EPA-542-R-95-Q10
December 1995
Market Opportunities for
Innovative Site Cleanup Technologies;
Middle-Atlantic States
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response
Technology Innovation Office
Washington, DC 20460
-------
NOTICE
Mention of trade names or commercial products does not constitute endorsement or recommendation
for use. . '
Additional copies of this document can be obtained from: National Technical Information Service
(OTIS), U.S. Department of Commerce, 5285 Port Royal Road, Springfield, VA 22161, (703)
487-4600. When ordering refer to document number PB96-121637.
-------
FOREWORD
The size and scope of the nation's hazardous waste problem have been well documented. In pur 1993
report Cleaning Up the Nation's Waste Sites: Markets and Technology Trends (PB93-140762), we
provided a national perspective on the overall size of markets (Federal, state, local, and private) for
hazardous waste remediation technologies. This regional market report provides a detailed and
updated view of specific market opportunities at waste sites located in the Middle-Atlantic region of
the qbuntry. It highlights opportunities for innovative hazardous waste site cleanup in Delaware, the
District of Columbia, Maryland, Pennsylvania, Virginia, and West'Virginia. The information
contained in this report covers Superfund,, Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA)
corrective action, petroleum Underground Storage Tanks (UST), Federal facility, and state cleanup
programs. . .
The purpose of the report is to provide, under one coyer, information on sites in the region that could
potentially result in market opportunities for innovative site cleanup technologies. The sites and
-programs highlighted in each state and the District of Columbia represent those that would appear to
provide the best near term opportunities for cleanup technologies (2 to 5 years). The contents of this
report come from a number of state and Federal sources and represent a compilation of the best,
accessible data we could identify. We have sought to provide the most detailed data available on the
specific sites and programs., although available information sources for some programs are limited.
The report seeks to uncover potential leads fpr site cleanup opportunities and to give sufficient contact
information to allow interested parties to follow-up on those leads.
: , ' , , ' ' ' "
We would like to thank the staff, from state waste programs who contributed their time and
information to the report. We would also like to thank EPA headquarters and regional personnel for
their contributions of data and subsequent review of the completed report.
Walter W. Kovalick, Jr., Ph.D.
Director, Technology Innovation Office
111
-------
AT
-------
CONTENTS
Section . .,; . . Page
FOREWORD ..........'.,......,........................;.._ iii
LIST OF ACRONYMS ....... ... . ... . .... .'.. . . . .... . . . . . .". . . . ... . . . xi
1.0 INTRODUCTION AND SUMMARY OF FINDINGS . . , ... .-. . .....:.,.. ~ 1-1
1.1 ' Purpose and Scope . . ... .......... . . . . . .... ,. ......... . . . . . 1-2
1.2 Remediation Programs, at the EPA Regional Level . . . . . ...... . 1-3
1.3 Remediation Programs at the State Level ......................... 1-8
1.4 Remediation Programs Managed by the Departments .-':'
. of Defense and Energy ....... . ; . . . . ..'. ... . .., . . . . . . . ...... . . . . 1-10
1.5 Summary of Findings for Each Site : . . . . . . . 1-12
1.6 Survey of Innovative Treatment Technologies . .
Typically Employed in Region 3 .... . . . . . .... .-.'. . . . . . .'. . . . ... . . 1-15
1.7 Sites Managed Under the Brownfields Initiative . . 1-16
1.8 Sources of Data Used to Develop This Report . . ... . .;. . . , ..... . ... ... 1-16
1.9 Report Organization . ... ........... . .'. .... . . . ..... . . . . . . . 1-22
2.0. DEMAND FOR REMEDIATION OF SITES IN DELAWARE 2-1
2.1 The De.law.are Hazardous Waste Management Program . ,-.'. . ,2-4
2.2 The Market at Abandoned Sites Managed Under State
Authorities ..... .... ........ '. . .' . .... ... ... 2-5
2.3 The Market at Abandoned Sites Managed-Under the Federal
Superfund Program 2-5
2,4, The Market at RCRA Corrective Action Sites ........................ 2-7
2.5 The Market at UST Sites Managed by the State ;,. . . 2-9
2.6 , The Market at Federal Facility Sites in Delaware ............ . v . .-'. .'. 2-10
2,7 Further Market Information for Delaware ... . ... . . ......... . . .... 2-10
3.0 DEMAND FOR REMEDIATION OF SITES IN THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ... 3-1
3.1 The District of Columbia Hazardous Waste Management
Program . . . . ; 1 3-1
3.2 . The Market at UST Sites Managed by the District . . . .... ........ , . . . . . 3-3
.3.3 The Market at Federal Facility Sites in the
District of Columbia 3-4
3.4 Further Market Information for the District of Columbia 3^4
4.0 ': DEMAND FOR REMEDIATION OF SITES IN MARYLAND . . 4-1
4.1 The Maryland Hazardous Waste Management Program 4-4
4.2 The Market at Abandoned Sites Managed Under State
Authorities .....;. , ...... .......... 4-4
-------
CONTENTS (continued)
Section
4;3 The Market at Abandoned Sites Managed Under the
Federal Superfund Program 4_6
4.4 The Market at RCRA Corrective Action Sites "4-8
4.5 The Market at UST Sites Managed by the State ....:....'.'......' 4^3
4.6 The Market at Federal Facility Sites in Maryland .....'.... 4.9
. 4.7 Further Market Information for Maryland . ; ......! 4-12
5.0 DEMAND FOR REMEDIATION OF SITES IN PENNSYLVANIA . 5.1
5.1 The Pennsylvania Hazardous Waste Management Program i ....... 5-4
5.2 The Market at Abandoned Sites Managed Under State .
Authorities .-. . ,. .... 5-6
5.3 The Market at Abandoned Sites Managed Under the Federal ;
Superfund Program ...... . . ' 5_10
- 5.4 The Market at RCRA Corrective Action Sites .'. 5-12
5.5 The Market at UST Sites Managed by the State ..... . . . . . . . . . ' ' . . . 5^13
5.6 The Market at Federal Facility Sites in Pennsylvania 5-14
5.7 Further Market Information for Pennsylvania 5-18
6.0 DEMAND FOR REMEDIATION OF SITES IN VIRGINIA .................. 6-1
* " "i '
6.1 The Virginia Hazardous Waste Management Program . . 6-1
6.2 The Market at Abandoned Sites Managed Under the Federal ........
Superfund Program . . . , 6_5
6.3 The Market at RCRA Corrective Action Sites ....... . 6-7
6.4 The Market at UST Sites Managed by the State . . . '. . . '. . . '.'.','.['.'. . . . . 6-8
6.5 The Market at Federal Facility Sites in Virginia .,........'-.!..,' 6-9
6.6 Further Market Information for Virginia .........].. 6-13
7.0 DEMAND FOR REMEDIATION OF SITES IN. WEST VIRGINIA 7-1
7.1 The West Virginia Hazardous Waste Management Program ............. 7-4
7.2 The Market at Abandoned Sites Managed Under the
Federal Superfund Program 7.5
7.3 The Market'at RCRA Corrective Action Sites .- i-i
7.4 The Market at UST Sites Managed by the State '.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'. ."'.' . . '. ' 7-8
7.5 The Market at Federal Facility Sites in West Virginia . 7.9
7.6 Further Market Information for West Virginia .'.'!!!!-.''' 7-10
VI
-------
CONTENTS (continued)
Appendix
A . LIST OF ALL REGION 3 DOD. INSTALLATIONS EITHER WITH TWO OR FEWER .
SITES OR ESTIMATED COSTS FOR CLEANUP OF LESS THAN OR EQUAL TO $1
. MILLION . _ . - .-.''':. '.
B EPA REGION 3 BROWNFIELDS ECONOMIC REDEVELOPMENT INITIATIVE FACT
SHEETS
C GOVERNMENT CONTRACTS OF POTENTIAL INTEREST TO VENDORS OF
INNOVATIVE REMEDIATION TECHNOLOGIES
D REFERENCES
FIGURES
'age
1-1 Sources of Data 1-19
2-1 NPL Sites in Delaware .. .\......................... .2-2
2-2 RCRA Facilities in Delaware ........: , , . . 2-3
2-3 NPL Site Size Distribution for State of Delaware :................. . .2-8
3-1 RCRA Facilities in the District of Columbia .................. .'. . . . ... . . 3-2
4-1 NPL Sites in Maryland . . . . ... . .'. . . . . . . '. ...... .... 4-2
4-2 RCRA Facilities in Maryland . .- . . . . . . , ..'... . ...... '. ..............'. 4-3
4-3 NPL Site Size Distribution for the State of Maryland ... .,-,".. 4-7
5-1 NPL Sites in Pennsylvania ..................................... . . 5-2
5-2 RCRA Facilities in Pennsylvania 1 ............ . . 5-3
5-3 NPL Site Size Distribution in Pennsylvania .................. .' . ........ 5-11
6-1 ' NPL Sites in Virginia . . . . '. ....... ; .......... ... ....... 6-2
6-2 RCRA Facilities in Virginia .. ..... . . ; . »'.... ...... ... ........ ... . . . .,...' 6-3
6-3 NPL Site Size Distribution in Virginia ......:. . .....................;. .6-7
7-1 , NPL Sites in West Virginia .......... \". ..; .i ..................... ^ 7-2
7-2 - RCRA Facilities in West Virginia . ; ................................... 7-3
7-3 NPL Site Size Distribution for the State of West Virginia N. ..."... . . . :. . . . . . . -. . . 7-7
vii-
-------
CONTENTS (continued)
TABLES
Table
1-1 Total Number of RCRA Facilities and Facilities Where a Corrective Measures Study
Has Been Imposed in Region 3 ......... 1 1-5
1-2 Total Number of RCRA Facilities and Facilities Where a RCRA Facility Investigation
Has Been Imposed in Region 3 1-6
1-3 Number of NPL Sites and Operable Units Requiring Remediation in Region 3 ....... 1-7
1-4 Number of NPL Sites in Region 3 in the Pre-Design or Design Phase With Innovative
Technology Projects . 1-8
1-5 Number of Abandoned Hazardous Waste Sites in Region 3 Presenting Potential
Opportunities. ............ 1-9
1-6 Underground Storage Tank Corrective Action Measures in Region 3
as of Third Quarter FY95 .............. . . -. . . 1-10
1-7 DoD Installations and Sites Located in Region 3 at Which Remedial Activities are
Planned ..,...,........:..... '...... 1-11
1-8 Comparative Statistics for Marketing Opportunities in the Middle-Atlantic States ..... 1-12
1-9 Innovative Treatment Technologies Used in Region 3 . . 1-17
2-1 Remedial Response'Sites Under the Delaware Hazardous Substance Control Act ...... 2-6
2-2 Number of Sites and Operable Units at Federal NPL Sites in Delaware ............ 2-7
2-3 NPL Sites hi Delaware at Which Marketing Opportunities Exist 2-13
2-4 RCRA Facilities in Delaware Currently Undergoing Corrective Action 2-15
2-5 Underground Storage Tank Corrective Action Measures in Delaware as of Third
Quarter FY95 - - . . ......:...,.... 2-9
2-6 DoD Installations and Sites in Delaware at Which Cleanup is Planned 2-11
3-1 Underground Storage Tank Corrective Action Measures in the District of Columbia as
of Third Quarter FY95 . . 3-3
3-2 DoD Installations and Sites in the District of Columbia at Which Cleanup is Planned .,..,. 3-5
4-1 Sites in Maryland Selected for Priority Cleanup .................'... 4-5
4-2 Number of Sites and Operable Units at Federal NPL Sites in Maryland ............ 4-6
4-3 NPL Sites in Maryland at Which Marketing .Opportunities Exist 4-13
4-4 Underground Storage Tank'Corrective Action Measures in Maryland as of Third
Quarter FY95 . 4-8
4-5 DoD Installations and Sites in Maryland at Which Cleanup is Planned 4-10
5-1 Sites Subject to the Pennsylvania Hazardous Waste Site Cleanup Act .....:. 5-7
5-2 Pennsylvania HSCA Remedial Response Sites at Which Remediation Activities Have
Not Yet Started .:............. 5-8
5-3 Pennsylvania Other HSCA Sites at Which Remediation Activities May Be Required ... 5-10
5-4 Number of Sites and Operable Units at Federal NPL Sites in Pennsylvania . 5-12
5-5 NPL Sites in Pennsylvania at Which Marketing Opportunities Exist . , 5-21
5-6 RCRA Facilities in Pennsylvania Currently Undergoing Corrective Action 5-37
5-7 Underground Storage Tank Corrective Action Measures in Pennsylvania as of Third
Quarter FY95 , . .-'.'. . 5-14
5-8 DoD Installations and Sites in Pennsylvania at Which Cleanup is Planned 5-15
Vlll
-------
CONTENTS (continued)
6-1 Number of Sites and Operable Units at Federal NPL Sites in Virginia .......... . . 6-6
6-2 NPL Sites in Virginia at Which Marketing Opportunities Exist . . . . .... . , .,. . ... . 6-17
6-3 RCRA Facilities Currently iri Virginia Undergoing Corrective Action . .;......;.. 6-21
6-4 Underground Storage Tank Corrective: Action Measures in Virginia as of Third 1
Quarter FY95 ............. .... . . . . ... . ...,....:.. . . . . . . . . . .... . , 6-9
6-5 DoD Installations and Sites in Virginia at Which Cleanup is Planned .. . . . . 6-10
7-1 NPL Sites in West Virginia at Which Marketing Opportunities Exist ; ....... .... 7-13
7-2 Number of'Sites and Operable Units at Federal NPL Sites in West Virginia ..'....... 7-6
7-3 RCRA Sites in West Virginia Undergoing Corrective Action ... 1 ; ............. 7-15
7-4 Underground Storage Tank Corrective Action Measures in West Virginia '
as of Third Quarter FY95 . . ...... . . . . . 7-8
7-5 DoD Installations and Sites in West Virginia at Which Cleanup is Planned!. .-. .... .... 7-10
IX
-------
-------
LIST OF ACRONYMS
AOC Area of Concern :
AST Abovegrdund Storage Tank
CERCLA Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act
CERCLIS Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Information
System ' . ,
CFR Code of Federal Regulations
CLU-IN Clean-Up Information Bulletin Board System /
CMI Corrective Measures Implementation . '
CMS Corrective Measures Study . . .
DENIX Defense Environmental Network for Information exchange
DEP Division of Environmental Protection .
DEQ Department of Environmental Quality , . :
DERA Defense Environmental Restoration Account '
DERP Defense Environmental Restoration Program
DNREC Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Control
DoD Department of Defense ,
DOE ; Department of Energy
El." Environmental Indicators ' .
EPA Environmental Protection Agency
FFID. ' . Federal Facility Identification Number , .
FTP File Transfer Protocol
PUDS Formerly Used Defense Site '
FY Fiscal Year
HRS Hazard Ranking System
HSCA Hazardous Sites Cleanup Act
LUST Leaking Underground Storage Tank .
MCL : Maximum Contaminant Level . _
MDE Maryland Department of the Environment
NASA National Aeronautics and Space Administration
NPL National Priorities List ,
O&M Operation and Maintenance *
OSWER Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response
OUST .. Office of Underground Storage Tanks . ' .
PA Preliminary Assessment
PADEP Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection
PAH . Polyaromatic Hydrocarbons
PCB Polychlorinated Biphenyls . " .
PCE Perchloroethylene - .
PNA Polynuclear Aromatics
POL Petroleum, Oil, and Lubricants
PRP Potentially Responsible Party
RA ; Remedial Action . . .
RCRA Resource Conservation,and Recovery Act
RCRIS , Resource Conservation and Recovery Information System
RD Remedial Design
RELAI Responsive Electronic Link Access Interface
XI
-------
LIST OF ACRONYMS (continued)
RFA RCRA'Facility Assessment
RH RCRA Facility Investigation !
RI/FS Remedial Investigation and Feasibility Study
RID ROD Information Database
ROD 'Record of Decision . '
RP Responsible Party
RPM "Remedial Project Manager '
SARA '= Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization Act
SI. Site Inspection
SNAP Superfund NPL Assessment Program
SVOC Semivplatile Organic Compound
SWMU Solid Waste Management Unit .
TCE , Trichloroethylene
TIO . Technology Innovation Office
TSD Treatment, Storage, and Disposal ' '
USDA U.S. Department of Agriculture :
UST Underground Storage Tank ;
UXO Unexploded Ordnance
VISITT Vendor Information System for Innovative Treatment Technologies
VOC Volatile Organic Compound ' .' ,
VRP Voluntary Remediation Program
xu
-------
1.0 INTRODUCTION AND SUMMARY OF FINDINGS ,
The purpose of this report is to provide vendors and developers of innovative treatment technologies a
resource to use in determining potential technology needs present in the Middle-Atlantic states in
order to support them in developing marketing plans for the region. Innovative treatment
technologies for remediation are defined here as those technologies for which a lack of cost and
performance data inhibit their routine consideration and use. This report was prepared under the
direction of the Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response (OSWER) Technology Innovation
Office.(TIO) of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). It provides information on
potential site clean-up marketing opportunities in EPA's Region 3, which covers Delaware, the
District of Columbia, Maryland, Pennsylvania, Virginia, and West Virginia. This report is a
companion to a 1993 survey report developed by TIO, Cleaning up the Nation's Waste Sites:
Markets and Technology Trends. That report presented a broad national survey of the potential
markets for innovative hazardous waste remediation technologies, and this report presents more
.specific descriptions to help identify potential markets in the Middle-Atlantic region. An update of
the national market study will be available in early 1996. '-"..
This section presents the purpose and scope of the report, a description of the methodology used to
collect market information, a brief discussion of the market-driving regulatory programs at the EPA
regional level, a discussion of market opportunities at the state levels, and the potential markets
available at Federal facilities. '(In Region 3, the Federal facility universe consists, for the most part,
of Department of Defense (DoD) installations, although both the U.S. Department of Agriculture
(USDA) and the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) have installations subject to
remedial action). The remainder of this section provides a summary of the findings for each state,
along with a discussion of technologies that have been employed throughout the Region and a
discussion of how jto use the document. " ,'
The main body of the report, Sections 2 through 7, provides detailed accounts of the potential markets
for innovative hazardous waste remediation technologies in each Middle-Atlantic state. This report
also contains four appendices: Appendix A contains a list of DoD installations with two or fewer
sites or estimated costs for cleanup of less than or equal to $1 million; Appendix B contains EPA-
produced fact sheets concerning the Brownfields Economic Redevelopment Initiative; Appendix C
contains- information on various government contracts of potential interest to vendors of innovative
remediation technologies; and Appendix D contains a list of references used to prepare this report.
: ' . 1-1 '"' ' . '''
-------
The main findings of this report are:
Underground storage tank (UST) sites present the greatest opportunity, in terms of
absolute number of sites (though not in complexity of remediation tasks), for
.marketers of innovative remediation technologies, followed by DoD sites, Superfund
National Priorities List (NPL) sites, and in states that maintain an abandoned
hazardous waste site program., abandoned hazardous waste sites managed by the state.
Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) facilities subject to corrective
action, at which a requirement for. a corrective measures study (CMS) or a RCRA
facility investigation (RFI) has been imposed are the smallest market in terms of
absolute number of sites. However, as time passes, the RCRA segment of the market
is likely to grow. . '"'.'
There are more than 424 RCRA treatment, storage, or disposal (TSD) facilities in
EPA Region 3 of which 22 are currently under a requirement to conduct a CMS,
indicating that a corrective action .will be conducted at the facility in the near future.
Forty-nine of the RCRA TSDs have been required to conduct an RFI. Based-on EPA
experience at sites nationwide, the majority of those facilities are also likely to
undergo some form of corrective action. They may, however, represent longer term
.opportunities. .
There are 164 sites in Region 3 that are listed on the NPL,of which 121 present
potential opportunities for marketers of innovative remediation'technologies.
Fifty-two, hazardous waste sites managed under state programs require remediation.
There are 3,119 confined release UST sites that require cleanup.
There are 84 DoD installations in Region 3. On those installations, there are 743
sites at which cleanup is planned. . '
Baltimore,' Maryland, Cape Charles and Richmond, Virginia, and Philadelphia and
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, have been designated as pilot project sites under the
Brownfields Economic Redevelopment Initiative. .
Innovative remediation technologies have been selected for use at 23 NPL sites, DoD
sites, or RCRA .sites in Region 3.
1.1 Purpose and Scope
This report provides a vendor interested in exploring remediation market possibilities in the Middle-
Atlantic region with sufficient information to determine whether there is an apparent need for the
technology the vendor sells and in which states the opportunities for marketing can be found. TIO
believes that the report will be a valuable tool for vendors, interested in determining future markets for
1-2
-------
their technologies. The report provides vendors with an overview of the regional market by
identifying individual states that offer promising opportunities and identifying individual RCRA
facilities, sites listed on the Superfund NPL, and Federal facilities in each state that are possible
marketing targets. TIO believes that these resources will provide marketers of innovative
technologies with an improved capability to initially identify opportunities and to augment their
' . ' '
marketing strategies. . -..-.' . .
The report illustrates the general state of the remediation market in Region 3 by highlighting spepific
information on individual facilities and government installations in need of remediation. The report
also provides information on the potential predisposition of EPA and the states to use innovative
technologies as solutions to problems related to the remediation of hazardous wastes by identifying .
past uses of such technologies. To the extent possible, information is supplied in an identical format
for each state, so that comparisons can be made among the states of the numbers and types of
opportunities that might be available to vendors. However; the level of detail varies from state to
state, depending on the amount of data available and the accessibility of the data.
1.2 Remediation Programs at the EPA Regional Level .
This section discusses hazardous waste remediation programs in EPA Region 3. Although UST
programs are run by the states, RCRA authorities are delegated to the states, and Superfund programs
can be complemented by the states, regional staff of the Hazardous Waste Management Division are
responsible for EPA oversight of those activities. The EPA Region 3 Hazardous Waste Management
Division consists of two offices, the Office of RCRA Programs and the Office of Superfund
Programs. Information on opportunities in UST remediation and at Federal facilities is provided in
Sections 1.3 and 1.4. , -
RCRA
The Pennsylvania Operations Branch and the General Operations Branch reside in the Region's Office
of RCRA Programs. Those two branches of the Office of RCRA Programs oversee RCRA corrective
action activities, and the Compliance and Enforcement Branch oversees UST activities. The two,
RCRA branches divide responsibilities on a geographic basis: the Pennsylvania Operations Branch
manages all activities for Pennsylvania, and the General Operations Branch manages activities in the
other states in the Region. The two branches also manage all RCRA corrective action activities in the
. '.- ' ' ' ' . 1-3 , '''.'.-'' . -
-------
Middle-Atlantic region because no state in the Region currently is authorized to implement the
corrective action provisions of RCRA. Potential releases typically are identified through inspections
or RCRA facility assessments (RFA). Sources of potential releases are described by regulatory
authorities as solid waste management units (SWMU); more than one SWMU might be present at any
given facility. ' . . .
Typically, a RCRA permit writer or project manager reviews plans developed by a regulated facility
to investigate and correct, as appropriate, potential releases governed by the corrective action
provisions of RCRA. Upon identification of a potential release, the permit writer notifies the facility
and imposes a requirement that an RFI be performed. .
..' J .
If the RFI concludes that corrective measures are appropriate, a CMS will be developed. The CMS
f , *. " ,
results hi the selection of one or more cleanup methods that are implemented during the corrective
measures implementation (CMI). Vendors interested in competing for work, should focus on those
facilities where a CMS has been imposed and not yet been approved, because, in such cases,
technology vendors may not yet have been chosen. The event "CMS imposed" was chosen as a good
indicator of facilities requiring corrective action in the near-term. Once a CMS has been imposed, it
is almost certain that corrective action will be performed at a facility. Information on the number of
RFIs also is included because it gives a general indication of sites that will also undergo corrective
action in the near future. Also, due to the stabilization initiative, not every facility to be remediated
will require a CMS. The stabilization initiative encourages near-term measures,ranging from
exposure controls through pump-and-treat systems to contain groundwater. These measures need to
be implemented as early in the process as possible, preferably in the RFI. The stabilization initiative
directs implementers to stabilize facilities and then proceed to the next high priority facility, instead of
proceeding through to the final remedy. These sites may also present near-term opportunities.
' *
Table 1-1 below indicates the total number of facilities in Region 3 regulated under RCRA, the
number of facilities where a CMS has been imposed, and the number of facilities where a CMS has
been approved. The number of facilities with a CMS imposed is not a direct subset of RCRA
treatment, storage, and disposal (TSD) facilities, instead it is a subset of TSD facilities and hazardous
waste generators. While TSD facilities are statutorily required to address corrective action, EPA has
discretionary authority to impose corrective action on generators.
1-4
-------
Table 1-1
Total Number of RCRA Facilities and Facilities
Where a Corrective Measures Study Has Been Imposed in Region 3
:7-... -states :;
Delaware
District of Columbia
Maryland
Pennsylvania '
Virginia ' -.
West Virginia
TOTAL '", S^l
RCRA Faculties
12
- r
41
237
98
" - '. -35 ;
....'.'.- 424V;-
RCRA Facilities Where
A Corrective Measures
Study Has Been;
Imposed3
3 . ;
6
i
16.
14 , -.
' ' 5 -. , '
'-.. . & ' ':;*-:.-
RCRA FaciUtiesiWheref
A Corrective Measures;:,:
. Study Has Been "
Approved1'
o
o .-.'.' .
..;'.'. i: =' ',.' :
11
' ' . 4 .''
1
. ,: .'.ii;:^i7^-:;';- ' V.
Source: RCRIS Regional Oversight database, June 1995 . ". : ,
a- ' . Facilities where'a CMS, has been imposed are identified here because they present the best marketing opportunities for
, innovative technology vendors. ..
, . Facilities where a-CMS has been approved are identified here because they also present 'marketing opportunities for
innovative technology vendors. ' / ' .
; '," " . > ' ' " ' f *
' . ' . .',''' ,' '"
Table 1-2 belqw indicates the total number of facilities in Region 3 regulated under RCRA, the
number of facilities that have an RFI imposed, and the number of facilities where an RFI has been
approved. The number of facilities.-with. an.RFI imposed is not a direct subset of RCRA TSD
facilities, instead it is a subset of TSD facilities and hazardous waste generators. While TSD facilities
are statutorily required to address corrective action, EPA has discretionary authority to impose
corrective action on generators. . .
' " ' '."'' v .
CERCLA .. . .. ; , "/ ;'".: . . ;'; ,' .;, "
The process prescribed under the Comprehensive EnvironmentalResponse, Compensation, and
Liability Act (CERCLA) for listing a site on the NPL is to. perform a preliminary assessment (PA),
followed by a site inspection (SI). In cases in which situations immediately dangerous to human
health and the environment are detected through the PA or SI, a site may be subject to a removal
action to minimize that danger. Typically, however, data from the PA and SI are used to score the
1-5
-------
site under the Hazard Ranking System (HRS) to determine whether remediation is necessary. Sites
that score above 28.5 using the HRS are listed on the. NPL. Once a site has been listed on the NPL,
EPA begins to search for potentially responsible parties (PRP) and ensures the initiation of the
remedial investigation and feasibility study (RI/FS), Data from the RI/FS are used in selecting the
appropriate cleanup technologies and strategies for the site. - . , "
Table 1-2
Total Number of RCRA Facilities and Facilities
Where a RCRA Facility Investigation Etas Been Imposed in Region 3
State,
Delaware
District of Columbia
Maryland
Pennsylvania
Virginia
West Virginia
TOTAL
RCRA Facilities
12
1
41
237
98
' 35 . .
424-'V '-.
RCRA Facilities Where
A RCRA Facility
Investigation Has Been
Imposed3
'.'. ' ' 4
0
11
35
14
8
72
RCRA Facilities Where
A RCRA Facility
Investigation Has Been
Approved1"
. . 2- . ''
0
4 T
8
4
: .5 '
. 23~v ; - . ,
Source: RCRIS Regional Oversight database, June 1995
4 Facilities where an RH has been imposed are identified here because not every facility will go through a CMS.
Therefore, they also present marketing, opportunities for innovative technology vendors.
Facilities where an RFI has been approved are Identified here because they also present marketing opportunities for
innovative technology, vendors. - '
The results of the RI/FS, including the rationale for the selection of a remedy, are documented in the
Record of Decision (ROD). The ROD provides a variety of useful information to vendors, including
information about the technologies selected as the appropriate remedy for the site, the volumes of
waste potentially to be treated, and the rationale for selection or rejection of particular technologies.
After the ROD has been signe'd, remedial design (RD) begins, which is then followed by remedial
action (RA). For fund lead sites, the RD information is used in preparing the bidding documents for
the site. After completion of the bid process, the RA itself begins. PRP lead sites may follow a
1-6
-------
.similar, formal, bid process, or the PRP(s) may have engaged a firm to .perform the RI/FS and then
build, design, and operate the remediation.technology.during the RD/RA phase.
There are two branches in the Region 3 CERCLA Office that divide responsibility between removal
actions and remedial actions. The Removal Branch manages and works with the states on all ' ,
activities related to removal actions and the Remedial Branch manages and works with the states on
all activities related to remedial actions. All activities related to the listing of a site on the NPL and
its management thereafter are managed by these two branches. Table 1-3 provides information' on the
total number of NPL sites that present potential opportunities for innovative technology vendors in the
Middle-Atlantic region. Federal facility sites, specifically those managed by the DoD that have been
' placed on the NPL, are shown in Table 1-7 (presented on page 1-11). Table 1-4 provides information
on the total number of NPL sites with innovative technology projects in Region 3.
Table 1-3
Number of NPL Sites and Operable Units
Requiring Remediation in Region 3
State
Delaware
District of Columbia
Maryland
Pennsylvania
Virginia
West Virginia
;TQTA£/ V'.-.; ' -:'
Number of Sites
10
0 .
12
77
18
'- 4
;' '''.'.. ' 121
Number of
Operable Units
17 ' ,.
0
. ' 26
122
26
14
''o y'.. 205' >"4v-:
1-7
-------
Table 1-4
Number of NPL Sites in Region 3 in the Pre-Design
or Design Phase With Innovative Technology Projects
State
Delaware
District of Columbia
Maryland
Pennsylvania
Virginia
West Virginia
TOTAL
Pre-iJesign
0
. NA
0
6
0
0
...--. :-V.ff;,, .' ,.
:f ' Designy; ' '
1
NA '
0
1 '
3
1
-. :- 6:.^.'.'': -
.".^:':.V'To&t^v^<:
1
NA .
0
7 ,
3..
1
: .-'/' :, 12*;;>;- ' ;
Source: Innovative Treatment Technologies: Annual Status Report (Seventh Edition)
NA =* Not applicable; this state does not have any sites listed on the NPL. '
1.3 Remediation Programs at the State Level
This section discusses hazardous waste remediation programs in each of the Middle-Atlantic states1.,
Delaware, Maryland, and Pennsylvania have state programs that address abandoned hazardous waste
sites beyond those governed by RCRA or CERCLA. Delaware, Maryland, and Pennsylvania have
enacted legislation to identify and fund cleanup of abandoned hazardous waste sites. A discussion of
the process by which the states manage their programs is found in each state section. '
Table 1-5 presents the number of state abandoned hazardous waste sites presenting potential
opportunities under state hazardous waste cleanup programs. The data included in the table were
obtained from two separate sources. The number of sites identified as future opportunities by states
was based on interviews with state personnel and state lists of hazardous waste sites that require
remediation. The number of sites identified as needing attention was obtained from EPA's An
Analysis of State Superfand Programs: 50 State Study, 1993 Update.
1 Because no state in Region 3 has RCRA corrective action authority, there is no discussion of
state administered corrective actions in this section.
1-8
-------
Table 1-5 ,
Number of Abandoned Hazardous Waste Sites
in Region 3 Presenting Potential Opportunities
f
State
Delaware
District Of Columbia
Maryland
Pennsylvania
Virginia
West Virginia
;'t&T&:'3:;' " .._ J:K:j':
.Number of
Sites3'"
27
' NA ..
14
11
NAd
NAC " -
52.'" "'."
Number of Site^i; ;
r . :. /Identified ; as ;
Needing Attention0
89
: '..NA
343
50
. 310
. NA . '
;.v. - .192. . ";;;...;:
a NA = Not applicable; this state, does not have a state Superfund program. >
b Based on interviews with state personnel and .state lists of hazardous waste sites that require remediation. . . .
c ' . According to EPA's An Analysis of State Superfund Programs: 50 State Study, 1993 Update.
d Virginia no longer has a formal program to address abandoned waste sites; however, they are inventorying those
. .' waste sites. Virginia is encouraging cleanups of such sites through their-.Voluntary Remediation Program (VRP),
described further in Section 6.1. '..'> .''
,.-'',. - ' < , . ' ' - > ',"-,'
e West Virginia currently does hot have a formal program to address abandoned waste sites; however, on occasion, .
." they do cleanup such sites deemed necessary to mitigate risks to human health and the environment. These i cleanups
are funded by the West Virginia Hazardous Waste Emergency Response Fund described further in Section 7..1.
All states in the Middle-Atlantic region manage individual UST programs. Those programs'
regulations are similar to the Federal regulations, although some might-be more stringent. UST sites
' ' i ' ' ' . -
comprise the largest group of.sites requiring remediation in Region 3. As of July 1995, confirmed
releases had been reported at approximately 13 percent of the universe of active and closed tank sites
in the Middle-Atlantic region, as shown in Table 1-6. Of the confirmed'releases, cleanup has not yet
been initiated at 3,119 UST sites. ^.This number represents the difference between total "confirmed
releases" (28,257) and total "cleanups initiated" (25,138). The number of UST sites identified here as
marketing opportunities will change rapidly, because of the combination of rapid increases in the
number of confirmed releases and continuing site closures. State-specific information about obtaining
lists Of UST sites requiring remediation and state requirements for doing business are provided in
each state section. Because .specific data on individual sites are voluminous.* information is presented
'in this report only in summary form. . ; . ,
1-9
-------
Table 1-6
Underground Storage Tank Corrective Action Measures in Region 3 as of Third Quarter FY95
State
Delaware
District of Columbia
Maryland
Pennsylvania
Virginia
West Virginia
TOTAL
Active
Tanks
2,772 '
1,348
19,992 :
43,953
40,312.
8,904
117,281 . ';
Tanks
Closed
, 4,588
2,373
13,070 .
34,520
28,986
12,865
96,402
Confirmed!.
.. Releases;
1,9,41
610
11,718
5,637
6,617
1,734
28,257 ..
Cleanups
Initiated! '
1,649 .
499
10,718
.4,301
. 6,579
1,392
. 25,138.1 . . :
Cleanups;
Completed
"1,179
326
4,294
1,082
5,373
533
'12,787
Source: EPA Office of Underground Storage Tanks Quarterly Activity Report for Third Quarter of Fiscal Year 1995 (ending
June 30, 1995) . . - ' ' '.''''.'
1.4 Remediation Programs Managed by the Departments of Defense and Energy
Together, DoD and the Department of Energy (DOE) manage the largest remediation programs in the
world. According to the Defense'Environmental Restoration Program Annual Report to Congress for
Fiscal Year 1994, otherwise known as the DERP report, and the DOE 5-Year Plan, the average
yearly budget for remedial actions conducted by the two departments combined exceeds $10 billion
per year.
Although there are no DOE facilities in Region 3, DoD manages many installations in the Region
under its environmental programs. .
Nationally, DoD, through the Defense Environmental Restoration Program (DERP), is responsible for
cleaning up hazardous wastes and constituents at more than 21,000 sites on more'than 1,700 active
DoD installations and formerly used defense sites (FUDS). DERP is responsible for ensuring that the
program is meeting its cleanup targets, assisting DoD Components, (Army, Navy, Air Force, Defense
, ' ' ' '
Logistic Agency, Defense Nuclear Agency, and the FUDS Branch) with their cleanup strategies, and
assisting in the development of the budget. Decisions about individual cleanups at DoD installations
are made by staff of the DoD Components.
1-10
-------
As Table 1-7 indicates, there are 84 DoD installations located in EPA Region 3 that either are
projecting to spend more than $ 1 million on. all phases of remedial action activities or have three or
more sites. Of the 1,143 active sites at those installations, cleanup activities are planned for 743; the
remaining sites require no further response action. Contaminants found at DoD sites can include
hazardous wastes regulated under RCRA and CERCLA. The wastes typically found at such sites _
include: .'.-"' . "'.'"
. Petroleum, oil', and lubricants (POL)
Volatile organic compounds (VOC) - .
Heavy metals
' ' 'Acids .'.-.,' ....."'. " ' ;. . . .
The"contaminants listed above can be found in soils, sludges, groundwater, and surface water. ,
Specific-site data are discussed in each of the state sections examining the market at DoD sites.
Table 1-7
D6D Installations and Sites Located in Region 3 at Which Remedial Activities are Planned
State
Delaware
. District of Columbia
Maryland
Pennsylvania
Virginia
West Virginia
TOTAL
Number of
Installations3
' - ."5. .
3
,16
28 ,
27
' 5
, .- . . : - 84;-"" .
Active Sites"
. 58
' 11
355 :
198
'.468
53
1,143 :v .
Sites At Which
Cleanup Currently
Is Planned0 :
20
5'
271
154
' 243 . .-.: '
50 ''
/'S>V-743o;-;.. ^-.V'..
Source: Defense Environmental Restoration Program Annual Report to Congress for Fiscal Year 1994 .,'.-'
Installations where there are three or more sites and that have an estimate of more than $1 million for cleanup
activities.. . ' - - . - . . . . .
Sites at which some form of remediation activity (including studies, remedial design, remedial action, or interim
action) is planned or underway. . ' . .
Sites that indicate that a future remedial action is planned." This number might, increase as new sites are added to the
individual installation sites inventories. , ' .
1-11
-------
1.5 Summary of Findings for Each Site
This section provides a brief comparison and summary of the information appearing in the individual
state sections. Table 1-8 compares the numbers of marketing opportunities in the Middle-Atlantic
states. The table includes the number of abandoned hazardous waste sites identified by the state
programs as needing cleanup, NPL sites and operable units, RCRA sites for which a requirement for
a CMS has been imposed, RCRA sites for.which a requirement for an RFI has been imposed, USTs
that require cleanup, and DoD facilities and sites at those facilities.
Table 1-8
Comparative Statistics for Marketing Opportunities in the Middle-Atlantic States
.
Hazardous Waste Sites
Under State Programs
Requiring Remediation
NPL Sites Requiring
Remediation
Operable Units
RCRA Facilities at
Which a CMS is
Imposed* -
RCRA Facilities at
Which ah RFI is
Imposed*
Confirmed Release
UST Sites That
Require Cleanup*
DoD Installations
Sites at Which
Cleanup is Planned
Delaware
27'
10
'
17
3
,
2
- 292
5
20
District of
Columbia
NA
0
0
0
0
111
3
5
Maryland
14
12
26
0
7
1,000
16
271
Pennsylvania
11
77 '
117 '
5
27
J (
1,336
28
154
. Virginia
NA
18
34
10
10
38
27
243
: West' '
Virginia
NA .
4
14
4
3
342
5-
50
Total
'52
,
12t
208
22
49
3,119
84
743
Soiree: CERCUS, RCRIS, RELAI. the OUST Quarterly Activity Report for Third Quarter Fiscal Year 1995, state agency databases and the DERP report; see Section
1.8 foe a detailed description of the data sources.
Represents the difference between the number of CMSs or RFIs imposed -and the number that have been approved in each state.
i Represents the difference between the number of confirmed releases and the number of cleanups initiated in each state. '.
In reviewing the data available for each state, it was found that UST sites present the greatest
opportunity, in terms of absolute number of sites, (though not in complexity of remediation tasks) for
marketers of innovative technologies, followed by Dob sites, NPL sites, and in states that maintain an
abandoned hazardous waste site program, abandoned hazardous waste sites managed by the state.
1-12
-------
RCRA facilities subject to corrective action, at which a requirement for a CMS has been imposed, are
the smallest market in terms of absolute numbers of sites.' It is important to realize that, as time
passes, the RCRA segment of the market is likely to grow. Facilities, required to conduct RFIs are
not included in the summaries because they are not considered near-term opportunities. Based on
EPA experience at sites nationwide, the majority of those facilities are also likely to undergo some
form of corrective action. They may, however, represent longer term opportunities. ' -
Following are brief summaries of the markets in each state in EPA Region 3 that focus on near-term
opportunities] . ,
Delaware ' '-':.- . ' ; '. "'..'"/; ''
The State of Delaware provides the following near-term opportunities for vendors of innovative
technologies:
The State currently .has 27 sites subject to remediation under the State Hazardous
Substance Cleanup Act. (No data were available oh the progress of such,sites in the
remediation process.)
EPA manages an inventory of 19 NPL sites, 10 of which require further remedial
action. At those sites, 17 operable units present opportunities for vendors.
Three of the State's 12 RCRA facilities are under a requirement to conduct a CMS.
Current data on UST sites indicate that cleanup has not yet been initiated at 292 sites
with confirmed releases in Delaware. .'-
There are currently 20 sites at five DoD installations at which cleanup activities are
planned. -
District of Columbia
The District of Columbia provides the following near-term opportunities for vendors of innovative
.technologies. . . .
The District manages no abandoned hazardous waste sites nor does the District
contain any NPL sites. ; ! .
No RCRA corrective action activities are being conducted.
1-13
-------
Current data on UST sites indicate that cleanup has not yet been initiated at 111 sites
with confirmed releases in the District.
There are currently five sites at three DoD installations at which cleanup activities are
planned.
Maryland
The State of Maryland provides the following near-term opportunities for vendors of innovative
technologies. ' . .
The State currently has 14 sites subject to remediation under State regulations.
EPA manages an inventory of 13 NPL sites, 12 of which require further remedial
action. At those 12 sites, 26 operable units present opportunities for vendors'. ' -
* Current data on UST sites indicate that cleanup has not yet been initiated at 1,000
sites with confirmed releases in the State. ^ .
There are currently 271 sites at 16 DoD installations at which cleanup activities are
planned.
Pennsylvania' .
The Commonwealth of Pennsylvania provides the following near-term opportunities for vendors of
innovative technologies.
The Pennsylvania Priority List includes 11 sites, each of which requires remediation
expected to cost more than $2 million or take more than one year to 'complete.
EPA manages an inventory of 102 NPL sites. At those 102 sites, six Federal
facilities (all managed by DoD) and 77 NPL sites have 117 operable units that present
opportunities for vendors.
« Five of the State's 237 RCRA facilities are under a requirement to conduct a CMS.
Current data on UST sites indicate that cleanup has not yet been initiated at 1,336
sites with confirmed releases in the State.
» _ "
There are currently 154 sites at 28 DoD installations at which cleanup activities are
planned. These sites include the six facilities on the NPL that are mentioned above.
1-14
-------
Virginia
' ' ' ' f '"'.'
The Commpnwealth of Virginia provides the following nearTterm opportunities for vendors of
innovative technologies. .
' The State does not have a program to manage abandoned hazardous waste sites.
EPA manages an inventory of 24 NPL sites, 18 of which require further remedial
action. At those 18 sites, 34 operable units present opportunities for vendors.
Ten of the State's 98 RCRA facilities are under a requirement to conduct a CMS.
. Current data on lIST sites indicate that cleanup has not yet been initiated at 38 sites _
with confirmed releases in the State. '..-..'"-
There, are currently 243 sites at 27 DoD installations at which cleanup activities are
planned. . . '
' ' - / ' '
West Virginia
The State of West Virginia provides the following near-term opportunities for vendors of innovative
technologies. ; .
The State does not have a program to manage abandoned hazardous waste sites.
EPA manages an inventory of six NPL sites, four of which require further remedial
action. At those four sites, 14 operable units present opportunities for, vendors.
Four of the State's 35 RCRA facilities are under a requirement to conduct a CMS. -
Current data on UST sites indicate that cleanup has not yet been initiated at 342 sites.
with confirmed releases in the State.
There are currently 50 sites at five DoD installations at which cleanup activities are
planned. :
1.6 Survey of Innovative Treatment Technologies Typically Employed in Region 3
Information provided in this survey comes from EPA's Innovative Treatment Technologies: Annual
Status Report (Seventh Edition), published in September 1995. The Annual Status Report provides
1-15
-------
data on the use of innovative technologies at Superfund sites undergoing either remedial or removal
actions. It is also useful as a guide to the technologies that have been accepted in a particular state.
As Table 1-9 indicates, for the reporting period of the seventh edition of the Annual Status Report,
innovative technologies were selected or used in 19 remedial actions at NPL sites in Region 3. The
single most common innovative technology employed at NPL sites in Region 3 was soil vapor
extraction followed by thermal desorption. Across the Region approximately 10 percent of the NPL
sites reported in-the Annual Status Report, have used, innovative technologies. The most common
medium treated by the innovative technologies was soil, followed by groundwateir. The contaminants
most often treated by the specific technologies were VOCs and semivolatile organic compounds
(SVOC).
Specific information on numerous innovative treatment technologies and sites where they have been
employed is available in the Vendor Information System for Innovative Treatment Technologies
(VISITT), a free electronic database developed by TIO to assist vendors to market their technologies".
Information on how technologies are included iri'VISITT is provided in the figure box on page 1-18.
1.7 Sites Managed Under the Brownfields Initiative
. Twenty-nine cities across'the country have been selected as pilot projects that will revitalize
communities by redeveloping abandoned, contaminated industrial or commercial land known as
"Brownfields" and returning these properties to productive land use. The projects are pan of the .
Clinton Administration's Brownfields Economic Redevelopment Initiative, which was launched in
November 1993. The projects are targeted to receive $200,000 in funding from EPA over two years.
Region 3 projects are located in Baltimore, Maryland, Cape Charles and Richmond, Virginia, and
Philadelphia and Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. Appendix B includes EPA-produced fact sheets
concerning the Region 3 Brownfields Initiative pilot projects.
1.8 Sources of Data Used to Develop This Report
The data used to develop the discussion in each of the state sections were obtained from a variety of
resources, as shown in Figure 1-1 on page 1-19. These resources and the rationale used to obtain the
data are discussed below. In addition to the data from the databases, individuals from each state and
1-16
-------
from EPA were interviewed to validate information on state program status, agency addresses, and
availability of data. Appendix D presents a complete list of all data sources and references used in
developing this report.
Table 1-9
Innovative Treatment Technologies Used in Region*3
Technology
Bioremediation (ex situ)
Bioremediation (in situ)
Dechlorination
In situ Flushing .
In situ Vitrification
Soil Vapor Extraction
Soil Washing
Thermal Desorption
Chemical Treatment
Contaminated Recovery of
Oily Wastes (CROW)
Phyto-treatment ,
Plasma High Temperature
Metals Recovery
Solvent Extraction
Air Sparging
Dual-Phase Extraction
Passive Treatment Wall
ItOTAL
No. ofNPL
Sites3
2
1
1 '
0
0
9
0
4
1
1
0
, 1- '
0
'1
0
2'
- "':23::;' !
States
PA (1), WV (1)
..'. DE
VA ,
-
.-
DE (1), PA (6),.
VA<2)
. - ,
PA(2),VA(2)
VA
PA
-.
PA
:- _
.PA ;
"
PA (2)
,"..'.-' ;
Media
Treated11
SO,SD
SO
SL
"
-
SO
- -.
SO :
- SL
SO ,
' - '" '
so
- .
GW
' - -.
GW
',,"'.' - V
rnntaminantt:
Treated6
VOC, SVOC
VOC
SVOC
,
>
VOC, SVOC
' .
VOC, SVOC
VOC, SVOC
VOC
.- :
: Metals
-
VO.C
Metals
'-, -'".'"','-',[ ' :V;';'.
Source: Innovative Treatment Technologies: Annual Status Report (Seventh Edition) .
a ' -Nineteen NPL sites in Region 3 are using innovative treatment technologies; however, because one site may use more
than one technology, the total shown here is 23. . , . .
* ,-'- SO = soil, SD = sediment, SL = sludge, GW = groundwater
c VOC = volatile organic compounds, SVOC = semivolatile organic compounds . .
1-17
-------
j: tJsing VISITT in Marketing
r. .''.'*. >: -' '(.; ...;';.;,;.- ,.- ;,:'-::.-,v " ^ ^ -,, *
The Vendor Information System for innovative Treatment Technologies (VISITT) is a free electronic
database of innovative treatment technologies and vendors. Version 4.0 of VISITT, released in the
summer of 1995, contains current data on 325 innovative treatment technologies provided by more than
200 vendors. VISITT is a cost-effective way to market innovative treatment technologies to those
directly involved in selecting hazardous waste.remedies.. Currently, VISITT has an estimated 10,000
.users in 76 countries OEPA 1995h|' :Tfie database users include government personnel and responsible
parties who areI faced, jwith the time-consuming task of identifying and selecting the best remediation-
technology and the best vendor. Vendors of innovative technologies may wish to have their products
included in VISITT.; :".;."'v*\ ''"..'.. ..'.'-
To be included in VISITT, a-technology.must meet the following criteria:
It must be defined as innovative (for example, incineration, aboveground treatment of
groundwater, and solidification and stabilization are not eligible). Innovative technologies are
alternative treatment technologies (alternatives to land disposal), the use of which is inhibited
by lack of data on cost and performance. ;
It is; a technology for cleanup of hazardous waste sites (VISITT does not include companies
that only supply products, not does it include technologies that treat process wastes)
'- .-::;;. ?. : -.-.- ; ":.$#!!&': :'. '-<'.' , '}' " !",.," :' '
For more information on participating in trie next VKITT update, call EPA's Technology Innovation
Office at (703) 308-8800. EPA hijsjrnade the VISITT 4.0 software and user manual available for free
downloading on the Clean-Up Information Bulletin Board System (CLU-IN). CLU-IN is accessible
through the Internet address (clu-uijepa.gov) or via modem by dialing (301) 589-8368. VISITT also is
available for downloading torough the following access sites:- America Online, Simtel File Transfer
Protocol (FTP) Site, the Defense Environmental Network for Information exchange (DENK) (Telnet
128.174.5.51), and EPA's Site on the Internet (ftp.epaigov). Future access sites include: CompuServe
and Garbo FTP Site. : ; : . ' ,
t . ,';"'.-'.'.. , . . *
Instructions for downloading through.CLU-IN and the other access sites are available in the EPA
VISITT 4.0 Bulletin. For a copy o| the VISITT 4.0 Bulletin, or of VISITT 4.0 diskettes, write or send
a facsimile'to::,;, . ' ,: . . .'." ' . "
U.S. EPA/NCEPI;V"-'.-
P.O. Box 42419
Cincinnati, OH 45242-2419
or
U.S. EPA/NCEPI
(513) 489-8695 (Facsimile)
(513) 489-8190 (Verification)
1-18
-------
RCRA Corrective Actions
Figure 1-1
Sources of Data
Consisting of RID; SNAP;
RPM Survey; and CER'CLIS(EI)
databases:
Data on RGRA corrective actions
were obtained from the Resource
Conservation and Recovery
Information System (RCRIS) as
provided by EPA staff hi Region 3.
The data were obtained from the
RCRIS Regional Oversight database
in an attempt to identify not only the
names and addresses of the facilities,
but also any available data on the
contaminants, media contaminated,
and volume of media contaminated. In general, there was little information on contaminants or media
contaminated in the RCRIS Regional Oversight database for the states covered in this report.. (The
RCRIS National Oversight database does not include data fields for information on contaminants or
media.) Data were collected in May 1995 for all Region 3 states.
Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and
LiabDity Information System (CERCLIS)
Resource Conservation and Recovery Information System
(RCRIS) Regional Oversight database -
"EPA Office of Underground Storage Tanks Quarterly Report
; Responsive Electronic "
: Link Access interface:
(RELAI) >£;.; ",'.-'
t:NPL Site Summaries; r
Defense Environmental Restoration Program Annual Report to
;Congress for Fiscal Year 1994
Data on underground storage tanks (UST) regulated by EPA under RCRA Subtitle I were obtained
from the EPA Headquarters Office of Underground Storage Tanks (OUST). The information on the
numbers of UST sites was obtained from the OUST Quarterly Activity Report for the third quarter of
fiscal year 1995. For the purposes of this report, the number of tank sites in need of corrective
action was defined as the number of UST sites with "confirmed releases" minus the number of UST
sites with "cleanup initiated." This number provides only an estimate of-the number of UST sites
with confirmed releases currently in need of cleanup, because the number of USTs requiring cleanup
is very dynamic and changes on a monthly basis as new releases are confirmed and other tanks are .
closed. The duration of UST cleanups varies with site specific conditions although UST cleanups
generally occur more quickly than complicated RCRA or Superfund sites. The CERCLA and RCRA
programs can spend considerable tune determining the nature of the release, while the majority of -'.
leaking USTs contain petroleum, thereby reducing the time typically associated with identifying
contaminants. Some states regulate larger universes, of USTs through their own state programs than
are Federally regulated and, therefore, may have larger markets for UST-related technologies.
1-19
-------
Information about how to request data managed by the individual states is provided at the end of
every state section. . ". .
NPL Sites
Data on NPL sites were obtained from several sources, including the Comprehensive Environmental
Response, Compensation, and Liability Information System (CERCLIS), from which data were taken
in May 1995; the Responsive Electronic Link Access Interface (RELAI) database, which consists of
data taken from the Record of Decision (ROD) Information Database (RID) in September 1994; the
Superfund NPL Assessment Program (SNAP) database as of September 1993; risk assessment
documents collected during the survey of remedial project managers (RPM) conducted in August 1993
to respond to a Congressional inquiry (data available on 219 sites nationwide); and a review of the,
NPL site summaries for each site. Data from the RELAI database were retrieved in early June 1995.
Data from the sources listed above were combined into a single database that then was used to
develop the data needed for this report. ,
As in the case of RCRIS, several different events in the NPL process can be used to identify NPL
sites as promising targets for.marketing. The event "remedial action with the actual start date not -
reported" was selected as the indicator that would best lead vendors of innovative technologies to a
potential market. A blank start date for remedial action (RA) is the point at which the remedial
design (RD) has been completed but the actual technology vendor is yet to be selected, when EPA or
the "Fund" is the lead. According to information ^gathered by EPA in 1994, approximately 75
percent of the NPL remedial action work is led by potentially responsible parties (PRP). PRPs often
bid projects on a "turnkey" basis, with a contractor designing, building, and operating the technology
at the site. In cases in which the PRP is the lead, a vendor may wish to'become involved in the
process at the remedial investigation and feasibility study (RI/FS) or design phase when opportunities
may be available. DoD sites that are listed on the NPL are also discussed in the DoD data tables in
each state section and in Appendix A. -
Basic information about the NPL sites covered in this report, such as name, identification number,
and address, was obtained from CERCLIS, Information on media contaminated was obtained from
one of the following sources: CERCLIS (specifically the environmental indicators or El module)
provided data for sites where cleanup work has been accomplished and reported; RID provided data
for sites for which there are signed RODs, through fiscal year 1993; risk data from risk assessment
' 1-20 ' . .
-------
documents collected during the RPM survey provided data on contaminants and media; and SNAP
provided data on Hazard Ranking System (HRS) scoring information and site characteristics.
Information on volumes of contaminated media and technologies was obtained from CERCLIS El data
and RID. Data on site size were taken from SNAP and NPL site summaries.
DoD Installations and Sites
Data on DoD installations and sites were obtained from Tables B-l and B-2 of the DERP report. The
data obtained from the DERP report were used to determine the projected cost estimates for .
'remediation activities for each installation, the number of sites for which remediation is planned, and-
the total number of active sites. Because DoD's inventory of installations and sites is voluminous,
this study provides complete information only on those DoD installations that projected to spend more
than $1-million on all phases of remediation activities (defined as studies, remedial design, remedial
action, and interim actions) or had identified three or more sites (from .Table B-l of the DERP
report). Appendix A of this' report provides a list of those installations with two or fewer sites or
estimated costs for cleanup of less than or equal to $1 million (from Table B-2 of the DERP report).
The information in Appendix A is limited to the installation name, the state in which the installation is
located, the Federal facility identification number (FFID), the number of active sites on the
installation, and the amount projected to be spent. The reader should understand that the funding
estimates provided in this report are not yet obligated and are for DoD planning purposes only.
State-Managed Sites ;
Data on abandoned-hazardous waste sites managed by the individual state programs were obtained
from state-run databases and state-issued reports as well as from private vendors of information. In
almost all cases, the states maintain only a list of addresses of abandoned hazardous waste sites.
Information on the types of'media contaminated and their, contaminants is found only in the file
materials of the state agency charged with managing the sites. Information on state programs and
contacts found at the end of each state section should provide vendors with information necessary to
follow up leads oh state sites: ,
1-21
-------
1.9 Report Organization
To help vendors and technology developers identify specific market opportunities, the following
sections of this report provide information on waste sites and specific waste programs of the five
states and the District of Columbia comprising the Middle-Atlantic region. , The individual sections
are organized to include the following: . . . . .
t A brief introduction outlining the summary findings on the numbers, types, and
locations of sites in the state or District;
Relevant waste programs and authorities maintained by the state or District and the
structure of, those programs;
Market opportunities at abandoned waste sites that fall within state or District program
authorities; ' . . .
CERCLA sites in the state (the District of Columbia has no NPL sites);
RCRA corrective -action opportunities; .
Opportunities in the individual UST programs;
Markets for Federal facility sites (this section focuses on DoD installations because
there are no DOE sites in the region and only one NASA facility and one USDA
facility); and
Contacts for further information on conducting business at. sites in the state or
District. .
To the maximum extent practicable, the sections are organized uniformly to facilitate cross
referencing and comparison. However, not all sections include all information listed above. In some
cases the particular program section may not be relevant to the universe-of sites found in the state or
District.' . . .
1-22
-------
2.0 DEMAND FOR REMEDIATION OF SITES IN DELAWARE
This section provides a detailed discussion of the opportunities available in the State of Delaware for
vendors of innovative technologies. The section is organized in seven sections. The first describes
the State's program organization and authority. The next section discusses opportunities at sites
subject to Delaware's Hazardous Substance Cleanup Act. That section is followed by a similar
discussion of opportunities at Superfund National Priorities List (NPL) sites. The fourth and fifth
sections discuss the markets at Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RC&A) facilities subject to-
corrective action and at underground storage tank (UST) sites managed by the S^ate. .The next section
provides information on opportunities at Department of Defense (DoD) installations. The final
section of the chapter presents further useful information about working in the State.
Figures 2-1 and 2-2 present maps of
the State of Delaware that indicate
the locations of all the sites in
Delaware that are listed on the
NPL, and the RCRA facilities in the
State1. NPL sites in Delaware are
concentrated in the northern half of
the State.
; Some use of innovative technologies
has occurred in Delaware.
According to the Innovative
Treatment Technologies: Annual
Status Report (Seventh Edition), the
.technologies applied at Superfund
sites, in Delaware reportedly are in
situ bioremediation of soils and soil
Summary Information
Delaware,'although not heavily industrialized, does
have both a number of RGRA facilities subject to
corrective action and NPL sites. In addition, a State
program manages abandoned hazardous waste sites
and USTs'ji and remedial actions (RA) are planned at a
number of Dob installations in the State, The State'
has. 27 sites subject to remediation under the State
Hazardous Substance Cleanup Act. (No data were
available on the progress of such sites in the
remediation process.) The U.S.. Environmental
Protection-Agency (EPA) manages 10 NPL sites
where there are opportunities for innovative
technology vendors. Three of the-State's RCRA
facilities are under a requirement to conduct a
corrective measures study (CMS) that also will
provide opportunities to vendors. Two of the State's
RCRA facilities are under requirement to conduct a
RCRA facility investigation (RFI), that may provide
opportunity for vendors. Data on USTs indicate that
292 tank sites at five DoD,installations at which
cleanup activities are planned.
Figures 2-1 and 2-2 do not indicate the locations of all NPL sites or all RCRA facilities
located in Delaware. LandViewII contains information from.the Comprehensive
Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Information System (CERCLIS) on
NPL sites and other sites. It also contains information from the Biennial Reporting System
(BRS) on treatment, storage, and disposal facilities and major generators of hazardous waste.
2-1
-------
N
t
Wilmington.
Source: Modified from LandView II, based '
on data as of September 1994. Not to Scale
Figure 2-1
NPL Sites in Delaware
2-2
-------
N
t
i'Jr- Wilmington
Source: Modified from LandView II, based
'on data as of September 1994. Not to Scale
Figure 2-2
RCRA Facilities in Delaware
2-3 .
-------
vapor extraction. In addition, the technologies applied at UST sites include thermal desorption,
sparging combined with soil vapor extraction, soil vapor extraction, and in situ and ex situ
bioremediation. , . , r
air
2.1 The Delaware Hazardous Waste Management Program ;
The Delaware Hazardous Substance Cleanup Act of 1990 provides the State with the authority' to
perform emergency response actions, removals, and remedial actions. The law also establishes a fund
to clean.up such sites and allows for cost recovery. Delaware requires contaminated sites to be
remediated prior to any transfer of property. The Delaware Department of Natural Resources and
Environmental Control (DNREC) implements the law through its Superfund Branch, in the Air and
Waste Management Division. .As of-December 1993, there were 31 staff in the division (EPA
1993a). All contracting and oversight activities are managed from the branch.
According to the EPA report An Analysis of State Superfund Programs: 50-State Study, 1993
Update, Delaware's Hazardous Substance Cleanup Fund is used for program administration, site
investigation, studies and design, removals, remedial actions, emergency response, matching
Superfund monies, and operation and maintenance. Delaware's fund had a balance of $4 million at
the'end of fiscal year 1993. . , :
The Delaware UST Program administers the State's regulations governing USTs and leaking
underground storage tanks (LUST). The central office's UST Branch-houses both the UST and LUST
sections of'the tank program and has 20 staff members. The UST section is called the Compliance
Group, and the LUST section is called the LUST Remediation and Investigation Group. The program
operates under Title 7, and its underlying statute is Section 74 of the Delaware Code. Passed on July
12, 1985, the statute authorizes the/State to specify types of USTs and to require best management
standards for operating USTs and for cleanup and remediation of LUSTs.
The facilities and sites managed under the programs identified above are discussed in the following
sections..
2-4
-------
2.2 The Market at Abandoned Sites Managed Under State Authorities
DNREC's Inventory of Hazardous Substance Sites database currently lists 116 sites and indicates that
27 of those sites are subject to remediation under the Delaware Hazardous Substance Cleanup Act.
The database contains no information about whether the remediation process has begun at individual
sites. In addition, the database does not identify the contaminants, media contaminated, or the
volume or extent of contamination. Because the State of Delaware uses the same criteria in screening
sites, that EPA uses for the NPL, it is reasonable to assume that the sites listed in Table 2-1 will have
characteristics similar to those of sites described in Section 2.3 and summarized in Table 2-2. - Table
2-1 provides the names and addresses of the sites subject to remediation that are identified in
-1 ... . '. "
DNREC's Inventory of Hazardous Substance Sites database. . '.-
2.3, The Market at Abandoned Sites Managed Under the Federal Super-fund Program
EPA has listed 19 NPL sites in Delaware. Table 2-2 on page 2-7 summarizes information from the
Comprehensive Environmental Resppnse, Compensation, and Liability Information System
(CERCLIS) database on the status of NPL sites in Delaware, including the number of remedial
investigations and feasibility studies (RI/FS), remedial designs (RD), remedial actions (RA), and
removals that are planned, in progress, or complete. Currently, no additional sites in Delaware are
proposed for NPL listing. Of the 19 NPL sites, RODs have been signed for 17 of those sites. Of the
19 sites, 13 were listed in the 1980s; remediation activities are substantially complete at most of the
13 sites, and they provide little opportunity for vendors. Remedial actions are in progress at seven
sites, and remedial designs are in progress at three sites. Several other sites are slated for removal
activities only. At the time these data were obtained, two removals were underway. Table 2-3, at
the end of this section, lists 10 NPL sites at which remedial action at 17 operable units has not yet
begun. The sites and operable units of greatest interest to vendors are those for which technologies
have been selected but vendors of the technologies'have not yet been chosen. ;
,2-5
-------
table 2-1
Remedial Response Sites Under the Delaware Hazardous Substance Control Act
Site Name;
Castle Ford
Clayton TWP Landfill
Clayville Dump '
Container Corp.
DuPont Haskell Labs
Emulsion Products
Esham-Davis Fill Area
First State Steel Drum Co.
Fraziers Pit
Georgetown Coal and Gas
Holy Cross Landfill
Jackson Pit
Lewes Coal
Ludlow Ind. Park Drum Site
Metcalf Pit
Motor Wheel
Newport City Landfill
Newport Drum Site
Paradee Oil - Dover Site
Selbyville Dump
Simpson Lumber Co. Dump
Summit Airport
Sussex CO Landfill #2
Sussex CO Landfill #6
Sussex CO Landfill #1
Sussex CO Landfill #3
Sussex Lumber Co.
Site EPA ID
':f$$te-:- '
DEDOl 1021342 .
DED980918940
DED98 19034226
DED054734918
DED0643709992
DED088801576
DED984066878
DED980919328 .
DED981736697
DED984066183
DED011963675
DED981736739
DED984066209
DED981 104029
DED98 1736796
DED002334639
DED980705313
DED984066696
DEDOl 1006335
DED000862417
DED981 173762
DED984067066
DED98 1108400
DED98 1103955
DED981 103363
DED981111313 .
DED98 1104979
Site Address .
800 Wilmington Road, New Castle 19720
Duck Creek Pkwy, Clayton 19938
Not Available, Christiana 19711
Braridywine Park, Wilmington 19899
Elkton RD, Newark 19711
1100 Nanticoke Street '#731, Seaford 19973
Rd 389, Williamsville 19975
PO Box 365, Bear 19701
Route 13, Dover 19901
Not Available, Georgetown 19947
N State Street, Dover 19901
Route 276, Lewes 19958
Kings Highway off Route 9, Lewes 19958 '
Locke Road, .Edgemoor 19809 -
County RD 285, Lewes 19958
1901 Ogletown Road, Newark 19711
Water Street & Cooper Drive, Newport 19804
Maryland Avenue & Kraminsi Road, Newport 19804
Denny s Road, Dover 19901 . .
County RD 386, Selbyville 19975
Tidbury Drive, Dover 19901
Route 896, Middletown 19709
Route 20, Stockley 19947.
County RD. 373, Omar, 19945
County RD 594, Bridgeville 19933
Off Route 288 N of Angola, Angola Beach 19951
Route 227, Lewes 19958
Source: Delaware Department of Ninnal Resources and Environmental Control
A review of the NPL site summaries and the data from CERCLIS indicates that most NPL sites in
/
Delaware are contaminated with volatile organic compounds (VOC) in both the soil and groundwater.
Polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons (PAH) are present at several sites. The presence of metals and
polychlorinated biphenyls (PCB) also is reported in several cases. The contaminated areas range in
size from 1 acre to as many as 317 acres. Figure 2-3 on page 2-8 presents data on the size
2-6
-------
distribution of the 10 sites that present opportunities for vendors. No data were available on the
volume of contaminated soil or grpundwater to be remediated. . /
Table 2-2
Number of Sites and Operable Units at Federal NPL Sites in Delaware
Phase of Activity
Remedial Investigations/Feasibility Studies
Planned
In Progress «
Complete (RD not started)
Remedial Designs
Planned
In Progress
Co'mplete (RA not started)
Planned
In Progress
Complete
.Removals - ^*£1:;1.," ' . '.
Started '
Complete .
Number of Sites
"'. ' 1
4
1 .2,-
. -
. . -. 7
3
1
- .-'..-.-. .-.,.-.
10
7
7
.;. - ' : :;, :
9
1
Number of
Operable Units
1
-, ' 9
' : 2
' ' "; ' ''.
12
. . . 4 : '
. i
" .
.17
7'
10
-,',;:-' '::', .;' '':'.'''-' '.".' '.'"'
9
.'-' 7
Source: Data as of May 1995 from EPA CERCLIS database; see Section 1.8 for a detailed description of the data sources. ' .
Several technologies have been selected for use at these NPL sites. The technologies selected include
biodegradation, air stripping, soUdification and stabilization, arid vitrification. .
2.4 The Market at RCRA Corrective Action Sites ,- .
Although Delaware is authorized to issue RCRA Part B hazardous waste management permits for
hazardous waste facilities, it is not authorized to administer the corrective action program; all
corrective action activities are managed by EPA Region 3. Delaware does not have a separate State-
mandated corrective action program for operating hazardous waste facilities.
f ' , _
Data from the Resource Conservation and Recovery Information System (RCRIS) database indicate
there are 12 RCRA facilities in the State: 4 land disposal units, 2 incinerators, and 12 storage and
2-7
-------
3-
0-r
Figure 2-3
NPL Site Size Distribution for State of Delaware
<1-30
>120
treatment units2. Three of the RCRA facilities currently require corrective action. The definition of
such facilities used here includes any facility that has been required to perform a corrective measures
study (CMS). Mostof those facilities are concentrated in the northern third of the State. The
number of facilities with a CMS imposed is not a direct subset of RCRA treatment, storage, and
disposal (TSD) facilities, instead it is a subset of TSD facilities and hazardous waste generators.
While TSD facilities are statutorily required to address corrective action, EPA has discretionary
authority to impose corrective action on generators. In addition, two facilities are currently under a
requirement to conduct a RCRA facility investigation (RFI). The number of facilities with an RFI
imposed is not a direct subset of RCRA TSD facilities, instead it is a subset of TSD facilities and
hazardous waste generators. While TSD facilities are statutorily required to address corrective action,
EPA has discretionary authority to impose corrective action on generators. As discussed hi Section
1.2, these facilities may also provide either a long-term.opportunity where no CMS is necessary to
begin corrective action, or corrective activity begins in accordance with the stabilization initiative.
2 A facility may be included in more than one of these categories.
2-8
-------
As Table 2-4 at the end of this section indicates, data from RCRIS show that three RCRA facilities
have a requirement for a CMS imposed upon the entire facility. No data were available in RCRIS to
indicate the media, contaminated or the contaminants of concern. Contaminants typically found at
RCRA facilities include VOCs, semivolatile organic compounds (SVOC), petroleum products, and
metals., . .
2.5 The Market at UST Sites Managed by the State
As shown in .Table 2-5 below, Delaware has 2,772 active tank sites. Active tanks are defined as
tanks still in service (EPA 1995e). Confirmed releases have occurred at 70 percent of the active
tanks in Delaware. As of July 1995, the State has reported to EPA's Office of Underground Storage
Tanks (OUST) 1,941 confirmed release sites in Delaware. Cleanup has yet to be initiated at 292 of
those sites.
Table 2-5
Underground Storage Tank Corrective Action Measures
in Delaware as of Third Quarter FY95
'VX; Active! ;';;'
'.'-.,'^_i '.',, !::''', ' . ;:
', '' Tanksiv-.'" ,
2,772
Tanks
Closed
4,588
Confirmed
Releases
1,941
Cleanups
Initiated
1,649
Cleanups;.
Completed
1,179
The number of. USTs identified as marketing opportunities for vendors of innovative technologies will
change rapidly because of the combination of rapid increases in the number of confirmed releases and
continuing site closures. In national studies of USTs performed by EPA in 1991 and 1992, it was
found that the majority, or about 87 percent, of tanks are used to manage gasoline or diesel fuel,
kerosene, and heating oil. Of the remaining USTs, 13 percent manage other materials and wastes,
such as used oil (4 percent), hazardous materials (2 percent), and other material (5 percent), or are
empty (2 percent). The majority of the contamination problems are related to VOCs and SVOCs in
soils and groundwater (EPA 1992a, 1992b). According to DNREC, the UST program has used
thermal desorption, air sparging combined with soil vapor extraction, and in situ and ex situ
bioremediation. ' " .
2-9
-------
2.6 The Market at Federal Facility Sites in Delaware .
, "*.,, .
As is the case with all of the other states in Region 3, there are no Department of Energy (DOE)
facilities in the state where remedial actions are planned. There are five active DoD installations and
formerly used defense sites (PUDS) in Delaware where remedial actions are planned. Those DbD
installations and FUDS include 58 active sites, at 20 of which remediation currently is planned.
The Defense Environmental Restoration Program Annual Report to Congress for Fiscal Year 1994
(DERP report) indicates that a total of approximately $49 million in funding is estimated to be needed
through the year 2030 in all phases of cleanup at the five installations. The bulk of those funds ($31
million) is allocated to Dover Air Force Base (which is listed on the NPL), with the smallest amount
of funds allocated to Fort Miles Military Reservation, a FUDS.
No data are available on volumes of soil and groundwater to be treated. Table 2-6 provides
information on the individual installations in the State and the sites that are subject to remediation at"
those installations. Staff at each installation determine the individual sites at which they plan to
perform remedial actions. Cleanup already may be underway at other sites. However, these sites are
not included in the table because it is unlikely that they will afford an opportunity for vendors of '
innovative technologies. Of the installations included, hi the table, only Dover Air Force Base is
listed on the NPL. .
S - ,,'.."
2.7 Further Market Information for Delaware .
To bid on state contracts in Delaware, it is necessary to register with the State Division of
Purchasing. A request to register must be sent on company letterhead; briefly stating the company's
qualifications. The request should be sent to: .
Ms. Janet Schukoske
Division of Purchasing
P.O. Box 299
Delaware City, DE 19706
2-10
-------
Table 2-6
DoD Installations and Sites in Delaware at Which Cleanup is Planned3
/
Name, Address,
and Outyear Funding ($000)
Dover AFB ,
Outyear Funding FY95-2030
; $31,534 .
Ft. Miles Military Reservation
Outyear Funding FY95-2008
$2,145
Gov. Bacon Health Center
'Outyear Funding FY95-2008
$7,879
Greater Wilmington Airport
Wilmington
Ojutyear Funding .FY95-2002
$3,696
New Castle Army Air Field
Outyear Funding FY95-2008
$3,483
All Other Installations
$8,081
Federal Facility
Identification
Number
DE357182401000
DE39799F 133300 -.
DE39799F134200
DE357282427400
DE39799F135900
-
Codesb
. -A,N
A,F
F
' : A"
F
" .-
Number of Sites at
Which Cleanup
is Planned
8
; .- ,3
' ' ' >
,- - 4
; 3' .
-.* ~ *\ ' '
2
.
Source: Defense Environmental Restoration Program Annual Report to Congress for Fiscal Year 1994 ' '.'.-
a Includes installations with funding for cleanup of more than $1 million and with three or more active sites.
,b . Codes:
A = The. installation is currently active, and covered by Defense Environmental Restoration Account (DERA) funds.
F = The installation is no longer active and is managed by the FUDS Branch.
N = The site is listed,on the final National Priorities List. . .' ,
After the purchasing division receives the letter, it sends the company an application to register with
the State. Registration will allow the company to bid on state contracts. Information on bids is
published in local newspapers. If a contract is awarded, the winning company either must have a ,
license from the State of Delaware or must initiate the prpcess of obtaining such a license. A vendor
that wishes to obtain information about sites in Delaware managed by EPA may write to:.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
.Regions '
841 Chestnut Building
Philadelphia, PA 19107
2-11
-------
For Information on RCRA facilities, the envelope should be marked to the attention,of the Freedom
of Information Act Officer, Office of RCRA Programs. For information on Comprehensive
Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA) facilities, the envelope should
be marked to the attention of the Freedom pf Information Act Officer, Office of Superfund Programs.
The requester may be billed for the information, depending on the volume of information requested.
Information is also available on the names and addresses of the UST sites in the State that require
remediation. A vendor may write to:
Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Control
Division of Air and Waste Management .
Waste Management Section .
Underground. Storage Tank Branch
715 Grantham Lane .
Newcastle, DE 19720-4801
For information on sites currently subject to Delaware's Hazardous Substance Cleanup Act, vendors"
may write to: " "
Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Control
Division of Air and Waste Management
"Waste Management Section
, Superfund Branch
715 Grantham Lane
Newcastle, DE 19720-4801
There is a charge for each-report requested, depending on the volume of material.
2-12
-------
NPL Sites in Delaware at Which Marketing Opportunities Exist3
. ' . Operable Unit'
Number . Name (Lead)
RA Planned
" Start Dateb
SITE NAME: CHEM-SOLV, INC
NPL STATUS:. Final
01 ' (PS/FE/RP)
SITE NAME: DELAWARE CITY PVC PLANT
NPL STATUS: Final
03 NA , (RP/FE)
3/30/95
P
RI/FS
Completed
Y
Media
EPAID::.PED98071
SIZE: 2 Acres
GW
Volum.e
114.1:. :- V .
NA
EPA ID: DED980551667
SIZE: 180 Acres
10/02/99
N
GW;SO
NA
Contaminants
Technology
: ADDRESS: I76A N DUPONT HIGHWAY; DOVER, DE 19901
TYPE: NA
METALS; VOCs
Monitoring; Pump and Treat at POTW with
Discharge; Air Stripping Technologies; Disposal of
Residual; Off-Site Treatment; Steam Stripping
ADDRESS: RTE 13 & SCHOOL HOUSE RD; DELAWARE CITY, PE
, 19706
TYPE; , Manufacturing Chemicals; Plasiic Resins
NA
NA
SITE NAME: DELAWARE SAND & GRAVEL LANDFILL EPA ID: DED000605972 ; ADDRESS: 22? GRANTHAM LN; NEW CASTLE, DE 19720
NPL STATUS: Final . SIZE: " 10 Acres' K! ;,: : .: TVPEs > ; Abandoned -No Use; Refuse Systems-Co-disposal Landfill
04 NA (RP)
05 NA " (RP)
6/30/95
3/31/96 .
N
N
DB;ST
NA
NA
' NA
. NA '
NA
: . . NA
NA .
SITE NAME: DOVER AIR FORCE BASE ' " EPA ID: DE8570024010 . ' ADDRESS; RTE 113; DOVER. DE -19^01 / .:: : ^^?:'V . ; : ^ :
NPL STATUS: Final , SIZEt 44 Acres .TYPE: Undeveloped Land (inqjudiiigfestS.-field^weiJajiids);; : , i
- - " '.'.-'"'." ' ' -.' Recycling Waste OH: :f; " V" :;;-"'.v::;'":' ; :i
04 HWTANK . -(FF)
05 AREA 6 GROUND WATER (FF)
06 DRAINAGE AREA DRAINAGE
DITCH 1 (FF)
07 REMAINING SOURCES j. . (FF)
08 AREA 4 GROUNDWATER (FF)
09 AREA 5 GROUNDWATER (FF)
1,2/31/96
6/30/97' .
.9/30/98
9/30/98
9/30/98
9/30/98
N
N
N
N
N
N
GW;SO
GW
SD;SO;SW
GW;SO
NA
NA -
NA
NA
NA
NA ;
NA
NA
NA
..- NA . :
.NA-
NA
. NA. - '
'-'. NA ,
. . " NA .
NA
NA :
. '.. " - NA -
NA . '
NA . -":'"
Sim NAME: VV DOVER GAS LIGHT CO EPA ID: DED980693550 - / ADDRESS: NEW ST; DOVER, DE 19962 ,
NPL STATUS: Final ;i;; . : " SIZE:.. 1 Acre TYPE: Automobile Parking ,
01 NA ' .(RP/FE)
7/15/97 j Y
DB;GW;SL;SO
NA
NA
NA
a Data as of May 1995 from EPA CERCLIS and RELAI Databases. See Section 1.8 for a detailed description of these data Sources.
b Some RA planned start dates have passed; the actual RA start date had not been recorded as of March 1995. This circumstance may have occurred because (1) the project is
running later than planned or (2) the actual RA start date was recorded after the data were extracted. ' ' ." '- ;
Abbreviations: . . - .
AI
DB
DK
EP
ES
Air'
-Debris
Unknown
EPA In-House
Entire Site
JF
FE
FF
GW
LW
EPA Fund-Financed .
Federal Enforcement
Federal Facilities
'Groundwater
' Liquid Waste
MR
MS
NA
NO
OT
Mixed Funding Federaf/RP
Man-made Structures
Not Available
No.Media
.Other .
PS
RA
RC
RP
S
PRP Response Under State
. Remedial Actions
RC'RA Hazardous Waste
Responsible Party
State, Fund-Financed
SD
SI
SL
SO
SR
Sediment ' i "
Single Intake
Sludge
Soil
PRP Lead Under State
ST
SW
UXO
VOCs
Solid Waste
Surface Water ..
Unexploded Ordnance
Volatile Organic
Compounds
2-13
-------
Table 2-3 (continued)
NPL Sites k Delaware at Which Marketing Opportunities Exist8
Operable Unit
Number Name (Lead)
RA Planned
Slart Da(eb
RI/FS
Completed
Media
Volume ' ,
Contaminants
Technology
SITE NAME: B.I. DU PONT DE NEMOURS (NEWPORT LANDFILL) EPA ID: DED980555122 ADDRESS: JAMES & WATER STS; NEWPORT, DB 19804
NPLSTATUS: Final , SIZE: 7 Acres TYPE: Park/Recreational Area; Misc, Laboratory Wastes; Industrial
: :-:.- '. . V : -Organic Chemicals, Wasiewaler Treatment Plant ,
01 NA (RP/FE)
6/30/01
Y
AI; GW; SD; SO;
SW
NA
METALS; VOCs
Monitoring: Air Stripping Technologies; Disposal of
Residual; .Precipitation; Surface Capping Only
SITE NAME: HALBY CHEMICAL CO . EPA IDi DBD980830954 ' N ADDRESS: 600 TERMINAL^ AVEj NEW CASTLErDE?!^ l
NPLSTATUS: Final. ' gJZEi 2 Acres " TYPE!- Other ;:.'-;-*::;:- , ':.^^'-^"'"'-"'-^.^ ':
01 SURFACE SOIL-
OPERATINQ FACILITY (F/RP)
02 GROUND WATER &
SURFACE WATER (F/RP)
9/30/95 '
4/15/98-
Y
N
DB;SO
GW;SD;SW
NA
NA
METALS; VOCs
NA
Disposal of Residual; Off-Site Treatment; Surface
Capping Only; Solidification and Stabilization;
Monitoring
NA
SITE NAME: . KOPPERS CO.. INC; (NEWPORT PLANT) EPA ID: DED980552244 , ADDRESS: FOOT OP LINDBURQ ST- NEWPORT DE 198Q4
NPLSTATUS: Final. : , v . SIZE: 317 Acres TYPE: : Abandoned - No Use
01 KOPPERS SITE . (RP/FE/F)
3/15/00 1 N
DK
NA ] NA f NA-
SITE NAME: STANDARD CHLORINE OF DELAWARE. INC EPA ID: DED041212473 ' ADDRESS: GOVERNOR LEA RD. FOB 319- DELAWARE CITY DE
NPLSTATUS; Final, J5JZE: 46 Acres ,. ' 19706 ,
TYPE: Industrial Organic Chemicals
. 01 NA - (PS/S/RP) 1 8/31/97
Y AI; GW; MS; SD; NA.
1 SO; SW |
NA 1 . NA
SITE NAME: TYLER REFRIGERATION PIT - EPA ID: DED980705545 :: ADDRESS: GLENWOODAVE; SMYRNA, DE; 19977 !:
NPLSTATUS: Final .. ; : . ' :V ; ; . ' . :. :, '.. SIZE; 51 Acres , ,:. :: TVPE: Miscellaneous Metalwork .= -v . :
01 NA - (RP/FE)
8/30/99 .
' N
GW;RC
NA .
NA
NA
a Data as of May 1995 from EPA CERCLIS and RELAI Databases. See Section 1,8 for a detailed description of these data sources.
b Some RA planned start dates have passed; the actual RA start date had not been recorded as of March 1995. This circumstance may have occurred because (1) the project is
running later than planned or (2) the actual RA start date was recorded after the data were extracted.
AI
DB
DK
EP
BS
Air '
Debris
Unknown
EPA In-House
Entire Site
F
FE
FF
GW
LW
. EPA Fund-Financed
Federal Enforcement
Federal Facilities
Groundwater
Liquid Waste
MR
MS
NA
NO
OT
Mixed Funding Federal/RP
Man-made Structures
Not- Available
No Media
Other
PS
RA
RC
RP
S
PRP Response Under State
"Remedial Actions '
RCRA Hazardous Waste
Responsible Party
State, Fund-Financed
SD
. SI
SL
SO
- SR
Sediment '
Single Intake
Sludge
Soil
PRP Lead Under State
ST
SW
UXO
VOCs
Solid Waste
Surface Water
Unexploded'Ord nance
Volatile Organic
Compounds
-------
Table 2-4
RCRA Facilities in Delaware Currently Undergoing Corrective Action?
Site Name
Mailing Address
DUPONT DE NEMOURS, E I & CO INC
400 WOODLAND RD
SEAFORD.DE 19973-3439
DUPONT-GLASGOW BUSINESS COMM
PO BOX 6101 GBC BOX 116
NEWARK, DE 19714-6101
OCCIDENTAL CHEMICAL CORP
PO BOX 550
DELAWARE CITY, DE 19706
, EPA ID
DED002348845
DED042263764
DED003913266
SWMU and Unit Names
ENTIRE FACILITY
ENTIRE FACILITY
ENTIRE FACILITY
Data as of May 1995 from the EPA RCRIS database. See Section 1,8 for a detailed description of data sources.
2-15
-------
THIS PAGE IS INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
2-16
-------
3.6 DEMAND FOR REMEDIATION OF SITES IN THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
i ' . - ' " , . ' i ..'.''"'
This section provides a discussion of the opportunities available in the District of Columbia for
vendors of innovative technologies. The section is organized in four sections. The first section
. describes the District's hazardous waste management program, which focuses on management of
underground storage tanks (UST) and UST remediation. The next section discusses opportunities in
the remediation of UST sites. The third section .discusses Department of Defense (Dob) installations
in the District that might present, marketing opportunities for vendors of innovative technologies. The
final section of the chapter presents a brief discussion about working in.the District.
Figure 3-1 presents a map of the
District of Columbia that indicates
the locations of the RCRA facilities
in the District1. There are no NPL
sites in the District. The RCRA
' . " ' f' -
facilities are distributed relatively
evenly across the District.
There is no innovative technology
use occurring at hazardous waste ,
sites in the District.
Summary Information
Because the District is small and very: highly .
industrialized, there are;few opportunities for vendors
of innovative technologie|;:for hazardous waste site
cleanup. The District manages no abandoned
hazardous waste sites andCcontaiiis no: Superfund
National Priorities List'(NPL) sites. In addition, no.
facilities are currently under a requirement to conduct
a corrective: measures study| (CMS). However, data
.on USTs! indicate that 111 tank sites in the District
are in need of cleanup. There are also five sites at
three DbD installations at which cleanup activities are
planned. ' '-. ; ";-.^-- .;...; . ' ->",'
3.1 The District of Columbia Hazardous Waste Management Program
The Hazardous Waste Management Act of 1978 (D.C. Code §§6-701 as amended) authorizes the
mayor to take "the actions necessary to terminate" a permit where persons have not taken corrective
actions resulting from a notice of violation. The District of Columbia Department of Consumer and
Regulatory Affairs manages the District's UST and Leaking Underground Storage Tank (LUST)
programs under its UST Branch. Pursuant to the District of Columbia Underground Storage Tank
(DC UST).Management Act of 1990, D.C. Code §§ 6-99.5 and DC UST Regulations, 20 District of
Columbia Municipal Regulations (DCMR) §§ 55-68 (40 District of Columbia Register [DCR] 7835)
Figure 3-1 does not indicate the locationsofall RCRA facilities located in the District of Columbia.
LandView II contains information from the Biennial Reporting System (BRS) on treatment, storage,
and disposal facilities and major generators of hazardous waste. . ,. ,
3-1
-------
N
tr
Virginia
Maryland
Source: Modified from LandView II, based
' on data as of September 1994. Not to Scale
figure 3-1
RCRA Facilities in the District of Columbia
3-2
-------
and 40 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 280, the DC UST Branch manages the UST program
and the LUST, program. The UST Branch regulaies petroleum and hazardous substance USTs. There -
are approximately 8,000 Federally and District regulated UST systems in the District. In the District
-of Columbia, there are no abandoned hazardous waste sites for which the District is responsible. .The,
UST Branch has 11 staff members. The program is authorized under RCRA Subtitle I and enforces
the same standards as the RCRA UST regulations (40 CFR Part 280). Currently,' the District does
not administer either the RCRA base program or the corrective action program. It is seeking
authorization for the RCRA, base program. The District's hazardous waste program is partially
funded by Federal grants (EPA 1993a). > , : ,
3.2 The Market at UST Sites Managed by the District
As shown hi Table 3-1, the District has 1,348 active tanks, the smallest number of active tanks in
Region 3. Active tanks are defined as tanks still in service (EPA 1995e). It also has the smallest
' .number of tanks closed in the Region, 2,373. As of July 1995, the District had reported to EPA's
Office of Underground Storage Tanks (OUST) 610 confirmed releases. Cleanup has yet to be
initiated at. Ill of those sites. .
Table 3-1
Underground Storage Tank Corrective Action Measures
in the District of Columbia as of Third Quarter FY95
Active
Tanks
.-. 1,348
Tantei:;:^-
ciosedte^i;;-;'.;
. 2,373
Confirmed
Releases
610
Cleanups
Initiated
499
Cleanups
Completed
: 326 J
. The numbers of USTs identified as marketing opportunities for vendors of innovative technologies
will change rapidly, because of the combination of rapid increases in the number of confirmed
releases and continuing site closures. In national studies of USTs performed by EPA in 1991 and
1992, it was found that the majority, or about 87 percent, of USTs are used to .manage gasoline or
diesel fuel, kerosene, and heating oil. Of the remaining USTs, 13 percent manage other materials .
and wastes, such as used oil (4 percent), hazardous material (2 percent), and other material (5
percent) or are empty (2 percent). The majority of the contamination problems are related to the
3-3
-------
contamination of soils and groundwater with petroleum products that contain volatile organic
compounds (VOC) and semivolatile organic compounds (SVOC) (EPA 1992a, 1992b).
3.3 The Market at Federal Facility Sites in the District of Columbia
As is the case with-all of the other states in Region 3, there are no Department of Energy (DOE)
facilities in the District where remedial actions are planned. Three active DoD installations are
located in the District. The installations have 11 active sites, and remediation is planned at five of the
sites.. The total number of sites to be remediated may exceed that figure because, in general, DoD
does not plan remediation at a site until the remedial investigation and feasibility study (Rl/FS) has
been completed.
The 'Defense Environmental Restoration Program Annual Report to Congress for Fiscal Year 1994
i ' ' ",.'
(DERP report) indicates'that a total-of approximately $33 million in funding is estimated-to be needed
through the year 2010 in all phases of cleanup at the three installations. The bulk of the funds ($28 '
million) is allocated to Boiling Air Force Base, with the smallest amount of funds allocated to Walter
i ' _ " ₯ ""'
Reed Army Hospital ($1.3 million).
Data on volumes of soil and groundwater to be treated are not available. Table 3-2 provides
information about the individual installations and sites subject to remediation at.the installations. Staff
at each installation determine the individual sites at which they plan to perform remedial actions.
Cleanup may already be underway at other sites and, therefore, such sites have not been included in
the table because it is unlikely that they will afford marketing opportunities for vendors of innovative
.technologies. None of'the DoD installations hi the District has sites, listed on the NPL.
3.4 Further Market-Information for the District of Columbia
To bid on work in the District, it is necessary to be certified by the Minority Business Opportunity
Commission. A certification package may be requested by telephoning'the Department of Human.
Rights and Minority Business Development at (202) 724-1385. Information on bids is published in
the local newspapers. The District also provides opportunities to non-minority businesses.
3-4
-------
Table 3-2
DoD Installations and Sites in the District of Columbia at Which Cleanup is Planned3
Name, Address,
and Outyear Funding ($000)
Walter Reed Army Medical
Center
Washington, DC 20307-5000
Outyear Funding FY95-2002
$1,317
Washington, DC NAVSECSTA
Outyear Funding FY95-2010
$4,279
Boiling Air Force Base 20332-5000
Outyear Funding FY95-2003
$27,710
All Other Installations
$22,565 . . '
Federal Facility
Identification
Number
DC3210021 15600
DC317002347600
DC357042444300
. ' *
Codesb
A-
A
A
"-
Number of Sites at Which
Cleanup is Planned
" ';. ° . "r .
1 ' '
' ..4 '. .'' . ..
, > ' ' - - - '
Source: Defense Environmental Restoration Program Animal Repon to Congress for Fiscal Year 1994 , ,
a Includes installations with funding for cleanup of more than $1 million and with three or more active sites.
,b ".Codes: ' ' '" "''.-. : -...'' ' '
. A = The installation is currently active and covered by Defense Environmental Restoration Account (DERAJ funds!
' . ' ' VL. , .' ' ' .. ; .
A vendor that wishes to obtain information about sites in the District of Columbia managed by EPA
may write to: .
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Regions
841 Chestnut Building
Philadelphia, PA 19107
For information on RCRA facilities, the envelope should be marked to the attention of the Freedom
of Information Act Officer, Office of. RCRA Programs: For information on Comprehensive
Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA) facilities, the envelope should
be marked to the attention of the Freedom of Information Act Officer, Office of Superfund Programs,
The requestor will be billed for the information, depending on the volume of information.
3-5
-------
Information is also available on the names and addresses of the UST sites in the District that are
currently in need of remediation. A vendor may write to:
Ms. Habeiba Israel
FOIA Officer
Department of Consumer and Regulatory Affairs
2100 Martin Luther King Jr. Avenue S.E., Suite 203
Washington, DC 20020-5732 "
There is a charge for each report requested, depending on the volume of material.
3-6
-------
4.6 DEMAND FOR REMEDIATION OF SITES IN MARYLAND
This section is organized in seven sections. The first section describes Maryland's hazardous waste
management program and its regulatory authority. The next two sections discuss the market at
abandoned hazardous waste sites managed by the State, and the market for National Priorities List
(NPL) sites in the State addressed under the Superfund program. The fourth section discusses the
market at Federal Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) corrective action sites. The
U.S. Environmental Protectipn Agency (EPA) has not authorized the State of-Maryland to administer
corrective action; therefore, no discussion is included of sites subject to corrective action under the
authority of the State. The fifth section discusses the market at underground storage tank (UST) sites
managed by the State. The sixth section discusses the market at Federally owned sites in Maryland
that require remediation. The final section presents a discussion of other useful information about'the.
market for innovative technologies in Maryland.
Figures 4-1 and 4-2 present two
maps of the State of Maryland that
indicate the locations of the sites in
the State that are listed on the NPL
, and RCRA facilities in the State,
respectively1. The majority of the
NPL sites in Maryland are clustered
around the Chesapeake Bay, in the
eastern portion of the State. RCRA
facilities tend to be concentrated in
the Baltimore area, although there
are'many located in the corridor
between Baltimore and the District
of Columbia. Facilities are more or
less evenly distributed across the
remainder of the State.
Summary Information
Maryland offers a variety of opportunities to vendors
of innovative technologies at NPL sites and at
abandoned hazardous waste sites managed by the'
State. Listed on the Maryland priorities list for state-
managed cleanup are 14 sites that are predominantly
characterized by groundwater, contamination. EPA
manages 12 NPL sites where there are opportunities .
for innovative technology vendors. One additional
Department of Defense (DoD) site is a candidate for
the NPL; One RCRA facility in Maryland is under a
requirement:to conduct a corrective measure study
(CMS). Seven RCRA facilities in the State are under
a requirement to conduct a RCRA facility -
investigation (RFI). Data on USTs indicate that
1,000 tank sites in the State are in need of cleanup'.
There are 271 sites at 16 active DoD installations and
formerly used defense sites (PUDS) at which cleanup
activities are planned.
Figures 4-1 and 4-2 do not indicate the locations of all NPL sites or all RCRA facilities
located in Maryland. LandView II contains information from the Comprehensive
Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Information System (CERGLIS) on
NPL sites and other sites. It also contains information from the Biennial Reporting system
(BRS) on treatment, storage, and disposal facilities and major generators of hazardous waste.
4-1
-------
N
ft
Hagerstown
Source: Modified from LandView II, based
on data as of September 1994. Not to Scale
Figure 4-1
NPL Sites in Maryland
4-2
-------
N
It
Hagerstown
Baltimore
Source: Modified from LandView II, based
on data as of September 1994. Not to Scale
' Figure 4-2
RCRA Facilities in Maryland
4-3
-------
According to the Innovative Treatment Technologies: Annual Status Report (Seventh Edition), no
innovative technologies have*been used at Superfund NPL sites in Maryland.
4.1 The Maryland Hazardous Waste Management Program .
The Annotated Code of Maryland, Environment Articles, Title 7 Hazardous Material and Hazardous
Substances, Subtitle 2 Controlled Hazardous Substances 7-2-1 through 7-268 as amended,
establishes the State's Hazardous Substance Control Fund and enforcement authorities. Under that
authority, the State is authorized to regulate abandoned hazardous waste sites.
The Maryland Department of the Environment (MDE), Waste Management Administration,
Environmental Response & Restoration Program has two divisipns that are involved in the Superfund
process: the Site Assessment/State Superfund Division and the Federal and NPL Superfund Division.
The administration is responsible for overseeing all remediation work in the State.
Maryland's Hazardous Substance Control Fund Subaccount is funded by bond issuances and cost
recoveries. The balance as of November 1993 was approximately $14 million. There is no cap on
the fund. Fund monies can be used for removals, site investigation, emergency response, studies and
design, remedial actions, program administration, operation and maintenance, and state funds to
match Superfund contributions. .
MDE's Oil Control Program manages the UST program in Maryland. The program has an
administrative, permitting, support, and field staff of 40 persons, all located in the headquarters office
in Baltimore. Included, in the 40 staff members are 23 field inspectors.
4.2 The Market at Abandoned Sites Managed Under State Authorities
Maryland currently has approximately 470 abandoned hazardous waste cleanup sites that are not listed
on the NPL, including sites at which the State oversees cleanup by the responsible party or parties.
Of those 470 sites, 14 sites are on Maryland's priority list for cleanup. Conversations with
representatives of the State indicate that the majority of the State program's priority cleanups involve
groundwater contamination, because 70 to 75 percent of nonurban residents in the State use
groundwater. Table 4-1 lists the 14 priority sites in Maryland.
4-4
-------
Table4-l
Sites in Maryland Selected for Priority Cleanup
Site Name:!
> Bauer Farm ,
Baltimore Gas and Electric
(BGE) Bayard Street Station
Central Chemical .
Frederick Town Gas
Gibson-Homans
Hagerstown/Bradfording Road
Honey well/Alliant
^Reisters Property ,
Salisbury Town Gas
68th Street Dump ; ' ,
Thiokol'Corporation
W.L. Gore Left Bank
W.P. Ballard
* s
Westminster Coal Gas Plant
" . >. .'iVi. Site Address ' ', ' . ::/V:'::':
Off North Point Road and Bauers Farm Road
Baltimore, MD 21219 . .
Bayard and Bush Streets
Baltimore, 'MD 21201
Mitchell Road
Hagerstown, MD 21740
350 Church Street
Frederick, MD 21701
1101 Hanzlik Avenue
Baltimore, MD 21237
Cearfoss Pike and Bradfording Road
Hagerstown, MD 21740 .
2nd Street Ext. Greenwood Acres
Annapolis, MD 21404
Junction of Maryland Routes 30 and 140
Reisterstown, MD 21136
520 Commerce Street
Salisbury, MD 21801
68th Street and Pulaski Highway
Baltimore, MD 21237
Nottingham Road and Thiokol Road
Elkton, MD 21921 '
Triumph Industrial Park, 3 Blue Hair Road
P.O. Box 1130
Elkton, MD 21921-1130
10722 Tucker Street . >
Beltsville, MD 20705
George Street -...-
Westminster,- MD 21157
. .' ; '" Comments;; -X* :- ; ; ' '
Action by responsible party (RP)
to begin remediation by 12/95
Coal gasification plant in -
industrialized -area
Groundwater contamination
Groundwater contamination
RP action; operations and
maintenance (O&M) phase
planned
Groundwater pump-and-treat
system required
Groundwater contamination
RP action; O&M phase planned
Source (soil) removal completed; _
groundwater remediation to .
follow
Groundwater, soil, and surface
water contaminated with mercury
Many RPs; studies continuing
RPs sent notice of liability letters;
removal and remedial actions
planned
RP action for remedial .system ;
planned; soil and groundwater .
contaminated with
trichloroethylene (TCE)
Memorandum of Understanding
signed; remedial action planned
Source: Maryland Department of the Environment, Waste Management Administration '
Maryland officials indicate that, in general, at State Superfund sites, the State requires the use of
.technologies that treat groundwater contaminated by trichlordethylene (TCE), metals, volatile organic
compounds (VOC), and semivolatile organic compounds (SVOC). They also indicate that
technologies of immediate interest to representatives of the State include bioremediation, capping, and
in situ vitrification. .
4-5
-------
4.3 The Market at Abandoned Sites Managed Under the Federal Super-fund Program
EPA has listed 13 NPL sites in Maryland. Table 4-2 summarizes, information from the
Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Information System
(CERCLIS) database on the status of the NPL sites in Maryland, including the number of remedial
investigations and feasibility studies (RI/FS), remedial designs (RD), remedial actions (RA), and
removals that are planned, in progress, or complete. One additional site currently is being proposed
for listing on the NPL. Of the-13 sites, 8 sites were listed in the 1980s. Remediation activities are
substantially complete at one site. Table 4-3, found at the end of this section, lists 12 Federal NPL
sites in Maryland at which remedial action at 26 operable units has not yet begun. Those sites and
operable units are of greatest interest to vendors, as technologies may have been selected but vendors
of those technologies have not. .
Table 4-2
Number of Sites and Operable Units at Federal NPL Sites in Maryland
Phase of Activity
Remedial Investigations/Feasibility Studies
Planned
In Progress
. Complete (RD not started)
Remedial Designs
Planned
In Progress
Complete (RA not started) ,
Remedial Actions n
Planned
In Progress '
Complete
Removals . : - ,
Started
Complete
Number of Sites
4
6 ..
5
' " ' ' , '' "..'*:'~#:S
11
. : 2 '
. 2
. , ' ': V;,," -.'
12
2
' 5
' "-'',T"' '''-
8
8
Number of
Operable Units
1 ' .;.'"' !!:. ''
4 .
16
5
22
3 .
2
'':. ..[':$'>': ,'!tV ':''' '':.-;'.
26
2
6
. j. - . ,' --,' .,- ' ',' /'.,,:'> ' :> 4. , 'I t.,., ,,,l,l
';'..';';' ' ''.'=,"'"' ''..'" , -*v
17
16
Source: Data as of May 1995 from the EPA CERCLIS database; see Section 1.8 for a detailed description of the data sources.
4-6
-------
A review of the NPL site summaries indicates that most Maryland* NPL sites are contaminated with
metals and VOCs in both the soil and the groundwater. Pesticides, polychlorinated biphenyls (PCB),
and other chemical agents also are present at several sites. The presence of unexploded ordnance
(UXO) also is reported at one DoD NPL site. Minimal data on the volumes of contaminated soil or
groundwater to be treated appear hi Table 4-3. The sizes of the contaminated areas rarlge from 3
acres to as much as 13,000 acres. Figure 4-3 presents the distribution of sizes of Federal NPL sites
in Maryland. , . ' ,
Figure 4-3
NPL Site Size Distribution for the State of Maryland
<1-30 31-60 60-90 90-120 , > 120 Not
'-.- ''. Available
Acres
Several innovative technologies have been selected for use at the NPL sites. The technologies
selected include, but are not limited to, on-site chemical precipitation, air stripping, ultraviolet
oxidation, carbon adsorption, and steam stripping. Since data show that a remedial action is either
completed or underway at only seven sites, opportunities may be present at sites where construction is
not yet underway. . - .
4-7
-------
4.4 The Market at RCRA Corrective Action Sites
Although Maryland is authorized to issue RCRA Part B permits for hazardous waste facilities, the
State is not authorized to administer the corrective action program; however, through the RCRA -
Subtitle C Grant, Maryland'provides administrative support to EPA Region 3 in the management of
corrective action activities including preparation of draft corrective action permits and inspections.
Maryland does not have a State-mandated corrective action program for active hazardous waste
facilities.
Data from Resource Conservation and Recovery Information System (RCRIS) indicate that there are
41 RCRA facilities in the State: 10 land disposal units, 4 incinerators, and 34 storage and treatment
units2. Seven facilities are under a requirement to conduct a RCRA facility investigation (RFI). The
number of facilities with an RFI imposed is not a direct subset of the RCRA treatment, storage, and
disposal (TSD) facilities, instead, it is a subset of TSD facilities and hazardous waste generators.
While TSD facilities are statutorily required to address corrective action, EPA has discretionary
authority to impose corrective action on generators. As discussed in Section 1.2, these facilities may
provide either a long-term opportunity or near-term opportunity where no CMS is necessary to begin
corrective action or corrective activity begins hi accordance with the stabilization initiative.
*' ' *
4.5 The Market at UST Sites Managed by the State
The Maryland Department of Environment (MDE) Oil Control Program administers the State UST
program. Table 4-4 presents data on the number of USTs hi Maryland.
Table 4-4
Underground Storage Tank Corrective Action Measures
in Maryland as of Third Quarter FY95
Active
Tanks
19,992
"'":.-. .Tanks. -W
Closed £
13,070
.gir Confirmed
Releases
11,718^
Cleanups
Initiated
10,718
:.; ^i Cleanups ;'&': '.
.:; ;..'.';' Completed r,,-;|
4,294 1
A facility may. be included in more than one of these categories.
' 4-8 '
-------
There are approximately 19,992 active USTs in Maryland; the State ranks third in Region 3 in
number of active tanks. (Active tanks are defined as. tanks still in service.) Confirmed releases have
occurred at approximately 59 percent of the active USTs in the State. As of July 1995, 11,718
confirmed releases had been reported by Maryland to EPA's Office of Underground Storage Tanks
(OUST) of which 1,000 require cleanup. The numbers of USTs identified as marketing opportunities
for vendors of innovative technologies will change rapidly because, of the combination of rapid
increases in the number of confirmed releases and continuing site closures. In national studies of
USTs performed by EPA in 1991 and 1992, it was found that the majority, or about 87 percent, of
tanks are used to manage gasoline or diesel fuel, kerosene, and heating oil. Of the remaining USTs,
13 percent manage other materials and wastes, such as used oil (4 percent), hazardous material (2
percent), and other material (5 percent) or are empty (2 percent). The majority of the contamination
problems are related to the contamination of soils and groundwater with petroleum products that
contain VOCs and SVOCs (EPA 1992a, 1992b). *
4.6 The Market at Federal Facility Sites in Maryland
' f ' '
As is the case with all of the other states in Region 3, there are no Department of Energy (DOE)
facilities in the State where remedial actions are planned. There is one site owned by the U.S.
Department of Agriculture (USDA) in Maryland, the Beltsville Agricultural Research Center, which
is listed on the NPL. No data were available that indicate the level of funding for the site. Other
information about the site is presented in Table 4-3, found at the end of this section.
There are also 16 active Department of Defense (DoD) installations and formerly used defense sites
(FUDS) in Maryland, At the 16 active DoD installations and FUDS, there are 271 sites at which
remediation currently is planned. The eventual number of sites at those installations that require
remediation may exceed that figure because DoD has not completed its evaluation -of all the sites.
The Defense Environmental Restoration Program Annual Report to Congress for Fiscal Year 1994.
(DERP report) indicates that a total of approximately $2 billion in funding is estimated to be needed
through 2025 in all phases of cleanup at the 16 installations in Maryland. The bulk of the funds ($1.6
billion) is allocated to Aberdeen Proving Ground (Edgewood-Area and Michaelsville Landfill, which
are listed on the NPL), .with the smallest amount of funds ($1.6 million) allocated to the Defense
National Stockpile Center (DNSG) Curtis Bay.
4-9
-------
The majority of the contaminants at the sites at DoD installations for which remediation currently is
planned fall into four broad categories: petroleum, oil, and lubricants (POL); VOCs; metals; and
waste related to ordnance, specifically, white phosphorus, and UXO. No data were available oh the
volumes of soil and groundwater to be treated. Table 4-5 presents information on the individual
, .' ' ' ' -.."/..,' ~
installations in the State and the sites subject to remediation at those installations. Staff at each
installation determine the individual sites at which they plan to perform remedial actions. Cleanup
already may be underway at other sites; those sites are not included in the table because it is unlikely
that they will afford near-term opportunities for vendors of innovative technologies. Of the
installations included in the table, Aberdeen Proving Ground (Edgewood Area and Michaelsville
Landfill) and Naval Air Station Patuxent River are listed on the NPL. The Naval Surface Warfare ,
Center (NSWC) Indian Head is proposed for the NPL.
table 4-5
DoD Installations and Sites in Maryland at Which Cleanup is Planned3
Name, Address,
and Outyear Funding ($000)
Aberdeen Proving Ground
21005-5001
Outyear Funding FY95-2Q10
SU627.078
Blossom Point Field Test Facility
Outyear Funding FY95-2005
54,702
Fort Detrick
21702-5000
Ouryear Funding FY95-2013
$28,290
Fort George G. Meade
20755-5000 '
Outyear Funding FY95-2010
535,302
Bethesda NAVMEDCOM
NATCAPREG
Ouryear Funding FY95-2009
59,396 *
NSWC Carderock
Outyear Funding FY95-2010
$21,887
NSWC Indian Head
20640-5035
Outyear Funding FY95-2007
525,691
Federal Facility
Identification
Number
MD321002135500
MD321002100200
MD321002026700
MD321002056700
*w
MD3 17002468700.
MD3 17002468600
MD3 17002468400
Codesb
A,N
. A
A
A
A
A
A, P
Number of Sites at
Which Cleanup
is Planned
191
0
0
2
2
7 , ' -
22
4-10
-------
Table 4-5 (continued)
DoD Installations and Sites in Maryland at Which Cleanup is Planned3
-.^\". ' Name, Address, , --.'..-'
and Outyear Funding ($000)
Naval Air Station Patuxent River
20670-5409
Outyear Funding FY95-2005
$40,614 . ; '
Naval Training Center Bainbridge
Outyear Funding FY95-2004
$4,835
Solomons Annex NAVRECCEN
P.O. Box.147
Solomons 20688-0147
Outyear Funding FY95-2007 '
$6,161
U.S. Naval Academy
Annapolis 21402-5054
Outyear Funding FY95-2010
$27,701
NSWC White Oak
Outyear Funding FY95-2006
$11,284 :
Andrews Air Force Base
Washington, DC 20331-5000
Outyear Funding FY95-2025 . .
: $80,561 . .
Martin State Air National Guard.
Baltimore 21220-2899
Outyear Funding FY95-TBD
, $10,850
DNSC Curtis Bay
Curtis Bay 21226-1797
Outyear- Funding FY95-1997
$1,598
Nike BA-09 (Fork)
Outyear Funding FY95-2008
$2,000
AH Other Installations
$35,744
Federal Facility
Identification
Number-"
MD3 17002453600
/
MD3 17002256200
MD317002753100
.MD3 17002260200
MD3 17002344400
MD357182400000
MD357282590100
MD397 152020200
MD39799F137400
-
Codesb
A,N
A
~ .A
A ".
. -A '
- A. ,
' -.A '-
:. . A ^
F ,
" -
Number of Sites at
Which Cleanup
. is Planned
10 .
2 .
' , 2 ' :
.' -.3
' 7
10
9
1
3 '
' ' . " '"'''
Source: Defense Environmental Restoration Program Annual Report to Congress for Fiscal Year 1994 '
a Includes installations with funding for cleanup of more than $1 million and with three or more active sites.
b Codes: .' '. - .. ' ' ' :. .' " .,
A =-The installation is currently active and covered by-Defense Environmental Restoration Account (DERA) funds.
F = The-installation is no longer active and is managed by the FUDS Branch. '
l4 = The site is listed on the final National Priorities List. . '
P = The site is proposed for listing on the National Priorities List. ' -
4-11 ,
-------
4.7 Further Market Information for Maryland .
The Maryland Department of General Services provides initiation and administration for contracting.
There are no bidders lists for engineering or construction,work. Vendors can reach the Department
of General Services by calling (410) 225-4997.
Contracts are advertised in approximately 30 trade publications in the State and in the Maryland
Register Contract Weekly. To subscribe to the publication, vendors can call (410) 974-2486.
A vendor that wishes to obtain information about sites in Maryland that are managed by EPA may
write to: ' '
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Region 3 .
841 Chestnut Building
Philadelphia, PA 19107
For information on RCRA facilities, the envelope should be marked to the attention of the Freedom
of Information Act Officer, Office of RCRA Programs. For information on Comprehensive
Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA) facilities, the envelope should
be marked to the attention of the Freedom of Information Act Officer, Office of Superfund Programs.
. f -
The requestor will be billed for the information, depe'nding on the volume of information.
In addition, the MDE, Waste Management Administration, Oil Control Program provides two lists to
the public. The cost as of June 1995 for each list appears in parentheses below. The Oil Control
Program has available a list of UST facilities ($25,00 per county'or $500 for the entire State) and a
list of active recovery sites ($100). The UST list includes the facility identification number; the
name, address, city, county, and ZIP code of the site; the current age of the tank; its capacity; the
status of the tank; and the substance it contains. The list of active recovery sites includes the name
and address of the site, the type of recovery, and the site's MDE number. The office can be
contacted at and .checks made payable to:
Maryland Oil Fund
Fiscal Services Division
2500 Broening Highway
Baltimore, MD 21224
(410)631-3433
(410) 631-3092 (facsimile)
4-12
-------
Table 4-3
NPL Sites in Maryland at Which Marketing Opportunities Exist3
Operable Unit
Number Name' (Lead)
RA Planned Start
Dateb . -. .
RI/FS
'Completed
Media
Volume
Contaminants
Technology
SITE NAME: ABERDEEN PROVING ORQUNP (EDGEWOOD AREA) i r . EPA ID: MD22iOQ20Q36 . "ADDRESS: OFF RTE 40; ABERDEEN, MD 21(X>i^ -
NPLSTATUS: ." Final. .".. ; ' CE^X^vM"^: '? ^ V?'°:' \ "'.'':'".' .'? : :>;; :; SIZE:; ..; . 13,000 Acre? V f. i TYPE: 4 Chemical Agent Munitions; Ordnance Testing and Maintenance
01 GROUND WATER (FF)
02 CANAL CREEK . . '
.. (GROUNpWATER) (FF)
'03 CANAL CREEK (OTHER) (FF)
. 04 O-F1ELD (SOURCE) ' (FF)
06 0-FJELD (OTHER) (FF)
-07 J-FIELD (SOURCE) (FF)
; . 08 J-FIELD (GROUNDWATER) (FF)
09 CARROLL ISLAND (FF)
10 GRACES QUARTERS (FF)
; 11 OTHER AREAS (FF)
' S . ' i r
6/30/95
3/31/97
9/30/95
9/30/95
12/31/97
3/31/95
9/3Q/98
12/31/96
3/31/96
9/30/97 .
Y .
. N
Y.
N .
N
N.
' - N , -''
, . N
"N ,-
- N
AI;SO
GW r
AI; DB; MS; SD;
SO;ST;SW
AI; DB; LW
GW; MS; SD; SO;
SW .
AI;DB;MS;SD;
SO;SW
GW-
AI; DB; GW; MS;
SD; SO; SW
AI; DB; GW; -MS; ,
SD; SO; SW
AI;DB;GW;LW;
MS;RC;SD;SL;
SO; ST; SW
NA
NA
700 Acres
NA
NA " _
/
NA
NA '
. NA
: : :NA
NA
METALS;
PHOSPHORUS; VOCs
METALS;
PHOSPHORUS; VOCs
METALS;
PHOSPHORUS; VOCs ,
CHEMICAL AGENTS;
UXO .
CHEMICAL AGENTS
UXO .
NA
NA
METALS; .
PHOSPHORUS;- VOCs;
UXO .
.NA- - ' -'.
On-Site Chemical Precipitation; Air Stripping;
Inoxidation; Carbon Adsorption
NA , ' ' .
Landfill Cap
Permeable Cap ,
' NA '
' ' '-'' . NA ' ...
'.'. NA, ",
NA
NA
NA' "..".
In general, studies are scheduled to continue throughout the site .until 2000; many RAs.are scheduled for completion in 1995. - - . . ".
a Dataasof May 1995 from EPA CERCLIS and RRLAI Databases. See Section 1.8 far a detailed description of these data sources.
b Some RA planned start dates have passed; the actual RA start date had not been recorded as of March 1995. This circumstance may have occurred because (1) the project is
running later than'planned or (2).the actual RA start date was recorded after the data were extracted.
Abbreviations: ... . , . ...... . :_..-
AI
DB
DK
EP
ES-
Air
Debris =
Unknown
EPA In-House
Entire Site
F
FE
FF
GW
LW
EPA Fund-Financed
Federal Enforcement
Federal Facilities
Groundwater
Liquid Waste
MR
MS
NA
NO
OT
Mixed Funding Federal/RP .
Man-made Structures
Not Available
: No Media
Other
PS
RA
RC
RP
S
PRP Response Under State
Remedial Actions
RCRA Hazardous Waste .
Responsible Patty
State, Fund-Financed
SD
SI
SL
SO
SR
Sediment.
Single Intake
Sludge
Soil .''
PRP Lead Under State
ST
-SW
UXO
VOCs
Solid Waste
Surface Water
Unexploded Ordnance
Volatile Organic "
Compounds
4-13
-------
Table 4-3 (continued)
NPL Sites In Maryland at Which Marketing Opportunities Exist*
Operable Unit
Number Name (Lead)
RA Planned Start
Dateb
RI/FS
Completed
Media
Volum« ' .
Contaminants
Technology
SITE NAME: ABERDEEN PROVING GROUND (MICHAELSVILLE LANDFILL) EPA ID: MD32I0021355 ADDRESS: OFF RTE 40; ABERDEEN PROVING GROUND, MD 21005
NPL STATUS: Final SIZE: 20 Acres TYPE; Ordnance Testing ami Maintenance; Landfill; Disposal Area;
.-."' - , ; " Fin'ng Ranges; Impact Areas; Fire Training Area; Laboratories
02 LANDFILL (GROUNDWATER) (FF)
03 PHILLIPS FIELD LF (FF)
04- WHITE PHOS. AREA
UNDERWATER MUNICIPAL ' .
BURIAL SITE . (FF)
05 FIRE TRAINING AREA (FF)
06 OTHER AREAS (NON-NPL) ' (FF)
6/30/97
9/30/98
In 1996, a review
of new
technologies to
study suspected
contamination will
be performed. '
3/31/97
6/30/98
N "
N
Y
N
N
GW
. DB; GW; ST
SO; SW .
GW;SL;SO
AI;DB;GW;SD;
SO; SW.
NA
- NA
NA
NA
NA
METALS;
PHOSPHORUS; VOCs
PCBs; PESTICIDES;
VOCs
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA - - .
NA
NA
Investigation began in 1991 and is expected to be completed in early 2002. N- . ' . .*-
SITENAME: . : BELTSV1LLE AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH (USDA) . v; =; : . = ; EPA ID: rMD0120508940 . .-." ; ADDRESS: BUILDINGS 1321& 204 BARL; BELTSVILLE, MD 20705
NPL STATUS: .. Fi'nal "--"""': "- ':- 'S , ' -. .."' ';: ' ' '; -;;":' "- " .' ! SIZE: : .4 Acres .*--.>':- :-"- : .TYPE: ^^STE^l^^-;->;=v.:1^;:; ^^;; ;.^:- - ^x^v; '- -y:
01. FDA VET MED.
BIODEGRADABLE L.F. (FF)
6/30/98
N'
GW; SD; SO; SW
NA
PAHs; PESTICIDES;
PCBs; METALS; VOCs
NA "
SITENAME: BUSH VALLEY LANDFILL EPA ID: MDD9"80504195 ADDRESS: BUSH RD FOB 246; AB1NGDON, MD 21009 ,
NPL STATUS:' ' Final .>::V - ; . . , '.- '----;<:. '-"-;-. .: : SIZE: .-'I. 29 Acres -:., ':'..- . ; TYPE: ;- Reftse .Sysiems~Co-disposai Landfill ::.: ;S :! ,:.:p.?i -: .:
. of . - (RP/F)| , -5/31/98
N
AI;DB;GW;SD; 1 ' NA
SO;ST;SW |
VOCs; METALS f. NA '--..-
1 ' *
SITENAME: KANE & LOMBARD STREET DRUMS EPA ID: MDD980923783 ADDRESS: KANE 4 LOMBARD STS; BALTIMORE, MD:i 1224 :
NPL STATUS: Final _ , . - ." SIZE: 8 Acres TYPE;. Abandoned - No Use .-.-... '"''.
02 . GROUNDWATER . (S/FE/RP)
11/30/99
Y
GW;SD|;SW
NA
VOCs; METALS
NA .''
a Data as of May 1995 from EPA CERCLIS and RELAI Databases. See Section 1.8 for a detailed description of these data sources.
b Some RA planned start dates have passed; the actual RA start date had not been recorded as 'of March 1995. This circumstance may have occurred because (1) the project is
running later than planned or (2) the. actual RA start date was recorded after the data were extracted. . -
Abbreviations: ' . -
AI
DB
DK
EP
ES
Air
Debris
Unknown
EPA ln-House
Entire Site
F '
FE
FF'
GW
LW
EPA Fund-Financed
Federal Enforcement
Federal Facilities
Groundwater
Liquid Waste
MR
MS
NA
NO
OT
Mixed.Funding Federal/RP
Man-made Structures
'Not Available
No Media
Other
i-i ....n. __i in B.iMnaaa^
PS
RA
RC
RP
S-
BtBHBHlBBn
PRP Response Under State
Remedial Actions
RCRA Hazardous Waste
Responsible Party
State, Fund-Financed
BI_l^^___.^^__l^^_^^a_l^^^_HMH_H^_l
SD
SI
SL
SO
, SR
^^^iMM
Sediment
Single Intake
Sludge
Soil
PRP Lead Under State
^^^^^^^^^^^^B^^^MBM^H
ST
SW
UXO
VOCs
^^^^ ^_
Solid Waste
Surface Water
Unexploded Ordnance
Volatile Organic
Compounds "
^^^^^^^^i^B
-------
NPL Sites In. Maryland at Which Marketing Opportunities Exist3
Operable Unit ~_
' Number Name . (Lead)
SITE NAME: LIMESTONE ROAD
NPL STATUS: Final
02 GROUNDWATER/STREAMS/
SEDIMENTS (F/FE/RP)
SITE NAME": ORDNANCE PRODUCTS, INC.
NPL STATUS: Proposed
01 NA ' . (RP/EE)
RA Planned Start
= - Dateb
RI/FS
Completed
Media .
Volume
-x
Contaminants
Technology
EPA ID: MDD9.80691588 ADDRESS: LIMESTONE RD OFF RTE 51; CUMBERLAND, MD
SIZE: 35 Acres 21502
TYPE: Abandoned- No Use; Reftise Systems-Co-disposal Landfill
3/18/98
Y
GW; SD; SW I NA'
NA
NA
' EPA ID: MDD982364341 ADDRESS: MECHANICS VALLEY ROAD; NORTHEAST, MD 21901
SIZE: 55 Acres TYPE: 'NA
9/14/00
-N
GW; SO; SW
NA ^ METALS; VOCs | NA
^SITONAME: PATUXENT RIVER NAVAL AIRSTATION - ;;' EPA ID: MD7170024536 ADDRES&'BUTT RIFLE RANGE LANDFILL; PATUXENT, MD. 20670
NPL STATUS: Final . . SIZE: NA TYPE: ; DISPOSAL PITS -
01 BUTT RIFLE LANDFILL (FF)
SITE NAME! SAND, GRAVEL & STONE
NPL STATUS: Final
03 NA (RP)
04 NA (RP)
12/31/98
N
SO;SW
16.5 Acres
PESTICIDES; OT
NA
EPA ID: MDD980705164 ADDRESS: RTE 40; ELKTON, MD 21921
SIZE: 3 Acres TYPE: Abandoned - No Use , '
6/30/95
. 12/31/94
N
N
NA
NA -
NA
' NA
NA
NA
Pump and Treatment; Alternate Water Supply
SITENAME: SOUTHERN MARYLAND WOOD TREATING ~ EPA ID: , MDD980704852 . ADDRESS: Sf ATE RT 235; HOLLYWOOD, MD i 20686
NPL STATUS: Final _ SIZE: ?::.;:25 Acres : TYPE: I; Abandoned VNo Use; A^pd Treatment Operations ;:/ : :
02 SOIL/GROUND WATER (F)
' - ' "
SITENAME: SPECTRON, INC
NPLSTATUS: Final . ,: ";:, - ' ... '. .-, :. ',-:V:;
12/31/96
N
GW; MS; SD; SO;
SW
NA
CREOSOTES; PCP;
VOCs; PAHs; DNAPL
NA
EPAID: MDD000218008 ' ADDRESS: 111 PROVIDENCE RD; ELKTON, MD 21921
-,::,-,;:,/-- '" '.^>~ '...;. '' SIZE:. 8 Acres -._: ' - .-TYPE:,- :. NA" ' '. ; . ' ;.- ' ," '. '.......' ' . :'-'...'' ; :\_ .... .
01 SPECTRON 00 CONTINUED , (RP/FE)'{ 3/26/01 [.' N
SW;SO . T NA
VOCs ' | NA
a Data as of May 1995.from EPA CERCLIS and RELAI Databases. See Section 1.8 for" a detailed description of these data sources. : .
b Some RA planned start dates have passed; the actual RA start date had not been recorded as of March 1995. This circumstance rtay have occurred because (1) the project is
running later than planned or (2) the actual RA start date was recorded after the data were extracted. . - . '
Abbreviations: " " '. . ' - .
Al .
DB
DK
EP
ES
Air
Debris
Unknown
' EPA In-House
Entire Site
F
FE..
FF
GW
LW
EPA Fund-Financed
Federal Enforcement
Federal Facilities
Groundwater
Liquid Waste
MR
MS
NA
NO
OT
Mixed Funding Federal/RP
Man-made Structures
Not Available
No Media ..-";
Other: . : .
PS
,RA
RC
RP
S
PRP Response Under State
Remedial Actions
RCRA Hazardous Waste
Responsible Party
State, Fund-Financed
SD
SI
SL
SO
SR
- i
Sediment
Single Intake
Sludge
Soil
PRP Lead Under State
ST
- SW
UXO-
VOCs
Solid Waste
Surface Water
Unexploded Ordnance .
Volatile Organic .
Compounds
4-15
-------
Table 4-3 (continued)
NPL Sites in Maryland at Which Marketing Opportunities Exist9
Operable Unit
Number "Name (Lead)
RA Planned Start
Dateb
RI/FS
Completed
, Media
Volume '
Contaminants
Technology
SITE NAME: WOODLAWN COUNTY LANDFILL ' EPA ID: MDD980504344 ADDRESS: FIRE TOWER & WAIBEL- RDS.; WOODLAWN, MD 21904
NPL STATUS: Final SIZE: 37 Acres TYPE; Abandoned -No Use; Refuse Systems-Co-disposal Landfill
01 ENTIRE SITE (RP/FE)
2/10/97
Y
AI; GW; SD; SL;
SO; ST; SW
400 cubic yards
METALS; PESTICIDES/
HERBICIDES; YOCs
Monitoring; Air Stripping Technologies;
Disposal of Residual; Precipitation; Leachate
Trealmcnt; Steam Stripping,; Surface Capping
Only; Off-Site Treatment
a Data-as of May 1995 from EPA CERCLIS and RELAI Databases See Section 1.8 for a detailed description of these data sources.
b Some RA planned start dates have passed; the actual RA stan date had not been recorded as of March 1995. This circumstance may have occurred because (1) the project is
running later than planned or (2) the actual RA start dale was recorded after the data were extracted. . .
Abbreviations:
AI
DB
DK
EP
ES
-Air
Debris
Unknown
EPA In-House
. Entire Site
F
FE
FF
GW
LW
EPA Fund-Financed
Federal Enforcement
Federal Facilities
Groundwater
Liquid Waste
MR
MS
NA
NO
QT
Mixed Funding Federal/RP
Man-made Structures
Not Available .
No Media
Oilier .
PS
RA
RC
RP
s
HmH^Ba
PRP Response Under Slate
Remedial Actions
RCRA Hazardous Waste
Responsible Party
State, Fund-Financed
SD
SI.
SL
SO
SR
^^H
Sediment
Single Intake -
Sludge
Soil
PRP Lead Understate
^^^^^MBIBH
ST
SW
UXO.
VOCs
______
Solid Waste
Surface Water
Unexploded Ordnance
Volatile Organic
Compounds
_|^B^H_^H^^__
-------
5.0 DEMAND FOR REMEDIATION OF SITES IN PENNSYLVANIA
This section is organized in seven sections. The first section describes the Pennsylvania hazardous
waste management program. The next section discusses sites managed by the State: The third and
fourth sections discuss the market at sites addressed by the Federal Superfund Program and Federal
Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) corrective'action sites respectively. The U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has not authorized Pennsylvania to administer corrective
action; therefore, no discussion is included of sites subject to corrective action under the authority pf
the State. The fifth section discusses the market at underground storage tank (UST) sites managed by
the State. The sixth section reviews the market at Department of Defense (DoD) sites in
Pennsylvania. The final section of the chapter presents a tjrief discussion of other useful information
about doing business at sites in Pennsylvania. '
Figures 5-1 and 5-2 presents two
maps of Pennsylvania that indicate
the locations of the sites in the State
that are listed on the NPL and
RCRA facilities in the'State,
respectively1. NPL sites in
Pennsylvania, are concentrated in the
eastern part of the State, with, the
majority found hi the southeast, in
the area of Philadelphia. While
RCRA facilities are found
throughout the State, there-are two.
major concentrations in the areas'
around Philadelphia and Pittsburgh.
Summary Information
The number of .sites and operable units in the State
that require remediation indicates that Pennsylvania
presents the greatest marketing opportunity in the
Middle-Atlantic region for vendors of innovative
technologies. The Pennsylvania Priority List, which
includes abandoned sites to be remediated under the
State cleanup program, lists 11 sites, each of which
requires remediation that is expected to cost more
than $2 million or take more than one year to
complete. EPA manages 77 Superfund National
Priorities List (NPL) sites where there are
opportunities for innovative technology vendors. Five
of the State's RGRA facilities are under a requirement
to conduct a corrective measure study (CMS).
Twenty-seven of the State's RCRA facilities are under
a requirement to conduct a RCRA facility
investigation (RFI). DataronUSTs indicate that 1,336
tank_sites in the State are in need of cleanup. There
are 154 sites at 28 active D6D installations and ,
formerly used defense sites (FUDS) at which cleanup
activities are planned. >;.
1 Figures 5-1 and 5-2 do not indicate the locations of all NPL sites or all RCRA sites located in
Pennsylvania. LandView II contains information from the Comprehensive Environmental
Response, Compensation, and Liability Information System (CERCLIS) on NPL sites and
other sites. It also contains information from the Biennial Reporting System (BRS) on
treatment, storage, and disposal facilities and major generators of hazardous waste.
5-1
-------
N
It
Eriei
* Scranton
Pittsburgh
Harrisbiirg
Bethlehem
Philadelphia
Source: Modified from LandView II, based ,
on data as of September 1994. Not to Scale
Figure 5-1
NPL Sites in Pennsylvania
5-2
-------
N
IT
Scranton
* . *'
«: m
' m " 'Harrisburg ' -.". I . " '. 4lB
. -
- -.
. Philadelphia
Source: Modified from LandView II, based
on data as of September 1994. Not to Scale
Figure 5-2
RCRA Facilities in Pennsylvania
5-3
-------
Some use of innovative technologies has occurred in Pennsylvania. The technologies applied at,
Superfund sites, according to the Innovative Treatment Technologies: Annual Status Report (Seventh
Edition), are ex situ bioremediation, soil vapor extraction, thermal desorption, and chemical
treatment. ' : _
5.1 The Pennsylvania Hazardous Waste Management Program
The Pennsylvania Department, of Environmental Protection (PADEP) is responsible for administering
the State's regulations governing abandoned waste sites. PADEP has more than 3,800. employees and
numerous regional and district offices throughout the State. The Hazardous Sites Cleanup Program
has 127 employees.' . -
The Hazardous Sites Cleanup Act'(HSCA) of 1988 (Act 1988-108, 35 P.S. § 6020.101 et seq.)
established a state fund and provides for administrative and judicial enforcement authority, cleanup
procedures, a priority list, replacement of water supplies, restrictions' on transfer of property, legal
action by citizens, and public participation. The State Superfund program, managed by PADEP's
Bureau of Waste Management, supports field staff in administering statewide programs for hazardous,
municipal, and residual solid waste management, including cleanup of hazardous waste sites. The
State fund provides 100 percent of the administrative costs of PADEP. The management organization
of the program consists of a PADEP Headquarters organization located at the central offices in .
Hanisburg, six regional field operations offices, and six mining district offices. The Bureau of Waste
Management in the Air and Waste Management Office is responsible for making policy and managing
remediation contracts. The regional field operations offices, listed in Section 5.7, implement the
technical program and provide oversight of contractors (PADEP 1995k; EPA 1993a).
According to EPA's An Analysis of State Super/and Programs: 50-State Study, 1993 Update, the
Hazardous Sites Cleanup Fund is used to fund all phases of site cleanup except for operation and
maintenance. The fund is used for a broad range of activities that go beyond the scope of a typical
site cleanup program, including grants for recycling programs, grants or loans provided to
municipalities as compensation for citing a hazardous waste facility, and loans for facilitating cleanups
by private parties. The fund had a balance of $60.5 million at the end of fiscal year (FY) 1993.
Additions to the fund during FY93 totaled $45.58 million. A capital stock and franchise tax
generated S34.8 million. Hazardous waste transportation and management fees provided $2.6 million
to the fund. Minor sources of monies for the fund were interest, penalties, and cost recoveries.
5-4
-------
' Expenditures from the fund in FY93 totaled $45,000 for the NPL portion of the program and $11.88
million for the non-NPL portion. Obligations from the fund in FY93 were $900,000 for the 'NPL
- portion and $21.5,7 million for the non-NPL portion. Fund monies may be used for site
investigations, studies and design, removals, remedial actions, program admihistratipn, emergency
response, compensation of victims, and restoration of natural resources, as well as to provide funds to
match Federal Superfund dollars for sites governed by the Comprehensive Environmental Response,.
Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA). The Pennsylvania Priority List includes sites that
PADEP has determined to require remediation under HSCA. A description of those sites is included
in Section 5.2 below. , ., V
According to EPA's 1993 50-State Study, HSCA provides that, until the State promulgates its own
standards, the Federal Superfund Amendments and Reauthprization Act (SARA) Section 121
regarding cleanup standards applies. Maximum contaminant levels (MCL) and EPA guidelines are
used when appropriate. PADEP may apply more stringent standards, on a easerby-case basis,
including standards based on background levels, or it may waive or modify otherwise applicable.
requirements under HSCA Section 504..
The new Land Recycling Program was created in 1995 to encourage the cleanup and redevelopment
of old industrial sites. The Land Recycling Program was created by legislation Act 2, 3 and 4 --
that Governor Tom Ridge signed into law May 19, 1995. Act 2 is the primary law of the land ,
recycling program and establishes .a realistic framework for setting cleanup standards, provides special
incentives for developing abandoned sites, releases responsible parties from liability when cleanup
1 standards are met, sets deadlines for PADEP actions and provides funding for environmental studies,, :
and cleanups. This new program will encourage the recycling of old industrial sites but, because the
program is relatively new, there are no data on the number of sites to be cleaned up under this
program at this time. "
Act 32, the Storage Tank and Spill Prevention Act, was passed in 1989 and amended on ;.-
April 18, 1992, to authorize Pennsylvania to regulate both aboveground and underground storage
tanks (AST and UST, respectively), including heating oil tanks. The act gives PADEP. the authority
- to: ''' '.'.. .'. '-. ' ''...-;'''
Provide for certification of installers and inspectors .
5-5
-------
/ *
Require the-registration of tanks
Develop standards for both ASTs and USTs
Develop regulations governing financial responsibility
Establish the UST Indemnification Fund, which is an insurance fund 'administered by
the State Department of Insurance, to provide for .cleanups
The leaking underground storage tank (LUST) program is managed by the Bureau of Waste
Management's Division of Land Recycling and Remediation, located in PADEP's central office in
Harrisburg and in the six regional offices throughout the State. The central office develops statewide
policies, regulations, and procedures, while the regional offices implement the program. There are
approximately 120 staff working in the LUST program!
The facilities and sites managed under the programs identified above are discussed in the following
subsections.
5.2 The Market at Abandoned Sites Managed Under State Authorities
, * '
As of June 1995, 11 sites are listed on the Pennsylvania Priority List for Remedial Response,
published in the Pennsylvania Bulletin. The sites did not receive scores above 28.5 when evaluated
by the Federal Superfund's Hazard Ranking System (HRS). They, therefore, are not listed on the
NPL but have been determined by PADEP to require remediation. In addition, the sites are not;
subject to corrective action.under RCRA.
*
Remedial response sites gbvemed by provisions of HSCA are sites at which the response is expected
to cost more than $2 million or'take more than one year to complete. At some of the remedial sites,
an interim response may be underway, or may.have been completed, to secure or stabilize the site,
pending the final remedial response. There also are eight sites governed by HSCA at which, an
interim response currently is being conducted. Interim responses are responses that are expected to
cost less than $2 million and usually are completed within two months. In some cases, the interim
response under HSCA is followed by a remedial response or a second interim response,' both under
"HSCA, or a response action that is governed not by HSCA but by other legal authorities. In most
cases, the interim response under HSCA is the only response implemented at the site. Finally, there
are seven "other HSCA sites" for which PADEP has determined that a response under HSCA may be
5-6
-------
necessary, and such a response is being planned or a site investigation is being conducted under
HSCA. Table 5-1 presents the nanies and locations of the sites classified by PADEP under remedial
response, or active interim response, or other categories of sites governed by HSCA. The reader
should note that due to the rapid nature of investigation and cleanup work at active interim response
and other sites, the information included in the table may change quickly.
Table5-l
Sites Subject to the Pennsylvania Hazardous Sites Cleanup Act
;%,'-:.;;:;. .' '^slto^acK^''^^'' "'.;' '
Municipality : :
'!.:- '_' , County"-; .;. .";/,'
HSCA Remedial Response Sites - - .: ?;:.-" '. '; : ' /'.. .-' ' OS^;.:-."-: y:'V''~.'- .. ./',
Crown Industries ,
Delta Chemicals
Dupont/Newcastle , ,
Easterly. Sewage Treatment Plant
F.E. Cooper Lumber
U.K. Porter Dump Site . .
Industrial Solvents and Chemical
J.C. Cleaners
Municipal and Industrial Disposal
Company ;
Presque Isle Chemical .
Shaler/JTC
. Lackawaxen Township
North Buffalo Township
New Castle
Logan Township
Broad Top Township
Hopewell Township
Newberry Township
Gettysburg
Elizabeth Township
Washington Township
Bruin
Pike
Armstrong .
Lawrence ' . . .
Blair
Bedford . ~
Beaver
York .--.',
Adams -
Allegheny
Erie
Butler
.: . ::".:,.....,....,,>,.:.. ,;, ; ',.,- ' . ,..:.. , .:,.: :,.,-' : '. ..:. '. "';'"., . . / '
HSCA Active Interim Response Sites .
Blumenthal Battery
Coudersport PCE
Delta Truck Body Company, Inc.
, Gray Chemical .
National Precision Casting
Quality Container Corp.
Sellersville Landfill
Zieglersville TCE
Waynesboro '
Coudersport
Perry Township
Roulette
East Whiteland Township
Philadelphia ' | '
Sellersville Borough
Lower Frederick Township
Franklin '!'.'
Potter
Berks .
Potter
Chester
Philadelphia
Bucks
Montgomfery ,
5-7
-------
. Table 5-1 (continued)
Sites Subject to the Pennsylvania Hazardous Sites Cleanup Act
Other HSCA Sites '..'': . ,..:.; :.x \. '.'.;, ...''''- .£*...../...
Economy Borough Site*
Filmore Site
Hanover Scrap Quarry
Leighton Industries
Little Rio Grande Creek Site
Oliver Landfill*
Reclamation Resources, Inc.
Economy Borough
Mill Creek Township
Conewago Township
Phoenixville
Hulmeville Borough
Waterford Township
Hatfield Township
Beaver-
Erie
Adams
Chester
Bucks
Erie
Montgomery
Source: Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection '.'.-
* Potentially Responsible Patty (PRPHead Cleanup
Data provided by PADEP listed in Table 5-2 indicate that groundwater and soil are contaminated at
most remedial response sites governed by HSCA. Surface water at many sites is contaminated.
Typical contaminants include polychlorinated biphenyls (PCB), dioxin, and metals. Table 5-2
presents the names of remedial response sites governed by HSCA at which remedial activities have
not yet begun, identifies the media contaminated and the contaminants present at those sites, and
describes the status of each site. Table 5-3 provides information on two of the "other sites" governed
by HSCA at which remedial activities may be required. Limited information was available on other
sites, so the information in the table is not all-inclusive.
Table 5-2
Pennsylvania HSCA Remedial Response Sites
at Which Remediation Activities Have Not Yet Started
Site Name
Crown Industries (salvage
operation for metals)
Rheingold Boulevard
Lackawaxen, PA 18457
Pike County
Delta Chemicals (former
solvent recycling facility)
Worthington Road and
Beany Mills Road
North Buffalo, PA 16262
Armstrong County
EPABD
PAD981034846
PAD088915822
Size
Not
Available
Not
Available
, Media
Groundwater,
soil, surface
water,
sediments
Surface water,
groundwater,
soil
Contaminants <
PCBs, benzene, phenols,
dioxin, polyaromatic
hydrocarbons (PAH), lead,
antimony, cadmium,,
copper, zinc
Cadmium, benzene,
perchloroethylene (PCE),
trichloroethylene (TCE),
chloroform, toluene,
methylene chloride, and
other organic compounds
'"':.;;. . " Status.':, "'"''.;'
Phase I remedial response
conducted to remove
scrap. Phase II remedial
response to address .source
reduction currently under
evaluation
Interim response actions
conducted, .current
negotiations by PADEP
with PRPs to implement a
selected remedy to address
soil and groundwater
contamination
5-8
-------
Table 5-2 (continued)
Pennsylvania HSCA Remedial Response Sites
at Which Remediation Activities Have Not Yet Started
.; Site Name.
Dupont/Newcastle (battery
and scrap metal reclaiming
operation and sulfuric acid
manufacturing)
Hopewell, PA ;
Lawrence County
Easterly Sewage Treatment
Plant
Logan, PA
Blair County
F.E.. Cooper Lumber
(wood treating facility)
Broad Top, PA
Huntington County '
H.K. Porter Dump Site
BeaverCpunty
'
industrial Solvents and
Chemical, (solvent ..
reprocessing facility)
1 Stevens Road
Newberry, PA 17370
York County
* . .
J.C. Cleaners '(small dry ,
cleaning business)
30 W. Railroad St.
Gettysburg, PA 17325-
14DA
Adams County
Municipal and Industrial
Disposal Company
Cemetery. Road
Elizabeth, PA 15037
Allegheny County
'resque Isle Chemical
(abandoned recycling '
Washington, PA
irie County
EPA ID
PAD980552061
Not Available
.
Not Available
Not Available
PAD098732H8
Not Available
PAD982366353
. .
Not Available
===:
. Size
9 acres
Not,
Available
2 acres
17.5 acres
Not
Available
Not
Available
-'
110 acres
28 acres
Media
GrounUwater,
soil, -surface
water,
sediments
Groundwater,
surface water,
soil
Groundwater,
surface water,
soil
Soil, surface
water,
groundwater, .
sediments
SoiU
groundwater
s
Soil,
groundwater
Groundwater
Groundwater,
oils
Organics, lead
Benzene, chlorinated
benzene and ethenes, vinyl
chloride, TCE, PCE,
PCBs, metals .
, H -
Creosote
Lead, cadmium, PCBs,
-PAHs, cyanide
TCE, PCE, 1,1 ;i.-
Tichloroethane, other
organic compounds
PCE, TCE, C15.li2, ' '
dichloroethylene '
benzene, ethylbenzene,
naphthalene, cadmium,
chromium, lead, zinc,
ihenols, toluene, xylenes
TCE, PCE, lead,
hromium, cadmium.
opper, PCBs
.:«>.- ;:V:?-.-,'Siatois.;:?v,,::^':';::::
Further investigation
required to determine"
nature and extent of
contamination and evaluate
possible remedial response
Response selected in 1994
for treating contaminated
waste and soil using
solvent extraction followed
by treatment of
contaminated groundwater;
PADEP currently in
design phase for waste arid
soil treatment response
Selected remedial response
under internal review;
interim response to
intercept creosote that is
seeping into the Juniata '
River to be implemented.
Remedial response
proposed; waste removal
Site listed on PA Priority
List in 199.1, with a'score
of 55.72; a settlement by
PADEP with some
responsible parties for
sampling and disposal .of
waste; interim response
action conducted
Remedial response to
ncorporate groundwater
extraction/treatment and
oil vapor extraction;
design of treatment facility
PADEP conducting study
Gfoundwater remediation
esponse selected design
nd construction scheduled
or completion in 1995;
remedy selection process .
nderway for the source
perable unit to address
ontamination with TCE,
CE, lead, and PCBs
5-9
-------
Table 5-2 (continued)
Pennsylvania HSCA Remedial Response Sites
at Which Remediation Activities Have Not Yet Started
Site Name '.
Shaler/JTC (abandoned
coal washing facility)
Route 268
Bruin, PA 16022
Butler County
EPAID
PAD987396769
'-'-Size:
. 15.3 acres
, Mediai"
Ground water,
soil, sediments
, ' Contaminants - .
PCBs, PCE, PAHs, TCE,
acetone, benzene, vinyl
chloride, arsenic, lead,
cadmium, chromium,
mercury
Status
Response .proposed
Source: Fonqlvinh Department of Enviroamaml Protection '
Table5-3
Pennsylvania Other HSCA Sites at Which Remediation Activities May Be Required
. Site Name
Leighton Industries
Phoenixville,- PA
Chester County
i
Oliver Landfill
Route 97
Waterford, PA 16441
Erie County
EPAID
. Not Available
PAD981038730
-Size
Nof
.Available
.
52 acres
Media
Not Available
Ground-wafer
Contaminants
Lead, metals.
solvents
1,1 dichloroethane,
chloroethane, trans-
1,2 dichloroethene
;'":" Status. ; ' .' '
As of August 1993, the site
contained drums of
unknown substances, an
area contaminated with lead
and other-metals, and a
closed solvent disposal pit;
further investigation is
required to determine the '
nature and extent of
contamination
PRP Cleanup
Source: Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection
\ ; . - "'".'
5.3 The Market at Abandoned Sites Managed Under the Federal Superfund Program
t ,
EPA has listed 101 sites and proposed 1 site for listing in Pennsylvania on the NPL. Table 5-4 .
presents summary information from the Comprehensive Environmental Re'sponse, Compensation, and
Liability Information System (CERCLIS) database on the status of NPL sites in Pennsylvania.
Remedial actions are in progress at 25 sites and remedial design is in progress at 32 sites. Removal
actions are. hi progress at six sites. Table 5-5, at the end of this section, lists information from the
CERCLIS database available on 77 sites .and 117 operable units at which remediation activities have
not yet begun. Those sites and operable units are of the greatest interest to technology vendors;
technologies themselves may have been selected, but not vendors of those technologies. A review of
NPL site summaries indicates that there is contamination by volatile organic compounds (VOC)'in
5-10
-------
both the soil and groundwater at the majority of the NPL sites.. At many sites, there also is
contamination with heavy metals in groundwater and surface water! There also is contamination with
PAHs at several sites. The presence of PGBs also is reported in several cases. The sizes of the
contaminated areas range from less than 1 acre to more than 38,000 acres. Figure 5-3 presents data
on the size distribution of these sites. <
40
': Figure 5-3,
NPL Site Size Distribution in Pennsylvania
<1-25
25-50
51-75 76-100 101-200 201-300 >300 Mot
, Available
Acres
.The majority of NPL sites in the State are between 1 and 50 acres in size. Technologies selected for
use at the sites include biodegradation, air stripping, solidification and stabilization, vitrification, and
immobilization. Since data show that a remedial action is underway at only 25 sites, opportunities
may be present at the 77 sites where construction is not yet underway. No data were available on the
volumes of contaminated soil or groundwater present at the various sites.
Table 5-4 summarizes the number of remedial investigation and feasibility studies (RI/FS), remedial
designs (RD), remedial actions (RA), and.removals that are planned, in progress, or complete
throughout Pennsylvania. '
5-11
-------
Table 5-4
Number of Sites and Operable Units at Federal NPL Sites in Pennsylvania
Phase of Activity ; ;.: .
Remedial Investigations/Feasibility Studies
Planned
In Progress . .
Complete (RD not started)
Remedial, Designs
Planned '
In Progress
Complete (RA not started) .
Remedial Actions , : }:
Planned -
In Progress
Complete . . .
Removals " ^ : ..,- ',.''.' '..".''.'"' '
Started "
Complete
Number of Sites
:SV- ' '#''.''
10
41
.14
.77
25
32 '
50
44
32
- '^vi^. '- .':-:'. '
.
50
..44
Number of
Operable Units
17
. 47
14 ; ,
, , ' ; :>''.
117.
'.. 29
51. :
''''' ''
51
45
51
51
45
Source: Data as of May 1995 from the EPA CERCLIS database; see Section 1.8 for a detailed description of the data sources.
5.4 The Market at RCRA Corrective Action Sites
Although Pennsylvania is authorized to issue RCRA Part B hazardous waste management permits for
hazardous waste facilities, it is not authorized to administer the corrective action prograrh; all
corrective action activities are managed by EPA. Region 3. Pennsylvania does not have a separate .
State-mandated corrective action program for operating hazardous waste facilities. '
Data from the Resource Conservation and Recovery Information System (RCRIS) database indicate
that there are 237 RCRA facilities in the State: 54 land disposal units, 13 incinerators, and 214
5-12
-------
storage and treatment units2. Five of the RCRA facilities currently require corrective action. The
. definition of corrective action used here is that a facility has been required to perform a CMS. The
; number of facilities with CMS imposed is not a direct subset of RCRA treatment, storage,1 and
disposal (TSD) facilities, instead it is a subset of TSD facilities and hazardous waste generators.
While TSD facilities are statutorily required to address corrective action, EPA has discretionary
authority to impose corrective action on generators: Table 5-6, at the end of this section, presents,
those facilities. For four facilities, the entire facility is listed as subject to requirements for corrective
action. It is likely that, at those facilities; several different problems have been identified that indicate
a need for, corrective action for the entire facility. In addition, 27 facilities ate under a requirement to
conduct a RCRA facility investigation (RFI). The number of facilities with an RFI imposed is not a
' direct subset of RCRA TSD facilities, instead it is a subset of TSD facilities and hazardous waste
generators. While TSD facilities are statutorily required to address corrective action, EPA has
discretionary authority to impose corrective action on generators. As discussed in Section 1-2, these
facilities may also provide either a long-term opportunity or'near-term opportunity where no CMS is
necessary to begin corrective action or corrective activity begins in accordance with the stabilization
initiative. ^ ,
No data were available in RCRIS to identify the contaminants of concern or the media, contaminated
at the RCRA sites in, the State. However, in some cases, the name of the facility can provide a
general indication of the problems likely to be present there. Eleven of the facilities are chemical and
manufacturing plants. Three facilities use metals in the production of products. Another facility is a
printing company;; as such, it is likely to generate organic waste; In general, information available
was insufficient to support identification of actual contaminants at the RCRA facilities. Information
.also was insufficient to support identification of specific media contaminated; however, soil
contamination can be assumed to have occurred at all the facilities. Groundwater has been identified
as a SWMU at one facility. v
5.5 The Market at UST Sites Managed by the State ,
PADEP administers the State UST program. Table 5-7 presents data on the number of USTs in :
-v , . .'"' . "
Pennsylvania. Pennsylvania has more active tanks (43,953) than any other state in Region 3. Active
2 A facility may be included in more than one of these categories.
5-13 ' .' ' '
-------
tanks are defined as tanks still in service. Confirmed releases have occurred at 13 percent of the
sites.
Table 5-7
Underground Storage Tank Corrective Action Measures
in Pennsylvania as of Third Quarter FY95
Active
Tanks
43,953
Tanks x
Closed
. 34,520
!: Confirmed y
,,,V Releases;:.:-.,,',...
5,637
: . Cleanups
Initiated
4,301
:;;;v':'/ Cleanups .;.:;; ::'i:
!:; '"' Completed '''
1,082
As of July 1995, Pennsylvania reported 5,637 confirmed releases to the EPA Office of Underground
Storage Tanks (OUST). Cleanup has not yet been initiated at 1,336 of the sites. The number of
USTs identified as marketing opportunities for vendors of innovative technology will .change rapidly
because of the combination of increases in the number of confirmed releases and continuing site
closures. National studies of USTs by EPA in 1991 and 1992 found that about 81 percent of the
tanks manage gasoline, diesel fuel, kerosene, and heating oil. Of the-remaining USTs, 13 percent -
manage Other materials and wastes such as used oil (4 percent), hazardous material (2 percent), and
other material (5 percent) or are empty (2 percent). The majority of the contamination problems
caused by leaking tanks are related to the contamination of soil and groundwater with petroleum
products that contain VOCs and SVOCs. ,
As indicated above, the UST program is managed by PADEP's Bureau of Water Quality ' -
Management, Division of Storage Tanks, located in PADEP's central office in Harrisburg. Further
information on the locations of leaking USTs can be obtained from the-State (see Section 5.7),
S.6 The Market at Federal Facility Sites in Pennsylvania .
As in the case with all of the other states in Region 3, there are no Department of Energy (DOE)
facilities hi the state where remedial actions are planned. There are 28 active DoD installations and
formerly used defense sites (FUDS) located in the State, 25 of which require further remedial action.
At those 25 installations there are 198 active sites. DoD plans remediation activities for 154 of the
198 sites. . .
5-14
-------
The Defense Environmental Restoration Program Annual Report to Congress for 1994 indicates that a
total of about $747 million in funding is estimated to be needed through the year 2000 in all phases of
'cleanup at the 28 installations.. Facilities having the largest allocations of funds are Letterkenny Army
Depot ($438 million) and Naval Air Warfare Center Wanriinster ($76 million)^ Nike Missile site,
Pittsburgh-71 (Coraopolis) has the lowest funding level ($1.96 million).
The majority of the contaminants at the sites where remediation is now planned fall into one of three
/broad categories: petroleum, oil, and lubricants (POL); VOCs; and metals. Those contaminants are
found in the soil at all the sites and in the groundwater in a large percentage of the sites. Data on
volumes of soil and groundwater to be treated are not available. Table 5-8 provides information on
the individual installations and sites subject to remediation at those installations. The number of sites'
to be subject to cleanup in the future is defined in the DERP report. Cleanup already may be
underway at other sites; such sites have not been included in the total because it is unlikely that they
will afford marketing opportunities for vendors of innovative technologies. ; -
Several of the.sites at which cleanup is planned are defined as operable units in their NPL listings.
At some of those sites, there also may be areas subject to corrective action requirements under .
RCRA.
Table
DoD Installations and Sites in Pennsylvania at Which Cleanup is Planned3
Name, Address, : : ;
and Outyear Funding ($000)
C.E. Kelly Support Facility
Logough Street, Bldg. 5-6, Oakdale
15071-5000
Outyear Funding FY95-20 10
$7,646
Fort Indiantown Gap
Annville 17003-5011
Outyear Funding FY95-20 10 ,
.$10,232 ,
Letterkenny Army Depot
Chambersburg 17201-4150
Outyear Funding FY95-2099
'$438,061 : ....
MG Wurts USARC
Outyear Funding FY95-2002
$3,031
Federal Facility
Identification
Number
PA32i002234400
PA321002044400
PA321002050300
PA32100PA13700
Codesb
A.
A
A,N
A
Number of Sites at
Which Cleianup
...'"' is Planned
, °
0
34
'. : "r .
5-15
-------
Table 5-8 (continued)
DoD Installations and Sites in Pennsylvania at Which Cleanup is Planned3
Name, Address,
and Outyear Funding ($000) .
Scranton Army Ammunition Plant
Outyear Funding FY95-2005
$6,508 ,.
Tobyhanna Army Depot
18406-5000
Outyear Funding- FY95-2024
$32,029 -
Mechanicsburg SPCC
17055-0780
Outyear Funding FY95-2003
$7,708
Naval Air Station .Willow Grove
19090-5010
Outyear Funding FY95-2010
$28,247 .
Naval Air Warfare Center Warminster
18974-5000
Outyear Funding FY95-2009
$76,133
Naval Shipyard Philadelphia
Outyear Funding FY95-2003
$9,695
Ft. Indiantown Gap ANGB
Outyear Funding FY95-2008
$5,875
Greater Pittsburgh ANGB /
Outyear Funding FY95-2004
$5,606
Pittsburgh International Airport
15231-5000
Outyear Funding FY95-2007
$10,581
Willow Grove Air Force Range
Outyear Funding FY95-2002 ,
$10,145
DDRE New Cumberland
Outyear Funding FY95-2015
$28,755
Defense Personnel Support Center
Philadelphia
2800 S. 20th Street, Philadelphia 19101-
8419
Outyear Funding FY95-1999
$4,600
Fort Mifflin
Outyear Funding FY95-2008
$1,968
Federal Facility
Identification'
Number
PA321002151000
PA32 1002089200
PAS 17002210400
PA3 17000015800
PA3 17002454500
PA317002241800
PA357282882400
PA357282846900
PA357122428900
PA357122534900
PA397152064200
PA397154266500
PA39799F148700
';,, vT'
Codesb
.A
A,N
A,N
A,F
A,N
A
A
A '
A
A
A .
A
F
Number of Sites at
"" ' WhicKCIeaiiup £ ' ''"'
is Planned
1
4 '
3
6
. 9
16
'* ;
3 .
1
2
0
22
- 19
; 1
5-16
-------
Table 5-8 (continued)
D6D Installations and Sites in Pennsylvania at Which Cleanup is Planned3
> L Name; Address, ~
and Outyear funding ($000) ;
Frankfoi-d Arsenal
Outyear Funding FY95-2008
$3,553 . - '
Keystone Ordnance Works
Outyear Funding FY95-2008
$7,838 : ' '
Naval Air Station Newcumberland
Outyear Funding FY95-2008 ..
$4,395, '.-.'
Naval Ordnance Plant York
Outyear Funding FY95-2008
$2,338 . .
Nike Missile Site Philadelphia-07.
(Richboro)
Outyear Funding FY95-2008
'. $2,325 ..'.
Nike Missile Site Philadelphia-97/99
(Lansdale) ^
Outyear Funding FY95-2008
' $7,635 . ,
Nike Missile Site Pittsburgh-02 (Rural
Ridge)
Outyear Funding FY95-2008
$5,735 ' , '.''..' . , .
Nike Missile Site Pittsburgh-71
(Coraopolis) ;
Outyear Funding FY95-2008 . " . .
$1,960
Olmsted Air Force Base
Outyear Funding FY95- 1998
$14,361 .
Reading Army Air Field
Outyear Funding FY95-2008
$3,868
Valley Forge General .Hospital
Outyear Funding FY95-2008
$6,547
AH Other Installations .
$38,727
Federal Facility
Identification
Number
PA39799F144700
PA39799F144800
PA39799F155200
PA39799F154500
PA39799F145400
-PA39799F 146900
-PA39799F145200
t -
PA39799F146100
PA39799F153700
PA39799F151100
PA39799F 150000'
-
. Codes'5,
F
F
F
' F '.; '
F
F
F
F.
, F,N .
F
F
'
NiraberofeSitesatv
WhichvCieaiuip ;:
: ' :' "''-.'.'»» >''-'':'',- *»::. "*':"' ';.
is Planned :
3 _
3 ' :
. ' 3
'-2'
. '' 3;. ' ' .
'- 3 '. '
3 -
3
3
3
3 - '
'. .
Source: Defense Environmental Restoration Program Annual Report to -Congress for Fiscal Year 1994 '-
a Includes installations with funding for cleanup of more than $1 million and with three or more active sites.
b Codes: . '
A =.The installation is currently active and covered by Defense Environmental Restoration Account (DERA) funds.
F = The installation is no longer active and is managed by the FUDS Branch.
N = The site is listed on the final National Priorities List. . , ' . . ' '.
5-17.
-------
5.7 Further Market Information for Pennsylvania
A vendor that wishes to bid on any state .contract must request a vendor application for commodities
from the Department of General Services, Bureau of Purchases of the Vendor Services Division at
(717) 787-2199. The vendor uses that form to register in the State as a vendor interested in bidding
on state procurements. A vendor can learn about upcoming procurements by contacting the Vendor
Services Division.
A vendor that wishes to obtain information about sites in Pennsylvania that are managed by EPA may
write to: , ,
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Region 3
841 Chestnut Building
Philadelphia, PA 19107
For information on RCRA facilities, the envelope should be marked to the attention of the Freedom
of Information Act Officer, Office of RCRA programs. For information on CERCLA facilities, the
envelope should be marked to the attention of the Freedom of Information Act Officer, Office of
Superfund Programs. The requestor will be billed for the information depending on the volume of
information.
PADEP's public information office is a good source of information about the hazardous waste sites
that PADEP manages. The office can be contacted at: .
The Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Resources
Public Liaison Office
9th Floor, Fulton Building, 3rd and Locust Streets
P.O. Box 2063
Harrisburg, PA 17105-2063
(717)787-9580
Information specific to hazardous waste sites and State and Federal Superfund enforcement can be
obtained from PADEP's Bureau of Hazardous Sites and Superfund Enforcement at (717) 787-9368.
The bureau is responsible, for cleanup of hazardous sites and enforcement litigation activities under
- 5-18 '
-------
Federal and State law. Vendors also may contact the Bureau of Waste Management at (717) 787-
9870. The bureau supports the field operation? offices, listed below, in administering statewide
programs for hazardous, municipal, and residual solid waste management, including oversight of
Federal Superfund activities for which the State is responsible. ,
PADEP Field Operations Offices
Southeast Region (Conshohocken) (610) 832-6000 .
Counties: Bucks, Chester, Delaware, Montgomery, Philadelphia . '
.'"',' ' ' : s "
Northeast Region (Wilkes-Barre) (717)826-2511 . . . .
Counties: Carbon, Lackawanna, Lehigh, Luzerne, Monroe, Northampton, Pike, Schuylkill,'
Susquehanna, Wayne, Wyoming ..-.*
Southcentral Region. (Harrisburg) (717) 657-4585
.Counties: Adams, Bedford, Berks^ Blair, Cumberland, Dauphin, Franklin, Fulton, Huntingdon,
Juniata, Lancaster, Lebanon, Mifflin, Perry, York "
Northcentral Region (Williamsport) (717) 327-3636 .
Counties: Bradford, Cameron, Centre, Clearfield, Clinton, Columbia, Lycoming, Montour, -
Northumberland, Potter, Snyder, Sullivan, Tioga, Union
Southwest Region (Pittsburgh) (412)442-4000 v .
Counties: Allegheny, Armstrong, Beaver, Cambria, Fayefte, Greene, Indiana, Somerset, Washington,
Westmoreland , . .
Northwest Region (Meadville) (814) 332-6945 , . , ...
Counties: Butler, Clarion, Crawford, Elk, Erie, Forest, Jefferson, Lawrence, McKean, Mercer,
Venango, Warren "
A list of leaking USTs is available from PADEP's Bureau of Water Quality Management, Division of
Storage Tanks. The list and additional information can be obtained from:
Ms. Linda K. Hilbish
Administrative Assistant
The Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Resources
Bureau of Water Quality Management
Division of Storage Tanks
400 Market Street State Office Building 10th Floor
Harrisburg, PA 17101-2301
(717)772-5599 ,
5-19
-------
THIS PAGE IS INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
5-20
-------
. Table 5-5
NPL Sites in Pennsylvania at Which Marketing Opportunities Exist1
Operable Unit
Number Name . (Lead)
RA Planned *
Start Dateb
RI/FS
Completed
Media
Volume t
Contaminants
/
Technology .
SITENAME: ALW. FRANK/MID-COUNTY MUSTANG ::-": - EPA ID: PAD004351003 . ' ADDRESS: INT RTE 202 &RTE 30; EXTON, PA 19341
NPL STATUS: Final : '', . ; ' . '" , ':.. , '., -,; .. ;?\ -" -- = SIZE: 16 Acres . TYPE: ,,: Other :.:V, ;;: ./ : \ -., .'
01 NA (F/RP)
9/30/97
N 1 GW; SO; SW
NA JNA : SNA
SITE NAME: AVCO LYCOMING (WILLIAMSPQRT DIVISION) EPA ID: PAD003053709 ADDRESS: 652 OLIVER ST; WILLIAMSPORT, PA 17701
NPL STATUS: Final - ' SIZE; 28 Acres TYPE: Aircraft Engines and Engine Parts, Mfg.
01 NA . (RP/FE)
9/30/95
Y.
GW
NA
VOCs; METALS
Air Stripping Technologies; Incineration with
On-Site Disposal of Residual; Leachate
Treatment; Off-Site Treatment; Precipitation;
Steam Stripping ; Monitoring
SITENAME: BALLY.GROUND WATER CONTAMINATION EPA ID: PAD061105128 ADDRESS: RTE 100 20 N THIRD ST; BALLY, PA 19503
NPLSTATUS: Final" ' ' -' -Y,:'.::->' r, ^.-'- >:. "'. "\ '^^-:^&. CY,.^ ^ti^^Vtin?^: :^, : Y-..^ ..: ; WfeY; Ho^hi^
. 0:1 NA . , (RP/FE)
10/30/94' ;
Y
AI;GW;SO
NA- : '. . ,
VOCs
Monitoring; Air Stripping Technologies;
Leachate Treatment; Thermal Treatment with
On-Site Placement
SITENAME: BELLLANDFILL .^ : Y ': . , : vEPA ID: PAD980705107 - . -ADPRESS: TWP IRTp ^ 3|3; W%LUS1NG -TERRY T\V^, PA 18853 : j
NPL STATUS: -: Final . ' -: SIZE: '. -33 Acres ; TYPE: 'Abandoned - No Use; Reftise Systems-Co-disposal Landfill ;
--'01 NA .(RP/FE)
10/17/96
Y
AI;GW;SO;SW
NA ;
NA
Institutional Controls; Leachate Treatment; Other
Source Control Remedies ..
SITENAME: 'BERKLEY PRODUCTS CO DUMP : EPA ID: PAD980538649 . ADDRESS: RD 2; DENVER, PA ; 17517
NPLSTATUS: Final SIZE: 2 Acres - , .. . . TYPE:.' Refuse Systems-CMisposal Landfill
01, NA " " (F){l2/31/96 ' 1 . :N | RC; ST ! NA . . .' . [ NA . ; JNA; .
SITE NAME: BERKS LANDFILL " EPA ID: PAD000651810 ADDRESS: RD 8348; SINKING SPRING, PA 19608
NPLSTATUS: Final - SIZE! 58 Acres TYPE: Refuse Systems-Co-disppsal Landfill
. 01 NA (RP)
5/01/97
N
GW; SD; SO; ST;
SW
NA
NA.
NA
,
Data as of May 1995 from EPA CERCLIS and RELAI Databases. See' Section 1.45 for a detailed description of these data sources. ; ' .
Some RA planned start dates have, passed; the actual RA start date had not been recorded as of March 1995. This circumstance may have occurred because (1) the project is
running later than planned or (2) the actual RA start date Was recorded after the data were extracted.
Abbreviations: . . : .
AI
DB
DK
EP
ES
Ait-
Debris
Unknown
EPA In-House
Entire Site
F
FE
FF
GW
LW
EPA Fund-Financed
Federal Enforcement
Federal Facilities
Graundwater
Liquid Waste
MR
.MS
NA
NO
OT
Mixed Funding Federal/RP
Man-made Structures
Not Available ,
- No Media
Other ; :
PS
- RA
RC
RP
S
PRP Response Under State
-Remedial Actions -
RCRA Hazardous Waste .
Responsible Party
Slate, Fund-Financed
.' SD
SI
SL
. SO
SR
. Sediment
Single Intake .
Sludge
Soil
- PRP Lead Under State
ST
SW
UXO
VOCs
Solid Waste
Surface Water
Unexploded Ordnance
Volatile Organic
' Compounds
5-21
-------
Table S-S (continued)
NPL Sites in Pennsylvania at Which Marketing Opportunities Exfel'
Operable Unit
Number Name . (Lead)
RA Planned
Start Dale*
RI/FS
Completed
SITE NAME: BLOSENSKI LANDFILL
NPL STATUS: Final
03 NA (RP)
04 NA- . (F/RP)
3/30/97
3/30/95
NA
NA
SITE NAME: BOARHEAD FARMS ; .
NPL STATUS: Final .
01 - NA . ' '. (F) | 4/01/99 | N
Media
Volume >(
Contaminants
Technology
EPA ID: PAD980539985 ADDRESS: RTE 340; WEST CALN TWP, PA 19376
SIZE: 20 Acres TYPE: -Abandoned - No Use; Refuse Systems-Co-disposal Undfill
AI; DB; GW; LW;
SD; ST; SW
AI; DB; GW; LW;
SD; ST; SW
NA
NA '
NA
NA
NA
NA "
EPA ID: PAD04772616I ADDRESS: LONELY COTTAGE DR; BRIDGETON TWP, PA 18972
SIZE: 113 Acres TYPE: Other : ;. ^ - '"
GW/, SO; SW
NA ' -JNA
NA
SITE NAME: BRODHEAD CREEK ....'...' EPA ID: PAD980691760 ADDRESS: S OF MAIN ST BRG; STROUDSBURG, PA -18360
NPL STATUS:; Final . SIZE: -12 Acres . ' . TYPE; r Unknown
01 FREE COAL TAR (PS/FE/RP)
.02 RESIDUAL COAL TAR
ANDGW (RP/FE)
3/31/96
6/30/97
Y
N "
GW; LW; SO; SW
GW;SO
179 cy
NA
VOCs; METALS;
CREOSOTES
NA
Monitoring; Innovative Technology; Disposal of
Residual; Incineration with On-Site Disposal of
Residual; Off-Site Treatment
NA
SITE NAME: BROWN'S BATTERY BREAKING EPA ID; PAD980831812 ADDRESS: USHER LANE RD; BERNE, PA. 19526
NPLSTATUS: Final"-. .: ' ^ ': =: ' : /;': SIZEl : V? Acres '/ '. -:- - - ?!, TYPE: ; NA
02 REMEDIATE SOILS AND GW (F/RP)
12/31/97
NA
DB; GW; MS; SO
67,000 cy
METALS; OTHER
INORGANICS
Off-Site Treatment; Thermal Treatment with On-
Site Placement; Disposal of Residual;
Precipitation; PH Neutralization, Other
Neutralization; Steam Stripping; Monitoring; '
Pump and Treat at POTW with Discharge
SITE NAME: BUTLER MINE TUNNEL - ; ./, EPA ID: PAD980508451 ADDRESS: SUSQUEHANNA RIVER; PlftSTON TW^fpA 18640 ;: :
NPLSTATUS: Final " " "" ' . SIZE: 38,400 Acres , TYPE: : Abandoned - No Use .; ; ^ , - ,. > ... .:
01 NA ' (RP/FE)
9/30/96 N
SW -
NA NA
NA
Data as of May 1995 from EPA CERCLIS and RELAI Databases. See Section 1.8 for a detailed description of these data sources. :
Some RA planned start dates have passed; the actual RA start'date had not been recorded as of March 1995. This circumstance may have occurred because (1) the project is
running later than planned or (2) the actual RA start date was recorded after the data were extracted.
Abbreviations: '
AI
DB
DK
EP
ES
Air
Debris
Unknown
EPA In-House
Entire Site
F
FE
FF
GW
LW
EPA Fund-Financed
Federal Enforcement
Federal Facilities
Groundwater
Liquid Waste
MR
MS
NA
NO
OT
Mixed Funding Federal/RP
Man-made Structures
Not Available
No Media
Other :
PS
RA
RC
RP
S
PRP Response Urtder State
Remedial Actions
RCRA Hazardous Waste
Responsible Party
State, Fund-Financed
SD
SI
SL
SO
SR
. : ' i
Sediment
Single Intake
Sludge
Soil
PRP Lead Under State
ST
SW.
UXO
VOCs
Solid Waste
Surface Water
Unexploded Ordnance
Volatile Organic
Compounds
-------
lable 5-5 (continued)
NPL Sites in Pennsylvania at Which Marketing Opportunities Exist'
Operable Unit
Number Name (Lead)
RA Planned
Start Dateb
RI/FS
Completed
Media _
Volumei
SITENAME: BUTZ LANDFILL - : . / : \; i : : . : >:F; i : ; EPA ID: PAD98 1034705 "
NPfcSTATUS: Final . . ,! ' ..,. : ,- . , ':-, -,- .-V . - ,, ;," -^ * . :-. . SIZE:; ;_ 13 Acres ' ; '.,....
01 NA. ' ' (F)
6/30/96
Y
GW
NA '
SITE NAME: "^C&D RECYCLING . EPA ID: PAD021449244
NPtSTATOSu. FinaM ^ SIZE: SO Acres
01 NA . . (RP/FE)
12/31/96
Y
AI; DB; GW; SD;
SO;SW
Contaminants
Technology .
ADDRESS: RD #5.TWP RTE 601; JACKSON TWP, PA 18360
TYPE: qnknqwn;Reft|se;Syst.ems--Co-disposal Landfill ,
VOCs; DNAPLs;
PLASTICS
Air Stripping Technologies; Disposal of
Residual; Precipitation; Leachate Treatment; 'Off-
Site Treatment
ADDRESS: R.D, #1 - SANDY RUN; FREELAND, PA 18224
TYPE: Unknown
20,565 cy I METALS
- ! .
SITENAME: CENTRE COUNTY KEPONE . EPA ID: PAD000436261
NPL STATUS: Final " SIZE: 4 Acres
:01 NA - .. (RP/FE)T 12/29/97
Y
GW; SD; SO; SW
NA
SITENAME: COMMODORE SEMICONDUCTOR GROUP v '. : EPA ID;;;:PAb093730174 /
NPLSTATUS: Final ";v ' '" '''' ' ' ' ' '-_','' ' '-.'.'' . ' ' -'. vSIZE: . ' 10' Acres "*': ' -' "'
01 NA .'.. (RP/FE)
03/30/95 .
Y
1 - .
GW.
.
NA
'
SITENAME: CRATER RESOURCES/KEYSTONE COKE/ALAN WOOD STEEL EPA ID: PAD9804 19097
NPLSTATUS: Firml " ' v SIZE: NA
01 .- NA . (RP/F)
12/30/97 N JDK NA
SITO NAME: : CROSSLEY FARM - . EPA ID: PAD98 1740061
NPLSTATUS: Final:;.; : ,-- ..- . . . -SIZE:. ''34 Acres. . - ' .".
01 KA (F/RP)
12/30/97 . j ( N .
GW
NA .
Monitoring; Decontamination; Off-Site
.Treatment; Recycling; Disposalof Residual;
Solidification and Stabilization
ADDRESS: 201. STRUBLERD; STATE COLLEGE, PA 16801
TYPE: Industrial Organic Chemicals; Agricultural Chemicals, Organic &
Inorganic ''
NA
NA
ADDRESS: VAN BUREN & RITTENHOUSE RDS; NORRISTOWN, PA
':- /:v;-:-19403-:: ""^^'' ";>; r. '-:.;- -::;;:--v:, :'--/ -
TYPE: Abandoned - No Use '.' . . .,
VOCs
. ' .'. ' 'V-
Air Stripping Technologies; -Disposal of
Residual; Leachate Treatment; Pump and Treat at
POTW with Discharge; Off-Site Treatment;
Monitoring ,
ADDRESS: 2200 RENAISSANCE BOULEVARD; KING OF PRUSSIA, PA
19406.
TYPE: Abandoned - No Use; Undeveloped Land (Inch
forests.fields, wetlands)
PAHs; VOCss; METALS | NA
ADDRESS: HUFF'S CHURCH ROAD & BLACKHEADiiILL; r r.
TYPE: ' : Abandoned -: No Use: y : X ;; : ;: :; :-\ .; "...' :-;; - , .'; x : : - .
NA
NA ;
Data as of May 1995 from EPA CERCLIS and RCLAI Databases.: See Section 1.8 for a detailed description of these data sources.
Some RA planned start dates have passed; the actual RA start date had not been recorded as of March 1995. This circumstance may have occurred because (1) the project is
running later than planned or (2) the actual RA start date was recorded after the data were extracted. ". -
Abbreviations: . ' . ' .
AI
DB
DK
EP
ES
Air - '
Debris ,
Unknown
EPAIn-House .
Entire Site
F
FE
FF
GW
: LW
EPA. Fund-Financed
Federal Enforcement
Federal Facilities
Groundwater
Liquid Waste
MR
MS
NA
NO
OT
Mixed Funding Federal/RP
Man-made Structures.
Not Available
No Media
. Other .
PS
RA
RC
RP
, s
PRP Response Under State '
Remedial Actions
RCRA Hazardous Waste
Responsible Party .
State, Fund-Financed
SD
SI
SL
SO
SR
Sediment
Single Intake
Sludge
Soil
PRP Lead Under State
ST
SW
UXO
VOCs
Solid Waste
" Surface Water
Unexploded Ordnance
Volatile Organic
Compounds
5-23
-------
Table 5-5 (continued)
NPL Sites In Pennsylvania at Which Marketing Opportunities Exist*
Operable Unit
Number Name (Lead)
RA Planned
Start Date11
RI/FS
Completed
Media
Volume ,
Conlamtnants
Technology
SITE NAME: CROYDONTCB ' EPA ID: PAD98I035009 ADDRESS: RIVER RD; CROYDON & BRISTOL TWP PA 19020
NPL STATUS: Final SIZE: .2,560 Acres TYPE: Residential-Private Home Ownership; Dwelling Operators.
' V ' " ' ; - Except Apartments! Mobile Home Site Operators; Nonrcsidential
" '" .'-.':.. . '.. " Building Operators; Elementary and Secondary; Garment
- . .. . , = ; r :' : - ""-; :.'.".. -:. ::~ :'.-.' : .-..-. -.:. Pressing and Cleaners' Agents; Industrial Inorganic Chemicals;
. .. ;.:i . -: - '-7VV ; :: . \ --: -'' ..: "I.': ."-.. '.-. Industrial Organic Chemicals; Maputacturlng (Electropladng;
". . "'"'"" - --'. --..;.- - _ - . " Agrieultora] Chemicals. Organic & iqorganie;'paper Mills;; :
:- .-._ ,,,^ -,.- " ''-.. ; . -. " Industr!al:Equlpmer«; Recycling W«s^0j|) ::'-: ::''
03 NA (RP)
12/31/98
NA.
NA
NA
NA
NA
Si?^ CRYOCHEM'INC EPAID; PAD002360444 ADDRESS: RTE 562; WORMAN TWP.. BOYERTOWN, PA' 195J2
..^.EA.S! Fmal S'ZE: 19 Acres TYPE: Cold Finishing of Sleel Shapes
03 NA (F)
12/30/95 Y(FS)
AI;SD;SO I NA " ' i VOCs
Monitoring; Air Stripping Technologies;
Leachate Treatment; Off-Site Treatment
SITENAME: DELTA QUARRIES ft DISP./STOTLER LANDFILL : EPA IDf PAD98 1038052 "-"? ; ? ADDRESS: UNOBTAINABLE; ;ANf ISLAND LOGAN^TWPS PA'leoW""
NPL STATUS: Final : SIZE: 40 Acres .< - ; , ' . TYPE: Abandoned .:Nc. Use; RefiiseSystems-.CoKjisposal Landfill
01 NA (RP/FE)
7/01/95
Y
AI; GW; SD; SW
NA
VOCs; METALS
Monitoring; Air Stripping Technologies; Disposal
of Residual; Leachate Treatment; Precipitation;
Pump and Treatment
SITENAME: DORNEY ROAD LANDFILL : ; -a :- '; : EPA ID: PJVD98Q508832 : , > ADDRESS: DORNEY RbrM^RTZtoW PA 19539 : : V ^> ; -:
jN!L5^nB! .. Final ; SIZE: 38Acres^ : TYPE: ; r vAbanddhSd^NorUse; Refuse Systerns-CoHlisposal Landfiif '
01 OW1-LANDFILLCAP&
WETLANDS (S/F/RP)
02 'GROUND WATER (S/F/RP)
6/30/95
9/30/95
Y
Y
GW; SD; SO; ST;
SW
GW
NA
NA
NA " '
METALS; VOCs;
DNAPLs; PLASTICS
Monitoring; Disposal of Residual
Leachate Treatment; Monitoring; Pump and
Treatment . . '
SITENAME: DOUGLASSVILLE DISPOSAL , ; : EPA IDr PAD002384865 > ADDRESS: RTfi' 124- DbUGLASSVILLE' PA : 195 18" -:; "V: V
NPL STATUS:. Final; . . : '.. =: - : SIZE: . 50 Acres . '- TYPE: Abandoned- No Use ' ^: -:^ -:-
. 04 ON-SITE INCINERATION (F) j 6/30/95 \ NA [NA - . - i NA
NA = JNA '
Data as of May 1995 from EPA CERC.LIS and RELAI Databases. See Section 1.8 for a detailed description of these data sources.
Some RA planned start dates have passed; the actual RA start date had not been recorded as of March 1995. This circumstance may have occurred because (1) the project is
running later than planned or (2) the actual RA start date was recorded after the data were extracted. "
Abbreviations:
AI Air
DB Debris
DK Unknown
EP. EPAIn-House
ES-. Entire Site
F
' FE
FF
GW
LW
EPA Fund-Financed
Federal Enforcement
Federal Facilities
Groundwater
Liquid Waste
MR
MS
NA
NO
OT
Mixed Funding Federal/RP
Man-made Structures
Not Available
No Media. .
Other
PS
RA
RC
RP
S
PRP Response, Under State
Remedial Actions
RCRA Hazardous Waste
Responsible Party
State, Fund-Financed
SD
SI
SL
SO
SR
i
Sediment
Single Intake
Sludge
Soil
PRP Lead Under State
ST
SW
UXO
VOCs
Solid Waste
Surface Water
Unexploded Ordnance
Volatile Organic '
Compounds
-------
, NFL Sites in Pennsylvania at Which Marketing Opportunities Exist9
Operable Unit
Number Name , (Lead)
RA Planned
Start Dateb
RI/FS
Completed
Media
Volume
Contaminants
Technology
SITENAME: DRAKE CHEMICAL . : : . EPA ID: PAD003058047 ' ADDRESS: 180 MYRTLE ST; LOCK HAVEN, 1 PA 17745 ;
NPL STATUS: Final :-'..... . ; .--,-. , .;.: .:' ...-...- ::..-...^ .".., .SIZE: 8 Acres . TYPE: Abandqnetf- No Use :...--, \:.":'" : ' ,
04 NA .-...- - (F)
6/30/96
NA
,GW
NA
NA , .
NA
SITENAME: DUBLIN TCE SITE EPA ID: PAD98 1740004 ' ADDRESS:' 120 MILL ST./ WHISTLEWOOD APT-RTE 313; DUBLIN, PA
NPL STATUS: Final ' SIZE; 5 Acres - 18917
TYPE: Electrometallurgical Products; General Warehousing and Storage
01 NA ; ; (EP/Fj
02, NA . . (RP)
.5/30/95
6/11/98.
Y .
N
GW
GW; SD; SO
NA
NA
VOCs; DNAPLs;
PLASTICS
NA-
Air Stripping Technologies; Disposal of
Residual; Leachate Treatment; Monitoring
NA '
SITENAME: EAST TENTH STREET EPA ID: PAD987323458 . ADDRESS: 201. EAST 10TH STREET; MARCUS HOOK, PA 19061
NPL STATUS: Proposed . " '' [ ' ' SIZE: NA TYPE: NA
.01 NA . . (F/RP)j 9/30/99
N INA
NA .
NA
NA
SITENAME: EASTERN DIVERSIFIED METALS EPA ID: PAD980830533 ADDRESS: LINCOLN ^ AVE; HOMETOWN-RUSH TWP, PA;18252^-; V
NPL STATUS: Final , :. .. ; .; SIZE: 34 Acres .. . TYPE: Sanitary Services-Wastewater Treatment Plant ?V;- r ; :
. 02 . GROUNDWATER (RP/FE)
03 NA (RP/FE)
9/30/96
12/01/96
Y (FS)
Y(FS)
GW; LW; SW
AI; DB; GW; SD;
SO
NA .- JNA
NA
METALS; PCBs; ' *
PESTICIDES/
HERBICIDES; VOCs;'
DIOXIN; DNAPLs;
PLASTICS
NA
Off-Site Treatment; Recycling; Monitoring
SITENAME: ELIZABETHTOWN LANDFILL ' - EPA ID: PAD980539712 ADDRESS: W RIDGE RD; ELIZABETHTOWN. PA 17022 '
NPL STATUS^ Jinal^:-,; ;..?.:>; ; ::::.vi:,':..^,.; '-' :U>y-; -' :%:\.:;:.:.^v : H.-'.v:,"SiZE:.'-^«iActes.. :,;:!",.:-:-, :^. fVfE:':^' Refuse1 Sysfcms--Co-disposal Landfill ^:?. i : -,:. ;
01 NA . (RP/FE) 1 9/30/97 I N
DB; GW; LW; SW
NA
NA
NA '
SITENAME: FISCHER & PORTER CO : . ' Y ^ EPAID: :PAD002345817 ADDRESSi JACKSON VILLE&STRD; WARMINSTER PA 1 8974 ;
NPL STATUS: Final : / :-. :.:,.. SIZE: : 6 Acres . ' . .-.-.. TYPE: Plumbing Fixture Fittings and Trim i :;=;:: \
02 REM. EVAL. OF ORIGINAL RI/FS (F)
4/01/97
N DK " NA . INA . .
NA .-. ' :-...
Dataasof May 1995 from EPA CERCLIS and RELAI Databases. See Section 1.8 for a detailed description of these data sources. . ' ,
Some.RA planned start dates have passed; the actual RA start date.had not been recorded as of March 1995. This circumstance may haye occurred because (1.) the project is
running later than planned or (2) the actual RA start date was recorded after the data were extracted. .* . .
Abbreviations: . ....-'
AI
DB
DK
EP
ES-
Air
Debris
Unknown
EPA In-House
Entire Site
F
FE
FF
GW
LW
EPA Fund-Financed
Federal Enforcement
Federal Facilities
Grouridwater
Liquid Waste
MR
MS
NA
NO
OT
Mixed Funding Federal/RP
Man-made Structures
' Not Available .
No Media ' .
.Other .,
PS
RA
RC
RP
S
PRP Response Under State
' Remedial Actions
RCRA Hazardous Was.te
Responsible Party
State, Fund-Financed
SD
SI
SL
SO
SR
'Sediment
Single Intake
Sludge
Soil
PRP Lead Understate
ST
SW
UXO
VOCs
Solid Waste
Surface Water
Unexpected Ordnance
Volatile Organic
Compounds
-.- . -.:.--., 5-25- . , .. ' , . , , .; , ' , J
-------
Tpbte 5-5 (continued)
NPL Sites to Pennsylvania at Which Marketing Opportunities Exist'
Operable Unit
Number Name (Lead)
RA Planned
Start Date*
RI/FS
Completed
Media
Volume ,
Conlamtnanls
Technology
SITE NAME: FOOTE MINERAL CO EPA ID: PAD077087989 ADDRESS: 15 S BACTON HILL RD; FRAZER, PA 19355
NPL STATUS: Final SIZE: NA " TYPE: Abandoned - No Use
01 NA (R/PF)
9/30/98
N
DK
NA
NA
NA
SITENAME: HAVERTOWNPCP V : - EPA ID: PAD002338010 ADDRESS: EAGLE RD RC DRAWER F; HAVERFORD TWP., PA 19041
NPL STATUS: Final ,.. >.:: i .:-.>' ^: /SIZE; 15 Acre$ - - TYPE: Abandoned -No Use " ' '" ^ '"': '^-^:^^ - . ^-'
02 NA (F)
03 NA ' (F)
6/30/96
3/30/97
Y
N
GW; OT; SD; SW
GW
NA
NA
METALS; PESTICIDES/
HERBICIDES: VOCs;
CREOSOTES; DIX01NS;
DNAPLs; PLASTICS
NA
Disposal of Residual; Leachate Treatment; Off-
Site Treatment; Steam Stripping; .Thermal
Treatment with On-Sile Placement; Precipitation
NA
SITENAME: HELEVA LANDFILL . " EPA ID: PAD980537716 ADDRESS: GARAGE HILL ST; COPLAY (IRONTON VILLAGE), PA
NPL STATUS: Final SIZEi 93 Acres 18037;
' . .. TYPE: Crop Production; Refuse Systems-Co-dlsposal Landfill
03 GROUND WATER PUMP
& TREAT (F/RP)
12/31/96
.
NNA
GW
100,000 gal.
VOCs
Disposal of Residual; Monitoring; Pump and
Treatment
SITENAME: HUNTERSTOWN ROAD . ' EPA ID: PAD980830897 ' ADDRESS: RD US; GETTYSBURG, PA 17325
NPL STATUS: Final .- ; SIZE: 3 Acres . TYPE: ' Undeveloped Land (Incl. f6rests.,fields,wetlands); Refii§eJ 1^ /
" ".J ,.-.-. ...--'. ""-. .'-..-" - --.--.' '-'---. ". '""". ' .:...-"... '"i"^'- :'=".. " .- ,."-.' Systems-Open Dump'--: '"._ ;.''":-'":: : '. " '. ' 'V.* "^ :^-;-::;
01 NA . (RP/FE/F)
2/27/96
Y;
DB; GW; SD; SO;
SW
l,200cy;5,100cy
"
VOCs; METALS
Soil Cover; Disposal of Residual; Off-Site
Treatment; Solidification and Stabilization; Air
Stripping Technologies; Thermal Treatment with
On-Site Placement; Monitoring; Incineration with
On-Site Disposal of Residual; Pump and
Treatment
SITENAME: JACKS CREEK/SITKIN SMELTING AND REFINERY : : : : = ;; EPA ID: PAD980829493 '-. ADDRESS: PO BOX 7Q8; LEWIST OWN, PA5^ 17044 ;;::^ *5%^ *:-
NPL STATUS: Final SIZE: 115 Acres . TYPE: Recycling Waste.Oil : : / .' : : .
01 NA (F/FE) 1 9/29/98 '
N
GW; MS; RC; SD;
SO; SW
NA ! NA
:
' ~
NA ' '
' Data as of May 1995 from EPA CERCLIS and RELAI Databases. See Section 1.8 for a detailed description of these data sources.
b Some RA planned start dates have passed; the actual RA start date had not been recorded as of March 1995. This circumstance may have occurred because (1) the project is
running later than' planned or (2) the actual RA start date was recorded after the data were extracted. ' '
Abbreviations: ,
AI
DB
DK
EP
ES
Air
Debris
Unknown
EPA In-House
Entire Site
F
FE
FF
GW:
LW
EPA Fund-Financed
Federal Enforcement
Federal Facilities
Groundwater
Liquid Waste
MR
MS
NA
NO
OT
Mixed Funding Federal/RP
Man-made Structures
Not Available
No Media
Other - -
PS
RA
RC
RP
S .
PRP Response Under State
Remedial Actions
RCRA Hazardous Waste
Responsible Party
State, Fund-Financed
SD
SI
SL
SO
SR
i
Sediment
Single Intake
Sludge
Soil
PRP Lead Under State
ST
SW
UXO
VOCs
Solid Waste
Surface Water
Unexploded Ordnance
'Volatile Organic
Compounds
-------
NPL Sites in Pennsylvania at Which Marketing Opportunities Exist3
Operable Unit
Number Name . ' (Lead).
RA Planned
Start DateV
RI/FS
Completed
Media
Volume
Contaminants
Technology
SITENAME: KEYSTONE SANITATION LANDFILL .--."_' : - EPA ID: PAD054 142781 ADDRESS: RD#i- HANOVER, PA 17331 - =: .V
NPL STATUS: . Final -,--\ .-.: . . , V. '':. '': -_ ,v ;Y;;: . '{ .'.-: :.-.. : ;-; v ; :- . : SIZE: 40Acres ' TYPE: Refuse Systems--Co:disposal Landfill . :_ - ;
02 NA - : (F/RP)
03 .NA (RP)
04 NA (RP)
.12/30/98 '. .
12/31/95
12/31/95 '
N'
NA
NA
GW; LW; SD; SW
NA
NA .
NA .
NA
NA. .
-NA
NA .
NA
NA
NA ; ' . - -
NA'
SITE NAME: LETTERKENNY ARMY DEPOT (Ppp.AREA) ; :;/:' .JPAIDt; PA2210090054 ADDRESS: N FRANKUN ST; CHAMBERSBURG, PA 17201 >. :
NPLSTATUS: Final / . "'.v^i'::^.; :' :";; . '. : - .;'; ' j ;;._> " -.v; ' . SIZEY V;;' 250 Acres '. ' ' - . . . TYPE:- ./Crop Productibn; Misc. -^'.': '7 i P- :; t;:'; ,:o :
.02 SOURCE (FF)
03 GROUND WATER (FE)
.04 OFF-AREA GROUNDWATER ' (FE)
3/31796 . [N.
12/31/97. j N
12/31/96 \ N
SO JNA
NA
GW ."'"' ' JNA ' ' JNA .
GW
NA '.-"-'.:
.NA '...-. . '
NA JNA JNA
SITENAME: LETTERKENNY ARMY DEPOT (SE AREA) EPAID: PA6213820503 ADDRESS: N FRANKLIN ST EXT; CHAMBERSBURG, PA 17201
NPL STATUS: .Final SIZE: 170 Acres TYPE: Misci; Ordnance Production and Storage, Testing, and
Maintenance
02 GROUNDWATER (FF)
03 BASE-WIDE (NO
ACTION SMUS) (FF)
04 STORM SEWERS & CONTAM.
SOILS (FF)
05 AREA A & B SOILS (FF)
6/30/96
9/30/97
12/31/96
.9/30/97
N '
N
N
N
.06 OFF-POST GROUNDWATER . (FF) j 3/31/97 N
GW; SO
DK; GW
SO
so -
GW
5,000 cy .' , , j NA
NA .
7,000cy '-.'_.
NA -..-.'
NA.
NA
NA -
,
NA .
NA
Other/Unknown/UndeterminedTechnology-,
Other/Unknawn/UndeterminedTechnology
Other/Unknown/Unde'termined Technology : .
Other/Unknown/UndeterminedTechnblogy
Other/Unknown/Undetermined Technology
SITENAME: LINDANEDUMP EPA ID: PAD980712798 ADDRESS: RTE 28 & SPRING HILL RD; HARRISON TWP, PA 15065
NPLSTATUS: Final j SIZE: 30 Acres TYPE: NA
01 NA (FE/RP)
9/30/96
'
Y
DB; GW; LW; SD;
SO; ST; SW
.
NA
METALS; PESTICIDES/
HERBICIDES; VOCs
Surface Capping Only; Disposal ol Residual; Air
Stripping Technologies; Monitoring; Leachate
Treatment . .-
Dataasof May 1995 from EPA CERCLIS and RELAI Databases. See Section'1.8 for a detailed description of these .data sources.
Some RA planned start dates have passed; the actual RA start date had not been recorded as of March 1995. this circumstance may have occurred because (1) the project is
running later than planned or (2) the actual RA start date was recorded after the data were extracted. '
Abbreviations: : ' -.
AI
DB
DK
EP
ES
Air
Debris
Unknown
EPA In-House
Entire Site -
.F
- FE
FF
GW
LW
EPA Fund-Financed '
Federal Enforcement
Federal Facilities
Grpundwater
Liquid Waste
MR
MS
NA
NO
OT
Mixed Funding Federal/RP
Man-made Structures
'Not Available
No Media
Other
PS
RA
-------
Table 5-5 (continued)
NPL Sites to Pennsylvania at Which Marketing Opportunities Exist*
Operable Unit
Number Name (Lead)
RA Planned
Start Date1
RI/FS
Completed
Media
Volume .
Contaminants
Technology
SITE NAME: MALVERNTCB ' EPA IDs PADOI4353445 ADDRESS: 258 N. PHOENIXVILLE PK; MALVERN, PA 19355
NPL STATUS: Final . SIZEt 2 Acres TYPE: Olher
01 NA (RP/FB)
6/30/98
Y
GW; SO
NA
NA
NA
SITE NAME: METAL BANKS . EPA ID: PAD046557096 ADDRESS; COTTMAN& DELAWARE AVE; PHILADELPHIA, PA
NPL STATUS; Final : . SIZEi lOAcres - 19135 : ' , ;,;:-=;' ,
';::., .- . TYPE: Abandoned -No Use = , -.". - ;^": 'I--
01 NA (RP/FE) 1 9/30/97 i N
! 1
DB; GW; MS; SD; NA |NA
SO; SW ' | . ' 1 . . .
NA .
SITE NAME: METROPOLITAN MIRROR AND GLASS EPA ID: PAD982366957 ADDRESS: INDUSTRIAL RD; FRACKV1LLE, PA 17931
NPL STATUS: Final SIZE: 8 Acres , TYPE: Recycling - Other
01 NA " (RP/F)
SITE NAME: : MIDDLETOWN AIR FIELD
NPL STATUS: Final " ; '
03/03/98
N
SL;SO;SW
NA
NA '
NA
EPA ID: ;; PAD980538763 ADDRESS: APPRQX-1 MLE OFF RTE 230; ^JDPLETOWN; PA ':\ 170S7:p
SIZE: .36 Acres -. _ TYPE: Air Transportation, ^^ Scheduled Metal [ dealing arid /Allied Services
03 SUPPLEMENTAL STUDY/SOIL T 12/31/98 1 N [so
MODEL (F/RP) ! j |
NA
NA'.
NA
SITE NAME: MODERN SANITATION LANDFILL EPA ID: PAD980539068 ADDRESS: PROSPECT RD; YORK, PA 17404
NPL STATUS: Final :: -:; : ; ^ -; - .- '' ' . SIZE: : 72 Acres ; "' - ' ";',.- .TYPE: Refuse Systems--Municipal EandfiU land CpKlisppsaliLandfili;: ; :
01 NA (PS/FE/RP)
6/30/96"
,
Y
DB; GW; SO; SW
NA
METALS; OTHER
INORGANICS; .
RADIOACTIVE
MATERIALS; VOCs
Surface Capping Only; Disposal of Residual; Air
Stripping Technologies; Biodegradation and
Bioremediation Treatment; Steam Stripping;
Monitoring; Leachate Treatment;- Pump and
Treatment
" Data as of May 1995 from EPA CERCLIS and RELAI'Databases. See Section 1.8 for a detailed description of these data sources. %
b Some RA planned start dates have passed; the actual RA start date had not been recorded as of March 1995. This ckcumstance may have occurred because (1) die project is
running later than planned or (2) the actual RA start date was recorded after the data were extracted. . . ~
Abbreviations:
AI
DB
DK
EP
ES
Air *
Debris
Unknown
EPA In-House
Entire Site
F
- FE
FF
GW
LW
EPA Fund-Financed
Federal Enforcement .
Federal Facilities:
Groundwater -
Liquid Waste
MR
: MS
NA
NO
OT
Mixed Funding Federal/RP
Man-made Structures
Not Available
No Media
Other ,
PS
RA
RC
RP
S
PRP Response Understate
Remedial Actions
RCRA Hazardous Waste
Responsible Party
Slate, Fund-Financed
SD
SI .
SL
SO
SR
i
Sediment
Single Intake
Sludge
Soil '
PRP Lead Under State
ST
SW
UXO
VOCs
Solid Waste
Surface Water
Unexploded Ordnance
Volatile Organic
Compounds '
-------
NPL Sites in Pennsylvania at Which Marketing Opportunities Exist'
Operable Unit
Number.. Name . '(Lead)
RA Planned
Start Date"
SITE NAME: MW MANUFACTURING :
NPLSTATUS: .Final-/. ."' ' : V-:: i ; .V -,-: ' ". : .- .'.-,,.
01 GROUNDWATER (F/RP)
*..'"- "
03 FLUFF WASTE (F)
04 WATERLINE (RP)
12731/95.
12/3,1/95
9/30/95
SITE NAME: NAVAL AIR DEVELOPMENT CENTER (8 AREAS)
NPLSTATUS; Final
01 GROUNDWATER' ' (FF)
04 AREA C GROUNDWATER (FF)
12/31/94.
6/30/96 .
RI/FS
Completed
Media
Volume
, Contaminants
Technology -
EPA ID: PAD980691372 ADDRESSi STATE ROUTE 54 AND 1-80; VALLEY TWP, PA 17821
.. SIZE: 20 Acres ' TYPE: , . General Warehousing and Storage-
Y
Y
NA
GW
DB;DK;GW;
SO; SW
NA
NA .
32,000 cy; 130 cy;
86,000 gal.
' .^
NA
METALS; PESTICIDES/
HERBICIDES; VOCs
METALS; PCBs; VOCs;
DNAPLs; PLASTICS
NA
Air Stripping Technologies; Disposal of
Residual; Precipitation; Leachate Treatment; Off-
Site Treatment; Steam Stripping; Monitoring;
Incineration with On-Site Disposal of Residual;
Pump and Treatment
Incineration with On-Site Disposal of Residual;
Off-Site Treatment; Solidification and
Stabilization; Monitoring; Disposal of Residual;
Leachate Treatment - :
NA
EPA ID: PA6170024545 ADDRESS: ST & JACKSONVILLE RD; WARMINSTER, PA 18974
. . SIZE; 2 Acres TYPE: Misc.; Refuse Systems-Open Dump and Co-disposal Landfill;
Airports, Flying Fields, and Services
Y
Y
GW
NA
NA
NA
VOCs; METALS
NA
Air Stripping Technologies; Leachate Treatment;
Off-Site Treatment; Precipitation; Steam
Stripping; Monitoring
NA
SITE NAME: NAVY SHIPS PARTS CONTROL CENTER EPA ID: PA3170022104 ADDRESS: BOX 2020; MECHANICSBURG, PA 17055 ;
NPL STATUS: Final - ' ;. -.. .; SIZE: 824 Acres TYPE: -NA / ', : .
: 01 ' NA (FF)
9/30/98 :. N
NA
NA JNA NA
SITE tfAME; NORTH PENN - AREA 1 , EPA ID; PAD096834494 ADDRESS: 162 N MAIN ST; SOUDERTON, PA 18964
NPLSTATUS: Final SIZE: .NA , TYPE: Power Laundries. Family and Commercial; Industrial Laundcters
01 SOURCE CONTROL (F/RP) '1 12/30/95
Y
GW;SO .'NA ' JNA
Pump and Treatment
SITE NAME: :: /NORTH PENN - AREA 2 ' ; : EPA ID: PAD002342475 ' ADDRESS: 1 SPRING AVE; HATFIELD, PA 19440 ! - ^ '
NPLSTATUS: Final : SIZEt 8 Acres . . TYPE: Solvents Recovery; Bolts, Nuts. Rivets, and Washers
'01 NA . (F/RP) ] 6/30/97
N
GW; SO
NA j NA -
NA - --'
Data as of May 1995 from EPA CERCLIS and RELAI Databases. See Section 1.8 for a detailed description of these data sources.
Some RA planned start dates have passed; the actual RA start date had not been recorded as of'March 1995. This circumstance may have occurred because (1) the project is
running later than planned or (2) the actual RA start date was recorded after the data were extracted. . '
Abbreviations: . . '
AI
DB
DK
EP
ES
Air
Debris
Unknown
i EPAIn-House
Entire Site
F
FE
FF
GW
LW
EPA Fund-Financed
Federal Enforcement
Federal Facilities
Groundwater
Liquid Waste
MR
MS
NA
NO
OT
Mixed Funding Federal/RP
Man-made Structures
'Not Available :
No Media-
Other
PS
RA
RC
RP
S
PRP Response Under State '
Remedial Actions
RCRA Hazardous Waste
Responsible Party
State, Fund-Financed
SD
si
SL
SO
SR
Sediment '
Single Intake
Sludge
Soil ' . -
PRP Lead Understate
ST
SW -
uxo
. VOCs
Solid Waste
Surface Water
Unexploded Ordnance
Volatile Organic
Compounds
-------
Table 5-5 (continued)
NPL Sites In Pemnsylvank at Which Marketing Opportunities Exist'
Operable Unit
Number Name (Lead)
RA Planned
Start Dat«*
RI/FS
Completed
Media
Volume
Contaminants
Technology
SITE NAME: NORTH PEN N - AREA 5 . EPA ID: PAD980692693 ADDRESS: MAPLE DR; COLMAR, PA 18915
NPL STATUS: Final " SIZE: 20 Acres TYPE: Electrical Equipment and Supplies; Electronic Components
01 NA ' (F/RP)
8/4/97
N
GW
NA
NA
NA
SITENAME: NORTH PENN - AREA 6 ;; EPA ID: PAD980926976 '. ADDRESS: W 3RD ST; LANSDALE. PA 19446 ' :
NPL STATUS; Final' : . . SIZE: 1 Acre . . : TYPE: Meat and Dairy Production; Power Laundries; Metal Heat - .-
' " -" . Treating; Heating Equipment, Except Electric; Metal Coating and
' . . ... ' . ' . . "". -../ :AWed Services; Recycling Waste Oil : ;
01 FUND AND PRP LEAD (F)
02 7 PROPERTIES (RP/FB).
03 . GROUNDWATER (F)
6/30/97
4/01/99
11 0/99
N
.- N
N
SO
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA '
NA
NA
NA -
NA
NA
NA
SITENAME; NORTH PENN - AREA 7 ' - EPA ID; PAD002498632 ' ADDRESS; W1SSAH1CKON AVE; LANSDALE. PA J9446 '
NPL STATUS: Final SIZE: 1 Acre TYPE: Unknown
01 NA (F/RP)
02 NA' '- . (RP)
6/30/98
12/31/97
N
NA
SO
GW
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
SITENAME: NOVAK SANITARY LANDFILL ' EPA ID; PAD079160842 . ADDRESS: -PARKLAND TERRACE RD & LAPP RD; ALLENTOWN, PA
.NPL STATUS: .Final . -, -'--' SIZE: ::. 60 Acres .-"".. . 18104
.-. ;:.'.-.-."' . ...:-=:. - ^ ; > :1: ; v TYPE: Other; Refuse Systems-Co-disposal Landfill
01 NA " (RP/FE)
9/29/97
i
Y
AI; DB; GW; LW;
SD; SO; ST; SW
2,222,000,000 gal.
METALS; VOCs;
OTHER INORGANICS
Monitoring; Natural Attenuation; Disposal of
Residual; Precipitation; Leachate Treatment;
.Pump and Treat at POTW with Discharge; Off-
Site Treatment; Steam Stripping; Surface
Capping Only . .
Data as of May 1995 from EPA CERCLIS and RKLAI Databases See Section 1.8 for a detailed description of these data sources. - . .
* Some RA planned start dates have passed; the actual RA start dale had not been recorded as of March 1995. This circumstance may have occurred because (1) the project is
running later than planned or (2) the actual RA start dale was recorded after the data were extracted.
Abbreviations: .
AI
DB
DK
EP
ES
Air
Debris
Unknown
EPA In-House
Entire Site
F
FE
FF
GW
LW
EPA Fund-Financed
Federal Enforcement
Federal Facilities
Groundwater
Liquid Waste
MR
MS
NA
NO
or
Mixed Funding Federal/RP
Man-made Structures
Not Available
No Media
Other
PS
RA
RC
RP
S
PRP, Response Under Stale
Remedial Actions
RCRA Hazardous Waste
Responsible Party
State, Fund-Financed
SD
SI
SL
SO
. SR
Sediment
Single Intake
Sludge
Soil
PRP Lead Under State
ST
:'SW
UXO
VOCs
Solid Waste '
Surface Water
Unexploded Ordnance
Volatile Organic
Compounds
-------
NPL Sites In Pennsylvania at Which Marketing Opportunities Exist1
-.- Operable Unit , .
Number Name (Lead)
RA Planned
Start Date11
RI/FS
Completed
Media
Volume
Contaminants
i ,
Technology
SITENAME: OCCIDENTAL CHEMICAL CORP./FIRESTONE TIRE EPA ID; PAD980229298 : ADDRESS: ARMAND HAMMER BLVD- POTTSTOWN PA 19464
NPL STATUS: Final ... . . .. : ,;,-,.- -...' _,. v,*;- \,-r ...... .,. ..'. .;:/.. ..., -./.SIZE: : 3Q Acres- :;-, : -. TYPE: : Plastic Resins i > - : " > -'.' ' '" < "
01 NA (RP/F)
6/30/96 .. .
f
Y
GW;SD;.SL;SO
13,000,000 gal;
20,000,000 gal;
22,000,000 gal;
38,000,000 gal;
258,000,000 gal;
7,676,000 gal;
38,000 cy
VOCs '
Air Stripping Technologies; Leachate Treatment;
Pump and Treat at POTW with Discharge; Off-
Site Treatment; Monitoring; Recycling; Pump
and Treatment
SITENAME: - OHIO RIVER PARK EPA ID: PAD980508816 r ADDRESS: GRAND AVE; NEVILLE 'BLAND " PA 15225 ,
HL^lHLl! , ;.._._... ' .SIZE: 32 Acres"" . TYPE: Abandoned - No Use; Refuse Systems-Co-disposal Landfill
01 ^A- -. . ' (RP/FE) j 1/14/98
N
SO
NA . . 1 NA . [NA
SHE NAME: . OLD GITV OF YORK LANDFILL . EPA ID: PAD980692420 * ADDRESS; RD# 1 SOUTH RD; SEVEN VALLEYS, PA 17360
NPL STATUS: Final . SIZE: 176 Acres TYPE: Refuse Systems--Co-disposal Landfill
01 GROUND WATER &
SOIL COVER (RP/FE)
6/30/95
Y
AI;GW;SD;SO;
SW
NA
VOCs; METALS;
OTHER INORGANICS;
PCBs
Monitoring; Air Stripping Technologies; Disposal
of Residual; Off-Site Treatment; Surface Capping
Only; Soil Cover; Pump and Treatment
SITENAME! OSBORNE LANDFILL . ; ': EPA ID: PAD980712673 ADDRESS: 0.5 MILES EOF TOWN; GROVE CITY PA 16127
NPLSTATUS: Fmal, . ..,:./ : ^ : SIZEf 15 Acres :-TYRE:;: :Jndeveloped Land (Incl. fbrests.fields.wettands); Refuse
. _ , - . Systems-Open Dump
02 NA ' (RP/FE) | 12/29/96 ] ; N JGW; SW
NA - " . . - NA . . .jNA
SITE NAME: PALMERTON ZINC PILE EPA ID: PAD002395887 ADDRESS: 211 FRANKLIN ST; PALMERTON, PA 1807 1
NPLSTATUS: .Fjn»l , SIZE: 200 Acres ' TYPE: Recycling Waste Oil; Primary Nonferrou? Metals.; Nonferrqus
v . . ' Foundries
02 NA (RP/F/FE),
03 . . NA - (RP/FE)
. 04 NA . . .- (F/RP)
12/31/96
12/31/97 '...
N
N
9/30/99 ' |N
DB; GW; SD; SO;
SW
NA j NA
MS; SO ,~ NA
GW;SW .
NA
NA .
NA ' . -
Steam Stripping; Monitoring; Surface Capping
Only; Temporary On-Site Storage
NA , ' .- ' '' , ' . x
NA ,
1 Dataasof May 1995 from EPA CERCLIS and RELAI Databases. See Section 1.8 for a detailed description of these data sources.
b Some RA planned start dates have passed; the actual RA start date had not been recorded as of March 1995. This circumstance may have occurred because (1) the project is
running later than planned or (2) the actual RA start date was recorded afler-the data were extracted. - "-"-'. ..''.'-.-
Abbreviations:
AI Air
DB .Debris
DK Unknown
EP EPA In-House
ES Entire Site
F
FE
FF
GW
LW
EPA Fund-Financed
Federal Enforcement
Federal Facilities .'
Groundwater .
Liquid Waste
MR
MS
NA .
NO
OT
Mixed Funding Federal/RP
Man-made Structures
' Not Available
No Media
- Other .'-.-'
PS
RA
RC
RP
S
PRP Response Under State
Remedial Actions " -
RCRA Hazardous Waste
Responsible Party
State, Fund-Financed
SD
SI
SL
SO
SR
Sediment '
Single Intake
Sludge
Soil
PRP Lead Under State
ST
SW
UXO
VOCs
Solid Waste
Surface Water
UnexplAK/il Ordnance -
Volatile Organic "..
Compounds
- - -' ' - .. " .' . "". ... 5-31 . . - ... - . .. J
-------
Table 5-S (continued)
NPL Sites fa Pennsylvania at Which Marketing Opportunities Exist'
Operable Unit
Number Name (Lead)
SITE NAME: PAOL! RAIL YARD
NPL STATUS: Final
01 NA (RP/FE)
RA Flamed
Start Date*
RI/FS
Completed
Media
Volume .
Contaminants
Technology
EPA ID: PAD980692594 , ADDRESS: RR SERVICE SHOP; PAOLI, PA 19301
SIZE: 10 Acres TYPE: Railroads, Lirie-Haut Operating
6/30/96
Y
SITE NAME: PUBLICKBR INDUSTRIES JNC .
NPLSTATUS: Final ' :. :' - ,
03 ' ' SOIL AND GROUND WATER (F) ] 12/30/95 1 NA
AI; DB; GW; LW;
SD; SL; S"0
V
35,000 cy; 3,000 cy;
28,000ft
PCBs; VOCs
Monitoring; Decontamination; Disposal of
Residual; Off-Site Treatment; Recycling;
Leachate Treatment; Steam Stripping; Surface
Capping Only; Solidification and Stabilization;
Pump and Treatment
EPA IDi PAD981939200 ADDRESS! 3223 S DELAWARE AVE; PHILADELPHIA, PA 19148
SIZE! ;: 37 Acres : . TYPE: '- ' NA-':::-::: '.". -.' -:-::/:. ~:\ ;:;. ;;-:; :;' ,: ';/' :'." ' ('/
GW; MS; SD; SO [ NA ' | NA ] NA -
SITE NAME! RECTICON/ALLIED STEEL CORP EPA ID: PAD002353969 ADDRESS: RTE 724 & WELLS RD; PARKER FORD, PA - 19457
NPL' STATUS:: Final " SIZE: SAcres .. TVPEt Nonresidential Building Operators
01 NA (RP/FE)
02 SOIL REMEDIATION (RP)
, 03 - GROUND WATER
REMEDIATION (RP)
6/30/95
12/30/95
12/30/95
Y
NA
NA '
GW; SD; SO
SO
GW
NA
NA
NA
METALS; VOCs
NA
NA
Leachate Treatment; Off-Site Treatment
NA .
NA
SITE NAME;1; 7KESIN DISPOSAL i : ; ' : : : - EPA ID:. : PAD063766828 : r, ADDRESS: TOP OF STILLEY AVE; JEFFERSON BORO, PA 15025
NPLSTATUS: Final ^ jjWi" ' .: : '.-"..-.'. SIZE: 45 Acres: ; . : i- :; ;: r TYPE:; :' Abandoned- No Use
01 NA (PS/FE/RP)
02 NA - (kP/FE)
6/30/95
9/30/97
Y
N
Al; DB; GW; LW;
SD;SO;SW
GW
62,900 cy
*
NA
VOCs; ACID'; DNAPLs;
PLASTICS;
CREOSOTES; OTHER
ORGANICS
NA .
Monitoring; Surface Capping Only; Disposal of
Residual; Pump and Treat at POTW with
Discharge; Off-Site Treatment; Recycling; Steam
Stripping; Leachate Treatment
NA -
SITE NAME: REVERE CHEMICAL CO ' ; EPAIDs/PADOS 1395499 ADDHESS: LONELY COTtAGE ; RpV^O^KAMIXW, PA> 18972: X;S ;
NPLSTATUS: Final.. V.';' ' : ' ; " SIZE: 10 Acres ' TYPE:;' Abandoned :.T No Use. . ''"'-'^: .. ..' .',.'- .-. '.'_.( ;.;.:.;;,:.:.
01 ' NA ' (RP/FE/F)
'02 NA/ . (RP/FE)
12/31/95
5/30/97
Y
N .
DB;MS;RC;SO; i NA
ST .. . - j '
NA JNA
NA
NA .
Vacuum Extraction '
NA .
Data as of May 1995 from EPA CERCLIS and RELAI Databases. See Section 1.8 for a detailed description of these data sources. -
Some RA planned start dates have passed; the actual RA start date had not been recorded as of March 1995.. This circumstance may have occurred because (1) the project is
running later than planned or (2) the actual RA start date was recorded after the data were extracted. . .
Abbreviations: " . .
AI
DB
DK
EP
ES
Air
Debris
Unknown
EPA In-House
Entire Site
F
FE
FF
GW
LW
EPA Fund-Financed
Federal Enforcement
Federal Facilities
Groundwater
Liquid Waste
MR
MS
NA
NO
OT
Mixed Funding Federal/RP
Man-made Structures
Not Available
No Media
Other
PS
RA
RC
RP
S
PRP Response Understate
Remedial Actions
RCRA Hazardous Waste
Responsible Party
State, Fund-Financed
SD
' SI
SL
SO
SR
i
Sediment
Single Intake
Sludge
Soil . - . '
PRP Lead Under State
ST
SW
UXO
VOCs
Solid Waste
Surface .Water
Unexploded Ordnance '
Volatile Organic
Compounds.
-------
NPL Sites in Pennsylvania at Which Marketing Opportunities Exist1
Operable Unit '
Number Name (Lead)
RA Planned
Start Date"
RI/FS
Completed
Media
. Volume
Contaminants'
Technology
SITE NAME: RIVER ROAD LANDFILUWASTEMNGMNT, INC :-y ; :EPA ID: PAD000439083 . ADDRESS: RTE 846 RIVER :RD; SHARPSVILLE. PA 16146- ^ '
NPL STATUS: Final SIZE: 102 Acres TYPE: Abandoned- ;N'O Use; Refuse Systeim^Co^isposal Landfill
01 NA . (RP/FE)
12/28/97
N
SD;.SL
NA
NA
NA
r SITE NAME: RODALE MANUFACTURING CO., INC EPA ID: PAD98 1033285 ' ^ ADDRESS: 6TH & MINOR STS; EMMAUS, PA 18049
NPL STATUS: Final SIZE: 0.1 Acre " TYPE: Unknown
OJ NA ' . (RP/F)
6/30/97
N
GW
NA
NA
NA
SITE NAME; SAEGERTOWN INDUSTRIAL AREA EPA ID: PAD980692487 ADDRESS: GRANT ST; SAEGERTOWN, PA 16433
NPL STATUS: Final. : SIZE: 100 Acres , TYPE: NA
01 GW-P&T.SPARGE. SOIL-
' INCINERATE : (RP/FE)
f ' .
02 LINK TO 01 ROD (RP)
3/31/96
9/30/95
Y
NA
DB; GW; SL; SO
NA
9,000 cy; 9,300,000
gal.; 1,8 18,000 gal.;
9,000 cy
NA
VOCs
NA
Decontamination; Incineration with On-Sile
Disposal of Residual; Off-Site Treatment;
Solidification and Stabilization; Air Stripping
Technologies; Disposal of Residual; Leachate
Treatment; Recycling; Steam Stripping; Thermal
Treatment with On-Site Placement; Monitoring
NA .-..-..
SITE NAME: SHRIVER'S CORNER EPA ID: PAD980830889 ADDRESS: RD #6 ALONG RTE 394; GETTYSBURG PA 17325
NPLSTATUS: Final - . .-'.'"- : ' .. . SIZE: . :: 10 Acres : . TYPE: -' :: Unknown . -: ^i ' '. '.-.;: .'.;' : -: ' '? ' "' ! < .;-.,
01 GROUNDWATER & SOIL (RP/FE)
7/27/97
N
GW; SO
NA
NA
NA :
SITE NAME: STANLEY KESSLER , ...''... EPA ID: PAD014269971 ADDRESS: i03 QUEENS DR; KING OF PRUSSIA, PA 19406
NPL STATUS::, Final. Vl X - .-. : \ - ' . "- . ':--.-v.' , '. SIZE: ' :2:AcreS- '. J' - . TYPE: : Recycling;Wastebil " ;; - V ; -.:' .-
01 NA (F/RP) ] 9/30/96 J Y
GW
NA :NA . .
Pump and Treatment; Institutional Controls
SITE NAME: STRASBURG LANDFILL EPA ID: PAD000441337 ADDRESS: STRASBURoSDYNEWLINW^
NPL.STATUS: Final SIZE: 22 Acres TYPE::: - ;;:Aban^b^
01 -CAP & LEACHATE
. COL. SYSM (F/RP)
12/30/95 .
Y
AI; DB; GW; LW;
SD; SO
NA
VOCs
Monitoring; Surface Capping Only; Disposal of
Residual; Thermal Treatment with On-Site
Placement ' ^.
Dataasof May 1995 from EPA CERCLIS and RELAI Databases. .See Section 1.8 for a detailed description of these data sources. ' "
Some RA planned start dates have passed; the actual RA start date had not been recorded as of March 1995. This circumstance may have occurred because (1) the project is
running later than planned or (2) the actual RA start date was recorded after the data were extracted. .. , .'.:''. ' . ' ,
Abbreviations: - .
AI
DB
DK
EP
ES
Air
Debris
-Unknown
.EPA In-House
Entire Site
F
FE
FF
GW
LW
EPA Fund-Financed
Federal Enforcement
Federal Facilities
Groundwater
Liquid Waste
MR
MS
NA
NO
OT
, Mixed Funding. Federal/RP
Man-made Structures
Not Available
No Media
. Other
PS
RA
RC
RP
S
PRP Response Under State
Remedial Actions
RCRA Hazardous Waste1
.Responsible Party
State, Fund-Financed
SD
SI
SL
SO
SR
Sediment - ,
Single Intake
Sludge
Soil
PRP Lead Under State
ST Solid Waste
SW. Surface Water
UXO Unexploded Ordnance
VOCs Volatile Organic
Compounds
' .. ' .' . -. ; '. " 5-33. .-. ,-.: - . -..:-: . " ^
-------
Table 5-5 (continued)
NPL Sites In Pennsylvania at Which Marketing Opportunities Exist'
Operable Unit
Number . Name (Lead)
RA Planned
Start Date*
RI/FS
Completed
Media
Volume
Contaminant*
Technology
SITE NAME: TOBYHANNA ARMY DEPOT EPA ID: PA5213820892 . ADDRESS: ATTN SDSTO-AF-E; TOBYHANNA, PA 18466
NPL STATUS! Final SIZE! 1,408 Acres TYPE: Misc.; Industrial Equipment; Sanitary Services-Waslewaier
. - : Treatment Plant; Water Supp!y-GroundwaterSupply
01 SOIL AND GROUNDWATER (FF)
02 COAL PILE (FF)
03 RCRA CLOSURE AREAS OF
CONCERN (FF)
04 VERIF STUD FIRST 11
AREA CON. _(FP).
06 OAKES SWAMP (FF)
07 BARNEY'S LAKE (FF)
08 INACTIVE LANDFILL (FF)
SITE NAME:. TONOLLICORP ,
NPL STATUS: Final
0.1 NA (RP/FE)
12/31/96
12/31/97
12/31/96
6/30/97
6/30/98
6/30/98
6/30/98
12/30/95
N'
N
N
N
N
.N
N
Y
SITE NAME: TYSONS DUMP
NPL STATUS: Final .
03 . NA (RP/FE)
9/30/96
Y (FS)
GW;SO
SW
OT
DK
NA
NA
NA'
NA
NA
NA
NA.
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA '
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
EPA ID: PAD073613663 ADDRESS: RTE 54; NESQUEHONING, PA 18240 ;
SIZE: :/ 20 Acres .. TYPE: . Abandoned r" No Use . ::;;... ,:: .->
.AI; DB; GW; MS;
SD; SL; SO
39,000 cy
EPA ID: PAD980692024
SIZE: 5 Acres
GW;SW
NA
METALS
Monitoring', Off-Site Treatment;
Decontamination; Recycling; Disposal of
Residual; Chemical Treatment; Surface Capping
Only; PH Neutralization, Other Neutralization;
Solidification and Stabilization ,
ADDRESS: UNOBTAINABLE; UPPER MERION TWP, PA 19406 y ";
TYPE: Abandoned - No Use r :i -;?..,
VOCs
Off-Site Treatment; Monitoring
SITE NAME- UGI COLUMBIA GAS PLANT ^ : - r - : ;: r : : ' " : ' : EPA ID: PAD980539126 ADDRESS: S FRONT & MILL $TS; COLUMBIA, PA 17512
NPL STATUS: Final1 ^"v - r^ . - ' ' ' 'SIZE: 1.5 Acres TYPE: NA
01 NA (SR/FE)] 3/31/99 .
N .
NA NA-
NA '
NA
Data as of May 1995 from EPA CERCLIS and RELAI Databases. See Section.1.8 for a detailed description of these data sources.
Some RA planned start dates have passed; the actual RA start date had not been recorded as of March 1995. This circumstance may have occurred because (1) the project is
running later 'than planned or (2) the actual RA start date was recorded after the data were extracted. . .
Abbreviation*!- - - - ' -
AI"
DB
DK
EP
ES
Air
Debris
Unknown
EPA In-House
Entire Site
F
FE
FF
GW
LW
EPA Fund-Financed
Federal Enforcement
Federal Facilities
Groundwater
Liquid Waste
MR
MS
" NA
NO
OT
Mixed Funding Federal/RP
Man-made Structures
Not Available
No Media
Other
PS
RA
RC
RP
S
PRP Response Under State
Remedial Actions
RCRA Hazardous Waste
Responsible Party
State, Fund-Financed
SD
SI
SL
SO
SR
i
Sediment
Single Intake
.Sludge
Soil
PRP Lead Under State
ST
SW
UXO
VOCs
Solid Waste
Surface Water
Unexploded Ordnarice
Volatile Organic
Compounds
-------
NFL Sites in Pennsylvania at Which Marketing Opportunities Exist1
Operable Unit
Number - -. " Name (Lead)
RA Planned
Start Date11
RI/FS
Completed
Media.
Yolume
. .
."
Contaminants
.
Technology
SITE NAME: WELSH LANDFILL . EPA ID: PAD980829527 ' ADDRESS: WALSH JRD;iffQNEYBROOK,PX 19344 ?.
NPL STATUS: Final - , ' SIZE: 8 Acres .';... TYPE: ; Tire Retreading and Repair Shops; Recycling Waste Oil; Other;
' --: < ~- ' ' :;---.-": -(- ',./- ;y- / '--.,.. jf .-:V|^se:$y^^
01 LANDFILL CAP (S/F)
04 . NA -- (F/RP)
6/30/96
6/30/99
Y
N
DB;GW;SD;SO;
ST
DK
NA .
NA
METALS; VOCs
NA ' '
Monitoring; Surface Capping Only
NA
SITENAME: WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRONIC: (SHARON PLANT) : : v ; " ' : i ; EPA ID^ PAD005000575 : ADDRESS: 46ft SHARPSVILLEAVE; SHARON, PA iiSl46 V ?:
NPLSTATUS: Final : ; :y ; : :' ' V :.: ; - -A -,.\, ' - kp ' ; /- ' SIZE: "..: 50 Acres ''.- '.;-.. TYPE: v General Warehousing and Storagk-.f. /';"' '--:';::: "..'.
01 THE SITE (EXCLUDING LNAPL) .
9/28/98 1
GW
NA . ' * " NA . . NA . '
SITENAME: WESTINGHOUSE ELEVATOR CO, PLANT EPA ID: PAD043882281 ADDRESS: 1200 BIGLERSVJLLE RD, RTE 34 N; GETTYSBURG, PA
NPLSTATUS: Final . SIZE: 85 Acres 17325
* TYPE; Industrial Equipment
01 NA (PS/FE/RP)
6/30/96
N
GW; LW
NA .
VOCs;DNAPLs
'-.
~
.-,
. Monitoring; Air Stripping Technologies; Disposal
of Residual; Leachate Treatment; Off-Site -
Treatment; Recycling; Pump and Treatment ,
SITENAME: WHITMOYER LABORATORIES . EPA ID: PAD003005014 ' ADDRESS: 19 N RAILROAD ST; MYERSTOWN, PA 17067
NPLSTATUS: Final. ' .. . SIZE: 175 Acres . TYPE; Abandoned -. No Use . ;. _ .
02 NA . (F/RP)
.03 NA . (F/RP)
04 NA '.- ' (RP)
6/30/95
.
12/31/97
12/31/95 .'
05-.. NA ..' . ' (RP) 16/30/96
06 NA (RP) 6/30/96
Y (FS)
Y(FS)
NA
, NA
- NA
DB;LW;MS;SI; .
SL;ST
S " * -
DB; GW; SD; SO
NA -'
NA . .
NA ; - . .
230,900 gal.^ 20,402
gal.; 919,100 gal.;
4,848,000 gal.; 747
cy . .
121,000cy
NA;
NA
NA
METALS; VOCs
METALS; VOCs;
CREOSOTES; DNAPLs;
OTHER ORGAN1CS
NA ..'..-
.NA -
NA
Incineration with On-Site Disposal of Residual;
Off-Site .Treatment; Incineration and Disposal;
Solidification and Stabilization;
Other/Unknowh/Undeterinined Technology
Off-Site Treatment; Disposal of Residual;.
Monitoring; .Biodegradation and Bioremediation
.Treatment; Solidification and Stabilization; Pump
and Treatment
NA '
NA .' , . '
NA / ^ ' . - ';-.
Data as of May 1995 from EPA CF.RQLIS and Rl-l.AI Databases. See Section 1.8 for a detailed description of these data sources.
Some RA planned start dates have passed, the actual RA start date had not been recorded as of.March 1995. This circumstance may have occurred because (1) the project is
running later than planned or (2) the actual RA siarl dale wa* recorded after (he data were extracted.
Abbreviations: , ' , ' . - . - .
AI
DB
DK
EP
ES
Air
Debris
Unknown
EPA Iri-House
Entire Site
F
FE
FF
GW
LW
EPA Fund-Financed
- Federal Enforcement
Federal Facilities
Groundwater
" Liquid Waste
MR
MS
NA
NO
OT
Mixed Funding Federal/RP
Man-made Structures
Not Available
No Media
Other
PS
RA
RC
RP
S
" PRP Response Under State
Remedial Actions
RCRA Hazardous Waste
Responsible Party .
State, Fund-Financed-
SD
SI.
SL
SO
SR
Sediment '
Single Intake
Sludge
Soil
PRP Lead Under State
ST .
SW
UXO
VOCs
Solid Waste "
Surface Water
Unexploded Ordnance .
Volatile Organic -
Compounds
5-35
-------
Table 5-5 (continued)
NPL Sites In Pennsylvania at Which Marketing Opportunities Exist'
Operable Unit
Number Name (Lead)
SITE NAME: WILLIAM- DICK LAGOONS
NPL STATUS: Final
01 NA (RP/FB/F)
'02 NA (RP)
03 NA (RP/FE)
RA Planned
Start Dale"
RI/FS
Completed
Media
Volume
Contaminants
" Technology
EPA ID: PAD980537773 ADDRESS: TELEGRAPH RD; W CALN TWP, PA 19376
SIZE: , 10 Acres TYPE: Abandoned- No Use
1/30/96
7/30/96
2/28/97
Y
NA
Y (FS)
GW; OT; SO
GW;SO
SO
NA
NA.
24,000 cy
METALS; VOCs;
DNAPLs; PLASTICS;
OTHER ORGANICS
NA
METALS; PESTICIDES/
HERBICIDES; VOCs
Disposal of Residual; Monitoring; Pump and
Treatment
NA
Soil Cover; Disposal of Residual; Leachate
Treatment; Off-Site, Treatment; Thermal
Treatment with On-Site Placement
SITE NAME: YORK COUNTY SOLID WASTE/REFUSE LANDFILL EPA ID: PAD980830715 ADDRESS: RD 03 - BOX 426; HOPEWELL TWP, PA 17363
NPL STATUS: Final . - SIZE: 100 Acres TYPE: Abandoned - No Use; Refuse Systems-Co-disposal Landfill
Of NA - (PS/FE/RP) 1 8/12/96
. Y [GW
NA
NA ;
Institutional Controls; Pump and Treatment .
Data as of May 1995 from EPA CERCLIS and RELAI Databases. See Section 1.8 for a detailed description of these data sources.
Some RA planned start dates have passed; the actual RA start date had not been recorded as of March 1995. This circumstance may have occurred because (1) the project is
running later than planned or (2) the actual RA start date was recorded after the data were extracted.
Abbreviations: . . , '
Al
DB
DK .
EP
ES
Air
Debris
Unknown
EPA In-House
Entire Site
F
FE
FF
GW
LW
EPA Fund-Financed
Federal Enforcement
Federal Facilities
Groundwater
Liquid Waste
MR
MS
NA
NO
OT
Mixed Funding Federal/RP
Man-made Structures
Not Available
No Media ;
Other
PS.
RA
RC
RP
S
PRP Response Understate
Remedial Actions
RCRA Hazardous Waste
Responsible Party
State, Fund-Financed
,SD
SI
SL
SO
SR
i
Sediment
Single Intake
Sludge
Soil
PRP Lead Under State
ST
SW
UXQ
VOCs
Solid Waste
Surface Water
Unexplbded Ordnance .
Volatile Organic
Compounds
-------
Table 5-6
RCRA Facilities in Pennsylvania Currently Undergoing Corrective Action3
SITE NAME- . '. . ...--:.'"
MAILING ADDRESS
-AMERICAN COLOR & CHEM CORP
MT VERNON ST ' '. " ' '
LOCK HAVEN, PA 17745
AMP INC , '
RD2, PO BOX 247 . '
GLEN ROCK, PA 17237-9802 '
ATLANTIC REFINING AND MARKETING CORP
3144 PASS YUNK AVE
PHILADELPHIA, PA 19145
CHEMCLENE CORPORATION
258 N PHOENIXVILLE PIKE
MALVERN.PA 19355 - . .
LANCASTER METALS SCIENCE CORP
POBOX86 , : ,
EAST PETERSBURG, PA 17520
EPA ID
PAD003047792
PAD041421223
PAD002289700
PADO 14353445
PAD082434747 . .
SWMU AND UNIT NAMES v .:'= ; .'.=:' -^- - ' . :
ENTIRE FACILITY.
ENTIRE FACILITY
LAND TREATMENT
ENTIRE FACILITY
AREA4&7 ; '
ENTIRE FACILITY
Data as of May 1995 from the EPA RCRIS database.. See Section 1.8 for a detailed description of data sources.
5-37
-------
THIS PAGE IS INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
5-38
-------
6.0 DEMAND FOR REMEDIATION OF SITES IN VIRGINIA
This section is organized into six sections. The first section discusses the authority and organization
.of the Virginia Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ). The second and third-sections discuss
the market at sites addressed through the Federal Superfund program and Federal:Resource
' Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) corrective action sites respectively. The fourth section
discusses opportunities at underground storage tank (UST) sites managed by'Virginia. The fifth
section reviews the market at Department of Defense-(DoD) sites in Virginia.- The sixth section
presents a brief discussion of other useful information about the market for innovative technologies in
. Virginia. , . ,
Figure 6-1 presents a map of Virginia that
indicates the locations of. sites in the State
that are listed on the NPL, while Figure 6-2
presents the RCRA facilities in the State1.
NPL sites and RCRA facilities are evenly
distributed across Virginia.
Some innovative technology use has
occurred at Superfund NPL sites in
Virginia. According to the .Innovative
Treatment Technologies: Annual Status
Report (Seventh Edition), technologies selected
Summary Information
The State does not have a program to manage
abandoned hazardous waste sites. The U.S;
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)
manages an inventory of 18 Superfund
National Priorities List (NPL) sites at .which
remediation activities have not' yet begun.
Ten RCRA facilities are under a requirement
to conduct a RCRA facility investigation
(RFI). Current data on USTs indicate that .38
UST sites in the State are in need of cleanup.
There are currently 243 sites at 27 Dob
installations at which cleanup activities are -
planned. ' ,,' .:. '>-'-.
include soil vapor extraction and thermal desorption.
6.1 The Virginia Hazardous Waste Management Program
Virginia operates its hazardous-waste management program under the Waste Management Act
(Virginia Code § 10.1-1400 - 10.1-1457 as amended). That legislation is the authority under which
the State operates the RCRA base program. The Air, Water, and Waste Management Program of
Figures 6-1 and 6-2 do not indicate the locations of all NPL sites or all RCRA facilities
located in Virginia. LandView IP* contains information from the Comprehensive^
Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Information System (CERCLIS) on
NPL sites and other sites'. It also contains information from the Biennial Reporting System
(BRS) on treatment; storage, and disposal facilities and major generators of hazardous waste.
6-1
-------
N
tr
Arlington
Norfolk
Source: Modified from LandView II, based
on data as of September 1994. , Not to Scale
Figure 6-1
NPL Sites in Virginia
6-2
-------
N
It
Arlington
** *"
Source: Modified from LaridView II, based
on data as of September 1994. Not to Scale
Figure 6-2
RCRA Facilities in Virginia
6-3
-------
DEQ is responsible for managing the RCRA base program. Virginia does not have Federal authority
to operate the RCRA corrective action program, nor is there a similar State program. However, State
staff do assist EPA staff with inspection activities under RCRA. Currently, there are approximately
25 staff working on hazardous waste issues at the State's regional offices and headquarters (PRC
' 19951). Virginia no longer has-a program to manage abandoned hazardous waste sites, but they are
inventorying abandoned waste sites (PRC 1995y).
The Virginia DEQ Water Division administers the UST Program in Virginia. Virginia's,UST
regulations expand on the Federal regulations by:
Regulating all heating oil tanks of a capacity of less than 5,000 gallons
Requiring notification by owners of USTs that remain in the ground, but were taken
' out of service before January 1, 1974 .
Creating the Virginia Petroleum Storage Tanks Fund for cleanups and third-party
claims '-'
Allowing the UST Owners arid Operators Fund to demonstrate financial responsibility
for corrective action and third-party liability for the Federal $500,000-$! million per
occurrence and $l-$2 million annual aggregate financial assurance requirements.
The management organization of the program consists of the headquarters office of the DEQ UST
program in Richmond and six regional offices. (Office addresses are provided in.Section 6.6.) The
central office is responsible for policy development, database management, and tank registration and
compliance. The regional offices are responsible for the implementation of the program.
DEQ is now in the process of establishing a Voluntary Remediation Program (VRP) to begin
addressing abandoned sites in the State. The purpose of the VRP is to promote timely remediation of
waste sites that might not otherwise receive any formal oversight and provide a mechanism for
contaminated properties to return to an economically productive state. The voluntary .remediation
legislative bill was passed by the Virginia General Assembly in the Spring of 1995. According to the
statute, eligible participants include "persons who own, operate, or have a security interest in or who
have entered into contract for the purchase of contaminated property to voluntarily remediate
hazardous substances, hazardous waste, solid waste, or petroleum." . ,
6-4
-------
DEQ will promulgate regulations on the program by July 1997 with provisions that the candidate sites
are not under any other regulatory, jurisdiction. The program is how operating on an interim process,
administered .on a case-by-case basis. This interim program is comprised of an application, an
agreement, a registration fee, remedial investigation, corrective measures study, corrective measure
implementation, remedial completion report, and a satisfactory completion of remediation
.' - -. ' ' ' '* " ' "".-
certification. The application is a formal statement pf intent which includes the site history. The -
application is non-binding; however, it establishes the relationship between DEQ and the participant.
There is. a registration fee to defray the cost of the program which is not to exceed the lesser of
$5,000 or one percent of the total cost of remediation. The remedial investigation identifies the waste
units and characterizes any releases (constituents, extent, and magnitude). The corrective measures .
study outlines the remediation standards (endpoint determination) and remediatipn technology. Once
the corrective measures study is approved, implementation of the plan occurs. When the
implementation is completed, a final report .with a project summary, confirmation of sampling results,
and any administrative requirements outlined in the original plan is required.; Upon DEQ acceptance
of the completion report, the State issues a "Certification of Satisfactory Completion of Remediation."
This certification constitutes an immunity for the recipient to enforcement action under State law. r
v - '.'''.'* - ' '
6.2 The Market at Abandoned Sites Managed Under the Federal Superfund Program
EPA has: listed 24 sites in Virginia on the NPL. Table 6-1 provides a summary1 of the current status
of NPL sites in Virginia', including the number of remedial investigations and feasibility studies
(RI/FS), remedial designs (RD), remedial actions (RA), and removals that are planned, in progress,
or complete. Table 6-2, found at the end of the section, provides information on the individual
NPL sites in Virginia at which marketing opportunities exist.
Of the 24 NPL sites, in Virginia, remedial action has not yet started at 18 of the sites; Fourteen of
the 18 sites are in the pre-design phase. These sites present the best opportunities for innovative
technology vendors because technologies have riot yet been selected. Even at those sites where a
remedy has been selected but no technology vendor has been chosen, some market opportunities may '
exist. Six of these sites are located at DoD installations and are included in Table 6-1, however, they
are discussed in more detail in Section 6.5. The discussion in this section focuses on the 12 non-
Federal NPL sites.
6-5
-------
Table 6-1
Number of Sites and Operable Units at Federal NPL Sites in Virginia :
Phase of Activity ; ;:v.
Number of Sites ;
'';.Number:of;,v-' ' ^
. ' O^eraBfe Units ''< ': ":'; :.'
Remedial Investigations/Feasibility Studies ." "~ :v-':;:'.'v v;X:y:':'':'' ;!.:'':. '"
Planned
In Progress
Complete (RD not started)
8
12
. 3
. 18 - '
'23
3
Remedial Designs,, ' ' " -;':'.-' , . ''-. ',.. ; ;.';;. * :" ,, ''.^:-:'\: -\-l-,'. '
Planned
In Progress
Complete (RA not started)
14
.5 . .
r
29 '
5
1
Remedial Actions : .;,; , .''-. . . .
Planned
In Progress
Complete
18
10
" 5
34
12
8
Removals, ' : . '." " ' " , ';:;;- <;:'". ' " ' :'-/'''. ' ." '' ;;; ;li?f 'v:, '."'.'. *''-'^?::; . ^.f; :., "' ;
Started
Complete
12
11
12
.11
Source: Data as of May 1995 from EPA CERCLIS database; see Section 1.8 for a detailed description of .the data sources.
Contaminants and contaminated media identified at the sites include metals in soils, sludge, and;
groundwater; volatile organic compounds (VOC) and pesticides in soil, surface water, and
groundwater; polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons (PAH) and pplynuclear aromatics (PNA) in soil,
sludge, refuse, and groundwater; and polychlofinated biphenyls (PCB) and dioxin in soils and surface
water. According to the Innovative Treatment Technologies: Annual Status Report (Seventh Edition),
innovative technologies selected include thermal desorption and soil vapor extraction. Figure 6-3
presents the data available on the distribution of sizes of the NPL sites in Virginia. The sites range in
size from 1 to 321 acres. More than 75 percent of the sites for which data are available are less than
50 acres in area.
6-6
-------
Figure 6-3
NPL Site Size Distribution in Virginia
<1-50 51-100 101-200 201-300
Acres
>301
Not Available
6.3 The Market at RCRA Corrective Action Sites
Although Virginia is authorized to issue RCRA Part B hazardous waste management permits for
hazardous waste facilities, it is not authorized to administer the .corrective action program; all
corrective action activities are managed by EPA Region 3. Virginia does not have a separate State-
mandated corrective action program for operating hazardous waste facilities. Data from the Resource
Conservation and Recovery Information System (RCRIS) database indicate there are 98 RCRA
treatment, storage," and disposal (TSD) facilities in the State: 48 land disposal units, -8 incinerators,
and 64 storage and treatment units2. Ten of the RCRA facilities currently require corrective action.
The definition, of requiring corrective action used here is that a facility has been required to perform a
CMS. Table 6-3, found at the end of this section, lists facilities, with their mailing addresses, that
are scheduled to undergo corrective action in the future. The number of facilities with a CMS .
imposed is not a direct subset of RCRA TSD facilities, instead it is a subset of TSD facilities and
hazardous waste generators. While TSD facilities are statutorily required to address corrective, action,
EPA has discretionary authority to mpose corrective action on generators. In 9 of the 10 cases, the
2 A facility may be included in more than one of these categories.
' ' . '. ' :" " . '' 6-7 '. .
-------
entire facility is listed as subject to CMS; at one site a requirement for a CMS was imposed for
groundwater. Most of the facilities house manufacturing operations. One military installation, Naval
Air Station Oceana (NAS Oceana) and two oil refineries also are on the list.
Data were available in RCRIS for only one facility that indicate the media contaminated
(groundwater); in ho case did RCRIS have data identifying contaminants for the sites in Virginia.
Names of the solid waste management unit (SWMU) identified in RCRIS do not, in this case, give
any indication of the nature of the contamination. However, given the types of facilities identified in .
RCRIS - oil refineries and storage facilities and a military installation,- it is reasonable to assume ,
that the contaminants of concern would include oil and other petroleum products, solvents (both .
chlorinated and nonchlorinated), and metals; however, not all the facilities will have all the
contaminants. Given that a requirement for a CMS has been imposed, it also is reasonable to assume
that, at a minimum, there is contaminated soil present at all 10 facilities.
In addition, 10 facilities are under a requirement to conduct a RCRA facility investigation (RFI). The
number of facilities with an RFI imposed is not a direct subset of the RCRA TSD facilities, instead it
is a subset of TSD facilities and hazardous waste generators. While TSD facilities are statutorily
required to address corrective action, EPA has discretionary authority to impose corrective action on
generators. As discussed in Section 1.2, these facilities may also provide either a long-term
opportunity or near-term opportunity where no CMS is necessary to begin corrective action or
corrective activity begins in accordance, with the stabilization initiative..
6A The Market at UST Sites Managed by the State , .
/
The DEQ administers the State program governing USTs. Virginia has.40,312 active tanks, the
second largest number in Region 3. Active tanks are defined as tanks still in service (EPA 1995e).
Confirmed releases have occurred at about 16 percent of those tanks. As of July 1995, Virginia has
reported to EPA's Office of Underground Storage Tanks (OUST) 6,617 confirmed sites. Cleanup has
yet to be initiated at 38 of those sites. Table 6-4 below provides information on the number of UST
sites in Virginia. ' .
6-8
-------
Table 6-4
Underground Storage Tank Corrective
Action Measures in Virginia as of Third Quarter FY95
Active
Tanks
40,312 '
Tanks'- ;,_,';
Closed ':''::7f'':,
..- 28,986
;. Confirmed ,
Releases;1;;, ;
6,617
Cleanups
Initiated
6,579 -
Cleanups
Completed
5,373 " II
The number of USTs identified as opportunities for vendors of innovative technologies will change
rapidly because of the combination of rapid increases in the number of confirmed releases and " .
continuing site closures. In national studies by EPA in 1991 and 1992, it was found that the
majority, or about 87 percent, of the tanks are used to manage gasoline or diesel fuel, kerosene, and
heating oil. Of the remaining USTs, 13 percent manage other materials and wastes, such as used oil
(4 percent), hazardous material (2 percent), and other material (5 percent) or are empty (2 percent).
The majority of the contamination problems are related to the contamination of soils and groundwater
with petroleum products that contain VOCs and semivolatile organic compounds (SVOC) (EPA . .
1992a, 1992b). ' . , ' ,,
6.5 The Market at Federal Facility Sites in Virginia ,
... - ' ., , /.'.-.., '
As is the case with all of the other states in Region 3, there are no Department of Energy (DOE)
' - . ' - ' . ' i ' - . - ' V
facilities in the State where remedial actions are planned. There are 27 active DoD installations and
formerly used defense sites (FUDS) in Virginia that currently require remedial activities. At those
installations, there are 468 active sites. Of those 468 active sites, DoD currently plans remedial ,
actions at 243 of those sites.. The total number of sites to be remediated may exceed that figure
because DoD has not yet completed assessment activities at all the installations.
The Defense Environmental Restoration Program Annual Report to Congress for Fiscal Year 1994
(DERP report) estimates that a total of about $686 million in funding is needed through the year 2020
in all. phases of the cleanup process at the 27 installations. The bulk of those funds ($128 million) is
allocated to Naval Weapons Station Yorktown, with the smallest amount allocated to Cameron Station
($1.443 million).' Most of the sites at which remediation is planned are at the .remedial investigation
and feasibility study (RI/FS) stage.
6-9
-------
Six of the DoD installations in Virginia have sites listed on the NPL. At those installations,
approximately $392 million in funding is estimated to be needed through' the year 2015 for
remediation activities. Currently, 127 sites at the six installations are scheduled for remedial action.
Because sites identified by DoD in the DERP report are not the same as operable units under the
NPL, it is impossible to determine what fraction of the funds is slated for NPL sites at the six "
installations.
An understanding of the typical activities performed -at DoD installations supports the assumption that
the majority of contaminants at the sites for which remediation currently is planned fall into one of
three broad categories:, petroleum, oils, and lubricants (POL), VOCs,.qr metals. In addition,
pesticides, PAHs, and PCBs also have been identified at the six NPL sites. Table 6-2, found at the
end of the section, provides specific information on the DoD NPL sites. The. contaminants
mentioned above are found in the soil at all the sites and in the groundwater at a large'percentage of
the sites. Data on the volumes of soil and groundwater to be treated are not available. Table 6-5
provides information on the individual installations and sites subject to remediation at these
installations. Staff at each installation determine the individual sites at which they plan to perform
remedial actions. Additional sites may already have cleanup underway; those sites have not been
included in the table because it is unlikely that they-will afford opportunities to vendors of innovative
technologies.
Table 6-5
DoD Installations and Sites in Virginia at Which Cleanup is Planned2
, Name, Address,
and Outyear Funding ($000)
Army Research Laboratory -
Woodbridge
Outyear Funding FY95-1997
53,655
Cameron Station - Alexandria
Outyear Funding FY95-2020
51,443
Fort Belvoir
22060-5000
Outyear Funding FY95-2002
52,297
Federal Facility
Identification
Number
VA321002098100
VA32 10020 13900 '
VA3210020082QO
Codesb
A -
A .
A
Number of Sites at
""'.'. 'Which;,'"' , ..";.-.
Cleanup is Planned
0
2
1
6-10
-------
Table 6-5 (continued)
DoD Installations and Sites in Virginia
at Which Cleanup is Planned3
Name, Address,
and Outyear Funding ($000) "
Fort Eustis
23604-5015
Outyear Funding FY95-20 10
". $32,912
Fort Lee
23801-5000 ,
Outyear Funding FY95-2005
$8,246 '- -.. .
Fort Myer
22211-5050
Outyear Funding FY95-2002
' $1,023
Fort Story
23459-5000
Outyear Funding FY95-2005
$9,118 .
Radford Army Ammunition Plant
Outyear Funding FY95-20 10
' $40,523 . : ' '
Vint Hill Farms Station
Warrenton 22186-5013
Outyear Funding FY95-1998
$10,940
Arlington Service Center
Outyear Funding FY95-2003
$2,848 ' "
Chesapeake NSGA NWest
Chesapeake 23322-5000
Outyear Funding FY95-2003-
' ;$1,611 ' ,
Command Naval Base Norfolk
Outyear Funding FY95-2005
$45,346
Craney Island FISC
Outyear Funding FY95-2015
$21,618 ' . '
; Federal Facility
Identification
; : Number
VA32 1002032 100
YA32 1002050200
VA321002062600
VA321002087500
VA321002073000
VA321002093100
VA3 17009003200
VA3 17002726700
VA3 17006 146300
VA3 17009000500
Codes?
. ; A, N . .
A ' - .
;A
A
A .; .
A
' A '
A
'A
'A;',:
Number of Sites at
Which
Cleanup is Planned.
9
"; . . 6
0 '
-.'.' 4 "
10
22
. " 3
.'.I..-
14
.8
6-11
-------
Table 6-5 (continued)
DoD Installations and Sites in Virginia.
at Which Cleanup is Planned3 r
Name, Address, ;,...
and Outyear Funding ($000)
Dahlgreen NSWC-
22448-5000
Outyear Funding FY95-2010
$26,753
Naval Air Station Oceana
Virginia Beach 23460-5012
Outyear Funding FY95-2005
$32.402
Naval Amphibious Base Little Creek
Norfolk 23521-5000
Outyear Funding FY95-2003
$19,474
Naval Radio Station Driver
Outyear Funding FY95-2003
$6,645
Naval Shipyard Norfolk
Portsmouth 23709-5000
Outyear Funding FY95-2105
1 $57,378
Naval Weapons Station Yorktown
Outyear Funding FY95-2007
$128,297
Quantico MCCDC
Quantico 22134-5000
Outyear Funding FY95-2005
$93,253
Williarasburg FISC Cheatham Annex
Outyear Funding FY95-2011
$8,252
Yorktown FISC Fuels Division
Outyear Funding FY95-2003
$9,474
Byrd Air National Guard Base
Outyear Funding FY95-2005
$4,550
Federal Facility
Identification
Number
VA3 17002468400
VA3 17002460600
VA3 17002248200
VA3 1700225 1600
VA317002481300
VA3 17002417000
VA3 17302472200
VA3 17002460500
VA317009001700
VA357282490400
Codes!?
A, N
A
. A-
A
A
A, N ;
. A, N
A -'
A
A .
Number of Sites at
Which
: Cleanup is Planned
52
10
\
\
. .. 4
2
1
39
. 8
' 3
1
'4
6-12
-------
Table 6-5 (continued)
DoD Installations and Sites in Virginia
at Which Cleanup is Planned2
'lr .V.;;' Name, Address, ' ,' ';
and Outyear Funding ($000)
Langley Air Force Base
23665-5000
Outyear Funding FY95-2004
$75,177
DGSC Richmond
Outyear Funding FY95-20 15
$35,167
Nansemond Ordnance Depot STP
Outyear Funding FY95-2008 ;
$5,567 . .- .
Virginia State Fuel Farm
Outyear Funding FY95-2008
$2,470. .'"/':'
AH Other Installations
$27,505 '
Federal Facility
Identification
Number
VA357212447700
:<
VA397 152075 100 <
VA39799F156800
VA39799F 16880 -
\ -" '
- Codes6
:A, N
A, N
F "
F .
.
Number of Sites at
Which
Cleanup is Planned.
16
11
' , 2, . . ,
A
' 4
- '
Source: Defense Environmental Restoration Program Annual Report to Congress for Fiscal Year 1994
a Includes installations with funding for cleanup of more than $1 million and with three or more active sites.
'b Codes: ' ;' , ' ' . " . ."..' '. '''. . ,'.....:
A = The installation is currently active and covered by Defense Environmental Restoration Account (DERA) funds.
F = The installation is no longer active and is managed by the FUDS Branch. ' , . .
N == The site is listed on the final National Priorities List. . ^ .
616 Further Market Information for Virginia .
A vendor that wishes to bid on any State contract must request .a vendor application from the ,
- Department of Purchase and Supply at (804) 786-6152. The vendor .uses that form to register in the
State as a vendor interested in bidding on state procurements. A vendor can learn about upcoming
procurements from newspapers.
6-13
-------
A vendor that wishes to obtain information about sites in Virginia that are managed by EPA may
write to:
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Regions .
841 Chestnut Building . . .
Philadelphia, PA 19107 . . -
For information on RCRA'facilities, the envelope should be marked to the attention of the Freedom
of Information Act Officer, Office of RCRA Programs. For information on Comprehensive
Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA) facilities, the envelope should
be marked to the attention of the Freedom of Information Act Officer, Office of Superfund Programs.
The requestor will be billed-for the information, depending on the volume of information.
Those interested hi inquiring about the Voluntary Remediation Program (VRP) should contact:
Kevin Green
Virginia Department of Environmental Quality
Waste Division.
629 East Main Street
Richmond, VA 23219
(804)698-4236
Information is also available on the names and addresses of the UST sites in the State currently in
need of remediation: A vendor may write to the main office:
Virginia Department of Environmental Quality
Water Quality Division
UST Program
629 East Main Street
Richmond, VA 23219
(804)698-4000
Any of the offices below also can provide information on UST sites. There may be a charge for each
report requested. , ~
6-14 .
-------
Regional Offices
Department of Environmental Quality
Northern Regional Office
1549 Old Bridge Road /
Suite 108
Wqodbridge, VA" 22192
(703)490-8922 ':
(703) 490-6773 (facsimile)
Attn: Chris Byer ' ,
Department of Environmental Quality
Piedmont Regional Office
P.O. Box 6030
Glen Allen, VA 23058
(804)524-5302
(804).527-5247 (facsimile)
Attn: Marlee Parker
Department of Environmental Quality
Tidewater Regional Office
287 Independence Boulevard
Pembroke Two
Suite 310 '
Virginia Beach, VA 23462
(804)552-1840
' (804) 552-1849 (facsimile)
Attn: Gene Suidyla
Department of Environmental Quality
West Central Regional Office
P.O. Box 7017
Roanoke, VA 24019
(703)562-3666 , ,
(703) 562-3680 (facsimile) ,
Attn: Bruce Davidson
Department of Environmental Quality
Valley Regional Office
P.O. Box 268
Bridgewater, VA 22812 v
(703)828-2595
(703) 828-4016 (facsimile)
Attn: Kim Mullin
Department of Environmental Quality
Southwest Regional Office
P.O. Box 1688
Abingdon, VA 24212-1688
(703) 676-4800
(703) 676-4899 (facsimile)
Attn: Dan Manweiler
6-15
i
-------
THIS PAGE IS INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
6-16
-------
NPL Sites in Virginia at Which Marketing Opportunities Exist1
Operable Unit
Number Name - (Lead)
RA Planned RI/FS
Start Date" Completed
Media
Volume'
Contaminants
. Technology
SITENAME: ABEX CORP . EPA ID: VAD980551683 " ADDRESS: RANDOLPH + GREEN ST; PORTSMOUTH, VA 23704 -
NPL STATUS: Final. ; . .--..... - : , . :; , SIZE: ; / 2 Acres :; . ;:".--: ;. TYPE: /: Recycling Waste Oil . '/ '/:..'". .',".'
01 NA ' ' (PS/FE/RP)
02 NA (RP/FE)
3/31/96 1 Y
6/30/99 N
AI;DB;SO
GW;SO;.SW
NA
NA
METALS; PCBs;
VOCs .
NA
-Monitoring; Off-Site Treatment; Decontamination; .
Solidification and Stabilization
NA
SITENAME: ARROWHEAD ASSOCIATES/SCOViLL CORP ^.f ^'.' -'":":'" ^EPAlD.: 1VAD042916361 > ADDRESS: RTE 3; MONTROSS, VA 22520
NPLSTATUS: Final ' - '' "' ^:': _' / .;- :';"''_. jv -': ,"\::.;-.c '-/'..''.; :- -' "./.;: SI?E(.v^ ?25 "Acres., vT'v- . ""' TYPE: Other
01 NA (PS/FE/RP)
. 12/31/95 Y .
t
t
i
AI; GW; SD; SO;
SW
NA
VOCs; METALS;
OTHER
INORGANICS
Monitoring; Air Stripping Technologies; Disposal of
Residual; Leachate Treatment; Off-Site Treatment;
Precipitation; Steam Stripping
SITENAME: ATLANTIC WOOD INDUSTRIES, INC EPA ID: VAD99D7 10410 ' ADDRESS: 3550 ELM ST; PORTSMOUTH, V A 23704
NPL STATUS: Final ' SIZE: 15 Acres - TYPE: Wood Preserving - \
01 ONSlTE SOILS (RP/FE)
02 .GROUNDWATER AND
'OFF-SITE -, (RP/FE)
7/01/98 , N
6/30/99 ' N
so
GW -
-. -
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA .
SITENAME:. AVTEX FIBERS, INC .: EPA ID: VAD070358684 ADDRESS: BOX 1169 KENDRICKLN; FRONT ROYAL, VA 22630
.NPLSTATUS; Final :":' ;-.-;- --- -.. -.- : - -v; -...; -,;- sizS:--"'--J30 Acres' :v*ii ',";'-' ;-;,: - TYPE: ; ^ Satttaiy^ervi^s-WasieWaterlTre^
06 Rl/FS-EPA ' ;(RP/F) 6/30/00 | N J
; -, : . . = ; ^-^-: ,-,
07 RI/FSPRP '" (RP/FE)
6/30/99 N
DK . [ NA
DK
NA
NA .
NA '. . . /
. NA
NA
SITENAME: BUCKINGHAM COUNTY LANDFILL. ' . EPA ID: VAD089Q27973 ; ADDRESS: ST RTE 640 W OF US RTE 15; DILLWYN, VA 23936
NPLSTATUS: Final ' : ; .. : v... .: ;:..; '..;-,-.- '..- . -\;.i /:SIZE; ,: -8 Acies: -,.., .- ' . ;TWEiJ;^;/ RefoseSystems--C^Kjisppsa!Landfill;^
01 . RCRAAREA (RP/FE)
' 12/31/96 j Y .
GW; RC; SL; SO;
ST
NA
/
NA
; NA ,
SITENAME; CULPEPER WOOD PRESERVERS, INC EPA ID: VAD059I65282 ADDRESS; RTE 666; CULPEPER, VA 22701
NPL STATUS: Final . . .SIZE: 20Aicres ;... -TYPE: Wood Preserving
- 01 NA ~ , (F/FE/RP)
3/30/98 : , Y .
"DB;GW;LW;SO;,
SW
NA
NA _
.".. . ' NA- .' ' .
Data as of May 1995 from. EPA CERCLIS and RELAI Databases. See Section 1.8 for a detailed description of these data sources, .
Some RA planned start dates, have passed; the actual RA start date had not been recorded as of March 1995. This circumstance may have occurred because (1) the project is
running later than planned or (2) the actual RA start date was recorded after the data were extracted. " ..
Abbreviations: . . . ,
AI
DB
DK
EP
ES
'Air .
Debris
Unknown
'EPAIn-House
Entire Site
F
FE
FF
GW
LW
EPA Fund-Financed
Federal Enforcement
Federal Facilities
Groundwater
Liquid Waste
MR
MS
NA
NO
OT
Mixed Funding Federal/RP-
Man-made Structures
Not Available
No Media .
Other .
. PS
RA
RC
RP
S
PRP Response Under State
Remedial Actions
RCRA Hazardous Waste
Responsible Party
State, Fund-Financed
SD
SI
SL
SO
SR
t
Sediment
Single Intake
Sludge
Soil
PRP Lead Under State
ST
SW
UXO
VOCs
Solid Waste
Surface Water .
Unexploded Ordnance
Volatile Organic
Compounds
6-17
-------
Table 6-2 (continued)
NPL Sites fa Virginia at Which Marketing Opportunities Exist*
Operable Unit
Number Name (Lead)
RA Planned
Start Date*
RI/FS
Completed
Media
i "
Volume
*t Contaminants
Technology
SITE NAME: DEFENSE GENERAL SUPPLY CENTER EPA ID: VA397 1520751 ADDRESS: JEFFERSON DAVIS HWY; RICHMOND, VA 23297
NPL STATUS: Final * SIZE: 321 Acre TYPE: Misc.
02 AREA 50 SOURCE AREA (FF)
03 NATL. GUARD SOURCE AREA (FF)
04 FIRE TRNG. SOURCE AREA (FF)
05 ACID NEUTRALIZATION PIT (FF)
06 AREA 50/NATL. GUARD GW (FF)
07 FIRE TRNG. AREA GW (FF)
08. ACID NEUT. PIT GW (FF)
12/31/97
9/30/96
9/30/97
2/15/94
' 9/30/97
9/30/96
3/31/97
N
N
N
Y'
N
N
N
Al; DB; LW; RC;
SO;ST
SO
AI;RC;SO;ST
SO
Al;GW
AI;GW
AI;GW
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA -
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
METALS; VOCs
NA
NA
NA
NA
- NA
NA
Air Stripping Technologies; Surface Capping Only;
Disposal of Residual; Leachate Treatment; Monitoring
' . . NA
NA
NA
SITENAME: FORT EUSTIS (US ARMY) : - : . EPA ID: :VA6210020321 ADDRESS: FT EUSTIS; NEWPORT NEWS ! VA 23604
NPLSTATUS: Proposed SIZE: NA .TYPE: NA V '=''
01 NA . . - (FF)
9/30/99
N
NA
NA
' . NA
SITE NAME: GREENWOOD CHEMICAL co . . EPAID: VAD003125374 ADDRESS: PO BOX 26 OFF STATE RTE 690- GREENWOOD VA
NPLSTATUS! Final;; : x ; .; : - - / .' =y ; ,;» .p /; >.^yVSIZE: iSAeres 22943
;...; ;.;......... . -.'" '":"" TYPE: Abandoned - No Use
02 NA (F/RP)
12/31/95 Y GW ' NA
VOCs
Precipitation; Off-Site Treatment; Steam Stripping;
Thermal Treatment with On-Site Placement; Monitoring
SITENAME: GREENWOOD CHEMICAL CO EPA ID: VAD003 125374 ADDRESS: PO BOX 26 OFF STATE RTE 690- GREENWOOD VA
NPLSTATUS! Final . SIZE! 15 Acres ' 22943
I..; TYPE: Abandoned -No Use
04 . NA . (F/RP) ] 6/30/98 ] - N f SD; SO ' ! NA NA
NA
SITENAME; H&H INC.. BURN PIT . EPA ID: VAP980539878 : ADD'RESS: JO MILES N RTE 33; MONTPELIPR, VA 23192
NPLSTATUS: Final . SIZE:: 1 Acre - TYPE: : Abandoned i No Use " :
01 NA (F/RP) | -6/30/97
N
GW; SD; SO
NA } NA
NA
Data as of May 1995 from EPA CERCLIS and RELAI Databases. See Section 1.8 for a detailed description of these data sources.
Some RA planned start dates have passed; the actual RA start date had not been recorded as of March 1995. This circumstance may have occurred because (1) the project is
running later than planned or (2) the actual RA start date was recorded after the data were extracted.
Abbreviations:
AI ,Air
DB Debris
DK Unknown
EP EPA In-House
ES Entire Site
F-
FE
FF
GW
LW
EPA Fund-Financed
Federal Enforcement
Federal Facilities
Grpundwater
Liquid Waste
MR
MS
NA
NO
OT
Mixed Funding Federal/RP
Man-made Structures
Not Available
No Media
Other
PS
RA
RC
RP
S
^^^KB
PRP Response Under State
Remedial Actions
RCRA Hazardous Waste
Responsible Party
State, Fund-Financed
^^^^^^^^^^^^^l^HHBHI
SD
SI
SL
SO
SR
^^^^^B
Sediment
Single Intake
Sludge
Soil
PRP. Lead Under State
^^BBBBB^B^^^^B
ST Solid Waste
SW Surface Water
UXO Unexploded Ordnance
VOCs Volatile Organic
Compounds
^^^^^^^^^^[[^..^^^^^^M
-------
NPL Sites in Virginia at Which Marketing Opportunities Exist3
Operable Unit
Number Name . (Lead)
RA Planned
Start Date"
RI/FS
Completed
SITE NAME: ;" L.A. CLARKE & SON
NPL STATUS; Final
04 NA (RP)
6/30/95
NA
Media
Volume '
EPA ID: VAD007972482
;SIZE: 10 Acres
SD 1 NA
Contaminants
Technology
ADDRESS: RTE 608; SPOTSYLVANIA, VA 22553
TYPE! Abandoned -No Use
NA
NA
SITE NAME: LANGLEY AFB/NASA LANGLEY RESEARCH CENTER EPA ID: VA2800005033 . , ADDRESS: BACK RIVER PENINSULA/MAIL CODE 429;
NPL STATUS: Final " - - SIZE; NA HAMPTON, VA 23665
. -" -';-' - ' TYPE: NA' - ' -
03 TABBS CREEK -" (FF)
12/31/99 ] "N. INA | - ' NA j NA ' ^, I . , NA
SITE NAME: NAVAL SURFACE WARFARE -DAHLGREN >- : EPA ID: VA7 170024684
NPL STATUS: Final ? : ; - ' : 'J " . " -SIZE: NA. ; " ' ;
01 HG CONTAMINATION ' (FF)
X
02 DISPOSAL BURN AREA ' (FF)
03 FENCED ORDNANCE AREA (pF)
04 CHEMICAL BURN AREA . .. ' (FF)
05 LANDFILLS (FF)
06 . REMAINING SOURCES . (FF)
3/31/96
9/30/96
12/31/96 .
9/30/96
1/3/02
1/3/03
N
N
N
N
N
, N
.GW;LW;SD;SO;
ST
NA :
NA. *
NA .
NA "..
NA':
, NA
NA
NA
NA
NA . ,
NA
ADDRESS: 2 Ml E OF INTER 301 & 206; DAHLG'REN; VA 22448
TYPE: Ordnance Testing and Maintenance; Mi'sc.; Recycling Waste Oil; -
, ' Undevelpped Land (Incl. forests,fields,wetlands) : .......
METALS; PCBs;
PAHs ,
NA
NA -
NA
NA '-.,
NA
, . NA :
.NA '".'".'
NA
NA '
_r .__ ,v , . .,...,. .;-....; " .... i ' "
. NA '. ' -'- , , -
NA- '
SITE NAME: NAVAL WEAPONS STATION - YORKTOWN -.'..' y EPA ID: V M 170024 170 : . ADpRESS: US NAVAL WEAPONS STA; YORKTOWN, V A 23690
NPL STATUS:; Final ;. "" '^:''-V -:! .;;. ';"'' , -. '" - ':. . : :: - ; ' . . . - '"' ;"'-' -" iVSEZEi;' :--NA^: :..-^V; :; ' ''; '.. ; .-.';'' TJVffe^f ^fdnan^PrediicitJpn'and-Stqrage _ >
02 SrrES6,7,12,16,SSA16
&BCKGD (FF)
12/31/98
N
NA | ' NA
'.. --' . . i .; -. '
NA -
. NA - " . .
Data as of May 1995 from EPA CERCLIS and RELAI Databases. .See Section 1.8 for a detailed description of these data sources. .
Some RA planned start dates have passed; the actual RA start date had not been recorded as of March 1995., This circumstance may have occurred because (1) the project is
running later than planned Or (2) the actual RA start date was recorded after the data were extracted. ''.-
Abbreviations: .".... . - .-.."'. '':"'.
AI
DB
DK
EP.
ES
Air
Debris
Unknown
EPAIn-House
Entire Site
' F
FE
FF
GW
LW
EPA Fund-Financed
Federal Enforcement
Federal Facilities
.Groundwater
Liquid Waste
MR
MS
NA
NO
OT
Mixed Funding Federal/RP -
.Man-made Structures
Not Available
No Media
Other
PS
RA
RC
RP
S
PRP Response Under State
Remedial Actions
RCRA Hazardous Waste
Responsible Party
State, Fund-Financed
- SD
SI
SL
SO
SR
Sediment
: Single Intake
Sludge
Soil
PRP Lead Under State
ST
SW
UXO
VOCs
Solid Waste- '
Surface Water
Unexploded Ordnance
Volatile Organic
Compounds
6-19
-------
Table 6-2 (continued)
NFL Sites In Virginia at Which Marketing Opportunities Exist1
Operable Unit
Number Name (Lead)
RA Planned
Start Date*
RI/FS
Completed
Media
i
Volume
Contaminants
Technology
SITE NAME- RENTOKIL, INC. (VA WOOD PRESERVING DIV) EPA IB: VAD071040752 ADDRESS: OAKVIEW AVE & PEYTON STS; RICHMOND. VA
NPLSTATUS: Final " SIZE: 4Acres , 23228
-..-. ... .; TYPE: Undeveloped Land (Incl. forests, fields, wetlands); Qliier
01 ENTIRE SITE (RP/FE)
3/31/96
Y
DB; GW; SD; SL;
SO;SW
NA
SITE NAME: RHINEHART TIRE FIRE DUMP EPA ID: VAD980831796
NPLSTATUS: Final ' SIZE: 5 Acres
03 NA . (F)| . 4/15/98 | N [ OW; SO ] NA
METALS;
PESTICIDES/
HERBICIDES;
VOCs
Decontamination; Off-Site Treatment; Disposal of
Residual; Precipitation; Leachate Treatment; Recycling;
Monitoring; Surface Capping Only; Incineration with On-
Site Disposal of Residual; Steam Stripping; Solidification
and Stabilization; Thermal Treatment with On-Site
Placement
ADDRESS:. MT FALLS; WINCHESTER, VA 22601 ' .
TYPE: . Abandoned -No Use , .
NA
NA . ..
SITE NAME: SALTVILLE WASTE DISPOSAL PONDS EPAID: V ADQ03 127578 ^ ; ':- ADDRESS: ALLISON GAP- RD.; SALTVJLLE.VA 24370 : Vr JF ^
NPLSTATUS: Final '- ' ' '' SIZE: 125 Acres '.: TYPE: Abandoned- No Use'.;' r ; .: ; -- ;.y
03 DISPOSAL PONDS (RP/FE).
'04 RIVER BIOASSESSMENT " (RP/FE)
5/15/98
8/17/99
N
N
DB; GW; SD; SO;
.SW
SD; SO; SW
. NA
NA
METALS
METALS
. NA
. ' . NA
SITE NAME' SAUNDERS SUPPLY CO ' = : ' H : ^ i '; EPATDr VAD003 117389'. ADDRESS: KINGS HWY BY CRITTENDEN& GOD)V; : . :
NPLSTATUS: Final : :i::: . :" : . :SIZE: , ; 4Acres ' CHUCKATUCK, VA 23432
:..-.'..'-.': . .- : ..-;.'-.: ,.: ; -i: \. .-. TYPE: : Lumber and Other Building Materials . ..
01 NA . (F)
3/31/96
Y
DB; GW; MS; SD;
SL; SO; SW
NA
METALS;
PESTICIDES/
HERBICIDES;
VOCs .
Off-Site Treatment; Solidification and Stabilization;
Disposal of Residual; Monitoring; Leachate Treatment;
Steam Stripping -.''
' Data as of May 1995 from EPA CERCLIS and RELAI Databases. See Section l.S.for a detailed description of these data sources.
" Some RA planned start dates have passed; the actual RA start date had not been recorded as of March 1995. This circumstance may have occurred because (1) the project-is
running later than planned or (2) the actual RA start date was recorded after the data Were extracted. .
Abbreviations: _ ° ~
AI
DB
DK
EP
ES
Air
Debris
Unknown
EPA In-House
Entire Site
F
FE
FF
GW
LW
EPA Fund-Financed
Federal Enforcement
Federal Facilities
Qroundwater
Liquid Waste
MR
MS
NA
NO
OT
' Mixed Funding Federal/RP
Mali-made Structures
Not Available
No Media
Other
PS
-RA
RC
RP
S
PRP Response Under State
Remedial Actions
RCRA Hazardous Waste
Responsible Party
State, Fund-Financed
SD
SI
SL
SO
SR
Sediment
Single Intake
Sludge .
Soil
- PRP Lead Under State
ST
SW
UXO
VOCs
Solid Waste
Surface Water
Unexploded Ordnance
Volatile Organic
Compounds
-------
Table 6-3 -
RCRA Facilities in Virginia Currently Undergoing Corrective Action*
SITE NAME
MAILINGS ADDRESS
AMOCO OIL GO
PO BOX 24008
RICHMOND, VA 23224
AMOCO OIL .CO YORKTOWN REFINERY
PO BOX 578 :
YORKTOWN, VA 23690 '
BABCOCK & WILCOX - N N F D .
PO BOX 785
LYNCHBURG, VA 24505-0785
BAYER CORP.
MOBAYROAD
PITTSBURGH, PA 15205 ' .
BREAZER MATERIALS & SERVICES, INC.
436 SEVENTH AVENUE, SUITE 1150
PITTSBURG, PA 15129
GENICOM CORPORATION
1 GENICOM -DR
WAYNESBORO, VA 22980 . .
I T T ELECTRO-OPTICAL PRODUCTS
7635 PLANTATION RD NW .
ROANOKE, VA 24019
EPAro;-::^;vC;C:-::^^,:V':;
VAD000607879
VAD050990357
VAD046960449 , .
VAD003379062
VAD003121977
VAD003 132438
VAD003123072 . ,
^SWMU: Aj^^pttl^NAMES,; ,;-'- ": ;' .; \ - ^ ^ ', ' / .-:; - -.
ENTIRE FACILITY
ENTIRE FACILITY
ENTIRE FACILITY
GROUNDWATER
MOBAY-DAMASCUS
ENTIRE FACILITY
ENTIRE FACILITY
ENTIRE FACILITY
Data as of May 1995 from the EPA RCRIS database. See Section 1.8 for a detailed description of data sources.
.6-21
-------
Table 6-3 (continued)
RCRA Facilities in Virginia Currently Undergoing Corrective Action3
SITE NAME '
MAILING ADDRESS
I T T-EOPD
7635 PLANTATION RD, NW
ROANOKE, VA 24019
NAVAL AIR STATION OCEANA
VIRGINIA BEACH, VA 23460
STAR ENTERPRISE
4 EXECUTIVE PARK EAST, NE
ATLANTA, GA .
EPA ID
VAD980550909
VA2170024606
VA988203360
SWMU AND UNIT NAMES " '
ENTIRE FACILITY
ENTIRE FACILITY
ENTIRE FACILITY
Data as of May 1995 from the EPA RCRIS database. See Section 1.8 for a detailed description of data sources.
6-22
-------
7.0 DEMAND FOR REMEDIATION OF SITES IN WEST VIRGINIA
This section is organized in six sections. The first section discusses the State hazardous waste
management program and its regulatory, authority. The second and third sections discuss the market
.at sites addressed through the Federal Superfilhd program and the Federal Resource Conservation and
Recovery Act (RCRA) corrective action sites respectively.; The fourth section discusses underground
storage tank (UST) sites in the State. The fifth section discusses the market at Department of Defense
(DoD) sites in West Virginia that require remediation. The sixth section of the chapter presents
further useful information about working in the State.
Figures 7-1 and 7-2 present maps of the State of
West Virginia that indicate the locations of sites
listed on the NPL and RCRA facilities in the
State, respectively1. There are only six NPL
sites in the State. Four of the six sites are
located in the northern part of the State, and the
other two sites in the west. The majority of the
RCRA facilities in West Virginia are located in
the western part ,of the State, with many located
along the Ohio River on the western border.
Some use of innovative technologies has
occurred in West Virginia., According to the
Innovative treatment Technologies: Annual
Status Report (Seventh Edition), ex situ
bioremediation has been applied at a Superfund
site in West Virginia. ,
Summary Information
The U.S: Environmental Protection Agency
(EPA) manages six Superfund National Priorities
List (NPL) sites in West Virginia. Of those six
sites, three are Federal facilities and four are
NPL sites that have operable units at which; :
remedial action has not yet begiui. f There; are;
four RCRA facilities in West Virginia that are
subject to a requirement to conduct a corrective
measures study (CMS). Three of the State's
RCRA facilities are under a requirement to
conduct a RCRA facility investigation (RFI). '
According to the EPA Office of Underground
Storage Tanks (OUST), cleanups need to be
initiated at 342 confirmed release sites. Finally,
there are five active DoD installations and
formerly used defense sites (PUDS) located, in
West Virginia. Of the installations'53, sites,
remediation currently is-planned for 50 sites.
1 Figures 7-1 and 7-2 do not indicate the locations of all NPL sites or all RCRA facilities
located in West Virginia. LandView II contains information from the Comprehensive
Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Information System (CERCLIS) on
NPL sites and other.sites. It also contains information from the Biennial Reporting System
(BRS) on treatment, storage, and disposal facilities and major generators of hazardous waste.
7-1
-------
N
ir
Weirton .
Wheeling
Source: Modified from LandView n, based
on data as of September 1994. " Not to Scale
Figure 7-1
NPL Sites in West Virginia
7-2
-------
N
tr
Source: Modified from LandView II, based
, on data as of September 1994. Not to Scale
figure 7-2
RCRA Facilities in West Virginia
7-3
-------
7.1 The West Virginia Hazardous Waste Management Program
In 1993, the State of West Virginia established its Bureau of Environment. Within the Bureau of
Environment are one division, one commission, and four boards: the Division of Environmental
Protection (DEP), the Oil and Gas Conservation Commission, the Solid Waste Management Board,
the Air Quality Board, the Environmental Quality Board, and the Surface Mine Board.
Within the DEP are eight offices that report to the director and deputy director, who are supported by
other offices. The eight offices are: Abandoned Mine Land, Air Quality, Mining and Reclamation,
Oil and Gas, Waste Management, Legal Services, Water Resources, and Administration. " ' .
'""N.
The State of West Virginia has established three statutory.authorities governing hazardous'waste, all
in Volume 8A § 22 Articles 1 through 21 (1981 as amended in 1985, 1989, 1991, and 1994). The
Hazardous Waste Emergency Response Fund Act establishes a fund for emergency responses and the
State's cleanup authorities. According to EPA's An Analysis of State Superfund Programs: 50-State.
Study, 1993 Update, the fund had a balance of $2.2 million at the end of fiscal year 1993. The fund
may be used for program administration, site investigation, studies and design, operation and
maintenance, emergency response., removals, remedial action, and matching funds under the
Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA). The
Hazardous Waste Management Act establishes requirements for disclosure related to property transfer.
The Ground-water Protection Act establishes groundwater standards that the State may use in
establishing cleanup levels. .' ,
The West Virginia UST program administers the State's regulations governing USTs and leaking
underground storage tanks (LUST), in accordance with Volume 8A § 22 Article 17, effective June
10, 1988. The program is administered by the Office of Waste Management that consists of about
150 administrative, permitting, support, and field staff members throughout the State. The program:
Requires the registration of tanks and payment of a registration fee
Establishes standards for .USTs -
Provides a certification program for installers and inspectors
7-4.
-------
Provides reporting procedures and cleanup requirements for LUSTs-
Provides an insurance fund for cleanups
The management organization of the Office of Waste Management consists of the central office in
Charleston and six district offices. The central office is responsible for developing policies,
regulations, and procedures; the district offices are responsible for implementing the program.
West Virginia currently is seeking authorization from EPA to implement corrective actions required
under R.CRA. The State, therefore, has adopted by reference the Federal regulations/governing
corrective action under RCRA. Currently, the State manages one site under a joint Federal-State
agreement. . .
West Virginia does not have a formal state program that manages abandoned hazardous waste sites,
but does on occasion, clean up such sites as deemed necessary to mitigate risks to human health and
the environment. These cleanups are funded by the West Virginia Hazardous Waste Emergency
Response Fund, which is supported by hazardous waste generator fees.,. '
7.2 The Market at Abandoned Sites Managed Under the Federal Superfund Program
EPA manages six NPL sites in West Virginia. The NPL sites are concentrated in the northern part of
the State (see Figure 7-1). Table 7-1, found at the end of this section, presents detailed information
from the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Information System
(CERCLIS) database on the four NPL sites in West Virginia at which remediation activities have not ,
yet begun. As of March 1995, no additional sites in the State currently are being considered for
listing on the NPL. Of the six sites currently on the NPL, five were listed in the 1980s;-.and ,
remediation activities are substantially complete at two sites. Table 7-1 indicates that remedial
, activities at operable units at four NPL sites have not yet begun. Those sites and operable units are
, of the greatest'interest to vendors, as technologies may have been selected, but vendors for the
technologies have not. Contamination with metals in both the soil and groundwater is present at the
majority of the sites. Contamination with volatile organic compounds (VOC) also is present at
several sites. The presence of explosive nitroaromatic compounds also is reported at the West
Virginia Ordnance site, a U.S. Army installation.
7-5 '
-------
Several .technologies have been selected for use at the sites. Those technologies include, but are not
limited to, biodegradation and bioremediation. No data were available on the volumes of
contaminated soil or groundwater to be treated. ,
Table 7-2 summarizes the number of remedial investigations and feasibility studies (RI/FS), remedial
designs (RD), remedial actions (RA), and removals that are planned, in progress, or complete
throughout West Virginia.
. Table 7-2
Number of Sites and Operable Units at Federal NPL Sites in West Virginia
Phase of Activity
Number of Sites ;
Number of
Operable Units
Remedial Investigations/Feasibility Studies . : :
Planned
In Progress
Complete (RD not started)
.2 . '
4-
.0
'5
6 ;
0
Remedial Designs;
Planned
In Progress
Complete (RA not started)
' . 4 '
3
0
11
, , 3
0
Remedial Actions . .
Planned
In Progress
Complete
4 .
2 ,
. 3
14
2
, 5
Removals " \ ';...-', _ .'... . '".'.:". :. '.'.
Started
Complete
3 ' : .
; 3
3,
3
Source: Data as of May 1995 from EPA CERCLIS database; see Section 1.8 for a detailed description of the data sources.
f .
The sizes of the contaminated areas range from 12 acres to as many as 8,000 acres. Figure 7-3
presents the distribution of sizes of NPL sites in West Virginia. , ,
7-6
-------
Figure7-3
NPL Site Size Distribution for the State of West Virginia
-1000
1001-2000
2001 - 3000
Acres
.3001-4000
>'4000
7.3 The Market at RCRA Corrective Action Sites
"' * ' ; ,' : -, \ , . .
Although West Virginia is authorized to issue RCRA Part B hazardous waste management permits for
hazardous waste facilities, it is not authorized to administer the corrective action program; all
corrective action activities are managed by EPA Region 3. West Virginia does not have a separate
State-mandated corrective action program for operating hazardous waste facilities. Data from the
Resource Conservation and Recovery Information System (RCRIS) database indicate there are 35
RCRA facilities in the State: 18 land disposal units, 9 incinerators, and.28 storage and treatment
units2. .Four of th$ RCRA facilities currently require corrective action. The definition of requiring
corrective action used here is that the facility has been required to perform a CMS. The number of
facilities with a CMS imposed is not a direct subset of RCRA treatment, storage, and disposal. (TSD)
facilities, instead it is a subset of TSD facilities and hazardous.waste generators. .While TSD facilities
are statutorily required to address corrective action, EPA has discretionary authority to impose
corrective action on generators. Table 7-3, found at the end of this section, lists facilities^ with
2 A facility may be included in more than one of these categories. .
''' ''.:-, 7-7 ''..-..
-------
their mailing addresses, that are scheduled to undergo corrective action in the future. In two cases,
the entire facility is Ijsted as subject to corrective action. It is likely that there are many solid waste
management units (SWMU) at the two facilities, a circumstance that, in each case, prompted the
permit writer to indicate that the entire facility was in need of corrective action.
* * . ' .' .,-' . ' v . __
In addition, three sites are under a requirement to conduct a RCRA facility investigation (RFI). The
number of facilities, with an RFI imposed is not a direct subset of RCRA TSD facilities, instead it is a
subset of TSD facilities and hazardous waste generators. While TSD facilities are statutorily required
to address corrective action, EPA has discretionary authority to impose corrective action on
generators. As discussed in Section 1.2, these sites may also provide either a long-term opportunity
or near-term opportunity where no CMS is necessary to begin Corrective action or corrective activity
begins in accordance with the stabilization initiative.
No data were available in RCRIS to indicate the media contaminated or the contaminants of concern
at the RCRA facilities in the State. .
7.4 The Market at UST Sites Managed by the State .
As shown in Table 7-4, West Virginia has approximately 8,904 active tanks. Active tanks are
defined as tanks still in service.', Confirmed releases have been reported at 19 percent of active tanks.
Table 7-4
Underground Storage Tank Corrective Action Measures
in West Virginia as of Third Quarter FY95
! Active
Tanks
8,904
Tanks
Closed
12,865
Confirmed
.Releases
1,734
Cleanups
Initiated
1,392
Cleanups
Completed
, 533 ,
As of July 1995, 1,734 confirmed releases were reported by West Virginia to EPA's Office of
Underground Storage Tanks (OUST) for which cleanup has yet to be initiated at 342 sites. The
number of UST sites identified as marketing opportunities for vendors of innovative technologies will
change rapidly, because of the combination of rapid increases in the number of confirmed releases
and continuing site closures. In national studies by EPA in 1991 and 1992, it was found that the
7-8
-------
majority, or about 8.7 percent, of tanks are used to manage gasoline or diesel fuel, kerosene, and
heating oil. Of the remaining.USTs, 13 percent manage other materials and wastes such as used oil
(4 percent), hazardous material (2 percent), and other material (5 percent) or are empty. (2 percent).
The majority of the contamination problems are related to the contamination of soils and groundwater
with petroleum products that contain VOCs and semivolatile organic compounds (SVOC) (EPA
1992a, 1992b). ,
Conversations with representatives of the State indicate that the State currently uses innovative
treatment technologies at some of its UST corrective action sites, those treatment include: air
sparging, soil vapor extraction, bioremediation, dual phase extraction, and air stripping.:
7.5 The Market at Federal Facility Sites in West Virginia ;%
As is the case with all of the other states in Region 3, there are no Department of Energy "(DOE)
facilities in the state where remedial actions are planned.. There are.five active DoD installations and
FUDS in the State. At those installations, there are 50 active sites where DoD is planning
remediation. The total number of sites at the installations that require remediation may exceed that
figure because DoD has not completed its evaluation of all the sites.
The Defense Environmental Restoration Program Annual Report to .Congress for 1994 indicates that a
total pf about $114 million in funding is estimated to be needed through the year 2015 in all phases of
cleanup1 at the five installations. The bulk of the funds ($73 million) is allocated to West Virginia
Ordnance Works, which is listed on the NPL. The smallest amount of funds ($2:8 million) is
allocated to Morgantown Ordnance Works, also listed on the NPL. Many of the sites identified at the
five DoD installations either are undergoing or are scheduled to undergo RI/FSs and, therefore,'are at
a relatively early stage of the remediation process. ...-'-'.
The majority of the contaminants at the sites at which remediation currently is planned fall into three
broad categories:' petroleum, oil, and lubricants (POL), VOCs, and metals. No data are available on
volumes of .soil and groundwater ito be treated, table 7-5 presents information on the individual, DoD
installations in West Virginia and the sites subject to remediation at those installations. Staff at each
installation determine the individual sites at which they plan to perform remedial actions. Cleanup
already may'be underway at other sites, but those sites are not included in the table because it is
unlikely that they will.affdrd nearrterm opportunities for vendors of innovative technologies. Of the
- - ' '-'. 7-9' ''.:' - '.- ; ' ".
-------
installations included in the table, Allegany Ballistics' Laboratory, Morgantown Ordnance Works, and
West Virginia Ordnance Works are listed on the NPL.
Table 7-5
Dot) Installations and Sites in West Virginia at Which Cleanup is Planned3
Name, Address,
and Outyear Funding; ($000)
Allegany Ballistics Laboratory
Outyear Funding FY95-2010
$29,416
EWVRA Shepherd Field ANGB
Outyear Funding FY95-2005
$4,956 -
Yeager Air National Guard Base
Charleston 25311-5000.
Outyear Funding FY95-2003 '
$4,281
Morgantown Ordnance Works
Outyear Funding FY95-2004
$2,766
West Virginia Ordnance Works
Outyear Funding FY95-2015
$72,989
All Other Installations
$19,407
Federal Facility
Identification;"
Number: i;;.
WV3 17002369100
WV357282845500
WV357282589100
*
WV39799F346200
WV39799F346100
«,
Codes*
A, N
A
A
F,N
F,.N
*
Number of Sites at :
'.. '" ;.;?wia
-------
To apply for certification, vendors may contact:
West Virginia DEP
Financial and Administrative Division
State Capital Complex
Building 1, Room E102
.1900 Kanawha Boulevard East
Charleston, WV 25305-0130
(304)558-2311 -
(304) 558-3970 (facsimile)
A vendor that wishes to obtain information about sites in West Virginia that are managed by EPA
may write to:
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Region 3
841 Chestnut Building
Philadelphia, PA 19107
For information on RCRA facilities, the envelope should be marked to the attention of the Freedom
of Information Act Officer, Office of RCRA Programs. For information on CERCLA facilities, the
envelope should be marked to the attention of the Freedom'of Information Act Officer, Office of .
Superfund Programs, The requestor will be billed for the information, depending on the volume of
information. . -
" T * r '' '
' ' ' . ' ' - '.'"-.
Two lists that provide' data on UST sites are available to the public from the. West Virginia Division
of Environmental Protection. The current cost of each list appears below in parentheses. The Public
Information Office of the Office of Waste Management, Underground Storage Tank Section and
Leaking Underground Storage Tank; Section has available a list of active and inactive facilities
($60.00) and a list of active leak sites ($31.25). The list of active and inactive facilities includes the
facility identification number, the name 'and address of the owner, the location and address of the
tank, and contact person's name and telephone number. The list of active leak sites contains location
of the tank, facility and leak identification numbers, and the name and address of the owner. The
office can be contacted at and checks made payable to:
7-11
-------
West Virginia DEP
Public Information Office
10 McJunkin Road : .
Nitrb, WV 25142
(304)759-0515
(304) 759-0526 (facsimile) .
The offices of the West Virginia Division of Environmental Protection can be contacted at the
following addresses: .
Headquarters
West Virginia DEP , -
Office of Waste Management
1356 Hahsford Street .
Charleston, WV 25301 '
District Offices
District 1
West Virginia DEP
1304 Goose Run Road
Fairmont, WV 26554
(304) 367-2720
(304) 367-2727 (facsimile)
District 2
West Virginia DEP
No. 1 Depot Street
Romney, WV 26757
(304)822-3551
(304) 822-7331 (facsimile)
Districts
West Virginia DEP
P.O. Box 38
French Creek, WV 26218
(304) 924-6211
(304) 924-6781 (facsimile)
District 4
West Virginia DEP
General Delivery
MacArthur, WV 27873
(304) 256-6850
(304) 256-6948 (facsimile)
District 5
West Virginia DEP
694 Winfield Road
St. Albans, WV 25177
(304)758-0710
(304) 759-0706 (facsimile)
District 6
West Virginia DEP
2311 Ohio. Avenue
Parkersburg, WV 26101
(304) 420-4550
(304) 420-4554 (facsimile)
7-12 '
-------
lauie i-i
NPL Sites in West Virginia at Which Marketing Opportunities Exist3
Operable Unit
Number Name (Lead)
RA Planned
Start Dateb
RI/FS
Completed
Media
Volume
Contaminants
Technology
SITE NAME: ALLEGANY BALLISTICS LABORATORY (USNAVY) EPA ID: WVQ17002369i ADDRESS: RQCig&T CT; SHORT GAP, WV 26753
NPL STATUS: Final . ...... ''*"'- '' -. .'..;. .- . SIZE: 1,572 Acres . TYPE: NA : ,' ;. , : . - - ..
01 . (FF)
02 ALL OTHER FORMER
RI/FS SITES ' , (FF)
12/31/96
' 6/30/98 .
N
N .
GW; SO
~GW; SO; SW
NA
NA
VOCs; ACIDS-
EXPLOSIVES
EXPLOSIVES;
VOCs :
' NA
-.._-.- . NA ;- ,. ;--.
SITE.NAME: FIKE CHEMICAL, INC . \ - EPA ID: WVD0479&9207 ADDRESS: W 19TH ST; NITRO, WV 25 143 ' .
NPL STATUS: Final . J SIZE: :: : 12 Acres; : , TYPE:- Abandoned -No Use
03 ' ';. . - ' (F/RP)
04 : ' (RP/FE)
3/31/95
.
6/30/98
Y
'
N
AI; DB; LW; SL;
SO
GW; SD; SL; SO; .
SW
' NA
NA-
OTHER
INORGANICS; .
RADIOACTIVE
MATERIALS;
VOCs; METALS;
PESTICIDES/ :
HERBICIDES
NA , ..."
Monitoring; Off-Site Treatment; Incineration with On-
Site Disposal of Residual; Leachate Treatment;
Recycling; Temporary On-Site Storage; PH . ' '
Neutralization; Other Neutralization
- NA, ' '.-'.
SITENAME: , ORDNANCE WORKS DISPOSAL AREAS EPA ID: WVD000850404 ' ~f . . ADDRESS: 1100 DUPQNTRD; MQRGANTOWN, WV 2(5505 .
NPLSTATUS: Final ..:; : , SIZE: ': 1 10 Acres .' TYPE: -;. '-.', : Ordnance Testing and Maintenance; Qrdnanceprqduetion and: : {
: . ; ' , ' ; Storage^ Industrial Inorganic Chemicals; Industrial Organic :
. ' . ' . ' Chemicals; Coke Ovens; Crop Production; Manufacturing - .
'; ' ..;'.- - . - '.:'. -."' ; - - . Electroplating - -. '.'..:. 'V ' ' ;.' ': /',-::-- ',. .
01 LANDFILL/LAGOON/SCRAPED
AREAS '.'.- (FE/RP)
- 02 ' INDUSTRIAL AREA (RP/FE)
-.1
12/31/95
12/31/99
Y
' , 'N
'
AI; GW; SD; SO;
SW :
DB;GW;MS;RC;
SO; SW
NA
' NA
METALS; VOCs
NA
Monitoring; Biodegradation and Bioremediation
Treatment . ,
'. - . . NA
,a Dataasof May 1995 from EPA CERCLIS and RELAI Databases. See Section 1.8 fora detailed description of these data sources. . ' ' [
b Some RA planned start dates have passed; the actual RA start date had not been recorded as of March 1995. This circumstance may have occurred because (1) the project is;
running later than planned or (2) the actual RA start date was recorded after the data were extracted. - '
Abbreviations: ... . ' . . . - .
AI
DB
DK
EP
.ES
Air
Debris
Unknown
EPA-In-House
Eptire Site
F
FE
FF
GW
LW
EPA Fund-Financed ' ,
Federal Enforcement
Federal Facilities
Groundwater . .-
Liquid Waste
MR
MS
NA
NO
OT
Mixed Funding Federal/RP
.Man-made Structures \"
Not Available
No Media
.Other
PS
RA
RC
RP
. S
PRP Response Under State .
Remedial Actions
RCRA Hazardous Waste
Responsible Party
State, Fund-Financed
SD
SI
SL
SO
SR
Sediment . ,
Single Intake
Sludge
Soil
PRP Lead Under State
ST '
SW
UXO
VOCs
Solid Waste
Surface Water
Unexploded Ordnance
Volatile Organic
Compounds
7-13
-------
Table 7-1 (continued)
NPL Site In West Virginia at Which Marketing Opportunities Exist8
Operable Unit
Number Name (Lead)
RA Flamed
Start Dateb
RI7FS
Completed
Media
.. Volume1
Contain Inanls
Technology
SITE NAME: WEST VIRGINIA ORDNANCE (USARMY) EPA ID: WVD980713036 ADDRESS: RTB 1 BOX 125; PT PLEASENT, WV 25550
NPL STATUS: Final SIZE; 8.000 Acres TYPE: Crop Production; Meat and Dairy Production; Buildings
.;-_ _ (Residential land Commercial); Dwelling Operators; Mobile Home
.."-"" - . - ' . Site Operators; Nonresidential Building Operators; Refuse
-'; , " ^ : . - Systems-Open bunjp; Undeveloped Land (Irjcf. forests, fields,
'-.---' :;'' ..-' '-- ''-" "".-. ."..;:: ;- : : wetlands) =-: y- : '' --.: W '-.,-. ' >" '
04 NA - (FF)
05 NA ' - (FF)
06 WETLANDS MIT POND
7 AND 11 . (FF)
08 NA (FF)
'09 NA . . (FF)
10 NA . - . - - (FF)
' 11 NA . (FF)
.12 NA : (FF)
1/27/95
12/20/98
4/08/96
9/30/99
9/30/99
12/31/99
12/31/99
12/31/00
NA
NA
NA
N
' N
N.
N
, - N
OW
LW; RC; SD; SO;
SW
SW
NA .
NA
NA
NA .
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA -.
NA
NA
NA . '
NA
NA
NA
NA '
'NA
NA
NA
NA
' NA-
NA
NA
NA .
NA
NA
a Data as of May 1995 from EPA CERCLIS and RKLAI Databases, See Section 1.8 for a detailed description of these data sources.
b Some RA planned start dates have passed; the actual RA start date had noi been recorded as of March 1995. This circumstance may have occurred because (1) the project is
running later than planned or (2) the actual RA sun date was recorded after the data were extracted.
AI
DB
DK
EP
ES
Air
Debris
Unknown
EPA In-House"
Entire Site
F
FE
FF
GW
LW
EPA Fund-Financed
Federal Enforcement
Federal Facilities
Groundwater
Liquid Waste
MR
MS
NA
NO
OT
Mixed Funding Federal/RP
Man-made Structures
Not Available
No Media
Other
PS
RA
RC
RP
S
PRP Response Under State
Remedial Actions
RCRA Hazardous Waste
Responsible Party
State, Fund-Financed
SD
SI
SL
SO
SR-
i
Sediment
Single Intake
Sludge
Soil
. PRP Lead Understate
ST
SW
uxo
VOCs
Solid Waste
Surface "Water
Unexploded Ordnance
Volatile Organic
Compounds
-------
Table 7-3
RCRA Facilities in West Virginia Currently Undergoing Corrective Action"
SITE NAME ... . ':, . . v.,:-. ."- :.
MAILING ADDRESS "
HANLIN CHEMICALS WEST VIRGINIA .
SOUTH ROUTE 2
MOUNDSVILLE, WV 26041
OCCIDENTAL CHEMICAL CORP
PO BOX 615
BELLE, WV 25015
GE SPECIALTY CHEMICAL INC-SOUTH PLANT
1000 DUPONT RD.BLDG 816
MORGANTOWN, WV 26505
GE SPECIALTY CHEMICAL INC - NORTH PLANT
1000 DuPONT RD, BLDG 816
MORGANTOWN, WV 26505 .
EPA ID
WVD000765297
WVD005010277 .
WVD061776977
WVD980552384
:SWMU.AND:UNIT/^AME V ;-:-./'
GROUNDWATER
ENTIRE FACILITY
ENTIRE FACILITY
GE - SOUTH PLANT
GE - NORTH PLANT
t -
- - - ' ^ . ' -
." Data as of May 1995 from the EPA RCRIS database. See Section 1.8 for a detailed description of data sources.
7-15
-------
. THIS PAGE IS INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
7-16
-------
APPENDIX A
LIST OF ALL REGION 3 DOD INSTALLATIONS EITHER WITH TWO OR
FEWER SITES OR ESTIMATED COSTS FOR CLEANUP OF LESS
THAN OR EQUAL TO $1 MILLION
-------
-------
List of All Region 3 DoD Installations Either With Two or Fewer Sites
or Estimated Costs for Cleanup of Less Than or Equal to $1 Million
Facility Name
DELAWARE
DELAWARE TARGET AREAS
DOVER AFB PRE BOMB RANGE ,
DOVER SURVIVAL TRAINING ANNEX
DRAVO CORPORATION ,
FORT DELAWARE
LENAPE ORDNANCE MOD CENTER
US ARMY RESERVE CENTER DOVER
US ARMY RESERVE CENTER LEWES
Total DELAWARE .
FFID
Number
of
Sites
Estimated
Completion
Date
DE39799F1 33400 .
DE39799F133500 "
DE39799F135800
DE39799F136400
DE39799F134100
DE39799FI34400
DE3210015C0500
DE3210015C1600
- "
2 ;'
1 '
1 . . 2 -.
1
2
1
5
5
-19'
- TBD
2008
2008
TBD
. . ,2008
' TBD
TBD
« TBD
FY95 Cost
to Complete
$000
70
2,003
3,773
252
'l,983
0
0'
0
8,081
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
. , AAA FORT DUPONT DC39799F881200 .v i
ANACOSTTA NAVALS STATION DCS 17000115500 5
CAMP SIMMS . , '- DC39799F131200 2
. CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY, RESERVE STATION DC39799F812500 1
FORT DUPONT PARK SITE ' DC39799F131800 ,1
FORTMCNAIR ....- DC321002100400 7
NAVAL STATION ANACOST ANNEX DC39799F132900 1
. - SPRING VALLEY DC39799F833000 1
WASHINGTON NAVY YARD NAVALSTA DC39799F133200 2
WASHINGTON COMNAVDIST ' -DC317002431000 3
' WASHINGTON DC NAVOBSY ' DCS 17002345400 . . 1
WASHINGTON NRL DCS 17002431100 3
Total DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA 28
2008
TBD
2008
2008
2008
TBD
2008, .
2008
2008 .
TBD
TBD_
TBD
1,934
0
5,682
l,96g
1,934
626
. ., 2.092
4.078
1,923
.361
0
0
20,598
MARYLAND
, AAA SITE, CENTER BUREAU MD39799F139400 1
ADELPHI LABORATORY CENTER MD321002276200 ,42
AIR FORCE PLANT 11. . MD39799F141700 l'
ANNAPOLIS NRT FAC . MD3n002349200. . . ,-'.-!'
ASSATEAQUE ISLAND . . ' ' MD39799F143900 1
CHELTENHAM NAVCOMMU MD317009000700 3
CHESAPEAKE BAY DET NRL MD317002431100 9
CP SOMERSET .','.' MD39799F141100 2
EAST COAST RADIO REC STATION MD39799F141500 "2
' FORT HOLABIRD , MD39799F139200 .1
FORT HOLABIRD CRIMES REC. CENTER MD321002041900 9
FORT HOWARD MD39799F140600 2
FORT RITCHIE . . MD321002075800 4
.' HAWKINS POINT TER FACILITY . MD39799F140500 1
HERMANVILLE GAP FILLER ANNEX MD39799F142200 1
. INDIAN HEAD NAVEODTECHCEN . , ' MD317009000100 14
. JOHNS HOPKINS. UNIVERSITY LAB MD39799F812800 1
. MORTON THIOKOL (AMMUNITION PLT) MD39799F144200' 1
NATIONAL-DEF .STORAGE DEPOT BALT MD39799F137300 3
NAVAL RESEARCH LAB WALDORF MD317000894700 1
NAVAL RESERVE CENTER BALTIMORE' MD317002252600 1
NAVAL STATION ANNAPOLIS MD317009002200 , 1
NIKE 03 . MD39799F136800 1
NIKE BA-30/31 (TOLCHEST) MD39799F137700 2
NIKE BA^43 (FT;SMALLWOO) .MD39799F138000 2
. NIKE BA-79AV-05 (GRANIT) MD39799F138400 . 2'
NIKE BA-92 (GRNSPNG/TWS) MD39799F138600 2
2008
TBD
2008
TBD
2008
TBD
TBD
2008
TBD
.TBD
' TBD
2008
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
.2008
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
2008
2008
2008
2008
1.923
; 300
4.000
.0
2'.1I3
0
0
2.022
, 443
0
0
3.494
0
0
118
0
:.oi6
114
492
0
0
0
0
1.905'
1,706
1,681
1,560
Source: Defense Environmental Restoration Program Annual Report to Congress for Fiscal Year 1994, Table B-2
A-l
-------
List of All Region 3 DoD Installations Either With Two or Fewer Sites
or Estimated Costs for Cleanup of Less than or Equal to $1 Million
Facility Name
MARYLAND (continued)
NIKE BA-W-44 (WALDORF)
NIKE BAT W-93 (LAYTON)
NIKE W-25 (DAVEDSONVILLE)
NIKE W-35 (GROOM)
NIKE W-36 (GROOM)
NIKE W-54 (POMONKEY).
NIKE W-92 (ROCKVILLE) , .
NDCE W-93 CONTROL AREA
PHOENIX MILITARY RESERVATION
POMONKEY TEST RANGE NRL
Total MARYLAND
PENNSYLVANIA-
- AAF INTELLIGENCE SCH
AIR FORCE PLANT 45
AMSA 112 LOCK HAVEN
AMSA 29 READING
ARMY MAP SERVICE
AVCO
BIRDSBORO ARMY TK FOUNDRY
BRISTOL VETERANS US ARMY RESERVE CTR
CONNELLSVBLLE AIRPORT
CROSS AND H/STONE MOUNTAIN
CROYLAND PLANT
EDGEMONT US ARMY RESERVE CENTER
, ELRAMA ARMORY COMPLEX
ESSINGTON NATIONAL GUARD TARGE RGE
FEDERAL LABORATORIES
HANOVER GAP FILLER ANNEX
JOHNSTOWN SHELL PLANT
MARINE CORPS TRAINING CENTER, PA
MARCO RESERVE CENTER
MARIETTA AIR FORCE STATION
MIDDLETOWN AIR DEPOT
NAVAL INDUSTRIAL RESERVE GEAR PLANT
NAVAL RESERVE CENTER
NAVAL HOSPITAL PHILDALPHIA
NEW CUMBERLAND ARMY DEPOT
NIKE BAT PH-75/78 MEDI'
NIKE PH-15 (BRISTOL)
NIKE PH-67 (CHESTER) ' .
NIKE PH-91 (NORRISTOWN)
NIKE PI-03
NIKE PI-36 (N.HUNTINGDON)
NIKE PI-43 (ELRAMA)
NIRS AM BRIDGE CO
NORTH PENN US ARMY RESERVE CENTER
PLANCOR 400 BETH FGE C
STATE COLLEGE AIR NATIONAL GUARD
SUSQUEHANNA ORDNANCE SUB-DE
TACONY WAREHOUSE
TOBYHANNA ARTILLERY RANGE
US ARMY RESERVE CENTER GERMANTOWN
FFID
MD39799FI38100
MD39799F138700
MD39799F137500
MD39799F137900
MD39799F137800
MD39799F138300
MD39799F138500 '
MD39799F820500
MD321002440200
MD317002431102
PA39799F147700
PA39799F153500
PA32100PA06000
PA32100PA14700
PA39799F887300
PA39799F145100
PA39799F147800
PA32100PA01000
PA39799F155900
PA39799F148300
PA39799F825300
PA32100PA02200
PA321004215000
PA39799F154100
PA39799F841800
PA39799F150600 .
PA39799F808200
PA39799F152900
PA39799F153000
PA39799F150900
PA39799F144500
PA39799F151700
PA39799F152800
PAS 17002725600 .
PA39799F147200
PA39799F146600
PA39799F146400
PA39799F146500
PA39799F146800
PA39799F145700
PA39799F145800
PA39799F146000
PA39799F154800
PA32100PA13900
PA39799F155400
PA357282627300
PA39799F144900
PA321002279200
PA39799F147000
PA321001HN5400
Number
of
Sites
2
2
2
2
2
1
2 .
1
4
1
130
i
l-
8
9
0
2
1
9
2
2
1
15
13
2
1
1
1 '
1
1
5
' -2
1
1
"2
1
2
2
2
1
2
1
2
1
5
1
2'
2
13
2
11
Estimated
, Completion
Date
2008
" 2008-
2008
2008
2008
TBD
2008
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD"
, TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
2008
TBD
2008
TBD
TBD
2008
TBD
TBD
TBD
.TBD
TBD
TBD
2008
, , TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
2008
2008
TBD
TBD '
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
2003
2008
TBD
. 2008
TBD
FY95 Cost
to Complete
$000
2,372
, 1,845
1,560
1,905
1,725
260
1,868
0
0
22
35,444
49
0
. 235
235
10.
" 205
460-
32
2,577
90
2,058
15
0
2,573
10
115
10
"114
431
231
1,598
326
80
0
760
30
1,582
3,025
0
740
0
730'
10
15
75
1,861
4,643
296
3,783
0
Source: Defense Environmental Restoration Program Annual Report to Congress for Fiscal Year 1994, Table B-2
A-2 '
-------
List of All Region 3 DoD Installations Either With Two or Fewer Sites
or Estimated Costs for Cleanup of Less Than or Equal to $1 Million
. Facility Name
PENNSYLVANIA (continued)
. US ARMY RESERVE CENTER HORSHAM 01
US ARMY RESERVE CENTER INDIANA
US ARMY RESERVE CENTER HUNTINGDON
US ARMY-RESERVE CENTER MEADVILLE
US ARMY PITTSBURGH 03
US ARMY STATE COLLEGE
US ARMY RESERVE CENTER WILKES-BARRE
US ARMY RESERVE CENTER WILLIAMSPORT
Total PENNSYLVANIA '
VIRGINIA
AIR FORCE* PLANT 80 '
ALESHIRE QUARTERMASTER DEPOT
ARMY SUPPLY BASE .
, .BUCKROE BEACH / ' '
BYRD FIELD /
CAMP ALEXANDER
CAMP. WALLACE
CAPE CHARLES AFS BUNK
CHOPAWAMic TROOP TRAINING
COMFAIR NORFOLK-NAS .OCEANA
DAM NECK FIRE CONTROL
DEFENSE MAPPING AGENCY HERNDON
. ENGINEER DEPOT
FISHERMAN ISLAND NWR-NF
FORD PLANT
FORT AP HILL , .
FORT LEE ~ ' ...''
FORT MONROE'
. FORT MONROE/FORT WOOL AREA
FORT PICKETT A AIRPORT
JAMES RIVER SHIPBUILDING
LAMB POINT GRD BARRACKS * .
MANASSAS AF COMMUNICATION FAC
MICROWAVE STATION, VA
. MIDLOTHIAN MICRO ST S
N-FOLK DEFNDC BATN-52
NAAS CREEDS -
NAAS PUNGO
NANSEMOND ORDNANCE DEPOT
NAVAL COMMAND FACILITY
NAVAL HOSPITAL PORTSMOUTH . ' ' '
NAVY YARD .-
NEW RIVER ORDNANCE . PLANT-
NIKE N-36
NIKE SITE N-63
.- NIKEW-BA-74
NSY NORFOLK "
OYSTER POINT STORAGE AREA
PETERSBURG AIRPORT
PLUM TREE ISLAND RANGE
QM MARKET CENTER
QM DEPOT, NEWPORT NW
FFBD
PA321001HN3500
PA3210016N3800
PA321001HN3700
PA3210016N4500
PA32I0016N6100
PA3210012N6900
PA3210012N7500
PA3210012N7600
Number
of
Sites
9
4'
6
1
4
6
18
6
187
VA39799F164700
VA39799F164800
VA39799F781000
VA39799F789100
VA39799F165300
VA39799F824200
VA39799F775800
VA39799F156500
VA39799F1 66700
VA39799F170400
VA3 17002293800
VA321002135400
VA39799F823800
VA39799F157300
VA39799F821900
VA321002041600
VA39799F7769CKJ
VA321002060300
VA39799F158300
VA39799F167400
VA39799F17270Q
VA39799F823900
VA39799F171800
VA39799F165800
VA39799F159800
VA39799F161000
VA397.99F775200
VA39799F819800
VA39799F156700
VA39799F854400 .
VA3 1700248 1800
VA39799F173000
VA39799F156900
VA39799F160900
VA39799F156600
VA39799F16750Q
VA39799F172506
VA39799F157800
VA39799F839200
VA39799F167300
VA39799F164900
VA39799F780800.
1
. 1
; 1
1
' 2
1
2
. . , 2
1
1
9
g. .
1
, 1
1
19
4
I
1
2,
. 2
l'
2
1
1
1
1
1
'!
1
'2
1
' '2
' . ' . 2
. 1
1
Estimated
Completion
Date
TBD
TBD
TBD,
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
2008
TBD
2013
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
2008
2005
. TBD
2008
TBD
2008
TBD
TBD
TBD
2008
TBD
2008
TBD
TBD
CTBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
,TBD
2013
TBD
. TBD
FY95Cost
to Complete
$000
0
O
. 0
0
0
0
,0
0
28,994
0
0
1 1Q
150
541
10
2,120
' 135
2,480 -
. 0
566
20
. 10
512
... 10
362 s
92 .
1,983
1,923
319
2,015
,10
1,720
2.
2
385'
1,923 ,
. Q
1,070'
385
1
' 0.
- 0
343
0
0
0
385
389
2,605-
2
10
Source: Defense Environmental Restoration Program Annual Report to. Congress for Fiscal Year 1994, Table B-2
..'' ' ' ' A-3 ' '
-------
List of All Region 3 DoD Installations Either With Two or Fewer Sites
or Estimated Costs for Cleanup of Less Than or Equal to $1 Million
Facility Name
VIRGINIA (continued)
RADIO REC FACILITY
RES TEN CENTER, USCG
RHOAD MIC STATION'SITE
US ARC CHINCOTEAGUE (WALLOPS IS.)
US ARMY RECRUITING COMMAND
VIRGINIA MICROWAVE STATION
VIRGINIA ORDNANCE WORKS
W.H. GROUP NO. 2 & 3
WALLOPS ISLAND
WASHINGTON/BALTIMORE DEF-NIK W-83
WOODROW WILSON GENERAL HOSPITAL
Total VIRGINIA
WE;ST VIRGINIA
DOLLY SODS-NATLANTIFOR
FIKE/ARTEL CHEMICAL
GUTHRIE AIR FORCE STATION
JEFFERSON COUNTY RCV
JEFFERSON COUNTY TRANS
MARSHALL ARMY CHEMICAL PLANT
, NAVAL ORDNANCE PLANT
POINT PLEASANT QMS #6
SYLVANIA ELECTRIC PROD
US ARMY-RESERVE CENTER BLUEFffiLD
US ARMY RESERVE CENTER CLARKSBURG
' US ARMY RESERVE CENTER EAST RAINELLE
US ARMY RESERVE CENTER HUNTINGTON
US ARC PARKERSBURG (AMSA 114)
US ARMY RESERVE CENTER WEIRTON
VETERANS ADMINISTRATION GENERAL HOSP.
WV MANEUVER AREA
YEAGER AIR NATIONAL GUARD BASE
YEAGER AIR NATIONAL GUARD
Total WEST VIRGINIA
Total
FFEO
VA39799F775600
VA39799F854500
VA39799F171500
VA3210015S1200
VA39799F163100
VA39799F162800
VA39799F163700
VA39799F780900
VA39799F169700
VA39799F163800
VA39799F164300
WV39799F346000
WV39799F789200
WV39799F346900
WV39799F346700
WV39799F3470QO
WV39799F348000
WV39799F347700
WV32I005413500
WV39799F347800
WV3210016U0500
WV321Q016U0800
WV3210016U4600
'WV3210016U2000
WV3210026U4300
WV3210016U6400
WV39799F346600
WV39799F346500
WV357282589100
WV39799F711600
Number
of
Sites
l
l
l
5
1
1
,1
1
1 .
1
1
97
i-
2
. 3
1
,. '5
3
'4
. 3 .
,5
3
1
1
5,
2
39
Estimated
Completion
Date
TBD
TBD
TBD
.TBD
TBD
TBD
2011
..TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
1999
2008
TBD
. TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
. TBD
TBD
'" 2015
2003
2004
500
FY95 Cost
to Complete
$000
o
395
0
0
35
2
4,103
10
0
470
0
27,505
1,620
2,228
0
0
0"
205
' °
650
6
0
0
0
0
0
0
'385
12,442
4,281
1,877
19,407
140,029
Source: Defense Environmental Restoration Program Annual Report to Congress for Fiscal Year 1994, Table B-2
A-4
-------
APPENDIX B ,
EPA REGION 3 BROWNFIELDS ECONOMIC REDEVELOPMENT
INITIATIVE FACT SHEETS
-------
-------
U.S. EPA Brownfields Pilots
conomic development and environmental
protection must go nand-in-narid"
Baltimore, MD . "
Birmingham, AL *
Bridgeport, CT . .' *
Cleveland, OH , *
Cape Charles-North Hampton i
County, VA ' *
Detroit, MI . , ^
Indianapolis, IN y
Knoxville,,TN ' .''*
Laredo, TX *
Louisville, KY ^
New Orleans, LA
Oregon Mill Sites, OR
Richmond, VA
Rochester, NY
Sacramento, CA
St. Louis, MO
Trenton, NJ
West Central Municipal Conference, IL
Boston, MA
Buffalo, NY
Dallas, TX
Duwamish Coalition, WA
Illinois
Indiana .
Minnesota
Philadelphia, PA
Pittsburgh, PA
Sand Creek Corridor, CO
West,Jordan, UT
B-l
-------
THIS PAGE IS INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
B-2
-------
unttea
Environmental Protection
Agency
And Public Affairs
(1703)
Environmental News
WEDNESDAY/JULY 26, 1995
CLINTON ADMINISTRATION ANNOUNCES SELECTION OF 15 CITIES AS
' BROWNFIELDS REDEVELOPMENT PROJECTS
/ ' '
',.'.;. . Lauren Mical 202-260-4358
Fifteen cities across the country have been' selected as pilot projects that will
revitalize communities by .redeveloping abandoned/contaimnated industrial/cormnercial
land v town V^br^ to productive local use.
The projects are part of the Clinton Administrations Brownflelds Economic
Redevelopment Initiative, which was launched in November 1993.
The
are targeted to receive $200,000 in funding from the U.S. ^
Environeote^on Agency over two years and are located in: Bmmngham^ Ala.,
Administration initiative.
Brownfields pilot cities are national models for revitalizing urban
undeveloped areas.
EPA Administrator Carol M. Browner said, -This program is a cornerstone of the
the health of our communities, and the health of our economy.
R-138
(more)
B-3
-------
-2- .-..'. '.-..-..
Qty officials, community residents and organizations, financial institutions,
developers and others in the participating cities will work together in each project to:
assess contamination at abandoned inner-city sites,
involve community residents in all aspects of assessment, cleanup and
redevelopment including review of how the land will be used in the future,
leverage other public and private funds to attract economic activity,
resolve liability concerns, and
serve as models for other communities seeking .effective redevelopment
approaches.
The pilots were selected from over 100 applicants after evaluation by a panel that
included representatives from EPA headquarters and regional offices, as well as from the
Department of Commerce's Economic Development Administration.
- The 15 new projects join pilots already in progress in Bridgeport, Conn.;
Cleveland, Ohio; and Richmond, Va. Browner has committed to funding a total of 50
Browpfields pilot projects, with 25 to be funded this year. Applicant cities not selected
in this round will be considered again in the next three rounds of applications. The "
application period for the second round of pilots has closed and applications are being
evaluated by the selection panels. The third and fourth rounds of applications will be
announced starting in fall 1995. The pilots are a major part of a four-part approach to
addressing Browrifields Economic Redevelopment including issues relating to liability
barriers, strengthening partnerships and job development and training.
For more information about the pilot projects, reporters should call Lauren
Milone Mical, EPA Press Office, at 202-260-4358. Public inquiries should be directed to
the RCRA/Superfund Hotline at 1-800-424-9346 or 703-412-9810. '
R-138
# # #
B-4
-------
summary of Brownfields Pilot Projects
- July 26, 1995
The Detroit pilot will marry empowerment zqne activities
with case studies of assessment> cleanup.and redevelopment. The
city will develop a manual explaining how to successfully
redevelop brownfields areas. - .
Laredo/-Texas, will develop an inventory of brownfields
areas and determine extent of contamination in the Paso del Indio
site as well as develop remediation plans, which will encourage
commercial redevelopment. These efforts will also meet
-objectives of NAFTA by cleaning up areas in the Rio Grande
watershed. ;
The Louisville, Ky., .project will use geographic information
systems to target areas for investment and redevelopment and
establish streamlined processes:to achieve voluntary cleanups.
' The Sacramento, Calif., pilot will focus on developing a
streamlined system with all levels of government and the
community to develop a future land use planning and permitting
process in conjunction with cleanup planning, including a
streamlined permit process. . .
The St. Louis, Mo., pilot will complete assessment of a
variety of properties in an incomplete business park and assist
in building a fund to finance cleanups and redevelopment* St.
Louis will form a citizens advisory, council,to ensure community
involvement in the pilot.
. The Trenton, N. J., pilot will develop a council to advise on
assessment, cleanup and redevelopment, perform neighborhood
outreach and target job opportunities where market analyses show
industries suitable for targeted areas.
The Cape Charles, Va., pilot funds the development of a 55
acre eco-ihdustrial park that has been chosen as a demonstration
pilot by the President' s Council on Sustainable Development.
The Knoxville, Tenn., pilot focuses on 25 sites in the inner
city that have been targeted by the city for an urban business
' park. '."..." '''.: '.''.''' '..''"'
The Birmingham, Ala., pilot will help to revitalize 1,000
acres of former .steel and iron industry property.
B-5
-------
The Rochester, N.Y., pilot will establish a user fee
structure for doing environmental assessments. If the program
pays for an assessment of a Brownf ield, and that assessment leads
to redevelopment, the beneficiary would be obligated to repay the
fund, thereby continuing to spark redevelopment and leverage
public-priva.te dollars. -
The Indianapolis, Indi, area has already been active in the
ofiS Jre"a ?nd Wil1 use the fundi«
-------
United States
Environmental Protection
Agency
Office of
Solid Waste and
Emergency Response
Publication: XXXX.X-XXXX
July 1995
EPA Brownfields Pilots
Office of Outreach and Special Projects (5101)
Quick Reference Fact Sheet
EPA's Brownfields Economic Redevelopment Initiative is designed to empower States, communities, and
other stakeholders in economic redevelopment to work together in a timely manner to prevent, assess, safely
clean up, and sustainably reuse brownfields. A brownfield is a site, or a portion thereof/that has actual or
perceived contamination and an active potential for redevelopment or reuse. EPA's Brownfields Initiative
strategies include funding pilot programs and other research efforts, clarifying liability issues, entering into
partaersWps,conducrmgoutreachac£vities,devdopmg job train^
. justice concerns.
OVERVIEW
EPA is awarding 50 Brownfields pilot cooperative
agreements to States; cities, towns, counties, and
Tribes by the end of 1996. The pilots, each funded up
to $200,000 over two years, will test redevelopment
models, direct special efforts toward removing
regulatory barriers withoutsacrificingprotectiveness,
and facilitate coordinated public and private efforts
at the Federal, State, and local levels. Thesefundsare
to be used to generate interest by bringing together
community groups, investors, lenders, developers,
and other affected parties to address the issue of
assessing and cleaning up brownfields and returning
them to appropriate and productive use.
Findings and experience from these pilots will help
guide EPA's efforts to stimulate environmental
cleanup through economic redevelopment. These
findings will be captured in the specific activities
outlined in EPA's evolving. Brownfields Action
Agenda. The pilots will also provide a series of
models forStatesandlocalitiesstrugglingwithsiinilar
efforts.
EVALUATION CRITERIA
States, cities, towns, counties, and Tribes thathaye an
interest in environmentally sound redevelopment of
......
brownfields are invited to apply for pilot grants.
Pilot applications should address the following
criteria: , . '
Environmental and economic impacts of
brownfields on the community;
Existing community commitment to
. brownfields cleanup and redevelopment;
Proposed use of the cooperative agreement.
NationalrepUcabilityoftheproposedproject;
Assurance of the necessary legal authority
and government support for Brownfields
efforts;
Proposed cleanup funding mechanisms;
'Flow of ownership plan;
Community involvement plan
Environmental justice plan;
Proposed measures of success; and
Environmental assessment plan.
ACTIVITIES
EPA Headquarters awarded the first pilot to
Cuyahoga County, OH in November 1993. Two
additional pilots were awarded in 1994 and are
currently underway inBridgeport,CT and Richmond,
VA. ;,' '. ' .;
EPA announced 15 additional pilots in July 1996 and
plans to announce 32 more by September 1996.
B-7
-------
CONTACT
For more information call:
The Superfund Hotline
(800) 424-9346
dEPA
United States
Environmental, Protection
Agency (5202 G)
Washington, DC 20460
Official Business
Penalty for Private Use
S300
B-8
-------
United States
Environmental Protection
Agency
'Office of
Solid Waste and
Emergency Response
Publication: XXXX.X-XXXX
July 1995
EPA
Brownfields Pilot
Baltimore, MD
Office of Outreach and Special Projects (5101)
Quick Reference Fact Sheet
EPA's Brownfields Economic Redevelopment Initiative is designed to empower States, communities, and
other stakeholders in economic redevelopment to work together inatimely manner to prevent, assess, safely
dean up, and sustainably. reuse brownfields. A brownfield is a site, or portion thereof, that has actual or
perceived contamination and an active potential for redevelopment or reuse. EPA plans to fund at least fifty
Brownfields Pilots in 1995 and 1996, at up to $200,000 each, to support creative two-year explorations and
demor*toationsbfbrownfieldssolutions.T^^
and communities with useful information and strategies as they continue to seek new methods to promote
a unified approach to site assessment, environmental cleanup, and redevelopment.
OVERVIEW :
EPA has selected the City of Baltimore for a
Brownfields pilot Many old industrial sites in
Baltimore have been abandoned, causing Baltimore
to lose over 50% of its manufacturing jobs between
1970 and 1990. The threat of contamination and
liability at these sites .has inhibited reuse and
redevelopment The City estimates that 3,500 to
5,300 acres of land zoned for heavy manufacturing
contains environmental problems that impair their
marketability. In particular, the City is concerned
about sites located in Baltimore's Empowerment
Zone, where contamination could present an
additional obstacle to economic revitalizatioru
OBJECTIVES
The ultimate goal of Baltimore's brownfields effort
istoencburageeconomic growth and redevelopment
in urban areas while continuing to provide
appropriate and sufficient protection of the
environment, especially the Chesapeake Bay.
RedevelopmentofurbanareaswiUpromoteefficient
land-use patterns, reduce the air and waterpollution
associated with urban sprawl, and expand job
qpportunitiesinlocationsthatareaccessibletolower-
ihcome populations. To satisfy these objectives, the
incentives and disincentivesforredevelopmentmust
be identified, evaluated, and modified.
ACTIVITIES
Activities planned as part of this pilot include:
Identifying the sources and scope of the
brownfields problem;
""' Defining the legal arid regulatory obstacles
to redevelopment;
Exploring the use of new financing
mechanisms to assist in assessing and
remediating sites; >
Exploring the development of a new
intermediary organization to promote
assessment, cleanup, and redevelopment of
brownfields; ,
Promoting voluntary cleanups; ,
.Developing models for, site remediation
agreements;
Promotingnewtechnologiesforremediation;
, Conducting educational and information-
exchange programs to improve
understanding of brownfields issues; and
o Focusing brownfields efforts and resources
on sites within the Empowerment Zone.
B-9
-------
The cooperative agreement for this pilot has not yet
been negotiated; therefore, activities described in
this fact sheet are subject to change.
CONTACTS
TomStolle . ,
US. EPA - Region 3
(215).597-1166
Evans Paull
City of Baltimore
(410)3964367
&EPA
United States
Environmental Protection
Agency (5202 G)
Washington, DC 20460
Official Business
Penalty for Private Use
$300
B-10
-------
United States
Environmental Protection
Agency
Office of
Solid Waste and
Emergency Response
Publication: XXXX.X-XXXX
July 1995
&EPA Brownfields Pilot -
Cape Charles - Northampton
County, VA
Office of Outreach and Special projects (5101)
Quick Reference Fact Sheet
EPA's Brownfields Economic Redevelopment Initiative is designed to empower States, communities, and
other stakeholders in economic redevelopment to work together in a timely manner to prevent, assess, safely
dean up, and sustainably reuse brownfields. A brownfield is a site, or portion thereof, that has actual or
perceived contamination and an active potential for redevelopment or reuse. EPA plans to fund at least fifty
Brownfields Pilots in 1995 and 1996, at up to $200,000 each, to support creative two-year explorations and
demonstrationsofbrownfields solutions. The Pilotsare intended to provideEPA,States, tribes,municipalities,
and communities with useful information and strategies as they continue to seek new methods to promote
a unified approach to site assessment, environmental cleanup, and redevelopment.
OVERVIEW
EPAhas selected the Town of CapeCharles/County
of Northampton for a Brownfields pilot Cape
Charles is located at the Southern tip of Virginia's
Eastern Shbre on a narrow strip of land between the
Chesapeake Bay and the Atlantic Ocean. The area
boasts rich, farmlands, productive waters, vast
wetiands,andmilesofunspoiledcoastline. However,
27% of the 13,000 people in the area, 47% of whom
are of African-American heritage, live below the
poverty level.
ThePresidenfsCouncilonSustainabieDevelopment
recently selected Cape Charles as one of four sites
for a national Eco-industrial Park demonstration
project, the Cape Charles Sustainable technologies
Industrial Park> which will demonstrate advanced
facilities in resource efficiency arid pollution
prevention. A 55-acre portion of this ecc-industrial
park is a redevelopment area surrounding Cape
Charles Harbor on the Chesapeake Bay. The site
includes a former municipal dump, dockside, and
railyard, and the remains of abandoned industrial
, operations. Thesiteiscriticallylocatedatthegateway
to the proposed eco-industriai park. This site may
contairihazardous substances which threatenpublic
health and the marine environment and must be
addressed before the eco-industrial park Can be
developed.
OBJECTIVES
ThegoaloftheCity'sbrownfieldseffortistofacilitate
the development of the Port of Cape Charles
Sustainable Technologies Industrial Park as a means
of creating sustainable economic development while
protecting thecommunity>s unique natural, cultural,
and historic resources. Specifically, the pilot will
"assess the extent of contamination on the 55-acre
former dump and railyard site and design a
remediationstrategy that willenable the development
of the eco-industrial park to go forward.
Once the pilot project is completed, the redeveloped
brownfield will include the eco-industrial park,
restored wetlands, a nature'trail and environmental
education facility, and a tertiary sewage treatment
system.
ACTIVITIES
The primary focus of this pilot is to provide a full
environmental assessment and remediation strategy
toenable cleanup of this55-acresite and development
of the Port of Cape Charles Sustainable Technologies
Industrial Park. Specific activities planned as part of
this pilot include:
Conducting a phase One assessment of the
site; .
B-ll
-------
Conducting a phase two assessment of the
site; and
Formulating acompleteremediationstrategy
for any contamination found on the site
The cooperative agreement for this pilot has not yet
been negotiated;- therefore, activities described in
this fact sheet are subject to change. '
CONTACTS
Tom Stolle '
U.S. EPA-Region 3
(215)597-1166
Timothy Hayes
County of Norm Hampton/Town of
Cape Charles
(804)678-0477
-3-EPA
United States
Environmental Protection
Agency(5202G)
Washington, DC 20460
Official Business
Penalty for Private Use
$300
B-12
-------
United States
Environmental Protection
Agency
Office of
Solid Waste and
Emergency Response
Publication: XXXX.X-XXXX
July 1995
SEPA Brownfields Pilot -
Richmond, VA
Office of Outreach and Special Projects (5101)
Quick Reference Fact Sheet
EPA^ Brownfields Economic Redevelopment Initiative is designed to empower States, communities, and
other stakeholders in economic redevelopment to work together in a timely manner to prevent, assess, safely
clean up, and sustainably reuse brownfields. A brownfield is a site, or portion thereof, that has actual or
perceived contamination and an active potential for redevelopment or reuse. EPA plans to fund at least fifty
Brownfields Pilots in 1995 and 1996, at up to $200,000 each, to support creative two-year explorations and
demonstrationsofbrownfieldssolutions.IhePilotsareintended to provide EPA, States,Tribes,municipalities,
and communities with useful information and strategies as they continue to seek new methods to promote
a unified approach to site assessment, environmental cleanup, and redevelopment. ;
OVERVIEW
In November 1994, EPA selected the City of
Richmond for a Brownfields pilot Richmond is
considered the birthplace of industrial development
in the South. In recent times however, its older
industrial areas and neighboring residential
communities have experienced private
disinvestment due to environmental risk, among
other factors. The results of this disinvestment have
mdudedpopulationloss,relativelyhighpercentage
of low-moderate income persons, loss of business
and industry, and vacant and underutilized
commercial and industrial properties.
In January 1993, approximately 5,800 acres of city
land in South Richmond was designated by the
Commonwealth of Virginia as a State Enterprise
Zone. Several other neighborhoods in the East and
North sectors of Richmond also meet the
Commonwealth's "distress criteria" and include
sizable amounts of commercial and industrial
properties.
OBJECTIVES
The City of Richmond Office of Economic
Pevelopmenthasfocusedonbrownfieldseconomic
redevelopment for several years and has already
generated business interest in using or developing
sites in targeted areas of the city. The objective of the
Federalsupport of the city's Brownfieldspilotproject
is'to serve as a catalyst in moving the process of
reclaiming vacant business sites forward. The city is
initiating its Brownfields pilot project through
the "comprehensive community, and human
development" concept espoused by the Federal'
Empowerment Zone/Enterprise Community
program. The city is seeking to integrate private
business investment and reuse of inner-aty sites
with solutions to crime, housing, education, and
health.
AcnvrnES
Planned activities funded under Richmond's pilot
cooperative agreement include:
Developing a systematic and cost-effective
means to inventory and market " problem
sites" with development potential;
Conducting pre-development studies of
specific sites to:
- Isolate environmental mitigation
alternatives and costs;
Evaluate commercial and industrial
market reuse options and potential to
inform planning for environmental
response;
- Compare brownfields projects to
competing "greenfields" development
options in the local marketplace to
determine the feasibility of environ^
mental response;
B-13 ... ,
-------
Determine financial shortfalls and
mitigate barriers toward achieving
brownfields redevelopment; and
Utilize existing and new financial
incentives to stimulate brownfields
assessment, cleanup, and redevelop-
ment
Developing Site-specific property recycling
strategy in partnership with current/future
site owners and users, government
regulatory agencies, and the city's develop-
ment staff;
Utilizing Richmond's Neighborhood Teams
Process, a citizen empowerment program, to
bring host residential communities into the
reuse decision making process; and
Developing and implementing a local
program performance evaluation system.
CONTACTS
TomStolle
U.S. EPA-Region 3
(215)597-1166 .
Jim McCarthy
Richmond Dept. of Economic Development
(804)780-5653
wEPA
United States
Environmental Protection
Agency(5202G)
Washington, DC 20460
Official Business ,
Penalty for Private Use
$300
B-14
-------
United States
Environmental Protection
Agency ,
Office of
Solid Waste and
Emergency -Response
Publication: XXXX.X-XXXX
October 1995.
EPA Brownfields Pilot
Philadelphia, PA
Office of Outreach and Special Projects (5101)
Quick Reference Fact Sheet
EPA's Brownfields Economic Redevelopment Initiative is designed to empower States, communities, and
other stakeholders in economicredevelopmentto work together in a timely manner to prevent, assess, safely
clean up, and sustainably reuse brownfields. A brownfield is a site, or portion thereof/that has actual or
perceived contamination, as well as aaactive potential for redevelopment or reuse. EPA plans to fund fifty
Brownfields pilots in 1995 and 1996, at up to $200,000 each, to support creative two-year explorations and
demonstrationsofbrownfields solutions. The pilbtsare intended to provide EPA,States,Tribes,municipalities,
and communities with useful information and strategies as they continue to seek new methods to promote
a unified approach to site assessment, environmental cleanup, and redevelopment . ;
year. PCPC will use the EPA cooperative agreement
to cover project management costs and consulting
services for technical assistance directly related to
specific Environmental Site Assessments (ESA).
BACKGROUND
In May 1995,-'US. EPA Region 3 entered into a
cooperative agreement with the Philadelphia City
Planning Commission (PCPC) and provided $200,000
to fund a Brownfields pilot project The pilot project
plans to undertake a site investigation and
environmental assessment program of abandoned
industrial and commercial sites in the City of
Philadelphia. . .
A declme in Philaddphia'srnanufacturing industry has
lead to a tremendous loss of industrial jobs and the
abandonment of many former manufacturing plants.
Redevelopment of these properties is difficult because
potential buyers are hesitant to purchase mem for fear
of unknown contamination and associated
Becaxisetnerearet^yafewtracteofundevelopedland
remaining for development.in Philadelphia, the City
would prefer to recycle the many brownfields
throughout the dry. .
GOALS
The goal of the PCPC pilot project is to assist in the
conversion of abandbnedbrownfieldsintoproductive
land parcels by developing a timely and flexible
procedure for assessing abandoned sites in areas
targetedforredeveiopment TheCityof Philadelphia
is seeking to improve community involvement and
outreach in these site assessment activities. The pilot
program will be conducted in two phases and will
attempt to identify five sites in the first year for
assessment and up to five additional sites the second
; '. . *', .' ' ' '; . " - -B-
ACTIVITIES
Activities planned under this pilot include:
Selecting 10 eligible ESA sites by creating an
inventory of proposed sites and developing
site selection criteria. The selection criteria
will be based on an analysis of former site
uses, the potential for existmgcontairtination, ,
and the redevelopment and marketing
potential of the site.
Hiring a contractor to perform ESAs of the
selected sites. Each ESA will identify the
nature and-extent of the environmental
contamination and the site's geotechnical
subsurface conditions. If warranted,
remedial action strategies will be prepared
based upon these findings. A descriptive
report (a complete Phase I ESA) of each site
will be prepared and submitted to EPA.
Creating a formal ESA review process by
establishing an interagency Environmental
Audit Review (EAR) team mat will include
dtyagendessuchasthePCTCEnvircTOnehtal
Unit, Environmental Health, the Fire
Department Publk Property, Air Manage-
ment Services, Water Department, and the
US. EPA. All selected sites will undergo an
" ''"
-------
EAR. A descriptive report will be prepared
by the Planning Commission using results
from one of the first five ESA sites. The report
will include a description of the obstacles and
problems encountered during the various
stages of the ESA and development process.
Coordinating wimtheCommerceDepartment
the Philadelphia Industrial Development
Corporation (PIDQ, and the Redevelopment
Authority in an effort to market the selected
sites. PCFC will make site planning recom-
mendations to development agencies, based
onenvironmentalconditionsandconstraints,
and will provide guidance-regarding
specifications formepreparationofnecessary
plans (e.g./site,stonnwater,construction/etc.).
EstablishingaCity-wideEARprocedureupon
completion of the pilot progTE
To facilitate the success of the pilot program, PCFC
has plans .to: (1) Coordinate ESA 'site selection
activities with EPA to eliminate the potential for a
duplication of efforts; (2) Obtain EPA Region 3
technical assistance for the City of Philadelphia on
cleanup standards and technologies; and (3) Ensure
that EPA Region 3. reviews and comments on all
project deliverables.
Public participation in the planning for the reuse of
individual tracts wiUbeconsistentwithgoodplanning
practices and will be in accordance with epdsting
Comprehensive District plans and/or Neighborhood
Plans. Many of the proposed ESA sites Willbe located
in areas within established urban renewal areas.
Reuse plans for many of these areas were developed,
in large part, by neighborhood groups in conjunction
with PCPC Community Planners.
CONTACTS
TomStolle .
US. EPA -Region 3
Philadelphia, PA
(215) 597-1166 '
Marty .Soffer
City of Philadelphia
(215)686-2945
dEPA
United States
Environmental Protection
Agency(5202G)
Washington, DC 20460
Official Business
Penalty for Private Use
$300
B-16
-------
United States
Environmental Protection
Agency
Office of ,
Solid Waste and
Emergency Response
Publication: XXXX.X-XXXXI
October 1995
EPA Brownfields Pilot -
Pittsburgh, PA
Office of Outreach and Special Projects (5101)
Quick Reference Fact Sheet
EPA's Brownfields Economic Redevelopment Initiative is designed to empower States, communities, and
otherstakeholdersineconomkredevdopmenttoworktoge^
clean up, and sustainably reuse brownfields. A brownfield is a site, or portion thereof, that has actual or
perceived contamination/as well as an active potential for redevelopment or reuse. EPA plans to fund nfty
Brownfields pilots in 1995 arid 1996, at up to $200,000 each, to support creative two-year explorations and.
demonstrati
-------
Developing a Brownfields .pilot project CONTACTS
performance evaluation system; . .
TomStolle
Integrating, citizen input throughout the
Brownfields redevelopment process; and
Developing public/private partnerships
through capital formation for financing the
assessment cleanup, and redevelopment of
brownfields.
U.S. EPA - Region 3
Philadelphia, PA
(215) 597-1166
Edward Henry
Urban Redevelopment Authority of Pittsburgh
(412)255-6658
&EPA
United States
Environmental Protection
Agency (5202 G)
Washington, DC 20460
Official Business
Penalty for Private Use
$300
B-18
-------
APPENDIX C
GOVERNMENT CONTRACTS OF POTENTIAL INTEREST TO VENDORS
OF INNOVATIVE REMEDIATION TECHNOLOGIES
-------
-------
GOVERNMENT CONTRACTS OF POTENTIAL INTEREST TO VENDORS
OF INNOVATIVE REMEDIATION TECHNOLOGIES
The typical vendor of innovative technologies will act as a subcontractor on larger prime contracts,.
providing the specialized expertise and technology they sell. Listed below are some of the major
Federal contract vehicles that are used to perform remediation. Included are contracts let by EPA, -
the Naval Facilities Engineering Command, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USAGE), and the
Air Force. Where available, the name and address of the prime contractor is provided below. Based
on discussions with the various prime contractors, information is provided regarding the marketing
approach each company prefers. .'-.. ' - '
Alternative Remedial Contract Strategy (ARCS). This is an EPA regional contract vehicle that is
used toinvestigate and clean up abandoned hazardous waste .sites. It is used to support remedial
investigations, feasibility studies, remedial alternative evaluation and design, construction
management; and other activities. In Region 3, there are five ARCS prime contractors: NUS/Brown
& Root, Black & Veatch, CH2M Hill, Ecology & Environment, and Tetra Tech. Vendors can
contact the EPA Region 3 office for information about the vehicle. - -
Superfund Technical Assistance and Response Team (START). This, too, is a regional vehicle
that supports the investigation and cleanup of abandoned hazardous waste sites: Vendors can contact
the EPA Region 3 office for information on the contract.
In Region 3, EPA has awarded the START contract to Roy F. WestOn, Inc. Opportunities for the
application of innovative technologies may be available through this contract. Vendors may forward
. information to:
Roy F. Weston, Inc. : .,
5 Underwood Court . ' .,
! Delran, NJ 08075. V , '''.",',
Attn: GregJaniek '
Technical Support to the Superfund Innovative Technology Evaluation (SITE) Program. This is
a national contract designed to help in the testing and development of innovative technologies. There
are two programs: the emerging technologies program, which funds vendors in small-scale tests, and
"-.';.. ' ' c-i . -" ' . -" .' ; -
-------
the technology demonstration program, which funds full-scale technology evaluations and expects
vendors to share costs. Vendors are encouraged to apply to the SITE Program at the National Risk
Management Research Laboratory (NRMRL) pf EPA's Office of Research and Development in
Cincinnati, Ohio. The address for both program offices and contact name and phone numbers appear
below. . .. . .
EPA Office of Research and Development
26 West Mali-tin Luther King Drive
Cincinnati, OH 45268
Emerging Technology Program
Randy Parker, Norma Lewis
(513) 569-7665
Demonstration Program
Annette Gatchette
(513)569-7697
Total Environmental Restoration Contracts (TERC). These vehicles are managed by the operating
divisions of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USAGE). As the name suggests, the intent is to
provide complete remediation services. Any U.S. Army installation may use the vehicle.
The USAGE Omaha District has awarded a TERC contract to IT Corporation, which provides a
vehicle for investigation and remedial work ta be done predominantly on Air Force bases in Georgia,
North Carolina, South Carolina, and. Virginia. IT Corporation accepts information from vendors and
based on a preliminary review of the technology type, responds by sending vendors a pre-qualification
package for approved vendor listing, information should be sent to:
IT Corporation
312 Directors Drive '' '
Knoxville, TN 37923 .
, Attn: Dan Duncan "
' b '*'<-''
The USAGE Baltimore District has awarded a contract for work to be done especially for. Picatinny
Arsenal (New Jersey) and Aberdeen Proving Ground (Maryland) and other Region 3 states to IGF
Kaiser Engineers. , . '...,.
C-2
-------
Technical Support to the Comprehensive Long-Term Environmental Action Navy (CLEAN).
This vehicle is managed by the Naval Facilities Engineering Command (NAVFACENGCOM) Field
Divisions, It provides engineering and technical support for all aspects of the Navy's environmental
program, including remedial action. .
In Region 3, the Atlantic Division (LANTDIV) in Norfolk, Virginia, has awarded a CLEAN contract
to Michael Baker Corporation/Baker Environmental.. Baker Environmental invites innovative
technology vendors to its Coraopolis, Pennsylvania, facility for presentations. Vendors can arrange
presentation dates with Ray Wattras at (412) 269-2016, Daniel Bonk at (412) .269-2063, Tarnmi
Halapin at (412) 269-2023, or Art Robb at (412) 269-6008. Information can be forwarded to: i
Baker Environmental .
Airport Office Park, Building 3 . .
420 Rouser Road. .
. Coraopolis, PA 15108
The Northern Division (NORTHDIV) in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, has awarded a CLEAN contract,
to Brown & Root Environmental. Opportunities for the application of innovative technologies may be
available through this contract. Vendors may forward information to:
. Brown & Root Environmental
993 Old Eagle School Road, Suite 415
Wayne, PA 19087 . ' ,
Attn: Daniel Braccia .. ;
(610)971-0900
these contracts represent some of the major vehicles available that support remediation work and
therefore can use innovative technologies. Since most of the contracts are regional, vendors may
wish to identify the prime contractor in the region of interest to present the capabilities of their
technologies. '-'.'''. ,
C-3
-------
-------
APPENDIX D
REFERENCES
-------
-------
-.'" . . . REFERENCES * : *
Agency Information Consultants. 1995. State ^Superfund" databases for Delaware, Maryland, and
Pennsylvania. May.
PRC
Water Division. May 17.
r'n>RO 1995a Record of Telephone Conversation Between
^^
PRC 1995b Record of Telephone Conversation Between .Emily Dirkson, Analyst, and Chris Byer,
^rgini. TDepartment of Envirormiental Qudity, Water DivisM, Northern Regioml Office, .
May 17. / , . .
PRC 1995c Record of Telephone Conversation Between Emily Dirkson, Analyst and Marlee
Parker VuSa Department of Environmental Quality, Water Division, Piedmont Regional
Office. May 17. . ' . - .; ' ; : " ' .'
Record of Telephone Conversation Between Emily Dirkson, Analyst, and Gene
'rgta^^
"office:May 17.-, . ;
e Record of Telephone Conversation Between Emily Dirkson, Analyst and Horacio
^^ -
'May'17. ' . ' . .. ' ,. .._.'.. ;'.. '' , r '' ":
Record : of Telephone Conversation Between Emily Dirkson, Analyst, and Pam Hayes,
VSa Department of Environmental Protection, Office of Waste Management, Site
Investigation and Response Division. 'May 17. ,
May 18. .
:
Office. May 18. - .
PRC 19951 Record of Telephone Conversation Between Emily Dirkson Analyst, and C. Bruce
Davidson' Virginia Department of Environmental Quality, Water Division, West Central
Regional Office. May 19. . . r . -
of Air and Waste Management. May 21.
PRC 1995k. Record of Telephone Conversation Between Emily
Kordelly, Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Quality. May 21.
D-l
-------
PRC. 19951. Record of Telephone Conversation Between Emily Dirkson, Analyst, and Kevin
Green, Virginia Department of Environmental Quality, Office of Federal Facility and
Superfund Programs. May 21. . . , .
PRC. 1995m. Record of Telephone Conversation Between Patricia White, Policy Analyst, and Alice
Scanin, Maryland Department of Environment. May 22. _
PRC. 1995n. Record of Telephone Conversation Between Patricia White, Policy Analyst, and
Gregory Hope, District of Columbia Department of Hazardous Waste. May 26.
PRC. 1995o. Record of Telephone Conversation Between Patricia White, Policy Analyst, and Ellen
Malenfant, Delaware Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Control, Division
of Air and Waste Management. May 29.
PRC. 1995p. Record of Telephone Conversation Between Emily Dirkson,' Analyst, and Daniel .
Manweiler, Virginia, Department of Environmental Quality, Water Division, Southwest
Regional Office. May 30. . "
PRG. 1995q. Record of Telephone Conversation Between Emily Dirkson, Analyst, and Les Mullins,
West Virginia Department of Environmental Protection, Office of Waste Management
Underground Storage Tank Program. May 31.
PRC. 1995r. Record of Telephone Conversation Between Emily Dirkson, Analyst, and Paul
Duncan, West Virginia Department of Environmental Protection, Office of Waste
Management, Underground Storage Tank Program. May 31.
PRC. 1995s. Record of Telephone Conversation Between Emily Dirkson, Analyst, and N.V. -.
Raman, Delaware Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Control, Division of
Air and Waste Management. June 1.
PRC. 1995t. .Record of Telephone Conversation Between Cecile Batchelor, Analyst, and G.S.
Atwal, West Virginia Department of Environmental Protection,. Office of Waste Management.
June 16. '. .
PRC. 1995u. Record of Telephone Conversation Between Cecile Batchelor, Analyst, and David
Long, West Virginia Department of Environmental Protection, Office Underground Storage
TanksJune 16. . .'--,.
PRC. 1995v. Record of Telephone Conversation Between Cecile Batchelor, Analyst, and Mark Cox,
Maryland Department of the Environment, Waste Management Administration. June 20.
PRC. 1995w. Record of Telephone Conversation Between Cecile Batchelor, Analyst, and Caroll
Gather, West Virginia Department of Environmental Protection,.Office of Enforcement.
June 23.
PRC. 1995x. Record of Telephone Conversation Between Cecile Batchelor, Analyst, and Bill
Rheinlander, West Virginia Department of Environmental Protection, Office of Enforcement.
July 19. , .
D-2
-------
PRC. 1995y. Record of Telephone Conversation Between Patricia Whites Analyst, and Tom
Modena, Virginia Department of Environmental Quality, Superfund Program. November 27,
U.S. Department of Defense (DoD). 1995. Defense Environmental Restoration Program Annual
Report to Congress for Fiscal Year 1994, March.
U.S. Department of Energy (DOE). 1993. Environmental Restoration and Waste Management 5-Year
'. ' Plan, Fiscal Years 1994-1998, Volumes I and II. DE93-005892 and DE93-004731. January.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). 1992a. National Survey of Underground Storage
Tanks. Office of Underground Storage Tanks. Spring.
EPA, 1992b. TC IToxidty'Characteristic] Study of Petroleum Contaminated Media. Office of ;
Underground Storage Tanks. Draft, July. T
EPA. 1993a. An Analysis of State Superfund Programs: 50-State Study, 1993 Update. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response. EPA 540-R-94-008. December.
EPA. 1993b. Cleaning Up the Nation's Waste Sites: Markets and Technology Trends. Office of
. Solid Waste and Emergency Response. EPA 542-R-92-012. April.
EPA. 1994, LandView II database. Office of Solid Waste arid Emergeiicy Response, Chemical
Emergency Preparedness and Prevention Office in conjunction with the Department of
Commerce, Bureau of the Census. September. ; . -
EPA. 1995a. Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Information
System (CERCLIS) database. Office of Emergency and Remedial Response, Office of
Program Management. May. '
EPA. 1995b. Innovative Treatment Technologies: Annual Status Response, (Seventh Edition).
Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response. EPA 542-R-95-008. September.
EPA, 1995c. "LandView Factsheet." .Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response.
550-F-95-003. AprU, . .. .
EPA. 1995d. National Priorities List Site Summaries. Office of Emergency and Remedial
Response. May. .
EPA. 1995e. ^"Quarterly Activity Reports for the Third Quarter of FY95." Office of Underground
Storage Tanks. September. .- -
EPA. 1995f. Resource Conservation and Recovery Information System (RCRIS) Regional Oversight
database for Region 3. Office of Solid Waste, Communications, Analysis and Budget
Division, Information Management Branch. May. ;.
EPA. 1995g. Responsive Electronic Link Access Interface (RELAI) database. Office of .Emergency
and Remedial Response, Office of Program Management, May.
EPA. 1995h. "VISITT.4.0 Bulletin." Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response, Technology
Innovation Office. EPA 542-N-95-008. July: .
.'" "- D-3 ' '
-------
D-4
------- |