EPA-542-R-93-003
Number 5
September 1993
INNOVATIVE TREATMENT TECHNOLOGIES:
ANNUAL STATUS REPORT
(Fifth Edition)
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response
Technology Innovation Office
Washington, DC 20460
-------
NOTICE
This material has been funded wholly or in part by the United States Environmental Protection Agency under contract number
68-C0-0047. Mention of trade names or commercial products does not constitute endorsement or recommendation for use. To
obtain a copy of this report, fill out the request form on the next page and mail or fax it to:
U.S. EPA/NCEPI
P.O. Box 42419
Cincinnati, OH 45242
Fax Number: 513-891-6685
-------
September 1993
INNOVATIVE TREATMENT TECHNOLOGIES:
ANNUAL STATUS REPORT
EPA 542-R-93-O03
Document Request Form
This report is distributed once a year to Superfund management in U.S. EPA Headquarters and regional offices, pertinent EPA laboratories,
states, EPA libraries, and representatives of other federal agencies. All project contacts listed in the report also receive a copy. If you would
like your name added to or deleted from the mailing list for future reports, please complete the following form and send or fax it to:
U.S. EPA/EPIC
P.O. Box 42419
Cincinnati, OH 45242-2419
Fax number: 513-891-6685
~ Please add my name and address to the mailing list: ~ Please remove my name and address from the mailing list.
Name
Company :
Street or P.O. Box
City : State ' Zip
~ My name is already on the mailing list. Please change the name and address
FROM: TO:
If you would like copies of this fifth edition of the Innovative Treatment Technologies: Annual Status Report, mail or fax to NCEPI and
ask for it by number, EPA 542-R-93-003.
iii
-------
Intentionally Blank Page
-------
FOREWORD
In April 1990, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response (OSWER)
established the Technology Innovative Office (TIO) to promote the use of innovative treatment technologies for contaminated site
cleanup. TIO's mission is to encourage government and industry to increase the use of innovative treatment technology to mitigate
contaminated waste sites, soils and ground water. One of TIO's goals is the removal of regulatory and institutional barriers to the
development and use of innovative technologies. Another is the provision of richer technology and market information to target
audiences, including federal agencies, states, consulting engineering firms, responsible parties, technology developers, technology
vendors and the investment community.
This report documents the status of innovative treatment technology use in the Superfund program. To a lesser extent, the report presents
information on innovative treatment projects at non-Superfund sites under the jurisdiction of the Department of Defense and the
Department of Energy. We have changed the format of the report this year by breaking it into three chapters presenting Superfund
remedial actions, removal actions, and non-Superfund sites, respectively. We have also expanded the report to include many new
innovative projects selected by EPA in fiscal year 1992 and numerous graphics and tables to assist the reader in understanding the data.
We hope that this information will allow better communication between experienced technology users and those who are considering
innovative technologies to clean up contaminated sites, as well as enabling technology vendors to evaluate the market for innovative
treatment technologies in Superfund for the next several years.
The use of innovative treatment technologies in Superfund and other EPA waste programs is addressed by a directive, Furthering the
Use of Innovative Treatment Technologies in OSWER Programs (OSWER Directive 9380.0-17, June 10,1991). This directive sets
forth seven initiatives to remove impediments from and create incentives for the use of innovative treatment technologies for Superfund,
corrective action under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA), and underground storage tank cleanups. It is hoped that
efforts such as the directive and this document will increase the reliance on new, less costly, or more effective technologies to address
the problems associated with Superfund and other hazardous waste sites, and petroleum contamination.
Walter W. Kovalick, Jr. Ph.D.
Director, Technology Innovation Office
iv
-------
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
This document was prepared under the direction of Ms. Linda Fiedler, work assignment manager for the U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency's Technology Innovation Office.
Special acknowledgement is due the Regional and state staff listed as contacts for individual sites. They provided the detailed
information in this document. Their cooperation and willingness to share their knowledge and expertise on innovative treat-
ment technologies encourages the application of those technologies at other sites.
-------
ABSTRACT
This yearly report (formerly published twice a year) documents and analyzes the selection and use of innovative treatment technologies
in the U.S. EPA Superfund Program and at some non-Superfund sites under the jurisdiction of the Departments of Defense (DoD) and
Energy (DOE). The status of every project has been updated, and projects selected in fiscal year 1992 Superfund Records of Decision
(ROD) are included. The information will allow better communication between experienced technology users and those who are
considering innovative technologies to clean up contaminated sites. In addition, the information will enable technology vendors to
evaluate the market for innovative technologies in Superfund for the next several years. It also will be used by EPA's Technology
Innovation Office to track progress in the application of innovative treatment technologies.
Alternative treatment technologies are alternatives to land disposal. Innovative treatment technologies are alternative treatment
technologies the use of which at Superfund and similar sites is inhibited by lack of data on cost and performance. This report documents
the use of the following innovative treatment technologies to treat ground water (in situ), soils, sediments, sludge, and solid-matrix
wastes:
Bioremediation (Ex Situ) • In situ vitrification • Other technologies (air sparging,
Bioremediation (In Situ) • Soil vapor extraction contained recovery of oil wastes,
Chemical treatment • Soil washing limestone barriers and fuming
Dechlorination ~ Solvent extraction gasification)
In situ flushing ~ Thermal desorption
The document includes information on 263 applications of innovative treatment technologies for remedial actions, 33 applications for
removal actions, and 28 applications under other federal programs. Chapters 1,2, and 3 contain detailed, site-specific information for
Superfund remedial and removal sites, at which innovative treatment has been selected or used. The information for these chapters was
collected through analyses of RODs, review of OSWER tracking systems, and interviews with EPA regional, DoD, and DOE staff.
Chapters 1,2, and 3 also contain performance and operating data on the 14 remedial, 19 removal, and 7 non-Superfund innovative
projects that have been completed.
vi
-------
Intentionally Blank Page
-------
CONTENTS
Notice
Document Request Form
Foreword
Acknowledgements
Abstract
List of Figures
List of Tables
List of Abbreviations
OVERVIEW
Introduction
What are Alternative and Innovative Treatment Technologies?
Sources of Information for this Report
Definitions for Specific Innovative Treatment Technologies
CHAPTER 1: SUPERFUND REMEDIAL ACTIONS
Frequency of Technology Selection
Status of Innovative Technology Implementation
Contaminants of Addressed by Innovative Treatment Technologies
Quantity of Soil Addressed
Treatment Trains
CHAPTER 2: SUPERFUND REMOVAL ACTIONS
Frequency of Technology Selection
Status of Innovative Technology Implementation
Contaminants Addressed by Innovative Treatment Technologies
Treatment Trains
CHAPTER 3: ACTIONS UNDER OTHER FEDERAL PROGRAMS
Appendix A: Summary of Status Report Updates, Changes, and Deletions
vii
Page
ii
iii
iv
v
vi
viii
ix
x
OV-1
OV-1
OV-1
OV-2
1-1
1-1
1-6
1-6
1-6
1-7
2-1
2-1
2-2
2-3
2-3
3-1
A-l
-------
LIST OF FIGURES
Number Page
1-1 Superfund Remedial Actions: RODs Signed by Fiscal Year 1-1
1-2 Superfund Remedial Actions: Source Control RODs by Fiscal Year 1-1
1-3 Superfund Remedial Actions: Overview of Source Control RODs Through Fiscal Year 1992 1-2
1-4 Superfund Remedial Actions: Treatment and Disposal Decisions for Source Control 1-2
1-5 Superfund Remedial Actions: Summary of Alternative Treatment Technologies Selected
Through Fiscal Year 1992 1-3
1-6 Superfund Remedial Actions: Number of Established Versus Innovative Treatment Technologies 1-4
1-7 Superfund Remedial Actions: Number of Innovative Treatment Technologies Versus 1-4
Corresponding RODs
1-8 Superfund Remedial Actions: Innovative Treatment Technologies by Year 1-5
1-9 Superfund Remedial Actions: Trends in the Selection of Four Innovative Treatment Technologies 1-5
1-10 Superfund Remedial Actions: Project Status of Innovative Treatment Technologies as of June 1993 1-6
1-11 Superfund Remedial Actions: Application of Innovative Treatment Technologies 1-6
1-12 Superfund Remedial Actions: Quantities of Soil to be Treated by Innovative Technologies 1-7
1-13 Superfund Remedial Actions: Treatment Trains with Innovative Treatment Technologies 1-7
2-1 Superfund Removal Actions: Summary of Innovative Technologies Selected/Used as of June 1993 2-1
2-2 Superfund Removal Actions: Project Status of Innovative Treatment Technologies as of June 1993 2-2
2-3 Superfund Removal Actions: Application of Innovative Treatment Technologies 2-3
3-1 Sample of Projects Under Other Federal Programs: Status of Innovative Treatment Technologies 3-1
as of June 1993
viii
-------
LIST OF TABLES
Number Page
1-1 Superfund Remedial Actions: Site-Specific Information by Innovative Treatment Technology 1-8
1-2 Superfund Remedial Actions: Innovative Treatment Technologies by EPA Region 1-67
1-3 Superfund Remedial Actions: Project Status by Innovative Treatment Technology 1-73
1-4 Superfund Remedial Actions: Established Treatment Technologies by Fiscal Year 1-79
1-5 Superfund Remedial Actions: Treatment Trains with Innovative Treatment Technologies 1-86
1-6 Superfund Remedial Actions: Performance Data on Completed Projects 1-88
2-1 Superfund Removal Actions: Site-Specific Information by Innovative Treatment Technology 2-4
2-2 Superfund Removal Actions: Innovative Treatment Technologies by EPA Region 2-17
2-3 Superfund Removal Actions: Project Status by Innovative Treatment Technology 2-19
2-4 Superfund Removal Actions: Treatment Trains with Innovative Treatment Technologies 2-21
2-5 Superfund Removal Actions: Performance Data on Completed Projects 2-23
3-1 Other Federal Programs: Site-Specific Information by Innovative Treatment Technology 3-2
3-2 Other Federal Programs: Innovative Treatment Technologies By EPA Region 3-12
3-3 Other Federal Programs: Project Status by Innovative Treatment Technology 3-14
3-4 Other Federal Programs: Performance Data on Completed Projects 3-16
ix
-------
LIST OF ABREVIATIONS
AM
Action Memorandum
NPL
National Priorities List
APC
Air pollution control
OERR
Office of Emergency and Remedial Response
APEG
Alkaline metal hydroxide/polyethylene glycol
OSC
On-scene coordinator
ARCS
Alternative remedial contracts strategy
OSWER
Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response
ATTIC
Alternative Treatment Technology Information
OU
Operable unit
Center
PAH
Polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbon
BCD
Base catalyzed dechlorination
PCB
Polychlorinated biphenyl
BTEX
Benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, and xylene
PCE
Perchloroethylene (tetrachloroethylene)
BTX
Benzene, toluene, and xylene
PCP
Pentachlorophenol
cy
Cubic yards
PRP
Potentially responsible party
DCA
Dichloroethane
RA
Remedial action
DCE
Dichloroethylene
RCRA
Resource Conservation and Recovery Act
DEHP
Di(2-ethylhexyl phthalate)
RD
Remedial design
DLA
Defense Logistics Agency
ROD
Record of Decision
DNT
Dinitrotoluene
RPM
Remedial project manager
EECA
Engineering Evaluation/Cost Analysis
RSKERL Robert S. Kerr Environmental Research Laboratory,
ESD
Explanation of significant differences
Ada, Oklahoma (EPA)
FAA
Federal Aviation Administration
SARA
Superfund Amendment and Reauthorization Act
ft
Feet
of 1986
FUDS
Formerly used defense sites
SACM
Superfund Accelerated Cleanup Model
FY
Fiscal year
SVOC
Semivolatile organic compound
gW
Ground water
SIS
Solidification and stabilization
ERP
Installation Restoration Program
TCA
Trichloroethane
KPEG
Potassium hydroxide/polyethylene glycol
TCE
Trichloroethylene
MEK
Methyl ethyl ketone
TIO
Technology Innovation Office
MBOCA
4,4* -Methylenebis(2-chloroaniline)
USACE
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
NAPL
Nonaqueous phase liquids
USDA
U.S. Department of Agriculture
NFEC
Navy Facilities Engineering Command
VOC
Volatile organic compound
X
-------
OVERVIEW
Introduction
The Technology Innovation Office (TIO) of the U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency's (EPA) Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
Response (OSWER) has prepared this Innovative Treatment
Technologies: Annual Status Reporno document the use of innovative
treatment technologies to remediate both Superfund and non-
Superfund sites. The report contains site-specific information on
Superfund sites (both remedial and removal actions) and non-
Superfund sites (sites addressed under other federal programs) at
which innovative treatment technologies are being used. Site managers
can use this report in evaluating cleanup alternatives. Innovative
technology vendors can use it in identifying potential markets. TIO
also uses the information to track progress in the application of
innovative treatment technologies.
The report is now updated annually. This September 1993 issue of
the report updates and expands information provided in the October
1992report. Information added to this update includes 59 innovative
treatment technologies selected for remedial actions in fiscal year
(FY) 1992 Superfund records of decision (ROD)—a ROD is the
decision document used to specify the way a site, or part of a site, will
be remediated—and information on 3 other completed projects. The
report also includes 15 additional innovative treatment technologies
selected for removal actions and 6 additional applications under
other federal programs.
What Are Alternative and Innovative Treatment Technologies?
Alternative treatment technologies are alternatives to land disposal.
The most frequently used alternative technologies are incineration
and solidification/stabilization. Innovative treatment technologies
are alternative treatment technologies for which applications at
Superfund and similar sites are inhibited by lack of dataon performance
and cost. In general, a treatment technology is considered innovative
if it has had limited full-scale application. Often, it is the application
of a technology or process to soils, sediments, sludge, and solid-
matrix waste (such as mining slag) that is innovative. Groundwater
treatment after the water has been pumped to the surface often
resembles traditional water treatment technologies; thus, in general,
pump-and-treat or ex situ groundwater remedies are considered
established. In situ bioremediation and other in situ treatment of
groundwater, however, are considered innovative technologies.
This report documents the use of the following innovative treatment
technologies to treat soils, sediments, sludge, and solid-matrix waste:
• Bioremediation (Ex Situ)
• Solvent extraction
• Bioremediation (In Situ)
• Thermal desorption
~ Chemical treatment
• Other technologies
• Dechlorination
(e.g., air sparging,
• In situ flushing
contained recovery of
• In situ vitrification
oily wastes, limestone
~ Soil vapor extraction
barriers, and fuming
* Soil washing
gasification)
In addition, the 12 remedial sites that are using in-situ bioremediation
for groundwater remediation are included with the in situ
bioremediation projects.
Sources of Information for This Report
EPA initially used RODs from individual sites to compile information
on remedial actions and pollution reports, on-scene coordinators'
reports, and the OSWER Removal Tracking System to compile data
OV-1
-------
on emergency response actions. The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Hazardous, Toxic, Radioactive Waste (HTRW) Mandatory Center
of Expertise (Omaha, Nebraska) and the Synopses of Federal
DemonstrationsoflnnovativeSiteRemediationTechnologies,Second
Edition (EPA/542/B-40/003) were consulted to compile information
on projects under other federal programs. EPA then verified and
updated the draft information through interviews with remedial
project managers (RPM) and on-scene coordinators (OSC) and other
contacts for each site. The data concerning project status do not
duplicate data in CERCLIS, EPA's Superfund tracking system. This
report provides more detailed information specifically on the portion
of the remedy pertaining to an innovative technology. In addition,
information about technologies and sites identified here might differ
from information found in the ROD annual reports and the RODs
database. These differences are the result of design changes in the
treatment trains used at sites that may or may not require official
documentation (that is, a ROD amendment or an explanation of
significant differences (ESD)).
Definitions of Specific Innovative Treatment Technologies
The innovative treatment technologies reported in the following
chapters treat hazardous wastes in very different ways. The following
paragraphs define the technologies as they are represented in this
document and provide summary statistics on some of the technologies.
EX SITU BIOREMEDIATION uses microorganisms to degrade
organic contaminants on excavated soil, sludge, and solids. The
microorganisms break down the contaminants by using them as a
food source. The end products are typically C02 and H20. Ex situ
bioremediation includes slurry-phase bioremediation, in which the
soils are mixed in water to form a slurry, and solid phase
bioremediation, in which the soils are placed in a tank or building and
tilled with water, and nutrients. Variations of the latter process are
called land farming or composting.
OV
In applications of IN SITU BIOREMEDIATION, nutrients and an
oxygen source are pumped under pressure into the soil or aquifer
through wells, or they are spread on the surface for infiltration to the
contaminated material.
In CHEMICAL TREATMENT the contaminants are converted to
less hazardous compounds through chemical reactions. The
technology is most often used to reduce a contaminant (hexavalent
chromium to the trivalent form) or oxidize a contaminant (cyanide,
for example). Neutralization is considered an available technology
and is not included in this report.
DECHLORINATION (another type of chemical treatment) results
in the removal or replacement of chlorine atoms bonded to hazardous
compounds.
For IN SITU FLUSHING, large volumes of water, at times
supplemented with treatment compounds, are introduced to soil,
waste, or groundwater to flush hazardous contaminants from a site.
This technology is predicated on the assumption that the injected
water can be isolated effectively within the aquifer and recovered.
IN SITU VITRIFICATION treats contaminated soil in place at
temperatures of approximately 300G*F (1600°C). Metals are
encapsulated in the glass-like structure of the melted silicate
compounds. Organics may be treated by combustion.
SOIL WASHING is used for two purposes. First, the mechanical
action and water (sometimes with additives) physically remove the
contaminants from the soil particles. Second, agitation of the soil
particles allows the smaller diameter, more highly contaminated
fines to separate from the larger soil particles, thus reducing the
volume of material requiring further treatment.
-------
SOLVENT EXTRACTION operates on the principle that organic
contaminants can be solubilized preferentially and removed from the
waste in the correct solvent. The solvent used will vary, depending
on the waste to be treated.
For THERMAL DESORPTION, the waste is heated in a controlled
environment to cause organic compounds to volatilize from the
waste. The operating temperature for thermal desorption is usually
less than 1000°F (550*C). The volatilized contaminants usually
require further control or treatment.
SOIL VAPOR EXTRACTION removes volatile organic constituents
from the soil in place through the use of vapor extraction wells,
sometimes combined with air injection wells, to strip and flush the
contaminants into the air stream for further treatment.
OTHER TECHNOLOGIES include air sparging and the contained
recovery of oily wastes (CROW), limestone barriers, and fuming
gasification technologies. Air sparging involves injecting air into the
aquifer to strip or flush volatile contaminants as the air percolates up
through the groundwater and is captured by a vapor extraction
system. The CROW process displaces oil wastes with steam and hot
water. The contaminated oils and groundwater are swept into a more
permeable area and are pumped out of the aquifer. Limestone
barriers act like chemical slurry walls. Contaminated groundwater
comes into contact with the barrier and pH increases. The increase in
pH effectively immobilizes dissolved metals and neutralizes the soil.
Fuming gasification is a thermal treatment process that purges
contaminants from solids and soils as metal fumes and organic
vapors. The organic vapors can be burned as fuel and the metal fumes
can be recovered and recycled.
The following chapters contain detailed information and analysis on
sites at which innovative treatment technologies are being or have
been applied. Chapter 1 covers all Superfund sites implementing an
innovative treatment technology under a remedial action. These
actions are usually documented in a ROD. Chapter 2 provides
information on Superfund removal action sites. Removals are
conducted in response to an immediate threat caused by a release of
hazardous substances.* Chapter 3 covers non-Superfund sites or
sites being addressed under other federal programs.
* Historically, remedial and removal actions operate under different procedural guidelines. The EPA currently is revising the Superfund process under the Superfund
Accelerated Cleanup Model (SACM). Under SACM, EPA will adopt a continuous process for assessing site specific condtions and the need for action. Risks will be
reduced quickly through early remedial or removal action.
OV-3
-------
Chapter 1
Superfund Remedial Actions
-------
THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
-------
SUPERFUND REMEDIAL ACTIONS
Frequency of Technology Selection
ROD Statistics As of September 30,1992, EPA has listed 1,275 sites
on the National Priorities List (NPL). Through Fiscal Year (FY) 1992
ending September 30, 1992, 1,117 RODs (including ROD
Amendments) had been signed. Most RODs for remedial actions
address the source of contamination, such as soil, sludge, sediments,
solid-type wastes, and nonaqueous phase liquids (NAPL). These
RODs are referred to as "source control" RODs. Other RODs address
ground water only or specify that no action is necessary. Figure 1-1
shows the number of source control RODs compared with the total
number of RODs for each fiscal year.
FIGURE 1-1
SUPERFUND REMEDIAL ACTIONS: RODS SIGNED
BY FISCAL YEAR
{Total Number of RODs = 1.117)
82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92
Fiscal Year
The difference between the total number of RODs and the number of source control
RODs is the number of "groundwater remedy only1 or'no action needed' RODs.
Source: USEPA Office of Emergency and Remedial Response.
An analysis of source control RODs allows acomparison of the frequency
of selection of treatment with that of selection of containment or disposal
to remedy contamination at sites. Source control RODs are classified by
the general type of technology selected: (1) RODs specifying some
alternative treatment, (2) RODs specifying containment or disposal only,
and (3) RODs specifying other action (such as land use restrictions,
monitoring, or relocation). Figure 1-2 shows the number of source
control RODs that fall under each category. RODs in which some
treatment is selected may include containment of treatment residuals or
of waste from another part of the site.
FIGURE 1-2
SUPERFUND REMEDIAL ACTIONS: SOURCE
CONTROL RODS BY FISCAL YEAR
180—/
I I Treataient
gg Containment, Disposal Only
¦ Other (Institutional Controls,
Monitoring, Relocation)
Number 100
Fiscal Year
Source: USEPA Office of Emergency and Remedial Response,
1-1
-------
Overall, 63 percent of source control RODs have selected at least one
treatment technology for source control (Figure 1-3). The Superfund
Amendments and Reauthorization Act of 1986 (SARA) required that
EPA favor permanent remedies (that is, alternative treatment) over
containment or disposal to remediate Superfund sites. In each year
following the passage of SARA, more than 70 percent of the RODs
contain provisions for the treatment of wastes. The increase is most
FIGURE 1-3
SUPERFUND REMEDIAL ACTIONS: OVERVIEW OF
SOURCE CONTROL RODS THROUGH FISCAL YEAR 1992
Some Treatment
(504)63%
Containment or Disposal Only
(276) 35%
* Includes Institutional controls, monitoring, arid relocation.
() Number of RODs
Source: USEPA Office of Emergency and Remedial Response.
dramatic in FY1988. Fifty percent of RODs in FY 1987 selected some
treatment for source control, whereas 69 percent of RODs in FY 1988
selected some treatment (Figure 1-4). The percentage was 72 percent
in FY 1992. Figure 1-4 also illustrates the percentage of RODs
selecting at least one innovative technology, as updated by current
project status information. Out of a total of795 source control RODs
signed through FY 1992, innovative technologies were selected and
are still being considered or used for approximately 27 percent of
source control RODs. Overall, 19 percent of all RODs have included
innovative technologies.
FIGURE 1-4
SUPERFUND REMEDIAL ACTIONS: TREATMENT
AND DISPOSAL DECISIONS FOR SOURCE CONTROL
100-
too*
I I 1
-»• Containmsnt or Disposal Only
Some Treatment
i * Soma Innovative Trealmant
Percent of ..
Source bu
Control
Records of
Decision 40
82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91
Fiscal Year
Source: USEPA Office of Emergency and Remedial Response
Technology Statistics Another way of illustrating the greater use of
treatment is by quantifying the number and kinds of treatment
technologies selected and used. Most of the remainder of the
information contained in this chapter focuses on technologies, rather
than RODs. In each ROD in which treatment was specified, several
alternative treatment technologies may have been selected.
Through FY 1992,586 treatment technologies have been selected in
504 source control RODs specifying some treatment In addition,
EPA has selected in situ bioremediation of ground water for 11
remedial sites for a total 597 treatment technologies. EPA selected in
-------
situ bioremediation of groundwater for four remedial sites in FY
1992. The selection of multiple technologies results from the use of
treatment trains or from the treatment of different wastes or areas of
the site. For the 504 RODs specifying treatment for source control,
Figure 1-5 lists each type of treatment technology selected and how often
it has been selected or used for source control. Figure 1-5 illustrates that,
through FY 1992,44 percent of the 598 treatment technologies selected
were innovative and 56 percent were established. Tables 1-1,1-2, and
1-3, appearing at the end of this section, contain summary information on
the innovative treatment technology projects at remedial sites. Table 1-4
lists sites using established technologies. Information on the established
treatment technologies is based on a review by the Office of Emergency
and Remedial Response (OERR) rather than interviews of Regional or
State staff.
FIGURE 1-5
SUPERFUND REMEDIAL ACTIONS: SUMMARY OF ALTERNATIVE TREATMENT TECHNOLOGIES
SELECTED THROUGH FISCAL YEAR 1992
(Total Number of Technologies = 598)
Innovative Technologies (263) 44%
Established Technologies (335) 56%
Off-Site Incineration v
(92) 15% \
On-Site Incineration
(68) 11%
Soil Washing (20) 3%
~~~~~~~~~~
~~~~~~~~~~
~~~~~~~~~~
~~~~~~~~~~
~~~~~~~~~
~~~~~~~~
~~~~~~
Solvent Extraction (5) <1%
Ex Situ Bioremediation (34) 6%
In Situ Bioremediation * (26) 4%
In Situ Rushing (20) 3%
Solidification/Stabilization
(165)28%
— Soil Vapor Extraction
(107) 18%
Dechlorination (5) < 1%
— In Situ Vitrification (3) <1%
Thermal Desorption (32) 5%
Other Innovative* (8) 1%
Other Established* (10) 2%
Note: Data are derived from 1982-1992 Records of Decision (RODs) for fiscal years and anticipated design and construction activities as of June 1993. More than one technology per site
may be used.
(} Number of times this technology was selected or used.
"Other" established technologies are soil aeration, in situ flaming, and chemical neutralization. "Other" innovative technologies are air sparging, contained recovery of oily wastes,
limestone barriers, and fuming gasification.
# Includes 11 in situ groundwater treatment remedies.
1-3
-------
Figure 1-6 compares the numbers of established and innovative
technologies by fiscal year. The figure indicates thatmoreinnovative
technologies than established technologies have been selected in
RODs in the previous two years (FY 1991 and FY 1992), Figure
1-7 compares the number of innovative technologies selected with
the number of sites. This graph illustrates that some sites are using
more than one innovative technology, often together in "treatment
FIGURE 1-6
SUPERFUND REMEDIAL ACTIONS: NUMBER OF
ESTABLISHED VERSUS INNOVATIVE TREATMENT
TECHNOLOGIES
Number of
Treatment
Technologies
Selected
70-
60'
50'
40'
30'
20'
10'
0'
¦ Estabfched Technologies
' InnoraUve Technologies
u5»
kM
82 83 84 85 86 87 88
Fiscal Year
89 90 91 92
Nolo; Dam for innovative technologies are derived from Records of Decision
(RODs) for fiscal years 1382-1992 and anticipated design and construction
activities as of June 1993. Mors than one technology per site may be used.
trains." The figure also indicates that the ratio of innovative
technologies to sites has increased every year since FY 1986. Figure
1-8 gives the frequency of selection for each innovative technology
by fiscal year. Figure 1-9 shows the frequency of selection for the
four most frequently selected innovative treatment technologies,
including soil vapor extraction by fiscal year.
FIGURE 1-7
SUPERFUND REMEDIAL ACTIONS: NUMBER OF
INNOVATIVE TREATMENT TECHNOLOGIES
VERSUS CORRESPONDING RODS
70-
60-
50-
Number of
Treatment 40-
Technologies
or 30-
RODs
20-
10-
0-
Total Technologies=263
Total RODs a 217
1 i
RODS
Technologies
84 85
86
87
88 88
Fiscal Yew
90 91
92
Note: Data derived from 1982-1992 Records of Decision (ROD, p and anticipated design and
construction activities as of June 1993. Number of RODs in a fiscal year usually equals
the number of sites.
1-4
-------
FIGURE 1-8
SUPERFUND REMEDIAL ACTIONS: INNOVATIVE TREATMENT TECHNOLOGIES BY YEAR
Fiscal Year
1984
1985
1986
1987
1988
1989
1990
1991
1992
TOTAL
Soil Vapor Extraction
0
2
1
1
10
19
19
34
20
107
aflEESBfflB?
wm
m
til
DP
fs m
£¦?>.
WuL \
-
WWn
Thermal Desorption
0
1
2
3
4
2
6
11
4
32
f&£8
Hff
T**"
SKfta
S£££
S3
Spsr*
mm
UM
Wm
Soil Washing
0
0
0
0
5
3
6
2
4
20
Hi
mm
HI
IS!
111
B8S
m
ra
^111
Other
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
3
4
8
WMr.
Hil
£§s
WWi
18585
ISS
©ft&si
m?:
BE®?
Solvent Extraction
0
0
0
0
0
4
0
t
0
5
Sf«n.ar-a» i
SSI
SH
SI?
mi
teter.-«s-
i "a»«.. m ¦;
mm
Vitrification
0
D
0
0
0
1
1
1
0
3
:v4&-f
/."«&<
?
:/59" ;
NOTE Data derived from Fiscal Year 1982 -1992 Records of Decision (RODs) and anticipated design and construction activities as of June 1993
FIGURE 1-9
SUPERFUND REMEDIAL ACTIONS: TRENDS IN THE SELECTION OF FOUR INNOVATIVE TREATMENT TECHNOLOGIES
Number of
Times
Selected
-a- Soil Vapor Extraction
Biorcmcdiation*
TTiennal Desoiption
Soil Washing
87 88 89
Fiscal Year
* Also includes in situ groundwater treatment.
NOTE: Data derived from Fiscal Year 1982 - 1X2 Records of Decision (RODs) and anticipated design and construction activities as of June 1993
1-5
-------
Status of Innovative Technology Implementation
Many of the innovative technologies documented in this report have
been selected in the last several years. The design of such projects
typically takes one to three years; therefore, relatively few innovative
technologies have been contracted for and installed, and even fewer
have been completed (Figure 1-10). In the next several years, though,
many projects now in design should become operational. Table 1-3
summarizes remedial action sites using innovative treatment
technologies by status and specific technology. Table 1-6 presents
detailed information on remedial projects that have been completed.
FIGURE 1-10
SUPERFUND REMEDIAL ACTIONS: PROJECT
STATUS OF INNOVATIVE TREATMENT
TECHNOLOGIES AS OF JUNE 1993
Technology
Predeslgn/
In Design
Design Complete/
Being Installed/
Operational
Project
Completed
Total
Soil Vapor Extractor!
69
32
6
107
Ex Situ Bioremediatiorj
22
11
1
34
Thermal Desorption
20
8
4
32
In Situ Bioramediatton*
18
9
1
26
Soil Washing
17
3
0
20
In Situ Rushing
16
4
0
20
Dechlorination
3
1
1
5
Solvent Extraction
S
0
0
5
In Situ Vitrification
3
0
0
3
Chemical Treatment
7
1
0
3
Other InrtovativeTreatment 2
0
1
8
TOTAL
180(69%)
69(26%)
14 (5%)
263
Note: Data are derived from 1982 -1992 Records of Decision (RODs) and anticipated
design and construction activities as of June 1993.
0 Also includes in situ groundwater treatment
Contaminants Addressed by Innovative Treatment Technologies
The data collected for this report form the basis for an analysis of the
classes of contaminants treated by each technology type at remedial
action sites. Figure 1-11 provides this information, by technology, for
three majorcontaminant groups: volatile organic compounds (VOC),
semivolatile organic compounds (S VOC), and metals. For this report,
compounds are categorized as VOCs or S VOCs, according to the lists
providedinEPA's SW-846Test Methods8240and 8270, respectively.
FIGURE 1-11
SUPERFUND REMEDIAL ACTIONS: APPLICATION
OF INNOVATIVE TREATMENT TECHNOLOGIES
99
¦¦ VOCs
E3 SVOCs
CO Mauls
Number
of
Application*
Soil Vapor Thermal Bio- In Situ Solvent Soil
Extraction DtsorpWon ram*4Mon FluaWnfl Extraction Wuitlng
Innovative Technology
Quantity of Soil Addressed
EPA analyzed the quantity of soil treated at 183 sites using innovative
treatment technologies, and for which quantity data were available
(Figure 1-12). This analysis provides an indication of the scale of the
projects involved.
1-6
-------
Treatment Trains
Innovative treatment technologies in this report may be used with
established or other innovative treatment technologies in treatment trains.
Technologies may be combined to reduce the volume of material
iequiringfurthertreatoent,topreventtheemissionofvolatilecontaminants
during excavation and mixing, or to address multiple contaminants in a
single medium. Figure 1-13 presents the data on treatment trains
contained within this report Table 1-5 lists the sites at which treatment
trains are being used.
FIGURE 1-12
SUPERFUND REMEDIAL ACTIONS: QUANTITIES OF SOIL TO BE TREATED BY INNOVATIVE TECHNOLOGIES
NumberOfSites With Data
s-fr" b.
1 (With^irt^pata)!;'
^;":;;^Rarige _
v Average
Total
In Situ Flushing
12 (20)
130 - 650,OCX)
86,000
1,035,330
Soil vapor extraction
75(107)
62 - 2,000,000
76,000
5,729,315
Bioremediation (in situ)
10(26)
5,000 - 258,000
72,000
720,900
Soil washing
18 (20)
1,800-200,000
38,000
686,900
Sovent extraction
5(5)
15,000 - 67,000
32,500
162,500
Bioremediation (ex situ)
27(34)
1,000-120,000
30,000
810,695
Thermal desorption
27 (32)
2,000-130,000
24,000
650,900
Dechlorination
3(5)
16,000 - 49,000
22,000
65,000
Vitrification
3(3)
3,600 - 5,000
4,400
13,200
Chemical treatment
2(3)
800-12,700
400
800
Other
1(8)
200 - 200
200
200
TOTAL
183 (263)
-
9,800,470
1-7
-------
FIGURE 1-13
SUPERFUND REMEDIAL ACTIONS: TREATMENT TRAINS WITH INNOVATIVE TREATMENT TECHNOLOGIES
TOTAL TREATMENT TRAINS = 38
Solidification/
Stabilization
1 site)
Bloremediation (7 sites)
Incineration (3 sites)
Fotowed
Dechlorination
(3 sites)
Incineration (5 sites)
S/S (5 sites)
Foaowod
In Situ . _ _
Bloremediation ,n situ Flushing
^sitel (2 sites)
FoOowed
S/S Soil Washing
(1 site) (1 site)
Soli Washing
(1 site)
FoBowed
Bp
Solidification/
Stabilization
(1 site)
Soil Washing
(1 site)
Incineration
(1 site)
VH9U
FoOowed
Solidification/Stabilization
(3 sites)
In Situ
Bloremediation
(2 sites)
FoBowed
1-8
-------
TABLE 1-1
REMEDIAL ACTIONS; SITE-SPECIFIC INFORMATION BY INNOVATIVE TREATMENT TECHNOLOGY
Table 1-1 is the principal part of this chapter. It contains the most detailed, site-specific information for remedial sites for which an
innovative treatment has been selected. The columns of Table 1-1 present the following information:
Region
This column indicates the EPA Region in which the site is located.
Site Name, State, ROD Date
This column identifies the site and the operable unit for which an innovative treatment technology was selected.
A Record of Decision (ROD) documents the selection of remedy in the remedial program. The date shown in this column is the date
on which a ROD was signed by an EPA official.
An asterisk (*) in this column indicates that a treatability study has been completed for this technology at the particular site.
Specific Technology
The second column describes the specific technology selected within a general category of innovative treatment. For example, within
the general category of bioremediation, the specific technologies of land treatment or slurry-phase bioremediation may be chosen.
Site Description
This column provides information on the industrial source of the contamination at the site and allows analysis of the selection of
innovative technologies by site type. For example, by using the information in this column, one may determine the most frequently
selected innovative technology for wood preserving sites.
Media (quantity)
This column provides information on the media and quantity of material to be treated. If a treatment is used in situ, an effort has been
made to include the maximum depth of the treatment to provide the reader with another parameter significant to the application.
1-9
-------
TABLE 1-1 (Continued)
Key Contaminants Treated
The major contaminants or contaminant groups targeted by the treatment technology are shown in this column. Other contaminants may
also be listed that may be treated. Other contaminants that may be present, but that are not to be addressed by the listed technology, are
not included.
Status
This column indicates the status of the application of the innovative treatment technology. Predesign indicates that the ROD has been
signed but design has not begun. During predesign, EPA may be negotiating with the potentially responsible parties, procuring the
services of a design firm, or collecting information (such as conducting a treatability study) needed in die design stage. If a project is
in design, the engineering documents needed to contract for and build the remedy are being prepared. If a remedy is being installed, the
lead agency has signed a contract for the construction work needed to set up the remedy. The remedy is operational if it is completely
installed and it is now being operated as a treatment system; the remedy is completed if the goals of the ROD or decision document for
that treatment technology have been met and treatment has ceased.
One purpose of this column is to identify opportunities for vendors to become involved in the next phase of the project. Whenever possible,
the season and year in which the current phase will end is given. The information is identified as the "completion planned" date.
Lead Agency, Treatment Contractor
The "lead" indicates whether federal dollars are to be used to implement the remedy (Fund lead) or the potentially responsible parties
will conduct the remedy with oversight by EPA or the State (PRP lead). If a remedy is Fund lead, EPA may manage the design/construction
through its contractors, the state may manage the project with Superfund dollars, or the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (US ACE) may
act for EPA to manage the design or construction. No matter what agency or organization is responsible for managing the remedy, the
contractor responsible for the actual installation and operation of the innovative technology also is identified, if the lead organization has
selected a contractor.
Contacts/Phone
This final column provides the names and telephone numbers of useful contacts for the site or technology. The first name listed is usually
the EPA remedial project manager (RPM) responsible for the site. If a remedy is being managed by the state, the name and phone number
of the state RPM also is provided. Information on other useful contacts may also be provided.
1-10
-------
i auic i - i
Remedial Actions: Site-Specific Information By Innovative Treatment Technology
June 199;
Bioremediation (Ex situ)
Region
Site Name, State,
(ROD Date)
Specific
Technology
Site Description
Media (Quantity)
Key Contaminants
Treated
Status#
Lead Agency
and Treatment
Contractor (if
available)
Contacts/Phone
1
Iron Horse Park*, HA
(09/15/88)
Land treatment
Industrial and
railyard waste
Sludge (25,000
cy)
VOCs, PAHs
Operational;
Completion
planned
Summer 1995
PRP
lead/Federal
oversight; EHSR
Consulting
Don McElroy
617-223-5571
2
General Motors/Central
Foundry Division, OU
1, NY (12/17/90)
Sturry phase
Machine shops,
Engine casting
facility
Soil (100,000
cy), Sludge
(91,000 cy),
Sediments (62,000
cy)
PCBs
Predesign; PD
Completion
planned
Summer 1994
PRP
lead/Federal
oversight
Lisa Carson
212-264-6857
2
General Motors/Central
Foundry Division, OU
2, MY (03/31/92)
Slurry phase
Aluminum casting
plant
Soil (59,000 cy)
PCBs
Predesign; PD
Completion
planned
Summer 1994;
Final
technology
selection
will take
place after
treatability
study is
complete in
12/93
PRP
lead/Federal
oversight
Lisa Carson
212-264-6857
3
Whitmoyer
Laboratories, OU 3, PA
(12/31/90)
Bioremediation
{Ex Situ) To be
used with iron
based fixation
Other organic
chemical
manufacturing
Soil (5,600 cy),
Sediments
(quantity
unknown)
VOCs (TCE), SVOCs
(Aniline)
In design;
Design
completion
planned Fall
1995
PRP
lead/Federal
oversight;
Envi ron
Chris Corbett
215-597-8186
3
L.A. Clarke & Sons,
lagoon Sludge OU, VA
(03/31/88)
Slurry phase in
tanks
Wood preserving
Sludge (278 cy)
PAHs (Creosote)
In design;
Design
completion
planned
Winter 1993
PRP
lead/Federal
oversight; ICF
Kaiser
Andy Palestini
215-597-1286
Status as of June 1993. See Table 1-6 for performance and operational data on completed remedial projects.
Indicates that a treatability study has been completed.
Contacts listed are EPA regional staff unless otherwise noted. 1-11
-------
Table 1-1
Remedial Actions: Site-specific Information By Innovative Treatment Technology Through FY 1992 June 1993
Bioremediation (Ex situ) (continued!
Region
Site Heme, State,
(ROD Date)
Specific
Technology
Site Description
Media (Qumtity)
Key Contaminants
Treated
Status#
Lead Agency
and Treatment
Contractor (if
available)
Contacts/Phone
3
Ordnance Works
Disposal Areas, WV
(09/29/89)
land treatment
other organic
chemical
manufacturing,
other inorganic
chemical
manufacturing
Soil (13,500 cy)
PAHs
(Carcinogenic
PAHs)
Predesign; PD
Completion
planned Fall
1993
PRP
lead/Federal
oversight; ABB
Environmental
Melissa
Whittington
215-597-1286
4
Broun Wood
Preserving*, FL
(04/08/88)
Land treatment
Wood preserving,
Drix* storage/
disposal
Soil (7,500 cy)
PAHs (Creosote)
Completed;
Operational
from 10/88 to
12/91
PRP
lead/Federal
oversight;
Remediation
Technology,
Inc.
Martha Berry
404-347-2643
4
Cabot Carbon/Koppers,
FL (09/27/90)
See also
Bioremediation (In
Situ), Soil Washing
Slurry phase
(preceded by
soil Mashing)
Wood preserving,
Pine tar and
turpentine
manufacturing
Soil (quantity
unknown)
SVOCs (PCP), PAHs
In design;
Design
completion
planned Fall
1994
PRP
lead/Federal
oversight
McLaren-Hart
Martha Berry
404-347-2643
4
Dubose Oil Products*,
FL (03/29/90)
Solid phase
Windrowing with
aeration and
irrigation in a
barn
Petroleum refining
and reuse
Soil (20,000 cy)
VOCs (TCE, DCE,
Benzenes,
Xylenes), SVOCs
(PCP), PAHs
Being
installed;
Installation
completion
planned
Slimier 1993;
Pilot scale
work to begin
in Sept.
1993. This
will be Phase
1 of RA.
PRP
lead/Federal
oversight;
Watech
Hark Fite
404-347-2643
George tinder
(FL)
904-488-0190
4
Whitehouse Waste Oil
Pits (amended ROD)*,
FL (06/16/92)
See also Soil Washing
Slurry phase
(preceeded by
soil washing)
Waste oil recycler
Soil/Sludge
56,930 cy
Combined
VOCs, PCBs, PAHs
BTEX
In design;
Design
completion
planned
Winter 1993
Federal
lead/Fund
Financed
Tony Best
404-347-2643
1-12
-------
June 1995
Region
Site Name, State,
(ROD Date)
Specific
Technology
Site Description
Media (Quantity)
Key Contaminants
Treated
Status#
Lead Agency
and Treatment
Contractor (if
available)
Contacts/Phone
4
Benfield Industries,
NC (07/31/92)
See also
Bioremediation (In
Situ), Soil Washing
Slurry phase
preceeded by
soil Mashing
Bulk chemical
mixing and
repackaging plant.
Soil/Slurry
(4,600 cy
combined)
VOCs, SVOCs
Predesign
Federal
lead/Fund
Financed; COM,
F.I.P.
Corporation
John Bornholm
404-347-7791
4
Cape Fear Hood
Preserving, NC
(06/30/89)
See also Soil Washing
Slurry phase may
be followed by
s/s
Wood preserving
Soil (24,000 cy)
VOCs, PAHs
Design
completed but
not
installed;
Project on
hold due to
capacity
assurance
issue.
Federal
lead/Fund
Financed
Jon Bornholm
404-347-7791
4
Charles Macon Lagoon,
Lagoon #10, NC
(09/30/91)
Solid phase
Oil recycling and
reuse
Soil (1,000 cy)
SVOCs
(Fluoranthene),
PAHs
(Bemo(a)pyrene,
Benzo(a)
anthracene,
Chrysene)
In design;
Design
completion
planned
Summer 1994;
Currently
negotiating
with PRPs
PRP
lead/Federal
oversight; RMT
Jack Butler
919-733-2801
5
Galesburg/Koppers, IL
(06/30/89)
Land treatment
Wood preserving
Soil (15,200 cy)
SVOCs (PCP,
Phenols), PAHs
(Creosote)
Predesign; PD
Completion
planned Fall
1993
PRP lead/State
oversight;
Remediation
Technologies,
Inc.
Brad Bradley
312-886-4742
Steve Davis
(IL)
217-785-3913
5
Cliffs/Dow Dump*, MI
(09/27/89)
Bioremediation
(Ex Situ) forced
aeration
biological
treatment
Waste disposal for
charcoal
manufacturing
plant
Soil (9,500 cy)
VOCs CTCE, BTEX),
SVOCs (Phenol),
PAHs
(Naphthalene)
In design;
Design to be
completed in
Sumner 1994.
PRP
lead/Federal
oversight; ENSR
Ken Glatz
312-886-1434
1-13
-------
Table 1-1
Remedial Actions: She-specific Information By Innovative Treatment Technology Through FY 1992 June 1993
Bioremediation (Ex situ) {continued}
Region
Site Nam, State,
(ROD Date)
Specific
Technology
Site Description
Media (Quantity)
Key Contaminants
Treated
Status#
Lead Agency
and Treatment
Contractor (if
available)
Contacts/Phone
5
Burlington Northern
Railroad Tie Treating
Plant*, UN (06/04/86)-
Land treatment
Wood preserving
Soil (9,500 cy),
Sludge (9,600 cy)
SVQCs (Phenols),
PAHs
Operational;
Completion
planned 1994
PRP/State-
Federal
oversight;
Remediation
Technologies,
Inc.
Tony Rutter
312-886-8961
Fred Jenness
(MN)
612-297-8470
Richard Truax
(RETEC)
303-493-3700
5
Joslyn Manufacturing
and Supply Co., MN
Land treatment
Unlined
treatment unit
with irrigation
and tilling
Wood preserving
Soil (75,000 cy)
SVOCs (PCP), PAHs
Operational; .
Completion
planned Fall
1994
PRP lead/State
oversight; BARR
Engineering/ GL
Contracting
Inc.
Kevin Turner
312-886-4444
Ann Bidwell
(MN)
612-296-7827
5
South Andover Salvage
Yard OU 2, MN
(12/24/91)
Solid phase
Salvage yard
Soil (11,400 cy)
PAHs
Predesign
Federal
lead/Fund
Financed
Bruce
Sypniewski
312-886-6189
5
Moss-American*, HI
(09/27/90)
See also Soil Washing
Slurry phase
(preceded by
soil washing)
Wood preserving
Soil (80,000 cy),
Sediments (5,200
cy)
PAHs
Predesign; PD
Confiletion
planned 1994;
Bench-scale
study is
underway
PRP
lead/Federal
oversight;
Weston,
Inc.(prime)/IT
Corporation sub
contractor)
Bonnie Eleder
312-886-4885
6
Old Inger Oil
Refinery*, LA
(09/25/84)
Land treatment
Petroleum refining
and reuse
Soil (120,000
cy). Sludge
(quantity
unknown)
VOCs (Benzene,
Ethylbenzene),
PAHs (Petroleum
hydrocarbons).
Operational;
Completion
planned Fall
2001
State lead/Fund
Financed;
Westinghouse
Haztech
(installation).
Operation to be
awarded
Spring,1992
Paul Sieminski
214-655-6710
Mike Hahn (LA)
504-765-0487
1-14
-------
Remedial Actions: Site-specific Information By Innovative Treatment Technology Through FY 1992
Bioremediation (Ex situ) (continued)
June 1919:
Region
Site Name, State,
(ROD Date)
Specific
Technology
Site Description
Media (Quantity)
Key Contaminants
T reated
Status#
Lead Agency
and Treatment
Contractor (if
available)
Contacts/Phone
6
Prewitt Abandoned
Refinery, NM
(09/30/92)
See also Soil Vapor
Extraction, Other
Technologies
Bioremediation
(Ex Situ)
Crude oil refinery
Soil (quantity
unknown)
VOCs (BTEX), PAHs
Predesign
PRP
lead/Federal
oversight
Monica
Chapa-Smi th
214-655-6780
6
Oklahoma Refining Co.,
OK (06/09/92)
See also
Bioremediation (In
Situ)
Bioremediation
(Ex Situ)
followed by
stabilization
Petroleum refining
and reuse
Soil/Sludge
(56,000 cy)
Sediments
(quantity
unknown)
VOCs, Organics
(LNAPLs)
Predesign
State lead/Fund
F i nanced
Noel Bennett
214-655-8514
6
North Cavalcade
Street*, TX (06/28/88)
Land treatment
Wood preserving
Soil (5,500 cy)
PAHs (Creosote)
In design;
Design
completion
planned
Summer 1993
State lead/Fund
F i nanced
Glenn Celerier
214-655-8523
Stephen Chong
512-908-2441
6
Sheridan Disposal
Services*, TX
(12/29/88)
Slurry phase
Industrial
landfill
Soil (13,000 cy),
Sludge (30,000
cy)
VOCs (Benzene,
Toluene), SVOCs
(Phenols), PCBs
Predesign; PD
Completion
planned 1991;
Biotreatment
pilot study
conducted in
1991.
Awaiting
entry of
consent
decrees by
court.
PRP lead/State
oversight
Gary Baumgarten
214-655-6749
1-15
-------
Table 1-1
Remedial Actions: Site-specific Information By Innovative Treatment Technology Through FY 1992 June 199:
Bioremediation (Ex situ) {continued!
Region
Site Name, State,
(ROD Date)
Specific
Technology
Site Description
Media (Quantity)
Key Contaminants
Treated
Status#
Lead Agency
and Treatment
Contractor (if
available)
Contacts/Phone
7
Vogel Paint & Wax, IA
(09/20/89)
Land treatment
Paint/ink
formulation
Soil (10,000 cy)
VOCs (Hethyl
Ethyl Ketone,
BTK)
Operational;
Completion
planned 1997;
One cell is
constructed.
20 % of
remediation
is
acomplished.
PRP lead/State
oversight;
Vogel
Jack Generaux
913-551-7690
Bob Drustrup
(IA)
515-281-8900
8
Broderick Wood
Products 0U 2, CO
(03/24/92)
See also
Bioremediation (In
Situ)
Land treatment
Wood preserving
Soil (59,000 cy),
Sediments (120
cy)
VOCs, SVOCs
(PCP), Dioxins,
PAHs
Being
installed;
Installation
completion
planned Fall
1993;
Currently
conducting
treatability
tests
Federal
lead/Fund
Financed CHjH
Hill
Armando Saenz
303-293-1532
8
Burlington Northern
(Somers Plant)*, MT
(09/27/89)
See also
Bioremediation (In
Situ)
Land treatment
Wood preserving
Soil (40,000 cy)
PAHs (Creosote)
Operational;
Completion
planned Fall
1993;
Operations
began Spring
1993
PRP
lead/Federal
oversight;
Remediation
Technologies,
Inc.
Jim Harris
406-449-5414
8
Idaho Pole Company*,
MT (09/28/92)
See also
Bioremediation (In
Situ), In situ
Flushing
Land treatment
Wood preserving
Soil (19,000 cy),
Sediments (2,683
cy)
SVOCs (PCP), PAHs
Predesign
In negotiation
Jim Harris
406-449-5414
1
-------
Remedial Actions:
Site-specific Information By Innovative Treatment Technology Through FY 1992
Bioremediation (Ex situ) (continued)
June 1992
Region
Site Name, State,
(ROD Date)
Specific
Technology
Site Description
Media (Quantity)
Key Contaminants
Treated
Status#
Lead Agency
and Treatment
Contractor (if
available)
| Contacts/Phone
8
tibby Groundwater
Contamination*, MT
(12/30/88)
See also
Bioremediation (In
Situ)
Land treatment
using two 1-acre
cells, soil is
excavated &
mixed
Wood preserving
Soil (45,000 cy)
VOCs (Benzene),
SVOCs (PCP), PAHs
(Creosote)
Operational;
Completion
planned 1999
PRP
lead/Federal
oversight;
Woodward-Clyde
Jim Harris
406-449-5414
Bert Bledsoe
(RSKERL)
405-332-2313
8
Uasatch Chemical*, UT
(03/29/91)
See also In situ
Vitrification
Land treatment
on an asphalt
pad
Pesticide
manufacturing/use
/storage. Other
organic chemical
manufacturing,
Other inorganic
chemical
manufacturing
Soil (1,100 cy)
VOCs (Toluene,
Xylene)
Operational;
Completion
planned
Summer 1993
PRP
lead/Federal
oversight;
Harding/Lawson
Bert Garcia
303-293-1526
9
J.H. Baxter*, CA
(09/27/90)
Land treatment
to be followed
by fixation for
metals
Wood preserving
Soil (12,500 cy)
SVOCs (PCP),
Dioxins, PAHs
In design;
Design
completion
planned
September
1993
PRP
lead/Federal
oversight;
PRP-James L.
Grant & Assoc.;
Fed.- SAIC and
Sub,-CDM
Federal
Programs
Cathy Setian
415-744-2254
9
Jasco Chemical Co., CA
(09/30/92)
Bioremediation
(Ex Situ) may
combine aerobic
and anaerobic
Chemical blending
and repacking
Soil (1,095 cy)
VOCs (DCA,
Methylene
chloride,
Acetone, Xylene)
Predesigrt; PD
Completion
planned
Summer 1993
PRP
lead/Federal
oversight
Rosetnarie
Carroway
415-744-2235
10
McChord AFB Washrack
Treatment Area, AK
(09/28/92)
Bioremediation
(Ex Situ)
Federal facility
Airplane
Maintenance Area
Soil (quantity
unknown)
VOCs (Fuel
related
contaminants.
Benzene)
SVOCs
In design;
Design
completion
planned
Winter 1993;
30% of design
completed
7/93
Air Force/EPA
oversight
Marie Jennings
206-553-1173
Michael Grenko
206-984-3913
1-17
-------
Table 1-1
Remedial Actions: Site-specific Information By innovative Treatment Technology Through FY 1992 June 1992
Bioremediation (Ex situ) (continued)
Region
Site Name, State,
CROO Date)
Specific
Technology
Site Description
Media (Quantity)
Key Contaminants
Treated
Status#
Lead Agency
and Treatment
Contractor (if
available)
Contacts/Phone
10
Umatilla Array Depot
Activity, Soil
Operable Unit*, OR
(09/30/92)
Composting
Explosives washout
Soil (4,800 cy)
Explosives
(TNT,RDX,2,4,6-tr
initzotoiuene.Tri
nitrobenzene,
DNT,
Nitrobenzene,
HHX, N-tertyl)
In design;
Design
completion
planned Fall
1993;
Excavation
(Phase
I)-design
completion
Fall 1993;
Bio-design
(Phase
II)-predesign
Array lead/EPA
and state
oversight
Harry Craig
503-326-3689
Jeff Rodin
206-553-4497
Hark Dourghty
(US Army)
503-564-5294
Hike Nelson
(USACE Seattle)
206-764-3458
1-18
-------
Remedial Actions: Site-specific Information By Innovative Treatment Technology Through FY 1992 June 199
Bioremediation (In situ)
Resion
Site Name, State,
(ROD Date)
Specific
Technology
Site Description
Media (Quantity)
Key Contaminants
Treated
Status#
Lead Agency
and Treatment
Contractor (if
available)
Contacts/Phone
1
Hocomonco Pond, ESD,
MA (07/30/92)
(ROD signed 09/30/85)
In situ ground
water if
bioremediation
fails will try
in situ flushing
Wood preserving
Groundwater
PAHs (Creosote),
Organics (DNAPLs)
Being
installed;
Installation
completion
planned Spring
1994
PRP
lead/Federal
oversight
Bob Leger
617-573-5734
2
FAA Technical Center*,
NJ (09/26/89)
See also Soil Vapor
Extraction
In situ ground
water
Jet fuel tank farm
Groundwater
VOCs (JP-4)
Design
completed but
not installed;
Design
completed 8/92
Federal
facility, FAA
lead
Carla Struble
212-264-4595
Keith Buch
(FAA)
609-485-6644
2
Swope Oil & Chern Co.,
OU 2, NJ (09/27/91)
See also Soil Vapor
Extraction
In situ soil
Bioventing with
soil vapor
extraction
Chemical
reclamation
Soil (258,000 cy)
SVOCs
(Naphthalene,
DEHP,
2-ethylhexyl-
phalate)
Predesign; PD
Completion
planned 1993
PRP
lead/Federal
Oversight
Joseph Gowers
212-264-5386
2
Applied Environmental
Services
(Groundwater), NY
(06/24/91)
In situ ground
water
Bulk petroleum and
hazardous waste
storage facility
Groundwater
VOCs (TEX)
In design;
Design
completion
planned Winter
1993
PRP lead/State
oversight
Andrew English
(NY)
518-457-0315
Jeff Tradd
518-457-1708
2
Applied Environmental
Services, OU 1, NY
(06/24/91)
See also Soil Vapor
Extraction, other
Technologies
In situ soil
Bulk petroleum and
hazardous waste
storage facility
Soil (quantity
unknown)
VOCs (BTEX),
SVOCs
(Naphthalene,
Bis(2-ethylhexyl)
phthalate,
Benzo(b))
In design;
Design
completion
planned Winter
1993
PRP lead/State
oversight;
Remediation
Technologies,
Inc.- Design
Contractor
Andrew English
(NY)
518-457-0315
Jeff Tradd
518-457-1708
3
L. A. Clarke & Sons,
OU 1 (Soils)*, VA
(03/31/88)
See also In situ
Flushing
In situ soil
follows creosote
recovery and in
situ flushing
Wood preserving
Soil (15,000 cy)
VOCs (Benzene),
PAHs (Creosote,
Carcinogenic
PAHs)
Predesign; PD
Completion
planned Fall
1994
PRP
lead/Federal
oversight; ICF
Kaiser
Andy Palestinl
215-597-1286
1-19
-------
Table 1-1
Remedial Actions: Site-specific Information By Innovative Treatment Technology Through FY 1992 June 199:
Bioremediation (In situ) (continued}
Region
Site Hame, State,
(R00 Date)
Specific
Technology
Site Description
Media (Quantity)
Key Contaminants
Treated
Status#
Lead Agency
end Treatment
Contractor (if
available)
Contacts/Phone
4
Cabot Carbon/Koppers,
FL (09/27/90)
See also
Bioremediation (Ex
Situ), Soil Washing
In situ soil
Treating
above/below gw
table by
nutrient
addition
Wood preserving,
Pine tar and
turpentine
manufacturing
Soil (5,000 cy)
SVOCs (PCP), PAHs
In design;
Design
completion
planned Spring
1994
PRP
lead/Federal
oversight;
McLaren-Hart
(Design
contractor)
Martha Berry
404-347-2643
4
Cabot Carbon/Koppers
(Groundwater), FL
(09/27/90)
In situ ground
water; treating
above and below
gu table with
nutrients
Wood preserving.
Pine tar and
turpentine
manufacturing
Groundwater
SVOCs (PCP), PAHS
In design;
Design
completion
planned Spring
1994
PRP
lead/Federal
oversight
McLaren-Hart
(Design
Contractor)
Martha Berry
404-347-2643
4
Benfield Industries,
NC (07/31/92)
See also
Bioremediation (Ex
Situ), Soil Washing
In situ ground
water; treatment
of aquifer soils
incidental to gw
remediation
Bulk chemical
mixing and
repackaging plant.
Groundwater
VOCs, SVOCs
Predesign
Federal
lead/Fund
Financed;
CDM/F.I.P.
Corporation
John Bornholm
404-347-7791
5
Seymour Recycling, IN
(09/30/87)
See also Soil Vapor
Extraction
In situ soil
Nutrients plowed
into soil
Chemical waste
management and
incineration
Soil (190,000 cy)
VOCs (TCA, Carbon
Tetrachloride,
TCE)
Completed;
Operational,
Simmer 1990,
August-October
1986, January-
February 1987
PRP
lead/Federal
oversight; ABB
Environmental
Services
Jeff Gore
312-886-6552
5
Seymour Recycling
(Groundwater), IN
(09/30/87)
In situ ground
water Gw
treatment
incidental to
soil treatment
Chemical waste
management and
incineration
Groundwater
VOCs, SVOCs, PAHs
Operational;
Gw treatment
was not
designed but
appears to be
occuring as a
result of in
situ soil
treatment
PRP
lead/Federal
oversight;
Geraghty Miller
Jeff Gore
312-886-6552
-------
Remedial Actions: Site-specific Information By Innovative Treatment Technology Through FY 1992
Bioremediation (In situ) (continued)
June 1992
Region
Site Name, State,
(ROD Date)
Specific
Technology
Site Description
Media (Quantity)
Key Contaminants
T reated
Status#
lead Agency
and Treatment
Contractor (if
available)
Contacts/Phone
5
Allied Chem & 1 ronton
Coke, QU 2*, OH
(12/28/90)
Bioremediation
(Jn Situ) of
lagoon sediments
Coke manufacturing
Sediments
(457,000 cy)
PAHs
In design;
Design
completion
planned Spring
1994
PRP
lead/Federal
oversight; IT
Corporation -
Design, Black &
Veetch -
subcontractor
Jim Van der
Kloot
312-353-9309
5
Hagen Farm Site,
Groundwater Control
QU, WI (09/30/92)
In situ ground
water
Industrial
landfill,
Municipal landfill
Groundwater
<»
VOCs (Vinyl
chloride, MEK,
Tetrahydrofuran,
Xylene)
In design;
Design
completion
planned Spring
1995
PRP
lead/Federal
oversight;
Warzyn - Prime
Steve Padovani
312-353-6755
5
Onalaska Municipal
Landfill*, UI
(08/14/905
In situ soil Air
injection but no
nutrient or
microbe addition
Municipal landfill
Soil (16,000 cy)
PAHs
(Naphthalene)
Design
completed but
not installed;
Completion '
planned Spring
1994;
Completed 3
month column
study with
higher
contamination.
Federal
lead/Fund
Financed; CH2M
Hill-prime
Kevin Adler
312-886-7078
6
Atchison/Santa
Fe/Clovis, NM
(09/23/88)
In situ soil
Railyard wastes
(diesel spills)
Soil (28,600 cy),
Sludge (quantity
unknown)
PAHs (Petroleum
hydrocarbons,
diesel fuel)
Operational;
Began in June
1992, will end
when petroleum
hydrocarbons
are less than
1,000 ppm
PRP
lead/Federal
oversight;
Radi an
Corporation
Ky Nichols
214-655-6783
6
Oklahoma Refining Co.,
OK (06/09/92)
See also
Bioremediation (Ex
Situ)
In situ soil
Petroleum refining
and reuse
Soil (43,300 cy)
VOCs, Organics
(LNAPLs)
Predesign
State lead/Fund
Financed
Noel Bennett
214-655-8514
1-21
-------
Table 1-1
Remedial Actions: Site-specific Information By innovative Treatment Technology Through FY 1992 June 199:
Bioremediation (In situ) (continued)
Region
Site Han*, State,
(ROD Date)
Specific
Technology
Site Description
Media (Quantity)
Key Contaminants
Treated
Status#
Lead Agency
and Treatment
Contractor (if
available)
Contacts/Phone
6
French Limited, TX
(03/24/883
Bioremediation
(In situ) In
Situ Lagoon
Petrochemical
Sludge 300,000
cy)
VOCs, PAHs
Operational;
Two 3.5 acre
cells; First
cell
completed;
second cell
scheduled to
be completed
August 1993
PRP lead/
Federal S State
oversight
Judith Black
214-655-6739
7
People's Natural Gas,
IA {09/16/91)
In situ soil
Coal gasification
Soil (18,500 cy),
Groundwater
VOCs (Benzene),
PAHs
Predesign; PD
Completion
planned Spring
1994
PRP
lead/Federal
oversight; BARR
Engineering
Bill Bum
913-551-7792
7
Pester Burn Pond, KS
<09/30/92)
See also In situ
Flushing
In situ soil
preceeded by in
situ soil
flushing
Refinery operation
Soil <70,000 cy)
PAHs
(Benzo(a)anthrace
ne, chrysene)
Predesign
PRP
lead/Federal
oversight
Marvin
Glotzbach (KS)
913-296-2783
8
Eroderick Wood
Products OU 2, CO
<03/24/92)
See also
Bioremediation
-------
laote 1-1
Remedial Actions: Site-specific Information By Innovative Treatment Technology Through FY 1992
June 199;
Bioremediation (In situ) (continued)
Region
Site Name, State,
(ROD Date)
Specific
Technology
Site Description
Media (Quantity)
Key Contaminants
Treated
Status#
Lead Agency
and Treatment
Contractor (if
available)
Contacts/Phone
8
Idaho Pole Company*,
HT (09/28/92)
See also
Bioremediation (Ex
Situ), In situ
Flushing
In situ ground
water injection
of oxygen and
nutrients
Wood preserving
Groundwater
SVOCs (PCP)
Predesign
In negotiation
Jim Harris
406-449-5414
8
Libby Groundwater
Contamination*, HT
(12/30/88)
See aLso
Bioremediation (Ex
Situ)
In situ ground
water Injection
of H202 and
Potasium
tripolyphosate
Wood preserving
Groundwater (40-
80 ft. deep)
VOCs (Benzene),
SVOCs (PCP), PAHs
(Creosote)
Operational;
Coupletion
planned 2001;
Operation
began in
Spetember 1991
PRP
lead/Federal
oversight;
Woodward-Clyde
Jim Harris
406-449-5414
Bert Bledsoe
(RSKERU
405-332-2313
9
Castle Air Force Base,
0U 1, CA (09/30/91)
In situ ground
water Treated gw
to be reinjected
w/ nutrients and
H202
Federal facility
with contamination
from multiple
sources
Groundwater
VOCs (TCE, PCE,
DCE, DCA, Carbon
tetrachloride.
Benzene)
In design;
Design
completion
planned Fall
1992; 2 phases
of
construction;
phase
I-constrction
started, phase
II-to begin
within 2 years
Federal
facility, U.S.
Air Force lead;
James
Montgomery/PRC
Environmental
Management,
Inc.
Michael Work
415-744-2392
Brad Hicks
(USAF)
209-726-4841
9
(Coppers Company, Inc.
(Oroville Plant), CA
(04/04/90)
See also Soil Washing
In situ soil
Followed by
fixation for
soil containing
metals
Wood preserving
Soil (100,000 cy)
SVOCs
(Polychlorinated
phenols), Dioxins
In design;
Design
completion
planned Summer
1993
PRP
lead/Federal
oversight
Fred Schauffler
415-744-2365
1-23
-------
Table 1-1
Remedial Actions: Site-specific Information By Innovative Treatment Technology Through FY 1992 June 1993
Bioremediation (In situ) (continued)
Region
Site None, State,
(ROD Date)
Specific
Technology
Site Description
Hedia (Quantity)
Key Contaminants
Treated
Status#
Lead Agency
and Treatment
Contractor (if
available)
Contacts/Phone
10
Eielson Air Force
Base*, AK (09/29/92)
See also Soil Vapor
Extraction
In situ soil
Bioventing
Tactical air
support
installation
Soil (quantity
unknown)
VOCs (JP-4),
SVOCs, PAHS
(Petroleun
Hydrocarbons,
Diesel) BTEX
In design;
Design
completion
planned Sumner
1993
Federal
Facility/EPA
and State
oversight;
DERA; EA
Engineering
-Design
Hary Jane
Mearman
206-553-6642
Rielle Markey
CAK)
907-451-2117
Capt, Max Gandy
(Eielson AFB)
907-377-4361
1-24
-------
laDie i-1
Remedial Actions: Site-specific Information By Innovative Treatment Technology Through FY 1992
June 199
Chemical Treatment
Region
Site Name, State,
(ROD Date)
Specific
Technology
Site Description
Media (Quantity)
Key Contaminants
Treated
Status#
Lead Agency
and Treatment
Contractor (if
available)
Contacts/Phone
4
JFD
EIect roni cs/ChanneI
Master, NC (09/10/92)
Oxidation using
with hydrogen
peroxide
Solvent recovery
facility
Soil (800 cy),
Sludge (2,200 cy)
Inorganic
Cyanides
Predesign; PD
Completion
planned Sumner
1994
In negotiation
McKenzie
Mallary
404-347-7791
4
Palmetto Wood
Preserving*, SC
(09/30/87)
Reduction of
Cr(6) to Cr(3)
using Sodium
metaphosphate
Wood preserving
Soil (12,700 cy)
Metals (Chromium,
Arsenic, Copper)
Completed;
Operational
from 9/88 to
2/89
Federal
lead/Fund
Financed; Roy
F. Ueston
Al Cherry
404-342-7791
8
Portland Cement Co.
(Kiln Dust No.2 and
No.3) OU 2, UT
(03/31/92)
Chemical
T reatment
Cement plant
(waste chrome
bearing bricks)
Solids (360 Tons
of Brick)
Metals (Chrome
VI)
In design;
Design
completion
planned Sumner
1994
State lead/Fund
Financed; URS
Consultants
Mike McCeney
303-294-7169
1-25
-------
Table 1-1
Remedial Actions: She-specific Information By Innovative Treatment Technology Through FY 1992 June 199;
Dechlorination
Region
Site Heme, State,
(ROO Date)
Specific
Technology
Site Description
Media (Quantity)
Key Contaminants
Treated
Status#
Lead Agency
and Treatment
Contractor (if
available)
Contacts/Phone
2
Hyers Property, NJ
(09/28/90)
See also Soil Washing
Dechlorination
followed by
soil Hashing
Pesticide
manufacturing/use
/storage
Soil (49,000 cy),
Sediments (1,000
cy)
SVOCs
(Hexachlorobenzene),
Biocides (DDT, DDE,
DDD), Dioxins
(2,3,7,8-TCDD)
In design;
Design
completion
planned
Winter 1994;
Design
initiated
concurrently
with
treatability
studies
PRP
lead/Federal
oversight;
Hetcalf & Eddy
John Prince
212-264-1213
2
Wide Beach
Development, NY
(09/30/85)
Dechlorination
with APEG
Contaminated road
dust, driveways,
ditches
Soil (40,000 cy)
PCBs
Completed;
Operational
from 10/90 tb
6/91
Federal
lead/Fund
Financed;
Soiltech Inc.
(subonctractor
to Kimmirts)
Herb King
212-264-1129
3
Saunders Supply Co, OU
1, VA (09/30/91)
See also Thermal
Desorption
Dechlorination
Wood preserving
Sludge (700 cy)
Dioxins (TCDD
equivalents)
Predesign; PD
Completion
planned Fall
1993
Federal
lead/Fund
Financed;
Ecology &
Environment, no
vendor yet
Andy Palestini
215-597-1286
4
Smith's Farm Brooks,
0U 1*, KY (09/30/91)
See also Thermal
Desorption
Dechlorination
Drum storage/
disposal
Soil (16,000 cy)
PCBs
Design
completed but
not
installed;
Completion
planned
Spring 1995
PRP
lead/Federal
oversight
Soiltech
Tony DeAngelo
404-347-7791
4
Arlington Blending &
Packaging Co., 0U 1*,
TN (06/28/91)
See also Thermal
Desorption
Dechlorination
Pesticide
manufactur i ng/use
/storage, Other
organic chemical
manufacturing
Liquid (quantity
unknown)
VOCs (DCE), SVOCs
(PCP), Biocides
(Chlordane,
Heptaclor)
In design;
Design
completion
planned
Winter 1993
PRP
lead/Federal
oversight
Derek Hatory
404-347-7791
1-26
-------
i auie i" i
Remedial Actions: Site-specific Information By Innovative Treatment Technology Through FY 1992
June 199:
In Situ Flushing
Region
Site Name, State,
(ROD Date)
Specific
Technology
Site Description
Media (Quantity)
Key Contaminants
Treated
Status#
Lead Agency
and Treatment
Contractor (if
available)
Contacts/Phone
1
Tibbetts Road*, NH
(09/29/92)
See also Soil Vapor
Extraction
Soil flushing
Illegal dumping
site, primarily
painting wastes
and solvents.
Soil (50,000 cy)
VOCs (PCE, TCE),
Metals (Arsenic,
Chromium)
Predesign
Still in
negotiation
Darryl Luce
617-573-5767
Mike Robinette
(NH)
603-271-2014
2
lipari Landfill*, NJ
<09/30/85)
Soil flushing
Flushing of area
mi"thin the
slurry wall,
including soil
and wastes.
Industrial
landfill,
Municipal landfill
Soil (650,000 cy)
VOCs (Bis-2-
chloroethylether,
DCA,
D i ch I oromethane),
SVOCs (Phenol),
Metals (Chromium,
Lead, Nickel,
Mercury)
Operational;
Completion
planned 1999
Federal
lead/Fund
Financed; AUD,
Inc.
Fred Cataneo
212-264-9542
2
Naval Air Engineering
Center 0U 7, interim
action, NJ (03/16/92)
Soil flushing
Federal facility-
landfill, fire
fighting training
areas, and other
disposal
Soil (quantity
unknown)
vocs (Vinyl
chloride, TCE,
PCE, and 1,2-DCE,
BTEX), PAHs
(Petroleum
hydrocarbons)
In design;
Interim
remedial
action,to be
implemented
for 3 years.
U.S. Navy/EPA
oversite;
Aguilar
Jeff Gratz
212-264-6667
Robert Wing
212-264-8670
2
Vineland Chemical, 0U
1 and 0U 2, NJ
(09/29/89)
See also Soil Washing
Soil flushing
Flushing lagoons
using treated gw
Pesticide
manufacturi ng/use
/storage
Soil (126,000 cy)
Metals (Arsenic)
In design;
Design
completion
planned 1993
Federal
lead/Fund
Financed
EBASCO-Design
Matthew
Uestgate
212-264-3406
Steve Hadel
(USACE-Kansas
City)
816-426-5221
2
Byron Barrel & Drum,
NY (09/29/89)
Soil flushing
Drum storage/
disposal
Soil (5,200 cy),
Groundwater
VOCs (TCE, DCE,
TCA, MiK), Metals
(Chromium, Lead)
Predesign; P0
Completion
planned Fall
1994
PRP
lead/Federal
oversight;
Dames and Moore
Eduardo
Gonzales
212-264-5714
2
Pasley Solvents and
Chemicals, Inc., NY
(04/24/92)
See also Soil Vapor
Extraction
Soil flushing
Tank farm and
chemical
distribution
facility
Soil (13,000 cy)
SVOCs
(Naphthalene)
In design
Federal
lead/Fund
Financed;
Ebasco - Design
contractor
Sherrel Henry
212-264-8675
1-27
-------
Table 1-1
Remedial Actions: Site-specific Information By Innovative Treatment Technology Throuflh FY 1992 June 1993
In Situ Rushing (continued)
Region
Site Name, State,
(ROD Date)
Specific
Technology
Site Description
Media (Quantity)
Key Contaminants
Treated
Status# I Lead Agency
| and Treatment
| Contractor (if
I available)
Contacts/Phone
3
L. A. Clarke & Sons,
OU 1 (Soils)*, VA
(03/31/88)
See also
Biorecnediation (In
situ)
Soil flushing
with surfactants
before in situ
bforemediation
Wood preserving
Soil (15,000 cy)
VOCs (Benzene),
PAHs (Creosote,
carcinogenic
PAHs)
In design;
Design
conpletion
planned Fall
1994
PRP
lead/Federal
oversight; ICF
Kaiser
Andy Palestini
215-597-1286
3'
U.S. Titanium*, VA
(11/21/89)
Dissolution of
wastes (EPA is
considering
excavation and
ex situ
dissolution of
wastes)
Titanium oxide
production from
ore digested with
sulfuric acid
Soil (16,000 cy),
Solids (16,000 cy)
Inorganics
(Ferrous sulfate)
In design;
Design
completion
planned Fall
1993
PRP lead/State
Enforcement
lead; Scitech
Vance Evans
215-597-8485
Jeff Howard
(VA)
804-225-3262
4
Ciba-Geigy (Haclntosh
Plant) OU 4, AL
(07/14/92)
See also Thermal
Desorption
Soil flushing
Chemical
Manufacturing
Soil 110 cy
Chortnated
pesticides, BHC
Isomers, VOCs
(Chloroform,
Toluene,
Xylenes),
Biocides
(Atrazine,
Diazinon,
Prometryn,
Simazine), Metals
(Copper, Lead,
Arsenic,.
Chromium, Iron
slurry)
Predesign;
Design also
will use
treatability
studies at
OU-2
PRP
lead/Federal
oversight
Charles King
404-347-2643
4
Ciba-Geigy (Macintosh
Plant) OU 2, AL
(09/30/91)
See also Thermal
Desorption
Soil flushing
Agriculture
Applications,
Pesticide
manufacturtng/use
/storage, other
organic chemical
manufacturing
Soil/Sludge (130
cy)
VOCs (BTEX)
Chloroform,
Biocides (ODD,
DDT, DDE, BHCs,
Diazinon,
Chlorobenzilate)
Predesign; PD
Completion
planned
Winter 1995;
PRP
lead/Federal
oversight;
CDM/FPC
(Demolition/
Design
contractors)
Charles King
404-347-2643
1-28
-------
laoie i-1
Remedial Actions: Site-specific Information By Innovative Treatment Technology Through FY 1992
June 1992
In Situ Flushing (continued)
Region
Site Name, State,
(ROD Date)
Specific
Technology
Site Description
Media (Quantity)
Key Contaminants
T reated
Status#
Lead Agency
and Treatment
Contractor (if
available)
Contacts/Phone
4
JADCO-Hughes, NC
(09/27/90)
See also Soil Vapor
Extraction
Soil flushing
Preceded by soil
vapor extraction
using the same
horizontal wells
Plastics
manufacturing,
Other organic
chemical
manufacturing.
Other inorganic
chemical
manufacturing,
Drum storage/
disposal,
Municipal water
supply
Soil (6,000 cy)
VOCs (TCE, Vinyl
chloride. Carbon
Tetrachloride,
Chloroform, BTX),
SVOCs
(Dichlorobenzene,
TrichIorobenzene)
Bei ng
installed;
Pilot study
underway
Completion of
pilot planned
Summer 1993
PRP
lead/Federal
oversight;
Conestoga-
Rovers &
Associates
(Design
contractor)
Mi cheat
Townsend
404-347-7791
Bruce Nicholson
(NC)
919-733-2801
5
Ninth Avenue Dump, IN
(06/30/89)
Soil flushing of
area within
slurry wall
Industrial
landfi11
Soil (64,000 cy),
Groundwater
VOCs (TCE, BTEX)
In design;
Design
completion
planned
Summer 1996;
PRP
lead/Federal
oversight;
Fluor-Daniel
Bernard Schorle
312-886-4746
5
Rasmussen Dump, MI
(03/28/91)
Soil flushing
(flushing part
of recycle of
treated gw)
Industrial
landfill,
Paint/ink
formation
Soil (quantity
unknown)
VOCs (Vinyl
chloride,
Benzene)
In design;
Design
completion
planned Fall
1994
PRP
lead/Federal
oversight;
Woodward Clyde
- Prime
Ken Glatz
312-886-1434
6
Koppers/Texarkana*, TX
(09/23/88)
See also Soil Uashing
Soil flushing
with reinjection
of treated water
to 1 ft below
surface
Wood preserving
Soil (19,400 cy)
PAHs
(Benzo(a)pyrene,
Creosote), Metals
(Arsenic)
Predesign;
Design
activity is
on hold while
EPA relocates
the affected
community.
PRP
lead/Federal
oversight; ENSR
(Demolition
contractor)
Ursula Lennox
214-655-6743
6
South Cavalcade
Street*, TX (09/26/88)
See also Soil Washing
Soil flushing
with the same
surfactants used
for the soiIs
treated with
soil washing
Wood preserving
Soil (20,000 cy)
SVOCs, PAHs
(Benzo(a)pyrene,
Benzo(a)
anthracene,
Chrysene)
In design;
Design
completion
planned
Summer 1994
PRP
lead/Federal
oversight
Glan Celerier
214-655-8523
1-29
-------
Table 1-1
Remedial Actions: Site-specific Information By Innovative Treatment Technology Through FY 1992 June 199;
In Situ Rushing (continued)
| Region
I Site Heme, State,
(R00 Date)
Specific
Technology
Site Description
Media (Quantity)
Key Contaminants
Treated
Status#
Lead Agency
and Treatment
Contractor (if
available)
Contacts/Phone
7
Pester Burn Pond, KS
(09/30/92)
See also
Bioremediation (In
Situ)
Soil flushing
followed by in
situ
bioremediation
Refinery operation
Soil (70,000 cy),
Sludge (30,000 cy)
PAHs
(Benzo(a)anthrace
ne, Chrysene)
Predesign
PRP
lead/Federal
oversight
Marvin
Glotzbach (KS)
913-296-2783
7
Lee Chemical, HO
(03/21/91)
Soil flushing
Solvent recovery
facility
Soil (quantity
unknown)
VOCs (TCE)
Being
installed;
Installation
completion
planned
Summer 1993
PRP lead/State
oversight;
Clark Uell and
Equipment, Inc.
Steven Kinser
913-551-7728
Ron Redden (MO)
314-751-8393
8
Idaho Pole Company*,
NT (09/28/92)
See also
Bioremediation (Ex
Situ), Bioremediation
(In Situ)
Soil flushing
Wood preserving
Soil (6,500 cy)
SVOCs (PCP), PAHs
Predesign
In negotiation
Jim Harris
406-449-5414
10
Union Pacific Railroad
Sludge Pit, ID
(09/10/91)
Soil flushing
RaiI road
operations,
cleaning and
fueling
Soil (quantity
unknown)
VOCs (PCE.TCE),
PAHs (Petroleum
hydrocarbons),
Metals
(Arsenic,Cadmium)
Predesign; PD
Completion
planned Fall
1993
PRP
lead/Federal
oversight
Rob Hanson
208-334-5860
Gordon Brown
208-236-6160
10
United Chrome
Products*, OR
(09/12/86)
Soil flushing
Chrome plating
facility
Soil (quantity
unknown)
Metals (Chromium
VI)
Operational;
Operations
began during
Sumner 1988
PRP lead/EPA
oversite.;
CH2HHIII &
subcontractors
Al Goodman
503-326-3685
1-30
-------
Remedial Actions: Site-Specific Information By Innovative Treatment Technology Through FY 1992 June 199:
In Situ Vitrification
Region
Site Name, State,
(ROD Date)
Specific
Technology
Site Description
Media (Quantity)
Key Contaminants
T reated
Status#
Lead Agency
and Treatment
Contractor (if
available)
Contacts/Phone
5
Ionia City Landfill*,
MI (09/29/89)
In situ
Vitrification
Municipal landfill
Soil (5,000 cy)
VOCs (Methylene
Chloride, TCA,
Styrene, Toluene),
Metals (Lead)
In design;
Design
completion
planned Sumner
1994
PRP
lead/Federal
oversight;
Earth
Technology
Corporation
Michael Gifford
312-886-7257
8
Rocky Mountain
Arsenal, M-1 Basins
(OU 16), CO (02/26/90)
In situ
Vitrification
Federal Facility
Basin which
received
miscellaneous
wastes
Soil (4,600 cy),
Sludge (5,800 cy)
Biocides, Metals
(Arsenic, Mercury)
In design;
Design
completion
planned 1993;
On hold
pending
reentry of
vendors into
the market
U. S. Army
(PRP) lead
Connally Mears
303-293-1528
8
Wasatch Chemical*, UT
(03/29/91)
See also
Bioremediation (Ex
Situ)
In situ
Vitrification
Pesticide
manufactur i ng/use
/storage, Other
organic chemical
manufacturing.
Other inorganic
chemical
manufacturing
Soil (3,600 cy),
Sludge (quantity
unknown), Solids
(quantity
unknown)
SVOCs
(Hexach I orobenzene,
PCP), Biocides,
Dioxins
In design-
Design
completion
planned Summer
1993
PRP
lead/Federal
oversight;
Geosafe
Bert Garcia
303-293-1526
1-31
-------
Table 1-1
Remedial Actions: Site-Specific information By innovative Treatment Technology Through FY 1992
June 1993
So# Vapor Extraction
Region
Site Name, State,
(ROD Date)
Specific
Technology
Site Description
Media (Quantity)
Key Contaminants
Treated
Status#
Lead Agency and
Treatment
Contractor (if
avaiIable)
Contacts/Phone
1
Kellogg-Deering Well
Field, CT (09/29/89)
Soil vapor
extraction
Solvent recovery
facility,
Industrial
Complex, Illegal
dumping of solvent
wastes
Soil (quantity
unknown)
VOCs (TCE, PCE,
DCE, TCA, DCA,
Vinyl chloride,
BTEX)
In design;
Design
completion
planned Fall
1994
PRP lead/Federal
oversight; GZA
Geoenvironmental
Leslie McVickar
617-573-9689
1
Groveland Wells*, HA
(09/30/88)
Soil vapor
extraction
(carbon
absorption for
air emissions)
Manufacturing
Soil (19,000 cy)
VOCs (TCE,
Methylene
Chloride, DCE)
Operational
PRP lead/Federal
oversight; Terra
Vac
Bob Leger
617-573-5734
1
Sitresim, HA
(09/19/91)
Soil vapor
extraction
Chemical waste
reclamation
Soil (1,370 cy)
VOCs (TCE, TCA,
Carbon
Tetrachloride,
Chloroform,
Styrene)
In design;
Design
completion
planned Winter
1994
Federal
lead/Fund
F i nanced
Leslie McVikar
617-573-9689
1
Wells G&H OU 1, HA
(09/14/89)
Soil vapor
extraction with
air flushing
Druti storage/
disposal, Leaking
UST and midnight
dumping
Soil (7,400 cy)
VOCs (PCE, TCE)
Operational;
OU 1 consists
of 5
properties,
the technolgy
has become
operational on
some of the
properties.
PRP lead/Federal
oversight;
Several
contractors
working on the
site
Mary Barren
617-573-9613
Paula
Fitzsimnons
617-223-5572
1
Mottolo Pig Farm, NH
(03/29/91)
Soil vapor
extraction
Uncontrolled waste
site
Soil (3,400 cy)
VOCs (TCE, TCA,
Vinyl chloride,
DCA, DCE, Toluene,
Ethylbenzene)
Being
installed;
Construction
to start
sunnier 1993
Federal
lead/Fund
Financed
Roger Duwart
617-573-9628
Michael
Robinette (NH)
603-271-2014
1
South Municipal Water
Supply Well*, NH
(09/27/89)
See also Other
Technologies
Soil vapor
extraction; Air
sparging of gw
Ball Bearing
Manufacturing
Soil (7,500 cy),
Groundwater
VOCs (PCE, TCA,
TCE)
Being
installed;
Construction
to start
summer 1993
PRP lead/Federal
oversight
Roger Duwart
617-573-9628
Tom Andrews
(NH)
603-271-2910
1-T?
-------
Remedial Actions: Site-specific Information By Innovative Treatment Technology Through FY 1992
Soil Vapor Extraction (continued)
June 1992
Region
Site Name, State,
(ROD Date)
Specific
Technology
Site Description
Media (Quantity)
Key Contaminants
Treated
Status#
Lead Agency and
Treatment
Contractor (if
available)
Contacts/Phone
1
Tibbetts Road*, NH
(09/29/92)
See also In situ
Flushing
Soil vapor
extraction
Illegal dumping
site, primarily
painting wastes
and solvents.
Soil <50,000 cy)
VOCs (PCE, TCi)
Predesign
In negotiation
Darryl Luce
617-573-576?
Kike Robinette
(NH DES)
603-271-2014
1
Ti nkfiam Garage*, NH
(09/30/86)
Soil vapor
extraction
(carbon
absorption for
air emissions)
Illegal dumping
site
Soil (9,000 cy)
VOCs (TCE,
Chloroform, DCE,
Vinyl chloride.
Benzene)
In design;
Operation
scheduled to
begin summer
1994
PRP lead/Federal
oversight; Terra
Vac
Diana King
617-573-9676
1
Stamina Hills, RI
(09/28/90)
Soil vapor
extraction
Textile
Manufacturing
Soil (6,000 cy)
VOCs (DCE, TCE)
Predesign; PD
Completion
planned Fall
1993
PRP lead/Federal
oversight
Neil Handler
617-573-9636
Mark Dennsn (RI
DEM)
401-277-2797
2
A O Polymer, Soil
treatment phase, NJ
(06/28/91)
Soil vapor
extraction
(carbon
adsorption for
air emissions)
Polymer
manufacturing
Soil (7,500 cy)
VOCs (TCE, TCA,
Trichlorofluoromet
hane, Toluene,
Ethylbenzene),
SVOCs
(Naphthalene,
4-methylphenol)
In design;
Design
completion
planned Winter
1993
PRP lead/Federal
oversight;
Narding-Lawson
Rich Puvogel
212-264-9836
2
•FAA Technical
Center*, NJ
(09/26/89)
See also
Bioremediation (In
Situ)
Soil vapor
extraction
Jet fuel tank farm
Soil (33,000 cy)
VOCs (BTEX), SVOCs
(Chlorophenol,
Phenol)
Design
completed but
not installed;
Design
completed 8/92
Federal
facility, FAA
lead
Carla Struble
212-264-4595
Keith Buch
(FAA)
609-485-6644
1-33
-------
Table 1-1
Remedial Actions: Site-specific Information By Innovative Treatment Technology Through FY 1992 June 1993
Soil Vapor Extraction (continued}
Region
Site Mane, state,
(R00 Date)
Specific
Technology
Site Description
Media (Quantity)
Key Contaminants
Treated
Status#
Lead Agency end
Treatment
Contractor (if
available)
Contacts/Phone
2
Garden State
Cleaners, HJ
(09/26/91)
Soil vapor
extraction
Dry cleaners
Soil (300 cy)
VOCs (PCE)
In design;
Design
completion
planned Sunnier
1994,- The
usace is doing
the design for
EPA
Federal
lead/Fund
Financed
Sharon Atkinson
212-264-1217
2
South Jersey
Clothing, NJ
(09/26/91)
Soil vapor
extraction
Dry'Cleaners,
Clothing
manufacturer
Soil (1,400 cy)
VOCs (TCE)
In design;
Design
completion
planned 1993;
The USACE is
doing the
design for
EPA.
Federal
lead/Fund
Financed
Sharon Atkinson
212-264-1217
2
Swope Oft & Chew Co.,
OU 2, NJ (09/27/91)
See also
Bforemediation (In
Situ)
Soil vapor
extraction
Vacuum
extraction.Biove
nting (Mot
planned yet)
Chemical
reclamation
Soil (258,000 cy)
VOCs (TCE, PCE,
Toluene,
Ethylbenzene,
Xylene)
Predesfgn; PD
Completion
planned 1993
PRP
lead/Federal
oversight
Joseph Gowers
212-264-5386
2
Applied Environmental
Services, OU 1, NY
(06/24/91)
See also
Bforemediation (In
Situ), Other
Technologies
Soil vapor
extraction with
air flushing
with air
sparging
Bulk petroleum and
hazardous waste
storage facility
Soil (quantity
unknown)
VOCs (BTEX)
In design;
Design
completion
planned Winter
1993
PRP lead/State
oversight;
RETECH - Design
Contractor
Andrew English
(NY)
518-457-0315
Jeff Tradd
518-457-1708
2
Ci rcui tron
Corporation, OU 1, MY
(03/29/91)
Soil vapor
extraction
Electroplating
Soil (900 cy)
VOCs (TCA, PCE,
TCE, DCA)
In design;
Design
completion
planned Fall
1993
Federal
lead/Fund
Financed; ICF -
Design
Contractor
Mi to Fayon
212-264-4706
1 *3 A
-------
Remedial Actions: Site-specific Information By Innovative Treatment Technology Through FY 1992
Soil Vapor Extraction (continued)
June 199
Region
Site Name, State,
(ROD Date)
Specific
Technology
Site Description
Media (Quantity)
Key Contaminants
Treated
Status#
Lead Agency and
T reatment
Contractor (if
available)
Contacts/Phone
2
Genzale Plating
Company, OU 1, NY
(03/29/91)
Soil vapor
extraction
precedes
excavation for
off-site
solidification
Electroplating
Soil (275 cy)
VOCs (TCE, TCA)
In design;
Design
completion
planned Spring
1994
Federal
lead/Fund
Financed; CDM
Janet Cappelli
212-264-8679
2
Mattiace
Petroehanl cats
Company, OU 1, NY
(06/27/91)
Soil vapor
extraction
Organic chemicals
blending
Soil (17,000 cy)
VOCs (PCE, TCE,,
Benzene, Xylene)
Predesign; PD
Completion
planned Winter
1993
Federal
lead/Fund
F i nanced;
ARCR-PD
Edward Als
212-264-0522
2
Pasley Solvents and
Chemicals, Inc., MY
(04/24/92)
See also In situ
Flushing
Soil vapor
extraction
Tank farm and
chemical
distribution
facility
Soil (13,000 cy)
VOCs (TCE, PCE,
Benzene)
In design
Federal
lead/Fund
Financed; Ebasco
- Design
contractor
Sherrel Henry
212-264-8675
2
SMS Instruments (Deer
Park), NY (09/29/89)
Soil vapor
extraction with
catalytic
combustor for
vapors
Military aircraft
component
overhauler
Soil <1,250 cy)
VOCs (TCE), SVOCs
(D i chIorobenzene)
Operational;
Completion
planned Summer
1993; Will be
evaluated in
Summer 1993 to
determine if
performance
standards are
achieved
Federal
lead/Fund
Financed; Four
Seasons
Miko Fayon
212-264-4706
2
Solvent Savers, NY
(09/30/90)
See also Thermal
Desorption
Soil vapor
extraction
Solvent recovery
facility, Chemical
reclamation
Soil (quantity
unknown)
VOCs (DCE, TCE)
Predesign; PD
Completion
planned Winter
1993
PRP lead/Federal
oversight
Lisa Wong
212-264-9348
212-264-5712
2
Vestal Water Supply
1-1, NY (09/27/90)
Soil vapor
extraction
Industrial park
Soil (25,000 cy)
VOCs (DCA, TCA,
TCE, DCE)
Predesign; PD
Completion
planned Winter
1993
Area 2 - Fund
lead; Area 4 -
PRP lead
Ed Als
212-264-052?
1-35
-------
Table 1-1
Remedial Actions: Site-specific Information By Innovative Treatment Technology Through FY 1992 June 1992
Soil Vapor Extraction (continued)
Region
Site Name, State,
(R00 Date)
Specific
Technology
Site Description
Hedia (Quantity)
Key Contaminants
Treated
Status#
Lead Agency and
Treatment
Contractor (if
avaiIable)
Contacts/Phone
2
Upjohn Manufacturing
Co., PR (09/30/88)
Soil vapor
extraction
Industrial
facility, chemical
leak
Soil (quantity
unknown)
VOCs (Carbon
Tetrachloride,
Acetonitrile)
Completed;
Operational
1/83 to 3/88
PRP lead/Federal
oversight; Terra
Vac
Alison Hess
212-264-6040
3
Bendix OU 3, PA
(09/30/88)
Soil vapor
extraction with
air flushing
Ai rcraft
instrumentation
manufacturing
Soil (33,000 cy)
VOCs (PCE, TCE,
Vinyl chloride)
Predesign; PD
Technology on
hold pending
review of
Treatability
Study
PRP lead/Federal
oversight; ERM,
Inc.
Humane Zia
215-597-0913
3
Cryochem, OU 3, PA
(09/30/91)
Soil vapor
extraction
Machine shops,
Metal fabrication
Soil (70 cy)
VOCs (TCA, TCE,
PCE, DCA, DCE)
Predesign; PD
Completion
planned Fall
1993
Federal
lead/Fund
Financed; CH2M
Hill
Joe McDowell
215-597-8240
3
Henderson Road*, PA
(06/30/88)
Soil vapor
extraction with
air flushing
(Treating
unsaturated soil
and bedrock)
Injection well
Soil (74,000 cy)
VOCs (DCA, TCA,
Toluene)
Operational;
Completion
date unknown
PRP lead/Federal
oversight; RT
Environmental
Services.
Joe McDowell
215-597-8240
3
Lord-Shope Landfill*,
PA (06/29/90)
Soil vapor
extraction
(method to be
determined in
design)
Industrial
landfill
Soil (270,000 cy)
VOCs (PCE, TCE,
Vinyl chloride,
Alcohols,
n-butanol), SVOCs
(Ketones)
In design;
Design
completion
planned Winter
1993
PRP lead/Federal
oversight;
Eckenfelder
Dave Turner
215-597-3218
3
Raymark*, PA
(12/30/91)
Soil vapor
extraction
Multi-source metal
fabrication
facility
Soil (quantity
unknown). Solids
(quantity
unknown)
VOCs (TCE, PCE,
1,2-DCi)
Being
installed;
Installation
completion
planned Winter
1993
Federal
lead/Fund
Financed
Harry Harbold
215-597-1101
1 JK6
-------
Remedial Actions: Site-specific Information By Innovative Treatment Technology Through FY 1992
Soil Vapor Extraction (continued)
June 199:
Region
Site Name, State,
(ROD Date)
Specific
Technology
Site Description
Media (Quantity)
Key Contaminants
Treated
Status#
Lead Agency and
Treatment
Contractor (if
available)
Contacts/Phone
3
Tyson's Dump*, PA
(03/31/88)
Soil vapor
extraction with
air flushing
(The system has
been modified
during
operations)
Abandoned septic
and chemical waste
disposal site
Soil (30,000 cy)
VOCs (Benzene,
Toluene, Xylene),
SVOCs
(T r i chIoropropane)
Operational
Completion
date unknown
PRP lead/Federal
oversight; Terra
Vac
Eugene Dennis
215-597-3153
3
Arrowhead
Assoc i ates/Scovi11,
OU 1, VA (09/30/91)
Soil vapor
extraction with
air flushing
Electroplating
Soil (1,000 cy)
VOCs (TCE, PCE)
Predesign; PD
Completion
planned Summer
1993
PRP lead/Federal
oversight; ICF
Kaiser
Ron Davis
215-597-1727
3
Defense General
Supply Center, OU 5*,
VA (03/25/92)
Soil vapor
extraction
Cleaning and
repainting of
combat helmets and
gas cylinders
Soil (1,000 cy)
VOCs (PCE, TCE)
In design;
Design
completion
planned Summer
1993; 95% of
design
complete.
Federal Facility
DLA Lead/Federal
oversight;
Engineering-Scie
nee
Jack Potosnak
215-597-2317
Bill Sadington
(DGSC)
804-279-3781
4
Hollingsworth
SolderIess, FL
(04/10/86)
Soil vapor
extraction
Electroplating
Soil (62 cy)
VOCs (TCE, Vinyl
chloride, DCE)
Completed;
Operational
from 1/91 to
7/91
Federal
lead/Fund
Financed; Ebasco
John Zinmerman
404-347-2643
4
Robins AFB, Landfill
and Sludge Lagoon, OU
1, GA (06/28/91)
Soil vapor
extraction
Federal facility,
sludge from an
industrial waste
water treatment
plant
Soil (15,000 cy),
Sludge (quantity
unknown)
VOCs (TCE, PCE,
Vinyl chloride,
Carbon
Tetrachloride)
Predesign; PD
Completion
planned Summer
1992; PD
completion
planned Sumter
1992
Federal
Facility, U.S.
Air Force
Lead/Federal
Oves
Roseanne Rudd
404-347-7791
1-37
-------
Table 1-1
Remedial Actions: Site-specific Information By Innovative Treatment Technology Through FY 1992 June 199:
Soil Vapor Extraction (continued)
Region
Site Name, State,
(ROD Date)
Specific
Technology
Site Description
Media (Quantity)
Key Contaminants
Treated
Status#
Lead Agency and
Treatment
Contractor (if
available)
Contacts/Phone
4
Charles Macon Lagoon,
Lagoon #7, OU 1, NC
<09/30/913
Soil vapor
extraction with
air flushing
Petroleum refining
and reuse, Drum
storage/di sposaI,
Waste oil recycler
Soil (1,300 cy3,
Sludge (quantity
unknown)
VOCs (PCE)
In design;
Design
completion
planned Simmer
1994
PRP lead/Federal
oversight; RKT
Giezelle
Bennett (EPA)
404-347-7791
Patrick Walters
(NC)
919-733-2801
4
JADCQ-Hughes, NC
(09/27/90}
See also In situ
Flushing
Soil vapor
extraction Kith
horizontal wells
Followed by in
situ flushing
with same ports
Plastics
manufacturing,
Other organic
chemical
manufacturing.
Other inorganic
chemical
manufacturing,
Drum storage/
disposal,
Municipal water
supply
Soil (6,000 cy)
VOCs (Carbon
tetrachloride,
Chloroform, Vinyl
chloride, BTX),
SVOCs
(Dichlorobenzene,
Trichlorobenzene)
In design;
Design
completion
planned Winter
1993;
TreatabiIi ty
study being
conducted in
design
PRP lead/Federal
oversight
Micheal
Townsend
404-347-7791
Bruce Nicholson
(NC)
919-733-2801
4
Medley Farm, OU 1, SC
(05/29/91)
Soil vapor
extraction
Other organic
chemical
manufacturing,
Rubber
manufacturing,
Drum storage/
disposal
Soil (50,000 cy)
VOCs (DCA, DCE,
TCA, Benzene,
Toluene), SVOCs
(Phthalates)
Predesign;
Design
completion
planned for
Summer 1993
PRP lead/Federal
oversight
RMI, Inc.
Ralph Howard
404-347-7791
Richard Haynes
(SO
803-734-5487
4
SCRDI Bluff Road, SC
(09/12/90)
Sol I vapor
extraction with
air flushing
Drum storage/
disposal, Solvent
recovery facility
Soil (45,000 cy)
VOCs (TCA, TCE,
PCA, PCE, DCA,
DCE, MEK,
Chlorobenzene,
BTEX)
Predesign; PD
Completion
planned Fall
1993;
Litigation
from
surrounding
landowners has
delayed
progress.
PRP lead/Federal
oversight ERM,
DeMaximus
Steve Sandler
404-347-7791
1-38
-------
June 199
Region
Site Name, State,
(ROD Date)
Specific
Technology
Site Description
Media (Quantity)
Key Contaminants
T reated
Status#
Lead Agency and
Treatment
Contractor (if
available)
Contacts/Phone
4
Carrier Air
Conditioning*, TN
(09/03/92)
Soil vapor
extraction with
air flushing
Manufacturer of
heating and air
conditioning units
Soil (76,500 cy)
VOCs (TCE)
Design
completed but
not installed;
Completion
planned Fall
1993
PRP lead/Federal
oversight;
Environmental
Safety &
Designs, Inc.
Beth Brown
404-347-7791
5
Acme Solvent
Reclaiming, Inc. OU
2, IL (12/31/90)
See also Thermal
Desorption
Soil vapor
extraction with
air flushing
Industrial
landfill,
Municipal water
supply
Soil (quantity
unknown)
VOCs (DCA, TCA,
DCE, TCE, PCE,
Vinyl chloride,
Benzene)
In design;
Design
completion
planned Sumner
1994
PRP lead/Federal
oversight;
Harding/Lawson -
Prime
Deborah Orr
312-886-7576
5
American Chemical
Services*, IN
(09/30/92)
See also Thermal
Desorption
Soil vapor
extraction with
air flushing
bi oenhancement
for SV0Cs;air
flushing
w/vertica wells
Other organic
chemical
manufacturing,
Solvent recovery
facility
Soil (100,000 cy)
VOCs
Predesign;
Schedule
pending
completion of
negotiation
In negotiation
Uayde Hartwick
312-886-7067
5
Enviro. Conservation
and Chemical (ROD
Amendment), IN
(06/07/91)
SoiI vapor
extraction with
air flushing
Industrial
landfill,
Municipal water
supply
Soil (quantity
unknown)
VOCs (Toluene,
Ethylbenzene,
Xylene), SVOCs
(Dichlorobenzene,
Phenol), Organics
(BNAs)
In design
PRP lead/Federal
oversight
Karen VendI
312-886-4739
5
Fisher Calo Chem, IN
(08/07/90)
Soil vapor
extraction
Municipal water
supply
Soil (29,500 cy)
VOCs (PCE, DCA,
TCA)
In design;
Design
completion
planned Fall
1993
PRP lead/Federal
oversight;
Connestoga
Rovers - Prime
Jeff Gore
312-886-6552
1-39
-------
Table 1-1
Remedial Actions: Site-specific Information By Innovative Treatment Technology Through FY 1992 June 1993
Soil Vapor Extraction (continued)
Region
Site, Name, State,
(ROD Date)
Specific
Technology
Site Description
Hedia (Quantity)
Key Contaminants
Treated
Status#
Lead Agency and
Treatment
Contractor (if
available)
Contacts/Phone
5
HIDCO I, IN
(06/30/89)
Soil vapor
extraction
Industrial
landfill
Soil (10,000 cy)
VOCs (TCE,
Dichloromethane,
Chlorobenzene,
2-Butanone, BTX),
SVOCs (Phenols),
PAHs
Predesign; PD
Completion
planned Winter
1994
PRP lead/Federal
oversight; ERH
Northcentral-
prime
Richard Boice
312-886-4740
5
Main Street Uell
Field, IN (03/29/91)
Soil vapor
extraction with
air flushing
Solvent recovery
facility, Water
Supply
Contamination from
many sources
Soil (22,000 cy)
VOCs (TCE)
In design;
East site (60%
design
completion by
June 1, 1993)/
West site (95
% design in
progress)
PRP lead/Federal
oversight
Deborah Orr
312-886-7576
5
MIDCO II, IN
(06/30/89)
Soil vapor
extraction
Drum storage/
disposal
Soil (12,200 cy)
VOCs (Methylene
chloride, TCE,
2-Butanone,
Toluene)
Predesign; PD
Completion
planned Winter
1994;
Bench-scale
treatability
study is
underway.
PRP lead/Federal
oversight; ERH
Northwest-prime
Rich Boice
312-886-4740
5
Seymour Recycling, IN
(09/30/87)
See also
Bioremediation (In
Situ)
Soil vapor
extraction (No
emissions
treatment)
Chemical waste
management and
incineration
Soil (200,000 cy)
VOCs (TCA, Carbon
tetrachloride,
PCE, TCE, Vinyl
chloride, Benzene)
Operational;
Completion
planned Spring
1994
PRP lead/Federal
oversight;
Canonie
Engineering
(installation),
Geraghty &
Miller
(operation)
Jeff Gore
312-886-6552
1-40
-------
laoie i-i
Remedial Actions; Site-specific Information By Innovative Treatment Technology Through FY 1992
June 199:
Soil Vapor Extraction (continued)
Region
Site Name, State,
(ROD Date)
Specific
Technology
Site Description
Media (Quantity)
Key Contaminants
Treated
Status#
Lead Agency and
Treatment
Contractor (If
aval table)
Contacts/Phone
5
Wayne Uaste
Reclamation, IN
(03/30/90)
Soil vapor
extraction with
air flushing
Hunicipal
landfill, Oil
reclamation
Soil (300,000 cy)
VOCs (TCE, DCE,
Vinyl chloride,
BTEX)
In design;
Design
completion
planned Winter
1993; 30%
design
approved in
March 1993
PRP lead/Federal
oversight;
Warzyn, Inc.
Beverly Kush
312-886-6945
Duane Keaton
312-886-6399
5
Chen Central, MI
(09/30/91)
Soil vapor
extraction
{vapor treatment
through carbon)
Chemical packaging
and distribution
Soil (6,200 cy)
VOCs (DCE, TCE,
TCA, BTEX), SVOCs
(Naphthalene,
2-methyl
naphthalene)
In design;
Design
completion
planned Simmer
1994;
Predesign
completed in
May 1993
PRP lead/Federal
oversight; WW
Engineering &
Science
Colleen Hart
312-353-8752
5
Clare Water Supply,
HI (09/16/92)
Soil vapor
extraction with
air flushing air
flushing with
vertical wells
Industrial area
with above/below
ground tanks--
multisource
groundwater site
Soil (54,800 cy)
VOCs {TCE, DCE,
Vinyl chloride,
BTEX)
Predesign;
Schedule
pending
negotiation
completion
In negotiation;
Dames & Moore -
Prime
Jon Peterson
312-353-1264
5
Electro-Voice, OU 1,
HI (06/23/92)
Soil vapor
extraction
Audio equipment
manufacturer
Soil (2,100 cy)
VOCs (TCE, PCE,
Vinyl chloride),
PAHs
Predesign; PD
Completion
planned Winter
1993
PRP lead/Federal
oversight;
Geraghty &
Miller
Beth Reiner
312-886-4783
5
Kysor Industrial*, HI
(09/29/89)
Soil vapor
extraction
Hachine shops.
Truck parts
manufacturing
Soil (13,200 cy)
VOCs (TCE, Xylene,
Toluene,
Ethylbenzene)
In design;
Design
completion
planned Sumner
1993
PRP lead/Federal
oversight
Mary L.
Gustafson
312-886-6144
Julie
Zacutansky
312-353-9660
1-41
-------
Table 1-1
Remedial Actions: Site-specific Information By Innovative Treatment Technology Through FY 1992 June 199J
Soil Vapor Extraction (continued)
Region
Site Name, State,
(ROD Date)
Specific
Technology
Site Description
Media (Quantity)
Key Contaminants
Treated
Status#
Lead Agency and
Treatment
Contractor (if
[ available)
Contacts/Phone
5
Peerless Plating, HI
(09/21/92)
Soil vapor
extraction with
horizontal uells
Electroplating
Soil (6,500 cy)
VOCs (1,2-DCE,
TCE, Benzene,
Ethylbenzene)
Predesign; PD
Completion
planned Fall
1993
Federal
lead/Fund
Financed; PRC
Environmental
Management, Inc.
Tom Pay
312-886-5991
5
Springfield Township
Durp, HI (09/29/90)
Soil vapor
extraction
Industrial
landfill
Soil (100,000 cy)
VOCs (TCE, TCA,
Chlorobenzene,
Toluene)
Predesign; PD
Completion
planned Fall
1992; 60 %
design on
ground water,
60 X design on
soil vapor
extraction
PRP lead/Federal
oversight
Mary Lou Martin
312-353-7446
5
Sturgis Municipal
Uell Field, MI
(09/30/91)
Soil vapor
extraction with
air flushing
Solvent recovery
facility
Soil (quantity
unknown)
VOCs (TCE, PCE,
TCA)
Predesign; PD
Completion
planned 1993
Federal
lead/Fund
Financed
Terese Van
Donsel
312-353-6564
Steve Padovani-
312-353-6755
5
ThermoChem, Inc. OU
1, HI (09/30/91)
Soil vapor
extraction with
air flushing;
May include
biological
enhancement
Municipal water
supply
Soil (50,000 cy)
VOCs (PCE, TCE,
Ethylbenzene,
Xylene)
Predesign; PD
Completion
planned Winter
1993; A
schedule is
being
negotiated
with PRPs.
Federal
lead/Fund
Financed
Jim Hahnenberg
312-353-4213
5
Verona Well Field
(Thomas
Solvent/Raymond
Road)*, MI (08/12/85)
Soil vapor
extraction
(attempted
Nitrogen
sparging during
part of
operation)
Municipal water
supply
Soil (35,000 cy)
VOCs
(D i chIoromethane.
Chloroform, Carbon
tetrachloride,
BTEX, Vinyl
chloride), SVOCs
(Napthalene)
Completed;
Spring 1992
Federal
lead/Fund
Financed; Terra
Vac
(subcontractor
to CH2H Hill)
Margaret
Guerriero
312-886-0399
Bill Haubal
(temporary
contact)
1-42
-------
laoie 1-1
Remedial Actions: Site-specific Information By Innovative Treatment Technology Through FY 1992
June 1993
Soil Vapor Extraction (continued)
Region
Site Name, State,
(ROD Date)
Specific
Technology
Site Description
Media (Quantity)
Key Contaminants
Treated
Status#
Lead Agency and
Treatment
Contractor (if
available)
Contacts/Phone
5
Verona Well Field, OU
2, MI (06/28/915
Soil vapor
extraction
Augmentation
with air
flushing is
being considered
Machine shops,
Municipal water
supply
Soil (30,000 cy)
VOCs (PCE, TCA,
Toluene)
Operational;
PRP conducting
air sparging
pilot study
for treating
saturated
soils. Study
to start 9/93
PRP lead/Federal
oversight;
Geraghty &
Miller (Prime),
Maumee Bay
(Remedial
subcontractor)
Margaret
Guierro
312-886-0399
5
Long Prairie
Groundwater
Contamination, MM
(06/27/88)
Soil vapor
extraction with
air flushing
followed by SAC
for off-gas
Dry cleaners
Soil (3,600 cy)
VOCs (DCE, PCE,
TCE, Vinyl
chloride)
Design
completed but
not installed;
Completion
planned Spring
1994
State lead/Fund
Financed
Jan Bartlett
312-886-5438
Maureen Johnson
(MM)
612-296-7353
5
Miami County
Incinerator, OH
(06/30/89)
Soil vapor
extraction with
air flushing
Treatment of
off-gas
determined in
design
Municipal
landfill, Surface
impoundment
Soil (98,000 cy).
Solids (quantity
unknown)
VOCs (TCE, PCE,
Toluene)
In design;
Design
completion
planned Spring
1995; Design
started in
April 1993.
PRP lead/Federal
oversight;
Connestogo
Roveis-Prime
Anthony Rutter
312-886-8961
5
Pristine (ROD
Amendment)*, OH
(03/30/90)
Soil vapor
extraction with
horizontal wells
Industrial
landfill. Drum
storage/disposal
Soil (19,400 cy)
VOCs (Chloroform,
OCA, PCE, TCE,
Benzene), SVOCs
(Phenol)
In design;
Design
completion
planned Spring
1994; Pilot
study
completed
PRP lead/Federal
oversight;
Hydregeo-chem
Thomas Alcamo
312-886-7278
5
Zanesville Veil
Field, OH (09/30/91)
See also Soil Washing
Soil vapor
extraction with
horizontal wells
followed by
excavation and
soil washing for
metals
Solvent recovery
facility, Auto
parts
manufacturing
Soil (36,000 cy)
VOCs (TCE, DCE)
Predesign; PD
Completion
planned Fall
1993
PRP lead/Federal
oversight;
Geraghty &
Miller - Prime
Dave Wilson
312-886-1476
1-43
-------
Table 1-1
Remedial Actions: Site-specific Information By Innovative Treatment Technology Through FY 1992 June 1993
SoH Vapor Extraction (continued)
Region
Site Name, State,
(ROD Date)
Specific
Technology
Site Description
Media (Quantity)
Key Contaminants
Treated
Statin#
Lead Agency and
Treatment
Contractor (if
available)
Contacts/Phone
5
City Disposal
Corporation Landfill,
WI (09/28/92)
Soil vapor
extraction
Industrial
landfill,
Municipal landfill
Soil (quantity
unknown)
VOCs
(Tetrahydrofuran)
Predesign; PD
Completion
planned Spring
1994
PRP lead/Federal
oversight; Rust
Environmental -
Prime
Russ Hart
312-886-4841
Mike Schmoller
(WDNR)
608-275-3303
5
Hagen Farm, WI
(09/17/90)
Soil vapor
extraction with
air flushing
Industrial and
Municipal Haste
Disposal
Soil (67,650 cy)
VOCs (Vinyl
chloride,
2-Butanone, BTEX),
Dioxins
(Tetrahydrofuran)
In design;
Design
completion
planned Simmer
1993; Pilot
test completed
Fall 1992
PRP lead/Federal
oversight;
Warzyn-Prime
Steve Padovani
312-353-6755
Don DiGulim
(RSKERL)
405-332-8800
5
Muskego Sanitary
Landfill, Interim
Action OU 1, WI
(06/12/92)
Soil vapor
extraction
Industrial
landfill.
Municipal landfill
Soil (24,200 cy)
VOCs (Vinyl
chloride, 1,2-DCA,
Methylene
chloride, BTEX)
In design;
Design
completion
planned Sunnier
1993;
Operation
scheduled to
start in
Suniier 1993
PRP lead/Federal
oversight; Rust
- Design
Bill Haubold
312-353-6261
5
Wausau Groundwater
Contamination, UI
(09/29/89)
Soil vapor
extraction with
air flushing
Soil vapor
extraction
Machine shops,
Bulk chemical
distribution
Soil (1,300 cy)
VOCs (TCE, DCE,
PCE)
Design
completed but
not installed;
Installation
to take place
between June
and September
1993
PRP lead/Federal
oversight;
Hydrogeo-Chem
(sub to
Conestoga-Rovers
& Associates)
Margaret
Guerriero
312-886-0399
6
Prewitt Abandoned
Refinery, MM
(09/30/92)
See also
Bioremediation (Ex
Situ), Other
Technologies
Soil vapor
extraction With
Air Sparging
Crude oil refinery
Soil (quantity
unknown)
Organic® (NAPLs)
Predesign
PRP lead/Federal
oversight
Monica
Chapa-Smith
214-655-6780
1-44
-------
Remedial Actions: Site-specific Information By Innovative Treatment Technology Through FY 1992
Soil Vapor Extraction (continued)
June 199:
Region
Site Name, State,
(ROD Date)
Specific
Technology
Site Description
Media (Quantity)
Key Contaminants
Treated
Status#
Lead Agency and
Treatment
Contractor (if
available)
I
Contacts/Phone
6
South Valley*, NM
(09/30/88)
Soil vapor
extraction
Aircraft Engine
Manufacturing.
Soil (quantity
unknown)
VOCs (PCE, TCE,
DCE, TCA)
Design
completed but
not installed;
Completion
planned Uinter
1993;
Installed
Jan./March
1993 for
north/south
end. Pilot
tests
completed Nov.
1992.
PRP lead/Federal
oversight;
Canonie
Environmental
Services
Bert Gorrod
214-655-6779
6
Tinker AFB (Soldier
Creek Bldg. 3001), OK
(08/16/90)
Soil vapor
extraction
Maintenance
Facility for
Aircraft
Soil (quantity
unknown)
VOCs (BTEX)
In design;
Data on
viability of
SVE for the
heavy fuel oil
contamination
being
re-evaluated.
Decision in
Fall 1993
Air Force
lead/Federal
Oversight
Susan Webster
214-655-6784
Major Richard
Ashworth (USAF)
405-734-3058
6
Petro-Chemical
Systems, Inc., OU 2,
TX (09/06/91)
See also Other
Technologies
Soil vapor
extraction with
air flushing and
air sparging of
ground water
Petroleum refining
and reuse
Soil (300,000 cy)
VOCs (BTEX), SVOCs
(Naphthalene)
Predesign
Federal
lead/Fund
Financed
Chris Villareal
214-655-6758
1-45
-------
Table 1-1
Remedial Actions: Site-specific Information By Innovative Treatment Technology Through FY 1992 June 1992
Soil Vapor Extraction (continued)
t-r-
Region
Site Name, state,
(ROD Date)
Specific
Technology
Site Description
Media (Quantity)
Key Contaminants
Treated
Status#
Lead Agency and
Treatment
Contractor (if
available)
Contacts/Phone
7
Coleman Operable Unit
29th and Head, ICS
(09/29/92)
Soil vapor
extraction
Formerly vehicle
manufacturing,
currently heating,
air conditioning
equipment
manufacturing
Soil (2,000,000
cy)
VOCs (TCE,
1,1,1-TCA, DCE,
Vinyl chloride,
Toluene)
Predesign; PD
Completion
planned Fall
1993; Soil
vapor system
already in
place. ROD
calls for
expansion of
the system
PRP lead/Federal
oversight;
Groundwater
Technologies,
Inc.
Ken Rapplean
913-551-7769
7
Hastings GU
Contamination
(Colorado Ave)*, NE
(09/28/88)
Soil vapor
extraction
Industrial Metal
Finishing/CIearn" ng
Soil (42,700 cy)
VOCs (PCE, TCE,
DCE, TCA)
In design;
Design
completion
planned Fall
1993
PRP lead/Federal
oversight; ENSR
- Design
Contractor
Darrel
Sonmerhauser
913-551-7711
Richard
Schlenker (NE)
402-471-3388
7
Hastings GU
Contamination
(Far-Mar Co.)*, NE
(09/30/88)
Soil vapor
extraction
Former Grain
Storage Area
(Fumigants)
Soil (quantity
unknown)
VOCs (Carbon
tetrachloride,
Ethylene
dibromide)
In design;
Design
completion
planned Summer
1993
PRP lead/Federal
oversight; Burns
& McDonald
Susan Hoff
913-551-7786
7
Hastings GW
Contamination, Well
No. 3*, NE (09/26/89)
Soil vapor
extraction
Former Grain
Storage Area
(Fumigants)
Soil (quantity
unknown)
VOCs (Carbon
tetrachloride.
Chloroform)
Operational;
Completion
planned Fall
1993; SVE
began
operation on
June 1, 1992.
The State will
take over the
project in
FAll 1993 if
needed.
Federal
lead/Fund
Financed;
Morrison
Knudsen, EPA
contractor
Diane Easley
913-551-7797
Steve Roe
(Morrison
Knudsen)
303-793-5054
Richard
Schlenker (NE)
402-471-3388
1-46
-------
Remedial Actions: Site-specific Information By Innovative Treatment Technology Through FY 1992
Soil Vapor Extraction (continued)
June 1993
Region
Site Name, State,
(ROD Date)
Specific
technology
Site Description
Media (Quantity)
Key Contaminants
Treated
Status#
lead Agency and
Treatment
Contractor (if
avallable)
Contacts/Phone
7
Lindsay
Manufacturing, NE
(09/28/90)
Soil vapor
extraction with
air
Electroplating,
Galvanized pipes
for irrigation
systems
Soil (quantity
unknown)
VOCs (DCA, DCE,
TCE, PCE)
In design;
Design
completion
planned Fall
1993
PRP lead/Federal
oversight; Dames
& Moore
Cecelia Tapla
913-551-7733
7
Waverly Groundwater
Contamination, NE
(09/26/90)
Soil vapor
extraction
Grain Storage
(Fumigants)
Soil (160,000 cy)
VOCs (Carbon
tetrachloride.
Chloroform)
Operational;
Completion
planned 2001;
This project
began in
February,
1988.
PRP lead/Federal
oversight
Jeff
Weatherford
913-551-7695
Mary Hansen
(Argonne
National Lab)
708-252-4938
8
Chemical Sales
Company, 0U 1*, CO
(06/27/91)
Soil vapor
extraction with
air flushing
will recirculate
treated
emissions
Chemical sales and
distribution,
spillage at tank
farm
Soil (360,000 cy)
VOCs (PCE, TCE)
In design;
Des i gn
completion
planned Winter
1993
PRP lead/Federal
oversight; ENSR
Jim Berkley
303-293-1817
8
Martin Marietta
(Denver Aerospace),
CO (09/24/90)
See also Thermal
Desorption
Soil vapor
extraction
Aerospace
Equipment
Manufacturer -
Bulk storage
facility and
industrial
landfill
Soil (quantity
unknown)
VOCs (TCE)
In design;
Design
completion
planned Fall
1993
PRP/State
oversite under
RCRA; Geraghty &
Miller
George Dancik
303-293-1506
Susan Chaki
303-331-4832
8
Rocky Flats ou 2,
Interim Remedial
Action Plan, CO
(08/10/92)
Soil vapor
extraction
Former nuclear
weapons research
and development,
production, and
plutonium
reprocessing
complex
Soil (quantity
unknown)
VOCs (TCE, PCE,
Carbon
tetrachloride)
Predesign;
Pilot-scale is
scheduled to
start
operation in
December 1993
DOE Lead/Federal
Oversight DOE
ERP; Woodward
Clyde, Roy
Weston, Layne
Environmental
Bill Frazier
303-294-1081
Scott Grace
(Rocky Flats)
303-966-7199
1-47
-------
Table 1-1
Remedial Actions: Site-specific Information By Innovative Treatment Technology Through FY 1992 June 1993
Soil Vapor Extraction (continued)
Region
Site Name, State,
(ROD Date)
Specific
Technology
Site Description
Hedia (Quantity)
Key Contaminants
Treated
Status#
Lead Agency and
Treatment
Contractor (if
available)
Contacts/Phone
8
Rocky Mountain
Arsenal OU 18,
interim response, CO
(02/26/90)
Soil vapor
extraction
Motor Pool Area
Soil (100 ft
radius down to 60
ft deep;
approximately
70,000 cy)
VOCs (TCE)
Completed;
March 1992
U. S. Army (PRP)
lead; Roy
Weston, Ebasco,
Harding Lawson,
Woodward Clyde
Stacey Eriksen
303-294-1083
8
Sand Creek Industrial
OU 1*, CO (09/29/89)
SoiI vapor
extraction
Pesticide
manufacturi ng/use
/storage, Refinery
Soil (38,000 cy)
VOCs (TCE, PCE,
Methylene
chloride,
Chloroform)
Operational;
Completion
planned Fall
1994
Federal
lead/Fund
Financed; OHM
Erna Acheson
303-294-1971
9
Hassayampa Landfill,
AZ (08/15/92)
Soil vapor
extraction
Municipal Landfill
Soil (quantity
unknown)
VOCs (1,1-DCE,
1,1,1-TCA,
1,2-DCE, 1,1-DCA,
TCE)
In design;
Pi lot-scale
system is in
operation
PRP lead/Federal
oversight;
Conestoga Rovers
Tom Dunkleman
415-744-2395
9
Indian Bend Wash,
South Area, OU 1, AZ
(09/12/91)
Soil vapor
extraction May
vary technology
at different
uni ts
Dry cleaners,
Electroplating,
Industrial
landfi11,
Municipal landfill
Soil (quantity
unknown)
VOCs (PCE, TCE,
TCA)
Predesign;
Pilot project
under the SACM
initiative,
schedules for
different
units may
vary.
PRP lead/Federal
•oversight; mixed
funding
Jeff Dhont
415-744-2363
9
Mesa Area Groundwater
Contamination, AZ
(09/27/91)
Soil vapor
extraction
Semiconductor
manufacturing
Soil (quantity
unknown)
VOCs (TCE, PCE,
1,1-DCE)
Operational
PRP lead/State
oversight
Richard Oln
(AZ)
602-207-4176
9
Motorola 52nd Street,
AZ (09/30/88)
SoiI vapor
extraction
Manufacturing
FaciIi ty
Soil (quantity
unknown)
VOCs (TCA, TCE,
DCE, PCE, Carbon
tetrachloride,
Ethylbenzene)
Predesign; A
pi lot system
is operational
but the full
scale
technology is
still being
evaluated.
PRP lead/State
oversight; Dames
and Moore
Mike Montgomery
415-744-2394
Jeff Kulon (AZ)
602-207-4181
Hotline
602-207-4360
-------
Remedial Actions: Site-specific Information By Innovative Treatment Technology Through FY 1992 June 1993
Soil Vapor Extraction (continued)
Region
Site Name, State,
(ROD Date)
Specific
Technology
Site Description
Media (Quantity)
Key Contaminants
Treated
Status#
Lead Agency and
Treatment
Contractor (if
available)
Contacts/Phone
9
Phoenix-Goodyear
Airport Area (North &
South Fac), AZ
(09/26/89)
Soil vapor
extraction
Defense related
manufacturing
Soil (271,200 cy)
VOCs (DCE, TCE,
MEK, Acetone)
Operational
PRP lead/Federal
oversight;
Metcalf & Eddy -
South Area,
Malcome Pirnie -
North Area
Craig Cooper
415-744-2370
9
Falrchild
Semiconductor (San
Jose)*, CA (03/20/89)
Soil vapor
extraction with
air flushing
Semiconductor
manufacturing
Soil <1,933,488
cy)
VOCs (TCA,
1,1-DCE, Freon)
Completed;
Fall 1990;
Remedial
efforts will
be reevaluated
in January
1994
PRP lead/State
oversight;
Canonie
Engineering
Helen McKinley
510-744-2236
Steve Hill (CA)
510-286-0433
9
Fairchild
Semi conductor/MTV-1*,
CA (06/09/89)
Soil vapor
extraction
Semi conductor
manufacture and
metal finisher
Soil (quantity
unknown)
VOCs (TCE, PCE,
Vinyl chloride,
OCA, DCE, Freon),
SVOCs (Phenol)
In design;
Design
completion
planned 1993
PRP lead/Federal
oversight
Kelly McCarthy
415-744-2236
9
Fairchild
Semi conductor/MTV-11*
, CA (06/30/89)
Soil vapor
extraction
Semi conductor
manufacturing,
Metal Finishing
Facility
Soil (50,000 cy?
VOCs (TCE, PCE,
Vinyl chloride,
OCA, DCE, Freon),
SVOCs (Phenol)
In design;
Design
completion
planned 1993
PRP lead/Federal
oversight;
Canonie
Engineering
Kelly McCarthy
415-744-2236
9
IBM (San Jose)*, CA
(12/15/88)
Soil vapor
extraction
Computer
Manufacture
Soi t (24,000 cy)
VOCs (TCA,
Acetone, Freon,
Isopropyl Alcohol,
Xylenes)
Operational;
Completion
planned Spring
2001
PRP lead/State
oversight; Terra
Vac
Helen McKinley
415-744-2236
Steve Morris
(CA)
510-286-0304
9
Intel, Mountain
View*, CA (06/09/89)
Soil vapor
extraction
Semiconductor
manufacturing,
Metal Refinishing
Facility Aircraft
Maintenance
Soil (3,000 cy)
VOCs (TCE, PCE,
Vinyl chloride,
DCA, DCE, Freon),
SVOCs (Phenol)
In design;
Design
completion
planned 1993
PRP lead/Federal
oversight; Weiss
Associates
Kelly McCarthy
415-744-2236
1-49
-------
Table 1-1
Remedial Actions: Site-specific Information By Innovative Treatment Technology Through FY 1992 June 1993
Sofl Vapor Extraction (continued!
Region
Site Name, State,
CROO Date)
Specific
Technology
Site Description
Media (Quantity)
Key Contaminants
Treated
Status#
lead Agency and
Treatment
Contractor (if
available)
Contacts/Phone
9
Intersil/Siemens, CA
(09/27/90)
Soil vapor
extraction
Semiconductor
manufacturing
Soil (quantity
unknown)
VOCs (TCE,
1,1,1-TCA, Xylene)
Operational
State lead/Fund
Financed;
Levine-Fricke
Marie Lacey
415-744-2234
Steve Horse
(CA)
510-286-0304
Steve Hill (CA)
510-286-0433
9
Lawrence Livermore
National Laboratory,
CA (07/15/92)
Soil vapor
extraction
Research and
Development
faciIi ty
Soil (quantity
unknown}
VOCs (Fuel
hydrocarbons)
Predesign
DOE lead/Federal
oversight
Mike Gill
415-744-2383
9
Monolithic
Memories/AMD -
Arques, Subunit 2, CA
(09/11/91)
Soil vapor
extraction
Semi conductor
manufacturing
Soil (3,400 cy)
VOCs (PCE, TCE,
TCA), PAHs
Operational;
Started
operation in
Spring 1993
State lead/Fund
Financed;
Pacific
Environmental
Group
Cecil Felix
(CA)
510-464-1249
9
National
Semiconductor
(Monolithic
Memories), CA
(09/11/91)
Soil vapor
extraction
Semiconductor
manufacturing
Soil (quantity
unknown)
VOCs (PCE, DCE,
Toluene,
Ethylbenzene,
Xylene), SVOCs
Operational;
Completion
planned Spring
1996
State lead/Fund
Financed;
Harding Lawson &
Associates
Cecil Felix
(CA)
510-286-1249
9
Pacific Coast
Pipeline, CA
(03/31/92)
Soil vapor
extraction
Petroleun refining
and reuse;
petroleum pumping
station
Soil (quantity
unknown)
VOCs (Methlyene
chloride, DCA,
Benzene, Toluene,
Ethylbenzene)
In design
PRP lead/Federal
oversight
Mike Montgomery
415-744-2403
9
Purity Oil Sales OU
2, CA (09/30/92)
Soil vapor
extraction
Petroleum refining
arid reuse
Soil (64,000 cy)
VOCs (TCE, PCE,
Chlorobenzene,
BTEX)
Predesign
Federal
lead/Fund
Financed
Martin
Hausladen
415-744-2246
9
Raytheon, Kountain
View*, CA (06/09/89)
Soil vapor
extraction
Semiconductor
manufacturing,
Metal Refinishing
and Aircraft
Maintenance
Soil (15,000 cy)
VOCs (TCE, PCE,
Vinyl chloride,
DCA, DCE, Freon),
SVOCs (Phenol)
In design;
Design
completion
planned 1993
PRP lead/Federal
oversight;
Golder &
Associates
Kelly McCarthy
415-744-2236
-------
Remedial Actions: Site-specific Information By Innovative Treatment Technology Through FY 1992
Soil Vapor Extraction (continued)
June 195
Region
Site.Name, State,
(ROD Date}
Specific
Technology
Site Description
Media (Quantity)
Key Contaminants
Treated
Status#
Lead Agency and
Treatment
Contractor (if
available)
Contacts/Phone
9
Sacramento Array
Depot, Tank 2 OU, CA
(12/09/91)
Soil vapor
extraction with
air flushing
Solvent storage
tank at an Army
Depot
Soil (150 cy)
VOCs (PCE,
Ethylbenzene and
Total Xylenes)
Completed;
Operational
from 11/91 to
4/93
Army (USACE)/DoD
Financed - IRP
Program; Terra
Vac
Marlin Mezqui ta
415-744-2393
George Siller
(USACE,
Sacramento)
916-557-7418
Dan Oburn
(Sacramento
Army Depot)
916-388-4144
9
Signetics (AMD 901),
TRW OU, CA (09/11/91)
Soil vapor
extraction
Semiconductor
manufacturing
Soil (8,000 cy)
VOCs (TCE, DCE,
DCA)
Being
installed;
Installation
completion
planned Sumter
1993;
Operational by
end of Simmer
1993
PRP lead/State
oversight; Weiss
& Associates
Joe Healy
415-744-2231
Kevin Craves
(CA)
510-286-0425
9
Signetics (Advanced
Micro Devices 901),
CA (09/11/91)
Soil vapor
extraction
Semiconductor
manufacturing
Soil (32,000 cy)
VOCs (TCE, DCE,
DCA, TCA)
Operational;
Although the
ROD was signed
in FY 91, the
PRP has
operated the
remedy for
several years
PRP lead/State
oversight; M-Con
Associates,
Engineering-
Science
Joe Healy
415-744-2231
Kevin Graves
(CA)
510-286-0435
9
Solvent Service, CA
(09/27/90)
Soil vapor
extraction with
heat enhancement
Municipal water
supply
Soil (quantity
unknown)
VOCs (TCA,
Acetone,
Ethylbenzene,
Xylene), SVOCs
(Dichlorobenzene)
Operational
In negotiation;
David Keith Todd
Engineers
Marie lacey
415-744-2234
Steve Morse
(CA)
510-286-0104
Kevin Graves
(CA)
510-286-0435
1-51
-------
Table 1-1
Remedial Actions: Site-specific Information By Innovative Treatment Technology Through FY 1992 June 199
Soil Vapor Extraction (continued)
Region
Site Name, State,
(ROD Date)
Specific
Technology
Site Description
Media (Quantity)
Key Contaminants
Treated
Status#
Lead Agency and
Treatment
Contractor (if
available)
Contacts/Phone
9
Spectra Physics, OU
1, CA (03/22/91)
Soil vapor
extraction with
horizontal wells
Semiconductor
manufacturing,
Laser
manufacturing
Soil (7,200 cy)
VOCs (TCE)
Operational;
Completion
planned Winter
1997
PRP lead/State
oversight;
Levine - Fricke
Sean Hogan
415-744-2233
Steve Hill (CA)
510-286-4833
9
Teledyne
Semiconductors, CA
(03/22/91)
Soil vapor
extraction with
horizontal wells
Semiconductor
manufacturing
Soil (quantity
unknown)
VOCs (TCE)
Operational;
Completion
planned Winter
1997
PRP lead/State
oversight;
Levine Fricke
Sean Hogan
415-744-2233
Carla Dube
510-286-1041
9
Van Waters and
Rogers, CA (09/30/91)
Soil vapor
extraction
Chemical packaging
facility
Soil (quantity
unknown)
VOCs (PCE, TCE,
TCA)
Operational
PRP lead/State
oversight; Van
Waters and
Rogers
Marie Lacey
415-744-2234
Susan Gladstone
(CA)
510-286-0840 •
9
Watkins-Johnson*, CA
(06/29/90)
Soil vapor
extraction
Semiconductor
manufacturing
Soil (quantity
unknown)
VOCs (DCE, TCA,
TCE)
In design;
Design
completion
planned Sumter
1993
PRP lead/Federal
oversight;
Watkins
Kay Lawrence
415-744-2289
10
Eielson Air Force
Base*, AK (09/29/92)
See also
Bioremediation (In
Situ)
Soil vapor
extraction
Tactical air
support
installation
Soil (quantity
unknown)
Floating Petroleum
Products (VOCs,
SVOCs, and
Petroleum
Hydrocarbons),
BTEX, TPH-JP-4,
Diesel
In design;
Design
completion
planned Summer
1993
Federal Facility
Lead/Funded DERA
EA Engineering
Mary Jane
Nearman
206-553-6642
Capt. Max Gandy
907-377-4361
Rielle Markey
907-451-2117
10
Commencement Bay/S.
Tacoma Channel/Hell
12A*, HA (05/03/85)
Soil vapor
extraction with
air flushing
Municipal Mater
supply, Haste oil
and solvent
reclamation; paint
and lacquer
thinner
manufacturing
Soil (100,000 cy)
VOCs (PCE, TCE,
TCA)
Operational;
Completion
planned Fall
1998
Federal
lead/Fund
Financed; AUD
Technologies,
Inc.
Kevin Rochlin
206-553-2106
1-52
-------
Remedial Actions: Site-specific Information By Innovative Treatment Technology Through FY 1992 June 199
Soil Washing
Region
Site Name, State,
{ROD Date)
Specific
Technology
Site Description
Media (Quantity)
Key Contaminants
Treated :
Status#
Lead Agency
and Treatment
Contractor (if
available)
Contacts/Phone
i 2
Ewan Property*, NJ
(09/29/89)
See also Solvent
Extraction
Using water only
preceded by
solvent
extraction
Industrial waste
dumping
Soil (22,000 cy)
Metals (Chromium,
Lead, Copper,
Barium)
Predesign; PD
Completion
planned 1995;
Start date
contingent
upon progress
in OU 1,
Completion
planned 1995.
In negotiation
Dave Rosoff
212-264-5397
2
King of Prussia, NJ
(09/28/90)
Using Mater with
washing agents
as an additive
residual sludges
to be land
disposed
Waste processing
facility
Soil (20,000 cy).
Sludge (quantity
unknown),
Sediments
(quantity
unknown)
Metals (Chromium,
Copper, Nickel),
DDT/DDD/DDE,
Hexachloro-
benzene,
Dioxin (2,3,7,8),
TCDD
Design
completed but
not installed;
Completion
planned Summer
1993
PRP
lead/Federal
oversight;
Alternative
Remedial
Technologies,
Inc.
Gary
Adamkiewici
212-264-7592
2
Myers Property, MJ
(09/28/90)
See also
Dechlorination
Soil washing
coupled with
dechlorination
Pesticide
manufacturing/use
/storage
Soil (49,000 cy),
Sediments (1,000
cy)
Metals (Cadmium,
Lead, Arsenic,
Copper)
In design;
Design
completion
planned Winter
1994;
Treatability
studies
underway
PRP
lead/Federal
oversight;
Metcalf & Eddy
John Prince
212-264-1213
2
Vineland Chemical, OU
1 and OU 2, NJ
(09/29/89)
See also In situ
Flushing
Soil Washing
Pesticide
manufactur i ng/use
/storage
Soil (62,000 cy)
Metals (Arsenic)
In design;
Design
completion
planned 1993
Federal
lead/Fund
Financed EBASCO
Design
Matthew
Westgate
212-264-3406
Steve Hadel
(USACE • Kansas
City)
816-426-5221
2
GE Wiring Devices, PR
(09/30/88)
Using water with
Potassium Iodide
KI2 solution as
an additive
Wiring services
facility
Soil (5,500 cy),
Sludge (quantity
unknown)
Metals (Mercury)
In design;
Design
completion
planned Spring
1994
PRP
lead/Federal
oversight
Caroline Kuan
212-264-0151
1-53
-------
Table 1-1
Remedial Actions: Site-specific Information By Innovative Treatment Technology Through FY 1992 June 19
Soil Washing (continued)
Region
Site Name, State,
(ROD Date)
Specific
Technology
Site Description
Hedia (Quantity)
Key Contaminants
Treated
Status#
lead Agency
and Treatment
Contractor (if
available)
Contacts/Phone
4
Cabot Carbon/Koppers,
FL (09/27/90)
See also
Bioremediation (Ex
Situ), Bioremediation
(In Situ)
Soil washing
Followed by
bioremediation
of fines
Wood preserving,
Pine tar and
turpentine
manufacturing
Soil (6,400 cy)
SVOCs (PCP),
PAHs, Metals
(Arsenic,
Chromium)
In design;
Design
completion
planned Fall
1994
PRP
lead/Federal
oversight
McLaren-Hart
Design
Contractor
Martha Berry
404-347-2643
4
Whitehouse Waste Oil
Pits (ROD Amendment
)\ FL (06/16/92)
See also
Bioremediation (Ex
Situ)
Soil Washing
Waste oil recycler
Soil (quantity
unknown), Sludge
(56,930 cy)
VOCs, PCBs,
PAHs.BTEX
In design;
Design
completion
planned Winter
1993
Federal
lead/Fund
Financed
Tony Best
404-347-2643
4
Benfield Industries,
NC (07/31/92)
See also
Bioremediation (Ex
Situ), Bioremediation
(In Situ)
Soil Washing
Bulk chemical
mixing and
repackaging plant.
Soil (4,300 cy)
VOCs, SVOCs,
Inorganics
Predesign
Federal
lead/Fund
Financed;
CDM/F.I.P.
Corporation
John Bornholm
404-347-7791
4
Cape Fear Wood
Preserving, NC
(06/30/89)
See also
Bioremediation (Ex
Situ)
Using water with
sodium hydroxide
or hydrochloric
acid as an
additive may be
followed by s/s
Wood preserving
Soil (24,000 cy)
VOCs (Benzene),
PAHs (Creosote),
Metals (Copper,
Chromium,
Arsenic)
Design
completed but
not installed;
Project on
hold due to a
capacity
assurance
issue.
Federal
lead/Fund
Financed
Jon Bornholm
404-347-7791
5
United Scrap Lead/SIA,
OH (09/30/88)
Soil Washing
Battery recycling
/disposal
Soil (109,000
cy). Solids
{55,000 cy),
Sediments
(quantity
unknown)
Metals (Lead)
In design;
Design
completion
planned Spring
1994
Federal
lead/Fund
Financed
Anita Boseman
312-886-6941
1-54
-------
¦ UWI6 I ~ •
Remedial Actions: Site-specific Information By Innovative Treatment Technology Through FY 1992 June 195
Soil Washing (continued)
Region
Site Name, state,
(ROD Date)
Specific
Technology
Site Description
Media (Quantity)
Key Contaminants
Treated
Status#
Lead Agency
and Treatment
Contractor (if
avai labte)
Contacts/Phone
5
Zanesvllle Well Field,
OH (09/30/91)
See also Soil Vapor
Extraction
Soil washing ex
situ preceded by
soil vapor
extraction
Solvent recovery
facility, Auto
parts
manufacturing
Soil (1,800 cy)
Metals (lead,
Mercury)
Predesign; PD
Completion
planned Fall
1993
PRP
lead/Federal
oversight;
Geraghty &
Miller - Prime
Dave Wilson
312-886-1476
5
Moss-American*, MI
(09/27/90)
See also
Bioremediation (Ex
Situ)
Soil uashing
followed by
slurry phase
bioremediation
of fines
Wood preserving
Soil (80,000 cy)
PAHs
Predesign; PD
Completion
planned 1994;
Bench-scale
study is
underway.
PRP
lead/Federal
oversight;
Weston,
Inc.(prime)/Ber
gmann USA
(subcontractor)
Bonnie Eleder
312-886-4885
6
Arkwood, AR (09/28/90)
Soil washing
(incineration of
residuals)
Wood preserving
Soil (20,400 cy),
Sludge (425 cy)
SVOCs (PCP),
Dioxins, PAHs
In design;
Design
completion
planned Fall
1995
PRP
lead/Federal
oversight; ERH
Southwest
Cynthia Kaleri
214-655-6772
6
ICoppers/Texarkana*, TX
(09/23/88)
See also In situ
Flushing
Using water with
a surfactant as
an additive
Wood preserving
Soil (19,400 cy)
PAHs
(Benzo(a)pyrene,
Creosote),
Organics (NAPLs),
Metals (Arsenic)
Predesign;
Soil washing
project is on
hold while EPA
relocates
community
affected by
the site
PRP
lead/Federal
oversight; ENSR
(Demolition
contractor)
Ursula Lennox
214-655-6743
6
South Cavalcade
Street*, TX (09/26/88)
See also In situ
Flushing
Using water with
surfactants as
an additive
(followed by
incineration of
contaminated
residual
Wood preserving
Soil (11,000 cy)
PAHs
(Benzo(a)pyrene,
Benzo(a)anthracen
e, Chrysene)
In design;
Design
completion
planned Summer
1994
PRP
lead/Federal
oversight
Glenn Celerier
214-655-8523
1-55
-------
Table 1-1
Remedial Actions: She-specific Information By Innovative Treatment Technology Through FY 1992 June 199:
Soii Washing (continued)
Region
Site Name, State,
(ROD Date)
Specific
Technology
Site Description
Media (Quantity)
Key Contaminants
Treated
Status#
Lead Agency
and Treatment
Contractor (If
avalIable)
Contacts/Phone
9
FHC (Fresno)*, CA
(06/28/91)
Soil Hashing
followed by s/s
Pesticide
manufactur i ng/use
/storage
Soil (30,000 cy)
Biocides (DDT,
EDB, Toxaphene,
Chlordane)
Predesign;
Completion of
bench test
scheduled for
December 1993
PRP lead/State
oversight;
Canonie
Engineering
Tom Dunkelman
415-744-2395
Hike Pfister
(FMC)
209-297-3934
9
(Coppers Company, Inc.
(Orovilte Plant), CA
(04/04/90)
See also
Bioremediation (In
Situ)
Soil washing
Method un
determined;
fixation for
metal, 19000 cy
Wood preserving
Soil (200,000 cy)
SVOCs
(Polychlorinated
phenols), Dioxins
In designj
Design
completion
planned Sumter
1993
PRP
lead/Federal
oversight;
Dames & Hoore
Fred Schauffler
415-744-2365
9
Sacramento Army Depot,
Oxidation Lagoons OU,
CA (09/30/92)
Soil Washing
Evaporation ponds
for metal plating
wastewater
Soil (15,000 cy)
Metals (Arsenic,
Cadmium, Lead)
In design;
100% design
completion
planned for
6/93,
Full-scale
operation
scheduled to
start in
September 1991
Army
(USACE)/DoD
Financed - IRP
Program; US PCI
Marl in Mezquita
415-744-2393
George Siller
(USACE)
916-557-7418
Dan Oburn
(Sacramento
Army Depot)
916-388-4344
10
Gould Battery, OR
(03/31/88)
Soil washing
Solids will be
s/s
Battery recycling
/disposal
Soil (11,000 cy),
Solids (90,000
cy)
Metals (Lead)
Operational;
Completion
planned Sumter
1995;
Scheduled to
be in
operation from
fall 1993 to
1995.
PRP
lead/Federal
oversight;
Canonie
Environmental
Jerry Balcom
(Portland
USACE)
503-326-4192
Chip Humphries
(Oregon
operations)
503-326-2678
1-56
-------
I OUIC I - I
Remedial Actions: Site-specific Information By Innovative Treatment Technology Through FY 1992 June 199
Soil Washing (continued)
Region
Site Name, State,
(ROD Date)
Specific
Technology
Site Description
Media (Quantity)
Key Contaminants
Treated
Status#
Lead Agency
and Treatment
Contractor (if
available)
Contacts/Phone
10
Naval Submarine Base,
Bangor Site A, OU 1,
WA (12/06/91)
Soil washing
with UV
oxidation of
ground water
Federal facility,
ordnance
detonation
Soil (7,100 cy)
Explosives (TNT,
RDX, ONT)
Predesign; PD
Completion
planned Winter
1993; Design
will begin
after
completion of
a treatability
study
Navy Lead/DoO
Funded IRP;
OHM,Remediation
Services Corp.
Harry Craig
503-326-3689
Patti Kelly
(DoD)
206-369-5099
Jeff Rodin
206-553-4497
1-57
-------
Table 1-1
Remedial Actions: Site-specific Information By Innovative Treatment Technology Through FY 1992
June 19!
Solvent Extraction
Region
Site Name, State,
(ROD Date)
Specific
Technology
Site Description
Media (Quantity)
Key Contaminants
Treated
Status#
Lead Agency
and Treatment
Contractor (if
avallable)
Contacts/Phone
1
Norwood PCBs, HA
(09/29/89)
Solvent
Extraction
PCB capacitor
manufacturing/
testing
Soil (35,000 cy),
Sediments (5,000
cy)
VOCs (TCE), SVOCs
(T richlorobenzene),
PCBs, PAHs
In design;
Design
completion
planned Spring
1994
Federal
lead/Fund
Financed;
Metcalf & Eddy
- Design
Contractor
Robert
Canciarulo
617-573-5778
1
O'Connor*, HE
(09/27/89)
Solvent
extraction (may
be followed by
s/s for lead)
Salvage and
electrical
transformer
recycling
Soil (23,500 cy),
Sediments
(quantity
unknown)
PCBs, PAHs
In design;
Design
completion
planned Uinter
1995
PRP
lead/Federal
oversight
Ross Gilleland
617-573-5766
2
Euan Property*, NJ
(09/29/89)
See also Soil Washing
Solvent
extraction
(followed by
Soil Washing to
treat
inorganics)
Industrial waste
dumpi ng
Soil (22,000 cy)
VOCs (PCE, TCE,
TCA, Methylene
Chloride, BTX)
Predesign; PD
Completion
planned 1995;
Start date
contingent
upon progress
in 0U-1.
Completion
estimate 1995.
In negotiation
Dave Rosoff
212-264-5397
4
Carolina Transformer,
NC (08/29/91)
Solvent
extraction (may
be followed by
s/s)
Transformer repair
Soil (15,000 cy)
PCBs
In design;
Design
completion
planned Spring
1994
Federal
lead/Fund
Financed
Luise FIores
404-347-7791
6
United Creosoting*, TX
(09/29/89)
Solvent
extraction
(critical fluid
extraction
followed by
incineration of
fluids)
Wood preserving
Soil (67,000 cy)
VOCs, Dioxins
In design;
Design
completion
planned Fall
1993
State lead/Fund
Financed; C.F.
Systems,
proprietor of
propane cf
extraction
Earl G.
Hendrick
214-655-5519
LaReine Pound
(TX)
512-467-7897
1-58
-------
i aoie i -1
Remedial Actions: Site-specific Information By Innovative Treatment Technology Through FY 1992 June 1993
Thermal Desorption
teg Ion
Site Name, State, (R00
Date)
Specific
Technology
Site Description
Media (Quantity)
Key Contaminants
Treated
Status#
Lead Agency
and Treatment
Contractor (if
available)
Contacts/Phone
1
Cannon
Engineering/Bridgewater,
HA (03/31/88)
Thermal aeration
(vapors captured
on carbon)
Chemical waste
storage and
incineration
facility
Soil (11,000 cy)
VOCs (TCE, Vinyl
chloride,
Benzene, Toluene)
Completed;
PRP
lead/Federal
oversight;
Canonie
Engineering
Richard
Goehlert
617-573-5742
1
Re-Solve*, MA <09/24/87)
Thermal
Desorption
Chemical
reclamation
faciIi ty
Soil (22,500 cy)
PCBs
Being
installed;
Operation
planned summer
1993.
PRP
lead/Federal
oversight; ENSR
Joe Lemay
617-573-9622
1
HcKin*, HE (07/22/85)
Thermal aeration
(vapors captured
on carbon)
Industrial
landfill
Soil (11,500 cy)
VOCs (TCE, BTX)
Completed;
PRP
lead/Federal
oversight;
Canonie
Engineering
Sheila Eckman
617-573-5784
I
Union Chemical Co., OU
1, HE (12/27/90)
Low temperature
thermal
treatment
Solvent recovery
facility, Paint
stripping
Soil (10,000 cy)
VOCs (TCE, DCE,
PCE, Xylene)
Design
completed but
not installed;
Being
installed in
summer 1994
PRP
lead/Federal
oversight
Ed Hathaway
617-573-5782
Christopher
Rushton (ME
DEP)
207-287-2651
Ottati & Goss, NK
(01/16/87)
Thermal aeration
Drum storage/
disposal
Soil (16,000 cy)
VOCs (TCE, PCE,
DCA, Benzene)
Completed;
PRP
lead/Federal
oversight;
Canonie
Engineering
Stephen Calder
617-573-9626
:
Industrial Latex, OU 1,
NJ (09/30/92)
Low temperature
thermal
treatment
Manufacturing of
chemical
adhesives and
natural and
synthetic rubber
compounds
Soil (38,000 cy),
Sludge (6 cy).
Solids (quantity
unknown). Soil
<800 gl)
PC8s
Predesign
Federal
lead/Fund
Financed
Paola Pascetta
212-264-9001
Robert McKnight
212-264-1870
1-59
-------
Table 1-1
Remedial Actions: Site-specific Information By Innovative Treatment Technology Through FY 1992 June 1993
Thermal Desorption (continued!
Region
Site Name, State, (ROO
Date)
Specific.
Technology
Site Description
Media (Quantity)
Key Contaminants
Treated
Status#
Lead Agency
and Treatment
Contractor (if
available)
Contacts/Phone
2
lipari Landfill Harsh
Sediment*, NJ (07/11/88)
low temperature
thermal
treatment
Industrial
landfill.
Municipal
landfill
Sediments (60,000
cy)
VOCs, SVOCs
Design
completed but
not Installed;
Completion
planned Summer
1993
In negotiation
Tom Graff
(USACE, Kansas
City)
816-426-2296
2
Metaltec/Aerosystems, QU
1 - Soil Treatment*, NJ
(06/30/86)
Lou temperature
thermal
treatment
(vapors captured
on carbon)
Hetal
Manufacturing
Soil (9,000 cy)
VOCs (TCE)
Being
installed;
Installation
completion
planned Winter
1993; Design
complete;
Contractor
being
procurred
(Bids due June
1993)
Federal
lead/Fund
Financed; Army
Corp of
Engineers
(Contractor)/
vendor unknown
Ron Rusin
212-264-1873
Mark Keast
816-426-5832
(x - 3032)
2
Retch Farms*, NJ
(09/30/88)
Thermal
desorption
(vapors will be
captured on
carbon)
Drum storage/
disposal
Soil (6,000 cy)
VOCs (TCE, PCE,
TCA), SVOCs
(Phthalates)
Predesign
PRP
lead/Federal
oversight
Gary
Adamkiewicz
212-264-7592
2
Waldick Aerospace
Devices*, NJ (09/29/87)
Low temperature
thermal
treatment
(followed by
offsite s/s and
disposal)
Manufacture/
Electroplating of
Plane Parts
Soil (3,000 cy)
VOCs (TCE, PCE)
Operational;
Completion
planned Fall
1993;
Operational
since June
1993
Federal
lead/Fund
Financed;
Chemical Waste
Management
George Buc
(USACE-NY
District)
908-389-3040
Ron Ackerman
(USACE-NY
District)
908-389-3040
1-60
-------
I able 1-1
Remedial Actions: Site-specific Information By Innovative Treatment Technology Through FY 1992
June 1993
Thermal Desorption (continued)
Region
Site Mane, State, (ROD
Date)
Specific
Technology
Site Description
Media (Quantity)
Key Contaminants
Treated
Status#
Lead Agency
and Treatment
Contractor (if
available)
Contacts/Phone
2
American Thermostat, NY
(06/29/90)
Low temperature
thermal
treatment
Thermostat
Manufacturing
Soil (15,000 cy),
Sediments (300
cy)
VOCs (PCE, TCE)
In design;
Design
completion
planned August
1993
Federal
lead/Fund
Financed; TAMS
Consultants/
William
Envi ronmental
Services.(Vendo
r)
Christos
Tsiamis
212-264-5713
2
Claremont Polychemical -
Soil Remedy, NY
£09/28/90)
Low temperature
thermal
treatment
Paint/ink
formation
Soil (3,000 cy)
VOCs (PCE)
In design;
Design
completion
planned fall
1993
State lead/Fund
Financed;
USACE/Rust
Envi ronmental
Dick Kaplin
212-264-3819
2
Fulton Terminals, Soil
Treatment, NY (09/29/89)
Low temperature
thermal
treatment
Former hazardous
waste storage
facility
Soil (4,000 cy)
VOCs (TCE, DCE,
Benzene, Xylene)
In design;
Design
completion
planned Summer
1993
PRP
lead/Federal
oversight
Christos
Tsiamis
212-264-5713
2
Sarney Farm, NY
<09/27/90)
Thermal
desorption
(followed by
onsite
incineration of
organics)
Industrial
landfill,
Municipal
landfill
Soil (quantity
unknown)
VOCs (Chloroform,
TCE, PCE,
Toluene), SVOCs
(Phthalates)
In design;
Design
completion
planned Winter
1993
Federal
lead/Fund
Financed
Kevin Willis
212-264-8777
2
Solvent Savers, NY
(09/30/90)
See also Soil Vapor
Extraction
Low temperature
thermal
treatment
Solvent recovery
facility,
Chemical
reclamation
Soil (60,000 cy)
VOCs (DCE, TCE),
PCBs
Predesign; PD
Completion
planned Uinter
1993
PRP
lead/Federal
oversight
Lisa Wong
212-264-5712
1-61
-------
Table 1-1
Remedial Actions: Site-specific Information By Innovative Treatment Technology Through FY 1992 June 1993
Thermal Desorption (continued!
Region
Site Kane, State, (ROD
Date)
Specific
Technology
Site Description
Media (Quantity)
Key Contaminants
Treated
Status#
Lead Agency
and Treatment
Contractor (if
available)
Contacts/Phone
3
U.S.A. Letterkenny SE
Area, 0U1*, PA
(06/28/91)
Low temperature
thermal
treatment (may
need s/s for
metals after
thermal
desorption)
Munitions
manufacturing/
storage, Drum
storage
Soil (14,000 cy)
VOCs (TCE,
Ethylbenzene,
Xylene)
Design
completed but
not installed;
Completion
planned Surrmer
1993
Federal
facility;
KcLaren Hart
Denis Orenshare
215-597-7858
Georgette Myers
(Letterkenny)
717-267-8483
3
Saunders Supply Co, OU
1, VA (09/30/91)
See also Dechlorination
Low temperature
thermal
treatment
(Vapors will be
captured on
carbon)
Wood preserving
Soil (25,000 cy)
SVOCs (PCP)
Predesign; PD
Completion
planned Fall
1993
Federal
lead/Fund
Financed;
Ecology &
Environment, no
vendor yet
Andy Palestini
215-597-1286
4
Ciba-Geigy (Macintosh
Plant) 00 4, AL
(07/14/92)
See also In situ
Flushing
Thermal
desorption
Liquid injection
Incineration
Chemical
Manufacturing
Soil (110 cy),
Sludge (quantity
unknown)
VOCs (Chloroform,
Toluene, Xylene),
Biocides
(Atrazine,
Diazinon,
Prometryn,
Simazine)
Predesign;
Design will
also use
treatability
studies being
conducted at
ou-2
PRP
lead/Federal
oversight
Charles King
404-347-2643
4
Ciba-Geigy Corp.
(Macintosh Plant) 0U 2,
AL (09/30/91)
See also In situ
Flushing
Lou temperature
thermal
treatment to be
evaluated during
treatability
study
Agriculture
Applications,
Pesticide
manufacturing/use
/storage. Other
organic chemical
manufacturing
Soil (130,000
cy), Sludge
(quantity
unknown)
VOCs, Biocides
In design;
Design
completion
planned Winter
1995;
Treatability
studies
ongoing
PRP
lead/Federal
oversight; COM/
FPC (Demolition
/Design
contractors)
Charles King
404-347-2643
4
Smith's Farm Brooks, OU
1*, KY (09/30/91)
See also Dechlorination
Low temperature
thermal
treatment
Drum storage/
disposal
Soil (16,000 cy)
PCBs, PAHs
(Carcinogenic
PAHs)
Design
completed but
not installed;
Completion
planned Spring
1995
PRP
lead/Federal
oversight
Tony DeAngelo
404-347-7791
1-62
-------
June 199
Region
Site Name, State, (ROD
Date)
Specific
Technology
Site Description
Media (Quantity)
Key Contaminants
T reated
Status#
Lead Agency
and Treatment
Contractor (if
available)
Contacts/Phone
4
Aberdeen Pesticide
Dumps, OU 4, NC
(09/30/91)
Thermal
desorption
(treatment for
organic vapors
not yet
determi nd
Pesticide
manufactur i ng/use
/storage
Soil (124,000 cy)
Biocides (DDT,
Toxaphene,
Benzene
Hexachloride)
Predesign; PD
Completion
planned
September 1993
PRP
lead/Federal
oversight
Kay Crane
404-347-7791
Randy McElveen
919-733-2801
4
Potter's Septic Tank
Service Pits, NC
(08/05/92)
Low temperature
thermal
treatment
Waste petroleum
and septic tank
sludge disposal
pit
Soil (10,100 cy).
Sludge (quantity
unknown)
VOCs (BTEX), PAHs
(Carcinogenic
PAHs,
Naphthalene)
In design;
Design
completion
planned Sunnier
1994
Federal
lead/Fund
Financed
Beverly Hudson
404-347-7791
4
Sangamo/Twelve-
Mile/Hartwell PCB, OU 1,
SC (12/19/90)
Low temperature
thermal
desorption
(vapors captured
on carbon)
Capacitor
manufacturer
Soil (80,000 cy)
sludge (20,000
cy)
PCBs, VOCs
Design; Design
Completion
planned Fall
1993;
PRP
lead/Federal
oversi ght
Bernie Hayes
404-347-7791
Richard Haynes
(SC)
803-734-5487
4
Wamchem*, SC (06/30/88)
Thermal
desorption
(vapors captured
on carbon)
Former Dye
Manufacturing
Plant
Soil (2,000 cy)
VOCs (BTX)
Being
installed
Four seasons
PRP
lead/Federal
oversight
Terry Tanner
404-347-7791
4
Arlington Blending &
Packaging Co., OU 1*, TN
(06/28/91)
See also Dechlorination
Thermal
desorption;
residual soil
and vapor to be
dechlorinated
Pesticide
manufactur i ng/use
/storage. Other
organic chemical
manufacturing
Soil (5,000 cy)
VOCs (DCE), SVOCs
(PCP), Biocides
(Chlordane,
Heptachlor)
In design;
Design
completion
planned Uinter
1993
PRP
lead/Federal
oversight
Derek Matory
404-347-7791
5
Acme Solvent Reclaiming,
Inc. OU 2, IL (12/31/90)
See also Soil Vapor
Extraction
Low temperature
thermal
treatment
(followed by s/s
for lead)
Industrial
landfill.
Municipal water
supply
Soil (6,000 cy)
VOCs (TCA, DCE,
DCA, TCE, PCE,
Vinyl chloride,
4-methyl 2
pentanone,,
Benzene), SVOCs
(Naphthalene),
PCBs
In design;
Design
completion
planned Summer
1994
PRP
lead/Federal
oversight;
Harding Lawson
- Prime
Deborah Orr
312-886-7576
1-63
-------
Table 1-1
Remedial Actions: Site-specific Information By Innovative Treatment Technology Through FY 1992 June 1993
Thermal Desorption (continued)
Region
Site Name, State, (R00
Date)
Specific
Technology
Site Description
Media (Quantity)
Key Contaminants
Treated
Status#
Lead Agency
and Treatment
Contractor (if
avallable)
Contacts/Phone
5
Outboard Marine/Waukegan
Harbor, OU 3*, IL
(03/31/89)
Low temperature
thermal
treatment
Marine Products
Manufacturing
Soil (16,000 cy).
Sediments
(quantity
unknown)
PCBs
Completed;
Summer 1992
PRP
lead/Federal
oversight;
Soiltech
Cindy Nolan
312-886-0400
5
American Chemical
Services*, IN (09/30/92)
See also Soil Vapor
Extraction
Low temperature
thermal
treatment
Other organic
chemical
manufacturing.
Solvent recovery
facility
Soil (quantity
unknown), Sludge
(quantity
unknown). Solids
(65,000 cy)
VOCs, PCBs
Predesign;
Schedule
pending
completion of
negotiation
with PRPs
In negotiation
Wayde Hartwick
312-886-7067
5
Anderson Development
(ROD Amendment)*, MI
(09/30/91)
Low temperature
thermal
treatment
off-site
disposal of
residuals
Other organic
chemical
manufacturing
Soil (8,000 cy),
Sludge (quantity
unknown)
Organics (MBOCAs,
4, 4'- Methylene,
Bis-2-chloroanili
ne)
Operational;
Completion
planned Summer
1993;
Treatment
began Jan. 5,
1992. In
pilot test,
MBOCAs reduced
from 2,800 ppm
in sludges to
1.6 ppm
PRP
lead/Federal
oversight;
Weston
Services, Inc
Jim Hahnenberg
312-353-4213
5
Carter Industries*, MI
(09/18/91)
Low temperature
thermal
treatment
(followed by s/s
of soils and
incin. of PCB
oil)
Scrap metal
salvager
Soil (46,000 cy),
Solids (quantity
unknown)
PCBs
In design;
Design
completion
planned Fall
1994
PRP
lead/Federal
oversight;
Connestoga-
Rovers
Associates
Jon Peterson
312-353-1264
8
Martin Marietta (Denver
Aerospace), CO
(09/24/90)
See also Soil Vapor
Extraction
Low temperature
thermal
treatment
(followed by s/s
of soils and
incin. of
vapors)
Aerospace
Equi pment
Manufacturer -
Bulk storage
facility and
industrial
landfill
Soil (2,300 cy)
VOCs (TCE), PCBs
In design
PRP lead/State
oversight;
under RCRA;
Geraghty &
Miller
George Dancik
303-293-1506
Susan Chaki
(CO)
303-331-4832
-------
June 1993
Region
Site Name, State, (R00
Date)
Specific
Technology
Site Description
Media (Quantity)
Key Contaminants
Treated
Status#
Lead Agency
and Treatment
Contractor (if
available)
Contacts/Phone
8
Sand Creek Industrial,
OU 5*. CO (09/28/90)
low temperature
thermal
treatment
Pesticide
manufacturing/use
/storage
Soil (8,000 cy)
Organics
(Biocides)
Predesign;
Prepared ROD
amendnent to
change remedy
from soil
washing
Federal
lead/Fund
Financed
Erna Aeheson
303-294-1971
1-65
-------
Table 1-1
Remedial Actions: Site-specific Information By Innovative Treatment Technology Through FY 1992
June 1993
Other
Region
Site Harae, State,
(ROD Date)
Specific
Technology
Site Description
Hedia (Quantity)
Key Contaminants
Treated
Status#
Lead Agency
and Treatment
Contractor (if
available)
Contacts/Phone
1
South Municipal Water
Supply Well*, NH
(09/27/89)
See also Soil Vapor
Extraction
Air sparging
Ball Bearing
Manufacturing
Groundwater
VOCs
(PCE.TCA.TCE)
Being
installed;
Construction
to start
summer 1993
PRP
lead/Federal
oversi ght
Roger Duwart
617-573-9628
Tom Andrews
(NH)
603-271-2910
2
Applied Environmental
Services, 0U 1, NY
(06/24/91)
See also
Bioremediation (In
Situ), Soil Vapor
Extraction
Air sparging
Bulk petroleum and
hazardous waste
storage facility
Groundwater
VOCs (BTEX),
SVOCs
In design;
Design
completion
planned Winter
1993
PRP lead/State
oversight
Andrew English
(NY)
518-457-0315
Jeff Tradd
518-457-1708
3
Brodhead Creek, OU 1,
PA (03/29/91)
CROW technology
using hot water
injection to
mobilize coal
tar
Coal gasification
site
Soil (200 cy),
Groundwater
PAHs, DNAPLs
Predesign; PD
Completion
planned Summer
1993
PRP
lead/Federal
oversight;
Remediation
Technologies,
Western
Research
Institute
John Banks
215-597-8555
3
Brown's Battery
Breaking Site, OU 2,
PA (07/02/92)
See also Other
Technologies
Limestone
barrier
Battery recycling/
disposal
Groundwater
Metals (Lead)
Predesign; PD
Completion
planned Winter
1993
PRP
lead/Federal
oversight
Richard Watman
215-697-8996
3
Brown's Battery
Breaking Site, OU 2,
PA (07/02/92)
See also Chemical
T reatment
Fuming
Gasification
Battery recycling
/disposal
Soil (quantity
unknown), Solids
(quantity
unknown)
Metals (Lead),
PCBs, PAHs,
Chlorinated
Pesticides,
Phthalate esters
Predesign; PD
Completion
planned Winter
1993
PRP
lead/Federal
oversight
Richard Watman
215-597-8996
3
Tonolli Corporation,
PA (09/30/92)
Limestone
barrier
Battery recycling
/disposal
Groundwater
Metals (Lead)
Predesign; PD
Completion
planned Sumner
1993
PRP
lead/Federal
oversight
Linda Dietz
215-597-6906
-------
Remedial Actions: Site-specific Information By Innovative Treatment Technology Through FY 1992
Other (continued)
June 199
Region
Site Name, State,
(ROD Date)
Specific
Technology
Site Description
Media (Quantity)
Key Contaminants
Treated
Status#
Lead Agency
and Treatment
Contractor (if
available)
Contacts/Phone
6
Prewitt Abandoned
Refinery, NH
(09/30/92)
See also
Bioremediation (Ex
Situ), Soil Vapor
Extraction
Air Sparging
Crude oil refinery
Groundwater
Organics (NAPLs)
Predesign
PRP
lead/Federal
oversight
Monica
Chapa-Smi th
214-655-6780
6
Petro-Chefflical
Systems, Inc., OU 2,
TX (09/06/91)
See also Soil Vapor
Extraction
Air sparging
Petroleum refining
and reuse
Groundwater
VQCs (BTEX),
SVOCs
(Naphthalene)
Predesigrt
Federal
lead/Fund
Financed; not
chosen
Chris Villareal
214-655-6758
1-67
-------
THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
1-68
-------
TABLE 1-2
REMEDIAL ACTIONS; INNOVATIVE TREATMENT TECHNOLOGIES BY EPA REGION
Table 1-2 summarizes the innovative treatment technologies used at remedial action sites in each EPA region and within each region
by state.
1-69
-------
TABLE 1-2. REMEDIAL ACTIONS: INNOVATIVE TREATMENT TECHNOLOGIES
BY EPA REGION
June 1993
TECBNQLQGY SITE NAME STATE TECHNOLOGY SITE NAME STATE
REGION I
REGION 2 (continued)
Soil Vapor Extraction
Kellogg-Deering Well Field
CT
Solvent Extraction
Ewan Property
NJ
Bioremediation (Ex situ)
Iron Horse Park
MA
Thermal Desorption
Industrial Latex, OU 1
NJ
Bioremediation (In situ)
Hocomonco Pond, ESD
MA
Thermal Desorption
Lipari Landfill Marsh Sediment
NJ
Solvent Extraction
Norwood PCBs
MA
Thermal Desorption
Metaltec/Aerosystems, OU 1
NJ
Thermal Desorption
Cannon Engineering/Bridgewater
MA
Thermal Desorption
Reich Farms
NJ
Thermal Desorption
Re-Solve
MA
Thermal Desorption
Waldick Aerospace Devices
NJ
Soil Vapor Extraction
Groveland Wells
MA
Soil Vapor Extraction
A O Polymer, Soil treatment phase
NJ
Soil Vapor Extraction
Silresim
MA
Soil Vapor Extraction
FAA Technical Center
NJ
Soil Vapor Extraction
Wells G&H OU 1
MA
Soil Vapor Extraction
Garden State Cleaners
NJ
Solvent Extraction
O'Connor
ME
Soil Vapor Extraction
South Jersey Clothing
NJ
Thermal Desorption
McKin
ME
Soil Vapor Extraction
Swope Oil & Chem Co., OU 2
NJ
Thermal Desorption
Union Chemical Co., OU 1
ME
Bioremediation (Ex situ)
General Motors/Central Foundry OU 1
NY
In situ Flushing
Tibbetts Road
NH
Bioremediation (Ex situ)
General Motors/Central Foundry OU 2
NY
Thermal Desorption
Ottati & Goss
NH
Bioremediation (In situ)
Applied Environmental Services (GW)
NY
Soil Vapor Extraction
Mottolo Pig Farm
NH
Bioremediation (In situ)
Applied Environmental Services OU 1
NY
Soil Vapor Extraction
South Municipal Water Supply Wells
NH
Dechlorination
Wide Beach Development
NY
Soil Vapor Extraction
Tibbetts Road
NH
In situ Flushing
Byron Barrel & Drum
NY
Soil Vapor Extraction
Tinkham Garage
NH
In situ Flushing
Pasley Solvents and Chemicals
NY
Air Sparging
South Municipal Water Supply Wells
NH
Thermal Desorption
American Thermostat
NY
Soil Vapor Extraction
Stamina Mills
RI
Thermal Desorption
Claremont Polychemical - Soil
NY
Thermal Desorption
Fulton Terminals, Soil Treatment
NY
Thermal Desorption
Sarney Farm
NY
Thermal Desorption
Solvent Savers
NY
REGION 2
Soil Vapor Extraction
Applied Environmental Services OU 1
NY
Soil Vapor Extraction
Circuitron Corporation, OU 1
NY
Bioremediation (In situ)
FAA Technical Center
NJ
Soil Vapor Extraction
Genzale Plating Company, OU 1
NY
Bioremediation (In situ)
Swope OU & Chem Co., OU 2
NJ
Soil Vapor Extraction
Mattiace Petrochemicals Company
NY
Dechlorination
Myers Properly
NJ
Soil Vapor Extraction
Pasley Solvents and Chemicals
NY
la situ Flushing
Lipari Landfill
NJ
Soil Vapor Extraction
SMS Instruments (Deer Park)
NY
In situ Flushing
Naval Air Engineering Center OU 7
NJ
Soil Vapor Extraction
Solvent Savers
NY
In situ Flushing
Vineland Chemical, OU 1 and OU 2
NJ
Soil Vapor Extraction
* Vestal Water Supply 1-1
NY
Soil Washing
Ewan Property
NJ
Air Sparging
Applied Environmental Services OU 1
NY
Soil Washing
King of Prussia
NJ
Soil Washing
GE Wiring Devices
PR
Soil Washing
Myers Property
NJ
Soil Vapor Extraction
Upjohn Manufacturing Co.
PR
Soil Washing
Vineland Chemical, OU 1 and OU 2
NJ
1-70
-------
TABLE 1-2. REMEDIAL ACTIONS: INNOVATIVE TREATMENT TECHNOLOGIES
BY EPA REGION (continued)
TECHNOLOGY
SITE NAME
STATE
REGION 3
Bioremediation (Ex situ)
Whitmoyer Laboratories, OU 3
PA
Thermal Desorption
U.S.A. Letterkenny SE Area, OU
PA
Soil Vapor Extraction
Bendix
PA
Soil Vapor Extraction
Cryochem, OU 3
PA
Soil Vapor Extraction
Henderson Road
PA
Soil Vapor Extraction
Lord-Shope Landfill
PA
Soil Vapor Extraction
Raymark
PA
Soil Vapor Extraction
Tyson's Dump
PA
Limestone Barrier
Brown's Battery Breaking Site
PA
Crow Technology
Brodhead Creek, OU 1
PA
Fuming Gasification
Brown's Battery Breaking Site
PA
Limestone Barrier
Tonolli Corporation
PA
Bioremediation (Ex situ)
L. A. Clarke & Sons, Lagoon Sludge OU
VA
Bioremediation (In situ)
L. A. Clarke & Sons, OU 1
VA
Dechlorination
Saunders Supply Co, OU 1
VA
In situ Flushing
L. A. Clarke & Sons, OU 1
VA
In situ Flushing
U.S. Titanium
VA
Thermal Desorption
Saunders Supply Co, OU 1
VA
Soil Vapor Extraction
Arrowhead Associates/Scovill
VA
Soil Vapor Extraction
Defense General Supply Center
VA
Bioremediation (Ex situ)
Ordnance Works Disposal Areas
wv
111 situ Flushing
In situ Flushing
Thermal Desoiption
Thermal Desorption
Bioremediation (Ex situ)
Bioremediation (Ex situ)
Bioremediation (Ex situ)
Bioremediation (Ex situ)
Bioremediation (In situ)
Bioremediation (In situ)
REGION 4
Ciba-Geigy (Macintosh Plant) OU 2 AL
Ciba-Geigy (Macintosh Plant) OU 4 AL
Ciba-Geigy (Macintosh Plant) OU 2 AL
Ciba-Geigy (Macintosh Plant) OU 4 AL
Brown Wood Preserving FL
Cabot Carbon/Koppers FL
Dubose Oil Products FL
Whitehouse Waste Oil Pits FL
Cabot Carbon/Koppers FL
Cabot Carbon/Koppers (Groundwater) FL
TECHNOLOGY
SITE NAME
REGION 4 {continued)
June 1993
STATE
Soil Washing
Soil Washing
Soil Vapor Extraction
Soil Vapor Extraction
Dechlorination
Thermal Desorption
Bioremediation (Ex situ)
Bioremediation (Ex situ)
Bioremediation (Ex situ)
Bioremediation (In situ)
Chemical Treatment
In situ Flushing
Soil Washing
Soil Washing
Solvent Extraction
Thermal Desorption
Thermal Desorption
Soil Vapor Extraction
Soil Vapor Extraction
Chemical Treatment
Thermal Desorption
Thermal Desorption
Soil Vapor Extraction
Soil Vapor Extraction
Dechlorination
Thermal Desorption
Soil Vapor Extraction
Cabot Carbon/Koppers
Whitehouse Waste Oil Pits
Hollingsworth Solderless
Robins AFB, Landfill and Sludge Lagoon
Smith's Farm Brooks, OU 1
Smith's Farm Brooks, OU 1
Benfield Industries
Cape Fear Wood Preserving
Charles Macon Lagoon, Lagoon # 10
Benfield Industries
JFD Electronics/Channel Master
JADCO-Hughes
Benfield Industries
Cape Fear Wood Preserving
Carolina T ransformer
Aberdeen Pesticide Dumps, OU 4
Potter's Septic Tank Service Pits
Charles Macon Lagoon, Lagoon § 7
JADCO-Hughes
Palmetto Wood Preserving
Sangamo/Twelve-Mile/Hartwell PCB
Wamchem
Medley Farm, OU 1
SCRDI Bluff Road
Arlington Blending & Packaging
Arlington Blending & Packaging
Carrier Air Conditioning
Bioremediation (Ex situ)
Thermal Desorption
Thermal Desorption
Soil Vapor Extraction
FL
FL
FL
GA
KY
KY
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
sc
sc
sc
sc
sc
TN
TN
TN
regions
Galesburg/Koppers EL
Acme Solvent Reclaiming, Inc. DL
Outboard Marine/Waukegan Harbor EL
Acme Solvent Reclaiming, Inc. IL
1-71
-------
TABLE 1-2. REMEDIAL ACTIONS: INNOVATIVE TREATMENT TECHNOLOGIES
BY EPA REGION (continued)
June 1993
TECHNOLOGY
SITE NAME
STATE
TECHNOLOGY
STONAME
REGION 5 (continued)
REGIONS (continued)
Bioremediation (In situ)
Seymour Recycling
IN
Soil Vapor Extraction
Zanesville Well Field
OH
Bioremediation (In situ)
Seymour Recycling (Ground water)
IN
•Bioremediation (Ex situ)
Moss-American
WI
In situ Flushing
Ninth Avenue Dump
IN
Bioremediation (In situ)
Hagen Farm Site, Ground Water OU
WI
Thermal Desorption
American Chemical Services
IN
Bioremediation (In situ)
Onalaska Municipal Landfill
WI
Soil Vapor Extraction
American Chemical Services
IN
Soil Washing
Moss-American
WI
Soil Vapor Extraction
Enviro. Conservation and Chemical
"IN
Soil Vapor Extraction
City Disposal Corporation Landfill
WI
Soil Vapor Extraction
Fisher Calo Chem
IN
Soil Vapor Extraction
Hagen Farm
WI
Soil Vapor Extraction
MIDCOI
IN
Soil Vapor Extraction
Muskego Sanitary Landfill
WI
Soil Vapor Extraction
Main Street Well Field
IN
Soil Vapor Extraction
Wausau Groundwater Contamination
WI
Soil Vapor Extraction
MODCOII
IN
Soil Vapor Extraction
Seymour Recycling
IN
Soil Vapor Extraction
Wayne Waste Reclamation
IN
Bioremediation (Ex situ)
Cliffs/Dow Dump
MI
REGION 6
In situ Flushing
Rasmussen Dump
MI
In situ Vitrification
Ionia City Landfill
MI
Soil Washing
Arkwood
AR
Thermal Desorption
Anderson Development
MI
Bioremediation (Ex situ)
Old Inger Oil Refinery
LA
Thermal Desorption
Carter Industries
MI
Bioremediation (Ex situ)
Prewitt Abandoned Refinery
NM
Soil Vapor Extraction
Chem Central
MI
Bioremediation (In situ)
Atchison/Santa Fe/Clovis
NM
Soil Vapor Extraction
Clare Water Supply
MI
Soil Vapor Extraction
Prewitt Abandoned Refinery
NM
Soil Vapor Extraction
Electro-Voice, OU 1
MI
Soil Vapor Extraction
South Valley
NM
Soil Vapor Extraction
Kysor Industrial
MI
Air Sparging
Prewitt Abandoned Refinery
NM
Soil Vapor Extraction
Peerless Plating
MI
Bioremediation (Ex situ)
Oklahoma Refining Co.
OK
Soil Vapor Extraction
Springfield Township Dump
MI
Bioremediation (In situ)
Oklahoma Refining Co.
OK
Soil Vapor Extraction
Sturgis Municipal Well Field
MI
Soil Vapor Extraction
Tinker AFB (Soldier Creek BIdg. 3001)
OK
Soil Vapor Extraction
ThermoChem, Inc. OU 1
MI
Bioremediation (Ex situ)
North Cavalcade Street
TX
Soil Vapor Extraction
Verona Well Field (Thomas Solvent)
MI
Bioremediation (Ex situ)
Sheridan Disposal Services
TX
Soil Vapor Extraction
Verona Well Field, OU 2
MI
Bioremediation (In situ)
French Limited
TjX»
Bioremediation (Ex situ)
Burlington Northern Railroad Tie
MN
In situ Flushing
Koppers/Texarkana
TX
Bioremediation (Ex situ)
Joslyn Manufacturing and Supply
MN
la situ Flushing
South Cavalcade Street
TX
Bioremediation (Ex situ)
South Andover Salvage Yard OU 2
MN
Soil Washing
Koppers/Texarkana
TX
Soil Vapor Extraction
Long Prairie GW Contamination
MN
Soil-Washing
South Cavalcade Street
TX
Bioremediation (In situ)
Allied Chem & Ironton Coke, OU 2
OH
Solvent Extraction
United Creosoting
TX
Soil Washing
United Scrap Lead/SIA
OH
Soil Vapor Extraction
Petro-Chemical Systems, Inc. OU 2
TX
Soil Washing
Zanesville Well Field
OH
Air Sparging
Petro-Chemical Systems, Inc. OU 2
TX
Soil Vapor Extraction
Miami County Incinerator
OH
Soil Vapor Extraction
Pristine (ROD Amendment)
OH
1-72
-------
TABLE 1-2. REMEDIAL ACTIONS; INNOVATIVE TREATMENT TECHNOLOGIES
BY EPA REGION (continued)
June 1993
TECHNOLOGY
SITE NAME
STATE
TECHNOLOGY
SITE NAME
STATE
REGION 7
REGION 9
Bioremediation (Ex situ)
Vogel Paint & Wax
IA
Soil Vapor Extraction
Hassayampa Landfill
AZ
Bioremediation (In situ)
People's Natural Gas
IA
Soil Vapor Extraction
Indian Bend Wash, South Area
AZ
Bioremediation (In situ)
Pester Burn Pond
KS
Soil Vapor Extraction
Mesa Area Ground Water Contamination AZ
In situ Flushing
Pester Burn Pond
KS
Soil Vapor Extraction
Motorola 52nd Street
AZ
Soil Vapor Extraction
Coleman Operable Unit 29th and
KS
Soil Vapor Extraction
Phoenix-Goodyear Airport Area
AZ
In situ Flushing
Lee Chemical
MO
Bioremediation (Ex situ)
J.H. Baxter
CA
Soil Vapor Extraction
Hastings GW Contamination (Col. Ave.)
NE
Bioremediation (Ex situ)
Jasco Chemical Co.
CA
Soil Vapor Extraction
Hastings GW Contamination (Far Marco)
NE
Bioremediation (In situ)
Castle Air Force Base, OU 1
CA
Soil Vapor Extraction
Hastings GW Contamination, Well #3
NE
Bioremediation (In situ)
Koppers Company, Inc. (Oroville)
CA
Soil Vapor Extraction
Lindsay Manufacturing
NE
Soil Washing
FMC (Fresno)
CA
Soil Vapor Extraction
Waverly Groundwater Contamination
NE
Soil Washing
Koppers Company, Inc. (Oroville)
CA
Soil Washing
Sacramento Army Depot, Oxidation
Lagoon
CA
Soil Vapor Extraction
Fairchild Semiconductor (San Jose)
CA
REGION 8
Soil Vapor Extraction
Fairchild Semiconductor/MTV-I
CA
Soil Vapor Extraction
Fairchild Semiconductor/MTV-H
CA
Bioremediation (Ex situ)
Broderick Wood Products OU 2
CO
Soil Vapor Extraction
IBM (San Jose)
CA
Bioremediation (In situ)
Broderick Wood Products OU 2
CO
Soil Vapor Extraction
Intel, Mountain View
CA
In situ Vitrification
Rocky Mountain Arsenal, M-l Basins
CO
Soil Vapor Extraction
Intersil/Siemens
CA
Thermal Desorption
Martin Marietta (Denver Aerospace)
CO
Soil Vapor Extraction
Lawrence Livermore National Lab
CA
Thermal Desorption
Sand Creek Industrial, OU 5
CO
Soil Vapor Extraction
Monolithic Memories/AMD - Arques
CA
Soil Vapor Extraction
Chemical Sales Company, OU 1
CO
Soil Vapor Extraction
National Semiconductor (MM)
CA
Soil Vapor Extraction
Martin Marietta (Denver Aerospace)
CO
Soil Vapor Extraction
Pacific Coast Pipeline
CA
Soil Vapor Extraction
Rocky Flats OU 2, Interim Action
CO
Soil Vapor Extraction
Purity Oil Sales OU 2
CA
Soil Vapor Extraction
Rocky Mountain Arsenal OU 18
CO
Soil Vapor Extraction
Raytheon, Mountain View
CA
Soil Vapor Extraction
Sand Creek Industrial OU 1
CO
Soil Vapor Extraction
Sacramento Army Depot, Tank 2
CA
Bioremediation (Ex situ)
Burlington Northern (Somers Plant)
MT
Soil Vapor Extraction
Signetics (AMD 901), TRW OU
CA
Bioremediation (Ex situ)
Idaho Pole Company
MT
Soil Vapor Extraction
Signetics (Advanced Micro Devices)
CA
Bioremediation (Ex situ)
Libby Ground Water Contamination
WT
Soil Vapor Extraction
Solvent Service
CA
Bioremediation (In situ)
Burlington Northern (Somers Plant)
MT
Soil Vapor Extraction
Spectra Physics, OU 1
CA
Bioremediation (In situ)
Idaho Pole Company
MT
Soil Vapor Extraction
Teledyne Semiconductors
CA
Bioremediation (In situ)
Libby Ground Water Contamination
MT
Soil Vapor Extraction
Van Waters and Rogers
CA
In situ Flushing
Idaho Pole Company
MT
Soil Vapor Extraction
Watkins-Johnson
CA
Bioremediation (Ex situ)
Wasatch Chemical
UT
Chemical Treatment
Portland Cement Co. (Kiln Dust)
UT
In situ Vitrification
Wasatch Chemical
UT
1-73
-------
TABLE 1-2. REMEDIAL ACTIONS: INNOVATIVE TREATMENT TECHNOLOGIES
BY EPA REGION (continued)
June 1993
TECHNOLOGY
fflTE
STATE
TECHNOLOGY
grrg^AME
STATE
Bioremediation (Ex situ)
Bioremediation (In situ)
Soil Vapor Extraction
In situ Hushing
Bioremediation (Ex situ)
In situ Flushing
Soil Washing
Soil Washing
Soil Vapor Extraction
REGION 10
McChord AFB Washrack Treatment Area AK
Eielson Air Force Base AK
Eielson Air Force Base AK
Union Pacific Railroad Sludge ID
Umatilla Army Depot Activity OR
United Chrome Products OR
Gould Battery OR
Naval Submarine Base, Bangor Site A WA
Commencement Bay/S. Tacoma Channel WA
1-74
-------
TABLE 1-3
REMEDIAL ACTIONS: PROJECT STATUS BY INNOVATIVE TREATMENT TECHNOLOGY
Table 1-3 lists the applications of innovative treatment technologies at NPL sites by technology and summarizes the status of the
specific application. The symbols used in this table are:
PD -
In predesign: A site may be considered to be in predesign if EPA is negotiating the consent decree for the design with
the responsible party, the lead agency is preparing the predesign report, the lead agency is contracting for the design firm,
or the lead agency is conducting a treatability study or field investigation before beginning actual design work.
D -
In design: A site is considered to be in design after the design contractor has begun work.
D/I -
Design completed but not installed: This symbol is used if the design work had been completed but installation work
has not yet begun at the time of publication of this report.
I -
Being installed: An innovative treatment technology is "being installed" from the time the construction contract has been
awarded until the time the treatment system has begun operation. For some technologies, this is a relatively short phase
of the project, because such projects are assembled quickly on site. For other technologies, the period of installation lasts
several construction seasons.
0 -
Operational. A treatment technology is operational once it has been constructed and is functional. The length of time
required to complete the operation phase depends on such factors as the nature of the technology, the quantity of material
to be treated, and the concentrations of the contaminants at the start of treatment.
C -
Completed: A treatment technology project is considered to be completed when the operation of the treatment
technology ceases. Other site activities still may be planned or underway.
1-75
-------
TABLE 1-3. REMEDIAL ACTIONS: PROJECT STATUS
BY INNOVATIVE TREATMENT TECHNOLOGY
June 1993
REGION BIOREMEDIATION fEX SITU)
Status
REGION BIOREMEDIATTON (IN SITU)
STATES
2
General Motors/Central Foundry Division, OU 1, NY
PD
2
Swope Oi! & Chem Co., OU 2, NJ
PD
2
Genera! Motors/Central Foundry Division, OU 2, NY
PD
3
L. A. Clarke & Sons, OU 1 (Soils), VA
PD
3
Ordnance Works Disposal Areas, WV
PD
4
Benfield Industries, NC'
PD
4
Benfield Industries, NC
PD
6
Oklahoma Refining Co., OK
PD
5
Galesburg/Koppers, IL
PD
7
Pester Burn Pond, KS
PD
5
Moss-American, WI
PD
7
People's Natural Gas, IA
PD
5
South Andover Salvage Yard OU 2, MN
PD
8
Idaho Pole Company, MT
PD
6
Prewitt Abandoned Refinery, NM
PD
2
Applied Environmental Services, OU 1, NY
D
6
Oklahoma Refining Co., OK
PD
2
Applied Environmental Services (Ground water), NY
D
6
Sheridan Disposal Services, TX
PD
4
Cabot Carbon/Koppers (Ground water), FL
D
8
Idaho Pole Company, MT
PD
4
Cabot Carbon/Koppers, FL
D
9
Jasco Chemical Co., CA
PD
5
Hagen Farm Site, Ground Water Control OU, WI
D
3
L.A. Clarke & Sons, Lagoon Sludge OU, VA
D
5
Allied Chem & Ironton Coke, OU 2, OH
D
3
Whitmoyer Laboratories, OU 3, PA
D
9
Castle Air Force Base, OU 1, CA
D '
4
Cabot Carbon/Koppers, FL
D
9
Koppers Company, Inc. (OroviUe Plant), CA
D
4
Charles Macon Lagoon, Lagoon #10, NC
D
10
Eielson Air Force Base, AK
D
4
Whitehouse Waste OU Pits (amended ROD), FL
D
2
FAA Technical Center, NJ
D/I
5
Cliffs/Dow Dump, MD
D
5
Onalaska Municipal Landfill, WI
D/I
6
North Cavalcade Street, TX
D
1
Hocomonco Pond, ESD, MA
I
9
l.H. Baxter, CA
D
8
Broderick Wood Products OU 2, CO
I
10
Umatilla Army Depot Activity, Soil Operable Unit, OR
D
8
Burlington Northern (Somers Plant), MT
I
10
McChord AFB Washrack Treatment Area, AK
D
5
Seymour Recycling (Ground water), IN
0
4
Cape Fear Wood Preserving, NC
D/I
6
Atchison/Santa Fe/Clovis, NM
0
4
Dubose Oil Products, FL
I
6
French Limited, TX
0
8
Broderick Wood Products OU 2, CO
I
8
Libby Ground Water Contamination, MT
0
1
Iron Horse Park, MA
0
5
Seymour Recycling, IN
C
5
Burlington Northern Railroad Tie Treating Plant, MN
0
5
Joslyn Manufacturing and Supply Co., MN
0
6
Old Inger Oil Refinery, LA
0
REGION CHEMICAL TREATMENT
STATUS
7
Vogel Paint & Wax, IA
0
8
Burlington Northern (Somers Plant), MT
0
4
JFD Electronics/Channel Master, NC
PD
8
Wasatch Chemical, UT
o
8
Portland Cement Co. (Kiln Dust No.2 and No.3) OU 2, UT
D
8
Libby Ground Water Contamination, MT
0
4
Palmetto Wood Preserving, SC
C
4
Brown Wood Preserving, FL
c
1-76
-------
TABLE 1-3. REMEDIAL ACTIONS; PROJECT STATUS
BY INNOVATIVE TREATMENT TECHNOLOGY (continued)
June 1993
REGION DECHLORINATION
STATUS
REGION SOIL VAPOR EXTRACTION
STATUS
3
Saunders Supply Co, OU 1, VA
PD
1
Tibbetts Road, NH
PD
2
Myers Property, NJ
D
1
Stamina Mills, RI
PD
4
Arlington Blending & Packaging Co., OU 1, TN
D
2
Solvent Savers, NY
PD
4
Smith's Farm Brooks, OU 1, KY
D/I
2
Vestal Water Supply 1-1, NY
PD
2
Wide Beach Development, NY
C
2
Mattiace Petrochemicals Company, OU 1, NY
PD
2
Swope Oil & Chem Co., OU 2, NJ
PD
3
Cryochem, OU 3, PA
PD
3
Bendix, PA
PD
3
Arrowhead Associates/Scovill, OU 1, VA
PD
REGION IN STTIJ FLUSHING
STATUS
4
Robins AFB, Landfill and Sludge Lagoon, OU 1, GA
PD
4
Medley Farm, OU 1, SC
PD
1
Tibbette Road, NH
PD
4
SCRDI Bluff Road, SC
PD
2
Byron Barrel & Drum, NY
PD
5
MIDCO n, IN
PD
4
Ciba-Geigy Corp. (Macintosh Plant) OU 2, AL
PD
5
Zanesville Well Field, OH
PD
4
Ciba-Geigy (Macintosh Plant) OU 4, AL
PD
5
ThermoChem, Inc. OU 1, MI
PD
6
Koppers/Texarkana, TX
PD
5
City Disposal Corporation Landfill, WI
PD
7
Pester Bum Pond, KS
PD
5
MIDCO I, IN
PD
8
Idaho Pole Company, MT
PD
5
Clare Water Supply, MI
PD
10
Union Pacific Railroad Sludge Pit, ID
PD
5
Peerless Plating, MI
PD
2
Vineland Chemical, OU 1 and OU 2, NJ
D
5
Electro-Voice, OU 1, MI
PD
2
Pasley Solvents and Chemicals, Inc., NY
D
5
Springfield Township Dump, MI
PD
2
Naval Air Engineering Center OU 7, interim action, NJ
D
5
Sturgis Municipal Well Field, MI
PD
3
L. A. Clarke & Sons, OU 1 (Soils), VA
D
5
American Chemical Services, IN
PD
3
U.S. Titanium, VA
D
6
Prewitt Abandoned Refinery, NM
PD
5
Rasmussen Dump, MI
D
6
Petro-Chemical Systems, Inc., OU 2, TX
PD
5
Ninth Avenue Dump, IN
D
7
Coleman Operable Unit 29th and Mead, KS
PD
6
South Cavalcade Street, TX
D
8
Rocky Flats OU 2, Interim Remedial Action Plan, CO
PD
4
JADCO-Hughes, NC
I
9
Motorola 52nd Street, AZ
PD
7
Lee Chemical, MO
I
9
Indian Bend Wash, South Area, OU 1, AZ
PD
2
Lipari Landfill, NJ
0
9
Purity Oil Sales OU 2, CA
PD
10
United Chrome Products, OR
0
9
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, CA
PD
1
Silresim, MA
D
REGION
IN SITU VITRIFICATION
STATUS
1
Kellogg-Deering Well Field, CT
D
1
Tinkham Garage, NH
D
5
Ionia City Landfill, MI
D
2
Applied Environmental Services, OU 1, NY
D
8
Rocky Mountain Arsenal, M-l Basins (OU 16), CO
D
2
Garden State Cleaners, NJ
D
8
Wasatch Chemical, UT
D
2
Circuitron Corporation, OU 1, NY
D
2
Pasley Solvents and Chemicals, Inc., NY
D
1-77
-------
TABLE 1-3. REMEDIAL ACTIONS: PROJECT STATUS
BY INNOVATIVE TREATMENT TECHNOLOGY (continued)
June 1993
REGION SOIL VAPOR EXTRACTION (continued)
STATUS
REGION
SOIL VAPOR EXTRACTION (continued)
STATUS
2
A 0 Polymer, Soil treatment phase, NJ
D
2
Genzale Plating Company, OU 1, NY
D
1
Mottolo Pig Farm, NH
I
2
South Jersey Clothing, NJ
D
1
South Municipal Water Supply Well, NH
I
3
Defense General Supply Center, OU 5, VA
D
3
Raymark, PA
I
3
Lord-Shope Landfill, PA
D
9
Signetics (AMD 901), TRW OU, CA
I
4
Charles Macon Lagoon, Lagoon #7, OU 1, NC
D
1
Groveland Wells, MA
O
4
JADCO-Hughes, NC
D
1
Wells G&H OU 1, MA
O
5
Hagen Farm, WI
D
2
SMS Instruments (Deer Park), NY
0
5
Fisher Calo Chem, IN
D
3
Tyson's Dump, PA
0
5
Kysor Industrial, MI
D
3
Henderson Road, PA
o
5
Wayne Waste Reclamation, IN
D
5
Verona Well Field, OU 2, MI
0
5
Acme Solvent Reclaiming, Inc. OU 2, IL
D
5
Seymour Recycling, IN
0
5
Main Street Well Field, IN
D
7
Hastings GW Contamination, Well No. 3, NE
0
5
Enviro. Conservation and Chemical (ROD Amendment)
D
7
Waverly Groundwater Contamination, NE
0
5
Chem Central, MI
D
8
Sand Creek Industrial OU 1, CO
0
5
Miami County Incinerator, OH
D
9
IBM (San Jose), CA
0
5
Pristine (ROD Amendment), OH
D
9
Intersil/Siemens, CA
0
5
Muskego Sanitary Landfill, Interim Action OU 1, WI
D
9
Mesa Area Ground Water Contamination, AZ
0
6
Tinker AFB (Soldier Creek Bldg. 3001), OK
D
9
Phoenix-Goodyear Airport Area (North & South Fac), MI
0
7
Hastings GW Contamination (Colorado Ave), NE
D
9
Spectra Physics, OU 1, CA
0
7
Hastings GW Contamination (Far-Mar Co.), NE
D
9
National Semiconductor (Monolithic Memories), CA
0
7
Lindsay Manufacturing, NE
D
9
Solvent Service, CA
0
8
Martin Marietta (Denver Aerospace), CO
D
9
Teledyne Semiconductors, CA
o
8
Chemical Sales Company, OU 1, CO
D
9
Signetics (Advanced Micro Devices 901), CA
0
9
Hassayampa Landfill, AZ
D
9
Monolithic Memories/AMD - Arques, Subunit 2, CA
0
9
Watkins-Johnson, CA
D
9
Van Waters and Rogers, CA
0
9
Pacific Coast Pipeline, CA
D
10
Commencement Bay/S. Tacoma Channel/Well 12A, WA
0
9
Intel, Mountain View, CA
D
2
Upjohn Manufacturing Co., PR
c
9
Fairchild Semiconductor/MTV-I, CA
D
4
Hollingsworth Solderless, FL
c
9
Raytheon, Mountain View, CA
D
5
Verona Well Field (Thomas Solvent/Raymond Road),
c
9
Fairchild Semiconductor/MTV-II, CA
D
8
Rocky Mountain Arsenal OU 18, interim response, CO
c
10
Eielson Air Force Base, AK
D
9
Fairchild Semiconductor (San Jose), CA
c
2
FAA Technical Center, NJ
D/I
9
Sacramento Army Depot, Tank 2 OU, CA
c
4
Carrier Air Conditioning, TN**
D/I
MI
5
Long Prairie Groundwater Contamination, MN
D/I
5
Wausau Groundwater Contamination, WI
D/I
6
South Valley, NM
D/I
1-78
-------
TABLE 1-3. REMEDIAL ACTIONS: PROJECT STATUS June 1993
BY INNOVATIVE TREATMENT TECHNOLOGY (continued)
REGION
SOIL WASHING
STATUS
REGION THERMAL DESORPTION (continued)
STATUS
2
Industrial Latex, OU 1, NJ
PD
2
Ewan Property, NJ
PD
3
Saunders Supply Co, OU 1, VA
PD
4
Benfield Industries, NC
PD
4
Ciba-Geigy (Macintosh Plant) OU 4, AL
PD
5
Moss-American, WI
PD
4
Sangamo/Twelve-Mile/HartwellPCB, OU 1, SC
PD
5
Zanesville Well Field, OH
PD
4
Aberdeen Pesticide Dumps, OU 4, NC
PD
6
Koppers/Texarkana, TX
PD
5
American Chemical Services, IN
PD
9
FMC (Fresno), CA
PD
8
Sand Creek Industrial, OU 5, CO
PD
10
Naval Submarine Base, Bangor Site A, OU 1, WA
PD
2
Sarney Farm, NY
D
2
Myers Property, NJ
D
2
Fulton Terminals, Soil Treatment, NY
D
2
Vineland Chemical, OU 1 and OU 2, NJ
D
2
American Thermostat, NY
D
2
GE Wiring Devices, PR
D
2
Claremont Polychemical - Soil Remedy, NY
D
4
Cabot Carbon/Koppers, FL
D
4
Potter's Septic Tank Service Pits, NC
D
4
Whitehouse Waste Oil Pits (amended ROD), FL
D
4
Ciba-Geigy Corp. (Macintosh Plant) OU 2, AL
D
5
United Scrap Lead/SIA, OH
D
4
Arlington Blending & Packaging Co., OU 1, TN
D
6
Arkwood, AR
D
4
Wamchem, SC
D
6
South Cavalcade Street, TX
D
5
Acme Solvent Reclaiming, Inc. OU 2, IL
D
9
Koppers Company, Inc. (Oroville Plant), CA
D
5
Carter Industries, MI
D
9
Sacramento Army Depot, Oxidation Lagoons OU, CA
D
8
Martin Marietta (Denver Aerospace), CO
D
2
King of Prussia, NJ
D/I
1
Union Chemical Co., OU 1, ME
D/I
4
Cape Fear Wood Preserving, NC
D/I
2
Lipari Landfill Marsh Sediment, NJ
D/I
10
Gould Battery, OR
0
3
U.S.A. Letterkenny SE Area, OU1, PA
D/I
4
Smith's Farm Brooks, OU 1, KY
D/I
1
Re-Solve, MA
I
2
Metaltec/Aerosystems, OU 1 - Soil Treatment, NJ
I
REGION SOLVENT EXTRACTION
STATUS
2
Waldick Aerospace Devices, NJ
0
5
Anderson Development (ROD Amendment), MI
0
2
Ewan Property, NJ
PD
1
Cannon Engineering/Bridgewater, MA
C
1
Norwood PCBs, MA
D
1
Ottati & Goss, NH
C
1
O'Connor, ME
D
1
McKin, ME
C
4
Carolina Transformer, NC
D
5
Outboard MarineAVaukegan Harbor, OU 3, IL
C
6
United Creosoting, TX
D
REGION
OTHER
STATUS
REGION
THERMAL DESORPTION
STATUS
3
Brown's Battery Breaking Site, OU 2, PA
PD
2
Reich Farms, NJ
PD
3
Brown's Battery Breaking Site, OU 2, PA
PD
2
Solvent Savers, NY
PD
3
Tonolli Corporation, PA
PD
1-79
-------
TABLE 1-3. REMEDIAL ACTIONS: PROJECT STATUS
BY INNOVATIVE TOEATMQENT TECHNOLOGY (continued)
June 1993
REGION OTHER (continued) STATUS
3 Brodhead Creek, OU 1, PA PD
6 Petro-Chemical Systems, Inc., OU 2, TX PD
6 Prewitt Abandoned Refinery, NM PD
2 Applied Environmental Services, OU 1, NY D
1 South Municipal Water Supply Well, NH I
-------
TABLE 1-4
REMEDIAL ACTIONS: ESTABLISHED TREATMENT TECHNOLOGIES BY FISCAL YEAR
Table 1-4 shows NPL sites at which established treatment technologies have been selected as part of the remedy. Established treatment
technologies include: incineration, solidification/stabilization, and others. The sites are ordered by fiscal year to give some initial
information on the status of implementation: in general, earlier RODs have progressed furthest in design and construction.
1-81
-------
TABLE 14
REMEDIAL ACTIONS: ESTABLISHED TREATMENT TECHNOLOGIES BY FISCAL YEAR
June 1993
Qn-§ite Incineration
On-Site Incineration (continued)
FY
REGION
SITE NAME
STATE
FY
REGION
SITE NAME
STATE
85
2
Bog Creek Farm
NJ
88
5
Summit National Liquid Disposal
OH
85
2
Bridgeport Rental & Oil
NJ
88
6
Old Midland Products
AR
85
5
ACME Solvent
IL
88
6
Brio Refining
TX
85
6
MOTCO
TX
88
7
Times Beach
MO
88
8
Broderick Wood Products
CO
86
1
Baird & McGuire
MA
86
4
Mowbray Engineering
AL
89
1
Baird and McGuire
MA
86
5
LaSalle Electrical Utilities
IL
89
1
Wells G&H
MA
86
5
Arrowhead Refinery
MN
89
2
Bog Creek Farm
NJ
86
5
Fields Brook
OH
89
2
De Rewal Chemical*
NJ
86
6
Sikes Disposal Pit
T5C
89
3
Douglasville Disposal
PA
89
4
Smith's Farm Brooks*
KY
89
4
Aberdeen Pesticide Dumps/
NC
87
1
Ottati & Goss
NH
Fairway
87
1
Davis Liquid Waste
RI
89
4
Celanese*
NC
87
4
Tower Chemical
FL
89
4
American Creosote Works
TN
87
4
Geiger/C&M Oil
SC
89
5
Ninth Avenue Dump
IN
87
5
Rose Township Dump
MI
89
5
New Brighton/Arden Hills
MN
87
5
Laskin/Poplar Oil
OH
89
5
Big D Campground
OH
87
6
Bayou Bonfouca
LA
89
5
Laskin/Poplar Oil
OH
87
6
Cleve Reber
LA
90
1
New Bedford*
MA
88
1
Rose Disposal Pit
MA
90
2
Saraey Farm
NY
88
2
Lipari Landfill
NJ
90
3
M.W. Manufacturing*
PA
88
2
Love Canal
NY
90
5
Sangamo/Crab Orchard*
IL
88
3
Delaware Sand & Gravel
DE
National Wildlife Refuge
88
3
Southern Maryland Wood
MD
90
5
Fisher Calo
IN
Treating
90
5
Bofors Nobel
MI
88
3
Drake Chemical/Phase M
PA
90
5
Springfield Township Dump*
MI
88
3
Ordnance Works Disposal
WV
90
5
Pristine (Amendment)
OH
88
4
Zellwood Groundwater
FL
90
5
University of Minnesota
MN
88
5
LaSalle Electrical Utilities
IL
90
6
Vertac
AR
88
5
Fort Wayne Reduction
IN
90
6
Texarkana Wood Preserving
TX
88
5
Forest Waste Products
MI
90
7
Missouri Electric Works
MO
88
5
Pristine
OH
* Residuals to be treated with soldiflcation/stabilization.
1-82
-------
JL i a -w ^vynnimvM;
REMEDIAL ACTIONS: ESTABLISHED TREATMENT TECHNOLOGIES BY FISCAL YEAR
Qn-Site Incineration (continued) Off-Site Incineration (continued)
FY
REGION
SHE NAME
STATE
FY
REGION
SITE NAME STATE
90
7
Hastings Groundwater
NE
86
3
Westline
PA
Contamination (East Industrial
86
5
Metamora Landfill
MI
Park)
86
5
Spiegelberg Landfill
MI
90
10
FMC Yakima Pit
WA
86
7
Ellisville Area/Bliss
MO
91
3
Whitmoyer Labs, Inc. OU3
PA
87
2
Williams Property
NJ
91
3
Eastern Diversified Metals
PA
87
4
Sodyeco
NC
91 '
4
Ciba Geigy Corp.
AL
87
6
Sand Springs Petrochemical
OK
91
5
Allied Chem & Ironton Coke
OH
Complex
92
4
Alabama Army Ammunition Plant
AL
88
1
Cannon Engineering/Plymouth
MA
(Operable Unit 1)
88
2
Ewan Property
NJ
92
5
Savanna Army Depot
IL
88
2
Reich Farms
NJ
92
6
Gulf Coast Vacuum Services
LA
88
2
Brewster Well Field
NY
(Operable Unit 1)
88
3
Wildcat Landfill
DE
88
3
Berks Sand Pit
PA
88
3
Douglassville Disposal
PA
Off Site Incineration
88
3
Fike Chemical
WV
88
5
Belvidere Municipal
IL
FY
REGION
SITE NAME
STATE
Landfill #1
88
6
S. Calvacade St.
TX
84
5
Berlin & Farro Liquid
MI
88
7
Minker/Stout/Romaine Creek
MO
Incineration
(R&S)
84
5
Laskin/Poplar Oil
OH
88
7
Syntex
MO
84
10
Western Processing
WA
Phase I
89
1
W.R. Grace (Acton Plant)
MA
89
1
O'Connor
ME
85
2
Swope Oil & Chemical
NJ
89
1
Pinette's Salvage Yard
ME
85
5
Byron/Johnson Salvage
DL
89
2
Claremont Polychemical
NY
Yard
89
3
M.W. Manufacturing
PA
85
6
Triangle Chemical
TX
89
3
Whitmoyer Laboratories
PA
85
8
Woodbury Chemical
CO
89
4
Newsom Brothers Old Reichold
MS
86
3
Drake Chemical/Phase II
PA
89
5
Cross Brothers Pail
IL
89
5
Outboard Marine/Waukegan Harbor
IL
* Residuals to be treated with soldificatioa/stabilization.
1-83
-------
TABLE 14 (continued)
REMEDIAL ACTIONS: ESTABLISHED TREATMENT TECHNOLOGIES BY FISCAL YEAR
June 1993
Off-Site Incineration (continued^
Off-Site Incineration (continued
FY
REGION
SITE NAME STATE
FY
REGION
SITE NAME STATE
89
5
Wedzeb
IN
91
4
Aberdeen Pesticide Dumps
89
5
Cliff/Dow Dump
MI
(Amendment)
NC
89
5
Alsco Anaconda
OH
91
4
Wrigley Charcoal
TN
89
6
United Creosoting
TX
91
5
Acme Solvent Reclaiming Inc.
IL
89
8
Woodbury Chemical
CO
91
5
Main Street Wellfield
IN
91
5
Thermo Chem
MI
91
5
Carter Industries
MI
90
1
Beacon Heights Landfill
CT
91
5
Summit National Liquid Disposal
90
1
Kearsarge Metallurgical
NH
Service (Amendment)
OH
90
2
FAA Technical Center
NJ
91
6
Petrochemical (Turtle-Bayou)
TX
90
2
Hooker Chemical-Ruco Polymer
NJ
91
7
Peoples Natural Gas
IA
90
2
Sayreville landfill
NJ
91
7
Ellisville Area Site
MO
90
2
Mattiace Petrochemicals
NY
91
7
Ellisviile Area (Amendment)
MO
90
2
Sealand Restoration
NY
91
7
Kem-Pest Laboratories
MO
90
3
Greenwood Chemical*
VA
91
8
Broderick Wood Products
CO
90
6
Arkwood
AR
91
8
Hill AFB
UT
90
6
Jacksonville Municipal Landfill
AR
91
9
Advanced Micro Devices Inc.
CA
90
6
Rogers Road Municipal Landfill
AR
91
10
Commencement Bay - Nearsbore/
90
6
Hardage/Criner (Amendment)
OK
Tideflats
WA
90
7
Fairfield Coal Gasification
IA
91
10
Northwest Transformer - Mission
WA
Plant
Pole
90
7
Shenandoah Stables
MO
90
8
Martin Marietta (Denver Aerospace)
CO
90
8
Sand Creek Industrial
CO
92
2
Ellis Property
NJ
90
8
Ogden Defense Depot
UT
92
3
Fike Chemical
WV
92
5
American Chemical Services
IN
92
8
Ogden Defense Depot (Operable
UT
91
1
Union Chemical
ME
Unit 3)
91
2
Curcio Scrap Metal
NJ
92
9
Westinghouse Electric (Sunnyvale
CA
91
2
Swope Oil
NJ
Plant)
91
2
Waldick Aerospace Devices, Inc.
NJ
92
10
Pacific Hide & Fur Recycling
ED
91
2
Circuitron
NY
(Amendment)
91
2
Mattiace Petrochemical
NY
92
10
U.S. DOE Idaho National
ID
91
3
Brodhead Creek
PA
Engineering Lab (Operable Unit 23)
91
3
Eastern Diversified Metals
PA
91
3
Dixie Cavern County Landfill
VA
* Residuals to be treated with soldifkation/stabilization.
1-84
-------
REMEDIAL ACTIONS: ESTABLISHED TREATMENT TECHNOLOGIES BY FISCAL YEAR
Solidification/Stabilization
FY REGION SITE NAME STATE
82 3 Bruin Lagoon PA
84 6 Bioecology Systems TX
85 4 General Refining GA
85 4 Davie Landfill FL
85 10 Western Processing/Phase II WA
86 2 Marathon Battery NY
86 3 Bruin Lagoon PA
86 4 Pepper's Steel & Alloy FL
86 4 Sapp Battery Salvage FL
86 5 Burrows Sanitation MI
86 5 Forest Waste Products MI
87
i
Davis Liquid Waste
RI
87
2
Chemical Control
NI
87
2
Myers Property
NJ
87
2
Waldick Aerospace
NJ
87
4
Gold Coast
FL
87
4
Geiger/C&M Oil
SC
87
4
Independent Nail
SC
87
4
Palmetto Wood Preserving
SC
87
5
Liquid Disposal
MI
87
5
Northern Engraving
WI
87
6
Gurley Pit
AR
87
6
Mid-South Wood
AR
87
6
Cleve Reber
LA
87
6
Sand Spring Petrochemical
OK
Complex
88 1 Charles George Land Reclamation MA
Solidification/Stabilization (continued)
FY
REGION
SITE NAME
STATE
88
2
Love Canal
NY
88
2
Marathon Battery
NY
88
2
York Oil
NY
88
3
Alladin Plating
PA
88
3
Fike Chemical
WV
88
4
Brown Wood Preserving
FL
88
4
Flowood
MS
88
4
Chemtronics
NC
88
5
Velsicol Chemical
IL
88
5
Mid-State Disposal Landfill
WI
88
6
Industrial Waste Control
AR
88
6
Bailey Waste Disposal
TX
88
6
Brio Refining
TX
88
6
French Limited
TX
88
7
Midwest Manufacturing/
IA
North Farm
88
9
Selma Pressure Treating
CA
88
10
Pacific Hide & Fur Recycling
ID
88
10
Gould
OR
88
10
Commencement Bay/NTF
WA
88
10
Frontier Hard Chrome
WA
89
1
Sullivan's Ledge
MA
89
1
W.R, Grace (Acton Plant)
MA
89
1
O'Connor
ME
89
2
DeRewal Chemical
NJ
89
2
Marathon Battery
NY
89
3
Craig Farm
PA
89
3
Douglassville Disposal
PA
89
3
Hebelka Auto Salvage Yard
PA
89
3
Ordnance Works Disposal
WV
89
4
Kassouf-Kimerling Battery
FL
89
4
Smith Farm Brooks
KY
89
4
Cape Fear Wood Preserving
NC
89
4
Celanese
NC
89
4
Amnicola Dump
TN
1-85
-------
FY
89
89
89
89
89
89
89
89
90
90
90
90
90
90
90
90
90
90
90
90
90
90
90
9.0
90
90
90
90
90
TABLE 1-4 (continued)
REMEDIAL ACTIONS: ESTABLISHED TREATMENT TECHNOLOGIES BY FISCAL YEAR
June 1993
Solidification/Stabilization (continued!
REGION SITE NAME STATE
5 MTDCOI IN
5 MIDCOII IN
5 Auto Ion Chemicals MI
6 Pesses Chemical TX
6 Sheridan Disposal Services TX
7 Vogel Paint & Wax IA
9 Koppers (Oroville Plant) CA
9 Purity Oil Sales CA
1 New Bedford MA
2 Roebling Steel NJ
3 M.W. Manufacturing PA
3 C&R Battery VA
3 Greenwood Chemical VA
4 62nd Street Dump FL
4 Cabot/Koppers FL
4 Coleman-Evans Wood Preserving FL
(Amendment)
4 Kassourf-Kimerling Battery FL
Disposal
4 Schuylkill Metal FL
4 Yellow Wate Road FL
4 Zellwood Groundwater FL
Contamination (Amendment)
5 Sangamo/Crab Orchard IL
National Wildlife Refuge
5 Wayne Waste Oil IN
5 Springfield Township Dump MI
5 Oconomowoc Electroplating WI
6 Jacksonville Municipal Landfill AR
6 Rogers Road Municipal Landfill AR
7 Shenandoah Stables MO
7 Hastings Groundwater Contamination NE
(East Industrial Park)
8 Martin Marietta (Denver " CO
Aerospace)
SoHdiffcation/Slabillzatioo (continued)
FY
REGION
SITE NAME
STATE
90
8
Rocky Mountain Arsenal (OU 17)
CO
90
9
J.H. Baxter
CA
90
10
Teledyne Wah Chang Albany (TWCA)OR
91
1
Silresin Chemical
MA
91
1
Sullivan's Ledge
MA
91
1
Union Chemical
MA
91
2
Asbestos Dump
NJ
91
2
Nascolite Corp.
NJ
91
2
NL Industries
NJ
91
2
Roebling Steel
NJ
91
2
Waldick Aerospace Services Inc.
NJ
91
2
White Chemical Corp.
NJ
91
3
Halby Chemical
DE
91
3
Mid-Atlantic Wood Preservers
MD
91
3
Eastern Diversified Metals
PA
91
3
Hebelka Auto Salvage Yard
PA
91
3
Whitmoyer Lab (OU3)
PA
91
3
Whitmoyer Lab (OU2)
PA
91
3
U.S.A. Letterkenny SE
PA
91
3
First Piedmont Quarry 719
VA
91
3
Saunders Supply
VA
91
4
Interstate Lead Co.
AL
91
4
USAF Robins Air Force Base
GA
91
4
Maxey Flats Nuclear Disposal
KY
91
4
Golden Strip Septic Tank
SC
91
4
Aberdeen Pesticide Dump
NC
(Amendment)
91
4
Carolina Transformer
NC
91
4
Arlington Blending and
TN
Packaging Co.
91
4
Oak Ridge OU3
TN
91
4
Wrigley Charcoal
TN
91
5
Acme Solvents
IL
91
5
Carter Industries
MI
91
6
Cimarron Mining Corp.
NM
1_Q£
-------
FY
91
91
91
91
91
91
92
92
92
92
92
92
92
92
92
92
92
92
92
92
92
92
92
92
92
92
92
92
92
92
92
92
TABLE 1-4 (continued)
REMEDIAL ACTIONS: ESTABLISHED TREATMENT TECHNOLOGIES BY FISCAL YEAR
June 1993
Solidification/Stabilization (continued)
REGION SITE NAME STATE
1
2
2
2
3
3
3
3
3
3
IE Dupont de Nemours & Co., Inc. IA
Mid-America Tanning IA
Shaw Avenue Dump IA
Anaconda Co. Smelter MT
FMC (Fresno Plant) CA
Valley Wood Preserving CA
PSC Resources MA
Cosden Chemical Coatings NJ
Facet Enterprises NY
Preferred Plating NY
Abex VA
C & D Recycling PA
Fike Chemical WV
Paoli Rail Yard PA
Rhinehart Tire Fire Dump VA
Tonolli PA
FY
REGION
SITE NAME
STATE
92
6
Gulf Coast Vacuum Services
LA
(Operable Unit 1)
92
6
Oklahoma Refining
OK
92
8
Broderick Wood Products
CO
92
8
Denver Radium (Operable Unit 8)
CO
92
8
Portland Cement (Kiln Dust #2 & #3)UT
92
8
Rocky Flats (USDOE) (Operable
CO
Unit 4)
92
8
Silver Bow CreekButte Area
MT
92
9
Rhone-Poulenc/Zoecon
CA
92
10
Bunker Hill Mining and
ID
Metallurgical Complex
92
10
Pacific Hide & Fur Recycling
ID
(Amendment)
92
10
U.S. DOE Idaho National
ID
Engineering Lab (Operable Unit 22)
4
Agrico Chemical
FL
4
Ciba-Geigy (Mcintosh Plant)
AL
Other
4
Florida Steel
FL
4
JFD Electronics/Channel Masters
NC
FY
REGION
SITE NAME
STATE
TECHNOLOGY
4
Marine Corps Logistics Base
GA
4
Savannah River (USDOE)
SC
85
6
Triangle Chemical
TX
Soil Aeration
(Operable Unit 1)
87
3
West Virginia Ordnance
WV
In situ Flamming
4
Whitehouse Waste Oil Pits
FL
88
3
Bendix Flight System
PA
Soil Aeration
(Amendment)
88
7
Arkansas City Dump
KS
Chemical
5
Electrovoice
Ml
89
9
Intel, Mountain View
CA
Soil Aeration
5
H. Brown Company
MI
89
9
Raytheon, Mountain View
CA
Soil Aeration
5
Peerless Plating
MI
90
4
Howe Valley Landfill
KY
Soil Aeration
5
Savanna Army Depot
IL
92
3
Fike Chemical
WV
Neutralization
5
Spickler Landfill
WI
92
6
Double Eagle Refinery
OK
Neutralization
5
Tar Lake
MI
92
6
Fourth Street Abandoned
OK
Neutralization
6
Cal West Metals
NM
Refinery
6
Double Eagle Refinery
OK
92
6
Oklahoma Refining
OK
Neutralization
6
Fourth Street Abandoned Refinery
OK
1-87
-------
THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
1-88
-------
TABLE 1-5
REMEDIAL ACTIONS: TREATMENT TRAINS WITH INNOVATIVE TREATMENT TECHNOLOGIES
Table 1-5 lists the sites at which innovative treatment technologies are used together with established or other innovative treatment
technologies in treatment "trains." Technologies may be combined to reduce the volume of material requiring further treatment, to prevent
the emission of volatile contaminants during excavation and mixing, or to address multiple contaminants in a single medium.
1-89
-------
TABLE 1-5. REMEDIAL ACTIONS: TREATMENT TRAINS WITH INNOVATIVE TECHNOLOGIES June 1953
Dechlorination Followed by
Soil Washing Myers Property NJ
Ex Situ Bioremediation Followed bv
Solidification/Stabilization Whitmoyer Laboratories, OU 3 PA
Solidification/Stabilization J. H. Baxter CA
Solidification/Stabilization Cape Fear Wood Preserving NC
In Situ Flushing Followed bv
In Situ Bioremediation LA Clarke & Sons VA
In Situ Bioremediation Pester Burn Pond KS
Soil Vapor Extraction Followed bv
In Situ Bioremediation Swope Oil & Chemical Co. NI
In Situ Flushing JADCO - Hughes NC
In Situ Flushing Pasley Solvents and Chemicals, Inc. NY
Solidification/Stabilization Genzale Plating Company, OU 1 NY
Soil Washing Zanesville Well Field OH
Soil Washing Followed bv
Bioremediation American Creosote FL
Bioremediation Cabot Carbon/Koppers FL
Bioremediation Whitehouse Waste Oil Pits FL
Bioremediation Benfield Industries NC
Bioremediation Cape Fear Wood Preserving NC
Bioremediation Moss-American WI
Bioremediation Koppers (Oroville) CA
Soil Washing Followed bv (continued)
Incineration Arkwood AR
Incineration South Cavalcade Street TX
Incineration Sand Creek, OU 5 CO
Solidification/Stabilization FMC (Fresno) CA
Solvent Extraction Followed bv
Incineration United Cresoting TX
Soil Washing Ewan Property NI
Solidification/Stabilization O'Connor ME
Thermal Desorption Followed bv
Dechlorination Resolve MA
Dechlorination Arlington Blending & Packaging TN
Co., OU 1
Dechlorination Smith's Farm Brooks, OU 1 KY
Incineration of Organic Vapors Sarney Farm NY
Incineration of Organic Vapors Outboard Marine/Waukegan Harbor IL
Incineration of Organic Vapors Carter Industries MI
Incineration of Organic Vapors University of Minnesota MN
Incineration of Organic Vapors Martin Marietta (Denver Aerospace) CO
Solidification/Stabilization Waldick Aerospace Devices NJ
Solidification/Stabilization USA Letterkenny (SE Area, OU 1) PA
Solidification/Stabilization Acme Solvent Reclaiming, Inc., OU 2 IL
Solidification/Stabilization Carter Industries MI
Solidification/Stabilization Martin Marietta (Denver Aerospace) CO
1-90
-------
TABLE 1-6
REMEDIAL ACTIONS: PERFORMANCE DATA ON COMPLETED PROJECTS
Table 1-6 provides summary information on the performance and operating parameters for applications of innovative treatment
technologies that have been completed at remedial sites. It is intended to supplement, not replace, the information included in tables
1-1,1-2, and 1-3.
1-91
-------
TABLE 1-6
REMEDIAL ACTIONS: PERFORMANCE DATA ON COMPLETED PROJECTS
June 1993
Region
Site Name, State, Dates
of Operation
Technology/
Vendor
Media Treated
(Quantity)
Key Contaminants
Treated
Operating
Parameters
Materials
Handling
Required
Residuals
Management
Conments
1
Cannon Engineering/HA
5/90 to 10/90
Thermal soil
aeration/
Canonie
Environmental
Services Corp.,
Porter, IN
Soil (11,300
tons)
Criteria:
0.1 ppm - TCE, DCE,
PCE
0.2 ppm - Toluene,
Xylene
0.5 ppm - Vinyl
chloride
SVOCs - 3ppm (total)
Input 500 - 3,000
ppm (Total VOCs)
Output - <0.025 ppm
(Total VOCs)
Continuous
operation
40 tons/hr
450 - 500° F
Moisture content
before treatment -
5% - 25X moisture
Additives - dry
soil (to reduce
moisture content)
Excavation
Screening
Mixing
Dewatering
Residuals from
air pollution
control -
treated on
site, disposed
of off site
Wastewater -
treated on
site, disposed
of off site
The waste feed size
limitation for the
equipment, 1.875
inches, was an
important
consideration.
More information is
available in the RA
report available from
Region 1.
1
McKin, HE
7/86 to 2/87
Thermal
desorption/
Canonie Env.
Services Corp.,
Porter, IN
Soi I
(11,500 cy to a
depth of 10 ft.)
VOCs Criteria:
0.1 ppm TCE
Input:
up to 1,000 ppm TCE
Output: 0.1 ppm
Continuous
operation
6-8 minutes
retention time
300°F
Excavation
Soils -
Solidified and
disposed onsite
Vapors -
Air carbon
capture
1
Ottati & Goss, NH
6/89 to 9/89
Thermal
desorption/
Canonie
Engineering
Soil (6,000 cy)
TCE, PCE, DCA,
Benzene
Criteria: 1 ppm -
Total VOCs
and
<100 ppb - Each
individual VOC
Output: <1ppm -
Total VOCs
Batch process
Excavation
Screening
Carbon from air
pollution
control unit
regenerated
offsite
For more information
on this project, see
the close out report
available from Region
1.
Newly added or completed projects
1-92
-------
TABLE 1-6
REMEDIAL ACTIONS: PERFORMANCE DATA ON COMPLETED PROJECTS (continued)
June 199:
egiori
Site Name, State, Dates
of Operation
Technology/
Vendor
Media Treated
(Quantity)
Key Contaminants
Treated
Operating
Parameters
Materials
Handling
Required
Residuals
Management
Comments
2
Wide Beach Development,
MY
9/90 to 9/91
APEG
dechlorination/
Soil Tech
Denver, CO
Soil (40,000 ey>
Criteria:
PCB - <10 ppm (1
composite
sample/day)
Input - 10 to 100
ppm PCB
Output - 2 ppm PCB
Continuous process
8 tons/hour
200° - 580"C (450°
- 1100-F)
Ambient pH and
moisture
Additives -
Alkaline
polyethylene
glycol (APEG)
Excavation
Screening
Staging
Treated soil -
disposed of on
site
If on-site disposal is
planned, perform tests
of the treated
material appropriate
to intended use.
For further
information on this
dechlorination
project, see the
Demonstration Test
Report produced by
Region 2. EPA.
2
Upjohn Manufacturing
Company, PR
1/83 to 3/88
Soil Vapor
Extraction
Terra Vac, Inc.
Costa Mesa, CA
Soil (16,000 sq
ft to
approximately
100 ft deep)
Criteria:
Initially:
Undefined, end point
of treatment was
subject to long
debate.
Final criteria:
Carbon tetrachloride
(in exhaust
stacks) -
nondetectable for
three consecutive
months
Initial
concentrations - 70
ppm (carbon
tetrachloride to
air)
Final concentrations
- nondetect (<0.002
ppm)
Ambient conditions
Discharge of
soil vapors
through 30-ft
stack
For further
information on this
application, see the
Applications Analysis
Report for the Terra
Vac In situ Vacuum
Extraction System
(EPA/540/A5-89/003).
1-93
-------
TABLE 1-6
REMEDIAL ACTIONS: PERFORMANCE DATA ON COMPLETED PROJECTS (continued)
June19£
Region
Site Hame, State, Dates
of Operation
Technology/
Vendor
Hedia Treated
(Quantity)
Key Contaminants
Treated
Operating
Parameters
Materials
Handling
Required
Residuals
Management
Comments
4
Broun Hood Preserving,
FL
10/88 to 12/91
Land treatment/
Remediation
Technologies,
Seattle,
Washington
Soil/pond
sediment (7,500
cy>
Criteria:
100 ppm total
carcinogenic PAHs as
sampled on 8
subplots on each
lift
Input - 800 to 2,000
ppm total creosote
contaminants
Output - 10 to 80
ppm total
carcinogenic
indicators
Retention tine - 3
to 6 months
Additives - water
and nutrients
Excavation
Screening
Tilling
Treated
material
vegetated with
grass (no cap)
Further information on
this project is
available from the
Remedial Action Close
Out Report. The
vendor, RETEC, is
expected to prepare a
paper.
4
Palmetto Wood
Preserving, SC
9/28/88 to 2/8/89
Chemical
treatment and
soil washing
Reduction of
hexavalent
chromium to
trivalent
chromium
En-site (ERGS
contractor)
Atlanta, GA
Soil (13,000 cy}
Health-based
criteria - Actual
concentrations
unknown
Input:
Arsenic - 2 to 6,200
PPm
Chromiun - 4 to
6,200 ppm
Output:
Arsenic - less than
1 ppm
Chromium - 627 ppm
Soil - Batch
process
Treatment for
aqueous waste from
soil washing - 25
gallons per minute
pH - 2 to 9
Neutralization
Hixing
Dewatering
Soil -
solidified and
replaced on
site
Wastewater -
permitted
discharge to
the sewer line
Sludges - off
site disposal
(1) Used sodium meta-
phosphate to lower pH
to 2.0 and wash the
Chromium from the
soil, (2) separated
the soil and solution,
(3) solidified the
soils, and (4) used
the ferrous ion method
of reduction to
precipitate the
chromium from solution
in trivalent form.
This treatment system
is unique in the
method of generating
ferrous ion for the
reducing step. The
waste stream passed
through an
electrolytic cell
containing consumable
steel electrodes where
the ferrous ions were
electrically
introduced into the
waste stream.
1-94
-------
June 1£
Regi on
Site Name, State, Dates
of Operation
Technology/
Vendor
Media Treated
(Quantity)-
Key Contaminants
Treated
Operating
Parameters
Materials
Handling
Requi red
Residuals
Management
Comments
4 #
Hollingsworth
Solderless, FL
1/91 to 7/91
Soil vapor
extraction
EBASCO
SoiI 60 cy (down
to 7 feet deep)
TCE, vinyl chloride
Target: total VOCs
1 ppm
In situ
None required
Air emissions
vented to
atmosphere
Design specifications
were very critical.
Need to pay close
attention to design
specifications
5
Seymour Recycling, IN
Sumner - 1990
August-October, 1986
January-February, 1987
In situ soil
bioremediation
ABB
Environmental
Services
Soi I
(12 acres to 10
ft deep,
approximately
43,500 cy)
54 contaminants
present, including
TCE, TCA, and Carbon
Tetrachloride
No standards or
criteria for this OU
in ROD
Additives -
nitrogen,
phosphorus,
potassium, sulfur
as fertilizer
(200,000 gallons
of nutrients
added)
T i11i ng
Capping in
place
The soil became
saturated quickly
during this project,
creating surface
pools. The specially
designed tractor got
stuck.
5
Outboard Marine/Uaukegan
Harbor (OU #3), IL 1/92
to 7/92
Thermal
Desorption
Canonie
Environmental
Servi ces
Porter, IN
Soil/Sediments
(16,000 cy)
PCBs
Initial 20,000 -
10,000 ppm 99%
removal
Continuous with a
retention time of
15 minutes and
throughput of 8-10
tons/hr.
Temperature 1100°F
Moisture content
20% or less Soda
ash added to waste
to meet DRE of
99.9999%
Excavation
Mixing
Dewatering
Cleaned soil
and sediment
stored in on-
site
containment
cells. Uaste
water
discharged to
POTW.
Reduced PCB levels
much more than
expected.
1-95
-------
TABLE 1-6
REMEDIAL ACTIONS: PERFORMANCE DATA ON COMPLETED PROJECTS (continued)
Juns 1!
Region
Site Name, State, Dates
of Operation
Technology/
Vendor
Media Treated
(Quantity)
Key Contaminants
Treated
Operating
Parameters
Materials
Handling
Required
Residuals
Management
Comments
5
Verona Weir field
(Thomas Solvent/Raymond
Road), MI
March 1988 to Hay 1992
Soil vapor
extraction
(attempted
ni trogen
sparging)
Terra Vac, Inc.
Costa Mesa, CA
Soil (35,000 cy,
1/2 acre to 18
ft. deep)
Initial soil
concentration
TCE 550,000 ppb; PCE
1.8 million ppb;
Toluene 730,000 ppb;
Xylene 500,000 ppb
Criteria in all post
remedial soil
samples; Total
Xylenes 6,000 ppb;
Toluene 15,000 ppb;
Benzene 20 ppb;
Ethylbenzene 14,000
ppb; 1,1- DCE 10
ppb; trans-1,2-0CE
2,000 ppb; 1,1,1-TCA
4,000 ppb; Carbon
tet., 10 ppb; 1,2-
DCA 10 ppb; 1,1-DCA
20 ppb; Methylene
chloride 100 ppb;
cis-1,2 DCE 20 ppb;
PCE 10 ppb; TCE 60
PPk
60 - 160 cu ft/min
of air
Started >4,400
lbs/day removed
Shut off 5 lbs/day
removed
Total removed
65,000 lbs
Ho materials
handling;
requi red
installing
extraction
wells
Spent carbon
was regenerated
(and eventually
incinerated)
Initial estimate of
7,000 lbs of VOCs
product too low.
Treatment equipment
undersized. Needed
better quant if icatiot
of VOCs in soils to
design appropriate
size.
Plan for enhancing
system to deal with
saturated soils and
free product.
Public information
available includes
performance report,
and technical memo.
8 #
Rocky Mountain Arsenal
(OU 18) Interim
Response, CO
June 1991 to
December 1991
Soil vapor
extraction
Vapor phase
carbon
adsorption to
capture vapors
Uoodward Clyde
Denver, CO
Soil (100 ft
radius doun to
60 ft;
approximately
70,000 cy)
TCE
Initial extracted
gas concentration 60
ppm
Final extracted gas
concentration
2 to 3 ppm
250-300 cu.
ft./min. of air
Total removed 64
lbs.
No materials
handling;
requi red
installing
extraction
wells
Vapors captured
on carbon
Sampling indicated tl
presence of TCE main1
in the soil gas
samples and not the
soil samples
9
Fair Child
Semiconductor
San Jose, CA
1989 to June 1990
Soil vapor
extraction with
air flushing
Carbon canister
air stripping
for pump and
treat
Soil (10,000 cy)
Initial
concentration TCA
670,000 ppb; 1,1-DCE
6,400 ppb freon 113
7,200 ppb
Final concentrations
unknown
Target was 1 ppm
In situ
Excavation
dewatering of
soil where
leaking UST
was discovered
Hill re-evaluate the
remediation in 1994.
1-Qfi
-------
t nMbb a -v
REMEDIAL ACTIONS; PERFORMANCE DATA ON COMPLETED PROJECTS (continued)
June 1J
Region
Site Name, State, Dates
of Operation
Technology/
Vendor
Media Treated
(Quantity)
Key Contaminants
Treated
Operating
Parameters
Materials
Handling
Requi red
Residuals
Management
Comments
9 #
Sacramento Army Depot
Tank 2 Operable Unit, CA
11/91 to 4/93
In-situ soil
vapor
extractfon,
extracted vapor
treated with "
gas phase
carbon
adsorption,
entrained
(suspended)
water treatment
by the existing
on-site UV-
hydrogen
peroxide
treatment
plant/Terra
Vac, Inc.
Costa Mesa, CA
Soil (150 cy)
VOCs (Ethylbenzene,
PCE, MEK
Total Xylenes)
Initial concentra-
tion:
MEK 0.011 - 15 tng/kg
Ethylbenzene 0.006 -
2,100 mg/kg
PCE 0.006 - 39 mg/kg
Total Xylene 0.005 -
11,000 mg/kg
Clean up goal
1.2 mg/kg MEK
6 mg/kg Ethylbenzene
23 mg/kg total
Xylene
0.2 mg/kg PCE
24 hours/day
None
Extracted vapor
treated with
gas phase
carton
adsorption
entrained
(suspended)
water treatment
by the existing
on-site UV-
hydrogen
peroxide
treatment plant
1-97
-------
Chapter 2
Superfund Removal Actions
-------
THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
-------
SUPERFUND REMOVAL ACTIONS
Superfund removal actions are conducted in response to an immediate
threat caused by a release of hazardous substances. Removal action
decisions are documented in an action memorandum. To date, innovative
treatment technologies have been used in relatively few removal actions.
The innovative technologies addressed in this report have been used 33
times in 28 removal actions (Figure 2-1). In addition, infrared incinera-
tion, no longer considered innovative, was first used at two removal
actions.
Many removals involve small quantities of waste or immediate threats
requiring quick action to alleviate the hazard. Often, such activities do
not lend themselves to on-site treatment approaches. In addition, SARA
does not prescribe the same preference for innovative treatment for
removals that it does for remedial actions.
EPA would like to increase the use of innovative treatment methods to
address removal problems. One of the seven initiatives set forth in the
EPA directive described in the foreword concerns removal actions. It is
expected that innovative treatment technologies will be used more often
in the future, for larger, and less time-critical removal actions.
Table 2-1 provides detailed information for each application of an
innovative technology at a removal site. Tables 2-2 and 2-3 provide
summaries by EPA Region and status for all applications of innovative
technologies at removal sites. Table 2-4 lists removal sites using
established treatment technologies.
Frequency of Technology Selection
Figure 2-1 lists each type of innovative treatment technology and
indicates how often that technology has been selected as a remedy for
removal actions. Figure 2-1 illustrates that chemical treatment was
selected most often and represented 21 percent of all applications of
innovative treatment technologies at removal sites. Bioremediation (ex
situ) was chosen six times and represented 18 percent of all applications
of innovative treatment technologies at removal sites.
FIGURE 2-1
SUPERFUND REMOVAL ACTIONS:
SUMMARY OF INNOVATIVE TECHNOLOGIES SELECTED/USED AS OF JUNE 1993
(Total = 33)
Dechlorination (Liquids) (3) 9% Solvent Extraction (2) 6%
S ~
In Situ Vitrification (1) 3%
Thermal Desorption (2) 6%
Chemical Treatment (7) 21%
Soil Vapor Extraction (4) 12%
Soil Washing (2) 6%
Ex Situ Bioremediation* (6) 18
Other (2) 6% In Situ Bioremediation (4) 12%
Afofe; Data from a survey of EPA Regional Removal Branch chiefs and On-Scene Coordinators. (} Number of times this technology was selected or used.
* Includes one in situ groundwater treatment
2-1
-------
Status of Innovative Technology Implementation
Figure 2-2 indicates the status of innovative treatment technologies
that are being applied at removal action sites. Since removals are
responses to an immediate threat and often involve smaller quantities
of hazardous wastes than remedials, the implementation of the tech-
nology may progress faster at a removal site than at a remedial site.
The figure indicates that a large percentage, 58 percent, of removal
projects involving innovative treatment technologies have been com-
pleted. Table 2-3 summarizes removal action sites using innovative
treatment technologies by status and specific technology. Table 2-5
provides detailed information on removal projects that have been
completed.
FIGURE 2-2
SUPERFUND REMOVAL ACTIONS:
PROJECT STATUS OF INNOVATIVE TREATMENT TECHNOLOGIES AS OF JUNE 1993*
Technology
Predesign /
In Design
Design Complete/Being
Installed/ Operational
Project Completed
Total
Soil Vapor Extraction
0
1
3
4
Thermal Desorption
1
o
1
2
Ex Situ Bioremediation
1
3
2
6
In Situ Bioremediation*
0
2
2
4
Soil Washing
0
1
1
2
In Situ Flushing
0
0
0
0
Dechlorination
0
1
2
3
Solvent Extraction
0
0
2
2
In Situ Vitrification
0
1
0
1
Other Innovative Treatment
1
1
0
2
Chemical Treatment
0
1
6
7
TOTAL
3 (9%)
11(33%)
19(58%)
33
• Data derived from a survey of EPA Superfund Removal Branch Chiefs and On-Scene Coordinators for each Region,
0 Includes one in situ groundwater treatment
2-2
-------
Contaminants Addressed by Innovative Treatment Technologies
Figure 2-3 provides information, by technology, for three major
contaminant groups treated at removal action sites; volatile organic
compounds (VOC), semi volatile organic compounds (SVOC), and
metals. For this report, compounds are categorized as VOCs or
SVOCs, using the lists provided in EPA's SW-846 Test Methods
8240 and 8270, respectively.
Treatment Trains
Innovative treatment technologies in this report may be used together
with established or other innovative treatment technologies in treat-
ment trains. Technologies may be combined to reduce the volume of
material requiring further treatment, to prevent the emission of
volatile contaminants during excavation and mixing, or to address
multiple contaminants in a single medium. Table 2-4 lists the sites at
which such treatment trains are being used.
FIGURE 2-3
SUPERFVND REMOVAL ACTIONS: APPLICATION OF INNOVATIVE TREATMENT TECHNOLOGIES
10
¦¦ VOCs
ED SVOCs
11 11 Metals
$
0
ttJS777
Soil Vapor
Extraction
Thermal
Desorption
Bio-
remediation
Solvent
Extraction
Soil
Washing
Chemical
Treatment
Innovative Technology
2-3
-------
THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
2-4
-------
TABLE 2-1
REMOVAL ACTIONS: SITE-SPECIFIC INFORMATION BY INNOVATIVE TREATMENT TECHNOLOGY
Table 2-1 is the principal part of this chapter. It contains the most detailed, site-specific information for removal sites for which innovative
treatment technology has been selected. The columns of Table 2-1 present the following information:
Region
This column indicates the EPA Region in which the site is located.
Site Name, State, Action Memo Date
This column identifies the site and the operable unit for which an innovative treatment technology was selected.
An action memorandum documents the selection of remedy in the removal program. The date shown in this column is the date on which
an action memorandum was signed by an EPA official.
An asterisk (*) in this column indicates that a treatability study has been completed for this technology at the particular site.
Specific Technology
The second column describes the specific technology selected within a general category of innovative treatment. For example, within the
general category of bioremediation, the specific technologies of land treatment or slurry-phase bioremediation may be chosen.
Site Description
This column provides information on the industrial source of the contamination at the site and allows analysis of the selection of innovative
technologies by site type. For example, by using the information in this column, one may determine the most frequently selected innovative
technology for wood preserving sites.
Media (quantity)
This column provides information on the media and quantity of material to be treated. If a treatment is used in situ, an effort has been made
to include the maximum depth of the treatment to provide the reader with another parameter significant to the application.
2-5
231
e
-------
TABLE 2-1 (Continued)
Key Contaminants Treated
The major contaminants or contaminant groups targeted by the treatment technology are shown in this column. There may be other
contaminants as well that will be treated. Other contaminants that may be present, but that are not being addressed by the listed technology,
are not included.
Status
This column indicates the status of the application of the innovative treatment technology. Predesign indicates that the ROD has been
signed but design has not begun. During predesign, EPA may be negotiating with the potentially responsible parties, procuring the
services of a design firm, or collecting information (such as conducting a treatability study) needed in the design stage. If a project is
in design, the engineering documents needed to contract for and build the remedy are being prepared. If a remedy is being installed,
the lead agency has signed a contract for the construction work needed to set up the remedy. The remedy is operational if it is completely
installed and it is now being operated as a treatment system; the remedy is completed if the goals of the ROD or decision document for
that treatment technology have been met and treatment has ceased.
One purpose of this column is to identify opportunities for vendors to become involved in the next phase of the projects. Whenever
possible, the season and year that the current phase will end is given. This information is identified as the "completion planned" date.
Lead Agency, Treatment Contractor
The "lead" indicates whether federal dollars are to be used to implement the remedy (Fund lead) or the potentially responsible parties
will conduct the remedy with EPA/State oversight (PRP lead). If a remedy is Fund lead, EPA may manage the design/construction through
its contractors, the state may manage the project with Superfund dollars, or the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (US ACE) may act for EPA
to manage the design or construction. Whichever agency or organization is responsible for managing the remedy, the contractor
responsible for the actual installation and operation of the innovative technology also is identified, if the lead agency has selected a
contractor.
Contacts/Phone
This final column provides the names and telephone numbers of useful contacts for the site or technology. The first name listed is usually
the EPA on-scene coordinator (OSC) responsible for the site. If a remedy is being managed by the state, the name and phone number
of the state RPM also is provided. Information on any other useful contacts is provided.
2-6
-------
13Die z-1
Removal Actions: Site-Specific Information By Innovative Treatment Technology
June 19S
Bioremediation (Ex situ)
Region
Site Name, State,
(Action Memo Date)
Specific
Technology
Site Description
Media (Quantity)
Key Contaminants
Treated
Status#
Lead Agency
and Treatment
Contractor (if
•available)
Contacts/Phone
2
GCL Tie and Treating,
NY
(3/26/91)
Composting
Wood preserving
Soil (4,800 cy)
PAHs (Creosote)
In design;
Pilot study
currently in
progress
Federal
lead/Fund
Financed;
ERT/REAC
Joe Cosentino
908-906-6983
4
Southeastern Wood
Preserving, MS
C09/30/90)
See also Soil Washing
Slurry phase
(preceded by
soil washing)
Wood preserving
Soil (8,000 cy)
PAHs (Creosote)
Operational;
Completion
planned
December 1993
Federal
lead/Fund
Financed; OHM
Remediation
Services Corp
Don Rigger
404-347-3931
5
Indiana Wood Treating,
IN
(10/11/92)
Composting
Wood preserving
Soil <18,000 cy)
PAHs (Creosote)
Operational;
Completion
planned Fall
1993; After 6
months 8 of 9
compost piles
be low
treatment
target levels.
PRP
lead/Federal
oversight; IT
Corporation,
CMC, Inc. -
subcontractor
Steve Faryan
312-353-9351
6
MacMillan Ring Free
Oil Company*, AR
(11/09/92)
Solid phase
Petroleum refining
and reuse
Sediments (38,000
cy)
VOCs (8TEX), PAHs
(DAF Float)
Design
completed but
not installed;
Completion
planned Fall
1993; Waiting
for contractor
selection
Federal
lead/Fund
Financed
Charles Fisher
214-655-2224
7
Scott Lumber, HO
(07/10/87)
Land treatment
Wood preserving
Soil (16,000 cy)
SVOCs (Phenols),
PAHs
(Benzo(a)pyrene)
Completed;
Operational
from 1987 to
Fall 1991
Federal
lead/Fund
Financed;
Remediation
Technologies
Bruce Morrison
913-551-5014
9
Poly-Carb, NV
(05/14/87)
See also Soil Washing
Land treatment
Commercial waste
management
Soil (1,500 cy)
SVOCs (Phenols),
PAHs (Cresol)
Completed;
Operational
from 7/87 to
8/88
Federal
lead/Fund
Financed;
Reidel
Environmental
Services
Bob Mandel
415-744-2290
¥ Status as of June 1993. See Table 2-5 for performance and operational data on completed removal projects.
* Indicates that a treatability study has been completed.
-------
Table 2-1
Removal Actions; Site-Specific Information By Innovative Treatment Technology
June 19!
Bioremediation (In situ)
Region
Site Name, State,
(Action Hemo Date)
Specific
Technology
Site Description
Hedia (Quantity)
Key Contaminants
Treated
Status#
Lead Agency
and Treatment
Contractor (if
available)
Contacts/Phone
4
CSX HcCormick
Emergency Response
See also Soil Vapor
Extraction
In situ ground
uater
Derailment (30,000
gallon spill)
Groundwater
VOCs (BETX)
Operational
PRP
lead/Federal
oversight;
Kemron
Steve SpurIin
404-347-3931
6
Baldwin Waste Oil, TX
(07/01/92)
In situ soil
Waste oil recycler
Soil (550 cy)
VOCs (BTEX), PAHs
(TPH)
Operational;
Coupletion
planned Fall
1993
Federal
lead/Fund
Financed;
Ecology &
Environment,
RSKERL (EPA),
Reidel
Envi ronmental
Gary Guerra
214-665-6608
9
Gila River Indian
Reservation, AZ
(07/31/84)
See also Chemical
Treatment
In situ soil
Preceded by
chemical
treatment
Drun storage/
disposal
Soil (3,200 cy)
Biocides
(Toxaphene, Ethyl
and Methyl
Parathion)
Completed;
Operational
from 6/85 to
10/85
PRP
lead/Federal
oversight
Richard Hartin
414-744-2288
9
Roseville Drums, CA
(03/03/88)
In situ soil
Midnight Dump on
Dirt Road
Soil (14 cy)
SVOCs
(Dichlorobenzene,
Phenols)
Completed;
Fall 1988;
Operational
from 2/88 to
11/88
Federal
lead/Fund
Financed
Brad Shipley
415-744-2287
2-8
-------
i aoie 1
Removal Actions: Site-Specific Information By Innovative Treatment Technology
June 19:
Chemical Treatment
Region
Site Name, State,
(Action Memo Date)
Specific
Technology
Site Description
Media (Quantity)
Key Contaminants
Treated
Status#
Lead Agency
and Treatment
Contractor (if
available)
Contacts/Phone
2
Vi net arid Chemical, NJ
(09/28/92)
Chemical
Treatment
Pesticide
manufacturing/use
/storage
Solids (100 lb)
Metals (Mercury)
Completed;
December 1992;
Operation
completed in
one month
Federal
lead/Fund
Financed; Ensco
Don Graham
908-321-4345
Steve Brawtey
(Ensco)
706-278-1195
2
Zhiegner Refining
Company, NJ
Chemical
T reatment
Precious metal
recovery
Solids (100 lb)
Metals (Mercury)
Completed;
Summer 1993;
Operational
from 2/93 to
6/93
Federal
lead/Fund
Financed; Ensco
Dilshad Perera
908-321-4356
Steve Brawtey
(Ensco)
706-278-1195
3
Avtex Fibers, VA
(11/14/89)
Chemical
T reatment
Rayon
manufacturing
faciIity/wastewate
r treatment
Sludge 39,000 gl)
Organics (Carbon
disulfide)
Completed;
August 1991
Federal
lead/Fund
Financed; OH
Materials
Vincent Zenone
215-597-3038
5
PBM Enterprises (Van
Dusen Airport
Service), HI
(04/10/88)
Oxidation using
Sodium
•Hypochlorite
Silver Recovery
Facility
Solids (quantity
unknown)
Organic Cyanides
Completed;
Operational
from 5/85 to
10/85
Federal
lead/Fund
Financed;
American
Environmental
Service, Inc.
Ross Powers
312-378-7661
8
Mouat Industries*, MT
(09/20/91)
Reduction using
sulfuric acid
and ferrous
sulfate
Metal ore mining
and smelting
Soil (47,000 cy)
Metals (Chromiun
IV)
Operational;
Completion
planned Spring
1994;
Operation
started June
1993
PRP
lead/Federal
oversight;
Baker
Environmental
Tien Nguyen
303-297-7120
9
Gila River Indian
Reservation, AZ
(07/31/84)
Set also
Bioremediation (In
Situ)
Reduction using
sodium hydroxide
Drum storage/
disposal
Soil (3,200 cy)
Biocides
(Toxaphene, Ethyl
and Methyl
Parathion)
Completed;
Operational
from 4/85 to
10/85
Federal
lead/Fund
Financed
Richard Haft in
414-744-2288
2-9
-------
Table 2-1
Removal Actions: Site-Specific Information By Innovative Treatment Technology
June 199
Chemical Treatment (continued)
Region
Site Hone, State,
(Action Memo Date)
Specific
Technology
Site Description
Media (Quantity)
Key Contaminants
Treated
Status#
Lead Agency
and Treatment
Contractor (if
available)
Contacts/Phone
9
Stanford Pesticide #1,
AZ
(04/20/87)
Chemical
treatment-
alkaline
hydrolysis
Pesticide
manufacturing/use
/storage, Farm
Equipment Storage
Soil (200 cy)
Biocides (Methyl
Parathion)
Completed;
Operational
from 7/87 to
9/87
Federal
lead/Fund
Financed;
Crosby and
Overton
Dan Shane
415-744-2286
2-10
-------
Removal Actions: Site-Specific Information By Innovative Treatment Technology June 199c
Dechlorination
Region
Site Name, State;
(Action Memo Date)
Specific
Technology
Site Description
Media
(Quantity)
Key
Contaminants
Treated
Status#
Lead Agency
and Treatment
Contractor (if
available)
Contacts/Phone
2
Signo Trading/Mt,
Vernon, NY
(12/19/865
Dechlorination
Waste Management
Facility Warehouse
Sludge 15 gl5
Dioxins (2,3,7,8
TCMJ- laden
herbicides)
Completed;
Operational
during
October, 1987
Federal
lead/Fund
Financed;
Galson Research
Corp
(subcontractor
to OHM)
Charles
Fitzsiirmons
201-321-6608
6
Fruitland Drum, NM
(09/08/905
Dechlorination
Operat i on/ma intenance
facility
Liquid (150 gl5
VOCs, Siocides,
Dioxins
(2,4,5-T), PAHs
Design
completed but
not installed;
Completion
planned Fall
1993; BCD was
selected after
APEG/KPEG was
unsuccessful
Federal
lead/Fund
Financed; USEPA
ERT/RREL
Craig Carlton
214-655-2220
7
Crown Plating, HO
(08/29/895
Dechlorination
Electroplating
Liquid (55 gl5
Biocides
(si I vex; 2,4,5
TP)
Completed;
Operational
from 10/ 89 to
12/89
Federal
lead/Fund
Financed
Mark Roberts
913-236-3881
2-11
-------
Table 2-1
Removal Actions: Site-Specific Information By Innovative Treatment Technology
June 199
In Situ Vitrification
Region
Site Heme, State,
(Action Hemo Date)
Specific
Technology
Site Description
Kedia (Quantity)
Key Contaminants
Treated
Status#
Lead Agency
and Treatment
Contractor (if
available)
Contacts/Phone
5
Parsons Chemical (ETH
Enterprise), HI
(09/21/90)
In situ
Vitrification
Agricultural
chemical facility
Soil (3,000 cy)
Biocides,
Dioxins, Metals
(Mercury)
Operational;
Completion
planned Fall
1993; First
full-scale
application of
in situ
vitrification
at a hazardous
waste site
Federal
lead/Fund
Financed;
Geosafe Corp.
Len Zintak
312-886-4246
O.IO
-------
Table 2-1
Removal Actions: Site-Specific Information By Innovative Treatment Technology June 199:
Soil Vapor Extraction
Region
Site Name, State,
(Action Memo Date)
Specific
Technology
Site Description
Media (Quantity)
Key Contaminants
Treated
Status#
Lead Agency
and Treatment
Contractor (if
available)
Contacts/Phone
4
Basket Creek Surface
Impoundment*, GA
(04/11/91)
Soil vapor
extraction ex
situ, used on a
soil pile
Surface
impoundment used
for disposal of
solvents
Soil (2,000 cy)
VOCs (TCE, PCE,
MEK, MI8K,
Toluene, Xylene,
Benzene)
Completed;
Operational
from 11/92 to
2/93
Federal
lead/Fund
Financed; OHM
Don Rigger
404-347-3931
4
CSX McCormick
Derailment Site, SC
See also
Bioremediation (In
Situ)
Soil vapor
extraction with
air flushing
Derailment (30,000
gallon spill)
Soil (200,000 cy)
VOCs (BETX)
Completed;
PRP
lead/Federal
oversight;
Midwest
Research
Institute
Steve Spurlfn
404-347-3931
4
Hinson Chemical, SC
(11/28/88)
Soil vapor
extraction with
air flushing
Waste Reclaiming
Facility
Soil (60,000 cy)
VOCs
Completed;
March 1992;
Operational
December 1988
through March
1992
Federal
lead/Fund
Financed; OH
Materials
Fred Stroud
404-347-3136
8
Mystery Bridge
Road/Highway 20, OU
2*, WY
Emergency Response
See also Other
Technologies
Soil vapor
extraction
Natural gas
compressor station
Soil (160,000 cy)
VOCs (Benzene)
Operational
PRP
lead/Federal
oversight;
Adrian Brown
Consultants
Bert Garcia
303-293-1526
2-13
-------
Table 2-1
Removal Actions: Site-Specific Information By Innovative Treatment Technology
June 1993
Soil Washing
Region
Site Hame, State,
(Action Memo Date)
Specific
Technology
Site Description
Media (Quantity)
Key Contaminants
Treated
Status#
Lead Agency
and Treatment
Contractor (if
avallable)
Contacts/Phone
4
Southeastern Hood
Preserving, MS
09/30/90)
See also
Bioremediation (Ex
situ)
Soil washing
(sand removal,
foilowed by
bioremediation
of fines
Wood preserving
Sludge quantity
(unknown), Solids
(8,000 cy)
SVOCs, PAHs
(Creosote)
Operational;
Completion
planned Winter
1993
Federal
lead/Fund
Financed; OHM
Remediation
Services Corp.
Don Rigger
404-347-3931
9
Poly-Carb, NV
(05/14/87)
See also
Bioremediation (Ex
Situ)
Soil washing
Commercial waste
management
Soil (1,500 cy)
SVOCs (Phenols),
PAHs (Cresol)
Completed;
Operational
7/87 to 8/88
FederaI
lead/Fund
Financed;
Reidet
Envi rormental
Servi ces
Bob. Handel
415-744-2290
2-14
-------
Table 2-1
Removal Actions: Site-Specific Information By Innovative Treatment Technology
June 199
Solvent Extraction
Region
Site Name, State,
(Action Memo Date)
Specific
Technology
Site Description
Media (Quantity)
Key Contaminants
T reated
Status#
Lead Agency
and Treatment
Contractor (if
available)
Contacts/Phone
4
General Refining*, GA
(08/13/85)
Solvent
extraction
Waste oil
recycling facility
Sludge 2,700 cy),
Solids (700 cy),
Soil (6,600 gl)
PCBs
Completed;
Operational
from 8/86 to
2/87
Federal
lead/Fund
F i nanced;
Resource
Conservation
Co.
Shane Hitchcock
404-347-3136
6
Traband Warehouse, OK
(01/01/88)
Solvent
Extraction
Storage Management
Complex
Solids (quantity
unknown)
PCBs
Completed;
Project ended
in February,
1989
Federal
lead/Fund
Financed;
Terra-Clean
Pat Hanmack
214-655-2270
2-15
-------
Table 2-1
Removal Actions: Site-Specific Information By innovative Treatment Technology
June 199
Thermal Desorption
Region
Site Name, State,
(Action Mean Date)
Specific
Technology
Site Description
Media (Quantity)
Key Contaminants
Treated
Status#
Lead Agency
and Treatment
Contractor (if
available)
Contacts/Phone
4
FCX-Washington Site,
NC
(12/04/91)
Thermal
Desorption
Pesticide
manufacturing/use
/storage
Soil (5,000 cy)
Biocides
(Chlordane,
Methoxyclor, DDT,
DOE)
Predesign;
Original
action memo
specified
incineration;
revised action
tneow will be
completed in
Fall 1993
Federal
lead/Fund
Financed
Paul Peronard
404-347-3931
10
Drexler - RAMCOR*, WA
(09/30/91)
Thermal
Desorption
Waste oil recycler
Soil (3,000 cy)
VQCs (BTEX), PAHs
(Petroleum
hydrocarbons)
Completed;
Operational
from 7/92 to
8/92
Federal
lead/Fund
Financed; Four
Seasons
Chris Field
206-553-1674
2-16
-------
Removal Actions: Site-Specific Information By Innovative Treatment Technology June 1995
Other
Region
Site Name, State,
(Action Memo Date)
Specific
Technology
Site Description
Media (Quantity)
Key Contaminants
Treated
Status#
Lead Agency
and Treatment
Contractor (if
available)
Contacts/Phone
2
Imperial Oil Company,
NJ
(09/29/92)
Viscous fluid
extraction
Former Uaste Oil
Recycler
Soil (quantity
unknown),
Groundwater
VOCs, PCBs, PAHs
Being
installed;
Installation
completion
planned Fall
1993;
Operational by
Fall 1993
Federal
lead/Fund
Financed;
Enivronmental
Technology of
North America
Louis DiGuardia
908-906-6927
8
Mystery Bridge
Road/Highway 20, OU
2*. WY
See also Soil Vapor
Extraction
Air Sparging
Natural gas
compressor station
Groundwater
VOCs (Benzene)
In design;
Design
completion
planned Sunnier
1993;
Pilot-scale is
currently
operating
PRP
lead/Federal
oversight;
Adrian Brown
Consultants
Bert Garcia
303-293-1526
2-17
-------
THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
2-18
-------
TABLE 2-2
REMOVAL ACTIONS: INNOVATIVE TREATMENT TECHNOLOGIES BY EPA REGION
Table 2-2 summarizes the innovative treatment technologies used at sites where removal actions were conducted in each
EPA region.
2-19
-------
TABLE 2-2. REMOVAL ACTIONS: INNOVATIVE TREATMENT TECHNOLOGIES
BY EPA REGION
June 1993
TECHNOLOGY
SITE NAME
STATE
TPniNAT AilV
1 fcCHnUiAAyi
REGION 2
TOWNS
Chemical Treatment
Vineland Chemical
NJ
Bioremediation (Ex situ)
MacMillan Ring Free Oil Company
AR
Chemical Treatment
Zhiegner Refining Company
NJ
Dechlorination
Fruitland Dram
NM
Viscous fluid
Imperial OE Company
NJ
Solvent Extraction
Traband Warehouse
OK
extraction
Bioremediation (In situ)
Baldwin Waste Oil
TX
Bioremediation (Ex situ)
GCL Tie and Treating
NY
Dechlorination
Signo Trading/Mt. Vernon
NY
REGION 1
REGION 3
Bioremediation (Ex situ)
Scott Lumber
MO
Dechlorination
Crown Plating
MO
Chemical Treatment
Avtex Fibers
VA
REGION 8
REGION 4
Chemical Treatment
Mouat Industries
MT
Solvent Extraction
General Refining
GA
Soil Vapor Extraction
Mystery Bridge Road/Highway 20
WY
Soil Vapor Extraction
Basket Creek Surface Impoundme
GA
Air Sparging
Mystery Bridge Road/Highway 20
WY
Bioremediation (Ex situ)
Southeastern Wood Preserving
MS
Soil Washing
Southeastern Wood Preserving
MS
Thermal Desorption
FCX-Washington Site
NC
Bioremediation (In situ)
CSX McCormick Derailment Site
SC
REGION 9
Soil Vapor Extraction
CSX McCormick Derailment Site
SC
Soil Vapor Extraction
Hinson Chemical
SC
Bioremediation (In situ)
Gila River Indian Reservation
AZ
Chemical Treatment
Gila River Indian Reservation
AZ
Chemical Treatment
Stanford Pesticide #1
AZ
Bioremediation (In situ)
Roseville Drums
CA
REGION 5
Bioremediation (Ex situ)
Poly-Carb
NV
Soil Washing
Poly-Carb
NV
Bioremediation (Ex situ)
Indiana Wood Treating
IN
Chemical Treatment
PBM Enterprises (Van Dusen Airport)
MI
REGION 10
la situ Vitrification
Parsons Chemical (ETM Enterprises)
MI
Thermal Desorption
Drexler - RAMCOR
WA
2-20
-------
TABLE 2-3
REMOVAL ACTIONS: PROJECT STATUS BY INNOVATIVE TREATMENT TECHNOLOGY
Table 2-3 lists the applications of innovative treatment technologies at removal sites by technology and summarizes the status of the
specific application. The symbols used in this table are:
PD - In predesign: A site may be considered to be in predesign if EPA is negotiating the consent decree for the design with
the responsible party, the lead agency is preparing the predesign report, the lead agency is contracting for the design
firm, or the lead agency is conducting a treatability study or field investigation before beginning actual design work.
D - In design: A site is considered to be in design after the design contractor has begun work.
D/I - Design completed but not installed: This symbol is used if the design work has been completed but Installation work
had not yet begun at the time of publication of this report.
I - Being installed: An innovative treatment technology is "being installed" from the time the construction contract has
been awarded until the time the treatment system has begun operation. For some technologies, this is a relatively short
phase of the project, because such projects are quickly assembled on site. For other technologies, the period of
installation lasts several construction seasons.
O - Operational: A treatment technology is operational once it has been constructed and has been proven to be functional.
The length of time required to complete the operation phase depends on such factors as the nature of the technology,
the quantity of material to be treated, and the concentrations of the contaminants at the start of treatment.
C - Completed: A treatment technology project is considered to be completed when the operation of the treatment
technology ceases. Other site activities still may be planned or ongoing.
2-21
m
-------
TABLE 2-3. REMOVAL ACTIONS: PROJECT STATUS
BY INNOVATIVE TREATMENT TECHNOLOGY
REGION BIOREMEDIATION (EX SITU)
REGION DECHLORINATION
6 Fruitland Drum, NM
2 Signo Trading/Mt. Vernon, NY
7 Crown Plating, MO
STATUS
2 GCL Tie and Treating, NY
D
6 MaeMillan Ring Free Oil Company, AR
D/I
4 Southeastern Wood Preserving, MS
0
5 Indiana Wood Treating, IN
0
7 Scott Lumber, MO
C
9 Poly-Carb, NV
c
REGION BIOREMEDIATION (IN STTO
STATUS
4 CSX McCormick Derailment Site, SC
0
6 Baldwin Waste Oil, TX
0
9 Gila River Indian Reservation, AZ
C
9 Roseville Drums, CA
c
REGION CHEMICAL TREATMENT STATUS
8 Mouat Industries, MT 0
2 Vineland Chemical, NJ C
2 Zhiegner Refining Company, NI C
3 Avtex Fibers, VA C
5 PBM Enterprises (Van Dusen Airport Service), MI C
9 Gila River Indian Reservation, AZ C
9 Stanford Pesticide #1, AZ C
STATUS
D/I
C
C
REGION IN SITU VITRIFICATION
5 Parsons Chemical (ETM Enterprise), MI
REGION SOIL VAPOR EXTR ACTION
8 Mystery Bridge Road/Highway 20, OU 2, WY
4 Basket Creek Surface Impoundment, GA
4 CSX McCormick Derailment Site, SC
4 Hinson Chemical, SC
REGION SOIL WASHING
4 Southeastern Wood Preserving, MS
9 Poly-Carb, NV
REGION SOLVENT EXTRACTION
4 General Refining, GA
6 Traband Warehouse, OK
REGION THERMAL DESORPTION
4 FCX-Washington Site, NC
10 Drexler - RAMCOR, WA
REGION OTHER
8 Mystery Bridge Road/Highway 20, OU 2, WY
2 Imperial Oil Company, NJ
June 1993
STATUS
O
STATUS
O
C
C
C
STATUS
O
C
STATUS
C
C
STATUS
PD
C
STATUS
D
I
2-22
-------
TABLE 2-4
REMOVAL ACTIONS: TREATMENT TRAINS WITH INNOVATIVE TREATMENT TECHNOLOGIES
Table 2-4 lists the at which innovative treatment technologies are used together with established or other innovative treatment
technologies in treatment "trains." Technologies may be combined to reduce the volume of material requiring further treatment, to
prevent the emission of volatile contaminants during excavation and mixing, or to address multiple contaminants in a single medium.
2-23
-------
TABLE 2-4. REMOVAL ACTIONS: TREATMENT TRAINS WITH INNOVATIVE TECHNOLOGIES June 1953
Chemical Treatment Followed bv
In Situ Bioremediation Gila River Indian Reservation AZ
In Situ Flushing Followed bv
In Situ Bioremediation Polycarb NV
Soil Washing Followed bv
Bioremediation Southeastern Wood Preserving MS
Solvent Extraction Followed bv
Solidification/Stabilization General Refining GA
2-24
-------
TABLE 2-5
REMOVAL ACTIONS; PERFORMANCE DATA ON COMPLETED PROJECTS
Table 2-5 provides summary information on the performance and operating parameters for applications of innovative treatment
technologies that have been completed at removal sites. It is intended to supplement, not replace, the information included in tables
2-1,2-2, and 2-3.
2-25
-------
TABLE 2-5
REMOVAL ACTIONS: PERFORMANCE DATA ON COMPLETED PROJECTS
June 199:
Region
Site Name, State, Dates
of Operation
Technology/
Vendor
Media Treated
(Quantity)
Key Contaminants
Treated
operating
Parameters
Materials
Handling
Required
Residuals
Management
Comments
2
Signo Trading
International, Inc., NY
10/20/87 to 10/21/87
(Removal)
KPIG
dechlorination/
Galson
Remediation,
Syracuse, NY
Sludge (15
gallons)
Dfoxin
Input - 135 ppb
Output - 1 ppb
Temperature;
150"C
Time: Overnight
Hone
Incineration of
residuals
(without dioxin
contamination)
at treatment,
storage, and
disposal
facility
2 #
Vineland Chemical
Company, NJ
12/92
{Removal)
Kercury
pretreatment
preclpiated
mercury salts
into mercury
sulfide so that
the mercury can
be recovered
and recycled.
ENSCO
Solid 100 lbs
Htrcury initial
concentration >10%
mercury
Final concentration
of mercury in
recyclable
precipitate was
greater than 80%.
Less than 260 ppm if
mercury in thatn
nonrecycled salt.
Added salt to
precipitate the
mercury
None
Residual salts
containing less
than 260 pm
mercury Here
incinerated
off-site
First known Superfund
site where this
process has been
applied
2 #
Zhiegner Refining
Company {Removal)
2/93 - 6/93
Mercury
pretreatment
preclpiated
mercury salts
into mercury
sulfide so that
the mercury can
be recovered
and recycled.
ENSCO
Solid 100 lbs
Hercury initial
concentration >10%
mercury
Final concentration
of mercury in
recyclable
precipitate was
greater than 80%.
Less than 260 ppm if
mercury .in thatn
nonrecycled salt.
Added salt to
precipitate the
mercury
None
Residual salts
containing less
than 260 pm
mercury Here
incinerated
off-site
No comments
Newly added or completed projects
2-26
-------
I HOLE <£.-3
REMOVAL ACTIONS: PERFORMANCE DATA ON COMPLETED PROJECTS (continued) June 199;
Region
Site Name, State, Dates
of Operation
Technology/
Vendor
Media Treated
(Quantity)
Key Contaminants
Treated
Operating
Parameters
Materials
Handling
Requi red
Residuals
Management
Ccmments
3
Avtex fibers, VA
4/90 to 8/91
(Removal)
Chemical
treatment
(oxidation
using NaClo)
OH Materials,
Findlay, OH
(ERCS
Contractor)
Sludge/water
from storage
unit (2 million
gallons)
Carbon disulfide
Criteria: <10 ppm -
Carbon disulfide in
the effluent
Input: 50-200,000
ppm Carbon disulfide
Output: <10 ppm
Carbon disulfide
Batch operation
average retention
time - 1 hour
pH - 10
Additives: Sodium
hypochloride.
The retention time
and reagent feed
rates increased
with increasing
concentration of
sludge in the
contaminated
water.
Pumping
Salts from the
reaction were
removed with
flocculation
and clarifi-
cation at
existing
treatment
plant, pH
adjustment
Carbon disulfide is
unstable and will be
found with other
contaminants in
aqueous waste stream.
For additional
information on this
project, see the
Removal Close Out
Report available from
EPA - Region III or OH
Materials.
4
General Refining
Company, GA
August-October, 1986
January-February, 1987
(Removal)
Solvent
extraction
Resource
Conservation
Technology
Company,
Bellevue, WA
Sludge (3,448
tons)
Input:
PCB - 5.0 ppm
Lead - 10,000 ppm
Output:
PCB - insignificant
Lead - concentrated
in solids
Continuous
operation
Time: 2 hours
pH: 10
Temp: 20"C
Rate: 27 tons/day
Moisture content -
60%
Additives:
Sodium hydroxide
Triethylamine
Excavation
Screening
Neutralization
Size Reduction
Mixing
Oil - used as
fuel for kiln
Hater -
treated,
discharged off
site
Solids -
solidified and
disposed of on
site
The oil recovered from
the extractions
process could not be
sold because of an
elevated metals
content. The solvent
could not be recovered
due to leaks in system
seals. The unit
required a relatively
uniform material so
materials handling of
the sludges proved
difficult in the
beginning of the
project. The lead-
bearing solids
produced by the dryer
also required special
handling. Finally,
detergents in the
sludge hindered
oil/water separation.
Newly added or completed projects
2-27
-------
TABLE 2-5
REMOVAL ACTIONS: PERFORMANCE DATA ON COMPLETED PROJECTS (continued)
June 1992
Region
Site Heme, State, Dates
of Operation
Technology/
Vendor
Media Treated
(Quantity)
Key Contaminants
Treated
Operating
Parameters
Materials
Handling
Required
Residuals
Management
Comments
4
Hins on Chemical, SC
12/88 to 3/92 (Removal)
Soil vapor
extraction
OH Materials
Atlanta, GA
Soil
(60,000 cy, up
to 50 ft deep)
Benzene, TCE, PCE,
DCA, MEK
At completion:
<10 ppm Total VOCs
(In all samples);
average <1 ppm Total
VOCs
In situ;
continuous
operation (except
for occasional
shut downs to
allow soil gas to
reach equilibrium
in the pore
spaces)
Air emissions
captured on
vapor phase
carbon
No cap needed
4 #
CSX HcCormtck Derailment
Site, S.C.
(Removal)
Soil vapor
extraction with
air flushing
MWRI
Soil (200,000
cy)
Benzene-toluene-
ethylbenzene-xylene
(BTEX)
130,000 gallon spill
Used a system of
extraction and
injection wells.
1,000 separate PVC
wells. Injection
wells 7 to 8 feet
deep. Extraction
wells 2-3 feet
deep. Vapors
captured and put
through a knock
out pot and
incinerated.
Brought in
clay to cover
the area, to
prevent air
from
infiltrating
Residual
wastewater sent
off-site for
treatment
System was successful
in decreasing concen-
tration to cleanup
goals. Had
difficulties due to
fluctuation of shallow
ground water. Did not
anticipate the change
in ground water to be
as drastic as it was.
It decreased the
efficiency, less
vapors and more water.
Now need to address
ground water. Could
have used the soil
vapor extraction in a
more limited area.
f Newly added or completed projects
2-28
-------
REMOVAL ACTIONS: PERFORMANCE DATA ON COMPLETED PROJECTS {continued}
June 1993
legion
Site Name, State, Dates
of Operation
Technology/
Vendor
Media Treated
(Quantity)
Key Contaminants
Treated
Operating
Parameters
Materials
Handling
Required
Residuals
Management
Comments
4 #
Basket Creek Surface
Impoundment, GA
11/92 - 2/93 (Removal)
Vacuum
extraction of
soil pile with
horizontal
wells (ex-situ)
OHM
Soil (2,000 cy)
VOCs
TCE, PCE, HEtC, MIBK,
BTEX
High 33% VOCs
Average 1-5%
Criteria;
TCE - 0.5 mg/L TCLP
PCE - 0,7 mg/L TCLP
AIT VOCs met TCLP
limits
Vacuum pressure
monitored. 1,300
CFM/Manifold
3 manifold
6-7 wells/manifold
Surface im-
poundment used
for disposal
of waste
solvents.
Built an
enclosure over
the site.
Excavated the
soil and
screened it
with a power
screen.
Stacked on PVC
extraction
wells.
Recovered VOCs
with duct work
and fan.
Vapors
incinerated.
Residual soils
and rejects
from screening
met TCLP limits
and were
disposed as
unhazardous as
on RCRA
Subtitle 0
landfill.
Incinerated
70,000 lbs of
VOCs
$2,000,000 total
costs. PermeabiIi ty
in-situ soil was not
good at first.
Excavation and ex-situ
treatment improved
permeability.
Shouldn't rule out if
you can't do in situ.
5
PBM Enterprises, MI
3/25/85 to 10/28/85
(Removal)
Neutralization
with
hypochlorite
process
Mid-American
Environmental
Service,
Riverdale, II
Film chips (464
tons or 1,280
cy)
Cyanide
Input: 200 ppm
Output: 20 ppm
Time: 2-3 hours
Additives: sodium
hydroxide
Agitation
Rinse water,
runoff and
waste
hypochlorite -
treated off
site
Treated chips -
landfilled
(Subtitle 0)
6
Traband Warehouse
PCfls, OK (Removal)
2/90 to 9/90
Solvent
Extraction/
Terra Kleen
Solids
PCBs
Initial:. 7,500 ppm
Newly added or completed projects
2-29
-------
TABLE 2-5
REMOVAL ACTIONS: PERFORMANCE DATA ON COMPLETED PROJECTS (continued)
June 1993
Region
Site Hame, State, Dates
of operation
Technology/
Vendor
Hedia Treated
(Quantity)
Key Contaminants
Treated
Operating
Parameters
Materials
Handling
Required
Residuals
Management
Comments
7
Crown Plating, HO
10/1/89 to 12/31/89
{Removal)
Dechlorination
using the KPEG
process
EPA removal
contractor
Liquid (5
gallons)
Criteria:
Dioxin - <1 ppb
Input:
Silvex - 10,000 ppm
Dioxin equivalents -
24.18 ppb
Output:
Silvex - 32 ppb
Dioxin equivalents -
0.068 ppb
Batch operation
Retention time -
36 hours
(including time of
equipment
breakdown)
Temperature - 72°C
pH - 13
Moisture content -
100%
Built an on-
site vacuus for
emissions
control
Contaminated
residual oil
incinerated
off-site
7
Scott Lumber, HO
8/87 - Fall, 91
(Removal)
Land Treatment
RETEC
Chapel Hill, NC
Soil (16,000 cy)
Criteria:
500 ppm - Total PAH
14 ppm -
Benio(a)pyrene
Output:
160 ppm Total PAH
12 ppm
Benzo(a)pyrene
Additives:
Water
phosphates
Tilling
None
Mewl v artdpd or rnmril nrniArt*
MO
-------
June 19!
Region
Site Name, State, Dates
of Operation
Technology/
Vendor
Media Treated
(Quantity)
Key Contaminants
Treated
Operating
Parameters
Materials
Handling
Required
Residuals
Management
Comments
9
Gila River Indian
Reservation, AZ
3/28/85 to 6/24/85
(Removal)
In situ
chemical
treatment
(followed by
anaerobic bio-
remediation)
EPA removal
contractor
Soil (3,220 cy)
Input:
Toxaphene - 1,470
ppm
Ethyl parathion - 86
ppm
Hethyl parathion -
24 ppm
Output:
Toxaphene - 470 ppm
Ethyl parathion - 56
ppm
Methyl parathion - 3
PPm
pH: 10.2 to 11.8
Moisture: wet
Additives to soil:
Sodium hydroxide,
Water
Bioremediation
9
Gils River Indian
Reservation, AZ
6/24/85 to 10/23/85
(Removal)
In situ
anaerobic
biological
treatment
(preceded by
chemical
treatment)
EPA removal
contractor
Soil (3,220 cy)
Toxaphene
Input: 470 ppm
Output: 180 ppm
pH: 8.3 to 9.8
Additives to soil:
Sulfuric acid,
manure, sludge
Tilling
Capped in place
The biological
treatment would have
been more successful
if the neutralizatloi
after the chemical
treatment had been
more complete. The
tearing of the plast
sheets covering the
soils allowed air in
and prevented
anaerobic activity-
9
Roseville Drums, CA
2/12/88 to 11/9/88
(Removal)
In situ
Bioremediation
EPA removal
contractor
Soil (14 cy)
Input:
Dichlorobenzene -
4,000 ppm
Phenol - 12,000 ppm
Output:
Dichlorobenzene -
140 ppm
Phenol - 6 ppm
Additives to soil:
manure, water
Tilling
# Newly added or completed projects
2-31
-------
TABLE 2-5
REMOVAL ACTIONS: PERFORMANCE DATA ON COMPLETED PROJECTS (continued)
June 19!
Region
Site Hante, State, Dates
of Operation
Technology/
Vendor
Kedia Treated
(Quantity)
Key Contaminants
Treated
Operating
Parameters
Materials
Handling
Required
Residuals
Management
Comaents
9
Stanford Pesticide Site
#1, AZ
3/20/87 to 11/4/87
(Removal)
Chemical
treatment -
alkaline
hydrolysis
EPA removal
contractor
Soil <200 cy)
Hethyl parathion
Input: 24.2 ppm
Output: 0.05 ppm
pH: 9.0
Hoisture: wet
Additives to soil:
soda ash, water,
activated carbon
Tilling
(in situ, 3
times per
week)
9
Poly-Carb, Inc., NV
7/22/87 to 8/16/88
(Removal)
Land treatment
and soil
washing
EPA removal
contractor
Soil (1,500 cy)
Input:
Phenol 1,020 ppra
o-cresol - 100 ppm
m- and p-cresol -
409 ppm
Output:
Phenol - 1 ppm
o-cresol - 1 ppm
m- and p-Cresol -
0.92 ppm
Additives: water
Excavation
Placement in
double-lined
pit
Irrigation
Tilling
leachate
collection and
treatment with
granular
activated
carbon
This treatment used
both bioremediation
and soil flushing in
one step.
10 #
Drexler-RAMCOR, WA
7/92 to 8/92
(removal)
low temperature
thermal desorp-
tion treatment.
Thermally treat
3,000 tons of
soil on-site up
to 700°F.
Four Seasons
Soil 3,000 tons
(approximately
3,000 cy)
Petroleum
hydrocarbons
Polynuclear
Aromatics, BTEX
(Benzene, Toluene,
Ethylbenzene, Xylene
200 ppm TPH was
target. Initial TPH
was 70,000 ppm -
(high) 15,000 -
20,000 ppm
(average).
16 hours/day
12 to 15 tons/hr
Operating
temperature up to
700° F
Excavation
screening
Removed
material
greater than 2
inches. Rock
washing
station for
particles
greater than 2
inches. Steam
cleaned large
rocks.
Treated soil
was backfiIled
back into the
excavated areas
on-site. Soil
that did not
meet the
targets was re-
treated.
Wastewater was
treated on-site
through carbon
filters.
Total cost
approximately
$250,000.
# Newly added or completed projects
2-32
-------
Chapter 3
Actions Under Other Federal Programs
-------
THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
-------
ACTIONS UNDER OTHER FEDERAL PROGRAMS
This chapter contains available information on projects conducted
under other federal programs that are not part of the Superfiind
program (non-Superfund sites). Many of these projects take place at
DoD and DOE facilities. Many of the DoD projects are funded by the
Defense Environmental Restoration Program (DERP), which in-
cludes the installation restoration program (IRP) and the formerly
used defense sites (FUDS) program in DoD. These sites were
identified through various sources of information, including discus-
sions with DoD and DOE personnel. However, this list of sites should
not be considered comprehensive.
FIGURE 3-1
SAMPLE OF PROJECTS UNDER OTHER FEDERAL PROGRAMS:
STATUS OF INNOVATIVE TREATMENT TECHNOLOGIES AS OF JUNE 1993*
Technology
Predesign/
In Design
Design Complete/Being
Installed/ Operational
Project Completed
Total
Soil Vapor Extraction
4
4
1
9
Thermal Desorption
0
0
0
0
Ex Situ Bioremediation
1
1
3
5
In Situ Bioremediation'
2
5
2
9
Soil Washing
1
0
1
2
In Situ Flushing
0
0
0
0
Dechlorination
0
1
0
1
Solvent Extraction
0
0
0
0
In Situ Vitrification
0
0
0
0
Other Innovative Treatment
1
1
0
2
Chemical Treatment
0
0
0
0
TOTAL
9 (32%)
12 (33%)
7 (58%)
28
• Data derived from a survey of EPA Superfund Removal Branch Chiefs and On-Scene Coordinators for each Region. ' Also Includes in situ groundwater treatment
This chapter contains information on the application of innovative
technologies at 28 non-Superfund sites. Figure 3-1 lists each type of
innovative treatment technology and the number of times it has been
selected as a remedy at a non-Superfund site. Figure 3-2 indicates the
status of innovative technologies being applied at non-Superfiind
sites. Table 3-1 provides detailed information on each application.
Tables 3-2 and 3-3 resent summaries of each application by status and
EPA Region. Table 3-4 lists details on completed applications.
3-1
-------
THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
3-2
-------
TABLE 3-1
OTHER FEDERAL PROGRAMS: SITE-SPECIFIC INFORMATION BY INNOVATIVE TREATMENT TECHNOLOGY
Table 3-1 is the principal part of this chapter. It contains the most detailed, site-specific information for removal sites for which an
innovative treatment technology has been selected. The columns of Table 3-1 present the following information:
Region
This column indicates the EPA Region in which the site is located.
Site Name, State
This column identifies the site and the operable unit for which an innovative treatment technology was selected.
An asterisk (*) in this column indicates that a treatability study has been completed for this technology at the particular site.
Specific Technology
The second column describes the specific technology selected within a general category of innovative treatment. For example,
within the general category of bioremediation, the specific technologies of land treatment or slurry-phase bioremediation may be
chosen.
Site Description
This column provides information on the industrial source of the contamination at the site and allows analysis of the selection of
innovative technologies by site type. For example, by using the information in this column, one may determine the most frequently
selected innovative technology for wood preserving sites.
Media (quantity)
This column provides information on the media and quantity of material to be treated. If a treatment is used in situ, an effort has
been made to include the maximum depth of the treatment to provide the reader with another important parameter regarding the
application.
3-3
Ta
3
-------
TABLE 3-1 (Continued)
Key Contaminants Treated
The major contaminants or contaminant groups targeted by the treatment technology are shown in this column. There may be other
contaminants as well that will be treated. Other contaminants that may be present, but that are not being addressed by the listed
technology, are not included.
Status
This column gives the status of the application of the innovative treatment technology. Predesign indicates that the ROD has been
signed but design has not begun. During predesign, EPA may be negotiating with the potentially responsible parties, procuring the
services of a design firm, or collecting information (such as conducting a treatability study) needed in the design stage. If a project is
in design, the engineering documents needed to contract for and build the remedy are being prepared. If a remedy is being installed,
the lead agency has signed a contract for the construction work needed to set up die remedy. The remedy is operational if it is
complete and it is now being operated as a treatment system; the remedy is completed if the goals of the ROD or decision document
for that treatment technology have been met and treatment has ceased.
One purpose of this column is to identify opportunities for vendors to become involved in the next phase of the projects. Whenever
possible, the season and year that the current phase will end is given. This information is identified as the "completion planned"
date.
Lead Agency, Treatment Contractor
Hie "lead" indicates whether federal dollars are to be used to implement the remedy (Fund lead) or the potentially responsible
parties will conduct the remedy with EPA/State oversight (PRP lead). If a remedy is Fund lead, EPA may manage the design/
construction through its contractors, the state may manage the project with Superfund dollars, or the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
(USACE) may act for EPA to manage the design or construction. Whichever agency or organization is responsible for managing the
remedy, the contractor responsible for the actual installation and operation of the innovative technology also is identified, if the lead
agency has selected a contractor.
Contacts/Phone
This final column gives the names and telephone numbers of useful contacts for the site or technology. The first name listed is
usually the project manager or point of contact responsible for the site. If a remedy is being managed by the state, the name and
phone number of the state project manager also is provided. Information on any other useM contacts is provided.
3-4
-------
Table 3-1
Other Federal Programs: Site-Specific Information By Innovative Treatment Technology
June 1993
Bioremediation (Ex situ)
Region
Site Name, State,
(ROD Date)
Specific
Technology
Site Description
Media (Quantity)
Key Contaminants
Treated
Status#
Lead Agency
and Treatment
Contractor (if
available)
Contacts/Phone
i
Matagorda Island AF
Range, TX
Solid phase
Federal Facility
Soil <500)
VOCs (BTEX), PAHs
-------
Table 3-1
Other Federal Programs: Site-Specific Information By Innovative Treatment Technology
June 1993
Bioremediation (In situ)
Region
Site Name, State,
(R00 Date)
Specific
Technology
Site Description
Hedia (Quantity)
Key Contaminants
Treated
Status#
Lead Agency
and Treatment
Contractor (if
available)
Contacts/Phone
i
Savannah River DOE, M
Area Settling Basin,
SC
See also Soil Vapor
Extraction, Other
Technologies
In situ ground
water
Leaking solvent
line
Groundwater
VOCs (TCE, PCE),
PAHs (DNAPLs)
Operational;
Operation
began in 1990
DOE Lead/DOE
funding;
Uestinghouse
Savannah River
Company
Nate Ellis
(DOE) '
(803)-952-4846
Brian Loony
(USRC)
(803)-752-5181
6
Hoi Toman AFB, Main POL
Area, NH
See also Soil Vapor
Extraction, Other
Technologies
In situ ground
Mater injecting
air and
nutrients
Former above
ground fuel
storage tank area
(JP-4 and AV Gas
spi11)
Groundwater
VOCs (Benzene),
PAHs (Petroleum
Hydrocarbons)
In design;
Design
completion
planned Fall
1993;
Construction
scheduled to
start Fall
1993
USACE/AIR Force
IRP Program
Ron Stirling
(USACE)
402-221-7664
6
Kelly AFB, Site 1100*,
TX
See also Soil Vapor
Extraction
In situ soil
Bioventing
Federal Facility
(hazardous waste
facility)
Soil (37,000 cy)
VOCs (JP-4)
Operational;
Completion
planned 1994
Army
(USACE)/Air
Force Funded;
IT Corporation
Joe Laird
(USACE, Omaha)
402-221-7772
8
Ft. Carson*, CO
In situ soil
Bioventing
UST Remediation
Soil (quantity
unknown)
VOCs (JP-4)
Being
installed;
Installation
completion
planned Simmer
1993
Army
(USACE)/DoD
Financed - IRP;
Woodward Clyde
Hike
Steffensmeier
(USACE)
402-342-7163
9
Aua Fuel Farm, Aua
Village, American
Samoa,
Bioremediation
(In Situ)
Fuel Farm
Soil (quantity
unknown)
PAHs (Diesel
fuel)
Operational
Army
(USACE)/DoD
Financed - FUDS
Program
Helene Takemoto
(USACE, pac
div)
808-438-6931
9
Davis Monthan AFB, AZ
In situ soil
Federal Facility
Soil (440 cy)
PAHs (Petroleun
hydrocarbons)
Completed;
Operational
from 7/91 to
3/92
USACE/Air Force
Hike
Steffansmeyer
(USACE, Omaha)
402-221-7163
3-6
-------
i aoie o-1
Other Federal Programs: Site-Specific Information By Innovative Treatment Technology June 109>3
Bioremediation (In situ) (continued)
Region
Site Name, State,
(ROD Date)
Specific
Technology
Site Description
Media (Quantity)
Key Contaminants
Treated
Status#
Lead Agency
and Treatment
Contractor (if
avallable)
Contacts/Phone
9
Davis Monthan AF8,
Site 35, AZ
See also Soil Vapor
Extraction
In situ soil
Bioventing
JP-4 Pump House
Soil (63,000 cy)
VOCs (JP-4), PAHs
In design;
Design
completion
planned Fall
1993
USACE/ Air
Force Funded
Hike
Steffanmeyer
(USACE, Omaha)
402-221-7163
9
Seal Beach Navy
Weapons Station, CA
See also Soil Vapor
Extraction
Anaerobic
Federal Facility
Naval weapons
station
Soil (1,700 cy)
VOCs (BTEX), PAHs
(Petroleum
hydrocarbons)
Operational;
Operations
started in
1989
Havy/DoO
Financed - IRP
Program; Jacobs
Engineering
Jeff Kl'dwell
(Navy)
619-532-2058
Steve McDonald
(Navy)
310-594-7655
Naval Communication
Station, Scotland,
In situ soil
Diesel fuel
storage tanks and
piping
Soil (quantity
unknown)
SVOCs (No.2
Diesel)
Completed;
Fall 1985
Nave Civil
Engineering
Lab/DoD
Federal;
Polybac
Deh Bin Chan
805-982-4191
3-7
-------
Table 3-1
Other Federal Programs: Site-Specific Information By Innovative Treatment Technology
June 1993
Dechlorination
Region
Site Name, State,
(ROD Date)
Specific
Technology
Site Description
Media (Quantity)
Key Contaminants
Treated
Status#
Lead Agency
and Treatment
Contractor (if
aval Iable)
Contacts/Phone
9
U. S. Public Works
Center, Guam
Dechlorination
Federal Facility
Soil (5,500 cy)
PCBs
Operational;
Completion
planned
Summer 1994
Kavy; IT Corp
D.B. Chan
805-982-4191
3-8
-------
i aoie j- i
Other Federal Programs: Site-Specific Information By Innovative Treatment Technology
June 19&
Soil Vapor Extraction
Region
Site Name, State,
(ROD Date)
Specific
Technology
Site Description
Media (Quantity)
Key Contaminants
Treated
Status#
Lead Agency
and Treatment
Contractor (if
avallable)
Contacts/Phone
3
Langley AFB, IRP Site
28, VA
Soil vapor
extraction with
air flushing
Federal Facility
Soil (quantity
unknown)
VOCs (Gasoline)
Being
installed;
Installation
completion
planned Summer
1994
USACE/Air Force
Funded
Tom Zink
(USACE, Omaha)
402-342-6051
Dan Musell
(Langley)
804-764-3987
4
Savannah River DOE, M
Area Settling Basin,
SC
See also
Bioremediation (In
Situ), Other
Technologies
Soil vapor
extraction with
air flushing
with ground
water sparging
Leaking solvent
line
Soil (450,000
lb). Groundwater
VOCs (TCE, PCE)
Operational;
Operation of
the SVE system
began in 1990
DOE Lead/DOE
Funding;
Westinghouse
Savannah River
Company
Nate Ellis
(DOE)
803-952-4846
Brian Looney
(WSRC)
803-725-5181
6
Hoi Ionian AFB, BX
Service station, NM
Soil vapor
extraction may
supplement with
air injection
Service Station
Soil (quantity
unknown)
VOCs (Benzene),
PAHs (Petroleum
Hydrocarbons)
In design;
Design
completion
planned Winter
1993;
Currently
conducting
pilot test.
USACE/Air Force
IRP Program;
Geraghty &
Miller - Prime,
Ualk Haydel &
Associates -
Sub
Ron Stirling
(USACE)
402-221-7664
6
Holloman AFB, Hain POL
Area, NM
See also
Bioremediation (In
Situ), Other
Technologies
Soil vapor
extraction with
air flushing
Former above
ground fuel
storage tank area
(JP-4 and AV Qas
spilt)
Soil (quantity
unknown)
VOCs (Benzene),
PAHs (Petroleum
Hydrocarbons)
In design;
Design
completion
planned Fall
1993;
Construction
scheduled to
start Fall
1993
USACE/Air Force
IRP Program
Ron Stirling
(USACE)
402-221-7664
3-9
-------
Table 3-1
Other Federal Programs: Site-Specific Information By Innovative Treatment Technology June 1991
Soil Vapor Extraction (continued}
Region
Site Heme, State,
(ROD Date)
Specific
Technology
Site Description
Media (Quantity)
Key Contaminants
Treated
Status#
Lead Agency
and Treatment
Contractor (if
available)
Contacts/Phone
6
Kelly AFB, Site 1100*,
TX
See also
Bioremediation (In
Situ)
Soil vapor
extraction
Federal Facility
(hazardous waste
facility)
Soil (37,000 cy)
VOCs (JP-4)
Operational;
Vacuum
extraction
done before
with
bioventing,
information
the same.
Army
(USACE)/Air
Force Funded
Joe Laird
(USACE, Omaha)
402-221-7772
9
Davis Monthan AFB,
Site 35, AZ
See also
Bioremediation (In
Situ)
Soil vapor
extraction with
bioventing
JP-4 Pump House
Soil (63,000 cy)
VOCs (JP-4,
Benzene)
In designj
Design
completion
planned Fall
1993
USACE/Air Force
Funded;
Montgomery
Watson - Design
Contractor
Hike
Steffansmeier
(USACE, Omaha)
402-221-7163
9
Luke AFB, AZ
Soil vapor
extraction with
air flushing and
thermal
oxidation of off
gases
Air Force fire
training pits
Soil (35,000 cy)
VOCs (2-hexanone,
2-butanone,
4-methyl
2-pentanone,
BTEX)
Completed;
Operational
from 11/91 to
5/92, Mill
conduct
long-term
monitoring
afterward
USAGE
Lead/State
Oversight;
Envi rocon
Jerome
Stolinsky
(USACE)
402-221-7170
Dan HcCafferty
(Envirocon)
406-123-1150
9
HcClellan AFB, CA
Soil vapor
extraction
Former fuel and
solvent disposal
site
Soil (12,000 cy)
VOCs (TCE, DCE,
Vinyl chloride,
Toluene,
Chlorobenzene)
Being
installed;
Installation
completion
planned Fall
1993;
Pilot-scale
test to be
complete in
Fall 1993
Air Force; CH2M
Hill
Steve Hodge
(HcClellan AFB)
916-643-0830
Jerry Styles
(HcClellan AFB)
916-643-0533
Joseph Danko
(CH2H Hill)
503-752-4271
9
Seal Beach Navy
Weapons Station, CA
See also
Bioremediation (In
Situ)
Soil vapor
extraction with
combustion of
air emissions
Federal Facility
Naval weapons
station
Soil (quantity
unknown)
VOCs (BTEX)
In design;
Operation to
start in 1994
Navy/DoO
Financed - IRP
Program; Jacobs
Engineering
Jeff Kidwell
(Navy)
619-532-2058
Steve McDonald
(Navy)
310-594-7655
3-10
-------
Table 3-1
Other Federal Programs: Site-Specific Information By Innovative Treatment Technology
June 1993
Soil Washing
Region
Site Name, State,
(R00 Date)
Specific
Technology
Site Description
Media (Quantity)
Key Contaminants
Treated
Status#
Lead Agency
and Treatment
Contractor (if
available)
Contacts/Phone
5
Saginaw Bay Confined
Disposal Facility, MI
Soil Washing
Confined disposal
island
Sediments (150
cy>
PCBs
Completed;
Summer 1992
COE
lead/Federal
Oversite;
Bergmann, USA
Jim Galloway
(USACE)
313-226-6760
Rick Traver
(Bergmann)
202-684-6844
5
Twin Cities Array
Ammunition Plant, MN
Soil Washing
Hum t ions
manufacturing/
storage
Soil (quantity
unknown)
Metals (Lead,
Mercury)
Predesign; PD
Completion
planned Fall
1993
Federal
Facility/State
oversight;
Wenck
Associates,
Inc.
Peter Rissel
(US Army Env.
Center)
Martin McCleery
(Twin Cities
AAP)
3-11
-------
Table 3-1
Other Federal Programs: Site-Specific Information By Innovative Treatment Technology
June 1993
Other
Region
Site Name, State,
(ROO Date)
Specific
Technology
Site Description
Kedia (Quantity)
Key Contaminants
Treated
Status#
Lead Agency
and Treatment
Contractor (if
available)
Contacts/Phone
4
Savannah River DOE, H
Area Settling Basin,
SC
See also
Bioremediation (In
Situ), Soil Vapor
Extraction
air sparging
Leaking solvent
line
Groundwater
VOCs (TCE, PCE)
Operational;
Operational
since 1990
DOE lead/DOE
funding;
Westinghouse
Savannah River
Company
Nate Ellis
(DOE)
803-952-4846
Brian Looney
(USRC)
803-725-5181
6
Hoi Ionian AFB, Main POL
Area, NM
See also
Bioremediation (In
Situ), Soil Vapor
Extraction
Air Sparging
Former above
ground fuel
storage tank area
(JP-4 and AV Gas
spi11)
Groundwater
VOCs (Benzene),
PAHs (Petroleum
Hydrocarbons)
In design;
Design
completion
planned Fall
1993;
Construction
scheduled to
start Fall
1993
USACE/Air Force
IRP Program
Ron Stirling
(USACE)
402-221-7664
3-12
-------
TABLE 3-2
OTHER FEDERAL PROGRAMS: INNOVATIVE TREATMENT TECHNOLOGIES
BY EPA REGION
Table 3-2 summarizes the innovative treatment technologies used at sites under other federal programs in each EPA region.
3-13
Table.
*32
-------
TABLE 3-2. OTHER FEDERAL PROGRAMS:
BY EPA
TECHNOLOGY STATE
REGION 3
Soil Vapor Extraction Langley AFB, IRP Site 28 VA
REGION 4
Bioremediation (In situ) Savannah River DOE, M Area Basin SC
Soil Vapor Extraction Savannah River DOE, M Area Basin SC
Air Sparging Savannah River DOE, M Area Basin SC
REGIONS
Soil Washing Saginaw Bay Confined Disposal Facility MI
Soil Washing Twin Cities Army Ammunition Plant MN
REGION 6
Bioremediation (In situ) Holloman AFB, Main POL Area NM
Soil Vapor Extraction Holloman AFB, BX Service Station NM
Soil Vapor Extraction Holloman AFB, Main POL Area NM
Air Sparging Holloman AFB, Main POL Area NM
Bioremediation (Ex situ) Matagorda Island AF Range TX
Bioremediation (In situ) Kelly AFB, Site 1100 TX
SoU Vapor Extraction Kelly AFB, Site 1100 TX
REC?IQN8
Bioremediation (In situ) Ft, Carson CO
tOVAUVE TREATMENT TECHNOLOGIES June 1993
HON
TECHNOLOGY SITE NAME STATE
REQTQN g fcQntinyqfl)
Bioremediation (Ex situ) Former Glasgow AFB MT
REQIQN9
Bioremediation (In situ) Aua Fuel Farm, Aua Village, American
Samoa AZ
Bioremediation (In situ) Davis Monthan AFB AZ
Bioremediation (In situ) Davis Monthan AFB, Site 35 AZ
Soil Vapor Extraction Davis Monthan AFB, Site 35 AZ
Soil Vapor Extraction Luke AFB AZ
Bioremediation (Ex situ) Ft. Ord Marina, Fritzche AAF F CA
Bioremediation (Ex situ) Marine Corps., Mountain Warfare CA
Bioremediation (In situ) Seal Beach Navy Weapons Station CA
Soil Vapor Extraction McClellan AFB CA
SoU Vapor Extraction Seal Beach Navy Weapons Station CA
Dechlorination U. S. Public Works Center, Guam GU
REGION 10
Bioremediation (Ex situ) Ft. Wainwright AK
OTHER
Bioremediation (In situ) Naval Communication Station Scotland
3-14
-------
TABLE 3-3
OTHER FEDERAL PROGRAMS: PROJECT STATUS BY
INNOVATIVE TREATMENT TECHNOLOGY
Table 3-3 lists the applications of innovative treatment technologies at other federal program sites by technology and summarizes
the status of the specific application. The symbols used in this table are:
PD -
In predesign: A site may be considered to be in predesign if EPA is negotiating the consent decree for the
design with the responsible party, the lead agency is preparing the predesign report, the lead agency is
contracting for the design firm, or the lead agency is conducting a treatability study or field investigation
before beginning actual design work.
D
In design: A site is considered to be in design after the design contractor has begun work.
D/I -
Design completed but not installed: This symbol is used if the design work had been completed but
installation work has not yet begun at the time of publication of this report.
I
Being installed: An innovative treatment technology is "being installed" from the time the construction
contract has been awarded until the time the treatment system has begun operation. For some technolo-
gies, this is a relatively short phase of the project, because such projects are assembled quickly on site. For
other technologies, the period of installation lasts several construction seasons.
0
Operational: A treatment technology is operational once it has been constructed and has been proven to
be functional. The length of time required to complete the operation phase depends on such factors as the
nature of the technology, the quantity of material to be treated, and the concentrations of the contaminants
at the start of treatment
C
Completed: A treatment technology project is considered to be completed when the operation of the
treatment technology ceases. Other site activities still may be planned or underway.
3-15
-------
TABLE 3-3. OTHER FEDERAL PROGRAMS: PROJECT STATUS BY INNOVATIVE TOEATMENT TECHNOLOGY
REGION
BIOREMEDIAHON (EX STUJ)
STATUS
REGION
SOIL VAPOR EXTRACTION
STATUS
6
Holloman AFB, Main POL Area, NM
D
8
Former Glasgow AFB, MT
D
6
Holloman AFB, BX Service Station, NM
D
10
Ft, Wainwright, AK
I
9
Seal Beach Navy Weapons Station, CA
D
6
Matagorda Island AF Range, TX
C
9
Davis Monthan AFB, Site 35, AZ
D
9
Ft. Ord Marina, Fritzche AAF Fire Drill Area, CA
c
3
Langley AFB, IRP Site 28, VA
I "
9
Marine Corps., Mountain Warfare Center, Bridgeport, CA
c
9
McClellan AFB, CA
I
4
Savannah River DOE, M Area Settling Basin, SC
O
6
Kelly AFB, Site 1100, TX
O
-
9
Luke AFB, AZ
c
REGION BIOREMEDIAHON (IN SITU)
STATUS
6
Holloman AFB, Main POL Area, NM
D
9
Davis Monthan AFB, Site 35, AZ
D
REGION SOIL WASHING
STATUS
8
Ft. Carson, CO
I
4
Savannah River DOE, M Area Settling Basin, SC
0
5
Twin Cities Army Ammunition Plant, MN
PD
6
Kelly AFB, Site 1100, TX
0
5
Saginaw Bay Confined Disposal Facility, MI
C
9
Seal Beach Navy Weapons Station, CA
0
9
Ana Fuel Farm, Aua Village, American Samoa
0
9
Davis Monthan AFB, AZ
c
Naval Communication Station, Scotland
c
REGION OTHER
STATUS
6
Holloman AFB, Main POL Area, NM
D
4
Savannah River DOE, M Area Settling Basin, SC
O
REGION DECHLORINATION
STATUS
9
U. S. Public Works Center, Guam., GU
0
3-16
-------
TABLE 3-4
OTHER FEDERAL PROGRAMS: PERFORMANCE DATA ON COMPLETED PROJECTS
Table 3-4 provides summary information oil the performance and operating parameters for applications of innovative treatment tech-
nologies that have been completed at non-Superftind sites. It is intended to supplement, not replace the information included in tables
3-1,3-2, and 3-3.
3-17
-------
TABLE 3-4
OTHER FEDERAL PROGRAMS: PERFORMANCE DATA ON COMPLETED PROJECTS
Juno 19£
Region
Site Name, State, Dates
of Operation
Technology/
Vendor
Media Treated
(Quantity)
Key Contaminants
Treated
Operating
Parameters
Materials
Handling
Required
Residuals
Hamgasent
Cocrroen t s
5
Saginaw Bay Confined
Disposal Facility, HI
October 1991 to June 4,
1992 (Army)
Soil washing;
Water with
flocculant and
surfactant as
an additive
Bermann USA
Stafford
Springs, CT
Sediment (150
cy>
PCBs
30 cy of sediment
treated per day
Dredging
Screening
Size Reduction
Residuals were
left at the
facility
Wastewater
discharged to
confined
disposal
facility
Forced cold-weather
shut down is a
limitation
6 #
Matagorda Island Af
Range, TX
10/92 to 2/28/93
Ex situ
biereadiation;
solid phase
All constructed
on abandoned
runway.
Bacteria added
and
mechanically
mixed.
Four USTs found
contamination
under one UST.
CCC, Inc.
San Antonio, TX
Soil <500 cy)
TPH, PAHs
benzene-toluene-
ethylbenzene-xylene
(BTEX)
TPH - 3,400 ppm
BTEX - 41.3 ppm
Criteria:
Texas water
commission standards
100 ppm for TPH
30 ppm for combined
BTEX
Batch process
Retention times 3
months
9 inch layers
treated.
Ambient
temperature
bacterial added to
waste
Excavated
approximately
40 by 60 ft
area.
Constructed on
poly barrier
and clean sand
base. Did
some mixing.
Backfilled the
soil into the
excavation
Island is now a
wildlife refuge, has
an endangered species.
9
Ft. Ord Marina, Fritzche
AAF Fire Drill Area, CA
Winter 1991
(Army)
Land farming
Soil (4,000 cy)
TGE, MEK, TPH, BTEX
Initial
concentration >
1,000 ppm
End concentration
< 200 ppm
None
None
Gail Youngblood
408-242-8017
9
Marine Corps.
Mountain Warfare Center
Bridgeport, CA
8/89 to 11/89
(Navy)
Bioremediation
(ex situ); heap
pile bioreactor
Soil (7,000 cy)
PAHs (petroleum
hydrocarbons,
diesel), Metals
(Lead)
After 2 months of
operation the TPH
levels were 120 ppm
Excavation
Temperature, pressure
and moisture content
are monitored
Bill Major (DoD)
805-982-1808
# Newly added or completed projects
3-18
-------
I HDLC J**f
OTHER FEDERAL PROGRAMS: PERFORMANCE DATA ON COMPLETED PROJECTS (continued) June 195
Region
Site Name, State, Dates
of Operation
Technology/
Vendor
Media Treated
(Quantity)
Key Contaminants
Treated
Operating
Parameters
Materials
Handling
Requi red
Residuals
Management
Comments
9 #
Luke AFB, AZ
11/92 to 5/9
Soil vapor
extraction with
air flushing
and thermal
oxidation of
off-gases
Jacobs
Engineering
Soil (35,000 cy)
VOCs
(2-hexanone, 2-
butanone, 4-methyl 2
pentanone, BTEX)
Removed
approximately 11,000
lbs of vapors and
4,000 lbs of
condensate
In situ down to
100 feet
None
Vaports were
thermally
oxidized
Total petroleum
hydrocarbons were
present but were too
heavy to volatilize.
Mould recommend
containing SVE with in
situ bioremediation to
treat contaminants
that could not be
extracted with the
SVE.
Naval Communication
Station, Scotland
February to October 1985
(Navy)
Bioremediation
In situ soil,
in situ ground
water
Soil,
Groundwater
Soil quantity
approximately
800 m2 in area,
depth unknown
TPH (No. 2 diesel
fuel)
Microorganisms
function best
between 20°C and
35 °C.
Run-off water
collected in a
trench
None
The contaminated area
had considerable
slope, and the
contaminated soil was
a thin layer over a
relatively impermeable
rock substrate.
Newly added or completed projects
3-19
-------
THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
?-?.n
-------
Appendix A
Summary of Status Report Updates, Changes,
and Deletions
-------
THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
-------
Each edition of this report has added new information on the applications of innovative technologies at Superfund sites and has updated the status of
existing innovative projects. The information added from ROD's from previous fiscal years that was deleted, or changed in each edition (from the
first edition of the report published in January 1991 through this 5th edition) is described below to allow tracking of specific projects from edition to
edition.
Additions, Changes, and Deletions from the 1st edition report (January 1991) to the 2nd edition report (September 1991).
Region
Site Name, State (ROD Bate)
Technology (Listed
in 1st Edition)
2nd Edition
Comments
Contacts/Phone
Added
Deleted
Changed to
3
Leetown Pesticides, WV (03/31/86)
Bioremediation
Yes
No further action. Risk re-
evaluated and was determined that
risk was not sufficient for remcidal
action.
Andy Palestini
215-597-1286
Philip Rotstein
215-597-9023
3
Harvey-Knott Drum, DE (09/30/85)
In Situ Soil Flushing
Yes
During remedial design, sampling
indicated VOCs were no longer
present in the soils. Heavy metals
remained at the surface. An ESD
was issued on 12/92. Remedy will
consist of capping the site.
Kate Lose
215-597-0910
2
SMS Instruments (Deer Park), NY
(09/29/89)
Thermal Desorption
Yes (changed
to soil vapor
extraction in
3rd edition)
Misinterpretation of ROD during
ROD analysis
Miko Fayon
212-264-4706
1
Re-Solve, MA (09/24/87)
Chemical Treatment
Dechlorination
Reclassified technology
Lorenzo Thantu
617-223-5500
2
GE Wiring Services, PR (09/30/88)
Chemical Extraction
Soil Washing
Reclassified technology
Caroline Kwan
212-264-0151
6
Sol Lynn/Industrial Transformers,
TX (03/25/88)
Chemical Treatment
Dechlorination
Reclassified technology
John Meyer
214-655-6735
10
Northwest Transformer, WA
(09/15/89)
In Situ Vitrification
Yes
Technology dropped because
commercial availability was
delayed
Christine Psyk
206-553-6519
Note: The 2nd edition report also added information on 45 innovative treatment technologies selected for remedial actions in FY 1990 RODs and
18 innovative treatment technologies used in removal actions.
A-l
-------
Additions, Changes, and Deletions from the 2nd edition report (September 1991) to the 3rd edition report (April 1992).
Region
Site Name, State (ROD Date)
Technology (Luted
in 2nd Edition)
3rd Edition
Comments
Contacts/Phone
Added
Deleted
Changed to
2
Marathon Battery, NY (09/30/88)
Thermal Desoiption
Yes
During design soil gas
concentration at hot spots was
below NY state standards. GW
monitoring will continue.
Pam Tames
212-264-1036
2
Goose Farm, NJ (09/27/85)
In Situ Soil Flushing
Yes
Incorrectly classified. Actually
conducting pump and treat with
treated water being reinjected
Laura Lombardo
212-264-6989
2
GE Wiring Services, PR (09/30/88)
Soil Washing
Thermal
Desoiption
Possible pre-wash of debris with
surfactants
Caroline Kwan
212-264-0151
4
Coleman-Evans Wood Preserving,
FL (09/26/90)
Soil Washing
Yes
Problems due to the presence of
furans. Incineration likely
Tony Best
404-347-2643
5
Sangamo/Crab Orchard National
Wildlife Refuge, IL (08/01/90)
In Situ Vitrification
Yes
Incineration
ROD specified the remedy as in
situ vitrification or incineration.
Incineration was chosen
Nan Gowda
312-353-9236
5
Anderson Development, Ml
(09/28/90)
In Situ Vitrification
Thermal
Desorption
Because of concern by the
community the remedy was
changed. ROD amendment signed
9/30/91, and ESD was signed
10/2/92
Jim Hahnenberg
312-353-4213
5
U.S. Aviex, MI (09/07/88)
In Situ Flushing
Yes
Cleanup levels reached by natural
attenuation
Robert Whippo
312-886-4759
6
Atchison/Santa Fe/Clovis, NM
(09/23/88)
Bioremediation
(ex situ)
Yes
Ky Nichols
214-655-6783
6
Crystal Chemical, TX (09/27/90)
In Situ Vitrification
Yes
Remedy reconsidered after delay in
commercial availability of
technology. Vitrification
considered for hot spots only.
Revised remedy will consist of
capping and off-site disposal/con-
solidation of soils.
Lisa Price
214-655-6735
Note: The 3rd edition report also added information on 70 innovative treatment technologies selected for remedial actions in FY 1991 RODs.
A-2
-------
Region
Site Name* State (ROD Date)
Technology (Listed
in 2nd Edition)
3rd Edition
Comments
ConUcts/Pbone
Added
Deleted
Changed to
9
Solvent Service, CA (09/27/90)
Bioremediation
(in situ)
Yes
ROD was misinterpreted during
ROD analysis
Kevin Graves
510-286-0435
Steve Morse (CA)
570-286-0304
9
Poly Carb, NV (Removal)
Bioremediation
(ex situ)
Bioremediation
(in situ)
Reclassified technology
Bob Mandel
415-744-2290
A-3
-------
Additions, Changes, and Deletions from the 3rd edition report (April 1992) to the 4th edition report (October 1992).
Region
Site Name, Slate (ROD Date)
Technology (Listed
in 3rd Edition)
4th Edition
Comments
Contacts/Phone
Added
Deleted
Changed to
2
Lipari Landfill Marsh Sediment, NJ
(07/11/88)
None
Thermal
Desorption
Missed during original ROD
analysis
Tom Graff
816426-2296
2
GE Wiring Services PR (09/30/88)
Thermal Desorption
Soil Washing
Caroline Kwan
212-264-0151
5
University of Minnesota, MN
(06/11/90)
Thermal Desorption
Yes
Incineration
in 5th edition
Issued an ESD in August 1991 to
change remedy to Thermal
Desorption qt Incineration.
Incineration was chosen because it
was less expensive
Darrel Owens
312-886-7089
6
Sol Lynn/Industrial Dechlorination
Transformers, TX (03/25/88)
Dechlorination
Yes
Discontinued due to
implementation difficulties
John Meyer
214-655-6735
6
Koppers/Texarkana, TX
(09/23/88)
Soil Washing
In Situ
Flushing
Remedy added by ROD
amendment
Ursula Lennox
214-655-6735
9
Poly Carb, NV (Removal)
Bioremediation
(in situ)
Bioremediation
(ex situ)
Reclassified technology
Bob Mandel
415-744-2290
9
Teledyne Semiconductors, CA
(03/22/91)
Soil Vapor
Extraction
Yes
Mistakenly deleted from report
Sean Hogan
415-744-2233
10
Gould Battery (03/31/88)
Soil Washing
Soil Washing
Missed during original ROD
analysis
Chip Humphries
503-326-2678
Note: The 4th edition report also added information on 10 innovative treatment technologies selected for remedial action in FY 1992 RODs, and 21
innovative treatment technologies at non-Superfund sites.
A-4
-------
Additions, Changes, and Deletions from the 4th edition report (October 1992) to the 5th edition report (September 1993).
ii: w:. i ~Wi
s.fi|;::I^i
Region
technology Listed
Added
Deleted
Changed to
Comments
Ctmtacts/Phone
1
Re-Solve, MA (09/24/87)
Dechlorination
Yes
Pilot study showed that
dechlorination increased the
volume and that the waste still
needed to be incinerated. An ESD
to incinerate residuals off-site is in
peer review.
Joe Lemay
617-573-9622
1
Pinette's Salvage Yard, ME
(05/30/89)
Solvent Extraction
Yes
Will incinerate off-site
Ross Gilleland
617-573-5766
2
Naval Air Warfare Center, OU 1,
NJ (02/04/91)
In Situ Flushing
Yes
Remedy involves pump and treat
with on-site discharge. Soil is not
being targeted.
Jeff Gratz
212-264-6667
2
Naval Air Warfare Center, OU 2,
NJ (02/04/91)
In Situ Flushing
Yes
Remedy involves pump and treat
with on-site discharge. Soil is not
being targeted.
Jeff Gratz
212-264-6667
2
Naval Air Warfare Center, OU 4,
NJ (02/04/91)
In Situ Flushing
Yes
Remedy involves pump and treat
with on-site discharge. Soil is not
being targeted.
Jeff Gratz
212-264-6667
2
Caldwell Trucking, NJ (09/25/86)
Thermal Desorption
Yes
Thermal desoiption not needed
because highly contaminated soil
will be incinerated off-site instead.
Remainder will be stabilized. ESD
issued.
Ed Finnerty
212-264-3555
3
Tobylanna Army Depot, PA
(Non-Superftmd project)
Bioremediation
(in situ)
Yes
Will conduct ex situ passive
volatilization
Drew Lausch
215-597-3161
Ross Mantione
(Tobyhanna)
717-894-6494
Note: The 5th edition report also adds information on 49 innovative treatment technologies selected for remedial actions in FY 1992 RODs, and 15
innovative treatment technologies used in removal actions.
A-5
-------
Additions, Changes, and Deletions from the 4th edition report (October 1992) to the 5th edition report (September 1993). (continued)
Technology Listed
in 4th Edition
5th Edition
Region
Site Name, State (ROD Date)
Added
Meted
Changed to
Comments
Contacts/Phone
4
Smith's Farm Brooks
(09/30/91)
Dechlorination
Thermal
Desorption
Will alter chemistry to achieve
dechlorination during thermal
desorption.
Tony DcAngclo
404-347-7791
4
American Creosote Works, FL
(09/28/89)
Soil Washing
Yes
Bench-scale study of soil washing
showed that the concentrations of
carcinogenic PAHs were not
adequately reduced. Also
discovered dioxins at much higher
concentrations
Mark Fite
404-347-2643
4
American Creosote Works, FL
(09/28/89)
Bioremediation (Ex
Situ)
Yes
Bench-scale study of
bioremediation (ex situ) showed
that the concentrations of
carcinogenic PAHs were not
adequately reduced. Also
discovered dioxins at much higher
concentrations
Mark Fite
404-347-2643
4
Hoilingsworth Solderless, FL
(04/10/86)
None
Soil Vapor
Extraction
Listed as soil aeration in 3rd
edition
John Zimmerman
404-347-2643
5
Cliffs/Dow Dump, MI (09/27/89)
Bioremediation (In
Situ)
Yes
Bioremediation (in situ) was a
misinterpretation of the ROD. All
soil will be excavated and treated
by bioremediation (ex situ).
Ken Glatz
312-886-1434
6
Tenth Street Dump/Junkyard, OK
(09/27/90)
Dechlorination
Yes
Remedy has been suspended
because of implementation
difficulties and escalating cost.
Cost doubled from cost projected
in ROD. Issuing ROD amendment
to cap in place.
Mike Overbay
214-655-8512
7
Fairfield Coal & Gas, IA (09/21/90)
Bioremediation (in
situ)
Yes
Pilot study showed in situ
bioremediation was too costly. It
appears that the present pump and
treat system will be able to achieve
cleanup levels.
Bruce Morrison
913-551-7755
A-6
-------
Additions, Changes, and Deletions from the 4th edition report (October 1992) to the 5th edition report (September 1993). (continued)
Region
Site Name, State (ROD Date)
Technology Listed
in 4th Edition
5th Edition
Comments
, Contacts/Phone
Added
Deleted
Changed to
8
Sand Creek Industrial OU 5, CO
(09/28/90)
Soil Washing
Thermal
Desorption
Soil washing did not meet
performance standards and was
expensive. ROD amendment issued
early September 1993.
Etna Acheson
303-294-1971
9
Koppers Company (Oroville), CA
(04/04/90)
Bioremediation (Ex
Situ)
Yes
Misinterpretation of ROD during
ROD analysis
Fred Schlauffler
415-744-2365
9
Signetics (AMD 901) TRW OU, CA
(09/11/91)
None
Soil Vapor
Extraction
Remedy added
Joe Healy
415-744-2331
Kevin Graves
(CA)
510-286-0435
9
Teledyne Semiconductors, CA
(09/30/91)
None
Soil Vapor
Extraction
Dropped by mistake from 4th
edition
Sean Hogan
415-744-2233
10
IDEL Warm Waste Pond, ID
(12/05/91)
Acid Extraction
Yes
Treatability study of acid extraction
did not achieve good extraction
rates. Did not reduce the volume
of waste. Will excavate,
consolidate and cap.
Linda Meyer
206-553-6636
Nolan Jenson
(DOE)
208-526-0436
10
IDEL Warm Waste Pond, ID
(12/05/93)
Soil Washing
Yes
Treatability study of soil washing
did not achieve results. Did not
reduce the volume of waste. Will
excavate, consolidate and cap.
Linda Meyer
206-553-6636
Nolan Jenson
(DOE)
208-526-0436
A-7
------- |