United States
Environmental Protection
Agency
Office of Solid Waste artd
Emergency Response
(5102G)
EPA 542-F-98-OO4
March 1998
v>EPA
Treatment Technology
Vendor Information Form (VIF)
Version 7.0
To be completed for participation in the
Search Engine Linking
Environmental Characterization
and Treatment Technologies
(Tech SELECTT)
Version 1-0
Note: Instead of submitting this form, you may provide information on your
technology(ies) electronically. The VIF can be completed on-line at
www.ttemi.com/techselectt. An electronic VIF can be downloaded
from EPA's CLU-IN web site (www.clu-in.com.). Or you may call the
VISITT/Vendor FACTS help line to request a hard copy.
Completion of this form is voluntary. If you
have any questions, call the Tech SELECTT
Help Line at (800) 245-4505 or (703) 287-8927
Form Approved
OMB Control No. 2050-0114
Approval expires 08/31/2000
Printed on Recycled Paper
-------
-------
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Section
I. What is the Search Engine Linking Environmental Characterization
and Treatment Technologies? i
n. Which Treatment Technologies are Eligible for Inclusion? i
m. Why Should You Participate? i
IV. Should Vendors Submit Confidential Business Information? ii
V. Submittal of Process Flow Diagrams, Schematics, or Pictures ii
VI. How Much Documentation is Required Regarding Performance and
Other Technology Claims? iii
VEL Submittal of Vendor Information Form iii
VIE. EPA's Authority for Invitation for Submittal and Burden Statement iv
DC. Treatment Technologies For Tech SELECTT (Formerly VISITT)
Treatment Technology Vendor Information Form 1
Part 1: General Information 1
Part 2: Technology Overview 3
Part 3: Full-Scale Equipment/Capabilities 14
Part 4: Pilot-Scale Equipment/Capabilities 17
Part 5: Bench-Scale or Emerging Equipment/Capabilities 19
Part 6: Representative Applications, Client References, and Performance Data .... 21
Part 7: Literature and Technical References 31
LIST OF TABLES
Table
1.1 List of Treatment Technologies of Interest ii
2.1 Contaminants/Wastes Associated With Industrial Waste Sources
or Types of Sites 13
Appendices
A BUSINESS CLASSIFICATION INFORMATION A-1
B KEY TO CONTAMINANT GROUPS B-l
-------
THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
-------
I. What is the Search Engme Linking Environmental Characterization and Treatment
Technologies?
The Search Engine Linking Environmental Characterization and Treatment Technologies
(Tech SELECTT) is a service offered by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA)
Technology Innovation Office (TIO) to promote the use of technologies for the treatment,
characterization or monitoring of contaminated ground water and soil. The predecessor
systems, VISITT Version 6.0 (371 technologies provided by 214 vendors), and Vendor
FACTS Version 3.0, (154 Technologies provided by 116 vendors) were released in January
1998. The purpose of the system is to foster communication between technology vendors
and users by providing information on the availability, performance, and cost associated with
the application of characterization and treatment technologies. Tech SELECTT is intended
to inform Federal, state, and private-sector remediation professionals of their cleanup options
and the capabilities of the firms listed in the system's database to provide remediation
services.
II, Which Treatment Technologies are Eligible for Inclusion?
Eligible technologies are those that are:
1. Innovative, that is, technologies that lack cost and performance data and currently are
not applied commonly, when then- use can provide better, more cost-effective
performance than conventional methods.
2. Designed to treat contaminated soil, sludge, sediments, solid-matrix and to treat
ground water or nonaqueous phase liquids (NAPL) in situ. (See Table 1.1)
3. In the category transportable thermal destruction or solidification/stabilization.
These two conventional technology categories are being added to the list of eligible
technologies to expand on the treatment options available to users of the system.
Treatment technologies associated with groundwater ex situ systems and incineration at a
fixed location continue to be ineligible technology categories.
Suppliers of separate components of a treatment technology (such as bacteria for
bioremediation) will not be listed in the database. EPA will determine whether a technology
is eligible for listing, if so requested by the vendor. Questions about the eligibility of a given
technology can be directed to the Tech SELECTT help line at (800) 245-4505 or (703) 287-
8927.
III. Why Should You Participate?
1. Tech SELECTT is an excellent opportunity for vendors to promote their capabilities.
The system allows the vendor to provide substantial information on the applicability,
cost, performance, and current use of their technologies. The database will be
publicly available free-of-charge on the Internet. We anticipate reaching cleanup
personnel and investors throughout the U.S. and abroad by widely advertising Tech
SELECTT in trade journals, at conferences, and through direct mailings to an
extensive list of potential users.
-------
Table 1.1
LIST OF TREATMENT TECHNOLOGIES OF INTEREST
Acid Extraction
Adsorption - In Situ
Air Sparging - In Situ Ground Water
Bioremediation - In Situ Ground Water
Bioremediation - In Situ Lagoon
Bioremediation - In Situ Soil
Bioremediation - Not Otherwise Specified
Bioremediation - Slurry Phase
Bioremediatjon - Solid Phase
Bioventing
Chemical Treatment - Dechlorination
Chemical Treatment - In Situ Ground Water
Chemical Treatment - Other
Chemical Treatment - Oxidation/Reduction
Delivery/Extraction Systems
Dual-Phase Extraction
Electrical Separation
Electro-Thermal Gasification - In Situ
Hydraulic Fracturing
Magnetic Separation
Materials Handling/Physical Separation
Off-Gas Treatment
Plasma
Pneumatic Fracturing
Pyrolysis
Slagging - Off-Gas Treated
Soil Flushing - In Situ
Soil Vapor Extraction
Soil Washing
Solidification/Stabilization
Solvent Extraction
Surfactant Enhanced Recovery - In Situ
Thermal Desorption
Thermally Enhanced Recovery - In Situ
Transportable Thermal Destruction
Vitrification
IV. Should Vendors Submit Confidential Business Information?
No. Submittal of technology information for inclusion in Tech SELECTT is voluntary, and
submittals should not include confidential business information. However, applicants may
write "available on a case-by-case basis" as their response to those questions for which they
have information, but would prefer not to make this information generally available.
For confidential projects that otherwise could not be included, applicants are encouraged to
provide "sanitized" or masked information that will allow users to review general
information on a vendor's experience, without revealing confidential information. For
instance, in Part 6, which details project experience, you may provide a generic industry
name, such as "organic chemical manufacturer" instead of the actual site name.
V. Submittal of Process Flow Diagrams, Schematics, or Pictures
Vendors should provide a flow chart, schematic, or picture of the treatment process or
equipment. To ensure that schematics are legible in the final system, EPA recommends that
schematics be submitted in an Encapsulated Postscript (EPS), Bitmap (BMP), Tag Image
File (TIF) or Zsoft PC Paintbrush Bitmap (PCX) electronic format. If no electronic copy is
available, a camera-ready hard copy suitable for computer scanning is acceptable.
n
-------
VI. How Much Documentation is Required Regarding Performance and Other Technology
Claims?
The treatment technology portion of Tech SELECTT is a service provided by EPA to
showcase vendor's technologies and capabilities. Therefore, it is in the applicant's best
interest to fill out each part of VIF as completely as possible since incomplete information
may discourage users from considering the technology further.
EPA will review each submittal for clarity, completeness, and adherence to instructions and
may contact vendors to clarify information submitted. If the Agency makes any substantive
changes to the submittal the respondent will be given the opportunity to review and
comment, with one exception: EPA may list publicly-available information or references on
Superfund sites or Federal facilities at which the vendor's technology has been used.
The Agency will not review submitted data for accuracy or quality; to do so would be too
resource intensive and subjective, and would substantially delay dissemination of the
database. Tech SELECTT will clearly state that vendors have supplied the information, and
that the data have not been verified by the Agency. Applicants should expect that interested
users may request additional information regarding applicability and performance of a
particular technology. The database will contain the following disclaimer:
"Inclusion in the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's Tech SELECTT database
does not mean that the Agency approves, recommends, licenses, certifies, or
authorizes the use of any of the technologies. Nor does the Agency certify the
accuracy of the data. This listing means only that the vendor has,provided
information on a technology that EPA considers to be eligible for inclusion in this
database."
VII. Submittal of Vendor Information Form
Instead of submitting this form, it is recommended that you use the on-line VIF at
www.ttemi.com/techselectt for submitting your technology for inclusion in Tech SELECTT.
However, there are several other ways you may provide information on your technology(ies).
The VIF can be downloaded from the Tech SELECTT homepage at
www.ttemi.com/techselectt or from the EPA's Cleanup Information (CLU-IN) web site at
www.clu-in.com. You can also obtain the VIF by electronic mail. Send your request to
visitt@ttemi.com. A hard copy of the VIF can be obtained by calling the Tech SELECTT
help line at (800) 245-4505. The VIF may also be handwritten and submitted to the address
below.
System Operator, Tech SELECTT
Tetra Tech EM, Inc.
1593 Spring Hill Road, Suite 300
Vienna, VA 22182
111
-------
VIII. EPA's Authority for Invitation for Submittal and Burden Statement
EPA's authority for conducting this invitation for submittal is set forth under section 311 of
the Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization Act of 1986 (42 United States Code
(U.S.C.) 9601 et seq.). Under section 311, EPA may collect and disseminate information
related to the use of treatment technologies for remediation of hazardous waste sites.
EPA estimates that the burden of reporting on the vendor for this collection of information
will average 25 hours for each original submittal and 13 hours for submittal of an update.
These estimates include the time applicants will require to review and maintain necessary
data and to complete and review the VEF. Comments about this estimate of burden, or any
other issue or concern related to reduction of the burden, should be sent to Chief,
Information Policy Branch, PM-223, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 401 M Street,
SW, Washington, DC 20460 and to Paperwork Reduction Project (OMB#2050-0114), Office
of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Office of Management and Budget, Washington, DC
20503.
IV
-------
IX. TREATMENT TECHNOLOGIES FOR
TECH SELECTT
(FORMERLY VISlTT)
TREATMENT TECHNOLOGY VENDOR INFORMATION FORM 7.0
PART1: GENERAL INFORMATION
Part 1 contains questions about general information Oh your company. Part 1 must be completed
for a technology to be included in Tech SELECTT.
1.1 Date Submitted _ / .....,./ ... .
1.2 DevelOpef/Veridbf Name
1.3a Is this an update of a technology listed in VlSlTT Version 6.0? Yes Q No Q
If yes, specify technology and vendor name that appeared in VlSlTT Version 6.0 if different
from the information in this update.
For VlSlTT Versiori 6.0 Vendors: Questions 1.3b and 1.3c are intended to gather information
on the use Of VlSlTT in the remediation community.
1.3b Please provide ah estimate Of the frequency of inquiries your company has received
through your inclusion in VlSlTT; (value) ....... (unit)
1.3d Has your company performed Work, such as a treatability study, pilot-scale study, or field
demonstration, as a result of those inquiries. Ql Yes Q No
Please provide details, if possible.
1.4 Please list your primary Standard Industrial Classification (SIC) code and check the
appropriate business classification for each code. Refer to Appendix A for business
classification definitions.
SIC code_
SIC code
Small LJ Other Than Small LJ Disadvantaged/Minority LJ Women-owned
-------
Vendor Name
Technology Type
PART 1: GENERAL INFORMATION (continued)
1.5 Street Address
1.6 City
1.7 State/Province
1.8 Zip Code
1.9 Country
1.10 a. Contact Name(s) Prefix:
First Name:
Last Name:
Suffix:
b. Contact Title(s)
1.11 Contact Phone ( )
ext.
1.12 Fax Number ( )
1.13 Internet E-mail Address
1.14 Home Page Address
-------
Vendor Name
Technology Type
PART 2: TECHNOLOGY OVERVIEW
Part 2 asks questions about the technology type, trade name, patent information, technology
description, highlights, limitations, media treated, contaminants treated as well as other general
questions related to a vendor's technology. Part 2 must be completed for a technology to be
included in Tech SELECTT.
2.1 Vendor Services. Check all that apply.
2.2
2.3
LJ Equipment manufacturer
LJ Subcontractor for cleanup services
LJ Prime contractor for full-service remediation
LJ Technology sales
LJ Technology rentals or leases
LJ Other (specify)
Technology Type. Check
LJ Acid Extraction
LJI Adsorption - In Situ
LJ Air Sparging - In
Situ Ground Water
LJ Bioremediation - In
Situ Ground Water
LJ Bioremediation - In
Situ Lagoon
LJ Bioremediation - In
Situ Soil
LJ Bioremediation -
Not Otherwise
Specified
LJ Bioremediation -
Slurry Phase
LJ Bioremediation -
Solid Phase
LJ Bioventing
LJ Other (specify)
one only. Fill out a separate form for each additional technology.
LJ Chemical Treatment -
Dechlorination
LJ Chemical Treatment - In Situ
Ground Water
LJ Chemical Treatment - Other
LJ Chemical Treatment -
Oxidation/Reduction
LJ Delivery/Extraction Systems
LJ Dual-Phase Extraction
LJ Electrical Separation
LJ Electro-Thermal Gasification -
In Situ
LJ Fracturing - Pneumatic
LJ Fracturing - Hydraulic
LJ Magnetic Separation
LJ Materials Handling/ Physical
Separation
LJ Off-Gas Treatment
LJ Plasma
LJ Pyrolysis
Slagging - Off-Gas Treated
Soil Flushing - In Situ
Soil Vapor Extraction
LJ Soil Washing
LJ Solidification/Stabilization
LJ Solvent Extraction
LJ Surfactant Enhanced
Recovery - In Situ
LJ Thermal Desorption
Thermally Enhanced Recovery
- In Situ
Transportable Thermal
Destruction
Vitrification
Trade Name and/or Model
Number Assigned By Vendor
Is this a registered Trademark? Q
Does the vendor hold an exclusive license? Qj
(if different than Technology Type).
Yes Q No
Yes Q No
-------
2.6
2.7
Vendor Name
Technology Type
PART 2: TECHNOLOGY OVERVIEW (continued)
Patents
a. Is technology patented? G Yes
b. Is patent pending? G Yes
Q No
G No
Technology Scale. Check only one. Using the following definitions, indicate the operational
status of the technology.
a. G Full scale. Available equipment is sized and commercially available for actual site
remediation. (If you select full scale, you must fill out Part 3).
b. G Pilot scale. Available equipment is of sufficient size to verify technology feasibility
or establish the design and operating conditions for a full-scale system. However,
it is not of the size typically used for a cleanup. (If you select pilot scale, you must
fill out Part 4).
c. G Bench scale or emerging. Technology has been shown to be feasible through the
use of bench-top equipment in the laboratory. Data from these studies cannot be
used to scale up the technology to full scale. (If you select bench scale, you must
fill out Part 5).
2.8a. Is this technology in the Superfund Innovative Technology Evaluation (SITE) Program.
Q Yes Q No
fa. Is this technology being tested, or has this technology been tested, in EPA SITE Emerging
Technology Program?
Q Yes
Q No
EPA Project Manager:
SITE Document Number(s):
c. Is this technology being tested, or has this technology been tested, in EPA SITE
Demonstration Program?
Q Yes
EPA Project Manager:
SITE Document Number(s):
Q No
-------
Vendor Name
Technology Type
PART 2: TECHNOLOGY OVERVIEW (continued)
2.9 Description of Technology. In 300 words or less, describe the treatment process, including
scientific principles on which the technology is based; key treatment steps; unique and
innovative features; whether full-scale system is/will be batch, continuous, or semicorttinuous;
and whether the technology is above ground or in situ. Parts 3 and 4 allow more detail for
full- and pilot-scale systems. Provide a flow chart or schematic of the treatment process,
showing the equipment necessary for each step. To ensure the schematics are legible in the
final system, EPA recommends that schematics be submitted in an Encapsulated Postscript
(EPS) Bitmap (BWIP), Tag Image File (TIP) or Zsoft PC Paintbrush Bitmap (PCX) electronic
format. If an electronic copy is not available, a Camera-ready hard copy suitable for computer
scanning can be submitted as an alternative.
EXAMPLE ' -
:' '- • » - ^ : " ~-
* •>,->; Deseriptloit of Technology * -^ -
'*•*,:•.,.' » >c •„ •','-' ..- -..«.-,,, -
ABC Corporation has developed an innovative solvent extraction technology (SUPERj that uses Super" Chemicalas -
the solvent. Super Chemical is a biodegradable solvent. " ,'c
The key to success of this process, is Super ^Chemical's property of inverse rniseibility; below && degrees, F,,Super
Chemical & soluble ir> water {nydrophificfand above 6§*degrees & it is insoluble in water {hydrophobia}* Therefore",
»cold Super Chemical can-extract water and water-soluble compounds, and warm Super Chemical can extract organic
contaminants, sucrVas PCBs, pesticides, 'PAHs, Sv"QCs, and VOCs,
- " l " " ' " S°' " ° - ' \ , 1"
Witfiin the unit, xthe soli Is washed efontmuousfy^with,Super Chemical m a counter-current process, 'the contaminants
dissolve fn^Ehe solution and are^removed from toe soil by the courtesy-current fldw. The contaminated solvents are'
.Veclatmed in a closed-loop circuit, «Hminatingvthe need for large volumes of solvent. Th*e clean, washed soilfs moved
to a closed-loop dryer system, where any excess'solvent is removed from the soil.- When the soil exits the systepj,
it is'relativety*free of organfcs and dry^ "The collected contaminant from the solvent washing 5s coneefttrated 1,000-
to 1O,000 times-, reducing its volume and its associated disposal coste, and is pumped periodically from the s,ystem
into, labeled 55-gaIlon drums for conventional off-site dlsposah
i > s' ', "", i " ' r ^ ^
Emissions of organic Vapors to air are controlled and treated by a' carbon absorption system. ^
-------
2.9
Vendor Name
Technology Type
PART 2: TECHNOLOGY OVERVIEW (continued)
Description of Technology (continued).
-------
Vendor Name
Technology Type
PART 2: TECHNOLOGY OVERVIEW (continued)
2.10 Technology Highlights. In 200 words or less, describe the key marketable features of the
technology in terms of contaminants treated, performance, implementation, or cost. Include
highlights such as treatment niche and advantages over other technologies.
The SUPER solvent extraction process cart treat soils, sludges/and'sediments contaminated^ wttrT PCBs,-
'carcinogenic PAHs, pesticides; and, VQCs at 2ft percept'to 40 peftent of incineration cosls1. TreateCprddMcts"
frorh/£he SUPEft process ?ne}u,,, '*
iThe SUPER sofvem extraction process operates at near ambient pressures'alid temperatures, uses off-the-shelf
process equipment, and controls air emissions. The. extraction efficiency (organic removal efffeieBcyyaehieved
"is as high as 99 percent, . . ^ ^
Solvent recovery is also greater 1han.°99 percerrt. The process can treat up to 30Ootons per day of contaminated
soil. This technology is Weil accepted by communities because air e>nissjons are tninirrsfzecb
-------
Vendor Name
Technology Type
PART 2: TECHNOLOGY OVERVIEW (continued)
2.11 Technical Limitations. In 200 words or less, describe the technical limitations such as specific
contaminants or contaminant combinations, temperature, moisture content, or chemical
properties of the contaminant, that could adversely affect applicability or performance.
EXAMPLE , ,
' >
Technology Limitations
The SUPER process is not applicable for metat-oniy, radioactive, high-concentration or other in'organic wastes; but
its performance is not affected by non radioactive inorganics at tow concentrations. This process may'require
screening or crushing to 0.25 inch, and other feed preparation operations, depending on tt^e waste. The extraction <
efficiency of an organic contaminant will depend on its solubility in the solvent. The solvent used is best suited
for PCBs and pesticides.
-------
Vendor Name
Technology Type
PART 2: TECHNOLOGY OVERVIEW (continued)
2.12 Other Comments. In 200 words or less, provide additional information about the technology,
such as its history, status, capabilities, and experience and applicable permits obtained (for
example, TSCA or RCRA). Also describe plans for future development of the technology,
including diversification of media and/or contaminants treated.
~ " /• '' * Other Comments, * •• , . ' - :
•>,•** r./ 'r "•-*;•. :'. -.^ - V *"'-'* '*- " " - -' " • "i
The, SUPER -process has tieirt (lemonstrated^ucfeessf ujly s$ %eoely scale, |>ti£t scale, and full scale/ A full-scale • ;
^SUPElf^unit was^ used tti treat vstadjges contamjriated Wr|h PCBs at the BApJofl Raining Sup^rfirrjd sfte. ' I
^o"*1* %* % ^. * ^*-*- ^^ ,^ k , j
•* 4. •> < * *?. •> 4.* *• *- * i
Tvtfo pHot'Soale units Isave-bee^' fauilt.^ One.jVas operated yn6er the SITf program to tf^at soife^fttf sludges I
" ' ' '
, . ^
Benoh-scile treat01ffty studies have beenvcorjdt»ct0d oft 'contaminated soils containing petrochemical .compounds, :
.prsarmaeeutical cornpouptis, pesticide^, fCl^, and* wood preserving wastes-contatnttig PAHs,' _ -
-------
2.13
Vendor Name
Technology Type
PART 2: TECHNOLOGY OVERVIEW (continued)
Media treated. Check "actual" for all media that have been treated by your technology. Check
"potential" for all media to which the technology may be applied in the future.
Actual Potential
Q Ql Soil (in situ)
Q Q Soil (ex situ)
L) CJ Sludge (does not include municipal sewage sludge)
Ql Q Solid (for example, slag)
LJ LJ Saturated sediment (in situ)
LJ LJ Saturated sediment (ex situ)
Q Q Ground water (in situ) [Includes treatment of ground water and/or saturated
soil]
LJ LJ Off-gas generated from a primary innovative treatment technology
LJ LJ Dense nonaqueous phase liquids (DNAPL) [in situ]
LJ Q Light nonaqueous phase liquids (LNAPL) [in situ]
Q Q Other:
10
-------
Vendor Name
Technology Type
PART 2: TECHNOLOGY OVERVIEW (continued)
2.14 Contaminant Groups Treated. Check all that may apply. Check "actual" for all that have
been treated by your technology (that is, data exist). Check "potential" for all that the
technology may be applied to in the future. Data for actual contaminants treated should be
included in Part 6 (see Appendix B for key to contaminant groups). If your technology is
materials handling/physical separation, delivery/extraction, or if you are an equipment
vendor, this question may not apply.
Actual Potential
Actual Potential
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
Halogenated volatiles
Halogenated semivolatiles
Nonhalogenated volatiles
Nonhalogenated semivolatiles
Organic pesticides/herbicides
Dioxins/furans
PCBs
Polynuclear aromatic
hydrocarbons (PAHs)
Solvents
Benzene-toluene-ethylbenzene-
xylene;(BTEX)
Acetonitrile (organic cyanide)
Organic acids
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
Heavy metals
Nonmetallic toxic elements
Radioactive metals
Asbestos
Inorganic cyanides
Inorganic corrosives
Miscellaneous
LJ
LJ
Explosives/propellants
Medical wastes
Organometallic pesticides/herbicides
a a
Other (specify)
11
-------
Vendor Name
Technology Type
PART 2: TECHNOLOGY OVERVIEW (continued)
2.15 Industrial Waste Sources or Site Types. Check all that apply. Check "actual" for all that
have been treated by your technology (that is, data exist). Check "potential" for all that
the technology may be applied to in the future. Treatment data should be available for
those sites for which "actual" is checked. See Table 2.1 for wastes typically associated
with each industry.
Actual Potential
LJ
LJ
LJ
LJ
LJ
LJ
LJ
LJ
Q
LJ
LJ
LJ
LJ
LJ Agriculture
LJ Battery recycling/disposal
LJ Chlor-alkali manufacturing
LJ Coal gasification
LJ Dry cleaning
LJ
LJ
Electroplating
Gasoline service
station/petroleum storage facility
Herbicide manufacturing/use
Q Industrial landfills
LJ Inorganic/organic pigments
LJ Machine shops
LJ Medical wastes
LJ Metal ore mining and smelting
LJ
Actual Potential
LJ LJ Municipal landfill
LJ LJ Munitions manufacturing
LJ LJ Paint/ink formulation
LJ LJ Pesticide manufacturing/use
LJ LJ Petroleum refining/reuse
LJ LJ Photographic products
LJ LJ Plastics manufacturing
LJ LJ Pulp and paper industry
LJ LJ Other organic chemical manufacturing
LJ LJ Other inorganic chemical manufacturing
LJ LJ Semiconductor manufacturing
LJ LJ Rubber manufacturing
LJ LJ Wood preserving
LJ LJ Uranium mining
LJ LJ Other (specify)
12
-------
Vendor Name
Technology Type
PART 2: TECHNOLOGY OVERVIEW (continued)
Table 2.1
Contaminants/Wastes Associated With Industrial Waste Sources or Types of Sites
Agriculture
Battery recycling/disposal
Chlor-alkali manufacturing
Coal gasification
Dry cleaning
Electroplating
Herbicide manufacturing/use
Industrial landfills
Inorganic/organic pigments
Machine shops
Medical wastes
Metal ore mining and smelting
Municipal landfills
Munitions manufacturing
Paint/ink formulation
Pesticide manufacturing/use
Petroleum refining/reuse
Photographic products
Plastics manufacturing
Pulp and paper industry
Other organic chemical manufacturing
Other inorganic chemical manufacturing
Semiconductor manufacturing
Rubber manufacturing
Wood preserving
Uranium mining
Pesticides
Lead (acid)
Chlorine compounds, mercury
PAHs
Solvents
Chrome, metals
Pesticides
Wastes from multiple sources
Solvents, chrome, zinc
Metals, oils
Metals, radioactive wastes
Metals
Wastes from multiple sources
Explosives, lead
Solvents, some metals (chrome, zinc)
Pesticides
Petroleum, hydrocarbons, BTEX
Silver, bromide, solvent
Polymers, phthalates
Chlorinated organics, dioxins
Organics, metals (used as catalyst)
Inorganics, metals
Degreasing agents (solvents), metals
Rubber, plastics, polymers, organics
Creosote, PCP, arsenic, chrome, PAHs
Uranium, radioactive metals
13
-------
Vendor Name
Technology Type
PART 3: FULL SCALE EQUIPMENT/CAPABILITIES
You must complete this part if you checked Response 2.7a (that is, technology is at full scale).
You may also complete this part if the technology is at pilot scale.
3.1 Major Unit Processes. In 300 words or less, describe the steps and operation of the full-
scale system, including a list of key components. Also describe any pre- and post-
processing required by your technology. Provide more detail than you did in Question 2.9.
EXAMPLE
Major Unit Processes
Preprocessing
1. Front-end loader and weight scale -
2. Shredder
3. Radial stacker belt conveyor and surge hopper
a. Stockpiled soil is transported to a weigh scale by a front-end loader.
b. Soil is deposited directly on a power shredding device. Classified soil with a top size of less-
than 2 inches passes through the shredder into the feed conveyor.
c. The feed conveyor is an enclosed radial stacker pelt conveyor that is 18 inches -wide and 60
feet long. The conveyor discharges into the surge hopper iocated.above the thermal processor.
The soil is fed into the LT system at regular intervals to maintain the surge hopper seal.
Processing ' ''',,,
1. Thermal processor
2. Induced draft (ID) fan for vapors , ' ~
3. Horizontal screw conveyor and ash conditioner • - ' .
a. The thermal processor houses four intermeshed screw conveyors, The'function of each screw
conveyor is to move soil forward through the processor and to thoroughly mix the, material,
providing indirect contact between the heat transfer fluid and,the soil. The shafts and flights
of the screw conveyors and the processor jackets are hollow to allow circulation of a heat
transfer fluid (that is, hot oil).
b. Vapors are driven off the soil and are drawn out of the thermal processor by an ID fan. '
c. Soil is discharged from the thermal processor onto a horizontal screw conveyor and then art ash
conditioner. ', ,
f , ^
d. The conditioner is a ribbon flight screw conveyor. Water spray nozzles installed- in 'the'.
conditioner housing coo! the discharge material and,rninimize fugitive dust-emissions. •<
Postprocessing • "
* c
1. Stacker belt conveyor and dump truck
a. The conditioner discharges onto an inclined stacker belt. The stacker belt conveys the wetted'
processed soil from the conditioner to the dump truck, s , " >
14
-------
Vendor Name
Technology Type
PART 3: FULL SCALE EQUIPMENT/CAPABILITIES
3.1 Major Unit Processes (continued).
15
-------
Vendor Name
Technology Type
PART 3: FULL SCALE EQUIPMENT/CAPABILITIES
3,2a. Full-Scale Facility is (check one only)
LJ Transportable LJ Fixed LJ In situ
b. City and State of fixed facility
3.3
3.5
3.6
Number of Full-Scale Systems.
Planned/in design
Projected completion
dates (mm/yyyy)
Under construction
Projected completion
dates (mm/yyyy)
Constructed
3.4 Capacity Range.
to
(units) LJ Not applicable
Estimated Price Range. Provide a "ballpark" estimate per unit of waste treated. Include
waste preprocessing and exclude excavation, permitting, and disposal of residues.
to $
per
(units)
Factors Affecting Unit Price. With "1" the highest, rank any of the following items that will
have a significant effect on the unit price. If the technology is in situ, excavation and
waste handling cannot affect price.
Initial concentration of contaminant
Target concentration of contaminant
Quantity of waste
Depth of contamination
Depth to ground water
Characteristics of residual waste
Moisture content of soil
Site preparation
Waste handling/preprocessing
Amount of debris with waste
Characteristics of soil (classification,
permeability)
Utility/fuel rates
Labor rates
Other (specify)
3.7 Full-Scale Cleanups.
a. If you are a subcontractor or prime contractor, give the number of full-scale cleanups
using your technology that your firm has initiated or completed. Consider only those
applications of your technology that were applied at petroleum/hazardous waste sites.
b. If you are an equipment manufacturer, give the number of full-scale cleanups by other
firms using your technology of which you are aware. Consider only those applications
of your technology that were applied at petroleum/hazardous waste sites.
16
-------
Vendor Name
Technology Type
PART 4: PILOT-SCALE EQUIPMENT/CAPABILITIES
You must complete this part if you checked Response Question 2.7b. You also may complete this part
if the technology is at full scale or bench scale.
4.1 Major Unit Processes. In 200 words or less, describe the steps and operation of the pilot-scale
treatment system, including a list of the key components. Also describe any pre- and post-
processing required by your technology. Provide more detail than you did in Question 2.9.
; - . ' EXAMPLE V , J > .
" o , '"',,"' ,""-,, ' * " • ' ' - " '
',,'-,'<, , Major Unit Processes °, , " - f . , I
' *'<<'„ *> ° '
Pilot-scale testing involves processing the soils or bullc soils through various operations of reducetd-ske equipment
setlq serjes, woufd be similar to a fuli-scafe.pperation, The equipment consists -of; . „ -.<• - 5 J
1 . A'tioppe/and screen for feed preparation; removal of 'tramp material and^sizingi if needed.
2. A mixing oV attrition tank where the prepared feed is introdu&ed to the liquids. In the^most basic sys'tem, -.
extraction of contaminant takes place at> this sta'ge, r ,/ , > °' •,
'3. A classification circu'rt, consisting of a, sump, pump, 'and cycfone for separation of coarse sand, gravel, |nd
organics from fine clays and silts; ' , ' „ ° \ " " ° "
,'-4, If e&r.ac'tion of contarrtinarit so reqaires, coarse material is subjected to a specific gravity (,SG) separation through
use .of a ves'sel, cyclone, or hydrosizer. Contaminated smaller size material "(low ;SG) is°-separated frdrn the qjean,
coarse (high SQ) materi'if, " , , •
^ •, '• f \-<« • ' , ' -" • ' " * I
5. Clean^ coarse material fs dewatered with a screen, although in full-scale 'operation I additional dryers, (centrifuges^
. may be^ernployed. ,' "' , " '^ ,' "/."•'•', -, ^ '
*^ '°° ^ ', ' ^-^P j ' , ' V ^'
f'0>" J ' J h 5t^a;x I
•6. Low, SS organics, containing c'ontaminant are dewatered with a screen and collected for disposafor secondary i
• treatment. \ . . , I , „ ' I
,7, Clays and silts are flocculated in a reaction tank and gravity-concentrated in Thickened clays and silts containing contaminant are dewatered in a belt press and sent for 'djsposal or secondary' 1
p'rocsessing, '* ( ' •" ' ' ' i
9, Recycled liquid from the thickening and dewaterfng process is collected and, in some cases,, jtreated, before it is I
> returned to the mixing/attrition tank. " " > ," , ' |
17
-------
Vendor Name
Technology Type
PART 4: PILOT-SCALE EQUIPMENT/CAPABILITIES
4.1 Major Unit Processes (continued).
4.2 a. Pilot-Scale Facility is (Check only one)
L_l Transportable LJ Fixed
b. City and State
4.3 Number of Pilot-Scale Systems
Planned/in design
Projected completion
date (mm/yyyy)
Under construction
Projected completion
date (mm/yyyy)
Ql In Situ
of fixed facility.
Constructed
4.4
How many times have you used this technology at your facility or at other locations to
conduct pilot-scale studies on actual wastes? Count only once multiple studies pertaining to
the same site, regardless of the number of different wastes or tests. Do not count tests on
surrogate wastes.
4.5
4.6
a. Can you conduct pilot-scale treatability studies on some types of waste at your location?
Q Yes Ul No
b. At a contaminated site?
Q Yes Q No
Capacity Range. Prorate capacity of batch processes. This range should be consistent
with your answer to Question 4.7 (the waste requirement for the pilot-scale treatability
study).
to
(units)
Not applicable
4.7
Quantity of Waste Needed for Pilot-Scale Treatability Study. Give the estimated range of
quantity of waste needed to test, at the pilot scale, the feasibility of this technology on a
specific waste.
to (units)
18
-------
Vendor Name
Technology Type
PART 5: BENCH-SCALE OR EMERGING EQUIPMENT/CAPABILITIES
You must complete this part if you checked Response Question 2.7c. You also may complete this
part if the technology is at full scale or pilot scale.
5.1 Can you conduct bench-scale treatability studies on some types of waste at your location?
Q Yes Q No
5.2 Number of Bench-Scale Studies Conducted. Estimate total number of bench-scale studies
conducted on actual waste from different sources or sites. Count only once multiple
studies pertaining to the same site, regardless of the number of different wastes or tests.
Do not count tests on surrogate wastes.
5.3 Description of Bench-Scale Testing Procedures. In 200 words or less, describe the type of
test that would be performed to determine feasibility of this technology for treating a
specific waste.
EXAMPLE " ~ ..
Description of Bench-Scale Testing Procedures \ "
In our feasibility assessment tests, we-usually start with a sample of the soil to be treated and a - , ,
1. The°optimal conditions for soit washing are studied, such as pH, time, and ctielating agent and concentration,
2.', Various likely adsorbents are studied on a batch ba'sis to determine which are most effective at removing the
' metals of interest frqnrthe chelating agent in the washing water.
3, One or more selected rrfedia then are studied on columns to determine .their ability to/retain m'etals jn'a
continuous-flow situation. f _ , "'
" 4, For the' surviving adsorbentjs), the" ion elution performance then is determined; after this step,- one.resin' will have
been selected as optimal 'for the particular task under study.
5. The selected adsorbent then is subjected to a number of charge and regeneration cycles to establish its
1 ruggedness.
19
-------
THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
-------
Vendor Name
Technology Type
PART 5: REPRESENTATIVE APPLICATIONS, CLIENT REFERENCES, AND PERFORMANCE DATA
6.1 List as many as five representative projects that also can serve as references. List
information for only one project per sheet. For projects that have more than one
application, fill out a separate sheet for each application. Provide only the performance
data that is specific to each project listed. Full- and pilot-scale projects are of most
importance. EPA reserves the right to add information on projects conducted for the
federal government of which EPA is aware.
'^i^^^^&^^iit^^^^
*'Xj3f>; '-•— .---K^ s^^^v^W^i^V&r-''^ ^>-*,&i&Xi& * i^'-^i^^V
Agriculture
Battery recycling/disposal
Chlor-alkali manufacturing
Coal gasification
Dry cleaning
Electroplating
Gasoline service
station/petroleum storage
facility
Herbicide
manufacturing/use
Location
City
State/Province:
Country
RCRA corrective action
CERCLA
TSCA
Safe Drinking Water Act
UST corrective action
State (specify)
DoD
DOE
Other {Specify)
Not Applicable
Volume/Quantity Treated
(Units)
Area treated (for in situ projects)
(Units)
Depth treated (for in situ projects)
(Units)
Machine shops
Medical wastes
Metal ore mining and smelting
Municipal landfill
Munitions manufacturing
Paint/ink formulation
Pesticide manufacturinq/use
Petroleum refining/reuse
Photographic products
Plastics manufacturing
Pulp and paper industry
Project took place at site named?
Yes
No
s^^t^^'-^t^fii^ftW^S^i^
S^^^^lffSI^^^M;^^?
Full-scale cleanup
Field demonstration
Pilot-scale treatabilitv study
Bench-scale treatabilitv study
RCRA Research, Development,
and Demonstration
TSCA National Demonstration
TSCA Research and Development
EPA SITE Demonstration Program
!li^RjS'i^5&B^?i^^^i^siS&i?>]i&*slw*o"
Soil (in situ)
Soil (ex situ)
Sludge
Solid (for example, slag)
Saturated sediment (in situ)
Saturated sediment (ex situ)
Bench
Pilot
Full
1!*'; «$: ?*?C-f «'K\-^:V^-.:'>*<,*&£• * ft v^sf. Afx-^s-T
Other inorganic chemical
manufacturing
Semiconductor manufacturing
Rubber manufacturing
Wood preserving
Uranium mining
Other (specify)
At another site (that is, a Test facility)?
Yes
No
^^^^si^^itii^^^^
"^^^^^^^K^^K^^^y^A^^^
EPA SITE Emerqinq Technology
Program
Research
Other (specify)
M$^m$ay/^A^^^^f^^&,
^A>*> 'Ww\£ /^ > v^A^>%>V^\4» ^<\ ^-^ '^ t X'X^K^* c
Off-gas from a primary
treatment technology
Dense nonaqueous phase
liquids (DNAPL) [in situ]
Light nonaqueous phase liquids
(LNAPL) [in situ]
Other:
Contracted
Month(mm) Year (yyyy)
Ongoing Yes No
Completed
Month(mm) Year (yyyy)
21
-------
Vendor Name
Technology Type
PART 6: REPRESENTATIVE APPLICATIONS, CLIENT REFERENCES, AND PERFORMANCE DATA
Note: (1) List one specific contaminant per line. Do not list such entire contaminant groups as VOCs or solvents.
TPH, which can be analyzed using a specific test method, can be listed as an individual contaminant.
(2) and (3) Indicate the appropriate units; for concentrations that were non-detect write N.D.; treated
concentration should be lower than untreated concentration unless the technology is dewatering or
some other volume reduction method. If a concentration range cannot be given, provide an average
and note it as such.
(4) Specify the cleanup standard or goal, if known, for the individual contaminant for this project. For
example, if the project was part of a Superfund remedial action, the cleanup goal is specified in the
record of decision (ROD) for that site.
Performance Data , , ?_ " - Y ^ -„'/>, ->''*,' '-->
(1)
Contaminant or Pollutant
Parameter
'{Extanptel Benzene
(2)
Untreated
Concentration Range
(Min to Max)
50 - 15O
{3}
Units
mg/kg
(2)
Treated
Concentration Range
flVHntb.Max)
25 • SO/
' m
Units
; mg/$ff
^' ' M4>V
, Cleanup Standard
• . , , ^ Ojf 0oat * , .
'-: .-" *' 8Q v ' ",',
\>K
' \ Onjts • " '
- mg/ft- ;'
Conditions or Interference adversely affecting performance
Cost Information _ „ „ ' ' „'• '.".,'
Estimated or actual total and/or unit cost for this
project
$ per (unit)
$ (total)
What items or activities are included or not included in these cost(s) (for example,
mobilization, demobilization, excavation, waste handling)?
Person outside of company familiar with project (optional)
Nomo Company
Address
Phono
Is Literature Available on this Project? (You
may wish to include these citations in Part 6}
Yes No
Additional project information such as site conditions, mode of operation, and other pertinent information.
22
-------
Vendor Name
Technology Type
PART 6: REPRESENTATIVE APPLICATIONS, CLIENT REFERENCES, AND PERFORMANCE DATA
6.2
Agriculture Machine shops
Battery recycling/disposal Medical wastes
Chlor-alkali manufacturing Metal ore mining and smelting
Coal gasification Municipal landfill
Dry cleaning Munitions manufacturing
Electroplating Paint/ink formulation
Gasoline service Pesticide manufacturing/use
station/petroleum storage
facility
Herbicide manufacturing/use
Petroleum refining/reuse
Photographic products
Plastics manufacturinq
industrial lanamis Pulp and paper industrv
inorganic/organic pigments Otner organic chemica]
manufacturing
Location
City
State/Province:
Country
Regulation/Statute/Organization , „
,' ICJteck all that apptyK
RCRA corrective action
CERCLA
TSCA
Safe Drinking Water Act
UST corrective action
State (specify)
DoD
DOE
Other (Specify)
Not Applicable
Volume/Quantity Treated
(Units)
Area treated (for in situ projects)
(Units)
Depth treated (for in situ projects)
(Units)
Project took place at site named?
Yes
No
Other inorganic chemical
manufacturing
Semiconductor manufacturing
Rubber manufacturing
Wood preserving
Uranium mining
Other (specify)
At another site (that is, a Test facility)?
Yes
No
Application of PfCfpit>t'ryf>& (Check pll that apfffyj , * „ * i* •
<- s ***.'-' " ' " > "- ' » * * - * tv, i
Full-scale cleanup
Field demonstration
Pilot-scale treatability study
Bench-scale treatability study
RCRA Research, Development,
and Demonstration
TSCA National Demonstration
TSCA Research and Development
EPA SITE Demonstration Program
Soil (in situ)
Soil (ex situ)
Sludge
Solid (for example, slag)
Saturated sediment (in situ)
Saturated sediment (ex situ)
Ground water (in situ)
'V<^\ ,V "i^> ,^ ,4c?' *•' >*£-^j*< >; V'- *-?V<& 'v, A ^ o, -,. ^^3* *\; \^. ^& ?,^f
li^4^^^^^^M^Mf^M^r-'
Bench
Pilot
Full
EPA SITE Emerging Technology
Program
Research
Other (specify)
'^^^^^t^ 'S S !/!?> JrS'S5,
s^ •/• v v i- <; '.t^v^J o-X> A rf^^)s, w--&'^ "'^-^ c 4?'" J'
Off-gas from a primary
treatment technology
Dense nonaqueous phase
liquids (DNAPL) [in situ]
Light nonaqueous phase liquids
(LNAPL) [in situ]
Other:
liitlill?^i^ffi;S;^liil
Contracted
Month(mm) Year (yyyy)
Ongoing Yes No
Completed
Month(mm) Year (yyyy)
23
-------
Vendor Name
Technology Type
PART B: REPRESENTATIVE APPLICATIONS, CLIENT REFERENCES, AND PERFORMANCE DATA
Note: (1) List one specific contaminant per line. Do not list such entire contaminant groups as VOCs or solvents.
TPH, which can be analyzed using a specific test method, can be listed as an individual contaminant.
(2) and (3) Indicate the appropriate units; for concentrations that were non-detect write N.D.; treated
concentration should be lower than untreated concentration unless the technology is dewatering or
some other volume reduction method. If a concentration range cannot be given, provide an average
and note it as such.
(4) Specify the cleanup standard or goal, if known, for the individual contaminant for this project. For
example, if the project was part of a Superfund remedial action, the cleanup goal is specified in the
record of decision (ROD) for that site.
Performance Data s> ^ r '°, , ''/ '., "", •
(1)
Contaminant or Pollutant
Paramotor
(ExampM Benzene
(2)
Untreated
Concentration
Range
(Min to Max)
SO -150
m
Units
mg/kg
(2J>
Treated <• >'
Concentration Range
(Min to Max)
25- 60 , ,
(3)
, Units
mg/kg
1 > \ (4) '
Cleanup Standard'
or <3oa^
- V.so, ; -
'' {3} '
" Untt«" ,
•>' mt0tff
Conditions or interference adversely affecting performance
Cost information - ^ '""'', ' *
Estimated or actual total and/or unit cost for this
project
$ per (unit)
$ (total)
What items or activities are included or not included in these cost(s) (for example,
mobilization, demobilization, excavation, waste handling)?
Person outside of company familiar with project (optional)
Nama Company
Address
Phone
Is Literature Available on this Project? (You may
wish to include these citations in Part 6)
Yes No
Additional project information such as site conditions, mode of operation, and other pertinent info
rmation.
24
-------
Vendor Name
Technology Type
PART 5: REPRESENTATIVE APPLICATIONS, CLIENT REFERENCES, AND PERFORMANCE DATA
6.3
Agriculture
Battery recycling/disposal
Chlor-alkali manufacturing
Coal gasification
Dry cleaning
Electroplating
Gasoline service
station/petroleum storage
facility
Herbicide manufacturing/use
Industrial landfills
Inorganic/organic pigments
Machine shops
Medical wastes
Metal ore mining and smelting
Municipal landfill
Munitions manufacturing
Paint/ink formulation
Pesticide manufacturing/use
Petroleum refining/reuse
Photographic products
Plastics manufacturing
Pulp and paper industry
Other organic chemical
manufacturing
Other inorganic chemical
manufacturing
Semiconductor manufacturing
Rubber manufacturing
Wood preserving
Uranium mining
Other (specify)
Location
City
State/Province:
Country
RCRA corrective action
CERCLA
TSCA
Safe Drinking Water Act
LIST corrective action
State (specify)
DoD
DOE
Other (Specify)
Not Applicable
Project took place at site named?
Yes
No
At another site (that is, a Test facility)?
Yes
No •
Full-scale cleanup
Field demonstration
Pilot-scale treatability study
Bench-scale treatability study
RCRA Research, Development,
and Demonstration
TSCA National Demonstration
TSCA Research and Development
EPA SITE Demonstration Program
EPA SITE Emerging Technology
Program
Research
Other (specify)
Soil (in situ)
Soil (ex situ)
Sludge
Solid (for example, slag)
Saturated sediment (in situ)
Saturated sediment (ex situ)
Ground water (in situ)
Off-gas from a primary
treatment technology
Dense nonaqueous phase
liquids (DNAPL) [in situ]
Light nonaqueous phase liquids
(LNAPL) [in situ]
Other:
Volume/Quantity Treated
(Units)
Area treated (for in situ projects)
(Units)
Bench
Pilot
Full
Depth treated (for in situ projects)
(Units)
Contracted
Month(mm) Year (yyyy)
Ongoing Yes
Completed
Month(mm) Year (yyyy)
No
25
-------
Vendor Name
Technology Type
PART B: REPRESENTATIVE APPLICATIONS, CLIENT REFERENCES, AND PERFORMANCE DATA
Note: (1)
(2) and (3)
(4)
List one specific contaminant per line. Do not list such entire contaminant groups as VOCs or
solvents. TPH, which can be analyzed using a specific test method, can be listed as an individual
contaminant.
Indicate the appropriate units; for concentrations that were non-detect write N.D.; treated
concentration should be lower than untreated concentration unless the technology is dewatering or
some other volume reduction method. If a concentration range cannot be given, provide an average
and note it as such.
Specify the cleanup standard or goal, if known, for the individual contaminant for this project. For
example, if the project was part of a Superfund remedial action, the cleanup goal is specified in the
record of decision (ROD) for that site.
* . J Performance Data - , v > ,,
; ]• (1)
Conuimiruint or Pollutant
Parameter
(Extmpla) Benzene
(2)
Untreated
Concentration Range
(Min to Max)
50 - ISO
(31
Units
rng/kg
(2> ^
Treated
Concentration Range
{Min to Max) .
25 -SO
C3> .
Units
mg/kg
." **>
Cleanup Standard' •
or Goal
50 ,
'(3)
Urijits ;
mg/l® ,
Conditions or Interference adversely affecting performance
Cost Information ' / ' ' •'•,', °' •'
Estimated or actual total and/or unit cost for this
project
$ per (unit)
$ (total)
What items or activities are included or not included in these cost(s) (for example,
mobilization, demobilization, excavation, waste handling)?
Person outside of company familiar with project (optional)
Nnmo Company
Address
Phona
Is Literature Available on this Project? (You
may wish to include these citations in Part 6)
Yes No
Additional project informal on such as site conditions, mode of operation, and other pertinent info
rmation.
26
-------
Vendor Name
Technology Type
PART 6: REPRESENTATIVE APPLICATIONS, CLIENT REFERENCES, AND PERFORMANCE DATA
6.4
Agriculture
Battery recycling/disposal
Chlor-alkali manufacturing
Coal gasification
Dry cleaning
Electroplating
Gasoline service
station/petroleum storage facility
Herbicide manufacturing/use
Industrial landfills
Inorganic/organic pigments
Machine shops
Medical wastes
Metal ore mining and smelting
Municipal landfill
Munitions manufacturing
Paint/ink formulation
Pesticide manufacturing/use
Petroleum refining /reuse
Photographic products
Plastics manufacturing
Pulp and paper industry
Other organic chemical
manufacturing
Other inorganic chemical
manufacturing
Semiconductor manufacturing
Rubber manufacturing
Wood preserving
Uranium mining
Other (specify)
Location
City
State/Province:
Country
EPA SITE Emerging Technology
RCRA corrective action
CERCLA
TSCA
Safe Drinking Water Act
UST corrective action
State (specify)
DoD
DOE
Other (Specify)
Not Applicable
Project took place at site named?
Yes
No
At another site (that is, a Test facility)?
______ Yes
No
Full-scale cleanup
Field demonstration
Pilot-scale treatability study
Bench-scale treatability study
RCRA Research, Development,
and Demonstration
TSCA National Demonstration
TSCA Research and
Development
EPA SITE Demonstration
. Program
Soil (in situ)
Soil (ex situ)
Sludge
Solid (for example, slag)
Saturated sediment (in situ)
Saturated sediment (ex situ)
Ground water (in situ)
Off-gas from a primary
treatment technology
Dense nonaqueous phase
liquids (DNAPL) tin situ]
Light nonaqueous phase liquids
(LNAPL) [in situ]
Other:
Volume/Quantity Treated
(Units)
Area treated (for in situ projects)
(Units)
Bench
Pilot
Full
Depth treated (for in situ projects)
(Units)
Contracted
Month(mm) Year (yyyy)
Ongoing Yes
Completed
No
Month(mm)
Year (vvvv)
27
-------
Vendor Name
Technology Type
PART B: REPRESENTATIVE APPLICATIONS, CLIENT REFERENCES,-AND PERFORMANCE DATA
Note: (1) List one specific contaminant per line. Do not list such entire contaminant groups as VOCs or solvents.
TPH, which can be analyzed using a specific test method, can be listed as an individual contaminant.
(2) and (3) Indicate the appropriate units; for concentrations that were non-detect write N.D.; treated
concentration should be lower than untreated concentration unless the technology is dewatering or
some other volume reduction method. If a concentration range cannot be given, provide an average
and note it as such.
(4) Specify the cleanup standard or goal, if known, for the individual contaminant for this project. For
example, if the project was part of a Superfund remedial action, the cleanup goal is specified in the
record of decision (ROD) for that site.
;' '": ' " " "'' Performance Bata , .' > ' ~ ^ > ',' , ' ~ <' ^ -
' m
Contaminant or Pollutant
Parameter
(Extrnpht Benzene
(2)
Untreated
Concentration Range
(Win to Max}
50 - 150
Conditions or Interference adversely affecting perfor
{3}
Unrts
mg/kg
<2>
Treated
Concentration Range
(Min to Max)
2&-&0
13}
Units
ntg/kff
' (4J
Cleanup Standard
or Goal.1
«f' . ; '-
„„ &i '
* Ufltts
, ff*$*g ,,>
mance
Cost Information ' . '"'''.
Estimated or actual total and/or unit cost for this
project
$ per (unit)
$ (total)
What items or activities are included or not included in these cost(s) (for example,
mobilization, demobilization, excavation, waste handling)?
Parson outside of company familiar with project (optional)
Name Company
Address
Phono
Is Literature Available on this Project? (You
may wish to include these citations in Part 6)
Yes No
Additional project information such as site conditions, mode of operation, and other pertinent info
rmation.
28
-------
Vendor Name
Technology Type
PART 6: REPRESENTATIVE APPLICATIONS, CLIENT REFERENCES, AND PERFORMANCE DATA
6.5
Agriculture
Battery recycling/disposal
Chlor-alkali manufacturing
Coal gasification
Dry cleaning
Electroplating
Gasoline service
station/petroleum storage
facility
Herbicide
manufacturing/use
Industrial landfills
Inorganic/organic pigments
Machine shops
Medical wastes
Metal ore mining and smelting
Municipal landfill
Munitions manufacturing
Paint/ink formulation
Pesticide manufacturing/use
Petroleum refining/reuse
Photographic products
Plastics manufacturing
Pulp and paper industry
Other organic chemical
manufacturing
Other inorganic chemical
manufacturing
Semiconductor manufacturing
Rubber manufacturing
Wood preserving
Uranium mining
Other (specify)
Location
City
State/Province:
Country
RCRA corrective action
CERCLA
TSCA
Safe Drinking Water Act
UST corrective action
State (specify)
DoD
DOE
Other (Specify)
Not Applicable
Volume/Quantity Treated
(Units)
Area treated (for in situ projects)
(Units)
Depth treated (for in situ projects)
(Units)
Project took place at site named?
Yes
No
At another site (that is, a Test facility)?
Yes
No
•Full-scale cleanup
Field demonstration
Pilot-scale treatability study
Bench-scale treatability study
RCRA Research, Development,
and Demonstration
TSCA National Demonstration
TSCA Research and Development
EPA SITE Demonstration Program
EPA SITE Emerging Technology
Program
Research
Other (specify)
Soil (in situ)
Soil (ex situ)
Sludge
Solid (for example, slag)
Saturated sediment (in situ)
Saturated sediment (ex situ)
Ground water (in situ)
Off-gas from a primary
treatment technology
Dense nonaqueous phase
liquids (DNAPL) [in situ]
Light nonaqueous phase liquids
(LNAPL) [in situ]
Other:
Bench
Pilot
Full
Contracted
Month(mm)_
Ongoing
Completed
Month(mm)
_ Year (yyyy)
Yes No
Year (vvvv)
29
-------
Vendor Name
Technology Type
PART B: REPRESENTATIVE APPLICATIONS, CLIENT REFERENCES, AND PERFORMANCE DATA
Note: (1)
(2) and (3)
(4)
List one specific contaminant per line. Do not list such entire contaminant groups as VOCs or
solvents. TPH, which can be analyzed using a specific test method, can be listed as an individual
contaminant.
Indicate the appropriate units; for concentrations that were non-detect write N.D.; treated
concentration should be lower than untreated concentration unless the technology is dewatering or
some other volume reduction method. If a concentration range cannot be given, provide an
average and note it as such.
Specify the cleanup standard or goal, if known, for the individual contaminant for this project. For
example, if the project was part of a Superfund remedial action, the cleanup goal is specified in the
record of decision (ROD) for that site.
Performance Data .. • '
(1)
Contaminant or Pollutant
Parameter
(Etismpfef Bmzene
(2{
Untreated
Concentration Range
(Min to Max)
SO- ISO
Conditions or Interference adversely affecting perfor
(3)
Units
mg/kg
<2>
Treated
Concentration Range
(Min to Max)
25-50
[31
Units
mg/kg
•
w - .
Cleanup 'Standard
or Goal
SO "
- - -
'#»..
Units
mg/kg \
mance
Cost Information ' * ' /" . ^ „ V
Estimated or actual total and/or unit cost for this
project
$ per (unit)
$ (total)
What items or activities are included or not included in these cost(s) (for example,
mobilization, demobilization, excavation, waste handling)?
Person outside of company familiar with project (optional)
Name Company
Address
Phono
Is Literature Available on this Project? (You
may wish to include these citations in Part 6)
Yes -No
Additional project information such as site conditions, mode of operation, and other pertinent infoi
mation.
30
-------
Vendor Name
Technology Type
PART 7: LITERATURE AND TECHNICAL REFERENCES
7.1 List and attach available documentation (for example, journal articles, conference papers,
patents) that best describes technology and vendor capabilities. References that contain
performance and cost data are of particular interest. Do not include personal references.
EPA reserves the right to add to the list other publicly available references.
Author(s)
Title
Journal/Conference
Date
NTIS/EPA Document Number(s)
Author(s)
Title
Journal/Conference
Date
NTIS/EPA Document Number(s)
Author(s)
Title
Journal/Conference
Date
NTIS/EPA Document Number(s)
Author(s)
Title
Journal/Conference
Date
NTIS/EPA Document Number(s)
Author(s)
Title
Journal/Conference
Date
NTIS/EPA Document Number(s)
31
-------
THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
-------
APPENDIX A
BUSINESS CLASSIFICATION INFORMATION
The following information is intended to be used as a reference to answer question 1.4. SIC code
information and definitions are given below. To determine if your company is a small and/or
disadvantaged business, first identify the Standard Industrial Classification (SIC) code for your company
and secondly identify whether your company qualifies as a small business under that SIC code. Small
and disadvantaged businesses are defined below.
Definition of SIC Code
Standard Industrial Classification (SIC) Code - refers to the four-digit number assigned by the
government to classify establishments by the type of activity in which they are engaged. The codes are
published by the Government in the Standard Industrial Classification Manual. The Manual is intended
to cover the entire field of economic activities. It classifies and defines activities by industry categories
arid is the source used by the Small Business Administration (SBA) as a guide in defining industries for
size standards. The number of employees or annual receipts indicates the maximum allowed for a
concern, including its affiliates, to be considered small (Federal Acquisition Circular (FAC) 90-43,
Interim Rule 61, Federal Register (FR) 67408, December 20,1996, Federal Acquisition Regulation
(FAR), 19.102(g)).
Most remediation firms should fall under one of the SIC codes defined below.
The following .SIC code definitions are taken from the Standard Industrial Classification Manual, 1987,
Office of Management and Budget.
SIC code 4953: Refuse Systems (i.e., activities related to actual site cleanup) Establishments primarily
engaged in the collection and disposal of refuse by processing or destruction or in the operation of
incinerators, waste treatment plants, landfills, or other sites for disposal of such materials.
Establishments primarily engaged in collecting and transporting refuse without such disposal are
classified in Transportation, Industry 4212.
Acid waste> collection and disposal of
Ashes, collection and disposal of
Dumps, operation of
Garbage: collecting, destroying, and
processing
Hazardous waste material disposal sites
Incinerator operation
Landfill, sanitary: operation of
Radioactive waste materials, disposal of
Refuse systems
Rubbish collection and disposal
Sludge* disposal sites
Street refuse systems
Waste materials disposal at sea
SIC code 8711: Engineering Services (i.e., activities related to remedial investigations, feasibility
studies, and remedial design) Establishments primarily engaged in providing professional engineering
services. Establishments primarily providing and supervising their own engineering staff on temporary
A-l
-------
contract to other firms are included in this industry. Establishments providing engineering personnel, but
not general supervision, are classified in Industry 7363. Establishments primarily engaged in providing
architectural engineering services are classified in Industry 8712, and those providing photogrammetric
engineering services are classified in Industry 8713.
Machine tool designers
Marine engineering services
Petroleum engineering services
• Designing ship, boat, and machine
• Engineering services: industrial, civil,
electrical, mechanical, petroleum,
marine, and design
Definitions of Small and Disadvantaged Business
The following small business size standards established by the SBA are taken from FAR 19.102.
SIC Code Description Size
4953 Refuse Systems $6.0 million
8711 Engineering Services
Military and Aerospace Equipment
and Military Weapons $20.0 million
Marine Engineering and Naval Architecture $13.5 million
Other Engineering Services $2.5 million
The following information is taken from FAR Parts 19-26, Socioeconomic Programs
Small business concern - means a concern, including its affiliates, that is independently owned and
operated, not dominant in the field of operation in which it is bidding on government contracts, and
qualified as a small business under the criteria and size standards in 13 CFR Part 121 (FAR Section
19.102). Such a concern is "not dominant in its field of operation" when it does not exercise a
controlling or major influence on a national basis in a kind of business activity in which a number of
business concerns are primarily engaged. In determining whether dominance exists, consideration shall
be given to all appropriate factors, including volume of business, number of employees, financial
resources, competitive status or position, ownership or control of materials, processes, patents, license
agreements, facilities, sales territory, and nature of business activity.
Small disadvantaged business concern - means a small business concern that is at least 51 percent
unconditionally owned by one or more individuals who are both socially and economically
disadvantaged, or a publicly owned business that has at least 51 percent of its stock unconditionally
owned by one or more socially and economically disadvantaged individuals and that has its management
and daily business controlled by one or more such individuals. This term also means a small business
concern that is at least 51 percent unconditionally owned by an economically disadvantaged Indian tribe
or Native Hawaiian Organization, or a publicly owned business that has at least 51 percent of its stock
unconditionally owned by one of these entities, that has its management and daily business controlled by
A-2
-------
members of an economically disadvantaged Indian tribe or Native Hawaiian Organization, and that meets
the requirements of 13 CFR 124.
(a) "Socially disadvantaged individuals" means individuals who have been subjected to racial or
ethnic prejudice or cultural bias because of their identify as a member of a group without regard to their
qualities as individuals.
(b) "Economically disadvantaged individuals" means socially disadvantaged individuals whose
ability to compete in the free enterprise system is impaired due to diminished opportunities to obtain
capital and credit as compared to others in the same line of business who are not socially disadvantaged.
Individuals who certify that they are members of named groups (Black Americans, Hispanic Americans,
Native Americans, Asian-Pacific Americans, Subcontinent-Asian Americans) are to be considered
socially and economically disadvantaged.
(1) "Subcontinent Asian Americans" means United States citizens whose origins are in
India, Pakistan, Bangladesh, Sri Lanka, Bhutan, or Nepal.
(2) "Asian Pacific Americans" means United States citizens whose origins are in Japan,
China, the Philippines, Vietnam, Korea, Samoa, Guam, the U.S. Trust Territory of the Pacific
Islands (Republic of Palau), the Northern Mariana Islands, Laos, Kampuchea (Cambodia), Taiwan,
Burma, Thailand, Malaysia, Indonesia, Singapore, Brunei, Republic of the Marshall Islands, or the
Federated States of Micronesia.
(3) "Native Americans" means American Indians, Eskimos, Aleuts, and Native
Hawaiians.
(c) "Native Hawaiian Organization" means any community service organization serving Native
Hawaiians in, and chartered as a not-for-profit organization by, the State of Hawaii, which is controlled
by Native Hawaiians, and whose business activities will principally benefit such Native Hawaiians.
(d) "Indian tribe" means any Indian tribe, band, nation, or other organized group or community of
Indians, including any Alaska Native Corporation as defined in 13 CFR 124.100 which is recognized as
eligible for the special programs and services provided by the U.S. to Indians because of their status as
Indians, or which is recognized as such by the State in which such tribe, band, nation, group, or
community resides.
Women-owned small business concern - means a small business concern which is at least 51 percent
owned by one or more women; or, in the case of any publicly owned business, at least 51 percent of the
stock of which is owned by one or more women; and whose management and daily business operations
are controlled by one or more women.
A-3
-------
THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
-------
APPENDIX B
KEY TO CONTAMINANT GROUPS
CONTAMINANT GROUP CODES FOR HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES LIST
Inorganic
Heavy metals
Ti Halogenated volatiles
jg| Halogenated semivolatiles
Nonmetalhc toxic elements (As, F)
Nonnalogenatedvolatiles
Radioactive metals
Nonhalogenated semivolatiles
jT| Asbestos
Organic pesticides/herbicides
Inorganic cyanides
jp~| DiOxins/furans
Inorganic corrosives
Miscellaneous
ij"| Polynuclear aroniatics (PNAs)
S| Explosives/propellants
Organometallic pesticides/herbicides
j| Benzene-toluene-ethylbenzene^xylene(BTEX)
Organic cyanide
f"| Organic corrosives
B-l
-------
Organic Contaminant Group
CAS No.
208968
83329
75070
67641
75058
98862
591082
107028
79061
79107
107131
124049
116063
309002
107186
62533
120127
1912249
2642719
86500
151564
56553
71432
98884
92875
205992
65850
100470
95169
50328
206440
207089
100447
111911
111444
117817
542881
75274
74964
Acenaphthylene H
Acenaphthene H
Acetaldehyde C,I
Acetone C,I
Acetonitrile C,K
Acetophenone D
Acetyl-2-thiourea, 1 D
Acrolein C
Acrylamide D
Acrylic acid C
Acrylonitrile C,K
Adipic acid D
Aldicarb E,D
Aldrin E,B
Allyl alcohol C,I
Aniline D
Anthracene H
Atrazine E,B
Azinphos-ethyl E,D
Azhiphos-methyl E,D
Aziridine C,L
Benz (a) anthracene H
Benzene J
Benzene carbonyl chloride B,L
Benzidine D
Benzofluoranthene,3,4- H
Benzoic acid D
Benzonitrile C,I,K
Benzothiazole,l,2- K
Benzo (a) pyrene H
Benzo (j,k) fluorene H
Benzo (k) fluoranthene H
Benzyl chloride A
Bis (2-chloroethoxy) methane B
Bis (2-chloroethyl) ether B
Bis (2-ethyl hexyl) phthalate D
Bis (chloromethyl) ether B
Bromodichloromethane A
Bromomethane A
CAS No.
1689845 Bromoxynil E,K,B
106990 Butadiene, 1,3- „ C
71363 Butanol C
85687 Butlbenzyl phthalate D
94826 Butyric acid, 4-2(2,4-dichlorop) E,B
133062 Captan B,E
63252 Carbaryl E,D
1563662 Carbofuran E,D
75150 Carbon disulfide C,I
56235 Carbon tetrachloride A,I
78196 Carbophenothion E
75876 Chloral A
57749 Chlordane E,B
106478 Chloroaniline, p- B
108907 Chlorobenzene A
67663 Chloroform A
74873 Chloromethane A
107302 Chloromethyl methyl ether A
106898 Chloromethyloxirane, 2- I,A
91587 Chloronaphthalene, 2- B
95578 Chlorophenol, 2- B
59507 Chloro-3-methylphenol, 4- B
2921882 Chloropyrifos E,D
218019 Chrysene H
56724 Coumaphos E,D
8021394 Creosote H
108394 Qresol, m- D
106445 Qresol, p- D
98828 Cumene C,I
21725462 Cyanazine E,K,B
110827 Cyclohexane C,I
108941 Cyclohexanone C,I
72548 ODD E,B
72559 DDE E,B
50293 DDT E,B
78488 DBF E,D
333415 Diazinon E,D
132649 Dibenzofuran D,H
B-2
-------
Organic Contaminant Group (continued)
CAS No.
53703
124481
96128
106934
1918009
95501
541731
106467
91941
75718
75343
107062
75354
156592
156605
120832
94757
78875
542756
62737
115322
60571
84662
111466
1660942
60515
119904
105679
13113
77781
99650
51285
121142
606202
88857
123911
78342
122667
85007
298044
330541
Dibenz (a,h) anthracene H
Dibromachloromethane A
Dibromo-3-chloropropane, 1,2- A,E
Dibromoethane, 1,2- A,E,I
Dicamba A,B
Dichlordbenzene, 1,2- B
Dichlorobenzene, 1,3- B
Dichlorobenzene, 1,4- B
Dichlorobenzidine, 3,3- B
Dichlorodifluoromethane A
Dichloroethane, 1,1- A
Dichloroethane, 1,2- A
Dichloroethene, 1,1- A
Dichloroethylene, cis-1,2- A
.Dichloroethylene, trans-1,2- A
Dichlorophenol, 2,4- 'B
Dichlorophenoxyacetic acid, 2- E,B
Dichloropropane, 1,2- A
Dichloropropene, 1,3- A
Dichlorvos E,A
Dicofol E,B
Dieldrin E,B
Diethyl phthalate D
Diethylene glycol D,I
Diisopropylmethylphosphonate D
Dimethoate E,D
Dimethoxybenzidine, 3,3- D
Dimethyl phenol, 2,4- D
Dimethyl phthalate . '. D
Dimethyl sulfate C
Dinitrobenzene, 1,3- D
Dinitrophenol, 2,4- D
Dinitrotoluene, 2,4- D,S
Dinitrotoluene, 2,6- D,S
Dinoseb E,D
Dioxane, 1,4 C,I
Dioxathion E,D
Diphenylhydrazine, 1,2- D
Diquat E,D
Disulfoton C,E
Diuron E,D
CAS No.
84742 Di-n-butyl phthalate
117840 Di-n-octyl phthalate
115297 Endosulfan
959988 Endosulfan i
33212659 Endosulfan II
1031078 Endolsulfan sulfate
145733 Endothall
72208 Endrin
7421934 Endrin aldehyde
563122 Ethion
141786 Ethyl acetate
100414 Ethyl benzene
75003 Ethyl chloride
60297 Ethyl ether
107211 Ethylene glycol
110805 Ethylene glycol monoethyl
ether
759944 Ethylpropylthio carbomate, S-
D
D
E,B
E,B
E,B
E,B
E,D
E,B
E,B
E,D
122145 Fenitrothion ..
86737 Fluorene
50000 Formaldehyde
64186 Formic acid ..
110009 Furan
98011 Furfural
E,D
E,D
H
C,L
C
765344 Glycidyaldehyde C
76448 Heptachlor
1024573 Heptachlor epoxide
118741 Hexachlorobenzene
87683 Hexachlorobutadiene
60873 Hexachlorocyclohexane, alpha-
60873 Hexachlorocyclohexane, beta-
60873 Hexachlorocyclohexane, delta-
77474 Hexachlorocyclopentadiene ..
67721 Hexachloroethane
70304 Hexachlorophene
110543 Hexane
B,E
B,E
B,E
E,B
E,B
E,B
B
B
B
B-3
-------
Organic Contaminant Group (continued)
CAS No.
1689834 loxynil E,K,B
78831 Isobutanol C,I
78591 Isophorone D,I
143500 Kepone E,B
58899 Lindane E,B
121755 Malathion B,E
108316 Maleic anhydride D
123331 Malerichydrazide E,D
126987 Methacrylonitrile , C,K
67561 Methanol C,I
16752775 Methomyl E,D
72435 Methoxychlor B,E
79221 Methyl chlorocarbonate QL
78933 Methyl ethyl ketone C,I
108101 Methyl isobutyl ketone C,I
80626 Methyl methacrylate C
101144 Methylene bis
(2-chloroaniline) B
75092 Methylene chloride A,I
23855 Mirex E,B
91203 Naphthalene H
100016 Nitroaniline, p- ,..., P
98953 Nitrobenzene D
100027 Nitrophenol, 4- D
1116547 Nitrosodiethanolamine, n- D
55185 Nitrosodiethylamine, n- D
62759 Nitrosodimethylamine, n- ...,, P
86306 Nitrosodiphenylamine, n- D
930552 Nitrosopyrrolidine, n- ,.. P
924163 Nitroso-di-n-butylamine, n- P
615532 Nitroso-di-n-methylurethane, n- P
99990 Nitrotoluene, 4- P
56382 Parathion, ethyl- E,P
298000 Parathion, methyl- E,P
1336363 PCBs G
608935 Pentachlorobenzene B
76017 Pentachloroethane A
CAS No.
82688
87865
85018
108952
139662
62384
298022
75445
13171216
85449
23950585
129000
110861
91225
108463
299843
57249
100425
746016
95943
630206
79345
127184
58902
3689245
109999
137268
108883
584849
8001352
93721
75252
120821
71556
79005
79016
75694
Pentachloronitrobenzene
Pentachlorophenol
Phenanthrene
Phenol
Phenyl sulfide
Phenylmercurie acetate
Phorate
Phosgene
Phosphamidon
Phthalic anhydride . . , ,
Pronamide
Pyrene
Pyridine
Quinoline
Resorcinol
Ronnel
Strychnine
Styrene
TCPP
Tetrachlorobenzene, 1,2,4,5-
Tetrachloroethane, 1,1,1,2-
Tetrachloroethane, 1,1,2,2-
Tetrachloroethene
Tetrachlorophenol, 2,3,4,6
Tetraethyldithiopyrophosphate . . .
Tetrahydrofuran
Thiram
Toluene
Toluene diisocyanate
Toxaphene
TP, 2,4,5- (Silvex) ,
Tribromomethane
Trichlorobenzene, 1,2,4- ........
Trichloroethane, 1,1,1-
Trichloroethane, 1,1,2-
Trichloroethylene
Trichlorofluoromethane
... B
. . . B,E
... H
... P
... P
. . . E,T
. . . C,E
. . . A,E,L
. . . E,P
... P
... P
... H
. . . C,I
H
... P
. . . E,B
. . . E,H
C
... F
... B
. . . A,E,I
. . . A,E,I
. . . A,I
... B
. . . E,P
. . . C,I
. . . E,P
... J
. . . P,L
. . . B,E
. . . E,B
...A
... B
. . . A,I
. . . A,I
...A
. . . A,I
B-4
-------
Organic Contaminant Group (continued)
CAS No.
933788 Trichlorpphenql, 2,3,5- B
95954 Trichlorophenol, 2,4,5- ,. B
88062 Trichlorophenol, 2,4,6- B
609198 Trichlorophenol, 3,4,5- ., B
93765 Trichlorophenoxyacetic acid, 2,4,5- .. E,B
933788 Trichloro-l,2,2-trifluoroethane ..,... A,I
27323417 Triethanolamine D
126727 Tris (2,3-dibromopropyl) phosphate .. B
108054 Vinyl acetate , ••..,. C
75014 Vinyl chloride A
81812 Warfarin E,D
108383 Xylene, m- J
95476 Xylene, o, ....,,., , J
106423 Xylene, p- J
Inorganic Contaminant Group
7429905 Aluminum X
20859738 Aluminum phosphide .. ?,..., N
7440360 Antimony , M
7440382 Arsenic M
1327533 Arsenic trioxide ...., M
1303339 Arsenic trisulfide M
7440393 Barium .... , M
542621 Barium cyanide .................. M,Q
7440417 Beryllium , T X
7440439 Cadmium M
13765190 Calcium chromate ...... M
7778543 Calcium hypochjorite R
1333820 Chromic acid ,.,, , M,R
7440473 Chromium M
Chromium (III) ?..., M
Chromium (VI) M
7440484 Cobalt .,..., M
7440508 Copper , M
544923 Copper cyanide ,.. M,Q
CAS No.
7720787 Ferrous sulfate M
7439896 Iron , M
7439921 Lead
M
7439965 Manganese , M
7439976 Mercury M
7440020 Nickel ,, r,,., M
7718549 Nickel chloride ..,..: M
10102440 Nitrogen dioxide R
7803512 Phosphine N
7789006 Potassium chromate ... ,....., M
151508 Potassium cyanide Q
506616 Potassium silver cyanide M,Q
7783008 Selenious acid . ,.. N,R
7782492 Selenium , N
7440224 Silver ,.......:,., M
506649 Silver cyanide r ? M,Q
7440235 Sodium (metallic) R
26628228 Sodium azide S
7681494 Sodium fluoride , N
7775113 Sodium chromate ................ M
143339 Sodium cyanide Q
1310732 Sodium hydroxide R
1314325 Thallic oxide M
7440280 Thallium M
563688 Thallium acetate M
6533739 Thallium carbonate , M
7791120 Thallium chloride M
10102451 Thallium nitrate ,... M
12039520 Thallium selenide M
7446186 Thallium (I) sulfate M
7440291 Thorium , , O
B-5
-------
Inorganic Contaminant Group (continued)
CAS No.
1314621 Vanadium pentoxide M,R
7440666 Zinc X
557211 Zinc cyanide Q
1314847 Zinc phosphide N
7733020 Zincsulfate X
Esploslve/Propellants
7664417 Ammonia R
131748 Ammonium picrate S
7773060 Ammonium sulfamate S
460195 Cyanogen S,E
2691410 Cyclotetramethylenetetranitramine ... S
302012 Hydrazine S
55630 Nitroglycerine S
99990 Nitrotoluene, 4- S
26628228 Sodium azide S
99354 Trinitrobenzene, 1,3,5 S
118967 Trinitrotoluene S
Organometallic Compound
63294 Phenylmercurie acetate E,T
630104 Selenourea N
78002 Tetraethyl lead M
B-6
------- |