vvEPA
            United States
            Environmental Protection
            Agency
                    Solid Waste and
                   Emergency Response
                      (5102W)
EPA 542-R-96-002
   March 1996
Vendor  Information Form
(VIF) 5.0
            To be completed for participation in the
            Vendor Information System
            for Innovative Treatment
            Technologies (VISITT)
            Version  5.0
            Note: Instead of submitting this form, you may provide information on your
                technology(ies) electronically. You can obtain the electronic VIF by
                electronic mail or download it from EPA's CLU-IN bulletin board system.
                You also can call the VISITT help line to request a 3.5" IBM-compatible
                diskette. See Section V, page ii for details.	
            Completion of this form is voluntary. If you have any questions, call the
            VISITT Help Line at 800/2454505 or 703/287-8927.
                                             Primed on Recycled Paper

-------
THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK

-------
                                 TABLE OF CONTENTS

Section

GENERAL INFORMATION

         I.     What is VISITT?
        II.     What Innovative Technologies are
               Eligible for Inclusion?
        III.     Should Confidential Business Information (CBI)
               be Submitted?  ......
        IV.     Submittal of Process Flow Diagram or Schematic  ...................   ii

        V.     Electronic Submittal of Vendor
               Information Form  .......................................   u

        VI.     When and Where to File ...................................   ii

       VII.     EPA's Authority for Submittal and Burden Statement  ................    in

      VIII.     Vendor Information Form  ...................................   1

               Part 1: General Information and Technology Overview  ................   1
               Part 2: Full-Scale Equipment/Capabilities ........................   U
               Part 3: Pilot-Scale Equipment/Capabilities  .......................   14
               Part 4: Treatability Study Capabilities (Bench Scale)  .................   16
               Part 5: Representative Applications, Client References,
                      and Performance Data ...............................   17
               Part 6: Literature and Technical References  ......................   27

 Appendices

 A      BUSINESS CLASSIFICATION INFORMATION ......................... A-l

 B      KEY TO CONTAMINANT GROUPS  ................................ B-l

 C      LIST OF VISITT 4.0 VENDORS BY TECHNOLOGY   ..................... C-l

-------
GENERAL INFORMATION

I.      What is VISTIT?

        Vendor Information System for Innovative Treatment Technologies (VISITT) is a service offered
        by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) Technology Innovation Office (TIO) to
        promote the use of certain categories of innovative technologies for the treatment of contaminated
        ground water  and soil.   Version 4.0, which was  released in August  1995, contains 325
        technologies provided by 204 vendors.  The goal of the database  is to foster  communication
        between technology vendors and users by providing information on the availability, performance,
        and cost associated with the application of treatment technologies. VISITT is intended to inform
        federal, state,  and private-sector  remediation professionals  of  their cleanup options  and the
        capabilities of firms to provide innovative remediation services.

II.     What Innovative Technologies are Eligible for Inclusion?

        Eligible technologies are those that are:

                A.      Innovative, that is, technologies that lack cost and performance data and are not
                        commonly  applied when  their use  can  provide better,  more cost-effective
                        performance than conventional methods

                B.      Designed to treat contaminated soil, sludge, sediments, solid-matrix and to treat
                        groundwater or non-aqueous phase liquids (NAPL)  in situ.  Technologies that
                        treat groundwater ex situ, incineration, and  solidification/stabilization  are not
                        eligible.
             PARTIAL LIST OF INNOVATIVE TREATMENT TECHNOLOGIES OF INTEREST
   Acid Extraction
   Adsorption - In Situ
   Air Sparging - In Situ Ground Water
   Bioremediation - In Situ Ground Water
   Bioremediation - In Situ Lagoon
   Bioremediation - In Situ Soil
   Bioremediation - Not Otherwise Specified
   Bioremediation - Slurry Phase
   Bioremediation - Solid Phase
   Bioventing
   Chemical Treatment - Dechlorination
   Chemical Treatment - In Situ Ground Water
   Chemical Treatment - Other
   Chemical Treatment - Oxidation/Reduction
   Delivery/Extraction Systems
   Dual-Phase Extraction
Electrical Separation
Electro - Thermal Gasification - In Situ
Magnetic Separation
Materials Handling/Physical Separation
Off-Gas Treatment
Pneumatic Fracturing
Pyrolysis
Slagging - Off-Gas Treated
Soil Flushing - In Situ
Soil Vapor Extraction
Soil Washing
Solvent Extraction
Surfactant Enhanced Recovery - In Situ
Thermal Desorption
Thermally Enhanced Recovery - In Situ
Vitrification

-------
       Suppliers of separate components of a treatment technology (such as bacteria for bioremediation)
       will not be listed in the database.   EPA will determine whether a technology is eligible for
       inclusion, if so requested  by the vendor.  Questions about eligibility of technologies can be
       directed to the VISIT! help line at 800-245-4505  or  703-287-8927.   Some of the eligible
       technologies, as included in VISITT 4.0, are listed on the previous page.

III.    Should Confidential Business Information be Submitted?

       Submittal  of technology information for participation in VISITT is voluntary, and submittals
       should not include confidential business information.  EPA considers information in the database
       public information, and if so requested, will release all such information.  However, if a vendor
       wishes to provide general information on confidential projects to highlight business experience,
       the vendor may elect to use generic descriptions (for example, "organic chemical manufacturer").

IV.    Submittal of Process Flow Diagram or Schematic

       Please provide a  flow chart  or schematic of the treatment process, showing the equipment
       necessary  for  each step.  To ensure that schematics are legible in the final system, EPA
       recommends that schematics be submitted in a Bitmap (BMP), Tag Image File (TIP) or PCX
       electronic format.  If an electronic copy is not available, a camera-ready hard copy suitable for
       computer scanning can be submitted.

V.     Electronic Submittal of Vendor Information Form

       Instead  of submitting this  form,   you  may provide  information  on  your  technology(ies)
       electronically.  To do so, you can download an electronic version of  the  VISITT Vendor
       Information Form (VIF) from EPA's Cleanup Information (CLU-IN) Bulletin Board System
       (BBS) at  (301) 589-8366, or you can obtain the VIF by  electronic mail (send requests to
       cassidt@prcemi.com).  You also can obtain the electronic version on a 3.5"  IBM-compatible
       diskette by calling the VISITT help line at 800-245-4505 (DOS 3.3 or higher is needed to operate
       the software).  For electronic submittals, a diskette containing the completed VIF, along with a
       hard copy printout of the completed  form, should be  mailed to the address below.

VI.    When and Where to File

       Submittal  deadline is June 30, 1996  for inclusion in VISITT 5.0,  which is scheduled for release
       in November 1996.  Submittals received after the deadline will be reviewed as time and resources
       permit.

       Send  completed VIFs or diskettes to:

              System Operator, VISITT
              PRC Environmental Management, Inc.
              1593 Spring Hill Road, Suite 300
              Vienna, VA 22182

       Electronic submittals should be compressed and e-mailed to cassidt@prcemi.com.

-------
VII.   EPA's Authority for Submitted and Burden Statement

       EPA's authority for conducting this fifth Invitation for Submittal is set forth under section 311
       of the Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization Act of 1986 (42 U.S.C. 9601 et seq.).  Under
       section 311,  EPA may  collect and  disseminate information related to  the  use  of innovative
       treatment technologies for remediation of hazardous waste sites.

       EPA estimates that the vendor reporting burden for this collection of information will average
       25 hours per respondent for one original submittal, and 13 hours per respondent for an updated
       submittal  These estimates include the time applicants will require to review and maintain the
       data needed and to complete  and review the VIF.  Send comments  regarding this estimate of
       burden or any other aspect of reducing the burden, to Chief, Information Policy Branch, PM-
       2^3 US EPA, 401 M Street, SW, Washington, DC 20460; and to Paperwork Reduction Project
       (OMB#2050-6ll4), Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Office of Management and
       Budget, Washington, DC 20503.
                                               in

-------
THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK

-------
                            VENDOR INFORMATION FORM

              PART 1: GENERAL INFORMATION AND TECHNOLOGY OVERVIEW

1.   Date Submitted	/	/	
2a.  Developer/Vendor Name	.		

2b.  Is this an update of a technology listed in VISITT Version 4.0 ?   Yes  Q   No LJ

     If yes, specify technology and vendor name that appeared in VISITT 4.0 if different from the
     information in this update.
 For VISITT Version 4.0 Vendors: Questions 2c and 2d are intended to gather information on the
 use of VISITT in the remediation community.

 2c. Please provide a ro.ugh estimate of the total number or frequency of inquiries your company
     has received through your inclusion in VISITT.		_
 2d. Has your company performed work (either for a fee or free), such as a treatability study,
     pilot-scale study, or field demonstration, as a result of those inquiries.   LJ  Yes   LJ  No
  Please provide details, if possible.
2e.   Please list your primary Standard Industrial Classification (SIC) code and check the appropriate
      business classification for each code.   Refer to Appendix A-1 for business classification
      definitions.
     SIC code.
     SIC code
Q Small   Q Other Than Small Q Disadvantaged/Minority Q Women-owned
Q Small   Q Other Than Small Q Disadvantaged/Minority Q Women-owned
 3.   Street Address
 4.   City
 5.   Country
 6.  a. Contact Name(s) _

     b. Contact Title(s)

 7.  Contact Phone  (   )_

 9.  E-mail Address	
                                       State/Province
                                              Zip Code
                     ext.
8. Fax Number (   )_
 10. Home Page Address

-------
                                                                    Vendor Name
                                                                 Technology Type
            PART 1:  GENERAL INFORMATION AND TECHNOLOGY OVERVIEW (continued)
  11.  Technology Type.  Check one only.  Fill out a separate form for each additional technology.
a
a
a

a

a

a

a

a
a
a
Acid Extraction
Adsorption - In Situ
Air Sparging - In
Situ Ground Water
Bioremediation - in
Situ Ground Water
Bioremediation - In
Situ Lagoon
Bioremediation - In
Situ Soil
Bioremediation -
Not Otherwise
Specified
Bioremediation -
Slurry Phase
Bioremediation -
Solid Phase
Bioventinq
Q

a

a

a

a

a
a
a
a
a

                                             Chemical Treatment -
                                             Dechlorination
                                             Chemical Treatment - In
                                             Situ Ground Water
                                             Chemical Treatment -
                                             Other
                                             Chemical Treatment -
                                             Oxidation/Reduction
                                             Delivery/Extraction
                                             Systems
                                             Dual-Phase Extraction
                                             Electrical Separation
                                             Electro-Thermal
                                             Gasification - In Situ
                                             Magnetic Separation
                                             Materials
                                             Handling/Physical
                                             Separation
a
a
a
a

a
a
a
a
a

a
a

a
a
Off-Gas Treatment
Pneumatic Fracturing
Pyrolysis
Slagging - Off-Gas
Treated
Soil Flushing - In Situ
Soil Vapor Extraction
Soil Washing
Solvent Extraction
Surfactant Enhanced
Recovery - In Situ
Thermal Desorption
Thermally Enhanced
Recovery - In Situ
Vitrification - General
Other (specify)

 12a. Technology Name Assigned By Vendor  (if different than name listed in Question 11).
 12b. Registered trademark?           Q  Yes     Q  No

 12c. Does the vendor hold an exclusive license?  Q  Yes      Q No
 13.   Patents

      a. Is technology patented?           Q  Yes      Q  No

      b. Is patent pending?                Q  Yes      Q  NO

14.   Superfund Innovative Technology Evaluation (SITE) Program.

      a. Is this technology being tested, or has this technology been tested, in EPA SITE Emerging Technology Program?

                                      Q Yes     Q  No
      b. Is this technology being tested, or has this technology been tested, in EPA SITE Demonstration Program?

                                      Q  Yes     Q  No

-------
                                                                  Vendor Name

                                                               Technology Type
          PART 1:  GENERAL INFORMATION AND TECHNOLOGY OVERVIEW (continued)

15.  Description of Technology.  In 300 words or less, describe the treatment process,  including
     scientific principles on which the technology is based; key treatment steps; unique and innovative
     features; whether full-scale system is/will be batch, continuous, or semicontinuous; and whether
     the technology is above ground or in situ.  Parts 2 and 3 allow more detail for full- and pilot-scale
     systems.  Provide a flow chart or schematic of the treatment process, showing the equipment
     necessary  for each  step.   To ensure  the schematics are  legible  in the  final  system, EPA
     recommends  that schematics  be submitted in a Bitmap (BMP), Tag  Image File (TIF) or PCX
     electronic  format.  If an electronic copy is not available, a camera-ready hard copy suitable for
     computer scanning can be  submitted as an alternative.
                                               EXAMPLE

                                        Description of Technology

     ABC Corporation has developed an innovative solvent extraction technology (SUPER) that uses Super Chemical as
     the solvent. Super Chemical is a biodegradable solvent.

     The key to success of this process is Super Chemical's property of inverse miscibility; below 65 degrees F, Super
     Chemical is soluble in water (hydrophilic) and above 65 degrees F, it is insoluble in water (hydrophobia). Therefore,
     cold Super Chemical can extract water and water-soluble compounds, and warm Super Chemical can extract
     organic contaminants, such  as PCBs, pesticides, PAHs, SVOCs, and VOCs.

     Within  the unit, the soil is washed continuously with Super Chemical in a counter-current  process.  The
     contaminants dissolve in the solution and are removed from the soil by the counter-current flow. The contaminated
     solvents are reclaimed in a closed-loop circuit, eliminating the need for large volumes of solvent.  The clean, washed
     soil is moved to a closed-loop  dryer system, where any excess solvent is removed from the soft.  When the soil
     exits the system, it is relatively free of organics and dry. The collected contaminant from the solvent washing is
     concentrated 1,000 to 10,000 times, reducing its volume and its associated disposal costs, and is pumped
     periodically from the system into labeled 55-gallon drums for conventional off-site disposal.

     Emissions of organic vapors to air are controlled and treated by a carbon absorption system.

-------
                                                       Vendor Name
                                                    Technology Type
        PART 1: GENERAL INFORMATION AND TECHNOLOGY OVERVIEW (continued)
15.  Description of Technology (continued).

-------
                                                                   Vendor Name

                                                                Technology Type
          PART 1:  GENERAL INFORMATION AND TECHNOLOGY OVERVIEW (continued)

16.  Technology Highlights.  In 200 words or less, describe the technology in terms of contaminants
     treated, performance,  implementation, or  cost.   Include the key  marketable  features of  the
     technology, such as treatment niche and advantages over other technologies.
                                               EXAMPLE

                                          Technology Highlights

       The SUPER solvent extraction process can treat soils, sludges,  and sediments contaminated with  PCBs,
       carcinogenic PAHs, pesticides, and VOCs at 20% to 40% of incineration costs.  Treated products from the
       SUPER process include: water suitable for discharge, oil for recycle as fuel, and solids that can be returned to
       the site as backfill.  The process also can reduce the initial volume of contaminated material by as much as
       90%.

       The SUPER solvent extraction process operates at near ambient pressures and temperatures, uses off-the-shelf
       process equipment, and controls air emissions.  The extraction efficiency (organic removal efficiency) achieved
       is as high as 99%.

       Solvent recovery is also greater than 99%. The process can treat up to 300 tons per day of contaminated soil.
       This technology is well accepted by communities because air emissions are minimized.

-------
                                                                  Vendor Name
                                                               Technology Type
          PART 1:  GENERAL INFORMATION AND TECHNOLOGY OVERVIEW (continued)
17.  Technical Limitations.  In 200 words or less, describe the technical limitations such as specific
     contaminants or contaminant combinations, temperature, moisture content, or chemical properties
     of the contaminant, that could adversely affect applicability or performance.
                                              EXAMPLE

                                         Technology Limitations

      The SUPER process is not applicable for metal-only, (e.g., radioactive) or other inorganic wastes, but its
      performance is not affected by inorganics at low concentrations.  This process may require screening or
      crushing to 0.25 inch, and other feed preparation operations, depending on the waste. The extraction efficiency
      of an organic contaminant will depend on its solubility in the solvent. The solvent used is best suited for PCBs
      and pesticides.

-------
                                                                 Vendor Name

                                                              Technology Type
          PART 1:  GENERAL INFORMATION AND TECHNOLOGY OVERVIEW (continued)

18.  Other Comments. In 200 words or less, provide additional information about the technology, such
     as its history, status, capabilities, and experience and applicable permits obtained (for example,
     TSCA  or RCRA).   Also describe plans  for future  development of the  technology, including
     diversification of media and/or contaminants treated.
                                              EXAMPLE

                                           Other Comments

      The SUPER process has been demonstrated successfully at bench scale, pilot scale, and full scale. A full-scale
      SUPER unit was used to treat sludges contaminated with PCBs at the BAD Oil Refinfng Superfund site.

      Two pilot-scale units have been built.  One was operated under the SITE program to treat soils and sludges
      contaminated with PCBs.

      Bench-scale treatability studies have  been conducted  on contaminated  soils containing  petrochemical
      compounds, pharmaceutical compounds, pesticides, PCBs, and wood preserving wastes containing PAHs.

-------
                                                                    Vendor Name
                                                                 Technology Type
          PART 1:  GENERAL INFORMATION AND TECHNOLOGY OVERVIEW (continued)
19.  Technology Scale.   Check only one.
     status of the technology.
Using the following  definitions, indicate the operational
     a.  I  I Full scale.  Available equipment is sized and commercially available for actual site remediation.  (If you select full
           scale, you must fill out Pan 2).

     b.  l_l Pilot scale.  Available equipment is of sufficient size to verify technology feasibility or establish the design and
           operating conditions for a full-scale system.  However, it is not of the size typically used for a cleanup. (If you
           select pilot scale, you must fill out Part 3).

     c.  L_l Bench scale or emerging. Technology has been shown to be feasible through the use of bench-top equipment in
           the laboratory. Data from these studies cannot be used to scale up the technology to full scale.
20.  Media treated.   Check "actual" for all media that have been treated by your technology. Check
     "potential" for  all media to which the technology may be applied in the future.
                            Soil (in situ)
                            Soil (ex situ)
                            Sludge (does not include municipal sewage sludge)
                            Solid (for example, slag)
                            Natural  sediment (in situ)
                            Natural  sediment (ex situ)
                            Ground  water (in situ) [Includes treatment of ground water and/or saturated soil]
                            Off-gas  generated from a primary innovative treatment technology
                            Dense nonziqueous phase liquids (DNAPL) [in situ]
                            Light nonaqueous phase liquids (LNAPL) [in situ]
Actual
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
Potential
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
21.    Contaminants and Contaminant Groups Treated.  Check all that may apply.  Check "actual" for
       all that have been treated by your technology (that is, data exist). Check "potential" for all that
       the technology may be applied to in the future. Data for actual contaminants treated should be
       included in Part  5 (see Appendix B  for  key  to  contaminant groups).  If your  technology is
       materials handling/physical  separation, delivery/extraction, or if  you are an equipment vendor,
       this question may not apply.
        Actual Potential
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
                     Halogenated volatiUss
                     Halogenated semivolatiles
                     Nonhalogenated volatiles
                     Nonhalogenated semivolatiles
                     Organic pesticides/herbicides
                     Dioxins/furans
                     PCBs
                     Polynuclear aromatics (PNA)
                     Solvents
                     Benzene-toluene-ethylbenzene-
                     xylene (BTEX)
                     Acetonitrile (organic cyanide)
                     Organic acids
                                                         Actual Potential
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
Heavy metals
Nonmetallic toxic elements
Radioactive metals
Asbestos
Inorganic cyanides
Inorganic corrosives
Miscellaneous
            L_l    LJ  Explosives/propellants
            L_l    LJ  Organometallic pesticides/herbicides
            Q    Q Other
                             (specify)

-------
                                                                    Vendor Name


                                                                 Technology Type
          PART 1:  GENERAL INFORMATION AND TECHNOLOGY OVERVIEW (continued)



22.  Industrial Waste Sources or Site Types of Sites Treated.  Check all that may apply.  Check

     "actual" for all that have been treated by your technology (that is, data exist). Check

     "potential" for all that the technology may be applied to in the future.  Treatment data should

     be available for those sites  for which "actual" is checked.  See Table A for wastes typically

     associated with each industry.
        Actual Potential
         a
         a
         a
         a
         a
         a
         a

         a
         a
         a
         a
         a
         a
a
a
a
I—I  Agriculture


LJ  Battery recycling/disposal


LJ  Chloro-alkali manufacturing


    Coal gasification


    Dry cleaning


    Electroplating


I	I  Gasoline service

    station/petroleum storage facility


LJ  Herbicide manufacturing/use


O  Industrial landfills


L_l  Inorganic/organic pigments


I	I  Machine shops


I	I  Metal ore mining and smelting


LJ Municipal landfill
                                                        Actual Potential
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
                                                a
                                                a
                                                a
    Munitions manufacturing


    Paint/ink formulation


    Pesticide manufacturing/use


LJ Petroleum refining and reuse


LJ Photographic products


    Plastics manufacturing


    Pulp and paper industry


LJ Other organic chemical manufacturing


LJ Other inorganic chemical manufacturing


LJ Semiconductor manufacturing


LJ Rubber manufacturing


LJ Wood preserving


LJ Uranium mining
a
a
                                                          a     a
                                                    Others (specify)
 23.  Vendor Services.  Check all that apply.




      LJ Equipment manufacturer


      LJ Subcontractor for cleanup services


      LJ Prime contractor for full-service remediation


      LJ Other (specify)	.	

-------
                                                     Vendor Name
                                                   Technology Type
   PART 1:  GENERAL INFORMATION AND TECHNOLOGY OVERVIEW (continued)

                                  Table  A                              ~

              Contaminants/Wastes  Associated With Industrial Waste
                           Sources or Types of Sites
1.     Agriculture
2.     Battery recycling/disposal
3.     Chloro-alkali manufacturing
4.     Coal gasification
5.     Dry cleaning
6.     Electroplating
7.     Herbicide manufacturing/use
8.     Industrial landfills
9.     Inorganic/organic pigments
10.   Machine shops
11.   Metal ore mining and smelting
12.   Municipal landfills
13.   Munitions manufacturing
14.   Paint/ink formulation
15.   Pesticide manufacturing/use
16.   Petroleum refining and reuse
17.   Photographic products
18.   Plastics manufacturing
19.   Pulp and paper industry
20.   Other organic chemical manufacturing
21.   Other inorganic  chemical manufacturing
22.   Semiconductor manufacturing
23.   Rubber manufacturing
24.   Wood preserving
25.   Uranium mining
Pesticides
Lead (acid)
Chlorine compounds, mercury
PAHs
Solvents
Chrome, metals
Pesticides
Wastes from Multiple Sources
Solvents, chrome, zinc
Metals, oils
Metals
Wastes from multiple sources
Explosives, lead
Solvents, some metals (chrome, zinc)
Pesticides
Petroleum, hydrocarbons, BTEX
Silver,  bromide, solvent
Polymers, phthalates
Chlorinated organics, dioxins
Organics, metals (used as catalyst)
:                Inorganics, metals
Degreasing agents (solvents), metals
Rubber, plastics, polymers, organics
Creosote, PCP, arsenic, chrome, PAHs
Uranium, radioactive metals
                                      LO

-------
                                                            Vendor Name

                                                          Technology Type
                       PART 2:  FULL-SCALE EQUIPMENT/CAPABILITIES

    You must complete this part if you checked Response 17a (that is, technology is at full scale).
    You also may complete this part if the technology is at pilot scale.

24. Major Unit Processes.  In 300 words or less, describe the steps and operation of the full-scale
    system, including list of key components.  Also describe any pre- and post-processing required
    by your technology. Provide  more detail than you did in  Question  13.
                                         EXAMPLE
                                    Major Unit Processes
     Preprocessing
     •  Front-end loader and weight scale
     •  Shredder
     •  Radial stacker belt conveyor and surge hopper

       1.   StockpHed soil is transported to a weigh scale by a front-end loader.

       2.   Soil is deposited directly on a power shredding device. Classified soil with a top size
            of less than 2 inches passes through the shredder into the feed conveyor.

       3.   The feed conveyor is an enclosed radial stacker belt conveyor that is 18 inches wide
            and 60 feet long. The conveyor discharges into the surge hopper located above the
            thermal processor. The soil is fed into the LT system at regular intervals to maintain
            the surge hopper seal.

     Processing

     •  Thermal processor
     •  Induced draft (ID) fan for vapors
     •  Horizontal screw conveyor and ash conditioner

       1.   The thermal processor houses four intermeshed  screw conveyors.  The function of
            each screw conveyor is to move soil  forward  through the processor and to
            thoroughly mix the material, providing indirect contact  between the heat transfer
            fluid and the soil. The shafts and flights of the screw conveyors and the processor
            jackets are hollow to allow circulation of a heat  transfer fluid (that is,  hot oil).

       2.   Vapors are driven off the soil and are drawn out of the thermal processor by an ID
            fan.

       3.   Soil is discharged from the thermal processor onto  a horizontal screw conveyor and
            then an ash conditioner.

       4.   The conditioner is a ribbon flight screw conveyor.  Water spray nozzles installed in
            the conditioner housing  cool the  discharge material and minimize fugitive  dust
            emissions.

     Postprocessing

     •  Stacker belt conveyor and dump truck

       1.   The conditioner discharges onto an inclined stacker belt.  The stacker belt conveys
            the wetted processed soil from the conditioner to the dump truck.
                                             11

-------
                                                           Vendor Name
                                                        Technology Type
                 PART 2:  FULL-SCALE EQUIPMENT/CAPABILITIES (continued)
24. Major Unit Processes (continued).
                                          12

-------
                                                                Vendor Name

                                                             Technology Type
                  PART 2:  FULL-SCALE EQUIPMENT/CAPABILITIES (continued)

25.  Full-Scale Facility is (check one only)

     Q   Transportable          LJ    Fixed                 LJ   In situ

     D>  City	 and State 	 of fixed facility


26.  Number of Full-Scale Systems.

     	  Planned/in design       	  Under construction     	  Constructed

     	  Projected completion    	  Projected completion
               dates                            dates
27.  Capacity Range.

     	to		(units)  Q Not applicable


28.  Estimated Price Range.  Provide a "ballpark" estimate per unit of waste treated.  Include waste
     preprocessing and exclude excavation, permitting, and disposal of residues.

     $	to $	per	(units)
29.  Factors Affecting Unit Price. With "1" the highest, rank any of the following items that will
     have a significant effect on the unit price.  If the technology is in situ, excavation, and waste
     handling cannot affect price.

     	   Initial concentration of contaminant         	   Site preparation
     	   Target concentration of contaminant        	   Waste handling/preprocessing
                                                     	   Amount of debris with waste
                Quantity of waste                       	   Characteristics of soil (classification,
     	   Depth of contamination                              permeability)
     	   Depth to ground water                   	   Utility/fuel rates
     	   Characteristics of residual waste           	   Labor rates
                Moisture content of soil
                 Other (specify) .
 30. Full-Scale Cleanups.

     a.  If you are a subcontractor or prime contractor, give the number of full-scale cleanups using
         your technology that your firm has initiated or completed.  Consider only those applications
         of your technology that were applied at petroleum/hazardous waste sites.
      b.  If you are an equipment manufacturer, give the number of full-scale cleanups by other firms
         using your technology of which you are aware.  Consider only those applications of your
         technology that were applied at petroleum/hazardous waste sites.
                                                 13

-------
                                                                      Vendor Name

                                                                   Technology Type
                          PART 3:  PILOT-SCALE EQUIPMENT/CAPABILITIES


     You must complete this part if you checked Response Question  17b.  You also may complete
     this part if the technology is at full scale or bench scale.
31 '    etmen68',  "     T    ^ ^ ^^ *" St6pS 3nd °peration of the P«ot-scale
     treatment system, mcludmg a list of the key components.  Also describe any  pre- and post-
     processing required by your technology.  Provide more detail than  you did in Question 13.
                                                 EXAMPLE


                                            Major Unft Processes


     Pilot-scale testing involves processing the soils or hulk soils through various operations of reduced-size equipment
     that when set m ser.es, would be similar to a fulf-scafe operation.  The equipment consists of:


     1 .  A hopper and screen for feed preparation; removal of tramp material and sizing, if needed.


     2.  A mixing or  attrition tank where  the prepared feed  is introduced to  the liquids.  In the most basic system
        extraction of contaminant takes place at this stage.


     3.  A classification circuit, consisting of a sump, pump, and cyclone for separation of coarse sand  gravet and
        organics from fine ctays and sifts.


     4.  If extraction  of contaminant so requires, coarse material is subjected to a specific gravity (SG) separation
       through use of a vessel, cyclone, or hydrosizer. Contaminated smaller size mateffal (low SG) is separated from
       tne clean, coarse (high SG) material.
                                         * SCree"' aWl°U9h in fuff-sc^e operation, additional dryers (centrffuges)



    6. Low SG organics containing contaminant are dewatered with a screen and colfected for disposal or secondary
       TfG STmstT.
    7. Clays and silts are flocculated in a reaction tank and gravity-concentrated m a thickener or ctarifier.
    *' slcfnda^ processing S'ltS C°"tafnlnB contaminant are ^watered in a  belt press and sent for disposal  or


                                         dewaterins process is callected 3n* in some —
                                                  14

-------
                                                             Vendor Name

                                                          Technology Type
                 PART 3: PILOT-SCALE EQUIPMENT/CAPABILITIES (continued)

31.  Major Unit Processes (continued).	
32.  Pilot-Scale Facility is (Check only one)

       LJ Transportable              LJ  Fixed

     b. City	and State
                  In Situ

                     of fixed facility.
33.  Number of Pilot-Scale Systems

     	  Planned/in design
Under construction
Constructed
34.  How many times have you used this technology at your facility or at other locations to
     conduct pilot-scale studies on actual wastes?  Count only once multiple studies pertaining to
     the same site, regardless of the number of different wastes or tests. Do not count tests on
     surrogate wastes.
35.  Can you conduct pilot-scale treatability studies on some types of waste at your location?

     D  Yes      Q  No            At a contaminated site?   Q  Yes     Q  No
36.  Capacity Range. Prorate capacity of batch processes. This range should be consistent with
     your answer to Question 35 (the waste requirement for the pilot-scale treatability study).
                      to
                       (units)   Q  Not applicable
37.  Quantity of Waste Needed for Pilot-Scale Treatability Study.  Give the estimated range of
     quantity of waste needed to test, at the pilot scale, the feasibility of this technology on a
     specific waste.
               to
                          (units)
                                              15

-------
                                                                   Vendor Name
                                                                Technology Type
                  PART 4:  TREATABILITY STUDY CAPABILITIES (BENCH SCALE)

38.  Can you conduct bench-scale treatabiiity studies on some types of waste at your location?

     Q  Yes      Q  No

39.  Number of Bench-Scale Studies Conducted.  Estimate total number of bench-scale  studies
     conducted  on actual waste from different sources or sites.  Count only once multiple studies
     pertaining to the same site,  regardless of the number of different wastes or tests.  Do not
     count tests on surrogate wastes.
40.  Description of Bench-Scale Testing  Procedures.  In 200 words or less, describe the type of
     test that would be performed to determine feasibility of this technology for treating a specific
     waste.
                                               EXAMPLE

                                Description of Bench-Scale Testing Procedures

     In our feasibility assessment tests, we> usually start with a sample of the soil to be treated and a knowledge of the
     nature and of each contaminant concentration and the effluent goafs to be met.  The following steps then are
     taken:

     a.  The optimal conditions for soil washing are studied, such as pH, time, and chefating agent and concentration.

     b.  Various lifcely adsorbents are studied on a batch basis to determine which are most effective at removing the
         metals of interest from the chelaling agent in the washing water.

     c.  One or more selected media than are studied on columns to determine their ability to retain metals in a
         continuous-flow situation..

     d.  For the surviving adsorbent(s), the ion elution performance then is determined; after this step, one resin will
         have been selected as optimal for the particular task under study.

     e.  The  selected adsorbent then is isufajected to a number of charge and regeneration  cycles to establish its
         ruggedness.
                                                  16

-------
                                                                         v cnuor iodine

                                                                      Technology Type
    PART 5:  REPRESENTATIVE APPLICATIONS, CLIENT REFERENCES, AND PERFORMANCE DATA

  41.  List as many as five representative projects that also can serve as references.  List information
        for only one project per sheet.  For projects that have more than one application,  fill out a
        separate sheet for each application.  Provide only the performance data that is specific to each
        project listed.  Full- and pilot-scale projects are of most importance.  EPA reserves the right to
        add information on projects conducted for the federal government of which EPA is aware.
Site Name or Industry Type if Client
   ntity Is Confidential:  	
Sito Type or Waste Source (Check all that apply)
           Agriculture
           Battery recycling/disposal
           Chloro-alkali
           manufacturing
           Coal gasification
           Dry cleaning
           Electroplating
           Gasoline service
           station/petroleum storage
           facility
           Herbicide
           manufacturing/use
           Industrial landfills
           Inorganic/organic pigments
        Machine shops
        Metal ore mining and smelting
        Municipal Landfill
        Munitions Manufacturing
        Paint/ink formulation
        Pesticide manufacturing/use
        Petroleum refining and reuse
        Photographic products
        Plastics manufacturing
        Pulp and paper industry
        Other organic chemical
        manufacturing
         Other inorganic chemical
         manufacturing
         Semiconductor manufacturing
         Rubber manufacturing
         Wood  preserving
         Uranium mining

         Others (specify)  	
 .ocation

 City 	
State/Province:

Country 	
Project took place at site named

         	     Yes

                         No
At another site (that is, a Test facility)

          	     Yes

                         No
    Regulation/Statute/Organization
        (Check all that apply)	
                 Application or Project Type (Check all that apply)
          RCRA corrective action

          CERCLA

          TSCA

          Safe Drinking Water Act

          UST corrective action

          State (specify) 	

          DOD

          DOE

          Other (Specify)
          Full-scale cleanup
          Field demonstration
          Pilot-scale treatability study
          Bench-scale treatability study
          RCRA Research, Development,
          and Demonstration
          TSCA National Demonstration
          TSCA Research and Development
          EPA SITE Demonstration Program
          EPA SITE Emerging
          Technology Program
          Research
          Other Ispecify)  	
                       Media Treated (Check all that apply)
           Not Applicable
          Soil (in situ)
          Soil (ex situ)
          Sludge
          Solid
          Natural sediment (in situ)
          Natural sediment (ex situ)
          Ground water in situ
          Off-gas from a primary
          treatment technology
          Dense nonaqueous phase
          liquids (DNAPU [in situ]
          Light nonaqueous phase
          liquids (LNAPL) [in situ]
          Other:	
 Volume/Quantity Treated
                                          Equipment Scale (Check one only)
                             (Units)
 Area treated (for in situ projects)

              	  (Units)
 Depth treated (for in situ projects)

 	  	  (Units)
                    Bench


                    Pilot


                    Full
                                                     Project Status
 Contracted

   Month

 In cleanup  Yes

 Completed

   Month
_Year

   No



 Year
                                                         17

-------
                                                                  Technology Type
  PART 5:  REPRESENTATIVE APPLICATIONS, CLIENT REFERENCES, AND PERFORMANCE DATA
                                               (continued)
a. (continued)
Note:  (1)
List one specific contaminant per line. Do not list such entire contaminant groups as VOCs or solvents.
TPH, which can be anailyzed using a specific test method, can be listed as an individual contaminant.
       (2) and (3)  Indicate the appropriate units; for concentrations that were non-detect write N.D.; treated
                  concentration should be lower than untreated concentration unless the technology is dewatering or
                  some other volume reduction method.  If a concentration range cannot be given, provide an average
                  and note it as such.

       (4)         Specify the cleanup standard or goal, if known, for the individual contaminant for this project.  For
                  example, if the  project was part of a Superfund remedial action, the cleanup goal is  specified in the
                  record of decision (ROD) for that site.
Performance Data
(1)
Contaminant or Pollutant
Parameter
(Example) Benzene










(2)
Untreated
Concentration Range
(Min to Max)
50-150










(3)
Units
mg/kg










(2)
Treated
Concentration Range
(Min to Max)
25-50










(3)
Units
mg/kg










(4)
Cleanup Standard
or Goal
50










(3)
Units
mg/kg










Comments on Performance Data



Cost Information
Estimated or actual total and/or unit cost for this
project
$ per (unit)
$ (total)
What items or activities are included in these cost(s) (e.g., mobilization,
demobilization, excavation, waste handling)?


Person outside of company familiar with project (optional)
Name Company
Address

Phone
Is Literature Available on this Project? (You may
wish to include these citations in Part 6)
Yes No


Additional project information site conditions, mode of operation, and other pertinent information

.




                                                     18

-------
                                                     Vendor Name

                                                   Technology Type
PART 5: REPRESENTATIVE APPLICATIONS, CLIENT REFERENCES, AND PERFORMANCE DATA
                                    (continued)
b.
Sit* Namo or Industry Typ« H CSarrt

Sita Typo or Waste Source (Chack all that apply)
	 Agriculture
	 Battery recycling/disposal
Chloro-alkali manufacturing
	 Coal gasification
Dry cleaning
	 Electroplating
	 Gasoline service
station/petroleum storage
facility
	 Herbicide manufacturing/use
	 Industrial landfills
Inorganic/organic pigments

Location
City
State/Province:
Country
Ragulntion/'Statuta/Organization
(Check all that apply)
RCRA corrective action
CERCLA
TSCA
Safe Drinking Water
Act
UST corrective action
State Ispecifvl
DOD
DOE
Other (Specify)

Not Applicable

Volu m of Quantity Treated
(Units)
Araa treated (for in situ projects)
(Units)
Depth treated (for in situ projects)
(Units)
Machine shops Other inorganic chemical
Metal ore mining and smelting
Municipal Landfill
Munitions Manufacturing
Paint/ink formulation
manufacturing
Semiconductor
manufacturing
Rubber manufacturing
Pesticide manufacturing/use Wood preserving
Petroleum refining and reuse Uranium mining
Photographic products
Plastics manufacturing
Pulp and paper industry
Other organic chemical
Others (specify)

manufacturing
Project took place at site named
Yes
No

At another site (that is, a Test facility)
Yes
No

Application or Project Type (Check all that apply)
Full-scale cleanup EPA SITE Emerging
Field demonstration
Pilot-scale treatability study
Technology Program
Research
Bench-scale treatability study Other (soecirvl
RCRA Research, Development,
and Demonstration
TSCA National Demonstration
TSCA Research and Development
EPA SITE Demonstration Program




Media Treated (Check all that apply)
Soil (in situ) Off-gas from a primary
Soil (ex situ)
Sludge
Solid
Natural sediment (in situ)
Natural sediment (ex situ)
Ground water in situ
treatment technology
Dense nonaqueous phase
liquids (DNAPL) (in situ]
Light nonaqueous phase
liquids (LNAPL) [in situ]
Other:

Equipment Scale (Check one only!
Bench
Pilot
Full

Project Status
Contracted
Month Year
In cleanup Yes No
Completed
Month Year

                                        19

-------
                                                                       vendor name

                                                                   Technology Type
  PART 5:  REPRESENTATIVE APPLICATIONS, CLIENT REFERENCES, AND PERFORMANCE DATA
                                                (continued)
b. (continued)
Note:  (1)
List one specific contaminant per line.  Do not list such entire contaminant groups as VOCs or solvents.
TPH, which can be analyzed using a specific test method, can be listed as an individual contaminant.
       (2) and (3)   Indicate the appropriate units; for concentrations that were non-detect write N.D.; treated
                   concentration should be lower than untreated concentration unless the technology is dewatering or
                   some other volume reduction method.  If a concentration range cannot be given, provide an average
                   and note it as such.

       (4)          Specify the cleanup standard or goal, if known, for the individual contaminant for this project. For
                   example, if the project was part of a Superfund remedial action, the cleanup goal is specified in the
                   record of decision (ROD) for that site.
Performance Data
(1)
Contaminant or Pollutant
Parameter
(Example) Benzene










Comments on Performanc
(2)
Untreated
Concentration Range
(Min to Max)
50-150










(3)
Units
mg/kg










(2)
Treated
Concentration Range
(Min to Max)
25 - 50










e Data

(3)
Units
mg/kg










(4)
Cleanup Standard
or Goat
50










(3)
Units
mg/kg












Cost Information
Estimated or actual total and/or unit cost for this
project
$ per (unit)
$ (total)
What items or activities are included in these cost(s) (e.g., mobilization,
demobilization, excavation, waste handling)?


Person outside of company familiar with project (optional)
Name Comoiinv
Address



Is Literature Available on this Project? (You may
wish to include these citations in Part 6)
Yes No


Additional project information site conditions, mode of operation, and other pertinent information

).




                                                      20

-------
                                                                         Technology Type
    PART 5: REPRESENTATIVE APPLICATIONS, CLIENT REFERENCES, AND PERFORMANCE DATA
                                                     (continued)
Site Name or Industry Typ« W Client
 dantity is Confidential;	
Site Type or Waste Source (Check all that apply!
           Agriculture
           Battery recycling/disposal
           Chloro-alkali
           manufacturing
           Coal gasification
           Dry cleaning
           Electroplating
           Gasoline service
           station/petroleum storage
           facility
           Herbicide
           manufacturing/use
           Industrial landfills
           Inorganic/organic pigments
        Machine shops
        Metal ore mining and smelting
        Municipal Landfill
        Munitions Manufacturing
        Paint/ink formulation
        Pesticide manufacturing/use
        Petroleum refining and reuse
        Photographic products
        Plastics manufacturing
        Pulp and paper industry
        Other organic chemical
        manufacturing
         Other inorganic chemical
         manufacturing
         Semiconductor manufacturing
         Rubber manufacturing
         Wood preserving
         Uranium mining

         Others (specify)  	
 Location

 City 	
State/Province:

Country  	
Project took place at site named

          	     Yes

                          No
At another site (that is, a Test facility)

          	     Yes

                          No
    Regulation/Statute/Organization
         (Check oil that apply)
                  Application or Project Type (Check all that apply!
          RCRA corrective action

          CERCLA

           TSCA

          Safe Drinking Water Act

          LIST corrective action

          State (specify) 	

          DOD

          DOE

           Other (Specify)
          Full-scale cleanup
          Field demonstration
          Pilot-scale treatability study
          Bench-scale treatability study
          RCRA Research, Development,
          and Demonstration
          TSCA National Demonstration
          TSCA Research and Development
          EPA SITE Demonstration Program
          EPA SITE Emerging
          Technology Program
          Research
          Other (specify)  	
                        Media Treated (Check all that apply)
           Nat Applicable
           Soil (in situ)
           Soil (ex situ)
           Sludge
           Solid
           Natural sediment (in situ)
           Natural sediment (ex situ)
           Ground water in situ
          Off-gas from a primary
          treatment technology
          Dense nonaqueous phase
          liquids (DNAPL) [in situl
          Light nonaqueous phase
          liquids (LNAPL) [in situ]
          Other:	
 Volume/Quantity Treated
                                           Equipment Scale (Check one only)
                              (Units)
 Area treated (for in situ projects)

 	   	  (Units)
 Depth treated (for in situ projects)

 	   	  (Units)
                    Bench


                    Pilot

                    Full
                                                       Project Status
 Contracted

   Month

 In cleanup  Yes

 Completed

   Month
.Year

   No



 Year
                                                           21

-------
                                                                   Technology Type
  PART 5:  REPRESENTATIVE APPLICATIONS, CLIENT REFERENCES, AND PERFORMANCE DATA
                                                (continued)
c. (continued)
Note:  (1)
List one specific contaminant per line.  Do not list such entire contaminant groups as VOCs or solvents.
TPH, which can be analyzed using a specific test method, can be listed as an individual contaminant.
       (2) and (3)   Indicate the appropriate units; for concentrations that were non-detect write N.D.; treated
                   concentration should b« lower than untreated concentration unless the technology is dewatering or
                   some other volume reduction method. If a concentration range cannot be given, provide an average
                   and note it as such.

       (4)          Specify the cleanup standard or goal, if known, for the individual  contaminant for this project. For
                   example, if the project was part of a Superfund remedial action, the cleanup goal is specified in the
                   record of decision (ROD) for that site.
Performance Data
(11
Contaminant or Pollutant
Parameter
(Example) Benzene










(2]
Untreated
Concentration Range
(Min to Max)
50 - 1 50










(3)
Units
mg/kg










(2)
Treated
Concentration Range
(Min to Max)
25-50










(3)
Units
mg/kg










(4)
Cleanup Standard
or Goal
50










(3)
Units
mg/kg




&





Comments on Performance Data



Cost Information
Estimated or actual total and/or unit cost for this
project
$ per (unit)
$ (total)
What items or activities are included in these cost(s) (e.g., mobilization,
demobilization, excavation, waste handling)?


Person outside of company familiar with project (optional)
Name Company
Address

Phone

Is Literature Available on this Project? (You may
wish to include these citations in Part 6)
Yes No

Additional project information site conditions, mode of operation, and other pertinent information


.




                                                      22

-------
                                                                           Technology Type
      PART 5:  REPRESENTATIVE APPLICATIONS, CLIENT REFERENCES, AND PERFORMANCE DATA
                                                      (continued)
d.
  Sita Name or Industry Typs if Client
  Identity is Confidential:
 Sita Type or Wasta Source (Check all that apply)
          Agriculture
          Battery recycling/disposal
          Chloro-alkali manufacturing
          Coal gasification
          Dry cleaning
          Electroplating
          Gasoline service
          station/petroleum storage
          facility
          Herbicide manufacturing/use
          Industrial landfills
          Inorganic/organic pigments
    _Machine shops
    _Metal ore mining and smelting
    _Municipal Landfill
    _Munitions Manufacturing
    _Paint/ink formulation
    _Pesticide manufacturing/use
    _Petroleum refining and  reuse
    _Photographic products
    _Plastics manufacturing
    _Pulp and paper industry
       Other inorganic chemical
       manufacturing
       Semiconductor manufacturing
       Rubber manufacturing
       Wood preserving
       Uranium mining

       Others (specify) 	
Other organic chemical manufacturing
 Location

 City  	
 State/Province:

 Country 	
Project took place at site named

          	     Yes

          	     No
 At another site (that is, a Test facility)

           	     Yes

           	     No
    Regutation/Statute/Organization
         (Check all that appty)
                  Application or Project Type (Check all that apply)
           RCRA corrective action

           CERCLA

           TSCA

           Safe Drinking Water Act

           UST corrective action

           State (specify) 	

           DOD

           DOE

           Other (Specify)
          Full-scale cleanup
          Field demonstration
          Pilot-scale treatability study
          Bench-scale treatability study
          RCRA Research, Development,
          and Demonstration
          TSCA National Demonstration
          TSCA Research and Development
          EPA SITE Demonstration Program
           EPA SITE Emerging
           Technology Program
           Research
           Other (specify) 	
                       Media Treated (Check all that apply)
          Not Applicable
          Soil (in situ)
          Soil (ex situ)
          Sludge
          Solid
          Natural sediment (in situ)
          Natural sediment (ex situ)
          Ground water in situ
          Off-gas from a primary
          treatment technology
          Dense nonaqueous phase
          liquids (DNAPL) [in situ]
          Light nonaqueous phase
          liquids (LNAPL)  [in situ]
          Other:
Volume/Quantity Treated
                                           Equipment Scale (Check one only)
                             (Units)
Area treated (for in situ projects)

   	   	  (Units)
Depth treated (for in situ projects)

   	   	  (Units)
                   Bench

                   Pilot

                   Full
                                                                                            Project Status
Contracted

  Month

In cleanup  Yes

Completed

  Month
_Year

   No



 Year
                                                         23

-------
                                                                       venaor Name

                                                                    Technology Type
  PART 5:  REPRESENTATIVE APPLICATIONS, CLIENT REFERENCES, AND PERFORMANCE DATA
                                                (continued)
d. (continued)
Note:  (1)
List one specific contaminant per line.  Do not list such entire contaminant groups as VOCs or solvents.
TPH, which can be analyzed using a specific test method, can be listed as an individual contaminant.
       (2) and (3)   Indicate the appropriate units; for concentrations that were non-detect write N.D.; treated
                   concentration should be lower than untreated concentration unless the technology is dewatering or
                   some other volume reduction method,  if a concentration range cannot be given, provide an average
                   and note it as such.

       (4)          Specify the cleanup standard or goal, if known, for the individual contaminant for this project.  For
                   example, if the project was part of a Superfund remedial action, the cleanup goal is specified in the
                   record of decision (ROD) for that site.
Performance Data
(1)
Contaminant or Pollutant
Parameter
(Example) Benzene










Comments on Performanc
(2)
Untreated
Concentration Rancje
(Min to Max)
50-150










(3)
Units
mg/kg










(2)
Treated
Concentration Range
(Min to Max)
25 - 50











(3)
Units
mg/kg











(4)
Cleanup Standard
or Goat
50











(3)
Units
mg/kg










e Data 	

Cost Information
Estimated or actual total and/or unit cost for this
project
$ per (unit)

What items or activities are included in these cost(s) (e.g., mobilization,
demobilization, excavation, waste handling)?


Person outside of company familiar with project (optional) Is Literature Available on this Project? (You may
wish to include these citations in Part 6)
Name Company
Address


Yes No

Additional project information site conditions, mode of operation, and other pertinent information

). -




                                                      24

-------
                                                     Vendor Name

                                                   Technology Type
PART 5: REPRESENTATIVE APPLICATIONS, CLIENT REFERENCES, AND PERFORMANCE DATA
                                    (continued)
Sito Name or Industry Typ* it Client

Site Typo or Waste Source (Check all that apply}
Agriculture Machine shops
Battery recycling/disposal Metal ore mining and smelting
	 Chloro-alkali manufacturing
	 Coal gasification
	 Dry cleaning
Electroplating
Gasoline service
station/petroleum storage
facility
Herbicide manufacturing/use
Municipal Landfill
Munitions Manufacturing
Paint/ink formulation
Pesticide manufacturing/use
Petroleum refining and reuse
Photographic products
Plastics manufacturing
Pulo and paper industry
Industrial landfills
Inorganic/organic pigments

Location
City
StatejProvince:
Country
Regulation/Statute/Organization
(Check all that apply)
	 RCRA corrective action
	 CEFtCLA
	 TSC4
	 Safe Drinking Water Act
UST corrective action
State (specifvl
	 DOD
	 DOE
Other (Specify)

Not Applicable

Volume/Quantity Treated
(Units)
Area treated (for in situ projects)
(Units)
Depth treated (for in situ projects)
(Units)

Other organic chemical manufacturing
Project took place at site named
Yes
No


Other inorganic chemical
manufacturing
Semiconductor manufacturing
Rubber manufacturing
Wood preserving
Uranium mining
Others Isoecifvi



At another site (that is, a Test facility)
Yes
No

Application or Project Typ« (Check all that apply}
Full-scale cleanup
Field demonstration
Pilot-scale treatability study
Bench-scale treatability study
RCRA Research, Development,
and Demonstration
TSCA National Demonstration
TSCA Research and Development
EPA SITE Demonstration Program
EPA SITE Emerging
Technology Program
Research
Other (soecifv!



Media Treated (Chock all that apply)
Soil (in situ)
Soil (ex situ)
Sludqe
Solid
Natural sediment (in situ)
Natural sediment (ex situ)
Ground water in situ

Equipment Scale (Check one only)
Bench
Pilot
Full

Off-gas from a primary
treatment technology
Dense nonaqueous phase
liquids (DNAPL) [in situl
Light nonaqueous phase
liquids (LNAPU [in situ]
Other:

Project Status
Contracted
Month Year
In cleanup Yes No
Completed
Month Year

                                        25

-------
                                                                       * ciJUUf ««aiiic

                                                                    Technology Type
  PART 5:  REPRESENTATIVE APPLICATIONS, CLIENT REFERENCES, AND PERFORMANCE DATA
                                                (continued)
e. (continued)
Note:  (1)
List one specific contaminant per line.  Do not list such entire contaminant groups as VOCs or solvents.
TPH, which can be analyzed using a specific test method, can be listed as an individual contaminant.
       (2) and (3)   Indicate the appropriate units; for concentrations that were non-detect write N.D.; treated
                   concentration should be lower than untreated concentration unless the technology is dewatering or
                   some other volume reduction method.  If a concentration range cannot be given, provide an average
                   and note it as such.

       (4)          Specify the cleanup standard or goal, if known, for the individual contaminant for this project.  For
                   example, if the project was part of a Superfund remedial action, the cleanup goal is  specified in the
                   record of decision (ROD) for that site.
Performance Data
(11
Contaminant or Pollutant
Parameter
(Example) Benzene










Comments on Performanc
(2)
Untreated
Concentration Range
(Min to Max)
50 - 1 50










(3)
Units
mg/kg










(2)
Treated
Concentration Range
(Min to Max)
25 - 50










e Data

(3)
Units
mg/kg










(4)
Cleanup Standard
or Goat
50










(3)
Units
mg/kg












Cost Information
Estimated or actual total and/or unit cost for this
project
$ per (unit)
$ (total)
What items or activities are included in these cost(s) (e.g., mobilization,
demobilization, excavation, waste handling)?


Person outside of company familiar with project (optional)
Name Comoanv
Address

Phone 	 _
Is Literature Available on this Project? (You may
wish to include these citations in Part 6)
Yes No

Additional project information site conditions, mode of operation, and other pertinent information


.




                                                      26

-------
                                                                 vendor Name

                                                              Technology Type
                      PART 6: LITERATURE AND TECHNICAL REFERENCES

42.  List and attach available documentation (for example, journal articles, conference papers,
     patents) that best describes technology and vendor capabilities. References that contain
     performance and cost data are of particular interest.  Do not include personal references.  EPA
     reserves the right to add to the list other publicly available references.
   Author(s)

   Title 	
   Journal/Conference

   Data  	
NTIS/EPA Document Number(s)
   Author(s)

   Title 	
   Journal/Conference

   Date 	
NTIS/EPA Document Number(s)
   Author(s)

   Title
   Journal/Conference

   Date 	
NTIS/EPA Document Number(s)
   Author(s)

   Title
   Journal/Conference

   Date 	
NTIS/EPA Document Number(s)
   Author(s)

   Title
    Journal/Conference

    Date 	
 NTIS/EPA Document Number(s)
                                                 27

-------
TfflS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK

-------
                                      APPENDIX  A
                 BUSINESS CLASSIFICATION INFORMATION

The following information is intended to be used as a reference to answer question 2e.  SIC code
information and definitions are given below.  To determine if your company is a small and/or
disadvantaged business first identify the Standard Industrial Classification (SIC) code for your
company and secondly identify whether or  not your company qualifies as a small business under that
SIC code.  Small and disadvantaged businesses are defined below.

Definition of SIC Code

Standard Industrial Classification (SIC)  Code - refers to the four-digit number assigned by the
government to classify establishments by the type of activity in which they are engaged.  The codes
are published by the Government in the Standard Industrial Classification Manual. The Manual is
intended to cover the entire field of economic activities. It classifies and defines activities by industry
categories and is the source used by the Small Business Administration (SBA) as a guide  in defining
industries for size standards.  The number  of employees or annual receipts indicates the maximum
allowed for a concern, including its affiliates, to be considered small  (Federal Acquisition Circular
(FAC) 90-16, December 21, 1992, Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR), 19.102(g)).

Most remediation firms should fall under one of the SIC codes defined below:

The following SIC code definitions are taken from the  Standard Industrial Classification Manual,
1987, Office of Management and Budget.

SIC code 4953:  Refuse Systems (i.e.,  activities related to  actual site  cleanup) Establishments
primarily engaged in the collection and disposal of refuse by processing or destruction or in the
operation of  incinerators, waste treatment plans, landfills,  or other sites for disposal of such materials.
Establishments primarily engaged  in collecting and transporting refuse without such disposal are
classified in Transportation, Industry 4212.
        Acid waste, collection and disposal of
        Ashes, collection and disposal of
        Dumps, operation of
        Garbage: collecting, destroying, and
         processing
        Hazardous waste material disposal sites
        Incinerator operation
Landfill, sanitary:  operation of
Radioactive waste materials, disposal of
Refuse systems
Rubbish collection and disposal
Sludge disposal sites
Street refuse systems
Waste materials disposal at sea
 SIC code 8711: Engineering Services (i.e., activities related to remedial investigations, feasibility
 studies, and remedial design) Establishments primarily engaged in providing professional engineering
 services.  Establishments primarily providing and supervising their own engineering staff on
 temporary contract to other firms are included in this industry.  Establishments providing engineering
                                              A-l

-------
 personnel, but not general supervision, are classified in Industry 7363. Establishments primarily
 engaged in providing architectural engineering services are classified in Industry 8712, and those
 providing photogrammetric engineering services are classified in Industry 8713.
        Designing: ship, boat, and machine
        Engineering services:  industrial, civil,
         electrical, mechanical, petroleum,
         marine, and design

Definitions of Small and Disadvanta^ed/Minoritv Business
                                                            Machine tool designers
                                                            Marine engineering services
                                                            Petroleum engineering services
The following small business size standards established by the SBA are taken from FAC90-16
December 21, 1992, FAR 19.102.

SIC Code      Description
                                                                                           Size
4943
8711
                Refuse Systems  	   $6.0 million
                Engineering Services
                       Military and Aerospace Equipment
                       and Military Weapons  	$13.5 million
                       Marine Engineering and Naval Architecture	   $9.0 million
                       Other Engineering Services	.' "   $2.5 million

 The following information is taken from FAC 90-16 December 21,  1992, FAR 19.101.

 Small business concern - means a concern, including its affiliates, that is independently owned and
 operated, not dominant in the  field of operation in which it is bidding on government contracts  and
 qualified as a small business under the criteria and size standards in 13 CFR Part 121   Such a
 concern is "not dominant in its field of operation" when it does not exercise a controlling or major
 influence on a national basis in a kind of business activity in which a number of business concerns are
 primarily engaged.  In determining whether dominance exists, consideration shall be given to all
 appropriate factors, including volume of business, number of employees, financial resources
 competitive status or position,  ownersMp or control of materials, processes, patents, license '
 agreements, facilities, sales territory, and nature of business activity.

 Small disadvantaged/minority busings concern - means a small business concern that is at least 51
 percent unconditionally owned by one or more individuals who are both socially and economically
 disadvantage*!, or a publicly owned business that has at least 51  percent of its stock unconditionally
 owned by one or more socially and economically disadvantage individuals and that has its
 management and daily business controlled by one or more such individuals.  This term also means a
 small business concern that is at least 51 percent unconditionally owned by an economically
disadvantaged Indian tribe or Native Hawaiian Organization, or a publicly owned business that has at
least 51 percent of its stock unconditionally owned by one of these entities,  that has  its management
                                            A-2

-------
and daily business controlled by members of an economically disadvantaged Indian tribe or Native
Hawaiian Organization, and that meets the requirements of 13 CFR 124.

       (a)  "Socially disadvantaged individuals" means individuals who have been subjected to racial
or ethnic prejudice or cultural bias because of their identify as a member of a group without regard to
their qualities as individuals.

       (b) "Economically disadvantaged individuals" means socially disadvantaged individuals whose
ability to compete in the free enterprise system is impaired due to diminished opportunities to obtain
capital and credit as compared to others in the same line of business who are not socially
disadvantaged.  Individuals who certify that they are members of named groups (Black Americans,
Hispanic Americans, Native Americans, Asian-Pacific Americans, Subcontinent-Asian Americans) are
to be considered socially and economically disadvantaged.

               (1) "Subcontinent Asian Americans" means United States citizens whose origins are in
       India, Pakistan, Bangladesh, Sri Lanka, Bhutan, or Nepal.

               (2) "Asian Pacific Americans" means United States citizens whose origins are in
       Japan, China, the  Philippines, Vietnam, Korea, Samoa,  Guam, the U.S. Trust Territory of the
       Pacific Islands (Republic of Palau), the Northern Mariana Islands,  Laos, Kampuchea
       (Cambodia), Taiwan, Burma, Thailand, Malaysia,  Indonesia, Singapore, Brunei, Republic of
       the Marshall Islands, or the Federated States of Micronesia.

               (3) "Native Americans" means American Indians, Eskimos, Aleuts, and Native
       Hawaiians.

        (c) "Native Hawaiian Organization"  means any community service organization serving
Native Hawaiians in, and  chartered as a not-for-profit organization by, the State of Hawaii, which is
controlled by Native Hawaiians, and whose  business activities will principally benefit such Native
Hawaiians.

        (d) "Indian tribe"  means any Indian  tribe, band, nation, or other organized group or
community of Indians, including any Alaska Native Corporation as defined in 13 CFR 124.100 which
is recognized as eligible for the special programs and services provided by the U.S. to Indians
because of their status as Indians, or which  is recognized as such by the State in which such tribe,
band, nation, group, or community resides.

Women-owned - as used in this form, means a business that is at least 51 percent owned by  a woman
or women who are U.S. citizens and who also control and operate the business.
                                               A-3

-------
                                   APPENDIX B
                      KEY TO CONTAMINANT GROUPS
  CONTAMINANT GROUP CODES FOR HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES LIST
Qr
|p

|Ł

|F

f
    Halogenated volatiles

    Halogenated semivolatiles

    Nonhalogenated volatiles

    Nonhalogenated semivolatiles

    Organic pesticides/herbicides

    Dioxins/furans

    PCBs

    Polynuclear aromatics (PNAs)

    Solvents

    Benzene-toluene-ethylbenzene-xylene (BTEX)

    Organic cyanide

    Organic corrosives
Inorganic

[jyj|  Heavy metals

|N |  Nonmetallic toxic elements (As, F)

|Q |  Radioactive metals

|p |  Asbestos

|Q |  Inorganic cyanides

|R |  Inorganic corrosives



Miscellaneous

|S |  Explosives/propellants

[T |  Organometallic pesticides/herbicides
                                          B-l

-------
 HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES
Organic Contaminant Group

   CAS No.

     208968   Acenaphthylene	D,H
      83329   Acenaphihene  	D,H
      75070   Acetaldehyde	C
      67641   Acetone	C,I
      75058   Acetonitrile	C,K
      98862   Acetophenone	D
     591082   Acetyl-2-thiourea, 1  	D
     107028   Acrolein	. . .  . C
      79061   Acrylamide	D
      79107   Acrylic acid  	CL
     107131   Acrylonitrile	C
     124049   Adipic acid	L
     116063   Aldicarb	E
     309002   Aldrin	E
     107186   AHyl alcohol	E
      62533   Aniline  	D,I,L
     120127   Anthracene	D,H
    1912249   Atrazine	E
    2642719   Azinphos-ethyl	E
      86500   Azinphos-methyl   	E
     151564   Aziridine	C

      71432   Benzene	C,I,J
      98884   Benzene carbonyl chloride  	B
      92875   Benzidine	D
     205992   Benzofluoranthene,3,4-  	H
      65850   Benzoic acid	D,L
     100470   Benzonitrile 	C,I
      95169   Benzothiazole,l,2-  	D,I
      50328   Benzo (a) pyrene  	D,H
     206440   Benzo (j,k) fluorene   	H
     207089   Benzo (k) fluoranthene	D,H
      100447   Benzyl chloride	A
      56553   Benz  (a) anthracene	D,H
      117817   Bis (2-ethyl hexyl) phthalate 	D
      111911   Bis (2-chloroethoxy) methane	B
      111444   Bis (2-chloroethyl) ether	B
     542881   Bis (chloromethyl) ether ........ B
      75274   Bromodichloromethane	A
      74964   Bromomethane	A
     1689845   Bromoxynil	E
      106990   Butadiene, 1,3-  	C
      71363   Butanol	C
      85687   Butlbenzyl phthalate  	D
      94826   Butyric acid, 4-2(2,4-dichlorop) . . . C,L
CAS No.

  133062
   63252
 1563662
   75150
   56235
   78196
   75876
   57749
  106478
  108907
   67663
   74873
  107302
  106898
   91587
   95578
   59507
 2921882
  218019
   56724
 8021394
  108394
  106445
   98828
21725462
  110827
  108941

   72548
   72559
   50293
   78488
  333415
  132649
   53703
  124481
  106934
   96128
  1918009
   95501
  541731
   106467
   91941
   75718
   75343
Captan	B
Carbaryl   	E
Carbofuran	E,F
Carbon disulfide	C
Carbon tetrachloride  	A
Carbophenothion  	E
Chloral  	A
Chlordane  	E
Chloroaniline, p-  	B
Chlorobenzene	A
Chloroform	A
Chloromethane	A
Chloromethyl methyl ether  	A
Chloromethyloxirane, 2-	E
Chloronaphthalene, 2-	B
Chlorophenol, 2-	B
Chloro-3-methylphenol, 4-  	B
Chloropyrifos  	E
Chrysene	D,H
Coumaphos	E
Creosote  	H
Cresol, m- 	D
Cresol, p-	D
Cumene	C,I
Cyanazine  	E
Cyclohexane	C,I
Cyclohexanone  	C

ODD  	E
DDE	.-	E
DDT	E
DBF	C.E
Diazinon  	E
Dibenzofuran	D
Dibenz (a,h) anthracene	D,H
Dibromachloromethane  	A
Dibromoethane, 1,2-	A
Dibromo-3-chloropropane, 1,2-   ... A
Dicamba  	E
Dichlorobenzene, 1,2-	B
Dichlorobenzene, 1,3-	B
Dichlorobenzene, 1,4-	B
Dichlorobenzidine, 3,3-	B
Dichlorodifiuoromethane  	A
Dichloroethane, 1,1-	A
                                                       B-2

-------
 CAS No.
CAS No.
  107062   Dichloroethane, 1,2-	A
   75354   Dichloroethene, 1,1-	A
  156592   Dichloroethylene, cis-1,2-	A
  156605   Dichloroethylene, trans-1,2-   	A
  120832   Dichlorophenol, 2,4-	B
   94757   Dichlorophenoxyacetic acid, 2- .... L
   78875   Dichloropropane,  1,2-	A
  542756   Dichloropropene,  1,3-	A
   62737   Dichlorvos	E
  115322   Dicofol  	E
   60571   Dieldrin	E
   84662   Diethyl phthalate	  . D
  111466   Diethylene glycol	D,I
 1660942   Diisopropylmethylphosphonate .  . .  . D
   60515   Dimethoate	E
  119904   Dimethoxybenzidine, 3,3-	D
  105679   Dimethyl phenol,  2,4-	D
   13113   Dimethyl phthalate  	D
   77781   Dimethyl sulfate	 C
   99650   Dinitrobenzene, 1,3-	D
   51285   Dinitrophenol, 2,4-	D
  121142   Dinitrotoluene, 2,4-	D
  606202   Dinitrotoluene, 2,6-	D
   88857   Dinoseb	E
  123911   Dioxane, 1,4	.  . C
   78342   Dioxathion	E
  122667   Diphenylhydrazine,  1,2-	D,H
   85007   Diquat	E
  298044   Disulfoton  	C,E
  330541   Diuron  	E
   84742   Di-n-butyl phthalate  	D
  117840   Di-n-octyl phthalate	D

  115297   Endosulfan	E
  959988   Endosulfan	I
33212659   Endosulfan II  	E
 1031078   Endolsulfan sulfate	E
  145733   Endothall	E
   72208   Endrin	E
 7421934   Endrin aldehyde	E
  563122   Ethion	E
  141786   Ethyl acetate	C
  100414   Ethyl benzene	C,J
   75003   Ethyl chloride	A,I
   60297   Ethyl ether	C
  107211   Ethylene glycol  	I
  110805   Ethylene glycol monoethyl
           ether	C,I
  759944   Ethylpropylthio carbomate, S-  .  . .  . E
122145
86737
50000
64186
110009
98011
765344
76448
1024573
118741
87683
60873
60873
60873
77474
67721
70304
110543
1689834
78831
78591
143500
58899
121755
108316
123331
126987
67561
16752775
72435
79221
78933
108101
80626
101144

75092
23855
91203
100016
98953
100027
. Fenitrothion 	
Fluorene 	
Formaldehyde 	
Formic acid 	
Furan 	
Furfural 	
Glycidyaldehyde 	
Heptachlor 	
Heptachlor epoxide 	
Hexachlorobenzene 	
Hexachlorobutadieene 	
Hexachlorocyclohexane, alpha- . .
Hexachlorocyclohexane, beta- . .
Hexachlorocyclohexane, delta- . .
Hexachlorocyclopentadiene ....
Hexachloroethane 	
Hexachlorophene 	
Hexane 	
loxynil 	
Isobutanol 	
Isophorone 	
Kepone 	
Lindane . 	 	
Malathion 	
Maleic anhydride 	
Maleric hydrazide 	
Methacrylonitrile 	
Methanol 	
Methomyl 	
Methoxychlor 	
Methyl chlorocarbonate 	
Methyl ethyl ketone 	
Methyl isobutyl ketone 	
Methyl methacrylate 	
Methylene bis
(2-chloroaniline) 	
Methylene chloride 	
Mirex 	
Naphthalene 	
Nitroaniline, p- 	
Nitrobenzene 	
Nitrophenol, 4- 	
. . E
. . D,H
. . C
. . L
. . F
I.C
G
. . E
. . E
. . B
. . B
. . E
. . E
. . E
. . B
. . B
. . B
. . C,I
. . E
. . C
D
E
E
. . C,E
. . E
. . E
. . C
. . C
. . E
. . E
. . L
. . C
. . C,I
. . C

. . B
. . A
E
. . D,H
. . D
. . D
. . D
                                                      B-3

-------
Organic Contaminant Group (continued)
CAS No.

 1116547   Nitrosodiethanolamine, n-	D
   55185   Nitrosodiethylamine, n-  	D
   62759   Nitrosodimethylamine, n-	D
   86306   Nitrosodiphenylamine, n-	D
  930552   Nitrosopyrrolidine, n-  	D
  924163   Nitroso-di-n-butylamine, n-	D
  615532   Nitroso-di-n-methylurethane, n-  . .  . D
   99990   Nitrotoluene, 4-	D

   56382   Parathion, ethyl-	E
  298000   Parathion, methyl-  	E
 1336363   PCBs  	G
  608935   Pentachlorobenzene	B
   76017   Pentachloroethane	B
   82688   Pentachloronitrobenzene	B
   87865   Pentachlorophenol	B
   85018   Phenanthrene	D,H
  108952   Phenol 	 D
  139662   Phenyl sulfide	D
   62384   Phenylmercurie acetate	E
  298022   Phorate	C,E
   75445   Phosgene	E
13171216   Phosphamidon	E
 7803512   Phosphine	E
   85449   Phthalic anhydride  	D,E
23950585   Pronamide 	D
  129000  Pyrene	D,H
  110861   Pyridine	C,I

   91225   Quinoline	D,H

  108463  Resorcinol  	D
  299843  Ronnel  	E

   57249  Strychnine  	E,H
  100425  Styrene  	C
CAS No.

  746016
   95943
  630206
   79345
  127184
   58902
3689245
  109999
  137268
  108883
  584849
8001352
   93721
   75252
  120821
   71556
   79005
   79016
   75694
  933788
   95954
   88062
  609198
   93765
  933788
27323417
   126727
TCDD	F
Tetrachlorobenzene,  1,2,4,5-	B
Tetrachloroethane, 1,1,1,2- ...... A,E,I
Tetrachloroethane, 1,1,2,2-	A
Tetrachloroethene	A
Tetrachlorophenol, 2,3,4,6 	B
Tetraethyldithiopyrophosphate .  . .  . E
Tetrahydrofuran	F,I
Thiram  	E
Toluene	C,J
Toluene diisocyanate	D
Toxaphene 	 E
TP, 2,4,5- 	E
Tribromomethane	A
Trichlorobenzene, 1,2,4-  	B
Trichloroethane,  1,1,1-  	A
Trichloroethane,  1,1,2-  	A
Trichloroethylene	A
Trichlorofluoromethane  	A
Trichlorophenol, 2,3,5-  	B
Trichlorophenol, 2,4,5-  	B
Trichlorophenol, 2,4,6-  	B
Trichlorophenol, 3,4,5-  	B
Trichlorophenoxyacetic acid,  2-  . . . L
Trichloro-l,2,2-trifluoroethane .... A,I
Triethanolamine	E
Tris (2,3-dibromopropyl) phosphate . B
  108054  Vinyl acetate	C
   75014  Vinyl chloride	A

   81812  Warfarin  	E

  108383  Xylene, m-	C,J
   95476  Xylene, o-  	C,J
  106423  Xylene, p-  	C,J
                                                      B-4

-------
Inorganic Contaminant Group
CAS No.
7429905
20859738
7440360
7440382
1327533
1303339
7440393
542621
7440417
7440439
13765190
7778543
1333820
7440473
7440484
7440508
544923
7720787
7439896
7439921
7439965
7439976
7440020
7718549
10102440
7789006
151508
506616
7783008
7782492
7440224
506649
7440235
26628228
7681494
7775113
Aluminum 	
Aluminum phosphide 	
Antimony 	
Arsenic 	
Arsenic trioxide 	
Arsenic trisulfide 	
Barium
Barium cyanide 	
Beryllium
Cadmium . . .
Calcium chromate
Calcium hypochlorite 	
Chromic acid 	
Chromium 	
Chromium (III)
Chromium (VI) 	
Cobalt . ....
Cooper 	
Copper cyanide 	
Ferrous sulfate 	
Iron 	
Lead 	
Manganese 	
Mercury 	
Nickel 	
Nickel chloride 	
Nitrogen dioxide 	
Potassium chromate 	
Potassium cyanide 	
Potassium silver cyanide ....
Selenious acid 	
Selenium 	
Silver 	
Silver cyanide 	
Sodium 	
Sodium azide 	
Sodium fluoride 	
Sodium chromate 	

. . . . M
. . . . M
. . . . M
. . . . M
. . . . M
. . . . M
M
.... M,Q
. . . M
. . . . M
M
. . . . M
. . . . M,R
. . . . M
M
. , . . M
. . . . M
. . . . M
.... M,Q
. . . . M
. . . M
. . . . M
. . . . M
M
. . . . M
. . . . M
. . . . R
. . . . M
. ; . . M,Q
	 M,Q
....MR
. . . . M
. . . . M
.... M,Q
. . . . M
. . . . M
. , . M
. . . . M

CAS No.
143339
1310732
7440280
1314325
563688
6533739
7791120
10102451
12039520
7446186
7440291
1314621
7440666
557211
1314847
7733020
Explosive)
CAS No.
7664417
131748
7773060
460195
2691410
302012
55630
99990
26628228
99354
118967
Organom<
CAS No.
630104
78002
Sodium cyanide
Sodium hydroxide 	
Thallium 	
Thallic oxide 	
Thallium acetate 	
Thallium carbonate ...
Thallium chloride 	
Thallium nitrate 	
Thallium selenide
Thallium (I) sulfate 	
Thorium . . 	
Vanadium pentoxide 	
Zinc .
Zinc cyanide 	
Zinc phosphide 	
Zinc sulfate 	
Tropellants
Ammonia 	
Ammonium picrate 	
Ammonium sulfamate 	
Cyanogen
Cyclotetramethylenetetranitramine .
Hydrazine 	 	
Nitroglycerine
Nitrotoluene, 4- 	
Sodium azide 	
Trinitrobenzene 135
Trinitrotoluene
itallic Compound
Selenourea ....
Tetraethyl lead . . .

M Q
. M R
. M
M
M
M
. M
M
M
. M
M
. M
M
. M,Q
M
. M
. S
s
s
s
. s
s
s
. s
. M S
s
s
u
u

                                                B-5

-------
THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK

-------
                                                Appendix C
                             List of VISITT 4.0 Vendors by Technology
ACID EXTRACTION
   ADVANCED RECOVERY SYSTEMS, INC.
   CENTER FOR HAZARDOUS MATERIALS RESEARCH
   COGNIS, INC.
   COGNIS, INC.
   EARTH TREATMENT TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
   IT CORPORATION
   LOCKHEED CORPORATION
ADSORPTION/ABSORPTION - IN SITU
   DYNAPHORE, INC.
   ENVIRONMENTAL FUEL SYSTEMS, INC.
AIR SPARGING
   BILLINGS & ASSOCIATES, INC.
   ENVIROGEN, INC.
   HAYWARD BAKER ENVIRONMENTAL, INC.
   HORIZONTAL TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
   IEG TECHNOLOGIES CORP.
   IT CORPORATION
   QUATERNARY INVESTIGATIONS, INC.
   TERRA VAC, INC.
BIOREMEDIATION - IN SITU GROUNDWATER
   ABB ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC.
   BIO-GENESIS TECHNOLOGIES
   ECOLOGY TECHNOLOGIES INTERNATIONAL, INC.
   ECOTECHNIEK B.V.
   ELECTROKINETICS, INC.
   ENSR CONSULTING AND ENGINEERING
   EODT SERVICES, INC.
   ESE ENVIRONMENTAL, INC.
   GAIA RESOURCE, INC.
   GEO-MICROBIAL TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
   GROUNDWATER TECHNOLOGY, INC.
   IT CORPORATION
   KEMRON ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC.
   MICRO-BAG INTERNATIONAL, INC.
   MICROBIAL ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES (MES)
   OHM REMEDIATION SERVICES CORPORATION
   REMEDIATION TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
   SBP TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
   WASTE STREAM TECHNOLOGY, INC.
   YELLOWSTONE ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE, INC.
BIOREMEDIATION - IN SITU LAGOON
   BIO-GENESIS TECHNOLOGIES
   ECOLOGY TECHNOLOGIES INTERNATIONAL, INC.
   LIMNOFK INC./GOLDER ASSOCIATES
   OHM REMEDIATION SERVICES CORPORATION
   PRAXAIR, INC.
BIOREMEDIATION - IN SITU SOIL
   ABB ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC.
   BILLINGS & ASSOCIATES, INC.
   BIO-GENESIS TECHNOLOGIES
   BIOGEE INTERNATIONAL, INC.
   DETOX INDUSTRIES, INC.
   ECOLOGY.TECHNOLOGIES INTERNATIONAL, INC.
   ELECTROKINETICS, INC.
   ESE ENVIRONMENTAL, INC.
   GEO-MICROBIAL TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
   GRACE DEARBORN, INC.
   GROUND WATER TECHNOLOGY, INC.
   HAYWARD BAKER ENVIRONMENTAL, INC.
   IN-SITU FIXATION, INC.
   KEMRON ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC.
   MICRO-BAG INTERNATIONAL, INC.
   MICROBIAL ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES (MES)
   QUATERNARY INVESTIGATIONS, INC.
   SBP TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
   WASTE STREAM TECHNOLOGY, INC.
BIOREMEDIATION - NOT OTHERWISE SPECIFIED
   AP TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
   B&S RESEARCH, INC.
   BEAREHAVEN RECLAMATION, INC.
   BIO-PRO CORP.
   BIOREMEDIATION SERVICE, INC.
   BIOREMEDIATION TECHNOLOGY SERVICES, INC.
   CHEMPETE, INC.
   CLYDE ENGINEERING SERVICE
   DETOX INDUSTRIES, INC.
   ECO-TEC, INC./ECOLOGY TECHNOLOGY
   ENSITE, INC.
   EPG BIOSERVICES INC.
   ETUS, INC.
   MICHIGAN BIOTECHNOLOGY INSTITUTE
   PERINO TECHNICAL SERVICES, INC.
   SYBRON CHEMICALS, INC.
BIOREMEDIATION - SLURRY PHASE
   BIO SOLUTIONS, INC.
   BIO-GENESIS TECHNOLOGIES
   BIOGEE INTERNATIONAL, INC.
   BOGART ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC.
   ECOLOGY TECHNOLOGIES INTERNATIONAL, INC.
   EIMCO PROCESS EQUIPMENT CO.
   EODT SERVICES, INC.
   GENESIS ECO SYSTEMS, INC.
   GEO-MICROBIAL TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
   IT CORPORATION
   J.R. SIMPLOT COMPANY
   OHM REMEDIATION SERVICES CORPORATION
   PRAXAIR, INC.
   REMEDIATION TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
   SBP TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
   WASTE STREAM TECHNOLOGY, INC.
   YELLOWSTONE ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE, INC.
   YELLOWSTONE ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE, INC.
BIOREMEDIATION - SOLD3 PHASE
   ABB ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC.
   ABB ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC.
   ABB ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC.
   ALVAREZ BROTHERS, INC.
   ARCTECH,INC.
   BIO-GENESIS TECHNOLOGIES
   BIOGEE INTERNATIONAL, INC.
   BIOREMEDIATION SERVICE, INC.
   BIOREMEDIATION SERVICE, INC.
   CLEAN-UP TECHNOLOGY, INC.
                                                    C-l

-------
  EARTH TECH
  EARTHFAX ENGINEERING, INC.
  ECOLOGY TECHNOLOGIES INTERNATIONAL, INC.
  ENSR CONSULTING AND ENGINEERING
  ETUS, INC.
  GEO-MICROBIAL TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
  GRACE DEARBORN, INC.
  GROUNDWATER TECHNOLOGY, INC.
  IT CORPORATION
  MICROBIAL ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES (MES)
  MYCOTECH CORPORATION
  OHM REMEDIATION SERVICES CORPORATION
  PERINO TECHNICAL SERVICES, INC.
  REMEDIATION TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
  SBP TECHNOLOGIES. INC.
  WASTE STREAM TECHNOLOGY, INC.
BIOVENTING
  ABB ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC.
  BATTELLE PACIFIC NORTHWEST LABORATORIES
  DAMES & MOORE
  ENGINEERING-SCIENCE, INC.
  ENSR CONSULTING AND ENGINEERING
  ENVIROGEN.INC.
  ENVIRONEERING
  H2O SCIENCE, INC.
  HAYWARD BAKER ENVIRONMENTAL, INC.
  rr CORPORATION
  M1TTELHAUSER CORPORATION
  OHM REMEDIATION SERVICES CORPORATION
  QUATERNARY INVESTIGATIONS, INC.
  TERRA VAC, INC.
CHEMICAL TREATMENT - DECHLORINATION
   COMMODORE ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC.
   SDTX TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
CHEMICAL TREATMENT - IN SITU GROUNDWATER
   ENV1ROMETAL TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
   GEOCHEM DIVISION OF TERRA VAC
   INTERA. INC.
CHEMICAL TREATMENT - OTHER
   CLEANTECH OF ARKANSAS, INC.
   CORPEX TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
   DAVY INTERNATIONAL - ENVIRONMENTAL DIV.
   INTEGRATED CHEMISTRIES, INC.
   RMT.INC.
   SOLUCORP INDUSTRIES LTD.
   VIKING INDUSTRIES
 CHEMICAL TREATMENT - OXIDATION/REDUCTION
   ADVANCED RECOVERY SYSTEMS, INC.
   ARCTECH. INC.
   ARCTECH, INC.
   DELPHI RESEARCH, INC.
   ELI ECO LOGIC INTERNATIONAL, INC.
   EM&C ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES
   ETUS, INC.
   G.E.M., INC.
   HIGH VOLTAGE ENVIRONMENTAL APPLICATIONS
   IT CORPORATION
   FT CORPORATION
   MOLTEN METAL TECHNOLOGY, INC.
   SYNTHETICA TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
   TERRA VAC, INC.
   THERMOCHEM, INC.
DELIVERY/EXTRACTION SYSTEMS
   DRILEX SYSTEMS, INC.
   EASTMAN CHERRINGTON ENVIRONMENTAL
   HORIZONTAL TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
   NOVATERRA, INC.
DUAL PHASE EXTRACTION
   BILLINGS & ASSOCIATES, INC.
   DAMES & MOORE
   EG & G ENVIRONMENTAL, INC.
   FIRST ENVIRONMENT, INC.
   IT CORPORATION
   TERRA VAC, INC.
ELECTRICAL SEPARATION
   ELECTRO-PETROLEUM, INC.
   ELECTROKINETICS, INC.
   WATER AND SLURRY PURIFICATION PROCESS
ELECTRO-THERMAL GASIFICATION - IN SITU
   BIO-ELECTRICS, INC.
MAGNETIC SEPARATION
   S.G. FRANTZ CO., INC.
MATERIALS HANDLING/PHYSICAL SEPARATION
   CANONIE ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES CORP.
   MICROFLUIDICS CORP.
   ONSITE * OFSITE INC./BATTELLE PNL
   PORTEC, INC.
   RECRA ENVIRONMENTAL, INC.
OFF-GAS TREATMENT
   BECO ENGINEERING CO.
   BOHN BIOFILTER CORP.
   ECOLOGY TECHNOLOGIES INTERNATIONAL, INC.
   ENVIROGEN, INC.
   GENERAL ATOMICS
   IT CORPORATION
   KSE, INC.
   MEMBRANE TECHNOLOGY & RESEARCH, INC.
   MICHIGAN BIOTECHNOLOGY INSTITUTE
   NUCON INTERNATIONAL, INC.
   PROCESS TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
   PRODUCT CONTROL
   PURUS, INC.
   THERMATRIX, INC.
   ZAPIT TECHNOLOGY, INC.
 PNEUMATIC FRACTURING
   ACCUTECH REMEDIAL SYSTEMS, INC.
   TERRA VAC, INC.
 PYROLYSIS
   BIO-ELECTRICS, INC.
   ENERGY RECLAMATION, INC.
   PLASMA ENERGY APPLIED TECHNOLOGY (PEAT)
   PRODUCT CONTROL
   VANCE IDS, INC.
 SLAGGING
   HORSEHEAD RESOURCE DEVELOPMENT CO., INC.
   TEXACO, INC.
 SOIL FLUSHING - IN SITU
    HORIZONTAL TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
 SOH, VAPOR EXTRACTION
    DAMES & MOORE
    DOW ENVIRONMENTAL, INC.
                                                    C-2

-------
   ENVIROGEN, INC.
   GEO-CON, INC.
   IT CORPORATION
   KAP & SEP A, LTD.
   QUATERNARY INVESTIGATIONS, INC.
   TERRA VAC, INC.
SOIL WASHING
   ADVANCED RECOVERY SYSTEMS, INC.
   AEA TECHNOLOGY
   ALTERNATIVE REMEDIAL TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
   B&W NUCLEAR ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC.
   BENCHEM
   BERGMANN USA
   BIOTROL, INC.
   CANONIE ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES CORP.
   DIVESCO, INC.
   EARTH DECONTAMINATORS, INC. (EDI)
   ENSR CONSULTING AND ENGINEERING
   GENESIS ECO SYSTEMS, INC.
   GEOCHEM DIVISION OF TERRA VAC
   GEOCYCLE ENVIRONNEMENT, INC.
   HYDRIPLEX, INC.
   KINIT ENTERPRISES
   LOCKHEED CORPORATION
   OHM REMEDIATION SERVICES CORPORATION
   ON-SITE TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
   SANFORD COHEN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.
   SOIL TECHNOLOGY, INC.
   TECHNOLOGY SCIENTIFIC, LTD.
   TUBOSCOPE VETCO ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES
   WESTINGHOUSE REMEDIATION SERVICES, INC.
SOLVENT EXTRACTION
   A/S PHOENIX CONTRACTORS/PHOENIX MILJOE
   ART INTERNATIONAL, INC.
   CF SYSTEMS CORPORATION
   DEHYDRO-TECH CORPORATION
   EM&C ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES
   ENSR CONSULTING AND ENGINEERING
   ENVIROGEN, INC.
   GEO-MICROBIAL TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
   INTEGRATED CHEMISTRIES, INC.
   NATIONAL RESEARCH COUNCIL OF CANADA
   RESOURCES CONSERVATION CO.
   SRE, INC.
   TERRA-KLEEN RESPONSE GROUP, INC.
SURFACTANT ENHANCED RECOVERY - IN SITU
   ECOSITE, INC.
   S.S. PAPADOPULOS & ASSOCIATES, INC.
   SURTEK, INC.
THERMAL DESORPTTON
   ADVANCED ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC.
   ADVANCED SOIL TECHNOLOGIES
   ARIEL INDUSTRIES, INC.
   BIRD ENVIRONMENTAL GULF COAST, INC.
   CANONIE ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES CORP.
   CARLO ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
   CARSON ENVIRONMENTAL
   CASWAN ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES LTD.
   CLEAN-UP TECHNOLOGY, INC.
   CONTAMINATION TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
   CONTECK ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC.
   COVENANT ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
   DBA, INC.
   ECOTECHNIEK B.V.
   ENVIRO-KLEAN SOILS, INC.
   ENVIRO-SOIL REMEDIATION, INC.
   HAZEN RESEARCH, INC.
   HRUBETZ ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC.
   IT CORPORATION
   IT CORPORATION
   KALKASKA CONSTRUCTION SERVICE, INC.
   MAXYMILLIAN TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
   MERCURY RECOVERY SERVICES, INC.
   MIDWEST SOIL REMEDIATION, INC.
   O'BRIEN & GERE TECHNICAL SERVICES, INC.
   PET-CON SOIL REMEDIATION, INC.
   PHILIP ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES CORP.
   PRODUCTCONTROL
   RECYCLING SCIENCE INTERNATIONAL, INC.
   REMEDIATION TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
   REMTECH, INC.
   ROY F. WESTON, INC.
   RUST INTERNATIONAL, INC.
   SEAVIEW THERMAL SYSTEMS
   SEPARATION AND RECOVERY SYSTEMS, INC.
   SOIL REMEDIATION OF PHILADELPHIA, INC.
   SOILTECH ATP SYSTEMS, INC.
   SOUTHWEST SOIL REMEDIATION, INC.
   SPI/ASTEC
   TEXAROME, INC.
   THERMOTECH SYSTEMS CORPORATION
   TPS TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
   WESTERN RESEARCH INSTITUTE
   WESTINGHOUSE REMEDIATION SERVICES, INC.
THERMALLY ENHANCED RECOVERY - IN SITU
   BATTELLE PACIFIC NORTHWEST LABORATORIES
   BIO-ELECTRICS, INC.
   EM&C ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES
   EM&C ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES
   HRUBETZ ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC.
   IIT RESEARCH INSTITUTE
   KAI TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
   NOVATERRA, INC.
   PRAXIS ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
   R.E. WRIGHT ENVIRONMENTAL, INC. (REWEI)
   SIVE SERVICES
   THERMATRK, INC.
VITRIFICATION
   B&W NUCLEAR ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC.
   BATTELLE PACIFIC NORTHWEST LABORATORIES
   BIO-ELECTRICS, INC.
   ECOTECHNIEK B.V.
   EET CORPORATION
   ELECTRO-PYROLYSIS, INC.
   EM&C ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES
   GEOSAFE CORPORATION
   MULTIPLEX XTALTITE-TEXILLA ENVIRONMENTAL
   RETECH, DIV. OF LOCKHEED ENV. SYS.&TECH.
   SELLER POLLUTION CONTROL SYSTEMS, INC.
   STIR-MELTER, INC.(SUBSID/GLASSTECH,INC.)
   VORTEC CORPORATION
   WASTE DESTRUCTION TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
                                                     C-3

-------

-------