vvEPA United States Environmental Protection Agency Solid Waste and Emergency Response (5102W) EPA 542-R-96-002 March 1996 Vendor Information Form (VIF) 5.0 To be completed for participation in the Vendor Information System for Innovative Treatment Technologies (VISITT) Version 5.0 Note: Instead of submitting this form, you may provide information on your technology(ies) electronically. You can obtain the electronic VIF by electronic mail or download it from EPA's CLU-IN bulletin board system. You also can call the VISITT help line to request a 3.5" IBM-compatible diskette. See Section V, page ii for details. Completion of this form is voluntary. If you have any questions, call the VISITT Help Line at 800/2454505 or 703/287-8927. Primed on Recycled Paper ------- THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK ------- TABLE OF CONTENTS Section GENERAL INFORMATION I. What is VISITT? II. What Innovative Technologies are Eligible for Inclusion? III. Should Confidential Business Information (CBI) be Submitted? ...... IV. Submittal of Process Flow Diagram or Schematic ................... ii V. Electronic Submittal of Vendor Information Form ....................................... u VI. When and Where to File ................................... ii VII. EPA's Authority for Submittal and Burden Statement ................ in VIII. Vendor Information Form ................................... 1 Part 1: General Information and Technology Overview ................ 1 Part 2: Full-Scale Equipment/Capabilities ........................ U Part 3: Pilot-Scale Equipment/Capabilities ....................... 14 Part 4: Treatability Study Capabilities (Bench Scale) ................. 16 Part 5: Representative Applications, Client References, and Performance Data ............................... 17 Part 6: Literature and Technical References ...................... 27 Appendices A BUSINESS CLASSIFICATION INFORMATION ......................... A-l B KEY TO CONTAMINANT GROUPS ................................ B-l C LIST OF VISITT 4.0 VENDORS BY TECHNOLOGY ..................... C-l ------- GENERAL INFORMATION I. What is VISTIT? Vendor Information System for Innovative Treatment Technologies (VISITT) is a service offered by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) Technology Innovation Office (TIO) to promote the use of certain categories of innovative technologies for the treatment of contaminated ground water and soil. Version 4.0, which was released in August 1995, contains 325 technologies provided by 204 vendors. The goal of the database is to foster communication between technology vendors and users by providing information on the availability, performance, and cost associated with the application of treatment technologies. VISITT is intended to inform federal, state, and private-sector remediation professionals of their cleanup options and the capabilities of firms to provide innovative remediation services. II. What Innovative Technologies are Eligible for Inclusion? Eligible technologies are those that are: A. Innovative, that is, technologies that lack cost and performance data and are not commonly applied when their use can provide better, more cost-effective performance than conventional methods B. Designed to treat contaminated soil, sludge, sediments, solid-matrix and to treat groundwater or non-aqueous phase liquids (NAPL) in situ. Technologies that treat groundwater ex situ, incineration, and solidification/stabilization are not eligible. PARTIAL LIST OF INNOVATIVE TREATMENT TECHNOLOGIES OF INTEREST Acid Extraction Adsorption - In Situ Air Sparging - In Situ Ground Water Bioremediation - In Situ Ground Water Bioremediation - In Situ Lagoon Bioremediation - In Situ Soil Bioremediation - Not Otherwise Specified Bioremediation - Slurry Phase Bioremediation - Solid Phase Bioventing Chemical Treatment - Dechlorination Chemical Treatment - In Situ Ground Water Chemical Treatment - Other Chemical Treatment - Oxidation/Reduction Delivery/Extraction Systems Dual-Phase Extraction Electrical Separation Electro - Thermal Gasification - In Situ Magnetic Separation Materials Handling/Physical Separation Off-Gas Treatment Pneumatic Fracturing Pyrolysis Slagging - Off-Gas Treated Soil Flushing - In Situ Soil Vapor Extraction Soil Washing Solvent Extraction Surfactant Enhanced Recovery - In Situ Thermal Desorption Thermally Enhanced Recovery - In Situ Vitrification ------- Suppliers of separate components of a treatment technology (such as bacteria for bioremediation) will not be listed in the database. EPA will determine whether a technology is eligible for inclusion, if so requested by the vendor. Questions about eligibility of technologies can be directed to the VISIT! help line at 800-245-4505 or 703-287-8927. Some of the eligible technologies, as included in VISITT 4.0, are listed on the previous page. III. Should Confidential Business Information be Submitted? Submittal of technology information for participation in VISITT is voluntary, and submittals should not include confidential business information. EPA considers information in the database public information, and if so requested, will release all such information. However, if a vendor wishes to provide general information on confidential projects to highlight business experience, the vendor may elect to use generic descriptions (for example, "organic chemical manufacturer"). IV. Submittal of Process Flow Diagram or Schematic Please provide a flow chart or schematic of the treatment process, showing the equipment necessary for each step. To ensure that schematics are legible in the final system, EPA recommends that schematics be submitted in a Bitmap (BMP), Tag Image File (TIP) or PCX electronic format. If an electronic copy is not available, a camera-ready hard copy suitable for computer scanning can be submitted. V. Electronic Submittal of Vendor Information Form Instead of submitting this form, you may provide information on your technology(ies) electronically. To do so, you can download an electronic version of the VISITT Vendor Information Form (VIF) from EPA's Cleanup Information (CLU-IN) Bulletin Board System (BBS) at (301) 589-8366, or you can obtain the VIF by electronic mail (send requests to cassidt@prcemi.com). You also can obtain the electronic version on a 3.5" IBM-compatible diskette by calling the VISITT help line at 800-245-4505 (DOS 3.3 or higher is needed to operate the software). For electronic submittals, a diskette containing the completed VIF, along with a hard copy printout of the completed form, should be mailed to the address below. VI. When and Where to File Submittal deadline is June 30, 1996 for inclusion in VISITT 5.0, which is scheduled for release in November 1996. Submittals received after the deadline will be reviewed as time and resources permit. Send completed VIFs or diskettes to: System Operator, VISITT PRC Environmental Management, Inc. 1593 Spring Hill Road, Suite 300 Vienna, VA 22182 Electronic submittals should be compressed and e-mailed to cassidt@prcemi.com. ------- VII. EPA's Authority for Submitted and Burden Statement EPA's authority for conducting this fifth Invitation for Submittal is set forth under section 311 of the Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization Act of 1986 (42 U.S.C. 9601 et seq.). Under section 311, EPA may collect and disseminate information related to the use of innovative treatment technologies for remediation of hazardous waste sites. EPA estimates that the vendor reporting burden for this collection of information will average 25 hours per respondent for one original submittal, and 13 hours per respondent for an updated submittal These estimates include the time applicants will require to review and maintain the data needed and to complete and review the VIF. Send comments regarding this estimate of burden or any other aspect of reducing the burden, to Chief, Information Policy Branch, PM- 2^3 US EPA, 401 M Street, SW, Washington, DC 20460; and to Paperwork Reduction Project (OMB#2050-6ll4), Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Office of Management and Budget, Washington, DC 20503. in ------- THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK ------- VENDOR INFORMATION FORM PART 1: GENERAL INFORMATION AND TECHNOLOGY OVERVIEW 1. Date Submitted / / 2a. Developer/Vendor Name . 2b. Is this an update of a technology listed in VISITT Version 4.0 ? Yes Q No LJ If yes, specify technology and vendor name that appeared in VISITT 4.0 if different from the information in this update. For VISITT Version 4.0 Vendors: Questions 2c and 2d are intended to gather information on the use of VISITT in the remediation community. 2c. Please provide a ro.ugh estimate of the total number or frequency of inquiries your company has received through your inclusion in VISITT. _ 2d. Has your company performed work (either for a fee or free), such as a treatability study, pilot-scale study, or field demonstration, as a result of those inquiries. LJ Yes LJ No Please provide details, if possible. 2e. Please list your primary Standard Industrial Classification (SIC) code and check the appropriate business classification for each code. Refer to Appendix A-1 for business classification definitions. SIC code. SIC code Q Small Q Other Than Small Q Disadvantaged/Minority Q Women-owned Q Small Q Other Than Small Q Disadvantaged/Minority Q Women-owned 3. Street Address 4. City 5. Country 6. a. Contact Name(s) _ b. Contact Title(s) 7. Contact Phone ( )_ 9. E-mail Address State/Province Zip Code ext. 8. Fax Number ( )_ 10. Home Page Address ------- Vendor Name Technology Type PART 1: GENERAL INFORMATION AND TECHNOLOGY OVERVIEW (continued) 11. Technology Type. Check one only. Fill out a separate form for each additional technology. a a a a a a a a a a Acid Extraction Adsorption - In Situ Air Sparging - In Situ Ground Water Bioremediation - in Situ Ground Water Bioremediation - In Situ Lagoon Bioremediation - In Situ Soil Bioremediation - Not Otherwise Specified Bioremediation - Slurry Phase Bioremediation - Solid Phase Bioventinq Q a a a a a a a a a Chemical Treatment - Dechlorination Chemical Treatment - In Situ Ground Water Chemical Treatment - Other Chemical Treatment - Oxidation/Reduction Delivery/Extraction Systems Dual-Phase Extraction Electrical Separation Electro-Thermal Gasification - In Situ Magnetic Separation Materials Handling/Physical Separation a a a a a a a a a a a a a Off-Gas Treatment Pneumatic Fracturing Pyrolysis Slagging - Off-Gas Treated Soil Flushing - In Situ Soil Vapor Extraction Soil Washing Solvent Extraction Surfactant Enhanced Recovery - In Situ Thermal Desorption Thermally Enhanced Recovery - In Situ Vitrification - General Other (specify) 12a. Technology Name Assigned By Vendor (if different than name listed in Question 11). 12b. Registered trademark? Q Yes Q No 12c. Does the vendor hold an exclusive license? Q Yes Q No 13. Patents a. Is technology patented? Q Yes Q No b. Is patent pending? Q Yes Q NO 14. Superfund Innovative Technology Evaluation (SITE) Program. a. Is this technology being tested, or has this technology been tested, in EPA SITE Emerging Technology Program? Q Yes Q No b. Is this technology being tested, or has this technology been tested, in EPA SITE Demonstration Program? Q Yes Q No ------- Vendor Name Technology Type PART 1: GENERAL INFORMATION AND TECHNOLOGY OVERVIEW (continued) 15. Description of Technology. In 300 words or less, describe the treatment process, including scientific principles on which the technology is based; key treatment steps; unique and innovative features; whether full-scale system is/will be batch, continuous, or semicontinuous; and whether the technology is above ground or in situ. Parts 2 and 3 allow more detail for full- and pilot-scale systems. Provide a flow chart or schematic of the treatment process, showing the equipment necessary for each step. To ensure the schematics are legible in the final system, EPA recommends that schematics be submitted in a Bitmap (BMP), Tag Image File (TIF) or PCX electronic format. If an electronic copy is not available, a camera-ready hard copy suitable for computer scanning can be submitted as an alternative. EXAMPLE Description of Technology ABC Corporation has developed an innovative solvent extraction technology (SUPER) that uses Super Chemical as the solvent. Super Chemical is a biodegradable solvent. The key to success of this process is Super Chemical's property of inverse miscibility; below 65 degrees F, Super Chemical is soluble in water (hydrophilic) and above 65 degrees F, it is insoluble in water (hydrophobia). Therefore, cold Super Chemical can extract water and water-soluble compounds, and warm Super Chemical can extract organic contaminants, such as PCBs, pesticides, PAHs, SVOCs, and VOCs. Within the unit, the soil is washed continuously with Super Chemical in a counter-current process. The contaminants dissolve in the solution and are removed from the soil by the counter-current flow. The contaminated solvents are reclaimed in a closed-loop circuit, eliminating the need for large volumes of solvent. The clean, washed soil is moved to a closed-loop dryer system, where any excess solvent is removed from the soft. When the soil exits the system, it is relatively free of organics and dry. The collected contaminant from the solvent washing is concentrated 1,000 to 10,000 times, reducing its volume and its associated disposal costs, and is pumped periodically from the system into labeled 55-gallon drums for conventional off-site disposal. Emissions of organic vapors to air are controlled and treated by a carbon absorption system. ------- Vendor Name Technology Type PART 1: GENERAL INFORMATION AND TECHNOLOGY OVERVIEW (continued) 15. Description of Technology (continued). ------- Vendor Name Technology Type PART 1: GENERAL INFORMATION AND TECHNOLOGY OVERVIEW (continued) 16. Technology Highlights. In 200 words or less, describe the technology in terms of contaminants treated, performance, implementation, or cost. Include the key marketable features of the technology, such as treatment niche and advantages over other technologies. EXAMPLE Technology Highlights The SUPER solvent extraction process can treat soils, sludges, and sediments contaminated with PCBs, carcinogenic PAHs, pesticides, and VOCs at 20% to 40% of incineration costs. Treated products from the SUPER process include: water suitable for discharge, oil for recycle as fuel, and solids that can be returned to the site as backfill. The process also can reduce the initial volume of contaminated material by as much as 90%. The SUPER solvent extraction process operates at near ambient pressures and temperatures, uses off-the-shelf process equipment, and controls air emissions. The extraction efficiency (organic removal efficiency) achieved is as high as 99%. Solvent recovery is also greater than 99%. The process can treat up to 300 tons per day of contaminated soil. This technology is well accepted by communities because air emissions are minimized. ------- Vendor Name Technology Type PART 1: GENERAL INFORMATION AND TECHNOLOGY OVERVIEW (continued) 17. Technical Limitations. In 200 words or less, describe the technical limitations such as specific contaminants or contaminant combinations, temperature, moisture content, or chemical properties of the contaminant, that could adversely affect applicability or performance. EXAMPLE Technology Limitations The SUPER process is not applicable for metal-only, (e.g., radioactive) or other inorganic wastes, but its performance is not affected by inorganics at low concentrations. This process may require screening or crushing to 0.25 inch, and other feed preparation operations, depending on the waste. The extraction efficiency of an organic contaminant will depend on its solubility in the solvent. The solvent used is best suited for PCBs and pesticides. ------- Vendor Name Technology Type PART 1: GENERAL INFORMATION AND TECHNOLOGY OVERVIEW (continued) 18. Other Comments. In 200 words or less, provide additional information about the technology, such as its history, status, capabilities, and experience and applicable permits obtained (for example, TSCA or RCRA). Also describe plans for future development of the technology, including diversification of media and/or contaminants treated. EXAMPLE Other Comments The SUPER process has been demonstrated successfully at bench scale, pilot scale, and full scale. A full-scale SUPER unit was used to treat sludges contaminated with PCBs at the BAD Oil Refinfng Superfund site. Two pilot-scale units have been built. One was operated under the SITE program to treat soils and sludges contaminated with PCBs. Bench-scale treatability studies have been conducted on contaminated soils containing petrochemical compounds, pharmaceutical compounds, pesticides, PCBs, and wood preserving wastes containing PAHs. ------- Vendor Name Technology Type PART 1: GENERAL INFORMATION AND TECHNOLOGY OVERVIEW (continued) 19. Technology Scale. Check only one. status of the technology. Using the following definitions, indicate the operational a. I I Full scale. Available equipment is sized and commercially available for actual site remediation. (If you select full scale, you must fill out Pan 2). b. l_l Pilot scale. Available equipment is of sufficient size to verify technology feasibility or establish the design and operating conditions for a full-scale system. However, it is not of the size typically used for a cleanup. (If you select pilot scale, you must fill out Part 3). c. L_l Bench scale or emerging. Technology has been shown to be feasible through the use of bench-top equipment in the laboratory. Data from these studies cannot be used to scale up the technology to full scale. 20. Media treated. Check "actual" for all media that have been treated by your technology. Check "potential" for all media to which the technology may be applied in the future. Soil (in situ) Soil (ex situ) Sludge (does not include municipal sewage sludge) Solid (for example, slag) Natural sediment (in situ) Natural sediment (ex situ) Ground water (in situ) [Includes treatment of ground water and/or saturated soil] Off-gas generated from a primary innovative treatment technology Dense nonziqueous phase liquids (DNAPL) [in situ] Light nonaqueous phase liquids (LNAPL) [in situ] Actual a a a a a a a a a a Potential a a a a a a a a a a 21. Contaminants and Contaminant Groups Treated. Check all that may apply. Check "actual" for all that have been treated by your technology (that is, data exist). Check "potential" for all that the technology may be applied to in the future. Data for actual contaminants treated should be included in Part 5 (see Appendix B for key to contaminant groups). If your technology is materials handling/physical separation, delivery/extraction, or if you are an equipment vendor, this question may not apply. Actual Potential a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a Halogenated volatiUss Halogenated semivolatiles Nonhalogenated volatiles Nonhalogenated semivolatiles Organic pesticides/herbicides Dioxins/furans PCBs Polynuclear aromatics (PNA) Solvents Benzene-toluene-ethylbenzene- xylene (BTEX) Acetonitrile (organic cyanide) Organic acids Actual Potential a a a a a a a a a a a a Heavy metals Nonmetallic toxic elements Radioactive metals Asbestos Inorganic cyanides Inorganic corrosives Miscellaneous L_l LJ Explosives/propellants L_l LJ Organometallic pesticides/herbicides Q Q Other (specify) ------- Vendor Name Technology Type PART 1: GENERAL INFORMATION AND TECHNOLOGY OVERVIEW (continued) 22. Industrial Waste Sources or Site Types of Sites Treated. Check all that may apply. Check "actual" for all that have been treated by your technology (that is, data exist). Check "potential" for all that the technology may be applied to in the future. Treatment data should be available for those sites for which "actual" is checked. See Table A for wastes typically associated with each industry. Actual Potential a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a I—I Agriculture LJ Battery recycling/disposal LJ Chloro-alkali manufacturing Coal gasification Dry cleaning Electroplating I I Gasoline service station/petroleum storage facility LJ Herbicide manufacturing/use O Industrial landfills L_l Inorganic/organic pigments I I Machine shops I I Metal ore mining and smelting LJ Municipal landfill Actual Potential a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a Munitions manufacturing Paint/ink formulation Pesticide manufacturing/use LJ Petroleum refining and reuse LJ Photographic products Plastics manufacturing Pulp and paper industry LJ Other organic chemical manufacturing LJ Other inorganic chemical manufacturing LJ Semiconductor manufacturing LJ Rubber manufacturing LJ Wood preserving LJ Uranium mining a a a a Others (specify) 23. Vendor Services. Check all that apply. LJ Equipment manufacturer LJ Subcontractor for cleanup services LJ Prime contractor for full-service remediation LJ Other (specify) . ------- Vendor Name Technology Type PART 1: GENERAL INFORMATION AND TECHNOLOGY OVERVIEW (continued) Table A ~ Contaminants/Wastes Associated With Industrial Waste Sources or Types of Sites 1. Agriculture 2. Battery recycling/disposal 3. Chloro-alkali manufacturing 4. Coal gasification 5. Dry cleaning 6. Electroplating 7. Herbicide manufacturing/use 8. Industrial landfills 9. Inorganic/organic pigments 10. Machine shops 11. Metal ore mining and smelting 12. Municipal landfills 13. Munitions manufacturing 14. Paint/ink formulation 15. Pesticide manufacturing/use 16. Petroleum refining and reuse 17. Photographic products 18. Plastics manufacturing 19. Pulp and paper industry 20. Other organic chemical manufacturing 21. Other inorganic chemical manufacturing 22. Semiconductor manufacturing 23. Rubber manufacturing 24. Wood preserving 25. Uranium mining Pesticides Lead (acid) Chlorine compounds, mercury PAHs Solvents Chrome, metals Pesticides Wastes from Multiple Sources Solvents, chrome, zinc Metals, oils Metals Wastes from multiple sources Explosives, lead Solvents, some metals (chrome, zinc) Pesticides Petroleum, hydrocarbons, BTEX Silver, bromide, solvent Polymers, phthalates Chlorinated organics, dioxins Organics, metals (used as catalyst) : Inorganics, metals Degreasing agents (solvents), metals Rubber, plastics, polymers, organics Creosote, PCP, arsenic, chrome, PAHs Uranium, radioactive metals LO ------- Vendor Name Technology Type PART 2: FULL-SCALE EQUIPMENT/CAPABILITIES You must complete this part if you checked Response 17a (that is, technology is at full scale). You also may complete this part if the technology is at pilot scale. 24. Major Unit Processes. In 300 words or less, describe the steps and operation of the full-scale system, including list of key components. Also describe any pre- and post-processing required by your technology. Provide more detail than you did in Question 13. EXAMPLE Major Unit Processes Preprocessing • Front-end loader and weight scale • Shredder • Radial stacker belt conveyor and surge hopper 1. StockpHed soil is transported to a weigh scale by a front-end loader. 2. Soil is deposited directly on a power shredding device. Classified soil with a top size of less than 2 inches passes through the shredder into the feed conveyor. 3. The feed conveyor is an enclosed radial stacker belt conveyor that is 18 inches wide and 60 feet long. The conveyor discharges into the surge hopper located above the thermal processor. The soil is fed into the LT system at regular intervals to maintain the surge hopper seal. Processing • Thermal processor • Induced draft (ID) fan for vapors • Horizontal screw conveyor and ash conditioner 1. The thermal processor houses four intermeshed screw conveyors. The function of each screw conveyor is to move soil forward through the processor and to thoroughly mix the material, providing indirect contact between the heat transfer fluid and the soil. The shafts and flights of the screw conveyors and the processor jackets are hollow to allow circulation of a heat transfer fluid (that is, hot oil). 2. Vapors are driven off the soil and are drawn out of the thermal processor by an ID fan. 3. Soil is discharged from the thermal processor onto a horizontal screw conveyor and then an ash conditioner. 4. The conditioner is a ribbon flight screw conveyor. Water spray nozzles installed in the conditioner housing cool the discharge material and minimize fugitive dust emissions. Postprocessing • Stacker belt conveyor and dump truck 1. The conditioner discharges onto an inclined stacker belt. The stacker belt conveys the wetted processed soil from the conditioner to the dump truck. 11 ------- Vendor Name Technology Type PART 2: FULL-SCALE EQUIPMENT/CAPABILITIES (continued) 24. Major Unit Processes (continued). 12 ------- Vendor Name Technology Type PART 2: FULL-SCALE EQUIPMENT/CAPABILITIES (continued) 25. Full-Scale Facility is (check one only) Q Transportable LJ Fixed LJ In situ D> City and State of fixed facility 26. Number of Full-Scale Systems. Planned/in design Under construction Constructed Projected completion Projected completion dates dates 27. Capacity Range. to (units) Q Not applicable 28. Estimated Price Range. Provide a "ballpark" estimate per unit of waste treated. Include waste preprocessing and exclude excavation, permitting, and disposal of residues. $ to $ per (units) 29. Factors Affecting Unit Price. With "1" the highest, rank any of the following items that will have a significant effect on the unit price. If the technology is in situ, excavation, and waste handling cannot affect price. Initial concentration of contaminant Site preparation Target concentration of contaminant Waste handling/preprocessing Amount of debris with waste Quantity of waste Characteristics of soil (classification, Depth of contamination permeability) Depth to ground water Utility/fuel rates Characteristics of residual waste Labor rates Moisture content of soil Other (specify) . 30. Full-Scale Cleanups. a. If you are a subcontractor or prime contractor, give the number of full-scale cleanups using your technology that your firm has initiated or completed. Consider only those applications of your technology that were applied at petroleum/hazardous waste sites. b. If you are an equipment manufacturer, give the number of full-scale cleanups by other firms using your technology of which you are aware. Consider only those applications of your technology that were applied at petroleum/hazardous waste sites. 13 ------- Vendor Name Technology Type PART 3: PILOT-SCALE EQUIPMENT/CAPABILITIES You must complete this part if you checked Response Question 17b. You also may complete this part if the technology is at full scale or bench scale. 31 ' etmen68', " T ^ ^ ^^ *" St6pS 3nd °peration of the P«ot-scale treatment system, mcludmg a list of the key components. Also describe any pre- and post- processing required by your technology. Provide more detail than you did in Question 13. EXAMPLE Major Unft Processes Pilot-scale testing involves processing the soils or hulk soils through various operations of reduced-size equipment that when set m ser.es, would be similar to a fulf-scafe operation. The equipment consists of: 1 . A hopper and screen for feed preparation; removal of tramp material and sizing, if needed. 2. A mixing or attrition tank where the prepared feed is introduced to the liquids. In the most basic system extraction of contaminant takes place at this stage. 3. A classification circuit, consisting of a sump, pump, and cyclone for separation of coarse sand gravet and organics from fine ctays and sifts. 4. If extraction of contaminant so requires, coarse material is subjected to a specific gravity (SG) separation through use of a vessel, cyclone, or hydrosizer. Contaminated smaller size mateffal (low SG) is separated from tne clean, coarse (high SG) material. * SCree"' aWl°U9h in fuff-sc^e operation, additional dryers (centrffuges) 6. Low SG organics containing contaminant are dewatered with a screen and colfected for disposal or secondary TfG STmstT. 7. Clays and silts are flocculated in a reaction tank and gravity-concentrated m a thickener or ctarifier. *' slcfnda^ processing S'ltS C°"tafnlnB contaminant are ^watered in a belt press and sent for disposal or dewaterins process is callected 3n* in some — 14 ------- Vendor Name Technology Type PART 3: PILOT-SCALE EQUIPMENT/CAPABILITIES (continued) 31. Major Unit Processes (continued). 32. Pilot-Scale Facility is (Check only one) LJ Transportable LJ Fixed b. City and State In Situ of fixed facility. 33. Number of Pilot-Scale Systems Planned/in design Under construction Constructed 34. How many times have you used this technology at your facility or at other locations to conduct pilot-scale studies on actual wastes? Count only once multiple studies pertaining to the same site, regardless of the number of different wastes or tests. Do not count tests on surrogate wastes. 35. Can you conduct pilot-scale treatability studies on some types of waste at your location? D Yes Q No At a contaminated site? Q Yes Q No 36. Capacity Range. Prorate capacity of batch processes. This range should be consistent with your answer to Question 35 (the waste requirement for the pilot-scale treatability study). to (units) Q Not applicable 37. Quantity of Waste Needed for Pilot-Scale Treatability Study. Give the estimated range of quantity of waste needed to test, at the pilot scale, the feasibility of this technology on a specific waste. to (units) 15 ------- Vendor Name Technology Type PART 4: TREATABILITY STUDY CAPABILITIES (BENCH SCALE) 38. Can you conduct bench-scale treatabiiity studies on some types of waste at your location? Q Yes Q No 39. Number of Bench-Scale Studies Conducted. Estimate total number of bench-scale studies conducted on actual waste from different sources or sites. Count only once multiple studies pertaining to the same site, regardless of the number of different wastes or tests. Do not count tests on surrogate wastes. 40. Description of Bench-Scale Testing Procedures. In 200 words or less, describe the type of test that would be performed to determine feasibility of this technology for treating a specific waste. EXAMPLE Description of Bench-Scale Testing Procedures In our feasibility assessment tests, we> usually start with a sample of the soil to be treated and a knowledge of the nature and of each contaminant concentration and the effluent goafs to be met. The following steps then are taken: a. The optimal conditions for soil washing are studied, such as pH, time, and chefating agent and concentration. b. Various lifcely adsorbents are studied on a batch basis to determine which are most effective at removing the metals of interest from the chelaling agent in the washing water. c. One or more selected media than are studied on columns to determine their ability to retain metals in a continuous-flow situation.. d. For the surviving adsorbent(s), the ion elution performance then is determined; after this step, one resin will have been selected as optimal for the particular task under study. e. The selected adsorbent then is isufajected to a number of charge and regeneration cycles to establish its ruggedness. 16 ------- v cnuor iodine Technology Type PART 5: REPRESENTATIVE APPLICATIONS, CLIENT REFERENCES, AND PERFORMANCE DATA 41. List as many as five representative projects that also can serve as references. List information for only one project per sheet. For projects that have more than one application, fill out a separate sheet for each application. Provide only the performance data that is specific to each project listed. Full- and pilot-scale projects are of most importance. EPA reserves the right to add information on projects conducted for the federal government of which EPA is aware. Site Name or Industry Type if Client ntity Is Confidential: Sito Type or Waste Source (Check all that apply) Agriculture Battery recycling/disposal Chloro-alkali manufacturing Coal gasification Dry cleaning Electroplating Gasoline service station/petroleum storage facility Herbicide manufacturing/use Industrial landfills Inorganic/organic pigments Machine shops Metal ore mining and smelting Municipal Landfill Munitions Manufacturing Paint/ink formulation Pesticide manufacturing/use Petroleum refining and reuse Photographic products Plastics manufacturing Pulp and paper industry Other organic chemical manufacturing Other inorganic chemical manufacturing Semiconductor manufacturing Rubber manufacturing Wood preserving Uranium mining Others (specify) .ocation City State/Province: Country Project took place at site named Yes No At another site (that is, a Test facility) Yes No Regulation/Statute/Organization (Check all that apply) Application or Project Type (Check all that apply) RCRA corrective action CERCLA TSCA Safe Drinking Water Act UST corrective action State (specify) DOD DOE Other (Specify) Full-scale cleanup Field demonstration Pilot-scale treatability study Bench-scale treatability study RCRA Research, Development, and Demonstration TSCA National Demonstration TSCA Research and Development EPA SITE Demonstration Program EPA SITE Emerging Technology Program Research Other Ispecify) Media Treated (Check all that apply) Not Applicable Soil (in situ) Soil (ex situ) Sludge Solid Natural sediment (in situ) Natural sediment (ex situ) Ground water in situ Off-gas from a primary treatment technology Dense nonaqueous phase liquids (DNAPU [in situ] Light nonaqueous phase liquids (LNAPL) [in situ] Other: Volume/Quantity Treated Equipment Scale (Check one only) (Units) Area treated (for in situ projects) (Units) Depth treated (for in situ projects) (Units) Bench Pilot Full Project Status Contracted Month In cleanup Yes Completed Month _Year No Year 17 ------- Technology Type PART 5: REPRESENTATIVE APPLICATIONS, CLIENT REFERENCES, AND PERFORMANCE DATA (continued) a. (continued) Note: (1) List one specific contaminant per line. Do not list such entire contaminant groups as VOCs or solvents. TPH, which can be anailyzed using a specific test method, can be listed as an individual contaminant. (2) and (3) Indicate the appropriate units; for concentrations that were non-detect write N.D.; treated concentration should be lower than untreated concentration unless the technology is dewatering or some other volume reduction method. If a concentration range cannot be given, provide an average and note it as such. (4) Specify the cleanup standard or goal, if known, for the individual contaminant for this project. For example, if the project was part of a Superfund remedial action, the cleanup goal is specified in the record of decision (ROD) for that site. Performance Data (1) Contaminant or Pollutant Parameter (Example) Benzene (2) Untreated Concentration Range (Min to Max) 50-150 (3) Units mg/kg (2) Treated Concentration Range (Min to Max) 25-50 (3) Units mg/kg (4) Cleanup Standard or Goal 50 (3) Units mg/kg Comments on Performance Data Cost Information Estimated or actual total and/or unit cost for this project $ per (unit) $ (total) What items or activities are included in these cost(s) (e.g., mobilization, demobilization, excavation, waste handling)? Person outside of company familiar with project (optional) Name Company Address Phone Is Literature Available on this Project? (You may wish to include these citations in Part 6) Yes No Additional project information site conditions, mode of operation, and other pertinent information . 18 ------- Vendor Name Technology Type PART 5: REPRESENTATIVE APPLICATIONS, CLIENT REFERENCES, AND PERFORMANCE DATA (continued) b. Sit* Namo or Industry Typ« H CSarrt Sita Typo or Waste Source (Chack all that apply) Agriculture Battery recycling/disposal Chloro-alkali manufacturing Coal gasification Dry cleaning Electroplating Gasoline service station/petroleum storage facility Herbicide manufacturing/use Industrial landfills Inorganic/organic pigments Location City State/Province: Country Ragulntion/'Statuta/Organization (Check all that apply) RCRA corrective action CERCLA TSCA Safe Drinking Water Act UST corrective action State Ispecifvl DOD DOE Other (Specify) Not Applicable Volu m of Quantity Treated (Units) Araa treated (for in situ projects) (Units) Depth treated (for in situ projects) (Units) Machine shops Other inorganic chemical Metal ore mining and smelting Municipal Landfill Munitions Manufacturing Paint/ink formulation manufacturing Semiconductor manufacturing Rubber manufacturing Pesticide manufacturing/use Wood preserving Petroleum refining and reuse Uranium mining Photographic products Plastics manufacturing Pulp and paper industry Other organic chemical Others (specify) manufacturing Project took place at site named Yes No At another site (that is, a Test facility) Yes No Application or Project Type (Check all that apply) Full-scale cleanup EPA SITE Emerging Field demonstration Pilot-scale treatability study Technology Program Research Bench-scale treatability study Other (soecirvl RCRA Research, Development, and Demonstration TSCA National Demonstration TSCA Research and Development EPA SITE Demonstration Program Media Treated (Check all that apply) Soil (in situ) Off-gas from a primary Soil (ex situ) Sludge Solid Natural sediment (in situ) Natural sediment (ex situ) Ground water in situ treatment technology Dense nonaqueous phase liquids (DNAPL) (in situ] Light nonaqueous phase liquids (LNAPL) [in situ] Other: Equipment Scale (Check one only! Bench Pilot Full Project Status Contracted Month Year In cleanup Yes No Completed Month Year 19 ------- vendor name Technology Type PART 5: REPRESENTATIVE APPLICATIONS, CLIENT REFERENCES, AND PERFORMANCE DATA (continued) b. (continued) Note: (1) List one specific contaminant per line. Do not list such entire contaminant groups as VOCs or solvents. TPH, which can be analyzed using a specific test method, can be listed as an individual contaminant. (2) and (3) Indicate the appropriate units; for concentrations that were non-detect write N.D.; treated concentration should be lower than untreated concentration unless the technology is dewatering or some other volume reduction method. If a concentration range cannot be given, provide an average and note it as such. (4) Specify the cleanup standard or goal, if known, for the individual contaminant for this project. For example, if the project was part of a Superfund remedial action, the cleanup goal is specified in the record of decision (ROD) for that site. Performance Data (1) Contaminant or Pollutant Parameter (Example) Benzene Comments on Performanc (2) Untreated Concentration Range (Min to Max) 50-150 (3) Units mg/kg (2) Treated Concentration Range (Min to Max) 25 - 50 e Data (3) Units mg/kg (4) Cleanup Standard or Goat 50 (3) Units mg/kg Cost Information Estimated or actual total and/or unit cost for this project $ per (unit) $ (total) What items or activities are included in these cost(s) (e.g., mobilization, demobilization, excavation, waste handling)? Person outside of company familiar with project (optional) Name Comoiinv Address Is Literature Available on this Project? (You may wish to include these citations in Part 6) Yes No Additional project information site conditions, mode of operation, and other pertinent information ). 20 ------- Technology Type PART 5: REPRESENTATIVE APPLICATIONS, CLIENT REFERENCES, AND PERFORMANCE DATA (continued) Site Name or Industry Typ« W Client dantity is Confidential; Site Type or Waste Source (Check all that apply! Agriculture Battery recycling/disposal Chloro-alkali manufacturing Coal gasification Dry cleaning Electroplating Gasoline service station/petroleum storage facility Herbicide manufacturing/use Industrial landfills Inorganic/organic pigments Machine shops Metal ore mining and smelting Municipal Landfill Munitions Manufacturing Paint/ink formulation Pesticide manufacturing/use Petroleum refining and reuse Photographic products Plastics manufacturing Pulp and paper industry Other organic chemical manufacturing Other inorganic chemical manufacturing Semiconductor manufacturing Rubber manufacturing Wood preserving Uranium mining Others (specify) Location City State/Province: Country Project took place at site named Yes No At another site (that is, a Test facility) Yes No Regulation/Statute/Organization (Check oil that apply) Application or Project Type (Check all that apply! RCRA corrective action CERCLA TSCA Safe Drinking Water Act LIST corrective action State (specify) DOD DOE Other (Specify) Full-scale cleanup Field demonstration Pilot-scale treatability study Bench-scale treatability study RCRA Research, Development, and Demonstration TSCA National Demonstration TSCA Research and Development EPA SITE Demonstration Program EPA SITE Emerging Technology Program Research Other (specify) Media Treated (Check all that apply) Nat Applicable Soil (in situ) Soil (ex situ) Sludge Solid Natural sediment (in situ) Natural sediment (ex situ) Ground water in situ Off-gas from a primary treatment technology Dense nonaqueous phase liquids (DNAPL) [in situl Light nonaqueous phase liquids (LNAPL) [in situ] Other: Volume/Quantity Treated Equipment Scale (Check one only) (Units) Area treated (for in situ projects) (Units) Depth treated (for in situ projects) (Units) Bench Pilot Full Project Status Contracted Month In cleanup Yes Completed Month .Year No Year 21 ------- Technology Type PART 5: REPRESENTATIVE APPLICATIONS, CLIENT REFERENCES, AND PERFORMANCE DATA (continued) c. (continued) Note: (1) List one specific contaminant per line. Do not list such entire contaminant groups as VOCs or solvents. TPH, which can be analyzed using a specific test method, can be listed as an individual contaminant. (2) and (3) Indicate the appropriate units; for concentrations that were non-detect write N.D.; treated concentration should b« lower than untreated concentration unless the technology is dewatering or some other volume reduction method. If a concentration range cannot be given, provide an average and note it as such. (4) Specify the cleanup standard or goal, if known, for the individual contaminant for this project. For example, if the project was part of a Superfund remedial action, the cleanup goal is specified in the record of decision (ROD) for that site. Performance Data (11 Contaminant or Pollutant Parameter (Example) Benzene (2] Untreated Concentration Range (Min to Max) 50 - 1 50 (3) Units mg/kg (2) Treated Concentration Range (Min to Max) 25-50 (3) Units mg/kg (4) Cleanup Standard or Goal 50 (3) Units mg/kg & Comments on Performance Data Cost Information Estimated or actual total and/or unit cost for this project $ per (unit) $ (total) What items or activities are included in these cost(s) (e.g., mobilization, demobilization, excavation, waste handling)? Person outside of company familiar with project (optional) Name Company Address Phone Is Literature Available on this Project? (You may wish to include these citations in Part 6) Yes No Additional project information site conditions, mode of operation, and other pertinent information . 22 ------- Technology Type PART 5: REPRESENTATIVE APPLICATIONS, CLIENT REFERENCES, AND PERFORMANCE DATA (continued) d. Sita Name or Industry Typs if Client Identity is Confidential: Sita Type or Wasta Source (Check all that apply) Agriculture Battery recycling/disposal Chloro-alkali manufacturing Coal gasification Dry cleaning Electroplating Gasoline service station/petroleum storage facility Herbicide manufacturing/use Industrial landfills Inorganic/organic pigments _Machine shops _Metal ore mining and smelting _Municipal Landfill _Munitions Manufacturing _Paint/ink formulation _Pesticide manufacturing/use _Petroleum refining and reuse _Photographic products _Plastics manufacturing _Pulp and paper industry Other inorganic chemical manufacturing Semiconductor manufacturing Rubber manufacturing Wood preserving Uranium mining Others (specify) Other organic chemical manufacturing Location City State/Province: Country Project took place at site named Yes No At another site (that is, a Test facility) Yes No Regutation/Statute/Organization (Check all that appty) Application or Project Type (Check all that apply) RCRA corrective action CERCLA TSCA Safe Drinking Water Act UST corrective action State (specify) DOD DOE Other (Specify) Full-scale cleanup Field demonstration Pilot-scale treatability study Bench-scale treatability study RCRA Research, Development, and Demonstration TSCA National Demonstration TSCA Research and Development EPA SITE Demonstration Program EPA SITE Emerging Technology Program Research Other (specify) Media Treated (Check all that apply) Not Applicable Soil (in situ) Soil (ex situ) Sludge Solid Natural sediment (in situ) Natural sediment (ex situ) Ground water in situ Off-gas from a primary treatment technology Dense nonaqueous phase liquids (DNAPL) [in situ] Light nonaqueous phase liquids (LNAPL) [in situ] Other: Volume/Quantity Treated Equipment Scale (Check one only) (Units) Area treated (for in situ projects) (Units) Depth treated (for in situ projects) (Units) Bench Pilot Full Project Status Contracted Month In cleanup Yes Completed Month _Year No Year 23 ------- venaor Name Technology Type PART 5: REPRESENTATIVE APPLICATIONS, CLIENT REFERENCES, AND PERFORMANCE DATA (continued) d. (continued) Note: (1) List one specific contaminant per line. Do not list such entire contaminant groups as VOCs or solvents. TPH, which can be analyzed using a specific test method, can be listed as an individual contaminant. (2) and (3) Indicate the appropriate units; for concentrations that were non-detect write N.D.; treated concentration should be lower than untreated concentration unless the technology is dewatering or some other volume reduction method, if a concentration range cannot be given, provide an average and note it as such. (4) Specify the cleanup standard or goal, if known, for the individual contaminant for this project. For example, if the project was part of a Superfund remedial action, the cleanup goal is specified in the record of decision (ROD) for that site. Performance Data (1) Contaminant or Pollutant Parameter (Example) Benzene Comments on Performanc (2) Untreated Concentration Rancje (Min to Max) 50-150 (3) Units mg/kg (2) Treated Concentration Range (Min to Max) 25 - 50 (3) Units mg/kg (4) Cleanup Standard or Goat 50 (3) Units mg/kg e Data Cost Information Estimated or actual total and/or unit cost for this project $ per (unit) What items or activities are included in these cost(s) (e.g., mobilization, demobilization, excavation, waste handling)? Person outside of company familiar with project (optional) Is Literature Available on this Project? (You may wish to include these citations in Part 6) Name Company Address Yes No Additional project information site conditions, mode of operation, and other pertinent information ). - 24 ------- Vendor Name Technology Type PART 5: REPRESENTATIVE APPLICATIONS, CLIENT REFERENCES, AND PERFORMANCE DATA (continued) Sito Name or Industry Typ* it Client Site Typo or Waste Source (Check all that apply} Agriculture Machine shops Battery recycling/disposal Metal ore mining and smelting Chloro-alkali manufacturing Coal gasification Dry cleaning Electroplating Gasoline service station/petroleum storage facility Herbicide manufacturing/use Municipal Landfill Munitions Manufacturing Paint/ink formulation Pesticide manufacturing/use Petroleum refining and reuse Photographic products Plastics manufacturing Pulo and paper industry Industrial landfills Inorganic/organic pigments Location City StatejProvince: Country Regulation/Statute/Organization (Check all that apply) RCRA corrective action CEFtCLA TSC4 Safe Drinking Water Act UST corrective action State (specifvl DOD DOE Other (Specify) Not Applicable Volume/Quantity Treated (Units) Area treated (for in situ projects) (Units) Depth treated (for in situ projects) (Units) Other organic chemical manufacturing Project took place at site named Yes No Other inorganic chemical manufacturing Semiconductor manufacturing Rubber manufacturing Wood preserving Uranium mining Others Isoecifvi At another site (that is, a Test facility) Yes No Application or Project Typ« (Check all that apply} Full-scale cleanup Field demonstration Pilot-scale treatability study Bench-scale treatability study RCRA Research, Development, and Demonstration TSCA National Demonstration TSCA Research and Development EPA SITE Demonstration Program EPA SITE Emerging Technology Program Research Other (soecifv! Media Treated (Chock all that apply) Soil (in situ) Soil (ex situ) Sludqe Solid Natural sediment (in situ) Natural sediment (ex situ) Ground water in situ Equipment Scale (Check one only) Bench Pilot Full Off-gas from a primary treatment technology Dense nonaqueous phase liquids (DNAPL) [in situl Light nonaqueous phase liquids (LNAPU [in situ] Other: Project Status Contracted Month Year In cleanup Yes No Completed Month Year 25 ------- * ciJUUf ««aiiic Technology Type PART 5: REPRESENTATIVE APPLICATIONS, CLIENT REFERENCES, AND PERFORMANCE DATA (continued) e. (continued) Note: (1) List one specific contaminant per line. Do not list such entire contaminant groups as VOCs or solvents. TPH, which can be analyzed using a specific test method, can be listed as an individual contaminant. (2) and (3) Indicate the appropriate units; for concentrations that were non-detect write N.D.; treated concentration should be lower than untreated concentration unless the technology is dewatering or some other volume reduction method. If a concentration range cannot be given, provide an average and note it as such. (4) Specify the cleanup standard or goal, if known, for the individual contaminant for this project. For example, if the project was part of a Superfund remedial action, the cleanup goal is specified in the record of decision (ROD) for that site. Performance Data (11 Contaminant or Pollutant Parameter (Example) Benzene Comments on Performanc (2) Untreated Concentration Range (Min to Max) 50 - 1 50 (3) Units mg/kg (2) Treated Concentration Range (Min to Max) 25 - 50 e Data (3) Units mg/kg (4) Cleanup Standard or Goat 50 (3) Units mg/kg Cost Information Estimated or actual total and/or unit cost for this project $ per (unit) $ (total) What items or activities are included in these cost(s) (e.g., mobilization, demobilization, excavation, waste handling)? Person outside of company familiar with project (optional) Name Comoanv Address Phone _ Is Literature Available on this Project? (You may wish to include these citations in Part 6) Yes No Additional project information site conditions, mode of operation, and other pertinent information . 26 ------- vendor Name Technology Type PART 6: LITERATURE AND TECHNICAL REFERENCES 42. List and attach available documentation (for example, journal articles, conference papers, patents) that best describes technology and vendor capabilities. References that contain performance and cost data are of particular interest. Do not include personal references. EPA reserves the right to add to the list other publicly available references. Author(s) Title Journal/Conference Data NTIS/EPA Document Number(s) Author(s) Title Journal/Conference Date NTIS/EPA Document Number(s) Author(s) Title Journal/Conference Date NTIS/EPA Document Number(s) Author(s) Title Journal/Conference Date NTIS/EPA Document Number(s) Author(s) Title Journal/Conference Date NTIS/EPA Document Number(s) 27 ------- TfflS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK ------- APPENDIX A BUSINESS CLASSIFICATION INFORMATION The following information is intended to be used as a reference to answer question 2e. SIC code information and definitions are given below. To determine if your company is a small and/or disadvantaged business first identify the Standard Industrial Classification (SIC) code for your company and secondly identify whether or not your company qualifies as a small business under that SIC code. Small and disadvantaged businesses are defined below. Definition of SIC Code Standard Industrial Classification (SIC) Code - refers to the four-digit number assigned by the government to classify establishments by the type of activity in which they are engaged. The codes are published by the Government in the Standard Industrial Classification Manual. The Manual is intended to cover the entire field of economic activities. It classifies and defines activities by industry categories and is the source used by the Small Business Administration (SBA) as a guide in defining industries for size standards. The number of employees or annual receipts indicates the maximum allowed for a concern, including its affiliates, to be considered small (Federal Acquisition Circular (FAC) 90-16, December 21, 1992, Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR), 19.102(g)). Most remediation firms should fall under one of the SIC codes defined below: The following SIC code definitions are taken from the Standard Industrial Classification Manual, 1987, Office of Management and Budget. SIC code 4953: Refuse Systems (i.e., activities related to actual site cleanup) Establishments primarily engaged in the collection and disposal of refuse by processing or destruction or in the operation of incinerators, waste treatment plans, landfills, or other sites for disposal of such materials. Establishments primarily engaged in collecting and transporting refuse without such disposal are classified in Transportation, Industry 4212. Acid waste, collection and disposal of Ashes, collection and disposal of Dumps, operation of Garbage: collecting, destroying, and processing Hazardous waste material disposal sites Incinerator operation Landfill, sanitary: operation of Radioactive waste materials, disposal of Refuse systems Rubbish collection and disposal Sludge disposal sites Street refuse systems Waste materials disposal at sea SIC code 8711: Engineering Services (i.e., activities related to remedial investigations, feasibility studies, and remedial design) Establishments primarily engaged in providing professional engineering services. Establishments primarily providing and supervising their own engineering staff on temporary contract to other firms are included in this industry. Establishments providing engineering A-l ------- personnel, but not general supervision, are classified in Industry 7363. Establishments primarily engaged in providing architectural engineering services are classified in Industry 8712, and those providing photogrammetric engineering services are classified in Industry 8713. Designing: ship, boat, and machine Engineering services: industrial, civil, electrical, mechanical, petroleum, marine, and design Definitions of Small and Disadvanta^ed/Minoritv Business Machine tool designers Marine engineering services Petroleum engineering services The following small business size standards established by the SBA are taken from FAC90-16 December 21, 1992, FAR 19.102. SIC Code Description Size 4943 8711 Refuse Systems $6.0 million Engineering Services Military and Aerospace Equipment and Military Weapons $13.5 million Marine Engineering and Naval Architecture $9.0 million Other Engineering Services .' " $2.5 million The following information is taken from FAC 90-16 December 21, 1992, FAR 19.101. Small business concern - means a concern, including its affiliates, that is independently owned and operated, not dominant in the field of operation in which it is bidding on government contracts and qualified as a small business under the criteria and size standards in 13 CFR Part 121 Such a concern is "not dominant in its field of operation" when it does not exercise a controlling or major influence on a national basis in a kind of business activity in which a number of business concerns are primarily engaged. In determining whether dominance exists, consideration shall be given to all appropriate factors, including volume of business, number of employees, financial resources competitive status or position, ownersMp or control of materials, processes, patents, license ' agreements, facilities, sales territory, and nature of business activity. Small disadvantaged/minority busings concern - means a small business concern that is at least 51 percent unconditionally owned by one or more individuals who are both socially and economically disadvantage*!, or a publicly owned business that has at least 51 percent of its stock unconditionally owned by one or more socially and economically disadvantage individuals and that has its management and daily business controlled by one or more such individuals. This term also means a small business concern that is at least 51 percent unconditionally owned by an economically disadvantaged Indian tribe or Native Hawaiian Organization, or a publicly owned business that has at least 51 percent of its stock unconditionally owned by one of these entities, that has its management A-2 ------- and daily business controlled by members of an economically disadvantaged Indian tribe or Native Hawaiian Organization, and that meets the requirements of 13 CFR 124. (a) "Socially disadvantaged individuals" means individuals who have been subjected to racial or ethnic prejudice or cultural bias because of their identify as a member of a group without regard to their qualities as individuals. (b) "Economically disadvantaged individuals" means socially disadvantaged individuals whose ability to compete in the free enterprise system is impaired due to diminished opportunities to obtain capital and credit as compared to others in the same line of business who are not socially disadvantaged. Individuals who certify that they are members of named groups (Black Americans, Hispanic Americans, Native Americans, Asian-Pacific Americans, Subcontinent-Asian Americans) are to be considered socially and economically disadvantaged. (1) "Subcontinent Asian Americans" means United States citizens whose origins are in India, Pakistan, Bangladesh, Sri Lanka, Bhutan, or Nepal. (2) "Asian Pacific Americans" means United States citizens whose origins are in Japan, China, the Philippines, Vietnam, Korea, Samoa, Guam, the U.S. Trust Territory of the Pacific Islands (Republic of Palau), the Northern Mariana Islands, Laos, Kampuchea (Cambodia), Taiwan, Burma, Thailand, Malaysia, Indonesia, Singapore, Brunei, Republic of the Marshall Islands, or the Federated States of Micronesia. (3) "Native Americans" means American Indians, Eskimos, Aleuts, and Native Hawaiians. (c) "Native Hawaiian Organization" means any community service organization serving Native Hawaiians in, and chartered as a not-for-profit organization by, the State of Hawaii, which is controlled by Native Hawaiians, and whose business activities will principally benefit such Native Hawaiians. (d) "Indian tribe" means any Indian tribe, band, nation, or other organized group or community of Indians, including any Alaska Native Corporation as defined in 13 CFR 124.100 which is recognized as eligible for the special programs and services provided by the U.S. to Indians because of their status as Indians, or which is recognized as such by the State in which such tribe, band, nation, group, or community resides. Women-owned - as used in this form, means a business that is at least 51 percent owned by a woman or women who are U.S. citizens and who also control and operate the business. A-3 ------- APPENDIX B KEY TO CONTAMINANT GROUPS CONTAMINANT GROUP CODES FOR HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES LIST Qr |p |Ł |F f Halogenated volatiles Halogenated semivolatiles Nonhalogenated volatiles Nonhalogenated semivolatiles Organic pesticides/herbicides Dioxins/furans PCBs Polynuclear aromatics (PNAs) Solvents Benzene-toluene-ethylbenzene-xylene (BTEX) Organic cyanide Organic corrosives Inorganic [jyj| Heavy metals |N | Nonmetallic toxic elements (As, F) |Q | Radioactive metals |p | Asbestos |Q | Inorganic cyanides |R | Inorganic corrosives Miscellaneous |S | Explosives/propellants [T | Organometallic pesticides/herbicides B-l ------- HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES Organic Contaminant Group CAS No. 208968 Acenaphthylene D,H 83329 Acenaphihene D,H 75070 Acetaldehyde C 67641 Acetone C,I 75058 Acetonitrile C,K 98862 Acetophenone D 591082 Acetyl-2-thiourea, 1 D 107028 Acrolein . . . . C 79061 Acrylamide D 79107 Acrylic acid CL 107131 Acrylonitrile C 124049 Adipic acid L 116063 Aldicarb E 309002 Aldrin E 107186 AHyl alcohol E 62533 Aniline D,I,L 120127 Anthracene D,H 1912249 Atrazine E 2642719 Azinphos-ethyl E 86500 Azinphos-methyl E 151564 Aziridine C 71432 Benzene C,I,J 98884 Benzene carbonyl chloride B 92875 Benzidine D 205992 Benzofluoranthene,3,4- H 65850 Benzoic acid D,L 100470 Benzonitrile C,I 95169 Benzothiazole,l,2- D,I 50328 Benzo (a) pyrene D,H 206440 Benzo (j,k) fluorene H 207089 Benzo (k) fluoranthene D,H 100447 Benzyl chloride A 56553 Benz (a) anthracene D,H 117817 Bis (2-ethyl hexyl) phthalate D 111911 Bis (2-chloroethoxy) methane B 111444 Bis (2-chloroethyl) ether B 542881 Bis (chloromethyl) ether ........ B 75274 Bromodichloromethane A 74964 Bromomethane A 1689845 Bromoxynil E 106990 Butadiene, 1,3- C 71363 Butanol C 85687 Butlbenzyl phthalate D 94826 Butyric acid, 4-2(2,4-dichlorop) . . . C,L CAS No. 133062 63252 1563662 75150 56235 78196 75876 57749 106478 108907 67663 74873 107302 106898 91587 95578 59507 2921882 218019 56724 8021394 108394 106445 98828 21725462 110827 108941 72548 72559 50293 78488 333415 132649 53703 124481 106934 96128 1918009 95501 541731 106467 91941 75718 75343 Captan B Carbaryl E Carbofuran E,F Carbon disulfide C Carbon tetrachloride A Carbophenothion E Chloral A Chlordane E Chloroaniline, p- B Chlorobenzene A Chloroform A Chloromethane A Chloromethyl methyl ether A Chloromethyloxirane, 2- E Chloronaphthalene, 2- B Chlorophenol, 2- B Chloro-3-methylphenol, 4- B Chloropyrifos E Chrysene D,H Coumaphos E Creosote H Cresol, m- D Cresol, p- D Cumene C,I Cyanazine E Cyclohexane C,I Cyclohexanone C ODD E DDE .- E DDT E DBF C.E Diazinon E Dibenzofuran D Dibenz (a,h) anthracene D,H Dibromachloromethane A Dibromoethane, 1,2- A Dibromo-3-chloropropane, 1,2- ... A Dicamba E Dichlorobenzene, 1,2- B Dichlorobenzene, 1,3- B Dichlorobenzene, 1,4- B Dichlorobenzidine, 3,3- B Dichlorodifiuoromethane A Dichloroethane, 1,1- A B-2 ------- CAS No. CAS No. 107062 Dichloroethane, 1,2- A 75354 Dichloroethene, 1,1- A 156592 Dichloroethylene, cis-1,2- A 156605 Dichloroethylene, trans-1,2- A 120832 Dichlorophenol, 2,4- B 94757 Dichlorophenoxyacetic acid, 2- .... L 78875 Dichloropropane, 1,2- A 542756 Dichloropropene, 1,3- A 62737 Dichlorvos E 115322 Dicofol E 60571 Dieldrin E 84662 Diethyl phthalate . D 111466 Diethylene glycol D,I 1660942 Diisopropylmethylphosphonate . . . . D 60515 Dimethoate E 119904 Dimethoxybenzidine, 3,3- D 105679 Dimethyl phenol, 2,4- D 13113 Dimethyl phthalate D 77781 Dimethyl sulfate C 99650 Dinitrobenzene, 1,3- D 51285 Dinitrophenol, 2,4- D 121142 Dinitrotoluene, 2,4- D 606202 Dinitrotoluene, 2,6- D 88857 Dinoseb E 123911 Dioxane, 1,4 . . C 78342 Dioxathion E 122667 Diphenylhydrazine, 1,2- D,H 85007 Diquat E 298044 Disulfoton C,E 330541 Diuron E 84742 Di-n-butyl phthalate D 117840 Di-n-octyl phthalate D 115297 Endosulfan E 959988 Endosulfan I 33212659 Endosulfan II E 1031078 Endolsulfan sulfate E 145733 Endothall E 72208 Endrin E 7421934 Endrin aldehyde E 563122 Ethion E 141786 Ethyl acetate C 100414 Ethyl benzene C,J 75003 Ethyl chloride A,I 60297 Ethyl ether C 107211 Ethylene glycol I 110805 Ethylene glycol monoethyl ether C,I 759944 Ethylpropylthio carbomate, S- . . . . E 122145 86737 50000 64186 110009 98011 765344 76448 1024573 118741 87683 60873 60873 60873 77474 67721 70304 110543 1689834 78831 78591 143500 58899 121755 108316 123331 126987 67561 16752775 72435 79221 78933 108101 80626 101144 75092 23855 91203 100016 98953 100027 . Fenitrothion Fluorene Formaldehyde Formic acid Furan Furfural Glycidyaldehyde Heptachlor Heptachlor epoxide Hexachlorobenzene Hexachlorobutadieene Hexachlorocyclohexane, alpha- . . Hexachlorocyclohexane, beta- . . Hexachlorocyclohexane, delta- . . Hexachlorocyclopentadiene .... Hexachloroethane Hexachlorophene Hexane loxynil Isobutanol Isophorone Kepone Lindane . Malathion Maleic anhydride Maleric hydrazide Methacrylonitrile Methanol Methomyl Methoxychlor Methyl chlorocarbonate Methyl ethyl ketone Methyl isobutyl ketone Methyl methacrylate Methylene bis (2-chloroaniline) Methylene chloride Mirex Naphthalene Nitroaniline, p- Nitrobenzene Nitrophenol, 4- . . E . . D,H . . C . . L . . F I.C G . . E . . E . . B . . B . . E . . E . . E . . B . . B . . B . . C,I . . E . . C D E E . . C,E . . E . . E . . C . . C . . E . . E . . L . . C . . C,I . . C . . B . . A E . . D,H . . D . . D . . D B-3 ------- Organic Contaminant Group (continued) CAS No. 1116547 Nitrosodiethanolamine, n- D 55185 Nitrosodiethylamine, n- D 62759 Nitrosodimethylamine, n- D 86306 Nitrosodiphenylamine, n- D 930552 Nitrosopyrrolidine, n- D 924163 Nitroso-di-n-butylamine, n- D 615532 Nitroso-di-n-methylurethane, n- . . . D 99990 Nitrotoluene, 4- D 56382 Parathion, ethyl- E 298000 Parathion, methyl- E 1336363 PCBs G 608935 Pentachlorobenzene B 76017 Pentachloroethane B 82688 Pentachloronitrobenzene B 87865 Pentachlorophenol B 85018 Phenanthrene D,H 108952 Phenol D 139662 Phenyl sulfide D 62384 Phenylmercurie acetate E 298022 Phorate C,E 75445 Phosgene E 13171216 Phosphamidon E 7803512 Phosphine E 85449 Phthalic anhydride D,E 23950585 Pronamide D 129000 Pyrene D,H 110861 Pyridine C,I 91225 Quinoline D,H 108463 Resorcinol D 299843 Ronnel E 57249 Strychnine E,H 100425 Styrene C CAS No. 746016 95943 630206 79345 127184 58902 3689245 109999 137268 108883 584849 8001352 93721 75252 120821 71556 79005 79016 75694 933788 95954 88062 609198 93765 933788 27323417 126727 TCDD F Tetrachlorobenzene, 1,2,4,5- B Tetrachloroethane, 1,1,1,2- ...... A,E,I Tetrachloroethane, 1,1,2,2- A Tetrachloroethene A Tetrachlorophenol, 2,3,4,6 B Tetraethyldithiopyrophosphate . . . . E Tetrahydrofuran F,I Thiram E Toluene C,J Toluene diisocyanate D Toxaphene E TP, 2,4,5- E Tribromomethane A Trichlorobenzene, 1,2,4- B Trichloroethane, 1,1,1- A Trichloroethane, 1,1,2- A Trichloroethylene A Trichlorofluoromethane A Trichlorophenol, 2,3,5- B Trichlorophenol, 2,4,5- B Trichlorophenol, 2,4,6- B Trichlorophenol, 3,4,5- B Trichlorophenoxyacetic acid, 2- . . . L Trichloro-l,2,2-trifluoroethane .... A,I Triethanolamine E Tris (2,3-dibromopropyl) phosphate . B 108054 Vinyl acetate C 75014 Vinyl chloride A 81812 Warfarin E 108383 Xylene, m- C,J 95476 Xylene, o- C,J 106423 Xylene, p- C,J B-4 ------- Inorganic Contaminant Group CAS No. 7429905 20859738 7440360 7440382 1327533 1303339 7440393 542621 7440417 7440439 13765190 7778543 1333820 7440473 7440484 7440508 544923 7720787 7439896 7439921 7439965 7439976 7440020 7718549 10102440 7789006 151508 506616 7783008 7782492 7440224 506649 7440235 26628228 7681494 7775113 Aluminum Aluminum phosphide Antimony Arsenic Arsenic trioxide Arsenic trisulfide Barium Barium cyanide Beryllium Cadmium . . . Calcium chromate Calcium hypochlorite Chromic acid Chromium Chromium (III) Chromium (VI) Cobalt . .... Cooper Copper cyanide Ferrous sulfate Iron Lead Manganese Mercury Nickel Nickel chloride Nitrogen dioxide Potassium chromate Potassium cyanide Potassium silver cyanide .... Selenious acid Selenium Silver Silver cyanide Sodium Sodium azide Sodium fluoride Sodium chromate . . . . M . . . . M . . . . M . . . . M . . . . M . . . . M M .... M,Q . . . M . . . . M M . . . . M . . . . M,R . . . . M M . , . . M . . . . M . . . . M .... M,Q . . . . M . . . M . . . . M . . . . M M . . . . M . . . . M . . . . R . . . . M . ; . . M,Q M,Q ....MR . . . . M . . . . M .... M,Q . . . . M . . . . M . , . M . . . . M CAS No. 143339 1310732 7440280 1314325 563688 6533739 7791120 10102451 12039520 7446186 7440291 1314621 7440666 557211 1314847 7733020 Explosive) CAS No. 7664417 131748 7773060 460195 2691410 302012 55630 99990 26628228 99354 118967 Organom< CAS No. 630104 78002 Sodium cyanide Sodium hydroxide Thallium Thallic oxide Thallium acetate Thallium carbonate ... Thallium chloride Thallium nitrate Thallium selenide Thallium (I) sulfate Thorium . . Vanadium pentoxide Zinc . Zinc cyanide Zinc phosphide Zinc sulfate Tropellants Ammonia Ammonium picrate Ammonium sulfamate Cyanogen Cyclotetramethylenetetranitramine . Hydrazine Nitroglycerine Nitrotoluene, 4- Sodium azide Trinitrobenzene 135 Trinitrotoluene itallic Compound Selenourea .... Tetraethyl lead . . . M Q . M R . M M M M . M M M . M M . M M . M,Q M . M . S s s s . s s s . s . M S s s u u B-5 ------- THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK ------- Appendix C List of VISITT 4.0 Vendors by Technology ACID EXTRACTION ADVANCED RECOVERY SYSTEMS, INC. CENTER FOR HAZARDOUS MATERIALS RESEARCH COGNIS, INC. COGNIS, INC. EARTH TREATMENT TECHNOLOGIES, INC. IT CORPORATION LOCKHEED CORPORATION ADSORPTION/ABSORPTION - IN SITU DYNAPHORE, INC. ENVIRONMENTAL FUEL SYSTEMS, INC. AIR SPARGING BILLINGS & ASSOCIATES, INC. ENVIROGEN, INC. HAYWARD BAKER ENVIRONMENTAL, INC. HORIZONTAL TECHNOLOGIES, INC. IEG TECHNOLOGIES CORP. IT CORPORATION QUATERNARY INVESTIGATIONS, INC. TERRA VAC, INC. BIOREMEDIATION - IN SITU GROUNDWATER ABB ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC. BIO-GENESIS TECHNOLOGIES ECOLOGY TECHNOLOGIES INTERNATIONAL, INC. ECOTECHNIEK B.V. ELECTROKINETICS, INC. ENSR CONSULTING AND ENGINEERING EODT SERVICES, INC. ESE ENVIRONMENTAL, INC. GAIA RESOURCE, INC. GEO-MICROBIAL TECHNOLOGIES, INC. GROUNDWATER TECHNOLOGY, INC. IT CORPORATION KEMRON ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC. MICRO-BAG INTERNATIONAL, INC. MICROBIAL ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES (MES) OHM REMEDIATION SERVICES CORPORATION REMEDIATION TECHNOLOGIES, INC. SBP TECHNOLOGIES, INC. WASTE STREAM TECHNOLOGY, INC. YELLOWSTONE ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE, INC. BIOREMEDIATION - IN SITU LAGOON BIO-GENESIS TECHNOLOGIES ECOLOGY TECHNOLOGIES INTERNATIONAL, INC. LIMNOFK INC./GOLDER ASSOCIATES OHM REMEDIATION SERVICES CORPORATION PRAXAIR, INC. BIOREMEDIATION - IN SITU SOIL ABB ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC. BILLINGS & ASSOCIATES, INC. BIO-GENESIS TECHNOLOGIES BIOGEE INTERNATIONAL, INC. DETOX INDUSTRIES, INC. ECOLOGY.TECHNOLOGIES INTERNATIONAL, INC. ELECTROKINETICS, INC. ESE ENVIRONMENTAL, INC. GEO-MICROBIAL TECHNOLOGIES, INC. GRACE DEARBORN, INC. GROUND WATER TECHNOLOGY, INC. HAYWARD BAKER ENVIRONMENTAL, INC. IN-SITU FIXATION, INC. KEMRON ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC. MICRO-BAG INTERNATIONAL, INC. MICROBIAL ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES (MES) QUATERNARY INVESTIGATIONS, INC. SBP TECHNOLOGIES, INC. WASTE STREAM TECHNOLOGY, INC. BIOREMEDIATION - NOT OTHERWISE SPECIFIED AP TECHNOLOGIES, INC. B&S RESEARCH, INC. BEAREHAVEN RECLAMATION, INC. BIO-PRO CORP. BIOREMEDIATION SERVICE, INC. BIOREMEDIATION TECHNOLOGY SERVICES, INC. CHEMPETE, INC. CLYDE ENGINEERING SERVICE DETOX INDUSTRIES, INC. ECO-TEC, INC./ECOLOGY TECHNOLOGY ENSITE, INC. EPG BIOSERVICES INC. ETUS, INC. MICHIGAN BIOTECHNOLOGY INSTITUTE PERINO TECHNICAL SERVICES, INC. SYBRON CHEMICALS, INC. BIOREMEDIATION - SLURRY PHASE BIO SOLUTIONS, INC. BIO-GENESIS TECHNOLOGIES BIOGEE INTERNATIONAL, INC. BOGART ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC. ECOLOGY TECHNOLOGIES INTERNATIONAL, INC. EIMCO PROCESS EQUIPMENT CO. EODT SERVICES, INC. GENESIS ECO SYSTEMS, INC. GEO-MICROBIAL TECHNOLOGIES, INC. IT CORPORATION J.R. SIMPLOT COMPANY OHM REMEDIATION SERVICES CORPORATION PRAXAIR, INC. REMEDIATION TECHNOLOGIES, INC. SBP TECHNOLOGIES, INC. WASTE STREAM TECHNOLOGY, INC. YELLOWSTONE ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE, INC. YELLOWSTONE ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE, INC. BIOREMEDIATION - SOLD3 PHASE ABB ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC. ABB ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC. ABB ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC. ALVAREZ BROTHERS, INC. ARCTECH,INC. BIO-GENESIS TECHNOLOGIES BIOGEE INTERNATIONAL, INC. BIOREMEDIATION SERVICE, INC. BIOREMEDIATION SERVICE, INC. CLEAN-UP TECHNOLOGY, INC. C-l ------- EARTH TECH EARTHFAX ENGINEERING, INC. ECOLOGY TECHNOLOGIES INTERNATIONAL, INC. ENSR CONSULTING AND ENGINEERING ETUS, INC. GEO-MICROBIAL TECHNOLOGIES, INC. GRACE DEARBORN, INC. GROUNDWATER TECHNOLOGY, INC. IT CORPORATION MICROBIAL ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES (MES) MYCOTECH CORPORATION OHM REMEDIATION SERVICES CORPORATION PERINO TECHNICAL SERVICES, INC. REMEDIATION TECHNOLOGIES, INC. SBP TECHNOLOGIES. INC. WASTE STREAM TECHNOLOGY, INC. BIOVENTING ABB ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC. BATTELLE PACIFIC NORTHWEST LABORATORIES DAMES & MOORE ENGINEERING-SCIENCE, INC. ENSR CONSULTING AND ENGINEERING ENVIROGEN.INC. ENVIRONEERING H2O SCIENCE, INC. HAYWARD BAKER ENVIRONMENTAL, INC. rr CORPORATION M1TTELHAUSER CORPORATION OHM REMEDIATION SERVICES CORPORATION QUATERNARY INVESTIGATIONS, INC. TERRA VAC, INC. CHEMICAL TREATMENT - DECHLORINATION COMMODORE ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC. SDTX TECHNOLOGIES, INC. CHEMICAL TREATMENT - IN SITU GROUNDWATER ENV1ROMETAL TECHNOLOGIES, INC. GEOCHEM DIVISION OF TERRA VAC INTERA. INC. CHEMICAL TREATMENT - OTHER CLEANTECH OF ARKANSAS, INC. CORPEX TECHNOLOGIES, INC. DAVY INTERNATIONAL - ENVIRONMENTAL DIV. INTEGRATED CHEMISTRIES, INC. RMT.INC. SOLUCORP INDUSTRIES LTD. VIKING INDUSTRIES CHEMICAL TREATMENT - OXIDATION/REDUCTION ADVANCED RECOVERY SYSTEMS, INC. ARCTECH. INC. ARCTECH, INC. DELPHI RESEARCH, INC. ELI ECO LOGIC INTERNATIONAL, INC. EM&C ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES ETUS, INC. G.E.M., INC. HIGH VOLTAGE ENVIRONMENTAL APPLICATIONS IT CORPORATION FT CORPORATION MOLTEN METAL TECHNOLOGY, INC. SYNTHETICA TECHNOLOGIES, INC. TERRA VAC, INC. THERMOCHEM, INC. DELIVERY/EXTRACTION SYSTEMS DRILEX SYSTEMS, INC. EASTMAN CHERRINGTON ENVIRONMENTAL HORIZONTAL TECHNOLOGIES, INC. NOVATERRA, INC. DUAL PHASE EXTRACTION BILLINGS & ASSOCIATES, INC. DAMES & MOORE EG & G ENVIRONMENTAL, INC. FIRST ENVIRONMENT, INC. IT CORPORATION TERRA VAC, INC. ELECTRICAL SEPARATION ELECTRO-PETROLEUM, INC. ELECTROKINETICS, INC. WATER AND SLURRY PURIFICATION PROCESS ELECTRO-THERMAL GASIFICATION - IN SITU BIO-ELECTRICS, INC. MAGNETIC SEPARATION S.G. FRANTZ CO., INC. MATERIALS HANDLING/PHYSICAL SEPARATION CANONIE ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES CORP. MICROFLUIDICS CORP. ONSITE * OFSITE INC./BATTELLE PNL PORTEC, INC. RECRA ENVIRONMENTAL, INC. OFF-GAS TREATMENT BECO ENGINEERING CO. BOHN BIOFILTER CORP. ECOLOGY TECHNOLOGIES INTERNATIONAL, INC. ENVIROGEN, INC. GENERAL ATOMICS IT CORPORATION KSE, INC. MEMBRANE TECHNOLOGY & RESEARCH, INC. MICHIGAN BIOTECHNOLOGY INSTITUTE NUCON INTERNATIONAL, INC. PROCESS TECHNOLOGIES, INC. PRODUCT CONTROL PURUS, INC. THERMATRIX, INC. ZAPIT TECHNOLOGY, INC. PNEUMATIC FRACTURING ACCUTECH REMEDIAL SYSTEMS, INC. TERRA VAC, INC. PYROLYSIS BIO-ELECTRICS, INC. ENERGY RECLAMATION, INC. PLASMA ENERGY APPLIED TECHNOLOGY (PEAT) PRODUCT CONTROL VANCE IDS, INC. SLAGGING HORSEHEAD RESOURCE DEVELOPMENT CO., INC. TEXACO, INC. SOIL FLUSHING - IN SITU HORIZONTAL TECHNOLOGIES, INC. SOH, VAPOR EXTRACTION DAMES & MOORE DOW ENVIRONMENTAL, INC. C-2 ------- ENVIROGEN, INC. GEO-CON, INC. IT CORPORATION KAP & SEP A, LTD. QUATERNARY INVESTIGATIONS, INC. TERRA VAC, INC. SOIL WASHING ADVANCED RECOVERY SYSTEMS, INC. AEA TECHNOLOGY ALTERNATIVE REMEDIAL TECHNOLOGIES, INC. B&W NUCLEAR ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC. BENCHEM BERGMANN USA BIOTROL, INC. CANONIE ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES CORP. DIVESCO, INC. EARTH DECONTAMINATORS, INC. (EDI) ENSR CONSULTING AND ENGINEERING GENESIS ECO SYSTEMS, INC. GEOCHEM DIVISION OF TERRA VAC GEOCYCLE ENVIRONNEMENT, INC. HYDRIPLEX, INC. KINIT ENTERPRISES LOCKHEED CORPORATION OHM REMEDIATION SERVICES CORPORATION ON-SITE TECHNOLOGIES, INC. SANFORD COHEN AND ASSOCIATES, INC. SOIL TECHNOLOGY, INC. TECHNOLOGY SCIENTIFIC, LTD. TUBOSCOPE VETCO ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES WESTINGHOUSE REMEDIATION SERVICES, INC. SOLVENT EXTRACTION A/S PHOENIX CONTRACTORS/PHOENIX MILJOE ART INTERNATIONAL, INC. CF SYSTEMS CORPORATION DEHYDRO-TECH CORPORATION EM&C ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES ENSR CONSULTING AND ENGINEERING ENVIROGEN, INC. GEO-MICROBIAL TECHNOLOGIES, INC. INTEGRATED CHEMISTRIES, INC. NATIONAL RESEARCH COUNCIL OF CANADA RESOURCES CONSERVATION CO. SRE, INC. TERRA-KLEEN RESPONSE GROUP, INC. SURFACTANT ENHANCED RECOVERY - IN SITU ECOSITE, INC. S.S. PAPADOPULOS & ASSOCIATES, INC. SURTEK, INC. THERMAL DESORPTTON ADVANCED ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC. ADVANCED SOIL TECHNOLOGIES ARIEL INDUSTRIES, INC. BIRD ENVIRONMENTAL GULF COAST, INC. CANONIE ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES CORP. CARLO ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGIES, INC. CARSON ENVIRONMENTAL CASWAN ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES LTD. CLEAN-UP TECHNOLOGY, INC. CONTAMINATION TECHNOLOGIES, INC. CONTECK ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC. COVENANT ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGIES, INC. DBA, INC. ECOTECHNIEK B.V. ENVIRO-KLEAN SOILS, INC. ENVIRO-SOIL REMEDIATION, INC. HAZEN RESEARCH, INC. HRUBETZ ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC. IT CORPORATION IT CORPORATION KALKASKA CONSTRUCTION SERVICE, INC. MAXYMILLIAN TECHNOLOGIES, INC. MERCURY RECOVERY SERVICES, INC. MIDWEST SOIL REMEDIATION, INC. O'BRIEN & GERE TECHNICAL SERVICES, INC. PET-CON SOIL REMEDIATION, INC. PHILIP ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES CORP. PRODUCTCONTROL RECYCLING SCIENCE INTERNATIONAL, INC. REMEDIATION TECHNOLOGIES, INC. REMTECH, INC. ROY F. WESTON, INC. RUST INTERNATIONAL, INC. SEAVIEW THERMAL SYSTEMS SEPARATION AND RECOVERY SYSTEMS, INC. SOIL REMEDIATION OF PHILADELPHIA, INC. SOILTECH ATP SYSTEMS, INC. SOUTHWEST SOIL REMEDIATION, INC. SPI/ASTEC TEXAROME, INC. THERMOTECH SYSTEMS CORPORATION TPS TECHNOLOGIES, INC. WESTERN RESEARCH INSTITUTE WESTINGHOUSE REMEDIATION SERVICES, INC. THERMALLY ENHANCED RECOVERY - IN SITU BATTELLE PACIFIC NORTHWEST LABORATORIES BIO-ELECTRICS, INC. EM&C ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES EM&C ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES HRUBETZ ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC. IIT RESEARCH INSTITUTE KAI TECHNOLOGIES, INC. NOVATERRA, INC. PRAXIS ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGIES, INC. R.E. WRIGHT ENVIRONMENTAL, INC. (REWEI) SIVE SERVICES THERMATRK, INC. VITRIFICATION B&W NUCLEAR ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC. BATTELLE PACIFIC NORTHWEST LABORATORIES BIO-ELECTRICS, INC. ECOTECHNIEK B.V. EET CORPORATION ELECTRO-PYROLYSIS, INC. EM&C ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES GEOSAFE CORPORATION MULTIPLEX XTALTITE-TEXILLA ENVIRONMENTAL RETECH, DIV. OF LOCKHEED ENV. SYS.&TECH. SELLER POLLUTION CONTROL SYSTEMS, INC. STIR-MELTER, INC.(SUBSID/GLASSTECH,INC.) VORTEC CORPORATION WASTE DESTRUCTION TECHNOLOGIES, INC. C-3 ------- ------- |