TECH TRENDS
   Ground Water Currents
                                   A newsletter about soil, sediment, and ground-water characterization and remediation technologies
                                                                                                           September 2002
Issue 2
     Sediment Capping Pilot Study Conducted on Grasse River
r* rom July to October 2001, Alcoa Inc. studied
the potential for constructing a  full-scale
subaqueous  cap  to isolate or  reduce
polychlorinatedbiphenyl (PCB) concentrations
in sediments, water, and biota of the lower
Grasse River near Massena, NY. The pilot
study evaluated capping  as  a  remedial
alternative for the river  and  provided
information on technical implementation,
potential short-term effects of construction, and
the cost of the cap. Various capping materials
were placed into a 750-foot stretch of the river
using different placement techniques. The study
found that  a cap of acceptable uniformity,
thickness, and composition could be placed
without significant PCB entrainment from the
in-place sediments and without significant
impacts to water quality. Optimal results were
achieved at this site using a sand/topsoil
capping material applied with a  clamshell
attached to a barge-mounted crane.

The study site consisted of 7 acres located in a
stretch of the river containing fine-grained
sediment. As a result of previous manufacturing
operations,  PCB concentrations of up to 11.5
mg/kg were identified in surface sediment.
Capping materials were tested in four cells
during two project phases.

The first phase was designed to assess a variety
of capping materials and application methods
in a cell comprising  five subcells ranging in
size from 19,000 to 38,000 sq ft. Using one to
three application lifts, four different capping
materials were evaluated at thicknesses of 0.75-
1.0 ft: a sand/topsoil (1:1  ratio) mixture,
granular bentonite, a sand/soil/bentonite slurry,
and AquaBlok™ (a commercial bentonite clay/
gravel composite).
          Sand/topsoil and AquaBlok materials were
          installed using a crane-mounted clamshell that
          released the materials at various water depths.
          To accomplish this, an equipment barge carrying
          an 80-ton crane  was outfitted  with a 2.5-yd
          mechanical clamshell bucket. Capping materials
          were prepared at an on-shore staging area and
          placed on a separate barge. Accurate horizontal
          control of the bucket, a key element of successful
          cap placement,  was achieved using global
          positioning system software (WINOPS™) and
          physical markers on the equipment. Apneumatic
          broadcasting technique was used to apply the
          granular bentonite  material, and a subsurface
          tremie method was employed to inject the sand/
          soil/bentonite slurry. All capping work  was
          cordoned  off using a single silt curtain  that
          extended from the water surface to within a few
          feet of the river bottom.

          The second phase of pilot testing was conducted
          in three 50,000-sq-ft cells. Evaluation criteria
          included   cap  coverage  characteristics,
          entrainment of contaminants into the cap, water
          quality impacts, placement rates, logistic issues,
          and costs.  A cap thickness of 1 ft was targeted
          for two of the cells, while a thickness of 2 ft was
          targeted for the third. With the exception of
          AquaBlok (on which tests were  completed
          during the first phase) capping materials and
          techniques tested in each of the three cells were
          similar to those tested during the first phase.

          Approximately 900 water samples and  490
          sediment samples were collected and analyzed
          during the study. The results show that over 95%
          of the PCB concentrations in core samples taken
          through the pilot cell cap materials were at non-
          detect levels (below 0.1 mg/kg). Mixing of the

                             [continued on page 2]
                                                                   Contents
 Sediment Capping
 Pilot Study Conducted
 on Grasse River          page 1

 Food-Grade Oil
 Injections Used to
 Stimulate Reductive
 Dechlorination            page 2

 In-Situ Chemical
 Oxidation Pilot
 Conducted for CVOCs
 in Fractured Bedrock      page 3

 Electrochemical
 Remediation
 Technologies Remove
 Mercury in Soil           page 5

 New Resources for
 Contaminated
 Sediment Management    page 6
   Technical Training
  Seminars Available
          On-Line
As part of its continued efforts to
provide technical training
webcasts, the U.S. EPA Technol-
ogy Innovation Office (TIO)
recently held a "Perchlorate
Update" workshop online. This
workshop disseminated current
information  on contamination
problems posed by perch lorate.
To view the  perchlorate workshop
materials or participate in future
webcast training, visit TIO's CLU-
IN website at www.clu-in.org.
                                                                                                       Recycled/Recyclable
                                                                                                      I Printed with Soy-Canola Ink on paper that
                                                                                                       contains at least 50% recycled fiber

-------
[continued from page 1]

cap material with underlying sediment, where
it did occur, generally was limited to the lowest
1-2 inches of  capping  material. PCB
concentrations in water downstream of the
cells were below the analytical detection limit
(50 ng/L) (Figure 1).

Water quality monitoring during cap placement
indicated that no significant releases of PCBs
(as shown in Figure 1), total suspended solids,
or turbidity occurred during the project.
Additionally, post-capping analyses of the
site's benthic community showed evidence of
recolonization of the capped area within three
weeks of the capping completion. Post-
capping monitoring of the bathymetry (river-
bottom profile) after the first winter shows the
cap thickness remains stable.

Unit costs to implement the capping activities
(excluding mobilization, silt curtains, design,
monitoring, and management) averaged $2.15/
sq ft for the 1-ft cap and $3.10/sq ft for the 2-
ft cap. Total costs for the study are expected
to  range from $3.5 million to $4.0 million.
Project monitoring will continue at the Grasse
River study site throughout 2002.

Contributed by Larry McShea (Alcoa Inc.)
at  724-337-5458 or
larry.mcshea @alcoa. com; Mary Logan
(U.S. EPA/Region 2) at 212-637-4321 or
losan. mary@ epa. sov; and Joseph Mihm
(Camp Dresser & McKee) at 315-769-7011
or mihmie @ cdm. com
             Food-Grade Oil Injections Used to Stimulate
                        Reductive Dechlorination
 The  U.S.   Air  Force   Center  for
 Environmental Excellence (AFCEE) and Air
 Education and Training Command (AETC)
 teamed with Altus Air Force Base (AFB) to
 sponsor field studies on the use of vegetable
 oil for stimulating  in-situ anaerobic
 bioremediation of chlorinated solvents. Full-
 scale applications at several  military sites
 indicate  that the technology can reduce
 contaminant concentrations at a lower cost
 than conventional methods such as pump
 and treat. Most recently, results from a pilot
 study at Altus AFB, OK, showed over 90%
 reduction in  trichloroethene  (TCE)
 concentrations within eight months.

 The process blends food-grade vegetable oil
 and surfactants in a high-speed mixer to
 generate an oil-in-water emulsion with a
 small droplet size that can be distributed
 easily throughout  the subsurface. The
 emulsion is injected  through permanent
 wells or temporary direct-push points. Water
 is subsequently injected to distribute and
 immobilize the oil. The optimum oil droplet
 size and surfactant characteristics for each
 site are determined through laboratory
 testing.

 Historical  solvent releases of degreasing
 agents at Altus AFB resulted in a 5,000-ft-
 long chlorinated solvent plume with TCE
                                                                       detection
                                                                         limit
                                                                       (50 ng/L)
                             concentrations reaching 78,000 |J,g/L in the
                             source area. Geology at the site consists
                             of reddish-brown,  moderately plastic,
                             sandy clay to a depth of roughly 15 ft,
                             underlain by fractured clayey shale with
                             occasional gypsum  layers. The depth to
                             ground water is 8-10 ft below ground
                             surface (bgs). Most ground-water flow and
                             contaminant transport appears to occur
                             through a series of weathered shale
                             fractures located immediately beneath the
                             surficial clay and within a thick gypsum
                             layer approximately 35 ft below grade.
                             Field observations suggest a ground-water
                             velocity approaching 100 ft/yr.

                             The pilot study is evaluating the use of
                             vegetable oil as a low-cost carbon source
                             for  controlling chlorinated  solvent
                             migration through  enhanced anaerobic
                             bioremediation. A line of six permanent 2-
                             inch PVC wells spaced 5 ft apart was
                             installed perpendicular to ground-water
                             flow approximately 250 ft downgradient
                             from the source area. Over a 4-day period
                             in December 2001, a mixture of emulsified
                             soybean oil, yeast extract, and lactate was
                             injected through each well to form a 30-ft-
                             wide vegetable oil barrier that would
                             stimulate reductive dehalogenation.

                             Each injection was designed to treat a 6-
                             ft-diameter area that would provide a small
                             overlap between adjacent injection points.
                             To achieve maximum distribution of the
                             treatment mixture in the upper weathered
                             fracture zone, the wells were screened from
                             8 to  18 ft bgs. The cost of installing the six
                             barrier wells and injecting the mixture was
                             $18,000, or $600/linear ft of barrier.

                             Monitoring of adjoining wells during the
                             injection  process showed  that  the
                                            [continued on page 3]
              500 Feet
              Upstream
Immediately
Outside Silt
  Curtain
 750 Feet
Downstream
    *Pilot cell #1 (of first phase) is not illustrated.
   **A value of 1/2 the detection limit (25 ng/L) was assigned to non-detect readings when calculating averages.
Figure 1. Capping studies on the Grasse
River showed minimal impact on surface
water quality.

-------
 Figure 2. TCE concentrations at the
 Altus AFB pilot study site dropped
 immediately after injection of vegetable
 oil.
[continued from page 2]

 emulsified oil was distributed to a distance of
 more than 20 ft from the injection points. TCE
 concentrations  dropped immediately after
 injection due to dilution and/or sorption to
 the oil. By August 2002, however, TCE and
 ds-dichloroethene (DCE) had rebounded and
 total ethenes had returned to a level exceeding
 90% of the preinjection concentration. These
 changes indicated that dilution/sorption no
 longer was significant and that any reduction
 in contaminant concentrations was due to
 biodegradation.

 Data obtained from one of the six injection
 wells indicated that the TCE concentration
 had declined from 1,300  \igfL to 98 \igfL
 (Figure 2), with 64% of the original TCE and
 DCE recovered as ethane. Similar TCE
 reductions were identified in a monitor well
 located 20 ft downgradient from the barrier,
 where the concentration dropped from 1,660
 |j,g/L to 20 |J,g/L. Concentrations of vinyl
 chloride  (an intermediate break-down
 product) had increased over the 8-month
 period, indicating that conversion of TCE to
 ethane was incomplete. Additional monitoring
 is underway to determine if the barrier width
 should be increased to achieve complete
 conversion of vinyl chloride to ethene.

 Final results from the pilot test will be used to
 evaluate potential application of edible oils
 for full-scale remediation of ground water at
 Altus AFB. This pilot, as well as previous
 applications at Dover AFB and Edwards AFB,
 demonstrate the potential for application of
 this process in a flow-through barrier for
 controlling chlorinated solvent migration.
 Previous commercial applications suggest that
 this technology also could be used to treat
 source-area hot spots and to enhance natural
 attenuation of contaminants. Laboratory
 studies are planned to  evaluate the use of this
 approach for treatment of other pollutants,
 including nitrate, perchlorate, chromium,
 radionuclides, and acid mine drainage.
          16OO -i
                                              TCE
                                              c/s-DCE
                                              vinyl chloride
                                              ethene + ethane
                  Pre-lnjection
                                1 Day After
                                 Injection
  4 Months After
     Injection
8 Months After
   Injection
This project is part of the AFCEE Enhanced
Bioremediation  Initiative,  which  is
investigating other low-cost substrates such
as molasses, direct hydrogen sparging, and
bark mulch in a trench application [see the
July 2002 issue of Technology News and
Trends]. The U.S. Air Force, Navy, and Army
also are  developing a joint Tri-Service
guidance manual to outline criteria for
selecting  appropriate carbon substrates and
cost estimating  tools in bioremediation
applications.
Contributed by Dr. Bob Borden (Solutions-
IBS) at 919-873-1060 or
rborden @ solutions-ies. com; Jim Gonzales
(HQ/AFCEE) at 210-536-4324 or
james.gonzales@brooks.af.mil; Steven
Daneke (HQ/AETC) at 210-652-3302 or
steven.daneke@randolph.af.mil; and Dr.
Michael Lee (Terra Systems, Inc.) at 302-
798-9553 or mlee @ terrasvstems. net
      In-Situ Chemical Oxidation Pilot Conducted for CVOCs
                           in Fractured Bedrock
 A recent pilot program undertaken by the
 Naval Facilities Engineering Command at
 the South Weymouth Naval Air  Station
 (NAS), MA, illustrates the challenges posed
 by contaminants  in fractured-bedrock
 aquifers. In-situ chemical oxidation (ISCO)
 based on Fenton's chemistry was performed
 to assess the technology's effectiveness in
 destroying chlorinated volatile organic
 compounds (CVOCs) in this type of setting.
 Although initial post-injection sampling
 showed overall contaminant reductions in
 ground water, subsequent sampling indicated
 significant contaminant rebound.

 From the 1940s through the 1990s, the
 2,800-sq-mi NAS study site was used for
 vehicle  maintenance. As a result, shallow
 subsurface CVOC releases became mixed
 with waste oil leaking from an underground
 storage tank. The site is underlain by
approximately 6 m of silty sands, beneath
which exists a fractured granite formation.
The water table is located approximately 3
mbelow ground surface (bgs). Ground water
flows horizontally in both the overburden
and bedrock, which are in direct hydraulic
connection.

Slug tests and packer pressure tests in the
bedrock treatment zone indicated a hydraulic
conductivity ranging from 4.3 x 10"5 to 2.6
x 10"4 cm/s. An average fracture aperture of
156-349 mm was measured, and an effective
porosity of 1.03 x  10'3 to  2.86 x 10'3
calculated. Based on these parameters, the
bedrock treatment zone was  estimated to
contain approximately 36,000 liters of water
and to require  88-243  days to flush one
fracture volume through the zone.

                 [continued on page 4]

-------
[continued from page 3]

The 90-m CVOC plume, ranging in width
from 20 to 45 m, extended 30 m below the
top of the fractured bedrock (35-40 m bgs)
prior to ISCO treatment. Baseline sampling
found that total CVOC concentrations in two
wells exceeded 1,000 mg/L. In the remaining
43 pilot wells, 14 indicated concentrations of
100-1,000 mg/L and 29 indicated less than 100
mg/L. The cross-sectional distribution of
C VOCs with depth does not provide evidence
of DNAPL pools. Based on the  persistence
and pattern of CVOC rebound modeled over
time, however, DNAPL may exist in poorly
connected, soil-clogged fractures near the
overburden-bedrock interface.

The ISCO process employed at the NAS
involved simultaneous injection of hydrogen
peroxide and a ferrous sulfate catalyst into the
overburden and fractured bedrock zones. The
first phase of injections, which occurred in
October 2000, employed 48 injectors spaced
at 3 m intervals. Of these, 20  were screened
across the saturated portion of the overburden
and 28 were screened within the fractured
bedrock. Prior to the second (final) injection
phase in March 2001, three additional bedrock
injectors were installed to improve fracture
             accessibility. A total of 9,233 liters of peroxide
             and 28,174 liters of catalyst was injected.

             Pilot  results   indicate  that  CVOC
             concentrations in ground water within the
             bedrock were  depressed during and
             immediately following each phase of injection
             but rebounded over time at many of the
             observation points. Figure 3 presents data from
             two representative observation points. A well
             outside the treatment zone shows the peroxide
             and  catalyst  (represented  by  iron)
             equilibriating, thereby allowing the CVOCs
             and BTEX to rebound. A well in the center of
             the treatment zone shows  the continued
             persistence of catalyst, which may  be
             artificially depressing the CVOC and BTEX
             concentrations.

             Analysis of monitoring  data suggests that a
             significant amount of dilution occurred due
             to the addition of peroxide and catalyst (iron).
             Increased concentrations of dissolved oxygen,
             as  indirect measures of CVOC breakdown
             and/or  the presence  of  hydrogen peroxide,
             were observed in 77% of the monitoring wells.
             Data suggested that 9-12 months were needed
             for the  bedrock system to flush the injected
             fluids and for CVOC concentrations to  re-
             equilibrate.
                      Although limited success of ISCO treatment
                      was achieved at the South Weymouth NAS,
                      the pilot refined delineation of the residual
                      contamination  source, improved unders-
                      tanding about the interconnectivity of the
                      bedrock fractures, and better defined the
                      applications and limitations of ISCO treatment
                      in a fractured-bedrock setting. To more fully
                      characterize the current aquifer conditions,
                      efforts are underway to further assess the
                      overburden-bedrock interface, the potential
                      DNAPL source areas, and the treatability
                      parameters for alternate remedies. Potential
                      technologies for this site include the injection
                      of alternate oxidants and stimulated anaerobic
                      microbial degradation.

                      Contributed by Mark Krivansky (Naval
                      Facilities Engineering Command) at 610-
                      595-0567 or
                      krivanskyme @ efane. navfac. navy, mil; Mark
                      Kauffman (ENSR International) at 978-
                      589-3000 or mkauffman @ ensr. com; Bill
                      Brandon (U.S. EPA/Regionl) at 617-918-
                      1391 or brandon.bill@epa.sov; and Patty
                      Marajh-Whittemore (U.S. EPA/Region 1) at
                      617-918-1382 or
                      whittemore. vattv @ eva. sov
                              Well Located 2 Meters Outside Treatment Zone
     1000

      100

  1    101
  o
  o
        1 •
      0.1
          Saseline Sampling
October 2000
 Treatment
March 2001
 Treatment
     1000
                          Well Located in Approximate Center of Treatment Zone
-*- total CVOCs (|ig/L)
-6- total BTEX (jig/L)
—  total iron (ng/L)
 •  peroxide (mg/L)
  en
  c
  O
  "5
  o
  O
                                                                                 Figure 3. While contaminant reductions
                                                                                 significant rebound occurred in others.

-------
                Electrochemical Remediation Technologies Remove Mercury in Soil
.Pilot- and full-scale in-situ remediation
projects were conducted at several European
sites to evaluate the use of innovative
electrochemical remediation technologies
(known as "ECRTs") forremoval of mercury
and other metals from soil. Based on these
project results and recent bench-scale testing,
the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) is
considering an ECRTs field pilot for removal
of mercury and other heavy metals at the
National Security Complex (Y-12) near Oak
Ridge, IN. Cost reduction is the maj or driver
for DOE to seek alternative cleanup
technologies such as these. ECRTs require
low levels of electrical energy input
compared to other electrical methods such
as traditional electrokinetics, joule heating,
and vitrification. In addition, ECRTs
generally are effective within months, instead
of years, and can be performed in-situ or ex-
situ.

ECRTs involve the passage of low-voltage/
amperage AC/DC current between an
electrode pair to create metallic complexes.
The ion complexes, as well as ionic metals,
are mobilized via the electrokinetic gradient
to both the anode and cathode for deposition.
These deposits then can be removed and
recycled. In contrast to electrokinetics,
ECRTs electrically polarize the soil to
generate reduction-oxidation (redox)
reactions at the pore scale, creating mobile
species of the target contaminants that
migrate to the electrodes. Field remediation
projects suggest that the overall reaction rates
of the electrochemical process are inversely
proportional to grain size of the soil or
sediment undergoing treatment.

These technologies were demonstrated at the
Union Canal in Scotland, where an average
total mercury (elemental and methyl
mercury) concentration of 243 mg/kg was
present in the silt of a 1.1 -m-deep, brackish-
water canal. Over a 26-day period, 220 cubic
meters of contaminated silt were treated.
Approximately 5.6 kW of electrical power
was applied to two electrode pairs placed
within the silt at positions parallel to the canal
banks. After 12 days of treatment, the average
total mercury concentration dropped to 119
mg/kg. The target goal  (20 mg/kg) was
exceeded by the end of the demonstration, at
which time the average mercury concentration
was 6.5 mg/kg. A total of 76 kg (168 Ibs) of
metal deposits, primarily consisting  of
mercury, accumulated on the electrodes.

Bench-scale testing of mercury-contaminated
soil from DOE's Y-12 facility corroborated
previous ECRTs field results. The test was
conducted on  homogenized soil having an
average total mercury concentration of 252
mg/kg. Chemical analysis of the soil showed
it contained up to 12,000 mg/kg of iron, which
created conditions for high electrical
conductivity and  allowed for laboratory
simulation of the ECRTs process.

After 741 hours of testing on the Y-12 soil,
the total mercury concentration in soil near
the anode increased to more than 530 mg/kg
(>120% relative to baseline). In soil near the
cathode, the total mercury concentration
decreased by approximately 60%. Post-test
chemical analysis of the electrodes themselves
indicated that the anode accumulated about
four times  more  total mercury than the
cathode. The combined chemical data from
soil and electrode analyses indicated that
mercury was migrating and depositing at both
electrodes. This generation and migration of
both positive and negative chemical species
to  their respective electrodes  distinguishes
ECRTs  from classical electrokinetics
techniques.

Preliminary engineering cost estimates for
ECRTs range from $135/yd3 (for volumes of
3,000 yd3) to $42/yd3 (for volumes exceeding
100,000 yd3). An ECRTs demonstration also
is being conducted by the U.S. Army Corps
of Engineers, the U.S. EPA Great Lakes
National Program Office, and the Minnesota
Pollution Control Agency to evaluate its use
in  removing  polycyclic  aromatic
hydrocarbons (PAHs) in  fresh-water
sediments of Lake Superior. In addition,
the Washington State Department of
Ecology and King County, WA, are
cooperating with  the U.S. EPA in a
Superfund  Innovative  Technology
Evaluation (SITE) Program demonstration
of the technologies' ability to reduce
concentrations of PAHs, mercury, and
phenols in marine sediments.

Contributed by John Michael Japp
(DOE/Oak Ridge Operations Office) at
865-241-6344 or jappjm @ oro. doe, sov;
Karen Cohen (DOE/National Energy
Technology Laboratory) at 412-386-
6667 or cohen@netl.doe.sov; Folk
Doering (P2-Soil Remediation, Inc.);
and Joe lovenitti (Weiss Associates/The
Providence Group/ADA Technologies,
Inc.) at 510-450-6141 orjli@weiss.com
            Contact Us
    Technology News and Trends
           is on the NET!

  View, download, subscribe, and
           unsubscribe at:
       http://www.epa.gov/tio
           http://clu-in.org
      Technology News and Trends
      welcomes readers' comments
       and contributions. Address
          correspondence to:
             Ann Eleanor
     Technology Innovation Office
               (5102G)
 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
          Ariel Rios Building
      1200 Pennsylvania Ave, NW
        Washington, DC 20460
         Phone: 703-603-7199
          Fax: 703-603-9135

-------
               Technology
             News and Trends
Solid Waste and
Emergency Response
(5102G)
EPA 542-N-02-004
September 2002
Issue No. 2
United States
Environmental Protection Agency
National Service Center for Environmental Publications
P.O. Box 42419
Cincinnati, OH 45242


Official Business
Penalty for Private Use $300
    PRESORTED
    FIRST CLASS
 US POSTAGE PAID
EPA PERMIT NO. G-35
     EPA is publishing this newsletter as a means of disseminating useful information regarding innouatiue and
   alternative treatment techniques and technologies. The Agency does not endorse specific technology vendors.
                      New Resources for Contaminated Sediment Management
    Sediment experts representing a variety of research organizations recently collaborated in developing an 88-page white paper,
    Critical Issues in Contaminated Sediment Management. The white paper addresses a range of technical issues:
                                      Assessment of monitored natural recovery
           Monitoring of remedial effectiveness

                    Conceptual site models


                 Contaminant bioavailability


    I Characterization of the spatial extent of contamination
                            In-situ bioaccumulation tests

                            Sediment toxicity testing


                            Ecological assessment tools


                Field screening or rapid sediment characterization tools
    The white paper was published by the Marine Environmental Support Office of the U.S. Navy (publication number MESO-02-TM-
    01) and is available on the SedWebSM bulletin board at www.sediments.org/sedmgt.html. Other sediment-related information, including
    on-line discussions and audio web lectures, can be found on SedWeb as a service of the Hazardous Substance Research Centers/
    South & Southwest.

-------