EPA 542-B-00-005
June 2000
Site Remediation Technology InfoBase:
A Guide to Federal Programs,
Information Resources, and Publications
on Contaminated Site Cleanup
Technologies
Second Edition
Prepared by the Member Agencies of the Federal Remediation
Technologies Roundtable:
Federal Remediation
Technologies
Roundtable
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Department of Defense
U.S. Air Force
U.S. Army
U.S. Navy
Department of Energy
Department of Interior
National Aeronautics and Space
Administ ration
Tennessee Valley Authority
Coast Guard
-------
NOTICE
This document has been funded by the United States Environmental Protection Agency under
Contract 68-W-00-084. It has been subject to administrative review by all agencies participating
in the Federal Remediation Technologies Roundtable, and has been approved for publication. Any
mention of trade names or commercial products does not constitute endorsement or
recommendation for use.
-------
-------
TABLE OF CONTENTS
FEDERAL CLEANUP PROGRAMS 1
U.S. Department of Defense Cleanup Programs 2
DoD Environmental Quality Mission and Challenges 2
DoD Environmental Quality RDT&E Process 3
Defense Environmental Restoration
Program 4
U.S. Army Defense Environmental
Restoration Program 5
U.S. Air Force Major Commands 5
U.S. Navy Facilities Engineering Command 5
U.S. Department of Energy Cleanup Programs 7
Environmental Restoration Program Needs 7
Environmental Technology Development Programs and Services 7
Technology Focus Areas 8
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Cleanup Programs 10
Hazardous Waste Cleanup Sites 10
RCRA Corrective Action Sites 11
Underground Storage Tank Sites 11
FEDERAL SITE REMEDIATION
TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT
ASSISTANCE PROGRAMS 12
Interagency R&D Assistance Programs 13
Rapid Commercialization Initiative 13
Small Business Innovative Research Program/Small Business Technology Transfer Research
Program 14
U.S. Department of Defense R&D Assistance Programs 15
Air Force Center for Environmental Excellence 15
Environmental Security Technology Certification Program 15
National Environmental Technology Test Sites (NETTS) Program 16
Naval Environmental Leadership Program 18
Strategic Environmental Research and Development Program 18
Unexploded Ordnance Technology Demonstration Program 19
U.S. Army Environmental Center 20
U.S. Department of Energy R&D Assistance Programs 22
Industry and University Programs Area 22
Program Research & Development Announcements/Research Opportunity Announcements
22
TechCon 23
Technology Development Initiative 24
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency R&D Assistance Programs 25
Environmental Technology Verification Program 25
National Center for Environmental Research 26
Remediation Technologies Development Forum 26
Superfund Innovative Technology Evaluation Program 27
-------
FEDERAL SITE REMEDIATION
TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT
ELECTRONIC DATA BASES 30
U.S. Department of Commerce 31
National Technical Information Service (NTIS) Bibliographic DataBase 31
U.S. Department of Energy 31
DOE R&D Project Summaries Web Data Base 31
New Technology from DOE 32
ReOpt: Electronic Encyclopedia of Remedial Action Options 32
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 33
Bioremediation in the Field Search System 33
RREL Treatability Data Base 33
Vendor Information System for Innovative Treatment Technologies/Vendor Field Analytical
Characterization Technology System 34
FEDERAL ELECTRONIC RESOURCES FOR SITE REMEDIATION
TECHNOLOGY INFORMATION 36
Federal Remediation Technologies Roundtable 37
U.S. Department of Defense 37
Defense Environmental Network and Information Exchange 37
Fielding Environmental Solutions 37
Technology Summary Sheets 38
U.S. Department of Energy 38
Environmental Technologies Remedial Actions Data Exchange (EnviroTRADE) 38
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 39
Alternative Treatment Technology Information Center 39
Hazardous Waste Cleanup Information System 39
National Center for Environmental Publications and Information 40
OTHER ELECTRONIC RESOURCES FOR SITE REMEDIATION
TECHNOLOGY INFORMATION 42
Global Network for Environmental Technology 43
Groundwater Remediation Technologies Analysis Center 43
National Technology Transfer Center 44
SELECTED BIBLIOGRAPHY:
FEDERAL PUBLICATIONS ON ALTERNATIVE AND INNOVATIVE SITE REMEDIATION
TECHNOLOGIES 46
BIOLOGICAL 47
EPA 47
U.S. Air Force 49
U.S. Army 49
CONFERENCES AND INTERNATIONAL SURVEYS 51
EPA 51
U.S. Army 51
GROUNDWATER 53
DOE 53
EPA 53
U.S. Army 56
-------
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL 58
EPA 58
U.S. Army 62
U.S. Navy 62
TECHNOLOGY SURVEY REPORTS 63
DOE 63
EPA 64
U.S. Army 67
U.S. Navy 68
DoD 69
THERMAL PROCESSES 71
DOE 71
EPA 71
TREATABILITY STUDIES 73
EPA 73
U.S. Army 73
APPENDIX A-l
TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM CONTACTS A-l
U.S. Department of Defense A-l
U.S. Department of Energy A-2
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency A-2
in
-------
This page intentionally left blank.
IV
-------
FEDERAL CLEANUP PROGRAMS
-------
U.S. Department of Defense Cleanup Programs
DoD Environmental Quality Mission and
Challenges
The Department of Defense's Environmental
Quality Research, Development, Testing, and
Evaluation (EQ RDT&E) program is based on
four requirements that constitute the pillars of
DoD's environmental security mission. DoD is
required to:
(1) Cleanup hazardous wastes resulting from
past practices at active, formerly used, and to-
be-closed military sites;
(2) Comply with laws by controlling hazardous
emissions from its systems and operations;
(3) Prevent pollution through substitutions of
materials and processes to significantly
reduce or eliminate the generation of
pollutants; and
(4) Conserve natural and cultural resources
through proper stewardship and management.
Cleanup. DoD has identified 17,660 potentially
contaminated sites at 1,877 DoD installations and
6,786 formerly used defense sites (FUDS). Of
these, about 7,000 will require cleanup. DoD
estimates that nearly all sites have been identified
and that cleanup of the sites will be completed by
2011. Design and construction work was
expected to increase through 1998, and then to
moderate until all cleanup is completed. The most
common contaminants at DoD sites are:
petroleum products, solvents, metals, pesticides,
and paints. Some sites also contain more unusual
wastes, such as unexploded ordnance or low-level
radioactive materials.
Compliance. DoD must meet all regulatory
requirements established by law relating to air,
water, and land discharges. Many compliance
deadlines have been met with best-available but
costly technology; some operations continue
under temporary waivers. Experience suggests
that future regulations will likely be more
stringent, and compliance through emission
control will continue to be required, since it will
not be possible to eliminate all hazardous dis-
charge through pollution prevention strategies.
Pollution Prevention. DoD is required to reduce
waste streams through material substitution and
redesign of materials and processes that are
environmentally superior while continuing to be
functionally effective. The primary targets,
derived from the Toxic Release Inventory and
EPA's list of the 17 most toxic substances, are
volatile organic compounds, ozone depleting
substances, and hazardous/toxic materials.
Conservation. DoD must balance conflicting
demands of more space-intensive training on
diminishing military lands. Maintenance of
national infrastructure for flood control, naviga-
tion, and other Corps of Engineers national civil
works often result in competing uses for land
resources. Protecting coastal and marine resources
while conducting operations for military readiness
also presents challenges.
DoD, as "owners" of environmental problems,
and with both an interest in safeguarding the
public and the legal responsibility for its own
contamination, requires more effective and less
costly technologies to address environmental
security. DoD is interested in accelerating -
development and implementation of cost-effective
advanced technologies because it must provide
timely solutions for its mission-unique technology
needs and its other extensive, costly, complex,
and risky environmental needs.
DoD recognizes the need for competent in-house
people who know how to by smart technology
from academia, industry, or other agencies. Such
competence can be maintained only through
active pursuit of research and development in its
laboratories and centers and through simultaneous
pursuit of scientific understanding of issues, pro-
cesses, and continued advances in technology,
-------
DoD Problem Areas and Development Mission Objectives
Problem Definition
Development Objectives
CLEANUP
The remediation of soil, sediment, groundwater, surface
water, and structures contaminated with hazardous and toxic
materials from past military activities.
Provide new or improved cost effective methods to identify,
evaluate, treat, control, and mitigate past hazardous and
toxic materials disposal practices in three areas: site inves-
tigation/characterization; remediation; and environmental
contaminant and effects.
COMPLIANCE
EQ requirements relating to air, water, and land pollution
through the control, treatment, and disposal of solid and
hazardous wastes. Primary areas of emphasis are industrial
activities, solid and liquid discharges from ships, and envi-
ronmentally sound disposal of pyrotechnics, explosives, and
propellants.
Technologies for advanced end-of-pipe control, treatment,
and disposal of wastes to meet air, water, and land require-
ments. R&D is focused on characterization of pollutant and
waste behavior, media-specific control and treatment tech-
nologies, and monitoring and assessment tools to meet
existing and future national/international regulatory con-
straints otherwise inhibiting the DoD mission.
POLLUTION PREVENTION
Elimination and/or minimization of materials and materials
development processes that produce or release hazardous,
toxic, or excess wastes into the environment.
Technology in the form of materials, processes, and func-
tional products allowing the eventual elimination of the use
of VOC, ODC, and HAZMAT materials and processes in
DoD maintenance, overhaul, and remanufacture of new
weapons systems.
CONSERVATION
Maintaining optimum training, testing, and operational
mission effectiveness by stewardship and preservation of the
natural and cultural resources on DoD lands.
Enhanced and continued testing and training mission effec-
tiveness through effective management of ecological and
cultural resources diversity and productivity. Advanced
models and techniques for resource characterization/impact
analysis and improved mitigation and rehabilitation mea-
coupled with rigorous testing and evaluation
through an integrated research and development
program. Integration is provided through existing
mechanisms led by Defense laboratories' balance
of intramural and extramural activities.
DoD Environmental Quality RDT&E Process
DoD's EQ RD effort is primarily executed by the
Services through Civil & Environmental
Engineering, Combat Material, and Corporate
laboratories. These laboratories provide the
technical expertise to enable the Services to be
smart buyers and users of new and improved
technologies. Each laboratory generally performs
the environmental work required by the primary
weapon, platform, or installation mission it
supports. For example:
• The Air Force Research Laboratory's Airbase
and Environmental Technology Division and
the Naval Air Warfare Center share the lead
on environmental work for aviation and mari-
time aviation.
• The Naval Surface Warfare Center does envi-
ronmental RDT&E for ships in support of
NAVSEA, the acquisition and life-cycle
manager for surface weapons systems.
• The U.S. Army Engineer Waterways Exper-
iment Station (WES), where cleanup RD is
conducted, is under the command of Head-
quarters, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers,
which performs the cleanup program for the
Army.
In the continuous dialogue between the test and
evaluation communities, technology users, and
R&D producers, the laboratories and
Environmental Field Office help users to separate
the R&D requirement from needs that can be
addressed through existing and available
technology. User-stated requirements are cross-
checked for commonality by the Tri-Service
Project Reliance Joint Engineers' Panel teams for
the four environmental security mission pillars.
These pillars are comprised of R&D engineers
and scientists from each Service who also sit on
parallel teams of the interagency Strategic
-------
Environmental Research and Development
Program (SERDP) (see p. 18). The personnel on
the teams possess the subject matter expertise to
understand the technology, interpret the require-
ments to create balanced and focused joint
projects and evaluate technical program proposals
for inclusion in SERDP, the Environmental
Security Technology Certification Program
(ESTCP) (see p. 15), and other agency programs.
The teams provide for DoD inter-laboratory
integration and the leveraging of technical
concepts, programs, and talents to create projects
for innovative dual use technology, while
providing for DoD user requirements.
Laboratory personnel and pillar technology teams
play a key role in technology-shortfall need
identification and assisting field commands to
understand and solve urgent problems requiring
emerging technologies from any source.
Laboratory scientists and engineers communicate
their R&D accomplishments and DoD technology
needs to professional, trade, and academic forums
through scientific or technical papers and
numerous other exchanges. The research
engineers and scientists link their laboratories
with field users and external suppliers of science
and technology from industry, academia, and
other agencies. The communication interaction
that underlies the more formal and visible user
requirements development and approval processes
is the work of people who have ready access to
peer organizations, the private sector, and the
users who need their advice. They also have
access to industry and academia peers to facilitate
their understanding of DoD's specific needs and
constraints.
Defense Environmental Restoration
Program
DoD cleanup policy is determined centrally under
the Defense Environmental Restoration Program
(DERP). DERP includes two major components:
Other Hazardous Waste Operations (OHW) and
the Installation Restoration Program (IRP). Under
the IRP, DoD performs all required contaminated
site cleanups. Although policy direction and
oversight of IRP are responsibilities of the Deputy
Assistant Secretary of Defense, each Service
(Army, Navy, Air Force) is responsible for
program implementation.
DERP has specified procedures for evaluating
sites and procuring cleanup services under IRP
that follow EPA guidelines for site investigations
and remediation. These procedures cover all
phases of site operations, including preliminary
assessment/site inspection (PA/SI), remedial
investigation/feasibility study (RI/FS), and reme-
dial design/and remedial action (RD/RA).
Nearly all DoD assessment and remediation work
is done through contractors. Generally, there are
two types of contractors: those engaged in site
assessments and investigations (PA/SI through
RI/FS) and those that perform cleanups (RD/RA).
Contractors that work on PA/SIs and RI/FSs
seldom work on the RD/RA phase.
In selecting and designing remedies, DoD
officials coordinate with EPA Regional officials
to ensure that cleanup goals meet regulatory
requirements. Most contracting is done on an
installation-oriented basis, either through cen-
tralized contracting service centers or directly by
the installation. Although each Service follows
general procedures specified by DERP, each
procures its own services.
DoD spends approximately $15 million annually
on RTD&E, primarily to demonstrate promising
technologies. Technologies demonstrated include:
bioventing, in situ aerobic and anaerobic
bioremediation, monitored natural attenuation, in
situ and ex situ vapor extraction, in situ soil
venting, chemical detoxification of chlorinated
aromatic compounds, incineration of soil
contaminated with explosives, infrared thermal
destruction, low temperature thermal stripping,
thermal destruction, radio frequency thermal soil
decontamination, and composting of
explosives-contaminated soil.
-------
U.S. Army Defense Environmental
Restoration Program
The Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Army
(Environment, Safety and Occupational
Health) (DASA(ESOH)) is responsible for
overall policy and guidance for the Army's
Installation Restoration Program for active
installations, the Base Realignment and
Closure (BRAC) Environmental Program for
closing installations, and is the Executive
Agent for the DoD Formerly Used Defense
Sites Program (FUDS). The Assistant Chief of
Staff for Installation Management (ACSIM)
has Army Staff responsibility for all three
programs, and programs and budgets
resources necessary to support them. The U. S.
Army Environmental Center (USAEC) is
responsible for program management of the
IRP to include program, fiscal and technical
oversight. USAEC provides funding guidance
and subsequent resources to support the
MACOM developed annual and multiyear IRP
workplans and monitors and evaluates
MACOM performance against the funded
requirements. The ACSEVI centrally manages
the Army BRAC program, with oversight
assistance from USAEC. MACOMs are
responsible for program execution of the IRP
and BRAC programs, but the U.S. Army
Corps of Engineers (USAGE) performs most
phases of project execution on a reimbursable
basis. USAGE is also responsible for program
management and proj ect execution for FUDS,
which include formerly used properties from
all the DoD components.
U.S. Air Force Major Commands
The Air Force IRP is decentralized. It is executed
by the Air Force Major Commands. Each may
obtain specialized technical support from
contractors in one of three ways: through task-
order contracts administered by five contract
service centers; through individual contracts
issued by the commands themselves; or by
individual installations. Much of the Air Force's
restoration work is conducted by the Army Corps
of Engineers. In the future, the Air Force plans to
issue contracts for this work.
U.S. Navy Facilities Engineering Command
The Navy Facilities Engineering Command
(NAVFAC) manages the Navy IRP. Day-to-day
operations of the IRP are conducted by ten field
divisions that operate within distinct geographical
boundaries. The majority of the IRP work is
conducted by support contractors under two
distinct contract mechanisms, each managed by
the field divisions:
• Comprehensive Long-Term Environmental
Action Navy (CLEAN) contracts for procur-
ing remedial study and design services.
• Remedial Action Contracts (RACs) for
procuring remedial cleanup services.
Army Environmental Quality Technology
Process
The Army Environmental Quality Technology
(EQT) Process was created in 1997 by the
Assistant Secretary of the Army (ASA) for
Acquisitions, Logistics, and Technology (ALT)
and the ASA (IE) as a parallel to the Defense
Systems Acquisition Management Process. The
Army Environmental Requirements and
Technology Assessments (AERTA) process
closely parallels the Mission Needs Statement
(MNS) Generation Process of the Defense System
Acquisition Management System. The four
distinct phases of the MNS Process can also apply
to the AERTA process: definition,
documentation, validation, and approval.
• Definition Phase: This activity defines,
describes, and justifies the need for an
environmental technology to solve a user
problem or satisfy a deficiency.
• Documentation Phase: This phase is the
formal preparation and review of the draft
user requirements under the AERTA process
by Assistant Chief of Staff for Installation
Management (ACSIM)/Office of the Director
-------
of Environmental Programs (ODEP)/U.S.
Army Environmental Center.
• Validation/Approval Phase: This is the
formal review process of the user
requirements, with their respective
performance criteria and metrics, by the
Army user community, including
representatives of the MACOMs, and
appropriate Army agencies (e.g., DCSOPS,
ASA(ALT)) to confirm and prioritize the
needs. Review and final recommendation of
the draft user requirements rests with the
Army MACOMs and other agencies, as
appropriate. Validation authority rests with
the ACSIM. Approval is a formal sanction
that the validation process is complete and the
identified user needs described in the
documentation are valid. An approved memo
is sent by the ACSIM to the ASA(ALT).
• Execution Phase: The Army's laboratories
and Technology Teams (TTs) implement and
monitor the technology program plans.
The AERTA is the central repository for the
Army's identified, quantified, and validated
environmental technology requirements,
associated potential off-the-shelf technology
solutions, and points of contact. Potential off-the-
shelf solutions are neither validated nor
recommended—only identified.
The AERTA structure allows for maximum
summary information, located in the "requirement
report" and the "tech assessment" pages, to be
viewed on one page with links to more detailed
information. Additional detailed information can
be obtained from points of contact located in the
requirement report and the technology assessment
webpages.
The regulatory climate directing the Army's
environmental technology program changes every
year. This requires monitoring of the laboratories'
programs, knowledge of technological
advancements inside and outside of the Army,
and refocusing of the RDT&E programs from
time to time. AERTA provides the framework for
documenting current information on the Army's
needs, off-the-shelf technologies available, and
the RDT&E program.
-------
U.S. Department of Energy Cleanup Programs
Environmental Restoration Program Needs
DOE's Environmental Restoration Program is
responsible for cleaning up 110 major installa-
tions and other locations. DOE estimates that
remediation may be required at about 4,000 of its
contaminated areas or sites. Most sites have been
used for nuclear weapons research, development,
and production. DOE installations tend to be
much larger than non-DOE sites. Twenty-three
DOE sites are listed on the Superfund National
Priorities List.
Key considerations of DOE's Environmental
Restoration program include the following:
• Most of the DOE cleanup effort occurs at 64
installations managed under the Remedial
Actions Program.
• Some contaminants at DOE installations are
unique to nuclear production, while others are
common to more typical industrial processes.
Mixed waste (containing both radioactive and
non-radioactive constituents) is a widespread
problem.
• The Decontamination and Decommissioning
Program will involve up to 1,000 facilities.
This program manages retired government-
owned facilities such as reactors, laboratories,
buildings, and storage tanks.
• DOE conducts research and development,
primarily in the form of demonstrations of
technologies such as in situ bioremediation,
air stripping, vitrification, soil washing,
solvent extraction, solar detoxification, and
above-ground biological treatment.
Contractors perform virtually all cleanup and
restoration work at DOE installations. DOE
awards remedial action contracts on a site-by-site
basis. These contracts are managed by DOE's
Operations Offices. Depending on the site,
contractors may be responsible for management
tasks, actual cleanup work, waste management
duties, or various combinations. For example,
contractors are responsible for day-to-day proj ect
management under Environmental Restoration
Management Contracts (ERMCs) awarded at the
Hanford and Fernald sites. ERMC contractors
have the option of performing remedial investiga-
tion/feasibility studies themselves and are
responsible for subcontracting remaining work to
companies with specialized expertise and
technology.
DOE has begun to implement a number of
contract reforms that emphasize performance-
based approaches and risk sharing, provide
incentives for Managing and Operations (M&O)
contractors for cost-reduction and safety
measures, and identify tasks that should be
undertaken by qualified subcontractors. The first
two integrated management contracts awarded
under the new system have been multi-year
efforts for management and cleanup of the Idaho
National Engineering Laboratory and Rocky Flats
sites.
Environmental Technology Development
Programs and Services
DOE provides a range of programs and services
to assist universities, industry, and other private
sector organizations and individuals interested in
developing or applying environmental technolo-
gies. Working with DOE Operations Offices, as
well as management and operating contractors,
DOE/Environmental Management (EM) employs
a number of mechanisms to identify, integrate,
develop, and adapt promising emerging
technologies. These mechanisms include
collaborative arrangements, procurement
provisions, licensing of technologies, consulting
arrangements, reimbursable work for industry,
and special consideration for small business.
EM awards grants and cooperative agreements if
51% or more of the value of the effort is related to
a public interest goal. Such goals include
-------
advancement of present/future U.S. capabilities in
domestic and international environmental cleanup
markets, technology transfer, advancement of
scientific knowledge, or education and training of
individuals and businesses.
The Industry and University Programs Area (see
p. 22) is a primary DOE vehicle for funding
research and development partnerships with the
public and private sectors to introduce new
technologies into the programs managed by
DOE's Office of Science and Technology.
DOE uses several mechanisms under the above
Programs Area and otherwise to invite the private
sector to participate in its technology research and
development programs. These include
Cooperative Research and Development
Agreements (CRADAs) for collaborative R&D
with non-federal partners, and procurements for
technology development under Program Research
and Development Announcements (PROAs) (see
p. 22) and Research Opportunity Announcements
(ROAs) (see p. 22). The Small Business Technol-
ogy Transfer Program (see p. 14) is a special pro-
gram through which small businesses may
participate in the above programs. DOE also is
one of 11 federal agencies involved in the Small
Business Innovation Research Program, adminis-
tered by the Small Business Administration (see
p. 14).
CRADAs are agreements between a DOE or other
federal R&D laboratory and any non-federal
source to conduct cooperative R&D that is
consistent with the laboratory's mission. The
partner may provide funds, facilities, people, or
other resources. DOE provides the partner with
access to facilities and expertise; external
participants receive no federal funds. Rights to
inventions and other intellectual property are
negotiated between the laboratory and the
participant.
PRO As are program announcements that solicit a
broad mix of advanced development and
demonstration proposals. A PRDA requests
proposals for a wide range of technical solutions
to specific EM problem areas. Multiple awards,
which may have distinct approaches or concepts,
are generally made.
The ROA seeks advanced research and technol-
ogies for a broad scope of cleanup needs and
supports applied research ranging from concept
feasibility to full-scale testing. Each ROA is open
continuously for a full year following the date of
issue and includes a partial procurement set-aside
for small businesses.
Developers and vendors of innovative technolo-
gies interested in more information about DOE's
technology development efforts should contact
the DOE's Center for Environmental Manage-
ment Information, toll-free, at 800-736-3282.
Technology Focus Areas
DOE recognizes that DOE cleanups provide an
opportunity for developers of innovative tech-
nologies. DOE's technology-related research and
development activities target five focus areas that
represent key remediation and waste management
problems within the DOE complex. Five areas for
the development of cross-cutting technologies
also have been established.
Each focus area includes specific categories of
technologies that require research and develop-
ment. These are:
Subsurface Contaminants Focus Area, which
is developing technologies to address
environmental problems associated with
hazardous and radioactive contaminants in soil
and groundwater that exist throughout the DOE
complex, including radionuclides, heavy metals,
and dense, nonaqueous phase liquids. Numerous
contaminant plumes have contaminated soil and
groundwater. Some of these contaminants have
migrated from the numerous landfills at DOE
facilities, and SCFA is responsible for supplying
technologies for the remediation of radioactive
and hazardous buried waste, as well as for
developing new or alternative technologies for in
situ stabilization and nonintrusive
characterization of these sites. Technology
developed within this specialty area will provide
-------
effective methods to contain contaminant plumes
and innovative technologies for remediating
contaminated soils and groundwater, with
emphasis on in situ technologies to minimize
waste disposal costs and potential worker
exposure.
Mixed Waste Characterization, Treatment,
and Disposal Focus Area, which planned to
conduct a minimum of three pilot-scale demon-
strations of mixed waste treatment systems, using
actual mixed waste, by 1997.
Radioactive Tank Waste Remediation Focus
Area, which has concentrated on four DOE
installations where most DOE underground
storage tanks are located.
Facility Deactivation, Decontamination and
Material Disposal Focus Area, which is in the
process of selecting a site for a full-scale dem-
onstration of facility decommissioning technology
with an emphasis on the recycling of con-
taminated building materials for reuse within the
DOE complex.
Cross-cutting technologies are defined as those
which overlap the boundaries of focus areas, and
technologies developed in these areas will be used
in focus area testing and evaluation programs
wherever they are applicable. These areas are:
Characterization, Monitoring, and Sensor
Technology; Efficient Separations and
Processing; Robotics; Innovative Investment; and
Pollution Prevention.
-------
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Cleanup Programs
Hazardous Waste Cleanup Sites
The Superfund program for the cleanup of closed
or abandoned hazardous waste sites is adminis-
tered by EPA under the Comprehensive Envi-
ronmental Response, Compensation, and Liability
Act (CERCLA). Since 1980, the primary re-
sponsibility for site cleanups has shifted from
EPA to responsible parties. Currently, nearly 75%
of all cleanups are implemented by responsible
parties, with EPA or state oversight.
Superfund emphasizes remedies that include the
use of hazardous waste treatment technologies.
The use of innovative technologies for Superfund
cleanup has been increasing. Innovative treatment
technologies currently account for more than half
of the treatment technologies selected for control-
ling waste sources.
EPA has an active research and demonstration
program for innovative cleanup technologies.
EPA's primary mechanisms for promotion of
innovative technologies for site remediation are
testing/verification programs, including the
Superfund Innovative Technology Evaluation
(SITE) Program (see p. 27) and the Environ-
mental Technology Verification (ETV) Program
(see p. 25). EPA sponsors other interagency tech-
nology development programs and initiatives.
Remedies have not yet been selected for hundreds
of sites on the NPL. In addition, EPA estimates
that 80% of future sites—including those on the
National Priorities List (NPL) and others—will
require remediation of contaminated ground
water, 74% will require soil remediation, 15%
sediments remediation, and 10% sludge treat-
ment. The data available on these sites indicate
the types and extent of treatment technology
applications needed in the future:
• Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) are the
most common contaminants, followed by
metals and semi-volatile organic compounds.
• Chlorinated VOCs are the most common
organic contaminant, followed by other
VOCs, PCBs, PAHs, and phenols.
• The most common metal is lead, followed by
chromium, arsenic, and cadmium.
Based on contaminant occurrence and historical
technology trends, some general observations can
be made about the potential Superfund market for
specific technologies. These observations do not
necessarily consider several other important
factors in remedy selection, such as federal and
state cleanup standards, competing technologies,
other site characteristics, and public acceptance.
• Based on current trends, at least 30% of the
Superfund sites will implement innovative
technologies for some degree of source
control. Innovative technology use should
grow as more cost and performance data
become available.
• The use of soil vapor extraction (SVE)
technologies for all types of VOCs is
expected to continue at current levels, and
may even increase.
• Thermal desorption for the treatment of
VOCs and PCBs may increase.
• The selection of bioremediation at Superfund
sites may increase.
• Alternatives to incineration for the treatment
of semi-volatile organic compounds (SVOCs)
are in demand.
• Treatment of metals in soil represents a
potentially large, but untapped market for
innovative treatment.
• New in situ ground water treatment technol-
ogies are in great demand. Pump-and-treat
technologies often cannot achieve desired
cleanup goals.
10
-------
RCRA Corrective Action Sites
Approximately 5,100 hazardous waste treatment,
storage, and disposal facilities (TSDFs) may be
subject to corrective action under the Resource
Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Facility
owners or operators are responsible for the
necessary corrective action, with oversight by
EPA or a state.
Between 1,500 and 3,500 of the regulated TSDFs
will require corrective action. A wide variety of
wastes, many of which are similar to those found
at Superfund sites, will require corrective action.
Some of the most prevalent wastes include
corrosive and ignitable wastes, heavy metals,
organic solvents, electroplating waste, and waste
oil.
About half of all RCRA corrective action facili-
ties use off-site disposal remedies and half use
innovative treatment. Of the innovative technol-
ogies, about one-third are SVE; one-third in situ
bioremediation; and one-third above-ground treat-
ment, primarily bioremediation.
Underground Storage Tank Sites
Underground storage tanks (USTs) containing
petroleum products or hazardous chemicals are
also regulated under RCRA. Tank owners are
responsible for remediation under state UST
programs. Major factors concerning UST site
remediation include the following:
• As of 1995, approximately 306,000 UST sites
require cleanup. Of these, 131,000 sites have
completed cleanups, leaving approximately
170,000 sites requiring some level of cleanup.
An additional 100,000 releases were expected
by 2000. There is an average of almost three
tanks per site. Per site cleanup costs range
from $10,000 to $125,000 for soil remediat-
ion and $100,000 to $1 million for ground
water remediation. At an average cost of
$125,000, the potential UST market could
reach $34 billion.
• Approximately 98% of USTs contain petro-
leum products and 2% contain hazardous
materials.
• About 68% of UST cleanups use innovative
technology. For sites contaminated with
petroleum, landfilling is used most frequently
at sites (one-third), followed by natural
attenuation, biopiles, soil vacuum extraction,
landfarming, and thermal desorption. For
sites with ground water contamination,
natural attenuation is the most common
remedy, followed by pump-and-treat, air
sparging, and in situ bioremediation.
11
-------
FEDERAL SITE REMEDIATION
TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT
ASSISTANCE PROGRAMS
12
-------
Interagency R&D Assistance Programs
Rapid Commercialization Initiative
Coordinating Agency: U.S. Department of Commerce
Participating Agencies: U.S. Department of Defense, U.S. Department of Energy, U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, California EPA, Western Governors' Association, Southern
States Energy Board
The Rapid Commercialization Initiative (RCI), an interagency effort coordinated by the U.S. Department
of Commerce, fosters cooperative interaction of the private sector, states, and Federal agencies to help bring
environmental technologies to market more rapidly and efficiently. RCI acts as a gateway to other federal
agency programs that provide opportunities for environmental technology demonstration, verification, and
transfer. RCI provides in-kind assistance for selected companies with commercially ready environmental
technologies in four categories: avoidance, control, monitoring and assessment, and remediation and resto-
ration.
The primary goal of RCI is to provide services to industry that help lower three key barriers to
commercialization:
(1) finding sites for full-scale technology demonstrations;
(2) evaluating and verifying technical performance and the cost of performance of technologies; and,
(3) promoting regulatory acceptance of verified data and expediting the permitting process.
The selection of technologies for participation in RCI programs centers on two criteria:
• The technology addresses environmental and market needs, with a focus on solutions to private
sector needs and added consideration for application to public sector environmental problems.
• There is a clear path to commercialization and the technology is only a few, final steps from
commercialization, such that testing, evaluation, and verification will complete the process.
Marketing, financing, or production assistance are not available under RCI. Exemptions from federal laws
and regulations also are not available. Participants in RCI are selected through program announcements and
an intensive peer-review process that examines both technical and business soundness.
Contact: Stanley Chanesman
U.S. Department of Commerce
H4418
Washington, DC 20230
202-482-08250
Website: http://rci.gnet.org/
13
-------
Small Business Innovative Research Program/Small Business
Technology Transfer Research Program
Coordinating Agency: U.S. Small Business Administration
Participating Agencies: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, U.S. Department of Energy, U.S.
Department of Defense, others
The Small Business Innovative Research (SBIR) Program is a multi-media assistance program designed to
assist and promote U.S.-owned high technology companies with 500 or fewer employees. SBIR activities
are overseen by the Small Business Administration. Funding is provided to companies through grants and
contracts awarded by SBIR program offices in 11 Federal agencies. Each agency offers at least one SBIR
program solicitation annually that specifies the types of research to be funded.
SBIR is a three-step grant and contract program. Phase I grants and contracts are awarded in amounts of
$60,000 to $100,000 each for technology feasibility studies that can last up to six months. Only Phase I
recipients are eligible for Phase II awards. Phase II grants and contracts can last from one to two years of
principal research and development, and range from $150,000 to $750,000. Phase III funding assistance is
provided either through commercial application with additional funding from the private sector, or through
non-SBIR funding provided by the participating agency for research and development in areas of particular
interest to the agency.
The Small Business Technology Transfer Program (STTR) expands funding opportunities in the federal
innovation research and development arena. Under STTR, a specific percentage of federal R&D funding
for five agencies (including DoD and DOE) is reserved for awards to small business and nonprofit research
institution partners. These agencies designate R&D topics and accept proposals. Small businesses must meet
certain eligibility criteria (similar to SBIR) to participate in the STTR Program.
Following submission of proposals, agencies make STTR awards based on small business/nonprofit research
institution qualification, degree of innovation, and future market potential. Small businesses that receive
awards or grants then begin a three-phase program. Phase I is the start-up phase, with awards of up to
$100,000 for approximately one year fund the exploration of the scientific, technical, and commercial
feasibility of an idea or technology. Phase II awards of up to $500,000 are awarded for as long as two years,
for projects that expand on Phase I results. During this period, the R&D work is performed and the
developer begins to consider commercial potential. Only Phase I award winners are considered for Phase
II. Phase III is the period during which Phase II innovation moves from the laboratory into the marketplace.
No STTR funds support this phase. The small business must find funding in the private sector or other
non-STTR federal agency funding.
Contact: U.S. Small Business Administration
Office of Technology
409 Third Street, SW
Washington, DC 20416
202-205-6450
Website: http://www.sba.gov/SBIR/
14
-------
U.S. Department of Defense R&D Assistance Programs
Air Force Center for Environmental Excellence
The Air Force Center for Environmental Excellence (AFCEE) has an Innovative Technology Program that
identifies and field tests innovative site characterization, remediation, and pollution prevention technologies,
with an emphasis on technologies that save time and money and facilitate compliance with air, soil, and
water regulations.
Special areas of interest within the Innovative Technology Program include:
• remediation technologies to treat fuels, chlorinated solvents, pesticides, PCBs, and heavy metals;
• vapor phase capture and treatment;
• cost effective site characterization;
• stripping and removal of protective coatings;
• parts cleaning and degreasing; and
• industrial process sludge treatment.
Successful proj ects have been based on sound scientific principles and offer widespread applicability to Air
Force sites and significant cost savings.
Contact: Mary Urey
Air Force Center for Environmental Excellence (AFCEE)
Technology Transfer Division
8001 Arnold Drive
Brooks AFB, TX 78235-5357
210-536-4419
Website: http://www.afcee.brooks.af.mil
Environmental Security Technology Certification Program
ESTCP' s goal is to demonstrate and validate promising, innovative technologies that target the Department
of Defense's (DoD's) most urgent environmental needs. These technologies provide a return on investment
through cost savings and improved efficiency. ESTCP's strategy is to select lab-proven technologies with
broad DoD and market application. These proj ects are aggressively moved to the field for rigorous trials that
document their cost, performance, and market potential. To ensure that the demonstrated technologies have
a real impact, ESTCP incorporates these players in the development and execution of each technology.
ESTCP demonstrations—
• address real DoD environmental needs.
• significantly reduce costs and risks and expedite implementation.
• document and validate the cost and performance of new technologies for DoD end-users and the
regulatory community.
15
-------
The ESTCP Process (below) ensures approved technologies meet DoD environmental challenges:
• DoD environmental requirements are specified.
• ESTCP requests proposals.
• Rigorous and expert scientific reviews are made.
• ESTCP projects are selected in cleanup, compliance, and pollution prevention.
• Technologies are demonstrated and evaluated at DoD sites.
• Cost and performance data are validated.
• Effective and affordable technologies are transferred across DoD.
Contact: Dr. Jeffrey Marqusee
Director, ESTCP
901 North Stuart Street, Suite 303
Arlington, VA 22203
PHONE: 703-696-2117
FAX: 703-696-2114
E-MAIL: estcp@estcp.org
Website: www.estcp.org
National Environmental Technology Test Sites (NETTS) Program
The National Environmental Technology Test Sites (NETTS) Program sponsored by the Strategic
Environmental Research and Development Program (SERDP), is an environmental technology testing
and evaluation program that provides locations, facilities, and support for applied research
demonstration, and evaluation of innovative cleanup and characterization technologies that are
candidates for Installation Restoration efforts at DoD facilities. NETTS, which is managed under the
SERDP Cleanup Program, promotes technology transfer from research to proof-of principle
demonstration and facilitates expeditious transfer of technologies between government agencies and the
private sector.
There are currently four DoD SERDP NETTS test sites and one NETTS technology support center that
primarily focus on the proof-of-principle demonstrations of cleanup technologies. They consist of:
• Dover NETTS Test Site: The Dover National Test Site (DNTS) at Dover AFB provides sites
where research can be conducted on the transport, detection, monitoring, and cleanup of solvent
and fuel contaminants in the subsurface. DNTS provides a unique opportunity for conducting
experimental, contained releases of dense nonaqueous phase liquids (DNAPLs). DNTS also
provides other well-characterized contaminated plume sites and support services.
• McClellan NETTS Test Site: The Air Force also manages a Chlorinated Hydrocarbon Remedial
Demonstration Site at McClellan AFB, which provides areas to evaluate investigative
technologies and remediation technologies for chlorinated hydrocarbon contamination in soil
and groundwater.
• Naval Facilities Engineering Service Center NETTS Test Site: The Environmental Technology
Demonstration Site at Port Hueneme, California, provides in situ and ex situ locations to
demonstrate advanced fuel hydrocarbon remediation technologies for treatment of Navy specific
fuels contamination in soil and groundwater. Areas include a soil stockpile facility
16
-------
contaminated with fuels; underground storage tank and spill areas; an 11-acre gasoline station
plume; and a 43-acre MTBE plume associated with the gasoline station site.
• Former Wurtsmith AFB NETTS Test Site: The National Center for Integrated Bioremediation
Research and Development at Wurtsmith AFB, Michigan, co-sponsored by EPA and the
University of Michigan, operates a controlled field test-bed facility for investigations to support
the design and engineering of integrated bioremediation systems. This project focuses on in situ
bioremediation of surface soils, subsoils, surface water, and groundwater contaminated by fuels,
solvents and other organic substances.
Contact: SERDP Cleanup Program Manager
Dr. Catherine Vogel
SERDP Program Office
901 N. Stuart Street, Suite 303
Arlington, VA 22203
703-696-2118
E-MAIL: vogelc@acq.osd.mil
Individual Test Locations:
Dover National Test Site
Tim McHale
P.O. Box 02063
909 Arnold Drive Extension
Dover AFB, DE 19902-6600
PHONE: 302-677-4103
FAX: 302-677-4100
E-MAIL: tim.mchale@af.mil
McClellan AFB National Test Site
LimLu
SM-ALC/EMR
5050 Dudley Blvd., Suite 3
McClellan AFB, CA 95652-1389
PHONE: 916-643-0830 ext. 466
FAX: 916-643-0827/5880
E-MAIL: jim.lu@mclellan.af.mil
Navy Port Hueneme National Test Site
Ernest Lory
Naval Facilities Engineering Service Center,
ESC 411
560 Center Drive
Port Hueneme, CA 93043
PHONE: 805-982-1299
FAX: 805-982-5226
E-MAIL: elory@nfesc.navy.mil
Former Wurtsmith AFB National Test Site
Dr. Mike Barcelona
Department of Civil and Environmental
Engineering
Room 1221,1ST Building
University of Michigan, North Campus
220 Bonisteel Boulevard
Ann Arbor, MI 48109-2099
PHONE: 734-763-6512/9666
FAX: 734-763-6513
E-MAIL: mikebar@engin.umich.edu
Website: http://www.serdp.org
17
-------
Naval Environmental Leadership Program
The Naval Environmental Leadership Program (NELP) seeks to expedite cleanup and compliance at the
Naval Air Station North Island, San Diego, California, and Naval Station Mayport, Jacksonville, Florida,
using innovative technologies and focused management. The two NELP bases serve as prototypes for
identification, development, testing, implementation, evaluation, and refinement of new initiatives and
export of successful applications for implementation as part of the Navy's Environmental Management
Program.
Interested public or private sector parties with innovative technologies that may be implemented at full-
scale to address environmental problems at the two NELP bases and that address problems of concern in
the Navy-wide environmental management program may be eligible to participate in NELP. Innovative
technologies are selected and included in the program through a variety of mechanisms. The NELP
Initiative solicits proposals for innovative technologies via the Commerce Business Daily.
NELP emphasizes full-scale technology implementation to solve an environmental problem at one of the
NELP bases. It is not an R&D program; however, the NELP Initiative may serve as a host for technology
demonstrations if the developer requires a demonstration site, once the NELP base meets the
requirements for a successful demonstration, and funding is provided by the developer or other source.
Successful demonstrations will lead to full-scale implementation at the NELP base and within the
execution of the Navy's Installation Restoration Program.
Contact: Naval Facilities Engineering Command
Washington Navy Yard
Building 33
901 M Street SE
Washington, DC 20374
Website: http://www.nasni.navy.mil/nelp/
Strategic Environmental Research and Development Program
Coordinating Agency: U.S. Department of Defense
Participating Agencies: U.S. Department of Energy, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
The Strategic Environmental Research and Development Program (SERDP) is a multiagency program
funded through the Department of Defense. SERDP responds to environmental needs of DoD, along
with those it shares with the Department of Energy, the Environmental Protection Agency, and other
federal government agencies.
SERDP seeks to identify, develop, demonstrate, and transition technology for four thrust areas. The four
thrust areas correspond to the four pillars of DoD's Environmental Quality Program: including
environmental cleanup technology. The cleanup technology thrust area focuses on conducting research
and development to achieve more effective and efficient environmental characterization, assessment,
monitoring, and cleanup of soil, sediment, groundwater, surface water, and structures contaminated by
past defense practices with hazardous materials (including unexploded ordnance), and toxic substances.
The cleanup technology area also seeks to:
18
-------
• develop cost-effective methods to determine fate, transport, and effects of contaminants related
to defense activities;
• develop risk-based modeling methods for establishing cleanup priorities; and
• facilitate transfer of technology to field use by means of the proof-of-principle demonstration of
R&D projects, particularly at the SERDP National Environmental Technology Test Sites.
On an annual basis, SERDP solicits proposals from the federal and private sector in the areas of site
characterization, monitoring, remediation, and risk assessment. Each year, specific statements of needs
are issued. For current topics of interest and information on how to become involved, please see the
SERDP web site.
Contact: Dr. Catherine Vogel
SERDP Program Office
901 N. Stuart Street, Suite 303
Arlington, VA 22203
703-696-2118
E-MAIL: vogelc@acq.osd.mil
Website: http://www.serdp.org
Unexploded Ordnance Technology Demonstration Program
The Congressionally funded Unexploded Ordnance (UXO) Technology Demonstration Program has
established technology performance baselines by demonstrating and highlighting the strengths and
capabilities of numerous UXO technologies.
The U.S. Army Environmental Center, in partnership with the Naval Explosive Ordnance Disposal
Technology Division, has conducted over 76 demonstrations of UXO detection and remediation
technology. Phase I, Phase II and Phase III were conducted in 1994, 1995 and 1996 at the U.S. Army
Jefferson Proving Ground in Madison, Indiana. These demonstrations were performed on a controlled
test site containing a known baseline of emplaced, inert ordnance.
Additional technology demonstrations were conducted during 1995 at five sites throughout the United
States that contained live ordnance. JPG Phase IV demonstrations, which focused on discrimination
technologies, were conducted in FY98/99. The JPG Program has been structured to demonstrate and
evaluate systems, which are used for detection, identification and remediation of UXO.
The primary objective of te UXO demonstration program is to evaluate, establish, and advance UXO
technology performance. Prior to this, no broad technology performance baseline existed. A framework
has been established to better understand and assess UXO technology. Additionally, program
demonstrators have benefitted from target data feedback that has enabled them to better undertake or
continue system improvements—and successful performance at JPG has been an effective marketing
tool. The primary focus of the Phase IV effort was to document state-of-the-art for discrimination and
classification techniques.
19
-------
Results of the Phase III demonstrations show that overall technology detection rates have improved since
the initial Phase I Demonstration Program (1994) and that state-of-the-art prototype technology is
capable of detecting over 95% of emplaced ordnance. However, significant technology limitations still
exist.
The Phase IV efforts have documented the baseline capabilities and limitations of current technologies
for target discrimination. Current technologies have limited capabilities to efficiently discriminate
ordnance from non-ordnance. However, the groundwork has been laid to develop this capability in the
future. The combined capabilities to detect, discriminate, and remediate will significantly reduce the
overall cost of UXO clearance by reducing the number of anomalies, which must be dug.
Details of the multi-phase demonstration programs can be found in published reports. The most recent
document is entitled, UXO Technology Demonstration Program at Jefferson proving Ground, Phase III,
April 1997. The Phase IV report will be available Spring 2000. These reports and additional information
can be obtained by contacting USAEC's hotline, or by e-mail.
Contact: U.S. Army Environmental Hotline
(800) USA-3845, DSN 585-1699
Website: http://aec. army.mil/prod/usaec/et/uxo/j pgfs.htm
U.S. Army Environmental Center
The U.S. Army Environmental Center (USAEC) is a field operating agency of the Department of
the Army Headquarters. USAEC provides the tools and programs that prepare soldiers,
installation, major commands and Army Headquarters to protect readiness and quality of life
through sound environmental stewardship. USAEC's skilled team includes professionals in
engineering, physical science, technology, chemistry, biology, geology, archeology, history,
safety, health, law, resource management, information systems and public affairs. USAEC also
works with Army, government, public and private-sector experts to provide cost-effective
support for military environmental programs.
The U.S. Army Environmental Center's commitment to stewardship contributes directly to the
Army's ability to achieve its mission goals—whether it is devising innovative ways to sustain
training areas, helping installations prevent pollution or developing cost-effective strategies for
meeting environmental compliance requirements. USAEC's pollution prevention programs help
major commands and installation invest in new ways to protect resources, meet environmental
requirements and maintain readiness.
USAEC's environmental technology demonstration and transfer programs provide the innovative
tools of tomorrow to the hands of today's Army. These initiatives enable the Army to test and
implement cost-effective technologies in pollution prevention, conservation, compliance and
restoration. To support these efforts, USAEC maintains the database for environmental
technologies requirements and is responsible for the transfer of emerging technologies to meet
Army installations' requirements. USAEC administers technical demonstrations of technologies
resulting from research in Army laboratories and the private sector.
20
-------
The focus of Army technology investments and the technology transfer efforts of USAEC is on
Army- or military-unique research requirements. For example, Army restoration research and
development and technology transfer efforts currently focus primarily on unexploded ordnance
and explosives compounds technologies.
USAEC looks closely at range activities and devises ways we can be better stewards of this land
so the Army can continue to use these valuable areas well into the 21st century. Partnerships
between the Army's environmental, training and materiel-development communities apply the
latest pollution prevention, compliance and conversation techniques to range operations.
USAEC's restoration oversight managers work with major commands and installations to find
practical and cost-effective solutions to cleanup challenges—devising ways to protect people and
the environment while saving resources and ensuring Army readiness.
Contact
Mr. James I Arnold, Jr.
U.S. Army Environmental Center
ATTN: SFJM-AEC-ET
5179HoadleyRoad
APG, MD 21010-5401
Phone 1-800-USA-3845
Fax 410-436-6836
E-Mail: t2hotline@aec.apgea.army.mil
Website: http://aec.army.mil
21
-------
U.S. Department of Energy R&D Assistance Programs
Industry and University Programs Area
The mission of the Industry and University Programs Area is to identify and provide development support
for technologies that show promise in addressing DOE's Environmental Management (EM) needs, but
require proof-of-principle experimentation and already proven technologies in other fields that require
critical path experimentation to demonstrate feasibility for adaptation to specific EM needs.
The underlying obj ective is to ensure that private industry, other Federal agencies, and universities are maj or
participants in developing and deploying new and emerging technologies. Tools used to achieve this
objective include Program Research and Development Announcements (PRDAs, see p. 22), Research
Opportunity Announcements (ROAs, see p. 22), Cooperative Research and Development Agreements
(CRADAs), other grants, and inter-agency agreements (lAGs).
Contact: Jeffrey Walker
U.S. Department of Energy
19901 Germantown Road
Germantown, MD 20874-1290
301-903-7966
301-903-7457 fax
Program Research & Development Announcements/Research
Opportunity Announcements
Program R&D Announcements (PRDAs) and Research Opportunity Announcements (ROAs) are DOE's
major assistance vehicles for developing technologies. PRDAs solicit abroad mix of proposals where R&D,
including demonstration, testing, and evaluation, is required within broadly defined areas of interest. DOE
may issue a PRDA in response to an individual program need, such as the cleanup of a particular
contaminant at a specific site. Multiple awards for proposals, which may have varied approaches or
concepts, generally are made. Numerous PRDAs may be issued each year.
ROAs solicit industry and academic proposals throughout the year ("rolling admissions") for potential
contracts in applied research. ROAs support research efforts for the development of technologies with poten-
tial application in the EM program. A proposed technology should improve DOE's capabilities in areas such
as in situ remediation; detection, characterization, and monitoring; efficient separations technology for
radioactive waste; and robotics. ROAs are published in the Commerce Business Daily. The program includes
some set-asides for small businesses. DOE anticipates making 25-30 awards through an active ROA at its
Morgantown facility.
For information on the full range of DOE/EM assistance programs, contact the EM Central Point of Contact
(CPOC). The CPOC is a referral service that expedites and monitors private sector interaction with EM. The
CPOC can identify links between technologies and program needs and connect potential partners with an
extensive network of Headquarters and field program contacts.
Developers can gain more information on DOE's business and research opportunities by obtaining the U.S.
Department of Energy Environmental Cleanup Technology Development Program Business and Research
Opportunities Guide (DOE/EM-0115P). The Guide can be obtained from the National Technical Informa-
22
-------
tion Service (NTIS, see p. 31).
Contact: EM Central Point of Contact
U.S. Department of Energy
19901 Germantown Road
Germantown, MD 20874-1290
800-845-2096
301-903-7238 fax
For information on ROA awards through the Morgantown Energy Technology Center:
Contact: Thomas Martin
304-291-4087
Tech Con
TechCon is a DOE program developed to increase the use of commercially available technologies at DOE
cleanup sites with an emphasis on technologies that have shown superior performance characteristics.
TechCon's mission is to identify, screen, and support the implementation of available environmental
technologies from both the private and public sector in the U.S., as well as from international sources.
The TechCon Program works with sites to identify clean-up needs, finds commercially available
technologies and services that have proven performance capabilities, matches technologies to needs at DOE
sites, and delivers information on these technologies to site personnel. By connecting representatives of
technology companies with those at remediation sites, TechCon promotes the use of available technologies
and resolves barriers to their field application.
A key to TechCon's success is improving communication among companies, site representatives, and
regulators. To that end, TechCon has instituted an e-mail discussion list that is hosted at the Argonne
National Laboratory. With over 60 members, including DOE, EPA, and site-contractor and technology-
company personnel, this e-mail list facilitates dissemination of information and can expedite the matching
of technology needs with commercially available technologies.
Contacts:
Dale Pflug Duane Deonigi
Argonne National Laboratory Pacific Northwest Laboratory
9700 South Cass Avenue P.O. Box 999
Argonne, IL 60439 Mail Stop K8-04
630-252-6682 Richland, WA 99352
630-252-6414 fax 509-372-4278
dpflug@anl.gov 509-372-4394 fax
Website: http://www. ead. anl.gov/~techcon/index.html
23
-------
Technology Development Initiative
DOE's Technology Deployment Initiative (TDI) seeks to:
• achieve multiple deployments of cleanup technologies and processes that expedite DOE's
environmental management effort,
• obtain third-party validation of cost savings,
• facilitate the reinvestment of cost savings to increase participation in the program, and
• break down barriers to the implementation of new technologies.
Under TDI, technologies selected for participation and deployment support DOE's environmental
management mission and provide for multiple applications. Applications include a pricing proposal that
compares an estimated cost with that of a baseline technology—the technology should accelerate or reduce
the cost of that referenced baseline, or both. Applications must also include a commitment from the
proposing DOE site manager. TDI funding is for deployment of commercially ready technologies rather than
demonstrations.
Ranking criteria for applicants are divided into four areas: impact/technical approach; business management
approach; stakeholder/regulatory management approach; and cost. Incentives for developers to participate
in TDI include the availability of funds to accelerate deployment and cleanup, increased visibility for the
technologies through deployment and the generation of validated cost savings, multiple state acceptance of
the technology, and the opportunity for reinvestment of cost savings.
Contacts:
TDI Team To send regular mail to the TDI program:
Jeff Walker - DOE-HQ
Kurt Gerdes - DOE-HQ (TDI Team Contact Name)
Jihad Alj ayoushi - DOE-ID TDI Support Office
Julie Conner - DOE-ID 502 South Woodruff
Susan Prestwich - DOE-ID Idaho Falls, ID 83401
Fax: 208-528-2401
E-MAIL: tdi@wpi.org
Website: http://wastenot. inel.gov/tdi
24
-------
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency R&D Assistance Programs
Environmental Technology Verification Program
Over the years, EPA has evaluated technologies to determine their effectiveness in preventing, controlling,
and cleaning up pollution. EPA has expanded these efforts by instituting the Environmental Technology
Verification (ETV) Program to verify the performance of a larger universe of innovative technical solutions
to problems that threaten human health or the environment. ETV accelerates the entrance of new environ-
mental technologies into the marketplace by supplying technology buyers and developers, consulting
engineers, states, and EPA Regions with high-quality data on the performance of new technologies.
ETV expands past verification efforts, such as the SITE program (see p. 27) for remediation technologies,
into multiple pilot areas. In these pilot areas, EPA utilizes the expertise of partner "verification
organizations" to design efficient processes for conducting performance tests of innovative technologies.
EPA selects its partners from both the public and private sectors including Federal laboratories, States,
universities, and private sector facilities. Verification organizations will oversee and report verification
activities based on testing and quality assurance protocols developed with input from major stakeholders/
customer groups associated with the technology area.
Verification under ETV means confirmation of the performance characteristics of a commercial-ready
environmental technologies through the evaluation of objective and quality assured data. ETV's targeted
customers are:
• Technology users and purchasers
• Technology enablers
permitters, regulators
consulting engineers
• Technology developers and vendors
Each pilot will announce its intention to begin accepting technologies for verification in the Commerce
Business Daily and in the trade press. The pilot areas include the Consortium for Site Characterization
Technology (see NETTS program p. 16). By the year 2000, EPA envisions that the ETV program will be
comprised of numerous public and private testing entities covering all major classes of environmental
technology.
Contact: Penelope Hansen
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
TCS/NRMRL/ORD (8301)
Ariel Rios Building
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue N.W.
Washington, DC 20460
202-260-2600
Website: http://www.epa.gov/etv/
25
-------
National Center for Environmental Research
The EPA National Center for Environmental Research (NCER), administered by the EPA Office of
Research and Development, has primary responsibility to issue and manage research grant and fellowship
programs designed to expand EPA's science and technology base and the pool of qualified environmental
professionals. NCER also serves as EPA's focal point on quality assurance and peer review. NCER is com-
prised of four divisions:
• Environmental Engineering Research
• Environmental Sciences Research
• Quality Assurance
• Peer Review
The Environmental Engineering Research Division (EBRD) is responsible for planning, administering, and
managing the following programs:
• grants for research projects and centers in the engineering disciplines relevant to public
health and ecosystem protection;
• EPA's participation in the Small Business Innovation Research Program (see p. 14) and the
Strategic Environmental Research and Development Program (see p. 18); and
• coordination of ORD efforts in support of the EPA-wide Common Sense Initiative.
Contact: Steve Lingle
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
EERD/NCERQA (8722)
Ariel Rios Building
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue
Washington, DC 20460
202-260-4073
202-260-4524
E-MAIL: lingle.stephen@epamail.epa.gov
Website: http://es.inel.gov/ncerqa/
Remediation Technologies Development Forum
The Remediation Technologies Development Forum (RTDF) was established in 1992 by EPA to identify
ways of working together with industry to solve complex hazardous waste remediation problems. The RTDF
is open to all interested parties and has grown into a consortium of partners from private industry,
government agencies, and academia who share the common goal of developing more effective, less costly
hazardous waste characterization and treatment technologies. RTDF partnerships undertake research,
development, demonstration, testing, and evaluation efforts to achieve common cleanup goals.
The RTDF advances the development of cost-effective technologies for the remediation of hazardous
wastes, and works to achieve these goals by:
• identifying priority remediation technology development needs;
26
-------
• establishing and overseeing action teams to plan and implement collaborative research
projects to address these needs; and
• addressing scientific, institutional, and regulatory barriers to innovative treatment
technologies.
RTDF members establish self-managed action teams that bring members together to work on their highest
priority problems. These teams define technology research needs, develop and implement research project
plans, and produce and disseminate scientifically credible results to facilitate broad acceptance of the
technology.
EPA facilitates the operation of the Action Teams and the RTDF Steering Committee, and contributes its
research efforts to the jointly-led projects. EPA provides funding for RTDF research activities and Action
Team meetings. Other federal agencies, industry, and academic participants also provide funding, laboratory,
and field support for Action Team proj ects. Participants in each Action Team provide funding and/or in-kind
support for the Team's research efforts.
RTDF is currently made up of seven Action Teams:
Bioremediation Consortium
IINERT Soils-Metals Action Team
In Situ Flushing Action Team
Lasagna™ Consortium
Permeable Barriers Action Team
Phytoremediation of Organics
Sediments Remediation Action Team
Contacts:
Robert Olexsey
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
26 West Martin Luther King Dr.
Cincinnati, OH 45268
513-569-7861
Website:
http: //www. rtdf. org
Dr. Walter W. Kovalick, Jr.
Technology Innovation Office (5102G)
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Ariel Rios Building
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue N.W.
Washington, DC 20460
703-603-9910
Superfund Innovative Technology Evaluation Program
The Superfund Innovative Technology Evaluation Program was established by EPA's Offices of Research
and Development (ORD) and Solid Waste and Emergency Response (OSWER) to promote the development
and use of innovative technologies to remediate Superfund sites. The SITE Program places a special
emphasis on demonstrating technologies, including support for bench-scale through pilot-scale and field-
scale demonstrations, and includes reports of cost and performance data. The SITE Program consists of three
major components to achieve these goals: a Demonstration Program; an Emerging Technology Program;
and a Monitoring and Measurement Technologies Program.
27
-------
The Demonstration Program generates performance, engineering, and cost data through innovative
technology demonstrations. EPA publishes an annual solicitation for proposals from developers to
demonstrate their technologies. Typical demonstrations take place at Superfund sites. Under the Program,
the cost of the demonstration is split between the vendor and EPA. The vendor pays for the operation of the
demonstration, while EPA pays for all planning, sampling, and analysis. EPA also reports the results of the
demonstration.
The Emerging Technology Program supports bench-scale and pilot-scale development and testing of
innovative treatment technologies. EPA publishes an annual solicitation for proposals from developers.
The Monitoring and Measurement Technologies Program supports the development and demonstration of
innovative field technologies that monitor or measure hazardous substances.
Over the years, the SITE Program has completed demonstrations and issued reports for over 100 tech-
nologies. The advent of environmental technology development and commercialization as national priorities
in the last few years, along with the initiation of other EPA environmental technology programs, has led
EPA to review and reconsider the future role of the SITE Program in the overall federal environmental
technology strategy. For this reason, participation in the SITE Program by new partners has been temporarily
suspended.
Contact: Annette Gatchette
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
National Risk Management Research Laboratory
26 W. Martin Luther King Drive
Cincinnati, OH 45268
513-569-7696
28
-------
This page intentionally left blank.
29
-------
FEDERAL SITE REMEDIATION
TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT
ELECTRONIC DATA BASES
30
-------
U.S. Department of Commerce
National Technical Information Service (NTIS) Bibliographic Data
Base
The National Technical Information Service (NTIS) Bibliographic Data Base is a self-supporting agency
of the U.S. Department of Commerce and is the largest single source for public access to federally produced
information. NTIS is the federal agency charged with collecting and distributing federal scientific, technical,
and engineering information. The NTIS collection covers current technologies, business and management
studies, foreign and domestic trade, environment and energy, health, social sciences, general statistics, and
hundreds of other areas. When federal agencies and their contractors forward reports and other items to
NTIS, these items are entered into the NTIS computerized bibliographic data base and become part of the
NTIS archive.
The NTIS bibliographic data base contains data about federal data and software files, U.S. government
inventions available for licensing, reports on new technologies developed by federal agencies, federally
generated translations, and reports prepared by non-U.S. government agencies. An increasing proportion
of the database consists of unpublished material originating outside the U.S. Most NTIS records include
an abstract.
Contact: National Technical Information Service
U.S. Department of Commerce
5285 Port Royal Road
Springfield, VA 22161
703-487-4650
703-321-8547 (fax)
Website: http://www.ntis.gov
U.S. Department of Energy
DOE R&D Project Summaries Web Data Base
Access to over 12,000 R&D proj ects currently ongoing within the DOE can be found within this application.
Projects pertaining to Departmental activities in energy research, fossil energy, environmental management,
and energy efficiency and renewable energy, are some of the R&D disciplines found in the database.
The DOE R&D Project Summaries application, developed by the Office of Scientific & Technical
Information, contains a subset of the Department's FY 1995/1996 R&D holdings. Only projects contained
in the DOE R&D Tracking Database System with a Funding Mechanism of Managing and Operations
(M&O), Grant, Contract, Cooperative Agreements (Non-CRADA), or Small Business Innovative Research
(SBIR) are now available through this application. Additional R&D information such as Work For Others,
Lab Directed R&D, or the remaining DOE Only R&D information is accessible to Department of Energy
entities through the R&D Client/Server interface with the appropriate security levels.
31
-------
Over 75% of the total Department's R&D holdings are available through this Web based application. Proj ect
descriptions and other information about the proj ects may be viewed after performing a quick search, topical
search, or an advanced search.
Website: http://www. doe.gov/rnd/dbhome.html
New Technology from DOE
New Technology from DOE (NTD) contains brief descriptions of Department of Energy research results
that have potential for commercialization by U.S. industries. This data base is the centralized source of
online information on DOE technical innovations and advancements.
Each NTD record includes a technology description, patent status, secondary or spinoff applications,
literature citations, DOE laboratory and sponsoring information, subject descriptors, and a contact for
further information. The NTD currently contains 1200 records from 1986 to the present. It is anticipated
that older records dating from 1983 will be added to the data base.
Contact: Integrated Technical Information System
U.S. DOE Office of Science and Technical Information
P.O. Box 62
Oak Ridge, TN 37831
615-576-1222
The data base is available to DOE and its contractors through the Integrated Technical Information
System (ITIS). Public access is provided through the National Technical Information Service's
Technology Transfer Program (see p. 31).
ReOpt: Electronic Encyclopedia of Remedial Action Options
ReOpt provides information about remedial technologies drawn from DOE, EPA, and industry sources.
ReOpt provides descriptions of over 100 technologies, breaking the information into categories, including
application and regulatory information for nearly 850 contaminants. ReOpt was developed as part of DOE's
Remedial Action Assessment System project.
For each technology, ReOpt contains information for the following categories:
Flow diagram Associated Technologies
Description Technical Constraints
Engineering or Design Parameters Regulatory Constraints
Contaminant Applicability References
Data Requirements Previous Applications
ReOpt allows users to search by media, contaminant, and the functional manner in which the user wants to
restore the site (such as, in situ treatment) to focus the analysis of those technologies potentially applicable
to the scenario.
32
-------
The system is available on diskette for Federal staff and contractors under a Limited Government License
from the Energy Science and Technology Software Center (ESTSC). Others may purchase ReOpt through
Sierra Geophysics in Kirkland, Washington, (1-800-826-7644, ext. 120).
Contact: Energy Science and Technology Software Center
615-576-2606
or
Janet L. Bryant
Pacific Northwest National Laboratory
P.O. Box 999
Richland, WA 99352
Phone: (509) 375-3765
Fax: (509) 375-6417
E-mail: jl_bryant@pnl.gov Janet Bryant
ReOpt FAX Hotline:
509-375-6417
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Bioremediation in the Field Search System
The Bioremediation in the Field Search System (BFSS) provides information on waste sites across the
country where bioremediation is being tested or implemented or has been completed. BFSS users can search
the database electronically, view data on specific types of bioremediation sites, and print reports of selected
information. Registered users also receive EPA's quarterly Bioremediation in the Field bulletin.
BFSS currently provides information on ex situ and in situ technologies at more than 160 bioremediation
sites nationwide. The database includes full-scale remediation efforts and treatability and feasibility studies
that cover sites under EPA's CERCLA, RCRA, TSCA, and UST authority. Data for sites include location,
media, contaminants, and cost and performance. BFSS is available online through the ATTIC (see p. 39)
and CLU-IN (see p. 39).
RREL Treatability Data Base
The Treatability Data Base provides a thorough review of the effectiveness of proven treatment technologies
in the removal or destruction of chemicals from media such as municipal and industrial wastewater, drinking
water, groundwater, soil, debris, sludge, and sediment. The data base includes only those technologies that
are commercially available. The data base is distributed to federal, state, and local governments, foreign
governments, academia, industry, and many other groups.
The data base is organized by chemical. For each compound, the data base includes:
Physical/Chemical Properties
Freundlich Isotherm Data
Aqueous and Solid Treatability Data
Scale (Bench, Pilot, or Field)
33
-------
Average Concentration of Contaminants in Influent and Effluent
Average Percentage of Removal
Reference Citations with a Reference Abstract
The RREL Treatability DataBase is searchable online through ATTIC (see page 39) and downloadable from
CLU-IN (see page 39).
Vendor Information System for Innovative Treatment
Technologies/Vendor Field Analytical Characterization Technology
System
The Vendor Information System for Innovative Treatment Technologies (VISITT) contains technical
information submitted by vendors of innovative treatment technology equipment and services. The Vendor
Field Analytical Characterization Technology System (VendorFACTS) contains similar information on field
analytical characterization technologies. These systems are designed for use by hazardous waste cleanup
professionals wishing to learn about the application and performance of these technologies.
VISITT and VendorFACTS contain data on vendors of innovative remediation technologies to characterize
and treat ground water in situ, soils, sludges, and sediments. The systems do not include established
technologies, such as incineration and ex situ groundwater treatment. Technologies may be at the bench-,
pilot-, or full-scale. Each profile includes company information, technology description, and applicable
media, wastes, and contaminants. Other information may include unit costs, performance, waste limitations,
hardware and capacity, project names and contacts, treatability study capabilities, and references.
VISITT and VendorFACTS are free and available through ATTIC (see p. 39) and CLU-IN (see p. 39). The
systems are also available on diskette from EPA's National Center for Environmental Publications and
Information (NCEPI, see p. 40).
34
-------
This page intentionally left blank.
35
-------
FEDERAL ELECTRONIC RESOURCES
FOR SITE REMEDIATION
TECHNOLOGY INFORMA TION
36
-------
Federal Remediation Technologies Roundtable
The Federal Remediation Technologies Roundtable (FRTR) is an interagency executive committee made
up of Federal agencies with hazardous waste cleanup responsibilities. The Roundtable was created to
facilitate the exchange of information and provide a forum for joint action regarding the development and
demonstration of innovative technologies for hazardous waste remediation. Roundtable member agencies
expect to complete many site remediation projects in the near future, and recognize the importance of
providing expedited access to Federal resources for technology developers and others interested in
innovative technology development. As part of this effort, FRTR has established a website to provide access
to FRTR products and publications.
Resources available on the FRTR website:
• Information on cost and performance data reporting, including the Guide to Documenting
Cost and Performance for Remediation Projects and Case Study Abstracts.
• Remediation Technologies Screening Matrix and Reference Guide, Version 3.0, an online
"yellow pages" of remediation technologies that screens and evaluates candidate cleanup
technologies to assist remedial project managers (RPMs) in selecting among remedial
alternatives.
• Completed North American Innovative Remediation Technology Demonstration Proj ects
Data Base.
Website: http://www.frtr.gov.
U.S. Department of Defense
Defense Environmental Network and Information Exchange
The Defense Environmental Network and Information Exchange (DENIX) serves as a centralized
communication platform for disseminating environmental information pertaining to DoD's environmental
security mission area. It fosters online communications and technology transfer among DoD components.
DENIX contains a messaging component as well as the capability for file transfers. DENIX includes
information on cleanup technologies, policies, and regulatory information.
Website: The public may access DENIX at http://denix.cecer.army.mil/denix/Public/public.html.
Fielding Environmental Solutions
Fielding Environmental Solutions is a monthly electronic newsletter provided by the U.S. Army
Environmental Center. This free service highlights technology information, new publications, and events
of interest to environmental users. On the first of each month, messages are disseminated that provide
information on environmental technologies, the availability of publications, and the status of upcoming
events. These short messages not only give a synopsis of the information, but also inform the reader
about how to obtain further information.
37
-------
Fielding Environmental Solutions serves as an effective technology transfer tool to bridge the gap
between the developers, regulators, and users of innovative technologies. The information exchanged
cuts across all pillars and activity areas.
USAEC projects and programs are not the only items highlighted by Fielding Environmental Solutions.
Often different services, major commands, organizations, or installations provide stories or serve as
guest editors. Fielding Environmental Solutions is a forum for users to share success stories and
problems with others in the environmental community.
Website: For subscription information or to submit articles for publication, contact:
http://aec.army.mil/prod/usaec/et/listweb.htm or the newsletter administrator at
t2hotline@aec.apgea.army.mil.
Technology Summary Sheets
The Air Force Research Laboratory Airbase and Environmental Technology Division (AFRL/MLQ) has
developed Technology Summary Sheets (TSSs) to publicize its research and development programs.
The TSSs describe capabilities, facilities (both laboratory and test sites), research interests, collaborative
efforts, and the major research projects and programs completed or underway in the Division. These
summary sheets identify new technologies, provide information on how technologies are applied, and
give results of completed projects or the status of on-going projects. They also provide the name and
telephone number of project managers if additional information is needed.
Website: The TSSs, along with software, technical reports, protocols, and manuals can be
accessed through the AFRL/MLQ web page at:
http :\\www. ml. afrl. af mil/di visions/ml q/mlq.htm.
U.S. Department of Energy
Environmental Technologies Remedial Actions Data Exchange
(EnviroTRADE)
The Environmental Technologies Remedial Actions Data Exchange (EnviroTRADE) is an international
information system that matches environmental problems with potential technological solutions by
combining information management techniques, graphical interfaces, and the Geographical Information
System (GIS). EnviroTRADE was developed to identify domestic and international environmental
technology market opportunities.
EnviroTRADE contains both foreign and domestic technologies and needs profiles. Users can identify
possible matches between worldwide environmental restoration and waste management needs and
technologies. EnviroTRADE will also provide general information on international environmental
restoration and waste management organizations, sites, activities, funding, and contracts. The system is user
friendly, providing visually oriented information such as photographs, graphics, maps, and diagrams of
technologies and sites. The system has expanded into a fully functional GIS.
Website: http://em-50.em.doe.gov/et/et.html
38
-------
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Alternative Treatment Technology Information Center
The Alternative Treatment Technology Information Center (ATTIC) is a free computer bulletin board and
data base system providing up-to-date information on innovative treatment technologies. ATTIC provides
access to several independent databases as well as a mechanism for retrieving full-text documents of key
literature. The bulletin board features news items, bulletins, computer files, and a messaging system that
enables users to communicate and request advice from another users and to seek help from the system
operator. ATTIC can be accessed with a personal computer and modem.
Data bases available through ATTIC include:
ATTIC Treatment Technology Database
RREL Treatability Database (see p. 33)
Bioremediation in the Field Search System (BFSS) (see p. 32)
Vendor Information System for Innovative Treatment Technologies (VISITT) (see p. 34)
Underground Storage Tank (UST) Database
Oil/Chemical Spill Database
The dial-in number for ATTIC is (513) 569-7610. The FTP and Telnet address is cinbbs.cin.epa.gov.
ATTIC support line:
(513) 569-7272
Website: http://www.epa.gov/attic/index.html
Hazardous Waste Cleanup Information System
The Hazardous Waste Cleanup Information (CLU-IN) site is a comprehensive information resource
designed to assist hazardous waste cleanup professionals in finding the latest information on innovative
hazardous waste treatment technologies, including information on programs, organizations, publications,
and access to data bases and other tools for cleanups. CLU-IN users include EPA staff, other federal and
state personnel, consulting engineers, technology vendors, remediation contractors, researchers, community
groups, and the public.
CLU-IN features include the following:
Data bases that can be searched or downloaded, including:
Bioremediation in the Field Search System (BFSS) (see p. 32)
RREL Treatability Database (see p. 33)
Vendor Information System for Innovative Treatment Technologies (VISITT) (see p. 34)
Vendor Field Analytical Characterization Technology System (VendorFACTS) (see p. 34)
TechDirect, an information service that highlights new publications and events of interest to site
remediation and site assessment professionals.
39
-------
Publications for downloading on a wide variety of subjects related to hazardous waste cleanup, including
remediation technologies, site characterization technologies, supply and demand of technologies,
partnerships and consortia, and regulatory and policy issues.
CLU-IN System Operator
301-589-8368
301-589-8487 (fax)
Website: http://clu-in.com.
National Center for Environmental Publications and Information
The National Center for Environmental Publications and Information (NCEPI) is a central repository for all
EPA documents with over 5500 titles in paper and/or electronic format, available for distribution. Titles may
be searched and ordered via the Internet. Publications may also be ordered by calling 1-800-490-9198.
Website: http://cioma40.cin/epa.gov:6003.
40
-------
This page intentionally left blank.
41
-------
OTHER ELECTRONIC RESOURCES FOR
SITE REMEDIA TION
TECHNOLOGY INFORMA TION
42
-------
Global Network for Environmental Technology
The Global Network of Environment & Technology (GNET) utilizes the latest communications technology
to bring together the people, processes, and policies that shape environmental business. GNET provides
services to enhance efforts to communicate, exchange information, and conduct business. GNET was
developed by the Global Environment & Technology Foundation (GETF), a not-for-profit organization
sponsored in part by DOE's Global Environmental Technology Enterprise initiative. GNET was created to
promote the commercialization of innovative environmental technologies to achieve environmentally
sustainable development. GNET provided an interactive communications service for the White House's
Technology for a Sustainable Future Initiative, bringing together high-level environmental decision-makers
and facilitating development of the national environmental technology strategy, "Bridge to a Sustainable
Future." GNET services are used by the Interagency Environmental Technologies Office, governmental
agencies, businesses, and individuals in the environmental technology field. Membership in and information
from GNET and GETF are free.
The GNET website has the following features:
TechKnow™ Data Base—TechKnow™ provides environmental technology information using a targeted
search capability that combines multiple category schemes, including contaminant groups, affected media
and other keywords.
Environment & Technology NewsBriefs—Environment & Technology NewsBriefs is a round-up of
summaries of the top stories in the environmental business field culled from over 750 published sources.
Environment & Technology Business Forum—GNET members can interact on-line with top policy
makers and executives through the monthly Environment & Technology Business Forum.
Contact: Global Environment & Technology Foundation
7010 Little River Turnpike, Suite 300
Annandale, Virginia 22003
703-750-6401
703-750-6506 (fax)
Email: GETF@gnet.org
Website: http://www.gnet.org
Groundwater Remediation Technologies Analysis Center
The Groundwater Remediation Technologies Analysis Center (GWRTAC), established in 1995, is a
specialized national environmental technology transfer center that provides current information
concerning innovative groundwater remediation technologies. GWRTAC is operated by the National
Environmental Technologies Applications Center (NETAC), in association with the University of
Pittsburgh's Environmental Engineering Program, under a Cooperative Agreement with the U.S. EPA
Technology Innovation Office (TIO). GWRTAC compiles, analyzes, and disseminates information on
innovative groundwater remediation technologies and offers a wide range of information on the state of
development of all emerging groundwater remediation activities through a website that provides access
to searchable case study databases and pertinent technical documents. Information resources include:
43
-------
Technology Database—Searchable database that contains case study information on ground-water
remediation technologies including project location, target contaminants, site characterization, and
project contacts.
Vendor Information Database—Database that allows interested parties to locate remediation
technology developers and service providers. Links to vendors are included in the Vendor Information
database portion of the website. Potential vendors can request submittal through on-line forms.
Technology Evaluation Reports—Peer-reviewed reports, prepared by experts, that provide
state-of-the-art reviews of selected remediation technologies.
Information Reports—A variety of reports that review trends in technology utilization, regulatory
issues and perspectives, state policies, and sources of information.
Technology Overview Reports—GWRTAC authored reports that provide a general overview and brief
introduction of specific groundwater remediation technologies.
Status Reports—A snapshot of the status and current development efforts of emerging technologies,
prepared by GWRTAC, EPA-TIO, and others.
Contact; GWRTAC
615 William Pitt Way
Pittsburgh, PA 15238
800-373-1973
412-826-5512 ext. 215
E-mail: gwrtac@netac.org
Website: http://www.gwrtac.org
National Technology Transfer Center
The National Technology Transfer Center (NTTC) at Wheeling Jesuit University works with federal
entities like NASA, EPA, Department of Defense, Department of Energy, Department of Justice,
Department of Commerce, universities, entrepreneurs and Fortune 500 companies in presenting
effective ways to help U.S. corporations and taxpayers access and use federally-financed technologies.
NTTC's task is to take technologies off laboratory shelves and put them to work in U.S. businesses and
industries. The NTTC website provides a large number of links to electronic technology resources.
Contact: National Technology Transfer Center
Wheeling Jesuit University
316 Washington Avenue
Wheeling, WV 26003
800-678-6882
Website: http://www.nttc.edu/
44
-------
This page intentionally left blank.
45
-------
SELECTED BIBLIOGRAPHY:
FEDERAL PUBLICA TIONS ON
ALTERNATIVE AND INNOVATIVE SITE
REMEDIATION TECHNOLOGIES
46
-------
BIOLOGICAL
EPA
A Bioventing Approach To Remediate A Gasoline Contaminated Surface
EPA 600-A-92-220; NTIS: PB93-119816
Bioremediation: A Video Primer (Video)
EPA 510-V-94-001
Bioremediation Field Evaluation: Champion International Superfund Site, Libby, MT
EPA 540-R-96-500
Bioremediation Field Evaluation: EielsonAir Force Base, Alaska
EPA 540-R-95-533
Bioremediation Field Initiative Site Profile: Champion Site, Libby, MT
EPA 540-F-95-506A
Bioremediation Field Initiative Site Profile: EielsonAir Force Base, AK
EPA 540-F-95-506B
Bioremediation Field Initiative Site Profile: Hill Air Force Base Superfund Site, UT
EPA 540-F-95-506C
Bioremediation Field Initiative Site Profile: Public Service Company of Colorado
EPA 540-F-95-506D
Bioremediation Field Initiative Site Profile: Escambia Wood Preserving Site, FL
EPA 540-F-95-506G
Bioremediation Field Initiative Site Profile: Reilly Tar and Chemical Corporation, MN
EPA 540-F-95-506H
Bioremediation of Former Manufactured-Gas Plant Sites
NTIS: PB95-235123
Bioremediation of Hazardous Wastes: Research, Development, and Field Evaluations
EPA 540-R-95-532; NTIS: PB96-130729
Bioremediation of Petroleum Hydrocarbons: A Flexible, Variable-Speed Technology
EPA 600-A-95-140; NTIS: PB96-139035
Bioremediation Using the Land Treatment Concept
EPA 600-R-93-164; NTIS: PB94-107927
Bioremediation Resource Guide and Matrix
EPA 542-B-93-004; NTIS: PB94-112307
47
-------
Champion International Super fund Site, Libby, Montana: Bioremediation Field Performance
Evaluation of the Prepared Bed Land Treatment System, Volumes I & II
EPA 600-R-95-156; NTIS: PB96-205448
Demonstration Bulletin: Augmented In Situ Subsurface Bioremediation Process, Bio-Rem, Inc.
EPA 540-MR-93-527
Demonstration Bulletin: New York State Multi-Vendor Bioremediation: ENSR Consulting and
Engineer ing/Lor sen Engineers', Ex-Situ Biovault
EPA 540-MR-95-524
Demonstration Bulletin: New York State Multi-Vendor Bioremediation: R.E. Wright Environmental,
Inc. 's In-Situ Bioremediation Treatment System
EPA 540-MR-95-525
Emerging Technology Bulletin: Methanotrophic Bioreactor System, Biotrol, Inc.
EPA 540-F-93-506
Emerging Technology Bulletin: Two-Zone PCE Bioremediation System, ABB Environmental Services,
Inc.
EPA 540-F-95-510
Engineering Bulletin: In Situ Biodegradation Treatment
EPA 540-S-94-502; NTIS: PB94-190469
Field-Derived Transformation Rates for Modeling Natural Bioattenuation of Trichloroethene and its
Degradation Products. Weaver, J.W., et al. Proceedings of the Next Generation Computational Models
Computational Method Conference, Bay City, MI, Aug. 7-9, 1995.
EPA 600-A-95-142; NTIS: PB96-139092
Influence of Surfactants on Microbial Degradation of Organic Compounds. Rouse, J.D., et al. Critical
Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology 24(4): 325-370.
EPA 600-J-95-176
Innovative Site Remediation Technology: Bioremediation
EPA 542-B-94-006
Innovative Technology Evaluation Report: J.R. Simplot Ex-Situ Bioremediation Technology for
Treatment of Dinoseb-Contaminated Soils
EPA 540-R-94-508; Demonstration Bulletin: EPA 540-MR-94-508; SITE Technology Capsule:
EPA-540-R-94-508A; NTIS: PB96-117254
Innovative Technology Evaluation Report: J.R. Simplot Ex-Situ Bioremediation Technology for
Treatment of TNT-Contaminated Soils
EPA 540-R-95-529; Demonstration Bulletin: EPA 540-MR-95-529; SITE Technology Capsule:
EPA 540-R-95-529A
In Situ Bioremediation of Contaminated Unsaturated Subsurface Soils
EPA 540-S-93-501; NTIS: PB93-234565
48
-------
In Situ Bioremediation of Ground Water and Geological Material: A Review of Technologies
EPA 600-SR-93-124; NTIS: PB93-215564
Intrinsic Bioattenuation for Subsurface Restoration. Wilson, J.T., et al.
Proceedings of the Third International Symposium on In-Situ and On-Site Bioreclamation, San Diego,
CA, April 24-27, 1995.
EPA 600-A-95-112; NTIS: PB95-274213
Intrinsic Bioremediation of Fuel Contamination in Ground Water at a Field Site. Wilson, J.T., et al.
Symposium on Intrinsic Bioremediation of Ground Water, Denver, CO, Aug. 30-Sept. 1, 1994.
EPA 600-A-95-141; NTIS: PB96-139084
Microbial Activity in Subsurface Samples Before and During Nitrate-Enhanced Bioremediation
EPA 600-A-95-109; NTIS: PB95-274239
Performance and Cost Evaluation of Bioremediation Techniques for Fuel Spills. Ward, C.H., et al.
Proceedings of the In-Situ Bioremediation Symposium, Sept. 20-24, 1992
EPA 600-A-93-073; NTIS: PB93-175545
Performance of Pilot-Scale Bioventing at an Aviation Gasoline Spill Site. Kampbell, D.H. Proceedings
of the Environmental Restoration Technology Transfer Symposium, Jan. 26-27, 1993, Elgin AFB, San
Antonio, TX
EPA 600-A-93-176; NTIS: PB93-221943
Review of Intrinsic Bioremediation ofTCE in Groundwater at Picatinny Arsenal, New Jersey and St.
Joseph, Michigan
EPA 600-A-95-096; NTIS: PB95-252995
Solid Oxygen Source for Bioremediation in Subsurface Soils (Revised)
EPA 600-J-94-495; NTIS: PB95-155149
U.S. Air Force
Aerobic Degradation ofTrichlorethylene. Nelson, M.J.K., et al.
ESL-TR-86-44; NTIS: AD-A184 948/8
U.S. Army
Bioremediation Methods for Treatment of TNT Contaminated Soils (Technical Report)
NTIS: AD-A277 750/6
Development of a Zero Headspace Aerobic, Suspended Growth Bioreactor
Report No. MP-EL-94-8
Evaluation of Operational Factors Contributing to Reduced Recharge Capacity of the North Boundary
Treatment System, Rocky Mountain Arsenal, Commerce City, CO
WES: EL-94-12
Field Demonstration of Slurry Reactor Biotreatment of Explosives-Contaminated Soils
49
-------
SFIM-AEC-ET-CR-96178
Hot Gas Decontamination of Explosive-Contaminated Items, Process and Facility Conceptual Design
SFIM-AEC-ET-CR-94118
Installation Restoration Research Program. Alternative Methods for Biological Destruction of TNT: A
Preliminary Feasibility Assessment of Enzymatic Degradation (Final Report)
WES/TR/IRRP-94-3; NTIS: AD-A285 645/8
Rapid Development ofMicrobial Stains for Bioremediation of Military Soils and Dredged Materials
Contaminated with Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons
WES: EL-93-18
Technical Approach for In Situ Biotreatment Research: Bench-Scale Experiments
TR-IRRP-93-3
Windrow Composting Demonstration for Explosives-Contaminated Soils at the Umatilla Depot Activity,
Hermiston, Oregon, Contract No. DACA31-91-R
CETHA-TS-CR-93043
Windrow Composting of Explosives-Contaminated Soil at Umatilla Depot Activity: Technology
Application Analysis
SFIM-AEC-ET-CR-94072
Results ofaMicrobial Weathering Study of Composted Explosive Contaminated Soil Obtained From
Umatilla Army Depot Activity
SFIM-AEC-ET-CR-98042
Results of a Study Investigating the Plant Uptake of Explosive Residues From Compost of Explosive
Contaminated Soil From Umatilla Army Depot Activity
SFIM-AEC-ET-CR-98043
Cost Report: Windrow Composting to Treat Explosive Contaminated Soil At Umatilla Army Depot
Activity
SFIM-AEC-ET-CR-96184
Design Guidance Manual-Low Cost Disposable Hot Gas Decon System For Explosive Contaminated
Equipment and Facilities
SFIM-AEC-ET-CR-98046
50
-------
CONFERENCES AND INTERNATIONAL SURVEYS
EPA
NATO/CCMS Pilot Study — Evaluation of Demonstrated and Emerging Technologies for the Treatment
and Cleanup of Contaminated Land and Groundwater (Phase II). Interim Status Report Number 203
EPA 542-R-95-006; NTIS: PB95-227849
Northeast Remediation Marketplace: Business Opportunities for Innovative Technologies (Summary
Proceedings)
EPA 542-R-94-001; NTIS: PB94-154770
Remedial Action, Treatment, and Disposal of Hazardous Waste: Proceedings of the 20th Annual RREL
Hazardous Waste Research Symposium
EPA 600-R-94-011; NTIS: PB94-159092
Rocky Mountain Remediation Marketplace: Business Opportunities for Innovative Technologies
(Summary Proceedings)
EPA 542-R-94-006; NTIS: PB95-173738
Symposium on Bioremediation of Hazardous Wastes: Research, Development, and Field Evaluations,
Rye Brook, New York, August 8-10, 1995. (Abstracts only)
EPA 600-R-95-078
Symposium on Natural Attenuation of Chlorinated Organics in Ground Water, Dallas, TX, Sept. 11-13,
1996: Proceedings
EPA 540-R-96-509
21st Annual Environmental Protection Agency Risk Reduction Engineering Laboratory (RREL)
Research Symposium: Abstract Proceedings, Cincinnati, OH 4-6 Apr 1995
EPA 600-R-95-012; NTIS: PB95-193322
United States/German Bilateral Agreement on Hazardous Waste Site Clean-up Projects: Conference
Proceedings
EPA 600-A-95-068; NTIS: PB95-217675
West Coast Remediation Marketplace: Business Opportunities for Innovative Technologies
EPA 542-R-94-008; NTIS: PB95-143319
U.S. Army
Proceedings of UXO Forum '99
Available at http://www.denix.osd.mil
Proceedings of the Tri-Service Environmental Technology Workshop
SFIM-AEC-ET-CR-96187
Proceedings of the Second Tri-Service Environmental Technology Workshop
51
-------
SFIM-AEC-ET-CR-97050
Proceedings of the Third Tri-Service Environmental Technology Workshop
Available at http://aec.army.mil/prod/usaec/et/etw/proceedings.htm
52
-------
GROUNDWATER
DOE
Subsurface Contaminants Focus Area
DOE/EM-0296; NTIS: DE96-013524
EPA
Advanced Oxidation Technologies for the Treatment of Contaminated Groundwater.
EPA 600-A-94-005; NTIS: PB-94-137353
Anaerobic Biodegradation ofBTEXin Aquifer Material
EPA 600-S-97-003
Assessing UST Corrective Action Technologies: Lessons Learned About In Situ Air Sparging at the
Denison Avenue Site, Cleveland, Ohio (Project Report)
EPA 600-R-95-040; NTIS: PB95-188082
Case Study: Natural Attenuation of a Trichloroethene Plume at Picatinny Arsenal, New Jersey.
EPA 600-A-96-078; NTIS: PB97-122949
Compilation of Ground-Water Models
EPA 600-R-93-118; NTIS: PB93-209401
Complex Mixtures and Groundwater Quality
EPA 600-S-93-004; NTIS: PB94-196970
Emerging Abiotic In situ Remediation Technologies for Ground Water and Soil. Summary Report
EPA 542-S-95-001; NTIS: PB95-239299
Evaluation of Ground Water Extraction Remedies; Phase II
Vol. 1, Summary Report
OSWER Directive 9355.4-05; NTIS: PB92-963346
Vol. 2, Case Studies and Updates
OSWER Directive 9355.4-05A; NTIS: PB92-963347
Evaluation of Technologies For Cleanup ofDNAPL Contaminated Sites
EPA 600-R-94-120; NTIS: PB94-195039
Field Applications ofln-Situ Remediation Technologies: Permeable Reactive Barriers
EPA 542-R-99-002
Full-Scale Field Demonstration of the Use of Hydrogen Peroxide for In-Situ Bioremediation of an
Aviation Gasoline-Contaminated Aquifer. Bioremediation: Field Experience. CRC Press, Inc. Lewis
Publishers: 1994, pp 333-359.
EPA 600-A-94-019; NTIS: PB94-146396
53
-------
Ground Water Issue: Nonaqueous Phase Liquids Compatibility with Materials Used in Well
Construction, Sampling, and Remediation
EPA 540-S-95-503; NTIS: PB95-269643
Ground Water Treatment Technology Resource Guide
EPA 542-B-94-009; NTIS: PB95-138657
Innovative Technology Evaluation Report: Zenon Cross-flow Pervaporation Technology
EPA 540-R-95-511; Site Technology Capsule: EPA 540-R-95-511A; NTIS: PB96-100193
In situ Immobilization and Detoxification of Chr ornate-Contaminated Ground Water Using Zero-Valent
Iron: Field Experiments at the USCG Support Center, Elizabeth City, North Carolina
EPA 600-A-96-036; NTIS: PB96-169313
In Situ Remediation Technology Status Report: Electrokinetics
EPA 542-K-94-007; NTIS: PB95-236873
In Situ Remediation Technology Status Report: Treatment Walls
EPA 542-K-94-004; NTIS: PB95-252383
In Situ Treatments of Contaminated Ground Water: An Inventory of Research and Field
Demonstrations and Strategies for Improving Ground Water Remediation Technologies.
EPA 500-K-93-001; NTIS: PB93-193720
Introduction to Groundwater Investigations
EPA 540-R-95-060; NTIS: PB95-963240
Metal-Enhanced Dechlorination of Volatile Organic Compounds Using an In-Situ Reactive Iron Wall:
Innovative Technology Evaluation Report
EPA 540-R-98-501
Methods for Monitoring Pump-and-Treat Performance
EPA 600-R-94-123; NTIS: PB95-125456
Modeling: CZAEM User's Guide: Modeling Capture Zones of Ground Water Wells Using Analytic
Elements
EPA 600-R-94-174; NTIS: PB95-179495
Modeling: The Hydrocarbon Spill Screening Model (HSSM) Volume I: User's Guide
EPA 600-R-94-039A; NTIS: PB94-189487
Modeling: The Hydrocarbon Spill Screening Model (HSSM) Volume II: Theoretical Backgrounds and
Source Code
EPA 600-R-94-039B
Natural Attenuation of Trichlorethene at the St. Joseph, Michigan, Super fund Site
EPA 600-SV-95-001
Permeable Reactive Barrier Technologies for Contaminant Remediation
54
-------
EPA 600-R-98-125; NTIS: PB99-105702
Permeable Reactive Subsurface Barriers for Interception and Remediation of Chlorinated Hydrocarbon
and Chromium (VI) Plumes in Ground Water
EPA 600-F-97-008
Remediation Case Studies:
Volume 2: Groundwater Treatment
EPA 542-R-95-003, PB95-182929
Volume 9: Groundwater Pump and Treat (Chlorinated Solvents)
EPA 542-R-98-013, PB99-106759
Volume 10: Groundwater Pump and Treat (Nonchlorinated Contaminants)
EPA 542-R-98-014, PB99-106767
Volume 11: Innovative Groundwater Treatment Technologies
EPA 542-R-98-015, PB99-106775
Remediation of Chromate-Contaminated Groundwater Using Zero-Valent Iron: Field Test at USCG
Support Center, Elizabeth City, North Carolina. Puls, R. W., et al.
EPA/600/A-96/075; NTIS: PB97-122915
State Policies Concerning the Use of Injectants for In-Situ Ground Water Remediation
EPA 542-R-96-001; NTIS: PB96-164538
Status Reports on In Situ Treatment Technology Demonstration and Applications:
Surfactant Enhancements EPA 542-K-94-003
Treatment Walls EPA 542-K-94-004
Hydrofracturing/Pneumatic Fracturing EPA 542-K-94-005
Cosolvents EPA 542-K-94-006
Electrokinetics EPA 542-K-94-007
Altering Chemical Conditions EPA 542-K-94-008
Surfactant Injection for Ground Water Remediation: State Regulators' Perspectives and Experiences
EPA 542-R-95-011; NTIS: PB96-164546
Technology Evaluation Report: Accutech Pneumatic Fracturing Extraction and Hot Gas Injection,
Phase I
EPA 540-R-93-509; NTIS: PB93-216596
Testing and Demonstration Sites for Innovative Ground-Water Remediation Technologies
EPA 542-R-97-002
The Use of Cationic Surfactants to Modify Aquifer Materials to Reduce the Mobility of Hydrophobic
Organic Compounds
EPA 600-S-94-002; NTIS: PB95-111951
Use of Monitored Natural Attenuation at Super fund, RCRA, and Underground Storage Tank Sites
OSWER Directive 9200.4-17P
55
-------
U.S. Army
Phytoremediation of Explosive-Contaminated Groundwater in Constructed Wetlands: I-Batch Study
SFIM-AEC-ET-CR-96166
Phytoremediation of Explosive-Contaminated Groundwater in Constructed Wetlands: II-Flow Through
Study
SFIM-AEC-ET-CR-96167
Pink Water Treatment Options
SFIM-AEC-ETD-CR-95036
Removal of N-Nitrosodimethylamine from Rocky Mountain Arsenal Waters Using Innovative
Adsorption Technologies (Final Report).
WES/TR/EL-96-11; NTIS: AD-A314 374
Treatment ofPropellant Production Wastewaters Containing 2,4-Dinitrotoluene
SFIM-AEC-ETD-CR-95048
Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Existing Groundwater Systems in the US Army
Army Science Board, 1998
Army Groundwater Modeling Use and Needs Workshop
WES/TRIRRP-93-1
Documentation on Limitations and Applicabilities of the Use of Off-the-Shelf Groundwater Models in
Site Cleanup
WES/TR IRRP-97-4
Remediation of Contaminated Army Sites: Utility of Natural Attenuation
Army Science Board, 1996
Groundwater Modeling in the Army Restoration Programs
Army Science Board, 1994
Innovations in Groundwater and Soil Cleanup: From Concept to Commercialization
National Research Council, 1997
Alternatives for Groundwater Cleanup
National Research Council, 1994
Groundwater Models: Scientific and Regulatory Applications
National Research Council, 1990
Ground Water Manual
U.S. Department of Interior
Draft Protocol for Evaluating, Selecting, and Implementing Monitored Natural Attenuation at
56
-------
Explosives-Contaminated Sites
WES TR EL-99-10
Navy
Groundwater Circulating Well Technology Assessment
NRL/PU/6115-99-384; Also available on the Internet at www.estcp.org/technical_documents.htm
ESTCP
Technology Status Review: In Situ Oxidation
Available on the Internet at www.estcp.org/technical_documents.htm
57
-------
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL
EPA
Applications Analysis Report (SITE Program): Bergmann USA Soil Sediment Washing Technology
EPA 540-AR-92-075; PB96-138771
Applications Analysis Report (SITE Program): Magnum Water Technology Inc.-CAV-OX Ultraviolet
Cavitation Oxidation Process
EPA 540-AR-93-520; NTIS: PB94-189438
Applications Analysis Report (SITE Program): Micro filtration Technology EPOC Water, Inc.
EPA 540-AR-93-513; NTIS: PB96-138763
Applications Analysis Report (SITE Program): Perox-Pure- Chemical Oxidation Technology-
Per-oxidation Systems, Inc.
EPA 540-AR-93-501; NTIS: PB94-130325
Applications Analysis Report (SITE Program): POWWER- Evaporation Catalytic Oxidation
EPA 540-AR-93-506; NTIS: PB94-124658
Applications Analysis Report (SITE Program): Toronto Harbour Commissioners—Soil Recycling
Treatment Train
EPA 540-AR-93-517; NTIS: PB94-124674
Applications Analysis Report (SITE Program): U.S. EPA-Mobile Volume Reduction Unit.
EPA 540-AR-93-508; NTIS: PB94-130275
Assessing UST Corrective Action Technologies: Diagnostic Evaluation of In Situ SVE-Based System
Performance
EPA 600-R-96-041; PB96-163597
Assessing UST Corrective Action Technologies: In Situ SVE-Based Systems for Free Product Recovery
and Residual Hydrocarbon Removal
EPA 600-R-96-042; NTIS: PB96-163605
Assessment and Remediation of Contaminated Sediments (ARCS) Program
EPA 905-R-94-003
Chr ornate Reduction and Remediation Utilizing the Thermodynamic Instability of Zero-Valence State
Iron. Proceedings of the Water Environment Federation Conference on Innovative Solutions for
Contaminated Site Management, Miami, FL, March 3-6, 1994.
EPA 600-A-94-070; NTIS: PB94-163516
Combined Chemical and Biological Oxidation of Slurry Phase Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons
EPA 600-A-95-065; NTIS: PB95-217642
58
-------
Coupled Iron Corrosion and Chromate Reduction: Mechanisms for Subsurface Remediation. Powell,
R.M.,etal. Environmental Science & Technology Vol. 29: 1913-1922.
EPA 600-J-95-447
Demonstration Bulletin (SITE Program): Colloid Polishing Filter Method, Flow Technology, Inc.
EPA 540-MR-94-501
Demonstration Bulletin (SITEProgram): Forager Sponge Technology.
EPA 540-MR-94-522
Demonstration Bulletin (SITE Program): Fungal Treatment Technology..
EPA 540-MR-93-514
Demonstration Bulletin (SITE Program): Gas-Phase Chemical Reduction, Ecologic International Inc.
EPA 540-MR-93-522
Demonstration Bulletin (SITE Program): Geosafe Corporation In Situ Vitrification
EPA 540-MR-94-520
Demonstration Bulletin (SITE Program): Hrubetz Environmental Services, In Situ Thermal Oxidation
Process.
EPA 540-MR-93-524
Demonstration Bulletin (SITE Program): Hydraulic Fracturing of Contaminated Soil.
EPA 540-MR-93-505
Demonstration Bulletin (SITEProgram): Inplant Systems, Inc.; Sfc 0.5 Oleoflltration System
EPA 540-MR-94-525
Demonstration Bulletin (SITE Program): In Situ Steam Enhanced Recovery System, Hughes
Environmental Systems.
EPA 540-MR-94-510
Demonstration Bulletin (SITEProgram): In Situ Vitrification, Geosafe Corporation.
EPA 540-MR-94-520
Demonstration Bulletin (SITE Program): Metal-Enhanced Abiotic Degradation Technology,
Environmetal Technologies, Inc.
EPA 540-MR-95-510
Demonstration Bulletin (SITE Program): Micro filtration Technology EPOC Water, Inc.
EPA 540-MR-93-513
Demonstration Bulletin (SITE Program): Terra Kleen Solvent Extraction Technology-Terra Kleen
Response Group, Inc.
EPA 540-MR-94-521; SITE Technology Capsule: EPA/540/R-94/521A; NTIS: PB95-213617
59
-------
Demonstration Bulletin (SITE Program): Texaco Gasification Process, Texaco Inc.
EPA 540-MR-94-514
Demonstration ofVOC Treatment and Disposal via Spray Irrigation, Hastings, Nebraska: Fact Sheet.
EPA/540/F-96/503
Emerging Technology Bulletin: Electrokinetic Soil Processing
EPA 540-F-95-504; Project Summary: EPA 540-SR-93-515
Emerging Technology Bulletin: Process for the Treatment of Volatile Organic Carbon and
Heavy-Metal-Contaminated Soil, International Technology Corp.
EPA 540-F-95-509
Emerging Technology Report: Demonstration of Amber sorb 563 Adsorbent Technology
EPA 540-R-95-516; NTIS: PB95-264164; Emerging Technology Summary: EPA 540-SR-95-516
Emerging Technology Summary: Bench-Scale Testing of Photolysis, Chemical Oxidation and
Biodegradation ofPCB Contaminated Soils, and Photolysis ofTCDD Contaminated Soils
EPA 540-SR-94-531
Engineering Bulletin: In Situ Vitrification Treatment.
EPA 540-S-94-504; NTIS: PB95-125499
Engineering Bulletin: Solvent Extraction
EPA 540-S-94-503; NTIS: PB94-190477
Innovative Site Remediation Technology: Solvent/Chemical Extraction
EPA 542-B-94-005
Innovative Site Remediation Technology: Vacuum Vapor Extraction
EPA 542-B-94-002
Innovative Technology Evaluation Report: Dynaphore, Inc., Forager™ Sponge Technology.
EPA-540-R-95-522; NTIS: PB95-268041
SITE Technology Capsule: EPA/540/R-94/522A; NTIS: PB95-213229
Innovative Technology Evaluation Report: Geosafe Corporation In Situ Vitrification
EPA 540-R-94-520; NTIS: PB95-213245
Innovative Technology Evaluation Report: Hydraulic Fracturing of Contaminated Soil
EPA 540-R-93-505; NTIS: PB94-100161
Innovative Technology Evaluation Report: Inplant Systems, Inc.; Sfc 0.5 Olecfiltration System
EPA 540-R-94-525; NTIS: PB95-236410
Innovative Technology Evaluation Report: Silicate Technology Corporation, Solidification/Stabilization
ofPCP and Inorganic Contaminants in Soils
EPA/540/R-95/010; NTIS: PB95-255709
60
-------
Innovative Technology Evaluation Report: Texaco Gasification Process
EPA 540-R-94-514; NTIS: PB96-113899
Laboratory Study on the Use of Hot Water to Recover Light Oily Wastes from Sands
EPA 600-R-93-021; NTIS: PB93-167906
Pb 2+ and Zn2+ Adsorption by a Natural Aluminum- and Iron-Bearing Surface Coating on an Aquifer
Sand. Coston, J.T., et al. Geochemimica st Cosmocimica Acta. 59(17): 3535-3547, 1995.
EPA 600-J-95-485
Physical/Chemical Treatment Technology Resource Guide and Physical/Chemical Treatment
Technology Resource Matrix
EPA 542-B-94-008; NTIS: PB95-138665
Reductive Dehalogenation ofHexachloroethane, Carbon Tetrachloride andBromoform by
Anthrahydroquinone Disulfonate and Humic Acid. Curtis, G.P. and M. Reinhard. Environmental
Science & Technology 28(13): 2393-2401, 1994.
EPA 600-J-95-019
Remediation of Contaminated Soils by Solvent Flushing. Augustijn, D.C.M., et al. Journal of
Environmental Engineering 120(1): 42-57, Jan/Feb. 1994.
EPA 600-J-94-169, NTIS: PB94-162740
Solubilization and Microemulsiflcation of Chlorinated Solvents Using Direct Food Additive (Edible)
Surfactants. Shiau, B.J, et al. Ground Water 32(4): 561-569.
EPA 600-J-95-174
Surfactants and Subsurface Remediation. West, C.C. and J. H. Harwell. Environmental Science and
Technology 26(12): 2324-2330.
EPA 600-J-93-005; NTIS: PB93-149854
Surfactant-Enhanced DNAPL Remediation: Surfactant Selection, Hydraulic Efficiency, and Economic
Factors
EPA 600-S-96-002
Transformation of Carbon Tetrachloride by Pyrite in Aqueous Solution. Kriegman-King, M.R. and M.
Reinhard. Environmental Science and Technology 28(4): 692-700
EPA 600-J-94-349; NTIS: PB94-210465
U.S. EPA's Mobile In Situ Containment/Treatment Unit.
Videocassette from EPA, Edison, NJ
U.S. EPA's Mobile Soil Washing System.
Videocassette from EPA, Edison, NJ
Waste Vitrification Through Electric Melting: Ferro Corporation
EPA 540-F-95-503
61
-------
U.S. Army
Chemical Extraction of Heavy Metals from Contaminated Soils. Bastain, C., etal. I&EC Special
Journal, American Chemical Society, Vol. II. September 1993.
Electrokinetic Remediation: Basics and Technology Status. Acar, Y., etal. Journal of Hazardous
Materials. Vol. 39, No. 3. 1994.
Enhancement Techniques in Electrokinetic Remediation. Acar, Y., et al. Journal of Geotechnical and
Geoenvironmental Engineering. (In Review). 1993.
Evaluation of Solidification/Stabilization for Treatment of a Petroleum Hydrocarbon Contaminated
Sludge from Fort Polk Army Installation, Louisiana. Channell, M.G., et al.
NTIS: AD-A320 253/8
Evaluation of Ultraviolet/Ozone Treatment of Rocky Mountain Arsenal (RMA) Groundwater
Report No. Y-78-1
Field Demonstration of the Hot Gas Decontamination
SFIM-AEC-ET-CR-95011
Final, Technology Evaluation Report, Volumes I and II, Physical Separation and Acid Leaching: A
Demonstration of Small-Arms Range Remediation at Folk Polk, Louisiana
SFIM-AEC-ET-CR-97049
Technology Application Analysis, Physical Separation and Acid Leaching: A Demonstration of Small-
Arms Remediation at Folk Polk, Louisiana
SFIM-AEC-ET-CR-97045
TNT' Redwater Treatment by Wet Air Oxidation (Final Report)
CERL-TR-EP-95-01; NTIS: AD-A293 204/4
U.S. Navy
Terra-Kleen Extraction Technology: An Innovative Method for Treating PCBs in Soil.
NAS North Island: NELP Fact Sheet No. 2
62
-------
TECHNOLOGY SURVEY REPORTS
DOE
Albuquerque Operations Office, Albuquerque, New Mexico: Technology Summary
DOE/EM-0200; NTIS: DE95002324
Applied Research and Development Private Sector Accomplishments: Final Summary Report.
NTIS: DOE/CH-9303
Contaminant Plumes Containment and Remediation Focus Area. Technology Summary
DOE/EM-0248; NTIS: DE95016125
FY95 Technology Catalog. Technology Development for Buried Waste Remediation
NTIS: DE96001578
Heavy Metals Contaminated Soil Project, Resource Recovery Project, and Dynamic Underground
Stripping Project
DOE/EM-0129P; NTIS: DE94008861
Idaho Operations Office: Technology Summary
DOE/EM-0172P; NTIS: DE94014933
Innovation Investment Area: Technology Summary.
DOE/EM-0146P; NTIS: DE94012997
In Situ Remediation Integrated Program: Technology Summary
NTIS: DOE/EM-0134P
Minimum Additive Waste Stabilization (MAWS). Technology Summary
DOE/EM-0124P; NTIS: DE94008856
Mixed Waste Integrated Program: Technology Summary
NTIS: DOE/EM-0125P
Morgantown Energy Technology Center, Technology Summary
DOE/EM-0192T; NTIS: DE94018616
Oak Ridge Operations Office, Oak Ridge, Tennessee, Technology Summary
DOE/EM-0207; NTIS: DE95003173
Oakland Operations Office, Oakland, California: Technology Summary
DOE/EM-0222; NTIS: DE95003622
Technology Catalogue. Second Edition
DOE/EM-0235; NTIS: DE95011541
VOCs in Non-Arid Soils Integrated Demonstration: Technology Summary.
63
-------
DOE/EM-0135P; NTIS: DE94008863
EPA
Abstracts of Remediation Case Studies
EPA 542-R-95-001
Accessing EPA's Environmental Technology Programs
EPA 542-F-94-005
An Overview of UST Remediation Options
EPA 510-F-93-029
Approaches for Remediation of Federal Facility Sites Contaminated With Explosives or Radioactive
Waste
EPA 625-R-93-013
Assessing UST Corrective Action Technologies: Engineering Design of Free Product Recovery Systems.
EPA 600-R-96-031; NTIS: PB96-153556
Behavior of Metals in Soils.
EPA 540-S-92-018; NTIS: PB93-131480
Best Management Practices (BMP s) for Soil Treatment Technologies: Suggested Operational
Guidelines to Prevent Cross-Media Transfer of Contaminants During Clean-Up Activities
EPA 530-R-97-007
Bibliography for Innovative Site Clean-Up Technologies, September 1996 Update
EPA 542-B-96-003; NTIS: PB97-114193
Cleaning Up the Nation's Waste Sites: Markets and Technology Trends (1996 edition)
EPA-542-R-96-005; NTIS: PB96-178041
Compendium of Federal Facilities Cleanup Management Information
OSWER Directive 9272.0-14; EPA 540-R-98-004; NTIS: PB98-963301
Completed North America Innovative Technology Demonstration Projects
EPA 542-B-96-002; NTIS: PB96-153127
Contaminants and Remedial Options at Pesticide Sites
EPA 600-R-94-202; NTIS: PB95-183869
Contaminants and Remedial Options at Selected Metal-Contaminated Sites
EPA 540-R-95-512; NTIS: PB95-271961
Contaminants and Remedial Options at Solvent-Contaminated Sites
EPA 600-R-94-203; NTIS: PB95-177200
64
-------
Contaminants and Remedial Options at Wood Preserving Sites
EPA 600-R-92-182; NTIS: PB92-232222
Emerging Abiotic In Situ Remediation Technologies for Ground Water and Soil, Summary Report
EPA 542-S-95-001; NTIS: PB95-239299
Emerging Technology Program
EPA 540-F-95-502
Emerging Technology Report: Reclamation of Lead from Superfund Waste Material Using Secondary
Lead Smelters
EPA 540-R-95-504: NTIS: PB95-199022 (Project Summary: EPA 540-SR-95-504)
Engineering Bulletin: In-Situ Biodegradation Treatment
EPA 540-S-94-502
Groundwater Treatment Technologies Resource Guide
EPA 542-B-94-009; NTIS: PB95-138657
Guide to Documenting Cost and Performance for Remediation Projects
EPA 542-B-95-002; NTIS: PB95-182960
How to Evaluate Alternative Cleanup Technologies For Underground Storage Tank Sites: A Guide For
Corrective Action Plan Reviewers
EPA 510-B-94-003
Initiatives to Promote Innovative Technologies in Waste Management Programs
EPA 540-F-96-012; NTIS PB96-963245
In Situ Technologies for Remediation of Organic Chemicals-Contaminated Sites: A Critical Review
EPA 600-A-94-143; NTIS: PB94-192713
Light Nonaqueous Phase Liquids
EPA 540-S-95-500; NTIS: PB95-267738
Literature Review Summary of Metals Extraction Processes Used to Remove Lead from Soils: Project
Summary
EPA 600-SR-94-006
Musts for USTs: a Summary of the Regulations for Underground Tank Systems
EPA 510-K-95-002
Natural Attenuation ofHexavalent Chromium in Ground Water and Soils
EPA 540-S-94-505; NTIS: PB95-182614
Physical/Chemical Treatment Technology Resource Guide
EPA 542-B-94-008; NTIS: PB95-138665
65
-------
Profile of Innovative Technologies and Vendors for Waste Site Remediation
EPA 542-R-94-002; NTIS: PB95-138418
Progress in Reducing Impediments to the Use of Innovative Remediation Technology
EPA 542-F-95-008; NTIS: PB95-262556
Recent Developments for In Situ Treatment of Metal Contaminated Soils
PB96-153135
Regional Remediation Market Study: Northeast Remediation Marketplace: Business Opportunities For
Innovative Technologies (Summary Proceedings)
EPA 542-R-94-001; NTIS: PB94-154770
Regional Remediation Market Study: Rocky Mountain Remediation Marketplace: Business
Opportunities For Innovative Technologies (Summary Proceedings)
EPA 542-R-94-006; NTIS: PB95-173738
Regional Remediation Market Study: West Coast Remediation Marketplace: Business Opportunities
For Innovative Technologies (Summary Proceedings)
EPA 542-R-94-008; NTIS: PB95-143319
Regional Remediation Market Study: Regional Market Opportunities For Innovative Site Cleanup
Technologies: Middle Atlantic States
EPA 542-R-95-010; NTIS: PB96-121637
Regional Remediation Market Study: Market Opportunities For Innovative Site Cleanup Technologies:
Southeastern States
EPA 542-R-96-007
Remediation Case Studies: Bioremediation
EPA 542-R-95-002; NTIS: PB95-182911
Remediation Case Studies: Groundwater Treatment
EPA 542-R-95-003; NTIS: PB95-182929
Remediation Case Studies: Soil Vapor Extraction
EPA 542-R-95-004; NTIS: PB95-182937
Remediation Case Studies: Thermal Desorption, Soil Washing, and In Situ Vitrification
EPA 542-R-95-005; NTIS: PB95-182945
Remediation Technologies Screening Matrix and Reference Guide: Second Edition
EPA 542-B-94-013; NTIS: PB95-104782
Remediation Technologies Screening Matrix and Reference Guide (Fact Sheet)
EPA 542-F-95-002
Role of Cost in the Superfund Remedy Selection Process
EPA 540-F-96-018; NTIS: PB96-963245
66
-------
Selected EPA Products and Assistance on Alternative Cleanup Technologies (Includes Remediation
Guidance Documents Produced by the Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources)
EPA 510-E-94-001
Soil Screening Guidance: User's Guide
EPA 540-R-96-018; NTIS: PB96-963505; Fact Sheet: EPA 540-F-95-041
Soil Vapor Extraction Treatment Technology Resource Guide
EPA 542-B-94-007
Subsurface Characterization and Monitoring Techniques
EPA 625-R-93-003A&B
Superfund Innovative Technology Evaluation (SITE) Program: An Engineering Analysis of the
Demonstration Program
EPA 540-R-94-530
Superfund Innovative Technology Evaluation Program: Annual Report to Congress, FY1997
EPA 540-R-98-503
Superfund Innovative Technology Evaluation (SITE) Program — Emerging Technology Program
EPA 540-F-95-502
Superfund Innovative Technology Evaluation Program — SITE Program Fact Sheet
OSWER Directive 9330.1-03FS
The Superfund Innovative Technology Evaluation Program: Technology Profiles, Ninth Edition
EPA 540-R-97-502
Technology Alternatives for the Remediation of PCB-Contaminated Soil and Sediment
EPA 540-S-93-506
Treatment Technologies for Site Cleanup: Ninth Annual Status Report
EPA 542-R-99-001
Treatment Technologies for Superfund (Training Manual)
EPA 540-R-95-056; NTIS: PB95-963237
U.S. Army
FY 99 Annual Report, Pollution Prevention and Environmental Technology Division, U.S. Army
Environmental Center
SFIM-AEC-ET-TR-99070
Heavy Metal Soil Contamination at U.S. Army Installations: Proposed Research and Strategy for
Technology Development.
TR-IRRD-94-1
67
-------
Technology Assessment of Currently Available and Developmental Techniques for Heavy Metals-
Contaminated Soils Treatment.
WES: IRRP-93-4
Demonstration Results ofPhytoremediation of Explosives-Contaminated Groundwater Using
Constructed Wetlands at the Milan Army Ammunition Plant, Milan Tennessee
SFIM-AECET-CR-97059
Results of the 1998 Field Demonstration and Preliminary Implementation Guidance for
Phytoremediation of Lead-Contaminated Soil at the Twin Cities Army Ammunition Plant, Ar den Hills,
Minnesota
SFIM-AEC-ET-CR-99001
VenturiNortex Scrubber Technology for Controlling/Recycling Chromium Electroplating Emissions
U.S. Army Construction Engineering Research Laboratory Technical Report 99/43
Draft Protocol for Evaluating, Selecting, and Implementing Monitored Natural Attenuation at
Explosives-Contaminated Sites
Technical Report EL-99-10
The Tri-Service Site Characterization and Analysis Penetrometer System-SCAPS: Innovative
Environmental Technology from Concept to Commercialization
SFIM-AEC-ET-TR-99073
U.S. Navy
Environmental Cleanup Technology Transfer Initiatives.
NFESC: TR-2023-ENV
MTADS Live Site Demonstration, Pueblo ofLaguna, NM
NRL/PU/61 10-00-398
MTADS TECHEVAL Demonstration
NRL/PU/61 10-97-348
Results of the MTADS Technology Demonstration #2 at the Magnetic Test range at the Marine Corps
Air Ground Combat Center (MCAGCC), Twentynine Palms, CA
NRL/PU/61 10-97-349
Results of the MTADS Technology Demonstration #3, Jefferson Proving Ground, Madison, IL
NRL/PU/6 110-99-375
MTADS Mapping and Ordnance Investigation at the Former Ft. Pierce Amphibious Base, Vero Beach,
FL
NRL/PU/61 10-99-372
68
-------
DoD
Feasibility Study ofSorbent Treatment for Hazardous Wastes-Phase IV Clay Mixture Sorbent On-Site
Demonstration
CDRL No. AGIO
Air Force
Evaluation of PilotScale Pulse-Corona-Induced Plasma Device to Remove NOx from Combustion
Exhausts from a Subscale Combustor and from a Hush House at Nellis AFB, Nevada
AL/EQ-TR1997-0022
ETSCP
A Treatability Test for Evaluating the Potential Applicability of the Reductive Anaerobic Biological In
Situ Treatment Technology (RABITT) to Remediate Chloroethenes
Available on ESTCP's website at www.estcp.org/technical_documents.htm
ESTCP Cost and Performance Reports
Assessment of the Remote Minefield Detection System (REMIDS), September 1999
High Resolution Seismic Reflection to Characterize and Plan Remediation at Hazardous Waste
Sites, October 1999
Joint Small Arms Range Remediation, September 1997
Multi-Sensor Towed Array Detection System (MTADS), September 1999
Natural Attenuation of Explosives in Groundwater, June 1999
Permeable Reactive Wall Remediation of Chlorinated Hydrocarbons in Groundwater, July 1999
POL Sensor Validation of SCAPS, March 1997
The Use of Constructed Wetlands to Phytoremediate Explosives-Contaminated Groundwater at
the Milan Army Ammunition Plant, Milan, Tennessee, July 1999
Fury: Robotic In-Situ Inspection/Condition Assessment System for Underground Storage
Tanks, August 1999
Thermal Spray Removal of Lead-Containing Paint on Steel Structures, June 1999
Venturi/Vortex Scrubber & Pushed Liquid Recirculation System for Controlling/Recycling
Chromium Electroplating Emissions, June 1999
Waste Acid Detoxification and Reclamation Cost and Performance Report, April 1999
Advanced Non-toxic Silicone Fouling-release Coatings Cost and Performance Report, May
1999
Non-Ozone Depleting Mobile Heat Pump, January 2000
Shock-Absorbing Concrete (SACON) Bullet Traps for Small-Arms Ranges, September 1999
Spent Acid Recovery Using Diffusion Dialysis, September 1999
All ESTCP Cost and Performance Reports are available on the ESTCP website at
69
-------
www.estcp.org/technical_documents.htm
ESTCP Test Protocols
Draft Treatability Test for In-Situ Anaerobic Dechlorination (RABITT) February 1998
Draft Air Sparging Design Paradigm June 1999
Draft Protocol for Evaluating, Selecting, and Implementing
Monitored Natural Attenuation at Explosives-Contaminated Sites Technical Report EL-99-10
All ESTCP Test Protocols are available on the ESTCP website at
www.estcp.org/technical_documents.htm
70
-------
THERMAL PROCESSES
DOE
Evaluation of the Molten Salt Oxidation Process Technology
DOE/ID/12584-97, GJPO-105
Flameless Thermal Oxidation. Innovative Technology Summary Report
DOE/EM-0287; NTIS: DE96-009312
EPA
Applications Analysis Report (SITE Program): Thermal Desorption Unit, Eco Logic International, Inc.
EPA 540-AR-94-504
Demonstration Bulletin: Low Temperature Thermal Aeration (LTTA) System, Canonis Environmental
Services, Inc.
EPA 540-MR-93-504
Demonstration Bulletin: Thermal Desorption System, Clean Berkshires, Inc.
EPA 540-MR-94-507
Demonstration Bulletin: X-TRAXModel 200 Thermal Desorption System, Chemical Waste Management
Inc.
EPA 540-MR-93-502
Emerging Technology Bulletin: Development of a Photothermal Detoxification Unit
EPA 540-F-95-505; Full Report: EPA 540-R-95-526; NTIS: PB95-255733
Summary Report: EPA 540-SR-95-526
Engineering Bulletin: Thermal Desorption Treatment
EPA 540-S-94-501; NTIS: PB94-160603
EPA SITE Demonstration of the Sonotech Frequency-Tunable Pulse Combustion System. Volume 2
EPA 600-A-95-038; NTIS: PB95-190526
Innovative Technology Evaluation Report: In Situ Steam Enhanced Recovery Process, Hughes
Environmental Systems, Inc.
EPA 540-R-94-510; NTIS: PB95-271854; SITE Technology Capsule: EPA 540-R-94-510A; NTIS:
PB95-270476
Innovative Technology Evaluation Report: Radio Frequency Heating Technology, IIT'Research
Institute
EPA 540-R-94-527; NTIS: PB95-267084; SITE Technology Capsule: EPA 540-R-94-527A; NTIS:
PB95-231254
71
-------
Innovative Technology Evaluation Report: Radio Frequency Heating, KAI Technologies, Inc.
EPA 540-R-94-528; NTIS: PB95-249454; SITE Technology Capsule: EPA 540-R-94-528A; NTIS:
PB95-249454
Innovative Technology Evaluation Report: Sonotech Pulse Combustion System
EPA 540-R-95-502; SITE Technology Capsule: EPA 540-R-95-502A; Demonstration Bulletin:
EPA 540-MR-95-502
Innovative Treatment Technology Status Report: Thermal Enhancements
EPA 542-K-94-009
SITE Technology Capsule: Clean Berkshires, Inc., Thermal Desorption System
EPA 540-R-94-507A; NTIS: PB95-122800
72
-------
TREATABILITY STUDIES
EPA
Engineering Forum Issue: Considerations in Deciding to Treat Contaminated Unsaturated Soils In Situ
EPA 540-S-94-500; NTIS: PB94-177771
Feasibility Study Analysis for CERCLA Sites with Volatile Organic Compounds in Soil
EPA 540-R-94-080; NTIS: PB95-963302
Feasibility Study Analysis: Volume 1, Findings and Analysis
EPA 542-X-95-001
Feasibility Study Analysis: Volume 2, Site Summaries
EPA 542-X-95-002
Guide for Conducting Treatability Studies under CERCLA: Biodegradation Remedy Selection
EPA 540-R-93-519A; NTIS: PB94-117470
Removal ofPCBsfrom Contaminated Soil Using the CF Systems Solvent Extraction Process: A
Treatability Study
EPA 540-R-95-505; NTIS: PB95-199030; Project Summary: EPA 540-SR-95-505
Temperature, Radioactive Tracer, and Noise Logging for Injection Well Integrity
EPA 600-R-94-124
U.S. Army
Use of Activated Carbon for the Treatment of Explosive-Contaminated Groundwater at Picatinny
Arsenal. (Final Report).
NTIS: AD-A-304160
UV/Chemical Oxidation Treatment of RDX Contaminated Waters at Picatinny Arsenal.
WES: EL-95-7
73
-------
This page intentionally left blank.
74
-------
APPENDIX
TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM CONTACTS
U.S. Department of Defense
U.S. AIR FORCE
GENERAL INFORMATION:
Col. Richard Drawbaugh
Office of Environment, Safety and Occupational Health
703-697-0997
RESEARCH PROGRAMS:
Dr. Jimmy Cornette
AF Research Laboratory, Airbase and Environmental Technology Division
850-283-6007
U.S. ARMY
GENERAL INFORMATION:
Rick Newsome
Office of the Assistant Secretary for Installations, Logistics and Environment
703-614-9531
RESEARCH PROGRAMS AND
GRANTS INFORMATION:
Dr. Clem Meyer
USAGE Research and Development Directorate
202-761-1850
DEMONSTRATION PROGRAMS:
Dr. Donna Kuroda
USAGE Environmental Restoration Division
AEC
202-761-4335
Jim Arnold
USAEC P2 & Environmental Technology Division
410-436-2466
U.S. NAVY
DEMONSTRATION PROGRAMS:
Ted Zagrobelny
Naval Environmental Leadership Program
703-325-8176
A-l
-------
U.S. Department of Energy
RESEARCH PROGRAMS:
Office of Technology Development
301-903-7911
DEMONSTRATION PROGRAMS:
Office of Technology Development
301-903-7917
SMALL BUSINESS TECHNOLOGY INTEGRATION:
Office of Technology Development
301-903-7449
COOPERATIVE RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENTS:
Office of Technology Development
301-903-7900
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
GENERAL INFORMATION:
Site Cleanup Technologies:
Technology Innovation Office
703-603-9910
Cleanup Technologies for Sites Contaminated with Radioactive Material:
Office of Radiation Programs
202-654-9350
RESEARCH PROGRAMS:
General Information:
National Risk Management Research Laboratory
513-569-7418
Grants Information:
National Center for Environmental Research and Quality Assurance (NCERQA)
202-260-4073
COOPERATIVE RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENTS:
National Risk Management Research Laboratory
513-569-7960
A-2
------- |