-------
 I
 i
 en
 .o
 o
 s
 
-------
information on incineration (offsite), solidification/
stabilization, mechanical soil aeration (MSA), open
burn/open   detonation   (OB/OD),   and
neutralization.]  For ex situ projects, the majority
(60 percent) have been completed. This percentage
is primarily due to the incorporation of status data
for solidification/stabilization, incineration (offsite),
MSA, OB/OD, and neutralization projects selected
in RODs dating  back to FY 1982.  The eighth
edition  of the ASR did not contain status
information for any of these projects.
EPA analyzed approximately 206 completed
projects to calculate the average time to complete
cleanup.  The time to complete cleanup was defined
as the time from start of operation to completion
of a project.  For ex situ technologies the average
time to complete  cleanup was 13 months, and for
in situ technologies,  19 months.
In terms of individual technologies, the majority
of projects for the most common ex situ
technologies   [solidification/stabilization,
incineration  (off site), thermal desorption, and
incineration(on site)] have been completed. For
these four technologies,  the percent of projects
completed has ranged from 55  percent to 79
percent.  Bioremediation (ex situ) represents  the
largest number of projects (33 percent) that are
operational even  though it is only the fifth most
common ex situ technology.  This high percentage
is most likely due to the length of treatment time
required for bioremediation as  compared with
                  other  ex  situ  technologies.    Although
                  bioremediation   enhances  the  ability of
                  microorganisms  to  degrade  or  detoxify
                  contaminants, the time required to reach cleanup
                  goals is often limited by the natural degradation
                  process.  Other factors such as  temperature and
                  moisture — which are influenced by the weather
                  — play a large role in determining the degradation
                  rate for bioremediation.  Because of these
                  considerations, bioremediation  typically requires
                  a longer period of time for treatment compared
                  to other ex situ technologies such as incineration,
                  thermal desorption, or solidification/stabilization
                  where treatment time is primarily limited by the
                  capacity and throughput of the equipment used.
                  For a few technologies representing less than 10
                  applications each, there is little change in status.
                  For  example,  in August 1996, there were 12
                  projects in the predesign or design phase for soil
                  washing, solvent extraction, vitrification,  cyanide
                  oxidation, and hot air injection.  As of August
                  1998, 10 of those projects are still in the predesign
                  or design phase,  except for two soil washing
                  projects that have been cancelled.
                  The EPA REACH IT on-line searchable database
                  presents information on project status and projected
                  schedule as well as some  brief performance and
                  operating data on remedial, removal,  and non-
                  Superfund projects that have been completed. Data
                  provided include periods of operation, typical pre-
                  and  post-treatment concentrations  of key
                       Figure 12. Superfund Remedial Actions:
      Treatment Technologies In the Remedial Pipeline by Technology Type
                          Predesign/    Design Complete/:  Operational    Completed    Total
                              Design      Being Installed
 Ex Situ Source Control Technologies
 August 1996	32%
                 18%
                                 14%
                                               36%
                                                           159
 August 1998
                              25%
                                                9%
                                                               15%
                                                                             51%
                                                                                         170
 In Situ Technologies
 August 1996	
29%
                 22%
                                 37%
                                               13%
                                                           184
 August 1998
                              22%
                                               11%
                                                               48%
                                                                             19%
                                                                                         233
 Groundwater Technologies
 August 1996	
40%
                 36%
                                 24%
                                                0%
                                                            45
 August 1998
                              31%
                                               14%
                                                               51%
                                                                              4%
                                                                                          75
 Note:  Source of August 1996 data was the Innovative Treatment Technologies: Annual Status Report (ASR) Eighth Edition
       (EPA-542-R-96-010). Data for August 1998 are derived from Records of Decision (RODs) for FY 1982-1997 and
       anticipated design and construction activities as of August 1998. Does not include data for the following technologies:
       incineration (offsite), mechanical soil aeration, neutralization, open burn/open detonation and solidification/
       stabilization (S/S) (Data for these technologies was not collected for ASR 8th edition). Includes 10 projects selected in
       RODs or ROD amendments for FY 1998. FY1998 data are not comprehensive.
CD
S
O
3
10
fD
03
<-t-

CD
13
CD
O
13
O.
O
eg
8?'
3"
CO
O
O
CD
O
O
-------
 8
                                Figure 13.  superfund Remedial Actions:
                       Project Status of Treatment Technologies as of August 1998
 o
CN
 i

Technology Predesign/
Design
Ex Situ Source Control Technologies
Solidification/Stabilization 28
Incineration (off site)
Thermal Desorption
Incineration (on site)
Bioremediation (ex situ)
Soil Washing
Neutralization
Solvent Extraction
Dechlorination
Chemical Treatment
Mechanical Soil Aeration
Vitrification
Open Burn/Open Detonation
SVE
Physical Separation
Rushing (in situ)
Cyanide Oxidation
Total
Percentage of Ex Situ Technologies
Percentage of All Source
Control Technologies
6
14
4
11
6
0
2
1
1
0
2
0
1
0
0
1
77
19%
11%
In Situ Source Control Technologies
SVE 35
Solidification/Stabilization
Bioremediation (in situ)
Flushing (in situ)
Thermally Enhanced Recovery
HotAirlniection
Phytoremediation
Surfactant Rushing
Thermal Desorption
Vitrification
Total
Percentage of In Situ Technologies
Percentage of All Source
Control Technologies
In Situ Groundwater Technologies
Air Sparging
Bioremediation (in situ)
Dual-Phase Extraction
Permeable Reactive Barrier
Chemical Treatment
Oxidation (in situ)
Well Aeration (in situ)
Total
Percentage of GroundwaterTechnologies
Percentage of All Technologies
15
9
5
0
1
0
1
0
0
66
24%
10%
9
5
4
3
1
0
1
23
31%
3%
Design Completed/ Operational
Being Installed
14
8
4
2
6
1
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
37
9%
6%
20
- 3
5
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
28
10%
4%
6
1
2
1
1
0
0
11
14%
1%
11
6
3
4
15
0
2
1
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
45
12%
7%
87
4
15
9
1
0
1
0
1
0
118
43%
18%
23
12
2
0
0
1
0
38
51%
5%
Completed
69
75
34
36
10
1
3
1
2
0
3
0
2
1
1
0
0
238
60%
35%
36
20
4
1
1
0
0
0
0
1
63
23%
9%
0
1
1
0
1
0
0
3
4%
<1%
Total ^H
122
95
55
46
42
8
5
5
4
3
3
2
2
2
1
1
1
397

59%
178
42
33
15
2
1
1
1
1
1
275

41%
38
19
9
4
3
1
1
75

10%
GRAND TOTAL 166 76 201 304 747
PERCENTAGE OF GRANDTOTAL 22% 10% 27% 41%
Note: Data are derived from Records of Decision (RODs) for FY 1982-1997 and anticipated design and construction
activities as of August 1998. Includes 13 projects selected in RODs or ROD amendments for FY 1998. FY 1998
data are not comprehensive.
(21
-------
    contaminants treated, cleanup goals, operating
    parameters (such as retention time and additives),
    materials handling required, and management of
    residuals.

    Contaminants Addressed
    The data collected for this report form the basis for
    an analysis of the classes of contaminants treated by
    each technology type at remedial action sites. Figure
    14 provides that information, by technology, for
    seven major groups  of contaminants: halogenated
    volatile organic compounds (VOC), benzene,
    toluene, ethylbenzene, and xylene (BTEX), other
    VOCs,  polychlorinated  biphenyls  (PCB),
    polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons (PAH), other
    semivolatile organic compounds (SVOC), and
    metals. For this report, compounds are categorized
    as halogenated VOCs,  SVOCs, or PAHs according
    to the lists provided in EPA's SW-846 test methods
    8010, 8270, and 8310. Overall, more than three-
    quarters of the Superfund remedial projects address
    organics  alone.  Alternatives to  treat  metals are
    limited; only one-fifth of all projects address metals
    alone or in combination with organics. The EPA
    REACH IT on-line searchable database contains
    information about specific contaminants treated at
                                        Selecting a treatment technology for a contaminant
                                        often depends  on its physical  and chemical
                                        properties. For example, VOCs are amenable to
                                        treatment by certain  technologies such as SVE
                                        because of their volatility.  In other cases, metals,
                                        which are not volatile and do not degrade, are not
                                        amenable for  treatment  by SVE,  thermal
                                        desorption, or bioremediation. However, because
                                        metals readily form insoluble compounds when
                                        combined with appropriate additives, such as
                                        Portland cement,  solidification/stabilization is
                                        most  often used  for  treatment  of  these
                                        contaminants.
                                        As shown in Figure 14,  halogenated volatiles are
                                        being treated most  often  by SVE.  BTEX or PAH
                                        components are being treated most  often by
                                        bioremediation.  PCBs and other SVOCs are being
                                        treated most often by incineration. Metals are being
                                        treated almost  exclusively  by solidification/
                                        stabilization, with a few soil washing and flushing
                                        (in situ) projects.

                                        Quantity of Soil Addressed
                                        EPA analyzed the quantity of soil addressed by the
                                        various treatment technologies.   Data on the
                                        quantity of media treated are available for 447 sites
    each site where a treatment technology is being used.
                           Figure 14.  Superfund Remedial Actions:
                          Contaminants Treated by Technology Type
           180

           160

           140

           120
Number of
Applications
           100
            80
                  • Soil Vapor Extraction
                  H Solidification/Stabilization
                  K Incineration
                  H Bioremediation
                  • Thermal Desorption
                  • Flushing (in situ)
                  a Soil Washing
                Halogenated
                VOCs
                  BTEX    Other VOCs   PCBs       PAHs
                                 Contaminant Group
Other SVOCs    Metals
    Note:
Data are derived frorn Records of Decision (RODs) for FY 1982—1997 and anticipated design and
construction activities as of August 1998, Includes 13 projects selected in RODs or ROD amendments for
FY 1998.  FY 1998 data are not comprehensive.
                                          to
                                          s
                                          o'
                                          3
                                          IO
                                          i
                                          CD
                                          9-
                                          g_
                                          o
                                          CD'
                                          en
                                          CO
                                          O
                                          8
                                          o
                                          o
-------
 o
 o
                        F/gwre f 5.  Superfund Remedial Actions:  Estimated Quantities of soil to Be
                                            Treated by source  control Technologies
 o
 I
-------
  that data, skewed the average for that technology by
  more than 400 percent.
  Figure 16 is a box plot of the volume of soil treated
  by individual technologies.  Presentation of data
  in the box plot format is  useful because it shows
  how the data are  distributed by displaying  the
  median  (average value for all projects), 25th, and
  75th percentiles as well as the largest and smallest
  nonoutlier values.  Oudiers and extreme values  can
  also be displayed.  The 25th percentiles represents
  the value at which 25 percent of the cases have smaller
  values and 75 percent have larger values.  The 75th
  percentile represents the value at which 25 percent
  of die cases have larger values and 75 percent have
  smaller values. With a box plot, the 25th and 75th
  percentiles, are shown as die ends of die box. The
  largest and smallest nonoudier values are shown by
  lines diat extend from the ends of the box.  Oudiers
  represent values that are between one-and-a-half and
  three box  lengths from the top or bottom  of  the
  box.  Extreme values, which are values greater than
  three box  lengths from the top or bottom  of  the
  box,  are not shown on Figure 16.
  As shown  in  Figure 16, the median value for  the
  volume  of soil per  project for all technologies was
  below 50,000 cy.   This value indicates that for at
                                          least 50 percent of the sites being addressed by
                                          treatment technologies, the volume of soil treated
                                          is 50,000 cy or less. However, the range of values
                                          as  shown  by the length of the box and whiskers
                                          for SVE and bioremediation (in situ) was much
                                          greater than those for all other technologies.  The
                                          75th percentile value for SVE and bioremediation
                                          (in situ) is above 100,000 cy, indicating that the
                                          volume being treated by these technologies
                                          exceeded 100,000 cy for 25 percent of the projects
                                          for which  data were available.  In contrast the
                                          median and range for the volumes of soil treated
                                          by  other technologies, such  as  solidification/
                                          stabilization (both in situ and ex situ), incineration
                                          (both on site and off  site), thermal desorption,
                                          and bioremediation (ex situ), are  much smaller
                                          than for either SVE or bioremediation  (in situ).
                                          The box plot reaffirms the assertion that in situ
                                          technologies are typically used to treat larger sites.
                                          As  shown  in Figure 16,  the median  value for
                                          volume of soil per project for solidification/
                                          stabilization (both  in situ  and  ex  situ),
                                          incineration  (both on  site and off site), thermal
                                          desorption, and bioremediation  (ex situ) was
                                          below 30,000 cy.   The  largest range in soil
                                          volumes for these  technologies was for projects
                         Figure 16.  Superfund Remedial Actions:
                           Average Soil  volumes  by Technology
          350,000

          300,000

          250,000

          200,000
Volume
          100,000
           50,000
                      -e-
                 N =  124
                    Soil Vapor
                    Extraction
                   Bioreme-
                    diation
                    (in situ)
Solidification/
Stabilization
  (in situ)
   36
Incineration
 (on site)
   47
 Thermal
Desorption
Solidification/
Stabilization
  (ex situ)
Bioreme-
 diation
(ex situ)
   49
Incineration
 (off site)
                                                   Technology
  Note:
Extreme values (three box lengths from the top or bottom of box) are not included.  Outliers are shown as
circles.  N equals the number of data points. Data are derived from Records of Decision (RODs) for FY
1982—1997 and anticipated design and construction activities as of August 1998.
                                                                               in
                                                                               O>
                                                                               O
                                                                               ft;
                                                                               O
                                                                               CD
                                                                               CD
                                                                               e-h

                                                                               CD
                                                                               CD
                                                                               O

                                                                               g.
                                                                               O
                                                                               
-------
fi
§
I
I
s>
O>
£
O

I
-------
       New Information on Established
       Technologies
       As mentioned earlier, this year's report includes
       updated  data on incineration  (off  site),
       solidification/stabilization, MSA, OB/OD, and
       neutralization  projects.   Information on these
       established technologies for ASR versions prior
       to this ninth edition was based on a review of
       RODs rather than on interviews with regional or
       state staff.  Therefore, the only information for
       sites using these established technologies was the
       name of the site and the year the ROD was signed.
       Previous versions of the ASR did not reflect any
       changes in the remedy that may have occurred
       during the design  phase of the cleanup and did
       not report on the implementation status of these
       established  technology projects. The eighth
       edition of the ASR did  update the data for
       incineration  (on site) projects.  This ninth edition
       of the report updates the data  for incineration
       (off site), solidification/stabilization, MSA, OB/
       OD,  and neutralization to  make the report
       comprehensive in  terms of all treatment  (both
       established and innovative) technologies as well as
       any remedy changes that have occurred throughout
                                            the remedial process during the previous years.
                                            Figure  18 shows  the site types treated by
                                            solidification/stabilization  projects.  Surface
                                            impoundments/lagoons, metal ore smelting/
                                            recycling, manufacturing process,  and waste
                                            disposal/management sites are most frequently
                                            addressed by solidification/stabilization.
                                            Additional new information in this report includes
                                            data on the volume of contaminated media treated
                                            by incineration  (off site) and  solidification/
                                            stabilization.  As mentioned earlier, Figure 15
                                            indicates that the average volume of soil treated
                                            per project was significantly lower for incineration
                                            (off  site) (approximately  4,000 cy) versus
                                            incineration (on site)(approximately 48,000  cy).
                                            The difference in  average volume treated is most
                                            likely related to cost. Incineration  (off site) is  cost-
                                            effective only for small volumes of contaminated soil
                                            because of the cost of transporting waste off-site.
                                            For solidification/stabilization projects, the volume
                                            of soil treated was roughly the same regardless of
                                            whether the technology was applied in situ or ex
                                            situ.   The data  collected for solidification/
                                            stabilization projects also indicate that most projects
                               Figure 18.  Superfund Remedial Actions:
                               Site Types for Solidification/Stabilization
Number of
Projects
                                       Total Number of Projects = 164
            Surface
            Impound
             merit/
            Lagoon
      Metal Ore  Manufac-  Waste  Industrial/   Battery  Petroleum   Wood   Organic  Electro- Munitions  Pesticide
      Smelting/   turing  Disposal/ Municipal  Recycling/  Refining Preserving Chemical plating Manufac-  Manufac-
                      ""	   Landfills  Disposal  and Reuse          Formula         turing/  turing/Use/
                                                               tion/Use         Storage   Storage
Reclama-
  tion/
Recycling
Process  Manage-
        ment
                                                 Site Type
     Note:
Data are derived from Records of Decision (RODs) for FY 1982-1997 and anticipated design and
construction activities as of August 1998. Includes three projects selected in RODs or ROD Amendments for FY
1998. FY 1998 data are not comprehensive.  Does not include instances in which the number of projects
with the same type was less than six.  Projects can have more than one site type.
                                                                                                       CD
                                                                                                       O
                                                                                                       o

                                                                                                       K>

                                                                                                       CD
                                                                                                       c-h

                                                                                                       CD
                                                                                                       c-t-

                                                                                                       O
                                                                                                       3
                                                                                                       O.
                                                                                                       o
                                                                                                       CD"
                                                                                                       to
                                                                                                       31
                                                                                                       CO
                                                                                                       o
                                                                                                       c:
                                                                                                       —5
                                                                                                       O
                                                                                                       CD
                                                                                                       O
                                                                                                       O
-------
8
8
£
1
o
I
s
o
used inorganic binders, primarily Pordand cement
to solidify and stabilize die waste.

Remedy Changes
As indicated in Section I, remedies selected for
Superfund remedial actions are  documented
through a ROD. When a remedy is changed,
the change can be documented through a second
ROD, a ROD amendment, or an BSD. A ROD
amendment  can also be used to add  a  new
remedy.  In some cases, a decision document is
not necessary to document a change if the new
remedy was included in die original ROD as a
contingency. Remedy changes often occur during
the predesign or design phase of a project when
new information about site characteristics are
discovered or treatability studies for the selected
technologies are completed.
Appendix D provides a list of sites tracked by this
series of annual reports where remedy changes have
occurred.  For each remedy change, Appendix D
documents the original remedy, the new or
alternative remedy selected, the primary reasons
for the change, and the decision document, if any,
used to document the change. The  appendix only
lists a change in treatment technologies tracked
by the nine editions of this report.  It is not a
comprehensive list of changes in Superfund RODs.
This report documents approximately 248  (235
source control and 13 groundwater)  projects where
remedy changes or deletions involving treatment
technologies have occurred. In other words, those
treatment technology selected originally was no longer
the appropriate remedy for that site. For some projects
the new remedy or alternative selected was an
innovative or established technology, or containment,
including capping, or excavation and off-site disposal.
For some projects, the alternative  had not been
determined.
Those 248 projects do not include 24 projects under
which anodier treatment technology  was added at a
site.  In a number of cases,  another  technology was
added to an existing technology, either to enhance the
original technology or to treat another area of the site.
Figure 19  shows the percent of projects tracked by
this report that are continuing with  the original
remedy versus the percentage of projects that have
experienced a remedy change. Overall,  die 248 projects
where die remedy has changed represent approximately
26 percent of all treatment  technologies tracked by
this report. Consequendy, for the majority of projects
(74 percent), the remedy has remained unchanged.
As indicated, Appendix D provides  the primary
reasons cited for a remedy  change.  In some cases,
reasons related to the technology such as the cost or
performance were cited. In other cases, the change
was made for other reasons that were not attributable
to the technology such as revised cleanup goals or
changes in conditions at the site such as contaminants
at the site that were naturally attenuating.
Figure 19  shows the percentage of projects in which
the reason cited was attributable to  the technology
versus the percentage of projects  experiencing a
change for reasons other than the technology. As
                      responsible for the site determined that the
                                             Figure 19.  Superfund Remedial Actions:
                                                  Projects with a Remedy Change
                         Treatment
                Technology Projects
                       With Original
                       Remedy 74%
                                                                  Treatment Technology
                                                                  Projects With a Change
                                                                  Attributable to the
                                                                  Technology 13%
                                                                                       Treatment Technology —
                                                                                       Projects With a Change
                                                                                       Due to Reasons Other
                                                                                       Than the Technology 13%
                                           Projects
                                           With
                                          - Remedy
                                           Change
                                           26%
                    Note:  Data are derived from Records of Decision (RODs) for FY1982-1997 that selected treatment technologies for
                          source control and innovative technologies for groundwater and anticipated design and construction activities as of
                          August 1998.  Includes 13 projects selected in RODs or ROD amendments for FY 1998. FY 1998 data are not
                          comprehensive.  Does not include RODs selecting pump-and-treat or other aboveground treatment for groundwater.
-------
       shown in. Figure 19 for approximately half of the
       projects experiencing a remedy change, the change
       was due to problems with the original treatment
       technology such as an inability to meet treatment
       goals.
       During the effort  to update information on
       incineration  (off site)  and  solidification/
       stabilization projects that were selected in RODs
       dating back to FY 1982, a large number of remedy
       changes involving these projects were discovered
       and are documented in this report.
       Figures 20 through 22 compare the number of
       RODs in which incineration,  solidification/
       stabilization, or bioremediation was  selected and
       the actual number of such projects implemented
       respectively from FY 1982 through FY 1997.  The
       differences between  the number selected and the
       number implemented is the result of changes in
       the remedy that occurred during the  remedial
       process.  For most years, as the figures show, the
       number of incineration, solidification/stabilization,
       and bioremediation  technologies  implemented is
       slighdy less than the  number selected in RODs for
       most years. The gap between incineration projects
       selected and those implemented  (Figure 20) is
       greatest for FY  1989 through FY  1991.  For
       solidification/stabilization technologies (Figure 21)
                                          the widest gap occurred over a longer time frame,
                                          from FY 1988 through FY  1993.  In both cases,
                                          the years showing the largest gaps are years in which
                                          incineration and solidification/stabilization were
                                          selected in RODs most often. However, the gaps
                                          between die number of times the technologies were
                                          selected  and the number  of times they were
                                          implemented generally decreased  after 1994,
                                          coinciding with an overall decrease in the number
                                          of projects for which these technologies were
                                          selected. The decreased gaps  may have a number of
                                          causes.  For example, in the years in which the
                                          greatest differences were observed (FY 1988 through
                                          FY 1993), many innovative treatment technologies
                                          were relatively untried or unavailable. Therefore,
                                          incineration and solidification/stabilization were the
                                          two primary conventional treatment options
                                          available  to site managers.   As  knowledge of the
                                          capabilities of other remedial options became more
                                          widespread, project managers re-evaluated initial
                                          remedy selections, adjusting them on the basis of
                                          new information. Containment or off-site disposal
                                          were  the most  frequent  substitutes for the
                                          technologies originally selected, although thermal
                                          desorption, SVE, and other treatment technologies
                                          also were selected.  (Appendix D of this report
                                          provides a table that lists the projects for which
                                          technologies were changed).
                             Figure 20.  superfund Remedial Actions:
                                 Changes In Incineration Remedies
           25
           20--
            15.—
slumber of
Applications
            10—
   - - n - - Incineration (off site) - Selected
     A   Incineration (off site) - Implemented
   --a-- Incineration (on site) - Selected
   —A— Incineration (on site) - Implemented
                   83    84    85    86   87
88    89    90   91
     Fiscal Year
                                                          92    93   94    95    96   97
      Note:
Data are derived from Records of Decision (RODs) for FY 1982—1997 and anticipated design and
construction activities as of August 1998.  The differences between the number selected and the number
implemented is the result of changes in the remedy that occurred during the remedial process. Includes
remedies that have been added or dropped.
                                                                       a>
                                                                       o
                                                                       CD
                                                                       e-t-

                                                                       CD
                                                                       CD
                                                                       O

                                                                       O.
                                                                       O
                                                                       CO
                                                                       CD"
                                                                       CO
                                                                       -h
                                                                       O
                                                                       CO
                                                                       o
                                                                       O
                                                                       CD
                                                                       O
                                                                       O
-------
8
|
I
 o>
 5
 o
 c
 H-
 4->
IN
 o
                      For most years, the difference between the number
                      of bioremediation projects selected and the number
                      actually implemented is relatively small (Figure 22),
                      even though the number of bioremediation projects
                      selected increased steadily from FY 1988 through
                      FY 1996.  Half of the time, the number  of
                                               bioremediation projects implemented was equal to
                                               or greater than  the number selected.  The gap
                                               between the number of times the technology was
                                               selected and the number of times it was implemented
                                               widened after 1994, but the gap  remained fewer
                                               than two to four projects.
                       Figure 21.  Superfund Remedial Actions:
                  Changes In Solidification/Stabilization Remedies
           40
                                  35--
                - -n-- Solidification/Stabilization - Selected
                —&— Solidification/Stabilization - Implemented
                      Number of
                      Applications

                                   82    83    84   85   86   87   88
                                                                                      92
                                                                                                 94    95    96  97
                                                 89   90   91
                                                 Fiscal Year
Note:    Data are derived from Records of Decision (RODs) for FY 1982-1997 and anticipated design and
        construction activities as of August 1998. The differences between the number selected and the number
        implemented is the result of changes in the remedy that occurred during the remedial process.  Includes
        remedies that have been added or dropped.
                       Figure 22.  Superfund Remedial Actions:
                         Changes In  Bioremediation Remedies
                                 20
                                 18f

                                 16
                                 14 —
                      Number of  12
                      Applications
                                 10
                - -n- - Bioremediation - Selected
                —&— Bioremediation - Implemented
                                    82    83   84   85
                                                        86
                                                             87   88
                      Note:
                                                 89    90   91    92   93   94   95   96   97
                                                 Fiscal Year
        Data are derived from Records of Decision (RODs) for FY 1982-1997 and anticipated design and
        construction activities as of August 1998.  The differences between the number selected and the number
        implemented is the result-of-changes in the remedy that occurred during the remedial process.  Includes
        remedies that have been added or dropped.
-------
 Section 3: Innovative
 Applications
This  section  discusses innovative  treatment
technologies.  In  the Foreword,  innovative
technologies were defined as treatment technologies
whose use is inhibited by lack of data on cost or
performance.  For the first time, SVE and thermal
desorption, formerly defined as innovative, are now
categorized as established in  this report.  The eighth
edition of the ASR, published in 1996, considered
SVE and thermal desorption as transitional because
of the large  number of applications of those
technologies.  They have been reclassified in this
report as established because several reports and case
studies have been published documenting the cost
and performance of both  SVE and thermal
desorption.  Figure 23 lists the technologies that
were categorized as innovative and established in
the eighth edition ASR (1996) versus those in this
report.  The Federal Remediation Technologies
Roundtable (FRTR) has published 140 case studies
on a wide range of treatment technologies which are
now available for viewing on-line or downloading
from the FRTR web site at http://www.frtr.gov.
Of these,  27 pertain to SVE and 12 pertain to
(N
1
o"
!D
                      Figure 23. superfund Remedial Actions:
     Technologies Listed as Innovative and Established In 1996 versus 1998
   ASR 8th Edition 1996
  Innovative Source Control Technologies
  ASR 9th Edition 1998
Bioremediation (ex situ) - Biopile
Bioremediation (ex situ) - Composting
Bioremediation (ex situ) - Land Treatment
Bioremediation (ex situ) - Other
Bioremediation (ex situ) - Slurry-Phase
Bioremediation (ex situ) - Solid-Phase
Bioremediation (in situ) - Bioventing
Bioremediation (in situ) - Lagoon
Bioremediation (in situ) - Other
Chemical Treatment
Contained Recovery of Oily Wastes (CROW)
Cyanide Oxidation
Dechlorination
Flushing (in situ)
Hot Air Injection
Physical Separation

Plasma High Temperature Recovery
SVE
Soil Washing
Solvent Extraction
Bioremediation (ex situ) - Composting
Bioremediation (ex situ) - Land Treatment
Bioremediation (ex situ) - Other
Bioremediation (ex situ) - Slurry-Phase
Bioremediation (ex situ) - Solid-Phase
Bioremediation (in situ) - Bioventing
Bioremediation (in situ) - Lagoon
Bioremediation (in situ) - Other
Chemical Treatment
Changed to: Thermally Enhanced Recovery
Cyanide Oxidation
Dechlorination
Flushing (in situ)
Hot Air Injection
Physical Separation
Phytoremediation
Remedy no longer being implemented
Now Classified as Established
Soil Washing
Solvent Extraction
Surfactant Flushing
Thermal Desorption
Vitrification
Established Source Control Technologies
Incineration (off site)
Incineration (on site)
Mechanical Soil Aeration
Neutralization
Open Burn/Open Detonation

Solidification/Stabilization
Now Classified as Established
Vitrification
Incineration (off site)
Incineration (on site)
Mechanical Soil Aeration
Neutralization
Open Burn/Open Detonation
SVE
Solidification/Stabilization
Thermal Desorption
  In Situ Groundwater Technologies
    Air Sparging	
   In Situ Air Stripping (Air Sparging)
                                                  Bioremediation (in situ) - Bioslurping
                                                  Bioremediation (in situ) - Biosparging
    Bioremediation (in situ) - Groundwater
   Bioremediation (in situ) - Groundwater
    Dual-Phase Extraction
                                                  Dual-Phase Extraction
    Oxidation (in situ)
   Oxidation (in situ)
    Passive Treatment Wall
   Changed to: Permeable Reactive Barrier
    Well Aeration (in situ)
   Well Aeration (in situ)
-------
 I
 I
 C
 
-------
As sfiown in Figure 24, innovative technologies
represent  approximately 18  percent of all
technologies for source control.  Bioremediation
comprises  most of the innovative technology
applications (75).  Other innovative technologies
include flushing (in situ), phytoremediation, soil
washing, solvent extraction, and vitrification.

Bioremediation
Contaminants treated by bioremediation are shown
in Figure 25. The contaminants treated most often
           are BTEX compounds;  PAHs are the SVOCs
           addressed most frequently; and halogenated VOCs
           are being treated at 43 sites.  Currently, 75 projects
           are implementing various  forms of bioremediation
           for source control. Figure 26 illustrates the types
           of bioremediation for source control.   Land
           treatment is  the most  common form of ex situ
           bioremediation with 29 projects, followed by
           composting (six projects).  Based on available data,
           bioventing has been specified for 19 of the 33 in
           situ soil bioremediation remedies.
                       Figure 25.  Superfund Remedial Actions:
                      Contaminants Treated by Bioremediation*
Number of
Applications
              10
                      BTEX
PAHs      Halogenated
              VOCs
        Contaminant Group
 Other
SVOCs
Other
VOCs
     *   Includes in situ groundwater technologies
 Note:   At some sites, treatment is for more than one contaminant. Treatment may be planned, ongoing, or
        completed.
        Data are derived from Records of Decision (RODs) for FY1982—1997 and anticipated design and
        construction activities as of August 1998. Includes six projects selected in RODs or ROD amendments for
        FY 1998. FY 1998 data are not comprehensive.
                                            o
                                            3
                                            CM
                                                                         8
                                                                         rt;
                                                                         o"
-------
                              Figure 26.  Superfund Remedial Actions:
                            Bloremedlatlon Methods for Source Control
         Biopile (1) 1%

        In Situ Lagoon
       Aeration (3) 4%

     Slurry Phase Tank
      Treatment (3) 4%

Excavation with On-site
       Treatment to be
    Determined (4) 5%
           Composting (6) 8%
                                                                            Land Treatment (29) 39%
                                                                            Bioventing (19) 25%
                                                     In Situ Soil Treatment (11) 14%
       Note:    Data are derived from Records of Decision (RODs) for FY1982—1997 and anticipated design and
               construction activities as of August 1998. Includes four projects selected in RODs or ROD amendments for
               FY 1998.  FY 1998 data are not comprehensive.
       Treatment Trains
       In some cases, several innovative and established
       technologies may be used together in treatment
       trains, which are either integrated processes or a
       series of treatments that are combined in sequence
       to provide the necessary treatment.  Seventeen
       remedial sites  use  treatment trains for source
       control.
       Figure 27 identifies specific treatment trains used
       in remedial actions.  Appendix  C provides the
       names of sites that use  treatment  trains.
       Innovative treatment technologies may be used
       with established  technologies  or with other
       innovative technologies. The  most common
       treatment trains are dechlorination preceded by
       thermal desorption, soil washing followed by
aboveground bioremediation (usually slurry-phase
treatment) and bioremediation followed by
solidification/stabilization. Technologies may be
combined to reduce the volume of material that
requires further treatment; to prevent the emission
of volatile contaminants during excavation and
mixing; or to treat multiple contaminants in  a
single medium.
This year's report documents 17 treatment trains
involving innovative technologies. This number
is down from 32  treatment  trains documented
in the ASR eighth edition.  The decrease was
the result of classifying SVE and  thermal
desorption as established technologies, as well
as some technologies that have been changed or
cancelled.
-------
                        Figure 27.  Superfund Remedial Actions:
             Treatment Trains  with Innovative Treatment Technologies


                                       Total Treatment Trains = 17
                                                              Thermal      Solidification/
                                                             Desorption     Stabilization
                                                               (1 site)        (1 site)
Bioremediation
   (ex situ)
   (2 sites!
                                                                             o
                                                                             a
                                                                             o

                                                                             CM
                                                                                                                        13
                                                                                                                        Z3
                                                                                                                        O
                                                                                                                        T3
                                                                                                                        o
                                                                                                                        CO
                                        Solidification/   Incineration
                                        Stabilization    (off site)     Vitrification
                                   followed   (1site)       (1site)       (1site)
                                           Solidification/Stabilization

                                   followed           (3sites)
                                    fiy
                                        Bioremediation
                                          (in situ)
                                   followed  (1 site)
                                        Incineration
                                         (off site)
                                  followed   (1 Site)
Note:   Data are derived from Records of Decision (RODs) for FY 1982—1997 and anticipated design and

        construction activities as of August 1998.  Includes one project selected in a. ROD amendment for FY

        1998.  FY 1998 data are not comprehensive.
-------
Ki
D)
JO
O

I

I
•o
I
o
1
  Section 4: Groundwater
  Technologies
Groundwater  treatment remedies include
conventional pump-and-treat and in situ treatment,
or a combination of both.  Figure 28 shows the
overall types of groundwater treatment remedies
selected.  Groundwater treatment remedies have
been selected for 663 sites.  Of these, 588 sites
are implementing pump-and-treat systems alone,
and 39 sites are using pump-and-treat systems and
in situ treatment, either for the same area of the
site or for different areas.  In situ treatment alone
has been selected as a single remedy at 36 sites to
treat groundwater contamination.  For some of
these  sites,  it is possible that pump-and-treat is
being conducted at another part of the site.
Figure 29  lists the specific types of in situ
treatments selected.  More  detail  on  their
implementation status is in Figure 13 (see p. 16).
EPA has selected in situ treatment of groundwater
75  times at 65 remedial sites.  EPA selected in
situ treatment of "groundwater for more than 26
remedial sites in FY 1996 and FY 1997.  More
than half of these projects are in the operational
phase.  Completion of these projects is expected
to require 5 to 20 years.  The EPA REACH IT
on-line searchable database provides more detailed
information for each in situ  groundwater
application at Superfund remedial action sites.
Appendix A lists the number of in situ groundwater
treatment technologies selected each year. The
summary matrix in Appendix B  provides site
names, technologies, and project status.
Figure 30 indicates the types of sites addressed by
air sparging.  Vehicle maintenance/fuel lines/
storage/spills and manufacturing process sites are
most frequently addressed by this technology.
Contaminants treated by air sparging are  shown
in Figure 31.  Halogenated VOCs are the
contaminants treated most frequently.
In recent years, an increasing  number of RODs
have specified natural attenuation as a remedy for
groundwater contamination.
Figure 32 shows the number of RODs that selected
natural attenuation for groundwater at Superfund
                                          Figure 28.  Superfund Remedial Actions-.
                                      Groundwater Remedies Through Fiscal Year 1997
                        Total Sites with Groundwater Treatment Remedies = 663
                                  Sites with In Situ
                            Treatment Only (36) 5%
                                                          Sites with Pump-and-Treat
                                                          Remedy and In Situ
                                                          Treatment (39) 6%
                                                                              Sites with Pump-and-Treat
                                                                              Remedy Only (588) 89%
                   Note:   Pump-and-treat remedy data based on Records of Decision (RODs) for FY 1982-1997; in situ
                          treatment data, based on anticipated design and construction activities as of August 1998.  Includes four
                          projects selected in RODs or ROD amendments for FY 1998. FY 1998 data are not comprehensive.
                   Source: U.S. EPA Office of Emergency and Remedial Response, 1998.  FY 1996 and 1997 data are preliminary.
-------
    remedial action sites.  As shown in the figure, the
    selection  of natural attenuation has steadily
    increased since  FY 1985.   EPA's Office of
    Emergency  and  Remedial Response (OERR)
    analyzed  FY 1982 through FY 1994 RODs
    selecting natural attenuation. The analysis revealed
    that the most common reason cited for selecting
                                         natural attenuation was low  or decreasing
                                         contaminant concentrations at the site.  The
                                         analysis also indicated that the  most prevalent
                                         contaminant found at these sites was VOCs.
                                         EPA recently finalized guidelines on the use of
                                         natural attenuation to remediate groundwater. Use
     Technology
     Air Sparging
                            Figure 29.  Superfund Remedial Actions:
                        in  situ Groundwater Treatment Technologies
                                             Number of Projects Selected
                                                         38
     Bioremediation (in situ) - Groundwater
                                                         16
     Dual-Phase Extraction
                                                       fD
                                                       O
                                                       O
                                                                                                                    13
                                                                                                                    Q.
                                                       CD
                                                       O

                                                       O.
                                                       O
                                                       CD"
                                                       C/5
     Permeable Reactive Barrier
     Chemical treatment
     Bioremediation (in situ) - Biosparging
     Bioremediation (in situ) - Bioslurping
     Oxidation (in situ)
     Well Aeration (in situ)
     TOTAL                                                        75
     Note:    Data are derived from Records of Decision (RODs) for FY 1982-1997 and anticipated design and
             construction activities as of August 1998.
                           Figure 30.  Superfund Remedial Actions:
                          Types of Sites Addressed by Air Sparging
Number of
Projects
                                        Total Number of Projects = 38
                Vehicle    Manufac-  Disposal
              Maintenance/   turing     Area/
               Fuel Lines/   Process   Dumping
              Storage/Spills
                                  Fire/   Petroleum  Above-
                                 Crash   Refining   ground
                                 Training     and
                                  Area     Reuse
                                    Site Type
Storage  turing/Use
 Tank    /Storage
Pesticide  Industrial  Solvent
Manufac-  Landfills Recovery/
                 Chemical
                Reclamation
    Note:
Data are derived from Records of Decision (RODs) for FY 1982—1997 and anticipated design and
construction activities as of August 1998. Includes one project selected in a ROD amendment for FY
1998. FY 1998 data are not comprehensive.  Projects can have more than one site type. Does not
include instances in which the same site types was less than three.
-------
•o

I
O
o
                   of Monitored Natural Attenuation at Superfund,
                   RCRA Corrective Action, and Underground
                   Storage Tank Sites, OSWER Directive Number
                   9200.4-17 is available by calling 800-424-9346 or
                                             703-412-9810, or on the Internet at http://
                                             www.epa.gov/swerustl/directiv/d9200417.htm.
                                             Appendix E lists the sites selecting natural
                                             attenuation.
                                         Figure 31. Superfund Remedial Actions:
                                          Contaminants Treated by Air Sparging
                   Number of
                    Projects  15	
                                  Halogenated
                                     VOCs
                                 BTEX      Other SVOCs
                                       Contaminant Groups
PAHs
Other VOCs
Note:
                          Data are derived from Records of Decision (RODs) for FY 1982—1997 and anticipated design and
                          construction activities as of August 1998. Includes one project selected in a ROD amendment for FY 1998.
                          FY 1998 data are not comprehensive. There may be more than one contaminant group per project.
                                          Figure 32.  Superfund Remedial Actions:
                                     Natural Attenuation for Groundwater by Fiscal Year
                  25
                                               Total Number of Projects = 131
         Number
            of
          RODs
                    82    83   84   85    86   87    88   89   90   91    92    93   94   95   96   97
                                                            Fiscal Year
                   Source:  U.S. EPA Office of Emergency and Remedial Response, 1998.  FY 1996 and 1997 data, are preliminary.
-------
  Section 5: Superf und
  Removal Actions
Removal actions are usually conducted in response
to a more immediate threat caused by a release of
hazardous substances than threats addressed by
remedial actions.  Approximately 5,500 removal
actions have been undertaken to address these
more immediate threats. To date, innovative
treatment technologies have been used in relatively
few removal actions.  The treatment technologies
addressed in this report have been used 97 times
in 54 removal actions (Figure 33).  The eighth
edition of the ASR documented only 33 removal
actions using innovative technologies.  The
increase in removal actions documented in  this
report is primarily  the result  of a  more
comprehensive effort to collect data.
Figure 33 indicates that  54  percent of removal
projects that involve treatment technologies have
been completed.  Since removal actions are
responses to  an immediate threat,  and often
involve smaller quantities of hazardous wastes than
remedial activities, the implementation of the
technology may progress faster at a removal site than
at a remedial site.
As removal actions involve smaller quantities of
waste or immediate threats, they require quick
action to alleviate the  hazard.  Often, such
activities do  not lend themselves  to on-site
treatment or innovative technologies. In addition,
SARA does not establish the same preference for
innovative treatment for removals as it sets forth
for remedial actions.
The EPA REACH IT on-line searchable database
provides more  detailed information for each
application of an innovative technology at a
removal site.  The summary matrix in Appendix
B  lists  each removal site  and   treatment
technology.
 a>
                                                                                                          o
                                                                                                          3
 CO
 £1
 •a
 CD
 =?,
 TO
 CD
 £
.o
'13
                       Figure 33. Superfund Removal Actions:
           Project status of Treatment Technologies as of August 1998

Predesign/
Technology

Source Control Technologies
SVE
Bioremediation (in situ)
Bioremediation (ex situ)
Thermal Desorption
Chemical Treatment
Soil Washing
Dechlorination
Solvent Extraction
Vitrification
TOTAL
In Situ Groundwater Technologies
Air Sparging
Bioremediation (in situ)
Bioremediation (in situ)-Bioslurping
Bioremediation (in situ)-Biosparging
TOTAL
Design


1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1 (1%)

0
0
0
0
0 (0%)
Design Complete/
Not Installed/Being
Installed/ Installed

3
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
5 (6%)

2
0
0
1
3 (43%)

Operational


15
18
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
35 (39%)

1
1
1
0
3 (43%)

Completed


10
6
13
6
5
3
2
2
2
49 (54%)

1
0
0
0
1 (14%)

Total


29
26
15
6
5
3
2
2
2
90

4
1
1
1
7
       Data based on interviews conducted in FY1988 with EPA Superfimd Removal Branch Chiefs and On-
       Scene Coordinators for each region and anticipated design and construction activities as of August 1998.
-------
 2
 I
 to
 tn
 O
  Section 6: Actions linger
  Other Federal Programs
Innovative technologies also are being conducted
under federal programs other than Superfund.
Many of those projects are conducted at DoD
and  DOE facilities.  These  projects were
identified through various sources of information,
including discussions with DoD and DOE
personnel, and should  not be considered
exhaustive.  The RCRA corrective action sites
using an innovative technology were identified
through the review of SBs, which are decision
documents prepared for some actions at corrective
action sites.  Because innovative  technologies
likely have been used at other RCRA sites, but
not documented in statements of basis (SBs), the
list in this report should not be considered
complete.  Figure 34 summarizes  the types of
innovative treatment technologies and the
number of projects,  and indicates  the status of
each. The summary matrix in Appendix B lists
the name of each site, the technology selected,
and the status of the project. The EPA REACH
IT on-line searchable database provides more
detailed information for each application.
(0
1
                Figure 34.  Sample Projects Under Other Federal
                     and RCRA Corrective Action Programs:
              status of Treatment Technologies as of August 1998

Technology
Other Federal Programs
Bloremediation (in situ)*
SVE
Bioremediation (ex situ)
Thermal Desorption
Air Sparging
Vitrification
Incineration (off site)
Soil Washing
Dual-Phase Extraction
Flushing (in situ)
Well Aeration
Dechlorination
TOTAL
RCRA Corrective Action
SVE
Bioremediation (in situ)*
Bioremediation (ex situ)
Air Sparging
Thermal Desorption
Well aeration (in situ)
Predesign/ Design Complete/
Design Not Installed/Being Operational Completed Total
Installed/Installed
1
1
1
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
1
0
5 (7%)
1
0
1
0
0
0
2
3
1
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
7 (10%)
1
2
0
0
1
0
11
8
3
1
1
2
0
0
1
0
0
0
27 (37%)
7
0
0
1
0
1
5
6
9
4
2
2
1
2
0
1
0
1
33
0
0
0
0
0
0
TOTAL 2 (13%) 4 (27%) 9 (60%) 0
Note: Data based on interviews conducted in FY 1988 with EPA RCRA Corrective Action, DoD,
contact fir each site, and anticipated design and construction activities as of August 1998.
19
18
14
5
4
4
2
2
1
1
1
i
(46%) 72
9
2
1
1
1
1
(0%) 15
and DOE points oj
-------
        APPENDIX A
        SUPERFUND TREATMENT TECHNOLOGIES
        BY FISCAL YEAR
 V
M ' " " *
4S
                         ttf
-------
-------
Superfund Remedial Actions:
Treatment Technologies by Fiscal Year
Technology Type
Ex Situ Source Control Technologies
Solidification/Stabilization
Incineration (off site)
Thermal Desorption
Incineration (on site)
Bioremediation (ex situ)
Soil Washing
Neutralization
Solvent Extraction
Dechlorination
Chemical Treatment
Mechanical Soil Aeration
Vitrification
Open Burn/Open Detonation
SVE
Physical Separation
Flushing (in situ)
Cyanide Oxidation
TOTALS
In Situ Source Control Technologies
SVE
Solidification/Stabilization
Bioremediation (in situ)
Flushing (in situ)
Thermally Enhanced Recovery
Hot Air Injection
Phytoremediation
Surfactant Flushing
Thermal Desorption
Vitrification
TOTALS
In Situ Groundwater Technologies
In Situ Air Stripping (Air Sparging)
Bioremediation (in situ)
Dual-Phase Extraction
Permeable Reactive Barrier
Chemical Treatment
Oxidation (in situ)
Well Aeration (in situ)
TOTALS
Fiscal Year*
1982
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
1982
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1982
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1983
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1983
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
1983
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1984
1
1
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
3
1984
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1984
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1985
1
3
2
3
0
0
0
0
1
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
11
1985
3
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
4
1985
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
1986
4
4
1
3
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
13
1986
2
2
0
1
0
0
0
0

0
5
1986
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
1987
6
3
4
5
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
19
1987
1
3
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
5
1987
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1988
7
7
4
7
3
1
1
0
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
32
1988
8
3
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
12
1988
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1989
9
10
3
7
7
1
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
38
1989
21
4
0
4
0
0
0
0
0
0
29
1989
0
3
0
0
0
0
0
3
1990
15
16
7
4
3
4
0
0
1
0
1
0
0
0
1
0
0
52
1990
17
3
2
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
23
1990
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
2
1991
21
14
7
3
2
0
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
49
1991
33
2
1
2
1
0
0
0
0
1
40
1991
7
1
0
0
2
0
0
10
1992
22
6
4
3
7
0
3
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
47
1992
17
6
4
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
28
1992
3
1
0
2
0
0
0
6
1993
9
10
7
2
3
0
0
1
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
33
1993
18
6
6
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
32
1993
5
3
1
0
0
1
0
10
1994
12
5
5
2
5
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
1
1
0
0
0
32
1994
8
0
4
3
1
0
0
0
0
0
16
1994
1
2
1
1
0
0
0
5
1995
3
6
5
2
6
0
1
1
1
0
0
1
0
1
0
0
0
27
1995
10
2
3
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
16
1995
2
3
1
0
0
0
1
7
1996
5
5
2
1
4
1
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
19
1996
22
6
7
0
0
0
1
1
0
0
37
1996
10
1
1
1
0
0
0
13
1997
4
5
4
4
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
18
1997
17
4
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
21
1997
8
0
4
0
1
0
0
13
1998
2
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
3
1998
0
1
4
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
6
1998
1
2
1
0
0
0
0
4
TOTALS
122
95
55
46
42
8
5
5
4
3
3
2
2
2
1
1
1
397
TOTALS
178
42
33
15
2
1
1
1
1
1
275
TOTALS
38
19
9
4
3
1
1
75
 *Includes 13projects selected in RODs or ROD amendments for FY1998. FY 1998 data are not comprehensive.
                                               A-1
-------
-------
APPENDIX B
SUPERFUND TREATMENT TECHNOLOGY
SUMMARY MATRIX
                    £-;:. •
-------
-------
                                                                                                                   Source Control
REGION  1
Source Control  Treatment Technology
Summary Matrix
 SITE NAME
 Kellogg-Deering Well Field

 Linemaster Switch Corporation
                                           STATE   FY   ACTION
                                             CT

                                             CT
                                                   1993
Remedial

Remedial
                                                                                                    TECHNOLOGY TYPE
                                                                                                   STATUS
                                                                                                                                                               0
 Baird & McGuire - OU 2 (Soil)
ttsf ir; in ~ •!,' 'if' P ,-'' "Mi|* i i|i|!,i 'f= '., ••. 'p " "'=i'|i t; jr i !• I§,TP- '?rR-'W "iiM.'f:.-;,!! i
;-Balrd!&McGtlire-OU3(Sddirnents)    !   l:*
                                             MA    1986
                                                         Remedial
                                                                          T
                                                                                                                                        'MB"
                                                                                   f:'f'!«! If
 Cannon Engineering - Bridgewater OU
                                             MA    1988
                                                         Remedial


                                                                                        ffl"
                                                                                                             JP7?
 New Bedford
                                             MA    1990
Remedial
                                                                                                                                                               PD
                                                                                                                                     "R"
                                                                                                                                                  ., ,,. ::«.„,-
 Re-Solve, Inc.
 'i'"Tf f."^l^i"iNlfi|p|':i
 floseOisppsai
                                             MA    1987
                                                         Remedial
                                                                          Iff
 Silresim Chemical
                                             MA    1991
                                                         Remedial
                                                                                                      Bl
   KSernH^
                                                                                   rtwi
                                                                                                fff
                                               f!fj,
m
ffffB

 W.R. Grace (Acton Plant) and Co., Inc.
                                             MA    1989
                                                         Remedial
                       land i
                                                                 TSfflfFf'Sfflf
                                                                                             lift
                                                                                                          .'M'is' '-' '  T '-'". ' *! ~ "'III ' 'M'
                                                                  *
                                                                 ,fl?
                                                                                                                                        fRS
Wells G&H - OU 1 (Wildwood Cons. Trust)

          JUlHwoodrConsJTrii
                                             MA    1989
                                                          Remedial
Loring AFB - OU 10, Entomology Shop

    3 AFB"-OD^i FuSTariksSm'll'
                                              ME     1995
                                                         Removal

                                                        iRerriow
                                                                                                                       .. .<
                                                                                                                           ff
 Loring AFB - OU 11, Base Laundry
                                             ME    1996
                                                         Removal
                                                         JlSff,
                                                                                                 f flf! Iff'S
                                                                                                                      ?"""*»
                                                                                                                              flffl'
 Loring AFB - OU 5, Base Exchange Service
 Loring AFB - OU 5, Nose Dock Area 6


 Loring AFB - OU 5, Nose Dock Area 2
jiJ"'FEp*lifwr;TV>~:!r' v?f '^f?;i,=L'ii'ra™^;^-l f W?~\]-M m,
MLori^WFBWOU 5,l^osfeSDock!Airea 3F

Status:  PD = Predesign; D = Design; D/l = Designed but not Installed; I = Installed; Bl = Being Installed; 0 = Operational; C
Other:   Includes projects where mechanical soil aeration, neutralization or open bum/open detonation are or have been implemented. 1 =
                                                                                            = Complete
                                                                                            Mechanical Soil Aeration; 2 = Neutralization; 3 = Open Burn/Open Detonation
                                                                                  B-1
-------
                                                                                            Source Control
 SITE NAME
REGION  1
Source Control Treatment Technology
Summary Matrix (continued)
STATE   FY  ACTION
STATUS
Loring AFB - OU 5, Nose Dock Area 4
Loring AFB - OU 5, Nose Dock Area 5
Loring AFB - OU 5, Nose Dock Area 7
Loring AFB - OU 5, Nose Dock Area 8
Loring AFB - OU 8, Fire Training Area
Loring A*FB - OU 9, Auto Hobby Shop Area
Loring AFB - OU 9, Drainage Pipe/Maint. Pool
McKinCo. ' ";'' " |
Pinette's Salvage Yard - Amendment
Union Chemical -OU1
Kearsarge Metallurgical Corp.
Mottoto Pig Farm
ittati & Goss/Kingston Steel Drum
Ottaii & Goss/Kingston Steel Drum - OU 4 : - [-" "
Pease Air Force Base - Site 45
I- s- .- •• '--? n -> ; -,„ J,r -ff.Tr ± - . Tss^ --< ^ ?-"-
i Pease Air Force Base -Site 8 -: : i:
Pease Air Force Base-- Zone 2
i Savage Municipal Wafer Supply - OU 1 , Tool " '-' -'I
Sylvester Dump
-r, . ,, - ->M ;4M lf(tJ»a,,-,,l» -,-t
TibbettsRoad ";! ^-L ?' • =
^ ==-. --.,-,. - 	 ^==,=_- .-*.= _ =. ..^^rts^ ~--:--,---.=p-=^=T=3
Tinkham Garage -OU1
;f f •-';' I :*-,- " »fli|fil I £1 t i|||'t-1*Hli J -'"I ilif
Davis Liquid Waste /: *
Davisville Naval Construction Battalion Center
' ;Petefson)purilan inc. - CJU' 1 ,!CdL^felr - : f 1
Picillo Farm Site
ME 1995
ME 1995
ME 1995
ME 1995
ME 1995
' ME' 1995
ME 1995
IME/ 1985
ME 1993
i ME 1994
NH 1990
NH 1991
NH 1987
;!;NH M98?i
NH 1995
--NH-" I99e
NH 1995
vNH!" 1997
NH 1983
-t» -|i *..t-iti', - ; «•
;::NHS - ^992:
NH 1986
PJ 1993
Rl 1993
Removal
Removal
Removal
Removal
Removal
Removal
Removal
Remedial
Remedial
Remedial
Remedial
Remedy
Remedial
" - r
Remedial
Remedial
Remedial
Remedial
' Remedial
Remedial
i Remedial
Remedial
Remedial
Remediair
Remedial





i
-

;


• %!|
!Mj|a
«,r,,i|«

•
*
i
•
i
*
•


•
1 P


Jr^laah
If
jlK^.1











it
!,
m
m
•?$





"i






,!«»
n ! i
w





1


^ \ : - _
i , -



r1**
i, S )
1: !f
•- 1 1









-


1 ir/B:1
if
111








• --•


:- ••"-;
*»r
if;
jtfl^,
=^H'






•
*
; f ;-,
i

.]*:
> =--'-
ftf.ll
*
M?-





-


• -•
L



-p"|
»r











f":J

""11
"t|r '-n




'•



t
!

I 1
nj •*
.•.jf.--^i
i •:"
tjp





'
*
•

*
->
•
*
•
>
•
i'f i"
V
*



|
'


1




|J
:• t1












*
*m
-t












it -t
' |i
"1





:,


. !-,!



-t -
r
"f





V
i

•
;*
^



^
"i





,


r-
at



' * 1
«3





-••

•
!--
1'"



-
.,,,.




:
,,


"1
;-

&

.p.
«

0
0
0
0
0
0
0
_:r c i;; 	
c
0
c
V C[ "'.:
c
'"" [ D!
0
J f « E
0
0
= Bl
C
c -' t-^-J
c
' rt PTif^1 •'
c
"" r( " o
D
Status:  PD = Predesign; D = Design;  D/l = Designed but not Installed; I = Installed; Bl = Being Installed; 0 = Operational; C = Complete
Other:  Includes projects where mechanical soil aeration, neutralization or open burn/open detonation are or have been implemented. 1 = Mechanical Soil Aeration; 2=Neutralization; 3 = Open Burn/Open Detonation

                                                                  B-2
-------
                                                                                            Source Control
REGION  1
Source Control Treatment Technology
Summary Matrix (continued)
SITE NAME STATE FY | ACTION | TECHNOLOGY TYPE | STATUS
Stamina Mills
!BM(\irn!onf ' " ': '
Rl 1990
VT! • 'T
Remedial
RORA

















t .,,.




•
>
















I
U • "''•; i
Status:
Other:
PD = Predesign; D = Design; D/l = Designed but not Installed; I = Installed; Bl = Being Installed; 0 = Operational; C = Complete
Includes projects where mechanical soil aeration, neutralization or open bum/open detonation are or have been implemented. 1 = Mechanical Soil Aeration; 2 = Neutralization; 3=Open Bum/Open Detonation

                                                          B-3
-------
                                                                                            Source Control
REGION  2
Source Control Treatment Technology
Summary Matrix
SITENAME 	 STATE FY 1 ACTION 1 TECHNOLOGY TYPE 1 STATUS 1
A 0 Polymer - Soil Treatment Phase
i American Cyanamid Co. - Grp. I (1 1 ,1 3,1 9, 24)
American Cyanamid Co. - Grp. II (15,16,17,18)
i Asbestos Dump
Bog Creek Farm -OU1
i Bog Creek Farm -OU 2
Bridgeport Rental & Oil Services
1 Caldwell Trucking - Amendment
Caldwell Trucking -OU1
i Caldwell Trucking - OU 1
Chemical Control
Curcio Scrap Metal, Inc.
Jayco Corp./LE. Carpenter Co., NJ
: Ellis Property •*
Ewan Property - OU 1
; FAA Technical Center - Area 20 A (Salvage) -
FAA Technical Center - Area B Navy Fire Fac.
, V - 1 - ^*^as
FAA Tech. Center -OU1, Area D-Jet Fuel Farm *
Fried Industries
tGarden State Cleaners ~ - "
Industrial Latex -OU1
aA F • - ' .fit,'-
-*King of Prussia ;
Lipari Landfill -OU 2
n|t '=; :-'.:} -, i;': -; -r :M « ' - i Mf **t ! *" !lf '"*' M1*4^-*
3 Lipari Landfill Itash Sediment~OU€ : iy
Metaltec/Aerosystems - OU 1
t.-- i; i =. i. "(I-- I " ' 'FI !« W!f •' ,i- -- J-ti ?«"•=•
r Myers Property : { ?'";r:r'!S|;
NJ 1991
NJ 1993
NJ 1996
NJ 1991
NJ 1985
NJ 1989
NJ 1985
NJ 1995
NJ 1993
NJ : 1995
NJ 1987
NJ ^1991
NJ 1994
NJ 1992
NJ 1988
NJ 1990
NJ 1996
NJ 1989
NJ 1994
" NJ f '? 1991
NJ 1992
NJ ^ 1990
NJ 1985
'!?NJ"^988
NJ 1986
-NJ ;"Ptf990
Remedial
Remedial
Remedial
Remedial
Remedial
Remedial
Remedial
Remedial
Remedial
Remedial
Remedial
Remedial
Remedial
Remedial
Remedial
(Remedial
Remedial
Remedial
Remedial
Remedial
Remedial
Remedfal
Remedial
Remedial
Remedial
Remedial







1
'
-
-

'






*
,,
,

r
-tJ
- ; ;












-«
!- -.!«



ill



'


1 t
^^
is










4
HIJIU
= ,:& =3Sg
m







:f, ,;
1
- -
-
•






J BH

a



"





*
V
?
*
«




11


*
*
*



?l ! -




II






>
r












,_-,.

^*^
ft


•



*



*
4
=*
f »-

•










"»;•

*• * =
w
*
*
•

•

•
*


•

-






I- : :
<•! :
j =<<
t. S

Jt
t-J
,«_«
•f -.






1 ;l
1
ziL-Ti - it
i; ;.
=1_ _ . .
1

4 --^
u
-4 =







* -*S
^; & »


*
f
^
*
*
= !*







,f. j, i :•
i.^t^^



_
•




-

tt *•




^

«
-





•

^tsfc.™

-


fH
—
0
0
PD
C ]
C
C i
C
C :
C
' 0'
c
c *
0
0 I '
c
't-D/i: Jr
D
' **" "'d " " *
D
**»*-" - l
^ - u
D/l
i »• *
c -^
ub™^ * ^UEJ-rri 	 F^
0
i|i^ 11 -tpius-py*
C
-f- 1 *r-ta
PD =--
Status:  PD = Predesign; D = Design;  D/l = Designed but not Installed; I = Installed; Bl = Being Installed; 0 = Operational; C = Complete
Other:   Includes projects where mechanical soil aeration, neutralization or open burn/open detonation are or have been implemented. 1 = Mechanical Soil Aeration; 2 = Neutralization; 3 = Open Burn/Open Detonation

                                                                  B-4
-------
                                                                                                             Source Control
 REGION   2
 Source Control Treatment Technology
 Summary Matrix (continued)
 SITE NAME
  NascoliteCorp.-OU2
  Naval Air Engineering Center - OU 23
                                         STATE   FY   ACTION
                                                                                                TECHNOLOGY TYPE
                                                                                                                                                   STATUS
                                          NJ
                                          NJ
                                                1991

                                                1993
  Naval Air Eng. Center - Site 16 under Area C
                                          NJ
                                                1996

                                                1996
                                                                                                "TTF!
                                                                                                                                                      0

                                                                                                                                                      0
Naval Air Engineering Station, Site 28
                                          NJ
                                                  1997
                                                 ,!lilrT- ' •'-
                                                  1991
                                                                                                       Tt'T
NL Industries, Inc. -OU1
                                            NJ    1994
 !\=ir"l '!™JF" 
-------
                                                                                                                 Source Control
REGION   2
Source Control Treatment Technology
Summary Matrix  (continued)
 SITE NAME
STATE    FY  ACTION
                                                                                                    TECHNOLOGY TYPE
 Claremont Polychemical - Soil Remedy
 Facet Enterprises     '     '
 NY    1990
 NY  '  1992
                                                         Remedial
                                                           -1 is- n- pi-
                                                         Remedial
                                                                                                                                                           STATUS
                                                                                                                                                             C
                                                                                                                                                             C
 FMC Corp. (Dublin Road)
! Fulton Terminals • Soil Treatment
 NY
 NY*
                                                    1993
                                                         Remedial
                                                         Remi
 GCL Tie and Treating-OU1
fiijt  | .. N-I- ii.» i "• • '   '  .i|-s n -->? IH[ n,n=f-( i,iu ,,,.hj,j I-.N ;mt !iii
fGCLTie and Treating-OU 2   I	
 NY    1994
«i|ii|-.r" Nililiii, «! ii JT
 •NY  !  1
                                                         Remedial
                                                         Remi
                                                                                                                                                             D/l
                                                                                                                                                       •!"M
 GM/Central Foundry Division - OU 1 & OU 2
 Siili iVSjir. [. -t  ip '  * • i*ni -;i |it',iinif!= 1 M- r -.' • ;•!•"' ||i-'i[: ? . TP,iT
 'Genzale Plating Company-^OU1  ![ ".   J
 NY    1992
                                                         Remedial
                               1"
 Hooker (Hyde Park)
 NY    1986
                                                         Remedial
                                                         HITIM r «•"!»
                                                         Remeaial
w
                                                                                                     if!

                                                                II
                                                                                                                         'ft.
                               1

 Hooker Chemical/Ruco Polymer- OU 1
fyScVAve™e^fle[d.-^¥
                                              NY
        1994
       !!«l" i!
       81:996
                                                         Remedial
                                                                                            "i"
                                                                                                                                               1
                                                                                                                                                             PD
  Love Canal - 05
 NY
                                         "
                                                    1997
                                                   liio
                                                         Remedial
                                                         RerrferM
                                                        •SB
                                                         i
  Mattiace Petrochemicals - OU 3 and 4
p«rr JiiBri**;' -««».--.s-iriTpt(ff5lTlp''»*"|-"!"*"
|0lean3well FjekHCOJigAlcas Prope
 NY    1991
                                                         Remedial
                                                         iy^ri
                                                         ;Rerae«a|
                                                        1*2!
                                                                                                                 ±i
                                                                         '„;  K
                                                                                                                                                              Bl
  Pasley Solvents and Chemicals, Inc.
      ir  JUjli »r™f anr smi'icMii
      urghAFB>: Bldg! 2774,
 NY    1992
                                                         Remedial
                                                         i .--• -|n-iiii«[
                                                         Removal:!
                          T
                                                                                   tfl
                                                                                                                                          m
                                   f'K
                                   a K,

  Plattsburgh AFB - Fire Training Area, FT-002
          -----   -- '
 NY    1996
                                                         Removal
                                                         : j™, --, Hf
                                                         Removal;
                                                                                                        111-
                                                                                                                              II
                                                                                          Bflffl
                                                                                                                                                          ••-    —  ---'1
 Preferred Plating Corp. - OU 2
pReynojdsMetafe
                                              NY    1992
             Remedial
                                                                      !i"t

  Robintech, Inc./National Pipe Company
  NY
                                            TTI:
                                                    1997
                                                    pi-
                                                         Remedial
                                                         flemedlaH
                                                                                                                                                             PD
  Sealand Restoration, Inc.
jf| : .-in »:-pj MS, ,I,ri,»,,,a|lll(|,iL«M,»|,li|,Hll!l
fiSeriecaArmy Depftftst Lan
  NY    1990
                                                         Remedial
                                                         :i -i m.i|r-i :i|-iuit
                                                         ^Removal]
                                                    '1!
                                                                                                        F-J..JS SP-J.
                                                                                                        : i '«
m
                              m
ff!
                                                                                                            i,,.
 Status:  PD = Predesign; D = Design; D/l = Designed but not Installed; I = Installed; BI = Being Installed; 0 = Operational; C = Complete
 Other:   Includes projects where mechanical soil aeration, neutralization or open burn/open detonation are or have been implemented. 1 = Mechanical Soil Aeration; 2=Neutralization; 3=Open Burn/Open Detonation

                                                                                 B-6
-------
                                                                                                          Source Control
REGION   2
Source Control Treatment Technology
Summary Matrix (continued)
 SITE NAME
 Shore Realty (Applied Environmental) - OU 1
i SignoTrading/Mt.Vernon ''!• ' '
STATE   FY  ACTION
 NY    1991
TECHNOLOGY TYPE
                                                                                                                                                 STATUS

 Sinclair Refinery - OU 2

 SMS Instruments (Deer Park)
               !¥!' $T>iHpStfeM|l'V
               ! : - ;• N,

 Vestal Water Supply
 Wide Beach Development
 YorkOilCo.-OU1

 Vega Alia Public Wells - OU 2, PRIDCO Ind. Park
 Tutu Well Field - Dept of Education
                 sm^^^^f^^.^^..^J.^i^^«^,>^^^^Aml^
 Tutu Well Field - 0' Henry
Status:  PD = Predesign; D = Design;  D/l = Designed but not Installed; I = Installed; Bl = Being Installed; 0 = Operational; C = Complete
Other:   Includes projects where mechanical soil aeration, neutralization or open burn/open detonation are or have been implemented. 1 = Mechanical Soil Aeration; 2 = Neutralization; 3 = Open Burn/Open Detonation

                                                                           B-7
-------
                                                                                            Source Control
REGION  3
Source Control Treatment Technology
Summary Matrix
SITE NAME STATE FY ACTION TECHNOLOGY TYPE STATUS
Delaware Sand & Gravel Landfill
! Delaware Sand & Gravel Landfill - OU 4 and 5
Dover AFB - Lindane Source Area in Area 6
1 Dover AFB -Target Area 3 of Area 6
Dover Gas Light Co.
Halby Chemical - OU1 , Process Plant Area
NCR Corp.
;: -•• = .'--:,-- , - ...i • . .as 11 r -
i Standard Chlorine of Delaware, Inc.
Wildcat Landfill -OU1
f Aberdeen PG (Edgewood Area) J-Field Soil 0& '"'
Andrews Air Force Base - Fire Training Area 4
I Eastern MD Wood Treating - Creosote Cont. Soil;OU "
Southern MD Wood Treating - Amendment
i Avco Lycomjng
Bendix Flight Systems Division
fBrodhead Creek
Brodhead Creek - OU 1
|li|,,.r- ••• - s- .•- i -~ 1 ! i E!i ill i|it fl li i H | If si I
rBruin Lagoon __ ' " " =
C & D Recycling
* i -, - » * i % i » »
ICrara Farm Drum
Cryochem, lnc.-OU3
loouglassville'
Douglassville Disposal
(• li«>' W i i iWlff ft* *«">" * i i .*-
"Drake Chemical -Phasefll.QU 3 '
Eastern Diversified Metals
ie.r • - . . !, . -. : I, r-r f ;, \.^^:m^' I S V i - - is- Hy||||j«3-d
tEastern Diversified Metals :i ' ] • ihil » ( j
DE 1993
DE 1993
DE 1995
DE 1995
DE 1994
DE 1991
DE 1991
DE 1995
DE 1988
MD 1996
MD
:MD! " t1:994r
MD 1995
PA" 1997
PA 1988
' PA? ~1991;
PA 1991
'PA'" 1982
PA 1992
PA 1 1%89;
PA 1991
PA 1989
^ PA* E "1988
PA 1991
Remedial
Remedial
Remedial
Remedial
Remedial
Remedial
Remedial
Remedial
Remedial
Remedial:
Non-NPL
Removal1
Remedial
Remedial
Remedial
Remedial
Remedial
Remedial
Remedial
Remedial"
Remedial
iRemedtil
Remedial
Remedial
Remedial
r •]»-- !i- , 4
^Remedial-



*
- ;<
•^
a^^°—
I =-
, .-.
rv!
i-vr..f.T
KW
ill . ,,: .§ -
lip.:.
+! '<-
*
•




= \
-9

JfP
?=P*I
W.I-.J



•



«
'-
-.:.,.
1 j = .
t;-'E*s
- -if
,„,,,
•(Hit:
$$•--'



,:,




11 5
i Mm-
"V
fil;
1 i'f H
m



- ,


-

i -
9hoM
^1 ^ip*
m
.••-,..
»-)!'







_
i, 1 i !'
i'l
IB;
id -.j
* ?




'


- -

f »! ?
* u
Hi
:|W
,.,,„
*
*
•

*


*'
» •'-!

ps
liR
*
3 ,-!








,-„
- 1
P. *•'.-
^f
i;:i










'; -
- '
Uli !^
••"; iM


i '!

•







-i*").
j - i



•

*
•



*

li





r
|


- -•!
" "
rif
:;-r
:-'-..








* -
•
+ i

•
V:





- H '
:'
-
I
5=--- i
^jri-^iu:
m
: =7fi.-r





, . , ,

-

-!• -i
, =_t_- -
iff
--: i





i =-
*

'
itlJt,
• i






:|_i.|_

-
•
{- •«
;
- •:-





HpS
F! ; 5
-

»4«*
- - : j ?

r





•• f-
i -;,
*'
•- '-


-- • "1
ff:
C
0
D/l
Bl
D/l
C
0
PD
C
0
1
1 Tc ' 	 ' " "
0
-:-|PD-:! -'1
c
= c^"
c
il.i - E. : , - -»:--»«.-»;
1 'fl - . ? t=
1 -0 •-;•:• --. -fl
0
r:i[ i.r -,
i i C
- -- , --"a*:-J
PD
=_-: -?'- *r: ' l!|| :- ------ »I T 'a
: C . I
PD
,, Q,t -« r
0
= - , 1
: PD* - -
Status:  PD = Predesign; D = Design; D/l = Designed but not Installed; I = Installed; Bl = Being Installed; 0 = Operational; C = Complete
Other:   Includes projects where mechanical soil aeration, neutralization or open bum/open detonation are or have been implemented. 1 = Mechanical Soil Aeration; 2 = Neutralization; 3=Open Burn/Open Detonation

                                                                  B-8
-------
                                                                                                          Source Control
 REGION   3
 Source Control Treatment Technology
 Summary Matrix  (continued)
 SITE NAME
 Foote Mineral Co.
 HebelkaAuto!SalvageYard
 Hunterstown Road
                                                      Remedial

                                                      Re'rnidli
 Letterkenny - Former Solvent Disposal

 [SSrlSrfriy Afrrny DepblSE A'reffi-S

 Lord-Shope Landfill

 Merck & Company, Inc.
                                                     Remedial
                                                     insfs*!-
                                                     Rteme


 Saegertown Industrial Area
PA    1993
 Superior Tube Company
;i|j"ji|iiTrr'Tri"rriTnn-ir mprrfjiirir
rTbno iJCorf). • :'-l:::!l*
                         -•^'--; .^*w~-<
 Whitmoyer Laboratories - OU 2

        'rlaQoratoiies
PA    1991

 Whitmoyer Laboratories - OU 3
   |am  cR mgoons-
Status:  PD = Predesign; D = Design;  D/l = Designed but not Installed; I = Installed; Bl = Being Installed; 0 = Operational; C = Complete
Other:   Includes projects where mechanical soil aeration, neutralization or open bum/open detonation are or have been implemented. 1 = Mechanical Soil Aeration; 2=Neutralization;

                                                                           B-g
                                                                       3=Open Burn/Open Detonation
-------
                                                                                                      Source Conlrol
REGION  3
Source Control Treatment Technology
Summary Matrix (continued)
 SITE NAME
                                       STATE    FY ACTION
                                                                                           TECHNOLOGY TYPE
 Willow Grove Air Reserve - Naval Fuel Farm
            PA
            1,™11
                                                  Non-NPL
                                                                                                                                           STATUS
                                                                                                                                              C

                                                                                                                                              D/l
 Abex Corporation Superfund Site, OU1
                                        VA    1992
                                                   Remedial
                                                        'Tf
                                                                                                                  D

                                                                                                                  K"
                                                                                                                                                      Mm

                                                                                                                                                      j
                                                                                                                                                      -r=*
Atlantic Wood Industry-OU1

                                         VA    1995
                                                  Remedial
                                                                                               "-nit

                                                                                                                       ffll
 C&R Battery Co., Inc.
                                        VA    1990


                                                   Remedial
                                                                   f!f!
                                                                                                   3B
                                                                                                          iff1"
                                                                                                                                 Hf.|
Dixie Cavern County Landfill

               iilRl
                                         VA    1991
                                                   Remedial
,,,,,,,,,/!!


                                                                                           I'll
                                                                                                                                I
 Fort Eustis - Felker Airfield Tank Farm
                                        VA
                                                    Non-NPL

IBM (Manassas)
                                         VA
                                                   RCRA

                                                            "fl


                                                                                                                                    I"
 NSWC, Dahlgren, Site 12 - Chemical Burn Area
                                        VA    1997
                                                   Remedial
                                                            ff'F
                                                                           I"!1'II
                                                                                      PJ.
                                                                                                                     El

 Saunders Supply Co. - Amendment
                                        VA    1996
                                                    Remedial
                                                                    ff
                                                                                                    "a mm


                                                                                                                                      - -             -
Fike Chemical, Inc. - OU 3 - Drum removal

          aKUOK'^ff^BKGTT'Bft
                                         WV    1992
                                                   Remedial
                                                                                    |BJ| |.
 Ordnance Works Disposal Areas
                                        WV   1989
                                                   Remedial
                                                   yt film I
                                                                                                                                               PD
 Status:  PD = Predesign; D = Design;  D/l = Designed but not Installed; I = Installed; Bl = Being Installed; 0 = Operational; C = Complete
 Other:   Includes projects where mechanical soil aeration, neutralization or open burn/open detonation are or have been implemented. 1 = Mechanical Soil Aeration; 2 = Neutralization; 3 = Open Burn/Open uetonation
                                                                         B-10
-------
                                                                                                                Source Control
REGION   4
Source Control Treatment Technology
Summary Matrix
 SITE NAME
 Alabama AAP, Area A, Study Area 12, D - OU 3

 Alabama AAP Area B, Stockpile ijoil'- OU 1
 Alabama AAP, Area B, Study Area 6,7,10,21 - OU 2

[-: Alabama AA^;AreaBiStuaV Areas 5,1o, i'($$9'6!
                                                        Remedial

                                                        sRehiedial

 Alabama AAP, Area B, Study Areas 5,10,16,19, OU 6
 EfJ'^W"*"* fwrrfW!*' fvpr-v iwimmmFWir*f
   abamajArmyA^unitfonlPlant'ote'1"' " I'
                                                        Remedial

                                                        Remedial
 Alabama Army Ammunition Plant, OU 5
m |i ii»i;»iBi,iii'f|K«rwi"'(Wr"!p!"''!RI;i«i«H']pif ^ntnviimiMMMMfi
ffcibaGeigy-(iclntosll Pint)-^012  '
k-' *•-	-- 	•-"•'• '-•  -   ,  :--..-.--^,^--J.f

 Ciba Geigy (Mclntosh Plant) - OU 4
                                                        Remedial
                                                        i -«|efijsi,jijr
                                                        fRemovai,
 Stauffer Chemical Co. - OU 2, Cold Creek Plant

 62nd Street Dump

 Airco Plating Company, OU 10

 Cabot/Koppers - Koppers OU
 Cecil Field Naval Air Station - OU 2, Site 5
  ojenw&ansWooWffiserving]-
 Florida Steel Corp.-OU 2
Status:  PD = Predesign; D = Design; D/l = Designed but not Installed; I = Installed; Bl = Being Installed; 0 = Operational; C = Complete
Other:   Includes projects where mechanical soil aeration, neutralization or open burn/open detonation are or have been implemented. 1 = Mechanical Soil Aeration;


                                                                              B-11
                                                                                                           2=Neutralization; 3 = Open Burn/Open Detonation
-------
                                                                                           Source Control
REGION  4
Source Control Treatment Technology
Summary Matrix (continued)
/#/#/Q7 »» *-£
r Robins Air Force Base - Sludge Lagoon ~* - *
FL 1986
FL 1995
FL 1994
FL 1994
FL 1990
FL 1989
FL 1993
FL 1993
FL 1993
FL 1986
FL 1986
FL 1990
FL 1996
FL 1987
FL 1992
FL 1990
FL 1990
GA 1991
GA 1993
GA !
GA 1994
1|:GA ' 1985
GA 1993
GA*1 ^996
GA 1991
" GA**-1991
Remedial
Remedial
Remedial
Remedial
Remedial
Remedial
Remedial
Remedial
Remedial
Remedial ;
Remedial
Remedial
Remedial
Remedial
Remedial
Remedial;
Remedial
Removal
Remedial
Removal
Remedial
Removal
Remedial
Remedial
Remedial
Remedial






.*
--
-,,,-,
-
-_,
-
«,



*



>*•
- f;
-if
it!--,
f.
M
•-








n:
I *a|
-
f"l



"




i; i jat
.,,,,,

ni.
I"
6 -I





^

fiF'|
: -

13
-
,tn



*


*!*•- "


ill
m
,.







i- -



m
f t-
sr K -I








,,.,
r i-
*
^






' : J _
^










:-•'
,-«

-

-
'
-










_^
,t»


*




]

-
^
* fl
-
f*
t









't
•
'
it
i
y
^
4
*

'v
*
*

*
T



_== =!=....
: '-
-
'
*

--
•P
••
-f







-

' -
! t
I1


4



"



•
'
Bf






!':.:-




«f
-------
                                                                                                                      Source Control
 REGION   4
 Source  Control Treatment Technology
 Summary  Matrix  (continued)
  SITE NAME
                STATE    FY  ACTION
                                                                                                        TECHNOLOGY TYPE
                                                                                                                                                                  STATUS
  T H Agriculture & Nutrition Company Site

  Winder-Barrow Speedway Drum Site
                 GA


                 GA
 1992


 1994
 Removal
. .- ,'in . rn||t-

 Removal
  Howe Valley Landfill
  ;''•' .  :'  i..i:   r  : ii.ii.tii iijM.np *;:

  Maxey Flats Nuclear Disposal
                 KY
                 • •.', 3 -.|i*4-i

                 KY
 1990
 .!:,ir - •-

 1991
 Remedial
 f  F-t'.wii;'!

 Remedial
                                        I r
  Smith's Farm - OU 1 (Amendment)
JV-r EM^-raj ,;,.., , , r.f,. ,•-,-, ,,, „ ,,- p,

:  Flowood;Site ; .  '' l         "1;
                 KY     1991
                  .

                 MS'
      Remedial
      - ijr ^r,| •, , ,j, |

      Remedial
                                       'T
                                                  w
                                        IBS1
                                                                             C

                                                                            V- «f
  Newsom Brothers/Old Reichold Chemicals
Illii T=l "» '.'f •'"!"n~r«'rj f" ~ 1 ''-   • •" 1 > |i>rn-.iir».l(r.:l>ft|»!li

^Southeastern Wood Preserving    '      ^  i-j
*- ' J' - '1.1-.',:-, '.. " . - , - ..  . • • " - „.„,.«._ j ---- , ' 3«
                 MS     1989
                r:'i-. !»i»«iffi •• '-,.-•
                 MS !!:f !1990
      Remedial
      « ; Mrs'ir

      iRemoval
                                ft!'
                       tni
                                                                        I"
                                                               Bf'lf-
                                                     H
                                      B'l
                                                                                               1 T'!'
 ABC One Hour Cleaners
   r;-- .-;,,, r r,,S ?r.r:':-,i ...WB,™,™,,;,,,^;,,,,^  !|.

 Aberdeen Pesticide DumpsjAmendmentJiVj   J
                 NC     1994
      Remedial
      r: -LSI?- -^-7.]

      Remedial
                                                              ffS
                                    ff'F
                               fP
                                                     ant
                                                                                                                                     D/l
 Aberdeen Pesticide Dumps, OU 1 & OU 4 - Amend.

iBenfreld Industries  "" H '" ]  '    i;?f ;' '
                 NC     1991
               |?;rr 'wiiiwi i  I'M
                1 'NC : ™ Ii995^
      Remedial
      MS T.'! .ISP n
      iRemedlal
              ft*
                   fil"!!

                                                            :1'1
                                                                            ft."
                                                                  Wffi


ft
 Bypass 601 Groundwater Cont. - Amendment
  "
                 NC     1993
       .

! iCape Fear Wood Preserving =
<- - EL. - ^aj - ^_ - ;.. F.....,.a. .-...
BF*™ u ..... ..
   . f •'•••

      Remedial
      H - |Ij»-«:il;,«,

      tReJnedial-
                                                                    'Wtf
                                              T
                                                                   IPS! Plf
 Carolina Transformer Co.
                        .....
                 NC
 1991
 Remedial
 ! ;^ .? .fMI 'f: •(]

 Remedial

                                                                              (Pit

                                                                                                                                                tt'iF
 C. Macon Lagoon & Drum - OU 1 , Lagoon 7
     "   •"  -    •      -
                 NC     1991
      Remedial
      -,i *.-,« S||--::i,

      Remedial!
If!"
                                                                             BJP"
                                                   Iff!:
                                                     i'
                            11
                             "1
                                           14' HI
                                 Iff
 FCX-Statesville-OU3
j|---,F .5Jl'l':l  ' •  -:«>-• u |r»''»'n.

lFCX':-iWashington ., [   - ' .   r« :'; f'=
                 NC
 1996
'MM '"1
1:992
 Remedial
T- ;-•("•[• Wf»
 Removal
Hlfffi
                                                llf
          ..... ft
ill
r
                                                                                                  i
                                                             Tin
 JADCO-Hughes Facility

                 NC    1990
      Remedial

      Remedial
                                                                                         !
                                                                                                                                  PB
 Koppers (Morrisville Plant)
                 NC

 1993
Remedial
*r^~ f.m?-: l^|l|

Remedial;
                                                                     11
                                          fl
                                 Il
                                                                                                                      St'jf ill!l|
                                                                    ""*! ip


 Potter's Septic Tank Service Pits
•rinr'" -':TT  :!f«f»iiip "••
ilSodyeco      :;.  :t ';  .
                 NC    1992
      Remedial
      ;snp,jTn|lp«|p

      Remedial



Status:  PD = Predesign; D = Design;  D/l = Designed but not Installed; I = Installed; Bl = Being Installed; 0 = Operational; C = Complete
Other:   Includes projects where mechanical soil aeration, neutralization or open burn/open detonation are or have been implemented. 1 = Mechanical Soil Aeration; 2 = Neutralization; 3 = Open Burn/Open Detonation


                                                                                  B-13
-------
                                                                                           Source Control
REGION   4
Source Control Treatment Technology
Summary Matrix (continued)
 SITE NAME
STATE   FY  ACTION
                                                                                 TECHNOLOGY TYPE
                                                                                          STATUS
USMC Camp Lejeune Base - OU 2, Site 82
i CSX McCormick Derailment Site
Geiger (C&M Oil) -Amendment
I Golden Strip Septic Tank Service
Helena Chemical Company Landfill - Amend.
i Hinson Chemical
Independent Nail Co.
! Medley Farm -OU1
Palmetto Wood Preserving
I Sangamo/Twelve-Mile/Hartwell PCfe - OU 1
Savannah River (USDOE) - A/M Area
-« - ,1 1 =1 ta 3
"Savannah River - Waste Facility
Savannah River (USDOE) - L-Area Basins
Savannah River (USDOE) - Old F-Area Basin
SCRDI Bluff Road
"• • • i • " • " i ' i ' ' ~'
Townsend Chainsaw Company, Inc. !
Wamchem, Inc.
•Arlington Blending and Packaging Co. - OU 1
Arnold Engineering Development Center
k&. : . = - , . i • - 1 ^ j mz
I; Arnold Eng. Develop. Center - Leachate Berm
Carrier Air Conditioning
-,, - | T j ;- ' • . • \y \\' I'1, i ,.= i.vif niii-;* i -H — *
i Creotox Chemical Products!
Milan AAP - OU 3 & 4, Industrial Soil
!*0ak Ridge Reservation (USDOE) - OU 14fc ' -S ?"
Oak Ridge Reservation (USDOE) - OU 23
:--,-:,,-, ,,n;i-.i:;ni', n n i • -I.'11'M ' • ''••!]"'•>•
i Oak Ridge Reservation (USDOE) - OUS : .i ?
NC 1993
SC
SC 1993
SC 1991
SC 1995
SC 1989
SC 1987
SC 1991
SC 1987
SC :1991
SC
i < r "
=SC-: :
SC 1997
SC ;!1997
SC 1990
SSC ' -1997
SC 1988
TN 1991
TN
TN *
TN 1992
"iN**" 1995
TN 1996
?TN!:!ftt997
TN
f :--||i-tHFl-^ik HI. |
•TM = 1-1991
Remedial
Removal
Remedial
Remedial
Remedial
i r
Removal
Remedial
Remedial
Remedial
; j
Remedial'
RCRA
Non-'NPL*
Remedial
Remedial
Remedial
Remedial1
Remedial
Remedial
Prop, for NPL
DoD :
Remedial
Removal
Remedial
Remedial
freatabilily Stud
.!«-«;;- ,c.-,
Remedial





-r';

:l--:;|L-=;


*;
*
*
t- 'Hlfl


T I

= .J,

'
ruj!ili^,$


,,- g.
-^
,,;; -
^rB , 1
-!•







IT-,
':'*


Wf
*
||;
f-f
.t-










•
m-
K '!'
SffiS'



,„
:(!'

: - !
'


-' •
'
•E'B
B»
tfn



i
;-'
!f




*
»l»t
ufiff
1*






"•
1 t


jfl'f
'.(
rfJ
-**-
, ,t ---»<


•
I 11





; |!
::.-:-
---!-
•'-•i












T! ;-'.-
• - ! ' •
r«
)i!f







,,. „-


' "f*
:N
J
- -





•
-------
                                                                                             Source Control
REGION  4
Source Control Treatment Technology
Summary Matrix (continued)
 SITE NAME
 Oak Ridge Reservation (USDOE) - OU 40
Status:
Other:
PD = Predesign; D = Design; D/l = Designed but not Installed; I = Installed; Bl = Being Installed; 0 = Operational; C = Complete
Includes projects where mechanical soil aeration, neutralization or open burn/open detonation are or have been implemented. 1 = Mechanical Soil Aeration; 2 = Neutralization; 3 = Open Burn/Open Detonation

                                                          B-15
-------
                                                                                            Source Control
REGION  5
Source Control Treatment Technology
Summary Matrix

•"SITE-NAME | STATE FY | ACTION | TECHNOLOGY TYRE | STATUS |
Acme Solvent Reclaiming, Inc.
Acme Solvent Reclaiming, Inc., OU 3
Acme Solvent Reclaiming, Inc., OU 6
Cross Brothers Pail Recycling
Cross Brothers Pail Recycling
Galesburg/Koppers
LaSalle Electrical Utilities
LaSalle Electrical Utilities
Outboard Marine/Waukegan Harbor
I Outboard Marine/Waukegan Harbor - OU 3
Sangamo/Crab Orchard - Explosives/Munitions OU
Sangamo/Crab Orchard - Metals Areas OU
Sangamo/Crab Orchard - PCB Areas OU
'• Savanna Army Depot - Deactivation Furnace
Savanna Army Depot - TNT Washout Lagoon
! • T'i • - ' •
; Velsicol Chemical
Agro-Pak
= - i| t J ; 1 _
Agro-Pak '-.}"•
American Chemical Services, Inc.
^Conrail Rail \ard-OU 2
Enviro. Conservation and Chemical - Amend.
» , , i ', • ni . . - . | _
»Fisher-Calo: •;•'
Fort Wayne Reduction Dump
^ .= i • ^ - ;t!i -i-j - :- i - ' -.»^-iff:i-
if Indiana Wood Treating '» ;! *;
Lemon Lane Landfill - Bloomington PCB Sites
ff Main Street Well Field -
IL 1991
|L 1991
IL 1991
IL 1989
IL 1989
IL 1989
IL 1986
IL 1988
IL 1989
IL 1989
IL 1997
IL 1990
IL 1990
IL :
IL 1992
IL 1988
IN
IN '- "1987
IN 1992
\N~ 1994
IN 1991
IN ^ * 1990
IN 1988
' I'N-i 1993
IN
t-i (;--,*<--
3 SIN. :;: 1991
Remedial
Remedial
Remedial
Remedial
Remedial
Remedial
Remedial
Remedial
Remedial
Remedial
Remedial
Remedial
Remedial
RCRA
Remedial
Remedial
Removal
Removal
Remedial
Remedial
Remedial
Remedial
Remedial
Removal
Consent Deere
Remedial


•



1 !
^14
•J



4
n*








•


*
i






-





i «
,n







^




'-.






•



i
-
1


4






.
* i
ym










-
j«
••


4


•
*



*

*
¥
*



•
*


*
*
.
-i
•

-







-

•
4 1
^








-



-
=

•





•-J
*
*
*~
•
4*

*•










r
i=-

4


I • i

•
4
4
•



-








-




«>—-•







A J




-
•



4


-

4


-





!


ai!
jf _^








--•'


I.



=^


,


-UJI

J- 4
"
_A

i

c
c I
0
c I
0
o ' !
c
-- -^---- - ==.^5Ji_=i^- f
C
C r-:'ll
-«^-«SI»'
D
.. c , ;i/_j
C
_- c_ ._ki
c
c t J j
D/l
'* D
--^^-^a^s 	 ar -T -H^^iisij,
PD
fPD
Bl
* j«*
^!D/l ^_
C
r IHT -Hf ^*«»
" C
PD
i - _E •- ..- .lij-:*
~ 0 "':
 Status:  PD = Predesign; D = Design; D/l = Designed but not Installed; I = Installed; Bl = Being Installed; 0 = Operational; C = Complete                   „„,«„..-
 Other:   Includes projects where mechanical soil aeration, neutralization or open burn/open detonation are or have been implemented. 1 = Mechanical Soil Aeration; 2=Neutralization; 3=Open Burn/Open Detonation
                                                                  B-16
-------
                                                                                                                      Source Control
REGION   5
Source Control Treatment Technology
Summary Matrix (continued)
 SITE NAME
 MIDCOI
STATE    FY   ACTION
 IN     1989
                                               IN     1989
             Remedial
             Remedial
                                                                                                        TECHNOLOGY TYPE
                                                                                                                   STATUS
                                                                                                                     PD

                                                                                                                     PD
 Ninth Avenue Dump
«Ipj;:;i^f""f!««ffl»™^iJt'f"»»™«i «,- • ,,i^ r,' .=•,;, ; |"r *j ip, Mii^'i.'}^,' -ff,,r -
;!lReil!yTar&ChemicaiyoU^FifePohdi'r  "}? r1
 IN     1993
            Remedial

            Remedial-
                                        If ft?"
                                                                  IP"1"
                               jfB-ft
                                              "IS
                                                                                               "Pf
                                                                                                                     0
                                                                                                                    in r-1 ^
 Reilly Tar & Chemical - OU 4, Hot Spot A
If *r"ITT  f 1 T 'r^ill. "-••! i!f?f 'i»i'i"|"i:  ;V 'I'1'"" i"'s"'!> "If.Jl'^-'tj'^'HiiiHiliill1:™ iinf'lilii!
|tRe|ynar:&!Chernical::.bU;4LHot Spot B; J f | j •;' 11
IN      1996
             Remedial
             fr ivici  -1  '|i
             Remedial'
                                                                                                                     PD
                                    !l| ff S!
                                                                                                               TT:f!
 Seymour Recycling Corp.
 IN     1987
            Remedial
            f if K: i- '.\**.qA*Mmg
            "Relm'edialil*
                                                                                               I'll
                                                      fit
                                                                                                          ffSffl
 Wayne Waste Oil
    lerson Oevelopment Co! |R<
 IN     1 990

          91
            Remedial
            [">:;.-!j-.i.«l-l;.
            'Remedial

                                                                                                 PPl
 Auto Ion Chemicals

frP!l'J'':;r57 ?7,7^:-"^W'*''l|*f
iBendixSite,St.Joseph '' '-f
        1989

       |?997
            Remedial

            'Remediai
!'fft
                                                             Off
 Carter Industrials, inc.
        1991
            Remedial

            iRefnei
                                                                                                                                   ffl
                                                                                              •*pff i riri
 Cliff/Dow Dump
             Remedial
             r^r-»ng.«
             Remedtai

                                                                                                                                                     1Efl
 Forest Waste Products
«rW i'-'•:-.',:--:,.«.,;( iM
-------
                                                                                          Source Control
REGION   5
Source Control Treatment Technology
Summary Matrix (continued)
SITE NAME 1 STATE FY ACTION 1 TECHNOLOGY TYPE 1 STATUS 1
PBM Enterprises (Van Dusen Airport Service)
! Peerless Plating
Rasmussen's Dump
Rose Township Dump
Rose Township Dump - Amendment
Saginaw Bay Confined Disposal Facility
Spiegelberg Landfill
' Springfield Township Dump
Springfield Township Dump
i Sturgis Municipal Well Field
Tar Lake
: Thermo-Chem, Inc. - OU 1
/erona Well Field -OU1
; Veronia Well Field -OU 2 (TruelJ R.R.Area)
Verona Well Field - OU 2 (Solvent Annex)
-.: ., - . ! . j ^ ^ e ^m
l. Arrowhead Refinery Co. -Amendment I
Burlington Northern Railroad Tie Treating Plant
i Joslyn Manufacturing and Supply Co. :' '
Kummer Sanitary Landfill - Soil Phase
r Long Prairie Groundwater Contamination ptt
MacGillis and Gibbs/Bell Lumber - OU 1
i Macdillis and Gibbs/Bell Lumber - OU 3 " ' - '" "
MacGillis and Gibbs/Bell Lumber - OU 3
fllewBnghtoifVrden Hills '
New Brighton/Arden Hills - PCB Burn OU
I'iRitari Post and iPole -OUM : : -''"!"" -'1
Ml 1988
Ml 1992
Ml 1991
Ml 1987
Ml 1995
Ml
Ml 1986
Ml 1990
Ml 1998
Ml 1991
Ml 1992
Ml 1991
Ml 1985
Ml ' 1991
Ml 1991
: MM! 1994
MN 1986
MNH;"l989
MN 1988
'MNll^to
MN 1993
"MN' -ib4
MN 1994
HUH I fr
MN
MN 1989
MN 1994
Removal
Remedial
Remedial
Remedial
Remedial
Non-NPL
Remedial
Remedial
Remedial
Remedial
Remedial
Remedial
Remedial
Remedial
Remedial
Remedial
Remedial
Remedial
Remedial
Remedial
Remedial
Remedial
Remedial
FFA ' :
Remedial
t ' -



„
.
j:«
- -.-?



*





.

•-IU-J


*






t
•-
•
•
•








-
';

i tf.fi
,,-|f
-T 3'f






:_ :^
. ':
...

n. 1
w-
*

*
*
V
:i*r
•
>
•
-: a
i-; t^f
!--'. j'H*
'S
*
m
::,.
m
nr


*

•


j-j
^fc-=i
p;t
J-= - "t s
= ; .rHj'rf
m
*


•

•
; '

| ;: -!
TB«-
K;'--:
*
•I- . •







_, =i H=
- I:-
*

, ;t •; :t
.-—i*
--if
i;'f
1 "H






t
^ j -^

-!

fl
^i^ii
fl'







== -H * *

= JN!lt
-- =1 -i
-'-*
-==-,-&-

!»ff
illji:
WiA-
-JtiJtiU
*li



= ,= =.-

Wt
-
-
::i-,a
i -
= =i ^
•r=
.,. ..
lyni
!" ti;



-- -

--!-il-


f.:!..
AU:
1 ';*
„=! n i-
-it_J*tl£
n





»

I
T:
-• ;u|L.=
•j:-,;j8ii 1
fl
4tt ,
Tllf
c
c
0
C :
0
c I
.. i i
C
D
- -^^-.^~ .= ._=.ij=_. ™_^ r _.'
D
o :
PD
"""!"'l" !
C
Mi J 1
i
1 -1 - f i H& iBt iHia-;
: c
c
, J !| ,)i .ill y JfcilMr-.im:,
•: 0 5- ;
=.-=-.- -Z^.=sMz = »3^^.=E^^9i-^^=
c
.11= _-_ - -=, . * -^i% -»,£,,-=« '-=-+
0-v M*^ ~^--
-,..'- -f,*..-
----MT-,^.^.S ^^a =0*^ =^^
PD
T" eg! Hi
PD
C
'** B1
Status:  PD = Predesign; D = Design; D/l = Designed but not Installed; I = installed; Bl = Being Installed; 0 = Operational; C = Complete
Other:   Includes projects where mechanical soil aeration, neutralization or open burn/open detonation are or have been implemented. 1 = Mechanical Soil Aeration; 2 = Neutralization; 3 = Open Burn/Open Detonation

                                                                B-18
-------
                                                                                                           Source Control
REGION   5
Source Control Treatment Technology
Summary Matrix  (continued)
 SITE NAME
 South Andover Salvage Yards - OU 2 (Amend.)
                                          STATE   FY  ACTION
                                                                                             TECHNOLOGY TYPE
STATUS
                                                      Non-NPL
                                                      Re'mediali
 WaiteParkWeIls-OUs1,2,&3

 Fernald Environmental Management, OU 5
 Fields Brook - Source Control OU
 ;Laskin/Poplar!;OII

 Miami County Incinerator
                                  fJPfll"' f
 Ormet Corporation

                                                                       :Tf! ffi f|!         |Pp'
 Pristine, Inc.-Amendment                        OH    1990

^ " '- -•-;.- 	1^_	^^—^^—i£^—^^vi-^A^^^^S^^^	^IllL.— -—-— - •••'
 United Scrap Lead Company
 Zanesville Well Field
(leieririte C'hromei^cls^o^c'rlbmel^^:^
j St Louis River/lnterlake/Duluth Tar - Soils OU
 St. Louis River/lnterlake/Duluth Tar - Tar Seep
 S Louis Bvef ^ireBporid1 a'nti DO J"' ' • ^'p 1''f
0
Twin Cities Army Ammunition Plant
[Oniveltyc
Status:   PD = Predesign; D = Design; D/l = Designed but not Installed; I = Installed; Bl = Being Installed; 0 = Operational; C = Complete
Other:    Includes projects where mechanical soil aeration, neutralization or open bum/open detonation are or have been implemented. 1 = Mechanical Soil Aeration; 2 = Neutralization; 3 = Open Burn/Open Detonation
                                                                           B-19
-------
                                                                                          Source Control
REGION  5
Source Control Treatment Technology
Summary Matrix  (continued)
SITENAME . STATE FY ACTION 	 TECHNOLOGY TYPE STATUS
Hagen farm - Source Control OU
Moss-American
Muskego Sanitary Landfill - Interim Action OU 1
N.W.MautheSite
National Presto Industries - Lagoon No.1
National P'resto Industries - Melby Road :
Northern Engraving Corp. - Sludge Lagoon
i -.,.-, r t i
Oconomowoc Electroplating
Onalaska Municipal Landfill
Wausau Grcfuridwater Contamination
Wl 1990
Wl 1990
Wl 1992
Wl 1994
Wl 1997
Wl 1996
Wl 1987
Wl 1990
Wl 1990
Wl" * 1989
Remedial
Remedial
Remedial
Remedial
Removal
' Remedial -
Remedial
Remedial
Remedial
1 ""'-I,.-
Remedial
+

r-f, i

ii r i'~


•i1

*
i _ - ' -N|t




.-,-,,-_




ii= !




ii -i




,,:-...




, , •




















*
+
•
V

>
•





•

•
•














• r-
'









!'



:-'
i :|l-
0
PD :
PD
c 1
0
Bl !
c
, . Q. ^
c
"o "'"'|
Status:  PD = Predesign; D = Design; D/l = Designed but not Installed; I = Installed; Bl = Being Installed; 0 = Operational; C = Complete
Other:  Includes projects where mechanical soil aeration, neutralization or open bum/open detonation are or have been implemented. 1 = Mechanical Soil Aeration; 2 = Neutralization; 3=Open Burn/Open Detonation

                                                                B-20
-------
                                                                                                              Source Control
REGION  6
Source Control Treatment Technology
Summary Matrix
 SITE NAME
 Arkwood Inc.
STATE   FY  ACTION
TECHNOLOGY TYPE
STATUS
 Industrial Waste Control                          AR    1988
 MacMillan Ring Free Oil Company

 Old Midland Products

 Rogers Road Municipal Landfill
 Vertac, Inc.

 Vertac, Inc. - OU 2, Tetrachlorobenzene Soils
 American Creosote Works, Inc. (Winnfield)
 Cleve Reber
 Gulf Coast Vacuum Services - OU 1
 Pab Oil & Chemical Services, Inc.

   tro-Prbdessbrs olLbiisiai
 Petro-Processors of Louisiana, Inc.
•r)»rnww«»cnjii!.w»».)!piirM»i«ii»]«i''T.i
ISouthkn'ShipbuifdinqiCorporatii
 Atchison, Topeka, & Santa Fe/Santa Fe Lake-Soil
Status:  PD = Predesign; D = Design; D/l = Designed but not Installed; I = Installed; Bl = Being Installed; 0 = Operational; C = Complete
Other:   Includes projects where mechanical soil aeration, neutralization or open burn/open detonation are or have been implemented. 1 = Mechanical Soil Aeration; 2 = Neutralization; 3 = Open Burn/Open Detonation

                                                                             B-21
-------
                                                                                          Source Control
REGION  6
Source Control Treatment Technology
Summary Matrix  (continued)
SITE NAME STATE FY ACTION TECHNOLOGY TYPE STATUS
Cal West Metals
i Cimarron Mining Corp.
Holloman Air Force Base - BX Service Station
i Holloman Air Force Base - Main POL Area
Prewitt Abandoned Refinery
i ' • •. • • '
\ Prewitt Abandoned Refinery
Double Eagle Refinery Co.
Fourth Street Abandoned Refinery :
Hardage/Criner - Amendment
j Oklahoma Refining Co.
Oklahoma Refining Co.
}--- | 	 i - P-H f r='F= .*> il,: -If '. • n IP .T.--I li- - =.
Oklahomia Refining Co.
Sand Springs Petrochemical Complex
; Sand Springs Petrodhemical - Glenn Wynnj :i|; ;|;|
Tinker AFB - Soldier Creek and Building 3001
; Traband Warehouse : \l\ ." .
Air Force Plant 4 -Building 181
! ; Air Folce Plant 4 -East ParkingW GW Plume - f " ^
Baldwin Waste Oil
•v! ': ' f "»" , -l > ;•- '" • •• >?• '"i'1 "i • ' f - i*
HBio-ecologylSystems,'lnc. w«, *
Brio Refining
! French Limited : ' Hlf
Kelly Air Force Base - Site 1100, Phase il
Welly Air
Longhorn AAP - Burning Ground No. 3
i 1'TPP 	 rl "V !!' ' '-'I * (JTW tiff ".'»»«« "i«tl .-«fl1lw«lH,«i«tS
rMatagorda Island AiriForce Range : 1 fiifi |?H
NM 1992
NM 1991
NM
NM
NM 1992
NM 1992
OK 1992
OK 1992
OK 1990
OK r 1992
OK 1992
'OK 1992
OK 1987
"lom, !il98?
OK
Sftj. ••J}-t:K!:f|-"jj ;i'!|
TX 1996
II* - = '=!! ff|-" «:
*TX ^«i!996
TX 1992
'•-V - - »t'Ki 1 •"'-'
IW "£--.'1984
TX 1988
i;Txpvf1!988
TX
"Wf^T1
TX 1995
Remedial
Remedial
Non-NPL
Non-NPL
Remedial
Remedial
Remedial
Remedial
Remedial
| -• - : I
Remedial
Remedial
Remedial
Remedial
-Remedfef
RCRA
:.Removal
Remedial
•Remedial
Removal
'Remedial
Remedial
' • ' " -3 ' M
flemedial)
Non-NPL
Non-NPL
Remedial


•

*


-:; j_ ==i
m
!|B:}
,- -i:rf'
• >M
*fi





*
PR i=-f.
JH— «•
*
T

*
1 *
pi S«;
a
1 f f




,:

,j

~- °=< J
P"
^1'
If






.„. j
-jBifai,-jp
I'i
i-
m
lpr.
*H
i|






,. ,„.

l?ii;
if
-•"|!*"
M"f:
ff..




-,
, .. -
if. ii. n
-J
-r -i T;-|
4 4 ii
|ff.
("•(-••
?f»p
iii|.:-t!-i






M 1. -J
t..
1 DI-- -

II... ]*-u.-
i : ;
Mt,^^^
ff|f
•J«-:t,I
::";!




•

-r -i,,j =
>

': S
f=ir
-,;»-
il
HI
:;f|l




	
'•'•
II \t =- K

ij H
SJ8;
*
.f-. rjiw
j^f^f^i
r»n;
>|B





, ,


==-=.=*,
^!
p!,;;r
f™
SjffliJ!
flif





'
i

,-;.,..
, "fH
,.p,,-
f|!-
w

•
*
*


4 1"
(JtL
'•:
•
M --
a=- -*.
I:-1;
••1
^
pf'f
=j-j!int





u j
*- >
it*5*
'* ' 1
f;
I-"
,f;|:
»
•
r -

•
V"
•
* '
•
i- i

*

!'---$
T||



-|i T
,,.
m 1
EIIW«
I*
*v
r|:
In
f::;
p *
f


•4
tl ;

, .1 ,


"VT
....-••prjFtr
I*f/ti
ff1^
U'-f-'
tin




1 a
"ni
,,„,.
!! ijj
- ^ 1

«VP«
-r, ,
•
r i




, ,
i ; =iiiMi
M T

m.
I-'
I"9"
?':il
Hf*
-.- ~- " f




•; '
,,„,,
.,..-
*
[3i f :
.Til i T: f
|,p
I'fff
131



*2

"!^

II l| -. L
H.-T «T
!".; .:
-,:,!„
s --- *
»m
Kli! f
c
c
0
0
c
0
0
-------
                                                                                                    Source Control
REGION   6
Source Control Treatment Technology
Summary Matrix  (continued)
 SITE NAD/IE
 MOTCO
STATE   FY  ACTION
                                                TECHNOLOGY TYPE
           STATUS
 TX    1985
                                        TX    1993
          Remedial
            Remedial
 North Cavalcade Street

                        	          	'
TX    1988
            Remedial
            p"i-iprF'ffl^!rieF?i
            lemediaT

                                                                                                twmjl
                                                                                                       —,
 Petro-Chemical Systems, Inc.- OU 2
TX    1991
            Remedial

                                                                            iffTl
                                                                        11!
 Petro-Chemical Systems, Inc. - OU 2
 TX    1998
          Remedial

                                                                         fir?
                                                     Iff'':'
                                                                •rill
             PD
Wff
Status:  PD = Predesign; D = Design; D/l = Designed but not Installed; I = Installed; Bl = Being Installed; 0 = Operational; C = Complete
Other:   Includes projects where mechanical soil aeration, neutralization or open burn/open detonation are or have been implemented. 1 = Mechanical Soil Aeration; 2 = Neutralization; 3 = Open Burn/Open Detonation

                                                                      B-23
-------
                                                                                            Source Control
REGION  7
Source Control Treatment Technology
Summary Matrix
 SITE NAME
STATE   FY  ACTION
TECHNOLOGY TYPE
STATUS
ChempIex-OU2
El Dupont de Nemours & Co. Inc.
Fairfield Coal Gasification Plant
Iowa Army Ammunition Plant
McGraw Edison
; Mid-AmericaTanning
Midwest Manufacturing/North Farm
j People's Natural Gas
People's Natural Gas
i , • .'I!..'
; Shaw Avenue Dump 1 i
Vogel Paint & Wax
: Vogel Paint& Wax
29th and Mead GW Contamination, Coleman OU
i Arkansas City Dump
Pester Refinery Co.
; (Pester Refinery Co. - oil 1 , Burn Pond Ste
Crown Plating
f a r- ; i i.: i . ii , , - •: . r , ir
: tllisville Site -Amendment :
Former Weldon Spring Ordnance - OU 1
I Former Weldon Spring Ordnance;- OUn ? 3 ; !
Kern-Pest Laboratories
JK- r« .: - • • :i '= : P i* I, - ill;- J »=~ 1- -fK-
jtee Chemical >j:| | ^ I v^|3
Minker/Stout/Romaine Creek (R&S)
F Missouri Electric Works ' *
Oronogo - Duenweg Mining Bell Site - OU 2, 3
g' '\ '• •' ~ 1 1 '- ! 1 1 F i- ' " £'"
iScbttLumber ; ; ! i • \ :
IA 1993
IA 1991
IA 1990
IA
IA 1993
(A 1991
IA 1993
IA 1991
IA 1991
IA :1991
IA 1989
IA 1989
KS 1992
KS :1988
KS 1992
KS " ?1992;
MO 1989
!MO" 1991
MO 1996
MO* ;r ' 1996
MO 1991
MO 1988
M0: '^ 1990
MO 1996
':MO| ;!i987
Remedial
Remedial
Remedial
FFA
Remedial
Remedial
Remedial
Remedial
Remedial
Remedial
Remedial
Remedial
Remedial
' Remedial
Remedial
! Remedial
Removal
Remedial
Remedial
; Remedial
Remedial
"Remedial
Remedial
Remedial
Remedial
Removal

f



*

-" S
•


-
:>'"



..*
*



-
-
i f m
 y


-

.f
4'

^

•;•
4
- -•
1! - ^=-1.

4:
-f
,
•%








. :,
J"

'
:«':




- 1-



,-,








- .•



-

f
U'



'

^
-h


•
'
i
la
-


i

--!





* t

•r



*--.

M:
>2
>- -
-
>
s-
;«?
* ^
0
c
c
PD \
D
' D "
0
PD
0
' "PD: "i
PD
c 1
0
': " i ^1
c
i iiiiiii-ipiij |
C til
Bl
C
C
PD
PD
r c
Status:   PD = Predesign; D = Design;  D/l = Designed but not Installed; I = Installed; Bl = Being Installed; 0 = Operational; C = Complete
Other:   Includes projects where mechanical soil aeration, neutralization or open burn/open detonation are or have been implemented. 1 = Mechanical Soil Aeration; 2 = Neutralization; 3=Open Burn/Open Detonation

                                                                 B-24
-------
                                                                                                               Source Control
REGION  7
Source Control Treatment Technology
Summary Matrix  (continued)
 SITE NAME
 Shenandoah Stables

! Syntex Facility 'v
                                          STATE   FY   ACTION
                                                                                                TECHNOLOGY TYPE
                                           MO    1990
                                           MO    1988
                                                      Remedial
                                                      Remedial
                                                                                                                                                        STATUS
                                                                                                                                                          C

                                                                                                                                                          C
 Times Beach Site

\- Valle^ParilTCElS-WainvlriglSSn11'" '*;""
                                            MO    1988
                                           ri^rr-a^amBJii-'-.r:'*^
                                            ma -   1996
                                                      Remedial

                                                           ilc
                                                                                        •pri
 Weldon Spring Quarry/Plant/Pits (USDOE)
m ••.nre'ii. !,r|!"''.fur r •: H""i| ',,^,FL •,:sa}-|[r4-ici
"Cleburri Street Well!': .11;r
                                           MO    1993
                                                      Remedial
                                                      ^'!.iiffl'^n
                                                      Relnei
                                                                                                                                                          Bl
                                                                                                    f'l
5!lff
                                                                                                                               SWffi
 Former Nebraska Ordnance Plant - OU1
!»'-••• "r,:I;-:i' f;';'rv f "l.j" li'^lf " ir^pi ^i^li^is:''
 - FormeriNebraskaOrdnance !
                                           NE    1995
                                                      Remedial

                                                      Remiedial;
                                                                                                     Stf
                                                                                                                       IT


Hastings GW Contamination - Colorado Ave, OU 9
                            ir"Rfifi°n
                                            NE     1988  Remedial

                                                                                                                                       •fra
 Hastings GW Contamination - Surface Soils
                 IffiiJillHi'T^'iW"!"
                 lationFSUrfacef
                                                                                        "
                                                                                                                                    if'l
 Hastings GW Contamination - Vadose Zone
                                           NE
                                                      Removal

                                                      fiemovi
                                                                                                 im
                                                                                                 {; |-1
Hastings GW Contamination - 2nd St. Subsite, OU 12

            intaSllpllvij'i^-iflpiijrne!*

                                            NE     1995
                                                      Removal
                                                           edia
                                                                                 "TP
 Lindsay Manufacturing
                                           NE    1990
                                                      Remedial
                                                      f ! |i !1*; "''M
                                                      iRemedia
                                                                                                          HI

 Waverly Groundwater Contamination
                                           NE    1990
                                                      Remedial
Status:   PD = Predesign; D = Design; D/l = Designed but not Installed; I = Installed; BI = Being Installed; 0 = Operational; C = Complete
Other:    Includes projects where mechanical soil aeration, neutralization or open burn/open detonation are or have been implemented. 1 = Mechanical Soil Aeration; 2 = Neutralization; 3 = Open Burn/Open Detonation

                                                                             B-25
-------
                                                                                                                Source Conlrol
REGION  8
Source Control Treatment Technology
Summary Matrix
 SITE NAME
                                            STATE   FY  ACTION
                                                                                                   TECHNOLOGY TYPE
 Broderick Wood Products
 Brodenck Wood' Products - OU 1"
                                             CO
                                             60
                                                    1991
                                                    1992
     Remedial
     Remi
                                                                                                      STATUS
                                                                                                     C
                                                                                                     0
  Broderick Wood Products - OU 2 (GW)
  Broderick Wooci Products - OU 2 (Soils);'
                                             CO
                                             CO
                                                    1992
                                                    1992
     Remedial
     Remi
                                                                                                     0
                                                                                                     0
 Chemical Sales Company - OU 1
 Denver Radium Site-OU 8    '
                               i m i
                                             CO
                                             COl
1991
T992
 Remedial
! Remedial
                                                                                                                 IF
  Fort Carson - Building 9648 OU
  Fort Carson '^ Motor Pool i8200 OU
                                             CO
                                            f~f -  W
                                             CO-
                                                         UST
                                                         usft	
  Lockheed/Martin (Denver Aerospace)
                 '• ..... ••".' ...... •"•»- i!ITlH!!Ti»-,lflilll,l, If, Ml 14
          Iartiri- WC Astronautics -InactivaPondi i
                                             CO     1990
                                            'WK""W"
                                                         Remedial
                                                                                                                                                          1 III ': I r;i  - -,| 11!
                                                                                                                                                           11 Pll    (jj
 Lowry Air Force Base - OU
Ffloc|y Flatslplant jjUSDOg - Mejjone;
                                             CO
                                            IV lir lm-;m , i M ' -111
                                             COH  :    !
     Non-NPL
     bob":; 1
                                                                                                                                                             0
                                                                                                                     m
 Rocky Flats Plant (USDOE) - OU 2
j^c^FJfe|l^|JS^O§|:(
                                             CO    1992
                           ''fifpfif'Tif
     Remedial
    , ,.- ,], ,*.
     Remedial
                                                                                                                                                             PD
                                                                          If
                                                                          ~Jm-
                               I

                                                                                                                                      i-|iii;-j
2
  Rocky Mountain Arsenal - Basin F Liquids
j%^iio||jta!n Arsenal - dripi^st :OU	I
                                             CO    1997
                                            ! co "'	I'lgge
                                                         Remedial
                                                         Rteniedjal

                                                                                  m

 Rocky Mountain - Onpost OU, Buried M-1 Pits
 floBkyiMdHiSii-O'npostOp, Former j
                                             CO    1996
                                                         Remedial
                                                         Remediail
                                                                                            l1;
                                                                             I*"?
                                                                                                    PD
                                                                                              •n W" nKJiiif ]lin«
                                                                                              ^:l 1
 Rocky Mountain - Onpost OU, Hex Pits
      -ii(i,n i'|.ij:ir|it|-r--'i ".'«:•
      / MouritahWrsenal-
                                             CO    1996
   TH ~ii(i,n i'i«|:|n.it|.-rT-'i-i.,,BH-|)nn-itifii»i.« fn'-m,f mfummtt
       ,»....«A-».	,  rii'
-------
                                                                                                         Source Control
REGION   8
Source Control Treatment Technology
Summary Matrix (continued)
 SITE NAME
 Woodbury Chemical - OU2
STATE   FY  ACTION
                                                                                            TECHNOLOGY TYPE
                                                                                            STATUS
                   ,
 Anaconda CoiiSmelter - Flue Dust
 Burlington Northern (Somers Plant)
 MT    1989
Remedial
npMBBS!
NonWL
f:Forrrier Glasgow Air ForceBasS
 Idaho Pole Company
 MT    1996 Remedia


 Montana Pole and Treating Plant
 Montana Pole and Treating Plant -115/90
 Hill Air Force Base-OU 2
 Hill Air Force Base - OU 3
 Ogden Defense Depot (DLA)
 Portland Cement (Kiln Dust #2 & #3) - OU 2
 Tooele Army Depot-North Area
 Utah Power & Lght/American Barrel
                      jarrelff
 wasatch Chemical

Status:  PD = Predesign; D = Design; D/l = Designed but not Installed; I = Installed; 61 = Being Installed; 0 = Operational; C = Complete
Other:   Includes projects where mechanical soil aeration, neutralization or open burn/open detonation are or have been implemented. 1 = Mechanical Soil Aeration; 2 = Neutralization; 3=Open Burn/Open Detonation

                                                                         B-27
-------
                                                                                           Source Control
REGION 9
Source Control Treatment Technology
Summary Matrix
SITE NAME | STATE FY | ACTION TECHNOLOGY TYPE | STATUS
Aua Fuel Farm, Aua Village, American Samoa
Apache Powder Co.
Davis Monthan Air Force Base
Davis Morithan Air Force Base - Site 35
Davis Monthan Air Force Base - Site 35
Gila River Indian Reservation
Hassayampa Landfill
i Indian Bend Wash Area -North Area (Area 12)
Indian Bend Wash Area - North Area (Area 6)
Indian Bend Wash Area - North AVea (Area 7)
Indian Bend Wash Area - North Area (Area 8)
: Indian Be'ntf Wash Area1- South Area
Luke Air Force Base
!r:Lufe Air Force Base- North RreTraining Area ;
Luke Air Force Base - OU 2/DP23
* Middle Mountain Silvek H: ! " : ^sj: ;;
Motorola 52nd Street -OU1
j iNavajoToxaphene !• !l : !
Phoenix-Goodyear Airport Area (North Facility)
|- Phoeriix-Goodyeat Airport ;Afeafs6uth* Facility}
Sanders Aviation
3stanfo3Pesticide "r : : " ;p -t1"" *
Tucson Airport - Air Force Plant 44 Sites 1 , 2, 3
?vV!lirn:ilr-Fo%eiBisS'-OU2 •" r «
Williams Air Force Base - OU 2
AS
AZ 1994
AZ
AZ
AZ
AZ 1984
AZ 1992
AZ 1993
AZ
AZ °1993
AZ 1993
"AZ' " '1991'
AZ
'"AZ -
AZ 1994
AZ"'"'
AZ 1988
*AZ 1995
AZ 1989
"'AZ ^ 1'989J
AZ
198F
AZ 1997
Non-NPL
Remedial
DoD
DoD
Non-NPL
Removal
Remedial
Remedial
Voluntary
Remedial I
Remedial
"Remedial'
Non-NPL
Non-NPL^
Remedial
'Removal;
Remedial
Removal
Remedial
"Remedial
Removal
! Removal
Remedial
iReriedialf
AZ 1993 I Remedial



„
}

f
^

„,.
t-
PJ,-
HI
*
*
*




ji-
4 *_
fil 1
4
m
m


:V

•



-
-ft*
V
*
,„,








„,

* «
^
-"!'


I, .





,
f *
i Jsjp

s-f
ii









y
" f
m
tr







•

"11
IP
tfrfJIL-iHt
*-
4




-- - ^
- i

'

-
-«
W
m





•I!



=t
n 1
jf;-*^
m








-,

i -*

m








*- ff




11


f,
*.
4
*!
\
,.
«\

t ^
11
I'll


|
•

!:


,„


Him
•l

ill
4






,

•
n,
P-
rs


„



.,

m

..»
Ml
f™






"!

"T
1
*f
*


i '


( '


•la i
~-t
f '
M







-
-
,„
t-
„





.*.=--

-

- €- I
1


'
1


I
i:



t •••
i M i

I V
«- ,(, II
m
0
PD
C
C
0
C ' :i"
0
0
Bl
o :!
C
C
C
C
C
0
c
• "£«• "
0
':- -: T p=-L 1 jtf'|i--y.7 ="'"
0
Status:  PD = Predesign; D = Design;  D/l = Designed but not Installed; I = Installed; Bl = Being Installed; 0 = Operational; C = Complete
Other:   Includes projects where mechanical soil aeration, neutralization or open burn/open detonation are or have been implemented. 1 = Mechanical Soil Aeration; 2 = Neutralization; 3 = Open Bum/Open Detonation

                                                                 B-28
-------
                                                                                                                   Source Control
 REGION   9
 Source Control Treatment Technology
 Summary Matrix  (continued)
  SITE NAME
  Advanced Micro Devices (OU1) Subunit 2
 ~ -TIIT, | -!ii:.V  .p^p.- < s~r; j ?-,l,n Ip.T *!•-,)] --'N^M'|. -»*--"

  Advanced Micro Devices Inc.  i      '.'•
                                             STATE    FY  ACTION
                                                                                                      TECHNOLOGY TYPE
                                                                                                                                                              STATUS
                                              CA

                                              CA
                                                    1991
                                                    "|T''T

                                                    1991
            Remedial
            -r; i^jflffr"-*"!^!!,'?

            Remedial
  Brown & Bryant
 T,T»-.-j.-:jri«i,-i.* ',?r,r,n^j»!,.!|!-u,,Wiij,»,,pT,,w,.;,«:

  CastleAFB-Discharge]Area4 1*. JT
                                              CA
                                                          Removal
                                                         :T.f:-Tr|sliri.^,

                                                          Removal '
                                                                                                                                    Pi!
                                                                                           TO l«f "f ?
  Castle AFB - Discharge Area 8
 trr'?r T^''*»r iwpr.' WT H'wt
 'Castle AFP-FireTraining Area!;'
                                            !f
 CA
•p/fiiir'1"
Removal

Removal1'
                                                                               'Pf!
                                      rat


                                                                                                                                                  fSf

  Castle AFB-Fuel Spill 1
       ''''"
                                              CA
            Removal
            ' : IV. •fiirill
            UST •  !S
                                                                                Iff"
                                                                                                               urn
                                                                                                                      Jiff IP!
  DC Metals
                                              CA     1997
              tion. RegiotfW
                                                         Removal

                                                          lemet
                                                                   Rff Ff«
 Del Amo Facility

'ei Toro ,USM(J Air;gta|Qri^|lfaarV\rea
                                              CA     1997
                                                          Remedial
                                                          -'Hi «irsi!
                                                          iRemediaP
                                                                       fffflj
  El Toro USMC Air Station - Navy Tank Farm 2
               -
|F&irchild Semjc()nductorJMl:.iView^ Bjdj|19 gj[||*
                                                                                m
                                                                                                              ?SIW

  Fairchild Semiconductor (Mt.View) - Bldg 9
             ''                '
                                              CA     1989
                                                         Remedial

                                                          lem'edial1
                                                                                                          Iff
                                                                                                                                    ! f *

 Fairchild Semiconductor (Mt.View) - Siemins
CA     1993

     I
                                                          Remedial
                                                         f [l'»	"iff!
                                                         jRgmedial;
                                                                                                              fffl
                                                                                                                                                m

 Fort Ord - Fort Ord Soil Treatment Area, OU 4
 f :,;^tf)ff-m«'- -rijf-™* -m •>WWf!™1t>i.--t}'*mmm
 FortOrd£Fritzche Army Airfield; 001._
                                              CA    1994
                                                         Remedial
                                                         • iJTW^-'C.!
                                                         Non-NPU
                                                                 .!! »:

                                                                  '
                              'ill
                                  Rig
 George AFB -OU 3
 r"r j T"lf i. iqtfifflif |s-|l .1.' s ' -'.!«" *-f

Jeviitettj^kaitl -
                         ^MfRoatf !
                                              CA

                                                         FFA
                                                         . y.T^iil

                                                         Remedial1
 IBM (San Jose)
flf'SIf'BBjfP"!': h!1'»*MJI
t|itersil|sbnens- Intersil
                                                          Remedial
                                                          rjefl, «iti,j«i|
                                                         'Remedial

 Intersil/Siemens - Siemins OU
                                                         Remedial

                                                         Remedial
                                                                           •I'll
                                                                                        il
Status:  PD = Predesign; D = Design; D/l = Designed but not Installed; I = Installed; Bl = Being Installed; 0 = Operational; C = Complete
Other:   Includes projects where mechanical soil aeration, neutralization or open burn/open detonation are or have been implemented. 1 = Mechanical Soil Aeration;


                                                                                 B-29
                                                                                                              2 = Neutralization; 3=Open Burn/Open Detonation
-------
                                                                                                             Source Control
REGION   9
VSWUI V/V^ WV/I III VM 11 VSVAblllvri lkiwv»lliiwiv*vjj /&jaftt?/Jt/ / ~^ I 1 4S 1 V / •«/.&/.£/ /&/^/^/S/jSft / 1
Summary Matrix (continued) iilfil!m!$llJfiSf> W •/
SITE NAME 	
| STATE FY | ACTION | 	 TECHNOLOGY TYPE | STATUS |
J.H.Baxter- Area B
i Jasco Chemical Co.
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory
Lawrence Livermore - Site 300, Building 834
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory - OU 1
r'Lorentz Barrel and Drum- OU1 ' ' 1 '"
March AFB-OU1, Area 5, Sites 31Aand31B
' March AFB -OU1, Site 18 -Jet Test Cell i
March AFB - OU 1 , Site 33 - Panero Site
I March AFB^-loU^ Site 34- UST site * :!"
March AFB -OU1, Site 36
; M^chAFBlJouSfsle 39 - Old Gas'statt !- f"
March AFB - OU 1 , Site 43 - CALTRANS
iJMaTchAFB-OuS;Site27 i "
-i -
Marine Corps, Mountain Warfare Center
Iwiher AFB - Sojllind GWOU 2, IRP Sites'^; 36J ; ":-.
Mather AFB - Soil and GW OU, Mather Soils
PMatheYAFB - Sol and GWOU, Site 10C, 68 !
Mather AFB - Soil and GW OU, Site 29
P'MaierlAFB:- Soil aW GW!OU|Site 57
Mather AFB - Soil and GW OU, Sites 37, 39, 54
i Mather AFB:- Sol and GWOuifeniallerUSTs ^""1
McClellan Air Force Base - Site S, OU D
?Mbdesto Groiiridwater Con'taminatiori !T fS"
National Semiconductor Corp.-OU 1, Subunit 1
r-Nefcoll i ,' •'! -'•!!!:;•.
r '- «
- - N
CA 1998
CA 1992
CA 1992
CA 1995
CA 1997
CA 1993
CA 1996
CA
CA
i i I •• 11 - •-.
CA l
CA
. i i • r^ - -JIN -s =
CA '
CA
CA "':!
CA
iCA ' :
CA 1996
MCA '= • :':
CA
!*;CA* ': 1996
CA
CA
TCA 1997
CA 1991
Remedial
Remedial
Remedial
Remedial
Remedial
Remedial
Remedial
Removal
Removal
Removal
Removal
Removal
Non-NPL
Nop-NPL"
Remedial
Non-NPL
Non-NPL
'Remedial
Non-NPL
iNon-NPL*
Removal
Remedial
Remedial
jRemovali
*





i -
,.*
.*


y
•W
*



•*'
- Bl -V.
,*

V
e -
i
j-l V





.
-,l

.


P i

II-


• |l| '
;i
•--
-
r
«

-

f - •




;
..
.

'

J
E 1,

^
1 H









«,,

.Mj»J
1-

•
1
r.,
-


,
-
,«

-.:•<.--_
m


'

,*


•*
f
*

>f
IP




•

, -
-

.,lr

I!;-
;!--|,



-


"' '
-I
*
-t
«
-,,
r " i





T|



«
!
H't
;r

*
*
*
*
*
V
^
1 T.
>*;
;,- ,
V
-'*' ' 1


"-•'
ji - r it *
'


at i
nr
ill :
-;
^
m


•i
•-
i


f t4
-j .--:


: " ^
-«


• i ir


• L-
ir IBJ
• -^

:"1
Si

rt
c,3



i
n IK r»
j,-,.
r ,.
T
*_,_

11
,^
,.,,


,,..
i
Ti.



,„,
;(**?
3ir
:Mi
ff 
-------
                                                                                                                         Source Control
REGION   9
Source Control Treatment Technology
Summary Matrix  (continued)
 SITE NAME
  Norton Air Force Base
STATE   FY  ACTION
                                                                                                           TECHNOLOGY TYPE
                                                                                                                                                                      STATUS
  Norton Air Force Base - CBA Oil
 CA
 CA     1994
                                                             UST
                                                             TH .?n-l!P'!is!l?'«' l"1TFW1:!'l"!lrf^';l*»f!B*"l'«lflt'f(WHslW
 Philips [Formerly Sfgnetics mWD 901) ;{TRM' F
Lsi	tf^-' ,,if,		LJ-...i.,..aJr , ia,Jf.-	'.	fei....xi.-'.- ...*	 ......	.... .Wi.^.aa.s.a^
 CA     1992
                                                             Remedial
                                                            i«f'fww»
                                                            'Remedial
                                                       Iff
                                                          •If
IJH
?J *f!
                                                                                                                         0
f *>f if i
 Purity Oil Sales, Inc.-OU 2
     '.i^- ,.;..,„ -y -,,,. :r,jf ^ap,:-,-,,,,

; Rhone^Poulenc/ZoeW
                    -
CA     1989
     fi'Epf '  ••.'
       11992
              Remedial
             r "ii:""i *r'
             pemedjal
                                                                                             IP'

                                                                                                                                                                         o

 Roseville Drums
MJ t« • r r #a-;]l' If :w™»! «,=••[   „„_,
j-Sacramento Army Depot;' -isffii
 CA     1988
                                                             Removal
                                                             P1(li,l« ||.'
                                                             R'emedi
                                                   IIP
 Sacramento Army Depot - Burn Pits OU
iW'r.'7ar;n-ia^|,ilsl,jr ^f'Tir- |S-m n.-ffirpr ^.J'-r=H" • iw l|lf i^iMljMliiilWBPMHlffi
[ ^abramerito|ArmyOepot -! OUS, Tank^S
                                                CA    1993
                                                     •pr-fijii
              Remedial
                                                                                                         11
 Seal Beach Navy Weapons Station - IR Site 14
 CA
1
    ma Pressure Treating
                                                             Pilot

                                                             Remedial
                                                                                                                                                Sll!
 Solvent Service
l'r*.«-"i'!'"'«>•'•!«?•'"Pl™<«»'»:-="•-
^Southern California Edison,;vis
 CA
                                                             RCRA

                                                             Remed

 Spectra-Physics, Inc. - OU 1, System No. 1
  •'ff ;-l*T* •'*'**?•'jWP'-Tlin IT' * 'pl«I
           sics.lric. -OUK System No:'2?
           - *k —- -*^ '•»•-*•	 -  i. at ^a • -_S- _......-. j... -^.j-ri -_ ju... .^jt
 CA     1991
                                                             Remedial
                                                           If'
 Valley Wood Preserving, Inc.
 f,j««.y -,-.«».»-rif «-.» ,,.r,- ..Ti,,,!, tpliiiiM
.Watkins-Johnson    ;  ^
 CA     1991
                                                             Remedial

                                                             Remedial

                                                                                                                         Bl

 Westinghouse Electric (Sunnyvale Plant)
» I > »; T»pll«lf |-"T«-• > - »-'I'.irl)? lltMIMFI?!!'* ipr
"U.S. Publc'Works 'Cerrterimarr?"
                                                CA     1992
             Remedial
                                                             , tJlf'ii
                                                             NavyiDERA

 Pearl Harbor Naval Complex - Aiea Laundry
 :Fi'rarijfiw«s:'iT«r'|Ki''"i>lri'i
            MavalCbmplexi-iSiteS
                                                HI

             Removal
              fTfSJM
                mbv

                                                                                                                                                                        0
 Poly-Carb
 NV     1987
                                                             Removal
Status:   PD = Predesign; D = Design; D/l = Designed but not Installed; I = Installed; Bl = Being Installed; 0 = Operational; C = Complete
Other:   Includes projects where mechanical soil aeration, neutralization or open burn/open detonation are or have been implemented. 1 = Mechanical Soil Aeration; 2 = Neutralization; 3 = Open Burn/Open Detonation

                                                                                    B-31
-------
                                                                                        Source Control
REGION  10
Source Control Treatment Technology
Summary Matrix
SITENAME 	 [STATE FV.| ACTION] TECHNOLOGY TYPE 	 | STATUS |
Arctic Surplus
I Eielson Air Force Base - OU 1 (Power Plant)
Eielson Air Force Base - OU 1 (Refueling Loop)
I Eielson Air Force Base - OU 2 (Fuel Area)
Eielson Air Force Base - OU 3 (Refueling)
i ElmendorfAFB-OU2
ElmendorfAFB-OU4
i EimendorfAFB-OU5 I
Elmendorf AFB - OU 6 and Source Area SS1 9
! FAA Huslia Station
Fort Richardson - OU B
I Fort Richardson - OU B
Fort Wainwright
i Fort Wainwright -OU 2 -Buildinghl 68 Well
Fort Wainwright - OU 2 - DRMO Yard
; Fort Wainwright- OU 3 ^ '
Fort Wainwright -OU 4
1 Standard Steel and Metal Salvage Yard', (DOTj i' :
Bunker Hill Mining and Metallurgical Complex
P Idaho National Engineering Lab. - Pit 9, OU 7-1 d T • S
Idaho National Eng. Lab. - OU 13
! Idaho National Eng. Lab. - WAG 7,i OU 7 - 8 : ; i
Pacific Hide & Fur Recycling
i iPacific Hide & Fur Recycling- Amendment ' '.'i
Idaho National Eng. Lab. - OU 10-03
• Idaho' Natal Eng. lab -OU 23 ' .
AK 1995
AK 1994
AK 1992
AK 1994
AK 1994
AK 1995
AK 1995
AK 1995
AK 1997
AK :
AK
AK - 1997
AK
AK; !'l997
AK 1997
AK ^1996
AK 1996
! AK!'" 1996
ID 1992
ID" 1993
ID 1995
ID !" 1995
ID 1988
f foil" 1992
ID
' ID -"
Remedial
Remedial
Remedial
Remedial
Remedial
Remedial
Remedial
Remedial
Remedial
Non-NFt1
Non-NPL
Remedial
Non-NPL
Remedial
Remedial
'Remedial
Remedial
Remedial
Remedial
Remedial
Remedial
Remedial
Remedial
Remedial
DOE
R&D



t
f

*




-
:*
f
|
*
*

-

4JU
«

-= u

ri




I,





•'*--
A







.„- ,.

;: V
r:r;
:-•--*

_-


•I





ii i r

- r

i, iff





'-: - f




; *-
•
m i-ji

• •



— -r

m-



•V !
]-:'






• _ r

j
H: .£

JV-




•



1
. .-
i - T
,.- ,
•" -••!•
a


-.
"

••





;m








|!H
-' f
-. J =
1 !
J___

-


'»

*
'it
|^:
^
4

;
0' 1"
It J










—;--;
r
11 —
m
*

'.


-.
-•
-:j
^
V
„*,
*,

*








•-->
f: • i;
— — L
t









;-i
• >--'-
!;*
V*
, .


4'

*
*' " *
*;
t

f

'





!
€=" •
vl

-1 '

^a^

tl








;? .;
>--


,





I ."



r,--
,••:-•;
!=• ^
' -
PD
0
0
0 i
0
C '
0
::...i..;: 'i
PD
^-=| ^ = t , 4 ' 1
0
j -1-, --- -I J i - > •!
PD; :
c
o .
0
0
i=™=^£ 	 *.fi*^-^-f---=i=
C
c
c
Bl
I1 ' c-; " "-'
 Status:
 Other:
s:  PD = Predesign; D = Design; D/l = Designed but not Installed; I = Installed; Bl = Being Installed; 0 = Operational; C = Complete
:   Includes projects where mechanical soil aeration, neutralization or open burn/open detonation are or have been implemented. 1 = Mechanical Soil Aeration; 2 = Neutralization;
3=Open Burn/Open Detonation
                                                               B-32
-------
                                                                                                      Source Control
REGION  10
Source Control Treatment Technology
Summary Matrix  (continued)
 SITE NAME
 Idaho National Eng. Lab - OU 23
                                      STATE   FY  ACTION
TECHNOLOGY TYPE
STATUS
                                                  Remedial
                                                  i1T*pSirSJ'P'"«r']i
                                                  Mbh-MPL
 E. Multnomah GW Contam. Cascade Corp., Troutdale Ac
 sinfB irrirv'i'f'! r:.!'i fii'-)1*1. ^'r^'-"!';'-^ iM'-vf'i  iHMpffr !>i*i:15M$ -.:< n
 feanifeFiber!Corporation  ;  < 'v '.  ^i1'?!  lih.!;
 UmatillaArmy Depot Activity
 Umatilla Chemical Depot (Lagoons) - OU 3
Somalia Chemical
t£. mii...,J. t.....i..	,jj
 Umatilla Chemical Depot (Lagoons) - OU 6
 Umatilla Chemical Depot (Lagoons) - Soil OU
 United Chrome Products. Inc.

 Bonnevi e Power Administration - OU A
Commencement Bay, ASARCOTacoma Smelter

              ^Isl^ffiiaTalptel'iklll
                                         WA    19911 Remedial

                                                    e
 Commencement Bay, Well 12A
 Commencement Bay, South Tacoma Field
 Drexler-RAMCOR


Status:  PD = Predesign; D = Design; D/l = Designed but not Installed; I = Installed; Bl;
Other:  Includes mechanical soil aeration, neutralization or open detonation.
                                                          Being Installed; 0 = Operational; C = Complete


                                                                      B-33
-------
REGION  10
Source Control Treatment Technology
Summary Matrix (continued)
SITE NAME STATE FY ACTION TECHNOLOGY TYPE STATUS
Fairchild AFB - Priority 2 Sites-Bldg 1 060 (PS-1 0)
! Fairchild AFB - Priority 2 Site&-OU 3, Sub Area PS-1
FMC Corp. (Yakima Pit)
j Fort Lewis K/lilitary Reservation - Landfill 4
Fort Lewis - Solvent Refined Coal Plant
I f t I I .. - - 1 II i - f :' Ii J • il = i 	 T ' I I L'l| I
j Frontier Hard Chrome, Inc. ; ; i
Hanford1100-Area(DOE)
Stanford 200 Area !;" "t ' " '""'"
Hanford 200 Area
fharbor Island (Lead) - Sol a'nd GW*6l)
Lockheed Shipyard Facility/Harbor Island-OU 3
^ NAS,fWhidbe'y Is -Ault Fl'd, OU 5, Areas 1^ 31 "52*"*™ ™
Jorthwest Transformer- Mission Pole
I"1" -*-T. --F-n •-•f-- i I '. n;!l' ••t-'l''' *-' *•• I- i 1- '|-..«IMfH»
! Pacific Car and Foundry* ! : :
Queen City Farms
' U:s; Naval^Basei6tJlJB^ngor!Sifelil:lI;iBi
U.S. Naval Sub Base - OU 6 Site D & OU 2 Site F
! WycicolEagte fiarbor - West hiarbor OU (kmenuf? ' *
WA 1996
WA '1996
WA 1990
WA h993
WA 1993
WA ' '1988
WA 1993
%A ' 1992
WA 1997
"vwT" isba
WA 1994
*WA**"**1996
WA 1991
WA 1986
»u, f rmt,-f- 'tit
WA 1994
" 'WA"" 1996
Remedial
Remedial
Remedial
Remedial
Remedial
Remedial
Remedial
Removal
Remedial
Remedial
Remedial
Remedial
Remedial
if f irh r t] ™
Remedial
Remedial
I.V -If •-, Ifp
"Remedial!
Remedial
r , , i i f 1
Remedtalr






,i.»^|fPT

,*,
f
-•
r

t m-
•^
»ll
1'-
f "


' -
„•:

1 I

„
I*


[ -1
,,.

..
.

ft 6


"-' !
M * H
If f
-if*






1 f Ep
- •
•
,..
1 '
,r


i-
ii
*
Mff
ill5.

fM
*
-
,;(.
*„
-
, „
4

f.

*
-"
•

HHH
•
fjHJ
>.


r s
m «
«
, ,
f
-."
i i
1



„.
«
i •! 4
,„„
tf
r.

V
,,,„
'i


in
.,,,
!•

„
I ,rp|i
•-•

* t
«M
^
tl 1

I'1
•| i

*,
s ^
•y
,\
i
•
-:,
, .
'
e|rs

Isi liMi
' s1
If fei
-T

r
Ti^. '
,


i ui
r*
i *t
•

,!
-
•4
4
r •
*•
,,.



j r i


•
;r
-,.

i




i,, ,
i M
1 JIB
--•
. I T,

•

^ i
rr
Pf
i«
C
C
C
c
l» 1 Bfflil 1 j
o
PD
s i *ii mrij
_ PD _ _ j
C
0 *^ |
c
fH •
c
c
1 a t f
* 0 j
0
Bff a i iin * P«I
-' ^ C
Status:  PD = Predesign; D = Design; D/l = Designed but not Installed; I = Installed; Bl = Being Installed; 0 = Operational; C = Complete
Other:  Includes projects where mechanical soil aeration, neutralization or open burn/open detonation are or have been implemented. 1 = Mechanical Soil Aeration; 2 = Neutralization; 3 = Open Burn/Open Detonation

                                                             B-34
-------
REGION  1
Groundwater Treatment Technology
Summary Matrix
                                                                                                GroundwaterTechnologies
 SITE NAME
 Linemaster Switch Corporation
STATE   FY  ACTION
                               TECHNOLOGY TYPE
 CT   1993
Remedial
STATUS
 Wells G&H - OU1 (Wildwood Conservation Trust)

 MA   1998
Remedial

 Loring AFB - OU 11, Fuels Tank Farm (FTF)
 ME   1995
Removal
 Pease Air Force Base - Zone 2
    ffK
    qel
 NH   1995  Remedial
 Somersworth Sanitary Landfill
BOWl;¥?BS3Blir?|Wfffl1
iPetersonlPdritan'Inc;-

Status:  PD = Predesign; D = Design; D/l = Designed but not Installed; I = Installed; Bl = Being Installed; 0 = Operational; C = Complete
                                                                  B-35
-------
REGION 2
Groundwater Treatment Technology
Summary Matrix
                                                                           GroundwaterTechnologies
S1TENAME 	 STATE FY ACTION
Ewan Property -OU 2
1 r j - ,- -r ;if - . -"i* • i 'ir.if IT I If i, ' . | ~ T • T • ".MI
FAA Technical Center - Area B Navy Fire Testing Facility
FAA Technical Center - OU 1 , Area D - Jet Fuel Farm
iT.-r.i | :'.f(. -r ,,,rr .:,,,, „,, ,-; , . r- , , f -,, , . ,: - ,, • -• .»
| Naval Air Engineering Center -Areas A and BGroundwater ;__
Naval Air Engineering Station, Site 28 - Soil and Groundwater OU
[Broofchaven National Laboratory (L)8DOE)-OtJ 4 M ?'
Kentucky Avenue Wellfleld - OU 3
Ii --.nfF^nirnif, -fly- f ir-|-.v 	 qr ^-|- ir -HI' ~m- rfi f r i t • fflir^ mt ra-«!
1 PasleySolvents and Chemicals,ilnc.
Pittsburgh AFB - Bldg. 2774, SS-01 7
[ shore Realty (Applied Environmental Services') - Giroundwabr OU
Shore Realty (Formerly Applied Environmental Services) - OU 1
pslrtcla1rReinery-6u:2 ' : i ': M •• yp?
NJ 1988
NJ 	 1996
NJ 1989
rlj '1997
NJ 1997
"'"NYT1™'
NY 1996
t F| j f| lIH^ii 1 Eff
NY- 1992*
NY 1996
NY*' 1991 '
NY 1991
^""NfH'fhiggi i
Remedial
Remedial
Remedial
Remedial
Remedial
,«rir,]T.,i f ii[
[Remedial
Remedial
^Remedy
Removal
Remedial
itRehiedirf
, ,-.
,-,„,. ,,,.,-r
!**
-------
REGION  3
Groundwater Treatment Technology
Summary Matrix
                                                                                                  GroundwaterTechnologies
 SITE NAME
Dover AFB - Target Area 2 of Area 6
     wp««iij pvnariraf" -f|-|«
-------
REGION  4
Groundwater Treatment Technology
Summary Matrix
                                                                                                   GroundwaterTechnologies
 SITE NAME
 American Creosote Works, Inc. (Pensacola Pit) - OU 2
 Cecil Reid Naval Air Statfofi - OU la, Site 5
STATE   FY  ACTION
                           FL    1994
                           FL  "11996
                                                                     TECHNOLOGY TYPE
                                                                                                                                    STATUS
                                                                                                                                      PD
                                                                                                                                      D/l*
 Cecil Reid Naval Air Station - OU 7, Site 16
 Chevron Chemfcafc^rrfpany
11*    i   mi 11  11 ny
                                                FL    1996
                                                FL*""?
 FCX-Statesville-OU3
                           NC    1996

                                                                          !»[ >i|j,l,i!| I
                                                                                                                 i  1
USMC Camp Lejeune Military Base - OU 10, Site 35
               ''l'!»O.f-" ••»H-!.r-|l«i|t-yi™r-.qif--
                                                 NC    1995
                                                           H 1|"I-J !
                                                            Remo1
                                              "I'"T:?
                                                                         l!*lll|flMI1"
                                         "5-lf'l?
m

E
fifi
,,r.
                                                                                                                 PD
 Rochester Property
                           SC    1993
                                                           tif®--' -II '•!"« '
                                                           Jl:  .rvrVM A
                                            !fm
                                                                                  T"
 Savannah River (USDOE) - Southern Sector
                           SC
                                                            RCRA
Status:  PD = Predesign; D = Design; D/l = Designed but not Installed; I = Installed; Bl = Being Installed; 0 = Operational; C = Complete
                                                                     3-38
-------
REGION  5
Groundwater Treatment Technology
Summary Matrix
                                                                                              GroundwaterTechnologies
 SITE NAME
 Agro Pak
              y~-H:^-g^^y.dj^-jn^r:iy-gr^^ffi^^^^^^F^^^^pi^e^B^-^pggg

 Amoco Petroleum Pipeline

SclllieT
 Electrovoice - OU1

 Burlington Northern RailroadTieTreating Plant

 Kummer Sanitary Landfill - OU 3 - Amendment
 Refuse Hideaway Landfill
Status:  PD = Predesign; D = Design; D/l = Designed but not Installed; I = Installed; Bl = Being Installed; 0 = Operational; C = Complete


                                                                 B-39
-------
REGION  6
Groundwater Treatment Technology
Summary Matrix
                                                                              GroundwaterTechnoIogies
 SITE NAME
STATE  FY  ACTION
TECHNOLOGY TYPE
STATUS
Popile
| American Creosote Works, Inc. - Winnfleld Plant (groundwater)
Prewitt Abandoned Refinery
1 Tinker AFB - Soldier Creek and Building 3001
Air Force Plant 4 -Building 181
Air"ForceFiant4-'UndfillNo*3"ou"! '"!'r'' "" ;"
Petro-Chemical Systems, Inc. - OU 2
AR 1993
LA ' 1993
NM 1992
OK
TX 1996
'-"TX ' ' i
TX 1998
Remedial
Remedial
Remedial
Non-NPL
Remedial
Voluntary
Remedial

*
,.


,
„ ,-

•
*
, --••„--

•
• - •

,


*
•
V





=•-•• • ^
; „,- - :,
,,,=,• -f


.- , T "]
'! i I
I


s „-
,..-,

PD
0 i
0
i !
D
o' ' i
0
Status:  PD = Predesign; D = Design; D/l = Designed but not Installed; I = Installed; Bl = Being Installed; 0 = Operational; C = Complete
                                                      B-40
-------
REGION 7
Groundwater Treatment Technology
Summary Matrix
                                                                            GroundwaterTechnologies
[SITE NAME STATE FY ACTION | , TECHNOLOGY TYPE STATUS
People's Natural Gas
| Hastings !GW Contamination -Hastings East dvtf Zone
IA 1991
'• IE " r1
Remedial
Removal








*
•



:.ii •


PD
o v :
Status:  PD = Predesign; D = Design; D/l = Designed but not Installed; I = Installed; Bl = Being Installed; 0 = Operational; C = Complete


                                                    B-41
-------
REGION  8
Groundwater Treatment Technology
Summary Matrix
 SITE NAME
      STATE   FY   ACTION
 Chemical Sales Company - OU 1
       CO   1991
     * bo "'to'
Remedial
'Remedial
                                                                                              GroundwaterTechnoIogies
                               TECHNOLOGY TYPE
STATUS
  D/l
 Burlington Northern (Somers Plant) - Groundwater
     '.'iWl nr 11 >   Jl  '' ""-' -W"«"" :
      leCddpany     ^        '
       MT   1989
JL
Remedial
  0
  *'--§
  °
 Libby Groundwater Contamination
       MT   1989
                                                                                                         '!f';f!F
                                                                                                         ^igSL.feafeb.ssfe,
 Silver Bow Creek/Butte - Rocker Timber OU
       MT   1996
 Remedial
'RemM

                                               UT
                 Non-NPL


                                                                                                                -.  :
Status:  PD = Predesign; D = Design;  D/l = Designed but not Installed; I = Installed; Bl = Being Installed; 0 = Operational; C = Complete
                                                                 B-42
-------
REGION  9
Groundwater Treatment Technology
Summary Matrix
                                                                                          GroundwaterTechnologies
 SITE NAME
 Aua Fuel Farm, Aua Village, American Samoa
STATE  FY  ACTION
                                                                                   TECHNOLOGY TYPE
 Phoenix Goodyear Airport Area (South Facility) - Subunit A
 Fairchild Semiconductor (Mt. View) - Siemens/Sobrato

Status:  PD = Predesign; D = Design; D/l = Designed but not Installed; I = Installed; Bl = Being Installed; 0 = Operational; C = Complete


                                                              B-43
-------
REGION  10
Groundwater Treatment Technology
Summary Matrix
 SITE NAME
                                             STATE  FY  ACTION
                                                                                       TECHNOLOGY TYPE
                                                                                                                              STATUS
                                                                                                                                PD

                                                                                                                                0
 Elmendorf - OU 6, Source Area SS19, SD15
 FAANorthwafsSion'"
                                              AK   1997
                                            •"j*rr
Remedial
Non-NPL1
 FAA Strawberry Point Station
 FortlRtchardson-bUAa'ndB
                          •-in;--
                                              AK

                                              AK   1997!
Non-NPL
^:±'i,ai
                                                                                                                       : ..... IV"
0
b'
 Fort Richardson -OUB
                                               AK   1997
                                                        Remedial

                                                                                                                  nil
                                                                       o
                                                                       o
 Fort Wainwright - OU 2 - DRMO Yard
fir -ip-p ] rip ji--« - i i ~-,<- r =,i i-mr; 'i! -= i ' -n-i- Sin fW »,= ilBUJffl ilftljl
:;FottjWaWvr|ht!-OU3        |!   n;f|
                                               AK   1997
                                                        Remedial
                                                        ^ItL&S?
                                                                             irniii ! ii-: pir



                                                                                                                                |i .
                                                                                                                                0
 FortWainwright-OU4
FiEJ^uimm^lW'Cdnla^-jC^^
                                        i:«r
                                              AK   1996
                                             fafc" i"1 lit lii1 iij,f',« ,'••
                                                   1397
Remedial
RemecT0i
                                                                                                if l


                                                                                                                                0
Fairchild Air Force Base - Priority 1 OUs (OU 2) FT-1
           ^eservaion-Landfill 4   : '!
                                               WA   1993
                                                         Remedial
                                                                                    ', „ ipi -i||
                                                                                                         t||'fi||
                                                                                                                                0
 Status:  PD = Predesign; D = Design; D/l = Designed but not Installed; I = Installed; Bl = Being Installed; 0 = Operational; C = Complete
                                                                 B-44
-------
        APPENDIXC
        TREATMENT TRAINS WITH
        INNOVATIVE TECHNOLOGIES
#>24',ir*"'l*^%'1
w>!
          t'--"
-------
-------
Superfund  Remedial  Actions:
Treatment Trains with Innovative Treatment Technologies"
 Thermal Desorption Followed by
 Dedblorination             PCX Statesville, OU 2
 Dechlorination             Myers Property
 Dechlorination             Smith's Farm Brooks, OU 1
                         (Amendment)
 Dechlorination             Wide Beach Development
Bioremediation (in situ) Followed by
Solidification/Stabilization    French Limited
* Includes 1 FY1998 Project
NC
NJ
KY

NY
Bioremediation (ex situ) Followed by
Solidification/Stabilization    Gulf Coast Vacuum              LA
                         Services, OU1
Solidification/Stabilization    Vogel Paint and Wax              IA
TX
Flushing (in situ) Followed by
Bioremediation (in situ)       Peak Oil/Bay Drums, OU1         FL
SVE Followed by
Flushing (in situ)
JADCO-Hughes
NC
So/7 Washing Followed by
Bioremediation (ex situ)
Bioremediation (ex situ)
Solidification/Stabilization
Thermal Desorption
Cabot Koppers - Koppers OU       FL
Moss-American                  WI
Springfield Township Dump        MI
Myers Property                  NJ
           Solvent Extraction Followed by
           Incineration (off site)
           Solidification/Stabilization
           Vitrification
                         United Creosoting Co.            TX
                         Arctic Surplus                  AK
                         Idaho National Engineering        ID
                         Laboratory - Pit 9, OU 7-10
           Thermally Enhanced Recovery Followed by
           Incineration (off site)         Brodhead Creek
                                                                                                                       PA
                                                            C-1
-------
-------
APPENDIX D
TREATMENT TECHNOLOGIES:
SUMMARY OF STATUS REPORT UPDATES,
CHANGES, DELETIONS
-------
-------
Each edition of this report has contained new information on the apphcations of treatment technologies at Superfund sites and has updated the status of existing projects.
The information from Records of Decision (ROD) that was deleted or changed in each edition (from the first edition of the report, published in January 1991, through this ninth
edition) is listed below to allow tracking of specific projects from edition to edition.

Ninth Edition (April 1999):  Additions, Changes, and Deletions from the Eighth  Edition (November 1996)

The ninth edition of the report adds information about 42 treatment selected for remedial actions in FY1996 and FY1997 RODs, - treatment technologies non-Superfund, and
innovative technologies selected for two RCRA corrective actions. Other changes are listed below.

REGION
1



iy • •• • . - q- 5-r
1




1


1



1



p^hiiiKinW.Jif'if^i
' " 1*! ' ';
j
1

Ff-JffT^


SITE NAME, STATE
(ROD DATE)
Beacon Heights Landfill, CT
(09/28/90)


•[.,. |.r,;,,.r..( ',-; ,n|f ;.i.-. •'.-•;
Cannon Engineering - Plymouth
OU,MA
(03/31/88)


Charles George Reclamation
Trust Landfill, MA
(09/29/88)
lironHbrsep&k-OUllMAi1'
(09/15/88). |


Salem Acres, MA
(03/25/93)


f,,;,,^!.;,. ,:,.»,• f 1 >: ,[ ; , ;- •,.,r-««»l»lplwit»
Sullivan'sLedge, MA
(06/28/89)
Sullivan's Ledge, MA
(09/27/91)
loring AFB - QU'l;1 .Vehicte; ', '
Maintenance Building, ME
(05/20/96) :
TECHNOLOGY
(LISTED IN 8TH EDITION)
Incineration
(off site)


fjIF1;i '^f?*r ' f] ' i ~
Incineration
(off site)



Solidification/
stabilization

Bioremediattori \
(ex situ) -land treatment


Solidification/
stabilization


cr1ii<(^|Wf«f^iffn{
Solidification/ • ! : ''
stabilization
Solidification/
stabilization
Sjrijft Bi^l^T! i^Bf'^!|iip1;lB^'i^||l*}i1i^8|5^'^S,^as^t
Soilvaporiextracffon " '


9
ADDED




, — :. - ._,..,. -








111 ci ']• • "'• ' j!







f fpffwff TSfPf




:.,-.: - jll~ ,ilf


TH EDITION
DELETED
Yes



- ,- -,-.T -
Yes




Yes


" Yes'



Yes



(ppifS-l-i'F"!"-!
.*' 'Yes ""

Yes

*fVeT?fr


HIM
CHANGED TO




.- -.- - «~. -t • .- .-








. . . ' i i . :. 1 k !







jSIP^IplBfff.ff.pl.^B^tj
'.:••':'.;:] ,'• -



*1^l"®^F*fFiyi
' - - ' -' -: -

•••^^^^^
COMMENTS
At $20 billion, incineration was considered cost-prohibitive. In
addition, the community was concerned about the safety of
transporting 22 acres of material by truck over switchback
mountain roads.
•,.-,,,[-1, :|»™r™p, I'-.SIJI'W"...^ .[•:. I'.'; (f i. L.;> [ ,iii. ]'*.!«' »|. ',:••', rtlj'l ifffri*; '., M|
About 264 tons of soil contaminated with lead and PCBS were
disposed of at the Adams Center Sanitary LandfilMn Fort
Wayne, Indiana. Incineration was never used. PRP's
contractor was allowed to put soil in a landfill without ROD
amendment or ESD.
The contaminated area was capped instead of using solidifica-
tion/stabilization. The estimated volume of contaminated media
had decreased; the technology was no longer effective.
"Land treatmentwas changed to asphalt batching off site atia [
state-permitted soil recycling facility. Bioremediation was taking
longer than expected; treatment goals could not be met. An
ESD was issued in October 1997.
Contaminated soils were excavated and hauled from the site
instead of using solidification/stabilization. The estimated
volume of contaminated media had decreased; the technology
was no longer effective.
?ii|f w?'flfr;TTR? raT^
Stabilization is-ho;longer'pari oflthe remedy. ; An !ESD|was :
issued in 1996 to eliminate that requirement. :
Stabilization is no longer part of the remedy. An ESD was
issued in 1 996 to eliminate that requirement.
Clever implemented!; Soils iwere excavated and connected to:
the base laundry SVE; soils were put into rolloff containers
with PVC pipe.
^^^m
CONTACTS/PHONE
Elise Jakabhazy
617-573^760


1,,p,,",iT.,.,«l.H.'-;'p:fT«ir
DanCoughlin ! I
617-573-9621



Elaine Stanley
617-223^515

"«M1M p,|.Bf,!'«r;lf«p. >»'"«i';»j«f
DbhMcElroy ! [ • j '
617-223-5571 ;


Elaine Stanley
617-223-5515


^SB^p^lJ'.^^-^^^
^aveiederer' '-'"''--' !
617-573-9665: ;
Dave Lederer
617-573-9665
lffieMpms¥P^l'! "W
617-223-5503

Information on the date and issuance of Explanations of Significant Differences (ESDs) and ROD Amendments is not complete.
                                                                        D-1
-------
Ninth Edition  (April 1999) (continued)
I SITE NAME. STATE TECHNOLOGY 9TH EDITION
REGION (ROD DATE) (LISTED IN 8TH EDITION) ADDED I DELETED I CHANGED TO COMMENTS CONTACTS/PHONE
1
1
1
: 1
1
I 1
1
1
O'Connor, ME
(09/27/89)
O'Connor, ME
(09/27/89)
Union Chemical, ME
(12/27/90)
Union Chemical, ME
(12/27/90)
Ottati & Goss/Kingston Steel
Drum-OU4,NH
(01/16/87)
South Municipal Water Supply
Weils, NH
(09/27/89)
South Municipal Water Supply
Wells, NH
(09/27/89)
Davis Liquid Waste, Rl
(09/29/87) ;
Incineration
(off site)
SolidlcaBon/
stabilization
Incineration
(off site)
Solidification/
stabilization
Incineration
(on site)
Soil vapor extraction
In situ air stripping
(air sparging)
Solidification/
stabilization








Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes

:Yes
Yes
Yes




Thermal
desorption



Problems included high cost for implementation of the
technology and equipment or site problems. Contaminated
soil was land! led off site. An ESD was issued on 07/1 1/94.
The solidification/ stabilization remedy option provided
treatment of lead if incineration was chosen. Incineration was
not selected as a remedy. Contaminated soil was landfilled off
site. An ESD was issued on 07/11/94.
Misinterpretation of the ROD. The 1990 ROD selected
thermal desorption. That remedy was subsequently changed
to SVE in 1994. An ESD was issued in April 1994. See page
D-36 for more information.
Misinterpretation of the ROD. The 1990 ROD selected
thermal desorption. That remedy was subsequently changed
to SVE in 1994. An ESD was issued in April 1994. See page
D-36 for more information.
A change in cleanup level may be necessary under new risk
guidance issued since the ROD was signed.
Thermal desorption is more cost effective; the volume of
contaminated media had increased. A change in future use from
residential to nonresidential would require a ROD amendment.
A second ESD, issued in February 1997, granted a technical
impracticality waiver. The waiver eliminated SVE because of
the presence of DNAPLs. The SVE system has been shut
down.
The air injection well was not installed deep enough to deliver
air below the water table. Because of installation of deeper air
injection wells would have caused penetration of a confining
layer, that activity was not performed. An ESD was issued on
02/03/97.
Solidification/stabilization was proposed in the ROD as a
treatment for the residues of incineration, but thermal
desorption was used instead of incineration. Therefore,
solidification/stabilization was not used. No ROD amendment
or ESD was needed.
Ross Gilleland
617-573-5766
Ross Gilleland
617-573-5766
Terrence Connelly
617-573-9638
Terrence Connelly
617-573-9638
Richard Goehlert
617-573-5742
Roger Duwart
617-573-9628
Tom Andrews (NHDES)
603-271-2910
Roger Duwart
617-573-9628
Tom Andrews (NHDES)
603-271-2910
Neil Handler
617-573-9636
Information on the date and issuance of Explanations of Significant Differences (ESDs) and ROD Amendments is not complete.
                                                                       D-2
-------
Ninth  Edition (April 1999)  (continued)
SITE NAME. STATE TECHNOLOGY 9TH EDITION
REGION (ROD DATE) (LISTED IN 8TH EDITION) ADDED DELETED CHANGED TO COMMENTS CONTACTS/PHONE
2


r - - i,fc--- • '
I 2



2

I 2
I

!
2



,•-.-•• ?
2





2


2


2

Cosden Chemical Coatings
Corp., NJ
(09/30/92)
DeRewal Chemical Co., NJ
(09/29/89)


Ellis Property, NJ
(09/30/92)
Kauffman&Minteer,NJ
(09/27/96)


Reich Farms, NJ-
(09/30/88)


- - <.- ;••--" 'i : •' i •'• -
Renora, Inc., NJ
(09/29/87)




Roebling Steel Co., NJ
(03/29/90)

Roebling Steel Co., NJ
(09/26/91)

Swope Oil & Chemical, NJ
(09/27/91)
Solidification/
stabilization

• -.-r 7 MP;S .flr -=i ir •* p> - _---.
Solidification/
stabilization


Incineration
(off site)
1 ' .'I * ~~T ' ',!; p E ' -;.: ;-•. -,:M.:--: — :
incineration
(off site)


Incineration
(off site)


<•••. • • , i ,• ;: • • rt ,
None





Solidification/
stabilization

a-.-J i-^ .- r, ;| npnr." ,;i •-* v - - <
Solidification/
stabilization

Incineration
(off site)









;r ,)'. ir- ••: -,o -






















Yes


Yes





Yes



Yes










Yes


Yes


Yes








Solidification/
stabilization
-•,'• •••-'•• IvriK-Ji







. .- |i - • ;;. -•-(














The estimated volume of contaminated media had decreased;
the technology was no longer effective. An ESD is to be
issued in the near future.
. i i ^m= r-svtiin ;ij<|!. t-' -rirPT i"' F""'1Krfc' "£"*' !'• ,» fanilT;lnr "i'f"! ;" tFl:" illiiffi' t'f't i",5IT!,i'' if.1
The treatability study indicated thatleaching inorganics from the
solidified mass would increase contamination of the groundwa-
ter. An ESD, issued on 06/1 2/97, eliminates solidification/
stabilization and provides for off-site disposal.
Off-site incineration never was used because of high cost;
chemical stabilization was used instead.
•-17;-.: T [IT ^ 1 ' i T -'-•'• .:'r ."' f : " , , " r .; .•>.''>-? :,;!,; l::i .
No hazardous waste has been detected att'his OU. The
nonhazardous waste currently is being excavated and disposed
of with no treatment. Additional characterization currently is
being performed.
This was a contingency in the ROD. The ROD specified
enhanced volatilization followed by either incineration or on-site
disposal. All soil was treated successfully by enhanced
volatilization and thus incineration was not necessary.
.']•• • . i !!],« .,: I , . • -...r|' :> . v !j. • ' i rs- :'•.:« •'••• •- i •-
Original remedy was not listed in the ASR. The 1987 ROD
selected bioremediation (in situ) for groundwater. It was
cancelled because treatability studies showed bioremedia-
tion to be ineffective in treating PAH-contaminated soils. A
ROD Amendment signed on 09/30/94 changed the remedy
to off-site disposal.
Solidification/stabilization was considered and rejected because
of the high cost of cleaning up a large area of contamination (1 0
acres). A ROD amendment is expected in December 1998.
Solidification/stabilization was considered and rejected because
of the high cost of cleaning up a large area of contamination (1 0
acres). A ROD amendment is expected in December 1998.
Remedy included only SVE treatment, and no off-site
incineration was conducted. Misinterpretation of ROD.
Edward Finnerty
212-637-4367

:.-:'^n;i'"^"lW i\j fir-Py!1 •' • ~ '
Lawrence Granite ;
212-637-4423 ;


Richard Ho
212-637-4372
Paolo Pascetta ;
212-637-4383


Jonathan Gorin
212-637-4361


I ' .-.-, 1 '- .. 7-. • - ;,
Jonathan Gorin
212-637-4361 !




Tamara Rossi
212-637-4368

"') '•'" ' ' ' •"' '"FTfJTi
Tamara Rossi i
212-637-4368 I

Joseph Gowers
212-637-4413
Information on the date and issuance of Explanations of Significant Differences (ESDs) and ROD Amendments is not complete.
                                                                        D-3
-------
Ninth Edition  (April 1999)  (continued)
SITE NAME. STATE TECHNOLOGY 9TH EDITION
[REGION (ROD DATE) | (LISTED IN 8TH EDITION) ADDED | DELETED] CHANGED TO COMMENTS CONTACTS/PHONE |
2






1
i 2
|
i
2



! " " • r
2

i
2



r^T-



2


1 ' "? •
\ 2


|
Waldick Aerospace Devices,
lnc.,NJ
(03/29/91)




Waldick Aerospace Devices,
Inc., NJ
(09/29/87)
White Chemical Corp., NJ
(09/26/91)


-I .-. j- II If . ITI| l-'l 1 1
Brookhaven National !
Laboratory (USDOE)-|OU 4, NY
(03/25/96) i
CircuitronCorp.,NY
(03/29/91)


'Hookeril02rijStreetLandfill),
NY I
(09/26/90)

Love Canal - 93rd St. School,
NY
(09/26/88)
:T:l ! -f T" "' '" '" ' '"
Marathon Battery Corp., NY
(09/30/88)


Incineration
(off site)





Solidification/
stabilization

Solidification/
stabilization


- •!-, I.
ThisisanFY96ROD
that was not listed in the
eighth edition.
Incineration
(off site)


Incineration
(off site)


Solidification/
stabilization

- M - |.[":-r - -
Solidification/
stabilization

















Soil vapor
extraction





EI - i 1 ! i






- ! ' " ' 	




Yes






Yes


Yes



i - i - •



Yes



Yes



Yes



Yes

























I, ,-v -; ,, -', ',






- ; -i-




Mtsinterpretation of the ROD. Off-site incineration never was
implemented. The ROD specified on-sHe thermal treatment
or thermal desorption.




Misinterpretation of the ROD. :


Misinterpretation of the ROD. ROD specified that the site
should be stabilized, referring to the site stabilization process
performed during a previous remedial action. This did not
mean treatment using stabilization/solidification.
I r r -. , -- . - - 1 i-'-l . . j 1i. -- ii «i, sr - '
Soil vapor extraction was added to enhance the existing in situ
air stripping system.

Misinterpretation of the ROD. Soil was excavated and
transported to an approved RCRA treatment and disposal
facility. Incineration (off site) was selected as the method of
treatment to develop a conservative cost estimate.
^Original ROD 'specified Incineration of sediments outside
slurry wall. Slurry has been repositioned to contain any
migration of NAPL plumes. The site will be capped instead.
ROD Amendment issued 06/9/95.
Residents did not want any materials treated on site. Materials
were disposed of off site instead. A ROD amendment was
issued in 05/91.
I"?" :{[!; T ' ' "' •' •'•"'! >: -K f •'*-" '"" " ' !
All three solidification/ stabilization projects were conducted as
one project; even though three RODs were issued. The work
is documented in the ASR as a single project. Therefore, the
two other projects have been deleted.
Daniel Weissman
212-6374384

George Buc (USAGE)
9083893040
Dave Modricker (USAGE)
717-7484505
Daniel Weissman ;
212-6374384 |

Betsy Donovan
212-637-4369


i r i - ' in; "- -
Mary Logan \
212-6374321 }

SharonTrocher
212-637-3965


PaulOlivo
212-6374280


DamianDuda
212-6374269

t > .| If - T -I I, 1 - | . .' - .
Pam Tames •
212-6374255 i


Information on the date and issuance of Explanations of Significant Differences (ESDs) and ROD Amendments is not complete.
-------
Ninth  Edition (April 1999)  (continued)
•••
REGION
2
2
2
2
3
.,,., ^,v,
3
rrrsfifi
SITE NAME STATE
(ROD DATE)
Marathon Battery Corp., NY
(09/30/89)
Mattiace Petrochemicals - OU
1,5,and6,NY
(06/27/91) |
Clean Well Field -OU 2, NY
(09/30/96)
Solvent Savers, NY
(09/30/90) i
Delaware Sand & Gravel
Landfill -OU 4 and OU 5, DE
(09/30/93)
E.I. DuPont-Newport SitH DE
(09/23/93)
Halby Chemical Co. -OU1,
Process Plant Area, DE
(06/28/91)
Aberdeen Proving Ground !
(Edgewood Area) J-Field Soil,
OU, MD
(09/27/96)
TECHNOLOGY
(LISTED IN 8TH EDITION)
Solidification/
stabilization
'^fpffll^'Tf^"^"1"™
Incineration j !
(off site) i
In situ air stripping
(airsparging)
Thermal desorptibn ' '
Soil vapor extraction
NoneJ; :•; ;::;•' ' • .
Solidification/
stabilization
'This! is^anFYge ROD; that-
was not listed in the eighth
edition.
9
ADDED



^.Trnvpf ,
-™-


TH EDITION
DELETED
Yes
Yes
Yes

mF:


i^HH
CHANGED TO



' Soil vapor
extraction
Bioremediation
(in situ) -
bioventing
Chemical
treatment
Phyto-
remediation
^^HHHH^^^^H||H
COMMENTS
All three solidification/ stabilization projects were conducted
as one project, even though three RODs were issued. The
work is documented in the ASR as a single project.
Therefore, the two other projects have been deleted.
'Th'eRO&WeMe^in&rie.rai6n^laposbil^m!ethbd:of ' '; :" ]
treatment, but incineration was notthe selected remedy.
Air sparging was considered for the dry cleaning. A pilot test
demonstrated that air sparging was not feasible because of site
conditions. Contaminated soil will be excavated instead (a
contingency in the ROD, so no ESD or ROD amendment is
necessary).
SVE is being conducted as'a pilotstudy.'bulthermaldesbfption
may be used in the future. !
Treating soil with SVE followed by bioventing would not have
enhanced the rate of removal of VOCs from soil. Therefore,
bioventing was used without SVE. The remedy was a
contingency in the ROD.
•?^j!!^¥fl^}ff!f^^^
Original remedy was not Itstedjin the!iASR.;The 1993 ROD
selected solidification/stabilization (in situ).; However, the
waste was much deeper than originally estimated. Due to the
increased volume of waste, the cleanup costs were
significantly higher than cited in the 1993 ROD. On 08/16/95
EPA issued and ESD to change the remedy to containment
with pump-and-treatfor groundwater.
Misinterpretation of ROD; in situ chemical oxidation was
used.
Incineration and sqlidification/stabilizatibn, provided forjin me ;
original ROD, was considered dangerous because of the
presence of unexploded ordnance. A ROD amendment is to
be issued in the near future for a change to phytoremediation.
i^"""™
CONTACTS/PHONE
Pam Tames
212-637-4255
Edward Als ' i
212-637-4272 i
i
Thomas Taccone
212-6374281
LJsaWong ! |i i
212-6374267 ; i i
Eric Newman
215-8143237
Lisa Brown i : f
215-814-5528
Eric Newman
215-814-3237
Steven RJHirsh J| ' '":: '
215-566-3352
Information on the date and issuance of Explanations of Significant Differences (ESDs) and ROD Amendments is not complete.
                                                                        D-5
-------
Ninth Edition  (April 1999)  (continued)
REGION
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
SITE NAME STATE TECHNOLOGY 9TH EDITION
(ROD DATE) (LISTED IN 8TH EDITION) ADDED I DELETED I CHANGED TO COMMENTS CONTACTS/PHONE
Mid-Atlantic Wood Preservers,
MD
(12/31/90)
Aladdin Plating, PA
(09/27/88)
Berks Sand Pit, PA
(09/29/88)
Brown's Battery Breaking Site -
OU 2, PA
(07/02/92)
Douglassville Disposal, PA
(06/30/89)
'• I •; -' r • '
Drake Chemical - Pha'se II, PA
(05/13/86) ;
Hebelka Auto Salvage Yard, PA
(09/30/91)
M.W. Manufacturing, PA
(03/31/89)
Solidification/
stabilization
Solidification/
stabilization
Incineration
(off site)
Plasma high- temperature
recovery
Incineration
(on site)
Incineration
(on!site)
Solidification/
stabilization
Incineration
(off site)








\fes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes








Solidification/
stabilization
and
Thermal
Desorption
The remedy was a contingency in the ROD. Solidification/
stabilization was to be used only if the level of arsenic was
above 1 000 mg/kg. Results of soil analysis on all samples at
the site show levels of arsenic below 1 ,000 mg/kg.
A vendor demonstration of electrokinetics to treat contami-
nated groundwater and soils will continue. A subsequent
ROD issued on 12/30/93 requires institutional controls and
monitoring, but no solidification/stabilization.
The source of contamination in sediments is being eliminated
because of lowering of the water table, eliminating the need for
excavation and incineration (off site) of sediments. An ESD
has been proposed and will be made final after a public
comment period of 30 days.
Problems with implementation include high cost and equipment
or site problems.
Community concerns prohibited the use of the technology. A
feasibility study of solidification/stabilization is being
conducted. A ROD amendment is expected in FY99.
i?i~" . •• "ill' ' i" "f i'. ' i" - :i'~r ' 1 :fl , T i- if T ,,!:-• r
This is a duplicate project. Both the 1 986 and the 1 988 ROD
specified incineration. Incineration (on site) was chosen
because of a preference for on-site treatment. The work is
documented as a single project.
The 1 991 ROD refers to solidification/stabilization of lead-
contaminated soils completed under the 1 989 ROD, but the
1 991 ROD specifies monitoring of groundwater only; no
solidification/stabilization of additional sites is specified.
- :' i • I ' - • ' : '
Results of treatability study showed burning fluff caused
potential threat due to emissions of dioxin. Thus, offsite
incineration was not implemented. ROD Amendment issued
12/22/97 selected ex-situ stabilization and low temperature
thermal desorption.
Eric Newman
215-8143237
Gregory D.Hamm
215-566-3194
Bruce Rundell
215-5664317
Richard Watman i
215-5664219 |
Victor J.Janosik
215-5664217
Gregg Crystall i
215-5664207 ]:
Frederick N.Macmillan
215-8144201
Bhupendra Khona
215-566-3213
Information on the date and issuance of Explanations of Significant Differences (ESDs) and ROD Amendments is not complete.
                                                                        D-6
-------
Ninth Edition  (April 1999)  (continued)
REGION
3
r iT'
i
3
3
3
3
(
3
\ \
4
SITE NAME, STATE
(ROD DATE)
Publicker Industries, Inc. - OU
3, PA
(12/28/95)
Greenwood Chemical Co., VA
(12/29/89)
Rentokil Virginia Wood
Preserving, VA
(06/22/93)
f,\ ![ |; 'f f]V *'' ""' I" ' "*'-'•'
Rentokil Virginia Wood
Preserving, VA
(06/22/93)
Saunders Supply Co., VA
(09/30/91)
-:,-,-77!" .=.JT If fif T: "P i|".1" r"| *n|? '"(i: »* * H ' •'"!-;
Fike Chemical, Inc.- OU1,
WV
(09/29/88)
Fike Chemical, lnc.-WV
(03/31/92)
Fike Chemical] Inc. -bus- '
Drum Removal, WV
(03/31/92)
CibaGeigy(Mclntosh Plant),
AL
(07/14/92)
TECHNOLOGY
(LISTED IN 8TH EDITION)
Solidification/
stabilization
'! '™fl? •"•-.•"" 	 ' "
Solidification/
stabilization
Incineration
(off site)
Solidification/
stabilization
Solidification/
stabilization
"-"-| *•[•--: I:*: ,-|pr^~ : ~i ' i !' ">'• '• "'-
Solidification/
stabilization
Neutralization
Solidification)
stabilization
Solidification/
stabilization
9
ADDED
-- — 	 --


;,.r. -.;., , .,-. -



TH EDITION
DELETED
Yes
Yes
Yes
;Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
CHANGED TO
----.'•••":• - 	 -


. -, .-f 	 . , , •



COMMENTS
The remedy was a contingency. Wastes were disposed of in
a landfill.
- .Pf!! ifr f|'ij'i. f-T-'iiFin - :- ----.lu-Fii '•"-- ^nr- - -: =-•-,-. -n-1 " 'j ,} ~ j-nr \< ' "!'
1 : ! li 1 1 = • . . • . ii i ;,.;•!
Solidification/stabilization of soils contaminated with arsenic!
would not have been cost-effective for the small volume of
waste present. No ROD amendment or ESD was issued.
Cost too high. A value engineering analysis indicated that
contaminants in soil could successfully be contained with a
slurry wall and cap. A pump and treat system for dewatering
could effectively immobilize contaminants. ROD Amendment
issued 08/27/96.
,T> :f,, , ,-,..i p.-. i^Wf..^^;^,,!,!.,:,.-,,, „ * , '"flfp^,
Cost too high. A value engineering analysis indicated that :
contaminants in soil could successfully be contained with a
slurry wall and cap. A pump and treat system for dewatering
could effectively immobilize contaminants. ROD Amendment
issued 08/27/96.
Solidification/stabilization was a contingency that was found to
be unnecessary.
1 ',' .; '•" ll:,, i:' •:' .B;':I> " •!', -;: -; ."j,.- ]i|. ,^~tf 117 "f '-- -iitiflrnr:* -M-'-'fiT! :t 6 ' ' '"(. f : r rr-.r -
Misinterpretation of the ROD. TheRO'D called for drainage of
water and liquid from the lagoon (referred to as "stabilization" in
the ROD). Lagoon sludge then was to be sent off site for
incineration.
The excavated drums were damaged and were sent off site for
disposal. ESD issued 05/1 3/93.
Stabilizing in the ROD referred to stabilizing acidic wastes.
The closeout report indicated that all nonhazardous soils were
landfilled and hazardous wastes were incinerated. Solidification/
stabilization was a contingency remedy.
Solidification/stabilization was not implemented because it
would bring about no cost savings.
CONTACTS/PHONE
Frances Costanzi
215-5663196
- !f j •;: -'^If- -a: •-; - n - • •-•.-;
Philip Rotstein ;
215-814-3232
Andrew C.Palestini
215-56&3233
' 	 '•:•'' 	 :TVI
Andrew C.Palestini !
215-56&3233 I
!
i
i
Andrew C.Palestini
215-56&3233
"""" ' "'•"" r"P 	 'r'i
KatherineLose ;
215-5663240 :
Katherine Lose
215-566-3240
"'"i'losi-'r •• •- i-i», >'li'p ''"if*1*"15!
Katherine Lose \
215-5663240 ".
Charles L King, Jr.
404-562-8931
Information on the date and issuance of Explanations of Significant Differences (ESDs) and ROD Amendments is not complete.
                                                                       D-7
-------
Ninth  Edition (April 1999) (continued)
REGION
4
j 4
4

4
j
4
! 4
4
i : 4 ;
4
SITE NAME STATE TECHNOLOGY 9TH EDITION
{ROD DATE) (LISTED IN 8TH EDITION) ADDED 1 DELETED! CHANGED TO
CibaGeJgy(Mclntosh Plant) -
OU3.AL
(07/25/95)
, •) Mi
Anodyne, Inc., FL
(06/17/93)
Brown Wood Preserving, FL
(04/8/88)
H si in i| • r • i ii if - - n i -•- t i . r •
Cecil Field Naval Air Station -
OU2,Sites5and17,FL
(06/24/96)
Cecil Field Naval Air Station -
OU6,Site11,FL
(09/14/94)
.1 • :.r[ii-|,t ipi l*fi>!|r !••« '. .qr.. IT -
Cecil Field Nival Air Station -
OU7.FL
(07/17/96)
Cecil Field Naval Air Station -
OU 7, FL
(07/17)96)
;< i i " ii ] .: "i (="•" "! " -" " i T ]-' " ttt n- f! n JP
Coleman-EvansWood ;
Preserving - Amendment, FL
(0926/90)
Gold Coast Oil Corp., FL
(09/11/87)
Bioremediation
(in situ) -other
Solidification/
stabilization
Solidification/
stabilization
1 f I t < I 1 ~ r • '
Bioremediation
(in situ) - groundwater
Incineration
(off site)
rn..|,--l HI ; n; 1 	 - - - :"'
Bioremediation
(in situ) -groundwater
Soil vapor extraction
* f' :ff" ' • I ' , '' '! '
Solidification/
stabilization
Solidification)
stabilization



r -' '







Yes
Yes


Yes
>fes
Yes

Yes
Incineration
(on site)


•!'» > 	 i
Air sparging

•

Thermal
desorption

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^H^^^^^^^^^^H
COMMENTS 1 CONTACTS/PHONE |
The treatabiity study was unsuccessful; treatment goals could
not be met Wastes are being incinerated instead.
The amount of contaminated sol was less than anicipated,
and the soil was excavated and landfilled off site.
Contingency. This technology in ROD was to be considered
only if ex situ biodegradation - land treatment did not attain
the desired cleanup levels for the appropriate indicator
chemicals within the two-year time period. Goals were met
within 18 months.
i i , - . i ---.in. |i,.,|i ,,',„!• , ,IK
DebbieVaughn-Wright '<
404-562-8539 j
Debbie Vaughn-Wright
404-562-8539
DebbieVaughn-Wright i
404-562-8539 i
|
DebbieVaughn-Wright
404-562-8539
• .• -- f. _ _ T ~ r '", -'•'• . ' IF - • 'if'"-;
Randall Chaffins
404-562-8929
Brad Jackson
404-562-8925
Information on the date and issuance of Explanations of Significant Differences (ESDs) and ROD Amendments is not complete.
                                                                       D-8
-------
Ninth Edition (April 1999)  (continued)
1 SITE NAME. STATE TECHNOLOGY 9TH EDITION
REGION (ROD DATE) (LISTED IN 8TH EDITION) ADDED 1 DELETED 1 CHANGED TO COMMENTS CONTACTS/PHONE
4




, r-
4

i
4


4 '


4


| 4
t

j
f
4



jf»fit««i«H
! - 4
]
I
..,...,
4


Homestead Air Reserve - OU
6,SiteSS-3,FL
(06/27/95)


! f ' ; 1
Reeves Southeastern
Galvanizing -OU1,FL
(10/13/92)
Stauffer Chemical Company,
FL
(12/01/95)
Whitehouse Oil Pits - i
Amendment, FL
(06/16/92)
Marine Corps Logistics Base -
OU3, PSC16&17.GA
(08/14/92)
Marzonelna/Chevron Co. - Oil
1,GA ',
(09/30/94)


Mathis Brothers Landfill - South
Marble Top Road, GA
(03/24/93)

*F'"fT- '"TW-ir?1-' "*!"'" ' * 1° "'*
Smith's Farm -OU1,'KY
(09/29/89)

Aberdeen Pesticide Dumps
(Amendment), NC
(09/30/91)
Thermal desorption




. . . if . r ' . [: 1! . i •
Solidification/
stabilization

Bioremediation
(ex situ)

it"'1' :'':' ^1IWHM|1" '^, m ,, L^3?]*1
Bioremediation:
(ex situ) -slurry-phase

Solidification/
stabilization

d't'i! \rp^ -PSJTIW!' Jf lSii;j,^i:,-^:-.p,|.
Thermal desorption




Bioremediation
(ex situ) -slurry-phase


v,. •••,,,,; ,,r . , :«j: 1 j, ,wp.« ,,,, .,«»,.,| *
Solidification/ - ;
stabilization

Solidification/
stabilization






, T . : ,












;:j »||tf ss|pn-.-(rKr n:.J,pr*








"'•'If '!'?'?! •"•r"-™1'1'
! = . '•





Yes




:•-• , -feT-jpta r
Yes





Yes


Yes


Yes



Yes




" • '•-•-''*•-»
Yes










. .., .gr--g^f -;•---- j.-..-^-..,, ;J..,



Bioremediation
(exsitu)-
composting
: : ,,;!, j. ,














r,,™t-.™,,,«H.,,»,.(»|,



Incineration
(off site)

Excavation, hauling, and landfilling as a non-RCRA solid
waste was less costly, as per the ESD issued on 1 0/22/97.
One 55-gal. drum and 1 ,350 cu yd of waste were hauled to a
non-RCRA landfill. Data in design showed reduced volume
of soil.
J«f^|F«F™'11l«f'»f »"11 «|IfMH»Bj|>» i;F.i«jK"Mlpl»i ,,vn|| •,*,,,,;pi ,„„:, ,nm:f inf.!..
Implementability (equipment pro'blems and site problems).
The PRP could not find a treatment mix that could meet
performance standards. An ESD was issued on 04/1 7/97.
The change was made to identify a specific type of ex situ
bioremediation.

1 Treatment goals could not be met. A ROD amendment was to
be issued in mid-September 1 998, and a public comment period
will be conducted.
Misinterpretation of ROD; soil was mixed with clean fill and then
disposed of at a permitted landfill. No solidification/stabilization
was performed.
Remedy was too costly, the community was opposed to the -" i
remedy, and dioxin was discovered. Therefore, the technol-
ogy was not implemented, and the soil was excavated and
disposed of at an off-site landfill. A ROD amendment was
issued on 06/1 8/97.
Excavation, landfilling, and incineration were less costly and
required less time. Soils were excavated and transported off
site for landfilling if nonhazardous, and incinerated if
hazardous.
"TP. T)S.» «|-!|l'f!= .»W(«!» ImwJi.T.- ..niqi.iv • ' f '''* |i »f>™ -1"' 'r"- ] ' '.'
Solidification/stabilization was planned for the heavy metals
remaining in the treated soils after the thermal desorption, but
the treatment was not necessary.
Arsenic is a contaminant at the site. Because the arsenic was
commingled with pesticide wastes, all soil contaminated with
arsenic was incinerated, and no soil required stabilization.
Patricia Goldberg
404-562-8543

Doyle Brittain
404-562-8549
]'* r-""1'rr1Hrr' •"• '"";
Rahdall Chaffins j
404-562-8929 |

Brad Jackson
404-562-8925

Mark File , 3
404-562-8927

Robert Pope
404-562-8506

Annie Godfrey >• >
404-562-8919 ',



Charles L King, Jr.
404-562-8931


?rn-"3- .,r--r-rfi«'.!^t«,p»|u,p,
Antonio DeAngelo !
404-562-8826 ;
• i
Kay Crane
404-562-8795

Information on the date and issuance of Explanations of Significant Differences (ESDs) and ROD Amendments is not complete.
                                                                       D-9
-------
Ninth Edition  (April 1999)  (continued)
_____ _____^^____ ______ _^____ 	 . 	 1
SITE NAME. STATE TECHNOLOGY 9TH EDITION 1
REGION (ROD DATE) (LISTED IN 8TH EDITION) ADDED | DELETED | CHANGED TO J COMMENTS CONTACTS/PHONE j
4


\ 4

4



! 4
!
!
4

4


4


; 4








Cape Fear Wood Preserving,
NC
(06/30/89)
Chemtrorocs, Inc., NC
(040/5/88)
Marine Corps Base, Camp
Lejeune-OU12,Site3-The
Old Creosote Plant, NC
(04103197)
Sodyeco-AreaC.NC
(09/24/87)

Geiger(C&MOil),SC
(6/1/87)
Kalama Specialty Chemicals,
SC
(09/28/93)
Kalama Specialty Chemicals,
SC
(09/28/93)
Savannah River (TNX Area),
SC







Soil washing


Solidification/
stabilization
Bioremediation
(ex situ) -solid-phase


Soil vapor extraction


Solidification/
stabilization
Solidification/
stabilization

Mechanical soil aeration


In situ air stripping
(air sparging)







































Yes

Yes



Yes


Yes

Yes


Yes


Yes








Thermal
desorption



























An ESD issued in 1993 changed the remedy from soil
washing to thermal desorption.

The project was canceled during the design phase, and the
site was capped.
Treatment goals could not be met during treatability testing, and
therefore bioremediation (ex situ) - solid-phase will not be
implemented. A ROD amendment that specifies disposal of the
contaminated soils in an off-site landfill is being prepared.
During installation, contaminated drums were encountered,
excavated, and removed. Contamination therefore decreased,
and SVE no longer was required.
A ROD amendment was issued on 07/13/93.

The amount of contaminated material was less than originally
estimated, so it was excavated and disposed of off site.
Contingency in ROD.
The amount of contaminated material was less than originally
estimated, so it was excavated and disposed of off site.
Contingency in ROD.
Problems with implementability (equipment problems, on site
problems) arose; development of an air recirculation well was
not possible. Areas of low permeability precluded formation of
the required recirculation cell. An ESD is to be issued in near
the future.




Jon Bomholm
404-562-8820

Jon Bomholm
404-562-8820
Gena Townsend
404-562-8538


MiehaelTownsend :
404-562-8813 !

Sheri Panabaker
404-562-8810
Steven Sandier ;
404-562-8818 '.

Steven Sandier
404-562-8818

JoaoCardoso-Neto
(Bechtel)
803452-6495

KeithA.Collinsworth
(SCDHEC)
803-89fr4055
Constance A. Jones
404-562-8551
Information on the date and issuance of Explanations of Significant Differences (ESDs) and ROD Amendments is not complete.
                                                                       D-10
-------
 Ninth Edition (April 1999) (continued)
••
1 REGION
4




4



i
4


; 4
1

4

i 4

5


,•:.-.....,
i 5
i
1
5


f -<•--- ---'•->•
I 5
1
SITE NAME, STATE
(ROD DATE)
Savannah River (USDOE) - M
AreaSettlingBasin.SC


- - i, •.
Savannah River (USDOE) -
OU1.SC
(06/29/92)


AmnicolaDumpJN
(03/30/89)

Arlington Blending and
Packaging Co., TN
(06/28/91)
Wrigley Charcoal, TN
(09/30/91)
Wrigley Charcoal, TN
(09/30/91)
Acme Solvent Reclaiming, Inc.,
IL
(12/31/90)
. . . j ^ ; - .. ,. ^ . . - i_. ,; , . i -^ ^
Belvidere Municipal Landfill -
No.1,IL
(06/29/88)
Byron/Johnson Salvage Yard,
IL
(03/13/85)
<,^!rr,,t, -:l:,rr:|f *>i-T,'-r: ryff.
Savanna Army Depot Activity,
IL
TECHNOLOGY
(LISTED IN 8TH EDITION)
In situ air stripping
(air sparging)


' '51 ,' '-',: '• JTIir- 	 	 -
Solidification/
stabilization



Solidification/
stabilization

Solidification/
stabilization

Incineration
(off site)
Solidification/
stabilization
Incineration
(off site)

PB^n.wni.r, ^., pw,, ,:- ,,,„„,, if,;
Indneration ;
(off site)

Incineration
(off site)

.sinp i1,: ii,; . n .•-•:.,-• [.(..J-WSH (i,Si iif - "i, •: !„ r -.rjnr
Solidification/
stabilization
9
ADDED













f.. ,}! . . ... , . . .









-3.,^,f,,~fHn.-:;.imf:'






•i;,-;- !',-!$•;:, tHF M 'IRStfjF .;'1S *


TH EDITlOfi
DELETED
Yes



i
Yes




Yes


Yes


Yes

Yes

Yes


r" -' ; -,ro
Yes


Yes


T»..-™-irq;,
Yes

I
CHANGED TO




	 - -













,-• :ii -IF ':!• : ; ..il, .= •




S' f ,11 ., t. iM»SF,.f<'- , . ,1|!!J1.






^rt^r.w.iw-f.WYJ^.t.-.L


IHHHMHHM
1 COMMENTS
This is a demonstration project, not a full-scale application.



'i' If--' -':' :• • : I' Bin™ .:••- ! i .•,--.•., , , i , "ITJ nl- i r -
The work was completed as a RCRA project that is not !
applicable to the ASR.



The volume of soil was much less than had been indicated in
the ROD, and it was more cost-effective to dispose of the soil
off site.
The estimated volume of contaminated media has decreased;
the technology no longer is effective. An ESD is to be issued in
near future.
The technology was too expensive; disposed of off site in a
landfill. A ROD amendment was issued on 02/02/95.
The technology was too expensive; disposed of off site in a
landfill. A ROD amendment was issued on 02/02/95.
The ROD identifies off-site incineration as a contingency. The
technology was never implemented.

„,. ,r!| ,,, -llr „ ,„,,,„,:„„„,., n-pfj,,,,-,,^ .TJrt-.il 1- r--mf,- ."I.-.T1 .,1
Incineration off site was included in the ROD to be used if the
concentration of PCBs was greater than 50 ppm. Because the
concentration was not, PCBs were disposed of off site.
Excavation, hauling, and landfilling were used instead of off-
site incineration as indicated in the ROD because of high cost.

i^ •il.ipBtlifW'.ir™! «r , .:,, .^ -„ f ,-,„., .n f Tvur-p.-i fff • r,T,.:- iH,i-.rr.r.nr
This project is a RCRA closure - state oversight.

HHHHH
CONTACTS/PHONE
••^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^••MM^^^^^^^
Mike Simmons (DOE)
803-725-1627
Brian Looney (WSRC)
803-725-1627
- , r,- •„ :t - , -, in ' -,
Mike Simmons (DOE)
803-725-1627 ;

Brian Looney (WSRC) I
803-7253692
Robert West
404-562-8806

Derek Matory :
404-562-8800

L'saMontalvo
404-562-8805
LisaMontalvo
404-562-8805 i
David LJnnear
312-886-1841

.111,', .!- -••,»
William Ballard ': :
312-353-6083 i

Bill Bolen
312-353-6316

,;|ilv , , p.,..., ,:,,,:,,..„„,„,,,
David Seely !
312-886-7058 i
Information on the date and issuance of Explanations of Significant Differences (ESDs) and ROD Amendments is not complete.
                                                                       D-11
-------
Ninth  Edition (April 1999) (continued)
IS1TP NAMF, STATE TECHNOLOGY 9TH EDITION
REGION {ROD DATE) (LISTED IN 8TH EDITION) ADDED i DELETED
5
i 5
5

5
5
: 5
5

: 5
5
Ftsher-Calo, IN
(08/07/90)
Main Street Well Field, IN
(03/29/91)
Wayne Waste Oil, IN
(03/30/90)

Wayne Waste Oil, IN
(03/30/90)
Wedzeb.lN
(06/30/89)
Berlin & Farro Liquid Incinera-
tion, Ml
(02/29/84)
Burrows Sanitation, Ml
(09/30/86)
"i '• : ' •
Carter Industrials, Inc., Ml
(09/18/91)
Clare Water Supply, Ml
(09/16/92)
Soil vapor extraction
Incineration
(offsRe)
Bioremediation
pn situ)

Solidification/
stabilization
Incineration
(off site)
Incineration
(off site)
Solidification/
stabilization
T f • • .-.-.-..
Incineration
(off site) :
Thermal desorption












Yes


Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes

Yes
Yes
•"^"•"••••••"•••••••••"""^
CHANGED TO COMMENTS CONTACTS/PHONE 1
Bioremediation
(in situ) -
biosparging

Bioremediation
(in situ) -
biosparging








Biosparging was determined to be more effective than SVE;
no ROD amendment or ESD has been issued.
Off-site incineration was never implemented at this site.
The technology has been reclassified.
n i i - • :• :r
The technology was determined to be unnecessary. Metals
were the only contaminants of concern, and the site had been
capped already. Consequently, the risk was minimized. No
ROD amendment or ESD was written.
52,000 drums of PCB capacitors were incinerated off site in
1 987 at the Apptus facility in Kansas. Soil was excavated and
disposed of off site because the contamination remaining in soil
was low. No ROD amendment or ESD was issued.
Contingency in the ROD. ROD specified transportation of PCB
liquid wastes, if any, to an approved off-site incinerator.
The volume of contamination was smaller than originally had
been estimated. It was more cost-effective to excavate and
dispose of off site under removal authority.
- r r -:.; -r ] - ,• ,-| I • :• [ • • '.; '•- - r • I
1 991 ROD specified thermal desorption, not incineration off-site.
Misinterpretation of ROD. Amended ROD 2/28/95 canceled
remedy because the cost for off-site disposal dropped, there
was less soil, and restrictions on interstate transport have
decreased.
The remedy should have been listed as SVE. The 1992 ROD
specified SVE, not thermal desorption, but SVE was not
feasible because of the low permeability of soils. A ROD
amendment was issued on 05/15/97.
Jeffrey Gore
312-886-6552
Deborah Orr
312-886-7576
Jeffrey Gore
312-886-6552
i -i
Jeffrey Gore !
312-886-6552 l
Kenneth Theisen
312-886-1959
RobertWhippo
312-8864759
Jeffrey Gore
312-886-6552
' i
Jon Peterson
312-353-1264
Jon Peterson
312-353-1264
Information on the date and issuance of Explanations of Significant Differences (ESDs) and ROD Amendments is not complete.
                                                                      D-12
-------
Ninth Edition (April  1999)  (continued)

REGION
5



5




5

iv^-'r



5



«n~vm





5




>l

\' r , : "'" :
. ••' . .; ;':-,;

||HH|^|^|^|^|^HH^H
COMMENTS
The volume of contaminated material was much smaller than
originally had been estimated. Consequently, it was more
cost-effective to excavate and dispose of the material off site.
A ROD amendment was to be issued in FY98.
i^i5^s^^|^^.a|^^^f^HJ»^,!|ai3i|^|^,apr!|.iFfi.«riHrri?-|; T,fi^fp^p¥^|p5T|FTf«rii
Solidification/stabilizatfon was identified as a contingency i ;
remedy in the 1992 ROD. If cleanup goals are not achieved
by the SVE system, the soils will be excavated and stabilized.
The SVE system is in operation and its performance will be
reviewed next year.
An ESD is to be issued in the near future.

The site was capped with clay and covered with asphalt so that
the property could be redeveloped. Two ROD amendments
have been issued. The first, issued on 09/29/95, removed
solidification/stabilization from the project.
The concentrations of the contaminants in the soil were low and
it was not cost-effective to treat the soil with incineration. The
metals could not be treated with incineration. The contaminated
soil was excavated and disposed of off site.
frp*?P'T'H 	 T-1™1^?™™"^?!^*^"^^^
The technology^ ex situ, ^not in sMlfGrdurtdwate'r is Being •
pumped and treated above ground. : :




Incineration was too expensive.




Incineration was too expensive. Chemical oxidation may be
used to treat highly contaminated soils, and land treatment
will be used for lower concentrations; the use of off site
incineration would move the risk outside the site. An ESD is to
be issued.
§••^•1
CONTACTS/PHONE
Lolita Hill
312-353-1621


Karen SiRora-i
312-886-1843



Elizabeth Reiner
312-353-6576
TimothyPrendiville
312-886-5122


James Hahnenberg
312-3534213


Darryl Owens ! ]
312-886-7089

Miriam Horneff
(MPCA)
612-296-7228
Ted Smith
312-353-6571

John Moeger (MPCA)
612-296-9707
Ramon Torres^! : "
312-886-3010
' 'I']''.

^ :l*;
Information on the date and issuance of Explanations of Significant Differences (ESDs) and ROD Amendments is not complete.
                                                                       D-13
-------
Ninth Edition  (April 1999)  (continued)
SITE NAME, STATE TECHNOLOGY 9TH EDITION
REGION (ROD DATE) {LISTED IN 8TH EDITION) ADDED I DELETED I CHANGED TO
5
5
5
5
5

5
6
6
Allied Chem & Ironton Coke,
OH
(12/28/90)
Reids Brook, OH
(09/30/86)
Summit National Liquid
Disposal Service -Amendment,
OH
(11/02/90)
Mid-State Disposal Landfill, Wl
(09/30/88)
Onalaska Municipal Landfill, Wl
(08/14/90)

Spickler Landfill, Wl :
(06/03/92)
Gurley Pit, AR
(10/06/86)
Popile, AR
(02/01/93)
Incineration
(on site)
None
Incineration
(off site)
Solidification/
stabilization
Bioremediation
(in situ)

Solidification/
stabilization
Incineration
(off site)
Bioremediation
(ex situ)









\fes

Yes
Yes


Yes
Yes





Bioremediation
(in situ) -
bioventing



Bioremediation
(ex situ) -
land treatment
•^•^^^••••^••^
COMMENTS CONTACTS/PHONE
Contaminated soil volume decreased. A ROD amendment
was to be issued in May or June 1998. Soil contaminated with
soft tar will be excavated, soil that meets the TCLP limit will be
recycled for alternative fuel, and soil that fails the TCLP limit
will be disposed of at an off-site landfill.
The original remedy in the 1986 ROD was not listed in the
ASR. The 1986 ROD specified solidification of sediments.
EPA issued and ESD on 08/15/97 changed solidification to
disposal.
The 1988 ROD and the 1990 ROD amendment both
specified incineration on site. It is documented as a project
under the 1988 ROD.
Solidification/stabilization was identified as a contingency that
was to be used only to solidify the sludge lagoon so that a cap
could be placed over it. Solidification/ stabilization was
deemed unnecessary. A geomembrane cap was used without
solidification/ stabilization.
The technology was reclassified from bioremediation in situ to
bioventing.

Results of a test of stabilization/solidification showed that the
technology would not provide a significant reduction in the
mobility or hydraulic conductivity of mercury wastes. An
impermeable cap with synthetic liner was used to eliminate
infiltration.
The cost was too high; transportation and safety problems
also arose.
The Rl data is being reviewed to determine whether there is a
more appropriate remedy. The site was capped under a
removal action. FS decisions will be made in 1999.
Matthew Mankowski
312-886-1842
TereseVanDonsal
312-353-6564
Anthony Rutter
312-886-8961
MaryTierney
312-8864785
George Mickelson
PDNR)
608-267-0858
Kevin Adler
312-886-7078
JohnFagiolo
312-886-0800 ;
Ernest R. Franke
214-665-8521
Shawn Ghose •
214-665-6782
Information on the date and issuance of Explanations of Significant Differences (ESDs) and ROD Amendments is not complete.
                                                                       D-14
-------
Ninth Edition  (April 1999)  (continued)
SITE NAME, STATE TECHNOLOGY 9TH EDITION
REGION (ROD DATE) (LISTED IN 8TH EDITION) ADDED DELETED I CHANGED TO COMMENTS CONTACTS/PHONE
6
! 6
I
j
i
6
l^-gspJfV. ifM
6
6
~- , • ;---M(JT- "—.T-J
6
!
6
Popile, AR
(02/01/93)
Vertac,lnc.,AR
(06/30/93)
Vertac, lnc.-OnsiteOU1,AR
(05/25/95)
"1™"' ] ]ir . ifp?f|r>f,'''F:'.-iT?Y'''*1'?1 :•
Bayou iBonfouca- Source 1
Control OU (Amendment), LA
(07/20/95)
Pab Oil & Chemical Services,
Inc., LA
(09/22/93)
;-:[-; -)r;--rr"-fp-,^n".Tlffjpji=;:..^tf;;> ip
TO ROD: amendment (07/20/95) actually covered the off-site
incineration of waste from the Southern Shipbuilding Corpora-
tion site. Therefore, no waste from Bayou Bonfouca was
incinerated off site or addressed by this ROD amendment.
Bioremediation was discontinued because of implementability
problems. An ESD was issued on 03/1 2/1 997.
I :; a.t,r: it, ,,f ,,a,,ff ., ..^i ,.p=rs,,,F,,ip-, „-,,, .,„•,•,,(,»,,,». h.prj.JfJIKr . :
No information1 available. ; ! M: -
. - ,i • . :
The type of bioremediation was clarified; there was no actual
remedy change.
Shawn Ghose
214-665-6782
.<• .r t|»;f T .fy-M'iir^-5.v-!s - -ryi-^' -=-,
Phillip Allen i
214-665-8516 !
MikeArjmandi (ADPCE)
501-682-0852
Phillip Allen
214665-8516
,-ur. r--'.'£ '«v-CTri!. ^.^
MarkHanseni ' v:;
214665-7548 i i
Caroline Ziegler
214^65-2178
v::rrf:j-.f."---^m-" •• • " ~ f'.;' ~
Donald H.Williams i
214-665-2197
Kelly Dixon (ODEQ)
405-702-5141
Earl Hendrick
214-665-8519
Information on the date and issuance of Explanations of Significant Differences (ESDs) and ROD Amendments is not complete.
                                                                       D-15
-------
Ninth Edition  (April 1999)  (continued)
SITE NAME. STATE TECHNOLOGY 9TH EDITION
REGION (ROD DATE) (LISTED IN 8TH EDITION) ADDED I DELETED I CHANGED TO
6
: 6
<
6
6
I
6
6
6

| 6
6

Bailey Waste Disposal, TX
(06/28/88)
Brio Refining, TX
(03/31/88)

Kelly Air Force Base -Site
11 00, Phase II, TX
Kelly Air Force Base -Site
1100, Phase III, TX
Petro-Chemical Systems, Inc.-
OU2.TX
(04/30/98)
Petrochemical (Turtle-Bayou),
TX
(09/06/91)
Sheridan Disoposal Services,
TX
(12/29/88)
South Cavalcade Street, TX
(09/26/88)
South Cavalcade Street, TX
(09/26/88)

Solidification/
stabilization
Solidification/
stabilization

This phase is an addition
to the phase listed in the
eighth edition.
This phase is an addition
to the phase listed in the
eighth edition.
This is an FY98 ROD that
was not listed in the eighth
edition.
• • ., ., , fvf: - r ,
Incineration
(off site)
Solidification/
stabilization

Incineration
(off site)
Soil washing




Soil vapor
extraction
Bioremediation
(in situ)-
bioventing
Thermal
desorption






Yes
Yes





Yes

Yes
Yes







Soil vapor
extraction





•••••••••^••il^HBHH
COMMENTS CONTACTS/PHONE
Cost too high; treatment goals could not be met; more
contamination than planned. New remedy includes
excavation and offslte disposal of problematic wastes and
installation of a geocomposite cap over mixed industrial and
municipal wastes. ROD Amendment 12/16/96.
Solidification/ stabilization was considered during the RI/FS
stages, but was not included in the ROD because it could not
meet treatment levels. No ROD Amendment or BSD therefore
was necessary.
No information available.
No information available.

Misinterpretation of ROD. SVE currently is being used to
remediate four soil areas at the site.
Misinterpretation of the ROD.

The 09/26/88 ROD listed incineration (off site) for sludges, if
encountered. However, no sludges were not found and
therefore incineration was not performed.
A pilot study of soil washing showed that 40 percent of the
volume could not be washed to meet goals. Soils contaminated
with carcinogenic PAHs at levels higher than 700 ppm will be
sealed and contained beneath a six-inch-thick reinforced
concrete cap. A ROD amendment was issued on 06/27/97.
Chris Wlarreal
214-665-6758
John Meyer
214-665-6742

Bill Hall
210-9253100
Bill Hall
210-9253100 I
Chris Villarreal
214^65^758
Chris Villarreal
21^665^758 :
GaryA.Baumgarten
214-665-6749

Glenn Celerier ;
214-665-8523
Glenn Celerier
214-665-8523

Information on the date and issuance of Explanations of Significant Differences (ESDs) and ROD Amendments is not complete.
                                                                       D-16
-------
Ninth  Edition  (April 1999)  (continued)
SITE NAME, STATE TECHNOLOGY 9TH EDITION
REGION (ROD DATE) (LISTED IN 8TH EDITION) ADDED 1 DELETED 1 CHANGED TO COMMENTS CONTACTS/PHONE
6


	 .,.„._, T
i 7

j

1
7



,,... , ,-•-->, .,,,
7




7

",„•£• -^T^r =,'-£' $
i ' " !' ' '' !
j " 7' '

8


;«|||r«»T™«f|i»
!i ' 8' '''
.

8




South Cavalcade Street, TX
(09/26/88)

«rnr= •! r^^Riir- 4P ^y#r-s.r,.-r:i-,iii 	
Micfwest Manufacturing/North
Farm (Amendment), IA
(09/30/93)


Strother Field Industrial Park,
KS
(03/31/94)

r|!Tll- :(f) I T.irtjl ilifl n,q«l|lr-| • V\~
Ellisviile Site -Bliss/MO •'•''
(09/29/86)



Missouri Electric Works, MO
(09/28/90)
.,,,,fjr ( ,« .-^-i-iT"" n.|«'-Tfsv;TntT--ISfT"- ml-i imt®— — T- ----
Solidification/ "
stabilization



Soil vapor extraction



- ^ HI-MI 1"1 :™nirj'i>", '• -.: -r-. •
Indneration •':••'•'. :
(off site) =



Incineration
(on site)
,ayi jiijSftiflira; f p«^r«S»f 'T'l-t"*S^^'||Wli ^.'M I"1

Solidification/ ' '
stabilization
Bioremediation
(in situ) - groundwater

.•.i(l|iil.!iliBl(tl!'ni.i»*iniT'i'»">«'*-f=''}i^"
Bioremediation ;
(in situ) -other

Soil vapor extraction







_-. ., 	 _, .; 	









-T--.; 	 .-7-7 >-:-rrr— ,"







':?ar'«ir;.!!*={£'sb"fset-T?j-'i !••






!, If : l! ' ' .1 T








Yes



Yes




Yes



>.~-")JT,| '-, -ili'







^..l-a^-'s^i i-i'ip.1

:Yes




p.H.jC.a.fTS.J,











. , .. ^_,. -lr ..- ,-.- -. , , --









,._,,. ,-,- — -, ,rrfl- .,._





Thermal
desorption
;.!f-|l-avi---n ; -^p™!i F-|5Ll!B1!-^

' '. ' , : 1

Bioremediation
(in situ) -
bioventing
m :-i,«,.|pnyiii«i,-, -«™p
Bioremedi-ation
(in situ) -
bioventing
Thermal
desorption



Estimated volume of contaminated soil much less than
anticipated, but treatment goals could not be reached anyway.
Will cap the site instead. ROD Amendment issued 6/27/97.
^Ti;F^fri:i^-|nrTin*TFin;*'!i-N.F'P'rlli 	 :»f .=-' ,ifilnrf:f --.pi'irT 51 -'stflnpri|!> jrfir-. :,r;<~ im^gr
The cost wasloo high; contaminanMevels foriboth iOUs were
lower than before. Site risks were evaluated to determine that
monitoring with institutional controls would effectively address
the contamination at both OUs. The original ROD was issued
in 1988.
The application of SVE technology is impractical at this site
because the soil permeability is too low. The remedy proposed
in the ESD is a pump-and-treat system with monitored natural
attenuation. An ESD was to be issued by 09/30/98.
'aii«i"!|lW1i<*l' If ", '«»•' >-1tp"W">'*f»l» p*i»- f»!"'' Mj-0|»r:.:i-r.«prf-»'if«:n----
The 1 986 ROD called for interim'storage of contaminated soil
on site and incineration at an off-site commercial facility. The
1 991 ROD called for off-site incineration at the Times Beach,
MO site operated by the PRPs. A ROD amendment was
issued on 09/30/91.
On-site incineration was too expensive. A ROD amendment
was issued in September 1 995.
w-i-iitir-iss-istefliiijfrpiri1?: $~ " & ,i'isfi>ir^'¥s:?r .-^ i,t ?:fi. T-T.?£.Ki-f"ij! "K irTi.-^rraj naitr :T^ "s,hsa

Misinterpretation of the ROD. :

The remedy was changed to bioventing in the ESD issued on
03/24/95. The pump-and-treat system did not work with
LNAPLs; therefore, the cost of implementing it would be high.
«rr&7rfjr*;|[sftW:hi!^T^!f'i^^ .fff;1'1
The technology was; reclassified, ; i ';'! H
:;: • '• :.;: • ': -: : ;

SVE will not be used. All soil will be excavated and treated by
thermal desorption. Doing so will allow the site owner to
reduce risk, eliminate the need for post-closure care, and
clean-close the unit.

Glenn Celerier
214-665-8523

-HmiiiF!lrfTrt^m¥g. n F ., (1 1 r,^ ^it _,r -£.~ .^
Diane Easley ;
913-551-7797
: !


Paul Roemerman
913-551-7694


-rrf
-------
Ninth Edition (April 1999) (continued)
SITE NAME. STATE TECHNOLOGY 9TH EDITION |
REGION {ROD DATE) (LISTED IN 8TH EDITION) ADDED I DELETED I CHANGED TO COMMENTS
| 	 •'•••• 	 	 •"" • 	 ' • • "•• 	 • 	 • 	 |" 	 •( 	 •"• 	 • 	 •••••• 	 • 	 • 	 • 	 • 	
8


i 8


|
8



8

8

i ' • '
\ 8

"
8




i i.-.:;.--| . 	
! 8
i


8


Rocky Mountain Arsenal - OU
17, CO
(05/14/90)
Rocky Mountain Arsenal - OU
28,00
(01/15/93)

Rocky Mountain Arsenal - OU
29,00
(01/15/93)

Sand Creek Industrial, CO
(09/28/90)
Summitville Mine - OU 0, CO
(12/15/94)
- a • • -i -i •
Burlington Northern (Somers
Plant) -Soil, Base -OU 4, UT
(06/14/94)
Montana Pole and Treating
Plant- Soil OU,MT
(09/21/93)


j-rfl :!lF1,;ii -rfjlli .,:' |V". 1 . :i.sB-si-Jj-fl-~ " ' "• '
Silver Bow Creek/Bufte Area -
Rocker Timber Framing and
Treatment Plant OU, MT
(06/30/92)
Ellsworth AFB - Abandoned
Fire Protection Area, SD
(05/10/96)
Solidification/
stabilization

Solidification/
stabilization


Incineration
(off site)


Incineration
(off site)
Neutralization

: i • -, . •.. i i .- -
Bioremediation
(in situ) - other

Bioremediation
(in situ) - other



.fiirw.i| 1 rip H--I1-. r ] - --e- ,11
Solidification/
stabilization


Soil vapor extraction

















i [| • - , -:-








• •'< 	 •-<' i .»







Yes


Yes



Yes



Yes

Yes


Yes


Yes




1 ,! - j ••>! H .•
Yes



Yes


























i ,.•- ., ;;,.- ,|







The ROD was misinterpreted.


OU 28 was the evaluation of alternatives for treatment of
various future waste streams at RMA. Solidification/
stabilization was considered, but no actions were taken under
OU28.
OU 29 was an interim remedial action to address PCB wastes.
Both off-site incineration and off-site landfilling were selected as
the most preferable alternatives for disposal of PCB wastes.
The PCB wastes were ultimately disposed of by landfilling.
No information is available.

The ROD was misinterpreted.

•I- , . -,, ,-•- : • , Tii-ii-.n : ,-r -r-i i • "1 • , 1 • • , • -„ 111-1
The ROD was misinterpreted. ;


The ROD was misinterpreted.




• i f M .-.&.-.; =,si am pi, i B|i^ .-;•] 't I. -r ;iff'i- r I '••:•? • -w ti'i--
Solidification/stabilization treatment was recommended only if
chemical treatment was not successful. The estimated volume
of contaminated media had decreased; the technology was no
longer effective.
The FY96 ROD only expanded the dual phase system from
the FY95 ROD, but did not add any technologies.

CONTACTS/PHONE
	 • 	 • 	 1
Laura Williams
303-312-6660

Laura Williams >
303-312-6660 :


Laura Williams
303312-6660


Erna Waterman
303-312-6762 j
Victor Ketallappet
303-312-6528
,| :r:r- ;-r -- - • :r '- • "-T,
James C. Harris
406-441-1150 i

James C. Harris
406-441-1150

Neil Marsh (MT)
406-444-1420
|-£rii -. if .•R.TrH.^i/^iVii-i * , -T .
MikeSishop ?':: ;
406-44M150i I


Peter Ismert
303-312-6665

Information on the date and issuance of Explanations of Significant Differences (ESDs) and ROD Amendments is not complete.
                                                                       D-18
-------
Ninth  Edition (April 1999) (continued)
SITF NAME, STATE TECHNOLOGY 9™ EDITION
REGION (ROD DATE) (LISTED IN 8TH EDITION) ADDED DELETED] CHANGED TO COMMENTS CONTACTS/PHONE
8




i^svf r "sn,er- .rvn
8


9





[•' ' 9'!f

9

wnsK-fil 'Sp'i 1 $nf»ii"
f;:iU.:;l ,,\




9


p*r--*«r
I
1
9


Hill Air Force Base -OU 4, UT
(06/14/94)



Utah Power & U'ght/Ameridan:
Barrel, UT
(07/07/93)
Fairchild Semiconductor (Mt.
View)-Bldg1-4(515&545N.
WhismanRd./313 Fairchild
Dr.), CA
(06/30/89)

FMC Corp! '(Fresno Plant), CA:
(06/28/91)
Intel, Mountian View, CA
(06/09/89)
.^.,m(^-jiiJij>!.|-si-|nl,iBija.nrnifl-ssi(sriH •« rfesre^iKp
J.HJBaxter;CA
(09/27/90)



Koppers (Oroville Plant), CA
(09/13/89)

MarctrAFB-oli,Area5&
Site4,;CA
(06/20/96)
March AFB-OU1, Area 5 &
Site4,CA
(06/20/96)
Soil vapor extraction




Incineration ' Ml
(off site) • ' I
i i :i
Soil vapor extraction





'Solidification/ ;
stabilization
Mechanical soil aeration

rmifP'f-WWi1* iWuaiRiiifir S| !'«*• 5E ' i'*?^ nfi ".ti"
Bioremediation
(ex situ) -land treatment



Solidification/
stabilization

Bioremediation
(in situ) - bioventing

Thermal desorption







*r,,«T,.t-«T-








•"*•" 	 -"-iff™



S.T...H '!f-i ? .'i^i'usiSjMiBU iiitrsr








ffi - r T'





Yes




Yes


Yes





''Yds

Yes

i.sBss^.-wq^^iS'i^i.j





Yes


Yes










"If 1,1 .]..-!.»-!, ffiJ-x,-








•'t-vt^fwi1-?^'*



i- :;- .Mrs- |i'i..vS^. •.!.' .'S s
Bioremediation
(in situ) -
bioventing











The bottom half of the landfill is below the water table, and the
landfill does not have a slurry wall to divert groundwater flow
from it. Therefore, SVE technology could not be implemented.
A series of 3 trenches collects leachate from the landfill.

^^wrpriT'nR^iirrrsi'^^
Off-site incineration was specified as:a contingent remedy but •
never was implemented. i
' ' : " : :
The water table rose and is now too high for SVE to be
effective. A pump-and- treat system currently is being used.
No ROD amendment or ESD was issued.



Removediffem proposed NPL iistihg; i!';''1

Soil was excavated and shipped off site.

-•- q,;f[-!'»:»6--ij,^TF=i^,lK-!ffliS!p^i™p1iaEifji,^| runM-sr raavTtirrnp-r-f irj1 r i.^i."i[i^.pe%fiH;i«ia^(ief^JSf >\
Exsitu bioremediation was replaced with in situ bioremedia-
tion. Landfarming may be used; biomass culture was added
to contaminated soil. ESD issued 3/27/98.


Treatment goals could not be met. The concentrations of
dioxins were sufficiently high that solidification/ stabilization was
not feasible. A ROD amendment was issued on 08/29/96.
No information available. ' ; : ;


No information available.


Dr. Dan Atkins (DoD)
801-775-2559

RobStites
303-312-6664
PaulaBchmittdiel :
303-312-6861

Dennis Curran
Smith Env. Tech. Corp.
415-960-1640

Eugenia Chow
415-744-2258
^Cynthia Wefmdre V '•'§'.'
415-744-2234 ' :j! j
Eugenia Chow
418-744-2258
•II Ijf'H' ':":''*; * '•'•'<'*?••• .^.^^''ill^i'f^ifjffj^f
KathySetian
415-744-2254

Beatriz Bofill
415-744-2235
Charles Berrey
415-744-2223

Richard Russell - -- ! -
415-744-2406

Richard Russell
415-744-2406

Information on the date and issuance of Explanations of Significant Differences (ESDs) and ROD Amendments is not complete.
                                                                       D-19
-------
Ninth Edition (April  1999) (continued)
REGION
9

9
9
9
9
! 9
i
i
9
i 9

SITE NAME, STATE
(ROD DATE)
Mather AFB- Soil and
Groundwater OU/Smaller UST
Sites, CA

McColl.CA
(06/30/93)
Purity Oil Sales, Inc., CA
(09/26/89)
Raytheon, Mountain View, CA
(06/09/89)
Roseville Drums, CA
(03/03/88)
Sacramento Army Depot, CA
(01/17/95)
Southern California Edison,
Visalia Pole Yard, CA
(06/10/94)
Southern California Edison,
Visalia Pole Yard - Groundwa-
ter OU.CA
(06/10/94)

TECHNOLOGY
(LISTED IN 8TH EDITION)
Bioremediation
(in situ)
r . i - =- i .... -
Solidification/
stabilization
Solidification/
stabilization
Mechanical soil aeration
Bioremediation
(in situ)
Solidification/
stabilization
Bioremediation
(in situ) - groundwater
f! '''7 r 	 •••'""'• ' '•*':
Bioremediation
(in situ) - groundwater

9
ADDED










TH EDITION
DELETED


Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes

Yes

CHANGED TO
Bioremediation
(in situ) -
bioventing
,i



Bioremediation
(in situ) -
bioventing
•'{•} '•'" r '"
Thermally
enhanced
recovery


COMMENTS
The technology was reclassled from bioremediation in situ to
bioventing.
• .' 1 ' - M ' ; ir
Technology had implementation problems. EPA selected the
contingency remedy of RCRA-equh/alent closure for the sump
wastes. Pilot and full-scale treatability studies were conducted
during 1 994 and 1 995 to determine the feasibility of solidifica-
tion/stabilization.
The reason for deletion of the technology is unknown. An ESD
was issued in 1995, and capping was performed at the site.
L, •. - - = r i i - •»- nf =.'- ' ' T'pr 111 -I «,! r i • 'i
Soil was excavated and shipped off site for disposal, j
The technology was reclassified from bioremediation in situ to
bioventing.
The 1995 ROD was a base-wide ROD. It reiterated the S/S
remedy specified in the 3/29/93 ROD. It did not add another
S/S project. Hence there is only one S/S project at SAD.
The remedy was implemented as a contingency. The remedy is
actually "dynamic underground stripping." Treatment goals could
not be met because concentrations were too high for bioreme-
diation to work in a timely manner.
-I • • ;| ••» l^' :; > f * ".i II ;'[|; IF Til | , • : jl
The remedy implemented was aicontingency. Concentrations
were too high. Bioremediation could not achieve cleanup
levels in a realistic time frame.

CONTACTS/PHONE
Kathleen Salyer
415-744-2214
Terry Winsor (Montgomery
Watson)
916-231-4430

Patti Coins
415-744-2229 ;
Rosemarie Caraway
415-744-2231
"•""' •"•" ' ni1 • 	 i
Eugenia Chow
415-244-2258 I
Bradley Shipley
415-744-2287
Marlon Mezquita
415-744-1499
Richard Procunier
415-744-2219
Emmanuel Mensall
(CADTSC)
916-255-3704
Richard Procunier;1
415-744-2219 ||
Emmanuel Mensall :
(CADTSC)
916-255-3704 '
Information on the date and issuance of Explanations of Significant Differences (ESDs) and ROD Amendments is not complete.
                                                                       D-20
-------
Ninth  Edition (April 1999) (continued)
SITF IMF CTAT|: TFr.Hwni nfiY 9TH EDITION
REGION (ROD DATE) (LISTED IN 8TH EDITION) ADDED [DELETED CHANGED TO
m^^^^^m
9

10

10

10


10





10

10




'•" ' '}!

^^^••^^^^^••^^^^^^••^^^^^^
Valley Wood Preserving, Inc.,
CA
(09/27/91)
FAANorthwayiStation.AK

FAA Strawberry Point Station,
AK

FortWainwright:OU1-
Chemical Agent Dump Site, AK
(07/20/95)
^l/» l*-\Jl\S\Jf

U.S. DOE Idaho National
Engineering and Environmental
Lab - OU 23, ID



ft 1- in >!,«-,-
McCormick and Baxter ;j
Creosoting Company (Portland
Plant), OR
(03/29/96)
Union Pacific Railroad Tire
Treatment, OR
(03/27/96)


American' Crossarm & Conduit
WA :
(06/30/93)
Solidification/
stabilization

Bioremediation
(in situ)

Bioremediation
(in situ)

Neutralization


Solidification/
stabilization




-f-Tllf'fiffr' 'rn i« ij I * ~ ' - " ' L"
Solidification/
stabilization

Bioremediation
(in situ)



"••; .: p ' ;- '-•< i! : 1 " ' ' i
Solidification/ '
stabilization
'- -'•:•-














_,,... .,-,-,, 	 ,:,-.-.









Yes





-W-W...JM
Yes







_-,,. — -
Yes






Yes



Bioremediation
(in situ) -
groundwater
Bioremediation
(in situ) -
biosparging



Vitrification




f ~'-,tf^mmt"t f' -


Bioremediation
(in situ) -
bioventing


- ,1.,! |^,-H
.. ,'-' .:: ••;••••
HH|HHHHMH|HHH|HH|
COMMENTS CONTACTS/PHONE
The estimated volume of contaminated media had decreased;
the technology was no longer effective. A ROD amendment is
to be issued in near future.
The technology was reclassified. ;•'• ] :

The technology was reclassified.

Non-invasive geophysical investigations indicated the presenbe
of buried chemical agents. However, when excavation was
completed, the agents were undetectable.


Solidification/stabilization was never used at the site.




•jwmni ni •»*[?«*•'• 15 w^rji'i f T'f"' l!'''?'"; ' iiT'fH'^T1.11:''"' ""'~"';
Treatment goals could not be!met. Decided to dispose offsite.
The excavated soil contaminated with F-listed waste will be
disposed offsite at a landfill. ROD Amendment to be issued in
1998.
Reclassified technology.




' !:"™ "*" ' " **1'Tr-: 1 ;' ii
Excavated and transported contaminated soil to a landfill in
Arlington, OR. Flyash was added to absorb moisture. ROD
called for the material to be solidified off site.
Michelle Lau
415-744-2227

Daniel McKay
603-646-4738

Daniel McKay
603-6464738

David Williams (USAGE) : '
907-753-5657
DianneSoderlund
907-271-3425
Terrell Smith Lockheed
Marietta GW Restoration
r\_-.t
uept.
208-526-5692
Wayne Pierre
206-553-7261
•p- «T'!p"»'« «[»•'• P[I |;P'?
-------
Ninth Edition (April 1999) (continued)
1 REGION
10
; 10
10
10
10
f
I 10
10
I 10
SITE NAME, STATE
(ROD DATE)
Commencement Bay, South
Tacoma Reid, WA
(09/29/94)
IL
Commencement Bay, South
Tacoma Reid, WA
(09/29/94)
Harbor Island (Lead), WA
(09/30/93)
Queen City Farms, WA
(10/24/85)
Western Processing Co., Inc.,
WA
1 ; | -I.',':- fl] f
Western Processing Co., Inc. -
ESD, WA
(12/11/95)
Western Processing Co., Inc. -
Phase I, WA
(08/05/84)
Western Processing Co., Inc. -
Phase II, WA
(09/25/85)
TECHNOLOGY 9TH EDITION
(LISTED IN 8TH EDITION) ADDED | DELETED] CHANGED TO COMMENTS
Soil vapor extraction
In situ air stripping
(air sparging)
Incineration
(off site)
None
Thermal desorption
'• - rn ' .i
Bioremediation
(in situ) -other
Incineration
(off site)
; [ r , - ,
Solidification/
stabilization

i:
Solidification/
Stabilization


Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes



-
The plume was smaller than had been estimated; contamina-
tion levels have decreased. SVE was discussed as an option
but never implemented.
The plume smaller than had been estimated; contaminafi on
levels have decreased. Air sparging was never implemented,
and no ROD amendment or ESD was issued.
Contaminated soil was disposed of at a hazardous waste
disposal facility. The technology was a contingency in the ROD.
This remedy was not listed in the ASR.
Contaminated soil was excavated and transported off site to a
landfill in Arlington, OR. The remedy was contingent and never
implemented.
- i • -i -;> t: :. - r: t i • . i -- - ;
Natural attenuation already was occurring at site.
Bioremediation would not enhance the degradation of contami-
nants. An ESD will be issued to note the change.
Contaminated soil was excavated and disposed of off site.
Incineration was not required. The specified remedy in the ROD
was off-site disposal or incineration, so no amendment or ESD
was required.
'!-• :-r.-=-: ' . i - r- y; ;nrr f i ' . ,n . --.
The technology never was specified in trie ROD as the
preferred remedy and therefore never was used at the site.
Ryash was added to the soil to absorb moisture for easy
transportation. The soil was excavated and disposed of off site.
Information on the date and issuance of Explanations of Significant Differences (ESDs) and ROD Amendments is not complete.
CONTACTS/PHONE
Garni Grandinetti
206-553-8696
Cami Grandinetti
206-553-8696
Keith A. Rose
206-553-7721
Neil Thompson
206-553-7177
Lee Marshall
206-553-2723
Lee Marshall •
206553-2723 ;
Lee Marshall
206-553-2723
Lee Marshall
206-553-2723

                                                    D-22
-------
Eighth Edition (November 1996):  Additions, Changes, and Deletions from the Seventh Edition (September 1995)


The eighth edition of this report added information about 38 innovative treatment technologies selected for remedial action under FY 1995 RODs and two treatment
technologies at non-Superfund DoD and DOE sites, and two innovative treatment technologies selected for two RCRA corrective actions.  Other changes are listed belo^-
SITE NAME, STATE TECHNOLOGY 8TH EDITION
REGION (ROD DATE) (LISTED IN 7TH EDITION) ADDED 1 DELETED
1
i 1
i
I
1
|' 1
1
2 '•'•'
i
i
2
|--».2!i
2
New Bedford, MA
(04/06/90)
Norwood PCBs, MA
(09/29/89)
Wells G&H, MA
(09/14/89)
WellsiG&K'OUI.MA
(09/14/89)
Davis Liquid Waste, Rl
(09/29/87)
Brook Industrial Park, Oil 1,
NJ
(09/30/94)
DeRewal Chemical, NJ
(09/29/89)
tipari, Landfill, NJ r ] =
(07/11/88)
Applied Environmental
Services, OU1, NY
(06/24/91)
Incineration (on site)
Solvent extraction
Incineration (on site)
Sdil vapor extraction
Incineration (on site)
Incineration (on site)
Incineration (on site)
Incineration (on site) i "
Bioventing

Soil vapor
extraction and in
situ air sparging

!,_ - 1-' ; '.'.'.'...'
I '

Yes
Yes
Yes
! 'Yes
Yes
Yes
•^•""•"•^"•^•"•"•i^^^™"
CHANGED TO COMMENTS CONTACTS/PHONE 1
- -.--,-,—, ~r- .-,-
Incineration
(off site)
Thermal
desorption
Thermal "
desorption

Remedy canceled because of community concerns. No
alternative selected at this time.
il."1. r.f|?ii..p , .-.^-iy. ..<.«. - i!!-^ . j .|.|M. 	 ii .. -..-.
Remedy not implemented becausetof space constraints on-site,
cost, and safety issues. New cleanup goals based on future land
use and changes in risk assessment methodologies. Site will be
capped instead. ROD Amendment issued on 5/17/96.
Remedy changed to off-site incineration because of community
concerns. Explanation of significant difference (ESD) signed
04/25/91.
Adding airsparging to existing SVE proje'ctjto enhance pump-
and-treat. Conducting SVE on a new area (New England
Plastics). ESD to be issued.
Thermal desorption cheaper and more effective based on
performance data. ESD signed on 7/1 9/96.
Misinterpretation of ROD. Will conduct off-site inpineration or
disposal.
Remedy changed to off-site disposal because more cost-
effective. Much less volume of contaminated material than
originally projected.
RODspecifledthermalitreatmentofmarshsedlments! !
Thermal desorption was selected as the treatment.
Misinterpretation of ROD.
David Dickerson
617-573-9632
BobCianciarulo
617-573-5778
MaryGarren
617-573-9613
Paula Ftesimmons (MA)
617-223-5572
MaryGarren • : ! •
617-573-9613^
Neil Handler
617-543-9636
'"If :"V!1!?'1W?r*VT1>
Donna Vizian
212-637-4295 ^
Romona Pezzella
212-637-4385
FredCataneo • ''; i
212-637-4428; -;,
Maria Jon
212-637-3967
Gerald Ridder (NY)
518-457-0927
Information on the date and issuance of Explanations of Significant Differences (ESDs) and ROD Amendments is not complete.
                                                                  D-23
-------
Eighth Edition (November 1996)(continued)

REGION
2





2



2

o



3



3 ;

3


ill ,r .« „ ,,.
3

3


SITE NAME, STATE
(ROD DATE)
Ctrcuitron Corporation, OU 1,
NY
(03/29/91)



Love Canal, NY
(10/1/87)


SarneyFarm, NY
(09/27/90)
. , ^ - - -, . . v~
Delaware Sand & Gravel, DE
(04/22/88)


Southern Maryland Wood
Treating, MD
(06/29/88)
t I'"'" l!""r ' " '.•".'•
Eastern Diversified Metals, PA
(03/29/91)
MW Manufacturing, PA
(06/29/90)

., ffl- I'lf >• (If ' t. |'i F IMI il ' ''If il-l : ?,- -3
Sageiiown Industrial, PA
(01/29/93)
Whitmoyer Laboratories, OU 2,
PA
(12/17/90)
TECHNOLOGY
(LISTED IN 7TH EDITION)
Soil vapor extraction





Incineration (on site)



Incineration (on site)

Incineration (on site)



Incineration (on site)


r ,; .1 f «: i - ,, ,T| •. ,, m- • - - Tl,
Incineration (on site)

Incineration (on site)


IB-i.ir; *ff i-tf-r -,.f, •„ - , ,
Incineration (on site)

Incineration (on site)


^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^1
•••••i
ADDED



















. . _





: ri .| • • . fl Tl'fi





8THEDITIO
DELETED
Yes





- lf -












,,


Yes


- » t-i- -, .-,•





N
CHANGED TO






Incineration
(off site)


Thermal
desorption
Soil vapor
extraction and
bioremediation
(in situ)
Thermal
desorption

I = T - ,~ % i] | 't|:
Incineration
(off site)



™r, , a. j ,,», i,ri.
Incineration
(off site)
Incineration
(off site)

^•^^••^••••1
COMMENTS
Further investigation indicated that VOCs were below action
levels.




PRP was conducting on-site indneration at another site. Waste
was transported to that site for incineration. ESD issued 1 1 /96.


Misinterpretation of the ROD.

v if ( j|--| .•• ||1 ii -• "1111 fin- - i - , . - - • -
Remedy was revised to address previously unrecognized site
conditions. ROD amendment signed on 09/30/93. SVE
subsequently changed to bioventing.

Remedy changed to thermal desorption, because of cost and
community concerns. ROD issued on 09/08/95.

| - .f, , -,.=,--, - - • ,-,r >: T . -• -icrnr .i 	 i-
1 ROD specified an or off-site incineration.; Off-site being |
1 conducted because of reduced amount of material to be treated.
Pilot-scale trial burn could not achieve emission standards.
Remedy to be determined; considering solidification/ stabiliza-
tion at this time.
,m pip ^i,i,ii..r:,i ,,-, ••"-•^•fj'«:-'!y|li Jj«7j|;g ]'••; -; '.'i-r-; If- r |i
Remedy changed beca'use of cost and faster treatment time. ;
ESD signed on 03/09/95. \
Remedy changed because the volume of wastes was less than
originally projected. ESD signed on 12/28/94.

^ _
^^^^^^^H
CONTACTS/PHONE
••••^••••^••••••••^••••Hl^
Miko ftyon
212-637-4250

Thomas Simmons
(USAGE)
816-426-2296
DamianDuda ; :
212-637-4269 i
DougCarbarini i !
212-637-4263 I
Kevin Willis
212-637-4271
Eric Newman
21&56&3237 j
i
!
Stephanie Dehnhard
215-5663234

.• • 1 T :, alt, --.;
Steven Donohue <
215-566-3215 \
Bhupi Khona
215-56&3213

'.;••» ' ; a •• • - • ! •• t ; , ;
Steven Donohue '
215-566-3215 |
Chris Corbet
215-566-3220

Information on the date and issuance of Explanations of Significant Differences (ESDs) and ROD Amendments is not complete.
                                                                 D-24
-------
Eighth  Edition (November 1996) (continued)
REGION
3
I 3
|
3
fj--uir.j.ii~[1i»(
i '4
4
ifmrv
!.'. 4' ''
\
4
•""i 1 T '
I 4
I
4
pBffff'ii'f)
1: " 4 .
SITE NAME, STATE
(ROD DATE)
Rentokil,VA
(06/22/93)
,, ,,,:f| ,(1 ,..-.... ,-,-,,-,,-
Saunders Supply Co., OU 1 , VA
(09/30/91)
Ordnance Works Disposal,
WV (03/31/88)
"f ?inf!TTr::P*^r™T'ffBff'""
Ciba-Geigy (Mclntosh Plant),
OU 2, AL
(09/30/91)
Ciba-Geigy (Mclntosh Plant),
OU 2, AL
(09/30/91)
;i1f*|»PpW'ffS"iT!!.w'1" ?'''"'!* If!''" ?'
Ciba-Geigy (Mclntosh Plant),
OU 4, AL
(07/14/92)
Ciba-Geigy (Mclntosh Plant),
OU4.AL
(07/14/92)
„«,„« > "p f 'f r * if1
Mowbray Engineering, AL
(09/25/86)
American Creosote Works,
Inc., OU 2, FL
(02/03/94)
Zellwood Groundwater, FL
(12/17/87) ;
TECHNOLOGY
(LISTED IN 7TH EDITION)
Thermal desorption
"S=S1 fljIi^pr^^irfTEi^siEtiBSS^iraS'.-i'-^^irifPSf •
Dechlorination and Thermal
desorption I
Incineration (on site)
w. ^ii!|ppjmmT'^appfipff f^ip aiwiiw
Thermal desorption
Flushing (in situ)
l^rfrpjipjifwip J-!j«i|!»»'iS{ [»•» *•
thermafdesorption
Flushing (in situ)
i ^npj. p t f! > itww
Incineration (on site)
Surfactant flushing -
groundwater
sff P?iip "3^* if h'*f pfi'*ff™s'r
Incineration (on site)
ADDED

iiM^.«B»HW$r;;>paii,fijS^|
•flTPif-'jii ^W,~¥^5^i3ES 'i^RJ^
| | ^m fi *^j l^n I

: ntTnji if^f?!
8TH EDITION
DELETED
Yes
,, -. ^-^ J^pp ^JP-..^-^
Yes
fr™1 ?*!! *
Yes
.iiaiffif^.^ffiaiSSffli
:' '!• 'ffl
Yes
p»fj«rr mit^i
Yes
Yes
f-jp," ;-|j™
CHANGED TO
Incineration
(off site)
Bioremediation
(ex situ)
!T:f-:rf»?f|^l»*?!«i
Incineration •
(on site)
s"f«™l"!'lf""f«!'»!«;;:i:arr
Incineration '
(on site)
mPf "TPTT"1
Sotidffication/:
stabilization

^Solidification/ :
stabilization
COMMENTS
Groundwater modeling indicated that there would be no
further groundwater contamination if source soils were left
in place. Site will be capped. ROD amendment issued on
8/27/96.
fW»* :1H^TWr"mpT!> W'fiTW^iPWeffWff ffilf«m^»np|fiJ»l^fip^pp»*!iiKm*H«|.fiHis*'i»s*iR
Remedy changed torfsite incineration due to ;
implementability, short-term effectiveness, ;and cost. ROD
Amendment issued on 9/27/96.
Remedy changed because of community concerns. ROD
amended in 1/89.
!'?rffn?*?!?ppi^^^
Treatability study showed that incineration was more cost-
effective.
Treatabiliry study showed percolation from precipitation was
just as effective. Minimal benefit would be gained from
flushing (in situ).
.^,,re.,,»ff,^1.r ^spftfflp^i-l, ygl^M^pp , j^-j-tl . j. i^.f
Jreatability study showed that indneration'wasirnore cost-
effective. ' ! : ;
Treatability study showed percolation from precipitation was
just as effective. Minimal benefit would be gained from
flushing (in situ).
i|f,^WY»p,ra-i ^mfjHr^f^rmtpfpf^yfpp ,(>!» » -*.j
Remedy changed because of cost.
Determined that pump-and-treat alone would be effective.
.*"* pi"Ti-i; iV'W'"' :f:j* ll''; '".!!i';3!"}(*rt*' • ' I1-*1. tff|
rtemedy changed because of community concerns and because
the state would not concur with incineration. ROD amendment
issued on 03/01/90.
CONTACTS/PHONE
Andrew Palestini
215-597-1286
Pp pW;!PW(:!iil?lljB!a^lWIfllti,aiSS*"1^rFi^5f^'lffI
Andrew Palestini
215-597-1286
Melissa Whittington
215-56^3235
"ffTf »»WI«|?i'I>r?/«!"«;»««in'in^i-«'i]»l;
Charles L. King, Jr. !• i
404-562-8931 I
Charles L King, Jr.
404-562-8931
rm ^T"-'"tT' m> r ma
Charles L King] JrJ1 l! 1
404-562-8931 !
Charles L King, Jr.
404-562-8931
P,,;«ri|,rrf11f».^,,,np
TimWoolheater *
404-347-2643
MarkFite
404-562-8927
Ingp!..^! i^BSW^fHHt-tlUm'f *||l*»5Br,1«B
(i'.. -~ i Flo!, f Ti-f[F1'.nr|;il
Pam Scully -"- ; :
404^47-6246 '-. '•}
Information on the date and issuance of Explanations of Significant Differences (ESDs) and ROD Amendments is not complete.
                                                                  D-25
-------
Eighth Edition (November 1996) (continued)
REGION
4
4
4

4
4
4
4
5
5
SITE NAME, STATE
(ROD DATE)
Mathis Brothers Landfill (South
Marble Top Road), GA
(03/24/93)
Smith's Farm
Brooks, KY
(09/29/89)
Aberdeen Pesticide Dump
Fairway, NC
(06/30/89)
1 1 IT '
Cape Fear Wood Preserving,
NC
(06/30/89)
Geiger/C&M Oil, SC
(06/01/87)
Para-Chem Southern; Inc., SG
(09/27/93)
American Creosote Works
(Jackson Plant), TN
(01/05/89)
Acme Solvent Reclaming, IL
(09/27/85)
Fort Wayne Reduction, IN
(08/26/88)
TECHNOLOGY
(USTED IN 7TH EDITION)
Incineration (on site)
Incineration (on site)
Incineration (on site)
,- F. !» !] - I i - i '
Bioremediation; (ex situ) -
slurry-phase
Incineration (on site)
-.- .[• 1*1. 1 1.
Bioremediation (exisitu) -
slurry-phase
Incineration (on site)
Incineration (on site)
Incineration (on site)
ADDED










STHEOmO!
| DELETED




Yes

Yes !
Yes
	 **""

i
CHANGED TO
Incineration
(off-site) and
bioremediation
(ex-situ)
Dechlaritmfen,
thermal desorp-
tion and,
Solidification/
stabilization
Thermal
desorption
- • . ,- - f

Solidification/
stabilization
\ '- -


Incineration
(off site)
COMMENTS
Remedy changed because of community concerns, cost-
effectiveness, and decreased waste volume from original
ROD, Bioremediation will treat dicamba wastes. Incineration
(off site) will treat all other wastes.
Remedy changed because of community concerns.
Amended remedy is dechlorination and thermal desorption
followed by solidification/stabilization. ROD amendment
issued on 09/30/91.
Remedy changed because of community concerns, cost, and
a preference for using an innovative technology. ROD
amendment signed on 09/30/91.
-. -in - :••• - i-i -. ;-r.i' ; i; . ,
Original remedycalied for soil washing followed by slurry-phase
bioremediation of fines, based on an 80% reduction in volume of
contaminated soil achieved by soil washing. Soil washing
bidders claimed a 96% reduction in volume of contaminated soil,
thus making slurry-phase bioremediation too costly for the 0.4%
of contaminated fines remaining.
Further investigation found that organics were not present at
their previous levels. ROD amendment issued 07/1 3/93.
•• •:.» . • ,-:• ;- - : « |ii, --, ••: 1111- -• r. : |
Remedycanceledibecauseibfconcemsaboutfeasibility,
performance, and treatmenttime. Will excavate and dispose
off-site.
Action completed as a removal by excavating and disposing off
site. ESD issued in 1992.
PRPs excavated and disposed of soil off-site. '•
Remedy changed to ROD contingency off-site incineration
because of community concerns, cost, and implementability.
CONTACTS/PHONE
Charles L King Jr.
40^562-8931
Antonio DeAngelo
404-562-8826
Kay Crane
404-562-8795
Randy McElveen (NC)
919-733-2801
i i • i -
JonBornholm
404-562-8820
Sherry Panabaker
404-562-8810
JudyCanova
803-8964046
FemiAkindale
404-347-7791
Deborah Orr •
312-886-7576 ;
Fred Mickey
312-886-5123
Information on the date and issuance of Explanations of Significant Differences (ESDs) and ROD Amendments is not complete.
                                                                 D-26
-------
Eighth  Edition  (November 1996) (continued)
REGION
5
5
5
5
5
!' 5;'
!
5
rr-"p
5
|linn>[,nr;.«»rrt,!^|p
f " 5 ' 1
1
j
5
SITE NAME, STATE
(ROD DATE)
Ninth Avenue Dump, IN
(06/30/89)
If" !"ffj!7il"?|!TT;?r!fr[*'T'[f ' ": ~
Bofors Nobel, Ml': ; :
(09/17/90) •
Forest Waste Products, Ml
(03/31/88)
< ^r* -]f^- .Tt^i, ^.••n,'.i|il1^j.'Sj T'l ; ,;srni v:
Ott/Stdry/Cordova Chemical,
Ml
(09/27/93)
Springfield Township Dump, Ml
(09/29/90)
Thebno-Chem, Inc., OU 1,'MI
(09/30/91) :
Arrowhead Refinery Co., MN
(09/30/86)
i*'J.I| -lfl ••!((. •H.CHIflJfT. filfllTII •*:•'?>•
Ritari Post and P6le,OUl,MN
(06/30/94)
Fields Brook, OH
(09/30/86)
sEiia^|i?F55i!r'irpf1:p;si!st«jirEp \w(lf sftf&qpmn f;.|
Pristine, OH1
(12/31/87) . :
Pristine, OH
(03/30/90) (Amendment)
TECHNOLOGY
(LISTED IN 7TH EDITION)
Incineration (on site)
t "*' * |!P" •' '5 '* |T • 1 ! •[
Incineration (on site)
Incineration (on site)
i'-EI-T'-pni . .'^I^IP'B, : .|^r i]!i .I-;-' F"!" .1* ' *','^j
Thermal desorption
Incineration (on site)
't'|'[S!r]rhrfiif^-*^f!^»T«fi
Soil vapor extraction
Incineration (on site)
.lljn'.IJifsorr.^fflp VTJ ifpyzpip^ppc.fl
Incineration (on site) '" ' • ;
Incineration (on site)
«npn;aii firt^i.!!, inn; ,!« JMs^ujjsn f -.-irtiei1: if ,tt
Incineration (on site)
Incineration (on site)
ADDED


i „ -i^.^,i:-fii-,?Msi'SE;?'i'a^

Air sparging
sr^F-^7fi^,i="r^r -i:-3,s
; * i r . "iri^riiS!»iii ,f ^r-sgtigf is; f fa

8TH EDITIOt
DELETED

Yes
*Tff ^isl" . li'Js,-,1 '-i,
Yes
Yes

rs:."-,-¥ g -j.,.: ;=lp,
,'iatlS-&' •'.•Bi-l r ^B' "p!

J
CHANGED TO
Soil vapor
extraction

Incineration
(off site)
-""frii"'-! •••'••.' VT


Solvent extraction
»'PffiS!f"fi!iifiii!Frf"Wf^
1 Incineration •!! \
: (offsite) ij
Incineration
(off site)
§pf^=ia'*T'r'!.^:m rf lifflEiRin1-
!':> •• • |. ' ^
Soil vapor !
extraction
and thermal
destruction
Thermal
desorption
1
COMMENTS
Remedy changed because of cost. Soil vapor extraction will
treat larger area than soil flushing remedy that was completed
in 1994. Soil flushing removed most of the heavier contami-
nants. ROD amendment signed on 9/13/94.
Remedy changed from on-site incineration;to disposal in an on-
site landfill because of cost. Volume of material to be treated
much greaterthan expected. ROD amendment signed on 071221
92. Now proposing containment via slurry wall because of cost.
Original ROD specified either on-site or off-site incineration as
the remedy. ESD signed on 05/04/93.
 3.--SF" ^f^*':r'=
John Fagiolo 'il
312-886-0800
KashualKhanna
312-553-2663
•-• '; f- M" " 	 fjl ! "TIEIf1 1"
JimHahnenberg1 1
312-3534213
Edwin Smith
312-353-6571
•nin»p-lfmil|linir.^a^|Kiiit^i^
RamonTorres : i : f
312-88&5010 ; ;
EdHanlon
312-553-9228
T,-V|-^f-:.. — ~ig*..m^iff tpp.
TomAlcamo
312-886-7278
TomAlcamo
312-886-7278
Information on the date and issuance of Explanations of Significant Differences (ESDs) and ROD Amendments is not complete.
                                                                  D-27
-------
Eighth Edition (November 1996)(continued)
ISITE NAME. STATE TECHNOLOGY 8TH EDITION
REGION (ROD DATE) (LISTED IN 7TH EDITION) ADDED 1 DELETED) CHANGED TO COMMENTS CONTACTS/PHONE
5


i 5



1
5


i 5
;
5





I 5


6


; -'-ill i" . :
6


6


; 6


Skinner Landfill OU 2, OH
(06/04/93)

1 i
Van Dale Junkyard, OH
(09/31/94)



Zanesville Well Field, OH
(09/30/91)

Zanesville Well Field, OH
(09/30/91)
City Disposal Corporation
Landfill, Wl
(09/28/92)


: - • ; < -
Hagen Farm, Groundwater
Control OU.WI
(09/30/92)
Vertac, AR
(09/27/90)

•I |- , J, • :. .1 i; - - - , .1,
Guff Coast Vacuum Services,
OU1.LA
(09/30/92)
MOTCO, TX
(03/15/85)
r -••--» -,..,..:•.-
Petro-Chemical Systems, Inc.
OU2,TX
(09/06/91)
Soil vapor extraction


Bioremediation (in situ) -
other



Soil vapor extraction


Soil washing

Soil vapor extraction




i.i • i
Bioremediation (in situ) -
groundwater

Incineration (on site)


1 - •-• ' 1 -I'-;-'! ' - ; '
Incineration (on site)

-
Incineration (on site)

if. .r. •- ' >• i -
Air sparging










Air sparging

•














«... - -





"~ " . " r r



Yes


Yes







Yes

Yes





Yes


Yes


-. -


































„ . • !, - - .;..•.-->,.
Bioremediation
(exsitu)-
land treatment
Incineration
(off site)
• |:tr •;•!- if r
Bioremediation
(in situ)-
groundwater
Further investigation through a feasibility study indicated that
the site conditions would not be amenable to SVE, Will cap
instead.
Predesign sampling indicated that contaminant levels had
decreased. No active bioremediation is occurring. The site
will be capped and will rely on natural attenuation with
monitoring.

Implemented by PRPs to accelerate groundwater remediation.

1 •! MI.I iifit . - I - Hi - :m ,i -
Will excavate and dispose off-site because soil volume was
much smaller that originally projected.
Rise in groundwatertable prevented implementation of SVE.
Remedy changed to capping with gas collection.



• • - il - : i. - -- - , i .
Treatability studies indicated that bioenhancement would not
provide any additional benefit. Relying on natural attenuation.
Explanation of Significant Differences (ESD) signed on 08/27/96.
Incinerator would not function properly. Community preferred
landfilling and was cheaper. ROD amendment issued
9/17/96.
'IP \ " t'-: •"" :"''•-'- -..-.-;•-. ,<:- p -. .
Agreement between PRPs and EPA to meet the treatment
standards using bioremediation.

Remedy changed because of contractor problems and cost.
ESD has been issued.
-- f '.•••! i- lip 111 • - - . - :; ill if .1 I";, ',.- -1. ,J |, T~
Bioremediatfon thought to be more effective.


Jamey Bell
312-886-6436

Lawrence Schmitt \
312-353-6565 |

James Campbell !
412-351-6132 !
Dave Wilson
312-886-1476
r , .|. .i., i-,
Dave Wilson i
312-886-1476
Russ Hart
312-886-4844

MikeSchmollerfWI)
608-2753303
---.,:
Steve Padovani ;
312-353*755 :

Phillip Allen
214^65^516

•l| , • i.'T-,, ...r, ,, --, ..
KatileenAisling •
214-665-8509 . ;

Mary Ann Abramson
214-665^754
., , t!i ,, - ,,,l,- .. ..,.
ChrisVillarreal ; , i
214-665-6758 if [
-i! ;: i i
Information on the date and issuance of Explanations of Significant Differences (ESDs) and ROD Amendments is not complete.
                                                                  D-23
-------
Eighth  Edition  (November 1996) (continued)

REGION
7
7
1
7
i 7
i
7
8
8


8
i
CITF MAIM1F QTATF
(ROD DATE)
People's Natural Gas, IA
(06/16/91)
Hastings Groundwater;
Contamination (East
Industrial), NE
(09/28/90)
Sherwood Medical, NE
(09/28/93)
Valley ParkTCE Site, '
WainwrightOU.MO
(09/29/94)
Valley ParkTCE Site,
Wainwright OU, MO
(09/24/94)
Broderick'Wood Projects, CO
(06/30/88)
Lockheed/Martin
(Denver Aerospace), CO
(Remedial Action)
(09/24/90)


ildahoPb!e:Cdmpahy,MT
(09/28/92)
TFrHMfii nnv
(LISTED IN 7TH EDITION)
Bioremediation (in situ) -
other
Incineration (on site)
Thermal desorption
In situ air stripping
Thermal desorption
''""W"*™'*™1'' 	 '"""^Jf'f^j'r^ff-f
Incineration (on site) [
Soil vapor extraction and
thermal desorption


Flushing! (in situji . :
-^—-
ADDED
Air sparging
• - -i








8TH EDITION
DELETED



Yei?'1

Yes
Listing
as a
Superfund
remedial
action has
been
deleted.
•IffPI;'
•••
CHANGED TO

Incineration
(off site)
Soil vapor
extraction (ex situ)
,; :.
Soil vapor
extraction
(ex situ)
incineration
(offsite)



r^lT-TTPT
Bioremediation
(ex situ) -
land treatment
|^H^^HH^H|H^^H|H
COMMENTS

Remedy changed because volume of soil was less than
originally projected. More cost-effective to incinerate off-site.
ROD amendment issued 02/28/95.
Soil vapor extraction (ex situ) will be more cost-effective. ESD
issued 09/05/95.
ji|te n ll^|p TBTl: - '^»-B«I! .Waa!W1«!*^
Air sparging would be 'difficult to imple'rnenf and hearty
residences might be adversely affected. Will do pump-and-treat
instead. ESD issued on 04/02/96.
Soil vapor extraction (ex situ) more cost-effective. ESD issued
on 04/02/96.
Remedy [canceled based on new technicaWata and cost. Will
excavate and recycle and incinerate off-site. ROD amendment
signed on 09/24/91.
Remedial action being handled as a RCRA corrective action.


Furthennvestigation Indicated flushing (in situ); would not? be
effective. Soils were excavated and will be treated as part of
the land treatment remedy. ESD issued on 05/21/96.
^•••B"
CONTACTS/PHONE 1
Diana Engeman
913-551-7797
RonKing ;
913-551-7063
Steve Auchterlonie
913-551-7778
Steve Auchterlonie '".'
913-551-7778
DaveMosby(MO)
573-751-1288
Steve Auchterlonie
913-551-7778
DaveMosby(MO)
573-751-1288
Armando Saenz ! '];
303-312-6559
George Dancik
303-312-6935
Charles Johnson (CO)
303-692-3348


Jim Harris , -; 1 1
406441-1150 • ' j
Information on the date and issuance of Explanations of Significant Differences (ESDs) and ROD Amendments is not complete.
                                                                  D-29
-------
Eighth Edition (November  1996) (continued)

REGION
8




9



9


i 9

i
9





! 9



i
9





; 9

r
_
SITE NAME, STATE
(ROD DATE)
Summit* Mine, OU 1, CO
(12/15/94)



Motorola 52nd Street, AZ
(09/30/88)


Seal Beach Navy Weapons
Station, IR Site 1 4, CA
(DoD Action)
Hexcel, CA
(09/21/93)

Intel Mountain View (355
Middlefield Road), CA
(06/09/89)


n ' i- -..- i i . •
Koppers Company, Inc.
(Oroville Plant), CA
(09/13/89)


Koppers Company, Inc.
(Oroville Plant), CA
(09/13/89)



Middlefield-Ellis-Whisman
(MEW) -Siemins/Sobrato (455
& 487 Middlefield Road), CA
(06/30/93)
TECHNOLOGY
(LISTED IN 7TH EDITION)
This is a FY 1995 ROD and
was not listed in the seventh
edition. The FY 1995 ROD
specified bioremediation
(in situ)
i
Soil vapor extraction



Soil vapor extraction


Air sparging, bioremediation
(in situ) - groundwater, soil
vapor extraction
Soil vapor extraction




] .:•; » . •
Soil washing




Bioremediation
(in situ) - other



_..!-,',
Soil vapor extraction



MM
ADDED





Air sparging














•-•> •











Air sparging



STHEDITIOt
DELETED
\fes








Yes


Yes


Yes




. ^
Yes




Yes









J
1 CHANGED TO































..<




••••^•••••••1
COMMENTS
^^^••^^^••••^^^^^••^•"••••••••••^^^^^^••••^^^••^^^^^^^•^•••••^•i
When heap leach pad rinsed with water, cyanide concentra-
tions were reduced and bioremediation was not necessary.
ESD issued on 6/4/97.






Research project, not afull-scale cleanup.


Hexcel was removed from the National Priorities List (NPL) oh
November 1,1 993.

Groundwater table rose, leaving too little unsaturated soil to
warrant SVE. Soils were excavated and aerated.



',.!•• i :i,'-i • • ' - ' I -',; ill. : I - , -
Further analysis determined soil washing would be ineffective,
more dioxins discovered and land use scenario changed. Soil will
be disposed of in a landfill with the potential for two percent of the
most contaminated soil treated through solidification/stabilization.
ROD amendment issued on 8/29/96.
Presence of metals and dioxins made bioremediation infeasible,
and land use scenario changed. Soil will be disposed of in a
landfill with the potential for two percent of the most contami-
nated soil treated by solidification/stabilization. ROD amend-
ment issued on 8/29/96.
. -.r r : - ; j - - .- . . j


:' ' M "' : i ' '
: : ' ! ! ! '-'"'.

CONTACTS/PHONE
James Hanley
303-312-6725

Victor Ketellepepper
303-312-6578
FredSchauffler
415-744-2359 ;
ManaFont i
602-207-4194 I
Ken Reynolds
619-532-2912

Mark Johnson
510-286-0305 :

Elizabeth Adams
415-744-2235

Michael Maley
510450-6159

FredSchauffler
415-744-2359



Fred Schauffler
415-744-2359



-
Elizabeth Adams
415-744-2235


Information on the date and issuance of Explanations of Significant Differences (ESDs) and ROD Amendments is not complete.
                                                                  D-30
-------
Eighth  Edition (November 1996) (continued)
CITF MAIUIF STATF TFrHNOI OGY 8TH EDITION
REGION (ROD DATE) (LISTED IN 7TH EDITION) ADDED 1 DELETED CHANGED TO
^^^^^^•••^H
9



1 10
i
i

i
10



10'


!
I
^^^^••^^^^^^^••^^^^^^^^•••^^^^B
Van Waters and Rogers, CA
(09/30/91)



Eie1sonAFB,OUs3,4,and5,
AK
(9/22/95)


Idaho National Engineering
Laboratory, Pit 9 (OU7-10), ID
(09/23/93)
-
USDOEHahford 100 Area,
OUs100-BC-1,100-DR-1,100-
HR-1.WA
(9/27/95)


Soil vapor extraction



"jpfffTf'f -'•|1|'!«'«f 'IH1 : "" '• *
This is iaFY 1995 ROD and
was not listed in the seventh
edition. The FY 1995 ROD
specified bioventing and soil
vapor extraction.
Solvent extraction


„ , ,_ir ;.^.^^^.r,_-
TnisisaFYSs'Robthat
was not listed in the seventh
edition. The FY95 ROD
specified thermal desorption
for soil contaminated with
organic compounds








Vitrification


.,„. ,r^,!srsii.g . ., ,^,. 4





Yes



Yes






-asK-iB, 1-11*3. 4 f,,;!r '
i-'^!








, V":-j" ,, .-






i >- r— -=_, - f re^ V ?E¥pi •»•) ft "if





••••^••••••••^••i
COMMENTS
Site was proposed for listing on the NPL but has been
removed. Responsibility was picked up under RCRA and
subsequently dropped from RCRA authority.


Remedy changed to institutional controlsiecauseithere was
not enough contamination present to warrant active
remediation. Groundwater also was contained, preventing risk
duetogroundwater.

Misinterpretation of the ROD.


sfflit«m;w^Wff*wi|i!f>-^^M^WW a- .^'ffi^rc.
RemVdyl'changed to on-site dispbsal because further
investigation did not indicate that organics were present.




CONTACTS/PHONE
Belinda Wei
415-744-2280

Duazo Ricco
510-268-0837
Mary Jane Nearman '
206-553-6642 '



Mary Jane Nearman
206-553-6642

" • , [ ^fi- -fr
Doug Sherwood
509-376-9529 u
I

Audrey Dove ::
509-376-6865 < :

Information on the date and issuance of Explanations of Significant Differences (ESDs) and ROD Amendments is not complete.
                                                                  D-31
-------
 Seventh Edition (September 1995): Additions, Changes, and Deletions from the Sixth Edition (September 1994)
The seventh edition of this report added information about 42 innovative treatment technologies selected for remedial action under FY 1994 RODs and eight innovative
treatment technologies selected for seven RCRA corrective actions.

1 REGION
1
i
i 2
!
2

i 2
2
j'i ;; r •>.
( 3
\-
3
[ 4
5
SITE NAME, STATE
(ROD DATE)
Linemaster Switch Corpora-
tion, CT
(07/21/93)
!
AmertcanThermostat, NY
(06/29/90)
GCL Tie and Treating, NY
(Removal Action)

General Motors Central
Foundry Division (OU 1 and
OU2),NY
(12/17/90) & (03/31/92)
Pasley Solvents and
Chemicals, Inc., NY
(04/24/92)
1 1 I '- 1- (1 i : | ' '
Bendfy PA
(09/30/88)
Brown's Battery Breaking Site,
OU2.PA
(07/02/92)
Helena Chemical, SC
(09/08/93)
Carter Industries, Ml
(09/18/91)
TECHNOLOGY
(LISTED IN 6TH EDITION)
Soil vapor extraction
Thermal desorption
Bioremediation (ex situ) -
Composting

Bioremediation (ex situ) -
slurry-phase
Flushing (in situ) and soil
vapor extraction
Soil vapor extraction
i
Fuming gasification
Bioremediation (ex situ)
and dechlorination
Thermal desorption
7
ADDED

Thermal
desorption
(phase 2)



Air sparging




TH EDITION
DELETED








Yes
Yes

CHANGED TO
Dual-phase
extraction

Thermal
desorption (being
implemented as a
remedial action
with the ROD
signed 09/30/94)
Thermal
desorplion
Soil vapor
extraction and
air sparging
f
Mechanical
aeration
Plasma high-
temperature
metals recovery
Incineration
(off site)

IHHBHHHHH^Bi
I COMMENTS
Groundwater also is being treated with this technology.
Project is being conducted in two phases. Phase 1 has been
completed and is listed as a separate project.
Site is not amenable to composting because of the presence
of long-chain PAHs and the time constraints of the removal
process. A treatability study achieved over 90% reduction but
little degradation of long chain carcinogenic hydrocarbons
occurred.

! i • | r . . -1
Both OUs were combined under the thermal desorplion !
remedy. ROD amended to combine both OUs under a :
thermal desorption remedy. ;
SVE, in combination with air sparging, will eliminate the need
for soil flushing. ROD amendment was signed 05/22/95.
, . , . ,r ,.. ,,., }. ........
It was determined that SVE was not a viable remedy; soil was
too tightly compacted. No alternative has been selected. ESD
issued on 11/22/95.
The name of the technology was changed to reflect the
treatment process more accurately.
•• - i •••• , .,
Technologies could not meet cleanup goal. i
Thermal desorption was too costly (approximately $300 per cu
yd). It is less expensive to dispose of the wastes atTSCA
landfill (approximately $186 per Ton).
Wmnmimm
CONTACTS/PHONE
Elise Jakabhazy
617-573-5760
ChristoTsiamis
212-637-4257
Joe Cosentino
908-906-6983

Lisa Jackson
212-637-4274
Sherrel Henry
212-637-4273
Jim Harper
215-597-6906
Richard Watman
215-566-3219
Bernie Hayes
404-562-8822
Jon Peterson
312-353-1264
Information on the date and issuance of Explanations of Significant Differences (ESDs) and ROD Amendments is not complete.

                                                               D-32
-------
Seventh  Edition (September 1995)  (Continued)
^mm
REGION
5
5
5
fVT '«trai
! 5
5
¥ :M«1| ','? :6 '•
8
•.i H!fllfflrf i-eh6ii!.i:ii.!i].
; r M
I 8
CITE MAMC CTflTP
(ROD DATE)
Cliffs/Dow Dump, Ml
(09/27/89)
Electro-Voice, OU1, Ml
(06/23/92)
Ionia City Landfill, Ml
(09/29/89)
Seymour Recycling, "IN
(09/30/86)
Verona Well Field OU 2, Ml
(06/28/91)
.•Ij.ait.-i^™. •>;!••. -11 J^JITTI |'« H;«(JM:I i.
Wayne Reclamation and
Recycling, IN
(03/30/90)
Koppers/Texarkana, TX
(09/23/88)
:.|j IMtlflfpJffl' F«{lp"«llf»!tf:' "»" ' •'l*»lYp''
Koppers/Texarkana, TX
(09/23/88)
Chemical Sales Company (OU
1), CO (06/27/91)
yji^saT^nuT^K-iOTsijnnt ! ' M'^ 'iT'"^1
Mouat Industries, MT <• :
(Removal Action) ;
TFPHNOI OGY
(LISTED IN 6TH EDITION)
Bioremediation (ex situ)
-'•-"- TTT •"' •!-"'"'" Ir';rf " "
Soil vapor extraction
Vitrification
(in situ)
Bioremediation (in situ
groundwater)
Soil vapor extraction
T> V^TI''!'' f^f '^r; **p'!M*'' • '"p"
Soil vapor extraction '
Soil washing
{Jffl 	 f|f'iMp-i«:-|'^--'T', r
Flilshing (in situ) ;
Soil vapor extraction
< fTf '!|TI«f IM- 1,« n? r»i nj.f f IK*!--***"
Chemical treatment
7
ADDED

Air sparging


Soil vapor
extraction
Air sparging
;.-.-,: -r.-, - •
Air sparging
-. j ;, -r-\- i - -••-.; -Hil-lirsiii
I'M EDITION
DELETED I
Yes

Yes
Yes
K, , - -
Yes
Yes

Yes
_._-
CHANGED JO




,.1«.,-^-:,. .,-^..
Tr,_T. -,.r-,.,.

; iHinrpiSH-.^iTTiii^ •;1=3!?i-ir
•"••••••••^•^
COMMENTS
Remedy could not reduce concentrations of benzo(a)pyrene
to acceptable level. Contaminated soil was excavated and
placed in a permitted landfill.
Technology actually is a Combination of SVE ^and air sparging
called the Subsurface Volatilization and Ventilation System™.
Remedy was canceled. Conditions at the site had changed
since 1 989. Project was implemented as a time critical
removal action.
Bioremediation of groundwater was not actively pursued.
Contamination degraded through natural attenuation.
Conducting soil vapor extraction at two separate sites under
this ROD: Annex area and Paint shop area. Projects are listed
as separate entries in the ASR seventh edition.
.i;!; T«trK-***tr; ;>«»» p-".-piuF:-ni|«-;i|««i iii/j. «i ^|.fl wi|(i..»jf ijiiirf-ityj-. ••••
Air sparging was added undefihe existing ROQtoltreat
groundwater. :
Volume of soil was not as large as originally had been
projected. The small volume did not warrant bringing a soil
washing unit on-site. Will excavate and dispose of soil off-
site.
T»n if i r-i «?r Ti'i 'f'"" •:>• "«« • ft ' ] - ' |« if " '™- 	 m-T. '•*>'>' '"SffP" r|l!'F ' f! "rJ" "'
Flushing (in'situ) was never intended as a treatment at the
site. Misinterpretation of the ROD during ROD analysis.
Air sparging was added under the existing ROD to treat
groundwater.
Reducing chromium VI to chromium III not considered
innovative.
•^"•1
CONTACTS/PHONE
Ken Glatz
312-886-1434
Eugenia Chow i
312-353-3156 i
i
Michael Gifford
312-886-7257
.'V-'I'-i IP !•- > jF'r; irS.;:,;^ 'irarwr^'f «|
[•; . . : . I j • i : ! ir 'i
Jeff Gore > i
312-886-6552
Janice Bartlett
312-886-5438
-„,,,,,», j y, r^ .-.-••p-Tti;
DuaneHeaton ! J ;
312-886-6399 j
Ursula Lennox
214-665-6743
ipi|'"l!7psis"ri ifei.B'J : -r;-;si:!i';¥rrini--i^^r;.;
Ursula Lennox . " ]
214-665-6743 !
Armando Saenz
303-312-6559
Ron Bbrtran ! [
406-449-5720 '\
 Information on the date and issuance of Explanations of Significant Differences (ESDs) and ROD Amendments is not complete.
                                                                 D-33
-------
 Seventh Edition (September 1995) (Continued)
I SITE NAME, STATE TECHNOLOGY 7TH EDITION I
REGION (ROD DATE) (LISTED IN 6TH EDITION) ADDED | DELETED | CHANGED TO COMMENTS CONTACTS/PHONE
9







9

!
9


] "
' 9
I
9



•!--,:
10




10


Phoenk-Goodyear Airport
Area (North and South
Facilities), AZ
(09/26/89)




Fairchild Semiconductor, CA
(06/30/89)

Indian Bend Wash, AZ
(09/27/93)

.::
Intersil, CA
(09/27/90)
Solvent Service, CA
(09/27/93)


*••:• iij : f ii :K--ij'--j--- -,.,,- -.
Fairchild AFB Priority 1 OUS
(OU1)! Craig Rd Landfill, WA
(02/13/93)



Gould, Inc., OR (03/31/88)


Soil vapor extraction






- Ml
Two listings for soil vapor
extraction

Soil vapor extraction


- i • i :
Soil vapor extraction

Soil vapor extraction



!,••"••;•! •;!.-• ; ' •
Soil vapor extraction




Soil washing


Soil vapor
extraction






Three more soil
vapor extraction
projects
Four distinct
areas using soil
vapor extraction
!" .' ' !






!1 - P: - ' ~

|



























V, . =;- 1 •
Yes :
:



Yes
















, - T _...,. B


Soil vapor
extraction under
RCRA corrective
action
l i. Till' . 'I: |-tf (,;«' H-

i . :






Site is divided into 2 areas: North area & South area. Each
area is feted as an individual project in the seventh edition
ASR.




: ;, .]-••••--, - j • , -j p - -
Soil vapor extraction systems are being implemented at 5;
different areas at the site.

SVE is being conducted at four distinct areas;
areas 6, 7, 8, and 12, at the site. Each site is considered as an
individual project.
:,;: (I -- '" ifu-i ,- •;':•!., in i ,-|-r--rn- i), i i! ,i T|,
Site renamed to Intersil/Siemens (Intersil) ;

Project was changed from a Superfund remedial action to a
RCRA corrective action.


f 1 '".I. -- 1 ' >in 1 N-:-1 1.- T! • 11 i 1. • r- r,.| - , 1 |--.,r, - , .- „,-.
Remedy was not implemented because! of thejfdllowing j
concerns: . [ ; M :" !
•Generation of combustiblb gases Mi ! 1
•Heterogeneous stratigraph ' j i
•Reluctance to put holes into the landfill; which could lead to
leaching of contaminants
Will cap the landfill and conduct pump-and-treat operations.
Remedy was shown to be ineffective due to varying site
conditions and problems with the technology.
•^^^^••i^M^^HI^^^^^M
Craig Cooper
415-744-2370

Rusty Harris-Bishop
415-744-2365
Nancy Moore (AZ)
602-207-4180
•i I j - • r • | i | i
Elizabeth Adams ! j
415-744-2235 !
:
Emily Roth
415-744-2247

|- • ' : IT ! - - ' !
Belinda Wei !
415-744-2280
Tony Mancini
510-286-0825


rmr,
iCami Grandinetti I
;206-553-8696




Chip Humphries
503-326-2678

Information on the date and issuance of Explanations of Significant Differences (ESDs) and ROD Amendments is not complete.
                                                                D-34
-------
Seventh Edition (September 1995) (Continued)
Mi
REGION
10

10
10
; 10
SITE NAME, STATE
(ROD DATE)
Naval Submarine Base,
BangorSiteA,OU1,WA
(12/10/91)

Union Pacific Railroad Sludge
Pit, ID
(09/10/91)
Fort Lewis Military Res.
Landfill 4 and Solvent Refined
Coal Plant, WA
(09/24/93)
y- •»-,. 1 ' < |: . . .• «!.* P;.|' |l •
Eielson Air Force Base, AK |.
(9/29/92) :
TECHNOLOGY
(LISTED IN 6TH EDITION)
Soil washing

Flushing (in situ)
Soil washing
Bforemediaiton (in situ)-
bioventing and soil vapor
extraction
7
ADDED




," : i , '•
TH EDITION
DELETED


Yes

Soil vapor
extraction
••I
CHANGED TO
Flushing (in situ)

i •" : : : ':
Thermal
desorption
':
•••••^•^H
COMMENTS
Will excavate and place soil in a lined pit. Soil will be sprayed
with water and leachate and will be collected and treated.

Renriedy'was not implemented. Excavation of sllidge did not
indicate that contaminants were present. Amended ROD was
signed 9/94. Will excavate and treat off-site, in addition to a
pump-and-treat operation.
ROD specified soil washing or thermal desorption as the
remedy. Thermal desorption was selected based on the
results of a treatability study.
Soilivapor extraction written jntb ROD as a contingency.
^^^m
CONTACTS/PHONE
Harry Craig
503-326-3689
Craig Thompson (WA)
360-407-7234
Chris Drury (Navy)
206-396-0062
,.f,,| 1,:: !»«-': .Hi-fi"]!,- ::;v
Anni Williamson :
206-553-2739
Clyde Cody (ID)
208-334-0556
Bob Kievit
206-753-9014
Mary Jane Nearman
206-553-6642
RielleMarkey(AK)
907-451-2117
Information on the date and issuance of Explanations of Significant Differences (ESDs) and ROD Amendments is not complete.
                                                                 D-35
-------
Sixth Edition (September 1994):  Additions, Changes, and Deletions from the Fifth Edition (September 1993)
The sixth edidon of this report added information about 53 innovative treatment technologies seleaed for remedy action under FY 1993 RODs. Other changes are
listed below.
REGION
1

1
i
2
; 2
i
2
! 3
3
SITE NAME, STATE
(ROD DATE)
Union Chemical Co., OU1,
ME (12/27/90)

Tibbetts Road, NH
(09/29/92)

Ewan Property, OU 2, NJ
(09/29/88)
Naval Air Engineering Center,
OU 7, Interim Action, NJ
(03/16/92)

Solvent Savers, NY
(09/28/90)
U.S. Titanium, VA
(11/21/89)
LA. Clarke & Sons, OU1
(Soils), VA
(03/31/88)
TECHNOLOGY
(LISTED IN 5TH EDITION)
Thermal desorption
(In situ)

Rushing (in situ)

Soil washing and solvent
extraction
Rushing (in situ)

Soil vapor extraction
Flushing (in situ)
Bioremediation
(in situ)
e
ADDED










TH EDITION
1 DELETED


Yes

Yes
Yes

Yes

Yes
CHANGED TO
Soil vapor
extraction







Neutralization
with lime
(ex situ)

COMMENTS
It was determined that SVE would be the more cost-effective
of the two. ESD was signed April 1994.

Misinterpretation of ROD during ROD analysis. Soil was not
targeted for treatment.

Reevaluation of site found significantly less contaminated soil
than originally had been estimated. Soil will be disposed of
off-site. ESD was signed July 1 994.
- 1 • - .IfliMl! IP : 1 '-. •' . . ,
Misinterpretation ofithe ROD during ROD analysis.
',
Soil vapor extraction is a secondary remedy that may be used
instead of thermal desorption, the primary remedy, if
treatability studies show it to be effective.
- " !" '! T ":r f- """ ' " "-••"*:!•: '
Treatability studies indicated that the technology was not
feasible.: ESD is under preparation.
Facility is no longer in operation, and excavation can be done.
Remedies being considered include thermal desorption.
CONTACTS/PHONE
Terry Connelly
617-573-9638
Christopher Rushton
(MEDEP)
207-287-2651
Darryl Luce ;
617-573-5767 : ;
Mike Robinette (NH) j
603-271-2014
Kim O'Connell
212-637-4399
JeffGratz • !
212-637-4320 i ;
i i
Robert Wing j
212-264-8670 j
Lisa Wong
212-637-4267
= ' L-- :
VanceJEvans ; i
215-597-8485 \
Jeff Howard (VA) ;
804-762-4203
Andy Palestini
215-597-1286
Information on the date and issuance of Explanations of Significant Differences (ESDs) and ROD Amendments is not complete.
                                                             D-36
-------
Sixth Edition  (September 1994) (continued)
SITE NAME, STATE TECHNOLOGY
REGION (ROD DATE) (LISTED IN 5TH EDITION)
^^••i^^^^H
3


i 3


3


,«,«,• ,,,-«v»
!' '4
;
!
4


^ ,„ ,



4


4
!'

5


•J: 5


i •• '
•i^^^^^^*^^^^^^^^"""^^^^^^™^^™
LA. Clarke & Sons, OU1
(Soils), VA
(03/31/88)
liA. Clarke & Sons,
Lagoon Sludge OU, VA
(03/31/88)
Henderson Road, PA
(06/30/88)

,W'-M •: "i-pv, WWS :.r» «.,•*.*.
Cabot-Carbon/koppers
(Groundwater), iFL
(09/27/90)
Benfield Industries, NC
(07/31/92)

Charles Macon Lagoon,
Lagoon #10, NC
(09/31/91)


Palmetto Wood Preserving,
Cf"* /fiQ/Qfi/Q"7\
ou (uy/ou/o/j
. ; ' ;... i . ,• 1 [i \- ; - >,-> 1, : !i -
Arlington Blending & :,;
Packaging Co., OU1,]TN
(06/28/91)
South Andover Salvage Yard,
OU 2, MN
(12/24/91)

•, :T Fit IfT ' rTTTT'T Ti'f *
Allied Chem & Ironton Coke,
OU2.0H
(12/28/90) :

Flushing (in situ)


Biorehiediation
(ex situ)

Soil vapor extraction


„_„ „,. „,., i)tw=i ^ ,_,„,« irfK
Bioremediatibn'(in situ) - [
groundwater

Soil washing and
bioremediation (ex situ)
(slurry-phase)
Bioremediatfon -:' -'
(exsitu) :



Chemical treatment


Dechlorination : '


Bioremediation
(exsitu)


Bioremediation
(in situ)


6TH EDITION
ADDED 1 DELETED CHANGED TO









(j^f.u.i.if i r»w






w^f,^rr.






"lp^!l|*-**l"™*'rl"'1^





Bioremediation
(ex situ) (magnet!
cally enhanced
land farming)
Yes





Yes


f,,fffKvfi>-
Yes





•' Yes



Yes


Yes "


Yes


„„„„ §| ,






Reuse off-site as
fuel




.,ai.M'|lT.,,^«:i«-a::V»



Bioremediation
(ex situ) -
land treatment
rq|rrr^;T






,,,^,,M,f,«p!:,,r,,,


Thermal treatment



;••'•;'• i • 1'

' K;;:!T/ ' ' h
COMMENTS CONTACTS/PHONE |
Facility is no longer in operation, and remedies being
considered include thermal desorption.

Technology changedibecause of uncertainty:aboutihe ability
of bioremediation to reach treatment goals. ESD was signed
on 3/94.
Conducted air injection only to facilitate pump-and-treat
system. Vapors were not extracted. Further investigation
revealed that the vadose zone was not an area of concern.
rirwfpp w'«»'i!i»-"»BM««f|pfrfB!iaiifi^ii?r1!i?f f^»r!f|Tp™«f>"*f""3
Groundwater is not'beingfreated; only soiljis being treated.


Land treatment was determined to be a more cost-effective
technology.

WiBi^ffiirii^u^wirfi'^a^pi^^
Treatability study indicated tiatthe technology co'uld-riotitrea't
the contaminants of concern because of materials problems.
Will excavate and dispose of wastes off-site. ROD amend-
ment was signed in 3/94.

Waste will be disposed of more cost-effectively off-site.


Another disposal; method is likely to be used.


Technology changed to off-site thermal treatment (either
thermal desorption or incineration) because of reduced
volume of contamination found during RD investigations.
ROD amendment was signed 5/31/94.
ifll'.p!;i;I^™*lp^Fl!WlW^'|SM»^
Adding technology to treatimore highly contaminated soil.
ROD Amendment issued on 9/4/97.


Andy Palestini
215-597-1286
-f-Wl
Andy Palestini \
215-597-1286

Joe McDowell
215-566-3192

f *f "f 'fTf* ""^'""rTTIW!!
Patsy Goldberg ! i
404-562-8543

Jon Bornholm
404-562-8820

Geizelle Berinett i-\'\
404-562-8824 :

David Lown (NC)
919-733-2801
Al Cherry
404-342-7791

Derek Malory r Fl
404-562-8800 :

Bruce Sypniewski
312-886-6189

fP.,,Wf.,,M,1,,
Tom;Alcamo -.i'; I
312-886-7278, '


 Information on the date and issuance of Explanations of Significant Differences (ESDs) and ROD Amendments is not complete.
                                                                  D-37
-------
 Sixth Edition (September  1994) (continued)
I SITE NAME, STATE TECHNOLOGY 6TH EDITION
REGION (ROD DATE) (LISTED IN 5TH EDITION) ADDED | DELETED] CHANGED TO
5
i 5
!
5
6
6
6
6
6

8
i 8
i
Allied Chem & Ironton Coke,
OU2.0H
(12/28/90)
United Scrap Lead/SIA, OH
(09/30/88)

MacGillis and Gibbs Co./Bell
Lumber and Pole Co., MN
(12/31/92)
Fruitland Drum, NM
(09/08/90)
Holloman AFB, Main POL
Area, NM
Holloman AFB, Main POL
Area,NM
South Valley, NM
(09/30/88)
Tinker AFB (Soldier Creek
Bldg.3001),OK
(08/16/90)

Rocky Mountain Arsenal, M-1
Basins (OU 16), CO
(02/26/90)
Portland Cement Co. (Kiln Dust
No.2andNo.3)OU2,UT
(03/31/92)
Bioremediation
(in situ)
Soil washing

Soil washing and
bioremediation(exsitu)
of fines
Dechlorination
Bioremediation (in situ) -
groundwater
Air sparging
Soil vapor extraction
Soil vapor extraction

In situ
vitrification
Chemical treatment












Yes
Yes

Yes

Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes

Yes
Yes



Incineration
(on site)
Incineration
(off site)







:i^HBHIiBHBHBHi^HHBHi
COMMENTS CONTACTS/PHONE
Adding technology to treat more highly contaminated soil.
ROD Amendment issued on 9/4/97.
Determined to be too expensive. Soil disposed off-site if lead
levels above 1 ,550 ppm; containment of soil below this level.
ROD amendment issued on 6/27/97.

Incineration was contingency remedy in ROD. State had
concerns about effective means of soil washing, and cost of
incineration has decreased. ESD will be signed in fall 1994.
Dechlorination is not being pursued because of cost
considerations.
Groundwater remediation is not planned for this area.
Groundwater remediation is not planned for this area.
Determined there was insignificant concentration to warrant
remediation. No further action.
1 • : • - |= '.I'--. • . ,-
Determined that SVE was not viable. No alternative has been
selected.

Remedy has been canceled because of problems with the
contractor. New ROD is being negotiated.
: 1 : •
Technology is not considered innovative.
Tom Alcamo
312-886-7278
Anita Boseman
312-886-6941
Timothy Hull (OH)
513-285-6357
Daryl Owens
312-886-7089
Gregory Fife
214-655-6773
Ron Stirling
(USAGE)
402-221-7664
Ron Stirling (USAGE)
402-221-7664
BertGorrod
214-655-6779
Susan Webster
214-655-6784
Major Richard
Ashworth (USAF)
405-734-3058
Connally Mears
303-293-1528
Mike McCeney I
303-293-1526 i
Information on the date and issuance of Explanations of Significant Differences (ESDs) and ROD Amendments is not complete,
                                                                 D-38
-------
Sixth Edition  (September 1994) (continued)
QITF MAWIF QTATF TFPHNOI OGY 6TH EDITION I
Ol 1 1 NAME, OlMI C 1 t-VrmMULUvl I 	 	 1
REGION (ROD DATE) (LISTED IN 5TH EDITION) ADDED | DELETED | CHANGED TO COMMENTS CONTACTS/PHONE |
^^^^^^^^^••i
9




j ••-•-,
I 9

!

9




^;l -;-~H':T- 1 •• ''-
9




9




I- ::r"
FMC (Fresno), CA :
(06/28/91) :



Signetics (Advanced Micro
Devices 901), CA
(09/11/91)


| „ ,:ftjf.TOa;«irr-TTje.^i,--|W.-i- ••!•.*
Sacramentowmy Depot,
Oxidation Lagoons, OU 4, CA
(09/30/92)
McChord AFB Washrack
Treatment Area, AK
(09/28/92)
Soil vapor extraction




- • rr-innri: i "T : ~™ ? Tr-y- T) - i--- :•-•- -
Bioremediation (in situ) -
groundwater


Soil vapor extraction




Soil washing




Soil vapor extraction




•°- '•: 1|-j: ilS-^FS $ ;i = '|i- » ^$F r -^- .; - - T -
Soil washing ,


Bioremediation
(ex situ)

































Yes





Yes



Yes




Yes




Yes




-,, ,-,- I •:,-
Yes


Yes








Pump and treat
with air stripping

















'•'"• '"" '' -'"= ~ "J'"'A ''






Site has been removed from National Priorities List (NPL),
referred to the state



ir.T •Sinr-,ii,pr i.'i^ 11 .TH in. K * , "-T »-¥.¥: - -; c 7 :.;i:F ^'- ,"':f 1; -^ "f?f •• -'"^
Bench-scale test indicated that the technology did not work.
No ESD or ROD amendment is being issued.


ROD was misinterpreted. SVE was intended only for Spectra
Physics, the adjacent site.



Soil washing did not work because the soil contained too
many fines. Thermal desorption and solidification and
stabilization are being considered as possible remedies.


Site is subject to a combined ROD for Signetics, AMD 901/
902 and TRW Microwave site. SVE is not being done at the
TRWOU. ROD was misinterpreted.


• i ,1 . ~,t •;•-: -p LI; ,,^.-"_!i|p .ig-rr^ii)1" ii nipT-a.iF i li ; ".--|- (!'• fRi-. 'r 'F'i '-'V 'iTfi • r '\ -' "
I •: i J ' • ' •"! •'••: ; ;':!'• | ['! ;|i'. ! ' ' '' ! •.'•''•', i
Technology canceled because of cost; solidification is being
considered as an alternative.

Additional studies showed that treatment is not needed.


Maurice Chait
602-962-2187

Richard Oln
602-207-4176
-t.n-iiiv. .TJ.*-'-,-'--- • -. "; ••.«
David Roberts ;
415-744-1487 i
Brad Hicks (USAF)
209-726-4841 |
Sean Hogan
415-744-2233

Carla Dube
510-286-1041
Tom Dunkelman
415-744-2296 \

MikePfister(CA) ;
209-297-3934 ]
Damn Swartz-Larson
415-744-2233

Kevin Graves (CA)
510-286-0435
-- -j- ,-,. .' iplT! '»f .--'lf(]»f-T:pv, ;
Marlin Mezquita |
415-744-2393 ;
i
Marie Jennings
206-553-1173

 Information on the date and issuance of Explanations of Significant Differences (ESDs) and ROD Amendments is not complete.
                                                                  D-39
-------
 Fifth  Edition (September 1993):  Additions, Changes, and Deletions from the Fourth Edition (October 1992)
The fifth edition of this report added information about 49 innovative treatment technologies selected for remedial action under FY 1992 RODs and 15 innovative
treatment technologies used in removal actions. Other changes are listed below.
REGION
1
1
2
2
2
2
3
;,,! - I 'iii, |J7-
4
4
SITE NAME, STATE
{ROD DATE)
Re-Solve, MA
(09/24/87)
Pinette's Salvage Yard, ME
(05/30/89)
Naval Air Engineering Center,
OU1.NJ
(02/04/91)
:•• „!-.,,: ,i , . -f|
Naval Air Engineering Center,
OU2.NJ
(02/04/91)
Naval Air Engineering Center,
OU4.NJ
(09/30/91)
in. -fl.:] .» -f'.Ii-iri! j .Jtvr - lt'l>m -
Caldwell Trucking, NJ !
(09/25/86) : !
t . *
-••• ; i. I '
Tobyhanna Army Depot, PA
(Non-Superfund project)
r '."-' "»!'•• - '•> ;l '"' f" "•-•'
Smith's Farm Brooks, KY
(09/30/91)
American Creosote Works, FL
(09/28/89)
TECHNOLOGY
{LISTED IN 4TH EDITION)
Dechlorination
Solvent extraction
Flushing (in situ)
Rushing (in situ)
Flushing (in situ)
Thermal desorption
Bioremediation (in situ)
..--,. ;,'., ,.;,,, ,,| :•,, .•; ,. ,, ,
Dechlorination ! •
Soil washing
5
ADDED

• 	 - --


II HI T, W
Thermal
desorption

TH EDITION
DELETED
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
CHANGED TO



I [ -i™
, ,.-,,- .,-,.,

COMMENTS
Pilot study showed that dechlorination increased the volume
and that the waste still required incineration. An ESD to
incinerate residuals off-site is in peer review.
Will incinerate off-site.
Remedy involves pump-and-treat system, with on-site
discharge. Soil is not being targeted.
1 - -" - i - • T P! T -. 1,. : 1 - ^,1M; !• „ - rr , n '-- - -
Remedy involves pump-and-treat system, with on-site
discharge. Soil is not being targeted.
Remedy involves pump-and-treat system, with on-site
discharge. Soil is not being targeted.
rrhermal desorption is notnecessary because highly
.contaminated soil will be incinerated off-site. Remainder of
soil will be stabilized. ESD issued.
Will conduct ex situ passive volatilization.
•ipfi fii,j-.| . ^ ,*?'iii3Er7 fit .TIIR-, . f I : |ir : -fi 	 r^- ^ - ..H • ... -r
Will alter chemistry to achieve dechlorination during thermal •
desorption.
Bench-scale study of soil washing showed that the concentra-
tions of carcinogenic PAHs were not reduced adequately.
Dioxins also were discovered at much higher concentrations.
CONTACTS/PHONE
Joe Lemay
617-573-9622
Ross Gilleland
617-573-5766 j
JeffGratz
212-637-4320
. i ,T r i:~
JeffGratz !
212-637-4320 |
JeffGratz
212-637-6320
!EdFinnerty i: :
•212-637-4367 •-
Drew Lausch
215-597-3161
Ross Mantione
(Tobyhanna)
717-894-6494
i^fflr^ . r*. : i^ : • .• t :
Tony DeAngelo >
404-562-8826
Mark File
404-562-8927
Information on the date and issuance of Explanations of Significant Differences (ESDs) and ROD Amendments is not complete.
                                                                D-40
-------
Fifth Edition  (September 1993)  (continued)
REGION
4
i 4
1
5
6
7
\ &
]
i
1
9
!j g f'":'
9

SITE NAME, STATE
(ROD DATE)
American Creosote Works, FL
(09/28/89)
"'" ~ :'."K'7L| ' ; |:'. < ''' : i' '' -Sl
HollirigswO'rth Solde'rless, FL
(04/10/86)
Cliffs/Dow Dump, Ml
(09/27/89)
Tir'T""ir:i"1YU''::' ~~: ' "•'•
Tenth Street Dump/Junkyard,
OK
(09/27/90)
Fairfield Coal & Gas, IA
(09/21/90)
Sand Creek Industrial OU 5,
CO (09/28/90)
Koppers Company (Oroville),
CA
(04/04/90)
Sigrtetics (AMD 901 ) TRW OU,
CA
(09/11/91)
Teledyne Semiconductors, CA
(03/22/91)

TECHNOLOGY
(LISTED IN 4TH EDITION)
Bioremediation (ex situ)
' . ' '
Bioremediation (in situ)
Dechlorination
Bioremediation (in situ)
ir ': '. i • < '.' • 'V :: . jl*! I!/ ' 'i •*•-"
washing :,'.'!!;':
Bioremediation (ex situ)
; , . , . i , . l , | , -


5
ADDED

Soil vapor
extraction




fT;™"* :i I*1!8*!?"1
Soil vapor
extraction
Soil vapor
extraction

TH EDITION
DELETED
Yes

Yes
Yes
Yes

Yes


CHANGED TO





*"f"" 	 fl'fli ';-'•"!"-*:';•,.-
Thermal
desorption
^.m


COMMENTS
Bench-scale study of bioremediation (ex situ) showed that the
concentrations of carcinogenic PAHs were not reduced
adequately. Dioxins also were discovered at much higher
concentrations.
Listed jas soil; aejationijinathejtriird edition. \ ': •'•; ; ; -; J
Bioremediation (in situ) was a misinterpretation of the ROD.
All soil will be excavated and treated by bioremediation (ex
situ).
Remedy has been suspended because of difficulties :in
implementation and escalating cost; Actual cost was double
the cost projected in ROD. ROD amendment to cap in place
is being issued.
Pilot study showed in situ bioremediation was too costly. It
appears that the present pump-and-treat system will achieve
cleanup levels.
Soil washing:did not meet performance standards and was
expensive. ROD amendment was issued in early September
1993.
Misinterpretation of ROD during ROD analysis.
'Remedy added.: M :i : : '
Dropped by mistake from fourth edition.

CONTACTS/PHONE
Mark Fife
404-562-8927
John Zimmerman :
404-562-8936
Ken Glatz
312-886-1434
Mike Overbay :
214-655-8512 i
Bruce Morrison
913-551-7755
ErnaAcheson
303-312-6753
Fred Schlauffler
415-744-2359
Uoe He'a'ly i " j
415-744-2331 ; j
Kevin Graves (CA)
510-286-0435
Sean Hogan
415-744-2233
Information on the date and issuance of Explanations of Significant Differences (ESDs) and ROD Amendments is not complete.
                                                                 D-41
-------
Fifth Edition  (September 1993)  (continued)

REGION
10




10




SITE NAME, STATE
(ROD DATE)
IDEL Warm Waste Pond, ID
(12/05/91)



IDEL Warm Waste Pond, ID
(12/05/91)



TECHNOLOGY
(LISTED IN 4TH EDITION)
Acid extraction




Soil washing




5
ADDED










TH EDITION
DELETED
\fes




Yes




•••
CHANGED TO










•^•••••••BB
COMMENTS
Treatabity study of acid extraction did not achieve good
extraction rates. Did not reduce the volume of waste. Will
excavate, consolidate, and cap.


Treatability study of soil washing did not achieve acceptable
results. Did not reduce the volume of waste. Will excavate,
consolidate, and cap.


•••••
CONTACTS/PHONE
Linda Meyer
206-553-6636

Nolan Jenson (DOE)
208-526-0436
Linda Meyer
206-553-6636

Nolan Jenson (DOE) I
208-526-0436
information on the date and issuance of Explanations of Significant Differences (ESDs) and ROD Amendments is not complete.
                                                                 D-42
-------
Fourth Edition (October 1992):  Additions,  Changes, and  Deletions from the Third Edition (April 1992)


The fourth edition of this report added information about 10 innovative treatment technologies selected for remedial action under FY 1992 RODs and 21 innovative
treatment technologies implemented at non-Superfund sites. Other changes are listed below.
SITFNAM^ STATE TECHNOLOGY 4TH EDITION
REGION (ROD DATE) (LISTED IN 3RD EDITION) ADDED DELETED CHANGED TO
2
f 2 '
5
6 !
6
1 9*""
9
'"'' It?-1"
j
Lipari Landfill Marsh
Sediment, NJ
(07/11/88)
GEJWifi'ng Devices, PR
(09/30/88)
University of Minnesota, MN
(06/11/90)
Soltynri/iridustnalbechlorina-
tionTransformers,TX
(03/25/88)
Koppers/Texarkana, TX
(09/23/88)
Poly Garb! NV Removal)
; |
Teledyne Semiconductors, CA
(03/22/91)
Gould BatterylORi ' 7; **' ";"
(03/31/88) ;; i ; j ; -
Thermal desorption
Thermal desorption
Soil washing
Bioremediation
(in situ)
Soil vapor extraction
Soil washing!; '•.". I '•'"' "
Thermal
desorption
"i-™:T-<
In situ flushing
T ^-ajMasfJIfiif W|(fflf|M?r
5< «e^)|^||il|^li,lli> f^tjE^l^pi- i
Soil'jwashing"
,-,..-.r.,r.-
Yes
?:Vfe'
„.. r,,,,,:
Yes

Soil washing
Incineration
(in the fifth edition)
Biore'mediation
(ex situ)
j1
••••^•••••••••B™
COMMENTS CONTACTS/PHONE
Missed during original ROD analysis.

An ESD was issued in August 1 991 to change remedy to
thermal desorption or incineration. Incineration was chosen
because it was the less expensive of the two.
Discontinued because of difficulties :jn implementatiori. '"
Remedy added by ROD amendment.
Reclassified technology.; •;. ,; i i !
Mistakenly deleted from report.
Missed 'during original flODi analysis; ' •- ; :'•
Tom Graff
816-426-2296
Caroline Kwan ! |
212-637-4275
Darrel Owens
312-886-7089
Jo'hln Meyefe"
214-667-6742
- . -.- . . !
Ursula Lennox
214-655-6735
BobMandel
415-744-2290
Sean Hogan
415-744-2233
'Chip Humphries j ';"' j
503-326-2678 '.-" \
• i
Information on the date and issuance of Explanations of Significant Differences (ESDs) and ROD Amendments is not complete.
                                                                 D-43
-------
Third Edition (April 1992):  Additions,  Changes, and Deletions from the Second Edition (September 1991)


The third edition of this report added information to the 70 innovative treatment technologies selected for remedial actions under Ft 1991 RODs, Other changes are
listed below.
1 SITE NAME, STATE I TECHNOLOGY 3RD EDITION
REGION {ROD DATE) | (LISTED IN 2ND EDITION} ADDED | DELETED | CHANGED TO COMMENTS CONTACTS/PHONE
2
2
2
! 4
5
• :-- r -,"- ,i-';-
5
5
i 6
6
| 	 a'"
i
i
Marathon Battery, NY
(09/30/88)
Goose Farm, NJ
(09/27/85)
GE Wiring Services, PR
(09/30/88)
it ' i (M||i .1: 1 •-( =| - | i||, Ifl l.| 'TV ' f !' '"
Coleman-Evans Wood
Preserving, FL
(09/26/90)
Sangamo/Crab Orchard
National Wildlife Refuge, IL
(08/01/90)
;"!' » fit »i|j'B-e|, !..!. ii.i i-- -i
AndersftnilDevelQpment, Ml
(09/28^0)1 ; !
U.S.Aviex,MI
(09/07/88)
-= .f -t "i i' i , .n: ; i i',-|-i,i. ii: r
Atchison/Santa Fe/Glovis, rift/1
(09/23/88)
Crystal Chemical, TX
(09/27/90)
= 1 " I-' iii'tr jiflnri-Li^ :nvi . :-i -Lnx-jii
SoIventiSBrviee.CA i
(09/27/90) i
i
Thermal desorption
Flushing (in situ)
Soil washing
Iil|,,I IIPIlII '.:, 11 1 irl.l ,,HI,(,. -• . „
Soil in/ashing
In situ vitrification
,'.' • -f . fi "W-'t :~ -iSI'lf B'1H,=T||T- - ' ' I".
In situ vitrification
Flushing (in situ)
m» i(r« up - • a, I .Mjrjriiir ii.ji-; :•".,,,.'.
Bioremedjation (ex situ)
In situ vitrification
!!T,--Tr iT^ii i.,,' • :-. •• i,,. r. • ii:'i1.1^r; i i
Bioremediation (in situ) ;
: - ;-

,""! . " I

i

"i r i :T i ,

:, - l|ll, .11 I|_ ,



Yes
- ,: ,-| ..,; -,,
Yes

Yes

Yes'
Yes
' 	 Yes"
Yes
Yes


I! ,, | i-t
Thermal desorption
Incineraton
Thermal desorption
;l 1 : 'i^

^

'Tl h i i '.. i- 	 	 i: •; :| : r
i
!
During design, soil gas concentration at hot spots was below
state standards. Groundwater monitoring will continue.
r.-, - .. , .. , ,.,.-. r, . , ,,r ::, ,-.
Incorrectly classied. A pump-and -treat system with
reinjection of treated water is being used.
Possible pre-wash of debris with surfactants.
1 i • f ii- =ii i y. i i|inif". |i i . if- M -i nn •mifii'll • i ni-cn-t (=Pn=llf-itlir m^ii'ir==- '-mf-nrn r
Problems djie to the presence W furans; incineration is likely. ;
ROD specified the remedy as in situ vitrification or incinera-
tion; incineration was chosen.
rii -i -i;i|i,.i M, nr ir='i - -j-n-| ni^-Biinrirnt ip t-^-y --i\&\ sv^i'^in^-^^-wi-- Tit-,,, *=i = i i
Because of concern Dn the part of the community, the remedy !
was changed. A ROD amendment was signed on 9/30/91 , ;
and an ESD was signed on 1 0/2/92. \
Cleanup levels were reached by natural attenuation.
•|-r| I r,,.|Sr,. ,„,.,..,,. ,-, r-, .,T ,|, • ,« ,,| ,l: ;,,tl |!ll!;.
i| - ' :-. i ; -
'i :
Remedy was reconsidered after commercial availability of the
technology was delayed. Revised remedy will consist of
capping and off-site disposal and consolidation of soils.
i > i wt M I ^ *" 1 mz^ i f
ROD was misinterpreted during ROD analysis. i
i i' ' • : ' [I ;"; T
Pam Tames
212-264-1036
"' -' ! '"" '" f1 '"•"" ••
Laura Lombardo
212-264-6989
Caroline Kwan
212-637-4275
Tony Best : I
404-347-2643 :
Nan Gowda
312-353-9236
'fW!TI ' " 	 -"<" '" '
:JimiHahnenberg
;31 2-353-421 3
Robert Whippo
312-886-4759
B 't i ' i- = ii - ii'si i!!' i:. :i,,|,= , r
KyNiichols
214-655-6783
Lisa Price
214-655-6735
rmj'fiF: ;l i!fli!in-isi iifjn Hi •':> T iiiii'.i ".
Kevin Graves :
510-286-0435 i;
Steve Morse (CA) i
570-286-0304 \
Information on the date and issuance of Explanations of Significant Differences (ESDs) and ROD Amendments is not complete.
                                                               D-44
-------
Third  Edition  (April 1992)  (continued)
SITE NAME, STATE TECHNOLOGY 3RD EDITION
REGION (ROD DATE) (LISTED IN 2ND EDITION) ADDED DELETED CHANGED TO COMMENTS CONTACTS/PHONE
9
Poly Garb, NV (Removal)
Bioremediation(exsitu)


Bioremediation
(In situ)
Reclassified technology.
Bob Mandel
415-744-2290
Information on the date and issuance of Explanations of Significant Differences (ESDs) and ROD Amendments is not complete.
                                                                      D-45
-------
Second Edition (September 1991):  Additions, Changes, and Deletions from the First Edition (January 1991)


The second edition of this report added information about 45 treatment technologies selected for remedial acdons in RODs signed during fiscal year (FY) 1990 and 18
innovative treatment technologies used in removal acdons. Other changes are listed below.
SITE NAME, STATE
REGION
1


2

2

3



3




6


10

TECHNOLOGY 1 2ND EDITION | | |
(ROD DATE) (LISTED IN 1ST EDITION) ADDED DELETED I CHANGED TO I COMMENTS CONTACTS/PHONE
Re-Solve, MA
(09/24/87)
• i
GE Wiring Services, PR
(09/30/88)
SMS Instruments (Deer Park),
NY (09/29/89)
, | • ; •
Leetown Pesticides, VW
(03/31/86) .


Harvey-KnottDrum.DE
(09/30/85)


--..,, .
Sol Lynn/Industrial
Transformers, TX
(03/25/88)
Northwest Transformer, WA
(09/15/89)
Chemical extraction


Chemical treatment

Chemical treatment

Bioremediation



Flushing (in situ)



- - - L, :
Thermal desorption


In situ vitrification






















Yes






Yes



Yes (changed
to soil vapor
extraction in
third edition)
:



Yes

Dechlonnation


Soil washing












Dechlorination




Reclassified technology.


Reclassified technology.

ROD was misinterpreted during ROD analysis.

No further action. Risk was re-evaluated and it was
determined that risk was not sufficient for remedial action.


During remedial design, sampling indicated VOCs were no
longer present in the soils. Heavy metals remained at the
surface. An ESD was issued in December 1992. Remedy will
consist of capping the site.
- t • . ; • v- • T ..- .,
Reclassified technology. . ;<
1 : :.

Technology dropped because commercial availability was
delayed.
Lorenzo Thantu
212-637-4240

Caroline Kwan '
212-637-4275
Miko Fayon
212-637-4250
Andy Palestini
215-597-1286 |
Philip Rotstein !
215-566-3232
Kate Lose
215-5663240



John Meyer
214-665-6742

Christine Psyk
206-553-6519
Information on the date and issuance of Explanations of Significant Differences (ESDs) and ROD Amendments is not complete.
                                                                D-46
-------
APPENDIX E
SUPERFUND REMEDIAL ACTIONS
RODS SELECTING NATURAL
ATTENUATION

        fci._J,,j...:-
-------
-------
Superfund Remedial Actions:
RODs Selecting Natural Attenuation
Region Site Name, State
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
Cannon Engineering, MA
Mottolo Pig Farm, NH
Western Sand & Gravel, Rl
Dover Municipal Landfill, NH
Savage Municipal Water Supply, NH
PSC Resources, MA
Town Garage/Radio Beacon
(Holton Circle Ground Water Contamination), NH
Picillo Farm, Rl
Peterson/Puritan, Rl
Brunswick Naval Air Station, ME
Coakley Landfill, NH
Pease Air force Base, Zone 1 , NH
Pease Air force Base, Zone 2, NH
Pease Air force Base, Zone 3, NH
Fort Devens AOC 43 G & 43 J, MA
Gallups Quarry, CT
Renora, NJ
Ringwood Mines/Landfill, NJ
Marathon Battery, NY
Sarney Farm, NY
Conklin Dumps, NY
Kin-Buc Landfill, NJ
Islip Municipal Sanitary Landfill, NY
Johnstown City Landfill, NY
Juncos Landfill, PR
Naval Air Engineering Station, Area I and J, NJ
Plattsburg.AFB, OU 2, NY
Malta Rocket Fuel Area, NY
Tutu Well Field, VI
Carroll and Dubies Sewage Disposal, NY
Robintech, NY
Naval Weapons Station, Earle, OU 2 Site 19, NJ
Global Landfill, OU 2, NJ
Mid-Atlantic Wood Preservers, MD
Dover Gas Light, DE
Bell Landfill, PA
Dover AFB, Target Area 1 of Area 6, DE
Dover AFB, Target Area 3 of Area 6, DE
Dover Air Force Base, Fire Training Area 3,
East Management Unit, DE
Dover Air Force Base, Landfill 1 3,
East Management Unit, DE
ROD Date
3/31/88
3/29/91
4/16/91
9/10/91
9/27/91
9/15/92
9/30/92
9/27/93
9/30/93
9/30/94
9/30/94
6/26/95
9/18/95
9/26/95
10/17/96
9/30/97
9/29/87
9/29/88
9/30/88
9/27/90
3/29/91
9/28/92
9/30/92
3/31/93
10/5/93
1/5/95
3/31/95
7/13/96
8/5/96
9/30/96
7/25/97
9/25/97
9/29/97
12/31/90
8/16/94
9/30/94
9/26/95
9/26/95
9/30/97
9/30/97
                                    E-1
Region Site Name, State
3
3
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
Dover Air Force Base, Liquid Waste Disposal Area 1 4
and Landfill 1 5, Area 1 , East Management Unit, DE
Tobyhanna Army Depot, OU 1 (Areas A & B), PA
Dubose Oil Products, FL
Interstate Lead Co. (ILCO), AL
Yellow Water Road, FL
Redwing Carriers/Saraland, AL
Hercules 009 Landfill, GA
Cedartown Industries, GA
Anodyne (OU1),FL
Reeves Southeastern Galvanizing (OU2), FL
Cedartown, GA
Standard Auto Bumper, FL
Diamond Shamrock Landfill, GA
Murray-Ohio Dump,TN
BMI-Textron, FL
Davie Landfill, FL
Agrico Chemical, FL
B & B Chemical, FL
National Starch & Chemical Co, OU 4, NC
Insterstate Lead Co. OU 3, AL
Taylor Road Landfill, FL
Wingate Road Municipal Incinerator Dump
and Landfill, Fl
Chevron Chemical Company, FL
Cecil Field Naval Air Station, OU 2, FL
FCX, Inc. (Statesville Plant), OU 3, NC
Townsend Saw Chain Company, SC
Arlington Blending and Packaging, TN
Charievoix Municipal Well Field, Ml
A & F Materials Reclaiming, IL
Cliff/Dow Dump, Ml
Wheeler Pit, Wl
Oak Grove Sanitary Landfill, MN
Fadrowski Drum Disposal, Wl
Twin Cities AF Reserve (SAR Landfill), MN
Alsco Anaconda, OH
Dakue Sanitary Landfill, MN
Adams County Quincy Landfill Sites #2 & #3, IL
Agate Lake Scrap Yard, MN
Prestolite Battery, IN
Albion-Sheridan Township, Landfill, Ml
Hechimovich Sanitary Landfill, Wl
ROD Date
9/30/97
9/30/97
3/29/90
9/30/91
6/30/92
12/15/92
3/25/93
5/7/93
6/17/93
9/9/93
11/2/93
12/10/93
5/3/94
6/17/94
8/11/94
8/1 1/94
8/18/94
9/12/94
10/6/94
9/29/95
9/29/95
5/14/96
5/22/96
6/24/96
9/30/96
12/19/96
7/24/97
9/30/85
8/14/86
9/27/89
9/28/90
12/21/90
6/10/91
3/31/92
9/30/92
6/30/93
9/30/93
12/28/93
8/23/94
3/28/95
9/6/95
-------
Superfund Remedial Actions:
RODs Selecting Natural Attenuation (continued)
Region Site Name, State
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
• 6
6
6
7
Sauk County Landfill, OU 2, Wl
Galen Myers Dump.Drum Salvage, IN
Kbhler Complany Landfill, Wl
Roto-Finish, Ml
ReillyTarand Chemical
(Indianapolis Plant), OU 5, IN
Bendix Site, St. Joseph, Ml
Tippecanoe Sanitary Landfill, Inc., IN
Wright Patterson Air Force Base, OU 2,
Spill Sites 2, 3, and 10, OH
Sikes Disposal Pit, TX
United Creosoting, TX
French, Limited, TX
Brio Refining, TX
Koppers (Texarkana Plant), TX
Sheridan Disposal Services, TX
Hardage/Criner (Amendment), OK
Arkwood, AR
Koppers (Texarkana Plant) Amendment, TX
Mosley Road Sanitary Landfill, OK
Gulf Coast Vacuum Services (OU1), LA
Fourth Street Abandoned Refinery, OK
Dutchtown Treatment, LA
Monroe Auto Pit (Finsch Road Landfill), AR
Farmers Mutual Cooperative, IA
ROD Date
9/28/95
9/29/95
6/26/96
3/31/97
6/30/97
9130197
9/30/97
9/30/97
9/18/86
9/30/86
3/24/88
3/31/88
9/23/88
9/27/89
11/22/89
9/28/90
3/4/92
6/29/92
9/30/92
9/30/93
6/20/94
9/26/96
9/29/92
Region Site Name, State
7
7
8
8
8
8
8
8
9
9
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
CleburnStreeWell.NE
BeeCeeMFG.MO
Mystery Bridge at Highway 20, WY
Denver Radium (OU8), CO
Utah Power& Light/American Barrel, UT
Rocky Mountain Arsenal Offpost OU, CO
Rocky Mountain Arsenal Onpost, OU, CO
Hill Air Force Base, OU 6, UT
Camp Pendelton Marine Coprs base, OU 1 ,
Site 9-41 , Area, CA
Operating Industries, Inc. Landfill, CA
Hanford 1 1 00-Area (DOE), WA
Eielson Air Force Base (OU6), AK
ElmendorfAFB, OU5.AK
ElmendorfAFB,OU4,AK
Wycoff/Eagle Harbor, West Harbor OU, WA
Fairchild AFB, Priority 2 sites, AK
Fort Wainwright, OU 3, AK
Naval Air Station, Whidbey Isalnd - Ault Field,
OU 5 Areas 1 , 52 and 31 , WA
Fort Wainwright, OU 4, AK
Fort Wainwright, OU 2, AK
Monsanto Chemical Company, ID
Fort Wainwright, OU1.AK
Fort Richardson, OU A & B, AK
ROD Date
6/7/96
9/30/97
9/24/90
1/28/92
7/7/93
12/19/95
6/11/96
9/30/97
12/7/95
9/30/96
9/24/93
9/27/94
12/28/94
9/26/95
12/8/95
12/20/95
4/9/96
7/10/96
9/24/96
3/27/97
4/30/97
6/27/97
9/15/97
                                     E-2
-------
-------
EPA
w

United States
Environmental Protection Agency
(5102G)
Washington, D.C. 20460

Official Business
Penalty for Private Use $300

EPA-542-R99-001
-------