vvEPA
United States
Environmental Protection
Agency
Solid Waste and
Emergency Response
(5102W)
EPA 542-R-96-002
March 1996
Vendor Information Form
(VIF) 5.0
To be completed for participation in the
Vendor Information System
for Innovative Treatment
Technologies (VISITT)
Version 5.0
Note: Instead of submitting this form, you may provide information on your
technology(ies) electronically. You can obtain the electronic VIF by
electronic mail or download it from EPA's CLU-IN bulletin board system.
You also can call the VISITT help line to request a 3.5" IBM-compatible
diskette. See Section V, page ii for details.
Completion of this form is voluntary. If you have any questions, call the
VISITT Help Line at 800/2454505 or 703/287-8927.
Primed on Recycled Paper
-------
THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
-------
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Section
GENERAL INFORMATION
I. What is VISITT?
II. What Innovative Technologies are
Eligible for Inclusion?
III. Should Confidential Business Information (CBI)
be Submitted? ......
IV. Submittal of Process Flow Diagram or Schematic ................... ii
V. Electronic Submittal of Vendor
Information Form ....................................... u
VI. When and Where to File ................................... ii
VII. EPA's Authority for Submittal and Burden Statement ................ in
VIII. Vendor Information Form ................................... 1
Part 1: General Information and Technology Overview ................ 1
Part 2: Full-Scale Equipment/Capabilities ........................ U
Part 3: Pilot-Scale Equipment/Capabilities ....................... 14
Part 4: Treatability Study Capabilities (Bench Scale) ................. 16
Part 5: Representative Applications, Client References,
and Performance Data ............................... 17
Part 6: Literature and Technical References ...................... 27
Appendices
A BUSINESS CLASSIFICATION INFORMATION ......................... A-l
B KEY TO CONTAMINANT GROUPS ................................ B-l
C LIST OF VISITT 4.0 VENDORS BY TECHNOLOGY ..................... C-l
-------
GENERAL INFORMATION
I. What is VISTIT?
Vendor Information System for Innovative Treatment Technologies (VISITT) is a service offered
by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) Technology Innovation Office (TIO) to
promote the use of certain categories of innovative technologies for the treatment of contaminated
ground water and soil. Version 4.0, which was released in August 1995, contains 325
technologies provided by 204 vendors. The goal of the database is to foster communication
between technology vendors and users by providing information on the availability, performance,
and cost associated with the application of treatment technologies. VISITT is intended to inform
federal, state, and private-sector remediation professionals of their cleanup options and the
capabilities of firms to provide innovative remediation services.
II. What Innovative Technologies are Eligible for Inclusion?
Eligible technologies are those that are:
A. Innovative, that is, technologies that lack cost and performance data and are not
commonly applied when their use can provide better, more cost-effective
performance than conventional methods
B. Designed to treat contaminated soil, sludge, sediments, solid-matrix and to treat
groundwater or non-aqueous phase liquids (NAPL) in situ. Technologies that
treat groundwater ex situ, incineration, and solidification/stabilization are not
eligible.
PARTIAL LIST OF INNOVATIVE TREATMENT TECHNOLOGIES OF INTEREST
Acid Extraction
Adsorption - In Situ
Air Sparging - In Situ Ground Water
Bioremediation - In Situ Ground Water
Bioremediation - In Situ Lagoon
Bioremediation - In Situ Soil
Bioremediation - Not Otherwise Specified
Bioremediation - Slurry Phase
Bioremediation - Solid Phase
Bioventing
Chemical Treatment - Dechlorination
Chemical Treatment - In Situ Ground Water
Chemical Treatment - Other
Chemical Treatment - Oxidation/Reduction
Delivery/Extraction Systems
Dual-Phase Extraction
Electrical Separation
Electro - Thermal Gasification - In Situ
Magnetic Separation
Materials Handling/Physical Separation
Off-Gas Treatment
Pneumatic Fracturing
Pyrolysis
Slagging - Off-Gas Treated
Soil Flushing - In Situ
Soil Vapor Extraction
Soil Washing
Solvent Extraction
Surfactant Enhanced Recovery - In Situ
Thermal Desorption
Thermally Enhanced Recovery - In Situ
Vitrification
-------
Suppliers of separate components of a treatment technology (such as bacteria for bioremediation)
will not be listed in the database. EPA will determine whether a technology is eligible for
inclusion, if so requested by the vendor. Questions about eligibility of technologies can be
directed to the VISIT! help line at 800-245-4505 or 703-287-8927. Some of the eligible
technologies, as included in VISITT 4.0, are listed on the previous page.
III. Should Confidential Business Information be Submitted?
Submittal of technology information for participation in VISITT is voluntary, and submittals
should not include confidential business information. EPA considers information in the database
public information, and if so requested, will release all such information. However, if a vendor
wishes to provide general information on confidential projects to highlight business experience,
the vendor may elect to use generic descriptions (for example, "organic chemical manufacturer").
IV. Submittal of Process Flow Diagram or Schematic
Please provide a flow chart or schematic of the treatment process, showing the equipment
necessary for each step. To ensure that schematics are legible in the final system, EPA
recommends that schematics be submitted in a Bitmap (BMP), Tag Image File (TIP) or PCX
electronic format. If an electronic copy is not available, a camera-ready hard copy suitable for
computer scanning can be submitted.
V. Electronic Submittal of Vendor Information Form
Instead of submitting this form, you may provide information on your technology(ies)
electronically. To do so, you can download an electronic version of the VISITT Vendor
Information Form (VIF) from EPA's Cleanup Information (CLU-IN) Bulletin Board System
(BBS) at (301) 589-8366, or you can obtain the VIF by electronic mail (send requests to
cassidt@prcemi.com). You also can obtain the electronic version on a 3.5" IBM-compatible
diskette by calling the VISITT help line at 800-245-4505 (DOS 3.3 or higher is needed to operate
the software). For electronic submittals, a diskette containing the completed VIF, along with a
hard copy printout of the completed form, should be mailed to the address below.
VI. When and Where to File
Submittal deadline is June 30, 1996 for inclusion in VISITT 5.0, which is scheduled for release
in November 1996. Submittals received after the deadline will be reviewed as time and resources
permit.
Send completed VIFs or diskettes to:
System Operator, VISITT
PRC Environmental Management, Inc.
1593 Spring Hill Road, Suite 300
Vienna, VA 22182
Electronic submittals should be compressed and e-mailed to cassidt@prcemi.com.
-------
VII. EPA's Authority for Submitted and Burden Statement
EPA's authority for conducting this fifth Invitation for Submittal is set forth under section 311
of the Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization Act of 1986 (42 U.S.C. 9601 et seq.). Under
section 311, EPA may collect and disseminate information related to the use of innovative
treatment technologies for remediation of hazardous waste sites.
EPA estimates that the vendor reporting burden for this collection of information will average
25 hours per respondent for one original submittal, and 13 hours per respondent for an updated
submittal These estimates include the time applicants will require to review and maintain the
data needed and to complete and review the VIF. Send comments regarding this estimate of
burden or any other aspect of reducing the burden, to Chief, Information Policy Branch, PM-
2^3 US EPA, 401 M Street, SW, Washington, DC 20460; and to Paperwork Reduction Project
(OMB#2050-6ll4), Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Office of Management and
Budget, Washington, DC 20503.
in
-------
THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
-------
VENDOR INFORMATION FORM
PART 1: GENERAL INFORMATION AND TECHNOLOGY OVERVIEW
1. Date Submitted / /
2a. Developer/Vendor Name .
2b. Is this an update of a technology listed in VISITT Version 4.0 ? Yes Q No LJ
If yes, specify technology and vendor name that appeared in VISITT 4.0 if different from the
information in this update.
For VISITT Version 4.0 Vendors: Questions 2c and 2d are intended to gather information on the
use of VISITT in the remediation community.
2c. Please provide a ro.ugh estimate of the total number or frequency of inquiries your company
has received through your inclusion in VISITT. _
2d. Has your company performed work (either for a fee or free), such as a treatability study,
pilot-scale study, or field demonstration, as a result of those inquiries. LJ Yes LJ No
Please provide details, if possible.
2e. Please list your primary Standard Industrial Classification (SIC) code and check the appropriate
business classification for each code. Refer to Appendix A-1 for business classification
definitions.
SIC code.
SIC code
Q Small Q Other Than Small Q Disadvantaged/Minority Q Women-owned
Q Small Q Other Than Small Q Disadvantaged/Minority Q Women-owned
3. Street Address
4. City
5. Country
6. a. Contact Name(s) _
b. Contact Title(s)
7. Contact Phone ( )_
9. E-mail Address
State/Province
Zip Code
ext.
8. Fax Number ( )_
10. Home Page Address
-------
Vendor Name
Technology Type
PART 1: GENERAL INFORMATION AND TECHNOLOGY OVERVIEW (continued)
11. Technology Type. Check one only. Fill out a separate form for each additional technology.
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
Acid Extraction
Adsorption - In Situ
Air Sparging - In
Situ Ground Water
Bioremediation - in
Situ Ground Water
Bioremediation - In
Situ Lagoon
Bioremediation - In
Situ Soil
Bioremediation -
Not Otherwise
Specified
Bioremediation -
Slurry Phase
Bioremediation -
Solid Phase
Bioventinq
Q
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
Chemical Treatment -
Dechlorination
Chemical Treatment - In
Situ Ground Water
Chemical Treatment -
Other
Chemical Treatment -
Oxidation/Reduction
Delivery/Extraction
Systems
Dual-Phase Extraction
Electrical Separation
Electro-Thermal
Gasification - In Situ
Magnetic Separation
Materials
Handling/Physical
Separation
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
Off-Gas Treatment
Pneumatic Fracturing
Pyrolysis
Slagging - Off-Gas
Treated
Soil Flushing - In Situ
Soil Vapor Extraction
Soil Washing
Solvent Extraction
Surfactant Enhanced
Recovery - In Situ
Thermal Desorption
Thermally Enhanced
Recovery - In Situ
Vitrification - General
Other (specify)
12a. Technology Name Assigned By Vendor (if different than name listed in Question 11).
12b. Registered trademark? Q Yes Q No
12c. Does the vendor hold an exclusive license? Q Yes Q No
13. Patents
a. Is technology patented? Q Yes Q No
b. Is patent pending? Q Yes Q NO
14. Superfund Innovative Technology Evaluation (SITE) Program.
a. Is this technology being tested, or has this technology been tested, in EPA SITE Emerging Technology Program?
Q Yes Q No
b. Is this technology being tested, or has this technology been tested, in EPA SITE Demonstration Program?
Q Yes Q No
-------
Vendor Name
Technology Type
PART 1: GENERAL INFORMATION AND TECHNOLOGY OVERVIEW (continued)
15. Description of Technology. In 300 words or less, describe the treatment process, including
scientific principles on which the technology is based; key treatment steps; unique and innovative
features; whether full-scale system is/will be batch, continuous, or semicontinuous; and whether
the technology is above ground or in situ. Parts 2 and 3 allow more detail for full- and pilot-scale
systems. Provide a flow chart or schematic of the treatment process, showing the equipment
necessary for each step. To ensure the schematics are legible in the final system, EPA
recommends that schematics be submitted in a Bitmap (BMP), Tag Image File (TIF) or PCX
electronic format. If an electronic copy is not available, a camera-ready hard copy suitable for
computer scanning can be submitted as an alternative.
EXAMPLE
Description of Technology
ABC Corporation has developed an innovative solvent extraction technology (SUPER) that uses Super Chemical as
the solvent. Super Chemical is a biodegradable solvent.
The key to success of this process is Super Chemical's property of inverse miscibility; below 65 degrees F, Super
Chemical is soluble in water (hydrophilic) and above 65 degrees F, it is insoluble in water (hydrophobia). Therefore,
cold Super Chemical can extract water and water-soluble compounds, and warm Super Chemical can extract
organic contaminants, such as PCBs, pesticides, PAHs, SVOCs, and VOCs.
Within the unit, the soil is washed continuously with Super Chemical in a counter-current process. The
contaminants dissolve in the solution and are removed from the soil by the counter-current flow. The contaminated
solvents are reclaimed in a closed-loop circuit, eliminating the need for large volumes of solvent. The clean, washed
soil is moved to a closed-loop dryer system, where any excess solvent is removed from the soft. When the soil
exits the system, it is relatively free of organics and dry. The collected contaminant from the solvent washing is
concentrated 1,000 to 10,000 times, reducing its volume and its associated disposal costs, and is pumped
periodically from the system into labeled 55-gallon drums for conventional off-site disposal.
Emissions of organic vapors to air are controlled and treated by a carbon absorption system.
-------
Vendor Name
Technology Type
PART 1: GENERAL INFORMATION AND TECHNOLOGY OVERVIEW (continued)
15. Description of Technology (continued).
-------
Vendor Name
Technology Type
PART 1: GENERAL INFORMATION AND TECHNOLOGY OVERVIEW (continued)
16. Technology Highlights. In 200 words or less, describe the technology in terms of contaminants
treated, performance, implementation, or cost. Include the key marketable features of the
technology, such as treatment niche and advantages over other technologies.
EXAMPLE
Technology Highlights
The SUPER solvent extraction process can treat soils, sludges, and sediments contaminated with PCBs,
carcinogenic PAHs, pesticides, and VOCs at 20% to 40% of incineration costs. Treated products from the
SUPER process include: water suitable for discharge, oil for recycle as fuel, and solids that can be returned to
the site as backfill. The process also can reduce the initial volume of contaminated material by as much as
90%.
The SUPER solvent extraction process operates at near ambient pressures and temperatures, uses off-the-shelf
process equipment, and controls air emissions. The extraction efficiency (organic removal efficiency) achieved
is as high as 99%.
Solvent recovery is also greater than 99%. The process can treat up to 300 tons per day of contaminated soil.
This technology is well accepted by communities because air emissions are minimized.
-------
Vendor Name
Technology Type
PART 1: GENERAL INFORMATION AND TECHNOLOGY OVERVIEW (continued)
17. Technical Limitations. In 200 words or less, describe the technical limitations such as specific
contaminants or contaminant combinations, temperature, moisture content, or chemical properties
of the contaminant, that could adversely affect applicability or performance.
EXAMPLE
Technology Limitations
The SUPER process is not applicable for metal-only, (e.g., radioactive) or other inorganic wastes, but its
performance is not affected by inorganics at low concentrations. This process may require screening or
crushing to 0.25 inch, and other feed preparation operations, depending on the waste. The extraction efficiency
of an organic contaminant will depend on its solubility in the solvent. The solvent used is best suited for PCBs
and pesticides.
-------
Vendor Name
Technology Type
PART 1: GENERAL INFORMATION AND TECHNOLOGY OVERVIEW (continued)
18. Other Comments. In 200 words or less, provide additional information about the technology, such
as its history, status, capabilities, and experience and applicable permits obtained (for example,
TSCA or RCRA). Also describe plans for future development of the technology, including
diversification of media and/or contaminants treated.
EXAMPLE
Other Comments
The SUPER process has been demonstrated successfully at bench scale, pilot scale, and full scale. A full-scale
SUPER unit was used to treat sludges contaminated with PCBs at the BAD Oil Refinfng Superfund site.
Two pilot-scale units have been built. One was operated under the SITE program to treat soils and sludges
contaminated with PCBs.
Bench-scale treatability studies have been conducted on contaminated soils containing petrochemical
compounds, pharmaceutical compounds, pesticides, PCBs, and wood preserving wastes containing PAHs.
-------
Vendor Name
Technology Type
PART 1: GENERAL INFORMATION AND TECHNOLOGY OVERVIEW (continued)
19. Technology Scale. Check only one.
status of the technology.
Using the following definitions, indicate the operational
a. I I Full scale. Available equipment is sized and commercially available for actual site remediation. (If you select full
scale, you must fill out Pan 2).
b. l_l Pilot scale. Available equipment is of sufficient size to verify technology feasibility or establish the design and
operating conditions for a full-scale system. However, it is not of the size typically used for a cleanup. (If you
select pilot scale, you must fill out Part 3).
c. L_l Bench scale or emerging. Technology has been shown to be feasible through the use of bench-top equipment in
the laboratory. Data from these studies cannot be used to scale up the technology to full scale.
20. Media treated. Check "actual" for all media that have been treated by your technology. Check
"potential" for all media to which the technology may be applied in the future.
Soil (in situ)
Soil (ex situ)
Sludge (does not include municipal sewage sludge)
Solid (for example, slag)
Natural sediment (in situ)
Natural sediment (ex situ)
Ground water (in situ) [Includes treatment of ground water and/or saturated soil]
Off-gas generated from a primary innovative treatment technology
Dense nonziqueous phase liquids (DNAPL) [in situ]
Light nonaqueous phase liquids (LNAPL) [in situ]
Actual
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
Potential
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
21. Contaminants and Contaminant Groups Treated. Check all that may apply. Check "actual" for
all that have been treated by your technology (that is, data exist). Check "potential" for all that
the technology may be applied to in the future. Data for actual contaminants treated should be
included in Part 5 (see Appendix B for key to contaminant groups). If your technology is
materials handling/physical separation, delivery/extraction, or if you are an equipment vendor,
this question may not apply.
Actual Potential
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
Halogenated volatiUss
Halogenated semivolatiles
Nonhalogenated volatiles
Nonhalogenated semivolatiles
Organic pesticides/herbicides
Dioxins/furans
PCBs
Polynuclear aromatics (PNA)
Solvents
Benzene-toluene-ethylbenzene-
xylene (BTEX)
Acetonitrile (organic cyanide)
Organic acids
Actual Potential
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
Heavy metals
Nonmetallic toxic elements
Radioactive metals
Asbestos
Inorganic cyanides
Inorganic corrosives
Miscellaneous
L_l LJ Explosives/propellants
L_l LJ Organometallic pesticides/herbicides
Q Q Other
(specify)
-------
Vendor Name
Technology Type
PART 1: GENERAL INFORMATION AND TECHNOLOGY OVERVIEW (continued)
22. Industrial Waste Sources or Site Types of Sites Treated. Check all that may apply. Check
"actual" for all that have been treated by your technology (that is, data exist). Check
"potential" for all that the technology may be applied to in the future. Treatment data should
be available for those sites for which "actual" is checked. See Table A for wastes typically
associated with each industry.
Actual Potential
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
I—I Agriculture
LJ Battery recycling/disposal
LJ Chloro-alkali manufacturing
Coal gasification
Dry cleaning
Electroplating
I I Gasoline service
station/petroleum storage facility
LJ Herbicide manufacturing/use
O Industrial landfills
L_l Inorganic/organic pigments
I I Machine shops
I I Metal ore mining and smelting
LJ Municipal landfill
Actual Potential
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
Munitions manufacturing
Paint/ink formulation
Pesticide manufacturing/use
LJ Petroleum refining and reuse
LJ Photographic products
Plastics manufacturing
Pulp and paper industry
LJ Other organic chemical manufacturing
LJ Other inorganic chemical manufacturing
LJ Semiconductor manufacturing
LJ Rubber manufacturing
LJ Wood preserving
LJ Uranium mining
a
a
a a
Others (specify)
23. Vendor Services. Check all that apply.
LJ Equipment manufacturer
LJ Subcontractor for cleanup services
LJ Prime contractor for full-service remediation
LJ Other (specify) .
-------
Vendor Name
Technology Type
PART 1: GENERAL INFORMATION AND TECHNOLOGY OVERVIEW (continued)
Table A ~
Contaminants/Wastes Associated With Industrial Waste
Sources or Types of Sites
1. Agriculture
2. Battery recycling/disposal
3. Chloro-alkali manufacturing
4. Coal gasification
5. Dry cleaning
6. Electroplating
7. Herbicide manufacturing/use
8. Industrial landfills
9. Inorganic/organic pigments
10. Machine shops
11. Metal ore mining and smelting
12. Municipal landfills
13. Munitions manufacturing
14. Paint/ink formulation
15. Pesticide manufacturing/use
16. Petroleum refining and reuse
17. Photographic products
18. Plastics manufacturing
19. Pulp and paper industry
20. Other organic chemical manufacturing
21. Other inorganic chemical manufacturing
22. Semiconductor manufacturing
23. Rubber manufacturing
24. Wood preserving
25. Uranium mining
Pesticides
Lead (acid)
Chlorine compounds, mercury
PAHs
Solvents
Chrome, metals
Pesticides
Wastes from Multiple Sources
Solvents, chrome, zinc
Metals, oils
Metals
Wastes from multiple sources
Explosives, lead
Solvents, some metals (chrome, zinc)
Pesticides
Petroleum, hydrocarbons, BTEX
Silver, bromide, solvent
Polymers, phthalates
Chlorinated organics, dioxins
Organics, metals (used as catalyst)
: Inorganics, metals
Degreasing agents (solvents), metals
Rubber, plastics, polymers, organics
Creosote, PCP, arsenic, chrome, PAHs
Uranium, radioactive metals
LO
-------
Vendor Name
Technology Type
PART 2: FULL-SCALE EQUIPMENT/CAPABILITIES
You must complete this part if you checked Response 17a (that is, technology is at full scale).
You also may complete this part if the technology is at pilot scale.
24. Major Unit Processes. In 300 words or less, describe the steps and operation of the full-scale
system, including list of key components. Also describe any pre- and post-processing required
by your technology. Provide more detail than you did in Question 13.
EXAMPLE
Major Unit Processes
Preprocessing
• Front-end loader and weight scale
• Shredder
• Radial stacker belt conveyor and surge hopper
1. StockpHed soil is transported to a weigh scale by a front-end loader.
2. Soil is deposited directly on a power shredding device. Classified soil with a top size
of less than 2 inches passes through the shredder into the feed conveyor.
3. The feed conveyor is an enclosed radial stacker belt conveyor that is 18 inches wide
and 60 feet long. The conveyor discharges into the surge hopper located above the
thermal processor. The soil is fed into the LT system at regular intervals to maintain
the surge hopper seal.
Processing
• Thermal processor
• Induced draft (ID) fan for vapors
• Horizontal screw conveyor and ash conditioner
1. The thermal processor houses four intermeshed screw conveyors. The function of
each screw conveyor is to move soil forward through the processor and to
thoroughly mix the material, providing indirect contact between the heat transfer
fluid and the soil. The shafts and flights of the screw conveyors and the processor
jackets are hollow to allow circulation of a heat transfer fluid (that is, hot oil).
2. Vapors are driven off the soil and are drawn out of the thermal processor by an ID
fan.
3. Soil is discharged from the thermal processor onto a horizontal screw conveyor and
then an ash conditioner.
4. The conditioner is a ribbon flight screw conveyor. Water spray nozzles installed in
the conditioner housing cool the discharge material and minimize fugitive dust
emissions.
Postprocessing
• Stacker belt conveyor and dump truck
1. The conditioner discharges onto an inclined stacker belt. The stacker belt conveys
the wetted processed soil from the conditioner to the dump truck.
11
-------
Vendor Name
Technology Type
PART 2: FULL-SCALE EQUIPMENT/CAPABILITIES (continued)
24. Major Unit Processes (continued).
12
-------
Vendor Name
Technology Type
PART 2: FULL-SCALE EQUIPMENT/CAPABILITIES (continued)
25. Full-Scale Facility is (check one only)
Q Transportable LJ Fixed LJ In situ
D> City and State of fixed facility
26. Number of Full-Scale Systems.
Planned/in design Under construction Constructed
Projected completion Projected completion
dates dates
27. Capacity Range.
to (units) Q Not applicable
28. Estimated Price Range. Provide a "ballpark" estimate per unit of waste treated. Include waste
preprocessing and exclude excavation, permitting, and disposal of residues.
$ to $ per (units)
29. Factors Affecting Unit Price. With "1" the highest, rank any of the following items that will
have a significant effect on the unit price. If the technology is in situ, excavation, and waste
handling cannot affect price.
Initial concentration of contaminant Site preparation
Target concentration of contaminant Waste handling/preprocessing
Amount of debris with waste
Quantity of waste Characteristics of soil (classification,
Depth of contamination permeability)
Depth to ground water Utility/fuel rates
Characteristics of residual waste Labor rates
Moisture content of soil
Other (specify) .
30. Full-Scale Cleanups.
a. If you are a subcontractor or prime contractor, give the number of full-scale cleanups using
your technology that your firm has initiated or completed. Consider only those applications
of your technology that were applied at petroleum/hazardous waste sites.
b. If you are an equipment manufacturer, give the number of full-scale cleanups by other firms
using your technology of which you are aware. Consider only those applications of your
technology that were applied at petroleum/hazardous waste sites.
13
-------
Vendor Name
Technology Type
PART 3: PILOT-SCALE EQUIPMENT/CAPABILITIES
You must complete this part if you checked Response Question 17b. You also may complete
this part if the technology is at full scale or bench scale.
31 ' etmen68', " T ^ ^ ^^ *" St6pS 3nd °peration of the P«ot-scale
treatment system, mcludmg a list of the key components. Also describe any pre- and post-
processing required by your technology. Provide more detail than you did in Question 13.
EXAMPLE
Major Unft Processes
Pilot-scale testing involves processing the soils or hulk soils through various operations of reduced-size equipment
that when set m ser.es, would be similar to a fulf-scafe operation. The equipment consists of:
1 . A hopper and screen for feed preparation; removal of tramp material and sizing, if needed.
2. A mixing or attrition tank where the prepared feed is introduced to the liquids. In the most basic system
extraction of contaminant takes place at this stage.
3. A classification circuit, consisting of a sump, pump, and cyclone for separation of coarse sand gravet and
organics from fine ctays and sifts.
4. If extraction of contaminant so requires, coarse material is subjected to a specific gravity (SG) separation
through use of a vessel, cyclone, or hydrosizer. Contaminated smaller size mateffal (low SG) is separated from
tne clean, coarse (high SG) material.
* SCree"' aWl°U9h in fuff-sc^e operation, additional dryers (centrffuges)
6. Low SG organics containing contaminant are dewatered with a screen and colfected for disposal or secondary
TfG STmstT.
7. Clays and silts are flocculated in a reaction tank and gravity-concentrated m a thickener or ctarifier.
*' slcfnda^ processing S'ltS C°"tafnlnB contaminant are ^watered in a belt press and sent for disposal or
dewaterins process is callected 3n* in some —
14
-------
Vendor Name
Technology Type
PART 3: PILOT-SCALE EQUIPMENT/CAPABILITIES (continued)
31. Major Unit Processes (continued).
32. Pilot-Scale Facility is (Check only one)
LJ Transportable LJ Fixed
b. City and State
In Situ
of fixed facility.
33. Number of Pilot-Scale Systems
Planned/in design
Under construction
Constructed
34. How many times have you used this technology at your facility or at other locations to
conduct pilot-scale studies on actual wastes? Count only once multiple studies pertaining to
the same site, regardless of the number of different wastes or tests. Do not count tests on
surrogate wastes.
35. Can you conduct pilot-scale treatability studies on some types of waste at your location?
D Yes Q No At a contaminated site? Q Yes Q No
36. Capacity Range. Prorate capacity of batch processes. This range should be consistent with
your answer to Question 35 (the waste requirement for the pilot-scale treatability study).
to
(units) Q Not applicable
37. Quantity of Waste Needed for Pilot-Scale Treatability Study. Give the estimated range of
quantity of waste needed to test, at the pilot scale, the feasibility of this technology on a
specific waste.
to
(units)
15
-------
Vendor Name
Technology Type
PART 4: TREATABILITY STUDY CAPABILITIES (BENCH SCALE)
38. Can you conduct bench-scale treatabiiity studies on some types of waste at your location?
Q Yes Q No
39. Number of Bench-Scale Studies Conducted. Estimate total number of bench-scale studies
conducted on actual waste from different sources or sites. Count only once multiple studies
pertaining to the same site, regardless of the number of different wastes or tests. Do not
count tests on surrogate wastes.
40. Description of Bench-Scale Testing Procedures. In 200 words or less, describe the type of
test that would be performed to determine feasibility of this technology for treating a specific
waste.
EXAMPLE
Description of Bench-Scale Testing Procedures
In our feasibility assessment tests, we> usually start with a sample of the soil to be treated and a knowledge of the
nature and of each contaminant concentration and the effluent goafs to be met. The following steps then are
taken:
a. The optimal conditions for soil washing are studied, such as pH, time, and chefating agent and concentration.
b. Various lifcely adsorbents are studied on a batch basis to determine which are most effective at removing the
metals of interest from the chelaling agent in the washing water.
c. One or more selected media than are studied on columns to determine their ability to retain metals in a
continuous-flow situation..
d. For the surviving adsorbent(s), the ion elution performance then is determined; after this step, one resin will
have been selected as optimal for the particular task under study.
e. The selected adsorbent then is isufajected to a number of charge and regeneration cycles to establish its
ruggedness.
16
-------
v cnuor iodine
Technology Type
PART 5: REPRESENTATIVE APPLICATIONS, CLIENT REFERENCES, AND PERFORMANCE DATA
41. List as many as five representative projects that also can serve as references. List information
for only one project per sheet. For projects that have more than one application, fill out a
separate sheet for each application. Provide only the performance data that is specific to each
project listed. Full- and pilot-scale projects are of most importance. EPA reserves the right to
add information on projects conducted for the federal government of which EPA is aware.
Site Name or Industry Type if Client
ntity Is Confidential:
Sito Type or Waste Source (Check all that apply)
Agriculture
Battery recycling/disposal
Chloro-alkali
manufacturing
Coal gasification
Dry cleaning
Electroplating
Gasoline service
station/petroleum storage
facility
Herbicide
manufacturing/use
Industrial landfills
Inorganic/organic pigments
Machine shops
Metal ore mining and smelting
Municipal Landfill
Munitions Manufacturing
Paint/ink formulation
Pesticide manufacturing/use
Petroleum refining and reuse
Photographic products
Plastics manufacturing
Pulp and paper industry
Other organic chemical
manufacturing
Other inorganic chemical
manufacturing
Semiconductor manufacturing
Rubber manufacturing
Wood preserving
Uranium mining
Others (specify)
.ocation
City
State/Province:
Country
Project took place at site named
Yes
No
At another site (that is, a Test facility)
Yes
No
Regulation/Statute/Organization
(Check all that apply)
Application or Project Type (Check all that apply)
RCRA corrective action
CERCLA
TSCA
Safe Drinking Water Act
UST corrective action
State (specify)
DOD
DOE
Other (Specify)
Full-scale cleanup
Field demonstration
Pilot-scale treatability study
Bench-scale treatability study
RCRA Research, Development,
and Demonstration
TSCA National Demonstration
TSCA Research and Development
EPA SITE Demonstration Program
EPA SITE Emerging
Technology Program
Research
Other Ispecify)
Media Treated (Check all that apply)
Not Applicable
Soil (in situ)
Soil (ex situ)
Sludge
Solid
Natural sediment (in situ)
Natural sediment (ex situ)
Ground water in situ
Off-gas from a primary
treatment technology
Dense nonaqueous phase
liquids (DNAPU [in situ]
Light nonaqueous phase
liquids (LNAPL) [in situ]
Other:
Volume/Quantity Treated
Equipment Scale (Check one only)
(Units)
Area treated (for in situ projects)
(Units)
Depth treated (for in situ projects)
(Units)
Bench
Pilot
Full
Project Status
Contracted
Month
In cleanup Yes
Completed
Month
_Year
No
Year
17
-------
Technology Type
PART 5: REPRESENTATIVE APPLICATIONS, CLIENT REFERENCES, AND PERFORMANCE DATA
(continued)
a. (continued)
Note: (1)
List one specific contaminant per line. Do not list such entire contaminant groups as VOCs or solvents.
TPH, which can be anailyzed using a specific test method, can be listed as an individual contaminant.
(2) and (3) Indicate the appropriate units; for concentrations that were non-detect write N.D.; treated
concentration should be lower than untreated concentration unless the technology is dewatering or
some other volume reduction method. If a concentration range cannot be given, provide an average
and note it as such.
(4) Specify the cleanup standard or goal, if known, for the individual contaminant for this project. For
example, if the project was part of a Superfund remedial action, the cleanup goal is specified in the
record of decision (ROD) for that site.
Performance Data
(1)
Contaminant or Pollutant
Parameter
(Example) Benzene
(2)
Untreated
Concentration Range
(Min to Max)
50-150
(3)
Units
mg/kg
(2)
Treated
Concentration Range
(Min to Max)
25-50
(3)
Units
mg/kg
(4)
Cleanup Standard
or Goal
50
(3)
Units
mg/kg
Comments on Performance Data
Cost Information
Estimated or actual total and/or unit cost for this
project
$ per (unit)
$ (total)
What items or activities are included in these cost(s) (e.g., mobilization,
demobilization, excavation, waste handling)?
Person outside of company familiar with project (optional)
Name Company
Address
Phone
Is Literature Available on this Project? (You may
wish to include these citations in Part 6)
Yes No
Additional project information site conditions, mode of operation, and other pertinent information
.
18
-------
Vendor Name
Technology Type
PART 5: REPRESENTATIVE APPLICATIONS, CLIENT REFERENCES, AND PERFORMANCE DATA
(continued)
b.
Sit* Namo or Industry Typ« H CSarrt
Sita Typo or Waste Source (Chack all that apply)
Agriculture
Battery recycling/disposal
Chloro-alkali manufacturing
Coal gasification
Dry cleaning
Electroplating
Gasoline service
station/petroleum storage
facility
Herbicide manufacturing/use
Industrial landfills
Inorganic/organic pigments
Location
City
State/Province:
Country
Ragulntion/'Statuta/Organization
(Check all that apply)
RCRA corrective action
CERCLA
TSCA
Safe Drinking Water
Act
UST corrective action
State Ispecifvl
DOD
DOE
Other (Specify)
Not Applicable
Volu m of Quantity Treated
(Units)
Araa treated (for in situ projects)
(Units)
Depth treated (for in situ projects)
(Units)
Machine shops Other inorganic chemical
Metal ore mining and smelting
Municipal Landfill
Munitions Manufacturing
Paint/ink formulation
manufacturing
Semiconductor
manufacturing
Rubber manufacturing
Pesticide manufacturing/use Wood preserving
Petroleum refining and reuse Uranium mining
Photographic products
Plastics manufacturing
Pulp and paper industry
Other organic chemical
Others (specify)
manufacturing
Project took place at site named
Yes
No
At another site (that is, a Test facility)
Yes
No
Application or Project Type (Check all that apply)
Full-scale cleanup EPA SITE Emerging
Field demonstration
Pilot-scale treatability study
Technology Program
Research
Bench-scale treatability study Other (soecirvl
RCRA Research, Development,
and Demonstration
TSCA National Demonstration
TSCA Research and Development
EPA SITE Demonstration Program
Media Treated (Check all that apply)
Soil (in situ) Off-gas from a primary
Soil (ex situ)
Sludge
Solid
Natural sediment (in situ)
Natural sediment (ex situ)
Ground water in situ
treatment technology
Dense nonaqueous phase
liquids (DNAPL) (in situ]
Light nonaqueous phase
liquids (LNAPL) [in situ]
Other:
Equipment Scale (Check one only!
Bench
Pilot
Full
Project Status
Contracted
Month Year
In cleanup Yes No
Completed
Month Year
19
-------
vendor name
Technology Type
PART 5: REPRESENTATIVE APPLICATIONS, CLIENT REFERENCES, AND PERFORMANCE DATA
(continued)
b. (continued)
Note: (1)
List one specific contaminant per line. Do not list such entire contaminant groups as VOCs or solvents.
TPH, which can be analyzed using a specific test method, can be listed as an individual contaminant.
(2) and (3) Indicate the appropriate units; for concentrations that were non-detect write N.D.; treated
concentration should be lower than untreated concentration unless the technology is dewatering or
some other volume reduction method. If a concentration range cannot be given, provide an average
and note it as such.
(4) Specify the cleanup standard or goal, if known, for the individual contaminant for this project. For
example, if the project was part of a Superfund remedial action, the cleanup goal is specified in the
record of decision (ROD) for that site.
Performance Data
(1)
Contaminant or Pollutant
Parameter
(Example) Benzene
Comments on Performanc
(2)
Untreated
Concentration Range
(Min to Max)
50-150
(3)
Units
mg/kg
(2)
Treated
Concentration Range
(Min to Max)
25 - 50
e Data
(3)
Units
mg/kg
(4)
Cleanup Standard
or Goat
50
(3)
Units
mg/kg
Cost Information
Estimated or actual total and/or unit cost for this
project
$ per (unit)
$ (total)
What items or activities are included in these cost(s) (e.g., mobilization,
demobilization, excavation, waste handling)?
Person outside of company familiar with project (optional)
Name Comoiinv
Address
Is Literature Available on this Project? (You may
wish to include these citations in Part 6)
Yes No
Additional project information site conditions, mode of operation, and other pertinent information
).
20
-------
Technology Type
PART 5: REPRESENTATIVE APPLICATIONS, CLIENT REFERENCES, AND PERFORMANCE DATA
(continued)
Site Name or Industry Typ« W Client
dantity is Confidential;
Site Type or Waste Source (Check all that apply!
Agriculture
Battery recycling/disposal
Chloro-alkali
manufacturing
Coal gasification
Dry cleaning
Electroplating
Gasoline service
station/petroleum storage
facility
Herbicide
manufacturing/use
Industrial landfills
Inorganic/organic pigments
Machine shops
Metal ore mining and smelting
Municipal Landfill
Munitions Manufacturing
Paint/ink formulation
Pesticide manufacturing/use
Petroleum refining and reuse
Photographic products
Plastics manufacturing
Pulp and paper industry
Other organic chemical
manufacturing
Other inorganic chemical
manufacturing
Semiconductor manufacturing
Rubber manufacturing
Wood preserving
Uranium mining
Others (specify)
Location
City
State/Province:
Country
Project took place at site named
Yes
No
At another site (that is, a Test facility)
Yes
No
Regulation/Statute/Organization
(Check oil that apply)
Application or Project Type (Check all that apply!
RCRA corrective action
CERCLA
TSCA
Safe Drinking Water Act
LIST corrective action
State (specify)
DOD
DOE
Other (Specify)
Full-scale cleanup
Field demonstration
Pilot-scale treatability study
Bench-scale treatability study
RCRA Research, Development,
and Demonstration
TSCA National Demonstration
TSCA Research and Development
EPA SITE Demonstration Program
EPA SITE Emerging
Technology Program
Research
Other (specify)
Media Treated (Check all that apply)
Nat Applicable
Soil (in situ)
Soil (ex situ)
Sludge
Solid
Natural sediment (in situ)
Natural sediment (ex situ)
Ground water in situ
Off-gas from a primary
treatment technology
Dense nonaqueous phase
liquids (DNAPL) [in situl
Light nonaqueous phase
liquids (LNAPL) [in situ]
Other:
Volume/Quantity Treated
Equipment Scale (Check one only)
(Units)
Area treated (for in situ projects)
(Units)
Depth treated (for in situ projects)
(Units)
Bench
Pilot
Full
Project Status
Contracted
Month
In cleanup Yes
Completed
Month
.Year
No
Year
21
-------
Technology Type
PART 5: REPRESENTATIVE APPLICATIONS, CLIENT REFERENCES, AND PERFORMANCE DATA
(continued)
c. (continued)
Note: (1)
List one specific contaminant per line. Do not list such entire contaminant groups as VOCs or solvents.
TPH, which can be analyzed using a specific test method, can be listed as an individual contaminant.
(2) and (3) Indicate the appropriate units; for concentrations that were non-detect write N.D.; treated
concentration should b« lower than untreated concentration unless the technology is dewatering or
some other volume reduction method. If a concentration range cannot be given, provide an average
and note it as such.
(4) Specify the cleanup standard or goal, if known, for the individual contaminant for this project. For
example, if the project was part of a Superfund remedial action, the cleanup goal is specified in the
record of decision (ROD) for that site.
Performance Data
(11
Contaminant or Pollutant
Parameter
(Example) Benzene
(2]
Untreated
Concentration Range
(Min to Max)
50 - 1 50
(3)
Units
mg/kg
(2)
Treated
Concentration Range
(Min to Max)
25-50
(3)
Units
mg/kg
(4)
Cleanup Standard
or Goal
50
(3)
Units
mg/kg
&
Comments on Performance Data
Cost Information
Estimated or actual total and/or unit cost for this
project
$ per (unit)
$ (total)
What items or activities are included in these cost(s) (e.g., mobilization,
demobilization, excavation, waste handling)?
Person outside of company familiar with project (optional)
Name Company
Address
Phone
Is Literature Available on this Project? (You may
wish to include these citations in Part 6)
Yes No
Additional project information site conditions, mode of operation, and other pertinent information
.
22
-------
Technology Type
PART 5: REPRESENTATIVE APPLICATIONS, CLIENT REFERENCES, AND PERFORMANCE DATA
(continued)
d.
Sita Name or Industry Typs if Client
Identity is Confidential:
Sita Type or Wasta Source (Check all that apply)
Agriculture
Battery recycling/disposal
Chloro-alkali manufacturing
Coal gasification
Dry cleaning
Electroplating
Gasoline service
station/petroleum storage
facility
Herbicide manufacturing/use
Industrial landfills
Inorganic/organic pigments
_Machine shops
_Metal ore mining and smelting
_Municipal Landfill
_Munitions Manufacturing
_Paint/ink formulation
_Pesticide manufacturing/use
_Petroleum refining and reuse
_Photographic products
_Plastics manufacturing
_Pulp and paper industry
Other inorganic chemical
manufacturing
Semiconductor manufacturing
Rubber manufacturing
Wood preserving
Uranium mining
Others (specify)
Other organic chemical manufacturing
Location
City
State/Province:
Country
Project took place at site named
Yes
No
At another site (that is, a Test facility)
Yes
No
Regutation/Statute/Organization
(Check all that appty)
Application or Project Type (Check all that apply)
RCRA corrective action
CERCLA
TSCA
Safe Drinking Water Act
UST corrective action
State (specify)
DOD
DOE
Other (Specify)
Full-scale cleanup
Field demonstration
Pilot-scale treatability study
Bench-scale treatability study
RCRA Research, Development,
and Demonstration
TSCA National Demonstration
TSCA Research and Development
EPA SITE Demonstration Program
EPA SITE Emerging
Technology Program
Research
Other (specify)
Media Treated (Check all that apply)
Not Applicable
Soil (in situ)
Soil (ex situ)
Sludge
Solid
Natural sediment (in situ)
Natural sediment (ex situ)
Ground water in situ
Off-gas from a primary
treatment technology
Dense nonaqueous phase
liquids (DNAPL) [in situ]
Light nonaqueous phase
liquids (LNAPL) [in situ]
Other:
Volume/Quantity Treated
Equipment Scale (Check one only)
(Units)
Area treated (for in situ projects)
(Units)
Depth treated (for in situ projects)
(Units)
Bench
Pilot
Full
Project Status
Contracted
Month
In cleanup Yes
Completed
Month
_Year
No
Year
23
-------
venaor Name
Technology Type
PART 5: REPRESENTATIVE APPLICATIONS, CLIENT REFERENCES, AND PERFORMANCE DATA
(continued)
d. (continued)
Note: (1)
List one specific contaminant per line. Do not list such entire contaminant groups as VOCs or solvents.
TPH, which can be analyzed using a specific test method, can be listed as an individual contaminant.
(2) and (3) Indicate the appropriate units; for concentrations that were non-detect write N.D.; treated
concentration should be lower than untreated concentration unless the technology is dewatering or
some other volume reduction method, if a concentration range cannot be given, provide an average
and note it as such.
(4) Specify the cleanup standard or goal, if known, for the individual contaminant for this project. For
example, if the project was part of a Superfund remedial action, the cleanup goal is specified in the
record of decision (ROD) for that site.
Performance Data
(1)
Contaminant or Pollutant
Parameter
(Example) Benzene
Comments on Performanc
(2)
Untreated
Concentration Rancje
(Min to Max)
50-150
(3)
Units
mg/kg
(2)
Treated
Concentration Range
(Min to Max)
25 - 50
(3)
Units
mg/kg
(4)
Cleanup Standard
or Goat
50
(3)
Units
mg/kg
e Data
Cost Information
Estimated or actual total and/or unit cost for this
project
$ per (unit)
What items or activities are included in these cost(s) (e.g., mobilization,
demobilization, excavation, waste handling)?
Person outside of company familiar with project (optional) Is Literature Available on this Project? (You may
wish to include these citations in Part 6)
Name Company
Address
Yes No
Additional project information site conditions, mode of operation, and other pertinent information
). -
24
-------
Vendor Name
Technology Type
PART 5: REPRESENTATIVE APPLICATIONS, CLIENT REFERENCES, AND PERFORMANCE DATA
(continued)
Sito Name or Industry Typ* it Client
Site Typo or Waste Source (Check all that apply}
Agriculture Machine shops
Battery recycling/disposal Metal ore mining and smelting
Chloro-alkali manufacturing
Coal gasification
Dry cleaning
Electroplating
Gasoline service
station/petroleum storage
facility
Herbicide manufacturing/use
Municipal Landfill
Munitions Manufacturing
Paint/ink formulation
Pesticide manufacturing/use
Petroleum refining and reuse
Photographic products
Plastics manufacturing
Pulo and paper industry
Industrial landfills
Inorganic/organic pigments
Location
City
StatejProvince:
Country
Regulation/Statute/Organization
(Check all that apply)
RCRA corrective action
CEFtCLA
TSC4
Safe Drinking Water Act
UST corrective action
State (specifvl
DOD
DOE
Other (Specify)
Not Applicable
Volume/Quantity Treated
(Units)
Area treated (for in situ projects)
(Units)
Depth treated (for in situ projects)
(Units)
Other organic chemical manufacturing
Project took place at site named
Yes
No
Other inorganic chemical
manufacturing
Semiconductor manufacturing
Rubber manufacturing
Wood preserving
Uranium mining
Others Isoecifvi
At another site (that is, a Test facility)
Yes
No
Application or Project Typ« (Check all that apply}
Full-scale cleanup
Field demonstration
Pilot-scale treatability study
Bench-scale treatability study
RCRA Research, Development,
and Demonstration
TSCA National Demonstration
TSCA Research and Development
EPA SITE Demonstration Program
EPA SITE Emerging
Technology Program
Research
Other (soecifv!
Media Treated (Chock all that apply)
Soil (in situ)
Soil (ex situ)
Sludqe
Solid
Natural sediment (in situ)
Natural sediment (ex situ)
Ground water in situ
Equipment Scale (Check one only)
Bench
Pilot
Full
Off-gas from a primary
treatment technology
Dense nonaqueous phase
liquids (DNAPL) [in situl
Light nonaqueous phase
liquids (LNAPU [in situ]
Other:
Project Status
Contracted
Month Year
In cleanup Yes No
Completed
Month Year
25
-------
* ciJUUf ««aiiic
Technology Type
PART 5: REPRESENTATIVE APPLICATIONS, CLIENT REFERENCES, AND PERFORMANCE DATA
(continued)
e. (continued)
Note: (1)
List one specific contaminant per line. Do not list such entire contaminant groups as VOCs or solvents.
TPH, which can be analyzed using a specific test method, can be listed as an individual contaminant.
(2) and (3) Indicate the appropriate units; for concentrations that were non-detect write N.D.; treated
concentration should be lower than untreated concentration unless the technology is dewatering or
some other volume reduction method. If a concentration range cannot be given, provide an average
and note it as such.
(4) Specify the cleanup standard or goal, if known, for the individual contaminant for this project. For
example, if the project was part of a Superfund remedial action, the cleanup goal is specified in the
record of decision (ROD) for that site.
Performance Data
(11
Contaminant or Pollutant
Parameter
(Example) Benzene
Comments on Performanc
(2)
Untreated
Concentration Range
(Min to Max)
50 - 1 50
(3)
Units
mg/kg
(2)
Treated
Concentration Range
(Min to Max)
25 - 50
e Data
(3)
Units
mg/kg
(4)
Cleanup Standard
or Goat
50
(3)
Units
mg/kg
Cost Information
Estimated or actual total and/or unit cost for this
project
$ per (unit)
$ (total)
What items or activities are included in these cost(s) (e.g., mobilization,
demobilization, excavation, waste handling)?
Person outside of company familiar with project (optional)
Name Comoanv
Address
Phone _
Is Literature Available on this Project? (You may
wish to include these citations in Part 6)
Yes No
Additional project information site conditions, mode of operation, and other pertinent information
.
26
-------
vendor Name
Technology Type
PART 6: LITERATURE AND TECHNICAL REFERENCES
42. List and attach available documentation (for example, journal articles, conference papers,
patents) that best describes technology and vendor capabilities. References that contain
performance and cost data are of particular interest. Do not include personal references. EPA
reserves the right to add to the list other publicly available references.
Author(s)
Title
Journal/Conference
Data
NTIS/EPA Document Number(s)
Author(s)
Title
Journal/Conference
Date
NTIS/EPA Document Number(s)
Author(s)
Title
Journal/Conference
Date
NTIS/EPA Document Number(s)
Author(s)
Title
Journal/Conference
Date
NTIS/EPA Document Number(s)
Author(s)
Title
Journal/Conference
Date
NTIS/EPA Document Number(s)
27
-------
TfflS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
-------
APPENDIX A
BUSINESS CLASSIFICATION INFORMATION
The following information is intended to be used as a reference to answer question 2e. SIC code
information and definitions are given below. To determine if your company is a small and/or
disadvantaged business first identify the Standard Industrial Classification (SIC) code for your
company and secondly identify whether or not your company qualifies as a small business under that
SIC code. Small and disadvantaged businesses are defined below.
Definition of SIC Code
Standard Industrial Classification (SIC) Code - refers to the four-digit number assigned by the
government to classify establishments by the type of activity in which they are engaged. The codes
are published by the Government in the Standard Industrial Classification Manual. The Manual is
intended to cover the entire field of economic activities. It classifies and defines activities by industry
categories and is the source used by the Small Business Administration (SBA) as a guide in defining
industries for size standards. The number of employees or annual receipts indicates the maximum
allowed for a concern, including its affiliates, to be considered small (Federal Acquisition Circular
(FAC) 90-16, December 21, 1992, Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR), 19.102(g)).
Most remediation firms should fall under one of the SIC codes defined below:
The following SIC code definitions are taken from the Standard Industrial Classification Manual,
1987, Office of Management and Budget.
SIC code 4953: Refuse Systems (i.e., activities related to actual site cleanup) Establishments
primarily engaged in the collection and disposal of refuse by processing or destruction or in the
operation of incinerators, waste treatment plans, landfills, or other sites for disposal of such materials.
Establishments primarily engaged in collecting and transporting refuse without such disposal are
classified in Transportation, Industry 4212.
Acid waste, collection and disposal of
Ashes, collection and disposal of
Dumps, operation of
Garbage: collecting, destroying, and
processing
Hazardous waste material disposal sites
Incinerator operation
Landfill, sanitary: operation of
Radioactive waste materials, disposal of
Refuse systems
Rubbish collection and disposal
Sludge disposal sites
Street refuse systems
Waste materials disposal at sea
SIC code 8711: Engineering Services (i.e., activities related to remedial investigations, feasibility
studies, and remedial design) Establishments primarily engaged in providing professional engineering
services. Establishments primarily providing and supervising their own engineering staff on
temporary contract to other firms are included in this industry. Establishments providing engineering
A-l
-------
personnel, but not general supervision, are classified in Industry 7363. Establishments primarily
engaged in providing architectural engineering services are classified in Industry 8712, and those
providing photogrammetric engineering services are classified in Industry 8713.
Designing: ship, boat, and machine
Engineering services: industrial, civil,
electrical, mechanical, petroleum,
marine, and design
Definitions of Small and Disadvanta^ed/Minoritv Business
Machine tool designers
Marine engineering services
Petroleum engineering services
The following small business size standards established by the SBA are taken from FAC90-16
December 21, 1992, FAR 19.102.
SIC Code Description
Size
4943
8711
Refuse Systems $6.0 million
Engineering Services
Military and Aerospace Equipment
and Military Weapons $13.5 million
Marine Engineering and Naval Architecture $9.0 million
Other Engineering Services .' " $2.5 million
The following information is taken from FAC 90-16 December 21, 1992, FAR 19.101.
Small business concern - means a concern, including its affiliates, that is independently owned and
operated, not dominant in the field of operation in which it is bidding on government contracts and
qualified as a small business under the criteria and size standards in 13 CFR Part 121 Such a
concern is "not dominant in its field of operation" when it does not exercise a controlling or major
influence on a national basis in a kind of business activity in which a number of business concerns are
primarily engaged. In determining whether dominance exists, consideration shall be given to all
appropriate factors, including volume of business, number of employees, financial resources
competitive status or position, ownersMp or control of materials, processes, patents, license '
agreements, facilities, sales territory, and nature of business activity.
Small disadvantaged/minority busings concern - means a small business concern that is at least 51
percent unconditionally owned by one or more individuals who are both socially and economically
disadvantage*!, or a publicly owned business that has at least 51 percent of its stock unconditionally
owned by one or more socially and economically disadvantage individuals and that has its
management and daily business controlled by one or more such individuals. This term also means a
small business concern that is at least 51 percent unconditionally owned by an economically
disadvantaged Indian tribe or Native Hawaiian Organization, or a publicly owned business that has at
least 51 percent of its stock unconditionally owned by one of these entities, that has its management
A-2
-------
and daily business controlled by members of an economically disadvantaged Indian tribe or Native
Hawaiian Organization, and that meets the requirements of 13 CFR 124.
(a) "Socially disadvantaged individuals" means individuals who have been subjected to racial
or ethnic prejudice or cultural bias because of their identify as a member of a group without regard to
their qualities as individuals.
(b) "Economically disadvantaged individuals" means socially disadvantaged individuals whose
ability to compete in the free enterprise system is impaired due to diminished opportunities to obtain
capital and credit as compared to others in the same line of business who are not socially
disadvantaged. Individuals who certify that they are members of named groups (Black Americans,
Hispanic Americans, Native Americans, Asian-Pacific Americans, Subcontinent-Asian Americans) are
to be considered socially and economically disadvantaged.
(1) "Subcontinent Asian Americans" means United States citizens whose origins are in
India, Pakistan, Bangladesh, Sri Lanka, Bhutan, or Nepal.
(2) "Asian Pacific Americans" means United States citizens whose origins are in
Japan, China, the Philippines, Vietnam, Korea, Samoa, Guam, the U.S. Trust Territory of the
Pacific Islands (Republic of Palau), the Northern Mariana Islands, Laos, Kampuchea
(Cambodia), Taiwan, Burma, Thailand, Malaysia, Indonesia, Singapore, Brunei, Republic of
the Marshall Islands, or the Federated States of Micronesia.
(3) "Native Americans" means American Indians, Eskimos, Aleuts, and Native
Hawaiians.
(c) "Native Hawaiian Organization" means any community service organization serving
Native Hawaiians in, and chartered as a not-for-profit organization by, the State of Hawaii, which is
controlled by Native Hawaiians, and whose business activities will principally benefit such Native
Hawaiians.
(d) "Indian tribe" means any Indian tribe, band, nation, or other organized group or
community of Indians, including any Alaska Native Corporation as defined in 13 CFR 124.100 which
is recognized as eligible for the special programs and services provided by the U.S. to Indians
because of their status as Indians, or which is recognized as such by the State in which such tribe,
band, nation, group, or community resides.
Women-owned - as used in this form, means a business that is at least 51 percent owned by a woman
or women who are U.S. citizens and who also control and operate the business.
A-3
-------
APPENDIX B
KEY TO CONTAMINANT GROUPS
CONTAMINANT GROUP CODES FOR HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES LIST
Qr
|p
|Ł
|F
f
Halogenated volatiles
Halogenated semivolatiles
Nonhalogenated volatiles
Nonhalogenated semivolatiles
Organic pesticides/herbicides
Dioxins/furans
PCBs
Polynuclear aromatics (PNAs)
Solvents
Benzene-toluene-ethylbenzene-xylene (BTEX)
Organic cyanide
Organic corrosives
Inorganic
[jyj| Heavy metals
|N | Nonmetallic toxic elements (As, F)
|Q | Radioactive metals
|p | Asbestos
|Q | Inorganic cyanides
|R | Inorganic corrosives
Miscellaneous
|S | Explosives/propellants
[T | Organometallic pesticides/herbicides
B-l
-------
HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES
Organic Contaminant Group
CAS No.
208968 Acenaphthylene D,H
83329 Acenaphihene D,H
75070 Acetaldehyde C
67641 Acetone C,I
75058 Acetonitrile C,K
98862 Acetophenone D
591082 Acetyl-2-thiourea, 1 D
107028 Acrolein . . . . C
79061 Acrylamide D
79107 Acrylic acid CL
107131 Acrylonitrile C
124049 Adipic acid L
116063 Aldicarb E
309002 Aldrin E
107186 AHyl alcohol E
62533 Aniline D,I,L
120127 Anthracene D,H
1912249 Atrazine E
2642719 Azinphos-ethyl E
86500 Azinphos-methyl E
151564 Aziridine C
71432 Benzene C,I,J
98884 Benzene carbonyl chloride B
92875 Benzidine D
205992 Benzofluoranthene,3,4- H
65850 Benzoic acid D,L
100470 Benzonitrile C,I
95169 Benzothiazole,l,2- D,I
50328 Benzo (a) pyrene D,H
206440 Benzo (j,k) fluorene H
207089 Benzo (k) fluoranthene D,H
100447 Benzyl chloride A
56553 Benz (a) anthracene D,H
117817 Bis (2-ethyl hexyl) phthalate D
111911 Bis (2-chloroethoxy) methane B
111444 Bis (2-chloroethyl) ether B
542881 Bis (chloromethyl) ether ........ B
75274 Bromodichloromethane A
74964 Bromomethane A
1689845 Bromoxynil E
106990 Butadiene, 1,3- C
71363 Butanol C
85687 Butlbenzyl phthalate D
94826 Butyric acid, 4-2(2,4-dichlorop) . . . C,L
CAS No.
133062
63252
1563662
75150
56235
78196
75876
57749
106478
108907
67663
74873
107302
106898
91587
95578
59507
2921882
218019
56724
8021394
108394
106445
98828
21725462
110827
108941
72548
72559
50293
78488
333415
132649
53703
124481
106934
96128
1918009
95501
541731
106467
91941
75718
75343
Captan B
Carbaryl E
Carbofuran E,F
Carbon disulfide C
Carbon tetrachloride A
Carbophenothion E
Chloral A
Chlordane E
Chloroaniline, p- B
Chlorobenzene A
Chloroform A
Chloromethane A
Chloromethyl methyl ether A
Chloromethyloxirane, 2- E
Chloronaphthalene, 2- B
Chlorophenol, 2- B
Chloro-3-methylphenol, 4- B
Chloropyrifos E
Chrysene D,H
Coumaphos E
Creosote H
Cresol, m- D
Cresol, p- D
Cumene C,I
Cyanazine E
Cyclohexane C,I
Cyclohexanone C
ODD E
DDE .- E
DDT E
DBF C.E
Diazinon E
Dibenzofuran D
Dibenz (a,h) anthracene D,H
Dibromachloromethane A
Dibromoethane, 1,2- A
Dibromo-3-chloropropane, 1,2- ... A
Dicamba E
Dichlorobenzene, 1,2- B
Dichlorobenzene, 1,3- B
Dichlorobenzene, 1,4- B
Dichlorobenzidine, 3,3- B
Dichlorodifiuoromethane A
Dichloroethane, 1,1- A
B-2
-------
CAS No.
CAS No.
107062 Dichloroethane, 1,2- A
75354 Dichloroethene, 1,1- A
156592 Dichloroethylene, cis-1,2- A
156605 Dichloroethylene, trans-1,2- A
120832 Dichlorophenol, 2,4- B
94757 Dichlorophenoxyacetic acid, 2- .... L
78875 Dichloropropane, 1,2- A
542756 Dichloropropene, 1,3- A
62737 Dichlorvos E
115322 Dicofol E
60571 Dieldrin E
84662 Diethyl phthalate . D
111466 Diethylene glycol D,I
1660942 Diisopropylmethylphosphonate . . . . D
60515 Dimethoate E
119904 Dimethoxybenzidine, 3,3- D
105679 Dimethyl phenol, 2,4- D
13113 Dimethyl phthalate D
77781 Dimethyl sulfate C
99650 Dinitrobenzene, 1,3- D
51285 Dinitrophenol, 2,4- D
121142 Dinitrotoluene, 2,4- D
606202 Dinitrotoluene, 2,6- D
88857 Dinoseb E
123911 Dioxane, 1,4 . . C
78342 Dioxathion E
122667 Diphenylhydrazine, 1,2- D,H
85007 Diquat E
298044 Disulfoton C,E
330541 Diuron E
84742 Di-n-butyl phthalate D
117840 Di-n-octyl phthalate D
115297 Endosulfan E
959988 Endosulfan I
33212659 Endosulfan II E
1031078 Endolsulfan sulfate E
145733 Endothall E
72208 Endrin E
7421934 Endrin aldehyde E
563122 Ethion E
141786 Ethyl acetate C
100414 Ethyl benzene C,J
75003 Ethyl chloride A,I
60297 Ethyl ether C
107211 Ethylene glycol I
110805 Ethylene glycol monoethyl
ether C,I
759944 Ethylpropylthio carbomate, S- . . . . E
122145
86737
50000
64186
110009
98011
765344
76448
1024573
118741
87683
60873
60873
60873
77474
67721
70304
110543
1689834
78831
78591
143500
58899
121755
108316
123331
126987
67561
16752775
72435
79221
78933
108101
80626
101144
75092
23855
91203
100016
98953
100027
. Fenitrothion
Fluorene
Formaldehyde
Formic acid
Furan
Furfural
Glycidyaldehyde
Heptachlor
Heptachlor epoxide
Hexachlorobenzene
Hexachlorobutadieene
Hexachlorocyclohexane, alpha- . .
Hexachlorocyclohexane, beta- . .
Hexachlorocyclohexane, delta- . .
Hexachlorocyclopentadiene ....
Hexachloroethane
Hexachlorophene
Hexane
loxynil
Isobutanol
Isophorone
Kepone
Lindane .
Malathion
Maleic anhydride
Maleric hydrazide
Methacrylonitrile
Methanol
Methomyl
Methoxychlor
Methyl chlorocarbonate
Methyl ethyl ketone
Methyl isobutyl ketone
Methyl methacrylate
Methylene bis
(2-chloroaniline)
Methylene chloride
Mirex
Naphthalene
Nitroaniline, p-
Nitrobenzene
Nitrophenol, 4-
. . E
. . D,H
. . C
. . L
. . F
I.C
G
. . E
. . E
. . B
. . B
. . E
. . E
. . E
. . B
. . B
. . B
. . C,I
. . E
. . C
D
E
E
. . C,E
. . E
. . E
. . C
. . C
. . E
. . E
. . L
. . C
. . C,I
. . C
. . B
. . A
E
. . D,H
. . D
. . D
. . D
B-3
-------
Organic Contaminant Group (continued)
CAS No.
1116547 Nitrosodiethanolamine, n- D
55185 Nitrosodiethylamine, n- D
62759 Nitrosodimethylamine, n- D
86306 Nitrosodiphenylamine, n- D
930552 Nitrosopyrrolidine, n- D
924163 Nitroso-di-n-butylamine, n- D
615532 Nitroso-di-n-methylurethane, n- . . . D
99990 Nitrotoluene, 4- D
56382 Parathion, ethyl- E
298000 Parathion, methyl- E
1336363 PCBs G
608935 Pentachlorobenzene B
76017 Pentachloroethane B
82688 Pentachloronitrobenzene B
87865 Pentachlorophenol B
85018 Phenanthrene D,H
108952 Phenol D
139662 Phenyl sulfide D
62384 Phenylmercurie acetate E
298022 Phorate C,E
75445 Phosgene E
13171216 Phosphamidon E
7803512 Phosphine E
85449 Phthalic anhydride D,E
23950585 Pronamide D
129000 Pyrene D,H
110861 Pyridine C,I
91225 Quinoline D,H
108463 Resorcinol D
299843 Ronnel E
57249 Strychnine E,H
100425 Styrene C
CAS No.
746016
95943
630206
79345
127184
58902
3689245
109999
137268
108883
584849
8001352
93721
75252
120821
71556
79005
79016
75694
933788
95954
88062
609198
93765
933788
27323417
126727
TCDD F
Tetrachlorobenzene, 1,2,4,5- B
Tetrachloroethane, 1,1,1,2- ...... A,E,I
Tetrachloroethane, 1,1,2,2- A
Tetrachloroethene A
Tetrachlorophenol, 2,3,4,6 B
Tetraethyldithiopyrophosphate . . . . E
Tetrahydrofuran F,I
Thiram E
Toluene C,J
Toluene diisocyanate D
Toxaphene E
TP, 2,4,5- E
Tribromomethane A
Trichlorobenzene, 1,2,4- B
Trichloroethane, 1,1,1- A
Trichloroethane, 1,1,2- A
Trichloroethylene A
Trichlorofluoromethane A
Trichlorophenol, 2,3,5- B
Trichlorophenol, 2,4,5- B
Trichlorophenol, 2,4,6- B
Trichlorophenol, 3,4,5- B
Trichlorophenoxyacetic acid, 2- . . . L
Trichloro-l,2,2-trifluoroethane .... A,I
Triethanolamine E
Tris (2,3-dibromopropyl) phosphate . B
108054 Vinyl acetate C
75014 Vinyl chloride A
81812 Warfarin E
108383 Xylene, m- C,J
95476 Xylene, o- C,J
106423 Xylene, p- C,J
B-4
-------
Inorganic Contaminant Group
CAS No.
7429905
20859738
7440360
7440382
1327533
1303339
7440393
542621
7440417
7440439
13765190
7778543
1333820
7440473
7440484
7440508
544923
7720787
7439896
7439921
7439965
7439976
7440020
7718549
10102440
7789006
151508
506616
7783008
7782492
7440224
506649
7440235
26628228
7681494
7775113
Aluminum
Aluminum phosphide
Antimony
Arsenic
Arsenic trioxide
Arsenic trisulfide
Barium
Barium cyanide
Beryllium
Cadmium . . .
Calcium chromate
Calcium hypochlorite
Chromic acid
Chromium
Chromium (III)
Chromium (VI)
Cobalt . ....
Cooper
Copper cyanide
Ferrous sulfate
Iron
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Nickel chloride
Nitrogen dioxide
Potassium chromate
Potassium cyanide
Potassium silver cyanide ....
Selenious acid
Selenium
Silver
Silver cyanide
Sodium
Sodium azide
Sodium fluoride
Sodium chromate
. . . . M
. . . . M
. . . . M
. . . . M
. . . . M
. . . . M
M
.... M,Q
. . . M
. . . . M
M
. . . . M
. . . . M,R
. . . . M
M
. , . . M
. . . . M
. . . . M
.... M,Q
. . . . M
. . . M
. . . . M
. . . . M
M
. . . . M
. . . . M
. . . . R
. . . . M
. ; . . M,Q
M,Q
....MR
. . . . M
. . . . M
.... M,Q
. . . . M
. . . . M
. , . M
. . . . M
CAS No.
143339
1310732
7440280
1314325
563688
6533739
7791120
10102451
12039520
7446186
7440291
1314621
7440666
557211
1314847
7733020
Explosive)
CAS No.
7664417
131748
7773060
460195
2691410
302012
55630
99990
26628228
99354
118967
Organom<
CAS No.
630104
78002
Sodium cyanide
Sodium hydroxide
Thallium
Thallic oxide
Thallium acetate
Thallium carbonate ...
Thallium chloride
Thallium nitrate
Thallium selenide
Thallium (I) sulfate
Thorium . .
Vanadium pentoxide
Zinc .
Zinc cyanide
Zinc phosphide
Zinc sulfate
Tropellants
Ammonia
Ammonium picrate
Ammonium sulfamate
Cyanogen
Cyclotetramethylenetetranitramine .
Hydrazine
Nitroglycerine
Nitrotoluene, 4-
Sodium azide
Trinitrobenzene 135
Trinitrotoluene
itallic Compound
Selenourea ....
Tetraethyl lead . . .
M Q
. M R
. M
M
M
M
. M
M
M
. M
M
. M
M
. M,Q
M
. M
. S
s
s
s
. s
s
s
. s
. M S
s
s
u
u
B-5
-------
THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
-------
Appendix C
List of VISITT 4.0 Vendors by Technology
ACID EXTRACTION
ADVANCED RECOVERY SYSTEMS, INC.
CENTER FOR HAZARDOUS MATERIALS RESEARCH
COGNIS, INC.
COGNIS, INC.
EARTH TREATMENT TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
IT CORPORATION
LOCKHEED CORPORATION
ADSORPTION/ABSORPTION - IN SITU
DYNAPHORE, INC.
ENVIRONMENTAL FUEL SYSTEMS, INC.
AIR SPARGING
BILLINGS & ASSOCIATES, INC.
ENVIROGEN, INC.
HAYWARD BAKER ENVIRONMENTAL, INC.
HORIZONTAL TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
IEG TECHNOLOGIES CORP.
IT CORPORATION
QUATERNARY INVESTIGATIONS, INC.
TERRA VAC, INC.
BIOREMEDIATION - IN SITU GROUNDWATER
ABB ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC.
BIO-GENESIS TECHNOLOGIES
ECOLOGY TECHNOLOGIES INTERNATIONAL, INC.
ECOTECHNIEK B.V.
ELECTROKINETICS, INC.
ENSR CONSULTING AND ENGINEERING
EODT SERVICES, INC.
ESE ENVIRONMENTAL, INC.
GAIA RESOURCE, INC.
GEO-MICROBIAL TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
GROUNDWATER TECHNOLOGY, INC.
IT CORPORATION
KEMRON ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC.
MICRO-BAG INTERNATIONAL, INC.
MICROBIAL ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES (MES)
OHM REMEDIATION SERVICES CORPORATION
REMEDIATION TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
SBP TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
WASTE STREAM TECHNOLOGY, INC.
YELLOWSTONE ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE, INC.
BIOREMEDIATION - IN SITU LAGOON
BIO-GENESIS TECHNOLOGIES
ECOLOGY TECHNOLOGIES INTERNATIONAL, INC.
LIMNOFK INC./GOLDER ASSOCIATES
OHM REMEDIATION SERVICES CORPORATION
PRAXAIR, INC.
BIOREMEDIATION - IN SITU SOIL
ABB ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC.
BILLINGS & ASSOCIATES, INC.
BIO-GENESIS TECHNOLOGIES
BIOGEE INTERNATIONAL, INC.
DETOX INDUSTRIES, INC.
ECOLOGY.TECHNOLOGIES INTERNATIONAL, INC.
ELECTROKINETICS, INC.
ESE ENVIRONMENTAL, INC.
GEO-MICROBIAL TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
GRACE DEARBORN, INC.
GROUND WATER TECHNOLOGY, INC.
HAYWARD BAKER ENVIRONMENTAL, INC.
IN-SITU FIXATION, INC.
KEMRON ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC.
MICRO-BAG INTERNATIONAL, INC.
MICROBIAL ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES (MES)
QUATERNARY INVESTIGATIONS, INC.
SBP TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
WASTE STREAM TECHNOLOGY, INC.
BIOREMEDIATION - NOT OTHERWISE SPECIFIED
AP TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
B&S RESEARCH, INC.
BEAREHAVEN RECLAMATION, INC.
BIO-PRO CORP.
BIOREMEDIATION SERVICE, INC.
BIOREMEDIATION TECHNOLOGY SERVICES, INC.
CHEMPETE, INC.
CLYDE ENGINEERING SERVICE
DETOX INDUSTRIES, INC.
ECO-TEC, INC./ECOLOGY TECHNOLOGY
ENSITE, INC.
EPG BIOSERVICES INC.
ETUS, INC.
MICHIGAN BIOTECHNOLOGY INSTITUTE
PERINO TECHNICAL SERVICES, INC.
SYBRON CHEMICALS, INC.
BIOREMEDIATION - SLURRY PHASE
BIO SOLUTIONS, INC.
BIO-GENESIS TECHNOLOGIES
BIOGEE INTERNATIONAL, INC.
BOGART ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC.
ECOLOGY TECHNOLOGIES INTERNATIONAL, INC.
EIMCO PROCESS EQUIPMENT CO.
EODT SERVICES, INC.
GENESIS ECO SYSTEMS, INC.
GEO-MICROBIAL TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
IT CORPORATION
J.R. SIMPLOT COMPANY
OHM REMEDIATION SERVICES CORPORATION
PRAXAIR, INC.
REMEDIATION TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
SBP TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
WASTE STREAM TECHNOLOGY, INC.
YELLOWSTONE ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE, INC.
YELLOWSTONE ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE, INC.
BIOREMEDIATION - SOLD3 PHASE
ABB ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC.
ABB ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC.
ABB ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC.
ALVAREZ BROTHERS, INC.
ARCTECH,INC.
BIO-GENESIS TECHNOLOGIES
BIOGEE INTERNATIONAL, INC.
BIOREMEDIATION SERVICE, INC.
BIOREMEDIATION SERVICE, INC.
CLEAN-UP TECHNOLOGY, INC.
C-l
-------
EARTH TECH
EARTHFAX ENGINEERING, INC.
ECOLOGY TECHNOLOGIES INTERNATIONAL, INC.
ENSR CONSULTING AND ENGINEERING
ETUS, INC.
GEO-MICROBIAL TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
GRACE DEARBORN, INC.
GROUNDWATER TECHNOLOGY, INC.
IT CORPORATION
MICROBIAL ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES (MES)
MYCOTECH CORPORATION
OHM REMEDIATION SERVICES CORPORATION
PERINO TECHNICAL SERVICES, INC.
REMEDIATION TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
SBP TECHNOLOGIES. INC.
WASTE STREAM TECHNOLOGY, INC.
BIOVENTING
ABB ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC.
BATTELLE PACIFIC NORTHWEST LABORATORIES
DAMES & MOORE
ENGINEERING-SCIENCE, INC.
ENSR CONSULTING AND ENGINEERING
ENVIROGEN.INC.
ENVIRONEERING
H2O SCIENCE, INC.
HAYWARD BAKER ENVIRONMENTAL, INC.
rr CORPORATION
M1TTELHAUSER CORPORATION
OHM REMEDIATION SERVICES CORPORATION
QUATERNARY INVESTIGATIONS, INC.
TERRA VAC, INC.
CHEMICAL TREATMENT - DECHLORINATION
COMMODORE ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC.
SDTX TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
CHEMICAL TREATMENT - IN SITU GROUNDWATER
ENV1ROMETAL TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
GEOCHEM DIVISION OF TERRA VAC
INTERA. INC.
CHEMICAL TREATMENT - OTHER
CLEANTECH OF ARKANSAS, INC.
CORPEX TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
DAVY INTERNATIONAL - ENVIRONMENTAL DIV.
INTEGRATED CHEMISTRIES, INC.
RMT.INC.
SOLUCORP INDUSTRIES LTD.
VIKING INDUSTRIES
CHEMICAL TREATMENT - OXIDATION/REDUCTION
ADVANCED RECOVERY SYSTEMS, INC.
ARCTECH. INC.
ARCTECH, INC.
DELPHI RESEARCH, INC.
ELI ECO LOGIC INTERNATIONAL, INC.
EM&C ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES
ETUS, INC.
G.E.M., INC.
HIGH VOLTAGE ENVIRONMENTAL APPLICATIONS
IT CORPORATION
FT CORPORATION
MOLTEN METAL TECHNOLOGY, INC.
SYNTHETICA TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
TERRA VAC, INC.
THERMOCHEM, INC.
DELIVERY/EXTRACTION SYSTEMS
DRILEX SYSTEMS, INC.
EASTMAN CHERRINGTON ENVIRONMENTAL
HORIZONTAL TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
NOVATERRA, INC.
DUAL PHASE EXTRACTION
BILLINGS & ASSOCIATES, INC.
DAMES & MOORE
EG & G ENVIRONMENTAL, INC.
FIRST ENVIRONMENT, INC.
IT CORPORATION
TERRA VAC, INC.
ELECTRICAL SEPARATION
ELECTRO-PETROLEUM, INC.
ELECTROKINETICS, INC.
WATER AND SLURRY PURIFICATION PROCESS
ELECTRO-THERMAL GASIFICATION - IN SITU
BIO-ELECTRICS, INC.
MAGNETIC SEPARATION
S.G. FRANTZ CO., INC.
MATERIALS HANDLING/PHYSICAL SEPARATION
CANONIE ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES CORP.
MICROFLUIDICS CORP.
ONSITE * OFSITE INC./BATTELLE PNL
PORTEC, INC.
RECRA ENVIRONMENTAL, INC.
OFF-GAS TREATMENT
BECO ENGINEERING CO.
BOHN BIOFILTER CORP.
ECOLOGY TECHNOLOGIES INTERNATIONAL, INC.
ENVIROGEN, INC.
GENERAL ATOMICS
IT CORPORATION
KSE, INC.
MEMBRANE TECHNOLOGY & RESEARCH, INC.
MICHIGAN BIOTECHNOLOGY INSTITUTE
NUCON INTERNATIONAL, INC.
PROCESS TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
PRODUCT CONTROL
PURUS, INC.
THERMATRIX, INC.
ZAPIT TECHNOLOGY, INC.
PNEUMATIC FRACTURING
ACCUTECH REMEDIAL SYSTEMS, INC.
TERRA VAC, INC.
PYROLYSIS
BIO-ELECTRICS, INC.
ENERGY RECLAMATION, INC.
PLASMA ENERGY APPLIED TECHNOLOGY (PEAT)
PRODUCT CONTROL
VANCE IDS, INC.
SLAGGING
HORSEHEAD RESOURCE DEVELOPMENT CO., INC.
TEXACO, INC.
SOIL FLUSHING - IN SITU
HORIZONTAL TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
SOH, VAPOR EXTRACTION
DAMES & MOORE
DOW ENVIRONMENTAL, INC.
C-2
-------
ENVIROGEN, INC.
GEO-CON, INC.
IT CORPORATION
KAP & SEP A, LTD.
QUATERNARY INVESTIGATIONS, INC.
TERRA VAC, INC.
SOIL WASHING
ADVANCED RECOVERY SYSTEMS, INC.
AEA TECHNOLOGY
ALTERNATIVE REMEDIAL TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
B&W NUCLEAR ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC.
BENCHEM
BERGMANN USA
BIOTROL, INC.
CANONIE ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES CORP.
DIVESCO, INC.
EARTH DECONTAMINATORS, INC. (EDI)
ENSR CONSULTING AND ENGINEERING
GENESIS ECO SYSTEMS, INC.
GEOCHEM DIVISION OF TERRA VAC
GEOCYCLE ENVIRONNEMENT, INC.
HYDRIPLEX, INC.
KINIT ENTERPRISES
LOCKHEED CORPORATION
OHM REMEDIATION SERVICES CORPORATION
ON-SITE TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
SANFORD COHEN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.
SOIL TECHNOLOGY, INC.
TECHNOLOGY SCIENTIFIC, LTD.
TUBOSCOPE VETCO ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES
WESTINGHOUSE REMEDIATION SERVICES, INC.
SOLVENT EXTRACTION
A/S PHOENIX CONTRACTORS/PHOENIX MILJOE
ART INTERNATIONAL, INC.
CF SYSTEMS CORPORATION
DEHYDRO-TECH CORPORATION
EM&C ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES
ENSR CONSULTING AND ENGINEERING
ENVIROGEN, INC.
GEO-MICROBIAL TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
INTEGRATED CHEMISTRIES, INC.
NATIONAL RESEARCH COUNCIL OF CANADA
RESOURCES CONSERVATION CO.
SRE, INC.
TERRA-KLEEN RESPONSE GROUP, INC.
SURFACTANT ENHANCED RECOVERY - IN SITU
ECOSITE, INC.
S.S. PAPADOPULOS & ASSOCIATES, INC.
SURTEK, INC.
THERMAL DESORPTTON
ADVANCED ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC.
ADVANCED SOIL TECHNOLOGIES
ARIEL INDUSTRIES, INC.
BIRD ENVIRONMENTAL GULF COAST, INC.
CANONIE ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES CORP.
CARLO ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
CARSON ENVIRONMENTAL
CASWAN ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES LTD.
CLEAN-UP TECHNOLOGY, INC.
CONTAMINATION TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
CONTECK ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC.
COVENANT ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
DBA, INC.
ECOTECHNIEK B.V.
ENVIRO-KLEAN SOILS, INC.
ENVIRO-SOIL REMEDIATION, INC.
HAZEN RESEARCH, INC.
HRUBETZ ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC.
IT CORPORATION
IT CORPORATION
KALKASKA CONSTRUCTION SERVICE, INC.
MAXYMILLIAN TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
MERCURY RECOVERY SERVICES, INC.
MIDWEST SOIL REMEDIATION, INC.
O'BRIEN & GERE TECHNICAL SERVICES, INC.
PET-CON SOIL REMEDIATION, INC.
PHILIP ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES CORP.
PRODUCTCONTROL
RECYCLING SCIENCE INTERNATIONAL, INC.
REMEDIATION TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
REMTECH, INC.
ROY F. WESTON, INC.
RUST INTERNATIONAL, INC.
SEAVIEW THERMAL SYSTEMS
SEPARATION AND RECOVERY SYSTEMS, INC.
SOIL REMEDIATION OF PHILADELPHIA, INC.
SOILTECH ATP SYSTEMS, INC.
SOUTHWEST SOIL REMEDIATION, INC.
SPI/ASTEC
TEXAROME, INC.
THERMOTECH SYSTEMS CORPORATION
TPS TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
WESTERN RESEARCH INSTITUTE
WESTINGHOUSE REMEDIATION SERVICES, INC.
THERMALLY ENHANCED RECOVERY - IN SITU
BATTELLE PACIFIC NORTHWEST LABORATORIES
BIO-ELECTRICS, INC.
EM&C ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES
EM&C ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES
HRUBETZ ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC.
IIT RESEARCH INSTITUTE
KAI TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
NOVATERRA, INC.
PRAXIS ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
R.E. WRIGHT ENVIRONMENTAL, INC. (REWEI)
SIVE SERVICES
THERMATRK, INC.
VITRIFICATION
B&W NUCLEAR ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC.
BATTELLE PACIFIC NORTHWEST LABORATORIES
BIO-ELECTRICS, INC.
ECOTECHNIEK B.V.
EET CORPORATION
ELECTRO-PYROLYSIS, INC.
EM&C ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES
GEOSAFE CORPORATION
MULTIPLEX XTALTITE-TEXILLA ENVIRONMENTAL
RETECH, DIV. OF LOCKHEED ENV. SYS.&TECH.
SELLER POLLUTION CONTROL SYSTEMS, INC.
STIR-MELTER, INC.(SUBSID/GLASSTECH,INC.)
VORTEC CORPORATION
WASTE DESTRUCTION TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
C-3
-------
------- |