
,nc,udes a seined spin area adjacent to U,e fonne,
No perennia, surface water is present in the vicinity of Site 37. Surface «... tne
ephemera, and fol.ows the 8en,,y sloptog ^ surface „ fc
SCt/l-99AVPC/Pcnd!cto/ROD!2l99\vpd -2- 1 54
-------
rainfall events, surface water percolates into the subsurface, evaporates, or runs off the site and
drams into San Mateo Creek, which eventually discharges into the Pacific Ocean approximately
1 mile downstream from the site.
Land use in the vicinity of Site 37 consists of activities associated with agricultural farmland
The site ,s crossed frequently by civilian personnel associated with farm operations Land
surrounding Site 37 includes agricultural fields and natural vegetation. The area south of the site
is undeveloped and contains coastal wetland vegetation. The nearest designated troop housing
area is San Mateo (62) Area, approximately 2 miles north-northwest of the site. The nearest base
production well is approximately 1 mile southwest of Site 37.
^^
bare ground and an assortment of buildings and storage areas. Wildlife species observed near the
site dunng the reconnaissance survey include western kingbird, American crow, cliff swallow,
cottontail, and California ground squirrel.
2. 6. 1 7.2 Site History and Enforcement Activities
Chemicals associated with farming operations at the San Clemente Ranch are the probable
source of contamination at Site 37. This site was added to the list of RI/FS sites following the
RFA (SWDIV, 1993a). In addition, in 1994, a hand-dug well from which farm workers regularly
drank was discovered near the pesticide mixing area. This well and another were abandoned on
1 5 May 1 996, in accordance with State and County codes and under San Diego County
Department of Environmental Health Permit Nos. W63158 and W63159.
Sampling was conducted at the San Clemente Ranch during the RFA as SV Site 255. Soil
samples from the pesticide-handling area were analyzed for VOCs, SVOCs, pesticides and
PCBs, and chlorinated herbicides. Samples were analyzed using a mobile laboratory, and
confirmation analysis was provided by an off-site laboratory. Both pesticides and herbicides
were detected in soil at concentrations exceeding PRGs. A water sample was also collected from
the nearby hand-dug well. The water sample was analyzed for pesticides and PCBs, chlorinated
herbicides, and general chemistry, but no contaminants were detected. Depth to groundwater in
this well was 20 feet below ground surface.
SCl/l.99/WPC/Pendlelo/RODI2!99.wpU 2-155
-------
During the RFA, a sediment sample (SV255B-05) was also collected in the drainage ditch at
Sue 37 to evah*te runoff. This sample location was recommended for no further action because
detected metals and pesticides were below screening levels.
The POL-handling area contained a fuel dispensing area and underground fuel tanks The
contaminant, in this area were limited to petroleum product constituents. This area has been
addressed under the UST program at the base (SWDIV, 1993c).
2.6.17,3 Summary of Site Characteristics
Site 37 was investigated in June and July .996 during the RI for Group D sites (SWDIV, I997b)
A total of 27 soil samples were collected from six borings and two surface locations. Samples
were analyzed for metals, PCBs, pesticides, and chlorinated herbicides. Groundwater was
sampled from three temporary well locations and one permanent well. Groundwater was
2.6.17.3.1 Geology and Hydrogeology
Shallow geology at this site is characterized by poorly consolidated alluvium consisting of silty
sand overlying very fine grained to fine-grained sand. Groundwater was encountered at a depth
of 15 feet below ground surface at Site 37. Based on site geology, groundwater is assumed to
flow to the southwest, following surface topography.
2.6.17.3.2 Soil Results
This section discusses soil analytical results from RI activities at Site 37. Results are
summarized in Figure 2-32, which presents detected organics and any inorganics that exceed
risk/hazard criteria.
Qrcanics
The chlorinated pesticides 4,4'-DDE and 4,4'-DDT exceeded PRGs in surface samples from
bonngs 37B-01, 37B-03, and 37B-04. In addition, 4.4'-DDE exceeded the PRG in surface
sample 37SS001, as did 4,4'-DDT in surface sample 37SS002 (Figure 2-32). The maximum
detected concentrations of 4,4'-DDE and 4,4'-DDT were 1.7 and 3.8 mg/kg, respectively
SCr/l-99/WPC/Pendteto/RODI2l99.ttj>d 2-156
-------
Toxaphene was detected in the surface sample from 37MW-01 at a concentration (4.7 mg/kg)
exceeding the PRO (014 mg/kg). The chlorinated pesticide 4,4'-DDD was also detected in a few
samples but at concentrations below the evaluation criterion. The maximum detected
concentration of 4,4'-DDD was 0.43 mg/kg. Nine other organic compounds were detected in the
surface sample from boring 37MW-01 at concentrations below evaluation criteria: gamrna-
chlordane, alpha-chlordane, endosulfan I, endosulfan II, endrin, endrin aldehyde, endrin ketone,
aldrin, and methoxychlor. Of these compounds, endosulfan I had the highest concentration at •
0.19 mg/kg.
Arsenic was detected in 24 samples and beryllium was detected in 1 8 out of 30 samples at
concentrations exceeding PRGs in Site 37 soil (Figure 2-32). All beryllium detections were
below the background concentration of 1 .42 mg/kg. In general, detected arsenic results only
slightly exceeded the background concentration of 4.25 mg/kg; the maximum arsenic
concentration was 6 mg/kg.
2.6.17.3.3 Groundwater Results
This section discusses groundwater analytical results from RI activities at Site 37.
Organic!} .
No organics were detected at concentrations exceeding MCLs; however, the dieldrin
concentration of 0.0065 ug/I in the sample from well 37MW-01 (approximate groundwater level
of 16 feet below ground surface) exceeds the tap-water PRO of 0.0042 ug/1 (Figure 2-32). Six
other organics were detected in well 37MW-01 at concentrations below evaluation criteria:
4,4'-DDD, 4,4'-DDE, 4,4'-DDT, endosulfan I, endosulfan II, and endosulfan sulfate. Endosulfan
I was also detected in the sample from temporary well 37GWT-03 (approximate groundwater
level of 16 feet below ground surface) at a concentration of 0.026 pg/l which is the highest
organic concentration measured in Site 37 groundwater
Inorganics
No inorganics were detected at concentrations exceeding MCLs (Figure 2-32) or tap-water
PRGs. A detection of chromium VI, reported at 7 ug/1 in well 37MW-01, was rejected during
data evaluation because it exceeds the total chromium concentration by approximately one order
of magnitude.
SCI/I -99/WPC/Pendleto/ROD 12 199.wpd 2-1 57
-------
2.6.17.3.4 Summary
Chlorinated pesticides 4,4'-DDD, 4.4.-DDE, and 4,4'-DDT generaUy were found i, the upper
5 fee. of so.1 throughout ,he she; however. 4,4'-DDE and 4.4'-DDT exceeded PRGS only in
surface samples. Arsenic and beryllium were ,he on.y inorganics detected a, concen Jons
exceedmg PRGs. bu, concen.ra.ions were either below or only slightly above background
of Ae parameters detected in Sile 37 groundwater exceeded MCLs.
2.6.17.4 Summary of Risks Associated with Site 37
Human health and ecological risk assessments were conducted for Site 37 using data collected
dunng ,he RI. Risk assessment methodologies are summarized in Section 24,4 ^T
assessment summaries for Site 37 are presented in this section.
2.B.17.4.1 Human Health Risk Characterization
Currem/ruture workers and future residents cou.d be exposed to soil contaminants through
,nc,den,al ,nges,,on. derma, contact, and halation ofparticula.es. The cumulative residential
nsk from the maximum detected COPCs in soil is 4x,0" and is primarily attributable to ars 1
(approx-mately 40 percen, of the toul risk), bery.lium (approximately ,0 percen, of ,he ,o«a,
' Lt ;«TbuTr', I(TXi?'e'y "° P=rCCT' °f'he '^ riSl°' ExC'Udil« «» P— «"«-
nsk a«nbu,able ,o background me^ls, the increment residential site risk from maximum
concentrauons detected is 2.1x,0". Using more representative concenuations (95 percent UCL)
the .ncremenui residential cancer risk is LSx.O", with ,he majority of risk anributalle .0
pesticides (approximately 89 percent of the risk).
The cumulative residential HI from the maximum detected COPCs is ! .1 and is primarily
attribute to metals (approximately 86 percen. of tf,e total hazard). Excluding the portion of
•otal hazard attnbutaWe to background meals, the incremental residential site hazarTL,
maximum detected COPCs is 0.2.
The-cumulative industrial cancer risk from maximum detected COPCs in soil is 7 4x10- and is
pnmanly attributable to arsenic (approximately 34 percent of the total risk), beryllium
(approximately 7 percent of the total risk), and pesticides (approximately 51 percent of the total
n k). Excludmg «he portion of risk attributable to background metals, the incremental industrial
site nsk from maxunum detected COPCs in soil is 4.5x10- The incremental industrial site
hazard ,s 0.02. Using the more representative soil concentration for arsenic and excluding the
SCI/l-99/WPC/Pendltfto/RODI2l99.wpd 2-1 58
-------
portion of total risk and hazard attributable to background metals, the incremental industrial site
risk and hazard are 4x 10'6 and 0.01, respectively.
The results of the HHRA indicate that the incremental residential (1.8xlO'J) and industrial
(4x10^) cancer risks at Site 37 are within the risk management range and the incremental
residential <0.2) and industrial (0.01) hazard indices are below the threshold criterion of 1 0 The
maximum lead concentration (40.1 mg/kg) is below the residential screening criteria. The main
nsk contributors are pesticides associated with the current use of the site as a farm. Toxaphene is
the main contributor to risk but was detected in only 1 of 20 samples, in the surface sample from
boring 37MW-01.
The site is currently used as a farm and there are no plans to change the land use. The risk for the
current commercial/industrial scenario is 4X10* for the pesticide-handling area. Receptors are
not expected to be in the pesticide-handling area their entire time on site. Therefore, the soil is
considered .protective.of human health.
Future residents could be exposed to groundwater contaminants through ingestion, although
there is no current complete pathway. The residential risk from ingestion of groundwater using
maximum detected concentrations is 5.8x10"' and is primarily attributable to arsenic
(approximately 97 percent of the total risk). Arsenic detections in Site 37 soil were
approximately within the background concentration. The 95 percent UCL concentration of
arsenic in soil at Site 37 was calculated to be 4.9 mg/kg and the background concentration is
4.25 mg/kg. Arsenic is expected to be naturally occurring in groundwater as well. The
maximum reported groundwater concentration of arsenic (2.5 ug/l) is below the MCL (50 ng/1).
The majority of the risk from groundwater is likely due to naturally occurring arsenic and is not a
site-related threat to human health. Pesticides represent an incremental risk of 2x10-*. The
pesticide contributors include 4,4'-DDD, along with its isomers, and dieldrin. These pesticides
were detected in only one of the four groundwater samples collected at Site 37 (37MW-01). The
total noncarcinogenic health hazard associated with ingestion of groundwater is 0.8, which is
below the threshold criterion of 1.0.
Groundwater at Site 37 is considered protective of human health because there is no current
pathway for human receptors to groundwater. The risk above background is at the lower end of
the risk management range (2xlO'6) and is due to pesticides, as would be expected given the
SCt/l-99/WPC/Pendkto/RODI2l99.wp(! 2-159
-------
urren fang p tlces a, ,
. ogrounwater
from locanons upgradiem of ,he site. Topographical*, me ocean is , ess «han , mile
downgradient from the farm.
2.6.17.4.2 Ecological Risk Assessment
Site 37 was no, earned through the quantitative or qualitative ecclogica! evaluations because
su,,ab,e wUdiife habi«a, is no, avai,ab,e on si,e and none of to po,e«ia, expos
expected ,o be compiete. Site 37 inc,ud=s a pesUcide-handiing area ,oca,ed L
«e ds a, the San Ciemente Ranch. No surface water was observed in the ,-Md
a. the ,«, An ephemera, Surface-water drainage ». Uuough the POL-hLling
2.6.17.5 Description of the No Action Alternative
—
contrnic Q-, ,, -, for Site 37 soil ^ groundwater includes no institutional
controls. Site 37 soil and groundwater are considered protective of human health and the
environment for the following reasons:
concentrations^ ^Than^T*"^6^1^"1131 eXp°SUre scenario Usin8 maximum
and 4x,0- ^rierftecur™, commercial
* ±1!;' !1™ l!athWay to gro"ndwater at the site. Future risk to
KCJ/l-99/WPC/Pendlelo/RODI2)99.wpd 2-160
-------
• Wildlife habitat does not exist at the site, which is used for farm operations and is
surrounded by agricultural fields. There are no complete pathways for ecological
receptors. As such, the site is considered protective.
2.6.18 Sites 38, 39, 41, and 42
Sites 38, 39, 41, and 42 were recommended for inclusion in the MCB Camp Pendleton RI/FS
because elevated concentrations of arsenic were detected along sewer lines in several base areas
as reported in the draft final RFA report (SWDIV. 1993a). Because arsenic is the only COPC at
these sites and the selected alternative is the same, the discussion/rationale presented in this
section pertains to the sites collectively.
2.6.18.1 Site Name, Location, Description, and History
The sewer lines include the following:
Site 38 - 52 Area Sewer Line, Building 52188
Site 39 - 41 Area Sewer Line, Buildings 41300 and 41346
Site 41-13 Area Sewer Line, Building 13128
Site 42 - 13 Area Sewer Line, Building 13129.
Site locations are shown in Figure 1-2. These sites were selected during the RFA to represent
potential impact to human health and the environment from sewer line breaks. Locations were
selected near industrial facilities and where sewer lines crossed major roads. Sewer line sites in
the 13 Area were selected where previous unauthorized discharges were reported.
Soil samples were collected along sewer lines during the RFA because interviews indicated that
chemicals, although not specifically arsenic, could have been disposed of in sewer lines in the
past. The soil samples were analyzed for VOCs, SVOCS, and metals. No COPCs were
identified other than arsenic, which exceeded the calculated PRO. Because, at that time,
background concentrations of metals had not yet been determined for any base area, the sites
with elevated arsenic concentrations were recommended for further investigation under
CERCLA. No interviews or other evidence indicated any disposal of arsenic-containing
chemicals in sewer lines and no evidence, past or present, was found to suggest that arsenic-
containing chemicals were disposed of in the sewer lines.
SCI/l.99AVPC/Pendleto/RODI2l99.wptl 2-161
-------
2.6.18.2 Summary of Site Characteristics
Arsenic results and sample locations investigated during the RFA are shown in Figure 2-33 for
Site 38, Figure 2-34 for Site 34, and Figure 2-35 for Sites 41 and 42. Site-specific background
concentrations of metals in soil were not determined. The RFA data were compared against
Santa Margarita Basin background during preparation of the revised work plan for Group D Rl
sites. The Santa Margarita Basin background data set is considered representative of Sites 38,
39,40,41, and 42 because it is the largest background data set for the base and is in geographic
proximity to these sites, which are located in the San Luis Rey Basin. Background for the latter
basin had not yet been determined.
As part of the RI for Group C sites (SWDIV, 1996a), Santa Margarita Basin background for
arsenic in soil was determined statistically to be 4.25 mg/kg. The average detected concentration
of arsenic in the RFA soil samples for Sites 38, 39,41, and 42 is 4.0 mg/kg. This value was
determined by assigning a value of one-half the reporting limit (reporting limit is 3.0 mg/kg for
arsenic) for samples reported as "nondetects." On this basis, arsenic concentrations appear to be
within background.
No consistency was observed in the data relative to the depth of the sewer lines. If elevated
concentrations of arsenic were due to disposal of arsenic-containing materials in sewer lines and
sewer line leakage to the surrounding soil, higher concentrations of arsenic should be found at or
below the depth of the sewer line, not above the line. However, this is not the case. Six of the
samples containing detectable concentrations of arsenic were collected above the sewer line.
This suggests that the concentrations of arsenic are not due to disposal of arsenic-containing
chemicals in the sewer lines.
2.6.18.3 Summary of Risks Associated with Sites 38, 39, 41, and 42
A risk assessment was not conducted for Sites 38, 39,41, and 42. The only chemical that did not
meet the risk screening criteria of the RFA was arsenic, which was shown to be within
background concentrations. Ecological pathways were determined to be incomplete because the
sewer line sites are located in developed areas where there is little or no wildlife habitat. Soil
and groundwater at Sites 38,39,41, and 42 were determined to be protective of human health for
the following reasons:
SCIM-99AVPC/Pendlcto/RODI2I99 wpd 2-162
-------
The concentrations of arsenic in RFA soil samples are due to naturally occurring
processes, not to any site-specific disposal practices, past or present.
The concentrations of arsenic in soil are found above and below the depth of the
sewer lines, thus indicating that the sewer lines are not the source.
No evidence was found to suggest that any past or present operations in these areas
could have been responsible for elevated concentrations of arsenic in soil.
Using the noncancer endpoint of 22.0 mg/kg, the only sample exceeding an HI of 1.0
is 264B2 (Site 41), which was collected at a depth of 13 to 15 feet and below the 10-
foot depth generally accepted as the maximum for human exposure under a future
residential scenario. Using an industrial scenario, the noncancer endpoint for arsenic
in soil is 380 mg/kg.
The lack of soil contamination eliminates the potential for impact to groundwater.
Therefore, groundwater is considered protective of human health.
2.6.18.4 Description of the No Action Alternative
The no action alternative selected for Sites 38, 39,41, and 42 soil and groundwater includes no
institutional controls. Sites 38, 39,41. and 42 soil and groundwater are considered protective of
human health and the environment for the following reasons:
The detected soil concentrations were less than risk screening criteria or were within
background concentrations.
The lack of soil contamination eliminates the potential for impact to groundwater
from these sites.
The sewer line sites are in developed areas with little or no wildlife habitat and no
complete pathway to ecological receptors.
2.6.fS Site 40-13 Area Sewer Line, Building 13103
Site 40 consists of the sewer line near Building 13103.
2.6.1S,1 Site Name, Location, and Description
Site 40-13 Area Sewer Line, Building 13103, is located approximately 0.25 mile east of the
intersection of 14th Street and Vandegrift Boulevard (Figure 1-2). The site is on the north side of
SCI/I -99/WPCVPendIeto/ROD 121 W.xvpj] 2-163
-------
14th Street, directly in front of Building 13182, approximately 1,200 feet from the crest of a hiJl.
The surface of the site slopes gently to the east and drains toward Vandegrift Boulevard.
Site 40 consists primarily of a buried sewer pipeline and an aboveground manhole adjacent to
Building 13182 and the surrounding parking lot. A limited amount of landscaping (lawn)
surrounds the site. The site contains no habitat suitable for special-status species and no such
species are expected to be present. Wildlife species observed near the site during the
reconnaissance survey include American crow and western kingbird; no animals were seen
directly on site.
No perennial surface water is present in the vicinity of Site 40. Surface water at the site is
generally ephemeral and follows the gently sloping ground surface to the east. The area receives
only low annual rainfall, primarily during winter months. During significant rainfall events,
surface water percolates into the subsurface, evaporates, or runs off the site.
The 13 Area is used for training activities, recreation, troop housing, vehicle maintenance, mess,
and administration. The nearest family housing, Serra Mesa Housing, is about 0.75 mile
southeast of the site. The nearest designated troop housing is within the 13 Area. No base
production wells are located in the San Luis Rey Basin or within a 1-mile radius of Site 40.
2.6.19.2 Site History and Enforcement Activities
Sewer line sites were selected during the RFA to represent potential impact to human health and
the environment from sewer line breaks. Locations were selected near industrial facilities and
where sewer lines crossed major roads. Sewer line sites in the 13 Area were selected where
previous unauthorized discharges were reported.
Soil samples were collected along sewer lines during the RFA because interviews indicated that
chemicals, although not specifically arsenic, could have been disposed of in sewer lines in the
past. The soil samples were analyzed for VOCs, SVOCS, and metals. No COPCs.were
identified other than arsenic, which exceeded the PRO. Because, at that time, background
concentrations of metals had not yet been determined for any base area, Site 40 was
recommended for further investigation under CERCLA. Further evaluation of the RFA data
comparing results with background levels calculated during the RI for Group C sites (SWDIV,
SCl/l-99AVPC/Pendlelo/ROD12l99.wpd 2-164
-------
1996a) indicated that the arsenic concentration in one soil sample from Site 40 significantly
exceeded background.
2.6.19.3 Summary of Site Characteristics
Site 40 was investigated in June and July 1996 during the RI for Group D sites (SWDIV, I997b).
Seven soil samples were collected from one boring (Figure 2-36) and were analyzed for metals.
Groundwater was not sampled because none was encountered prior to drilling refusal at 40 feet
below ground surface. A habitat and receptor survey was conducted and dominant vegetation
types and corresponding wildlife habitats were identified. Wildlife observed and evidence of
wildlife use (e.g., scat or tracks) were also noted.
2.6.19.3.1 Geology and Hydrogeology
Shallow geology at Site 40 consists primarily of stream-deposited alluvium of Holocene age
overlying the Eocene-age La Jolla Group bedrock. The alluvium consists of poorly graded to
well-graded sand and varying amounts of silt.
Based on site geology, groundwater is assumed to flow to the east, following surface topography.
Boring 40B-01 was drilled to a maximum depth of 40 feet below ground surface without
encountering groundwater. Groundwater was consistently encountered at a depth of about 20
feet below grade in boreholes drilled for UST studies at the adjacent 12 and 13 Areas,
approximately 0.2 mile north of Site 40 (SWDIV, I996b). However, 12 and 13 Areas are
topographically lower than Site 40 by about 80 feet. As such, groundwater at Site 40 is
estimated to be more than 50 feet below grade.
2.6.19.3.2 Analytical Results
No organics were detected in soil; arsenic and beryllium were the only inorganic compounds
detected, but concentrations were below background (Figure 2-36). Despite efforts to collect
water samples, groundwater was not encountered at Site 40.
2.6.13.4 Summary of Risks Associated with Site 40
Human health and ecological risk assessments were conducted for Site 40 using data collected
during the RI. Risk assessment methodologies are summarized in Section 2.4.1.4. Risk
assessment summaries for Site 40 are presented in this section.
SCl/l-99/WPC/Pendl«o/RODl2l99.wpd 2-165
-------
2.6.19.4.1 Human Health Risk Characterization
COPCs detected in soil are limited to metals. Current/nature workers and future residents could
be exposed to soil contaminants through incidental ingestion of soil, dermal contact with soil
and inhalation of soil particulates. '
The cumulative residential risk from maximum detected soil COPCs is 5 OxlO« and is
completely attributable to beryllium. The maximum concentration of beryllium (0.7 mg/kg) is
less than the background concentration for beryllium in the San Luis Rey Basin. Excluding the
port,™ of nsk attributable to background metals, the incremental site risk is less than ixl A
The cumulative residential HI from maximum detected metals is 0.35. Excluding the portion of
total hazard attnbutable to background metals, the incremental residential hazard from the
maximum detected COPCs is 0.03. The maximum lead concentration (12.6 mg/kg) is below
residential screening criteria.
Site 40 soil is considered protective of human health because the incremental risk and hazard are
less than I x IO'5 and I.0, respectively.
Groundwater is not considered a complete exposure pathway for either current/future workers or
foture res,dents. Groundwater sampling was not performed at Site 40 during the RI because
dnlhng refusal occurred in weathered bedrock at less than 50 feet below ground surface before
encountering sufficient groundwater for sampling purposes. Site 40 is not located above a
shallow aquifer associated with any of the four major groundwater basins at MCB Camp
Pendleton (i.e., San Mateo, San Onofre, Las Flores, or Santa Margarita Basin). The site is
topographically higher than and isolated from the aquifers associated with these major basins
Based on the above, groundwater at Site 40 is considered protective of human health.
2.6.19.4.2 Ecological Risk Assessment
Site 40 was not carried through the quantitative or qualitative ecological evaluation because
suitable wildlife habitat is not available on site and none of the potential exposure pathways are
expected to be complete.
SCI/l-99WPC/Pcndlelo/RODI2l99w[Hl 2-366
-------
2.6.W.5 Description of the No Action Alternative
The no action ahernadve seiected fo, Site 40 soil and groundwater inc|udes „„ .ns
onuois. S,,= 40so,, and groundwatera« considered pratec,ive of human heahhand ,hT
environment for the following reasons:
• The incremental cancer risk for soil is less than 1 xlO'6
• The incremental hazard index for soil is less than 1.0
as nosuitab,ewi«dlifehabitatandnOCompletepathwaystoec0logica,
SCl/l-99/WPC/Pendleto/RODI2I99 wpd 2-167
-------
(intentionally blank)
SCI/|.99/WPC/Pcndlelo/RODI2199.wpd 2-168
-------
TABLE 2-1
Remedial Action Standards for Soil at
Site8lA,1D,1E,1F,and2A
MCB Camp Pendteton
(Sheet 1 of 3)
Contaminant
of Concern
Site 1 A
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Boron
Chromium
Copper
Iron
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Site 10'
Antimony
Arsenic
Chromium
Copper
Iron
Lead
Zinc
Sits IE
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Cadmium
Chromium
Cobalt
Copper
Maximum
Concentration(mg/kg)
27
51
704
42
61
25.000
148.000
8.800
12.100
4.9
6.8
93
7.390
35
6.4
37
739
30.100
1.100
2.880
47.200
140
11
9.3
104
25
1.660
Remediation
Standard (mg/kg)
(0-Sfaet)
8.8* 1
17*
133'
3.6e .
16*
12c
20.200*
12°
199*
0.2e
1.4"
40*
56*
8.8*
4.3d
33d
26*
26.459*
29*
111*
20.999*
8.8*
4.3d
9b
33d
13*
26*
Remediation
Standard (mg/kg)
(5-10 feet)
_
22b
_
_
_
2800b
_
130b
_
...
5.4b
_
—
_
.«
_
_
—
_
—
31b
4.3d
9b
33d
—
-------
TABLE 2-1
Remedial Action Standards for Soil at
Sites 1A, ID, 1E,1F, and 2A
MCB Camp Pendfeton
(Sheet 2 of 3)
Remediation
Standard (mg/kg)
0-6
Remediation
Standard (mg/kg)
10 feet
Contaminant
of Concern
Maximum
Coiicentrationfm
Arsenic
Co
Iron
Lead
Zinc
•
e
m
Antimon
Arsenic
ariurn
Cadmium
hromium
Cobalt
^_ r
Iron
ead
Manganese
Mercy
Molybdenum
Silver
•MK^^M
hallium
4'-DDD
4--DDE
-------
TABLE 2-1
Remedial Action Goals for Soil at
Sites 1A, 1D, 1E, 1F, and 2A
MCB Camp Pendteton
(Sheet 3 of 3)
Remediation goal was set at background calculated for the 0- to 5-foot depth interval.
"Remediation goal was set at the risk-based PRO.
"Remediation goal was set at the most stringent RLE of the species evaluated for the site.
"Remediation goal was set at background calculated for the 0- to 10-foot depth Interval.
"Remediation goal was set at a soil concentration estimated to be protective of groundwater.
'Although listed remediation goats are applicable to 5 feet, contamination Is expected to be
present only to 3 feet below ground surface at Site 1D.
mg/kg - Milligrams per kilogram.
PLE - Preliminary limit of exposure.
PRG - Preliminary remediation goal.
- Denotes that the contaminant Is not of concern at the specified depth range.
-------
'.V.';!£A'-:.'^j£.y.". ?.:?*^' ; . '.',"(• «.., '<
vh^-:^:?/ ^|»>*= •:. <%%,
?)fe:L--J::£;-,"f" •1117.- • >: ^aLMllfe....
• i i-"i|
:-*m
1AB-02 |
1AGWT-011
COUPOUmi
/f//iimm^^^t
am/I II I '••'.'.'•,) •, .AV.n *'.\» ill '
SOIL BORING LOCATION
TEMPORARY WELL SAMPLE LOCATION
SURFACE-WATER FLOW DIRECTION
NOT DETECTED
NOT APPLICABLE
REPEAT SAMPLE COLLECTED AT i FOOT
ANTIMONY
ARSENIC
BARHtU
BORON
CADMIUM
CHROMIUM
COPPER
IRON
LEAD
MANGANESE
MERCURY
UOLYBOENUM
SELENIUM
THALLIUM
VANADIUM
ZINC
BENZCXoJPtRENE
4.4--OOE
<4'-DOT
GROUNOWATER
COMPOUND (uaM
MANGANESE
EEC
3!
22
3.300
5.900
9
77.000
2.800
NA
130
3,200
100.000
380
380
5.4
540
23.000
0.06!
t.3
1.3
ELE BACKCRfXINft
0.3
0.3
65
3.6
9
1.5
12
32
12
109
0.2
6
1
0.4
6
14
NA
0.037
0.074
16.0
16
133
NA
1.5
13.2
4.8
19.883
10
199
0.05
7.4
0.8
1.4
36
56
NA
NA
NA
TAP-WATER PRQ
1,700
NOTES:
1. SOIL CONCENTRATIONS OVEN IN MILLIGRAMS PER
K10CRAM. GROUNDWATER CONCENTRATIONS ARE GIVEN IN
MICROGRAMS PER LITER.
2. THIS FIGURE PRESENTS CONSTITUENTS EXCEEDING PRGs OR
PLEs AND BACKGROUND. AS APPLICABLE.
3. SOIL CONCENTRATIONS OUTLINED IN BOLD EXCEED PRGs
AND BACKGROUND.
4. SOIL CONCENTRATIONS DENOTED WITH AN ASTERISK (•)
EXCEED PlEs AND BACKGROUND CONCENTRATIONS. AS
APPLICABLE.
5. GROUNDWATER CONCENTRATION OUTLINED IN BOLD EXCEED
PRG«.
SCALE
SEE
400
FIGURE 2-1
800 FEET
SITE 1A - REFUSE BURMNO GROUND
B* U AREA
-------
K1UB-18 $ LOCAT|ON SAMpLEO
tOSSODl O. SURFACE SOIL SAMPLE
1DS8003 • BORtHOU LOCAHON
© Q^'JORfNC VffU LOCAHON WITH
(108-04) «" BORING NUMBER IN PARENTHESES
^_ SURFACE-WATER FLOW DIRECTION
*22"2'A/E WOUNOWATER FLOW
NO NOT
NA NO!
SOIL
INORGANICS (mn /itf
ANTIMONY
ARSENIC
8ORON
CHROMIUM
COPPER
IRON
LEAD
MANGANESE
MERCURY
ZINC
GROUNDWATER
ARSENIC
BERYLUUM
MANGANESE
CROUNOWATER
CKCAN'CS ftlfl/Q
DETECTED
APPLICABtE
l) PRG
31
0.38
5.900
02
2,800
NA
130
3,200
23
23.000
Jl TAP WATF^
O.U16
1,700
TAP-WATFI^
ELE
1.3 •
2.0
21
7
13
186
13
390
0.6
BO
-EBGUSL
50
4
NA
PR£ MCI E
iACKGRgUND
8.4
4.3.
NA
326
26.0
26.469
21.7
655
0.08
104
10.1
NA
674
1.2-OfCHLOROEtHANE 0.12 0.5
NOTES:
'' S,?ILSONCENT:RAT'ONS GI^N 'N MILLIGRAMS PFR
3. THIS HGURE ONLY PRESENTS CHEMICALS WITH Qnn
CONCENTRATIONS EXCEEDING BACKOTOUNO I^D PRG,
" JNALY1ES W1FH CONCLNTRAHONS GREArER
AT LEAST ^
DCNQT£:0 WTH AN ASIEWSK f)
S AN° HACKG«OUND. AS ( }
FIGURE 2-2
-------
LS^J# //// -\< ^-•
-------
ANTIMONY
ARSENIC
BORON
CADMIUM
CHROMIUM
COBALT
COPPER
IRON
LEAD
MANGANESE
MOLYBDENUM
SILVER
21NC
1FB-03 • SO|L BORING LOCATION (TW
INDICATES GROUNDWATER SAMPLE)
- SURFACE-WATER FLOW DIRECTION
ND NOT DETECTED
NA NOT APPLICABLE
CROUNOWATER
.CQMFQUNO
aVEN W MILLIGRAMS PER
CONCENTRA.ONS G.VEN ,N
TOPOGRAPHIC REFFRFNCF;
MARINE CORPS BASE CAMP PENOLETON
GENERAL DEVELOPMENT MAPS 368. 360
AND 3 7A,
DATE: DECEMBER 1987
•C^AP^A^o^N
^^^'^^
\'44im. \ -•..-.--.
SITE IF - REFUSE BURNING GROUND
N 4.1 ABFA
-------
X1*Jt«. / / * • *•! ' l_'"-v— ^--i i
r^;-> J-- • j^^feHf
r r "\-1<^<^i -:. • yv / r^^-?^*-.-\ •
/ m \\V--.'—-^^>N^ \ v^»^
f\VT^~-->^^>-^4lf
w^'>-:^^-^ ^^^-'^4
M^£is^^^?&^W
ND
NA
HPCDF
COMPOUND
I m SOIL SORING LOCATION
:•*- SURFACE-WATER fLOW DIRECTION
NOT DETECTED
NOT APPLICABLE
HEPTACHLOROOIBENZOfURANS
ALUMINUM
ANTIMONY
ARSENIC
BARIUM
BORON
CADMIUM
IOTAL CHROMIUM
COBALT
COPPER
IRON
LEAD
MANGANESE
MERCURY
' MOLYBDENUM
NICKEL
SILVER
THALLIUM
VANADIUM
ZINC
M'-ODE
4.4'- DDT
1,2.3. 4.6. /.B-HPCDF
PRO
77.000
J1
O.JSB
5.JOO
5.900
9
77.000
4.600
2.800
NA
130
3.200
100.000
380
1.500
380
5.4
380
23.000
1.9
1.3
1.3
0.00038
Pit
769
1.2
NA
65
37
9
12
1.0
12
350
12
783
0.6
6
63
5
0.37
7
163
90
0.6
1.1
NA
BACKGROUND
16.398
8.38
16
385
NA
1.52
13
12.8
4.B
19.883
10
199
0.05
7.36
4.1
1.36
1.33
40
59.7
NA
NA
NA
NA
NOTES:
1. CONCENTRATIONS GIVEN IN MILLIGRAMS PtR KILOGRAM.
?. THIS FIGURE PRESENTS CONSTITUENTS EXCEEDING PRGs
OR PLEs AND BACKGROUND. AS APPLICABLE.
3 CONCENTRATIONS OUTLINED IN BOLD EXCEED PRCs AND
BACKGROUND. AS APPLICABLE
4. CONCENTRATIONS DENOTED Will AN ASTERISK (*)
EXCEED PLEs AND BACKGROUND. AS APPLICABLE.
5. I (RE) IS A RESAMPLE AT 1 FOOT
800 rrrT
FIGURE 2-5
-------
•
ii^H (V<>:r:^«''
• ""fis \ / i x/>—" ~~ii~:-^VJ'
r*-^'-,!^
w/m//,M&™ $<$&&
///f/ :.^--::s.v\\\\\>x\\
1AU 02 B SCHL BORING LOCATION
1AGWT-01 • TEMPORARY WELL SAMPLE LOCATION
*~ SURFACE-WATER FLOW DIRECTION
, EXCAVATION AREA ESTIMATED BASED
.. "' ON HISTORICAL AERIAL AND
- GEOPHYSICAL SURVEYS AND SITE-
SPECIFIC FEATURES.
AREA f
1
2
3
4
5
AREA
(acres)
0.4
0.9
0.6
0.4
0.7
EXCAVATION
DEPTH (FT)
5
10
5
5
5
ESTIMATED
VOLUME (YD3)
3.264
14,815
5.000
2.963
5.647
TOTAL
3.0
31.689
TOPOGRAPHIC
MARINE CORPS BASE CAMP PENOLETON
GENERAL DEVELOPMENT MAP 24D
DATE: DECEMBER 1987
800 FEET
FIGURE 2-6
-------
^^HO"- BT KLEWFELDER
SURFACE SOI SAUPIE BY IT CORPORATION (I9SU)
BOREMOU LOCATION BY IT CORPORATION (1993)
" ---- ---- * tew«n..wl» ^Dl l| LAXtrUNAl
1M3) *TH BORING MM6ER IN PARENTHESES
APPROXIMATE GRCUNOWATER FLOW
DRECTION
SURFACE-WATER FLOW DIRECTION
EXCAVATION AREA ESTWATED BASED ON
ANAlYHCAl RESUHS AND SURFACE FEATURES.
DASHED WHERE NO SAMPLES WERE COLLECTED
^£tik£S^
/-
-03/
JtDS8002
TOPOCHAPMC "TfRF ffiPf
MARK* CORPS BASE CAMP PENDtETON GENERAL
DEVELOPMENT MAPS 5B/6A. DATE: DECEMBER 1987
SOURCE:
MARINE CORPS BASE. CAMP PENOtETOM. CALIFORNIA
REMEDIAL WVESnCATtON / FEASIBILITY STUDY DRAFT Rl
REPORT FOR CROUP C SITES. CLE-101-OIF301-87-0025
CTO 0301. REVISION 0. VOLUME 1. PREPARED BY IT CORP..
PIS2MQP 9-7
-------
K'LB- 12 $ HAND AUGER BOREHOLE BY XlflNfElDER (NOv 96)
1ESSOOJ • SURFACE SOU. SAMPLE, BY IT CORP. (J9W)
KB-02 • DOREHOU: LOCATION BY IT COW. (1993)
BACKGROUND SURFACE SOI SAMPLE
BY IT CORP. (1993)
EXCAVATION AREA ESTIMATED BASED CM
ANALYTICAL ttSULTS AND SURFACE CONTOURS-
DASHED «M£RC NO SAMPLES KRE COllECTEo'
OUTSIDE AREA.
MARWE CORPS BASE CAMP P£NOIETON GENERAL
DEVaOPMEHT MAPS 58/6A. DATE DECEMBER 1987
SOURCE:
MARINE CORPS BASE. CAMP PENDLETON AIDMIA
REMEDIAL WVESTOATION / FEASIBUTY STUBY DRAFT Rt
REPORT FOR GROUP C SITES. ClE-I01-
" VOLUME
FIGURE 2-8
-------
20GWT-01<
^SV^N5\ // <•«'•; -s> $
x?n96>N.>\ / ^NV%'zsif\ s J
/y//// K>.V 2 05 i x/Ai^/ , v \\ V _.j£2>
>//,•/ *? \ x,,;,\ //I
,'//• / ", , • \\ x?w.'i( / \
•' • :'42t s
LEGEM}
TEMPORARY WELL SAMPLE LOCATION
TW
1FB-OJ • soli- BORING LOCATION (TW
INDICATES GROUNDWATER SAMPLE)
\
SURFACE-WATER FLOW DIRECTION
EXCAVATION AREA ESTIMATED BASED ON
ANALYTICAL RESULTS, HISTORICAL AERIAL AND
GEOPHYSICAL SURVEYS. AND SURFACE
CONDITIONS; DASHED WHERE NO SAMPLES
WERE COLLECTED OUTSIDE AREA.
AREAf
AREA
(acres)
EXCAVATION
DEPTH (FT)
ESTIMATED '
VOLUME (YD3)
7.5
36.300
TOPOGRAPHIC RFFFRFNrF-
MARINE CORPS BASE CAMP PENDLETON
GENERAL DEVELOPMENT MAPS 36B. 36D
AND 37A.
DATE: DECEMBER 1987
600 FEET
-------
w*'''*''\mm ''^j/p
^.A;;f-/./?/< mm.,, win
^('Jh y^
'"' i««A^*-v
^*Wi
/ • ;i:iU
-------
•^C^ ."v;
V\ V-\ -•=•.;"».• - . ••.,•.,.•
GROUNDWATER MONITORING WELL
LOCATION
ST GROUNDWATER MONITORING WELL
INSTALLED OR MONITORED DURING
SOLID WASTE ASSESSMENT TEST
SURFACE SOIL SAMPLE LOCATION
SURFACE-WATER aOW DIRECTION
ESTIMATED SHAPE OF ORIGINAL
CANYON (FROM 1963 AND 1970
AERIAL PHOTOS AND 1995 TRENCHING)
APPROXIMATE GROUNDWATER
" ~" DIRECTION
CONCENTRATIONS THAT EXCEED OR
EQUAL MCLS ARE OUTLINED IN BOLD
CONCENTRATIONS GIVEN IN MICROGRAMS
PER LITER
ANALYTES WITH CONCENTRATIONS GREATER
.^c.0? EQUAL T0 MAXIMUM CONTAMINANT
LEVELS (MCLS) DURING AT LEAST ONE
SAMPLING ROUND ARE SHOWN
J.B.D - ANALYTICAL DATA QUALIFIERS
ft bgs - FEET BELOW GROUND SURFACE
NO - NOT DETECTED
NS - NOT SAMPLED
800 FEET
TOPOGRAPHIC
MARINE CORPS BASE CAMP PENDLETON
GENERAL DEVELOPMENT MAPS 6A AND 6B
DATE: DECEMBER 1987
FIGURE 2-11
SITE 7 - BOX CANYON LANDFILL
IFMU * i-l-n r»»r>lr- •^.^.^.^.
-------
VEGETATION
TOP SOIL
MINIMALLY COMPACTED
SELECT FILL
COMPACTED SELECT FILL
(1x10-scm/s)
REMEDIATION
WASTE
FIGURE 2-12
EVAPOTRANSPIRATION
COVER SYSTEM PROFILE
MCB CAMP PENDLETON, CAUFORMA
PREPARED FOR
SOUTHWEST DIVISION
NAVAL FACIUTES ENGJNEERMG COMMAND
CONTRACT NO. NM7«-BS-D-82»e
CUE-IOKHF3Q1-82-0009
INTERNATIONAL
TECHKOLOGY
CORPORATION
-------
v\5!?.^ j xvj ' '
C> — —^-Ctea'ti
^ ;*..\I*. \\L*. ;lu • t "^ 1
•Ml &mm
160-01 •
ND
isszm
SOU. BORIHG IQCMVM
SURFACC-WATER fLOVf DIRECTION
APPROXIMATE BOUNDARY OF
REFUSE BURNING GROUND
NOT DETECTED
LESS THAN 1.0
COMPOUNO
ARSENIC
8ERYUIUM
LEAD
£gg
0.38
0.14
130
SACKGRODMn
16
1+2
U.7
MQTgS:
CONCENTRATIONS GIVEN IN MILLIGRAMS PER KILOGRAM
(mg/kq).
CONCENTRATIONS EXCEEDING PRGs ARE SHADED.
ALL DETECTED ORGANICS ARE SHOWN IN THE FIGURE-
ONLY INORGANICS EXCEEDING PRGs OR WITH HOs y 0
ARE SHOWN.
N0
jHUWN.
DETECTIONS OR NO
ABOVE PRGs ARE NOT
FOR EACH SAMPLE. LOCATION. ECOLOGICAL HAZARD
QUOTIENTS (HOs) il.O ARE GIVEN FOR THE MAXIMUM
DETECTED CONCENTRATIONS FOR PLANTS (P)
TERRESTRIAL INVERTEBRATES (I). BIRDS (B) OR
MAMMALS (M).
TOPOGRAPHIC
MARINE CORPS BASE CAMP PENOLETON
GENERAL DEVELOPMENT MAPS 24A AND 24B
DATE: DECEMBER 1987
FIGURE 2-13
SITE IB - REFUSE BURNING GROUND IN
-------
N ; \ ^^y':'"- / ^-^ /
-^
/Jill!/?- O-VM
y)/v-V / I//'/-
/fl /' ,: / I////),
LECENH
1C8-02 • SOIL BORING LOCATION
SURFACE-WATER FLOW DIRECTION
'"""X
, ^ APPROXIMATE BOUNDARY OF REFUSE
\ J BURNING GROUND
NOT DETECTED
EfiC BACKGRQUS1P
0.14 1.42
t. CONCENTRATIONS OVEN IN MILLIGRAMS PER KILOGRAM
(mg/kg).
2- CONCENTRATIONS EXCEEDING PRGs ARE SHADED.
3 itfcUirP*0 W^N'CS ARE SHOWN IN THE FIGURE: ONLY
INORGANICS EXCEEDING PRGs ARE SHOWN.
*• OEPTM INTERVALS WITH NO ORGANIC DETECTIONS OR NO
INORGANIC CONCENTRATIONS EXCEEDING PRGs ARE NOT
SHOWN.
TOPOGRAPHIC REFERENCF;
MARINE CORPS BASE CAMP PENDLETON
GENERAL DEVELOPMENT MAPS 24A AND 24C
DATE: DECEMBER 1987
SCALE
ao*
200
400 FEET
FIGURE 2-14
SITE 1C - REFUSE BURNING GROUND
-------
I;.
-------
rnuoniiun / /. •> ~ LUFT FIELD MANUAL
COMPOUND fmg/KsJ £85 SACKCBniiMn CUIDANCF CBITFPIA
8ERYULIUM O.t4 142 MA
130 21.7
DIESEL NA NA inn
1. CONCENTRATIONS GIVEN IN MILLIGRAMS PER KILOGRAM.
2.
FIGURE 2-16
-------
NOTES;
1. tSOIL CONCENTRATIONS GIVEN IN MILLIGRAMS PER
KILOGRAM (mg/Vg). CROUNOWAIER CONCENTRATIONS
GIVEN IN UICROCRAMS PER IITER "
2. CONCENTRATIONS EXCEEDING
PRCs ARE SHADED.
3. ONLY INORGANICS EXCEEDING PRO OR HAVING HQs
T.O ARE SHOWN.
4. DEPTH INTERVALS WITH NO INORGANIC
CONCENTRATIONS EXCEEDING PRO* ARE NOT SHOWN.
5. FOR EACH SAUPLE LOCATION. ECOLOGICAL HAZARD
QUOTIENTS (HQs) 21.0 ARE GIVEN FOR MAXIMUM
DETECTED CONCENTRATIONS FOR PLANTS (P),
TERRESTRIAL INVERTEBRATES (I). BIROS (B). OR "
MAMMALS (M).
SOIL
COMPQUNO (mq/kyl ES2 BACKGROUND
ALUMINUM 77.000 40.000
ANTIMONV
ARSENIC
BERYLLIUM
CADMIUM
COLBALT
COPPER
LEAD
IRON
VANADIUM
31
0.38
0.14
9
NA
2.800
130
NA
540
GROUNDWATER
COMPOUND tea/l) ESC
ARSENIC SO
B.B
4.26
1.2
1.6
9.B5
27.9
15.1
37.000
102
MCL
0.045
TW
1FGWT-01H TEMPORARY WELL SAMPLE LOCATION
208-01 • • SOIL BORING LOCATION
— SURFACE-WATER FLOW DIRECTION
-v APPROXIMATE BOUNDARY OF REFUSE
BURNING GROUND AND GREASE
-------
LECENQ
SOIL BORING LOCATION
SURFACE-WATER aOW DIRECTION
APPROXIMATE BOUNDARY OF REFUS
BURNING GROUND OR GREASE
DISPOSAL PIT
NOT DETECTED
NOT ANALYZED
LESS THAN 1.O
1. CONCENTRATIONS OVEN IN MILLIGRAMS PER KILOGRAM
(mg/ltg).
CONCENTRATIONS EXCEEDING PRCa ARE SHADED.
ALL DETECTED OROANICS ARE SHOWN IN THE FIGURE-
OJ^YINORGANICS EXCEEDING PRO, OR WITH HQS yT.b
- m N0 AGAMIC DETECTIONS OR
INORGANIC CONCENTRATIONS EXCEEDING PRO ARE
NOT SHOWN.
5. FOR EACH SAMPLE LOCATION. ECOLOGICAL HA2ARO
QUOTIENTS (HOs) jl.O ARE GIVEN FOR THE MAXIMUM
DETECTED CONCENTRATION FOR PLANTS (P)
TERRESTRIAL INVERTEBRATES (I). BIRDS (B)' OR
MAMMALS (M).
TQPQCRAPH1C REFERENCF-
MARINE CORPS BASE CAMP PENDLETON
GENERAL DEVELOPMENT MAPS 570. SBC 67A
AND 668. DATE: DECEMBER 1987
200 FEET
FIGURE 2-18
-------
^ A_.
MARINE CORPS TAC^CAL SYSTEM
SUPPORT ACTIVITY (W;C.T.S.S A )
4 x CULT'VATION
\ \\:
\
\\
LECINJi
2GB-03 • SOIL BORING LOCATION
2GSSOOI • SURFACE SOIL SAMPLE LOCATION
JO
2GGWT/-01* TEMPORARY WELL SAMPLE LOCATION
^ SURFACE-WATER FLOW DIRECTION
f "S APPROXIMATE BOUNDARY OF GREASE
V, S DISPOSAL PIT
NO NOT DETECTED
LESS THAN 1.0
NA NOT APPLICABLE
BACKGROUND TAP-WATER
una/kajt (ma/fal PRO foq/rt MCL f/^/n
ARSENIC 0.38 2.67 004S sn
BERYUIUM 0.14 152 NA N$
BORON 5,900 NA SJ NA
NA 31,400 NA NA
23,000 67.4 NA NA
'' SOLCONCENTRATIONS GIVEN IN MILLIGRAMS PER
G.VEN
2. CONCENTRATIONS EXCEEDING PRGs ARE SHADED.
, ORGANICS ARE SHOWN IN THE FIGURE-
ARE SHOWN EXCEEDING PRGs OR HAVING HO, ko
DEPTH INTERVALS WITH NO ORGANIC DETECTIONS AND NO
VKVHMMC CONCENTRATIONS EXCEEDING PRO, ARE NOT
LOCATION- ECOLOGICAL HAZARD
-n™ (HQll) i1'° ARE GIVEN FOR ™E MAXIMUM
DETECTED CONCENTRATION FOR PLANTS (P) TERRESTRIAL
INVERTEBRATES (I). BIRDS (8). OR MAMMALS £pS"*AL
JQPOGRAPHIp REFFRFNfT-
MARINE CORPS BASE CAMP PENDLETON
GENERAL DEVELOPMENT MAPS 5C AND 9A
DATE: DECEMBER 1987
FIGURE 2-19
SITE 20 - GREASE DISPOSAL PIT
-------
10SP001
108-04
10W-02
1080-01
NO
o
H
LEGEND
SOIL PILE SAMPLE LOCATION
SOIL BORING LOCATION (H INDICATES
HAND-AUGER SAMPLE) AND/OR SURFACE
SOIL SAMPLE
MONITORING WELL LOCATION
BACKGROUND SURFACE SOIL SAMPLE
SURFACF-WATER FLOW DIRECTION
NOT DETECTED
, SOIL
•-J COMPOUND (mg/lcg)
ANTIMONY
I ARSENIC
BERYLLIUM
MANGANESE
-x I LEAD-
-i-Cl j 2.4-DINITROTOLUENE
. | DIESEL
Y-WROSO-DI-N-PROPYLAMINE 0.022
:PENTACHLOROPH£NOL 2.S
BENZO(o)PYRENE 0.061
LUFT FIELD MANUAL
E8C BACKGROUND GUIDANCE CRITFB[»
3t 8.38 NA
0.38 4.25 NA
0.14 1.42 NA
3.200 655 NA
130 21.7 NA
0.6S NA NA
NA NA 100
NA . NA
NA NA
NA NA
CROUNDWATER
COMPOUND to/l) MCL TAP-WATfB Pan
ARSENIC SO 0.045
BERYLLIUM 4 0.016
BENZOIC ACID - 150.000 '
BIS(2-ETHYLH£XYL)PHTHALATF 4 48
BUTYlBENZYLPHTHALAIt - 7.300
DIETHYLPHTHALATE - 29000
SQJES;
1. SOIL CONCENTRATIONS CIVfIN IN MILLIGRAMS PER KILOGRAM
CROUNOWATER CONCENTRATIONS ARE GIVEN IN
MICROCRAMS PER LITER.
2. CONCENTRATIONS EXCEEDING PRGs ARE SHADED- DIESEL
CONCENTRATIONS EXCEEDING IW IUFT FIELD MANUAL
GUIDANCE ARE ARE OUTLINED IN BOLD.
3 ALL DETECTED ORGANICS ARF SHOWN IN TlIF FIGURE- ONLY
INORGANICS EXCEEDING PRC& ARf SHOWN.
4. DEPTH INTERVALS WITH NO DETECTS EXCKEDINC PRGs ARE
NOT SHOWN.
TOPOGRAPHIC REFERFNCFS,;
MARINE CORPS BASE CAMP PENOtFrON GENERAL
DEVELOPMENT MAPS JOB AND 2JD DATE. DECEMBER 1987
FIGURE 2-20
SITE 10 - 26 AREA SEWAGE SLUDGE
-------
10SP001
10B-04
10W-02
10BC-01
NO
lECEHQ
SOI PILE SAMPLE LOCATION
SOIL BOR1NC "CATION (H INDICATES
HAND-AUGER SAMPLE)
MONITORING WELL LOCATION
BACKGROUND SURFACE SOIL SAMPLE
NOT DETECTED
LESS THAN 1.0
I- FOR EACH SAMPLE LOCATION. CONCENTRATIONS ARE
GIVEN IN MILLIGRAMS PER KILOGRAM FOR INORGANIC
ANALYTES AND IN UICROCRAMS PER KILOCHAM FOR
ORGANIC ANALYIES.
2.
HAZARD QUOTIENTS HQS 5l.O ARE OVEN FOR PLANTS
(P). TERRESTRIAL INVERTEBRATES (I). BIROS (B) OR
MAUMALS (M).
TQPOCRAPHIC
MARINE CORPS BASE CAMP PENO'uETON GENERAL
DEVELOPMENT MAPS 308 AND 2 JO. DA It: DECEMHLR 1987
300 FF.ET
FIGURE 2-21
SITE tO - 26 AREA SEWAGE SLUDGE
COMPOSTING YARD
-------
LEfi£Nj}
•f'.wnnt A SURFACE-WATER SAMPU LOCAI10N. SAMPl
.COLLECTED DURING 3/94 AND 2/95 NO
WATER PRESENT IN 11/94
I6SW003 4 SURFACE-WATER SAMPLE LOCATION. SAMPL
COLLECTED DURING 3/94, 11/94. AND 2/95
I6SW005 A ^"FACE-WATER SAMPLE LOCATION. SAMPLE
• COLLECTED DURING 3/94 NO WATER PRESE
Ct-
•1. .
IN 11/94 AND 2/95.
O 16SD002* _
w PHASE 2 SEDIMENT SAMPLE LOCATION
— -. 16B-04 HH
. HAND-AUGER SOIL BORING LOCATION
16B-04-RE PHASE 2 SURFACE SOIL SAMPLE COLLECTED
AT SPECIFIED SAMPLING LOCATION
16BG-01 A
BACKGROUND SURFACE SOIL SAMPLE
ASSESSMENT REFERENCE
SAMPLE
REFSD002-E<
NO
SURFACE-WATER FLOW DIRECTION
NOT DETECTED
COMPOUND (pig/fa)
ARSENIC
BERYLLIUM
DIESEL
LEAD
LUFT MANUAL
GUIDANCE
PRC BACKKRflllNrj CRITERIA
0.38 4.25 NA
0.14 1.42 NA
NA NA 100
130 21.7 NA
tffiES;
1. CONCENTRATIONS GIVEN IN MILLIGRAMS PER KILOGRAM.
2' ^^H2ATIONS EXCEEDING PRG« ARE SHADED; DIESEL
CONCENTRATIONS EXCEEDING THE LUFT FIELD MANUAI
GUIDANCE ARE OUTLINED IN BOLD MANUAL
3. ALL DETECTED ORGANICS ARE SHOWN IN THE FIGURE-
ONLY INORGANICS EXCEEDING PRGs ARE SHOWN
4. DEPTH INTERVALS WITH NO ORGANIC DETECTS OR NO
INORGANIC CONCENTRATIONS EXCEEDING PRGS ARE NOT
SHOWN.
FIGURE 2-22
SITE 18 - 22 AREA BUILDINGS 22161
AND 22187
AMD
-------
VANDF.GRIFT BLVB.
1650002 fr
168-04 •
leswoofl
16B-05 -:
16B-05-RE
B-
16^-04-RE
16BC-01W
R£FSW002-E(J)
REFS6002-E
BARIUM
BERYLLIUM
CADMIUM
CHROMIUM
COPPER
IRON
LEAD
ZINC
LECEMO
SURFACE-WATER SAMPLE LOCAIION.
SAMPLES COLLECTED DURING 3/34
AND 2/95. NO WATER PRESENT M 11/94. |
SURFACE-WATER SAMPLE LOCATION.
SAMPLES COLLECTED DURING 3/9*.
11/94, AND 2/95.
SURFACE-WATER SAMPLE LOCATION.
SAMPLES COLLECTED DURING 3/94.
NO WATER PRESENT IN 11/94 AND 2/95.
SEDIMENT SAMPLE LOCATION
HANO-AUCER SOIL BORING LOCATION
QUALITY CONTROL (DUPLICATE) SOIL
SAMPLE COLLECTED AT SPECIFIED
SAMPLING LOCATION
PHASE 2 SOIL SAMPLE COLLECTED AT
SPECIFIED SAMPLING LOCATION
BACKGROUND SURFACE SOIL SAMPLE
ECOLOGICAL RISK ASSESSMENT
REFERENCE SURFACE-WATER SAMPLE
ECOLOGICAL RISK ASSESSMENT
REFERENCE SEDIMENT SAMPLE
-: •"- SURFACE-WATER FLOW DIRECTION
SOIL BACKGROUND
CONCENTRATION
262
1.52
I.S8
33
26.B
26.459
29.1
111
FOR EACH SAMPLE LOCATION. ANALYTE
CONCENTRATION GIVEN IN MILLIGRAMS PER KILOGRAM
(mg/fcg) HAZARD QUOTIENT J1.0 ARE GIVEN FOR
PLANTS (P). TERRESTRIAL INVERTEBRATES (I)
BIRDS (8). OR MAMMALS (M). -
2. SHADING INDICATES THAT CONCENTRATIONS EXCEED
BACKGROUND FOR THE SANTA MARGARITA BASIN.
3. SURFACE-WATER CONCENTRATIONS GIVEN IN
MIC^OGRAMS PER LITER 0*g/l); SEDIMENT
CONCENTRATIONS GIVEN IN MILLIGRAMS PER KILOGRAM
(mj/kg) FOR INORGANICS AND IN MICROGRAMS PER
KILOGRAM &*g/Vg) FOR ORGANICS.
FIGURE 2-23
SITE fa - 22 AREA BUILDINGS 22151 AND
22187 DITCH CONFLUENCE AND DITCH
SUMMARY OF SOIL. SEDIMENT. AND SURFACE-
-------
t7SJW)01 A SURFACE-WATER SAMPLE LOCATION
SAMPLES COLLECTED DURING
1 MARCH 1994 AND FEB. 1995.
I7SW004 © SURFACE-WATER SAMPLE LOCATION
SAMPLE COLLECTED DURING FEB
, 199S. NO WATER PRESENT IN MARCH 1994
17S0002 # PHASE 2 SEDIMENT SAMPLE LOCATION
H
17B-07
17BG-01<
SOIL BORING LOCATION (H INDICATES
HAND-AUGER SAMPLE)
BACKGROUND SURFACE SOIL
>•"*-- SURFACE-WATER aow DIRECTION
CONC. CONCENTRATION
HO HAZARD QUOTIENT
ND NOT DETECTED
NA NOT AVAILABLE
SUftFACE-WATER
INORGANICS (fig/1) RLE
! BARIUM 39
SILVER o.12
ISEDIMENT
INORGANICS (nxj/k?) RLE
BARIUM 2.0
; CADMIUM 1.2
SEDIMENT
OHGAN1CS (tia/kg) Pir
^.V-DOE 2.2
'4.4--DDT 1.6
BACKGROUND
NA
NA
BACKGROUND
262
1.6
BACKGROUND
NA
NA
NQlfc
!
SURFACErWATER CONCENTRATIONS OVEN IN
A
PER KILOGRAM (pgAg) FOR ORGANICS.
AND
TOPOGRAPHIC
MARINE CORPS BASE CAMP PENDLETON GENERAL
DEVELOPMENT MAP 16C. DATE: DECEMBER 1987
400 FEET
FIGURE 2-24
SITE 17 - 22 AREA BUILDING 22187
MARSH AND CHTCH
SUMMARY OF SURFACE-WATER AND
-------
^T'^OI
-,../?-AV
-> • -// / /
Y /•; . •->, I
•>-^^^\, \w\S jgt- - si -
- -" - --.-.\> -. V\'U \'v." i V.'~. *-.:••
188-031
18S801 B
18MW-011
LEGEND
SOIL BORING LOCATION (H INDICATES
HAND-AUGER SAMPLE)
SOIL BORING LOCATION SAMPLED
DURING BECHTEL NATIONAL. INC.
1996 INVESTIGATION
ATTEMPTED WELL BORING LOCATION
DRILLED AND SAMPLED DURING BECHTEL
NATIONAL. INC.. 1996 INVESTIGATION
(REFUSAL PREVENTED GROUNDWATER
SAMPLING)
UNLINED DRAINAGE DITCH
•- v-UNOKtlt-LINtU Oil
ND NOT DETECTED
HQs HAZARD QUOTIENTS
COUPOUNO. fmo/ka) D_Bfi
ARSENIC 0.38
BERYLLIUM 0.14
"CH
BACKGROUND
16
1.42
MDJESi
1. CONCENTRATIONS GIVEN IN MILLIGRAMS PER KILOGRAM
(mg/kg).
2. CONCENTRATIONS ABOVE PRCs ARE SHADED.
3. ALL DETECTED ORCANICS ARE SHOWN IN THE FIGURE-
ONLY INORGANICS EXCEEDING PRG* OR HQs y.Q ARE
SHOWN.
4- DEPTH INTERVALS WITH NO ORGANIC DETECTIONS OR
NO INORGANIC CONCENTRATIONS EXCEEDING PRGa OR
WITH HAZARD QUOTIENTS 21.0 ARE NOT SHOWN.
• FOR EACH SAMPLE LOCATION. HAZARD QUOTIENTS i
ARE GIVEN FOR PLANTS(P). TERRESTRIAL
INVERTEBRATES(I). BIRDS(B). OR MAMMALS(M).
TOPOGRAPHIC REFERFNPF-
MARINE CORPS BASE CAMP PENDLETON
GENERAL DEVELOPMENT MAPS 24A AND T/C
DATE: DECEMBER 1987
3.0
500 FEfT
FIGURE 2-25
-------
*
f M\ \ \ 3™1*
&r\ \ .'."\ 'I/',
PHASE 1 SURFACE-WATER SAMPLE
LOCATIONS. SAMPLES COUECTEO DURING
12/9J, 11/94. AND 2/95.
PHASE 2 SURFACE-WATER SAMPLE
COLLECTED AT SPECIFIED SAMPLING
-Y"i'9T *6 Ifc-^'t '•' '• *M,,
.. n\v V*^^'-N\>VI
PHASE 2 SURFACE-WATER SAMPLE
LOCATION. SAMPLE COLLECTED DURING
6/96.
PHASE 1 SEDIMENT SAMPLE LOCATION.
PHASE 2 SEDIMENT SAMPLE COLLECTED
AT SPECIFIED SAMPLING LOCATION
PHASE 2 SEDIMENT SAMPLE LOCATION.
SURFACE-WATER FLOW DIRECTION
DIRECTION*^ GROUNOWATER FLOW
HAZARD QUOTIENT
NOT APPLICABLE
NOT DETECTED
BARIUM
CAOMUU
COPPER
LEAD
UANQANCSE
siata
ZMC
AROaOR-1260
M'-OOO
4.V-DOE
«.4'-MT
ALUUWUU
BAKUH
CHIOWJC
CTANIOE
mow
UANCANCSC
MCROIRT
SH.VER
MOJE:
SURFACE-WATER CONCENTRATIONS OVEN IN MICROCflAMS
i; SEWMENT CONCENTRATIONS GIVEN IN
KILOGRAM (mg/kg) FOR INORGANICS
PER KILOGRAM (ua/Va\ FOR ORGANICS.
FIGURE 2-26
SITE 27 - 22 AREA DITCHES
aeuiun ni HI nidirs
-------
L£££ND_
MB-OIB ^BOR^LOCATON (H INDICATES
J2MW-01B ATTEMPTED WELL BORING LOCATION
DRILLED AND SAMPIED DURING
BECHTEL NATIONAL. INC.. 1996
INVESTIGATION
I04CP61* HYDROPUNCH GROUNDWATER
LOCATION SAMPLED DURING
BECHTEL NATIONAL. INC.. 1995
INVESTIGATION
,n^^n«M . SURFACE SOIL LOCATION SAMPLED
104CP02 • DURING BECHTEL NATIONAL. INC
1995 INVESTIGATION
•" SURFACE-WATER FLOW DIRECTION
ND
COMPOUND
ARSENIC
BERYLLIUM
CHROMIUM VI
NOT DETECTED
PRQ
O.J8
0.1*
0.2
BACKGROHMQ
2.67
1.52
NA
1. SOIL CONCENTRATIONS GIVEN IN MILLIGRAMS PER
KILOGRAM (mg/kg). CROUNDWATER CONCENTRAHONS
GIVEN IN MICROGRAMS PER LITER
2. CONCENTRATIONS EXCEEDING PRCs ARF SHADED.
ORGANICS A"E SHOWN IN THE FIGURE;
108 EXCEEDINC PRGs OR HAVING HQs >
. ARE SHOWN.
*' S2"-,SEP1H INTERVALS W"1 NO ORGANIC DETECTIONS
«rN2nT?'GANIC CONCENTRATIONS EXCEEDING PRGs
AKL NOl SHOWN.
5. FOR EACH SAMPLE LOCATION. HAZARD QUOTIENTS >1 n
ARE GIVEN FOR PLANTS(P). 1ERRES TRIAL
INVERTEBRATES(I), BIRDS(B). OR MAMMALS(M).
TOPOGRAPHIC RFFfRFNCF-
MARINE CORPS BASE CAMP PCNDLETON
GENERAL DEVELOPMENT MAPS 130 AND 14C
DATE: DECEMBER 1937
SCALE
•a^a^Smm,
0 300 600 FEET
FIGURE 2-27
-------
J CKIS
£SBtti£j:"--: -fc
IJL: ,; ip^l .• fg 1 7ir'riBr
SOIL SORING LCTAT;ON (n INDICATES
HAND-AJJGER SAMPLE)
itMPORARY WELL GRCUNDVWJEW
SAMPLE IOCA7ICN
MONITORING Wtl.1 lOCAUON DRILLED
AND SAMPLED DURING BECHTEL
NAriOMAI... INC.. 149S ;NVEST1GATIOM
SU'" UT»R
2. CftMC£NTBA110NS EXCStDlMO PRSs ARF SHADED; D.-?'. DEP'H IN'fRVALS WTH MO ORCANif. DETTCPCNS OR NO
INORGANIC CONCENTRATIOMS EXCEEDING PRCs ARE NO'!
5HCMWJ.
HIC RE»;r
-------
. 348-091
34GWT-011
SOIL BORING LOCATION (H INDICATES
HAND-AUGER SAMPLE)
TEMPORARY WELL GROUNDWATER
SAMPLE LOCATION
MONITORING WELL LOCATION
SURFACE-WATER FLOW DIRECTION
COMPOUND frnq/kg)
ALUMINUM
ARSENIC
BARIUM
BORON
CHROMIUM
IRON
MOLYBDENUM
NICKEL
BACKGROUND
20.999
4.6
262
33.0
26.459
7.4
22.5
NOTE:
1. FOR EACH SAMPLE-LOCATION. HAZARD QUOTIENTS
(HQs) £1.0 ARE GIVEN FOR PLANTS (P)
TERRESTRIAL INVERTEBRATES (l). BIRDS (B) OR
MAMMALS (M).
TOPOGRAPHIC REFERENCE:
MARINE CORPS BASE CAMP PENDLETON
GENERAL DEVELOPMENT MAP 57D
DATE: DECEMBER 1987
400 FEE i
FIGURE 2-29
SITE 34 - COMBAT ENGINEERS MAINTENANCE
FACIIITY. BIJ11DINRS fl?5BO - B25B3
-------
J5B-05 • BOREHOLE LOCATION
358-02 • BACKGROUND BORFHOLE LOCATION
35HP-01 • HYDROPUNCH CROUNDWATER SAMPLE
LOCATION
HQ LESS THAN 1.0
• •*» SURFACE-WATER FLOW DIRECTION
»». SURFACE-WATER FLOW DIRECTION
^^ (EPHEMERAL)
NA
ND
NOT APPLICABLE
NOT DETECTED
SOIL INORGANICS
ARSENIC
BERYLLIUM
CHROMIUM
MANGANESE
SOIL ORGANIC
PRG
0.38
0.14
0.2
380
ERG
61
BENZO(o}PYRENE
GROUNOWATER
COMPOUNDS faq/Q Pfifi MCI
ALUMINUM 37,000 1.000
BARIUM 2.600 t.OOO
CADMIUM 13 5
CHROMIUM 0.16 50
LEAD 4 50
MANGANESE 180 NA
MOLYBDENUM 180 NA
NICKEL 730 100
VANADIUM 260 NA
BENZENE 0.39 i
£IWS(2-ETHYLHEXYL)PHTHALATE 4.8 4
BACKGROUND
0.68
1.6
169
276
BACKGROUND
NA
BACKGROUND
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NOTES;
INORGANIC CONCENTRATIONS IN SOIL GIVEN IN
MILLIGRAMS PER KILOGRAM (mgAg) ORGAN r
SOIL ^
...—-. ... „„... „,.,_„ „, mi^nuuiXAMS PER i
GIVEN ¥'OM/li CONCENTRATIONS IN GROUNDWAIL«|
CONCENTRATIONS OUTLINED IN BOLD FXCELD PRCs.
SOIL DEPTH INTERVALS WITH NO DETECTS EXCEEDING
PRGs.OR NO HAZARD QUOTIENTS 21.0 ARE NOT SHOWN
4. CROUNDWATER ANALYTFS WITH CONCENTRATIONS
EXCEEDING PRGs ARF SHOWN,
5. HAZARD QU01LNTS i.1.0 ARE GIVFN FOR RANIS (P)
TERRESTRIAL INVf RTEBRAUS (I). BIRDS (B). OR
MAMMALS \Wy.
FIGURE 2-30
-------
TO
BASILONE
ROAD
,, "^LASS/DEBRIS
•' •'' . PILE
SEWAGE TREATMENT
PLANT #11
PONDS
CHLORINE
GAS HOUSE
PREVIOUS SOIL SAMPLE LOCATION
DRILLED AND SAMPLED DURING RCRA
FACILITY ASSESSMENT; SITE 207
BORING 2
GLASS/DEBRIS PILE
100 FEET
GENERAL DEVELOPMENT MAP 490 (48)
FIGURE 2-31
SITE 38
DEBRIS PILE AREA BEHIND PONDS AT
SEWAGE TREATMENT PLANT 11
SUMMARY OF SOIL ANALYTICAL RESULTS
• MCB CAMP PENDLETON, CAUFORMA
PREPARED FOR
NAVAL FACILITIES
ENGINEERING SERVICE CENTER
CONTRACT NO. N47406-82-D-30546
INTERNATIONAL
TECHNOLOGY
CORPORATION
-------
SAN CLEMENII RANCH
(61 ARFA)
37SS001 ft SURFACE SOIL SAMPLE LOCATION
SV255B2 D
37B-01 B SOIL BORING LOCATION
J7CWT-01
J7MW-01® MONITORING WELL LOCATION DR.iLF.O AND
« LOCA1l°N DRILLED
A«rcnr °URINC RCRA "CH
ASSESSMENT,' SITE 255. BORING 2
CONCRETE SLAB
PETROLEUM, OIL. ANO LUBRICANT
NOT DETECTED
ARSENIC
6ERUIIOM
*.4'-W)£
.4.4'-DDT
TOXAPHENC
•ROTECTIVE CLOTHING
CHANCE ROOM
FORMER DISCHARGE MANHOLE
CONCENTRATIONS EXCEEDING PRCt ARF SHADED.
•"ARM BlDCS
FIGURE 2-32
E.2l .-.PESTICIDE;^ AND POL-
-------
I
O)
C>J
IT
<2
ce 3
a z
>*
5M
FIRE STATION
SV262B2
,-ANALYTE-
Artenic
x DEPTH (feet)
h 1
4.2
5
NO
10
3.7
SV262B2
SV262B1
SV262B1
ANALYTE
Arsenic
DEPTH ^feeti
1
ND
5
ND
10
ND
15
4.5
SV262B2
LEGEND
PREVIOUS RFA SOIL BORING
DRILLED AND SAMPLED DURING RCRA
FACILITY ASSESSMENT; SITE 262
BORING 2
300 FEET
RgfERENCF;
GENERAL DEVELOPMENT MAP 49D (4D.E)
FIGURE 2-33
SITE 38
52 AREA SEWER LINE, BUILDING 52188
SUMMARY OF SOIL ANALYTICAL RESULTS
MOB CAMP PENDLETON. CAUFORNIA
PREPARED FOR
NAVAL FACILITIES
ENGINEERING SERVICE CENTER
CONTRACT NO. N474O8-82-0-3056
INTERNATIONAL
TECHNOLOGY
CORPORATION
-------
O)
CM
m
IP,
I§V263i|
ANALYTE
Araenie
n_2 1
ntrr
"WrT
NO
HTCT
•NO j
13-15
SV26382
X
: SOIL CONCENTRATIONS GIVEN IN
MILLIGRAMS PER KILOGRAMS
LEGENQ
D RF* SOIL BORING
SV263B1 DRILLED AND SAMPLED DURING RCRA
FIGURE 2-34
SITE 39
41 AREA SEWER LINE,
BUILDINGS 41300 AND
CAMP
sULTS
CAUFORMA
200 FEET
GENERAL DEVELOPMENT MAP 14C (3A)
PREPARED FOR
NAVAL FACB.ITIES
ENGINEERING SERVICE CENTER
CONTRACT NO. N474O8-82-O-306«
INTERNATIOHAL
TECHNOLOGY
CORPORATION
-------
FIGURE 2-35
Akin 40 . is APPA SEWER LINES
-------
/
40B-01 • SOIL BORING LOCATION
_ PREVIOUS RFA SOIL BORING LOCATION
,. SV264B2 D DRILLED AND SAMPLED DURING RCRA
FACILITY ASSESSMENT; SITE 264,
BORING 2
NO
NOT DETECTED
COMPOUND
PRG BACKGROUND
ARSENIC
BERYLLIUM
0.38
0.14
16
1.42
NOTES:
1. CONCENTRATIONS OVEN IN MILLIGRAMS PER KILOGRAM
2. CONCENTRATIONS EXCEEDING PRGs ARE SHADED.
3. ONLY INORGANICS EXCEEDING PRGs ARE SHOWN IN
THE FIGURE.
4. DEPTH INTERVALS WITH NO ORGANIC DETECTIONS OR
NO INORGANIC CONCENTRATIONS EXCEEDING PRCs
ARE NOT SHOWN. WITH THE EXCEPTION OF ARSENIC.
TOPOGRAPHIC REFERENCE:
MARINE CORPS BASE CAMP PENDLETON
GENERAL DEVELOPMENT MAPS 24A AND 24C.
DATE: DECMBER 1987
300 FEET
-------
-------
3.0
Responsiveness Summary
As
« Seeuon 2.2,
kave been leased .o ft. public aad arc taw., in „„ Administrative
' " dOC
Rccori ava
P ,
s^ f ? St
shed ,„ .oca! newspape*.
WWCh " mataai-d « *• AOS^S offices a,
Sa" D"B°- NMic« "—«» were
notices rfp-fc ^^ ^ ^
, a respom.veness summary is not requi
sues. co«n in accordance «i
of the
«f<»
. as amended by SARA and to the
3-1
-------
(intentionally blank)
SCjy9-9t/WPOPaidlete^OI>9-28.wpd 3-2
-------
4.0 References
Cal/EPA, see California Environmental Protection Agency.
2=±=t=r5^te^£sa^ari^
<1992b' *W*»««rf GW*w» Jfer Human Health
Department of Toxic Substances Control, January.
CaUfomia OccupadonalSafety and Health Administration, 1979, Cal/OSHA Guide for the
Construct™ Industry, Department of Industrial Relations, August
™
ubv »W nttrgnHrtn* Tonks
issued by the Leafang Underground Fuel Tank Task Force, October.
Cal/OSHA, see California Occupational Safety and Health Administration.
c^p"^
EPA, see U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.
StatiStiCO! Method5for *«™~** Pollution Monitoring. Van Norstrand
Tr, **>** ******** of the Chemical Characteristics of Natural Water
., U.S. Geologlcal Survey Water-Supply Paper 2254, U.S. Government WatiS'
"Marine Corps Base Camp Pendleton, California,
Masterplan, Volumes 1 and 2, Draft, prepared for Southwest Division Naval Facilities
Engineering Command, August
!? '^K-> ^ "^ ^^^^ Evaluation/Cost Analysis for Sites ID/1003, IE/1004
and 35 Marme Corps Base Camp Pendleton, California," prepared for Southwest D vision
Naval Facilities Engineering Command, 18 March. "vision
NEESA, see Naval Energy and Environmental Support Activity.
4-1
-------
SCW-98/WPOPeodle«VROD9-28.wpd
-------
* Command, 1996a, "Draft Final RI Report for
ariDe CWPS Basc
ng Group Inc., 12 November.
SI^ 1996b« "Fmal Site Assessment
Coips Base Camp Pendleton' -
lI?" ?gineerin* Command- »^a, "Final Record of Decision,
Unit 2, Marine Corps Base Camp Pendleton, California," 30 September.
T ~** Command. 1 997b- "Draft Final RI Report for
study' Marine CorPs Base
prepared by Jacobs Engineering Group Inc., 16 July.
ineering Command, 1998a, "Draft Final Remedial
^
1998c, Technics Mcmomdum.
1E' "•.-".
SWDIV, s« Southwest Division Naval Faculties Engineering Command.
-------
SWRCB, see California State Water Resources Control Board.
%E£^^
Differences, The Record of Dec^/^^t <%* <*°f?*cision' *&*•*» of Significant
of Emerenc and R
erences, The Record of Dec/t <* ' *•» o ignificant
OSWER Directive 9355.3-O^e of Emergency and Remedial Response.
^^
and Assessment Office, Cincinnati, OH, January ECAO-CIN, Environmental Criteria
U.S. Environmental Protection
9285.7-081. n maxciKjr Response, OSWER Publication
>| 4
-------
^^
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 1998a, Amendment to FFA.
4-5
-------
-------
APPENDIX A
TRANSCRIPT OF THE PUBLIC MEETING
-------
-------
A public meeting was held at the Oceanside Senior Citizens Center in Oceanside,
California on 14 May 1998 at 7:00 p.m. for the Operable Unit 3 sites. A display session
was held prior to th
-------
-------
CERTlFiED COPY
DEPOSIT
EPORTERS
EMERALD PLAZA
•J02 \Vcsi Broaduav
Suiw 1890
San Diego. C A 92101
(800)233-2595
(619)233-5533
(61 <)) 2
caldcpo ii i\ netcom com
Commencing
Location
7:00 p.m.
455 Country Club Lane
Oceanside, California 92054
Thursday, May 14, 1993
LESLIE R. JOHNSON, CSRNo. 11451
Day, Date
Reported By
CORPORATE OFFICE: Eastland Securities Building
599 S Barranca Avenue • Penthouse • Covina.CA 9172?
-------
1
2
3
4
5 Team.
6
7
8
25
26
27
28
MS. TROST: Welcome to the public meeting for
Operable Unit Three of the Installation Restoration Program
for Camp Pendleton, California. My name is Teresa-Trost,
and I represent the Marine Corps on the Federal Facilities
For the record, will the other members of the
Federal Facilities Team state their name and affiliation.
MR. MANGOLD: Davis Mangold, the Remedial Project
9 Manager for Southwest Division.
" MS. LAOTH, Sheryl Lauth, L-a-u-t-h, Remedial Project
11 Manager from EPA.
12 ' MR' ODERMATT: John Odermatt, O-d-e-r-m-a-t-t,
13 Remedial Project Manager from the Regional Water Quality
14 Control Board.
15
16
17
18
MS. TROST: Okay. Let the record show that there is
no member of the public ln the audience and that we have
fulfilled the requirement under CERCLA for a public meeting.
And I would propose that the meeting is now closed.
19 Do I have a second?
20 MR. MANGOLD: Second.
21 MS' TROST: The meeting is now closed.
22
(The public meeting
23
concluded at 7:03 p.m.)
24
CALIFORNIA DEPOSITION REPORTERS
-------
REPORTER'S CERTIFICATE
I, LESLIE R. JOHNSON, Certified Shorthand Reporter for
the State of California, do hereby certify:
That said public meeting was taken before me at the
time and place therein stated and was thereafter transcribed
into print under my direction and supervision, and I hereby
certify the foregoing public meeting is a full, true and
correct transcript of my shorthand notes so taken.
In witness whereof I have subscribed my name this
day of -tYI'OLA 19
LESLIE R. JOHNSON 77
Certified ShorthandReporter No. 11451
for the State of California
-------
-------
APPENDIX B
APPLICABLE OR RELEVANT AND
APPROPRIATE REQUIREMENTS FOR
OU3 SITES 1 A, ID, 1E, 1F, 2A AND 7
-------
-------
Table of Contents.
List of Tables
B-Ui
v
B-l
Abbreviations/Acrbnyras B
1.0 Introduction
2.0 ARARs for the Selected Remedies for OU3 Sites 1 A, ID, IE, IF, 2A, AND 7 .. B-3
2.1 ARARs for Sites 1 A, ID, IE, IF, and 2A B_4
2.2 ARARsforSite? Bg
3.0 References B ,,
* • xj-l J
List of Tables
Table B-l
Table B-2
Applicable or Relevant and Appropriate Requirements for OU3 Sites IA,
IE, IF, and 2A
Applicable or Relevant and-Appropriate Requirements for Site 7
SCVIO-98/WPCyPewJle«o«OD«2-27ji*
B-i
-------
SCVl(WayWJ>OPet)dJeta«OD12-27.«pb
-------
Abbreviations/Acronyms.
APCD
ARAR
CAA
CAMU
ccc
CCR
CERCLA
CFR
CIWMB
DLM
DON
EE/CA
EPA
FR
MCB
MSWLF
NCP
OU
RCRA
RI
RWQCB
SIP
SWDIV
SWRCB
TBC
use
Air Pollution Control District
Applicable or Relevant and Appropriate Requirement
Clean Air Act
Corrective Action Management Unit
California Coastal Commission
California Code of Regulations
Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and
Liability Act
Code of Federal Regulations
California Integrated Waste Management Board
Designated Level Methodology
Department of the Navy
Engineering Evaluation/Cost Analysis
U.S. Environmental Protection
Federal Register
Marine Corps Base
Municipal Solid Waste Landfill
National Oil and Hazardous Substances Pollution Contingency Plan
Operable Unit
Resource Conservation and Recovery Act
Remedial Investigation
California Regional Water Quality Control Board
State Implementation Plan
Southwest Division Naval Facilities Engineering Command
California State Water Resources Control Board
To Be Considered
United States Code
SCIrtO.98WPOPendtaollOD12-27.api>
B-iii
-------
SCtflO-98/WPCypcod!eto/ROD12-27jj* B-iv
-------
1.0 Introduction.
Section 121(d) of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and
Liability Act of 1980 (CERCLA) states that remedial actions at CERCLA sites must attain
(or the decision document justify the waiver of) any Federal or more stringent State
environmental standards, requirements, criteria, or limitations that are determined to be
legally applicable or relevant and appropriate.
Applicable requirements are those cleanup standards, standards of control, and other
substantive environmental protection requirements, criteria, or limitations promulgated
under Federal or State law that specifically address the situation at a CERCLA site. The
requirement is applicable if the jurisdictional prerequisites of the standard show a direct
correspondence when objectively compared with conditions at the site. If the requirement
is not legally applicable, the requirement is evaluated to determine whether it is relevant
and! appropriate. Relevant and appropriate requirements are those cleanup standards,
standards of control, and other substantive environmental protection requirements, criteria,
or limitations promulgated under Federal or State law that, although not applicable, address
problems or situations sufficiently similar to the circumstances of the proposed response
action and are well-suited to the conditions of the site (U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency [EPA], 1988). The criteria for determining relevance and appropriateness are
listed in Title 40, Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), Section 300.400(g)(2).
To qualify as a State applicable or relevant and appropriate requirement (ARAR) under
CERCLA and the National Oil and Hazardous Substances Pollution Contingency Plan
(NCP), a State requirement must be all of the following:
A State law
An environmental or facility siting law
Promulgated (of general applicability and legally enforceable)
Substantive (not procedural or administrative)
More stringent than the Federal requirement
Identified in a timely manner
Consistently applied.
B-l
-------
In order to constitute an ARAR, a requirement must be substantive. Therefore, only
substantive provisions of requirements identified are considered ARARs. The ARARs
identified for the selected remedial action alternative for Operable Unit (OU) 3 Sites 1A
ID. IE, IF, and 2A at Marine Corps Base (MCB) Camp Pendleton are summarized in the
following sections. Table B-l andTableB-2. Table B-l provides ARARs for Sites 1A,
ID, IE, IF, and 2A. Table B-2 provides ARARs for Site 7 and includes landfill cap
ARARs originally presented in the Site 7 engineering evaluation/cost analysis (EE/CA) for
installation of a landfill cap (SWDIV, 1995), in addition to groundwater monitoring and
postclosure maintenance ARARs not previously included in the EE/CA ARARs.
Although, the cap ARARs were identified for a removal action, they are considered
complete due to the Department of the Navy's (DON's) policy to comply with EPA's
promulgated requirement that removal actions -... shall, to the extent practicable
considering the exigencies of the situation, attain applicable or relevant and appropriate
requuements under federal environmental or state environmental or facility siting laws"
(40 CFR 300.415[i]). Groundwater ARARs were not addressed in the EE/CA because the
groundwater remedial investigation (RI) was not complete. Subsequent to completion of
the EE/CA, the RI recommended no remedial action for Site 7 groundwater based on the
results of the risk assessment (SWDIV, 1996a). Groundwater monitoring ARARs for the
presumptive remedy cap and postclosure maintenance of the landfm are however, included
in Table B-2. Subsequent to the time that Site 7 ARARs were presented in the EE/CA
State Water Quality Control Board (SWQCB) landfill requirements of Title 23 California
Code of Regulations (CCR) and California Integrated Waste Management Board
(CIWMB) landfill requirements of Tide 14 have since been replaced by the combined
SWRCB/CIWMB Regulations in Title 27 CCR. Updated citations are provided in
Table B-2 in addition to the former citations.
SO/l(WS/WPQPen
-------
2.0 ARARs for the Selected Remedies for OU3
Sites 1A, 10, 1E, 1F, 2A, and 7
Remedial action for soil was selected for the following OU 3 sites at MCB Camp
Pendleton:
1 A - Refuse Burning Ground in 14 Area
ID - Refuse Burning Ground in 20 Area
IE - Refuse Burning Ground in 32 Area
IF - Refuse Burning Ground in 43 Area
2A - Grease Disposal Pit in 14 Area
7 - Box Canyon Landfill.
The same action was selected for Sites 1 A, ID, IE, IF, and 2A: soil excavation and on-
base disposal; no further action for groundwater. No further action was recommended for
groundwater at these sites during the RI(SWDIV, 1996band 1997). The risk assessment
identified no unacceptable risks from groundwater. The selected remedy involves no
treatment because the RI results indicate that contaminated soils at Sites 1A, ID, IE, IF,
and 2A would not leach to groundwater, and meet the requirements for fill at Site 7 - Box
Canyon Landfill. Based on the Designated Level Methodology (DLM) (California
Regional Water Quality Control Board [RWQCBJ, 1986), excavated soil from Sites 1 A,
ID, IE, and IF would not impact groundwater at Site 7 (SWDIV, 1998a). Soil from Site
2A exceeded the designated levels, although only slightly; therefore, the soU from Site 2A
was tested for teachability using DI WET analysis. The DI WET results were compared
against a soluble designated level predicted by the DLM. DI WET results were less than
the soluble designated levels, indicating that Site 2A soils would not pose a threat to
groundwater (SWDIV, 1998b). The identified ARARs for Sites 1 A, ID, IE, IF, and 2A
are listed in Table B-l.
The action selected for Site 7 includes installation of an evapotranspiration cap and
associated long-term monitoring. Groundwater monitoring will be conducted to measure
the effectiveness of the landfill cap, as part of the presumptive remedy, and to comply with
postclosurc maintenance requirements identified in the EE/CA. ARARs for Site 7 are
identified in this appendix and are listed in Table B-2.
B-3
-------
2.1 ARABs far Sites 1A, 1D, IE, 1F,anti2A
The Department of the Navy (DON) has dctennined that 22 CCR 66264.94 is a "relevant
and appropriate" Federal ARAR for the selected remedies for the OU3 sites. The DON
considers 22 CCR 66264.94 a federal ARAR because it was approved by the EPA in its
23 July 1992 authorization of the State of California Resource Conservation and Recovery
Act (RCRA) program and is federally enforceable (see 57 Federal Register [FR] 32727,
23 July 1992, and 55 FR 8742, 8 March 1990; see also Wyckoff v. EPA 796 F.2d 1197,
[9th Cir. 1986]).The State of California disagrees that 22 CCR 66264.94 is a "Federal"
ARAR. This regulation is a part of the State's authorized hazardous waste control
program. It is the State's position that it is a "State" ARAR and not a "Federal" ARAR.
See 55 FR 8765,8 March 1990, and U.S. v. State of Colorado, 990 F.2d 1565, (1993).
For the same reasons stated above for 22 CCR 66264.94, the DON has determined that
other specifically identified substantive requirements of Title 22 CCR approved under the
authorized State RCRA program are Federal ARARs for the selected remedies for the
OU3 sites. The State of California disagrees with finding the other substantive
requirements under the authorized State RCRA program "Federal" ARARs for the reasons
set forth above. It is the State's position that these requirements are "State" ARARs not
"Federal" ARARs.
The DON has determined that the SWRCB Resolution No. 92-49 and 27 CCR 20400
(formerly 23 CCR 2550.4) do not constitute ARARs for the selected remedies for OU3
because they are State requirements and arc not more stringent than the Federal ARAR
provisions of 22 CCR 66264.94. The NCP, as set forth in 40 CFR 300.4000;), provides
that only state standards more stringent than Federal standards may be ARARs (see also
Section 121[d][2][A][ii] of CERCLA).
The provisions of 22 CCR 66264.94 and 27 CCR 20400 (formerly 23 CCR 2550.4) that
address soil concentration limits are identical. Therefore, 27 CCR 20400 is not more
stringent than 22 CCR 66264.94 and its provisions are not ARARs. SWRCB Resolution
No. 92-49 was promulgated by the SWRCB as policies and procedures to be followed by
Regional Water Boards for oversight of investigations and cleanup and abatement orders.
It is, therefore, not of general applicability and is not an "applicable" ARAR. However, it
was evaluated as a potential "relevant and appropriate" State ARAR. Section m.G of '
SO/l(WS/WPOPen(fleta/ROD12-27.»pb B-4
-------
SWRCB Resolution 92-49 provides in relevant part that regional boards shall "...in
approving any alternative cleanup levels less stringent than background, apply
Section 2550.4... [now 27 CCR 20400]." Because this resolution incorporates and relies
upon the provisions of 23 CCR 2550.4 (now 27 CCR 20400), which arc not more stringent
than 22 CCR 66264.94, SWRCB Resolution No. 92-49 is also not more stringent and,
hence, its provisions are not State ARARs.
The State of California disagrees with the DON's assertion that SWRCB Resolution
No. 92-49 is not an ARAR and believes the resolution is an applicable requirement for the
OU3 remedial actions. It requires compliance with more than 66264.94. Resolution
No. 92-49 requires compliance with 23 CCR 2550.4, but Sections ELF and m.G also have
additional requirements that must be met. To the extent that Resolution No. 92-49
includes provisions that are the same as 22 CCR 66264.94, the State believes it is
appropriate for the DON to defer to the State's interpretation of 22 CCR 66264.94.
Despite the disagreement on whether identified ARARs are "federal" or "state," the State
has decided to exercise its discretion not to invoke dispute resolution for this Record of
Decision for the following reasons:
• The State believes excavation of soil from the OU3 sites and placement under the
landfill cover at the Site 7 CAMU is the best remedy and complies with all
substantive State requirements
• The soil from OU3 Sites 1A, ID, IE, IF, and 2A arc contaminated with metals
that, when placed under the landfill cover already approved by the State for the
Site 7 CAMU, will be protective of groundwater
• The cleanup levels for the soil at Sites 1A, ID, IE, IF, and 2A will be protective of
groundwater and comply with all substantive requirements.
The excavation, transportation, and handling of soil at the OU3 remedial action sites could
result in fugitive emissions of paniculate matter. San Diego County Air Pollution Control
District (APCD) Rule 50(d)(l) has been identified as an applicable Federal ARAR for
such emissions (Table B-l). This rule is considered a Federal ARAR because it is
included in the approved State Implementation Plan (SIP) under Section 110 of the Clean
AirAct(CAA).
SCTIO-98/WPOPo>dkto/KODI2-27.apb B-5
-------
The DON has determined that substantive provisions of 22 CCR 66262 10(a) and
66262.11 are ARARs for determination of hazardous waste. The soils at Sites 1A ID IE
IF. and 2A have been identified as hazardous waste by applying knowledge of the hazard '
characteristic of the waste in light of the materials or processes used to generate the waste,
The substantive provisions of 22 CCR 66264.13(a) and (b) are also determined to be
ARARs. The substantive provisions at 22 CCR 66264.13(a) require analysis of hazardous
waste ^before an owner or operator transfers, treats, stores, or disposes of any hazardous
waste Representative samples of the soil from the OU3 sites have been analyzed during
the RIand in a recent field sampling effort in May 1998 to further delineate the sites. This
analyse Deluded the information necessary for acceptance into the CAMU designated at
Site 7. ^ «**•*** at 22 CCR 66264.13(b) require an analysis plan. Work plans for
the RI and the additional sampling for further delineation were written to satisfy the
^bstantive provisions for analysis plans in 22 CCR 66264.13(b) and concurrence was
received from DTSC, RWQCB, and EPA. The sampling and analysis provided adequate
formation for placing the waste at the Site 7 CAMU even if it was assumed to bT
hazardous waste and therefore, no additional sampling and analysis to determine whether
the waste is hazardous was necessary.
The Department of the Navy has determined that substantive provisions of 27 CCR
20230(a) and (b) are the controlling ARARs for soil discharge levels for the Site 7 - Box
C^yonI^dmi(TableB.l).ToassessifthesoilsatSiteslA,lD,lE.lF.and2Ajt
^requirements, a two-phased screening process was conducted. The first phase
included using the designated level methodology (DIM) (California Regional Water
Quality Control Board [RWQCB], 1986). Acceptable soil concentrations are calculated
through the use of DLM equation and compared to actual soil concentrations. Soil
concentrations at Sites 1A, ID. IE, and IFmet the requirements. The soil at Site 2A did
not meet DLM criteria. Because of the conservative nature of the DLM, the second phase
of screening was applied for Site 2A and teachability analysis using DI WET was
conducted for Site 2A soils. The DI WET results were compared against a soluble
designated level predicted by the DLM. DI WET results were less than the soluble
-------
The Department of the Navy has determined that the DLM is a method for determining
acceptable contaminant concentrations in soil to meet State discharge requirements,
specifically 27 CCR 20230. However, failure of site soil to meet DLM does not indicate
noncompliance. Further testing and/or evaluation may indicate compliance.
Federal- and State-listed threatened and endangered species are present at or near remedial
action Sites 1 A, ID, 1E, IF, and 2A. The California gnatcatcher (Federal-listed
endangered species) was observed on Sites 1A, ID, and IE and is suspected at Sites IF
and 2A, where habitat had burned prior to field surveys (SWDIV, 1998a). The least Bell's
vireo (State-listed endangered species) was observed near Sites IA and ID. The Federal
and State endangered species requirements are identified as ARARs as indicated in
Table B-l. The Migratory Bird Act set forth in 16 USC 703 is a Federal ARAR for the
remedial actions at Sites 1 A, ID, and IE and may also be an ARAR for Sites 2A and IF
after the habitat recovers from the 1997 brushfire.
The substantive provisions of 36 CFR 800.4 for historical property identification are
considered applicable Federal ARARs for the OU3 remedial action sites. An archaeologist
will monitor excavation activities. If previously unidentified archaeological resources are
identified during the remedial actions, substantive provisions of 32 CFR 229.1 et seq. will
be applicable Federal ARARs. These sections require protection of archaeological
resources on Federal lands by consultation with the State Historic Preservation Officer.
Sites ID and IE are located within the designated boundary of the coastal zone, as
indicated on California Coastal Commission (CCC) maps that delineate the extent of the
coastal zone (CCC, 1993). The Federal and State requirements are applicable for
controlling direct significant impacts on coastal waters and for protecting State and
national interests in California coastal resources. The coastal zone requirements are
ARARs.
.Site ID is located within the 100-year floodplain and is subject to Federal ARARs
identified at 22 CCR 66264.18(b) and 40 CFR Part 6.
SCI/l
-------
2.2 ARARs for Site 7
The ARAR evaluation for Site 7 focused on the action-specific closure and postclosure
care requirements of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) and the State
municipal solid waste landfill (MSWLF) requirements. Air, vadose zone, and groundwater
action-specific requirements are discussed as appropriate. Limited location-specific
ARARs are discussed because the location of the landfill is fixed and only those
requirements that pertain to the selected removal action alternative are identified.
RCRA closure and postclosure requirements are set forth in Subtitle D for MSWLFs and
in Subtitle C for hazardous waste landfills. State requirements other than RCRA
requirements for closure and postclosure care of landfills are set forth in Tide 27 CCR
Division 2, Subdivision 1. California implemented portions of RCRA Subtitle D
requirements in Title 27 CCR, Division 2, Subdivision 1, and in SWRCB Resolution
No. 93-62. These requirements are discussed further in the following paragraphs.
RCRA Subtitle C requirements are applicable if the waste is a listed or characteristic waste
under RCRA and was treated, stored, or disposed of after the effective date of the RCRA
requirements or the activity at the CERCLA site constitutes treatment, storage, or disposal
as defined by RCRA (EPA, 1988). The wastes disposed of at Site 7 are not considered
listed wastes because their source cannot be identified. Because of the heterogeneous
nature of the landfilled wastes and because a representative sample could not be obtained
from the landfill, the hazardous characteristics of the waste were not tested. The landfill
stopped accepting municipal waste in 1984, after the effective date (1980) of the RCRA
requirements for hazardous waste. However, the hazardous wastes reportedly disposed of
at the site (Naval Energy and Environmental Support Activity, 1984) likely were deposited
before the effective date of RCRA. The capping of waste in place does not constitute
RCRA placement or disposal (EPA, 1988). Therefore, RCRA Subtitle C requirements are
not applicable for the Site 7 cap.
Although RCRA requirements are not applicable for Site 7, because of the similarity of the
landfill waste to a RCRA hazardous waste, the similarity of the site to a hazardous waste
landfill, and the similarity of the selected action to RCRA closure, those RCRA closure
and postclosure care requirements for landfills set forth in 22 CCR 66264.310 that are
pertinent and substantive are considered relevant and appropriate requirements and are
SCt/I&.9B/WPC/PendleuyRODI0.27.apb B-8
-------
considered Federal ARARs (Table B-2). Section 66264.310(a) requires the owner or
operator of a landfill to cover the landfill during final closure. The design and construction
requirements are detailed in Table B-2.
f
Significant provisions of RCRA Subtitle D requirements are set forth in 40 CFR 258 -
Criteria for Municipal Solid Waste Landfills. The purpose of the Subtitle D requirements
is to establish minimum national criteria under RCRA for all MSWLF units to ensure the
protection of human health and the environment. The criteria apply to owners and
operators of new MSWLF units and existing MSLWF units that received waste after
9 October 1991. The requirements do not apply to Site 7 because waste receipts at the
Box Canyon landfill stopped in 1984. However, most of the closure and postciosure care
requirements set forth in 40 CFR 258.60 and 258.61 are relevant and appropriate
substantive requirements. Section 258.60(a) requires owners or operators to install a final
cover system. Detailed substantive RCRA Subtitle D requirements that are Federal
ARARs for Site 7 are listed in Table B-2.
In October 1991, the EPA promulgated revised Federal laws and regulations on solid waste
disposal under RCRA Subtitle D (56 Federal Register 50978,9 October 1991). On
7 October 1993, the EPA issued a final determination of the adequacy for California's
MSWLF permit program, in compliance with 40 CFR 258 (58 Federal Register 52300,
7 October 1993). The EPA expects any owner or operator complying with the provisions
of a State program approved by the EPA to be in compliance with the Federal criteria
(56 Federal Register 50978 and 50995,9 October 1991).
CIWMB and SWRCB have combined their regulations for solid waste into Title 27 CCR
which became effective on July 18,1997. Regulations for closure and postciosure of solid
waste disposal sites for both agencies are listed in Table B-2. These regulations include
landfill cover design specifications, maintenance and monitoring requirements, and other
. requirements pertinent to landfill capping.
SWRCB requirements for discharges of waste to land went into effect on 27 November
1984. Because operations at the Box Canyon landfill ended in May 1984, the site is
considered an inactive unit. Therefore, these closure and postciosure care requirements are
not applicable but may be relevant and appropriate if they are more stringent than Federal
SCW(W8/WPOI»indfetc/ROD12-27.ii* B-9
-------
ARARs. The substantive provisions of 27 CCR that are more stringent than Federal
ARARs are listed in Table B-2 as State ARARs for Site 7.
Air emission requirements are identified in the SEP as Federal ARARs that affect the
design of landfill covers and implementation of construction activities. San Diego County
APCD requirements not included in the SIP have been identified as State ARARs that may
affect the design and construction of the proposed removal action. Pertinent and
substantive air requirements are listed in Table B-2, along with their ARAR status.
The Department of the Navy has determined that substantive provisions of 22 CCR
66264.98 are controlling ARARs for groundwater monitoring to measure the landfill cap
eff"tiveness *""*for postclosure landfill maintenance (Table B-2). Title 22 CCR
—66m.yH is considered "relevant and appropriate" and is a Federal ARAR because it was
approved by the EPA in its 23 July 1992 authorization of the State of California's RCRA
program Title 22 CCR 66264.98 requires that a detection monitoring program be
implemented and is essentially the sameas 27 CCR 20420 (formerly 23 CCR 2550 8)
The Federal ARAR (22 CCR 66264.98) is controlling because the State monitoring
requirements (27 CCR 20420) are not more stringent and are. therefore, not potential
ARARs. The NCP (40 CFR 300.400[g]) provides that only State standards more stringent
than Federal standards may be ARARs (see also Section 121[d][2][AJ[ii] of CERCLA).
The corrective action management unit (CAMU) requirements are Federal ARARs for
Site 7, where the excavated soil from the OU3 remedial action sites will be placed. These
requirements are set forth in 40 CFR 264.552(c) and (e); they allow for consolidation of
wastes in a more cost-effective.approach while still protecting human health and the
environment. Placement of remediation wastes into or within a CAMU does not constitute
land disposal of hazardous waste or creation of a unit subject to minimum technology
requirements and, as such, are not subject to land disposal requirements. The Department
of the Navy has designated Site 7 as a CAMU for the consolidation of excavated soil from
OU3 Sites lAi ID, IE, IF, and 2A by applying the substantive CAMU regulations but not
the procedural requirements. The following seven criteria of 40 CFR 264.552(c) were
evaluated based on the Site 7 rationale provided after each:
SCl/JO-9VWPCVPeadktn«ODJ2-27jpb B-10
-------
1. The CAMU shall facilitate the implementation of reliable, effective, protective, and
cost-effective corrective action measures.
The use of Site 7 as a CAMU for the disposal of excavated soil from OU3 sites is a
reliable, effective, and protective remedy. A landfill cap will be placed over the
excavated soil to limit mobilization of contaminants and minimize potential exposure
The use of Site 7 as a CAMU is more cost-effective than other alternatives evaluated
such as off-site disposal.
2. Waste management activities associated with the CAMU shall not create unacceptable
nsks to humans or to the environment resulting from exposure to hazardous wastes,
hazardous substances, or hazardous constituents.
The excavated soils from OU3 sites arc not expected to result in any unacceptable risks
£ 1^~^U°?' Sitc data has facep evaluated to assess if soils from Sites I A. ID.
--
~ . .
™Hiviffiti-2A-wOTddTmpact groundwater beneath Site 7. Results of the DLM using
RI data and leachability testing of site soils show that placement of the wastes at Site 7
from these five sites would not have a detrimental impact on groundwater Further
evaluation of existing soil and groundwater data, soil pH, landfill gas generation
features of the planned cap at Site 7, and local rainfall data was performed to assess the
leaching potential from the site soils. Each of the factors evaluated indicate that metals
present in the soils to be placed at Site 7 will not adversely impact groundwater
Details of this evaluation are presented in the Technical Memorandum for Leaching
Potential of Sites 1A, ID, IE, IF, and 2A dated 2 October 1998 (SWDIV 1998c)
Review of this evaluation by the EPA's Office of Research and Development found the
evaluation to be technically acceptable and found little risk of metals mobilization from
the consolidated/capped contaminated soils (EPA, 1998).
3. The CAMU shall include uncontaminated areas of the facility, only if including such
areas of the purpose of managing remediation waste is more protective than
management of such wastes at contaminated areas of the facility.
Excavated soil from OU3 sites will only be located within the existing footprint of the
Site 7 landfill and will not include uncontaminated areas.
4. Areas within the CAMU, where wastes remain in place after closure of the CAMU,
shall be managed and contained so as to minimize future releases, to the extent
practicable.
The Site 7 landfill will be capped to contain the excavated soU and minimize the
potential for future releases from the soil to groundwater.
5. The CAMU shall expedite the timing of corrective action activity implementation
when appropriate and practicable.
SCT1^98/WPQPeodJettrfRODl2-27jj* .B-l 1
-------
6- The CAMU shall enable the use «*-,
The areal configuration of the CAMU
monitoring a, Ste 7 have been idemif rcq"IIe'M1"s for E™«lwac«
idenUfie, in Tabie B-2.
-------
maintenance and control of the sites and elimination of the postclosure escape of hazardous
waste. The excavation of the contaminated soil will comply with these requirements.
3.0 References.
California Coastal Commission, 1993, Maps indicating coastal zone designations for
County of San Diego. June.
California Regional Water Quality Control Board, 1986, The Designated Level
Methodology for Waste Classification and Cleanup Level Determination, updated June
I 7O7*
CCC, see California Coastal Commission.
EPA, see U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.
RWQCB, see California Regional Water Quality Control Board, Central Valley Region.
Naval Energy and Environmental Support Activity, 1984, "Initial Assessment Study of
Marine Corps Base, Camp Pendleton, California," NEESA, 13-057, prepared by SCS
Engineers, Inc., September.
Southwest Division Naval Facilities Engineering Command, 1995, "Marine Corps Base
Camp Pendleton, California, Engineering Evaluation/Cost Analysis (EE/CA) for
Installation of a Cap at Site 7 - Box Canyon Landfill," Draft Final, 25 September.
Southwest Division Naval Facilities Engineering Command, 1996a, "Marine Corps Base
Camp Pendleton, California, Remedial Investigation/Feasibility Study, Technical
Addendum to the RI Report for Group B Sites," Draft Final, 15 November.
Southwest Division Naval Facilities Engineering Command, 1996b, "Marine Corps Base
Camp Pendleton, California, Remedial Investigation/Feasibility Study, RI Report for
Group C Sites," Draft Final, prepared by Jacobs Engineering Group Inc., 12 November.
Southwest Division Naval Facilities Engineering Command, 1997, "Marine Corps Base
Camp Pendleton, California, Remedial Investigation/Feasibility Study, Remedial
Investigation for Group D Sites," Draft Final, 16 July.
Southwest Division Naval Facilities Engineering Command, 1998a, "Marine Corps Base
Camp Pendleton, California, Remedial Investigation and Feasibility Study for Operable
Unit 3," Draft Final, 1 May.
SCU10-9«/WPC/PendJet
-------
^ ****** a»«* 1998b, "Final Minutes o the
Southwest Division Naval
SWDIV, see Southwest Division Naval Facilities Engineering Command.
SWRCB, see California State Water Resources Control Board.
fi-14
-------
TABLE B-1
Applicable or Relevant and Appropriate Requirements for
OU3 Sites 1 A, 1D, 1E, 1F, and 2A
MCB Camp Pendloton
(Sheetl of 4) ,
Federal or
State
ARAR or
TBC
ss^sesac
Federal8
Citation
22CCR
66264.94(a)(1) and
(3),(c),(d).and(e)
Requirement
Groundwater protection standards: Owners/operators
of RCRA treatment, storage, or disposal facilities must
comply with conditions in mis section that are designed
to ensure that hazardous constituents entering the
groundwater from a regulated unit do not exceed the
concentration limits for contaminants of concern (set
forth under Section 66264.94) in the uppermost aquifer
underlying the waste management area beyond the
point of compliance.
Comments
Relevant and appropriate for soil excavation cleanup
levels at SitesTA. 1D. 1 E, 1 F, and 2A as specified in
Table 2-1.
State
California Regional
Water Quality
Control Board,
Central Valley
Region
Desiq
F for Waste Classification
DIM is a method for demonstrating acceptable
contaminant concentrations in soilto meet State
discharge requirements in 27 CCR 20230
Federal"
22 CCR 66264.18(5}
Facility must be designed, constructed, operated, and
maintained to avoid washout.
Relevant and appropriate for Site 1D, which is
located within a 100-year floodplain.
Federal
40 CFR 6. Appendix
FV (excluding &[a][2],
41 andfei);
•JCFRB3b2(b)
Actions taken should avoid adverse effects, minimize
potential harm, and restore and preserve natural and
beneficial values.
Applicable for Site 10; Site 1D is located within a
floodplain.
Federal
36 CFR 800.4
(a),(b),(c). and (e)
Identify potentially affected historic properties or cultural
resources.
Applicable for excavation activities at OU3 sites
which constitute a Federal undertaking.
Federal
16USCl536(a)
Action to conserve endangered species or threatened
species, including consultation with the Department of
the Interior
Applicable for Sites 1A, 1D. and 1E where
endangered or threatened species have been
pbseyed on or near the sites. Potentially applicable
for Sites 1F and 2A after habitat recovers from wild
SCl/10-98/WPC/ROD I0-28..lbl
-------
Federal or
State
ARARor
TBC
• I IHI«I
Federal
i-
Federal
Federal*
Citation
e=a
Section
CFR ggc
16 USC 703
Fish and Game
code
Section 2080
^™^^™"^™^™"^^™^"^^-™^
Public Resources
Code §30000-
3Q900;14CCR
13001-13666.4
—
22CCR
66264.111(8) and
(b, excluding
references to
procedural require-
ments such as plans
and notifications.
|2CCR66264.13(a,
TABLE B-1
MCB Camp Pendlefon
(Sheet 2 of 4)
Requirement
Comments
'tent with approved
ifor
-Jfflffi®ffl^,v**isir?''
-------
TABLE B-1
Applicable or Relevant and Appropriate Requirement* for
OU3 Sites 1A, 10,1E, 1F, and 2A
MCB Camp Pendleton
(Sheet 3 of 4)
Federal or
State
ARAR or
TBC
Federal*
Federal"
Federal
Federal ;
State j
Citation
22 CCR 66262.34
22 CCR
66264.552(c) and
also:
(40CFR264.552(cJ
andlej) IJ
40 USC 7410;
portions of 40 CFR
52.220 applicable to
San Dlegp County
Air Pollution Control
District (APCD)
APCDRula50(d)(1)
Title 27 CCR,
Division 2,
Subdivision 1.
Discharges of Waste
to Land, Sections
20200-20230
Requirement
Generator may accumulate waste on-site for 90 days or
less or must comply with requirements for operating a
sfor0£jQ ?&Cillfy.
CAMU. Placement of remediation wastes into or within
a CAMU does not constitute land disposal of hazardous
wastes or creation of a unit subject to minimum
technology requirements.
Provisions of State Implementation plan (SIP) approved
by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)
under Section 110 of CAA.
No person shall discharge Into the atmosphere from
any single source of emissions, for more than 3
minutes In any 60-minute period, any air contaminant
that Is darker lhan number 1 on the Ringelmann chart.
Regulates siting, design, construction, operation,
closure, and monitoring of waste discharges to land for
treatment, storage, orflsposal, Includlnglandfills,
surface Impoundments, waste piles, and land treatment
facilities. Wastes regulated Include hazardous,
designated, nonhazardous, and inert wastes.
Comments
Potential applicable for on-site storage of
contaminated soil. All excavated souls proposed to
b« removed from site daily.
Appifcabie for on-base placement of excavated soil.
Specific pertinent rules are listed below.
Fugitive dust emissions of partlculate matter are
expected for excavation and transportation of soil.
Applicable for the placement of excavated soil on
base. Relevant and appropriate for soil left In place.
SCt/10-98/WPcmODIO-28..tbl
-------
Federal or
State
ARAR or
TBC
H«
State
State
Citation
Comprehensive
Water Quality
Control Plan for the
San Dtego Basin
WitefCodeSectton
Rah and Game
Code,
Section 3005
TABLE B-1
Applicable or Relevant and Appropriate Rtqulremente for
OU3SHet1A,1D,1E,1F,and2A
MCBCampPendleton
(Sheet 4 of 4)
Requirement
^^^^""^^•••••n
Prohibits taking animate with nets, poison, cage, etc.
The
there
discussion.
APCD - Air pollution Control District
ARARa-Applicable
CAA-Clean Air Act.
CAMU - Corrective Action Management Unit.
CCR - California Code of Regulations.
CFR - Code of Federal Regulations.
References:
California Coastal Commission. 1993.
Comments
{ppljceWe for the soli excavation at Sites 1A, 1D, 1E,
Soli contaminants couM be poisonous to animals.
EPA - U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.
OU- Operable unit
RCRA - Resource Conservation and Recovery Act
SIP - State Implementation Plan.
TBC-To be considered.
USC -United States Code.
i, June.
SCI/10.98WPC/RODl(MB..tbl
(
-------
TABLE B-2
Applicable or Relevant and Appropriate Requirements
Site 7 - Box Canyon Landfill
MCB Camp Pendleton
(Sheet 1 of 7)
Federal or
State ARAR or
TBC
=
! Federal
Federal
Federal
Slate
State
Citation
•i =
Title 40, Code of Federal
Regulations (CFR).
258.61(a)(4)
40CFR258.60(a)(2)and
(3)
40CFR258.60(a)(3)
40CFR258.61(a)and(b)
27CCR21135(a)(b)(Oand
(g)and27CCR21180(a)(i)
Iformerty 14 CCR 17767(6),
(d), and (e) and
17788(a)(3)]
27 CCR 21142(a) (formerly
14 CCR 17776(e)]
Requirement
======- —=
A gas monitoring system must be maintained and
monitored in accordance with 40 CFR 258.23.
——^^————________
The final cover must have a permeability less than or
equal to the permeability of any bottom liner system or
?S?«U r80"? Prasent °r a P6"™8*"* no greater than
SJ^!"16 ers P61"Second (°nVs)- whichever is less
TTw infiltration layer must contain a minimum of 18 inches
of earthen material.
An erosion layer must be provided, must contain a
minimum of 6 inches of earthen material, and must be
capable of sustaining native plant growth
— a ——________
Postclosure care must be conducted for 30 years Based
on protectiveness of human health and the environment
me postclosure care period may be shortened or
lengthened.
Sign(s) shall be posted at all points of access at the site
and for a period of not less than one hundred eighty (180)
days after the facility has received the final shipment of
waste stating the intended date of last receipt of waste at
the site and the location of alternative permitted solid
waste management facilities. Sites which do not allow
public disposal shall be exempt from the provisions of this
section. The operator shall ensure that all points of
access to the site are restricted to protect public health
and safety. Once closure activities are complete site
access by the public may be allowed.
Comments
^BSSBSSS^^-^^™"?
%^^2*^f*te**>™*27.
Regulations (CCR), Section
J4 CCR Section17783/al
Relevant and appropriate for Site 7 cover.
— _.
Relevant and appropriate for Site 7 cover.
Only relevant and appropriate as related to
capping requirements.
Applicable.
Final grades must be designed to reduce impacts to
health and safety and take into consideration any
postclosure land use. Final grading requirements
concerning water quality protection are in Section
21090(b).
Applicable.
SCI/8-98AVPC/Pem)lelo/ROD8-24 la!
-------
Federal or
State ARAR or
TBC
I State
State
State
State
Federal1
TABLE B-2
Applicable or Relevant and Approprlato Requlremtnts
Site 7 - Box Canyon Landfill
MCB Camp Pendleton
(Sheet 2 of 7)
Citation
Requirement
14 CCR ?JJSiI10m0rty RTires oime«*>P«tor *> Produce five veany iso"
14 CCR 17778(OJ | settlement maps subsequent to the creation and
submittal of the initial postctosure topographic map.
Comments
Applicable.
27CCR215SO(a).(b).and
(c) Iformerty 14 CCR
17778(8) and (c) to (j)J
'— -' i . •.
The drainage and erosion control system shall be
destgned and maintained to ensure Integrity of
postdosure land uses; to prevent public contact with
wastes; to ensure integrity of gas monitoring systems; to
prevent safety hazards; and to prevent exposure of
waste.
^>Rms~ I ittzsssssssssssff I*-*
postdosure maintenance. Methane must not exceed
1.25 percent by volume in air within on-site structures
Concentrations of methane gas migrating from the landfill
must not exceed 5 percent by volume in air at the facility
property boundary. Trace gases shall be controlled to
prevent adverse acute and chronic exposure to toxic
and/or carcinogenic compounds.
27CCR21180(a)(formerty
14 CCR 17788(a) and (b))
. —
22CCR66264.94(a)(1)
and(3).(c),(d).and(e)
comply with conditions in this section that are designed to
ensure mat hazardous constituents entering the ground-
water from a regulated unit do not exceed the
concentration limits for contaminants of concern (set forth
under Section 66264.94) in the uppermost aquifer
underlying the waste management area beyond the point
of compliance.
SCI/8-98/WPC/Pendlelo/ROD8-24 la I
-------
TABLE B-2
Applicable or Relevant and Appropriate Requirements
Site 7 - Box Canyon Landfill
MCB Camp Pendleton
(Sheet 3 of 7)
Fedoral or
State ARAR or
TBC
Federal*
Federal'
Federal'
Federal'
Federal*
Faderal'
Federal*
Federal*
Federal'
Citation
22 CCR 66264.98
22CCR 66264.25
22 CCR 66264.117(b)(1)
and (2)
22 CCR 66264.310(c)
22 CCR 66254.228(e)(1)
22CCR66264.228(e)(4)
22CCR66264.228(e)(5)
and (7)
22 CCR 68264.228(e)(10)
22CCR66264.228(e)(11)
Requirement
Groundwater detection monitoring program.
Cover and drainage control systems shall be designed to
function without failure when subjected to capacity.
hydrostatic, and hydrodynamic loads resulting from a 24-
hour maximum precipitation storm. Covers and cover
systems and all containment and control features shall be
designed, constructed, and maintained to withstand the
maximum credible earthquake without decrease to the
level of protection of public health and the environment.
Postdosure care shall begin after completion of closure
and continue for 30 years. Based on protectiveness to
human health and the environment, the posldosure care
period may be shortened or lengthened.
A control system must be provided to prevent migration
of gas.
If waste is to remain in a unit, the unit shall be compacted
before any portion of the final cover is installed.
A foundation layer shall be provided for the compacted
barrier. •
A compacted barrier layer of clean earth shall be
provided above the foundation layer. A nonearthen layer
may be used as the barrier layer if it will equally impede
fluid movement and be as durable.
A water drainage layer, blanket, or channel must be
provided above the compacted barrier layer.
A filler layer must be provided above the water drainage
layer.
Comments
Relevant and approprite for measuring the
effectiveness of the landfill cap at Site 7 and
for postdosure maintenance.
Relevant and approprite for Site 7 landfill.
Only relevant and appropriate as related to
the capping requirements.
Relevant and appropriate.
Relevant and appropriate. Waste is to be left
in place for the Site 7 remedial action.
Relevant and appropriate.
Relevant and appropriate.
Relevant and appropriate.
Relevant and appropriate.
SCI/8-98/WPC/Pendlcio/RODU-24 (a!
-------
. ,. t TABLE B-2
^P1'"^^^
Site7-BoxCanyon Undflif
MCBCampPendfeton
(Sheet 4 of 7)
Ftderal or
State ARAR or
TBC
a
I Federal1
Federal1
Federal-
Federal"
Citation
Raqulremtnt
Comments
=K^E5S5S5C
Relevant and appropriate.
|22CCR66264.228(e)(13)
.
22 CCR 66264.228(0
—•——- ——_
22 CCR 66264.309(a)
—^•^^^
'(a)(1)
fagsuffJcJenttaDrauftrrf
iss^s1^^
riate.
Relevant and appropriate.
Slate
SCI/8-98/WPC/Pcndle(0/ROD8-24 lal
-------
TABLE B-2
Applicable or Relevant and Appropriate Requirements
Site 7 - Box Canyon Landfill
IWCB Camp Pendleton
(Sheet 5 of 7)
1 Federal or
State ARAB or
TBC
•
State
State
State
State :
Slate
State
Slate
Citation
27 OCR 20365(c) and
(formerly 23 CCR 2546
and (d)J
27CCR 20950(d) [form
23 CCR 2580(d)J
27 CCR 21090(a)(1)
[formerly 23 CCR
2581(a)(1)1
27CCR21090(a)(2)
formerly 23 CCR
2581(a)(2)J
27 CCR 21090(a){3)
formerly 23 CCR
2581(a)(3)J
27CCR 21090(b)(1)
formerly 23 CCR
2581(bK1»
APCD Rule 50(d)(1)
Diversion and drainage facilities shall be designed,
constructed and maintained to accomrnodale the
anticipated volume of precipitation and peak flows.
Collection and holding facilities associated with drainage
control shall be emptied immediately or otherwise
managed to maintain the design capacity.
Closed waste management units shall be provided with
two permanent monuments, installed by a licensed land
surveyor or a registered civil engineer,|from which the
location and elevation of wastes, containment structures
and monitoring facilities can be determined throughout
the postctosure period.
Closed landfills shall be provided with not less than 2 feet
of appropriate materials as a foundation layer for the final
cover.
tot less than 1 foot of soil containing no waste or
(eachate shall be placed on top of the foundation layer
and be compacted to a permeability of 1x10-* cnvs or
ess or equal to the permeability of underlying geology or
iner, whichever is less.
Yot less than 1 foot of topsoil containing no waste or
eachate shall be placed on top of (a)(2) layer and
vegetation rooting depth must hot exceed the depth to
the (a)(2) layer.
losed landfills shall be graded and maintained to
wevenl ponding and to provide slopes of at least 3
jercent.
lo person shall discharge into the atmosphere from any
ingle source of emissions for more than 3 minutes in any
>0-minute period any air contaminant, other than
ncombined water vapor, that is darker than No. 1 on the
Ingelmann chart.
Comments
—-
Relevant and appropriate.
Relevant and appropriate.
Relevant and appropriate.
Relevant and appropriate.
Relevant and appropriate.
Applicable.
pplicable. Remedial action activities will
nclude engineering controls to limit emissions
f fugitive dust.
SCI/8-98/WPC/Pcndlclo/ROD8-24.tal
-------
TABLE B-2
Applicable or Relevant and Appropriate Requirements
Site 7- Box Canyon Landfill
MCB Camp Pendleton
(Sheet 6 of 7)
Federal or
State ARAR or
TBC
State
State
State
Citation
=•=
APCD Rule 52
.
|APCDRute59(a)and
Rule59(d)(1)(ii)
APCD Rule 59(e)(1)
Requirement
Paniculate matter from any source may not fan
'aste disposal sites with the
exceeded in the absence of a gas control system.
toaUtallU-rr^c^^^^
£5C? ^ ?arts "* "*" -SSSXSSLl
llSS^StltTrlam^nic^n^ms^
e^ceea inresnold levels established by the California A
Resources Board (CARS) or threshold limit values ^
established by the American Conference of
Governmental Industrial Hyjjienisls (ACGIH) or anv
*£SSsf2i!r -^p'^ Sal°s o
| numan beings, and there are no detectable emissions of
Comments
«,«^ fr M'nor fU9itive dusf emissions are
expected from excavation and storage of soil.
—•—
Every landfill owner/operator shall analyze the
•
Applicable^ Substantive provisions only (State!
rule not included in SIP).
Sn/8-->8/WPf/Pendlrto/ROI)g.24ia|
(
-------
TABLE B-2
Applicable or Relevant and Appropriate Requirements
Site 7 • Box Canyon Landfill
MCB Camp Pendleton
(Sheet 7 of 7)
Federal or
State ARAR or
TBC
Slate
Citation
Comprehensive Water
Quality Control Plan for the
San Diego Basin (Basin
Plan) Water Code Section
13240
Requirement
Establishes beneficial uses of groundwater; established
water quality objectives.
Comments
-————-—_
Applicable for groundwater monitoring at
Site 7.
Slate
Fish and Game Code
Sections 5650 and 5852
It is unlawful to deposit in. permit to pass into, or place
where it can pass into the waters of this Slate any
material listed in Fish and Game Code Sections 5650
and 5652.
Applicable. Site 7 may leach if not capped
under the presumptive remedy.
The provisions of the California Hazardous Waste Control Act that have been approved by the EPA
'
ACGIH -American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienisls.
APCD- Air Pollution Control District.
ARAR -i Applicable or relevant and appropriate requirement.
BACT - Best available control technology.
CARB - California Air Resources Board.
CCR - California Code of Regulations.
CFR - Code of Federal Regulations.
cm/s - Centimeters per second.
MCB - Marine Corps Base.
RCRA - Resource Conservation and Recovery Act.
SIP • State implementation plan.
TBC - To be considered
SCI/8-98/WPC/Pendl«o/ROD8-24 lal
-------
-------
APPENDIX C
ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD INDEX
-------
-------
DATE - 08/24/98
UIC NO. DOC.NO. PRC.DATE FROM.... ^."** "!'"'LETON ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD FILE INDEX (SORTED BY DOC. DATE)
PAGE
DOCUMENT. TYPE. .. DOC.DATE
CONTR/GUID..NO.. CTO.NO.
APPROX.».OF.PACES EPA.CATi
M00681
DATA
0004
DATA
0004
M00681
DATA
0001
001921
002017
DATA
ooooooooooooooo
0004
DATA
000000000000000
0003
DATA
0003
.DATA .
0004
DATA
OOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
0009
DATA
0001
06/28/94
04.3
02.1 .
02.2
09/16/80
00000
03.2
04/19/82
00000
03.2
12/08/89
01.1
08/07/91
03.2
OS/17/94
03/01/92
0016S
02. 2
03/03/92
00166
02.2
FROM. SIGNATURE
TO..
TO. SIGNATURE
MCB CAMP PENDLETON
HCB CAMP PENDLETON
MCB CAMP PENDLETON
MCB CAMP PENDLETON
MCB CAMP PENDLETOH
R. CHAMBERS
SOUTHWEST DIVISIOH
HCB CAMP PENDLETON
A.E. THOMPSON
MCB CAMP PENDLETOH
• ' ' SUBJECT CLASSIFICATION
PROPOSED REMEDIAL ACTION OBJECTIVES FOR SOIL GROUP A ADMIH RECORD
SITES. ECOLOGICAL RISK ASSESSMENT FOR MCB CAMP PBNDLE-
TON.
SUMMARY OF ANALYTICAL DATA FOR SURFACE IMPOUNDMENT ADMlii RECORD
CONSTITUENTS.
SITE VISIT COLLECTING SAMPLES AND TIMES SAMPLES MERE ADMIH RECOHD~~
COLLECTED.
LOS FLORES B-4K14 MCB CAMP PENDLETOH DATA AWHH RECORD ~~
ANALYTICAL DATA MCB CAMP PENDLBTON fll ' MHil) RECORD
HCB CAMP PENDLETON INSTALLATION RESTORATION PROGRAM ADMIN RECORD ""
BACKGROUND.
CONTAMINATED SOIL TREATMENT. PROJECT ACTIVATION ADMIN RECORD
GUIDELINES.
DATA VALIDATION REPORT FOR MCB CAMP PENDLETON ADMIN RECORD
MATRIX: SOIL PARAMETER! ORGAHOCHLORINE
PESTICIDES PCS* SPGI SOS2S
DATA VALIDATION REPORT FOR MCB CAMP PENDLETON ADMl'S' RECORD
MATRIX: SOIL PARAMETER-. VOLATILES X".TJRD
SDGH SOS2S
KEY WORDS
RA
RISK
SAP
SLUDGE
SV
SLUDGE
DATA
DATA
IAS
FS
RI
REMOVAL (3)
REMOVAL (6)
TSDF
PESTICIDES
PCB
VOLATILES
...Site Location
GROUP A
8A SOUTHWEST DIVISION
GROUP B
OU2
SOUTHWEST DIVISION
3 SOUTHWEST DIVISIOH
4
S
6
S
41
GROUP A
GROUP 8
OU1.0U2
GROUP A SOUTHWEST DIVISION
-------
DATE - 01/24/JI
UIC Ho. DOC.NO.
DOCWtEHT.TYPE...
COHTR/GUID. .NO..
PRO. DATE
DOC.DATB
CTO.NO..
APPHOX.I.OF.PAGES EPA.CATS
MCB
FROM
FROM.SICNATUJIE.'.',
TO
CAMP PENOLETOH ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD PILE I»DEX (SORTED
SUBJECT
MOOCH
DATA
DOOI
000*06
05/17/94
03/03/92
00166
02.2
v REPORT FOR MCB CAMP PENDLETON
X, SOIL PARAMETER: SEHIVOLATILES
SDGf 5052S
BY DOC. DATE)
• • • CLASSIFICATION KEY WORDS
""""*"***"•""""*"•••••••• •*<"•«»»•«»«
ADMIN RECORD SEMIVOLATILES
PACE • 2
Location
H006B1000107OS/17/94
DATA 03/03/92
001(6
0009 02
DATA VALIDATIOH REPORT FOR HCB CAMP
H00681 000808OS/17/94
DATA OJ/03/92
00166
ADMIN RECORD "SEMIVOLATILES
*™
: SOIL PARAMETER: SEMIVOLATILES
5/17/9*
03/03/92
00166
02.2
DATA VALIDATION REPORT FOR HCB CAMP
MATRIX: SOIL PARAMETER: VOWTILES
SOGH S0525
ADMIN RECORD VOMTILES
Moosei
DATA
ooooooooooooooo
0003
07/20/94
03/03/92
00000 HCB CAMP PENDLETON
02.2
ADMIN RECORD "FUEL
SWfHHEST DIVISION
M00681
DATA
ooooooooooooooo
0007
07/20/94 ROY F. HESTOH
03/04/92
00000 HCB CAW PENOLETON
02.2
ADHIM RECORDMETALS
SOUTHWEST DIVISION
MOOfill
DATA
35073
0256
M00681
DATA
3S12I
0297
000611
000612
OS/13/94 CH2M HIt,r
03/09/92 PEtfflK A. NORTON
00166 CH2H HILL
02.2 BAM, BYRON
05/13/94 CH2H HILL
03/09/92 PEGGY A. NORTON
00166 IT CORPORATION
02.2 DAVE MARK
ADMIN RECORD PESTICIDES'
PCB
TFH
PCB. TFH. HERBICIDES. METALS
ADMIW RECORD
PESTICIDES
PCB
TFH
HERBICIDE
METALS
H0068100079405/J7/94
DATA 03/09/92
• 00166
0007 02.2
-------
DATE - 08/24/91
UIC Ho. DOC. NO.
DOCUMENT. TYPE. . .
PRC.DATE FROM
DOC. DATE FROM. SIGNATURE
CONTR/GUID. .KO. . CTO.NO. . TO...".
APPROX.K.OF.PAOES EPA. CAT* TO. SIGNATURE
M006B1 000816
DATA
0007
DATA
35121
0390
DATA
35071
0201
DATA
0009
DATA
0006
DATA
0006
DATA
0009 .
DATA
0039
DATA
000000000000000
0005
OS/17/94
03/09/92
0015S
02.2
;03/lO/92 PEGGY A. NORTON
,00166 IT CORPORATION
02.2 DAVE MARKLY
OS/13/94 CH2H HILL
03/10/92 PEGGY A. KORTOH
00166 CH2H HILL
02.2 EARL BYROM
03/10/92
00166
02.2
03/10/92
00166
02.2
03/10/92
00166
02.2
03/10/92
00166
02.2
03/10/92
MCB CAMP PENDLETON
02.2
03/10/92
00000 MCB CAHP PENDLETON
02.2
SUBJECT .
DATA VALIDATION REPORT FOR MCB CAMP PENDLETON
MATRIX: SOIL I WATER PARAMETER: ORGANOCHLOHINB
PEST1CIDES\PCBB SDGK S0598
ANALYTICAL DATA MCB CAMP PBNDLETON
PESTICIDES. PCB, TFH. HERBICIDES, METALS
ANALYTICAL DATA MCB CAMP PENDLETON BIO ACCUMULATION
PESTICIDES, PCB, TFH, HERBICIDES. METALS
DATA VALIDATION REPORT HCB CAMP PENDLETON
MATRIX: SOIL PARAMETER: ORCANOCHLORINE
PESTICIDES\PCBfl SDC» S0636
DATA VALIDATION REPORT MCB CAMP PENDLETON
MATRIX: SOIL t HATER PARAMETER: ORGANOCHLORINE
PESTlClDES\PC8a SDGB S0617
DATA VALIDATION REPORT FOR MCB CAMP PENDLETON
MATRIX! HATER £ SOIL PARAMETER: ORGMIOCHLORINE
PESTICIDES\PCBs SDGS S0617
DATA VALIDATION REPORT FOR MCB CAMP PENDLETON
MATRIX: SOIL PARAMETER: OROANOCHLORINE
PESTICIDESNPCBB SDO» S0636
DATA VALIDATION REPORT MCB CAMP PENDLETON
MATRIX: SOIL PARAMETERS: PCDD 1 PCDFa
LAB: ENSECO-CAL SDG» S0598
PARAMETERS: TAL METALS AND MOLYBDENUM
SDG: S0636
t DOC. DATE)
. . CLASSIFICATION KEYWORDS ...Site Location
ADMIN RECORD HATER
PESTICIDES
PCB
ADMIN RECORD PESTICIDES
PCB
TFH
HERBICIDE
METALS
ADMIN RECORD PESTICIDES ' — '
PCB
TFH
HERBICIDE
METALS
ADMIN RECORD PESTICIDES ' "" ~™
PCB
ADMIN RECORD WATER ' ~
PESTICIDES
PCB
ADMIN RECORD HATER "~ •
PESTICIDES
PCB
ADMIN RECORD PESTICIDES ~~ ~~~~
PCB
ADMIN RECORD DATA " ~~ ~
ADMIN RECORD METALS SOUTHWEST DIVISION
PACE - 3
-------
DATE - 01/21/31
UIC No. DOC.NO. PRC.DATE FHOH "f?.^ PENDLETOH "WISTRATIVE RECORD FILE INDEX ISORTED BY DOC. DATE)
DOOWEHT.TYPE... DOC.DATE FROM-SIGNATURE
CONTR/GUID..NO.. CTO.Na,. TO
«— .............4. ..................... ..„._,,
HOOSM 002324 07/21/94 ROY F. WESTON
DATA 03/10/92
000000000000000 00000 MCB CAMP PENDLETOH
0005 02.2
M00681 0007»9 05/17/94 HESTON MANAGERS ' "
DATA 03/12/92
OOOOOOOOOOOOOOD OOUt IT CORPORATIOH
0512 02.2 DAVB HARK
H006»l 00235S 07/21/94 ESE '
DATA 03/12/92
000000000000000 00166 MCB CAMP PENDLETOH
M006B1 000797 OS/17/94 —
DATA 03/13/9J
00166
0007 02 .'2
M00681 000813 05/17/94 '
PATA 03/13/92
00166
0007 02.2
M00681 002307 :»7/20/9« ROY P. WESTON
DATA 03/13/92
000000000000000 00000 MCB CAMP PENDLETOH
0003 02.2
M00681 002311 07/20/94 Onv c ucc-mu
DATA 03/J3/92 :
000000000000000 00000 MCB CAHP PENDLETOH
0007 02.2
DATA 03/16/92
01F166S920066 00166 MCB CAMP PENDLETON
0241 02.2
M00681 0023S1 07/21/94 ESE — ~— — — — —
DATA 03/16/92
000000000000000 00166 MCB CAHP PENDLETON
0050 02.2
M006B1 000776 05/17/94 HESTION MANAGERS
DATA 03/19/92
00166 IT CORPORATIOH
0271 02.2
SUBJECT ni.^o.n.-.
CLASSIFICATION
MATRIX: HATER AND SOIL ,^,.
PARAMETERS: TAL METALS AND MOLYBDENUM AW IN RECORD
. SDQ; S0617
DIXIONS " FOR MCB OWP PEHDLBroH ADMIN RECORD
RFUV 9203S268
PARAMETERS: CARBAKATE/UREA PESTICIDES ^^ BECORD
SDG: G26823.C2S941.C28402.G28403.G28541.G29H6
DATA VALIDATION REPORT MCB CAHP PENDLETON ~ ifiurn **^~
MATRIX: SOIL PARAMETER: ORGANOCHLORINlT ADMI" BECORD
PESTICIDES\PCB» SDG» S06S7
SJ™.I!*LIDATION BEPORT FOR MCB CAMP PENDLETON ADMHi'sFrOBn
MATRIX: SOIL PARAMETER: ORGANOCHLOHINE
PESTICIDESVPCB, SDG» S0657
MATRIX- — cAjt — .
PARAMETERS: TPH GASOLINE AND TPH DIESEL «WIH RECORD
EDO; S06S7
IWTRIX: SOIL — —
DATA VALIDATION REPORT FOR MCB CAMP PENDLETON ' ADMIN RECORD
«SJIJ«fc"' t>ARAMETER: TRIAZINE. PESTICIDES LAB: BSE
SDCf G269S1,G27060,G28«70,G28964. 029112. 029391
PARAMETERS: CHLORINATED HERBICIDES CASE: NACPSI "*"" "ECORD
SDC: G27017. G29493. 028842, AND G287lT
LABORATORY REPORT FOR HCB CAMP PENDLETOH ' .-^TM —
DIXIONS I'tHULtlUN ADMIN RECORD
RFW» 9203S3S2
1 KEY WORDS
MATER
METALS
DATA
WATER
PESTICIDES
PESTICIDES
PCB
PESTICIDES
PCB
FUBL-
MBTALS '
PESTICIDES
HERBICIDE
HPCCD
•••Site location
SOUTHHEST DIVISION
S SOWHHEST DIVISION
23 SOUTHWEST DIVISION
~~" SOUTHWEST DIVISION
SOUTHWEST DIVISION
-
SOOTHHEST DIVISION
PAGE . 4
-------
DATE - 08/24/98
UIC NO. DOC.NO. PRC.DATE FROM. "?.^ PEHDLET011 «"»'««"« RECORD FILE INDEX (SORTED BY DOC. DATE)
PAGE
DOCUMENT. TYPE. . . DOC.BATE
CtaftR/OUIO..MO. . CTO.NO. .
APPROX.ftOF. PAGES EPA. CAT*
M006B1
DATA
0351
DATA
0419
DATA
0329
M00681
DATA
0339
DATA
0037
DATA
0030
DATA
OOS3
DATA
0045
DATA
0005
DATA
0004
000760
05/17/94
03/19/92
00166
'02.2
03/19/92
00166
02.2
03/19/32
OOK6
02.2
03/20/92
00166
02.2
03/26/92
00166
02.2
03/26/92
DD166
02.2
03/27/92
00166
02.2
03/27/92
00166
02.2
03/27/92
00166
02.2
03/27/92
00166
02.2
FROM. SIGNATURE. . . .
TO
TO. SIGNATURE
HESTOH MANAGERS
IT CORPORATION
IT CORPORATION
IT CORPORATION
DAVE HARK
IT CORPORATION
DAVE MARK
HCB CAMP FENDLETON
HESTON MANAGERS
MCB CAMP PENDLETON
HESTOH MANAGERS
MCB CAMP PENDLETON
IT CORPORATION
CLASSIFICATION KEYWORDS ...Site Location,
DmS0^ MTA TOR "^ CMf PENDLETOH ADMIN RECORD HPCCD
RFH» 9203S3SI
AWJLmCAL DATA FOR HCB CAMP PENDLETOH • ««!„ RECORD jfift — _
RFHS 9203S347
LABORATORY REPORT FOR HCB CAMP PENDLETON ADMIS RECORD HPCCD-
RFHI 4203531?
WBORATORY REPORT FOR MCB CAHP PENDLETON MMJN RECORD' HPCCD ~ ' —
RFH8 $2035373
LABORATORY REPORT FOB Mm cure DusmiBwu ADfiiti nnCOnE TfH ~~
TOTAL PUFOEABLE HYDROCARBONS AHA1YSIS
SOCK SOS98 RFWB 9203S317,9203S332,9203S347
LABORATORY REPORT FOR MCB CAMP PENDLETOM ADMIH RECORD TPH~ " ~
TOTAL PURGEABLE HYDROCARBONS ANALYSIS
SDG» SOS2S RFH8 9203S230, 9203S268. 92Q3SJ16
JS!SSSJIIoSSEL'St1!S,?w PE(roLETOM «>HIMREcoaD »*««««»
SDB» S0525 RFH» 9203S230, S203S26B, 9203S316
GC^WO^LrSs™" •" CM" KKDLEltJN ADMIH RECORD VOILES ~
SDG» SOS25 RFKtl 9203S230. 9203S268, 9203S316
DATA VALIDATION REPORT FOR HCB CAMP PENDLETON ADMIN RECORD HATER ' — •
MATRIX; WATER PARAMETER: ORCANOCHLORINE PESTICIDES
PESTICIDES PCBs SDG1I SOJ48 ^T4tJDES
DATA VALIDATION. REPORT FOR HCB CAMP PENDLETON ADMIH RECORD WATER ~ " —
MATRIX: WATER PARAMETER: SEHIVOLATILES SEMIVOLATILES
SDO» SOB49 SEMIVOLATILES
-------
DATE - 01/24/SJ
UIC Ho. DOC.(10.
DOCUMENT. TYPE...
COHTR/GUID. .NO..
PRC.DATB
DOC. DATE
CTO.NO.
APPKOX.I.OF.PAGES EPA. CM»
FROM ......... .
FHOH.SIGNATURE. ..'.
TO .........
TO.SIGNATURE! '.'.'.'.'.
PENDl^« ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD FILE IHOEX (SORTED m DOC.
................... .SUWECT
DATE)
CLASSIFICATION
KEY HOWS
PAGE -
•Sice Location
MATRIX: WATER PARAHETER: SEHIVOLATILES
PARAMETERS: TPH GASOLINE AND TPH DIESEL
M00681 002308
DATA
DODOOOOOOOOOOOO
0003
HOOS81002325
DATA
000000000000000
0005
FUEL
SOUTHWEST DIVISION
07/21/94
03/27/92
ooooo
02.2
HOY F. HESTON
MCB CAMP PENDLETON
SOUTHWEST DIVISION
ANALYTICAL DATA FOR HCB CAMP PEHDLETOM
DIXIOMS
RFN< 9203S438
N006H1
DATA
0028
000799
OS/17/94
03/30/92
001C6
02.2
LABORATORY REPORT FOR HCB CAMP PENDLETON '
PUMEABLE PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS ANALYSIS
SDO» S0«3« RFMK 9203S350.9203S351
KATRIX: KATER & SOIL PARAMETER: SEMIVOLATILES
H00681
DATA
ooos
000814
05/17/94
03/30/92
0016S
02.2
VALIDATION REPORT FOR MCB CAMP PEHDLETON"
SDG."o,oTL * "ATER PARAHETER: »««»*ni*
ADMIN RECORD
HATER ~
SEHIVOLATILBS
""PORT FOR HCB CAHP PEMOLBTOS
-------
DATE - Ofl/24/98
UICNO. DOC.NO. PRC.DATE FROM "« CAMP PENOLETON ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD FILE INDEX ISORTED BY DOC.-DATE)
PAGE •
DOCUHEHT.TYPE. . . DOC.DATE
CONTR/GUID. .NO. . CTO.NO. .
APPROX.I. OF. PAGES EPA.CAT»
M006M 002321
DATA
000000000000000
0008
DATA
0478
DATA
0034
DATA
0070
DATA
0020
DATA
0033
DATA
0310
DATA
0005
DATA
0278
DATA
0362
07/21/9*
03/30/92
00000
02.2
D3/J1/J2
00166
02.2
03/31/92
00166
02.2
03/31/92
0016«
03.2
OH/01/92
00166
02.2
04/01/92
0016C
02.2
04/01/92
0016«
02.2
OS/17/94
04/01/92
001(6
02.2
04/01/92
00166
02.2
05/17/94
04/OJ/92
00166
02.2
FROM . SIGNATURE .
TO
TO. SIGNATURE
KOI F. UESTON
HCB CAMP PENDLETON
IT CORPORATIOH
IT CORPORATION
IT CORPORATION
MCB CAMP PENDLETON
MCB CAMP PENDLBTON
HESTION MANAGERS
MCB CAMP PENDLETON
IT CORPORATION
DAVE HARK
IT CORPORATION
DAVE HARK
SUBJECT
MATRIX: HATER AND SOIL-
PARAMETERS: TAL METALS AND MOLYBDENUM
SDG: S0909
DIXIONS
RFMK 9203S<47
TOTAL EXTRACTABLE HYDROCARBONS ANALYSIS
SDGK SOS2S RFHS 9203S230.9203S268.9203S316
LABORATORY REPORT FOR HCB CAMP PENDLETON
INORGANICS ANALYSIS
SDGI SOS2S.RFH* 9203S330.9203S26B.920JS316
LABORATORY REPORT FOR WCB CAMP PENDLETON
TOTAL SXTRACTABLE PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS ANALYSIS
SDCt 50636 RFNK 9203S3S0.9203S3S1
LABORATORY REPORT FOR MCB CAMP PENDLETON
TOTAL EXTRACTABLE PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS ANALYSIS
SDG« SOS98 RFMK 92038317.92038332.92038347
LABORATORY REPORT ~fOR. MCB CflMP PBSDLETON
PESTICIDES\PC8
RFMK 9203S471
DATA VALIDATION REPORT FOR MCB CAMP PENDLETON
MATRIX: SOIL AND MATER PARAMETER: OROANOCHLORINE
PESTICIDES/PCB§ SDGH S0952
LABORATORY REPORT FOR MCB CAMP PENDLETON
VOLATILES
RFHI 9203S471
LABORATORY REPORT FOR HCB CAMP PENDLETON
DIXIONS
RFWB 9203S1SO
.. CLASSIFICATION KEYWORDS sice Location
ADMIN RECORD MATER SOUTHWEST DIV1S10N
METALS
ADMIN RECORD HPCCD ~~~ ~~
ADMIN RECORD TEH : — —
ADMIN RECORD IOO "
ADMIN RECORD ~TPH ~ •
ADMIN RECORD TPH ~ ~ — " "
ADMIN RECORD PESTICIDES
PCB
ADMIN RECORD HATER
PESTICIDES
PCB
ADMIN RECORD VOLATILES ~~
ADMIN RECORD " HPCCD ~~
-------
DATE - 01/24/91
<"£«?• tXJC-KO. PRC.OATE FROM ** ""* PEHD"™« AWIH1STRATIVE RECORD FILE INDEX (SORTED
SKfe: SSrE ™-SI™::::::
APPROX.I.OF.PAGES EPA.CATi TO.'sioNATORE.".'.'.' '
•"**••»•»»»•••••.. _ _ __
H006I1 002326
DATA
000000000000000
0001
H006I1000762
DATA
0027
0041
000763
M006«l000764
DATA
004)
MOOM1 000765
DATA
0037
H00681 000761
DATA
0328
M00681 000771
DATA
0243
07/21/94
04/01/92
00000
02.2
OS/17/94
04/02/92
00166
02.2
OS/17/94
04/02/92
OOUS
02.2
OS/17/94
04/02/92
00166
02.2
05/17/9T
04/02/92
00166
02.2
"05/17/94
04/02/92
00166
02.2
ROY P. HESTON
HCB CAMP- PENDLETON
HESTION MANAGERS
MCB CAHP PENDLETOH
HESTION MANAGERS
HCB CAMP PENDLETON
HESTION MANAGERS"
MCB CAMP PENDLETOH
HESTIOH MANAGERS"
MCB CAMP PENBLBTON
^BSTION MANAGERS
MCB CAMP PENDtETON
MATRIX: SOIL AND HATER
UUTCRATORY REPORT FOR HCB g^,, PHn)LETOI
TOTAL PETROELUM HYDROCARBONS ANALYSIS
SDGI S0657 HFHI 9203S352.9203S374
"UBORATORY REPORT FOR MCB CAMP PENDLEToiT
MT». »»».„. PETIiOELUH HYDROCARBONS ANALYSIS
9203S362.9203S363.9203S364.9203S399
SDGI SOH6 RFHD 9203SJ5B, 9203S351
LABORATORY REPORT FOR HCB CAHP
ORGANOPHOSPHOROOS PESTICIDE
SDGI S0525 RFHI 9203S361
fm
RFH* 9303S483
OS/17/94
04/02/92
00166
02.2
H00681000772
DATA
0027
000773
M0068100077S
DATA
0417
OS/17/94
04/02/92
00166
02.2
^05/17/94
04/02/92
00166
02.2
"05/17/94
04/02/92
00166
02.2
"HESTION MANAGERS"
MCB CAMP PENDLETON
HESTION MANAGERS
MC8 CAMP PENDLBTON
HESTIOH MANAGERS
HCB CAMP PENDLETON
HESTION MANAGERS
IT CORPORATION
RFHI 9203S4B5
ft DOC. DATE)
•-• CLASSIFICATION KEYWORDS
RECORD HATER
METALS
ADMIN RECORD fST
ADMIN RECORD TPH"
ADMIN RECORD:VOLATILES"
ADMIH RECORD PESTICIDES '
ADMIH RECORD HPCCD~
ADMIH RECORD HPCCD
PAGE . |
LABORATORY REPORT FOR MCB CAMP
ORGANOPHOSPHOROUS PESTIC1DK
SDGI S059I RFKI 9203S317. 9203S332.9203S341
RFHI 9203S4I3
ADMIN RECORD PESTICIDES"
ADMIN RECORD SEMIVOLATILES
Location
•
SOUTHWEST DIVISION
-------
DATE - 08/24/98
PRC.DATE "C" '*"'
ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD-PILE INDEX (SORTED BY DOC. DATE)
DOCUMENT. TYPE. .
CONTR/QUID. .NO.
APPROX.».OP.PAG
M00681 000777
DATA
0268
M00601
DATA •
0219
M00681
DATA
0013
DATA
0217
DATA
0525
HOOCH'
DATA
32461
0022
mom
DATA
323(4
0091
M00681
DATA
32461
0104
M00681
DATA
32364461
0226
M00681
DATA
0540
000778
000761
.000641
000685
. DOC.DATE FROM.SIGHATURE...
. CTO.NO.. TO...
••"•••••••••«•«•••••«••«•«,•
: 05/17/94 NESTION HANAGERS
04/02/9J
' 00166 IT CORPORATION
;02.2
,05/17/94 HESTIOH MANAGERS
'04/02/92
;00166 IT CORPORATION
.02.2
04/03/92
00186 HCB CAMP PENDLETON
02. S
DS/17/94 HESTION MANAGERS
04/03/92
00166 IT CORPORATION
02.2 DAVE MARK
05/18/94 MESTON MANAGERS
04/03/92
00166 IT CORPORATION
02.2
04/06/9Z PEGGY A. MORTON
00166 IT CORPORATION
02.2 DAVE MARK
05/13/94 CH2H HILL
04/06/92 PEGGY A. NORTON
00166 IT CORPORATION
02,2 DAVE MARK
04/06/92 PEGGY A. NORTON
00166 IT CORPORATION
02.2 DAVE MARK
04/06/S2 PEGGY A. NORTON
00166 IT CORPORATION
02.2 DAVE MARK
OS/13/94 ROY F. HESTION INC
04/06/92 :
00166 IT CORPORATION
02.2
• • SUBJECT CLASSiPTrxTinitf v»u LM*.
UNIFICATION KEY WORDS ...Site Location
««»»•«»»»•**•«•*• ••«•»«•• »•-•••••••,•••••*•.
••••"••'••'--«"•—-•— *•••• >••»••• •»•«-•••«..-•«,«_«.
"""—«»-"•-•«.»•.......„..«...„„„...,..„ mmmii
LABORATORY REPORT FOR HCB CAMP PENDLETOJ inuru ot^no^
PESTICIDES PCB ADHIH RECO»D PESTICIDES
RFIJK 9203S48J PCB
LABORATORY REPORT FOB MCB MMP pftHM.PTnB jmi.r.1 nn VMI^
RFHi 9203S483
LABORATORY REPORT FOR HCB CAMP DP«m.*™, mtlll imcujiu TTB
TOTAl PUROEABLE PETROELUM HALOCAREONS ANALYSIS ^"^ ™ "
SOOd SOI48 RFHI 9203S463
LABORATORY REPORT FOR HCB CAHP PP^m.*™ ~ BrnTr, nrrnm JTr
INORGANICS ~*i*» IVE.CUUU im, . — .
RFHff 9203S483
MBORATORY REPORT FOR MCB CAMP PENDLETON ADMIN RECORD fipCCD— •
RFWt 9204S501
DATJM/ALIDATION REPORT FOR MCB CAMP PEMm.Rr™ ' 'ftmtH BrmrtD DATA '
ssiBiS'Kssjr"1' FOR ™ CMIP PENDLETOH *"» «=3K — so? • —
?NOWA^CS*TIOM RBWRT F°R ^ CMW PEJ
-------
HCB
OWE - 08/24/51
UICMo. DOC.HO. PRC.DATE FROM
DOCUHajT.TrPE... DOC.DATE FROH.SICNATUBE.'.'
OWTR/GUID. .NO.. CTO.NO.. TO
APPROX.g.OF.PAGES EPA.CATS TO.sicNATtJRB!'.'.'.
CAHP MnLEIMf MHINinMTlVE RECORD FILE Im>EX ISORTED BY DOC. DATE)
PAGE . jo
..SUBJECT
M006B1
DATA
004)
000552
05/13/94
04/07/92
OOU(
02.2
HEST10N MANAGERS
IT CORPORATION
LABORATORY REPORT FOB HC8 CAMP PEHDLETOH
ORGANOCHLORINK PESTICIDES t PCB» ANALYSIS
SDOK S0525 urn
CLASSIFICATION
"»**««*••••»»•»»»«..-iB1
ADMIN RECORD
KEY HORDS
Location
05/1J/94
04/07/92
001«fi
02.2
HESTIOH MANAGERS
IT CORPORATION
SDGI S0598 Rr«» 9203S332.9203S347
NESTION MANAGERS
INORGANICS ANALYSIS" '" '"" "*"*«"
SDGI S059* RFNI 9203S317.9203S332.9203S347
HESTIOH MANAGERS
HYDROCARBONS ANALYSIS
RFH» 9203S3S3.9203S3G4,9203S399
HESTIOH MANAGERS
LABORATORY REPORT TOR MCB CAMP PEHDLETON
.
"!»"*" HVDROCAR80HS AHALYStS
SOI72 RFH( 9203S471.S2D3S4IJ
0043
05/13/94
04/10/92
00166
02.2
HESTION HANACERS
IT CORPORATION
OD2S
HD06II
DATA
0037
LABORATORY REPORT FOR MCB CAMP PEKDLETON
GC\MS SEMIVOLATILES ANALYSIS
SDGII SOS17 RFWB 9203S362.9203S363.9203S364
CAHP PENDLETON
HYDROCARBONS ANALYSIS
RFHH 9203S471.9203S483
SOLVENTS
000655
OS/11/94
04/10/92
00166
02.2
HESTION MAHACgRS
IT CORPORAT10H
«•
isss
SDG» S0636 RFV» 9203S350, S203S3S1
ADHIN RECORD
HERBICIDE
0036
— v-! VOLATILE ANALYSIS
SDGII SOSS7 RFH» 9203S352.9203S374
(-
-------
DATE - 08/24/99
UIC No,
MCB CM
. DOC.NO. i PRC.DATE FROM
HP PENDLETON ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD FILE INDEX (SORTED BY
DOC. DATE) PAGE
DOCWENT.TYPE... JDOC.DATE FROM. SIGNATURE
CONTR/C
APPROX.
M006S1
DATA
32699
0212
DATA
003S
DATA
0093
DATA
0049
DATA
0069
DATA
0021
DATA
0435
DATA
0410
DATA
32717
0215
DATA
32717
1379
SUID..NO.. ICTO.NO.. TO
.1. OF. PAGES EPA.CATI TO. SIGNATURE
000639 : 05/13/94 CH2M HILL
j 04/11/92
,90166 MCB CAMP PENDLETON
02.2
000672 OS/13/94 HESTION MANAGERS
04/13/92
00166 IT CORPORATION
.01.2
04/13/92
00166.
.02.2
04/14/92
,00166 IT CORPORATION
02.2
000670 OS/13/94 HESTION MANAGERS
04/14/92,
00186 IT CORPORATION
02.2
04/14/92
00166 IT CORPORATION
02.2
000683 OS/13/94 ROY F. HESTION INC
D4/U/92
00166 IT CORPORATION
02.2
04/14/92
001S6 IT CORPORATION
02.2
04/15/92
00166 MCB CAMP PENDLETON
02.2
04/15/92 PEGGY A. NORTON
00166 IT CORPORATION
02.2 DAVE MARK
. : SUBJECT .,
DATA VALIDATION REPORT FOR MCB CAMP PENDLETON
VOLATILES
LABORATORY REPORT FOR MCB CAMP PENDLETON
GCVMS SEMIVOLATILES ANALYSIS
SDG» S0636 RFH» 92D3S3S0.9203S3S1
LABORATROY REPORT FOR HCB CAMP PENDLETON
METALS
LABORATORY REPORT FOR HCB CAMP PENDLETON
OROANOCHLORINE PESTICIDES AND FCBa ANALYSIS
SDGI S0598 RFHI 9203SJ17.9203S332. 9203S347
LABORATORY REPORT FOR MCB CAMP PENDLETOH
INORGANICS ANALYSIS 9203S399
SDCfi S0617 RFHK 9203S362.92D3S3£},9203S364,9203S379
LABORATORY REPORT FOR HCB CAMP PENDLETON
GC\MS VOLATILES ANALYSIS
SOCK S0848 RFH» 9203S463
ANALYTICAL DATA PACKAGE FOR MCB CAMP PENDLETON
ANALYSIS
RFHW 9204SSBO
ANALYTICAL DATA PACKAGE FOR MCB CAMP PENDLETON
ANALYSIS
RFH» 9204SS71
DATA VALIDATION REPORT FOR MCB CAMP PENDLETON
VOLATILES
DATA VALIDATION REPORT FOR MCB CHIP PENDLETON
SEMIVOLATILES (missing pagea 00001 -00021BI
CLASSIFICATION KEYWORDS ...Site Location
ADMIN RECORD HERBICIDE
WATER
PESTICIDES
ADMIN RECORD SOLVENTS " "
ADMIN RECORD METALS "" ~~
ADMIN RECORD PESTICIDES — —
PCH
ADMIN RECORD TOO
ADMIN RECORD VOC " ~
ADMIN RECORD DATA ~
ADMIN RECORD DATA ' "' —
ADMIN RECORD VOC " •
ADMIN RECORD SOLVENTS ~ "
-------
DATE - 08/24/58
"1C Ha. DOC.KO.
DOCUHEHT.TypB...
OWTR/CU1D..NO..
APPROX.K.OF.PAOES
•••••••«••....„„,
H00681 00065*
DATA
0053
PRC.DATE
DOC. DATE
CTO.HO. .
EPA.CATI
HCB
FROM .........
FROH.SIGNATURE.'
TO .............. '
TO. SIGNATURE.' .'.'".'
«•««•»...„..„,„.
ADHIKISTRATIVE RECORD „« INOEX (SORTBD BV ooc. CATE,
PAGE .
CLASSIFICATION KCT WORDS
••«""«•-—.«...............
AWIN RECORD SOLVENTS
•slte Location
" SUBJECT
05/13/91
01/16/92
OOH6
02.2
HESTIOM HAHAOERS
IT CORPORATION
H00681000659
DATA
OS/13/94
Of/16/92
00166
02.2
KANAGER
IT CORPORATION
ACMIN RECORD voc
S059. RFNV 9203S317.9203S332.9203S347
05/13/91
04/16/92
001««
02.2
HKUTIOH MANAGERS
IT CORPORATION
05/13/94
04/17/92
001C6
02.2
HESTIOH HAHAOERS
IT CORPORATION
RECORD SOLVENTS
ADMIN RECORD" DATA
SDOI S0848 RFVI 9303S163
FOR HOB
OS/13/94
04/17/92
00166
02.2
ROV F. HESTION IHC
IT CORPORATION
MOOSBl 000685
DATA
OS/13/S
04/H/92
001«
02.2
F.; HESTIOH IMC
IT CORPORATION '
9204S616
HATRU7 WATER AND SOIL
002323
DATA
ooooooooooooooo
0005
6v F. HESTON
' CAMP PENDLETON
SOUTHWEST DIVISION
M00681 000645
DATA
05/13/94
04/20/92
00166
02.2
M00681 000646
DATA
0022
M00681 000617
DATA
0026
OS/13/94"
04/20/92
00166
02.2
HBSTION HAHAGERS
IT CORPORATIOH
04/20/92
00166
02.2
I MANAGERS
IT CORPORATION
*OMIN RECORD
M3MIH RECORD
-------
DATE - 0»/24/9«
UIC (to. DOC.BO.
DOCUMENT. TYPE...
CONTK/GUID..NO..
PRC.DATE FROM
DOC.DATE FROM.SIGNATURE
CTO.NO.. TO..
MCB CAMP PENDLETON ADHINISTRATIVE RECORD FILE INDEX (SORTED BY DOC. DATE)
APPROX.«.OF.PAGES EPA.CATH TO.SIGNATURE
...SUBJECT.
CLASSIFICATION KEY WORDS
PACE - 13
• Site Location
M00681 000660 OS/13/94 HESTION MANAGERS
DATA 01/20/92
00166 IT CORPORATION
0065 02.2
LABORATORY REPORT FOR MCB CAMP PENDLETON
ORGANOPHOSPHOROUS PESTICIDES ANALYSIS
SDGd S0636 HFH» 9203S3SD,9203S351
M006H 0006S1 05/13/94 HESTION MANAGERS
DATA 04/20/92
00166 IT CORPORATION
0107 02.2
LABORATORY REPORT FOR MCB CAMP PENDLETON
ORGANOPHOSPHOROUS PESTICIDES ANALYSIS
SDG» S0657 RFHK 9203S35Z,92D3S374
ADMIN REC3RD PESTICIDES
ADMIN REOiRDPESTICIDES
DATA
0007
05/13/9* HESTION MANAGERS
04/20/92
00166 IT CORPORATION
: 02.2
DATA VALIDATION RETORT FOR HCB CAMP PENDLETOH'
MATRIX: SOIL t WATER PARAMETER: VOLATILES
LAB: ROY F. KESTON SDG« SU26
AOMIN RECI
RD HATER
MOOSil 000675 05/13/94 HESTION MANAGERS
DATA 04/20/J2 '
00166 IT CORPORATION
0006 02.2
DATA VALIDATION REPORT FOR MCB CAMP PENDLETON
MATRIX: SOIL t MATER PARAMETER: SEHIVOLATHES
LAB: ROY F. HESTON SDGI S1126
ADMIN KECpRD SOLVENTS
HATER
M00681 000676 OS/13/94 HESTION MANAGERS
DATA 04/20/92
00166 IT CORPORATION
0006 02.2
DATA VALIDATION REPORT FOR MCB CAMP PENDLETOH
MATRIX: SOIL & HATER PARAMETER: ORGANOCHLORINE
PESTICIDBSXPCBs LAB: ROY F. HESTON SDGI S1126
AOMIN RECCRD
PESTICIDES
tCB
HATER
M006U00232007/21/94ROY F. KESTON
DATA 04/20/92
000000000000000 00000 HCB CAMP PENDLETON
0007 02.2
MATRIX:HATER AND SOlT '
PARAMETERS: TAL METALS AND MOLYBDENUM
SDG: 51126
ADMIN RECORD
HATER
METALS
SOUTHWEST DIVISION
M006B1
DATA
OOS2
000678
OS/13/94 ESB
04/21/92
00166
02.2
LABORATROY REPORT FOR MCB CAMP PENDLETOH
ANALYSIS
ADMIN HECOftD.DATA
DATA
OOS4
000663 05/13/94 NESTIOH MANAGERS
04/22/92
00166 IT CORPORATION
02.2
LABORATORY REPORT FOR MCB CAMP PENDLETON
ORGANOPHOSPHOROUS PESTICIDES b PCB» ANALYSIS
SDGK S0636 RFH» 9203S350,9203S351
ADMIN RECORD
PESTICIDES
PCS
M00681 000664 05/U/94 HESTION MANAGERS
DATA 04/22/92
00166 IT CORPORATION
0042 02.2
LABORATORY REPORT FOR MCB CAMP PENDLETON
GCVMS VOLATILES ANALYSIS
SDG» S0617 RFX« 92035362.910)S]t],920)3364,9201S199
ADMIN RECOID
VOC
M00681 000677 OS/U/94 HESTION MANAGERS
DATA 04/22/92
00166 IT CORPORATION
0042 02.2
LABORATROY REPORT FOR MCB CAMP PEt
. CHLORINATED HERBICIDES ANALYSIS
SDG0 S06S7 RFH» 9203S352.9203S374
RECOID HERBICIDE
-------
DATE - 01/J4/9S
UIC Ko. DOC. HO. PRC.DATE
DOCWtEWT.TYPE... DOC.DATE
COHTR/GUID. .RO.. CTO.HO..
APPROJf.S.OF.PAGES EPA.CATB
H006S1 000680
DATA
0060
OS/13/94
04/J2/93
0016S
02.2
FROM
FROM.SICNATURB.
''
ESB
ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD FILE INDEX (SORTED BY DOC.
DATE)
SUMECr CLASSI
' • t
u MCB CAHP
HERBICIDES ANALYSIS
SDG» SOSJ7 RFH» 9203S363. 92035364,92035399
ADHIH
'ICATIOH KEY WORDS
IECORO HERBICIDES
MOOfin 002284
DATA
000000000000000
000$
SoolTi000666
DATA
0056
07/20/94
04/22/92
00000
02.2
05/13/94
04/23/S2
0016S
02.2
'ROY F. WESTOtT
HCB CAHP PENDLETON
HESTIOH MANAGERS
JT CORPORATION
MATRIX: WATER AND SOIL "
fl CLP METALS AMD MOLYBDENUM
** CM1P
SDGJ SO«S7 RFH* 9203S352, 9203S374
ADMIN RjBCORD
AOMIN
05/13/9*
04/JJ/92
00166
02.2
HESTION MANAGERS
IT CORPORATION
F01t B WP PENDLgfON
IHORGAHICS HOHCLP ANALYSIS ™BULtroN
SDO« S0848 RFH» 9203S463.9203S447
ADMIN RI CORD JOG
*•
SEHIVOLATILE ANALYSIS
SDCB S0657 RFim 9203S352.9203S374
M00681
DATA
0042
05/13/94
04/23/92
0016C
02.2
HESTIOH MAWAGERS
IT CORPORATION
<•«.._ • PEHDLETON
VOLATILES ANALYSIS
SDGB S0909 RFWB 9204S48S,9204SSOI
0026
OS/12/94
04/28/92
00166
02.2
WESTION MANAGERS
MCB CAMP PENDLETOW
VOLATILES ANLYSIS EDGB 80952
RFWB 9204S50S
DATA
0028
04/28/J2
00146
02.2
MCB CAMP PENDLETON
REPORT FOR HC3 CAMP FaroLETON IT CORP
PAGE
Loc«tion ......
WATER
METALS
IOG
SOUTHWEST DIVISION
ADMIN RE -ORD VOC~
-------
DATE - 08/J4/98 .
UIC NO. DOC.NO. PRC.DATE FROM ** """ M"OUWO" "»»»S™»VE RECORD FILE INDEX (SORTED BY
DOCUMENT.TYPE... DOC.DATE FROH.SICNATUHB....
CONTR/GUID..NO.. CTO.NO. . TO
APPROX.m OF. PAGES EPA. CATC TO; SIGNATURED '. ', '.'. ','. . ','.
"«««.««-.-»«-•«••«..»•......,..,.„,.„..„...,_,,
NOOM1 000601 05/13/94 HESTION MANAGERS
DATA 04/28/92
00166 MCB CAMP PENDLETON
0011 02.2
M00681 002J13 07/20/94 ROY F. MESTON "
DATA 04/38/92
000000000000000 00000 MCB CAMP PENDLETON
0006 03.2
M00691 000587 05/12/94 HESTION MANAGERS
DATA 04/29/92
00166 MCB CAMP PENDLSTON
0073 02.2
DATA 04/20/93
ooooooooooooooa ooooo HCB CAHP PBHOLETOH
0001 02.3
DATA 04/30/92
OOlSfi MCB CAMP PEHDLBTON
0052 02.2
DATA 04/30/92
0016S KCB CAMP PKNDLSTON
0007 02.2
DATA 04/30/92
00166 MCB CAMP PENDLETON
0006 02.2
DATA 04/30/92
0016S HCB CAMP PENDLETON
0004 02.2
DATA 04/30/92
HCB CAMP PENDLETOH
0006 02.2
M00661 001328 05/31 /94 ' — -— *•
DATA 01/30/92
HCB CAMP PENDLETON
0007 03.2
SUBJECT
DATA VALIDATION REPORT FOR MCB CAMP PBNDLETON
MATRIX: SOIL t HATER PARAMETER: SEMIVOLATILES
LAB: BOY F. HESTON SDG* S11S6
MATRIX: SOIL.HATER
PARAMETERS: VOLAMLES
SDG: S1198
LABORATORY REPORT FOR HCB CAMP PEWDLETON IT CORP
INORGANICS ANALYSIS SDGS SOS09 RFH» 9204S48S, 9204S501
MATRIX: HATER AND SOIL "
PARAMETERS: CLP METALS AND MOLYBDENUM
SDO: S11IB
LABORATORY RSPORT FOR MCB CAMP PENDLETON IT CORP
OROANOPHOSPHOROUS PESTICIDES ANALYSIS
SDG8 S06S7 RFHR 9203S3S2, 9203S374
DATA VALA1DATION REPORT FOR MCB CAMP PENDLETON
MATRIX: SOIL t HATER PARAMETER: ORGANOCHLORINE
PESTICIDlSS\PCB» LAB: ROY F. HESTON SDG* S1197
DATA VALIDATION REPORT FOR HCB CAMP PENDLBTON
MATRIX: SOIL t HATER PARAMETER: VOLATILES
LAB: ROY F. HESTON SDGH S1197
um» VALAIDATION REPORT FOR MCB CAMP PENDLETON
MATRIX: SOIL I HATER PARAMETER: SEMIVOLATILES
LAB: ROY F. HESTON SDGK S1197
DMA VALIDATION REPORT HCB CAMP PENDLETON
MATRIX: HATER. SOIL PARAMETERS: VOLATILES
LAB: ROY F. HESTON SDGI S1197
DATA VALIDATION REPORT MCB CAMP PENDLETON ~"
MATRIX: WATER, SOIL PARAMETERS: ORGANOCHLORINE
PESTICIDES PCB» LAB: ROY F. HESTON SDG» SH97
DOC. DATE)
CLASSIFIC
...........
ADMIN REC
ADMIN REC
ADMIN REC
ADMIN RECC
ADMIN RECC
ADMIN RECC
ADMIN RECO
ADHIH RECO
ADMIN RECO]
ADMIN RECOI
PACE • 15
"ION KEYHORDS ...Site Location..
»D HATER
SOLVENTS
'HD VOLATILES SOUTHWEST DIVISION
KU METALS SOUTHWEST DIVISION
RO PHSTICIDES ~ ~ ~
M) HATKH ~ ' — " — —
PESTICIDES
PCB
VOC
D HATER ~
SOLVENTS
ID HATER ——
VOLATILES
D HATER ~ —
PESTICIDES
PCB
-------
DATE • 08/24/JB
UICHo. DOC. NO. PHC.DATB FROM... "
^™^:"fE--- DOC.DATE FROM. SIGNATURE,
COWTR/GUID. .NO.. CTO.HO. TO
APPHOX. I .OF. PAGES EPA.CATI
PENDLETOH ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD FILE INDEX (SORTED BY DOC. DATE.
CLASSIFICATION KEY HORDS
PACE -
Site ....... Location ......
DATA VALIDATION REPORT HCB CAMP
H00681 002322
DATA
000000000000000
0005
^•7/21/94 ROY F. HESToiT
04/30/92
00000 MCB CAMP PENDLETON
02.2
HMH1J(1 HATER AND SOIL
ABHIN RECORD HATER
METALS
SOUTHWEST DIVISION
MOOSB1
DATA
32452
0079
HOOfiil
DATA
334S2
0148
H00681
DATA
0014
000577
05/12/94 CH2M HILL
05/01/92 PEGGA. NORTON
00166 IT CORPORATION
02.2 DAVE MARK
05/12/94 OHM HILL
05/01/92 PEGGA. NORTON
00166 IT CORPORATION
02.2 DAVE MARK
INORGANICS REF» 32510,32520
_
PESTICIDES. PCB. HERBICIDES. TFH
000590
05/12/94
05/04/92
00166
02.2
HESTION MANAGERS
MCB CAMP PENDLETON
MBORATORY HEPOHT FOR MCB CAMP PENDLETON IT
OHOANOPHOSPHOROUS PESTICIDES ANALYSIS
SDG« S0848 RFM» 9203S463
OS/12/94
05/04/92
00166
02.2
HESTIOH MANAGERS
HCB CAMP PENDLETON
ORATORY REPOHT FOR HCB CAMP mminai
ADMIN RECORD TPH
PENDLETON IT CORP.
SEHIVOLATILES ANALYSIS
SDG» S0909 RPW» 92045485.92048501
HESTION MANAGERS
HCB CAMP PENDLETON
ADMIN RECORD IOC
SDG« S0952 RFW« 9204S506
ENSECQ CAL LAB
MARK BECHTHOLD
HESTION. INC.
LYNDA KELLY
ADMIN RECORD HXCDD
H00681
DATA
J55H9
0914
000609
OS/13/94
05/04/92
00166
02.2
CH2M HILL
PEGGY A. NORTON
.IT CORPORATION
DAVE MARKLY
ANALYTICAL DATA MCB CAMP PENDLETON
ORGANIC AND INORGANIC PARAMETERS
ADMIN RECORD foe"
-------
DATE - 08/24 /9«
HCB CAMP
UIC No. DOC.NO. PRC.DATE FROM
DOCOHEHT.TYPE. . . DOC.DATE FROM.SIGNATURE! '.'.'.'.'
CONTR/GUID..NO. . CTO.NO.. TO.
APPROX.H. OF. PAGES EPA.CATK TO. SIGNATURE'.'..'..'.'..
ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD FILE INDEX (SORTED BY DOC. DATE!
SUBJECT
PACE - 17
CLASSIFICATION KEYWORDS
MO.6.1 002061 06/29/94 INTERNATIONAL TECH CONSTRUCTION REPRESENTATIVES REPORT FOR CAMP PEHDLETON AOMIN RECORD
MCB CAMP PEWDLETON
0012
166
'01.2
DATA
•Site Location
5 SOUTHWEST DIVISION
6
9
OOOS96
0029
OS/12/94 HESTION MANAGERS
OS/05/92
•00166 MCB CAMP PENDLETON
02.2
SDQB S09S2 RFUtt 9204S506
M00681
DATA
0021
OOOS98 OS/12/94 HESTION MANAGERS
OS/OS/92
00166 HCB CAMP PENDLETON
02 .2
LABORATORY REPORT FOR MCS CAMP PENDLETON IT CORP.
TOTAL PURGEABLE PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS ANALYSIS
SDGB S1105 RfWi 9204S622, 9204S62J
Moosn
DATA
3SS69
0615
DATA
000608
001331
05/13/94
05/05/92
00166
02.2
05/31/94
OS/OS/92
CH2H HIM,
PEOGY A. NORTON
IT CORPORATION
DAVE HARKLY
ANALYTICAL DATA MCB CAMP PENDLETON ~
ORGANIC AND INORGANIC PARAMETERS
DATA VALIDATION REPORT MCB CAMP PENDLBTON
oooc
02.2
MCB CAMP PENDLETON
M00681002327 01/21/94 ROY F. HESTON
DATA OS/05/92
OOOOQOOOOOOOOOO 00000 MCB CAMP PENDLETON
0005 02.2
M00681OOOS9705/12/94HESTION MANAGERS
DATA OS/07/92
00166 MCB CAMP PENDLETON
0039 02.2
M0068100060505/13/94 WESTION MANAGERS
DATA OS/07/92
00166 HCB CAMP PENDLETON
003S 02.2
24
GROUP A
OU1
"WTH5B - SOLVED
ADMIN RECORD - TDlT
ADHIH RECOBli
RECORD
ADMIM RECOUP - 5TSS
SOUTHWEST DIVISION
SDG«
RFNfl 9203S463
DATA VALAIDATION
SDG* 50909 RFHtt 9204S4BS
M00681
DATA
0031
000599
05/12/94 HESTIOH MANAGERS
OS/0»/92
00166 MCB CAMP PENDLETON
02.2
REPORT FOR MCB CAMP PENDLETON IT CORP
TOTAL PURGEABLE PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS ANALYSIS '
SDOB S0952 RFH* 9204S506
ADMIN RECORD - TPH
RECORD TPH.
DATA
0030
OS/08/92
00166 MCB CAMP PENDLETON
02.2
LABORATORY REPORT FOR HCB CAMP PEHDLETOH IT CORP"
CCV.MS VOLATILES ANLYSIS '
SDGI S1105 RFH« 9204S622.9204S623
RECORD 555
KfcCOKD VOC
-------
DATE - OI/24/S8
UIC Ho. DOC.HO. PRC.DATE FROM ^ ^ PEHOLEIOH "MNttnWTIVB RECORD FILE INDEX (SORTED BY DOC. DATE)
DOCUMENT. TYPE..
.CONTH/CUID..NO.
APPROX.I.OF.PAG
HOOCH 000606
DATA
0059
M00681 002062
DATA
0008
M006B1 000579
DATA
32510
0275
DATA
32521
0372
H00681 000586
DATA
32521
0384
DATA
0004
H006B1 000580
DATA
32531
0130
M00681 0005B1
DATA
32S76
0229
. DOC. DATE FROH. SIGNATURE
. CTO.HO.. TO
••"•••*•*•••••••••«•»•>*••••••*.»..»
05/13/91 WESTION HANACERS
05/08/92
00l« HCB CAMP PEHDLETOH
02.2
06/29/94 INTERNATIONAL TECjT"
OS/08/92
166 HCB CAHP PEHDLETON
01.2
05/12/94 CH2M HILL '
05/11/92 PBGGA. NORTOM
00166 IT CORPORATION
02.2 DAVE MARK
05/12/94 CH2M HILL
05/12/92 PEGGA. NORTON
OOUS IT CORPORATION
02.2 DAVE HARK
05/12/94 CH2M HILL
OS/12/92 PEGGA. NORTON
00166 IT CORPORATION
02.2 DAVE HARK
05/12/92
16S HCB CAHP PENDLETON
01.2
05/12/94 CH2M HILL
05/13/92 PEGGA. NORTON
OOISS IT CORPORATIOH
02.2 DAVE HARK
05/12/94 CH2K HILL
05/13/92 PEGOA. NORTON
00166 IT CORPORATIOH
02.2 DAVE HARK
SUBJECT CLASSIPIC»Tirvi
ORGAHOPHOSPHOROUS PESTICIDES ANDCpCB,PENDLET™ **"" RECORD
SDG» S0617 RFHI 9203S362. 9203S363, 923S364. 9203S399
CONSTRUCTION REPRESENTATIVES REPORT FOR CAHP PENDLEToii ADH1H RECORD
LABORATORY REPORT FOR HCB CAHP PENDLETON IT CORP ADMIM BECOHrT
OROANICS. PESTICIDES. PCB. HERBICIDES, TFH
LABORATORY nrPfiBT rnp urn
INORGANICS >-««DLErON IT CORP. ADHIH RECORD
— —
c=cT PmTDEs0: ^ *"»«- -
CONSTRUCTION REPRESENTATIVES REPORT FOR CAMP PENOLETON ADMIN RECORD
ORGANTcrPEsSclDEs! S^SSS™^ ^ "*"" ^^
LABORATORY REPORT FOR HCB CAHP"PENDLETON IT rosp ir^r., n,^..
ORGANICS. PESTICIDES. PCB. HERBICWK. ?FH *""" ^^^
CHORDS ...Siee Location
PESTICIDES
- PCB
DAT* S SOUTHWEST DIVISION
6
9
24
GROUP A
OU1
PESTICIDES
PCB-
HERBICIDE
TFH
PESTICIDES ' —
PCB
HERBICIDE
TFH
DATA ' SOUTHWEST DIVISION
9
24
GROUP A
GUI
PESTICIDES
PCB
HERBICIDE
TFH
PESTICIDES ~—
PCB
HERBICIDE
PAGE . it
TPH
-------
DATE - 08/24/98
UIC No. DOC. NO
DOCUMENT. TYPE..
CONTR/GUID. .NO.
APPROX.K.OF.PAGI
HOOS31 000562
DATA
32576
0100
M00681 000583"
DATA
32531
0039
H006B1 OOOS84
DATA
32520
0368
M006B1 000592
DATA
0049
M006I1 oTll83
DATA
32520
0271
H00681 002064
DATA
0004
M00681 000569
DATA
32567
0340
H00681 000570
DATA
32594
0176
KCB Q
. PRC. DATE FROM
. DOC.DATB FROM. SIGNATURE
. CTO.NO. . TO
3S EPA.CATH TO. SIGNATURE. .
05/12/94 CH2M HILL
05/1J/92 PEGGA. NORTON
00166 IT CORPORATION
02.2 DAVE HARK
05/12/S4 CH2N HILL
05/13/92 PEGGA. NORTON
00166 IT CORPORATION
02.2 DAVE MARK
05/12/94 CH2M HILL
OS/13/92 PEGGA. NORTON
00166 IT CORPORATION
02.2 DAVE HARK
05/12/84 HESTIOH MANAGERS
OS/13/92
00166 MCB CAMP PENDLETOH
02.2
OS/13/92 PEGGY A. NORTON
00166 IT CORPORATION
02.2 DAVE HARK
05/13/92
166 MCB CAMP PENDLETON
01.2
OS/12/94 CH2M HILL "
OS/14/92 PEGGA. NORTON
0016S IT CORPORATION
02.2 DAVE MARK
05/12/94 CH2M HILL
OS/14/S2 PEGGA. NORTON
00166 IT CORPORATION
02.2 DAVE HARK
WP PENDLETON ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD FILE INDEX (SORTED BV DOC. DATE)
..SUBJECT CLASSIFICATION
LABORATORY REPORT FOR MCB CAMP PENDLETON IT CORP ADHIH nemon
ORGANICS. PESTICIDES, PCB. HERBICIDES TFH REC°RD
REF» 32587.32594
wScS.REroRT ro" MC" CWP ""WHOM IT CORP. ADMIN HECORD '
LABQnfc-ynqy REPORT FOR MCD CAMP PEJJDLETQH TT i\wu
OBfT>NTf C OFCTTf*Tni?e nr>r* L>Ci»urt 11 L.TJKI*. ADMIN RECORD
LABORATORY REPORT FOR MCB CAMP PENDLETON IT CORP ADMIN RECOBD —
CC\MS VOLATILE ANALYSIS RECORD
SDGI S112S RFH» 9204S63S.9204S646
ANALYTICAL DATA FOR MCB CAMP PENDtETON ADHIH RECORD
VOLATILES, SWIVOLATltES. PESTICIDES PCBa
TFH. HERBICIDES
L^STHUCTION REraESENTATIVES REPORT FOR CAMP PENDLETON ADftlN RECORD
nnf.uV "'•'"Hi IUH HLH CAHP H.WULETON IT CORP. ADMIN RECORD
UKORNICS, VOLATILES. SEMI VOLATILES, PEST1CIDES\PCB«
LABORATORY REPOBT FOB urto — ~ — "~~" ~~ ~~ — — —
TFH, HERBICIDES ' ZLES< PESTICII)ES\PCB«
KEY HORDS
PESTICIDES
PCS
HERBICIDE
TFH
IOG
PESTICIDES
PCB
HERBICIDE
TFH
VOC
VOLATILES
SEHIVOLAT1LES
PESTICIDES
PCB
TFH
HERBICIDE
DATA
SOLVENTS
PESTICIDES
PCB
TFH
HERBICIDES
SOLVENTS
PESTICIDES
PCB
TFH
HERBICIDE
PAGE - 19
...Site.
.Locat ion.
6
9
24
GROUP A
OUl
-------
DATE - OI/24/J«
UIC Ho. DOC.NO.
OOCUHENT.TYPe...
COHTR/CUID..NO.. .
APPROX.t.oF.PAOES EPA.CATi
MC.DATE FROH
DOC.DATE FKOM SIGNATUHE
CTO.NO.. TO
°HP
ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD TILE INDEX .SORTED Br DOC DATE,
SUBJECT ........................... CLASSIFICATION
PAGE - 20
KEY HORDS
• Site Location
HOOE81 002065
DATA
0004
OS/29/94
OS/H/92
166
01.2
IHTERHATIOHAL TECH CONSTRUCTION REPRESSES REPORT FOR CAHP PENDLETON
MC8 CAMP PENDLETON
RECORD
LORATORt REPORT FOH HCB
sssr
HESTOH MANAGERS
LABORATORY REPORT
MCH CAHP PEMDLETOM IT
SSSSI
LABORATORY REPORT FOR MCB CAMP
CH2H HILL
PEOGA. NORTON
IT CORPORATIOJJ
DAVE HARK
REPRESENTATIVES REPORT FOR CAHP PEHDLETOH ADMIN RECORD
tflBORATORY REPORT FOR MCB CAHP PENDLETON IT
-. -"'"* L*
9204S622.9204SS23
-------
DATE - 08/24/98
"1C So. DOC.NO. P|
DOCUMENT. TYPE. DOC DATE CBnu
OWR/GUJD..NO.. CID.'NO ™ GNATUHE----
™:!:£:^f!.™;^ %"*&£&::::::
SUBJECT
HOOS«l 000556
DATA
003)
05/1J/94
OS/19/93
00166
02.2
DOC. DATE)
CLASSIFICATION KEY WORDS
RECORD SOLVENTS
PAGE .
21
Site...
Location...
5o"23s»
DATA
ooooooooooooooo
0020
Soom ooosir
DATA
0276
DATA
OJ76
OOOSST
M00««l 000558
DATA
0080
05/12/94
05/21/92
OOlCg
02.2
05/12/94
05/21/92
00166
02.2
OS/12/947
05/23/52
00166
02.2
»
RECORD"
ADMIN RECORD
PESTICIDET
-------
DATE - 01/24/51
OIC HO. DOC.NO. PRC.DATE FRC«
35ESES:: Sg:5S*
APPROX.f.OP.PAGES BPA.CATI TO .'siGNATORE.
PENDLETON ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD FILE INDEX (SORTED BY DOC.
~ SUBJECT
DATE)
M006J1 000562 OS/12/94 HESTOH MANAGERS
DATA 05/22/92
0030
00166
02.2
CAMP PENDLETON
CLASSIFICATION KEY HOHDS
SSSSI S^StSSr11 " C°RP- *""• RECORD ««««"
SDO» S110S RFMI 9204S616.9204S622
PAGE ... 22
.•s«te Location
ZSK. = «*"«•• «"«W«C». AM.N RECORD
M00681
DATA
32948
0613
N00681
DATA
32696
0425
NOOE81
DATA
32732
0292
OOOS71
000512
OOOS7S
M00681
DATA
0494
H00601
DATA
0029
000993 OS/18/94 HE
OS/23/92
001(6 IT
02,2
000568 05/12/94 BE
OS/26/92
00166 MCI
02.2
OS/12/94 CH2M HIM,
05/33/92 PEOOA. NORTON
00166 IT CORPORATION
02.2 DAVE MARK
^5/12/94 CH2H HILL
05/22/92 PEOOA. NORTON
00166 IT CORPORATION
02.2 DAVE MARK
HESTON MANAGERS
CORPORATION
INORGANICS
'CORp;ADMIN RECORD
LABORATORY REPORT FOR HCB CAMP
LABORATORY REPORT FOR HCB CAMP PENDLETON IT CORP
'?" PETOOLEWI HYDROCARBON!
RFH« 9205S764.9S05S771
002$
HESTON MANAGERS
IT CORPORATION
LABORATORY REPORT FOR MOT CAMP PENDLETON
M00681
DATA
0046
M006tl
DATA
0039
OOOB46 OS/18/94
05/2S/92
00166
02.2
000847 OS/18/94 "
OS/26/92
00166
02.2
HESTON MANAGERS
IT CORPORATION
NESTON MANAGERS
IT CORPORATIOB
"LMORATOHY REPORT FOR HCB CAMP PENDLETON
PETOOLEU» HYDROCARBONS ANALYSIS
9204S662.9204S676.9204S714
MBORATORY REPORT FOR HCB CAMP PENDIETON
-------
DATE - 08/24/99
MCB CAMP PENDLETON ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD FILE IIJOEX (SORTED at DOC. DATE!
PAGE - 23
DOCUMENT. TYPE... DOC. DATE
CONTR/GUID..NO.. CTO.NO. .
APPRO* .». OF . PAGES: EPA . CAT»
HOOtei
DATA
0042
DATA
0026
DATA
12704
0443
DATA
32734
0697
DATA
3272$
03(7
DATA
32699
004 «
DATA
32726
0670
DATA
0044
DATA
0040
DATA
000(49
OS/H/94
05/26/92
00166
02.2
OS/26/92
00166
02.2
OS/26/92
00166
02.2
OS/2S/92
00166
02.2
05/11/94
05/26/92
00166
02.2
05/26/92
00166
02.2
05/26/92
00166
02.2
05/27/92
00166
02.2
05/28/92
00166
02.2
05/18/94
OS/28/92
FROM. SIGNATURE
TO. . .
TO. SIGNATURE
HESTON MANAGERS
IT CORPORATION.
HESTON MANAGERS
IT CORPORATION
IT CORPORATION
IT CORPORATION
HESTON MANAGERS
IT CORPORATION
HESTOH MANAGERS
IT CORPORATION
IT CORPORATION
HESTON MANAGERS
IT CORPORATION
IT CORPORATION
HESTON MANAGERS
SUBJECT
LABORATORY REPORT TOR HCB CAMP PENDLETON
GC\HS SEMI VOLATILES ANALYSIS
SDG« S1126 RFNI 9204SS3S.9204S646
LABORATORY REPORT FOR MCB CAMP PENDLETON
GCVHS SKHIVOLATILES ANALYSIS
SDGS S110S HFH» 9204S622.9204S623
ANALYTICAL DATA FOR MCB CAMP PENDLETON
SEMIVOLATILES
ANALYTICAL DATA FOR MCB CAHP PENDLETON
VOLATILES. SEMIVOLATILES
ANALYTICAL DATA FOR HCB CAMP PENDLETON
VOLATtLES, SEMI VOLATILES, TFH. PESTICIDES
ANALYTICAL DATA FOR MCB CAMP PENDLETON
METALS, INORGANICS
ANALYTICAL DATA FOR MCB CAHP PENDLETON """
METALS, INORGANICS
LABORATORY REPORT FOR MCB CAMP PENDLETON
OC\MS SEMIVOLATILES ANALYSIS
SDGB SUSS RFH» 9204S662.9204SS76.9204S714
LABORATORY REPORT FOR MC8 CAMP PENDLETON
TOTAL EXTRACTABLE PETROLEUM HYDROCARBON ANALYSIS
SDGD Sllia RFW« 9204S715,9205S721,9205S754
LABORATORY REPORT FOR MCB CAMP PENDLETON
CCVMS SEHIVOLATILES ANALYST!:
. . . . CLASSIFICATION
ADMIN RECORD
ADMIN RECORD
ADMIN RECORD
ADMIN RECORD
ADMIN RECORD
ADMIN RECORD
ADMIN RECORD
ADMIN RECORD
ADMIN RECORD
ADMIN RECORD
KEYWORDS ...Site Location
SEMIVOLATILES
SEMIVOLATILES " ~
SEMIVOLATILES •
VOLATILES —
SEHIVOLATILES
. VOLATILES —
SEHIVOLATILES
TFH
PESTICIDES
METALS
IOG
METALS '
IOG
SEMIVOLATILES " '
SEMIVOLATILES '
0041
00166 IT CORPORATION
02.2
SDG» S1US RFV» 9204St62.9204S676,«204S714
-------
DATE - 01/24/91
UICKo. DOC.HO. PRC.DATE FROM "^ "^ fEmi£mt ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD FILE INDEX
DOCUMENT/TYPE... OOC.DATE FROM.SICNATUSE!'.'.'.'.'.
COHTR/CUID. .KO.. CTO.NO TO
AmoX:».OF.PAGES EPA.CAT» ToistGNATURE SUBJECT
-«::::
HOOSBl
DATA
32703
0867
DATA
0123
001012 05/H/94 HESTON MANAGERS
OS/28/92
001SS IT CORPORATION
02.2 DAVE HARK
°°05S5 05/18/94 NESTON MANAGERS'
05/29/92
IT CORPORATION
FOR MCB CWIP
. PESTICIDES
(SORTED BY DOC. DATE)
CLASSIPICATIOH KEY HORDS
ADHIH RECORD SEHIVOLATILES
ADMIN RECORD PESTICIDES
tHK -
.Location..
ANALVTICAI. DATA FOR
SEHJVOUTIIES.
CAMP
ADHIH RECORD
SEMIVOLATILES
VOLATILES
TFH
MBBMl 000996 OS/18/9* HBSTON MANAGERS
* 05/29/92
HERBICIDE
MWtYTICAl. DATA FOR HCB CAMP PENDLEToS
M006B1002329
DATA
000000000000000
0015
H006»IOOOBB2
DATA
0109
M00681OOOB79
DATA
0028
H00681000880
DATA
002S
07/21/94
OS/29/92
00166
02.2
OS/H/94
OS/01/92
00166
02.2
OS/18/94
OS/02/92
00166
02.2
05/18/94
06/02/92
00166
02.2
CH2M HILL
MCB CAMP PENDLETOH
WESTON MANAGERS'
IT CORPORATION
WESTON MANAGERS
IT CORPORATION
HESTON MANAGERS
IT CORPORATtON
PARAMETER! VDLATILES
SDQ; 33024
""
SDC» S132S RFH« 9204SS35.9204S646.9204S675
REPORT FOB MCB CAMP
POLYCHLCRINATED BIPHEH^S
SDG» S1284 RFH» 920SS893
~ LABORATORY REPORT FOR MCB CAHP
CC/MS SEHIVOLATILES ANALYSIS
SD00 S1224 RFKB 920SS764.9205S771
ADMIN RECORD ~ioc~
ADMIN RECORD ~pcfl~
ADMIH RECORD SEMIVOLATrLES"
M00681
DATA
000000000000000
0002
PARAMETERS: SEHIVOWTILES
SDC: 33062
SOUTHWEST DIVISION
CH2M HILL
HCB CAMP PENDLETOM
SOUTHWEST DIVISION
-------
DATE - OB/24/9B
UIC NO. DOC.NO. PRC.DATE FROM.... "^.^ PEHDLE™ "HlHISIWItm RECORD FILE INDEX (SORTED BY DOC. DATE)
''''
PAGE • 25
DOCUMENT. TYPE. . .
COWTR/GUID. .NO. .
APPROX.K. OP. PAGES
M006S1
DATA
0006
DATA
0006
000705
DOC. DATE
CTO.NO..
EPA. CAM
05/13/94
06/08/92
,00166
02.2
06/08/92
00166
02.2
FROM. SIGNATURE
TO.....
TO. SIGNATURE
MCB CAMP PENDLTON
MCB CAMP PENDLTON
HESTON MANAGERS
SUBJECT CLASSIFICATION tfcv unonc
W>S1"IJ"10™ KEY HORDS ...Site Location
DATA VALIDATION REPORT FOR MCB CAMP PENDLETOH ADMIN RECORD TOIWMTC
SEMIVOLATILES SDGB S1525 RECORD SOLVENTS
DATA VALIDATION REPORT POR Mrs OHUO DPHni.r*™ 'flPliln HECOBD ^~~
VOLATILES SOG» S1525 XM.UKD vut
LABORATORY REPORT FOR MPB rM4B orHm.r-m,. .-. - __
DATA 06/09/92
00166 IT CORPORATION
0043 02.2
ORGANOCHLORINE PESTICIDES ANALYSIS
SDGB SU46 RFH» 9204S647,9204S661
DATA
0052
DATA
0006
DATA
000000000000000
0005
DATA
000000000000000
0008
06/08/92
00166 IT CORPORATION
02.2
05/31/91
06/08/92
MCB CAMP PENDLETON
02.2
07/20/94 ROY F. HESTON
06/08/92
00000 MCB CAMP PENDLETON
02.2
06/OS/92
00000 MCB CAMP PENDLETON
02.2
LABORATORY REPORT FOR MCB CAMP PENDLETON
ORGAHOCXLORINE PESTICIDES ANALYSIS
SDG» S1124 RFMB 9205S764.9205S171
DATA VALIDATION REPORT MCB CAMP PENDLETON
MATRIX: HATER, SOIL PARAMETERS: SEMIVOLATILES
LAB: ROY F. MESTON SDO* S1S2S
MATRIX: SOIL AND HATER
PARAMETERS: TPH GASOLINE AND TPH DIESEL
SDG: S1S25
PARAMETERS: CLP METALS AND MOLYBDENUM
LABORATORY REPORT FOR MCB CAMP PENDLETON
ADMIN RECORD PESTICIDES'
AOMIN RECORD HATER
SEMIVOLATILES
ADMIN RECORD HATER
FUEL
ADMIH RECORD HATER
METALS
ADMIM Rprnnn unr&fTTBe
SOUTHMEST DIVISION
SOUTHHEST DIVISION
1 • -
DATA 06/0»/92
001S6 IT CORPORATION
0040 02.2
GC/MS VOLATILES ANALYSIS
SDGK S1188 RFW 9204S715,9JOSS721.9S05S754
MOOSai 000088 05/18/94 HESTON MANAGERS
DATA 06/09/92
001S6 IT CORPORATION
0048 02.2
LABORATORY REPORT FOR MCB CAMP PENDLETOH
GC/MS SEMIVOIATILES ANALYSIS
SDGH S1H9 RFH9 9J04S715.9J05S721.S205S7S4
ADMIN RECORD
SEMIVOLATILES
H00681 000889 OS/11/94 HESTON MANAGERS
DATA 06/09/92 :
00166 IT CORPORATION
OOJ2 02.2
LABORATORY REPORT FOR MCB CAMP PENDLETON
GC/MS VOLATILES ANALYSIS
SDGI S1224 RFK« 9205S764.9J05S771
ADMIN RECORD
VOLATILES
-------
PATE - 01/24/98
UtC Ko. DOC.HO.
DOCUMENT.TYPE...
CONTR/CUID. .NO..
PUC.DATE
CLASSIFICATION KEY KORDS
*0«IN RECORD
•SUe Location.......
ADHINISTRATIVE REa)RD
FROH
FROM. SIGNATURE
TO
TO.SICNATURE.'.' \
REPORT FOR «CB
ANALYSIS
RFH» 9204S715.920SS721.9205S754
05/1J/94 CH2M HlEC
06/U/92 PEOOy A. NORTON
001SS IT C08MRATIOH
02.2 CAVE HARK
CH2H HILL
06/H/92 FBooy A.
00166 IT CORPORATION
°2-2 DAVE HARK
05/"/9« CH2H HILL
OS/U/92 PEGOY A. MORTON
001SS ir CORPORATION
02-3 DAVE MARK
RECORD DATA
05/18/94
06/11/9J
OOU6 IT CORPORATIOH
ADMIM RECORD 155
SI«» KIN RFWI) 9204S«J.5JO«676.,204S1I4
05/1J/94 CH2M HILL
06/12/92 PEGGV A. NORTON
OOH6 IT CORPORATION
02.2 DAVHE HARK
05/13/94 CH2Ml»IL
06/12/92 PEGGV A. NORTON
001S6 IT CORPORATION
02.2 DAVE HAHK
ADMIN RECORD HATER
05/13/94 CH2M HILfc
M/12/92 PEOG* A. NORTON
00l«« ,T CORPORATION
02.2 DAVE MARK
OS/13/S4
06/12/92
00166
CHJN HILL
PEGOV A. BOSTON
IT CORPORATION
DAVE HARK
PACE . 2S
-------
DATE - OS/24/98
PRC-DATE FHW
MNlHlSTIWnVH RECORD FRE INDEX (SORTED BY DOC. DATE)
, -
O. . CTO.NO TO
' * •°f-f*°ES EPA- «W TO.'siGKATURE.' .'.'.'
M006J1 000.701 OS/13/94 CH2M HILL
DATA 0«/12/»2 PEGGY A. NORTON
Ol9" Ol»66 IT CORPORATION
"7° "2-2 DAVB MARK
PAGE - 27
SUBJECT
CLASSIFICATION KEY WORDS
•"*«*"•«*»•«•«•»
DATA FOR MCB CAMP
•s*te location
M00681
DATA
32942
0156
OS/13/94 CH2M HILL
06/12/92 PECOY A. NORTON
.001S6 IT CORPORATION
.02.2 DAVE MARK
ADMIN RECORD PESTICIDES
PCB
TFH
HERBICIDE
ADMIN RECORD PESTICIDES"
PCB
TFH
05/13/94 WESTIOM MRNAOERS
OS/1S/»Z
'0016S IT CORPORATION
02.2
HERBICIDE
RECORD" PESTICIDES
LABORATORY REPORT FOR
05/13/94 HZSTIOB HMIAGERS
IT CORPORATION
ftFW 9205S764.9205S771
MATRIX: SOIL
MOOC61
DATA
000000000000000
0050
""«" -
HC8CAHPPENDLETON
ADMIN RECORD SEMIVOLATILEi
SOUTHHEST DIVISION
05/12/94 NBSTON HANAGERS
OS/18/92
001SS MCB CAMP PEHDLETOM
ADMIN RECORD PESTICIDES
OS/12/94 WESTON HAHAQEIls
06/19/93
0016S MCB CAMP PENDLETON
02.2
CMf ""M-mSir-SK: A^MIN RECORD foe
SDC» S12«4 RFHI 920SS86i
05/13/94 HOV f. HESTION
06/2S/92
"0166 IT CORPOfiATION
02-S DAVE MARK
ADMIN RECORD IOC
05/13/94 CH2MHILL
06/J5/92 PEOOY A. NORTON
00166 IT CORPORATION
02.2 DAVE MARK
mm "* HCB
ORGANICS, PESTICIDES, PCB, TFH
OS/13/94 CH2M HILL
06/26/92 PEGGY A.: NORTON
00166 IT CORPORATION
°2.2 DAVE MARK
-------
DATE - Q«/24/JI
UIC Ho. DOC.TO. PRC.DATB FXOH *** CW? PEHDtET011 ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD FILE INDEX
DOCUHENTTYPe... DOC.DATE FROfrsiGHATOHE:'.'.'.'.'.
COWTH/GU1D..NO.. CTO.NO.. TO
APPROX.K.OF.PAGES EPA.CAT* ToisicNATURE SUBJECT
'.'.I'.''.'.'.
(SORTED BY DOC. DATE)
CLASSIFICATION KEYWORDS
PAGE
• Site Location
HOOCH
DATA
00120J 05/27/94 HESTOM HANAGERS
06/29/92
.,„ °°IS6 IT CORPORATIOH
0233 02-2
LABORATORY REPORT FOR HCB CAMP PEHDIETOH
S1S77
MO 0681
DATA
32991
0219
K006M'
DATA
33007
0476
00070)
OS/13/94
07/06/92
00166
02.2
05/13/94
07/08/92
00166
02.2
CH2M HILL
PEGGY A. NORTOH
IT CORPORATIOH
DAVE HARK
CH2K HILL
PEGGY A. NORTON
IT CORPORATIOH
DAVE MARX
ANALYTICAL DATA FOR HCB CAHP PENDLEToif
ORGAHICS SDG. S1548 RFH» 9206SOS2,9206SOB7
OC\HS VOLATILES ANALYSIS
noosei
DATA
0134
0008S3
05/M/94 WESTON MANAGERS'
07/01/92 :
00166 IT CORPORATION
02.2
LABOKATURY REPORT FOR HCB CAMP PENDLETON~
CLP/OCHS/SEHIVOLATILES ANALYSIS
SDG» S1577 RFKB 9206S093
ADMIN RECORD PESTICIDES
ADMIN RECORD VOC~
PESTICIDES
PCB
TFH
HERBICIDE
"SEHIVOLATILES
H00601
DATA
330(2
0168
M006B1
DATA
33042
0073
H00691
DATA
33062
0112
M00681
DATA
33024
0353
000711
05/18/94 HESION MANAGERS
07/08/92
00166 IT CORPORATION
,02.2
;05/13/94 CH2M HILL
07/10/92 PEGGY A. NORTOH
00166 IT CORPORATION
02.2 DAVE MARK
CAMP PEMDLETO«
ADMIN RECORDSOLVENTS
OS/13/9* CH2H HILL
07/10/92 PEGGY A. NORTON
001S6 IT CORPORATION
02.2 DAVE HARK
DATA KOR HOT CAW FENDI-ETON
ADMIN RECORD TFH
OS/13/94 CH2M HILL
07/10/92 PEGGY A. NORTON
001SS IT CORPORATIOH
02.2 DAVE MARK
00071SOS/1J/94 CH2M
07/10/92 PEGGY A. NORTON
00166 IT CORPORATION
02.2 DAVE NARK
05/13/94 CH2M HILL"
07/13/92 PEGGY A. NORTON
00166 IT CORPORATION
02.2 DAVE HARK
INORGANICS
UA1A tm **CMf
ABHIN RECORD IOG~
PESTICIDES
PCS
HERBICIDES
TFH
-------
DATE • 08/24/91
OIC HO. DOC.NO. PRC.DATE FROH "^ """ PEHDLEI°H *°«""STKATIVE RECORD FILE tHDEX (SORTED BY DOC. DATE)
DOCUMENT. TYPE. .
CONTR/GUID. .NO.
APPROX.K.OF.PAG
H00681 000703
33063
0183
MOOG81 00071S
33063
0084
H00661 000717
DATA
33019
019<
H00681 000718"
DATA
33019
0104
M00681 000698
DATA
33043
0242
H00681 0006B9 ~
DATA
33053
0763
MQ0681 000692
DATA
33S34
MOOC81 002480
DATA
000000000000000
0136
DATA
33064
0552
M00681 000690
DATA
33141
034S
. DOC. DATE FROM. SIGNATURE. .
. CTO.NO.. TO
!o5/13/9« CH2M HILL
07/13/92 PEGGY A. NORTON
.00166 IT CORPORATION
02.2 DAVE MARX
05/13/94 CH2H HILL
07/13/92 PEGGY A. NORTON
00166 IT CORPORATION
02.2 DAVE MARK
OS/13/»4 CH2M HILL
07/13/92 PEGGY A. NORTON
00166 IT CORPORATION
02.2 DAVE HARK
05/13/94 CH2M HILL
07/13/92 PEGGY A. NORTON
0016B IT CORPORATION
02.2 DAVE MARK
OS/13/94 CN2N HILL ~~
07/16/92 PEGGY A. NORTON
00166 IT CORPORATION
02.2 CAVE HARK
05/13/94 CH2M HILL
07/17/92 PEGGY A. NORTON
00166 IT COBPORATION
02.2 DAVE HARK
'05/13/94 CK2M HILL ' "
07/17/92 PEGGY A. NORTON
00166 IT CORPORATION
02.2 DAVE MARK
07/22/94 ' :
07/17/92
00000 MCB CAMP PENDLETON
02.2
05/13/94 CH2N HILL
07/18/92 PEGGY A. NORTON
00166 IT CORPORATION
02.2 DAVE HARK
05/13/94 CH2M Hilt
07/20/92 PEGGY A. NORTON
00166 IT CORPORATION
02.2 DAVE MARK
SUBJECT
>•«•-»... .•••*•,...,. .... ..,»„„.,.. .............
ANALYTICAL DATA FOR MCB CAMP PENDLETON
ORGANICS
ANALYTICAL DATA FOR MCB CAMP PENDLETON
INORGANICS
ANALYTICAL DATA FOR MCB CAMP
ORGANICS
ANALYTICAL DATA FOR MCB CAMP
INORGANICS
ANALYTICAL DATA FOR MCB CAMP
ORCANICS
ANALYTICAL DATA FOR MCB CAMP
INORGANICS
ANALYTICAL DATA FOR MCB CAMP
INORGANIC ANALYSIS DATA REPOR1
SDG 29147
PENDLETON
PENDLETON
PENDLBTON
PENDLETON
W1ALTTICAL DATA FOR MCB CAMP PENDLETON
ORGANICS
^.^ DATA FOR MCB CAMP PENDLirON
ADMIN RECORD
ADMIN RECORD
ADMIN RECORD
ADMIN RECORD
ADMIN RECORD
PENDLETON ADMIN RECORD
ADMIN RECORD
ADMIN RECORD
ADMIN RECORD
ADMIN RECORD
KEYWORDS ...SIt, Location
PESTICIDES
PCB
TFH
HERBICIDE
PCB
TFH
PESTICIDES "
PCB
TFH
HERBICIDES
DATA .
J*T* SOUTHWEST DIVISION
HH
DISPOSAL
IOG —
PAGE - 29
-------
DATE - 01/24/91
UIC Ho. DOC.NO.
PRC.DATE
55-55"
FROM.
**"* PEHOLETO" ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD FILE IHDEX (SORTED » DOC DATE]
"::
:".' .................... SUBJECT ........................... CLASSIFICATION
PACE - 30
MOOCH
DATA
33143
007S
000693
05/13/54
07/23/92
00166,
02.2
CH2H HILL
PEGGY A. NORTON
IT CORPORATION
DAVE KARK
PENDLETON
ADHIN RECORD
KEY WORDS
JOG
•Site Location.
u*-.. •
: HATER PARAMETER: VOLATILES LAB: ESE
M00681
DATA
33143
0262
00)155
OS/JS/94
07/23/M
00166
02.3
CH2H HILL
PEOOY A. HOtTON
IT. CORPORATION
DAVE HARK
, SEMIVOLATIUS. TFH. PESTICIDES, PCBs
VOALTILES
SEHIVOLATILES
TFH
AHALKTICAL DATA FOR HCB CAMP PENDLBTON
SBHVOLATILES. TFH. PESTICIDES. PCB.
HOOS81
DATA
33142
0264
05/25/94
07/23/92
00166
02.2
CH2M HILL
PEGGY A. NORTON
IT CORPORATION
DAVE HARK
VOALTILES
SEHIVOLATILES
TFH
H006«l 002274
DATA
000000000000000
0060
003349
DATA
000000000000000
001S
07/20/94
07/23/92
001«6
02.2
07/21/94
PV29/92
00166
02.2
CH2H HILL
PEOOT A. NORTON
IT CORPORATION
DAVE KARK
ESE
HCB CAHP PENDLETOH
M00681 "002354
DATA
000000000000000
0030
07/21/94
07/29/92
001S«
02.2
ESE
MCB CAMP PENDLETON
MATRIX: WATER
PARAMETERS! CHLORINATED HERBICIDES
SOG: 030443. CJ1088
CASE: NACPHJD
ADHIN RECORD
MATRIX: HATER
PARAMETERS: SEM1VOLATILES
SOG: 030484 AND C30704
ADMIN RECORD
MOOSI1 002J55
DATA
000000000000000
0017
07/21/94
07/29/92
00166
02.2
ESE -
MCB CAMP PENDLETON
MATRIX: HATER
PESTICIDES
PCB
HERBICIDE
DATA
HATER
HERBICIDE
HATER
SEMIVOLATILES
PARAMETERS: PESTICIDES/PCB*
SDG: G304B2
Divisioii
SOUTHWEST DIVISION
ADMIN RECORD
0023S7
DATA
000000000000000
0015
-------
DATE - 08/2.1/98 .
UIC No. DOC.NO. ipRC.DATE
DOCIMENT.-WPE... DOC.DATE
CONTS/GUID..NO.. CTO.NO..
APPROX. 0. OP. PAGES EPA. CAM
FROM ........ . . ..
FROM. SIGNATURE. . .
TO
••••
TO. SIGNATURE
PENDLETON ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD FILE !NDEX (SORTED BY DOC. DATE)
CLASSIFICATION KEY WRDS
PAGE - 31
H00681 002347
DATA
ooooooooooooooo
0010
VOC
GC/MS
SEMIVOLAT1LES
VOLATILES
Silt Location
SOOTHHEST DIVISION
07/21/94
07/31/92
00166
02.2
MATRIX: HATER
""-«*»"« «« ™-«««. CASE: ««««
*CB CAMP PENDLETCN
M00681 002350
ESE
MCB CAMP PENDLETON
OOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
ESE
MCB CAMP PBNDLETON
RECORD HATER
OOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
M006S1
DATA
000000000000000
0010
ESE
«CB CAMP PENDLETON
DATA VALIDATION REPORT MCB CAMP PENDLBTON
MATRIX: HATER PARAMETERS: BORON
HCH ,CAMP fBmiBttM
HESTON HAJJACERS
LABORATORY REPORT FOR MCB CAMP PENDLETON
9207S4H CL" *NW'YSIS SD°* "*"* *"» »M«J<"
HESTOH MANAGERS
LABORATORY REPORT FOR HCB CAMP PENDLETON
INOROAHICS NON CLP ANALYSIS SDCK WJU6
RFWI 9S07S377,9207S««
07/22/91
08/28/92
ENVIRON 4 SCI ENS.
CASE: NACPS2D.22.21
WCB CAMP PENDLETON
M00681 002477 bT/22/9« ENVIRON S SCI ENG
ESE FIELD GROUP SAMPLES. CASE, NACPS2D-20 21
MCB CAMP PBHDLETOH
-------
DATE . 0*/24/5»
"1C Bo. DOC.NO.
OOCUMENT.TYPB...
CONIR/CUID..NO..
PRC.DATE
DOC.DATE
CTO.NO
.... .
APPHOX.I.OF.PftCES EPA.CATI
FKOH ......... .
FROM.SICHATUHB ......
M00681
DATA
33536
0190
H00681
DATA
0027
H006ir
DATA
33S77
0180
H00681
DATA
31598
0110
H00681
DATA
33599
0303
M00681
DATA
33560
0249
001163
001336
05/25/94
09/02/92
OOUf
03.2
CH2H HILL
PEGGlf A. NORTON
IT CORPORATION!
DAVE HARK
"«"«STRATIVB RECORD FILK IHDEX (SORTEO „ ^
'
SUWECT ...........................
AHALVTICAL DATA FOR HCB CAMP PEHDLFrnu
VOLATILES. SMIVOLATILES TFH
METALS
PAGE
••-•••«•••«••••»..«..„.
ADHIN RECORD
09/02/93
HCB CAHP PEHDMTON
DATA VALIDATION REPORT HCB CAHP PENDLETOH
MATRIX: HATER PARAMETERS: BORON PENOLETOH
"fl: ROY F. RESTOH SDGI H2372
KEY KOROS
VOALTILES
SEHIVOLATILES
TFH
METALS
•slte ....... Location ......
ADKIN RECORD
001IG1
001162
001165
09/03/92
00166
,02.2
05/25/94
09/03/92
00166
02-.2
CH2M HILL
PEGGY A. NORTON
IT CORPORATION
DAVE MARK
CH2M HIU,
PEGCT A. NOilTOIJ
IT CORPORATION
DAVE HARK
METALS
SEHIVOLATIIES, TFH
AHALmCAt. DATA FOB HCB CAHP
VOUTILES. SEMIVOLATrLES. TFH
METALS '
ADHIH RECOfiD
A0HIH RECORD
VOALTILES
SEMI VOALTILES
TFH
METALS
ANALYTICAL DATA FOR
TFH. VOLATILES.
DATA
33S99
0239
Hoocai
DATA
33514
0183
M00681
DATA
33559
0197
05/25/94 CH2H HIU,
05/03/92 PEGGY A. NORTON
00166 IT CORPORATION
02.2 DAVE MARK
Ob/2S/94 CH2M HILL"
09/03/92 PEGGY A. NORTON
00166 IT CORPORATIOH
02.2 OAVE MARK
°011" «!./25/9« CH2M HILL
09/03/92 PEGGY A. NORTON
00166 IT CORPORATION
02.2 DAVE HARK
001 "1 04/25/94 CH2H HILL
09/03/92 PEGGY A. NORTON
0016* IT CORPORATION
01.1 DAVE HARK
UAiA MW HCB CAMP PENDLETON
AOMIN RECORD
SEHIVOLATILES
TFH
METALS
METALS"
FOR
AHALYTICAL DATA FOR HCB CAMP
VOLATILES.
001174
05/2S/94
09/03/92
0016S
02.2
CH2M HILL
PEGGY A. NORTON
IT CORPORATION
DAVE HARK
SEHIVOLATILES. TFH. KCTAU!
ADMIN RECORD
ADMIN RECORD
ADMIN RECORD
TFH
VOLATILES
SEHIVOALTILES
TFH
VOLATILES
VOLATILES
SEM1VOLATILES
TFH
HETALS
VOALTILES
SEMIVOLATILES
TFH
METALS
-------
DATE - 08/24/98
"""
UIC NO. DOC.NO. PRC.DATE FROM....
DOCUMENT.TYPE. . . DOC.DATE FROM.SIGNATURE] . !
CONtB/GUID..NO. . CTO.NO.. TO... ...........
APPROX.d.OF.PAGES EPA.CATK TO. SIGNATURE
ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD FILE INDEX (SORTED BY DOC. DATE)
SUBJECT CLASSIFICATION KEY HORDS
PACE - J3
• Site Location.
MOOS81 00117S OS/25/94 CH2M HILL
DW* 09/03/92 PEGGir A. NORTON-
33560 00166 IT CORPORATION
»s" .02.2 DAVE MARK
H00681
DATA
0011
001J3S 05/11/94
09/09/92
02.2
MCB CAMP PENDLETON
ANALYTICAL CATA FOR HCB CAMP PENDLETON
METALS
DATA VALIDATION REPORT HCB CAMP PENDLETOM
MATRIX: WATER PARAMETERS: CHLORINATED HERBICIDES
LAB: ROY F. HESTON SDC« H2282
H00«81001337OS/31/94
DATA OS/09/J2
0007
0007
0013
02.J
MCB CAMP PENDLETOH
DATA VALIDATION REPORT MCB CAMP PEHDLETON"
MATRIX. MATER PARAMETERS: ALKALINITY
LAB: ROY F. HESTON SDG» H2282
M00681 001339 OS/31/94
DATA 09/09/92
02.2
MCB CAMP FENDLETON
DATA VALIDATION REPORT HCB CAMP PENDLETON
MATRIX: HATER PARAMETERS: TOTAL DISSOLVED SOLIDS
LAB: ROY f. HESTON SDG» H2242
M00681 001339 OS/31/94
DATA 09/09/92
02.2
MCB CAMP PENDLETOM
DATA VALIDATION REPORT MCB CAMP PENDLETOM'
MATRIX: WATER PARAMETERS: ANIONS
LAB: ROY F. HESTON SDGU H2282
ADMIN RECORD METALS
ADMIN RECORD HATER
HERBICIDE
ADMIN RECORD WATER
ADHIN RECORD HATER
ADMIN RECORD HATER
H00691
DATA
0007
DATA
0031
DATA
0028
DATA
0044
H00681
DATA
001J40 05/31/94
09/09/92
MCB CAMP PENDLETON
02.2
0»/0»/92
MCB CAMP PENDLETON
02.2
09/09/92
MCB CAMP PENDLETON
02.2
09/09/92
MCB CAMP PENDLETON
02.2
001344 05/31/94 ~~" "~" ' "
09/09/43
DATA VALIDATION REPORT MCB CAMP PENDLETOW ~ ADMIN RECORD
MATRIX: HATER PARAMETERS: TPH CASOLINE & DIESEL
LAB: ROY F. KESTOH SDGD H22B2
DATA VALIDATIOM REPORT MCB CAMP PENDLETON AMnrx arm™ " "
MATRIX: HATER PARAMETERS, ORGANOCHLORIOE PESTICIDES
PC88 LAB: ROY F. WESTON SDS« H2282
DATA VALIDATION REPORT MCB CAMP PENDLETON : AOMIN RECOBD
MATRIX: HATER PARAMETERS: TAL METALS t MOLYBDENUM
LAB: ROY F. MESTON SDG» H2282
DATA VALIDATION REPORT MCB CAMP PEKDLETON AnMIH ntrnnr,
MATRIX: HATER PARAMETERS: VOLATILES HECOHD
LAB: ROY F. WESTON SDG» H2282
^™.!ALi?"'0"REPORT «• ^P "ENDLETO, ADMIN RECOBD
HATER ~
HATER " —
PESTICIDES
PCB
METALS
HATER ~ •
VOLATILES
WJkTPR — •
0043
02.2
MCB CAMP PENDLETON
MATRIX: HATER PARAMETERS: SEMIVOLATILES
LAB: ROY F. HESTON SDGd H2282
SEMI VOLATILES
-------
DATE - Ot/24/9*
UIC Mo. DOC.NO. PRC.DATE FROM "" *"* PENDLETOH ADHIHISTRATIVE RECORD FILE INDEX (SORTED BY
OOCWEHT.TYPE... DOC.DATE FROM. SIGNATURE.'.'.''.'.'.
COHTR/CU1D..NO.. CTO.KO.. TO.
APFROX.'l.OF.PACBS EPA.CATI TO.SIGHATORE.'.'.'.'.'.'.'." SUBJECT
DOC. DATE)
PAGE - 34
M006I1
DATA
33(24
0219
001144
05/25/94
09/11/92
00166
02.2
CH2H HILL
PEGGY A. NORTON
IT CORPORATION
CAVE HARK
"«•""»•••••......„.„....„.„..
ANALYTICAL DATA FOR MCB CAHP
••••«•«•«•••••
.~.
*— »»
K£Y«0,U,S
VOALTILES
SEMFVOALTILES
TFH
PESTICIDES
PCB
METALS
HERBICIDE
VOLATILES
SEHIVOALTILBS
PESTICIDES
PCB
TFH"
METALS
M00681
DATA
33690
0028
001170 05/25/94
09/11/9J
00166
02.2
CH2M HIU.
PECOY A. NORTON
IT CORPORATION
DAVE HARK
M00681
DATA
ooooooooooooooo
0007
07/19/94
09/14/9J
DOOOO
02.2
MCB CAMP PENDLETON
TOTAL DISSOLVED SOU DS SDO: H2294
DATA 09/14/92
ooooooooooooooo ooooo HCB CAHP PEMDLETON
0007 02.2
MUTER ' —
PARAMETERS: ANIONS SDC „„,.
ICHLORIDE.HITRATE-N.NITRATE-N AND SULFATE) '
ADMIN RECORD HATER
SfOlTTHWEST DIVISION
SOUTHWEST DIVISION
-------
DATE - OS/24/98
OIC Ho. DOC.NO. PRC.DATE FROM. .......
DOCUMENT. TYPE... DOC.DATE FROH.SIGNATURE .
COHTR/GUID. .NO.. CTO.HO.. TO...
.«"...»......«•«.,.......„.. .................
M00681 002240 07/20/94 ROY P. HESTOM
DATA 09/14/92
000000000000000 00000 . MCB CAMP PENDLETON
0009 02.2
M00681 OD22S7 07/20/94 ROY F. HESTON '
DATA 09/14/92
OOOOOOOOOOOOOOO OOOOO MCB CAMP PENDLETON
0004 02.2
M006Q1 00225B 07/20/94 HOY F UESTOM ~
DATA 09/14/92
OOOOOOOOOOOOOOO OOOOO MCB CAMP PENDLBTON
0025 02.2 :
miui.ni 002259 07/20/94 ROY F. HESTON
DATA 09/14/92
000000000000000 OOOOO MCB ! CAMP PENDLBTON
0009 02.2
CATA 09/16/92
33M3 00164 IT CORPORATION
0927 02.2
**** 09/16/92 PEGGY A. NORTON
33S«3 00166 IT CORPORATION
°0« 02.2 DAVE MARK
DAT* 09/16/92 PEGGY A. NORTON
««6 00166 IT CORPORATION
0252 02.2 DAVE MARK
"ATA 09/16/92 PEGGY A. NORTON
13673 00166 IT CORPORATION
°'Z6 02.2 DAVE MARK
WP PENDLETOH ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD FILE INDEX (SORTED BY
' SUBJECT
MATRIX: HATER
PARAMETERS: SEMIVOLATILES SDG: H2J94
PARAMETERS: TPH GASOLINE AND TPH DIESEL SDG: H2590
MATRIX: WATER • — —
PARAMETERS: BORON
SDG: H2292 AND H2294
MATRIX: HATER •
PARAMETERS: TAL METALS AND MOLYBDENUM
SOG: W2294
ANALYTICAL DATA FOR MCB CAMP PENDLETON !
VOLATILES. SEHIVOLATILEB, TFH, METALS. PESTICIDES, PCB
HERBICIDES
ANALYTICAL DATA FOR MCB CAMP PENDLETOH
CYANIDE, SDGK H2231 RFW) 92085633
ANALYTICAL DATA FOR MCB CAMP PENDLBTON
VOLATILES, SEMIVOLATILES. PESTICIDES PCBa
TFH. METALS, HERBICIDES
ANALYTICAL DATA FOR MCB CAMP PENDLETON ~
VOLATILES, SEMIVOLATILES. PESTICIDES. PCBs
TFH, METALS, HERBICIDES
DOC. DATE)
CLASSIFICATION KEYWORDS ...Site.,
•""•"--"'••mmmm*,mm*mmmm*»mmm,,,,m,,n,m.,fmM
ADMIN RECORD HATER
SEMIVOLATILES
ADMIN RECORD WATER ' " '
FUEL
ADMIN RECORD HATER ~~
METALS
ADHIN RECORD VOLATILES "~'~
SEHIVOLATILES
TFH
METALS
PESTICIDES
PCB
HERBICIDE
ADMIN RECORD CYANIDE ~~
ADMIN RECORD VOLATILES "" ~
SEMIVOLATILES
PESTICIDES
PCB
TFH
METALS
HERBICIDE
ADMIN RECORD VOLATILES
SEMIVOLATILES
PESTICIDES
PCB
TFH
METALS
HERBICIDE
PAGE
Location
SOUTHWEST DIVISION
SOUTHWEST DIVISION
SOimWEST DIVISION
SOUTHWEST DIVISION
— — ~— — ~— —~ _^_
-------
DATE - 09/24/91
HCB
UIC Ho. DOC.NO. PRC.DATE FROM
DOCUHEHT.TYPB..
COSTR/CUID..HO.
APPROX.K.OF.PAG
K00681 001210
DATA
0061
M00681 001211
DATA
0109
H006B1 001213
DATA
0070
DATA
003S
H006B1 001217
DATA
0041
DATA
000000000000000
0028
DATA
000000000000000
oooa
DATA
33612
0212
DATA
33683
0795
. DOC. DATE FROM. SIGNATURE...
. CTO.BO., TO
05/27/94 HESTON MANAGERS
09/17/92 •
OOU6 IT CORPORATION
02.2
09/17/92
00166 IT CORPORATION
02.2
09/17/92
00166 IT CORPORATION
02.2
: 05/27/91 HESTON MANAGERS
: 09/11/92
j 00166 IT CORPORATION
02.2
09/17/92
00166 IT CORPORATION
02.2
09/21/92 :
00000 MCB CAMP PENDLETON
02.2
09/21/92
00000 MCB CAMP PENDLETON
02.2
09/22/92 I
00166 IT CORPORATION
02.2
i. .
i. . • • .
05/18/94 HESTON MANAGERS
09/22/92
00166 IT CORPORATION
02.2 DAVE MARK
CAMP PENDLETOH ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD FILE IKOEX (SORTED BY DOC DATEI
SUBJECT CLASSTFlriTTftu
"" ""— ••---.»•••-....•.........
LABORATORY REPORT FOR HCB CAMP PENDLETON ,„,,„ RFm,n
WI^VOLATIIES WUU.YSJS SDG, H2U6 „„, ,50,53,, WWIN RECO*°
LABORATORY REPORT FOR HCB CAMP PENDLETON AtXIH DPr-nnX
S^S"™*"1"8 M)AtYSIS SDC* """ RF>" 92D7S3"
tABOHATaHY REPORT FOR MCB CAMP PENDLETON ADMIH RECORD
TOTAL EXTRACTABLE PETROLEW1 HYDROCARBONS ANALYSIS
SDGd H211S RFNK 9207S377.9207S434
LABORATORY REPORT FOR HCB CAMP"PEN5EI?ON ADMIN RECOUP '"
METALS SDGI H2116 RFH1 9207S377.9207S434
LABORATORY REPORT FOR MCB CAMP PBNDLETON ADMIN RECORD
TOTAL PURGEA8LE PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS ANALYSIS
SDGH W2U« RFH» 9207S377.9207S434
MATRIX: WATER ~ .-...„ -;;
PARAMETERS: TAt HETALS AHD MOLYBDENUM SDG: H2506
MATRIX: HATER '"
PARAMETERS: TAL HETALS AND MOLYBDENUM RECORD
SDC: H2S06
ANALYTICAL DATA FOR MCB CAMP PENDLETON ADMIN RECORD
HETALS. VOLATILES.SEMIVOLATILES. PESTICIDES PCB
TFH. HERBICIDES '
ANALYTICAL DATA FOR MCB CAMP PENDLETON ADMIN RECOUP ~
HETALS. VOLATILES. SEHIVOLATILES, PESTICIDES PCB
TFH. HERBICIDES
PACE
KEYHORDS ...site Location
VOLATILES
SEMIVOLATILES ~ •
TEH
METALS ~" ~~ :
TPH
US??. SOUTHWEST DIVISION
METALS
JJ*^^ SOUTHHEST DIVISION
VOLATILES
SEMIVQLATILES
PESTICIDES
PCB
TFH
HERBICIDE
VOLATILES '
SEHIVOLATILES
PESTICIDES
—
-------
DATE - 08/24/98
VIC (to. DOC.NO. ; PRC.DATE FROM "
DOCWffiNT.TYPE. . - DOC.DATE FROM SIGNATURE
CONTR/GUID. .NO. . CTO.NO TOL"-S>IGHA™BE
APPROX.».OF.PAGES EPA.CAM TO.'siGNATURE.'.'."."
••«» •
PENDLETON ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD PILE INDEX (SORTED BY DOC. DATE)
SUBJECT
CLASSIFICATION KEYHORDS
PAGE - J7
•Site Location
M00691
DATA
33696
0059
HOOC81 .
DATA
33719
1003
001184 05/25/94 CH2M HILL
i 09/22/92 PEGGY A. NORTON
00166 IT CORPORATION
02.2 DAVE MARK
OS/18/94 HESTON MANAGERS
09/24/92
0016« IT CORPORATION
02.2 DAVE HARK
001019 OS/18/94 HESTON MANAGERS"
09/25/92
00166 IT CORPORATION
;02.2 DAVE MARK
C*MP
ADMIN RECORD CYANIDE
"AHALVTICAL DATA FOR MCB CAMP
VOLATILES, SEMIVOLATILES
ANALYTICAL DATA FOR MCB CAMP PENDLETON
PESTICIDES-PCB-
ADMIN RECORD
ADMIN RECORD
002260
DATA
000000000000000
D015
HOOtlT 00226T
DATA
000000000000000
oooe
M00««l 002262"
DATA
ooooooaooooaooo
000$
HD06S1
DATA
000000000000000
0010
MOOS81
DATA
OOOOOOOOOOOODOO
0006
H00661
DATA
000000000000000
0035
07/20/94
09/25/92
00000
02.2
09/25/92
00000
02.2
09/25/92
00000
02.2
ROY F. HESTON
MCB CAMP PENDLETON
ROY F. HESTON
HCB CAMP PENDLBTON
ROY F. HESTON
MCB CAMP PENDLBTON
ROY F. HESTON
MCB CAMP PENDLETON
VOLATILES
SEMIVOLATILES
VOLATILES
SEMIVOLATILES
PESTICIDES
PCB
TFH
HERBICIDE
METALS
HATRIX: HATER
PARAMETERS: TOTAL DISSOLVED SOLIDS
SDG: H2336
HATRIX: HATER
tPH GASOLINE TPH
MATRIX: WATER"
PARAMETERS: VOLATILES
SDG: H2336
MATRIX: HATER'
PARAMETERS: CHLORINATED HERBICIDES
SDG: H33J6
MATRIX: HATER
PARA«ETERS: TAL METALS AND MOLYBDENUM
SDG: H2336
ADMIN RECORD WATER
ADMIN RECORD HATER
FUEL
ADMIN RECORD WATER
VOLATI1ES
HATER
HERBICIDE
HATER
METALS
ADMIN RECORD
ADMIN RECORD
SOUTHWEST DIVISION
SOlrrHWEST DIVISION
SOOTHHEST DIVISION
SOUTHWEST DIVISION
SOUTHWEST DIVISION
SOOTHHEST DIVISION
-------
DATE • 01/24/91
U1CHO. DOC.HO. PRC.DATE
DOCUHENT.TYPE... DOC.DATE
CONTfl/GUID. .NO.. CTO.NO
APPROX.H.OF.PAGES EPA.CAT*
HCB CAHP PEHDLETOH ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD FILE INDEX (SORTED
HOOCSl 002266
DATA
000000000000000
0009
07/20/94
09/25/92
00000
FROH.SICNATURE!..
TO
TO.SIGHATURE-.'.'.'.'.'.'. SUBJECT
ROY F. HESTON MATRIX: HATER
WfflMPKNOUn* STS& SWIV°UTILES
DOC. DATE!
. CLASSIFICATION KEY HORDS
PACE . ],
AWIN RECORD HATER
SEHtVOLATltES
HOOSB1 001010
DATA
33733
0301
DATA
0230
HOOS81
DATA
3J740
0218
05/18/94
09/26/92
00166
02.2
IT CORPORATION
DAVE HARK
001011 05/18/94 MESTON HAKACERS
09/26/92
g0166 „ CORPORATION
02.2 DAVE MARK
ADMIN RECORD
METALS
VOLATILES
SEHIVOIATILES
PESTICIDES
PCS
TFH
HERBICIDE
METALS"
VOLATILES
SEMIV01ATILES
001020
MOOS81 0008S6
DATA
0109
0012
05/H/J4 MESTOH MANAGERS
-------
DATE - 08/24/98 '
OICNo. WC.NO.i PRC.DATE FROM
CAMP PENDLETON
: RECORD FILE INDEX (SORTED BY I
APPROX.».OF.PAGES EFA.'cATt TO.'siGNATURE SUBJECT
• • ««:::; _.
PAGE - JJ
NOOm
DATA
0079
000868
05/18/94
09/30/92
00166
OZ. 2
HESTON MANAGERS
: IT CORPORATION
LABORATORY RETORT FOR HCB CAMP PENDLBTnu
CLASSIFICATION Kw TORDS
'""""—"—"•»
ADMIN RECORD TPH
•••Site Location
HESTOH MANAGERS
IT CORPORATION
- .
ORGAHOCHLORIHE PESTICIDES ANALYSIS
~ ""«•'»».*
RFWK S209S765.9209S780.9209S791.9J09S80H
05/18/S4
10/02/92
00166
02.2
0100
OS/H/94
10/02/92
ooiss
02.2
WESTON MANAGERS
IT CORPORATION
HESTOH MANAGERS
IT CORPORATION!
W206 Rn,» 92085595.92083674.92093697.920957,9
SD08 H2J06 RFH» »aO«SS»S.920«S«74.»20»S«7.«0»S71»
05/U/94
10/02/92
OOIS6
02,2
BESTOH MANAGERS
DATA ro« HCB CAHP
SEMIVOLATILES
VOLAT1LES
PCS
IT CORPORATION
DAVE HARK
OQ1015 B5/H/M HESTOH RANAOERS
10/02/92
"B06 00166 IT CORPORATION
0224 "2.2 DAVE KARK
«IALYTICAL DATA FOR HCB CAMP
VOLATILES
SEMIVOLATILES
TFH
MOOtil00110105/31/94
DATA 10/02/92
HCH CAMP PEHDLETOM
M0068100130305/31/S4
DATA 10/02/92
ADMIN RECORD HATER
MCB CAMP PENDLETON
-------
DATE - 01/24/91
OICKo. DOC.NO. PRC.DATE ,nun
SSSr"*"- MC-Dm FKOM.SIGHATURE....
CONTR/GUID. .HO.. CTO.NO.. TO
APPROX.».OF.PAGES EPA.CAM
FILE |HDBC
SUBJECT ..... .
MOOS81
DATA
0001
001301
OS/31/94
10/02/92
02.2
MCB CAMP PENDLETON
REPOBT "
X! HATER PARAMETERS: ALKALINITY
WE, ROY F. HESTON SDG» H237S
BY BOC. DATE)
... CLASSIFICATION KEYWORDS
...... •»«•••••«•.»,„„«,,„„,, >>-m
ADMIN RECORD HATER
PACE . 40
•Slte Location
0036
02.2
MCB CAHP PEHDLBTOH
™™r*«
MATRIX: HATER PARAMETERS: VOLATILES
LAB: ROK F. KESTOH SDG» W237S
01SO
05/18/94
10/05/92
00166
02.2
HESTON MANAGERS
IT CORPORATION
HERBICIDES ANALYSIS
SDG» W2272 RFW» 9209S765.9209S780.9209S791.9209S804
ADMIN RECORD HERBICIDE
MESTON MANAGERS
LABORATORY REPORT FOR MCB CAMP PENDLETON
CAMP
: TAL
F. HESTON SDO» H2383
KCB CAMP PEHDLETON
05/31/94
10/05/92
S™.?".'.!£"'* i*"1"" «»•«*» PENDLETON
MATRIX: HATER PARAMETERS: AHIONS
MCB CAMP PEHOLBTON
LAB: ROY F. HESTOB SDGI H2383
05/31/94
10/05/92
MCB CAMP PENDLETOM
PEKDLETON
I DIESEL
0001
02.2
MCB CAMP PENDLETON
L MCB
RS: '
f. HESTON SDOK H2383
02.2
MCB CAMP PENDLETON
LAB: ROY F. HESTON SDoi.^^ D1SS°LVBD S°UDS
-------
DATE - 08/24/91 }
UIC No. DOC.NO. PRC.DATE
DOCUMENT. TYPE... DOC.DATE
CONTR/CUID. .NO.. CTO MO
APPROX.H.OF.PAGES EPA.CAT»
FROM.
FROM. SIGNATURE
TO
TO. SIGNATURE.''.'.
NOOCB1
DATA
0029
00132]
ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD FILE INDEX (SORTED BY
SUBJECT :.....•
•
»»*..«.***m******mmmm*mmmmmmm
DOC. DATE)
CLASSIFICATION KEYWORDS
PAGE -
•Sice Locaticn
•"****»»3*»»»*»--Mwm-M
PESTldDES ADMI'1 REC°RD "«"
PESTICIDES
PCB
05/31/94
10/05/92
05/31/94
JO/OS/J2
AOMIN RECORD mtSR
PARAMETERS: ALKALINITY
LAB: ROY r. NESTON SDOK W2383
MCB CAMP PENDLETON
MCB CAMP PENDLETON
ROY F. MESTOH SDOK «383
OS/3i/94
10/OS/92
: HATER PARAKETERS: VOLATILES
WB: SOY F. MESTON SDGK H238J
MCB CAMP PEMOLKTOM
OS/31/94
10/05/92
= HATER PARAMETERS: ANIONS
ROY F. MESTON SDCB H2376
MCB CAHP PENOLBTON
iSESTON MANAGERS
IT CORPORATIOM
REPORT FOR KCB CAHP
10/13/92
00166
02.2
WHIN RECORD PESTICIDES
05/18/94
10/13/92
00166
02.2
HESTON MANAGERS
IT CORPORATION
ADMIN RECORD SBMVOLATILES
SDG» «282 RFH« 9209S779, 9209S909
UBORATORr REPORT FOR HCB CAHP
05/18/94
10/13/92
00166
02.2
NESTON MANAGERS
IT CORPORATION
ADMIN RECORD VOLATUES
OS/18/94
10/13/92
00166
02.2
NESTON
IT CORPORATION
ADMIN RECORD HERBICIDE
SCGt N2282 RFU« 9209S779
05/18/94
10/13/92
00156
02.2
WESTOH MANAGERS
IT CORPORATION
LABORATORY REPORT FOR MCB CAMP
HyDR°c«
9209S179. 9209S909
ADMIN RECORD f5
-------
DATE - 01/24/9*
OIC Ho. DOC.HO. PHC.DATE FKOH "^..^ PENOLETOH »«»I«IUWIVB RECORD FILE INDEX (SORTED K DOC. DATE)
PACE - 42
DOCUHENT.TrPE...
CONTR/CUID. .HO. .
APPRO*. «. OF- PACES
M006B1 OOOB90
DATA
0137
DATA
00)4
DATA
0174 J
DOC. DATE
CTO.HO..
EPA.CAT*
OS/1B/94
10/14/92
00166
02.2
10/14/92
00166
02.2
10/15/92
00166
02.2
05/18/94
FROM. SIGNATURE
TO
TO.SIGHATURE
HESTON MANAGERS
IT CORPORATION
IT CORPORATION
IT CORPORATION
HESTON MANAGERS
SUBJECT CLASSIFICATION KEYWORDS ...sice Loc.tlon
LABORATORY REPORT FOR HCB CAMP PENDLETOH ADHIH RECORD IBTON ADMIN RECORO '«! —
SOCK H2272 RFH» 92095726. 92095748, 9209S76S.3209S780
LABORATORY REPORT FOR HCB CAMP PENDLETON ADMIN RECORD TPH "" •'
TOTAL VOLATILE PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS ANALYSIS
SDG» H2336 RFH» 9209S942.9209S949.9209S957. 9210S004
LABORATORY REPORT FOR MCB CAMP PENDLBTON ADMIN RECORD VOLMILES '
GC/MS VOLATILSS ANALYSIS "«"»!*»
SDQI H2336 RFHI 9209S942, 9209S949. 9209S9S7. 9210S004
LABORATORY REPORT FOR KCB CAMP PENDLETON xnmiM Bprnon 55B — • —
DATA 10/21/92
00166 IT CORPORATION
0090 02.2
TOTAL VOLATILE PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS ANALYSIS
SDG» H2294 RFH» 9209S816.9209S832.9209SI86,9209S910
TPH
-------
DATE - 08/24/98
•WC NO. DOC.NO. PRC.DATE FROM "^ °** PENDLETON «*™ISTRATIVE RECORD FILE INDEX (SORTED BY DOC. DATE)
DOCUMENT. TYPE. .
CONTR/GUID. .NO.
APPROX.i.OF.PAGI
M006B1 000193
DATA
0136
M00661 D00947
DATA
0072
M00661 0009S2
DATA
007S
DATA
0034
DATA
0019
M006B1 001309
DATA
0006
DATA
0052
MOOS81 001312
DATA
0016
DATA
OOOS
H00681 001314
DATA
. DOC. DATE FROH.SIGNATURE. . .
. CTO.NO.. TO
OS/lt/94 HESTON MANAGERS
0016« IT CORPORATION
OS/11/94 HESTON HAMMERS
10/21/93
0016C IT CORPORATION
02-2
10/21/92
00166 IT CORPORATION
02.2
10/21/92
MCB CAMP PENDLETON
02.2
OS/31/94
10/21/92
MCB CAMP PENDLETON
02.2
10/21/92
MCB CAMP PENDLETON
02.2
05/31/94
10/21/92
MCB CAMP PENDLETON
02.2
05/31/94 ""
10/21/92
MCB CAMP PENDLETON
02.2
10/21/92
MCB CAMP PENDLETON
02.2
05/31/94
10/21/92
HCB CAMP PENDLETON
• • • • • SUBJECT
LABORATORY REPORT FOR HCB CAMP PENDLETON
SDGtt H2393 RFWV 923050(4,92105038
TOTAL EXTRACTABLE PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS ANALYSIS
SUCH «22J4 RFW 9209S81«,9209Se32, 920SS«««.9209S910
LABORATORY REPORT FOR MCB CAMP PENDLETON
TOTAL EXTRACTABLE PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS ANALYSIS
SDGI H2336 RFH» »209S942,9209S949,9209S9S7.9201S004
DATA VALIDATION REPORT MCB CAMP PENDLETON "
MATRIX: HATER PARAMETERS: ORGANOCHLORINB PESTICIDES
PCB8 LAB: ROY F. HESTON SDOU S2506
DATA VALIDATION REPORT MCB CAMP PEHDLETON
MATRIX: HATER PARAMETERS: CHLORINATED HERBICIDES
LAB: ROY T. HESTOH SOG» H2S06
DATA VALIDATION REPORT HCB CAMP PENDLETON ~
MATRIX: HATER PARAMETERS: TPH GASOLINE t DIESEL
LAB: ROY F. HESTOH SDG8 M2S06
DATA VALIDATION REPORT HCB CAMP PENDLETON
MATRIX: HATER PARAMETERS: VOLAT1LES
LAB, ROY F. HESTON SDGB S2506
MATRIX: HATER PARWETERS: ANIONS (CHLORIDE. NITRATE-N
NITRITE-N S SULFATE) LAB: ROY F. HESTON SDGH H2S06
DATA VALIDATION REPORT MCB CAMP PENDLETON
MATRIX: HATER PARAMETERS: TOTAL DISSOLVED SOL1DES
LAB: HOY F. HESTON SDGB H2506
DATA VALIDATION REPORT MCB CAMP PENDLETON
MATRIX: WATER PARAMETERS: SEMIVOLATILES
LAB: HOY F. HESTOM SDBK S2S06
ADMIN RECORD
ADMIN RECORD
. ADMIN RECORD
ADMIN RECORD
ADMIN RECORD
ADMIN RECORD
ADMIN RECORD
ADMIN RECORD
ADMIX RECORD
ADMIN RECORD
KEYHORDS ...Site lotion
....„„.„..„ _
VOALTILES "
TEH
TEH ' " :
HATER " • • .
PESTICIDES
PCS
HATER ~~~ —
HERBICIDE
TPH
—
VOLATILES
."" - ~~
MATER
SEMIVOLATILES
PACE • 43
0062
02.2
-------
DATE - 08/24/M
UIC M. DOC.HO. PKC.OATE FROM "C" ""' P£m)LCTOH "HMWTMTIV8 RECORD FILE INDEX (SORTED BY DOC. DATE)
DOCUHENT.TYPB... DOC.DATE FROM.SICNATtmE!'.
COHTR/CUID..NO.. CTO.NO.. TO ' CIIOID—
APPRO*. I. OF. PAGES EPA.CATI TO.SIGHATURE..,.'.'.', SUBJECT CLASSIFICATION
KEY HORDS
•Site Loc-tion
MOOSI1
DATA
0029
001315
05/31/94
10/21/92
02.2
HCB CAMP PENDLETOH LAB: ROY F! HESTM SOG^o!
DATA
0010
MOOC61 i 000951
DATA
0224
DATA
0090
10/22/»2
001(6
02.2
05/18/94
10/22/92
00166
02.2
OS/18/94
10/23/92
00166
02.2
HESTON HAMMERS
IT CORPORATIOH
HESTON HANACERS
IT CORPORATIOH
HESTON HANAGERS
IT CORPORATION
LABORATORY REPORT FOR HCB CAMP PENDLETON ~
ORGANOCHLORINE PESTICIDES ANALYSIS SDGI H2294
RFW8 9209S816,9209S832.S209SB86.9209S»19. 9209S934 '
LABORATORY REPORT FOR HCB CAMP PENDLETON '
ORGANOCHWRINE PESTICIDES ANALYSIS SDG» H2336
RFM 920JSS42. 9209S94 9. 9209S957 , 9201S004 . 9210S015
LABORATORY REPORT FOR HCB CAMP PENDLETON •
INORGANICS CLP ANALYSIS SDQI H2294 RFH» 9209S8K
9209S832,9209S886.9209S910,9209S919,9209S934
ADMIN
ADMIN
PESTICIDES
H00681
DATA
0110
0325
M00461
DATA
0093
M00681
DATA
0162
M00681
DATA
0100
000915
000956
000957
000946
000948
OS/18/94
10/23/92
00166
02.2
05/18/94
10/23/92
00166
02.2
HESTON MANAGERS
IT CORPORATION
HESTON MANAGERS
IT CORPORATIOH
05/18/94
10/J3/92
00166
02.2
HESTOH MANAGERS
IT CORPORATION
05/18/94
10/23/92
00166
02.2
HESTON MANAGERS
IT CORPORATION
05/18/94HESTON MANAGERS
10/26/92
00166 IT CORPORATION
02.2
0100
os/18/94HESTOH MANAGERS
10/28/92
00166 IT CORPORATION
02.2
LABORATORY REPORT FOR HCB CAMP PENDLETON— ADHIM armim"
•.«_«.....« M-u f*. _ «.«,..„__ Afc— nlJHin RECORD
NON CLP ANALYSIS SDGK H2282 RFH» 9209S779,
LABORATORY REPORT
IORGANICS NON CLP ANALYSIS SDG» H2294 RPN8 92095811!
9209S832.920»S88«19209S910.9209S919,9209S934
,9210S01S
-------
DATE - 08/24/98
OIC No. DOC.NO. PHC.DATE FROM "* **"* PEHDtET0'' ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD FILE INDEX (SORTED BY DOC DATE)
DOOWENT.TYPE... DOC.DATE FROMisJGNATURE
CONTR/GUID..NO.. CTO.NO. . TO
BDnDAV u *s\n ««_«_ ._. * ••*•••••*••--... __ _
CLASSIFICATION
PAGE - 45
SUBJECT....
M00681
DATA
0150
H00691
DATA
0150
M00681
DATA
». ut-. PAGES EPA. CATII TO.S1GNATURE. .
OOU87 OS/2S/94 HESTON MANAGERS
10/28/92
00166 IT CORPORATION
02. 2
00118$ 05/26/94 HESTON MANAGERS ~
10/28/92
0,0166 IT CORPORATIOM
02.2
10/28/92
LABORATORY REPORT FOR KCB CAMP PENDLETON
HERBICIDES ANALYSIS SOG* H2294 RFWI 9209816. 92098832^
920SSB86.9209S910.9209S919.9209S934 "•«"»5»M.
LABORATORY REPORT FOR MCB CAMP PENDLETON ~f~
CC/MS SEMIVOLATILES ANALYSIS SDGK H2294 RFHK 92D9S81S
M09SM«.MM»IO.tao»B9M.»20»»J4;t20»SS "'"'
DATA WAUDATIOH REPORT HCB CAMP PENDLETON ~~r~
KEY WORDS
•••Site Location
0037
0072
AEMIH RECORD HERBICIDE
ADMIN RECORD
SEMIVOLATILES
02.2
02.2
MCB CAMP PENDLBTON
HCB CAMP PENDLETON
DATA VALIDATION REPORT HCB CAMP PENDLETON
MATRIX: SOIL I HATER PARAMETERS; SEMIVOLATILES
LABr ROY F. HESTON SDGI H2S55
WATER
SEHIVOLATtLES
0011
H00681
DATA
0037
02.2
HCB CAMP PENDLETOH
DATA VALIDATION REPORT HCB CAMP PENDLETON"
MATRIX: SOIL t HATER PARAMETERS: TPH GASOLINE t
DIESEL LAB: ROY F. HBSTON SDGK H2SS5 WW"Ht *
ADMIN RECORD
DATA VALIDATION REPORT MCB CAMP PENDLETON
PARAMETERS: AN IONS
MCB CAMP PENDLETON
LAB: ROY F. HESTON SDOB W25S5
*WtI*IWI ******
2?S±J!*™: s?f^ PARAMETERS.- TAL METALS .
MCB CAMP PENDLETON
MOLYBDENUM LAB: ROY F. HESTON SDO» H2555
0042
001350
02.2
DATA
00«6
10/28/92
MCB CAMP PENDLETON
02.2
—
^,U'"'IDATION REPORI MCB CMf PENDLETON J5
MATRIX: HATER. SOIL PARAMETERS: VOUTILES
LAB: ROY F. HESTON SDGB N2555
VOLATILES
M006S1 001J52 05/31/94
DATA 10/28/92
02.2
HCB CAMP PENDLETON
REP°RT
W ^AR*HBTERS: ORGANOCHLORINE PESTICIDES
LAB: ROY F. HESTON SDGK H2555
HATER
PESTICIDES
PCB
-------
DATE - 08/24/58
UIC Ho. DOC.NO. PRC.DATB FRCH ?° C"* PEHDLETOH ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD FILE INDEX (SORTED BY DOC. DATE)
DOCTKEHT.TYPE... DOC.DATE FROM-SIGNATURs! '. " "
CONTR/CUID..NO.. CTO.NO.. TO " o,m,-~.
APPROX.I.OF.PACES EPA.CAW TO.SIGHATURE SUBJECT
CLASSIFICATION KEY WORDS
HOOSI1 002216 07/JO/94 ROY F. HSSTON
DATA 10/21/92
ooooooooooooooo ODOOO HCB CAMP PEHDLETON
0001 02.2
002217 07/20/94 HOY P. HESTOfi
DATA 10/21/92
000000000000000 00000 MCB CAMP PENDLETOH
0008 02.2
MATRIX: HATER
PARAMETERS: ALKALINITY
SDG: H2SS5
MATRIX: HATER
PASAMETERS: TOTAL DISSOLVED SOLIDS
SDO: H2S55
ADMIN RECORD
HATER
DATA
OOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
0021
M006U 002279
DATA
000000000000000
0008
HOOS81 002260
DATA
OOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
oooa
M00681002298"
DATA
OOOOOOOOOOOOOOD
0040
M00681002319
DATA
OOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
0011
10/2B/92
00000 HCB CAMP PENDLETON
02.2
97/20/94 ROY p. HESTON""
10/28/92
00000 KCB CAMP PENDLBTON
02.2
07/20/94 ROY P. HESTON
10/21/92
00000 MCfl CAHP PENDLETOH
02.2
07/20/94 ROY F. HESTON
10/2B/92
00000 MCB CAMP PENDLETON
.02.2
07/21/94 ROY F. HESTON
10/28/92
00000 MCB CAMP PENDLETON
02.2
M006J1
DATA
0223
000949 OS/1B/94 HESTON MANAGERS
;iO/29/92
001« IT CORPORATION
02.2
H006I1
DATA
0036
001346
OS/31/94
10/29/92
02.2
CAHP PENDLETOH
H00681 002281
DATA
OOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
0016
07/20/94 ROV F. HESTON
10/29/92
00000 MCB CAHP PENDL6TON
02.2
MATRIX: HATER
PARAMETERS: CHLORINATED HERBICIDES
SDG: H2SSS
MATRIX: HATER
PARAMETERS: TOTAL DISSOLVED SOLIDS
SDG: H2555•
RECORD
-
REC°RD
MATRIX: HATER
PARAMETERS: ANIONS (CHLORIDE, NITRATE-N. NITRATE-N
AND SULFATEI SDG: H25SS
MATRIX: HATER
PARAMETERS: ORGANOCHLORINE PESTICIDES/PCBl
SDG: H2555
MATRIX i HATER AND SOIL
PARWETERS: TAL METALS AND MOLYBDENUM
SDG: H2555
'LABORATORY REPORT FOR MCB CAMP PENDLETON"
GC/MS VOLATILES ANALYSIS SDGM H2294 RFWi Q^nQCAie
9209S8J2,9209S8I6.9209S910.9209S919.9209S9M
ADH1M BFPOBn
AOMTH eKrn..n
ADMIN RECORD
DATA VALIDATION REPORT MCB CAMP PENDLBTOM
MATRIX: SOIL i HATER PARAMETERS: VOLATILES
LAB: ROY F. HESTON SDG» H2582
MATRIX: HATER
PARAMETERS: ANIONS (CHLORIDE. NITRATE-N. NITRATE-N
AND SULFATE) SDC: H25B2
ADMIN RECORD
ADMIN RECORD
HATER
HERBICIDE
HATER
HATER
HATER
PESTICIDES
PCB
HATER
METALS
VOLATILES
HATER
VOLATILES
HATER
PACE -
•Site Location
SOUTHHEST DIVISION
SOITTHHEST DIVISION
SOUTHHEST DIVISION
SOUTHWEST DIVISION
SOUTHHEST DIVISION
SOUTHHEST DIVISION
SOUTHHEST DIVISION
SOUTHHEST DIVISION
-------
DATE - 08/24/98 ,
i
APPROX.K.OP.PABES EPA.CAT*
"" '
M00681 002282
DATA
000000000000000
0001
Sbom oo22»«"
DATA
ooooooooooaoooo
0040
• 07/20/94
10/29/92
00000
02.2
07/2 0/»T
10/2S/92
00000
02.2
ROY F. HESTON
MCB CAMP PEHDUrrOM
ROY P. KESTOH
NC8 CAMP PBNDIETON
SUBJECT
HATOIX: HATER
PARAMETERS: ALKALINITY
BOG: H2582
BY DOC. DATEJ
... CLASSIFICATION KEYWORDS
-
ADMIN RECORD WATER
PACE - 47
BATER AND' SoT
PARAMETERS: SEHIVOLAT1LES
ADHIN RECORD
SEMIVOLATILES
H»5«ll 002289"
DATA
000000000000000
0040
M00681 00229F
DATA
•000000000000000
0007
M0068I 002317
DATA
000000000000000
0010
"07/29/94"
10/29/92
00000
02.2
07/20/94
10/29/S2
00000
.02.2
07/ii/sr
tO/29/32
00000
.02.1
ROY F. HESTON
MCB CAMP PBNDLETON
ROY F~
•KB CAMP PEHDLETOH
ROY F. HESTofi"
MCB CAMP PENDIETON
MATRIX: HATER AND SOIL
ADMIN RECORD HATER~
METALS
M006810012I8~
DATA
0178
M006S1
DATA
000000000000000
004S
M006BI002254"
DATA
000000000000000
D040
~05/27/94 MESTON MANAGERS
11/02/92
001«6 IT CORPORATION
02.2
"07/ao/M ROY F. HESTOii-
11/02/92
00000 MCB CAMP PENDLETON
T7/20/94 ROY F.. HESTON
11/02/92
00000 MCB CAMP PEMDLETON
02.2
^MATRIX: WATER
PARAMETERS: SEMIVOLATILES
SDO: H2590
MATRIX: HATER AND SOIL '
PARAMETERS: TAL METALS MD MOLYBDEN* SDG: H2590
ADMIH RECORD
HATER
SEHIVOLATILES
WATER
METALS
•Sice Location
SOUTHWEST DIVISION
SOUTHWEST DIVISION
H006S1 002281
DATA
000000000000000
000)
ROY P. HBSTON
MCB CAMP PENDLETON
SOOTHHBST DIVISION
SOUTHWEST DIVISION
iOUl'HHEST DIVISION
MESTOH MAMAQERS
IT CORPORATION
ADMIN RECORD PESTICIDE
ADMIN RECORD HERBICIDE
soirrmiesT
SUUTHHEST DIVISION
-------
DATE - 01/21/M
UIC Ho. DOC.NO
DOCUMENT.TYPE. .
COHTR/CUID..HO.
APPROX.I.OF.PAG
H00681 002255
DATA
ooooooooooooooo
oooa
HOOSai 002256
DATA
OOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
0050
M006I1 002292
DATA
ooooooooooooooo
0013
M006B1 0022 95
DATA
OOOOOOOOOOOODOO
0006
M00681 002296
DATA
000000000000000
oooa
H00681 00228?
DATA
000000000000000
0034
M00681 002290
DATA
OOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
0020
SoblSI 00229?
DATA
OOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
0001
M00611 001221
DATA
0192
K006«l 001222
DATA
02SJ
. PRC.DATE FROM... ** ""P PEKDLErof) ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD FUB INDEX (SORTED BY DOC. DATE.
. DOC. DATE FROM. SIGNATURE
. CTO.NO.. TO
ES EPA.CATI TO. SIGNATURE...
••"•••••••»•••••«•••••••••»••••»
07/20/94 ROY F. HESTOH
11/02/92
00000 MCB CAMP PENDLETON
02.2
07/20/94 ROY P. HESTOH
11/02/92
00000 MCB CAHP PENDLETON
02.2
11/02/92
00000 MCB CAHP PENDLETON
02.2
11/02/92
00000 MCB CAMP PENDLETON
02.2
11/02/92
00000 MCB CAHP PENDLETON -
,02.2
11/04/92
00000 MCB CAMP PENDLETON
02.2
;ll/04/92
00000 MCB CAMP PENDLETON
02.2
11/04/92 E.T. BUENCAMINO
00166 SOUTHWEST DIVISION
02.2 CHRIS POTTER
11/05/92
00166 IT CORPORATION
02.2
11/09/92
00166 IT CORPORATION
02.2
PACE
'• CLASSIFICATION KEY WORDS ...Slec ,,„„,,„„
: * ;
MATRIX: WATER AMD SOIL ,-...„ „„
PARAMETERS: TPH GASOLINE AND TPH DIESEL SDC: H2590 ACMIHRECORD J^R SOUTHWEST DIVISION
PARAMETERS: VOLATJLES «;rv. uien>i WATER
aco. H2S90 VOLATILES
MATOTY. M.TCD " — —
PARAMETERS: ANIONS (CHLORIDE. HITRATE-N NITRATE RECORD HATER
PARAMETERS: ALKALINITY ADM"1 RECORD WATER
SDG: W2S90
PARAMETERS: TOTAL DISSOLVED SOLIDS ADMIN RECORD HATER
SDG: W2590
MATRIX: HATER ' mnuiu Pmw —
P™»ETE«S: ORGANOCHLORINE PESTICIDES/PCBS HETORD ^^
PESTICIDES
PARAMOS: URINATED HERBICIDES «» " ~ -gj^ ~
Rl
FS
"^ORATORY REPORT FOR MC« CAMP PENOLETON ADMIN RECORD un, .-„,.;
CLP VOLATILE ANALYSIS SDGK H2383 RFHN 9210S038. VOLATILES
LABORATORY REPORT FOR HCB CAMP PENDLETOM .^... —
ORCANOCHLORINE PESTICIDES ANALYSIs"'sDGIl"w2376 "*"'' *EC°*° PESTICIDES
RFttD 9210S027, 9210S039,9210S065.9210S10i
SOUTHWEST DIVISIOH
SOUTHWEST DIVISION
SOUTHWEST DIVISION
SOUTHWEST DIVISION
SOUTHWEST DIVISION
SOUTHWEST DIVISION
SOUTHWEST DIVISION
-------
DATE - 08/24/98
UIC No. DOC.NO.
DOCUMENT. TYPE...
CONTS/GUID. .NO..
APPROX.H.OP.PAGE
M006I1 001223
DATA
0199
M00681 001227
DATA
0349
DATA
oaoaooooooooooo
0035
H00681 002294
DATA
000000000000000
0019
DATA
01>6
DATA
0173
DATA
34118
0319
DATA
34117
02SS
DATA
032}
MCB CA
PRC.DATE PROM
DOC. DATE FROM. SIGNATURE
CTO.NO.. TO..:..
05/27/94 HESTON MANAGERS
11/09/92
00166 IT CORPORATION'
02.2
11/09/92
00166 IT CORPORATION
02.2
07/20/94 ROY F. HESTON
11/10/92
00000 MCB CAMP PENDLETON
02.2
11/10/92
00000 MCB CAMP PENDLETON
02.2
00166 IT CORPORATION
02.2
11/11/92
00166 IT CORPORATION
02.2
U/12/92 PEGGY A. NORTON
00166 IT CORPORATION
02.2 DAVE MARK
11/12/92 PEGGY A. NORTON
00166 IT CORPORATION
02.2 DAVE MARK
11/13/92
00166 IT CORPORATION
02.2
MP PENDLETON ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD FILE INDEX (SORTED BY
SUBJECT
LABORATORY REPORT FOR MCB CAMP PENDLETON
TOTAL EXTRACTABLE PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS ANALYSIS'
SDGI W2376 RFNI 9210S027, 9210S039. 9210S065.9210S10B
LABORATORY REPORT FOR MCB CAMP PENDLETON
GC/MS VOLATILES ANALYSIS SOCK H2J76 RFHH 9210S027
9210S039,«10S065.9210S10«
MATRIX: WATER '
PARAMETERS: ORGANOCHLORINE PESTICIDES/PCBfl
SDG: H2S90
PARAMETERS: CHLORINATED HERBICIDES
SDG: M2S90
LABORATORY REPORT FOR MCB CAMP PENDLETON
INORGANICS NON CLP ANALYSIS SDGK W2336 RFHD 9209S942
9209S949.9209S957, 92105004, 9210S015
LABORATORY REPORT FOR MCB CAMP PENDLETON
INORGANICS CLP ANALYSIS SDG» H2336 RFH» 9209S942
9209S94 9 , 9209S9S7 . 921 OS004 , 921 OS01S
ANALYTICAL DATA FOR HCB CAMP PENDLETON •
VOLATILES, SEMIVOLATILES. PESTICIDES. PCBs
TFH
ANALYTICAL DATA FOR MCB CAMP PENDLETON
VOLATILES. SEMIVOLATILES. PESTICIDES PCB»,
TFH. HERBICIDES AND METALS
LABORATORY REPORT FOR MCB CAMP PENDLETON ~
CLP SEMI VOLATILES ANALYSIS SDOK H2383 RFH» 9210S038
9210S064
DOC. DATE)
CLASSIFICATION
ADMIN RECORD
ADMIN RECORD
ADMIN RECORD'
ADMIN RECORD
ADMIN RECORD
ADMIN RECORD
ADMIN RECORD
ADMIN RECORD
ADMIN RECORD
KEY WORDS
TEH
TPH
VOLATILBS
MATER
PESTICIDES
PCB
HERBXdDE
IOG
IOG
VOLATILES
SEMIVOALTILES
PESTICIDES
PCB
TFH
VOLATILES
SEMIVOLATILES
PESTICIDES
PCB
TFH
HERBICIDE
METALS
SEMIVOLATILES
PAGE
.--Sice Location
SOUTHWEST DIVISION
SOUTHWEST DIVISION
-------
DATE - OB/2«/Si
UIC Ko. DOC.NO.
DOCUKENT.TYPE. . .
COHTR/GtUD..NO..
PRC.DATB
DOC.DATE
CTO.HO..
.... ...
APPROX.t. OF. PAGES EPA.CAT1
HOOC«l
DATA
0030
FBOM
FROM.SICNATURE!
'
001345
OS/J1/94
11/16/32
pamnoH ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD FILE INDEX (SORTED BY DOC. DATE)
SUBJECT
*"""*"•••«•»»••••»»——»—
.................. ...«.».,.,.„„.„..„..„„„
UIS.!^™*"0!! ".'««'.«» «w P™>"*OH
CLASSIFICATION KEY HORDS
—•••«..«...........,.,«......„
ADHIN RECORD SEHIVOLATILES
PACE
• Site ....... Location ......
H006I1 0022«9
DATA
OOODOOOOOOOOOOO
0036
MATRIX: HATER AHD SOIL
H00681 002270
07/20/94
11/1C/92
00000
02.2
MATRIX: HATER AHD SOIL
PARAMETERS: TPH OASOLINE AND TPH DIESEL
000000000000000
SOUTHWEST DIVISION
HOOSBJ 002271
DATA
000000000000000
oou
PARAMETERS: CHLORINATED HERBICIDES
M006B1 002272
DATA
000000000000000
0013
002273
DATA
ooooooooooooooo
0040
07/20/94
11/1S/92
ooooo
02.2
07/20/94
11/16/92
OOOOO
02.2
ROY F. HESTON
MCB CAMP PEHDLETON
ROY F. BESTON
MCB CAMP PENDLETON
MATRIX: HATER
Si ORGAHOCHLORINE PESTICIDES/PCBs
MATRIX: HATER AND SOIL"
PARAMETERS: SEHIVOLATILES
SDG: H2C30
HATER
PESTICIDES
ADMIN RECORD HATER"
SEHIVOLATILES
DATA
000000000000000
0006
J1/1S/92
OOOOO MCB CAMP PENDLETOH
02.2
MATRIX: HATER
PARAMETERS: TOTAL DISSOLVED SOLIDS
SDG: W262B/M630
S017THHEST DIVISION
SOimiHEST DIVISION
M00601 002299
MATRIX: SOIL
PARAMETERS: TPH GASOLINE AND TPH DIESEL
ooooooooooooooa
MCB CAMP PENDLETON
SOUTHWEST DIVISION
EDO: H2«28
MATRIX:HATER AND SOIL
M006S1
DATA
OOOOOOOOOODOOOO
0040
SOUTHWEST DIVISION
M00681
DATA
OOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
0006
07/20/94
11/16/92
OOOOO
02.2
SOWHMEST DIVISION
SOUTHWEST DIVISION
-------
DATE • 08/24/98
UIC Ho. DOC.NO. PRC.DATE FROM "^ ^ PEHDLET°11 »»«NrSTRATIVE RECORD FILE INDEX (SORTED BY DOC. DATE)
DOCUMENT. TYPE. .
COHWCUID..NO.
APPROX.J.OF.PAG
«*.•«••*««»«•••
M00681 002303
DATA
000000000000000
0011
DATA
000000000000000
0030
M00681 002H6
DATA
ooooooooooooooo
0010
DATA
Dill
DATA
0098
M00681 000875
DATA
0072
M006B1 000873
DATA
0232
H00681 000999
DATA
34237
017«
M00681 000999
DATA
34218
0215
DATA
. 'DOC. DATE FROM. SIGNATURE. . .
. CTO.NO. . TO
07/20/94 ROY F. HESTON
11/16/92
00000 MCB CAMP PENDLETON
, 02.2
07/20/94 ROY F. HESTON
11/16/92
00000 MCB CAMP FENDLETON
02.2
07/21/94 ROY F HESTON
11/16/92
00000 MCB CAMP PENDL6TOH
02.2
05/18/94 HESTON MANAGERS
11/17/92
'00166 IT CORPORATION
02.2
OS/18/94 HESTOH MANAGERS
11/17/92
0016« IT CORPORATION
02.2
11/17/92
0016S IT CORPORATION
02.2
11/17/92
00166 IT CORPORATION
02.2
11/17/92
OOU« IT CORPORATION
02.2
11/17/92
00166 IT CORPORATION
02.2
11/18/52
• SUBJECT : nxecTpifni.™
MATRIX: HATER
STS,TERS: *NIMB fCHLOR1°B, NITRATE-N. WJTRATE-N REC°m
AND SULFATE) SDO: H26SB/H2630
MATRIX: SOIL •
PARAMETERS: VOLATILES RECORD
SDG: M2628
MATRIX: HATER AND SOIL ACMTM ppr-nor.
PARAMETERS: TAL METALS AND MOLYBDENUM
SDG: W262S/H2630
LABORATORY REPORT FOR HCB CAMP PENDLBTON ADMIN RECORD
BORON ANALYSIS ; .MMIH RECORD
SDGB 1)2282 & H2294 RFM 9209S779, 9209S616. 9209S132
LABORATORY REPORT FOR MCB CAMP PENDLETON ADM1M RECOBn
BORON ANALYSIS W"N RECORD
SDGtt H2272 HFB» 920JS726.9209S748, 9209S765.9209S780
LABORATORY REPORT FOR MCB CAMP PENDLETON ADMIN RECORD
BORON ANALYSIS «*IIN RECORD
SDCB W2206 RFHN 9208S59S,3208S«74.9209S697, 9209S7U
LABORATORY REPORT FOR MCB CAMP PENDLETON APMIM BEmBn
CLP/GCMS/SEMIVOLATILE ANALYSIS RECORD
SDGd W2582 RFH* 9210S249, 920S278, 9210S292. 9211S306
WiAUTTICAL DATA FOR MCB CAMP PENDLETON ADMIN RECORD
VOLATILES. SEMIVOLATILES. TFH, METALS RECORD
AHALYTICAL DATA FOR MCB CAHP PEHDLETON - ADMIN REfOBn
VOLATILES, SEMIVOLATILES. TFH, METALS °
LABORATORY REPORT FOR MCB CAMP PENDLETON ADMIN RECORD*
VOLATILE Pimnp»mr DC-TDO, r... ,„,_„ ... .. «jnin HHI.UKU
PAGE
» KEYWORDS ...Siee Location. ......
WATER SOUTHWEST DIVISION
VOLATILES — —
HATER * " ~ — ~" — — — «.
METALS
DATA ' ' — — •
DATA -
DATA " - - -
SEMIVOIAT1LE \ — ~ —
VOLATILES —
SEHIVOLATILES
TFH
METALS
VOLATILES '
SEMIVOLATILES
TFH
METALS
VOLATILES " ~ ' —
0274
0016S IT CORPORATION
02.2
«v«'u^ir.« .—nwnour) HYDROCAHBONS ANALYSIS
SDG* M2S82 RFHR 9210S249.9210S292.9210S278.9210S306
-------
DATE - 01/24/98
UlC (to. DOC.NO. PRC.DATB
DOCUMENT. TYPE... DOC.DATE
COMTB/CUID..HO.. CTO.NO
APPBOX.I.OF.PACES EPA.CATg
FROM ^.^ PM>"™< ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD FILE 1KDEX (SORTED
FROH.SIGNATURE
TO
TO. SIGNATURE.'"I;;!.' SUBJECT
BV DOC. DATE)
CLASSIFICATIOH KEy HORDS
HOOfll
DATA
0314
HOoliT
DATA
000858
000859
05/18/M
U/1J/J2
00166
02.2
PACE . 52
•site Location
OJS7
MOOS91
DATA
000855
0171
~os/n/9«T
11/19/92
00165
02.2
^JS/18/94
11/20/92
00166
02.2
KESTOH HAHAOERS
IT CORPORATION
'WJSTON MAHACERF
IT CORPORATION
"WESTON MANAGERS'
IT CORPORATION
RFNI »210S24J.»,1S27,.M11S292.92HS306
RECORD VOLATILES
SDG» H2376 RFUR 9210S027,92IOS039.9210SO«S.9210S10.
RECORD
METALS ANALKIS
SDCI W23B3 RFW« 9210S038. 9210SD64
RECORD loo"
METALS
WESTOH MANAGERS
IT CORPORATION
SDGI H2383 RFW» 9210S038.9210SOS4
OS3S
0354
H00681
DATA
34267
0223
M006B1
DATA
34314
0191
001141
OS/18/94
U/20/92
00166
02.2
05/18/94
U/20/92
00166
02.2
OS/25/ 94~
11/23/92
02.3
HESTON MANAGERS
IT CORPORATION
"NESTOR MANAGERS
IT CORPORATION
CH2H HILL
tSOOl A. NORTON
IT CORPORATION
DAVE MARK
LABORATORY REPORT FOR HCB CAMP"
GC/MS SEMIVOLATILE ANALYSIS
SDOd H2S06 RFHf »210S1S4,9210S192.9210S219.9210S248
SEMIVOLATILES
SDG» H250S RFW, 9210SIS4 . 9210S192. 9J1OSZ19. 9210S248
ANALYTICAL DATA FOR MCB CAMP
VOLATILES.
017S
0178
OS/2S/94 CH2M HILL
11/23/92 PEOC1T A. NORTON
IT CORPORATION
02.2 DAVE MARK
"001146OV2S/S4 CH2HHILL"
11/23/92 PEGGV A. NORTOH
IT CORPOR,
02.2 DAVE MARK
TON
, SEMIVOLATILES. TFH, METALS
ANALYTICAL DATA FOR HCB CAMP
VOLATILES.
ADMIH RECORD
ADMIN RECORD
ADMIN RECORD
VOLATILES"
SEMIVOLATILES
TFH
METALS
VOLATILES
SEHIVOLATILES
TFH
METALS
VOLATILES
SEMIVOLATILES
TFH
001185 OS/36/94 HESTON MANAGERS
11/24/92
00166
02 2
-------
DATE - 08/24/98
UIC Ho. DOC.KO.
DOCUMENT.TYPE. . .
CONTR/GUID..NO..
MCB
PRC.DATE FROM... :
DOC. DATE FROM. SIGNATURB
CtO.NO.. TO
CAMP PENDLETON ADMtNISTkATlVE RECORD FILE INDEX (SORTED
BY DOC. DATE)
PAGE - 55
APPRO*.«.OF.PA
-------
DATE . 01/34/91
UICHo. DOC.HO. PRC.DATE FROM "^
DOCOHENT.TYPE... DOC.DATB FROM.SIGNATURE. .
COKTR/CUID..NO.. CTO.NO.. TO
APPHOX.K.OF.PAGES EPA.CAT* TO.SIGNATIJRE" "
......... ••«-...........«.«....„.„....__,_
H006I1 001152 05/25/91 CH2H HILL
?J™. 11/30/92 PEOOY A. NORTON
„"" °°l«« IT CORPORATION
°239 02.2 DAVE HARK
DATA 11/30/92
M 00'6« IT CORPORATION
M006S1 001194 05/27/94 HESTON MANAGERS'"
DATA 11/30/92
MS7 °°"S IT CORPORATION
MOOHl 000918 05/18/94 HESKW MANAGERsT"
DATA 12/01/92
•MM* 001SS IT CORPORATION
0406 02.2
Muooi UUOBSZ 05/18/S4 IIESTON MANAGERS
DATA 12/02/92
„,,.. 001« IT CORPORATION
0124 02.2
H00681 000863 05/U/94 HESTON MANAGERT"
OATA 12/02/92
flo68 . 0016S IT CORPORATION
M00681 000864 05/18/94 IIESTON MANAGERS
DATA 12/02/92
„,,„ °°»6 IT CORPORATION
0110 02.2
H00481 0008C5 OS/18/94 HESTON MANAGERS
DATA 12/02/92
0328 . oT*' "CORPORATION
M006I1 000861 05/18/97 HESTON MANAGERS
DATA 12/03/92
00166 IT CORPORATION
0252 02.2
M00681 000982 OS/18/94 MESTOM HANACJERS
DATA 12/OJ/92
""4 00«S IT CORPORATIOW
0069 02.2
(
CAHP KWIRDH ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD FILE INDEX (SORTED BY DOC DATi
:::: SOIJECT • CL^U
• ..«
V^T,1^ MTA F°R KCB CWP PE»LETON MHJ.. „
VOUTILES. PESTICIDES, PCS.. TFH. HERBICIDES ^"H R
nbJAio
CLP ORGANOCHLORINE PESTICIDES ANALYSIS SDGJT W2506 ADHIK RE
LmrtTTXTno V"^?L..— •.- ^T^~ ^_ —
uran'i*™ * vn i ncrrjnx r OR HCB CAHP PENDLETOM '
CLP OROAHOCHLORINE PESTICIDES ANALYSIS SDGI W25S1 ADMIN RE
RFMII 9210S237, 9210S307
AHM.VT^rm, PATA POn MM <~»nn Dcurvrp^vi;; — —
VOLATILES PKNULfclUN „,„!,, RE(
CLP/GC/KS SEHIVOLATILEHAHALWISPEMDLET°1' "*"" REC
SDG» H2582 (ADDITION! RFM» 9211S358
SS^^l^""'5«ss: ^"s« ""* RK
LABORATORY REPORT FOR MCB CAMP PENDLEToF u^^i tfgp;
CLP/GC/MS VOLATILE ANALYSIS ^IN RECt
SDGK H25S2(ADDITIONAL| Rnj» 9211S358
^J*TORV RETO'"' pO" «CB CAMP PENDLETON APHIH RECC
SDGI S2S90 RFHI 9211S277. 9211S359.9211S370. 9211S400
LABORATORY RErORT FOB urn "jiTui, " ~™
TOTAL EXTRACTABLE HmoCA^SJJs ^^s" "*'" REC°
SDG« K2S06 RFMI 9210S192.9210S219,9210S248
INORGflNIC HCB CWIP PENDLETON ADMIN RECO
(
| PACE .
•CATION KEYWORDS ...Slte ^^
CORD VOLATILES
PESTICIDES
PCS
TFH
HERBICIDES
METALS
CORB PESTICIDES —
"ORD PESTICIDES " ~ —
•ORD vbljiTILES " — —
)RD VOLATILE " — ~ ~ ~
RD VOLATILES "
.D tog —
(
-------
DATE - 08/24/98
UIC No. DOC.NO. PRC.DATE FROM . "^ ^ l'ENDLE'rON MH'NISTRATIVE RECORD FILE !NDEX (SORTED BV DOC DATE
DOCUMENT.TYPE. . . DOC.DATE FROM.SIGNATUHE. . . .
COWTR/GUID. .NO. . CTO.BO. . TO. ..'.....'
APPROX.d. OF. PAGES EPA CATi TO SIGNATURE
KOOS81 000997 ; OS/11/94 HESTON MANAGERS
DATA , 12/03/92
3*» , HV * ^ n*u
""* • 12/03/92 PEGGY A. NORTON
„,,„ «<>» F. HESTON, INC
0072 ,02.2 KELLY MORGAN
MOOS81 001000 ;05/l«/94 HESTON MANAGERS
DATA i 1J/04/92
3"7S .,00166 IT CORPORATION
0267 J02.2 -
j
HUU6B1 001017 05/18/94 HESTON MANAGERS
DATA '12/04/92
*?*** ««»«« IT CORPORATION
0382 ;02.2 DAVK MARK
M006B1 00083B OS/17/94 HESTON MANAGERS
DATA 12/07/92
00166 IT CORPORATION
0514 02.2
M00681 000939 05/17/91 HESTOH MANAGERS
DATA 12/07/92
00166 IT CORPORATION
0168 OZ|2
M00681 OUpDtfc OS/18/94 HESTON MANAGERS
"A™ 12/07/92
,,,. <>01«s IT CORPORATION
032« 02.2
H006B1 000942 05/18/94 HESTON MANAGERS
DATA 12/08/92
001«6 IT CORPORATION
0216 02.2
MOOS81 000943 OS/H/94 HESTON MANAGERS
DATA 12/08/92
00166 IT CORPORATION
0218 02.2
SUBJECT CLASSIPI
""***** *****•*• "S"*'"""««»»**"»»**»»«»»M-»- fmmmtfm ••*•••*•*.««.
HETALSIC*L DAT* F°R MCB CWP PEMI'LETO(' ADMIN RE
REFERENCE'NO*^™ JACOBS E"011*66"^, LRD LAB ADMIN RE
ANALYTICAL DATA FOR KCB CAMP PENDLETON ~~~ AHMTM DP~
HERBIC1DES SID"VO"TrLES- TPH- METALS, PESTICIDES, PCB
ANALYTICAL DATA FOR MCB CAMP PENDLETON Mmlll HFr
VOUTILES, SEMIVOLATILES EC
"MORATORY REPORT FOR HCB CAMP PENDLETOW ~ ^= •
GC/MS VOLATILE ANALYSIS SOflT WSM " RB-°
R«S» 9211S277.9211S359, 92113370,92115400
LABORATORY REPORT FOR MCB CAMP PENDLETON ~ tntru op/3
OC/HS SEMIVOLATILE ANALYSIS SDGD W62sT ***
RFH» 9211S401.9211S41]
LABORATORY REPORT FOR MCB CAMP PENDLETON *nMTM ppM
TOTAL EXTRACTABLE HYDROCARBONS SDGI H2555 «""»" «.«
RF»» 9210S237,9210S265,9211S293,»Z11S307,9211S323
S i«,r^2?BLE PETSOLEW' MVDROCARBONS ANALYSIS
SDOt H2630 RFH« 9J11S4C2.9211S414
'^"ORATORY RErORT FOR MCn'riliP 'bt'uiii nwivi —
ORGANOCHLORINE PESTICIDES ANALYSIS SDGK W590 R C°
RFH« 9211S3S9,9211S370
. — __ — ,
*• Jr
. PAGE
NATION KEY WORDS r<-
~i« RUKUA ...Site Location
"""*"""*""'-m.m.,mmmmMmm,^,mmm,m.mmm,fl_f_m
:ORD METALS
ORD DATA
DISPOSAL
HAZ HASTE
ORD VOLATILES ~
SEMIVOLAT1LES
TFH
METALS
PESTICIDES
PCB
HERBICIDE
«5 VOLATILES ~ —
SEMI VOLATILES
RD VOLATILE "'" .
R?~ SEMIVOLATILE '
RD VOLATILES ' — •
(D PESTICIDES ~
-------
DATS - 01/24/91
UtCHo. DOC.NO. PRC.DATE
"OCWENT.TYPE... DOC.DATE
CONTR/CUID. .HO.. CTO.NO..
APPROX.S.OF.PftGES EPA.CATI
H006S1 0009SO 05/18/31
DATA- 1J/08/9J
001G6
0349 02.2 '
0223
000967 05/18/94
12/01/92
00166
02.2
«OH
FROH.SIGHATURE..
TO
TO.S10NATURE...
HESTON MANAGERS
IT CORPORATION
HESTOH MANAGERS
IT CORPORATION
PEHDLETOS ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD FILE INDEX (SORTED BY DOC. DATE)
• SUBJECT
CLASSIFICATION KEY HORDS
PACE - S6
•..Site.
.Location
LABORATORY REPORT FOR HCB CAMP
«/« SEHIVOUTILE ANALYSIS SDG,
REPORT Folt ** CAMP
9211S402.
•»«
ADMIN RECORD SEMIVOLATILBS
ADMIN RECORD PESTICIDES"
052S
013S
000835
000959
05/17/94
12/09/92
00166
02.2
05/18/J4
12/09/92
00166
02.2
WESTON MANAGERS
IT CORPORATION
"ESTOH MANAGERS
IT CORPORATION
LABORATORY REPORT FOR MCB CAMP PENDLEToST
CC/te SBMIVOLATILE ANALYSIS SDC» M5W
RFW» 9211S277.9I11S3S9. 9211S370.9Z11S400
ADMIN RECORD
LABORATORY REPORT FOR MCB CAMP PENDLPTnil" —
«us«T V°"TILE ^«<™™T«™m 92US401. *BHI" *fCORD
SEMIVOLATI1ES
TFH
HERBICIDE
METALS
"SEMIVOLATILE
VOLATILES
OS/17/94
12/10/92
00166
02.2
HESTOH MANAGERS
IT CORPORATION
REPORT FOR HCB CAMP PENDLETON
ADMIN RECORD TEH
LABORATORY REPORT FOR MCB CAMP PENDLBTOf
0245
05/18/94
•12/14/92
ODltC
02.2
MBSTON MANAGERS
IT CORPORATIOM
"WRATORV HEPOk! tOK KCB CAMP PENDLETOH
HERBICIDES ANALYSIS SDG9 H250« RFHI 9210S192
ADMIN RECORD HERBICIDE"
«ESTON MANAGERS
IT CORPORATION
WBORATORY REPORT FOR HCB CAMP PENDLETON
-------
DATE - 08/54/98
.
uIC No. DOC.KO. * PRC.DATE FROM
PENDLETON ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD FILE INDEX (SORTED BY DOC. DATE)
PACE - 57
DOCtlHEHT.TYPE...
COWTR/CUID..NO..
H006I1 0009SS
DATA
0353
DATA
0114
DATA
000000000000000
001S
DATA
0302
DATA
0205
DATA
0008
DATA
0)76
DATA
0425
DATA
0387
DATA '
0292
, DOC. DATE
JCTO.HO. .
> EPA. CAT*
OS/H/94
13/14/92
001(6
102.3
,12/15/92
-00166
J02.2
.12/16/92
00166
J02.2
12/17/92
001C6
02.2
12/17/92
00166
02.2
12/17/92
166
02.2
12/11/92
00166
02.2
12/22/92
00166
02.2
12/22/92
00166
02.2
OS/17/94
12/22/92
00166
02.2
FROM . SIGNATURE
TO...
TO. SIGNATURE
HESTOU MANAGERS
IT CORPORATION
IT CORPORATION
HCB CAMP PENDLETON
IT CORPORATION
IT CORPORATION
MCB CAMP PENDLETON
IT CORPORATION
IT CORPORATION
IT CORPORATION
HESTON MANAGERS
INCORPORATION
SUBJECT CLASSIFICATION KEYWORDS
-------
DATE - OB/24/J8
UIC Ho. DOC.HO. PRC.DATE
DOCUMENT. TYPE... DOC. DATE
cona/ooio. .HO. . CTO.NO.
APWWX.I.OF.PACES EPA.CATS
MOOCH
DATA
0316
H00681
DATA
0247
H00681
DATA
0442
OOOB44
000961
05/17/54
12/22/92
OOH6
02.2
05/18/94
12/22/92
00166
02.2
HCH
FROM ............
FROH.SIGNATURE!.
TO ............
TO.SIOHATUHB _____
HESTOH MANAGERS
IT CORPORATION
HESTOH MANAGERS
IT CORPORATION
CAMP PENDLETON ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD FILE INDEX (SORTED BY ^ MTE}
PAGE . 58
CLASSIFICATION KEY WORDS
•Site Location
LABORATORY REPORT FOR MCB CAMP PENDLETON
CLP/INORGANIC METALS ANALYSIS r""J"t™'
SDGI H25SS RFBI 9210S237.9210S26S,9211S293.9211S307
LABORATORY REPORT FOR MCB CAHP PENDLETON
CLP INORGANICS METALS ANALYSIS SDG« H2506
RFH* 9210S192.9210S219,9210S24B
ADMIN RECORD
ADHIN RECORD
100
METALS
000962
05/18/94
12/22/92
001S6
02.2
HESTON MANAGERS
IT CORPORATION
H00681
DATA
0276
0291
M00681
DATA
0390
000)23
000919
05/17/94
12/J3/92
00166
02.2
05/17/94
12/29/92
00166
02.2
05/17/94
12/29/92
00166
02.2
HESTION MANAGERS
IT CORPORATIOH
«ESTION MANAGERS"
IT CORPORATION
WESTION MANAGERS
IT CORPORATION
l^BORATORY REPORT FOR MCB CAMP PENDLETON
INORGANICS NOH CLP ANALYSIS
RFW« 9210S237.9210S293.9211S293. 92115307,92115323
HERBICIDES ANALYSIS SDG» N2630
92US402.9211S411
0363
03C2
LABORATORY REPORT FOR MCB CAMP PEHDtETON"
OtVlMMMICS METALS ANALYSIS SKHM«582
HUM J210S249.92HS278. 921,8292.931,830692118358
LABORATORY REPORT FOR MCB CAMP PENDLETON
INORGANICS NON CLP ANALYSIS
RFM 9210S249.92US278<9211S292,92nS30S,9311S3S8
LABORATORY REPORT FOR HCB CAMP PENDLETON
*CLP AH*L¥SIS«»'"™
. 9211S3S9. 9211S370. 92US400
REPORT FOR MCB CAMP PENDLBTOH'
9211S277,9211S359.9211S37fl 921IS400
ADMIN RECORD
JOQ
IOG
METALS
VOLATILES
SEM1VOWTILES
PESTICIDES
MOUM1 OOD820 BS/17/94 HESTIOM MANAGERS
LABORATORY REPORT FOR MCB CAHP PENDLETOM
INORGANICS CLP ANALYSIS SDGI
-------
DATE - 08/24/98
UIC No. DOC. NO. PRC.DATS
EOCUMENT. TYPE. . . DOC. DATE
CONTH/GUID. .NO. . CIO. NO. .
APPROX.t. OF. PAGES ,'EPA.CATK
• • B :|
H00681 OOOB25
DATA
0212
DATA
34515
0061
DATA
34563
0245
DATA
345*3
0214
DATA
34633
0241
DATA
34652
0226
DATA
34688
0277
05/17/94
12/31/92
,00166
'02.2
12/31/92
00166
02.2
12/31/92
00166
02.2
12/31/92
00166
02.2
01/04/93
00166 .
02.2
01/15/93
00166
02.2
01/18/93
00166
02.3
r ' HCB
FROM
FROM.SICNATTJRE..
TO....
TO. SIGNATURE
MESTION MANAGERS
IT CORPORATION
PEGGY A. NORTON
IT CORPORATION
DAVE MARK
CH2M HILL
PEGGY A. NORTON
IT CORPORATION
DAVE MARK
PEGGY A. NORTON
IT CORPORATION
DAVE MARK
IT CORPORATION
NESTON MANAGERS
IT CORPORATION
IT CORPORATION
CAMP PENDLETON ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD FILE INDEX (SORTED BY DOC. DATEI
SUBJECT CLASSIFICATION
LABORATORY REPORT FOR MCB CAMP PENDLETON MMIN RECORD
INORGANICS NQN CLP ANALYSIS SDCH H262S 1 H2630
RFHB 9Z11S401.9211S4D2.9211S413. 92115414
LABORATORY REPORT FOR MCB CAMP PENDLETON AOMIN RECORD
VOLATILES SBHIVOLATILES
LABORATORY REPORT FOR HCB CAHP PENDLETON ADMIN RECORD
VOLATILES SEMIVOUTILES, PESTICIDES, PCB, HERBICIDES
TFH
LABORATORY REPORT FOR MCB CAMP PENDLETON ADMIH RECORD
VOLATILES SEMIVOLATILES, PESTICIDES, PCB, HERBICIDES
TFH, METALS
ANALYTICAL DATA FOR MCB CAHP PENDLBTOH ADMIN RECORD
TFH, VOLATILES, SEMIVOLATILES, PESTICIDES, PCB
HERBICIDES, METALS
ANALYTICAL DATA FOR MCB CAMP PENDLETON ADMIN RECORD
VOLATILES, SEMIVOLATILES, PESTICIDES, PCB. TFH. HERBICIDES
METALS
ANALYTICAL DATA FOR MCB CAMP PENDLETON ADMIN RECORD
VOLATILES, SEMIVOLATILES. PESTICIDES, PCB TFH.
HERBICIDES, METALS :
PACE
IOG
VOLATILES
SEMIVOLATILES
VOLATILES ~ ~ "
SEMIVOLATILES
PESTICIDES
PCB
HERBICIDE
TFH .
VOLATILES " ~
SEMIVOLATILES
'PESTICIDES
PCB
HERBICIDE
TFH
METALS
TFH
VOLATILES
SEMIVOLATILES
PESTICIDES
PCB
HERBICIDE
METALS
VOLATILES
SEMIVOLATILES
PESTICIDES
PCB
TFH
HERBICIDE
METALS
PESTICIDES
PCB
TFH
HERBICIDE
METALS
VOLATILES
SEMIVOLATILES
59
-------
DATE - (H/24/J8
UrCKo. DOC.HO. PXC.DATE FROM
DOOJWiJii'.TYPE. D
-------
DATE - 09/24/94 '
UIC No. DOC.NO.
DOCUMENT.TYPE...
CONTR/GUrD. .NO..
'
^RC.DATE FROM.
; DOC. DATE FROM. SIGNATURE
iCTO.NO.. TO
APPROX.l OF. PACES; EPA. CATS TO.SIGNATURE
"** PENDLET°M *»«NISTRATIVE RECORD FILE INDEX (SORTED By DOC. DATE)
SUBJECT CLASSIFICATIOH
PAGE • £1
KEY HORDS
...Site Location
M006B1 002342 i07/21/94 ESE
"ATA 102/03/93
000000000000000 '00146 MCB CAMP PENDLETOH
0019 02.2
PARAMETERS: TRIAZ1HE PESTICIDES CASE NUMBER; NACP54E
SDG: G3S419 AND G3S426
ADMIN RECORD
H006J1 002364 07/JJ/94 ESE '
DATA 02/03/93
000000000000000 ,001«« HCB CAHP PEHDLETOH
0015 '03.2
MATRIX i HATER ~'
PARAMETERS: GENERAL CHEMISTRY CASE: NACPH8D
SDO:G3«S26,G3644«.C36442.G36029.G3S334.G3S493.035103
Hooeai 00236s 07/21/94 ESE
DATA 02/03/93
000000000000000 00166 HCB CAMP PENDLETON
0011 ' 02.2
PARAMETERS: CARBAMATE/UREA PESSTICIDES CASE: NACPS4E
SDG: G35299 AND C3S301
AOMIN RECORD
ADMIN RECORD
H0068100239307/22/94 ESE
DATA 02/03/93
•000000000000000 00166 MCB CAMP PENDLETON
0032 02.2
MATRIX: NATER
PARAMETERS: PEST1CIDES/PCB«
SDO: G3S671 AND G36S19 CASE: NACPW8D
ADMIN RECORD
M00681 002397 07/22/94 ESE
DATA 02/03/93
000000000000000 ' 00166 MCB CAMP PENDLETON
0015 02.2
MATRIX: NATER
PARAMETERS: CARBANATE/UREA PESTICIDES
SDG: 035284 AND GJ5941 CASE: MACW7G
AOMIN RECORD
H006JI 002399 07/22/9* ESE '•
DATA 02/03/93
000000000000000 00166 MCB CAMP PENDLETON
0022 02.2
MATRIX: HATER CASE: NACPtOD
PARAMETERS: TRIAZINE PESTICIDES
SDG: G35408 AND G36215
ADMIN RECORD
H006S1 002441
DATA
000000000000000
0020
07/22/94 ESE
02/03/93
00166 MCB CAMP PENDLETOH
02.2
MATRIX: HATER ' '
PARAMETERS: CHLORINATED HERBICIDES CASE- NACPH8D
SDG: 0353)3,036167
ADMIN RECORD
PESTICIDES
WATER
PESTICIDES
WATER
HATER
PESTICIDES
PCS
HATER
PESTICIDES
HATER
PESTICIDES
HATER
HERBICIDE
SOUTHWEST DIVISION
DATA
ooooooooooooooo
0021
02/04/91
00164
02.2
HCB CAMP PENDLETON
MATRIX: HATER
PARAMETERS: SEMIVOLATILES
SDG: 36078
ADMIB RECORD HATER ' '
SEMIVOLATILES
002374
DATA
OOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
0.030
07/21/94 CH2M HILL
05/04/93
00166 MCB CAMP PENDLETOH
02.2
MATRIX: SOIL AND HATER
PARAMETERS: TCL METALS HI TO MOLYBDENUM
SDG: 35104
ADMIN RECORD
HATER
METALS
M006B1 002396 07/22/94 ESE
DATA 02/04/93
ooooooooooooooo ooise MCB CAMP PENOLETON
0015 02.2
MATRIX: HATER ' '
PARAMETERS: TPH-CASOLINE AND TPH-DIESEL
SDG: G35304 CASE: NACPH7G
ADMIN RECORD
HATER
FUEL
-------
DATE - 08/24/JI
UIC HO. DOC.NO.
DOCUHENT.TYPE.. .
CONTR/GUID. .NO. .
PRC.DATE
DOC.DATE
CTO.NO..
.......
FROM. SIGNATURE
H00««l 002246
DATA
0006
PENDLETON ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD FILE INDEX (SORTED BY DOC. DATE)
SUBJECT
CLASSIFICATION KEYWORDS
•
PACE - 62
MOOMl 00227T
DATA
0004
07/20/94
02/10/93
02.2
07/20/94"
02/10/93
02.2
•Sl'e Location
ROY F. HESTOH
MCB CAMP PENDLETON
ROY F, HESTOH
MCB CAMP PENDLETON
MATRIX: HATER AM) SOIL
CLP METJ>LS ««> MOLYBDENUM SDG: H2666
RECORD HATER
METALS
MATRIX: HATER AND SOIL —-—-
PARAMETERS: TPH GASOLINE AND TPH DIESEL SDG: «S6S ADMIH RECORD HATER-
FUEL
M006I1002249
DATA
000000000000000
0010
main 0022*1
DATA
0009
I 07/20/94
:02/10/»3
;00000
.02.2
07/20/94
02/11/93
02.2
ROY F. HESTON
MCB CAMP PENDLETON
ROY F. HESTON
MCB CAMP PENDLETON
MATRIX: HATER AMD SOIL
PAHW1ETERS: SEMIVOLATILES
SDG: N26E6
MHItl RECORD
HATER
SEMIVOLATILES
MATRIX: HATER AND SOIL
PARAMETERS: CLP METALS AND MOLYBKEKUM SDG: H2684 *Mll"tECMD
HATER
HOOdl 0022SO
DATA
ooooooooooooooo
0008
07/20/94
02/11/93
00000
02.2
Sooiai 002251
DATA
ooooooooooooooo
0004
M00681 002252
DATA
000000000000000
oooa
H00691 000830
DATA
34729
0147
07/20/94
02/11/93
00000
02.2
07/20/94
02/11/93
00000
02.2
HOY F. HESTON
MCB CAMP PENDLETON
ROY F. HESTON"
MCB CAMP PENDLETON
MATRIX: WATER AND SOIL -
PARAMETERS: TPH GASOLTNE AND TPH DIESEL SDG: H2«84 """
MATRIX- HATER AND SOIL
PARAMETERS: SEMIVOLATILES
SDG: H2G84
ADMIH RECORD
HATER
FUEL
HATER
SEMIVOLATILES
M00«81 000832
DATA
34721
0326
05/17/94
02/12/93
00166
03.2
CH2M HILL
PEGGY A. NORTON
IT CORPORATION
DAVE HARK
VOLATILES
SEMIVOLATILES
PESTICIDES
pea
TFH
METALS
HERBICIDE
SOUTHHEST DIVISION
SOUTHWEST DIVISION
SOUTHWEST DIVISION
CH2M MILL
PEGGY A. NORTON
IT CORPORATION
DAVE HARK
LABORATORY REPORT FOR MCB CAMP PETOLBTOM
-------
DATE - 08/24/98 '
OIC HO. DOC.HO-. , PRC.DATE FROM «CB CAMP PEMDLETOM ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD FILE INDEX (SORTED 91 DOC. DATE)
DOCUMENT.T*PE... DOC. DATE FROM. SIGNATURE. '.'.'.'.'
CONTR/GUID. .NO.. CTO.NO.. TO
PAGE - $3
APPROX
DATA
34(81
0328
.K.OF.PAGES EPA.CATK TO.SIGHATURE ' »U*»W.T.
i °°0<133 n'la'in KGGIYHAUWT«, '"«»«««» «w« «* HCB CAHP PENDLBTOH
ft •* ^^ ^^ VOLAT* LbSt SEMIVOLATILES, PESTICIDES PCB TFH
02.2 DAVE MARK
••" • --^ —
CLASSIFICATION KEYWORDS ...Site... . Location
ADMIN RECORD VOLATILES
SEMIVOLATILES
PESTICIDES
PCB
TFH
METALS
HERBICIDE
DATA
0028
M00681
DATA
0027
02/12/93
HCB CAMP PENDIETON
02.2
07/20/94 BOY F. HESTON"
02/12/9J
MCB CAMP PENDLETOH
02.2
MATRIX: SOIL
PARAMETERS: SEMIVOLATILES
SDG: H2684
MATRIX: SOU.
PARAMETERS: VOLATILES
SDG: H2684
M00681
DATA
OOOS
M00661
DATA
0030
002244
002245
07/20/94 ROY F. HBSTOM
02/12/SJ
MCB CAMP PEMDLETOH
02.2
07/20/94 ROY F. WESTOM
02/12/93
MCB CAMP PBNDLETON
03.2
MATRIX: HATER AND SOIL
PARAMETERS: TPH GASOLINE AMD TPH DIESEL SDO: H26«4
MATRIX:HATER AND SOIL
PARAMETERS, CLP METALS AND MOLYBDENUM SDG: K2684
M0068S 002343
DATA
000000000000000
0050
07/21/94 ESE
02/1S/S3
00166 MCB CAMP PENDLETOM
02.2
MATRIX: HATER
PARAMETERS: VOLATILES CASE NUMBER: KACPH5E
SDG: G35790. G35792. G35793, G3S496
ADMIN RECORD
ADMIN RECORD
AOMIN RECORD
ADMIN RECORD
VGA
HATER
FUEL
HATER
METALS
HATER
VOLATILES
DATA
000000000000000
0050
02/16/93
00166 MCB CAMP PENDIETON
02.2
MATRIX; HATER
l^^f: T-.
MOLYBDENUM SDO: 03564S.G35733.G35767.G35918.
HATER
METALS
CYANIDE
SOUTHWEST DIVISION
DATA
000000000000000
0029
02/16/93
00166 MCB CAMP PENDLBTON
02.2
MATRIX^ HATER ~~~~ :
PARAMETERS: TPH-GASOLIHE AND TPH-DIBSEL
SDO: OJ5623.G3S61S.G36420,03«SS03,036454,035812.
ADHIH RECORD
HATER
FUEL
SOUTHWEST DIVISION
M006B1 002438
DATA
000000000000000
0030
07/22/94 CHZM HILL
02/K/93
001«< MCB CAMP PENDLETON
02.2
PARAMETERS; GENERAL CHEMISTRY CASE- KACPHSE
SDG: G3S849.C358B1.036526.035950,035951,C3644S,C3S896
RECORD
HATER
SOUTHUEST DIVISION
-------
DATE - 08/24/98
.
CONTR/GUID..NO.. CTO.NO
APPAax.l.OF.PACES EPA.CAT*
SUBJECT .............
H00681 001255
DATA
001C
OS/J7/54
02/11/93
001(6
02.2
HANAOERS
IT CORPORATIOH
BVCOC. DATE)
... CLASSIFICATION KBrtJORDS
ADMIH RECORD JOG
PACE . 64
•Site...'....Location.
HOOfiii 00236
DATA
000000000000000
OD15
)7/21/94
02/25/93
00166
02.2
: HATER
' CHLORIIiATED HERBICIDES
MCB CAMP PEHDLETON
M006B1 000722
DATA
05/16/94
02/26/93
00166
;02.2
ilfSTOM MANAGERS
«CB CAMP PENDLETON
REPORT FOR HCB CAHP
05/14/94
02/26/93
0016*
02.2
HESTOH MANAGERS
MCB CAMP PENDLETON
LABORATORY REPORT FOR HCB CAMP
NOOS81 000724
DATA
05/16/M
02/2S/93
00166
02.2
MESTON MANAGERS
MCB CAMP PENDLETON
"»»io«< uuii »ui •„,
M00681 000721
DATA
05/1S/94
02/28/9J
00166
02.2
tESTOK
HCB CAHP PENDLETON
H00681
DATA
0496
M006il000726
DATA
0542
05/13/94
03/01/93
00166
02.2
OS/16/94
03/01/93
00166
02.2
"HESTOH MANAGERS
IT CORPORATION
MANAGERS"
MCB CAMP PENDLETON
SDG» W2666 RFN* 9302S098.9302S111
ADMIN RECORD VOC~
«ESTON MANAGERS
CAMP PENDLETON
MOOS81
DATA
0316
000128"
05/16/94
03/01/93
00166
02.2
HESTON MANAGERS
MCB CAMP PENDLBTON
LABORATORY P.LKIHT FOR MCB
««»««
FH« 9302S098.9302SUJ
WHIN RECORD IOG~
-------
DATE - 08/24/9J
UIC No. DOC.NO. PRC.DATE
DOCUMENT. TYPE... DOC.DATE
COOTH/CUID..SO.. CTO.NO..
APFROX.«. OF. PAGES ;EPA. CATS
FROM
FRON.S1CNATUHB.
TO.SIGNATURE!'. '.
PEBDLETON ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD FllE INDEX ISORTED BY DOC. DATE)
SUBJECT.... CLASSIFICATION KEYWORDS
PAGE . 65
• Site Location......
H006SI
DATA
0519
000729
002353
M00681
DATA
000000000000000
001S
05/14/94
03/01/93
00166
02.2
07/21/94
03/01/93
00166
02.2
HESTOH MANAGERS
MCB CAMP PENDLETON
CH2M HILL
MCB CAMP PENDLETON
LABORATORY RETORT FOR MCB CAMP PENDLTOM
CLP AND NOH-CLP\
SDG.
ADM1H RECORD SOLVENTS
PARAMETERS: CHLORINATED HERBICIDES
SOUTHWEST DIVISION
MOOCH 000621
DATA
0401
05/13/94
03/03/93
00166
02.2
WESTON MANAGERS
IT CORPORATION
LABORATORY REPORT FOR MCB CAMP PENDLETON
CtP AND NONOLPMNORGANICS ANALYSIS SDGB H260*
9302S112.9302S133
NBSTOM MANACeRS
LABORATORY REPORT FOR MCB CAMP PEJIDLBTON
SEMIVOLATILBS BY CC\HS LAB ID: 9J05S09H-001
IT CORPORATION
DAVE HARK
MOOCH 000550
DATA
OIF166S920066
0005
MOOjfl002305
DATA
ooooooooodooooo
0006
05/12/94
03/04/93
00166
02.2
07/20/94
03/04/93
00000
02.2
OlMNTALEX
MCB CA«P PENDLETON
BOY P. HESTOH
HCB CAMP PENDLETON
£?» *W'ID*TIO!' REPORT IKB CMP PEMOlETON G293B5~
MATRIX: SOIL PARAMETER: PCDDs AMD PCDF.
LAB: ROY F.
DATA
VOLATILES
H006B1 002306 07/20/94 ROY F. HESTON
DATA 03/04/93
000000000000000 00000 MCB CAMP PENDLETON
•OOOS 02.2
D006
MATRIX: SOIL
PARAMETERS: VOLATILES
SDO: H2700
ADMIN RECORD
VOLATILES
HOOm OOOS3B 05/12/94 QUANTALEX
DATA 03/05/93
01PISSS9200SS 00166 MCB CAMP PENDLETON
0020 02.2
-------
DATE - OI/24/S»
U1CKO. DOC.KO. PRC.DATB- FRON »" «HP PEHDLETOH ADHIHJSTmiVE RECORD FILE IHDEX (SORTED BY DOC. DATE)
DOCOXENT.TYPE... DOC.DATE PROH.sicHATORE!!
COKTR/CUID..HO.. CTO.NO.. TO CHILI.-*
APPROX.(.OF.PAGES EPA.CATI TO.SIGNATUKE '.'. SUBJECT CLASSIFICATION
PACE - 61
KEY HORDS
.Site...
. LOCK ion
H006SI 000539
DATA
01F16SS920065
0002
05/12/94 QUANTALEX
03/05/93
00186 HCB CAMP FENDLETON
02.2
MOOSS1 000540
DATA
01PUSS920066
OD32
H00681000541
DATA
01FIMS92006S
0011
05/12/94 QUANTALEX
03/05/93
0016S MCB CAMP PENDLETON
02.2
L.k*««u . ~"~~— "——• •"-" wvir r&jiufc&iuri 029380
MATRIX: HATER PARAMETER: CHLORINATED HERBICIDE
LAB: CH2M HILL SDGI 32946
DATA VALIDATION REPORT HCB CAHP PENDLBTON 029380
MATRIX: HATER PARAMETER: SEMIVOIAT1LE
LAB: CH2H HILL SDGK 335S9
ADHIN RECORD HATER
HERBICIDE
05/12/94 QUANTALEX
03/05/93
001« HCB CAHP PENDLETON
02.2
H00«»l 000542
DATA
01F1(«S9200C«
0016
MOOCtl000513
DATA
01PK6S9200fi£
0014
OS/12/94 QUAHTALEX
03/OS/93
0018S HCB CAHP PENDLETON
02.2
05/12/84 OUANTALEX
03/05/93
001S6 MCB CAHP FENDLETON
02.2
M006I1 00054
DATA
01F166S920066
ooia
H00681 000545
DATA
01P16SS920066
0015
H006B1 00054«
DATA
01F166S920066
0020
05/12/94 QUANTALEX
03/05/93
001«« MCB CAHP PENDLETON
02.2
05/12/94 OUANTALEX
03/05/93
OOISS HCB CAHP PENDLETON
02.2
05/12/J4 OUANTALEX
03/05/93
001«« HCB CAMP PENDLBTON
02.2
HOOCH
DATA
000547
0019
05/12/94 QUAHTALEX
03/OS/93
00166 HCB CAMP PENDLETON
02.2
HOOttl 000548
DATA
01F1CC5920066
0019
05/12/94 CUANTAliiT"
03/05/93
001S6 MCB CAMP PENDLETON
02.2
DATA VALIDATION REPORT HCB CAMP PENDLETON G293BO
HATRIX: HATER PARAMETER: PESTICIDESVPCB*
LAB: CH2H HILL SDG» 3367J
ADHIN RECORD
HATER
PESTICIDES
PCB
DATA VALIDATION REPORT HCB CAHP PENDLBTON 0293iO~
KATRIX: HATER PARAMETER: CHLORINATED HERBICIDES
IA8: CH2H HILL SDO« 33682
««» ?*TIOM BETORT "^ C*Mt> PENDLETON G29380
HATRIX: HATER PARAMETER: PESTICIDES\PCBa
LAB: CH2M HIIL SDOI 3371*
™t» G29380'
HATRIX: HATER PARAMETER: CHLORINATED HERBICIDES
MB: CH2H HILI. SDGI 3371B
M._,, ~------Jr REPORT HCB CAMP PENDLETON G293SO '
MATRIX: SOIL PARAMETER: PESTICIDESVPCB*
LAB: CH2M HILL SDG« 32452
DATA VALIDATION REPORT HCB CAMP PENDLETOH G29380"
MATRIX: HATER PARAMETER: PESTICIDES\PCB»
LAB: CH2M HILL SOCK 33719
1 CAHP PENDLETON C29360
HATER PARAMETER: PESTlCIDESVPCBa
LAB: CH3H HILL SDGII 33733
ADHIN RECORD
ADHIN RECORD
ADMIN RECORD
MATER
HERBICIDE
HATER
PESTICIDES
PCB
HATER '
HERBICIDES
ADHIN RECORD PESTICIDES
PCB
ADMIN RECORD
HATER
PESTICIDES
PCB
ADMIN RECORD
HATER
PESTICIDES
PCB
DATA VALIDATION REPORT MCB CAHP PEHDLETOH 029380
HATRIX: HAKH PARAMETER: PESTICIDES\PCB«i
-------
DOTE - 08/24/99
UIC No. DOC.SO
DOCtWENT.TYPE...
CONTR/GUID. .NO..
RECORD I
...SUBJECT
B« DOC. DATE)
••• CLASStFICAT10N
PACE . 67
MOOEI1 000549
DATA
01F166S120D66 ;
0014
MOOS81000(21
DATA
01F166S920066
OOli
M0068i 66o629'"
DATA
WF166S920066
0018
H00681OOOTJT
DATA
Oim«S920066
0019
OS/12/94
03/05/93
00166
02.2
05/u/sT
03/05/93
001CC
02.2
OS/13/94
03/05/93
00166
02.2
ls/13/9.,
03/OS/93
001C6
02.2
QUANTALEX
MCB CAMP PENDLETON
QUAHTALEJT
MCB CAMP PEHDLETOK
QUANTAIEX"
MCB CAMP PENDLETON
QUAHTALEX
MCB CAMP PEHDLETOH
DATA
01F166S920066
0013
000(32
M006SI
DATA
01FUSS920066
0013
FuW13/9« QUANTALET
03/OS/93
;001«6 MCB CAMP PENDLETON
"65/13/94"
03/05/93
00166 wo. CAMP PETOLETOH
000633
MOOE81
DATA
01F1«659200((
0013
03/05/93
00166 MCB CAMP PENDLBTON
000634
M006B1
DATA
01F166S920066
0013
M0068F
DATA
01F166S920066
0013
H006S1
DATA
01F166S920066
0012
05/1379T~OUANTALix
03/05/93
00166
02.2
MCB CAMP PENDLETOM
•slt« Location
RECORD HATER
HERBICIDE
WMIN RECORD
ADMIM RECORD
RECORD"
RECORD
AOMIN RECORD
PESTICIDES
PCB
HATER"
PESTICIDES
PCB
"i)ATER
PESTICIDES
PCB
warn"
TPH
HATER
TPH
RECORD"WATER"
TPH
OS/13/94
03/OS/93
00166
02.2
CAMP PENDLETON
DATA VALIDATION
MATRIX: HATER
"B= CH2M HILL SDC8 33820
TPH
SDO» 3OM
TPH
-------
DATE - 01/24/9*
UIC Ko. DOC.HO. PRC.DATE FROM "^ *" PEMOLEIOH «««NISTRATIVE RECORD FILE INDEX (SORTED BY DOC. DATE.
DOCVHEHT.TYPB... DOC.OATE FROM.SIGNATURE..
CONTR/GUID. .MO.. CTO.HO.. TO .
APPROX.I.OP.PAGES EPA.CATI TO.SICNATORE.'!'!
SUBJECT
SUBJECT
CLASSIFICATION KEY WORDS
PACE . (|
•Site Location
HOOtll 000637
DATA
01FH6S9J0066
0013
05/13/94 O.UAHTALEX
03/05/93
001«« HCB CAMP PENDLETOH
02.2
DATA VALIDATION REPORT FOR MCB CAMP PEHDLETON
MATRIX: HATER PARAMETER: TPH DIESEL
LAB: CH2H HILL SDOK 34296
M00611002345
DATA
000000000000000
0025
07/21/94 ESE
03/05/93
OOISS HCB CAMP PEKDLETOH
02.2
MATRIX: HATER
PARAMETERS: VOIATIIES
SDG: G35793 AND G36496
CASE NUMBER: NACPH6D
ADHIH RECORD
ADHIH RECORD
DATA 03/05/93
000000000000000 0016S MCB CAMP PENDLETON
0016 02.Z
M00681 002398 07/22/94 ESE
DATA 03/05/93
OOOOOOODOOOOOOO 0016S MCB CAHP PENDLETON
0045 ' 02.2
MOD6I100244007/22/94BSB
DATA 03/05/9}
000000000000000 00166 MCS CAMP PENDLETON
0020 02.2
DATA
0450
001258 05/27/94 HESTON MMUOERS
03/06/93
001«6 IT, CORPORATIOM
02.2
M006S1 000325
DATA
01FHSS920066
0013
05/11/94 OUAHTALEX
03/08/93
001« MCB CAMP PENDLETOH
02.2.
M0068100032605/11/94QUANTALEX
OATA 03/08/93
01F1S6S920066 OflKS MCB CAHP PENDLETON
0014 02.2
M00691 000321 05/11/94 QUANTALEX ~~
. DATA 03/08/93
01F166S920066 00166 HCB CAHP PENDLETON
0027 02.2
HOOS81 000328 05/11/94 QUANTALEX
DATA 03/08/93
OIF166S920066 00166 MCB CAHP PENDLETON
0024 02.2
MATRIX: HATER ' " "
PARAMETERS: TPH-GASOLINE AND TPH-DIESEL
SDG: C3S812 AND G36494
MATRIX: HATER
CASE: NACPH6D
PARAMETERS, TCL METALS WITH BORON. CYANIDE. HOLVBDENUN
SDC: 0362Sa.036110.036361(G36331.G362«.G36245.G36224
ADMIN RECORD
MATRIX: HATER
PARAMETERS: GENERAL CHEMISTRY CASE: NACPH6D
SDG: G3SB81.03SS26.G36442.G36234.036446,035961.G36031
LABORATORY REPORT FOR MCB CAMP PENDLETOH
SOIL RFHK 9303S245
DATA VALIDATION REPORT FOR HCB CAMP PENDLETON
MATRIX: HATER PARAMETER: TPH DIESEL LAB: CH2H HILL
SDGfl 33806
DATA VALIDATION REPORT FOR HCB CAHP PENDLETON
HATRK: HATER PARAMETER: TPH GASOLINE LAB: CH2H HILL
SDGtt 33006
ADMIN RECORD
ADMIN RECORD
ADMIN RECORD
ADMIN RECORD
DATA VALIDATION REPORT FOR HCB CAMP PENDLETON
MATRIX: HATER PARAMETER: SEMIVOLATILES LAB: CH2M HILL
SDGV 34325
ADHIH RECORD
DATA VALIDATION REPORT FOR MCB CAMP PENDLETON '
MATRIX: HATER PARAMETER: SEMIVOLATILES LAB: CH2M HILL
ADMIN RECORD
HATER
TPH
HATER
VOLATILES
HATER
FUEL
HATER
KETALS
CYANIDE
HATER
DATA
HATER
TPH
HATER
TPH
HATER
SOLVENTS
HATER
SOLVENTS
SOUTHWEST DIVISION
-------
DATE - 08/24/98
UIC No. DOC.NO.
DOCUMENT. TYPE. ..
CONTR/GUID..NO..
APPROX.H.OF. PAGES EPA.CATH
PRC.DATE FROM
DOC. DATE FROM. SIGNATURE.......
TO
TO. SIGNATURE
HCB CAMP PENDLETON ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD FILE INDEX (SORTED BY
CTO.NO..
SUBJECT.
H00681 000129
DATA
01F166S920066
002?
05/11/94
03/08/93
00166
02.2
QUANTALEX
MCB CAMP PENDLBTON
M006§1000330 05/11/94 QUANTALEX
DATA Ol/OS/9)
OIF166S9200SS 001«« HCB CAMP PENDLETON
0028 02.2
H006I1000331OS/11/94QUANTALEX"
DMA 03/08/93
01F166S92006S 00366 MCB CAMP PENDLETOH
0019 02.2
M006JJ000332 05/11/M QUANTAIEX
DATA 103/08/93
01F166S92dO«6 OOlfS MCB CAMP PENDLETON
0020 :02.2
"0068100033305/11/94 QUANTALEX
DATA 03/08/93
01FU6S92006S 001«6 MCB CAMP PENDLETON
0021 02.2
M006B100033405/11/94 QUANTALEX
DATA
01P166S92006S
0023
03/08/93
001«« MCB CAMP PENDLETON
02.2
M00681
DATA
01F166S92D066
0025
00033S 05/11/94 QUANTALEX
03/08/93
00166
02.2
MCB CAMP PENDLETON
M006J1 000496 05/12/94 QUANTALEX
DATA 03/OS/93
01F1G6S920066 001S6 MCB CAMP PENDLEKW
0012 02.2
DATA VALIDATION REPORT FOR MCB CAMP PENDLETCW
MATRIX: HATER PARAMETER: SEMIVOLATILES LAS' CH2M HILL
SDGp 3431* . i
H006SI000497OS/12/94QUANTALEX
PATA 03/08/93
01F166S9200S« 00166 KCB CAMP PENDLETOH
0013 02.2
000498
K00631
DATA
01FU6S92004S
0013
05/12/94 QUAOTALEX
03/09/93
00166 MCB CAMP PENDLETON
02.2
DATA VALIDATION REPORT FOR MC8 CAHP PENDLBTOH
MATRIX: HATER PARAMETER: SEMIVOLATILES LAB: CH2M HILL
SDGil 34402
DOC. DATE>
CLASSIFICATION
«•"•»* »•••••»•••••,
ADMIK RECORD
ADMIN RECORD
DATA VALIDATION REPORT FOR MCB CAMP PEHDLBTOH
MATRIX: HATER PARAMETER: VOLATILE LAB: CH2M BILL
SDGB 33806
DATA VALIDATION REPORT FOR «CB CAMP fENOLETON
MATRIX: HATER PARAMETER: VOLATILES LAB: CH2H HILL
SDG0 34364
DATA VALIDATION REPORT FOR MCB CA«P PENDLETON
MATRIX: WATER PARAMETER: VOLATILES LAB: CH2H HILL
SDC9 34314
DATA VALIDATION REPORT FOR MCB CAMP PENDLETOH
MATRIX: HATER PARAMETER: VOLATILES LAB: CH2M HILL
SDG« 34402
DATA VALIDATION REPORT FOR HCB CAMP PENDLETON
MATRIX: HATER PARAMETER: VOLATILES LAB: CH2H HILL
DATA VALIDATION REPORT MCB CAMP PENDLETON
MATRIX: HATER PARAMETER: TPH GASOLINE
LAB: CH2M HILL SDGB 33733
DATA VALIDATION REPORT HCB CAMP PENDLETOK
MATRIX: WATER PARAMETER: TPH DIESEL
LAB: CH2M HILL SDG« 33733
DATA VALIDATION REPORT HCB CAMP PEHDLETOH'
MATRIX: HATER PARAMETER, TPH GASOLINE
LAB: CH2M KILL SDCB 33673
ADMIN RECORD
ADHIN RECORD
ADMIN RECORD
ADMIN RECORD
ADMIN RECORD
ADMIN RECORD
KEY HORDS
HATER
SOLVENTS
HATER
SOLVENTS
PACE
...Site. Location
HATER
VOC
HATER
HATER
HATER
TPH
HATER
TPH
HATER
TPH
-------
DATE - 08/24/98
CMP
UICBO. DOC.«0. PRC.DATB FROM..
DOCWffiHT.TYPE... DOC.DATS FROM. SIGNATURE ......
COHTR/GU10..NO.. crO.IW.. TO
APPROX.H.OF.PAGES EPA.CAT* TO.SICNATURE ...... ..
ADHIHISTRAT1VE RECORD FILE IKDEX (SORTED By DOC. DATEI
CLASSIFICATION KEYWORDS
PAGE . 70
.site Location
M006B1 000499 OS/12/94 QUAHTALEX
DATA 03/08/93
01Fl£6S92006fi 00166 1KB CAHP PENDLETOH
001J 02.2
DATA VALIDATION REPORT KB CAHP PENDLETON
MATRIX! HATER PARAMETER: TPH DIESEL
LAB: CH2M KILL SDG» 33673
M00681 OQOSOO
DATA
01F166S920066
0024
OS/12/94 QUAJttALEX
03/08/93
101(6 HCB CAHP PENDLETON
02.2
DATA VALIDATION REPORT MCB CAHP PSHDLETOH
MATRIX: SOIL- PARAMETER: SEHIVOLATIES
LAB: CH2H HILL SDG» 32452
H00681
DATA
OIF166S920066
0018
OOOS01 OS/12/94 QUANTALEX
03/08/93
00166
02.2
HCB CAMP PENDLETON
DATA VALIDATION REPORT HCB CAHP PENDLETOH
MATRIX: SOIL PARAMETER; VOLATIES
LAB: CH2H HILL SDGH 32452
M006B1 000502
DATA
01F166S920066
0014
OS/12/34 QUANTALeX
03/01/93
00166 HCB CAHP PENDLETON
02.2
DATA VALIDATION DEPORT HCB CAMP PENDLETON
MATRIX: SOIL t WATER PARAMETER: TPH DIESEL
LAB: CHJH HILL SDG« 32948
M00681 OOOS03
DATA
OIF165S920066
0031
05/12/94 QUANTALEX
03/08/93
00l«6 MCB CAMP PENDLETON
02.2
DATA VALIDATION REPORT MCB CAMP PENDLETON
MATRIX: SOIL t HATER PARAMETER: TPH OASOL1HE
LAB: CH2M HILL SDOB 3294S
M0058100050405/12/94QUANTALEX
DATA 03/09/93
01F166S920066 00166 MCB CAMP PENDLETON
0013 02.2
DATA VALIDATION REPORT MCB CAMP PENDLETOB
MATRIX: WMER PARAMETER: TPH DIESEL
LAB: CH2H HILL SDG» 33719
H006»lOOOS0505/12/94QUANTALEX~~
DATA 03/08/93
01F166S920066 00166 HCB CAMP PENDLETON
0013 02.2
HO 0681 000506 OS/12/94 QUANTALEX
DATA 03/01/93
01F1S6S920066 00166 MCB CAMP PENDLETON
0020 02.2
DATA VALIDATION REPORT HCB CAHP PENDLETOH
MATRIX: HATER PARAMETER: TPH CASOUHE
LAB: CH2H HILL SDGS 33718
DATA VALIDATION REPORT MCB CAMP PESDLETOH
MATRIX: HATER PARAMETER: VOLATILES
tAB: CHSM HILL SDG» 33696
ADHIH RECORD HATER
TPH
ADHIH RECORD SOLVENTS
ADHIH RECORD VOC
ADHIN RECORD HATER
TPH
ADMIN RECORD
ADMIN RECORD
HATER
TPH
NATER
TPH
ADHIH RECORD HATER
TPH
ADMIN RECORD MATER
VOC
M00681 OOOS07
DATA
Om««S920066
0013
DATA
01F166S920066
0013
OS/12/94 QUANTALEX
03/08/93
001SS MCB CAMP PENDLETON
02.2
03/08/93
001S6 MCB CAMP PEHDLETON
02.2
DATA VALIDATION REPORT MCB CAMP PENDLETON
MATRIX: WATER PARAMETER: TPH DIESEL
LAB: CH2H HILL SDGK 33683
DATA VALIDATION REPORT MCB CAMP PEMDLETOH
MATRIX: HATER PARAMETER: TPH GASOLINE
LAB: CH2M HILL SDGI 33683
ADHIN RECORD HATER '
TPH
ADMIN RECORD HATER ~
TPH
-------
DATE -06/24/911 '
"1C Ho. DQC.NO. 1 PRC.DATE FROM ...... "" C*"F
^^^,'^PL- ' I DOC-DATE "IOH.SWNAT^E: .' .' .' .' '
CONTR/GUID. .NO. . ' CTO.NO. . TO
APPROX.*. OP. PACES EPA.CATH TO.sicNATURE ........
•••••••••••••_.___. _________ ..... -•
«*IN1STRATIVB RECORD FILE ,TOEX (SORTED
M006S1 000509
DATA
01F166S920066
0033
000510"
DATA
01FH6S920066
0047
M00681 0005 IT
DATA
01F16«S9200S6
0031
05/12/94
03/01/93
• 00166
'02.2
03/08/93
,00166
;02.3
705/12/94
03/08/93
00166
02.2
QOANTALEX
MCB CAMP PENDLETON
QUANTALEX
«CB CAHP PEHDLETOH
QUANTALEX
MCB CAMP PENDLETOH
DATA VALIDATION REPORT MCB CAMP PEHDLFTnH
HAmX: HATER PARAMETER: VOLATILE
; LAB, CH2M HILL SDG» 32520
BY DOC. DATE)
• - - . C1ASSIFICAT10N KEY HORDS
"*"*"*"**••"•••••'•«-—»-•.••••,
ADMIN RECORD HATER
PAGE - 71
• Site Location
CAHP
X: SOIL PARAMETER: SEMIVOLATILES
LAB: CH2M HILL SDG» 32520
VALIDATION REPORT MCH CAMP PENDLETON '
MATRIX: SOIL PARAMETER, SEMIVOLATILES
US' CH2M HItL SDC« 33042 W""1LES
ADMIN RECORD^ SOLVENTS"
RECORD SOLVENTS"
M00681 002444
DATA
000000000000000
0019
MOOS 91 000512
DATA
01F166S9200S6
0053
05/12/94
03/08/93
00166
02.2
QUAWTALEX
MCB CAMP PBMDL6TOM
DATA VALIDATIOH REPORT MCB CAMP
H00?«l 000324
DATA
ESE
JEFF THOMAS
IT CORPORATION
DAVID KMK
03/10/93
001«<
03.3
HOOCil 001232
DATA
05/27/94
03/10/93
00166
02.2
HESTON MANAGERS
IT CORPORATION
SDGO N2684 RFHfl 9302S112
HOOSB1 002390
DATA
000000000000000
0020
07/21/94
03/10/93
00166
02.2
CH2M HILL
MCB CArtp PENDLBTO»
MATRIX: WATER
PARAMETERS: PESTIC1DES/PCB«
SDO: °36S1» CASE: NACPH6D
M00681 002391
DATA
000000000000000
0023
07/22/94
OJ/10/93
00166
02.2
BSE
MCB CAMP PENOLETOM
MATRIX: WATER
PARAMETERS: PESTICIDES/PCB*
SDG: 03S5I9 „„, NA
NOOC81 002443
s
MCB CAMP PENDLETOH
ooooooooooaoooo
SOUTHWEST DIVISIOW
07/22/94
03/10/93
00166
02.2
ESE
HCB CAMP PENDLETOK
i CMU*1*W> HERBICIDES CASE: NACPHSE
SOUTHWEST DIVISION
-------
DATS - 01/24/SI
UJC No. DOC.KO.
DOCUHEHT.TYPE... .
CONTR/CUID. .NO.. CTO.NO..
APPROX.a.QF.PAGES EPA.CATS
PflC.DATE FROM
DOC.DATE FROM-SIGNATURs!."
«»""STRATIVE RECORD P|U IKDEX (SORTED B* DOC DATE,
PACE . 12
M006II 002330
DATA
000000000000000
0022
07/21/J4
03/11/93
00166
02.2
CH2H HILL
PEGGY A. NORTON
IT CORPORATION
DAVE MARK
SUBJECT
CLASSIFICATION KEYWORDS
• ;
ANALYTICAL DATA FOR CTO ,166. LRD LAB REFERENCE NO. ADMIN RECORD MTA
LAB
• Site., Location
MOOfll 00233C
DATA
ooooooooooooooo
0020
07/21/9*
03/11/93
00166
02.2
HATER
SEWVOLATILES
M0069T 000336
DATA
01F166S920D6S
0027
05/11/94
03/12/93
00166
02.2
QUANTALEX
HCB CAMP
DATA VALIDATION REPORT TOR HCB CAMP
. i!SaSSS ««
™*™*1*' ««
H00681
DATA
01FU6S920066
0002
OS/11/94
03/12/93
00166
02.2
QUANTALEK
«CS CAMP PENDLETON
ADMIN RECORD WATER
ADMIN RECORDTPH
H00681 000339
DATA
01F16SS920066
0013
H00681 000340
DATA
01F166S920066
0016
03/12/S3
00166
02.2
ls/U/S4
03/12/93
00166
02.2
QUANTALEX
MCB CAMP PENDLETON
OUANTALEX
MCB CAMP PENDLETON
Ty
MATRIX: SOIL PARAMETER: TPH DIESEL
LAB: CH2N HILL SDQK 32520
POR
ADMIN RECORDHATER
HERBICIDE
M00681 000"i«
DATA
01FI66S920065
0053
OS/11/34
03/12/93
00166
02.2
QUAHTALEX
MCB CAMP PENDLETON
QUANTALEK
HCB CAMP PENDLETON
FOR MCB
: CHLORINATED
HILL SDG* 33611
OS/11/94
03/12/93
00166
02.2
WANTALEX
MCB CAMP PENDLETON
-------
DATE - 08/24/98 .
UIC NO. OOC.NO. 'PRC.DATE FROM.
;;-' - .CNATURE..
CONTR/GUID.. HO.. ;CTO. NO. TO
APPROX.D.OF. PAGES IEPA.CMB TO/SIGNATURE; '.'.'.'.'.'.'.
CAMP PENDLETOH ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD FILE INDEX (SORTED
SUBJECT
H00681 000341
DATA
01FKSS9200S6
001]
OS/11/91
03/12/93
00160
02.2
MOOKI1 00034S
DATA
01F166S920066
0014
05/11/94
03/12/93
00166
02.2
ADMIN RECORD HERBICIDES
M00681OOwiT
DATA
01P166S920066
0014
M006S1000347
DATA
01F166S92006C
0026
M00««l 000341
DATA
01F166S930066
0012
M00681
DATA
01F166S920066
0014
M006B1 000)50
DATA
OIF16SS920066
ooia
000351
DATA
01FH6S9J0066
0013
05/11/94
03/12/93
00166
02.2
'OS/u/94
O.J/12/9J
00166
02.2
05/U/94
03/12/93
00166
02.2
05/11/94
03/12/93
00166
02.2
05/11/94
03/12/93
00166
02.2
OUANTALEX
MCB CAMP PENDLETOM
QUANTALEX
MCB CAMP PENDLETOM
QUANTALEX
CAMP PEBDLETON
QUANTALEX"
MCB CAMP PENDLETON
WANTALEX
CAMP PENDLETOM
»ix«« POR ** MP
MATRIX: SOIL PARAMETER: TPH GASOLINE
LAB: CH2M HILL SDC8 32520
DOC. DATE>
. CLASSIFICATION KEV MORBS
.......... ...... ................
ADMIH RECORD TPH
PACE - 7}
•.-Site..
.Location
»MTRIX-~MnrMD»»'' F°" "^ CAW PENDLBTON
MATRIX: HATER PARAMETER: TPH DIESEL
LAB: CH2M HILL SW3» 33740
t REPORT FOR MCB CAMP PEMDLETOM
MATRIX: HATER PARAMETER, TPH GASOLINE
LAB: CH2M HJlt SDOd 33140
ADMIN RECORD
ADMIN RECORD
HATER
TPH
HATER
TPH
MCB CAMP PENDLETON
QUANTALEX
HCB CAMP PBNDLETON
ADMIN RECORD HATER
HERBICIDES
FOB "" CAMP
ADMIH RECORD
HATER
HERBICIDES
000352
DATA
01F166S920066
0015
H00681000353"
DATA
01F166S920066
0015
OS/11/94
03/12/93
00166
03,. 2
05/11/94
03/12/93
00166
02.2
"o5/ll/94~
03/12/93
00166
02.2
QUANTALBX
MCB CAMP PENDLETOH
OUANTALEX
MCB CAMP PENDLETON
^QUAHTALEX
MCB CAMP PENDLETON
VALIOAT10H REPORT FOR
MATRIX: HATER PARAMETER: T
LAB: CH2M HILL SDC» 33119
DATA VALIDATION REPORT FOR HCB CAMP
ADMIN RECORD
HATER
HERBICIDES
-------
DATE . OI/24/JI
WC Ho. DOC.HO. PRC.DATE
DOCOHEHT.TYPE... DOC.DATE moH sic
COHTR/COJD..HO:. CToiNo!: TO
APPROX.I.OP.PACES EPA.CATI
F«OH
HCB CAMP PENDLETOM ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD FILE ,NOEX .SORTED BV DOC. DATE,
™*::::::" SUW£CT CLASSIFICATION
PACE . 74
H006I1 000354
DATA
OIF166S920066
0015
OS/11/51
03/12/93
001S6
02. a
S£te Location
OUANTALEX
MCB CAMP PENDLETON
DATA VALIDATION REPORT FOR MCB CAMP
""
MOOfili00035S
DATA
01FU6S9200S6
OOIC
Soolfi ooolsT
DATA
01F1C6S92Q066
0013
H006810003S7~
DATA
01F166S920Q66
0019
M006B1 ', 000358
DATA
01F166S920066
0019
H00681000359
DATA
01F166S920066
0013
05/11/94
03/12/93
00166
02.2
05/11/94
03/32/93
00166
02.3
03/12/93
00166
02.2
05/11/94
03/12/93
00166
02.2
05/11/94
03/12/93
00166
02.2
QUANTALEX
MCB CAMP PENDLETON
OUANTALEX
HCB CAMP PENDLETON
OUANTALEX
HCB CAMP PENDLETON
QOANTAU3C
HCB CAMP PENDLETON
WATER
HERBICIDES
LAB? C^iTSSt'sSSSiT"™"1 CHWR1H*TED ««"MM«
MCB CAMP PENDLETOH
*m«« AH
: SOIL PARAMETER: TPH DIESEL
: CH2H HILL SDG» 32452
ADMIN RECORD
TPH
M006B1 000360
DATA
01F166S920066
0012
MOOm 000361
DATA
01F166S920066
0016
H00681000362
DATA
01F166S920066
0018
M006D1000431
DATA
01F166S920066
0021
05/11/94
03/12/93
00166
02.2
05/11/94
03/12/93
00166
02.2
OS/U/94
01/12/93
001<«
02.2
OUANTALEX ~
MCB CAMP PENDLETON
QOAMTALEX
CAMP PENDLETON
QUAHTALEX
MCB CAMP PENDLETON
VALIDATHm HEPORT FOR MCB CAMP
03/12/93
00166
02.2
CAMP PENDLETON
DATA VALIDATION
HATRIX: «ATER P
LAB: CH2HH1LL SKI 34325
ADMIN RECORD
HATER
VOC
-------
DATE - 01/24/98
UIC Mo. DOC.NO. PRC.DATE
DOCOHW.TYPE... DOC.DATE
CONTR/GUID..NO. . CTO NO '
APPROX.».OF.PACES EPA!CAT*
M00681 000432
DATA ,
01F166SJ20066
0017
.
FROM. SIGNATURE
TO
TO.SIGNATURE.'..'.'.'.'.'.'
RECORD FILE INDEX (SORTED
SMJECT. . . .
DOC. DATE)
• ClASSiriCATIOH KEYWORDS
ADMIN RECORD HATER
VOC
PAGE . 75
\
•Sice Location
000434
H00681
DATA
01F166S920066
0033
MOfllir
DATA
D1F1SSS9200SS
002S
00043C
HOOS81
DATA
01H66S920066
0020
000437
HOOS81
DATA
01F1S6S920066
0023
K00681 OOOilT
DATA
OIH66S9200S6
0016
motii 000439"
DATA
01P1SSS920066
0013
05/12/94
03/12/93
'ooice
,02.2
OS/12/9*
03/12/93
001S6
02.2
05/12/94
03/12/93
00166
02.2
OS/12/94"
03/12/93
00166
02.2
;OS/12/9«
^03/12/93
OUANTA1EX
CAMP PENDLETfflf
ACMJN RECORD HATER
VOC
MCB CAMP PENDLETON
M00681
DATA
01F166SW0066
0029
000440
000441
DATA
01F166S920066
0022
02.2
05/12/94"
03/12/93
00166
02.2
~ 05/12/94
03/12/93
00166
02.2
"oS/12/94
03/12/93
0016s
02.2
'OUAHTALEX"
HCB CAMP PEMOLBTOH
QUANTALEX-
MCB CAMP PENDLETON
QWANTALEX
MCB CAMP PENDLBTOH
MCB CAHP PENDLETON
QUANTALEX
MCB CAMP PENDLETON
VOC
AOHIN RECORDWATER"
voc
RECORD
ADMIN RECORD
VOC
HERBICrDE
ADMIN RECORD 5ATET
ADMIM RECORD
QUANTALEX"
MCB CAMP PENDLBTON
SDG, 34545
ADMIN RECORD WATER~
SOLVENTS
-------
DATE • 01/24/M
UIC No. DCC.Nfl
DOCUMEHT.TYPE. .
CONTR/GUID..HO.
APPROX.I.OF.PAG
H006BI 000442
DATA
OJF166S920066
0027
DATA
01F1SCS920066
0024
H006B1 000444
DATA
01F166S92Q066
0060
M006B1 00044S
DATA
01F16SS920066
0032
DATA
01F166S920066
0029
H006S1 000447
DATA
01F1«S9200«6
0025
H00681 000323
DATA
0436
M00681 002334
DATA
000000000000000
002S
H006B1 002434
DATA
0030
DATA
3S104
l«37
>. MC.MT8 FROH "* C"* *™°™™ W»IHISTRATIVE RECORD FILE INDEX I50KRO 1
. DOC.DATE FROH. SIGNATURE
. CTO.KO.. TO
ES EPA.CATI TO, SIGNATURE
05/12/94 gUAHTALEX
03/12/93
00166 MCB CAMP PENDLETON
02.2
03/12/93
00166 MCB CAHP PENDLETON
02.2
05/12/94 QUAHTALEX
03/12/93
00166 MCB CAMP PENDLETON
02.2
03/12/93
00166 HCB CAMP PENDLETON
02.2
05/12/94 QUANTALEX
03/12/93
00166 MCB CAMP PENDLETON
02.2
03/12/93
001SS MCB CAMP PENDLETON
02.2
05/11/94 WESTION MANAGERS
03/15/S3 ROY F. WESTON
00166 IT CORPORATION
:02.2
07/21/44 ru?u UTtt ~"
03/17/93
00166 MCB CAMP PENDLETON
02.2
07/22/94 CH2M HILL ~~"
03/17/93
166 MCB CAMP PENDLETON
02.2
05/11/94 CH2M KILL
03/11/93 PEGGY A. NORTON
00166 MCB CAMP PENDLKTOH
02.2
SUBJECT
LAB: CH2MH1LL SDG» 34237 '"'•""•ES
DATA VALIDATION REPORT FOR MCB CAMP PENDLETON
MATRIX: WATER PARAMETER, SEMIVOLATILES
LAB: CH2MHILL SDGI 34376
?*!* VALIDATION REPORT FOR HCB CAHP PENDLETON
MATRIX: WATER PARAMETER: SEHIVOLAT1LES
US: CH2MHIU, SDGI 34376
DATA VALIDATION REPORT MCB CAMP PENDLETON
MATRIX: WATER PARAMETER: SEH1VOLATILES
LAB: CH2M HILL SDGH 34414
DATA VALIDATION REPORT HCB CAMP PENDLETON
MATRIX: HATER PARAMETER: SEMIVOLATILES
LAB: CH2H HILL SDGB 34429
DATA VALIDATION REPORT MCB CAMP PENDLETON ~~
MATRIX: WATER PARAMETER: SEMIVOLATILES
UB: CH2M HILL SDGI 34583
LABORATORY REPORT FOR IT CORP. HCB CAMP PENDLETON
CLP/CC/HS VOLATILE ANALYSIS SDGI W2700
RFHI 93024S205, 9302S2IS, 9303S237, 9303S245
MATRIX: HATER —
PARAMETERS: SEMIVOLATILES
SDG: 35377
MATRIX: WATER
PARAMETERS: TO. METALS WITH BORON. CYANIDE AND
MOLYBDENUM SDG: 35377
AWUiiTlUui "ATA BIO ACClRfULATION. PESTICIDESVPCBs
ORCNA I CS , T MORGAN I CS
SDC» 35104
BY DOC. DATE) pAGE . 76
. - - CLASSIFICATION KEY WORDS . . .SIte „,„, ,„„
AEMIN RECORD WATER
ADMIN RECORD SOLVENTS
ADH1N RECORD WATER ~
SOLVENTS
ADMIN RECORD WATER .
ADMIN RECORD WATER — .
SOLVENTS
' !•
ADMIN RECORD WATER ' ~
SOLVENTS
ADMIN RECORD WATER •
SOLVENTS
ADMIN RECORD VOC
ADMIN RECORD HATER •
SEMIVOLATILES
ADMIN RECORD WATER ~ —
METALS
CYANIDE
PCB
100
-------
DATE - 08/24/98
UIC No. iDOC.NO.
DOCUMENT.TYPE...
CONTR/CUID..NO..
PRC.DATE
DOC.DATE
CTO.NO..
APPHOX.fr OF.PAGES EPA.CATB
FROM
FROM. SIGNATURE ......
"'
PENDLETON ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD FILE INDEX (SORTED BY DOC. DATEI
-.--...SUBJECT
CLASSIFICATION
PAGE
KEY WORDS
.Site Location.
H00681 000115 05/11/94 QUANTALEX
DATA 03/19/9J
01F166S920066 00166 MCB CAMP PBNDLETON
0011 02.2
HOOJSI 000320 05/11/94 HESTIOH MANAGERS
0*TA 03/19/93 ROY P. HBSTON
00166 IT CORPORATION
0083 02.2
DATA VALIDATION REPORT FOR MCB CAMP PENDLETON
MATRIX: HATER PARAMETER: PESTICIDES\PCBa
LAB: CH2M HILL SDGR 34365
LABORATORY REPORT FOR IT CORP. VOLATILE PURGEABLE"
PETROLEUM HYDROCARBOMS ANALYSIS SDOK H2700
RFH8 93025205. 9303S245
ADHIH RECORD
ADMIN RECORD
HATER
PESTICIDES
PCS
TPH
000387
H006S1
DATA
01F166S920066
0012
05/11/94 QUANTALEX
03/19/93
00166 MCB CAMP PENDLETON
02.2
MOOSW 000388OS/11/94QUANTALEX
DATA 03/19/93
01FI66S920066 00166 MCB CAMP PENDLETON
0018 02.2
DATA VALIDATION REPORT FOR MCB CAMP PENDLETON
MATRIX: WATER PARAMETER; TPH DIESEL
LAB: CH2M KILL SDG» 31624
DATA VALIDATION REPORT FOR MCB CAMP PENDLETON
MATRIX: HATER PARAMETER! PESTICIDES\PCB»
LAB: CH2M HILL SDGD 33642
M008I1 000389
DATA
01F166S520066
0020
05/11/94 QUAHTALEX
03/19/93
00166 MCB CAMP PEHDLETOW
02.2
H00681 000390
DATA
01F166S9200C6
0011
05/11/94 QUANTALEX
03/19/93
0016S MCB CAMP PENDLETON
02.2
M006B1 000391 05/11/94 QUANTALEX'
DATA 03/19/91
01F1S6S920066 0016S MCB CAMP PENDLETON
0020 l 02.2
H00681 000392
DATA
01F166S920066
0012
OS/11/94 QUANTALEX
03/19/93
001«6 MCB CAMP PENDLETON
02.2
M006B1 000393
DATA
01F166S920066
0012
05/11/94 QUANTALEX
03/19/93
0016G MCB CAMP PENDLETON
02.2
H00681 000391
DATA !
01F16SS9200S6
0017
05/11/94
03/19/93
00166
02.2
OUAHTALEX
MCB CAMP PENDLETON
DATA VALIDATION REPORT FOR MCB CAMP PENDLETON"
MATRIX: HATER PARAMETER: PESTICIDES\PCB«
LAB: CH2H HILL SDGf 34689
DATA VALIDATION REPORT FOR MCB CAMP PENDLETON
MATRIX: SEDIMENT PARAMETER: CHLORINATED HERBICIDE
LAB: CH2M HILL SDOd 32452
DATA VALIDATION REPORT FOR HCB CAMP PENDLETON"
MATRIX: HATER PARAMETER: VOLATILES
LAS: CH2M HILL SDGI 34688
ADMIN RECORD HATER
TPH
ADMIN RECORD HATER
PESTICIDES
PCS
ADHIH RECORD HATER
PESTICIDES
PCS
ADMIN RECORD HERBICIDE'
ADMIN RECORD HATER
VOC
MATRIX! HATER PARAMETER: TPH DIESEL
LAB: CH2M HILL SDGH 34668
ADMIN RECORD HATER
TPH
DATA VALIDATION REPORT FOR MCB CAMP PENDLETON
MATRIX: HATER PARAMETER: TPH GASOLINE
LAB: CH2M HILL SDGS 34688
ADMIN RECORD HATER
TPH
DATA VALIDATION REPORT FOR MCB CAMP P6NDLETON "
MATRIX: HATER PARAMETER: CHLORINATED HERBICIDE
LAB: CH2M HILL SDG* 34688
AOMIN RECORD HATER
HERBICIDE
-------
DATE - 01/24/M
OIC NO. DOC.HO. PRC.DATE FROH !!ff.?** fEMlE™ *»»««»»«« RECORD FILE INDEX (SORTED BY DOC. DATE)
DOCUHENT.TYPE... DOC.DATE FROM.SIGNATURE
CONTR/GUID. .HO.. CIO.HO.. TO
APPROX.I.OF.PAGES EPA.CAT* TO.SIGNATURE...'.
SUBJECT.
CLASSIFICATION KEl HORDS
PACE - 78
Location...
HOOCH 000395
DATA
01FI66S920066
0024
OS/11/94 QUANTALEX
03/19/93
00156 HCB CAMP PENDLETOH
02.3
DATA VALIDATION REPORT FOR HCB CAMP PENDLETOH
MATRIX! HATER PARAMETER: SEHIVOLATILES
LAB: CH2M HILL. SOCK 34688
DATA 03/19/93
Om«6S920066 00166 HCB CAMP PENDLETON
0019 02.2
N00681 000397 OS/11/94 QUANTALEX
DATA 03/19/93
01P166S920066 00166 MCB CAMP PENDLETOH
0012 01.1
M00691 000398
DATA
01F166S920066
0012
OS/11/S4 QUANTALEX
03/19/93
00166 HCB CAMP PEHDLETON
02.2
H006II000399OS/11/94QUAHTALEX
DATA 03/19/93
01F166S920066 00166 NCB CAMP PENDLETOH
0030 ' 02.2
H00681 000400
DATA
01F166S920066
0022
H006I1000401
DATA
01F166S920066
0019
05/11/94QUANTALEX'
03/19/93
00166 HCB CAMP PEHDLETOH
02.2
05/11/94 QUANTALEX " ~
03/19/93
00166 HCB CAMP PENDLETON
02.2
M00681000402 05/11/94 QUANTALEX '.
DATA 03/19/93
01F166S920066 001(6 MCB CAMP PENDLETON
0031 02.2
M006E1000403OS/11/94 QUANTALEX
DATA 03/19/93
01F166S920066 00166 HCB CAMP PBHDLETON
0020 02.2
H00611 000404
DATA
01F166S920066
0013
05/11/94QUAHTALEX
03/19/93
00166 HCB CAMP PEHDLETOH
02.2
DATA VALIDATION REPORT FOR HCB CAMP PENDLETOH
MATRIX: WATER PARAMETER! CHLORINATED HERBICIDE
LAB: CH2H HILL £DC« 34640
DATA VALIDATION REPORT FOR MCB CAMP PENDLETON"
MATRIX: HATER PARAMETER: TPH DIESEL
LAB: CH2M HILL SDGB 34640
DATA VALIDATION REPORT FOR HCB CAMP PEHDLBTON
MATRIX: HATER PARAMETER: TPH GASOLINE
LAB: CH2H HILL SDGt 34640 '
DATA VALIDATION REPORT FOR HCB CAMP PENDLBTOH
MATRIX: HATER PARAMETER: SEHIVOLATILES
LAB: CH2M HILL SDG» 34640
DATA VALIDATION REPORT FOR HCB CAMP PENDLETOH
MATRIX: HATER PARAMETER: VOLATILES
LAB: CH2H HILL SDGI 34640
DATA VALIDATION REPORT FOR MCB CAHP PENDLETON "
MATRIX: HATER PARAMETER: CHLORINATED HERBICIDE
LAB: CH2H HILL SDGI 34633
ADHIH RECORD
RECORD
ADMIN RECORD
ADMIN RECORD
ADHIN RECORD
ADMIN RECORD
ADHIN RECORD
DATA VALIDATION REPORT FOR MCB CAMP PENDLETON
MATRIX: HATER PARAMETER: TCL METALS HVBORON MOLYBDENUM
:t CYANIDE UB: CH2M HILL SDGK 34633
ADMIN RECORD
DATA VALIDATION REPORT FOR MCB CAMP PEHDLETON
MATRIX: HATER PARAMETER: PESTICIDESVPCBa
LAB: CH2M HILL SDGI 34633
ADMIN RECORD
DATA VALIOATIOH REPORT FOR HCB CAMP PEHDLETOH"
MATRIX: MATER PARAMETER: TPH GASOLINE
LAB: CH2H HILL SDGI 34(33
ADMIH RECORD
HATER
SOLVEHTS
HATER
HERBICIDE
HATER
HATER
TPH
HATER
SOLVENTS
HATER
VOC
HATER '
HERBICIDE
HATER
CYANIDE
WATER
PESTICIDES
PCS
HATER
TPH
-------
DATE - 08/24/91 . '
UIC No; ' DOC.HO. PRC.DATE
DOCUMENT.TYPE. . . i DOC. DATE
COWTR/CUID.,NO. . iCTO.NO..
APPROX.D. OF. PAGES' EPA. CAT*
; FROM. MCB.C""> 'MD^;"HI»Wn»nVB RECORD FILE INDEX (SORTED B* DOC. DATE)
FROM. SIGNATURE '. '
;T°'H :::::;: SUBJECT.... CLASSIFICATION
PACE - 79
000405
H00681
DATA
01F166S920066
0013
'05/11/94
; 03/19/93
:00166
,05/11/941
;03/19/93
00166
02.2
QUANTALEX
MCB CAMP PENDLETON
^QUANTAIEX
MCB CAMP PENDLETON
MCB
ADMIN RECORD
KEY NORDS
HATER
TPH
•-Site Location
000407
M006B1
DATA
01F168S9200SC
002 J
05/11/94
,03/19/93
" 001SS
WANTALEX"
MCB CAMP PENDLETOM
^
Oiri6«S920066
001«
QOANTALEX"
MCB CAMP PENDLETON
DATA VALIDATION REPORT FOR HCB CAMP PEHDLETOM"
MATRIX: WATER PARAMETER; PESTICIDESVPCB,
LAB: CHJH HILL SDGK 33«83
DATA VALIDATION REPORT FOR MCB CAKP PENDLETON"
MATRIX: SOIL PARAMETER: CHLORINATED HERBICIDE
LAB: CH2H HILL SDOK J2S20 '"o^iut
HATER
PESTICIDES
PCS
HILL SDGK 31007
MCB CAMP PENDLETON
QUANTALEX
MCB CAMP PENDLETOH
•-" «••*« vn« rn-o i.Anr rtHL/UtTO
MATRIX: HATER PARAMETER: PESTICIDESVPCBs
LAB: CH2K HILL SD<3« 34376
DATA VALIDATION REPORT MCB CAMP PENDLETOH
: «STICIDES\PCB«
MCB CAMP PENDLETON
LAB: CH2H HILL SDGK 34563
0450
DATA
01F166S920066
0019
05/12/94
03/19/93
00166
02.2
QUANTALEX
MCB CAMP PENDLETOH
DATA VALIDATION REPORT MCB CAMP PESDLETON
MATRIX: HATEU PARAMETER: PESTICIDES\PCB«
LAB: CH2M HILL SDGK J4SS3
-------
DATE - OB/24/91
UIC Ho. DOC.HO.
DOCUMENT. TYPE...
COHTR/CUIO..HO.
DA'E
PBC.
DOC. DA
CTO.HO
*rroox:».oF.PAGEs EPA.CA i
FROH
•6 FROH.SICNATURE..."."
TO
'I TO.SIGNATURE .'.'.
•«---.........«......,
HQOm 000451 05/12/1
DATA 03/1g/
01F1S6S920066 00166
0022 02-2
M006M
DATA
01F16SS920066
0021
m ' PESTICIDES\PCB,
HILL SDG» 34402
MCB CAHP PENDLETON
COAHTALElf
M00641
DATA
01FH6S920066
0028
H00681000454
DATA
01F1C6S9200C6
0027
M00681 000455
DATA
01F166S920066
0031
05/12
03/19/9
OOHS
02.2
05/J2/9
03/19/9.
OOU6
02.3
OS/12/9<
03/19/93
0016$
02.2
H006I1 000456 05/12/94
DATA 03/19/93
01F16SS920066 00156
0029 02.2
DATA
01FU(S9200<«
0013
H00681 000458"
DATA
01F166S920066
0013
000459
M00681
DATA
01F166S920066
0020
03/19/93
00166
02.2
OS/12/94
03/19/93
00166
02.2
05/12/94
03/19/93
00166
02.2
000460
M00681
DATA
OIFU6SW0066
0020
05/12/94
03/19/93
00166
02.2
PENOLETON ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD FILE INDEX (SORTED
4 QUANTALEX
3
HCB CAMP PENDLETON
SUBJECT
DATA VALIDATIOH REPORT MCB
HATRIX: HATER PARAMETER:
LAB: CH3H HILL SDG» }4414
Blf DOC. DATEI
CLASSIFICATIOH KEY HORDS
'••"""•"•••«"•«••..............
ADMIH RECORD HATER
, PESTICIDES
PCB
PACE . 10
•sl" Location
HCB CAMP PENDLETOH
OUAMTALEX
HCB CAHP PEMDLETON
ssss^cSSjra.'gEj'ss 2»»,
-
i ™ PARMffiTER-' TCL METALS H\BOROH
EfflW 4 CTAHrDE LAB: CH2M HILL SDO» 345,3
HATER
CYANIDE
QUANTALEX
MCB CAMP PENDLETON
DATA VALIDATION REPORT MCB CAHP
MATRIX: BATCH PARAMETER: TCL METALS
MOLYBDENUM 4 CYANIDE LAB: c£»TS£
RECORD
HATER
CYANIDE
QUANTALEX
MCS CAMP PENDLETON
n
MATRIX: HATER PARAMETER: TCL METALS tAROPnu
MOLYBDENUM LAB: CH2M HILL SDG» 34*79 V °H>
ADMIN RECORD
HATER
QUANTALBX
MCB CAMP PENDLBTON
QUANTALEX
MCB CAMP PENDLETON
QUANTALEX
MCB CAMP PENDLETON
MCB CAMP PENDLETOH
PARAMETER: TPH DIESEL
MOLYBDENUM LAB: CH2M HILL SDOI 34«9
•nt™^"*™ ?)«AMETER= TPH CASOLINE*TOH
MOLYBDENUM LAB: CH2M HILL SDG« 34429
1 CAMP PENDLETON
MrnvDnwii.. ..„ *: CHLORINATED HERBICIDE
MOLYBDENUM LAB: CH2M HILL SDG» 34402
OUANTAl«)C
MCB CAMP PENDLETOH
DATA VAL1DAI1UN KKPORT HCB CAHP PFMnt FTng
MATRIX: HATER PARAMETER, CHLORINATED
MOLYBDENUM LAB: CH2M HILL 8DO| 34429
ADMIN
RECORp
HATER
HERBICIDE
-------
DATE - 08/24/98
UIC NO. DOC. NO. PRC.DATE
DOCUMENT. TYPE. .. DOC. DATE
CONTR/GUID. .NO. . CTO.NO..
APPROX . » . OF. PAGES EPA. CAT!
DATA
01F166S92006S
0016
DATA
01F166S920066
0020 ;
DATA
01F166S920066
0017
M006B1 000464
DATA
OIP166S920066
0018
DATA
0018
DATA
01F166S920066
0011
H00681 000467
DATA
01F166S9Z0066
0017
DATA
01F166S920066
0022
M006B1 000469
DATA
01F166S920066
0016
M00681 000470
DATA
01F166S920066
0016
05/12/94
03/19/93
00166
02.2
05/12/94
03/19/93
00166
02.2
03/19/93
00166
02.2
03/19/93
00166
02.2
03/19/93
00166
02.2
03/19/93
00166
02.2
05/12/94
03/19/93
00166
03.2
03/19/93
00166
02.2
03/19/93
00166
02.2
03/19/93
00166
02.2
MCB CT
FROM '
FROM. SIGNATURE. .
TO....;.....
TO. SIGNATURE.
QUANTALEX
MCB CAMP PENDLETON
QUANTALEX
HCB CAHP PENDLETON
QUAHTALEX
MCB CAMP PENDLETON
MCB CAMP PEHDLETON
QUANTALEX
MCB CAMP PENDLETOH
HCB CAMP PENDLETON
QtiANTALEX
MCB CAMP PENDLETON
MCB CAMP PENDLETON
MCB CAMP PENDLETON
"JCB CAMP PENDLETON
IMP PENDLETOM ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD FILE INDEX (SORTED
SUBJECT
DATA VALIDATION REPORT MCB CAMP PENDLBTON
MATRIX: HATER PARAMETER: CHLORINATED HERBICIDE
MOLYBDENUM LAB: CH2M HILL SDO» 34117
DATA VALIDATION REPORT MCB CAMP PENDLETON
MATRIX: HATER PARAMETER: CHLORINATED HERBICIDE
MOLYBDENUM LAB: CH2M HILL SDCK 33S20
DATA VALIDATION REPORT MCB CAMP PENDLETON
MATRIX: HATER PARAMETER: CHLORINATED HERBICIDE
MOLYBDENUM LAB: CH2M HILL SDOK 33806
DATA VALIDATION REPORT MCB CAMP PENDLETON " ~
MATRIX: HATER PARAMETER: CHLORINATED HERBICIDE
MOLYBDENUM LAB: CH2M HILL SDQK 34364
DATA VALIDATION REPORT MCB CAMP PENDLETON
MATRIX: HATER PARAMETER: CHLORINATED HERBICIDB
MOLYBDENUM LAB: CH2H HILL SDGB 34349
DATA VALIDATION REPORT MCB CAMP PENDLETON "'
MATRIX: WATER PARAMETER: CHLORINATED HERBICIDE
MOLYBDENUM LAB: CH2H HILL SDG« 34376
DATA VALIDATION REPORT MCB CAMP PENDLETON
MATRIX: HATER PARAMETER: CHLORINATED HERBICIDE
MOLYBDENUM LAB: CH2M HILL SDC» 34366
DATA VALIDATION REPORT MCB CAMP PENDLETON
MATRIX: HATER PARAMETER: CHLORINATED HERBICIDE
MOLYBDENUM LAB: CH2M HILL SDB( 34563
DATA VALIDATION REPORT MCB CAMP PENDLETON
MATRIX: HATER PARAMETER: CHLORINATED HERBICIDE
LAB: CH2M HILL SDC» 34S83
DATA VALIDATION REPORT MCB CAMP PENDLETON
MATRIX: WATER PARAMETER: CHLORINATED HERBICIDE
LAB: CH2M HILL SDG* 34348
BY DOC. DATE) !
. . . CLASSIFICATION
ADMIH RECORD
1
1
1
ADMIN RECOR'D
i
!
ACM IN RECORD
i
i
ADMIN RECORD
i
ADMIN RECORt)
ADMIN RECORD
I
1
ADMIN RECORD
!
ADMIN RECORD
i
ADMIN RECORD;
!
ADMIN RECORD'
\
PACE
KEYWORDS ...site Location
HATER
HERBICIDE
HATER "
HERBICIDE
HERBICIDE
HATER —
HERBICIDE
HATER ' m- ** - -
HERBICIDE
HERBICIDE
HATER "
HERBICIDE
HATER
HERBICIDE
HATER —
HERBICIDE
HATER -—
HERBICIDE
i
i ' ',
-------
DATE - 01/14/M
UIC No. DOC.NO. PXC.DATE
OOCWBHT.TYPE... DOC.DATE
CONTO/GU1D..NO.. CTO.NO
APPROX.I.OF.PAGES EPA.CATI
M006B1 000471
DATA
01F166S920066
0020
FROH ......... .
FROH.SICHATURE ......
PEWETOH
RECORD FILE INDEX (SORTED BY
SUBJECT ...........................
DOC DATE,
PACE - 12
KEY WORDS
OS/13/94 OUANTAIEX
03/19/93
00166 HCB CAMP PENDLETON
02.2
•Site Location
M006J1 000298
DATA
ooooooooooooooo
0401
H09«l 00233-T
DATA
ooooooooooooooo
0012
05/U/94
03/22/93
'• 00166
•02.2
HESTOH MANAGERS
ROY F. HESTOH
IT CORPORATION
107/21/94 CH2M HILI,
!03/22/93 :
; 00166 MCB CAMP PENDLETON
02.2 ;
s-s-
;HATRK: HATET
'PARAHETERS: TPH-GASOLINE
JSDG: 3S427
ACHIN RECORD
ADMIN RECORD
ADHIH RECORD
HATER
HERBICIDE
SOLVENTS"
HATER
FUEL
MOOS81
DATA
J523S
0336
H006I1
DATA
3S21S
0402
Moosei
DATA
3S223
0289
000253
000291
OS/10/»4 CH2M H1LL
1 03/23/93 PEOGy A. NORTON
.00166 IT CORPORATION
02.2 BAVE MARK
"OS/11/94 CH2H HIli~
\ 03/23/93 PEOGY A. NORTON
00166 IT CORPORATION
02.2 DAVE MARK
'ui/11/34 CM2M HILL"
03/23/93 PEGGY A. NORTON
,00166 IT CORPORATION
°2.2 CAVE MARK
»«™^
AND INORGANZC PARAMETERS MCB CAMP PENDLETOH
ANALYTICAL DATA SELECTED ORGANIC"
ADHIH RECORD
ADMIN RECORD
00233367/21/94 CHZMHlii
DATA 03/23/93
OOOOOOOOOOOOOOO 0016S KCB CAHp PENDtBro(|
PESTICIDE
DIESEL FUEL
IOC
PESTICIDES
PCS
TPH
HERBICIDES
HATER
SEMIVOLATILES
SOUTHHEST DIVISION
SOUTHWEST DIVISION
SOimWEST DIVISION
SOUTHWEST DIVISION
Ob/11/94
03/24/93
00166
02.2
CH2M HILL
PEGGY A. MORTON
IT CORPORATION
DAVE MARK
ORGAN1C ADMIN RECORD
SOUTHWEST DIVISION
-------
I
-------
DATE - Ot/24/St
UICHo. DOC.HO. PRC.DATE FROH "** .*"" PEM)lmH AWINISTRAT1VE RECORD FItB INDEX (SORTED BY DOC. DATE)
DOCUMENT. TYPE. .
CONTR/CUID..NO.
APPROX.g.OF.PAG
DATA
01F1SK920066
0015
DATA
01F166S920Q66
0015
H00681 000263
DATA
01F166S920066
0015
MQ0691 000264
DATA
01F166S920066
0020
DATA
01F166S920066
0012
DATA
01F166S920066
0012
DATA
01F166S920066
0028
DATA
01F166S920066
0012
DATA
01F166S920066
0012
H00681 000270
DATA
01F166S920066
0026
. DOC. DATE FROM. SIGNATURE.
. CTO.NO. . TO
ES EPA. CATS TO.SICNATUHE. . .
05/11/9* QUAHTALEX
03/26/93
001«6 JACOBS
02.2
03/24/93
001(6 JACOBS
02.2
03/26/9)
- 00166 JACOBS
02.2
01/26/93
P0166 JACOBS
02.2
'•1 .- • ,
'OS/11/94 QUANTALEX
03/26/93
.00166 JACOBS
,;02.2
03/26/93
00166 JACOBS
02.2
03/26/S3
00166 JACOBS
02.2
05/11/94 QUANTALEX
03/26/93
001S6 JACOBS
02.2
01/26/93
00166 JACOBS
02.2
05/11/94 WASTALEX
03/26/93
00166 JACOBS
02.2
SUBJECT
DATA VALIDATION REPORT FOR HCB CAMP PENDLETON
MATRIX: HATER PARAMETER, TPH GASOLINE
LAB: CH2H HILL SDG I 34699
DATA VALIDATION REPORT FOR HCB CAMP PEHDLBTON
HATRIXt HATER PARAMETER: CHLORINATED HERBICIDE
LAB: CH2M HILL SDG 1 34611
DATA VALIDATION REPORT FOR MCB CAMP PENDLETON
MATRIX: WATER PARAMETER, TCI. METALS tl\BORAON. MOLYB-
DENUM I CYANIDE LAB, CH2H HILL SDG I 34688
DATA VALIDATION REPORT FOR MCB CAMP PENDLETON
MATRIX: HATER PARAMETER: PESTICIDESXPCBs
LAB: CH2M HILL SDG « 34681
DATA VALIDATION REPORT FOR MCB CAMP PBNDLETON "~
MATRIX: WATER PARAMETER; TPH GASOLINE
LAB: CH2M HILL SDQ « 34SS2
DATA VALIDATION REPORT FOR HCB CAMP PENDLETON
MATRIX: WATER PARAMETER: TPH DIESEL
LAB: CH2H HILL SDG « 34SS2
DATA VALIDATION REPORT FOR MCB CAMP PENDLETON
MATRIX: HATER PARAMETER: TCL METALS W\BORON. MLYBDENUM
t CYANIDE LAB: CH2M HILL SDG II 34640
DATA VALIDATION REPORT FOR HCB CAMP PENDLETON
MATRIX: HATER PARAMETER: TPH DIESEL
LAB: CH2H HILL SDG II 34721
DATA VALIDATION REPORT FOR HCB CAMP PENDLETON
MATRIX: WATER PARAMETER: TPH GASOLINE
LAB: CH2H HILL SDG » 34728
MATRIX: WATER PARAMETER: CYANIDE
US: CH2M KILL
. CLASSIFICATION
ADMIN RECORD
ADMIN RECORD
ADMIN RECORD
ADMIN RECORD
ADMIN RECORD
ADMIN RECORD
AOMIN RECORD
ADMIN RECORD
ADMIN RECORD
ADMIN RECORD
KEY HOHD3 ...Site
WATER
TPH
HATER
HERBICIDE
WATER
CYANIDE
^ HATER
PESTICIDES
PCB
HATER ;
TPH
HATER ~ -j
TPH
HATER s
CYANIDE
WATER ' 5
TPH
WATER s
TPH
WATER gi
CYANIDE
PAGE . 14
SOUTHWEST DIVISION
SOUTHWEST DIVISION
SOUTHWEST DIVISION
SOUTHWEST DIVISION
SOUTHWEST DIVISION
SOUTHWEST DIVISION
SOUTHWEST DIVISION
SOUTHWEST DIVISION
SOUTHWEST DIVISION
SOUTHWEST DIVISION
-------
DATE - 08/24/98 i
UICNo. DOC. NO. PHC. DATE FROM' **
DOOWENT.TYPE... ilDOC.DATE FROM'siGNATIJRF'
CONTR/OUID..NO.. CTO.NO.. ™OM-SIONATWE.
APPROX.O.OF.PASES ;EPA.CAT! TO.sicNATURE.' '. '.
»••-•••„. _4.».-B--
000271
M00681
DATA
01F16SS9200SS
0012
QUANTALEX
OS/11/94
03/26/93
001«« JACOBS
02.2
. CAMP^NDLETON ADMWSTRAT.VE RECORD F!LE ,NDEX (SORTED BY OOC. DATE,
SUBJECT
"" CLASSIFICATION KEY HORDS
ADMIN RECORD HATER
TPH
HOOetl
DATA
01FI66S920066
0012
M006B1
DATA
35263
0279
MODS8I
DATA
35262
0279
• 000294
000295
05/11/94
03/26/93
001S6 JACOBS
05/11/9* CH2M HItl~
03/28/93 PEGGY A. NORTON
,001S6 IT CORPORATION
02.2 DAVE KARX
8: CH2M HILL SDO« 32904
'^•niCU- DAT* SELECTED OHOANIC
OS/11/94
03/JS/93
001S«
02.2
CH2H HIM,
PECOy A. HORKW
IT CORPORATION
DAVE HARK
HQO««1
DATA
01F166S92006S
0025
M00681 000304
DATA
C1F166S920066
0019
000305
HOOfill
DATA
01FJ66S9200S$
0019
05/11/94
03/26/93
00166
02.2
^05/11/94
03/26/9J
00166
02.2
WANTALEX
»CB CAMP PENDLETON
QUNrrALEjT
MCB CAMP PENDLETON
QUANTAJLEK
MCB CAMP PENDLETON
ANALYTICAL DATA SELECTED ORGANIC"
i AND IHORBAHIC PARAMETERS PESTICIDES PCB.
.HERBICIDES C^MP PENDLETOH ' '
DATA VAMDATIOM REPORT TOB MCB CAMP
HATWX: MATER PARAHETER,
HOLYBDEHW * CVAN1DE Um
ADMIN RECORD
ADMIH RECORD
PESTICIDES
PCB
TPH
HERBICIDES
PESTICIDES"
IOG
PCB
DATA VAL1DATIOH HEfORT FOH MCB CAMP PEMD1 FTY1M
LAB:
HILL SDGD 34365
ADMIN RECORD
ADMIN RECORD
HATER
PESTICIDES
PCS
HATER
TPH
000307
K006S1
DATA
01F166S9200S6
0013
05/11/94
03/J«/93
OOH«
02.2
QOANTALSX'
HCB CAMP PENDLETON
i. Mf
MATRIX: WATER PARAMETER: TPH DIESEL
LAB: CH2MHILI, SDG» 34563
PAGE - «S
Location
SOOTHHEST DIVISION
SOUTHWEST DIUJSION
SOUTHHEST DIVISION
SOUTHWEST DIVISION
OUANTALEX
MCB CAMP PENDLBTOM
-------
DATE - 01/24/U
UIC Ho. DOC.HO. PSC.DATE FROM "^ "** PEHDLETOH «»«NISTRATIVE WCORD FILE IHOEX (SORTED BY DOC. DATE)
DOCUHENT.TYPE... DOC.DATB FHOM.SIGNATURE.'.'." "
CONTR/CUID..NO.. CtO.NO.. TO dm,™
ANWOX.i.OP.PAGES EPA.CAW TO.SIGNATURE... SUBJECT
PAGE • It
CLASSIFICATION KEY HORDS
•Site Location
HOOSI1 000309 OS/11/91 QUANTALEX
DATA 03/26/93
01FU6S920056 00166 HCB CAMP PENDLBTON
0025 02.2
H00681 000310OS/11/94QUAHTALBX
DATA 03/24/93
01FW6SJ20046 001(6 MCB CAMP PENDLETON
0026 02.2
H006J1000311 ;05/H/94 QUANTALEX
DATA 03/24/93
01F16«S920066 00166 MCB CAHP PENDLETOH
"012 02.2 ' •
H006B1 00031205/11/94QUANTALEX ~
DATA 03/25/91
01F166S920066 0016« HCB CAHP PENDLETON
0012 02.2
M00681000313 05/11/94 OUANTALEX '
DATA D3/26/9J
01FJ66S92D066 00166 HCB CAMP PENDLETON
OOU - 02.2
HOOSei 000314 :05/ll/94 QUANTALEX ~
DATA 03/24/93
01F166S920064 001« HCB CAHP PKHDLETOH
0012 = 02.2
M006I100125605/27/94HESTOM MANAGERS^
DATA 03/27/93
00166 IT CORPORATION
0013 02.2
MOOS81 000301 :OS/ll/9« HESTON MANAGERS
D"A ,03/29/93 ROY F. HESTON
ooooooooooooooo ooaes rr CORPORATION
037« , 02.2
M00681 002430 07/22/94 CH2M HILL
DATA 03/29/93
1K6 HCB CAMP PENDLETON
0025 02.2
002433 07/J2/94 CH2M HIU."
03/10/93 .
1«« HCB CAMP PENDLBTON
02.2
DATA
0030
DATA VALIDATION REPORT FOR MCB CAHP PEHDLETOH
MATRIX: WATER PARAMETER: TCL METALS N\BORON
HOLYBDEHt* k CYANIDE LAB: CH2H HILL SDC» 34365
DATA VALIDATION REPORT FOR HCB CAHP PEHDLETON
MATRIX: HATER PARAMETER: TO, METALS »\BORON,
HOLYBDEHUH t CYANIDE LAB: CH2H.HILL SDGI 3429S
DATA VALIDATION REPORT FOR HCB CAHP PENDLETON
MATRIX: MATER PARAMETER: TPH DIESEL
LAB: CH2H HILL SDC» 34376
DATA VALIDATION REPORT FOR HCB CAMP PENDLBTON'
MATRIX: HATER PARAMETER: TPH DIESEL
LAB: CH2M HIU, SDOt 34583
DATA VALIDATION REPORT FOR MCB CAMP PENDLETON"
MATRIX: WATER PARAMETER: TPH GASOLINE
LAB: CH2M HILL SDCK 34376
DATA VALIDATION REPORT FOR MCB CAHP PEHDLETON
MATRIX: HATER PARAMETER: TPH GASOLINE
LAB: CH2H HILL SDGI 31583
LABORATORY REPORT FOR HCB CAMP PENDLETON
DIOXION RFM 9303L019
LABORATORY REPORT FOR IT CORP. C1.P\3NORGANICS » N
CLP INORGANICS ANALYSIS SDC» H2700 RFHI 9302S205
9302S215. J303S237. 9303S24S MCB CAMP PENDLETON
MATRIX: HATER
PARAMETERS: TCL METALS HITH BORON.CYANIDE.AND
MOLYBDENUM SDG: 35491
MATRIX: MATER
PARAMETERS: TCL METALS HITH BORON. CYANIDE AND
MOLYBDENUM SDG: 3S50S
ADMIN RECORD
ADMIN RECORD
ADMIN RECORD
HATER
CYANIDE
HATER
CYANIDE
ADMIN RECORD HATER
TPH
ADMIN RECORD HATER
TPH
ADMIH RECORD HATER
TPH
ADMEN RECORD HATER
TPH
ADMIN RECORD DATA
ADMIN RECORD IOC
HATER
METALS
CYANIDE
HATER
METALS
CYANIDE
SOUTHHEST DIVISION
C ;
-------
DATE - 08/24/91
MCB CAMP PENDLETON ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD FILE INDEX (SORTED BY DOC. DATE)
PACE - 87
DOCUMENT /TYPE. . .
CONTR/GU1D..NO..
APPRO*. »?OF. PAGES
M00681 002339
DATA
000000000000000
0012
M00681 002422
DATA
0030
DATA
003S
DATA '
0029
DATA
000000000000000
0010
M00681 0024S1
DATA
000000000000000
0010
HOOS81 002454
DATA
000000000000000
0010
M00681 002339
DATA
oaooooooooooooo
0010
H00681 002427
DATA
002S
DATA
000000000000000
00)5
DOC. DATE
CTO.NO. .
EPA. CATS
07/21/94
03/31/93
00166
•02.2
07/22/94
OJ/31/93
166
02.2
03/31/93
1«6
'02.2
07/22/94
03/31/93
166
02.2
07/22/94
03/31/93
00166
02.2
07/22/94
03/31/93
00164
02.2
07/22/94
03/31/93
00166
02.2
07/21/94
04/01/93
00166
02.2
07/22/94
04/01/93
166
02.2
07/22/94
04/01/91
00166
02.2
FROM. SIGNATURE
TO
TO. SIGNATURE
CH2M HILL
MCB CAMP PENDLETON
CH2H HILL
HCB CAMP PENDLETON
MCB CAHP PENDLETON
CH2M HILL
HCB CAHP PEHDLETOH
CH2M HILL
HCB CAHP PENDLETON
CH2H HILL
HCB CAHP PENDLETON
CH2H KILL
HCB CAHP PENDLETON
CH2H HILL
HCB CAHP PEHDLETON
CH2H HILL
HCB CAHP PENDLETON
CH2M HILL
MCB CAHP PENDLETON
SUBJECT
MATRIX: HATER
PARAMETERS: TPH-GASOLINB
SDC: 355U
MATRIX: MATER
PARAMETERS: TCL TOTALS WITH BORON. CYANIDE, AND
MOLYBDENUM SDG: 35S1S
MATRIX: HATER
PARAMETERS! TCL HETALS WITH 80ROH, CYANIDE, AND
MOLYBDENUM SDG: 3SS31
MATRIX: HATER
PARAMETERS: TCL HETALS WITH BORON, CYANIDE, AND
MOLYBDENUM SDG: 35520
MATRIX: WATER
PARAMETERS: GENERAL CHEMISTRY
SDQ: 3S520
MATRIX: HATER
PARAMETERS: GENERAL CHEMISTRY
SDG: 355K
MATRIX: WATER
PARAMETERS! GENERAL CHEMISTRY
SDG: 35S31
MATRIX: HATER
PARAMETERS: TPH-GASOLINE
SDG: 3553J
MATRIX: HATER
PARAMETERS: TCL METALS WITH BORON. CYANIDE. AND
MOLYBDENUM SDG: 3 553 3
MATRIX: WATER
PARAMETERS: GENERAL CHEMISTRY
SDG: 35533
. . . . CLASSIFICATION
AOMIN RECORD
ADMIN RECORD"
ADMIH RECORD
ADMIN RECORD
ADMIN RECORD
ADMIN RECORD
ADMIN RECORD
ADMIN RECORD
ADMIN RECORD
.ADMIH RECORD
KEY WORDS
HATER
FUEL
HATER
HETALS
CYANIDE
HATER
METALS
CYAHIOE
HATER
HETALS
CYANIDE
HATER
HATER
HATER
HATER
FUEL
HATER
CYANIDE
METALS
HATER
SOUTHHEST DIVISION
SOUTHWEST DIVISION
SOUTHHEST DIVISION
SOUTHHEST DIVISION
-------
DATE - fli/24/31
UICKo. OOC.HO. PRC.DATE
"^C^HENT.TYPE, • DOC DATP
COHTR/OUID. .NO.." CTo'tW
APPROX.».OF.PACES EPA.CATI
H006I1 002425 07/22/94
DATA 04/02/93
• •»?,
FBOH ......... .
FRCH.SICHATURE. . .
TO ........
TO.SIGHATURB. '.'.'.'.'.
CH2HHZU,
CAMP PENDLETOH
PETOJ«OH ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD FILE INDEX (SORTED
BY DOC. DATE)
PACE -
SUBJECT
CLASSIFICATION KEYWORDS
site Location
"... .,.
••
B°*M> «««!«. AND
M006M002432
DATA
07/22/94
04/02/93
166
102.2
°)3M «"*
HCB CAHP PEHOLETOH
BOT0''- CT«""E. AHD
M00681002452
DATA
000000000000000
001]
07/22/94
04/02/93
00166
02.2
H1LL
«CB CAMP PENDLETON
*DMIN RECORD JJMER
SOUTHWEST DIVISIOH
HOOS11- 00246T
DATA {.
000000000000000
0013 ;
07/22/94
04/02/»
0016S
02.2
an» HILL
CA«P PENDLETOK
SOUTHWEST DIVISIOH
M00681 0009S4
DATA
05/18/94
04/05/93
00166 '
02.2
HESTON MANAGERS
IT CORPORATION
"MORATORY REPORT FOR MCB CAMP
VOLATIIE
ADMIN RECORD VOLATILES
H006«l 001128
DATA
3S268
0351
OS/2S/94
04/05/93
CH2H HJL1
PEOOY A. NORTON
IT CORPORATION
DAVE HARK
MOOSBi002313
DATA
OOOOOODOOOOOOOO
0015
07/21/94
04/05/93
,00166
02.2
M00681 002376
DATA
000000000000000
00)0
07/21/94
04/05/93
00166
02.2
MATRIX: HATER
PARAMETERS: PESTICIDES/PCB,
M00681 002384
OOOOOOOOOOOOOOQ
PARAMETERS: VOLATILES
MOOS8I602389
DATA
000000000000000
0010
07/21/94
04/OS/»3
00166
02.2
ADMIN RECORD HATER
HERBICIDE
"^RINATED HERBICIDES
-------
I
DATE - 08/24/98
UIC No. DOC. NO.
DOCUMENT. TYPE...
COWTR/GUID. .NO. .
APPROX.il OF. PAGE
................
. M006S1 002401
DATA
0010
M006S 1 002405
DATA
0012
M006fli 002416
DATA
0022
H00681 002420
DATA
0015
K00681 D02429
DATA
002S
H00681 002437
DATA
0019
M00681 002449
DATA
000000000000000
0010
DATA
000000000000000
0010
M006SI 002463
DATA
000000000000000
0010
M00681 002467
DATA
0010
PRC.DATE FROM
DOC. DATE FROM. SIGNATURE
;CTO.NO.. TO.
S EPA. CAT* TO. SIGNATURE '. .
07/22/94 CH2H HILL
04/05/93
;1«6 MCB CAMP PENDLETON
02.2
104/05/93
,164 MCB CAMP PENDLETON
02.2
07/22/94 CH2M HILL
04/05/93 ; ,
IS 6 MCB CAMP PENDLETON
02.2
04/05/93
1«« MCB CAMP PENDLETOH
02.2
04/05/93
166 MCB CAMP PENDLETON
02.2
04/05/93
»6« MCB CAMP PENDLETON
02.2
07/22/94 CH2M HILL
M/OS/93
0016S MCB CAMP PENDLETON
02!.2
07/2S/94 CM2M HILL
04/05/93
OOJ6S MCB CAMP PEHDLETON
02.2
04/05/93
001SS MCB CAMP PENDLETON
02:2
07/22/94 CH2M HILL
04/05/93
166 MCB CAMP PENDLETON
02.2
«ir ««ULBTON ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD FILE INDEX (SORTED
',' '
•• • SUBJECT
MATRIX: HATER
PARAMETERS: TPH-GASOLINE
SDG: 3SS4t
MATRIX : HATER
PARAMETERS: TPH-DIESEL
SDG: 35549
\
PARAMETERS: SEHIVOLAT1LES
SDO: 3554«
MATRIX: HATER "~
PARAMETERS: SEMIVOLATILES
SDO: 35549
MATRIX: HATER —
PARAMETERS: TCL METALS »ITH BORON.CYANIDE AND
MOLYBDENUM SDG: 35548
MATRIX:' HATER —
PARAMETERS: VOLATILES
SDS: 3S54I
MATRIX: HATER ••
PARAMETERS: GENERAL CHEMISTRY
SDG: 3SS49
MATRIX. HATER ~" — —
PARAMETERS: GENERAL CHEMISTRY
SDO: 3554*
MATRIX : HATER " —
PARAMETERS: TPH-DIESEL
SDG: 35516
MATRIX: HATER ~~~ "
PARAMETERS: TPH-GASOLINE
SDG: 35548
BY DOC. DATE)
'......•••.«....«....
ADMIN RECORD
ADMIN RECORD
ADMIH RECORD
ADMIN RECORD
ADMIN RECORD ~
ADMIN RECORD
ADMIN RECORD
ADMIN RECORD
ADMIN RECORD
KEY WORDS
HATER
FUEL
HATER"
FUEL
HATER
SEMIVOIATUES
HATER
S8MIVOLATILES
HATER
METALS
CYANIDE
HATER :
VOLATILES
HATER
HATER ~
HATER
FUEL
HATER
FUEL
PAGE •
• ..Sice Location
............ ..................
—
— - _
' ^ ~~~" ~~
SOUTHWEST DIVISION
SOUTHHEST DIVISION
SOUTHWEST DIVISION
-------
OATB - 01/24/91
OIC Ko. DOC.HO
DOCUMENT. TYPE. .
COHTR/CUID. .HO.
APPROX.I.OF.PACI
DATA
0012
H006B1 001252
DATA
0559
H00681 000979
DATA
35352
0219
M00681 • 000981
DATA
35337
032 S
DATA
35326
0387
M00681 002370
DATA
000000000000000
0013
DATA
000000000000000
001S
NOOm 002375
DATA
000000000000000
0020
HOT 0
. PRC.DftTZ FROM...
. DOC. DATE FROH. SIGNATURE
. CTO.HO.. TO.
SS EPA.CATI TO.SICNATURE
07/22/94 CH2M HILL
04/05/93
"« HO CAMP PEHDUTTON
02.2
05/27/91 HESTON MANAGERS
04/06/93
100166 IT CORPORATJOH
02.2
05/18/9* HESTON MANAGERS
04/07/93
00165 IT CORPORATION
02.2
OS/18/94 HESTOH MANAGERS
04/07/93
0016S IT CORPORATION
1 02.2
OS/2S/94 CH2H HILL
04/07/93 PEGGY A. NORTON
i IT CORPORATION
J02.2 DAVE MARK
:07/21/94 CH2H MILL
:04/07/93
001 66 MCB CAMP PENDLETON
02.2
Iv
07/21/94 CH2M HILL
04/07/9J
001<« HC8 CAMP PENDLETON
02.2
07/21/94 CH2M HILL
04/07/93
00166 HCB CAMP PENDLETOH
02.2
W PEHDLETOH ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD FILE ITOEX (SORTED BV DOC DATE)
i ^^^ eussmmiM
MATRIX: HATER
PARAMETERS: TPH-CASOLIHE *OHIH RECORO
SDGi 35549
LABORATORY REPORT FOR MCB CAMP PENDLETOH" " ADMIN RErnpK
CLP GCMS SEHIVOLAT1LE ANALYSIS SDGI H2714 '" RECORD
RFHI 9303S312.9303S32I
ANALYTICAL DATA FOR MCB CAMP PENDLETON ~ inum n,A
VOLAT1LES.SEMIVOLATILES.TFH. METALT ^^ RECOR°
i
AHM.VTTr»r. nkTft p^p MCD CAIir rnmrrrAu
S"^SSE>"VOtATILK-TFH- ^^."KTICIDES.PCB W"H RECOM>
ANALYTICAL DATA FOR MCB CAHP PENDLETON ADHIH RECOBli
SIS SEHIVO"TltES-^. «TWS. PESTICIDES. PCB. '" ^^
f
HftTHIX IfATER "" " ~~
PARAMETERS, CHLORINATED HERBICIDES A£*"N RECORD
^DG: 3SS65
;MATRIX: HATER ~ .
PARAMETERS; CHLORINATED HERBICIDES ADMIH RECORD
SDO: 355S9
^M»TOCV. MATEn — ,
PARAMETERS: PESTICIDES/PCBs *DKIN KEC09D
SDG: 355S5
KEY WORDS
HATER
FUEL
SEHIVOLATILE
VOLATILES
SEMIVOLATILES
TFH
METALS
VOLATILES '~
SEHIVOLATILES
TFH
METALS
PESTICIDES
PCB
HERBICIDE
VOLATILES
SEHIVOLATILES
TFH
METALS
PESTICIDES
PCB
HERBICIDES
WATER
HERBICIDE
WATER "
HERBICIDE
HATER " ~
PESTICIDES
'PCB
PAGE
• Site ....... Locution ......
-------
DATE - 08/24/9*
UIC NO. DOC.KO. PRC.DATE ; FROM. ^
WCWKNT TYPE. . . DOC.DATE FROM.SlGNATURE.'
CONTS/GUID..NO.. CTO.NO.. TO
APPROX.d.OF.PAGES EPA.CATfl TO^iGNATuiE;.'.'
PENDLETON UKimauttm RECORD FILE INDEX (SORTED BY DOC. DATE)
SUBJECT CLASSIFICATION KEY WQRCg
PACE -
•-•Site Location
MOOSei ; 002379
DATA «
000000000000000 '.
0020
07/21/94 CH2M HILL
04/07/93
00166 -MCB CAMP PENDLETON
i MATRIX: HATER
PARAMETERS:
'SCO: JSS6S
ADMIN RECORD
HATER
VOLATILES
MOOSei
DATA
ooooooooooooooo
oou
07/21/94 CH2M HILL
(04/07/93 . ;
;00166
PARAMETERS: TPH-DIESEL
PARAHETBBS.- SEMIVOLATILES
PARAMETERS: SEMI VOLATILES
07/22/94
04/07/93
16<
02.2
WATER
METALS .
CYANIDE
M00681
DATA
OOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
0013
SOUTHWEST DIVISION
Moosai
DATA
OOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
0013
SOUTHWEST DIVISION
H00681 002470
DATA
07/22/94
04/07/93
166
02.2
-------
DATE - 05/24/98
UIC Ko. DOC.NO. PKC.DATE
DOCWENT.TYPE... DOC.DATE
CONTR/COtD. .NO.. CTO.NO..
APP*OX.g.OK.PACES EPA.CATR
07/22/94
04/07/93
ISC
02.2
n,OH
FROH. ..
"
PEHDLETON ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD FRE INDEX (SORTED BY DOC. DATE)
SUBJECT CLASSIFICATION KB* WRDS
PACE - 52
•s'te Location
HOOSH 00247J
DATA
0010
CH2H HltL
HCB CAHP
MATRIX: HATER
ADHIM RECORD
WATER
FUEL
002368
DATA
000000000000000
0020
MATRIX: HATER
PARAMETERS: CHLORINATED
SDG: 3557«
H006B1 002377
DATA
000000000000000
0013
PARAMETERS: PESTICIDES/PCBl
PARAMETERS: SEMIVOLATILES
KOOC81 002428
DATA
07/22/94
04/08/93
166
HATER
METALS
CYANIDE
M006B1 OD2458
DATA
ooooooooobooooo
0015 ;
07/22/94
04/08/91
ADMIN RECORD HATER
SOUTHWEST DIVISION
H00«gl 002471
DATA
07/22/94
04/08/93
166
02.2
MATRIX: HATER
ST5S
H00661 002311
DATA.
000000000000000
0015
07/21/94
04/09/93
00166
02.2
«1LI-
NCB CAMP PEHDLETON
S55«il 002378
DATA
000000000000000
ooie
07/21/94
04/09/93
00166
02.2
ADMIN RECORD HATER
-------
DATE - 08/24/98
UICNO.; DOC.NO. PRC.DATE FROM
DOCWtENT.TYPE. . , DOC.DATE FROM.SIGNATURE
COHTH/GUID. .NO.. CTO.NO. TO
APPROX.H.OF.PAGES EPA.CATH -'' '
MM
PENDLETOH ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD FILE INDEX (SORTED BY DOC. DATE)
SUBJECT •'-•: CLASSIFICATION
PACE - 9]
KEY WORDS
•Site ...... Loc
ation ......
M00681 002182
DATA
000000000000000
0020
[07/21/94
J04/09/93
00166
i02.2
CH2H HILL
HCB CAMP PENDLETON
;MATRIX: HATER
PARAHETERS; VOLATILES
SCO; 35583
ADMIH RECORD
0010
M00681
DATA
0025
002419
M00681
DATA
000000000000000
0010 ;
=07/22/94
'04/09/91
166
02.2
•' f
;07/22/94
S4/09/93
166
02.2
07/23/94
04/09/93
0016S
: 02.2
CH2M HILL
HCB CAMP PENDLETOH
CM2M «tLL
MCB CAMP PEKDLETOH
MATRIX: HATER
PARAMETERS: SEMI VOLATILES
SOS: 35583
HATER
SEHIVOLATllES
CH2H HILL
MCB CAMP PENDLETON
MATRIX! HATER
PARAMETERS: GENERAL CHEMISTRY
SDG: 35503
HATER
H006B1 002369
DATA ;.•
000000000000000
0013
0013
07/21/94
04/13/93
00166
02.2
07/22/94
04/13/93
US
02.2
CH2M HILL
MCB CAMP PENDLETON
CH2H HILL
MCB CAMP PENDLETON
MATRIX: HATER
PARAMETERS: CHLORINATED HERBICIDES
SDG: 15601
MATRIX: HATER
PARAMETERS: TPH-DIESEL
SW: 35E01
SJOUTHHEST DIVISION
M00681 002465
DATA
,07/22/94
=04/09/93
166
02.2
PARAMETERS: TPH-GASOUNE
MCB CAMP PENDLETON
07/22/91
04/09/93
ENVIRON t SCI ENO.
MCB CAMP PENDLETON
BSE FIELD GROUP SAMPLES. CASE: NACPHaD-i'-l
CH2M HILL
PEGGY A. NORTON
IT CORPORATION
DAVE MARK
AHAMTICM. DATA FOR MCB CAMP PENDLETOH
M006S1 001286
DATA
05/27/94
04/13/93
00166
02,2
HESTON MANAGERS
IT CORPORATION
LABORATORI,_KWORT FOR MCB CAMP PENDLfTON
ADMIN RECORD VOLATILES
«763 «FH7»04si« HYDROCW1BONS "^^IS
-------
DATE - 01/24/91
Ho. DOC.NO. PRC.DATB FROM
... . FROHGNATURE.
COKTR/GUID..NO.. CTO.NO.. TO
APPROX.O.OF.PAGES EPA.CAW TO.siraATURE." ."."." '. '.'.
HOOS81 002456
DATA
ODOOOOOOOOOOOOO
0013
07/22/94 CH2H HILL
04/13/93
00166 MCB CAHP PEHDLETOH
02,2
PEHDLETOH ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD FILE INDEX (SORTED
SUBJECT
"- ,
MATRIX: WATER
PARAMBTERS, GENERAL CHEMISTRY
SDG: 35(01
DOC. DATE)
. CLASSIFICATION KEYWORDS
ADHIH RECORD HATER
MOOS81 001134
DATA
35377
0332 '
05/25/94 CH2H HILL
04/14/93 PEGGY A. NORTON
IT CORPORATION
02.2 DAVE MARK
M00681 00238T"
DATA
OOOOOQOOOOOOOOO
0027
H0068I00238T~
DATA
000000000000000
0020
MOOS81002418
DATA
0030
M00681 0024(2
DATA
000000000000000
0010
07/2l/»4
04/14/H
001(6
02.2
01/31/94
:04/14/93
,00166
|D2.2
07/22/94
04/14/93
466
'02.2
07/22/J4
04/14/93
00166
02.2
CH2M HILL
HCB CAMP PEHDLETOH
CH2H HiLL~
MCB CAHP PSHDLETOH
CH2M HI1J,
CAMP PEKDLETOH
CH2H HILL
«CB CAMP PEHDICTOH
AHALYTICAL DATA FOR HCB CAHP PENDLEToir
VOLATILES. SBUVOLATILES.TFH. HETAW
MATRIX: WATER
PARAMETERS: VOLATILES
SDG: 35623
"MATRIX: WATER"
PARAMETERS: CHLORINATED HERBICIDES
J>ix= HATER"
, PARAMETERS: SEMIVOLATILES
:SDG: 35623
MATRIX: WATER
PARAMETERS: TPH-DIBSBL
~S: 35623
ADMIN RECORD
AOMIN RECORD
VOLATILES
SEMIVOLATILES
"TFH
METALS
VOLATILES
ADMIN RECORDHATER"
HERBICIDE
WATER
SEHIVOLATILES
ADMIN RECORD
HATER
FUEL
HOOtll 002468
DATA
0010
H00681 000926
DATA
07/22/94
04/14/93
1€6
02.2
0205
K006S1
DATA
K441
0184
0011)1
04/15/93
00166
02.2
OS/25/94
04/15/93
02.2
CH2M HILL
MCB CAHP PENDLETON
WESTON MANAGERS
IT CORPORATION
CH2M HILL
PEGCY A. HORTON
IT CORPORATION
DAVE HARK
MATRIX: WATER
PARAMETERS: WH-GASOL1BE
SDO: 3S623
LABORATORY REPORT FOR MCB CAMP
9304S448
ADMIN RECORD HATER
FUEL
ADMIN RECORD VOLATILES
AHALYnCAL DATA FOR HCB CAHP
VOLATILES.
ADMIN RECORD
VOALTILES
SEMIVOLATILES
TFH
PAGE
•site ....... Location .......
SOUTHWEST DIVISION
SOUTHWEST DIVISION
METALS
-------
DATE - 08/24/98 ;'
OIC Ho. DOC.NO. PRC.DATE * fMH. . .-
DOCW1ENT.TYPE. . . j DOC. DATE FROM. SIGNATURE
CONTD/OUID. .HO. . iCTO.NO. . TO --rUKE
APPROX.I .OP. PACES; EPA.CAT* ' '
**
PENDLE™ ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD FILE INDEX (SORTED ,BY DOC DATE]
PAGE - 95
SUBJECT
CLASSIFICATION KEY WORDS
•Site Location
M00681 001132:05/25/94 CH2M HILL
5™, 04/15/93 PEGGY A. NORTON
01« „, " """'ORATION
0196 °2.2 DAVE NARK
MODHl 001136 05/25/94 CH2M HILL
DATA 04/15/93 PEGS* A. NORTON
?"7' . . IT CORPORATION
°«« .'02.2 DAVE MARK
M006I1 00113805/25/94 CH2M HILL
DATA 04/15/93 PEGGY A. NORTON
"*?7 ' IT CORPORATION
0173 02-2 DAVE MARK
0048
:OS/27/S4
;04/15/33
0016S
02.2
HESTON HANAGERS
IT CORPORATION
'••••••••'•••••••MB*
i ANALYTICAL DATA FOR HCB CAHP PENDLETON
VOLATILES, SEHIVOLATILES.TFH. METALS
ANALYTICAL DATA FOR MC8 CAMP PENDLETOH
VOLATILES. SEH1VOLATILES, TFH. METALS
ADMIN RECORD
VOLATILES
SEM1VOLATILES
TFH
ANALYTICAL DATA FDR MCB CAMP PENDLETON
VOLATILES. SEMIVOLATILES, TFH. METALS
VOLATILES
SEMIVOLATILES
TFH
METALS
VOALTILES"
SEMIVOALTILES
TFH
LABORATORY REPORT FOR MCB CAMP PENDLETON
0071
M00681002393
DATA
000000000000000
0020
05/27/94
04/15/93
00166
02.2
07/21/94
0
-------
PATS - 00/24/Sa
UICHo. DOC.HO. PRC.0ATE
KWKEHr.TYPB... DOC.DATE
COHIR/CUID. .HO.. CTO.NO
APPROXtS.OP. PAGES EPA.CAT»
HOOfill 002455
DATA
000000000000000
0010
fiflOSSI 0024(9
DATA
0010
SUBJECT
07/22/94
04/15/93
001<«
02.2
07/22/94
04/J5/93
16«
02.2
FROH "*..
-------
DATE - 00/24/96
MCB CAMP PENDLETON ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD FILE INDEX (SORTED BY DOC. DATE)
PAGE - 97
DOCUMENT. TYPE...
CONTH/GU1D..NO.. '
APPROX.d. OF. PAGES
M00681
DATA
3 5235
0074
MO 0681
DATA
35223
0064
H006SI
DATA
OOS8
MOOS 81
DATA
0041
H006I1
DATA
3S45B
07U
H00681
DATA
35471
0210
M00681
DATA
35502
0240
MO 0661
DATA
35179
024 S
H006I1
DATA
35410
0623
M00681
DATA
35491
0282
000977
000978
002235
000958
000971
000973
000974
000960
000991
000992
DOC. BATE
CTO.NO..
£PA.CAT»
OS/18/94
04/20/93
0016S
02.2
05/18/94
04/20/93
00166
02.2
07/19/94
04/20/93
166
02.2 ,
OS/1B/94
04/21/9J
00166
02.2
05/18/94
04/21/93
00166
02.2
05/18/94
04/21/93
00166
02.2
05/18/94
;04/31/93
0016S
02.2
,05/l»/94
04/21/93
00166
02.2
05/18/94
04/21/93
OOU6
02.2
05/18/94
04/21/93
00166
02. 2
FROM. SIGNATURE
TO
TO. SIGNATURE
HESTOH MANAGERS
IT CORPORATION
HESTON MANAGERS
IT CORPORATION
CH2M HILL
PEGGY A. NORTON
IT CORPORATION
DAVE MARK
HESTOH MANAGERS
IT CORPORATION
HESTON MANAGERS
IT CORPORATION
HESTON MANAGERS
IT CORPORATION
HESTON MANAGERS
IT CORPORATION
HESTON MANAGERS
IT CORPORATION
UESTON MANAGERS
IT CORPORATION
HBSTON MANAGERS
IT CORPORATION
SUBJECT .
ANALYTICAL DATA FOR MCB CAMP PENDLETON
PESTICIDES PCBfl
ANALYTICAL DATA FOR MCB CAMP PENDLETON
PESTICIDES PCBB
ANALYTICAL DATA FOR CTO »166. LRD LAB REFERENCE NO.
3S218.
LABORATORY REPORT FOR MCB CAMP PENDLETON
VOA RFH8 9303S407
ANALYTICAL DATA FOR MCB CAMP PENDLETON
TFH
ANALYTICAL DATA FOR HCS CAMP PENDLETON
TFH, VOLATILES. SEHIVOLATILES,
METALS
ANALYTICAL DATA FOR HCB CAMP PENDLETOB
TFH, VOLATILES, SEMIVOLATILES.
METALS
ANALYTICAL DATA FOR HCB CAHP PENDLETON
VOLATILES. SEMIVOLATILES. TFH, METALS
ANALYTICAL DATA FOR MCB CAMP PENDLETON
VOLATILES
ANALYTICAL DATA FOR MCB CAMP PENDLETON
VOLATILES. SEMIVOLATILES. TFH. METALS
AEHIK RECORD
ADMIN RECORD
ADMIN RECORD
ADMIN RECORD
ADMIN RECORD
ADMIN RECORD
ADMIN RECORD
ADMIN RECORD
ADMIN RECORD
ADMIN RECORD
PESTICIDES
PCS
PESTICIDES
pea
DATA
LAB
VOA
TFH
TPH
VOLATILES
SEMIVOLATILES
METALS
TFH
VOLATILES
SEMI VOLATILES
METALS
VOLATILES
SEHIVOLATILES
TFH
METALS
VOLATILES
VOLATILES
SEMIVOLATILES
TFH
METALS
-------
HCB
DATE - 01/24/91
^™£°.: KTC P°"
tn r*m * ur\ •"*"- — -•—«-»»« M
91/-C>C Ptim (->•«« •••••••»••
..... f«ifc5 EPA. CATS TO.SIONATORB...
....... •••"««................-.i____>_>>
H006U 0009,0 05/l,/94 WESTOHK^AGERS
iceii U'/*J/3J
02.4 J201JS 1T CORPORAT1PM
PACE . 9a
SUBJECT.
'
CLASSIFICATION KEY WORDS
ADHIN RECORD
•Slte ....... Location
VOLATItES
SEMIVOMTILES
PESTICIDES
VOUTILES"
SEMIVOLATILBS
PESTICIDES
S^^^oFSci^ipT5i5IS5H
IT CORPORATIOH "STICIDES. PCB.
ESTICIDES
PCS
SEMIVOLMTLES
MKU) UROUP SAMPLE.;. LAS,: HACPHSE.3.34
MOOE81 000983
DATA
o"o8 ?-°lM "CORPORATION
METALS
SEMIVOLATILES
VOLATILES
SEMI VOLATI IBS
PESTICIDES
-------
DATE - 06/24/98
UICBO. DOC.NO. PRC.DATE FROM HCB CAH[> PBNDLET0'' *0"'NISTRATIVE RECORD FltE INDEX (SORTED BY DOC. DATE)
PACE - 89
DOCUMENT. TYPE...
CONTR/GUID. .NO. .
APPROX.lt. 'OF. PACE
M00681 000731
DATA
15539
0115
DATA
0091 :
DATA ;
1071
DATA
1011
DATA
35091
0125
DATA
01FK6S920066
0015
DATA
01F166S9200S6
0031
DATA
01F166S920066
0021
DATA
01F166S9200S6
0025
DATA
01F166S920066
0062
DOC. DATE FROM. SIGNATURE.
CTO.NO.. TO... .
.S EPA. CAT* TO. SIGNATURE
OS/16/94 CH2H HILL '
04/28/93 PEGGY A. NORTON
00166 IT CORPORATION '
02.2 DAVE MARK
04/21/93
00166 IT CORPORATION
02.2
05/16/94
04/29/91
00166 MCB CAMP PENDLETOH
02.2
04/29/93
00166 MCB CAMP PENDLETON
02.2 :
04/29/91 PEGGY A. NORTON
00166 CH2H HILL
02.2 EARL. HILL
04/30/53
00166 HCB CAMP PENDLETON
02.2
04/30/93
00166 HCB CAHP PEHDLETOM
02.2
04/30/93
00166 MCB CAMP PENDLETOH
02.2
04/30/93
00166 HCB CAHP PENDLETOH
02.2
04/30/93
00166 HCB CAMP PENDLETOtf
02.2
ANALYTICAL DATA FOR MCB CAHP PENDLTON
ORGANIC AND INORGANIC PARAMETERS
LABORATORY REPORT FOR MCB CAMP PEHDLETOM
CLP/CC/MS VOLATILE ANALYSIS
SDGB H2763 RFHI 9304SS69
ANALYSIS DRTA FOR MCB CAMP PEHDLETON
ANALYSIS DATA FOR HCB CAMP PENDLEtON
ANALYTICAL DATA FOR HCB CAMP PENDLTON
PESTICIDES/PCB*
MATRIX: SOIL PARAMETER: TPH GASOLINE TPH DIESEL
LAB: CH2M HILL SDGI 026558
DATA VALIDATION REPORT MCB CAMP PENDLETON
MATRIX: HATER PARAMETER: SEHIVOLATILES CASE(t NACPBI
LAB: -ESE SDGI G29064. 028950.026341,028342
DATA VALIDATION REPORT MCB CAMP PENDIETON
MATRIX: HATER PARAMETER: TPH GASOLINE TPH DIESEL
CASEK NACPB 1 LAB: ESE SDGS 028572, G26726.G29172.C293S4
DATA VALIDATION REPORT MCB CAMP PENDLETON G2S371
MATRIX: WATER PARAMETER: CHLORINATED HERBICIDES
CASEO NACPBI LAB: ESE SDGK G29116.G2BllS.G2B4Sa.G28994
DATA VALIDATION REPORT MCB CAMP PENDLETOH G29380
MATRIX: HATER PARAMETER: TRIAZINE, PESTICIDES
CASE» NACPB: LAB: ESE SDGH 029259.029015.028626.027029
CLASSIFICATION
ADMIN RECORD
ADMIN RECORD
ADMIN RECORD
ADMIN RECORD
ADMIN RECORD
ADMIN RECORD
ADMIN RECORD
ADMIN RECORD
ADMIN RECORD
ADMIN RECORD
KEYWORDS ...Site Location
10G
VOLATILE
PESTICIDES — — _
PCS
VOC
PESTICIDES "
PCB
VOC
PESTICIDES —
PCB
TPH ~~ ~~~ ~
"HATER —
SOLVENTS
WATER
TPH
HATER
HERBICIDE
HATER ~~~
PESTICIDES
-------
DATE - 01/24/JI
"1C «o. DOC.HO. PRC.DATB
DOaWEOT.TWE... OOC.DATB
COOTS/GUID. .NO. . CtO.NO..
APPROX.S.OF. PAGES EPA.CATI
FROM
. ....
TO .
TO. siGNATURB.' '.'.'.'.'.'.'.
**"* PDIDL«ON ADMINISTRATIVE HECOBD FltB INDEX (SORTED
''''
SUBJECT..'. .....................
HOOSB1 000525
DATA
01F16SS920066
009(
05/12/94
04/JO/J3
001(6
02.2
OUANTALEX DATA VALIDATION REPORT MCB CAMP PEHDLETON G293BO
.« CAMP PEYTON $?S™ ^1^^^2^3,29104
QUANTALEX
NOi CAMP PENDLE™ SS ITSrSSSS™
BY DOC. DATE)
... CLASS1FJCATIOH
•*•»««•••••••• ••«>••••
ADMIN RECORD
PAGE . 100
KEY MORDS
PESTICIIDES
PCS
.Site...
.Location.
HCa CAMP PENDLETON LAB: xiw SSS' (SEE »DL ,N^,
«*!** «• CAMP PENDLETON G29380
r?™":^^ ««»««». tCL-METALs «V^VBDE™
MCB CAHP PENDLETOH LAB: „-££ S^? ^B
M006I1
DATA
01FK6S920066
0024
05/12/J4
04/30/93
001S6
02,2
DATA VAUUATHMJ REPORT MCB CAHP PENDLETON 029380"
MCB CAMP PENDLETOS S5,"SlTit?0
MCB CAMP PENDLETON LAB: ESE SDG» 02875? WUftILES
VOLATILES
MATRIX: SOIL PARAMETER: SEMI VOLATILES
HCB CAHP PEHDLETON LA8: ESB SDO» G28609
-------
DATE - 08/24/9J '
01C HO. DOC.NO. PRC.DATE FROM. . "".^ "ElroLETOH """"STRATIVE RECORD FILE INDEX (SORTED BY DOC. DATE)
FROM. SIGNATURE. ','.'.'.'.
SUBJECT
PACE - 101
DOCUMENT. TYPE...
CONTR/GUID. .NO..
DOC. DATE
CIO. NO..
APPRO*. «. OP. PAGES EPA. CATO
TO
TO.SIGNATURE
CLASSIFICATION KEY HORDS
• Site Locatio
M00681 000739
DATA
01F166S920066
0015
i
OS/16/94 QUAHTALEX
04/30/93
;00166 MCB CAMP PENDLETON
02.2
DATA VALIDATION REPORT FOR HCB CAMP PENDLETON
MATRIX: HATER PARAMETER: CARBAHATE/UREA PESTICIDES
LAB: ESE SDG* C3267S
H00681 000740
DATA i
01FI66S920066
0027
OS/16/94 QUANTALEX
04/30/93
'00166 HCB CAMP PENDLETON
02.2
DATA VALIDATION REPORT FOR MCB CAMP PENDLETOH~
MATRIX: WATER PARAMETER: TRIAZINE. PESTICIDES
LAB: ESE SCO) G32752
MOOS81 000741
DATA
01F1«6S92[>066
0017
M00641 000742
DATA j
Ome6S920066
0026
OS/1S/H QUANTALEX
04/30/93
00166 MCB CAMP PENDLETON
02.2
DATA VALIDATION REPORT FOR MCB CAMP PENDLETON
MATRIX: HATER PARAMETER: CHLORINATED HERBICIDES
LAB: ESE SDGB 033069
OS/16/94 QMOTALEX
04/30/93 ;
00166 HCB CAMP PENDLBTON
02.2
DATA VAUDATKJN REPORT FOR HCB CAMP PEHDLETON
MATRIX: HATER PARAMETER: CARBAMATE/UREA PESTICIDES
MB: ESE SOSI O2«S40,G291B9
H006«l000743 05/16/94 QUANTALEX
DATA 04/30/93
01FK6SJ20066 100166 MCB CAMP PENDLETON
0022 02.2
MOoSil000144OS/16/94QUAKTALEX
DATA 04/30/93
OIF166S920066 00166 MCB CAMP PENDLETON
0050 02.2
M00681 000745 OS/16/94 QUAHTALEX
DATA 04/30/93
01F16SS920066 OOK6 MCB CAMP PENDLETON
0082 02 2
K00681000746OS/16/94 QUANTALEX
DATA 04/30/93
01F166S9200E6 00166 MCB CAMP PENOLETON
0041 02.2
MOOS91 000747 05/16/94 QUANTALEX
DATA 04/30/93
01F166S920066 00166 MCB CAMP PENDLETON
0066 i . 02.2
H0068100074$05/16/94QUANTALEX
DATA 04/30/93
01F166S920066 00166 MCB CAHP PENDLETON
0014 02.2
DATA VALIDATION REPORT FOR HCB CAMP PEHDLETON
MATRIX: SOIL PARAMETER: CHLORINATED HERBICIDES
LAB: ESE SDOfl 028841.039573
DATA VALIDATION REPORT FOR HCB CAMP PENDLBTON
MATRIX: HATER PARAMETER: CHLORINATED HERBICIDES
LAB: ESE SDGS G31087.G30577,030271
DATA VALIDATION REPORT FOR MCB CAMP PENDLETON
^MATRIX: HATER PARAMETER: SEMIVOLATILES
LAB: ESE SDG* G30«74
DATA VALIDATION REPORT FOR MCB CAMP PENDLETON
MATRIX: HATER PARAMETER: TCL HETALS H\BORON CYANIDE
t MOLYBDENUM LAB: ESB SDO» G30457.G30624.030428
DATA VALIDATION REPORT FOR MCB CAMP PENDLETON
MATRIX: SOIL PARAMETER: TCL METALS H\MOLYBDENUM
LAB: ESE SDG» G29147.G28759.G29521, ETC
DATA VALIDATION REPORT FOR HCB CAMP PENDLETON
MATRIX: WATER PARAMETER: GENERAL CHEMISTRY
LAB: ESE SDGI 346S1
ADMIN RECORD PESTICIDES
" HATER
ADMIN RECORD
ADMIN RECORD
HATER
PESTICIDES'
HATER
HERBICIDE
ADMIN RECORD NATER
PESTICIDES
ADHIN RECORD HERBICIDE
ADMIN RECORD HATER
HERBICIDE
ADMIN RECORD MATER
ADMIN RECORD HATER
METALS
CYANIDE
ADMIN RECORD METALS
ADMIN RECORD HATER
-------
BATE - 01/24/91
UIC Ho. DOC.HO. PRC.DATE
KcS:: S5:SS" ™*:^*™*.'":
APPRO*.f.OF.PAOES EPA.CATI — -.—-—-
«««««««*"« RKO»0 PILE INDEX .SORTED BY° DOC DATE,
' '
KOOCI1 000749
DATA
01F1«S920066
0019
05/16/94
04/30/93
00166
02.2
OUANTALEX
HCB CAMP PENDLETON
CAHP
'••••»»•«•••••«
AWHH RECORD
KEY WORDS
*"••••••»••••••
HATER
PACE . 10,
.Location
«?.™L»'°« ««> CAHP PEHDLETON
MOOCtl 000751
DATA
01F166S9200G6
0021
HOOStl 000752*
DATA
01F166S920066 '
0040
OS/16/94
04/30/93
00166
.02.2
000753
DATA
01F1S6S920066
0072
MOOS81000754
DATA
01F166S920066
0026
H006S1^000755
DATA
01F166S920066
0057
000756
DATA
C1F1SSS920066
0084
000757
DATA
01F166S920066
0040
H006I1000751
DATA
01F166S920046
0037
;"04/30/93
•ooieg
,;02.a
OS/16/94
04/30/93
00166
•02.2
"05/16/94
, 04/30/93
.00166
02.2
04/30/93
00166
02.2
05/17/94
04/30/93
00166
02.2
05/17/94
04/30/93
00166
02.2
OS/17/94
04/30/93
00166
02.2
OUANTALEX
MCB CAMP PENDLETOH
OUAHTALEir
KCB CAMP PEHDLETOH
"CUANTAT5r
MCB CAHP PENDLETON
«CB CAHP PENDLETON
OUANTALEX
HCB CAHP PENDLETON
DATA VALIDATIOH REPORT tUH MCB CAHP
MATRIX: KATER PARAMETER: VOLATlS
LAB: ESE SDB» C32437, C324»7
ADHIN RECORD
ACHIN RECORD
HATER
VOIATILES
HATER
METALS
CWAIDE
HATER
METALS
CVHAIDE
W8: ESE SDG« 530479.G3070S
HATER
SEHIVOLATlJjES
HCB CAHP PEKDLETOH
MOLYBDENW, LAB: ESE SOGK 03030«; «o
ADMIN RECORD
ADHIN RECORD
HCB CAMP PENDLETON
QUANTALEX
HCB CAMP PENDLETON
DATA VALIDATIOH REPORT KOR HCB
-------
DATE - 08/24/98
uic NO. DOC.NO. VPRC.DATE FROM "" **"* PEMI)LETOH ^""STRATIVE RECORD FILE INDEX (SORTED BY DOC. DATE)
PAGE - 101
DOCUHEHT.TYPE. . .
COUTH/QUID.. NO..
DOC. DATE
CTO.NO..
APPROX.tf: OF. PAGES EPA.CATH
M00681 : 000759
DATA
01P16SS920066
0031
DATA
01FIS6S920066
0096
DATA
0174
DATA
35519
0225
DATA
35513
0293
DATA
35601
0336
.<
DATA ;
35565
0333
DATA
35576
0426
os/n/94
,04/30/93
00166
02.2
04/30/93
00166
.'02.2
OS/04/93
00166
02.2
[05/04/93
00166
02.2
'
jOS/OS/93
obiss
02.2
"' :
05/05/93
00166
02. 3
OS/05/93
00166
02.2
OS/OS/93
00166
02.2
FROM. SIGNATURE
TO
TO. SIGNATURE
QUWJTALEX
MCB CAMP PENDLETON
HCB CAMP PENDLETON
HCB CAHP PENDLETON
PEGGY A. NORTON
IT CORPORATION
DAVE MARK
i" - ;: '
PEGGY A. NORTON
IT CORPORATION
DAVE MARK
PEGGY A. NORTON
IT CORPORATION
DAVE MARK
PEGGY A. NORTON
IT CORPORATION
DAVE MARK
PEGGY A. NORTON
IT CORPORATION
DAVE HARK
DATA VALIDATION REPORT FOR MCB CAMP PENDLETON
MATRIX: HATER PARAMETER: GENERAL CHEMISTR*
LAB: ESE SCO* G30076, ETC.
DATA VALIDATION REPORT FOR MCB. CAMP PEHDLETON
MATRIX: SOIL PARAMETER: CARBAMATE\UREA PESTICIDES
LAB: ESE SDGft 026905, ETC.
LABORATORY REPORT FOR MCB CAMP PENDLTON
TOTAL EXTRACT-ABLE HYDROCARBONS ANALYSIS
SDGg H2763 RFHI 9304S44I
| " 1 . j
ORGANIC AND INORGANIC PARAMETERS
: i
ANALYTICAL DATA MCB CAMP PENDLETON ,
METALS, PESTICIDES, PCB. TFH. HERBICIDES
! •• •' •
ANALYTICAL DATA MCB CAMP PENDLETON
METALS. PESTICIDES, PCB, TFH, HERBICIDES
ANALYTICAL DATA MCB CAMP PENDLETON
METALS, PESTICIDES, PCB, TFH, HERBICIDES
ANALYTICAL DATA MCB CAMP PENDLBTON
METALS. PESTICIDES, PCB. TFH, HERBICIDES
.. CLASSIFICATION KEY HORDS ...Site Location
ADMIN RECORD HATER
ADMIN RECORD PESTICIDES "~~ " ~
ADMIN RECORD TEH" — ~ '
ADMIN RECORD IOO " — " —
PESTICIDES
TFH
HERBICIDE
METALS
ADMIN RECORD METALS ~~~~ — ~~
PESTICIDES
TFH
HERBICIDE
ADMIN RECORD METALS " ~
PESTICIDES
TFH
HERBICIDE
ADMIN RECORD METALS ~ ~" ' ~
PESTICIDES
TFH
HERBICIDE
ADMIN RECORD METALS ' ""
PESTICIDES
TFH
HERBICIDE
-------
DATE - 01/24/91
"1C Ho. DOC. NO. PRO DATE
WCWCHT.TYPE... «,§ gg*
CWTR/CUID..KO.. CTO.NO
APPKOX.I.OF.PAGES EPA.CATI
Sice...
.Location...
SUBJECT........
OS/13/94
OS/06/JJ
00166
02.2
CH2H HILL
PZCCY A. HORTON
OUH HILL
EARL BYRON
MOOSli
DATA
000000000000000
0030
07/21/94
05/06/93
00166
02.2
»CB CAMP PENDLETON
BORON. CYANIDE. AND HOLY- **'"' RECC"">
002344
DATA
040000000000000
0021
07/2X/94
05/06/93
OOK6
02.2
CH2H HILL
CAW PENDLETON
HOOSil002346
DATA
000000000000000
002B
07/21/94
OS/06/93
00166
02.2
«CB CAMP PENDLBTON
*«„, MCPH6D
M00681 002362
DATA
000000000000000
0013
PACK . !„<
M006n 002400"
DATA :.
ooooooooboooooo
0013
M0068I002439^
DATA
ooooooooooooooo
0015
07/22/94
05/06/93
00166
02.2
~07/22/94
OS/06/93
00166
02.2
CH2H HILL
' CAHp PENDLETON
~KATRIXi WATEF
PARAMETERS!
SDQ: 35781
ADHIN RECORD iJATEB
FUEL
H00681 000317
DATA
3S633
0353
OS/11/94
05/07/93
00166
02.2
CH2M HILL
PEGGY A. NORTON
IT CORPORATION
DAVE HARK
PESTICIDES
VOC
TFH
HERBICIDES
soirrHHEsr Djvisioij
-------
DATE - 01/24/98
OIC NO. DOC.NO. PRC.DATE Mm ......... *?. °WP I''ENOI'ETON ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD FILE INDEX (SORTED BY DOC. DATE)
' ' ' ' '
DOCUHENT.TYPE. . . DOC. DATE FROM. SIGNATURE
CONTR/GUID. .NO. . CTO.NO. . TO..
APPROX.tt OF PAGES EPA CATK TO SIGNATURE
— ............ ..^...... ..«...„.. ............
M00681 000318 05/11/94 CH2H HILL
?*?* 05/07/93 PEOCV A. NORTON
15633 001*6 IT CORPORATION
0369 02.2 DAVE HARK
H006B1 000319 05/11/94 CW2H HILL
?*JA •. OS/07/93 PEGGY A. NORTON
*s™7 001SS IT CORPORATION
0309 ; 02.2 DAVB MARK
M00681 ;000534 =05/12/94 QUAMTALEX
DM* 05/07/93
01F166S920066 00166 MCB CAMP PENDLETON
DATA 05/07/93
01F166S920066 001S6 «CB CAMP PENDLETON
0026 02.2
M00681 000536 05/12/94 QUANTALEX
DATA 05/07/93
01F166S930066 00166 HCB CAMP PENDLETON
0024 02.2
H00681 000537 05/12/94 QUANTALEX
DATA 05/07/93
01F166S920066 00166 HCB CAMP PENDLETON
0022 02.2
M00681 000623 05/13/94 QUANTALEX
DATA 05/07/93
01P16SS9200S6 00166 HCB CAMP PENDLETON
0026 02,2
M00681 000624 05/13/94 QUANTALEX
DATA 05/07/93
01F166S920066 00166 MCB CAMP PENDLETON
0022 02.2
DATA 05/07/93
01F166S920066 00166 MCB CAMP PENDLETON
0021 02.2
• • • SUBJECT
................... .«.«....«..„.....,„„.. _>11!it|(jt<|
ANALYTICAL DATA FOR MCB CAMP PENDLETON PCB»\PEST~
VOLATILES. TFH GASOLINE AND DIESEL. HERBICIDES
?
DATA VALIDATION REPOH'l' MCB CAMP PENDLETON G293SO
. MATRIX: HATER PARAMETER: SEMIVOLATILES
LAB: CH2M HILL SDG» 35427
DATA VALIDATION REPORT HCB CAMP PENDLETOH S29380
MATRIX: HATER PARAMETER: SEMIVOLATILBS
LAB: CH2H HILL SDGB J5379
DATA VALIDATION REPORT MCB CAHP PEWDLETON G29380
MATRIX: WATER PARAMETER: SEMIVOLATILES
LAS: CH2H HILL SDG» 35352
££A,vAL;!i!OTIWi *EPOHT >KB V™ PEUDLETON 029380
MATRIX: HATER PARAMETER: SEMIVOLATlLES
LAB: CH2M HILL SDG« 35407
SC™,vAL^DATl°H REPORT FOR MCB CWtP PENDLRTOrf
MATRIX: WATER PARAMETER: SEMIVOLATILES
WB: CH2M HILL SDG» 35337
».«..« ALlUATlON REPORT FOR MCB CAMP PENDLETON
MATRIX: HATER PARAMETER: VOLATILES
tAB: CH2M HILL SDG» 35379
DATA VALIDATION REPORT FOR MCB CAMP PENDLETON
MATRIX: HATER PARAMETER: VOLATILES
LAB; CH2M HILL SDGd 35337
CLASSIFICATION m WORDS . . .site Location
•—..
tCIDES ADMIN RECORD PCB
PESTICIDES
VOC
TFH
HERBICIDES
PESTICIDES
VOC
TFH
HERBICIDES
SOLVENTS
ADMIN RECORD HATER ~~ _
SOLVENTS
ADMIN RECORD HATER ' •
SOLVENTS
ADMIN RECORD HATER ~ — —
SOLVENTS
ADMIN RECORD HATER — —
SOLVENTS
ADMIN RECORD HATER ~~
ADMIN RECORD HATER ~~ '
PAGE - 105
-------
DATE - 01/24/91
OIC Ho. DOC.KO. PRC.DATE FROM "?? ™? PENDLEra< """"STRATIVE RECORD FILE INDEX (SORTED BY DOC. DATE)
DOCOMEJfT.TYPE... DOC.DATE FROH.SICHATURE!!!!!!
COHTH/GUID. .HO.. CTO.SO.. TO cunjprr
APPROX.I.OF.PACES EPA.CATI TO.SICHATOTE SUBJECT CLASSfFICATIOH
PACE - 106
KEYWORDS
•Site Location
H00681 000626
DATA
01FU6S92006C
0019
05/13/94 OUANTALEX
05/07/93
0016« HCB CAMP PEHDLETOH
02.2
DATA VALIDATION REPORT FOR HCB CAMP PEHDLETOH
MATRIX: WATER PARAMETER: VOLATILES
LAB: CH2M KILL SDGI 15407
M006B1OOOSZ7 OS/13/94 QUANTALEX
DATA OS/07/93
D1F166S920066 00166 HCB CAMP PENDLETON
0020 02.2
DATA VALIDATION REPORT FOR HCB CAMP PEHDLETOlT
MATRIXi HATER PARAMETER: VOLATILES
LAB: OHM HILL SDG» 35352
M0068I00032205/11/94 HESTION MANAGERS
DATA OS/10/9J ROY P. HESTON
00166 IT CORPORATION
01GG 02.2
LABORATORY REPORT FOR IT CORP. MCB CAMP PENDLETON"
CLPSORCANOCHLORINE PESTICIDES AHALYSIS SDOI W2763
RFHfl 9304S569
M006II ,000321 05/11/94 WESTI ON MANAGERS
DM* 05/11/93 ROY F. HESTOM
00166 IT CORPORATION
0311 02.2
M00681 000420 OS/11/94 QUANTALEX
DATA 05/14/93
01F166S920066 00166 HCB CAMP PBHDLETON
0014 02.2
H00641 000421
DATA
01F166S920066
0013
MOOtOl 000422
DATA
01F166S920066
0013
OS/11/94 QUANTALEX
05/14/93
00166 HCB CAMP PENDLETON
'02.2 -• •• '
05/11/94 OUAKTALEX
OS/14/93
00166 MCB CAMP PENDLCTON
02.2
000423"
DATA
01F16GS920066
0013
05/11/94 QUANTALEX
05/U/M
00166 HCB CAMP PENDLETOH
02.2
M0068100042405/11/94QUANTALEX
DATA :OS/14/93
OIF166S920066 00166 MCB CAMP PEKDLETON
00i7 : 02.2
M00681 000425 05/11/94 QUAKTALEX~
DATA 05/14/93
01F166S920066 06166 MCB CAMP PENDLETON
oow ; 02.2
LABORATORY REPORT FOR IT CORP. HCB CAMP PEHDLETOH
CLP\IHOREAU1C METALS ANALYSIS SDGi U2763
RFWf 9304S448, 9304S569
DATA UALIDATIOH REPORT FOR MCB CAMP PENDLETOJi"
MATRIX: WATER PARAMETER: GENERAL CHEMISTRY
LAB: CH2M HILL SDCD 35377
DATA VALIDATION REPORT FOR HC8 CAMP PENDLETOM
MATRIX: HATER PARAMETER: GENERAL CHEMISTRY
LAB: CH2H HILL SDG* JSJ52
DATA VALIDATION REPORT FOR HCB CAMP PENDLETON
MATRIX: HATER PARAMETER: GENERAL CHEMISTRY
LAB: CH2M HILL SDGd 35337
DATA VALIDATION REPORT FOR MCB CAMP PENDLETON
MATRIX: WATER PARAMETER: GENERAL CHEMISTRY
LAB: CH2M HILL SDG» 35326
DATA VALIDATION REPORT FOR MCB CAMP PENDLETON
MATRIX: HATER PARAMETER: CHLORINATED HERBICIDES
LAB: CH2M HILL SDG» 3532S
DATA VALIDATION REPORT FOR MCB CAMP PENDLETON
MATRIX: HATER PARAMETER: CHLORINATED HERBICIDES
LAB: CH2M HILL SDGI 35337
ADMIN RECORD HATER
ADMIN RECORD WATER
ADMIN RECORD PESTICIDES
ADMIN RECORD IOQ
ADMIH RECORD HATER
ADMIN RECORD
ADMIN RECORD
ADMIN RECORD HATER
ADMIN RECORD HATER
AGMIN RECORD HATER
HATER
HERBICIDES
HATER
HERBICIDE
-------
DATE - 08/24/98
PAGE - 10V
UIC No. DOC. NO. PRC.DATE
DOCUMENT. TYPE... DOC. DATE
CONTR/GUID. .NO. . • CTO.NO..
APPROX.lt. OF. PAGES EPA. CATS
M00681 000426
DATA
01FU6S920066
0013
DATA
01F166S920066
0013
DATA
01F166S920066
0026
DATA
01F166S920066
002S
DATA :
01F1SSS920066
0032
DATA
01F166S92006*
0015
DATA
01F166S920066
0013
DATA
01F166S920066
0013
M00661 OOOS16
DATA
01F166S920066
0011
DATA
Q1F166S930066
0009
05/12/94
. 05/14/93
• 00166
02.2
j 05/14/93
: 00166
02.2
OS/14/93
00166
02.2
OS/12/94
OS/14/93
00166
02.2
, OS/14/93
00166
02.2
05/14/93
00166
02.2
05/14/93
00166
02.2
OS/14/93
00166
02.2
05/12/54
OS/14/93
00166
02.2
OS/14/93
00166
02.2
FROM
FROM. SIGNATURE. . . .
TO
TO. SIGNATURE
QUANTALEX
MCB CAMP PENDLETOH
MCB CAMP PENDLETON
MCB CAMP PENDLETON
QUANTALEX
MCB CAMP PENDLETON
HCB CAMP PENDLETOH
HCB CAMP PENDLETON
MCB CAMP PENDLETOH
HCB CAHP PENDLETON
QUANTALEX
MCB CAHP PENDLETON
QUANTALEX
MCB CAMP PENDLETON
fvnlKf Dl |JV\.. UAJ&I
:
SUBJECT r
-------
DATE - OI/24/9B
DOC-K°- PRC-MTE
E... DOC.DATE
D. .NO. . CTO.NO
APPROX.S.OF.PAOES EPA.CAM
™* ......... "!"
FROM.SICNATURE !
TO
' '''''
PEHDIETON
RECORD FILE IHDEX (SORTED
SUBJECT
H006I1 Q00518
DATA
01F166S9200C6
ODD
05/12/94
05/14/93
OOU6
-02.2
OUANTALEX
MCB CAMP PENDLETON
61 DOC. DATE)
... CLASSIFICATION KEYWORDS
""•"—""-• •>...........,
ADHIN RECORD HATER
PACE . I0,
.Location. ...
05/12/94
OS/14/9J
00166
02.2
QUAHTALEX
HCB CAHP PENDLETON
ADHIN RECORD HATER
H006I1
DATA |
01F166S920066
0014
05/12/94
105/14/93
0016S
02.2
QUAHTALEX
MCB CAHP FENDLETON
ADMIN RECORD HATER
000528
DATA
OIF166S92006S
0013
05/12/94
05/14/93
0016S
02.2
QUACTALEX
HCB CAMP FEMJLETON
ACHIN RECORD HATER
«006i
DATA
01F1663920066
0013
WWIM£X ££^™™. ^ggi** <**»«««. 029350
HCB CAMP PENDLETON
ADHIH RECORD HATER
H006J1
DATA
01FU6S920066
0010
05/12/94
05/17/91
00166
02.2
ADHIH RECORD METALS
MCB CAHP PETOLBTOH
ADHIN RECORD MATER
DATA VALIDATION REPORT FOR MCB CAMP PENDLETON
SOOTHHEST DIVISIOM
-------
DATE
"1C HO. DOC;N0
D001NENT.TYPE .
CONTR/CUI0. NO
APPRO*. ». op.
M006J1 000277
DATA ;
OIFU«SS30066' '
0033 ! | •
PRC.DATB FROM.
DOC.DATE PRO
CTO.NO.. TO
JP*-«« TO.sicNATUHE.'
%£& •**"*«
««« JACOBS
0020
000279
05/21/93
00166 i
02.2
~bl7iT7»T
05/21/93
001««
02.2
"OUAMTALES"
JACOBS
OUABTALEX
JACOBS
01F1««S92006«
oois !
OS/21/93 CWMTALEX
i °°»«« , JACOBS
02.2
H006S1
DATA
Om
0016
"flbo2Bl"
000282
05/21/93
00166 JACOBS
0016
Sown
DATA
01F166S9200SG
0017
DATA
01F1S6S9200S6
0033
OOOZ1S
OS/11/94
OS/21/9J
OOU6
02.2
JACOBS
05/21/93
001«« JACOBS
«/2i/M a""™"
«««« JACOBS
OS/11/91
01FWSS92006S SoU6/93
0020
02.2
JACOBS
CAHP PWDLETO« ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD »l.
.';.;; 9 FILE INDEX
'' : SUBJECT
>°C. DATE)
CLASSIFICATION
*°*UI RECORD
"RECORD"
'"RECORD"
-TECORD
"RECORD"
PACE -
WORDS
WATER
PESTICIDES
PCB
"WATER*
PESTICIDES
PCB
WATER
PESTICIDES
PCS
HATER
PESTICIDES
PCB
•'Site Location
SOtTTHHEST DIVISICW
SOWHHEST
"WATER
PESTICIDES
PCB
DIVISJ55
~ ADMIN RECORD '
~"AUHIN RECORD""
"ADMIN RECORD ™
"WATER"
PESTICIDES
Pea
voc
DATA
01FU6S9200SS
0021
05/11/9, W^Sr
°°«6 JACOBS
02.2
PCB
». CH2H .uTsrsi.*"""-^
AW^NRKORB PESTlcTDEF
PCB
-------
turn - oi/24/ja
UIC Ho. DOC. HO.
DOCUKEHT.TYPE. . .
COWTR/GUID..NO. .
APPRO*. 1. OP. PAGE
DATA
01FI66S9200C6
0021
DATA
01F166S920066
001J
DATA
01F166S92006C
0026
DATA
01F166S920066
0027 ,
DATA
01F166S920066
002$
DATA
01F16SS920066
0012
M006II 000365
DATA
01F166S920066
0013
MOQ681 000366
DATA
oiFK6S92oo66
0012 :
DATA
01F1S6S92006S
0013
DATA
01F166S920066
0019
PHC.DATE FROM
DOC.DATE FROM. SIGNATURE
CTO.NO.. TO
OS/11/94 OUAHTALEJC
OS/21/9J
00166 JACOBS
02.2
OS/21/93
00166 JACOBS
02.2
05/21/93
. 00166 JACOBS
02.2
OS/21/93
00166 JACOBS '
02.2
OS/21/93
00166 MCB CAMP PENDLETCN
02. 3
OS/21/J3
00166 MCB CAMP PENDLETON
02.2
OS/21/93
001SG HCB CAMP PENDLETON
02 . 2
OS/21/93
00166 HCB CAMP PENDL6TON
02.2
OS/21/93
001« MCB CAMP PENDLETON
02.2
05/21/93
00166 HCB CAMP PENDLETON
02.2
ffir rwwujun JumiNisiXATIVE RECORD FILE INDEX (SORT!
SUBJECT
DATA VALIDATION REPORT FOR HCB CAMP PENDLETON
MATRIX: HATER PARAMETER: CYANIDE
LAB: CH2H HILL SOCK 33683
DATA VALIDATION REPORT FOR HCB CAMP PENDLETON
MATRIX: HATER PARAMETER: TPH GASOLINE
LAB: CH2H HILL SDGI JS104
DATA VALIDATION REPORT FOR HCB CAMP PENDLETON ~
MATRIX: RATER t SOIL PARAMETER: PESTICIDES\PCBo
LAB: CH2H KILL SDGK 35104
DATA VALIDATION REPORT FOR HCB CAMP PENDLETON "~
MATRIX: SOIL PARAMETER! TCL METALS H\MOLYBD£NIM •
LAB: CH2H HILL SDGI 35091
DATA VALIDATION REPORT FOR HCB CAMP PENDLETON
MATRIX: WATER PARAMETER: SEMIVOLATILES
LAB: CH2H HILL SOCK 3SS02
DATA VALIDATION REPORT FOR MCB CAMP PENDLETON
MATRIX: HATER PARAMETER: TPH GASOLINE
LAB: CH2M HILL SDG» 35379
DATA VALIDATION REPORT FOR HCB CAMP PENDLETOH
MATRIX: HATER PARAMETER: TPH GASOLINE
LAB: CH2M HILL SDGB 34681
DATA VALIDATION REPORT FOR MCB CAMP PENDLETOH
MATRIX: WATER PARAMETER: TPH GASOLINE
LAB: CH2H HILL SDGI J5520
DATA VALtDATlOH REPORT FOR HCB CAMP PENDLEToiT
MATRIX: HATER PARAMETER: TPH GASOLINE
LAB: CH2M HILL SDGI 3SS31
DATA VALIDATION REPORT FOR HCB CAMP PENDLETON
MATRIX: SOIL PARAMETER: VOUTILES
LAB: CH2M HILL SDGI 3507 J
•0 Blf DOC. DOTE)
ADHIN RECORD
ADMIN RECORD
ADHIN RECORD
ADHIN RECORD
ADMIN RECORD
ADHIN RECORD
ADHIN RECORD
ADHIN RECORD
ADHIN RECORD
ADMIN RECORD
KEY WORDS
HATER
CYANIDE
HATER
TPH
HATER ~~
PESTICIDES
PCB
DATA
METALS
HATER
SOLVENTS
HATER
TPM
HATER •
TPH
HATER
TPH
HATER
TPH
VOC
PACE
•••Site LOGIC Ion
SOUTHWEST DIVISION
SOUTHWEST DIVISION
SOUTHWEST DIVISION
SOUTHWEST DIVISION
-------
DATE - 08/24/98 i ; • : :
UIC NO. DOC.HOJ iPRC.DATE FROM.........^ .^ PENW'EION ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD FILE INDEX (SORTED BY DOC. DATE)
DOCUMENT.TYPE. .
CONTU/CUID. .NO.
APPROX.fr. OF. PAQ
H006II 000369
DATA
01F166S920066
0022
H00681 000370
DATA
01FU6S920D66
0020
DATA
01F166S92006*
OD21
DATA
01F166S9200SS
0021
M00601 000373
DATA
01F166S920066
0021
DATA
OIF166S920066
0019
HOOO1 000375
DATA
01FH6S9200((
0019
DATA
01FH6S92C066
0017
M00681 000377
DATA
01F166S920066
0022
H00681 000376
DATA
01F166S92006S
0023
.'iDOC.DATE 'FROM. SIGNATURE. .
. • jCTO. NO.. TO
05/11/94 OUANTALEX
,05/21/93 .
00166 MCB CAHP PENDLETON
02.2
05/11/94 OUANTALEX
05/21/93
P016« HCB CAHP PENDLETOH
!02.2
•; 05/11/94 QUANTALEX
': OS/21/93
00165 HCB CAHP PENDLETOH
;02.2
OS/11/94 OUANTALEX
. 05/21/93
001SS HOT, CAMP PENDLETON
02.2
OS/Z1/93
00166 MCB CAMP PENDLETON
02.2
OS/11/94 QUANTALEX
05/21/93
00166 MC8 CAMP PENDLBTON
02.2
05/21/J3
00166 HCB CAMP PEMDLETOH
02.2
05/11/94 QUAHTALEX
05/21/93
0016« MCB CAHP PENDLETON
02.2
OS/11/94 QUAWTALEX
05/21/93
00166 MCB CAMP PENDLETON
02.2
05/21/93
00166 HCB CAMP PENDLETON
02.2
SUBJECT
DATA VALIDATION REPORT FOR HCB CAHP PENDLETON
MATRIX: HATER PARAMETER: VOLATILES
LAB: CH2H HILL SDGK 3S502
DATA VALIDATION REPORT FOR HCB CAMP PENDLETOM
MATRIX: HATER PARAMETER: VOLATILES
LAB: CH2H HILL SDG« J5502
DATA VALIDATION REPORT FOR HCB CAHP PENDLETON
MATRIX: HATER PARAMETER: VOLATILES
LAB; CII2H HILL SDGI 3SS18
DATA VALIDATION REPORT FOR MCB CAMP PENDLETON
MATRIX: HATER PARAMETER: VOLATILES
LAB: CH2M HILL SDGD 35491
DATA VALIDATION REPORT FOR HCB CAMP PENDLETON
MATRIX: MATER PARAMETER; VOLATILES
LAB: CH2H HILL SDGB 35879
DATA VALIDATION REPORT FOR KCB CAMP PENDLETON
MATRIX: HATER PARAMETER: VOLATILES
LAB: CH2M HILL SDGI 35471
DATA VALIDATION REPORT FOR HCB CAHP PENDLBTON
MATRIX: HATER PARAHETER: VOLATILES
IAS: CH2M HILL SDGS 3S470
MATRIX: HATER PARAMETER: VOLATILES
LAB: CH2M HILL SOCK 34117
UATA VALIDATION REPORT FOR MCB CAHP PENDLETON
HATRIX: HATER PARAMETER: VOLATILES
LAB: CH2M HILL SDG9 3S32S
DATA VALIDATION REPORT FOR MCB CAMP PENDLETOH
MATRIX: HATER PARAMETER: VOLATILES
LAB: CH2M HILL SDGt* 3S377
UNIFICATION KEYWORDS ...Site Location
•••».».«.«.....„..... •»•»•««••»..»» ......«„ ...... '
ADMIN RECORD HATER
VOC
VOC
ADMIN RECORD HATCR " ' "" '
VOC
ADMIN RECORD HATER ~~~ _
VOC
ADMIN RECORD HATER ' " •
VOC
ADMIN RECORD HATER ~~ : •
VOC
ABH1N RECORD HATER " —
VOC
ADHIH RECORD HATER ' ~ —
VOC
ADMIN RECORD HATER ' ~
VOC
ADMIN RECORD HATCR '
VOC
-------
DATE . 01/24/51
UJC Ho. DOC.HO.
DOCUKENT.TYPE..
COHTR/GUIO. .NO.
-••...i/nio FROM
OOC.DATE FHOM.SJCNATORE.'
m«'^'uu"J"WJ-- CTO.NO.. TO
«±!!:!:°r;.p^f!.!™;^i;..™-slcNA^:::
P£«DLE™ ADMINISTRATE* HOMO FILE INDEX (SORTED
] ......... ........... SUBJECT .................
...........
BV DOC. DATEI
... CLASSIFICATIOM KEY HOHDS
PACE .
H006I1 QOOJ79
DATA
OIP16SS9200S6
001»
HOOtil 000310
DATA
01F16CS92006G
0020 ,
H00681 000381
DATA
01P166S920066
0018
H00681 ;, 000312"
DATA
0019
05/11/94
05/21/93
OOUS
02.2
05/11/9T
05/21/93
00166
02.2
05/11/94"
05/21/93
00166
02.2
OS/11/94
05/21/9J
001««
02.2
OUAWTALEX
HCB CAHP PKNOLETOH
QUAHTALEX"
HCB CAHP PENDLETOH
QUANTA
MCB CAMP PENDLETON
WANTALEX"
MCB CAHP PENDLETOH
•site ....... Lowtion ......
RECORD
WATER
VOC
ADMIN
VOC
RECORD^ HWER
VOC
«HIH RECORD
voc
QUANTALEX
MCB CAHP PEWCLETON
MOOS81D00384
DATA
OIFW6S920066
ooi a
QUANTALEJt
MCB CAMP PENOLETOH
QUAHTALEX
"CB CAMP PEHDLETOM
MOOS81
DATA
01F166S92DQS6
0012
«i/ll/94 OOANTALEX
"CO CAHP PENDLETON
MCH CAMP PENDLETON
-------
DATE • og/24/9t
COKTB/OU1D..NO..
M"r'"smTIVE
SUBJKT ......
H00681 000414
DATA
01F166S92C066
0028
MD06810004iS~
DATA
OIF166S920066
0022
M006»l000416
DATA
01F166S92006«
0022
- 000417
DATA
01P166S920066
0023
MOOm000411
DATA
01F166S920066
0020
M006I1000419"
DATA
01FU6S920066
0022
M006I1000472
DATA
01F166S920066
0012
05/11/94
05/21/93
00166
'02.2
05/1 l/9r
05/21/93
00166
02.2
05/11/94
05/21/93
00166
02.2
OS/11/94
OS/21/93
001CS
02.2
=05/11/94
05/21/93
OOU6
02.2
^QUANTALEX
MCB CAMP PENDLETON
QUAOTALBX~
CAMP PENDLETON
QUANTALEX"
KCB CAMP PENDLETOH
OUANTALEX
MCB CAMP PENDLBTON
QUANTALEX"
HCB CAMP PENDLETOM
LAB:
DATA VALIDATION REPORT FOR HCB CAMP PEHDLETOH'
S? ™uATER PW«ET«= SEMIVOLATILES
LAB: CH2M HILL SDOK 35471
ACMIN RECORD
ADHIM RECORD
KEY HORDS
HATER
SOLVENTS
MATER
SOLVENTS
• >.Sue. . .
PAUE -
.Location
DATA VALIOATIOH REPORT FOB
MATRIX, WATER PARAKETE8: S
LAB: CH2M HILL SOCK 3S470
CAMP PEMPLETOM '
™
ADMIH RECORDWATER"
SOLVEHTS
H006S1 000473
DATA "
01F166S920066
0014
MO0681000474
DATA
01F166S920066
0013
05/21/93
00166
02.2
05/12/94*
05/21/93
00166
02.2
~OS/lS/94
05/21/93
DQ16S
02.2
05/12/9T
05/21/93
00166
02.2
MCB CAMP PENDLETON
QUANTALEX
MCB CAMP PEKDLETOM
OUANTALEX
MCB CAMP PENDLETON
OUANTALEX
MCB CAMP PEMDLETOM
DATA VALIDATIOM REPORT FOR MCB CAMP
MATWX: HATER PAWHETER:
LAB; CH3M HILL SDG» 3S4S8
DATA VALIDATIOM REPORT FOR HCB CAMP PENDLETOM'
MAmx: WATER PARAMETER: SEHIVOLATaK
tAB: CH2M HILL SDO« 3S5JJ
VALIDATIOH REPORT TOR HCB CAMP PEHDLEToiT
=HTER P«*METER: s N
HILL SDO» 35540
ADMIN RECORD
AOMIH RECORD
HATER
SOLVENTS
HATER
SOLVENTS
: HATER PARAMETER: TPH DIESEL
: CH2H HILt SDG« 35502
ADMIH RECORO ~liATER"
SOLVENTS
ADMIN RECORD
TPH
REPORT MCB CAMP PENDLEToS~
: CH2M HILt, SDbl~3S12« '
ADMIN RECORD WATER"
TPH
WATER PARAMETER: TPH DIESEL
UU»< CH2H HILL SDO» 35337
ADMIN RECORD MATER
TPH
-------
BATE - 01/24/11
UIC HO. DOC.HO.
DOCUHEHT.TfPE...
CONTR/OUID. .NO. .
PRC.OME
DOC.DATE
CTO.NO..
AmOX.i.OF.PAGES CPA.CATf
FROM. "*
FROH.sicHATORE! '. '. ! '.'.
TO
TO.SICNATUBE. ..!.'!"
PEroLETOH
RECORD FILE INDEX (SORTED BY DOC. DATE)
SUBJECT.
KOOCI1 000476
DATA
01P166S920066
0013
05/12/94 QUAHTALEX
OS/21/93
00166 MCB CAMP PENDLETON
02.2
DATA VALIDATION REPORT MCB CAMP PENDLETON
MATRIX: HATER PARAMETER. TPH DIESEL
LAB: CH2H KILL SDG» 35377
DATA
01PU6S920066
0012
M00681000471
DATA
01F166S920066
0011
OS/21/93
00166 HC8 CAMP PENDLETON
02.2
05/12/94 QUANTALEX
OS/21/93
00166 MCB CAMP PENDLETOH
02.2
M00681 000479
DATA
01FK6S920066
0012
M00681
DATA
01F166S920066
0013
M00681000481
DATA
01P166S92006S
0012
OS/12/94QUANTALEX~
05/21/53
00166 HCB CAMP PEHDLETOW
02.2
OS/12/94 QUANTALEX
05/21/93
00166 MCB CAMP PENDLETON
02.2
M00581 000492
DATA
01FU6S920066
0012
M00681000413
DATA
01F166S920066
0012
OS/12/94QUANTALEX
05/21/93
00166 MCB CAMP PENDLETOM
02.2
OS/12/94QUAHTALEX
05/21/93
00166 MCB CAMP; PENDLETON
02:.2
H006BJ 000484
DATA
01FI66S»00<6
0013
05/12/94 QUAHTALEX
05/21/93
001S6 MCB CAMP PENDLETON
02.2
DATA VALIDATION REPORT HCB CAMP PENDLETON
MATRIX: HATER PARAMETER: TPH DIESEL
LAB: CH2M HILL SDG« 35379
DATA VALIDATION REPORT MCB CAMP PEHDLETON
MATRIX: WATER PARAMETER: TPH DIESEL
MB: CH2H HILL SDG» 34681
DATA VALIDATION REPORT HCB CAMP PENDLETON '
MATRIX: WATER PARAMETER: TPH DIESEL
LAB: CH2K HILL SDGB 3S520
DATA VALIDATION REPORT MCB CAMP PENDLETON
MATRIX: WATER PARAMETER: TPH DIESEL
LAB: CH2M HILL SDCK 3S531
DATA VALIDATION REPORT MCB CAMP PENDLETON
MATRIX: WATER PARAMETER: TPH GASOLINE
LAB: CH2H HILL SDO» 35502
DATA VALIDATION REPORT MCB CIWP PENDLETOH
MATRIX: WATER PARAMETER: TPH GASOLINE
LAB: CH2M HILL SDGH 35491
DATA VALIDATION REPORT MCB CAMP PENDLETON
MATRIX: WATER PARAMETER: TPH GASOLINE
LAB: CH2M HILL SDG» 35326
DATA VALIDATION REPORT MCB CAMP PENDLETOM
MATRIX: HATER PARAMETER: TPH GASOLINE
LAB: CH2M HILL SDGK 35337
DATA 05/21/93
03F166S920066 00166 HCS CAMP PENDLETON •
0013 - 02.2
DATA VALIDATION REPORT MCB CAMP PENDLETON
MATRIX: WATER PARAMETER: TPH GASOLINE
LAB: CH2M HILL SDG» 35377
CLASSIFICATION KEY H0.1DS
HATER
TPH
PAGE - iu
•Site Location
ADMIN RECORD
ADMIN RECORD HATER
TPH
ADMIN RECORD WATER
TPH
ADHIH RECORD
ADMIN RECORD
ADMIN RECORD
ADHIH RECORD
HATER
TPH
HATER
TPH
ADMIN RECORD HATER
TPH
HATER
TPH
WATER
TPH
ADMIN RECORD HATSR
TPH
ADMIN RECORD WATER
TPH
-------
DATE - 08/24/9b
UIC Wo. DOC. NO.
DOCUNENT.TYPE...
CONTR/CU1D..NO..
APPROX.fl. OF. PACES
HOOEI1 000487
DATA /
01F166S920066
0029
M00681 000488
DATA >;
01F166S920066
0030
DATA
01F166S920066
0027
M00661 000490
DATA
01F166S9ZOOS4
0034
H00661 000491
DATA
01F166S920066
0032
M006B1 000492
DATA
01F166S920066
0039
M006B1 000493
DATA
01F166S920066
.0030
H00681 000494
DATA
01F166S920066
0031
H00681 00049S
DATA
01F166S920066
0028
H006«l 000299
DATA
000000000000000
0677
PRC.DATE
DOC. DATE
CTO.MO..
EPA. CAT!
OS/12/94
OS/21/93
00166
02.2
05/12/94
05/21/93
00166
02.3
OS/12/94
05/21/93
001S6
02.2
05/12/94
OS/21/S3
00166
02.2
OS/12/94
OS/21/93
00166
02.2
05/12/94
05/21/93
00166
02.2
OS/12/94
05/21/93
00166
02.2
OS/12/94
05/21/93
00166
02.2
OS/12/94
OS/21/93
00166
02.2
OS/11/94
05/2G/93
00166
02.2
MCB CAMP
FROM, . . i
FROM. SIGNATURE
TO
TO. SIGNATURE
OUANTALEX
MCB CAMP PENDLETON
QUANTALEX
KC8 CAHP PEHDLETON
QUANTALEX
MCB CAMP PBNDLETON
GUANTALEX
MCB CAHP PEHbLETOH
OUANTALBX
MCB CAMP PENDLETON
QUANTALEX
MCB CAHP PENDLETON
QUANTALEX
MCB CAMP PENDLBTON
QUANTALEX
MCB CAHP PENDLETON
QUANTALEX
MCB CAHP PENDLETON
MESTCN MANAGERS
ROY F. HESTON
IT CORPORATION
PENDLETON ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD FILE^ INDEX (SORTED BY
SUBJECT
DATA VALIDATION REPORT HCB CAHP PEHDLETON
MATRIX: MATER PARAMETER! TCL METALS «\BORON. CYANAIDE
t MOLYBDENUM LAB: CH2H HILL SDGft 34337
DATA VALIDATION REPORT HCB CAHP PEHDLETON
MATRIX: MATER PARAMETER: TCL METALS H\BORON. CYANAIDE
d MOLYBDENUM LAB: CH2H HILL SDG» 35379
DATA VALIDATION REPORT KCB CAHP' PENDLETON
MATRIX; HATER PARAMETER: TCL METALS N\BORON. CYANAIDE
4 MOLYBDENUM LAB: CH2M HILL SDGfi 35107
DATA VALIDATION REPORT HCB CAMP PENDLETON
MATRIX: MATER PARAMETER: TCL METALS KXBORON, CYANAIDE
t MOLYBDENUM LAB: CH2H HILL SDQ« 35218
DATA VALIDATION REPORT MCB CAMP PENDLETON
MATRIX: MATER PARAMETER: TCL METALS MSBORON. CYANIDE
& MOLYBDENUM LAB: CH3M HILL SDGB 3S23S
DATA VALIDATION REPORT MCB CAHP PENDLETON
HATRIX: MATER PARAMETER: TCL METALS NXBORON. CYANIDE
( MOLYBDENUM LAB: CH2M HILL SDGt 35251
DATA VALIDATION REPORT MCB CAMP PENDLETON
HATRIX: HATER PARAMETER: TCL METALS H\BORON. CYANIDE
t MOLYBDENUM LAB, CH2M HILL SOCO 35326
DATA VALIDATION REPORT MCB CAMP PENDLETON
HATRIX: WATER PARAMETER: TCL METALS HVBORON, CYANIDE
i MOLYBDENUM LAB: CH2H HILL SDGS 35337
DATA VALIDATION REPORT MCB CAMP PENDLETON
HATRIX: MATER PARAMETER: TCL METALS H\BORON, CYANIDE
t MOLYBDENUM LAB: CH2M HILL SDOK 35352
LABORATORY REPORT FOR IT CORP. CLP\SEHIVOLATILES
ANALYSIS SDGI H2773 RPM8 9304S6B7. 930SS700*
DOC. DATE)
CLASSIFICATION
ADMIN RECORD
ADMIN RECORD
ADMIN RECORD
ADMIN RECORD
ADMIN RECORD
ADMIN RECORD
ADMIN RECORD
ADMIN RECORD
ADMIN RECORD
ADMIN RECORD
MATER
METALS
HATER
METALS
HATER
METALS
HATER
METALS
CYANIDE
MATER
METALS
CYANIDE
HATER
METALS
CYANIDE
HATER
METALS
CYANIDE
HATER
METALS
CYANIDE
HATER
METALS
CYANIDE
SOLVENTS SOOTHHEST DIVISIOH
-------
DATE - 01/24/JI
UIC No. DOC.HO. PRC.DATB
KXMOT.TYPE... DOC,DAT£
COWR/CUID. .HO.. CTO.NO
APPXOX.I.OP.PAGES EPA.CATB
PHOH H^.™P PamtSm» "MNBIWTIVB RECORD TILE IHDEX (SORTED
FROH.SIGNATURr.
SUBJECT
...
TO
TO.SXGHATURE..'.'.'.'.
M006I1 OOOJOO 05/11/34
DATA 05/27/93
000000000000000 00166
0237 02.2
HESTON MANAGERS
ROY P. HESTON
IT CORPORATION
FORIT CORP-
dOC. DATE)
. CLASSIFICATION H>r WORDS
•.•••»•••••.._
......•••«•••....,
RECORD HPCDD
PACE .
Location
SOUTHWEST DIVISION
HO 0611
DATA
01FI66S9200«6
0019
QtWOTALEX ^I?.™.1?*"0" «EPORT FOR «CB CAMP
HCB CAMP PENDLETOM
,05/28/93
OOUS
02.2
iOUTHHEST DIVISION
OS/27/94
06/01/93
00166
,02.2
HESTOH MANAGERS
IT CORPORATION
ADMIN RECORDVOALTILES
05/27/S4
06/02/93
00166
02.2
KESTON MANAGERS
IT CORPORATION
MORATORY REPORT FOR HCB CAMP PENDLETON
05/27/94
OS/02/93
00166
02.2
HESTOH MANAGERS
IT CORPORATION
05/27/94
06/02/93
00166
02.2
HESTOH MANAGERS
IT CORPORATION
LABORATORY REPORT FOB MCB CAMP PEtTOLETOH
"
ADMN RECORD DATA
002332
M00681
DATA
000000000000000
0019
07/21/94
06/02/93
001(6
02.2
CH2M HILt MATRIX: WATER
HCB CAMP PENDLETON 'STSSl SEHIV°"TILES
ADMIN RECORD
HATER
SEMIVOLATILES
M00681
DATA
01F166S920066
0012 :.'
M00681 002488
DATA
01F166S9200S6
0012
0>/lO/«4
06/02/93
00166
02.2
08/10/94
06/02/93
00166
02.2
OUANTLEX
HCB CAMP PENDLETON SDOl"^^
QUANTLBX
HCB CAMP PENDLETON SDGS^M
SOUTHWEST DIVISION
SOUTHWEST DIVISION
-------
DATE - OB/24/9B
UIC (to. DOC.NO.
DOCUMENT. TVPE. . .
CONTR/CUID. .NO. .
APPROX.»A)F.PAGE
DATA '•
01F166S92D066
0012 [
MOOSil 002490
DATA
01FH6S92bO«6
0012
Soosii 00201
DATA
01F166S92D066
0012
DATA .
01F166S920066
0012
DATA
01F166S920066
001} :
HOD681 002494
DATA
01F16SS920066
001}
HOOS81 002495
DATA
01F1«6S9200(C
0011
N006I1 002496
DATA
01F166S920066
0044
M00681 002497
DATA
01F166S920066
0011
DATA
01F166S920066
0012 .;
HCB CT
PRC.DATE FROM..'.
DOC. DATE FROM. SIGNATURE. . .
'CTO.NO.. TO
S EPA.CATi TO. SIGNATURE
01/10/9* QUANTLEX
OS/02/93
00166 HCB CAMP PENDLETOH
02.2
;06/02/93 ,
"001«6 MCB CAMP PENDLETOH
I02-2
04/02/93
00166 MCB CAMP PEMDLETOH
02.3
08/10/94 QUAHTLEX
06/02/93
00166 MCB CAMP PENDLETON
02.2
OB/10/J4 GUANTLEX
06/02/93
0016S HCB CAMP PENDLETON
02,2
06/02/93
001 6 6 MCB CAMP PEMDLETOH
02.2
06/02/93
OOUS MCB CAMP PENDLETOH
02.2
06/02/93
00166 MCB CAMP PENDLETOH
02.2
06/10/94 OUAKTLEX ~~~
06/02/93
00166 HCB CAMP PENDLETON
02.2
06/02/93
00166 MCB CAMP PBNDLETON
02.2
«P PENDLETON ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD FILE INDEX (SORTED BY
SUBJECT
MCB CAMP PENLBTOM DATA VALIDATION REPORT
MATRIX: WATER PARAMETER: TPH GASOLINE LAB: CH2M HILL
MCB CAMP PENLETON DATA VALIDATION REPORT
MATRIX: MATER PARAMETER: TPH GASOLINE LAB: CH2M HILL
SDQK 35078
HCB CAMP PENDLETON DATA VALIDATION REPORT
MATRIX: HATER PARAMETER, TPH GASOLINE LAB: CH2H HILL
MCB CAMP PENDLETON DATA VALIDATION REPORT ' ~
MATRIX: WATER PARAMETER: TPH GASOLINE LAB: CH2M HILL
MCB CAMP PENDLETON DATA VALIDATION REPORT
HATRM: WATER PARAMETER: TPH GASOLINE LAB, CH2M HILL
SDGa) 35470
MCB CAMP PENDLETON DATA VALIDATION REPORT ~
StWI(I:iS«l""'ER WWAMmR: TPH °*S°MKE 1AB: CH2M HILL
HCB CANP PENDLETON DATA VALIDATION REPORT ! ~
PARAMETER: ORGANOINTROGEN PESTICIDE LAB-ESE
SDG» G275S7.G275»1,G27«64. 027718
HCB CAHP PEHDLBTON DATA VALIDATION REPORT
PARAMETER: CARBAHATE\DREA PESTICIDE LAfl-ESE
SDG» 027393. G27423.G27468.G27593
MCB CAMP PENDLETON DATA VALIDATION REPORT
SDoJ'aSs"*™ WUWETER! TPH DIESEL "•' OiZH HILL
m.a OIBP PENDLETON DATA VALIDATION REPORT
SDO» 3S352TER P*MMETEB: TPH DIESEL "»• CH2« "I"-
DOC. DATE)
. CLASSIFICATION
ADMIN RECORD
ADMIN RECORD
ADMIN RECORD
ACMIN RECORD
ADMIN RECORD
ADMIN RECORD
ADMIN RECORD
ADMIN RECORD
ADMIN RECORD
ADMIN RECORD
KEY WORDS
WATER
TPH
DATA
HATER
TPH
DATA
WATER
TPH
DATA
WATER
TPH
DATA
WATER
TPH
DATA
WATER
TPH
DATA
PESTICIDES
WATER
DATA
PESTICIDES
DATA
HATER
DATA
TPH
HATER
DATA
TPH
PACE
SOUTHWEST DIVISION
SOUTHWEST DIVISION
SOUTHWEST DIVISION
SOUTHWEST DIVISION
SWTHHEST DIVISION
SOUTHWEST DIVISION
SOUTHWEST DIVISION
SOUTHWEST DIVISION
SOUTHWEST DIVIISON
" SOUTHWEST DIVISION
-------
DATE - 0«/2«/)|
P*C'DATE «"»
MPROX.i.OF.PACSS EPA.CAT» ' ' '' ' '
KNDUIDN ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD MtB IHOEX (swnQ „ ^ ^
SUBJECT
CLASSIFICATION KEYWORDS
!•••____ IftT^ttf
PACE
KOOfili 002499
DATA
01F166SS20066
0012
01/10/9*
0
HCB CAMP PEHDLETOM
S.WTHMEST DIVISION
M00681 002501
DATA
01F166S920066
0013
QUANTLEX
HCB CANP PEHDLBTOH
06/02/93
00166
02.2
DATA VALIDATION REPORT —.„.„
PARAMETER: TPH DIESEL LAB:CH2N HHL RECORD
SOUTHHEST DI VISION
M00681 002S02
DATA
01F166S920066
0012
8/10/94
OS/02/93
0016S
D2.2
OUANTLEX
CAMP PENDIETON
HCB CAMP PENDLETON DATA VALIDATION REPORT
PMWETER! ™D™
MJUTHHEST DIVISION
HOOSei 002503
DATA
01F16SS920066
0013
08/10/94
,06/02/93
001C6
02.2
QUAHTLEX
»CB CAMP PENDLfiTON
MCB CAMP PEMDLBTOH DATA
PARAMETER:
SOUTHWEST DIVISION
H00681 002504
DATA
01F1S6S920066
0012
OB/10/J4
Cfi/02/93
00166
02.2
V«-I"ATIO« REPORT
PARAMETER: TPH DIESEL LAB.. CH2M HILL
WCB CAMP PENDLBTOH
M00681 002505
DATA
01M6SS920066
0013
08/10/94
06/02/93
00166
02.2
CAMP PENDLETOH DATA VALIDATION REW1BT —
,*. U,™ ... TPH S"™ ,E"W^,^ „ ADMIN-RECORD
MCB CAMP PENDLETON
SOimWEST DIVISION
M006U 001293
DATA
05/27/94
OS/03/93
00166
02.2
HESTON MAHAGERS
IT CORPORATIOM
LABORATORY REPORT FOR MCB CAMP
M006JI 001297
DATA
OS/21/94
OS/07/93
00166
02.2
HESTON MANAGERS
IT CORPORATION
H00681 001296
DATA
05/27/94
06/07/93
00166
02.2
WESTOH HAHAGERS
IT CORPORATIOM
LABORATORY REPORT FOR MCH CAMP
ADMIH RECORD"SEMIVOLATILE
-------
DATE - 08/24/94 !
oic NO. . DOC.NO. PRC.OATE FROM • ** CWf> PEHDLETOM ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD FILE INDEX (SORTED BY DOC. DATE)
DOCUMENT;.TYPE...' DOC.DATE FROM.SIGNATURE!'.'.'.'.'. \
COHTR/CUID. .NO. . .CTO.NO.. TO
APPROX.r.OF.PAGES EPA.CAT* To!siGNATURE
SUBJECT
KEYHORDS
PACE - llg
...Sue
H00681
DATA
OS02
HOOCS1
DATA
0453
M00661
DATA
H00681
DATA
0150
M006S1
DATA
0216
001300 05/27/94 HESTON MANAGERS
•\ OS/07/93 : .
! 00166 IT CORPORATION
02.2
'001294 05/27/94 HESTON MANAGERS
06/08/93
00166 IT CORPORATION
02.2
00129S OS/27/94 MESTOH MANAGERS
1 06/08/93
; 00146 IT CORPORATION
(02.2
001296 .OS/27/94 HESTON MANAGERS'
| ;06/08/93
i '00166 IT CORPORATION
02.2
00129905/27/94 HESTON MANAGERS
•06/08/93 ,
00166 IT CORPORATION
02.2
MOOm Oflil2S05/25/94 CH2M HILL
DOTA 06/10/93 PEGGY A. NORTON
35781 IT CORPORATION
Moi 02.2 DAVE ,MARK
LABORATORY REPORT FOR MCB CAMP PENDLETON
CLP GCMS VOLATILES ANALYSIS SDG« W2773
9304S«87,9305S700 ; ,
„„„, RECOBn
RECORD
LABORATORY REPORT FOR MCB CAMP PENDLETON
InLf0*8 VOLATIU! ANALYSIS SDO» H2836 RFWK 930SS820
9305S828, 9305S842.9305S851.930SS85B.9305S866
LABORATORY REPOttT FOR HCB CAMP PBNDLETON
HERBICIDES ANALYSIS SDG» H2792 RFH» 930SS7S3
LABORATORY REPORT FOR MCB CAMP PEHDLBTOSi"
TOTAL tXTRACTABLE HYDROCARBONS ANALYSIS SDGI WS81B
;RFHd 930SS775,9305S767,930SS798.930SSS04.930SSI12
ANALYTICAL DATA FOR MCB CAMP PENDLETON
PESTICIMS-
VOLATILES
VOLATILES
«006B100112S05/2S/94 CH2M HILL~
DW* 06/10/93 PEGGY A. NORTON
35848 IT CORPORATION
021S 02.2 DAVE MURK
ANALYTICAL DATA FOR MCB CAMP PENOLETON
VOLATILES, SBHIl/OLATILES. PESTICIDES. PCB.
METALS
R
HERBICIDES
METALS
VOLATILBS
SEMIVOALTILES
VOLATILES
SEMI VOLATILES
PESTICIDES
H006H1 001231 05/27/94 NESTON MANAGERS
DATA 06/10/93
0016S IT CORPORATION
0821 02.2
00'248OS/27/94 HESTON MANAGERS^
DATA 06/10/93
00166 IT CORPORATION
0364 02.2
^!£1.V.t!«.^'Wr f°* «« CAMP PENDLETON
MCB CAMP
CLP ORGANOCHWRINE PESTICIDES ANALYSIS SDGK H2773 \
RF»» 9304S687.9304S700
ADMIN RErQBri
ALWIH KbCURD
PCB
HETALS
SEHIVOLATILES
PESTICIDES
-------
DATE - Of/24/31
Ho. DOC.HO. PRC.DATE FROM
HCB
A»aHISTRAT,VE RECORD F.LE 1HDEX (SORTH)
B* DOC. DATE)
- 120
HOOSII
DATA
0492
H006IT
DATA
03J7
03S7
001274
~0012lT
^01236"
05/27/94
06/10/93
00166
02.2
05/27/94
OS/11/93
ooice
02.2
1)5/27/94
06/11/93
00166
02.2
HESTOH MANAGERS
IT CORPORATION
HESTOH MANAGERS
IT CORPORATION
•IESTON MANAGERS
IT CORPORATION
SUBJECT....
"•~~™:::::::::..!T:.?r ""•
7Wt»V tt***i»n_ ^ "***"'l**""«»i««»i««»-1
•«••••».„„
•slte ....... Location ......
l^Msssi^r
ADMIN RECORD
RECORD
*DH1N
VOUTI1ES
HERfllCIoF
PEST1CIDES-
WESTON HANAGERS
IT CORPORATION
NBSTOH MANAQER
IT CORPORATION
DATA
0252
M00631
DATA
05<3
"aaizjs
OS/27/94
06/15/93
00166
02.2
.05/27/94
;06/15/93
OOU6
02.2
KANAOERS
IT CORPORATION
"MH8TOH MAHAOBRS
IT CORPORATION
'SS^^InSg"" F°" "g" ^^ PH'DLETON :
•ZSttS^^
TPH
VOUkTILES
too
HETALS
CYANIDE
H006I1"
DATA
0160
H006S1
DATA
03S6
0.012S3
05/27/94
0.6/16/93
00166
02.2
"OS/27/94
06/17/93
00166
02.2
WNAOERS
IT CORPORATION
"NESTON MANAGER'S"
IT CORPORATIOB
ADNIN RECORD
PESTICIDET
-------
BB/TO/OI
-------
DATE - 08/34/JI
UIC Ko. DOC.NO. PRC.DATB FROM ^..^ PEM>LmH ^""STRATIVE RECORD FILE INDEX (SORTED BY DOC. DATE,
PACE - 122
DOCOHENT.TYPE... DOC.DATE FROM.SIGNATURE
CONTR/CUID. .HO.. CTO.HO.. TO...
. APPROX.K.OF.PAGES EPA.CATI TO-SIGNATURs!.'!'. '.'.'. '
CLASSIFICATION KEY WORDS
• Site Location
H00611
DATA
0101
0273
0391
H00«81
DATA
0332
001251 05/27/94 NESTON MANAGERS
06/21/93
00166 IT CORPORATION
02.2
001253 05/27/94 HESTON MANAGERS
06/21/93
061(6 IT CORPORATION
02.2
001Z54OS/27/94 MESTOK MANAGERS
06/21/93
00166 IT CORPORATION
02.2
00126205/27/94HESTON MANAGERS
06/22/93
00166 IT CORPORATION
02.2
Hooen
DATA
0191
M00681
DATA
0608
001264 OS/27/94 HBSTON MANAGERS
06/22/93
00166 IT CORPORATION
02.2
000920 OS/18/941 HESTON MANAGERS
06/23/93
00166 IT CORPORATION
02.2
M006B100092105/18/94 HESTON MANAGERS
DATA 06/23/93
00166 IT CORPORATION
0464 02.2
M00681OOOJ2705/18/94 HESTON MANAGERS"
DATA 06/23/93
00166 IT CORPORATION
0522 02.2
LABORATORY REPORT FOR MCB CAMP PENDLETON
VOLATILE PETROIEUM HYDROCARBONS ANALYSIS SOON M2B58
RFHII 930SS843.9305S8S2.9305SI57
ADMIM RE««n
VOLATILES
LABORATORY REPORT FOR HCB CAMP PENDLnwT
LABORATORY REPORT FOR MCB CAMP PENDLBTON
CLP INORGANIC METALS ANALYSIS SDG» H2818
RFWIf 9305S775.930SS787.9305S798.930SS804, 9305S812
linfmi nrrnnrl
""
^
RFKH 93D5S775. 930SS787, 9305S79I. 9305S804 . 9305SI12
LABORATORY I
CLP/OC/MS i
RFH« 930SSt77,9305S878,930SS891
""" RECORD
RF«» 93065051,93063058, 9306S059. 930SS060. 930SS068
RFWK 9305S»79. 9J05S889. 930SS902, 9305S904
DATA
0269
M006I1
DATA
06/23/93
00166
02.2
001272 05/27/94
06/23/93
UPC-1VMJ Mm
IT CORPORATION
LABORATORY REPORT FOR MCB CAMP PENDLETON ;
VOLATILE PBTHOLEUH HYDROCARBONS ANALYSIS SDCI M2890
RFH« 930SSm.9305S878.9305S8Sl
LABORATORY REPORT FOR MCB CAMP PENDLETON «
UWIN RECORD
IDMIM RECORD
VOLATILES "
VOLATILES
0395
00166 IT CORPORATION
02. Z
S306S05J.93065059.9306S060,9306S06B
-------
DATE - 08/24/99
MCB CAMP PENDLETON ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD FILE 'INDEX [SORTED BY DOC. DATE)
PAGE - UJ
UIC HO. DOC. NO.
DOCUMENT. TYPE. , .
CONTR/GUID. .NO..
APPRO*. 1. OF. PAGES
H00681
DATA
0337
M006M
DATA
0350
N00641
DATA
0310
M00681
DATA
0517
M00681
DATA
0234
H00681
DATA
0360
N00681
DATA
0084
H00681
DATA
0112
M00681
DATA
0224
M00681
DATA
000913
1
000916
000917
000907
000914
00091S
00091*
000919
000928
000929
PRC.DATE
DOC. DATE
CTO.NO. .
EPA. CAT*
OS/18/94
06/35/93
00166
02.2
OS/18/94
06/25/93
00166
02.2
I
OS/18/94
06/25/93
00166
02.3
05/18/94
06/28/93
00166
02.2
'" i
05/18/94
06/28/93
00166
02.2
05/18/94
06/28/93
00166
02.2
05/18/94
06/28/93
00166
02.2
05/18/94
06/28/93
00166
02:2
os/ia/94
06/28/93
00166
02.2
OS/18/94
06/28/93
FROM •
FROM SIGNATURE
TO
i
HESTON MANAGERS
IT CORPORATION '
HESTON MANAGERS
IT CORPORATION
HESTOH MANAGERS
IT CORPORATION
HESTON MANAGERS
IT CORPORATION
HESTON KANAGERS
IT CORPORATION
HESTON MANAGERS
IT CORPORATION
HESTON KANAGERS
IT CORPORATION
HESTON MANAGERS
IT CORPORATION
NESTON MANAGERS
IT CORPORATION
NESTON MANAGERS
SUBJECT
LABORATORY REPORT FOR MCB CAMP PENDLETOH
CLP INORGANIC METALS ANALYSIS SDGK HJ9S6
RFHB 9305SB20,9305S82t.9305SS42.9305S85l. 9305S858 .
LABORATORY REPORT FOR MCB CAMP PENDLETOH
INORGANIC MET CHEMISTRY ANALYSIS !
SOCK H2I36 RFHS 930SS920.930SS929, 930SS842. 930SS8S1
LABORATORY REPORT FOR MCB CAMP PENDLETON
VOLATILE PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS ANALYSIS
SDGK N2905 RFM 9305S879.930SS889, 9305S902. 930SS904
LABORATORY REPORT FOR MCB CAMP PENDLETON
CLP/GC/MS SEMI VOLATILE ANALYSIS :
SDG8 U2926 RFHt 9306S011, 9306^024 , 9306S030, 93065037
• i ; /. .
LABORATORY REPORT FOR HCB CAMP PENDLETON
' *OA ;
RFHS 9306S224, .
LABORATORY REPORT FOR MCB CAMP PBNDLETON
SEMIVOLATILES
RFHI 9306S224
LABORATORY REPORT FOR MCB CAMP PENDLETON
VOLATILES
RFHS 9306S224
LABORATORY REPORT FOR MCB CAMP PENDLETON
DIESEL FUEL
RFHI 9306S224
LABORATORY REPORT FOR MCB CAMP PENOLITON
PESTICIDES PCBs
RFUH 9306S224
LABORATOfiY REPORT FOR MCB CAMP PENDLETON
HATER SOIL HBOX
CLASSIFICATION KEY WORDS Site Location
ADMIN RECORD METALS
100
ADMIN RECORD IOC "
ADMIN RECORD VOLATILE
f-
ADMIN RECORD SEMIVOLATILES
ADMIN RECORD VOA
ADMIN RECORD SEMIVOLATZLES
ADMIN RECORD VOLATILES
ADMIN RECORD DIESEL FUEL
ADMIN RECORD PESTICIDES
PCB
ADMIN RECORD HATER
0223
00166 IT CORPORATION
02.3
RFWK 9306S224
-------
HCB
DATE - 01/24/91
UIC Ho. DOC.NO. PRC.DATB FROM
MCWENTTYPE... DOC.DATE PRCH.'sreNATURB;
CONTR/GU1D. .NO.. CTO.NO.. TO
APPROX.H.OF.PAGES EPA.CATS TO.sicNATUflE;;.'
KOOCtl
DATA
D255
000910
05/18/91
OS/29/93
OOU6
02.2
HESTDH MANAGERS
IT CORPORATIOH
CAMP KHDUmi AW11HISTRATIVE RECORD FILE 1HDEX .SOWED BY DOC. DATE)
CLASSIFICATION
LABORATORY REPORT FOR HCB CAHP
VOLATILE PEIROLEOH
SDOI «926
W*»»JOISOU.9306Sffl24,9JfliS030.9J06S037.MO«!wJ
LABORATORY REPORT FOR MCB CAHP PEHDLBTWT
KEY WORDS
VOLAT1LES
PACE .
Location ......
OS/1B/94
06/29/93
001«6
02.2
HESTOH MANAGERS
IT CORPORATION
05/18/94
06/29/93
00166
02.2
MESTOH MANAGERS
IT CORPORATION
LABORATORY REPORT FOR MCB CAHP
OS/1S/94
BS/30/93
001S6
02.2
WSTON HAHAGERS
IT CORPORATION
05/18/94
06/30/93
00166
02.2
HESTON MANAGERS
IT CORPORATIOH
LABORATORY REPORT fun HCB CAMP PEHDLBTON
OS/11/94
06/30/S3
001«<
02.2
NESTON MANAGERS
IT CORPORATION
"0SS879.9305S,8,,
05/18/94
06/30/93
00166
02.2
HESTON MANAGERS
IT CORPORATION
LABORATORY REPORT FOR MCB CAMP
««««» AN
9306S024.9306S030.9306S037.9306S044
HESTON MANAGERS
DIESEL FUELREP°RT FW "* «•'««««•
H2926 RFNX 99306S2S*
05/11/94 WESTON MANAGERS
07/01/93
00166 IT CORPORATIOH
92:2
«"•««» REPOW »OH HCB CAMP PENDLETOH
-------
DATE -| 08/24/98
UIC No. DOC.NOv PRC.DATE
FROM
APPROX-..OF.PAGES EPA.CAT*
M00681
DATA
0160
000911 05/11/94
07/01/93
• OOKS
•' 02.2
HCB CAMP PENDLETOH ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD FILE INDEX .SORTED BY DOC.. DATE,
SUBJECT ...
CLASSIFICATION
" "- ""-•• •
PAGE . 125
KEY WORDS
•site Location
HESTON MANAGERS
IT CORPORATION
RFH« 9306S258
ADMIN RECORD KXJ
»ESTO» MANAGERS
IT CORPORATION
000930 OS/18/94
07/01/93
.00166
i02.2
HESTOH MAKAGESS
IT CORPORATION
000931 ,V OS/18/94
' -07/01/93
': .00166
02.2
MANAGERS
IT CORPORATION
RFWS 9306S258
LABORATORir HKPORT FOR MCB CAMP
P5/X8/9,
07/01/9J
00166
02.2
MANAGERS
IT CORPORATION
05/18/94
07/01/93
, 00166
.02.2
HESTON MAMAGERS
IT CORPORATION
LABORATORY REPORT FOR MCB CAMP PENDLETOH
000941 OS/18/94
i07/01/93
,00166
.02.2
E'STON MANAGERS
IT CORPORATION
WBOMTORY REPORT FOR MCB CAMP
OS/18/S4
07/02/93
00166
02.2
BESTON MANAGERS
IT CORPORATION
.9306S07..9306S079.9306S080
OS/18/94
07/02/93
00166
02.2
HESTON MANAGERS
IT CORPORATION
SB«""«'«.«"KI«!S. PCB
TFH
VOLATILES
SEHIVOLATILES
PESTICIDES
PCB
HERBICIDE
-------
DATt - OI/24/9»
UIC Ho. DOC.NO. FRC.OATE
DOCUffiNT.TYPE... DOC.DATE
CONTR/GUID..NO.. CIO.NO..
APPROX.I.OF.PAGES EPA.CATS
05/18/94
07/06/93
001(6
02.2
05/18/94
07/06/93
00166
02.2
mom 000922
DATA
0227
0119
H00681
DATA
0428
000924
,05/18/94
01/06/93
001(6
02.2
HOI
FROM
FROM.SIGNATURE..,
TO
TO.SIGKATURE
HESTON MANAGERS
IT CORPORATION
HESTON MANAGERS
IT CORPORATION
HESTON MANAGERS
IT CORPORATION
CAHP PEHDLETON ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD FILE 1HDEX ISORTED BY DOC. DATE)
.':: SUBJECT CLASSIFICATION
LABORATORY REPORT FOR HCB CAMP PENDLETON
TOTAL PURCEABLE PETROLEUM ANALYSIS SDGI H2945
RFWI 9306S501. 9306SOSB. 930SS059. 9306S060. 9306S06I
ADHIN RECORD
KEY HORDS
TPH
PACE
•Sue Location
LABORATORY REPORT FOR HCB CAHP PENDLEToiT
ANALYSIS SDGI H29«S
>J06SS01,9306SOS8.930SS059,930«S060.930(S06I
LABORATORV REPORT FOR HCB CAHP PENDLETON
OCHS VOLATILES ANALYSIS SDG» H2984 RFH« 9306S103
RFHI 9306SJJ9. 9306S120. 9306S13S. 930(S13S. 9306S137
VOLATILES
LABORATORY REPORT FOR MCB
" "°«051.9306SOSO
LABORATORY REPORT FOB HCB CAMP PENDLEToi
ORCaUTOCHLORINB PESTICIDES ANALYSIS SDG» »45
RFIIK 930SS05l.»30SSOS«.930SS6S9
05/27/94
07/06/93
001«6
02.2
LABORATORY REPORT FOR MCft CAMP PENDLBTON
ANALYSIS SDGI 29CO
9306S070.9306S07B.9306S079.9306SOeO
05/27/94
07/OS/93
00166
02.2
LABORATORY REPORT FOR HCB CAMP PENDLETON
"06S051.9306SOS8
9306S060.930«S06a
M006B1
DATA
OOOOOOOOOQOOOOD
0409
OS/27/94
07/06/93
00166
02.2
HESTON MANAGERS
It CORPORATION
R!««T •« » CANP PENDLETON
SOUTHHEST DIVISION
9306S181.9306S1B2.9306S192,9306S205
LABORATORY REPORT FOR HCB CAMP PENDLETON
05/26/91
07/07/93
0016S
02.2
PENDLETON
9306S078.S306S079,930SS91,9306S102
-------
DATE - 08/24/98V--
uic NO. Doc.do. PRC.CATE 'FROM,; >Ka
BOCWENT.TYPE. . . DOC. DATE FROM. SIGNATURE
CONTR/OUID. .NO. . CTO.NO.. TO '
MOOS81 001202 05/27/94 HESTON MANAGERS
DATA i 07/08/93
' =00166 IT CORPORATION
0265 02.2
M00«« 001200 .05/27/94 HESTON MANAGERS "
DATA 07/1J/93
000000000000000 00166 IT CORPORATION
0249 ,02.2
hC06«l 001204 05/27/94 WESTON MANAGERS
D*™ 07/12/93
°01«« IT CORPORATION
0073 .02.2
»°°*»» D0130S 05/27/94 tieSTON MANAGERS
WTA 07/12/93
„„„, 00t«< IT CORPORATIOH
0203 02.2
MOOSB1 001207 05/27/94 (JESTON MANAGEBs"
DATA 107/12/93
00166 IT CORPORATION
015* 02.2
DAT* 07/13/93 PEGGY A. NORTON
15967 iOOU6 IT CORPORATION
0232 02.2 DAVE HARK
M006B1 OOUS4 05/25/94 CH2M HILL "" ~
DAT* 07/13/93 PEGGY A. NORTON
35926 00166 IT CORPORATION
0242 02.2 DAVE MARK
DATA 07/13/93 PEGGY A. NORTON
15914 00166 IT CORPORATION
03»<> 02. J DAVE MARK
CAMP PENDLETON ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD FILE INDEX (SORTED BV DOC DATE)
• SUBJECT • -. .-«,„.„
,* ' CLASSIFICATION
..•••...•••••a..... ....UK
*"™ — ""•.'••..*»...•«»......
*••"*••«"»*•»»»••*»*.«
^LABORATORY REPORT TOR MCB CAMP PENDLETON . »,«,„ o.™
i IINOROANICS MET CHEMISTRY SDG» W29SO RF«» 9306S067 *K°*°
,93063070. 93fl«S070.9306S079.930«S080,9306S09l,9306S102
, LABORATORY REPORT FOR MCB CAMP PENDLETON ~ ,•„
, HERBICIDES ANALYSIS SDOU H2984 RFH«: 930SS103,
1 !
INORGANIC RFHI 9304S147 C*M'> PENDLETON *»«» RECORD
VOLATILE PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONSPWALYSIS SDGK W29B4 "*"" *KC°*D
RFtJB 930W103.9306SU9.9306S120.9306S13S.9306S136
LABORATORY REPORT FOR MCB CAMP PENDLETON : ADMIN REroSri
WH»°930M103*)I"NE PESTICIDES W^WSIS SDG» H2984
ftjJAUfTICAL DATA FOR MCB CAMP PENDLETON AEHIH RECORO
VOLATII.ES, SEMIVOLATILES. PESTICIDES. PCB.. TFH,
,'i!!?i'IrtCAl' U*'A KOR ""* CAHP PENDLETON ACMIH BPfYlBn
VOLATItES. SEHIVOLAT1LES. TFH. PESTICIDES. PCS, R°
HETA1*S *
ANALYTICAL DATA FOR MCB CAMP PENDLETON APMIN BEm.fi
METALS1*5' SD"VOtATILES- w«. PESTICIDES. PCBs..
^ PAGE
KEYWORDS ...Site Location
100
SOUTHWEST DIVISION
IDS ~ - —
VOLATILES
VOALTILES '"• —
SEMIVOALTILES
PESTICIDES
PCB
TFH
METALS
VOALTILES ' •
SEMIVOLATILES
TFH
PESTICIDES
PCB
METALS
VOLATILES ~ —
SEMIVOLATILES
TFH
PESTICIDES
PCB
HERBICIDE
-------
DATE - 01/24/31
!"£^DOCiKO- '«C-O«E .„„,
™S:: STC «"•«"««:
APPRO*.| OF.PACES EPA.CATI
P£™-E™ «"'«'smTiVE RECORD F,u
.SORTED Br DOC DATE,
'
PACE
HOOCH
DATA
3SJ45
027J
001158
DATA
35901
0297
H00681
DATA
3S934
0380
H00681
DATA
35966
0960
OS/2S/94
07/13/93
001(6
02.2
05/25/94
07/13/93
00166
02.2
CH2MIIILL
PEOQY A. HORTOH
IT CORPORATIOH
DAVE HARK
ttHJmtEs. SE«wo^T?Ss!:*?mfES?DEs. PCB..
KEY HORDS
RECORD VOLATILES
SEHIVOLATILES
TFH
•Site...
.Location.
CH2H HILL
PEOClf A. NORTON
IT CORPORATION
DAVE MARK
001160
05/35/94 CH2M HILL"
07/13/91 PEGGY A. KORTOH
0016S IT CORPORATIOH
02.2 DAVE; HARK
05/25/94 CHJH HILL"
07/13/93 PEOOY A. MORTON
00166 IT CORPORATION
02.2 DAVE HARK
ANALYTICAL DATA FOR HCB CAHP
™ A
VOLAT1LES~
SEH1VOMTILES
TFH
PESTICIDES
PCS
HETALS
. PCS..
VOIJITILES
SEMIVOLATILES
TFH
SEMIVOtATILES. PESTICIDES; PCBa
.TILES
SEMIVOLATILES
PESTICIDES
LABORATORY REPORT TOR
HESTON MANAGERS
IT CORPORATIOM
REPORT FOR HC8 CAHP PEMDLETOH
RECORD VOLATILES
05/27/94
07/13/93
00166
02.2
NESTOH MANAGERS
IT CORPORATION
LABORATORY REPORT FOR BCB CAHP
HBSTON MANAGERS
IT CORPORATION
LABORATORY REPORT FOR
-------
DATE • 01/24/91 •
UIC Ho. DOC.NO. PRC.DATE FROM
DOCUMENT.TYPE. .. DOC.DATE FR(
CONTH/CU1D..NO.. CTO HO TO
APPROX.I.OF.PACES EPA.CATI To'siGNATURE'
M004M 001177 05>2S/94 CH3H HILL
?„* 07/M/9J PEGGY A.-NORTON
III? 0(»«« IT CORPORATION
°'" Oi-2 DAVE MARK ...
' CAMP PENDLETON^NISTRATWB RECORD riLE;i«BEX (SORTED « DOC. DATE,
i ••••' SUBJECT ;;.. „
•••• ! ' CLASSIFICATION KEYWORDS
*•»*••»••»••••••«» ";
"•" "" "
...Sue.
PACE -
.U>c«(.ion
°*T* *'OR IKa CAMI> H
, SEMIVOLATILES. PESTICIDESrPCB.
ADMIN RECORD
VOLATILES
SEMIVOLAT1LES
PESTICIDIES
05/25/94 CH2M HILl
PEGGY A. NORTON
OOltt IT CORPORATION
»2.2 DAVK MARK
JWU.YTICAI. DATA FOR HCB
VOLATILES
CKMI VOLATILES
PESTICIDES
MESTOM HAHAGERS
IT CORPORATION
RSK.MI Ml MUI CAMP PWDUtTOH
LABORATORY REPORT FOR HCB CAHP
IWROANIC8 METALS
Ste"!!!..!!»"nr ro« •» CAMP
J-ABORATtWY REPORT FOR MCB CAMP
ADMIH RECORD i5j
ADMIN RECORD BEMIVOUTILES
MOOMf"
DATA
3(001
010J
001127 OV2S/»r
07/1S/W
02.2
CII2H HILL
PEGGY A. NORTON
IT CORPORATION
DAVE HARK
ATA JOH «CB Out
VOLATILES. SEM1VOLATILES. TFH,
M00461
DATA
0394
0012<4 OS/27/94 HESTON 'MANAGERS
07/19/91
: 0016« IT CORPORATION
02.2
VOLATJLBS"
SEHIVOLAT1LCS
TFH
METALS
PESTICIDES
-------
DATE - 01/24/M
PAGE - 130
RECORD PILE INDEX (SORTED BY DOC. DATE)
UIC No, DOC. HO.
DOCIWEOT.TYPE. . .
CON-nt/GUID. .NO. .
APPROX.f. OF. PAGES
M00681
DATA
0231
H006B1
DATA
0391
H00661
DATA
0318
H00681
DATA
020S
H00681
DATA
0194
H00681
DATA
0122
M00681
DATA
01B9
001267
001269
001,268
001270
001271
001259
001260
M006B1 002363
DATA
ooooooooooooooo
0026
H006B1
DATA
0113
M006B1
DATA
0269
001273
001275
PRC.DATC
DOC. DATE
CTO.NO..
EPA. CAT*
OS/27/94
07/20/93
00166
02.2
OS/21/94
07/20/93
00166
02.2
05/27/94
07/21/93
00166
02.2
OS/27/94
07/21/93
00166
02.2
OS/27/94
97/21/93
00166
02.2
05/27/94
07/22/93
00166
02.2
05/27/94
07/22/93
00166
02.2
07/21/94
07/23/93
00166
02.2
OS/27/94
07/27/93
00166
02.2
05/27/94
07/27/93
00166
02.2
FR OH. SIGNATURE
TO
TO. SIGNATURE
HESTON MANAGERS
IT CORPORATION
HESTOH MANAGERS
IT CORPORATION
• i V ' "
NESTON MANAGERS
IT CORPORATION
HESTON MANAGERS
IT CORPORATION
NESTON MANAGERS
IT CORPORATION
HESTON MANAGERS
IT CORPORATION
HESTON MANAGERS
IT CORPORATION
ESE
MCB CAHP PBNDLETON
HESTON MANAGERS
IT CORPORATION
HESTOH MANAGERS
IT CORPORATION
LABORATORY REPORT FOR MCB CAHP PENDLETON ADMIN RECORD VOLATILES
VOLATILE PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS ANALYSIS SDGI H3004 TPH
RFHI 93065163. 9306S164.9306S180.9306S1B1.9306S1I2
LABORATORY REPORT FOR MCB CAMP PBNDLETON ADMIN RECORD IOG
CLP INORGANIC METALS ANALYSIS SDGI H3004 METALS
RFHI 9306S163. 93065164. 93065180. 9306S181.9306S162
LABORATORY REPORT FOR HCB CAHP PENDLETON ADHIN RECORD DATA
HBT CHEMISTRY ANALYSIS SDGI H3D04
RFHI 9306S163.9306S164.9306S110, 93065181. 9306S182
LABORATORY REPORT FOR HCB CAHP PENDLETON ADMIN RECORD • HERBICIDE
HERBICIDES ANALYSIS SDGI W004 RFHI 930*8164 .
9306S1I0.9306S1I2 .
LABORATORY REPORT FOR HCB CAHP PENDLETON ADMIN RECORD TEH
TOTAL EXTRACTABLE HYDROCARBONS ANALYSIS SDGI H3004
RFHI 9306S163. 9306S164 , 9306SKO, 9306S181. 9306S182
LABORATORY REPORT FOR HCB CAMP PENDLETON ADHIN RECORD TPH
:VOLATILE PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS ANALYSIS SDGI H3020 VOLATILES
IRFHI 9306S193; 9306S194.9306S22S
LABORATORY REPORT FOR MCB CAMP PENDLETON ADHIN RECORD PESTICIDES
CLP ORGANOCHLORINE PESTICIDES ANALYSIS SDOIt H3004
RFHI 9306S164, 9)065180.93068182
'MATRIX: HATER ADMIN RECORD HATER
PARAMETERS: GENERAL CHEMISTRY CASEt NACPH7G
G3S714.G36446.C360S9.G3S103.G3S3 34, GJS7 IS. G36442,
LABORATORY REPORT FOR HCB CAMP PENDLETON ADMIN RECORD TEH
TOTAL EXTRACTABLE HYDROCARBONS ANALYSIS SDGK H30201.
RFMt 9306S193. 93065194. 930SS22S
LABORATORY REPORT FOR HCB CAMP PENDLETON ADMIN RECORD 100
CLP INORGANICS METALS ANALYSIS SDGI H3020 METALS
RFHI 9306S193.9306S194.9306S206.9306S225.9306S2S9
-------
DATE - 08/21/99 , •
me NO,; DOC.NO. -PREDATE FRC*.... HC" aw|M"Ilun«l.*»I"'n«*TivB RECORD PILE INDEX (SORTED BY
DOCUMENT.TYPE... DOC.DATE FROM. SIGNATURE ' ! .! • '
COHIR/GUID. .NO..; :CTO.NO.. >TO.... ' <
APPROX.».OF.PAGES;EPA.CAT» iTO.SIGNATURE
DOC. DATE)
CLASSIFICATION
KEY WORDS
•-Site Location
M00681
DATA
015)
DATA
0193
001275 " J05/27/94
^07/27/93
00166
'02.2
07/27/JJ
00166
1 •• 02.2
HESTQH MANAGERS
IT CORPORATION
IT CORPORATION
HESTOH MANAGERS
•LABORATORY REPORT FOR MCB CAMP
HERBICIDES ANALYSIS SPC» H3020
i ' .
PENDLETON
RFW) 930SS22S
UUWKATORY REPORT FOR MCB CAMP PENDLETOM
CLP ORQAHOCHLORINE PESTICIDES ANALYSIS SDC» H2984
RFH» 9307S40S. 9306S13S
LABORATORY REPORT FOR MCB CUtf
ADMIN RECORD HERBICIDE
ADMIN RECORD PESTICIDES ~ : —
DATA 07/27/83
:001«« IT CORPORATION
0161 02.2 ,
--—• —•>« ( vn >^i.u ^nnr rdtifLtCi lUft
CLP ORGANOCHLORIHE PESTICICBS ANALYSIS SDGH H3020
RF«« S30SS225
HOOtelOOJ279 ; 05/27/94 WESTON MANAQERS"
DATA 07/28/93
0016« • IT CORPORATION
0230 -02.2 ' '• :
LABORATORY REPORT FOR MCB CAMP PEKDLETON
WET CHEMISTRY SDGf W3020 RFH« 9306S193,9306S194
9306S205.S930«S22S,S9306S2S9
MOOS81002482^08/09/94QUAHTLEX
DATA 07/J8/93
01M66S920066 0016S MCB CAMP PENDLETON
0032 ,02.2
MCB CAMP PENLETOM MATRIX: WATER PARAMETER!
VOLATILES LABiESE SDO: G3S39B. G361S7
ADM:N RECORD
ADMIN RECORD
ADMIN RECORD
MOOS8100240308/09/94QOANTLEX
DATA 07/28/93
01FUSS9200S6 001C6 KCB CAMP PENDLETON
OOSO 02.2
MCB CAMP PENLETON MATRIX: HATER PARAMETER-
VOIATILES LA8.-ESE SDG, G35397.G35398,G35399.C36496
ADMIN RECORD
PESTICIDES
DATA
HATER
VOLATILES
HATER
SOUTHWEST DIVISION
SOUTHWEST DIVISION
H00631 002484
DATA
01F166S920066
0063
M00661 0024BS
DATA
01F16GS920066
OOS1
DATA
01F166S920066
0014
DATA
3(209
0233
08/09/94
07/28/93
00166
02.2
OB/10/94
07/28/S3
C0166
02.2
07/28/93
D0166
02.2
07/30/93
02.2
OUAMTLEX
MCB CAMP PENDLETON
QUANTLEX "* ~ "
MCB CAMP PENDLETON
MCB CAMP PENDLETON
PEGGY A. KORTON
IT CORPORATION
DAVE HARK
"UJ CAMP PENLETON MATRIX: HATER PARAMETER; ADMIM RECORP '"
TCL METALS HITH BORON, CTANODE, AND MOLYBDENUM
SDG:G3S3J8, 034107. G35740,G3«332.G35751,G3«374,G3633«,
HCB CAMP PENLETON MATRIX, HATER PARAMETER: ADMIN RECORD "
TCL METALS WITH BORON. CYANIDE, AND MOLYBDENUM
LAB: BSE SDGI C3G2S1, G3S631
MCB CAMP PENLETON MATRIX: HATER PARAMETER: ADMIN RECTOS
TPH GASOLINE * TPH DIESEL LAB: USE CASE» NACPH8D
SpGfl G354fi2
ANALYTICAL DATA FOR MCB CAMP PENDLETON APMIM ppfvan
VOLATILES. SEMIVOLATILES, PESTICIDES, PCB. TFH, METALS
HATER ~ "~~~
HATER
METALS
CYANIDE
HATER
TPH
VOLATILES ~
SEMIVOLATILES
PESTICIDES
. PCB
TFH
METALS
SOUTHWEST DIVISION
SOUTHWEST DIVISIOH
SOUTHVEST DIVISION
-------
DATE - 0§/2«/JI
UIC HO. DOC.HO. PHC DATE FROM «™ CAMP PEHDLETON ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD FJLE INDEX (SORTED BY DOC.
DOCUMENT. TYPE. .
COKTR/GUID..NO.
APPRO*, i. OF. PAG
HOOCH 001130
DATA
36198
0258.
H00681 001137
DATA
36235
0912
H00681 001139
DATA
36234
0332
M00681 001280
DATA
0112
MOOC81 001285
DATA
0096
M00681 001284
DATA
0070
DATA
014S
M00681 001282
DATA
0065
DATA
0159
. DOC.OATE FROM.SICNATURE. .
. CTO.HO.. TO
ES EPA.CATi TO.SJCNATURE
•••i* *••*••••••••••••••••••.»••»,
05/25/94 CH2M HILL
07/30/93 PEGGY A. NORTON
IT CORPORATION
02.2 DAVK MARK
05/25/94 CHJH HILL
08/06/91 PEGGY A. NORTON
i IT CORPORATION
02.2 DAVE HARK
08/06/93 PEGGY A. NORTON
IT CORPORATION
02. 2 DAVE MARK
j. • . ' '
08/11/93
00166 IT CORPORATION
02 'a
05/27/94 HESTON MANAGERS "
08/11/93
00166 IT CORPORATION
02.2
05/27/94 HESTON MANAGERS
08/16/93
OOU6 IT CORPORATION
02.2
08/19/93
00166 IT CORPORATION
02.2
OS/27/94 UESTON MANAGERS
08/26/93
00166 IT CORPORATION
02.2
05/27/94 HESTON MANAGERS
08/31/91
00166 IT CORPORATION
02.2
.... CLASSIFICATION
ANALYTICAL DATA FOR MCB CAMP PENDLETOM utna „,.-.,..
VOLATILES. SEMIVOLATILES. PESTICIDES. PCD. TFH. HETALS ""
ANALYTICAL DATA FOR MCB CAMP PENDLETON ADM1H ,--„„;:
VOLATILES. SEMIVOLATILES. RISK ASSESSMENT C°"D
ANALYTICAL DATA FOR MCB CAMP PENDLETON ~' ADHIH RECORD
Rl" ASMSSMEOTV°UmES* TF"' METALS< PESTIC'DES, PCB
; i i,
LABORATORY REPORT FOR MCB CAMP PENDLETON ~ ADMIN RECOBB
CL? GCMS SEMIVOLATILE ANALYSIS SDG« S3060
LABORATORY REPORT FOR MCB CAMp'pENDLETOil ADHIH RrrnSn
CLP GCMS VOLATILE ANALYSIS SDG8 S3060 RF*| 9J07S468
"ORATORY REPORT FOR HCB CAMP PENDLETON aSmJ — -
LABORATORY REPORT FOR HCB CAMP PENDLETON ... ---,„-
HERBICIDES ANALYSIS SDG» S3060 RFHK 9307S468
LJUjuwilUHr REPORJ K)k HCB CAMP PENDLETON AnM?M Ofr-nan
RFWI M^T^""1 """"^WBONS ANALYSIS SDGI S3060 KtCOHD
Rm0^^"^^^1^^""™00' S106° *DMIN ***"
KEY WORDS . . .site Location
VOLATILES
SEHIVOALTILES
PESTICIDES
PCS
TFH
METALS
VOALTILES '
SEMIVOLATILES
RA
VOALTI£ES~~ ~~ •
SEMIVOLATILES
TFH
METALS
PESTICIDES
PCS
RA
SENIVOALTILES ~ ~
VOLATILES ~ ~ •
T'PH - — —
HERBICIDE ~ ~~
XEH " ~~" : • — —
PESTICIDES
- J32
-------
DATE - 0»/24/S§
MCB
D^^T ™;"°-: P*C-D*™ WOM' .....
SS5SK3i::s gg-jr r-SICTWTURE::
APPROX.I.OP.PAGES EPA.CAT* •
PENOLETON AD«INISTRAmE RECORD „„
.................... SUBJECT.. .
"
PAGE - J33
KEY HORDS
H00681 001292 > OS/27/,4 HESTON MANAGERS
UAT* 09/08/93 s
••s»te Location
; IT CORPORATION
H00681 OOlUTi ;«WaWMiITCORWIW™B
nw ! 09/10/93
• 01G« :
029S
*»*LfStS DATA FOR MCB CAMP PENDLETON
SDGK CP002 HERBICIDE
05/25/94 CH2M
09/17/93 PEGGV A. NORTON
IT CORPORATION
02.2 DAVE HARK
corn
DATA
36563
OJ27
oomo"
oom
DATA
000000000000000
1385
M00681
DATA
36561
0215
0460
001 14 9
05/25/94 CH2MHILL"
; 09/17/93 PEGGY A. NORTON
OOI6S IT CORPORATIOH
02-2 DAVE HftRK
05/25/94 IT CORPORATION
09/22/93
00000
02.2
05/25/94 CH2M HILL"
09/24/93 PEGGY A. NORTON
00166 IT CORPORATION
02.2 DAVE MARK
ADMIHRECOR0 METAZT
RA
05/24/9r
10/11/93
00166
02.2
IT CORPORATION
AMALYTICAL DATA FOR HCB CAMP
ASSESSMENT, PESWID^.
"ADMIN RECORD
"ADMIN RECORD^
RA
PESTICIDES
PCS
METALS
CYANIDE
SSF °^ 05/24/34 IT CORPORATIOM
unT" 10/H/93
00166
0269 o, ,
»«•« 001106 ui/rt/M IT CORPORATJON-
"ATA 10/11/93
0!20
H00.ll 001107 ,,WJb/l4 IT CORPORATION
"ATA 10/11/93
0166
0281 02.2
UAIA tOH MC'H CAMp PENOLETON '
CP002-D GASOLINE FUEL HYDROCARBONS
Mca
-F PESTICIDES AND PCBs
ADMIN RECORD ~" TPH
ADMIN RECORD "PESTICIDES'
PCB
-------
DATE - 08/24/9J
.„_ , „ HCB CAHP PENDLETON ADMINISTRATIVE
UICKo. DOC.HO. PRC.DATE FROM
DOCWtEHT.TXPE... DOC.DATE FROH.SICNATURE
COWTR/GUID..NO.. CTO.HO.. TO suniPrr
APPROX.I.OF.PAGBS EPA.CATI TO.SICNATTOB ' """-i.
INDEX (SORTED BY DOC. DATE)
PACE - 134
CLASSIFICATION KEY HORDS
•Site Location.
HOMtl 00110J 05/2S/94 IT CORPORATION
DATA 10/11/95
0166
0142 02.2
ANALYSIS DATA FOR HCB CAMP PENDLETOH
SDO» CP002-C DIESEL FUEL HYDROCARBONS
ADMIN RECORD
M006I1
DATA
03(0
001110 OS/25/S4 IT CORPORATION
10/11/93
0165
.02.2
ANALYSIS DATA FOR HCB
SDGI CP002-H VOLATILE
CAHP PENDLETON
ORCAHICS
ADHIN RECORD VOC
HOOtSl 001111 OS/25/94 IT CORPORATION
DATA ;10/11/93
0166
0656 02.2
ANALYSIS DATA FOR HCB CAHP PENDLETOH
SDGH CP002-C SEMIVOLATILES ORGANICS
ADMIN RECORD SEHIVOALTILES
H006I1 001112 OS/2S/94 IT CORPORATION
DATA .10/11/93
0166 i
0709 ;03.2 i •
. ANALYSIS DATA FOR HCB CAHP PENDLETON "
SDO» CP002-A METALS. BORON. .CYANIDE AND MOLYBDENUM
ADHIN RECORD
M00681 001069 OS/24/94 IT CORPORATION
DATA 10/12/93
00166
0838 02.2
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS FOR HCB CAMP PENDLETOH
ODCt CP003-C SEHIUOLATILE ORGANICS
HOOG81 001070 05/21/94 IT CORPORATION
DATA 10/12/93
00166
0119 02.2 .:
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS FOR MCB CAMP PENDLETON
SDG» CP003-D GASOLINE FUEL HYDROCARBONS
ADMIN RECORD
H00681 001072 OS/24/94 IT CORPORATION
DATA 10/12/93
001(6
0122 02.2
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS FOR HCS CAMP PENDLETON
SDG» CP003-E DIESEL FUEL HYDROCARBONS
ADHIN RECORD
METALS
CYANIDE
ADHIH RECORD SENIVOLATILES
TFH
DATA 10/12/93
00166
02«S 02.2
r CORPORATION CERTIFICATE
1 SDOK CP003-F
OF ANALYSIS
PESTICIDES
FOR
nun
HCB CAMP
PCBs
PENDLETON
ADHIN RECORD PESTICIDES
MOOm 001119 OS/2S/94 IT CORPORATION
DATA 10/14/93
OUS
0870 02.2
ANALYSIS DATA FOR HCB CAMP PENDLETON
SDGI CP001-C SEHIVOLATILE ORGANICS
ADHIN RECORD
SEHIVOALTILES
MOOW1 001120 05/25/94 IT CORPORATION
DATA 10/14/93
OU(
0477 02.J
ANALYSIS DATA FOR M
SDG» CP001-0 WATER
PENDLETON
ADHIN RECORD
HATER
.1
-------
DATE . 0§/24/98 ' i
OICNO. DOC.HO.; PRC.DATE FROM.
HCB
. - - . HO.. ': CTO. NO.. • TO
APPROXJII.OF.PAGES EPA.CAT»[ TO; siaNATURE" "
—"•••—«...i.....i ...i'.'.'.
WOW! 001121 05/25/94 IT CORPORATION
DATA 10/14/93
i 016S ;
0477 :. 02 I ,
CAKP PENDLETON ADH.NISTRATIVE RECORD FILE INDEX (SOHTED By
SUBJECT _
;;;•>. CLASSIFICATION KEY HOHDS
PAGE -
•S>C= Location
001122
0147
0219
H00681
DATA
0850
001124
05/2S/94
10/14/93
0166
02.2
OS/2S/94
10/14/93
0166
02.2
OS/2S/9T
10/14/93
0166
02.2
IT CORPORATION
ANALYSIS DATA FOR HCB CAMP PENDtEKW
I SDOff CP001 METALS. TFH. PESTICIDES. PCBs
TAHALYSIS DATA FOR HCB CAMP PEHDLETON" ~
SDO» CPOOl-D CASOLINE FUEL HYOROCMBOHS
ADMIN RECORD
ADMIN RECORD
METALS
TFH
PESTICIDES
IT CORPORATION"
«nr. B^MTA FOH MCB C*MP PENDLETON
,SDG» CPOOl-E DIESEL FUEL HYDROCARBONS
ANALYSIS DATA FOK HCB CAMP PENDLBTON"
SOCK CP001-A METALS. BORON. CYANIDE AND MOLYBDENUM
ADMIN RECORD
067S
M006B1
DATA
OB 77
0410
H00681
DATA
0184
M006S1
DATA
0011IS
001117
001118
05/25/S4
10/15/93
0166
02.2
OS/2S/94
10/15/93
'0168
02.2
05/25/94
10/15/93
OH6
02.2
05/25/94"
10/15/93
0166
02.2
05/2S/94
10/15/93
0166
02.2
UA1A tOK MCB CAMP PENDLETON
CP004-A METALS. BORON, CTWJDE
IT CORPORATION
IT CORPORATION
IT CORPORATION
IT CORPORATION
,„.. „„,, DATA FOR MCB CAMP PENDLETON '
SDQII CP004-C SEM1VOLATILE ORGANICS
«WH» RECORD METALS"
CYANIDE
ADMIN RECORD SBMIVOLATILEs"
PENDLBTON
-E DIESEL FUEL HYRDOCARBON^
AHALYSlTuAIA tUH MCV CAMP PENDLETON
SDO( CP004-0 GASOLINE FUEL HYRDOCARBONS
AD«IN RECORD
ADMIN RECORD"
TFH
-------
DATE - 01/24/SI
UIC »o. v DOC.NO. PRC.DATE FROM ......... "? CWP.PEHDLEICH ^'HISTOATIVE RECORD FILE INDEX (SORTED BY DOC. OATEI
DOCUMENT. TYPE. .. DOC.DATE
COHTR/CUID..HO.. CTO.HO. .
APPXOX.I. OF. FADES EPA.CATI
HOOCfl
DATA
03(9
H006I1
DATA
0195
DATA
1243
DATA
0410
H006I1
DATA
0793
H006I1
DATA
0742
H00681
DATA
0149
M00681
DATA
0162
DATA
0200
H00681
DATA
0446
ooiots
001095
001101
001102
001093
001094
001096
05/24/94
10/21/93
001«6
02.3
OS/25/94
10/21/93
0166
02.2
10/21/93
0166
02.2
10/21/93
0166
02.2
OS/25/94
10/21/93
0166
02.2
05/25/94
10/21/93
01<6
02.2
10/21/93
0166
02.2
OS/25/94
10/28/93
0166
02.2
05/25/94
10/29/93
0166
02.2
05/25/94
10/28/91
0166
02.2
FROM. SIGNATURE. .
TO
TD.SIGtJATURE
IT CORPORATION
IT CORPORATION
IT CORPORATION
IT CORPORATION '
CLASSIFICATION KEY WORDS •:,»,. , ,
****"•*** ••»o*tc... ••«» LOCACion
"ATER HATER
ANALYSIS DATA FOB Mm
AHALltSIS DATA FOR MCB CAMP PEHni.rr™ M1HIH HE-JRD
SDG» CPOD2-0 CARBONATE\BICARBONATE "ttORD DATA
ANLYSIS DATA FOR MCH CMIf DTOni Eiviu mjlll HECaar
SDGII CP006-D GASOLINE FUEL HYDROCARBONS "
ANALYSIS DATA FOR MCB CAMP PENDLETON ' "" ADMTM pprocn 5^n — -
SDG» CP006-E DIESEL FUEb HYDROCARBONS
SDC, CP006, VOLATILE OROANKS — «
PACE - 136
-------
DATE - 01/24/91
U1C NO. DOC.NO. PRC.DATE FROM
DOCUMENT.TYPE DOC. DATE FROM. SIGNATURE.
COHTR/CUID. .MO..; CTO.NO.. TO.
APPROX. B. OF. PAGES EPA. CAM TO. SIGNATURE. . .
PENDLETOK ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD FILE INDEX (SORTED BY DOC. DATE)
SUBJECT CLASSIFICATION KEY WORDS
PAGE . 117
.Site...
.Location
K00681 I 001097 ' OS/2S/94 IT CORPORATION
DATA
0471
DATA
0941
10/28/93
0166
^02.2
**IN RECORD SEHIVOLATItES
H00681 : 001083 OS/24/94 IT CORPORATION
10/29/93
00166
02.2
M00601 001084 OS/24/94 IT CORPORATION
DATA 10/29/93
00166
1056 02.2
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS FOR MCB OWP PENDLETON
SDGfl CP007-0 WATER
ADMIN RECORD - MATER
-"••.«
DATA
0552
10/29/93
0016S
02.2
001087 OS/24/94 IT CORPORATION
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS FOR MCB CAMP PENDLETON
SDCS CP007-A KETALS, BORON, CYANIDE AND MOLYBDENUM
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS FOR MCB CAMP PENDLETOM
ADMIN RECORD METALS ~ '
CYANIDE
ADMIN RECORD TFH " —
10/29/91
00166
0215 62.2
SDG» CP007-E DIESEL FUEL HYDROCARBONS
DATA
0530
DATA
0507
10/29/93
00166
02.2
JO/29/93
00166
02.2
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS FOR MCB CAHP PENDLETOM
SDGK CP007-N VOLATILE ORGANICS
ADHIN RECORD
VOLATtLES
"""»>«»
DATA
0199
10/29/93
00166
02.2
H00681 001092 OS/25/94 IT CORPORATION
DATA ' 10/29/93
0166
0235 02.2
PESTICIDE
DATA
0142
10/29/93
0166
02.2
-------
DATE - 01/24/JI
HCB
UIC Ho. DOC.HO. PRC.DATE FHOH.
DOOHERTTVPE... DOC.DATE FROH.,.vrawBE..
COHTR/CUID..NO.. CTO.KO.. TO
" SPACES BPA.CAT* TO.siGNATUSE!;.'.'
CAMP PEHDLETOH ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD FILE IHDBt (SORTED B1 DOC.
SUBJECT
DATE)
MOOSBl
DATA
OIK
001104
05/25/J4
10/29/9J
0166
02.2
IT CORPORATION
ANALYSIS DATA FOR HCB CAMP PENDLBTOH
SDCI CP005-E DIESEL FUEL HYDROCARBONS
.......... CLASSIFICATION
"*"
ADH1N RECORD
KEr HORDS
PAGE . 1J,
•Site Locution
OS/24/94
11/03/93
00166
02.2
SDOB CP009-H HERBICIDES
W'.««"*«« FOR HCB CAHP PEHDLETOH
SDQ» CPOOJ-H HERBICIDES HATER
05/24/94
11/05/92
00166
02.2
SDG» CPOOS-0 MATER
OS/24/94
ll/OS/93
.00166
02.1
CERTlFICAl* W__ANAUSUS FOR HCB CAW
SDOI CPOOJ-C SEHIVOLAT1LE ORGANICS
05/24/94
11/05/93
00166
:02.2
CERTmCATE OF AKALYSIS FOR MCB CAMP
SDO» CPOOB-F PESTICIDES AND PCB,
oni
0185
OS/24/94 JT CORPORATION
11/05/93
00166
02.2
05/24/94
11/05/93
00166
02.2
MW CPOOa-E DIESEL-FSL-HlCR^«B^SM(fCLETON
: OF ANALYSIS FOR MCB omp"pramprfini
SDC» CP008-D GASOLINE FUEL ^0^0^^
AOMIN RECORD
ADMIM RECORD
TFH
TFH
-------
DATE -'. 08/24/91,:
UIC No. KX.HO. PRC.DATE
DOCUMENT. TYPE... DOC.DATE
COOTR/GUID. .NO.. CTO.NO..
APPRO*.».OF. PAGES EPA. CATS
M006M; 001054
MTA
000000000000000
0100
raOM HCB.™" PENDLETON ~H»'««IIVB RECORD FILE INDEX (SORTED BY DOC. DATE,
FROM: SIGNATURE...'.'..
TO.SIGNATURE!'.-'.'.'.'.'.'. -.SUBJECT CLASSIFICATION KEYWORDS
PACE - 139
...Sice
M00681 00109)
DATA
0581
M00681001050
DATA
000000000000000
0375
OS/24/94
11/11/93
00166
02.2
05/25/94
11/11/93
0166
02.2
IT CORPORATION
DAVE MARK
F°R ** CW1P PENDLBTOM
*««» "CORD
ANALYSIS DATA FOR HCB CAMP PENDLETON
SDGD CP006-A METALS. BORON, CYANIDE AND MOLYBDENUM
"*TBR
METALS
CYANIDE
OS/24/94
11/13/93
0016«
02.2
IT CORPORATION
DAVE MARK
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS FOR HCB CAMP PENDLETON
OBGW(ICS
M00681 001059
DATA
000000000000000
05/24/94
11/12/93
00166
02.2 -
IT CORPORATION
DAVE MARK
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS FOR MCB CAMP PENDLETON
SDGK CP010-D FUEL HYDROCARBONS GASOLINE
SOUTHWEST DIVISION
ADMIN RECORD TFH
GROUP"! SOUTHWEST DIVISION
-------
DATE - 01/24/JI
! Ho. DOC.KO. PRC.DATE
-
D..HO.. CTO.NO..
MWOX.I.OF.PACES EPA.CATf
FROH K« CAMP PEHDLETOH ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD FILE INDEX
WOH.SICHATTOB.".'.'."
TO
^^^ •*••••••••.,,... •«••••«.•.,.,.,, SUBJECT"
By DOC. DATE)
... CLASSIFICATION XE* KURDS
HOOCH 0010C2
DATA
05/24/94
11/12/93
001(6
02.2
[T CORPORATION
DAVE MARK
PACE -
Si«e Location
"* "''*•«••--•«»««••••••,•.B-
SOimWEST DIVISION
Mooeai 00106?
DATA
0113
0162
M00681001055
DATA
ooooooooooooooo
0382
MO0(91001059
DATA
OOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
0150
05/24/94
11/12/93
00166
02.2
05/24/94
11/12/93
'00166
02.2
IT CORPORATION
>l/16/93
00166
02.2
05/24/94
11/16/93
00166
02.2
IT CORPORATION
DAVE MARK
IT CORPORATION
DAVE MARX
)P
-E DIESEL FULE HYDROCARBONS
"CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS FOR HCB CADP PENDLETOT
ODG» CP009-D GASOLINE FUEL HTOROCARBONS^
OF ANALYSIS FOR HCB CAMP
ADMIN RECORD ~TfH~
ADMIN RECORD TFH~
ADHIH RECORDHETALS
CYANIDE
SOUTHWEST DIVISION
SOOTHHEST DIVISION
M00681 001060
CPOI1-C SEHIVOLATILES OHGANICS
000000000000000
ADMIN RECORD SEMIVOLATILES
M00(81 001063
000000000000000
-F PESTICIDES AND PCBs
ADMIN RECORD PESTICIDES 5555?^
SS51""1 UNDEaSROUN'5 *™"GE ™ *™ ^SEilMlN?
MOB CAMP PENDLETON
ADHIN RECORD PR
ESR
OST
SOUTHWEST DIVISIOM
-------
DATE - 08/24/9
UIC No. DOC.HO. PRC.DATE FROM
DOCUMENT,TYPE. .. DOC.DATE FROM.SIGNATURE
COUTH/QUID. .HO.. CTO.NO.. TO
APPROX.«.OF. PAGES EPA.CAT*
MCB CAMP reNDLETON ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD FILE INDEX (SORTED BY DOC. DATE)
MCE - HI
.SUBJECT CLASSIFICATION
KEV KORDS
H00681
DATA
002211
000000000000000
0052
DATA
000000000000000
0021
06/30/94
02/03/94
00166
04.4
08/26/97
03/08/95
00000
01.1
I.T. CORPORATION
SHERRY GAZZIGLI
SOUTHWEST DIVISION
CHRIS POTTER
CORRECTIONS TO SCO'S SENT BY THE IT LAB.
MISCELLANEOUS DATA INCLUDING ATTENDANCE SHEET TO
MAR. B. 1995 ECOIOGICIAI, RISK ASSESSMENT SCOPING
SESSION AND SOIL EXPOSURE FOR VARIOUS SITES
ADMIN RECORD
ADMIN RECORD DATA ~
INFO REPOSITORY SOIL
HABITAT
SOUTHWEST DIVISION
ID SOUTHWEST DIVISION
IE MCB CAMP PEHDLETON
2B
RA
2C
10
IB
17
2SN
26
27
28
29
30
3S
-------
TOTAL RECORDS PRINTED: U{0
REPORT SPECIFICATIOH FOR: RPT210
TITLE, HCB CAMP PEHDL£TOH munmttrm „„„„ „„
FILE: Centr.l Activity Flic Doiuntnt.
SELECTION CRITERIA:
(01) Type IS -DATA- C UIC.Ko. IS -HOOtll •
SORT CRITERIA:
01 Dae. Date
PAGE BREAK LEVEL:
00 NO PAQEBRBAK
TfPE REPORT FORM
PAPER MASTER ACTIVITY FILE t«Ith Xey/Add Info,
-------
s o "o
o c oa>
>E
±20)®
M- a1" ~
0
O
Reproduced by NTIS
National Technical Information Service
Springfield, VA 22161
report was printed specifically for your order
from nearly 3 million titles available in our collection.
For economy and efficiency, NTIS does not maintain stock of its vast
collection of technical reports. Rather, most documents are printed for
each order. Documents that are not in electronic format are reproduced
from master archival copies and are the best possible reproductions
available. If you have any questions concerning this document or any
order you have placed with NTIS, please call our Customer Service
Department at (703) 605-6050.
About NTIS
NTIS collects scientific, technical, engineering, and business related
information — then organizes, maintains, and disseminates that
information in a variety of formats — from microfiche to online services.
The NTIS collection of nearly 3 million titles includes reports describing
research conducted or sponsored by federal agencies and their
contractors; statistical and business information; U.S. military
publications; multimedia/training products; computer software and
electronic databases developed by federal agencies; training tools; and
technical reports prepared by research organizations worldwide.
Approximately 100,000 new titles are added and indexed into the NTIS
collection annually.
For more information about NTIS products and services, call NTIS
at 1-800-553-NT1S (6847) or (703) 605-6000 and request the free
NTIS Products Catalog, PR-827LPG, or visit the NTIS Web site
http ://www.ntis.gov.
NTIS
Your indispensable resource for government-sponsored
information—U.S. and worldwide
-------
------- |