United States
Environmental Protection
Agency
Solid Waste and
Emergency Response
(5102G)
EPA 542-F-00-020
December 2000
www.epa.gov/tio
clu-in.org
Treatment Experiences at RCRA Corrective Actions
Introduction
The RCRA Corrective Action program addresses cleanup of
existing contamination at operating industrial facilities.
Cleanup of these facilities is one of the U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency's (EPA) highest priorities. The RCRA
Cleanup Reforms1, announced in 1999, are designed to
achieve faster, more efficient cleanups at RCRA sites that
treat, store, or dispose of hazardous waste and have
potential environmental contamination. Information about
treatment experiences at corrective action sites will help
EPA, states, and the regulated community better understand
the types of cleanup technologies available, and how the
technologies are being used.
How Sites Were Selected
This fact sheet summarizes information about the use of
treatment technologies at 30 RCRA corrective action sites.
EPA identified these sites based on readily available
sources of information. These sources were reviewed to
identify RCRA sites that had ongoing or completed
cleanups for contaminated soil or groundwater, and that
identified key information about the cleanups, such as type
of technology used and point of contact.
These sites illustrate the types of cleanups conducted at
RCRA corrective actions; they are not intended to be
representative of the whole universe of RCRA cleanups.
Summary of Information
Table 1 summarizes information about treatment
experiences at the 30 RCRA corrective action sites. These
projects, described in Table 2, include both in situ and ex
situ treatment technologies, and both innovative and
conventional processes.
As shown in Table 2, these corrective action sites include a
wide range of industries, such as wood treaters, chemical
plants, refineries, paper mills, manufacturing facilities, and
waste treatment facilities. The sites vary in size,
complexity, and types of contaminants. Contaminants
include chlorinated solvents; polycyclic aromatic
hydrocarbons (PAHs); benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, and
xylenes (BTEX); other volatile and semivolatile organic
compounds (VOCs and SVOCs); and petroleum
hydrocarbons.
Table 1: Summary of Treatment Experiences
Treatment Technology
No. of Sites
In Situ
Air Sparging
Bioventing
Bioremediation (in situ groundwater)
Bioremediation (in situ soil)
Chemical Oxidation (in situ)
Permeable Reactive Barriers
Soil Vapor Extraction
1
2
1
3
2
2
7
Ex Situ
Bioremediation (ex situ)
Pump and Treat
Thermal Desorption
6
5
1
Of the 30 corrective actions, 12 are completed cleanups,
and 18 are operational (at the time data were collected for
this summary). For the completed projects, contaminant
concentrations in soil after treatment included
chlorobenzene - 0.002 mg/kg; PAHs -100 mg/kg; phenol -
330 mg/kg; and trichloroethene (TCE) - below detection
levels; treated groundwater concentrations included total
petroleum hydrocarbon (TPH) - 300 ug/L.
Examples of projects listed in Table 2 are provided below.
Additional information about the RCRA Cleanup Reforms is
available at www.epa.gov/epaoswer/hazwaste/ca/reforms.htm
Amoco Refinery, MO - Composting
At this site, composting-an ex situ bioremediation
technology-was used to treat soil. The project was
completed in eight years, and the concentration of PAHs
was reduced from over 1,000 mg/kg to less than 300
mg/kg, meeting the cleanup goal at the site.
Safety Kleen Argonite Site, KS - Permeable Reactive
Barrier
At this site, a permeable reactive barrier has been used
for over four years to treat groundwater in situ. The
PRB is a funnel and gate design, containing 225 tons of
zero-valent iron, and is being used to treat chlorinated
solvents.
Superior Tube Site, PA - Soil Vapor Extraction
At this site, a pilot study of soil vapor extraction has
been operating since February 2000 to extract TCE from
bedrock at depths of more than 60 feet below the
surface. If this pilot project is successful, site managers
will implement the technology at full scale.
| Mention of trade names or commercial products does not constitute endorsement or recommendation for use. \
-------
Table 2. Treatment Experiences at RCRA Corrective Action Sites
Site Name,
Location (RCRA
Facility ID No.)
Contaminants
Media
Technology (Scale/Description)
Period of
Performance
(POP) / Status
Performance (Cleanup
Goal/Target; Initial and Final
or Current Concentration)
Contact
Sources1
AIR SPARGING
Burlington
Northern, MN
(MND000686204)
Creosote, Phenol
Groundwater
Scale: Full; Additional information not provided
in source.
POP not
provided /
Operational
Information not provided in
source.
Linda Kern, USEPA,
312-886-7341,
kern, linda@epa.gov
ASR
BIOREMEDIATION (BIOVENTING)
Atlantic Research
Corporation, VA
(VAD023741705)
Hill Air Force Base,
UT
(UT0571724350)
Chlorobenzene
Benzene, Toluene,
Ethlybenzene, Xylene
(BTEX), Total
Recoverable Petroleum
Hydrocarbons (TRPH)
Soil
Soil
Scale: Pilot (as interim measure); Ammonia
phosphate nutrients added to above-ground cells;
Air Flow Rate: 100 std. cubic feet per minute;
Treatment of Vapors: None (vented to
atmosphere without treatment).
Scale: Pilot; No. of Bioventing Wells : 1;
Additional information not provided in source.
9/89-5/90 /
Complete
6/92-Present /
Operational
Initial: 2,200 mg/kg
Target: 50 mg/kg
Final: 0.002 mg/kg
TRPH:
Initial: 13,200 mg/kg
Target: 1,000 mg/kg
Current: Not provided
Linda Holden, USEPA,
215-814-3428,
holden. linda@epa.gov
Robert Stites, USEPA,
303-312-6756,
stites. rob@epa.gov
BFSS
BFSS
IN SITU BIOREMEDIATION (GROUNDWATER)
Savannah River
Site, SC
(SCI 890008989)
Trichloroethene (TCE),
Vinyl chloride (VC)
Groundwater
Scale: Full (Interim Action); No. of
Extraction/Injection Wells: 2 horizontally
oriented (0.25 miles long); Depth of Wells: 60 ft;
Types of Amendments Added:
air/methane/triethylphosphate/nitrous oxide
mixture.
8/99-Present /
Operational
TCE:
Initial: 60 ug/L
Target: 5 ug/L
Current: 10 ug/L
VC:
Initial: 100 ug/L
Target: 2 ug/L
Current: 80 ug/L
James Kupar, WSRC,
803-952-6525,
james.kupar@SRS.gov
ASR
IN SITU BIOREMEDIATION (SOIL)
A.B. Dick, IL
(ILR000060103)
Aristech Chemical,
OH
(OHD005108477)
Dichloroethene,
Polycyclic Aromatic
Hydrocarbons (PAH),
Trichloroethane (TCA),
TCE
Phenol
Soil
Soil
Scale: Full; Depth of Treatment: 15 ft; Types of
Amendments Added: De-halogenation
components; Additional Comment: No turning
or air injection was used.
Scale: Full; Depth of Treatment: 16 ft; Types of
Amendments Added: Ammonia nitrate and
Munox lOx SeriesV bacteria.
1995 /Complete
1994 /Complete
PAH:
Initial: 1,500 mg/kg
Target: 160 mg/kg
Final: <0.1 mg/kg
Phenol:
Initial: 32,000 mg/kg
Target: 2,740 mg/kg
Final: 330 mg/kg
David Frycek, Inland
Environmental, Inc.,
847-677-7500,
dfrycek@inlandenv. com
Jim Fain, Environmental
Manager, Aristech
Chemical Company,
740-533-5412,
fainje@aristechchem.
com
BFSS
BFSS
-------
Table 2. Treatment Experiences at RCRA Corrective Action Sites (continued)
Site Name,
Location (RCRA.
Facility ID No.)
Federated Paint
Manufacturing
Company, Inc., IL
(ILD021293717)
Contaminants
Tetrachloroethene
(PCE), TCE,
Dichloroethene (DCE),
Dichloroethane (DCA)
Media
Soil
Technology (Scale/Description)
Scale: Full; Depth of Treatment: 18 ft; Types of
Amendments Added: Formulation of electron
acceptors and donors designed to promote
accelerated biodegradation.
Period of
Performance
(POP) /Status
1992 /Complete
Performance (Cleanup
Goal/Target; Initial and Final
or Current Concentration)
Initial
PCE: 810 mg/kg
TCE: 170 mg/kg
DCE: 125 mg/kg
DCA: 65 mg/kg
Target: 1 mg/kg
Final: <0.1 mg/kg (for all
contaminants)
Contact
David Frycek, Inland
Environmental, Inc.,
847-677-7500,
dfrycek@mlandenv. com
Sources1
E-mail
IN SITU CHEMICAL OXIDATION
NAS Pensacola, FL
(HF-292641)2
Site 11,NSB Kings
Bay, GA
(GA4170090001)
cis -Dichloroethene (cis-
DCE), TCE, VC
cis-DCE, PCE, TCE
Groundwater
Groundwater
Scale: Full; Number of Injection Wells: 15; Depth
of Treatment: 7 to 40 ft; Type of Amendments
Added: 50% hydrogen peroxide and 50% ferrous
iron catalyst solution; Additional Comments: In
situ chemical oxidation treatment was used to
reduce the source area concentrations and to
facilitate the use of MNA as the final remedy.
Scale: Full; Number of Injection Wells: 23; Depth
of Treatment: 32 to 42 ft; Type of Amendments
Added: 50% hydrogen peroxide and 50% ferrous
iron catalyst solution; Additional Comments: In
situ chemical oxidation treatment was used to
reduce the source area concentrations and to
facilitate the use of MNA as the final remedy.
1998 /Complete
1998 /Complete
Initial
cis-DCE: 500 ug/L
TCE: 3,600 ug/L
VC: 63 ug/L
Target: Not Provided
Final
cis-DCE: 18 ug/L
TCE: 180 ug/L
VC: <5 ug/L
Initial
cis-DCE: 60 ug/L
PCE: 8,500 ug/L
TCE: 550 ug/L
Target in Source Area: 100 ug/L
(total CVOCs)
Final
cis-DCE: <1 ug/L
PCE: 69 ug/L
TCE: 2 ug/L
Maxie Keisler, Southern
Division NAVFAC,
843-820-7322,
keislermr@efdsouth.
navfac.navy.mil, Mike
Maughon, Southern
Division NAVFAC,
843-820-7422,
maughonmj@efdsouth.
navfac.navy.mil
Anthony Robinson,
Southern Division
NAVFAC, 843-820-
7339,
robinsonab@efdsouth.
navfac.navy.mil
Cliff Casey, Southern
Division NAVFAC,
843-820-5561,
caseycc@efdsouth.
navfac.navy.mil
Report,
FRTR
Report,
FRTR
PERMEABLE REACTIVE BARRIER
Safety Kleen
Argonite, Inc., KS
(KSD981506025)
PCE, TCE
Groundwater
Scale: Full; Type of Barrier: Funnel and Gate,
Length: 4,000ft, Width: 3 ft (funnel) and 10 ft
(gate); Depth: 30 ft (funnel and gate); Type and
Quantity of Reactive Media: 225-tons of
zero-valent iron.
1/96-Present /
Operational
Information not provided in
source.
Gregg Somermyer,
Thermo Retec,
970-493-3700,
gsomermyer@
thermoretec.com
GWRTAC
-------
Table 2. Treatment Experiences at RCRA Corrective Action Sites (continued)
Site Name,
Location (RCRA.
Facility ID No.)
U.S. Coast Guard
Support Center, NC
(NC2690308232)
Contaminants
Chromium*5 (Cr*),
TCE
Media
Groundwater
Technology (Scale/Description)
Scale: Full; Type of Barrier: Continuous Wall;
Length: 152ft, Width: 2 ft, Depth of Barrier:
Began 4-8 ft bgs and extended to 24 ft bgs; Type
and Quantity of Reactive Media: 450-tons of
zero-valent iron.
Period of
Performance
(POP) /Status
6/96-Present /
Operational
Performance (Cleanup
Goal/Target; Initial and Final
or Current Concentration)
Cr«:
Initial: >3,430 ug/L
Target: 100 ug/L
Current: 0.1 ug/L
TCE:
Initial: 74,320 ug/L
Target: 5 ug/L
Current: 548 ug/L
Contact
Robert Puls, USEPA,
580-436-8543,
puls. robert@epa.gov,
Jim Vardy, US Coast
Guard, 919-335-6847
Sources1
FRTR
SOIL VAPOR EXTRACTION
Evanite Fiber
Corporation, OR
(ORD009023466)
General Motors
Corporation, WV
(WVD044145209)
IBM, VA
(VAD064872575)
IBM, VT
(VTD002084705)
Merck & Company,
Inc., PA
(PAD0023 87926)
TCE
Ethylbenzene,
Naphthalene, PCE
DCE, PCE, TCE
Acetone, DCE, PCE,
Toluene, TCE, Xylenes
Chloroform
Soil
Soil
Soil
Soil
Soil
Scale: Full; No. of Extraction Wells: 8; Depth of
Wells: 40 ft; Above-Ground Treatment
Technologies: None; Additional Comments:
SVE system used pulse pumping to reduce intake
ofGW.
Scale: Full; No. of Extraction Wells: 15(6
inches in dia.); Depth of Wells: 30 ft (20 ft long
screens); Vapor Extraction Flow Rate: 257 cfm;
Above-Ground Treatment Technologies : Vapors
treated by a thermal destruction unit and water is
treated by carbon canisters; Additional
Comments: Only 8 extraction wells are currently
active.
Scale: Full; No. of Extraction Wells: 6; Depth of
Wells: 60-150 ft; Vapor Extraction Flow Rate:
25-30 scfm; Above-Ground Treatment
Technologies : Air flushing; Additional
Comments: P&T also used on site.
Scale: Full; No. of Extraction Wells: 50, Depth
of Wells: Most less than 20 ft.
Scale: Full; No. of Extraction Wells: 6; Depth of
Wells: 28-98 ft; Above-Ground Treatment
Technologies: GAC system; Additional
Comment: P&T also used on site.
90-Present /
Operational
9/96-Present /
Operational
89-Present /
Operational
93-Present /
Operational
90-9/98 (P&T
continues) /
Complete
22% of the 56 tons of TCE has
been extracted by SVE (57% by
P&T and 21% through DNAPL
recovery)
Information not provided in
source.
Initial: l,800mg/kg
Target: Not provided
Current: 23 mg/kg
Information not provided in
source.
Initial: 5,000 mg/L
Target: Not Provided
Final: 1,600 mg/L
Jim Billings, Oregon
Department of
Environmental Quality,
503-378-8240,
billings. jim@deq.
state. or.us
Mike Jacobi, USEPA,
215-814-3435,
jacobi.mike@epa.gov
Diane Schott, USEPA,
215-814-3430,
schott. diane@epa.gov
Micheal Smith, Vermont
Ag. Natural Res.
(VTANR),
802-241-3879,
MikeS@DEC.ANR.
State.VT.US
Renee Gelblat, USEPA,
215-814-3421,
gelblat. renee@epa.gov
ASR
ASR
ASR
ASR
ASR
-------
Table 2. Treatment Experiences at RCRA Corrective Action Sites (continued)
Site Name,
Location (RCRA
Facility ID No.)
Savannah River
Site, SC
(SCI 890008989)
Superior Tube
Company, PA
(PAD002353407)
Contaminants
PCE, TCE
DCE, TCE, VC
Media
Soil
Soil
(Bedrock)
Technology (Scale/Description)
Scale: Full; No. of Extraction Wells: 9; Vapor
Extraction Flow Rate: 30 to 600 scfm;
Above-Ground Treatment Technologies: None.
Scale: Pilot; No. of Extraction Wells: 5; Depth
of Wells: 60-65 ft; Vapor Extraction Flow Rate:
35-50 cfm (combined influent flow for all wells);
Above-Ground Treatment Technologies: Two
activated carbon beds extract pure TCE which is
recycled and reused by the facility; Additional
Comment: Since 2/00, approximately 2,750 Ibs of
TCE has been extracted.
Period of
Performance
(POP) /Status
95-Present /
Operational
2/00-Present /
Operational
Performance (Cleanup
Goal/Target; Initial and Final
or Current Concentration)
PCE:
Initial: Not Provided
Target: Not Provided
Current: 18.1 mg/kg
TCE:
Initial: 9,000 ug/L
Target: 5 ug/L
Current: 900 ug/L (TCE is
sample from air)
DCE&VC:
Secondary contaminants of
concern. Cleanup performance
for both is based on TCE
cleanup performance.
Contact
Joseph Amari,
Westinghouse (WSRC),
803-952-2981,
Joseph. amari@SRS.gov
Khai Dao, USEPA,
215-814-5467,
dao.khai@epa.gov
Sources1
ASR
ASR
EX SITU BIOREMEDIATION
Amoco Refinery,
MO
(MOD007161425 )
Hudson Refining
Company, OK
(OKD082471988)
International Paper,
MO
(MOD007129935)
Naphthalene,
Phenanthrene, Pyrene
Benzo(a)pyrene,
Benzo(a)anthracene,
Chrysene, Oil & Grease
Naphthalene,
Pentachlorophenol,
Phenanthrene, Pyrene,
Toluene, Xylenes
Soil
Soil
Soil
Scale: Full; Type of Process: Composting; Size
of Unit: 180,000 yd3; Types of Amendments
Added: Fertilizer and mulch; Additional
Comments : Land tilled to aerate and control
moisture.
Scale: Full; Type of Process: Land Treatment;
Size of Unit: 11 acres; Types of Amendments
Added: Fertilizer: 300-500 Ibs/acre/yr; soil
conditioners, and water; Additional Comments:
Soil conditioners maintained 61,000 mg/kg
Target: 300 mg/kg
Final: <300 mg/kg
Total PAHs:
Initial: Not provided
Target: 1 5 mg/kg
Curren:t Not provided
Initial Not provided (all
contaminants)
Target:
Naphthalene: 1.5 mg/kg
Pentachlorophenol: 7.4 mg/kg
Phenanthrene: 1.5 mg/kg
Pyrene: 1.5 mg/kg
Toluene: 28 mg/kg
Xylenes : Not Provided
Final: Not provided (all
contaminants)
Brian McCurren,
Missouri Department of
Natural Resources
Division of
Environmental Quality,
573-751-3176,
nrmccub@mail. dnr.
state. mo.us
David Abshire, USEPA,
214-665-7188,
abshire. charles@epa.
gov
Brian McCurren,
Missouri Department of
Natural Resources
Division of
Environmental Quality,
573-751-3176,
nrmccub@mail. dnr.
state. mo.us
BFSS
BFSS
BFSS
-------
Table 2. Treatment Experiences at RCRA Corrective Action Sites (continued)
Site Name,
Location (RCRA.
Facility ID No.)
Marvin Windows,
MN
(MND006164511)
Owens -Corning, KS
(KSD000610725)
Savannah River
Site, SC
(SCI 890008989)
Contaminants
Pentachlorophenol
(PCP), Total Petroleum
Hydrocarbons (TPH)
Formaldehyde
TPH
Media
Soil
Soil
Soil
Technology (Scale/Description)
Scale: Full; Type of Process: Biopile; Additional
Comments: Amendments enhanced indigenous
contaminant degrading microbes.
Scale: Full; Type of Process: Land Treatment;
Size of Unit: Soil stockpiled in volume 130 ft by
50 ft by 15 inches deep; Types of Amendments
Added: Ammonium phosphate; Additional
Comment: Soil BOD and COD checked weekly.
Scale: Full; Type of Process: Land Treatment;
Types of Amendments Added: Fertilizer (added
as needed); Additional Comments: Excavated soil
placed in cement trough bed, leachate collection
system redistributed collected water via sprinkler,
facility rototilled weekly.
Period of
Performance
(POP) /Status
1996 /Complete
POP: Not
provided /
Complete
3/94-Present /
Operational
Performance (Cleanup
Goal/Target; Initial and Final
or Current Concentration)
Initial: Not provided
Target:
PCP: 5 mg/kg
TPH: 10 mg/kg
Final: Not provided
Information not provided in
source.
Initial: 17,000 mg/kg
Target: 100 mg/kg
Current: 1 mg/kg
Contact
Elizabeth Gawrys,
Minnesota Pollution
Control Agency,
612-297-8376,
elizabeth.gawrys@
pca.state.mn.us
Dave Growcock,
Owens -Corning,
913-281-9545
Michelle Ewart,
Savannah River
Operations,
803-725-1115,
michelle.ewart@srs.gov
Sources1
BFSS
BFSS
BFSS
PUMP AND TREAT
Baldwin Pole and
Piling Company
Inc., AL
(ALD9821 14704)
BKK Landfill, CA
(CAD067786749)
Cavenham Forest
Industries Inc., AL
(ALD057226904)
PAH
1 ,2-dichloropropane,
Benzene, Carbon
Tetrachloride,
Chloroform,
Dichloromethane,
Phenols, Toluene, TCE,
VC
Benzene, PCP, PAH,
Toluene
Groundwater
Groundwater
Groundwater
Scale: Full; Above-Ground Treatment
Technologies : Biological treatment occurred in
three reaction chambers connected in series;
Additional Comments: Treatment lowered
constituent concentrations prior to discharge to
POTW for further treatment.
Scale: Full; Bioreactor was a leachate treatment
plant using complexation with EDTA and
flocculation; Additional information not provided
in source.
Scale: Full; Above-Ground Treatment
Technologies : Water treated in a fixed film
biological system consisting of 2 parallel units
with 4 reaction chambers each after conditioning
consisting of aeration/blending/nutrient
addition/pH adjustment.
4/91-Present/
Operational
1/87-Present /
Operational
7/93-Present /
Operational
Information not provided in
source.
Information not provided in
source.
Information not provided in
source.
Steven Cobb, Alabama
Department of
Environmental
Management Land
Division, 334-271-7739,
landmail@adem. state.
al.us
Carmen Santos,
USEP A, 41 5-744-2037,
carmen.santos@epa.
gov
Jeffery Kitchens,
Alabama Department of
Environmental
Management Land
Division, 334-271-7754,
landmail@adem. state.
al.us
BFSS
BFSS
BFSS
-------
Table 2. Treatment Experiences at RCRA Corrective Action Sites (continued)
Site Name,
Location (RCRA.
Facility ID No.)
Langdale Facility,
TN
(TND003493103)
US DOE Kansas
City, MO
(MO9890010524)
Contaminants
PAH
1,2-DCE, PCE, TCE
Media
Groundwater
Groundwater
Technology (Scale/Description)
Scale: Full; No. of Extraction Wells: 3, Depth of
Wells: 90-100 ft; Above-Ground Treatment
Technologies: Air stripping followed by
biological treatment.
Scale: Full; No. of Extraction Wells: 14 and one
interceptor trench (trench dimensions: 250 ft
long, 22-3 1 ft deep); Groundwater Extraction
Flow Rate: 0.9-5 gpm;, Above-Ground Treatment
Technologies : UV/Peroxide system.
Period of
Performance
(POP) /Status
1998-Present/
Operational
5/88-Present /
Operational
Performance (Cleanup
Goal/Target; Initial and Final
or Current Concentration)
Information not provided in
source.
Chlorinated Solvents :
Influent: 10,600 ug/L
Effluent: 10 ug/L
Target: Not provided
Contact
Charles Burroughs,
Tennessee Department
of Environmental
Conservation, Division
of Solid Waste,
615-532-0863,
cburroughs@mail.
state. tn. us
G. Phil Keary, Keary
Environmental
Restoration,
816-997-7288,
pkeary@kcp. com
Sources1
Call
FRTR
THERMAL DESORPTION
Lockheed Martin,
CO
(COD981552979)
TCE
Soil
Scale: Full; Type of System: Rotary Kiln; Type
of Process: Continuous; Temperature: 540 F;
Throughput: 10-20 tons/hr, Type of Emission
Controls/Technologies : GAC system and HEPA
filters.
9/98-1/99 /
Complete
Initial: 2,091 mg/kg
Target: Non-Detect
Final: Non-Detect
Charles Johnson,
Colorado Public Health
Envir. (CDPHE),
303-692-3348,
Johnson. charles@
state. co. us
ASR
Notes:
1 - Key to Sources:
ASR
BFSS
Treatment Technologies for Site Cleanup: Annual Status
Report (9th Edition), EPA 542-R-99-001, April 1999,
Bioremediation in the Field Search System, Version 2.1.
Not Dated,
Call Telephone communication with site contact.
E-mail E-mail communication with site contact.
FRTR Federal Remediation Technologies Roundtable, EPA 542-C-OO-OO1,
June 2000,
GWRTAC Groundwater Remediation Technologies Analysis Center, Technology
Evaluation Report, Treatment Walls, TE-96-01, October 1996,
Report Maughon, Michael J., Clifton C. Casey, J. Daniel Bryant, James T. Wilson,
Chemical Oxidation Source Reduction and Natural Attenuation For
Remediation of Chlorinated Hydrocarbons in Groundwater, The Second
International Conference on Remediation of Chlorinated and Recalcitrant
Compounds, May 22-25, 2000, Battelle Press.
2 - Hazardous Waste Facility Permit Number
-------
United States
Environmental Protection Agency
National Service Center for
Environmental Publications
P.O. Box 42419
Cincinnati, OH 45242
Official Business
Penalty for Private Use $300
EPA 542-F-00-020
December 2000
Treatment Experiences at RCRA Corrective Actions
Order Form
To order Treatment Experiences at RCRA Corrective Actions (EPA 542-F-00-020)
please call 1-800-490-9198 or complete this form and mail or fax it to:
National Service Center for Environmental Publications
P.O. Box 42419
Cincinnati, OH 45242-2419
Fax: (513)489-8695
Order on-line at
"http://www.epa.gov/ncepihom/>
or download free copies from
;
search under Publications
Name
Company
Address
City/State/Zip
Phone
Fax
E-mail
------- |